Discussion: The project will be subject to the City’s Noise Element and Noise Ordinance1, 5. Construction of the project will result in short term, temporary increases in ambient noise during the daytime. Since standard conditions limit the hours of construction from 7 am to 7 pm and excludes construction on Sundays and Federal Holidays, the project is not expected to result in a significant noise impact resulting from construction noise.
A Noise analysis (Attachment 8) has been prepared for Parcel 1 “Stravinski” and indicates as a result of the development, noise levels could increase for the residence to the north of the project site by up to 3dB. The study recognizes that the adjacent residential property is located in the County, and as the County Municipal Code limits increases to 1 dB or less, the project noise emission from the north side of the Stravinski development would require mitigation to reduce impacts to be less than significant. To address this, a mitigation measure has been added to require a noise wall or berm of at least 7 feet in height be placed along the north property line (for Parcel 1) and extend a minimum of 210 feet westward, from Airport Road, along the project’s northern property line. The design feature will limit the noise increase to 1 dB or less.
Consistent with the City’s Noise Element, with the mitigation proposed, the sound level at the receiving house would be 58.3 dBA, whereas the standard would allow up to 60 dBA which also includes ambient background noise. Since the sound level is within the allotted average noise level, the project’s impacts are reduced to less than significant during operational stages.
Although a noise analysis was not prepared for Parcel 2 “Daou”, the same mitigation of having a sound wall or berm up to 7 feet in height will be applied to the westerly property boundary to mitigate for noise emissions affecting the residence adjacent to and west of Parcel 2. Since the crush pad and the main operations are located between the Daou building and Stravinski building, there will only be minimal back of house noise anticipated near the westerly property line closest to where the house is located. With the 7 foot noise barrier in place, the project would result in less than significant impacts to the operations of the Daou facility. b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels?
Discussion: The levels of groundborne noise and vibration generated by project construction would be low, and noise would only occur during daytime hours of construction and would cease upon completion of the project. Therefore, impacts from groundborne vibrations are considered to be less than significant.
c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
Discussion: The project site is within Airport Safety Zone 5, the Traffic Pattern Zone4. Indoor manufacturing and warehousing uses are compatible in Zone 5. Noise contours included in the 2007 Paso Robles Airport Land Use Plan indicate the site is outside of the nearest mapped noise contours. Although some noise from airport operations is anticipated, because the project is outside of the noise sensitive areas, no significant noise impact is expected.
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact Source
XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project:
a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new
homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example,
through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
1 b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
1 Discussion (a and b):
The project will not induce population growth, displace substantial housing or people. Although the existing single-family residence will be demolished, the City’s General Plan anticipates redevelopment of this site to a more intense use, such as what is proposed.
Attachment 6
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact Source
XV. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project:
a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered
governmental facilities, need for new or physically
altered governmental facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response
times, or other performance objectives for any of the
public services:
Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Parks?
Other public facilities?
Discussion: The proposed project will result in an incremental but not significant demand for additional government services, which will be mitigated through payment of development impact fees. Therefore, impacts that may result from this project on government services are considered less than significant.
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact Source
XVI. RECREATION.
a) Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the
environment?
Discussion (a and b): The project is for light industrial uses and is not expected to have a significant impact on local recreation facilities.
The project will be required to install curb, gutter and sidewalk in Airport Road, which will incrementally improve offsite parking and pedestrian access in the vicinity.
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact Source
XVII. TRANSPORTATION. Would the project:
a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy
addressing the circulation system, including transit,
roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?
1 Attachment 6
Discussion: The project includes the widening of Airport Drive, which is identified in the General Plan Circulation Element1 as an undivided arterial. Widening will accommodate two travel lanes, a center turn lane, and a southbound shoulder for a future southbound Class II bike lane consistent with City standards.
A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) was prepared for this project by Central Coast Transportation Consulting, dated November 2022 (Attachment 14). According to the study, the Stravinski and Daou warehouse projects would generate approximately 646 new vehicle and truck trips per weekday, including 64 AM and 68 PM peak hour trips using warehouse trip generations rates. Since the SR 46 E and Airport Road intersection has a high collision rate that is significantly higher than the statewide average rate for similar facilities, mitigation measures will be required to maintain consistency with the safety policies established in the Circulation Element. These mitigation measures include prohibiting outbound distribution trucks between the following times (at the time the Huer Huero Creek Bridge is constructed, there is no longer a prohibition on outbound distribution times):
• Monday through Thursday: 3 to 6 PM
• Friday: 2 to 6 PM
• Sunday: 10 AM to 2 PM
Additionally, a mitigation measure has been added requiring the applicant to participate in one of the following improvements to be constructed to serve project truck trips:
• Extend the eastbound median acceleration lane at the SR 46 E/Airport Road intersection and require trucks to use Airport Road; or • Accommodate westbound U-turns for STAA trucks on SR 46 E with Caltrans approval; or • Construct a Huer Huero Creek Bridge (by others) and require trucks to use Golden Hill Road. Truck levels to be evaluated after occupancy and construction of the bridge prior to removing the time restrictions listed above.
Lastly, the applicant will be required to participate in an agreement to share costs associated with construction and maintenance of these and other affected local roads. Other regional improvements to access on SR 46 E are included in the City’s Development Impact Fees.
With these mitigation measures noted above, the project’s impacts will be reduced to less than significant. b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines §
15064.3, subdivision (b)?
Discussion: A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) was prepared for this project by Central Coast Transportation Consulting, dated November 2022 (Attachment 14), which concluded the project will have a less than significant impact on vehicle miles traveled (VMT) based on the City’s 2022 Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines thresholds, which indicate, “Office and industrial projects may have a significant impact if the work VMT per employee exceeds 85 percent of the regional average”. Based on the SLOCOG Travel Demand Model, the project is expected to have a work VMT lower than the threshold of significance. c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
Discussion: The project is located on a straight stretch of Airport Road. There are no hazardous design features associated, with, planned for or will result from this project.
d) Result in inadequate emergency access?
Discussion: The project has been reviewed by the City’s Department of Emergency Services. The project will not impede emergency access, and is designed in compliance with all emergency access safety features and to City emergency access standards.
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact Source
XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES.
a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code § 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California
Native American tribe, and that is:
i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California
Register of Historical Resources, or in a local
register of historical resources as defined in Public
Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or
Attachment 6
ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its
discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to
be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code § 5024.1.
In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c)
of Public Resource Code § 5024.1, the lead agency
shall consider the significance of the resource to a
California Native American tribe.
Discussion: As identified in Section V., the Cultural Resources Study prepared by Material Culture Consulting (Attachment 10) indicates the site was developed with a structure and outbuildings by at least 1937. The History Evaluation Report (Attachment 9) concluded that the farmhouse did not meet historic eligibility criteria since it does not contribute to any historical event, historical figures, and the house does not possess architectural distinction unique among others.
As part of the Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment, a records search was conducted which identified eleven previously conducted cultural resources investigations within 1-mile of the Project Area, none of which intersect the Project Area. No previously recorded cultural resources were identified within the Project Area. Three previously recorded cultural resources were identified within 1-mile of the Project Area, two of which are historic and one is prehistoric and include the Estrella Adobe just 850 feet northeast of the Project Area.
Based on the above, the probability of encountering cultural resources within the Project Area is considered moderate. Due to the historic occupation of the Project Area and the presence of the Estrella Adobe, mitigation measures have been applied to the project including requiring archaeological monitoring for vegetation clearing, trimming, and removal, and during ground disturbance occurring within the first five (5) feet below surface during construction. Therefore, with the mitigation incorporated, this project will result in less than significant impacts on tribal cultural resources.
Consultation with the Salinan Tribe of Monterey and San Luis Obispo Counties resulted in a request for a Phase 1 be performed and staff forwarded the Phase 1 for their review. At the timing of publishing this report, it did not result in any additional mitigation measure recommendations or requests.
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact Source
XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project:
a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm
water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the construction or
relocation of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
Discussion: There is existing water and sewer available in Airport Road at the southern end of the project site that the project will extend northward along Airport Road and connect to for both phases of the development. Per the City’s General Plan EIR, Urban Water Management Plan, and Sewer System Management Plan, the City’s water and wastewater treatment facilities are adequately sized, including planned facility upgrades, to provide water needed for this project and treat effluent resulting from this project. Therefore, this project will not result in the need to construct new facilities. No new off-site storm drainage facilities will be required to be constructed with this project, since the plans demonstrate all stormwater will be retained on-site. There are overhead power lines along Airport Road, which will be undergrounded as part of the Airport Road widening efforts. Based on this being an infill site with all utilities reasonably available, impacts to these facilities will be less than significant. b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development
during normal, dry and multiple dry years?
Attachment 6
Discussion: The project site is within the City limits and it is zoned to allow for industrial development. The City’s municipal water supply is composed of groundwater from the Paso Robles Groundwater Basin, an allocation of the Salinas River underflow, and a surface water allocation from the Nacimiento Lake pipeline project.
The City’s General Plan identified this site for future availability for water and sewer service, with the Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) verifying there is adequate capacity to serve the project. Based on these factors, water use for this project has been accounted for and therefore impacts to groundwater supplies are less than significant.
Standard conditions applied to all new development require the payment of development impact fees for water service expansion to mitigate its proportionate share of related impacts.
c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected
demand in addition to the provider’s existing
commitments?
Discussion: Per the City’s Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) the City’s wastewater treatment facility has adequate capacity to serve this project as well as existing commitments.
d) Generate solid waste in excess of state or local
standards, or in excess of the capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of
solid waste reduction goals?
Discussion: Per the City’s Landfill Master Plan, the City’s landfill has adequate capacity to accommodate construction related and operational solid waste disposal for this project.
e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Discussion: The proposed project will comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations.
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact Source
XX. WILDFIRE. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project:
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan?
Discussion: The City of Paso Robles does not have an adopted emergency response plan or evacuation plan. The site is zoned for industrial development, such as what is proposed. Therefore, the project could not impair emergency plans. b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors,
exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project
occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency
water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
Discussion (b and c): As previously identified in Section IX, the city does not contain any very-high fire severity zones. The site is at the urban – rural fringe, but is not heavily wooded. It is unlikely to be impacted by wildland fires and is not considered as being located within the wildland urban interface (WUI) and therefore would not need specific measures for fire-fighting purposes, beyond emergency vehicle access, clearance around buildings, and connection to water. The project has been reviewed by the City of Paso Robles Fire Department and designed with Fire Codes in mind. Given these considerations the impact will be less than significant. d) Expose people or structures to significant risks,
including downslope or downstream flooding or
landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope
instability, or drainage changes?
Discussion: The project site is flat and not subject to landslide potential or significant drainage changes.
Attachment 6
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact Source
XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, substantially reduce the number or restrict
the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
Discussion: As noted within this environmental document, and with the mitigation measures outlined in the document, the projects future development impacts related to habitat for wildlife species and oak tree preservation will be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. The project would not result in impacts to fish habitat or impacts to fish and wildlife populations. b) Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively
considerable” means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future
projects.)
Discussion: Based on the location of the project being within the City’s limits, consistency with the City’s General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, and implementation of mitigation measures including contribution of fees to existing programs or monitoring activities, the project would not result in any impacts that are cumulatively considerable. c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
Discussion: Since the site is zoned for industrial development which is anticipated by the existing General Plan and General Plan EIR, and since it would be developed at some point in the future with development that would have similar site disturbance such as grading and infrastructure for such development, and as a result of this study identifying mitigation measures for impacts created by the project, it is not anticipated that the project will result in substantial adverse environmental impacts on human beings, either directly or indirectly.
Attachment 6
EARLIER ANALYSIS AND BACKGROUND MATERIALS.
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration.
Section 15063 (c)(3)(D).
Earlier Documents Prepared and Utilized in this Analysis and Background / Explanatory Materials
Reference # Document Title Available for Review at:
1 City of Paso Robles General Plan City of Paso Robles Community Development Department
1000 Spring Street
Paso Robles, CA 93446
https://www.prcity.com/313/Ge
neral-Plan
2 City of Paso Robles Zoning Code https://library.municode.com/ca/ el_paso_de_robles/codes/code_o
f_ordinances
3 City of Paso Robles Environmental Impact Report for General Plan Update
City of Paso Robles
4 2005 Airport Land Use Plan https://www.prcity.com/354/Air port-Land-Use-Plan
5 City of Paso Robles Municipal Code https://library.municode.com/ca/ el_paso_de_robles/codes/code_o
f_ordinances
6 City of Paso Robles Water Master Plan City of Paso Robles 7 City of Paso Robles Urban Water Management Plan 2016 City of Paso Robles https://www.prcity.com/Docume
ntCenter/View/14827/UrbanWater-Management-Plan-PDF
8 City of Paso Robles Sewer Master Plan City of Paso Robles https://www.prcity.com/Docume
ntCenter/View/15356/SewerSystem-Management-PlanPDF?bidId= 9 City of Paso Robles Housing Element City of Paso Robles https://www.prcity.com/Docume
ntCenter/View/30615/201201-
Adopted-Housing-Element2021-2028
10 City of Paso Robles Standard Conditions of Same as above Attachment 6
Approval for New Development
11 San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District Guidelines for Impact Thresholds
https://www.slocleanair.org/rule
s-regulations/land-use-ceqa.php
12 San Luis Obispo County – Land Use Element San Luis Obispo County Department of Planning
County Government Center
San Luis Obispo, CA 93408
13 Regional Transportation Plan,
San Luis Obispo Council of Governments, 2019 https://slocog.org/2019RTP
14 Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
California Resources Agency
https://www.conservation.ca.go
v/dlrp/fmmp
15 USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service
https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.us
da.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx
16 Cortese List
California Department of Toxic Substance Control
https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.
gov/public/map/
Attachments:
1. Vicinity Map
2. Site Plan
3. Perspective Renderings
4. Mitigation Monitoring & Report Plan
5. Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment (December 2022) by Ambient Air Quality & Noise Consulting
6. Biological Resources Assessment (December 2022) by Sage Institute
7. Tree Evaluation Report (March 2022) by Althouse & Meade
8. Noise Analysis (May 2022) by 45dB Acoustics
9. History Evaluation Report (July 2019) by Katie Vallaire of LSA
10. Cultural Resources Assessment (June 2022) by Material Culture Consulting, Inc.
11. Geotechnical Engineering Report (April 2022) by Mid-Coast Geotechnical, Inc.
12. Preliminary Stormwater Control Plan, Stravinski (May 2022) by Wallace Group
13. Preliminary Stormwater Control Plan, Daou Vineyards (May 2022) by Wallace Group
14. Traffic Impact Study (November 2022) by Central Coast Transportation Consulting Attachment 6
Attachment 1
Vicinity Map
Attachment 6
Attachment 2
Site Plan
Attachment 6
Attachment 3
Perspective Renderings
Stravinski
Attachment 6
Attachment 3
Perspective Renderings
Daou
Attachment 6
Attachment 4
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 1 of 33
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan
Project File No./Name: Stravinski – Daou Developments Approving Resolution No.: by: Planning Commission City Council Date:
The following environmental mitigation measures were either incorporated into the approved plans or will be incorporated into the conditions of approval. Each and every mitigation measure listed below has been found by the approving body indicated above to lessen the level of environmental impact of the project to a level of non-significance. A completed and signed checklist for each mitigation measure indicates that it has been completed.
Explanation of Headings:
Type: ............................................................ Project, ongoing, cumulative Monitoring Department or Agency: ........ Department or Agency responsible for monitoring a particular mitigation measure Shown on Plans: ......................................... When a mitigation measure is shown on the plans, this column will be initialed and dated.
Verified Implementation: .......................... When a mitigation measure has been implemented, this column will be initialed and dated.
Remarks: ...................................................... Area for describing status of ongoing mitigation measure, or for other information.
Mitigation Measure
PD22-04 / PD22-09 / OTR22-06/ PR 22-0022 Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
AES-1. Prior to issuance of construction permits in
either phase, the Applicant shall provide a revised lighting plan for the respective phase that demonstrates that the selected light fixtures, locations, and optical distribution patterns comply with the California Green Building Code standards. Specifically, the plan shall evaluate the light fixture selection against the lighting zone that is appropriate. Backlight, uplight, and glare (BUG) ratings provided by the manufacturer of the proposed fixtures shall be provided for each fixture type proposed. The lighting plans shall be prepared by a qualified engineer who is an active member of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA) using guidance and best Project City of Paso
Robles
Community
Development
Department
(CDD)
X Notes shown on
construction documents.
Prior to issuance of building permit.
Attachment 6
Attachment 4
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 2 of 33
Mitigation Measure
PD22-04 / PD22-09 / OTR22-06/ PR 22-0022 Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
practices endorsed by the International Dark Sky Association. All fixtures shall meet or exceed the standards of the California Green Building Code Maximum Allowable BUG Rating (Table 5.106.8 in the 2019 version). The plan shall also include the following to meet this requirement:
a. In order to prevent “hot spots” onto the
structures, wall mounted fixtures shall be positioned for lighting at the ground level and around the building for safety using appropriate IES uniformity ratings and shall not shed light back onto the building. To achieve this, the plan shall consider use of house side shields to minimize glare that may be observed from the vertical surface of the building walls. Walls that include wall mounted light fixtures shall use nonreflective materials, including nonreflective glass. b. The project shall include lighting controls and
dimming capabilities for both building-related lighting and pedestrian/parking-related lighting, based on the IES, California Green Building Code, and California Energy Code minimums. Occupancy sensors shall be utilized so that lighting is dimmed or turned off when an area is unoccupied. c. Lighting in parking areas and along drive aisles
shall be the minimum level necessary to provide appropriate visibility of pedestrians and vehicles.
Attachment 6
Attachment 4
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 3 of 33
Mitigation Measure
PD22-04 / PD22-09 / OTR22-06/ PR 22-0022 Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
d. Lighting fixtures located in parking areas or drive
aisles shall not be located adjacent to or above trees that will obscure lighting beyond safe levels as the trees mature. e. Any exterior lighting, including lighting for signs, shall be “warm-white” or filtered (correlated color temperature of < 3,000 Kelvin; scotopic/photopic ratio of < 1.2) to minimize blue emissions.
f. All exterior lighting fixtures shall be
International Dark Sky Association approved (Fixture Seal of Approval program) and shall be installed so that they are shielded and directed downwards.
AQ-1. The following mitigation measures shall be
implemented for each respective Phase of development to reduce construction generated fugitive dust. These measures shall be shown on grading and building plans. a. Reduce the amount of disturbed area where
possible.
b. Use water trucks, SLOAPCD-approved dust
suppressants (see Section 4.3 in the CEQA Air Quality
Handbook), or sprinkler systems in sufficient quantities to prevent airborne dust from leaving the
site and from exceeding the District’s limit of 20%
opacity for greater than 3 minutes in any 60-
minute period. Increased watering frequency would be
required whenever wind speeds exceed 15 mph.
Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction documents.
Prior to issuance of grading permit for each Phase.
Attachment 6
Attachment 4
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 4 of 33
Mitigation Measure
PD22-04 / PD22-09 / OTR22-06/ PR 22-0022 Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
Reclaimed (non-potable) water should be used whenever possible. Please note that since water use is a concern due to drought conditions, the contractor or builder shall consider the use of an APCD-approved dust suppressant where possible to reduce the amount of water used for dust control. For a list of
suppressants, see Section 4.3 of the CEQA Air Quality
Handbook. c. All dirt stockpile areas should be sprayed daily or covered with tarps or other dust barriers as needed.
d. All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc. to be paved should be completed as soon as possible. In addition, building pads should be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. e. All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose
materials are to be covered or should maintain at
least two feet of freeboard (minimum vertical distance
between the top of load and top of trailer) in accordance with CVC Section 23114. f. “Track-Out” is defined as sand or soil that adheres to and/or agglomerates on the exterior surfaces of motor vehicles and/or equipment (including tires) that may then fall onto any highway or street as described in CVC Section 23113 and California Water Code 13304. To prevent ‘track out’, designate access points and require all employees, subcontractors, and others to use them. Install and operate a ‘track-out prevention device’ Attachment 6
Attachment 4
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 5 of 33
Mitigation Measure
PD22-04 / PD22-09 / OTR22-06/ PR 22-0022 Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto paved streets. The ‘track-out prevention device’ can be any device or combination of devices that are effective at preventing track out, located at the point of intersection of an unpaved area and a paved road.
Rumble strips or steel plate devices need periodic cleaning to be effective. If paved roadways accumulate tracked out soils, the trackout prevention device may need to be modified. g. Permanent dust control measures identified in the
approved project revegetation and landscape plans should be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities. h. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be
reworked at dates greater than one month after
initial grading should be sown with a fast germinating, non-invasive grass seed and watered until vegetation is established. i. All disturbed soil areas not subject to revegetation should be stabilized using approved chemical soil binders, jute netting, or other methods approved in advance by the SLOAPCD. j. Vehicle speed for all construction vehicles shall not exceed 15 mph on any unpaved surface at the construction site. k. Sweep streets at the end of each day if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent paved roads. Water
Attachment 6
Attachment 4
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 6 of 33
Mitigation Measure
PD22-04 / PD22-09 / OTR22-06/ PR 22-0022 Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
sweepers with reclaimed water should be used where possible. Roads shall be pre-wetted prior to sweeping when possible. l. The burning of vegetative material shall be
prohibited. Effective February 25, 2000, the APCD
prohibited developmental burning of vegetative
material within San Luis Obispo County. If you have any questions regarding these requirements, contact the SLOAPCD Engineering & Compliance Division at (805) 781-5912. m. The contractor or builder shall designate a person or persons to monitor the fugitive dust emissions and enhance the implementation of the measures as necessary to minimize dust complaints, reduce visible emissions below 20% opacity, and to prevent the transport of dust offsite. Their duties shall include holidays and weekend periods when work may not be in progress. The name and telephone number of such persons shall be provided to the SLOAPCD Compliance Division prior to the start of any grading, earthwork or demolition.
AQ-2. The following measures shall be implemented for
each respective Phase of development to reduce construction emissions from on and off-road construction equipment (NOx, ROG, and DPM) and area
sources. These measures shall be shown on grading and building plans:
Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction documents.
Prior to issuance of grading permit for each Phase.
Attachment 6
Attachment 4
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 7 of 33
Mitigation Measure
PD22-04 / PD22-09 / OTR22-06/ PR 22-0022 Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
a. Maintain all construction equipment in proper tune
according to manufacturer’s specifications.
b. Heavy-duty (50 horsepower or greater) diesel-fueled
construction equipment shall meet, at a minimum, ARB's Tier 3 certified engines, or cleaner, off-road heavy-duty diesel engines; be fitted with diesel exhaust particulate filters in accordance with manufacturer recommendations; and, comply with the State Off-Road Regulation. Heavy-duty equipment with Tier 4 engines shall be used to the extent locally available. Where Tier 3, or cleaner, equipment is not available, incorporate diesel emission control strategies/retrofits, such that emission reductions achieved equal or exceed that of a Tier 3 engine. Installing California Verified Diesel Emission Control Strategies. Verified diesel emissions control strategies can be found at:
arb.ca.gov/diesel/verdev/vt/cvt.htm. c. When applicable, portable equipment, 50 horsepower (hp) or greater, used during construction
activities shall be registered with the California
statewide portable equipment registration program (issued by the California Air Resources Board) or be permitted by the APCD. Such equipment may include power screens, conveyors, internal combustion engines, crushers, portable generators, tub grinders, trammel screens, and portable plants (e.g., aggregate plant, Attachment 6
Attachment 4
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 8 of 33
Mitigation Measure
PD22-04 / PD22-09 / OTR22-06/ PR 22-0022 Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
asphalt plant, concrete plant). For more information,
contact the SLOAPCD Engineering & Compliance Division at (805) 781-5912. d. Use on-road heavy-duty trucks that meet the ARB’s
2007 or cleaner certification standard for onroad
heavy-duty diesel engines, and comply with the State
On-Road Regulation.
e. All on and off-road diesel equipment shall not idle
when not in use. Signs shall be posted in the
designated queuing areas and or job sites to remind
drivers and operators of the 5-minute idling limit.
f. Construction equipment staging areas shall be
located at the furthest distance possible from nearby sensitive land uses. g. To the extent locally available, electrified or
alternatively powered construction equipment shall
be used. h. Construction of the proposed project shall use lowVOC content paints (e.g., 50 grams VOC per liter, or less).
i. To the extent locally available, use prefinished
building materials or materials that do not require the application of architectural coatings. j. Meet or exceed Cal Green Tier 2 standards for
reducing cement use in concrete mix as allowed by local ordinance and conditions.
Attachment 6
Attachment 4
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 9 of 33
Mitigation Measure
PD22-04 / PD22-09 / OTR22-06/ PR 22-0022 Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
AQ-3. The following mitigation measures shall be
implemented for each respective Phase of development to reduce the operational emissions generated by the project: a. For the proposed Stravinski refrigerated warehouse, the use of diesel-fueled transport refrigeration units (TRUs) or auxiliary power units shall not be used. All truck TRUs to be used by the building tenant(s) shall be plug-in capable. b. Electrical main service panel shall for both
warehouses shall be designed to accommodate the
potential future installation of electric charging stations for haul trucks.
c. Heavy-duty trucks to be owned by the project
applicants shall be model year 2014, or later. To the extent available, zero-emission vehicles should be used. d. Warehouse service equipment (e.g., yard hostlers,
yard equipment, forklifts, pallet jacks) shall be zeroemission. e. In accordance with ARB’s Airborne Toxic Control
Measure to Limit Diesel-Fueled Commercial Motor Vehicle Idling, Heavy-duty diesel-fueled truck idle time shall be limited to 5-minutes/truck when not in use. Signage shall be posted at loading dock areas to advise drivers of this requirement.
f. Provide a pedestrian-friendly and interconnected
streetscape with good access to/from the development
Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction documents.
Prior to issuance of grading permit for each Phase.
Attachment 6
Attachment 4
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 10 of 33
Mitigation Measure
PD22-04 / PD22-09 / OTR22-06/ PR 22-0022 Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
for pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users to make alternative transportation more convenient, comfortable, and safe. g. Implement programs to reduce employee vehicle
miles traveled (e.g. incentives, SLO Regional
Rideshare trip reduction program, vanpools, remote
working, alternative schedules.)
h. Provide employee lockers and showers to promote
bicycle and pedestrian use. One shower and 5 lockers for every 25 new employees is recommended. i. Exceed Cal Green standards by 25% for providing onsite bicycle parking: both short-term racks and longterm lockers, or a locked room with standard racks and access limited to bicyclists only.
j. Reduce fugitive dust from roads and parking areas
with the use of paving or other materials.
k. Exceed Cal Green Tier 2 standards for building energy efficiency.
l. Exceed Cal Green Tier 2 standards for utilizing
recycled content materials.
m. Exceed Cal Green Tier 2 standards for the use of
greywater, rainwater, or recycled water where
applicable/available. n. Exceed Cal Green Tier 2 standards for using shading, trees, plants, cool roofs, etc. to reduce "heat island" effect.
Attachment 6
Attachment 4
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 11 of 33
Mitigation Measure
PD22-04 / PD22-09 / OTR22-06/ PR 22-0022 Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
o. Exceed Cal Green building standards at the time of
development for water conservation (e.g. use of low
flow water fixtures, water efficient irrigation systems, and draught tolerant landscaping.) p. All built-in appliances shall be Energy Star certified or equivalent.
q. Design roof trusses to handle dead weight loads of
standard solar-heated water and photovoltaic panels.
r. To the extent available, use paints and cleaning
products that are low-VOC content (e.g., 50 grams/liter VOC content, or less). s. Utilize on-site renewable energy system (e.g. solar, wind, geothermal, biomass and/or bio-gas) to offset at least 10% of the project’s electricity use.
AQ-4. Prior to project construction for Phase 2 only, the SLOAPCD shall be consulted to identify applicable
permitting limitations and requirements for wine production and the proposed wastewater pond. A Permit to Operate (PTO) shall be obtained from the SLOAPCD prior to installation of permitted equipment or processes.
Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction documents.
Prior to issuance of grading permit for Phase 2.
AQ-5. The following mitigation measures shall be
implemented for each respective Phase of development to reduce the disturbance of asbestos and lead. Strategies include but are not limited to the following:
a. Demolition of on-site structures shall comply with
the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction documents.
Prior to issuance of demolition permit for either Phase. Prior to issuance of grading permit for either Phase.
Attachment 6
Attachment 4
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 12 of 33
Mitigation Measure
PD22-04 / PD22-09 / OTR22-06/ PR 22-0022 Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
Emissions requirements (NESHAP, 40 CFR, Part 61,
Subpart M) for the demolition of existing structures.
The SLOAPCD is delegated authority by the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to implement
the Federal Asbestos NESHAP. Prior to demolition of
on-site structures, the SLOAPCD shall be notified,
per NESHAP requirements. Additional information may
be obtained at website URL:
http://slocleanair.org/ business/asbestos.php. b. If during the demolition of existing structures, paint is separated from the construction materials (e.g.
chemically or physically), the paint waste will be
evaluated independently from the building material
by a qualified hazardous materials inspector to
determine its proper management. All hazardous
materials shall be handled and disposed of in
accordance with local, state and federal regulations.
According to the Department of Toxic Substances
Control (DTSC), if the paint is not removed from
the building material during demolition (and is not
chipping or peeling), the material can be disposed of as construction debris (a non-hazardous waste). The landfill operator will be contacted prior to disposal of building material debris to determine any specific requirements the landfill may have regarding the disposal of lead-based paint materials. The disposal of demolition debris shall comply with any such Attachment 6
Attachment 4
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 13 of 33
Mitigation Measure
PD22-04 / PD22-09 / OTR22-06/ PR 22-0022 Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
requirements. Contact the SLOAPCD Enforcement Division at (805) 781-5912 for more information. Approval of a lead work plan and permit may be required. Lead work plans, if required, will need to be submitted to SLOAPCD ten days prior to the start of demolition. c. Prior to any grading activities, a geologic evaluation shall be conducted to determine if naturally
occurring asbestos (NOA) is present within the area
that will be disturbed. If NOA is not present, an
exemption request must be filed with the SLOAPCD. If
NOA is found at the site, the applicant must complywith all requirements outlined in the Asbestos ATCM.These requirements may include but are not limited to:
1) Development of an Asbestos Dust Mitigation Plan
which must be approved by the SLOAPCD beforeoperations begin, and, 2) Development and approval of an Asbestos Health
and Safety Program (required for some projects).
BIO-1. To reduce any potentially significant impact on
nesting birds from vegetation and tree removals, the following mitigation measure is recommended for each Phase of development:
Vegetation removal and initial site disturbance shall be conducted between September 1st and January 31st outside of the nesting season for birds. If vegetation Project CDD /
Qualified
Biologist
X Notes shown on
construction documents. Site inspection as needed.
Prior to issuance of grading permit for each Phase.
Attachment 6
Attachment 4
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 14 of 33
Mitigation Measure
PD22-04 / PD22-09 / OTR22-06/ PR 22-0022 Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
and/or tree removal is planned for the bird nesting season (February 1st to August 31st), then preconstruction nesting bird surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist to determine if any active nests would be impacted by project construction. If no active nests are found, then no further mitigation shall be
required.
If any active nests are found that would be impacted by construction, then the nest sites shall be avoided with the establishment of a non-disturbance buffer zone around active nests as determined by a qualified biologist. Nest sites shall be avoided and protected with the non-disturbance buffer zone until the adults
and young of the year are no longer reliant on the nest site for survival as determined by a qualified biologist.
As such, avoiding disturbance or take of an active nest would reduce potential impacts on nesting birds to a less-than-significant level.
BIO-2. To reduce any potentially significant impact on
bat roosts, the following mitigation measure is recommended for each Phase of development as needed per the demolition plans:
Prior to demolition of the existing buildings, an
evaluation for bat usage shall be conducted by a qualified biologist. If no evidence of bat use is detected, Project CDD /
Qualified
Biologist
X Notes shown on
construction documents. Site inspection as needed.
Prior to issuance of demolition permit in either Phase.
Attachment 6
Attachment 4
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 15 of 33
Mitigation Measure
PD22-04 / PD22-09 / OTR22-06/ PR 22-0022 Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
then no further mitigation shall be required. If an active bat roost is found that would be impacted by construction, then the roost site shall be avoided and protected until the roost is no longer occupied. Natal roosts shall be avoided until the adults and young disperse from the site. Exclusionary measures may be implemented for non-natal roosts to avoid direct mortality of individuals. As such, avoiding disturbance to an active natal roost, and avoiding direct mortality from demolition would reduce potential impacts on roosting bats to a less-than-significant level.
BIO-3. To reduce any potentially significant impact on
the regional SJKF movement corridor, and avoid take of any SJKF from project construction, the following mitigation measures are recommended and can be completed for the entire project at once if part of the parcel map, or done by Phase if no parcel map:
Prior to issuance of grading and/or construction
permits, the applicant shall submit evidence to the City of Paso Robles Community Development Department that states that one or a combination of the following three San Joaquin kit fox compensatory mitigation measures has been implemented. The City in consultation with the CDFW will review the project site against the SJKF habitat evaluation form scoring and Project CDD x Notes shown on
construction documents. Submit written evidence to Planning Department.
Prior to issuance of grading permit or parcel map.
Attachment 6
Attachment 4
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 16 of 33
Mitigation Measure
PD22-04 / PD22-09 / OTR22-06/ PR 22-0022 Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
make a final determination of the appropriate ratio for project impact compensation for the loss of movement habitat within the corridor. The calculations
below are for reference and assume a maximum 3:1 ratio will be required by CDFW. a. Provide for the protection in perpetuity, through
acquisition of fee or a conservation easement of 52.5 acres (17.5 acres of development multiplied by 3 as a result of an applied 3:1 mitigation ratio) of suitable habitat in the kit fox corridor area (e.g. within the San Luis Obispo County kit fox habitat area, northwest of Highway 58), either on-site or off-site, and provide for a non-wasting endowment to provide for management and monitoring of the property in perpetuity. Lands to be conserved shall be subject to the review and approval of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and the City. This mitigation alternative (a.) requires that all aspects if this program must be in place before City permit issuance or initiation of any ground disturbing activities. b. Deposit funds into an approved in-lieu fee program, which would provide for the protection in perpetuity of suitable habitat in the kit fox corridor area within San Luis Obispo County, and provide for a non-wasting
endowment for management and monitoring of the
Attachment 6
Attachment 4
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 17 of 33
Mitigation Measure
PD22-04 / PD22-09 / OTR22-06/ PR 22-0022 Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
property in perpetuity. Mitigation alternative (b) above can be completed by providing funds to The Nature Conservancy (TNC) pursuant to the Voluntary FeeBased Compensatory Mitigation Program (Program). The Program was established in agreement between the CDFW and TNC to preserve San Joaquin kit fox habitat, and to provide a voluntary mitigation alternative to project proponents who must mitigate the impacts of projects in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The fee,
payable to “The Nature Conservancy,” would total: $131,250 (17.5 x 3 x $2,500). This fee is calculated based on the 2020 cost-per-unit of $2,500 per acre of mitigation, which is scheduled to be adjusted to
address the increasing cost of property in San Luis Obispo County; actual cost may increase (or decrease) depending on the timing of payment and final
mitigation ratio required. This fee must be paid after the CDFW provides written notification about your mitigation options but prior to City permit issuance and initiation of any ground disturbing activities. c. Purchase credits in a CDFW-approved conservation
bank, which would provide for the protection in perpetuity of suitable habitat within the kit fox corridor area and provide for a non-wasting endowment for management and monitoring of the property in Attachment 6
Attachment 4
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 18 of 33
Mitigation Measure
PD22-04 / PD22-09 / OTR22-06/ PR 22-0022 Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
perpetuity. Mitigation alternative (c) above can be completed by purchasing credits from the Palo Prieto Conservation Bank (see contact information below). The Palo Prieto Conservation Bank was established to preserve San Joaquin kit fox habitat, and to provide a voluntary mitigation alternative to project proponents who must mitigate the impacts of projects in accordance with the CEQA. The cost for purchasing credits is payable to the owners of The Palo Prieto Conservation Bank, would total: $131,250 (17.5 x 3 x
$2,500). This fee is calculated based on the 2020 costper-credit of $2,500 per acre of mitigation. The fee is established by the conservation bank owner and may change at any time. Actual cost may increase (or decrease) depending on the timing of payment and final mitigation ratio required. Purchase of credits must be completed prior to City permit issuance and initiation of any ground disturbing activities.
BIO-4. To avoid direct take of SJKF during construction in accordance with the San Luis Obispo County Guide to
SJKF Mitigation Procedures Under CEQA, the project owner(s) shall adopt the Standard Kit Fox CEQA Mitigation Measures and shall be included on development plans. The following measures shall be
implemented during each Phase of development:
Project CDD /
Qualified
Biologist
X Notes shown on
construction documents. Verification from qualified biologist.
Prior to issuance of grading permit for each Phase.
Attachment 6
Attachment 4
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 19 of 33
Mitigation Measure
PD22-04 / PD22-09 / OTR22-06/ PR 22-0022 Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
• Within 30 days of initiation of site disturbance and/or construction, a qualified biologist shall conduct a preactivity (i.e. pre-construction) survey for known or potential kit fox dens and submit a letter (or email) to the City reporting the date the survey was conducted, the survey protocol, survey results, and what measures were necessary (and completed), as applicable, to
address any potential kit fox activity within the project limits. This may include implementing the 3-day tracking survey per the USFWS Standardized Recommendations for Protection of the Endangered San Joaquin Kit Fox Prior To Or During Ground Disturbance (USFWS 2011) if deemed necessary by the qualified biologist. • A maximum 25 mph speed limit shall be required at
the project site during construction activities.
• All construction activities shall cease at dusk and not start before dawn.
• A qualified biologist shall be on-site immediately prior to initiation of project activities to inspect for any large burrows (e.g., known and potential dens) and to ensure no wildlife are injured during project activities. If dens are encountered, they should be avoided as discussed below. • Exclusion zone boundaries shall be established
around all known and potential kit fox dens.
Attachment 6
Attachment 4
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 20 of 33
Mitigation Measure
PD22-04 / PD22-09 / OTR22-06/ PR 22-0022 Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
• All excavations deeper than 2 feet shall be completely covered at the end of each working day.
• All pipes, culverts, or similar structures shall be
inspected for SJKF and other wildlife before burying, capping, or moving. • All exposed openings of pipes, culverts, or similar
structures shall be capped or temporarily sealed prior
to the end of each working day.
• All food-related trash shall be removed from the site at the end of each work day.
• Project-related equipment shall be prohibited outside of designated work areas and access routes.
• No firearms shall be allowed in the project area. • Disturbance to burrows shall be avoided to the greatest extent feasible.
• No rodenticides or herbicides should be applied in the project area.
• Permanent fences shall allow for SJKF passage
through or underneath (i.e., an approximate 4-inch passage gap shall remain at ground level). • Prior to issuance of grading and/or construction
permit and within 30 days prior to initiation of site disturbance and/or construction, all personnel associated with the project shall attend a worker education training program, conducted by a qualified biologist, to avoid or reduce impacts on sensitive
biological resources (i.e. San Joaquin kit fox). At a
Attachment 6
Attachment 4
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 21 of 33
Mitigation Measure
PD22-04 / PD22-09 / OTR22-06/ PR 22-0022 Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
minimum, as the program relates to the kit fox, the training shall include the kit fox’s life history, all mitigation measures specified by the City, as well as any related biological report(s) prepared for the project. The applicant shall notify the City shortly prior to this meeting. A kit fox fact sheet shall also be developed prior to the training program, and distributed at the training program to all contractors, employers and other personnel involved with the construction of the project. • During the site-disturbance and/or construction phase, any contractor or employee that inadvertently kills or injures a San Joaquin kit fox or who finds any such animal either dead, injured, or entrapped shall be required to report the incident immediately to the applicant and City. In the event that any observations are made of injured or dead kit fox, the applicant shall immediately notify the USFWS and CDFW by telephone. In addition, formal notification shall be provided in writing within three working days of the finding of any such animal(s). Notification shall include the date, time, location and circumstances of the incident. Any threatened or endangered species found dead or injured shall be turned over immediately to CDFW for care, analysis, or disposition.
Attachment 6
Attachment 4
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 22 of 33
Mitigation Measure
PD22-04 / PD22-09 / OTR22-06/ PR 22-0022 Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
BIO-5. To fully mitigate proposed impacts to three
native valley oaks, the project owner(s) shall
implement the Mitigation Recommendations provided
in the May 12, 2022, Tree Evaluation Letter prepared by Althouse and Mead.
Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction documents.
Prior to issuance of grading permit
BIO-6. Oak trees removed by the project shall be
replaced in accordance with the City’s Oak Tree
Preservation Ordinance.
Project CDD X Notes shown on
construction documents.
Site inspection prior to final.
BIO-7. Tree Protection Zone Restrictions for Trees No.
4, 5 and 6:
• No ground disturbance, grading, trenching,
construction activities or structural development
shall occur within the tree protection zone (TPZ; e.g., the dripline of protected trees) except as specifically authorized by the project's development permit and Project Arborist.
• Setbacks for TPZ fencing may be adjusted under
guidance of the Project Arborist.
• All temporary vehicle and equipment access areas
within TPZ boundaries will require a minimum 6-inch layer of wood chip mulch to mitigate soil compaction over the critical root zone (CRZ). Additionally, the Project Arborist may require the addition of plywood or rubber mats over the mulch in frequently traveled sensitive areas.
Project CDD / Project
Arborist
X Notes shown on
construction documents.
Prior to issuance of grading permit
Attachment 6
Attachment 4
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 23 of 33
Mitigation Measure
PD22-04 / PD22-09 / OTR22-06/ PR 22-0022 Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
• No equipment, soil, or construction materials shall be placed, staged, or stored within the TPZ. No oil, gasoline, chemicals, paints, solvents, or other damaging materials shall be deposited within the TPZ or in drainage channels, swales or areas that may lead to the TPZ. • Unless otherwise directed by the Project Arborist, all work done within the TPZ, including digging, trenching and planting, shall be done with hand tools or small hand-held power tools that are of a depth and design that will not cause root damage. • Where trenching or digging within the TPZ is
specifically permitted, the work shall be conducted in a manner that minimizes root damage, as directed by the Arborist. All roots larger than 1-inch in diameter shall be clean cut with sharp pruning tools and not left ragged. • Any exposed roots shall be re-covered with soil the
same day they were exposed if possible. If they cannot, they must be covered with burlap or another suitable material and wet down 2 times per day until reburied. • Grade changes outside of the TPZ shall not
significantly alter drainage to protected trees. Grading within the TPZ shall use methods that minimize root damage and ensure that roots are not cut off from air. Where erosion may be a factor, return and protect the original grade or otherwise stabilize the soil.
Attachment 6
Attachment 4
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 24 of 33
Mitigation Measure
PD22-04 / PD22-09 / OTR22-06/ PR 22-0022 Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
• Protected trees shall not be used for posting signs,
electrical wires or pulleys; for supporting structures; and shall be kept free of nails, screws, rope, wires, stakes and any other unauthorized fastening devices or attachments.
BIO-8. Tree Protection Fencing. Fencing shall be temporary, readily visible, orange snow drift/construction fencing, and a minimum of 4-feet high. Fencing shall be secured to 6-foot t-posts, driven into the ground by 12 inches, and placed at intervals of 8 feet minimum. Fencing can be fastened to the t-posts with bailing wire or zip ties. Fencing shall be installed outside the CRZ unless modifications are approved by the Project Arborists. Fencing shall effectively: 1) keep the foliage, crown, branch structure and trunk clear from damage by equipment, materials or disturbances; 2) preserve roots and soil in an intact and noncompacted state; and 3) identify the TPZ. Fencing shall be maintained for the duration of construction. Fencing shall be removed as the last item of contract work.
Project CDD / Project
Arborist
X Notes shown on
construction documents.
Prior to issuance of grading permit
BIO-9. Signs. One English language and one Spanish language, readily visible, durable, waterproof sign shall be installed on tree protection fences in 4 equidistant locations around each individual protected tree or tree clusters. Signs placed on fencing around a stand of protected trees shall be placed at approximately 50- foot intervals. The Project CDD / Project
Arborist
X Notes shown on
construction documents.
Prior to issuance of grading permit
Attachment 6
Attachment 4
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 25 of 33
Mitigation Measure
PD22-04 / PD22-09 / OTR22-06/ PR 22-0022 Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
size of each sign must be a minimum of 16 inches wide and must contain the wording below. The lettering in the word "WARNING" ("ADVERTENCIA") must be in capital letters at least 2 inches in height; the phrase "TREE PROTECTION ZONE" ("ZONA DE PROTECCIÓN DE ÁRBOLES") must be in capital letters at least 1 inch in height; all other lettering must be at least ½ inch in size.
BIO-10. • Preconstruction. If construction is planned to occur between February 1 and September 15, a qualifiedbiologist shall survey both Project trees and vegetationwithin 100 feet of Project area for nesting birds (300feet for raptors) within one week of constructionactivities. If nesting birds are present the biologist willcoordinate with Project manager to minimize impacts to nesting birds.
• During Construction. An Arborist shall determine
when to be onsite to monitor all grubbing, trenching,digging, and grading during construction activitieswithin the TPZ. If required, the Arborist shall inform theCity of Paso Robles Community DevelopmentDepartment when tree protective fencing may beremoved. • Unanticipated Tree Damage Reporting. In the event
that unanticipated or unauthorized impacts are inflictedon protected trees, the Project Arborist shall beimmediately notified. The Project Arborist shall inspect Project CDD / Project
Arborist
X Notes shown on
construction
documents.
Prior to issuance of grading permit
Attachment 6
Attachment 4
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 26 of 33
Mitigation Measure
PD22-04 / PD22-09 / OTR22-06/ PR 22-0022 Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
damaged trees and prepare unanticipated damage reports with remediation recommendations to the Project Manager. Any damage or wounds to a tree shall be corrected within 24 hours of notification by a certified Arborist using International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) guidelines. • Post-Construction Arborist Monitoring and Reporting.
Post-construction monitoring and reporting will be performed by the Arborist as required by the City of Paso Robles.
CUL-1. A trained and qualified archaeological monitor
should perform cultural resources monitoring of any
ground disturbing activities associated with either
Phase of the Project that has the potential to impact cultural resources (i.e. grading, trenching). Monitoring is not effective during activities where the soil matrix is not visually exposed (i.e. pile-driving for installation of solar pylons). The monitor will have the ability to redirect construction activities to ensure avoidance of significant impacts to cultural resources.
Project CDD / Project
Archaeologist
X Notes on
construction documents.
Prior to issuance of grading permits for each Phase.
CUL-2. During the initial vegetation removal and
grading up to five feet below current ground surface of the site for each Phase of development, we recommend full time cultural resources monitoring. The project archaeologist, in coordination with the City of Paso
Project CDD / Project
Archaeologist
X Notes on
construction documents.
Ongoing during grading and construction for each Phase.
Attachment 6
Attachment 4
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 27 of 33
Mitigation Measure
PD22-04 / PD22-09 / OTR22-06/ PR 22-0022 Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
Robles, may re-evaluate the necessity for monitoring after the initial five feet of excavations have been completed.
CUL-3. In the event that these resources are
inadvertently discovered during ground-disturbing activities, work must be halted within 50 feet of the find until it can be evaluated by a qualified archaeologist.
Construction activities could continue in other areas. If the discovery proves to be significant, additional work, such as data recovery excavation or fossil recovery, may be warranted and would be discussed in consultation with the appropriate regulatory agency(ies). Any potentially significant artifacts, sites or features observed shall be collected and recorded in conjunction with best management practices and professional standards. Any cultural items recovered during mitigation should be deposited in an accredited and permanent scientific institution for the benefit of current and future generations.
A report documenting the results of the monitoring
efforts, including any data recovery activities and the significance of any cultural resources will be prepared and submitted to the appropriate City and County
personnel.
Project Project
Archaeologist,
SLO County
Coroner,
Native
American
Heritage
Commission
X As needed Ongoing during
grading and construction of each Phase.
Attachment 6
Attachment 4
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 28 of 33
Mitigation Measure
PD22-04 / PD22-09 / OTR22-06/ PR 22-0022 Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
Procedures of conduct following the discovery of
human remains on non-federal lands have been
mandated by California Health and Safety Code
§7050.5, PRC §5097.98 and the California Code of
Regulations (CCR) §15064.5(e). According to the
provisions in CEQA, should human remains be
encountered, all work in the immediate vicinity of the
burial must cease, and any necessary steps to
insure the integrity of the immediate area must be
taken. The Orange County Coroner will be immediately
notified. The Coroner must then determine whether
the remains are Native American. If the Coroner
determines the remains are Native American, the
Coroner has 24 hours to notify the NAHC, who will, in
turn, notify the person they identify as the most likely descendent (MLD) of any human remains. Further
actions will be determined, in part, by the desires of the MLD. The MLD has 48 hours to make recommendations
regarding the disposition of the remains following notification from the NAHC of the discovery. If the MLD does not make recommendations within 48 hours, the owner shall, with appropriate dignity, reinter the remains in an area of the property secure from further disturbance. Alternatively, if the owner does not accept the MLD’s recommendations, the owner or the descendent may request mediation by the NAHC.
Attachment 6
Attachment 4
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 29 of 33
Mitigation Measure
PD22-04 / PD22-09 / OTR22-06/ PR 22-0022 Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
GHG-1. In addition to implementation of Mitigation
Measure AQ-3 and AQ-4 (noted above), the following
additional measures shall be implemented:
a. Proposed land uses shall elect to receive electricity from Central Coast Community Energy (3CE).
b. Building mechanical equipment and appliances shall
be electrically powered. The installation of natural-gas service/infrastructure shall be prohibited. c. The Project shall provide organic waste pick up and
shall provide the appropriate on-site enclosures consistent with the provisions of the City of Paso Robles Development Standards for Solid Waste Services. d. Meet current CALGreen Tier 2 standards for electric
vehicle (EV) parking spaces, except that all EV parking spaces required by the code shall be “EV-capable” instead of “EV-ready”.
Project CDD X Shown on building
plans.
Before building permit issuance for each Phase.
GHG-2. The project shall provide carbon offsets
sufficient to reduce project-generated GHG emissions
to below applicable thresholds for each phase of development, calculated over the life of each phase of the project. Based on the modeling conducted, the project shall provide offsets in the total amount of 5,899 MTCO2e (3,929 MTCO2e for the Stravinski Project CDD X Shown on building
plans. Submit verification from ARB approved registry
Prior to issuance of a grading permit for each Phase.
