15662-04 TG Letter
EXHIBIT 1: PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
3384
Dave Waters, Genstar Development Company/GDCI-13
May 29, 2024
15662-04 TG Letter
EXHIBIT 2: CURRENTLY APPROVED LAND USE PLAN
3385
Dave Waters, Genstar Development Company/GDCI-13
May 29, 2024
15662-04 TG Letter
TRIP GENERATION
Trip generation represents the amount of traffic, which is both attracted to, and produced by, a development. Determining traffic generation for a specific project is therefore based upon forecasting the amount of traffic that is expected to be both attracted to, and produced by, the specific land uses being proposed for a given development.
APPROVED SPECIFIC PLAN
As noted previously, the site is located within the Esperanza Specific Plan. Specifically, the Project is located within Planning Area 11, which was approved with a 736-student elementary school.
The Esperanza Specific Plan Traffic Impact Study Report (prepared by Albert A. Webb Associates, dated November 10, 2005, referred to as 2005 Traffic Study) evaluated the 736-student elementary school within Planning Area 11. The trip generation is summarized in Table 1 and excerpts from the 2005 Traffic Study are included in Attachment A. The approved elementary school site is anticipated to generate an average of 949 two-way trips per day, with 309 trips during the AM peak hour and 206 trips during the PM peak hour.
TABLE 1: APPROVED SP TRIP GENERATION FOR PLANNING AREA 11
PROPOSED PROJECT
The proposed Project consists of 161 multi-family (low-rise) residential dwelling units. In order to develop the traffic characteristics of the proposed Project, trip-generation statistics published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition, 2021) were used for the Project. Table 2 summarizes the trip generation rates for Multifamily (Low-Rise) Residential (ITE Code 220).
The trip generation summary illustrating daily, and peak hour trip generation estimates for the proposed Project are also summarized in Table 2. The proposed Project is anticipated to generate 944 vehicle trip-ends per day with 108 AM peak hour trips and 125 PM peak hour trips.
Land Use Quantity Units1 In Out Total In Out Total Daily PA 11: Elementary School 736 STU 169 140 309 96 110 206 949 Source: Esperanza Specific Plan Traffic Impact Study Report (prepared by Albert A. Webb Associates, dated November 10, 2005). 1 STU = Students
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
3386
Dave Waters, Genstar Development Company/GDCI-13
May 29, 2024
15662-04 TG Letter
TABLE 2: PROPOSED PROJECT TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY
TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON
Table 3 shows the trip generation comparison between the approved use (elementary school) and proposed Project (multi-family residential) and identifies the resulting net change in trips. As shown, the Project is anticipated to generate a net reduction of 5 two-way trips per day with a reduction of 201 AM peak hour trips and 81 fewer PM peak hour trips as compared to the approved elementary school use.
TABLE 3: TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON
FINDINGS
The City of Ontario adheres to the County Guidelines, which have been used to determine whether additional traffic analysis is necessary for the proposed Project. The County Guidelines indicate that development projects that generate a net increase of 100 or more peak hour vehicle trips (without pass-by reductions) would require the preparation and submittal of a Transportation Impact Analysis.
The Project is anticipated to generate fewer than 100 net new peak hour trips during the morning and evening peak hours (Project results in a net reduction from the currently approved land use).
The Project would therefore contribute fewer than 50 net new peak hour trips to any off-site intersection. As such, additional peak hour traffic operations analysis is not necessary based on the County Guidelines.
If you have any questions or comments, I can be reached at [email protected].
ITE LU AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Land Use1 Units2 Code In Out Total In Out Total
Multifamily (Low-Rise) Residential DU 220 0.17 0.50 0.67 0.45 0.33 0.78 5.86 1 Trip Generation Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition (2021). 2 DU = dwelling units
Land Use Quantity Units1 In Out Total In Out Total Daily PA 11: Esperanza Multi-Family 161 DU 27 81 108 72 53 125 944 1 DU = dwelling units
Daily
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Project In Out Total In Out Total Daily
Esperanza SP: Elementary School 169 140 309 96 110 206 949 Proposed Project: Multifamily Residential 27 81 108 72 53 125 944 Net Change in Trips -142 -59 -201 -24 -57 -81 -5
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
3387
15662-04 TG Letter
ATTACHMENT A: ESPERANZA SPECIFIC PLAN
TRIP GENERATION EXCERPTS
3388
3389
3390
DATE: May 29, 2024
TO: Dave Waters, Genstar Development Company/GDCI-13
FROM: Alex So, Urban Crossroads, Inc.
JOB NO: 15662-03 VMT
PA-11 OF THE ESPERANZA SPECIFIC PLAN VEHICLE MILES
TRAVELED (VMT) ANALYSIS
Urban Crossroads, Inc. is pleased to provide the following Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis for PA-11 of The Esperanza Specific Plan (Project), located on the northeast corner of Amherst Avenue and Eucalyptus Avenue in the City of Ontario.
PROJECT OVERVIEW
It is our understanding that the Project proposes a General Plan Amendment to change the land use from Public School to Medium Density Residential (MDR 11.1- 24 du/ac) and an amendment to the Esperanza Specific Plan to change the land use designation for Planning Area 11 from Public School to Residential Development 9 (RD-9). More specifically the proposes 161 multi-family (townhome) residential dwelling units with a density of approximately 16.1 dwelling units to the net acre that would replace a 736-student elementary school. A preliminary site plan can be found in Attachment A.
BACKGROUND
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) mandates that all lead agencies use VMT as the measure for identifying transportation impacts in land use projects.
In June 2020, the City of Ontario developed and adopted its VMT methodologies and thresholds (Resolution No. 2020-071) (City Guidelines) (1). This VMT analysis is based on the adopted City Guidelines.
VMT ANALYSIS
TRAFFIC MODELING METHODOLOGY
Consistent with City Guidelines, a project-level VMT analysis shall be conducted using the San Bernardino Traffic Analysis Model (SBTAM) as the appropriate tool for conducting VMT analysis for land use projects within the City of Ontario. SBTAM is a useful tool to estimate VMT as it considers interaction between different land uses based on socio-economic data such as population, households, and employment.
3391
Dave Waters, Genstar Development Company/GDCI-13
May 29, 2024
15662-03 VMT
As part of The Ontario Plan (TOP) 2050 implementation, the City of Ontario recently adopted an updated version of SBTAM, also referred to as the TOP model. This updated version includes the latest roadway network and socio-economic data specific to the City of Ontario, in alignment with the City's recently-adopted TOP. The model encompasses a base year of 2019 and a General Plan Buildout projection for 2050.
VMT ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY
As stated within the City’s Guidelines, the analysis should include ‘project-generated VMT’ and ‘project effect on VMT’ estimates for the project transportation/traffic analysis zone (TAZ) for baseline and cumulative conditions. For the purposes of this analysis, Project VMT estimates have been prepared using the Origin/Destination (OD) method to estimate project-generated VMT and Boundary method to estimate project effect on VMT. VMT has been presented as total VMT and total VMT per service population (i.e., population and employees).
ORIGIN/DESTINATION (OD) VMT
The OD method for calculating VMT sums all weekday VMT generated by trips with at least one trip-end in the study area (i.e., Project boundary or City boundary) and tracks those trips to their origin or destination. Origins are all vehicle trips that start in a specific TAZ, while destinations are all vehicle trips that end in a specific TAZ. The OD method accounts for all trips (i.e., both passenger cars and trucks) and trip purposes (i.e., total VMT).
BOUNDARY VMT METHOD
The boundary method is the sum of all weekday VMT on the roadway network within a designated boundary (i.e., City boundary or other designated geographic area). The boundary method estimates VMT by multiplying vehicle trips on each roadway segment within the boundary by that segment’s length. This approach consists of all trips, including those trips that do not begin or end in the designated boundary. Consistent with City VMT Guidelines, the City of Ontario was used as the boundary for this assessment. In addition, as the Project is located near the southeastern edge of the City, an additional assessment of a ten-mile boundary area surrounding the Project site has also been conducted to ensure trips associated with the Project are not omitted.
VMT METRIC AND SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLD
The City of Ontario has adopted the following thresholds of significance related to VMT for land use projects:
The SBTAM model should be used to forecast total daily VMT per Service Population (SP) and is the required method for estimating VMT.
• A significant impact would occur if the project VMT per SP exceeds the Citywide average VMT per SP under General Plan Buildout Conditions.
• A significant impact would occur if the project caused total daily VMT per SP within the City to be higher than the no project scenario under cumulative conditions. 3392
Dave Waters, Genstar Development Company/GDCI-13
May 29, 2024
15662-03 VMT
The City of Ontario's average VMT per SP under General Plan Buildout conditions has been calculated using the TOP General Plan Buildout (2050) model. Table 1 presents the Citywide average VMT per SP for General Plan Buildout (2050) conditions.
TABLE 1: CITYWIDE VMT PER SERVICE POPULATION
Ontario TOP 2050
Service Population 707,369
VMT 19,506,377
VMT per SP 27.6
As shown in Table 1, the City of Ontario’s VMT per SP for General Plan Buildout (2050) conditions has been calculated as 27.6 VMT per SP.
VMT ESTIMATES
To estimate project-generated VMT, standard land use information such as the number of residential dwelling units must first be converted into a SBTAM compatible dataset. The SBTAM model utilizes socio-economic data (SED) (e.g., population, households, and employment) for the purposes of vehicle trip estimation. Table 2 summarizes the SED inputs used to represent the Project. Project SED data was then coded into the Project’s TAZ to obtain project-generated VMT.
TABLE 2: POPULATION ESTIMATES
Land Use Quantity Conversion Factor1 Estimated Population Residential 161 Dwelling Units 3.5 people per household 564
PROJECT-GENERATED VMT
Project-level VMT estimates were extracted from SBTAM using the OD trip matrices, which includes project-generated VMT for all vehicle trips (both passenger cars and trucks) and trip purposes. Project-generated VMT estimates for the Project are presented in Table 3.
TABLE 3: PROJECT-GENERATED VMT SUMMARY
Baseline General Plan Buildout
Year (2050)
SP1 564 564
OD VMT 12,582 13,364
OD VMT per SP 22.3 23.7
City Threshold 27.6 27.6
Potentially Significant? No No
1 SP = Service Population which refers to the Project’s population estimate.
As shown in Table 3, project-generated VMT is forecast to be below the City’s adopted threshold. 1 Factors obtained consistent with land use assumptions within the TOP 2050 model. 3393
Dave Waters, Genstar Development Company/GDCI-13
May 29, 2024
15662-03 VMT
PROJECT EFFECT ON VMT
The Project’s effect on VMT has been calculated using the boundary method. Land use information representing the proposed land use changes contemplated by the Project were coded into the Project TAZ to represent the “With Project” condition. Table 4 summarizes the boundary VMT under the No Project and With Project scenarios for both baseline and cumulative conditions using the City boundary and a 10-mile radius from the Project site.
TABLE 4: GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT (2050) BOUNDARY VMT RESULTS City Boundary 10-Mile Boundary
Scenario No Project With Project No Project With Project Service Population 706,494 707,058 2,579,062 2,579,626
Boundary VMT 9,602,250 9,598,040 41,605,554 41,614,834
VMT per SP 13.6 13.6 16.1 16.1
Change in VMT 0.0 0.0
Potentially Significant? No No
The boundary VMT is found to increase under the With Project scenario for both the baseline and cumulative conditions, as expected when increases in development are added to the model.
However, to measure the efficiency of a land use project or land use plan, the boundary VMT is divided by the service population to frame an efficiency metric. The resulting VMT per service population was found to remain unchanged in the With Project scenario. The Project does not result in an increase total daily VMT per SP as compared to the No Project scenario.
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC TRANSIT REVIEW
Potential impacts to:
• Circulation system
• Public transit
• Pedestrian facilities and travel
• Bicycle facilities
Were analyzed to determine if the proposed Project conflicts with adopted policies, plans, programs, and if the Project has the potential to decrease the performance or safety of such facilities.
CIRCULATION SYSTEM
Traffic is anticipated to be distributed through the City of Ontario, extending into the neighboring jurisdiction of the City of Eastvale. In general, the study area has a moderate level of active transportation facilities and transit service. Bicycle and pedestrian facilities are proposed as part of the City of Ontario and City of Eastvale General Plans on most roadways throughout the study area.
CITY OF ONTARIO GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT EVALUATION The Project site is located within the City of Ontario. Exhibit 1 shows The Ontario Plan 2050 mobility element. (2)
3394
Dave Waters, Genstar Development Company/GDCI-13
May 29, 2024
15662-03 VMT
Principal Arterials serve the major centers and corridor of activity, carry the highest volumes of traffic, and serve the longest trips of all city roadways. The study area roadways that are classified as 8-lane Principal Arterials are identified as having four lanes of travel in each direction. The following study area roadway within the City of Ontario is classified as an 8-lane Principal Arterial:
• Ontario Ranch Road
The study area roadways that are classified as 6-lane Principal Arterials are identified as having three lanes of travel in each direction. The following study area roadway within the City of Ontario is classified as a 6-lane Principal Arterial:
• Hamner Avenue
The study area roadways that are classified as 4-lane Principal Arterials are identified as having two lanes of travel in each direction. The following study area roadway within the City of Ontario is classified as a 4-lane Principal Arterial:
• Haven Avenue
Minor Arterials accommodate less traffic than Principal Arterials and are for trips of moderate length. Minor Arterials allow more access to abutting properties and connect the community. The study area roadway that is classified as a 4-lane Minor Arterial is identified as having two lanes of travel in each direction. The following study area roadway within the City of Ontario is classified as a 6-lane Minor Arterial:
• Bellegrave Avenue
Collector streets provide access to abutting properties and traffic circulation within residential neighborhoods and business areas. Collector streets allow access to local and arterial roadways.
The study area roadways that are classified as 4-lane Collector Streets are identified as having two lanes of travel in each direction. The following study area roadways within the City of Ontario are classified as 4-lane Collector Streets:
• Mill Creek Avenue
• Eucalyptus Avenue
• Merrill Avenue
CITY OF EASTVALE GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT
Exhibit 2 shows the City of Eastvale General Plan Circulation Element. (3) 3395
Dave Waters, Genstar Development Company/GDCI-13
May 29, 2024
15662-03 VMT
BICYCLE FACILITIES
There are four bicycle facility classifications recognized by the City of Ontario. The four bicycle facility classifications are as follows:
Class I Bikeways (Bike Paths)
Class I bikeways are dedicated for exclusive use by bicyclists along rivers, channels, and utility right-of-way.
Class II Bikeways (Bike Lanes)
Class II bikeways are dedicated lanes along streets, with no parking allowed in the bike lane.
Class III Bikeways (Bike Routes)
Class III bikeways are bike routes normally shared with motor vehicles on the street or with pedestrians on sidewalks, and parking is allowed.
Class IV Bikeways (Separated Bikeways)
Class IV bikeways are dedicated for exclusive use of bicycles and are physically separated from motor traffic with a vertical feature.
Many of the City of Ontario’s bicycle paths are combined with sidewalks along each side of major streets.
The City of Ontario and City of Eastvale bike networks are shown on Exhibits 3 and 4, respectively.
Adjacent to the Project site, there is a Class II bike lane along Eucalyptus Avenue. A Class I bike path is proposed along Hamner Avenue, east of the Project site. Many bicycle facilities are either existing or proposed within the study area on most major streets. As the study area builds out consistent with the City’s proposed trail and bicycle facilities, the Project will be part of a wellconnected bicycle network. 3396
Dave Waters, Genstar Development Company/GDCI-13
May 29, 2024
15662-03 VMT
PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES
Pedestrian facilities include sidewalks, crosswalks, pedestrian signals, and multi-use trails. Exhibit 5 illustrates the existing crosswalks throughout the study area. As shown in Exhibit 5, pedestrian facilities are built out along portions of Eucalyptus Avenue, Hamner Avenue, and many other study area roadways. Under the assumption that pedestrian facilities will continue to be constructed as the study area develops, the Project will be part of a safe and efficient pedestrian network. The Project is to develop the sidewalks along the roadways adjacent to the Project. 3397
Dave Waters, Genstar Development Company/GDCI-13
May 29, 2024
15662-03 VMT
PUBLIC TRANSIT REVIEW
There are bus and regional transit service options available to the City of Ontario. Limited routes and transit options are available near the Project site. It is anticipated that new routes will be proposed to support the future development, but those routes have not been identified at this time. Existing transit services and routes in the study area are shown on Exhibit 6.
Omnitrans
The study area is currently served by Omnitrans, a public transit agency serving various jurisdictions within San Bernardino County. Omnitrans provides countywide bus service and currently has five bus routes in the City of Ontario that provide connections between rail stations, Ontario International Airport (ONT), major employment and shopping centers, and residential areas. Exhibit 6 shows the existing transit facilities, which indicates that Omnitrans Route 87 could serve the Project site. Route 87 runs along portions of Hamner Avenue and Ontario Ranch Road.
The nearest bus stop is at the intersection of Hamner Avenue and Eucalyptus Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet east of the Project site. Transit service is reviewed and updated by Omnitrans periodically to address ridership, budget, and community demand needs. Changes in land use can affect these periodic adjustments which may lead to either enhanced or reduced service where appropriate. As such, it is recommended that the Applicant work in conjunction with Omnitrans to potentially provide bus service to the site.
Metrolink
Commuter train service in the City of Ontario is provided by Metrolink, which provides service throughout the Southern California region. The nearest Metrolink station is the East Ontario Metrolink station, located approximately 4 miles north of the Project site. The Riverside Line links Riverside to Union Station in downtown Los Angeles and various other destinations. This line runs weekdays during peak commute hours only.
3398
Dave Waters, Genstar Development Company/GDCI-13
May 29, 2024
15662-03 VMT
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS
This assessment addresses the following Transportation thresholds stated in CEQA Guidelines Appendix G:
T-1 Potential to conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities.
T-2 Potential to conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b) regarding policies to reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT).
T-3 Potential to substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment).
T-4 Potential to result in inadequate emergency access.
T-1 ASSESSMENT
The analysis presented here considers the degree to which the Project may hinder the safe and comfortable access to the Project site from other locations, with a special focus on people relying on transit services or active transportation modes such as biking or walking.
Applicable programs, plans, and policies addressing the circulation system are established under TOP 2050. Project consistency with applicable provisions of TOP 2050 is summarized at Table 5.
As provided for under CEQA, the analysis presented here considers program, plan, and policy inconsistencies that could result in potentially significant environmental impacts. As a matter of law, the Project would be required to comply with City ordinances addressing the study area circulation system.
TABLE 5: TOP 2050 CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS
MOBILITY ELEMENT
M-1 Roadway System
Goal M1 A system of roadways that meets the mobility needs of a dynamic and prosperous Ontario.
Policies Remarks
M-1.1 Roadway Design and Maintenance.
We require our roadways to:
• Comply with federal, state and local
design and safety standards.
• Meet the needs of multiple
transportation modes and users.
• Handle the capacity envisioned in City
of Ontario Master Plan of Streets and
Highways.
• Be maintained in accordance with
best practices.
• Be compatible with the streetscape
and surrounding land uses.
Consistent. Project roadway designs and all
proposed improvements would conform with the
City’s Master Plan of Streets and Highways, City
design standards and applicable federal/state
design and safety standards. City design review
processes would ensure compliance with all
applicable standards.
Streetscape design concepts implemented
pursuant to the Specific Plan establish compatible
continuation of existing perimeter streetscapes. All
public roadways would be maintained in
accordance with City requirements to include
implementation of City Best Management Practices
and City Right-of-Way Management Plan.
3399
Dave Waters, Genstar Development Company/GDCI-13
May 29, 2024
15662-03 VMT
TABLE 5: TOP 2050 CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS
MOBILITY ELEMENT
• Promote the efficient flow of all
modes of traffic through the
implementation of intelligent
transportation systems and travel
demand strategies.
On this basis, the Project is considered consistent
with Policy M-1.1.
M-1.2 Mitigation of Impacts. We require
development to mitigate its traffic
impacts.
Consistent. The Project would not result in
potentially significant VMT impacts. Level of Service
(LOS) deficiencies are no longer CEQA
considerations. Recommended improvements
addressing any potential LOS deficiencies would be
implemented consistent with City Conditions of
Approval.
On this basis, the Project is considered consistent
with Policy M-1.2.
M-1.3 Agency Coordination on Roadway
Improvements. We work with Caltrans,
SBCTA and others to identify, fund and
implement needed improvements to
roadways when necessary. We work with
neighboring jurisdictions to promote
regional connectivity, access, and meet
operational level of service standards at
the City limits.
Consistent. Please refer to remarks at Policies M1.1, M-1.2.
M-1.4 Complete Streets. We work to provide a
complete, balanced, context-aware,
multimodal transportation network that
meets the needs of all users of streets,
roads, and highways, including motorists,
pedestrians, bicyclists, children, persons
with disabilities, seniors, movers of
commercial goods, and users of public
transportation. We prioritize
implementation of complete streets
improvements in environmental justice
areas to facilitate opportunities for
residents to use active transportation
systems.
Consistent. The Project would construct all
circulation system improvements consistent with
applicable provisions of the Specific Plan, TOP 2050
Mobility Element, and as required under City
Conditions of Approval.
On this basis, the Project is considered consistent
with Policy M-1.4.
M-1.5 Level of Service. Maintain a peak hour
Level of Service (LOS) E or better at all
intersections. Maintain Level of Service D
or better on arterial streets in the City.
Develop and maintain a list of locations
where LOS E or LOS F are considered
acceptable and would be exempt from
this level of service policy. Considerations
for LOS exemption include being
restricted by environmental constraints,
lacking available right-of-way, deterring an
Consistent. The City recognizes that vehicle delay
(Level of Service, LOS) deficiencies are no longer
environmental impacts under CEQA.
Recommended improvements addressing any LOS
deficiencies would be implemented per City
Conditions of Approval.
On this basis, the Project is considered consistent
with Policy M-1.5.
3400
Dave Waters, Genstar Development Company/GDCI-13
May 29, 2024
15662-03 VMT
TABLE 5: TOP 2050 CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS
MOBILITY ELEMENT
increase in VMT, or degrading other
modes of travel (such as bicycle or
pedestrian infrastructure).
M-1.6 Reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled. We will
strive to reduce VMT through a
combination of land use, transportation
projects, travel demand management
strategies, and other trip reduction
measures in coordination with
development projects and public capital
improvement projects.
Consistent. While roadway improvements
associated with the Project may facilitate vehicular
travel within the City and surrounding areas, total
VMT and environmental impacts of such travel
would not result in any potentially significant VMT
and VMT-related impacts.
On this basis, the Project is considered consistent
with Policy M-1.6.
M-2 Active Transportation
Goal M-2 A system of trails and corridors that facilitate and encourage active modes of transportation.
Policies Remarks
M-2.1 Active Transportation. We maintain our
Active Transportation Master Plan to
create a comprehensive system of on- and
off-street bikeways and pedestrian
facilities that are safe, comfortable, and
accessible and connect residential areas,
businesses, schools, parks, and other key
destination points.
Consistent. Bikeways and pedestrian facilities
would be implemented consistent with provisions
of the Specific Plan and as required under City
Conditions of Approval. The Project does not
propose or require facilities or operations that
would conflict with the City’s Active Transportation
Master Plan.
On this basis, the Project is considered consistent
with Policy M-2.1.
M-2.2 Bicycle System. We provide off-street
multipurpose trails and Class II bikeways
as our preferred paths of travel and use
the Class III for connectivity in constrained
circumstances. When truck routes and
bicycle facilities share a right-of-way, we
prefer Class I or Class IV bicycle facilities.
We require new development to include
bicycle facilities, such as bicycle parking
and secure storage areas.
Consistent. Bikeways and bicycle amenities would
be implemented consistent with provisions of the
Specific Plan and as required under City Conditions
of Approval.
On this basis, the Project is considered consistent
with Policy M-2.2.
M-2.3 Pedestrian Walkways. We require
streets to include sidewalks and visible
crosswalks at major intersections where
necessary to promote safe and
comfortable mobility between residential
areas, businesses, schools, parks,
recreation areas, and other key
destination points.
Consistent. Pedestrian paths would be provided
within the Project site and along the Project
perimeter consistent with City standards, provisions
of the Specific Plan, and as required under City
Conditions of Approval.
On this basis, the Project is considered consistent
with Policy M-2.3.
3401
Dave Waters, Genstar Development Company/GDCI-13
May 29, 2024
15662-03 VMT
TABLE 5: TOP 2050 CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS
MOBILITY ELEMENT
M.2-4 Network Opportunities. We use public
rights-of-way and easements such as,
utility easements, levees, drainage
corridors, road rights-of-way, medians,
and other potential options to maintain
and expand our bicycle and pedestrian
network. In urban, mixed-use, and transitoriented Place Types, we encourage the use of underutilized public and private
spaces to expand our public realm and
improve pedestrian and bicycle
connectivity.
Consistent. Bikeways and pedestrian facilities
would be implemented consistent with provisions
of the Specific Plan and as required under City
Conditions of Approval.
On this basis, the Project is considered consistent
with Policy M-2.4.
M-3 Public Transit
Goal M-3 A public transit system that is a viable alternative to automobile travel and meets basic transportation needs of the transit-dependent.
Policies Remarks
M-3.1 Transit Partners. We maintain a
proactive working partnership with transit
providers to ensure that adequate public
transit service is available, cost-efficient,
and convenient, particularly for residents
in environmental justice areas.
Consistent. The Project would not interfere with or
otherwise obstruct the City’s cooperative
partnership with transit providers.
On this basis, the Project is considered consistent
with Policy M-3.1.
M-3.2 Alternative Transit Facilities at New
Development. We require new
development adjacent to an existing or
planned transit stop to contribute to the
creation of transit facilities, such as bus
shelters, transit bays and turnouts, and
bicycle facilities, such as secure storage
areas.
Consistent. The Project would support and would
not conflict with City efforts to contribute to the
creation of transit facilities. To these ends, the
Applicant would coordinate Project development
with the City and transit agencies to implement
transit service and supporting amenities.
On this basis, the Project is considered consistent
with Policy M-3.2.
M-3.3 Transit-Oriented Development. We may
provide additional development-related
incentives to those inherent in the Land
Use Plan for projects that promote transit
use and reduce vehicle miles traveled.
Consistent. The Project would not interfere with or
otherwise obstruct the City’s incentive programs
and policies.
On this basis, the Project is considered consistent
with Policy M-3.3.
M-3.4 Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Corridors. We
work with regional transit agencies to
implement BRT service and reduce vehicle
miles traveled by targeting destinations
and corridors with the highest number of
potential riders.
Consistent. The Project would not interfere with or
otherwise obstruct the City’s cooperative efforts
with regional transit agencies.
On this basis, the Project is considered consistent
with Policy M-3.4.
3402
Dave Waters, Genstar Development Company/GDCI-13
May 29, 2024
15662-03 VMT
TABLE 5: TOP 2050 CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS
MOBILITY ELEMENT
M-3.5 Light Rail. We support extension of the
Metro Rail Gold Line to Ontario, and will
work to secure station locations at the
proposed multimodal transit center.
Consistent. The Specific Plan area is not located
near the potential Metro Rail Gold Line extension to
the City; nor the proposed multimodal transit
center. The Project would not impact, nor be
impacted by, rail operations.
On this basis, the Project is considered consistent
with Policy M-3.5.
M-3.6 Metrolink Expansion. We advocate
expansion of Metrolink service to include
the Downtown and the multimodal transit
center.
Consistent. The Project site is not located near the
Metrolink rail line; nor the proposed multimodal
transit center. The Project would not impact, nor be
impacted by, Metrolink expansion.
On this basis, the Project is considered consistent
with Policy M-3.6.
M-3.7 High Speed Rail. We encourage the
development of high-speed rail systems
that would enhance regional mobility in
Southern California and serve the City of
Ontario.
Consistent. No railways exist within or near the
Specific Plan area. The Project would not interfere
with or otherwise obstruct the development of highspeed rail systems.
On this basis, the Project is considered consistent
with Policy M-3.7.
M-3.8 Feeder Systems. We work with regional
transit agencies to secure convenient
feeder service from the Metrolink station
and the proposed multimodal transit
center to employment centers in Ontario.
Consistent. The Project site is located in an area
already served by public transit. The Project would
implement feeder transit facilities as required by
the City through its coordination with transit
agencies serving the area.
On this basis, the Project is considered consistent
with Policy M-3.8.
M-3.9 Ontario Airport Metro Center
Circulator. We will explore development
of a convenient mobility system, including
but not limited to shuttle service, people
mover, and shared car system, for the
Ontario Airport Metro Center.
Consistent. The Specific Plan area is not located in
or near the Ontario Airport Metro Center. The
Project would not interfere with or otherwise
obstruct the City’s development of a mobility system
in this area.
On this basis, the Project is considered consistent
with Policy M-3.9.
M-3.10 Multimodal Transportation Center. We
intend to ensure the development of a
multimodal transportation center near
ONT airport to serve as a transit hub with
amenities for transit riders, pedestrians,
and bicyclists transitioning to local buses,
BRT, the Gold Line, high-speed rail, the
proposed Ontario Airport Metro Center
Circulator, and other future transit modes.
We support locations for the multimodal
Consistent. The Specific Plan area is not located
in/near the area intended for development of the
Multimodal Transportation Center. The Project
would not interfere with or otherwise obstruct the
implementation of this transit hub.
On this basis, the Project is considered consistent
with Policy M-3.10.
3403
Dave Waters, Genstar Development Company/GDCI-13
May 29, 2024
15662-03 VMT
TABLE 5: TOP 2050 CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS
MOBILITY ELEMENT
transportation center that are north of
ONT airport, between Vineyard Avenue
and Interstate 15.
M-3.11 Transit and Community Facilities. We
require the future development of
community-wide serving facilities to be
sited in transit-ready areas that can be
served and made accessible by public
transit. Conversely, we plan (and
coordinate with other transit agencies to
plan) future transit routes to serve
existing community facilities.
Consistent. The Project site is located in an area
already served by public transit. The Applicant
would also coordinate with the City and transit
agencies to implement transit service and thereby
reduce vehicle miles traveled.
On this basis, the Project is considered consistent
with Policy M-3.11.
M-4 Goods Movement
Goal M-4 An efficient flow of goods through the City that maximizes economic benefits and minimizes negative impacts.
Policies Remarks
M-4.1 Truck Routes. We designate and
maintain a network of City truck routes
that provide for the safe and efficient
transport of goods while minimizing
negative impacts on local circulation and
noise-sensitive land uses, as shown on
Exhibit M-04, Truck Routes. We will
minimize conflicts on truck routes through
the design and implementation of buffers
between travel lanes and pedestrian and
bicycle facilities on designated truck
routes.
Consistent. The Project does not propose uses or
activities that would generate substantial truck
traffic. Any trucks accessing the Specific Plan area
would utilize the City’s designated truck routes,
thereby minimizing negative impacts on local
circulation and noise-sensitive land uses.
On this basis, the Project is considered consistent
with Policy M-4.1.
M-4.2 Regional Participation. We work with
regional and subregional transportation
agencies and adjacent cities to plan and
implement goods movement strategies,
including regional truck routes, plans and
projects that improve mobility, support
the efficient movement of goods, and
minimize negative environmental
impacts.
Consistent. The Project land uses take advantage of
proximate available improved transportation
systems acting generally to facilitate mobility, goods
movement, and goods delivery on a local, subregional and regional basis. The Project would not interfere with or otherwise obstruct City efforts and
actions to coordinate regional and sub-regional
plans and strategies facilitating mobility, goods
movement, and goods delivery.
On this basis, the Project is considered consistent
with Policy M-4.2.
M-4.3 Railroad Grade Separations. We
eliminate at-grade rail crossings
identified on Exhibit M-01, Roadway
Classifications.
Consistent. No at-grade rail crossings are located
within or adjacent to the Project site. The Project
would not interfere with or otherwise obstruct the
City’s elimination actions in this regard.
3404
Dave Waters, Genstar Development Company/GDCI-13
May 29, 2024
15662-03 VMT
TABLE 5: TOP 2050 CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS
MOBILITY ELEMENT
On this basis, the Project is considered consistent
with Policy M-4.3.
M-4.4 Environmental Considerations. We
support both local and regional efforts to
reduce/eliminate the negative
environmental impacts of goods
movement through the planning and
implementation of truck routing and the
development of a plan to evaluate the
future needs of clean fueling/recharging
and electrified truck parking.
Consistent. The Specific Plan Design Guidelines and
Development Regulations act globally to minimize
potential environmental impacts of goods
movement associated with the Project.
Please refer also to remarks at Policies M-4.1, M-4.2.
M-4.5 Air Cargo. We support and promote a
ONT airport that accommodates 1.6
million tons of cargo per year, as long as
the impacts associated with that level of
operations are planned for and mitigated.
Consistent. The Specific Plan area is not located
within an identified Safety Zone of the ONT airport.
The Project would not impact, nor be impacted by,
ONT airport cargo operations.
On this basis, the Project is considered consistent
with Policy M-4.5.
M-5 Regional Transportation
Goal M-5 A proactive leadership role in helping identify and facilitate implementation of strategies that address regional transportation challenges.
Policies Remarks
M-5.1 Regional Leadership. We maintain a
leadership role to help identify and
implement potential solutions to longterm regional transportation problems.
Consistent. The Project would not interfere with or
otherwise obstruct the City’s leadership efforts and
actions.
On this basis, the Project is considered consistent
with Policy M-5.1.
M-5.2 Land Use Compatibility with Regional
Transportation Facilities. We work with
ONT, railroads, Caltrans, SBCTA, and other
transportation agencies to minimize
impacts.
Consistent. The Project would not interfere with or
otherwise obstruct the City’s cooperative efforts
with regional transportation agencies.
On this basis, the Project is considered consistent
with Policy M-5.2.
Sources: Goal and Policy statements from TOP 2050; remarks by Urban Crossroads.
Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, the City would review the final Project designs to ensure consistency with City programs, plans, and policies as outlined above. Consistency with applicable City ordinance requirements is required as a matter of law.
Level of Significance: Less-Than-Significant. As summarized at Table 5, the Project does not propose or require uses or facilities that would conflict with applicable programs, plans, and 3405
Dave Waters, Genstar Development Company/GDCI-13
May 29, 2024
15662-03 VMT
policies addressing the circulation system. Project impacts in these regards would therefore be less-than-significant.
T-2 ASSESSMENT
The Project is consistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b) regarding policies to reduce VMT. The City of Ontario has adopted the following thresholds of significance related to VMT for land use plans:
The SBTAM model should be used to forecast total daily VMT per Service Population (SP) is the required method for estimating VMT.
• A significant impact would occur if the project VMT per SP exceeds the Citywide average VMT per SP under General Plan Buildout Conditions.
• A significant impact would occur if the project caused total daily VMT per SP within the City to be higher than the no project scenario under cumulative conditions.
Based on the VMT analysis previously presented in this technical memorandum, Projectgenerated VMT per service population was found to be less than the City of Ontario VMT per service population under General Plan Buildout Conditions. Additionally, total daily VMT per service population within the City is forecast to remain unchanged under “With Project” for cumulative conditions. The Project therefore results in a less-than-significant VMT impact.
T-3 ASSESSMENT
Efficient and safe operations of the Project would be provided by on-site and localized circulation and intersection improvements to be developed as the Project individual site and building designs are finalized. The City would ensure that all on-site and localized circulation and intersection improvements would be designed and constructed consistent with applicable provisions of the Specific Plan and pursuant to City site plan and Building Permit review processes and requirements.
Traffic signing and striping would be implemented in conjunction with detailed Project construction plans. Sight distance at each Project access point would be reviewed with respect to standard Caltrans and City of Ontario sight distance standards at the time of preparation of final grading, landscape and street improvement plans.
The Project would generate passenger car trips typical of the proposed uses. As part of established site and Building Permit review processes, the City would require implementation of designated travel paths, signing, and traffic controls to ensure that traffic conflicts are minimized or avoided. Land uses proximate to the Project site are planned for, or are developed with urban uses similar to those proposed by the Project. These uses would generate urban traffic types similar to traffic generated by the Project and would not generate traffic that would be incompatible with the Project traffic types.
As supported by the preceding discussions, the potential for the Project to substantially increase hazards to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment); is considered less-than-significant. 3406
Dave Waters, Genstar Development Company/GDCI-13
May 29, 2024
15662-03 VMT
T-4 ASSESSMENT
EMERGENCY ACCESS
Access to the Specific Plan area is provided by improved urban roadways. As part of the City’s established design review processes, design and implementation of all Project circulation improvements, as well as final design(s) of the Project site plan(s), to include locations and design of proposed driveways, would be required to be reviewed and approved by the City Traffic Engineer. In addition, as part of the City’s established design review processes, representatives of the City’s Police and Fire Departments would review the Project’s plans in regard to emergency access. Efficient and safe access within, and access to, the Project is provided by the Specific Plan design concepts, site access improvements, and site adjacent roadway improvements included as components of the Project. In combination, these elements act to facilitate emergency access and avoid conditions that would restrict or limit access under emergency conditions.
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
It is also recognized that temporary and interim traffic detours and traffic disruptions could occur during Project construction. To minimize effects of Project construction on area traffic patterns, it is recommended that the following or similar Construction Area Traffic Management Plan (Plan) be implemented as a Project Condition of Approval. Typical elements and information incorporated in the Plan would include, but not be limited to:
• Name of on-site construction superintendent and contact phone number. • Identification of Construction Contract Responsibilities - For example, for excavation and grading activities, describe the approximate depth of excavation, and quantity of soil import/export (if any).
• Identification and Description of Truck Routes - to include the number of trucks and their staging location(s) (if any).
• Identification and Description of Material Storage Locations (if any). • Location and Description of Construction Trailer (if any). • Identification and Description of Traffic Controls - Traffic controls shall be provided per the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) if the occupation or closure of any traffic lanes, parking lanes, parkways or any other public right-of-way is required. If the right-of-way occupation requires configurations or controls not identified in the MUTCD, a separate traffic control plan must be submitted to the City for review and approval. All right-of-way encroachments would require permitting through the City. • Identification and Description of Parking - Estimate the number of workers and identify parking areas for their vehicles.
• Identification and Description of Maintenance Measures - Identify and describe measures taken to ensure that the work site and public right-of-way would be maintained (including dust control).
3407
Dave Waters, Genstar Development Company/GDCI-13
May 29, 2024
15662-03 VMT
The Plan would be reviewed and approved by the City prior to the issuance of the first building permit. The Plan and its requirements would also be required to be provided to all contractors as one component of building plan/contract document packages.
Based on the preceding, the potential for the Project to result in inadequate emergency access would be less-than-significant.
If you have any questions, please contact me directly at [email protected].
3408
15662-03 VMT
REFERENCES
1. City of Ontario. SB 743 VMT Thresholds. City of Ontario : s.n., June 2020.
2. —. The Ontario Plan 2050. City of Ontario : PlaceWorks, August 2022.
3. City of Eastvale. Eastvale General Plan 2040. City of Eastvale : PlaceWorks, March 2024. Volume I.
3409
15662-03 VMT
ATTACHMENT A
PROJECT SITE PLAN
3410
15662-03 VMT
EXHIBIT A-1: PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
3411
DEXTER WILSON ENGINEERING, INC.
WATER ● WASTEWATER ● RECYCLED WATER
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
2234 FARADAY AVENUE ● CARLSBAD, CA ● (760) 438-4422
WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS FOR THE
ESPERANZA PA 11 PROJECT IN
ONTARIO RANCH
IN THE CITY OF ONTARIO
April 17, 2025
3412
3413
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE NO.
Introduction ............................................................................................................................1 Purpose of Study .......................................................................................................................3 Study Area and Available Water System Pressure .................................................................3 Water System Design Criteria ..................................................................................................3 Water Demand Rates.....................................................................................................4 Peaking Factors .............................................................................................................4 Existing and Proposed Water System ......................................................................................4 Private Water System ...........................................................................................................6 Domestic Meter and Service ..........................................................................................6 Private Fire Protection Service .....................................................................................7 Hydraulic Model Development..................................................................................................7 Available Hydraulic Grade Line....................................................................................7 Fitting and Valve Losses ...............................................................................................7 Meter and Backflow Assembly Losses...........................................................................7 Hydraulic Model Analysis ........................................................................................................8 Conclusions and Recommendations..........................................................................................9
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A DESIGN CRITERIA
APPENDIX B PRIVATE WATER REFERENCE
APPENDIX C COMPUTER MODELING OUTPUT
3414
DEXTER WILSON ENGINEERING, INC. PAGE 2
LIST OF FIGURES
PAGE NO.
FIGURE 1 VICINITY MAP.......................................................................................2 FIGURE 2 EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER SYSTEM..................................5
LIST OF TABLES
PAGE NO.
TABLE 1 ESPERANZA PA 11 WATER DEMAND FACTORS .............................4 TABLE 2 ESPERANZA PA 11 PROJECTED WATER DEMAND ........................6 3415
3416
3417
Marcos Padilla, P.E.
April 17, 2025
Water System Analysis for Esperanza PA 11 Project
DEXTER WILSON ENGINEERING, INC. PAGE 3
Purpose of Study
The purpose of this letter report is to analyze the existing and proposed water system for Esperanza PA 11 project and determine if there are any water system deficiencies created by the proposed development of this property and land use change from school site to residential.
This report will address any offsite (public) water system improvements are needed for the development of the project so that the offsite water system will be in conformance with the City water system design standards.
A previous Master Plan of Water was prepared for the entire project in 2015 for the overall developer.
Study Area and Available Water System Pressure
In general, the study area for this water report is Esperanza PA 11 project boundary. The extent of the existing water system which was incorporated into the analysis of the project site was based on the existing water distribution system that serves the project area.
Figure 2 presents the existing and proposed water facilities in the project area.
Water service to the project will be from the 925 Pressure Zone of the City’s public water system. Finished floor elevations on the project property range between 705 feet and 711 feet. This results in a maximum static water pressure range of 93 psi to 95 psi on the project site.
Water System Design Criteria
The design criteria used for the evaluation of the proposed water system by Esperanza PA 11 project are based on City design criteria. This water design criteria is presented in the City’s most recent Master Plan for the overall project. A copy of the pertinent sections where the design criteria is located is attached as Appendix A. 3418
Marcos Padilla, P.E.
April 17, 2025
Water System Analysis for Esperanza PA 11 Project
DEXTER WILSON ENGINEERING, INC. PAGE 4
Water Demand Rates. The water demand rates for the project and surrounding area are presented as Table 1 below.
TABLE 1
ESPERANZA PA 11 WATER DEMAND FACTORS
Land Use Demand Factor
Residential – Attached Dwellings
(11-25 units/acre)
323 gpd/unit
Peaking Factors. The peaking factors utilized in this study are identified in the City’s Master Plan. To convert average day demand to maximum day demand a peaking factor of
1.55 was utilized and to convert average day demand to peak hour demand a peaking factor of 1.98 was utilized.
Existing and Proposed Water System
There are existing public water facilities directly adjacent to the project site. There is an existing 24-inch diameter public water line in Eucalyptus Avenue and existing 8-inch public water lines surrounding the project. The project will be connecting its onsite private water systems to two existing water lines in Amherst Avenue and Chatham Street.
Figure 2 presents the existing and proposed water system in the project vicinity. 3419
3420
Marcos Padilla, P.E.
April 17, 2025
Water System Analysis for Esperanza PA 11 Project
DEXTER WILSON ENGINEERING, INC. PAGE 6
Table 2 provides the summary of projected water demand for the project.
TABLE 2
ESPERANZA PA 11 PROJECTED WATER DEMAND
Description Quantity
Unit Demand
Factor
Total Avg.
Demand, gpd
Medium Density Residential 161 units 323 gpd/unit 52,003 Per the City design criteria, the maximum day demand calculates to be 80,605 gpd (56 gpm) and the peak hour demand calculates to be 102,966 (72 gpm).
Private Water System
Per the City’s requirement, the onsite water system for Esperanza PA 11 will be private. One connection will be made for the domestic service and two connections will be made for the fire protection service to the project site. Connections will be made at Chatham Street and Amherst Avenue.
Domestic Meter and Service. The preliminary water fixture count (WFU) for the proposed units are estimated to be 30 to 35 WFUs per unit. Based on a WFU count of between 30 and 35 fixture units per home and an extrapolation curve as shown in Appendix B, the design demand for water meter sizing is estimated to be approximately 675 gpm for the project.
Based on the meter capacities established in AWWA C700-20, the project will likely require a 4-inch or 6-inch meter. A bypass meter will be provided in the event that the primary meter is temporarily of service. The final sizing of the service laterals and meters will need to be confirmed once the fixture units and plumbing plans for each home are finalized. 3421
Marcos Padilla, P.E.
April 17, 2025
Water System Analysis for Esperanza PA 11 Project
DEXTER WILSON ENGINEERING, INC. PAGE 7
Private Fire Protection Service. The private fire protection system will consist of two DCDA backflow preventers at each connection point and 8-inch diameter water lines throughout the project. The 8-inch diameter private fire protection system will sufficiently convey the projected 1,500 gpm fire flow requirement. This was confirmed by a hydraulic computer model that is presented in the next section of this water study.
Hydraulic Model Development
The KYPIPE computer software program developed by the University of Kentucky was used to analyze the proposed onsite and existing offsite public water system. KYPIPE utilizes the Hazen-Williams equation for determining head loss in pipes. The program also determines the flow and velocity in the pipes as well as the available pressure at nodes in the water system. An assumed roughness coefficient “C” value of 120 was used for all pipes.
Available Hydraulic Grade Line. Fire flow test data in the vicinity of the project was performed by the City and is included in Appendix C for reference. Results from the hydrant flow test show a residual pressure of approximately 58 psi at the fire flow requirement for the project at the hydrant flow test location (Eucalyptus Avenue west of the project site).
Fitting and Valve Losses. To simulate minor losses through pipe fittings and valves, minor loss coefficients or “k” values for all fittings associated with pipes were included in the hydraulic model.
Meter and Backflow Assembly Losses. The pressure loss through the proposed meters and backflow preventers was incorporated into the computer model. Appendix B presents candidate DCDA and RP backflow preventers. The manufacturer’s literature includes charts which show pressure loss through the backflow preventer as a function of flow. These charts were used to incorporate the pressure losses reflected in the computer modeling. 3422
Marcos Padilla, P.E.
April 17, 2025
Water System Analysis for Esperanza PA 11 Project
DEXTER WILSON ENGINEERING, INC. PAGE 8
Hydraulic Model Analysis
Hydraulic modeling of the proposed onsite and existing offsite water system for the Esperanza PA 11 project was performed to confirm the pipe sizes necessary to provide adequate domestic and fire protection service. The water system was analyzed under an onsite 1,500 gpm fire flow scenario.
Appendix C provides the results of the computer model for the analyzed water system.
Exhibit A at the back of Appendix C provides the Node and Pipe Diagram of the analyzed water system.
The results of the hydraulic analyses presented in Appendix C show that the proposed water system for the project site is adequate for domestic service and fire protection. For fire protection, the results of the computer runs show that a fire flow of 1,500 gpm can be delivered to the any fire hydrant within the project site with a residual pressure at the hydrant of greater than 20 psi. The minimum residual pressures are 31 psi under a 1,500 gpm fire flow scenario. Domestic demands can be provided with residual pressures of at least 58 psi.
The results of the computer hydraulic analyses for Esperanza PA 11 project indicate that the existing public water system can provide sufficient flow and pressure for the projects’ domestic and expected fire protection service needs.
3423
Marcos Padilla, P.E.
April 17, 2025
Water System Analysis for Esperanza PA 11 Project
DEXTER WILSON ENGINEERING, INC. PAGE 9
Conclusions and Recommendations
The following conclusions and recommendations are summarized based on the water system analysis prepared for the proposed Esperanza PA 11 project.
1. The project will be supplied from the existing City 925 Zone water system.
2. The project is proposing to make two connections to the existing public water system.
These include a connection to an existing 8-inch diameter line in Chatham Street and a connection to an existing 8-inch line in Amherst Avenue.
3. Figure 2 presents the existing and proposed water system surrounding the project.
4. The estimated WFU count and corresponding peak water demand (675 gpm approximate) is provided on page 6 of this report.
5. A maximum day demand plus fire flow of 1,500 gpm can be met at the project site with existing and the proposed piping with all residual pressures greater than 20 psi.
6. Fire flow test data in the vicinity of the project was performed by the City and is included in Appendix C for reference
7. This report presents the sizing and a general schematic layout of the proposed onsite water system. The design engineer for the water system should incorporate valves, fittings, and appurtenances in accordance with the design guidelines of the City of Ontario.
8. The recommended material specification for all new potable water lines is AWWA C900 DR18 PVC.
3424
3425
APPENDIX A
DESIGN CRITERIA
3426
3427
4-1 R:Rpts\\Ontario, City of|2020_Water Master Plan
SECTION 4
WATER USE
4-1 Historic Water Production and Purchase
The City obtains its potable water supply from groundwater wells in Chino Basin and imported water from the Water Facilities Authority (WFA) and the Chino Basin Desalter Authority (CDA). Currently, the City operates seventeen (17) active wells.
The total annual water production and purchase from January 2007 to December 2018 is shown in Table 4-1 and on Figure 4-1. Figure 4-2 illustrates the historic water production and purchase by month. Over the last twelve years, the annual supply has averaged a total of 35,774 AFY (31.9 mgd). The average groundwater production is 23,520 AFY (21.0 mgd). Per the Chino Basin Watermaster 41st Annual Report, the City of Ontario has appropriative rights to 16,337 AFY, and its share of the initial operating safe yield is 11,374 AFY or 21 percent of the appropriative pool rights. The City has secured additional supply through transfers, purchase, and groundwater recharge. The average amount of imported water purchased is 12,253 AFY (10.9 mgd).
There has been a decrease in production over the past twelve years. This may be attributed to the expansion conscientious water conservation effort by the customers.
Water conservation is discussed further in Section 4-9.
Table 4-1
Historic Water Production and Purchase (Annual)
CDA
(AFY)
WFA
(AFY)
SAWCO
(AFY)
Total
(AFY)
Total
(mgd)
% of
Total
Local
(AFY)
DYY
Shift
(AFY)
Total
(AFY) mgd
% of
Total AFY mgd
2007 5,125 12,734 0 17,859 15.9 40% 26,946 0 26,946 24.1 60% 44,806 40.0 2008 5,498 8,740 0 14,238 12.7 33% 27,064 2,000 29,064 25.9 67% 43,302 38.7 2009 5,047 3,494 0 8,541 7.6 22% 28,996 2,000 30,996 27.7 78% 39,537 35.3 2010 5,327 7,666 0 12,993 11.6 37% 20,955 1,043 21,997 19.6 63% 34,990 31.2 2011 5,162 8,883 0 14,046 12.5 41% 20,442 0 20,442 18.3 59% 34,488 30.8 2012 4,911 10,415 0 15,326 13.7 43% 20,226 0 20,226 18.1 57% 35,552 31.7 2013 4,987 10,967 0 15,954 14.2 44% 19,967 0 19,967 17.8 56% 35,921 32.1 2014 5,288 10,135 0 15,423 13.8 43% 20,274 0 20,274 18.1 57% 35,697 31.9 2015 3,543 6,413 443 10,399 9.3 35% 19,544 0 19,544 17.5 65% 29,943 26.7 2016 3,029 2,398 107 5,534 4.9 19% 24,132 0 24,132 21.5 81% 29,666 26.5 2017 3,039 3,035 294 6,367 5.7 20% 25,797 0 25,797 23.0 80% 32,164 28.7 2018 4,413 5,589 359 10,361 9.3 31% 22,860 0 22,860 20.4 69% 33,221 29.7 Average 4,614 7,539 100 12,253 10.9 34% 23,100 420 23,520 21.0 66% 35,774 31.9 Calendar
Year
Imported Water Purchased
Total
Production
Groundwater Well Production and Purchase
of the City’s recycled water system, as well as a
CITY OF ONTARIO Potable Water Master Plan Update
3428
4-2 R:Rpts\\Ontario, City of|2020_Water Master Plan
F gure 4-1 i Historical Water Production and Purchase (Annual) Figure 4-2 Historical Water Production and Purchase (Monthly) 5 "H Production(AFY)
O N> ro co co u CJ1
cn o cn o cn O CJl o cn o
Q 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 % O o o o o o o o o o
2 sa 2007 am: 17,859 0
2008 29,064 14,238
2009 30,996 8,541
2010 21,997 12,993
2011 20,442 14,046
OQ>
CD3
Q. 2012 15,326 Q)
-<
CDG>
2013 15,954
2014 T 15,423
S'
& 2015 19,544 10,399 if m
9 3
O -O
2016 24,132 5,534 c o
=3
Q- ft)
I
CL D) <
S
’ § </) $
if 2017 2 5,797 6,367
*>
s
1 >
a H
2018 22,860 10,361 m *
5 5 2
I & c
Cfi if m
WATER USE
R:Rpts\\Ontario, City of|2020_Water Master Plan
3 Population data from California Department of Finance, E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities 2000-2018, excluding estimate of population for areas in Ontario served by CVWD. 4 Water consumption estimates are from monthly water billing data. 1 Consumption from annual Department of Water Resources Public Water System Statistics Report. 2. Water Production/Purchase data extracted from City's Anuual System Operations Data EE Water Consumption versus Water Production / Purchase The City typically purchases/produces more water than the quantity measured by the customer meters. Table 4-2 summarizes the difference between the measured consumption and production from 2007 to 2018. Figure 4-3 graphically shows the City’s water consumption versus production/purchase.
Table 4-2
Water Consumption versus Water Production/Purchase
Water
Production/
Purchase2
(AFY)
Per Capita
Production/
Purchase
(gpcd)
Water
Consumption
(AFY)
Per Capita
Consumption
(gpcd)
NonRevenue
Water (%)
1 Calendar
Year Population3
2007 44,286 44,806 1.2% 158,405 253 250
2008 42,072 43,302 2.8% 158,181 244 237
2009 37,708 39,537 4.6% 157,539 224 214
2010 35,403 34,990 -1.2% 158,154 198 200
2011 37,735 34,488 -9.4% 160,723 192 210
2012 37,652 35,552 -5.9% 160,827 197 209
2013 34,212 35,921 4.8% 161,812 198 189
2014 35,160 35,697 1.5% 162,778 196 193
20154 29,346 29,943 2.0% 164,389 163 159
20164 29,056 29,666 2.1% 165,966 160 156
20174 30,817 32,164 4.2% 169,387 170 162
20184 33,026 33,221 0.6% 171,819 173 172
Average 35,539 35,774 2.6% 162,498 197 196
Per the historical records, the consumption between 2010 and 2012 was more than the amount of water produced and/or purchased, which could not have actually happened. Possible explanations for the discrepancy in data include the following:
> During this time, the City was expanding its recycled water system. Some customers were converted from potable water use to recycled water use. Some of the consumption data might have actually been a combination of the potable and recycled water use.
> City staff has been updating and reclassifying meter types in its billing database. Some of the data provided in the historical DWR reports might have been misclassified at the time the report was created. > Meters are not always perfectly calibrated. The margin of error in few large meters that measure production and purchase amounts or the thousands of small meters measuring consumption could contribute to the discrepancy in data.
The water consumption data before the 2015 Calendar Year is based on Department of Water Resources Public Water System Statistics Reports. After the 2015 Calendar Year, the consumption data is based on the monthly water billing data. Non-revenue water makes up between 0.6% and 4.8% of the total production and purchase supply, respectively. The City strives to keep the percentage as low as possible. The City’s non-revenue water is 2.6%, on average.
CITY OF ONTARIO 4-3 Potable Water Master Plan Update
3430
4-4 R:Rpts\\Ontario, City of|2020_Water Master Plan
Non-revenue water occurs in all water systems. There will be differences in the accuracies of the few large meters which measure purchases and production, and the thousands of small customer meters which measure sales. Non-revenue water can also be due to unmeasured uses such as water main flushing and other maintenance related tasks. The remainder may be due to leaks from the system. The average nonrevenue water rate of 2.6%.
Figure 4-3
Water Consumption versus Water Production/Purchase
4-3 Water Demand Variations
Demand variations through a year are influenced by seasonal effects such as temperature, humidity, and precipitation. System demand variations throughout a day are influenced by the customer base and the daily lifestyles of the customers. In primarily residential areas, the peak demands within a day typically occur in the morning hours between 6:00 am and 9:00 am, when customers wake
to begin their daily routine. In largely commercial and industrial areas, the peaks may occur mid-day or the demand may even remain relatively constant throughout the work day.
For this study, the variations are expressed as a ratio to the average demand, with the average demand being equal to
one.
For the purpose of this master plan, the average day demand was based on the most recent twelve consecutive months of production and purchase data that was available at the time the hydraulic model was created. The average day demand is summarized in Table 4-3.
4-4 Monthly Demand Variations
water consumption exhibits a distinct seasonal pattern. Peak and low monthly consumption occur during the dry summer months and wet winter months, respectively. Monthly demand Table 4-3
Average Day Demand for the Hydraulic
Water Model
WATER USE
City’s
S g
« 8
r-J 50, 000 o rv
ro rv
cn
°
,
CM
P Purchase/Production
P Consumption
rv
ro M
a
*
rv m rC
45,000 in CM m
•»n
M 2
in rv
in m
*
-H
is o 55 «
o»
2*
* m «
„rv oooo rv- ro °lr1
in «N
H in
rsi S «M o.
<n ro' m ro
40,000 ro T
in in ID rv
H H
or «L
ro o
ro ro 3 $
ro ro ro s s
35, 000 in i£> O
a or «N
cn ro CT1 r-J 04 30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
>-
u
_ <
<D
E
3 O
>
5, 000
0 4
Ni * * * 00 CD CO ^
r ID CO hv 00
o o o o CM
o o o o o o o o o
CM CM CM o o o CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
Calendar Year
* Data discrepancy possibly doe to conversion of potable meters to recycled water system,reclassification of meters in billing database, and/or error in meter reads
AF MGD gpm
September 2018 3,179 34.53 23,980
October 2018 2,850 29.95 20,800
November 2018 2,583 28.06 19,483
December 2018 2,053 21.58 14,988
January 2019 1,915 20.13 13,980
February 2019 1,503 17.49 12,147
March 2019 1,831 19.25 13,366
April 2019 2,708 29.41 20,425
May 2019 2,682 28.19 19,574
Typical of most Southern California communities, the City’s June 2019 2,966 32.22 22,373 July 2019 3,404 35.78 24,847
August 2019 3,479 36.57 25,397
Total 31,153 27.76 19,280
CITY OF ONTARIO Potable Water Master Plan Update
3431
4-5 R:Rpts\\Ontario, City of|2020_Water Master Plan
totals and factors for 2007 to 2018 are shown in Table 4-4. Peak demands typically occur in July and August.
