Agenda packet — Ontario City Council, June 20, 2023 (part 15 of 32)

LOS F E F F D A F D F F
Approach Delay 84.5 68.8 79.6 101.2
Approach LOS F E E F
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Natural Cycle: 115
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.23
Intersection Signal Delay: 84.9 Intersection LOS: F
Intersection Capacity Utilization 107.1% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 3: Archibald Av. & Riverside Dr.

7.7-23
3393
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Rich Haven Specific Plan TA (JN:14822) 3: Archibald Av. & Riverside Dr. 10/06/2022
HY (2045) With Project Conditions - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc. Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 223 913 705 245 769 222 379 1148 156 354 1138 307 Future Volume (veh/h) 223 913 705 245 769 222 379 1148 156 354 1138 307 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 228 932 362 250 785 114 387 1171 82 361 1161 160 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 235 996 434 206 933 415 322 1313 92 296 1244 171 Arrive On Green 0.15 0.30 0.30 0.13 0.28 0.28 0.10 0.28 0.28 0.10 0.29 0.29 Sat Flow, veh/h 1594 3367 1468 1594 3367 1495 3092 4610 323 3092 4292 591 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 228 932 362 250 785 114 387 819 434 361 872 449 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1594 1683 1468 1594 1683 1495 1546 1612 1707 1546 1612 1658 Q Serve(g_s), s 17.0 32.1 27.5 15.4 26.2 5.1 12.4 29.0 29.1 11.4 31.4 31.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 17.0 32.1 27.5 15.4 26.2 5.1 12.4 29.0 29.1 11.4 31.4 31.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.19 1.00 0.36
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 235 996 434 206 933 415 322 919 486 296 935 481 V/C Ratio(X) 0.97 0.94 0.83 1.21 0.84 0.27 1.20 0.89 0.89 1.22 0.93 0.93 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 235 1011 441 206 949 421 322 968 513 296 941 484 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 50.5 40.9 39.2 51.9 40.6 17.7 53.4 40.9 40.9 53.9 41.2 41.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 49.6 15.2 12.8 132.5 6.8 0.4 117.4 10.1 17.2 126.0 15.6 25.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 9.7 14.7 10.9 13.5 11.2 2.5 9.9 12.2 13.9 9.4 13.8 15.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 100.1 56.1 52.1 184.4 47.4 18.0 170.8 51.0 58.0 179.9 56.8 66.5 LnGrp LOS F E D F D B F D E F E E
Approach Vol, veh/h 1522 1149 1640 1682
Approach Delay, s/veh 61.7 74.3 81.1 85.8
Approach LOS E E F F
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 17.6 40.2 20.0 41.5 17.0 40.8 22.2 39.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.2 * 6.2 4.6 6.2 4.6 6.2 4.6 6.2 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.4 * 36 15.4 35.8 12.4 34.8 17.6 33.6 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 13.4 31.1 17.4 34.1 14.4 33.4 19.0 28.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.9 0.0 1.1 0.0 1.0 0.0 2.4 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 76.2
HCM 6th LOS E
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

7.7-24
3394
Timings Rich Haven Specific Plan TA (JN:14822)
4: Archibald Av. & Chino Av. 10/06/2022
HY (2045) With Project Conditions - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc. Page 3
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 196 347 279 70 170 77 230 1384 93 1614 Future Volume (vph) 196 347 279 70 170 77 230 1384 93 1614 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8
Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 1 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.6 22.6 22.6 9.6 22.6 22.6 9.6 22.6 9.6 22.6 Total Split (s) 18.0 29.6 29.6 11.0 22.6 22.6 20.0 60.2 19.2 59.4 Total Split (%) 15.0% 24.7% 24.7% 9.2% 18.8% 18.8% 16.7% 50.2% 16.0% 49.5% Yellow Time (s) 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 13.4 25.0 25.0 6.4 18.0 18.0 15.4 53.3 19.2 54.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.21 0.21 0.05 0.15 0.15 0.13 0.44 0.16 0.46 v/c Ratio 1.16 0.98 0.57 0.87 0.67 0.21 1.18 0.66 0.38 1.14 Control Delay 164.1 90.8 12.7 123.7 61.7 1.3 166.4 28.9 49.3 102.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 164.1 90.8 12.7 123.7 61.7 1.3 166.4 28.9 49.3 102.6

LOS F F B F E A F C D F
Approach Delay 81.7 60.8 47.5 99.9
Approach LOS F E D F
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Natural Cycle: 120
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.18
Intersection Signal Delay: 75.0 Intersection LOS: E
Intersection Capacity Utilization 104.8% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 4: Archibald Av. & Chino Av.

7.7-25
3395
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Rich Haven Specific Plan TA (JN:14822) 4: Archibald Av. & Chino Av. 10/06/2022
HY (2045) With Project Conditions - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc. Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 196 347 279 70 170 77 230 1384 85 93 1614 134 Future Volume (veh/h) 196 347 279 70 170 77 230 1384 85 93 1614 134 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 204 361 150 73 177 44 240 1442 47 97 1681 72 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 178 369 308 85 266 225 205 1737 57 391 1541 66 Arrive On Green 0.17 0.31 0.31 0.08 0.22 0.22 0.19 0.51 0.51 0.37 0.68 0.68 Sat Flow, veh/h 1594 1772 1478 1594 1772 1502 1594 5116 167 1594 3374 144 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 204 361 150 73 177 44 240 999 490 97 879 874 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1594 1772 1478 1594 1772 1502 1594 1772 1739 1594 1772 1746 Q Serve(g_s), s 13.4 24.2 9.9 5.4 10.9 1.8 15.4 28.8 28.8 5.1 54.8 54.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.4 24.2 9.9 5.4 10.9 1.8 15.4 28.8 28.8 5.1 54.8 54.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.08
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 178 369 308 85 266 225 205 1203 590 391 809 797 V/C Ratio(X) 1.15 0.98 0.49 0.86 0.67 0.20 1.17 0.83 0.83 0.25 1.09 1.10 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 178 369 308 85 266 225 205 1642 806 391 809 797 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 49.9 41.0 36.1 54.8 43.8 15.7 48.4 26.5 26.5 30.2 18.9 18.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 112.3 40.8 1.2 54.1 6.2 0.4 117.6 2.7 5.4 0.3 57.6 61.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 10.4 13.5 3.4 3.4 4.9 1.0 12.1 9.4 9.7 1.9 25.3 25.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 162.2 81.8 37.2 108.9 49.9 16.1 166.0 29.2 31.9 30.5 76.5 80.4 LnGrp LOS F F D F D B F C C C F F
Approach Vol, veh/h 715 294 1729 1850
Approach Delay, s/veh 95.4 59.5 49.0 75.9
Approach LOS F E D E
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 34.1 45.3 11.0 29.6 20.0 59.4 18.0 22.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 14.6 55.6 6.4 25.0 15.4 54.8 13.4 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.1 30.8 7.4 26.2 17.4 56.8 15.4 12.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 67.7
HCM 6th LOS E

7.7-26
3396
Timings Rich Haven Specific Plan TA (JN:14822)
6: Archibald Av. & Edison Av./Ontario Ranch Rd. 10/06/2022 HY (2045) With Project Conditions - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc. Page 5
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 178 800 874 295 329 128 305 1220 356 181 1716 126 Future Volume (vph) 178 800 874 295 329 128 305 1220 356 181 1716 126 Turn Type Prot NA Free Prot NA Perm Prot NA Free Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases Free 8 Free 6
Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 8 5 2 1 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.6 39.2 9.6 46.2 46.2 9.6 39.5 9.6 46.5 46.5 Total Split (s) 11.0 39.6 17.6 46.2 46.2 15.0 48.0 14.8 47.8 47.8 Total Split (%) 9.2% 33.0% 14.7% 38.5% 38.5% 12.5% 40.0% 12.3% 39.8% 39.8% Yellow Time (s) 3.6 5.2 3.6 5.2 5.2 3.6 5.5 3.6 5.5 5.5 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.6 6.2 4.6 6.2 6.2 4.6 6.5 4.6 6.5 6.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None Min None Min Min Act Effct Green (s) 6.4 24.6 111.4 13.0 31.3 31.3 10.4 42.1 111.4 9.7 41.4 41.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.22 1.00 0.12 0.28 0.28 0.09 0.38 1.00 0.09 0.37 0.37 v/c Ratio 1.09 0.72 0.61 0.89 0.35 0.26 1.09 0.64 0.25 0.72 0.92 0.20 Control Delay 145.9 43.8 1.9 77.3 32.7 6.2 125.3 31.0 0.4 66.0 42.6 3.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 145.9 43.8 1.9 77.3 32.7 6.2 125.3 31.0 0.4 66.0 42.6 3.5

LOS F D A E C A F C A E D A
Approach Delay 33.8 45.7 40.5 42.3
Approach LOS C D D D
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 111.4
Natural Cycle: 115
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.09
Intersection Signal Delay: 39.7 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.3% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 6: Archibald Av. & Edison Av./Ontario Ranch Rd.

7.7-27
3397
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Rich Haven Specific Plan TA (JN:14822) 6: Archibald Av. & Edison Av./Ontario Ranch Rd. 10/06/2022 HY (2045) With Project Conditions - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc. Page 6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 178 800 874 295 329 128 305 1220 356 181 1716 126 Future Volume (veh/h) 178 800 874 295 329 128 305 1220 356 181 1716 126 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1575 1772 1772 1575 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 187 842 0 311 346 93 321 1284 0 191 1806 114 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 177 1119 359 961 407 305 2069 245 1982 560
Arrive On Green 0.06 0.21 0.00 0.12 0.27 0.27 0.10 0.39 0.00 0.08 0.37 0.37 Sat Flow, veh/h 3000 5316 1502 3000 3544 1500 3188 5316 1502 3092 5316 1502 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 187 842 0 311 346 93 321 1284 0 191 1806 114 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1500 1772 1502 1500 1772 1500 1594 1772 1502 1546 1772 1502 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.4 16.2 0.0 11.1 8.6 5.2 10.4 21.1 0.0 6.6 35.1 5.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.4 16.2 0.0 11.1 8.6 5.2 10.4 21.1 0.0 6.6 35.1 5.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 177 1119 359 961 407 305 2069 245 1982 560 V/C Ratio(X) 1.06 0.75 0.87 0.36 0.23 1.05 0.62 0.78 0.91 0.20 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 177 1633 359 1304 552 305 2069 290 2019 570 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 51.2 40.3 0.0 47.0 32.0 30.8 49.2 26.7 0.0 49.1 32.4 23.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 84.2 1.2 0.0 18.8 0.2 0.3 66.1 0.6 0.0 8.9 6.7 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.4 6.8 0.0 4.9 3.5 1.8 6.7 8.3 0.0 2.7 14.8 1.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 135.4 41.4 0.0 65.8 32.2 31.1 115.3 27.3 0.0 58.0 39.0 23.3 LnGrp LOS F D E C C F C E D C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1029 A 750 1605 A 2111
Approach Delay, s/veh 58.5 46.0 44.9 39.9
Approach LOS E D D D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.2 48.8 17.6 29.1 15.0 47.0 11.0 35.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 6.5 4.6 6.2 4.6 6.5 4.6 6.2 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 10.2 41.5 13.0 33.4 10.4 41.3 6.4 40.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.6 23.1 13.1 18.2 12.4 37.1 8.4 10.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 7.7 0.0 4.6 0.0 3.5 0.0 2.3 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 45.7
HCM 6th LOS D
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [NBR, EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

7.7-28
3398
Timings Rich Haven Specific Plan TA (JN:14822)
8: Turner Av. & Chino Av. 10/06/2022
HY (2045) With Project Conditions - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc. Page 7
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 192 210 45 155 24 153 70 238
Future Volume (vph) 192 210 45 155 24 153 70 238
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 4 8 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 Total Split (%) 64.2% 64.2% 64.2% 64.2% 35.8% 35.8% 35.8% 35.8% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None None None None Min Min Min Min
Act Effct Green (s) 13.4 13.4 13.4 13.4 9.9 9.9 9.9 9.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 v/c Ratio 0.52 0.23 0.13 0.19 0.09 0.22 0.25 0.33
Control Delay 13.3 5.5 7.6 4.7 10.5 8.5 12.0 9.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 13.3 5.5 7.6 4.7 10.5 8.5 12.0 9.6

LOS B A A A B A B A
Approach Delay 8.6 5.2 8.7 10.0
Approach LOS A A A B
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 32.9
Natural Cycle: 45
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.52
Intersection Signal Delay: 8.3 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 8: Turner Av. & Chino Av.

7.7-29
3399
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Rich Haven Specific Plan TA (JN:14822) 8: Turner Av. & Chino Av. 10/06/2022
HY (2045) With Project Conditions - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc. Page 8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 192 210 74 45 155 86 24 153 44 70 238 69 Future Volume (veh/h) 192 210 74 45 155 86 24 153 44 70 238 69 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.98 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 209 228 80 49 168 93 26 166 48 76 259 75 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 600 987 337 577 853 450 442 726 202 490 732 207 Arrive On Green 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 Sat Flow, veh/h 1001 2463 841 959 2131 1123 936 2570 715 1026 2589 734 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 209 154 154 49 131 130 26 106 108 76 166 168 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1001 1683 1621 959 1683 1570 936 1683 1601 1026 1683 1640 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.9 1.7 1.8 1.0 1.4 1.5 0.6 1.4 1.5 1.7 2.2 2.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.4 1.7 1.8 2.8 1.4 1.5 3.0 1.4 1.5 3.2 2.2 2.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.52 1.00 0.72 1.00 0.45 1.00 0.45
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 600 674 649 577 674 629 442 476 453 490 476 463 V/C Ratio(X) 0.35 0.23 0.24 0.08 0.19 0.21 0.06 0.22 0.24 0.15 0.35 0.36 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 2754 4297 4137 2640 4297 4007 1446 2282 2171 1591 2282 2223 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 7.7 5.6 5.6 6.6 5.5 5.6 9.3 7.8 7.8 9.1 8.1 8.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.4 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 8.0 5.8 5.8 6.6 5.7 5.7 9.4 8.0 8.1 9.2 8.5 8.6 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 517 310 240 410
Approach Delay, s/veh 6.7 5.8 8.2 8.7
Approach LOS A A A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.5 15.9 12.5 15.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 38.5 72.5 38.5 72.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.0 8.4 5.2 4.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.3 3.0 2.2 1.8
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.3
HCM 6th LOS A

7.7-30
3400
Timings Rich Haven Specific Plan TA (JN:14822)
12: Haven Av. & Riverside Dr. 10/06/2022
HY (2045) With Project Conditions - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc. Page 9
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 462 683 173 535 150 65 642 164 274 756 571 Future Volume (vph) 462 683 173 535 150 65 642 164 274 756 571 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Perm NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6 6
Permitted Phases 8 2 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 8 2 2 2 6 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.6 25.2 9.6 30.2 30.2 23.7 23.7 23.7 24.8 24.8 24.8 Total Split (s) 19.0 36.3 12.9 30.2 30.2 40.8 40.8 40.8 30.0 30.0 30.0 Total Split (%) 15.8% 30.3% 10.8% 25.2% 25.2% 34.0% 34.0% 34.0% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.6 5.2 3.6 5.2 5.2 3.7 3.7 3.7 4.8 4.8 4.8 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.6 6.2 4.6 6.2 6.2 4.7 4.7 4.7 5.8 5.8 5.8 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None None None None None Min Min Min Min Min Min Act Effct Green (s) 14.4 29.8 8.3 23.7 23.7 36.1 36.1 36.1 24.2 24.2 24.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.25 0.07 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.20 0.20 0.20 v/c Ratio 1.26 0.94 0.82 0.80 0.38 1.24 0.63 0.30 0.89 1.11 0.78 Control Delay 180.8 63.1 83.3 55.3 9.1 234.9 39.2 6.1 76.2 110.7 12.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 180.8 63.1 83.3 55.3 9.1 234.9 39.2 6.1 76.2 110.7 12.1

LOS F E F E A F D A E F B
Approach Delay 106.6 52.9 47.6 69.7
Approach LOS F D D E
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 119.7
Natural Cycle: 110
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.26
Intersection Signal Delay: 72.4 Intersection LOS: E
Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.6% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 12: Haven Av. & Riverside Dr.

7.7-31
3401
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Rich Haven Specific Plan TA (JN:14822) 12: Haven Av. & Riverside Dr. 10/06/2022
HY (2045) With Project Conditions - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc. Page 10
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 462 683 105 173 535 150 65 642 164 274 756 571 Future Volume (veh/h) 462 683 105 173 535 150 65 642 164 274 756 571 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 481 711 57 180 557 83 68 669 98 285 788 369 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 435 824 66 236 683 283 382 849 360 366 813 344 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.26 0.26 0.07 0.19 0.19 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.23 0.23 0.23 Sat Flow, veh/h 3188 3232 259 3188 3544 1466 1594 3544 1502 1594 3544 1498 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 481 390 378 180 557 83 68 669 98 285 788 369 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1594 1772 1719 1594 1772 1466 1594 1772 1502 1594 1772 1498 Q Serve(g_s), s 14.4 22.1 22.2 5.8 15.9 5.1 3.6 18.7 5.6 17.7 23.2 24.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 14.4 22.1 22.2 5.8 15.9 5.1 3.6 18.7 5.6 17.7 23.2 24.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.15 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 435 452 438 236 683 283 382 849 360 366 813 344 V/C Ratio(X) 1.11 0.86 0.86 0.76 0.82 0.29 0.18 0.79 0.27 0.78 0.97 1.07 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 435 506 491 251 806 334 545 1213 514 366 813 344 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 45.5 37.5 37.5 47.9 40.8 36.4 31.9 37.6 32.6 38.1 40.3 40.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 74.9 13.1 13.6 10.7 5.6 0.6 0.2 2.3 0.4 10.3 24.2 69.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 9.9 10.7 10.4 2.6 7.1 1.8 1.4 8.3 2.0 7.7 12.4 15.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 120.5 50.7 51.1 58.6 46.4 37.0 32.1 39.9 33.0 48.5 64.5 110.3 LnGrp LOS F D D E D D C D C D E F
Approach Vol, veh/h 1249 820 835 1442
Approach Delay, s/veh 77.7 48.1 38.5 73.0
Approach LOS E D D E
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 30.0 12.4 33.1 30.0 19.0 26.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s * 4.7 4.6 6.2 5.8 4.6 6.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s * 36 8.3 30.1 24.2 14.4 24.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 20.7 7.8 24.2 26.2 16.4 17.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.6 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 1.9
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 63.0
HCM 6th LOS E
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

7.7-32
3402
Timings Rich Haven Specific Plan TA (JN:14822)
13: Haven Av. & Chino Av. 12/15/2022
HY (2045) With Project Conditions - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc. Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBT Ø1
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 142 57 28 67 184 704 735
Future Volume (vph) 142 57 28 67 184 704 735
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Prot NA NA
Protected Phases 74385261
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase 7438526
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.6 22.4 9.6 22.8 9.6 22.8 21.7 9.6
Total Split (s) 20.2 33.4 9.6 22.8 24.0 67.4 53.0 9.6
Total Split (%) 16.8% 27.8% 8.0% 19.0% 20.0% 56.2% 44.2% 8% Yellow Time (s) 3.6 4.4 3.6 4.8 3.6 4.8 3.7 3.6
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.6 5.4 4.6 5.8 4.6 5.8 4.7
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None None None None None Min Min None
Act Effct Green (s) 14.4 21.4 5.4 12.1 16.3 61.6 41.6
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.21 0.05 0.12 0.16 0.62 0.42
v/c Ratio 0.66 0.37 0.16 0.32 0.75 0.35 0.84
Control Delay 60.8 27.1 55.2 50.8 62.9 10.7 32.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 60.8 27.1 55.2 50.8 62.9 10.7 32.2

LOS ECEDEBC
Approach Delay 43.9 52.1 21.2 32.2
Approach LOS D D C C
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 100.1
Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.84
Intersection Signal Delay: 30.2 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 13: Haven Av. & Chino Av.

7.7-33
3403
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Rich Haven Specific Plan TA (JN:14822) 13: Haven Av. & Chino Av. 12/15/2022
HY (2045) With Project Conditions - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc. Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 142 57 84 28 67 0 184 704 25 0 735 356 Future Volume (veh/h) 142 57 84 28 67 0 184 704 25 0 735 356 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1673 1870 1772 1870 1870 1870 1673 1772 1870 1870 1772 1772 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 149 62 88 30 73 0 194 741 27 0 774 375 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 178 132 188 100 200 0 225 2067 75 2 920 445
Arrive On Green 0.11 0.19 0.19 0.03 0.11 0.00 0.14 0.61 0.61 0.00 0.42 0.42 Sat Flow, veh/h 1594 699 992 3456 1870 0 1594 3398 124 1781 2201 1063 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 149 0 150 30 73 0 194 386 382 0 592 557 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1594 0 1692 1728 1870 0 1594 1772 1750 1781 1683 1581 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.6 0.0 7.4 0.8 3.4 0.0 11.1 10.2 10.2 0.0 29.5 29.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.6 0.0 7.4 0.8 3.4 0.0 11.1 10.2 10.2 0.0 29.5 29.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.59 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.07 1.00 0.67
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 178 0 320 100 200 0 225 1078 1064 2 704 661 V/C Ratio(X) 0.84 0.00 0.47 0.30 0.37 0.00 0.86 0.36 0.36 0.00 0.84 0.84 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 266 0 507 185 340 0 331 1168 1153 95 870 817 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 40.7 0.0 33.7 44.5 38.8 0.0 39.3 9.2 9.2 0.0 24.4 24.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 8.9 0.0 1.1 0.6 1.1 0.0 10.4 0.2 0.2 0.0 6.2 6.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.7 0.0 3.0 0.3 1.6 0.0 4.8 3.3 3.3 0.0 12.3 11.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 49.6 0.0 34.8 45.1 39.9 0.0 49.7 9.4 9.4 0.0 30.6 31.2 LnGrp LOS D A C D D A D A A A C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 299 103 962 1149
Approach Delay, s/veh 42.2 41.4 17.5 30.9
Approach LOS D D B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 0.0 62.7 7.3 23.5 17.8 44.9 15.0 15.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 5.8 4.6 * 5.8 4.6 * 5.8 4.6 5.8 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 61.6 5.0 * 28 19.4 * 48 15.6 17.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 0.0 12.2 2.8 9.4 13.1 31.6 10.6 5.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.8 0.0 0.7 0.1 7.5 0.1 0.2 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 27.5
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

7.7-34
3404
Timings Rich Haven Specific Plan TA (JN:14822)
15: Haven Av. & Ontario Ranch Rd. 10/06/2022
HY (2045) With Project Conditions - AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc. Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 230 1503 54 127 1092 209 75 362 192 489 419 172 Future Volume (vph) 230 1503 54 127 1092 209 75 362 192 489 419 172 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.6 29.2 29.2 9.6 34.5 34.5 9.6 47.8 47.8 9.6 45.8 45.8 Total Split (s) 14.0 38.5 38.5 10.0 34.5 34.5 18.0 49.5 49.5 22.0 53.5 53.5 Total Split (%) 11.7% 32.1% 32.1% 8.3% 28.8% 28.8% 15.0% 41.3% 41.3% 18.3% 44.6% 44.6% Yellow Time (s) 3.6 5.2 5.2 3.6 5.5 5.5 3.6 4.8 4.8 3.6 4.8 4.8 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.6 6.2 6.2 4.6 6.5 6.5 4.6 5.8 5.8 4.6 5.8 5.8 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Max Max None Max Max None None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 9.5 32.6 32.6 5.5 28.3 28.3 9.1 19.8 19.8 17.6 30.5 30.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.34 0.34 0.06 0.29 0.29 0.09 0.20 0.20 0.18 0.31 0.31 v/c Ratio 1.60 0.91 0.10 0.82 0.57 0.38 0.55 0.57 0.51 1.83 0.43 0.31 Control Delay 329.3 40.3 0.7 82.2 31.7 6.5 57.9 37.2 17.3 415.7 28.3 5.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 329.3 40.3 0.7 82.2 31.7 6.5 57.9 37.2 17.3 415.7 28.3 5.2

LOS F D A F C A E D B F C A
Approach Delay 76.2 32.5 33.6 200.0
Approach LOS E C C F
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 96.9
Natural Cycle: 115
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.83
Intersection Signal Delay: 85.2 Intersection LOS: F
Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.3% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 15: Haven Av. & Ontario Ranch Rd.

7.7-35
3405
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Rich Haven Specific Plan TA (JN:14822) 15: Haven Av. & Ontario Ranch Rd. 10/06/2022
HY (2045) With Project Conditions - AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc. Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 230 1503 54 127 1092 209 75 362 192 489 419 172 Future Volume (veh/h) 230 1503 54 127 1092 209 75 362 192 489 419 172 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1673 1772 1772 1575 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 247 1616 31 137 1174 117 81 389 104 526 451 94 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 161 1846 521 174 2156 457 100 594 265 298 1012 449 Arrive On Green 0.15 0.52 0.52 0.09 0.46 0.46 0.09 0.26 0.26 0.28 0.45 0.45 Sat Flow, veh/h 1594 5316 1500 3000 7088 1502 1594 3367 1499 1594 3367 1494 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 247 1616 31 137 1174 117 81 389 104 526 451 94 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1594 1772 1500 1500 1772 1502 1594 1683 1499 1594 1683 1494 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.4 24.9 1.0 4.2 11.1 4.5 4.6 9.6 5.3 17.4 8.6 3.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.4 24.9 1.0 4.2 11.1 4.5 4.6 9.6 5.3 17.4 8.6 3.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 161 1846 521 174 2156 457 100 594 265 298 1012 449 V/C Ratio(X) 1.53 0.88 0.06 0.79 0.54 0.26 0.81 0.65 0.39 1.76 0.45 0.21 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 161 1846 521 174 2156 457 230 1582 704 298 1726 766 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 39.5 20.5 14.8 41.9 20.6 18.8 41.6 31.7 30.1 33.5 20.2 18.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 268.8 6.2 0.2 19.3 1.0 1.4 5.7 1.2 0.9 357.3 0.3 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 15.3 7.7 0.3 1.9 3.8 1.5 1.9 3.5 1.8 35.1 2.9 1.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 308.3 26.7 15.0 61.2 21.6 20.2 47.3 32.9 31.1 390.8 20.5 19.1 LnGrp LOS F C B E C C D C C F C B
Approach Vol, veh/h 1894 1428 574 1071
Approach Delay, s/veh 63.2 25.3 34.6 202.2
Approach LOS E C C F
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.0 22.2 10.0 38.8 10.4 33.8 14.0 34.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 5.8 4.6 * 6.5 4.6 5.8 4.6 6.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.4 43.7 5.4 * 32 13.4 47.7 9.4 28.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 19.4 11.6 6.2 26.9 6.6 10.6 11.4 13.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.8 0.0 4.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 6.6 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 79.0
HCM 6th LOS E
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

7.7-36
3406
Timings Rich Haven Specific Plan TA (JN:14822)
17: Mill Creek Av. & Riverside Dr. 10/06/2022
HY (2045) With Project Conditions - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc. Page 17
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 132 1340 294 1030 70 22 26 70 17 81 Future Volume (vph) 132 1340 294 1030 70 22 26 70 17 81 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Split NA Perm Split NA Perm
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6
Permitted Phases 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 2 2 2 6 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.0 26.0 9.0 23.0 29.8 29.8 29.8 27.0 27.0 27.0 Total Split (s) 24.0 42.0 29.0 47.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 Total Split (%) 18.5% 32.3% 22.3% 36.2% 24.6% 24.6% 24.6% 20.8% 20.8% 20.8% Yellow Time (s) 3.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 4.8 4.8 4.8 3.0 3.0 3.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 5.8 5.8 5.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None None None None Min Min Min Min Min Min Act Effct Green (s) 13.4 36.3 25.2 48.2 12.8 12.8 12.8 12.7 12.7 12.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.34 0.24 0.45 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.71 0.87 0.84 0.53 0.39 0.11 0.10 0.40 0.09 0.29 Control Delay 65.2 40.3 60.8 24.0 50.1 43.5 0.7 50.7 43.6 3.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 65.2 40.3 60.8 24.0 50.1 43.5 0.7 50.7 43.6 3.3

LOS E D E C D D A D D A
Approach Delay 42.3 31.4 37.8 27.1
Approach LOS D C D C
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 130
Actuated Cycle Length: 107
Natural Cycle: 115
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.87
Intersection Signal Delay: 36.6 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.9% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 17: Mill Creek Av. & Riverside Dr.

7.7-37
3407
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Rich Haven Specific Plan TA (JN:14822) 17: Mill Creek Av. & Riverside Dr. 10/06/2022
HY (2045) With Project Conditions - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc. Page 18
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 132 1340 121 294 1030 137 70 22 26 70 17 81 Future Volume (veh/h) 132 1340 121 294 1030 137 70 22 26 70 17 81 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 140 1426 76 313 1096 98 74 23 -100 74 18 59 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 169 1729 92 343 2190 196 174 193 164 187 209 171 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.35 0.35 0.22 0.46 0.46 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.12 Sat Flow, veh/h 1594 5000 266 1594 4809 430 1594 1772 1502 1590 1772 1456 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 140 1011 491 313 807 387 74 23 -100 74 18 59 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1594 1772 1723 1594 1772 1695 1594 1772 1502 1590 1772 1456 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.0 24.4 24.4 17.9 15.0 15.0 4.1 1.1 0.0 4.0 0.8 3.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.0 24.4 24.4 17.9 15.0 15.0 4.1 1.1 0.0 4.0 0.8 3.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 169 1225 596 343 1614 772 174 193 164 187 209 171 V/C Ratio(X) 0.83 0.82 0.82 0.91 0.50 0.50 0.43 0.12 -0.61 0.40 0.09 0.34 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 341 1366 664 427 1614 772 447 497 421 392 436 359 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 40.9 28.0 28.0 35.8 17.9 17.9 38.9 37.5 0.0 38.1 36.7 37.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.0 3.9 7.7 18.7 0.2 0.5 1.6 0.3 0.0 1.4 0.2 1.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.2 10.0 10.3 8.2 5.5 5.3 1.6 0.5 0.0 1.6 0.4 1.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 44.9 31.9 35.6 54.5 18.2 18.5 40.5 37.8 0.0 39.5 36.9 39.1 LnGrp LOS D C D D B B D D A D D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 1642 1507 -3 151
Approach Delay, s/veh 34.1 25.8 0.0 39.0
Approach LOS C C A D
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.0 24.1 38.3 15.0 13.9 48.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.8 4.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 26.2 25.0 36.0 23.0 20.0 41.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.1 19.9 26.4 6.0 10.0 17.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 0.2 5.9 0.4 0.1 7.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 30.6
HCM 6th LOS C

7.7-38
3408
Timings Rich Haven Specific Plan TA (JN:14822)
22: Hamner Av./Milliken Av. & Riverside Dr. 10/06/2022
HY (2045) With Project Conditions - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc. Page 19
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 328 161 303 109 191 250 482 1443 59 257 1418 504 Future Volume (vph) 328 161 303 109 191 250 482 1443 59 257 1418 504 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.6 16.2 16.2 9.6 16.2 16.2 9.6 35.2 35.2 9.6 16.2 16.2 Total Split (s) 18.4 21.6 21.6 17.0 20.2 20.2 24.0 65.2 65.2 16.2 57.4 57.4 Total Split (%) 15.3% 18.0% 18.0% 14.2% 16.8% 16.8% 20.0% 54.3% 54.3% 13.5% 47.8% 47.8% Yellow Time (s) 3.6 5.2 5.2 3.6 5.2 5.2 3.6 5.2 5.2 3.6 5.2 5.2 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.6 6.2 6.2 4.6 6.2 6.2 4.6 6.2 6.2 4.6 6.2 6.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Act Effct Green (s) 13.8 16.5 16.5 11.3 14.0 14.0 19.4 59.0 59.0 11.6 51.2 51.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.14 0.14 0.09 0.12 0.12 0.16 0.49 0.49 0.10 0.43 0.43 v/c Ratio 0.98 0.70 0.51 0.78 0.98 0.49 0.99 0.88 0.08 0.92 0.99 0.63 Control Delay 95.7 65.9 8.3 85.4 111.3 9.1 88.4 34.3 0.4 88.6 55.9 11.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 95.7 65.9 8.3 85.4 111.3 9.1 88.4 34.3 0.4 88.6 55.9 11.2

LOS F E A F F A F C A F E B
Approach Delay 56.2 59.7 46.4 49.4
Approach LOS E E D D
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Natural Cycle: 120
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.99
Intersection Signal Delay: 50.3 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.8% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 22: Hamner Av./Milliken Av. & Riverside Dr.

7.7-39
3409
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Rich Haven Specific Plan TA (JN:14822) 22: Hamner Av./Milliken Av. & Riverside Dr. 10/06/2022
HY (2045) With Project Conditions - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc. Page 20
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 328 161 303 109 191 250 482 1443 59 257 1418 504 Future Volume (veh/h) 328 161 303 109 191 250 482 1443 59 257 1418 504 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 345 169 161 115 201 131 507 1519 36 271 1493 268 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 356 259 378 136 207 308 515 1742 738 299 1512 632 Arrive On Green 0.17 0.22 0.22 0.13 0.18 0.18 0.24 0.74 0.74 0.15 0.64 0.64 Sat Flow, veh/h 3092 1772 2589 1594 1772 2643 3188 3544 1501 3092 3544 1482 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 345 169 161 115 201 131 507 1519 36 271 1493 268 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1546 1772 1294 1594 1772 1321 1594 1772 1501 1546 1772 1482 Q Serve(g_s), s 13.3 10.4 6.4 8.5 13.5 5.3 19.0 37.8 0.8 10.4 49.4 10.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.3 10.4 6.4 8.5 13.5 5.3 19.0 37.8 0.8 10.4 49.4 10.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 356 259 378 136 207 308 515 1742 738 299 1512 632 V/C Ratio(X) 0.97 0.65 0.43 0.84 0.97 0.42 0.98 0.87 0.05 0.91 0.99 0.42 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 356 259 378 165 207 308 515 1742 738 299 1512 632 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 49.4 44.1 42.5 51.5 49.3 45.9 45.3 13.0 8.1 50.8 21.3 14.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 39.5 5.7 0.8 23.8 54.5 0.9 35.3 5.2 0.0 28.8 20.1 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 6.6 4.6 2.0 4.0 8.5 1.7 9.0 7.9 0.3 4.9 17.0 3.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 89.0 49.8 43.3 75.3 103.8 46.8 80.6 18.1 8.1 79.5 41.4 14.8 LnGrp LOS F D D E F D F B A E D B
Approach Vol, veh/h 675 447 2062 2032
Approach Delay, s/veh 68.3 79.8 33.3 43.0
Approach LOS E E C D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.2 65.2 14.9 23.7 24.0 57.4 18.4 20.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 6.2 4.6 6.2 4.6 6.2 4.6 6.2 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.6 59.0 12.4 15.4 19.4 51.2 13.8 14.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.4 39.8 10.5 12.4 21.0 51.4 15.3 15.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 10.4 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 45.6
HCM 6th LOS D

7.7-40
3410
Timings Rich Haven Specific Plan TA (JN:14822)
23: Hamner Av. & Chino Av. 10/06/2022
HY (2045) With Project Conditions - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc. Page 21
Lane Group EBL NBT SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 1 1905 1855
Future Volume (vph) 1 1905 1855
Turn Type Prot NA NA
Protected Phases 4 2 6
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase 4 2 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5
Total Split (s) 22.5 97.5 97.5
Total Split (%) 18.8% 81.3% 81.3%
Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None Min Min
Act Effct Green (s) 7.6 61.4 61.4
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.95 0.95
v/c Ratio 0.00 0.59 0.61
Control Delay 35.0 2.8 3.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 35.0 2.8 3.0

LOS C A A
Approach Delay 35.0 2.8 3.0
Approach LOS C A A
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 64.3
Natural Cycle: 75
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.61
Intersection Signal Delay: 2.9 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 23: Hamner Av. & Chino Av.

7.7-41
3411
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Rich Haven Specific Plan TA (JN:14822) 23: Hamner Av. & Chino Av. 10/06/2022
HY (2045) With Project Conditions - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc. Page 22
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1 0 0 1905 1855 10
Future Volume (veh/h) 1 0 0 1905 1855 10
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 2093 1 0 2093 2038 11
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 9999 9999 0 2791 2704 15
Arrive On Green 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.75 0.75 0.75
Sat Flow, veh/h 1897708650496727760437248 0 3741 3718 20 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 2093 1 0 2093 998 1051
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1585 0 1870 1777 1867
Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.1 25.3 25.4
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.1 25.3 25.4
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.01
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h262284378112100584562688 0 2791 1326 1393 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.75 0.75
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 438951706624168335474688 0 4470 2123 2231 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.7 5.7 5.7
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.9 0.9
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.2 4.2 4.4
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.1 6.6 6.6
LnGrp LOS A A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 2094 2093 2049
Approach Delay, s/veh 0.0 6.1 6.6
Approach LOS A A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 62.6 15.3 62.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 93.0 18.0 93.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 27.1 2.0 27.4
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 31.0 8.8 28.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 4.2
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

7.7-42
3412
Timings Rich Haven Specific Plan TA (JN:14822)
24: Hamner Av. & Cantu Galleano Ranch Rd. 10/06/2022
HY (2045) With Project Conditions - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc. Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 831 1593 410 451 1637 352 362 466 356 611 826 774 Future Volume (vph) 831 1593 410 451 1637 352 362 466 356 611 826 774 Turn Type Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Perm Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA pm+ov Protected Phases 74538 523167
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 745388523167
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.6 43.5 9.6 9.6 43.5 43.5 9.6 43.2 9.6 9.6 43.2 9.6 Total Split (s) 23.0 43.6 14.0 22.9 43.5 43.5 14.0 44.5 22.9 19.0 49.5 23.0 Total Split (%) 17.7% 33.5% 10.8% 17.6% 33.5% 33.5% 10.8% 34.2% 17.6% 14.6% 38.1% 17.7% Yellow Time (s) 3.6 5.5 3.6 3.6 5.5 5.5 3.6 5.2 3.6 3.6 5.2 3.6 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.6 6.5 4.6 4.6 6.5 6.5 4.6 6.2 4.6 4.6 6.2 4.6 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min None None Min None Act Effct Green (s) 18.6 36.3 49.0 17.9 35.6 35.6 10.8 17.7 37.2 14.5 21.4 41.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.33 0.45 0.16 0.33 0.33 0.10 0.16 0.34 0.13 0.20 0.38 v/c Ratio 1.43 0.67 0.57 0.81 0.70 0.55 1.07 0.53 0.63 1.34 0.58 0.64 Control Delay 237.7 33.4 15.2 56.5 34.3 15.2 116.4 43.3 18.4 205.6 40.9 17.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 237.7 33.4 15.2 56.5 34.3 15.2 116.4 43.3 18.4 205.6 40.9 17.0

LOS FCBECBFDBFDB
Approach Delay 90.7 35.7 58.2 78.1
Approach LOS F D E E
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 130
Actuated Cycle Length: 108.5
Natural Cycle: 120
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.43
Intersection Signal Delay: 67.5 Intersection LOS: E
Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.1% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 24: Hamner Av. & Cantu Galleano Ranch Rd.

7.7-43
3413
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Rich Haven Specific Plan TA (JN:14822) 24: Hamner Av. & Cantu Galleano Ranch Rd. 10/06/2022
HY (2045) With Project Conditions - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc. Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 831 1593 410 451 1637 352 362 466 356 611 826 774 Future Volume (veh/h) 831 1593 410 451 1637 352 362 466 356 611 826 774 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 866 1659 401 470 1705 341 377 485 187 636 860 415 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 648 2561 690 536 2327 493 331 757 453 555 1479 1203 Arrive On Green 0.27 0.51 0.51 0.23 0.47 0.47 0.14 0.20 0.20 0.23 0.30 0.30 Sat Flow, veh/h 3563 7481 1585 3563 7481 1585 3563 5611 1585 3563 7481 3170 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 866 1659 401 470 1705 341 377 485 187 636 860 415 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 18.4 16.4 6.0 12.9 18.7 10.5 9.4 8.0 5.4 15.8 9.9 5.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 18.4 16.4 6.0 12.9 18.7 10.5 9.4 8.0 5.4 15.8 9.9 5.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 648 2561 690 536 2327 493 331 757 453 555 1479 1203 V/C Ratio(X) 1.34 0.65 0.58 0.88 0.73 0.69 1.14 0.64 0.41 1.15 0.58 0.34 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 648 2744 729 644 2736 580 331 2124 839 555 3202 1933 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 36.8 20.2 5.0 38.2 23.6 8.8 43.5 38.1 10.8 38.8 32.0 8.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 161.8 0.5 1.1 10.1 0.9 2.8 92.6 0.9 0.6 85.5 0.4 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 21.1 5.4 1.7 5.6 6.3 4.8 8.0 3.4 2.0 12.4 4.0 1.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 198.6 20.7 6.0 48.3 24.4 11.6 136.1 39.0 11.4 124.3 32.4 8.3 LnGrp LOS F C A D C B F D B F C A
Approach Vol, veh/h 2926 2516 1049 1911
Approach Delay, s/veh 71.3 27.2 69.0 57.7
Approach LOS E C E E
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 20.4 19.9 19.8 41.1 14.0 26.2 23.0 38.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 6.2 4.6 6.5 4.6 6.2 4.6 6.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 14.4 38.3 18.3 37.1 9.4 43.3 18.4 37.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 17.8 10.0 14.9 18.4 11.4 11.9 20.4 20.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.6 0.4 11.8 0.0 8.1 0.0 10.8 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 54.7
HCM 6th LOS D

7.7-44
3414
14822-01 VMT.docx
October 3, 2022
Mr. Craig Cristina
Richland Developers, Inc.
3161 Michelson Drive, Suite 425
Irvine, CA 92615
Mr. Dave Bartlett
Brookcal Ontario, LLC.
3200 Park Center Drive, Suite 1000
Costa Mesa, CA 92626

RICH HAVEN SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT)

ANALYSIS
Mr. Craig Cristina and Mr. Dave Bartlett,
Urban Crossroads, Inc. is pleased to provide the following Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis for the Rich Haven Specific Plan Amendment (2022 Specific Plan Amendment/Project), which is located north of Ontario Ranch Road, south of Riverside Drive, east of Haven Avenue, and on either side of Mill Creek Avenue in the City of Ontario.

PROJECT OVERVIEW
The Rich-Haven Specific Plan (RHSP) was approved by the City of Ontario in 2015, with subsequent Specific Plan Amendments approved in 2016, 2018, and 2021. The current (2021) Rich-Haven Specific Plan (2021 Specific Plan) comprises approximately 584 acres located west of Interstate 15 (I-15), and south of State Route 60 (SR-60). The 2021 Specific Plan Area lies within the 8,200- acre Ontario Ranch area, in the southeast portion of The Ontario Plan (TOP). The 2021 Specific Plan Area is bounded generally by Riverside Drive to the north, “Old” East Edison Avenue [alignment] to the south, Mill Creek Avenue and Hamner Avenue to the east, and Haven Avenue to the west. The location and boundaries of the 2022 RHSP Specific Plan Amendment evaluated in this analysis coincide with the location and boundaries in the 2021 Specific Plan as presented on Exhibit 1.

The 2021 Specific Plan entitlements allow for development of up to 7,194 dwelling units (all residential types), up to 990,902 square feet of commercial/office space, up to 1,183,525 square feet of light industrial uses, approximately 27 acres of public parkland, and approximately 20 acres of Southern California Edison (SCE) Parcel open space and SCE Easements.

Under the proposed 2022 Specific Plan Amendment, the Specific Plan Area would be developed with up to 7,194 dwelling units, up to 925,002 square feet of commercial space, and up to 2,767,148 square feet of light industrial uses. Other existing land uses, e.g., public parkland, Southern California Edison (SCE) Parcel open space and SCE Easements would not be substantively affected under the 2022 Specific Plan Amendment. 3415
Mr. Craig Cristina and Mr. Dave Bartlett
Rich Haven Specific Plan Amendment
October 3, 2022

Page 2 of 9 ends

14822-01 VMT.docx
In summary, the proposed 2022 Specific Plan Amendment would result in the following primary revisions to the 2021 Specific Plan:

1. Total residential development within the Specific Plan would be maintained at 7,194 dwelling units. Residential units and densities would however be reassigned within the Specific Plan.

2. Total commercial development would be reduced by 65,900 square feet (approximately 7 percent reduction from the 2021 Specific Plan commercial entitlements).

3. Total light industrial development would be increased by 1,583,623 square feet (approximately 134 percent increase from the 2021 Specific Plan light industrial entitlements).
3416
Mr. Craig Cristina and Mr. Dave Bartlett
Rich Haven Specific Plan Amendment
October 3, 2022

Page 3 of 9 ends

14822-01 VMT.docx
EXHIBIT 1: 2022 SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT LAND USE PLAN
3417
Mr. Craig Cristina and Mr. Dave Bartlett
Rich Haven Specific Plan Amendment
October 3, 2022

Page 4 of 9 ends

14822-01 VMT.docx

BACKGROUND
Changes to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines were adopted in December 2018, which require all lead agencies to adopt VMT as a replacement for automobile delay-based level of service (LOS) as the measure for identifying transportation impacts for land use projects.

This statewide mandate went into effect July 1, 2020. To aid in this transition, the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) released a Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (December of 2018) (Technical Advisory) (1). Based on the Technical Advisory, the City of Ontario has developed and adopted their own VMT methodologies and thresholds (Resolution No. 2020-071), which were adopted by City Council in June 2020 (City Guidelines) (2).

This VMT analysis has been prepared based on the adopted City Guidelines.

PROJECT LEVEL SCREENING
City’s Guidelines describe that a project may be determined to have a less than significant impact and may be screened out of requiring a project level VMT analysis if it meets at least one of the City’s VMT screening criteria. The City’s adopted VMT screening criteria are described in Table 2 along with a determination of each screening criteria’s applicability to the Project.

TABLE 2: SCREENING FOR LAND USE POJECTS EXEMPT FROM VMT CALCULATIONS Screening Screening Criteria Project Evaluation Result
Transit
Priority
Area
Projects located within a Transit Priority Area (TPA) (i.e., within ½ mile of an existing “major transit stop”1 or an existing stop along a “high-quality transit corridor”2) may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial
evidence to the contrary
Specific Plan Site is not
located within ½ mile of an
existing major transit stop
or along a high-quality
transit corridor.

Does
Not
Meet
Criteria
Low Area
VMT
Projects may be presumed to have a less than significant VMT impact if located in an already low VMT generating traffic analysis zones (TAZs) that generates a VMT per service
population that does not exceed the Citywide average under General Plan Buildout condition VMT per service population.

The Specific Plan is not
located within a low VMT
generating area.