Attachment 6
Attachment 4
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 30 of 33
Mitigation Measure
PD22-04 / PD22-09 / OTR22-06/ PR 22-0022 Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
warehouse (Phase 1) and 1,970 MTCO2e for the Daou Warehouse(Phase 2). Under CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.4, subdivisions (c)(3) and (c)(4), a project’s GHG emissions can be reduced through the application of off-site measures, which may include “Direct Reduction Activities” or the purchase of “Carbon Offset Credits”, which are discussed as follows:
Direct Reduction Activities
Directly undertake or fund activities that will reduce or sequester GHG emissions. GHG reduction credits shall
achieve GHG emission reductions that are real, permanent, quantifiable, verifiable, enforceable, in accordance with the criteria set forth in the ARB’s most recent Process for the Review and Approval of Compliance Offset Protocols in Support of the Cap-andTrade Regulation (2013). GHG reduction credits shall be undertaken for the specific purpose of reduction project generated GHG emissions and shall not include reductions that would otherwise be required by law. All Direct Reduction Activities and associated reduction credits shall be confirmed by an independent, qualified third-party.
The “Direct Reduction Activity” shall be registered with a California Air Resources Board (ARB)- approved registry and in compliance with ARB-approved Attachment 6
Attachment 4
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 31 of 33
Mitigation Measure
PD22-04 / PD22-09 / OTR22-06/ PR 22-0022 Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
protocols. In accordance with the applicable Registry requirements, the Project applicant (or its designee) shall retain an independent, qualified third-party to confirm the GHG emissions reduction or sequestration achieved by the Direct GHG Reduction Activities against the applicable Registry protocol or methodology. The Project applicant (or its designee) will then apply for issuance of carbon credits in accordance with the applicable Registry rules.
Carbon Offsets
Obtain and retire “Carbon Offsets.” Carbon Offsets shall achieve GHG reductions that are real, permanent, quantifiable, verifiable, and enforceable. Carbon offsets shall be purchased from ARB approved registries and shall comply with ARB-approved protocols to ensure that offset credits accurately and reliably represent actual emissions reductions. If the purchase of carbon offsets is selected, offsets shall be purchased according to the City of San Luis Obispo’s preference, which is, in order of City preference: (1) within the City of San Luis Obispo; (2) within the SLOAPCD jurisdictional area; (3) within the State of California; then (4) elsewhere in the United States. In the event that a project or program providing offsets to the project applicant loses its accreditation, the project applicant shall comply with the rules and procedures of retiring offsets specific to Attachment 6
Attachment 4
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 32 of 33
Mitigation Measure
PD22-04 / PD22-09 / OTR22-06/ PR 22-0022 Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
the registry involved and shall purchase an equivalent number of credits to recoup the loss.
N-1. Each phase of development shall provide a noise
wall or berm of at least 7ft in height at specified locations to mitigate noise:
x For Phase 1, the berm or wall must start at the
eastern setback, and extend a minimum of 210 ft (64m) straight westward along the project’s northern property line. x For Phase 2, the berm or wall must extend along the
westerly property line.
Project CDD X Shown on building
plans.
Prior to issuance of a building permit for each phase.
T-1. For each phase, the project is prohibited from
having outbound distribution trucks between the following times:
• Monday through Thursday: 3 to 6 PM • Friday: 2 to 6 PM • Sunday: 10 AM to 2 PM At the time the Huer Huero Creek Bridge is constructed, there is no longer a prohibition on outbound distribution times.
Ongoing CDD Shown on building
plans.
Ongoing enforcement.
T-2. The applicant of each phase must participate in
one of the following improvements to be constructed
to serve project truck trips:
Project CDD / City
Engineer
Shown on building plans.
Before building permit issuance for each Phase.
Attachment 6
Attachment 4
Mitigation Monitoring Program – Page 33 of 33
Mitigation Measure
PD22-04 / PD22-09 / OTR22-06/ PR 22-0022 Type
Monitoring
Department or
Agency
Shown on
Plans
Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
• Extend the eastbound median acceleration lane at the
SR 46 E/Airport Road intersection and require trucks to use Airport Road; or • Accommodate westbound U-turns for STAA trucks on
SR 46 E with Caltrans approval; or
• Construct a Huer Huero Creek Bridge (by others) and
require trucks to use Golden Hill Road. Truck levels to be evaluated after occupancy and construction of the bridge prior to removing the time restrictions listed above.
T-3. The applicant of each phase will be required to
participate in an agreement to share costs associated with construction and maintenance of other affected local roads as delineated included in the City’s Development Impact Fees Project CDD / City
Engineer
Shown on building plans.
Before building permit issuance for each Phase.
(add additional measures as necessary) Explanation of Headings: Type: ............................................................ Project, ongoing, cumulative Monitoring Department or Agency: ........ Department or Agency responsible for monitoring a particular mitigation measure Shown on Plans: ......................................... When a mitigation measure is shown on the plans, this column will be initialed and dated.
Verified Implementation: .......................... When a mitigation measure has been implemented, this column will be initialed and dated.
Remarks: ...................................................... Area for describing status of ongoing mitigation measure, or for other information.
Attachment 6
$,548$/,7<
*5((1+286(*$6
, 03$&7$66(660(17
) 25
7 +(675$9,16.,'$28
:$5(+286(63 52-(&7
3 $62 5 2%/(6 &$
'(&(0%(5
35(3$5('%<
75 HIGUERA STREET, SUITE 105
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Proposed Project Summary ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 Air Quality......................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Existing Setting............................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Topography............................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Local and Regional Meteorology ........................................................................................................................................ 1 Atmospheric Stability and Dispersion ................................................................................................................................... 3 Criteria Air Pollutants.............................................................................................................................................................. 5 Human Health & Welfare Effects.......................................................................................................................................... 5 Odors ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Toxic Air Contaminants ......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Asbestos ................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Ambient Air Quality ............................................................................................................................................................... 7 Air Quality Index..................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Regulatory Framework............................................................................................................................................................. 10 Federal ................................................................................................................................................................................. 10 State...................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Local ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 13 Impact Analysis......................................................................................................................................................................... 13 Thresholds of Significance................................................................................................................................................... 13 Methodology ....................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures......................................................................................................................... 16 Greenhouse Gases and Climate Change .................................................................................................................................. 29 Existing Setting........................................................................................................................................................................... 29 Regulatory Framework............................................................................................................................................................. 33 Federal ................................................................................................................................................................................. 33 State...................................................................................................................................................................................... 33 Impact Analysis......................................................................................................................................................................... 38 Thresholds of Significance................................................................................................................................................... 38 Methodology ....................................................................................................................................................................... 39 Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures......................................................................................................................... 40 References..................................................................................................................................................................................... 46
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Common Pollutants & Adverse Effects............................................................................................................................ 5 Table 2. Summary of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Data ......................................................................................................... 7 Table 3. Air Quality Index Summary for Ozone & Related Health Effects................................................................................... 8 Table 4. Air Quality Index Summary for Fine Particulate Matter & Related Health Effects ...................................................... 9 Table 5. Air Quality Index Annual Historical Summary .................................................................................................................. 9 Table 6. Summary of Ambient Air Quality Standards & Attainment Designations ................................................................... 12 Table 7. SLOAPCD Thresholds of Significance for Project-Level Construction Impacts ........................................................... 14 Table 8. SLOAPCD Thresholds of Significance for Project-Level Operational Impacts ............................................................ 14 Table 9. Project Consistency with SLOAPCD’s CAP Transportation and Land Use Control Measures................................... 17 Table 10. Daily Construction Emissions without Mitigation.......................................................................................................... 18 Table 11. Quarterly Construction Emissions Without Mitigation.................................................................................................. 19 Table 12. Construction Emissions with Mitigation ........................................................................................................................ 21 Table 13. Quarterly Construction Emissions With Mitigation1 ...................................................................................................... 21 Table 14. Operational Emissions Without Mitigation ................................................................................................................... 22 Table 15. Operational Emissions With Mitigation......................................................................................................................... 25 Table 16. Global Warming Potential for Greenhouse Gases ..................................................................................................... 30 Table 17. City of Paso Robles GHG Emissions Inventories........................................................................................................... 31 Table 18. Project-Level GHG Efficiency Threshold Calculation.................................................................................................. 39 Table 19. Construction-Generated GHG Emissions Without Mitigation..................................................................................... 40 Table 20. Operational GHG Emissions Without Mitigation.......................................................................................................... 41 Table 21. Project Consistency with the City’s Climate Action Plan........................................................................................... 45
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 . Proposed Site Plan........................................................................................................................................................... 2 Figure 2. Paso Robles Municipal Airport Wind Rose Plot............................................................................................................... 4 Figure 3. California GHG Emissions Inventory by Sector & Subsector (2019) ............................................................................ 31 Figure 4. California Black Carbon Emissions Inventory (Year 2013) ........................................................................................... 32 Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
APPENDICES
Appendix A: Summary of Asbestos NESHAP Requirements
Appendix B: Emissions Modeling
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
LIST OF COMMON TERMS & ACRONYMS
AAQS Ambient Air Quality Standards
AB Assembly Bill
ACM Asbestos-Containing Material
APS Alternative Planning Strategy
ARB California Air Resources Board
BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District
C2F6 Perfluoroethane
C4F10 Perfluorobutane
C4F8 Perfluorocyclobutane
C5F12 Perfluoropentane
C6F14 Perfluorohexane
CAAQS California Ambient Air Quality Standards
CalEEMod California Emissions Estimator Model
CalEPA California Environmental Protection Agency
CBC California Building Code
CCAA California Clean Air Act
CCR California Code of Regulations
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CF4 Perfluoromethane
CH4 Methane
CMP Congestion Management Program
CNG Compressed Natural Gas
CO Carbon Monoxide
CO2 Carbon Dioxide
CO2e Carbon Dioxide Equivalent
DPM Diesel-Exhaust Particulate Matter or Diesel-Exhaust PM EIR Environmental Impact Report
EV Electric Vehicle
FCAA Federal Clean Air Act
GHG Greenhouse Gases
GWP Global Warming Potential
HAP Hazardous Air Pollutant
HFC Hydrofluorocarbons
ITE Institute of Transportation Engineers
LNG Liquefied Natural Gas
LOS Level of Service
MBARD Monterey Bay Air Resources District
MMT Million Metric Tons
MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization
MTCO2e Million Metric Tons of Carbon Dioxide
N2O Nitrous Oxide
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NESHAPs National Emission Standards for HAPs
NF3 Nitrogen Trifluoride
NHTSA National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
NO2 Nitrogen Dioxide
NOA Naturally-Occurring Asbestos
NOx Oxides of Nitrogen
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
O3 Ozone
Pb Lead
PFC Perfluorocarbons
PM Particulate Matter
PM10 Particulate Matter (less than 10 μm)
PM2.5 Particulate Matter (less than 2.5 μm)
ppb Parts per Billion
ppm Parts per Million
PV Photovoltaic
ROC Reactive Organic Compounds
ROG Reactive Organic Gases
RTP Regional Transportation Plan
SAFE Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient
SB Senate Bill
SBCAPCD Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District SMAQMD Sacrament Metropolitan Air Quality Management District SCS Sustainable Communities Strategy
SF6 Sulfur Hexafluoride
SLOCOG San Luis Obispo Council of Governments
SLCP Short-lived Climate Pollutant
SMAQMD Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District SO2 Sulfur Dioxide
SP Service Population
TAC Toxic Air Contaminant
U.S. EPA United State Environmental Protection Agency
VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled
μg/m3 Micrograms per cubic meter
μm Micrometer
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
1 ,1752'8&7,21
This report provides an analysis of air quality and greenhouse gas impacts associated with the proposed redevelopment of the proposed Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project (project). This report also provides a summary of existing conditions in the project area and the applicable regulatory framework pertaining to air quality and climate change.
352326('352-(&76800$5<
The proposed project includes development of an approximate 194,304 square foot (sf) refrigerated warehouse for wine distribution by Stravinski Development Group and an approximate 181,211 sf wine production and storage warehouse for Daou Winery. The project does not include any public tasting rooms, event centers, retail operations, or any other use that would be open to the public. The proposed project’s site plan is depicted in Figure 1.
$,548$/,7<
([LVWLQJ6HWWLQJ
The project is located in the City of Paso Robles, within the South Central Coast Air Basin (SCCAB) and within the jurisdiction of the San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District (SLOAPCD). Air quality in the SCCAB is influenced by a variety of factors, including topography, local and regional meteorology. 7RSRJUDSK\
The City of Paso Robles sits on the rolling hills of the eastern side of the Santa Lucia Mountain Range. It is bounded on the northwest by the Santa Lucia Mountain Range, which extends almost the entire length of the county. Rising sharply to about 3,000 feet at its northern boundary, the Santa Lucia Range gradually winds southward away from the coast, finally merging into a mass of rugged features on the north side of Cuyama Canyon. Point Buchon juts into the Pacific just south of Morro Bay to form the protective harbor of San Luis Obispo Bay. The Irish Hills are the dominant feature on this knob of land, rising abruptly from the shore to form steep cliffs and generally complex terrain from the Los Osos/Montana de Oro State Park area to Pismo Beach. These headlands have a pronounced influence on local wind flow patterns.
Estuaries are also a notable feature of the coastal areas, occurring wherever flowing streams meet the ocean. Morro Bay contains the region's largest estuary, with a saltwater marsh located on the east side where Chorro and Los Osos creeks enter the bay. This is one of the most significant wetlands remaining on the California coast and has been designated part of the National Estuary Program. It provides nesting habitat for blue herons, cranes and other important types of woodland birds and wildlife. Smaller coastal lagoons and marshes are also scattered along the county's shoreline. /RFDODQG5HJLRQDO0HWHRURORJ\
The climate of the county can be generally characterized as Mediterranean, with warm, dry summers and cooler, relatively damp winters. Along the coast, mild temperatures are the rule throughout the year due to the moderating influence of the Pacific Ocean. This effect is diminished inland in proportion to the distance from the ocean or by major intervening terrain features, such as the coastal mountain ranges. As a result, inland areas are characterized by a considerably wider range of temperature conditions. Maximum summer temperatures average about 70 degrees Fahrenheit near the coast, while inland valleys are often in the high 90s. Minimum winter temperatures average from the low 30s along the coast to the low 20s inland (SLOAPCD 2001).
Regional meteorology is largely dominated by a persistent high-pressure area which commonly resides over the eastern Pacific Ocean. Seasonal variations in the strength and position of this pressure cell cause seasonal changes in the weather patterns of the area. The Pacific High remains generally fixed several hundred miles offshore from May through September, enhancing onshore winds and opposing offshore winds.
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
2 )LJXUH3URSRVHG6LWH3ODQ
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
3 During spring and early summer, as the onshore breezes pass over the cool water of the ocean, fog and low clouds often form in the marine air layer along the coast. Surface heating in the interior valleys dissipates the marine layer as it moves inland (SLOAPCD 2001).
From November through April the Pacific High tends to migrate southward, allowing northern storms to move across the county. About 90 percent of the total annual rainfall is received during this period. Winter conditions are usually mild, with intermittent periods of precipitation followed by mostly clear days. Rainfall amounts can vary considerably among different regions in the county. In the Coastal Plain, annual rainfall averages 16 to 28 inches, while the Upper Salinas River Valley generally receives about 12 to 20 inches of rain. The Carrizo Plain is the driest area of the county with less than 12 inches of rain in a typical year (SLOAPCD 2001).
Airflow around the county plays an important role in the movement and dispersion of pollutants. The speed and direction of local winds are controlled by the location and strength of the Pacific High-pressure system and other global patterns, by topographical factors, and by circulation patterns resulting from temperature differences between the land and sea. In spring and summer months, when the Pacific High attains its greatest strength, onshore winds from the northwest generally prevail during the day. At night, as the sea breeze dies, weak drainage winds flow down the coastal mountains and valleys to form a light, easterly land breeze (SLOAPCD 2001).
In the Fall, onshore surface winds decline and the marine layer grows shallow, allowing an occasional reversal to a weak offshore flow. This, along with the diurnal alternation of land-sea breeze circulation, can sometimes produce a "sloshing" effect. Under these conditions, pollutants may accumulate over the ocean for a period of one or more days and are subsequently carried back onshore with the return of the sea breeze. Strong inversions can form at this time, "trapping" pollutants near the surface (SLOAPCD 2001).
This effect is intensified when the Pacific High weakens or moves inland to the east. This may produce a "Santa Ana" condition in which air, often pollutant-laden, is transported into the county from the east and southeast.
This can occur over a period of several days until the high-pressure system returns to its normal location, breaking the pattern. The breakup of a Santa Ana condition may result in relatively stagnant conditions and a buildup of pollutants offshore. The onset of the typical daytime sea breeze can bring these pollutants back onshore, where they combine with local emissions to cause high pollutant concentrations. Not all occurrences of the "post-Santa Ana" condition lead to high ambient pollutant levels, but it does play an important role in the air pollution meteorology of the county (SLOAPCD 2001).
Predominant wind flow in the project area, based on historical meteorological data from the Paso Robles Municipal Airport, is depicted in Figure 2. As depicted, wind flow in the project area is predominantly from the northwest, averaging approximately 6.5 mph. Calm winds are present an average of approximately 27.3 percent of the time.
$WPRVSKHULF6WDELOLW\DQG'LVSHUVLRQ
Air pollutant concentrations are primarily determined by the amount of pollutant emissions in an area and the degree to which these pollutants are dispersed into the atmosphere. The stability of the atmosphere is one of the key factors affecting pollutant dispersion. Atmospheric stability regulates the amount of vertical and horizontal air exchange or mixing, that can occur within a given air basin. Restricted mixing and low wind speeds are generally associated with a high degree of stability in the atmosphere. These conditions are characteristic of temperature inversions (SLOAPCD 2001).
In the atmosphere, air temperatures normally decrease as altitude increases. At varying distances above the earth's surface, however, a reversal of this gradient can occur. This condition termed an inversion, is simply a warm layer of air above a layer of cooler air, and it has the effect of limiting the vertical dispersion of pollutants. The height of the inversion determines the size of the mixing volume trapped below. Inversion strength or intensity is measured by the thickness of the layer and the difference in temperature between the base and the top of the inversion. The strength of the inversion determines how easily it can be broken by winds or solar heating (SLOAPCD 2001).
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
4 )LJXUH3DVR5REOHV0XQLFLSDO$LUSRUW:LQG5RVH3ORW Several types of inversions are common to this area. Weak, surface inversions are caused by radiational cooling of air in contact with the cold surface of the earth at night. In valleys and low lying areas, this condition is intensified by the addition of cold air flowing downslope from the hills and pooling on the valley floor. Surface inversions are a common occurrence throughout the county during the winter, particularly on cold mornings when the inversion is strongest. As the morning sun warms the earth and the air near the ground, the inversion lifts, gradually dissipating as the day progresses. During the late spring and early summer months, cool air over the ocean can intrude under the relatively warmer air over land, causing a marine inversion. These inversions can restrict dispersion along the coast, but they are typically shallow and will dissipate with surface heating (SLOAPCD 2001).
In contrast, in the summertime, the presence of the Pacific high-pressure cell can cause the air mass aloft to sink. As the air descends, compressional heating warms it to a temperature higher than the air below. This highly stable atmospheric condition, termed a subsidence inversion, is common to all of coastal California and can act as a nearly impenetrable lid to the vertical mixing of pollutants. The base of the inversion typically ranges from 1000 to 2500 feet above sea level; however, levels as low as 250 feet, among the lowest anywhere in the state, have been recorded on the coastal plateau in San Luis Obispo county. The strength of these inversions makes them difficult to disrupt. Consequently, they can persist for one or more days, causing air stagnation and the buildup of pollutants. Highest or worst-case ozone levels are often associated with the presence of this type of inversion (SLOAPCD 2001).
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
5 &ULWHULD$LU3ROOXWDQWV
For the protection of public health and welfare, the Clean Air Act (CAA) required that the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) establish National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for various pollutants. These pollutants are referred to as "criteria" pollutants because the US EPA publishes criteria documents to justify the choice of standards. These standards define the maximum amount of an air pollutant that can be present in ambient air without harm to the public’s health. An ambient air quality standard is generally specified as a concentration averaged over a specific time period, such as one hour, eight hours, 24 hours, or one year. The different averaging times and concentrations are meant to protect against different exposure effects. The CAA allows states to adopt additional or more health-protective standards. The air quality regulatory framework and ambient air quality standards are discussed in greater detail later in this report.
+XPDQ+HDOWK :HOIDUH(IIHFWV
Common air pollutants and associated adverse health and welfare effects are summarized in Table 1. Within the SCCAB, the air pollutants of primary concern, with regard to human health, include ozone, particulate matter (PM) and carbon monoxide (CO). As depicted in Table 1, exposure to increased pollutant concentrations of ozone, PM and CO can result in various heart and lung ailments, cardiovascular and nervous system impairment, and death.
7DEOH&RPPRQ3ROOXWDQWV $GYHUVH(IIHFWV
Pollutant Human Health & Welfare Effects
Particulate Matter
(PM10 & PM2.5)
Increased respiratory symptoms, such as irritation of the airways, coughing, or difficulty breathing; aggravated asthma; development of chronic bronchitis; irregular heartbeat; nonfatal heart attacks; and premature death in people with heart or lung disease. Impairs visibility (haze).
Ozone
(O3)
Irritates and causes inflammation of the mucous membranes and lung airways; causes wheezing, coughing and pain when inhaling deeply; decreases lung capacity; aggravates lung and heart problems. Damages plants; reduces crop yield. Damages rubber, some textiles, and dyes.
Sulfur Dioxide
(SO2)
Respiratory irritant. Aggravates lung and heart problems. In the presence of moisture and oxygen, sulfur dioxide converts to sulfuric acid which can damage marble, iron and steel; damage crops and natural vegetation. Impairs visibility. A precursor to acid rain.
Carbon Monoxide
(CO)
Reduces the ability of blood to deliver oxygen to vital tissues, effecting the cardiovascular and nervous system. Impairs vision, causes dizziness, and can lead to unconsciousness or death.
Nitrogen Dioxide
(NO2)
Respiratory irritant; aggravates lung and heart problems. A precursor to ozone and acid rain.
Contributes to global warming, and nutrient overloading which deteriorates water quality.
Causes brown discoloration of the atmosphere.
Lead Anemia, high blood pressure, brain and kidney damage, neurological disorders, cancer, lowered IQ. Affects animals, plants, and aquatic ecosystems.
Source: ARB 2018
2GRUV
Typically, odors are generally regarded as an annoyance rather than a health hazard. However, manifestations of a person’s reaction to foul odors can range from the psychological (i.e. irritation, anger, or anxiety) to the physiological, including circulatory and respiratory effects, nausea, vomiting, and headache.
Neither the state nor the federal governments have adopted rules or regulations for the control of odor sources. The SLOAPCD does not have an individual rule or regulation that specifically addresses odors; however, odors would be applicable to SLOAPCD’s Rule 402, Nuisance. Any actions related to odors would be based on citizen complaints to local governments and the SLOAPCD. The SLOAPCD recommends that odor impacts be addressed in a qualitative manner. Such analysis shall determine if the project results in Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
6 excessive nuisance odors, as defined under the California Code of Regulations, Health & Safety Code Section 41700, air quality public nuisance.
7R[LF$LU&RQWDPLQDQWV
Toxic air contaminants (TACs) are air pollutants that may cause or contribute to an increase in mortality or serious illness, or which may pose a hazard to human health. TACs are usually present in minute quantities in the ambient air, but due to their high toxicity, they may pose a threat to public health even at very low concentrations. Because there is no threshold level below which adverse health impacts are not expected to occur, TACs differ from criteria pollutants for which acceptable levels of exposure can be determined and for which state and federal governments have set ambient air quality standards. TACs, therefore, are not considered “criteria pollutants” under either the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) or the California Clean Air Act (CCAA) and are thus not subject to National or State AAQS. TACs are not considered criteria pollutants in that the federal and California Clean Air Acts do not address them specifically through the setting of National or State AAQS. Instead, the U.S. EPA and California Air Resources Board (ARB) regulate Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) and TACs, respectively, through statutes and regulations that generally require the use of the maximum or best available control technology to limit emissions. In conjunction with District rules, these federal and state statutes and regulations establish the regulatory framework for TACs. At the national levels, the U.S. EPA has established National Emission Standards for HAPs (NESHAPs), in accordance with the requirements of the FCAA and subsequent amendments. These are technology-based source-specific regulations that limit allowable emissions of HAPs.
Within California, TACs are regulated primarily through the Tanner Air Toxics Act (AB 1807) and the Air Toxics Hot Spots Information and Assessment Act of 1987 (AB 2588). The Tanner Act sets forth a formal procedure for ARB to designate substances as TACs. This includes research, public participation, and scientific peer review before ARB designates a substance as a TAC. Existing sources of TACs that are subject to the Air Toxics Hot Spots Information and Assessment Act are required to: (1) prepare a toxic emissions inventory; (2) prepare a risk assessment if emissions are significant; (3) notify the public of significant risk levels; and (4) prepare and implement risk reduction measures.
At the state level, the ARB has authority for the regulation of emissions from motor vehicles, fuels, and consumer products. Most recently, Diesel-exhaust particulate matter (DPM) was added to the ARB list of TACs. DPM is the primary TACs of concern for mobile sources. Of all controlled TACs, emissions of DPM are estimated to be responsible for about 70 percent of the total ambient TAC risk. The ARB has made the reduction of the public’s exposure to DPM one of its highest priorities, with an aggressive plan to require cleaner diesel fuel and cleaner diesel engines and vehicles (ARB 2005).
At the local level, air districts have authority over stationary or industrial sources. All projects that require air quality permits from the SLOAPCD are evaluated for TAC emissions. The SLOAPCD limits emissions and public exposure to TACs through a number of programs. The SLOAPCD prioritizes TAC-emitting stationary sources, based on the quantity and toxicity of the TAC emissions and the proximity of the facilities to sensitive receptors. The SLOAPCD requires a comprehensive health risk assessment for facilities that are classified in the significant-risk category, pursuant to AB 2588. No major existing sources of TACs have been identified in the project area.
$VEHVWRV
Asbestos is the common name for a group of naturally-occurring fibrous silicate minerals that can separate into thin but strong and durable fibers. Naturally-occurring asbestos, which was identified as a TAC in 1986 by ARB, is located in many parts of California and is commonly associated with ultramafic rock. The project site is not located within an area identified as having a potential for naturally-occurring ultramafic rock and serpentine soils.
Asbestos-containing material may be present in existing structures. The demolition of existing structures may be subject to regulatory requirements for the control of ACM.
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
7 $PELHQW$LU4XDOLW\
Air pollutant concentrations are measured at several monitoring stations in the SCCAB. The Paso RoblesSanta Fe Avenue is the closest representative monitoring station with sufficient data to meet U.S. EPA and/or ARB criteria for quality assurance. Ambient monitoring data was obtained for the last three years of available measurement data (i.e., 2019 through 2021) and is summarized in Table 2. As depicted, the state and federal PM2.5 standards were exceeded for 11 days in 2020. The state standard for PM10 was exceeded on 4 days in 2020. The national standard for 8-hour ozone concentration was exceeded on 2 days in 2020. Measured 1- hour ozone and NO2 concentrations did not exceed the state and federal ambient air quality standards in the last three years of monitoring.
7DEOH6XPPDU\RI$PELHQW$LU4XDOLW\0RQLWRULQJ'DWD Pollutant Monitoring Year
2019 2020 2021
Ozone (O3)(1)
Maximum concentration (1-hour/8-hour average; ppm) 0.077/0.064 0.092/0.073 0.070/0.064 Number of days state/national 1-hour standard exceeded 0/0 0/0 0/0 Number of days state/national 8-hour standard exceeded NA/0 NA/2 NA/0 Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2)(2)
Maximum concentration (1-hour average; ppb) 34.0 33.0 44.0 Number of days state/national standard exceeded 0/0 0/0 0/0 Suspended Particulate Matter (PM2.5)(2)
Maximum 24-hour concentration (national/state; μg/m3) 17.3/17.3 242.1/242.1 19.1/19.1 Number of days national standard exceeded
(measured/calculated)(3) 0/0 11/11.1 0/0
Suspended Particulate Matter (PM10)(1)
Maximum concentration (national/state; μg/m3) 134.4/138.0 367.8/357.2 74.4/74.7 Number of days state standard exceeded
(measured/calculated)(3) 9/NA 35/36 3/3.1
Number of days national standard exceeded
(measured/calculated)(3) 0/0 4/4 0/0
ppm = parts per million by volume, μg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter, NA=Not Available
1. Based on ambient concentrations obtained from the Paso Robles-Santa Fe Avenue. Monitoring Station.
2. Based on ambient concentrations obtained from the Atascadero-Lift Station #5 Monitoring Station.
3. Measured days are those days that an actual measurement was greater than the standard. Calculated days are estimated days that measurement would have exceeded the standard had measurements been collected every day.
Source: ARB 2021
$LU4XDOLW\,QGH[
The health effects of ambient air pollutant concentrations can be evaluated and presented in various ways.
The most common method is the use of the Air Quality Index (AQI). The U.S. EPA developed the AQI as an easy-to-understand measure of health impacts based on measured ambient air quality in comparison to established ambient air quality standards. Tables 3 and 4 present a summary of the health impacts for ozone and fine particulate matter (PM2.5), respectively, based on the U.S. EPA’s AQI.
A summary of the annual air quality index for the project area, based on monitoring data obtained from the Paso Robles monitoring station for the last three years of available data, is provided in Table 5. As depicted in Table 5, the project area typically experiences "good” air quality with the total number of days ranging from 209 to 230 days per year. Days classified as “moderate” AQI ranged from 104 to 148 days per year. Over the last three years of available data, the area has experience a total of 32 days classified as “Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups”,8 days classified as “Unhealthy”, and 2 days classified as “Very Unhealthy”. Over the past three years, the area has not experienced air quality conditions within the “Hazardous” range (U.S. EPA 2022).
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
8 7DEOH$LU4XDOLW\,QGH[6XPPDU\IRU2]RQH 5HODWHG+HDOWK(IIHFWV Air Quality Index / 8-hour Ozone
Concentration
Health Effects Description
AQI 51-100: Moderate
Ambient Ozone Concentrations: 55-70 ppb
Sensitive Groups: Children and people with asthma are the groups at most risk.
Health Effects Statements: Unusually sensitive individuals may experience respiratory symptoms.
Cautionary Statements: Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting prolonged outdoor exertion.
AQI 101-150: Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups
Ambient Ozone Concentrations: 71-85 ppb
Sensitive Groups: Children and people with asthma are the groups at most risk.
Health Effects Statements: Increasing likelihood of respiratory symptoms and breathing discomfort in active children and adults and people with respiratory disease, such as asthma.
Cautionary Statements: Active children and adults, and people with respiratory disease, such as asthma, should limit prolonged outdoor exertion.
AQI 151–200: Unhealthy
Ambient Ozone Concentrations: 86-105 ppb
Sensitive Groups: Children and people with asthma are the groups at most risk.
Health Effects Statements: Greater likelihood of respiratory symptoms and breathing difficulty in active children and adults and people with respiratory disease, such as asthma; possible respiratory effects in general population.
Cautionary Statements: Active children and adults, and people with respiratory disease, such as asthma, should limit prolonged outdoor exertion; everyone else, especially children, should limit prolonged outdoor exertion.
AQI 201-300: Very Unhealthy
Ambient Ozone Concentrations: 106-200 ppb
Sensitive Groups: Children and people with asthma are the groups at most risk.
Health Effects Statements: Increasingly severe symptoms and impaired breathing likely in active children and adults and people with respiratory disease, such as asthma; increasing likelihood of respiratory effects in general population
Cautionary Statements: Active children and adults, and people with respiratory disease, such as asthma, should avoid outdoor exertion; everyone else, especially children, should limit outdoor exertion.
An AQI of 50 and below is categorized as “Good” and air quality is satisfactory, and poses little or no risk. An AQI of 301 or higher is categorized as “Hazardous” having a health warning of emergency conditions: everyone is more likely to be affected. Outdoor activities should be avoided for all individuals.
Source: U.S. EPA 2022
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
9 7DEOH$LU4XDOLW\,QGH[6XPPDU\IRU)LQH3DUWLFXODWH0DWWHU 5HODWHG+HDOWK(IIHFWV
AIR QUALITY INDEX / 8-HOUR OZONE
CONCENTRATION
Health Effects Description
AQI 51-100: Moderate
Ambient Concentrations: 12.1-35.4 μg/m3
Sensitive Groups: Some people who may be unusually sensitive to particulate
Health Effects Statements: Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion.
Cautionary Statements: Unusually sensitive people: Consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion. Watch for symptoms such as coughing or shortness of breath. These are signs to take it easier.
AQI 101-150: Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups
Ambient Concentrations: 35.5-55.4 μg/m3
Sensitive Groups: People with heart or lung disease, older adults, children, and teenagers.
Health Effects Statements: Increasing likelihood of respiratory symptoms for sensitive individuals, aggravation of heart or lung disease and premature mortality in persons with cardiopulmonary disease, and the elderly.
Cautionary Statements: If you have heart disease: Symptoms such as palpations, shortness of breath, or unusual fatigue may indicate a serious problem. If you have any of these, contact a health care provider.
AQI 151–200: Unhealthy
Ambient Concentrations: 55.5-150.4 μg/m3
Sensitive Groups: Everyone.
Health Effects Statements: Increased aggravation of heart or lung disease and premature mortality in persons with cardiopulmonary disease, and the elderly; increased respiratory effects in general population.
Cautionary Statements: Sensitive groups: Avoid prolonged or heavy exertion. Consider moving activities indoors or rescheduling. Everyone else: Reduce prolonged or heavy exertion. Take more breaks during outdoor activities.
AQI 201-300: Very Unhealthy
Ambient Concentrations: 150.5-250.4 μg/m3
Sensitive Groups: Everyone.
Health Effects Statements: Significant aggravation of heart or lung disease and premature mortality in persons with cardiopulmonary disease, and the elderly; significant increase in respiratory effects in general population.
Cautionary Statements: Sensitive groups: Avoid all physical activity outdoors. Move activities indoors or reschedule to a time when air quality is better. Everyone else: Avoid prolonged or heavy exertion. Consider moving activities indoors or reschedule to a time when air quality is better.
An AQI of 50 and below is categorized as “Good” and air quality is satisfactory, and poses little or no risk. An AQI of 301 or higher is categorized as “Hazardous” having a health warning of emergency conditions: everyone is more likely to be affected. Outdoor activities should be avoided for all individuals.
Source: U.S. EPA 2022
7DEOH$LU4XDOLW\,QGH[$QQXDO+LVWRULFDO6XPPDU\
Year
Air Quality Index (AQI) - Number of Days
Good Moderate
Unhealthy for
Sensitive
Groups Unhealthy
Very
Unhealthy Hazardous
2021 209 148 8 0 0 0
2020 211 124 21 8 2 0
2019 230 132 3 0 0 0
Based on monitoring for the Paso Robles monitoring station. Represents overall air quality taking into account all criteria pollutants measured.
Source: U.S, EPA 2022
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
10 5HJXODWRU\)UDPHZRUN
Air quality within the SCCAB is regulated by several jurisdictions including the U.S. EPA, ARB, and the SLOAPCD.
Each of these jurisdictions develops rules, regulations, and policies to attain the goals or directives imposed upon them through legislation.
)HGHUDO
86(19,5210(17$/3527(&7,21$*(1&<
At the federal level, the U.S. EPA has been charged with implementing national air quality programs. The U.S.
EPA’s air quality mandates are drawn primarily from the FCAA, which was signed into law in 1970. Congress substantially amended the FCAA in 1977 and again in 1990. )('(5$/&/($1$,5$&7
The FCAA required the US EPA to establish National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS or National AAQS), and also set deadlines for their attainment. Two types of NAAQS have been established: primary standards, which protect public health, and secondary standards, which protect public welfare from non-healthrelated adverse effects, such as visibility restrictions. NAAQS are summarized in Table 6. 6WDWH
&$/,)251,$$,55(6285&(6%2$5'
The ARB is the agency responsible for coordination and oversight of state and local air pollution control programs in California and for implementing the CCAA of 1988. Other ARB duties include monitoring air quality (in conjunction with air monitoring networks maintained by air pollution control districts and air quality management districts, establishing California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS), which in many cases are more stringent than the NAAQS, and setting emissions standards for new motor vehicles. The CAAQS are summarized in Table 6. The emission standards established for motor vehicles differ depending on various factors including the model year, and the type of vehicle, fuel, and engine used. &$/,)251,$&/($1$,5$&7
The CCAA requires that all air districts in the state endeavor to achieve and maintain CAAQS for Ozone, CO, SO2, and NO2 by the earliest practicable date. The CCAA specifies that districts focus particular attention on reducing the emissions from transportation and area-wide emission sources, and the act provides districts with authority to regulate indirect sources. Each district plan is required to either (1) achieve a five percent annual reduction, averaged over consecutive 3-year periods, in district-wide emissions of each nonattainment pollutant or its precursors, or (2) to provide for the implementation of all feasible measures to reduce emissions. Any planning effort for air quality attainment would thus need to consider both state and federal planning requirements.
$66(0%/<%,//6 72;,&$,5&217$0,1$176
Within California, TACs are regulated primarily through AB 1807 (Tanner Air Toxics Act) and AB 2588 (Air Toxics Hot Spots Information and Assessment Act of 1987). The Tanner Air Toxics Act sets forth a formal procedure for ARB to designate substances as TACs. This includes research, public participation, and scientific peer review before ARB designates a substance as a TAC. Existing sources of TACs that are subject to the Air Toxics Hot Spots Information and Assessment Act are required to: (1) prepare a toxic emissions inventory; (2) prepare a risk assessment if emissions are significant; (3) notify the public of significant risk levels; and (4) prepare and implement risk reduction measures.
,186(2))52$'',(6(/9(+,&/(5(*8/$7,21
On July 26, 2007, the ARB adopted a regulation to reduce DPM and NOx emissions from in-use (existing) offroad heavy-duty diesel vehicles in California. The regulation applies to self-propelled diesel-fueled vehicles that cannot be registered and licensed to drive on-road, as well as two-engine vehicles that drive on road, Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
11 with the limited exception of two-engine sweepers. Examples include loaders, crawler tractors, skid steers, backhoes, forklifts, airport ground support equipment, water well drilling rigs, and two-engine cranes. Such vehicles are used in construction, mining, and industrial operations. The regulation does not apply to stationary equipment or portable equipment such as generators. The off-road vehicle regulation establishes emissions performance requirements, reporting, disclosure, and labeling requirements for off-road vehicles, and limits unnecessary idling.
&$/,)251,$%8,/',1*&2'(
The California Building Code (CBC) contains standards that regulate the method of use, properties, performance, or types of materials used in the construction, alteration, improvement, repair, or rehabilitation of a building or other improvement to real property. The California Building Code is adopted every three years by the Building Standards Commission (BSC). In the interim, the BSC also adopts annual updates to make necessary mid-term corrections. The CBC standards apply statewide; however, a local jurisdiction may amend a CBC standard if it makes a finding that the amendment is reasonably necessary due to local climatic, geological, or topographical conditions.
*5((1%8,/',1*67$1'$5'6
In essence, green buildings standards are indistinguishable from any other building standards. Both standards are contained in the California Building Code and regulate the construction of new buildings and improvements. The only practical distinction between the two is that whereas the focus of traditional building standards has been protecting public health and safety, the focus of green building standards is to improve environmental performance.
AB 32, which mandates the reduction of GHG emissions in California to 1990 levels by 2020, increased the urgency around the adoption of green building standards. In its scoping plan for the implementation of AB 32, ARB identified energy use as the second largest contributor to California’s GHG emissions, constituting roughly 25 percent of all such emissions. In recommending a green building strategy as one element of the scoping plan, ARB estimated that green building standards would reduce GHG emissions by approximately 26 MMT of CO2e by 2020.
The green buildings standards were most recently updated on May 2018. Referred to as the 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, this most recent update focus on four key areas: smart residential photovoltaic systems, updated thermal envelope standards (preventing heat transfer from the interior to the exterior and vice versa), residential and nonresidential ventilation requirements, and nonresidential lighting requirements.
The ventilation measures improve indoor air quality, protecting homeowners from air pollution originating from outdoor and indoor sources. Under the newly adopted standards, nonresidential buildings will use about 30 percent less energy due mainly to lighting upgrades. The recently updated 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards also require new homes built after January 1, 2020 to be equipped with solar photovoltaic (PV) systems. The solar PV systems are to be sized based on the buildings annual electricity demand, the building square footage, and the climate zone within which the home is located. However, under the 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, homes may still rely on other energy sources, such as natural gas. Compliance with the 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, including the solar PV system mandate, residential dwellings will use approximately 50 to 53 percent less energy than those under the 2016 standards. Actual reduction will vary depending on various factors (e.g., building orientation, sun exposure). Non-residential buildings will use about 30 percent less energy due mainly to lighting upgrades (CEC 2019).
The recently updated 2022 Building Energy Efficiency Standards (2022 Standards), which were approved in December 2021, encourages efficient electric heat pumps, establishes electric-ready requirements when natural gas is installed and to support the future installation of battery storage, and further expands solar photovoltaic and battery storage standards. The 2022 Standards extend solar PV system requirements, as well as battery storage capabilities for select land uses, including high-rise multi-family and non-residential land uses, such as office buildings, schools, restaurants, warehouses, theaters, grocery stores, and more.
Depending on the land use and other factors, solar systems should be sized to meet targets of up to 60 percent of the structure’s loads. These new solar requirements will become effective January 1, 2023 and contribute to California’s goal of reaching net-zero carbon footprint by 2045 (CEC 2022).
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
12 7DEOH6XPPDU\RI$PELHQW$LU4XDOLW\6WDQGDUGV $WWDLQPHQW'HVLJQDWLRQV Source: SLOAPCD 2020a
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
13 /RFDO
&2817<2)6$1/8,62%,632$,532//87,21&21752/',675,&7 The SLOAPCD is the agency primarily responsible for ensuring that NAAQS and CAAQS are not exceeded and that air quality conditions within the region are maintained. Responsibilities of the SLOAPCD include, but are not limited to, preparing plans for the attainment of ambient air quality standards, adopting and enforcing rules and regulations concerning sources of air pollution, issuing permits for stationary sources of air pollution, inspecting stationary sources of air pollution and responding to citizen complaints, monitoring ambient air quality and meteorological conditions, and implementing programs and regulations required by the FCAA and the CCAA.
&,7<2)3$6252%/(6
The City of Paso Roble’s General Plan includes numerous policies related to air quality. These policies address emissions generated by mobile and non-mobile sources and land use compatibility. The General Plan includes the following policies related to air quality:
x Circulation Element - Policy CE-1A. Circulation Master Plan. Revise/update the City’s Circulation Master Plan to address the mobility needs of all users of the streets, roads and highways including motorists, movers of commercial goods, seniors, children, pedestrians, disabled persons, users of public transportation, and bicyclists.
x Circulation Element - Policy CE-1B. Reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). The City shall strive to reduce VMT generated per household per weekday by making efficient use of existing transportation facilities and by providing direct routes for pedestrians and bicyclists through the implementation of sustainable planning principles.
x Circulation Element - Policy CE-1C. Airport. Improve/expand transportation to and from the Paso Robles Municipal Airport as set forth in the Airport Master Plan x Circulation Element - Policy CE-1D. Transit. Improve and expand transit services. x Circulation Element - Policy CE-1E. Rail. Promote regional, interstate and intra-state rail service. x Circulation Element - Policy CE-1F. Pedestrian and Bicycle Access. Provide safe and convenient pedestrian and bicycle access to all areas of the City. x Conservation Element - Policy C-2A. Traffic Congestion Reduction. Implement circulation systems improvements to reduce congestion and associated air contaminant emissions. x Conservation Element - Policy C-2B. VMT Reduction. Implement programs to reduce the number of VMT, especially by single occupant vehicles, including providing opportunities for mixed-use projects.
x Conservation Element - Policy C-2C. Emissions Reduction. Take steps to reduce creation of air contaminant emissions.
,PSDFW$QDO\VLV
7KUHVKROGVRI6LJQLILFDQFH
In accordance with Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines, air quality impacts associated with the proposed project would be considered significant if it would:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan. b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people.
To assist in the evaluation of air quality impacts, the SLOAPCD has developed recommended significance thresholds, which are contained in the SLOAPCD’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook (2012). For the purposes of this analysis, project emissions are considered potentially significant impacts if any of the following SLOAPCD thresholds are exceeded:
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
14 Construction Impacts
The threshold criteria established by the SLOAPCD to determine the significance and appropriate mitigation level for a project’s short-term construction emissions are presented in Table 7 and discussed, as follows (SLOAPCD 2012):
7DEOH6/2$3&'7KUHVKROGVRI6LJQLILFDQFHIRU3URMHFW/HYHO&RQVWUXFWLRQ,PSDFWV Pollutant
Threshold (1)
Daily (lbs/day) Quarterly Tier 1
(tons)
Quarterly Tier 2
(tons)
Ozone Precursors (ROG + NOX) 137 2.5 6.3
Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM) 7 0.13 0.32
Fugitive Particulate Matter (PM10), Dust (2) -- 2.5 --
1. Daily and quarterly emissions thresholds are based on the California Health & Safety Code and the ARB Carl Moyer Guidelines.
2. Any project with a grading area greater than 4.0 acres of a worked area can exceed the 2.5 tons PM10 quarterly threshold.
Source: SLOAPCD 2012
ROG and NOx Emissions
Daily: For construction projects exceeding the 137 lbs/day threshold requires Standard Mitigation Measures; Quarterly – Tier 1: For construction projects exceeding the 2.5 tons/quarter threshold, require Standard Mitigation Measures and Best Available Control Technology (BACT) for construction equipment. Off-site mitigation may be required if feasible mitigation measures are not implemented, or if no mitigation measures are feasible for the project.
Quarterly – Tier 2: For construction projects exceeding the 6.3 tons/quarter threshold, require Standard Mitigation Measures, BACT, implementation of a Construction Activity Management Plan (CAMP) and offsite mitigation are required.
Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM) Emissions
Daily: For construction projects exceeding the 7 lbs/day threshold, require Standard Mitigation Measures; Quarterly - Tier 1: For construction projects lasting more than one quarter, exceedance of the 0.13 tons/quarter threshold requires Standard Mitigation Measures, BACT for construction equipment; and, Quarterly - Tier 2: For construction projects exceeding the 0.32 tons/quarter threshold, require Standard Mitigation Measures, BACT, implementation of a CAMP, and off-site mitigation.
Fugitive Particulate Matter (PM10), Dust Emissions
Quarterly- Tier 1: For construction projects exceeding the 2.5 tons/quarter threshold requires Fugitive PM10 Mitigation Measures and may require the implementation of a CAMP.
Operational Impacts
Criteria Air Pollutants
The threshold criteria established by the SLOAPCD to determine the significance and appropriate mitigation level for long-term operational emissions from a project are presented in Table 8. 7DEOH6/2$3&'7KUHVKROGVRI6LJQLILFDQFHIRU3URMHFW/HYHO2SHUDWLRQDO,PSDFWV Pollutant Threshold 1
Daily (lbs/day) Annual (tons/year)
Ozone Precursors (ROG + NOX) 25 25
Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM)2 1.25 --
Fugitive Particulate Matter (PM10), Dust 25 25
CO 550 --
1. Daily and annual emissions thresholds are based on the California Health & Safety Code Division 26, Part 3, Chapter 10, Section 40918 and the ARB Carl Moyer Guidelines for DPM.
2. Applies to on-site emissions. DPM is seldom emitted from individual projects in quantities which lead to local or regional air quality attainment violations.
Source: SLOAPCD 2012
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
15 Toxic Air Contaminants
If a project has the potential to emit toxic or hazardous air pollutants, or is located in close proximity to sensitive receptors, impacts may be considered significant due to increased cancer risk for the affected population, even at a very low level of emissions. For the evaluation of new proposed land use projects that generate toxic air contaminants, such as diesel-fueled engines, the SLOAPCD has defined the excess cancer risk significance threshold at 10 in a million.
Localized CO Concentrations
Localized CO concentrations associated with the proposed project would be considered a less-thansignificant impact if: (1) Traffic generated by the proposed project would not result in deterioration of signalized intersection level of service (LOS) to LOS E or F; or (2) the project would not contribute additional traffic to a signalized intersection that already operates at LOS of E or F (Caltrans 1996).
Odors
Screening of potential odor impacts is typically recommended for the following two situations:
x Projects that would potentially generate odorous emissions proposed to locate near existing sensitive receptors or other land uses where people may congregate; and x Residential or other sensitive receptor projects or other projects that may attract people locating near existing odor sources.
If the proposed project would locate receptors and known odor sources within one mile of each other, a full analysis of odor impacts is recommended. Known odor sources of primary concern, as identified by the SLOAPCD include landfills, transfer stations, asphalt batch plants, rendering plants, petroleum refineries, and painting/coating operations, as well as, composting, food processing, wastewater treatment, chemical manufacturing, and feedlot/dairy facilities.
0HWKRGRORJ\
Emissions associated with the construction of the proposed project were calculated using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod), version 2020.4.0 computer program. To be conservative, construction of the proposed warehouses were assumed to occur simultaneously. Construction phase durations were based on model defaults, with the exception of the building construction phase. Based on project-specific information received, building construction would occur over an estimated six-month period. Approximately 5,093 square feet (sf) of existing structure would be demolished. A combined total of approximately 1,510 cubic yards (cy) of fill material would be imported. Additional construction information such as off-road equipment use, worker vehicle trips, and equipment load factors were based on default parameters contained in the model. Modeling assumptions and output files are included in Appendix B of this report.