Low demands typically occur in February. The highest and lowest monthly demand factor for the 2018 Calendar year is 1.46 and 0.82, respectively.
The maximum month factor is estimated to be 1.46 times the ADD, which is representative of the OMC demands, since there is very little existing usage in the OR area. The OR maximum day peaking factor was estimated to be 1.36, which was developed by excluding a portion of the water use that is expected to be served through the recycled water system.
Table 4-4
Monthly Water Demand Totals and Factors
AF Factor AF Factor AF Factor AF Factor AF Factor AF Factor AF Factor January 3,031 0.81 2,402 0.67 2,639 0.80 2,134 0.73 2,090 0.73 2,427 0.82 2,108 0.70 February 2,402 0.64 2,238 0.62 2,033 0.62 1,690 0.58 2,004 0.70 2,190 0.74 1,958 0.65 March 3,127 0.84 3,055 0.85 2,726 0.83 2,345 0.80 2,060 0.72 2,317 0.78 2,583 0.86 April 3,387 0.91 3,588 0.99 3,297 1.00 2,683 0.92 2,574 0.90 2,369 0.80 2,883 0.96 May 4,132 1.11 4,032 1.12 3,880 1.18 3,325 1.14 3,267 1.14 3,212 1.08 3,362 1.12 June 4,511 1.21 4,363 1.21 3,574 1.08 3,621 1.24 3,493 1.22 3,597 1.21 3,500 1.17 July 5,039 1.35 4,750 1.32 4,385 1.33 3,970 1.36 3,895 1.36 3,881 1.31 3,808 1.27 August 4,974 1.33 4,733 1.31 4,307 1.31 4,005 1.37 3,939 1.37 4,061 1.37 3,824 1.28 September 4,359 1.17 4,338 1.20 4,008 1.22 3,714 1.27 3,524 1.23 3,722 1.26 3,574 1.19 October 3,925 1.05 4,105 1.14 3,403 1.03 2,878 0.99 3,004 1.05 3,276 1.11 3,251 1.09 November 3,369 0.90 3,323 0.92 3,028 0.92 2,500 0.86 2,307 0.80 2,641 0.89 2,657 0.89 December 2,549 0.68 2,374 0.66 2,257 0.69 2,125 0.73 2,331 0.81 1,860 0.63 2,411 0.81 Average 3,734 3,609 3,295 2,916 2,874 2,963 2,993
AF Factor AF Factor AF Factor AF Factor AF Factor AF Factor January 2,657 0.89 2,080 0.83 1,717 0.69 1,647 0.66 2,309 0.93 2,270 0.77 February 2,210 0.74 2,039 0.82 1,884 0.76 1,465 0.59 2,223 0.90 2,028 0.69 March 2,434 0.82 2,523 1.01 2,020 0.82 2,133 0.85 2,034 0.82 2,446 0.83 April 2,859 0.96 2,698 1.08 2,271 0.92 2,650 1.06 2,744 1.11 2,834 0.94 May 3,487 1.17 2,513 1.01 2,476 1.00 2,830 1.13 2,867 1.16 3,282 1.11 June 3,596 1.21 2,822 1.13 2,890 1.17 3,104 1.24 3,181 1.29 3,521 1.19 July 3,838 1.29 2,809 1.13 3,226 1.30 3,458 1.39 3,596 1.45 3,888 1.30 August 3,657 1.23 2,977 1.19 3,301 1.34 3,421 1.37 3,601 1.46 3,900 1.31 September 3,494 1.17 2,664 1.07 3,008 1.22 3,085 1.24 3,179 1.29 3,556 1.20 October 3,168 1.07 2,550 1.02 2,554 1.03 3,083 1.24 2,850 1.15 3,171 1.06 November 2,488 0.84 2,252 0.90 2,347 0.95 2,634 1.06 2,583 1.04 2,677 0.89 December 1,809 0.61 2,016 0.81 1,973 0.80 2,654 1.06 2,053 0.83 2,201 0.72 Average 2,975 2,495 2,472 2,680 2,768 2,981
Month
Month
2013
2014 2015 2016
2012
Average
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
2017 2018
WATER USE
CITY OF ONTARIO Potable Water Master Plan Update
3432
4-6 R:Rpts\\Ontario, City of|2020_Water Master Plan
Figure 4-4
Monthly Demand Factors
4-5 Daily Demand Variations
In the predominately developed OMC service area, the MDD is estimated to be 1.60 times the ADD. The OR maximum day peaking factor was estimated to be 1.50, which was developed by excluding a portion of the water use that is expected to be served through the recycled water system. The MDD estimate is summarized in Table 4-5.
In the hydraulic model, demands and patterns for high water users were allocated based on field data that was captured during the calibration period. For modeling purposes, the calibration diurnal pattern and demands were used for the ADD and MDD scenarios.
Table 4-5
Maximum Day Demand Summary
WATER USE
ADD (gpm) MDD MDD (gpm) /ADD
Peaking
Factor
Non- NonHWU1 HWU1 HWU Total HWU Total
Original Model Colony (OMC) 17,196 1,691 18,887 1.6 27,512 1,691 29,202 Ontario Ranch (OR) 391 2 393 1.5 586 2 588
Total 17,587 1,693 19,280 28,097 1,693 29,790
1 High water user demand and diurnal patterns are based on the calibration period CITY OF ONTARIO Potable Water Master Plan Update
3433
4-7 R:Rpts\\Ontario, City of|2020_Water Master Plan
4-6 Hourly Demand Variations
Knowledge of accurate demand variations over a 24-hour period is essential for proper analysis of water systems. For this study, diurnal use patterns were developed for each hydraulic zone. Customer specific diurnal patterns were developed for high water users. The development of diurnal use patterns are described in detail in Section 5 (Diurnal Patterns) of this report. 4-7 System Demands and Peaking Factors
It is important to evaluate a water system during various incremental peak demands. Typically, a water system is designed to meet the maximum demands placed on it. The system components must be designed to cope with these demands as they occur. Maximum month and maximum day demands are important factors in sizing demands usually dictate the design criteria for both system respect to its transmission and distribution elements, as well as its operational storage capacity.
The peaking factors for Ontario Ranch (OR) was further refined to account for the fact that it is planned to be largely residential in nature and there were a dual recycled water system constructed in all major streets. The City anticipates a target of 12 percent of the total water use in low density residential areas to be provided by the recycled water system. It is expected that this percentage will increase as the residential density increases.
With more recycled water and less irrigation use on the domestic water system, the peaking factors in OR are reduced as detailed in Table 4-6. These factors are utilized for future demand estimates in Ontario Ranch.
The relationships between the peaking factors developed for this study with respect to the average day demand estimate are displayed graphically on Figure 4-5.
Table 4-6
Existing Water System Demands and Peaking Factors
OMC
Demand
OR
Demand
HWU
Demand1
(gpm) (gpm) (gpm) (gpm) (mgd) (AFY)
Average Day 17,196 391 1,693 19,280 27.76 31,098 1.00 1.00 1.00 Max Month 25,107 531 1,693 27,331 39.36 44,085 1.46 1.36 1.42 Max Day 27,512 586 1,693 29,790 42.90 48,051 1.60 1.50 1.55 Peak Hour2 N.A. N.A. N.A. 36,934 53.19 59,575 N.A.
Demand
Description
Total System Demand (OMC)
Peaking
Factor
(OR)
Peaking
Factor
Total
System
Peaking
Factor
WATER USE
a system’s supply capability. Maximum day
transmission and storage needs. Peak hour criterion is a measure of the system’s overall adequacy with N.A. 1.98
1 High water user demand and diurnal patterns are based on the calibration period 2 System Wide Peak Hour Factor was developed with multiple diurnal patterns that differ by zone, meter type, andfor high water users.
CITY OF ONTARIO Potable Water Master Plan Update
3434
4-8 R:Rpts\\Ontario, City of|2020_Water Master Plan
Figure 4-5
Water Demand Peaking Factors
4-7.1 Existing Demands
Average Day - As detailed in Table 4-2, the average day demand daily production and purchase data between September 2018 and August 2019. As shown in Table 4-5, the average day demand is 31,153 AFY (19,280 gpm).
Maximum Month - As detailed in Table 4-6, the maximum month peaking factor for OMC and OR are 1.46 and 1.36, respectively. The maximum month demand is estimated as 45,341 AFY (28,109 gpm).
Maximum Day - As detailed in Table 4-6, the maximum day peaking factor for OMC and OR are 1.6 and
1.5, respectively. The maximum day demand is estimated as 48,051 AFY (29,790 gpm).
Peak Hour Demands - Modeled peak hour demands were based upon the diurnal patterns that were developed for the hydraulic model, as detailed in Section 5. The overall peak hour system demand is estimated to be 1.98 times the average day demand or 61,656 AFY (38,224 gpm). This factor varies by zone depending on the diurnal patterns developed by zone, meter type, and for high water users.
Existing Water Demands by Zone - Existing water demands by zone are shown in Table 4-5. These estimates are based upon the demand distribution generated from water billing historical data linked to the re distributed in the model using the 12-
, adjusted to the most-recent production and
purchase data (31,094 AFY; 27.8 mgd; 19,280 gpm) which takes into consideration non-revenue water.
Generally, the ADD were increased with the factors included in Table 4-6 to develop the Maximum Day Demands (MDD), which are summarized by zone in Table 4-7. It should be noted that the MDD model demands for the high water users are based on actual field data collected during the calibration period, and they are not estimated with the MDD peaking factor included in Table 4-6. The MDD total 48,051 AFY (42.9 mgd; 29,790 gpm).
WATER USE
2.20 Original Model Colony
DOntario Ranch
Total System
2.00 1.92 1.92 1.92
1 80
o
o
1.60 1.55 «3 1.60
U
_ 1.50 1.46
O) 1.42
c 1.36 1.40
(O
a>
CL 1.20
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00m0.80
0.60 0.40
0.20 0.00
Average Day Max Month Max Day Peak Hour
Demand
> is based on the City of Ontario’s average
>
>
>
>
City’s meter geodatabase. The average day demands (ADD) we month consumption data from the City’s billing department CITY OF ONTARIO Potable Water Master Plan Update
3435
4-9 R:Rpts\\Ontario, City of|2020_Water Master Plan
Table 4-7
Existing Water Demands by Zone
4-7.2 Water Unit Demand Factors
Existing consumption data was used in this study to represent the water use of existing customers. For future developments, water unit demand factors were used to estimate future water use. Potable water unit demand factors are generally based on the factors that were developed as a part of a study completed in May 2016 Ultimate Citywide Water Demand Estimate
The revised potable water unit demand factors are shown in Table 4-8.
The residential unit demand factors were first developed in terms of gpd/person. Then the maximum densities (people/du and du/ac) were applied to determine the factors in other units. The resulting unit factors in terms of gpd/du and gpd/ac represent the maximum expected demand factors.
The 2016 study included maximum residential densities in the Ontario Ranch area, which were based on rtment. Some of the recent
actual projections are higher than those included in the Ontario Plan, which needed to be updated to appropriately develop the demand factors and the future demand estimate. gpm mgd AFY
% of
Total gpm mgd AFY
% of
Total
1348 2,059 2.96 3,321 10.7% 3,273 4.71 5,280 11.0%
1212 8,947 12.88 14,432 46.4% 13,718 19.75 22,127 46.0% 1074 3,839 5.53 6,192 19.9% 5,939 8.55 9,579 19.9%
1010 4,153 5.98 6,698 21.5% 6,439 9.27 10,386 21.6%
925 282 0.41 455 1.5% 422 0.61 680 1.4%
Total 19,280 27.76 31,098 100.0% 29,790 42.90 48,051 100.0% 1 MDD for high water users model demands are based on actual field data collected, not MDD peaking factors included in Table 4-6
Average Day Demand Maximum Day Demand1
Zone
WATER USE
entitled “
historical development projections that were provided by the City’s planning depa CITY OF ONTARIO Potable Water Master Plan Update
3436
4-10 R:Rpts\\Ontario, City of|2020_Water Master Plan
Table 4-8
Potable Water Unit Demand Factors
gpd unit gpd/ac gpd/du
Residential
Rural Residential RR 2 3.997 172 gpd/person 1,375 687
Low Density Residential (w/o RW) LDR 4 3.997 123 gpd/person 1,970 492 Low Density Residential (w/ RW) LDR 5 3.997 95 gpd/person 1,900 380 Low Medium Density Residential (w/o RW) LMDR 8.5 3.997 105 gpd/person 3,570 420 Low Medium Density Residential (w/ RW) LMDR 11 3.997 90 gpd/person 3,960 360 Medium Density Residential (w/o RW) MDR 18 3.347 90 gpd/person 5,420 301 Medium Density Residential (w/ RW) MDR 25 3.347 80 gpd/person 6,690 268 High Density Residential (w/o RW) HDR 35 3.347 70 gpd/person 8,200 234 High Density Residential (w/ RW) HDR 40 3.347 60 gpd/person 8,030 201 Commercial
Business Park (w/o RW) BP 103 gpd/job 3,140
Business Park (w/ RW) BP - - 59 gpd/job 1,800 -
General Commercial (w/o RW) GC 258 gpd/job 3,140
General Commercial (w/ RW) GC - - 148 gpd/job 1,800 -
Hospitality4
(w/o RW) HOS 155 gpd/room 5,980
Hospitality4
(w/ RW) HOS - - 130 gpd/room 5,000 -
Neighborhood Commercial (w/o RW) NC 99 gpd/job 3,140
Neighborhood Commercial (w/ RW) NC - - 57 gpd/job 1,800 - Office Commercial (w/o RW) OC 53 gpd/job 3,840
Office Commercial (w/ RW) OC - - 35 gpd/job 2,500 -
Industrial
Industrial (w/o RW) IND - - 110 gpd/job 2,290 -
Industrial (w/ RW) IND - - 67 gpd/job 1,400 -
Mixed Use5
High Density Residential (w/o RW) MU-HDR 35 2.000 70 gpd/person 4,900 140 High Density Residential (w/ RW) MU-HDR 40 2.000 60 gpd/person 4,800 120 Office (w/o RW) MU-O 53 gpd/job 3,840
Office (w/ RW) MU-O - - 35 gpd/job 2,500 -
Non-Office (w/o RW) MU-NO 179 gpd/job 2,690
Non-Office (w/ RW) MU-NO - - 102 gpd/job 1,800 -
Open Space
Open Space Non-Recreational (w/o RW) OS-NR 2,340
Open Space Non-Recreational (w/ RW) OS-NR - - 1,000 -
Open Space Recreational (w/o RW) OS-R 2,340
Open Space Recreational (w/ RW) OS-R - - - 1,000 -
-
Landuse
Max
Density
(du/ac)1
Density
(people/
du)2
Domestic Water Unit Demand
Factors3
WATER USE
rjwrfJwwwwjwwmwjwrrtwmwTfJwwwwjwwmwjwrrtwmwrfJwwwwrtWJWwmwjwfrtwniwrfJwwrtWJWwmwjYtf mwwftwwvywwrtwrtwyi Ywwvvvwwvvavwvwvvvvwvwyn YvwwvvvvvwvwvyvwvvvvvYrtvvvu vftvivywwwy vwwyvv«vwvwvrtwwv«vwvwvyvdvkvwvyvi rwvawwwvvwwvwvvwwrt WiViViVVViViViViViVViVi CITY OF ONTARIO Potable Water Master Plan Update
3437
4-11 R:Rpts\\Ontario, City of|2020_Water Master Plan
Table 4-8 (Continued)
Potable Water Unit Demand Factors
4-7.3 Future Demands -9 by zone.
Generally, the ADD were increased with the factors included in Table 4-6 to develop the Maximum Day Demands (MDD), which are summarized by zone in Table 4-7. It should be noted that the MDD model demands for the high water users are based on actual field data collected during the calibration period, and they are not estimated with the MDD peaking factor included in Table 4-6. The MDD total 48,051 AFY (42.9 mgd; 29,790 gpm).
Table 4-9
Future Water demands by Zone
gpd unit gpd/ac gpd/du
Public
Public Facility (w/o RW) PF 3,040
Public Facility (w/ RW) PF - - 1,700 -
Public Middle or High School (w/o RW) PS - - 50 gpd/student 3,500 - Public Middle or High School (w/RW) PS - - 10 gpd/student 1,800 - Public Elementary School (w/o RW) PS - - 30 gpd/student 3,500 - Public Elementary School (w/RW) PS - - 10 gpd/student 1,800 - 3Unit Flow Factor Abbreviations:
ac = acre du = dwelling unit gpd = gallons per day
room = hotel/motel room stu = student tsf = thousand square feet 2Density per the City's 2010 General Plan (The Ontario Plan) 4 If possible it is recommended to use 130 - 155 gpd/room on a case by case basis. It is difficult to estimate the number of rooms or square footage per acre. 5Mixed Use demands should be based on the types of landuse that make up the specific area and the unit demand factors provided above. The City's 2010 General Plan (The Ontario Plan) provides detailed information on the landuses that make up each mixed use area.
- 1Max Density per the City's 2010 General Plan (The Ontario Plan) for OMC without recycled water. Density for LDR, LMDR, MDR, and HDR with recycled water (Ontario Ranch) were increased per the City Planning Department recommendation (March 2016).
Landuse
Max
Density
(du/ac)1
Density
(people/
du)2
Domestic Water Unit Demand
Factors3
gpm mgd AFY
% of
Total gpm mgd AFY
% of
Total
1348 2,137 3.08 3,446 6.0% 3,398 4.89 5,481 6.2%
1212 11,298 16.27 18,224 31.6% 17,481 25.17 28,196 31.9% 1074 4,103 5.91 6,618 11.5% 6,361 9.16 10,261 11.6%
1010 6,292 9.06 10,149 17.6% 9,706 13.98 15,657 17.7%
925 11,886 17.12 19,172 33.3% 17,831 25.68 28,762 32.6% Total 35,716 51.43 57,610 100.0% 54,778 78.88 88,357 100.0% 1 MDD for high water users model demands are based on actual field data collected, not MDD peaking factors included in Table 4-6
Zone
Average Day Demand Maximum Day Demand1
WATER USE
The City of Ontario’s Future water system demands utilized in this study are detailed in Table 4 CITY OF ONTARIO Potable Water Master Plan Update
3438
4-12 R:Rpts\\Ontario, City of|2020_Water Master Plan
The increase in future water demand is due to development of Ontario Ranch, anticipated densification in land will be fully occupied (vacant land will be built upon and occupied).
The total water maximum day demand for the future system is estimated 54,778 gpm (78.88 mgd; 88,357 AFY).
This Subsection describes the process of developing the future system demands for the areas that are going to be developed or redeveloped and distributing the demands in the hydraulic model. The existing demands remained the same unless an area was going to be redeveloped.
In summary, the following steps were used to estimate the future demands:
1. Existing meter data was used for existing uses.
2. Used Water Demand Factors included in Table 4-7 to estimate demand for the vacant and future densification areas. In areas of redevelopment the existing demands were updated with the estimated flows for the future development.
3. Appendix 4-1) provided the population and job
estimates for all future mixed use areas as defined by the Ontario Plan (General Plan). The unit flow factors provided in Table 4-7 were used to estimate the total average day water demand for mixed use areas. Any existing water demands were deducted from the total future average water demand estimate. If the existing demands were greater than the calculated future demands, the existing water demand was maintained in the hydraulic model. The difference was then applied to the hydraulic model in the specific mixed use area.
4. In the Original Model Colony, future average water demands were calculated for currently vacant parcels, assuming that they will be developed in the future per the land use designated in the General Plan. The parcel acreage and the water demand factors provided in Table 4-7 were utilized to estimate the total water demand.
5. All available specific plans and other more current planning information were utilized for Ontario Ranch.
The specific plan areas are shown on Figure 4-6. The City compiled the information and provided table specifying the proposed land uses (Appendix 4-1: Ontario Ranch Proposed Land Uses per Specific Plans). The detailed land use information and the water demand factors provided in Table 4-7 were utilized for calculating the future water demands. Demands were applied to the nearest model junction.
If less than 50 percent of a specific plan area was constructed at the time of this study, all existing water demand was removed and replaced with the projected future water demand. If a specific plan area was mostly constructed, the difference in existing and future water demand was added to the model in that particular area.
6. On the west side of Ontario Ranch, where no specific plans yet exist, the future water demands were calculated utilizing the General Plan land uses, parcel acreages, and the water demand factors provided in Table 4-7. Demands were applied to the nearest model junction.
WATER USE
use and population per the City’s 2010 General Plan, and the assumption that the area within the service area The “City Buildout Table” approved in April 2015 (
CITY OF ONTARIO Potable Water Master Plan Update
3439
3440
4-14 R:Rpts\\Ontario, City of|2020_Water Master Plan
4-8 Recycled Water
recycled water use was 9,653 AFY (3,042 gpm) in Fiscal Year 2018. The recycled water is supplied by Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA). Recycled water treatment plants are conveyed through .
there are approximately 370 recycled customer meters in the City. s Recycled Water Master Plan was last updated in April 2006. It is being updated concurrent to this master plan. Potable water customers that are anticipated to be converted to the recycled water system in the future will be identified as part of the recycled water master plan update. 4-9 Water Conservation
Title 6, Chapter 8A, The Emergency
conservation issues. The reference for this Chapter is Ordinance 2907, which became effective June 16, 2009.
Voluntary conservation is encouraged to limit the amount of water used to the amount absolutely necessary for health, business, and irrigation. The following elements of conservation apply at all times on a voluntary basis:
Avoid hose washing of sidewalks, walkways, driveways, parking areas or other paved surfaces, except as required for sanitary purposes.
Wash motor vehicles, trailers, boats and other types of mobile equipment using a hand held bucket or a hose equipped with a positive shutoff nozzle for quick rinses, or at the immediate premises of a commercial car wash or with recycled wastewater for approved uses.
Avoid using water to clean, fill or maintain levels in decorative fountains, ponds, lakes or other similar aesthetic structures unless such water is part of a recycling system.
Encourage restaurants, hotels, cafés, cafeterias or other public places where food is sold, served or offered for sale, to serve drinking water only to those customers expressly requesting water.
Promptly repair all leaks from indoor and outdoor plumbing fixtures.
Avoid watering lawn, landscape or other turf area more often than every other day and during the hours between 6:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.
Avoid causing or allowing the water to run off landscape areas into adjoining streets, sidewalks or other paved areas due to incorrectly directed or maintained sprinklers or excessive watering.
The City maintains water conservation information on their website for viewing by the public. Information includes water use efficiency and conservation tips, links to other websites pertaining to water conservation, area. Indoor and outdoor rebates are also offered to commercial businesses 4-9.1 California Water Conservation
A variety of executive orders have been issued since 2009 regarding water conservation in the state of California. The following is a brief summary:
1. November 2009 Senate Bill SBx7-7 (i.e. The Water Conservation Act of 2009) enacted Requires State of California Department of Water Resources (DWR) in consultation with other state agencies, to develop a single standardized water use reporting form that can be used by both urban and agricultural water agencies.
For urban water conservation, the legislation sets an overall goal of reducing per capita urban water use by 20 percent by December 31, 2020.
2. April 2014 Proclamation
Governor declares a drought State of Emergency to exist in California due to severe drought conditions.
WATER USE
The City’s
from lEUA’s
lEUA’s pipe conveyance system to the City’s recycled distribution system According to the City’s billing data The City
Water Conservation Plan of the City’s Municipal Code addresses water >
>
>
>
>
>
>
and links to lEUA’s website where indoor and outdoor rebates are offered for residents of the IEUA service >
>
>
CITY OF ONTARIO Potable Water Master Plan Update
3441
4-15 R:Rpts\\Ontario, City of|2020_Water Master Plan
Calls on Californians to reduce their water usage by 20 percent.
Suspends California Environmental Quality Act to allow the emergency regulation and other actions to take place as quickly as possible
3. December 2014 - Executive Order B-28-14
Extends the California Environmental Quality Act suspension through May 2016
4. April 2015 - Executive Order B-29-15
Imposes restrictions on urban water suppliers to achieve a statewide 25 percent reduction in potable urban usage through February 2016
Requires commercial, industrial, and institutional users to implement water efficiency measures Prohibits irrigation with potable water of ornamental turf in public street medians Prohibits irrigation with potable water outside newly constructed homes and buildings that is not delivered by drip or microspray systems
Directs urban suppliers to develop rate structures and other pricing mechanisms to promote water conservation
Requires urban suppliers to increase enforcement against water waste
5. November 2015 Executive Order B-26-15
Directs State agencies to prioritize and accelerate approvals for projects that enhance the ability of a local or state agency to capture high precipitation events Extends drought restrictions through October 2016
6. May 2016 - Executive Order B-37-16
Aims
Californians adopt permanent changes to use water more wisely.
Directs the State Water Resources Control Board to develop new mandatory water conservation regulations
Directs the Department of Water Resources to update new water use targets for urban water agencies. These new targets will build upon the existing requirement to achieve 20% reduction in usage by 2020. The executive order states that new targets would be developed no later than 2020, with the goal of reaching full compliance by 2025.
Directs the State Water Resources Control Board to eliminate water waste by i. permanently prohibits practices that waste potable water ii. directing actions to minimize water system leaks
iii. directing urban and agricultural water suppliers to accelerate data collection, improve water system management and prioritize capital projects to reduce water waste Directs the Department of Water Resources to strengthen local drought resilience by updating requirements for Water Shortage Contingency Plans
Directs the Department of Water Resources to improve agricultural water use efficiency and drought planning
7. April 2017 Executive Order B-40-17 was issued
Terminates the January 17, 2014 Drought State of Emergency Rescinds Executive Orders B-26-14, B-28-14, B-29-15, and B-36-15
WATER USE
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> to bolster California’s climate and drought resilience by instructing State agencies to help >
>
>
>
>
>
>
CITY OF ONTARIO Potable Water Master Plan Update
3442
4-16 R:Rpts\\Ontario, City of|2020_Water Master Plan
Most of Executive Order B-37-16 (Making Water Conservation a California Way of Life) remains in full force. The Department of Water Resources and State Water Resources Control Board continues to:
i. develop permanent prohibitions on wasteful water use and requirements for reporting water use by urban water agencies. Permanent restrictions include:
Hosing off sidewalks, driveways and other hardscapes
Washing automobiles with hoses not equipped with shut-off nozzle Using non-recirculated water in a fountain or other decorative water feature Watering lawns in a manner that causes runoff, or within 48 hours after measurable precipitation
Irrigating ornamental turf on public street medians
ii. develop standards that urban water suppliers will use to set new urban water use efficiency targets
iii. direct actions to minimize water system leaks that waste large amounts of water. iv. direct urban and agricultural water suppliers to accelerate their data collection, improve water system management, and prioritize capital projects to reduce water waste v. work with agencies and suppliers to identify mechanisms that would encourage and facilitate the adoption of rate structures and other pricing mechanisms that promote water conservation
8. Assembly Bill No. 606 May 31, 2018
authorizes State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), along with the Department of Water Resources (DWR) to issue regulation requiring wholesale water suppliers, urban retail water suppliers, or distributors of public water supply to submit information relating to water production, water use, or water conservation.
require urban water suppliers to submit a urban water usage objective report by November 1, 2023
updates the requirements of the urban water management plans
9. Assembly Bill No. 1668 May 31, 2018
authorizes State Water Board, along with the Department of Water Resources (DWR) to issue regulation requiring wholesale water suppliers, urban retail water suppliers, or distributors of public water supply to submit information relating to water production, water use, or water conservation.
establishes 55 gallons per capita daily as the standard for indoor residential water use beginning January 1, 2025 and 50 gallons per capita daily beginning January 1, 2030 require DWR and SWRCB to adopt standards to monitor the performance of commercial, industrial, and institutional water use.
Includes penalties of $1,000 to $10,000 per day to the water supplier for violations to this order
WATER USE
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
CITY OF ONTARIO Potable Water Master Plan Update
3443
'''
''
'
''
'
'
''
''
'
''
)"
)"
)"
)"
)"
)"
)"
)"
)"
)" )"
)"
)"
)"
)"
)"
)"
)"
)"
)"
)"
)"
)"
)" )"
)"
)"
)"
)"
)"
)"
)"
)"
)" )"
)"
)"
)"
)"
)"
)"
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
+$
+$
+$
+$
+$+$
+$
+$+$
+$
+$ +$
+$
+$
+$ +$
+$
+$
+$
+$ +$
+$
+$
+$
+$
SIXTH ST
FIFTH ST
G ST
HOLT BLVD
MISSION BLVD
FRANCIS ST
PHILADELPHIA ST
RIVERSIDE DR
F
ERN ST
E
UCLID AVE
RIVERSIDE DR
MISSION BLVD
PHILADELPHIA ST
AIRPORT DR
I-10 FWY
ONTARIO MILLS PKWY
FOURTH ST
ETIWANDA AVE
IT15 FWY
URNER AVE
A
RCHIBALD AVE
EIGHTH ST
G
ROVE AVE
C
AMPUS AVE
E
UCLID AVE
S
AN ANTONIO AVE
M
OUNTAIN AVE
I-10 FWY
STATE ST
PHILLIPS ST
MILLIKEN AVE
JURUPA ST
H
AVEN AVE
MILLIKEN AVE
SIXTH ST
B
AKER AVE
VINEYARD AVE
FOURTH ST
I ST
B
ENSON AVE
B
ENSON AVE
M
AGNOLIA AVE
C
YPRESS AVE
WALNUT ST
C
UCAMONGA CREEK
TURNER AVE
SR-60
SR-60
New Model Colony
VINTAGE AVE
WINEVILLE AVE
I-15 FWY
Mission Blvd
Ontario International
Airport
Landfill
Riverside
County
City of
Fonatana
City of
Rancho
Cucamonga
City of
Upland
City of
Montclair
City of
Chino
C
AMPUS AVE
B
ON VIEW AVE
C
UCAMONGA AVE
GROVE AVE
BAKER AVE
VINEYARD AVE
S
ULTANA AVE
PARCO AVE
WALKER AVE
CUCAMONGA CREEK
A
RCHIBALD AVE
H
AVEN AVE
MILLIKEN AVE
E
UCLID AVE
CHINO AVE
SCHAEFER AVE
EDISON AVE
EUCALYPTUS AVE
MERRILL AVE
CLEVELAND AVE
4 52
44 Old
Model Colony
27 49
PRS14
S-8
9 &-
T-7
12"
T-1
12"
T-3
18"
T-3
18"
T-6
42" T-5
30"
T-4
24"
T-5
30"
T-1
12"
T-4
24"
T-2
18"
T-5
30"
P-13
16"
P-12
12"
P-18
8"
P-15
6"
P-17
6"
P-16
10"
12"
P-11
12"
P-5
18"
P-4
18"
P-3
30"
P-3
30" P-2
30"
P-1
20"
P-1
20"
ST-4
RES1212-4B
ST-5
30"
%,
R-12
%,
R-11
%,
R-14
%,
R-13
S-16
18"
S-17
24"
S-21
18"
S-18
30"
S-24
18"
S-28
S-29
56 S-33
S-34
57 S-38
18"
S-30
30"
S-32
30"
S-35
18"
T-9
18"
T-7
12"
T-7
12"
T-9
18"
T-7
12"
T-9
18"
T-7
12"
T-7
12"
T-9
18"
T-9
18"
T-9
18"
T-9
18"
T-9
18"
T-9
18" T-9
18"
T-7
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12" T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12" T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-5
30"
T-1
12"
T-4
24" T-4
24"
T-4
24"
T-4
24"
T-4
24"
T-4
24"
T-4
24"
T-4
24"
T-2
18"
T-4
24"
T-7
42"
FF-2
FF-3 FF-3 FF-3
FF-3
FF-3 FF-3
FF-3
FF-37
FF-5
FF-5
FF-5 FF-5
FF-6
FF-6
FF-7
FF-10
FF-10
FF-10
FF-13
FF-27
FF-28
FF-30
FF-37
FF-75
FF-62
FF-65 FF-65
FF-77
FF-69
FF-74
FF-77
S-14
S-15
48 RES925-2B
ST-10
S-40
S-22
S-23
54 Deodar St Jasmine Ct
Fuchsia Av
Elderberry Av
Hawthorne St
La Deney Dr.
Granite Av.
Boulder Av.
Armsley Sq.
Fifth St.
Caroline Ct.
Deodar St.
Sultana Av.
La Deney Dr. P easant Av. l
Yale St.
Deodar St.
Eleventh Av.
Richland St.
Sixth St.
I-10 FWY
Seventh St.
Virginia Av.
Fifth St.
Yale St.
Virginia Av.
Dorado Av.
Baker Av.
Princeton St.
Mariposa Av.
Fourth St.
Harvard Pl.
D St.
El Morado Ct.
Allyn Av.
Greenwood Av.
State St.
Cucamonga Av.
Grove Pl.
Ontario Blvd.
Washington St.
Taylor Av.
California St.
Kern St.
Maitland St.
Campus Av.
Raltson St.
Mission Blvd.
Greenwood Av.
Woodlawn St.
Belmont St.
Cucamonga Av.
Grove Av.
Bon View Av.
Francis St.
Budd St.
Anza Cr.
Francis St.
Cedar St.
Redwood Av.
Laroda Ct.
Oaks Av.
Helen Av.
Helen Av.
Oaks Av.
Haven Ct.
G St
Emporia St.
P um Av. l
D St.
Transit St.
E St.
E St.
F St.
B St.
Laurel Av.
Emporia St.
State St.
Sunkist St.
Vesta St.
Hollowel St Boulder Av.
Palmetto Av.
E St.
Brooks St.
B St.
Magnolia Av.
Mission Blvd.
Oaks Av.
FF-28
Holt Blvd
Airport Dr.
Vineyard Ave.
Moore Way.
I St.
Rosewood Ct.
Berkeley Ct.
J St. Rosewood Ct.
Elderberry Ave.
Airport Dr.
Doubleday Ave.
Jurupa St.
Dupont Ave.
Inland Empire
Blvd.
Francis St.
Baker Ave.
Fourth St.
Rosewood Ct.
Vine Ave.
College Wy.
Cloumbia Ave.
FF-19
Cypress Av.
Fifth St.
FF-70
FF-70
FF-21
Princeton St.
Jurupa St.
Archibald Av.
Harvard Pl.
WFA
Conn
WFA
Conn
CDA II
Conn
CDA II
Conn
CDA I
Conn
T-8
18"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12" T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12" T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-1
12"
T-9
18"
T-9
18" T-9
18"
T-1
12"
T-9
18"
P-6
18"
P-7
18"
P-8
24"
46 S-12
S-40
S-32
30"
ST-3
RES1212-4A
ST-9
RES
925-1B
ST-8
RES
925-1A
RES925-2A
ST-1
ST-6
RES1212-3
O-2
RES1010-1
RES1010-2B
RES1010-2A
RES1074-1B
RES1074-1A
RES1212-1B
RES1212-1A
RES1348-1C
RES1348-1B
O-1
RES1348-1A
S-13
AV3
AV2
AV1
PRS9
PRS8 PRS7
PRS6
PRS5
PRS4
PRS3 PRS2
PRS18
PRS19
P-14
PRS23
P-10
PRS22
P-9
PRS21
PRS17
S-39
PRS16
PRS15
PRS12 PRS13
PRS11
PRS10
BP-1
BP-9
BP-4
BP-3
BP-2
BP-ONTARIO
39 R-1
SAW
Conn
WFA
Agua de Lejos
Water Treatment Plant
3 50
S-7
11 19
18 S-10
16 S-9
15 S-36
S-37
58 S-25
S-26
55 S-19
S-20
51 S-1
43 S-2
42 47
45 41
40 20
26 38
36 35 30
25 17
34 31
24 29 37
FF-3
FF-65
FF-6
FF-10
FF-39
FF-50
FF-5
FF-47
FF-7
FF-20
FF-19
FF-12
FF-52
FF-73
FF-2
FF-4
FF-53
FF-45
FF-46
FF-1
FF-60
FF-55
F
F-72
FF-38
FF-8
FF-64
FF-22
FF-44
FF-42
FF-25
FF-35
FF-18
FF-68
FF-58
FF-43
FF-48
FF-29
FF-17
FF-56
FF-61
FF-51
FF-59
FF-36
FF-49
FF-67
FF-15 FF-31
FF-24
FF-57
FF-34
FF-71
FF-23
FF-40
FF-54
FF-11
FF-14
FF-16
FF-26
FF-33
FF-41
FF-63
FF-32
FF-8
0 1,500 3,000 6,000
Feet
³
1"=1500'
+$
+$
*#
)"
)"
'
'
8" Fire Flow Pipe Improvement
12" Fire Flow Pipe Improvement
16" Fire Flow Pipe Improvement
Recommended Emergency Connection
Recommended Altitude Valve/PRS
Altitude Vavle/PRS
Booster Pump Station
Recommended Well
Well
Recommended Reservoir
Reservoir
Recommended Improvement Pipe
Recommended Pipe for 1010 Zone Expansion
Recommended Pipe for 925 Zone
Existing Pipe
Other Agency Pipe
City Boundary
925 Pressure Zone
1010 Pressure Zone
1074 Pressure Zone
1212 Pressure Zone
1348 Pressure Zone
%,
Legend
Small Diameter Pipe Improvement (O-9)
Pipe Improvement due to Age (O-8)
Figure 1-7
PROJECT NO: 1000919.00
DATE: April 2012
CITY OF ONTARIO
WATER MASTER PLAN
Capital Improvement Project
Locations
3444
APPENDIX B
PRIVATE WATER REFERENCE
3445
3446
3447
3448
3449
3450
3451
3452
3453
3454
3455
3456
3457
APPENDIX C
COMPUTER MODELING OUTPUT
The following conditions were modeled:
0. Average Day Demand
1. Peak Hour Demand
2. Maximum Day Demand plus 1,500 gpm Fire Flow at Node 123
3. Maximum Day Demand plus 1,500 gpm Fire Flow at Node 125
4. Peak Domestic Demand – WFU Based
• Node and Pipe Diagram – Exhibit A
3458
Esperanza PA 11 (Ontario East) Project April 17, 2025
City of Ontario Dexter Wilson Eng., Inc.
Computer Hydraulic Model Job 1551-001
Appendix C
* * * * * * * * * * * * K Y P I P E * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Pipe Network Modeling Software *
* *
* CopyRighted by KYPIPE LLC (www.kypipe.com) *
* Version: 12.009b 03-25-2024 *
* Company: DEXWIL Serial #: 580753 *
* Interface: Classic *
* Licensed for Pipe2018 *
* *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Date & Time: Thu Apr 17 14:59:08 2025
Master File : k:\1551001\esperanza pa 11 ky pipe jan 2025.KYP\esperanza pa 11 ky pipe jan 2025.P2K
************************************************
S U M M A R Y O F O R I G I N A L D A T A
************************************************
U N I T S S P E C I F I E D
FLOWRATE ............ = gallons/minute
HEAD (HGL) .......... = feet
PRESSURE ............ = psig
P I P E L I N E D A T A
STATUS CODE: XX -CLOSED PIPE CV -CHECK VALVE
P I P E NODE NAMES LENGTH DIAMETER ROUGHNESS MINOR
N A M E #1 #2 (ft) (in) COEFF. LOSS COEFF.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- P-1 J-1 J-7 950.00 24.00 120.0000 0.00
P-2 J-1 FF Test 5000.00 24.00 120.0000 0.00
P-3 J-3 J-1 350.00 12.00 120.0000 0.00
P-4 J-4 J-3 620.00 8.00 120.0000 0.00
P-5 J-5 J-4 290.00 8.00 120.0000 0.00
P-6 J-6 J-5 410.00 8.00 120.0000 0.00
P-7 J-7 J-6 470.00 8.00 120.0000 0.00
P-8 J-3 I-BF-1 20.00 8.00 120.0000 1.50
P-9 J-9 J-8 260.00 4.00 120.0000 1.40
P-10 J-9 J-10 120.00 6.00 120.0000 1.40
P-11 J-5 I-Meter 1 20.00 6.00 120.0000 2.50
P-12 J-10 J-11 240.00 6.00 120.0000 1.75
P-13 J-11 J-13 90.00 6.00 120.0000 0.75
P-14 J-13 J-14 120.00 6.00 120.0000 0.75
P-15 J-14 J-12 160.00 6.00 120.0000 1.15
P-16 J-12 J-15 190.00 4.00 120.0000 1.40
P-17 J-12 J-16 300.00 6.00 120.0000 1.00
P-18 J-16 J-17 170.00 4.00 120.0000 1.00
P-19 J-16 J-18 410.00 6.00 120.0000 1.40
P-20 J-18 J-19 170.00 4.00 120.0000 1.00
P-21 J-9 J-18 370.00 6.00 120.0000 0.40
P-23 O-BF-1 J-121 200.00 8.00 120.0000 1.50
P-24 O-Meter 1 J-10 200.00 6.00 120.0000 1.50
P-25 J-5 I-BF-2 20.00 8.00 120.0000 0.00
P-26 O-BF-2 J-122 250.00 8.00 120.0000 0.00
P-127 J-122 J-121 340.00 8.00 120.0000 1.40
P-128 J-121 J-123 500.00 8.00 120.0000 3.00
P-131 J-125 J-122 350.00 8.00 120.0000 4.50
3459
Esperanza PA 11 (Ontario East) Project April 17, 2025
City of Ontario Dexter Wilson Eng., Inc.
Computer Hydraulic Model Job 1551-001
Appendix C
P U M P/L O S S E L E M E N T D A T A
THERE IS A DEVICE AT NODE Meter 1 DESCRIBED BY THE FOLLOWING DATA: (ID= 2)
HEAD FLOWRATE EFFICIENCY
(ft) (gpm) (%)
-18.46 0.00 75.00 (Default)
-19.62 200.00 75.00 (Default)
-20.77 400.00 75.00 (Default)
-21.92 600.00 75.00 (Default)
-23.08 800.00 75.00 (Default)
THERE IS A DEVICE AT NODE BF-1 DESCRIBED BY THE FOLLOWING DATA: (ID= 1)
HEAD FLOWRATE EFFICIENCY
(ft) (gpm) (%)
-16.15 0.00 75.00 (Default)
-18.46 500.00 75.00 (Default)
-20.77 1000.00 75.00 (Default)
-23.08 1500.00 75.00 (Default)
-25.38 2000.00 75.00 (Default)
THERE IS A DEVICE AT NODE BF-2 ...............................> (ID= 1)
N O D E D A T A
NODE NODE EXTERNAL JUNCTION EXTERNAL
NAME TITLE DEMAND ELEVATION GRADE
(gpm) (ft) (ft)
-------------------------------------------------------------- FF Test ---- 0.00 886.00
O-Meter 1 0.00 712.00
O-BF-1 0.00 707.00
O-BF-2 0.00 712.00
J-1 0.00 705.00
J-3 0.00 707.00
J-4 0.00 711.00
J-5 0.00 712.00
J-6 0.00 715.00
J-7 0.00 715.00
J-8 3.00 709.00
J-9 3.00 708.00
J-10 3.00 710.00
J-11 3.00 710.00
J-12 3.00 709.00
J-13 3.00 711.00
J-14 3.00 711.00
J-15 3.00 709.00
J-16 3.00 708.00
J-17 3.00 708.00
J-18 3.00 706.00
J-19 3.00 706.00
J-121 0.00 708.00
J-122 0.00 710.00
J-123 0.00 710.00
J-125 0.00 711.00
I-Meter 1 0.00 712.00
I-BF-1 0.00 707.00
I-BF-2 0.00 712.00
3460
Esperanza PA 11 (Ontario East) Project April 17, 2025
City of Ontario Dexter Wilson Eng., Inc.
Computer Hydraulic Model Job 1551-001
Appendix C
O U T P U T O P T I O N D A T A
OUTPUT SELECTION: ALL RESULTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE TABULATED OUTPUT MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM PRESSURES = 3
MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM VELOCITIES = 3
S Y S T E M C O N F I G U R A T I O N
NUMBER OF PIPES ...................(P) = 28
NUMBER OF END NODES ...............(J) = 25
NUMBER OF PRIMARY LOOPS ...........(L) = 3
NUMBER OF SUPPLY NODES ............(F) = 1
NUMBER OF SUPPLY ZONES ............(Z) = 1
================================================================================ Case: 0
RESULTS OBTAINED AFTER 200 TRIALS: ACCURACY = 0.13216E+01
AVERAGE DAY DEMAND
S I M U L A T I O N D E S C R I P T I O N (L A B E L)
P I P E L I N E R E S U L T S
STATUS CODE: XX -CLOSED PIPE CV -CHECK VALVE
P I P E NODE NUMBERS FLOWRATE HEAD MINOR LINE HL+ML/ HL/ N A M E #1 #2 LOSS LOSS VELO. 1000 1000
gpm ft ft ft/s ft/f ft/f
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- P-1 J-1 J-7 45.45 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00
P-2 J-1 FF Test -36.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00
P-3 J-3 J-1 9.45 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00
P-4 J-4 J-3 124.30 0.28 0.00 0.79 0.45 0.45
P-5 J-5 J-4 124.30 0.13 0.00 0.79 0.45 0.45
P-6 J-6 J-5 45.45 0.03 0.00 0.29 0.07 0.07
P-7 J-7 J-6 45.45 0.03 0.00 0.29 0.07 0.07
P-8 J-3 I-BF-1 114.85 0.01 0.01 0.73 1.01 0.38
P-9 J-9 J-8 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.01 0.01
P-10 J-9 J-10 -17.25 0.01 0.00 0.20 0.05 0.05
P-11 J-5 I-Meter 1 36.00 0.00 0.01 0.41 0.51 0.18
P-12 J-10 J-11 15.75 0.01 0.00 0.18 0.04 0.04
P-13 J-11 J-13 12.75 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.03 0.03
P-14 J-13 J-14 9.75 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.02 0.02
P-15 J-14 J-12 6.75 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.01 0.01
P-16 J-12 J-15 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.01 0.01
P-17 J-12 J-16 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00
P-18 J-16 J-17 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.01 0.01
P-19 J-16 J-18 -5.25 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.01 0.01
P-20 J-18 J-19 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.01 0.01
P-21 J-9 J-18 11.25 0.01 0.00 0.13 0.02 0.02
P-23 O-BF-1 J-121 114.85 0.08 0.01 0.73 0.45 0.38
P-24 O-Meter 1 J-10 36.00 0.04 0.00 0.41 0.20 0.18
P-25 J-5 I-BF-2 -114.85 0.01 0.00 0.73 0.38 0.38
P-26 O-BF-2 J-122 -114.85 0.10 0.00 0.73 0.38 0.38
P-127 J-122 J-121 -114.85 0.13 0.01 0.73 0.42 0.38
P-128 J-121 J-123 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
P-131 J-125 J-122 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3461
Esperanza PA 11 (Ontario East) Project April 17, 2025
City of Ontario Dexter Wilson Eng., Inc.
Computer Hydraulic Model Job 1551-001
Appendix C
P U M P/L O S S E L E M E N T R E S U L T S
INLET OUTLET PUMP EFFIC- USEFUL INCREMTL TOTAL #PUMPS #PUMPS NPSH Case NAME FLOWRATE HEAD HEAD HEAD ENCY POWER COST COST PARALLEL SERIES Avail. gpm ft ft ft % Hp $ $ ft
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Meter 1 36.00 173.93 155.26 -18.7 75.00 0. 0.0 0.0 ** ** 207.1 0.0000 BF-1 114.85 178.98 162.30 -16.7 75.00 0. 0.0 0.0 ** ** 212.2 0.0000 Warning P2K107:Device BF-2 is operating out of range.
BF-2 -114.85 173.95 158.32 -15.6 75.00 0. 0.0 0.0 ** ** 207.1 0.0000
N O D E R E S U L T S
NODE NODE EXTERNAL HYDRAULIC NODE PRESSURE NODE
NAME TITLE DEMAND GRADE ELEVATION HEAD PRESSURE
gpm ft ft ft psi
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FF Test ---- 886.00
O-Meter 1 0.00 867.26 712.00 155.26 67.28
O-BF-1 0.00 869.30 707.00 162.30 70.33
O-BF-2 0.00 870.32 712.00 158.32 68.61
J-1 0.00 886.00 705.00 181.00 78.43
J-3 0.00 886.00 707.00 179.00 77.57
J-4 0.00 886.28 711.00 175.28 75.95
J-5 0.00 885.94 712.00 173.94 75.37
J-6 0.00 885.97 715.00 170.97 74.09
J-7 0.00 886.00 715.00 171.00 74.10
J-8 3.00 867.21 709.00 158.21 68.56
J-9 3.00 867.21 708.00 159.21 68.99
J-10 3.00 867.22 710.00 157.22 68.13
J-11 3.00 867.21 710.00 157.21 68.12
J-12 3.00 867.20 709.00 158.20 68.55
J-13 3.00 867.21 711.00 156.21 67.69
J-14 3.00 867.20 711.00 156.20 67.69
J-15 3.00 867.20 709.00 158.20 68.55
J-16 3.00 867.20 708.00 159.20 68.99
J-17 3.00 867.20 708.00 159.20 68.99
J-18 3.00 867.20 706.00 161.20 69.85
J-19 3.00 867.20 706.00 161.20 69.85
J-121 0.00 869.21 708.00 161.21 69.86
J-122 0.00 869.06 710.00 159.06 68.93
J-123 0.00 869.21 710.00 159.21 68.99
J-125 0.00 869.06 711.00 158.06 68.49
I-Meter 1 0.00 885.93 712.00 173.93 75.37
I-BF-1 0.00 885.98 707.00 178.98 77.56
I-BF-2 0.00 885.95 712.00 173.95 75.38
M A X I M U M A N D M I N I M U M V A L U E S
P R E S S U R E S
JUNCTION MAXIMUM JUNCTION MINIMUM
NUMBER PRESSURES NUMBER PRESSURES
psi psi
--------------------- ---------------------
J-1 78.43 O-Meter 1 67.28
J-3 77.57 J-14 67.69
I-BF-1 77.56 J-13 67.69
3462
Esperanza PA 11 (Ontario East) Project April 17, 2025
City of Ontario Dexter Wilson Eng., Inc.
Computer Hydraulic Model Job 1551-001
Appendix C
V E L O C I T I E S
PIPE MAXIMUM PIPE MINIMUM
NUMBER VELOCITY NUMBER VELOCITY
(ft/s) (ft/s)
--------------------- ---------------------
P-4 0.79 P-17 0.01
P-5 0.79 P-2 0.03
P-8 0.73 P-3 0.03
S U M M A R Y O F I N F L O W S A N D O U T F L O W S
(+) INFLOWS INTO THE SYSTEM FROM SUPPLY NODES
(-) OUTFLOWS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO SUPPLY NODES
NODE FLOWRATE NODE
NAME gpm TITLE
--------------------------------------------
FF Test 36.00
NET SYSTEM INFLOW = 36.00
NET SYSTEM OUTFLOW = 0.00
NET SYSTEM DEMAND = 36.00
================================================================================ Case: 1
C H A N G E S F O R N E X T S I M U L A T I O N (Change Number = 1 )
Peak Hour Demand
JUNCTION DEMANDS CHANGED - PLEASE SEE RESULTS TABLE
RESULTS OBTAINED AFTER 200 TRIALS: ACCURACY = 0.12917E+01
P I P E L I N E R E S U L T S
STATUS CODE: XX -CLOSED PIPE CV -CHECK VALVE
P I P E NODE NUMBERS FLOWRATE HEAD MINOR LINE HL+ML/ HL/ N A M E #1 #2 LOSS LOSS VELO. 1000 1000
gpm ft ft ft/s ft/f ft/f
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- P-1 J-1 J-7 30.48 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00
P-2 J-1 FF Test -72.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00
P-3 J-3 J-1 -41.52 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.01 0.01
P-4 J-4 J-3 57.65 0.07 0.00 0.37 0.11 0.11
P-5 J-5 J-4 57.65 0.03 0.00 0.37 0.11 0.11
P-6 J-6 J-5 30.48 0.01 0.00 0.19 0.03 0.03
P-7 J-7 J-6 30.48 0.02 0.00 0.19 0.03 0.03
P-8 J-3 I-BF-1 99.17 0.01 0.01 0.63 0.76 0.29
P-9 J-9 J-8 6.00 0.01 0.00 0.15 0.05 0.05
P-10 J-9 J-10 -34.51 0.02 0.00 0.39 0.20 0.17
P-11 J-5 I-Meter 1 72.00 0.01 0.03 0.82 1.95 0.66
P-12 J-10 J-11 31.49 0.03 0.00 0.36 0.16 0.14
P-13 J-11 J-13 25.49 0.01 0.00 0.29 0.11 0.10
3463
Esperanza PA 11 (Ontario East) Project April 17, 2025
City of Ontario Dexter Wilson Eng., Inc.
Computer Hydraulic Model Job 1551-001
Appendix C
P-14 J-13 J-14 19.49 0.01 0.00 0.22 0.06 0.06
P-15 J-14 J-12 13.49 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.03 0.03
P-16 J-12 J-15 6.00 0.01 0.00 0.15 0.05 0.05
P-17 J-12 J-16 1.49 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00
P-18 J-16 J-17 6.00 0.01 0.00 0.15 0.05 0.05
P-19 J-16 J-18 -10.51 0.01 0.00 0.12 0.02 0.02
P-20 J-18 J-19 6.00 0.01 0.00 0.15 0.05 0.05
P-21 J-9 J-18 22.51 0.03 0.00 0.26 0.08 0.08
P-23 O-BF-1 J-121 99.17 0.06 0.01 0.63 0.34 0.29
P-24 O-Meter 1 J-10 72.00 0.13 0.02 0.82 0.74 0.66
P-25 J-5 I-BF-2 -99.17 0.01 0.00 0.63 0.29 0.29
P-26 O-BF-2 J-122 -99.17 0.07 0.00 0.63 0.29 0.29
P-127 J-122 J-121 -99.17 0.10 0.01 0.63 0.32 0.29
P-128 J-121 J-123 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
P-131 J-125 J-122 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
P U M P/L O S S E L E M E N T R E S U L T S
INLET OUTLET PUMP EFFIC- USEFUL INCREMTL TOTAL #PUMPS #PUMPS NPSH Case NAME FLOWRATE HEAD HEAD HEAD ENCY POWER COST COST PARALLEL SERIES Avail. gpm ft ft ft % Hp $ $ ft
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Meter 1 72.00 173.93 155.05 -18.9 75.00 0. 0.0 0.0 ** ** 207.1 1.0000 BF-1 99.17 178.98 162.37 -16.6 75.00 0. 0.0 0.0 ** ** 212.2 1.0000 Warning P2K107:Device BF-2 is operating out of range.
BF-2 -99.17 173.97 158.28 -15.7 75.00 0. 0.0 0.0 ** ** 207.2 1.0000
N O D E R E S U L T S
NODE NODE EXTERNAL HYDRAULIC NODE PRESSURE NODE
NAME TITLE DEMAND GRADE ELEVATION HEAD PRESSURE
gpm ft ft ft psi
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FF Test ---- 886.00
O-Meter 1 0.00 867.05 712.00 155.05 67.19
O-BF-1 0.00 869.37 707.00 162.37 70.36
O-BF-2 0.00 870.28 712.00 158.28 68.59
J-1 0.00 886.00 705.00 181.00 78.43
J-3 0.00 885.99 707.00 178.99 77.56
J-4 0.00 886.06 711.00 175.06 75.86
J-5 0.00 885.97 712.00 173.97 75.39
J-6 0.00 885.98 715.00 170.98 74.09
J-7 0.00 886.00 715.00 171.00 74.10
J-8 6.00(2.00) 866.87 709.00 157.87 68.41
J-9 6.00(2.00) 866.88 708.00 158.88 68.85
J-10 6.00(2.00) 866.90 710.00 156.90 67.99
J-11 6.00(2.00) 866.87 710.00 156.87 67.98
J-12 6.00(2.00) 866.84 709.00 157.84 68.40
J-13 6.00(2.00) 866.86 711.00 155.86 67.54
J-14 6.00(2.00) 866.85 711.00 155.85 67.53
J-15 6.00(2.00) 866.83 709.00 157.83 68.39
J-16 6.00(2.00) 866.84 708.00 158.84 68.83
J-17 6.00(2.00) 866.84 708.00 158.84 68.83
J-18 6.00(2.00) 866.85 706.00 160.85 69.70
J-19 6.00(2.00) 866.84 706.00 160.84 69.70
J-121 0.00 869.30 708.00 161.30 69.90
J-122 0.00 869.19 710.00 159.19 68.98
J-123 0.00 869.30 710.00 159.30 69.03
J-125 0.00 869.19 711.00 158.19 68.55
I-Meter 1 0.00 885.93 712.00 173.93 75.37
I-BF-1 0.00 885.98 707.00 178.98 77.56
I-BF-2 0.00 885.97 712.00 173.97 75.39
3464
Esperanza PA 11 (Ontario East) Project April 17, 2025
City of Ontario Dexter Wilson Eng., Inc.