Does
Not
Meet
Criteria
1 Pub. Resources Code, § 21064.3 (“‘Major transit stop’ means a site containing an existing rail transit station, a ferry terminal served by either a bus or rail transit service, or the intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods.”). 2 Pub. Resources Code, § 21155 (“For purposes of this section, a high-quality transit corridor means a corridor with fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute hours.”). 3418
Mr. Craig Cristina and Mr. Dave Bartlett
Rich Haven Specific Plan Amendment
October 3, 2022

Page 5 of 9 ends

14822-01 VMT.docx
TABLE 2 CONT.: SCREENING FOR LAND USE POJECTS EXEMPT FROM VMT CALCULATIONS Screening Screening Criteria Project Evaluation Result
Project
Type
Screening
by Land
Use Type
Projects that meet the criteria describe below can be screened from further VMT review during the CEQA process and are presumed to have less than significant impact upon
transportation (determination to be made by City staff).

1. Local serving retail:
a. Not greater than 50,000 sq. ft. in size
b. Projects with a Neighborhood Commercial TOP Land
Use designation since this designation is intended to
be local serving (Neighborhood Commercial is defined
as “Local serving retail, personal service, office, and dining uses, typically located within a predominantly
residential neighborhood”).

2. Local Serving K – 12 Public Schools (not magnet or charter schools);

3. Local/Neighborhood Parks;

4. Daycare / Childcare/Pre-Kindergarten;

5. Affordable or Supportive Housing;

6. Student Housing on or adjacent to college campuses;

7. Community Institutions (e.g. Public Library, Fire Station, local government facilities);

8. Senior Housing (as defined by HUD) or Assisted Living facilities; HUD defines Senior Housing as projects that are:
a. Provided under any state or federal program that the Secretary of HUD has determined to be specifically
designed and operated to assist elderly persons (as
defined in the state or federal program);
b. Intended for, and solely occupied by persons 62 years of age or older; or
c. Intended and operated for occupancy by persons 55
years of age or older. (most commonly used)
The Specific Plan does not
contain any of the available
land use types that would
qualify for this screening.

Does
not
Meet
Criteria
The 2022 Specific Plan Amendment was not found to meet any of the City’s adopted VMT screening criteria for land use projects. City Guidelines require a project level VMT analysis to be performed.

VMT ANALYSIS

VMT MODELING
The City Guidelines identifies the San Bernardino Traffic Analysis Model (SBTAM) as the appropriate tool for conducting VMT analysis for land use projects in the City of Ontario, as it considers interaction between different land uses based on socio-economic data, such as population, households, and employment. The City of Ontario has recently adopted an updated version of SBTAM also referred to as The Ontario Plan (TOP) model, which contains updated roadway network and socio-economic data within the City of Ontario consistent with the City’s recently adopted TOP and includes a base year of 2019 and a General Plan Buildout of 2050.

Outside of the City of Ontario, the model assumes datasets consistent with the 2016 Southern 3419
Mr. Craig Cristina and Mr. Dave Bartlett
Rich Haven Specific Plan Amendment
October 3, 2022

Page 6 of 9 ends

14822-01 VMT.docx
California Association of Governments (SCAG) Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS). Urban Crossroads has obtained the newly adopted TOP model from the City of Ontario.

VMT METRIC AND SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLD
City Guidelines identifies the efficiency based metric VMT per Service Population (SP) (i.e., population and employees) is to be used to conduct project level VMT analyses for land use projects in the City of Ontario. City Guidelines also identifies the following impact threshold for project level VMT analyses:
• A significant impact would occur if the project VMT per SP exceeds the Citywide average VMT per SP under General Plan Buildout Conditions.

The City of Ontario’s average VMT per SP under General Plan Buildout conditions has been calculated using TOP General Plan Buildout (2050) model. Table 3 provides the City of Ontario’s Citywide average VMT per SP for General Plan Buildout (2050) conditions.

TABLE 3: CITYWIDE VMT PER SERVICE POPULATION
Ontario TOP 2050
Service Population 706,494
VMT 21,689,573
VMT per SP 30.70
As shown in Table 3, the City of Ontario’s VMT per SP for General Plan Buildout (2050) conditions has been calculated as 30.70 VMT per SP.

PROJECT LAND USE CONVERSION
In order to estimate project generated VMT, standard land use information such as dwelling units and building square footage must first be converted into a SBTAM compatible dataset. The SBTAM model utilizes socio-economic data (SED) (e.g., population, households and employment) instead of land use information for the purposes of vehicle trip estimation. Land use information for the Project has been converted to SED and input into a separate traffic analysis zone (TAZ) to isolate the Project’s VMT. Table 4 summarizes the SED inputs used to reflect the Project.

TABLE 4: POPULATION & EMPLOYMENT ESTIMATES
2022 Specific Plan Amendment
Households 7,194
Population 25,179
Employment 5,005

VMT CALCULATION
Origin/Destination VMT Method
The Origin/Destination (OD) method for calculating VMT sums all weekday VMT generated by trips with at least one trip end in the study area (i.e., TAZ or group of TAZ’s). The OD method 3420
Mr. Craig Cristina and Mr. Dave Bartlett
Rich Haven Specific Plan Amendment
October 3, 2022

Page 7 of 9 ends

14822-01 VMT.docx
accounts for all trips (i.e., both passenger car and truck) and trip purposes (i.e., total VMT) and therefore provides a more complete estimate of VMT. Total VMT is then divided by the Project’s SP to derive the efficiency based metric VMT per SP.

Table 5 presents Project generated total OD VMT and the resulting total OD VMT per SP for both Baseline (2022) and General Plan Buildout (2050) conditions. As shown in Table 5, the Project would generate total OD VMT per SP below the City’s adopted impact threshold for both Baseline (2022) and General Plan Buildout Year (2050) conditions.

TABLE 5: PROJECT TOTAL OD VMT
Baseline (2022) General Plan Buildout
Year (2050)
Population 25,179 25,179
Employment 5,005 5,005
Service Population 30,184 30,184
Total OD VMT 679,212 777,191
Total VMT Trucks 33,586 33,586
OD VMT per SP 22.50 25.75
City Threshold 30.70 30.70
Percent Below Threshold -26.71% -16.12%
Potentially Significant? No No
Boundary VMT Method
City Guidelines also acknowledge that a VMT analysis should also contain an evaluation of a project’s effect on VMT, which can be performed using the boundary method of calculating VMT.

The boundary method is the sum of all weekday VMT on the roadway network within a designated boundary (i.e., City boundary or other designated geographic area). The boundary method estimates VMT by multiplying vehicle trips on each roadway segment within the boundary by that segment’s length. This approach consists of all trips, including those trips that do not begin or end in the designated boundary. Consistent with City Guidelines, the City of Ontario was used as the boundary for this assessment. In addition, as the Project is located near the southeastern edge of the City of Ontario, an additional assessment of a ten-mile boundary area surrounding the Project site has also been conducted to ensure trips associated with the Project are not omitted.

Table 6 presents total VMT calculated using the boundary method for No Project (i.e., 2021 Specific Plan) and With Project (i.e., 2022 Specific Plan Amendment) General Plan Buildout (2050) conditions. Boundary VMT is higher under the 2022 Specific Plan Amendment scenario for both the City of Ontario boundary and 10-mile boundary of the Project, but similarly to the OD VMT per SP results, the Boundary VMT per SP is lower under the proposed Project. 3421
Mr. Craig Cristina and Mr. Dave Bartlett
Rich Haven Specific Plan Amendment
October 3, 2022

Page 8 of 9 ends

14822-01 VMT.docx
TABLE 6: GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT (2050) BOUNDARY VMT RESULTS City Boundary 10-Mile Boundary
Scenario No Project With Project No Project With Project Service Population 719,661 721,445 2,276,901 2,278,685
Boundary VMT 9,670,427 9,687,140 35,863,716 35,892,228
VMT per SP 13.44 13.43 15.75 15.75
Change in VMT -0.01 0.00
Potentially Significant? No No

SUMMARY
Based on the results of this analysis the following findings are made:
• The 2022 Specific Plan Amendment was evaluated against screening criteria as outlined in the City Guidelines. The 2022 Specific Plan Amendment was not found to meet any available screening criteria, and a VMT analysis was performed. • The 2022 Specific Plan Amendment’s VMT analysis found the 2022 Specific Plan Amendment to be below the City’s VMT per service population threshold by 26.71% for baseline (2022) conditions and 16.12% for buildout (2050) conditions. • In addition, the 2022 Specific Plan Amendment cumulative effect on VMT was also found to reduce the City’s VMT per SP with the inclusion of the 2022 Specific Plan Amendment, which indicates that the 2022 Specific Plan Amendment is a more efficient land use plan.
• The 2022 Specific Plan Amendment is found to have a less than significant impact. 3422
Mr. Craig Cristina and Mr. Dave Bartlett
Rich Haven Specific Plan Amendment
October 3, 2022

Page 9 of 9 ends

14822-01 VMT.docx
If you have any questions, please contact me directly at [email protected].

Respectfully submitted,
URBAN CROSSROADS, INC.

Alexander So
Senior Associate
3423
14822-01 VMT.docx

REFERENCES

1. Office of Planning and Research. Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA. State of California : s.n., December 2018.

2. City of Ontario. SB 743 VMT Thresholds. City of Ontario : s.n., June 2020. 3424
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022
Amendment

AIR QUALITY IMPACT ANALYSIS

CITY OF ONTARIO
PREPARED BY:

Haseeb Qureshi
[email protected]
Michael Tirohn
[email protected]
NOVEMBER 8, 2022
14822-04 AQ Report
3425
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 3426
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS........................................................................................................................... III APPENDICES........................................................................................................................................IV LIST OF EXHIBITS................................................................................................................................. IV LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................................IV LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS ............................................................................................................VII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... 1 ES.1 Summary of Findings..................................................................................................................... 1 ES.2 Standard Regulatory Requirements .............................................................................................. 2 ES.3 Project Mitigation Measures......................................................................................................... 3 1 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 10

1.1 Background and Project Description .......................................................................................... 10 2 AIR QUALITY SETTING ............................................................................................................... 16

2.1 South Coast Air Basin .................................................................................................................. 16

2.2 Regional Climate ......................................................................................................................... 16

2.3 Wind Patterns and Project Location ........................................................................................... 17

2.4 Criteria Pollutants ....................................................................................................................... 18

2.5 Existing Air Quality ...................................................................................................................... 25

2.6 Regional Air Quality .................................................................................................................... 28

2.7 Local Air Quality .......................................................................................................................... 28

2.8 Regional Air Quality Improvement ............................................................................................. 29 3 REGULATORY BACKGROUND..................................................................................................... 41

3.1 Federal Regulations..................................................................................................................... 41

3.2 California Regulations................................................................................................................. 41 4 SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS ...................................................................................................... 47

4.1 Regional Significance Thresholds................................................................................................ 47

4.2 Localized Significance Thresholds............................................................................................... 47 5 AIR QUALITY IMPACTS .............................................................................................................. 54

5.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 54

5.2 Methodology............................................................................................................................... 54

5.3 Regional Construction Emissions................................................................................................ 54

5.4 Regional Operational Emissions.................................................................................................. 59

5.5 Construction-Source Localized Emissions................................................................................... 65

5.6 Operational-Source Localized Emissions .................................................................................... 66

5.7 CO “Hot Spot” Analysis ............................................................................................................... 67

5.8 Air Quality Management Planning.............................................................................................. 69

5.9 Potential Impacts to Sensitive Receptors ................................................................................... 71

5.11 Odors........................................................................................................................................... 72

5.12 Cumulative Impacts .................................................................................................................... 73 6 REFERENCES.............................................................................................................................. 75 7 CERTIFICATIONS........................................................................................................................ 79 This page intentionally left blank
3427
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
iv

APPENDICES
APPENDIX 2.1: STATE/FEDERAL ATTAINMENT STATUS OF CRITERIA POLLUTANTS APPENDIX 5.1: CALEEMOD CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS – WITHOUT MITIGATION APPENDIX 5.2: CALEEMOD CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS – WITH MITIGATION APPENDIX 5.3: CALEEMOD OPERATIONS EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS APPENDIX 5.4: CALEEMOD OPERATIONS EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS – LSTS APPENDIX 5.5: AERMOD LST MODELING OUTPUTS – CONSTRUCTION APPENDIX 5.6: AERMOD LST MODELING OUTPUTS - OPERATION

LIST OF EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT 1-A: LOCATION MAP ............................................................................................................ 13 EXHIBIT 1-B: LAND USE PLAN ............................................................................................................ 14 EXHIBIT 2-A: DPM AND DIESEL VEHICLE MILES TREND........................................................................ 38 EXHIBIT 4-A: SENSITIVE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ................................................................................. 52

LIST OF TABLES
TABLE ES-1: SUMMARY OF CEQA SIGNIFICANCE FINDINGS.................................................................. 1 TABLE 1-1: PHASE 1 LAND USES.......................................................................................................... 11 TABLE 1-2: PHASE 2 LAND USES.......................................................................................................... 12 TABLE 2-1: CRITERIA POLLUTANTS ..................................................................................................... 18 TABLE 2-2: AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS (1 OF 2) .................................................................... 26 TABLE 2-2: AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS (2 OF 2) .................................................................... 27 TABLE 2-3: ATTAINMENT STATUS OF CRITERIA POLLUTANTS IN THE SCAB ......................................... 28 TABLE 2-4: PROJECT AREA AIR QUALITY MONITORING SUMMARY 2018-2020.................................... 29 TABLE 2-5: SCAB O3 TREND................................................................................................................. 31 TABLE 2-6: SCAB AVERAGE 24-HOUR CONCENTRATION PM10 TREND (BASED ON FEDERAL STANDARD)1 ................................................................................................................................................. 32 TABLE 2-7: SCAB ANNUAL AVERAGE CONCENTRATION PM10 TREND (BASED ON STATE STANDARD)1 . 33
TABLE 2-8: SCAB 24-HOUR AVERAGE CONCENTRATION PM2.5 TREND (BASED ON FEDERAL STANDARD)1 ................................................................................................................................................. 33 TABLE 2-9: SCAB ANNUAL AVERAGE CONCENTRATION PM2.5 TREND (BASED ON STATE STANDARD)1 . 34
TABLE 2-10: SCAB 8-HOUR AVERAGE CONCENTRATION CO TREND1 ................................................... 35 TABLE 2-11: SCAB 1-HOUR AVERAGE CONCENTRATION NO2 TREND (BASED ON FEDERAL STANDARD)36 TABLE 2-12: SCAB 1-HOUR AVERAGE CONCENTRATION NO2 TREND (BASED ON STATE STANDARD)... 36 TABLE 4-1: MAXIMUM DAILY REGIONAL EMISSIONS THRESHOLDS..................................................... 47 TABLE 5-1: CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE............................................................................................... 56 TABLE 5-2: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ASSUMPTIONS.................................................................... 56 TABLE 5-3: CONSTRUCTION TRIP ASSUMPTIONS ................................................................................ 57 TABLE 5-4: MAXIMUM DAILY CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS – WITHOUT MITIGATION......................... 58 TABLE 5-5: MAXIMUM DAILY CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS – WITH MITIGATION................................ 59 TABLE 5-6: PASSENGER CAR FLEET MIX .............................................................................................. 62 TABLE 5-7: TRUCK FLEET MIX ............................................................................................................. 62 TABLE 5-8: SUMMARY OF PEAK OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS – PHASE 1 (2024)..................................... 64 3428
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
v
TABLE 5-9: SUMMARY OF PEAK OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS – PROJECT BUILDOUT (2027)................... 65 TABLE 5-10: LOCALIZED SIGNIFICANCE SUMMARY – PEAK CONSTRUCTION (WITH MITIGATION)........ 66 TABLE 5-11: LOCALIZED SIGNIFICANCE SUMMARY – OPERATION (PROJECT BUILDOUT) ..................... 66 TABLE 5-12: CO MODEL RESULTS........................................................................................................ 67 TABLE 5-13: TRAFFIC VOLUMES.......................................................................................................... 68 TABLE 5-14: OPENING YEAR CUMULATIVE (2027) WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES ......................... 69 3429
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
vi
This page intentionally left blank
3430
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
vii

LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS
% Percent
°F Degrees Fahrenheit
(1) Reference
µg/m3 Microgram per Cubic Meter
1992 CO Plan 1992 Federal Attainment Plan for Carbon Monoxide 1993 CEQA Handbook SCAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook (1993) 2003 AQMP SCAQMD’s 2003 Air Quality Management Plan
2016 AQMP SCAQMD’s Final 2019 Air Quality Management Plan 2016-2040 RTP/SCS 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy
AB 2595 California Clean Air Act
AQIA Air Quality Impact Analysis
AQMP Air Quality Management Plan
BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District
BC Black Carbon
C2Cl4 Perchloroethylene
C4H6 1,3-butadiene
C6H6 Benzene
C2H3Cl Vinyl Chloride
C2H4O Acetaldehyde
CAA Federal Clean Air Act
CAAQS California Ambient Air Quality Standards
CalEEMod California Emissions Estimator Model
CalEPA California Environmental Protection Agency
CALGreen California Green Building Standards Code
CAP Climate Action Plan
CAPCOA California Air Pollution Control Officers Association CARB California Air Resources Board
CCR California Code of Regulations
CEC California Energy Commission
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CEQA Guidelines 2019 CEQA Statute and Guidelines
CH2O Formaldehyde
City City of Ontario
CO Carbon Monoxide
COH Coefficient of Haze
3431
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
viii
COHb Carboxyhemoglobin
Cr(VI) Chromium
CTP Clean Truck Program
Cr(VI) Chromium
CRRC Cool Roof Rating Council
CTP Clean Truck Program
CY Cubic Yards
DPM Diesel Particulate Matter
DRRP Diesel Risk Reduction Plan
EC Elemental Carbon
EIR Environmental Impact Reports
EMFAC EMissions FACtor Model
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
ETW Equivalent Test Weight
EV Electric Vehicles
g/L Grams Per Liter
GHG Greenhouse Gas
GVWR Gross Vehicle Weight Rating
H2S Hydrogen Sulfide
HDT Heavy Duty Trucks
HI Hazard Index
HHDT Heavy-Heavy-Duty Trucks
hp Horsepower
ITE Institute of Transportation Engineers
lbs Pounds
lbs/day Pounds Per Day
LDA Light Duty Auto
LDT1/LDT2 Light-Duty Trucks
LHDT Light-Heavy-Duty Trucks
LST Localized Significance Threshold
LST METHODOLOGY Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology MATES Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study
MDV Medium-Duty Vehicles
MHDT Medium-Heavy-Duty Trucks
MICR Maximum Individual Cancer Risk
MM Mitigation Measures
MW Megawatt
MWELO California Department of Water Resources’ Model Water 3432
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
ix
Efficient
N2 Nitrogen
N2O Nitrous Oxide
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NO Nitric Oxide
NO2 Nitrogen Dioxide
NOX Nitrogen Oxides
O2 Oxygen
O3 Ozone
O2 Deficiency Chronic Hypoxemia
OBD-II On-Board Diagnostic
OPR Office of Planning and Research
Pb Lead
PM10 Particulate Matter 10 microns in diameter or less
PM2.5 Particulate Matter 2.5 microns in diameter or less POLA Port of Los Angeles
POLB Port of Long Beach
ppm Parts Per Million
Project Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment
RECLAIM Regional Clean Air Incentives Market
RFG-2 Reformulated Gasoline Regulation
ROG Reactive Organic Gases
RTP Regional Transportation Plan
SCAB South Coast Air Basin
SCAG Southern California Association of Governments
SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District
SCAQMD Rule 403 Fugitive Dust
SCAQMD Rule 1113 Architectural Coating
SCS Sustainable Communities Strategy
sf Square Feet
SIPs State Implementation Plans
SO2 Sulfur Dioxide
SO4 Sulfates
SOX Sulfur Oxides
SRA Source Receptor Area
TAC Toxic Air Contaminant
TAZ Traffic Analysis Zone
TDM Transportation Demand Management
3433
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
x
TITLE I Non-Attainment Provisions
TITLE II Mobile Sources Provisions
TRU Transport Refrigeration Unit
UFP Ultra Fine Particles
UTRs Utility Tractors
VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled
VOC Volatile Organic Compounds
vph Vehicles Per Hour
3434
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
xi
This page intentionally left blank
3435
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ES.1 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
The results of this Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis (AQIA) are summarized below based on the significance criteria in Section 3 of this report consistent with Appendix G of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines(CEQA Guidelines) as implemented by the City (1). Table ES-1 shows the findings of significance for each potential air quality impact under CEQA before and after any required mitigation described below. It is noted here that the extent and degree of construction-source emissions is largely a byproduct of the construction schedule. The duration of Project construction activities would need to be protracted by an estimated additional 67 percent of the current Project construction schedule.1 This may achieve the most restrictive construction-source emissions threshold [NOx], but in so doing would only prolong the duration of air quality emissions, the duration of constructionsource equipment noise, and the duration of general disturbances associated with construction activities. The Lead Agency has determined that the benefits of the Project’s current construction schedule outweigh the potential benefit in a temporary decrease in air quality emissions that may be achieved through a protracted Project construction schedule. Moreover, accepted air quality modeling parameters do not provide for such an assumed extended construction period.

Alternatively, in order to reduce Project construction-source air quality emissions to levels that would preclude exceedance of all SCAQMD thresholds would require use of construction equipment or construction technologies that are not currently available or that would be available in the near-term. In this regard, use of alternative fuel construction equipment, including electric-powered equipment, is not feasible at this time as such equipment is not commercially available, and is not expected to be in the near-term. For these reasons, there are no feasible means or alternatives to avoid this impact or reduce the impact to levels that would be less-than-significant.

TABLE ES-1: SUMMARY OF CEQA SIGNIFICANCE FINDINGS
Analysis Report
Section
Significance Findings
Unmitigated Mitigation
Measure Mitigated1
Regional Construction Emissions 5.3 Potentially Significant (VOCs, NOX, and CO)
MM AQ-1
through
MM AQ-6
Significant and
Unavoidable
(NOX and CO)
Localized Construction Emissions 5.5 Less Than Significant n/a n/a Regional Operational Emissions 5.4 Potentially Significant MM AQ-7 through
Significant and
Unavoidable
1 Maximum daily construction-source NOx emissions [mitigated] = 165.30 lbs/day. NOx threshold = 55 lbs./day. Assuming roughly linear reduction necessary to meet threshold condition = 55/165.30 = 0.33 of maximum daily NOx emissions = 67 percent reduction in VOC emissions = 67 percent extension of Project construction schedule. 3436
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
2 Analysis Report
Section
Significance Findings
Unmitigated Mitigation
Measure Mitigated1
(VOCs, NOX, CO, PM10,
PM2.5)
MM AQ-20 (VOCs, NOX, CO, PM10,
PM2.5)
Localized Operational Emissions 5.6 Less Than Significant n/a n/a CO “Hot Spot” Analysis 5.7 Less Than Significant n/a n/a Air Quality Management Plan 5.8 Potentially Significant MM AQ-1
through
MM AQ-20
Significant and
Unavoidable
Regional Transportation Plan/
Sustainable Communities Strategy 5.9 Less Than Significant n/a n/a Sensitive Receptors 5.10 Less Than Significant n/a n/a
Odors 5.11 Less Than Significant n/a n/a
Cumulative Impacts 5.12 Potentially Significant
MM AQ-1
through
MM AQ-20
Significant and
Unavoidable
ES.2 STANDARD REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
There are numerous requirements that development projects must comply with by law, and that were put in place by federal, State, and local regulatory agencies for the improvement of air quality. Required by South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rules, the two most pertinent regulatory requirements that apply during construction activity for the proposed Project include but are not limited to Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust) (2) and Rule 1113 (Architectural Coatings) (3). As such, credit for Rule 403 and Rule 1113 have been taken in the analysis.

SCAQMDRULE 401
A person shall not discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emission whatsoever any air contaminant for a period or periods aggregating more than three minutes in any 1 hour that is as dark or darker in shade as that designated No. 1 on the Ringelmann Chart, as published by the U.S. Bureau of Mines.

SCAQMDRULE 402
A person shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material that cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or that endanger the comfort, repose, health, or safety of any such persons or the public, or that cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property. The provisions of this rule do not apply to odors emanating from agricultural operations necessary for the growing of crops or the raising of fowl or animals. 3437
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
3 SCAQMDRULE 403
This rule is intended to reduce the amount of particulate matter entrained in the ambient air as a result of anthropogenic (human-made) fugitive dust sources by requiring actions to prevent and reduce fugitive dust emissions. Rule 403 applies to any activity or human-made condition capable of generating fugitive dust and requires best available control measures to be applied to earth moving and grading activities.

SCAQMDRULE 445
The purpose of this rule is to reduce the amount of particulate matter from wood-burning devices, including stoves and fireplaces. In accordance with Rule 445, no wood-burning devices will be installed in any dwelling units.

SCAQMDRULE 1113
This rule serves to limit the Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) content of architectural coatings used on projects in the SCAQMD. Any person who supplies, sells, offers for sale, or manufactures any architectural coating for use on projects in the SCAQMD must comply with the current VOC standards set in this rule.

SCAQMDRULE 1301
This rule is intended to provide that pre-construction review requirements to ensure that new or relocated facilities do not interfere with progress in attainment of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), while future economic growth within the SCAQMD is not unnecessarily restricted. The specific air quality goal is to achieve no net increases from new or modified permitted sources of nonattainment air contaminants or their precursors. Rule 1301 also limits emission increases of ammonia, and Ozone Depleting Compounds (ODCs) from new, modified or relocated facilities by requiring the use of Best Available Control Technology (BACT).

ES.3 PROJECT MITIGATION MEASURES
ES.3.1 CONSTRUCTION-SOURCE EMISSIONS MMS
Without mitigation, Project construction-source emissions would exceed SCAQMD regional criteria pollutant thresholds for VOC’s, NOx and CO. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented as means of reducing construction-source emissions to the extent feasible.

However, due to the large scale of the proposed Project, even with application of mitigation, Project construction-source emissions would exceed SCAQMD regional criteria pollutant thresholds for NOx and CO. These impacts are therefore significant and unavoidable.

MM AQ-1
Fugitive dust control measures that surpassing SCAQMD Rule 403 minimum requires shall be implemented. Such measures include: use of nontoxic soil stabilizers, applying water every four hours to active soil disturbing activities and tarping and/or maintaining a minimum of 24 inches of freeboard on trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials. 3438
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
4 MM AQ-2
Construction equipment rated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as having Tier 3 or higher exhaust emission limits shall be utilized.

MM AQ-3
Construction equipment shall be properly serviced and maintained to the manufacturer’s standards.

MM AQ-4
Nonessential idling of construction equipment shall be limited to no more than five consecutive minutes.

MM AQ-5
Super-Compliant VOC paints for coating of architectural surfaces shall be used whenever possible.

MM AQ-6
The construction contractor shall use off-road diesel construction equipment that complies with EPA/CARB Tier 4 Interim or better emissions standards during all construction phases.

ES.3.2 OPERATIONAL-SOURCE EMISSIONS MMS
Without mitigation, Project operational-source emissions would exceed SCAQMD regional criteria pollutant thresholds for VOC’s, NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented as means of reducing operational-source emissionsto the extent feasible. in California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod), there is no way to meaningfully quantify potential emissions reductions that would result from application of the proposed mitigation. Therefore, no emissions reduction credit for mitigation has been taken in this analysis.

It is noted here that Project operational-source NOX, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 emissions exceedances are largely the product of traffic (mobile sources) accessing the Project site. Neither the Project Applicant nor the City have regulatory authority to control tailpipe emissions from these mobile sources. No feasible MMs beyond the measures identified herein exist that would reduce operational-source NOx and CO emissions to levels that would be less-than-significant.

With regard to VOC emissions, it is recognized that approximately 50 percent of operationalsource VOC emissions would be generated by on-site sources, including natural gas usage, consumer products, landscape equipment, gasoline dispensing, and onsite equipment usage associated with the industrial portion of the Project. Approximately 60% of onsite VOC emissions are generated through the use of consumer products by future residents and building users. As such, the Project applicant cannot meaningfully control the use of consumer products through mitigation.
3439
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
5 The following measures (MM AQ-7 through MM AQ-20) are designed to reduce Project operational-source criteria pollutant emissions exceedances noted above. These measures would also act to reduce Project operational-source criteria pollutant emissions generally. Even with application of MM AQ-7 through MM AQ-20, Project operational-source emissions impacts (CO, NOx, and VOC) would be significant and unavoidable.

MM AQ-7
Legible, durable, weather-proof signs shall be placed at truck access gates, loading docks, and truck parking areas that identify applicable CARB anti-idling regulations. At a minimum, each sign shall include: 1) instructions for truck drivers to shut off engines when not in use; 2) instructions for drivers of diesel trucks to restrict idling to no more than five (5) minutes once the vehicle is stopped, the transmission is set to "neutral" or "park," and the parking brake is engaged; and 3) telephone numbers of the building facilities manager and the CARB to report violations. Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit, the City shall conduct a site inspection to ensure that the signs are in place.

MM AQ-8
Prior to tenant occupancy, the Project Applicant or successor(s) in interest shall provide documentation to the City demonstrating that occupants/tenants of the Project site have been provided documentation on funding opportunities, such as the Carl Moyer Program, that provide incentives for using cleaner-than-required engines and equipment.

MM AQ-9
Prior to the issuing of each building permit, the Project Applicant, successor(s) in interest, and contractors shall provide plans and specifications to the City that demonstrate that each project building is designed for passive heating and cooling and is designed to include natural light.

Features designed to achieve this shall include the proper placement of windows, overhangs, and skylights.

MM AQ-10
Prior to the issuing of each building permit, the Project Applicant, successor(s) in interest, and contractors shall provide plans and specifications to the City that demonstrate that electrical service is provided to each of the areas in the vicinity of the building that are to be landscaped in order that electrical equipment may be used for landscape maintenance.

MM AQ-11
Once constructed, the Project Applicant, successor(s) in interest shall ensure that all building tenants shall utilize electric equipment for landscape maintenance to the extent feasible, through requirements in the lease agreements.

MM AQ-12
Once constructed, through requirements in the lease agreements, the Project Applicant or successors in interest shall ensure that all building tenants shall utilize only electric or natural gas service yard trucks (hostlers), pallet jacks and forklifts, and other onsite equipment, through requirements in the lease agreements. Electric-powered service yard trucks (hostlers), pallet 3440
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
6 jacks and forklifts, and other onsite equipment shall also be required instead of diesel-powered equipment, if technically feasible. Yard trucks may be diesel fueled in lieu of electrically or natural gas fueled provided such yard trucks are at least compliant with California Air Resources Board (CARB) 2010 standards for on-road vehicles or CARB Tier 4 compliant for off-road vehicles.

MM AQ-13
Through requirements in the lease agreements, tenants that do not already operate 2010 and newer trucks shall apply in good faith for funding to replace/retrofit their trucks. Funding mechanisms include Carl Moyer, VIP, Prop 1B, SmartWay Finance, or other similar funds. If awarded, the tenant shall be required to accept and use the funding. Tenants shall be encouraged to consider the use of alternative fueled trucks as well as new or retrofitted diesel trucks. Tenants shall also be encouraged to become SmartWay Partners, if eligible. This measure shall not apply to trucks that are not owned or operated by the facility operator or facility tenants since it would be infeasible to prohibit access to the site by any truck that is otherwise legal to operate on California roads and highways.

MM AQ-14
Through requirements in the lease agreements, tenants who employ 250 or more employees on a full- or part-time basis shall comply with SCAQMD Rule 2202, On-Road Motor Vehicle Mitigation Options. The purpose of this rule is to provide employees with a menu of options to reduce employee commute vehicle emissions. Tenants with less than 250 employees or tenants with 250 or more employees who are exempt from SCAQMD Rule 2202 (as stated in the Rule) shall either (a) join with a tenant who is implementing a program in accordance with Rule 2202 or (b) implement an emission reduction program similar to Rule 2202 with annual reporting of actions and results to the City. The tenant-implemented program would include, but not be limited to the following:
• Appoint a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) coordinator who would promote the TDM program, activities and features to all employees.
• Create and maintain a “commuter club” to manage subsidies or incentives for employees who carpool, vanpool, bicycle, walk, or take transit to work. • Inform employees of public transit and commuting services available to them (e.g., social media, signage).
• Provide on-site transit pass sales and discounted transit passes. • Guarantee a ride home.
• Offer shuttle service to and from public transit and commercial areas/food establishments, if warranted.

MM AQ-15
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Project Applicant or successor(s) in interest shall provide evidence to the City that loading docks are designed to be compatible with SmartWay trucks.
3441
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
7 MM AQ-16
Upon occupancy and annually thereafter, the Project Applicant or successor(s) in interest shall provide the following information to all tenants:
• Building energy efficiency, solid waste reduction, recycling, and water conservation. • Vehicle GHG emissions, electric vehicle charging availability, and alternate transportation opportunities for commuting.
• Participation in the Voluntary Interindustry Commerce Solutions (VICS) “Empty Miles” program to improve goods trucking efficiencies.
• Health effects of diesel particulates, State regulations limiting truck idling time, and the benefits of minimized idling.
• The importance of minimizing traffic, noise, and air pollutant impacts to any residences in the Project vicinity.
•
Tenants shall ensure that the above information is provided to employees and truck drivers as appropriate.

MM AQ-17
Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Project Applicant or successor(s) in interest shall provide the City with an onsite signage program that clearly identifies the required onsite circulation system. This shall be accomplished through posted signs and painting on driveways and internal roadways.

MM AQ-18
Prior to issuance of an occupancy permit, the City shall confirm that signs clearly identifying approved trucks have been installed along any truck routes to and from the project site.

MM AQ-19
Prior to issuance of an occupancy permit(s) for commercial/retail/industrial tenants, tenants shall install (a) sign(s) on their respective property(ies) with telephone, email, and regular mail contact information for a designated tenant representative (representative) who would receive complaints about excessive noise, dust, fumes, or odors. The sign shall also identify contact data for the City for perceived Code violations. The representative shall keep records of any complaints received and actions taken to communicate with the complainant and resolve the complaint. The representative shall endeavor to resolve complaints within 24 hours.

MM AQ-20
Prior to issuance of a building permit for the Project industrial uses, the Project Applicant or successor(s) in interest shall provide the City with site and building specifications, drawings, and calculations that demonstrate that main electrical supply lines and panels have been sized to 3442
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
8 support heavy truck charging facilities when these trucks become available. The calculations shall be based on reasonable predictions from currently available truck manufacturer’s data. 3443
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
9 This page intentionally left blank
3444
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
10 1 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of the AQIA prepared by Urban Crossroads, Inc., for the proposed Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment (2022 Specific Plan Amendment, Project). The purpose of this AQIA is to evaluate the potential impacts to air quality associated with construction and operation of the Project and recommend measures to mitigate impacts considered potentially significant in comparison to thresholds established by the SCAQMD.

1.1 BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Rich-Haven Specific Plan (RHSP) was approved by the City of Ontario in 2015, with subsequent Specific Plan Amendments approved in 2016, 2018, and 2021. The current (2021) Rich-Haven Specific Plan (“2021 Specific Plan”) comprises approximately 584 acres located west of Interstate 15 (I-15), and south of State Route 60 (SR-60). The 2021 Specific Plan Area lies within the 8,200-acre Ontario Ranch area, bounded generally by Riverside Drive to the north, “Old” East Edison Avenue [alignment] to the south, Mill Creek Avenue and Hamner Avenue to the east, and Haven Avenue to the west. The location and boundaries of the 2022 RHSP Specific Plan Amendment evaluated herein coincide with the location and boundaries in the 2021 Specific Plan. The location of the Project is presented at Exhibit 1-A.

Under the proposed 2022 RHSP Specific Plan Amendment, the Specific Plan Area would be developed with up to 7,194 dwelling units, up to 925,002 square feet of commercial space, and up to 2,767,148 square feet of light industrial uses. Other existing RHSP land uses, e.g., public parkland, Southern California Edison (SCE) Parcel open space and SCE Easements would not be substantively affected under the 2022 RHSP Specific Plan Amendment. This EIR evaluates potential environmental impacts of entire buildout of the Specific Plan Area that would result from the 2022 RHSP Specific Plan Amendment.

In summary, the proposed 2022 Specific Plan Amendment would result in the following primary revisions to the 2021 Specific Plan:

1. Total residential development within the Specific Plan Area would be maintained at 7,194 dwelling units. Residential units and residential densities would however be reassigned within the Specific Plan Area.

2. Total commercial development would be reduced by approximately 65,900 square feet, an approximate 6.7 percent reduction in the 2021 Specific Plan commercial entitlements.

3. Total light industrial development would be increased by approximately 1,583,623 square feet, an approximate 134 percent increase from the 2021 Specific Plan Amendment. 3445
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
11 Other aspects and attributes of the 2021 Specific Plan would be substantively maintained under the proposed 2022 Specific Plan Amendment.

Note that portions of Planning Areas 3A and 4A within the Project site have been developed.

Planning Areas 2, 3, 4A, 5C, 6, 10, and portions of 7, 8, and 9 are anticipated to be developed as part of the first phase with an anticipated Opening Year of 2024. Project Buildout and of Phase 2 is anticipated in Year 2027. Project Planning Areas and Phases are illustrated at Exhibit 1-B.

Table 1-1 presents the land uses that were assumed to be developed as part of Phase 1.

TABLE 1-1: PHASE 1 LAND USES
Land Use Qty Units
Business Park 316.725 TSF
High-Cube Cold Storage 454.244 TSF
High-Cube Fulfillment 1,404.417 TSF
High-Cube Transload 591.763 TSF
Multifamily (Low Rise) Residential 3,289 DU
Single Family Detached Residential 822 DU
Public Park 1.3 AC
Strip Retail 7.500 TSF
Gasoline Station 48 VFP
Shopping Center 162.137 TSF
High Turnover Restaurant 32.427 TSF
Fast Food Restaurant w/Drive Through 21.618 TSF
TSF = Thousand Square Feet
DU = Dwelling Units
AC = Acre
VFP = Vehicle Fueling Position
Table 1-2 presents the land uses that would be developed as part of Phase 2. 3446
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
12 TABLE 1-2: PHASE 2 LAND USES
Land Use Qty Units
Multifamily (Low Rise) Residential 2,000 DU
Single Family Detached Residential 603 DU
Public Park 27 AC
Gasoline Station 48 VFP
Shopping Center 525.990 TSF
High Turnover Restaurant 105.198 TSF
Fast Food Restaurant w/Drive Through 70.132 TSF
TSF = Thousand Square Feet
DU = Dwelling Units
AC = Acre
VFP = Vehicle Fueling Position
According to the Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Traffic Analysis, at buildout following the development of Phases 1 and 2, the proposed Project is anticipated to generate a total of 95,552 two-way vehicle trips per day including 94,408 two-way passenger vehicle trips and 1,144 two-way truck trips per day (in actual vehicles) (4). 3447
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
13 EXHIBIT 1-A: LOCATION MAP
3448
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
14 EXHIBIT 1-B: LAND USE PLAN
3449
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
15 This page intentionally left blank
3450
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
16 2 AIR QUALITY SETTING
This section provides an overview of the existing air quality conditions in the Project area and region.

2.1 SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN
The Project site is located in the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) within the jurisdiction of SCAQMD (5). The SCAQMD was created by the 1977 Lewis-Presley Air Quality Management Act, which merged four county air pollution control bodies into one regional district. Under the Act, the SCAQMD is responsible for bringing air quality in areas under its jurisdiction into conformity with federal and state air quality standards. As previously stated, the Project site is located within the SCAB, a 6,745-square mile subregion of the SCAQMD, which includes the non-desert portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties, and all of Orange County.

The SCAB is bounded by the Pacific Ocean to the west and the San Gabriel, San Bernardino, and San Jacinto Mountains to the north and east, and the San Diego Air Basin to the south.

2.2 REGIONAL CLIMATE
The regional climate has a substantial influence on air quality in the SCAB. In addition, the temperature, wind, humidity, precipitation, and amount of sunshine influence the air quality.

The annual average temperatures throughout the SCAB vary from the low to middle 60s degrees Fahrenheit (°F). Due to a decreased marine influence, the eastern portion of the SCAB shows greater variability in average annual minimum and maximum temperatures. January is the coldest month throughout the SCAB, with average minimum temperatures of 47°F in downtown Los Angeles and 36°F in San Bernardino. All portions of the SCAB have recorded maximum temperatures above 100°F.

Although the climate of the SCAB can be characterized as semi-arid, the air near the land surface is quite moist on most days because of the presence of a marine layer. This shallow layer of sea air is an important modifier of SCAB climate. Humidity restricts visibility in the SCAB, and the conversion of sulfur dioxide (SO2) to sulfates(SO4) is heightened in air with high relative humidity.

The marine layer provides an environment for that conversion process, especially during the spring and summer months. The annual average relative humidity within the SCAB is 71 percent (%) along the coast and 59% inland. Since the ocean effect is dominant, periods of heavy early morning fog are frequent and low stratus clouds are a characteristic feature. These effects decrease with distance from the coast.

More than 90% of the SCAB’s rainfall occurs from November through April. The annual average rainfall varies from approximately nine inches in Riverside to fourteen inches in downtown Los Angeles. Monthly and yearly rainfall totals are extremely variable. Summer rainfall usually consists of widely scattered thunderstorms near the coast and slightly heavier shower activity in the eastern portion of the SCAB with frequency being higher near the coast. 3451
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
17 Due to its generally clear weather, about three-quarters of available sunshine is received in the SCAB. The remaining one-quarter is absorbed by clouds. The ultraviolet portion of this abundant radiation is a key factor in photochemical reactions. On the shortest day of the year, there are approximately 10 hours of possible sunshine, and on the longest day of the year, there are approximately 14½ hours of possible sunshine.

The importance of wind to air pollution is considerable. The direction and speed of the wind determines the horizontal dispersion and transport of the air pollutants. During the late autumn to early spring rainy season, the SCAB is subjected to wind flows associated with the traveling storms moving through the region from the northwest. This period also brings five to ten periods of strong, dry offshore winds, locally termed “Santa Anas” each year. During the dry season, which coincides with the months of maximum photochemical smog concentrations, the wind flow is bimodal, typified by a daytime onshore sea breeze and a nighttime offshore drainage wind. Summer wind flows are created by the pressure differences between the relatively cold ocean and the unevenly heated and cooled land surfaces that modify the general northwesterly wind circulation over southern California. Nighttime drainage begins with the radiational cooling of the mountain slopes. Heavy, cool air descends the slopes and flows through the mountain passes and canyons as it follows the lowering terrain toward the ocean. Another characteristic wind regime in the SCAB is the “Catalina Eddy,” a low level cyclonic (counterclockwise) flow centered over Santa Catalina Island which results in an offshore flow to the southwest. On most spring and summer days, some indication of an eddy is apparent in coastal sections.

In the SCAB, there are two distinct temperature inversion structures that control vertical mixing of air pollution. During the summer, warm high-pressure descending (subsiding) air is undercut by a shallow layer of cool marine air. The boundary between these two layers of air is a persistent marine subsidence/inversion. This boundary prevents vertical mixing which effectively acts as an impervious lid to pollutants over the entire SCAB. The mixing height for the inversion structure is normally situated 1,000 to 1,500 feet above mean sea level.

A second inversion-type forms in conjunction with the drainage of cool air off the surrounding mountains at night followed by the seaward drift of this pool of cool air. The top of this layer forms a sharp boundary with the warmer air aloft and creates nocturnal radiation inversions.

These inversions occur primarily in the winter, when nights are longer and onshore flow is weakest. They are typically only a few hundred feet above mean sea level. These inversions effectively trap pollutants, such as nitrogen oxides (NOX) and carbon monoxide (CO) from vehicles, as the pool of cool air drifts seaward. Winter is therefore a period of high levels of primary pollutants along the coastline.

2.3 WIND PATTERNS AND PROJECT LOCATION
The distinctive climate of the Project area and the SCAB is determined by its terrain and geographical location. The SCAB is located in a coastal plain with connecting broad valleys and low hills, bounded by the Pacific Ocean in the southwest quadrant with high mountains forming the remainder of the perimeter.
3452
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
18 Wind patterns across the south coastal region are characterized by westerly and southwesterly onshore winds during the day and easterly or northeasterly breezes at night. Winds are characteristically light although the speed is somewhat greater during the dry summer months than during the rainy winter season.

2.4 CRITERIA POLLUTANTS
Criteria pollutants are pollutants that are regulated through the development of human health based and/or environmentally based criteria for setting permissible levels. Criteria pollutants, their typical sources, and health effects are identified below (6):

TABLE 2-1: CRITERIA POLLUTANTS
Criteria Pollutant Description Sources Health Effects
CO CO is a colorless, odorless gas
produced by the incomplete
combustion of carbon-containing
fuels, such as gasoline or wood.

CO concentrations tend to be the
highest during the winter
morning, when little to no wind
and surface-based inversions trap
the pollutant at ground levels.

Because CO is emitted directly
from internal combustion
engines, unlike ozone (O3), motor
vehicles operating at slow speeds
are the primary source of CO in
the SCAB. The highest ambient
CO concentrations are generally
found near congested
transportation corridors and
intersections.

Any source that
burns fuel such as
automobiles, trucks,
heavy construction
equipment, farming
equipment and
residential heating.

Individuals with a deficient
blood supply to the heart are
the most susceptible to the
adverse effects of CO
exposure. The effects
observed include earlier
onset of chest pain with
exercise, and
electrocardiograph changes
indicative of decreased
oxygen (O2) supply to the
heart. Inhaled CO has no
direct toxic effect on the
lungs but exerts its effect on
tissues by interfering with O2
transport and competing with
O2 to combine with
hemoglobin present in the
blood to form
carboxyhemoglobin (COHb).

Hence, conditions with an
increased demand for O2
supply can be adversely
affected by exposure to CO.

Individuals most at risk
include fetuses, patients with
diseases involving heart and
blood vessels, and patients
with chronic hypoxemia (O2
deficiency) as seen at high
altitudes.

SO2 SO2 is a colorless, extremely
irritating gas or liquid. It enters
the atmosphere as a pollutant
Coal or oil burning
power plants and
industries,
A few minutes of exposure to
low levels of SO2 can result in
airway constriction in some
3453
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
19 Criteria Pollutant Description Sources Health Effects mainly as a result of burning high
sulfur-content fuel oils and coal
and from chemical processes
occurring at chemical plants and
refineries. When SO2 oxidizes in
the atmosphere, it forms SO4.

Collectively, these pollutants are
referred to as sulfur oxides (SOX).
refineries, diesel
engines
asthmatics, all of whom are
sensitive to its effects. In
asthmatics, increase in
resistance to air flow, as well
as reduction in breathing
capacity leading to severe
breathing difficulties, are
observed after acute
exposure to SO2. In contrast,
healthy individuals do not
exhibit similar acute
responses even after
exposure to higher
concentrations of SO2.

Animal studies suggest that
despite SO2 being a
respiratory irritant, it does
not cause substantial lung
injury at ambient
concentrations. However,
very high levels of exposure
can cause lung edema (fluid
accumulation), lung tissue
damage, and sloughing off of
cells lining the respiratory
tract.

Some population-based
studies indicate that the
mortality and morbidity
effects associated with fine
particles show a similar
association with ambient SO2
levels. In these studies,
efforts to separate the effects
of SO2 from those of fine
particles have not been
successful. It is not clear
whether the two pollutants
act synergistically, or one
pollutant alone is the
predominant factor.