Long-term operational emissions were calculated using the CalEEMod, version 2020.4.0 based, in part, on vehicle trip-generation rates, vehicle distribution percentages, and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) derived from the traffic analysis prepared for this project (CCTC 2022). Warehouse vehicle trip distances were based on calculated travel distances of 3.7 miles for worker trips and 13 miles for truck trips for a combined average vehicle trip length of 7 miles. Based on vehicle percentages obtained from the traffic analysis, approximately 35 percent of total vehicle trips were assumed to be trucks and the remaining 65 percent were assumed to be light-duty vehicles associated with worker trips. Truck trips were assumed to consist of a mix of mediumheavy-duty trucks (MHDT) and heavy-heavy-duty trucks (HHDT). Worker trips were assumed to be light-duty vehicles defined as a mix of light-duty automobiles (LDA), light-duty trucks (LDT1 and LDT2) and medium-duty trucks (MDT) per ARB’s definition. The default fleet mix identified in CalEEMod was adjusted to reflect this increase in truck trips. All other vehicle categories were based on model defaults. Water and energy usage rates were based on model defaults. Based on information provided by the project applicants, off-road equipment used within both warehouses, such as forklifts, would be electrically powered.
VOC emissions associated with onsite wine fermentation and the proposed wastewater pond were calculated using the winery calculation worksheet obtained from the Monterey Bay Air Resources District (MBARD). The worksheet utilizes ARB’s wine fermentation methodology to estimate ethanol emissions associated with wine fermentation along with methodologies used by other air districts (e.g., San Joaquin Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
16 Valley Air Pollution Control District, Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District) for wine production.
This worksheet also includes estimation of emissions associated with wastewater ponds used in the wine production process (MBARD 2018). Emissions were calculated based on an estimated annual wine production rate of 2,335,800 gallons/year and a wastewater throughput of 3,596,000 gallons/year provided by the project applicant. It is important to note that new or expanding wineries with storage capacity of 26,000 gallons per year, or more, are required to obtain a Permit to Operate from SLOAPCD. Based on the proposed processing rate, proposed wine production processes associated with the Daou warehouse would be subject to SLOAPCD permitting requirements. Emission modeling assumptions and results are included in Appendix B.
3URMHFW,PSDFWVDQG0LWLJDWLRQ0HDVXUHV
Impact AQ-A. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? SLOAPCD Clean Air Plan
As part of the CCAA, the SLOAPCD is required to develop a plan to achieve and maintain the state ozone standard by the earliest practicable date. The SLOAPCD’s 2001 Clean Air Plan (CAP) addresses the attainment and maintenance of state and federal ambient air quality standards. The CAP was adopted by SLOAPCD’s on March 26, 2002.
The SLOAPCD’s CAP outlines the District's strategies to reduce ozone-precursor pollutants (i.e., ROG and NOX) from a wide variety of sources. The SLOAPCD’s CAP includes a stationary-source control program, which includes control measures for permitted stationary sources; as well as transportation and land use management strategies to reduce motor vehicle emissions and use. The stationary-source control program is administered by SLOAPCD. Transportation and land use control measures are implemented at the local or regional level, by promoting and facilitating the use of alternative transportation options, increased pedestrian access and accessibility to community services and local destinations, reductions in vehicle miles traveled, and promotion of congestion management efforts. In addition, local jurisdictions also prepare population forecasts, which are used by SLOAPCD to forecast population-related emissions and air quality attainment, including those contained in the SLOAPCD’s CAP. As a result, consistency with the SLOAPCD’s CAP has been evaluated based on the proposed project’s consistency with the land use management strategies and transportation control measures identified in the CAP. This analysis also provides an analysis of regional vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and consistency with regional VMT-reduction efforts. Regional VMT estimates are relied upon for regional air quality planning purposes. Regional VMT and growth projections are used to determine the strategies to be implemented sufficient to reach the emission reduction targets set by the California Air Resources Board through SB 375 which is transportation legislation that supports the broader 2030 emission reduction targets required in SB 32.
Transportation and Land Use Control Measures
The SLOAPCD’s CAP includes multiple transportation and land use control measures intended to reduce emissions through reductions in VMT and the promotion of alternative forms of transportation. The control measures applicable to the proposed project are summarized in Table 9. As noted the proposed project would be considered consistent with these applicable measures.
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
17 7DEOH
3URMHFW&RQVLVWHQF\ZLWK6/2$3&'¶V&$37UDQVSRUWDWLRQ DQG/DQG8VH&RQWURO0HDVXUHV
Control Measures Project Consistency
Land Use Planning Strategies
L-3 Balancing Jobs and Housing.
x Within cities and unincorporated communities, the gap between the availability of jobs and housing should be
narrowed and should not be allowed to expand.
Consistent. The proposed project is located within the
City’s limits and would not result in the development
of residential land uses. The project would, however,
result in the creation of new jobs, which would help to reduce the gap between jobs and housing.
Improvements in a jobs-to-housing imbalance would
be anticipated to help support and promote local
and regional improvements related to increased
transportation mobility and potential reductions in
VMT (SLOCOG 2019). The proposed project would be
consistent with this measure.
Transportation Control Measures
T-2B Regional Public Transit Improvements.
x The goal of this measure is to improve transit service and facilities that will promote increased public transit use instead of a private automobile.
Consistent with Mitigation Incorporated.
x Existing transit services do not have a route that
passes the project location.
x The Project supports the use of bicycle and
pedestrian access. Mitigation Measure AQ-3
would require implementation of additional
measures to reduce operational emissions,
including the installation of bicycle storage in
exceedance of current building code
requirements.
T-3 Bicycling and Bikeway Enhancements.
x The goal of this measure is to encourage a modal shift to bicycles through implementation of infrastructure
improvements and administrative actions that provide
inexpensive commute options and increased safety and
convenience for commuters.
T-8 Teleworking, Teleconferencing, and Telelearning.
x The objective of this measure is to reduce the number of trips and miles traveled by employees and students by
promoting teleworking, tele-conferencing and
telelearning.
x Mitigation Measure AQ-3 includes measures to
promote reductions in worker VMT.
Projected Population, Employment & VMT Growth
The project would not result in an increase in residents. The project would, however, result in an increase in employment. According to the Regional Housing Needs Assessment, the City of Paso Robles has about 14 percent more housing units than jobs, indicative of a “jobs-poor” community. The City’s jobs to housing ratio is estimated to increase from a year 2015 ratio of 0.87 jobs/housing to a ratio of 0.89 jobs/housing by year 2035. The City of Paso Robles is projected to reduce the imbalance between jobs and housing units. The proposed project would result in increased employment and would not result in an increase in housing. As a result, the proposed project would be anticipated to improve the jobs-housing imbalance. In addition, based on the traffic analysis prepared for this project, the project is forecast to have a work VMT per employee that is below the threshold of 85% of the regional average work VMT per employee (i.e., 11.56 work VMT/employee) (CCTC 2022). Accordingly, the increase would not be considered to conflict with regional VMT-reduction efforts and associated reductions in mobile-source emissions accounted for in the SLOAPCD’s Clean Air Plan. As a result, this impact would be considered less than significant.
Particulate Matter Report – Implementation of SB 656 Requirements In July 2005, SLOAPCD adopted the Particulate Matter Report (PM Report). The PM Report identifies various measures and strategies to reduce public exposure to PM emitted from a wide variety of sources, including emissions from permitted stationary sources and fugitive sources, such as construction activities. As discussed in Impact AQ-B, uncontrolled fugitive dust generated during construction may result in localized pollutant concentrations that may result in increased nuisance concerns to nearby land uses. Therefore, constructiongenerated emissions of PM would be considered to have a potentially significant impact with regard to air quality planning efforts.
Mitigation Measures
Implement Mitigation Measures AQ-1 through AQ-2 (refer to Impact AQ-B).
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
18 Significance After Mitigation
Implementation of Mitigation Measures AQ-1 and AQ-2 would include measures to reduce constructiongenerated emissions. Additional mitigation measures have been included that would further reduce projectrelated operational emissions. Together these measures would help to reduce PM emissions and provide consistency with SLOAPCD’s airborne PM-reduction efforts as well as measures identified in the SLOAPCD’s Clean Air Plan. With mitigation, this impact would be considered less than significant.
Impact AQ-B. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
Short-term Construction Emissions
Construction-generated emissions are of temporary duration, lasting only as long as construction activities occur, but have the potential to represent a significant air quality impact. Construction of the proposed project would result in the temporary generation of emissions associated with demolition, site grading and excavation, paving, motor vehicle exhaust associated with construction equipment and worker trips, as well as the movement of construction equipment on unpaved surfaces. Short-term construction emissions would result in increased emissions of ozone-precursor pollutants (i.e., ROG and NOX) and emissions of PM. Emissions of ozone-precursors would result from the operation of on- and off-road motorized vehicles and equipment.
Emissions of airborne PM are largely dependent on the amount of ground disturbance associated with site preparation activities and can result in increased concentrations of PM that can adversely affect nearby sensitive land uses.
Estimated maximum daily and quarterly emissions associated with construction of the proposed project are presented in Table 10 and Table 11, respectively. Construction generated emissions were compared to SLOAPCD’s recommended significance thresholds (Daily, Quarterly Tier 1, and Quarterly Tier 2). As depicted in Table 10, maximum daily emissions associated with project construction would total approximately 122.3 lbs/day of ROG+NOX and 1.4 lbs/day of exhaust PM10. As depicted in Table 11, maximum quarterly construction-generated emissions would total approximately 0.89 tons/quarter of ROG+NOX, 0.1 tons/quarter of fugitive PM10, and 0.02 tons/quarter of exhaust PM10. 7DEOH'DLO\&RQVWUXFWLRQ(PLVVLRQVZLWKRXW0LWLJDWLRQ Construction Activity
Emissions (lbs/day)1
ROG NOX ROG+NOX
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total
PM10
Demolition 2.3 21.7 24.0 0.4 1.0 1.4
Site Preparation 2.7 27.6 30.3 19.8 1.3 21.1
Grading 3.4 35.6 39.0 9.5 1.4 11.0
Building Construction 2.3 17.8 20.1 2.2 0.7 2.9
Paving 1.3 10.2 11.5 0.2 0.5 0.7
Architectural Coating 3 89.3 1.4 90.7 0.4 0.1 0.4
Maximum Daily Emissions2: 92.9 35.6 122.3 19.8 1.4 21.1 SLOAPCD Significance Thresholds: -- -- 137 -- 7 --
Exceeds Thresholds? -- -- No -- No --
1. Emissions were quantified using the CalEEMod, v2020.4.0, computer program.
2. Maximum daily emissions assumes some activities (e.g., building construction, paving, architectural coating application) could potentially occur simultaneously on any given day.
3. Includes the use of low-VOC content paint (50 g/L, or less) lbs/day = pounds per day; ROG =Reactive Organic Gases; NOX = oxides of nitrogen; CO = carbon monoxide; PM10 = respirable particulate matter (10 micrometers or less) Refer to Appendix B for emissions modeling assumptions and results.
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
19 7DEOH4XDUWHUO\&RQVWUXFWLRQ(PLVVLRQV:LWKRXW0LWLJDWLRQ Quarter
Maximum Quarterly Emissions (tons)1
ROG+NOX
PM10
Fugitive Exhaust Total
Year 2023 - Quarter 1 0.33 0.1 0.02 0.1
Year 2023 - Quarter 2 0.89 0.1 0.02 0.1
Year 2023 - Quarter 3 0.65 0.1 0.02 0.1
Year 2023 – Quarter 4 0.31 0.1 0.02 0.1
Maximum Quarterly Emissions: 0.89 0.1 0.02 0.1
SLOAPCD Quarterly Tier 1/Tier 2 Thresholds (tons/quarter) 2.5/6.3 2.5/None 0.13/0.32 None Exceeds SLOAPCD Tier 1/Tier 2 Thresholds? No/No No/-- No /No -- To be conservative, total exhaust PM10 emissions were compared to SLOAPCD’s DPM threshold. Totals may not sum due to rounding. Refer to Appendix B for modeling assumptions and results. NA=Not Applicable
1. Maximum quarterly emissions include on-site and off-site emissions.
Maximum daily and quarterly construction emissions would not exceed SLOAPCD’s daily or quarterly significance thresholds. Emissions would be largely a result of mobile-source emissions associated with construction vehicle and equipment operations anticipated to occur during the grading. However, if uncontrolled, fugitive dust generated during construction may result in localized pollutant concentrations that could exceed ambient air quality standards and result in increased nuisance concerns to nearby land uses. For this reason, construction-generated emissions would be considered to have a potentially significant impact.
Mitigation Measures
AQ-1: The following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce construction generated fugitive dust. These measures shall be shown on grading and building plans. a. Reduce the amount of disturbed area where possible.
b. Use water trucks, SLOAPCD-approved dust suppressants (see Section 4.3 in the CEQA Air Quality Handbook), or sprinkler systems in sufficient quantities to prevent airborne dust from leaving the site and from exceeding the District’s limit of 20% opacity for greater than 3 minutes in any 60- minute period. Increased watering frequency would be required whenever wind speeds exceed 15 mph. Reclaimed (non-potable) water should be used whenever possible. Please note that since water use is a concern due to drought conditions, the contractor or builder shall consider the use of an APCD-approved dust suppressant where possible to reduce the amount of water used for dust control. For a list of suppressants, see Section 4.3 of the CEQA Air Quality Handbook.
c. All dirt stockpile areas should be sprayed daily or covered with tarps or other dust barriers as needed.
d. All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc. to be paved should be completed as soon as possible.
In addition, building pads should be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used.
e. All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be covered or should maintain at least two feet of freeboard (minimum vertical distance between the top of load and top of trailer) in accordance with CVC Section 23114.
f. “Track-Out” is defined as sand or soil that adheres to and/or agglomerates on the exterior surfaces of motor vehicles and/or equipment (including tires) that may then fall onto any highway or street as described in CVC Section 23113 and California Water Code 13304. To prevent ‘track out’, designate access points and require all employees, subcontractors, and others to use them. Install and operate a ‘track-out prevention device’ where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto paved streets. The ‘track-out prevention device’ can be any device or combination of devices that are effective at preventing track out, located at the point of intersection of an unpaved area and a paved road. Rumble strips or steel plate devices need periodic cleaning to be effective. If paved roadways accumulate tracked out soils, the trackout prevention device may need to be modified.
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
20 g. Permanent dust control measures identified in the approved project revegetation and landscape plans should be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities.
h. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading should be sown with a fast germinating, non-invasive grass seed and watered until vegetation is established.
i. All disturbed soil areas not subject to revegetation should be stabilized using approved chemical soil binders, jute netting, or other methods approved in advance by the SLOAPCD. j. Vehicle speed for all construction vehicles shall not exceed 15 mph on any unpaved surface at the construction site.
k. Sweep streets at the end of each day if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent paved roads.
Water sweepers with reclaimed water should be used where possible. Roads shall be pre-wetted prior to sweeping when possible.
l. The burning of vegetative material shall be prohibited. Effective February 25, 2000, the APCD prohibited developmental burning of vegetative material within San Luis Obispo County. If you have any questions regarding these requirements, contact the SLOAPCD Engineering & Compliance Division at (805) 781-5912.
m. The contractor or builder shall designate a person or persons to monitor the fugitive dust emissions and enhance the implementation of the measures as necessary to minimize dust complaints, reduce visible emissions below 20% opacity, and to prevent the transport of dust offsite. Their duties shall include holidays and weekend periods when work may not be in progress.
The name and telephone number of such persons shall be provided to the SLOAPCD Compliance Division prior to the start of any grading, earthwork or demolition.
AQ-2: The following measures shall be implemented to reduce construction emissions from on and off-road construction equipment (NOx, ROG, and DPM) and area sources. These measures shall be shown on grading and building plans:
a. Maintain all construction equipment in proper tune according to manufacturer’s specifications. b. Heavy-duty (50 horsepower or greater) diesel-fueled construction equipment shall meet, at a minimum, ARB's Tier 3 certified engines, or cleaner, off-road heavy-duty diesel engines; be fitted with diesel exhaust particulate filters in accordance with manufacturer recommendations; and, comply with the State Off-Road Regulation. Heavy-duty equipment with Tier 4 engines shall be used to the extent locally available. Where Tier 3, or cleaner, equipment is not available, incorporate diesel emission control strategies/retrofits, such that emission reductions achieved equal or exceed that of a Tier 3 engine. Installing California Verified Diesel Emission Control Strategies. Verified diesel emissions control strategies can be found at:
arb.ca.gov/diesel/verdev/vt/cvt.htm.
c. When applicable, portable equipment, 50 horsepower (hp) or greater, used during construction activities shall be registered with the California statewide portable equipment registration program (issued by the California Air Resources Board) or be permitted by the APCD. Such equipment may include power screens, conveyors, internal combustion engines, crushers, portable generators, tub grinders, trammel screens, and portable plants (e.g., aggregate plant, asphalt plant, concrete plant). For more information, contact the SLOAPCD Engineering & Compliance Division at (805) 781-5912.
d. Use on-road heavy-duty trucks that meet the ARB’s 2007 or cleaner certification standard for onroad heavy-duty diesel engines, and comply with the State On-Road Regulation. e. All on and off-road diesel equipment shall not idle when not in use. Signs shall be posted in the designated queuing areas and or job sites to remind drivers and operators of the 5-minute idling limit.
f. Construction equipment staging areas shall be located at the furthest distance possible from nearby sensitive land uses.
g. To the extent locally available, electrified or alternatively powered construction equipment shall be used.
h. Construction of the proposed project shall use low-VOC content paints (e.g., 50 grams VOC per liter, or less).
i. To the extent locally available, use prefinished building materials or materials that do not require the application of architectural coatings.
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
21 j. Meet or exceed Cal Green Tier 2 standards for reducing cement use in concrete mix as allowed by local ordinance and conditions.
Significance After Mitigation
Implementation of Mitigation Measures AQ-1 and AQ-2 include SLOAPCD-recommended standard and best available control measures to reduce construction-generated emissions of fugitive dust, mobile-source emissions associated with construction vehicles and equipment, and evaporative emissions from architectural coasting (e.g. low VOC-emission paint). Mitigated daily and quarterly emissions are summarized in Table 12 and Table 13, respectively. With mitigation, this impact would be considered less than significant. 7DEOH&RQVWUXFWLRQ(PLVVLRQVZLWK0LWLJDWLRQ
Construction Activity
Emissions (lbs/day)1
ROG NOX ROG+NOX
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total
PM10
Demolition 1.0 18.5 19.5 0.3 0.9 1.2
Site Preparation 1.0 19.1 20.1 7.9 1.0 8.9
Grading 1.6 31.1 32.7 3.9 1.3 5.2
Building Construction 1.4 17.7 19.1 2.2 0.9 3.1
Paving 0.8 11.3 12.1 0.2 0.6 0.8
Architectural Coating 4 89.2 1.5 90.6 0.4 0.1 0.5
Maximum Daily Emissions with Tier 3 Off-Road
Equipment & Fugitive Dust Control Measures2: 91.4 31.1 121.8 7.9 1.0 8.9 SLOAPCD Significance Thresholds: -- -- 137 -- 7 --
Exceeds Thresholds? -- -- No -- No --
1. Emissions were quantified using the CalEEMod, v2020.4.0, computer program.
2. Maximum daily emissions assumes some activities could potentially occur simultaneously on any given day.
3. Includes use of off-road equipment meeting Tier 3 emissions standards and fugitive dust control measures.
4. Includes the use of low-VOC content paint (50 g/L or less) lbs/day = pounds per day; ROG = Reactive Organic Gases; NOX = oxides of nitrogen; PM10 = respirable particulate matter (10 micrometers or less); DPFs = Diesel particulate filters
Refer to Appendix B for emissions modeling assumptions and results. 7DEOH4XDUWHUO\&RQVWUXFWLRQ(PLVVLRQV:LWK0LWLJDWLRQ Quarter
Maximum Quarterly Emissions (tons)2
ROG+NOX
PM10
Fugitive Exhaust Total
Year 2023 - Quarter 1 0.25 0.6 0.03 0.6
Year 2023 - Quarter 2 0.77 0.6 0.03 0.6
Year 2023 - Quarter 3 0.62 0.6 0.03 0.6
Year 2023 – Quarter 4 0.30 0.6 0.03 0.6
Maximum Quarterly Emissions: 0.77 0.6 0.03 0.6
SLOAPCD Quarterly Tier 1/Tier 2 Thresholds (tons/quarter) 2.5/6.3 2.5/None 0.13/0.32 None To be conservative, total exhaust PM10 emissions were compared to SLOAPCD’s DPM threshold. Totals may not sum due to rounding. Refer to Appendix B for modeling assumptions and results. NA=Not Applicable
1. Includes the use of off-road equipment meeting Tier 3 emission standards and fugitive dust control measures.
2. Maximum quarterly emissions include on-site and off-site emissions. lbs/day = pounds per day; ROG = Reactive Organic Gases; NOX = oxides of nitrogen; PM10 = respirable particulate matter (10 micrometers or less); DPF = Diesel Particulate Filter
Long-term Operational Emissions
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
22 Long-term operational emissions associated with the proposed project would be predominantly associated with mobile sources. To a lesser extent, emissions associated with area sources, such as landscape maintenance activities, as well as use of electricity and natural gas would also contribute to increased operational emissions.
Unmitigated operational emissions associated with the proposed project are summarized in Table 14. As depicted, daily operational emission from non-permitted sources (excluding wine production emissions) would total approximately 25.4 lbs/day of ROG+NOx, 16.1 lbs/day of CO, 3.5 lbs/day of fugitive PM10, and 0.1 lbs/day of exhaust PM10.
7DEOH2SHUDWLRQDO(PLVVLRQV:LWKRXW0LWLJDWLRQ
Operational Period/Source
Emissions1
ROG/
VOC NOX
ROG/VOC
+NOX
CO
PM10
Fugitive Exhaust Total
Daily Emissions (lbs/day)
Area Source 10.5 <0.1 10.5 0.1 0 <0.1 <0.1
Energy Use <0.1 0.4 0.4 0.3 0 <0.1 <0.1
Mobile 1.9 12.5 14.4 15.7 3.5 0.1 3.6
Wine Fermentation2 39.4 0 0 0 0 0 0
Wastewater Pond2 2.3 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total (Excluding Permitted Sources): 12.5 12.9 25.4 16.1 3.5 0.1 3.6 Total (Including Permitted Sources): 54.2 12.9 67.1 16.1 3.5 0.1 3.6 SLOAPCD Significance Thresholds -- -- 25 550 25 1.25 -- Exceeds SLOAPCD Thresholds? -- -- Yes No No No --
Annual Emissions (tons/year)
Total (Excluding Permitted Sources): 2.2 1.9 4.1 2.4 0.5 0.0 0.5 Total (Including Permitted Sources): 9.9 1.9 11.8 2.4 0.5 0.0 0.5 SLOAPCD Significance Thresholds -- -- 25 -- 25 -- --
Exceeds SLOAPCD Thresholds? -- -- No -- No -- --
1. Emissions quantified using CalEEMod, v2020.4.0. Totals may not sum due to rounding. Refer to Appendix B for modeling output files and assumptions.
2. Calculated using MBARD’s Winery Emissions Calculator based on an estimated annual production rate of 2,335,800 gallons and an estimated wastewater throughput of 3,596,000 gallons/year, based on data provided by the project applicant. It is important to note that new or expanding wineries with storage capacity of 26,000 gallons per year, or more, would be required to obtain a Permit to Operate from SLOAPCD for VOC-related emissions associated with wine production/storage and associated wastewater ponds.
Permitted Emission Sources
The Daou warehouse would also result in additional emissions of VOCs (ethanol) associated with wine production, including fermentation during the production process and evaporative emissions associated with the onsite wastewater pond. Emissions from these sources would be subject to SLOAPCD permitting requirements. Assuming an estimated annual production rate of 2,335,800 gallons, VOC emissions from wine fermentation would total approximately 39.4 lbs/day and 7.2 tons/year. Evaporative VOCs from the onsite wastewater storage pond would total approximately 2.3 lbs/day and 0.4 tons/year.
As noted in Table 14, maximum daily emissions, with and without the inclusion of onsite permitted sources, would exceed SLOAPCD’s corresponding daily significance threshold of 25 lbs/day. As a result, this impact would be considered potentially significant.
Health Effects of Project-Generated Regional Emissions
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
23 Project-generated emissions are evaluated based on the pollutants potential to affect local or regional air quality. As noted earlier in this report, regional pollutants of concern typically include ozone and particulate matter. Whereas, for development project, localized pollutants of primary concern often include carbon monoxide, toxic air contaminants, as well as, airborne particulates. The health effects of these pollutants are discussed earlier in this report and summarized in Table 1.
For localized pollutants, health impacts can be evaluated using screening criteria or through dispersion modeling. However, for regional pollutants such as ozone, the change in health effects associated with an individual project is a secondary pollutant created by NOX and ROG (also commonly referred to as VOCs).
As previously discussed earlier in this report, ozone is not a directly emitted pollutant. NOX and ROG are not criteria air pollutants but, when in the presence of sunlight, they can form ozone and also contribute to the formation of secondary PM2.5. Because ozone is not a directly emitted pollutant and is created under specific meteorological conditions over a wide transport area, ozone concentrations are typically evaluated at a regional level using complex photochemical models. These models are capable of predicting concentrations that take into account variations amounts of precursor emissions (e.g., ROG, NOX), temperature, inversions, sunlight, hourly variations, ambient conditions, and wind flow over long distances (e.g., miles). At the project level of analysis, evaluation of ozone concentrations is “not practicable and not likely [to] yield valid information” (SJVAPCD 2015).
Of the criteria pollutants identified, ozone and PM2.5 have the most critical health effects. As a result, concentrations of these pollutants are typically relied upon for determining public health effects. In comparison to modeled regional emissions, the emissions associated with most individual projects would be negligible and too small to produce a measurable change in regional ozone or PM2.5 concentrations or associated public health effects. In addition, the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD) has recently conducted regional emissions modeling analyses using a chemical transport model to evaluate changes in emissions and associated health effects associated with an individual project. The modeling was based on very conservative assumptions representative of the largest projects, which assumed up to approximately eight times the threshold of significance (up to 656 lbs/day) of NOX, ROG and PM. This level of emissions would be more representative of large community plan projects. Based on the modeling conducted by SMAQMD, even these large projects would have “low overall health effects” (SMAQMD 2020).
It is important to reiterate that the health effects of criteria air pollutants are taken into consideration when the U.S, EPA establishes the NAAQS for individual pollutants. The health effects of a particular pollutant are analyzed on a regional basis based on the areas attainment of the NAAQS. As previously discussed in this report, the AQI is one common method of evaluating public health impacts for criteria air pollutants of primary concern. Local air districts establish significance thresholds that are based on evaluation of an individual project’s contribution to reginal air quality conditions and associated health effects. Based on the above discussion and given that project-generated criteria pollutants would not exceed applicable significance thresholds, project-generated emissions of regional criteria pollutants (e.g., ROG, NOX, PM) would have a minimal effect on public health. In addition, refer to Impact AQ-C for a discussion of localized air quality impacts.
Mitigation Measures
AQ-3: The following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce the operational emissions generated by the project:
a. For the proposed Stravinski refrigerated warehouse, the use of diesel-fueled transport refrigeration units (TRUs) or auxiliary power units shall not be used. All truck TRUs to be used by the building tenant(s) shall be plug-in capable.
b. Electrical main service panel shall for both warehouses shall be designed to accommodate the potential future installation of electric charging stations for haul trucks. c. Heavy-duty trucks to be owned by the project applicants shall be model year 2014, or later. To the extent available, zero-emission vehicles should be used. d. Warehouse service equipment (e.g., yard hostlers, yard equipment, forklifts, pallet jacks) shall be zero-emission.
e. In accordance with ARB’s Airborne Toxic Control Measure to Limit Diesel-Fueled Commercial Motor Vehicle Idling, Heavy-duty diesel-fueled truck idle time shall be limited to 5-minutes/truck when not in use. Signage shall be posted at loading dock areas to advise drivers of this requirement.
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
24 f. Provide a pedestrian-friendly and interconnected streetscape with good access to/from the development for pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users to make alternative transportation more convenient, comfortable, and safe.
g. Implement programs to reduce employee vehicle miles traveled (e.g. incentives, SLO Regional Rideshare trip reduction program, vanpools, remote working, alternative schedules.) h. Provide employee lockers and showers to promote bicycle and pedestrian use. One shower and 5 lockers for every 25 new employees is recommended.
i. Exceed Cal Green standards by 25% for providing on-site bicycle parking: both short-term racks and long-term lockers, or a locked room with standard racks and access limited to bicyclists only.
j. Reduce fugitive dust from roads and parking areas with the use of paving or other materials. k. Exceed Cal Green Tier 2 standards for building energy efficiency. l. Exceed Cal Green Tier 2 standards for utilizing recycled content materials. m. Exceed Cal Green Tier 2 standards for the use of greywater, rainwater, or recycled water where applicable/available.
n. Exceed Cal Green Tier 2 standards for using shading, trees, plants, cool roofs, etc. to reduce "heat island" effect.
o. Exceed Cal Green building standards at the time of development for water conservation (e.g. use of low flow water fixtures, water efficient irrigation systems, and draught tolerant landscaping.)
p. All built-in appliances shall be Energy Star certified or equivalent. q. Design roof trusses to handle dead weight loads of standard solar-heated water and photovoltaic panels.
r. To the extent available, use paints and cleaning products that are low-VOC content (e.g., 50 grams/liter VOC content, or less).
s. Utilize on-site renewable energy system (e.g. solar, wind, geothermal, biomass and/or bio-gas) to offset at least 10% of the project’s electricity use.
AQ-4: Prior to Project construction, the SLOAPCD shall be consulted to identify applicable permitting limitations and requirements for wine production and the proposed wastewater pond. A Permit to Operate (PTO) shall be obtained from the SLOAPCD prior to installation of permitted equipment or processes.
Significance After Mitigation
Implementation of Mitigation Measures AQ-3 includes SLOAPCD-recommended measures to reduce operational-generated emissions. Additional mitigation measures recommended by the ARB for the control of emissions associated with warehouse operations have also been included. Mitigated operational emissions are summarized in Table 15. With mitigation, operational emissions of ROG+NOX would not exceed SLOAPCD significance thresholds. Mitigation Measure AQ-4 would also require that a PTO be obtained from SLOAPCD for proposed permitted sources, including wine production. Permitted sources exceed the SLOAPCD’s permitting limitation would be subject to Best Available Control Technology requirements.
Depending on the amount of emissions generated, wine production facilities may also be subject to offset requirements. Compliance with SLOAPCD permit requirements would ensure that emissions from permitted sources would not exceed applicable thresholds. With mitigation, this impact would be considered less than significant.
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
25 7DEOH2SHUDWLRQDO(PLVVLRQV:LWK0LWLJDWLRQ
Operational Period/Source
Emissions1
ROG NOX ROG+NOX CO
PM10
Fugitive Exhaust Total
Daily Emissions (lbs/day)
Area Source 8.0 <0.1 8.0 0.1 0 <0.1 <0.1
Energy Use <0.1 0.4 0.4 0.3 0 <0.1 <0.1
Mobile 1.9 12.5 14.4 15.7 3.5 0.1 3.6
Total (Excluding Permitted Sources): 12.5 12.9 22.8 16.1 3.5 0.1 3.6 SLOAPCD Significance Thresholds -- -- 25 550 25 1.25 -- Exceeds SLOAPCD Thresholds? -- -- No No No No --
Annual Emissions (tons/year)
Total (Excluding Permitted Sources): 2.2 1.9 4.1 2.4 0.5 0.0 0.5 SLOAPCD Significance Thresholds -- -- 25 -- 25 -- --
Exceeds SLOAPCD Thresholds? -- -- No -- No -- --
1. Emissions quantified using CalEEMod, v2020.4.0. Totals may not sum due to rounding. Includes use of low-VOC content paints, use of lowflow water fixtures, installation of drought-tolerant landscaping and water-efficient irrigation systems. Additional mitigation measures, such as promoting the use of alternative means of transportation for workers, would result in additional reductions. Does not include emissions from permitted sources (e.g., wine production). Refer to Appendix B for modeling output files and assumptions.
Impact AQ-C. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? The proposed project would result in localized increases of pollutant concentrations during project construction and long-term operation. The proposed project’s potential contribution to localized air pollutants is discussed, as follows:
Short-Term Construction Activities
Naturally-Occurring Asbestos
Naturally-occurring asbestos (NOA) has been identified as a toxic air contaminant by the ARB. In accordance with ARB Air Toxics Control Measure (ATCM), prior to any grading activities, a geologic evaluation should be conducted to determine if NOA is present within the area that will be disturbed. If NOA is not present, an exemption request form, along with a copy of the geologic report, must be filed with the SLOAPCD. If NOA is found at the site, the applicant must comply with all requirements outlined in the Asbestos ATCM.
Based on a review of the SLOAPCD’s map depicting potential areas of NOA, the project site is not located in or near an area that has been identified as having a potential for NOA. As a result, this impact would be considered less than significant.
Asbestos-Containing Materials
Demolition activities can have potential negative air quality impacts, including issues surrounding the proper handling, demolition, and disposal of asbestos-containing material (ACM). ACM could be encountered during the demolition of existing buildings, particularly older structures constructed prior to 1970. Asbestos can also be found in various building products, including (but not limited to) utility pipes/pipelines (transit pipes or insulation on pipes). If a project will involve the disturbance or potential disturbance of ACM, various regulatory requirements may apply, including the requirements stipulated in the National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (40CFR61, Subpart M-Asbestos NESHAP). These requirements include but are not limited to: 1) notification, within at least 10 business days of activities commencing, to the APCD, 2) an asbestos survey conducted by a Certified Asbestos Consultant, and, 3) applicable removal and disposal requirements of identified ACM.
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
26 The proposed project would include the demolition of approximately 5,093 sf of existing on-site structures.
The demolition of existing structures may result in disturbance of ACM. This impact is considered potentially significant.
Lead-Coated Materials
Demolition of structures coated with lead-based paint can have potential negative air quality impacts and may adversely affect the health of nearby individuals. Improper demolition can result in the release of leadcontaining particles from the site. Sandblasting or removal of paint by heating with a heat gun can result in significant emissions of lead. In such instances, proper abatement of lead before demolition of these structures must be performed in order to prevent the release of lead from the site. Depending on the removal method, a SLOAPCD permit may be required. The demolition of existing structures may result in the disturbance of lead-containing materials. This impact is considered potentially significant.
Localized Construction PM Concentrations
Fugitive dust emissions would be primarily associated with building demolition, site preparation, grading, and vehicle travel on unpaved and paved surfaces. On-site off-road equipment and trucks would also result in short-term emissions of diesel-exhaust PM, which could contribute to elevated localized concentration at nearby receptors. Uncontrolled emissions of fugitive dust may also contribute to potential increases in nuisance impacts to nearby receptors. Short-term exposure to airborne particulates can result in irritation of eyes and the respiratory system and may affect sensitive individuals, including those suffering from asthma and other medical conditions. For these reasons, localized uncontrolled concentrations of constructiongenerated PM would be considered to have a potentially significant impact.
Long-term Operations
Localized CO Concentrations
Localized concentrations of CO are of primary concern in areas located near congested roadway intersections. Of particular concern are signalized intersections that are projected to operate at unacceptable levels of service (LOS) E or F (Caltrans 1996). With implementation of the recommended traffic mitigation measures, signalized intersections primarily affected by the proposed project would operate as low as LOS D, or better (CCTC 2022). As a result, implementation of the proposed project would not be anticipated to result in or contribute to localized CO concentrations that would exceed applicable ambient air quality standards. This impact is considered less than significant.
Localized Operational DPM Concentrations
Toxic air contaminants associated with long-term operation of the proposed project would consist primarily of DPM associated with the operation of diesel trucks at the proposed warehouses. Primary sources of truck related DPM emissions include the operation of truck refrigeration units (TRUs). To a somewhat lesser extent, onsite diesel idling and truck travel also contribute to overall onsite DPM emissions. Although TRUs have relatively small diesel-powered engines, their emissions can pose a significant health risk to nearby individuals.
Other sources of on-site DPM include truck travel to and from the warehouse.
In 2005, ARB release an Air Quality and Land Use Handbook that recommended not siting sensitive land uses within 1,000 feet of distribution centers/warehouses. This recommendation was based on year 2000 truck emission rates and included the on-site operation of TRUs. By year 2020, taking into account projected reductions in truck emission rates, this recommended distance was reduced to approximately 225 feet (ARB 2005). Since the release of this document, the ARB has adopted two airborne toxic control measures to reduce DPM emissions associated with truck operations at distribution centers/warehouses. The first measure prohibits idling of a vehicle more than five minutes at any one location. The second measure requires that TRUs operating in California become cleaner over time. The elimination of unnecessary idling and implementation of TRU emission standards significantly reduces localized impacts caused by DPM, as well as other toxic air contaminants contained in diesel vehicle exhaust. It is also important to note that implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-3 and AQ-4 includes measures that would significantly reduce DPM emissions associated with project operations, including restriction on idling, and electrification of the loading dock to power TRUs.
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
27 No sensitive land uses have been identified within 225 feet of the project site. As a result, potential exposure to DPM and associated health risks would be considered less than significant.
Mitigation Measures
In addition to Mitigation Measures AQ-1 through AQ-4, the following measures shall be implemented:
AQ-5: The following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce the disturbance of asbestos and lead. Strategies include but are not limited to the following:
a. Demolition of on-site structures shall comply with the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Emissions requirements (NESHAP, 40 CFR, Part 61, Subpart M) for the demolition of existing structures.
The SLOAPCD is delegated authority by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to implement the Federal Asbestos NESHAP. Prior to demolition of on-site structures, the SLOAPCD shall be notified, per NESHAP requirements. Additional information may be obtained at website URL:
http://slocleanair.org/ business/asbestos.php.
b. If during the demolition of existing structures, paint is separated from the construction materials (e.g. chemically or physically), the paint waste will be evaluated independently from the building material by a qualified hazardous materials inspector to determine its proper management. All hazardous materials shall be handled and disposed of in accordance with local, state and federal regulations.
According to the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), if the paint is not removed from the building material during demolition (and is not chipping or peeling), the material can be disposed of as construction debris (a non-hazardous waste). The landfill operator will be contacted prior to disposal of building material debris to determine any specific requirements the landfill may have regarding the disposal of lead-based paint materials. The disposal of demolition debris shall comply with any such requirements. Contact the SLOAPCD Enforcement Division at (805) 781-5912 for more information. Approval of a lead work plan and permit may be required. Lead work plans, if required, will need to be submitted to SLOAPCD ten days prior to the start of demolition. c. Prior to any grading activities, a geologic evaluation shall be conducted to determine if naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) is present within the area that will be disturbed. If NOA is not present, an exemption request must be filed with the SLOAPCD. If NOA is found at the site, the applicant must comply with all requirements outlined in the Asbestos ATCM. These requirements may include but are not limited to:
1) Development of an Asbestos Dust Mitigation Plan which must be approved by the SLOAPCD before operations begin, and,
2) Development and approval of an Asbestos Health and Safety Program (required for some projects).
Significance After Mitigation
With the implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-1 through AQ-2 construction-related emissions, including fugitive dust, would be substantially reduced. In addition, Mitigation Measure AQ-4 would require compliance with SLOAPCD permitting requirements for stationary sources. In accordance with SLOAPCD permitting requirements, a permit to operate would not be issued unless associated health risks have been reduced to within acceptable levels. Compliance with SLOAPCD permitting requirements would ensure that health risks associated with on-site permitted sources would be reduced to below SLOAPCD-recommended significance thresholds. Mitigation Measure AQ-5 would ensure compliance with applicable regulatory requirements pertaining to exposure to asbestos and lead-based paints. (Refer to Appendix A for additional information regarding Asbestos NESHAP requirements.) With mitigation, short-term exposure to localized pollutants would be considered to have a less-than-significant impact.
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
28 Impact AQ-D. Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
The occurrence and severity of odor impacts depend on numerous factors, including the nature, frequency, and intensity of the source; wind speed and direction; and the sensitivity of the receptors. While offensive odors rarely cause any physical harm, they still can be very unpleasant, leading to considerable distress among the public and often generating citizen complaints to local governments and regulatory agencies.
Projects with the potential to frequently expose members of the public to objectionable odors would be deemed to have a significant impact.
Short-term construction activities may involve processes that could result in short-term and temporary generation of odors, including the application of pavement coatings and architectural coatings used during project construction. However, construction-generated emissions would be short-term, would occur intermittently throughout the workday and would dissipate rapidly with increasing distance from the source.
As a result, short-term construction activities would not expose a substantial number of people to frequent odorous emissions.
Odorous emissions associated with long-term operations would be primarily associated with on-site wine production. Wine production facilities can result in nuisance odors during various steps of the production process. Odor generation potential is primarily associated with anaerobic processes that mix with ambient air which can result in offsite nuisance odor transport. However, compliance with SLOAPCD permitting requirements and implementation of proven methods for handling wastewater discharge and grape skin waste would minimize the occurrence of anaerobic processes that mix with ambient air which can result in offsite nuisance odor transport. If uncontrolled, odors associated with onsite wine production could result in nuisance impacts to nearby sensitive land uses. As a result, this impact is considered potentially significant.
Mitigation Measures
Implement Mitigation Measure AQ-4.
Significance After Mitigation
Mitigation Measure AQ-4 would require compliance with SLOAPCD permitting requirements for stationary sources. In accordance with SLOAPCD permitting requirements, would substantially reduce odors associated with on-site wine processing processes. With mitigation, this impact would be considered less than significant.
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
29 *5((1+286(*$6(6$1'&/,0$7(&+$1*(
([LVWLQJ6HWWLQJ
To fully understand global climate change, it is important to recognize the naturally occurring “greenhouse effect” and to define the greenhouse gases (GHGs) that contribute to this phenomenon. Various gases in the earth’s atmosphere, classified as atmospheric GHGs, play a critical role in determining the earth’s surface temperature. Solar radiation enters the earth’s atmosphere from space and a portion of the radiation is absorbed by the earth’s surface. The earth emits this radiation back toward space, but the properties of the radiation change from high-frequency solar radiation to lower-frequency infrared radiation. Greenhouse gases, which are transparent to solar radiation, are effective in absorbing infrared radiation. As a result, this radiation that otherwise would have escaped back into space is now retained, resulting in a warming of the atmosphere. This phenomenon is known as the greenhouse effect. Among the prominent GHGs contributing to the greenhouse effect are carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride. Primary GHGs attributed to global climate change, are discussed, as follows:
x Carbon Dioxide. Carbon dioxide (CO2) is a colorless, odorless gas. CO2 is emitted in a number of ways, both naturally and through human activities. The largest source of CO2 emissions globally is the combustion of fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and gas in power plants, automobiles, industrial facilities, and other sources. A number of specialized industrial production processes and product uses such as mineral production, metal production, and the use of petroleum-based products can also lead to CO2 emissions. The atmospheric lifetime of CO2 is variable because it is so readily exchanged in the atmosphere (U.S. EPA 2018).
x Methane. Methane (CH4) is a colorless, odorless gas that is not flammable under most circumstances.
CH4 is the major component of natural gas, about 87 percent by volume. It is also formed and released to the atmosphere by biological processes occurring in anaerobic environments. Methane is emitted from a variety of both human-related and natural sources. Human-related sources include fossil fuel production, animal husbandry (enteric fermentation in livestock and manure management), rice cultivation, biomass burning, and waste management. These activities release significant quantities of methane to the atmosphere. Natural sources of methane include wetlands, gas hydrates, permafrost, termites, oceans, freshwater bodies, non-wetland soils, and other sources such as wildfires. Methane’s atmospheric lifetime is about 12 years (U.S. EPA 2018). x Nitrous Oxide. Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a clear, colorless gas with a slightly sweet odor. N2O is produced by both natural and human-related sources. Primary human-related sources of N2O are agricultural soil management, animal manure management, sewage treatment, mobile and stationary combustion of fossil fuels, acid production, and nitric acid production. N2O is also produced naturally from a wide variety of biological sources in soil and water, particularly microbial action in wet tropical forests. The atmospheric lifetime of N2O is approximately 114 years (U.S. EPA 2018). x Hydrofluorocarbons. Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) are man-made chemicals, many of which have been developed as alternatives to ozone-depleting substances for industrial, commercial, and consumer products. The only significant emissions of HFCs before 1990 were of the chemical HFC-23, which is generated as a byproduct of the production of HCFC-22 (or Freon 22, used in air conditioning applications). The atmospheric lifetime for HFCs varies from just over a year for HFC152a to 270 years for HFC-23. Most of the commercially used HFCs have atmospheric lifetimes of less than 15 years (e.g., HFC-134a, which is used in automobile air conditioning and refrigeration, has an atmospheric life of 14 years) (U.S. EPA 2018).
x Perfluorocarbons. Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) are colorless, highly dense, chemically inert, and nontoxic. There are seven PFC gases: perfluoromethane (CF4), perfluoroethane (C2F6), perfluoropropane (C3F8), perfluorobutane (C4F10), perfluorocyclobutane (C4F8), perfluoropentane (C5F12), and perfluorohexane (C6F14). Natural geological emissions have been responsible for the PFCs that have accumulated in the atmosphere in the past; however, the largest current source is aluminum production, which releases CF4and C2F6 as byproducts. The estimated atmospheric lifetimes for PFCs ranges from 2,600 to 50,000 years (U.S. EPA 2018).
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
30 x Nitrogen Trifluoride. Nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) is an inorganic, colorless, odorless, toxic, nonflammable gas used as an etchant in microelectronics. Nitrogen trifluoride is predominantly employed in the cleaning of the plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition chambers in the production of liquid crystal displays and silicon-based thin-film solar cells. It has a global warming potential of 16,100 carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e). While NF3may have a lower global warming potential than other chemical etchants, it is still a potent GHG. In 2009, NF3 was listed by California as a high global warming potential GHG to be listed and regulated under Assembly Bill (AB) 32 (Section 38505 Health and Safety Code).
x Sulfur Hexafluoride. Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) is an inorganic compound that is colorless, odorless, nontoxic, and generally non-flammable. SF6 is primarily used as an electrical insulator in high voltage equipment. The electric power industry uses roughly 80 percent of all SF6 produced worldwide. Leaks of SF6 occur from aging equipment and during equipment maintenance and servicing. SF6 has an atmospheric life of 3,200 years (U.S. EPA 2018).
x Black Carbon. Black carbon is the strongest light-absorbing component of particulate matter (PM) emitted from burning fuels such as coal, diesel, and biomass. Black carbon contributes to climate change both directly by absorbing sunlight and indirectly by depositing on snow and by interacting with clouds and affecting cloud formation. Black carbon is considered a short-lived species, which can vary spatially and, consequently, it is very difficult to quantify associated global-warming potentials. The main sources of black carbon in California are wildfires, off-road vehicles (locomotives, marine vessels, tractors, excavators, dozers, etc.), on-road vehicles (cars, trucks, and buses), fireplaces, agricultural waste burning, and prescribed burning (planned burns of forest or wildlands) (CCAC 2018, U.S. EPA 2018).
Each GHG differs in its ability to absorb heat in the atmosphere based on the lifetime, or persistence, of the gas molecule in the atmosphere. Often, estimates of GHG emissions are presented in CO2e, which weight each gas by its global warming potential (GWP). Expressing GHG emissions in CO2e takes the contribution of all GHG emissions to the greenhouse effect and converts them to a single unit equivalent to the effect that would occur if only CO2 were being emitted. Table 16 provides a summary of the GWP for GHG emissions of typical concern with regard to community development projects, based on a 100-year time horizon. As indicated, Methane traps over 25 times more heat per molecule than CO2, and N2O absorbs roughly 298 times more heat per molecule than CO2. Additional GHG with high GWP includes Nitrogen trifluoride, Sulfur hexafluoride, Perfluorocarbons, and black carbon.
7DEOH*OREDO:DUPLQJ3RWHQWLDOIRU*UHHQKRXVH*DVHV Greenhouse Gas Global Warming Potential (100-year)
Carbon Dioxide (CO2) 1
Methane (CH4) 25
Nitrous Dioxide (N2O) 298
Based on IPCC GWP values for 100-year time horizon.
Source: IPCC 2007
Statewide GHG Emissions
In 2019, GHG emissions within California totaled 418.1 million metric tons (MMT) of CO2e. GHG emissions, by sector, are summarized in Figure 3. Within California, the transportation sector is the largest contributor, accounting for approximately 39.7 percent of the total state-wide GHG emissions. Emissions associated with industrial uses are the second-largest contributor, totaling roughly 21.1 percent. Electricity generation totaled roughly 14.1 percent. Other major emission sources included commercial uses, residential uses, agriculture, refrigerants, and waste (ARB 2022).
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
31 )LJXUH&DOLIRUQLD*+*(PLVVLRQV,QYHQWRU\E\6HFWRU 6XEVHFWRU
Source: ARB 2022
City of Paso Robles GHG Emissions Inventories
The City has completed a community-wide inventory of GHG emissions for years 2005 and 2012, which are summarized in Table 17. As shown, a majority of the City’s emissions are associated with mobile sources.
Remaining GHG emissions are predominantly associated with energy use and solid waste generation. In comparison to year 2005 community-wide emissions, year 2016 emissions decreased by a total of approximately 12 percent (City of Paso Robles 2013).
7DEOH&LW\RI3DVR5REOHV*+*(PLVVLRQV,QYHQWRULHV Sector Year 2005
(MTCO2e)
Year 2020
(MTCO2e)
Percent Change from
2005 to 2020
Residential 40,188 46,828 17%
Commercial/Industrial 33,536 30,551 -9%
Transportation 67,801 92,913 37%
Off-Road 13,205 15,878 20%
Solid Waste 13,343 16,653 17%
Wastewater 70 82 17%
Aircraft 1,324 1,543 17%
Total 169,557 203,448 20%
Source: City of Paso Robles Climate Action Plan 2013
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
32 Short-Lived Climate Pollutants
Short-lived climate pollutants (SLCPs), such as black carbon, fluorinated gases, and methane also have a dramatic effect on climate change. Though short-lived, these pollutants create a warming influence on the climate that is many times more potent than that of carbon dioxide.
As part of the ARB’s efforts to address SLCPs, the ARB has developed a statewide emission inventory for black carbon. The black carbon inventory will help support the implementation of the SLCP Strategy, but it is not part of the State’s GHG Inventory that tracks progress towards the State’s climate targets. The most recent inventory for year 2013 conditions is depicted in Figure 4. As depicted, off-road mobile sources account for a majority of black carbon emissions totaling roughly 36 percent of the inventory. Other major anthropogenic sources of black carbon include on-road transportation, residential wood burning, fuel combustion, and industrial processes (ARB 2020).