Computer Hydraulic Model Job 1551-001
Appendix C
M A X I M U M A N D M I N I M U M V A L U E S
P R E S S U R E S
JUNCTION MAXIMUM JUNCTION MINIMUM
NUMBER PRESSURES NUMBER PRESSURES
psi psi
--------------------- ---------------------
J-1 78.43 O-Meter 1 67.19
J-3 77.56 J-14 67.53
I-BF-1 77.56 J-13 67.54
V E L O C I T I E S
PIPE MAXIMUM PIPE MINIMUM
NUMBER VELOCITY NUMBER VELOCITY
(ft/s) (ft/s)
--------------------- ---------------------
P-11 0.82 P-17 0.02
P-24 0.82 P-1 0.02
P-8 0.63 P-2 0.05
S U M M A R Y O F I N F L O W S A N D O U T F L O W S
(+) INFLOWS INTO THE SYSTEM FROM SUPPLY NODES
(-) OUTFLOWS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO SUPPLY NODES
NODE FLOWRATE NODE
NAME gpm TITLE
--------------------------------------------
FF Test 72.00
NET SYSTEM INFLOW = 72.00
NET SYSTEM OUTFLOW = 0.00
NET SYSTEM DEMAND = 72.00
================================================================================ Case: 2
C H A N G E S F O R N E X T S I M U L A T I O N (Change Number = 2 )
Maximum Day Demand plus 1,500 gpm Fire Flow at Node 123
JUNCTION DEMANDS CHANGED - PLEASE SEE RESULTS TABLE
TANK at node FF Test has a new HGL of 837.000
RESULTS OBTAINED AFTER 5 TRIALS: ACCURACY = 0.25646E-05
P I P E L I N E R E S U L T S
STATUS CODE: XX -CLOSED PIPE CV -CHECK VALVE
P I P E NODE NUMBERS FLOWRATE HEAD MINOR LINE HL+ML/ HL/ N A M E #1 #2 LOSS LOSS VELO. 1000 1000
gpm ft ft ft/s ft/f ft/f
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- P-1 J-1 J-7 379.07 0.02 0.00 0.27 0.02 0.02
P-2 J-1 FF Test -1557.60 1.14 0.00 1.10 0.23 0.23
P-3 J-3 J-1 -1178.53 1.40 0.00 3.34 3.99 3.99
3465
Esperanza PA 11 (Ontario East) Project April 17, 2025
City of Ontario Dexter Wilson Eng., Inc.
Computer Hydraulic Model Job 1551-001
Appendix C
P-4 J-4 J-3 -270.60 1.17 0.00 1.73 1.88 1.88
P-5 J-5 J-4 -270.60 0.55 0.00 1.73 1.88 1.88
P-6 J-6 J-5 379.07 1.44 0.00 2.42 3.51 3.51
P-7 J-7 J-6 379.07 1.65 0.00 2.42 3.51 3.51
P-8 J-3 I-BF-1 907.93 0.35 0.78 5.79 56.82 17.72
P-9 J-9 J-8 4.80 0.01 0.00 0.12 0.03 0.03
P-10 J-9 J-10 -27.60 0.01 0.00 0.31 0.13 0.11
P-11 J-5 I-Meter 1 57.60 0.01 0.02 0.65 1.26 0.44
P-12 J-10 J-11 25.20 0.02 0.00 0.29 0.10 0.09
P-13 J-11 J-13 20.40 0.01 0.00 0.23 0.07 0.06
P-14 J-13 J-14 15.60 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.04 0.04
P-15 J-14 J-12 10.80 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.02 0.02
P-16 J-12 J-15 4.80 0.01 0.00 0.12 0.03 0.03
P-17 J-12 J-16 1.20 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00
P-18 J-16 J-17 4.80 0.01 0.00 0.12 0.03 0.03
P-19 J-16 J-18 -8.40 0.01 0.00 0.10 0.01 0.01
P-20 J-18 J-19 4.80 0.01 0.00 0.12 0.03 0.03
P-21 J-9 J-18 18.00 0.02 0.00 0.20 0.05 0.05
P-23 O-BF-1 J-121 907.93 3.54 0.78 5.79 21.63 17.72
P-24 O-Meter 1 J-10 57.60 0.09 0.01 0.65 0.49 0.44
P-25 J-5 I-BF-2 592.07 0.16 0.00 3.78 8.03 8.03
P-26 O-BF-2 J-122 592.07 2.01 0.00 3.78 8.03 8.03
P-127 J-122 J-121 592.07 2.73 0.31 3.78 8.94 8.03
P-128 J-121 J-123 1500.00 22.45 4.27 9.57 53.43 44.89
P-131 J-125 J-122 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
P U M P/L O S S E L E M E N T R E S U L T S
INLET OUTLET PUMP EFFIC- USEFUL INCREMTL TOTAL #PUMPS #PUMPS NPSH Case NAME FLOWRATE HEAD HEAD HEAD ENCY POWER COST COST PARALLEL SERIES Avail. gpm ft ft ft % Hp $ $ ft
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Meter 1 57.60 120.72 101.93 -18.8 75.00 0. 0.0 0.0 ** ** 153.9 2.0000 BF-1 907.93 126.33 105.98 -20.3 75.00 -5. 0.0 -0.1 ** ** 159.0 2.0000 BF-2 592.07 120.59 101.70 -18.9 75.00 -3. 0.0 0.1 ** ** 153.6 2.0000
N O D E R E S U L T S
NODE NODE EXTERNAL HYDRAULIC NODE PRESSURE NODE
NAME TITLE DEMAND GRADE ELEVATION HEAD PRESSURE
gpm ft ft ft psi
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FF Test ---- 837.00
O-Meter 1 0.00 813.93 712.00 101.93 44.17
O-BF-1 0.00 812.98 707.00 105.98 45.93
O-BF-2 0.00 813.70 712.00 101.70 44.07
J-1 0.00 835.86 705.00 130.86 56.70
J-3 0.00 834.46 707.00 127.46 55.23
J-4 0.00 833.29 711.00 122.29 52.99
J-5 0.00 832.75 712.00 120.75 52.32
J-6 0.00 834.19 715.00 119.19 51.65
J-7 0.00 835.84 715.00 120.84 52.36
J-8 4.80(1.60) 813.81 709.00 104.81 45.42
J-9 4.80(1.60) 813.82 708.00 105.82 45.85
J-10 4.80(1.60) 813.83 710.00 103.83 44.99
J-11 4.80(1.60) 813.81 710.00 103.81 44.98
J-12 4.80(1.60) 813.79 709.00 104.79 45.41
J-13 4.80(1.60) 813.80 711.00 102.80 44.55
J-14 4.80(1.60) 813.80 711.00 102.80 44.55
J-15 4.80(1.60) 813.79 709.00 104.79 45.41
J-16 4.80(1.60) 813.79 708.00 105.79 45.84
3466
Esperanza PA 11 (Ontario East) Project April 17, 2025
City of Ontario Dexter Wilson Eng., Inc.
Computer Hydraulic Model Job 1551-001
Appendix C
J-17 4.80(1.60) 813.79 708.00 105.79 45.84
J-18 4.80(1.60) 813.80 706.00 107.80 46.71
J-19 4.80(1.60) 813.79 706.00 107.79 46.71
J-121 0.00 808.66 708.00 100.66 43.62
J-122 0.00 811.70 710.00 101.70 44.07
J-123 1500.00 781.94 710.00 71.94 31.17
J-125 0.00 811.70 711.00 100.70 43.63
I-Meter 1 0.00 832.72 712.00 120.72 52.31
I-BF-1 0.00 833.33 707.00 126.33 54.74
I-BF-2 0.00 832.59 712.00 120.59 52.25
M A X I M U M A N D M I N I M U M V A L U E S
P R E S S U R E S
JUNCTION MAXIMUM JUNCTION MINIMUM
NUMBER PRESSURES NUMBER PRESSURES
psi psi
--------------------- ---------------------
J-1 56.70 J-123 31.17
J-3 55.23 J-121 43.62
I-BF-1 54.74 J-125 43.63
V E L O C I T I E S
PIPE MAXIMUM PIPE MINIMUM
NUMBER VELOCITY NUMBER VELOCITY
(ft/s) (ft/s)
--------------------- ---------------------
P-128 9.57 P-17 0.01
P-8 5.79 P-19 0.10
P-23 5.79 P-15 0.12
S U M M A R Y O F I N F L O W S A N D O U T F L O W S
(+) INFLOWS INTO THE SYSTEM FROM SUPPLY NODES
(-) OUTFLOWS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO SUPPLY NODES
NODE FLOWRATE NODE
NAME gpm TITLE
--------------------------------------------
FF Test 1557.60
NET SYSTEM INFLOW = 1557.60
NET SYSTEM OUTFLOW = 0.00
NET SYSTEM DEMAND = 1557.60
3467
Esperanza PA 11 (Ontario East) Project April 17, 2025
City of Ontario Dexter Wilson Eng., Inc.
Computer Hydraulic Model Job 1551-001
Appendix C
================================================================================ Case: 3
C H A N G E S F O R N E X T S I M U L A T I O N (Change Number = 3 )
Maximum Day Demand plus 1,500 gpm Fire Flow at Node 125
JUNCTION DEMANDS CHANGED - PLEASE SEE RESULTS TABLE
TANK at node FF Test has a new HGL of 837.000
RESULTS OBTAINED AFTER 4 TRIALS: ACCURACY = 0.12494E-05
P I P E L I N E R E S U L T S
STATUS CODE: XX -CLOSED PIPE CV -CHECK VALVE
P I P E NODE NUMBERS FLOWRATE HEAD MINOR LINE HL+ML/ HL/ N A M E #1 #2 LOSS LOSS VELO. 1000 1000
gpm ft ft ft/s ft/f ft/f
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- P-1 J-1 J-7 466.21 0.02 0.00 0.33 0.02 0.02
P-2 J-1 FF Test -1557.60 1.14 0.00 1.10 0.23 0.23
P-3 J-3 J-1 -1091.39 1.21 0.00 3.10 3.46 3.46
P-4 J-4 J-3 -388.68 2.28 0.00 2.48 3.68 3.68
P-5 J-5 J-4 -388.68 1.07 0.00 2.48 3.68 3.68
P-6 J-6 J-5 466.21 2.11 0.00 2.98 5.16 5.16
P-7 J-7 J-6 466.21 2.42 0.00 2.98 5.16 5.16
P-8 J-3 I-BF-1 702.70 0.22 0.47 4.48 34.45 11.02
P-9 J-9 J-8 4.80 0.01 0.00 0.12 0.03 0.03
P-10 J-9 J-10 -27.60 0.01 0.00 0.31 0.13 0.11
P-11 J-5 I-Meter 1 57.60 0.01 0.02 0.65 1.26 0.44
P-12 J-10 J-11 25.20 0.02 0.00 0.29 0.10 0.09
P-13 J-11 J-13 20.40 0.01 0.00 0.23 0.07 0.06
P-14 J-13 J-14 15.60 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.04 0.04
P-15 J-14 J-12 10.80 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.02 0.02
P-16 J-12 J-15 4.80 0.01 0.00 0.12 0.03 0.03
P-17 J-12 J-16 1.20 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00
P-18 J-16 J-17 4.80 0.01 0.00 0.12 0.03 0.03
P-19 J-16 J-18 -8.40 0.01 0.00 0.10 0.01 0.01
P-20 J-18 J-19 4.80 0.01 0.00 0.12 0.03 0.03
P-21 J-9 J-18 18.00 0.02 0.00 0.20 0.05 0.05
P-23 O-BF-1 J-121 702.70 2.20 0.47 4.48 13.37 11.02
P-24 O-Meter 1 J-10 57.60 0.09 0.01 0.65 0.49 0.44
P-25 J-5 I-BF-2 797.30 0.28 0.00 5.09 13.93 13.93
P-26 O-BF-2 J-122 797.30 3.48 0.00 5.09 13.93 13.93
P-127 J-122 J-121 -702.70 3.75 0.44 4.48 12.31 11.02
P-128 J-121 J-123 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
P-131 J-125 J-122 -1500.00 15.71 6.40 9.57 63.19 44.89
3468
Esperanza PA 11 (Ontario East) Project April 17, 2025
City of Ontario Dexter Wilson Eng., Inc.
Computer Hydraulic Model Job 1551-001
Appendix C
P U M P/L O S S E L E M E N T R E S U L T S
INLET OUTLET PUMP EFFIC- USEFUL INCREMTL TOTAL #PUMPS #PUMPS NPSH Case NAME FLOWRATE HEAD HEAD HEAD ENCY POWER COST COST PARALLEL SERIES Avail. gpm ft ft ft % Hp $ $ ft
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Meter 1 57.60 119.27 100.48 -18.8 75.00 0. 0.0 0.0 ** ** 152.5 3.0000 BF-1 702.70 126.96 107.56 -19.4 75.00 -3. -0.2 -0.3 ** ** 159.8 3.0000 BF-2 797.30 119.02 99.18 -19.8 75.00 -4. -0.1 -0.1 ** ** 151.8 3.0000
N O D E R E S U L T S
NODE NODE EXTERNAL HYDRAULIC NODE PRESSURE NODE
NAME TITLE DEMAND GRADE ELEVATION HEAD PRESSURE
gpm ft ft ft psi
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FF Test ---- 837.00
O-Meter 1 0.00 812.48 712.00 100.48 43.54
O-BF-1 0.00 814.56 707.00 107.56 46.61
O-BF-2 0.00 811.18 712.00 99.18 42.98
J-1 0.00 835.86 705.00 130.86 56.70
J-3 0.00 834.65 707.00 127.65 55.31
J-4 0.00 832.36 711.00 121.36 52.59
J-5 0.00 831.30 712.00 119.30 51.70
J-6 0.00 833.41 715.00 118.41 51.31
J-7 0.00 835.83 715.00 120.83 52.36
J-8 4.80(1.60) 812.36 709.00 103.36 44.79
J-9 4.80(1.60) 812.37 708.00 104.37 45.23
J-10 4.80(1.60) 812.38 710.00 102.38 44.37
J-11 4.80(1.60) 812.36 710.00 102.36 44.35
J-12 4.80(1.60) 812.34 709.00 103.34 44.78
J-13 4.80(1.60) 812.35 711.00 101.35 43.92
J-14 4.80(1.60) 812.34 711.00 101.34 43.92
J-15 4.80(1.60) 812.34 709.00 103.34 44.78
J-16 4.80(1.60) 812.34 708.00 104.34 45.21
J-17 4.80(1.60) 812.34 708.00 104.34 45.21
J-18 4.80(1.60) 812.35 706.00 106.35 46.08
J-19 4.80(1.60) 812.34 706.00 106.34 46.08
J-121 0.00 811.89 708.00 103.89 45.02
J-122 0.00 807.70 710.00 97.70 42.34
J-123 0.00 811.89 710.00 101.89 44.15
J-125 1500.00 785.59 711.00 74.59 32.32
I-Meter 1 0.00 831.27 712.00 119.27 51.68
I-BF-1 0.00 833.96 707.00 126.96 55.02
I-BF-2 0.00 831.02 712.00 119.02 51.57
M A X I M U M A N D M I N I M U M V A L U E S
P R E S S U R E S
JUNCTION MAXIMUM JUNCTION MINIMUM
NUMBER PRESSURES NUMBER PRESSURES
psi psi
--------------------- ---------------------
J-1 56.70 J-125 32.32
J-3 55.31 J-122 42.34
I-BF-1 55.02 O-BF-2 42.98
3469
Esperanza PA 11 (Ontario East) Project April 17, 2025
City of Ontario Dexter Wilson Eng., Inc.
Computer Hydraulic Model Job 1551-001
Appendix C
V E L O C I T I E S
PIPE MAXIMUM PIPE MINIMUM
NUMBER VELOCITY NUMBER VELOCITY
(ft/s) (ft/s)
--------------------- ---------------------
P-131 9.57 P-17 0.01
P-25 5.09 P-19 0.10
P-26 5.09 P-15 0.12
S U M M A R Y O F I N F L O W S A N D O U T F L O W S
(+) INFLOWS INTO THE SYSTEM FROM SUPPLY NODES
(-) OUTFLOWS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO SUPPLY NODES
NODE FLOWRATE NODE
NAME gpm TITLE
--------------------------------------------
FF Test 1557.60
NET SYSTEM INFLOW = 1557.60
NET SYSTEM OUTFLOW = 0.00
NET SYSTEM DEMAND = 1557.60
================================================================================ Case: 4
C H A N G E S F O R N E X T S I M U L A T I O N (Change Number = 4 )
Peak Domestic Demand - WFU Based
JUNCTION DEMANDS CHANGED - PLEASE SEE RESULTS TABLE
TANK at node FF Test has a new HGL of 886.000
RESULTS OBTAINED AFTER 14 TRIALS: ACCURACY = 0.97120E-04
P I P E L I N E R E S U L T S
STATUS CODE: XX -CLOSED PIPE CV -CHECK VALVE
P I P E NODE NUMBERS FLOWRATE HEAD MINOR LINE HL+ML/ HL/ N A M E #1 #2 LOSS LOSS VELO. 1000 1000
gpm ft ft ft/s ft/f ft/f
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- P-1 J-1 J-7 282.34 0.01 0.00 0.20 0.01 0.01
P-2 J-1 FF Test -673.20 0.24 0.00 0.48 0.05 0.05
P-3 J-3 J-1 -390.86 0.18 0.00 1.11 0.52 0.52
P-4 J-4 J-3 -262.62 1.10 0.00 1.68 1.78 1.78
P-5 J-5 J-4 -262.62 0.52 0.00 1.68 1.78 1.78
P-6 J-6 J-5 282.34 0.84 0.00 1.80 2.04 2.04
P-7 J-7 J-6 282.34 0.96 0.00 1.80 2.04 2.04
P-8 J-3 I-BF-1 128.24 0.01 0.02 0.82 1.25 0.47
P-9 J-9 J-8 56.10 0.78 0.04 1.43 3.16 2.99
P-10 J-9 J-10 -323.14 1.27 0.29 3.67 13.05 10.62
P-11 J-5 I-Meter 1 673.20 0.83 2.26 7.64 154.56 41.33
P-12 J-10 J-11 293.96 2.14 0.30 3.34 10.17 8.91
P-13 J-11 J-13 237.86 0.54 0.08 2.70 6.96 6.02
3470
Esperanza PA 11 (Ontario East) Project April 17, 2025
City of Ontario Dexter Wilson Eng., Inc.
Computer Hydraulic Model Job 1551-001
Appendix C
P-14 J-13 J-14 181.76 0.44 0.05 2.06 4.07 3.66
P-15 J-14 J-12 125.66 0.30 0.04 1.43 2.07 1.85
P-16 J-12 J-15 56.10 0.57 0.04 1.43 3.22 2.99
P-17 J-12 J-16 13.46 0.01 0.00 0.15 0.03 0.03
P-18 J-16 J-17 56.10 0.51 0.03 1.43 3.17 2.99
P-19 J-16 J-18 -98.74 0.48 0.03 1.12 1.25 1.18
P-20 J-18 J-19 56.10 0.51 0.03 1.43 3.17 2.99
P-21 J-9 J-18 210.94 1.78 0.04 2.39 4.91 4.82
P-23 O-BF-1 J-121 128.24 0.09 0.02 0.82 0.55 0.47
P-24 O-Meter 1 J-10 673.20 8.27 1.36 7.64 48.12 41.33
P-25 J-5 I-BF-2 -128.24 0.01 0.00 0.82 0.47 0.47
P-26 O-BF-2 J-122 -128.24 0.12 0.00 0.82 0.47 0.47
P-127 J-122 J-121 -128.24 0.16 0.01 0.82 0.52 0.47
P-128 J-121 J-123 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
P-131 J-125 J-122 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
P U M P/L O S S E L E M E N T R E S U L T S
INLET OUTLET PUMP EFFIC- USEFUL INCREMTL TOTAL #PUMPS #PUMPS NPSH Case NAME FLOWRATE HEAD HEAD HEAD ENCY POWER COST COST PARALLEL SERIES Avail. gpm ft ft ft % Hp $ $ ft
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Meter 1 673.20 168.87 146.52 -22.3 75.00 -4. 0.0 -0.1 ** ** 201.2 4.0000 BF-1 128.24 178.55 161.81 -16.7 75.00 -1. -0.2 -0.5 ** ** 211.7 4.0000 Warning P2K107:Device BF-2 is operating out of range.
BF-2 -128.24 171.97 156.40 -15.6 75.00 1. -0.2 -0.3 ** ** 205.2 4.0000
N O D E R E S U L T S
NODE NODE EXTERNAL HYDRAULIC NODE PRESSURE NODE
NAME TITLE DEMAND GRADE ELEVATION HEAD PRESSURE
gpm ft ft ft psi
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FF Test ---- 886.00
O-Meter 1 0.00 858.52 712.00 146.52 63.49
O-BF-1 0.00 868.81 707.00 161.81 70.12
O-BF-2 0.00 868.40 712.00 156.40 67.78
J-1 0.00 885.76 705.00 180.76 78.33
J-3 0.00 885.58 707.00 178.58 77.38
J-4 0.00 884.47 711.00 173.47 75.17
J-5 0.00 883.96 712.00 171.96 74.51
J-6 0.00 884.79 715.00 169.79 73.58
J-7 0.00 885.75 715.00 170.75 73.99
J-8 56.10( ** ) 846.51 709.00 137.51 59.59
J-9 56.10( ** ) 847.33 708.00 139.33 60.38
J-10 56.10( ** ) 848.90 710.00 138.90 60.19
J-11 56.10( ** ) 846.46 710.00 136.46 59.13
J-12 56.10( ** ) 845.01 709.00 136.01 58.94
J-13 56.10( ** ) 845.83 711.00 134.83 58.43
J-14 56.10( ** ) 845.34 711.00 134.34 58.21
J-15 56.10( ** ) 844.40 709.00 135.40 58.67
J-16 56.10( ** ) 845.00 708.00 137.00 59.37
J-17 56.10( ** ) 844.46 708.00 136.46 59.13
J-18 56.10( ** ) 845.51 706.00 139.51 60.46
J-19 56.10( ** ) 844.97 706.00 138.97 60.22
J-121 0.00 868.70 708.00 160.70 69.64
J-122 0.00 868.52 710.00 158.52 68.69
J-123 0.00 868.70 710.00 158.70 68.77
J-125 0.00 868.52 711.00 157.52 68.26
I-Meter 1 0.00 880.87 712.00 168.87 73.18
I-BF-1 0.00 885.55 707.00 178.55 77.37
I-BF-2 0.00 883.97 712.00 171.97 74.52
3471
Esperanza PA 11 (Ontario East) Project April 17, 2025
City of Ontario Dexter Wilson Eng., Inc.
Computer Hydraulic Model Job 1551-001
Appendix C
M A X I M U M A N D M I N I M U M V A L U E S
P R E S S U R E S
JUNCTION MAXIMUM JUNCTION MINIMUM
NUMBER PRESSURES NUMBER PRESSURES
psi psi
--------------------- ---------------------
J-1 78.33 J-14 58.21
J-3 77.38 J-13 58.43
I-BF-1 77.37 J-15 58.67
V E L O C I T I E S
PIPE MAXIMUM PIPE MINIMUM
NUMBER VELOCITY NUMBER VELOCITY
(ft/s) (ft/s)
--------------------- ---------------------
P-11 7.64 P-17 0.15
P-24 7.64 P-1 0.20
P-10 3.67 P-2 0.48
S U M M A R Y O F I N F L O W S A N D O U T F L O W S
(+) INFLOWS INTO THE SYSTEM FROM SUPPLY NODES
(-) OUTFLOWS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO SUPPLY NODES
NODE FLOWRATE NODE
NAME gpm TITLE
--------------------------------------------
FF Test 673.20
NET SYSTEM INFLOW = 673.20
NET SYSTEM OUTFLOW = 0.00
NET SYSTEM DEMAND = 673.20
***** HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS COMPLETED *****
3472
3473
Date:
Model Operator: J. Yang
Reviewed By: E. Woosley
Approved By: E. Woosley
Remarks:
Request Number: FM-25-0041
Project Name (if applicable):
Project Number(if applicable):
Location: HAVEN AV BETWEEN MERRILL & EUCALYPTUS
Pressure Zone (Max Reservoir HGL): 925 PZ Land Use (GP, TOP): MDR Fire Hydrant Asset #: J121 8-inch
Fire Hydrant Model Node #: J121 J115
Hydrant elevation: 697 feet
Static Pressure: 82 psi 82 psi
Flow Test Residual Pressure: 61 psi 66 psi
Flow Test Observed Flow: 2,000 gpm 2,000 gpm
Expected Flow at 20 psi 3,819 gpm 4,565 gpm
Potential Peak High Water Pressure*: 99 psi Maximum Flow Pumped from Main**: 1,567 gpm For Information on using Fire Flow Results contact the Fire Prevention Bureau at 909-395-2029.
For Details on how the Fire Flow Results were prepared, contact:
3/24/2025
Project Information
Fire Hydrant #1 Flow Results Main Direct Connection Flow Results
CITY OF ONTARIO
ONTARIO MUNICIPAL UTILITIES COMPANY
UTILITIES ENGINEERING DIVISION
1425 S. Bon View Avenue, Ontario, CA 91761
Phone: (909) 395-2600 FAX: (909) 395-2608
RECORD OF FIRE FLOW TEST # FM-25-0041 HAVEN AV BETWEEN MERRILL & EUCALYPTUS The results are valid for a period of 12 months from the date of the test release unless extended in writing by the Ontario Fire Department.
These Fire Flow Results cannot be used to create Boundary Controls for use in Hydraulic Modeling. *Potential Peak High Water Pressure is based on Pressure Zone HGL and Hydrant Elevation.
Notes
[email protected]
Disclaimer
These results were modeled with a 8-inch main being installed and looped on "A" Street, "B" Street, "C" Street,"E" Street, "D" Street, "F" Dr., "G" Dr., and "H" Dr. from Eucalyptus Ave to Parkview St. If said improvements are not installed, these results are null and void.
Main Size
Allowable Design Criteria
Expected Potable Water System Performance
**Maximum allowable Flow to be safely pumped from the main by a Pump System.
The allowable design criteria shown above represents projected future maximum day water system conditions at the location of the test as determined by the City of Ontario's hydraulic water system computer model. This allowable design criteria does not constitute a guarantee by the City of the present or future conditions and availability, pursuant to City Resolution 85-85.
Actual water pressure will, in instances, exceed or fall below allowable design criteria due to seasonal and daily pressure variation within the City’s water system. The designer is encouraged to provide an allowance in the fire protection system design to maintain adequate protection during such variations in system pressure.
Main Model Node #:
In "G" Dr
Static Pressure:
Flow Test Residual Pressure:
Flow Test Observed Flow:
Expected System Flow at 20 psi
3474
3475
DEXTER WILSON ENGINEERING, INC.
WATER ● WASTEWATER ● RECYCLED WATER
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
2234 FARADAY AVENUE ● CARLSBAD, CA ● (760) 438-4422
SEWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS FOR THE
ESPERANZA PA 11 PROJECT IN
ONTARIO RANCH
IN THE CITY OF ONTARIO
April 17, 2025
3476
3477
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE NO.
Introduction ............................................................................................................................1 Purpose of Study .......................................................................................................................3 Study Area.................................................................................................................................3 Sewer System Design Criteria ..................................................................................................3 Sewer Generation Rates ................................................................................................5 Peaking Factors.........................................................................................................................5 Manning’s “n” ............................................................................................................................5 Depth and Velocity of Flow in Gravity Sewers.........................................................................6 Existing Sewer System..............................................................................................................6 Existing Sewer Flows.....................................................................................................6 Proposed Sewer Facilities .........................................................................................................7 Sewer System Analysis .............................................................................................................8 Sewer System Analysis Results ................................................................................................8 Conclusions and Recommendations..........................................................................................9
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A DESIGN CRITERIA
APPENDIX B ESPERANZA PA 11 REFERENCE AND RED LINED PERTINENT SECTIONS OF THE 2022 L.D. KING MASTER SEWER STUDY
APPENDIX C SEWER ANALYSIS RESULTS
3478
DEXTER WILSON ENGINEERING, INC. PAGE 2
LIST OF FIGURES
PAGE NO.
FIGURE 1 VICINITY MAP.......................................................................................2 FIGURE 2 EXISTING AND PROPOSED SEWER SYSTEM..................................4
LIST OF TABLES
PAGE NO.
TABLE 1 ESPERANZA PA 11 SEWER GENERATION RATES ..........................5 TABLE 2 ESPERANZA PA 11 PROJECTED SEWAGE FLOWS .........................7 TABLE 3 ESPERANZA PA 11 EXISTING DOWNSTREAM
SEWER IMPACTS..................................................................................9 3479
3480
3481
Marcos Padilla, P.E.
April 17, 2025
Sewer System Analysis for Esperanza PA 11 Project
DEXTER WILSON ENGINEERING, INC. PAGE 3
Purpose of Study
The purpose of this letter report is to analyze the existing public sewer system downstream of the Esperanza PA 11 project and determine if there are any sewer system deficiencies created by the proposed development of this property and land use change from school site to medium density residential. This report will address any offsite (public) sewer system deficiencies that are created as a result of the development of the residential project.
A previous Ontario Ranch East Master Plan Sewer Study was prepared by L.D. King, Inc. for the overall master plan area in 2022 for the overall developer. This study will utilize that 2022 master plan where appropriate and will serve as an amendment to that 2022 master plan. Red lines of pertinent sections of the L.D. King, Inc. study are included in Appendix B.
Study Area
In general, the study area for this sewer report is the sewer sub-basin comprising of the tributary area surrounding the Esperanza PA 11 project up to the Eastern Trunk Sewer in Archibald Avenue. This sub-basin system collects the wastewater flow from Esperanza PA 11 and adjacent development. The gravity sewer in adjacent Amherst Avenue is an 8-inch sewer line that conveys wastewater to the connection with the 15-inch diameter sewer line running westerly in Eucalyptus Avenue. The 15-inch diameter sewer line in Eucalyptus Avenue turns south at Mill Creek Avenue and increases to 21-inch diameter before increasing to 27-inch diameter at Bellegrave Avenue and Merrill Avenue.
These existing public sewer facilities can be seen on Figure 2 and Exhibit A.
Sewer System Design Criteria
The design criteria used for the evaluation of the offsite sewerage system impacts by Esperanza PA 11 project are based on City design criteria. The City’s Master Plan itself was referenced to confirm the pertinent design criteria as well. A copy of the pertinent sections in the City’s Master Plan where the design criteria is located is attached as Appendix A. 3482
3483
Marcos Padilla, P.E.
April 17, 2025
Sewer System Analysis for Esperanza PA 11 Project
DEXTER WILSON ENGINEERING, INC. PAGE 5
Sewer Generation Rates. The sewer generation rates for the project is presented as Table 1 below.
TABLE 1
ESPERANZA PA 11 SEWER GENERATION RATES
Land Use Generation Rate
Medium Density Residential 174 gpd/unit
Peaking Factors
The peaking factor utilized in this study is identified in City’s design criteria. To convert average dry weather flows to peak wet weather flows, the following equation was used:
Qpeak dry weather flow = 1.77 x Qavg
0.893, where Qpeak equals peak flow in MGD (million gallons per day) and Qavg equals average flow in MGD.
Qpeak wet weather flow = 1.34 x Qpeak dry weather flow
Manning’s “n”
The gravity sewer analyses are made using a computer spreadsheet calculation which uses the Manning Equation for all of its calculations. The Manning’s “n” used by the computer spreadsheet calculation is held as a constant for all depths in a circular conduit. The value of Manning’s “n” used for this study is 0.013 per the City criteria. 3484
Marcos Padilla, P.E.
April 17, 2025
Sewer System Analysis for Esperanza PA 11 Project
DEXTER WILSON ENGINEERING, INC. PAGE 6
Depth and Velocity of Flow in Gravity Sewers
Gravity sewer lines are designed to convey peak flow. For pipes up to 12 inches in diameter, flow depths are maintained at or below a d/D ratio of 0.50 under peak dry weather flows.
Pipes that are larger than 12-inches in diameter are designed for a maximum d/D ratio of
0.64 under peak dry weather flows. For either group, the depth of flow to d/D shall not exceed
0.82 with peak wet weather flows.
Gravity sewer lines are designed to maintain a minimum velocity of 2.0 feet per second at peak flow to prevent the deposition of solids.
Existing Sewer System
There are existing gravity sewer lines that are adjacent to the project site. The sewer line that will be utilized by the project is an 8-inch diameter gravity sewer line in Amherst Avenue on the western boundary of the project. This existing sewer line conveys flow southerly and westerly and ultimately connects to the existing Eastern Trunk Sewer line in Archibald Avenue. Appendix B provides reference information of the existing sewer lines utilized by the project.
Existing Sewer Flows. The sewer system analysis for Esperanza PA 11 project will need to consider sewage flows from existing development that is upstream and downstream of the project. Esperanza PA 11 project will be the most upstream development along this particular stretch of gravity sewer. Appendix B summarizes the projected sewage flows from existing downstream development.
3485
Marcos Padilla, P.E.
April 17, 2025
Sewer System Analysis for Esperanza PA 11 Project
DEXTER WILSON ENGINEERING, INC. PAGE 7
Proposed Sewer Facilities
The projected sewer flow from Esperanza PA 11 project is based on the 161 residential unit site plan. Table 2 provides the summary of projected sewage flows for the project.
TABLE 2
ESPERANZA PA 11 PROJECTED SEWAGE FLOWS
Description Quantity Unit Flow Factor Total Avg. Flow
Residential 161 units 174 gpd/unit 28,014
Per the City design criteria, the peak dry weather flow to average flow ratio is approximately
2.59 based on the formula presented earlier this study, resulting in an estimated peak dry weather flow of 72,691 gpd (50 gpm). The peak wet weather flow is calculated to be 97,406 gpd (68 gpm).
The project will construct an onsite gravity sewer collection system within the project’s overall street distribution. The onsite sewer system within Esperanza PA 11 project is proposed to consist of 8-inch diameter gravity sewer lines. The existing and proposed sewer facilities for Esperanza PA 11 project are presented on Figure 2 and Exhibit A. 3486
Marcos Padilla, P.E.
April 17, 2025
Sewer System Analysis for Esperanza PA 11 Project
DEXTER WILSON ENGINEERING, INC. PAGE 8
Sewer System Analysis
To analyze the impact of Esperanza PA 11 project on the existing sewer system, a hydraulic analysis was conducted. Appendix C provides the hydraulic analysis output and Exhibit A provides the corresponding Manhole Diagram. To perform this analysis, we obtained AsBuilt and design drawings information of the existing sewer system so that the pipe sizes and slopes could be inputted to the spreadsheet. A key component of the hydraulic analysis is to estimate existing flows within the sewer lines that will be utilized to serve the Esperanza PA 11 project. Appendix B provided the summary of existing flows from existing offsite upstream and downstream development.
The existing downstream 8-inch, 15-inch, 21-inch, 24-inch, and 27-inch gravity sewer lines were analyzed to the point where it connects to the Eastern Trunk Sewer in Archibald Avenue.
Sewer System Analysis Results
Appendix C presents the results of the hydraulic analysis for Esperanza PA 11 project. The results indicate that the existing system has adequate capacity to serve the project. With the additional sewer flow from Esperanza PA 11 residential project, all sections of downstream sewer lines will flow less than depth criteria during peak flow conditions.
The analysis results in Appendix C also indicate where changes due to the land use occur in the downstream sewer system. These changes are indicated via red lines and comments.
A summary of the impacts of the existing downstream gravity sewer to the proposed project is shown below in Table 3.
3487
Marcos Padilla, P.E.
April 17, 2025
Sewer System Analysis for Esperanza PA 11 Project
DEXTER WILSON ENGINEERING, INC. PAGE 9
TABLE 3
ESPERANZA PA 11 EXISTING DOWNSTREAM SEWER IMPACTS
Existing Downstream
Sewer Section
Maximum d/D Ratio Minimum Velocity, fps
PDWF PWWF PDWF PWWF
8-inch Diameter 0.14 0.28 1.7 1.9
15-inch Diameter 0.26 0.32 2.5 2.7
21-inch Diameter 0.35 0.41 4.3 4.7
24-inch Diameter 0.58 0.72 2.3 2.5
27-inch Diameter 0.59 0.73 2.3 2.5
Conclusions and Recommendations
The following conclusions have been made related to providing sewer service to Esperanza PA 11 project.
1. Esperanza PA 11 project can receive sewer service by connecting to an existing public 8-inch diameter gravity sewer line in Amherst Avenue and connecting to its proposed in-tract gravity sewer collection system. The project will construct an 8-inch diameter gravity sewer collection system onsite.
2. The development of the project is projected to result in an average sewage flow of 28,014 gpd.
3. Figure 2 provides the project layout including the location of existing and proposed sewer facilities.
4. A sewer system analysis was conducted (see Appendix C) and indicates that all existing and proposed sewer lines have adequate capacity to convey peak flows from existing development plus Esperanza PA 11 project while maintaining depth-todiameter ratios of less than City criteria. 3488
3489
APPENDIX A
DESIGN CRITERIA
3490
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CRITERIA
CITY OF ONTARIO 3-5 Sewer Master Plan Update
R:Rpts\\Ontario, City of\2016-2017_Sewer Master Plan
Table 3-2
Sewer Unit Flow Factors
Max
Density
(du/ac)1
Density
(people/
du)2 FAR gpd unit gpd/ac gpd/tsf gpd/du
Residential
Rural Residential (OMC) RR 2 3.997 - 52 gpd/person 420 - 208 Low Density Residential (OMC) LDR 4 3.997 - 52 gpd/person 840 - 208 Low Density Residential (OR) LDR 5 3.997 - 52 gpd/person 1,040 - 208 Low Medium Density Residential (OMC) LMDR 8.5 3.997 - 52 gpd/person 1,785 - 208 Low Medium Density Residential (OR) LMDR 11 3.997 - 52 gpd/person 2,300 - 208 Medium Density Residential (OMC) MDR 18 3.347 - 52 gpd/person 3,150 - 174 Medium Density Residential (OR) MDR 25 3.347 - 52 gpd/person 4,350 - 174 High Density Residential (OMC) HDR 35 3.347 - 52 gpd/person 6,125 - 174 High Density Residential (OR) HDR 40 3.347 - 52 gpd/person 6,960 - 174 Commercial
Business Park BP - - 0.40 53 gpd/job 1,610 90 -
General Commercial GC - - 0.30 132 gpd/job 1,610 120 -
Hospitality3 HOS - - 1.00 116 gpd/room - 100 -
Neighborhood Commercial NC - - 0.30 51 gpd/job 1,610 120 - Office Commercial OC - - 0.75 31 gpd/job 2,250 70 -
Industrial
Industrial IND - - 0.55 51 gpd/job 1,060 45 -
Mixed Use4
High Density Residential MU-HDR 35 2.000 - 52 gpd/person 4,200 - 104 Office MU-O - - - 31 gpd/job 2,250 70 -
Non-Office MU-NO - - - 91 gpd/job 1,610 120 -
Open Space
Open Space Non-Recreational OS-NR - - - - - - - -
Open Space Recreational OS-R - - - - - 200 - -
Public
Public Facility PF - - - - - 1,450 - -
Public Middle or High School PS - - - 8 gpd/student - - Public Elementary School PS - - - 8 gpd/student - - -
Definitions: ac = acre OMC = Original Model Colony
du = dwelling unit OR = Ontario Ranch
gpd = gallons per day tsf = thousand sqare feet
4Mixed Use demands should be based on the types of landuse that make up the specific area and the unit demand factors provided above. The City's Buildout Table (April 2015) provides detailed information on the landuses that make up each mixed use area. 1Max Density per the City's Buildout Table (April 2015) for Original Model Colony. Density for LDR, LMDR, MDR, and HDR in Ontario Ranch were increased per the City Planning Department recommendation (March 2016). 2Density per the City's Buildout Table (April 2015)
3 The sewage generation for a hotel is best estimated by the number of rooms.
Sewer Unit Flow Factors
Landuse
DRAFT
3491
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CRITERIA
CITY OF ONTARIO 3-6 Sewer Master Plan Update
R:Rpts\\Ontario, City of\2016-2017_Sewer Master Plan
3-3.1 Residential Sewer Unit Flow Factors
As shown on Figure 3-1, the flow monitoring sites were primarily chosen in the Original Model Colony (OMC) areas, which are generally built out. The residential developments in this area is predominately low density residential (LDR) and high density residential (HDR), which were used to develop the sewage generation estimates in gallons per day per person.
The sewer unit flow factor for LDR and HDR were calculated to be 52 and 51 gpd/person, respectively, when applying annual sewer return ratios to the potable water unit flow factors. This calculation shows that the sewage generation per person is very similar, regardless of the residential land use categorization. For planning purposes, the sewage unit flow factor of 52 gpd per person was applied to all residential land use types, as shown in Table 3-2.
The majority of the new development is composed of low density residential (LDR) and low-medium density residential (LMDR) land use types, each with an estimated population density of 3.997 persons per dwelling unit. The sewer unit flow factor for both LDR and LMDR is 208 gpd/DU, when applying the sewage generation factor of 52 gpd per person.
The City’s planning department estimates that the medium density residential (MDR) and high density residential (HDR) land use types have population densities of 3.347 persons per dwelling unit. With the sewage generation factor of 52 gpd per person, the unit flow factor for MDR and HDR are 174 gpd per dwelling unit. 3-3.2 Non-Residential Sewer Unit Flow Factors
Commercial Land Uses
The City’s water meter billing data accounts for commercial indoor use, outdoor irrigation water use, as well as recycled water use. Excluding irrigation and recycled water use for commercial customers (business park, general commercial, office commercial, neighborhood commercial, and hospitality), a sewer return ratio of 89% of the annual average water use was developed. This return ratio was applied to the developed water demand factors to establish the sewer unit flow factors for commercial uses.
Hospitality Land Uses
The City’s 2010 General Plan defines an area along Vineyard Avenue, south of the I-10 Freeway and north of the Ontario International Airport, as the hospitality area. It consists of numerous hotels and restaurants that provide service for patrons of the airport. A sewer return ratio of 89% of the annual average water use was applied to the hospitality land use to establish the sewer unit flow factors.
Industrial Land Uses
Industrial land use types include a wide variety of businesses and manufacturing processes that causes sewage generation to vary significantly from one customer to another. This is evident in the wide range water use for different businesses with these land use categorizations. For example, warehouses typically use a low amount of water and generate low amounts of sewage. On the other hand, some manufacturing businesses can use large of amounts of water and contribute large amounts of sewage to the City’s sewer system.
The average sewer return ratio was estimated to be 75% of the annual average water use. For planning purposes and when no other specific planning information is available, the sewage generation will be based on DRAFT
3492
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CRITERIA
CITY OF ONTARIO 3-7 Sewer Master Plan Update
R:Rpts\\Ontario, City of\2016-2017_Sewer Master Plan
the sewer unit flow factor of 1,060 gpd/ac. This factor was based on the number of future estimated jobs and the 51 gpd/job divided by the number of future industrial acres. It is considered quite conservative in comparison to the currently estimated factor of 244 gpd/ac per flow monitoring in a primarily industrial area. The reason the existing factor is so low is because many of the industrial areas consist of warehouse uses that don’t use a lot of water. In the future, these warehouses can be converted to manufacturing uses. Therefore, for planning purposes, the calculated unit flow factor of 1,060 gpd/ac is deemed appropriate.
It is recommended that the City evaluate future potential high water users on a case by case basis, as details regarding the proposed development or redevelopment area becomes available. The sewer hydraulic model should be utilized to make sure that the system is capable of handling the proposed sewage generation.
Public Facility and School Land Uses
Sewer return ratios of 85% and 80%, respectively were implemented for public facilities and schools. The sewer unit flow factor for public facilities is 1,450 gpd per acre. For schools, the sewer unit flow factor is 8 gpd per student.
3-4 Peaking Factors
3-4.1 Peak Dry Weather
The wastewater unit flow factors discussed in Section 3-3 are used to generate average dry weather flows (ADWF) entering the collection system. However, the adequacy of a sewage collection system is based upon its ability to convey the peak flows. At any individual point in the system, peak dry weather flow (PDWF) is estimated by converting the total average flow upstream of the point in question to peak dry weather flow by an empirical peak-to-average relationship.
The peaking formula commonly used in sewerage studies is of the following form:
PDWF = a x ADWF b where PDWF = Peak Dry Weather Flow
ADWF = Average Dry Weather Flow
a, b = Peaking Formula Coefficients
In order to develop the peaking formula and establish coefficient “a” and “b”, the maximum versus average flow measured was plotted for each flow monitoring site as shown in Figure 3-3.
Based on the best fit line through the data points shown in Figure 3-3, the following peaking relationship was selected for this study:
PDWF (mgd) = 1.77 x ADWF (mgd) 0.893
The coefficient “b” factor accounts for smaller tributary areas with smaller ADWF, which generally experience greater PDWF. The change in usage of one customer in a very small tributary area will have a greater effect on its corresponding PDWF than a change in usage of one customer is a very large tributary area.
Note that the units of the selected peaking formula are in million gallons per day (mgd). These peaks are generally observed between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m. during weekdays and somewhat later in the morning hours during weekends in the predominantly residential areas.
DRAFT
3493
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CRITERIA
CITY OF ONTARIO 3-8 Sewer Master Plan Update
R:Rpts\\Ontario, City of\2016-2017_Sewer Master Plan
Figure 3-3
Peaking Formula
3-4.2 Peak Wet Weather
The peak wet weather flow (PWWF) has two components: peak dry weather flow (PDWF) and rainfall dependent inflow/infiltration (I/I) as expressed by the following equation:
PWWF = PDWF + I/I
Inflow and infiltration is discussed further in Section 3-5.
The flow monitoring effort for this study did not cover a wet weather period. Until wet weather flow data can be collected, it is recommended that the peak wet weather flow be estimated as the following:
Peak Wet Weather Flow (PWWF) = 1.34 x Peak Dry Weather Flow (PDWF) Although the PWWF/PDWF factor of 1.34 may not cover all situations, it is not reasonable or feasible to design the sewer system to carry the flows that would result from the use of a larger ratio. Instead, it is recommended that the City concentrate on projects such as replacing manhole covers, installing plugs in manhole covers, and replacing or relining cracked pipes to reduce inflow and infiltration. 3-5 Inflow and Infiltration
Inflow is the surface water that typically gains entry to the sewer system through perforated or unsealed manhole covers during rainfall events. Infiltration is defined as water entering the collection system from the ground through defective pipes, pipe joint connections, or manhole walls. The sewer system design capacity (PDWF) = 1.77*(ADWF)0.893
0.00 1.00
2.00 3.00
4.00 5.00
6.00 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00
Flow Monitoring
Maximum Flow (mgd)
Flow Monitoring
Average Flow (mgd)
DRAFT
3494
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CRITERIA
CITY OF ONTARIO 3-9 Sewer Master Plan Update
R:Rpts\\Ontario, City of\2016-2017_Sewer Master Plan
must include allowances for these extraneous flow components, which inevitably become a part of the total flow. The amount of inflow and infiltration (I/I) that enters the system typically depends upon the availability, adequacy, and location of the storm water drainage facilities; age and condition of structures; materials and methods of construction; the location of the groundwater table; and the characteristics of the soil. In the absence of flow monitoring data, many regulating agencies utilize commonly accepted practices for estimating I/I. For example, I/I is often estimated based on the diameter and length of pipeline (100 to 400 gpd/ in. dia/ mile) or as a percentage of the peak flow or pipeline capacity.
AKM’s experience from other master planning studies and review of limited flow monitoring information available during severe rainfall events indicate that the peak wet weather flow can vary from 10 percent of average dry weather flows in steeper areas with adequate drainage facilities, to over 400 percent of average dry weather flows in flat areas that lack significant drainage facilities.
For this study, extraneous flow due to inflow and infiltration is included in the peak wet weather flow formula described above. If better data becomes available subsequently for specific areas, the analysis shall be updated based upon that information.
3-6 Sewer System Performance Evaluation Criteria
Sewer system performance evaluation criteria are established to ensure that the wastewater collection system can operate effectively under all flow conditions. Each pipe segment must be capable of carrying peak wet weather flows in the hydraulically stable zone of the pipe. Low flows must be conveyed at a velocity that will prevent solids from settling and blocking the system.
The design capacity of a gravity pipeline is the calculated capacity of the pipeline based on the Manning formula:
𝑄 ൌ 1.486 ∗ 𝐴 ∗ 𝑅
ଶ
ଷ
𝑆
ଵ
ଶ
𝑛
Sewer system capacity is established using a Manning’s friction factor of 0.013 for vitrified clay pipe.
The design and analysis of sewer pipes is typically based upon the depth to diameter ratio (d/D). In this study, existing pipes are considered capacity deficient if the d/D is above 0.64 at peak dry weather flows. This d/D ratio was arrived at by taking 75% of a pipe’s maximum stable flow capacity, which is at a d/D of 0.82. The area above a d/D of 0.82 is considered hydraulically unstable. The 25% pipe capacity above the d/D ratio of
0.64 is reserved for inflow and infiltration.
By setting the maximum allowable PWWF equal to the maximum capacity of the pipe (d/D ratio = 0.82) and setting the maximum allowable PDWF equal to 75% of the maximum pipe capacity (d/D ratio = 0.64), the PWWF/PDWF ratio is 1.34 (100% pipe capacity/75% pipe capacity) as stated in Section 3-4.2. where, Q = flow in cubic feet per second
R = hydraulic radius in feet = A / P
A = cross-sectional area of the pipe in square feet
P = wetted perimeter in feet
S = slope of pipe in feet of rise per foot of length
n = Manning’s friction factor
DRAFT
3495
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CRITERIA
CITY OF ONTARIO 3-10 Sewer Master Plan Update
R:Rpts\\Ontario, City of\2016-2017_Sewer Master Plan
The extra pipeline capacity also allows for the possibility that actual wastewater flows may be slightly higher than anticipated PDWF. Additionally, the area above the water surface helps to keep the sewage aerated, reducing the possibility of septic conditions and odors.
For new construction, the design and analysis of gravity sewer pipes shall be based on the following depth to diameter ratios:
Pipes 12-inches and smaller in diameter shall be designed to flow at a maximum d/D of 0.50 under peak dry weather flows
Pipes 15-inches and greater in diameter shall be designed to flow at a maximum d/D of 0.64 under peak dry weather flows
For either group, the depth of flow to diameter ratio shall not exceed 0.82 with peak wet weather flows Although this Sewer Master Plan study defined existing pipes as deficient when the d/D ratio exceeded 0.64 under peak dry weather flows, for all practical purposes the aforementioned design criteria must be adhered to.
For instance, if the sewer pipe is 12-inches and smaller and was designed to flow at a maximum PDWF d/D of
0.50 and is now constructed. The maximum PDWF d/D must be maintained at 0.50. Additional future development flow should not be allowed to contribute to this sewer pipe if the maximum PDWF d/D ratio is going to exceed 0.50.
At a minimum, all pipes shall be 8 inches or larger in diameter and the velocity of flow in the pipe shall be greater than 2 feet per second at average dry weather flow (ADWF). This velocity will prevent deposition of solids in the sewer and help to re-suspend any materials that may have already settled in the pipe. The minimum corresponding slopes for various pipe sizes are shown in Table 3-3.
It is important to note that the slopes listed in Table 3-3 assume the depth of flow in the pipe is 50 or 64 percent full depending on the size. If there is insufficient flow to create this condition, greater slopes than those shown may be required.
The peak flow velocity shall be less than 10 feet per second in vitrified clay pipe.
The City recognizes that minimum slopes and velocities are sometimes not achievable under certain circumstances. On a case by case basis, the City may approve sewer designs that do not meet these criteria. 3-7 Sewer Pump Station Performance Evaluation Criteria
It is desirable to develop a sewer collection system with as few pump stations as possible due to the associated cost and maintenance required. The City’s policy does not allow new pump stations. If a pump station is absolutely necessary, the following criteria shall be minimum standards.
Sewer Size
2 ft/s Velocity
Slope
8" 0.0057
10" 0.0042
12" 0.0033
15" 0.0019
18" 0.0014
21" 0.0011
24" 0.0008
27" 0.0008
30" 0.0007
33" 0.0006
36" & larger 0.0005
Table 3-3
Example Sewer Slopes
*Pipes 12" and smaller assume
depth of flow is 50 percent
*Pipes 15" and greater assume
depth of flow is 64 percent
DRAFT
3496
#*
#*
#*
#*
!(
!(
!(
!( !( !(
!( !( !(
!( !( !(
!( !( !(
!( !( !( !(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!( !(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!( !(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!( !( !(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
RIVERSIDE DR
FERN ST
EUCLID AVE
CAMPUS AVE
BON VIEW AVE
CUCAMONGA AVE
GROVE AVE
BAKER AVE
VINEYARD AVE
RIVERSIDE DR
MISSION BLVD
PHILADEL
HAMNER AVE
MAGNOLIA AVE
CYPRESS AVE
WALNUT ST
SULTANA AVE
WALKER AVE
SR-60
SR-60
Magnolia
PS
Haven PS (to be
transferred to IEUA
or eliminated)
WINEVILLE AVE
VINTAGE AVE
Riverside
County City of
Chino
CHINO AVE
SCHAEFER AVE
EDISON AVE
EUCALYPTUS AVE
MERRILL AVE
MILL CREEK AVE
HAVEN AVE
Montclair Interceptor
RP-1
RP-5
Kimball Interceptor
Eastern Trunk Sewer
ONTARIO RANCH RD
CARPENTER AVE
BELLEGRAVE AVE
ARCHIBALD AVE
EDISON AVE
CHINO AVE
Colony HS
PS
PARCO AVE
RP-1 Bypass
Edenglen PS
(temporary)
15"
Q=0.751
S=0.0121
Fontana Interceptor
18"
Q=1.206
S=0.0126
21"
Q=2.226
S=0.0091
21"
Q=2.551
S=0.0112
12"
Q=0.303
S=0.0112
15"
Q=0.561
S=0.0087
15"
Q=0.988
S=0.0095
18"
Q=1.306
S=0.0076
15"
Q=0.514
S=0.0095
15"
Q=0.784
S=0.0095
18"
Q=1.209
S=0.0061
18"
Q=1.479
S=0.0090
15"
Q=0.456
S=0.0087
15"
Q=0.820
S=0.0114
18"
Q=1.620
S=0.0072
21"
Q=2.002
S=0.0060
24"
Q=2.002
S=0.0021
30"
Q=3.480
S=0.0019
30"
Q=4.786
S=0.0036
30"
Q=7.337
S=0.0075
30"
Q=7.337
S=0.0075
15"
Q=0.065
S=0.0143
27"
Q=2.602
S=0.0031
30"
Q=2.680
S=0.0084
21"
18"
15"
Q=0.296
S=0.0091
18"
Q=0.495
S=0.0083
18"
Q=0.901
S=0.0033
21"
Q=1.083
S=0.0079
24"
Q=1.380
S=0.0035
24"
Q=1.451
S=0.0035
27"
Q=2.288
S=0.0020
24"
Q=2.050
S=0.0125
24"
Q=1.601
S=0.0073 21"
Q=1.500
S=0.0067
15"
Q=1.246
S=0.0077
15"
Q=0.526
S=0.0077
15"
Q=0.181
S=0.0028
15"
Q=0.022
S=0.0037
15"
Q=0.402
S=0.0044
21"
Q=1.862
S=0.0125
21"
Q=2.108
S=0.0073
12"
Q=0.253
S=0.0041
12"
Q=0.204
S=0.0074
15"
Q=0.175
S=0.0234
15"
Q=0.027
S=0.0022
15"
Q=0.358
S=0.0048
15"
Q=0.391
S=0.0073
15"
Q=0.263
S=0.0014
12"
Q=0.224
S=0.0051
15"
Q=0.077
S=0.0217
12"
Q=0.129
S=0.0033
8"
Q=0.090
S=0.0041
City of
Eastvale
A70
A60
A50
A40
A30 B10
B20
B30
B40
B50 C50 D50
C40 D40
C30 D30
C20 D20
C10 D10
A20
A10
CTS470
CTS390
CTS310
CTS230
CTS150
CTS60
AA18MH102
AA17MH102
Z19MH100
G10
M290
M340
EUD80
MC50
HO85
EUC60
EUB140
Y20MH102
H150
V22MH101
MC170
V21MH106
V21MH102
H200 MC220
CSA60
MC310
H290
H340
Q18MH105
R18MH138
R18MH136
E925 T19111
V19MH108A
V19MH102A
X19MH104
ME30 Y19MH100
EUA10
PROJECT NO: 1001397.00
DATE: July 2020 Figure 5-2
#*
#*
")
Legend
City Boundary
Not Served by City of Ontario
Magnolia PS Tributary Area
Archibald Trunk Sewer Tributary Area
BonView Trunk Sewer Tributary Area
Carpenter Trunk Sewer Tributary Area
Eucalyptus to Archibald Trunk Sewer Tributary Area
Euclid Trunk Sewer Tributary Area
Grove Trunk Sewer Tributary Area
Haven North to Archibald Trunk Sewer Tributary Area
Haven South Trunk Sewer Tributary Area
Kimball Extension Trunk Sewer Tributary Area
La Avenida to Archibald Trunk Sewer Tributary Area
Merrill to Archibald Trunk Sewer Tributary Area
Mill Creek Trunk Sewer Tributary Area
Walker Trunk Sewer Tributary Area
³
0 1,500 3,000 6,000
Feet
CITY OF ONTARIO
SEWER MASTER PLAN UPDATE
Proposed Ontario Ranch
Sewer System
Private Sewer Pump Station
City Sewer Pump Station
Regional Connections to IEUA Trunks Sewer
City Gravity Sewer
IEUA Kimball Interceptor
IEUA/City RP-1 Outfall
IEUA/City Eastern Trunk Sewer
Future Western Trunk Sewer
Future Ontario Ranch Sewer (Designed)
Future Ontario Ranch Sewer
Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA) Sewer
Private Gravity Sewer
City Forcemain
Private Forcemain
Sewer Pipe Size (inches)
Average Dry Weather Flow (mgd)
Slope of Pipe (ft/ft)
XX"
Q
S
DRAFT
3497
APPENDIX B
ESPERANZA PA 11 REFERENCE AND
RED LINED PERTINENT SECTIONS OF THE 2022 L.D. KING MASTER
SEWER STUDY
3498
Updated August 2022
Updated October 2022
Updated November 2022
ESPERANZA PA-11 SCHOOL SITE - RESIDENTIAL CONVERSION UPDATE - Applicable project file numbers (PGPA24-003, PSPA24-004, PMTT24-008 (TM-20730), PDEV24-017).
3499
5 •
•
•
•
- The Esperanza PA 11 School Siet has been converted to a 161 unit medium density residential site. 3500
MERRILL TRIBUTARY: Merrill Ave to Bellegrave Ave to Mill Creek Ave Including Southern Portion of Haven Ave and Subarea 29 properties where the 2022 Amended Subarea 29 Specific Plans was used.