NOX NOX consist of nitric oxide (NO),
nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and
nitrous oxide (N2O) and are
formed when nitrogen (N2)
combines with O2. Their lifespan
in the atmosphere ranges from
Any source that
burns fuel such as
automobiles, trucks,
heavy construction
equipment, farming
Population-based studies
suggest that an increase in
acute respiratory illness,
including infections and
respiratory symptoms in
children (not infants), is
3454
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
20 Criteria Pollutant Description Sources Health Effects one to seven days for nitric oxide
and nitrogen dioxide, to 170
years for nitrous oxide. NOX is
typically created during
combustion processes and are
major contributors to smog
formation and acid deposition.

NO2 is a criteria air pollutant and
may result in numerous adverse
health effects; it absorbs blue
light, resulting in a brownish-red
cast to the atmosphere and
reduced visibility. Of the seven
types of nitrogen oxide
compounds, NO2 is the most
abundant in the atmosphere. As
ambient concentrations of NO2
are related to traffic density,
commuters in heavy traffic may
be exposed to higher
concentrations of NO2 than those
indicated by regional monitoring
station.
equipment and
residential heating.
associated with long-term
exposure to NO2 at levels
found in homes with gas
stoves, which are higher than
ambient levels found in
Southern California. Increase
in resistance to air flow and
airway contraction is
observed after short-term
exposure to NO2 in healthy
subjects. Larger decreases in
lung functions are observed
in individuals with asthma or
chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease (e.g.,
chronic bronchitis,
emphysema) than in healthy
individuals, indicating a
greater susceptibility of these
sub-groups.

In animals, exposure to levels
of NO2 considerably higher
than ambient concentrations
result in increased
susceptibility to infections,
possibly due to the observed
changes in cells involved in
maintaining immune
functions. The severity of
lung tissue damage
associated with high levels of
O3 exposure increases when
animals are exposed to a
combination of O3 and NO2.

O3 O3 is a highly reactive and
unstable gas that is formed when
VOCs and NOX, both byproducts
of internal combustion engine
exhaust, undergo slow
photochemical reactions in the
presence of sunlight. O3
concentrations are generally
highest during the summer
months when direct sunlight,
light wind, and warm
temperature conditions are
favorable to the formation of this
pollutant.

Formed when
reactive organic
gases (ROG)
and NOX
react in the
presence of
sunlight. ROG
sources
include any source
that burns fuels,
(e.g., gasoline,
natural gas, wood,
oil) solvents,
petroleum
processing and
Individuals exercising
outdoors, children, and
people with preexisting lung
disease, such as asthma and
chronic pulmonary lung
disease, are considered to be
the most susceptible subgroups for O3 effects. Shortterm exposure (lasting for a few hours) to O3 at levels
typically observed in
Southern California can result
in breathing pattern changes,
reduction of breathing
capacity, increased
3455
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
21 Criteria Pollutant Description Sources Health Effects storage and
pesticides.
susceptibility to infections,
inflammation of the lung
tissue, and some
immunological changes.

Elevated O3 levels are
associated with increased
school absences. In recent
years, a correlation between
elevated ambient O3 levels
and increases in daily hospital
admission rates, as well as
mortality, has also been
reported. An increased risk
for asthma has been found in
children who participate in
multiple outdoor sports and
live in communities with high
O3 levels.

O3 exposure under exercising
conditions is known to
increase the severity of the
responses described above.

Animal studies suggest that
exposure to a combination of
pollutants that includes O3
may be more toxic than
exposure to O3 alone.

Although lung volume and
resistance changes observed
after a single exposure
diminish with repeated
exposures, biochemical and
cellular changes appear to
persist, which can lead to
subsequent lung structural
changes.

Particulate Matter PM10: A major air pollutant
consisting of tiny solid or liquid
particles of soot, dust, smoke,
fumes, and aerosols. Particulate
matter pollution is a major cause
of reduce visibility (haze) which is
caused by the scattering of light
and consequently the significant
reduction air clarity. The size of
the particles (10 microns or
smaller, about 0.0004 inches or
less) allows them to easily enter
the lungs where they may be
Sources of PM10
include road dust,
windblown dust and
construction. Also
formed from other
pollutants (acid
rain, NOX, SOX,
organics).

Incomplete
combustion of any
fuel.

PM2.5 comes from
A consistent correlation
between elevated ambient
fine particulate matter (PM10
and PM2.5) levels and an
increase in mortality rates,
respiratory infections,
number and severity of
asthma attacks and the
number of hospital
admissions has been
observed in different parts of
the United States and various
areas around the world. In
3456
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
22 Criteria Pollutant Description Sources Health Effects deposited, resulting in adverse
health effects. Additionally, it
should be noted that PM10 is
considered a criteria air
pollutant.

PM2.5: A similar air pollutant to
PM10 consisting of tiny solid or
liquid particles which are 2.5
microns or smaller (which is often
referred to as fine particles).

These particles are formed in the
atmosphere from primary
gaseous emissions that include
SO4 formed from SO2 release
from power plants and industrial
facilities and nitrates that are
formed from NOX release from
power plants, automobiles, and
other types of combustion
sources. The chemical
composition of fine particles
highly depends on location, time
of year, and weather conditions.

PM2.5 is a criteria air pollutant.
fuel combustion in
motor vehicles,
equipment, and
industrial sources,
residential and
agricultural
burning. Also
formed from
reaction of other
pollutants (acid
rain, NOX, SOX,
organics).
recent years, some studies
have reported an association
between long-term exposure
to air pollution dominated by
fine particles and increased
mortality, reduction in
lifespan, and an increased
mortality from lung cancer.

Daily fluctuations in PM2.5
concentration levels have
also been related to hospital
admissions for acute
respiratory conditions in
children, to school and
kindergarten absences, to a
decrease in respiratory lung
volumes in normal children,
and to increased medication
use in children and adults
with asthma. Recent studies
show lung function growth in
children is reduced with long
term exposure to particulate
matter.

The elderly, people with preexisting respiratory or
cardiovascular disease, and
children appear to be more
susceptible to the effects of
high levels of PM10 and PM2.5.

VOC VOCs are hydrocarbon
compounds (any compound
containing various combinations
of hydrogen and carbon atoms)
that exist in the ambient air.

VOCs contribute to the formation
of smog through atmospheric
photochemical reactions and/or
may be toxic. Compounds of
carbon (also known as organic
compounds) have different levels
of reactivity; that is, they do not
react at the same speed or do not
form O3 to the same extent when
exposed to photochemical
processes. VOCs often have an
odor, and some examples include
gasoline, alcohol, and the
Organic chemicals
are widely used as
ingredients in
household
products. Paints,
varnishes, and wax
all contain organic
solvents, as do
many cleaning,
disinfecting,
cosmetic,
degreasing and
hobby products.

Fuels are made up
of organic
chemicals. All of
these products can
release organic
Breathing VOCs can irritate
the eyes, nose, and throat,
can cause difficulty breathing
and nausea, and can damage
the central nervous system as
well as other organs. Some
VOCs can cause cancer. Not
all VOCs have all these health
effects, though many have
several.
3457
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
23 Criteria Pollutant Description Sources Health Effects solvents used in paints.

Exceptions to the VOC
designation include CO, carbon
dioxide, carbonic acid, metallic
carbides or carbonates, and
ammonium carbonate. VOCs are
a criteria pollutant since they are
a precursor to O3, which is a
criteria pollutant. The terms VOC
and ROG (see below)
interchangeably.
compounds while
you are using them,
and, to some
degree, when they
are stored.

ROG Similar to VOC, ROGs are also
precursors in forming O3 and
consist of compounds containing
methane, ethane, propane,
butane, and longer chain
hydrocarbons, which are typically
the result of some type of
combustion/decomposition
process. Smog is formed when
ROG and NOX react in the
presence of sunlight. ROGs are a
criteria pollutant since they are a
precursor to O3, which is a
criteria pollutant. The terms ROG
and VOC (see previous)
interchangeably.

Sources similar to
VOCs.

Health effects similar to
VOCs.

Lead (Pb) Pb is a heavy metal that is highly
persistent in the environment
and is considered a criteria
pollutant. In the past, the primary
source of Pb in the air was
emissions from vehicles burning
leaded gasoline. The major
sources of Pb emissions are ore
and metals processing,
particularly Pb smelters, and
piston-engine aircraft operating
on leaded aviation gasoline.

Other stationary sources include
waste incinerators, utilities, and
lead-acid battery manufacturers.

It should be noted that the
Project does not include
operational activities such as
metal processing or Pb acid
battery manufacturing. As such,
the Project is not anticipated to
Metal smelters,
resource recovery,
leaded gasoline,
deterioration of Pb
paint.

Fetuses, infants, and children
are more sensitive than
others to the adverse effects
of Pb exposure. Exposure to
low levels of Pb can adversely
affect the development and
function of the central
nervous system, leading to
learning disorders,
distractibility, inability to
follow simple commands, and
lower intelligence quotient. In
adults, increased Pb levels are
associated with increased
blood pressure.

Pb poisoning can cause
anemia, lethargy, seizures,
and death; although it
appears that there are no
direct effects of Pb on the
respiratory system. Pb can be
3458
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
24 Criteria Pollutant Description Sources Health Effects generate a quantifiable amount
of Pb emissions.
stored in the bone from early
age environmental exposure,
and elevated blood Pb levels
can occur due to breakdown
of bone tissue during
pregnancy, hyperthyroidism
(increased secretion of
hormones from the thyroid
gland) and osteoporosis
(breakdown of bony tissue).

Fetuses and breast-fed babies
can be exposed to higher
levels of Pb because of
previous environmental Pb
exposure of their mothers.

Odor Odor means the perception
experienced by a person when
one or more chemical substances
in the air come into contact with
the human olfactory nerves (7).

Odors can come
from many sources
including animals,
human activities,
industry, natures,
and vehicles.

Offensive odors can
potentially affect human
health in several ways. First,
odorant compounds can
irritate the eye, nose, and
throat, which can reduce
respiratory volume. Second,
studies have shown that the
VOCs that cause odors can
stimulate sensory nerves to
cause neurochemical changes
that might influence health,
for instance, by
compromising the immune
system. Finally, unpleasant
odors can trigger memories
or attitudes linked to
unpleasant odors, causing
cognitive and emotional
effects such as stress.
3459
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
25 2.5 EXISTING AIR QUALITY
Existing air quality is measured at established SCAQMD air quality monitoring stations. Monitored air quality is evaluated in the context of ambient air quality standards. These standards are the levels of air quality that are considered safe, with an adequate margin of safety, to protect the public health and welfare. National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) currently in effect are shown in Table 2-2 (8).

The determination of whether a region’s air quality is healthful or unhealthful is determined by comparing contaminant levels in ambient air samples to the state and federal standards. At the time of this AQIA, the most recent state and federal standards were updated by CARB on May ,4 2016 and are presented in Table 2-2. The air quality in a region is considered to be in attainment by the state if the measured ambient air pollutant levels for O3, CO (except 8-hour Lake Tahoe), SO2 (1 and 24 hour), NO2, PM10, and PM2.5 are not to be exceeded. All others are not to be equaled or exceeded. It should be noted that the three-year period is presented for informational purposes and is not the basis for how the State assigns attainment status. Attainment status for a pollutant means that the SCAQMD meets the standards set by the EPA or the California EPA (CalEPA). Conversely, nonattainment means that an area has monitored air quality that does not meet the NAAQS or CAAQS standards. In order to improve air quality in nonattainment areas, a State Implementation Plan (SIP) is drafted by CARB. The SIP outlines the measures that the state will take to improve air quality. Once nonattainment areas meet the standards and additional redesignation requirements, the EPA will designate the area as a maintenance area (9). 3460
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
26 TABLE 2-2: AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS (1 OF 2)
3461
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
27 TABLE 2-2: AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS (2 OF 2)
3462
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
28 2.6 REGIONAL AIR QUALITY
Air pollution contributes to a wide variety of adverse health effects. The EPA has established NAAQS for six of the most common air pollutants: CO, Pb, O3, particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5), NO2, and SO2 which are known as criteria pollutants. The SCAQMD monitors levels of various criteria pollutants at 37 permanent monitoring stations and 5 single-pollutant source Pb air monitoring sites throughout the air district (10). On January 5, 2021, CARB posted the 2020 amendments to the state and national area designations. See Table 2-3 for attainment designations for the SCAB (11). Appendix 2.1 provides geographic representation of the state and federal attainment status for applicable criteria pollutants within the SCAB.

TABLE 2-3: ATTAINMENT STATUS OF CRITERIA POLLUTANTS IN THE SCAB Criteria Pollutant State Designation Federal Designation O3 – 1-hour standard Nonattainment --
O3 – 8-hour standard Nonattainment Nonattainment
PM10 Nonattainment Attainment
PM2.5 Nonattainment Nonattainment
CO Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment
NO2 Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment
SO2 Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment
Pb2 Attainment Unclassifiable/Attainment
Note: See Appendix 2.1 for a detailed map of State/National Area Designations within the SCAB “-“ = The national 1-hour O3 standard was revoked effective June 15, 2005.

2.7 LOCAL AIR QUALITY
The SCAQMD has designated general forecast areas and air monitoring areas (referred to as Source Receptor Areas [SRA]) throughout the district in order to provide Southern California residents about the air quality conditions. The Project site is located within the Southwest San Bernardino Valley area (SRA 33). The CA-60 Near Road monitoring station is located 2.52 miles northwest of the Project site and is the nearest long-term air quality monitoring site for NO2 and PM2.5. The SCAQMD I-10 Near Road monitoring station is located 4.24 miles northeast of the Project site and is the next nearest monitoring site within SRA 33. The I-10 Near Road monitoring station provides data for CO. Relative to the Project site, the nearest long-term air quality monitoring site for O3 and PM10 is the SCAQMD Northwest San Bernardino Valley (SRA 32) monitoring station located 7.17 miles northwest of the Project site. It should be noted that the Northwest San Bernardino Valley monitoring station was utilized in lieu of the CA-60 Near Road and I-10 Near Road monitoring stations only in instances where data was not available.

The most recent three (3) years of data available are shown on Table 2-4 and identifies the number of days ambient air quality standards were exceeded for the study area, which is 2 The Federal nonattainment designation for lead is only applicable towards the Los Angeles County portion of the SCAB. 3463
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
29 considered to be representative of the local air quality at the Project Site. Data for O3, CO, NO2, PM10, and PM2.5 for 2018 through 2020 was obtained from the SCAQMD Air Quality Data Tables (12). Additionally, data for SO2 has been omitted as attainment is regularly met in the SCAB and few monitoring stations measure SO2 concentrations.

TABLE 2-4: PROJECT AREA AIR QUALITY MONITORING SUMMARY 2018-2020 Pollutant Standard
Year
2018 2019 2020
O3
Maximum Federal 1-Hour Concentration (ppm) 0.133 0.131 0.158 Maximum Federal 8-Hour Concentration (ppm) 0.111 0.107 0.123 Number of Days Exceeding State 1-Hour Standard > 0.09 ppm 25 31 82 Number of Days Exceeding State/Federal 8-Hour Standard > 0.070 ppm 52 52 114 CO
Maximum Federal 1-Hour Concentration > 35 ppm 1.6 1.5 1.5 Maximum Federal 8-Hour Concentration > 20 ppm 1.3 1.1 1.2 NO2
Maximum Federal 1-Hour Concentration > 0.100 ppm 0.079 0.087 0.101 Annual Average 0.030 0.029 0.029
PM10
Maximum Federal 24-Hour Concentration (µg/m3) > 150 µg/m3 73 125 63 Annual Federal Arithmetic Mean (µg/m3) 32.3 28.1 30.5
Number of Days Exceeding Federal 24-Hour Standard > 150 µg/m3 0 0 0 Number of Days Exceeding State 24-Hour Standard > 50 µg/m3 14 7 12 PM2.5
Maximum Federal 24-Hour Concentration (µg/m3) > 35 µg/m3 47.90 41.30 53.10 Annual Federal Arithmetic Mean (µg/m3) > 12 µg/m3 14.31 12.70 14.36 Number of Days Exceeding Federal 24-Hour Standard > 35 µg/m3 5 5 4 ppm = Parts Per Million
µg/m3 = Microgram per Cubic Meter
Source: Data for O3, CO, NO2, PM10, and PM2.5 was obtained from SCAQMD Air Quality Data Tables.

2.8 REGIONAL AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT
The Project is within the jurisdiction of the SCAQMD. In 1976, California adopted the Lewis Air Quality Management Act which created SCAQMD from a voluntary association of air pollution control districts in Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino counties. The geographic area of which SCAQMD consists of is known as the SCAB. SCAQMD develops comprehensive plans 3464
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
30 and regulatory programs for the region to attain federal standards by dates specified in federal law. The agency is also responsible for meeting state standards by the earliest date achievable, using reasonably available control measures.

SCAQMD rule development through the 1970s and 1980s resulted in dramatic improvement in SCAB air quality. Nearly all control programs developed through the early 1990s relied on (i) the development and application of cleaner technology; (ii) add-on emission controls, and (iii) uniform CEQA review throughout the SCAB. Industrial emission sources have been significantly reduced by this approach and vehicular emissions have been reduced by technologies implemented at the state level by CARB.

As discussed above, the SCAQMD is the lead agency charged with regulating air quality emission reductions for the entire SCAB. SCAQMD created AQMPs which represent a regional blueprint for achieving healthful air on behalf of the 16 million residents of the SCAB. The 2012 AQMP states, “the remarkable historical improvement in air quality since the 1970’s is the direct result of Southern California’s comprehensive, multiyear strategy of reducing air pollution from all sources as outlined in its AQMPs,” (13).

Emissions of O3, NOX, VOC, and CO have been decreasing in the SCAB since 1975 and are projected to continue to decrease through 2020 (14). These decreases result primarily from motor vehicle controls and reductions in evaporative emissions. Although vehicle miles traveled (VMT) in the SCAB continue to increase, NOX and VOC levels are decreasing because of the mandated controls on motor vehicles and the replacement of older polluting vehicles with loweremitting vehicles. NOX emissions from electric utilities have also decreased due to use of cleaner fuels and renewable energy. O3 contour maps show that the number of days exceeding the 8- hour NAAQS has generally decreased between 1980 and 2020. For 2020, there was an overall decrease in exceedance days compared with the 1980 period. However, as shown on Table 2-5, O3 levels have increased in the past three years due to higher temperatures and stagnant weather conditions. Notwithstanding, O3 levels in the SCAB have decreased substantially over the last 30 years with the current maximum measured concentrations being approximately one-third of concentrations within the late 70’s (15).
3465
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
31 TABLE 2-5: SCAB O3 TREND
Source: 2020 SCAQMD, Historical O3 Air Quality Trends (1976-2020) The overall trends of PM10 and PM2.5 levels in the air (not emissions) show an overall improvement since 1975. Direct emissions of PM10 have remained somewhat constant in the SCAB and direct emissions of PM2.5 have decreased slightly since 1975. Area wide sources (fugitive dust from roads, dust from construction, and other sources) contribute the greatest amount of direct particulate matter emissions.

As with other pollutants, the most recent PM10 statistics show an overall improvement as illustrated in Tables 2-6 and 2-7. During the period for which data are available, the 24-hour national annual average concentration for PM10 decreased by approximately 46%, from 103.7 microgram per cubic meter (µg/m³) in 1988 to 55.5 µg/m³ in 2020 (16). Although the values are below the federal standard, it should be noted that there are days within the year where the concentrations would exceed the threshold. The 24-hour state annual average for emissions for PM10, have decreased by approximately 64%, from 93.9 µg/m³ in 1989 to 33.9 µg/m³ in 2020 (16). Although data in the late 1990’s show some variability, this is probably due to the advances in meteorological science rather than a change in emissions. Similar to the ambient concentrations, the calculated number of days above the 24-hour PM10 standards has also shown an overall drop.
0 25
50 75
100
125
150
175
200
225
250
Basin Days Exceeding
YEAR
1-Hour Stage 1 Episode
1-Hour Health Advisory
1979 1-Hour NAAQS
1997 8-Hour NAAQS
2008 8-Hour NAAQS
2015 8-Hour NAAQS
3466
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
32 TABLE 2-6: SCAB AVERAGE 24-HOUR CONCENTRATION PM10 TREND (BASED ON FEDERAL STANDARD)1 Source: 2020 CARB, iADAM: Top Four Summary: PM10 24-Hour Averages (1988-2020) 1 Some years have been omitted from the table as insufficient data (or no) data has been reported. Years with reported value of “0” have also been omitted.
3467
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
33 TABLE 2-7: SCAB ANNUAL AVERAGE CONCENTRATION PM10 TREND (BASED ON STATE STANDARD)1 Source: 2020 CARB, iADAM: Top Four Summary: PM10 24-Hour Averages (1988-2020) 1 Some years have been omitted from the table as insufficient data (or no) data has been reported. Years with reported value of “0” have also been omitted.

Tables 2-8 and 2-9 shows the most recent 24-hour average PM2.5 concentrations in the SCAB from 1999 through 2020. Overall, the national and state annual average concentrations have decreased by almost 50% and 31% respectively (16). It should be noted that the SCAB is currently designated as nonattainment for the state and federal PM2.5 standards.

TABLE 2-8: SCAB 24-HOUR AVERAGE CONCENTRATION PM2.5 TREND (BASED ON FEDERAL STANDARD)1 Source: 2020 CARB, iADAM: Top Four Summary: PM2.5 24-Hour Averages (1999-2020) 1 Some years have been omitted from the table as insufficient data (or no) data has been reported. Years with reported value of “0” have also been omitted.
3468
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
34 TABLE 2-9: SCAB ANNUAL AVERAGE CONCENTRATION PM2.5 TREND (BASED ON STATE STANDARD)1 Source: 2020 CARB, iADAM: Top Four Summary: PM2.5 24-Hour Averages (1999-2020) 1 Some years have been omitted from the table as insufficient data (or no) data has been reported. Years with reported value of “0” have also been omitted.

While the 2012 AQMP PM10 attainment demonstration and the 2015 associated supplemental SIP submission indicated that attainment of the 24-hour standard was predicted to occur by the end of 2015, it could not anticipate the effect of the ongoing drought on the measured PM2.5.

The 2006 to 2010 base period used for the 2012 attainment demonstration had near-normal rainfall. While the trend of PM2.5-equivalent emission reductions continued through 2015, the severe drought conditions contributed to the PM2.5 increases observed after 2012. As a result of the disrupted progress toward attainment of the federal 24-hour PM2.5 standard, SCAQMD submitted a request and the EPA approved, in January 2016, a “bump up” to the nonattainment classification from “moderate” to “serious,” with a new attainment deadline as soon as practicable, but not beyond December 31, 2019. As of March 14, 2019, the EPA approved portions of a SIP revision submitted by California to address CAA requirements for the 2006 24- hour PM2.5 NAAQS in the Los Angeles-SCAB Serious PM2.5 nonattainment area. The EPA also approved 2017 and 2019 motor vehicle emissions budgets for transportation conformity purposes and inter-pollutant trading ratios for use in transportation conformity analyses (17).

In March 2017, the SCAQMD released the Final 2016 AQMP. The 2016 AQMP continues to evaluate current integrated strategies and control measures to meet the NAAQS, as well as explore new and innovative methods to reach its goals. Some of these approaches include utilizing incentive programs, recognizing existing co-benefit programs from other sectors, and developing a strategy with fair-share reductions at the federal, state, and local levels (18). Similar to the 2012 AQMP, the 2016 AQMP incorporates scientific and technological information and planning assumptions, including the 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (2016-2040 RTP/SCS) and updated emission inventory methodologies for various source categories (19).
3469
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
35 The 2022 AQMP is currently being developed by SCAQMD to address the EPA’s strengthened ozone standard. Development of the 2022 AQMP is in its early stages and no formal timeline for completion and adoption is currently known.

The most recent CO concentrations in the SCAB are shown in Table 2-10 (16). CO concentrations in the SCAB have decreased markedly — a total decrease of more about 80% in the peak 8-hour concentration from 1986 to 2012. It should be noted 2012 is the most recent year where 8-hour CO averages and related statistics are available in the SCAB. The number of exceedance days has also declined. The entire SCAB is now designated as attainment for both the state and national CO standards. Ongoing reductions from motor vehicle control programs should continue the downward trend in ambient CO concentrations.

TABLE 2-10: SCAB 8-HOUR AVERAGE CONCENTRATION CO TREND1 Source: 2020 CARB, iADAM: Top Four Summary: CO 8-Hour Averages (1986-2012) 1 The most recent year where 8-hour concentration data is available is 2012.

Part of the control process of the SCAQMD’s duty to greatly improve the air quality in the SCAB is the uniform CEQA review procedures required by SCAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook (1993) (1993 CEQA Handbook) (20). The single threshold of significance used to assess Project direct and cumulative impacts has in fact “worked” as evidenced by the track record of the air quality in the SCAB dramatically improving over the course of the past decades. As stated by the SCAQMD, the District’s thresholds of significance are based on factual and scientific data and are therefore appropriate thresholds of significance to use for this Project.

The most recent NO2 data for the SCAB is shown in Tables 2-11 and 2-12 (16). Over the last 50 years, NO2 values have decreased significantly; the peak 1-hour national and state averages for 2020 is approximately 80% lower than what it was during 1963. The SCAB attained the State 1- hour NO2 standard in 1994, bringing the entire state into attainment. A new state annual average

0.00 5.00

10.00 15.00

20.00 25.00

30.00 CO (ppm)
Year
Maximum 8-hour CO Averages
3470
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
36 standard of 0.030 ppm was adopted by CARB in February 2007 (21). The new standard is just barely exceeded in the SCAQMD. NO2 is formed from NOX emissions, which also contribute to O3.

As a result, the majority of the future emission control measures would be implemented as part of the overall O3 control strategy. Many of these control measures would target mobile sources, which account for more than three-quarters of California’s NOX emissions. These measures are expected to bring the SCAQMD into attainment of the state annual average standard.

TABLE 2-11: SCAB 1-HOUR AVERAGE CONCENTRATION NO2 TREND (BASED ON FEDERAL STANDARD) Source: 2020 CARB, iADAM: Top Four Summary: CO 1-Hour Averages (1963-2020) TABLE 2-12: SCAB 1-HOUR AVERAGE CONCENTRATION NO2 TREND (BASED ON STATE STANDARD) Source: 2020 CARB, iADAM: Top Four Summary: CO 1-Hour Averages (1963-2020) 3471
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
37 2.9.1 TOXIC AIR CONTAMINANTS (TAC) TRENDS
In 1984, as a result of public concern for exposure to airborne carcinogens, CARB adopted regulations to reduce the amount of TAC emissions resulting from mobile and area sources, such as cars, trucks, stationary sources, and consumer products. According to the Ambient and Emission Trends of Toxic Air Contaminants in California journal article (22) which was prepared for CARB, results show that between 1990-2012, ambient concentration and emission trends for the seven TACs responsible for most of the known cancer risk associated with airborne exposure in California have declined significantly (between 1990 and 2012). The seven TACs studied include those that are derived from mobile sources: diesel particulate matter (DPM), benzene (C6H6), and 1,3-butadiene (C4H6); those that are derived from stationary sources: perchloroethylene (C2Cl4) and hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)); and those derived from photochemical reactions of emitted VOCs: formaldehyde (CH2O) and acetaldehyde (C2H4O)3. The decline in ambient concentration and emission trends of these TACs are a result of various regulations CARB has implemented to address cancer risk.

MOBILE SOURCE TACS
CARB introduced two programs that aimed at reducing mobile emissions for light and medium duty vehicles through vehicle emissions controls and cleaner fuel. In California, light-duty vehicles sold after 1996 are equipped with California’s second-generation On-Board Diagnostic (OBD-II) system. The OBD-II system monitors virtually every component that can affect the emission performance of the vehicle to ensure that the vehicle remains as clean as possible over its entire life and assists repair technicians in diagnosing and fixing problems with the computerized engine controls. If a problem is detected, the OBD-II system illuminates a warning lamp on the vehicle instrument panel to alert the driver. This warning lamp typically contains the phrase “Check Engine” or “Service Engine Soon.” The system would also store important information about the detected malfunction so that a repair technician can accurately find and fix the problem. CARB has recently developed similar OBD requirements for heavy-duty vehicles over 14,000 pounds (lbs). CARB’s phase II Reformulated Gasoline Regulation (RFG-2), adopted in 1996, also led to a reduction of mobile source emissions. Through such regulations, benzene levels declined 88% from 1990-2012. 1,3-Butadiene concentrations also declined 85% from 1990-2012 as a result of the use of reformulated gasoline and motor vehicle regulations (22).

In 2000, CARB’s Diesel Risk Reduction Plan (DRRP) recommended the replacement and retrofit of diesel-fueled engines and the use of ultra-low-sulfur (<15 ppm) diesel fuel. As a result of these measures, DPM concentrations have declined 68% since 2000, even though the state’s population increased 31% and the amount of diesel vehicles miles traveled increased 81%, as shown on Exhibit 2-B. With the implementation of these diesel-related control regulations, CARB expects a DPM decline of 71% for 2000-2020.
3 It should be noted that ambient DPM concentrations are not measured directly. Rather, a surrogate method using the coefficient of haze (COH) and elemental carbon (EC) is used to estimate DPM concentrations. 3472
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
38 EXHIBIT 2-A: DPM AND DIESEL VEHICLE MILES TREND
Source: 2020 CARB

DIESEL REGULATIONS
CARB and the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach (POLA and POLB) have adopted several iterations of regulations for diesel trucks that are aimed at reducing DPM. More specifically, CARB Drayage Truck Regulation (23), CARB statewide On-road Truck and Bus Regulation (24), and the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach Clean Truck Program (CTP) require accelerated implementation of “clean trucks” into the statewide truck fleet (25). In other words, older more polluting trucks would be replaced with newer, cleaner trucks as a function of these regulatory requirements.

Moreover, the average statewide DPM emissions for Heavy Duty Trucks (HDT), in terms of grams of DPM generated per mile traveled, would dramatically be reduced due to the aforementioned regulatory requirements.

Diesel emissions identified in this analysis would therefore overstate future DPM emissions since not all the regulatory requirements are reflected in the modeling.

CANCER RISK TRENDS
Based on information available from CARB, overall cancer risk throughout the SCAB has had a declining trend since 1990. In 1998, following an exhaustive 10-year scientific assessment process, CARB identified particulate matter from diesel-fueled engines as a toxic air contaminant.

The SCAQMD initiated a comprehensive urban toxic air pollution study called the Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study (MATES). DPM accounts for more than 70% of the cancer risk. 3473
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
39 In January 2018, as part of the overall effort to reduce air toxics exposure in the SCAB, SCAQMD began conducting the MATES V Program. MATES V field measurements were conducted at ten fixed sites (the same sites selected for MATES III and IV) to assess trends in air toxics levels.

MATES V also included measurements of ultrafine particles (UFP) and black carbon (BC) concentrations, which can be compared to the UFP levels measured in MATES IV (26). The final report for the MATES V study was published August 2021. In addition to new measurements and updated modeling results, several key updates were implemented in MATES V. First, MATES V estimates cancer risks by taking into account multiple exposure pathways, which includes inhalation and non-inhalation pathways. This approach is consistent with how cancer risks are estimated in South Coast AQMD’s programs such as permitting, Air Toxics Hot Spots (AB2588), and CEQA. Previous MATES studies quantified the cancer risks based on the inhalation pathway only. Second, along with cancer risk estimates, MATES V includes information on the chronic noncancer risks from inhalation and non-inhalation pathways for the first time. Cancer risks and chronic non-cancer risks from MATES II through IV measurements have been re-examined using current Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) and CalEPA risk assessment methodologies and modern statistical methods to examine the trends over time (27).

MATES-V calculated cancer risks based on monitoring data collected at ten fixed sites within the SCAB. None of the fixed monitoring sites are within the local area of the Project site. However, MATES-V has extrapolated the excess cancer risk levels throughout the SCAB by modeling the specific grids. The Project is located within a quadrant of the geographic grid of the MATES-V model which predicted a cancer risk of 600 in one million for the area containing the Project site.

DPM is included in this cancer risk along with all other TAC sources. As in previous MATES iterations, diesel PM is the largest contributor to overall air toxics cancer risk. However, the average levels of diesel PM in MATES V are 53% lower at the 10 monitoring sites compared to MATES IV. Cumulative Project generated TACs are limited to DPM. 3474
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
40 This page intentionally left blank
3475
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
41 3 REGULATORY BACKGROUND

3.1 FEDERAL REGULATIONS
The EPA is responsible for setting and enforcing the NAAQS for O3, CO, NOX, SO2, PM10, and Pb (28). The EPA has jurisdiction over emissions sources that are under the authority of the federal government including aircraft, locomotives, and emissions sources outside state waters (Outer Continental Shelf). The EPA also establishes emission standards for vehicles sold in states other than California. Automobiles sold in California must meet the stricter emission requirements of CARB.

The Federal Clean Air Act (CAA) was first enacted in 1955 and has been amended numerous times in subsequent years (1963, 1965, 1967, 1970, 1977, and 1990). The CAA establishes the federal air quality standards, the NAAQS, and specifies future dates for achieving compliance (29). The CAA also mandates that states submit and implement SIPs for local areas not meeting these standards. These plans must include pollution control measures that demonstrate how the standards will be met.

The 1990 amendments to the CAA that identify specific emission reduction goals for areas not meeting the NAAQS require a demonstration of reasonable further progress toward attainment and incorporate additional sanctions for failure to attain or to meet interim milestones. The sections of the CAA most directly applicable to the development of the Project site include Title I (Non-Attainment Provisions) and Title II (Mobile Source Provisions) (30) (31). Title I provisions were established with the goal of attaining the NAAQS for the following criteria pollutants O3, NO2, SO2, PM10, CO, PM2.5, and Pb. The NAAQS were amended in July 1997 to include an additional standard for O3 and to adopt a NAAQS for PM2.5. Table 2-3 (previously presented) provides the NAAQS within the SCAB.

Mobile source emissions are regulated in accordance with Title II provisions. These provisions require the use of cleaner burning gasoline and other cleaner burning fuels such as methanol and natural gas. Automobile manufacturers are also required to reduce tailpipe emissions of hydrocarbons and NOX. NOX is a collective term that includes all forms of NOX which are emitted as byproducts of the combustion process.

3.2 CALIFORNIA REGULATIONS
CARB
CARB, which became part of CalEPA in 1991, is responsible for ensuring implementation of the California Clean Air Act (AB 2595), responding to the federal CAA, and for regulating emissions from consumer products and motor vehicles. AB 2595 mandates achievement of the maximum degree of emissions reductions possible from vehicular and other mobile sources in order to attain the state ambient air quality standards by the earliest practical date. CARB established the CAAQS for all pollutants for which the federal government has NAAQS and, in addition, establishes standards for SO4, visibility, hydrogen sulfide (H2S), and vinyl chloride (C2H3Cl).

However, at this time, H2S and C2H3Cl are not measured at any monitoring stations in the SCAB 3476
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
42 because they are not considered to be a regional air quality problem. Generally, the CAAQS are more stringent than the NAAQS (32) (28).

Local air quality management districts, such as the SCAQMD, regulate air emissions from stationary sources such as commercial and industrial facilities. All air pollution control districts have been formally designated as attainment or non-attainment for each CAAQS.

Serious non-attainment areas are required to prepare Air Quality Management Plans (AQMP) that include specified emission reduction strategies in an effort to meet clean air goals. These plans are required to include:
• Application of Best Available Retrofit Control Technology to existing sources; • Developing control programs for area sources (e.g., architectural coatings and solvents) and indirect sources (e.g., motor vehicle use generated by residential and commercial development);
• A District permitting system designed to allow no net increase in emissions from any new or modified permitted sources of emissions;
• Implementing reasonably available transportation control measures and assuring a substantial reduction in growth rate of vehicle trips and miles traveled; • Significant use of low emissions vehicles by fleet operators; • Sufficient control strategies to achieve a 5% or more annual reduction in emissions or 15% or more in a period of three years for ROGs, NOX, CO and PM10. However, air basins may use alternative emission reduction strategy that achieves a reduction of less than 5% per year under certain circumstances.

TITLE 24 ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS AND CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24 Part 6: The California Energy Code was first adopted in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to reduce California’s energy consumption.

The standards are updated periodically to allow consideration and possible incorporation of new energy efficient technologies and methods. CCR, Title 24, Part 11: California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) is a comprehensive and uniform regulatory code for all residential, commercial, and school buildings that went in effect on January 1, 2009, and is administered by the California Building Standards Commission.

CALGreen is updated on a regular basis, with the most recent approved update consisting of the 2019 California Green Building Code Standards that became effective January 1, 2020.

Local jurisdictions are permitted to adopt more stringent requirements, as state law provides methods for local enhancements. CALGreen recognizes that many jurisdictions have developed existing construction waste and demolition ordinances and defers to them as the ruling guidance provided they establish a minimum 65% diversion requirement.

The code also provides exemptions for areas not served by construction waste and demolition recycling infrastructure. The State Building Code provides the minimum standard that buildings must meet in order to be certified for occupancy, which is generally enforced by the local building official.
3477
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
43 Energy efficient buildings require less electricity; therefore, increased energy efficiency reduces fossil fuel consumption and decreases greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The 2019 version of Title 24 was adopted by the California Energy Commission (CEC) and became effective on January 1, 2020.

The 2019 Title 24 standards will result in less energy use, thereby reducing air pollutant emissions associated with energy consumption in the SCAB and across the State of California. For example, the 2019 Title 24 standards will require solar photovoltaic systems for new homes, establish requirements for newly constructed healthcare facilities, encourage demand responsive technologies for residential buildings, and update indoor and outdoor lighting requirements for nonresidential buildings.

The CEC anticipates that single-family homes built with the 2019 standards will use approximately 7% less energy compared to the residential homes built under the 2016 standards. Additionally, after implementation of solar photovoltaic systems, homes built under the 2019 standards will use about 53% less energy than homes built under the 2016 standards.

Nonresidential buildings (such as the Project) will use approximately 30% less energy due to lighting upgrade requirements (33).

Because the Project will be constructed after January 1, 2020, the 2019 CALGreen standards are applicable to the Project and require, among other items (34):
• EV Charging (new one- and two-family dwellings and townhouses with attached private garages). For each dwelling unit, install a listed raceway to accommodate a dedicated 208/240- volt branch circuit. The raceway shall not be less than trade size 1 (nominal 1-inch inside diameter). The raceway shall originate at the main service or subpanel and shall terminate into a listed cabinet, box or other enclosure in close proximity to the proposed location of an EV charger. Raceways are required to be continuous at enclosed, inaccessible or concealed areas and spaces. The service panel and/or subpanel shall provide capacity to install a 40-ampere minimum dedicated branch circuit and space(s) reserved to permit installation of a branch circuit overcurrent protective device (4.106.4.1).
• Short-term bicycle parking. If the new project or an additional alteration is anticipated to generate visitor traffic, provide permanently anchored bicycle racks within 200 feet of the visitors’ entrance, readily visible to passers-by, for 5% of new visitor motorized vehicle parking spaces being added, with a minimum of one two-bike capacity rack (5.106.4.1.1). • Long-term bicycle parking. For new buildings with tenant spaces that have 10 or more tenantoccupants, provide secure bicycle parking for 5% of the tenant-occupant vehicular parking spaces with a minimum of one bicycle parking facility (5.106.4.1.2). • Designated parking for clean air vehicles. In new projects or additions to alterations that add 10 or more vehicular parking spaces, provide designated parking for any combination of lowemitting, fuel-efficient and carpool/van pool vehicles asshown in Table 5.106.5.2 (5.106.5.2). • Electric vehicle charging stations. New construction shall facilitate the future installation of electric vehicle supply equipment. The compliance requires empty raceways for future conduit and documentation that the electrical system has adequate capacity for the future load. The number of spaces to be provided for is contained in Table 5.106. 5.3.3 (5.106.5.3). 3478
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
44 • Outdoor light pollution reduction. Outdoor lighting systems shall be designed to meet the backlight, uplight and glare ratings per Table 5.106.8 (5.106.8) • Construction waste management. Recycle and/or salvage for reuse a minimum of 65% of the nonhazardous construction and demolition waste in accordance with Section 5.408.1.1,

5.405.1.2, or 5.408.1.3; or meet a local construction and demolition waste management ordinance, whichever is more stringent (5.408.1).
• Excavated soil and land clearing debris. 100% of trees, stumps, rocks and associated vegetation and soils resulting primarily from land clearing shall be reused or recycled. For a phased project, such material may be stockpiled on site until the storage site is developed (5.408.3).
• Recycling by Occupants. Provide readily accessible areas that serve the entire building and are identified for the depositing, storage and collection of non-hazardous materials for recycling, including (at a minimum) paper, corrugated cardboard, glass, plastics, organic waste, and metals or meet a lawfully enacted local recycling ordinance, if more restrictive (5.410.1). • Water conserving plumbing fixtures and fittings. Plumbing fixtures (water closets and urinals) and fittings (faucets and showerheads) shall comply with the following:
o Water Closets. The effective flush volume of all water closets shall not exceed 1.28 gallons per flush (5.303.3.1)
o Urinals. The effective flush volume of wall-mounted urinals shall not exceed 0.125 gallons per flush (5.303.3.2.1). The effective flush volume of floor-mounted or other urinals shall not exceed 0.5 gallons per flush (5.303.3.2.2). o Showerheads. Single showerheads shall have a minimum flow rate of not more than 1.8 gallons per minute and 80 psi (5.303.3.3.1). When a shower is served by more than one showerhead, the combine flow rate of all showerheads and/or other shower outlets controlled by a single valve shall not exceed 1.8 gallons per minute at 80 psi (5.303.3.3.2). o Faucets and fountains. Nonresidential lavatory faucets shall have a maximum flow rate of not more than 0.5 gallons per minute at 60 psi (5.303.3.4.1). Kitchen faucets shall have a maximum flow rate of not more than 1.8 gallons per minute of 60 psi (5.303.3.4.2).

Wash fountains shall have a maximum flow rate of not more than 1.8 gallons per minute (5.303.3.4.3). Metering faucets shall not deliver more than 0.20 gallons per cycle (5.303.3.4.4). Metering faucets for wash fountains shall have a maximum flow rate not more than 0.20 gallons per cycle (5.303.3.4.5).
• Outdoor potable water use in landscaped areas. Nonresidential developments shall comply with a local water efficient landscape ordinance or the current California Department of Water Resources’ Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO), whichever is more stringent (5.304.1).
• Water meters. Separate submeters or metering devices shall be installed for new buildings or additions in excess of 50,000 sf or for excess consumption where any tenant within a new building or within an addition that is project to consume more than 1,000 gallons per day (5.303.1.1 and 5.303.1.2).
• Outdoor water use in rehabilitated landscape projects equal or greater than 2,500 sf.

Rehabilitated landscape projects with an aggregate landscape area equal to or greater than 2,500 sf requiring a building or landscape permit (5.304.3). 3479
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
45 • Commissioning. For new buildings 10,000 sf and over, building commissioning shall be included in the design and construction processes of the building project to verify that the building systems and components meet the owner’s or owner representative’s project requirements (5.410.2).

Additionally, under California’s 2022 Title 24, Part 6 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, solar photovoltaic systems are required for newly constructed low-rise residential buildings and shall be sized sufficient to offset the electricity use of the proposed building as if it was a mixed-fuel building.

AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLANNING (AQMP)
Currently, the NAAQS and CAAQS are exceeded in most parts of the SCAB. In response, the SCAQMD has adopted a series of AQMPs to meet the state and federal ambient air quality standards (19). AQMPs are updated regularly in order to more effectively reduce emissions, accommodate growth, and to minimize any negative fiscal impacts of air pollution control on the economy. A detailed discussion on the AQMP and Project consistency with the AQMP is provided in Section 5.8.
3480
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
46 This page intentionally left blank
3481
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
47 4 SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS
The criteria used to determine the significance of potential Project-related air quality impacts are taken from the Initial Study Checklist in Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines (14 CCR §§ 15000, et seq.). Based on these thresholds, a project would result in a potentially significant impact related to air quality if it would (1):
• Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan. • Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. • Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. • Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people.

4.1 REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS
The SCAQMD has also developed regional significance thresholds for other regulated pollutants, as summarized at Table 4-1 (35). The SCAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Significance Thresholds (April 2019) indicate that any projects in the SCAB with daily emissions that exceed any of the indicated thresholds should be considered as having an individually and cumulatively significant air quality impact.

TABLE 4-1: MAXIMUM DAILY REGIONAL EMISSIONS THRESHOLDS
Pollutant Construction Regional Thresholds Operational Regional Thresholds NOX 100 lbs/day 55 lbs/day
VOC 75 lbs/day 55 lbs/day
PM10 150 lbs/day 150 lbs/day
PM2.5 55 lbs/day 55 lbs/day
SOX 150 lbs/day 150 lbs/day
CO 550 lbs/day 550 lbs/day
Pb 3 lbs/day 3 lbs/day
lbs/day = Pounds Per Day
Source: Regional Thresholds presented in this table are based on the SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds, April 2019

4.2 LOCALIZED SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS
The analysis makes use of methodology included in the SCAQMD Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology (LST Methodology) (36). The SCAQMD has established that impacts to air quality are significant if there is a potential to contribute or cause localized exceedances of the NAAQS and CAAQS. Collectively, these are referred to as Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs). 3482
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
48 The SCAQMD established LSTs in response to the SCAQMD Governing Board’s Environmental Justice Initiative I-44
. LSTs represent the maximum emissions from a project that will not cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard at the nearest residence or sensitive receptor. The SCAQMD states that lead agencies can use the LSTs as another indicator of significance in its air quality impact analyses.

LSTs were developed in response to environmental justice and health concerns raised by the public regarding exposure of individuals to criteria pollutants in local communities. To address the issue of localized significance, the SCAQMD adopted LSTs that show whether a project would cause or contribute to localized air quality impacts and thereby cause or contribute to potential localized adverse health effects. The analysis makes use of methodology included in the LST Methodology (37).

4.2.1 APPLICABILITY OF LSTS FOR THE PROJECT
For this Project, the appropriate SRA for the LST analysis is Southwest San Bernardino Valley (SRA 33). LSTs apply to CO, NOX, PM10, and PM2.5. The SCAQMD produced look-up tables for projects less than or equal to 5 acres in size, however the look-up tables can be applied as a screening criterion for larger projects (see additional discussion in Section 4.2.2).

In order to determine the appropriate methodology for determining localized impacts that could occur as a result of Project-related construction, the following process is undertaken:

Identify the maximum daily on-site emissions that will occur during construction activity:
• The maximum daily on-site emissions could be based on information provided by the Project Applicant; or
• The SCAQMD’s Fact Sheet for Applying CalEEMod to Localized Significance Thresholds and CalEEMod User’s Guide Appendix A: Calculation Details for CalEEMod can be used to determine the maximum site acreage that is actively disturbed based on the construction equipment fleet and equipment hours as estimated in CalEEMod (38) (39).