)LJXUH&DOLIRUQLD%ODFN&DUERQ(PLVVLRQV,QYHQWRU\
<HDU
Source: ARB 2020
Effects of Global Climate Change
There are uncertainties as to exactly what the climate changes will be in various local areas of the earth.
There are also uncertainties associated with the magnitude and timing of other consequences of a warmer planet: sea-level rise, spread of certain diseases out of their usual geographic range, the effect on agricultural production, water supply, sustainability of ecosystems, increased strength and frequency of storms, extreme heat events, increased air pollution episodes, and the consequence of these effects on the economy.
Within California, climate changes would likely alter the ecological characteristics of many ecosystems throughout the state. Such alterations would likely include increases in surface temperatures and changes in the form, timing, and intensity of precipitation. For instance, historical records are depicting an increasing trend toward earlier snowmelt in the Sierra Nevada. This snowpack is a principal supply of water for the state, providing roughly 50 percent of the state’s annual runoff. If this trend continues, some areas of the state may experience an increased danger of floods during the winter months and possible exhaustion of the snowpack during spring and summer months. Earlier snowmelt would also impact the State’s energy resources.
Currently, approximately 20 percent of California's electricity comes from hydropower. Early exhaustion of the Sierra snowpack may force electricity producers to switch to more costly or non-renewable forms of electricity generation during spring and summer months. A changing climate may also impact agricultural crop yields, coastal structures, and biodiversity. As a result, changes in climate will likely have detrimental effects on some of California’s largest industries, including agriculture, wine, tourism, skiing, recreational and commercial fishing, and forestry.
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
33 5HJXODWRU\)UDPHZRUN
)HGHUDO
(;(&87,9(25'(5
Executive Order 13514 is focused on reducing GHGs internally in federal agency missions, programs, and operations. In addition, the executive order directs federal agencies to participate in the Interagency Climate Change Adaptation Task Force, which is engaged in developing a national strategy for adaptation to climate change.
On April 2, 2007, in Massachusetts v. U.S. EPA, 549 U.S. 497 (2007), the Supreme Court found that GHGs are air pollutants covered by the FCAA and that the U.S. EPA has the authority to regulate GHG. The Court held that the U.S. EPA Administrator must determine whether or not emissions of GHGs from new motor vehicles cause or contribute to air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare, or whether the science is too uncertain to make a reasoned decision.
On December 7, 2009, the U.S. EPA Administrator signed two distinct findings regarding GHGs under section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act:
x Endangerment Finding: The Administrator found that the current and projected concentrations of the six key well-mixed GHGs (CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, and SF6) in the atmosphere threaten the public health and welfare of current and future generations. x Cause or Contribute Finding: The Administrator found that the combined emissions of these wellmixed GHGs from new motor vehicles and new motor vehicle engines contribute to the GHG pollution which threatens public health and welfare.
Although these findings did not themselves impose any requirements on industry or other entities, this action was a prerequisite to finalizing the U.S. EPA’s Proposed Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards for Light-Duty Vehicles, which was published on September 15, 2009. On May 7, 2010, the final Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards was published in the Federal Register.
The U.S. EPA and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) are taking coordinated steps to enable the production of a new generation of clean vehicles with reduced GHG emissions and improved fuel efficiency from on-road vehicles and engines. These next steps include developing the first-ever GHG regulations for heavy-duty engines and vehicles, as well as additional light-duty vehicle GHG regulations.
These steps were outlined by President Obama in a Presidential Memorandum on May 21, 2010.
The final combined U.S. EPA and NHTSA standards that make up the first phase of this national program apply to passenger cars, light-duty trucks, and medium-duty passenger vehicles, covering model years 2012 through 2016. The standards require these vehicles to meet an estimated combined average emissions level of 250 grams of CO2 per mile (the equivalent to 35.5 miles per gallon if the automobile industry were to meet this CO2 level solely through fuel economy improvements). Together, these standards will cut GHG emissions by an estimated 960 MMT and 1.8 billion barrels of oil over the lifetime of the vehicles sold under the program (model years 2012-2016). On August 28, 2012, U.S. EPA and NHTSA issued their joint rule to extend this national program of coordinated GHG and fuel economy standards to model years 2017 through 2025 passenger vehicles.
6WDWH
(;(&87,9(25'(5126
Executive Order S-3-05 (State of California) proclaims that California is vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. It declares that increased temperatures could reduce the Sierra’s snowpack, further exacerbate California’s air quality problems, and potentially cause a rise in sea levels. To combat those concerns, the Executive Order established total GHG emission targets. Specifically, emissions are to be reduced to the 2000 level by 2010, to the 1990 level by 2020, and to 80 percent below the 1990 level by 2050.
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
34 The Executive Order directed the secretary of the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) to coordinate a multi-agency effort to reduce GHG emissions to the target levels. The secretary will also submit biannual reports to the governor and state legislature describing (1) progress made toward reaching the emission targets, (2) impacts of global warming on California’s resources, and (3) mitigation and adaptation plans to combat these impacts. To comply with the Executive Order, the secretary of CalEPA created a Climate Action Team made up of members from various state agencies and commissions. The Climate Action Team released its first report in March 2006 and continues to release periodic reports on progress. The report proposed to achieve the targets by building on voluntary actions of California businesses, local government, and community actions, as well as through state incentive and regulatory programs. $66(0%/<%,//&$/,)251,$*/2%$/:$50,1*62/87,216$&72) AB 32 (Health and Safety Code Sections 38500, 38501, 28510, 38530, 38550, 38560, 38561–38565, 38570, 38571, 38574, 38580, 38590, 38592–38599) requires that statewide GHG emissions be reduced to 1990 levels by the year 2020. The gases that are regulated by AB 32 include CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, NF3, and SF6. The reduction to 1990 levels will be accomplished through an enforceable statewide cap on GHG emissions that will be phased in starting in 2012. To effectively implement the cap, AB 32 directs ARB to develop and implement regulations to reduce statewide GHG emissions from stationary sources. AB 32 specifies that regulations adopted in response to AB 1493 should be used to address GHG emissions from vehicles.
However, AB 32 also includes language stating that if the AB 1493 regulations cannot be implemented, then ARB should develop new regulations to control vehicle GHG emissions under the authorization of AB 32.
AB 32 requires that ARB adopt a quantified cap on GHG emissions representing 1990 emissions levels and disclose how it arrives at the cap, institute a schedule to meet the emissions cap, and develop tracking, reporting, and enforcement mechanisms to ensure that the state achieves reductions in GHG emissions necessary to meet the cap. AB 32 also includes guidance to institute emissions reductions in an economically efficient manner and conditions to ensure that businesses and consumers are not unfairly affected by the reductions.
&/,0$7(&+$1*(6&23,1*3/$1
In October 2008, ARB published its Climate Change Proposed Scoping Plan, which is the State’s plan to achieve GHG reductions in California required by AB 32. This initial Scoping Plan contained the main strategies to be implemented in order to achieve the target emission levels identified in AB 32. The Scoping Plan included ARB-recommended GHG reductions for each emissions sector of the state’s GHG inventory.
The largest proposed GHG reduction recommendations were associated with improving emissions standards for light-duty vehicles, implementing the Low Carbon Fuel Standard program, implementation of energy efficiency measures in buildings and appliances, and the widespread development of combined heat and power systems, and developing a renewable portfolio standard for electricity production.
The Scoping Plan states that land use planning and urban growth decisions will play important roles in the state’s GHG reductions because local governments have primary authority to plan, zone, approve, and permit how land is developed to accommodate population growth and the changing needs of their jurisdictions. ARB further acknowledges that decisions on how land is used will have large impacts on the GHG emissions that will result from the transportation, housing, industry, forestry, water, agriculture, electricity, and natural gas emissions sectors. With regard to land use planning, the Scoping Plan expects approximately
5.0 MMT CO2e will be achieved associated with the implementation of Senate Bill 375, which is discussed further below.
The initial Scoping Plan was first approved by ARB on December 11, 2008, and is updated every five years.
The first update of the Scoping Plan was approved by the ARB on May 22, 2014, which looked past 2020 to set mid-term goals (2030-2035) on the road to reaching the 2050 goals., The most recent update released by ARB is the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan, which was released on November 2017. The 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan incorporates strategies for achieving the 2030 GHG-reduction target established in SB 32 and EO B-30-15. Most notably, the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan encourages zero net increases in GHG emissions. However, the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan recognizes that achieving net zero increases in GHG emissions may not be possible or appropriate for all projects and that the inability of a project to mitigate its GHG emissions to zero would not imply the project results in a substantial contribution to the cumulatively significant environmental impact of climate change under CEQA.
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
35 The 2022 Climate Change Scoping Plan update is currently being prepared. The 2022 Scoping Plan Update will assess progress towards achieving the SB 32 year 2030 target and will lay out a path to achieve carbon neutrality by mid-century.
6(1$7(%,//$1'*29(5125¶625'(56
Senate Bill 1078 (Public Utilities Code Sections 387, 390.1, 399.25 and Article 16) addresses electricity supply and requires that retail sellers of electricity, including investor-owned utilities and community choice aggregators, provide a minimum 20 percent of their supply from renewable sources by 2017. This Senate Bill will affect statewide GHG emissions associated with electricity generation. In 2008, Governor Schwarzenegger signed Executive Order S-14-08, which set the Renewables Portfolio Standard target to 33 percent by 2020. It directed state government agencies and retail sellers of electricity to take all appropriate actions to implement this target. Executive Order S-14-08 was later superseded by Executive Order S-21-09 on September 15, 2009. Executive Order S-21-09 directed the ARB to adopt regulations requiring 33 percent of electricity sold in the State come from renewable energy by 2020. Statute SB X1-2 superseded this Executive Order in 2011, which obligated all California electricity providers, including investor-owned utilities and publicly owned utilities, to obtain at least 33 percent of their energy from renewable electrical generation facilities by 2020.
ARB is required by current law, AB 32 of 2006, to regulate sources of GHGs to meet a state goal of reducing GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 and an 80 percent reduction of 1990 levels by 2050. The California Energy Commission and California Public Utilities Commission serve in advisory roles to help ARB develop the regulations to administer the 33 percent by 2020 requirement. ARB is also authorized to increase the target and accelerate and expand the time frame.
0$1'$725<5(3257,1*2)*+*(0,66,216
The California Global Warming Solutions Act (AB 32, 2006) requires the reporting of GHGs by major sources to the ARB. Major sources required to report GHG emissions include industrial facilities, suppliers of transportation fuels, natural gas, natural gas liquids, liquefied petroleum gas, and carbon dioxide, operators of petroleum and natural gas systems, and electricity retail providers and marketers. &$3$1'75$'(5(*8/$7,21
The cap-and-trade regulation is a key element in California’s climate plan. It sets a statewide limit on sources responsible for 85 percent of California’s GHG emissions and establishes a price signal needed to drive longterm investment in cleaner fuels and more efficient use of energy. The cap-and-trade rules came into effect on January 1, 2013, and apply to large electric power plants and large industrial plants. In 2015, fuel distributors, including distributors of heating and transportation fuels, also became subject to the cap-andtrade rules. At that stage, the program will encompass around 360 businesses throughout California and nearly 85 percent of the state’s total GHG emissions.
Under the cap-and-trade regulation, companies must hold enough emission allowances to cover their emissions and are free to buy and sell allowances on the open market. California held its first auction of GHG allowances on November 14, 2012. California’s GHG cap-and-trade system is projected to reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2020 and would achieve an approximate 80 percent reduction from 1990 levels by 2050.
6(1$7(%,//
SB 32 was signed by Governor Brown on September 8, 2016. SB 32 effectively extends California’s GHG emission-reduction goals from year 2020 to year 2030. This new emission-reduction target of 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 is intended to promote further GHG-reductions in support of the State’s ultimate goal of reducing GHG emissions by 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. SB 32 also directs the ARB to update the Climate Change Scoping Plan to address this interim 2030 emission-reduction target.
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
36 6(1$7(%,//
Senate Bill 97 (SB 97) was enacted in 2007. SB 97 required OPR to develop, and the Natural Resources Agency to adopt, amendments to the CEQA Guidelines addressing the analysis and mitigation of GHG emissions.
Those CEQA Guidelines amendments clarified several points, including the following:
x Lead agencies must analyze the GHG emissions of proposed projects and must reach a conclusion regarding the significance of those emissions.
x When a project’s GHG emissions may be significant, lead agencies must consider a range of potential mitigation measures to reduce those emissions. x Lead agencies must analyze potentially significant impacts associated with placing projects in hazardous locations, including locations potentially affected by climate change. x Lead agencies may significantly streamline the analysis of GHGs on a project level by using a programmatic GHG emissions reduction plan meeting certain criteria. x CEQA mandates analysis of a proposed project’s potential energy use (including transportationrelated energy), sources of energy supply and ways to reduce energy demand, including through the use of efficient transportation alternatives.
As part of the administrative rulemaking process, the California Natural Resources Agency developed a Final Statement of Reasons explaining the legal and factual bases, intent, and purpose of the CEQA Guidelines amendments. The amendments to the CEQA Guidelines implementing SB 97 became effective on March 18, 2010.
6(1$7(%,//
Senate Bill 100 (SB 100) was signed by Governor Jerry Brown on September 10, 2018. SB 100 sets a goal of phasing out all fossil fuels from the state’s electricity sector by 2045. SB 100 increases to 60 percent, from 50 percent, how much of California’s electricity portfolio must come from renewables by 2030. It establishes a further goal to have an electric grid that is entirely powered by clean energy by 2045, which could include other carbon-free sources, like nuclear power, that are not renewable. 6(1$7(%,//
SB 375 requires Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) to adopt a sustainable communities strategy (SCS) or alternative planning strategy (APS) that will address land-use allocation in that MPOs regional transportation plan. ARB, in consultation with MPOs, establishes regional reduction targets for GHGs emitted by passenger cars and light trucks for the years 2020 and 2035. These reduction targets will be updated every eight years but can be updated every four years if advancements in emissions technologies affect the reduction strategies to achieve the targets. ARB is also charged with reviewing each MPO’s SCS or APS for consistency with its assigned targets. If MPOs do not meet the GHG reduction targets, funding for transportation projects may be withheld. In 2018, ARB adopted updated SB 375 targets. &$/,)251,$%8,/',1*&2'(
The California Building Code (CBC) contains standards that regulate the method of use, properties, performance, or types of materials used in the construction, alteration, improvement, repair, or rehabilitation of a building or other improvement to real property. The California Building Code is adopted every three years by the Building Standards Commission (BSC). In the interim, the BSC also adopts annual updates to make necessary mid-term corrections. The CBC standards apply statewide; however, a local jurisdiction may amend a CBC standard if it makes a finding that the amendment is reasonably necessary due to local climatic, geological, or topographical conditions.
&$/,)251,$*5((1%8,/',1*67$1'$5'6
In essence, green buildings standards are indistinguishable from any other building standards, are contained in the CBC, and regulate the construction of new buildings and improvements. Whereas the focus of traditional building standards has been protecting public health and safety, the focus of green building standards is to improve environmental performance.
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
37 The 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards (2019 Standards), adopted in May 2018, addressed four key areas: smart residential photovoltaic systems, updated thermal envelope standards (preventing heat transfer from the interior to the exterior and vice versa), residential and nonresidential ventilation requirements, and non-residential lighting requirements. The 2019 Standards required new residential and non-residential construction; as well as major alterations to existing structures, to include electric vehicle (EV)-capable parking spaces which have electrical panel capacity and conduit to accommodate future installation. In addition, the 2019 Standards also required the installation of solar photovoltaic (PV) systems for low-rise residential dwellings, defined as single-family dwellings and multi-family dwellings up to three-stories in height.
These requirements are based on various factors, including the floor area of the home, sun exposure, and climate zone. Under the 2019 standards, nonresidential buildings will use about 30 percent less energy due mainly to lighting upgrades (CEC 2018).
The recently updated 2022 Building Energy Efficiency Standards (2022 Standards), which were approved in December 2021, encourages efficient electric heat pumps, establishes electric-ready requirements when natural gas is installed and to support the future installation of battery storage, and further expands solar photovoltaic and battery storage standards. The 2022 Standards extend solar PV system requirements, as well as battery storage capabilities for select land uses, including high-rise multi-family and non-residential land uses, such as office buildings, schools, restaurants, warehouses, theaters, grocery stores, and more.
Depending on the land use and other factors, solar systems should be sized to meet targets of up to 60 percent of the structure’s loads. These new solar requirements will become effective January 1, 2023, and contribute to California’s goal of reaching net-zero carbon footprint by 2045 (CEC 2022). 6+257/,9('&/,0$7(32//87$175('8&7,21675$7(*<
In March 2017, the ARB adopted the Short-Lived Climate Pollutant Reduction Strategy (SLCP Strategy) establishing a path to decrease GHG emissions and displace fossil-based natural gas use. Strategies include avoiding landfill methane emissions by reducing the disposal of organics through edible food recovery, composting, in-vessel digestion, and other processes; and recovering methane from wastewater treatment facilities, and manure methane at dairies, and using the methane as a renewable source of natural gas to fuel vehicles or generate electricity. The SLCP Strategy also identifies steps to reduce natural gas leaks from oil and gas wells, pipelines, valves, and pumps to improve safety, avoid energy losses, and reduce methane emissions associated with natural gas use. Lastly, the SLCP Strategy also identifies measures that can reduce hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) emissions at national and international levels, in addition to State-level action that includes an incentive program to encourage the use of low-GWP refrigerants, and limitations on the use of high-GWP refrigerants in new refrigeration and air-conditioning equipment (ARB 2017). 6$1/8,62%,632&2817<$,532//87,21&21752/',675,&7
The SLOAPCD is a local public agency with the primary mission of realizing and preserving clean air for all county residents and businesses. Responsibilities of the SLOAPCD include, but are not limited to, preparing plans for the attainment of ambient air quality standards, adopting and enforcing rules and regulations concerning sources of air pollution, issuing permits for stationary sources of air pollution, inspecting stationary sources of air pollution and responding to citizen complaints, monitoring ambient air quality and meteorological conditions, and implementing programs and regulations required by federal and state regulatory requirements.
&,7<2)3$6252%/(6&/,0$7($&7,213/$1
The City of Paso Robles Climate Action Plan (CAP) is a long-range plan to reduce GHG emissions from City government operations and community activities. The CAP will also help achieve multiple community goals such as lowering energy costs, reducing air pollution, supporting local economic development. The CAP includes measures to reduce community-wide GHG emissions by 15 percent below 2005 levels by 2020 (City of Paso Robles 2013).
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
38 &2817<2)6$1/8,62%,632
5(*,21$/75$163257$7,213/$16867$,1$%/(
&20081,7,(6675$7(*<
The 2019 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) was adopted by the SLOCOG Board in June 2019. The RTP includes the region's Sustainable Communities' Strategy (SCS), which outlines how the region will exceed its GHG reduction targets as required by SB 375 through the promotion of a variety of transportation demand management & system management tools and techniques to maximize the efficiency of the transportation network. Consistency with the requirement of SB 375 ensures consistency with the GHG-reduction targets set by ARB. The 2019 SCS was found to be consistent with the requirement of SB 375 and is also consistent with the general plans of the region’s jurisdictions (SLOCOG 2019). ,PSDFW$QDO\VLV
7KUHVKROGVRI6LJQLILFDQFH
In accordance with Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines, increased GHG emissions associated with the implementation of the proposed project would be considered significant if it would:
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment.
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases.
The SLOAPCD has adopted recommended GHG significance thresholds. These thresholds are based on AB 32 GHG emission reduction goals, which take into consideration the emission reduction strategies outlined in ARB’s Scoping Plan. Accordingly, if a project complies with a Qualified Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategy that is CAP is based on AB 32 GHG reductions for year 2020 operational conditions and has not yet been specifically applicable to the project, such as the City of Paso Robles Climate Action Plan, then the project would be considered to have a less-than-significant impact. The City of Paso Robles CAP includes a “Consistency Worksheet”, which identifies various measures designed to reduce project-related GHG emissions. The CAP Consistency Worksheet can be used to demonstrate project-level compliance with the CAP. However, it is important to note that the City’s CAP has not been updated to reflect SB 32 GHG reductions for target year 2030 conditions. As a result, this analysis provides an analysis of consistency with the currently adopted City CAP; however, consistency with year 2030 GHG reductions, per SB 32, and the State’s Scoping Plan have been evaluated using an efficiency threshold, taking into account the City’s 2030 GHG-reduction target mandated by SB 32 and the City’s baseline GHG inventory, as identified in the City’s existing CAP. The GHG-efficiency threshold was calculated by dividing the GHG emissions inventory goal (allowable emissions), by the City’s estimated service population (SP) for year 2030 conditions. The service population includes estimated population and employment for the City.
Emissions sectors that do not apply to the proposed project (i.e., agriculture) were excluded from the calculation. The GHG emissions inventory for the land use sectors applicable to the proposed project were then divided by the projected SP for future year 2030. The methodology used for quantification of the target efficiency threshold applied to the proposed project is summarized in Table 18. Accordingly, projectgenerated GHG emissions that would exceed the efficiency threshold of 1.9 MTCO2e/SP/year in 2030 would be considered to have a potentially significant impact on the environment that could conflict with GHGreduction planning efforts. To be conservative, amortized construction-generated GHG emissions were included in annual operational GHG emissions estimates for comparison to this threshold, consistent with SLOAPCD-recommended methodologies.
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
39 7DEOH3URMHFW/HYHO*+*(IILFLHQF\7KUHVKROG&DOFXODWLRQ Operational Year 2030
Land Use Sectors GHG Emissions Target1 100,940
Population2 37,700
Employment3 16,017
Service Population (SP) 53,717
GHG Efficiency Threshold (MTCO2e/SP/yr) 1.9
Note: Employment data for interim years are estimated based on proportionality with population trends based on historical data.
1. Based on Business-as-Usual (year 2005) emissions inventory and the State’s target reductions of 40 percent below BAU baseline GHG emissions inventory by 2030. Emissions inventory reflects locally-appropriate emissions sectors.
2.. Based on population data derived from the City of Paso Robles Demographic website. Website url:
https://www.prcity.com/244/Demographics.
3. Based on employment data derived from the California Employment Development Department. Labor Force and Unemployment Rates for Cities and Census Designated Places. Website url: https://www.labormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov/data/labor-force-and-unemployment-for-citiesand-census-areas.html. 0HWKRGRORJ\
Emissions associated with the construction of the proposed project were calculated using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod), version 2020.4.0 computer program. To be conservative, construction of the proposed warehouses were assumed to occur simultaneously. Construction phase durations were based on model defaults, with the exception of the building construction phase. Based on project-specific information received, building construction would occur over an estimated six-month period. Approximately 5,093 square feet (sf) of existing structure would be demolished. A combined total of approximately 1,510 cubic yards (cy) of fill material would be imported. Additional construction information such as off-road equipment use, worker vehicle trips, and equipment load factors were based on default parameters contained in the model. Modeling assumptions and output files are included in Appendix B of this report.
Long-term operational emissions were calculated using the CalEEMod, version 2020.4.0 based, in part, on vehicle trip-generation rates, vehicle distribution percentages, and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) derived from the traffic analysis prepared for this project (CCTC 2022). Warehouse vehicle trip distances were based on calculated travel distances of 3.7 miles for worker trips and 13 miles for truck trips for a combined average vehicle trip length of 7 miles. Based on vehicle percentages obtained from the traffic analysis, approximately 35 percent of total vehicle trips were assumed to be trucks and the remaining 65 percent were assumed to be light-duty vehicles associated with worker trips. Truck trips were assumed to consist of a mix of mediumheavy-duty trucks (MHDT) and heavy-heavy-duty trucks (HHDT). Worker trips were assumed to be light-duty vehicles defined as a mix of light-duty automobiles (LDA), light-duty trucks (LDT1 and LDT2) and medium-duty trucks (MDT) per ARB’s definition. The default fleet mix identified in CalEEMod was adjusted to reflect this increase in truck trips. All other vehicle categories were based on model defaults. Water and energy usage rates were based on model defaults. Based on information provided by the project applicants, off-road equipment used within both warehouses, such as forklifts, would be electrically powered.
GHG emissions associated with onsite wine fermentation were calculated based on methodologies derived from the Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District (SBCAPCD). Emissions were calculated based on an estimated annual wine production rate of 2,335,800 gallons/year provided by the project applicant. It is important to note that new or expanding wineries with storage capacity of 26,000 gallons per year, or more, are typically required to obtain a Permit to Operate from SLOAPCD. Permitted sources of GHGs are evaluated in comparison to the SLOAPCD’s GHG significance threshold for permitted sources of 10,000 MTCO2e/year. Emission modeling assumptions and results are included in Appendix B.
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
40 3URMHFW,PSDFWVDQG0LWLJDWLRQ0HDVXUHV
Impact GHG-A. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?
Estimated GHG emissions attributable to future development would be primarily associated with increases of CO2 from mobile sources. To a lesser extent, other GHG pollutants, such as CH4 and N2O, would also be generated. Short-term and long-term GHG emissions associated with the development of the proposed project are discussed in greater detail, as follows:
Short-term Construction GHG Emissions
Estimated increases in GHG emissions associated with the construction of the proposed project are summarized in Table 19. Based on the modeling conducted, construction-related GHG emissions would total approximately 460.4 MTCO2e. Amortized GHG emissions, when averaged over the assumed 25-year minimum life of the project, would total approximately 18.4 MTCO2e/year. There would also be a small amount of GHG emissions from waste generated during construction; however, this amount is speculative.
Actual emissions may vary, depending on the final construction schedules, equipment required, and activities conducted. Amortized construction-generated GHG emissions are included in the operational GHG emissions impact discussion provided below.
7DEOH
&RQVWUXFWLRQ*HQHUDWHG*+*(PLVVLRQV:LWKRXW0LWLJDWLRQ Construction Year GHG Emissions
(MTCO2e/Year)
2023 460.4
Amortized Construction Emissions: 18.4
Amortized emissions are quantified based on a minimum 25-year project life. Refer to Appendix B for modeling assumptions and results.
Long-term Operational GHG Emissions
Estimated long-term increases in GHG emissions associated with the proposed project for future year 2030 conditions are summarized in Table 20. For informational purposes, opening year 2024 emissions were also calculated and included in Table 20. As depicted, operational GHG emissions for the proposed project, with the inclusion of amortized construction GHGs, would total approximately 1,1,358 MTCO2e/year under operational year 2030 conditions. A majority of the operational GHG emissions would be associated with motor vehicle use and energy use. To a lesser extent, operational GHG emissions would also be associated with solid waste generation and water use. As depicted in Table 20, total emissions would equate to 2.8 MTCO2e/SP, which would exceed the significance threshold of 1.9 MTCO2e/SP. As a result, this impact is considered potentially significant.
Permitted Emission Sources
The proposed Daou warehouse would also include wine production, which can result in additional emissions of CO2 during the wine fermentation process. As previously noted, the facility would have a maximum production rate of 2,335,800 gallons/year and would be subject to SLOAPCD’s permitting requirements. The SLOAPCD’s GHG significance threshold for permitted sources of 10,000 MTCO2e/year. Assuming a maximum production rate of 2,335,800 gallons/year, the Daou warehouse would result in an estimated 934 MTCO2e/year, which would not exceed SLOAPCD’s significance threshold. Emissions from permitted sources would be considered to have a less-than-significant impact.
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
41 7DEOH2SHUDWLRQDO*+*(PLVVLRQV:LWKRXW0LWLJDWLRQ Operational Year/Source
GHG Emissions (MTCO2e/Year)
Opening
Year 2024
Future Operational
Year 2030
Energy Use1 306 306
Motor Vehicles 876 782
Waste2 89 89
Water 163 163
Amortized Construction Emissions: 18 18
Total Emissions: 1,471 1,358
Total MTCO2e/SP: 2.8
GHG Efficiency Significance Threshold: 1.9
Exceeds Threshold? Yes
1. Includes natural gas use. Assumes use of PG&E for energy supplier and default electricity intensity factors contained in CalEEMod. Includes emissions from non-permitted sources. Permitted sources are evaluated separately in comparison to SLOAPCD’s GHG significance threshold of 10,000 MTCO2e/year.
2. Includes a minimum 50% diversion rate.
3. Based on an ITE estimated total 484 employees.
Refer to Appendix B for modeling assumptions and results.
Mitigation Measures
GHG-1: In addition to implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-3 and AQ-4, the following additional measures shall be implemented:
a. Proposed land uses shall elect to receive electricity from Central Coast Community Energy (3CE).
b. Building mechanical equipment and appliances shall be electrically powered. The installation of natural-gas service/infrastructure shall be prohibited. c. The Project shall provide organic waste pick up and shall provide the appropriate on-site enclosures consistent with the provisions of the City of Paso Robles Development Standards for Solid Waste Services.
d. Meet current CALGreen Tier 2 standards for electric vehicle (EV) parking spaces, except that all EV parking spaces required by the code shall be “EV-capable” instead of “EV-ready”.
GHG-2: The project shall provide carbon offsets sufficient to reduce project-generated GHG emissions to below applicable thresholds, calculated over the life of the project. Based on the modeling conducted, the project shall provide offsets in the total amount of 5,899 MTCO2e (3,929 MTCO2e for the Stravinski warehouse and 1,970 MTCO2e for the Daou warehouse). Under CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.4, subdivisions (c)(3) and (c)(4), a project’s GHG emissions can be reduced through the application of off-site measures, which may include “Direct Reduction Activities” or the purchase of “Carbon Offset Credits”, which are discussed as follows:
Direct Reduction Activities
Directly undertake or fund activities that will reduce or sequester GHG emissions. GHG reduction credits shall achieve GHG emission reductions that are real, permanent, quantifiable, verifiable, enforceable, in accordance with the criteria set forth in the ARB’s most recent Process for the Review and Approval of Compliance Offset Protocols in Support of the Cap-and-Trade Regulation (2013). GHG reduction credits shall be undertaken for the specific purpose of reduction projectgenerated GHG emissions and shall not include reductions that would otherwise be required by law. All Direct Reduction Activities and associated reduction credits shall be confirmed by an independent, qualified third-party.
The “Direct Reduction Activity” shall be registered with a California Air Resources Board (ARB)- approved registry and in compliance with ARB-approved protocols. In accordance with the applicable Registry requirements, the Project applicant (or its designee) shall retain an Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
42 independent, qualified third-party to confirm the GHG emissions reduction or sequestration achieved by the Direct GHG Reduction Activities against the applicable Registry protocol or methodology. The Project applicant (or its designee) will then apply for issuance of carbon credits in accordance with the applicable Registry rules.
Carbon Offsets
Obtain and retire “Carbon Offsets.” Carbon Offsets shall achieve GHG reductions that are real, permanent, quantifiable, verifiable, and enforceable. Carbon offsets shall be purchased from ARBapproved registries and shall comply with ARB-approved protocols to ensure that offset credits accurately and reliably represent actual emissions reductions. If the purchase of carbon offsets is selected, offsets shall be purchased according to the City of San Luis Obispo’s preference, which is, in order of City preference: (1) within the City of San Luis Obispo; (2) within the SLOAPCD jurisdictional area; (3) within the State of California; then (4) elsewhere in the United States. In the event that a project or program providing offsets to the project applicant loses its accreditation, the project applicant shall comply with the rules and procedures of retiring offsets specific to the registry involved and shall purchase an equivalent number of credits to recoup the loss.
Significance After Mitigation
Implementation of Mitigation Measures AQ-3 would require implementation of numerous measures to reduce long-term operational emissions, including implementation of measures to reduce project-generated VMT, as well as on-site measures to reduce operational emissions. Mitigation Measures AQ-4 would require the project to obtain permits from the SLOAPCD for applicable emission sources. Mitigation Measure GHG-1 would include additional measures that would result in substantial reductions in GHG emissions associated with energy use. With implementation of these measures, project generated emissions would be reduced to approximately 2.1 MTCO2e/SP under operational year 2030 conditions, which would still exceed the significance threshold of 1.9 MTCO2e/SP. Mitigation Measure GHG-2 would require carbon offsets sufficient to reduce project-generated GHG emissions to below applicable GHG thresholds, calculated over the estimated 25-year life of the project. With mitigation, this impact would be considered less than significant.
Impact GHG-B Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
As noted in Table 20, operational GHG emissions attributable to the proposed project would be primarily associated with mobile sources. Applicable GHG-reduction plans related to reducing operational GHG emissions include the City of Paso Robles CAP, the County of San Luis Obispo’s Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy, and California’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan. The project’s consistency with these plans is discussed in greater detail, as follows:
City of Paso Robles Climate Action Plan
The City’s CAP is a long-range plan to reduce GHG emissions from City government operations and community activities within the community. The City’s CAP includes numerous measures to reduce GHG emissions associated with energy use, motor vehicle use, water use, waste generation, and construction. It is important to note, however, that the City’s CAP is based on year 2020 GHG-reduction targets and has not yet been updated to reflect year 2030 GHG-reduction targets, per SB32. Nonetheless, a summary of the proposed Project’s consistency with the measures identified in the City’s CAP are summarized in Table 21. As noted and with implementation of proposed mitigation measures, the project would be consistent with the GHG-reduction measures identified in the City’s currently adopted CAP (City of Paso Robles 2013).
County of San Luis Obispo 2019 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy The 2019 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) was adopted by the SLOCOG Board in June 2019. The RTP includes the region's Sustainable Communities' Strategy (SCS), which outlines how the region will meet or exceed its GHG reduction targets as required by SB 375 through the promotion of a variety of transportation demand management & system management tools and techniques to maximize the efficiency of the transportation network. Consistency with the requirement of SB 375 ensures consistency with the GHGAttachment 5 Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
43 reduction targets set by ARB. The 2019 SCS was found to be consistent with the requirement of SB 375 and is also consistent with the general plans of the region’s jurisdictions (SLOCOG 2019).
According to the Regional Housing Needs Assessment, the City of Paso Robles has about 15 percent more housing units than jobs, indicative of a “jobs-poor” community. The City’s housing to jobs ratio is estimated to decrease from a year 2015 ratio of 1.15 jobs/housing to a ratio of 1.112 jobs/housing by year 2035, thereby decreasing the imbalance between jobs and housing units. The proposed project would result in increased employment and would not result in an increase in housing. As a result, the proposed project would be anticipated to improve the jobs-housing imbalance. In addition, based on the VMT analysis prepared for the project, project-generated VMT would not exceed the City’s VMT significance threshold. As a result, the project would not be considered to conflict with regional VMT-reduction efforts.
California’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan
As previously noted, ARB’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan reflects the new statewide GHG emissions reductions of 40 percent below 1990 emissions levels by 2030, as mandated by SB 32. A significant part of achieving the SB 32 goals are strategies to promote sustainable communities, such as the promotion of zero net energy buildings, and improved transportation choices that result in reducing VMT. Other measures include the increased use of low-carbon fuels and cleaner vehicles.
To support the State’s GHG emissions reduction goals, including the goals mandated by SB 32, California established the Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act (SB 375). SB 375 requires regional metropolitan planning organizations, such as SBCAG, to develop SCSs which align transportation, housing, and land use decisions toward achieving the State’s GHG emissions-reduction targets. Under SB 375, the development and implementation of SCSs, which link transportation, land use, housing, and climate policy at the regional level, are designed to reduce per capita mobile-source GHG emissions, which is accomplished through implementation of measures that would result in reductions in per capita VMT.
In 2018, ARB adopted more aggressive SB 375 targets as one measure to support progress toward the 2017 Scoping Plan goals. SB 375 aims to achieve, a 19 percent reduction in statewide per capita GHG emissions from passenger vehicles by year 2035 (relative to year 2005). To achieve this reduction, ARB sets target reductions for various regions throughout the state to be included in the RTP and SCS prepared for these regions. As discussed above, the proposed project would not exceed applicable VMT thresholds. As a result, the proposed project would not conflict with regional VMT-reduction goals. However, as noted in Impact GHG-1, the proposed project would exceed the efficiency threshold of 1.9 MTCO2e/SP/year, which is based on achieving SB-32 year 2030 GHG-reduction targets, consistent with ARB’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan. For these reasons, without mitigation, the proposed project could conflict with the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan.
It is also important to note that the ARB has recently released its Draft 2022 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update (ARB 2022). Consistent with the current 2017 Scoping Plan, the Draft 2022 Scoping Plan assesses the State’s progress towards meeting its target of reducing statewide GHG emissions to 40 percent below the 1990 levels by 2030. The Draft 2022 Scoping Plan also lays out a path for achieving carbon neutrality no later than 2045, per the goal identified in Executive Order B-55-18. The draft Scoping Plan is anticipated to be approved in the fall of 2022.
For land use development projects, additional reductions in GHG emissions may be required in order to meet the project’s fair share of the statewide reductions required to achieve carbon neutrality, consistent with Executive Order B-55-18 and ARB’s Draft 2022 Scoping Plan Update. Neither the SBCAPCD nor the City of Paso Robles have developed recommended thresholds of significance that are based on achieving carbon neutrality by year 2045. However, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) has recently released recommended GHG significance thresholds that are based on a “fair share” approach for achieving carbon neutrality goals. Consistent with this approach, new land use development projects would be considered to be consistent with the State’s carbon neutrality goals and would be considered to have a less than significant impact if: 1) the project is deemed consistent with regional VMT-reduction targets; 2) the project prohibits the installation of natural gas infrastructure; and 3) the project would not result in a wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary energy use as determined by the analysis required under CEQA Section 21100(b)(3) and Section 15126.2(b) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Similarly, the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD) has also recently released Best Management Practices (BMPs), which also include the prohibited installation of natural gas infrastructure for development projects, as well Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
44 as, a requirement that project’s meet current CALGreen Tier 2 standards for electric vehicle (EV) spaces, except that EV-capable spaces shall instead be EV ready. This additional requirement requires the installation of electrical infrastructure sufficient to service the future installation of EV chargers. The BAAQMD and SMAQMD thresholds are based on an approach endorsed by the Supreme Court in Center for Biological Diversity v. Department of Fish & Wildlife (2015). Although not located within these jurisdictions, development in Santa Maria and associated GHG emissions are comparable to those generated by developments within other areas of the state, including the BAAQMD and SMAQMD jurisdictions. Given that climate change is inherently a cumulative impact that occurs on a global scale, these BMPs would, likewise, be considered representative of the project’s “fair share” of what would be required to meet the State’s long-term climate goals, including achieving carbon neutrality by 2045, as identified by the BAAQMD and the SMAQMD.
As noted above, the proposed project would be consistent with the regional VMT-reduction targets.
However, as noted in Impact GHG-1, the proposed project would exceed the efficiency threshold of 1.9 MTCO2e/SP/year, which is based on achieving SB-32 year 2030 GHG-reduction targets, consistent with ARB’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan. For these reasons, without mitigation, the proposed project could conflict with the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan. In addition, the proposed project does not include BMPs that would constitute its “fair share” of what would be required to meet the State’s long-term climate goals, including achieving carbon neutrality by 2045. Specifically, the project does not prohibit the installation of natural gas-fired appliances/equipment, nor require that current CALGreen Tier 2 compliant EV spaces to be EV ready, as opposed to EV capable. As a result, this impact would be considered potentially significant.
Mitigation Measures
Implement Mitigation Measures AQ-3, AQ-4, GHG-1 and GHG-2.
Significance After Mitigation
Implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-3 would include various measures that would help to promote the use of alternative means of transportation along with reductions in GHG emissions associated with energy use, water use, waste generation, and mobile sources. Mitigation Measures AQ-4 would require the project to obtain permits for emissions sources subject to SLOAPCD permitting requirements, which would be anticipated to result in additional reduction in onsite GHG emissions. Implementation of Mitigation Measures GHG-1 and GHG-2 would result in further reductions in on-site and off-site GHG emissions.
In addition, Mitigation Measure GHG-1 would require the project to receive electricity from Central Coast Community Energy (3CE). Central Coast Community Energy (3CE) is a locally-controlled public agency supplying clean and renewable electricity for residents and businesses in Monterey, San Benito, parts of San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, and Santa Cruz Counties. 3CE is based on a local energy model called Community Choice Energy that partners with the local utility (i.e., PG&E) which continues to provide consolidated billing, electricity transmission and distribution, customer service, and grid maintenance services. 3CE provides customers with a choice for clean and renewable energy, and community reinvestment through rate benefits and local GHG reducing energy programs for residential, commercial, and agricultural customers. 3CE is striving to provide 100 percent electricity from renewable sources by 2030.
Additional measures have also been included to require the installation of EV-ready parking spaces and to prohibit the installation of natural gas-fired appliance/equipment, in accordance with recommended BMPs for achieving fair-share reductions in GHGs in support of the State’s carbon neutrality goals. With regard to CALGreen EV parking requirements, “EV Capable” is defined as including the installation of “raceway” (the enclosed conduit that forms the physical pathway for electrical wiring to protect it from damage) and adequate future installation of a dedicated branch circuit and charging station(s). “EV Ready” includes “EV Capable” requirements plus addition of dedicated branch circuit(s) (electrical pre-wiring), circuit breakers, and other electrical components, including a receptacle (240-volt outlet) or blank cover needed to support future installation of one or more charging stations. With mitigation, the project would be considered consistent with the local, regional, and state GHG-reduction planning efforts. With mitigation, this impact would be considered less than significant.
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
45 7DEOH3URMHFW&RQVLVWHQF\ZLWKWKH&LW\¶V&OLPDWH$FWLRQ3ODQ CAP Measures Project Consistency
Energy Measures
Does the Project include an operational commitment to
reduce energy demand and increase on-site energy
supply?
Consistent with Mitigation. Mitigation measures have been included to reduce on-site energy use/demand and to
increase on-site energy supply by requiring the installation of renewable energy systems.(refer to Mitigation Measure AQ-3).
Does the Project exclusively include “All-electric
buildings”?
Consistent with Mitigation. A mitigation measure has been included to encourage the installation of electricallypowered appliances in place of natural gas to the extent possible. In addition, mitigation has also been included to require the installation of infrastructure to facilitate the future installation of alternative energy sources, such as the installation of photovoltaic systems (refer to Mitigation Measure AQ-3 and GHG-1).
If the Project/Plan includes a new mixed-fuel building or buildings (plumbed for the use of natural gas as fuel for space heating, water heating, cooking or clothes drying appliances) does that building/those buildings exceed
the City’s Energy Reach code?
Transportation and Land Use Measures
Does the Project comply with requirements in the City’s Municipal Code with no exceptions, including bicycle
parking, bikeway design, and EV charging stations?
Consistent with Mitigation. Mitigation measures have been included to require compliance with applicable building codes related to bicycle parking, bikeway design, and EV charging stations (refer to Mitigation Measures AQ-3).
Is the estimated Project-generated Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) within the City’s adopted thresholds, as confirmed by the City’s Transportation Division?
Consistent. Based on the traffic analysis prepared for this project, project-generated VMT is within the City’s
adopted thresholds.
If “No”, does the Project/Plan include VMT mitigation
strategies and/or a Transportation Demand Management
(TDM) Plan approved by the City’s Transportation Division? Does the Project demonstrate consistency with the City’s Bicycle Network Plan?
Consistent with Mitigation. Mitigation measures have been included to require the project to incorporate features to promote alternative means of transportation, including
the installation of bicycle facilities (refer to Mitigation Measures AQ-3).
Off-Road Measure
Will the Project work to reduce GHG emissions by reducing off-road equipment and vehicle usage and idling?
Consistent with Mitigation. Mitigation measures have been included to require the Project restrict idling and vehicle usage when feasible and to use alternatively-powered
equipment where possible (refer to Mitigation Measures
AQ-2 and GHG-1).
Water Measure
Does the Project comply with water efficiency and
conservation requirements?
Consistent with Mitigation. A mitigation measure has been included to require the use of low-flow water fixtures, water-efficient irrigation systems, and drought-tolerant landscaping (refer to Mitigation Measure AQ-3).
Waste Measure
Does the Project include an operational commitment to
reduce the amount of trash and other waste and recycle
as many materials as possible?
Consistent. The Project shall provide organic waste pick up and shall provide the appropriate on-site enclosures
consistent with the provisions of the City of Paso Robles Development Standards for Solid Waste Services (refer to Mitigation Measure GHG-1).
Tree Planting Measure
Does the Project include an operational commitment to
maintain a healthy urban forest and incorporate native
drought tolerant trees?
Consistent with Mitigation. Mitigation measures have been included to require the installation of trees and drought tolerant landscaping (refer to Mitigation Measure AQ-3).
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project December 2022
46 5()(5(1&(6
California Air Resources Board (ARB). Accessed January 20,2018. ARB Health-Related Fact Sheets. Website URL:
http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/health/fs/fs.htm.
California Air Resources Board (ARB). Accessed January 20, 2017. California Green Building Strategy. Website URL:
http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/greenbuildings/greenbuildings.htm.
California Air Resources Board (ARB). Accessed January 20, 2019. California Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory.
Website URL: https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/data/data.htm.
California Air Resources Board (ARB). California’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan. Website URL:
https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/scoping_plan_2017.pdf.
California Air Resources Board (ARB). Accessed December 12, 2020. Short Lived Climate Pollutants. Website URL:
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/slcp.
California Air Resources Board (ARB). Accessed December 16, 2021. Air Quality Standards and Area Designations.
Website URL: https://www.arb.ca.gov/desig/desig.htm.
California Air Resources Board (ARB). 2022. California Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory: 2000-2019. Available at website url: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/classic/cc/ca_ghg_inventory_trends_2000-2019.pdf.
California Air Resources Board (ARB). April 2005. Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective.
California Air Resources Board (ARB). August 2015. Technology Assessment: Transport Refrigerators. Available at website URL: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2020-06/TRU%20Tech%20Assessment%20Report%20ada.pdf California Air Resources Board (ARB). Accessed January 27, 2022. Airborne Toxic Control Measure to Limit Diesel-Fueled Commercial Motor Vehicle Idling. Available at website URL: https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/msprog/truckidling/13ccr2485_09022016.pdf California Energy Commission (CEC). 2019. 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards. Website url:
https://www.energy.ca.gov/programs-and-topics/programs/building-energy-efficiency-standards/2019-buildingenergy-efficiency.
California Employment Development Department. Labor Force and Unemployment Rate for Cities and Census Designated Places. Website url: https://www.labormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov/data/labor-force-and-unemploymentfor-cities-and-census-areas.html Central Coast Transportation Consulting (CCTC). September 2022. Stravinski-Daou Draft Transportation Analysis.
City of Paso Robles. 2013. City of Paso Robles Climate Action Plan. Available at Website url:
https://www.prcity.com/DocumentCenter/View/14729/Climate-Action-Plan-PDF.
City of Paso Robles. Accessed September 13, 2022. Demographics. Website URL: https://www.prcity.com/ 244/Demographics.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2007. Fourth Assessment Report, Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Available at website url: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/ 2018/03/ar4_wg2_full_report.pdf.
Monterey Bay Air Resources District (MBARD). 2018. Winery Emission Factor Guidance.
Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA). February 2015. Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments. Available at website URL:
https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf San Luis Obispo County Council of Governments (SLOCOG). 2019. Regional Housing Needs Assessment.
San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG). 2019. SLOCOG 2019 Regional Transportation Plan. Available at website url: file:///C:/Users/Kurt/Downloads/__FINAL%202019%20RTP.pdf.
San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District (SLOAPCD). December 2001. Clean Air Plan.
San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District (SLOAPCD). April 2012. CEQA Air Quality Handbook. Available at website url: https://www.slocleanair.org/rules-regulations/land-use-ceqa.php.
San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District (SLOAPCD). 2017 Clarification Memo related to the CEQA Air Quality Handbook. Available at website url: https://www.slocleanair.org/rules-regulations/land-use-ceqa.php.
San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District (SLOAPCD). 2018. APCD Naturally Occurring Asbestos Map. Available at website url: https://www.slocleanair.org/rules-regulations/land-use-ceqa.php.
Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District (SBCAPCD). Winery CO2 Calc. Website url: https://www.ourair.org/wpcontent/uploads/WineryCO2Calcs.pdf.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). Accessed: August 20, 2018. Overview of Greenhouse Gases.
Website URL: https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA).2022. AirNow. Website url: https://www.airnow.gov/.
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
APPENDIX A
SUMMARY OF NESHAP ASBESTOS REQUIREMENTS
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
For additional information, an Asbestos NESHAP Notification Form, or other Asbestos related issues, visit SLOAPCD’s website at www.slocleanair.org/rules-regulations/asbestos.php or call the SLOAPCD at 805-781-5912.
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
For additional information, an Asbestos NESHAP Notification Form, or other Asbestos related issues, visit SLOAPCD’s website at www.slocleanair.org/rules-regulations/asbestos.php or call the SLOAPCD at 805-781-5912.
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
APPENDIX B
EMISSIONS MODELING
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project
San Luis Obispo County, Summer
Project Characteristics - Land Use - Warehouses-No Rail. 194.304 KSF, 181.21 KSF. Parking area assumes max 160 parking spacesConstruction Phase - Construction based on model defaults and information provided. Tilt=up construction assumes 6 month building construction period.Off-road Equipment - Offroad equipment based on model defaults.Trips and VMT - Construction trips based on model defaultsDemolition - 5093 sf of building floor area to be demo'dGrading - Import of 815 cy for Dauo warehouse and 695 cy for Stravinski warehouse. 1510 cy total. No export.
Architectural Coating - Arch coating based on model defaults. Assumes use of low-VOC (50 g/L or less) content arch paint Vehicle Trips - Operational trip gen 1.71/KSF derived from the traffic analysis prepared for the project. Trip distances based on total avg of 7 miles/trip per traffic VMT analysis.
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 194.30 1000sqft 9.20 194,304.00 0 Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 183.87 1000sqft 9.20 183,871.00 0 Parking Lot 160.00 Space 1.44 64,000.00 0
1.2 Other Project CharacteristicsUrbanizationClimate Zone Urban4
Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days) 3.2 44
1.0 Project CharacteristicsUtility Company1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Pacific Gas and Electric Company
2024 Operational Year
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
203.98 0.033 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.004 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:15 PM Page 1 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Assumes 50%CE for unpaved roads, 61%CE for graded surfaces, 15mph onsite speed limit, T3 equipment included for informational purposesArea Mitigation - Includes the use of low-VOC content products Water Mitigation - Includes installation of low-flow water fixtures and water-efficient irrigation systemsWaste Mitigation - Assumes minimum waste reduction of 50%Fleet Mix - Adjusted to reflect estimated 35% truck (MHD & HHD). Emp trips assumes LDA, LDT1, LDT2, MDV adjusted equally to account for increased truck trips. All other veh cats based on model defaults.