Land Use and DU's per 2050 TOP With the Exception of SCE Prop where the Existing Use was used, Esperanza propertes where the SP was used
TRIBUTARY TO EUCALYPTUS AVENUE
Rich Haven PA 8B 20 500 25 MDR 174 87,000
Esperanza PA3 11.4 156 14 MDR 174 27,144 0.114144 114,144 ESP10MH Esperanza North Por. PA4 12.87 202 16 MDR 174 35,148 0.035148 35,148 ESP21MH Esperanza South Por. PA4 6.43 101 16 MDR 174 17,574 0.017574 17,574 ESP30MH Esperanza PA 11 1000 8 gpd/st 8,000 0.008000 8,000 EUD5L100 Esperanza PA 10 TM 100 208 20,800 0.020800 20,800 EUD3L10 Esperanza PA 9 82 11 LMDR 208 17,056 0.017056 17,056 MCL10
TRIBUTARY TO BELLEGRAVE AVENUE
Esperanza PA 5 157 11 LMDR 208 32,656
Esperanza PA 6 78 11 LMDR 208 16,224 0.048880 48,880 M10L10 Esperanza PA 7 76 11 LMDR 208 15,808
Esperanza PA 8 107 11 LMDR 208 22,256 0.038064 38,064 M300 Subarea 29
PA 33 47.6 644 13.5 LMDR 174 112,056 112,056 0.112056 M6L10
TRIBUTARY TO HAVEN AVENUE
Rich Haven 9A and Portion of 9b 62.5 MU 2690 gpd/ac 168,125 168,125 0.168125 H160 The Lakes 24A PA1 25 625 25 MDR 174 108,750 108,750 0.108750 H150 The Lakes 24A PA3 6 NC 1610 gpd/ac 9,660 9,660
14 630 45 HDR 174 gpd/acre 109,620 119,280
13 143 11 LMDR 208 29,744 149,024 0.149024 EUC5L10
Subarea 29 PA 31 16.1 172 11 LMDR 208 35,776 0.035776 35,776 H4L10 Subarea 29 PA 32 42.5 671 15.8 LMDR 174 116,754 152,530 0.152530 H3L10 School 19 1200 8 gpd/st 9,600 0.009600 9,600 H00
TRIBUTARY TO MERRILL
Subarea 29 Pa 28 and 29 44.4 222 5 LDR 208 46,176 46176 0.046176 M4L10
TRIBUTARY TO PARKVIEW STREET
Subarea 29 PA 15 3.15 PF 1450 gpd/acre 4,568
Subarea 29 PA 16 6.07 41 6.8 LMDR 208 8,528
Subarea 29 PA 17 8.38 56 6.7 LMDR 208 11,648
Subarea 29 PA 19 8.95 61 6.8 LMDR 208 12,688
Subarea 29 PA 20 13.29 67 5.0 LDR 208 13,936 51,368 0.051368 Y19MH161 Subarea 29 PA 4 17.81 88 4.9 LDR 208 18,304
Subarea 29 PA 5 13.67 68 5.0 LDR 208 14,144 32,448 0.032448 Y19MH158 Subarea 29 PA 9a 7 LMDR 208 1,456 0.001456 Y19MH127 1,456 Subarea 29 PA 11 6.23 OS-R 200 gpd/acre 1,246
Subarea 29 PA 14 7.64 OS-R 200 gpd/acre 1,528 0.002774 Y19MH151 2,774 Subarea 29 PA 18 11.19 PS-E 750 8 gpd/stu 6,000
Subarea 29 PA 21 11.48 48 4.2 LDR 208 9,984
Subarea 29 PA 22 21.34 79 3.7 LDR 208 16,432
Subarea 29 PA 23 14.41 82 5.7 LMDR 208 17,056
Subarea 29 PA 24 13.71 73 5.3 LMDR 208 15,184
Subarea 29 PA 25 18.45 102 5.5 LMDR 208 21,216
Subarea 29 PA 26 12.03 101 8.4 LMDR 208 21,008
Subarea 29 PA 30 21.8 180 11 LMDR 208 37,440 144,320 0.144320 Y20MH101 Subarea 29 PA 27 9.58 50 5.2 LMDR 208 10,400 10,400 0.010400 M3AL10
TRIBUTARY TO ARCHIBALD AVE NORTH OF MERRILL AVE
Subarea 29 PA 1 83.1 432 5.2 LMDR 208 89,856 89,856
Subarea 29 PA 2 12.1 COM 1610 gpd/ac 19,481 109,337
Subarea 29 PA 3 34.5 186 5.4 LMDR 208 38,688 148,025 0.148025
TRIBUTARY TO ARCHIBALD AVE SOUTH OF MERRILL AVE
Subarea 29 PA 6 13 67 5.2 LMDR 208 13,936 13,936
Subarea 29 PA 7 15.3 65 4.2 LDR 208 13,520 27,456
Subarea 29 PA 8 9.1 46 5.1 LMDR 208 9,568 37,024
Subarea 29 POR. PA 9 62 7 LMDR 208 12,896 49,920
Subarea 29 PA 10 6.6 57 8.7 LMDR 208 11,856 61,776
Subarea 29 PA 12 9.5 53 5.6 LMDR 208 11,024 72,800
Subarea 29 PA 13 7.8 75 9.6 LMDR 208 15,600 88,400 0.088400 10 161 16.1 MDR 174
28,014
0.028014
3501
0.0727, 0.0281, 1.73, 0.24, 0.16
0.4110, 0.1949, 2.56, 0.26, 0.32
0.4110, 0.1949, 2.56, 0.26, 0.33
0.4499, 0.2157, 2.59, 0.27, 0.34
0.4499, 0.2157, 4.61, 0.18, 0.23
0.4499, 0.2157, 4.59, 0.18, 0.23
2.0731, 1.1936, 4.63, 0.33, 0.58
2.0731, 1.1936, 4.35, 0.35, 0.61
2.0994, 1.2106, 7.06, 0.25, 0.43
Assuming this slope is a typo?
2.0994, 1.2106, 4.34, 0.35, 0.61
2.1304, 1.2306, 4.45, 0.35, 0.61
2.1613, 1.2506, 2.32, 0.47, 0.94
2.4355, 1.4296, 2.39, 0.50, 1.00
3502
2.2336, 1.2976, 2.34, 0.48, 0.95
2.2336, 1.2976, 2.34, 0.48, 0.95
2.2336, 1.2976, 2.34, 0.48, 0.95
2.4050, 1.4096, 2.38, 0.50, 0.99
2.4355, 1.4296, 2.39, 0.50, 1.00
2.4355, 1.4296, 2.39, 0.50, 1.00
2.4355, 1.4296, 4.77, 0.30, 0.60
3.3179, 2.0211, 2.74, 0.58, 1.15
3.3179, 2.0211, 2.74, 0.58, 1.15
3.3179, 2.0211, 2.74, 0.58, 1.15
3.3179, 2.0211, 2.74, 0.58, 1.15
3.3179, 2.0211, 2.74, 0.58, 1.15
3.4008, 2.0777, 2.76, 0.58, 1.17
3.4008, 2.0777, 2.84, 0.57, 1.14
3.4008, 2.0777, 2.76, 0.58, 1.17
3.4008, 2.0777, 2.76, 0.58, 1.17
3.4008, 2.0777, 2.76, 0.58, 1.17
3.4008, 2.0777, 6.41, 0.31, 0.62
3.6131, 2.2235, 2.34, 0.58, 1.31
3.6131, 2.2235, 2.34, 0.58, 1.31
3.6172, 2.2263, 2.34, 0.58, 1.31
3.6172, 2.2263, 2.34, 0.58, 1.31
3.6237, 2.2308, 2.34, 0.58, 1.31
3.6983, 2.2822, 2.35, 0.59, 1.33
3.6983, 2.2822, 2.35, 0.59, 1.33
3.7450, 2.3146, 2.35, 0.59, 1.34
3.7450, 2.3146, 3.33, 0.45, 1.02
3503
MERRILL TRIBUTARY
0.32MGD
EDENGLEN
ESPERANZA
SUBAREA 29
RICH HAVEN
BELLEGRAVE AVENUE
MILL CREEK AVENUE
HAVE
N AVENUE
MERRILL AVENUE
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
3504
4.24 Ontario Esperanza Specific Plan
Section 4. LAND USE
Exhibit 8
Land Use Plan
N
MEDIUM DENSITY RES.
3505
Section 4. LAND USE
Ontario Esperanza Specific Plan 4.25
Table 2
Land Use Summary
LAND USE UNITS GROSS
ACRES
UNITS/
GROSS
ACRES
NET
ACRES
UNITS/
NET
ACRES
Residential Uses
PA-1 (RD-7 / Row Townhomes) 258 DU 21.48 AC 12.01 DU/AC 18.62 AC 13.86 DU/AC PA-2 (RD-4 / SFD Cottages) 165 DU 24.68 AC 6.69 DU/AC 20.81 AC 7.93 DU/AC PA-3 (RD-8 / Motorcourt Townhomes) 238 DU 19.84 AC 12.00 DU/AC 17.38 AC 13.69 DU/AC PA-4 (RD-6 / 6 Pack Courtyard) 149 DU 23.81 AC 6.26 DU/AC 19.92 AC 7.48 DU/AC PA-5 (RD-5 / 4 Pack Courtyard) 157 DU 23.78 AC 6.60 DU/AC 17.64 AC 8.90 DU/AC PA-6 (RD-4 / SFD Cottages) 78 DU 13.64 AC 5.72 DU/AC 10.00 AC 7.80 DU/AC PA-7 (RD-1 / SFD 50’ wide lots) 76 DU 14.36 AC 5.29 DU/AC 12.56 AC 6.05 DU/AC PA-8 (RD-2 / SFD 55’ wide lots) 107 DU 23.72 AC 4.51 DU/AC 19.26 AC 5.56 DU/AC PA-9 (RD-1 / SFD 50’ x 80’) 82 DU 17.75 AC 4.62 DU/AC 13.27 AC 6.18 DU/AC PA-10 (RD-3 / SFD 2 Pack) 100 DU 19.92 AC 5.02 DU/AC 14.62 AC 6.84 DU/AC Park 6.92 AC
Residential Land Use Total 1,410 DU 209.90 AC 6.72 DU/AC 164.08 AC 8.59 DU/AC Parks 9.89 AC
Neighborhood Edge Buffers 6.62 AC
Roadways 28.25 AC
SCE Easements and Well Sites 4.14 AC
Community Facilities Use
PA-11 (School) 13.10 AC 10.02 AC
PROJECT TOTAL 1,410 DU 223.00 AC 223.00 AC
NOTES:
1) Gross residential acres do not include the 13.10 gross acres for a school site. 2) Net residential acres are gross acres less parks, neighbohood edge buffers, roadways, easements and net area for school site.
3 LAND USE
Residential Uses
319 29.35 10.87 28.97 11.01
113 22.84 4.95 17.36 6.51
156 11.40 13.68 11.10 14.05
303 27.41 11.05 19.30 15.70
157 23.78 6.60 17.64 8.90
78 13.64 5.72 10.00 7.80
76 14.36 5.29 12.56 6.05
107 23.72 4.51 19.26 5.56
82 17.75 4.62 13.27 6.18
100 19.92 5.02 14.62 6.84
5.75 1491 209.90 7.10 164.08 9.09
Parks 9.89 AC
Neighborhood Edge Buffers 6.62 AC
Roadways 28.25 AC
SCE Easements and Well Sites 4.14 AC
Community Facilities Use
PA-11 (School) 13.10 AC 10.02 AC
PROJECT TOTAL 1491 223.00 DU AC 223.00 AC
PA-1 (RD-7/ Row Townhomes,
RD-8/ Motorcourt Townhomes) DU
PA-2 (RD-4/ SFD Cottages,
RD-6/ 6-Pack Courtyard) DU
AC
AC
UNITS GROSS
ACRES
UNITS/ GROSS
ACRES
DU/AC
DU/AC
NET ACRES
AC
AC
UNITS/ NET
ACRES
DU/AC
DU/AC
DU/AC
PA-3 (RD-7 & RD-8/ Row
Townhomes) DU AC DU/AC AC DU/AC
PA-4 (RD-6/ 6-Pack Courtyard,
8-Pack Courtyard, Row Townhomes) DU AC DU/AC AC
DU/AC
PA-5 (RD-5/ 4-Pack Courtyard) DU AC DU/AC AC DU/AC
PA-6 (RD-4/ SFD Cottages) DU AC DU/AC AC
DU/AC
PA-7 (RD-1/ SFD 50' wide lots) DU AC DU/AC AC DU/AC
PA-8 (RD-2/ SFD 55' wide lots) DU AC DU/AC AC
DU/AC
PA-9 (RD-1/ SFD 50' x 80') DU AC DU/AC AC DU/AC
PA-10 (RD-3/ SFD 2-Pack) DU AC DU/AC AC
DU/AC
Park 1 AC
Residential land Use Total DU AC DU/AC AC
NOTES:
1. Gross residential acres do not include the 13.10 gross acres for a school site.
2. Net residential acres are gross acres less parks, neighborhood edge buers, roadways, easements and net area for school site.
* PA-2 includes 3.45 AC of Park 1
*
Med. Density. Res. 161 DU 16.1 DU/AC
1652
3506
APPENDIX C
SEWER ANALYSIS RESULTS
The following conditions were modeled for Esperanza PA 11 Project:
1. Existing Flows (Peak Dry Weather Flow)
2. Existing Flows (Peak Wet Weather Flow)
3. Existing Plus Project Flows (Peak Dry Weather Flow)
4. Existing Plus Project Flows (Peak Wet Weather Flow)
• Reference Exhibit A for Manhole Diagram
3507
SEWER STUDY SUMMARY
DATE: 1/24/2025 Esperanza PA 11 (Ontario Ranch East) Sewer Capacity Analysis - Existing Flow Only - Peak Dry Weather Flow JOB NUMBER: 1551-001
EUD5L10P EUD5L100 EUD50 8 105 0.0053 0.0237 0.0080 1.24 0.14 0.09 EUD50P EUD50 EDU40 15 282 0.0047 0.3731 0.1749 2.49 0.24 0.30 EUD40P EDU40 EUD30 15 400 0.0043 0.3731 0.1749 2.41 0.25 0.31 EUD40P EUD30 EUD20 15 275 0.0045 0.4124 0.1957 2.53 0.26 0.32 EUD20P EUD20 EUD10 15 293 0.0229 0.4124 0.1957 4.49 0.17 0.22 EUD10P EUD10 MC50 15 83 0.0226 0.4124 0.1957 4.47 0.17 0.22 MC50P MC50 MC40 21 362 0.0074 2.0420 1.1736 4.61 0.33 0.57 MC40P MC40 MC30 21 361 0.0062 2.0420 1.1736 4.33 0.34 0.60 MC30P MC30 MC20 21 253 0.0238 2.0684 1.1906 7.03 0.24 0.43 MC120P MC20 MC10 21 236 0.0061 2.0684 1.1906 4.32 0.35 0.61 MC100P MC10 M290 21 348 0.0065 2.0684 1.1906 4.42 0.34 0.60 M29 M290 M280 24 314 0.0011 2.0684 1.1906 2.29 0.46 0.91 M28 M280 M270 24 274 0.0011 2.2028 1.2776 2.33 0.47 0.95 M27 M270 M260 24 321 0.0011 2.2028 1.2776 2.33 0.47 0.95 M26 M260 M250 24 344 0.0011 2.2028 1.2776 2.33 0.47 0.95 M25 M250 M240 24 300 0.0011 2.3745 1.3896 2.38 0.49 0.99 M24 M240 M230 24 297 0.0011 2.3745 1.3896 2.38 0.49 0.99 M23 M230 M220 24 297 0.0011 2.3745 1.3896 2.38 0.49 0.99 M22 M220 M210 24 297 0.0011 2.3745 1.3896 2.38 0.49 0.99 M21 M210 G10 24 296 0.0073 2.3745 1.3896 4.74 0.30 0.59 M20 G10 M190 24 315 0.0013 3.2886 2.0011 2.74 0.57 1.14 M19 M190 M180 24 321 0.0013 3.2886 2.0011 2.74 0.57 1.14 M18 M180 M170 24 322 0.0013 3.2886 2.0011 2.74 0.57 1.14 M17 M170 M160 24 147 0.0013 3.2886 2.0011 2.74 0.57 1.14 M16 M160 M150 24 363 0.0013 3.2886 2.0011 2.74 0.57 1.14 M15 M150 M140 24 302 0.0013 3.3715 2.0577 2.75 0.58 1.16 M13 M140 Y20MH120 24 126 0.0014 3.3715 2.0577 2.83 0.57 1.14 Y20CL1017 Y20MH120 Y20MH121 24 321 0.0013 3.3715 2.0577 2.75 0.58 1.16 Y20CL1018 Y20MH121 Y20MH122 24 324 0.0013 3.3715 2.0577 2.75 0.58 1.16 Y20CL1019 Y20MH122 Y20MH100 24 280 0.0013 3.3715 2.0577 2.75 0.58 1.16 Y20CL1000 Y20MH100 Y20MH102 24 282 0.0128 3.3715 2.0577 6.39 0.31 0.61 Y20CL1003 Y20MH102 Y20MH103 27 194 0.0008 3.5840 2.2035 2.33 0.58 1.30 Y19CL1067 Y20MH103 Y19MH151 27 326 0.0008 3.5840 2.2035 2.33 0.58 1.30 Y19CL1066 Y19MH151 Y19MH152 27 330 0.0008 3.5881 2.2063 2.33 0.58 1.30 Y19CL1068 Y19MH152 Y19MH153 27 330 0.0008 3.5881 2.2063 2.33 0.58 1.30 Y19CL1070 Y19MH153 Y19MH154 27 216 0.0008 3.5946 2.2108 2.33 0.58 1.30 Y19CL1071 Y19MH154 Y19MH156 27 264 0.0008 3.6692 2.2622 2.34 0.59 1.32 Y19CL1069 Y19MH156 Y19MH157 27 296 0.0008 3.6692 2.2622 2.34 0.59 1.32 Y19CL1072 Y19MH157 Y19MH159 27 203 0.0008 3.7161 2.2946 2.35 0.59 1.33 Y19CL1075 Y19MH159 27 90 0.002 3.7161 2.2946 3.32 0.45 1.01 PDWF Water
Depth (ft)
General Pipe Information Ultimate Baseline Scenario
PDWF
(mgd)
ADWF
(mgd)
PDWF
Velocity
(ft/s)
PDWF
PIPE ID U/S MH ID D/S MH ID d/D
Archibald/
ETS
Diameter
(in)
Length
(ft) Slope
1 K' based on n = 0.013
2 dn/D using K' in Brater King Table 7-14
3 From Brater King Table 7-4 based on dn/D
\\MERIDIAN\Eng\1551001\Sewer Spreadsheets\2025-01-24 Sewer System Analysis - Esperanza PA 11 Ontario East (Existing Flows Peak Dry Weather Flow).xlsx 3508
SEWER STUDY SUMMARY
DATE: 1/24/2025 Esperanza PA 11 (Ontario Ranch East) Sewer Capacity Analysis - Existing Flow Only - Peak Wet Weather Flow JOB NUMBER: 1551-001
EUD5L10P EUD5L100 EUD50 8 105 0.0053 0.0318 0.0080 1.36 0.16 0.11 EUD50P EUD50 EDU40 15 282 0.0047 0.4999 0.1749 2.71 0.28 0.35 EUD40P EDU40 EUD30 15 400 0.0043 0.4999 0.1749 2.63 0.29 0.36 EUD40P EUD30 EUD20 15 275 0.0045 0.5527 0.1957 2.75 0.30 0.38 EUD20P EUD20 EUD10 15 293 0.0229 0.5527 0.1957 4.90 0.20 0.25 EUD10P EUD10 MC50 15 83 0.0226 0.5527 0.1957 4.88 0.20 0.25 MC50P MC50 MC40 21 362 0.0074 2.7363 1.1736 5.00 0.38 0.67 MC40P MC40 MC30 21 361 0.0062 2.7363 1.1736 4.69 0.40 0.70 MC30P MC30 MC20 21 253 0.0238 2.7716 1.1906 7.65 0.28 0.50 MC120P MC20 MC10 21 236 0.0061 2.7716 1.1906 4.68 0.41 0.71 MC100P MC10 M290 21 348 0.0065 2.7716 1.1906 4.79 0.40 0.70 M29 M290 M280 24 314 0.0011 2.7716 1.1906 2.46 0.54 1.08 M28 M280 M270 24 274 0.0011 2.9518 1.2776 2.50 0.56 1.13 M27 M270 M260 24 321 0.0011 2.9518 1.2776 2.50 0.56 1.13 M26 M260 M250 24 344 0.0011 2.9518 1.2776 2.50 0.56 1.13 M25 M250 M240 24 300 0.0011 3.1818 1.3896 2.55 0.59 1.18 M24 M240 M230 24 297 0.0011 3.1818 1.3896 2.55 0.59 1.18 M23 M230 M220 24 297 0.0011 3.1818 1.3896 2.55 0.59 1.18 M22 M220 M210 24 297 0.0011 3.1818 1.3896 2.55 0.59 1.18 M21 M210 G10 24 296 0.0073 3.1818 1.3896 5.14 0.34 0.69 M20 G10 M190 24 315 0.0013 4.4067 2.0011 2.91 0.70 1.40 M19 M190 M180 24 321 0.0013 4.4067 2.0011 2.91 0.70 1.40 M18 M180 M170 24 322 0.0013 4.4067 2.0011 2.91 0.70 1.40 M17 M170 M160 24 147 0.0013 4.4067 2.0011 2.91 0.70 1.40 M16 M160 M150 24 363 0.0013 4.4067 2.0011 2.91 0.70 1.40 M15 M150 M140 24 302 0.0013 4.5178 2.0577 2.92 0.71 1.43 M13 M140 Y20MH120 24 126 0.0014 4.5178 2.0577 3.01 0.69 1.39 Y20CL1017 Y20MH120 Y20MH121 24 321 0.0013 4.5178 2.0577 2.92 0.71 1.43 Y20CL1018 Y20MH121 Y20MH122 24 324 0.0013 4.5178 2.0577 2.92 0.71 1.43 Y20CL1019 Y20MH122 Y20MH100 24 280 0.0013 4.5178 2.0577 2.92 0.71 1.43 Y20CL1000 Y20MH100 Y20MH102 24 282 0.0128 4.5178 2.0577 6.94 0.36 0.71 Y20CL1003 Y20MH102 Y20MH103 27 194 0.0008 4.8026 2.2035 2.47 0.71 1.59 Y19CL1067 Y20MH103 Y19MH151 27 326 0.0008 4.8026 2.2035 2.47 0.71 1.59 Y19CL1066 Y19MH151 Y19MH152 27 330 0.0008 4.8081 2.2063 2.47 0.71 1.59 Y19CL1068 Y19MH152 Y19MH153 27 330 0.0008 4.8081 2.2063 2.47 0.71 1.59 Y19CL1070 Y19MH153 Y19MH154 27 216 0.0008 4.8168 2.2108 2.48 0.71 1.59 Y19CL1071 Y19MH154 Y19MH156 27 264 0.0008 4.9167 2.2622 2.48 0.72 1.62 Y19CL1069 Y19MH156 Y19MH157 27 296 0.0008 4.9167 2.2622 2.48 0.72 1.62 Y19CL1072 Y19MH157 Y19MH159 27 203 0.0008 4.9795 2.2946 2.49 0.73 1.64 Y19CL1075 Y19MH159 27 90 0.002 4.9795 2.2946 3.57 0.53 1.20 PWWF Water
Depth (ft)
General Pipe Information Ultimate Baseline Scenario
PWWF
(mgd)
ADWF
(mgd)
PWWF
Velocity
(ft/s)
PWWF
PIPE ID U/S MH ID D/S MH ID d/D
Archibald/
ETS
Diameter
(in)
Length
(ft) Slope
1 K' based on n = 0.013
2 dn/D using K' in Brater King Table 7-14
3 From Brater King Table 7-4 based on dn/D
\\MERIDIAN\Eng\1551001\Sewer Spreadsheets\2025-01-24 Sewer System Analysis - Esperanza PA 11 Ontario East (Existing Flows Peak Wet Weather Flow).xlsx 3509
SEWER STUDY SUMMARY
DATE: 1/24/2025 Esperanza PA 11 (Ontario Ranch East) Sewer Capacity Analysis - Existing plus Project Flows - Peak Dry Weather Flow JOB NUMBER: 1551-001
EUD5L10P EUD5L100 EUD50 8 105 0.0053 0.0727 0.0280 1.73 0.24 0.16 EUD50P EUD50 EDU40 15 282 0.0047 0.4110 0.1949 2.56 0.26 0.32 EUD40P EDU40 EUD30 15 400 0.0043 0.4110 0.1949 2.48 0.26 0.33 EUD40P EUD30 EUD20 15 275 0.0045 0.4499 0.2157 2.59 0.27 0.34 EUD20P EUD20 EUD10 15 293 0.0229 0.4499 0.2157 4.61 0.18 0.23 EUD10P EUD10 MC50 15 83 0.0226 0.4499 0.2157 4.59 0.18 0.23 MC50P MC50 MC40 21 362 0.0074 2.0731 1.1936 4.63 0.33 0.58 MC40P MC40 MC30 21 361 0.0062 2.0731 1.1936 4.35 0.35 0.61 MC30P MC30 MC20 21 253 0.0238 2.0994 1.2106 7.06 0.25 0.43 MC120P MC20 MC10 21 236 0.0061 2.0994 1.2106 4.34 0.35 0.61 MC100P MC10 M290 21 348 0.0065 2.1304 1.2306 4.45 0.35 0.61 M29 M290 M280 24 314 0.0011 2.1613 1.2506 2.32 0.47 0.94 M28 M280 M270 24 274 0.0011 2.2336 1.2976 2.34 0.48 0.95 M27 M270 M260 24 321 0.0011 2.2336 1.2976 2.34 0.48 0.95 M26 M260 M250 24 344 0.0011 2.2336 1.2976 2.34 0.48 0.95 M25 M250 M240 24 300 0.0011 2.4050 1.4096 2.38 0.50 0.99 M24 M240 M230 24 297 0.0011 2.4355 1.4296 2.39 0.50 1.00 M23 M230 M220 24 297 0.0011 2.4050 1.4096 2.38 0.50 0.99 M22 M220 M210 24 297 0.0011 2.4050 1.4096 2.38 0.50 0.99 M21 M210 G10 24 296 0.0073 2.4355 1.4296 4.77 0.30 0.60 M20 G10 M190 24 315 0.0013 3.3179 2.0211 2.74 0.58 1.15 M19 M190 M180 24 321 0.0013 3.3179 2.0211 2.74 0.58 1.15 M18 M180 M170 24 322 0.0013 3.3179 2.0211 2.74 0.58 1.15 M17 M170 M160 24 147 0.0013 3.3179 2.0211 2.74 0.58 1.15 M16 M160 M150 24 363 0.0013 3.3179 2.0211 2.74 0.58 1.15 M15 M150 M140 24 302 0.0013 3.4008 2.0777 2.76 0.58 1.17 M13 M140 Y20MH120 24 126 0.0014 3.4008 2.0777 2.84 0.57 1.14 Y20CL1017 Y20MH120 Y20MH121 24 321 0.0013 3.4008 2.0777 2.76 0.58 1.17 Y20CL1018 Y20MH121 Y20MH122 24 324 0.0013 3.4008 2.0777 2.76 0.58 1.17 Y20CL1019 Y20MH122 Y20MH100 24 280 0.0013 3.4008 2.0777 2.76 0.58 1.17 Y20CL1000 Y20MH100 Y20MH102 24 282 0.0128 3.4008 2.0777 6.41 0.31 0.62 Y20CL1003 Y20MH102 Y20MH103 27 194 0.0008 3.6131 2.2235 2.34 0.58 1.31 Y19CL1067 Y20MH103 Y19MH151 27 326 0.0008 3.6131 2.2235 2.34 0.58 1.31 Y19CL1066 Y19MH151 Y19MH152 27 330 0.0008 3.6172 2.2263 2.34 0.58 1.31 Y19CL1068 Y19MH152 Y19MH153 27 330 0.0008 3.6172 2.2263 2.34 0.58 1.31 Y19CL1070 Y19MH153 Y19MH154 27 216 0.0008 3.6237 2.2308 2.34 0.58 1.31 Y19CL1071 Y19MH154 Y19MH156 27 264 0.0008 3.6982 2.2822 2.35 0.59 1.33 Y19CL1069 Y19MH156 Y19MH157 27 296 0.0008 3.6982 2.2822 2.35 0.59 1.33 Y19CL1072 Y19MH157 Y19MH159 27 203 0.0008 3.7450 2.3146 2.35 0.59 1.34 Y19CL1075 Y19MH159 27 90 0.002 3.7450 2.3146 3.33 0.45 1.02 PDWF Water
Depth (ft)
General Pipe Information Ultimate Baseline Scenario
PDWF
(mgd)
ADWF
(mgd)
PDWF
Velocity
(ft/s)
PDWF
PIPE ID U/S MH ID D/S MH ID d/D
Archibald/
ETS
Diameter
(in)
Length
(ft) Slope
1 K' based on n = 0.013 2 dn/D using K' in Brater King Table 7-14 3 From Brater King Table 7-4 based on dn/D
\\MERIDIAN\Eng\1551001\Sewer Spreadsheets\2025-01-24 Sewer System Analysis - Esperanza PA 11 Ontario East (Existing plus Project Flows Peak Dry Weather Flow).xlsx 3510
SEWER STUDY SUMMARY
DATE: 1/24/2025 Esperanza PA 11 (Ontario Ranch East) Sewer Capacity Analysis - Existing plus Project Flows - Peak Wet Weather Flow JOB NUMBER: 1551-001
EUD5L10P EUD5L100 EUD50 8 105 0.0053 0.0974 0.0280 1.88 0.28 0.19 EUD50P EUD50 EDU40 15 282 0.0047 0.5507 0.1949 2.79 0.30 0.37 EUD40P EDU40 EUD30 15 400 0.0043 0.5507 0.1949 2.70 0.30 0.38 EUD40P EUD30 EUD20 15 275 0.0045 0.6029 0.2157 2.81 0.32 0.39 EUD20P EUD20 EUD10 15 293 0.0229 0.6029 0.2157 5.03 0.21 0.26 EUD10P EUD10 MC50 15 83 0.0226 0.6029 0.2157 5.00 0.21 0.26 MC50P MC50 MC40 21 362 0.0074 2.7779 1.1936 5.02 0.39 0.68 MC40P MC40 MC30 21 361 0.0062 2.7779 1.1936 4.71 0.40 0.71 MC30P MC30 MC20 21 253 0.0238 2.8132 1.2106 7.68 0.29 0.50 MC120P MC20 MC10 21 236 0.0061 2.8132 1.2106 4.70 0.41 0.72 MC100P MC10 M290 21 348 0.0065 2.8547 1.2306 4.83 0.41 0.71 M29 M290 M280 24 314 0.0011 2.8961 1.2506 2.49 0.56 1.11 M28 M280 M270 24 274 0.0011 2.9931 1.2976 2.51 0.57 1.14 M27 M270 M260 24 321 0.0011 2.9931 1.2976 2.51 0.57 1.14 M26 M260 M250 24 344 0.0011 2.9931 1.2976 2.51 0.57 1.14 M25 M250 M240 24 300 0.0011 3.2227 1.4096 2.55 0.60 1.19 M24 M240 M230 24 297 0.0011 3.2636 1.4296 2.56 0.60 1.20 M23 M230 M220 24 297 0.0011 3.2227 1.4096 2.55 0.60 1.19 M22 M220 M210 24 297 0.0011 3.2227 1.4096 2.55 0.60 1.19 M21 M210 G10 24 296 0.0073 3.2636 1.4296 5.18 0.35 0.70 M20 G10 M190 24 315 0.0013 4.4460 2.0211 2.91 0.70 1.41 M19 M190 M180 24 321 0.0013 4.4460 2.0211 2.91 0.70 1.41 M18 M180 M170 24 322 0.0013 4.4460 2.0211 2.91 0.70 1.41 M17 M170 M160 24 147 0.0013 4.4460 2.0211 2.91 0.70 1.41 M16 M160 M150 24 363 0.0013 4.4460 2.0211 2.91 0.70 1.41 M15 M150 M140 24 302 0.0013 4.5570 2.0777 2.92 0.72 1.44 M13 M140 Y20MH120 24 126 0.0014 4.5570 2.0777 3.02 0.70 1.39 Y20CL1017 Y20MH120 Y20MH121 24 321 0.0013 4.5570 2.0777 2.92 0.72 1.44 Y20CL1018 Y20MH121 Y20MH122 24 324 0.0013 4.5570 2.0777 2.92 0.72 1.44 Y20CL1019 Y20MH122 Y20MH100 24 280 0.0013 4.5570 2.0777 2.92 0.72 1.44 Y20CL1000 Y20MH100 Y20MH102 24 282 0.0128 4.5570 2.0777 6.96 0.36 0.72 Y20CL1003 Y20MH102 Y20MH103 27 194 0.0008 4.8416 2.2235 2.48 0.71 1.60 Y19CL1067 Y20MH103 Y19MH151 27 326 0.0008 4.8416 2.2235 2.48 0.71 1.60 Y19CL1066 Y19MH151 Y19MH152 27 330 0.0008 4.8470 2.2263 2.48 0.71 1.60 Y19CL1068 Y19MH152 Y19MH153 27 330 0.0008 4.8470 2.2263 2.48 0.71 1.60 Y19CL1070 Y19MH153 Y19MH154 27 216 0.0008 4.8557 2.2308 2.48 0.71 1.60 Y19CL1071 Y19MH154 Y19MH156 27 264 0.0008 4.9555 2.2822 2.49 0.72 1.63 Y19CL1069 Y19MH156 Y19MH157 27 296 0.0008 4.9555 2.2822 2.49 0.72 1.63 Y19CL1072 Y19MH157 Y19MH159 27 203 0.0008 5.0183 2.3146 2.49 0.73 1.65 Y19CL1075 Y19MH159 27 90 0.002 5.0183 2.3146 3.58 0.54 1.21 PWWF Water
Depth (ft)
General Pipe Information Ultimate Baseline Scenario
PWWF
(mgd)
ADWF
(mgd)
PWWF
Velocity
(ft/s)
PWWF
PIPE ID U/S MH ID D/S MH ID d/D
Archibald/
ETS
Diameter
(in)
Length
(ft) Slope
1 K' based on n = 0.013 2 dn/D using K' in Brater King Table 7-14 3 From Brater King Table 7-4 based on dn/D
\\MERIDIAN\Eng\1551001\Sewer Spreadsheets\2025-01-24 Sewer System Analysis - Esperanza PA 11 Ontario East (Existing plus Project Flows Peak Wet Weather Flow).xlsx 3511
3512
RESOLUTION NO. _______
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FILE NO. PGPA24-003, AN AMENDMENT TO
THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE POLICY PLAN (GENERAL PLAN), REVISING EXHIBIT LU-01 (OFFICIAL LAND USE PLAN) AND EXHIBIT LU-03 (FUTURE BUILDOUT), AFFECTING PROPERTY, LOCATED
SOUTH OF CHATHAM STREET, WEST OF CLIFTON AVENUE, EAST OF
AMHERST AVENUE, AND NORTH OF EUCALYPTUS AVENUE, FROM
PUBLIC SCHOOL TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 1073-101-050. (SEE
ATTACHMENTS 1 AND 2) (PART OF CYCLE 2 FOR THE 2025
CALENDAR YEAR).
WHEREAS, GDC Investments13, LP, has filed an Application for the approval of a General Plan Amendment, File No. PGPA24-003, as described in the title of this Resolution (hereinafter referred to as Application or Project); and WHEREAS, the City of Ontario adopted the Policy Plan (General Plan) as part of the component framework for The Ontario Plan on January 27, 2010, and issued Resolution No. 2010-004; and
WHEREAS, the City of Ontario adopted a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) for the General Plan Amendment for The Ontario Plan 2050 Technical Update (TOP 2050) on August 16, 2022 and issued Resolution No. 2022-129. Since the adoption of TOP 2050, the City has evaluated Exhibits LU-01: Official Land Use Plan and LU-03: Future Buildout further and is proposing modifications; and WHEREAS, the proposed changes to Exhibit LU-01 Official Land Use Plan include changes to land use designations of certain properties shown on Exhibit A to make the land use designations of these properties consistent with existing adjacent properties; and WHEREAS, Policy Plan Exhibit LU-03 (Future Buildout) specifies the expected buildout for the City of Ontario, incorporating the adopted land use designations. The proposed changes to Exhibit LU-01 (Official Land Use Plan) will require that Exhibit LU03 (Future Buildout) is modified to be consistent with Exhibit LU-01 (Official Land Use Plan), as depicted on Exhibit B, attached; and
WHEREAS, the Project proposes to amend TOP Policy Plan Land Use Map and associated buildout tables to change the land use designation of approximately 10.02 acres, located south of Chatham Street, west of Clifton Avenue, east of Amherst Avenue, and north of Eucalyptus Avenue, from Public School to Medium Density Residential (see Exhibit B), establishing a buildout capacity of 224 units; and WHEREAS, this capacity offsets the loss of 128 units resulting from File No. PGPA23-003 and ensures compliance with SB 330 by maintaining the City’s overall housing capacity; and
3513
WHEREAS, the Planning Director of the City of Ontario prepared and approved for attachment to the certified Environmental Impact Report, an Addendum to the Certified EIR (hereinafter referred to as "EIR Addendum") in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, together with State and local guidelines implementing said Act, all as amended to date (collectively referred to as "CEQA"); and WHEREAS, the Application is a project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act — Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. — (hereinafter referred to as "CEQA") and an EIR Addendum has been prepared to determine possible environmental impacts; and
WHEREAS, Ontario Development Code Table 2.02-1 (Review Matrix) grants the City Council the responsibility and authority to review and act on the subject Application; and WHEREAS, the Project is located within the Airport Influence Area of Ontario International Airport, which encompasses lands within parts of San Bernardino, Riverside, and Los Angeles Counties, and is subject to, and must be consistent with, the policies and criteria set forth in the Ontario International Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (hereinafter referred to as "ALUCP"), which applies only to jurisdictions within San Bernardino County, and addresses the noise, safety, airspace protection, and overflight impacts of current and future airport activity; and
WHEREAS, City of Ontario Development Code Division 2.03 (Public Hearings) prescribes the manner in which public notification shall be provided and hearing procedures to be followed, and all such notifications and procedures have been completed; and
WHEREAS, on September 23, 2025, the Planning Commission of the City of Ontario conducted a hearing to consider the SEIR Addendum and the Project, and concluded said hearing on that date, voting to issue Resolution No. PC25-047, recommending the City Council adopt the SEIR Addendum, and voting to issue Resolution No. PC25-048, recommending the City Council approve the Application; and WHEREAS, as the first action on the Project, on November 4, 2025, the City Council issued a Resolution adopting the SEIR Addendum, finding that the proposed Project introduces no new significant environmental impacts and applying all previously adopted mitigation measures to the Project, which were incorporated by reference; and WHEREAS, on November 4, 2025, the City Council of the City of Ontario conducted a hearing to consider the Project, and concluded said hearing on that date; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY FOUND, DETERMINED, AND RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Ontario, as follows:
3514
SECTION 1: Housing Element Compliance. Pursuant to the requirements of California Government Code Chapter 3, Article 10.6, commencing with Section 65580, as the decision-making body for the Project, the City Council finds that based upon the facts and information contained in the Application and supporting documentation, at the time of Project implementation, the project is consistent with the Housing Element of the Policy Plan (General Plan) component of The Ontario Plan, as the project site is not one of the properties in the Housing Element Sites Inventory contained in Tables B-1 and B-2 of the Housing Element Technical Report.
SECTION 2: Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan ("ALUCP") Compliance.
The California State Aeronautics Act (Public Utilities Code Section 21670 et seq.) requires that an Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan be prepared for all public use airports in the State; and requires that local land use plans and individual development proposals must be consistent with the policies set forth in the adopted Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan.
(1) On April 19, 2011, the City Council of the City of Ontario approved and adopted the Ontario International Airport Land use Compatibility Plan, establishing the Airport Influence Area for Ontario International Airport, which encompasses lands within parts of San Bernardino, Riverside, and Los Angeles Counties, and limits future land uses and development within the Airport Influence Area, as they relate to noise, safety, airspace protection, and overflight impacts of current and future airport activity. As the decision-making body for the Project, the City Council has reviewed and considered the facts and information contained in the Application and supporting documentation against the ONT ALUCP compatibility factors, including [1] Safety Criteria (ONT ALUCP Table 2- 2) and Safety Zones (ONT ALUCP Map 2-2), [2] Noise Criteria (ONT ALUCP Table 2-3) and Noise Impact Zones (ONT ALUCP Map 2-3), [3] Airspace protection Zones (ONT ALUCP Map 2-4), and [4] Overflight Notification Zones (ONT ALUCP Map 2-5). As a result, the City Council, therefore, finds and determines that the Project, when implemented in conjunction with the conditions of approval, will be consistent with the policies and criteria set forth within the ONT ALUCP; and SECTION 3: Concluding Facts and Reasons. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced hearing, and upon the specific findings set forth in Sections 1 and 2, above, the City Council hereby concludes as follows:
(1) The proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of TOP 2050 as follows:
Policy Plan (General Plan)
Land Use Element:
LU-1.1 Strategic Growth. We concentrate growth in strategic locations that help create place and identity, maximize available and planned infrastructure, foster the development of transit, and support the expansion of the active and multimodal transportation networks throughout the City.
3515
LU-1.6 Complete Community. We incorporate a variety of land uses and building types in our land use planning efforts that result in a complete community where residents at all stages of life, employers, workers, and visitors have a wide spectrum of choices of where they can live, work, shop and recreate within Ontario. Goal LU-2 Compatibility: Compatibility between a wide range of uses and a resultant urban patterns and forms.
Community Economics Element:
Goal CE-1 Complete Community: A complete community that provides for all incomes and stages of life.
Goal CE-2 Placemaking: A City of distinctive neighborhoods, districts, corridors, and centers where people choose to be; and
(2) The proposed General Plan Amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or general welfare of the City; and (3) The Land Use Element is a mandatory element allowed four general plan amendments per calendar year and this general plan amendment is the first amendment to the Land Use Element of the 2025 calendar year consistent with Government Code Section 65358; and
(4) The proposed General Plan Amendment action modifying land use designations for 10.2 acres from Public School to Medium-Density Residential, located south of Chatham Street, west of Clifton Avenue, east of Amherst Avenue, and north of Eucalyptus Avenue is consistent with the Housing Element of the Policy Plan (general plan) component of TOP 2050, as the Project site is not one of the properties in the Housing Element Sites contained in Tables B-1 and B-2 (Housing Element Sites Inventory) of the Housing Element Technical Report.; and (5) The proposed General Plan Amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or general welfare of the City; and (6) The Land Use Element is a mandatory element allowed four general plan amendments per calendar year and this general plan amendment is the first amendment to the Land Use Element of the 2025 calendar year consistent with Government Code Section 65358; and
(7) During the amendment of the general plan, opportunities for the involvement of citizens, California Native American Indian tribes (Government Code Section 65352.3.), public agencies, public utility companies, and civic, education, and other community groups, through public hearings or other means were implemented consistent with Government Code Section 65351.
3516
SECTION 4: City Council Action. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Sections 1 through 3, above, the City Council hereby APPROVES the herein described General Plan Amendment, attached hereto as "Attachment A," and incorporated herein by this reference.
SECTION 5: Indemnification. The Applicant shall agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless, the City of Ontario or its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City of Ontario or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul this approval. The City of Ontario shall promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding, and the City of Ontario shall cooperate fully in the defense.
SECTION 6: Custodian of Records. The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings have been based are located at the City of Ontario City Hall, 303 East "B" Street, Ontario, California 91764. The custodian for these records is the City Clerk of the City of Ontario.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 4
th day of November 2025.
_____________________________________
PAUL S. LEON, MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________________
SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
CITY ATTORNEY
3517
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
CITY OF ONTARIO )
I, SHEILA MAUTZ, City Clerk of the City of Ontario, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that foregoing Resolution No. 2025- was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Ontario at their regular meeting held November 4, 2025, by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
_________________________________
SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
The foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 2025- duly passed and adopted by the Ontario City Council at their regular meeting held November 4, 2025. _________________________________
SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
3518
ATTACHMENT 1:
Policy Plan Land Use Plan (Exhibit LU-01) Revision
(Document Follows This Page)
3519
Existing
3520
Proposed
3521
ATTACHMENT 2:
Future Buildout Table (Exhibit LU-03) Revision
(Document Follows This Page)
3522
3523
3524
3525
RESOLUTION NO. _______
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FILE NO. PSPA24-004, AN AMENDMENT TO
THE ESPERANZA SPECIFIC PLAN TO REVISE THE SPECIFIC PLAN
FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE ONTARIO PLAN POLICY PLAN
(GENERAL PLAN) LAND USE MAP. THE AMENDMENT INCLUDES [I] REVISING THE ALLOWED USES WITHIN PLANNING AREA 11 FROM
SCHOOL TO RD-7/ROW TOWNHOMES; AND [II] MODIFYING THE
SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS,
EXHIBITS, AND TEXT TO REFLECT THE PROPOSED LAND USE
CHANGES, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN:
1073-101-050.
WHEREAS, GDC Investments 13, LP (hereinafter referred to as Applicant) has filed an Application for the approval of a Specific Plan Amendment, File No. PSPA24-004, as described in the title of this Resolution (hereinafter referred to as Application or Project); and
WHEREAS, the Application applies to approximately 10.02 acres of land generally located south of Chatham Street, west of Clifton Avenue, east of Amherst Avenue, and north of Eucalyptus Avenue, within Planning Area 11 (RD-7 / Row Townhomes) of the Esperanza Specific Plan, identified as Assessor’s Parcel Number 1073-101-050, and presently vacant; and
WHEREAS, the property to the north of the Project site is within the Esperanza Specific Plan, designated Park, and developed with residential uses; the property to the east is within the Esperanza Specific Plan, designated PA-4 (RD-6 / 6-Pack Courtyard), and developed with residential uses; the property to the south is within the Esperanza Specific Plan, designated PA-7 (RD-1 / SFD 50’ wide lots), and developed with residential uses; and the property to the west is within the Esperanza Specific Plan, designated PA-10 (RD-3 / SFD 2-Pack), and developed with residential uses; and WHEREAS, on February 6, 2007, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2852, approving the Esperanza Specific Plan (File No. PSP05-002), establishing a master plan for the development of 223 acres of land, inclusive of the Project site; and WHEREAS, the Application was submitted to amend the land use designation and development standards of Planning Area 11 of the Esperanza Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, the Application was submitted to increase the number of units allowed within Planning Area 11 from 0 dwelling units to 161 dwelling units; and WHEREAS, The Ontario Plan (TOP) 2050 Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) (State Clearinghouse No. 2021070364), certified by the Ontario City Council on August 16, 2022, in conjunction with File No. PGPA20-002 (hereinafter referred to as Certified SEIR), in which development and use of the Project site was discussed; and
3526
WHEREAS, the Planning Director of the City of Ontario prepared and approved for attachment to the certified Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, an Addendum to the Certified EIR (hereinafter referred to as "EIR Addendum") in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, together with State and local guidelines implementing said Act, all as amended to date (collectively referred to as "CEQA"); and
WHEREAS, the environmental impacts of this project were thoroughly analyzed in the EIR Addendum, which concluded that implementation of the Project could result in a number of significant effects on the environment that were previously analyzed in the Certified EIR, and that the Certified EIR identified mitigation measures that would reduce each of those significant effects to a less-than-significant level; and WHEREAS, the City's "Local Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)" provide for the use of a single environmental assessment in situations where the impacts of subsequent projects are adequately analyzed; and
WHEREAS, the Application is a project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act — Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. — (hereinafter referred to as "CEQA") and an SEIR Addendum has been prepared to determine possible environmental impacts; and
WHEREAS, Ontario Development Code Table 2.02-1 (Review Matrix) grants the City Council the responsibility and authority to review and act on the subject Application; and WHEREAS, the Project has been reviewed for consistency with the Housing Element of the Policy Plan component of The Ontario Plan, as State Housing Element law (as prescribed in Government Code Sections 65580 through 65589.8) requires that development projects must be consistent with the Housing Element, if upon consideration of all its aspects, it is found to further the purposes, principals, goals, and policies of the Housing Element; and
WHEREAS, the Project is located within the Airport Influence Area of Ontario International Airport, which encompasses lands within parts of San Bernardino, Riverside, and Los Angeles Counties, and is subject to, and must be consistent with, the policies and criteria set forth in the Ontario International Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (hereinafter referred to as "ALUCP"), which applies only to jurisdictions within San Bernardino County, and addresses the noise, safety, airspace protection, and overflight impacts of current and future airport activity; and
WHEREAS, City of Ontario Development Code Division 2.03 (Public Hearings) prescribes the manner in which public notification shall be provided and hearing procedures to be followed, and all such notifications and procedures have been completed; and
3527
WHEREAS, on September 23, 2025, the Planning Commission of the City of Ontario conducted a hearing to consider the SEIR Addendum and the Project, and concluded said hearing on that date, voting to issue Resolution No. PC25-047, recommending the City Council adopt the SEIR Addendum, and voting to issue Resolution No. . PC25-049, recommending the City Council approve the Application; and WHEREAS, as the first action on the Project, on November 4, 2025, the City Council issued a Resolution adopting the SEIR Addendum, finding that the proposed Project introduces no new significant environmental impacts and applying all previously adopted mitigation measures to the Project, which were incorporated by reference; and WHEREAS, on November 4, 2025, the City Council of the City of Ontario conducted a hearing to consider the Project, and concluded said hearing on that date; and WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY FOUND, DETERMINED, AND RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Ontario, as follows:
SECTION 1: Housing Element Compliance. Pursuant to the requirements of California Government Code Chapter 3, Article 10.6, commencing with Section 65580, as the decision-making body for the Project, the City Council finds that based upon the facts and information contained in the Application and supporting documentation, at the time of Project implementation, the project is consistent with the Housing Element of the Policy Plan (General Plan) component of The Ontario Plan, as the project site is not one of the properties in the Housing Element Sites Inventory contained in Tables B-1 and B-2 of the Housing Element Technical Report.
SECTION 2: Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan ("ALUCP") Compliance.
The California State Aeronautics Act (Public Utilities Code Section 21670 et seq.) requires that an Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan be prepared for all public use airports in the State; and requires that local land use plans and individual development proposals must be consistent with the policies set forth in the adopted Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. (1) On April 19, 2011, the City Council of the City of Ontario approved and adopted the Ontario International Airport Land use Compatibility Plan, establishing the Airport Influence Area for Ontario International Airport, which encompasses lands within parts of San Bernardino, Riverside, and Los Angeles Counties, and limits future land uses and development within the Airport Influence Area, as they relate to noise, safety, airspace protection, and overflight impacts of current and future airport activity. As the decision-making body for the Project, the City Council has reviewed and considered the facts and information contained in the Application and supporting documentation against the ONT ALUCP compatibility factors, including [1] Safety Criteria (ONT ALUCP Table 2- 2) and Safety Zones (ONT ALUCP Map 2-2), [2] Noise Criteria (ONT ALUCP Table 2-3) and Noise Impact Zones (ONT ALUCP Map 2-3), [3] Airspace protection Zones (ONT ALUCP Map 2-4), and [4] Overflight Notification Zones (ONT ALUCP Map 2-5). As a result, the City Council, therefore, finds and determines that the Project, when implemented in conjunction with the conditions of approval, will be consistent with the policies and criteria set forth within the ONT ALUCP; and 3528
SECTION 3: Concluding Facts and Reasons. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced hearing, and upon the specific findings set forth in Sections 1 and 2, above, the City Council hereby concludes as follows:
(1) The proposed Specific Plan, or amendment thereto, is consistent with the goals, policies, plans and exhibits of the Vision, Policy Plan (General Plan), and City Council Priorities components of The Ontario Plan. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the Vision, Policy Plan (General Plan), and City Council Priorities components of TOP 2050, in that the Specific Plan Amendment contributes towards the legislative framework for the implementation of TOP components, guiding growth and development within the Project area to achieve optimum results from the City’s physical, economic, environmental, and human resources. (2) The proposed Specific Plan, or amendment thereto, would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or general welfare of the City. The development standards and guidelines established by the proposed Specific Plan Amendment have been created with the intent to safeguard and further the public interest, health, safety, convenience, and/or general welfare, and to ensure that the purposes of TOP 2050 and the proposed Specific Plan Amendment are maintained. (3) In the case of an application affecting specific property(ies), the proposed Specific Plan, or amendment thereto, will not adversely affect the harmonious relationship with adjacent properties and land uses. The location of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment, and the proposed conditions under which future developments will be constructed and maintained, is consistent with the Policy Plan component of TOP 2050 and the City’s Development Plan, and, therefore, will not adversely affect the harmonious relationship with adjacent properties and land uses. (4) In the case of an application affecting specific property(ies), the subject site is physically suitable, including, but not limited to, parcel size, shape, access, and availability of utilities, for the request and anticipated development.
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment has been reviewed by all City departments, which have established that the project site is physically suitable for the anticipated development in terms of parcel size, shape, and availability of utilities.
SECTION 4: City Council Action. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Sections 1 through 3, above, the City Council hereby APPROVES the herein described Application, subject to each and every condition set forth in the Department reports attached hereto as "Attachment A," and incorporated herein by this reference.
SECTION 5: Indemnification. The Applicant shall agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless, the City of Ontario or its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City of Ontario or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul this approval. The City of Ontario shall promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding, and the City of Ontario shall cooperate fully in the defense.
3529
SECTION 6: Custodian of Records. The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings have been based are located at the City of Ontario City Hall, 303 East "B" Street, Ontario, California 91764. The custodian for these records is the City Clerk of the City of Ontario.
The City Clerk of the City of Ontario shall certify as to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 4
th day of November 2025.
_____________________________________
PAUL S. LEON, MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________________
SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
CITY ATTORNEY
3530
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
CITY OF ONTARIO )
I, SHEILA MAUTZ, City Clerk of the City of Ontario, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that foregoing Resolution No. 2025- was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Ontario at their regular meeting held November 4, 2025, by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
_________________________________
SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
The foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 2025- duly passed and adopted by the Ontario City Council at their regular meeting held November 4, 2025. _________________________________
SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
3531
ATTACHMENT A:
File No. PSPA24-004
Esperanza Specific Plan Amendment
(Specific Plan Amendment document to follow this page)
3532
Department: Financial Services
Prepared By: Cruz Torres
Department:
Prepared By: Stephanie Castro
Staff Member Presenting: Armen Harkalyan,
Executive Director of Finance
Reviewed By: Claudia Hernandez, Matthew
Hernandez
Approved By:
Submitted To: Council/OHA
Approved: _______________________________
Continued To: ___________________________
Denied: __________________________________
Item No: 14
SUBJECT: A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A RESOLUTION REGARDING THE FORMATION OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 76 (COMPASS POINTE); ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION DEEMING IT NECESSARY TO INCUR BONDED INDEBTEDNESS; AND INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE LEVYING SPECIAL TAXES.
CITY OF ONTARIO
Agenda Report
November 4, 2025
SECTION:
PUBLIC HEARINGS
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider and:
A. Adopt a Resolution of Formation of Community Facilities District No. 76 (Compass Pointe), proposing that the community facilities district be authorized to levy a special tax and proposing that an appropriations limit of the community facilities district be established; B. Adopt a Resolution deeming it necessary for the district to incur bonded indebtedness within Community Facilities District No. 76 (Compass Pointe);
C. Adopt a Resolution calling a special election for City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 76 (Compass Pointe);
D. Adopt a Resolution declaring the results of the special election and directing the recording of a Notice of Special Tax Lien;
E. Introduce and waive further reading of an Ordinance levying special taxes within City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 76 (Compass Pointe); F. Adopt a Resolution authorizing the execution and delivery of an acquisition and funding agreement with KB Home Cal Management Services LLC; and G. Adopt a Resolution making a declaration of official intent to reimburse facilities expenditures with bond proceeds and related actions.
THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL GOALS ARE BEING ACHIEVED:
Operate in a Businesslike Manner
Focus Resources in Ontario's Commercial and Residential Neighborhoods Invest in the City's Infrastructure (Water, Streets, Sewers, Parks, Storm Drains and Public 3533
Facilities)
Ensure the Development of a Well Planned, Balanced, and Self-Sustaining Community in Ontario Ranch
FISCAL IMPACT: The use of Mello-Roos financing in the Compass Pointe residential development is projected to generate approximately $462,518 per year, at buildout, to fund administrative fees and municipal services; and approximately $14.9 million in bond proceeds to be used to fund a portion of the public infrastructure improvements needed to serve the project. Mello-Roos bonds are not a direct obligation of the City and are paid from special taxes levied on each taxable parcel in the district; therefore, there is no fiscal impact to the General Fund from the issuance of MelloRoos bonds. City Council approval will be required to process annual special tax levies in future years.
BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS: The Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 provides local government, with the consent from the qualified electors, the authority to establish community facilities districts for the purpose of levying special taxes to finance various kinds of public infrastructure facilities and municipal services. Under the Mello-Roos Act the initial steps in the formation of a community facilities district to finance public improvements and municipal services include, among other things, adopting resolutions declaring the intention to establish a community facilities district, authorize the levy of special taxes, and determining the necessity to issue bonds for the financing of public improvements. Accordingly, on September 16, 2025, the City Council approved Resolution No. 2025-138, a Resolution of Intention to establish City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 76 (Compass Pointe) and authorize the levy of special taxes; and Resolution No. 2025-139 declaring the necessity to issue bonds for the district. The Resolution of Intention set the public hearing date for the regularly scheduled City Council meeting on November 4, 2025, to consider formation matters. The City Council is now being asked to take the final steps in the formation process.
In the First Amended and Restated Agreement for the Financing and Construction of Limited Infrastructure Improvements to Serve an Easterly Portion of the New Model Colony ("First Amended and Restated Construction Agreement") between the City of Ontario and NMC Builders, LLC, the City agreed to cooperate with the members of NMC Builders, LLC, in the formation of community facilities districts to assist in the financing of the public improvements included in the agreement.
The Compass Pointe project is approximately 51.1 gross acres located south of Eucalyptus Avenue, north of Parkview Street, west of Haven Avenue, and east of Archibald Avenue. At build-out, the project is expected to include 350 residential units consisting of 67 single-family units and 283 attached units.