If the total acreage disturbed is less than or equal to 5 acres per day, then the SCAQMD’s screening look-up tables are utilized to determine if a Project has the potential to result in a significant impact. The look-up tables establish a maximum daily emissions threshold in lbs/day that can be compared to CalEEMod outputs.

Since total acreage disturbed for the Project is likely greater than 5 acres per day throughout the construction process, then the SCAQMD recommends dispersion modeling to be conducted to determine the actual pollutant concentrations for applicable LSTs in the air. In other words, the maximum daily on-site emissions as calculated in CalEEMod are modeled via air dispersion modeling to calculate the actual concentration in the air (e.g., parts per million or micrograms per cubic meter) in order to determine if any applicable thresholds are exceeded. 4 The purpose of SCAQMD’s Environmental Justice program is to ensure that everyone has the right to equal protection from air pollution and fair access to the decision-making process that works to improve the quality of air within their communities. Further, the SCAQMD defines Environmental Justice as “…equitable environmental policymaking and enforcement to protect the health of all residents, regardless of age, culture, ethnicity, gender, race, socioeconomic status, or geographic location, from the health effects of air pollution.” 3483
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
49 4.2.1.1 MAXIMUM DAILY DISTURBED-ACREAGE
As a conservative measure, it is assumed that a maximum of 20 acres per day can be actively disturbed. In CalEEMod, the Total Acres Graded (TAG) field represents the cumulative distance traversed on the property by the grading equipment. In order to properly grade a piece of land, multiple passes with grading equipment may be required. So even though the lot size is a fixed number of acres, the TAG could be an order of magnitude higher than the footprint of the lot (39). TAG is a function of the maximum acreage disturbed per day times the number of days of the subphase of construction. As such, the “Total Acres Graded” field in CalEEMod has been revised to the following5:
• Phase 1
o Site Preparation: 1,700 acres (20 acres disturbed per day x 85 working days) o Grading: 3,080 acres (20 acres disturbed per day x 154 working days) • Phase 2
o Site Preparation: 2,200 acres (20 acres per day x 110 working days) o Grading: 3,460 acres (20 acres per day x 173 working days)

4.2.1.2 DISPERSION MODELING
In order to estimate localized pollutant concentrations resulting from Project construction, the SCAQMD-approved AERMOD dispersion model was utilized. The modeling approach utilized is discussed as follows:

SOURCES
It should be noted that in order to model worst-case conditions, the highest daily peak on-site emissions resulting from overlapping construction activity were modeled.

A ground level release height and a 1 meter (~3.28 feet) initial vertical dimension (sigma z) were utilized for fugitive emissions of PM10 and PM2.5 consistent with SCAQMD’s LST guidance.

In order to account for equipment exhaust emissions from NO2, and CO a release height of 5.0 meters was utilized consistent with SCAQMD’s LST guidance.

METEOROLOGICAL DATA AND MODEL OPTIONS
In order to account for meteorological conditions at the Project site, meteorological data from the SCAQMD’s Ontario Airport (KONT) monitoring station was utilized, as this is the nearest station to the Project site for which meteorological data is available. Additionally, a receptor height of 2 meters and regulatory default options were utilized consistent with SCAQMD’s LST guidance.
5 CalEEMod does not provide a “Total Acres Graded” field for Building Construction, Paving, or Architectural Coating activities. 3484
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
50 4.2.1.3 SENSITIVE RECEPTORS
As previously stated, LSTs represent the maximum emissions from a project that will not cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent applicable NAAQS and CAAQS at the nearest residence or sensitive receptor. Receptor locations are sites where individuals may be exposed to emissions from Project activities. For the purposes of this analysis, receptor sites have been established at on-site and off-site locations representative of land uses that could be maximally affected by Project-source air pollutant emissions.

RESIDENTIAL RECEPTORS
Some people are especially sensitive to air pollution and are given special consideration when evaluating air quality impacts from projects. These groups of people include children, the elderly, individuals with pre-existing respiratory or cardiovascular illness, and athletes and others who engage in frequent exercise. Structures that house these persons or places where they gather to exercise are defined as “sensitive receptors”. These structures typically include residences, hotels, hospitals, etc. as they are also known to be locations where an individual can remain for 24 hours. Consistent with the LST Methodology, the nearest land use where an individual could remain for 24 hours to the Project site (in this case the nearest residential land use) has been used to determine construction and operational air quality impacts for emissions of PM10 and PM2.5, since PM10 and PM2.5 thresholds are based on a 24-hour averaging time.

NON-RESIDENTIAL RECEPTORS
As per the LST Methodology, commercial and industrial facilities are not included in the definition of sensitive receptor because employees and patrons do not typically remain onsite for a full 24 hours but are typically onsite for 8 hours or less. The LST Methodology explicitly states that “LSTs based on shorter averaging periods, such as the NO2 and CO LSTs, could also be applied to receptors such as industrial or commercial facilities since it is reasonable to assume that a worker at these sites could be present for periods of one to eight hours (36).” For purposes of analysis, if an industrial/commercial use is located at a closer distance to the Project site than the nearest residential use, the nearest industrial/commercial use will be utilized to determine construction and operational LST air impacts for emissions of NO2 and CO an individual could be present at these sites for periods of 1 to 8 hours.

SENSITIVE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS
Sensitive receptors in the Project study area are illustrated at Exhibit 4-A and are described below:

R1: Location R1 represents the Colony High School Football Stadium, approximately 76 feet north of the Project site. R1 is placed in the bleachers just north of Planning Area (PA) 1.

R2: Location R2 represents the existing residence at 3271 S Quincy Way, approximately 219 feet east of the Project site. R2 is placed in the private outdoor living areas facing the Project site.
3485
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
51 R3: Location R3 represents an on-site receiver location within the planned PA7 residential mixed use overlay area. R3 is placed approximately 460 feet south of the light industrial use within PA 6A.

R4: Location R4 represents the existing residence at 10823 Edison Avenue, approximately 94 feet south of the Project site. Since there are no private outdoor living areas (backyard) facing the Project site, R4 is placed at the building’s façade.

R5: Location R5 represents the existing on-site residence at 3959 S Sunrise Avenue within the standalone residential overlay (PA4). R5 is placed in the private outdoor living areas facing the light industrial use within PA5A.

R6: Location R6 represents the existing residence at 3455 Pine Ridge Loop, approximately 150 feet west of the Project site. R6 is placed in the private outdoor living areas facing the Project site.

R7: Location R7 represents the existing residence at 3379 S Myrtle Drive, approximately 156 feet west of the Project site. R7 is placed in the private outdoor living areas facing the Project site.

R8: Location R8 represents the existing residence at 2943 S Alder Creek Drive, approximately 189 feet north of the Project site. R8 is placed in the private outdoor living areas facing the Project site.

3486
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
52 EXHIBIT 4-A: SENSITIVE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS
3487
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
53 This page intentionally left blank
3488
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
54 5 AIR QUALITY IMPACTS

5.1 INTRODUCTION
The Project has been evaluated to determine if it will violate an air quality standard, contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation, or determine if it will result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of a criteria pollutant for which the SCAB is non-attainment under an applicable NAAQS and CAAQS. Additionally, the Project has been evaluated to determine consistency with the applicable AQMP, exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, and the impacts of odors.

5.2 METHODOLOGY

5.2.1 CALEEMOD
Land uses such as the Project affect air quality through construction-source and operationalsource emissions.

In May 2022, the SCAQMD, in conjunction with the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) and other California air districts, released the latest version of the CalEEMod Version 2022.1. The purpose of this model is to calculate construction-source and operational-source criteria pollutant (VOCs, NOX, SOX, CO, PM10, and PM2.5) and GHG emissions from direct and indirect sources; and quantify applicable air quality and GHG reductions achieved from MMs (40). Accordingly, the latest version of CalEEMod has been used for this Project to determine construction and operational air quality emissions. Output from the model runs for both construction and operational activity are provided in Appendices 5.1, 5.3, and 5.4.

5.3 REGIONAL CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS

5.3.1 CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES
Construction activities associated with the Project will result in emissions of VOCs, NOX, SOX, CO, PM10, and PM2.5. Construction related emissions are expected from the following construction activities:

PHASE 1
• Site Preparation
• Grading
• Building Construction
• Paving
• Architectural Coating
PHASE 2
• Demolition
• Site Preparation
3489
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
55 • Grading
• Building Construction
• Paving
• Architectural Coating

GRADING ACTIVITIES
Dust is typically a major concern during grading activities. Because such emissions are not amenable to collection and discharge through a controlled source, they are called “fugitive emissions”. Fugitive dust emissions rates vary as a function of many parameters (soil silt, soil moisture, wind speed, area disturbed, number of vehicles, depth of disturbance or excavation, etc.). CalEEMod was utilized to calculate fugitive dust emissions resulting from grading activities.

Based on information provided by the Project Applicant, Project grading will balance on-site – that is, grading activities will not require substantial import of export of soils.

CONSTRUCTION WORKER VEHICLE TRIPS
Construction emissions for construction worker vehicles traveling to and from the Project site, as well as vendor trips (construction materials delivered to the Project site) were estimated based on information from CalEEMod defaults.

5.3.2 CONSTRUCTION DURATION
Construction is expected to commence in January 2023 and will end in December 2026. The construction schedule utilized in the analysis, shown in Table 5-1, represents a “worst-case” analysis scenario. Should construction occur any time after the respective dates indicated, emissions would be reduced. This is due to decreased emission factors for construction activities and construction equipment in future years, and increasing stringency of emission regulations. 6 The duration of construction activity and associated equipment represents a reasonable approximation of the expected construction fleet as required per CEQA Guidelines (1). 6 As shown in the CalEEMod User’s Guide Version 2022.1, Section 4.3 “OFFROAD Equipment” as the analysis year increases, emission factors for the same equipment pieces decrease due to the natural turnover of older equipment being replaced by newer less polluting equipment and new regulatory requirements.
3490
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
56 TABLE 5-1: CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
Phase Construction Activity Start Date End Date Days
Phase 1
Site Preparation 1/1/2023 4/30/2023 85
Grading 5/1/2023 11/30/2023 154
Building Construction 12/1/2023 12/31/2024 283
Paving 9/1/2024 12/31/2024 87
Architectural Coating 2/1/2024 12/31/2024 239
Phase 2
Demolition 1/1/2024 3/31/2024 65
Site Preparation 4/1/2024 8/31/2024 110
Grading 9/1/2024 4/30/2025 173
Building Construction 5/1/2025 12/31/2026 436
Paving 9/1/2026 12/31/2026 88
Architectural Coating 6/1/2026 12/31/2026 154

5.3.3 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT
Site specific construction fleet may vary due to specific project needs at the time of construction.

A detailed summary of construction equipment assumptions by phase is provided at Table 5-2.

TABLE 5-2: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ASSUMPTIONS
Phase Construction Activity Equipment Amount Hours Per Day Phase 1
Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers 9 8
Crawler Tractors 12 8
Grading
Excavators 6 8
Graders 3 8
Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8
Scrapers 6 8
Crawler Tractors 6 8
Building Construction
Cranes 3 8
Forklifts 9 8
Generator Sets 3 8
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 9 8
Welders 3 8
Paving
Pavers 6 8
Paving Equipment 6 8
3491
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
57 Phase Construction Activity Equipment Amount Hours Per Day Rollers 6 8
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 3 8
Phase 2
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws 3 8
Excavators 9 8
Rubber Tired Dozers 6 8
Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers 9 8
Crawler Tractors 12 8
Grading
Excavators 6 8
Graders 3 8
Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8
Scrapers 6 8
Crawler Tractors 6 8
Building Construction
Cranes 3 8
Forklifts 9 8
Generator Sets 3 8
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 9 8
Welders 3 8
Paving
Pavers 6 8
Paving Equipment 6 8
Rollers 6 8
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 3 8

5.3.4 ON-ROAD TRIPS
Construction generates on-road vehicle emissions from vehicle usage for workers, hauling, and vendors commuting to and from the site. The number of worker and vendor trips are presented below in Table 5-3.

TABLE 5-3: CONSTRUCTION TRIP ASSUMPTIONS
Phase Construction Activity Worker Trips
Per Day
Vendor Trips
Per Day
Hauling Trips
Per Day
Phase 1
Site Preparation 53 152 0
Grading 60 275 0
Building Construction 3,874 505 0
Paving 45 0 0
3492
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
58 Phase Construction Activity Worker Trips
Per Day
Vendor Trips
Per Day
Hauling Trips
Per Day
Architectural Coating 775 0 0
Phase 2
Demolition 45 33 6
Site Preparation 53 55 0
Grading 60 87 0
Building Construction 1,901 219 0
Paving 45 0 0
Architectural Coating 380 0 0

5.3.5 CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS SUMMARY

IMPACTS WITHOUT MITIGATION
CalEEMod calculates maximum daily emissions for summer and winter periods. As such, the estimated maximum daily construction emissions without mitigation for both summer and winter periods are summarized on Table 5-4. The maximum daily emissions would occur in 2024 during overlap between Phase 1 and Phase 2 construction activities. Detailed unmitigated construction model outputs are presented in Appendix 5.1. Under the assumed scenarios, emissions resulting from the Project construction will exceed criteria pollutant thresholds established by the SCAQMD for emissions of VOCs, NOX, and CO.

TABLE 5-4: MAXIMUM DAILY CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS – WITHOUT MITIGATION Year Emissions (lbs/day)
VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5
Summer
2023 (Phase 1) 15.10 147.00 122.00 0.25 26.60 15.60
2024 (Phase 1) 286.00 105.00 484.00 0.24 68.80 18.50
2024 (Phase 2) 13.80 130.00 111.00 0.21 24.90 14.60
2025 (Phase 2) 12.60 101.00 195.00 0.21 28.20 7.73
2026 (Phase 2) 199.00 73.20 248.00 0.17 34.70 9.84
Winter
2023 (Phase 1) 24.40 147.00 323.00 0.25 57.00 15.60
2024 (Phase 1) 285.00 109.00 387.00 0.24 68.80 18.50
2024 (Phase 2) 12.20 116.00 99.60 0.21 14.90 8.26
2025 (Phase 2) 12.00 101.00 158.00 0.21 28.20 7.73
2026 (Phase 2) 198.00 74.50 207.00 0.17 34.70 9.84
Maximum Daily Emissions 299.80 235.00 595.00 0.45 93.70 33.10 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? YES YES YES NO NO NO
3493
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
59 IMPACTS WITH MITIGATION
As previously stated, the Project will implement MMs AQ-1 through AQ-6 which would reduce the severity of impacts. As shown in Table 5-5, after implementation of MMs AQ-1 through AQ6, Project construction-source emissions would exceed criteria pollutant thresholds established by the SCAQMD for emissions of NOX and CO. Detailed mitigated construction model outputs are presented in Appendix 5.2.

TABLE 5-5: MAXIMUM DAILY CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS – WITH MITIGATION Year Emissions (lbs/day)
VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5
Summer
2023 (Phase 1) 3.03 70.40 120.00 0.25 19.40 8.96
2024 (Phase 1) 70.10 97.70 491.00 0.24 66.60 16.50
2024 (Phase 2) 2.85 63.20 115.00 0.21 18.50 8.69
2025 (Phase 2) 10.20 63.00 201.00 0.21 27.20 6.79
2026 (Phase 2) 49.30 73.10 256.00 0.17 33.10 8.45
Winter
2023 (Phase 1) 21.70 74.50 329.00 0.25 55.60 13.60
2024 (Phase 1) 68.60 102.00 394.00 0.24 66.60 16.50
2024 (Phase 2) 2.83 63.30 114.00 0.21 10.10 3.91
2025 (Phase 2) 9.69 63.10 164.00 0.21 27.20 6.79
2026 (Phase 2) 48.60 74.40 215.00 0.17 33.10 8.45
Maximum Daily Emissions 72.95 165.30 606.00 0.45 85.10 25.19 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? NO YES YES NO NO NO

5.4 REGIONAL OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS
Operational activities associated with the Project will result in emissions of VOCs, NOX, SOX, CO, PM10, and PM2.5. Operational emissions would be expected from the following primary sources:
• Area Source Emissions
• Energy Source Emissions
• Mobile Source Emissions
• On-Site Equipment Source Emissions
• TRU Source Emissions
• Gasoline Dispensing Emissions
3494
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
60 5.4.1 AREA SOURCE EMISSIONS
CalEEMod estimates area source emissions for the following sources: architectural coating, consumer products, and landscape maintenance equipment. Detailed operational model outputs are presented in Appendix 5.3.

ARCHITECTURAL COATING
Over a period of time, the buildings that are part of this Project will be subject to emissions resulting from the evaporation of solvents contained in paints, varnishes, primers, and other surface coatings as part of Project maintenance. The emissions associated with architectural coatings were calculated using CalEEMod.

CONSUMER PRODUCTS
Consumer products include, but are not limited to detergents, cleaning compounds, polishes, personal care products, and lawn and garden products. Many of these products contain organic compounds which when released in the atmosphere can react to form O3 and other photochemically reactive pollutants. The emissions associated with use of consumer products were calculated based on defaults provided within CalEEMod.

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT
Landscape maintenance equipment would generate emissions from fuel combustion and evaporation of unburned fuel. Equipment in this category would include lawnmowers, shedders/grinders, blowers, trimmers, chain saws, and hedge trimmers used to maintain the landscaping of the Project. It should be noted that as October 9, 2021, Governor Gavin Newsom signed AB 1346. The bill aims to ban the sale of new gasoline-powered equipment under 25 gross horsepower (known as small off-road engines [SOREs]) by 2024. For purposes of analysis, the emissions associated with landscape maintenance equipment were calculated based on assumptions provided in CalEEMod. It should be noted that the version of CalEEMod that was employed for this analysis does not account for AB 1346. As such, emissions associated with landscape maintenance equipment are conservative.

5.4.2 ENERGY SOURCE EMISSIONS
Electricity and natural gas are used by almost every project. Criteria pollutant emissions are emitted through the generation of electricity and consumption of natural gas. However, because electrical generating facilities for the Project area are located either outside the region (state) or offset through the use of pollution credits (RECLAIM) for generation within the SCAB, criteria pollutant emissions from offsite generation of electricity are generally excluded from the evaluation of significance and only natural gas use is considered.

INTEGRATED ENERGY POLICY REPORT
Project building operations and Project site maintenance activities would result in the consumption of natural gas and electricity. Natural gas would be supplied to the Project by 3495
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
61 Southern California Gas (SoCalGas) and electricity would be supplied to the Project by Southern California Edison (SCE).

5.4.3 MOBILE SOURCE EMISSIONS
The Project related operational emissions derive primarily from vehicle trips generated by the Project. Trip characteristics available from the Rich Haven Specific Plan Traffic Analysis were utilized in this analysis (4). The mobile-source emissions were calculated based on trip rates and trip lengths. Detailed operational model outputs are presented in Appendices 5.4 through 5.7.

Per the Rich Haven Specific Plan Traffic Analysis, at buildout the Project is expected to generate a total of approximately of 95,552 trip-ends per day with 8,079 AM peak hour trips and 8,036 PM peak hour trips (in actual vehicles) (4).

5.4.3.1 APPROACH FOR ANALYSIS

TRIP RATES
The trip generation rates used for this analysis are consistent with the rates provided in the Rich Haven Specific Plan Traffic Analysis which are based upon information collected by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) as provided in the Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition, 2021 (4).

TRIP LENGTHS
To determine emissions associated with the retail, active park, and public park land uses from all vehicle types (Light-Duty-Auto vehicles [LDA], Light-Duty Trucks [LDT1]7, Light-Duty Trucks [LDT2]8, Medium-Duty Trucks [MDV], Other Buses [OBUS9], Urban Buses [UBUS10], Motorcycle [MCY], School Buses [SBUS], and Motor Homes [MH], heavy duty trucks (2-axle/Light-Heavy-Duty Trucks [LHDT111 and LHDT212], 3-axle/Medium-Heavy-Duty Trucks [MHDT], and 4+-axle/HeavyHeavy-Duty Trucks [HHDT]), the CalEEMod default for vehicle type, trip purpose and one-way trip length was employed. In order to determine emissions from passenger car vehicles, CalEEMod defaults for trip length and trip purpose were utilized (41). Default vehicle trip lengths for primary trips will be populated using data from the local metropolitan planning organizations/Regional Transportation Planning Agencies (MPO/RTPA). Trip type percentages and trip lengths provided by MPO/RTPAs truncate data at their demonstrative borders.

To determine emissions from passenger car vehicles associated with the high-cube fulfillment center and business park uses, the CalEEMod defaults for trip purpose and a trip length were utilized. It should also be noted that for purposes of this analysis, passenger cars related to the high-cube fulfillment center and business park uses include LDA, LDT1, LDT2, MDV, and MCY 7 Vehicles under the LDT1 category have a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of less than 6,000 lbs. and equivalent test weight (ETW) of less than or equal to 3,750 lbs. 8 Vehicles under the LDT2 category have a GVWR of less than 6,000 lbs. and ETW between 3,751 lbs. and 5,750 lbs. 9 OBUS vehicle classes refers to all other buses except school buses and urban buses. 10 UBUS vehicle classes consist of natural gas buses, gasoline buses, and diesel buses. 11 Vehicles under the LHDT1 category have a GVWR of less than 8,501-10,000 lbs. 12 Vehicles under the LHDT2 category have a GVWR of less than 10,001-14,000 lbs. 3496
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
62 vehicle types. The CalEEMod default fleet mix was utilized for residential, retail, and recreational land uses. To account for emissions generated by passenger cars accessing the business park, high-cube cold storage, high-cube fulfillment, and high-cube transload land uses the following fleet mix was utilized in this analysis:

TABLE 5-6: PASSENGER CAR FLEET MIX
Land Use
% Vehicle Type
LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV MCY
Phase 1 (2024) 54.62% 4.53% 21.75% 16.80% 2.30%
Buildout (2027) 53.99% 4.16% 23.01% 16.58% 2.26%
Note: The Project-specific passenger car fleet mix used in this analysis is based on a proportional split utilizing the default CalEEMod percentages assigned to LDA, LDT1, LDT2, MDV, and MCY vehicle types.

To determine emissions from trucks for the proposed industrial uses, the analysis incorporated the SCAQMD recommended truck trip length of 14.2 miles for 2-axle (LHDT1 and LHDT2) trucks,

15.3 miles for 3-axle (MHDT) trucks, and 39.9 miles for 4+-axle (HHDT) trucks and weighting the average trip lengths using traffic trip percentages taken from the Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Traffic Study. The trip length function for the industrial uses has been conservatively calculated to 31.31 miles, with an assumption of 100% primary trips for the proposed industrial land uses. This trip length assumption is higher than the CalEEMod default trip length. Heavy trucks are broken down by truck type (or axle type) and are categorized as either Light-HeavyDuty Trucks (LHDT113 & LHDT2 14)/2-axle, Medium-Heavy-Duty Trucks (MHDT)/3-axle, and Heavy-Heavy-Duty Trucks (HHDT)/4+-axle. To account for emissions generated by trucks, the following fleet mix was utilized in this analysis:

TABLE 5-7: TRUCK FLEET MIX
Land Use
% Vehicle Type
LHDT1 LHDT2 MHDT HHDT
Phase 1 (2024) 15.76% 4.25% 14.25% 65.73%
Buildout (2027) 15.71% 4.30% 14.25% 65.73%
Note: Project-specific truck fleet mix is based on the number of trips generated by each truck type (LHDT1, LHDT2, MHDT, and HHDT) relative to the total number of truck trips.

FUGITIVE DUST RELATED TO VEHICULAR TRAVEL
Vehicles traveling on paved roads would be a source of fugitive emissions due to the generation of road dust inclusive of brake and tire wear particulates. The emissions estimates for travel on paved roads were calculated using CalEEMod.
13 Vehicles under the LHDT1 category have a GVWR of 8,501 to 10,000 lbs. 14 Vehicles under the LHDT2 category have a GVWR of 10,001 to 14,000 lbs. 3497
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
63 5.4.4 TRUSOURCE EMISSIONS
In order to account for the possibility of refrigerated uses, trucks associated with the assumed 454,244 square feet of cold-storage land use are assumed to also have TRUs. Therefore, for modeling purposes 174 trucks (348 two-way truck trips per day) have the potential to include TRUs. TRUs are accounted for during on-site and off-site travel. The TRU calculations are based on EMissions FACtor Model version 2021 (EMFAC2021), developed by the CARB. EMFAC2021 does not provide emission rates per hour or mile as with the on-road emission model and only provides emission inventories. Emission results are produced in tons per day while all activity, fuel consumption and horsepower hours were reported at annual levels. The emission inventory is based on specific assumptions including the average horsepower rating of specific types of equipment and the hours of operation annually. These assumptions are not always consistent with assumptions used in the modeling of project level emissions. Therefore, the emissions inventory was converted into emission rates to accurately calculate emissions from TRU operation associated with project level details. This was accomplished by converting the annual horsepower hours to daily operational characteristics and converting the daily emission levels into hourly emission rates based on the total emission of each criteria pollutant by equipment type and the average daily hours of operation.

5.4.5 ON-SITE CARGO HANDLING EQUIPMENT EMISSIONS
It is common for warehouse buildings to require the operation of exterior cargo handling equipment in the building’s truck court areas. For this particular Project, on-site modeled operational equipment includes up to ten (10) 200 horsepower (hp), compressed natural gas or gasoline-powered tractors/loaders/backhoes operating at 4 hours a day15 for 365 days of the year.

5.4.6 GASOLINE DISPENSING EMISSIONS
Operational VOC emissions have been analyzed using CalEEMod analysis software and methodology and are based on the default assumptions for a convenience store with fueling positions use. The operational VOC emissions estimates associated with this use was previously shown in Table 3-8.

Operational VOC emissions would occur through the storage, transfer, and dispensing of gasoline. The enhanced vapor recovery systems required by SCAQMD Rule 461 would substantially reduce VOC emissions and mitigate any potential for the proposed gas station to exceed the daily emissions thresholds set by SCAQMD.

For example, SCAQMD Rule 461 sets a maximum limit of 0.15 pounds of VOC per 1,000 gallons from the storage, transfer and dispensing of gasoline and 0.38 pounds of VOC per 1,000 gallons from the dispensing of gasoline into vehicle fuel tanks for a total of 0.53 pounds of VOC per 1,000 gallons of gasoline. Because anticipated gasoline dispensing volumes were not available at the 15 Based on Table II-3, Port and Rail Cargo Handling Equipment Demographics by Type, from CARB’s Technology Assessment: Mobile Cargo Handling Equipment document, a single piece of equipment could operate up to 2 hours per day (Total Average Annual Activity divided by Total Number Pieces of Equipment). As such, the analysis conservatively assumes that the tractor/loader/backhoe would operate up to 4 hours per day.
3498
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
64 time of this analysis, it was conservatively estimated that each 16-vehicle fueling position (VFP) gas station would dispense 12,300,000 gallons per year. By dividing the throughput per day by 1,000 and then multiplying by 0.53, it was determined that each gas station would result in 17.86 pounds of additional VOC emissions per day from gasoline dispensing.

5.4.7 OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS SUMMARY
Project mobile source emissions impacts are dependent on both overall daily vehicle trip generation and the effect of the Project on peak hour traffic volumes and traffic operations in the vicinity of the Project. The Project related operational air quality impacts derive primarily from vehicle trips generated by the Project.

The estimated operational-source emissions for the proposed Project are summarized on Table 5-8 for Phase 1 (2024) and Table 5-9 for Project Buildout (2027). Detailed operational model outputs are presented in Appendices 5.3 and 5.4. As shown, the proposed Project will exceed the applicable SCAQMD thresholds for VOC, NOX, and CO for Phase 1, and VOC, NOX, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 at Project Buildout. As such, Project operational emissions during Phase 1 and at Buildout would result in a significant and unavoidable impact.

TABLE 5-8: SUMMARY OF PEAK OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS – PHASE 1 (2024) Source Emissions (lbs/day)
VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5
Summer
Mobile Source 242.00 295.00 1,792.00 4.59 141.00 29.10
Area Source 236.00 61.40 387.00 0.39 4.95 5.04
Energy Source 2.27 39.90 24.30 0.25 3.14 3.14
TRU Source 12.61 13.81 1.50 0.00 0.59 0.54
On-Site Equipment 1.17 3.75 164.45 0.00 0.29 0.27
Gasoline Dispensing 53.58 0 0 0 0 0
Total Maximum Daily Emissions 547.63 413.87 2,369.25 5.23 149.97 38.09 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? YES YES YES NO NO NO
Winter
Mobile Source 224.00 314.00 1,545.00 4.36 141.00 29.10
Area Source 193.00 58.00 24.70 0.37 4.69 4.69
Energy Source 2.27 39.90 24.30 0.25 3.14 3.14
TRU Source 12.61 13.81 1.50 0.00 0.59 0.54
On-Site Equipment 1.17 3.75 164.45 0.00 0.29 0.27
Gasoline Dispensing 53.58 0 0 0 0 0
Total Maximum Daily Emissions 486.63 429.47 1,759.95 4.98 149.71 37.74 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? YES YES YES NO NO NO
3499
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
65 TABLE 5-9: SUMMARY OF PEAK OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS – PROJECT BUILDOUT (2027) Source
Emissions (lbs/day)
VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5
Summer
Mobile Source 455.00 432.00 3,250.00 8.48 287.00 57.00
Area Source 350.00 99.80 581.00 0.63 8.01 8.13
Energy Source 3.45 60.50 35.70 0.38 4.77 4.77
TRU Source 12.61 13.81 1.50 0.00 0.59 0.54
On-Site Equipment 1.17 3.75 164.45 0.00 0.29 0.27
Gasoline Dispensing 107.16 0 0 0 0 0
Total Maximum Daily Emissions 929.39 609.87 4,032.65 9.49 300.66 70.71 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? YES YES YES NO YES YES
Winter
Mobile Source 424.00 460.00 2,800.00 8.00 287.00 57.10
Area Source 289.30 94.70 40.30 0.60 7.66 7.66
Energy Source 3.45 60.50 35.70 0.38 4.77 4.77
TRU Source 12.61 13.81 1.50 0.00 0.59 0.54
On-Site Equipment 1.17 3.75 164.45 0.00 0.29 0.27
Gasoline Dispensing 107.16 0 0 0 0 0
Total Maximum Daily Emissions 837.69 632.77 3,041.95 8.98 300.31 70.34 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? YES YES YES NO YES YES

5.5 CONSTRUCTION-SOURCE LOCALIZED EMISSIONS

IMPACTS WITHOUT MITIGATION
As shown in Table 5-10, with mitigation, localized construction emissions would not exceed the applicable SCAQMD LSTs for emissions of any criterial pollutant. Emissions associated with peak Phase 1 building construction, paving, and architectural coating and Phase 2 grading activities have been considered for purposes of the LST analysis, since these overlapping phases represent the maximum localized emissions that would occur. Any other construction phases of development that overlap would result in lesser emissions and consequently lesser impacts than what is disclosed herein. Outputs from the model runs for unmitigated construction LSTs are provided in Appendix 5.1. AERMOD modeling outputs for construction are provided in Appendix

5.5. 3500
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
66 TABLE 5-10: LOCALIZED SIGNIFICANCE SUMMARY – PEAK CONSTRUCTION (WITH MITIGATION) Peak Construction
CO NO2 PM10 PM2.5
Averaging Time
1-Hour 8-Hour 1-Hour 24-
Hours
24-
Hours
Peak Day Localized Emissions 0.03 0.01 1.23E-02 0.41 0.16 Background Concentration A 1.6 1.3 0.101
Total Concentration 1.63 1.31 0.11 0.41 0.16
SCAQMD Localized Significance Threshold 20 9 0.18 10.4 10.4 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO
A Highest concentration from the last three years of available data.

Note: PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations are expressed in µg/m3. All others are expressed in ppm

5.6 OPERATIONAL-SOURCE LOCALIZED EMISSIONS
The LST analysis generally includes on-site sources (area, energy, mobile – are previously discussed in Section 5.4 of this report). However, it should be noted that the CalEEMod outputs do not separate on-site and off-site emissions from mobile sources. It should be noted that the longest on-site distance is approximately 1.0 miles. As such, a separate CalEEMod run for operational LSTs has been prepared which accounts for the 1.0-mile on-site travel distance.

Outputs from the model run for operational LSTs are provided in Appendix 5.4.

SUMMARY OF OPERATIONAL LST IMPACTS
The on-site operational emissions for NOX, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 are compared to the respective LSTs as previously shown in Table 4-5. As shown on Table 5-11 operational emissions will not exceed the LST thresholds. Therefore, the Project will have a less than significant localized impact during operational activity and no mitigation is required.

TABLE 5-11: LOCALIZED SIGNIFICANCE SUMMARY – OPERATION (PROJECT BUILDOUT) Peak Operation
CO NO2 PM10 PM2.5
Averaging Time
1-Hour 8-Hour 1-Hour 24-
Hours
24-
Hours
Peak Day Localized Emissions 1.19E-01 9.06E-02 1.31E-02 1.98 0.81 Background Concentration A 1.6 1.3 0.101
Total Concentration 1.72 1.39 0.11 1.98 0.81
SCAQMD Localized Significance Threshold 20 9 0.18 2.5 2.5 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO
A Highest concentration from the last three years of available data.

Note: PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations are expressed in µg/m3. All others are expressed in ppm 3501
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
67 5.7 CO“HOT SPOT” ANALYSIS
As discussed below, the Project would not result in potentially adverse CO concentrations or “hotspots.” Further, detailed modeling of Project-specific CO “hotspots” is not needed to reach this conclusion. An adverse CO concentration, known as a “hot spot”, would occur if an exceedance of the state one-hour standard of 20 ppm or the eight-hour standard of 9 ppm were to occur. At the time of the SCAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook (1993) (1993 CEQA Handbook), the SCAB was designated nonattainment under the CAAQS and NAAQS for CO (42).

The determination of a potential CO hotspot is focused on the mobile-source vehicular activity that would occur at intersections in the Project-area. Aircraft-related emissions are not concentrated enough, in a particular location such that they would have a propensity to result in a CO hotspot and therefore aircraft emissions are not a consideration in determining CO hotspots.

It has long been recognized that CO hotspots are caused by vehicular emissions, primarily when idling at congested intersections. In response, vehicle emissions standards have become increasingly stringent in the last twenty years. Currently, the allowable CO emissions standard in California is a maximum of 3.4 grams/mile for passenger cars (there are requirements for certain vehicles that are more stringent). With the turnover of older vehicles, introduction of cleaner fuels, and implementation of increasingly sophisticated and efficient emissions control technologies, CO concentration in the SCAB is now designated as attainment.

To establish a more accurate record of baseline CO concentrations affecting the SCAB, a CO “hot spot” analysis was conducted in 2003 for four busy intersections in Los Angeles at the peak morning and afternoon time periods. This “hot spot” analysis did not predict any violation of CO standards, as shown on Table 5-12.

TABLE 5-12: CO MODEL RESULTS
Intersection Location
CO Concentrations (ppm)
Morning 1-hour Afternoon 1-hour 8-hour
Wilshire Boulevard/Veteran Avenue 4.6 3.5 3.7
Sunset Boulevard/Highland Avenue 4 4.5 3.5
La Cienega Boulevard/Century Boulevard 3.7 3.1 5.2
Long Beach Boulevard/Imperial Highway 3 3.1 8.4
Source: 2003 AQMP, Appendix V: Modeling and Attainment Demonstrations Notes: Federal 1-hour standard is 35 ppm and the deferral 8-hour standard is 9.0 ppm.

Based on the SCAQMD's 2003 AQMP and the 1992 Federal Attainment Plan for Carbon Monoxide (1992 CO Plan), peak carbon monoxide concentrations in the SCAB were a result of unusual meteorological and topographical conditions and not a result of traffic volumes and congestion at a particular intersection. As evidence of this, for example, 8.4 ppm 8-hr CO concentration measured at the Long Beach Blvd. and Imperial Hwy. intersection (highest CO generating intersection within the “hot spot” analysis), only 0.7 ppm was attributable to the traffic volumes 3502
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
68 and congestion at this intersection; the remaining 7.7 ppm were due to the ambient air measurements at the time the 2003 AQMP was prepared (43). In contrast, an adverse CO concentration, known as a “hot spot”, would occur if an exceedance of the state one-hour standard of 20 parts per million (ppm) or the eight-hour standard of 9 ppm were to occur.

The ambient 1-hr and 8-hr CO concentration within the Project study area is estimated to be 1.5 ppm and 1.2 ppm, respectively (data from I-10 Near Road station for 2020). Therefore, even if the traffic volumes for the proposed Project were double or even triple of the traffic volumes generated at the Long Beach Blvd. and Imperial Hwy. intersection, coupled with the on-going improvements in ambient air quality, the Project would not be capable of resulting in a CO “hot spot” at any study area intersections.

The 2003 AQMP, and as previously shown in Table 5-12, estimated that the 1-hour concentration for the Wilshire Boulevard and Veteran Avenue intersection was 4.6 ppm; this indicates that, should the daily traffic volume increase four times to 400,000 vehicles per day, CO concentrations (4.6 ppm x 4= 18.4 ppm) would still not likely exceed the most stringent 1-hour CO standard (20.0 ppm).16 The highest trips on a segment of road that the Project would generate is 73,850 vehicles per day on the I-15 Southbound (SB) Ramps and Galleano Ranch Road (4).

Traffic volumes generating the CO concentrations for the “hot spot” analysis is shown on Table 5-13. The busiest intersection evaluated for traffic volumes was at La Cienega Boulevard and Century Boulevard, which has a traffic volume of approximately 8,674 vph (43). As shown on Table 5-14, the highest trips on a segment of road for the proposed Project is 7,935 vph on Hamner Avenue and Ontario Ranch Road. As such, Project-related traffic volumes are less than the traffic volumes identified in the 2003 AQMP. The Project considered herein would not produce the volume of traffic required to generate a CO “hot spot” either in the context of the 2003 Los Angeles hot spot study or based on representative BAAQMD CO threshold considerations. Therefore, CO “hot spots” are not an environmental impact of concern for the Project.

TABLE 5-13: TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Intersection Location
Peak Traffic Volumes (vph)
Eastbound
(AM/PM)
Westbound
(AM/PM)
Southbound
(AM/PM)
Northbound
(AM/PM)
Total
(AM/PM)
Wilshire Boulevard/Veteran Avenue 4,954/2,069 1,830/3,317 721/1,400 560/933 8,062/7,719 Sunset Boulevard/Highland Avenue 1,417/1,764 1,342/1,540 2,304/1,832 1,551/2,238 6,614/5,374 La Cienega Boulevard/Century Boulevard 2,540/2,243 1,890/2,728 1,384/2,029 821/1,674 6,634/8,674 Long Beach Boulevard/Imperial Highway 1,217/2,020 1,760/1,400 479/944 756/1,150 4,212/5,514 16 Based on the ratio of the CO standard (20.0 ppm) and the modeled value (4.6 ppm). 3503
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
69 TABLE 5-14: OPENING YEAR CUMULATIVE (2027) WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES Intersection Location
Peak Traffic Volumes (vph)
Northbound
(AM/PM)
Southbound
(AM/PM)
Eastbound
(AM/PM)
Westbound
(AM/PM)
Total
(AM/PM)
Hamner Ave. & Ontario Ranch Rd. 1,499/1,383 921/1,306 2,304/2,769 2,524/2,477 7,249/7,935 I-15 SB Ramps & Cantu Galleano Rd. 0/0 1,916/2,046 2,237/2,875 1,481/1,452 5,635/6,373 Haven Ave. & Ontario Ranch Rd. 730/457 1,412/1,654 1,494/2,065 1,998/2,052 5,634/6,227 Haven Ave. & SR-60 WB Ramps 2,654/1,610 1,346/2,462 0/0 909/885 4,910/4,956

5.8 AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLANNING
The Project site is located within the SCAB, which is characterized by relatively poor air quality.

The SCAQMD has jurisdiction over an approximately 10,743 square-mile area consisting of the four-county Basin and the Los Angeles County and Riverside County portions of what used to be referred to as the Southeast Desert Air Basin. In these areas, the SCAQMD is principally responsible for air pollution control, and works directly with the SCAG, county transportation commissions, local governments, as well as state and federal agencies to reduce emissions from stationary, mobile, and indirect sources to meet state and federal ambient air quality standards.

Currently, these state and federal air quality standards are exceeded in most parts of the SCAB.

In response, the SCAQMD has adopted a series of AQMPs to meet the state and federal ambient air quality standards. AQMPs are updated regularly in order to more effectively reduce emissions, accommodate growth, and to minimize any negative fiscal impacts of air pollution control on the economy.

In March 2017, the SCAQMD released the 2016 AQMP. The 2016 AQMP continues to evaluate current integrated strategies and control measures to meet the NAAQS, and to explore new and innovative methods to reach its goals. Some of these approaches include utilizing incentive programs, recognizing existing co-benefit programs from other sectors, and developing a strategy with fair-share reductions at the federal, state, and local levels (44). Similar to the 2012 AQMP, the 2016 AQMP incorporates scientific and technological information and planning assumptions, including the RTP/SCS, a planning document that supports the integration of land use and transportation to help the region meet the federal Clean Air Act requirements (19). The Project’s consistency with the AQMP will be determined using the 2016 AQMP as discussed below.

Criteria for determining consistency with the AQMP are defined in Chapter 12, Section 12.2 and Section 12.3 of the 1993 CEQA Handbook (45). These indicators are discussed below:

5.8.1 CONSISTENCY CRITERION NO. 1
To be considered consistent with Criterion No. 1, the proposed Project would not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to 3504
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
70 new violations or delay the timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emissions reductions specified in the AQMP.

The violations that Consistency Criterion No. 1 refers to are the CAAQS and NAAQS. CAAQS and NAAQS violations would occur if regional or localized significance thresholds were exceeded.

Construction Impacts – Consistency Criterion No. 1
Consistency Criterion No. 1 refers to violations of the CAAQS and NAAQS. CAAQS and NAAQS violations would occur if LSTs or regional significance thresholds were exceeded. As evaluated, the Project’s regional construction emissions would exceed the applicable regional significance thresholds for emissions of VOCs, NOX, and CO even after implementation of mitigation measures. Localized construction-source emissions would not exceed applicable LST thresholds.

As such, even with implementation of mitigation measures, Project construction-source emissions would be significant and unavoidable. Project construction-source emissions would therefore conflict with Consistency Criterion 1.

Operational Impacts – Consistency Criterion No. 1
The Project would not exceed the applicable LSTs for operational activity. However, the Project’s operational-source emissions are anticipated to exceed the regional thresholds of significance for VOC, NOX, CO, PM10 and PM 2.5 emissions. MM AQ-7 through MM AQ-20 are designed to reduce Project operational-source emissions. However, as there is no way to meaningfully quantify these reductions in CalEEMod, no emissions credit has been taken in the analysis. As such, even with application of MM AQ-7 through MM AQ-20, Project operational-source emissions impacts would be significant and unavoidable. Project operational-source emissions would therefore conflict with Consistency Criterion 1.

On the basis of the preceding discussion, the Project is determined to be inconsistent with Consistency Criterion No. 1.

5.8.2 CONSISTENCY CRITERION NO. 2
To be considered consistent with Criterion No. 2, the Project would not exceed the assumptions in the AQMP based on the years of Project build-out phase.

The 2016 AQMP demonstrates that the applicable ambient air quality standards can be achieved within the timeframes required under federal law. Growth projections from local general plans adopted by cities in the district are provided to the SCAG, which develops regional growth forecasts, which are then used to develop future air quality forecasts for the AQMP. Development consistent with the growth projections in City of Ontario General Plan is considered to be consistent with the AQMP.

Construction Impacts – Consistency Criterion No. 2
The Project is consistent with TOP 2050, and therefore would not result in growth exceeding SCAG projections, or emissions attributable to growth projections modeled by SCAG. Moreover, peak day emissions generated by construction activities are largely independent of land use assignments, but rather are a function of development scope and maximum area of disturbance. 3505
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
71 Irrespective of the site’s land use designation, development of the site to its maximum potential would likely occur, with disturbance of the entire site occurring during construction activities. On this basis, Project construction-source emissions would not conflict with Criterion No. 2.

Operational Impacts – Consistency Criterion 2
General Plan Consistency
Uses proposed by the Project are allowed under the site’s current General Plan (Policy Plan) Land Use designations. No General Plan Amendment (GPA) is required in conjunction with the Project.

The Project would not result in growth or development not anticipated under the AQMP. Project operational-source emissions are reflected in the AQMP assumptions and would not result in AQMP inconsistencies.

Regional Plan Consistency
Development of the City pursuant to the General Plan is reflected in Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) planning efforts and policies including: The 2016 – 2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCAG) April 2016 (2016 – 2040 RTP/SCS). Development of the City pursuant to the General Plan is also reflected in the recentlyadopted 2020 – 2045 RTP/SCS (SCAG) September 2020 (Connect SoCal). The Project is consistent with the General Plan and by extension is reflected in SCAG planning efforts and policies.

The Final 2008 Regional Comprehensive Plan (SCAG) 2008 (2008 RCP) defines a vision for the SCAG region to be implemented under a strategic plan addressing the regions interrelated housing, traffic, water and air quality issues. The 2008 RCP does not mandate planning actions.

SCAG does however request that local governments consider the 2008 RCP recommendations in developing or amending local plans, codes, design guidelines, and other related actions. SCAG promotes use of the 2008 RCP as an advisory policy document for voluntary use by local agencies.

The Project does not propose or require actions that would somehow conflict with 2008 RCP advisory policies.

On this basis, Project operational-source emissions would not conflict with Criterion No. 2.

5.8.3 AQMP CONSISTENCY CONCLUSION
As presented above, the Project is consistent with AQMP Consistency Criteria No. 2, and in this respect would not conflict with the AQMP. However, Project construction-source emissions would exceed applicable SCAQMD regional thresholds for emissions of VOCs, NOX, and CO.

Operational-source emissions would exceed the applicable SCAQMD regional thresholds for VOCs, NOX, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 As such, the Project would be inconsistent with AQMP Consistency Criteria No.1. On this basis, the Project would conflict with the AQMP.

5.9 POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO SENSITIVE RECEPTORS
The potential impact of Project-generated air pollutant emissions on sensitive receptors has also been considered. Sensitive receptors can include uses such as long-term health care facilities, 3506
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
72 rehabilitation centers, and retirement homes. Residences, schools, playgrounds, childcare centers, and athletic facilities can also be considered as sensitive receptors.

Results of the LST analysis indicate that the Project would not exceed the SCAQMD localized significance thresholds during construction. Therefore, sensitive receptors would not be exposed to substantial pollutant concentrations during Project construction.

Results of the LST analysis indicate that the Project would not exceed the SCAQMD localized significance thresholds during operational activity. Further Project traffic would not create or result in a CO “hotspot.” Therefore, sensitive receptors would not be exposed to substantial pollutant concentrations as the result of Project operations.

5.11 ODORS
The potential for the Project to generate objectionable odors has also been considered. Potential odor sources associated with the proposed Project may result from construction equipment exhaust and the application of asphalt and architectural coatings during construction activities.