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250.00 50.00tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250.00 50.00 tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintNonresidentialExteriorV alue
250 50
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintNonresidentialInteriorV alue
250 50
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 5.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 6.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 9.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:15 PM Page 2 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 120.00
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 12/5/2022 1/27/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 12/19/2022 2/10/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 1/30/2023 3/24/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 3/25/2024 9/8/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 4/22/2024 10/6/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 5/20/2024 11/3/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 11/8/2022 1/1/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 12/6/2022 1/30/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 12/20/2022 2/13/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 1/31/2023 3/27/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 3/26/2024 9/11/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 4/23/2024 10/9/2023 tblFleetMix HHD 5.9960e-003 0.18
tblFleetMix HHD 5.9960e-003 0.18tblFleetMix LDA 0.49 0.30 tblFleetMix LDA 0.49 0.30
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:15 PM Page 3 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.04
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.04tblFleetMix LDT2 0.20 0.13tblFleetMix LDT2 0.20 0.13tblFleetMix MDV 0.15 0.09 tblFleetMix MDV 0.15 0.09tblFleetMix MHD 8.2600e-003 0.18 tblFleetMix MHD 8.2600e-003 0.18
tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 1,510.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 194,300.00 194,304.00tblLandUse LotAcreage 4.22 9.20tblLandUse LotAcreage 4.46 9.20 tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 5.00 7.00tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 5.00 7.00tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 5.00 7.00tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 5.00 7.00tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 13.00 7.00tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 13.00 7.00tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.74 0.00tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.12 1.71tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.74 0.00tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 2.12 0.00tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.74 1.71tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 2.12 1.71 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:15 PM Page 4 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 89.2856 35.5890 28.7985 0.0677 19.8350 1.4338 21.1018 10.1497 1.3194 11.3152 6,679.440 8 Maximum 89.2856 35.5890 28.7985 0.0677 19.8350 1.4338 21.1018 10.1497 1.3194 11.3152 6,679.440 8 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 89.1534 31.0516 37.4699 0.0677 7.8442 1.3087 8.7912 3.9872 1.3083 4.9341 6,679.440 8 Maximum 89.1534 31.0516 37.4699 0.0677 7.8442 1.3087 8.7912 3.9872 1.3083 4.9341 6,679.440 8 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.15 12.75 -30.11 0.00 60.45 8.72 58.34 60.72 0.84 56.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:15 PM Page 5 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 10.5292 5.0000e004 0.0549 0.0000 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 0.1255 Energy 0.0403 0.3662 0.3076 2.2000e003 0.0278 0.0278 0.0278 0.0278 442.0759 Mobile 1.9064 12.4907 15.7301 0.0622 3.4764 0.0891 3.5655 0.9562 0.0849 1.0410 6,822.642 2 Total 12.4758 12.8575 16.0926 0.0644 3.4764 0.1171 3.5935 0.9562 0.1129 1.0690 7,264.843 5 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 8.0031 5.0000e004 0.0549 0.0000 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 0.1255 Energy 0.0403 0.3662 0.3076 2.2000e003 0.0278 0.0278 0.0278 0.0278 442.0759 Mobile 1.9064 12.4907 15.7301 0.0622 3.4764 0.0891 3.5655 0.9562 0.0849 1.0410 6,822.642 2 Total 9.9498 12.8575 16.0926 0.0644 3.4764 0.1171 3.5935 0.9562 0.1129 1.0690 7,264.843 5 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:15 PM Page 6 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2023 1/27/2023 5 20
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/30/2023 2/10/2023 5 103 Grading Grading 2/13/2023 3/24/2023 5 304 Building Construction Building Construction 3/27/2023 9/8/2023 5 120 5 Paving Paving 9/11/2023 10/6/2023 5 20
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 10/9/2023 11/3/2023 5 20 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
20.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 567,263; Non-Residential Outdoor: 189,088; Striped Parking Area: 3,840 (Architectural Coating – sqft)Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 90Acres of Paving: 1.44 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:15 PM Page 7 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
Grading
3.1 Mitigation Measures ConstructionUse Cleaner Engines for Construction EquipmentUse Soil Stabilizer Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 23.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTSite Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTGrading 8 20.00 0.00 189.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTBuilding Construction 9 186.00 72.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTPaving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 37.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:15 PM Page 8 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.2588 0.0000 0.2588 0.0392 0.0000 0.0392 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 0.9975 0.9975 0.9280 0.9280 3,773.218 3 Total 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 0.2588 0.9975 1.2563 0.0392 0.9280 0.9672 3,773.218 3 Water Exposed AreaReduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:15 PM Page 9 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 3.1600e003 0.1883 0.0369 7.1000e- 004 0.0201 1.5200e- 003 0.0216 5.5100e- 003 1.4600e- 003 6.9700e- 003 81.6052 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0474 0.0314 0.4090 1.2500e003 0.1483 7.1000e- 004 0.1490 0.0393 6.6000e- 004 0.0400 129.2270 Total 0.0506 0.2197 0.4459 1.9600e003 0.1684 2.2300e- 003 0.1706 0.0448 2.1200e- 003 0.0470 210.8322 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.1009 0.0000 0.1009 0.0153 0.0000 0.0153 0.0000 Off-Road 0.9246 18.3130 24.6739 0.0388 0.8627 0.8627 0.8627 0.8627 3,773.218 3 Total 0.9246 18.3130 24.6739 0.0388 0.1009 0.8627 0.9636 0.0153 0.8627 0.8780 3,773.218 3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:15 PM Page 10 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 3.1600e003 0.1883 0.0369 7.1000e- 004 0.0201 1.5200e- 003 0.0216 5.5100e- 003 1.4600e- 003 6.9700e- 003 81.6052 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0474 0.0314 0.4090 1.2500e003 0.1483 7.1000e- 004 0.1490 0.0393 6.6000e- 004 0.0400 129.2270 Total 0.0506 0.2197 0.4459 1.9600e003 0.1684 2.2300e- 003 0.1706 0.0448 2.1200e- 003 0.0470 210.8322 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.3 Site Preparation - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 1.2660 1.2660 1.1647 1.1647 3,717.121 9 Total 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 19.6570 1.2660 20.9230 10.1025 1.1647 11.2672 3,717.121 9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:15 PM Page 11 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0569 0.0376 0.4908 1.5000e003 0.1780 8.5000e- 004 0.1788 0.0472 7.9000e- 004 0.0480 155.0724 Total 0.0569 0.0376 0.4908 1.5000e003 0.1780 8.5000e- 004 0.1788 0.0472 7.9000e- 004 0.0480 155.0724 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.6662 0.0000 7.6662 3.9400 0.0000 3.9400 0.0000 Off-Road 0.9312 19.0656 22.9600 0.0381 0.9462 0.9462 0.9462 0.9462 3,717.121 9 Total 0.9312 19.0656 22.9600 0.0381 7.6662 0.9462 8.6124 3.9400 0.9462 4.8861 3,717.121 9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:15 PM Page 12 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0569 0.0376 0.4908 1.5000e003 0.1780 8.5000e- 004 0.1788 0.0472 7.9000e- 004 0.0480 155.0724 Total 0.0569 0.0376 0.4908 1.5000e003 0.1780 8.5000e- 004 0.1788 0.0472 7.9000e- 004 0.0480 155.0724 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 9.2129 0.0000 9.2129 3.6552 0.0000 3.6552 0.0000 Off-Road 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 1.4245 1.4245 1.3105 1.3105 6,060.083 6 Total 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 9.2129 1.4245 10.6373 3.6552 1.3105 4.9657 6,060.083 6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:15 PM Page 13 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0173 1.0316 0.2020 3.9100e003 0.1102 8.3300e- 003 0.1185 0.0302 7.9700e- 003 0.0382 447.0546 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0632 0.0418 0.5453 1.6700e003 0.1977 9.5000e- 004 0.1987 0.0524 8.7000e- 004 0.0533 172.3027 Total 0.0805 1.0734 0.7473 5.5800e003 0.3079 9.2800e- 003 0.3172 0.0826 8.8400e- 003 0.0915 619.3572 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.5930 0.0000 3.5930 1.4255 0.0000 1.4255 0.0000 Off-Road 1.5231 29.9782 36.7226 0.0621 1.2994 1.2994 1.2994 1.2994 6,060.083 6 Total 1.5231 29.9782 36.7226 0.0621 3.5930 1.2994 4.8924 1.4255 1.2994 2.7249 6,060.083 6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:15 PM Page 14 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0173 1.0316 0.2020 3.9100e003 0.1102 8.3300e- 003 0.1185 0.0302 7.9700e- 003 0.0382 447.0546 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0632 0.0418 0.5453 1.6700e003 0.1977 9.5000e- 004 0.1987 0.0524 8.7000e- 004 0.0533 172.3027 Total 0.0805 1.0734 0.7473 5.5800e003 0.3079 9.2800e- 003 0.3172 0.0826 8.8400e- 003 0.0915 619.3572 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.5 Building Construction - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,570.406 1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,570.406 1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:15 PM Page 15 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0855 2.8848 0.9360 0.0107 0.3345 0.0168 0.3514 0.0964 0.0161 0.1125 1,194.962 3 Worker 0.5876 0.3889 5.0714 0.0155 1.8388 8.8200e003 1.8476 0.4877 8.1300e- 003 0.4958 1,602.414 7 Total 0.6731 3.2737 6.0074 0.0262 2.1734 0.0256 2.1990 0.5841 0.0242 0.6083 2,797.377 0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6739 14.2261 17.8738 0.0269 0.9036 0.9036 0.9036 0.9036 2,570.406 1 Total 0.6739 14.2261 17.8738 0.0269 0.9036 0.9036 0.9036 0.9036 2,570.406 1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:15 PM Page 16 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0855 2.8848 0.9360 0.0107 0.3345 0.0168 0.3514 0.0964 0.0161 0.1125 1,194.962 3 Worker 0.5876 0.3889 5.0714 0.0155 1.8388 8.8200e003 1.8476 0.4877 8.1300e- 003 0.4958 1,602.414 7 Total 0.6731 3.2737 6.0074 0.0262 2.1734 0.0256 2.1990 0.5841 0.0242 0.6083 2,797.377 0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,225.433 6 Paving 0.1886 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 1.2214 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,225.433 6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:15 PM Page 17 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0474 0.0314 0.4090 1.2500e003 0.1483 7.1000e- 004 0.1490 0.0393 6.6000e- 004 0.0400 129.2270 Total 0.0474 0.0314 0.4090 1.2500e003 0.1483 7.1000e- 004 0.1490 0.0393 6.6000e- 004 0.0400 129.2270 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.5609 11.2952 17.2957 0.0228 0.6093 0.6093 0.6093 0.6093 2,225.433 6 Paving 0.1886 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.7496 11.2952 17.2957 0.0228 0.6093 0.6093 0.6093 0.6093 2,225.433 6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:15 PM Page 18 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0474 0.0314 0.4090 1.2500e003 0.1483 7.1000e- 004 0.1490 0.0393 6.6000e- 004 0.0400 129.2270 Total 0.0474 0.0314 0.4090 1.2500e003 0.1483 7.1000e- 004 0.1490 0.0393 6.6000e- 004 0.0400 129.2270 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 88.9771 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e003 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.8690 Total 89.1687 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e003 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.8690 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:15 PM Page 19 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.1169 0.0774 1.0088 3.0900e003 0.3658 1.7500e- 003 0.3675 0.0970 1.6200e- 003 0.0986 318.7599 Total 0.1169 0.0774 1.0088 3.0900e003 0.3658 1.7500e- 003 0.3675 0.0970 1.6200e- 003 0.0986 318.7599 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 88.9771 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0594 1.3570 1.8324 2.9700e003 0.0951 0.0951 0.0951 0.0951 281.8690 Total 89.0365 1.3570 1.8324 2.9700e003 0.0951 0.0951 0.0951 0.0951 281.8690 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:15 PM Page 20 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.1169 0.0774 1.0088 3.0900e003 0.3658 1.7500e- 003 0.3675 0.0970 1.6200e- 003 0.0986 318.7599 Total 0.1169 0.0774 1.0088 3.0900e003 0.3658 1.7500e- 003 0.3675 0.0970 1.6200e- 003 0.0986 318.7599 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:15 PM Page 21 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 1.9064 12.4907 15.7301 0.0622 3.4764 0.0891 3.5655 0.9562 0.0849 1.0410 6,822.642 2 Unmitigated 1.9064 12.4907 15.7301 0.0622 3.4764 0.0891 3.5655 0.9562 0.0849 1.0410 6,822.642 2 4.2 Trip Summary Information4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 332.25 0.00 0.00 564,142 564,142 Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 314.42 314.42 0.00 640,635 640,635 Total 646.67 314.42 0.00 1,204,777 1,204,777
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Parking Lot 13.00 5.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
R il
7.00 7.00 7.00 59.00 0.00 41.00 92 5 3
Refrigerated Warehouse-No
R il
7.00 7.00 7.00 59.00 0.00 41.00 92 5 3
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Parking Lot 0.486418 0.056693 0.203223 0.148945 0.038507 0.009459 0.008260 0.005996 0.000952 0.000366 0.033245 0.001002 0.006934 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail
0.304002 0.035433 0.127011 0.093089 0.038507 0.009459 0.175000 0.175000 0.000952 0.000366 0.033245 0.001002 0.006934 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:15 PM Page 22 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.304002 0.035433 0.127011 0.093089 0.038507 0.009459 0.175000 0.175000 0.000952 0.000366 0.033245 0.001002 0.006934
5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.0403 0.3662 0.3076 2.2000e003 0.0278 0.0278 0.0278 0.0278 442.0759 NaturalGasUnmitigated
0.0403 0.3662 0.3076 2.2000e003 0.0278 0.0278 0.0278 0.0278 442.0759 Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:15 PM Page 23 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
1904.2 0.0205 0.1867 0.1568 1.1200e003 0.0142 0.0142 0.0142 0.0142 225.3546 Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
1831.25 0.0198 0.1795 0.1508 1.0800e003 0.0136 0.0136 0.0136 0.0136 216.7213 Total 0.0403 0.3662 0.3076 2.2000e003 0.0278 0.0278 0.0278 0.0278 442.0759 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:15 PM Page 24 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
6.0 Area Detail6.1 Mitigation Measures AreaUse Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential InteriorUse Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential ExteriorUse Low VOC Cleaning Supplies NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
1.9042 0.0205 0.1867 0.1568 1.1200e003 0.0142 0.0142 0.0142 0.0142 225.3546 Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
1.83125 0.0198 0.1795 0.1508 1.0800e003 0.0136 0.0136 0.0136 0.0136 216.7213 Total 0.0403 0.3662 0.3076 2.2000e003 0.0278 0.0278 0.0278 0.0278 442.0759 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:15 PM Page 25 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 8.0031 5.0000e004 0.0549 0.0000 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 0.1255 Unmitigated 10.5292 5.0000e004 0.0549 0.0000 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 0.1255
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
2.4085 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
8.1156 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 5.0600e003 5.0000e- 004 0.0549 0.0000 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 0.1255 Total 10.5291 5.0000e004 0.0549 0.0000 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 0.1255 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:15 PM Page 26 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
6.2 Area by SubCategory
7.0 Water Detail7.1 Mitigation Measures WaterInstall Low Flow Bathroom FaucetInstall Low Flow Kitchen FaucetInstall Low Flow ToiletInstall Low Flow ShowerUse Water Efficient Irrigation System ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
0.4876 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
7.5105 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 5.0600e003 5.0000e- 004 0.0549 0.0000 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 0.1255 Total 8.0031 5.0000e004 0.0549 0.0000 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 0.1255 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:15 PM Page 27 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
11.0 Vegetation
8.0 Waste Detail8.1 Mitigation Measures WasteInstitute Recycling and Composting Services9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:15 PM Page 28 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project
San Luis Obispo County, Winter
Project Characteristics - Land Use - Warehouses-No Rail. 194.304 KSF, 181.21 KSF. Parking area assumes max 160 parking spacesConstruction Phase - Construction based on model defaults and information provided. Tilt=up construction assumes 6 month building construction period.Off-road Equipment - Offroad equipment based on model defaults.Trips and VMT - Construction trips based on model defaultsDemolition - 5093 sf of building floor area to be demo'dGrading - Import of 815 cy for Dauo warehouse and 695 cy for Stravinski warehouse. 1510 cy total. No export.
Architectural Coating - Arch coating based on model defaults. Assumes use of low-VOC (50 g/L or less) content arch paint Vehicle Trips - Operational trip gen 1.71/KSF derived from the traffic analysis prepared for the project. Trip distances based on total avg of 7 miles/trip per traffic VMT analysis.
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 194.30 1000sqft 9.20 194,304.00 0 Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 183.87 1000sqft 9.20 183,871.00 0 Parking Lot 160.00 Space 1.44 64,000.00 0
1.2 Other Project CharacteristicsUrbanizationClimate Zone Urban4
Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days) 3.2 44
1.0 Project CharacteristicsUtility Company1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Pacific Gas and Electric Company
2024 Operational Year
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
203.98 0.033 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.004 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:10 PM Page 1 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Assumes 50%CE for unpaved roads, 61%CE for graded surfaces, 15mph onsite speed limit, T3 equipment included for informational purposesArea Mitigation - Includes the use of low-VOC content products Water Mitigation - Includes installation of low-flow water fixtures and water-efficient irrigation systemsWaste Mitigation - Assumes minimum waste reduction of 50%Fleet Mix - Adjusted to reflect estimated 35% truck (MHD & HHD). Emp trips assumes LDA, LDT1, LDT2, MDV adjusted equally to account for increased truck trips. All other veh cats based on model defaults.
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250.00 50.00tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250.00 50.00 tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintNonresidentialExteriorV alue
250 50
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintNonresidentialInteriorV alue
250 50
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 5.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 6.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 9.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:10 PM Page 2 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 120.00
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 12/5/2022 1/27/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 12/19/2022 2/10/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 1/30/2023 3/24/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 3/25/2024 9/8/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 4/22/2024 10/6/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 5/20/2024 11/3/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 11/8/2022 1/1/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 12/6/2022 1/30/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 12/20/2022 2/13/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 1/31/2023 3/27/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 3/26/2024 9/11/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 4/23/2024 10/9/2023 tblFleetMix HHD 5.9960e-003 0.18
tblFleetMix HHD 5.9960e-003 0.18tblFleetMix LDA 0.49 0.30 tblFleetMix LDA 0.49 0.30
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:10 PM Page 3 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.04
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.04tblFleetMix LDT2 0.20 0.13tblFleetMix LDT2 0.20 0.13tblFleetMix MDV 0.15 0.09 tblFleetMix MDV 0.15 0.09tblFleetMix MHD 8.2600e-003 0.18 tblFleetMix MHD 8.2600e-003 0.18
tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 1,510.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 194,300.00 194,304.00tblLandUse LotAcreage 4.22 9.20tblLandUse LotAcreage 4.46 9.20 tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 5.00 7.00tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 5.00 7.00tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 5.00 7.00tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 5.00 7.00tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 13.00 7.00tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 13.00 7.00tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.74 0.00tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.12 1.71tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.74 0.00tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 2.12 0.00tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.74 1.71tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 2.12 1.71 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:10 PM Page 4 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 89.2978 35.6242 28.7885 0.0676 19.8350 1.4338 21.1018 10.1497 1.3194 11.3152 6,672.762 7 Maximum 89.2978 35.6242 28.7885 0.0676 19.8350 1.4338 21.1018 10.1497 1.3194 11.3152 6,672.762 7 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 89.1655 31.0868 37.4599 0.0676 7.8442 1.3087 8.7912 3.9872 1.3083 4.9341 6,672.762 7 Maximum 89.1655 31.0868 37.4599 0.0676 7.8442 1.3087 8.7912 3.9872 1.3083 4.9341 6,672.762 7 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.15 12.74 -30.12 0.00 60.45 8.72 58.34 60.72 0.84 56.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:10 PM Page 5 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 10.5292 5.0000e004 0.0549 0.0000 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 0.1255 Energy 0.0403 0.3662 0.3076 2.2000e003 0.0278 0.0278 0.0278 0.0278 442.0759 Mobile 1.8660 12.9691 16.7515 0.0617 3.4764 0.0894 3.5658 0.9562 0.0851 1.0413 6,770.558 5 Total 12.4354 13.3358 17.1140 0.0639 3.4764 0.1174 3.5938 0.9562 0.1132 1.0693 7,212.759 8 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 8.0031 5.0000e004 0.0549 0.0000 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 0.1255 Energy 0.0403 0.3662 0.3076 2.2000e003 0.0278 0.0278 0.0278 0.0278 442.0759 Mobile 1.8660 12.9691 16.7515 0.0617 3.4764 0.0894 3.5658 0.9562 0.0851 1.0413 6,770.558 5 Total 9.9094 13.3358 17.1140 0.0639 3.4764 0.1174 3.5938 0.9562 0.1132 1.0693 7,212.759 8 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:10 PM Page 6 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2023 1/27/2023 5 20
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/30/2023 2/10/2023 5 103 Grading Grading 2/13/2023 3/24/2023 5 304 Building Construction Building Construction 3/27/2023 9/8/2023 5 120 5 Paving Paving 9/11/2023 10/6/2023 5 20
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 10/9/2023 11/3/2023 5 20 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
20.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 567,263; Non-Residential Outdoor: 189,088; Striped Parking Area: 3,840 (Architectural Coating – sqft)Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 90Acres of Paving: 1.44 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:10 PM Page 7 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
Grading
3.1 Mitigation Measures ConstructionUse Cleaner Engines for Construction EquipmentUse Soil Stabilizer Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 23.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTSite Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTGrading 8 20.00 0.00 189.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTBuilding Construction 9 186.00 72.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTPaving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 37.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:10 PM Page 8 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.2588 0.0000 0.2588 0.0392 0.0000 0.0392 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 0.9975 0.9975 0.9280 0.9280 3,773.218 3 Total 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 0.2588 0.9975 1.2563 0.0392 0.9280 0.9672 3,773.218 3 Water Exposed AreaReduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:10 PM Page 9 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 3.0100e003 0.1937 0.0374 7.2000e- 004 0.0201 1.5200e- 003 0.0216 5.5100e- 003 1.4600e- 003 6.9700e- 003 81.6704 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0523 0.0356 0.3993 1.2000e003 0.1483 7.1000e- 004 0.1490 0.0393 6.6000e- 004 0.0400 123.9505 Total 0.0553 0.2293 0.4367 1.9200e003 0.1684 2.2300e- 003 0.1706 0.0448 2.1200e- 003 0.0470 205.6209 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.1009 0.0000 0.1009 0.0153 0.0000 0.0153 0.0000 Off-Road 0.9246 18.3130 24.6739 0.0388 0.8627 0.8627 0.8627 0.8627 3,773.218 3 Total 0.9246 18.3130 24.6739 0.0388 0.1009 0.8627 0.9636 0.0153 0.8627 0.8780 3,773.218 3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:10 PM Page 10 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 3.0100e003 0.1937 0.0374 7.2000e- 004 0.0201 1.5200e- 003 0.0216 5.5100e- 003 1.4600e- 003 6.9700e- 003 81.6704 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0523 0.0356 0.3993 1.2000e003 0.1483 7.1000e- 004 0.1490 0.0393 6.6000e- 004 0.0400 123.9505 Total 0.0553 0.2293 0.4367 1.9200e003 0.1684 2.2300e- 003 0.1706 0.0448 2.1200e- 003 0.0470 205.6209 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.3 Site Preparation - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 1.2660 1.2660 1.1647 1.1647 3,717.121 9 Total 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 19.6570 1.2660 20.9230 10.1025 1.1647 11.2672 3,717.121 9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:10 PM Page 11 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0628 0.0427 0.4791 1.4400e003 0.1780 8.5000e- 004 0.1788 0.0472 7.9000e- 004 0.0480 148.7406 Total 0.0628 0.0427 0.4791 1.4400e003 0.1780 8.5000e- 004 0.1788 0.0472 7.9000e- 004 0.0480 148.7406 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.6662 0.0000 7.6662 3.9400 0.0000 3.9400 0.0000 Off-Road 0.9312 19.0656 22.9600 0.0381 0.9462 0.9462 0.9462 0.9462 3,717.121 9 Total 0.9312 19.0656 22.9600 0.0381 7.6662 0.9462 8.6124 3.9400 0.9462 4.8861 3,717.121 9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:10 PM Page 12 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0628 0.0427 0.4791 1.4400e003 0.1780 8.5000e- 004 0.1788 0.0472 7.9000e- 004 0.0480 148.7406 Total 0.0628 0.0427 0.4791 1.4400e003 0.1780 8.5000e- 004 0.1788 0.0472 7.9000e- 004 0.0480 148.7406 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 9.2129 0.0000 9.2129 3.6552 0.0000 3.6552 0.0000 Off-Road 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 1.4245 1.4245 1.3105 1.3105 6,060.083 6 Total 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 9.2129 1.4245 10.6373 3.6552 1.3105 4.9657 6,060.083 6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:10 PM Page 13 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0165 1.0611 0.2050 3.9200e003 0.1102 8.3500e- 003 0.1185 0.0302 7.9900e- 003 0.0382 447.4118 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0698 0.0475 0.5323 1.6000e003 0.1977 9.5000e- 004 0.1987 0.0524 8.7000e- 004 0.0533 165.2673 Total 0.0863 1.1086 0.7373 5.5200e003 0.3079 9.3000e- 003 0.3172 0.0826 8.8600e- 003 0.0915 612.6791 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.5930 0.0000 3.5930 1.4255 0.0000 1.4255 0.0000 Off-Road 1.5231 29.9782 36.7226 0.0621 1.2994 1.2994 1.2994 1.2994 6,060.083 6 Total 1.5231 29.9782 36.7226 0.0621 3.5930 1.2994 4.8924 1.4255 1.2994 2.7249 6,060.083 6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:10 PM Page 14 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0165 1.0611 0.2050 3.9200e003 0.1102 8.3500e- 003 0.1185 0.0302 7.9900e- 003 0.0382 447.4118 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0698 0.0475 0.5323 1.6000e003 0.1977 9.5000e- 004 0.1987 0.0524 8.7000e- 004 0.0533 165.2673 Total 0.0863 1.1086 0.7373 5.5200e003 0.3079 9.3000e- 003 0.3172 0.0826 8.8600e- 003 0.0915 612.6791 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.5 Building Construction - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,570.406 1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,570.406 1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:10 PM Page 15 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0836 2.9813 0.9724 0.0107 0.3345 0.0169 0.3515 0.0964 0.0162 0.1126 1,196.986 6 Worker 0.6487 0.4415 4.9507 0.0149 1.8388 8.8200e003 1.8476 0.4877 8.1300e- 003 0.4958 1,536.985 7 Total 0.7323 3.4227 5.9232 0.0256 2.1734 0.0258 2.1991 0.5841 0.0243 0.6084 2,733.972 4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6739 14.2261 17.8738 0.0269 0.9036 0.9036 0.9036 0.9036 2,570.406 1 Total 0.6739 14.2261 17.8738 0.0269 0.9036 0.9036 0.9036 0.9036 2,570.406 1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:10 PM Page 16 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0836 2.9813 0.9724 0.0107 0.3345 0.0169 0.3515 0.0964 0.0162 0.1126 1,196.986 6 Worker 0.6487 0.4415 4.9507 0.0149 1.8388 8.8200e003 1.8476 0.4877 8.1300e- 003 0.4958 1,536.985 7 Total 0.7323 3.4227 5.9232 0.0256 2.1734 0.0258 2.1991 0.5841 0.0243 0.6084 2,733.972 4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,225.433 6 Paving 0.1886 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 1.2214 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,225.433 6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:10 PM Page 17 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0523 0.0356 0.3993 1.2000e003 0.1483 7.1000e- 004 0.1490 0.0393 6.6000e- 004 0.0400 123.9505 Total 0.0523 0.0356 0.3993 1.2000e003 0.1483 7.1000e- 004 0.1490 0.0393 6.6000e- 004 0.0400 123.9505 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.5609 11.2952 17.2957 0.0228 0.6093 0.6093 0.6093 0.6093 2,225.433 6 Paving 0.1886 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.7496 11.2952 17.2957 0.0228 0.6093 0.6093 0.6093 0.6093 2,225.433 6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:10 PM Page 18 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0523 0.0356 0.3993 1.2000e003 0.1483 7.1000e- 004 0.1490 0.0393 6.6000e- 004 0.0400 123.9505 Total 0.0523 0.0356 0.3993 1.2000e003 0.1483 7.1000e- 004 0.1490 0.0393 6.6000e- 004 0.0400 123.9505 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 88.9771 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e003 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.8690 Total 89.1687 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e003 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.8690 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:10 PM Page 19 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.1291 0.0878 0.9848 2.9600e003 0.3658 1.7500e- 003 0.3675 0.0970 1.6200e- 003 0.0986 305.7445 Total 0.1291 0.0878 0.9848 2.9600e003 0.3658 1.7500e- 003 0.3675 0.0970 1.6200e- 003 0.0986 305.7445 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 88.9771 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0594 1.3570 1.8324 2.9700e003 0.0951 0.0951 0.0951 0.0951 281.8690 Total 89.0365 1.3570 1.8324 2.9700e003 0.0951 0.0951 0.0951 0.0951 281.8690 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:10 PM Page 20 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.1291 0.0878 0.9848 2.9600e003 0.3658 1.7500e- 003 0.3675 0.0970 1.6200e- 003 0.0986 305.7445 Total 0.1291 0.0878 0.9848 2.9600e003 0.3658 1.7500e- 003 0.3675 0.0970 1.6200e- 003 0.0986 305.7445 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:10 PM Page 21 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 1.8660 12.9691 16.7515 0.0617 3.4764 0.0894 3.5658 0.9562 0.0851 1.0413 6,770.558 5 Unmitigated 1.8660 12.9691 16.7515 0.0617 3.4764 0.0894 3.5658 0.9562 0.0851 1.0413 6,770.558 5 4.2 Trip Summary Information4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 332.25 0.00 0.00 564,142 564,142 Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 314.42 314.42 0.00 640,635 640,635 Total 646.67 314.42 0.00 1,204,777 1,204,777
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Parking Lot 13.00 5.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
R il
7.00 7.00 7.00 59.00 0.00 41.00 92 5 3
Refrigerated Warehouse-No
R il
7.00 7.00 7.00 59.00 0.00 41.00 92 5 3
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Parking Lot 0.486418 0.056693 0.203223 0.148945 0.038507 0.009459 0.008260 0.005996 0.000952 0.000366 0.033245 0.001002 0.006934 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail
0.304002 0.035433 0.127011 0.093089 0.038507 0.009459 0.175000 0.175000 0.000952 0.000366 0.033245 0.001002 0.006934 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:10 PM Page 22 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.304002 0.035433 0.127011 0.093089 0.038507 0.009459 0.175000 0.175000 0.000952 0.000366 0.033245 0.001002 0.006934
5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.0403 0.3662 0.3076 2.2000e003 0.0278 0.0278 0.0278 0.0278 442.0759 NaturalGasUnmitigated
0.0403 0.3662 0.3076 2.2000e003 0.0278 0.0278 0.0278 0.0278 442.0759 Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:10 PM Page 23 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
1904.2 0.0205 0.1867 0.1568 1.1200e003 0.0142 0.0142 0.0142 0.0142 225.3546 Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
1831.25 0.0198 0.1795 0.1508 1.0800e003 0.0136 0.0136 0.0136 0.0136 216.7213 Total 0.0403 0.3662 0.3076 2.2000e003 0.0278 0.0278 0.0278 0.0278 442.0759 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:10 PM Page 24 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
6.0 Area Detail6.1 Mitigation Measures AreaUse Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential InteriorUse Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential ExteriorUse Low VOC Cleaning Supplies NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
1.9042 0.0205 0.1867 0.1568 1.1200e003 0.0142 0.0142 0.0142 0.0142 225.3546 Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
1.83125 0.0198 0.1795 0.1508 1.0800e003 0.0136 0.0136 0.0136 0.0136 216.7213 Total 0.0403 0.3662 0.3076 2.2000e003 0.0278 0.0278 0.0278 0.0278 442.0759 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:10 PM Page 25 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 8.0031 5.0000e004 0.0549 0.0000 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 0.1255 Unmitigated 10.5292 5.0000e004 0.0549 0.0000 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 0.1255
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
2.4085 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
8.1156 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 5.0600e003 5.0000e- 004 0.0549 0.0000 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 0.1255 Total 10.5291 5.0000e004 0.0549 0.0000 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 0.1255 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:10 PM Page 26 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
6.2 Area by SubCategory
7.0 Water Detail7.1 Mitigation Measures WaterInstall Low Flow Bathroom FaucetInstall Low Flow Kitchen FaucetInstall Low Flow ToiletInstall Low Flow ShowerUse Water Efficient Irrigation System ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
0.4876 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
7.5105 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 5.0600e003 5.0000e- 004 0.0549 0.0000 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 0.1255 Total 8.0031 5.0000e004 0.0549 0.0000 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 0.1255 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:10 PM Page 27 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
11.0 Vegetation
8.0 Waste Detail8.1 Mitigation Measures WasteInstitute Recycling and Composting Services9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:10 PM Page 28 of 28 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project
San Luis Obispo County, Annual
Project Characteristics - Land Use - Warehouses-No Rail. 194.304 KSF, 181.21 KSF. Parking area assumes max 160 parking spacesConstruction Phase - Construction based on model defaults and information provided. Tilt=up construction assumes 6 month building construction period.Off-road Equipment - Offroad equipment based on model defaults.Trips and VMT - Construction trips based on model defaultsDemolition - 5093 sf of building floor area to be demo'dGrading - Import of 815 cy for Dauo warehouse and 695 cy for Stravinski warehouse. 1510 cy total. No export.
Architectural Coating - Arch coating based on model defaults. Assumes use of low-VOC (50 g/L or less) content arch paint Vehicle Trips - Operational trip gen 1.71/KSF derived from the traffic analysis prepared for the project. Trip distances based on total avg of 7 miles/trip per traffic VMT analysis.
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 194.30 1000sqft 9.20 194,304.00 0 Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 183.87 1000sqft 9.20 183,871.00 0 Parking Lot 160.00 Space 1.44 64,000.00 0
1.2 Other Project CharacteristicsUrbanizationClimate Zone Urban4
Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days) 3.2 44
1.0 Project CharacteristicsUtility Company1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Pacific Gas and Electric Company
2024 Operational Year
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
203.98 0.033 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.004 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:16 PM Page 1 of 34 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Assumes 50%CE for unpaved roads, 61%CE for graded surfaces, 15mph onsite speed limit, T3 equipment included for informational purposesArea Mitigation - Includes the use of low-VOC content products Water Mitigation - Includes installation of low-flow water fixtures and water-efficient irrigation systemsWaste Mitigation - Assumes minimum waste reduction of 50%Fleet Mix - Adjusted to reflect estimated 35% truck (MHD & HHD). Emp trips assumes LDA, LDT1, LDT2, MDV adjusted equally to account for increased truck trips. All other veh cats based on model defaults.
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250.00 50.00tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250.00 50.00 tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintNonresidentialExteriorV alue
250 50
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintNonresidentialInteriorV alue
250 50
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 5.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 6.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 9.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:16 PM Page 2 of 34 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 120.00
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 12/5/2022 1/27/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 12/19/2022 2/10/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 1/30/2023 3/24/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 3/25/2024 9/8/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 4/22/2024 10/6/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 5/20/2024 11/3/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 11/8/2022 1/1/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 12/6/2022 1/30/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 12/20/2022 2/13/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 1/31/2023 3/27/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 3/26/2024 9/11/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 4/23/2024 10/9/2023 tblFleetMix HHD 5.9960e-003 0.18
tblFleetMix HHD 5.9960e-003 0.18tblFleetMix LDA 0.49 0.30 tblFleetMix LDA 0.49 0.30
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:16 PM Page 3 of 34 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.04
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.04tblFleetMix LDT2 0.20 0.13tblFleetMix LDT2 0.20 0.13tblFleetMix MDV 0.15 0.09 tblFleetMix MDV 0.15 0.09tblFleetMix MHD 8.2600e-003 0.18 tblFleetMix MHD 8.2600e-003 0.18
tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 1,510.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 194,300.00 194,304.00tblLandUse LotAcreage 4.22 9.20tblLandUse LotAcreage 4.46 9.20 tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 5.00 7.00tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 5.00 7.00tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 5.00 7.00tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 5.00 7.00tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 13.00 7.00tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 13.00 7.00tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.74 0.00tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.12 1.71tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.74 0.00tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 2.12 0.00tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.74 1.71tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 2.12 1.71 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:16 PM Page 4 of 34 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 1.1284 2.0731 2.2312 5.0800e003 0.3782 0.0872 0.4654 0.1432 0.0813 0.2245 460.3730 Maximum 1.1284 2.0731 2.2312 5.0800e003 0.3782 0.0872 0.4654 0.1432 0.0813 0.2245 460.3730 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 1.0193 1.9330 2.5603 5.0800e003 0.2323 0.0958 0.3282 0.0787 0.0957 0.1744 460.3727 Maximum 1.0193 1.9330 2.5603 5.0800e003 0.2323 0.0958 0.3282 0.0787 0.0957 0.1744 460.3727 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
9.66 6.75 -14.75 0.00 38.56 -9.91 29.48 45.05 -17.75 22.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:16 PM Page 5 of 34 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 11-8-2022 2-7-2023 0.3292 0.2529
2 2-8-2023 5-7-2023 0.8890 0.7717
3 5-8-2023 8-7-2023 0.6540 0.6193
4 8-8-2023 9-30-2023 0.3096 0.3020
Highest 0.8890 0.7717
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 1.9215 8.0000e005 9.0500e- 003 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 0.0188 Energy 7.3500e003 0.0668 0.0561 4.0000e- 004 5.0800e- 003 5.0800e- 003 5.0800e- 003 5.0800e- 003 305.9958 Mobile 0.2627 1.8456 2.3196 8.8000e003 0.4839 0.0127 0.4966 0.1334 0.0121 0.1456 875.7776 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 178.7714
Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 163.2514
Total 2.1915 1.9125 2.3848 9.2000e003 0.4839 0.0178 0.5017 0.1334 0.0172 0.1507 1,523.815 0 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:16 PM Page 6 of 34 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 1.4605 8.0000e005 9.0500e- 003 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 0.0188 Energy 7.3500e003 0.0668 0.0561 4.0000e- 004 5.0800e- 003 5.0800e- 003 5.0800e- 003 5.0800e- 003 305.9958 Mobile 0.2627 1.8456 2.3196 8.8000e003 0.4839 0.0127 0.4966 0.1334 0.0121 0.1456 875.7776 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 89.3857
Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 130.6011
Total 1.7306 1.9125 2.3848 9.2000e003 0.4839 0.0178 0.5017 0.1334 0.0172 0.1507 1,401.779 0 Mitigated Operational
3.0 Construction DetailConstruction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2023 1/27/2023 5 20
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/30/2023 2/10/2023 5 103 Grading Grading 2/13/2023 3/24/2023 5 30 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
21.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.01 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:16 PM Page 7 of 34 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
4 Building Construction Building Construction 3/27/2023 9/8/2023 5 120 5 Paving Paving 9/11/2023 10/6/2023 5 206 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 10/9/2023 11/3/2023 5 20 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 567,263; Non-Residential Outdoor: 189,088; Striped Parking Area: 3,840 (Architectural Coating Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36 – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 90Acres of Paving: 1.44 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:16 PM Page 8 of 34 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
Paving
3.1 Mitigation Measures ConstructionUse Cleaner Engines for Construction EquipmentUse Soil StabilizerWater Exposed AreaReduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 23.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTSite Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTGrading 8 20.00 0.00 189.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTBuilding Construction 9 186.00 72.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTPaving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 37.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:16 PM Page 9 of 34 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 2.5900e003 0.0000 2.5900e- 003 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0227 0.2148 0.1964 3.9000e004 9.9800e- 003 9.9800e- 003 9.2800e- 003 9.2800e- 003 34.2301 Total 0.0227 0.2148 0.1964 3.9000e004 2.5900e- 003 9.9800e- 003 0.0126 3.9000e- 004 9.2800e- 003 9.6700e- 003 34.2301 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 3.0000e005 1.9400e- 003 3.7000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 2.1000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 0.7406 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 4.8000e004 3.5000e- 004 3.9700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4500e- 003 3.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 1.1323 Total 5.1000e004 2.2900e- 003 4.3400e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.6400e- 003 3.0000e- 005 1.6600e- 003 4.3000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 4.6000e- 004 1.8729 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:16 PM Page 10 of 34 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 1.0100e003 0.0000 1.0100e- 003 1.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.5000e- 004 0.0000 Off-Road 9.2500e003 0.1831 0.2467 3.9000e- 004 8.6300e- 003 8.6300e- 003 8.6300e- 003 8.6300e- 003 34.2300 Total 9.2500e003 0.1831 0.2467 3.9000e- 004 1.0100e- 003 8.6300e- 003 9.6400e- 003 1.5000e- 004 8.6300e- 003 8.7800e- 003 34.2300 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 3.0000e005 1.9400e- 003 3.7000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 2.1000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 0.7406 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 4.8000e004 3.5000e- 004 3.9700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4500e- 003 3.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 1.1323 Total 5.1000e004 2.2900e- 003 4.3400e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.6400e- 003 3.0000e- 005 1.6600e- 003 4.3000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 4.6000e- 004 1.8729 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:16 PM Page 11 of 34 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0983 0.0000 0.0983 0.0505 0.0000 0.0505 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0133 0.1376 0.0912 1.9000e004 6.3300e- 003 6.3300e- 003 5.8200e- 003 5.8200e- 003 16.8606 Total 0.0133 0.1376 0.0912 1.9000e004 0.0983 6.3300e- 003 0.1046 0.0505 5.8200e- 003 0.0563 16.8606 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 2.9000e004 2.1000e- 004 2.3800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 8.7000e- 004 0.0000 8.7000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 0.0000 2.3000e- 004 0.6794 Total 2.9000e004 2.1000e- 004 2.3800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 8.7000e- 004 0.0000 8.7000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 0.0000 2.3000e- 004 0.6794 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:16 PM Page 12 of 34 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0383 0.0000 0.0383 0.0197 0.0000 0.0197 0.0000 Off-Road 4.6600e003 0.0953 0.1148 1.9000e- 004 4.7300e- 003 4.7300e- 003 4.7300e- 003 4.7300e- 003 16.8606 Total 4.6600e003 0.0953 0.1148 1.9000e- 004 0.0383 4.7300e- 003 0.0431 0.0197 4.7300e- 003 0.0244 16.8606 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 2.9000e004 2.1000e- 004 2.3800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 8.7000e- 004 0.0000 8.7000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 0.0000 2.3000e- 004 0.6794 Total 2.9000e004 2.1000e- 004 2.3800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 8.7000e- 004 0.0000 8.7000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 0.0000 2.3000e- 004 0.6794 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:16 PM Page 13 of 34 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1382 0.0000 0.1382 0.0548 0.0000 0.0548 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0498 0.5177 0.4208 9.3000e004 0.0214 0.0214 0.0197 0.0197 82.4642 Total 0.0498 0.5177 0.4208 9.3000e004 0.1382 0.0214 0.1596 0.0548 0.0197 0.0745 82.4642 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 2.5000e004 0.0160 3.0500e- 003 6.0000e- 005 1.6100e- 003 1.3000e- 004 1.7400e- 003 4.4000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 5.6000e- 004 6.0855 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 9.6000e004 7.0000e- 004 7.9400e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.8900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 2.9000e- 003 7.7000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 7.8000e- 004 2.2646 Total 1.2100e003 0.0167 0.0110 8.0000e- 005 4.5000e- 003 1.4000e- 004 4.6400e- 003 1.2100e- 003 1.3000e- 004 1.3400e- 003 8.3501 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:16 PM Page 14 of 34 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0539 0.0000 0.0539 0.0214 0.0000 0.0214 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0229 0.4497 0.5508 9.3000e004 0.0195 0.0195 0.0195 0.0195 82.4641 Total 0.0229 0.4497 0.5508 9.3000e004 0.0539 0.0195 0.0734 0.0214 0.0195 0.0409 82.4641 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 2.5000e004 0.0160 3.0500e- 003 6.0000e- 005 1.6100e- 003 1.3000e- 004 1.7400e- 003 4.4000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 5.6000e- 004 6.0855 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 9.6000e004 7.0000e- 004 7.9400e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.8900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 2.9000e- 003 7.7000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 7.8000e- 004 2.2646 Total 1.2100e003 0.0167 0.0110 8.0000e- 005 4.5000e- 003 1.4000e- 004 4.6400e- 003 1.2100e- 003 1.3000e- 004 1.3400e- 003 8.3501 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:16 PM Page 15 of 34 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0944 0.8631 0.9746 1.6200e003 0.0420 0.0420 0.0395 0.0395 139.9100 Total 0.0944 0.8631 0.9746 1.6200e003 0.0420 0.0420 0.0395 0.0395 139.9100 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 5.0600e003 0.1785 0.0573 6.4000e- 004 0.0196 1.0100e- 003 0.0207 5.6800e- 003 9.7000e- 004 6.6400e- 003 65.0900 Worker 0.0356 0.0259 0.2954 9.0000e004 0.1074 5.3000e- 004 0.1080 0.0286 4.9000e- 004 0.0290 84.2446 Total 0.0406 0.2044 0.3527 1.5400e003 0.1271 1.5400e- 003 0.1286 0.0342 1.4600e- 003 0.0357 149.3346 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:16 PM Page 16 of 34 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0404 0.8536 1.0724 1.6200e003 0.0542 0.0542 0.0542 0.0542 139.9098 Total 0.0404 0.8536 1.0724 1.6200e003 0.0542 0.0542 0.0542 0.0542 139.9098 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 5.0600e003 0.1785 0.0573 6.4000e- 004 0.0196 1.0100e- 003 0.0207 5.6800e- 003 9.7000e- 004 6.6400e- 003 65.0900 Worker 0.0356 0.0259 0.2954 9.0000e004 0.1074 5.3000e- 004 0.1080 0.0286 4.9000e- 004 0.0290 84.2446 Total 0.0406 0.2044 0.3527 1.5400e003 0.1271 1.5400e- 003 0.1286 0.0342 1.4600e- 003 0.0357 149.3346 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:16 PM Page 17 of 34 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0103 0.1019 0.1458 2.3000e004 5.1000e- 003 5.1000e- 003 4.6900e- 003 4.6900e- 003 20.1888 Paving 1.8900e003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0122 0.1019 0.1458 2.3000e004 5.1000e- 003 5.1000e- 003 4.6900e- 003 4.6900e- 003 20.1888 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 4.8000e004 3.5000e- 004 3.9700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4500e- 003 3.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 1.1323 Total 4.8000e004 3.5000e- 004 3.9700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4500e- 003 3.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 1.1323 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:16 PM Page 18 of 34 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 5.6100e003 0.1130 0.1730 2.3000e- 004 6.0900e- 003 6.0900e- 003 6.0900e- 003 6.0900e- 003 20.1888 Paving 1.8900e003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 7.5000e003 0.1130 0.1730 2.3000e- 004 6.0900e- 003 6.0900e- 003 6.0900e- 003 6.0900e- 003 20.1888 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 4.8000e004 3.5000e- 004 3.9700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4500e- 003 3.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 1.1323 Total 4.8000e004 3.5000e- 004 3.9700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4500e- 003 3.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 1.1323 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:16 PM Page 19 of 34 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.8898 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.9200e003 0.0130 0.0181 3.0000e- 005 7.1000e- 004 7.1000e- 004 7.1000e- 004 7.1000e- 004 2.5571 Total 0.8917 0.0130 0.0181 3.0000e005 7.1000e- 004 7.1000e- 004 7.1000e- 004 7.1000e- 004 2.5571 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 1.1800e003 8.6000e- 004 9.7900e- 003 3.0000e- 005 3.5600e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.5800e- 003 9.5000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 9.6000e- 004 2.7931 Total 1.1800e003 8.6000e- 004 9.7900e- 003 3.0000e- 005 3.5600e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.5800e- 003 9.5000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 9.6000e- 004 2.7931 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:16 PM Page 20 of 34 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.8898 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 5.9000e004 0.0136 0.0183 3.0000e- 005 9.5000e- 004 9.5000e- 004 9.5000e- 004 9.5000e- 004 2.5571 Total 0.8904 0.0136 0.0183 3.0000e005 9.5000e- 004 9.5000e- 004 9.5000e- 004 9.5000e- 004 2.5571 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 1.1800e003 8.6000e- 004 9.7900e- 003 3.0000e- 005 3.5600e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.5800e- 003 9.5000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 9.6000e- 004 2.7931 Total 1.1800e003 8.6000e- 004 9.7900e- 003 3.0000e- 005 3.5600e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.5800e- 003 9.5000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 9.6000e- 004 2.7931 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:16 PM Page 21 of 34 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.2627 1.8456 2.3196 8.8000e003 0.4839 0.0127 0.4966 0.1334 0.0121 0.1456 875.7776 Unmitigated 0.2627 1.8456 2.3196 8.8000e003 0.4839 0.0127 0.4966 0.1334 0.0121 0.1456 875.7776
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile4.2 Trip Summary Information4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 332.25 0.00 0.00 564,142 564,142 Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 314.42 314.42 0.00 640,635 640,635 Total 646.67 314.42 0.00 1,204,777 1,204,777
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Parking Lot 13.00 5.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
R il
7.00 7.00 7.00 59.00 0.00 41.00 92 5 3
Refrigerated Warehouse-No
R il
7.00 7.00 7.00 59.00 0.00 41.00 92 5 3
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:16 PM Page 22 of 34 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Parking Lot 0.486418 0.056693 0.203223 0.148945 0.038507 0.009459 0.008260 0.005996 0.000952 0.000366 0.033245 0.001002 0.006934 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail
0.304002 0.035433 0.127011 0.093089 0.038507 0.009459 0.175000 0.175000 0.000952 0.000366 0.033245 0.001002 0.006934 Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.304002 0.035433 0.127011 0.093089 0.038507 0.009459 0.175000 0.175000 0.000952 0.000366 0.033245 0.001002 0.006934
5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 232.8051
Electricity
Unmitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 232.8051
NaturalGas
Mitigated
7.3500e003 0.0668 0.0561 4.0000e- 004 5.0800e- 003 5.0800e- 003 5.0800e- 003 5.0800e- 003 73.1906 NaturalGasUnmitigated
7.3500e003 0.0668 0.0561 4.0000e- 004 5.0800e- 003 5.0800e- 003 5.0800e- 003 5.0800e- 003 73.1906 Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:16 PM Page 23 of 34 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
695032 3.7500e003 0.0341 0.0286 2.0000e- 004 2.5900e- 003 2.5900e- 003 2.5900e- 003 2.5900e- 003 37.3100 Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
668406 3.6000e003 0.0328 0.0275 2.0000e- 004 2.4900e- 003 2.4900e- 003 2.4900e- 003 2.4900e- 003 35.8806 Total 7.3500e003 0.0668 0.0561 4.0000e- 004 5.0800e- 003 5.0800e- 003 5.0800e- 003 5.0800e- 003 73.1906 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:16 PM Page 24 of 34 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
695032 3.7500e003 0.0341 0.0286 2.0000e- 004 2.5900e- 003 2.5900e- 003 2.5900e- 003 2.5900e- 003 37.3100 Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
668406 3.6000e003 0.0328 0.0275 2.0000e- 004 2.4900e- 003 2.4900e- 003 2.4900e- 003 2.4900e- 003 35.8806 Total 7.3500e003 0.0668 0.0561 4.0000e- 004 5.0800e- 003 5.0800e- 003 5.0800e- 003 5.0800e- 003 73.1906 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:16 PM Page 25 of 34 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Parking Lot 22400 2.0930
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
1.78906e
+006
167.1678
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
680064 63.5443
Total 232.8051
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:16 PM Page 26 of 34 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
6.0 Area Detail6.1 Mitigation Measures AreaUse Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential InteriorUse Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential ExteriorUse Low VOC Cleaning Supplies Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Parking Lot 22400 2.0930
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
1.78906e
+006
167.1678
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
680064 63.5443
Total 232.8051
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:16 PM Page 27 of 34 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 1.4605 8.0000e005 9.0500e- 003 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 0.0188 Unmitigated 1.9215 8.0000e005 9.0500e- 003 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 0.0188
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.4396 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
1.4811 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 8.4000e004 8.0000e- 005 9.0500e- 003 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 0.0188 Total 1.9215 8.0000e005 9.0500e- 003 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 0.0188 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:16 PM Page 28 of 34 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
6.2 Area by SubCategory
7.0 Water Detail7.1 Mitigation Measures WaterInstall Low Flow Bathroom FaucetInstall Low Flow Kitchen FaucetInstall Low Flow ToiletInstall Low Flow ShowerUse Water Efficient Irrigation System ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.0890 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
1.3707 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 8.4000e004 8.0000e- 005 9.0500e- 003 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 0.0188 Total 1.4605 8.0000e005 9.0500e- 003 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 0.0188 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:16 PM Page 29 of 34 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 130.6011
Unmitigated 163.2514
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
42.5199 /
0 79.3744
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
44.9319 /
0 83.8769
Total 163.2514
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:16 PM Page 30 of 34 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
34.0159 /
0 63.4995
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
35.9455 /
0 67.1016
Total 130.6011
Mitigated
8.0 Waste Detail8.1 Mitigation Measures WasteInstitute Recycling and Composting Services CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:16 PM Page 31 of 34 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 89.3857
Unmitigated 178.7714
Category/Year8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Parking Lot 0 0.0000
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
172.84 86.9215
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
182.64 91.8499
Total 178.7714
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:16 PM Page 32 of 34 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Parking Lot 0 0.0000
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
86.42 43.4608
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
91.32 45.9250
Total 89.3857
Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:16 PM Page 33 of 34 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
11.0 Vegetation
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:16 PM Page 34 of 34 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project
San Luis Obispo County, Annual
Project Characteristics - Land Use - Warehouses-No Rail. 194.304 KSF, 181.21 KSF. Parking area assumes max 160 parking spacesConstruction Phase - Construction based on model defaults and information provided. Tilt=up construction assumes 6 month building construction period.Off-road Equipment - Offroad equipment based on model defaults.Trips and VMT - Construction trips based on model defaultsDemolition - 5093 sf of building floor area to be demo'dGrading - Import of 815 cy for Dauo warehouse and 695 cy for Stravinski warehouse. 1510 cy total. No export.