Included, as part of the Resolution of Formation is the proposed Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax for the District. Under the proposed Rate and Method of Apportionment, the portion of the maximum annual special tax rates which will be used to fund debt service payments on the bonds is fixed and will not increase over time. As proposed, the amount of bonds authorized for the district ($60 million) is set intentionally higher than the current estimated bond amount ($14.9 million) in order to allow future City Council the option, without increasing the amount of the annual special taxes, to issue additional bonds to replace and/or construct new public infrastructure improvements in the future, or to fund municipal services. The 3534
term and structure of the Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax for the Compass Pointe project is consistent with those of previously adopted Rates and Methods of Apportionment for Ontario Ranch community facilities districts. This ensures that the special tax rates levied on all residential property owners in community facilities districts in Ontario Ranch are developed in a consistent and equivalent manner. In addition, under the provisions of the Mello-Roos Act, to ensure that home buyers are making an informed decision, all residential builders in the Ontario Ranch districts are required to disclose the maximum annual special tax amount to each homeowner before entering into a sales contract.
Attached are six Resolutions and an Ordinance. The first attached Resolution establishes the community facilities district, with the rate and method of apportionment of special taxes and authorizes the levy of special taxes within the district. The second attached Resolution deeming it necessary to incur bonded indebtedness for the district. The third attached Resolution calls for a special landowner election to be held on November 4, 2025. The fourth attached Resolution declares the results of the election, including a statement from the City Clerk as to the canvass of ballots, and directs the recording of the Notice of Special Tax Lien. The fifth attached Resolution authorizes the execution and delivery of an acquisition and funding agreement. The sixth attached Resolution declares the intent to reimburse facilities expenditures with bond proceeds and related actions. Lastly, the attached Ordinance authorizes the levying of special taxes. 3535
RESOLUTION NO. ______
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO,
CALIFORNIA, OF FORMATION OF CITY OF ONTARIO COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 76 (COMPASS POINTE), PROPOSING THAT
THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT BE AUTHORIZED TO LEVY A
SPECIAL TAX AND PROPOSING THAT AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT OF THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT BE ESTABLISHED.
WHEREAS, on September 16, 2025, the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of Ontario (the “City”), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the “Act”), adopted a resolution entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Ontario, California, of Intention to Establish a Community Facilities District Proposed to be Named City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 76 (Compass Pointe) and to Authorize the Levy of a Special Tax Therein” (the “Resolution of Intention”), stating its intention to establish City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 76 (Compass Pointe) (the “Community Facilities District”), to authorize the Community Facilities District to levy a special tax within the Community Facilities District for the purpose of financing certain public facilities and services and setting the date for a public hearing to be held on the establishment of the Community Facilities District; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Resolution of Intention, notice of said public hearing was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the area of the Community Facilities District, in accordance with the Act; and WHEREAS, on this date, the City Council opened, conducted and closed said public hearing; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Resolution of Intention, each officer of the City who is or will be responsible for providing one or more of the proposed types of public facilities or services to be financed by the Community Facilities District was directed to study, or cause to be studied, the proposed Community Facilities District and, at or before said public hearing, file a report with the City Council containing a brief description of the public facilities and services by type that will in his or her opinion be required to adequately meet the needs of the Community Facilities District, and his or her estimate of the cost of providing such public facilities and services; such officers were also directed to estimate the fair and reasonable cost of the public facilities proposed to be purchased as completed public facilities and of the incidental expenses proposed to be paid; and WHEREAS, said report was so filed with the City Council and made a part of the record of said public hearing; and
WHEREAS, at the hearing, the testimony of all persons for or against the establishment of the Community Facilities District, the extent of the Community Facilities District and the furnishing of the specified types of public facilities and services was heard; and
3536
WHEREAS, written protests against the establishment of the Community Facilities District, the furnishing of any specified type or types of facilities and services within the Community Facilities District or the levying of a specified special tax were not made or filed at or before said hearing by 50% or more of the registered voters, or six registered voters, whichever is more, residing within the territory proposed to be included in the Community Facilities District, or the owners of one-half or more of the area of land in the territory proposed to be included in the Community Facilities District and not exempt from the special tax; and
WHEREAS, there has been filed with the City Clerk of the City a letter from the Registrar of Voters of the County of San Bernardino indicating that no persons were registered to vote within the territory of the proposed Community Facilities District as of October 23, 2025, which demonstrates that 12 or more persons have not been registered to vote within the territory of the proposed Community Facilities District for each of the 90 days preceding the close of said public hearing; and
WHEREAS, Section 53314.9 of the Act provides that, at any time either before or after the formation of a community facilities district, the legislative body may accept advances of funds from any source, including, but not limited to, private persons or private entities and may provide, by resolution, for the use of those funds for any authorized purpose, including, but not limited to, paying any cost incurred by the local agency in creating a community facilities district; and
WHEREAS, Section 53314.9 of the Act further provides that the legislative body may enter into an agreement, by resolution, with the person or entity advancing the funds, to repay all or a portion of the funds advanced, as determined by the legislative body, with or without interest, under all the following conditions: (a) the proposal to repay the funds is included in both the resolution of intention to establish a community facilities district adopted pursuant to Section 53321 of the Act and in the resolution of formation to establish a community facilities district pursuant to Section 53325.1 of the Act, (b) any proposed special tax is approved by the qualified electors of the community facilities district pursuant to the Act, and (c) any agreement shall specify that if the qualified electors of the community facilities district do not approve the proposed special tax, the local agency shall return any funds which have not been committed for any authorized purpose by the time of the election to the person or entity advancing the funds; and WHEREAS, the City and KB HOME Cal Management Services LLC (the “Landowner”), have entered into the Deposit and Reimbursement Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2025 (the “Deposit Agreement”), that provides for the advancement of funds by the Landowner to be used to pay costs incurred in creating the Community Facilities District and the incurrence of bonded indebtedness thereby, and provides for the repayment to the Landowner of such funds advanced, without interest, from the proceeds of any such bonded indebtedness incurred by the Community Facilities District; and WHEREAS, the City desires to include in this Resolution, in accordance with Section 53314.9 of the Act, the proposal to repay funds pursuant to the Deposit Agreement.
3537
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Ontario as follows:
SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct, and the City Council so finds and determines.
SECTION 2. The Community Facilities District is hereby established.
SECTION 3. The name for the Community Facilities District is “City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 76 (Compass Pointe).” SECTION 4. The public facilities (the “Facilities”) proposed to be financed by the Community Facilities District pursuant to the Act are described under the caption “Facilities” on Exhibit A hereto, which is by this reference incorporated herein. Those Facilities proposed to be purchased as completed public facilities are identified under the caption “Facilities to be Purchased” on Exhibit A hereto. The services (the “Services”) proposed to be financed by the Community Facilities District pursuant to the Act are described under the caption “Services” on Exhibit A hereto. The incidental expenses proposed to be incurred are identified under the caption “Incidental Expenses” on Exhibit A hereto. All or any portion of the Facilities may be financed through a financing plan, including, but not limited to, a lease, lease-purchase or installment-purchase arrangement.
SECTION 5. The proposed special tax to be levied within the Community Facilities District has not been precluded by majority protest pursuant to Section 53324 of the Act.
SECTION 6. The City Council proposes that, except where funds are otherwise available, the Community Facilities District be authorized to annually levy within the Community Facilities District a special tax (the “Special Tax”) sufficient to pay for all Facilities and Services, secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all nonexempt real property in the Community Facilities District. The rate, method of apportionment and manner of collection of the Special Tax in sufficient detail to allow each landowner or resident within the proposed Community Facilities District to estimate the maximum amount that he or she will have to pay, is specified in the Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax (the “Rate and Method”) attached hereto as Exhibit B, which is by this reference incorporated herein. The conditions under which the obligation to pay the Special Tax to be levied to pay for Facilities may be prepaid and permanently satisfied are specified in the Rate and Method. The Special Tax will be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes or in such other manner as the City Council shall determine, including direct billing of the affected property owners.
SECTION 7. The Special Tax may only finance the Services to the extent that they are in addition to those provided in the territory of the Community Facilities District before the date the Community Facilities District is created. The Services may not supplant services already available within that territory when the Community Facilities District is created. Bonds of the Community Facilities District may not be issued to fund any of the Services.
3538
SECTION 8. The tax year after which no further Special Tax to pay for Facilities shall be levied against any parcel used for private residential purposes is specified in the Rate and Method. Under no circumstances shall the Special Tax to pay for Facilities in any fiscal year against any parcel used for private residential purposes be increased as a consequence of delinquency or default by the owner or owners of any other parcel or parcels within the Community Facilities District by more than 10% above the amount that would have been levied in that fiscal year had there never been any such delinquencies or defaults. For purposes of this paragraph, a parcel shall be considered “used for private residential purposes” not later than the date on which an occupancy permit for private residential use is issued. The Special Tax to pay for Services will be levied in perpetuity, as provided in the Rate and Method.
SECTION 9. Pursuant to Section 53344.1 of the Act, the City Council hereby reserves to itself the right and authority to allow any interested owner of property within the Community Facilities District, subject to the provisions of said Section 53344.1 and to those conditions as it may impose, and any applicable prepayment penalties as prescribed in the bond indenture or comparable instrument or document, to tender to the Community Facilities District treasurer in full payment or part payment of any installment of the Special Tax or the interest or penalties thereon that may be due or delinquent, but for which a bill has been received, any bond or other obligation secured thereby, the bond or other obligation to be taken at par and credit to be given for the accrued interest shown thereby computed to the date of tender.
SECTION 10. The name, address and telephone number of the office, department or bureau that will be responsible for preparing annually a current roll of Special Tax levy obligations by assessor’s parcel number and that will be responsible for estimating further Special Tax levies pursuant to Section 53340.2 of the Act are as follows: City of Ontario, Financial Services Agency, 303 East B Street, Ontario, California 91764, (909) 395-2015 or email [email protected].
SECTION 11. Upon recordation of a notice of special tax lien pursuant to Section 3114.5 of the California Streets and Highways Code, a continuing lien to secure each levy of the Special Tax shall attach to all nonexempt real property in the Community Facilities District and this lien shall continue in force and effect until the Special Tax obligation is prepaid, permanently satisfied and canceled in accordance with law or until the Special Tax ceases to be levied and a notice of cessation of the Special Tax is recorded in accordance with Section 53330.5 of the Act.
SECTION 12. The boundary map of the Community Facilities District has been recorded in San Bernardino County in Book 92 at Page 61 of Maps of Assessments and Community Facilities Districts in the San Bernardino County Recorder’s Office (Document No. 2025-0225272).
SECTION 13. The City Council proposes that the annual appropriations limit, as defined by subdivision (h) of Section 8 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution, of the Community Facilities District be established at $60,000,000. 3539
SECTION 14. Pursuant to the provisions of the Act, the propositions to authorize the Community Facilities District to levy the Special Tax and to establish the appropriations limit of the Community Facilities District specified above shall be subject to the approval of the qualified electors of the Community Facilities District at a special election. The City Council hereby finds and determines that no persons were registered to vote within the territory of the proposed Community Facilities District as of October 23, 2025, and that 12 or more persons have not been registered to vote within the territory of the Community Facilities District for each of the 90 days preceding the close of the public hearing held by the City Council on the establishment of the Community Facilities District.
Accordingly, pursuant to Section 53326 of the Act, the vote shall be by the landowners of the Community Facilities District and each person who is the owner of land as of the close of said public hearing, or the authorized representative thereof, shall have one vote for each acre or portion of an acre that he or she owns within the Community Facilities District not exempt from the Special Tax. The voting procedure shall be by mailed or handdelivered ballot.
SECTION 15. The Landowner has heretofore advanced certain funds, and may advance additional funds, that have been or may be used to pay costs incurred in creating the Community Facilities District and the incurrence of bonded indebtedness thereby. The City Council has previously approved the acceptance of such funds for the purpose of paying costs incurred in creating the Community Facilities District and the incurrence of bonded indebtedness thereby. The City Council proposes to repay the Landowner all or a portion of such funds so advanced, without interest, solely from the proceeds of any such bonded indebtedness incurred by the Community Facilities District, pursuant to the Deposit Agreement. The Deposit Agreement is hereby incorporated herein as though set forth in full herein.
SECTION 16. The City Council hereby finds and determines that all proceedings, up to and including the adoption of this Resolution, were valid and in conformity with the requirements of the Act. In accordance with Section 53325.1 of the Act, such finding shall be final and conclusive.
SECTION 17. All actions heretofore taken by the officers, employees and agents of the City with respect to the establishment of the Community Facilities District, or in connection with or related to any of the matters referred to herein, are hereby approved, confirmed and ratified.
SECTION 18. The officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions and do all things that they, or any of them, may deem necessary or desirable to accomplish the purposes of this Resolution and not inconsistent with the provisions hereof.
SECTION 19. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
The City Clerk of the City of Ontario shall certify as to the adoption of this Resolution.
3540
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 4
th day of November, 2025.
PAUL S. LEON, MAYOR
ATTEST:
SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
CITY ATTORNEY
3541
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
CITY OF ONTARIO )
I, SHEILA MAUTZ, City Clerk of the City of Ontario, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that foregoing Resolution No. 2025- was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Ontario at their regular meeting held November 4, 2025 by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
____________________________________
SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
The foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 2025- duly passed and adopted by the Ontario City Council at their regular meeting held November 4, 2025. _____________________________________
SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
3542
A-1
EXHIBIT A
FACILITIES, SERVICES AND INCIDENTAL EXPENSES
Facilities
The types of public facilities to be financed by the Community Facilities District are street and bridge improvements, including grading, paving, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street signalization and signage, street lights and parkway and landscaping related thereto, domestic and recycled water distribution facilities, sewer collection facilities, solid waste facilities, storm drainage facilities, park and recreation facilities and equipment, aquatic facilities and equipment, fire facilities and equipment, police facilities and equipment, library facilities and equipment, fiber optic telecommunication, wireless communication and public safety camera facilities and equipment, general governmental office, administrative and meeting facilities, and land, rights-of-way and easements necessary for any of such facilities.
Facilities to be Purchased
The types of public facilities to be purchased as completed facilities are street and bridge improvements, including grading, paving, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street signalization and signage, street lights and parkway and landscaping related thereto, domestic and recycled water distribution facilities, sewer collection facilities, solid waste facilities, storm drainage facilities, and land, rights-of-way and easements necessary for any of such facilities.
Services
The types of City services to be financed by the Community Facilities District are police protection services, fire protection and suppression services, ambulance and paramedic services, maintenance and lighting of parks, parkways, streets, roads and open space, flood and storm protection services, maintenance and operation of fiber optic telecommunication, wireless communication and public safety camera systems and maintenance and operation of any real property or other tangible property with an estimated useful life of five or more years that is owned by the City.
Incidental Expenses
The incidental expenses proposed to be incurred include the following:
(a) the cost of planning and designing public facilities to be financed, including the cost of environmental evaluations of those facilities; (b) the costs associated with the creation of the Community Facilities District, issuance of bonds, determination of the amount of taxes, collection of taxes, payment of taxes, or costs otherwise incurred in order to carry out the authorized purposes of the Community Facilities District; and (c) any other expenses incidental to the construction, completion, and inspection of the authorized work.
3543
EXHIBIT B
RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX
3544
City of Ontario CFD No. 76 1 July 22, 2025
CITY OF ONTARIO
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 76
(COMPASS POINTE)
RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX
Special Taxes shall be levied on all Assessor’s Parcels in the City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 76 (Compass Pointe) (“CFD No. 76”) and collected each Fiscal Year, commencing in Fiscal Year 2026-27, in an amount determined by the City Council of the City of Ontario through the application of the Rate and Method of Apportionment, as described below.
All of the real property in CFD No. 76, unless exempted by law or by the provisions hereof, shall be taxed for the purposes, to the extent, and in the manner herein provided.
A. DEFINITIONS
The terms hereinafter set forth have the following meanings:
“Acre” or “Acreage” means the land area of an Assessor’s Parcel as shown on an Assessor’s Parcel Map, or if the land area is not shown on an Assessor’s Parcel Map, the land area shown on the applicable Final Subdivision Map, parcel map, condominium plan, or other recorded County map.
“Act” means the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, being Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the California Government Code. “Administrative Expenses” means the following actual or reasonably estimated costs directly related to the administration of CFD No. 76: the costs of computing the Special Taxes and preparing the annual Special Tax collection schedules (whether by the City or CFD No. 76 or both); the costs of collecting the Special Taxes (whether by the County or otherwise); the costs of remitting the Special Taxes to the Trustee; the costs of the Trustee (including its legal counsel) in the discharge of the duties required of it under the Indenture; the costs to the City or CFD No. 76 of complying with arbitrage rebate requirements; the costs to the City or CFD No. 76 of complying with City, CFD No. 76, or obligated persons disclosure requirements associated with applicable federal and state securities laws and of the Act; the costs associated with preparing Special Tax disclosure statements and responding to public inquiries regarding the Special Taxes; the costs of the City or CFD No. 76 related to the analysis and reduction, if any, of the Special Tax A on Single Family Property in accordance with Section C.1 herein; the costs of the City or CFD No. 76 related to an appeal of the Special Tax; the costs associated with the release of funds from any escrow account; the City’s administration fees and third party expenses; the costs of City staff time and reasonable overhead relating to CFD No. 76; and amounts estimated or advanced by the City or CFD No. 76 for any other administrative purposes of the CFD, including attorney’s fees and other costs related to commencing and pursuing to completion any foreclosure of delinquent Special Taxes. 3545
City of Ontario CFD No. 76 2 July 22, 2025
“Assessor’s Parcel” means a lot or parcel shown in an Assessor’s Parcel Map with an assigned Assessor’s Parcel Number.
“Assessor’s Parcel Map” means an official map of the Assessor of the County designating parcels by Assessor’s Parcel Number.
“Assessor’s Parcel Number” means, with respect to an Assessor’s Parcel, that number assigned to such Assessor’s Parcel by the County for purposes of identification. “Assigned Special Tax A” means the Special Tax A for each Land Use Class of Developed Property, as determined in accordance with Section C.1.a.2 below. “Backup Special Tax A” means the Special Tax A for each Land Use Class of Developed Property, as determined in accordance with Section C.1.a.3 below. “Bonds” means any bonds or other debt (as defined in Section 53317(d) of the Act) issued by CFD No. 76 under the Act and payable from Special Tax A. “Buildable Lot” means an individual lot, within a Final Subdivision Map or an area expected by CFD No. 76 to become Final Mapped Property, such as the area within a Tentative Tract Map, for which a building permit may be issued without further subdivision of such lot.
“CFD Administrator” means an official of the City responsible for determining the Special Tax A Requirement and Special Tax B Requirement, providing for the levy and collection of the Special Taxes, and performing the other duties provided for herein. “CFD No. 76” means City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 76 (Compass Pointe).
“City” means the City of Ontario, California.
“City Council” means the City Council of the City, acting as the legislative body of CFD No. 76.
“Contractual Impositions” means (a) a voluntary contractual assessment established and levied on an Assessor’s Parcel pursuant to Chapter 29 of Part 3 of Division 7 of the California Streets and Highways Code (commencing with Section 5898.10 et seq.), as amended from time to time, (b) a special tax established and levied on an Assessor’s Parcel pursuant to Section 53328.1 of the California Government Code and related provisions of the Act, as amended from time to time, and (c) any other fee, charge, tax, or assessment established and levied on an individual Assessor’s Parcel pursuant to a contractual agreement or other voluntary consent by the owner thereof (e.g., property owner association assessments).
“County” means the County of San Bernardino.
3546
City of Ontario CFD No. 76 3 July 22, 2025
“Designated Buildable Lot” means a Buildable Lot for which a building permit has not been issued by the City as of the date of calculation of the Backup Special Tax A. “Developed Property” means for each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property, exclusive of Final Mapped Property, Taxable Property Owner Association Property, and Taxable Public Property, for which a building permit or other applicable permit for new construction was issued after January 1, 2025, and before May 1 of the prior Fiscal Year. “Expected Residential Lot Count” means 154 Buildable Lots or Units of Single Family Attached Property and 196 Buildable Lots of Single Family Detached Property, or, as determined by the CFD Administrator, the number of Buildable Lots or Units of Single Family Property based on the most recent Tentative Tract Map(s) or most recently recorded Final Subdivision Map(s) or modified Final Subdivision Map(s). “Facilities” means the public facilities authorized to be financed, in whole or in part, by CFD No. 76.
“Final Mapped Property” means, for each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property, exclusive of Developed Property, Taxable Property Owner Association Property, and Taxable Public Property, which as of January 1 of the previous Fiscal Year was located within a Final Subdivision Map. The term Final Mapped Property shall include any parcel map or Final Subdivision Map, or portion thereof, that creates individual lots for which a building permit may be issued, including Parcels that are designated as a remainder Parcel (i.e., one where the size, location, etc., precludes any further subdivision or taxable use).
“Final Subdivision Map” means a final tract map, parcel map, or lot line adjustment approved by the City pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act (California Government Code Section 66410 et seq.) or a condominium plan recorded pursuant to California Civil Code Section 4285 that, in either case, creates individual lots for which building permits may be issued without further subdivision.
“Fiscal Year” means the period starting July 1 and ending on the following June 30. “Gated Community Attached Dwelling Unit” means, with respect to Special Tax B, a Unit within any residential building containing two or more dwelling units (including attached condominiums, townhouses, duplexes, triplexes, and apartments) within a gated community that, within such community, is primarily served by private interior streets. “Indenture” means the indenture, fiscal agent agreement, resolution, or other instrument pursuant to which Bonds are issued, as modified, amended, and/or supplemented from time to time.
“Land Use Class” means any of the classes listed in Tables 1 and 2 below. “Lower Income Household Welfare Exemption Property” means, for each Fiscal Year, an Assessor’s Parcel within the boundaries of CFD No. 76 that is subject to a welfare exemption under subdivision (g) of Section 214 of the California Revenue and 3547
City of Ontario CFD No. 76 4 July 22, 2025
Taxation Code (or any successor statute), as indicated in the most recent County assessor’s roll finalized prior to such Fiscal Year.
“Maximum Special Tax A” means, with respect to an Assessor’s Parcel of Taxable Property, the Maximum Special Tax A determined in accordance with Section C.1 below that can be levied in any Fiscal Year on such Assessor’s Parcel of Taxable Property. “Maximum Special Tax B” means, with respect to an Assessor’s Parcel of Taxable Property, the Maximum Special Tax B determined in accordance with Section C.2 below that can be levied in any Fiscal Year on such Assessor’s Parcel of Taxable Property. “Minimum Sale Price” means the minimum price at which Units of a given Land Use Class have sold or are expected to be sold in a normal marketing environment and shall not include prices for such Units that are sold at a discount to expected sales prices for the purpose of stimulating the initial sales activity with respect to such Land Use Class. “Multiple Family Dwelling Unit” means, with respect to Special Tax B, a Unit within any residential building containing two or more dwelling units, including attached condominiums, townhomes, duplexes, triplexes, and apartments, but excluding Gated Community Attached Dwelling Units.
“Non-Residential Property” means all Assessor’s Parcels of Developed Property for which a building permit was issued by the City permitting the construction of one or more non-residential structures or facilities.
“Other Residential Property” means, with respect to Special Tax A, all Assessor’s Parcels of Developed Property for which a building permit was issued by the City for purposes of constructing Units, excluding Single Family Attached Property and Single Family Detached Property.
“Outstanding Bonds” means all Bonds which are outstanding under and in accordance with the provisions of the Indenture.
“Price Point Consultant” means any consultant or firm of such consultants selected by CFD No. 76 that (a) has substantial experience in performing price point studies for residential units within community facilities districts established under the Act or otherwise estimating or confirming pricing for residential units in such community facilities districts, (b) has recognized expertise in analyzing economic and real estate data that relates to the pricing of residential units in such community facilities districts, (c) is in fact independent and not under the control of CFD No. 76 or the City, (d) does not have any substantial interest, direct or indirect, with or in (i) CFD No. 76, (ii) the City, (iii) any owner of real property in CFD No. 76, or (iv) any real property in CFD No. 76, and (e) is not connected with CFD No. 76 or the City as an officer or employee thereof, but who may be regularly retained to make reports to CFD No. 76 or the City. “Price Point Study” means a price point study or a letter updating a previous price point study prepared by the Price Point Consultant pursuant to Section C herein. 3548
City of Ontario CFD No. 76 5 July 22, 2025
“Property Owner Association Property” means, for each Fiscal Year, any property within the boundaries of CFD No. 76 that was owned by a property owner association, including any master or sub-association, as of January 1 of the prior Fiscal Year. “Proportionately” means (a) for Developed Property in the first step of Section D.1 below, that the ratio of the actual Special Tax A levy to the Maximum Special Tax A is equal for all Assessor’s Parcels of Developed Property; however, for Developed Property in the fourth step of Section D.1 below, Proportionately means that the amount of the increase above the Assigned Special Tax A, if necessary, is equal for all Assessor’s Parcels of Developed Property, except that if the Backup Special Tax A limits the increase on any Assessor’s Parcel(s), then the amount of the increase shall be equal for the remaining Assessor’s Parcels; (b) with respect to Special Tax B, that the ratio of the actual Special Tax B levy to the Maximum Special Tax B is equal for all Assessor’s Parcels of Developed Property; (c) for Final Mapped Property, that the ratio of the actual Special Tax A levy to the Maximum Special Tax A is equal for all Assessor’s Parcels of Final Mapped Property; (d) for Undeveloped Property, that the ratio of the actual Special Tax A levy to the Maximum Special Tax A is equal for all Assessor's Parcels of Undeveloped Property; (e) for Taxable Property Owner Association Property, that the ratio of the actual Special Tax A levy to the Maximum Special Tax A is equal for all Assessor’s Parcels of Taxable Property Owner Association Property; and (f) for Taxable Public Property, that the ratio of the actual Special Tax A levy to the Maximum Special Tax A is equal for all Assessor’s Parcels of Taxable Public Property. “Public Property” means, for each Fiscal Year, property within the boundaries of CFD No. 76 that is (a) owned by, irrevocably offered to, or dedicated to the federal government, the State, the County, the City, or any local government or other public agency or (b) encumbered by an easement for purposes of public or utility right-of-way that makes impractical its use for any purpose other than that set forth in such easement; provided that any property leased by a public agency to a private entity and subject to taxation under Section 53340.1 of the Act shall be taxed and classified according to its use.
“Rate and Method of Apportionment” means this Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax.
“Residential Floor Area” means all of the Square Footage of living area within the perimeter of a Unit, not including any carport, walkway, garage, overhang, patio, enclosed patio, or similar area. The determination of Residential Floor Area shall be as set forth in the building permit(s) issued for such Assessor’s Parcel, or as set forth in other official records maintained by the City’s Building Department or other appropriate means selected by CFD No. 76. The actual Square Footage shall be rounded up to the next whole square foot. Once such determination has been made for an Assessor’s Parcel, it shall remain fixed in all future Fiscal Years unless an appeal pursuant to Section F below is approved that results in a change in the actual Square Footage. “Residential Property” means, for each Fiscal Year, an Assessor’s Parcel for which a building permit for new construction of one or more Units was issued after January 1, 2025, and before May 1 of the prior Fiscal Year.
3549
City of Ontario CFD No. 76 6 July 22, 2025
“Services” means the services authorized to be financed, in whole or in part, by CFD No.
76. “Single Family Attached Property” means all Assessor’s Parcels of Developed Property for which a building permit or use permit was issued for construction of a residential structure consisting of two or more Units that share common walls, have separate Assessor’s Parcel Numbers assigned to them (except for a duplex unit, which may share an Assessor’s Parcel with another duplex unit), and may be purchased by individual homebuyers (which shall still be the case even if the Units are purchased and subsequently offered for rent by the owner of the Unit), including such residential structures within a condominium project as defined in Civil Code Section 4125. “Single Family Detached Dwelling Unit” means, with respect to Special Tax B, a Unit of Single Family Detached Property.
“Single Family Detached Property” means all Assessor’s Parcels of Developed Property for which a building permit was issued for construction of a Unit, on one legal lot, that does not share a common wall with another Unit. “Single Family Property” means all Assessor’s Parcels of Single Family Attached Property and Single Family Detached Property.
“Special Taxes” means, collectively, Special Tax A and Special Tax B. “Special Tax A” means the special tax authorized by the qualified electors of CFD No. 76 to be levied within the boundaries of CFD No. 76 to pay for Facilities and Services. “Special Tax A Requirement” means for any Fiscal Year that amount required, after taking into account available amounts held in the funds and accounts established under the Indenture, for CFD No. 76 to: (i) pay debt service on all Outstanding Bonds which is due in the calendar year that commences in such Fiscal Year; (ii) pay periodic costs on the Bonds, including, but not limited to, credit enhancement and rebate payments on the Bonds; (iii) pay a pro rata share of Administrative Expenses; (iv) provide any amounts required to establish or replenish any reserve fund for the Bonds; (v) pay directly for acquisition or construction of Facilities, or the cost of Services, to the extent that the inclusion of such amounts does not increase the Special Tax A levy on Final Mapped Property or Undeveloped Property; and (vi) provide an amount equal to Special Tax A delinquencies based on the historical delinquency rate for Special Tax A as determined by the CFD Administrator.
“Special Tax B” means the special tax authorized by the qualified electors of CFD No. 76 to be levied within the boundaries of CFD No. 76 to pay for Services. “Special Tax B Requirement” means for any Fiscal Year that amount required, after taking into account available amounts in any funds and accounts established to pay for Services, to pay the cost of Services, a pro rata share of Administrative Expenses, and an 3550
City of Ontario CFD No. 76 7 July 22, 2025
amount equal to Special Tax B delinquencies based on the historical delinquency rate for Special Tax B as determined by the CFD Administrator.
“Square Footage” or “Sq. Ft.” means the floor area square footage reflected on the original construction building permit, or as set forth in other official records maintained by the City’s Building Department or other appropriate means selected by CFD No. 76, issued for construction of Residential Property or Non-Residential Property, plus any square footage subsequently added to a building of Non-Residential Property after issuance of a building permit for expansion or renovation of such building. “State” means the State of California.
“Taxable Property” means, for each Fiscal Year, all of the Assessor’s Parcels within the boundaries of CFD No. 76 that are not exempt from the Special Taxes pursuant to law or Section E below.
“Taxable Property Owner Association Property” means, for each Fiscal Year, all Assessor’s Parcels of Property Owner Association Property that are not exempt from the Special Taxes pursuant to Section E below.
“Taxable Public Property” means, for each Fiscal Year, all Assessor’s Parcels of Public Property that are not exempt from the Special Taxes pursuant to law or Section E below. “Tentative Tract Map” means a map: (i) showing a proposed subdivision of an Assessor’s Parcel(s) and the conditions pertaining thereto; (ii) that may or may not be based on a detailed survey; and (iii) that is not recorded by the County to create legal lots. “Total Tax Burden” means, for a Unit within a Land Use Class, for the Fiscal Year in which the Total Tax Burden is being calculated, the sum of (a) the Assigned Special Tax A for such Land Use Class for such Fiscal Year, plus (b) the Special Tax B for such Land Use Class for such Fiscal Year, plus (c) the ad valorem property taxes, special assessments, special taxes for any overlapping community facilities districts, and any other governmental fees, charges (other than fees or charges for services such as sewer and trash), taxes, and assessments (which do not include Contractual Impositions) collected by the County on ad valorem tax bills, plus (d) property owner association assessments (but excluding the refuse collection portion of such assessments), and that the CFD Administrator estimates would be levied or imposed on such Unit in such Fiscal Year if the residential dwelling unit thereon or therein had been completed and sold, and was subject to such fees, charges, taxes, and assessments in such Fiscal Year.
“Trustee” means the trustee or fiscal agent under the Indenture. “TTM 20472” means Tentative Tract Map No. 20472, the area of which is located within CFD No. 76.
3551
City of Ontario CFD No. 76 8 July 22, 2025
“Undeveloped Property” means, for each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property not classified as Developed Property, Final Mapped Property, Taxable Public Property, or Taxable Property Owner Association Property.
“Unit” means an individual single-family detached or attached home, townhome, condominium, apartment, or other residential dwelling unit, including each separate living area within a half-plex, duplex, triplex, fourplex, or other residential structure.
B. ASSIGNMENT TO LAND USE CATEGORIES
Each Fiscal Year, beginning with Fiscal Year 2026-27, all Taxable Property within CFD No. 76 shall be classified as Developed Property, Final Mapped Property, Taxable Public Property, Taxable Property Owner Association Property, or Undeveloped Property, and shall be subject to Special Taxes in accordance with the Rate and Method of Apportionment as determined pursuant to Sections C and D below.
Assessor’s Parcels of Developed Property shall be further classified as: Single Family Property (and further classified as Single Family Attached Property or Single Family Detached Property, as needed) or Other Residential Property (for Special Tax A); Single Family Detached Dwelling Unit, Multiple Family Dwelling Unit, or Gated Community Attached Dwelling Unit (for Special Tax B); or Non-Residential Property. For Special Tax A, Assessor’s Parcels of Single Family Attached Property shall be assigned to Land Use Classes 1 through 6, and Single Family Detached Property shall be assigned to Land Use Classes 7 through 13, as listed in Table 1 below based on the Residential Floor Area of the Units on such Assessor’s Parcels. Also for Special Tax A, Other Residential Property and Non-Residential Property shall be assigned to Land Use Classes 14 and 15, respectively.
C. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX
1. Special Tax A
At least 30 days prior to the issuance of Bonds, the Assigned Special Tax A on Developed Property (set forth in Table 1 below) shall be analyzed in accordance with and subject to the conditions set forth in this Section C. At such time, CFD No. 76 shall select and engage a Price Point Consultant and the CFD Administrator shall request the Price Point Consultant to prepare a Price Point Study setting forth the Minimum Sale Price of Units within each Land Use Class.
If based upon such Price Point Study the CFD Administrator calculates that the Total Tax Burden applicable to Units within one or more Land Use Classes of Single Family Attached Property to be constructed within CFD No. 76 exceeds
2.55% of the Minimum Sale Price of Units of Single Family Attached Property, the Assigned Special Tax A shall be reduced to the extent necessary to cause the Total Tax Burden that shall apply to Units within such Land Use Class(es) not to exceed 2.55% of the Minimum Sale Price of such Units.
3552
City of Ontario CFD No. 76 9 July 22, 2025
In addition, if based upon such Price Point Study the CFD Administrator calculates that the Total Tax Burden applicable to Units within one or more Land Use Classes of Single Family Detached Property to be constructed within CFD No. 76 exceeds 2.15% of the Minimum Sale Price of Units of Single Family Detached Property, the Assigned Special Tax A shall be reduced to the extent necessary to cause the Total Tax Burden that shall apply to Units within such Land Use Class(es) not to exceed 2.15% of the Minimum Sale Price of such Units.
Finally, if based upon such Price Point Study the CFD Administrator calculates that the Total Tax Burden, excluding property owner association assessments, applicable to Units within one or more Land Use Classes of Single Family Property to be constructed within CFD No. 76 exceeds 1.95% of the Minimum Sale Price of such Units, the Assigned Special Tax A shall be reduced to the extent necessary to cause the Total Tax Burden, excluding property owner association assessments, that shall apply to Units within such Land Use Class(es) not to exceed 1.95% of the Minimum Sale Price of such Units.
Each Assigned Special Tax A reduction for a Land Use Class shall be calculated by the CFD Administrator separately, and it shall not be required that such reduction be proportionate among Land Use Classes. In connection with any reduction in the Assigned Special Tax A, the Backup Special Tax A shall also be reduced by the CFD Administrator based on the percentage reduction in Maximum Special Tax A revenues within the Tentative Tract Map area(s) where the Assigned Special Tax A reductions occurred. Upon determining the reductions, if any, in the Assigned Special Tax A and Backup Special Tax A required pursuant to this Section C, the CFD Administrator shall complete the Certificate of Modification of Special Tax substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “Certificate of Modification”), shall execute such completed Certificate of Modification, and shall deliver such executed Certificate of Modification to CFD No. 76. Upon receipt thereof, if in satisfactory form, CFD No. 76 shall execute such Certificate of Modification. The reduced Assigned Special Tax A and Backup Special Tax A specified in such Certificate of Modification shall become effective upon the execution of such Certificate of Modification by CFD No. 76.
The Special Tax A reductions required pursuant to this section shall be reflected in an amended notice of Special Tax lien, which CFD No. 76 shall cause to be recorded with the County Recorder as soon as practicable after execution of the Certificate of Modification by CFD No. 76. The reductions in this section apply to Single Family Property, but not to Other Residential Property or NonResidential Property. 3553
City of Ontario CFD No. 76 10 July 22, 2025
a. Developed Property
1) Maximum Special Tax A
The Maximum Special Tax A that may be levied in any Fiscal Year for each Assessor’s Parcel classified as Developed Property shall be the greater of (i) the amount derived by application of the Assigned Special Tax A or (ii) the amount derived by application of the Backup Special Tax A. The Maximum Special Tax A shall not increase in future years, other than as calculated pursuant to Section C.1.a.3 below.
2) Assigned Special Tax A
The Assigned Special Tax A that may be levied in any Fiscal Year for each Land Use Class is shown below in Table 1.
TABLE 1
ASSIGNED SPECIAL TAX A – DEVELOPED PROPERTY
3) Backup Special Tax A
The Backup Special Tax A shall be $2,058 per Unit of Single Family Attached Property and $5,181 per Unit of Single Family Land
Use
Class
Description
Residential
Floor Area
(Square
Footage)
Assigned
Special Tax A
1 Single Family Attached Property < 1,301 $1,194 per Unit 2 Single Family Attached Property 1,301 – 1,400 $1,623 per Unit 3 Single Family Attached Property 1,401 – 1,500 $1,841 per Unit 4 Single Family Attached Property 1,501 – 1,600 $2,001 per Unit 5 Single Family Attached Property 1,601 – 1,700 $2,379 per Unit 6 Single Family Attached Property > 1,700 $2,807 per Unit 7 Single Family Detached Property < 1,951 $3,954 per Unit 8 Single Family Detached Property 1,951 – 2,150 $4,326 per Unit 9 Single Family Detached Property 2,151 – 2,350 $4,916 per Unit 10 Single Family Detached Property 2,351 – 2,550 $5,355 per Unit 11 Single Family Detached Property 2,551 – 2,750 $5,840 per Unit 12 Single Family Detached Property 2,751 – 2,950 $5,981 per Unit 13 Single Family Detached Property > 2,950 $6,407 per Unit 14 Other Residential Property $57,987 per Acre
15 Non-Residential Property $57,987 per Acre
3554
City of Ontario CFD No. 76 11 July 22, 2025
Detached Property. However, if the Expected Residential Lot Count for Single Family Attached Property does not equal 154 and for Single Family Detached Property does not equal 196, and the City has not issued Bonds, then the Backup Special Tax A for Designated Buildable Lots of Single Family Attached Property and Single Family Detached Property shall be calculated according to the following formulas:
Attached = $316,904 Expected Residential Lot
Count for Single Family Attached
Property
Detached = $1,015,455 Expected Residential
Lot Count for Single Family
Detached Property
If any portion of a Final Subdivision Map, or any area expected by CFD No. 76 to become Final Mapped Property – such as the area within TTM 20472, or any other Tentative Tract Map – changes any time after the City has issued Bonds, causing an adjustment to the number of Designated Buildable Lots, then the Backup Special Tax A for all Designated Buildable Lots of Single Family Property subject to the change shall be calculated according to the following steps:
Step 1: Determine the total Backup Special Tax A that
could have been collected from Designated
Buildable Lots of Single Family Attached Property
or Single Family Detached Property prior to the
Final Subdivision Map or expected Final Mapped
Property change.
Step 2: Divide the amount determined in Step 1 by the
number of Designated Buildable Lots of Single
Family Attached Property or Single Family
Detached Property that exists after the Final
Subdivision Map or expected Final Mapped
Property change.
Step 3: Apply the amount determined in Step 2 as the
Backup Special Tax A per Unit for Single Family
Attached Property or Single Family Detached
Property.
The Backup Special Tax A for an Assessor’s Parcel shall not change once an Assessor’s Parcel is classified as Developed Property.
3555
City of Ontario CFD No. 76 12 July 22, 2025
b. Final Mapped Property, Taxable Public Property, Taxable Property Owner Association Property, and Undeveloped Property
The Maximum Special Tax A for Final Mapped Property, Taxable Public Property, Taxable Property Owner Association Property, and Undeveloped Property shall be $57,987 per Acre, and shall not be subject to increase or reduction and, therefore, shall remain the same in every Fiscal Year.
2. Special Tax B
The Maximum Special Tax B for each Assessor’s Parcel classified as Developed Property shall be determined by reference to Table 2 below.
TABLE 2
MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX B – DEVELOPED PROPERTY
Land Use Class Maximum Special Tax B
Fiscal Year 2026-27
Residential Property
Single Family Detached Dwelling Unit $1,426.38 per Unit Multiple Family Dwelling Unit $1,236.46 per Unit
Gated Community Attached Dwelling Unit $1,036.38 per Unit Non-Residential Property $0.260110 per Sq. Ft.
On January 1 of each Fiscal Year, commencing January 1, 2027, the Maximum Special Tax B to be applied in the next Fiscal Year shall be subject to an automatic increase at a rate equal to 4.0% of the amount in effect for the prior Fiscal Year.
3. Multiple Land Use Classes on an Assessor’s Parcel
In some instances an Assessor’s Parcel of Developed Property may contain more than one Land Use Class. The Maximum Special Tax A levied on such Assessor’s Parcel shall be the sum of the Maximum Special Tax A for all Units of Single Family Property and Acres of Other Residential Property and NonResidential Property (based on the pro rata share of Square Footage between Other Residential Property and Non-Residential Property, according to the applicable building permits, Final Subdivision Map, parcel map, condominium plan, or other recorded County map) located on that Assessor’s Parcel. The Maximum Special Tax B levied on such Assessor’s Parcel shall be the sum of the Maximum Special Tax B for all Units of Residential Property and all Square 3556
City of Ontario CFD No. 76 13 July 22, 2025
Footage of Non-Residential Property (based on the applicable building permits, Final Subdivision Map, parcel map, condominium plan, or other recorded County map) located on that Assessor’s Parcel.
4. Developed Property Special Tax Obligation
Once an Assessor’s Parcel has been taxed in any Fiscal Year as Developed Property, the Assessor’s Parcel shall continue to be taxed as Developed Property regardless of changes to or expiration of the original building permit, and regardless of revisions to or destruction of the structure that was, or was expected to be, constructed pursuant to the original building permit.
D. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX
1. Special Tax A
Each Fiscal Year, beginning with Fiscal Year 2026-27, the CFD Administrator shall determine the Special Tax A Requirement for such Fiscal Year. The Special Tax A shall then be levied as follows:
First: If needed to satisfy the Special Tax A Requirement, Special Tax A shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor’s Parcel of Developed Property up to 100% of the applicable Assigned Special Tax A;
Second: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax A Requirement after the first step has been completed, then Special Tax A shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor’s Parcel of Final Mapped Property up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax A for Final Mapped Property;
Third: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax A Requirement after the first two steps have been completed, then Special Tax A shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor’s Parcel of Undeveloped Property up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax A for Undeveloped Property;
Fourth: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax A Requirement after the first three steps have been completed, then the levy of Special Tax A on each Assessor’s Parcel of Developed Property whose Maximum Special Tax A is determined through the application of the Backup Special Tax A shall be increased Proportionately from the Assigned Special Tax A up to the Maximum Special Tax A for each such Assessor’s Parcel;
Fifth: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax A Requirement after the first four steps have been completed, then Special Tax A shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor’s Parcel of Taxable Property Owner Association Property up to the Maximum Special Tax A for Taxable Property Owner Association Property; Sixth: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax A Requirement after the first five steps have been completed, then Special Tax A shall be levied Proportionately 3557
City of Ontario CFD No. 76 14 July 22, 2025
on each Assessor’s Parcel of Taxable Public Property up to the Maximum Special Tax A for Taxable Public Property.
Notwithstanding the above, under no circumstances shall Special Tax A levied in any Fiscal Year on any Assessor’s Parcel of Single Family Property or Other Residential Property for which an occupancy permit for private residential use has been issued be increased as a result of delinquency or default by the owner or owners of any other Assessor’s Parcel or Assessor’s Parcels within CFD No. 76 by more than ten percent above the amount that would have been levied in that Fiscal Year had there never been any such delinquencies or defaults.
2. Special Tax B
Each Fiscal Year, beginning with Fiscal Year 2026-27, the CFD Administrator shall determine the Special Tax B Requirement. The Special Tax B shall then be levied Proportionately on each Assessor’s Parcel of Developed Property up to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax B for such Assessor’s Parcel, until the Special Tax B Requirement is satisfied. However, the Special Tax B levied in any Fiscal Year shall not increase by more than 4.0% of the amount of the Special Tax B levied in the prior Fiscal Year.
E. EXEMPTIONS
No Special Tax shall be levied on up to 10.97 Acres of Public Property and up to 14.55 Acres of Property Owner Association Property. Tax-exempt status will be assigned by the CFD Administrator in the chronological order in which property becomes Public Property or Property Owner Association Property.
Property Owner Association Property or Public Property that is not exempt from the Special Tax A under this section shall be subject to the levy of Special Tax A and shall be taxed Proportionately as part of the fifth or sixth step, respectively, in Section D above, up to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax A for Taxable Property Owner Association Property and Taxable Public Property. No Special Tax A shall be levied in any Fiscal Year on Assessor’s Parcels that have fully prepaid the Special Tax A obligation pursuant to the formula set forth in Section H.
No Special Tax shall be levied on Lower Income Household Welfare Exemption Property; provided, however, that if, in any Fiscal Year, applicable law does not require that Lower Income Household Welfare Exemption Property be exempt from some portion, or all, of the Special Tax, such portion, or all, of the Special Tax shall be levied on such property in accordance with this Rate and Method of Apportionment based on the Land Use Class to which the Assessor’s Parcel is assigned.
F. APPEALS
Any property owner may file a written appeal of the Special Tax with CFD No. 76 claiming that the amount or application of the Special Tax is not correct. The appeal must be filed not later than one calendar year after having paid the Special Tax that is 3558
City of Ontario CFD No. 76 15 July 22, 2025
disputed, and the appellant must be current in all payments of Special Taxes. In addition, during the term of the appeal process, all Special Taxes levied must be paid on or before the payment date established when the levy was made.
The appeal must specify the reasons why the appellant claims the Special Tax is in error.
The CFD Administrator shall review the appeal, meet with the appellant if the CFD Administrator deems necessary, and advise the appellant of its determination.
If the property owner disagrees with the CFD Administrator’s decision relative to the appeal, the owner may then file a written appeal with the City Council whose subsequent decision shall be final and binding on all interested parties. If the decision of the CFD Administrator or subsequent decision by the City Council requires the Special Tax to be modified or changed in favor of the property owner, then the CFD Administrator shall determine if sufficient Special Tax revenue is available to make a cash refund. If a cash refund cannot be made, then an adjustment shall be made to credit future Special Tax levy(ies).
This procedure shall be exclusive and its exhaustion by any property owner shall be a condition precedent to filing any legal action by such owner.
G. MANNER OF COLLECTION
The Special Taxes shall be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem property taxes; provided, however, that the Special Taxes may be collected in such other manner as the City Council shall determine, including direct billing of affected property owners.
H. PREPAYMENT OF SPECIAL TAX A
The following definitions apply to this Section H:
“CFD Public Facilities” means $16,638,000 for each Prepayment Period, or such lower number as determined by the City Council to be sufficient to fund the Facilities and Services to be provided by CFD No. 76.
“Expenditures Fund” means funds or accounts, regardless of their names, that are established to hold moneys that are available to acquire or construct Facilities and to fund Services.
“Future Facilities Costs” means the CFD Public Facilities minus (i) Facilities and Services costs previously paid from the Expenditures Fund during the Prepayment Period in which the prepayment is being made, (ii) moneys currently on deposit in the Expenditures Fund from deposits made during the Prepayment Period in which the prepayment is being made, and (iii) moneys currently on deposit in an escrow fund that are expected to be available to finance Facilities costs. In no event shall the amount of Future Facilities Costs be less than zero.
3559
City of Ontario CFD No. 76 16 July 22, 2025
“Prepayment Period” means one of three periods of time during which a Special Tax prepayment may be made.
“Prepayment Period 1” means July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2060. “Prepayment Period 2” means July 1, 2060, through June 30, 2093. “Prepayment Period 3” means July 1, 2093, through June 30, 2127.
Only Special Tax A may be prepaid; Special Tax B shall continue to be levied on an annual basis on all Developed Property in CFD No. 76.
1. Prepayment in Full
The obligation of an Assessor's Parcel to pay the Special Tax A may be prepaid as described herein, provided that a prepayment may be made only for Assessor’s Parcels for which a building permit for new construction was issued after January 1, 2025, and only if there are no delinquent Special Taxes with respect to such Assessor's Parcel at the time of prepayment. An owner of an Assessor's Parcel intending to prepay the Special Tax A obligation shall provide the CFD Administrator with written notice of intent to prepay. Within 30 days of receipt of such written notice, the CFD Administrator shall notify such owner of the prepayment amount for such Assessor's Parcel. The CFD Administrator may charge a fee for providing this service. Prepayment in any six month period must be made not less than 45 days prior to the next occurring date that notice of redemption of Bonds from the proceeds of such prepayment may be given to the Trustee pursuant to the Indenture.
The Special Tax A Prepayment Amount (defined below) shall be calculated as summarized below (capitalized terms as defined below):
Bond Redemption Amount
plus Redemption Premium
plus Future Facilities Amount
plus Defeasance Amount
plus Administrative Fees and Expenses
less Reserve Fund Credit
Total Prepayment Amount
As of the proposed date of prepayment, the Special Tax A Prepayment Amount (defined below) shall be calculated by the CFD Administrator as follows:
Paragraph No.
1. Confirm that no Special Tax delinquencies apply to such Assessor’s Parcel, and determine the Prepayment Period for the proposed prepayment. 3560
City of Ontario CFD No. 76 17 July 22, 2025
2. Compute the Assigned Special Tax A and Backup Special Tax A for the Assessor’s Parcel to be prepaid based on the Developed Property Special Tax A which is, or could be, charged in the current Fiscal Year. For Assessor’s Parcels of Final Mapped Property (for which a building permit has been issued but which is not yet classified as Developed Property) to be prepaid, compute the Assigned Special Tax A and Backup Special Tax A for that Assessor’s Parcel as though it was already designated as Developed Property, based upon the building permit which has already been issued for that Assessor’s Parcel.
3. (a) Divide the Assigned Special Tax A computed pursuant to Paragraph 2 by the total estimated Assigned Special Tax A for CFD No. 76 based on the Developed Property Special Tax A which could be charged in the current Fiscal Year on all expected development through buildout of CFD No. 76, excluding any Assessor’s Parcels which have been prepaid, and
(b) Divide the Backup Special Tax A computed pursuant to Paragraph 2 by the estimated total Backup Special Tax A at buildout of CFD No. 76, excluding any Assessor’s Parcels which have been prepaid.
4. Multiply the larger quotient computed pursuant to Paragraph 3(a) or 3(b) by the Outstanding Bonds to compute the amount of Outstanding Bonds to be retired and prepaid (the “Bond Redemption Amount”).
5. Multiply the Bond Redemption Amount computed pursuant to Paragraph 4 by the applicable redemption premium (e.g., the redemption price minus 100%), if any, on the Outstanding Bonds to be redeemed (the “Redemption Premium”).
6. Compute the Future Facilities Costs for the applicable Prepayment Period.
7. Multiply the larger quotient computed pursuant to Paragraph 3(a) or 3(b) by the amount determined pursuant to Paragraph 6 to compute the amount of Future Facilities Costs to be prepaid (the “Future Facilities Amount”).
8. Compute the amount needed to pay interest on the Bond Redemption Amount from the first bond interest and/or principal payment date following the current Fiscal Year until the earliest redemption date for the Outstanding Bonds.
9. Determine the Special Tax A levied on the Assessor’s Parcel in the current Fiscal Year which has not yet been paid.
10. Add the amounts computed pursuant to Paragraphs 8 and 9 to determine the “Defeasance Amount”.
11. Verify the administrative fees and expenses of CFD No. 76, including the costs to compute the prepayment, the costs to invest the prepayment proceeds, the costs to redeem Bonds, and the costs to record any notices to evidence the prepayment and the redemption (the “Administrative Fees and Expenses”). 3561
City of Ontario CFD No. 76 18 July 22, 2025
12. If reserve funds for the Outstanding Bonds, if any, are at or above 100% of the reserve requirement (as defined in the Indenture) on the prepayment date, a reserve fund credit shall be calculated as a reduction in the applicable reserve fund for the Outstanding Bonds to be redeemed pursuant to the prepayment (the “Reserve Fund Credit”). No Reserve Fund Credit shall be granted if reserve funds are below 100% of the reserve requirement on the prepayment date or the redemption date.
13. The Special Tax A prepayment is equal to the sum of the amounts computed pursuant to Paragraphs 4, 5, 7, 10, and 11, less the amount computed pursuant to Paragraph 12 (the “Prepayment Amount”).
14. From the Prepayment Amount, the amounts computed pursuant to Paragraphs 4, 5, 10, and 12 shall be deposited into the appropriate fund as established under the Indenture and be used to retire Outstanding Bonds or make debt service payments. The amount computed pursuant to Paragraph 7 shall be deposited into the Expenditures Fund. The amount computed pursuant to Paragraph 11 shall be retained by CFD No. 76.
The Special Tax A Prepayment Amount may be sufficient to redeem other than a $5,000 increment of Bonds. In such cases, the increment above $5,000, or integral multiple thereof, will be retained in the appropriate fund established under the Indenture to be used with the next prepayment of Bonds or to make debt service payments.
As a result of the payment of the current Fiscal Year’s Special Tax A levy as determined under Paragraph 9 (above), the CFD Administrator shall remove the current Fiscal Year’s Special Tax A levy for such Assessor’s Parcel from the County tax rolls. With respect to any Assessor's Parcel that is prepaid during Prepayment Period 3, the CFD Administrator shall cause a suitable notice to be recorded in compliance with the Act to indicate that Special Tax A has been prepaid and that the obligation of such Assessor's Parcel to pay Special Tax A shall cease.
With respect to Special Tax A for any Assessor’s Parcel that is prepaid during Prepayment Period 1 or Prepayment Period 2, the obligation of such Assessor’s Parcel to pay Special Tax A shall be tolled, or suspended, through the end of such Prepayment Period, but shall resume in the first Fiscal Year of the subsequent Prepayment Period.
The CFD Administrator shall cause a suitable notice to be recorded in compliance with the Act to indicate that Special Tax A has been satisfied for the remainder of the applicable Prepayment Period but has not been permanently satisfied and the obligation to pay Special Tax A will resume in the first Fiscal Year of the Prepayment Period following the Prepayment Period in which the prepayment was made. Once the obligation of an Assessor’s Parcel to pay Special Tax A resumes, Special Tax A for the then applicable Prepayment Period may be prepaid.
3562
City of Ontario CFD No. 76 19 July 22, 2025
Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Special Tax A prepayment shall be allowed unless the amount of Maximum Special Tax A that may be levied on Taxable Property within CFD No. 76 (after excluding 10.97 Acres of Public Property and 14.55 Acres of Property Owner Association Property) both prior to and after the proposed prepayment is at least
1.1 times the maximum annual debt service on all Outstanding Bonds.
2. Prepayment in Part
The Special Tax A on an Assessor’s Parcel for which a building permit for new construction was issued after January 1, 2025, may be partially prepaid. The amount of the prepayment shall be calculated as in Section H.1, except that a partial prepayment shall be calculated by the CFD Administrator according to the following formula:
PP = (PF – AE) x % + AE.
The terms above have the following meaning:
PP = the partial prepayment
PF = the Prepayment Amount (full prepayment) for Special Tax A calculated according to Section H.1
AE = the Administrative Fees and Expenses determined pursuant to paragraph 11 above % = the percentage by which the owner of the Assessor’s Parcel(s) is partially prepaying Special Tax A
The Special Tax A partial prepayment amount must be sufficient to redeem at least a $5,000 increment of Bonds.
The owner of any Assessor’s Parcel who desires such prepayment shall notify the CFD Administrator of such owner’s intent to partially prepay Special Tax A and the percentage by which Special Tax A shall be prepaid. The CFD Administrator shall provide the owner with a statement of the amount required for the partial prepayment of Special Tax A for an Assessor’s Parcel within thirty (30) days of the request and may charge a fee for providing this service. With respect to any Assessor’s Parcel that is partially prepaid, the CFD Administrator shall (i) distribute the remitted prepayment funds according to Section H.1, and (ii) indicate in the records of CFD No. 76 that there has been a partial prepayment of Special Tax A and that a portion of Special Tax A with respect to such Assessor’s Parcel, equal to the outstanding percentage (100% - “%”, as defined above) of the Maximum Special Tax A, shall continue to be levied on such Assessor’s Parcel pursuant to Section D during the Prepayment Period in which the partial prepayment is made.
For partial prepayments made during Prepayment Period 1 or Prepayment Period 2, the full amount of Special Tax A shall resume in the first Fiscal Year of the Prepayment Period following the Prepayment Period in which the partial prepayment was made.
Once the obligation of an Assessor’s Parcel to pay Special Tax A resumes, Special Tax A for the then applicable Prepayment Period may be prepaid. 3563
City of Ontario CFD No. 76 20 July 22, 2025
I. TERM OF SPECIAL TAX
The Fiscal Year after which no further Special Tax A shall be levied or collected is Fiscal Year 2126-2127, except that Special Tax A that was lawfully levied in or before such Fiscal Year and that remains delinquent may be collected in subsequent years. Special Tax B shall continue to be levied indefinitely on an annual basis on all Developed Property in CFD No. 76.