Standard construction requirements would minimize odor impacts from construction. The construction odor emissions would be temporary, short-term, and intermittent in nature and would cease upon completion of the respective phase of construction and is thus considered less than significant. It is expected that Project-generated refuse would be stored in covered containers and removed at regular intervals. The proposed Project would also be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 402 to prevent occurrences of public nuisances. Therefore, odors associated with the proposed Project construction would be less than significant and no mitigation is required (46).

According to the SCAQMD, land uses generally associated with odor complaints include:
• Agricultural uses (livestock and farming)
• Wastewater treatment plants
• Food processing plants
• Chemical plants
• Composting operations
• Refineries
• Landfills
• Dairies
• Fiberglass molding facilities
The proposed Project does not include any uses identified by the SCAQMD as being associated with emitting objectionable odors. As the proposed Project operational activities do not include these sources of odors, potential odor impacts would be less than significant. 3507
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
73 5.12 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
As previously shown in Table 2-3, the CAAQS designate the SCAB as nonattainment for O3, PM10, and PM2.5 while the NAAQS designates the SCAB as nonattainment for O3 and PM2.5.

The SCAQMD has published a report on how to address cumulative impacts from air pollution:

White Paper on Potential Control Strategies to Address Cumulative ImpactsfromAir Pollution (47).

In this report the SCAQMD clearly states (Page D-3):
…the AQMD uses the same significance thresholds for project specific and cumulative impacts for all environmental topics analyzed in an Environmental Assessment or EIR. The only case where the significance thresholds for project specific and cumulative impacts differ is the Hazard Index (HI) significance threshold for TAC emissions. The project specific (project increment) significance threshold is HI > 1.0 while the cumulative (facility-wide) is HI > 3.0. It should be noted that the HI is only one of three TAC emission significance thresholds considered (when applicable) in a CEQA analysis. The other two are the maximum individual cancer risk (MICR) and the cancer burden, both of which use the same significance thresholds (MICR of 10 in 1 million and cancer burden of 0.5) for project specific and cumulative impacts.

Projects that exceed the project-specific significance thresholds are considered by the SCAQMD to be cumulatively considerable. This is the reason project-specific and cumulative significance thresholds are the same. Conversely, projects that do not exceed the project-specific thresholds are generally not considered to be cumulatively significant.

Per the above White Paper guidance, less-than-significant air quality impacts at the Project-level are not cumulatively significant. Conversely, significant air quality impacts at the Project-level are cumulatively significant.

The South Coast Air Basin encompassing the Project site is designated as non-attainment for ozone, PM10, and PM2.5 (VOC and NOX are both ozone precursors; NOX is a precursor to PM10/PM2.5). Project construction-source NOx emissions regional threshold exceedances; and operational-source VOC, NOX, PM10, and PM2.5 emissions regional threshold exceedances would result in a cumulatively considerable net increase in criteria pollutants (ozone and PM10/PM2.5) for which the Project region is non-attainment. These are cumulatively significant air quality impacts.
3508
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
74 This page intentionally left blank
3509
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
75 6 REFERENCES

1. State of California. 2020 CEQA California Environmental Quality Act. 2020.

2. South Coast Air Quality Management District. RULE 403. FUGITIVE DUST. [Online] https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule-book/rule-iv/rule-403.pdf?sfvrsn=4.

3. —. RULE 1113. Architectural Coatings. [Online] http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/rulebook/reg-xi/r1113.pdf.

4. Urban Crossroads, Inc. Rich Haven Specific Plan Traffic Analysis. 2022.

5. South Coast Air Quality Management District. Southern California Air Basins. [Online] https://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/onroad/porttruck/maps/scabc7map.pdf.

6. —. Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Planning. 2005.

7. St. Croix Sensory, Inc. The "Gray Line" Between Odor Nuisance and Health Effects. 2000.

8. California Air Resources Board. Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS). [Online] 2016. http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/aaqs2.pdf.

9. United State Environmental Protection Agency. Frequent Questions about General Conformity . EPA. [Online] https://www.epa.gov/general-conformity/frequent-questions-about-general-conformity#8.

10. South Coast Air Quality Management District. Annual Air Quality Monitoring Network Plan. [Online] July 2018. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/clean-air-plans/air-quality-monitoringnetwork-plan/annual-air-quality-monitoring-network-plan-v2.pdf?sfvrsn=2.

11. Air Resources Board. State and National Ambient Air Quality Standards. [Online] https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/barcu/regact/2021/sad20/appc.pdf.

12. District, South Coast Air Quality Management. Air Quality Data Tables. [Online] https://www.aqmd.gov/home/air-quality/air-quality-data-studies/historical-data-by-year.

13. South Coast Air Quality Management District. Air Quality Management Plan. 2012.

14. California Air Resources Board. The California Almanac of Emissions and Air Quality. 2013.

15. South Coast AQMD. South Coast Air Basin Ozone Trend. [Online] https://www.aqmd.gov/home/airquality/historical-air-quality-data/historic-ozone-air-quality-trends.

16. California Air Resources Board. iADAM: Air Quality Data Statistics. California Air Resources Board. [Online] https://arb.ca.gov/adam/topfour/topfour1.php.

17. Environmental Protection Agency. Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California; South Coast Serious Area Plan for the 2006 PM2.5. [Online] 2019. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/02/12/2019-01922/approval-and-promulgationof-implementation-plans-california-south-coast-serious-area-plan-for-the.

18. South Coast Air Quality Management District. Final 2016 Air Quality Management Plan. South Coast Air Quality Management District. [Online] March 2017. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/clean-air-plans/air-quality-management-plans/2016-air-quality-management-plan/final2016-aqmp/final2016aqmp.pdf.

19. Southern California Association of Governments. 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy. [Online] April 2016. http://scagrtpscs.net/Documents/2016/final/f2016RTPSCS.pdf.

20. South coast Air Quality Management District. CEQA Air Quality Handbook (1993). 1993. 3510
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
76 21. California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board. Nitrogen Dioxide- Overview. [Online] http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/caaqs/no2-1/no2-1.htm.

22. Ralph Propper, Patrick Wong, Son Bui, Jeff Austin, William Vance, Alvaro Alvarado, Bart Croes, and Dongmin Luo. Ambient and Emission Trends of Toxic Air Contaminants in California. American Chemical Society: Environmental Science & Technology. 2015.

23. Air Resources Board. ARB's Drayage Truck Regulatory Activities. [Online] http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/onroad/porttruck/porttruck.htm.

24. —. Truck and Bus Regulation. On-Road Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicles (In-Use) Regulation. [Online] http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/onrdiesel/onrdiesel.htm.

25. The Port of Los Angeles. Clean Truck Program. [Online] http://www.portoflosangeles.org/ctp/idx_ctp.asp.

26. South Coast Air Quality Management District. Transfer Funds, Appropriate Funding, Execute Purchase Orders, Execute Contrat and Authorize Release of RFQs for the Fifth Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study. South Coast Air Quality Management District. [Online] 2017. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/Agendas/Governing-Board/2017/2017-jul7- 009.pdf?sfvrsn=7.

27. —. Executive Summary. MATES V Final Report. [Online] 2021. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/planning/mates-v/mates-v-final-report-9-24-21.pdf?sfvrsn=6.

28. Environmental Protection Agency. National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). [Online] 1990. https://www.epa.gov/environmental-topics/air-topics.

29. —. Air Pollution and the Clean Air Act. [Online] http://www.epa.gov/air/caa/.

30. United States Environmental Protection Agency. 1990 Clean Air Act Amendment Summary: Title I. [Online] https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/1990-clean-air-act-amendment-summarytitle-i.

31. —. 1990 Clean Air Act Amendment Summary: Title II. [Online] https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-actoverview/1990-clean-air-act-amendment-summary-title-ii.

32. Air Resources Board. California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS). [Online] 2009. [Cited: April 16, 2018.] http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/caaqs/caaqs.htm.

33. The California Energy Commission. 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards . California Energy Commission. [Online] 2018.
https://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/2019standards/documents/2018_Title_24_2019_Building_Stand ards_FAQ.pdf.

34. Department of General Services. Building Standards Commission. CALGreen. [Online] https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/chapter/15778/.

35. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds. [Online] http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-airquality-significance-thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=2.

36. South Coast Air Quality Management District. Localized Significance Thresholds Methodology. s.l. :

South Coast Air Quality Managment District, 2003.

37. Lake Environmental. US EPA Models. Lake Environmental. [Online] http://www.weblakes.com/download/us_epa.html.
3511
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
77 38. South Coast Air Quality Management District. Fact Sheet for Applying CalEEMod to Localized Significance Thresholds. [Online] http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/ceqa/handbook/localized-significance-thresholds/caleemod-guidance.pdf.

39. California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). Appendix A: Calculation Details for CalEEMod. CalEEMod. [Online] October 2017. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/caleemod/02_appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6.

40. —. California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod). [Online] May 2022. www.caleemod.com.

41. Urban Crossroads, Inc. Nevada Street Warehouse Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Evaluation. 2022.

42. South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2003 Air Quality Management Plan. [Online] 2003. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/clean-air-plans/air-quality-management-plans/2003-airquality-management-plan/2003-aqmp-appendix-v.pdf.

43. —. 2003 Air Quality Management Plan. [Online] 2003. https://www.aqmd.gov/home/airquality/clean-air-plans/air-quality-mgt-plan/2003-aqmp.

44. —. Final 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). [Online] March 2017. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/clean-air-plans/air-quality-management-plans/2016-airquality-management-plan/final-2016-aqmp/final2016aqmp.pdf?sfvrsn=11.

45. —. CEQA Air Quality Handbook (1993). 1993.

46. —. RULE 402 NUISANCE. [Online] http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule-book/rule-iv/rule402.pdf.

47. Goss, Tracy A and Kroeger, Amy. White Paper on Potential Control Strategies to Address Cumulative Impacts from Air Pollution. [Online] South Coast Air Quality Management District, 2003. http://www.aqmd.gov/rules/ciwg/final_white_paper.pdf.
3512
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
78 This page intentionally left blank
3513
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
79 7 CERTIFICATIONS
The contents of this air study report represent an accurate depiction of the environmental impacts associated with the proposed Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment. The information contained in this air quality impact assessment report is based on the best available data at the time of preparation. If you have any questions, please contact me directly at [email protected].

Haseeb Qureshi
Principal
Urban Crossroads, Inc.
[email protected]

EDUCATION
Master of Science in Environmental Studies
California State University, Fullerton • May 2010
Bachelor of Arts in Environmental Analysis and Design
University of California, Irvine • June 2006

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
AEP – Association of Environmental Planners
AWMA – Air and Waste Management Association
ASTM – American Society for Testing and Materials

PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS
Planned Communities and Urban Infill – Urban Land Institute • June 2011 Indoor Air Quality and Industrial Hygiene – EMSL Analytical • April 2008 Principles of Ambient Air Monitoring – CARB • August 2007 AB2588 Regulatory Standards – Trinity Consultants • November 2006 Air Dispersion Modeling – Lakes Environmental • June 2006 3514
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
80 This page intentionally left blank
3515
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
APPENDIX 2.1:

STATE/FEDERAL ATTAINMENT STATUS OF CRITERIA POLLUTANTS
3516

APPENDIX C

MAPS AND TABLES OF AREA DESIGNATIONS FOR

STATE AND NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
3517
[This page intentionally left blank]
3518
C-1

APPENDIX C

MAPS AND TABLES OF AREA DESIGNATIONS FOR

STATE AND NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
This attachment fulfills the requirement of Health and Safety Code section 40718 for CARB to publish maps that identify areas where one or more violations of any State ambient air quality standard (State standard) or national ambient air quality standard (national standard) have been measured. The national standards are those promulgated under section 109 of the federal Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7409).

This attachment is divided into three parts. The first part comprises a table showing the levels, averaging times, and measurement methods for each of the State and national standards. This is followed by a section containing maps and tables showing the area designations for each pollutant for which there is a State standard in the California Code of Regulations, title 17, section 70200. The last section contains maps and tables showing the most current area designations for the national standards. 3519
C-2
Concentration 3 Method 4 Primary 3,5 Secondary 3,6 Method 7 1 Hour 0.09 ppm (180 µg/m3
) —
8 Hour 0.070 ppm (137 µg/m3) 0.070 ppm (137 µg/m3)
24 Hour 50 µg/m3 150 µg/m3
Annual Arithmetic
Mean 20 µg/m3 —
24 Hour — — 35 µg/m3 Same as Primary
Standard
Annual Arithmetic
Mean 12 µg/m3 Gravimetric or Beta Attenuation 12.0 µg/m3 15 µg/m3 1 Hour 20 ppm (23 mg/m3) 35 ppm (40 mg/m3) —
8 Hour 9.0 ppm (10 mg/m3) 9 ppm (10 mg/m3) —
8 Hour (Lake
Tahoe) 6 ppm (7 mg/m3) — —
1 Hour 0.18 ppm (339 µg/m3) 100 ppb (188 μg/m3) —
Annual Arithmetic
Mean 0.030 ppm (57 µg/m3
) 0.053 ppm (100 µg/m3) Same as Primary
Standard
1 Hour 0.25 ppm (655 µg/m3) 75 ppb (196 μg/m3) —
3 Hour — — 0.5 ppm (1300
µg/m3)
24 Hour 0.04 ppm (105 µg/m3) 0.14 ppm
(for certain areas)11 —
Annual Arithmetic
Mean — 0.030 ppm(for certain areas)11 —
30 Day Average 1.5 µg/m3 — —
Calendar Quarter — 1.5 µg/m3
(for certain areas)12
Rolling 3-Month
Average — 0.15 µg/m3
Visibility
Reducing
Particles14
8 Hour See footnote 14
Beta Attenuation and
Transmittance
through Filter Tape
Sulfates 24 Hour 25 µg/m3 Ion Chromatography
Hydrogen
Sulfide 1 Hour 0.03 ppm (42 µg/m3
) Ultraviolet
Fluorescence
Vinyl
Chloride12 24 Hour 0.01 ppm (26 µg/m3
) Gas
Chromatography
See footnotes on next page …
Lead12,13 Atomic Absorption
High Volume
Sampler and Atomic
Absorption Same as Primary
Standard
No
National
Standards
Nitrogen
Dioxide
(NO2 )10
Gas Phase
Chemiluminescence
Gas Phase
Chemiluminescence
Sulfur Dioxide
(SO2 )11
Ultraviolet
Fluorescence
Ultraviolet
Flourescence;
Spectrophotometry
(Pararosaniline
Method)
Fine
Particulate
Matter
(PM2.5)9
Inertial Separation
and Gravimetric
Analysis
Carbon
Monoxide
(CO)
Non-Dispersive
Infrared Photometry
(NDIR)
Non-Dispersive
Infrared Photometry
(NDIR)
Ozone (O3)8 Ultraviolet Photometry Same as Primary
Standard
Ultraviolet
Photometry
Respirable
Particulate
Matter (PM10)9
Gravimetric or Beta
Attenuation
Same as Primary
Standard
Inertial Separation
and Gravimetric
Analysis
Ambient Air Quality Standards
Pollutant Averaging
Time
California Standards 1 National Standards 2
(Updated 5/4/16)
3520
C-3

1. California standards for ozone, carbon monoxide (except 8-hour Lake Tahoe), sulfur dioxide (1- and 24-hour), nitrogen dioxide, and particulate matter (PM10, PM2.5, and visibility reducing particles), are values that are not to be exceeded. All others are not to be equaled or exceeded. California ambient air quality standards are listed in the Table of Standards in Section 70200 of Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations.

2. National standards (other than ozone, particulate matter, and those based on annual arithmetic mean) are not to be exceeded more than once a year. The ozone standard is attained when the fourth highest 8-hour concentration measured at each site in a year, averaged over three years, is equal to or less than the standard. For PM10, the 24-hour standard is attained when the expected number of days per calendar year with a 24-hour average concentration above 150 µg/m3 is equal to or less than one. For PM2.5, the 24-hour standard is attained when 98 percent of the daily concentrations, averaged over three years, are equal to or less than the standard. Contact the U.S. EPA for further clarification and current national policies.

3. Concentration expressed first in units in which it was promulgated. Equivalent units given in parentheses are based upon a reference temperature of 25°C and a reference pressure of 760 torr. Most measurements of air quality are to be corrected to a reference temperature of 25°C and a reference pressure of 760 torr; ppm in this table refers to ppm by volume, or micromoles of pollutant per mole of gas.

4. Any equivalent measurement method which can be shown to the satisfaction of the CARB to give equivalent results at or near the level of the air quality standard may be used.

5. National Primary Standards: The levels of air quality necessary, with an adequate margin of safety to protect the public health.

6. National Secondary Standards: The levels of air quality necessary to protect the public welfare from any known or anticipated adverse effects of a pollutant.

7. Reference method as described by the U.S. EPA. An “equivalent method” of measurement may be used but must have a “consistent relationship to the reference method” and must be approved by the U.S. EPA.

8. On October 1, 2015, the national 8-hour ozone primary and secondary standards were lowered from 0.075 to 0.070 ppm.

9. On December 14, 2012, the national annual PM2.5 primary standard was lowered from 15 μg/m3 to 12.0 μg/m3. The existing national 24-hour PM2.5 standards (primary and secondary) were retained at 35 μg/m3, as was the annual secondary standard of 15 μg/m3. The existing 24-hour PM10 standards (primary and secondary) of 150 μg/m3 also were retained. The form of the annual primary and secondary standards is the annual mean, averaged over 3 years.

10. To attain the 1-hour national standard, the 3-year average of the annual 98th percentile of the 1-hour daily maximum concentrations at each site must not exceed 100 ppb. Note that the national 1-hour standard is in units of parts per billion (ppb).

California standards are in units of parts per million (ppm). To directly compare the national 1-hour standard to the California standards the units can be converted from ppb to ppm. In this case, the national standard of 100 ppb is identical to 0.100 ppm.

11. On June 2, 2010, a new 1-hour SO2 standard was established and the existing 24-hour and annual primary standards were revoked. To attain the 1-hour national standard, the 3-year average of the annual 99th percentile of the 1-hour daily maximum concentrations at each site must not exceed 75 ppb. The 1971 SO2 national standards (24-hour and annual) remain in effect until one year after an area is designated for the 2010 standard, except that in areas designated nonattainment for the 1971 standards, the 1971 standards remain in effect until implementation plans to attain or maintain the 2010 standards are approved.

Note that the 1-hour national standard is in units of parts per billion (ppb). California standards are in units of parts per million (ppm). To directly compare the 1-hour national standard to the California standard the units can be converted to ppm. In this case, the national standard of 75 ppb is identical to 0.075 ppm.

12. The CARB has identified lead and vinyl chloride as 'toxic air contaminants' with no threshold level of exposure for adverse health effects determined. These actions allow for the implementation of control measures at levels below the ambient concentrations specified for these pollutants.

13. The national standard for lead was revised on October 15, 2008 to a rolling 3-month average. The 1978 lead standard (1.5 μg/m3 as a quarterly average) remains in effect until one year after an area is designated for the 2008 standard, except that in areas designated nonattainment for the 1978 standard, the 1978 standard remains in effect until implementation plans to attain or maintain the 2008 standard are approved.

14. In 1989, the CARB converted both the general statewide 10-mile visibility standard and the Lake Tahoe 30-mile visibility standard to instrumental equivalents, which are "extinction of 0.23 per kilometer" and "extinction of 0.07 per kilometer" for the statewide and Lake Tahoe Air Basin standards, respectively. 3521
C-4
[This page intentionally left blank]
3522
C-5
Area Designations for the State Ambient Air Quality Standards The following maps and tables show the area designations for each pollutant with a State standard set forth in the California Code of Regulations, title 17, section 60200.

Each area is identified as attainment, nonattainment, nonattainment-transitional, or unclassified for each pollutant, as shown below:

Attainment A
Nonattainment N
Nonattainment-Transitional NA-T
Unclassified U
In general, CARB designates areas by air basin for pollutants with a regional impact and by county for pollutants with a more local impact. However, when there are areas within an air basin or county with distinctly different air quality deriving from sources and conditions not affecting the entire air basin or county, CARB may designate a smaller area. Generally, when boundaries of the designated area differ from the air basin or county boundaries, the description of the specific area is referenced at the bottom of the summary table.
3523
C-6
FIGURE 1
3524
C-7
TABLE 1
California Ambient Air Quality Standards
Area Designations for Ozone (1)

N NA-T U A N NA-T U A

GREAT BASIN VALLEYS AIR BASIN NORTHEAST PLATEAU AIR BASIN X Alpine County X SACRAMENTO VALLEY AIR BASIN
Inyo County X Colusa and Glenn Counties X
Mono County X Sutter/Yuba Counties
LAKE COUNTY AIR BASIN X Sutter Buttes X
LAKE TAHOE AIR BASIN X Remainder of Sutter County X
MOJAVE DESERT AIR BASIN X Yuba County X
MOUNTAIN COUNTIES AIR BASIN Yolo/Solano Counties X
Amador County X Remainder of Air Basin X
Calaveras County X SALTON SEA AIR BASIN X
El Dorado County (portion) X SAN DIEGO AIR BASIN X
Mariposa County X SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA AIR BASIN X
Nevada County X SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR BASIN X
Placer County (portion) X SOUTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN Plumas County X San Luis Obispo County X
Sierra County X Santa Barbara County X
Tuolumne County X Ventura County X

NORTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN X

NORTH COAST AIR BASIN X
(1) AB 3048 (Olberg) and AB 2525 (Miller) signed into law in 1996, made changes to Health and Safety Code, section 40925.5. One of the changes allows nonattainment districts to become nonattainment-transitional for ozone by operation of law. 3525
C-8
FIGURE 2
3526
C-9
TABLE 2
California Ambient Air Quality Standards
Area Designation for Suspended Particulate Matter (PM10)

N U A N U A

GREAT BASIN VALLEYS AIR BASIN X NORTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X

LAKE COUNTY AIR BASIN X NORTH COAST AIR BASIN
LAKE TAHOE AIR BASIN X Del Norte, Sonoma (portion) and Trinity Counties X MOJAVE DESERT AIR BASIN X Remainder of Air Basin X

MOUNTAIN COUNTIES AIR BASIN NORTHEAST PLATEAU AIR BASIN Amador County X Siskiyou County X
Calaveras County X Remainder of Air Basin X
El Dorado County (portion) X SACRAMENTO VALLEY AIR BASIN Mariposa County Shasta County X
- Yosemite National Park X Remainder of Air Basin X
- Remainder of County X SALTON SEA AIR BASIN X
Nevada County X SAN DIEGO AIR BASIN X
Placer County (portion) X SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA AIR BASIN X Plumas County X SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR BASIN X
Sierra County X SOUTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X
Tuolumne County X SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN X
3527
C-10
FIGURE 3
3528
C-11
TABLE 3
California Ambient Air Quality Standards
Area Designations for Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5)

N U A N U A

GREAT BASIN VALLEYS AIR BASIN X SALTON SEA AIR BASIN
LAKE COUNTY AIR BASIN X Imperial County
LAKE TAHOE AIR BASIN X - City of Calexico (3) X
MOJAVE DESERT AIR BASIN Remainder of Air Basin X
San Bernardino County SAN DIEGO AIR BASIN X
- County portion of federal Southeast
Desert Modified AQMA for Ozone (1) X SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA AIR BASIN X

SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR BASIN X
Remainder of Air Basin X SOUTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN
MOUNTAIN COUNTIES AIR BASIN San Luis Obispo County X
Plumas County Santa Barbara County X
- Portola Valley (2) X Ventura County X
Remainder of Air Basin X SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN X

NORTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X

NORTH COAST AIR BASIN X

NORTHEAST PLATEAU AIR BASIN X

SACRAMENTO VALLEY AIR BASIN
Butte County X
Colusa County X
Glenn County X
Placer County (portion) X
Sacramento County X
Shasta County X
Sutter and Yuba Counties X
Remainder of Air Basin X
(1) California Code of Regulations, title 17, section 60200(b) (2) California Code of Regulations, title 17, section 60200(c) (3) California Code of Regulations, title 17, section 60200(a) 3529
C-12
FIGURE 4
3530
C-13
TABLE 4
California Ambient Air Quality Standards
Area Designation for Carbon Monoxide*

N NA-T U A N NA-T U A

GREAT BASIN VALLEYS AIR BASIN SACRAMENTO VALLEY AIR BASIN Alpine County X Butte County X
Inyo County X Colusa County X
Mono County X Glenn County X
LAKE COUNTY AIR BASIN X Placer County (portion) X
LAKE TAHOE AIR BASIN X Sacramento County X
MOJAVE DESERT AIR BASIN Shasta County X
Kern County (portion) X Solano County (portion) X
Los Angeles County (portion) X Sutter County X
Riverside County (portion) X Tehama County X
San Bernardino County (portion) X Yolo County X
MOUNTAIN COUNTIES AIR BASIN Yuba County X
Amador County X SALTON SEA AIR BASIN X
Calaveras County X SAN DIEGO AIR BASIN X
El Dorado County (portion) X SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA AIR BASIN X Mariposa County X SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR BASIN
Nevada County X Fresno County X
Placer County (portion) X Kern County (portion) X
Plumas County X Kings County X
Sierra County X Madera County X
Tuolumne County X Merced County X
NORTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN San Joaquin County X
Monterey County X Stanislaus County X
San Benito County X Tulare County X
Santa Cruz County X SOUTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X

NORTH COAST AIR BASIN SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN X
Del Norte County X
Humboldt County X
Mendocino County X
Sonoma County (portion) X
Trinity County X

NORTHEAST PLATEAU AIR BASIN X
* The area designated for carbon monoxide is a county or portion of a county 3531
C-14
FIGURE 5

3532
C-15
TABLE 5
California Ambient Air Quality Standards
Area Designation for Nitrogen Dioxide

N U A N U A

GREAT BASIN VALLEYS AIR BASIN X SACRAMENTO VALLEY AIR BASIN X

LAKE COUNTY AIR BASIN X SALTON SEA AIR BASIN X

LAKE TAHOE AIR BASIN X SAN DIEGO AIR BASIN X

MOJAVE DESERT AIR BASIN X SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA AIR BASIN X

MOUNTAIN COUNTIES AIR BASIN X SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR BASIN X

NORTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X SOUTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X

NORTH COAST AIR BASIN X SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN
NORTHEAST PLATEAU AIR BASIN X CA 60 Near-road Portion of San Bernardino, Riverside, and Los Angeles Counties X Remainder of Air Basin X
3533
C-16
FIGURE 6
3534
C-17
TABLE 6
California Ambient Air Quality Standards
Area Designation for Sulfur Dioxide*

N U/A N U/A

GREAT BASIN VALLEYS AIR BASIN X SACRAMENTO VALLEY AIR BASIN X

LAKE COUNTY AIR BASIN X SALTON SEA AIR BASIN X

LAKE TAHOE AIR BASIN X SAN DIEGO AIR BASIN X

MOJAVE DESERT AIR BASIN X SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA AIR BASIN X

MOUNTAIN COUNTIES AIR BASIN X SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR BASIN X

NORTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X SOUTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X

NORTH COAST AIR BASIN X SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN X

NORTHEAST PLATEAU AIR BASIN X
* The area designated for sulfur dioxide is a county or portion of a county 3535
C-18
FIGURE 7
3536
C-19
TABLE 7
California Ambient Air Quality Standards
Area Designation for Sulfates

N U A N U A

GREAT BASIN VALLEYS AIR BASIN X SACRAMENTO VALLEY AIR BASIN X

LAKE COUNTY AIR BASIN X SALTON SEA AIR BASIN X

LAKE TAHOE AIR BASIN X SAN DIEGO AIR BASIN X

MOJAVE DESERT AIR BASIN X SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA AIR BASIN X

MOUNTAIN COUNTIES AIR BASIN X SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR BASIN X

NORTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X SOUTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X

NORTH COAST AIR BASIN X SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN X

NORTHEAST PLATEAU AIR BASIN X
3537
C-20
FIGURE 8
3538
C-21
TABLE 8
California Ambient Air Quality Standards
Area Designations for Lead (particulate)*

N U A N U A

GREAT BASIN VALLEYS AIR BASIN X SALTON SEA AIR BASIN X

LAKE COUNTY AIR BASIN X SAN DIEGO AIR BASIN X

LAKE TAHOE AIR BASIN X SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA AIR BASIN X

MOJAVE DESERT AIR BASIN X SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR BASIN X

MOUNTAIN COUNTIES AIR BASIN X SOUTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X

NORTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN X

NORTH COAST AIR BASIN X

NORTHEAST PLATEAU AIR BASIN X

SACRAMENTO VALLEY AIR BASIN X
* The area designated for lead is a county or portion of a county. Since all areas in the State are in attainment for this standard, air basins are indicated here for simplicity. 3539
C-22
FIGURE 9
3540
C-23
TABLE 9
California Ambient Air Quality Standards
Area Designation for Hydrogen Sulfide*

N NA-T U A N NA-T U A

GREAT BASIN VALLEYS AIR BASIN NORTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X Alpine County X NORTH COAST AIR BASIN
Inyo County X Del Norte County X
Mono County X Humboldt County X
LAKE COUNTY AIR BASIN X Mendocino County X
LAKE TAHOE AIR BASIN X Sonoma County (portion)
MOJAVE DESERT AIR BASIN - Geyser Geothermal Area (2) X
Kern County (portion) X - Remainder of County X
Los Angeles County (portion) X Trinity County X
Riverside County (portion) X NORTHEAST PLATEAU AIR BASIN X San Bernardino County (portion) SACRAMENTO VALLEY AIR BASIN X - Searles Valley Planning Area (1) X SALTON SEA AIR BASIN X - Remainder of County X SAN DIEGO AIR BASIN X

MOUNTAIN COUNTIES AIR BASIN SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA AIR BASIN X Amador County SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR BASIN X
- City of Sutter Creek X SOUTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN
- Remainder of County X San Luis Obispo County X
Calaveras County X Santa Barbara County X
El Dorado County (portion) X Ventura County X
Mariposa County X SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN X
Nevada County X
Placer County (portion) X
Plumas County X
Sierra County X
Tuolumne County X
* The area designated for hydrogen sulfide is a county or portion of a county (1) 52 Federal Register 29384 (August 7, 1987)
(2) California Code of Regulations, title 17, section 60200(d) 3541
C-24
FIGURE 10
3542
C-25
TABLE 10
California Ambient Air Quality Standards
Area Designation for Visibility Reducing Particles

N NA-T U A N NA-T U A

GREAT BASIN VALLEYS AIR BASIN X SACRAMENTO VALLEY AIR BASIN X

LAKE COUNTY AIR BASIN X SALTON SEA AIR BASIN X

LAKE TAHOE AIR BASIN X SAN DIEGO AIR BASIN X

MOJAVE DESERT AIR BASIN X SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA AIR BASIN X

MOUNTAIN COUNTIES AIR BASIN X SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR BASIN X

NORTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X SOUTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X

NORTH COAST AIR BASIN X SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN X

NORTHEAST PLATEAU AIR BASIN X
3543
C-26
Area Designations for the National Ambient Air Quality Standards The following maps and tables show the area designations for each pollutant with a national ambient air quality standard. Additional information about the federal area designations is available on the U.S. EPA website:
https://www.epa.gov/green-book
Over the last several years, U.S. EPA has been reviewing the levels of the various national standards. The agency has already promulgated new standard levels for some pollutants and is considering revising the levels for others. Information about the status of these reviews is available on the U.S. EPA website:
https://www.epa.gov/criteria-air-pollutants
Designation Categories
Suspended Particulate Matter (PM10). The U.S. EPA uses three categories to designate areas with respect to PM10:
• Attainment
• Nonattainment
• Unclassifiable
Ozone, Fine Suspended Particulate Matter (PM2.5), Carbon Monoxide (CO), and Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2). The U.S. EPA uses two categories to designate areas with respect to these standards:
• Nonattainment
• Unclassifiable/Attainment
The national 1-hour ozone standard was revoked effective June 15, 2005, and the area designations map reflects the 2015 national 8-hour ozone standard of

0.070 ppm. Original designations were finalized on August 3, 2018.

On December 14, 2012, the U.S. EPA established a new national annual primary PM2.5 standard of 12.0 µg/m3. New area designations reflecting this revised standard became final in December 2014. The current designation map reflects the most recently revised (2012) annual average standard of 12.0 μg/m3 as well as the 24-hour standard of 35 μg/m3, revised in 2006.

On January 22, 2010, the U.S. EPA established a new national 1-hour NO2 standard of 100 parts per billion (ppb) and retained the annual average standard of 53 ppb.

Designations for the primary NO2 standard became effective on February 29, 2012. All areas of California meet this standard.

Sulfur Dioxide (SO2). The U.S. EPA uses three categories to designate areas with respect to the 24-hour and annual average sulfur dioxide standards. These designation categories are:
• Nonattainment,
• Unclassifiable, and
• Attainment/Unclassifiable.

On June 2, 2010, the U.S. EPA established a new primary 1-hour SO2 standard of 75 parts per billion (ppb). At the same time, U.S. EPA revoked the 24-hour and annual 3544
C-27
average standards. Area designations for the 1-hour SO2 standard were finalized on December 21, 2017 and are reflected in the area designations map.

Lead (particulate). The U.S. EPA promulgated a new rolling 3-month average lead standard in October 2008 of 0.15 μg/m3. Designations were made for this standard in November 2010.

Designation Areas
From time to time, the boundaries of the California air basins have been changed to facilitate the planning process. CARB generally initiates these changes, and they are not always reflected in the U.S. EPA’s area designations. For purposes of consistency, the maps in this attachment reflect area designation boundaries and nomenclature as promulgated by the U.S. EPA. In some cases, these may not be the same as those adopted by CARB. For example, the national area designations reflect the former Southeast Desert Air Basin. In accordance with Health and Safety Code section 39606.1, CARB redefined this area in 1996 to be the Mojave Desert Air Basin and Salton Sea Air Basin. The definitions and boundaries for all areas designated for the national standards can be found in Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Chapter I, Subchapter C, Part 81.305. They are available on the web at:
https://ecfr.io/Title-40/se40.20.81_1305
3545
C-28
FIGURE 11
3546
C-29
TABLE 11
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
Area Designations for 8-Hour Ozone*

N U/A N U/A

GREAT BASIN VALLEYS AIR BASIN X SACRAMENTO VALLEY AIR BASIN (cont.)
LAKE COUNTY AIR BASIN X Yolo County (2) X
LAKE TAHOE AIR BASIN X Yuba County X

MOUNTAIN COUNTIES AIR BASIN SAN DIEGO COUNTY X
Amador County X SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA AIR BASIN X
Calaveras County X SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR BASIN X
El Dorado County (portion) (2) X SOUTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN (1) Mariposa County X San Luis Obispo County
Nevada County - Eastern San Luis Obispo County X
- Western Nevada County X - Remainder of County X
- Remainder of County X Santa Barbara County X
Placer County (portion) (2) X Ventura County
Plumas County X - Area excluding Anacapa and San
Nicolas Islands X
Sierra County X - Channel Islands (1) X
Tuolumne County X SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN (1) X

NORTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X SOUTHEAST DESERT AIR BASIN NORTH COAST AIR BASIN X Kern County (portion) X
NORTHEAST PLATEAU AIR BASIN X - Indian Wells Valley X
SACRAMENTO VALLEY AIR BASIN Imperial County X
Butte County X Los Angeles County (portion) X
Colusa County X Riverside County (portion)
Glenn County X - Coachella Valley X
Sacramento Metro Area (2) X - Non-AQMA portion X
Shasta County X San Bernardino County
Sutter County - Western portion (AQMA) X
- Sutter Buttes X - Eastern portion (non-AQMA) X
- Southern portion of Sutter
County (2) X
- Remainder of Sutter County X
Tehama County
- Tuscan Buttes X
- Remainder of Tehama County X
* Definitions and references for all areas can be found in 40 CFR, Chapter I, Part 81.305.

NOTE: This map and table reflect the 2015 8-hour ozone standard of 0.070 ppm. (1) South Central Coast Air Basin Channel Islands:

Santa Barbara County includes Santa Cruz, San Miguel, Santa Rosa, and Santa Barbara Islands.

Ventura County includes Anacapa and San Nicolas Islands.

South Coast Air Basin:

Los Angeles County includes San Clemente and Santa Catalina Islands. (2) For this purpose, the Sacramento Metro Area comprises all of Sacramento and Yolo Counties, the Sacramento Valley Air Basin portion of Solano County, the southern portion of Sutter County, and the Sacramento Valley and Mountain Counties Air Basins portions of Placer and El Dorado counties.
3547
C-30
FIGURE 12
3548
C-31
TABLE 12
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
Area Designations for Suspended Particulate Matter (PM10)*

N U A N U A

GREAT BASIN VALLEYS AIR

BASIN SAN DIEGO COUNTY X
Alpine County X SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA AIR BASIN X
Inyo County SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR BASIN X
- Owens Valley Planning Area X SOUTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X - Coso Junction X SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN X
- Remainder of County X SOUTHEAST DESERT AIR BASIN
Mono County Eastern Kern County
- Mammoth Lake Planning Area X - Indian Wells Valley X
- Mono Lake Basin X - Portion within San Joaquin Valley Planning Area X
- Remainder of County X - Remainder of County X
LAKE COUNTY AIR BASIN X Imperial County
LAKE TAHOE AIR BASIN X - Imperial Valley Planning Area X MOUNTAIN COUNTIES AIR BASIN - Remainder of County X
Placer County (portion) (2) X Los Angeles County (portion) X Remainder of Air Basin X Riverside County (portion)

NORTH CENTRAL COAST AIR
BASIN X - Coachella Valley (3) X
NORTH COAST AIR BASIN X - Non-AQMA portion X
NORTHEAST PLATEAU AIR BASIN X San Bernardino County
SACRAMENTO VALLEY AIR BASIN - Trona X
Butte County X - Remainder of County X
Colusa County X
Glenn County X
Placer County (portion) (2) X
Sacramento County (1) X
Shasta County X
Solano County (portion) X
Sutter County X
Tehama County X
Yolo County X
Yuba County X
* Definitions and references for all areas can be found in 40 CFR, Chapter I, Part 81.305. (1) Air quality in Sacramento County meets the national PM10 standards. The request for redesignation to attainment was approved by U.S. EPA in September 2013.
(2) U.S. EPA designation puts the Sacramento Valley Air Basin portion of Placer County in the Mountain Counties Air Basin.
(3) Air quality in Coachella Valley meets the national PM10 standards. A request for redesignation to attainment has been submitted to U.S. EPA.
3549
C-32
FIGURE 13
3550
C-33
TABLE 13
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
Area Designations for Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5)*

N U/A N U/A

GREAT BASIN VALLEYS AIR BASIN X SAN DIEGO COUNTY X
LAKE COUNTY AIR BASIN X SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA AIR BASIN (2) X

LAKE TAHOE AIR BASIN X SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR BASIN X

MOUNTAIN COUNTIES AIR BASIN SOUTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X Plumas County SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN (3) X
- Portola Valley Portion of Plumas X SOUTHEAST DESERT AIR BASIN - Remainder of Plumas County X Imperial County (portion) (4) X Remainder of Air Basin X Remainder of Air Basin X

NORTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X

NORTH COAST AIR BASIN X

NORTHEAST PLATEAU AIR BASIN X

SACRAMENTO VALLEY AIR BASIN
Sacramento Metro Area (1) X
Sutter County X
Yuba County (portion) X
Remainder of Air Basin X
* Definitions and references for all areas can be found in 40 CFR, Chapter I, Part 81.305. This map reflects the 2006 24- hour PM2.5 standard as well as the 1997 and 2012 PM2.5 annual standards. (1) For this purpose, Sacramento Metro Area comprises all of Sacramento and portions of El Dorado, Placer, Solano, and Yolo Counties. Air quality in this area meets the national PM2.5 standards. A Determination of Attainment for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard was made by U.S. EPA in June 2017. (2) Air quality in this area meets the national PM2.5 standards. A Determination of Attainment for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard was made by U.S. EPA in June 2017.
(3) Those lands of the Santa Rosa Band of Cahulla Mission Indians in Riverside County are designated Unclassifiable/Attainment.
(4) That portion of Imperial County encompassing the urban and surrounding areas of Brawley, Calexico, El Centro, Heber, Holtville, Imperial, Seeley, and Westmorland. Air quality in this area meets the national PM2.5 standards. A Determination of Attainment for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard was made by U.S. EPA in June 2017. 3551
C-34
FIGURE 14
3552
C-35
TABLE 14
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
Area Designations for Carbon Monoxide*

N U/A N U/A

GREAT BASIN VALLEYS AIR BASIN X SACRAMENTO VALLEY AIR BASIN X

LAKE COUNTY AIR BASIN X SAN DIEGO COUNTY X

LAKE TAHOE AIR BASIN X SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA AIR BASIN X

MOUNTAIN COUNTIES AIR BASIN X SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR BASIN X

NORTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X SOUTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X

NORTH COAST AIR BASIN X SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN X

NORTHEAST PLATEAU AIR BASIN X SOUTHEAST DESERT AIR BASIN X * Definitions and references for all areas can be found in 40 CFR, Chapter I, Part 81.305. 3553
C-36
FIGURE 15
3554
C-37
TABLE 15
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
Area Designations for Nitrogen Dioxide*

N U/A N U/A

GREAT BASIN VALLEYS AIR BASIN X SACRAMENTO VALLEY AIR BASIN X

LAKE COUNTY AIR BASIN X SAN DIEGO COUNTY X

LAKE TAHOE AIR BASIN X SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA AIR BASIN X

MOUNTAIN COUNTIES AIR BASIN X SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR BASIN X

NORTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X SOUTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X

NORTH COAST AIR BASIN X SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN X

NORTHEAST PLATEAU AIR BASIN X SOUTHEAST DESERT AIR BASIN X * Definitions and references for all areas can be found in 40 CFR, Chapter I, Part 81.305. 3555
C-38
FIGURE 16
3556
C-39
TABLE 16
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
Area Designations for Sulfur Dioxide*

N U/A N U/A

GREAT BASIN VALLEYS AIR BASIN X SOUTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN LAKE COUNTY AIR BASIN X San Luis Obispo County X
LAKE TAHOE AIR BASIN X Santa Barbara County X
MOUNTAIN COUNTIES AIR BASIN X Ventura County X
NORTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X Channel Islands (1) X

NORTH COAST AIR BASIN X SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN X

NORTHEAST PLATEAU AIR BASIN X SOUTHEAST DESERT AIR BASIN SACRAMENTO VALLEY AIR BASIN X Imperial County X
SAN DIEGO COUNTY X Remainder of Air Basin X

SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA AIR BASIN X

SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR BASIN
Fresno County X
Kern County (portion) X
Kings County X
Madera County X
Merced County X
San Joaquin County X
Stanislaus County X
Tulare County X
* Definitions and references for all areas can be found in 40 CFR, Chapter I, Part 81.305.

NOTE: This map and table reflect the 2010 1-hour SO2 standard of 75 ppb. (1) South Central Coast Air Basin Channel Islands:

Santa Barbara County includes Santa Cruz, San Miguel, Santa Rosa, and Santa Barbara Islands.

Ventura County includes Anacapa and San Nicolas Islands.