Architectural Coating - Arch coating based on model defaults. Assumes use of low-VOC (50 g/L or less) content arch paint Vehicle Trips - Operational trip gen 1.71/KSF derived from the traffic analysis prepared for the project. Trip distances based on total avg of 7 miles/trip per traffic VMT analysis.
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 194.30 1000sqft 9.20 194,304.00 0 Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 183.87 1000sqft 9.20 183,871.00 0 Parking Lot 160.00 Space 1.44 64,000.00 0
1.2 Other Project CharacteristicsUrbanizationClimate Zone Urban4
Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days) 3.2 44
1.0 Project CharacteristicsUtility Company1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Pacific Gas and Electric Company
2030 Operational Year
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
203.98 0.033 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.004 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:57 PM Page 1 of 35 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Assumes 50%CE for unpaved roads, 61%CE for graded surfaces, 15mph onsite speed limit, T3 equipment included for informational purposesArea Mitigation - Includes the use of low-VOC content products Water Mitigation - Includes installation of low-flow water fixtures and water-efficient irrigation systemsWaste Mitigation - Assumes minimum waste reduction of 50%Fleet Mix - Adjusted to reflect estimated 35% truck (MHD & HHD). Emp trips assumes LDA, LDT1, LDT2, MDV adjusted equally to account for increased truck trips. All other veh cats based on model defaults.
Area Coating -
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250.00 50.00tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250.00 50.00 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 5.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 6.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 9.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:57 PM Page 2 of 35 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 120.00
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 12/5/2022 1/27/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 12/19/2022 2/10/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 1/30/2023 3/24/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 3/25/2024 9/8/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 4/22/2024 10/6/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 5/20/2024 11/3/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 11/8/2022 1/1/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 12/6/2022 1/30/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 12/20/2022 2/13/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 1/31/2023 3/27/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 3/26/2024 9/11/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 4/23/2024 10/9/2023 tblFleetMix HHD 5.9170e-003 0.18
tblFleetMix HHD 5.9170e-003 0.18tblFleetMix LDA 0.52 0.30 tblFleetMix LDA 0.52 0.30
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.04
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:57 PM Page 3 of 35 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.04
tblFleetMix LDT2 0.20 0.13tblFleetMix LDT2 0.20 0.13tblFleetMix LHD1 0.03 0.04 tblFleetMix LHD1 0.03 0.04
tblFleetMix LHD2 7.7950e-003 9.4590e-003
tblFleetMix LHD2 7.7950e-003 9.4590e-003
tblFleetMix MCY 0.03 0.03tblFleetMix MCY 0.03 0.03tblFleetMix MDV 0.14 0.09tblFleetMix MDV 0.14 0.09tblFleetMix MH 4.8140e-003 6.9340e-003tblFleetMix MH 4.8140e-003 6.9340e-003tblFleetMix MHD 8.3410e-003 0.18 tblFleetMix MHD 8.3410e-003 0.18tblFleetMix OBUS 8.8500e-004 9.5200e-004 tblFleetMix OBUS 8.8500e-004 9.5200e-004tblFleetMix SBUS 7.9200e-004 1.0020e-003 tblFleetMix SBUS 7.9200e-004 1.0020e-003
tblFleetMix UBUS 3.4600e-004 3.6600e-004
tblFleetMix UBUS 3.4600e-004 3.6600e-004
tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 1,510.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 183,870.00 183,871.00tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 194,300.00 194,304.00tblLandUse LotAcreage 4.22 9.20tblLandUse LotAcreage 4.46 9.20 tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 5.00 7.00tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 5.00 7.00tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 5.00 7.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:57 PM Page 4 of 35 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 5.00 7.00
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 13.00 7.00tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 13.00 7.00tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.74 0.00tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.12 1.71tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.74 0.00tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 2.12 0.00tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.74 1.71tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 2.12 1.71 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:57 PM Page 5 of 35 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 1.1284 2.0731 2.2312 5.0800e003 0.3782 0.0872 0.4654 0.1432 0.0813 0.2245 460.3730 Maximum 1.1284 2.0731 2.2312 5.0800e003 0.3782 0.0872 0.4654 0.1432 0.0813 0.2245 460.3730 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 1.0193 1.9330 2.5603 5.0800e003 0.2323 0.0958 0.3282 0.0787 0.0957 0.1744 460.3727 Maximum 1.0193 1.9330 2.5603 5.0800e003 0.2323 0.0958 0.3282 0.0787 0.0957 0.1744 460.3727 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
9.66 6.75 -14.75 0.00 38.56 -9.91 29.48 45.05 -17.75 22.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:57 PM Page 6 of 35 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 11-8-2022 2-7-2023 0.3292 0.2529
2 2-8-2023 5-7-2023 0.8890 0.7717
3 5-8-2023 8-7-2023 0.6540 0.6193
4 8-8-2023 9-30-2023 0.3096 0.3020
Highest 0.8890 0.7717
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 1.9215 8.0000e005 9.0200e- 003 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 0.0188 Energy 7.3500e003 0.0668 0.0561 4.0000e- 004 5.0800e- 003 5.0800e- 003 5.0800e- 003 5.0800e- 003 305.9958 Mobile 0.2228 1.5787 1.9877 7.7500e003 0.4840 0.0107 0.4946 0.1335 0.0102 0.1436 781.6150 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 178.7714
Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 163.2514
Total 2.1516 1.6457 2.0529 8.1500e003 0.4840 0.0158 0.4998 0.1335 0.0153 0.1488 1,429.652 4 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:57 PM Page 7 of 35 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 1.8110 8.0000e005 9.0200e- 003 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 0.0188 Energy 7.3500e003 0.0668 0.0561 4.0000e- 004 5.0800e- 003 5.0800e- 003 5.0800e- 003 5.0800e- 003 305.9958 Mobile 0.2228 1.5787 1.9877 7.7500e003 0.4840 0.0107 0.4946 0.1335 0.0102 0.1436 781.6150 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 89.3857
Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 130.6011
Total 2.0412 1.6457 2.0529 8.1500e003 0.4840 0.0158 0.4998 0.1335 0.0153 0.1488 1,307.616 4 Mitigated Operational
3.0 Construction DetailConstruction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2023 1/27/2023 5 20
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/30/2023 2/10/2023 5 103 Grading Grading 2/13/2023 3/24/2023 5 30 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
5.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.54 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:57 PM Page 8 of 35 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
4 Building Construction Building Construction 3/27/2023 9/8/2023 5 120 5 Paving Paving 9/11/2023 10/6/2023 5 206 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 10/9/2023 11/3/2023 5 20 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 567,263; Non-Residential Outdoor: 189,088; Striped Parking Area: 3,840 (Architectural Coating Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36 – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 90Acres of Paving: 1.44 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:57 PM Page 9 of 35 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
Paving
3.1 Mitigation Measures ConstructionUse Cleaner Engines for Construction EquipmentUse Soil StabilizerWater Exposed AreaReduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 23.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTSite Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTGrading 8 20.00 0.00 189.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTBuilding Construction 9 186.00 72.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTPaving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 37.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:57 PM Page 10 of 35 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 2.5900e003 0.0000 2.5900e- 003 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0227 0.2148 0.1964 3.9000e004 9.9800e- 003 9.9800e- 003 9.2800e- 003 9.2800e- 003 34.2301 Total 0.0227 0.2148 0.1964 3.9000e004 2.5900e- 003 9.9800e- 003 0.0126 3.9000e- 004 9.2800e- 003 9.6700e- 003 34.2301 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 3.0000e005 1.9400e- 003 3.7000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 2.1000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 0.7406 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 4.8000e004 3.5000e- 004 3.9700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4500e- 003 3.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 1.1323 Total 5.1000e004 2.2900e- 003 4.3400e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.6400e- 003 3.0000e- 005 1.6600e- 003 4.3000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 4.6000e- 004 1.8729 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:57 PM Page 11 of 35 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 1.0100e003 0.0000 1.0100e- 003 1.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.5000e- 004 0.0000 Off-Road 9.2500e003 0.1831 0.2467 3.9000e- 004 8.6300e- 003 8.6300e- 003 8.6300e- 003 8.6300e- 003 34.2300 Total 9.2500e003 0.1831 0.2467 3.9000e- 004 1.0100e- 003 8.6300e- 003 9.6400e- 003 1.5000e- 004 8.6300e- 003 8.7800e- 003 34.2300 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 3.0000e005 1.9400e- 003 3.7000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 2.1000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 0.7406 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 4.8000e004 3.5000e- 004 3.9700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4500e- 003 3.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 1.1323 Total 5.1000e004 2.2900e- 003 4.3400e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.6400e- 003 3.0000e- 005 1.6600e- 003 4.3000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 4.6000e- 004 1.8729 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:57 PM Page 12 of 35 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0983 0.0000 0.0983 0.0505 0.0000 0.0505 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0133 0.1376 0.0912 1.9000e004 6.3300e- 003 6.3300e- 003 5.8200e- 003 5.8200e- 003 16.8606 Total 0.0133 0.1376 0.0912 1.9000e004 0.0983 6.3300e- 003 0.1046 0.0505 5.8200e- 003 0.0563 16.8606 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 2.9000e004 2.1000e- 004 2.3800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 8.7000e- 004 0.0000 8.7000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 0.0000 2.3000e- 004 0.6794 Total 2.9000e004 2.1000e- 004 2.3800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 8.7000e- 004 0.0000 8.7000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 0.0000 2.3000e- 004 0.6794 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:57 PM Page 13 of 35 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0383 0.0000 0.0383 0.0197 0.0000 0.0197 0.0000 Off-Road 4.6600e003 0.0953 0.1148 1.9000e- 004 4.7300e- 003 4.7300e- 003 4.7300e- 003 4.7300e- 003 16.8606 Total 4.6600e003 0.0953 0.1148 1.9000e- 004 0.0383 4.7300e- 003 0.0431 0.0197 4.7300e- 003 0.0244 16.8606 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 2.9000e004 2.1000e- 004 2.3800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 8.7000e- 004 0.0000 8.7000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 0.0000 2.3000e- 004 0.6794 Total 2.9000e004 2.1000e- 004 2.3800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 8.7000e- 004 0.0000 8.7000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 0.0000 2.3000e- 004 0.6794 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:57 PM Page 14 of 35 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1382 0.0000 0.1382 0.0548 0.0000 0.0548 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0498 0.5177 0.4208 9.3000e004 0.0214 0.0214 0.0197 0.0197 82.4642 Total 0.0498 0.5177 0.4208 9.3000e004 0.1382 0.0214 0.1596 0.0548 0.0197 0.0745 82.4642 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 2.5000e004 0.0160 3.0500e- 003 6.0000e- 005 1.6100e- 003 1.3000e- 004 1.7400e- 003 4.4000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 5.6000e- 004 6.0855 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 9.6000e004 7.0000e- 004 7.9400e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.8900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 2.9000e- 003 7.7000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 7.8000e- 004 2.2646 Total 1.2100e003 0.0167 0.0110 8.0000e- 005 4.5000e- 003 1.4000e- 004 4.6400e- 003 1.2100e- 003 1.3000e- 004 1.3400e- 003 8.3501 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:57 PM Page 15 of 35 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0539 0.0000 0.0539 0.0214 0.0000 0.0214 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0229 0.4497 0.5508 9.3000e004 0.0195 0.0195 0.0195 0.0195 82.4641 Total 0.0229 0.4497 0.5508 9.3000e004 0.0539 0.0195 0.0734 0.0214 0.0195 0.0409 82.4641 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 2.5000e004 0.0160 3.0500e- 003 6.0000e- 005 1.6100e- 003 1.3000e- 004 1.7400e- 003 4.4000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 5.6000e- 004 6.0855 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 9.6000e004 7.0000e- 004 7.9400e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.8900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 2.9000e- 003 7.7000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 7.8000e- 004 2.2646 Total 1.2100e003 0.0167 0.0110 8.0000e- 005 4.5000e- 003 1.4000e- 004 4.6400e- 003 1.2100e- 003 1.3000e- 004 1.3400e- 003 8.3501 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:57 PM Page 16 of 35 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0944 0.8631 0.9746 1.6200e003 0.0420 0.0420 0.0395 0.0395 139.9100 Total 0.0944 0.8631 0.9746 1.6200e003 0.0420 0.0420 0.0395 0.0395 139.9100 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 5.0600e003 0.1785 0.0573 6.4000e- 004 0.0196 1.0100e- 003 0.0207 5.6800e- 003 9.7000e- 004 6.6400e- 003 65.0900 Worker 0.0356 0.0259 0.2954 9.0000e004 0.1074 5.3000e- 004 0.1080 0.0286 4.9000e- 004 0.0290 84.2446 Total 0.0406 0.2044 0.3527 1.5400e003 0.1271 1.5400e- 003 0.1286 0.0342 1.4600e- 003 0.0357 149.3346 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:57 PM Page 17 of 35 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0404 0.8536 1.0724 1.6200e003 0.0542 0.0542 0.0542 0.0542 139.9098 Total 0.0404 0.8536 1.0724 1.6200e003 0.0542 0.0542 0.0542 0.0542 139.9098 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 5.0600e003 0.1785 0.0573 6.4000e- 004 0.0196 1.0100e- 003 0.0207 5.6800e- 003 9.7000e- 004 6.6400e- 003 65.0900 Worker 0.0356 0.0259 0.2954 9.0000e004 0.1074 5.3000e- 004 0.1080 0.0286 4.9000e- 004 0.0290 84.2446 Total 0.0406 0.2044 0.3527 1.5400e003 0.1271 1.5400e- 003 0.1286 0.0342 1.4600e- 003 0.0357 149.3346 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:57 PM Page 18 of 35 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0103 0.1019 0.1458 2.3000e004 5.1000e- 003 5.1000e- 003 4.6900e- 003 4.6900e- 003 20.1888 Paving 1.8900e003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0122 0.1019 0.1458 2.3000e004 5.1000e- 003 5.1000e- 003 4.6900e- 003 4.6900e- 003 20.1888 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 4.8000e004 3.5000e- 004 3.9700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4500e- 003 3.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 1.1323 Total 4.8000e004 3.5000e- 004 3.9700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4500e- 003 3.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 1.1323 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:57 PM Page 19 of 35 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 5.6100e003 0.1130 0.1730 2.3000e- 004 6.0900e- 003 6.0900e- 003 6.0900e- 003 6.0900e- 003 20.1888 Paving 1.8900e003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 7.5000e003 0.1130 0.1730 2.3000e- 004 6.0900e- 003 6.0900e- 003 6.0900e- 003 6.0900e- 003 20.1888 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 4.8000e004 3.5000e- 004 3.9700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4500e- 003 3.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 1.1323 Total 4.8000e004 3.5000e- 004 3.9700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4500e- 003 3.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 1.1323 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:57 PM Page 20 of 35 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.8898 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.9200e003 0.0130 0.0181 3.0000e- 005 7.1000e- 004 7.1000e- 004 7.1000e- 004 7.1000e- 004 2.5571 Total 0.8917 0.0130 0.0181 3.0000e005 7.1000e- 004 7.1000e- 004 7.1000e- 004 7.1000e- 004 2.5571 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 1.1800e003 8.6000e- 004 9.7900e- 003 3.0000e- 005 3.5600e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.5800e- 003 9.5000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 9.6000e- 004 2.7931 Total 1.1800e003 8.6000e- 004 9.7900e- 003 3.0000e- 005 3.5600e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.5800e- 003 9.5000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 9.6000e- 004 2.7931 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:57 PM Page 21 of 35 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.8898 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 5.9000e004 0.0136 0.0183 3.0000e- 005 9.5000e- 004 9.5000e- 004 9.5000e- 004 9.5000e- 004 2.5571 Total 0.8904 0.0136 0.0183 3.0000e005 9.5000e- 004 9.5000e- 004 9.5000e- 004 9.5000e- 004 2.5571 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 1.1800e003 8.6000e- 004 9.7900e- 003 3.0000e- 005 3.5600e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.5800e- 003 9.5000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 9.6000e- 004 2.7931 Total 1.1800e003 8.6000e- 004 9.7900e- 003 3.0000e- 005 3.5600e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.5800e- 003 9.5000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 9.6000e- 004 2.7931 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:57 PM Page 22 of 35 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.2228 1.5787 1.9877 7.7500e003 0.4840 0.0107 0.4946 0.1335 0.0102 0.1436 781.6150 Unmitigated 0.2228 1.5787 1.9877 7.7500e003 0.4840 0.0107 0.4946 0.1335 0.0102 0.1436 781.6150
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile4.2 Trip Summary Information4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 332.25 0.00 0.00 564,142 564,142 Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 314.42 314.42 0.00 640,631 640,631 Total 646.67 314.42 0.00 1,204,773 1,204,773
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Parking Lot 13.00 5.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
R il
7.00 7.00 7.00 59.00 0.00 41.00 92 5 3
Refrigerated Warehouse-No
R il
7.00 7.00 7.00 59.00 0.00 41.00 92 5 3
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:57 PM Page 23 of 35 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Parking Lot 0.516135 0.058853 0.199929 0.136792 0.029532 0.007795 0.008341 0.005917 0.000885 0.000346 0.029869 0.000792 0.004814 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail
0.304002 0.035433 0.127011 0.093089 0.038507 0.009459 0.175000 0.175000 0.000952 0.000366 0.033245 0.001002 0.006934 Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.304002 0.035433 0.127011 0.093089 0.038507 0.009459 0.175000 0.175000 0.000952 0.000366 0.033245 0.001002 0.006934
5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 232.8051
Electricity
Unmitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 232.8051
NaturalGas
Mitigated
7.3500e003 0.0668 0.0561 4.0000e- 004 5.0800e- 003 5.0800e- 003 5.0800e- 003 5.0800e- 003 73.1906 NaturalGasUnmitigated
7.3500e003 0.0668 0.0561 4.0000e- 004 5.0800e- 003 5.0800e- 003 5.0800e- 003 5.0800e- 003 73.1906 Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:57 PM Page 24 of 35 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
695032 3.7500e003 0.0341 0.0286 2.0000e- 004 2.5900e- 003 2.5900e- 003 2.5900e- 003 2.5900e- 003 37.3100 Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
668406 3.6000e003 0.0328 0.0275 2.0000e- 004 2.4900e- 003 2.4900e- 003 2.4900e- 003 2.4900e- 003 35.8806 Total 7.3500e003 0.0668 0.0561 4.0000e- 004 5.0800e- 003 5.0800e- 003 5.0800e- 003 5.0800e- 003 73.1906 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:57 PM Page 25 of 35 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
695032 3.7500e003 0.0341 0.0286 2.0000e- 004 2.5900e- 003 2.5900e- 003 2.5900e- 003 2.5900e- 003 37.3100 Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
668406 3.6000e003 0.0328 0.0275 2.0000e- 004 2.4900e- 003 2.4900e- 003 2.4900e- 003 2.4900e- 003 35.8806 Total 7.3500e003 0.0668 0.0561 4.0000e- 004 5.0800e- 003 5.0800e- 003 5.0800e- 003 5.0800e- 003 73.1906 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:57 PM Page 26 of 35 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Parking Lot 22400 2.0930
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
1.78906e
+006
167.1678
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
680064 63.5443
Total 232.8051
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:57 PM Page 27 of 35 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
6.0 Area Detail6.1 Mitigation Measures AreaUse Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential InteriorUse Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential ExteriorUse Low VOC Cleaning Supplies Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Parking Lot 22400 2.0930
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
1.78906e
+006
167.1678
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
680064 63.5443
Total 232.8051
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:57 PM Page 28 of 35 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 1.8110 8.0000e005 9.0200e- 003 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 0.0188 Unmitigated 1.9215 8.0000e005 9.0200e- 003 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 0.0188
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.4396 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
1.4811 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 8.3000e004 8.0000e- 005 9.0200e- 003 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 0.0188 Total 1.9215 8.0000e005 9.0200e- 003 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 0.0188 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:57 PM Page 29 of 35 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
6.2 Area by SubCategory
7.0 Water Detail7.1 Mitigation Measures WaterInstall Low Flow Bathroom FaucetInstall Low Flow Kitchen FaucetInstall Low Flow ToiletInstall Low Flow ShowerUse Water Efficient Irrigation System ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.4396 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
1.3707 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 8.3000e004 8.0000e- 005 9.0200e- 003 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 0.0188 Total 1.8111 8.0000e005 9.0200e- 003 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 0.0188 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:57 PM Page 30 of 35 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 130.6011
Unmitigated 163.2514
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
42.5199 /
0 79.3744
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
44.9319 /
0 83.8769
Total 163.2514
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:57 PM Page 31 of 35 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
34.0159 /
0 63.4995
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
35.9455 /
0 67.1016
Total 130.6011
Mitigated
8.0 Waste Detail8.1 Mitigation Measures WasteInstitute Recycling and Composting Services CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:57 PM Page 32 of 35 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 89.3857
Unmitigated 178.7714
Category/Year8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Parking Lot 0 0.0000
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
172.84 86.9215
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
182.64 91.8499
Total 178.7714
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:57 PM Page 33 of 35 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Parking Lot 0 0.0000
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
86.42 43.4608
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
91.32 45.9250
Total 89.3857
Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:57 PM Page 34 of 35 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
11.0 Vegetation
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/15/2022 3:57 PM Page 35 of 35 Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project - San Luis Obispo County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment 6
TRIP GENERATION/VMT SUMMARY
WAREHOUSE SQ FT
SF/EMPLOYEE
(ITE)
NUMER OF
EMPLOYEES
AVG DAILY
TRIPS
TRIP
RATE/KSF
AVG DAILY
TRIPS
TRIP
RATE/KSF
AVG DAILY
TRIPS
TRIP
RATE/KSF
STRAVINSKI 194304 781 249 116 0.597 216 1.112 332 1.71DAOU 183871 781 235 110 0.598 204 1.109 314 1.71TOTAL 378175 781 484 226 0.598 420 1.111 646 1.71 Does not include PCE. Based on information derived from the traffic analysis prepared for this project.Employee estimates based on ITE average rates/square foot of floor area.
MILES/TRIP DAILY TRIPS %TRIPS
TOTAL
DAILY
MILES
EMPLOYEE 3.7 420 0.65 1553.63TRUCK 13 226 0.35 2939.3TOTAL 646 4492.93AVG TOTAL MILES/TRIP: 7.0 Based on model defaults and data derived from the traffic analysis prepared for this project.
AVERAGE-DAILY VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION RATES ESTIMATED EMPLOYEES WAREHOUSE PROJECT
TOTAL (ALL VEHICLES) PASSENGER VEHICLES TRUCKS
Attachment 6
FLEET MIX ADJUSTMENT
LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH CalEEMod Default Fleet Mix 0.486418 0.056693 0.203223 0.148945 0.038507 0.009459 0.00826 0.005996 0.000952 0.000366 0.033245 0.001002 0.006934Adjusted Fleet Mix 0.304002 0.035433 0.127011 0.093089 0.038507 0.009459 0.175 0.175 0.000952 0.000366 0.033245 0.001002 0.006934 Project truck fleet mix assumes total of 35% distributed equally among MHDT and HHDT vehicle categories based on the traffic anlaysis prepared for this project. Employee trips assumes predominantly light-duty vehicles (defined by ARB as LDA, LDT1, LDT2, MDV) adjusted equally to account for increased truck fleet mix. All other vehicle categories based on CalEEMod defaults. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2021-01/EMFAC202x_Users_Guide_01112021_final.pdf Attachment 6
DAILY CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS
ROG NOX ROG+NOX FUG PM10 EXH PM10 TOT PM10
DEMOLITION
ONSITE 2.27 21.48 23.75 0.26 1.00 1.26
OFFSITE 0.06 0.23 0.29 0.17 0.00 0.17
TOTAL 2.33 21.71 24.04 0.43 1.00 1.43
SITE PREP
ONSITE 2.66 27.52 30.18 19.66 1.27 20.92
OFFSITE 0.06 0.04 0.10 0.18 0.00 0.18
TOTAL 2.72 27.56 30.28 19.84 1.27 21.10
GRADING
ONSITE 3.32 34.52 37.84 9.21 1.42 10.64
OFFSITE 0.09 1.10 1.19 0.31 0.01 0.32
TOTAL 3.41 35.62 39.03 9.52 1.43 10.96
BLDG CONST
ONSITE 1.57 14.39 15.96 0.00 0.70 0.70
OFFSITE 0.73 3.42 4.15 2.17 0.03 2.19
TOTAL 2.30 17.81 20.11 2.17 0.73 2.89
PAVING
ONSITE 1.22 10.19 11.41 0.00 0.51 0.51
OFFSITE 0.05 0.04 0.09 0.15 0.00 0.15
TOTAL 1.27 10.23 11.50 0.15 0.51 0.66
ARCH COATING
ONSITE 89.17 1.30 90.47 0.00 0.07 0.07
OFFSITE 0.13 0.09 0.22 0.37 0.00 0.37
TOTAL 89.30 1.39 90.69 0.37 0.07 0.44
BLDG CONST/PAVING/ARCH COATING: 92.87 29.43 122.30 2.69 1.31 3.99 MAX DAILY: 92.87 35.62 122.30 19.84 1.43 21.10
Based on the highest calculated daily emissions for either winter or summer conditions. Totals may not sum due to rounding.
Max daily emissions assumes that building construction, paving, and arch coating application could occur simultaneously.
EMISSIONS WITHOUT MITIGATION
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
DAILY CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS
ROG NOX ROG+NOX FUG PM10 EXH PM10 TOT PM10
DEMOLITION
ONSITE 0.93 18.31 19.24 0.10 0.86 0.96
OFFSITE 0.06 0.23 0.29 0.17 0.00 0.17
TOTAL 0.99 18.54 19.53 0.27 0.86 1.13
SITE PREP
ONSITE 0.93 19.07 20.00 7.67 0.95 8.61
OFFSITE 0.06 0.04 0.10 0.18 0.00 0.18
TOTAL 0.99 19.11 20.10 7.85 0.95 8.79
GRADING
ONSITE 1.52 29.98 31.50 3.59 1.30 4.89
OFFSITE 0.09 1.10 1.19 0.31 0.01 0.32
TOTAL 1.61 31.08 32.69 3.90 1.31 5.21
BLDG CONST
ONSITE 0.67 14.23 14.90 0.00 0.90 0.90
OFFSITE 0.73 3.42 4.15 2.17 0.03 2.19
TOTAL 1.40 17.65 19.05 2.17 0.93 3.09
PAVING
ONSITE 0.75 11.30 12.05 0.00 0.61 0.61
OFFSITE 0.05 0.04 0.09 0.15 0.00 0.15
TOTAL 0.80 11.34 12.14 0.15 0.61 0.76
ARCH COATING
ONSITE 89.04 1.36 90.40 0.00 0.10 0.10
OFFSITE 0.13 0.09 0.22 0.37 0.00 0.37
TOTAL 89.17 1.45 90.62 0.37 0.10 0.47
BLDG CONST/PAVING/ARCH COATING: 91.37 30.44 121.81 2.69 1.64 4.32 MAX DAILY: 91.37 31.08 121.81 7.85 0.95 8.79
Based on the highest calculated daily emissions for either winter or summer conditions. Totals may not sum due to rounding.
Max daily emissions assumes that building construction, paving, and arch coating application could occur simultaneously.
EMISSIONS WITH MITIGATION
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
WINE FERMENTATION AND OAK BARREL AGING/STORAGE EMISSION CALCUATIONS Winery Name: Proposed Daou Warehouse
Contact Name & Email:
Permit Number (If known):
Value
583,950
583,950
583,950
583,950
0 0
0 0 1. Please input combined values for both tank and oak barrel ferementation Value
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Value
2,335,800
0 0
0 3.00%
Value
6.2 27.83
2.5 25.83
1. PTE from fermentation and aging/storage reflects the emissions from the total highest emitting quarter.
Permit Application
4th Quarter White Wine Storage/Aging (barrels) Permit Application 3rd Quarter Red Wine Storage/Aging(barrels)
White Wine Aging/Storage (lb/1000 gal-yr) Calculated Value Total 39.35 7.24
Red Wine Aging/Storage
White Wine Aging/Storage
lb/day
39.35 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Wine Fermentation & Oak Barrel Aging/Storage VOC Potential To Emit1 Information
Red Wine Fermentation
White Wine Fermentation
tons/year
7.24 0.00
White Wine Fermentation (lb/1000 gal) CARB March 2005
Emission Factors
Information Reference
Red Wine Fermentation (lb/1000 gal) CARB March 2005
Red Wine Aging/Storage (lb/1000 gal-yr) Calculated Value Calculated Value
Annual Wine Inputs & Properties
Reference
Permit Application
4th Quarter Red Wine Storage/Aging (barrels) Permit Application Permit Application
Permit Application
2nd Quarter Red Wine Fermentation (gal)
3rd Quarter Red Wine Fermentation (gal)
4th Quarter Red Wine Fermentation (gal)
1st Quarter White Wine Fermentation (gal)
2nd Quarter White Wine Fermentation (gal)
Permit Application
1st Quarter Red Wine Storage/Aging (barrels) Permit Application 2nd Quarter Red Wine Storage/Aging (barrels) Permit Application Permit Application
Permit Application
1st Quarter White Wine Storage/Aging (barrels)
2nd Quarter White Wine Storage/Aging (barrels)
3rd Quarter White Wine Storage/Aging (barrels)
Quarterly Wine Fermentation Inputs
Information1 Reference
MBARD Default/ Permit Application
Permit Application
Permit Application
Calculated Value
Percent Wine Loss by Volume (gal/gal-wine)
White Wine Barrel Storage (barrel/yr)
Red Wine Barrel Storage (barrel/yr)
White Wine Production (gal/yr)
Red Wine Production (gal/yr)
Information
1st Quarter Red Wine Fermentation (gal) Permit Application 3rd Quarter White Wine Fermentation (gal) Permit Application 4th Quarter White Wine Fermentation (gal) Permit Application Permit Application
Permit Application
Information Reference
Quarterly Wine Storage/Aging Inputs (Units In # Of Physical Barrels Stored) D:\Paso Robles Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project\DRAFT 111622\Copy of Dauo Winery Emissions Calc based on MBARD 111522 Attachment 5
Attachment 6
WINE FERMENTATION AND OAK BARREL AGING/STORAGE EMISSION CALCUATIONS Winery Name: Proposed Daou Warehouse
Contact Name & Email: 0
Permit Number (If known): 0
Value Reference
59 0.79
8.34 6.59
14.00%
13.00%
11.40%
10.56%
8.14 8.16
Process
Fermentation Red
Daily VOC (lb/day)
Fermentation White
Daily VOC (lb/day)
Process
Red Storage
Daily VOC (lb/day)
White Storage
Daily VOC (lb/day)
Total 40.23 39.79 39.35 39.35
Process 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Fermentation Red 40.23 39.79 39.35 39.35
Fermentation White 00 0 0
Red Storage 00 0 0
White Storage 00 0 0
40.23 1st Quarter
Wine Properties
Calculated Value
Standard
MSDS
Standard/ Permit Application
1st Quarter
3620.49
40.23 0
0 0
0 39.79
3620.49
2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter
3620.49
39.35 0
0 0
0 39.35
3620.49
4th Quarter
MBARD Default/Permit Application
MBARD Default/Permit Application
Calculated Value
Calculated Value
Calculated Value
Calculated Value
Total Quarterly Wine Fermentation & Storage Emissions (lb/day) Total Quarterly Maximum Emissions
Which Quarter Has The Maximum Emissions?
Barrel Conversion Factor (gal/yr)
Specific Gravity of Ethanol
Density of Water (lb/gal)
Density of Ethanol (lb/gal)
Red Wine Ethanol Volume Percent (gal/gal-wine)
White Wine Ethanol Volume Percent (gal/gal-wine)
Red Wine Ethanol Weight Percent (lb/lb-wine)
White Wine Ethanol Weight Perent (lb/lb-wine)
Red Wine Density (lb/gal)
White Wine Density (lb/gal)
Quarterly Fermentation Emissions
1st Quarter
0 0
0 0
2nd Quarter
0 0
0 Quarter Barrel Emissions
Information
3rd Quarter
0 0
4th Quarter
0 0
0 0 0
0 0
D:\Paso Robles Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project\DRAFT 111622\Copy of Dauo Winery Emissions Calc based on MBARD 111522 Attachment 5
Attachment 6
ETHANOL EMISSIONS FROM WASTEWATER PONDS
Winery Name: Proposed Daou Warehouse
Contact Name & Email: 0
Permit Number (If known): GNR-017XXX
Value
3,596,000
80 285
2,086
608
3%
Value
0.23 2.328E-04
Wastewater Inputs
Information Reference
Wastewater Throughput (gal/yr) Permit Application
Crushing Season (days/yr) MBARD Default/ Permit Application MBARD Default/ Permit Application
Wastewater 2.29 0.42
Daily Ethanol (lb-ethanol/gal) Calculated Value
MBARD Default/ Permit Application
Non-Crushing Season (days/yr)
Ethanol Emissions From Wastewater Ponds
Information lb/day tons/year
Ethanol Concentration - Crush (mg/L) MBARD Default/ Permit Application Emission Factors
Information Reference
Annual Ethanol (lb-ethanol/ 1000 gal-yr) Calculated Value Ethanol Concentration - Non-Crush (mg/L) MBARD Default/ Permit Application Evaporation Loss Percentage
(gal-ww evap/gal-ww processed)
D:\Paso Robles Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project\DRAFT 111622\Copy of Dauo Winery Emissions Calc based on MBARD 111522 Attachment 5
Attachment 6
ETHANOL EMISSIONS FROM WASTEWATER PONDS
Winery Name: Proposed Daou Warehouse
Contact Name & Email: 0
Permit Number (If known): GNR-017XXX
Value
56%
932.00
454
1000
3.78 Standard
Standard
Standard
Wastewater Properties
Reference
Gram Conversion Factor (g/lb)
Milligram Conversion Factor (mg/g)
Liter Conversion Factor (L/gal)
Standard
Calculated Value
Information
Ethanol-C/TOC
Annual Average Ethanol Concentration (mg/L)
D:\Paso Robles Stravinski-Daou Warehouses Project\DRAFT 111622\Copy of Dauo Winery Emissions Calc based on MBARD 111522 Attachment 5
Attachment 6
WINE FERMENTATION CO2 EMISSIONS
PROJECT:
lb CO2/1K g: 6303xVF EtOH
VF: Volume fraction of Ethanol in the produced wine (g ethanol/g wine) Red: 0.14
White: 0.13
lbs CO2/1K g Red Wine: 882
lbs CO2/1K g White Wine: 819
Source: SBCAPCD Winery Spreadsheet for VOC calculations (www.sbcapcd.org/eng/winery/winery.htm) Annual Production Red Wine: 2,336 k gal
Annual Production White Wine: 0 k gal
Red Wine Annual CO2 Emissions: 934
White Wine Annual Emissions (MTCO2e): 0
Total Annual Emissions (MTCO2e): 934
DAOU WAREHOUSE - WINERY PRODUCTION
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
BAU
2005 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 POPULATION 32,300 32,840 33,380 33,920 34,460 35,000 35,540 36,080 36,620 37,160 37,700 38,040 38,380 38,720 39,060 EMPLOYMENT 15,071 15,115 15,159 15,203 15,247 15,291 15,300 15,380 15,459 15,539 15,619 15,698 15,778 15,858 15,937 16,017 15,977 15,736 15,875 15,624 SERVICE POPULATION 47,591 48,140 48,760 49,379 49,999 50,619 51,238 51,858 52,478 53,097 53,717 54,017 54,116 54,595 54,684
0.47 0.47 0.46 0.46 0.45 0.45 0.44 0.44 0.43 0.43 0.42 0.42 0.41 0.41 0.40
GHG EMISSIONS INVENTORY
LAND USE SECTOR (TOTAL): 168,233 143,030 138,821 134,612 130,403 126,194 121,985 117,776 113,567 109,358 105,149 100,940 97575 94210 90846 87481 PERCENT REDUCTION -15% -40%
GHG EFFICIENCY THRESHOLD 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.6 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 POPULATION 39,400 39,740 40,080 40,420 40,760 41,100 41,440 41,780 42,120 42,460 42,800 43,140 43,480 43,820 44,160 44,500EMPLOYMENT 15,760 15,499 15,631 15,360 15,489 15,207 15,333 15,041 15,163 14,861 14,980 14,668 14,783 14,461 14,573 14,240SERVICE POPULATION 55,160 55,239 55,711 55,780 56,249 56,307 56,773 56,821 57,283 57,321 57,780 57,808 58,263 58,281 58,733 58,740
0.40 0.39 0.39 0.38 0.38 0.37 0.37 0.36 0.36 0.35 0.35 0.34 0.34 0.33 0.33 0.32
GHG EMISSIONS INVENTORY
LAND USE SECTOR (TOTAL): 84117 80752 77387 74023 70658 67293 63929 60564 57199 53835 50470 47105 43741 40376 37011 33647 PERCENT REDUCTION Target Reduction Below 1990 level: -80% GHG EFFICIENCY THRESHOLD 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 Based on business-as-usual (year 2005) and year 2020 emissions inventory and the State's target GHG reductions of 40 percent below BAU baseline GHG emissions inventory by 2030 and 80% by 2050. Emissions inventory reflects locally appropriate emission sectors; excludes emission sectors that do not apply to standard development (e.g., agriculture).
YEAR
Service population represents total employment and population for the City. Interim years are based on a linear extrapolation.
YEAR
Attachment 6
CARBON OFFSET CALCULATION
TOTAL BOTH WAREHOUSES
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 AMORTIZED CONSTRUCTION 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18ENERGY 505 437 352 264 178 93 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0MOBILE 876 860 845 829 813 798 782 764 746 728 709 691 673 655 637 619 600 582 564 546 528 510 491 473 455WASTE 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 87 85 82 80 78 76 74 71 69 67 65 63 60 58 56 54 52 49WATER 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131TOTAL 1619 1536 1434 1331 1230 1129 1027 1000 979 959 939 918 898 877 857 837 816 796 776 755 735 715 694 674 653CO2e/SP 3.3 3.2 3.0 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4THRESHOLD 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 2 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7CARBON OFFSET REQUIRED 360 374 321 266 213 161 108 141 156 136 164 192 172 200 228 208 236 264 243 271 299 279 307 287 315 LIFETIME CARBON OFFSETS (MTCO2e):
STRAVINSKI WINERY WAREHOUSE (REFRIGERATED)AMORTIZED CONSTRUCTION 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9ENERGY 364.3 315.9 254.2 190.5 128.8 67.1 5.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0MOBILE 450.3 442.2 434.2 426.1 418.1 410.0 401.9 392.6 383.3 373.9 364.6 355.3 345.9 336.6 327.2 317.9 308.6 299.2 289.9 280.6 271.2 261.9 252.5 243.2 233.9WASTE 45.7 45.7 45.7 45.7 45.7 45.7 45.7 44.6 43.5 42.4 41.2 40.1 39.0 37.8 36.7 35.6 34.4 33.3 32.2 31.0 29.9 28.8 27.7 26.5 25.4WATER 67.3 67.3 67.3 67.3 67.3 67.3 67.3 67.3 67.3 67.3 67.3 67.3 67.3 67.3 67.3 67.3 67.3 67.3 67.3 67.3 67.3 67.3 67.3 67.3 67.3TOTAL 936.6 880.1 810.4 738.7 668.9 599.2 529.5 513.6 503.1 492.6 482.2 471.7 461.2 450.7 440.3 429.8 419.3 408.9 398.4 387.9 377.5 367.0 356.5 346.1 335.6CO2e/SP 4.0 3.7 3.4 3.1 2.8 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.4THRESHOLD 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 2 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 1 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7CARBON OFFSET REQUIRED 326 316 270 222 175 129 83 97 104 93 106 119 109 122 135 124 137 150 140 153 166 156 169 158 171 LIFETIME CARBON OFFSETS (MTCO2e):
ESTIMATED $/MT:
ESTIMATED TOTAL OFFSET COST:
DAOU WAREHOUSE (UNREFRIGERATED)AMORTIZED CONSTRUCTION 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9ENERGY 140.0 121.3 97.6 73.1 49.5 25.8 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0MOBILE 425.7 418.1 410.5 402.9 395.3 387.7 380.1 371.2 362.4 353.6 344.7 335.9 327.1 318.2 309.4 300.6 291.8 282.9 274.1 265.3 256.4 247.6 238.8 230.0 221.1WASTE 43.3 43.3 43.3 43.3 43.3 43.3 43.3 42.2 41.1 40.0 39.0 37.9 36.8 35.8 34.7 33.6 32.6 31.5 30.4 29.4 28.3 27.2 26.1 25.1 24.0WATER 63.7 63.7 63.7 63.7 63.7 63.7 63.7 63.7 63.7 63.7 63.7 63.7 63.7 63.7 63.7 63.7 63.7 63.7 63.7 63.7 63.7 63.7 63.7 63.7 63.7TOTAL 681.6 655.3 624.0 592.0 560.7 529.4 498.1 486.1 476.2 466.3 456.4 446.5 436.6 426.7 416.8 406.9 397.0 387.1 377.2 367.3 357.4 347.5 337.6 327.7 317.8CO2e/SP 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.1 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3THRESHOLD 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7CARBON OFFSET REQUIRED 34 58 51 44 38 31 25 45 53 43 58 73 63 78 93 83 98 113 103 118 133 123 138 129 144 LIFETIME CARBON OFFSETS (MTCO2e):
ESTIMATED $/MT:
ESTIMATED TOTAL OFFSET COST:
1,970
$20
$39,407
3,929
$20
$78,582
SOURCE
OPERATIONAL YEAR
5899
Attachment 6
ELECTRICITY USE GHG EMISSIONS
Yr EF (lbs/MWh) kWh/yr MWh/yr LBS CO2 MTCO2e
2024 446.53 2491524 2491.524 1112540.21 504.63934
2025 386.83 2491524 2491.524 963796.229 437.170259
2026 311.3 2491524 2491.524 775611.421 351.811136
2027 233.28 2491524 2491.524 581222.719 263.637975
2028 157.75 2491524 2491.524 393037.911 178.278852
2029 82.18 2491524 2491.524 204753.442 92.8745234
2030 6.63 2491524 2491.524 16518.8041 7.4927974
3CE Emission Factors
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
CPUC WBE# 14080030
PO Box 1646
Templeton, CA 93465
805.434.2804
fax 805.242.0346
www.sageii.com
STRAVINSKI-DAOU PROJECT
5175 AIRPORT ROAD
PASO ROBLES, CA 93446
(APN: 025-434-002)
REVISED BIOLOGICAL
RESOURCES ASSESSMENT
December 17, 2022
Prepared for:
DAOU VINEYARDS AND WINERY
&
STRAVINSKI DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC
Attachment 6
Attachment 6
STRAVINSKI-DAOU PROJECT – 5175 AIRPORT ROAD, PASO ROBLES CA REVISED BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, DEC. 2022 (APN:025-434-002) i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE ............................................................................................................................. 1
2.0 METHODS ....................................................................................................................................................... 1
3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ........................................................................................................................................ 2
4.0 RESULTS .......................................................................................................................................................... 2
4.1 HABITAT TYPES AND PLANT COMMUNITIES ............................................................................................................ 2
4.1.1 CROPLAND/FALLOW AGRICULTURAL LAND .................................................................................................. 3
4.1.2 DEVELOPED ........................................................................................................................................... 3
4.2 WILDLIFE ........................................................................................................................................................ 3
4.3 WATERS OF THE U.S., WETLANDS, AND WATERS OF THE STATE ................................................................................ 3
4.4 SPECIAL-STATUS SPECIES AND NATURAL COMMUNITIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN ............................................................. 3
4.4.1 SPECIAL-STATUS BOTANICAL RESOURCES..................................................................................................... 4
4.4.2 SPECIAL-STATUS WILDLIFE ........................................................................................................................ 4
4.4.3 SAN JOAQUIN KIT FOX HABITAT EVALUATION ............................................................................................... 5
5.0 IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES ............................................................................ 6
5.1 IMPACT ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................................................................ 6
5.2 RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES .............................................................................................................. 8
6.0 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................................................ 11
7.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................................... 12 APPENDIX A – FIGURES
FIGURE 1: VICINITY LOCATION MAP
FIGURE 2: HABITAT MAP
FIGURE 3: CNDDB PLANT SPECIES OCCURRENCES MAP (10-MILE SEARCH RADIUS) FIGURE 4: CNDDB WILDLIFE SPECIES OCCURRENCES MAP (10-MILE SEARCH RADIUS) FIGURE 5: CNDDB SAN JOAQUIN KIT FOX OCCURRENCES MAP (10-MILE SEARCH RADIUS) FIGURE 6: REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPHS
APPENDIX B – TABLES
TABLE B-1: CNDDB SPECIAL-STATUS SPECIES OCCURRENCE LIST (10-MILE SEARCH RADIUS) APPENDIX C – SJKF HABITAT EVALUATION FORM
Attachment 6
Attachment 6
STRAVINSKI-DAOU PROJECT – 5175 AIRPORT ROAD, PASO ROBLES CA REVISED BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, DEC. 2022 (APN:025-434-002) 1
STRAVINSKI-DAOU PROJECT
REVISED BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
At the request of Daou Vineyards and the Stravinski Development Group, LLC, Sage Institute Inc. (SII) conducted a field survey in December 2022 to verify site conditions and prepared this Revised Biological Assessment (Revised BRA) for the currently proposed Stravinski-Daou Project (project). SII previously prepared a January 8, 2020, Daou Campus Project Biological Assessment (SII 2020) that provided a detailed biological resources analysis for the project site that is hereby incorporated by reference into this Revised BA. The purpose of this Revised BRA is to document current conditions of the proposed project site and to update the evaluation for any direct or indirect significant impacts on biological or wetland resources, or adverse effects on any rare, threatened, or endangered plant or wildlife species (special-status species).
The updated project description consists of subdividing an approximately 19.75-acre property into two (2) parcels, roughly equal in size at 9.87-acres each. Phase 1 proposes to construct an approximately 196,000 square foot warehouse building. The building will be used as refrigerated wine storage, distribution and fulfillment center. There will not be any public tasting rooms, event centers, retail operations nor any other use that would be open to the public on the project site. Phase 2 proposes to construct an approximately 157,000 square foot wine production facility. The interior uses include barrel storage, bottling/packages areas, warehousing, and fermentation areas. The exterior uses include a crush pad, mechanical yards, and wastewater treatment.