3564
EXHIBIT A
CERTIFICATE OF MODIFICATION OF SPECIAL TAX A
(PAGE 1 OF 3)
CITY OF ONTARIO AND CFD NO. 76 CERTIFICATE
1. Pursuant to Section C.1 of the Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax (the “Rate and Method”) for City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 76 (Compass Pointe) (“CFD No. 76”), the Assigned Special Tax A and the Backup Special Tax A for Developed Property within CFD No. 76 has been modified. a. The information in Table 1 below relating to Assigned Special Tax A for Developed Property within CFD No. 76, as stated in Section C.1.a.2 of the Rate and Method of Apportionment, has been modified as follows:
TABLE 1
ASSIGNED SPECIAL TAX A – DEVELOPED PROPERTY
Land
Use
Class
Description
Residential
Floor Area
(Square
Footage)
Assigned
Special Tax A
1 Single Family Attached Property < 1,301 $[ ] per Unit 2 Single Family Attached Property 1,301 – 1,400 $[ ] per Unit 3 Single Family Attached Property 1,401 – 1,500 $[ ] per Unit 4 Single Family Attached Property 1,501 – 1,600 $[ ] per Unit 5 Single Family Attached Property 1,601 – 1,700 $[ ] per Unit 6 Single Family Attached Property > 1,700 $[ ] per Unit 7 Single Family Detached Property < 1,951 $[ ] per Unit 8 Single Family Detached Property 1,951 – 2,150 $[ ] per Unit 9 Single Family Detached Property 2,151 – 2,350 $[ ] per Unit 10 Single Family Detached Property 2,351 – 2,550 $[ ] per Unit 11 Single Family Detached Property 2,551 – 2,750 $[ ] per Unit 12 Single Family Detached Property 2,751 – 2,950 $[ ] per Unit 13 Single Family Detached Property > 2,950 $[ ] per Unit 14 Other Residential Property $[ ] per Acre
15 Non-Residential Property $[ ] per Acre
3565
EXHIBIT A
CERTIFICATE OF MODIFICATION OF SPECIAL TAX A
(PAGE 2 OF 3)
b. The Backup Special Tax for Developed Property, as stated in Section C.1.a.3, shall be modified as follows:
The Backup Special Tax A shall be $[ ] per Unit of Single Family Attached Property and $[ ] per Unit of Single Family Detached Property. However, if the Expected Residential Lot Count for Single Family Attached Property does not equal 154 and for Single Family Detached Property does not equal 196, and the City has not issued Bonds, then the Backup Special Tax A for Designated Buildable Lots of Single Family Attached Property and Single Family Detached Property shall be calculated according to the following formulas:
Attached = $[ ] Expected Residential Lot
Count for Single Family Attached
Property
Detached = $[ ] Expected Residential Lot
Count for Single Family Detached
Property
2. The Special Tax A for Developed Property may only be modified prior to the first issuance of CFD No. 76 Bonds.
3. Upon execution of this certificate by CFD No. 76, CFD No. 76 shall cause an amended notice of Special Tax lien for CFD No. 76 to be recorded reflecting the modifications set forth herein.
3566
EXHIBIT A
CERTIFICATE OF MODIFICATION OF SPECIAL TAX A
(PAGE 3 OF 3)
Capitalized undefined terms used herein have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Rate and Method. The modifications set forth in this Certificate have been calculated by the CFD Administrator in accordance with the Rate and Method.
GOODWIN CONSULTING GROUP, INC.
CFD ADMINISTRATOR
By:_________________________________ Date:______________________
The undersigned acknowledges receipt of this Certificate and of the modification of the Assigned Special Tax A and Backup Special Tax A for Developed Property as set forth in this Certificate.
CITY OF ONTARIO
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 76
(COMPASS POINTE)
By:_________________________________ Date:______________________ 3567
RESOLUTION NO. _____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO,
CALIFORNIA, DEEMING IT NECESSARY FOR CITY OF ONTARIO
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 76 (COMPASS POINTE) TO INCUR BONDED INDEBTEDNESS.
WHEREAS, on September 16, 2025, the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of Ontario (the “City”), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the “Act”), adopted a resolution entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Ontario, California, of Intention to Establish a Community Facilities District Proposed to be Named City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 76 (Compass Pointe) and to Authorize the Levy of a Special Tax Therein,” stating its intention to establish City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 76 (Compass Pointe) (the “Community Facilities District”) and to authorize the Community Facilities District to levy a special tax (the “Special Tax”) within the Community Facilities District for the purpose of financing certain public facilities (the “Facilities”) and services; and
WHEREAS, on September 16, 2025, the City Council also adopted a resolution entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Ontario, California, Declaring it Necessary for City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 76 (Compass Pointe) to Incur Bonded Indebtedness” (the “Resolution Declaring Necessity”), declaring it necessary for the Community Facilities District to incur bonded indebtedness and setting the date for a public hearing to be held on the proposed debt authorization; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Resolution Declaring Necessity, notice of said public hearing was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the area of the Community Facilities District, in accordance with the Act; and
WHEREAS, on this date, the City Council opened, conducted and closed said public hearing; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, any person interested, including persons owning property within the area and desiring to appear and present any matters material to the questions set forth in the Resolution Declaring Necessity appeared and presented such matters; and
WHEREAS, oral or written protests against the proposed debt issue were not made or filed at or before said public hearing by 50% or more of the registered voters, or six registered voters, whichever is more, residing within the territory proposed to be included in the Community Facilities District, or the owners of one-half or more of the area of land in the territory proposed to be included in the Community Facilities District and not exempt from the Special Tax; and
WHEREAS, the City Council deems it necessary for the Community Facilities District to incur bonded indebtedness; and
3568
WHEREAS, on this date, the City Council adopted a resolution entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Ontario, California, of Formation of City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 76 (Compass Pointe), Proposing that the Community Facilities District Be Authorized to Levy a Special Tax and Proposing that an Appropriations Limit of the Community Facilities District Be Established;” and WHEREAS, the City Clerk of the City (the “City Clerk”) is the election official that will conduct the special election on the proposition to authorize the Community Facilities District to incur bonded indebtedness; and
WHEREAS, there has been filed with the City Clerk a letter from the Registrar of Voters of the County of San Bernardino indicating that no persons were registered to vote within the territory of the Community Facilities District as of October 23, 2025, which demonstrates that 12 or more persons have not been registered to vote within the territory of the Community Facilities District for each of the 90 days preceding the close of said public hearing; and
WHEREAS, there has been filed with the City Clerk consents and waivers of all of the landowners of record in the Community Facilities District consenting to the waiver of, and waiving, any time limit specified by Section 53326 of the Act and any requirement pertaining to the conduct of said special election, including any time limit or requirement applicable to an election pursuant to Article 5 of the Act (commencing with Section 53345 of the Act), consenting to the holding of said special election on November 4, 2025, and consenting to the waiver of, and waiving, any impartial analysis, arguments or rebuttals, as set forth in Sections 53326 and 53327 of the Act; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk has concurred in said waivers and has concurred in holding said special election on November 4, 2025.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Ontario as follows:
SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct, and the City Council so finds and determines.
SECTION 2. The City Council deems it necessary for the Community Facilities District to incur the bonded indebtedness.
SECTION 3. The bonded indebtedness will be incurred for the purpose of financing the costs of the Facilities, including all costs and estimated costs incidental to, or connected with, the accomplishment of said purpose, including, but not limited to, such costs and estimated costs as are described in Section 53345.3 of the Act.
SECTION 4. In accordance with the previous determination of the City Council, the whole of the Community Facilities District will pay for the bonded indebtedness.
SECTION 5. The maximum amount of debt to be incurred is $60,000,000. 3569
SECTION 6. The maximum term the bonds to be issued shall run before maturity is 40 years.
SECTION 7. The maximum annual rate of interest to be paid shall not exceed the maximum interest rate permitted by applicable law at the time of sale of the bonds, payable semiannually or at such times as the City Council or its designee shall determine, the actual rate or rates and times of payment of such interest to be determined by the City Council or its designee at the time or times of sale of the bonds.
SECTION 8. The proposition to authorize the Community Facilities District to incur the bonded indebtedness shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the Community Facilities District.
SECTION 9. The City Council hereby finds and determines that no persons were registered to vote within the territory of the Community Facilities District as of October 23, 2025, and that 12 or more persons have not been registered to vote within the territory of the Community Facilities District for each of the 90 days preceding the close of the public hearing held by the City Council on the proposed debt issue for the Community Facilities District. Accordingly, pursuant to Section 53326 of the Act, the vote shall be by the landowners of the Community Facilities District and each person who is the owner of land as of the close of said public hearing, or the authorized representative thereof, shall have one vote for each acre or portion of an acre that he or she owns within the Community Facilities District not exempt from the Special Tax.
SECTION 10. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the qualified electors of the Community Facilities District have (a) unanimously consented to the waiver of, and have waived, any time limit specified by Section 53326 of the Act and any requirement pertaining to the conduct of said election, including any time limit or requirement applicable to an election pursuant to Article 5 of the Act (commencing with Section 53345 of the Act), (b) unanimously consented to the holding of said election on November 4, 2025, and (c) unanimously consented to the waiver of, and have waived, any impartial analysis, arguments or rebuttals, as set forth in Sections 53326 and 53327 of the Act. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the City Clerk has concurred in said waivers and has concurred in holding said election on November 4, 2025.
SECTION 11. The date of the special community facilities district election (which shall be consolidated with the special district election to authorize the Community Facilities District to levy the Special Tax) at which time the proposition to authorize the Community Facilities District to incur the bonded indebtedness shall be submitted to the voters is November 4, 2025.
SECTION 12. As authorized by Section 53353.5 of the Act, the propositions to authorize the Community Facilities District to incur such bonded indebtedness, to authorize the Community Facilities to levy the Special Tax and to establish an appropriations limit of the Community Facilities District shall be combined into one ballot proposition.
3570
SECTION 13. Pursuant to Section 53326 of the Act, the election shall be conducted by mail or hand-delivered ballot. The voted ballots are required to be received in the office of the City Clerk no later than 7:30 p.m. on November 4, 2025; provided, however, that if all of the qualified electors have voted prior to such time, the election may be closed with the concurrence of the City Clerk.
SECTION 14. All actions heretofore taken by the officers, employees and agents of the City with respect to the incurrence of bonded indebtedness by the Community Facilities District, or in connection with or related to any of the matters referred to herein, are hereby approved, confirmed and ratified.
SECTION 15. The officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions and do all things that they, or any of them, may deem necessary or desirable to accomplish the purposes of this Resolution and not inconsistent with the provisions hereof.
SECTION 16. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
The City Clerk of the City of Ontario shall certify as to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 4
th day of November 2025.
_____________________________________
PAUL S. LEON, MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________________
SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________________
BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
CITY ATTORNEY
3571
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
CITY OF ONTARIO )
I, SHEILA MAUTZ, City Clerk of the City of Ontario, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that foregoing Resolution No. 2025- was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Ontario at their regular meeting held November 4, 2025 by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
____________________________________
SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
The foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 2025- duly passed and adopted by the Ontario City Council at their regular meeting held November 4, 2025. _____________________________________
SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
3572
RESOLUTION NO. _______
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO,
CALIFORNIA, CALLING SPECIAL ELECTION FOR CITY OF ONTARIO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 76 (COMPASS POINTE).
WHEREAS, on this date, the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of Ontario (the “City”), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the “Act”), adopted a resolution entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Ontario, California, of Formation of City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 76 (Compass Pointe), Proposing that the Community Facilities District be Authorized to Levy a Special Tax and Proposing that an Appropriations Limit of the Community Facilities District Be Established” (the “Resolution of Formation”), establishing City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 76 (Compass Pointe) (the “Community Facilities District”), proposing that the Community Facilities District be authorized to levy a special tax (the “Special Tax”) within the Community Facilities District for the purpose of financing certain public facilities (the “Facilities”) and services and proposing that an appropriations limit of the Community Facilities District be established at $60,000,000; and
WHEREAS, on this date, the City Council also adopted a resolution entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Ontario, California, Deeming it Necessary for City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 76 (Compass Pointe) to Incur Bonded Indebtedness” (the “Resolution Deeming Necessity”), deeming it necessary for the Community Facilities District to incur bonded indebtedness in a maximum amount of $60,000,000; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Act and said resolutions, the propositions to authorize the Community Facilities District to incur such bonded indebtedness, to authorize the Community Facilities District to levy the Special Tax and to establish such appropriations limit of the Community Facilities District are to be submitted to the qualified electors of the Community Facilities District at a special election; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to designate the City Clerk of the City (the “City Clerk”) as the election official for such special election; and WHEREAS, there has been filed with the City Clerk a letter from the Registrar of Voters of the County of San Bernardino indicating that no persons were registered to vote within the territory of the Community Facilities District as of October 23, 2025, which demonstrates that 12 or more persons have not been registered to vote within the territory of the Community Facilities District for each of the 90 days preceding the close of the public hearings on the establishment of the Community Facilities District and the proposed debt issue for the Community Facilities District; and WHEREAS, there has been filed with the City Clerk consents and waivers of all of the landowners of record in the Community Facilities District consenting to the waiver of, and waiving, any time limit specified by Section 53326 of the Act and any requirement pertaining to the conduct of said special election, including any time limit or requirement 3573
applicable to an election pursuant to Article 5 of the Act (commencing with Section 53345 of the Act), consenting to the holding of said special election on November 4, 2025 and consenting to the waiver of, and waiving, any impartial analysis, arguments or rebuttals, as set forth in Sections 53326 and 53327 of the Act; and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk has concurred in said waivers and has concurred in holding said special election on November 4, 2025.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Ontario as follows:
SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct, and the City Council so finds and determines.
SECTION 2. Pursuant to Sections 53351, 53326 and 53325.7 of the Act, the propositions to authorize the Community Facilities District to incur bonded indebtedness, to authorize the Community Facilities District to levy the Special Tax and to establish the appropriations limit of the Community Facilities District shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the Community Facilities District at an election called therefor as provided below.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby designated as the official to conduct said election.
SECTION 4. As authorized by Section 53353.5 of the Act, the propositions to authorize the Community Facilities District to incur such bonded indebtedness, to authorize the Community Facilities District to levy the Special Tax and to establish such appropriations limit of the Community Facilities District shall be combined into one ballot proposition.
SECTION 5. The City Council hereby finds and determines that no persons were registered to vote within the territory of the Community Facilities District as of October 23, 2025, and that 12 or more persons have not been registered to vote within the territory of the Community Facilities District for each of the 90 days preceding the close of the public hearings heretofore held by the City Council on the establishment of the Community Facilities District and the proposed debt issue for the Community Facilities District. Accordingly, pursuant to Section 53326 of the Act, the vote shall be by the landowners of the Community Facilities District and each person who is the owner of land as of the close of said public hearings, or the authorized representative thereof, shall have one vote for each acre or portion of an acre that he or she owns within the Community Facilities District not exempt from the Special Tax.
SECTION 6. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the qualified electors of the Community Facilities District have (a) unanimously consented to the waiver of, and have waived, any time limit specified by Section 53326 of the Act and any requirement pertaining to the conduct of said election, including any time limit or requirement applicable to an election pursuant to Article 5 of the Act (commencing with Section 53345 of the Act), (b) unanimously consented to the holding of said election on November 4, 2025, and (c) unanimously consented to the waiver of, and have waived, 3574
any impartial analysis, arguments or rebuttals, as set forth in Sections 53326 and 53327 of the Act. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the City Clerk has concurred in said waivers and has concurred in holding said election on November 4, 2025.
SECTION 7. The City Council hereby calls a special election to submit to the qualified electors of the Community Facilities District the combined ballot proposition to authorize the Community Facilities District to incur bonded indebtedness in a maximum amount of $60,000,000, to authorize the Community Facilities to levy the Special Tax and to establish the appropriations limit of the Community Facilities District at $60,000,000, which election shall be held at 303 East B Street, Ontario, California, on November 4, 2025. The City Council has caused to be provided to the City Clerk, as the official to conduct the election, the Resolution of Formation, the Resolution Deeming Necessity, a certified map of sufficient scale and clarity to show the boundaries of the Community Facilities District and a sufficient description to allow the City Clerk to determine the boundaries of the Community Facilities District.
The voted ballots shall be returned to the City Clerk not later than 7:30 p.m. on November 4, 2025; provided, however, that if all of the qualified electors have voted prior to such time, the election may be closed with the concurrence of the City Clerk.
SECTION 8. Pursuant to Section 53326 of the Act, the election shall be conducted by mail or hand-delivered ballot pursuant to Section 4000 et. seq. of the California Elections Code. Except as otherwise provided in the Act, the provisions of law regulating elections of the City, insofar as they may be applicable, shall govern the election.
SECTION 9. The form of the ballot for the election, which sets forth the measure to be submitted to the voters, is attached hereto as Exhibit A and by this reference incorporated herein, and such form of ballot is hereby approved. The City Clerk shall cause to be delivered to each of the qualified electors of the Community Facilities District a ballot in said form, together with all supplies and written instructions necessary for the use and return of the ballot. The number of votes to be voted by a particular landowner shall be specified on the ballot provided to that landowner.
The identification envelope for return of a ballot shall be enclosed with such ballot, shall have the return postage prepaid, and shall contain: (a) the name and address of the landowner, (b) a declaration, under penalty of perjury, stating that the voter is the owner of record or the authorized representative of the landowner entitled to vote and is the person whose name appears on the identification envelope, (c) the printed name and signature of the voter, (d) the date of signing and place of execution of the declaration described in clause (b) above, and (e) a notice that the envelope contains an official ballot and is to be opened only by the canvassing board.
Analysis and arguments with respect to the measure submitted to the voters are hereby waived, as provided in Section 53327 of the Act. 3575
SECTION 10. The City Clerk shall accept the ballots of the qualified electors in the office of the City Clerk at 303 East B Street, Ontario, California, to and including 7:30 p.m. on November 4, 2025, whether said ballots be personally delivered or received by mail. The City Clerk shall have available ballots that may be marked at said location on the election day by said qualified electors.
SECTION 11. The City Council hereby determines that the facilities and services financed by the Community Facilities District are necessary to meet increased demands placed upon local agencies as a result of development occurring in the Community Facilities District.
SECTION 12. The specific purpose of the bonded indebtedness that the Community Facilities District is proposed to be authorized to incur is the financing of the Facilities, including all costs and estimated costs incidental to, or connected with, the accomplishment of such purpose, and the proceeds of such bonded indebtedness shall be applied only to such specific purpose.
Upon approval of the proposition to authorize the Community Facilities District to incur bonded indebtedness, and the sale of any bonds evidencing such indebtedness, the City Council shall take such action as may be necessary to cause to be established an account for deposit of the proceeds of sale of the bonds. For so long as any proceeds of the bonds remain unexpended, the Executive Director of Finance of the City shall cause to be filed with the City Council, no later than January 1 of each year, a report stating (a) the amount of bond proceeds received and expended during the preceding year, and (b) the status of any project funded or to be funded from bond proceeds. Said report may relate to the calendar year, fiscal year, or other appropriate annual period, as the Executive Director of Finance of the City shall determine, and may be incorporated into the annual budget, audit, or other appropriate routine report to the City Council.
SECTION 13. All actions heretofore taken by the officers, employees and agents of the City with respect to the special election called pursuant hereto, or in connection with or related to any of the matters referred to herein, are hereby approved, confirmed and ratified.
SECTION 14. The officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions and do all things that they, or any of them, may deem necessary or desirable to accomplish the purposes of this Resolution and not inconsistent with the provisions hereof.
SECTION 15. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
The City Clerk of the City of Ontario shall certify as to the adoption of this Resolution.
3576
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 4
th day of November 2025.
_____________________________________
PAUL S. LEON, MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________________
SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________________
BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
CITY ATTORNEY
3577
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
CITY OF ONTARIO )
I, SHEILA MAUTZ, City Clerk of the City of Ontario, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that foregoing Resolution No. 2025- was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Ontario at their regular meeting held November 4, 2025 by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
____________________________________
SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
The foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 2025- duly passed and adopted by the Ontario City Council at their regular meeting held November 4, 2025. _____________________________________
SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
3578
EXHIBIT A
OFFICIAL BALLOT
CITY OF ONTARIO
November 4, 2025
SPECIAL ELECTION
This ballot is for a special, landowner election. The number of votes to be voted pursuant to this ballot is ____.
INSTRUCTIONS TO VOTERS:
To vote on the measure, mark a cross (+ or X) in the voting square after the word “YES” or after the word “NO”. All distinguishing marks or erasures are forbidden and make the ballot void. If you wrongly mark, tear or deface this ballot, return it to the City Clerk of the City of Ontario and obtain another.
CITY OF ONTARIO
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 76
(COMPASS POINTE)
MEASURE: Shall the measure to authorize City of
Ontario Community Facilities District No. 76 (Compass Pointe) (the “Community Facilities District”) to incur bonded
indebtedness in a maximum amount of $60,000,000, to
authorize the Community Facilities District to levy a special tax in order to finance certain facilities and services and to establish the annual appropriations limit of the Community Facilities District at $60,000,000, as specified in the resolutions adopted by the City Council of the City of Ontario on November 4, 2025 entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Ontario, California, of Formation of City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 76 (Compass Pointe), Proposing that the Community Facilities District Be Authorized to Levy a Special Tax and Proposing that an Appropriations Limit of the Community Facilities District Be Established” and “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Ontario, California, Deeming it Necessary for City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 76 (Compass Pointe) to Incur Bonded Indebtedness,” be adopted?
Yes:
No:
3579
RESOLUTION NO. _____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO,
CALIFORNIA, DECLARING RESULTS OF SPECIAL ELECTION AND
DIRECTING RECORDING OF NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN.
WHEREAS, on November 4, 2025, the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of Ontario (the “City”), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the “Act”), adopted a resolution entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Ontario, California, Calling Special Election for City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 76 (Compass Pointe)” (the “Resolution Calling Election”), calling a special election to submit to the qualified electors of City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 76 (Compass Pointe) (the “Community Facilities District”) the combined ballot proposition to authorize the Community Facilities District to incur bonded indebtedness, to authorize the Community Facilities District to levy a special tax and to establish the appropriations limit of the Community Facilities District; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the Resolution Calling Election and the provisions of the Act, the special election was held on November 4, 2025; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk of the City (the “City Clerk”) has certified the canvass of the returns of the election and has filed a Canvass and Statement of Results of Election (the “Canvass”), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Ontario as follows:
SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct, and the City Council so finds and determines.
SECTION 2. The City Council has received, reviewed and hereby accepts the Canvass.
SECTION 3. The City Council hereby finds and declares that the ballot proposition submitted to the qualified electors of the Community Facilities District pursuant to the Resolution Calling Election has been passed and approved by such electors in accordance with Section 53355, Section 53328 and Section 53325.7 of the Act.
SECTION 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to execute and cause to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino a notice of special tax lien in the form required by the Act, said recording to occur no later than 15 days following adoption by the City Council of this Resolution.
SECTION 5. All actions heretofore taken by the officers, employees and agents of the City with respect to the special election, or in connection with or related to any of the matters referred to herein, are hereby approved, confirmed and ratified. 3580
SECTION 6. The officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions and do all things that they, or any of them, may deem necessary or desirable to accomplish the purposes of this Resolution and not inconsistent with the provisions hereof.
SECTION 7. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
The City Clerk of the City of Ontario shall certify as to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 4
th day of November 2025.
_____________________________________
PAUL S. LEON, MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________________
SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________________
BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
CITY ATTORNEY
3581
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
CITY OF ONTARIO )
I, SHEILA MAUTZ, City Clerk of the City of Ontario, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that foregoing Resolution No. 2025- was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Ontario at their regular meeting held November 4, 2025 by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
____________________________________
SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
The foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 2025- duly passed and adopted by the Ontario City Council at their regular meeting held November 4, 2025. _____________________________________
SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
3582
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF ONTARIO
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 76
(COMPASS POINTE)
CANVASS AND STATEMENT OF RESULTS OF ELECTION
I hereby certify that on November 4, 2025, I canvassed the returns of the special election for City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 76 (Compass Pointe) held on November 4, 2025, that the total number of ballots cast in said Community Facilities District and the total number of votes cast for and against the combined ballot proposition submitted to the qualified electors of the Community Facilities District are as follows and that the totals as shown for and against such proposition are true and correct:
Qualified
Landowner
Votes
Votes
Cast YES NO
City of Ontario Community Facilities
District No. 76 (Compass Pointe)
Special Election, November 4, 2025
52 ___ ___ ___
MEASURE: Shall the measure to authorize City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 76 (Compass Pointe) (the “Community Facilities District”) to incur bonded indebtedness in a maximum amount of $60,000,000, to authorize the Community Facilities District to levy a special tax in order to finance certain facilities and services and to establish the annual appropriations limit of the Community Facilities District at $60,000,000, as specified in the resolutions adopted by the City Council of the City of Ontario on November 4, 2025 entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Ontario, California, of Formation of City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 76 (Compass Pointe), Proposing that the Community Facilities District Be Authorized to Levy a Special Tax and Proposing that an Appropriations Limit of the Community Facilities District Be Established” and “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Ontario, California, Deeming it Necessary for City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 76 (Compass Pointe) to Incur Bonded Indebtedness,” be adopted? IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I HAVE HEREUNTO SET MY HAND this 4th day of November, 2025.
BY:
SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
3583
ORDINANCE NO. _____
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO,
CALIFORNIA, LEVYING A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN CITY OF ONTARIO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 76 (COMPASS POINTE).
WHEREAS, on September 16, 2025, the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of Ontario (the “City”), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the “Act”), adopted a resolution entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Ontario, California, of Intention to Establish a Community Facilities District Proposed to be Named City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 76 (Compass Pointe) and to Authorize the Levy of a Special Tax Therein,” stating its intention to establish City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 76 (Compass Pointe) (the “Community Facilities District”) and to authorize the Community Facilities District to levy a special tax (the “Special Tax”) within the Community Facilities District for the purpose of financing certain public facilities (the “Facilities”) and services (the “Services”); and WHEREAS, on November 4, 2025, the City Council held a noticed public hearing on the establishment of the Community Facilities District, as required by the Act; and WHEREAS, subsequent to the close of said hearing, the City Council adopted resolutions entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Ontario, California, of Formation of City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 76 (Compass Pointe), Proposing that the Community Facilities District be Authorized to Levy a Special Tax and Proposing that an Appropriations Limit of the Community Facilities District be Established” (the “Resolution of Formation”), “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Ontario, California, Deeming it Necessary for City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 76 (Compass Pointe) to Incur Bonded Indebtedness” and “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Ontario, California, Calling Special Election for City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 76 (Compass Pointe),” which resolutions established the Community Facilities District, proposed that the Community Facilities District be authorized to levy the Special Tax within the Community Facilities District, proposed that an appropriations limit of the Community Facilities District be established and called a special election to submit to the qualified electors of the Community Facilities District the combined ballot proposition to authorize the Community Facilities District to incur bonded indebtedness, to authorize the Community Facilities District to levy the Special Tax and to establish the appropriations limit of the Community Facilities District; and WHEREAS, on November 4, 2025, an election was held in which the qualified electors of the Community Facilities District approved said proposition by more than the two-thirds vote required by the Act; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is the legislative body of the Community Facilities District.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
3584
SECTION 1. The City Council hereby authorizes and levies the Special Tax within the Community Facilities District pursuant to Sections 53328 and 53340 of the Act, at the rate and in accordance with the method of apportionment set forth in Exhibit B to the Resolution of Formation (the “Rate and Method”). The Special Tax is hereby levied commencing in fiscal year 2026-27 and in each fiscal year thereafter until the last fiscal year in which the Special Tax is authorized to be levied pursuant to the Rate and Method.
SECTION 2. The City Council may, pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 53340 of the Act, provide, by resolution, for the levy of the Special Tax in the current tax year or in future tax years at the same rate or at a lower rate than the rate provided by this Ordinance.
In no event shall the Special Tax be levied on any parcel within the Community Facilities District in excess of the maximum tax specified therefor in the Rate and Method.
SECTION 3. The Special Tax shall be levied on all of the parcels in the Community Facilities District, unless exempted by law or by the Rate and Method.
SECTION 4. The proceeds of the Special Tax shall only be used to pay, in whole or in part, the cost of providing the Facilities and Services and incidental expenses pursuant to the Act.
SECTION 5. The Special Tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected and shall be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure, sale and lien priority in the case of delinquency as is provided for ad valorem taxes or in such other manner as the City Council shall determine, including direct billing of the affected property owners.
SECTION 6. If for any reason any portion of this Ordinance is found to be invalid, or if the Special Tax is found inapplicable to any particular parcel within the Community Facilities District by a court of competent jurisdiction, the balance of this Ordinance and the application of the Special Tax to the remaining parcels within the Community Facilities District shall not be affected.
SECTION 7. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption and shall cause a summary thereof to be published at least once, in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Ontario, California within fifteen (15) days of the adoption. The City Clerk shall post a certified copy of this ordinance, including the vote for and against the same, in the Office of the City Clerk, in accordance with Government Code Section 36933.
The City Clerk of the City of Ontario shall certify as to the adoption of this Ordinance.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this ________ day of _________ 2025. _____________________________________
PAUL S. LEON, MAYOR
3585
ATTEST:
_________________________________
SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
CITY ATTORNEY
3586
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
CITY OF ONTARIO )
I, SHEILA MAUTZ, City Clerk of the City of Ontario, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that foregoing Ordinance No. _______ was duly introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Ontario held November 4, 2025 and adopted at the regular meeting held ___________, 2025 by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
_________________________________
SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
I hereby certify that the foregoing is the original of Ordinance No. _______ duly passed and adopted by the Ontario City Council at their regular meeting held ____________ and that Summaries of the Ordinance were published on ___________ and _____________, in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper.
__________________________________
SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
3587
RESOLUTION NO. _______
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF AN
ACQUISITION AND FUNDING AGREEMENT WITH KB HOME CAL
MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC.
WHEREAS, certain real property within the boundaries of the City of Ontario (the “City”) located generally south of State Route 60 is commonly referred to as Ontario Ranch; and
WHEREAS, the City has approved a General Plan Amendment for the New Model Colony (the name by which Ontario Ranch was formerly known), which has been supplemented by certain water, recycled water and sewer master plans (as so supplemented, the “General Plan Amendment”) and has certified an Environmental Impact Report and adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration in connection with the General Plan Amendment (together, the “Environmental Impact Report”); and WHEREAS, the City has specified in the General Plan Amendment and the Environmental Impact Report the major backbone transportation, water, sewer, storm drainage, parks, public safety infrastructure and fiber optic systems required to serve Ontario Ranch; and
WHEREAS, KB HOME Cal Management Services LLC (“KB HOME”), is developing certain of the property within Ontario Ranch (the “Property”); and WHEREAS, certain of such major backbone infrastructure is required to serve the Property; and
WHEREAS, in order to provide a mechanism to fund, in a timely manner, the costs of certain of such major backbone infrastructure required to serve Ontario Ranch (the “Facilities”) so that such development may occur, the City has, pursuant to the provisions of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the “Act”), established City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 76 (Compass Pointe) (the “Community Facilities District”), the boundaries of which include the Property; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, the proceedings of the City Council of the City and an election held within the Community Facilities District, the Community Facilities District is authorized to levy a special tax (the “Special Tax”) within the Community Facilities District and issue special tax bonds (the “Bonds”) secured by the Special Tax in order to finance certain of the Facilities; and
WHEREAS, it is anticipated that the Special Tax will be levied by the Community Facilities District and that, from time to time, Bonds will be issued by the Community Facilities District; and
3588
WHEREAS, KB HOME proposes to construct, or cause to be constructed, certain of the Facilities proposed to be financed by the Community Facilities District pursuant to the Act, and the City proposes to purchase such Facilities from KB HOME pursuant to an Acquisition and Funding Agreement by and between the City and KB HOME (such Acquisition and Funding Agreement, in the form presented to this meeting, with such changes, insertions and omissions as are made pursuant to this Resolution, being referred to herein as the “Acquisition Agreement”); and WHEREAS, the City Council is the legislative body of the Community Facilities District.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Ontario as follows:
SECTION 1. The Acquisition Agreement, in substantially the form submitted to this meeting and made a part hereof as though set forth herein, be and the same is hereby approved. Each of the Mayor of the City, and such other member of the City Council as the Mayor may designate, the City Manager of the City and the Executive Director of Finance of the City, and such other officer or employee of the City as the City Manager may designate (the “Authorized Officers”) is hereby authorized, and any one of the Authorized Officers is hereby directed, for and in the name of the City, to execute and deliver the Acquisition Agreement in the form submitted to this meeting, with such changes, insertions and omissions as the Authorized Officer executing the same may require or approve, such requirement or approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution of the Acquisition Agreement by such Authorized Officer.
SECTION 2. All actions heretofore taken by the officers, employees and agents of the City with respect to the Acquisition Agreement, or in connection with or related to any of the matters referred to herein, are hereby approved, confirmed and ratified.
SECTION 3. The officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions and do all things that they, or any of them, may deem necessary or desirable to accomplish the purposes of this Resolution and not inconsistent with the provisions hereof.
SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
The City Clerk of the City of Ontario shall certify as to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 4th day of November 2025. _____________________________________
PAUL S. LEON, MAYOR
3589
ATTEST:
____________________________________
SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________________
BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
CITY ATTORNEY
3590
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
CITY OF ONTARIO )
I, SHEILA MAUTZ, City Clerk of the City of Ontario, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that foregoing Resolution No. 2025- was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Ontario at their regular meeting held November 4, 2025 by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
____________________________________
SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
The foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 2025- duly passed and adopted by the Ontario City Council at their regular meeting held November 4, 2025. _____________________________________
SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
3591
4147-2738-0063.1
RESOLUTION NO. ______
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO,
CALIFORNIA, MAKING A DECLARATION OF OFFICIAL INTENT TO
REIMBURSE EXPENDITURES FOR COSTS OF FACILITIES WITH BOND PROCEEDS AND RELATED ACTIONS.
WHEREAS, the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of Ontario (the “City”) has formed City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 76 (Compass Pointe) (the “Community Facilities District”) under the provisions of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the “Act”); and
WHEREAS, the Community Facilities District is authorized under the Act to levy a special tax (the “Special Tax”) to pay for the costs of certain public facilities (the “Facilities”) and to issue bonds payable from the Special Tax; and WHEREAS, in order to provide funds to finance certain of the Facilities, the Community Facilities District proposes to issue its City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 76 (Compass Pointe) Special Tax Bonds (the “Bonds”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act (a) the Community Facilities District is a legally constituted governmental entity established pursuant to the Act for the sole purpose of financing facilities and services, and (b) the City Council is the legislative body of the Community Facilities District; and
WHEREAS, the Community Facilities District and the City are related entities; and WHEREAS, beginning on the 60-day period prior to the date hereof, the City has paid or incurred, or expects to pay or incur prior to the issuance of the Bonds, certain costs of the Facilities; and
WHEREAS, the City has also paid or incurred certain “preliminary expenditures” with respect to the Facilities and may pay or incur certain additional “preliminary expenditures” with respect to the Facilities; the term “preliminary expenditures” includes architectural, engineering, surveying, soil testing, bond issuance, and similar costs that are incurred prior to commencement of acquisition, construction, or rehabilitation of a project, other than land acquisition, site preparation, and similar costs incident to commencement of construction and such preliminary expenditures constitute costs of the Facilities; and
WHEREAS, in order to reimburse the City for the payment of costs of the Facilities, the Community Facilities District anticipates it will issue Bonds in an amount not expected to exceed $60,000,000 for the purpose of financing costs of the Facilities; and WHEREAS, proceeds of the Bonds will be allocated to reimbursement of prior expenditures no later than 18 months after the later of (a) the date the cost is paid, or (b) the date the Facilities are, or each component thereof is, placed in service or abandoned (but in no event more than three years after the cost is paid); and 3592
WHEREAS, Section 1.150-2 of the Treasury Regulations requires the Community Facilities District to declare its reasonable official intent to reimburse prior expenditures for costs of the Facilities with proceeds of indebtedness; and WHEREAS, the Community Facilities District desires to declare its official intent to use proceeds of indebtedness, including the Bonds, to reimburse expenditures for costs of the Facilities paid before such indebtedness is incurred and to finance the costs of the Facilities on a long-term basis with the proceeds of such indebtedness; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Ontario as follows:
SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct, and the City Council so finds and determines.
SECTION 2. This Resolution is adopted by the City Council, as the legislative body of the Community Facilities District, solely for purposes of establishing compliance with the requirements of Section 1.150-2 of the Treasury Regulations. Capitalized undefined terms used herein shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and in Section 1.150-2 of the Treasury Regulations. This Resolution does not bind the Community Facilities District or the City to make any expenditure, incur any indebtedness, or proceed with construction of the Facilities.
SECTION 3. All actions heretofore taken by the officers, employees and agents of the City with respect to the actions set forth above are hereby approved, confirmed and ratified.
SECTION 4. The officers, employees and agents of the City are, and each of them is, hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name of the Community Facilities District to take all actions and do any and all things and to execute and deliver any and all agreements, documents, certificates or instruments that they, or any of them, may deem necessary or advisable in order to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Resolution and otherwise to carry out, give effect to and comply with the terms and intent of this Resolution not inconsistent with the provisions hereof.
SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
The City Clerk of the City of Ontario shall certify as to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 4
th day of November 2025.
_____________________________________
PAUL S. LEON, MAYOR
3593
ATTEST:
____________________________________
SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________________
BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
CITY ATTORNEY
3594
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
CITY OF ONTARIO )
I, SHEILA MAUTZ, City Clerk of the City of Ontario, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that foregoing Resolution No. 2025- was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Ontario at their regular meeting held November 4, 2025 by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
____________________________________
SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
The foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 2025- duly passed and adopted by the Ontario City Council at their regular meeting held November 4, 2025. _____________________________________
SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
3595
4158-0112-1887.2
ACQUISITION AND FUNDING AGREEMENT
by and between
CITY OF ONTARIO
and
KB HOME CAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC
Dated as of November 1, 2025
City of Ontario
Community Facilities District No. 76
(Compass Pointe)
3596
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
i
4158-0112-1887.2
ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................. 3 Section 1.1. Definitions............................................................................................ 3 Section 1.2. Rules of Construction .......................................................................... 7 ARTICLE II ACQUISITION OF FACILITIES ................................................................... 9 Section 2.1. Acquisition of Facilities; Limited Source of Payments ....................... 9 Section 2.2. Segment Review; Payment Requests ................................................... 9 Section 2.3. Payment of Purchase Price................................................................. 11 ARTICLE III CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES ............................................................ 12 Section 3.1. Preparation and Approval of Plans and Specifications ...................... 12 Section 3.2. Duty of the Developer to Construct ................................................... 12 Section 3.3. Public Works Requirements .............................................................. 12 Section 3.4. Bonding Requirements....................................................................... 14 Section 3.5. Inspection; Completion of Construction ............................................ 14 Section 3.6. Maintenance of Facilities; Warranties ............................................... 14 Section 3.7. Insurance Requirements ..................................................................... 14 Section 3.8. Ownership of Facilities ...................................................................... 16 ARTICLE IV REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES AND COVENANTS;
INDEMNIFICATION.................................................................................... 17 Section 4.1. Representations and Warranties of the Developer ............................. 17 Section 4.2. Covenants of the Developer ............................................................... 18 Section 4.3. Covenants of the City......................................................................... 19 Section 4.4. Indemnification .................................................................................. 19 ARTICLE V EVENTS OF DEFAULT AND REMEDIES; FORCE MAJEURE .............. 21 Section 5.1. Developer Events of Default .............................................................. 21 Section 5.2. Remedies for Developer Events of Default ....................................... 22 Section 5.3. City Events of Default ....................................................................... 23 Section 5.4. Remedies for City Events of Default ................................................. 23 Section 5.5. Force Majeure .................................................................................... 24 ARTICLE VI MISCELLANEOUS ...................................................................................... 26 Section 6.1. Developer as Independent Contractor ................................................ 26 3597
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(continued)
Page
ii
4158-0112-1887.2
Section 6.2. Other Agreements .............................................................................. 26 Section 6.3. Binding on Successors and Assigns ................................................... 26 Section 6.4. Amendments ...................................................................................... 26 Section 6.5. Waivers .............................................................................................. 26 Section 6.6. Third-Party Beneficiaries ................................................................... 26 Section 6.7. Notices ............................................................................................... 27 Section 6.8. Attorneys’ Fees .................................................................................. 27 Section 6.9. Severability ........................................................................................ 27 Section 6.10. Governing Law .................................................................................. 27 Section 6.11. Jurisdiction and Venue ....................................................................... 27 Section 6.12. Electronic Signature ........................................................................... 28 Section 6.13. Counterparts ....................................................................................... 28 Section 6.14. Effective Date .................................................................................... 28 EXHIBIT A FACILITIES ................................................................................................ A-1 EXHIBIT B FORM OF PAYMENT REQUEST ............................................................. B-1 3598
4158-0112-1887.2
ACQUISITION AND FUNDING AGREEMENT
THIS ACQUISITION AND FUNDING AGREEMENT (this “Acquisition Agreement”), dated as of November 1, 2025, is by and between the CITY OF ONTARIO, a general law city organized and existing under the laws of the State of California (the “City”), and KB HOME CAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC, a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware (the “Developer”).
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, certain real property within the boundaries of the City located generally south of State Route 60 is commonly referred to as Ontario Ranch; WHEREAS, such real property was previously known as the New Model Colony; WHEREAS, the City has approved a General Plan Amendment for the New Model Colony, which has been supplemented by certain water, recycled water and sewer master plans (as so supplemented, the “General Plan Amendment”) and has certified an Environmental Impact Report and adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration in connection with the General Plan Amendment (together, the “Environmental Impact Report”); WHEREAS, the City has specified in the General Plan Amendment and the Environmental Impact Report the major backbone transportation, water, sewer, storm drainage, parks, public safety infrastructure and fiber optic systems required to serve Ontario Ranch; WHEREAS, the Developer is developing certain of the property within Ontario Ranch (the “Property”);
WHEREAS, certain of such major backbone infrastructure is required to serve the Property;
WHEREAS, in order to provide a mechanism to fund, in a timely manner, the costs of certain of such major backbone infrastructure required to serve Ontario Ranch (the “Facilities”) so that such development may occur;
WHEREAS, in order to provide such a mechanism, the City has, pursuant to the provisions of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the “Act”), established City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 76 (Compass Pointe) (the “Community Facilities District”), the boundaries of which include the Property; WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, the proceedings of the City Council of the City and an election held within the Community Facilities District, the Community Facilities District is authorized to levy a special tax (the “Special Tax”) within the Community Facilities District and issue special tax bonds (the “Bonds”) secured by the Special Tax in order to finance certain of the Facilities;
3599
2 4158-0112-1887.2
WHEREAS, it is anticipated that the Special Tax will be levied by the Community Facilities District and that, from time to time, Bonds will be issued by the Community Facilities District;
WHEREAS, it is anticipated that, in accordance with the terms set forth in this Acquisition Agreement, the Developer will construct or cause to be constructed certain of the Facilities, that, upon satisfaction of the conditions specified herein, the City will acquire such Facilities and take title thereto and that the Developer will be paid the purchase price thereof, determined as set forth herein, from certain proceeds of the Special Tax, if any, and certain proceeds of the Bonds;
WHEREAS, Section 53313.5 of the Act provides that a community facilities district may only finance the purchase of facilities whose construction has been completed, as determined by the legislative body, before the resolution of formation to establish the community facilities district is adopted pursuant to Section 53325.1 of the Act, except that a community facilities district may finance the purchase of facilities completed after the adoption of the resolution of formation if the facility was constructed as if it had been constructed under the direction and supervision, or under the authority of, the local agency; and WHEREAS, the Facilities are to be acquired by the City pursuant to this Acquisition Agreement pursuant to the Act and, specifically, pursuant to the provisions of Sections 53313.5 thereof;
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:
3600
3 4158-0112-1887.2
ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS
Section 1.1. Definitions. Unless the context otherwise requires (a) the terms defined in this Section shall, for all purposes of this Acquisition Agreement, have the meanings herein ascribed thereto, and (b) capitalized undefined terms used herein that are defined in the Indenture shall have the respective meanings ascribed thereto in the Indenture. “Acceptable Title” means title to land, or an easement therein, delivered free and clear of all liens, taxes, assessments, leases, easements and encumbrances, whether any such item is recorded or unrecorded, except those non-monetary items that are reasonably determined by the City not to interfere with the intended use of such land or easement and therefore are not required to be cleared from title.
“Acceptance Date” means (a) with respect to a Segment, the date on which such Segment is accepted by the City pursuant to Section 2.2(e) hereof, and (b) with respect to a Component, the date on which the last Segment that is part of such Component is accepted by the City pursuant to Section 2.2(e) hereof.
“Acquisition Agreement” means this Acquisition and Funding Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2025, by and between the City and the Developer, as originally executed or as the same may be amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time in accordance with its terms.
“Act” means the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, constituting Section 53311 et seq. of the California Government Code.
“Actual Cost” means, with respect to a Segment, as the description thereof is reflected in the then current Plans therefor, an amount equal to the sum of (a) the Developer’s actual, reasonable cost of constructing such Segment (including grading for such construction), including labor, material and equipment costs and professional services directly related to materials testing, (b) the Developer’s actual, reasonable cost of designing and preparing the Plans for such Segment, including engineering services provided in connection with designing and preparing such Plans, (c) the Developer’s actual, reasonable cost of any performance and maintenance bonds and insurance, including title insurance, required hereby for such Segment, (d) the Developer’s actual, reasonable cost of any real property or interest therein, other than any such real property or interest therein to be conveyed with a Circulation System Segment, which real property or interest therein is either necessary for the construction of such Segment (e.g., temporary construction easements, haul roads, etc.) or is required to be conveyed with such Segment in order to convey Acceptable Title thereto to the City or its designee, (e) the Developer’s actual, reasonable cost of environmental evaluations required in the City’s reasonable determination specifically for such Segment, (f) the amount of any fees actually paid by the Developer to governmental agencies in order to obtain permits, licenses or other necessary governmental approvals and reviews for such Segment, including City plan check, processing and inspection fees for such Segment, (g) the Developer’s actual, reasonable cost for construction management services for such Segment, which cost shall not exceed 5% of the cost 3601
4 4158-0112-1887.2
of constructing such Segment, as determined pursuant to clause (a) of this definition, and (h) the Developer’s actual, reasonable cost for professional services directly related to the construction of such Segment, including engineering, inspection, construction staking and similar professional services, all as specified in a Payment Request that has been reviewed and approved by the City Engineer; provided, however, that (i) no item of cost relating to a Segment shall be included in more than one category of cost specified in clauses (a) through (h) of this definition, (ii) except with respect to items of cost for construction management services specified in clause (g) that are provided by the Developer or an Affiliate thereof rather than a third party, each item of cost shall include only amounts actually paid by the Developer to third parties, other than Affiliates of the Developer, and shall not include overhead or other internal expenses of the Developer, and (iii) the aggregate cost of items specified in clauses (e) through (h) shall not exceed 30% of the cost of constructing such Segment, as determined pursuant to clause (a) of this definition. “Affiliate” of another Person means (a) each Person that, directly or indirectly, owns or controls, whether beneficially or as trustee, guardian, or other fiduciary, 50% or more of any class of equity securities of such other Person, and (b) each Person that controls, is controlled by or is under common control with or by such Person or any Affiliate of such Person. For the purpose of this definition, “control” of a Person shall mean the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of its management or policies, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract or otherwise. “Bonds” means bonds, notes or other obligations of the Community Facilities District payable from the Special Tax and issued under the Indenture. “Circulation System Segments” means Segment Nos. ST-1 through ST-8 inclusive. “City” means the City of Ontario, a general law city organized and existing under the laws of the State, and its successors.
“City Council” means the City Council of the City.
“City Engineer” means the City Engineer of the City.
“City Event of Default” means any event or circumstance specified in Section 5.3 hereof.
“Community Facilities District” means City of Ontario Community Facilities District No. 76 (Compass Pointe), a community facilities district organized and existing under the laws of the State, and its successors.
“Complete” means, with respect to a Segment, that the construction of such Segment (including all ancillary, non-essential items included in such Segment) by the Developer is, in the reasonable judgment of the City Engineer, in all respects complete. “Components” means the related groups of Segments identified as such and described in Exhibit A hereto; each Component is comprised of the Segments listed thereunder in Exhibit A. 3602
5 4158-0112-1887.2
“Conditions of Approval” means, with respect to any portion of the Property, the conditions of approval of all land use entitlements approved by the City for such portion of the Property and the conditions of any Development Agreement, subdivision improvement agreement or other agreement between the Developer and the City relating to such portion of the Property, which conditions the Developer must satisfy or cause to be satisfied in order to develop such portion of the Property.
“Construction Agreement” means the First Amended and Restated Agreement for Financing and Construction of Limited Infrastructure Improvements to Serve an Easterly Portion of the New Model Colony, made as of August 21, 2012, by and between the City and NMC Builders, as originally executed and as it may be amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time in accordance with its terms.
“Developer” means KB HOME Cal Management Services LLC, a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, and its successors and assigns.
“Developer Acquisition Account” means (a) prior to the initial issuance of Bonds, the fund or account established for the Community Facilities District by the City, howsoever denominated, into which the Net Proceeds of the Special Tax are to be deposited, and (b) from and after the initial issuance of Bonds, the account by that name within the Improvement Fund established and held by the Trustee pursuant to the Indenture, into which the Net Proceeds of Bonds available to pay the Purchase Prices of the Segments purchased by the City pursuant hereto are to be deposited.
“Developer Event of Default” means any event or circumstance specified in Section 5.1 hereof.
“Developer Representative” means the person or persons designated as such in a certificate signed by the Developer and delivered to the City, which certificate shall contain an original or specimen signature of each person so designated. “Development Agreement” means a statutory development agreement between the City and the Developer, entered into pursuant to California Government Code Section 65864 et seq., relating to the development of a portion of the Property. “DIF Program Costs” has the meaning ascribed thereto in the definition of “Program Costs” or “DIF Program Costs” in the Construction Agreement. “Effective Date” means November 4, 2025.
“Facilities” means the facilities described in Exhibit A hereto. “General Prevailing Wage Rates” means those rates as determined by the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California. “Hazardous Material” means any hazardous or toxic substance, material or waste that is regulated by any local governmental authority, the State or the United States Government, 3603
6 4158-0112-1887.2
including any material or substance that is (a) designated as a “hazardous substance” pursuant to Section 311 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. (33 U.S.C. § 1321), (b) defined as a “hazardous waste” pursuant to Section 1004 of the Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. § 6901 et seq. (42 U.S.C. § 6903), (c) defined as a “hazardous substance” pursuant to Section 101 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq., (d) petroleum, or (e) asbestos.
“Improvement Fund” means the fund or account established under the Indenture, howsoever denominated, into the accounts established within which the Net Proceeds of Bonds are to be deposited.
“Indenture” means the indenture, trust agreement, fiscal agent agreement or similar instrument, howsoever denominated, pursuant to which Bonds of the Community Facilities District are issued, as originally executed and as it may be amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time in accordance with its terms. “Member” means a member of NMC Builders.
“Memorandum of Agreement” means the Amended and Restated Memorandum of Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2022, by and between the City and NMC Builders, as originally executed and as it may be amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time in accordance with its terms.
“Net Proceeds” means (a) the proceeds, if any, of the Special Tax received prior to the initial issuance of Bonds and remaining after the payment or setting aside of, or provision for, administrative expenses of the Community Facilities District, and (b) the proceeds of Bonds remaining after the payment or setting aside of, or provision for (i) the underwriter’s discount for such Bonds, (ii) the costs of issuance of such Bonds, including the costs of formation of the Community Facilities District, (iii) any required reserve fund deposit for such Bonds, (iv) capitalized interest on such Bonds, and (v) pre-funded administrative expenses of the Community Facilities District.
“NMC Acquisition Account” means the account by that name within the Improvement Fund established and held by the Trustee pursuant to the Indenture. “NMC Builders” means NMC Builders, LLC, a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of the State of California, and its successors and assigns. “Payment Request” means the document to be provided by the Developer to substantiate the Purchase Price of one or more Segments, which shall be substantially in the form of Exhibit B attached hereto.
“Person” means an individual, a corporation, a partnership, an association, a limited liability company, a joint stock company, a trust, any unincorporated organization or a government or political subdivision thereof.
3604
7 4158-0112-1887.2
“Plans” means the plans and specifications for the Facilities prepared or to be prepared by or on behalf of the Developer pursuant to Section 3.1 hereof. “Property” means the real property located within the boundaries of the Community Facilities District.
“Purchase Price” means, with respect to a Segment, subject to the provisions of Section 2.3 hereof, the Actual Cost of such Segment.
“Rate and Method” means the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Tax approved by the qualified electors of the Community Facilities District. “Related Property” means, with respect to a Segment, the property on, in or over which such Segment is located, which property, or an easement thereon or other interest therein, is dedicated or otherwise conveyed to the City as provided in Section 2.2(d) hereof. “Segments” means the discrete portions of the Components identified as such and described in Exhibit A hereto as Segments; provided, however, that each such Segment described therein shall constitute a Segment for purposes of this Acquisition Agreement only if such Segment was constructed by or on behalf of the Developer singly and not jointly or in conjunction with another Member or NMC Builders.
“Special Tax” means the special tax approved by the qualified electors of the Community Facilities District to be levied therein.
“State” means the State of California.
“Substantially Complete” means, with respect to a Circulation System Segment, that the construction of such Circulation System Segment by the Developer has, in the reasonable judgment of the City Engineer, reached a stage of completion sufficient to allow such Circulation System Segment to be utilized for the purpose for which it is intended and that only the construction of ancillary, non-essential items remains incomplete; provided, however, that a Circulation System Segment shall not be deemed to be Substantially Complete if, in the reasonable judgment of the City Engineer, the cost to complete the construction of such ancillary, non-essential items would exceed 15% of the Purchase Price of such Circulation System Segment.
“Trustee” means the commercial bank or trust company initially designated as trustee under the Indenture, and any successor thereto thereunder substituted in its place as provided therein.
Section 1.2. Rules of Construction. (a) The terms defined herein expressed in the singular shall, unless the context otherwise indicates, include the plural and vice versa. (b) The use herein of the masculine, feminine or neuter gender is for convenience only and shall be deemed and construed to include correlative words of the masculine, feminine or neuter gender, as appropriate.
3605
8 4158-0112-1887.2
(c) References herein to a document shall include all amendments, supplements or other modifications to such document, and any replacements, substitutions or novation of, that document.
(d) Any term defined herein by reference to another document shall continue to have the meaning ascribed thereto whether or not such other document remains in effect. (e) The use herein of the words “including” and “includes,” and words of similar import, shall be deemed to be followed by the phrase “without limitation.” (f) Headings of Articles and Sections herein and the table of contents hereof are solely for convenience of reference, do not constitute a part hereof and shall not affect the meaning, construction or effect hereof.
(g) All references herein to designated “Articles,” “Sections,” “Exhibits,” “subsections,” “paragraphs,” “clauses,” and other subdivisions are to the designated Articles, Sections, Exhibits, subsections, paragraphs, clauses, and other subdivisions of this Acquisition Agreement.
(h) The words “hereof” (except when preceded by a specific Section or Article reference) “herein,” “hereby,” “hereunder,” “hereinabove,” “hereinafter,” and other equivalent words and phrases used herein refer to this Acquisition Agreement and not solely to the particular portion hereof in which any such word is used. (i) Any reference to a Person, or a Person in a specified capacity, shall be construed to include such Person’s successors or such Person’s successors in such capacity, as the case may be.
3606
9 4158-0112-1887.2
ARTICLE II
ACQUISITION OF FACILITIES
Section 2.1. Acquisition of Facilities; Limited Source of Payments. (a) Subject to the terms and conditions hereof, the Developer hereby agrees to sell to the City, and the City hereby agrees to purchase from the Developer, each Segment for the Purchase Price thereof. (b) The Purchase Prices of Segments are to be paid from Net Proceeds of the Special Tax, if any, and Net Proceeds of Bonds deposited in the Developer Acquisition Account.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, the City shall not be obligated to pay the Purchase Price of any Segment except from the Net Proceeds of the Special Tax and the Net Proceeds of the Bonds so deposited in the Developer Acquisition Account. The City makes no warranty, either express or implied, that the Community Facilities District will be able to issue and sell any Bonds or that the Net Proceeds of the Special Tax and the Net Proceeds of the Bonds so deposited in the Developer Acquisition Account and available for the payment of the Purchase Price of the Segments will be sufficient for such purpose. (c) The Net Proceeds of the Special Tax and the Net Proceeds of the Bonds shall be applied to the uses in the priorities set forth in the Memorandum of Agreement. If amounts remain in the Developer Acquisition Account after the Purchase Price of each of the Segments has been paid, such remaining amounts shall be applied in accordance with the priorities set forth in the Memorandum of Agreement.
Section 2.2. Segment Review; Payment Requests. (a) When the Developer has concluded that the construction of a Segment by the Developer is in all respects complete, the Developer shall deliver to the City Engineer (i) a Payment Request for such Segment, together with all attachments and exhibits to be included therewith, (ii) a copy of the documents conveying, or that previously conveyed, to the City Acceptable Title to the Related Property of such Segment, as described in subsection (d) of this Section, and (iii) a copy of the Notice of Completion of such Segment that will be filed in accordance with Section 3093 of the California Civil Code, if applicable; provided, however, that, if, during the process of designing a Segment, obtaining bids for construction of a Segment or during construction of a Segment, the Developer determines that, because of changed conditions or circumstances, the actual cost of constructing such Segment may materially exceed the Developer’s originally estimated cost thereof, the Developer shall, in order to facilitate and expedite the City Engineer’s review and verification with respect to such Segment pursuant to subsection (b) of this Section, as soon as practicable, deliver to the City Engineer a written statement describing (i) such changed conditions or circumstances, (ii) the Developer’s original estimated cost of constructing such Segment, (iii) the anticipated effect of such changed conditions or circumstances on the Actual Cost of such Segment, and (iv) an explanation as to why including the increased cost resulting from such changed conditions or circumstances would result in the Actual Cost of such Segment being no greater than the actual, reasonable cost thereof, determined in accordance with the provisions of the definition of Actual Cost set forth herein.
(b) Upon receipt of a completed Payment Request (and accompanying documentation) for a Segment, the City Engineer shall conduct a review in order to confirm that 3607
10 4158-0112-1887.2
such Segment is Complete and was constructed in accordance with the Plans therefor and to verify and approve the Actual Cost of such Segment specified in such Payment Request. As a reference in determining the reasonable cost of constructing such Segment, the City Engineer may use the most recently updated DIF Program Costs of such Segment, which reflect the City Engineer’s determination, as of the date of such update, of the reasonable cost of constructing such Segment, recognizing that, depending on the date of such most recent update, such DIF Program Costs may not reflect the reasonable cost of constructing such Segment at the time it was constructed. The Developer agrees to cooperate with the City Engineer in conducting each such review and to provide the City Engineer with such additional information and documentation as is reasonably necessary for the City Engineer to conclude each such review.