Note that the San Clemente and Santa Catalina Islands are considered part of Los Angeles County, and therefore, are included as part of the South Coast Air Basin.
3557
C-40
FIGURE 17
3558
C-41
TABLE 17
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
Area Designations for Lead (particulate)

N U/A N U/A

GREAT BASIN VALLEYS AIR BASIN X SAN DIEGO COUNTY X

LAKE COUNTY AIR BASIN X SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA AIR BASIN X

LAKE TAHOE AIR BASIN X SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR BASIN X

MOUNTAIN COUNTIES AIR BASIN X SOUTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X

NORTH CENTRAL COAST AIR BASIN X SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN
NORTH COAST AIR BASIN X Los Angeles County (portion) (1) X NORTHEAST PLATEAU AIR BASIN X Remainder of Air Basin X

SACRAMENTO VALLEY AIR BASIN X SOUTHEAST DESERT AIR BASIN X (1) Portion of County in Air Basin, not including Channel Islands 3559
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
This page intentionally left blank
3560
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
APPENDIX 5.1:

CALEEMOD CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS – WITHOUT MITIGATION 3561
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 1 / 32
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Site Preparation (2023) - Unmitigated

3.3. Grading (2023) - Unmitigated

3.5. Building Construction (2023) - Unmitigated

3.7. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated

3.9. Paving (2024) - Unmitigated

3.11. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated
3562
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 2 / 32

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
3563
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 3 / 32

5.7. Construction Paving

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
3564
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 4 / 32

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures

8. User Changes to Default Data
3565
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 5 / 32

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name 14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Unmitigated Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.80
Precipitation (days) 20.8
Location 34.01192837529811, -117.57074736445445
County San Bernardino-South Coast
City Ontario
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 5261
EDFZ 10
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Southern California Gas

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Office Park 317 1000sqft 7.27 316,725 0.00 — — —
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
454 1000sqft 10.4 454,244 0.00 — — —
3566
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 6 / 32
Unrefrigerated 1,996 1000sqft 45.8 1,996,180 531,432 — — — Warehouse-No Rail
Condo/Townhouse 3,289 Dwelling Unit 106 3,486,340 1,045,440 — 10,887 — Single Family
Housing
822 Dwelling Unit 72.5 1,602,900 631,620 — 2,721 —
Strip Mall 7.50 1000sqft 0.17 7,500 4,356 — — —
Gasoline/Service
Station

48.0 Pump 0.16 6,776 0.00 — — —
Regional Shopping
Center
162 1000sqft 3.72 162,137 109,336 — — —
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

32.4 1000sqft 0.74 32,427 0.00 — — —
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru

21.6 1000sqft 0.50 21,618 0.00 — — —
Parking Lot 58.0 Acre 58.0 0.00 0.00 — — —
City Park 1.30 Acre 1.30 0.00 56,628 56,628 — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 36.9 286 147 484 0.25 7.66 65.7 68.8 7.05 15.6 18.5 — 96,362 96,362 4.59 4.79 314 98,220 3567
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 7 / 32
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Unmit. 35.6 285 147 387 0.25 7.66 65.7 68.8 7.05 15.6 18.5 — 90,733 90,733 4.69 4.79 8.15 92,287 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 23.5 186 95.8 269 0.16 4.44 45.5 47.2 4.09 10.8 12.3 — 62,486 62,486 3.23 3.38 95.4 63,670 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 4.28 33.9 17.5 49.1 0.03 0.81 8.31 8.61 0.75 1.97 2.25 — 10,345 10,345 0.53 0.56 15.8 10,541

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 18.4 15.1 147 122 0.25 7.66 19.0 26.6 7.05 8.58 15.6 — 29,743 29,743 1.59 1.48 27.8 30,251 2024 36.9 286 105 484 0.24 3.14 65.7 68.8 2.90 15.6 18.5 — 96,362 96,362 4.59 4.79 314 98,220 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 28.7 24.4 147 323 0.25 7.66 55.0 57.0 7.05 13.1 15.6 — 76,040 76,040 4.18 4.36 7.50 77,450 2024 35.6 285 109 387 0.24 3.14 65.7 68.8 2.90 15.6 18.5 — 90,733 90,733 4.69 4.79 8.15 92,287 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 12.9 10.5 95.8 94.3 0.16 4.44 12.4 16.8 4.09 4.37 8.45 — 22,333 22,333 1.18 1.09 14.3 22,702 2024 23.5 186 66.6 269 0.15 1.68 45.5 47.2 1.56 10.8 12.3 — 62,486 62,486 3.23 3.38 95.4 63,670 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 2.35 1.92 17.5 17.2 0.03 0.81 2.26 3.07 0.75 0.80 1.54 — 3,698 3,698 0.20 0.18 2.38 3,759 3568 14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 8 / 32
2024 4.28 33.9 12.1 49.1 0.03 0.31 8.31 8.61 0.28 1.97 2.25 — 10,345 10,345 0.53 0.56 15.8 10,541

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Site Preparation (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

17.5 14.7 141 114 0.15 7.59 — 7.59 6.98 — 6.98 — 16,589 16,589 0.67 0.13 — 16,646 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 17.0 17.0 — 8.06 8.06 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
3569
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 9 / 32
Off-Road 4.07 3.42 32.8 26.5 0.04 1.77 — 1.77 1.63 — 1.63 — 3,863 3,863 0.16 0.03 — 3,877 Equipment
Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 3.96 3.96 — 1.88 1.88 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.74 0.62 5.99 4.84 0.01 0.32 — 0.32 0.30 — 0.30 — 640 640 0.03 0.01 — 642 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.72 0.72 — 0.34 0.34 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.32 0.29 0.28 4.86 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 771 771 0.03 0.03 3.31 783 Vendor 0.54 0.14 5.72 3.08 0.03 0.07 0.27 0.34 0.07 0.10 0.17 — 4,817 4,817 0.40 0.71 13.3 5,052 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.30 0.27 0.32 3.65 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 707 707 0.03 0.03 0.09 715 Vendor 0.53 0.13 5.94 3.13 0.03 0.07 0.27 0.34 0.07 0.10 0.17 — 4,819 4,819 0.40 0.71 0.35 5,042 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.08 0.90 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 167 167 0.01 0.01 0.33 169 3570
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 10 / 32
Vendor 0.13 0.03 1.39 0.72 0.01 0.02 0.06 0.08 0.02 0.02 0.04 — 1,122 1,122 0.09 0.17 1.34 1,175 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.16 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 27.6 27.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 28.0 Vendor 0.02 0.01 0.25 0.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 186 186 0.02 0.03 0.22 195 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.3. Grading (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

15.0 12.6 123 98.0 0.19 5.87 — 5.87 5.40 — 5.40 — 20,146 20,146 0.82 0.16 — 20,215 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 8.01 8.01 — 2.94 2.94 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

15.0 12.6 123 98.0 0.19 5.87 — 5.87 5.40 — 5.40 — 20,146 20,146 0.82 0.16 — 20,215 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 8.01 8.01 — 2.94 2.94 — — — — — — —
3571
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 11 / 32
Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

6.32 5.31 51.8 41.4 0.08 2.48 — 2.48 2.28 — 2.28 — 8,500 8,500 0.34 0.07 — 8,529 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 3.38 3.38 — 1.24 1.24 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.15 0.97 9.46 7.55 0.01 0.45 — 0.45 0.42 — 0.42 — 1,407 1,407 0.06 0.01 — 1,412 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.62 0.62 — 0.23 0.23 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.36 0.33 0.32 5.55 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 881 881 0.04 0.03 3.78 895 Vendor 0.98 0.24 10.3 5.58 0.06 0.12 0.49 0.62 0.12 0.19 0.31 — 8,715 8,715 0.73 1.29 24.1 9,140 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.34 0.31 0.37 4.18 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 808 808 0.04 0.03 0.10 818 Vendor 0.97 0.23 10.7 5.66 0.06 0.12 0.49 0.62 0.12 0.19 0.31 — 8,719 8,719 0.73 1.29 0.63 9,122 3572
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 12 / 32
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.14 0.13 0.16 1.86 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 346 346 0.02 0.01 0.69 350 Vendor 0.41 0.10 4.56 2.37 0.03 0.05 0.21 0.26 0.05 0.08 0.13 — 3,678 3,678 0.31 0.54 4.40 3,851 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.34 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 57.2 57.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 58.0 Vendor 0.07 0.02 0.83 0.43 < 0.005 0.01 0.04 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.02 — 609 609 0.05 0.09 0.73 638 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.5. Building Construction (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

4.86 4.07 38.4 42.9 0.08 1.79 — 1.79 1.65 — 1.65 — 7,890 7,890 0.32 0.06 — 7,917 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.29 0.25 2.33 2.60 < 0.005 0.11 — 0.11 0.10 — 0.10 — 479 479 0.02 < 0.005 — 480 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3573
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 13 / 32
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.05 0.05 0.43 0.47 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 79.2 79.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 79.5 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 22.0 19.9 23.9 270 0.00 0.00 3.16 3.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 52,139 52,139 2.52 1.92 6.35 52,781 Vendor 1.77 0.42 19.7 10.4 0.11 0.23 0.91 1.14 0.23 0.34 0.57 — 16,011 16,011 1.34 2.37 1.15 16,752 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 1.33 1.20 1.45 17.3 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 3,208 3,208 0.15 0.12 6.41 3,253 Vendor 0.11 0.03 1.21 0.63 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.07 0.01 0.02 0.03 — 971 971 0.08 0.14 1.16 1,017 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.24 0.22 0.27 3.16 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 531 531 0.03 0.02 1.06 539 Vendor 0.02 < 0.005 0.22 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 161 161 0.01 0.02 0.19 168 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.7. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
3574
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 14 / 32
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Off-Road
Equipment

4.64 3.89 36.5 42.7 0.08 1.61 — 1.61 1.48 — 1.48 — 7,891 7,891 0.32 0.06 — 7,918 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

4.64 3.89 36.5 42.7 0.08 1.61 — 1.61 1.48 — 1.48 — 7,891 7,891 0.32 0.06 — 7,918 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.33 2.78 26.2 30.6 0.05 1.16 — 1.16 1.06 — 1.06 — 5,652 5,652 0.23 0.05 — 5,671 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.61 0.51 4.77 5.58 0.01 0.21 — 0.21 0.19 — 0.19 — 936 936 0.04 0.01 — 939 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 22.2 20.3 18.8 328 0.00 0.00 3.16 3.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 55,768 55,768 2.35 1.92 223 56,622 Vendor 1.68 0.45 18.2 9.74 0.11 0.23 0.91 1.14 0.23 0.34 0.57 — 15,833 15,833 1.22 2.36 44.2 16,611 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3575
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 15 / 32
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Worker 21.1 19.1 22.1 248 0.00 0.00 3.16 3.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 51,115 51,115 2.43 1.92 5.78 51,755 Vendor 1.65 0.42 18.9 9.88 0.11 0.23 0.91 1.14 0.23 0.34 0.57 — 15,840 15,840 1.22 2.36 1.14 16,575 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 15.0 13.5 15.8 186 0.00 0.00 2.26 2.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 37,129 37,129 1.74 1.38 68.9 37,652 Vendor 1.19 0.31 13.6 7.04 0.08 0.16 0.65 0.81 0.16 0.24 0.41 — 11,342 11,342 0.87 1.69 13.6 11,882 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.73 2.47 2.89 34.0 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 6,147 6,147 0.29 0.23 11.4 6,234 Vendor 0.22 0.06 2.49 1.28 0.01 0.03 0.12 0.15 0.03 0.04 0.07 — 1,878 1,878 0.14 0.28 2.25 1,967 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.9. Paving (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.04 2.55 23.4 30.1 0.04 1.17 — 1.17 1.07 — 1.07 — 4,535 4,535 0.18 0.04 — 4,550 Paving — 1.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3576
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 16 / 32
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Off-Road
Equipment

3.04 2.55 23.4 30.1 0.04 1.17 — 1.17 1.07 — 1.07 — 4,535 4,535 0.18 0.04 — 4,550 Paving — 1.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.72 0.61 5.59 7.17 0.01 0.28 — 0.28 0.26 — 0.26 — 1,081 1,081 0.04 0.01 — 1,085 Paving — 0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.13 0.11 1.02 1.31 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 179 179 0.01 < 0.005 — 180 Paving — 0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.26 0.24 0.22 3.81 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 648 648 0.03 0.02 2.59 658 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.25 0.22 0.26 2.88 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 594 594 0.03 0.02 0.07 601 3577
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 17 / 32
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 144 144 0.01 0.01 0.27 146 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 23.8 23.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 24.1 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.11. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.66 0.55 3.63 4.59 0.01 0.13 — 0.13 0.12 — 0.12 — 534 534 0.02 < 0.005 — 536 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 253 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.66 0.55 3.63 4.59 0.01 0.13 — 0.13 0.12 — 0.12 — 534 534 0.02 < 0.005 — 536 3578
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 18 / 32
Architect
Coatings
— 253 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.43 0.36 2.38 3.00 < 0.005 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 350 350 0.01 < 0.005 — 351 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 165 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.08 0.07 0.43 0.55 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.01 — 0.01 — 57.9 57.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 58.1 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 30.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 4.44 4.06 3.76 65.5 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 11,154 11,154 0.47 0.38 44.6 11,324 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 4.22 3.82 4.42 49.5 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 10,223 10,223 0.49 0.38 1.16 10,351 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3579
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 19 / 32
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.74 2.48 2.90 34.1 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 6,789 6,789 0.32 0.25 12.6 6,884 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.50 0.45 0.53 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 1,124 1,124 0.05 0.04 2.09 1,140 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetatio
n
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
3580
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 20 / 32

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
3581
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 21 / 32
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/1/2023 4/30/2023 5.00 85.0 — Grading Grading 5/1/2023 11/30/2023 5.00 154 —
3582
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 22 / 32
Building Construction Building Construction 12/1/2023 12/31/2024 5.00 283 — Paving Paving 9/1/2024 12/31/2024 5.00 87.0 —
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 2/1/2024 12/31/2024 5.00 239 —

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 9.00 8.00 367 0.40 Grading Excavators Diesel Average 6.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Grading Graders Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 148 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 367 0.40 Grading Scrapers Diesel Average 6.00 8.00 423 0.48
Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 9.00 8.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 14.0 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 9.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Welders Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 46.0 0.45 Paving Pavers Diesel Average 6.00 8.00 81.0 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Average 6.00 8.00 89.0 0.36 Paving Rollers Diesel Average 6.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 37.0 0.48 Site Preparation Crawler Tractors Diesel Average 12.0 8.00 87.0 0.43 Grading Crawler Tractors Diesel Average 6.00 8.00 87.0 0.43

5.3. Construction Vehicles
3583
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 23 / 32

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Site Preparation — — — —
Site Preparation Worker 52.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor 152 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDT
Grading — — — —
Grading Worker 60.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor 275 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction — — — —
Building Construction Worker 3,874 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 505 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
Paving — — — —
Paving Worker 45.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT
Architectural Coating — — — —
Architectural Coating Worker 775 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT 3584
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 24 / 32

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.5. Architectural Coatings
Phase Name Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
Architectural Coating 10,305,711 3,435,237 4,496,411 1,498,804 151,589

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (cy) Material Exported (cy) Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (sq. ft.) Acres Paved (acres) Site Preparation — — 1,700 0.00 —
Grading — — 3,080 0.00 —
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 67.1

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Control Strategies Applied Frequency (per day) PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction Water Exposed Area 3 74% 74%

5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
Office Park 0.00 0%
Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.00 0%
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.00 0%
3585
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 25 / 32
Condo/Townhouse — 0%
Single Family Housing 9.06 0%
Strip Mall 0.00 0%
Gasoline/Service Station 0.00 0%
Regional Shopping Center 0.00 0%
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 0.00 0%
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 0.00 0%
Parking Lot 58.0 100%
City Park 0.00 0%

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Year kWh per Year CO2 CH4 N2O
2023 0.00 532 0.03 < 0.005
2024 0.00 532 0.03 < 0.005

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres
3586
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 26 / 32

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040–2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.

Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 20.0 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 3.95 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise 0.00 meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 0.00 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ¾ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 50 meters (m) by 50 m, or about 164 feet (ft) by 164 ft.

Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 2 0 0 N/A
3587
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 27 / 32
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A
Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality 0 0 0 N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 2 1 1 3
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 1 1 2
Wildfire 1 1 1 2
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality 1 1 1 2
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
3588
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 28 / 32

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 84.6
AQ-PM 95.6
AQ-DPM 57.0
Drinking Water 93.3
Lead Risk Housing 7.89
Pesticides 64.8
Toxic Releases 71.4
Traffic 14.2
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 7.71
Groundwater 81.4
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 81.9
Impaired Water Bodies 43.8
Solid Waste 35.7
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 58.6
Cardio-vascular 79.3
Low Birth Weights 68.1
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 51.5
Housing 70.8
3589
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 29 / 32
Linguistic 15.6
Poverty 40.3
Unemployment 40.6

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 50.9816502
Employed 66.62389324
Median HI 72.65494675
Education —
Bachelor's or higher 43.46208136
High school enrollment 100
Preschool enrollment 17.18208649
Transportation —
Auto Access 93.63531374
Active commuting 23.14897985
Social —
2-parent households 66.79070961
Voting 49.36481458
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability 65.76414731
Park access 55.29321186
Retail density 20.00513281
Supermarket access 52.71397408
Tree canopy 13.73027076
3590
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 30 / 32
Housing—
Homeownership 73.48902862
Housing habitability 38.94520724
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 67.22699859 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 48.14577185
Uncrowded housing 46.38778391
Health Outcomes—
Insured adults 44.20633902
Arthritis 84.5
Asthma ER Admissions 52.8
High Blood Pressure 89.6
Cancer (excluding skin) 77.2
Asthma 51.9
Coronary Heart Disease 88.8
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 81.8
Diagnosed Diabetes 68.9
Life Expectancy at Birth 43.6
Cognitively Disabled 92.5
Physically Disabled 86.7
Heart Attack ER Admissions 10.7
Mental Health Not Good 52.8
Chronic Kidney Disease 85.5
Obesity 50.5
Pedestrian Injuries 19.6
Physical Health Not Good 65.0
Stroke 84.7
Health Risk Behaviors—
3591
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 31 / 32
Binge Drinking 15.4
Current Smoker 54.4
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 62.4
Climate Change Exposures —
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
Children 51.6
Elderly 87.4
English Speaking 59.0
Foreign-born 27.3
Outdoor Workers 53.0
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 70.3
Traffic Density 21.2
Traffic Access 23.0
Other Indices —
Hardship 44.7
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 55.1

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 76.0 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 53.0 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) Yes Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) No Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No 3592
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 32 / 32
a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use Acreage adjusted based on site plan
Construction: Construction Phases Schedule adjusted based on data from the Project team.

Construction: Off-Road Equipment Equipment based on data from the Project team.

Construction: Dust From Material Movement Assumes 20 acres will be graded per day Construction: Trips and VMT Vendor Trips adjusted based on CalEEMod defaults for Building Construction and number of days for Demolition, Site Preparation, Grading, and Building Construction.

Construction: Architectural Coatings Project will use super-compliant coatings 3593
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 1 / 36
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated

3.3. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated

3.5. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated

3.7. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated

3.9. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated

3.11. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated
3594
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 2 / 36

3.13. Paving (2026) - Unmitigated

3.15. Architectural Coating (2026) - Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation
3595
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 3 / 36

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details
3596
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 4 / 36

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures

8. User Changes to Default Data
3597
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 5 / 36

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name 14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Unmitigated Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.80
Precipitation (days) 20.8
Location 34.01284450351814, -117.57158813842331
County San Bernardino-South Coast
City Ontario
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 5261
EDFZ 10
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Southern California Gas

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Single Family
Housing
603 Dwelling Unit 81.3 1,175,850 708,721 — 1,996 —
Condo/Townhouse 2,000 Dwelling Unit 55.9 2,120,000 242,283 — 6,620 — City Park 27.0 Acre 27.0 0.00 1,176,120 1,176,120 — —
3598
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 6 / 36
Regional Shopping
Center
526 1000sqft 12.1 525,990 342,382 — — —
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
105 1000sqft 2.42 105,198 0.00 — — —
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru

70.1 1000sqft 1.61 70,132 0.00 — — —
Gasoline/Service
Station

48.0 Pump 0.16 6,776 0.00 — — —
Parking Lot 54.5 Acre 54.5 0.00 0.00 — — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 19.3 199 130 248 0.21 6.78 32.3 34.7 6.24 8.35 14.6 — 51,709 51,709 2.35 2.23 127 52,561 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 18.6 198 116 207 0.21 5.36 32.3 34.7 4.94 7.65 9.84 — 49,051 49,051 2.00 2.28 3.30 49,771 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 11.3 86.2 80.6 130 0.12 3.89 21.0 22.3 3.58 4.98 6.94 — 31,329 31,329 1.21 1.55 36.6 31,850 3599
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 7 / 36
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
(Max)
Unmit. 2.05 15.7 14.7 23.6 0.02 0.71 3.84 4.06 0.65 0.91 1.27 — 5,187 5,187 0.20 0.26 6.06 5,273

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 16.5 13.8 130 111 0.21 6.78 18.1 24.9 6.24 8.35 14.6 — 23,736 23,736 1.06 0.60 11.1 23,953 2025 14.7 12.6 101 195 0.21 4.59 26.7 28.2 4.23 6.34 7.73 — 41,436 41,436 1.96 2.03 118 42,209 2026 19.3 199 73.2 248 0.17 2.38 32.3 34.7 2.20 7.65 9.84 — 51,709 51,709 2.35 2.23 127 52,561 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 14.7 12.2 116 99.6 0.21 5.36 9.53 14.9 4.94 3.33 8.26 — 23,665 23,665 1.07 0.60 0.29 23,871 2025 14.1 12.0 101 158 0.21 4.59 26.7 28.2 4.23 6.34 7.73 — 39,212 39,212 2.00 2.03 3.07 39,870 2026 18.6 198 74.5 207 0.17 2.38 32.3 34.7 2.20 7.65 9.84 — 49,051 49,051 1.46 2.28 3.30 49,771 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 10.2 8.51 80.6 69.5 0.12 3.89 7.96 11.9 3.58 3.36 6.94 — 13,571 13,571 0.61 0.33 2.63 13,686 2025 9.86 8.28 48.6 101 0.11 1.80 14.9 16.7 1.66 3.78 5.44 — 24,512 24,512 1.21 1.11 25.6 24,900 2026 11.3 86.2 42.2 130 0.10 1.22 21.0 22.3 1.13 4.98 6.11 — 31,329 31,329 0.92 1.55 36.6 31,850 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 1.86 1.55 14.7 12.7 0.02 0.71 1.45 2.16 0.65 0.61 1.27 — 2,247 2,247 0.10 0.05 0.44 2,266 2025 1.80 1.51 8.87 18.4 0.02 0.33 2.72 3.04 0.30 0.69 0.99 — 4,058 4,058 0.20 0.18 4.24 4,122 2026 2.05 15.7 7.70 23.6 0.02 0.22 3.84 4.06 0.21 0.91 1.12 — 5,187 5,187 0.15 0.26 6.06 5,273 3600
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 8 / 36

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

9.35 7.85 74.7 65.2 0.10 3.18 — 3.18 2.93 — 2.93 — 10,276 10,276 0.42 0.08 — 10,311 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.30 0.30 — 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.67 1.40 13.3 11.6 0.02 0.57 — 0.57 0.52 — 0.52 — 1,830 1,830 0.07 0.01 — 1,836 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.05 0.05 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.30 0.26 2.43 2.12 < 0.005 0.10 — 0.10 0.10 — 0.10 — 303 303 0.01 < 0.005 — 304 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.01 0.01 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
3601
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 9 / 36
Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.25 0.22 0.26 2.88 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 594 594 0.03 0.02 0.07 601 Vendor 0.11 0.03 1.24 0.65 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.07 0.01 0.02 0.04 — 1,035 1,035 0.08 0.15 0.07 1,083 Hauling 0.05 0.01 0.48 0.26 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 374 374 0.04 0.06 0.02 393 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 107 107 0.01 < 0.005 0.20 109 Vendor 0.02 < 0.005 0.22 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 184 184 0.01 0.03 0.22 193 Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.09 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 66.6 66.6 0.01 0.01 0.06 70.0 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 17.8 17.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 18.0 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 30.5 30.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 32.0 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.0 11.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 11.6

3.3. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
3602
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 10 / 36
Off-Road 16.0 13.5 128 106 0.15 6.75 — 6.75 6.21 — 6.21 — 16,588 16,588 0.67 0.13 — 16,644 Equipment
Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 17.0 17.0 — 8.06 8.06 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

4.84 4.06 38.4 31.9 0.05 2.04 — 2.04 1.87 — 1.87 — 4,999 4,999 0.20 0.04 — 5,016 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 5.12 5.12 — 2.43 2.43 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.88 0.74 7.01 5.83 0.01 0.37 — 0.37 0.34 — 0.34 — 828 828 0.03 0.01 — 830 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.93 0.93 — 0.44 0.44 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.30 0.27 0.25 4.44 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 756 756 0.03 0.03 3.02 767 3603
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 11 / 36
Vendor 0.18 0.05 1.98 1.06 0.01 0.02 0.10 0.12 0.02 0.04 0.06 — 1,724 1,724 0.13 0.26 4.81 1,809 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.09 0.08 0.09 1.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 212 212 0.01 0.01 0.39 215 Vendor 0.05 0.01 0.62 0.32 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.02 — 520 520 0.04 0.08 0.62 544 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.19 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 35.1 35.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 35.5 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.11 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 86.1 86.1 0.01 0.01 0.10 90.1 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.5. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

14.1 11.8 113 94.1 0.19 5.32 — 5.32 4.90 — 4.90 — 20,145 20,145 0.82 0.16 — 20,214 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 8.01 8.01 — 2.94 2.94 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3604
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 12 / 36
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Off-Road
Equipment

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.36 2.82 26.9 22.5 0.04 1.27 — 1.27 1.17 — 1.17 — 4,810 4,810 0.20 0.04 — 4,826 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 1.91 1.91 — 0.70 0.70 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.61 0.52 4.91 4.10 0.01 0.23 — 0.23 0.21 — 0.21 — 796 796 0.03 0.01 — 799 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.35 0.35 — 0.13 0.13 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.34 0.31 0.29 5.08 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 864 864 0.04 0.03 3.45 877 3605
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 13 / 36
Vendor 0.29 0.08 3.13 1.68 0.02 0.04 0.16 0.20 0.04 0.06 0.10 — 2,728 2,728 0.21 0.41 7.61 2,862 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.33 0.30 0.34 3.84 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 792 792 0.04 0.03 0.09 802 Vendor 0.28 0.07 3.26 1.70 0.02 0.04 0.16 0.20 0.04 0.06 0.10 — 2,729 2,729 0.21 0.41 0.20 2,856 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.08 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 192 192 0.01 0.01 0.36 194 Vendor 0.07 0.02 0.78 0.40 < 0.005 0.01 0.04 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.02 — 651 651 0.05 0.10 0.78 682 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.18 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 31.7 31.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 32.2 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.14 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 108 108 0.01 0.02 0.13 113 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.7. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

12.7 10.7 97.8 88.3 0.19 4.55 — 4.55 4.19 — 4.19 — 20,146 20,146 0.82 0.16 — 20,215 3606
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 14 / 36
Dust — — — — — — 8.01 8.01 — 2.94 2.94 — — — — — — —
From
Material
Movement
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

12.7 10.7 97.8 88.3 0.19 4.55 — 4.55 4.19 — 4.19 — 20,146 20,146 0.82 0.16 — 20,215 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 8.01 8.01 — 2.94 2.94 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.99 2.51 23.0 20.7 0.04 1.07 — 1.07 0.98 — 0.98 — 4,731 4,731 0.19 0.04 — 4,747 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 1.88 1.88 — 0.69 0.69 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.55 0.46 4.19 3.78 0.01 0.20 — 0.20 0.18 — 0.18 — 783 783 0.03 0.01 — 786 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.34 0.34 — 0.13 0.13 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3607
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 15 / 36
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.30 0.28 0.26 4.67 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 845 845 0.04 0.03 3.14 858 Vendor 0.27 0.08 2.98 1.61 0.02 0.04 0.16 0.20 0.04 0.06 0.10 — 2,684 2,684 0.21 0.41 7.55 2,818 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.29 0.26 0.29 3.52 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 775 775 0.04 0.03 0.08 785 Vendor 0.26 0.07 3.11 1.62 0.02 0.04 0.16 0.20 0.04 0.06 0.10 — 2,685 2,685 0.21 0.41 0.20 2,812 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.87 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 185 185 0.01 0.01 0.32 187 Vendor 0.06 0.02 0.74 0.38 < 0.005 0.01 0.04 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.02 — 630 630 0.05 0.10 0.77 661 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.16 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 30.6 30.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 31.0 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.13 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 104 104 0.01 0.02 0.13 109 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.9. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
3608
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 16 / 36
Off-Road
Equipment

4.35 3.64 33.9 42.4 0.08 1.40 — 1.40 1.29 — 1.29 — 7,891 7,891 0.32 0.06 — 7,918 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

4.35 3.64 33.9 42.4 0.08 1.40 — 1.40 1.29 — 1.29 — 7,891 7,891 0.32 0.06 — 7,918 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.09 1.75 16.3 20.3 0.04 0.67 — 0.67 0.62 — 0.62 — 3,783 3,783 0.15 0.03 — 3,796 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.38 0.32 2.97 3.71 0.01 0.12 — 0.12 0.11 — 0.11 — 626 626 0.03 0.01 — 629 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 9.66 8.72 8.36 148 0.00 0.00 1.55 1.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 26,789 26,789 1.11 0.94 99.4 27,197 Vendor 0.67 0.19 7.50 4.06 0.05 0.10 0.39 0.49 0.10 0.15 0.25 — 6,756 6,756 0.52 1.02 19.0 7,093 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 9.12 8.17 9.22 112 0.00 0.00 1.55 1.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 24,561 24,561 1.15 0.94 2.57 24,873 3609
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 17 / 36
Vendor 0.66 0.18 7.84 4.07 0.05 0.10 0.39 0.49 0.10 0.15 0.25 — 6,760 6,760 0.52 1.02 0.49 7,078 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 4.33 3.86 4.79 56.5 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 11,942 11,942 0.55 0.45 20.6 12,111 Vendor 0.32 0.09 3.78 1.93 0.02 0.05 0.19 0.24 0.05 0.07 0.12 — 3,240 3,240 0.25 0.49 3.95 3,396 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.79 0.70 0.87 10.3 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 1,977 1,977 0.09 0.07 3.41 2,005 Vendor 0.06 0.02 0.69 0.35 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.02 — 536 536 0.04 0.08 0.65 562 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.11. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

4.14 3.47 32.0 42.2 0.08 1.23 — 1.23 1.13 — 1.13 — 7,890 7,890 0.32 0.06 — 7,917 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

4.14 3.47 32.0 42.2 0.08 1.23 — 1.23 1.13 — 1.13 — 7,890 7,890 0.32 0.06 — 7,917 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3610
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 18 / 36
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.96 2.48 22.9 30.1 0.05 0.88 — 0.88 0.81 — 0.81 — 5,635 5,635 0.23 0.05 — 5,655 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.54 0.45 4.17 5.50 0.01 0.16 — 0.16 0.15 — 0.15 — 933 933 0.04 0.01 — 936 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 9.12 8.22 7.50 137 0.00 0.00 1.55 1.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 26,242 26,242 1.11 0.90 89.8 26,628 Vendor 0.67 0.14 7.18 3.89 0.05 0.10 0.39 0.49 0.10 0.15 0.25 — 6,643 6,643 0.47 1.02 17.5 6,977 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 8.61 7.67 8.36 103 0.00 0.00 1.55 1.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 24,066 24,066 0.38 0.94 2.33 24,359 Vendor 0.66 0.13 7.47 3.95 0.05 0.10 0.39 0.49 0.10 0.15 0.25 — 6,647 6,647 0.47 1.02 0.45 6,964 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 6.15 5.48 6.53 77.7 0.00 0.00 1.11 1.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 17,431 17,431 0.27 0.67 27.7 17,666 Vendor 0.47 0.09 5.37 2.80 0.04 0.07 0.28 0.35 0.07 0.11 0.18 — 4,746 4,746 0.34 0.73 5.38 4,978 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 1.12 1.00 1.19 14.2 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 2,886 2,886 0.04 0.11 4.59 2,925 3611
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 19 / 36
Vendor 0.09 0.02 0.98 0.51 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.06 0.01 0.02 0.03 — 786 786 0.06 0.12 0.89 824 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.13. Paving (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.72 2.28 21.4 29.8 0.04 0.96 — 0.96 0.88 — 0.88 — 4,532 4,532 0.18 0.04 — 4,547 Paving — 1.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.72 2.28 21.4 29.8 0.04 0.96 — 0.96 0.88 — 0.88 — 4,532 4,532 0.18 0.04 — 4,547 Paving — 1.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.65 0.55 5.15 7.19 0.01 0.23 — 0.23 0.21 — 0.21 — 1,093 1,093 0.04 0.01 — 1,096 Paving — 0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
3612
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 20 / 36
Off-Road
Equipment

0.12 0.10 0.94 1.31 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 181 181 0.01 < 0.005 — 182 Paving — 0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.22 0.19 0.18 3.24 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 621 621 0.03 0.02 2.13 630 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.20 0.18 0.20 2.45 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 570 570 0.01 0.02 0.06 577 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.04 0.05 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 139 139 < 0.005 0.01 0.22 141 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 23.1 23.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 23.4 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.15. Architectural Coating (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) 3613 14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 21 / 36
Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.58 0.48 3.43 4.53 0.01 0.09 — 0.09 0.09 — 0.09 — 534 534 0.02 < 0.005 — 536 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 181 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.58 0.48 3.43 4.53 0.01 0.09 — 0.09 0.09 — 0.09 — 534 534 0.02 < 0.005 — 536 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 181 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.25 0.20 1.45 1.91 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 225 225 0.01 < 0.005 — 226 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 76.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.04 0.04 0.26 0.35 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 37.3 37.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 37.4 3614
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 22 / 36
Architect
Coatings
— 13.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 1.82 1.64 1.50 27.4 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 5,248 5,248 0.22 0.18 18.0 5,326 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 1.72 1.53 1.67 20.7 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 4,813 4,813 0.08 0.19 0.47 4,872 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.73 0.65 0.77 9.18 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 2,059 2,059 0.03 0.08 3.27 2,087 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.13 0.12 0.14 1.68 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 341 341 0.01 0.01 0.54 346 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type
3615
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 23 / 36

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
3617
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 25 / 36
Sequest — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Demolition Demolition 1/1/2024 3/31/2024 5.00 65.0 —
Site Preparation Site Preparation 4/1/2024 8/31/2024 5.00 110 — Grading Grading 9/1/2024 4/30/2025 5.00 173 —
Building Construction Building Construction 5/1/2025 12/31/2026 5.00 436 — Paving Paving 9/1/2026 12/31/2026 5.00 88.0 —
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 6/1/2026 12/31/2026 5.00 154 —

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial
Saws
Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 33.0 0.73
Demolition Excavators Diesel Average 9.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 6.00 8.00 367 0.40 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 9.00 8.00 367 0.40 3618
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 26 / 36
Grading Excavators Diesel Average 6.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Grading Graders Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 148 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 367 0.40 Grading Scrapers Diesel Average 6.00 8.00 423 0.48
Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 9.00 8.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 14.0 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 9.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Welders Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 46.0 0.45 Paving Pavers Diesel Average 6.00 8.00 81.0 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Average 6.00 8.00 89.0 0.36 Paving Rollers Diesel Average 6.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 37.0 0.48 Site Preparation Crawler Tractors Diesel Average 12.0 8.00 87.0 0.43 Grading Crawler Tractors Diesel Average 6.00 8.00 87.0 0.43

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Demolition — — — —
Demolition Worker 45.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Demolition Vendor 33.0 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Demolition Hauling 5.31 20.0 HHDT
Demolition Onsite truck — — HHDT
Site Preparation — — — —
Site Preparation Worker 52.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 3619
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 27 / 36
Site Preparation Vendor 55.0 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDT
Grading — — — —
Grading Worker 60.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor 87.0 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction — — — —
Building Construction Worker 1,901 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 219 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
Paving — — — —
Paving Worker 45.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT
Architectural Coating — — — —
Architectural Coating Worker 380 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user. 3620 14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 28 / 36

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (cy) Material Exported (cy) Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (Building Square Footage)
Acres Paved (acres)
Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,000 —
Site Preparation — — 2,200 0.00 —
Grading — — 3,460 0.00 —
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 61.1

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Control Strategies Applied Frequency (per day) PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction Water Exposed Area 3 74% 74%
Water Demolished Area 2 36% 36%

5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
Single Family Housing 6.64 0%
Condo/Townhouse — 0%
City Park 0.00 0%
Regional Shopping Center 0.00 0%
3621
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 29 / 36
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 0.00 0%
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 0.00 0%
Gasoline/Service Station 0.00 0%
Parking Lot 54.5 100%

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Year kWh per Year CO2 CH4 N2O
2024 0.00 532 0.03 < 0.005
2025 0.00 532 0.03 < 0.005
2026 0.00 532 0.03 < 0.005

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
3622
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 30 / 36
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 2 0 0 N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A
Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A 3623
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 31 / 36
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality 0 0 0 N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. 3624 14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 32 / 36
Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators—
AQ-Ozone 84.6
AQ-PM 95.6
AQ-DPM 57.0
Drinking Water 93.3
Lead Risk Housing 7.89
Pesticides 64.8
Toxic Releases 71.4
Traffic 14.2
Effect Indicators—
CleanUp Sites 7.71
Groundwater 81.4
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 81.9
Impaired Water Bodies 43.8
Solid Waste 35.7
Sensitive Population—
Asthma 58.6
Cardio-vascular 79.3
Low Birth Weights 68.1
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators—
Education 51.5
Housing 70.8
Linguistic 15.6
Poverty 40.3
Unemployment 40.6
3625
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 33 / 36

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 50.9816502
Employed 66.62389324
Median HI 72.65494675
Education —
Bachelor's or higher 43.46208136
High school enrollment 100
Preschool enrollment 17.18208649
Transportation —
Auto Access 93.63531374
Active commuting 23.14897985
Social —
2-parent households 66.79070961
Voting 49.36481458
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability 65.76414731
Park access 55.29321186
Retail density 20.00513281
Supermarket access 52.71397408
Tree canopy 13.73027076
Housing —
Homeownership 73.48902862
Housing habitability 38.94520724
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 67.22699859 3626
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 34 / 36
Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 48.14577185
Uncrowded housing 46.38778391
Health Outcomes—
Insured adults 44.20633902
Arthritis 84.5
Asthma ER Admissions 52.8
High Blood Pressure 89.6
Cancer (excluding skin) 77.2
Asthma 51.9
Coronary Heart Disease 88.8
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 81.8
Diagnosed Diabetes 68.9
Life Expectancy at Birth 43.6
Cognitively Disabled 92.5
Physically Disabled 86.7
Heart Attack ER Admissions 10.7
Mental Health Not Good 52.8
Chronic Kidney Disease 85.5
Obesity 50.5
Pedestrian Injuries 19.6
Physical Health Not Good 65.0
Stroke 84.7
Health Risk Behaviors—
Binge Drinking 15.4
Current Smoker 54.4
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 62.4
Climate Change Exposures—
3627
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 35 / 36
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
Children 51.6
Elderly 87.4
English Speaking 59.0
Foreign-born 27.3
Outdoor Workers 53.0
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 70.3
Traffic Density 21.2
Traffic Access 23.0
Other Indices —
Hardship 44.7
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 55.1

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 76.0 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 53.0 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) Yes Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) No Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
3628
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Unmitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 36 / 36
No Health & Equity Measures selected.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use Acreage adjusted based on site area
Construction: Construction Phases Construction schedule based on info from the Project team Construction: Off-Road Equipment Construction equipment based on data from the Project team.

Construction: Architectural Coatings Project will use super-compliant coatings. 3629
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
This page intentionally left blank
3630
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
APPENDIX 5.2:

CALEEMOD CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS – WITH MITIGATION 3631
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 1 / 32
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Site Preparation (2023) - Unmitigated

3.3. Grading (2023) - Unmitigated

3.5. Building Construction (2023) - Unmitigated

3.7. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated

3.9. Paving (2024) - Unmitigated

3.11. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated
3632
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 2 / 32

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
3633
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 3 / 32

5.7. Construction Paving

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
3634
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 4 / 32

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures

8. User Changes to Default Data
3635
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 5 / 32

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name 14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Mitigated Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.80
Precipitation (days) 20.8
Location 34.01192837529811, -117.57074736445445
County San Bernardino-South Coast
City Ontario
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 5261
EDFZ 10
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Southern California Gas

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Office Park 317 1000sqft 7.27 316,725 0.00 — — —
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
454 1000sqft 10.4 454,244 0.00 — — —
3636
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 6 / 32
Unrefrigerated 1,996 1000sqft 45.8 1,996,180 531,432 — — — Warehouse-No Rail
Condo/Townhouse 3,289 Dwelling Unit 106 3,486,340 1,045,440 — 10,887 — Single Family
Housing
822 Dwelling Unit 72.5 1,602,900 631,620 — 2,721 —
Strip Mall 7.50 1000sqft 0.17 7,500 4,356 — — —
Gasoline/Service
Station

48.0 Pump 0.16 6,776 0.00 — — —
Regional Shopping
Center
162 1000sqft 3.72 162,137 109,336 — — —
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

32.4 1000sqft 0.74 32,427 0.00 — — —
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru

21.6 1000sqft 0.50 21,618 0.00 — — —
Parking Lot 58.0 Acre 58.0 0.00 0.00 — — —
City Park 1.30 Acre 1.30 0.00 56,628 56,628 — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 30.8 70.1 97.7 491 0.25 0.98 65.7 66.6 0.94 15.6 16.5 — 96,362 96,362 4.59 4.79 314 98,220 3637
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 7 / 32
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Unmit. 29.4 68.6 102 394 0.25 0.98 65.7 66.6 0.94 15.6 16.5 — 90,733 90,733 4.69 4.79 8.15 92,287 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 20.2 45.0 62.5 273 0.16 0.57 45.5 46.1 0.55 10.8 11.3 — 62,486 62,486 3.23 3.38 95.4 63,670 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 3.69 8.21 11.4 49.8 0.03 0.10 8.31 8.41 0.10 1.97 2.07 — 10,345 10,345 0.53 0.56 15.8 10,541

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 3.80 3.03 70.4 120 0.25 0.68 19.0 19.4 0.66 8.58 8.96 — 29,743 29,743 1.59 1.48 27.8 30,251 2024 30.8 70.1 97.7 491 0.24 0.98 65.7 66.6 0.94 15.6 16.5 — 96,362 96,362 4.59 4.79 314 98,220 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 25.2 21.7 74.5 329 0.25 0.68 55.0 55.6 0.66 13.1 13.6 — 76,040 76,040 4.18 4.36 7.50 77,450 2024 29.4 68.6 102 394 0.24 0.98 65.7 66.6 0.94 15.6 16.5 — 90,733 90,733 4.69 4.79 8.15 92,287 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 3.78 3.14 46.9 93.5 0.16 0.41 12.4 12.8 0.40 4.37 4.77 — 22,333 22,333 1.18 1.09 14.3 22,702 2024 20.2 45.0 62.5 273 0.15 0.57 45.5 46.1 0.55 10.8 11.3 — 62,486 62,486 3.23 3.38 95.4 63,670 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 0.69 0.57 8.56 17.1 0.03 0.07 2.26 2.34 0.07 0.80 0.87 — 3,698 3,698 0.20 0.18 2.38 3,759 3638 14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 8 / 32
2024 3.69 8.21 11.4 49.8 0.03 0.10 8.31 8.41 0.10 1.97 2.07 — 10,345 10,345 0.53 0.56 15.8 10,541

3. Construction Emissions Details

2.03 2.03 47.1 89.9 0.15 0.31 — 0.31 0.31 — 0.31 — 16,589 16,589 0.67 0.13 — 16,646 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 17.0 17.0 — 8.06 8.06 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
3639
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 9 / 32
Off-Road 0.47 0.47 11.0 20.9 0.04 0.07 — 0.07 0.07 — 0.07 — 3,863 3,863 0.16 0.03 — 3,877 Equipment
Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 3.96 3.96 — 1.88 1.88 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.09 0.09 2.00 3.82 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 640 640 0.03 0.01 — 642 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.72 0.72 — 0.34 0.34 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.32 0.29 0.28 4.86 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 771 771 0.03 0.03 3.31 783 Vendor 0.54 0.14 5.72 3.08 0.03 0.07 0.27 0.34 0.07 0.10 0.17 — 4,817 4,817 0.40 0.71 13.3 5,052 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.30 0.27 0.32 3.65 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 707 707 0.03 0.03 0.09 715 Vendor 0.53 0.13 5.94 3.13 0.03 0.07 0.27 0.34 0.07 0.10 0.17 — 4,819 4,819 0.40 0.71 0.35 5,042 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.08 0.90 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 167 167 0.01 0.01 0.33 169 3640
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 10 / 32
Vendor 0.13 0.03 1.39 0.72 0.01 0.02 0.06 0.08 0.02 0.02 0.04 — 1,122 1,122 0.09 0.17 1.34 1,175 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.16 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 27.6 27.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 28.0 Vendor 0.02 0.01 0.25 0.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 186 186 0.02 0.03 0.22 195 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

2.46 2.46 59.7 109 0.19 0.55 — 0.55 0.54 — 0.54 — 20,146 20,146 0.82 0.16 — 20,215 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 8.01 8.01 — 2.94 2.94 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.46 2.46 59.7 109 0.19 0.55 — 0.55 0.54 — 0.54 — 20,146 20,146 0.82 0.16 — 20,215 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 8.01 8.01 — 2.94 2.94 — — — — — — —
3641
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 11 / 32
Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.04 1.04 25.2 45.8 0.08 0.23 — 0.23 0.23 — 0.23 — 8,500 8,500 0.34 0.07 — 8,529 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 3.38 3.38 — 1.24 1.24 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.19 0.19 4.60 8.36 0.01 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 1,407 1,407 0.06 0.01 — 1,412 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.62 0.62 — 0.23 0.23 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.36 0.33 0.32 5.55 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 881 881 0.04 0.03 3.78 895 Vendor 0.98 0.24 10.3 5.58 0.06 0.12 0.49 0.62 0.12 0.19 0.31 — 8,715 8,715 0.73 1.29 24.1 9,140 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.34 0.31 0.37 4.18 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 808 808 0.04 0.03 0.10 818 Vendor 0.97 0.23 10.7 5.66 0.06 0.12 0.49 0.62 0.12 0.19 0.31 — 8,719 8,719 0.73 1.29 0.63 9,122 3642
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 12 / 32
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.14 0.13 0.16 1.86 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 346 346 0.02 0.01 0.69 350 Vendor 0.41 0.10 4.56 2.37 0.03 0.05 0.21 0.26 0.05 0.08 0.13 — 3,678 3,678 0.31 0.54 4.40 3,851 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.34 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 57.2 57.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 58.0 Vendor 0.07 0.02 0.83 0.43 < 0.005 0.01 0.04 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.02 — 609 609 0.05 0.09 0.73 638 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1.40 1.34 30.9 48.6 0.08 0.38 — 0.38 0.36 — 0.36 — 7,890 7,890 0.32 0.06 — 7,917 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.09 0.08 1.87 2.95 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 479 479 0.02 < 0.005 — 480 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3643
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 13 / 32
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.01 0.34 0.54 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 79.2 79.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 79.5 Onsite
truck

3.7. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
3644
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 14 / 32
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Off-Road
Equipment

1.40 1.34 30.8 48.6 0.08 0.37 — 0.37 0.35 — 0.35 — 7,891 7,891 0.32 0.06 — 7,918 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.40 1.34 30.8 48.6 0.08 0.37 — 0.37 0.35 — 0.35 — 7,891 7,891 0.32 0.06 — 7,918 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.00 0.96 22.1 34.8 0.05 0.27 — 0.27 0.25 — 0.25 — 5,652 5,652 0.23 0.05 — 5,671 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.18 0.17 4.03 6.35 0.01 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 936 936 0.04 0.01 — 939 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 22.2 20.3 18.8 328 0.00 0.00 3.16 3.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 55,768 55,768 2.35 1.92 223 56,622 Vendor 1.68 0.45 18.2 9.74 0.11 0.23 0.91 1.14 0.23 0.34 0.57 — 15,833 15,833 1.22 2.36 44.2 16,611 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3645
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 15 / 32
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Worker 21.1 19.1 22.1 248 0.00 0.00 3.16 3.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 51,115 51,115 2.43 1.92 5.78 51,755 Vendor 1.65 0.42 18.9 9.88 0.11 0.23 0.91 1.14 0.23 0.34 0.57 — 15,840 15,840 1.22 2.36 1.14 16,575 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 15.0 13.5 15.8 186 0.00 0.00 2.26 2.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 37,129 37,129 1.74 1.38 68.9 37,652 Vendor 1.19 0.31 13.6 7.04 0.08 0.16 0.65 0.81 0.16 0.24 0.41 — 11,342 11,342 0.87 1.69 13.6 11,882 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.73 2.47 2.89 34.0 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 6,147 6,147 0.29 0.23 11.4 6,234 Vendor 0.22 0.06 2.49 1.28 0.01 0.03 0.12 0.15 0.03 0.04 0.07 — 1,878 1,878 0.14 0.28 2.25 1,967 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.69 0.69 21.6 31.8 0.04 0.26 — 0.26 0.24 — 0.24 — 4,535 4,535 0.18 0.04 — 4,550 Paving — 1.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3646
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 16 / 32
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Off-Road
Equipment

0.69 0.69 21.6 31.8 0.04 0.26 — 0.26 0.24 — 0.24 — 4,535 4,535 0.18 0.04 — 4,550 Paving — 1.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.16 0.16 5.15 7.58 0.01 0.06 — 0.06 0.06 — 0.06 — 1,081 1,081 0.04 0.01 — 1,085 Paving — 0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.03 0.94 1.38 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 179 179 0.01 < 0.005 — 180 Paving — 0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.26 0.24 0.22 3.81 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 648 648 0.03 0.02 2.59 658 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.25 0.22 0.26 2.88 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 594 594 0.03 0.02 0.07 601 3647
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 17 / 32
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 144 144 0.01 0.01 0.27 146 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 23.8 23.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 24.1 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.08 0.08 4.28 3.85 0.01 0.12 — 0.12 0.11 — 0.11 — 534 534 0.02 < 0.005 — 536 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 41.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.08 0.08 4.28 3.85 0.01 0.12 — 0.12 0.11 — 0.11 — 534 534 0.02 < 0.005 — 536 3648
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 18 / 32
Architect
Coatings
— 41.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.06 0.06 2.80 2.52 < 0.005 0.08 — 0.08 0.07 — 0.07 — 350 350 0.01 < 0.005 — 351 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 27.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.51 0.46 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 57.9 57.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 58.1 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 4.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 4.44 4.06 3.76 65.5 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 11,154 11,154 0.47 0.38 44.6 11,324 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 4.22 3.82 4.42 49.5 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 10,223 10,223 0.49 0.38 1.16 10,351 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3649
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 19 / 32
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.74 2.48 2.90 34.1 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 6,789 6,789 0.32 0.25 12.6 6,884 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.50 0.45 0.53 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 1,124 1,124 0.05 0.04 2.09 1,140 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetatio
n
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
3650
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 20 / 32

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
3651
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 21 / 32
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/1/2023 4/30/2023 5.00 85.0 — Grading Grading 5/1/2023 11/30/2023 5.00 154 —
3652
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 22 / 32
Building Construction Building Construction 12/1/2023 12/31/2024 5.00 283 — Paving Paving 9/1/2024 12/31/2024 5.00 87.0 —
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 2/1/2024 12/31/2024 5.00 239 —

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 9.00 8.00 367 0.40 Grading Excavators Diesel Tier 4 Interim 6.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Grading Graders Diesel Tier 4 Interim 3.00 8.00 148 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 3.00 8.00 367 0.40 Grading Scrapers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 6.00 8.00 423 0.48 Building Construction Cranes Diesel Tier 4 Interim 3.00 8.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Tier 4 Interim 9.00 8.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Tier 4 Interim 3.00 8.00 14.0 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Tier 4 Interim 9.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Welders Diesel Tier 4 Interim 3.00 8.00 46.0 0.45 Paving Pavers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 6.00 8.00 81.0 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Tier 4 Interim 6.00 8.00 89.0 0.36 Paving Rollers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 6.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Tier 4 Interim 3.00 8.00 37.0 0.48 Site Preparation Crawler Tractors Diesel Tier 4 Interim 12.0 8.00 87.0 0.43 Grading Crawler Tractors Diesel Tier 4 Interim 6.00 8.00 87.0 0.43

5.3. Construction Vehicles
3653
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 23 / 32

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Site Preparation — — — —
Site Preparation Worker 52.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor 152 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDT
Grading — — — —
Grading Worker 60.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor 275 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction — — — —
Building Construction Worker 3,874 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 505 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
Paving — — — —
Paving Worker 45.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT
Architectural Coating — — — —
Architectural Coating Worker 775 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT 3654
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 24 / 32

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Control Strategies Applied Frequency (per day) PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction Water Exposed Area 3 74% 74%

5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
Office Park 0.00 0%
Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.00 0%
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.00 0%
3655
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 25 / 32
Condo/Townhouse — 0%
Single Family Housing 9.06 0%
Strip Mall 0.00 0%
Gasoline/Service Station 0.00 0%
Regional Shopping Center 0.00 0%
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 0.00 0%
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 0.00 0%
Parking Lot 58.0 100%
City Park 0.00 0%

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Year kWh per Year CO2 CH4 N2O
2023 0.00 532 0.03 < 0.005
2024 0.00 532 0.03 < 0.005

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres
3656
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 26 / 32

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 2 0 0 N/A
3657
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 27 / 32
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A
Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality 0 0 0 N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
3658
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 28 / 32

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 84.6
AQ-PM 95.6
AQ-DPM 57.0
Drinking Water 93.3
Lead Risk Housing 7.89
Pesticides 64.8
Toxic Releases 71.4
Traffic 14.2
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 7.71
Groundwater 81.4
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 81.9
Impaired Water Bodies 43.8
Solid Waste 35.7
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 58.6
Cardio-vascular 79.3
Low Birth Weights 68.1
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 51.5
Housing 70.8
3659
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 29 / 32
Linguistic 15.6
Poverty 40.3
Unemployment 40.6

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 50.9816502
Employed 66.62389324
Median HI 72.65494675
Education —
Bachelor's or higher 43.46208136
High school enrollment 100
Preschool enrollment 17.18208649
Transportation —
Auto Access 93.63531374
Active commuting 23.14897985
Social —
2-parent households 66.79070961
Voting 49.36481458
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability 65.76414731
Park access 55.29321186
Retail density 20.00513281
Supermarket access 52.71397408
Tree canopy 13.73027076
3660
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 30 / 32
Housing—
Homeownership 73.48902862
Housing habitability 38.94520724
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 67.22699859 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 48.14577185
Uncrowded housing 46.38778391
Health Outcomes—
Insured adults 44.20633902
Arthritis 84.5
Asthma ER Admissions 52.8
High Blood Pressure 89.6
Cancer (excluding skin) 77.2
Asthma 51.9
Coronary Heart Disease 88.8
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 81.8
Diagnosed Diabetes 68.9
Life Expectancy at Birth 43.6
Cognitively Disabled 92.5
Physically Disabled 86.7
Heart Attack ER Admissions 10.7
Mental Health Not Good 52.8
Chronic Kidney Disease 85.5
Obesity 50.5
Pedestrian Injuries 19.6
Physical Health Not Good 65.0
Stroke 84.7
Health Risk Behaviors—
3661
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 31 / 32
Binge Drinking 15.4
Current Smoker 54.4
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 62.4
Climate Change Exposures —
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
Children 51.6
Elderly 87.4
English Speaking 59.0
Foreign-born 27.3
Outdoor Workers 53.0
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 70.3
Traffic Density 21.2
Traffic Access 23.0
Other Indices —
Hardship 44.7
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 55.1

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 76.0 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 53.0 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) Yes Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) No Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No 3662
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 32 / 32
a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use Acreage adjusted based on site plan
Construction: Construction Phases Schedule adjusted based on data from the Project team.