The approximately 20-acre project site is located at 5175 Airport Road across from the Paso Robles Airport in the City of Paso Robles (APN: 025-434-002). Access to the project site will be from Airport Road. The site has a residence and several barns, and has been actively cultivated going back to at least 1977 as shown on the soils survey map and available aerial photography back to 1994. Several clusters of valley oaks (Quercus lobata) and non-native trees are around the existing structures and Airport Road. The project site is surrounded by agricultural, commercial, and industrial uses. Figure 1 in Appendix A provides a regional and vicinity location map. The proposed project (Phase 1 and Phase 2) would develop the entire approximate 20-acre site in facilities as described above.
2.0 METHODS
Prior to field surveys SII biologists conducted a review of available background information including aerial photography of the project area (Google Earth), the Soil Survey (Natural Resources Conservation Service), and the 10-mile radius query results of the California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB 2022). The CNDDB provided a list and mapped locations of special-status plant and wildlife species, and natural communities of special concern, that have been recorded in the region of the project site. The CNDDB records help to focus the field survey efforts and evaluation of potential project effects on specific species or habitats. It is noted that the CNDDB does not necessarily include all potential specialstatus species potentially occurring onsite or in the region, but rather only those that have been recorded by the CNDDB.
Attachment 6
Attachment 6
STRAVINSKI-DAOU PROJECT – 5175 AIRPORT ROAD, PASO ROBLES CA REVISED BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, DEC. 2022 (APN:025-434-002) 2 SII Principal Ecologist David Wolff conducted a field reconnaissance survey of the site on November 14, 2019, and SII Principal Biologist Jason Kirschenstein conducted a subsequent reconnaissance survey of the site on December 12, 2022. The surveys were conducted by walking the entirety of the proposed project site recording plant and wildlife species observed and general site characteristics. The site survey was conducive to the purpose of documenting plant and wildlife to establish existing conditions. The purpose of the field surveys was to document existing conditions in terms of habitat for plant and wildlife species, suitability for special-status species, the potential to support wetland and/or riparian habitats, and/or waters of the U.S./State. The study area habitat types were described by the aggregation of plants and wildlife based on the composition and structure of the dominant vegetation observed at the time the field reconnaissance was conducted. The survey data collected on plant and wildlife species and conclusions presented in this biological and wetland assessment are based on the methods and field reconnaissance conducted over the project site as described above.
3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS
The proposed project site is surrounded on all sides by a variety of commercial, industrial, and agricultural uses. The Paso Robles Airport and related businesses are to the east of the site across Airport Road. Review of available aerial photography shows that the project site has been in active cultivation with alfalfa and dryland farming, and appurtenant structures, going back to at least 1977.
Observations during the field surveys showed the grassland to be mostly fallow, although evidence of prior disking was evident on the southern half of the site. Fallow grassland areas are dominated by ruderal non-native herbaceous annual plant species. There is one large valley oak and a cluster of valley oaks around the existing developed area structures, and one valley oak along Airport Road. No drainage features, riparian habitat, or wetlands were observed during SII field surveys or are evidenced by review of available aerial photography.
The USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS; Soil Conservation Service, 1977) has identified two soil series mapping units within the project site. Onsite soils are mapped as Arbuckle-San Ysidro Complex (106), 2 to 9 percent slopes, and San Ysidro Loam (197), 0 to 2 percent slopes. The Arbuckle soil is a very deep, well drained soil with moderately low permeability formed in alluvium from mixed rocks.
Typically, the surface layer is pale brown fine sandy loam to 10 inches thick. The San Ysidro soil is a very deep, moderately well drained soil with very slow permeability formed in alluvium from mixed rocks.
Typically, the surface layer is pale brown loam about 20 inches thick. Field observations of the surface soils affirmed loamy and sandy loam soils throughout the project site.
4.0 RESULTS
4.1 HABITAT TYPES AND PLANT COMMUNITIES
Natural/native plant communities are generally described by the assemblages of plant species that occur together in the same area forming habitat types and alliance used in this report follow A manual of California vegetation, 2nd edition (Sawyer et al. 2009). However, the “manual” does not include any agricultural alliances. The Wildlife Habitat Relationship System (WHR) provides a “Cropland” habitat type described in, A Guide to Wildlife Habitats of California (Laudenslayer et. al 1988) that is most appropriate classification for this project site. Plant names used in this report follow The Jepson Manual, Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition Thoroughly Revised and Expanded (Baldwin et al. 2012). The proposed project site supports developed, and agricultural land and fallow agricultural/ruderal (disturbed) land dominated with non-native plant species. Figure 2 in Appendix A provides a habitat map Attachment 6
Attachment 6
STRAVINSKI-DAOU PROJECT – 5175 AIRPORT ROAD, PASO ROBLES CA REVISED BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, DEC. 2022 (APN:025-434-002) 3 showing the location and extent of habitat types on the proposed project site. Figure 6 includes a set of representative photographs of the site taken in December 2022.
4.1.1 CROPLAND/FALLOW AGRICULTURAL LAND
The fallow agricultural land on the site supports a mix of ruderal non-native plants dominated by oats (Avena sp.) and short-pod mustard (Hirschfeldia incana). The fallow land still had evidence of furrows from tilling and was observed to be relatively low in plant species diversity with ripgut brome (Bromus diandrus), prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola), heliotrope (Heliotropium curassavicum), tumbleweed (Salsola tragus), vinegar weed (Trichostema lanceolatum), turkeymullein (Croton setiger), prostrate knotweed (Polygonum aviculare), and wheat (Triticum aestivum). Native spikeweed (Centromadia fitchii) was scattered amongst the non-native ruderal plants. The above constitutes the entire plant species observed during the SII field survey.
4.1.2 DEVELOPED
The northeast corner of the project site is developed land with a residence, several barn/farm structures, along with compacted roads and parking/storage areas lacking vegetation. One large valley oak is located on the west side of the residence, with a cluster of valley oaks in the middle of the developed area. A large cedar tree is on the east side of the residence. Landscaping shrubs are scattered around the buildings.
4.2 WILDLIFE
The cropland, fallow cropland and developed areas, with the surrounding urbanized land uses around the project site provides minimal quality habitat for wildlife species because of the regular tilling and disturbance. Depending on the type and cycle of plant cultivation, and season of the year, common bird species such as sparrows, blackbirds, and European starlings likely frequent the area. Gopher burrows were observed in the fallow areas. No California ground squirrels were observed but may also occupy the site depending on the frequency of cultivation activities. Given that the site is surrounded by the airport and a variety of developed urban uses, other wildlife use is likely limited to locally common skunks, raccoons, opossum, and coyote. Generally low wildlife values can be attributed to this site. As such, the project site does not represent a substantial movement corridor for wildlife.
4.3 WATERS OF THE U.S., WETLANDS, AND WATERS OF THE STATE The thorough field surveys affording 100 percent visual inspection of the entire project site resulted in no observations of wetlands, drainages, or riparian habitat on or adjacent to the project site. As such, there are no jurisdictional waters of the U.S./State on the project site.
4.4 SPECIAL-STATUS SPECIES AND NATURAL COMMUNITIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN Special-status species are those plants and animals listed, proposed for listing, or candidates for listing as threatened or endangered by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) or the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) under the federal Endangered Species Act (FESA); those considered “species of concern” by the USFWS; those listed or proposed for listing as rare, threatened, or endangered by the CDFW under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA); animals designated as “Species of Special Concern” by the CDFW; and plants occurring on lists 1B, 2, and 4 of the CNPS Attachment 6
Attachment 6
STRAVINSKI-DAOU PROJECT – 5175 AIRPORT ROAD, PASO ROBLES CA REVISED BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, DEC. 2022 (APN:025-434-002) 4 Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California. Natural Communities of Special Concern are habitat types considered rare and worthy of tracking in the CNDDB by the CNPS and CDFW because of their limited distribution or historic loss over time.
The updated December 2022 search and review of the CNDDB revealed the same 35 special-status species that were identified in the 2020 BA. These 35 species are composed of 16 special-status plants, 19 special-status wildlife species, and one natural community of special concern (valley oak woodland) with recorded occurrences in the 10-mile search radius of the proposed project site. The valley oak trees in the developed areas do not constitute a Valley Oak Woodland habitat. The following briefly describes or summarizes the special-status species issues and potential for occurrence on the project site. Table B1 in Appendix B provides a list of special-status species recorded in the 10-mile CNDDB query and includes scientific and common names, listing status, and habitat requirements. Common names are used in text for ease of reading (see Table B-1). Figures 3 and 4 in Appendix A includes an updated map of CNDDB special-status plant and wildlife species recorded occurrences respectively within approximately 10 miles of the project site.
4.4.1 Special-Status Botanical Resources
The 2022 CNDDB review revealed the recorded occurrences of 16 special-status plant species within a ten-mile radius of the project site. None of these species are formally listed as rare, threatened or endangered. However, one is a CNPS rank 4, and the rest are CNPS rank 1.B species suggesting regional or statewide rarity. The special-status plant species occurrences recorded in the CNDDB are commonly associated with a specific soil type, native undisturbed habitat, moisture regime (e.g. wetland), and/or elevation range that dictates the range or microhabitat of the species. No rare, threatened, or endangered plant species or remnants thereof were observed within the project area during SII field surveys. However, surveys were not conducted during the spring flowering period.
Only one native plant was observed amongst the non-native ruderal species in the fallow cropland areas. The documented long-term cultivation of the site precludes the establishment of any native habitat to support the special-status plant species recorded in the region. Table B-1 in Appendix B provides the required habitat, or micro-habitat element for the special-status plants, supporting the findings that there would be no special-status plants expected to occur in the cropland or developed areas of the project site.
4.4.2 SPECIAL-STATUS WILDLIFE
The 2022 CNDDB search revealed the recorded occurrences of 19 special-status wildlife species within the ten-mile search radius of the project site. Special-status wildlife species known from the region evaluated for this study are discussed below by groups based upon habitat preferences, specific habitat use requirements (i.e. terrestrial or aquatic), mobility, and migratory patterns.
Aquatic Species – The CNDDB has recorded occurrences for the western pond turtle and western spadefoot toad and the vernal pool fairy shrimp within the ten-mile search range. The western pond turtle is a highly aquatic species found in lowlands and foothills in or near permanent sources of deep water with dense, shrubby, emergent or riparian vegetation, none of which occur on the project site.
No aquatic habitats of any kind were observed during SII field surveys of the project site. As such, the project site does not support suitable aquatic habitat for this species. The vernal pool fairy shrimp and western spadefoot are closely associated with vernal pools or temporary pond/puddle habitats that are Attachment 6
Attachment 6
STRAVINSKI-DAOU PROJECT – 5175 AIRPORT ROAD, PASO ROBLES CA REVISED BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, DEC. 2022 (APN:025-434-002) 5 not subject to flowing water. No evidence of vernal pool or seasonal pond/puddle habitats were observed during SII field surveys or indicated on the review of multiple years of aerial photography. As such, the project site does not support suitable seasonal aquatic habitat for these two species.
Insects – The Lompoc grasshopper (Trimerotropis occulens) is mostly associated with sandy soils in grassland, coastal scrub or chaparral habitats. No such habitat occurs on site and the study area is well outside the known range of this species. The Atascadero June beetle (Polyphylla nubila) is known only from inland sand dunes that are not present on the project site (only gravelly loam soils) and would not occur. The crotch bumble bee (Bombus crotchii) ranges throughout California to Baja typically found in wildflower rich grasslands and shrublands. The local CNDDB record is an unspecified location from a 1959 collection. The project site is not wildflower rich and does not represent suitable habitat for the species.
Reptiles – The legless lizard, coast horned lizard, and San Joaquin coachwhip require undisturbed native habitats with suitable prey (insects/ants, small mammals respectively) that do not occur on the cultivated/developed project site. As such, they are not expected to occur.
Birds – The CNDDB includes occurrences for wide-ranging resident and migratory bird species known from the region of the project site. The tricolored blackbird is locally nomadic but requires bulrush and cattail marsh or ponds for breeding that are not present on the project site. The least Bell’s vireo is a breeding season migrant known from the Salinas River that requires dense riparian habitat that does not occur on the project site. As such, the project site does not support suitable habitat for these two species.
The local migrant/nomadic burrowing owl is closely associated with ground squirrel burrows for nest and winter refuge sites in grassland habitat with insect and small mammal prey base. None of which occurs on the cultivated/developed project site. The wide ranging locally nomadic and migrant raptors listed in the CNDDB might use the site for very occasional foraging habitat depending on the cycle of cultivation and randomness of flying over the site. This includes the golden eagle, ferruginous hawk (winter migrant), Swainson’s hawk (breeding migrant), and prairie falcon. The cultivated site does not represent any substantial foraging habitat opportunity for these wide-ranging species.
Mammals – The American badger, Salinas pocket mouse, and Nelson’s antelope squirrel are typically found in grasslands with friable soils for digging burrows. The Monterey dusky-footed woodrat requires woody habitat types such as is a woodland, riparian forest, or shrublands. The cultivated and developed site does not support suitable habitat for any of these mammal species.
The Townsend’s big-eared bat and pallid bat may occupy a variety of woodland, forest, and shrubland habitats. While highly sensitive to disturbance, bats may occupy attics or other abandoned parts of buildings. No suitable native habitat occurs on the site, however, the buildings could support a bat roost.
No obvious evidence of bat use within existing structures, or bats flying, were observed during the 2020 or 2022 SII field surveys that include observations through dusk (in 2020).
4.4.3 San Joaquin Kit Fox Habitat Evaluation
The project site was specifically evaluated for suitability to provide habitat for the San Joaquin kit fox (SJKF) which is a wide-ranging species known from northeastern and southeastern San Luis Obispo County. The SJKF occupies open country grassland, open scrubland, and oak savannah where there are Attachment 6
Attachment 6
STRAVINSKI-DAOU PROJECT – 5175 AIRPORT ROAD, PASO ROBLES CA REVISED BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, DEC. 2022 (APN:025-434-002) 6 friable soils for burrowing and an abundant rodent prey base. This small species of fox is known to use available ground squirrel or other existing burrows for den sites as they typically do not excavate their own dens. The developed cultivated project site itself does not support quality habitat as it is regularly tilled limiting burrowing animals and the establishment of a prey base.
The project site does fall within the agency established movement corridor linking the Camp Roberts subpopulation with the core population in the Carrizo Plains. As shown on Figure 5 in Appendix A, the study area falls within the SJKF corridor between the Carrizo Plain and Camp Roberts within 10 miles of numerous recorded occurrences. Most of the occurrences are on Camp Roberts where they have not been seen in many years (dates are shown next to the occurrences on Figure 5). The Chandler Ranch observations south of Highway 46 go back to the 1990’s with no recent records of observations. There are 2014 observations of scat from a scent station study updating previous observations almost 10 miles to the east of the project site near Shandon.
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) requires the completion of the SJKF habitat evaluation form to evaluate potential impacts on the SJKF resulting from discretionary projects. The updated habitat evaluation form completed for this project site is provided in Appendix C that shows a preliminary score of 73. Typically, scores above 50 require compensatory mitigation for the loss of habitat resulting from project implementation with scores in the 70’s typically equating to a 3:1 ratio.
The study area is adjacent to 3:1 mitigation ratio area designated by the San Luis Obispo County’s map of Standard San Joaquin Kit Fox Mitigation Ratios. The City of Paso Robles does not have a designated ratio within the city limits. The City in consultation with the CDFW will review the project site against the SJKF habitat evaluation form scoring and make a final determination of the appropriate ratio for project impact compensation for the loss of movement habitat within the corridor. No direct take (i.e. mortality, destruction of active dens, etc.) is allowed under the habitat mitigation fee program.
5.0 IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES
5.1 IMPACT ASSESSMENT
The proposed Daou Campus project would convert the approximately 17.5 of annually cultivated cropland and 2.5 acres of existing development to a fully developed site. The project site does not support any native plant community and provides minimal habitat for locally common wildlife accustomed to agricultural lands.
Per the Tree Evaluation Letter Report prepared for the project (Althouse and Meade, May 2022), three (3) native valley oaks (Tree #s 1 – 3) will require removal to support the currently proposed project.
These trees range in diameter at breast height (dbh) from 4 to 67 inches and received health ratings ranging from “fair” to “poor”. Per the Tree Evaluation Letter, trees #s 1 and 2 are growing along Airport Road under overhead power lines. Airport Road is to be widened to accommodate a center turn lane, which will impact the critical root zone of Tree # 1 by >30 percent. In addition, the overhead power lines are to be moved underground. New utilities, sewer, and water will also be installed and significantly impact the critical root zones of Tree #’s 1 and 2. Therefore, these oaks are proposed for removal due to the construction impacts of road widening and new utility installations. Tree No. 3 is in poor condition and is in the proposed parking lot area. Therefore, this oak is proposed for removal. The remaining three oak trees (Tree #s 4-6) are proposed to be retained, and will be incorporated into the proposed parking lot design.
Attachment 6
Attachment 6
STRAVINSKI-DAOU PROJECT – 5175 AIRPORT ROAD, PASO ROBLES CA REVISED BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, DEC. 2022 (APN:025-434-002) 7 The Mitigation Recommendations provided in the Tree Evaluation Letter were reviewed as part of this analysis for consistency with the City’s Oak Tree Preservation Ordinance. Based on this review, the Tree Evaluation Letter provides appropriate oak tree removal Mitigation Recommendations that would fully mitigate impacts related to the removal of the three (3) valley oaks. In summary, oak trees removed by the project would be replaced in accordance with the City’s Oak Tree Preservation Ordinance. Planting small trees in quantity to account for the mitigated dbh equivalency would satisfy this requirement.
Mitigation for the removal of three oak trees (Tree No.1, 2, and 3) is equivalent to 25.5-inches in caliper for oak replacement trees (or nine, 3-inch caliper valley oaks). The Tree Evaluation Letter also includes other appropriate Mitigation Measures for establishing tree protection zones for the oak trees to be retained, tree protection fencing, signage, construction monitoring, and post-construction reporting.
The retention of three (3) valley oak trees combined with planting nine (9) replacement trees per the Mitigation Measures in the Tree Evaluation Letter would continue to provide nesting, foraging, and roosting habitat for resident and migratory birds.
Construction of the proposed project would convert active cropland and developed areas to developed uses. No special-status plant or wildlife species were observed and are not expected to occur on the project site as there is no suitable habitat for any special-status wildlife. Given there is no special-status plant or wildlife species habitat present on the site, impacts on general biological resources are considered to be less than significant.
Vegetation and tree removal (clearing and grubbing) during the nesting season for birds could result in the destruction of active bird’s nests. Destruction of active nests is prohibited by the Fish and Game Code of California Sections 3503 and 3503.1 (raptors specifically). As such, this could be considered a potentially significant impact requiring mitigation to avoid take or destruction of active nests thereby reducing this potentially significant impact to a less than significant level.
While somewhat unlikely, bats could occupy the structures prior to removal. As such, this could be considered a potentially significant impact requiring mitigation to avoid destruction of an active bat roost thereby reducing this potentially significant impact to a less than significant level.
The project is within the SJKF movement corridor between the Carrizo Plain core population and the Camp Roberts subpopulation. While there are abundant open lands through the area, the project could incrementally block or degrade SJKF movement through this corridor. The proposed project would develop approximately 20 acres, 2.5 acres of which is already developed (See Figure 2), leaving a net impact to SJKF movement corridor of 17.5 acres. This loss of 17.5 acres of cropland habitat movement opportunity for the SJKF is considered a potentially significant impact requiring mitigation to contribute to the long-term conservation of the movement corridor through the region.
Attachment 6
Attachment 6
STRAVINSKI-DAOU PROJECT – 5175 AIRPORT ROAD, PASO ROBLES CA REVISED BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, DEC. 2022 (APN:025-434-002) 8
5.2 RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES
The following mitigation measures are recommended to reduce potentially significant impacts on nesting birds, bats, SJKF, and oak trees to a less than significant level.
MM BIO-1: To reduce any potentially significant impact on nesting birds from vegetation and tree removals, the following mitigation measure is recommended:
Vegetation removal and initial site disturbance shall be conducted between September 1st and January 31st outside of the nesting season for birds. If vegetation and/or tree removal is planned for the bird nesting season (February 1st to August 31st), then preconstruction nesting bird surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist to determine if any active nests would be impacted by project construction. If no active nests are found, then no further mitigation shall be required.
If any active nests are found that would be impacted by construction, then the nest sites shall be avoided with the establishment of a non-disturbance buffer zone around active nests as determined by a qualified biologist. Nest sites shall be avoided and protected with the non-disturbance buffer zone until the adults and young of the year are no longer reliant on the nest site for survival as determined by a qualified biologist. As such, avoiding disturbance or take of an active nest would reduce potential impacts on nesting birds to a less-than-significant level.
MM BIO-2: To reduce any potentially significant impact on bat roosts, the following mitigation measure is recommended:
Prior to demolition of the existing buildings, an evaluation for bat usage shall be conducted by a qualified biologist. If no evidence of bat use is detected, then no further mitigation shall be required. If an active bat roost is found that would be impacted by construction, then the roost site shall be avoided and protected until the roost is no longer occupied. Natal roosts shall be avoided until the adults and young disperse from the site. Exclusionary measures may be implemented for non-natal roosts to avoid direct mortality of individuals. As such, avoiding disturbance to an active natal roost, and avoiding direct mortality from demolition would reduce potential impacts on roosting bats to a less-than-significant level.
MM BIO-3: To reduce any potentially significant impact on the regional SJKF movement corridor, and avoid take of any SJKF from project construction, the following mitigation measures are recommended:
Prior to issuance of grading and/or construction permits, the applicant shall submit evidence to the City of Paso Robles Community Development Department that states that one or a combination of the following three San Joaquin kit fox compensatory mitigation measures has been implemented. The City in consultation with the CDFW will review the project site against the SJKF habitat evaluation form scoring and make a final determination of the appropriate ratio for project impact compensation for the loss of movement habitat within the corridor. The calculations below are for reference and assume a maximum 3:1 ratio will be required by CDFW.
Attachment 6
Attachment 6
STRAVINSKI-DAOU PROJECT – 5175 AIRPORT ROAD, PASO ROBLES CA REVISED BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, DEC. 2022 (APN:025-434-002) 9 a. Provide for the protection in perpetuity, through acquisition of fee or a conservation easement of 52.5 acres (17.5 acres of development multiplied by 3 as a result of an applied 3:1 mitigation ratio) of suitable habitat in the kit fox corridor area (e.g. within the San Luis Obispo County kit fox habitat area, northwest of Highway 58), either on-site or off-site, and provide for a non-wasting endowment to provide for management and monitoring of the property in perpetuity. Lands to be conserved shall be subject to the review and approval of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and the City. This mitigation alternative (a.) requires that all aspects if this program must be in place before City permit issuance or initiation of any ground disturbing activities.
b. Deposit funds into an approved in-lieu fee program, which would provide for the protection in perpetuity of suitable habitat in the kit fox corridor area within San Luis Obispo County, and provide for a non-wasting endowment for management and monitoring of the property in perpetuity. Mitigation alternative (b) above can be completed by providing funds to The Nature Conservancy (TNC) pursuant to the Voluntary Fee-Based Compensatory Mitigation Program (Program). The Program was established in agreement between the CDFW and TNC to preserve San Joaquin kit fox habitat, and to provide a voluntary mitigation alternative to project proponents who must mitigate the impacts of projects in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The fee, payable to “The Nature Conservancy,” would total: $131,250 (17.5 x 3 x $2,500).
This fee is calculated based on the 2020 cost-per-unit of $2,500 per acre of mitigation, which is scheduled to be adjusted to address the increasing cost of property in San Luis Obispo County; actual cost may increase (or decrease) depending on the timing of payment and final mitigation ratio required. This fee must be paid after the CDFW provides written notification about your mitigation options but prior to City permit issuance and initiation of any ground disturbing activities.
c. Purchase credits in a CDFW-approved conservation bank, which would provide for the protection in perpetuity of suitable habitat within the kit fox corridor area and provide for a non-wasting endowment for management and monitoring of the property in perpetuity. Mitigation alternative (c) above can be completed by purchasing credits from the Palo Prieto Conservation Bank (see contact information below). The Palo Prieto Conservation Bank was established to preserve San Joaquin kit fox habitat, and to provide a voluntary mitigation alternative to project proponents who must mitigate the impacts of projects in accordance with the CEQA. The cost for purchasing credits is payable to the owners of The Palo Prieto Conservation Bank, would total: $131,250 (17.5 x 3 x $2,500).
This fee is calculated based on the 2020 cost-per-credit of $2,500 per acre of mitigation. The fee is established by the conservation bank owner and may change at any time. Actual cost may increase (or decrease) depending on the timing of payment and final mitigation ratio required. Purchase of credits must be completed prior to City permit issuance and initiation of any ground disturbing activities.
Attachment 6
Attachment 6
STRAVINSKI-DAOU PROJECT – 5175 AIRPORT ROAD, PASO ROBLES CA REVISED BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, DEC. 2022 (APN:025-434-002) 10 MM BIO-4: To avoid direct take of SJKF during construction in accordance with the San Luis Obispo County Guide to SJKF Mitigation Procedures Under CEQA, the project owner(s) shall adopt the Standard Kit Fox CEQA Mitigation Measures and shall be included on development plans. The following measures shall be implemented:
x Within 30 days of initiation of site disturbance and/or construction, a qualified biologist shall conduct a pre-activity (i.e. pre-construction) survey for known or potential kit fox dens and submit a letter (or email) to the City reporting the date the survey was conducted, the survey protocol, survey results, and what measures were necessary (and completed), as applicable, to address any potential kit fox activity within the project limits. This may include implementing the 3-day tracking survey per the USFWS Standardized Recommendations for Protection of the Endangered San Joaquin Kit Fox Prior To Or During Ground Disturbance (USFWS 2011) if deemed necessary by the qualified biologist.
x A maximum 25 mph speed limit shall be required at the project site during construction activities.
x All construction activities shall cease at dusk and not start before dawn. x A qualified biologist shall be on-site immediately prior to initiation of project activities to inspect for any large burrows (e.g., known and potential dens) and to ensure no wildlife are injured during project activities. If dens are encountered, they should be avoided as discussed below.
x Exclusion zone boundaries shall be established around all known and potential kit fox dens.
x All excavations deeper than 2 feet shall be completely covered at the end of each working day.
x All pipes, culverts, or similar structures shall be inspected for SJKF and other wildlife before burying, capping, or moving.
x All exposed openings of pipes, culverts, or similar structures shall be capped or temporarily sealed prior to the end of each working day. x All food-related trash shall be removed from the site at the end of each work day. x Project-related equipment shall be prohibited outside of designated work areas and access routes.
x No firearms shall be allowed in the project area.
x Disturbance to burrows shall be avoided to the greatest extent feasible. x No rodenticides or herbicides should be applied in the project area. x Permanent fences shall allow for SJKF passage through or underneath (i.e., an approximate 4-inch passage gap shall remain at ground level). x Prior to issuance of grading and/or construction permit and within 30 days prior to initiation of site disturbance and/or construction, all personnel associated with the project shall attend a worker education training program, conducted by a qualified biologist, to avoid or reduce impacts on sensitive biological resources (i.e. San Joaquin kit fox). At a minimum, as the program relates to the kit fox, the training shall include the kit fox’s life history, all mitigation measures specified by the City, as well as any related biological report(s) prepared for the project. The applicant Attachment 6
Attachment 6
STRAVINSKI-DAOU PROJECT – 5175 AIRPORT ROAD, PASO ROBLES CA REVISED BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, DEC. 2022 (APN:025-434-002) 11 shall notify the City shortly prior to this meeting. A kit fox fact sheet shall also be developed prior to the training program, and distributed at the training program to all contractors, employers and other personnel involved with the construction of the project.
x During the site-disturbance and/or construction phase, any contractor or employee that inadvertently kills or injures a San Joaquin kit fox or who finds any such animal either dead, injured, or entrapped shall be required to report the incident immediately to the applicant and City. In the event that any observations are made of injured or dead kit fox, the applicant shall immediately notify the USFWS and CDFW by telephone. In addition, formal notification shall be provided in writing within three working days of the finding of any such animal(s). Notification shall include the date, time, location and circumstances of the incident. Any threatened or endangered species found dead or injured shall be turned over immediately to CDFW for care, analysis, or disposition.
MM BIO-5: To fully mitigate proposed impacts to three native valley oaks, the project owner(s) shall implement the Mitigation Recommendations provided in the May 12, 2022, Tree Evaluation Letter prepared by Althouse and Mead.
6.0 CONCLUSIONS
Based on the findings described above establishing the existing conditions of biological resources within the project site, and incorporation of the recommended mitigation measures, implementation of the proposed project would not result in any substantial adverse effects on biological, botanical, or wetland habitat resources. Therefore, with mitigation measures incorporated into the project, direct and indirect project impacts on biological resources are considered to be less than significant.
Attachment 6
Attachment 6
STRAVINSKI-DAOU PROJECT – 5175 AIRPORT ROAD, PASO ROBLES CA REVISED BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, DEC. 2022 (APN:025-434-002) 12
8.0 REFERENCES
1. Althouse and Mead. May 2022. Tree Evaluation Letter Report, APN 025-434-002, 5175 Airport Road, City of Paso Robles, California.
2. Baldwin, B.G., D.H. Goldman, D.J. Keil, R. Patterson, T.J. Rosatti, Editors. 2012. The Jepson Manual, Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition Thoroughly Revised and Expanded. UC Press.
3. California Native Plant Society (CNPS). 2022. Online Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California. Accessed December 2022.
4. California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2019. Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) of recorded occurrences of special-status species. Accessed December 2022.
5. CALFLORA. 2022. Online database of native plants of California. Accessed December 2022.
6. Hickman, J.C., Editor. 1993. The Jepson Manual, Higher Plants of California. University of California Press.
7. Holland, R.F. 1986. Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife Nongame-Heritage Program.
8. Holland, V.L., and D.J. Keil. 1990. California Vegetation. Biological Sciences Department, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California.
9. Jameson, E.W. & Hans J. Peeters. 2004. Mammals of California, Revised Edition. University of California Press.
10. Jennings, M.R. and M.P. Hayes. 1994. Amphibian and Reptile Species of Special Concern in California. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Contract # 8023. Inland Fisheries Division, Rancho Cordova, California.
11. Mayer, W. and W. Laudenslayer, Editors. 1988. A Guide to Wildlife Habitats of California.
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection.
12. Peterson, R.T. 1990. A Field Guide to Western Birds, Houghton Mifflin Company.
13. Stebbins, R.C., and McGinnis, S.M. 2012. Field Guide to Amphibians and Reptiles of California:
Revised Edition (California Natural History Guides) University of California Press, 2012
14. Sage Institute, Inc. January 2020. Biological resources Assessment for the Daou Campus Project, 5175 Airport Road, Paso Robles, CA 93446, (APN: 025-434-002).
15. Sawyer, J.O., T. Keeler-Wolf, and J.M. Evens. 2009. A Manual of California Vegetation, Second Edition. California Native Plant Society Press, Sacramento.
16. U.S.D.A Soil Conservation Service (Natural Resources Conservation Service). 1977. Soil Survey of San Luis Obispo County, Paso Robles Area.
17. USFWS. 2011. Standardized Recommendations for Protection Of The Endangered San Joaquin Kit Fox Prior To Or During Ground Disturbance.
Attachment 6
Attachment 6
STRAVINSKI-DAOU PROJECT – 5175 AIRPORT ROAD, PASO ROBLES CA REVISED BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, DEC. 2022 (APN:025-434-002)
APPENDIX A
FIGURES
FIGURE 1: VICINITY LOCATION MAP
FIGURE 2: HABITAT MAP
FIGURE 3: CNDDB PLANT SPECIES OCCURRENCES MAP (10-MILE SEARCH RADIUS) FIGURE 4: CNDDB WILDLIFE SPECIES OCCURRENCES MAP (10-MILE SEARCH RADIUS) FIGURE 5: CNDDB SJKFOCCURRENCES MAP (10-MILE SEARCH RADIUS) FIGURE 6: REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPHS
Attachment 6
Attachment 6
Attachment 6
Attachment 6
Attachment 6
Attachment 6
Attachment 6
Attachment 6
Attachment 6
Attachment 6
Attachment 6
Attachment 6
STRAVINSKI-DAOU PROJECT – 5175 AIRPORT ROAD, PASO ROBLES CA REVISED BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, DEC. 2022 (APN:025-434-002)
APPENDIX B
TABLE B-1: CNDDB SPECIAL-STATUS SPECIES (UPDATED DECEMBER 2022)
Attachment 6
Attachment 6
Stravinski-Daou Project
Revised Biological Resources Assessment
Table B-2
CNDDB Special-Status Species Recorded Occurrences (10-mile Radius; Dec. 2022) Scientific Name Common Name FedList CalList SRank
CNPS
Rare Plant
Rank General Habitat Description Micro Habitat Description # of CNDDB
Occurrences
w/in 10 miles
Potential to Occur
Onsite
Agelaius tricolor tricolored blackbird None
Threatened;
SSC S1S2 --
Highly colonial species, most numerous in Central Valley & vicinity. Largely endemic to California.
Requires open water, protected nesting substrate, and
foraging area with insect prey within a few km of the
colony. 3 low
Aquila chrysaetos golden eagle None None; FP S3 --
Rolling foothills, mountain areas, sage-juniper flats, and desert.
Cliff-walled canyons provide nesting habitat in most parts of range; also, large trees in open areas. 1 low / foraging only Athene cunicularia burrowing owl None None; SSC S3 --
Open, dry annual or perennial grasslands, deserts, and
scrublands characterized by low-growing vegetation.
Subterranean nester, dependent upon burrowing
mammals, most notably, the California ground squirrel. 5 low / winter only Buteo regalis ferruginous hawk None None S3S4 --
Open grasslands, sagebrush flats, desert scrub, low
foothills and fringes of pinyon and juniper habitats.
Eats mostly lagomorphs, ground squirrels, and mice.
Population trends may follow lagomorph population cycles. 1 low / foraging only Buteo swainsoni Swainson's hawk None Threatened S3 --
Breeds in grasslands with scattered trees, juniper-sage flats, riparian areas, savannahs, & agricultural or ranch lands with groves or lines of trees.
Requires adjacent suitable foraging areas such as
grasslands, or alfalfa or grain fields supporting rodent populations. 2 low / foraging only
Falco mexicanus prairie falcon None None S4 -- Inhabits dry, open terrain, either level or hilly.
Breeding sites located on cliffs. Forages far afield, even to marshlands and ocean shores. 2 low / foraging only
Vireo bellii pusillus least Bell's vireo Endangered Endangered S2 -- Summer resident of Southern California in low riparian in vicinity of water or in dry river bottoms; below 2000 ft.
Nests placed along margins of bushes or on twigs
projecting into pathways, usually willow, Baccharis,
mesquite. 2 none
Anniella pulchra northern California legless lizard None None; SSC S3 -- Sandy or loose loamy soils under sparse vegetation.
Soil moisture is essential. They prefer soils with a high moisture content. 5 none
Emys marmorata western pond turtle None None; SSC S3 -- A thoroughly aquatic turtle of ponds, marshes, rivers,
streams and irrigation ditches, usually with aquatic
vegetation, below 6000 ft elevation.
Needs basking sites and suitable (sandy banks or grassy open fields) upland habitat up to 0.5 km from water for egg-laying. 3 none
Masticophis flagellum ruddocki San Joaquin coachwhip None SSC S2? -- Open, dry habitats with little or no tree cover. Found in valley grassland and saltbush scrub in the San Joaquin
Valley. Needs mammal burrows for refuge and oviposition sites. 3 none Phrynosoma blainvillii coast horned lizard None SSC S3S4 -- Frequents a wide variety of habitats, most common in
lowlands along sandy washes with scattered low bushes.
Open areas for sunning, bushes for cover, patches of loose soil for burial, and abundant supply of ants and other
insects. 1 none
Spea hammondii western spadefoot None SSC S3 --
Occurs primarily in grassland habitats, but can be found in valley-foothill hardwood woodlands. Vernal pools are essential for breeding and egg-laying.14 none Ammospermophilus nelsoni Nelson's antelope squirrel None Threatened S2S3 -- Western San Joaquin Valley from 200-1200 ft elev. On dry, sparsely vegetated loam soils.
Dig burrows or use k-rat burrows. Need widely scattered shrubs, forbs and grasses in broken terrain with gullies and washes. 1 none
Antrozous pallidus pallid bat None SSC S3 --
Deserts, grasslands, shrublands, woodlands and forests.
Most common in open, dry habitats with rocky areas for
roosting.
Roosts must protect bats from high temperatures. Very
sensitive to disturbance of roosting sites. 1 none
Corynorhinus townsendii Townsend's big-eared bat None SSC S2 -- Throughout California in a wide variety of habitats. Most common in mesic sites.
Roosts in the open, hanging from walls and ceilings.
Roosting sites limiting. Extremely sensitive to human
disturbance. 2low
Neotoma macrotis luciana Monterey dusky-footed woodrat None SSC S3 -- Forest habitats of moderate canopy and moderate to
dense understory. Also in chaparral habitats.
Nests constructed of grass, leaves, sticks, feathers, etc.
Population may be limited by availability of nest materials. 3 none Perognathus inornatus psammophilus Salinas pocket mouse None SSC S1 -- Annual grassland and desert shrub communities in the
Salinas Valley.
Fine-textured, sandy, friable soils. Burrows for cover and nesting. 4 none
Taxidea taxus American badger None SSC S3 --
Most abundant in drier open stages of most shrub, forest, and herbaceous habitats, with friable soils.
Needs sufficient food, friable soils and open, uncultivated ground. Preys on burrowing rodents. Digs burrows. 23 low Vulpes macrotis mutica San Joaquin kit fox Endangered Threatened S2 -- Annual grasslands or grassy open stages with scattered
shrubby vegetation.
Need loose-textured sandy soils for burrowing, and
suitable prey base. 28 low
Branchinecta lynchi vernal pool fairy shrimp Threatened None S3 -- Endemic to the grasslands of the Central Valley, Central Coast mountains, and South Coast mountains, in astatic
rain-filled pools.
Inhabit small, clear-water sandstone-depression pools and grassed swale, earth slump, or basalt-flow depression
pools. 12 none
Polyphylla nubila Atascadero June beetle None None S1 -- Known only from inland sand dunes in San Luis Obispo
County. 1 none
Trimerotropis occulens Lompoc grasshopper None None S1S2 -- Known only from Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo
counties. Rocky gravelly habitats 1 none
Abies bracteata bristlecone fir None None S2S3 1B.3
Lower montane coniferous forest, broadleafed upland
forest, chaparral, riparian woodland.
Rocky sites in Monterey and San Luis Obispo counties.
Sometimes serpentine. 150-1465 m. 1 none
Agrostis hooveri Hoover's bent grass None None S2 1B.2
Chaparral, cismontane woodland, closed-cone coniferous
forest, valley and foothill grassland. Sandy sites. 60-765 m. 1 none Antirrhinum ovatum oval-leaved snapdragon None None S3 4.2 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, pinyon and juniper
woodland, valley and foothill grassland.
From open hillsides to small vernal pools in clay or gypsum soils w/in grassland or woodland. Sites often alkaline. 200- 1000 m. 1 none
Aristocapsa insignis Indian Valley spineflower None None S1 1B.2 Cismontane woodland. Sandy substrates. 180-1070 m. 1 none Calycadenia villosa dwarf calycadenia None None S3 1B.1 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, valley and foothill
grassland, meadows and seeps.
Open, dry meadows, hillsides, gravelly outwashes. 240-
1350 m. 2 none
Castilleja densiflora var. obispoensis San Luis Obispo owl's-clover None None S2 1B.2 Valley and foothill grassland, meadows and seeps. Sometimes on serpentine. 9-485 m. 3 none Caulanthus lemmonii Lemmon's jewelflower None None S3 1B.2 Pinyon and juniper woodland, valley and foothill grassland. 75-1585 m. 3 none Delphinium umbraculorum umbrella larkspur None None S3 1B.3 Cismontane woodland, chaparral. Mesic sites. 215-2075 m. 1 none Eriastrum luteum yellow-flowered eriastrum None None S2 1B.2 Broadleafed upland forest, cismontane woodland,
chaparral. On bare sandy decomposed granite slopes. 240-580 m. 1 none Horkelia cuneata var. puberula mesa horkelia None None S1 1B.1 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, coastal scrub. Sandy or gravelly sites. 15-1645 m. 1 none Horkelia cuneata var. sericea Kellogg's horkelia None None S1? 1B.1 Closed-cone coniferous forest, coastal scrub, coastal
dunes, chaparral.
Old dunes, coastal sandhills; openings. Sandy or gravelly soils. 5-430 m. 1 none
Juncus luciensis Santa Lucia dwarf rush None None S3 1B.2 Vernal pools, meadows and seeps, lower montane
coniferous forest, chaparral, Great Basin scrub.
Vernal pools, ephemeral drainages, wet meadow habitats
and streamsides. 280-2035 m. 3 none
Lepidium jaredii ssp. jaredii Jared's pepper-grass None None S1S2 1B.2 Valley and foothill grassland.
Alkali flats and sinks. Sandy, alkaline, sometimes adobe soils. 335-1005 m. 1 none
Monolopia gracilens woodland woollythreads None None S3 1B.2 Chaparral, valley and foothill grassland, cismontane
woodland, broadleafed upland forest, North Coast
coniferous forest.
Grassy sites, in openings; sandy to rocky soils. Often seen on serpentine after burns, but may have only weak affinity to serpentine. 120-975 m. 1 none
Navarretia nigelliformis ssp. radians shining navarretia None None S2 1B.2 Cismontane woodland, valley and foothill grassland, vernal pools.
Apparently in grassland, and not necessarily in vernal
pools. 60-975 m. 9 none
Plagiobothrys uncinatus hooked popcornflower None None S2 1B.2 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, valley and foothill
grassland.
Sandstone outcrops and canyon sides; often in burned or disturbed areas. 210-855 m. 1 none
Valley Oak Woodland Valley Oak Woodland None None S2.1 -- -- -- 4 none
NATURAL COMMUNITIES
BIRDS
REPTILES / AMPHIBIANS
MAMMALS
INVERTEBRATES
PLANTS
Attachment 6
Attachment 6
STRAVINSKI-DAOU PROJECT – 5175 AIRPORT ROAD, PASO ROBLES CA REVISED BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, DEC. 2022 (APN:025-434-002)
APPENDIX C
SAN JOAQUIN KIT FOX HABITAT EVALUATION FORM (UPDATED DECEMBER 2022)
Attachment 6
Attachment 6
San Joaquin Kit Fox Habitat Evaluation Form
Cover Sheet
Project Name: Stravinski-Daou Project Date: December 12, 2022 Project Location*: 5715 Airport Road, Paso Robles, CA
(See Appendix A Location Maps)
*Include project vicinity map and project boundary on copy of U.S.G.S. 7.5 minute map (size may be reduced)
U.S.G.S. Quad Map Name: Paso Robles______________________ Lat/Long or UTM coordinates (if available): 35.674398 -120.637552 Project Description: The updated project description consists of subdividing the approximately 19.75-acre property into two (2) parcels, roughly equal in size at 9.87-acres each.
Phase 1 proposes to construct an approximately 196,000 square foot warehouse building for refrigerated wine storage, distribution, and a fulfillment center. Phase 2 proposes to construct an approximately 157,000 square foot wine production facility. Phase 2 interior uses include barrel storage, bottling/packages areas, warehousing, and fermentation areas. The exterior uses include a crush pad, mechanical yards, and wastewater treatment.
Project Size Acres Amount of Kit Fox Habitat Affected Acres Quantity of WHR Habitat Types Impacted (i.e. - 2 acres annual grassland, 3 acres blue oak woodland)
WHR type: Cropland 17.5 Acres
WHR type: Urban/Developed 2.5 Acres
WHR type Acres
WHR type Acres
Comments: Review of available aerial photography shows that the project site has been in active cultivation with alfalfa and dryland farming, and appurtenant structures, going back to at least 1977. The proposed project site is surrounded on all sides by a variety of commercial, industrial, and agricultural uses.
Attachment 6
Attachment 6
San Joaquin Kit Fox Habitat Evaluation Form
Form Completed By: Jason Kirschenstein, Principal Biologist, Sage Institute, Inc.
Is the project area within 10 miles of a recorded San Joaquin kit fox observation or within contiguous suitable habitat as defined in question 2 (A-E) Yes – Continue with evaluation form
No – Evaluation form/surveys are not necessary
1. Importance of the project area relative to Recovery Plan for Upland Species of the San Joaquin Valley, California (Williams et al., 1998)
A. Project would block or degrade an existing corridor linking core populations or isolate a subpopulation(20)
B. Project is within core population(15)
C. Project area is identified within satellite populations (12) D. Project area is within a corridor linking satellite populations (10) E. Project area is not within any of the previously described areas but is within known kit fox range(5)
2. Habitat characteristics of projectarea.
A. Annual grassland or saltbush scrub present >50% of site (15) B. Grassland or saltbush scrub present but comprises<50% of project area (10) C. Oak savannah present on >50% of site (8)
D. Fallow ag fields or grain/alfalfa crops (7)
E. Orchards/vineyards (5)
F. Intensively maintained row crops orsuitable vegetation absent (0)
3. Isolation of project area.
A. Project area surrounded by contiguous kit fox habitat as described in Question 2a-e (15)
B. Project area adjacent to at least 40 acres of contiguous habitat or part of an existing corridor (10)
C.Project area adjacent to <40 acres of habitat but linked by existing corridor (i.e., river, canal, aqueduct)(7)
D. Project area surrounded by ag but less than 200 yards from habitat (5) E. Project area completely isolated by row crops or development and is greater than 200 yards from potential habitat(0)
4. Potential for increased mortality as a result of project implementation. Mortalitymay come from direct (e.g., - construction related) or indirect (e.g., - vehicle strikes due to increases inpost development traffic) sources.
A. Increased mortality likely (10)
B. Unknown mortality effects (5)
C. No long term effect onmortality (0)
Attachment 6
Attachment 6
5. Amount of potential kit fox habitat affected.
A. >320 acres (10)
B. 160 - 319 acres(7)
C. 80 - 159 acres(5)
D. 40 - 79 acres(3)
E. < 40 acres (1)
6. Results of projectimplementation.
A. Project site will be permanently converted and will no longer support foxes (10) B. Project area will be temporarily impacted but will require periodic disturbance for ongoing maintenance(7)
C. Project area will be temporarily impacted and no maintenance necessary (5) D. Project will result in changes to agricultural crops (2) E. No habitat impacts (0)
7. Project Shape
A. Large Block (10)
B. Linear with > 40 foot right-of-way(5)
C. Linear with < 40 foot right-of-way(3)
8. Have San Joaquin kit foxes been observed within 3 miles of the project area within the last 10 years?
A. Yes (10)
B. No (0)
Scoring
1. Recovery importance 20
2. Habitat condition 7
3. Isolation 15
4. Mortality 10
5. Quantity of habitat impacted 1
6. Project results 10
7. Project shape 10
8. Recent observations 0
TOTAL 73
Attachment 6
Attachment 6
1602 Spring Street, Paso Robles, CA 93446
(805) 237-9626 x Fax (805) 237-9181 x www.althouseandmeade.com Tree Evaluation Letter Report for Habitat for 5175 Airport Road, City of Paso Robles March 2022
March 31, 2022
Project No.1340.01
Stravinski Development Group
c/o Brian Doswald
413 W. Yosemite Avenue, Ste 105
Madera, CA 93637
Email: [email protected]
Re: Tree Evaluation Letter Report, APN 025-434-002
5175 Airport Road,City of Paso Robles, California
Dear Mr. Doswald:
This letter report provides tree assessment results conducted on an approximate 19.7-acre property (Property) located west of Airport Road, north of Highway 46 in the City of Paso Robles, California. The Property is situated along the northern boundary of the City’s limit. The majority of the Property is undeveloped, with a single-family residence, barn, water tank, and a secondary housing structure clustered in the northeast portion. Proposed development includes demolition of the existing structures except for the water tank, and construction of a distribution center, biorention/detention pond, parking, and landscaping (Project).
Location coordinates are 120.64316°W, 35.67647 N (WGS 84) in the Paso Robles USGS 7.5’ topographic quadrangle (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Consistent with the City of Paso Robles Oak Tree Preservation Ordinance (City 2002), all oak trees within and adjacent to the Project footprint were assessed and a summary of tree health and management recommendations are provided. This letter also details oak tree mitigation measures for Project development; including oak replacement criteria for removed and impacted trees, as well as protection measures to non-impacted oak trees. 2DN7UHH3UHVHUYDWLRQ2UGLQDQFH
The Oak Tree Preservation Ordinance provides policies, regulations and specifications necessary to govern preservation of oak trees within the City and to control their pruning and/or removal.
The provisions apply to private property owners, tree maintenance services and Arborists, and new development, redevelopment and any discretionary considerations by the City that result in development of intensities that could impact existing oak trees. Preservation of existing oak trees and opportunities to promote the establishment of new oak trees is considered for development projects or development related entitlements.
Pursuant to the City’s Oak Tree Preservation Ordinance oak tree protection measures are for trees measured at six inches or greater in diameter at breast height (dbh), which is 4.5 feet above ground $WWDFKPHQW
Attachment 6
Althouse and Meade, Inc. 1340.01
Tree Evaluation Letter Report for Habitat for 5175 Airport Road, City of Paso Robles March 2022
level. Any oak tree slated for removal requires a permit which are processed through the City’s Community Development Department. Permit for pruning oak trees are in the purview of the City’s Community Development Department. Oak trees marked for removal require mitigation, where the total dbh of replacement tree (or caliper) shall be equivalent to 25 percent of the total dbh of trees removed.
Trees not marked for removal or completely avoided are assessed according to their Critical Root Zone (CRZ). The City of Paso Robles defines the CRZ as the area circumscribed around the tree’s trunk using a radius of one foot per one-inch dbh. For this document, CRZ is defined as the area using a radius of one foot per one-inch dbh. Although not specified in the ordinance, mitigation of CRZ impacts are often assessed according to the percent of CRZ impact, i.e. less than 50 percent or greater than 50 percent.