The City agrees to cause the City Engineer to conduct such review without unreasonable delay.
If the City Engineer determines that the Actual Cost specified in such Payment Request as initially submitted exceeds the Developer’s actual, reasonable cost of constructing such Segment, the Developer shall resubmit such Payment Request, with the Actual Cost specified therein modified so as to take into account such determination by the City Engineer. Upon confirmation that such Segment is Complete and has been constructed in accordance with the Plans therefor, and verification and approval of the Actual Cost of such Segment, the City Engineer shall sign the Payment Request, indicating thereon that such Segment is Complete and that the full amount of the Purchase Price of such Segment is eligible for payment, and forward the same to the City. (c) With respect to a Circulation System Segment, if, as a result of the review described in subsection (b) of this Section, the City Engineer (i) determines that such Circulation System Segment, while not Complete, is Substantially Complete, (ii) confirms that such Circulation System Segment has been constructed in accordance with the Plans therefor, and (iii) verifies and approves the Actual Cost of such Circulation System Segment, the City Engineer shall sign the Payment Request, indicating thereon that such Circulation System Segment is Substantially Complete and that an amount equal to 85% of the Actual Cost of such Circulation System Segment is eligible for payment, and forward the same to the City.
When the Developer completes or causes to be completed all work with respect to such Circulation System Segment and concludes that such Circulation System Segment is Complete, the Developer shall deliver to the City Engineer (i) if as-built drawings or similar plans and specifications for such Circulation System Segment have not previously been submitted to the City Engineer, such drawings or plans and specifications, together with a certification of the Developer that such drawings or plans and specifications are true, correct and complete, and (ii) such information and documentation as is reasonably required by the City Engineer in order for the City Engineer to determine whether such Circulation System Segment is Complete. Upon receipt of such information and documentation, the City Engineer shall conduct a review in order to confirm that such Circulation System Segment is Complete. If, as a result of such review, the City Engineer determines that such Circulation System Segment is Complete, the City Engineer shall sign a copy of the original Payment Request therefor, indicating thereon that such Circulation System Segment is Complete and that the full amount of the Purchase Price of such Segment is eligible for payment, and forward the same to the City. (d) Acceptable Title to all property on, in or over which each Segment will be located shall be conveyed to the City by way of grant deed, quitclaim, or dedication of such property, or easement thereon, if such easement is approved by the City as being a sufficient interest therein 3608
11 4158-0112-1887.2
to permit the City to properly own, operate and maintain such Segment located therein, thereon or thereover, and to permit the Developer to perform its obligations as set forth in this Acquisition Agreement.
Upon the request of the City, the Developer shall furnish to the City a title report for such property not previously dedicated or otherwise conveyed to the City or its designee, for review and approval at least 20 calendar days prior to the transfer of Acceptable Title to a Segment to the City or its designee. The City shall approve the title report unless it reveals a matter that, in the reasonable judgment of the City, could materially affect the City’s or its designee’s use and enjoyment of any part of the property or easement covered by the title report. In the event the City does not approve the title report, the City shall not be obligated to accept title to such Segment until such objections to title have been cured to the reasonable satisfaction of the City. (e) Upon (i) the execution by the City Engineer of a Payment Request for a Segment indicating that such Segment is Complete, and (ii) the City’s determination that Acceptable Title to the property on, in or over which each Segment is located has been or is being conveyed to the City, such Segment shall be accepted by the City. The Developer shall transfer to the City, by appropriate instrument in accordance with the Conditions of Approval, title to each Segment accepted by the City pursuant hereto; provided, however, that notwithstanding such transfer, as provided in Section 3.6 hereof, the Developer shall be responsible for the maintenance of such Segment until the Acceptance Date of the Component of which such Segment is a part.
Section 2.3. Payment of Purchase Price. (a) Upon receipt of a reviewed and fully signed Payment Request pursuant to Section 2.2(b) hereof indicating that a Segment is Complete and that the Purchase Price of such Segment is eligible for payment, the City shall, within five business days of the approval and confirmation thereof by the City Engineer, by written request, direct the Trustee to pay from the Developer Acquisition Account such Purchase Price. If the Payment Request for a Segment requests that the Purchase Price requested to be paid pursuant thereto be paid to the Person or Persons, in the amounts, set forth in the completed Purchase Price Payment Instructions attached thereto as Attachment B, the City shall direct the Trustee to pay from the Developer Acquisition Account such Purchase Price or portion thereof to such Person or Persons.
(b) Upon receipt of a reviewed and fully signed Payment Request pursuant to Section 2.2(c) hereof indicating that a Circulation System Segment is Substantially Complete and that an amount equal to 85% of the Purchase Price of such Circulation System Segment is eligible for payment, the City shall, within five business days of the approval and confirmation thereof by the City Engineer, by written request, direct the Trustee to pay from the Developer Acquisition Account 85% of the Purchase Price of such Circulation System Segment. If the Payment Request for a Circulation System Segment requests that the 85% of the Purchase Price of such Circulation System Segment requested to be paid pursuant thereto be paid to the Person or Persons, in the amounts, set forth in the completed Purchase Price Payment Instructions attached thereto as Attachment B, the City shall direct the Trustee to pay from the Developer Acquisition Account such 85% of such Purchase Price or portion thereof to such Person or Persons.
3609
12 4158-0112-1887.2
ARTICLE III
CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES
Section 3.1. Preparation and Approval of Plans and Specifications. The Developer shall cause Plans to be prepared for the Facilities to be acquired pursuant hereto in accordance with the Conditions of Approval. The Developer shall obtain the written approval of the Plans from all appropriate departments of the City or from any other public agency or public utility from which such approval must be obtained. The Developer shall provide copies of all such Plans to the City Engineer. The Plans for a Segment shall be updated from time to time to reflect changed conditions or circumstances with respect thereto, the Developer shall obtain the written approval of such updated Plans from all appropriate departments of the City and the Developer shall provide copies of all such updated Plans to the City Engineer.
Section 3.2. Duty of the Developer to Construct. The Developer shall construct or cause to be constructed the Segments in accordance with the Conditions of Approval and the approved Plans. The Developer shall perform all of its obligations hereunder and shall conduct or cause to be conducted all operations with respect to the construction of the Segments in a good, workmanlike and commercially reasonable manner, with the standard of diligence and care normally employed by duly qualified Persons utilizing commercially reasonable efforts in the performance of comparable work and in accordance with generally accepted practices appropriate to the activities undertaken. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Developer shall not be required to construct any Facilities or cause such Facilities to be constructed other than at the time required by, and in accordance with, the Conditions of Approval or to perform any work requiring a contractor’s license, nor shall the Developer be deemed to be performing construction services pursuant to this Acquisition Agreement.
Section 3.3. Public Works Requirements. (a) In order to ensure that the Segments that are acquired by the City pursuant to this Acquisition Agreement are constructed as if they had been constructed under the direction and supervision, or under the authority of, the City, so that they may be acquired pursuant to California Government Code Section 53313.5, the Developer shall comply with or cause to be complied with all of the requirements of this Section for each Segment for which the Developer submits a Payment Request. (b) Notice inviting sealed bids for the construction of each Segment shall be given as required for public works projects in conformance with the California Public Contracts Code. (c) The contract for the construction of each Segment shall be awarded to the responsible bidder submitting the lowest responsive bid for the construction of such Segment. (d) The Developer shall require, and the specifications and bid and contract documents shall require, all contractors, subcontractors, vendors, equipment operators and owner operators, in each such case to the extent such Persons are engaged to perform work on a Segment, to pay at least General Prevailing Wage Rates to all workers employed in the execution of the contract, to post a copy of the General Prevailing Wage Rates at the job-site in a conspicuous place available to all employees and applicants for employment, and to otherwise 3610
13 4158-0112-1887.2
comply with applicable provisions of the California Labor Code, the California Government Code and the California Public Contracts Code relating to public works projects of cities.
The Developer shall require, and the specifications and bid and contract documents shall require, for all contracts involving in excess of $30,000 or 20 working days, all contractors, subcontractors, vendors, equipment operators and owner operators, in each such case to the extent such Persons are engaged to perform work on a Segment, to comply with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the California Labor Code with respect to all apprenticeable occupations upon the project.
(e) In performing its obligations under this Acquisition Agreement, the Developer shall comply with, or cause to be complied with, the applicable nondiscrimination and affirmative action provisions of the laws of the United States of America, the State and the City.
In performing its obligations under this Acquisition Agreement, the Developer shall not discriminate in its employment practices against any employee, or applicant for employment, because of such person’s race, religion, national origin, ancestry, sex, sexual orientation, age, physical handicap, marital status or medical condition. The Developer shall require that any contract for the construction of any Segment subject the contractor thereunder to the provisions of this subsection.
(f) The Developer shall require that each contractor, subcontractor, vendor, equipment operator and owner operator, in each such case to the extent such Person is engaged to perform work on a Segment, provide proof of insurance coverage satisfying the requirements of Section 3.7 hereof throughout the term of the construction of such Segment; provided, however, that, rather than requiring such contractors, subcontractors, vendors, equipment operators and owner operators to provide such insurance, the Developer may provide the same for the benefit of such contractors, subcontractors, vendors, equipment operators and owner operators.
(g) The Developer shall comply, and shall cause each contractor, subcontractor, vendor, equipment operator and owner operator, in each such case to the extent such Person is engaged to perform work on a Segment, to comply, with such other requirements relating to the construction of the Segments as the City may impose by written notification delivered to the Developer, to the extent legally required as a result of changes in applicable federal, State or City laws.
(h) The Developer shall require, and the specifications and bid and contract documents shall require, all contractors, subcontractors, vendors, equipment operators and owner operators, in each such case to the extent such Persons are engaged to perform work on a Segment, to submit certified weekly payroll records to the Developer for inspection by the City, and to furnish certified payroll records to the City promptly upon request.
The Developer shall provide proof to the City, at such intervals and in such form as the City may reasonably require, that the foregoing requirements have been satisfied as to all of the Segments for which a Payment Request is submitted pursuant hereto. 3611
14 4158-0112-1887.2
Section 3.4. Bonding Requirements. Prior to the commencement of construction of a Segment, the Developer shall secure, or shall cause each contractor, subcontractor, vendor, equipment operator and owner operator, in each such case to the extent such Person is engaged to perform work on such Segment to secure, appropriate bonds for the construction and completion of construction of such Segment, a faithful performance bond and a bond for the security of laborers and materialmen, each in an amount that is equal to 100% of the contract price for such Segment. If any such bonds for a Segment are provided by such a contractor, subcontractor, vendor, equipment operator or owner operator, the City shall be named as an additional insured on such bonds. Each issuer of any such bond shall be duly authorized to issue such bond in the State. Each such bond shall comply with the provisions of California Government Code Sections 66499.1 and 66499.2.
Section 3.5. Inspection; Completion of Construction. The City shall have primary responsibility for providing inspection of the work of construction of the Segments to ensure that the work of construction is accomplished in accordance with the Plans. The City’s personnel shall have access to the site of the work of construction at all reasonable times for the purpose of accomplishing such inspection. Upon the completion of the construction of a Segment to the satisfaction of the City’s inspectors, the Developer shall notify the City and the City Engineer in writing that the construction of such Segment has been completed in accordance with the Plans.
No later than ten days after receiving notification pursuant to Section 2.2(b) or Section 2.2(c) hereof that a Segment was constructed in accordance with the Plans therefor, the Developer shall forthwith file with the San Bernardino County Recorder a Notice of Completion, in form acceptable to the City Engineer, pursuant to the provisions of Section 3093 of the California Civil Code, if applicable. The Developer shall furnish to the City a duplicate copy of each such Notice of Completion showing thereon the date of filing with said County Recorder.
Section 3.6. Maintenance of Facilities; Warranties. The Developer shall maintain each Segment in good and safe condition until the Acceptance Date of the Component of which such Segment is a part. Prior to the Acceptance Date of the Component of which such Segment is a part, the Developer shall be responsible for maintaining such Segment in proper operating condition, and shall perform such maintenance on such Segment as the City Engineer reasonably determines to be necessary. As of the Acceptance Date of the Component of which a Segment is a part, the Developer shall assign to the City all of the Developer’s rights in any warranties, guarantees, maintenance obligations or other evidence of contingent obligations of third Persons with respect to such Segment. The Developer shall warrant each Segment to be free from construction defects (and shall correct or cause to be corrected any such defects) for a period of one year from the Acceptance Date of the Component of which such Segment is a part, or alternatively, shall provide a bond reasonably acceptable in form and substance to the City and the Developer for such period and such purpose to ensure that such defects that appear within said period will be repaired, replaced or corrected by the Developer, at its own cost and expense, to the reasonable satisfaction of the City. The Developer shall continue to repair, replace or correct any such defects within 30 Days after written notice thereof by the City to the Developer, and shall complete such repairs, replacement or correction as soon as practicable.
Section 3.7. Insurance Requirements. The Developer shall, at all times prior to the final Acceptance Date of all Segments, maintain, deliver to the City and keep in full force and 3612
15 4158-0112-1887.2
effect, the following insurance policies or, pursuant to Section 3.3(f) hereof, cause each contractor, subcontractor, vendor, equipment operator and owner operator, in each such case to the extent such Person is engaged to perform work on a Segment, to so maintain, deliver and keep the same in full force and effect:
(a) a protective liability policy providing for not less than the following amounts:
Bodily Injury $1,000,000 each person
$2,000,000 each occurrence
$1,000,000 each accident for
products and completed operations
Property Damage $1,000,000 each accident
Workers’ Compensation Statutory, with a waiver of
subrogation in favor of the City
(b) Automobile Liability Insurance to include all owned, non-owned or nonhired vehicles, including loading and unloading thereof:
Automobile Bodily Injury $1,000,000 each person
$2,000,000 each occurrence
Automobile Property Damage $1,000,000 each accident
Each liability insurance policy shall bear an endorsement or shall have attached a rider whereby it is provided that, in the event of expiration or proposed cancellation of such policy for any reason whatsoever, the City shall be notified by registered mail, return receipt requested, giving a sufficient time before the date thereof to comply with any applicable law or statute, but in no event less than 30 days before expiration or cancellation is effective.
The following statement shall be included on the insurance certificate:
Additional Insured: The insurer agrees that the City, its City Council, and/or all City Council appointed groups, committees, boards and any other City Council appointed body, and/or elective and appointive officers, servants, agents or employees of the City, when acting as such, are additional insureds hereunder, for the acts of the insured, and such insurance shall be primary to any insurance of the City.
The Developer may effect such coverage under blanket insurance policies; provided, however, that (a) such policies are written on a per occurrence basis, (b) such policies comply in all other respects with the provisions of this Section, and (c) the protection afforded the City under any such policy shall be no less than that which would be available under a separate policy relating only to the Segments. All policies of insurance shall be with companies licensed or approved by the California Commissioner of Insurance and rated A-VII or better in the most recent edition of Best’s Insurance Guide and shall be issued and delivered in accordance with State law and regulations.
3613
16 4158-0112-1887.2
If the Developer fails to maintain or cause to be maintained any insurance required hereby, the City may, but shall not be obligated to, procure such insurance and recover the amount of the premiums therefor from the Developer or retain such amount from any monies due to the Developer under this Acquisition Agreement. The failure of the City to procure any such insurance shall in no way relieve the Developer of any of its obligations under this Acquisition Agreement.
Section 3.8. Ownership of Facilities. Notwithstanding the fact that some or all of the Facilities may be constructed in dedicated street rights-of-way or on property that has been or will be dedicated to the City, the Facilities shall be and remain the property of the Developer until title thereto is conveyed to and accepted by the City as provided herein and in the Conditions of Approval. Such ownership by the Developer shall likewise not be affected by any agreement that the Developer may have entered into or may enter into with the City pursuant to the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66410 et seq. of the California Government Code, and the provisions of this Section and the Conditions of Approval shall control. 3614
17 4158-0112-1887.2
ARTICLE IV
REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES AND COVENANTS; INDEMNIFICATION Section 4.1. Representations and Warranties of the Developer. The Developer makes the following representations and warranties for the benefit of the City:
(a) Organization. The Developer represents and warrants that the Developer is a limited liability company duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of Delaware, is authorized to conduct business and is in good standing under the laws of the State, and has the power and authority to own its properties and assets and to carry on its business as now being conducted and as now contemplated.
(b) Authority. The Developer represents and warrants that the Developer has the power and authority to enter into this Acquisition Agreement, and has taken all action necessary to cause this Acquisition Agreement to be executed and delivered, and this Acquisition Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered on behalf of the Developer.
(c) Binding Obligation. The Developer represents and warrants that this Acquisition Agreement is a valid and binding obligation of the Developer and is enforceable against the Developer in accordance with its terms, subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization or other similar laws affecting the enforcement of creditors’ rights in general and by general equity principles.
(d) Environmental Matters Relating to Segments. The Developer represents and warrants that none of the Developer, any Affiliate of the Developer, or any subcontractor, agent or employee of the Developer or an Affiliate thereof, has used, generated, manufactured, procured, stored, released, discharged or disposed of (whether accidentally or intentionally) any Hazardous Material on, under or in any Segment or the Related Property of such Segment, or transported (whether accidentally or intentionally) any Hazardous Material to or from such Segment or such Related Property, in violation of any federal, state or local law, ordinance, regulation, rule or decision regulating Hazardous Material.
The Developer represents and warrants that, as of the Acceptance Date of each Segment, there will not be present on, under or in such Segment or the Related Property of such Segment, or any portion thereof, any Hazardous Materials, except for (i) any types or amounts that do not require remediation or mitigation under federal, state or local laws, ordinances, regulations, rules or decisions, (ii) those that have been remediated or mitigated in full compliance with applicable federal, state or local laws, ordinances, regulations, rules or decisions, or (iii) those with respect to which ongoing remediation or mitigation is being performed in full compliance with applicable federal, state or local laws, ordinances, regulations, rules or decisions. 3615
18 4158-0112-1887.2
The Developer represents and warrants that neither the Developer nor any Affiliate thereof has received notice of, and, to the best of the Developer’s knowledge, there is not, any proceeding or formal inquiry by any governmental authority, body or agency with respect to the presence of Hazardous Materials on, under or in any Segment or the Related Property of such Segment, or any portion thereof, or any structure, fixtures, equipment or other objects thereon, or the migration thereof from or to other property.
Section 4.2. Covenants of the Developer. The Developer makes the following covenants for the benefit of the City:
(a) Completion of Segments. The Developer covenants that it will use its reasonable and diligent efforts to do all things that may be lawfully required of it in order to cause the Segments to be completed in accordance with this Acquisition Agreement and the Conditions of Approval.
(b) Compliance with Laws. The Developer covenants that, while any of the Facilities are owned by the Developer or required pursuant to this Acquisition Agreement to be maintained by the Developer, it will not commit, suffer or permit any of its agents, employees or contractors to commit any act to be done in, upon or to such Facilities in violation in any material respect of any law, ordinance, rule, regulation or order of any governmental authority or any covenant, condition or restriction now or hereafter affecting such Facilities or the Property on, in or over which such Facilities are located. (c) Payment Requests. The Developer covenants that (i) it will not request payment pursuant to this Acquisition Agreement for the acquisition of any improvements that are not part of a Segment, and (ii) it will diligently follow all procedures set forth in this Acquisition Agreement with respect to Payment Requests. (d) Financial Records. Until the Acceptance Date of the last Segment accepted by the City pursuant hereto, the Developer covenants to maintain proper books of record and account for the Facilities and all costs related thereto. The Developer covenants that such accounting books will be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and will be available for inspection by the City within a reasonable time after the City submits a written request to the Developer requesting that such books be made available for inspection.
(e) Environmental Matters Relating to Segments. The Developer covenants that none of the Developer, any Affiliate of the Developer or any subcontractor, agent or employee thereof, will use, generate, manufacture, procure, store, release, discharge or dispose of (whether accidentally or intentionally) at any time on or prior to the Acceptance Date of each Segment any Hazardous Material on, under or in such Segment or the Related Property of such Segment, or transport (whether accidentally or intentionally) any Hazardous Material to or from such Segment or such Related Property, in violation of any federal, state or local law, ordinance, regulation, rule or decision regulating Hazardous Material in effect at the time of such use, generation, manufacturing, procurement, storage, release, discharge, disposal or transportation. 3616
19 4158-0112-1887.2
(f) Permits. The Developer covenants that it will obtain all governmental or other permits required to proceed with the construction of the Facilities, and that it will pay all fees relating thereto that are required to be paid, in accordance with the Conditions of Approval.
Section 4.3. Covenants of the City. The City makes the following covenants for the benefit of the Developer:
(a) Completion of Segments. The City covenants that it will use its reasonable and diligent efforts to take all actions that may be lawfully required of it in issuing permits, processing and approving Plans and inspecting the Segments in accordance with this Acquisition Agreement.
(b) Payment Requests. The City covenants that it will diligently follow all procedures set forth in this Acquisition Agreement with respect to Payment Requests. (c) Developer Acquisition Account. The City covenants (i) that, if the Special Tax is to be levied and collected prior to the issuance of Bonds, the City will, at or prior to the first receipt of proceeds of the Special Tax, establish the Developer Acquisition Account, (ii) that the City will deposit the Net Proceeds received prior to the issuance of Bonds in the Developer Acquisition Account, and (iii) that upon the issuance of Bonds, the City will transfer or cause to be transferred any Net Proceeds remaining in the Developer Acquisition Account to the Trustee for deposit in the Developer Acquisition Account established under the Indenture.
(d) Accounting. The City covenants to provide the Developer, within 30 days following the Developer’s written request, an accounting of the Developer Acquisition Account, showing the current balance therein and all deposits thereto and disbursements therefrom since the last such accounting. The Developer shall not make more than two such written requests in any calendar year.
Section 4.4. Indemnification. The Developer agrees to protect, indemnify, defend and hold the City and the Community Facilities District, and its respective officers, employees and agents (the “Indemnified Parties”), and each of them, harmless from and against any and all claims, losses, expenses, suits, actions, decrees, judgments, awards, attorney’s fees and court costs that any Indemnified Party may suffer or that may be sought against or recovered or obtained from any Indemnified Party as a result of or by reason of or arising out of or in consequence of (a) the acquisition, construction, installation or financing of the Facilities, (b) the untruth or inaccuracy of any representation or warranty made by the Developer in this Acquisition Agreement or in any certifications delivered by the Developer pursuant hereto or in connection with the issuance of any Bonds, (c) the release, threatened release, storage, treatment, transportation or disposal (as such terms are defined in applicable law) of any Hazardous Materials on, under, in, from or to any portion of the Property while such portion of the Property is owned by the Developer or an Affiliate thereof, and (d) any act or omission of the Developer, any Affiliate of the Developer or any of their subcontractors, or their respective officers, employees or agents, in connection with the Facilities, including noncompliance with any covenants made by the Developer in this Acquisition Agreement. If the Developer fails to do so, 3617
20 4158-0112-1887.2
the Indemnified Party shall have the right, but not the obligation, to defend the same and charge all of the direct or incidental costs of such defense, including any fees or costs, to and recover the same from the Developer.
Upon receipt by an Indemnified Party of notice of any claim, loss, expense, suit, action, decree, judgment or award for which the Developer is obligated to protect, indemnify, defend and hold such Indemnified Party harmless pursuant to this Section, such Indemnified Party shall promptly notify the Developer in writing of such claim, loss, expense, suit, action, decree, judgment or award. Neither the Developer nor an Indemnified Party shall, without the other’s written consent, settle, compromise or consent to the entry of judgment with respect to any claim, suit or action for which the Developer is obligated to protect, indemnify, defend and hold such Indemnified Party harmless pursuant to this Section.
No indemnification is required to be paid by the Developer for any claim, loss or expense (a) arising from the willful misconduct or negligence of an Indemnified Party, or (b) arising from the use or operation of a Segment after the Acceptance Date of the Component of which such Segment is a part, unless such claim, loss or expense results from the defective or improper design, construction or installation of such Segment.
The provisions of this Section shall survive the termination of this Acquisition Agreement.
3618
21 4158-0112-1887.2
ARTICLE V
EVENTS OF DEFAULT AND REMEDIES; FORCE MAJEURE
Section 5.1. Developer Events of Default. The following shall be Developer Events of Default:
(a) the Developer shall voluntarily file for reorganization or other relief under any Federal or state bankruptcy or insolvency law;
(b) the Developer shall have any involuntary bankruptcy or insolvency action filed against it, or shall suffer a trustee in bankruptcy or insolvency or receiver to take possession of the assets of the Developer, or shall suffer an attachment or levy of execution to be made against its property unless, in any of such cases, such action, possession, attachment or levy shall have been terminated or released within 60 days after the commencement thereof;
(c) except to the extent that the Developer’s obligation to construct or cause to be constructed the Facilities is excused pursuant to Section 5.5 hereof, the Developer shall abandon construction of the Facilities that, as of the time of such abandonment, the Developer is required to construct or cause to be constructed in accordance with the Conditions of Approval (failure for a period of three consecutive months or failure for two periods of two consecutive months to undertake substantial work related to the construction of the Facilities shall constitute a non-exclusive example of such abandonment);
(d) the Developer shall breach any covenant or default in the performance of any obligation under this Acquisition Agreement and such breach or default shall have continued for a period of 60 days after written notice thereof, specifying such breach or default and requiring the same to be remedied, shall have been given to the Developer by the City; provided, however, that, if in the reasonable opinion of the City such breach or default can be corrected, but not within such 60 day period, such breach or default shall not constitute a Developer Event of Default if corrective action is instituted by the Developer within such 60 day period and the Developer thereafter diligently and in good faith cures such breach or default in a period of time reasonably determined by the City to be appropriate under the circumstances;
(e) any representation or warranty of the Developer set forth herein or in any certifications delivered by the Developer hereunder shall prove to have been false or misleading in any material respect when made or deemed made; (f) the Developer shall transfer any of its rights or obligations under this Acquisition Agreement, without the prior written consent of the City, as provided in Section 6.3 hereof;
(g) the Developer shall have made any material misrepresentation or material omission in any written materials furnished in connection with any preliminary official 3619
22 4158-0112-1887.2
statement, official statement or bond purchase contract that has not been corrected and is used in connection with the sale of any Bonds;
(h) the Developer, any Affiliate thereof or any permitted assign or successorin-interest under this Acquisition Agreement shall at any time bring any action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation at law or in equity, before any court, regulatory agency, public board or body that in any way seeks to challenge or overturn the Community Facilities District, the levy of the Special Tax in accordance with the Rate and Method or the validity of the Bonds or the proceedings leading up to their issuance; provided, however, that the Developer, any Affiliate thereof or any permitted assign or successor-in-interest under this Acquisition Agreement that owns any of the Property may bring an action or suit contending that the Special Tax has not been levied in accordance with the methodology contained in the Rate and Method; (i) the Developer shall materially fail to complete the Facilities as contemplated by this Acquisition Agreement and the Conditions of Approval and such failure shall have continued for a period of 60 days after written notice thereof, specifying such failure and requiring the same to be remedied, shall have been given to the Developer by the City; provided, however, that, if in the reasonable opinion of the City such failure can be corrected, but not within such 60 day period, such failure shall not constitute a Developer Event of Default if corrective action is instituted by the Developer within such 60 day period and the Developer thereafter diligently and in good faith cures such breach or default in a period of time reasonably determined by the City to be appropriate under the circumstances; or
(j) the Developer, any Affiliate thereof or any permitted assign or successorin-interest under this Acquisition Agreement that owns any of the Property on which the Special Tax has been levied shall fail to pay such Special Tax as and when due and such failure shall have continued for a period of 60 days after written notice thereof, specifying such failure and requiring the same to be remedied, shall have been given to the Developer by the City.
Section 5.2. Remedies for Developer Events of Default. (a) If a Developer Event of Default described in subsection (a), (b) or (h) of Section 5.1 hereof occurs, this Acquisition Agreement shall automatically terminate.
(b) If a Developer Event of Default described in subsection (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (i) or (j) of Section 5.1 hereof occurs and is continuing, the City may terminate this Acquisition Agreement by delivering a written notice of such termination to the Developer. (c) If a Developer Event of Default occurs and is continuing, the City may pursue any other remedy at law or equity available with respect thereto. (d) If this Acquisition Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City may, but shall not be obligated to, complete the acquisition, construction and installation of any Segment not theretofore acquired from the Developer pursuant hereto, and the City may use all or any portion of the monies in the Developer Acquisition Account to pay for such acquisition, 3620
23 4158-0112-1887.2
construction and installation. In the event of such termination, the Developer shall have no claim or right to any further payment of the Purchase Price of any Segment.
Section 5.3. City Events of Default. The following shall be City Events of Default:
(a) the City shall voluntarily file for reorganization or other relief under any Federal or state bankruptcy or insolvency law;
(b) the City shall have any involuntary bankruptcy or insolvency action filed against it, or shall suffer a trustee in bankruptcy or insolvency or receiver to take possession of the assets of the City, or shall suffer an attachment or levy of execution to be made against its property, in any of such cases, such action, possession, attachment or levy shall have been terminated or released within 60 days after the commencement thereof;
(c) the City shall breach any covenant or default in the performance of any obligation under this Acquisition Agreement and such breach or default shall have continued for a period of 60 days after written notice thereof, specifying such breach or default and requiring the same to be remedied, shall have been given to the City by the Developer; provided, however, that, if in the reasonable opinion of the Developer such breach or default can be corrected, but not within such 60 day period, such breach or default shall not constitute a City Event of Default if corrective action is instituted by the City within such 60 day period and the City thereafter diligently and in good faith cures such breach or default in a period of time reasonably determined by the Developer to be appropriate under the circumstances;
(d) any representation or warranty of the City set forth herein shall prove to have been false or misleading in any material respect when made; and (e) the City shall transfer any of its respective rights or obligations under this Acquisition Agreement, without the prior written consent of the Developer, as provided in Section 6.3 hereof.
Section 5.4. Remedies for City Events of Default. (a) If a City Event of Default occurs and is continuing, the Developer may terminate this Acquisition Agreement by delivering a written notice of such termination to the City.
(b) If a City Event of Default occurs and is continuing, the Developer may pursue any other remedy at law or equity available with respect thereto; provided, however, that the City shall not be liable in damages to the Developer. In light of the foregoing, the Developer covenants not to sue for or claim any damages for any alleged breach of, or dispute that arises out of, this Acquisition Agreement.
(c) The Developer understands and acknowledges that the City would not have entered into this Acquisition Agreement if it were to be liable in damages under or with respect to this Acquisition Agreement. Any and all obligations of the City hereunder shall be payable only from amounts on deposit in the Developer Acquisition Account. The City shall have no 3621
24 4158-0112-1887.2
pecuniary liability under this Acquisition Agreement for any act or omission of the City, except as set forth in this Section.
Section 5.5. Force Majeure. (a) Except as may be specifically provided in this Acquisition Agreement, the performance by the City or the Developer of its respective obligations hereunder shall be excused during, and the period of time for performance of its respective obligations hereunder shall be extended for a period of time equal to, any period of delay caused by reason of (i) acts of God or civil commotion, (ii) riots, strikes, picketing or other labor disputes, (iii) shortages of materials or supplies, (iv) damage to work in progress by reason of fire, floods, earthquakes or other casualty, (v) enactment of laws that prevent or preclude compliance by the City or the Developer with a material provision of this Acquisition Agreement, (vi) administrative proceedings challenging the Community Facilities District, any Bonds, this Acquisition Agreement or a Payment Request brought by Persons other than the City or the Developer, or any Affiliate thereof, (vii) litigation, including the pendency thereof, brought by Persons other than the City or the Developer, or any Affiliate thereof, including litigation challenging the Community Facilities District, the development of the Property, any Bonds, this Acquisition Agreement or a Payment Request, (viii) pendency of initiatives or referenda affecting the Community Facilities District, the development of the Property, the Bonds, this Acquisition Agreement or a Payment Request, or (ix) any other cause beyond the reasonable control of the City or the Developer, respectively; provided, however that, as to any party (A) the financial inability of such party itself to perform under this Acquisition Agreement, and (B) the negligence or willful misconduct of such party shall not constitute a permitted delay for purposes of this Section and, provided, further, that any action, omission, or failure to approve a Payment Request, or the imposition of additional requirements or restrictions in connection therewith by the City, caused by the Developer’s actual failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations or the provisions of this Acquisition Agreement (other than an actual failure to comply that results from the enactment of laws that prevent or preclude compliance by a party with a material provision of this Acquisition Agreement, administrative proceedings challenging the Community Facilities District, any Bonds, this Acquisition Agreement, a Payment Request, litigation brought by Persons other than a party hereto, or an Affiliate of a party hereto, including litigation challenging the Community Facilities District, the development of the Property, any Bonds, this Acquisition Agreement, a Payment Request, or initiative or referenda affecting the Community Facilities District, the development of the Property, any Bonds, this Acquisition Agreement, a Payment Request), shall not constitute a permitted delay for the Developer for purposes of this Section. (b) If the City or the Developer shall claim that performance of its respective obligations hereunder is excused by a permitted delay pursuant to this Section, such party shall give the other party hereto written notice of the commencement of such permitted delay within 30 days after first gaining knowledge of such permitted delay. (c) If the City or the Developer shall claim that performance of its respective obligations hereunder is excused by a permitted delay pursuant to this Section, such party’s performance shall only be excused during, and the period of time for performance of its obligations hereunder shall only be extended for a period of time equal to, the period of time for which the cause of such permitted delay is in effect and is actually causing a delay in performance by such party of its obligations hereunder. 3622
25 4158-0112-1887.2
(d) The City and the Developer shall act diligently and in good faith to avoid foreseeable delays in performance and to remove the cause of any permitted delay under this Section or develop a reasonable alternative means of performance of its respective obligations hereunder.
3623
26 4158-0112-1887.2
ARTICLE VI
MISCELLANEOUS
Section 6.1. Developer as Independent Contractor. Each of the City and the Developer hereby acknowledges and agrees that the Developer, in performing its obligations under this Acquisition Agreement, is acting as an independent contractor and not as an agent of the City. The City shall not have any responsibility for payment to any contractor, subcontractor or supplier of the Developer.
Section 6.2. Other Agreements. Nothing contained herein shall be construed as affecting the City’s or the Developer’s respective duty to perform its respective obligations under other agreements, land use regulations or subdivision requirements relating to the development of the Property, which obligations are and shall remain independent of the Developer’s rights and obligations, and the City’s rights and obligations, under this Acquisition Agreement; provided, however, that the Developer shall use its reasonable and diligent efforts to perform each and every covenant to be performed by it under any lien or encumbrance, instrument, declaration, covenant, condition, restriction, license, order or other agreement, the nonperformance of which could reasonably be expected to materially and adversely affect the acquisition, construction and installation of the Segments.
Section 6.3. Binding on Successors and Assigns. Neither this Acquisition Agreement nor the duties and obligations of the Developer hereunder may be assigned to any Person without the written consent of the City, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. Neither this Acquisition Agreement nor the duties and obligations of the City hereunder may be assigned to any Person, without the written consent of the Developer, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. The agreements and covenants included herein shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of any partners, permitted assigns, and successors-in-interest of the parties hereto.
Section 6.4. Amendments. This Acquisition Agreement may be amended, supplemented or otherwise modified only by an instrument in writing executed and delivered by the City and the Developer.
Section 6.5. Waivers. No waiver of, or consent with respect to, any provision of this Acquisition Agreement by a party hereto shall in any event be effective unless the same shall be in writing and signed by such party, and then such waiver or consent shall be effective only in the specific instance and for the specific purpose for which it was given.
Section 6.6. Third-Party Beneficiaries. The Community Facilities District shall be a third-party beneficiary hereof. No other Person shall be deemed to be a third-party beneficiary hereof, and nothing in this Acquisition Agreement, either express or implied, is intended to confer upon any Person, other than the City, the Developer and the Community Facilities District and their respective successors and assigns, any rights, remedies, obligations or liabilities under or by reason of this Acquisition Agreement.
3624
27 4158-0112-1887.2
Section 6.7. Notices. Any written notice, statement, demand, consent, approval, authorization, offer, designation, request or other communication to be given hereunder shall be given to the party entitled thereto at its address set forth below, or at such other address as such party may provide to the other party in writing from time to time, namely:
City: City of Ontario
303 East “B” Street
Ontario, California 91764
Attention: Executive Director of Finance
Developer: KB HOME Cal Management Services LLC
36310 Inland Valley Drive, Suite 300
Wildomar, California 92595
Attention: Scott Hansen, Vice President, Forward Planning Each such notice, statement, demand, consent, approval, authorization, offer, designation, request or other communication hereunder shall be deemed delivered to the party to whom it is addressed (a) if given by courier or delivery service or if personally served or delivered, upon delivery, (b) if given by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, deposited with the United States mail postage prepaid, 72 hours after such notice is deposited with the United States mail, (c) if given by electronic mail, on the date sent, but only if confirmation of the receipt of such electronic mail is received or if notice is concurrently sent by another means specified herein, and (d) if given by any other means, upon delivery at the address specified in this Section.
Section 6.8. Attorneys’ Fees. If any action is instituted to interpret or enforce any of the provisions of this Acquisition Agreement, the party prevailing in such action shall be entitled to recover from the other party thereto reasonable attorney’s fees and costs of such suit (including both prejudgment and postjudgment fees and costs) as determined by the court as part of the judgment.
Section 6.9. Severability. If any term or provision of this Acquisition Agreement, or the application of the term or provision to any Person or circumstance is, to any extent, held to be invalid or unenforceable in any jurisdiction, but the extent of such invalidity or unenforceability does not destroy the basis of the bargain between the parties as contained herein, the remainder of this Acquisition Agreement, or the application of the term or provision to Persons or circumstances other than those as to which the term or provision is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected by such invalidity or unenforceability, and each remaining term or provision of this Assignment Agreement shall be valid and will be enforced to the fullest extent permitted by law.
Section 6.10. Governing Law. This Acquisition Agreement and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State.
Section 6.11. Jurisdiction and Venue. Each of the City and the Developer (a) agrees that any suit, action or other legal proceeding arising out of or relating to this Acquisition Agreement shall be brought in a state or local court in the County of San Bernardino or in the 3625
3626
A-1
4158-0112-1887.2
EXHIBIT A
FACILITIES
The Facilities consist of the following Components and Segments; provided, however, that each such Segment described below shall constitute a Segment for purposes of this Acquisition Agreement only if such Segment was constructed by or on behalf of the Developer singly and not jointly or in conjunction with another Member or NMC Builders:
Streets and Traffic Circulation System Facilities
No.
DIF Program
Project No. Component Segment
ST-1 ST-024 Ontario Ranch
Traffic Control
System
Signalized intersection improvements at Haven
Avenue and Eucalyptus Avenue
ST-2 ST-014 Haven Avenue
from Riverside
Drive to
Bellegrave
(Merrill) Avenue
Construction of approximately 1,300 linear feet
of full half width street improvements on the
west side of Haven Avenue beyond the curb
adjacent lanes along tract frontage from
Eucalyptus Avenue to Parkview Street
ST-3 ST-011 Eucalyptus
Avenue from
Euclid Avenue to
Milliken Avenue
Construction of approximately 1,340 linear feet
of full half width street improvements on the
south side of Eucalyptus Avenue beyond the
curb adjacent lanes along tract frontage to Haven
Avenue
ST-4 Last Lane Last Lane Construction of approximately 1,300 linear feet of curb adjacent last lane street, curb, gutter,
sidewalk, and street lighting improvements on
the west side of Haven Avenue along tract
frontage from Eucalyptus Avenue to Parkview
Street
ST-5 Last Lane Last Lane Construction of approximately 1,340 linear feet of curb adjacent last lane street, curb, gutter,
sidewalk, and street lighting improvements on
the south side of Eucalyptus Avenue along tract
frontage to Haven Avenue
3627
A-2
4158-0112-1887.2
Streets and Traffic Circulation System Facilities
ST-6 Parkway Parkway Construction of approximately 1,300 linear feet of neighborhood edge, landscaping, and public
improvements in the right-of-way on the west
side of Haven Avenue along tract frontage from
Eucalyptus Avenue to Parkview Street
ST-7 Parkway Parkway Construction of approximately 1,205 linear feet of raised landscaped median in Haven Avenue
from Eucalyptus Avenue to Parkview Street
ST-8 Parkway Parkway Construction of approximately 1,340 linear feet of neighborhood edge, landscaping, and public
improvements in the right-of-way on the south
side of Eucalyptus Avenue along tract frontage
to Haven Avenue
Water and Recycled Water System Facilities
No.
DIF Program
Project No. Component Segment
W-1 WT-016 Recycled Water
Systems
Approximately 1,193 linear feet of 8-inch of
recycled water improvements in Haven Avenue
along tract frontage
W-2 WT-016 Recycled Water
Systems
Approximately 1,391 linear feet of 16-inch of
recycled water improvements in Eucalyptus
Avenue along tract frontage
Fiber Optic System Facilities
No.
DIF Program
Project No. Component Segment
F-1 FO-004 Distribution
Network - Major
Streets Conduit
System
Approximately 1,391 linear feet of fiber optic
conduit in Haven Avenue from Eucalyptus
Avenue to the southerly boundary of TM 20472
(Parkview Street)
3628
B-1
4158-0112-1887.2
EXHIBIT B
FORM OF PAYMENT REQUEST
City of Ontario
Community Facilities District No. 76
(Compass Pointe)
The City of Ontario (the “City”) and KB HOME Cal Management Services LLC (the “Developer”), are parties to the Acquisition and Funding Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2025 (the “Acquisition Agreement”). Capitalized undefined terms use herein shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Acquisition Agreement. Pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement, the Developer hereby requests confirmation that the Segment described in Attachment A attached hereto (the “Segment”) is [Complete] [Substantially Complete] and hereby further requests approval of the Purchase Price of the Segment. In connection with this Payment Request, the Developer hereby represents and warrants to the City as follows:
(a) The person executing this Payment Request on behalf of the Developer is a Developer Representative, qualified to execute this Payment Request on behalf of the Developer and knowledgeable as to the matters set forth herein. (b) The Developer has submitted or submits herewith to the City Engineer asbuilt drawings or similar plans and specifications for the Segments for which payment is requested, and such drawings or plans and specifications, as applicable, are true, correct and complete; provided, however, that if such Segment is a Circulation System Segment, and certification is being requested that such Segment is Substantially Complete but not Complete, such drawings or plans and specifications need not be submitted to the City Engineer until certification is being requested that such Segment is Complete. (c) Each of the Segments described in Attachment A has been constructed in accordance with the Plans therefor, and in accordance with all applicable City standards and the requirements of the Acquisition Agreement, and the as-built drawings or similar Plans and specifications referenced in paragraph (b) above. (d) The true and correct Actual Cost of each Segment is set forth in Attachment A.
(e) The Developer has submitted or submits herewith to the City Engineer invoices, receipts, worksheets and other evidence of costs that are in sufficient detail to allow the City Engineer to verify the Actual Cost of each Segment for which payment is requested.
(f) There are no liens, rights to lien or attachment upon, or claims affecting the right to receive the payment requested herein that has not been released or will not be released simultaneously with the payment of such obligation, other than materialmen’s or mechanics’ liens accruing by operation of law. Copies of lien releases for all work for which payment is requested hereunder are attached hereto. 3629
B-2
4158-0112-1887.2
(g) No Developer Event of Default has occurred and is continuing. (h) The representations and warranties of the Developer set forth in Section 4.1 of the Acquisition Agreement are true and correct on and as of the date hereof with the same force and effect as if made on and as of the date hereof (except that no certification is made with respect to the representations and warranties contained in subsection (d) of said Section 4.1).
(i) As of the date hereof, there is not present on, under or in the Segment or the Related Property of the Segment, or any portion thereof, any Hazardous Materials, except for (i) any types or amounts that do not require remediation or mitigation under federal, state or local laws, ordinances, regulations, rules or decisions, (ii) those that have been remediated or mitigated in full compliance with applicable federal, state or local laws, ordinances, regulations, rules or decisions, (iii) those with respect to which ongoing remediation or mitigation is being performed in full compliance with applicable federal, state or local laws, ordinances, regulations, rules or decisions, or (iv) any types or amounts that do not present a human health risk or hazard to the public. (j) Each of the Segments described in Attachment A was constructed by or on behalf of the Developer singly and not jointly or in conjunction with another Member or NMC Builders.
The Developer hereby declares under penalty of perjury that the above representations and warranties are true and correct.
The Developer hereby requests that the Purchase Price be paid to the Person or Persons, in the amounts, set forth in Attachment B hereto.
Date: ___________
KB HOME CAL MANAGEMENT
SERVICES LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company
By:
Name:
Title:
3630
B-3
4158-0112-1887.2
CONFIRMATION AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY ENGINEER
[The City Engineer has (a) confirmed that the Segment described in Attachment A is Complete and was constructed in accordance with the Plans therefor, and (b) reviewed, verified and approved the Actual Cost of such Segment described in Attachment A. Such Segment is Complete and the Purchase Price therefor described in Attachment A is eligible for payment to the Developer pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement.]
[The City Engineer has (a) confirmed that the Segment described in Attachment A, which is a Circulation System Segment, is Substantially Complete and was constructed in accordance with the Plans therefor, and (b) reviewed, verified and approved the Actual Cost of such Segment described in Attachment A. Such Segment is Substantially Complete and $_________, an amount equal to 85% of the Purchase Price therefor described in Attachment A, is eligible for payment to the Developer pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement.] [The City Engineer previously confirmed that the Segment described in Attachment A was Substantially Complete, and previously indicated that $_________, an amount equal to 85% of the Purchase Price therefor described in Attachment A, was eligible for payment to the Developer pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement. The City Engineer has (a) now confirmed that such Segment is Complete and was constructed in accordance with the Plans therefor, and (b) reviewed, verified and approved the Actual Cost of such Segment described in Attachment A.
Such Segment is Complete and $_________, an amount equal to the remaining 15% of the Purchase Price therefor described in Attachment A is eligible for payment to the Developer pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement.]
Date: __________ CITY ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF
ONTARIO
By:
3631
B-4
4158-0112-1887.2
ATTACHMENT A
Segment Purchase Price
3632
B-5
4158-0112-1887.2
ATTACHMENT B
PURCHASE PRICE PAYMENT INSTRUCTIONS
The Developer hereby requests that the Purchase Price be paid to the Person or Persons, in the amounts, set forth below:
Payee No. 1: Pay $________/__% of the Purchase Price to ______________ by wire transfer in accordance with the following instructions:
[Insert wire transfer instructions]
Date:
KB HOME CAL MANAGEMENT
SERVICES LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company
By:
Name:
Title:
_____________________
[Note: If Exhibit A to the Acquisition Agreement indicates that the Segment being acquired includes design costs that have been paid by NMC Builders, the Payment Instructions must 3633
B-6
4158-0112-1887.2
include an instruction to pay NMC Builders the portion of the Purchase Price allocable to such design costs.]
3634
Department: Planning
Prepared By: Edmelynne V Hutter
Staff Member Presenting: Rudy Zeledon,
Executive Director Community Development
Approved By:
Submitted To: Council/OHA
Approved: _______________________________
Continued To: ___________________________
Denied: __________________________________
Item No: 15
SUBJECT: A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (FILE NO. PGPA23-003) PROPOSING TO AMEND THE ONTARIO PLAN 2050 POLICY PLAN (GENERAL PLAN) LAND USE MAP
CITY OF ONTARIO
Agenda Report
November 4, 2025
SECTION:
PUBLIC HEARINGS
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider and adopt a Resolution approving File No.
PGPA23-003, a General Plan Amendment to amend The Ontario Plan 2050 Policy Plan (General Plan) Land Use Map to change the land use designation of approximately 5.3 acres of land located on Euclid Avenue from Mixed Use to Business Park.
THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL GOALS ARE BEING ACHIEVED:
Invest in the Growth and Evolution of the City's Economy Operate in a Businesslike Manner
Ensure the Development of a Well Planned, Balanced, and Self-Sustaining Community in Ontario Ranch
FISCAL IMPACT: There is not a direct fiscal impact associated with this action.
BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS: On August 16, 2022, City Council certified The Ontario Plan 2050 Policy Plan (File No. PGPA20-002) update and certified Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) in conjunction with The Ontario Plan 2050 Update (TOP 2050; File No. PGPA20-002). On October 26, 2023, the Applicant applied for a General Plan Amendment, requesting to modify the TOP 2050 Land Use Plan for 5.3-acre Project site from Mixed Use to Business Park.
The Project site is located within the Euclid Mixed Use Specific Plan (File No. PSP22-001), which was approved by the City Council on September 3, 2024, establishing land use designations consistent with The Ontario Plan 2050 (TOP 2050). The associated Euclid Mixed Use Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (State Clearing House No. 2023020281) was certified by the City Council on August 20, 2024.
The proposed General Plan Amendment will establish the following:
Convert 5.3 acres of Mixed Use – Great Park (MU-Great Park) to Business Park (BP) located on Euclid Avenue, approximately 300 feet north of Edison Avenue.
Maintain 128 residential unit capacity to comply with Senate Bill 330.
Remove the Affordable Housing overlay on 5.3 acres Project site resulting in the reduction of 128 residential units.
3635
In compliance with Senate Bill 330, in order to maintain 128 residential unit capacity, the City is moving forward with a General Plan Amendment application (File No. PGPA24-003), which proposes amending 10 acres of land within the Esperanza Specific Plan, from Public School to Medium Density Residential, resulting in an overall residential increase of 224 dwelling units, which results in a net gain of 96 units.
The Project site is identified in the Housing Element Sites Inventory, and its removal requires adjustments to maintain Housing Element and Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) compliance. The Affordable Housing Overlay identifies the buildout of 128 residential units, which includes 64 Lower-Income units, 32 Moderate-Income units, and 32 Above-Moderate-Income units.
HOUSING ELEMENT COMPLIANCE
The 5.3-acre Project site is listed in the Housing Elements Sites contained in Tables B-1 and B-2 (Housing Element Sites Inventory) of the Housing Element Technical Report. With this amendment request, the RHNA obligations for each income category will continue to be adequately accommodated by the City's RHNA obligation. The City retains sufficient capacity to meet the Lower Income and Moderate-Income RHNA obligations as stated above. The Housing Element Sites Inventory provides an excess capacity of 209 units for Lower Income and an excess capacity of 491 units for Moderate Income, both of which can accommodate the respective reductions resulting from the proposed removal of the Affordable Housing Overlay on the subject site.
PLANNING COMMISSION
On September 23, 2025, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed General Plan Amendment. During public comment period, concerns were expressed about the removal of affordable housing. Staff clarified that with the proposed removal of the affordable units the City is still in compliance with the affordable housing requirements for Lower and Moderate-Income units due to the City's excess capacity of 209 units for Lower Income and an excess capacity of 491 units for Moderate Income. After considering public comments, the Planning Commission voted 6-0, recommending City Council approval.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The environmental impacts of this Project were previously reviewed in conjunction with the Euclid Mixed Use Specific Plan (File No. PSP22-001), for which the Euclid Mixed Use Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse #2023020281) (EMUSP EIR) was adopted by the City Council on August 20, 2024. The EMUSP EIR analyzed the project site with a potential 122,898 square feet of business park uses and 30,225 square feet of commercial uses. This Application introduces no new significant environmental impacts. All previously adopted mitigation measures of the EMUSP EIR are a condition of Project approval and are incorporated herein by this reference. 3636
Prepared: RM 9/24/2025 Reviewed: TG 9/24/2025 Decision: 9/24/2025 DECISION NO.: ZA25-034
FILE NO.: PADV25-003
DESCRIPTION: An Administrative Housing Element Sites Inventory Amendment request to remove a total of 128 units from the housing inventory for 5.3 acres of land located on Euclid Avenue, about 300 feet north of Edison Avenue, from Mixed Use to Business Park. Submitted by RDDC Inc. (APN: 1053-281-08)
RELATES FILES: PGPA23-003
Part I — BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS
RCCD Inc. (herein after referred to as “Applicant”) has filed an application requesting approval of an Administrative Housing Element Sites Inventory Amendment for File No. PADV25- 003, as described in the subject of this Decision (herein after referred to as “Application” or “Project”).
(1) Project Setting: The Project site for the requested removal of 128 units from the Housing Element Sites Inventory is comprised of 5.3 acres of and located on Euclid Avenue, 300 feet north of Edison Avenue, depicted in Exhibit A: Project Location Map and Exhibit B: Zoning, attached. Existing land uses, General Plan, and zoning designations on and surrounding the Project site are as follows:
Existing
Land Use
Policy Plan
Designation
Zoning
Designation
Specific Plan
Land Use
Site Vacant
Mixed Use – Great Park
(MU-Great Park);
Affordable Housing
Overlay; Chino Airport
Influence Area Overlay
Euclid Mixed Use
Specific Plan;
Affordable Housing
Overlay; CNO Overlay
Mixed Use
North Vacant, Utility Easement
Open Space – NonRecreational (OS-NR);
Chino Airport Influence
Area Overlay
Euclid Mixed Use
Specific Plan; CNO
Overlay
Open Space – NonRecreational
South Residential, Vacant,
RV storage
Mixed Use – Great Park
(MU-Great Park); Chino
Airport Influence Area
Overlay
Euclid Mixed Use
Specific Plan; CNO
Overlay
Mixed Use
East Agriculture
Mixed Use – Great Park
(MU-Great Park); Chino
Airport Influence Area
Overlay
Euclid Mixed Use
Specific Plan; CNO
Overlay
Mixed Use
303 East B Street, Ontario, California 91764 Phone: 909.395.2036 / Email: [email protected] ZONING ADMINISTRATOR DECISION: ADMINISTRATIVE
HOUSING ELEMENT SITES INVENTORY AMENDMENT
September 16, 2025
3637
Zoning Administrator Decision
File No. PADV25-003
Non-Hearing Decision
Existing
Land Use
Policy Plan
Designation
Zoning
Designation
Specific Plan
Land Use
West Commercial
(City of Chino)
Commercial General
(City of Chino)
East Chino Specific Plan
(City of Chino)
Office Commercial
(City of Chino)
(2) Project Analysis: The proposed Administrative Housing Element Sites Inventory Amendment is depicted in Exhibit C: Proposed Amendment to the Housing Element Sites Inventory. The requested changes are analyzed below:
(a) Background — The Housing Element is one of the 7 mandated elements of the General Plan, which each city and county in the State is required to adopt and periodically update. The City adopted the current Housing Element per File No. PGPA21-004 on March 1, 2022, and revised on August 16, 2022, which covers the planning period from October 15, 2021, through October 15, 2029. The Housing Element is required to identify sites that can accommodate housing units for all income categories allocated to Ontario through the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (“RHNA”). The Sites Inventory is included in Appendix B-1 and B-2 to the Housing Element and identifies specific parcels with density ranges, assumed densities, and minimum number of units that are counted towards the City’s RHNA obligation. File No. PGPA16-003, approved by City Council on June 21, 2016, allows administrative changes to the Housing Element to periodically update the inventory to:
• Remove sites that are found to be no longer suitable for the intensity assumed; and • Adjust the assumed density and/or number of units on a site on the inventory to reflect the intensity that can feasibly be achieved; and • Add sites which are now vacant or underutilized to the inventory that were not available at the time the Housing Element was adopted.
As shown in Exhibit A: Project Location Map and Exhibit B: Zoning, the Project site is located on Euclid Avenue, approximately 300 feet north of Edison Avenue, within the Euclid Mixed Use Specific Plan. The site consists of 5.3 gross acres and is currently vacant. Under the TOP 2050 Land Use Plan, the site is designated Mixed Use – Great Park with an Affordable Housing Overlay, which assumes a buildout of 128 dwelling units (including 64 Lower-Income units, 32 Moderate-Income units, and 32 Above Moderate-Income units), along with 34,630 square feet of office and 46,173 square feet of retail. The applicant proposes a General Plan Amendment to redesignate the site from Mixed Use – Great Park to Business Park, and to remove the Affordable Housing Overlay. The Project site is identified in the Housing Element Sites Inventory, and its removal requires adjustments to maintain Housing Element and RHNA compliance, as analyzed in Exhibit C: Housing Element Compliance.
(b) Proposed Change — As shown in Exhibit C, one parcel (APN: 1053-281-08) is listed as Map ID No. 2-84, which has a total RHNA obligation of 128 units (including 64 units in the Lower Income category, 32 units in the Moderate-Income category, and 32 units in the Above Moderate-Income category). The City’s total RHNA capacity is shown in Table 1: City Housing Element Sites Inventory Capacity. The City’s RHNA Lower Income housing needs inventory provides capacity for 9,135 units, exceeding the RHNA allocation of 8,926 units, with an excess capacity of 209 units. The Moderate-Income category provides capacity for 3,820 units, exceeding the RHNA allocation of 3,329 units, with an excess capacity of 491 units. The Above Moderate-Income category provides capacity for 8,990 units, exceeding the RHNA allocation of 8,599 units, with an excess capacity of 391 units. The current inventory provides an overall excess housing capacity buffer of 1,091 units.
3638
Zoning Administrator Decision
File No. PADV25-003
Non-Hearing Decision
Table 1: City Housing Element Sites Inventory Capacity
Housing Element Available
Land Inventory Lower Income ModerateIncome
Above
ModerateIncomeTotal Capacity
Existing Land Inventory 9,135 3,820 8,990 21,945
RHNA Allocation 8,926 3,329 8,599 20,854
Land Inventory in excess of
RHNA 209 491 391 1,091
The proposed removal of 128 units from the Housing Element Sites Inventory (64 units from the Lower Income category, 32 units from the Moderate-Income category, and 32 units from the above-moderate income category) will not create a deficiency in either category (as shown in Table 2). No additional sites are required to be added to the inventory, as there is an excess capacity buffer for the Lower Income and Moderate-Income category.
Table 2: Revised City Housing Element Sites Inventory Capacity Housing Element Available
Land Inventory Lower Income ModerateIncome
Above
ModerateIncomeTotal Capacity
Existing Land Inventory 9,135 3,820 8,990 21,945
Proposed Land Inventory
Reduction (64) (32) (32) (128)
Proposed Land Inventory
Increase 0 0 0 0
Proposed Land Inventory 9,071 3,788 8,958 21,817
RHNA Allocation 8,926 3,329 8,599 20,854
Land Inventory in excess of
RHNA 145 459 359 963
The revised Housing Element Sites Inventory provides capacity for 9,071 units in the Lower Income category, exceeding the RHNA allocation of 8,926 units, with an excess capacity of 145 units. The Moderate-Income category provides capacity for 3,788 units, exceeding the RHNA allocation of 3,329 units, with an excess capacity of 459 units. The Above Moderate-Income category provides capacity for 8,958 units, exceeding the RHNA allocation of 8,599 units, with an excess capacity of 359 units. The identified inventory unit count provides a revised overall total excess housing capacity buffer of 963 units.