Construction: Off-Road Equipment Equipment based on data from the Project team.

Construction: Architectural Coatings Project will use super-compliant coatings 3663
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 1 / 36
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated

3.3. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated

3.5. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated

3.7. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated

3.9. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated

3.11. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated
3664
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 2 / 36

3.13. Paving (2026) - Unmitigated

3.15. Architectural Coating (2026) - Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation
3665
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 3 / 36

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details
3666
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 4 / 36

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures

8. User Changes to Default Data
3667
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 5 / 36

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name 14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Mitigated Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.80
Precipitation (days) 20.8
Location 34.01284450351814, -117.57158813842331
County San Bernardino-South Coast
City Ontario
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 5261
EDFZ 10
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Southern California Gas

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Single Family
Housing
603 Dwelling Unit 81.3 1,175,850 708,721 — 1,996 —
Condo/Townhouse 2,000 Dwelling Unit 55.9 2,120,000 242,283 — 6,620 — City Park 27.0 Acre 27.0 0.00 1,176,120 1,176,120 — —
3668
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 6 / 36
Regional Shopping
Center
526 1000sqft 12.1 525,990 342,382 — — —
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
105 1000sqft 2.42 105,198 0.00 — — —
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru

70.1 1000sqft 1.61 70,132 0.00 — — —
Gasoline/Service
Station

48.0 Pump 0.16 6,776 0.00 — — —
Parking Lot 54.5 Acre 54.5 0.00 0.00 — — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 14.0 49.3 73.1 256 0.21 0.85 32.3 33.1 0.81 8.35 8.69 — 51,709 51,709 2.35 2.23 127 52,561 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 13.4 48.6 74.4 215 0.21 0.85 32.3 33.1 0.81 7.65 8.45 — 49,051 49,051 2.00 2.28 3.30 49,771 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 8.60 22.7 41.8 134 0.12 0.45 21.0 21.5 0.43 4.98 5.41 — 31,329 31,329 1.21 1.55 36.6 31,850 3669
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 7 / 36
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
(Max)
Unmit. 1.57 4.15 7.62 24.5 0.02 0.08 3.84 3.92 0.08 0.91 0.99 — 5,187 5,187 0.20 0.26 6.06 5,273

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 3.09 2.85 63.2 115 0.21 0.59 18.1 18.5 0.58 8.35 8.69 — 23,736 23,736 1.06 0.60 11.1 23,953 2025 11.7 10.2 63.0 201 0.21 0.59 26.7 27.2 0.58 6.34 6.79 — 41,436 41,436 1.96 2.03 118 42,209 2026 14.0 49.3 73.1 256 0.17 0.85 32.3 33.1 0.81 7.65 8.45 — 51,709 51,709 2.35 2.23 127 52,561 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 3.07 2.83 63.3 114 0.21 0.63 9.53 10.1 0.59 3.33 3.91 — 23,665 23,665 1.07 0.60 0.29 23,871 2025 11.2 9.69 63.1 164 0.21 0.59 26.7 27.2 0.58 6.34 6.79 — 39,212 39,212 2.00 2.03 3.07 39,870 2026 13.4 48.6 74.4 215 0.17 0.85 32.3 33.1 0.81 7.65 8.45 — 49,051 49,051 1.46 2.28 3.30 49,771 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 1.78 1.64 36.7 66.2 0.12 0.35 7.96 8.31 0.34 3.36 3.70 — 13,571 13,571 0.61 0.33 2.63 13,686 2025 6.03 5.24 38.2 108 0.11 0.36 14.9 15.2 0.35 3.78 4.13 — 24,512 24,512 1.21 1.11 25.6 24,900 2026 8.60 22.7 41.8 134 0.10 0.45 21.0 21.5 0.43 4.98 5.41 — 31,329 31,329 0.92 1.55 36.6 31,850 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 0.32 0.30 6.71 12.1 0.02 0.06 1.45 1.52 0.06 0.61 0.68 — 2,247 2,247 0.10 0.05 0.44 2,266 2025 1.10 0.96 6.97 19.8 0.02 0.07 2.72 2.78 0.06 0.69 0.75 — 4,058 4,058 0.20 0.18 4.24 4,122 2026 1.57 4.15 7.62 24.5 0.02 0.08 3.84 3.92 0.08 0.91 0.99 — 5,187 5,187 0.15 0.26 6.06 5,273 3670
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 8 / 36

3. Construction Emissions Details

1.24 1.24 35.7 54.5 0.10 0.60 — 0.60 0.57 — 0.57 — 10,276 10,276 0.42 0.08 — 10,311 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.30 0.30 — 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.22 0.22 6.36 9.71 0.02 0.11 — 0.11 0.10 — 0.10 — 1,830 1,830 0.07 0.01 — 1,836 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.05 0.05 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.04 0.04 1.16 1.77 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 303 303 0.01 < 0.005 — 304 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.01 0.01 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
3671
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 9 / 36
Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.25 0.22 0.26 2.88 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 594 594 0.03 0.02 0.07 601 Vendor 0.11 0.03 1.24 0.65 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.07 0.01 0.02 0.04 — 1,035 1,035 0.08 0.15 0.07 1,083 Hauling 0.05 0.01 0.48 0.26 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 374 374 0.04 0.06 0.02 393 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 107 107 0.01 < 0.005 0.20 109 Vendor 0.02 < 0.005 0.22 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 184 184 0.01 0.03 0.22 193 Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.09 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 66.6 66.6 0.01 0.01 0.06 70.0 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 17.8 17.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 18.0 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 30.5 30.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 32.0 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.0 11.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 11.6

3.3. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
3672
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 10 / 36
Off-Road 2.03 2.03 47.1 89.9 0.15 0.31 — 0.31 0.31 — 0.31 — 16,588 16,588 0.67 0.13 — 16,644 Equipment
Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 17.0 17.0 — 8.06 8.06 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.61 0.61 14.2 27.1 0.05 0.09 — 0.09 0.09 — 0.09 — 4,999 4,999 0.20 0.04 — 5,016 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 5.12 5.12 — 2.43 2.43 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.11 0.11 2.59 4.94 0.01 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 828 828 0.03 0.01 — 830 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.93 0.93 — 0.44 0.44 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.30 0.27 0.25 4.44 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 756 756 0.03 0.03 3.02 767 3673
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 11 / 36
Vendor 0.18 0.05 1.98 1.06 0.01 0.02 0.10 0.12 0.02 0.04 0.06 — 1,724 1,724 0.13 0.26 4.81 1,809 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.09 0.08 0.09 1.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 212 212 0.01 0.01 0.39 215 Vendor 0.05 0.01 0.62 0.32 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.02 — 520 520 0.04 0.08 0.62 544 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.19 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 35.1 35.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 35.5 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.11 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 86.1 86.1 0.01 0.01 0.10 90.1 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

2.46 2.46 59.7 109 0.19 0.55 — 0.55 0.54 — 0.54 — 20,145 20,145 0.82 0.16 — 20,214 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 8.01 8.01 — 2.94 2.94 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3674
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 12 / 36
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Off-Road
Equipment

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.59 0.59 14.3 25.9 0.04 0.13 — 0.13 0.13 — 0.13 — 4,810 4,810 0.20 0.04 — 4,826 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 1.91 1.91 — 0.70 0.70 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.11 0.11 2.60 4.73 0.01 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 796 796 0.03 0.01 — 799 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.35 0.35 — 0.13 0.13 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.34 0.31 0.29 5.08 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 864 864 0.04 0.03 3.45 877 3675
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 13 / 36
Vendor 0.29 0.08 3.13 1.68 0.02 0.04 0.16 0.20 0.04 0.06 0.10 — 2,728 2,728 0.21 0.41 7.61 2,862 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.33 0.30 0.34 3.84 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 792 792 0.04 0.03 0.09 802 Vendor 0.28 0.07 3.26 1.70 0.02 0.04 0.16 0.20 0.04 0.06 0.10 — 2,729 2,729 0.21 0.41 0.20 2,856 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.08 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 192 192 0.01 0.01 0.36 194 Vendor 0.07 0.02 0.78 0.40 < 0.005 0.01 0.04 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.02 — 651 651 0.05 0.10 0.78 682 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.18 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 31.7 31.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 32.2 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.14 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 108 108 0.01 0.02 0.13 113 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

2.46 2.46 59.7 109 0.19 0.55 — 0.55 0.54 — 0.54 — 20,146 20,146 0.82 0.16 — 20,215 3676
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 14 / 36
Dust — — — — — — 8.01 8.01 — 2.94 2.94 — — — — — — —
From
Material
Movement
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.58 0.58 14.0 25.5 0.04 0.13 — 0.13 0.13 — 0.13 — 4,731 4,731 0.19 0.04 — 4,747 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 1.88 1.88 — 0.69 0.69 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.11 0.11 2.56 4.65 0.01 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 783 783 0.03 0.01 — 786 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.34 0.34 — 0.13 0.13 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3677
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 15 / 36
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.30 0.28 0.26 4.67 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 845 845 0.04 0.03 3.14 858 Vendor 0.27 0.08 2.98 1.61 0.02 0.04 0.16 0.20 0.04 0.06 0.10 — 2,684 2,684 0.21 0.41 7.55 2,818 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.29 0.26 0.29 3.52 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 775 775 0.04 0.03 0.08 785 Vendor 0.26 0.07 3.11 1.62 0.02 0.04 0.16 0.20 0.04 0.06 0.10 — 2,685 2,685 0.21 0.41 0.20 2,812 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.87 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 185 185 0.01 0.01 0.32 187 Vendor 0.06 0.02 0.74 0.38 < 0.005 0.01 0.04 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.02 — 630 630 0.05 0.10 0.77 661 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.16 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 30.6 30.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 31.0 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.13 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 104 104 0.01 0.02 0.13 109 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.9. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
3678
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 16 / 36
Off-Road
Equipment

1.40 1.34 30.8 48.6 0.08 0.37 — 0.37 0.35 — 0.35 — 7,891 7,891 0.32 0.06 — 7,918 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.40 1.34 30.8 48.6 0.08 0.37 — 0.37 0.35 — 0.35 — 7,891 7,891 0.32 0.06 — 7,918 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.67 0.64 14.8 23.3 0.04 0.18 — 0.18 0.17 — 0.17 — 3,783 3,783 0.15 0.03 — 3,796 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.12 0.12 2.70 4.25 0.01 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 626 626 0.03 0.01 — 629 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 9.66 8.72 8.36 148 0.00 0.00 1.55 1.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 26,789 26,789 1.11 0.94 99.4 27,197 Vendor 0.67 0.19 7.50 4.06 0.05 0.10 0.39 0.49 0.10 0.15 0.25 — 6,756 6,756 0.52 1.02 19.0 7,093 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 9.12 8.17 9.22 112 0.00 0.00 1.55 1.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 24,561 24,561 1.15 0.94 2.57 24,873 3679
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 17 / 36
Vendor 0.66 0.18 7.84 4.07 0.05 0.10 0.39 0.49 0.10 0.15 0.25 — 6,760 6,760 0.52 1.02 0.49 7,078 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 4.33 3.86 4.79 56.5 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 11,942 11,942 0.55 0.45 20.6 12,111 Vendor 0.32 0.09 3.78 1.93 0.02 0.05 0.19 0.24 0.05 0.07 0.12 — 3,240 3,240 0.25 0.49 3.95 3,396 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.79 0.70 0.87 10.3 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 1,977 1,977 0.09 0.07 3.41 2,005 Vendor 0.06 0.02 0.69 0.35 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.02 — 536 536 0.04 0.08 0.65 562 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1.40 1.34 30.8 48.6 0.08 0.37 — 0.37 0.35 — 0.35 — 7,890 7,890 0.32 0.06 — 7,917 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.40 1.34 30.8 48.6 0.08 0.37 — 0.37 0.35 — 0.35 — 7,890 7,890 0.32 0.06 — 7,917 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3680
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 18 / 36
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.00 0.95 22.0 34.7 0.05 0.26 — 0.26 0.25 — 0.25 — 5,635 5,635 0.23 0.05 — 5,655 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.18 0.17 4.02 6.33 0.01 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 933 933 0.04 0.01 — 936 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 9.12 8.22 7.50 137 0.00 0.00 1.55 1.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 26,242 26,242 1.11 0.90 89.8 26,628 Vendor 0.67 0.14 7.18 3.89 0.05 0.10 0.39 0.49 0.10 0.15 0.25 — 6,643 6,643 0.47 1.02 17.5 6,977 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 8.61 7.67 8.36 103 0.00 0.00 1.55 1.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 24,066 24,066 0.38 0.94 2.33 24,359 Vendor 0.66 0.13 7.47 3.95 0.05 0.10 0.39 0.49 0.10 0.15 0.25 — 6,647 6,647 0.47 1.02 0.45 6,964 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 6.15 5.48 6.53 77.7 0.00 0.00 1.11 1.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 17,431 17,431 0.27 0.67 27.7 17,666 Vendor 0.47 0.09 5.37 2.80 0.04 0.07 0.28 0.35 0.07 0.11 0.18 — 4,746 4,746 0.34 0.73 5.38 4,978 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 1.12 1.00 1.19 14.2 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 2,886 2,886 0.04 0.11 4.59 2,925 3681
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 19 / 36
Vendor 0.09 0.02 0.98 0.51 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.06 0.01 0.02 0.03 — 786 786 0.06 0.12 0.89 824 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.69 0.69 21.6 31.8 0.04 0.26 — 0.26 0.24 — 0.24 — 4,532 4,532 0.18 0.04 — 4,547 Paving — 1.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.69 0.69 21.6 31.8 0.04 0.26 — 0.26 0.24 — 0.24 — 4,532 4,532 0.18 0.04 — 4,547 Paving — 1.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.17 0.17 5.21 7.67 0.01 0.06 — 0.06 0.06 — 0.06 — 1,093 1,093 0.04 0.01 — 1,096 Paving — 0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
3682
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 20 / 36
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.03 0.95 1.40 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 181 181 0.01 < 0.005 — 182 Paving — 0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

3.15. Architectural Coating (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) 3683 14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 21 / 36
Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.08 0.08 4.28 3.85 0.01 0.12 — 0.12 0.11 — 0.11 — 534 534 0.02 < 0.005 — 536 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 35.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.08 0.08 4.28 3.85 0.01 0.12 — 0.12 0.11 — 0.11 — 534 534 0.02 < 0.005 — 536 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 35.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.04 0.04 1.80 1.63 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 225 225 0.01 < 0.005 — 226 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 14.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.33 0.30 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 37.3 37.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 37.4 3684
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 22 / 36
Architect
Coatings
— 2.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type
3685
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 23 / 36

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
3687
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 25 / 36
Sequest — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

5. Activity Data

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial
Saws
Diesel Tier 4 Interim 3.00 8.00 33.0 0.73
Demolition Excavators Diesel Tier 4 Interim 9.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 6.00 8.00 367 0.40 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 9.00 8.00 367 0.40 3688
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 26 / 36
Grading Excavators Diesel Tier 4 Interim 6.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Grading Graders Diesel Tier 4 Interim 3.00 8.00 148 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 3.00 8.00 367 0.40 Grading Scrapers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 6.00 8.00 423 0.48 Building Construction Cranes Diesel Tier 4 Interim 3.00 8.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Tier 4 Interim 9.00 8.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Tier 4 Interim 3.00 8.00 14.0 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Tier 4 Interim 9.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Welders Diesel Tier 4 Interim 3.00 8.00 46.0 0.45 Paving Pavers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 6.00 8.00 81.0 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Tier 4 Interim 6.00 8.00 89.0 0.36 Paving Rollers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 6.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Tier 4 Interim 3.00 8.00 37.0 0.48 Site Preparation Crawler Tractors Diesel Tier 4 Interim 12.0 8.00 87.0 0.43 Grading Crawler Tractors Diesel Tier 4 Interim 6.00 8.00 87.0 0.43

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Demolition — — — —
Demolition Worker 45.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Demolition Vendor 33.0 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Demolition Hauling 5.31 20.0 HHDT
Demolition Onsite truck — — HHDT
Site Preparation — — — —
Site Preparation Worker 52.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 3689
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 27 / 36
Site Preparation Vendor 55.0 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDT
Grading — — — —
Grading Worker 60.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor 87.0 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction — — — —
Building Construction Worker 1,901 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 219 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
Paving — — — —
Paving Worker 45.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT
Architectural Coating — — — —
Architectural Coating Worker 380 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user. 3690 14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 28 / 36

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Control Strategies Applied Frequency (per day) PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction Water Exposed Area 3 74% 74%
Water Demolished Area 2 36% 36%

5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
Single Family Housing 6.64 0%
Condo/Townhouse — 0%
City Park 0.00 0%
Regional Shopping Center 0.00 0%
3691
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 29 / 36
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 0.00 0%
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 0.00 0%
Gasoline/Service Station 0.00 0%
Parking Lot 54.5 100%

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
3692
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 30 / 36
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 2 0 0 N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A
Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A 3693
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 31 / 36
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality 0 0 0 N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. 3694 14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 32 / 36
Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators—
AQ-Ozone 84.6
AQ-PM 95.6
AQ-DPM 57.0
Drinking Water 93.3
Lead Risk Housing 7.89
Pesticides 64.8
Toxic Releases 71.4
Traffic 14.2
Effect Indicators—
CleanUp Sites 7.71
Groundwater 81.4
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 81.9
Impaired Water Bodies 43.8
Solid Waste 35.7
Sensitive Population—
Asthma 58.6
Cardio-vascular 79.3
Low Birth Weights 68.1
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators—
Education 51.5
Housing 70.8
Linguistic 15.6
Poverty 40.3
Unemployment 40.6
3695
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 33 / 36

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 50.9816502
Employed 66.62389324
Median HI 72.65494675
Education —
Bachelor's or higher 43.46208136
High school enrollment 100
Preschool enrollment 17.18208649
Transportation —
Auto Access 93.63531374
Active commuting 23.14897985
Social —
2-parent households 66.79070961
Voting 49.36481458
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability 65.76414731
Park access 55.29321186
Retail density 20.00513281
Supermarket access 52.71397408
Tree canopy 13.73027076
Housing —
Homeownership 73.48902862
Housing habitability 38.94520724
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 67.22699859 3696
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 34 / 36
Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 48.14577185
Uncrowded housing 46.38778391
Health Outcomes—
Insured adults 44.20633902
Arthritis 84.5
Asthma ER Admissions 52.8
High Blood Pressure 89.6
Cancer (excluding skin) 77.2
Asthma 51.9
Coronary Heart Disease 88.8
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 81.8
Diagnosed Diabetes 68.9
Life Expectancy at Birth 43.6
Cognitively Disabled 92.5
Physically Disabled 86.7
Heart Attack ER Admissions 10.7
Mental Health Not Good 52.8
Chronic Kidney Disease 85.5
Obesity 50.5
Pedestrian Injuries 19.6
Physical Health Not Good 65.0
Stroke 84.7
Health Risk Behaviors—
Binge Drinking 15.4
Current Smoker 54.4
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 62.4
Climate Change Exposures—
3697
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 35 / 36
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
Children 51.6
Elderly 87.4
English Speaking 59.0
Foreign-born 27.3
Outdoor Workers 53.0
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 70.3
Traffic Density 21.2
Traffic Access 23.0
Other Indices —
Hardship 44.7
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 55.1

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 76.0 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 53.0 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) Yes Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) No Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
3698
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Construction Mitigated Detailed Report, 10/13/2022 36 / 36
No Health & Equity Measures selected.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.

Construction: Architectural Coatings Project will use super-compliant coatings. 3699
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
This page intentionally left blank
3700
Rich-Haven Specific Plan, 2022 Amendment Air Quality Impact Analysis 14822-04 AQ Report
APPENDIX 5.3:

CALEEMOD OPERATIONS EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS
3701
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 1 / 50
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source
3702
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 2 / 50

4.3.2. Unmitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.2. Unmitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.2. Unmitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated 3703
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 3 / 50

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
3704
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 4 / 50

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
3705
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 5 / 50

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures

8. User Changes to Default Data
3706
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 6 / 50

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name 14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.80
Precipitation (days) 20.8
Location 34.012654365759644, -117.57100716437458
County San Bernardino-South Coast
City Ontario
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 5261
EDFZ 10
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Southern California Gas

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Office Park 317 1000sqft 7.27 316,725 0.00 — — —
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
454 1000sqft 10.4 454,244 0.00 — — —
3707
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 7 / 50
Unrefrigerated 1,996 1000sqft 45.8 1,996,180 531,432 — — — Warehouse-No Rail
User Defined
Industrial
2,767 User Defined Unit 0.00 0.00 0.00 — — —
Condo/Townhouse 3,289 Dwelling Unit 106 3,486,340 1,045,440 — 10,887 — Single Family
Housing
822 Dwelling Unit 72.5 1,602,900 631,620 — 2,721 —
Strip Mall 7.50 1000sqft 0.17 7,500 4,356 — — —
Gasoline/Service
Station

48.0 Pump 0.16 6,776 0.00 — — —
Regional Shopping
Center
162 1000sqft 3.72 162,137 109,336 — — —
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

32.4 1000sqft 0.74 32,427 0.00 — — —
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru

21.6 1000sqft 0.50 21,618 0.00 — — —
City Park 1.30 Acre 1.30 0.00 56,628 56,628 — —
Parking Lot 58.0 Acre 58.0 0.00 0.00 — — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
3708
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 8 / 50
Unmit. 328 481 397 2,203 5.23 12.3 136 149 12.1 25.2 37.3 5,170 658,569 663,739 561 38.0 2,365 691,464 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 264 419 412 1,594 4.97 12.0 136 148 11.8 25.2 36.9 5,170 633,433 638,603 562 38.6 632 664,788 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 227 389 301 1,444 3.60 6.95 100 107 6.83 18.7 25.5 5,170 458,589 463,759 555 32.4 1,157 488,435 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 41.4 71.0 55.0 264 0.66 1.27 18.3 19.5 1.25 3.41 4.65 856 75,925 76,781 91.9 5.36 191 80,866

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 271 242 295 1,792 4.59 4.16 136 141 3.93 25.2 29.1 — 478,611 478,611 29.4 33.2 1,779 491,015 Area 52.4 236 61.4 387 0.39 4.95 — 4.95 5.04 — 5.04 0.00 74,736 74,736 1.43 0.25 — 74,846 Energy 4.54 2.27 39.9 24.3 0.25 3.14 — 3.14 3.14 — 3.14 — 99,635 99,635 9.13 0.67 — 100,063 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 1,579 5,587 7,166 162 3.91 — 12,391 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 3,591 0.00 3,591 359 0.00 — 12,565 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 585 585
Total 328 481 397 2,203 5.23 12.3 136 149 12.1 25.2 37.3 5,170 658,569 663,739 561 38.0 2,365 691,464 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 253 224 314 1,545 4.36 4.17 136 141 3.93 25.2 29.1 — 454,635 454,635 30.5 33.8 46.1 465,532 3709
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 9 / 50
Area 6.78 193 58.0 24.7 0.37 4.69 — 4.69 4.69 — 4.69 0.00 73,577 73,577 1.39 0.14 — 73,653 Energy 4.54 2.27 39.9 24.3 0.25 3.14 — 3.14 3.14 — 3.14 — 99,635 99,635 9.13 0.67 — 100,063 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 1,579 5,587 7,166 162 3.91 — 12,391 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 3,591 0.00 3,591 359 0.00 — 12,565 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 585 585
Total 264 419 412 1,594 4.97 12.0 136 148 11.8 25.2 36.9 5,170 633,433 638,603 562 38.6 632 664,788 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 191 168 255 1,170 3.32 3.31 100 103 3.12 18.7 21.8 — 347,534 347,534 24.2 27.7 571 356,969 Area 31.7 219 6.31 250 0.04 0.50 — 0.50 0.56 — 0.56 0.00 5,834 5,834 0.13 0.08 — 5,862 Energy 4.54 2.27 39.9 24.3 0.25 3.14 — 3.14 3.14 — 3.14 — 99,635 99,635 9.13 0.67 — 100,063 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 1,579 5,587 7,166 162 3.91 — 12,391 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 3,591 0.00 3,591 359 0.00 — 12,565 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 585 585
Total 227 389 301 1,444 3.60 6.95 100 107 6.83 18.7 25.5 5,170 458,589 463,759 555 32.4 1,157 488,435 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 34.8 30.6 46.5 213 0.61 0.60 18.3 18.9 0.57 3.41 3.98 — 57,538 57,538 4.00 4.59 94.6 59,100 Area 5.79 40.0 1.15 45.6 0.01 0.09 — 0.09 0.10 — 0.10 0.00 966 966 0.02 0.01 — 970 Energy 0.83 0.41 7.28 4.44 0.05 0.57 — 0.57 0.57 — 0.57 — 16,496 16,496 1.51 0.11 — 16,567 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 261 925 1,186 26.9 0.65 — 2,052 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 595 0.00 595 59.4 0.00 — 2,080 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 96.9 96.9
Total 41.4 71.0 55.0 264 0.66 1.27 18.3 19.5 1.25 3.41 4.65 856 75,925 76,781 91.9 5.36 191 80,866

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use
3710
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 10 / 50

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Office
Park

3.55 3.31 1.63 29.8 0.06 0.03 0.26 0.29 0.02 0.08 0.10 — 5,715 5,715 0.25 0.16 22.2 5,793 Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail

2.26 2.10 1.03 18.9 0.04 0.02 0.17 0.18 0.02 0.05 0.07 — 3,631 3,631 0.16 0.10 14.1 3,680 Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

17.7 16.5 8.11 148 0.28 0.13 1.30 1.43 0.12 0.39 0.51 — 28,480 28,480 1.27 0.82 111 28,867 User
Defined
Industrial

12.0 2.72 117 67.5 0.94 1.62 8.23 9.85 1.55 2.67 4.22 — 103,990 103,990 8.93 15.6 305 109,165 Condo/T
ownhous
e

82.2 75.7 61.0 560 1.22 0.87 6.69 7.57 0.82 2.07 2.89 — 125,367 125,367 6.76 6.03 495 127,829 Single
Family
Housing

34.5 31.8 25.6 235 0.51 0.37 2.81 3.17 0.34 0.87 1.21 — 52,581 52,581 2.83 2.53 208 53,613 Strip Mall 1.49 1.37 1.16 10.8 0.02 0.02 0.13 0.15 0.02 0.04 0.06 — 2,450 2,450 0.13 0.12 9.71 2,497 Gasoline
/Service
Station

18.8 17.2 14.6 135 0.30 0.21 1.65 1.86 0.20 0.51 0.71 — 30,844 30,844 1.60 1.46 122 31,439 Regional
Shopping
Center

53.1 50.0 29.5 257 0.49 0.37 2.64 3.01 0.35 0.82 1.16 — 50,567 50,567 3.64 2.83 195 51,696 3711
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 11 / 50
High
Turnover
(Sit Down
Restaurant)

12.7 11.6 9.91 91.6 0.20 0.14 1.12 1.26 0.14 0.35 0.48 — 20,874 20,874 1.08 0.99 82.7 21,277 Fast
Food
Restaurant
with Drive
Thru

32.9 30.2 25.7 237 0.53 0.38 2.90 3.27 0.35 0.90 1.25 — 54,092 54,092 2.80 2.55 214 55,137 City Park 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 21.1 21.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 21.5 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 271 242 295 1,792 4.59 4.16 27.9 32.0 3.93 8.74 12.7 — 478,611 478,611 29.4 33.2 1,779 491,015 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Office
Park

3.37 3.12 1.80 25.0 0.05 0.03 0.26 0.29 0.02 0.08 0.10 — 5,266 5,266 0.27 0.18 0.58 5,325 Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail

2.14 1.98 1.14 15.9 0.03 0.02 0.17 0.18 0.02 0.05 0.07 — 3,345 3,345 0.17 0.11 0.37 3,383 Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

16.8 15.6 8.97 124 0.26 0.13 1.30 1.43 0.12 0.39 0.51 — 26,239 26,239 1.35 0.88 2.87 26,537 User
Defined
Industrial

11.9 2.64 122 67.5 0.94 1.62 8.23 9.85 1.55 2.67 4.22 — 104,009 104,009 8.92 15.6 7.91 108,890 Condo/T
ownhous
e

76.3 69.7 65.5 478 1.14 0.88 6.69 7.57 0.82 2.07 2.89 — 117,518 117,518 7.09 6.25 12.8 119,570 Single
Family
Housing

32.0 29.2 27.5 200 0.48 0.37 2.81 3.17 0.34 0.87 1.21 — 49,289 49,289 2.97 2.62 5.39 50,149 3712
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 12 / 50
Strip Mall 1.39 1.26 1.25 9.11 0.02 0.02 0.13 0.15 0.02 0.04 0.06 — 2,296 2,296 0.13 0.12 0.25 2,336 Gasoline
/Service
Station

17.5 15.9 15.7 115 0.28 0.21 1.65 1.86 0.20 0.51 0.71 — 28,906 28,906 1.67 1.51 3.17 29,400 Regional
Shopping
Center

49.0 45.8 31.6 231 0.46 0.37 2.64 3.01 0.35 0.82 1.17 — 47,490 47,490 3.90 2.92 5.06 48,464 High
Turnover
(Sit Down
Restaurant)

11.8 10.7 10.7 77.6 0.19 0.14 1.12 1.26 0.14 0.35 0.48 — 19,563 19,563 1.13 1.02 2.14 19,897 Fast
Food
Restaurant
with Drive
Thru

30.6 27.8 27.6 201 0.49 0.38 2.90 3.27 0.35 0.90 1.25 — 50,694 50,694 2.93 2.64 5.56 51,560 City Park 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 19.8 19.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 20.1 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 253 224 314 1,545 4.36 4.17 27.9 32.1 3.93 8.74 12.7 — 454,635 454,635 30.5 33.8 46.1 465,532 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Office
Park

0.53 0.49 0.29 4.14 0.01 < 0.005 0.04 0.05 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 — 773 773 0.04 0.03 1.39 783 Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.34 0.31 0.19 2.62 0.01 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 490 490 0.02 0.02 0.88 496 Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

2.89 2.68 1.60 22.5 0.05 0.02 0.23 0.25 0.02 0.07 0.09 — 4,196 4,196 0.21 0.14 7.54 4,251 User
Defined
Industrial

2.04 0.46 21.2 11.5 0.16 0.28 1.41 1.69 0.27 0.46 0.72 — 16,176 16,176 1.39 2.43 20.5 16,954 3713
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 13 / 50
Condo/T 12.1 11.0 10.6 78.6 0.18 0.14 1.06 1.20 0.13 0.33 0.46 — 17,136 17,136 1.02 0.91 30.9 17,464 Single
Family
Housing

5.69 5.19 5.00 37.1 0.09 0.07 0.50 0.57 0.06 0.16 0.22 — 8,092 8,092 0.48 0.43 14.6 8,247 Strip Mall 0.21 0.19 0.20 1.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 326 326 0.02 0.02 0.59 332 Gasoline
/Service
Station

2.02 1.88 1.40 10.4 0.02 0.02 0.12 0.14 0.02 0.04 0.05 — 1,979 1,979 0.15 0.12 3.50 2,022 Regional
Shopping
Center

4.56 4.27 2.92 21.7 0.04 0.03 0.23 0.27 0.03 0.07 0.10 — 3,891 3,891 0.33 0.24 6.81 3,979 High
Turnover
(Sit Down
Restaurant)

1.31 1.22 0.96 7.11 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.10 0.01 0.03 0.04 — 1,395 1,395 0.10 0.08 2.48 1,424 Fast
Food
Restaurant
with Drive
Thru

3.11 2.89 2.17 16.1 0.03 0.03 0.19 0.21 0.02 0.06 0.08 — 3,081 3,081 0.23 0.18 5.45 3,147 City Park < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.56 2.56 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.61 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 34.8 30.6 46.5 213 0.61 0.60 3.92 4.53 0.57 1.23 1.80 — 57,538 57,538 4.00 4.59 94.6 59,100

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
3714
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 14 / 50
Office
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — — 5,280 5,280 0.50 0.06 — 5,310
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 9,500 9,500 0.90 0.11 — 9,555
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 8,806 8,806 0.83 0.10 — 8,857
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Condo/T
ownhous
e
— — — — — — — — — — — — 15,232 15,232 1.44 0.17 — 15,320 Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — 5,975 5,975 0.57 0.07 — 6,009
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — 69.7 69.7 0.01 < 0.005 — 70.1 Gasoline
/Service
Station
— — — — — — — — — — — — 61.7 61.7 0.01 < 0.005 — 62.1
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — — 1,507 1,507 0.14 0.02 — 1,515
High
Turnover
(Sit Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — — 1,086 1,086 0.10 0.01 — 1,092
Fast
Food
Restaurant
with Drive
Thru
— — — — — — — — — — — — 724 724 0.07 0.01 — 728
3715
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 15 / 50
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 2,114 2,114 0.20 0.02 — 2,126
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 50,355 50,355 4.77 0.58 — 50,646 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Office
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — — 5,280 5,280 0.50 0.06 — 5,310
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 9,500 9,500 0.90 0.11 — 9,555
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 8,806 8,806 0.83 0.10 — 8,857
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Condo/T
ownhous
e
— — — — — — — — — — — — 15,232 15,232 1.44 0.17 — 15,320 Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — 5,975 5,975 0.57 0.07 — 6,009
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — 69.7 69.7 0.01 < 0.005 — 70.1 Gasoline
/Service
Station
— — — — — — — — — — — — 61.7 61.7 0.01 < 0.005 — 62.1
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — — 1,507 1,507 0.14 0.02 — 1,515
3716
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 16 / 50
High — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,086 1,086 0.10 0.01 — 1,092 Turnover
(Sit
Down
Restaurant)
Fast
Food
Restaurant
with Drive
Thru
— — — — — — — — — — — — 724 724 0.07 0.01 — 728
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 2,114 2,114 0.20 0.02 — 2,126
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 50,355 50,355 4.77 0.58 — 50,646 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Office
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — — 874 874 0.08 0.01 — 879
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 1,573 1,573 0.15 0.02 — 1,582
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 1,458 1,458 0.14 0.02 — 1,466
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Condo/T
ownhous
e
— — — — — — — — — — — — 2,522 2,522 0.24 0.03 — 2,536
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — 989 989 0.09 0.01 — 995
3717
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 17 / 50
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — 11.5 11.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.6 Gasoline
/Service
Station
— — — — — — — — — — — — 10.2 10.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.3 Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — — 249 249 0.02 < 0.005 — 251
High
Turnover
(Sit Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — — 180 180 0.02 < 0.005 — 181
Fast
Food
Restaurant
with Drive
Thru
— — — — — — — — — — — — 120 120 0.01 < 0.005 — 121
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 350 350 0.03 < 0.005 — 352
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 8,337 8,337 0.79 0.10 — 8,385

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Office
Park

0.26 0.13 2.33 1.96 0.01 0.18 — 0.18 0.18 — 0.18 — 2,785 2,785 0.25 0.01 — 2,793 Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.35 0.18 3.21 2.70 0.02 0.24 — 0.24 0.24 — 0.24 — 3,835 3,835 0.34 0.01 — 3,846 3718
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 18 / 50
Unrefrige
Warehouse-No
Rail

1.12 0.56 10.2 8.56 0.06 0.77 — 0.77 0.77 — 0.77 — 12,162 12,162 1.08 0.02 — 12,196 User
Defined
Industrial

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Condo/T
ownhous
e

1.83 0.92 15.6 6.66 0.10 1.27 — 1.27 1.27 — 1.27 — 19,861 19,861 1.76 0.04 — 19,916 Single
Family
Housing

0.76 0.38 6.49 2.76 0.04 0.53 — 0.53 0.53 — 0.53 — 8,243 8,243 0.73 0.02 — 8,266 Strip Mall < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.2 14.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.2 Gasoline
/Service
Station

0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 93.1 93.1 0.01 < 0.005 — 93.4 Regional
Shopping
Center

0.03 0.01 0.26 0.22 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 306 306 0.03 < 0.005 — 307 High
Turnover
(Sit Down
Restaurant)

0.11 0.05 1.00 0.84 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 1,188 1,188 0.11 < 0.005 — 1,191 Fast
Food
Restaurant
with Drive
Thru

0.07 0.04 0.66 0.56 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 792 792 0.07 < 0.005 — 794 City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 4.54 2.27 39.9 24.3 0.25 3.14 — 3.14 3.14 — 3.14 — 49,280 49,280 4.36 0.09 — 49,416 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
3719
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 19 / 50
Office 0.26 0.13 2.33 1.96 0.01 0.18 — 0.18 0.18 — 0.18 — 2,785 2,785 0.25 0.01 — 2,793 Park
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.35 0.18 3.21 2.70 0.02 0.24 — 0.24 0.24 — 0.24 — 3,835 3,835 0.34 0.01 — 3,846 Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

1.12 0.56 10.2 8.56 0.06 0.77 — 0.77 0.77 — 0.77 — 12,162 12,162 1.08 0.02 — 12,196 User
Defined
Industrial

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Condo/T
ownhous
e

1.83 0.92 15.6 6.66 0.10 1.27 — 1.27 1.27 — 1.27 — 19,861 19,861 1.76 0.04 — 19,916 Single
Family
Housing

0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 93.1 93.1 0.01 < 0.005 — 93.4 Regional
Shopping
Center

0.03 0.01 0.26 0.22 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 306 306 0.03 < 0.005 — 307 High
Turnover
(Sit Down
Restaurant)

0.11 0.05 1.00 0.84 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 1,188 1,188 0.11 < 0.005 — 1,191 Fast
Food
Restaurant
with Drive
Thru

0.07 0.04 0.66 0.56 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 792 792 0.07 < 0.005 — 794 3720
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 20 / 50
City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 4.54 2.27 39.9 24.3 0.25 3.14 — 3.14 3.14 — 3.14 — 49,280 49,280 4.36 0.09 — 49,416 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Office
Park

0.05 0.02 0.43 0.36 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 461 461 0.04 < 0.005 — 462 Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.06 0.03 0.59 0.49 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 635 635 0.06 < 0.005 — 637 Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.20 0.10 1.86 1.56 0.01 0.14 — 0.14 0.14 — 0.14 — 2,014 2,014 0.18 < 0.005 — 2,019 User
Defined
Industrial

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Condo/T
ownhous
e

0.33 0.17 2.86 1.22 0.02 0.23 — 0.23 0.23 — 0.23 — 3,288 3,288 0.29 0.01 — 3,297 Single
Family
Housing

0.14 0.07 1.19 0.50 0.01 0.10 — 0.10 0.10 — 0.10 — 1,365 1,365 0.12 < 0.005 — 1,368 Strip Mall < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 2.35 2.35 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.35 Gasoline
/Service
Station
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 15.4 15.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.5 Regional
Shopping
Center

0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 50.7 50.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 50.9 3721
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 21 / 50
High 0.02 0.01 0.18 0.15 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 197 197 0.02 < 0.005 — 197 Turnover
(Sit Down
Restaurant)
Fast
Food
Restaurant
with Drive
Thru

0.01 0.01 0.12 0.10 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 131 131 0.01 < 0.005 — 131 City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.83 0.41 7.28 4.44 0.05 0.57 — 0.57 0.57 — 0.57 — 8,159 8,159 0.72 0.02 — 8,181

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 6.78 3.39 58.0 24.7 0.37 4.69 — 4.69 4.69 — 4.69 0.00 73,577 73,577 1.39 0.14 — 73,653 Consum
er
Products
— 173 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 16.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

45.7 42.7 3.41 363 0.02 0.27 — 0.27 0.35 — 0.35 — 1,160 1,160 0.05 0.11 — 1,193 Total 52.4 236 61.4 387 0.39 4.95 — 4.95 5.04 — 5.04 0.00 74,736 74,736 1.43 0.25 — 74,846 3722
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 22 / 50
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 6.78 3.39 58.0 24.7 0.37 4.69 — 4.69 4.69 — 4.69 0.00 73,577 73,577 1.39 0.14 — 73,653 Consum
er
Products
— 173 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 16.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total 6.78 193 58.0 24.7 0.37 4.69 — 4.69 4.69 — 4.69 0.00 73,577 73,577 1.39 0.14 — 73,653 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.08 0.04 0.72 0.31 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.06 — 0.06 0.00 834 834 0.02 < 0.005 — 835 Consum
er
Products
— 31.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 3.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

5.71 5.34 0.43 45.3 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.04 — 0.04 — 132 132 0.01 0.01 — 135 Total 5.79 40.0 1.15 45.6 0.01 0.09 — 0.09 0.10 — 0.10 0.00 966 966 0.02 0.01 — 970