(a) Recommendation —The removal of 128 units (64 Lower Income, 32 Moderate-Income, and 32 Above Moderate-Income) from the Housing Element Sites Inventory will not create a deficiency in any income category. Adequate sites remain to meet the City’s RHNA obligations of 8,926 Lower Income units, 3,329 Moderate-Income units, and 8,599 Above Moderate-Income units. No additional sites are required to be added to the Housing Element Sites Inventory, as the City continues to maintain excess capacity in all income categories. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the proposed amendment to remove the 128 units from the Housing Element Sites Inventory.
3639
Zoning Administrator Decision
File No. PADV25-003
Non-Hearing Decision
Part II — RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City of Ontario has received a request for an Administrative Housing Element Sites Inventory Amendment approval as described in Part I, above; and WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Decision have occurred.
Part III — THE DECISION
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Zoning Administrator of the City of Ontario as follows:
(1) All facts set forth in this Zoning Administrator Report and Decision are true and correct.
(2) Based upon the evidence presented to the Zoning Administrator, the Zoning Administrator hereby makes the following Housing Element Sites Inventory Amendment findings:
(a) The proposed amendment to the Housing Element Sites Inventory is consistent with the goals, policies, plans, and exhibits of the Vision, Policy Plan (General Plan) including the Housing Element, and City Council Priorities components of The Ontario Plan. The revised Housing Element Sites Inventory provides 9,071 units in the Lower Income category, a RHNA allocation of 8,926 units, and an excess capacity of 145 units. The Moderate-Income category provides an inventory of 3,788 units, a RHNA allocation of 3,329 units, and an excess inventory of 459 units. The Above Moderate-Income category provides an inventory of 8,958 units, a RHNA allocation of 8,599 units, and an excess of 359 units. These identified inventory unit counts establish a revised excess housing capacity buffer of 963 units; and (b) The remaining sites identified in the Housing Element are adequate to meet the requirements of the State of California Government Code Section 65583.2 and to accommodate the City’s share of the regional housing need (RHNA) pursuant to Section 65584.
With this amendment request, the RHNA obligations for each income category will continue to be adequately accommodated by the City’s RHNA obligation and the City retains sufficient capacity to meet the Lower Income and Moderate-Income RHNA obligations as follows:
Table 3: Revised Housing Element Sites Inventory Capacity Housing Element Available
Land Inventory Lower Income ModerateIncome
Above
ModerateIncomeTotal Capacity
Existing Land Inventory 9,135 3,820 8,990 21,945
Proposed Land Inventory
Reduction (64) (32) (32) (128)
Proposed Land Inventory
Increase 0 0 0 0
Proposed Land Inventory 9,071 3,788 8,958 21,817
RHNA Allocation 8,926 3,329 8,599 20,854
Land Inventory in excess of
RHNA 145 459 359 963
3640
Zoning Administrator Decision
File No. PADV25-003
Non-Hearing Decision
(c) The proposed amendment to the Housing Element Sites Inventory is compatible with adjoining sites, any physical constraint identified on the subject site, and the characteristics of the area in which the site is located. The proposed amendment to the Housing Element Sites Inventory will adjust the City’s housing sites inventory to reflect the removal of units from the subject parcel. The amendment will not create a deficiency in the City’s ability to meet its RHNA obligations, as adequate capacity remains in all income categories. The revision will not constrain future residential development opportunities elsewhere in the City nor alter the residential character of surrounding neighborhoods, since the reduction is offset by surplus capacity identified in the Housing Element; and
(d) The strict enforcement of the Housing Element Sites Inventory obligations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the development regulations contained in the City of Ontario Development Code. The revised Housing Element Sites Inventory provides an inventory of 9,071 units in the Lower Income category, a RHNA allocation of 8,926 units, and an excess capacity of 145 units. The Moderate-Income category provides an inventory of 3,788 units, a RHNA allocation of 3,329 units, and an excess inventory of 459 units. The Above Moderate-Income category provides an inventory of 8,958 units, a RHNA allocation of 8,599 units, and an excess inventory of 359 units. These identified inventory unit counts establish a revised excess housing capacity buffer of 963 units, confirming that the proposed amendment will not negatively impact the City’s ability to meet its RHNA obligations; and
(e) The strict enforcement of the Housing Element Sites Inventory obligations would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zoning district. Because the City maintains an excess inventory of 145 units within the Lower Income category and 459 units within the Moderate-Income category, the removal of the units identified in Exhibit C as Map ID No. 2-84 is warranted. This amendment will not negatively impact the City’s ability to meet its RHNA obligations, and the site should be removed from the Housing Element Sites Inventory List; and
(f) The granting of the Housing Element Sites Inventory Amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The development of the related applications and the amendment to the Housing Element Sites Inventory will be within the existing density range of both the General Plan and zoning designations and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare and will be compatible with the surrounding area.
(3) The Zoning Administrator hereby finds and determines that the potential environmental impacts of the project identified in this Decision were previously reviewed in conjunction with The Ontario Plan (File No. PGPA20-002) Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) (SCH# 2021070364) certified by City Council on August 16, 2022. This Application introduces no new significant environmental impacts not previously analyzed in the SEIR. All previously adopted mitigation measures are a condition of project approval and are incorporated herein by reference.
3641
3642
Zoning Administrator Decision
File No. PADV25-003
Non-Hearing Decision
Exhibit A: PROJECT LOCATION MAP
Map ID No. 2-84
3643
Zoning Administrator Decision
File No. PADV25-003
Non-Hearing Decision
Exhibit B: Zoning – SP (Euclid Mixed Use )
Project
Site
3644
Zoning Administrator Decision
File No. PADV25-003
Non-Hearing Decision
Exhibit C: Proposed Amendment to the
Housing Element Sites Inventory
(Proposed changes to Housing Element Sites Inventory follow this page) 3645
2-135
2-56 2-59 2-60 2-61
2-58
2-57
2-55
2-53
2-75
2-69
2-73
2-67
2-78
2-79
2-112 2-113 2-114
2-111
2-116 2-117 2-110
2-128 2-119 2-118
2-65
2-64 2-68 2-70 2-127 2-125 2-124 2-123 2-121 2-122
2-126 2-120
2-164
2-163
2-176
2-173
2-168
2-170
2-169
2-174 2-167
2-80
2-91
2-81 2-86 2-85 2-88 2-87
2-84
2-90 2-83 2-82
2-100
2-93
2-99 2-92 2-101
2-103 2-102
2-108
2-109
2-153 2-142
2-141
2-154
2-155
2-63 2-76
2-89 2-54
2-66
2-94
2-96
2-107
2-106
2-105
2-104
2-158
2-159
2-165
2-157
2-161
2-175
2-177
2-134 2-162
2-178 2-133
2-179
2-132
2-144
2-136
2-180 2-145 2-131
2-146 2-139
2-147 2-138
2-148
2-137
2-149
2-150
2-166
2-152 2-143
2-151
2-156
2-160
2-62
2-72 2-74
2-129
2-98 2-95
2-71
2-130
2-97
2-115
2-80
2-140
2-140
2-172
2-176 2-172
2-181
2-182
0 550 1,100 2,200
Ft
Housing Element
Site Inventory
Housing Element Parcels
Great Park Corridor (Page 1)
Grove Corridor (Page 1)
Euclid Corridor (Page 1)
Vineyard/Armstrong Ranch Specific Plan (Page 1)
Downtown (Page 2)
West Holt (Page 2)
East Holt (Page 2)
Old Cardenas Market (Page 2)
Ontario Center Specific Plan (Page 2)
Ontario Mills Specific Plan (Page 2)
Ontario City Boundary
MapID# See Tables B-1 & B-2 for details
Date: 1/13/2025 1
2-77
3646
1-47 1-49
1-46
1-48
PORSCHE WY
DUESENBERG
DR
CONCOURS ST
INLAND EMPIRE BL
MERCEDES
LN
HAVEN AV
MOUNTAIN
AV
ELDERBERRY AV
BENSON AV
SAN ANTONIO AV
BOULDER AV
CYPRESS AV
VESTA ST
C O
NE
F LO WER
LN
HOLT BL
0 AL
BEGONIA AV
OAKS AV
VESTA ST
GRANITE AV
B ST
BROOKS ST
HOLLOWELL ST
STONERIDGE CT
1-3
1-27
1-26
1-25
1-7 1-6
1-17
1-16
1-24
1-23
1-8 1-12
1-13
1-14
1-18 1-15
1-20 1-19
1-28
1-9
1-29 1-21
1-22
1-4
1-5
2-8 2-7
2-35
2-21
2-34
2-19
2-22
2-33
2-31 2-32
2-18
2-20
2-25
2-23
2-24
2-47
2-28
2-43
2-42 2-44 2-45
2-29 2-30
2-27
2-46
2-50
2-49
2-48
2-36
2-38
2-26
2-40
2-39
2-37
2-51
2-52
2-41
I-10 FWY E.B.
ONTARIO MI LLS PW
FOURTH ST
ONTARIO
MI LLS
DR
I-10 FWY W.B.
MILLIKEN AV
FRANKLIN AV
I-15 FWY S.B.
MALL DR
INLAND EMPIRE BL
MI LLS
CI
I-10 W/B OFFRAMP
ROCHESTER AV
I-15 1-10 INTRCH
I-10 I-15 INTRCH
I-15 I-10 INTRCH
1-2 1-1
VINE AV
FERN AV
PALM AV
LAUREL AV
C ST
D ST
NOCTA ST
D ST
ALLYN AV
BERLYN AV
VIRGINIA AV
ELMA CT
ELMA PRIVADO
NOCTA PRIVADO
GROVE AV
IMPERIAL AV
ELMA ST
E ST
HOLT BL
GLENN PL
HOLMES AV
WILLOW ST
1-32
1-41
1-34
1-36
1-38 1-35
1-39
1-40
1-30
2-12
1-31 2-11
2-14
1-42
1-43
1-33 1-37 2-13 1-45
1-44
1-50
1-51
2-4
2-5
26 HOLT BL
MONTEREY AV
MIRAMONTE AV
2-1 2-2 2-3
LAUREL AV
LOCUST ST
MAPLE ST
DE ANZA CI
FRANCIS ST
EUCLID AV
PALM AV
2-16
2-15
2-17
0 300 600 1,200
Ft
Date: 1/13/2025 2
1-55 1--53
1-54
1-52
MAIN ST
HOLT BL
EMPORIA ST
FERN AV
TRANSIT ST
PALM AV PALM AV
EMPORIA ST
TRANSIT ST
FERN AV
PALM AV
HOLT BL
MAIN ST
EMPORIA ST
TRANSIT ST
FERN AV
MAIN ST
HOLT BL
PALM AV
3647
Table B-1: Housing Element Sites Inventory - SItes Already Suitably Zoned ID Opp Area Site Address/Intersection Zip Code APN
Consolidated
Sites Current GP Current Zone
Min Density
(du/ac)
Max Density
(du/ac)
Parcel Size
(Acres) Existing Use/ Vacancy
Infrast
Available Publicly-Owned Site Status Lower Mod Above Mod Total Units Notes Table B-11-01 Downtown 315 W D ST 91762 104857601 HDR HDR-45 25 45 0.7 Parking lot Yes NO Available 9 9 0 181-02 Downtown 325 N PALM AVE 91762 104857602 HDR HDR-45 25 45 0.47 Parking lot Yes NO Available 6 6 0 121-03 West Holt 900 W HOLT BLVD 91762 101050176 HDR HDR-45 25 45 1.48 Auto sales Yes NO Available 18 18 0 371-04 West Holt 1034 W HOLT BLVD 91762 101050206 J HDR HDR-45 25 45 0.34 Auto sales Yes NO Available 4 4 0 91-05 West Holt 1020 W HOLT BLVD 91761 101050207 J HDR HDR-45 25 45 0.43 Auto sales Yes NO Available 5 5 0 111-06 West Holt 1134 W HOLT BLVD 91761 101052206 HDR HDR-45 25 45 0.67 Strip retail Yes NO Available 8 8 0 171-07 West Holt 1156 W HOLT BLVD 91762 101052217 HDR HDR-45 25 45 0.95 Auto sales Yes NO Available 12 12 0 241-08 West Holt 1206 W HOLT BLVD 91762 101054302 C HDR HDR-45 25 45 0.47 Parking lot Yes NO Available 6 6 0 121-09 West Holt W OF 1206 W HOLT BLVD 91764 101054303 HDR HDR-45 25 45 0.25 Parking Lot Yes NO Available 3 3 0 61-12 West Holt 1328 W HOLT BLVD 91761 101054310 E HDR HDR-45 25 45 0.3 Auto sales Yes NO Available 4 4 0 71-13 West Holt 1328 W HOLT BLVD 91761 101054311 E HDR HDR-45 25 45 0.28 Auto sales Yes NO Available 3 3 0 71-14 West Holt 1350 W HOLT BLVD 91762 101054313 F HDR HDR-45 25 45 0.35 Building supply Yes NO Available 4 4 0 91-15 West Holt 1360 W HOLT BLVD 91762 101054314 F HDR HDR-45 25 45 0.44 Building supply Yes NO Available 6 6 0 111-16 West Holt W OF SWC STONERIDGE CT & MOUNTAINAVE 91762 101054326 C HDR HDR-45 25 45 0.26 Parking lot Yes NO Available 3 3 0 71-17 West Holt 1203 W STONERIDGE CT 91762 101054327 C HDR HDR-45 25 45 0.42 Parking lot Yes NO Available 5 5 0 111-18 West Holt 1424 W HOLT BLVD 91761 101055204 G HDR HDR-45 25 45 0.31 Automotive Yes NO Available 4 4 0 81-19 West Holt 1426 W HOLT BLVD 91761 101055205 G HDR HDR-45 25 45 0.31 Automotive Yes NO Available 4 4 0 81-20 West Holt 1448 W HOLT BLVD 91761 101055207 H HDR HDR-45 25 45 0.31 Auto sales Yes NO Available 4 4 0 81-21 West Holt 1528 HOLT BLVD 91762 101055212 I HDR HDR-45 25 45 0.32 Retail Yes NO Available 4 4 0 81-22 West Holt 1538 HOLT BLVD 91762 101055213 I HDR HDR-45 25 45 0.32 Retail Yes NO Available 4 4 0 81-23 West Holt 120 N BENSON AVE 91762 101055216 D HDR HDR-45 25 45 0.68 Retail Yes NO Available 8 8 0 171-24 West Holt 1535 W STONERIDGE CT 91762 101055217 D HDR HDR-45 25 45 0.21 Retail Yes NO Available 3 3 0 51-25 West Holt 1420 W HOLT BLVD 91762 101055232 A HDR HDR-45 25 45 0.46 Parking lot Yes NO Available 6 6 0 121-26 West Holt 1414 W HOLT BLVD 91761 101055233 A HDR HDR-45 25 45 0.46 Building supply Yes NO Available 6 6 0 121-27 West Holt 1414 W HOLT BLVD 91762 101055234 A HDR HDR-45 25 45 0.42 Building supply Yes NO Available 5 5 0 111-28 West Holt 1502 W HOLT BLVD 91762 101055237 H HDR HDR-45 25 45 0.39 Auto sales Yes NO Available 5 5 0 101-29 West Holt 1512 W HOLT BLVD 91761 101055238 HDR HDR-45 25 45 0.56 Auto sales Yes NO Available 7 7 0 141-30 East Holt 1323 E HOLT BLVD 91764 11006104 MU-HE MU-2 14 40 0.99 Vacant Yes NO Available 11 11 0 221-31 East Holt 1207 E HOLT BLVD 91764 11006110 MU-HE MU-2 14 40 1.11 Vacant Yes NO Available 13 13 0 251-32 East Holt 1217 E HOLT BLVD 91764 11006121 MU-HE MU-2 14 40 1.19 Hotel Yes NO Available 13 13 0 271-33 East Holt 1241 E HOLT BLVD 91764 11006125 MU-HE MU-2 14 40 1.2 Hotel Yes NO Available 14 14 0 271-34 East Holt 1111 E HOLT BLVD 91761 104847115 MU-HE MU-2 14 40 0.52 Automotive / Open Storage Yes NO Available 6 6 0 121-35 East Holt 1101 E HOLT BLVD 91764 104847122 B MU-HE MU-2 14 40 0.83 Parking Lot Yes NO Available 9 9 0 191-36 East Holt 1101 E HOLT BLVD 91764 104847123 B MU-HE MU-2 14 40 0.48 Vacant Church Yes NO Available 5 5 0 111-37 East Holt 1031 E HOLT BLVD 91764 104848102 MU-HE MU-2 14 40 1.83 Automotive repair Yes NO Available 21 21 0 411-38 East Holt 1015 E HOLT BLVD 91764 104848103 MU-HE MU-2 14 40 0.78 Auto parts store Yes NO Available 9 9 0 171-39 East Holt E OF NEC HOLT BLVD & ALLYN AVE 91764 104848106 MU-HE MU-2 14 40 0.63 Vacant Yes NO Available 7 7 0 141-40 East Holt 935 E HOLT BLVD 91764 104848107 MU-HE MU-2 14 40 0.9 Independent Convenience Store Yes NO Available 10 10 0 201-41 East Holt 1025 E HOLT BLVD 91764 104848122 MU-HE MU-2 14 40 1.9 Automotive repair Yes NO Available 21 21 0 431-42 East Holt 957 E HOLT BLVD 91786 104848128 MU-HE MU-2 14 40 1.18 Vacant Yes NO Available 13 13 0 271-43 East Holt 957 E HOLT BLVD 91786 104848129 MU-HE MU-2 14 40 1.18 Vacant Yes NO Available 13 13 0 261-44 East Holt 803 E HOLT AVE 91761 104851212 MU-HE MU-2 14 40 0.61 Car Sales Yes NO Available 7 7 0 141-45 East Holt 813 E HOLT BLVD 91764 104851213 MU-HE MU-2 14 40 0.91 Laundromat / Automotive Yes NO Available 10 10 0 211-46 Ontario Center SWC CONCOURS ST & MERCEDES LN 91762 21020404 MU-OC SP See Notes See Notes 8.44 Vacant Yes NO Available 63 63 0 126 Note 11-47 Ontario Center 888 HAVEN AVE 91764 21020407 MU-OC SP See Notes See Notes 4.47 Vacant Yes NO Available 33 33 0 67 Note 11-48 Ontario Center NWC CONCOURS ST & DUESENBERG DR 91764 21053115 MU-OC SP See Notes See Notes 2.28 Vacant Yes NO Available 0 0 51 51 Note 21-49 Ontario Center NEC CONCOURS ST & DUESENBERG DR 91764 21053116 MU-OC SP See Notes See Notes 1.36 Vacant Yes NO Available 0 0 33 33 Note 21-50 East Holt* 907 E HOLT BLVD 91761 104848127 K MU-HE MU-6 14 40 0.91 Commercial Yes Yes Available 10 10 0 201-51 East Holt* 905 E HOLT BLVD 91761 104848108 K MU-HE MU-6 14 40 1.51 Vacant Yes Yes Available 18 18 0 361-52 Downtown* 201 S FERN AVE 169 104905406 L MU-DT MU-1 25 75 0.24 Vacant Yes Yes Available 4 4 0 81-53 Downtown* 325 W TRANSIT ST 91762 104905402 L MU-DT MU-1 25 75 0.46 Vacant Yes Yes Available 8 8 0 161-54 Downtown* 301 W TRANSIT ST 91762 104905403 L MU-DT MU-1 25 75 0.21 Vacant Yes Yes Available 4 4 0 81-55 Downtown* 310 W EMPORIA ST 91762 104905404 L MU-DT MU-1 25 75 0.50 Vacant Yes Yes Available 9 9 0 182-01 Downtown 111 N MIRAMONTE AVE 91764 104852414 MU-DT MU-1 25 75 0.1 Nonvacant Yes NO Available 1 1 0 3 02-02 Downtown 617 E HOLT BLVD 91764 104852415 MU-DT MU-1 25 75 0.1 Nonvacant Yes NO Available 1 1 0 3 02-03 Downtown 609 E HOLT BLVD 91764 104852416 MU-DT MU-1 25 75 0.3 Nonvacant Yes NO Available 3 3 0 62-04 East Holt* 1555 E HOLT AVE 91761 11007225 MU-HE MU-6 20 40 4.8 Nonvacant Yes NO Available 13 13 80 1062-05 East Holt* 1619 E HOLT AVE 91761 11008106 MU-HE MU-6 20 40 0.5 Nonvacant Yes NO Available 1 1 9 122-06 East Holt* 0 E HOLT BLVD 91761 11008107 MU-HE MU-6 20 40 4.5 Vacant Yes NO Available 13 14 76 1032-07 West Holt 1050 W HOLT BLVD 91762 101050208 MU-HW MU-6-AH 20 40 1.2 Nonvacant Yes NO Available 13 13 0 27 Note12-08 West Holt 1050 W HOLT BLVD 91762 101050209 MU-HW MU-6-AH 20 40 0.3 Nonvacant Yes NO Available 3 3 0 6 Note 12-11 East Holt NWC HOLT BLVD & IMPERIAL AVE 91761 11007102 MU-HE MU-6-AH 20 40 2.1 Vacant Yes NO Available 3 0 0 32-12 East Holt 1381 E HOLT BLVD 91764 11007106 MU-HE MU-6-AH 20 40 1.8 Vacant Yes NO Available 21 21 0 412-13 East Holt 1387 E HOLT BLVD 91764 11007107 MU-HE MU-6-AH 20 40 0.6 Vacant Yes NO Available 6 6 0 122-14 East Holt 1405 E HOLT BLVD 91764 11007210 MU-HE MU-6-AH 20 40 1.5 Vacant Yes NO Available 17 17 0 332-15 Old Cardenas Market N OF NEC MAPLE ST & EUCLID AVE 91762 105027201 HDR HDR-45 25 45 0.6 Vacant Yes NO Available 8 8 0 162-16 Old Cardenas Market 1652 EUCLID AVE 91761 105027220 HDR HDR-45 25 45 0.6 Vacant Yes NO Available 8 8 0 162-17 Old Cardenas Market 1714 S EUCLID AVE 91762 105028401 MU-EF MU* 20 30 2.2 Nonvacant Yes NO Available 17 17 0 332-53 Great Park Corridor E OF NEC EDISON AVE & GROVE AVE 91710 21631101 MU-GP SP-AG-AH 20 65 3.7 Agriculture Yes NO Available 45 23 23 902-54 Great Park Corridor 14049 GROVE AVE 91761 21631102 MU-GP SP-AG-AH 20 65 3.7 Agriculture Yes NO Available 46 23 23 912-55 Great Park Corridor 8270 EDISON AVE 91762 21631109 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 7.3 Agriculture Yes NO Available 79 40 40 1592-56 Great Park Corridor NWC EDISON AVE & WALKER AVE 91762 21631208 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 7.1 Agriculture Yes NO Available 78 39 39 1562-57 Great Park Corridor 8314 EDISON AVE 91761 21631209 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 3.4 Agriculture Yes NO Available 36 19 19 742-58 Great Park Corridor 8354 EDISON AVE 91761 21631210 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 3.8 Agriculture Yes NO Available 41 21 21 832-59 Great Park Corridor NEC EDISON AVE & WALKER AVE 91761 21631301 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 7.0 Vacant Yes NO Available 77 38 38 1532-60 Great Park Corridor NWC EDISON AVE & BAKER AVE 91762 21631309 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 6.9 Agriculture Yes NO Available 76 38 38 1532-61 Great Park Corridor NEC EDISON AVE & BAKER AVE 91762 21631401 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 6.8 Agriculture Yes NO Available 75 37 37 1502-62 Great Park Corridor N OF NWC EDISON AVE & VINEYARDAVE 91762 21631408 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 1.1 Agriculture Yes NO Available 12 6 6 232-63 Great Park Corridor NWC EDISON AVE & VINEYARD AVE 91762 21631409 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 9.0 Agriculture Yes NO Available 99 50 50 1992-64 Great Park Corridor 14474 GROVE AVE 91762 21632101 MU-BC SP-AG-AH 25 45 8.8 Agriculture Yes NO Available 60 31 31 1222-65 Great Park Corridor 14361 GROVE AVE 91762 21632102 MU-BC SP-AG-AH 25 45 7.5 Agriculture Yes NO Available 51 26 26 1042-66 Great Park Corridor 8185 EDISON AVE 91762 21632103 MU-GP SP-AG-AH 20 65 15.7 Agriculture Yes NO Available 190 96 96 3822-67 Great Park Corridor N OF NWC EUCALYPTUS AVE & PARCOAVE 91762 21632106 MU-BC SP-AG-AH 25 45 5.7 Agriculture Yes NO Available 40 20 20 802-68 Great Park Corridor NWC EUCALYPTUS AVE & PARCO AVE 91761 21632107 MU-BC SP-AG-AH 25 45 9.1 Agriculture Yes NO Available 64 32 32 1282-69 Great Park Corridor 8311 EDISON AVE 91762 21632108 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 15.5 Agriculture Yes NO Available 168 85 85 3382-70 Great Park Corridor NEC EUCALYPTUS AVE & PARCO AVE 91762 21632201 MU-BC SP-AG-AH 25 45 9.1 Agriculture Yes NO Available 64 32 32 1272-71 Great Park Corridor N OF NEC EUCALYPTUS AVE & PARCOAVE 91762 21632202 MU-BC SP-AG-AH 25 45 3.1 Agriculture Yes NO Available 21 11 11 432-72 Great Park Corridor S OF SEC EDISON AVE & PARCO AVE 91762 21632203 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 2.9 Agriculture Yes NO Available 32 16 16 632-73 Great Park Corridor 8335 EDISON AVE 91761 21632204 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 9.1 Agriculture Yes NO Available 99 50 50 1992-74 Great Park Corridor S OF SEC EDISON AVE & WALKER AVE 91762 21632303 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 3.0 Agriculture Yes NO Available 33 17 17 672-75 Great Park Corridor 8535 EDISON 0 91710 21632304 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 8.9 Agriculture Yes NO Available 98 49 49 1952-76 Great Park Corridor NEC EDISON AVE & VINEYARD AVE 91762 21818101 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 9.0 Agriculture Yes NO Available 99 50 50 1992-77 Great Park Corridor N OF NEC EDISON AVE & VINEYARDAVE 91762 21818102 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 4.0 Agriculture Yes NO Available 45 22 22 892-78 Great Park Corridor 9064 EDISON AVE 91762 21818111 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 5.3 Agriculture Yes NO Available 58 29 29 1172-79 Great Park Corridor 9060 EDISON AVE 91762 21818112 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 7.3 Agriculture Yes NO Available 79 40 40 1592-80 Great Park Corridor 7330 EDISON AVE 91710 105320101 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 23.5 Agriculture Yes NO Available 239 138 138 5152-81 Great Park Corridor 7244 EDISON AVE 91761 105328101 MU-GP SP-AG-AH 20 65 8.4 Agriculture Yes NO Available 103 51 51 2052-82 Great Park Corridor 7218 EDISON AVE 91761 105328102 MU-GP SP-AG-AH 20 65 2.1 Open storage Yes NO Available 25 13 13 50 3648
Table B-1: Housing Element Sites Inventory - SItes Already Suitably Zoned ID Opp Area Site Address/Intersection Zip Code APN
Consolidated
Sites Current GP Current Zone
Min Density
(du/ac)
Max Density
(du/ac)
Parcel Size
(Acres) Existing Use/ Vacancy
Infrast
Available Publicly-Owned Site Status Lower Mod Above Mod Total Units Notes 2-83 Great Park Corridor NWC EDISON AVE & EUCLID AVE 91762 105328103 MU-GP SP-AG-AH 20 65 2.7 Vacant w/concrete pad &fence Yes NO Available 33 17 17 672-84 Great Park Corridor N OF NWC EDISON AVE & EUCLID AVE 91762 105328108 MU-GP SP-AG-AH 20 65 5.2 Agriculture Yes NO Available 64 32 32 1282-85 Great Park Corridor NWC EDISON AVE & BON VIEW AVE 91762 105330101 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 7.9 Agriculture Yes NO Available 87 43 43 1732-86 Great Park Corridor NWC EDISON AVE & CAMPUS AVE 91761 105330102 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 8.0 Agriculture Yes NO Available 88 44 44 1772-87 Great Park Corridor NWC EDISON AVE & CUCAMONGA AVE 91761 105331101 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 7.8 Agriculture Yes NO Available 86 43 43 1712-88 Great Park Corridor 13905 BON VIEW AVE 91710 105331102 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 7.8 Agriculture Yes NO Available 86 43 43 1712-89 Great Park Corridor 14050 GROVE AVE 91761 105332101 MU-GP SP-AG-AH 20 65 7.1 Open storage Yes NO Available 87 44 44 1752-90 Great Park Corridor 7914 EDISON AVE 91761 105332102 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 4.4 Agriculture Yes NO Available 48 24 24 962-91 Great Park Corridor N OF NEC EDISON AVE & CUCAMONGAAVE 91761 105332103 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 3.3 Agriculture Yes NO Available 37 18 18 742-92 Great Park Corridor SEC EDISON AVE & CUCAMONGA AVE 91761 105333101 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 7.6 Agriculture Yes NO Available 84 42 42 1682-93 Great Park Corridor E OF NEC EDISON AVE & CUCAMONGAAVE 91761 105333103 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 1.1 Agriculture Yes NO Available 12 6 6 252-94 Great Park Corridor 8061 EDISON AVE 91710 105333104 MU-GP SP-AG-AH 20 65 8.5 Agriculture Yes NO Available 104 52 52 2082-95 Great Park Corridor S OF SEC EDISON AVE & CUCAMONGAAVE 91761 105334101 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 3.3 Agriculture Yes NO Available 37 18 18 742-96 Great Park Corridor S OF SWC EDISON AVE & GROVE AVE 91761 105334102 MU-GP SP-AG-AH 20 65 5.6 Agriculture Yes NO Available 69 34 34 1382-97 Great Park Corridor 14213 BON VIEW AVE 91761 105335101 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 3.0 Agriculture Yes NO Available 31 16 16 632-98 Great Park Corridor S OF SWC EDISON AVE & CUCAMONGAAVE 91761 105335102 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 3.1 Agriculture Yes NO Available 34 17 17 672-99 Great Park Corridor 7721 EDISON AVE 91761 105336101 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 9.0 Agriculture Yes NO Available 98 50 50 1972-100 Great Park Corridor SWC EDISON AVE & CUCAMONGA AVE 91761 105336102 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 9.0 Agriculture Yes NO Available 98 49 49 1972-101 Great Park Corridor 7587 EDISON AVE 91710 105337101 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 23.6 Agriculture Yes NO Available 258 130 130 5172-102 Great Park Corridor 7325 EDISON AVE 91761 105339101 MU-GP SP-AG-AH 20 65 36.5 Agriculture Yes NO Available 446 223 223 8922-103 Great Park Corridor 7225 EDISON AVE 91761 105341101 MU-GP SP-AG-AH 20 65 18.3 Agriculture Yes NO Available 225 112 112 4502-104 Great Park Corridor 14251 EUCLID AVE 91761 105342101 MU-GP SP-AG-AH 20 65 6.4 Agriculture Yes NO Available 79 39 39 1582-105 Great Park Corridor 14211 S EUCLID 0 91761 105342102 MU-GP SP-AG-AH 20 65 5.4 Open storage Yes NO Available 66 33 33 1332-106 Great Park Corridor 14187 EUCLID AVE 91761 105342104 MU-GP SP-AG-AH 20 65 5.7 Agriculture Yes NO Available 70 35 35 1402-107 Great Park Corridor S OF SEC EDISON AVE & EUCLID AVE 91761 105342107 MU-GP SP-AG-AH 20 65 0.6 Open storage Yes NO Available 7 4 4 152-108 Great Park Corridor 14107 EUCLID AVE 91761 105342108 MU-GP SP-AG-AH 20 65 1.2 Truck rental /open storage Yes NO Available 14 7 7 292-109 Great Park Corridor 7145 EDISON AVE 91761 105342109 MU-GP SP-AG-AH 20 65 3.5 Open storage Yes NO Available 43 22 22 872-110 Great Park Corridor 14393 S EUCLID AVE 91761 105351101 MU-GP SP-AG-AH 20 65 5.9 Truck wash Yes NO Available 73 36 36 1452-111 Great Park Corridor N OF NEC EUCALYPTUS AVE & EDISONAVE 91762 105351105 MU-GP SP-AG-AH 20 65 5.8 Agriculture Yes NO Available 72 36 36 1432-112 Great Park Corridor N OF NWC EUCALYPTUS AVE &SULTANA AVE 91762 105351106 MU-GP SP-AG-AH 20 65 9.5 Agriculture Yes NO Available 116 58 58 2332-113 Great Park Corridor 14389 SULTANA AVE 91710 105352101 MU-GP SP-AG-AH 20 65 9.5 Agriculture Yes NO Available 115 58 58 2322-114 Great Park Corridor N OF NWC EUCALYPTUS AVE &CAMPUS AVE 91762 105352102 MU-GP SP-AG-AH 20 65 9.4 Agriculture Yes NO Available 115 57 57 2292-115 Great Park Corridor N OF NEC EUCALYPTUS AVE & CAMPUSAVE 91762 105353101 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 3.0 Agriculture Yes NO Available 33 17 17 662-116 Great Park Corridor 14366 BON VIEW AVE 91710 105353104 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 2.9 Agriculture Yes NO Available 32 16 16 642-117 Great Park Corridor 14450 BON VIEW AVE 91710 105354101 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 5.5 Agriculture Yes NO Available 61 30 30 1212-118 Great Park Corridor 14400 S GROVE AVE 91762 105355101 MU-BC SP-AG-AH 25 45 26.7 Agriculture Yes NO Available 187 93 93 3732-119 Great Park Corridor 14451 BON VIEW AVE 91761 105357101 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 9.1 Agriculture Yes NO Available 99 50 50 1992-120 Great Park Corridor NEC EUCALYPTUS AVE & BON VIEWAVE 91710 105357102 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 9.1 Agriculture Yes NO Available 100 50 50 2002-121 Great Park Corridor 7556 EUCALYPTUS AVE 91710 105358103 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 9.1 Agriculture Yes NO Available 100 50 50 2012-122 Great Park Corridor 14330 BON VIEW 0 91761 105358104 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 9.0 Agriculture Yes NO Available 98 50 50 1982-123 Great Park Corridor 7511 EUCALYPTUS AVE 91762 105359101 MU-GP SP-AG-AH 20 65 9.2 Agriculture Yes NO Available 110 56 56 2232-124 Great Park Corridor 7388 EUCALYPTUS AVE 91710 105359102 MU-GP SP-AG-AH 20 65 9.0 Agriculture Yes NO Available 109 55 55 2202-125 Great Park Corridor 7280 EUCALYPTUS 0 91761 105360101 MU-GP SP-AG-AH 20 65 9.0 Agriculture Yes NO Available 111 55 55 2212-126 Great Park Corridor NEC EUCALYPTUS AVE & EDISON AVE 91761 105360102 MU-GP SP-AG-AH 20 65 5.6 Agriculture Yes NO Available 68 34 34 1372-127 Great Park Corridor 14437 EUCLID AVE 91761 105360103 MU-GP SP-AG-AH 20 65 2.8 Agriculture Yes NO Available 35 17 17 692-128 Great Park Corridor 14411 EUCLID AVE 91761 105360104 MU-GP SP-AG-AH 20 65 3.3 Truck wash Yes NO Available 41 20 20 822-129 Great Park Corridor 14350 WALKER AVE 91761 21632210a MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 11.8 Agriculture Yes NO Available 129 65 65 2592-130 Great Park Corridor 14350 WALKER AVE 91761 21632210b MU-BC SP-AG-AH 25 45 11.8 Agriculture Yes NO Available 83 41 41 1652-131 Grove Corridor 8146 CHINO AVE 91710 21617101 MU-GR SP-AG-AH 20 65 9.1 Agriculture Yes NO Available 51 0 155 2062-132 Grove Corridor N OF NEC CHINO AVE & GROVE AVE 91761 21617102 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 4.8 Agriculture Yes NO Available 26 0 79 1052-133 Grove Corridor S OF SEC RIVERSIDE DR & GROVE AVE 91761 21617103 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 9.5 Agriculture Yes NO Available 52 0 157 2092-134 Grove Corridor SWC RIVERSIDE DR & PARCO AVE 91761 21617105 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 9.2 Agriculture Yes NO Available 50 0 151 2022-135 Grove Corridor 0 COMET AVE 91761 21617106 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 9.6 Agriculture Yes NO Available 53 0 159 2122-136 Grove Corridor N OF NEC CHINO AVE & GROVE AVE 91761 21617111 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 4.8 Agriculture Yes NO Available 26 0 79 1052-137 Grove Corridor 13605 GROVE AVE 91761 21621101 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 8.9 Open storage Yes NO Available 48 0 147 1952-138 Grove Corridor 13403 GROVE AVE 91761 21621104 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 9.5 Agriculture Yes NO Available 52 0 157 2092-139 Grove Corridor 8113 CHINO AVE 91761 21621105 MU-GR SP-AG-AH 20 65 9.0 Agriculture Yes NO Available 51 0 153 2042-140 Grove Corridor 13519 S GROVE AVE 91761 21621124 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 6.8 Open storage Yes NO Available 37 0 112 1492-141 Grove Corridor N OF NEC EDISON AVE & GROVE AVE 91761 21631103 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 8.6 Agriculture Yes NO Available 76 0 114 1902-142 Grove Corridor 13817 GROVE AVE 91761 21631104 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 9.5 Agriculture Yes NO Available 84 0 126 2092-143 Grove Corridor 13715 GROVE AVE 91761 21631105 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 9.1 Agriculture Yes NO Available 80 0 120 1992-144 Grove Corridor N OF NWC CHINO AVE & GROVE AVE 91761 105217102 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 9.5 Agriculture Yes NO Available 52 0 157 2092-145 Grove Corridor 8074 CHINO AVE 91761 105218101 MU-GR SP-AG-AH 20 65 8.9 Agriculture Yes NO Available 50 0 153 2022-146 Grove Corridor 8089 CHINO AVE 91761 105246103 MU-GR SP-AG-AH 20 65 9.0 Agriculture Yes NO Available 50 0 153 2042-147 Grove Corridor S OF SEC CHINO AVE & GROVE AVE 91761 105247102 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 9.5 Vacant Yes NO Available 52 0 157 2092-148 Grove Corridor 13524 S GROVE AVE 91762 105248102 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 6.9 Agriculture &open storage Yes NO Available 38 0 114 1532-149 Grove Corridor 13608 GROVE AVE 91762 105249105 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 4.4 Open storage Yes NO Available 23 0 73 962-150 Grove Corridor 8010 SCHAEFER AVE 91761 105249106 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 4.2 Open storage Yes NO Available 22 0 70 922-151 Grove Corridor 8025 E SCHAEFER AVE 91710 105315104 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 4.6 Open storage Yes NO Available 41 0 61 1022-152 Grove Corridor 8087 E SCHAEFER AVE 91710 105315105 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 3.9 Open storage Yes NO Available 35 0 52 862-153 Grove Corridor 13814 GROVE AVE 91710 105316102 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 9.5 Building supply Yes NO Available 84 0 125 2092-154 Grove Corridor 13908 GROVE AVE 91710 105317103 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 4.3 Open storage Yes NO Available 38 0 56 942-155 Grove Corridor 13960 GROVE AVE 91762 105317105 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 3.6 Agriculture Yes NO Available 32 0 48 792-156 Euclid Corridor 7247 RIVERSIDE DR 91761 105207105 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 1.9 Agriculture Yes NO Available 8 0 31 402-157 Euclid Corridor SEC RIVERSIDE DR & EUCLIDE AVE 91761 105207107 MU-ER SP-AG-AH 20 75 15.0 Agriculture Yes NO Available 98 0 295 3932-158 Euclid Corridor E OF SEC RIVERSIDE DR & EUCLIDE AVE 91761 105207108 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 7.3 Agriculture Yes NO Available 40 0 121 1612-159 Euclid Corridor E OF SEC RIVERSIDE DR & EUCLIDE AVE 91761 105207109 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 4.6 Agriculture Yes NO Available 25 0 76 1012-160 Euclid Corridor 7297 RIVERSIDE DR 91761 105207110 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 2.3 Agriculture Yes NO Available 11 0 38 492-161 Euclid Corridor S OF SWC RIVERSIDE DR & SULTANAAVE 91761 105208104 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 9.5 Agriculture Yes NO Available 52 0 157 2092-162 Euclid Corridor 7325 RIVERSIDE DR 91761 105210101 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 8.8 Parking, vacant
field w/ unused
ag bldg. Yes NO Available 43 0 145 189
2-163 Euclid Corridor 7192 CHINO AVE 91762 105226101 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 5.1 Agriculture Yes NO Available 28 0 84 1122-164 Euclid Corridor N OF NEC CHINO AVE & EUCLID AVE 91762 105226102 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 5.8 Agriculture Yes NO Available 32 0 96 1282-165 Euclid Corridor 13165 EUCLID AVE 91762 105226106 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 11.6 Agriculture Yes NO Available 64 0 192 2562-166 Euclid Corridor 13647 EUCLID AVE 91762 105238101 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 15.7 Agriculture Yes NO Available 86 0 258 3442-167 Euclid Corridor N OF NEC SCHAEFER 91762 105238102 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 1.0 Agriculture Yes NO Available 4 0 16 202-168 Euclid Corridor 13583 EUCLID AVE 91762 105238104 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 4.0 Vacant Yes NO Available 22 0 66 872-169 Euclid Corridor 13573 EUCLID AVE 91762 105238105 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 0.6 Agriculture Yes NO Available 4 0 11 142-170 Euclid Corridor 13555 EUCLID AVE 91762 105238106 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 0.7 Agriculture Yes NO Available 3 0 12 152-171 Euclid Corridor 13545 EUCLID AVE 91762 105238108 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 0.8 Building supply Yes NO Available 4 0 13 182-172 Euclid Corridor 7220 CHINO AVE 91761 105238110 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 14.8 Agriculture Yes NO Available 81 0 244 3252-173 Euclid Corridor N OF NWC SCHAEFER 91762 105238111 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 6.3 Vacant Yes NO Available 35 0 105 1402-174 Euclid Corridor N OF NWC SCHAEFER 91762 105238112 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 2.8 Agriculture Yes NO Available 16 0 47 622-175 Euclid Corridor 13525 S EUCLID AVE 91762 105238113 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 1.4 Veterinarian Yes NO Available 7 0 22 302-176 Euclid Corridor 7110 CHINO AVE 91762 105238114 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 11.3 Agriculture Yes NO Available 61 0 186 2472-177 Euclid Corridor 13529 EUCLID AVE 91762 105238116 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 0.9 Auto rentals Yes NO Available 5 0 15 202-178 Vineyard / Armstrong
Ranch Specific Plan S OF SWC RIVERSIDE DR & VINEYARDAVE 91761 21617406 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 9.5 Agriculture Yes NO Available 52 0 157 209 2-179
Vineyard / Armstrong
Ranch Specific Plan N OF NWC CHINO AVE & VINEYARDAVE 91761 21617407 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 9.5 Agriculture Yes NO Available 52 0 157 209 2-180
Vineyard / Armstrong
Ranch Specific Plan NWC CHINO AVE & VINEYARD AVE 91761 21617408 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 9.1 Agriculture Yes NO Available 50 0 151 201 3649
Table B-1: Housing Element Sites Inventory - SItes Already Suitably Zoned ID Opp Area Site Address/Intersection Zip Code APN
Consolidated
Sites Current GP Current Zone
Min Density
(du/ac)
Max Density
(du/ac)
Parcel Size
(Acres) Existing Use/ Vacancy
Infrast
Available Publicly-Owned Site Status Lower Mod Above Mod Total Units Notes 2-181
Vineyard / Armstrong
Ranch Specific Plan*
SWC SCHAEFER & VINEYARDAVE 91761 21818115 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 16.3 Agriculture Yes NO Available 179 89 89 358 2-182
Vineyard / Armstrong
Ranch Specific Plan*
S OF SWC SCHAEFER & VINEYARDAVE 91761 21818102 MDR SP-AG-AH 20 30 3.0 Agriculture Yes NO Available 33 16 16 66 3650
Table B-2: Housing Element Sites Inventory - Candidate Sites to be Rezoned Map ID Opportunity Area Site Address/Intersection 5 Digit APN Very Low Low Moderate Above Moderate Parcel Size Current GP Current Zone Proposed Proposed Zoning Density Density4 Total Vacant/ Description of Notes2-18 Ontario Mills Specific Plan 1050 N ONTARIO MILLS DR 91764 23801402 6 4 5 5 1.3 MU-OM SP MU-OM SP - City to ammend California Commerce Center NorthSpecific Plan (The Mills) 25 85 20.5 Nonvacant Automotive small outparcel: Car Wash 2-19 Ontario Mills Specific Plan 990 N ONTARIO MILLS DR 91764 23801403 9 5 7 7 1.8 MU-OM SP MU-OM SP - City to ammend California Commerce Center NorthSpecific Plan (The Mills) 25 85 28.9 Nonvacant Restaurant small outparcel: Jamba Juice,Mantra Indian
2-20 Ontario Mills Specific Plan 960 N ONTARIO MILLS DR 91764 23801404 6 4 5 5 1.3 MU-OM SP MU-OM SP - City to ammend California Commerce Center NorthSpecific Plan (The Mills) 25 85 20.5 Nonvacant Restaurant small outparcel: Starbucks,Noodle World Jr, Donut Shop
2-21 Ontario Mills Specific Plan 4900 E FOURTH ST 91764 23801405 94 55 74 74 18.6 MU-OM SP MU-OM SP - City to ammend California Commerce Center NorthSpecific Plan (The Mills) 25 85 297.9 Nonvacant Movie theater large outparcel: Regal Edwards 2-22 Ontario Mills Specific Plan 980 N ONTARIO MILLS DR 91764 23801406 6 4 5 5 1.2 MU-OM SP MU-OM SP - City to ammend California Commerce Center NorthSpecific Plan (The Mills) 25 85 19.9 Nonvacant Restaurant small outparcel: Rubio's,Fishbone, Corner Deli
2-23 Ontario Mills Specific Plan 880 N ROCHESTER AVE 91764 23801407 7 4 5 5 1.3 MU-OM SP MU-OM SP - City to ammend California Commerce Center NorthSpecific Plan (The Mills) 25 85 20.7 Nonvacant Retail small outparcel: Car stereo store 2-24 Ontario Mills Specific Plan 4421 ONTARIO MILLS PKWY 91764 23801410 17 10 13 13 3.3 MU-OM SP MU-OM SP - City to ammend California Commerce Center NorthSpecific Plan (The Mills) 25 85 53.3 Nonvacant Retail small outparcel: The Love Store(adult entertainment)
2-25 Ontario Mills Specific Plan 950 N ONTARIO MILLS DR 91764 23801418 7 4 5 5 1.4 MU-OM SP MU-OM SP - City to ammend California Commerce Center NorthSpecific Plan (The Mills) 25 85 21.9 Nonvacant Restaurant small outparcel: HeroesRestaurant and Brewhouse
2-26 Ontario Mills Specific Plan 4549 MILLS CIR 91764 23801419 74 43 59 59 14.7 MU-OM SP MU-OM SP - City to ammend California Commerce Center NorthSpecific Plan (The Mills) 25 85 234.7 Nonvacant Movie theater &mall parking lot AMC Ontario Mills 30
2-27 Ontario Mills Specific Plan 4364 E MILLS CIR 91764 23801420 4 2 3 3 0.8 MU-OM SP MU-OM SP - City to ammend California Commerce Center NorthSpecific Plan (The Mills) 25 85 13.0 Nonvacant Retail small outparcel: La-Z Boy 2-28 Ontario Mills Specific Plan 4340 MILLS CIRCLE DR 91764 23801423 3 2 3 3 0.7 MU-OM SP MU-OM SP - City to ammend California Commerce Center NorthSpecific Plan (The Mills) 25 85 10.4 Nonvacant Restaurant small outparcel: Del Taco 2-29 Ontario Mills Specific Plan 4453 MILLS CIRCLE CIR 91764 23801428 4 2 3 3 0.8 MU-OM SP MU-OM SP - City to ammend California Commerce Center NorthSpecific Plan (The Mills) 25 85 13.4 Nonvacant Restaurant small outparcel: Carls Jr 2-30 Ontario Mills Specific Plan 4485 MILLS CIRCLE DR 91764 23801429 7 4 6 6 1.4 MU-OM SP MU-OM SP - City to ammend California Commerce Center NorthSpecific Plan (The Mills) 25 85 23.0 Nonvacant Restaurant small outparcel: Krispy Kreme 2-31 Ontario Mills Specific Plan 4551 EAST MILLS CIRCLE 0 91764 23801430 10 6 8 8 1.9 MU-OM SP MU-OM SP - City to ammend California Commerce Center NorthSpecific Plan (The Mills) 25 85 30.7 Nonvacant Restaurant small outparcel: Chevy's (vacant?) 2-32 Ontario Mills Specific Plan 4567 MILLS CIR 91764 23801431 3 2 2 2 0.6 MU-OM SP MU-OM SP - City to ammend California Commerce Center NorthSpecific Plan (The Mills) 25 85 9.6 Nonvacant Automotive small outparcel: Jiffy Lube 2-33 Ontario Mills Specific Plan 4583 MILLS CIR 91764 23801432 4 2 3 3 0.8 MU-OM SP MU-OM SP - City to ammend California Commerce Center NorthSpecific Plan (The Mills) 25 85 12.6 Nonvacant Automotive small outparcel: Tire sales 2-34 Ontario Mills Specific Plan 4605 MILLS CIR 91764 23801433 4 2 3 3 0.7 MU-OM SP MU-OM SP - City to ammend California Commerce Center NorthSpecific Plan (The Mills) 25 85 11.9 Nonvacant Restaurant small outparcel: Wienerschnitzel 2-35 Ontario Mills Specific Plan 4649 ONTARIO MILLS DR 91764 23801434 5 3 4 4 0.9 MU-OM SP MU-OM SP - City to ammend California Commerce Center NorthSpecific Plan (The Mills) 25 85 14.3 Nonvacant Restaurant small outparcel: Burger King 2-36 Ontario Mills Specific Plan 1 E MILLS CIR 91764 23801436 486 285 385 385 96.3 MU-OM SP MU-OM SP - City to ammend California Commerce Center NorthSpecific Plan (The Mills) 25 85 1,541.4 Nonvacant Ontario MillsMall & parkinglot Mall
2-37 Ontario Mills Specific Plan 4534 MILLS CIR 91764 23801437 6 4 5 5 1.2 MU-OM SP MU-OM SP - City to ammend California Commerce Center NorthSpecific Plan (The Mills) 25 85 19.3 Nonvacant Ontario MillsMall & parkinglot The Children's Place
2-38 Ontario Mills Specific Plan 4449 MILLS CIR 91764 23801438 7 4 5 5 1.4 MU-OM SP MU-OM SP - City to ammend California Commerce Center NorthSpecific Plan (The Mills) 25 85 21.9 Nonvacant Ontario MillsMall & parkinglot Sketchers Factory Outlet 2-39 Ontario Mills Specific Plan 1 MILLS CIR 91764 23801439 6 3 5 5 1.1 MU-OM SP MU-OM SP - City to ammend California Commerce Center NorthSpecific Plan (The Mills) 25 85 18.4 Nonvacant Ontario MillsMall & parkinglot Mall
2-40 Ontario Mills Specific Plan 4380 MILLS CIR 91764 23801440 9 5 7 7 1.7 MU-OM SP MU-OM SP - City to ammend California Commerce Center NorthSpecific Plan (The Mills) 25 85 27.7 Nonvacant Ontario MillsMall & parkinglot Off Broadway Shoe Warehouse 2-41 Ontario Mills Specific Plan 4380 MILLS CIR 91764 23801441 2 1 1 1 0.3 MU-OM SP MU-OM SP - City to ammend California Commerce Center NorthSpecific Plan (The Mills) 25 85 4.9 Nonvacant Ontario MillsMall & parkinglot Off Broadway Shoe Warehouse 2-42 Ontario Mills Specific Plan 4423 EAST MILLS CIRCLE 0 91764 23801445 7 4 6 6 1.4 MU-OM SP MU-OM SP - City to ammend California Commerce Center NorthSpecific Plan (The Mills) 25 85 22.0 Nonvacant Restaurant small outparcel: Culichi TownMexican Restaurant
2-43 Ontario Mills Specific Plan 4320 MILLS CIR 91764 23801446 15 9 12 12 2.9 MU-OM SP MU-OM SP - City to ammend California Commerce Center NorthSpecific Plan (The Mills) 25 85 47.0 Nonvacant Retail Insurance Svcs, Savage Café, 2-44 Ontario Mills Specific Plan 4403 E MILLS CIR 91764 23801454 12 7 10 10 2.4 MU-OM SP MU-OM SP - City to ammend California Commerce Center NorthSpecific Plan (The Mills) 25 85 39.1 Nonvacant Restaurant small outparcel: Olive Garden 2-45 Ontario Mills Specific Plan 4413 E MILLS CIR 91764 23801455 12 7 10 10 2.4 MU-OM SP MU-OM SP - City to ammend California Commerce Center NorthSpecific Plan (The Mills) 25 85 38.4 Nonvacant Restaurant small outparcel: Red Lobster 2-46 Ontario Mills Specific Plan 4351 ONTARIO MILLS PKWY 91761 23804113 5 3 4 4 1 MU-OM SP MU-OM SP - City to ammend California Commerce Center NorthSpecific Plan (The Mills) 25 85 16.1 Nonvacant Restaurant small outparcel: Jack in the Box 2-47 Ontario Mills Specific Plan 4371 ONTARIO MILLS PKWY 91761 23804127 5 3 4 4 1 MU-OM SP MU-OM SP - City to ammend California Commerce Center NorthSpecific Plan (The Mills) 25 85 16.4 Nonvacant Restaurant small outparcel: Taco Bell 2-48 Ontario Mills Specific Plan 4400 ONTARIO MILLS PKWY 91761 23804129 13 8 10 10 2.6 MU-OM SP MU-OM SP - City to ammend California Commerce Center NorthSpecific Plan (The Mills) 25 85 41.1 Nonvacant Retail large outparcel: PerformanceBicylce, David's Bridal
2-49 Ontario Mills Specific Plan 4440 ONTARIO MILLS PKWY 91761 23804130 78 46 62 62 15.4 MU-OM SP MU-OM SP - City to ammend California Commerce Center NorthSpecific Plan (The Mills) 25 85 246.2 Nonvacant Retail Scandinavian Furniture Outlet 2-50 Ontario Mills Specific Plan ONTARIO MILLS PKWY & INLANDEMPIRE BLVD (T-INTERSECTION) 91764 23804132 23 13 18 18 4.5 MU-OM SP MU-OM SP - City to ammend California Commerce Center NorthSpecific Plan (The Mills) 25 85 72.5 Nonvacant Retail large outparcel: Big Box ParkingLot
2-51 Ontario Mills Specific Plan 4750 MILLS CIR 91764 23826101 24 14 19 19 4.8 MU-OM SP MU-OM SP - City to ammend California Commerce Center NorthSpecific Plan (The Mills) 25 85 76.0 Nonvacant Ontario MillsMall & parkinglot Nordstrom Rack
2-52 Ontario Mills Specific Plan 4449 MILLS CIR 91764 23826102 7 4 6 6 1.4 MU-OM SP MU-OM SP - City to ammend California Commerce Center NorthSpecific Plan (The Mills) 25 85 22.7 Nonvacant Ontario MillsMall & parkinglot Sketchers Factory Outlet 3651
Case Planner: Edmelynne V. Hutter, AICP Hearing Body Date Decision Action Planning Director
Approval:
DAB N/A N/A N/A
PC 9/23/25 Recommend
Submittal Date: 10/26/2023 CC 11/4/2025 Final
FILE NO: PGPA23-003
SUBJECT: A General Plan Amendment to amend The Ontario Plan 2050 Policy Plan (General Plan) Land Use Map to change the land use designation of approximately 5.3 acres of land located on Euclid Avenue, about 300 feet north of Edison Avenue, from Mixed Use to Business Park. Submitted by RDDC Inc.
PROPERTY OWNER: RCCD Inc.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the Planning Commission consider and adopt a Resolution recommending the City Council approve File No. PGPA23-003, pursuant to the facts and reasons contained in the staff report and attached Resolution, and subject to the conditions of approval appended to the attached Resolution as Attachment A.
BACKGROUND: On January 27, 2010, the Ontario City Council certified The Ontario Plan Environmental Impact Report in conjunction with File No. PGPA06-001 (City Council Resolution No. 2010-006), and on August 16, 2022, the Ontario City Council certified The Ontario Plan 2050 Update Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) in conjunction with The Ontario Plan 2050 Update (TOP 2050; File No. PGPA20-002). TOP 2050 and the associated Environmental Impact Report analyzed the Project site and established guidelines for development, including but not limited to, general land use (Mixed Use – Great Park; 10 percent office, 20 percent retail, 70 percent residential), maximum FAR (1.5 Office FAR, 1.0 Commercial FAR), and 14.0 to 65.0 du/ac residential density range. The SEIR designated areas north of the Project site as Business Park (0.6 FAR) and Open Space – Non-Recreation.
The Project site is located within the Euclid Mixed Use Specific Plan (File No. PSP22-001), which was approved by the City Council on September 3, 2024, establishing land use designations consistent with The Ontario Plan 2050 (TOP 2050), development standards, and infrastructure requirements for future development of business park and mixed use developments. The associated Euclid Mixed Use Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (State Clearing House No. 2023020281) was certified by the City Council on August 20, 2024.
The Project site is within Planning Area 3A of the Euclid Mixed Use Specific Plan and is currently vacant.
303 East B Street, Ontario, California 91764 Phone: 909.395.2036 / Email: [email protected]
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT
September 23, 2025
Approval
3652
Planning Commission Agenda Report
File No.: PGPA23-003
September 23, 2025