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e 3723
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 23 / 50
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Office
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — 108 366 474 11.1 0.27 — 831
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 201 683 884 20.7 0.50 — 1,550
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 885 3,045 3,929 91.0 2.19 — 6,857 User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Condo/T
ownhous
e
— — — — — — — — — — — 263 995 1,258 27.0 0.65 — 2,128
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 65.7 286 351 6.76 0.16 — 569
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — 1.06 3.97 5.03 0.11 < 0.005 — 8.56 Gasoline
/Service
Station
— — — — — — — — — — — 1.22 4.15 5.37 0.13 < 0.005 — 9.41 Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — 23.0 87.0 110 2.37 0.06 — 186
High
Turnover
(Sit Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — 18.9 64.0 82.9 1.94 0.05 — 145
3724
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 24 / 50
Fast — — — — — — — — — — — 12.6 42.7 55.2 1.29 0.03 — 96.8 Food
Restaurant
with
Drive
Thru
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 10.2 10.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.3 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 1,579 5,587 7,166 162 3.91 — 12,391 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Office
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — 108 366 474 11.1 0.27 — 831
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 201 683 884 20.7 0.50 — 1,550
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 885 3,045 3,929 91.0 2.19 — 6,857 User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Condo/T
ownhous
e
— — — — — — — — — — — 263 995 1,258 27.0 0.65 — 2,128
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 65.7 286 351 6.76 0.16 — 569
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — 1.06 3.97 5.03 0.11 < 0.005 — 8.56 3725
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 25 / 50
Gasoline — — — — — — — — — — — 1.22 4.15 5.37 0.13 < 0.005 — 9.41 /Service
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — 23.0 87.0 110 2.37 0.06 — 186
High
Turnover
(Sit Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — 18.9 64.0 82.9 1.94 0.05 — 145
Fast
Food
Restaurant
with Drive
Thru
— — — — — — — — — — — 12.6 42.7 55.2 1.29 0.03 — 96.8
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 10.2 10.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.3 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 1,579 5,587 7,166 162 3.91 — 12,391 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Office
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — 17.9 60.6 78.5 1.84 0.04 — 138
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 33.3 113 146 3.43 0.08 — 257
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 146 504 651 15.1 0.36 — 1,135
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
3726
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 26 / 50
Condo/T — — — — — — — — — — — 43.5 165 208 4.48 0.11 — 352 ownhous
e
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 10.9 47.3 58.2 1.12 0.03 — 94.2
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — 0.18 0.66 0.83 0.02 < 0.005 — 1.42 Gasoline
/Service
Station
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.20 0.69 0.89 0.02 < 0.005 — 1.56 Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — 3.81 14.4 18.2 0.39 0.01 — 30.8
High
Turnover
(Sit Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — 3.12 10.6 13.7 0.32 0.01 — 24.1
Fast
Food
Restaurant
with Drive
Thru
— — — — — — — — — — — 2.08 7.06 9.15 0.21 0.01 — 16.0
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 1.70 1.70 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.71 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 261 925 1,186 26.9 0.65 — 2,052

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e 3727
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 27 / 50
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Office
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — 159 0.00 159 15.9 0.00 — 555
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 230 0.00 230 23.0 0.00 — 805
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 1,011 0.00 1,011 101 0.00 — 3,538 User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Condo/T
ownhous
e
— — — — — — — — — — — 1,311 0.00 1,311 131 0.00 — 4,586 Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 428 0.00 428 42.8 0.00 — 1,498
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — 4.24 0.00 4.24 0.42 0.00 — 14.8 Gasoline
/Service
Station
— — — — — — — — — — — 13.9 0.00 13.9 1.39 0.00 — 48.8
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — 91.8 0.00 91.8 9.17 0.00 — 321
High
Turnover
(Sit Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — 208 0.00 208 20.8 0.00 — 728
3728
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 28 / 50
Fast — — — — — — — — — — — 134 0.00 134 13.4 0.00 — 470 Food
Restaurant
with
Drive
Thru
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — 0.06 0.00 0.06 0.01 0.00 — 0.21 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 3,591 0.00 3,591 359 0.00 — 12,565 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Office
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — 159 0.00 159 15.9 0.00 — 555
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 230 0.00 230 23.0 0.00 — 805
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 1,011 0.00 1,011 101 0.00 — 3,538 User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Condo/T
ownhous
e
— — — — — — — — — — — 1,311 0.00 1,311 131 0.00 — 4,586 Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 428 0.00 428 42.8 0.00 — 1,498
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — 4.24 0.00 4.24 0.42 0.00 — 14.8 3729
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 29 / 50
Gasoline — — — — — — — — — — — 13.9 0.00 13.9 1.39 0.00 — 48.8 /Service
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — 91.8 0.00 91.8 9.17 0.00 — 321
High
Turnover
(Sit Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — 208 0.00 208 20.8 0.00 — 728
Fast
Food
Restaurant
with Drive
Thru
— — — — — — — — — — — 134 0.00 134 13.4 0.00 — 470
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — 0.06 0.00 0.06 0.01 0.00 — 0.21 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 3,591 0.00 3,591 359 0.00 — 12,565 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Office
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — 26.3 0.00 26.3 2.63 0.00 — 92.0
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 38.1 0.00 38.1 3.81 0.00 — 133
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 167 0.00 167 16.7 0.00 — 586
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
3730
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 30 / 50
Condo/T — — — — — — — — — — — 217 0.00 217 21.7 0.00 — 759 ownhous
e
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 70.9 0.00 70.9 7.08 0.00 — 248
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — 0.70 0.00 0.70 0.07 0.00 — 2.46 Gasoline
/Service
Station
— — — — — — — — — — — 2.31 0.00 2.31 0.23 0.00 — 8.08
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — 15.2 0.00 15.2 1.52 0.00 — 53.1
High
Turnover
(Sit Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — 34.4 0.00 34.4 3.44 0.00 — 120
Fast
Food
Restaurant
with Drive
Thru
— — — — — — — — — — — 22.2 0.00 22.2 2.22 0.00 — 77.7
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — 0.01 0.00 0.01 < 0.005 0.00 — 0.03 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 595 0.00 595 59.4 0.00 — 2,080

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e 3731
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 31 / 50
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Office
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.77 0.77
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 463 463
Condo/T
ownhous
e
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 25.0 25.0
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 11.5 11.5
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.04 0.04
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.78 0.78
High
Turnover
(Sit Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 50.6 50.6
Fast
Food
Restaurant
with Drive
Thru
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 33.8 33.8
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 585 585
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Office
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.77 0.77
3732
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 32 / 50
Refrigera — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 463 463
ted
Condo/T
ownhous
e
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 25.0 25.0
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 11.5 11.5
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.04 0.04
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.78 0.78
High
Turnover
(Sit Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 50.6 50.6
Fast
Food
Restaurant
with Drive
Thru
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 33.8 33.8
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 585 585
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Office
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.13 0.13
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 76.7 76.7
Condo/T
ownhous
e
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.13 4.13
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.90 1.90
3733
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 33 / 50
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.01 0.01
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.13 0.13
High
Turnover
(Sit Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 8.39 8.39
Fast
Food
Restaurant
with Drive
Thru
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.59 5.59
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 96.9 96.9

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
3734
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 34 / 50

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
3735
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 35 / 50
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
3736
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 36 / 50
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
3737
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 37 / 50
Remove — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
d
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Office Park 888 669 327 283,479 7,525 5,670 2,769 2,401,918 Refrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
564 319 306 179,702 4,780 2,706 2,594 1,522,619
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
4,426 3,725 3,675 1,539,648 37,498 31,561 31,138 13,045,437 User Defined
Industrial
1,143 927 874 391,883 35,782 29,024 27,378 12,269,872
Condo/Townhouse 18,580 11,370 9,101 5,911,360 142,672 87,311 69,884 45,393,329 3738
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 38 / 50
Single Family 7,755 7,793 6,971 2,791,565 59,549 59,839 53,527 21,436,426 Housing
Strip Mall 330 237 75.2 102,332 2,796 2,011 637 867,056 Gasoline/Service
Station
2,496 4,154 4,154 1,083,962 5,649 35,198 35,198 5,143,326 Regional Shopping
Center
5,320 13,204 8,133 2,499,577 20,262 56,219 34,626 10,019,460 High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
1,662 2,155 2,811 692,267 5,554 18,260 23,821 3,642,197 Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
4,074 7,285 4,182 1,660,093 11,305 61,729 35,436 8,013,735 City Park 2.00 2.55 2.85 803 16.9 21.6 24.1 6,800
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
Hearth Type Unmitigated (number)
Condo/Townhouse —
Wood Fireplaces 0
Gas Fireplaces 2796
Propane Fireplaces 0
Electric Fireplaces 0
No Fireplaces 329
Single Family Housing —
Wood Fireplaces 0
Gas Fireplaces 699
3739
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 39 / 50
Propane Fireplaces 0
Electric Fireplaces 0
No Fireplaces 82

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft) Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft) Non-Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
10305711 3,435,237 4,496,411 1,498,804 151,589

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 250

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Office Park 5,527,449 349 0.0330 0.0040 8,690,939
Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 9,945,872 349 0.0330 0.0040 11,966,710 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail
9,219,763 349 0.0330 0.0040 37,948,738
User Defined Industrial 0.00 349 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Condo/Townhouse 15,946,932 349 0.0330 0.0040 61,972,315 Single Family Housing 6,255,109 349 0.0330 0.0040 25,720,146 Strip Mall 72,963 349 0.0330 0.0040 44,216
3740
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 40 / 50
Gasoline/Service Station 64,628 349 0.0330 0.0040 290,596 Regional Shopping Center 1,577,323 349 0.0330 0.0040 955,877 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
1,137,107 349 0.0330 0.0040 3,705,461
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive
Thru
758,071 349 0.0330 0.0040 2,470,307
City Park 0.00 349 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Parking Lot 2,213,196 349 0.0330 0.0040 0.00

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Office Park 56,292,721 0.00
Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 105,043,925 0.00
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 461,616,625 8,534,332
User Defined Industrial 0.00 0.00
Condo/Townhouse 137,089,385 20,519,706
Single Family Housing 34,261,926 12,397,322
Strip Mall 555,544 69,954
Gasoline/Service Station 637,531 0.00
Regional Shopping Center 12,009,896 1,755,840
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 9,842,688 0.00
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 6,561,792 0.00
City Park 0.00 2,020,880
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00

5.13. Operational Waste Generation
3741
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 41 / 50

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Office Park 295 0.00
Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 427 0.00
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 1,876 0.00
User Defined Industrial 0.00 0.00
Condo/Townhouse 735 0.00
Single Family Housing 240 0.00
Strip Mall 7.88 0.00
Gasoline/Service Station 25.9 0.00
Regional Shopping Center 170 0.00
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 386 0.00
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 249 0.00
City Park 0.11 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Office Park Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.02 0.60 0.00 1.00
Office Park Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
Cold storage User Defined 150 7.50 7.50 7.50 25.0
Condo/Townhouse Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
3742
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 42 / 50
Condo/Townhouse Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
Single Family Housing Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Single Family Housing Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
Strip Mall Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088< 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Strip Mall Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00
Strip Mall Walk-in refrigerators
and freezers
User Defined 150 < 0.005 7.50 7.50 20.0
Regional Shopping
Center
Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088< 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Regional Shopping
Center
Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.00 0.60 0.00 1.00
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 1.80 4.00 4.00 18.0
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
Walk-in refrigerators
and freezers
User Defined 150 < 0.005 7.50 7.50 20.0
Fast Food Restaurant
with Drive Thru
Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.00 0.60 0.00 1.00
Fast Food Restaurant
with Drive Thru
Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 1.80 4.00 4.00 18.0
Fast Food Restaurant
with Drive Thru
Walk-in refrigerators
and freezers
User Defined 150 < 0.005 7.50 7.50 20.0

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
3743
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 43 / 50

5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor

5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)

5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type
— —

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres
3744
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 44 / 50

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 2 0 0 N/A
3745
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 45 / 50
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A
Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality 0 0 0 N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
3746
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 46 / 50

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 84.6
AQ-PM 95.6
AQ-DPM 57.0
Drinking Water 93.3
Lead Risk Housing 7.89
Pesticides 64.8
Toxic Releases 71.4
Traffic 14.2
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 7.71
Groundwater 81.4
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 81.9
Impaired Water Bodies 43.8
Solid Waste 35.7
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 58.6
Cardio-vascular 79.3
Low Birth Weights 68.1
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 51.5
Housing 70.8
3747
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 47 / 50
Linguistic 15.6
Poverty 40.3
Unemployment 40.6

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 50.9816502
Employed 66.62389324
Median HI 72.65494675
Education —
Bachelor's or higher 43.46208136
High school enrollment 100
Preschool enrollment 17.18208649
Transportation —
Auto Access 93.63531374
Active commuting 23.14897985
Social —
2-parent households 66.79070961
Voting 49.36481458
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability 65.76414731
Park access 55.29321186
Retail density 20.00513281
Supermarket access 52.71397408
Tree canopy 13.73027076
3748
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 48 / 50
Housing—
Homeownership 73.48902862
Housing habitability 38.94520724
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 67.22699859 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 48.14577185
Uncrowded housing 46.38778391
Health Outcomes—
Insured adults 44.20633902
Arthritis 84.5
Asthma ER Admissions 52.8
High Blood Pressure 89.6
Cancer (excluding skin) 77.2
Asthma 51.9
Coronary Heart Disease 88.8
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 81.8
Diagnosed Diabetes 68.9
Life Expectancy at Birth 43.6
Cognitively Disabled 92.5
Physically Disabled 86.7
Heart Attack ER Admissions 10.7
Mental Health Not Good 52.8
Chronic Kidney Disease 85.5
Obesity 50.5
Pedestrian Injuries 19.6
Physical Health Not Good 65.0
Stroke 84.7
Health Risk Behaviors—
3749
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 49 / 50
Binge Drinking 15.4
Current Smoker 54.4
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 62.4
Climate Change Exposures —
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
Children 51.6
Elderly 87.4
English Speaking 59.0
Foreign-born 27.3
Outdoor Workers 53.0
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 70.3
Traffic Density 21.2
Traffic Access 23.0
Other Indices —
Hardship 44.7
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 55.1

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 76.0 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 53.0 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) Yes Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) No Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No 3750
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2024 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 50 / 50
a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use Acreage based on Project site plan
Operations: Vehicle Data Updated based on Project traffic study Operations: Fleet Mix Fleet mix adjusted based on Project traffic study Operations: Hearths No wood-burning stoves or fireplaces per SCAQMD Rule 445 Operations: Refrigerants As of 1 January 2022, new commercial refrigeration equipment may not use refrigerants with a GWP of 150 or greater
3751
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 1 / 50
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source
3752
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 2 / 50

4.3.2. Unmitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.2. Unmitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.2. Unmitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated 3753
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 3 / 50

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
3754
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 4 / 50

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
3755
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 5 / 50

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures

8. User Changes to Default Data
3756
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 6 / 50

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name 14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.80
Precipitation (days) 20.8
Location 34.012654365759644, -117.57100716437458
County San Bernardino-South Coast
City Ontario
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 5261
EDFZ 10
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Southern California Gas

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Office Park 317 1000sqft 7.27 316,725 0.00 — — —
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
454 1000sqft 10.4 454,244 0.00 — — —
3757
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 7 / 50
Unrefrigerated 1,996 1000sqft 45.8 1,996,180 531,432 — — — Warehouse-No Rail
User Defined
Industrial
2,767 User Defined Unit 0.00 0.00 0.00 — — —
Condo/Townhouse 3,289 Dwelling Unit 106 3,486,340 1,045,440 — 10,887 — Single Family
Housing
822 Dwelling Unit 72.5 1,602,900 631,620 — 2,721 —
Strip Mall 7.50 1000sqft 0.17 7,500 4,356 — — —
Gasoline/Service
Station

48.0 Pump 0.16 6,776 0.00 — — —
Regional Shopping
Center
162 1000sqft 3.72 162,137 109,336 — — —
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

32.4 1000sqft 0.74 32,427 0.00 — — —
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru

21.6 1000sqft 0.50 21,618 0.00 — — —
City Park 1.30 Acre 1.30 0.00 56,628 56,628 — —
Parking Lot 58.0 Acre 58.0 0.00 0.00 — — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
3758
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 8 / 50
Unmit. 289 446 348 1,925 4.95 11.8 136 148 11.7 25.2 36.9 5,170 629,697 634,867 557 36.0 1,918 661,438 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 230 389 360 1,357 4.71 11.6 136 148 11.4 25.2 36.5 5,170 606,339 611,509 558 36.3 620 636,882 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 201 367 260 1,265 3.40 6.64 100 107 6.54 18.7 25.2 5,170 437,786 442,956 551 30.6 1,016 466,884 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 36.7 66.9 47.4 231 0.62 1.21 18.3 19.5 1.19 3.41 4.60 856 72,480 73,336 91.3 5.07 168 77,298

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 232 208 247 1,514 4.31 3.76 136 140 3.54 25.2 28.7 — 450,131 450,131 25.2 31.0 1,332 461,322 Area 52.4 236 61.4 387 0.39 4.95 — 4.95 5.04 — 5.04 0.00 74,736 74,736 1.43 0.44 — 74,904 Energy 4.54 2.27 39.9 24.3 0.25 3.14 — 3.14 3.14 — 3.14 — 99,282 99,282 9.13 0.67 — 99,710 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 1,579 5,548 7,127 162 3.91 — 12,352 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 3,591 0.00 3,591 359 0.00 — 12,565 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 585 585
Total 289 446 348 1,925 4.95 11.8 136 148 11.7 25.2 36.9 5,170 629,697 634,867 557 36.0 1,918 661,438 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 218 194 262 1,308 4.09 3.76 136 140 3.55 25.2 28.7 — 427,933 427,933 26.1 31.5 34.6 438,017 3759
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 9 / 50
Area 6.78 193 58.0 24.7 0.37 4.69 — 4.69 4.69 — 4.69 0.00 73,577 73,577 1.39 0.14 — 73,653 Energy 4.54 2.27 39.9 24.3 0.25 3.14 — 3.14 3.14 — 3.14 — 99,282 99,282 9.13 0.67 — 99,710 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 1,579 5,548 7,127 162 3.91 — 12,352 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 3,591 0.00 3,591 359 0.00 — 12,565 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 585 585
Total 230 389 360 1,357 4.71 11.6 136 148 11.4 25.2 36.5 5,170 606,339 611,509 558 36.3 620 636,882 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 165 145 214 990 3.12 3.00 100 103 2.83 18.7 21.5 — 327,123 327,123 20.6 25.8 430 335,770 Area 31.7 219 6.31 250 0.04 0.50 — 0.50 0.56 — 0.56 0.00 5,834 5,834 0.13 0.22 — 5,902 Energy 4.54 2.27 39.9 24.3 0.25 3.14 — 3.14 3.14 — 3.14 — 99,282 99,282 9.13 0.67 — 99,710 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 1,579 5,548 7,127 162 3.91 — 12,352 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 3,591 0.00 3,591 359 0.00 — 12,565 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 585 585
Total 201 367 260 1,265 3.40 6.64 100 107 6.54 18.7 25.2 5,170 437,786 442,956 551 30.6 1,016 466,884 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 30.0 26.5 39.0 181 0.57 0.55 18.3 18.8 0.52 3.41 3.92 — 54,159 54,159 3.41 4.28 71.3 55,591 Area 5.79 40.0 1.15 45.6 0.01 0.09 — 0.09 0.10 — 0.10 0.00 966 966 0.02 0.04 — 977 Energy 0.83 0.41 7.28 4.44 0.05 0.57 — 0.57 0.57 — 0.57 — 16,437 16,437 1.51 0.11 — 16,508 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 261 918 1,180 26.9 0.65 — 2,045 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 595 0.00 595 59.4 0.00 — 2,080 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 96.9 96.9
Total 36.7 66.9 47.4 231 0.62 1.21 18.3 19.5 1.19 3.41 4.60 856 72,480 73,336 91.3 5.07 168 77,298

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use
3760
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 10 / 50

3.09 2.89 1.27 25.1 0.05 0.02 0.26 0.28 0.02 0.08 0.10 — 5,338 5,338 0.21 0.14 15.6 5,401 Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail

1.96 1.84 0.81 15.9 0.03 0.01 0.17 0.18 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 3,391 3,391 0.13 0.09 9.90 3,431 Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

15.4 14.4 6.33 125 0.26 0.12 1.30 1.42 0.11 0.39 0.50 — 26,602 26,602 1.06 0.70 77.7 26,916 User
Defined
Industrial

9.99 2.27 101 59.2 0.88 1.52 8.23 9.75 1.46 2.67 4.12 — 98,266 98,266 7.46 14.8 259 103,113 Condo/T
ownhous
e

70.4 64.8 50.1 472 1.15 0.77 6.70 7.47 0.72 2.07 2.80 — 117,821 117,821 5.86 5.58 362 119,994 Single
Family
Housing

29.5 27.2 21.0 198 0.48 0.32 2.81 3.13 0.30 0.87 1.17 — 49,416 49,416 2.46 2.34 152 50,327 Strip Mall 1.28 1.17 0.95 9.07 0.02 0.01 0.13 0.15 0.01 0.04 0.05 — 2,303 2,303 0.11 0.11 7.10 2,344 Gasoline
/Service
Station

16.1 14.7 12.0 114 0.28 0.19 1.65 1.84 0.18 0.51 0.69 — 28,986 28,986 1.39 1.35 89.4 29,512 Regional
Shopping
Center

45.5 42.9 24.7 217 0.46 0.33 2.64 2.97 0.31 0.82 1.12 — 47,534 47,534 3.14 2.61 143 48,533 3761
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 11 / 50
High
Turnover
(Sit Down
Restaurant)

10.9 9.96 8.12 77.3 0.19 0.13 1.12 1.25 0.12 0.35 0.47 — 19,617 19,617 0.94 0.91 60.5 19,973 Fast
Food
Restaurant
with Drive
Thru

28.2 25.8 21.0 200 0.49 0.33 2.90 3.23 0.31 0.90 1.21 — 50,835 50,835 2.43 2.36 157 51,757 City Park 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 19.9 19.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 20.2 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 232 208 247 1,514 4.31 3.76 27.9 31.7 3.54 8.75 12.3 — 450,131 450,131 25.2 31.0 1,332 461,322 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Office
Park

2.94 2.74 1.40 21.1 0.05 0.02 0.26 0.28 0.02 0.08 0.10 — 4,922 4,922 0.23 0.15 0.40 4,973 Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail

1.87 1.74 0.89 13.4 0.03 0.01 0.17 0.18 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 3,127 3,127 0.14 0.10 0.26 3,159 Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

14.7 13.7 6.99 105 0.24 0.12 1.30 1.42 0.11 0.39 0.50 — 24,525 24,525 1.13 0.75 2.01 24,780 User
Defined
Industrial

9.91 2.20 105 59.3 0.88 1.52 8.23 9.75 1.46 2.67 4.12 — 98,288 98,288 7.46 14.8 6.71 102,886 Condo/T
ownhous
e

66.0 60.3 53.7 404 1.08 0.77 6.70 7.47 0.72 2.07 2.80 — 110,555 110,555 6.14 5.76 9.39 112,435 Single
Family
Housing

27.7 25.3 22.5 169 0.45 0.32 2.81 3.13 0.30 0.87 1.17 — 46,368 46,368 2.58 2.42 3.94 47,157 3762
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 12 / 50
Strip Mall 1.20 1.09 1.02 7.70 0.02 0.01 0.13 0.15 0.01 0.04 0.05 — 2,160 2,160 0.11 0.11 0.18 2,196 Gasoline
/Service
Station

15.1 13.7 12.9 97.0 0.26 0.19 1.65 1.84 0.18 0.51 0.69 — 27,193 27,193 1.45 1.39 2.32 27,646 Regional
Shopping
Center

42.5 39.7 26.4 196 0.43 0.33 2.64 2.97 0.31 0.82 1.12 — 44,685 44,685 3.35 2.69 3.70 45,575 High
Turnover
(Sit Down
Restaurant)

10.2 9.28 8.70 65.6 0.18 0.13 1.12 1.25 0.12 0.35 0.47 — 18,403 18,403 0.98 0.94 1.57 18,710 Fast
Food
Restaurant
with Drive
Thru

26.4 24.0 22.6 170 0.46 0.33 2.90 3.23 0.31 0.90 1.21 — 47,689 47,689 2.54 2.44 4.06 48,483 City Park 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 18.6 18.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 18.9 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 218 194 262 1,308 4.09 3.76 27.9 31.7 3.55 8.75 12.3 — 427,933 427,933 26.1 31.5 34.6 438,017 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Office
Park

0.47 0.43 0.23 3.49 0.01 < 0.005 0.04 0.05 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 — 722 722 0.03 0.02 0.97 730 Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.29 0.27 0.15 2.21 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 458 458 0.02 0.01 0.62 463 Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

2.53 2.35 1.25 18.9 0.04 0.02 0.23 0.25 0.02 0.07 0.09 — 3,921 3,921 0.18 0.12 5.29 3,967 User
Defined
Industrial

1.70 0.38 18.2 10.1 0.15 0.26 1.41 1.67 0.25 0.46 0.71 — 15,286 15,286 1.16 2.30 17.4 16,017 3763
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 13 / 50
Condo/T 10.4 9.51 8.66 66.4 0.17 0.12 1.07 1.19 0.11 0.33 0.44 — 16,118 16,118 0.89 0.84 22.6 16,412 Single
Family
Housing

4.92 4.49 4.09 31.4 0.08 0.06 0.50 0.56 0.05 0.16 0.21 — 7,611 7,611 0.42 0.40 10.7 7,750 Strip Mall 0.18 0.17 0.16 1.24 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 307 307 0.02 0.02 0.43 312 Gasoline
/Service
Station

1.75 1.63 1.16 8.82 0.02 0.01 0.12 0.14 0.01 0.04 0.05 — 1,862 1,862 0.13 0.11 2.56 1,900 Regional
Shopping
Center

3.95 3.70 2.44 18.4 0.04 0.03 0.24 0.26 0.03 0.07 0.10 — 3,661 3,661 0.28 0.22 4.98 3,739 High
Turnover
(Sit Down
Restaurant)

1.14 1.06 0.79 6.01 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.10 0.01 0.03 0.04 — 1,312 1,312 0.09 0.07 1.81 1,338 Fast
Food
Restaurant
with Drive
Thru

2.69 2.51 1.80 13.7 0.03 0.02 0.19 0.21 0.02 0.06 0.08 — 2,899 2,899 0.20 0.17 3.98 2,958 City Park < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.41 2.41 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.45 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 30.0 26.5 39.0 181 0.57 0.55 3.92 4.47 0.52 1.23 1.75 — 54,159 54,159 3.41 4.28 71.3 55,591

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
3764
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 14 / 50
Office
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — — 5,243 5,243 0.50 0.06 — 5,273
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 9,433 9,433 0.90 0.11 — 9,488
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 8,745 8,745 0.83 0.10 — 8,796
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Condo/T
ownhous
e
— — — — — — — — — — — — 15,125 15,125 1.44 0.17 — 15,214 Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — 5,933 5,933 0.57 0.07 — 5,967
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — 69.2 69.2 0.01 < 0.005 — 69.6 Gasoline
/Service
Station
— — — — — — — — — — — — 61.3 61.3 0.01 < 0.005 — 61.7
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — — 1,496 1,496 0.14 0.02 — 1,505
High
Turnover
(Sit Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — — 1,079 1,079 0.10 0.01 — 1,085
Fast
Food
Restaurant
with Drive
Thru
— — — — — — — — — — — — 719 719 0.07 0.01 — 723
3765
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 15 / 50
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 2,099 2,099 0.20 0.02 — 2,111
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 50,002 50,002 4.77 0.58 — 50,294 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Office
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — — 5,243 5,243 0.50 0.06 — 5,273
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 9,433 9,433 0.90 0.11 — 9,488
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 8,745 8,745 0.83 0.10 — 8,796
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Condo/T
ownhous
e
— — — — — — — — — — — — 15,125 15,125 1.44 0.17 — 15,214 Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — 5,933 5,933 0.57 0.07 — 5,967
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — 69.2 69.2 0.01 < 0.005 — 69.6 Gasoline
/Service
Station
— — — — — — — — — — — — 61.3 61.3 0.01 < 0.005 — 61.7
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — — 1,496 1,496 0.14 0.02 — 1,505
3766
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 16 / 50
High — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,079 1,079 0.10 0.01 — 1,085 Turnover
(Sit
Down
Restaurant)
Fast
Food
Restaurant
with Drive
Thru
— — — — — — — — — — — — 719 719 0.07 0.01 — 723
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 2,099 2,099 0.20 0.02 — 2,111
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 50,002 50,002 4.77 0.58 — 50,294 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Office
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — — 868 868 0.08 0.01 — 873
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 1,562 1,562 0.15 0.02 — 1,571
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 1,448 1,448 0.14 0.02 — 1,456
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Condo/T
ownhous
e
— — — — — — — — — — — — 2,504 2,504 0.24 0.03 — 2,519
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — 982 982 0.09 0.01 — 988
3767
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 17 / 50
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — 11.5 11.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.5 Gasoline
/Service
Station
— — — — — — — — — — — — 10.1 10.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.2 Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — — 248 248 0.02 < 0.005 — 249
High
Turnover
(Sit Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — — 179 179 0.02 < 0.005 — 180
Fast
Food
Restaurant
with Drive
Thru
— — — — — — — — — — — — 119 119 0.01 < 0.005 — 120
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 348 348 0.03 < 0.005 — 350
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 8,278 8,278 0.79 0.10 — 8,327

0.26 0.13 2.33 1.96 0.01 0.18 — 0.18 0.18 — 0.18 — 2,785 2,785 0.25 0.01 — 2,793 Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.35 0.18 3.21 2.70 0.02 0.24 — 0.24 0.24 — 0.24 — 3,835 3,835 0.34 0.01 — 3,846 3768
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 18 / 50
Unrefrige
Warehouse-No
Rail

1.12 0.56 10.2 8.56 0.06 0.77 — 0.77 0.77 — 0.77 — 12,162 12,162 1.08 0.02 — 12,196 User
Defined
Industrial

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Condo/T
ownhous
e

1.83 0.92 15.6 6.66 0.10 1.27 — 1.27 1.27 — 1.27 — 19,861 19,861 1.76 0.04 — 19,916 Single
Family
Housing

0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 93.1 93.1 0.01 < 0.005 — 93.4 Regional
Shopping
Center

0.03 0.01 0.26 0.22 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 306 306 0.03 < 0.005 — 307 High
Turnover
(Sit Down
Restaurant)

0.11 0.05 1.00 0.84 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 1,188 1,188 0.11 < 0.005 — 1,191 Fast
Food
Restaurant
with Drive
Thru

0.07 0.04 0.66 0.56 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 792 792 0.07 < 0.005 — 794 City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 4.54 2.27 39.9 24.3 0.25 3.14 — 3.14 3.14 — 3.14 — 49,280 49,280 4.36 0.09 — 49,416 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
3769
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 19 / 50
Office 0.26 0.13 2.33 1.96 0.01 0.18 — 0.18 0.18 — 0.18 — 2,785 2,785 0.25 0.01 — 2,793 Park
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.35 0.18 3.21 2.70 0.02 0.24 — 0.24 0.24 — 0.24 — 3,835 3,835 0.34 0.01 — 3,846 Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

1.12 0.56 10.2 8.56 0.06 0.77 — 0.77 0.77 — 0.77 — 12,162 12,162 1.08 0.02 — 12,196 User
Defined
Industrial

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Condo/T
ownhous
e

1.83 0.92 15.6 6.66 0.10 1.27 — 1.27 1.27 — 1.27 — 19,861 19,861 1.76 0.04 — 19,916 Single
Family
Housing

0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 93.1 93.1 0.01 < 0.005 — 93.4 Regional
Shopping
Center

0.03 0.01 0.26 0.22 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 306 306 0.03 < 0.005 — 307 High
Turnover
(Sit Down
Restaurant)

0.11 0.05 1.00 0.84 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 1,188 1,188 0.11 < 0.005 — 1,191 Fast
Food
Restaurant
with Drive
Thru

0.07 0.04 0.66 0.56 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 792 792 0.07 < 0.005 — 794 3770
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 20 / 50
City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Parking
Lot

0.05 0.02 0.43 0.36 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 461 461 0.04 < 0.005 — 462 Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.06 0.03 0.59 0.49 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 635 635 0.06 < 0.005 — 637 Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.20 0.10 1.86 1.56 0.01 0.14 — 0.14 0.14 — 0.14 — 2,014 2,014 0.18 < 0.005 — 2,019 User
Defined
Industrial

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Condo/T
ownhous
e

0.33 0.17 2.86 1.22 0.02 0.23 — 0.23 0.23 — 0.23 — 3,288 3,288 0.29 0.01 — 3,297 Single
Family
Housing

0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 50.7 50.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 50.9 3771
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 21 / 50
High 0.02 0.01 0.18 0.15 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 197 197 0.02 < 0.005 — 197 Turnover
(Sit Down
Restaurant)
Fast
Food
Restaurant
with Drive
Thru

0.01 0.01 0.12 0.10 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 131 131 0.01 < 0.005 — 131 City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.83 0.41 7.28 4.44 0.05 0.57 — 0.57 0.57 — 0.57 — 8,159 8,159 0.72 0.02 — 8,181

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

45.7 42.7 3.41 363 0.02 0.27 — 0.27 0.35 — 0.35 — 1,160 1,160 0.05 0.30 — 1,251 Total 52.4 236 61.4 387 0.39 4.95 — 4.95 5.04 — 5.04 0.00 74,736 74,736 1.43 0.44 — 74,904 3772
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 22 / 50
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 6.78 3.39 58.0 24.7 0.37 4.69 — 4.69 4.69 — 4.69 0.00 73,577 73,577 1.39 0.14 — 73,653 Consum
er
Products
— 173 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 16.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total 6.78 193 58.0 24.7 0.37 4.69 — 4.69 4.69 — 4.69 0.00 73,577 73,577 1.39 0.14 — 73,653 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.08 0.04 0.72 0.31 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.06 — 0.06 0.00 834 834 0.02 < 0.005 — 835 Consum
er
Products
— 31.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 3.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

5.71 5.34 0.43 45.3 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.04 — 0.04 — 132 132 0.01 0.03 — 142 Total 5.79 40.0 1.15 45.6 0.01 0.09 — 0.09 0.10 — 0.10 0.00 966 966 0.02 0.04 — 977

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e 3773
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 23 / 50
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Office
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — 108 363 471 11.1 0.27 — 828
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 201 678 880 20.7 0.50 — 1,546
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 885 3,023 3,908 91.0 2.19 — 6,835 User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Condo/T
ownhous
e
— — — — — — — — — — — 263 988 1,251 27.0 0.65 — 2,121
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 65.7 284 349 6.76 0.16 — 567
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — 1.06 3.94 5.00 0.11 < 0.005 — 8.53 Gasoline
/Service
Station
— — — — — — — — — — — 1.22 4.12 5.34 0.13 < 0.005 — 9.38 Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — 23.0 86.4 109 2.37 0.06 — 186
High
Turnover
(Sit Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — 18.9 63.6 82.4 1.94 0.05 — 145
3774
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 24 / 50
Fast — — — — — — — — — — — 12.6 42.4 54.9 1.29 0.03 — 96.5 Food
Restaurant
with
Drive
Thru
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 10.2 10.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.2 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 1,579 5,548 7,127 162 3.91 — 12,352 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Office
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — 108 363 471 11.1 0.27 — 828
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 201 678 880 20.7 0.50 — 1,546
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 885 3,023 3,908 91.0 2.19 — 6,835 User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Condo/T
ownhous
e
— — — — — — — — — — — 263 988 1,251 27.0 0.65 — 2,121
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 65.7 284 349 6.76 0.16 — 567
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — 1.06 3.94 5.00 0.11 < 0.005 — 8.53 3775
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 25 / 50
Gasoline — — — — — — — — — — — 1.22 4.12 5.34 0.13 < 0.005 — 9.38 /Service
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — 23.0 86.4 109 2.37 0.06 — 186
High
Turnover
(Sit Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — 18.9 63.6 82.4 1.94 0.05 — 145
Fast
Food
Restaurant
with Drive
Thru
— — — — — — — — — — — 12.6 42.4 54.9 1.29 0.03 — 96.5
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 10.2 10.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.2 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 1,579 5,548 7,127 162 3.91 — 12,352 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Office
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — 17.9 60.2 78.0 1.84 0.04 — 137
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 33.3 112 146 3.43 0.08 — 256
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 146 501 647 15.1 0.36 — 1,132
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
3776
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 26 / 50
Condo/T — — — — — — — — — — — 43.5 164 207 4.48 0.11 — 351 ownhous
e
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 10.9 47.0 57.8 1.12 0.03 — 93.9
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — 0.18 0.65 0.83 0.02 < 0.005 — 1.41 Gasoline
/Service
Station
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.20 0.68 0.88 0.02 < 0.005 — 1.55 Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — 3.81 14.3 18.1 0.39 0.01 — 30.7
High
Turnover
(Sit Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — 3.12 10.5 13.6 0.32 0.01 — 24.0
Fast
Food
Restaurant
with Drive
Thru
— — — — — — — — — — — 2.08 7.01 9.10 0.21 0.01 — 16.0
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 1.68 1.68 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.69 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 261 918 1,180 26.9 0.65 — 2,045

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e 3777
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 27 / 50
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Office
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — 159 0.00 159 15.9 0.00 — 555
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 230 0.00 230 23.0 0.00 — 805
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 1,011 0.00 1,011 101 0.00 — 3,538 User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Condo/T
ownhous
e
— — — — — — — — — — — 1,311 0.00 1,311 131 0.00 — 4,586 Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 428 0.00 428 42.8 0.00 — 1,498
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — 4.24 0.00 4.24 0.42 0.00 — 14.8 Gasoline
/Service
Station
— — — — — — — — — — — 13.9 0.00 13.9 1.39 0.00 — 48.8
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — 91.8 0.00 91.8 9.17 0.00 — 321
High
Turnover
(Sit Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — 208 0.00 208 20.8 0.00 — 728
3778
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 28 / 50
Fast — — — — — — — — — — — 134 0.00 134 13.4 0.00 — 470 Food
Restaurant
with
Drive
Thru
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — 0.06 0.00 0.06 0.01 0.00 — 0.21 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 3,591 0.00 3,591 359 0.00 — 12,565 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Office
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — 159 0.00 159 15.9 0.00 — 555
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 230 0.00 230 23.0 0.00 — 805
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 1,011 0.00 1,011 101 0.00 — 3,538 User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Condo/T
ownhous
e
— — — — — — — — — — — 1,311 0.00 1,311 131 0.00 — 4,586 Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 428 0.00 428 42.8 0.00 — 1,498
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — 4.24 0.00 4.24 0.42 0.00 — 14.8 3779
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 29 / 50
Gasoline — — — — — — — — — — — 13.9 0.00 13.9 1.39 0.00 — 48.8 /Service
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — 91.8 0.00 91.8 9.17 0.00 — 321
High
Turnover
(Sit Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — 208 0.00 208 20.8 0.00 — 728
Fast
Food
Restaurant
with Drive
Thru
— — — — — — — — — — — 134 0.00 134 13.4 0.00 — 470
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — 0.06 0.00 0.06 0.01 0.00 — 0.21 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 3,591 0.00 3,591 359 0.00 — 12,565 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Office
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — 26.3 0.00 26.3 2.63 0.00 — 92.0
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 38.1 0.00 38.1 3.81 0.00 — 133
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 167 0.00 167 16.7 0.00 — 586
User
Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
3780
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 30 / 50
Condo/T — — — — — — — — — — — 217 0.00 217 21.7 0.00 — 759 ownhous
e
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 70.9 0.00 70.9 7.08 0.00 — 248
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — 0.70 0.00 0.70 0.07 0.00 — 2.46 Gasoline
/Service
Station
— — — — — — — — — — — 2.31 0.00 2.31 0.23 0.00 — 8.08
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — 15.2 0.00 15.2 1.52 0.00 — 53.1
High
Turnover
(Sit Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — 34.4 0.00 34.4 3.44 0.00 — 120
Fast
Food
Restaurant
with Drive
Thru
— — — — — — — — — — — 22.2 0.00 22.2 2.22 0.00 — 77.7
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — 0.01 0.00 0.01 < 0.005 0.00 — 0.03 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 595 0.00 595 59.4 0.00 — 2,080

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e 3781
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 31 / 50
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Office
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.77 0.77
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 463 463
Condo/T
ownhous
e
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 25.0 25.0
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 11.5 11.5
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.04 0.04
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.78 0.78
High
Turnover
(Sit Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 50.6 50.6
Fast
Food
Restaurant
with Drive
Thru
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 33.8 33.8
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 585 585
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Office
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.77 0.77
3782
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 32 / 50
Refrigera — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 463 463
ted
Condo/T
ownhous
e
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 25.0 25.0
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 11.5 11.5
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.04 0.04
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.78 0.78
High
Turnover
(Sit Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 50.6 50.6
Fast
Food
Restaurant
with Drive
Thru
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 33.8 33.8
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 585 585
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Office
Park
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.13 0.13
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 76.7 76.7
Condo/T
ownhous
e
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.13 4.13
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.90 1.90
3783
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 33 / 50
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.01 0.01
Regional
Shopping
Center
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.13 0.13
High
Turnover
(Sit Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 8.39 8.39
Fast
Food
Restaurant
with Drive
Thru
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.59 5.59
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 96.9 96.9

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
3784
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 34 / 50

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
3785
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 35 / 50
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
3786
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 36 / 50
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
3787
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 37 / 50
Remove — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
d
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Office Park 888 669 327 283,479 7,525 5,670 2,769 2,401,918 Refrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
564 319 306 179,702 4,780 2,706 2,594 1,522,619
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
4,426 3,725 3,675 1,539,648 37,498 31,561 31,138 13,045,437 User Defined
Industrial
1,143 927 874 391,883 35,782 29,024 27,378 12,269,872
Condo/Townhouse 18,580 11,370 9,101 5,911,360 142,672 87,311 69,884 45,393,329 3788
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 38 / 50
Single Family 7,755 7,793 6,971 2,791,565 59,549 59,839 53,527 21,436,426 Housing
Strip Mall 330 237 75.2 102,332 2,796 2,011 637 867,056 Gasoline/Service
Station
2,496 4,154 4,154 1,083,962 5,649 35,198 35,198 5,143,326 Regional Shopping
Center
5,320 13,204 8,133 2,499,577 20,262 56,219 34,626 10,019,460 High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
1,662 2,155 2,811 692,267 5,554 18,260 23,821 3,642,197 Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
4,074 7,285 4,182 1,660,093 11,305 61,729 35,436 8,013,735 City Park 2.00 2.55 2.85 803 16.9 21.6 24.1 6,800
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
Hearth Type Unmitigated (number)
Condo/Townhouse —
Wood Fireplaces 0
Gas Fireplaces 2796
Propane Fireplaces 0
Electric Fireplaces 0
No Fireplaces 329
Single Family Housing —
Wood Fireplaces 0
Gas Fireplaces 699
3789
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 39 / 50
Propane Fireplaces 0
Electric Fireplaces 0
No Fireplaces 82

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 250

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Office Park 5,527,449 346 0.0330 0.0040 8,690,939
Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 9,945,872 346 0.0330 0.0040 11,966,710 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail
9,219,763 346 0.0330 0.0040 37,948,738
User Defined Industrial 0.00 346 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Condo/Townhouse 15,946,932 346 0.0330 0.0040 61,972,315 Single Family Housing 6,255,109 346 0.0330 0.0040 25,720,146 Strip Mall 72,963 346 0.0330 0.0040 44,216
3790
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 40 / 50
Gasoline/Service Station 64,628 346 0.0330 0.0040 290,596 Regional Shopping Center 1,577,323 346 0.0330 0.0040 955,877 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
1,137,107 346 0.0330 0.0040 3,705,461
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive
Thru
758,071 346 0.0330 0.0040 2,470,307
City Park 0.00 346 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Parking Lot 2,213,196 346 0.0330 0.0040 0.00

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.13. Operational Waste Generation
3791
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 41 / 50

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Office Park Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.02 0.60 0.00 1.00
Office Park Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
Cold storage User Defined 150 7.50 7.50 7.50 25.0
Condo/Townhouse Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
3792
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 42 / 50
Condo/Townhouse Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
Single Family Housing Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Single Family Housing Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
Strip Mall Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088< 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Strip Mall Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00
Strip Mall Walk-in refrigerators
and freezers
User Defined 150 < 0.005 7.50 7.50 20.0
Regional Shopping
Center
Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088< 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Regional Shopping
Center
Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.00 0.60 0.00 1.00
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 1.80 4.00 4.00 18.0
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
Walk-in refrigerators
and freezers
User Defined 150 < 0.005 7.50 7.50 20.0
Fast Food Restaurant
with Drive Thru
Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.00 0.60 0.00 1.00
Fast Food Restaurant
with Drive Thru
Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 1.80 4.00 4.00 18.0
Fast Food Restaurant
with Drive Thru
Walk-in refrigerators
and freezers
User Defined 150 < 0.005 7.50 7.50 20.0

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
3793
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 43 / 50

5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor

5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)

5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type
— —

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres
3794
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 44 / 50

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 2 0 0 N/A
3795
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 45 / 50
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A
Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality 0 0 0 N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
3796
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 46 / 50

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 84.6
AQ-PM 95.6
AQ-DPM 57.0
Drinking Water 93.3
Lead Risk Housing 7.89
Pesticides 64.8
Toxic Releases 71.4
Traffic 14.2
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 7.71
Groundwater 81.4
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 81.9
Impaired Water Bodies 43.8
Solid Waste 35.7
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 58.6
Cardio-vascular 79.3
Low Birth Weights 68.1
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 51.5
Housing 70.8
3797
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 47 / 50
Linguistic 15.6
Poverty 40.3
Unemployment 40.6

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 50.9816502
Employed 66.62389324
Median HI 72.65494675
Education —
Bachelor's or higher 43.46208136
High school enrollment 100
Preschool enrollment 17.18208649
Transportation —
Auto Access 93.63531374
Active commuting 23.14897985
Social —
2-parent households 66.79070961
Voting 49.36481458
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability 65.76414731
Park access 55.29321186
Retail density 20.00513281
Supermarket access 52.71397408
Tree canopy 13.73027076
3798
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 48 / 50
Housing—
Homeownership 73.48902862
Housing habitability 38.94520724
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 67.22699859 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 48.14577185
Uncrowded housing 46.38778391
Health Outcomes—
Insured adults 44.20633902
Arthritis 84.5
Asthma ER Admissions 52.8
High Blood Pressure 89.6
Cancer (excluding skin) 77.2
Asthma 51.9
Coronary Heart Disease 88.8
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 81.8
Diagnosed Diabetes 68.9
Life Expectancy at Birth 43.6
Cognitively Disabled 92.5
Physically Disabled 86.7
Heart Attack ER Admissions 10.7
Mental Health Not Good 52.8
Chronic Kidney Disease 85.5
Obesity 50.5
Pedestrian Injuries 19.6
Physical Health Not Good 65.0
Stroke 84.7
Health Risk Behaviors—
3799
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 49 / 50
Binge Drinking 15.4
Current Smoker 54.4
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 62.4
Climate Change Exposures —
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
Children 51.6
Elderly 87.4
English Speaking 59.0
Foreign-born 27.3
Outdoor Workers 53.0
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 70.3
Traffic Density 21.2
Traffic Access 23.0
Other Indices —
Hardship 44.7
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 55.1

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 76.0 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 53.0 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) Yes Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) No Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No 3800
14822 Rich Haven Ph1 Ops 2027 Detailed Report, 10/12/2022 50 / 50
a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use Acreage based on Project site plan
Operations: Vehicle Data Updated based on Project traffic study Operations: Fleet Mix Fleet mix adjusted based on Project traffic study Operations: Hearths No wood-burning stoves or fireplaces per SCAQMD Rule 445 Operations: Refrigerants As of 1 January 2022, new commercial refrigeration equipment may not use refrigerants with a GWP of 150 or greater
3801
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Ops Detailed Report, 10/12/2022
1 / 41
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Ops Detailed Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source
3802
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Ops Detailed Report, 10/12/2022
2 / 41

4.3.2. Unmitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.2. Unmitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.2. Unmitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated 3803
14822 Rich Haven Ph2 Ops Detailed Report, 10/12/2022
3 / 41

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

Ontario City CouncilJune 20, 2023

Ontario City Council
June 20, 2023