2DN7UHH(YDOXDWLRQ
Althouse and Meade certified Arborist Cory Meyer and Althouse and Meade biologist, Valerie Mattos, visited the site at 5175 Airport Road on February 9, 2022, to field-verify surveyed trees and assess the health of 6 valley oaks (Quercus lobata). Mr. Meyer performed visual inspections from the ground and used standardized tree health criteria (Table 1). All 6 trees were tagged onsite with numbered round aluminum tags. Tree identification tag numbers were documented on field maps and representative photographs were taken.
7$%/( 75((+($/7+5$7,1*6<67(0
Rating Condition
0 Deceased
1 Very poor - Evidence of massive past failures, extreme disease and or is in severe decline 2 Poor - May be saved with attention to any of the following - pruning, insect/pest eradication and future monitoring
3 Fair - Some past failures, some pests or structural defects that may be mitigated with pruning
4 Fair - May have had minor past failures, deadwood or minor structural defects 5 Good - Relatively healthy tree with little structural and or pest defects 6 Good - Healthy tree that probably can be left in its natural state 7, 8, 9 Very good - Ratings reserved for trees that have had proper arboricultural pruning and attention or have no apparent structural defects
10 Excellent - Specimen tree with excellent structure and foliage and has had many years of proper care (i.e. park or arboretum)
,QGLYLGXDO7UHHV
An individual tree assessment and representative photos are provided below and summarized in Table 2. Tree locations are depicted on Figure 3.
$WWDFKPHQW
Attachment 6
Althouse and Meade, Inc. 1340.01
Tree Evaluation Letter Report for Habitat for 5175 Airport Road, City of Paso Robles March 2022
7$%/( 75(($66(660(17'$7$
Tag
#
Species Tree
Condition
Trunk
DBH (in.)
Tree
Height
(ft.)
Canopy
Spread
(ft.)
Notes
1 Q. lobata 4 25 25 35 Topped / under power lines
2 Q. lobata
3 4/6 15 12
Low Vigor / lichen on
branches
3 Q. lobata 2 67 50 55 Past failures and cavities
4 Q. lobata 3 12 30 20 Pit scale insects/ included bark 5 Q. lobata 4 22 32 28 Included bark in trunk/galls
6 Q. lobata 4 17 32 30 Pit scale insect infestation
Tree No. 1
Tree No. 1 is a valley oak with a 25-inch dbh. The height and canopy spread were estimated at 25 feet and 35 feet, respectively. This oak received a rating of 4 for tree condition due to the compromised structure from past pruning. Utility Arborists have topped the tree as it grows directly under Airport Road power lines (Photo 1). The current overhead power lines will be moved underground. In addition, Airport Road is to be widened to accommodate a center turn lane, which will impact the critical root zone of this oak by >30%. New utilities, sewer, and water will also be installed and will have additional impacts on the critical root zone. This oak is proposed for removal due to the construction impacts.
Photo 1. Tree No.1 (right)
and Tree No.2 (left) located
next to each other and along
Airport Road. Note the
overhead power lines above
the tree canopy. View east.
February 9, 2022.
Tree No. 2
Tree No. 2 is a valley oak with two trunks (4 and 6-inch dbh). The height and canopy spread were estimated at 15 feet and 12 feet, respectively. This oak received a health rating of 3 because it has low vigor. This tree grows near Tree No. 1 and under the power lines along Airport Road (Photo 1).
Tree #2 Tree #1
$WWDFKPHQW
Attachment 6
Althouse and Meade, Inc. 1340.01
Tree Evaluation Letter Report for Habitat for 5175 Airport Road, City of Paso Robles March 2022
The new utilities, sewer, and water will have significant impacts to this tree, therefore it is proposed for removal.
Tree No. 3
Tree No. 3 is a valley oak with a 67-inch dbh. The height and canopy spread were estimated at 50 feet and 55 feet, respectively. The canopy is unbalanced and growing primarily to the north. This oak was rated a 2 for the condition because of poor structure, past branch failures, and apparent cavities in the upper trunk (Photo 2). The tree is located in the proposed parking area and is proposed for removal.
Photo 2. Tree No.3 View
southeast. February 9, 2022.
Tree No. 4
Tree No. 4 is a valley oak with a 12-inch dbh. The height and canopy spread were estimated at 30 feet and 20 feet, respectively (Photo 3). This oak received a rating of 3 for condition as it has included bark. Included bark tissue often develops where two or more stems grow closely together, causing weak, under-supported branch angles. Bark often grows around the branching stem attachment and into the union between the two stems. Bark has no strong supportive fiber strength as wood does, so the connection is much weaker than a union without included bark. The tree also has an oak pit scale infestation causing stress. Oak pit scales are insects that suck juices from soft tissue and new growth and cause twig dieback. This condition can be treated by proper pesticide application. By eradicating the pit scale and proper trimming, this tree can remain. $WWDFKPHQW
Attachment 6
Althouse and Meade, Inc. 1340.01
Tree Evaluation Letter Report for Habitat for 5175 Airport Road, City of Paso Robles March 2022
Photo 3. Tree No.4, 5, and 6,
view east. These trees will
remain because the
proposed parking area is
designed to accommodate
these three oaks. February
9, 2022.
Tree No. 5
Tree No. 5 is a valley oak with a 22-inch dbh. The height and canopy spread were estimated at 32 feet and 28 feet, respectively. This tree received a rating of 4 for condition. This oak also has included bark at some of the branching attachments. This tree will need trimming for clearance, some selective thinning of branches, and can remain.
Tree No. 6
Tree No. 6 is a valley Oak with a 17-inch dbh. The height and canopy spread were estimated at 32 feet and 30 feet, respectively. This oak received a rating of a 4 for condition. It also has pit scale insect infestation. The pit scale infestation can be treated. The tree will need trimming for clearance, some selective thinning of branches, and can remain. ,PSDFW'LVFXVVLRQ
For this impact discussion, CRZ is defined as the area using a radius of one foot per one-inch dbh.
Table 3 and Figure 3 provides an overview of each tree location and type of impact based on review of the Site Plan (Ward Architects, 3/22/2022). The locations of all assessed trees will be impacted with Trees No. 1, 2 and 3 to be removed completely (100 percent). The total dbh of removed trees is equivalent to 102 inches.
The existing ground surface within the CRZ of any oak tree shall not be cut, filled, compacted or pared. Excavation adjacent to any oak tree shall not be permitted where damage to the root system will result (City 2002). As indicated in the Site Plan, 3 oak trees will have minor CRZ impacts.
Tree #5
Tree #4
Tree #6
$WWDFKPHQW
Attachment 6
Althouse and Meade, Inc. 1340.01
Tree Evaluation Letter Report for Habitat for 5175 Airport Road, City of Paso Robles March 2022
7$%/( 2$.75((,03$&76
Tag # Species CRZ (ft.) Percent Impact Type of Impact
1 Q. lobata 25 100 Removal
2 Q. lobata 4/6 100 Removal
3 Q. lobata 67 100 Removal
4 Q. lobata 12 0 Remain
5 Q. lobata 22 0 Remain
6 Q. lobata 17 0 Remain
No protective measures are required for individual trees slated for removal; however, protected trees in the project area will require additional protective measures during any tree removal and construction activities. The Tree Protection Zone (TPZ) for protected trees shall be designated on construction plans to identify areas where trees are to be preserved and where special care is necessary to protect living trees. Tree protection fencing will be installed as per construction plans and will be maintained throughout construction. For work within the TPZ, tree removal and construction means and methods must be approved by the project Arborist prior to initiating work.
Work within the TPZ will be subject to monitoring by the project Arborist. The TPZ should be outside the CRZ whenever possible.
Note that root systems of trees, depending on the species, may extend well beyond the canopy dripline and maybe two to three times beyond the CRZ. Any disturbance inside this area can cause damage to tree roots. In addition, nearby trenching, paving, or altering drainage patterns outside the immediate CRZ may also significantly affect a tree.
Tree No. 1 and 2 are growing along Airport Road under overhead power lines. Airport Road is to be widened to accommodate a center turn lane, which will impact the critical root zone of Tree No.1 by >30 percent. In addition, the overhead power lines are to be moved underground.
New utilities, sewer, and water will also be installed and significantly impact the critical root zones of Trees No.1 and 2. Therefore, these oaks are proposed for removal due to the construction impacts of road widening and new utility installations.
Tree No. 3 is in poor condition and is in the proposed parking lot area. Therefore, this oak is proposed for removal.
Tree No. 4, 5, and 6 are to remain. The parking area was designed to accommodate these three oaks. There are pipes and electrical associated with an old well and water tank close to these three oaks that must be capped off at ground level. Its recommended that the water tank and concrete foundation remains in place, as there will be much less impact on these trees than trying to work around the trees to remove the tank and foundation. The project Arborist needs to be onsite for any excavation and grading in the CRZ of these three oaks this includes potential removal of the water tank and concrete foundation.
0LWLJDWLRQ5HFRPPHQGDWLRQV
Oak trees removed by the project shall be replaced in accordance with the City’s Oak Tree Preservation Ordinance. Planting small trees in quantity to account for the mitigated dbh $WWDFKPHQW
Attachment 6
Althouse and Meade, Inc. 1340.01
Tree Evaluation Letter Report for Habitat for 5175 Airport Road, City of Paso Robles March 2022
equivalency will satisfy this requirement. Mitigation for the removal of three oak trees (Tree No.1, 2, and 3) is 25 percent of the total dbh (102-inches), equivalent to 25.5-inches in caliper for oak replacement trees. Rounding this to 26 (or nine, 3-inch caliper valley oaks). Mitigation trees are described by their diameter measured as “caliper”. American Horticulture describes this measurement for trees larger than seedling size:
“caliper measurement shall be taken six inches above the ground level for field grown stock and from the soil line for container grown stock, which should be at or near the top of the root flare, and six inches above the root flare for bare root plants, up to and including the four-inch caliper size interval (i.e., from four inches up to, but not including, 4½ inches). If the caliper measured at six inches is four and one-half inches or more, the caliper shall be measured at 12 inches above the ground level, soil line, or root flare, as appropriate. Seldom are tree trunks perfectly round.
The most accurate measurement will result from the use of a diameter tape. Caliper measurements taken with manual or electronic “slot” or “pincer” type caliper tools should be the average of the smallest and largest measurements.”
Mitigation for removed oaks could be satisfied by planting a combination 1- inch, 1.5-inch or 3- inch caliper trees so long as the total combination totals 26 inches (e.g., nine 3-inch caliper oaks, seventeen 1.5-inch caliper oaks, or a combination depending on availability). Suppose replacement caliper trees of appropriate size are not available as specified in the mitigation measure. In that case, smaller replacement trees in higher quantities deemed acceptable by the City may be planted.
Mitigation trees shall be sourced from California’s central coast region.
The landscape plan includes nine valley oaks of 3-inch caliper size, equivalent to 36-inch box trees to be planted on the site to satisfy mitigation requirements. A copy of the Landscape Plan is provided in Attachment 1.
Tree Protection Zone Restrictions for Trees No. 4, 5 and 6 x No ground disturbance, grading, trenching, construction activities or structural development shall occur within the tree protection zone (TPZ; e.g., the dripline of protected trees) except as specifically authorized by the project's development permit and Project Arborist. x Setbacks for TPZ fencing may be adjusted under guidance of the Project Arborist. x All temporary vehicle and equipment access areas within TPZ boundaries will require a minimum 6-inch layer of wood chip mulch to mitigate soil compaction over the critical root zone (CRZ). Additionally, the Project Arborist may require the addition of plywood or rubber mats over the mulch in frequently traveled sensitive areas. x No equipment, soil, or construction materials shall be placed, staged, or stored within the TPZ.
No oil, gasoline, chemicals, paints, solvents, or other damaging materials shall be deposited within the TPZ or in drainage channels, swales or areas that may lead to theTPZ. x Unless otherwise directed by the Project Arborist, all work done within the TPZ, including digging, trenching and planting, shall be done with hand tools or small hand-held power tools that are of a depth and design that will not cause root damage. x Where trenching or digging within the TPZ is specifically permitted, the work shall be conducted in a manner that minimizes root damage, as directed by the Arborist. All roots larger than 1-inch in diameter shall be clean cut with sharp pruning tools and not left ragged. $WWDFKPHQW
Attachment 6
Althouse and Meade, Inc. 1340.01
Tree Evaluation Letter Report for Habitat for 5175 Airport Road, City of Paso Robles March 2022
x Any exposed roots shall be re-covered with soil the same day they were exposed if possible.
If they cannot, they must be covered with burlap or another suitable material and wet down 2 times per day until reburied.
x Grade changes outside of the TPZ shall not significantly alter drainage to protected trees.
Grading within the TPZ shall use methods that minimize root damage and ensure that roots are not cut off from air. Where erosion may be a factor, return and protect the original grade or otherwise stabilize the soil.
x Protected trees shall not be used for posting signs, electrical wires or pulleys; for supporting structures; and shall be kept free of nails, screws, rope, wires, stakes and any other unauthorized fastening devices or attachments.
Tree Protection Fencing
Fencing shall be temporary, readily visible, orange snow drift/construction fencing, and a minimum of 4-feet high. Fencing shall be secured to 6-foot t-posts, driven into the ground by 12 inches, and placed at intervals of 8 feet minimum. Fencing can be fastened to the t-posts with bailing wire or zip ties. Fencing shall be installed outside the CRZ unless modifications are approved by the Project Arborists. Fencing shall effectively: 1) keep the foliage, crown, branch structure and trunk clear from damage by equipment, materials or disturbances; 2) preserve roots and soil in an intact and non- compacted state; and 3) identify the TPZ. Fencing shall be maintained for the duration of construction. Fencing shall be removed as the last item of contract work.
Signs
One English language and one Spanish language, readily visible, durable, waterproof sign shall be installed on tree protection fences in 4 equidistant locations around each individual protected tree or tree clusters. Signs placed on fencing around a stand of protected trees shall be placed at approximately 50- foot intervals. The size of each sign must be a minimum of 16 inches wide and must contain the wording below. The lettering in the word "WARNING" ("ADVERTENCIA") must be in capital letters at least 2 inches in height; the phrase "TREE PROTECTION ZONE" ("ZONA DE PROTECCIÓN DE ÁRBOLES") must be in capital letters at least 1 inch in height; all other lettering must be at least ½ inch in size.
Other Recommendations
x Preconstruction. If construction is planned to occur between February 1 and September 15, a qualified biologist shall survey both Project trees and vegetation within 100 feet of Project area for nesting birds (300 feet for raptors) within one week of construction activities. If nesting birds are present the biologist will coordinate with Project manager to minimize impacts to nesting birds.
x During Construction. An Arborist shall determine when to be onsite to monitor all grubbing, trenching, digging, and grading during construction activities within the TPZ. If required, the Arborist shall inform the City of Paso Robles Community Development Department when tree protective fencing may be removed.
x Unanticipated Tree Damage Reporting. In the event that unanticipated or unauthorized impacts are inflicted on protected trees, the Project Arborist shall be immediately notified. The Project Arborist shall inspect damaged trees and prepare unanticipated damage reports with remediation recommendations to the Project Manager. Any damage or wounds to a tree shall $WWDFKPHQW
Attachment 6
Althouse and Meade, Inc. 1340.01
Tree Evaluation Letter Report for Habitat for 5175 Airport Road, City of Paso Robles
March 2022
be corrected within 24 hours of notification by a certified Arborist using International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) guidelines.
x Post-Construction Arborist Monitoring and Reporting. Post-construction monitoring and reporting will be performed by the Arborist as required by the City of Paso Robles.
Thank you for allowing us to be of assistance. If you have any questions or concerns, please call me or Valerie Mattos at (805) 237-9626.
Sincerely,
Cory Meyer
Certified Arborist, ISA Certification No. WE 7678-A
)LJXUHV
x )LJXUH86*67RSRJUDSKLF0DS
x )LJXUH7UHH6XUYH\
x )LJXUH7UHH,PSDFWV
$WWDFKPHQW3UHOLPLQDU\7UHH3ODQ
:DUG$UFKLWHFWV
$WWDFKPHQW
Attachment 6
/HJHQG
3URMHFW/RFDWLRQ
0DS8SGDWHG
BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES )HEUXDU\ 30E\6$)
ALTHOUSE AND MEADE, INC.
)HHW ±
$LUSRUW5RDG
0DS&HQWHU
:1
3DVR5REOHV6DQ/XLV2ELVSR&RXQW\
86*64XDGUDQJOH
3DVR5REOHV
)LJXUH8QLWHG6WDWHV*HRORJLFDO6XUYH\7RSRJUDSKLF0DS 6DFUDPHQWR
6DQ)UDQFLVFR
)UHVQR
/RV$QJHOHV
/DV9HJDV
*
?VWUDYLQVNL$LUSRUW5RDG?DSU[?DUERULVW5HSRUWDSU[
/D\RXW
7RSR
0DS
$WWDFKPHQW
Attachment 6
7UHH
'%+
LQ
7UHH
'%+
LQ
7UHH
'%+
LQ 7UHH
'%+
LQ
7UHH
'%+
LQ
7UHH
'%+
LQ
/HJHQG
3URSHUW\
DFUHV
9DOOH\2DN
Quercus lobata
&ULWLFDO5RRW=RQH
0DS8SGDWHG
0DUFK
30E\6$)
A
BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
LTHOUSE AND MEADE, INC.
± )HHW
)LJXUH7UHH6XUYH\
*
?VWUDYLQVNL$LUSRUW5RDG?DSU[?DUERULVW5HSRUWDSU[
/D\RXW
)LJXUH7UHH6XUYH\
0DS
7UHH6XUYH\
$LUSRUW5RDG
0DS&HQWHU
:1
3DVR5REOHV6DQ/XLV2ELVSR&RXQW\
,PDJHU\6RXUFH
(65,:RUOG,PDJHU\
$LUSRUW5RDG
$WWDFKPHQW
Attachment 6
7UHH
'%+
LQ
7UHH
'%+
LQ
7UHH
'%+
LQ
7UHH
'%+
LQ
7UHH
'%+
LQ
7UHH
'%+
LQ
/HJHQG
3URSHUW\%RXQGDU\
7UHH3URWHFWLRQ)HQFLQJ
6LWH3ODQ
2DN,PSDFW6WDWXV
5HPRYHG
3URWHFWHG
0DS8SGDWHG
BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 0DUFK 30E\6$)
ALTHOUSE AND MEADE, INC.
± )HHW
)LJXUH7UHH,PSDFWV
*
?VWUDYLQVNL$LUSRUW5RDG?DSU[?DUERULVW5HSRUWDSU[
/D\RXW
)LJXUH7UHH,PSDFWV
3RUWUDLW
0DS
7UHH,PSDFWV
$LUSRUW5RDG
0DS&HQWHU
:1
3DVR5REOHV6DQ/XLV2ELVSR&RXQW\
,PDJHU\6RXUFH
(65,:RUOG,PDJHU\$LUSRUW5RDG
'LVWULEXWLRQ
&HQWHU
%LRUHWHQWLRQ
'HWHQWLRQ3RQG
:DUG$UFKLWHFWV,QF
$WWDFKPHQW
Attachment 6
Althouse and Meade, Inc. 1340.01
Tree Evaluation Letter Report for Habitat for 5175 Airport Road, City of Paso Robles March 2022
$WWDFKPHQW3UHOLPLQDU\7UHH3ODQ
:DUG$UFKLWHFWV
$WWDFKPHQW
Attachment 6
121,55,*$7('
+<'526(('0,;21321'%27720
6,'(67<3
3/$17,1*$5($7<3
3/$17,1*$5($7<3
3/$17,1*$5($7<3
121,55,*$7('+<'526(('0,;21
6:$/(%27720
6,'(67<3
3/$17,1*$5($7<3 75((6((/(*(1'
;
75$6+
(1&/2685(7<3
3/$17,1*$5($7<3,&$/
&/)(1&($5281'321'
3523(57</,1(
%,25(7(17,21'(7(17,21321'
3523(57</,1(
%,.(5$&.
3523(57</,1(
/,*+767$1'$5'7<3,&$/
%,.(5$&.
$,5325752$'
3523(57</,1(
$///$1'6&$3($5($66+$//%(,55,*$7('
121,55,*$7('+<'526(('0,;21
6:$/(%27720
6,'(67<3
(;,67,1*2$.75((672%(5(029('
121,55,*$7('+<'526(('0,;21
6:$/(%27720
6,'(67<3
(;,67,1*2$.75((63527(&7,13/$&(3(5&,7<2)3$6252%/(675((35(6(59$7,2125',1$1&( 75((6((/(*(1'
(;,67,1*2$.75((72%(5(029('
0DUFK
ZZZZDUGDUFKLWHFWVFRP
:<RVHPLWH6XLWH
0DGHUD&$
$LUSRUW5RDG
3DVR5REOHV&$
$31
0DGHUD&$
:<RVHPLWH6XLWH
&RHXUG
$OHQH,GDKR
32%R[
3KRQH
DUFKLWHFWXUH_ODQGVFDSHDUFKLWHFWXUH
35(/,0,1$5<
/
35(/,0,1$5</$1'6&$3(3/$1
75((3/$1
$WWDFKPHQW
Attachment 6
0DUFK
ZZZZDUGDUFKLWHFWVFRP
:<RVHPLWH6XLWH
0DGHUD&$
$LUSRUW5RDG
3DVR5REOHV&$
$31
0DGHUD&$
:<RVHPLWH6XLWH
&RHXUG
$OHQH,GDKR
32%R[
3KRQH
DUFKLWHFWXUH_ODQGVFDSHDUFKLWHFWXUH
75(( 6+58%
3/$17,1*/(*(1'
$WWDFKPHQW
Attachment
/
6 45dB Acoustics, LLC
www.45dB.com
(805) 250-1566
PO Box 1717
Buellton, CA 93427
This report (including any enclosures and attachments) has been prepared for the exclusive use and benefit of the addressee(s) and solely for the purpose for which it is provided. No part of this report shall be reproduced, distributed, or communicated to any third party without written permission. We do not accept any liability if this report is used for an alternative purpose from which it is intended, nor to any third party
May 31, 2022
45dB Project # 22028
Acoustical Analysis:
Wine Distribution Center
5175 Airport Rd.
Paso Robles, CA 93446
Requested by:
MW Architects
Attn: CJ Horstman
[email protected]
Client/Owner:
Stravinsky Development Group, Inc.
Attn: Neil Thompson
413 W. Yosemite Ave. Ste 105
Madera, CA 93637
1 Summary
45dB Acoustics (“45dB”) has reviewed the applicable noise-related regulations for this wine distribution warehouse center at the above address in the City of Paso Robles, bordering San Luis Obispo County. Residences exist to the immediate north and west of the project, within the County of San Luis Obispo. Properties in the other directions are commercial land uses and exist within either the County, or the City of Paso Robles.
Modeled noise levels across the site range from below CNEL 40 at the west side to 75 dBA at the east side along Airport Road. Road traffic noise from Airport Road is the principal noise source for the area.
Utilizing measurements reported by another acoustics consultant from an existing similar facility, the proposed project was modeled using 3D noise propagation software SoundPLAN® to analyze the potential noise impact on the neighboring land uses. Noise levels associated with the project are anticipated to comprise of: one HVAC unit at the north elevation for the offices of the warehouse; a warehouse chiller; and the noise associated with the truck traffic and loading at the shipping docks. Refrigerated trucks are not expected and were not included as a noise source.
The proposed project is anticipated to increase the hourly LAeq and CNEL/Ldn sound levels for this site by less than 1 dB, except for at 5215 Airport Road where (hourly and CNEL) levels increase up to 3 dB. If indeed the dwelling at 5215 Airport Road is a residential use to which the noise regulations apply mitigating berm of 7 feet in height and 190 feet long along the northern property line as described herein is needed to mitigate only this property. for 45dB Acoustics, LLC:
Sarah Taubitz, ASA, INCE
Attachment 8
Attachment 6
45dB Acoustics, LLC 5175 Airport Rd.
page ii noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact www.45dB.com Contents
1 Summary .............................................................................................................................................................. i 2 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 3 Applicable Regulations ...................................................................................................................................... 2
3.1 Commercial/Industrial Land Uses (City of Paso Robles) ............................................................................... 2
3.2 Residences (San Luis Obispo County) ............................................................................................................. 2 4 Existing Site Ambient Sound Levels ................................................................................................................. 6 5 Predicted Sound Levels with Project ................................................................................................................ 7
5.1 Warehouse Shipping Activity (Northern Side of Project) ................................................................................ 7
5.2 Office HVAC Unit (North Elevation) .............................................................................................................. 8
5.3 Warehouse Chiller (South Elevation) .............................................................................................................. 9 6 Evaluation and Recommendations ................................................................................................................... 9
6.1 Recommended Mitigation .............................................................................................................................. 10 7 Figures ............................................................................................................................................................... 11 8 Appendix ........................................................................................................................................................... 23
8.1 Characteristics of Sound ............................................................................................................................... 23
8.2 Terminology/Glossary ................................................................................................................................... 24
8.3 SoundPLAN Acoustics Software .................................................................................................................... 26
8.3.1 ISO 9613-2........................................................................................................................................... 26
8.3.2 Traffic Noise Model............................................................................................................................. 26 Figures
FIGURE 1: AERIAL MAP OF SITE SURROUNDINGS AND MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS ..........................................................................11 FIGURE 2: PROJECT SITE PLAN .............................................................................................................................................12 FIGURE 3: SOUND LEVEL METER “LTͲ2” ON WOODEN POST NEAR PROJECT’S NORTHERN PROPERTY LINE (FACING ENE) .......................13 FIGURE 4: 24ͲHOUR NOISE LEVELS AT PROJECT SITE.................................................................................................................14 FIGURE 5: GENERAL PASO ROBLES, CA WEATHER FOR MAY 6, 2022 (AFTER WEATHERUNDERGROUND.COM) ...................................15 FIGURE 6: GENERAL PASO ROBLES, CA WEATHER FOR MAY 7, 2022 (AFTER WEATHERUNDERGROUND.COM) ...................................16 FIGURE 7: DAYTIME (“LD”) SOUND LEVEL CONTOURS, EXISTING AREA.........................................................................................18 FIGURE 8: 3D VIEW OF SITE GEOMETRY, INCLUDING PROPOSED PROJECT .....................................................................................19 FIGURE 9: DAYTIME (“LD”) SOUND LEVEL CONTOURS, WITH PROPOSED PROJECT ..........................................................................20 FIGURE 10: DAYTIME (“LD”) SOUND LEVEL CONTOURS WITH MITIGATING NOISE BERM ..................................................................21 FIGURE 11: PLACEMENT AND MINIMUM LENGTH OF MITIGATION BERM ......................................................................................22
Attachment 8
Attachment 6
45dB Acoustics, LLC 5175 Airport Rd.
page iii noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact www.45dB.com Tables
TABLE 1 PASO ROBLES’ NOISE ELEMENT STANDARDS FOR NONͲTRANSPORTATION SOURCES (REPRINTED) ..........................................4 TABLE 2: COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO NOISE ELEMENT MAXIMUM NOISE EXPOSURE DUE TO STATIONARY NOISE SOURCES.................5 TABLE 3: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY MUNICIPAL CODE EXTERIOR NOISE LEVEL STANDARDS .............................................................6 TABLE 4: SOUND LEVELS AT RECEIVERS OF INTEREST ...............................................................................................................10 TABLE 5: YORK CHILLER NOISE SPECIFICATION ........................................................................................................................17 TABLE 6: SOUND LEVEL CHANGE RELATIVE LOUDNESS/ACOUSTIC ENERGY LOSS...........................................................................23 Attachment 8
Attachment 6
45dB Acoustics, LLC 5175 Airport Rd.
page 1 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact www.45dB.com 2 Introduction
This sound level assessment and analysis was carried out to determine the noise impacts associated with the proposed wine distribution center. 45dB Acoustics, LLC (“45dB”) has predicted sound levels across the site, performed on-site ambient sound measurements, and evaluated the project’s suitability in reference to local regulations. Neighboring properties— particularly the residence to the immediate north within the County—have been considered. The following factors are also considered:
y The topographical relationship of potential noise sources and the dwelling site y Identification of noise sources and their characteristics, including predicted sound levels at the exterior of the proposed dwelling, considering present and future land usage
y Basis for the sound level prediction—for this project, acoustically modeled from published data—noise attenuation measures to be applied, and an analysis of the noise insulation effectiveness of the proposed construction showing that the prescribed interior noise level requirements are met
y Information on fundamentals of noise and vibration to aid in interpreting the report The project would replace a currently unoccupied residence located in the City of Paso de Robles, with the San Luis Obispo County line at the northern property line. An occupied home/dwelling located immediately north, within the County, just across the project’s northern property line (Figure 1). A commercial business (JW Welding) is planned to the immediate south, while a residential home at 1245 Mission St is located on the opposite (south) side of the project.
The project is planned to have the following operations, per the Client:
“Hours of operation for the storage and distribution functions are normally 8 AM to 5 PM Monday thru Friday during the months of January, February, the first half of March, June, July and the first half of August and 6 AM to 8 PM Monday thru Friday (with some Saturdays) during peak seasonal months of the last half of March, April, May, last half of August, September, October, November and December. The tenant projects a total employee count of 20 during the low season months ramping up to 30 employees during the high season months.
Trucking deliveries and shipping movements are usually between the hours of 9 AM and 3 PM Monday through Friday and never before 8 AM nor later than 5 PM and never on the weekends.”
For the purposes of an acoustic study, with trucks as the dominant noise source on site, the operating hours of 8am to 5pm on weekdays were utilized for a conservative analysis. Most days and times of the year will have substantially less noise emitting from the proposed warehouse project.
Attachment 8
Attachment 6
45dB Acoustics, LLC 5175 Airport Rd.
page 2 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact www.45dB.com 3 Applicable Regulations
Throughout this document, noise level limits and levels are assumed to be A-weighted decibel levels.
The County border forms the northern boundary of the property.
The project itself is located within City of Paso Robles. For commercial and industrial land uses, The City of Paso Robles’ exterior noise standards for locally regulated noise sources are 60 dBA LAeq and 80 Lmax during daytime hours, and 55 dBA LAeq and 75 LAmax during evening hours, reprinted in Table 1. Daytime hours are defined as 7am to 7pm, while evening is 7pm to 10pm. Nighttime limits are not defined for this land use because commercial and industrial properties are assumed to be unoccupied at night.
3.1 Commercial/Industrial Land Uses (City of Paso Robles) A welding company is planned to share the project’s southern property line. The Paso Robles Regional Airport is further to the east, beyond several commercial uses along the east side of Airport Road. Paso Robles Wine Services, another wine distribution warehouse center similar to the proposed project, is located southwest of the project site. A construction company’s offices are located to the immediate south of the project site. These land uses are highlighted yellow in Figure 1.
Approximately 1,000 ft to the north of the property site sits the Estrella Adobe Church (5660 Airport Road) and, although churches are also potential sensitive receptors, if the project is compliant or sufficiently mitigated for the home at 5215 Airport Road, then it will also be compliant with the Estrella Adobe Church.
3.2 Residences (San Luis Obispo County)
The nearest potentially sensitive noise receptors evaluated in this study are the residential homes/dwellings—even those on agriculturally zoned land—at:
x 5215 Airport Road, in the County of San Luis Obispo, with home/dwelling approximately 43 feet from the project’s northern property line x 6065 Buena Vista Drive, in the County of San Luis Obispo x 6240 Buena Vista Drive, in the County of San Luis Obispo x 6055-6065 Buena Vista Drive, in the County of San Luis Obispo The above residences are highlighted blue in Figure 1.
San Luis Obispo County’s Noise Element of the General Plan provides maximum noise exposure due to stationary (i.e., non-transit sources), reprinted in Table 2. For residential uses, this is 50 dBA LAeq and 70 LAmax during daytime hours, and 45 dBA LAeq and 65 dBA LAmax during nighttime hours. Daytime is defined as 7am to 10pm. These limits are to be evaluated at the receiving land use property line.
Attachment 8
Attachment 6
45dB Acoustics, LLC 5175 Airport Rd.
page 3 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact www.45dB.com Table 3 shows the County’s exterior noise level limits within the Municipal Code. The limits match those within the Noise Element. Note 2 states that if the existing ambient exceeds these levels, then the applicable limits shall be the ambient plus 1 dB. We note that this means that a new noise source must be 7 dB or more below the existing ambient in order to not raise the total new noise level by more than 1 dB.
Attachment 8
Attachment 6
45dB Acoustics, LLC 5175 Airport Rd.
page 4 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact www.45dB.com Table 1 Paso Robles’ Noise Element Standards for Non-Transportation Sources (reprinted) Attachment 8
Attachment 6
45dB Acoustics, LLC 5175 Airport Rd.
page 5 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact www.45dB.com Table 2: County of San Luis Obispo Noise Element Maximum Noise Exposure Due to Stationary Noise Sources
Attachment 8
Attachment 6
45dB Acoustics, LLC 5175 Airport Rd.
page 6 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact www.45dB.com Table 3: San Luis Obispo County Municipal Code Exterior Noise Level Standards 4 Existing Site Ambient Sound Levels
A 3D geometric model of the situation is created within the noise modeling software SoundPLAN®. Buildings and main roads are modeled on the terrain to create a realistic model of the outdoor noise propagation for the area.
All sound contour plots, in plan view, are presented at a height of 1.5 m / 5 feet (AGL) within this report, and all are in units of A-weighted dB rel 20μPa for direct comparison with the applicable regulations.
Measured sound levels of the existing ambient enable for adjustment of the acoustic model if necessary. Sound levels were measured at two locations on the project site, named “LT-1”, at the property’s fence line approximately 40 ft from the centerline of Airport Road, and “LT-2” as Attachment 8
Attachment 6
45dB Acoustics, LLC 5175 Airport Rd.
page 7 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact www.45dB.com indicated in Figure 1. A photo of LT-1 is shown in Figure 3, located approximately 10 feet to the south of the existing fence line facing the northern property line. Calibrated Class 2 sound level meters (SoftdB model Piccolo II) were field calibrated before and after the measurements using a Class 1 Larson Davis CAL200 calibrator. Measurements were acquired from 3pm Friday May 6 to 3pm Saturday May 7, 2022. The data was appended into the 24-hour time series shown in Figure 4, meaning that 3pm – midnight is May 6 data, and that hours 00 to 15 (midnight to 3pm) are from May 7, 2022.
The resulting measured 24-hour Community Noise Equivalent Level, CNEL, was 75 dBA for location LT-1 near Airport Road and 65 dBA at location LT-2. There was some breeze noted by personnel while on site, and historical weather did note significant winds during the daytime hours—Figure 5 and Figure 6 weather data for May 6 and May 7, respectively, are highlighted in green to denote when measurements were occurring. (This weather data is general for the City of Paso Robles and may not be accurate for this specific project site.) The measured nighttime levels were significantly higher than would be normally expected due to traffic noise alone based upon published traffic levels from 2006 (adjusted upward to 2022 assuming 1% per year increase). The elevated nighttime levels may have been in part due to the significant birdsong in the area noted during the survey, along with elevated traffic on a Friday night. Somewhat degraded road pavement condition and traffic speeds may have also contributed to the measurement results that were approximately 3 dB higher than CNEL levels as predicted from published traffic counts alone. If road surface condition is improved through resurfacing in the future, and birdsong is reduced at these locations with the project in place, then non-project related ambient noise levels may be reduced from what was measured here.
The Federal Highway Administration’s Traffic Noise Model (TNM) calculation method is utilized to predict outdoor noise propagation from road traffic. Resulting CNEL sound level contours for the existing site are shown in Figure 7. For the residential use at 5215 Airport Road, noise levels are approximately CNEL 58 (at the western property line) to CNEL 75 (at the eastern property line along Airport Road).
Predicted Sound Levels with Project
Each project-related noise source is described in the subsections below.
4.1 Warehouse Shipping Activity (Northern Side of Project) The Client provided a noise report entitled “Lombard 151 Warehouse, American Canyon, CA Noise Technical Report, Including Sound Level Estimates for the Proposed SDG Commerce 330 Wine Storage Warehouse” by RCH Group, dated February 20, 2019. This report provided noise levels measured at an existing similar wine storage warehouse named “Lombard 151” located at 265 Lombard Street in American Canyon, CA. Their weekday measurement location of 70 feet away from the approximate middle of the active shipping dock side of the warehouse was 62-66 dBA LAeq during the daytime and 57-58 dBA LAeq during the nighttime. The resulting weekday CNEL was 66-67 dBA—though this is expected to be elevated above the daytime levels and not due to warehouse-related noise but rather due to distant traffic and railroad activities.
Attachment 8
Attachment 6
45dB Acoustics, LLC 5175 Airport Rd.
page 8 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact www.45dB.com The RCH Group’s report for the Lombard 151 project noted:
“The following observations were made regarding the noise environment at this location:
• The site had minimal activity when the RCH noise analyst was on-site. • Trucks that used the site made a variety of noises while at the site, including:
truck idling, break pressure adjustments, and back-up beepers. Trucks shut down their engines when loading and off-loading.
• Some off-site noise reaches the project site and would add to the total site noise.
• The loudest on-site noise observed was from weed whackers and leaf blowers that were used to maintain the vegetation at the edge of the loading dock area on February 5th.
• The Lombard 151 Warehouse property site is just south and adjacent to a train cars storage area and there was occasional noise from activities in the train storage area
• There were no noise sources at the south of the building, it is mainly a block wall. The measured noise was primarily from other non-ambient noise sources from further south and east and west, such as distant noise from Highway 29.
The Lombard 151 Warehouse building was a barrier to all the noise sources on the north side of the building.”
In our model of the proposed warehouse at 5175 Airport Road, the combination of a linear noise source representing medium and heavy (semi) truck operations, along with an area noise source applied to the northern elevation of the building, were adjusted to match the median daytime reported sound level of 64 dBA LAeq as reported for the Lombard Street site. There was some degree of train noise and distant highway noise in the measurements made for the Lombard Street, we can reasonably assume that those measured levels are conservatively high as compared to the levels that can be anticipated at the 5175 Airport Road site, presuming similar warehouse capacity and activity. Shipping dock and related truck traffic was assumed for the hours of 8am to 3pm on weekdays. A low level of traffic within the parking lot is assumed to exist from 6am to 8pm—so, within a few “nighttime hours” before and after the main shipping activity hours. We assume no on-site activity during weekends.
Refrigerated semi-trailer trucks can be problematic for noise, as the refrigerator units for the containers tend to be high level, low-frequency tonal, and are located at a higher height toward the top of the truck containers. The Client reported that refrigerated trucks are not anticipated at this site.
4.2 Office HVAC Unit (North Elevation)
According to the Client, a 3- to 4-ton compressor type air-conditioning unit is planned to be located at the “Office HVAC Pad”, close to the northern elevation of the building, near the bike rack and entrance to the facility. Although a model is not yet selected, based upon our experience with this equipment, we assumed a sound power level (“LWA”) of approximately 86 dBA rel 10- 12 W, corresponding to a sound pressure level of 75 dBA rel 20μPa at a distance of 1 meter.
Attachment 8
Attachment 6
45dB Acoustics, LLC 5175 Airport Rd.
page 9 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact www.45dB.com
4.3 Warehouse Chiller (South Elevation)
A warehouse chiller is planned to be located in an equipment yard at the southern elevation of the proposed warehouse near Airport Road, facing the commercial land located to the south, (planned to be a welding company). A 72.25-ton, 100kW compressor, liquid-refrigerant York Chiller set, with Sound Power Levels as shown in Table 5, were included in the model and analysis. The sound power level at 100% load of 94 dBA was assumed for 24/7 operation for a conservative analysis.
5 Evaluation and Recommendations
All sound levels are in A-weighted decibel units to compare directly with applicable regulations.
Results will accordingly show decibels with a precision of one-tenth of a decibel for evaluation purposes only; a change of 0.1 dB is entirely too small a change to be discerned by the human ear.
The sound level contours are provided for visualization purposes inshows resulting sound levels during daytime hours. For proposed new sources of noise that are not anticipated to operate at night, the daytime sound levels are the most appropriate Daytime hourly sound levels are the primary metric to evaluate since the distribution activities of the warehouse primarily occur during daytime hours. The related maximum (“Lmax or “LAmax”) limits within the regulations do also apply while evaluating any proposed project. Maximum short-duration noises for this project include mainly the backup beeps from trucks while parking. We anticipate that backup noises are within 20dB above the hourly LAeq levels from the trucking activities, such that if the hourly LAeq levels for the site comply, then the maximum levels for the site will also comply with the applicable regulations. We assume trucks will not idle while parked.
The warehouse itself provides mitigation from Airport Road traffic noise to the homes to the west of the project site, e.g., “Home 2”. If a warehouse chiller louder than the 94 dBA @ 100% load York model (discussed previously in Section 4.3) is placed at the southern elevation, a mitigating solidly-constructed noise barrier wall (e.g., CMU block, stucco on studs) would need to be added there to mitigate for land uses to the south.
Although the land to the immediate north of the project is zoned agricultural according to County records, for this study we assume that the home located at 5215 Airport Road is a residential use and that residential noise limits must be respected. As was previously stated, if road surface condition is improved through resurfacing in the future, and birdsong is reduced at these locations with the project in place, then non-project related ambient noise levels may be reduced from what was measured here, which only serves to reinforce a need for mitigation for a residential use at 5215 Airport Road.
Attachment 8
Attachment 6
45dB Acoustics, LLC 5175 Airport Rd.
page 10 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact www.45dB.com Table 4: Sound Levels at Receivers of Interest
Receiver
Existing
CNEL/Ldn
Ambient
(dBA)
Existing
Daytime
Hourly
Ambient Leq,d
(dBA)
With Project
Daytime
Ambient
Leq,d (dBA)
Anticipated
Daytime
Change (dB)
With
BermͲMitigated
Project Daytime
Ambient Leq,d
(dBA)
Anticipated
Mitigated
Daytime
Change (dB)
Home 1,
SW corner of lot 59.3 57.9 60.6 +2.7 58.3 +0.4
Home 2 42.9 41.4 41.4 0 Ͳ Ͳ
G Weimann
Construction 56.9 55.5 55.5 0 Ͳ Ͳ
5.1 Recommended Mitigation
The proposed project would increase levels at 5215 Airport Road southern property line by up to approximately 3 dB (Figure 4). As the County Municipal Code limits increases to 1 dB or less, the project noise emission from the north side of the project would require mitigation, assuming that the County noise code applies to the dwelling at 5215 Airport Road.
Ideal mitigation is provided by a noise wall or berm of at least 7ft in height. The berm must start at the eastern setback, as planned, and extend a minimum of 210 ft (64m) straight westward along the project’s northern property line. The berm is depicted in the sketch in Figure 11.
Construction noise of the project is assumed to be contained within the hours of 7am to 9pm and only on weekdays, per the County’s Noise Standards (Section 22.10.120). We also note that the City of Paso Robles states: “Construction and demolition activities located within one thousand feet of noise-sensitive land uses provided they occur during normal daytime hours, excluding Sundays and federal holidays, subject to the conditions imposed by city permit. For construction activities, daytime hours are defined as seven a.m. to seven p.m. imparts reduced hours of 7am to 7pm for construction activities. Construction activities occurring between the hours of seven p.m. and seven a.m. must comply with the interior noise level standards identified in Table 1 unless an exception has been granted by the city planning department. An exception for concrete pours or other construction activities requiring an early morning start time may be authorized by the community development director.”.
We do not anticipate any significant groundborne vibration from the finished project.
The conclusions and recommendations of this acoustical analysis are based upon the information known to 45dB Acoustics, LLC (“45dB”) at the time the analysis was prepared concerning the proposed site plans, traffic volumes, and proposed event types. Any significant changes to these factors will require a reevaluation of the findings of this report. Additionally, any significant future changes in site plan, noise regulations, or other factors beyond 45dB’s control may result in long-term noise results that differ from those described by this analysis.
Attachment 8
Attachment 6
45dB Acoustics, LLC 5175 Airport Rd.
page 11 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact www.45dB.com 6 Figures
Figure 1: Aerial map of site surroundings and measurement locations Attachment 8
Attachment 6
45dB Acoustics, LLC 5175 Airport Rd.
page 12 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact www.45dB.com Figure 2: Project site plan
Attachment 8
Attachment 6
45dB Acoustics, LLC 5175 Airport Rd.
page 13 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact www.45dB.com Figure 3: Sound level meter “LT-2” on wooden post near project’s northern property line (facing ENE) Attachment 8
Attachment 6
45dB Acoustics, LLC 5175 Airport Rd.
page 14 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact www.45dB.com Figure 4: 24-hour noise levels at project site
Attachment 8
Attachment 6
45dB Acoustics, LLC 5175 Airport Rd.
page 15 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact www.45dB.com Figure 5: General Paso Robles, CA weather for May 6, 2022 (after weatherunderground.com) Attachment 8
Attachment 6
45dB Acoustics, LLC 5175 Airport Rd.
page 16 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact www.45dB.com Figure 6: General Paso Robles, CA weather for May 7, 2022 (after weatherunderground.com) Attachment 8
Attachment 6
45dB Acoustics, LLC 5175 Airport Rd.
page 17 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact www.45dB.com Table 5: York Chiller noise specification
Attachment 8
Attachment 6
45dB Acoustics, LLC 5175 Airport Rd.
page 18 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact www.45dB.com Figure 7: Daytime (“Ld”) sound level contours, existing area Attachment 8
Attachment 6
45dB Acoustics, LLC 5175 Airport Rd.
page 19 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact www.45dB.com Figure 8: 3D view of site geometry, including proposed project Attachment 8
Attachment 6
45dB Acoustics, LLC 5175 Airport Rd.
page 20 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact www.45dB.com Figure 9: Daytime (“Ld”) sound level contours, with proposed project Attachment 8
Attachment 6
45dB Acoustics, LLC 5175 Airport Rd.
page 21 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact www.45dB.com Figure 10: Daytime (“Ld”) sound level contours with mitigating noise berm at dwelling Attachment 8
Attachment 6
45dB Acoustics, LLC 5175 Airport Rd.
page 22 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact www.45dB.com Figure 11: Placement and minimum length of mitigation berm Attachment 8
Attachment 6
45dB Acoustics, LLC 5175 Airport Rd.
page 23 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact www.45dB.com 7 Appendix
7.1 Characteristics of Sound
When an object vibrates, it radiates part of its energy as acoustical pressure in the form of a sound wave. Sound can be described in terms of amplitude (loudness), frequency (pitch), or duration (time). The human hearing system is not equally sensitive to sound at all frequencies.
Therefore, to approximate this human, frequency-dependent response, the A-weighted filter system is used to adjust measured sound levels. The normal range of human hearing extends from approximately 0 to 140 dBA. Unlike linear units such as inches or pounds, decibels are measured on a logarithmic scale, representing points on a sharply rising curve. Because of the physical characteristics of noise transmission and of noise perception, the relative loudness of sound does not closely match the actual amounts of sound energy. Table 6 below presents the subjective effect of changes in sound pressure levels.
Table 6: Sound Level Change Relative Loudness/Acoustic Energy Loss 0 dBA Reference 0%
-3 dBA Barely Perceptible Change 50%
-5 dBA Readily Perceptible Change 67%
-10 dBA Half as Loud 90%
-20 dBA 1/4 as Loud 99%
-30 dBA 1/8 as Loud 99.9%
Source: Highway Traffic Noise Analysis and Abatement Policy and Guidance, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Environment and Planning, Noise and Air Quality Branch, June 1995.
Sound levels are generated from a source and their decibel level decreases as the distance from that source increases. Sound dissipates exponentially with distance from the noise source. This phenomenon is known as spreading loss. Generally, sound levels from a point source will decrease by 6 dBA for each doubling of distance. Sound levels for a highway line source vary differently with distance because sound pressure waves propagate along the line and overlap at the point of measurement. A closely spaced, continuous line of vehicles along a roadway becomes a line source and produces a 3 dBA decrease in sound level for each doubling of distance. However, experimental evidence has shown that where sound from a highway propagates close to “soft” ground (e.g., plowed farmland, grass, crops, etc.), a more suitable drop-off rate to use is not 3.0 dBA but rather 4.5 dBA per distance doubling (FHWA 2010).
When sound is measured for distinct time intervals, the statistical distribution of the overall sound level during that period can be obtained. The Leq is the most common parameter associated with such measurements. The Leq metric is a single-number noise descriptor that represents the average sound level over a given period of time. For example, the L50 noise level is the level that is exceeded 50 percent of the time. This level is also the level that is exceeded 30 minutes in an hour. Similarly, the L02, L08 and L25 values are the noise levels that are exceeded 2, 8, and 25 percent of the time or 1, 5, and 15 minutes per hour. Other values typically noted during a noise survey are the Lmin and Lmax. These values represent the minimum and maximum root-mean-square noise levels obtained over the measurement period.
Attachment 8
Attachment 6
45dB Acoustics, LLC 5175 Airport Rd.
page 24 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact www.45dB.com Because community receptors are more sensitive to unwanted noise intrusion during the evening and at night, State law requires that, for planning purposes, an artificial dB increment be added to quiet-time noise levels in a 24-hour noise descriptor called the CNEL or Ldn. This increment is incorporated in the calculation of CNEL or Ldn, described earlier.
7.2 Terminology/Glossary
A-Weighted Sound Level (dBA)
The sound pressure level in decibels as measured on a sound level meter using the internationally standardized A-weighting filter or as computed from sound spectral data to which A-weighting adjustments have been made. A-weighting de-emphasizes the low and very high frequency components of the sound in a manner similar to the response of the average human ear. Aweighted sound levels correlate well with subjective reactions of people to noise and are universally used for community noise evaluations.
Air-borne Sound
Sound that travels through the air, differentiated from structure-borne sound.
Ambient Sound Level
The prevailing general sound level existing at a location or in a space, which usually consists of a composite of sounds from many sources near and far. The ambient level is typically defined by the Leq level.
Background Sound Level
The underlying, ever-present lower level noise that remains in the absence of intrusive or intermittent sounds. Distant sources, such as Traffic, typically make up the background. The background level is generally defined by the L90 percentile noise level.
Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL)
The Leq of the A-weighted noise level over a 24-hour period with a 5-dB penalty applied to noise levels between 7 p.m. and 10 p.m. and a 10-dB penalty applied to noise levels between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. CNEL is similar to Ldn.
Day-Night Sound Level (Ldn)
The Leq of the A-weighted noise level over a 24-hour period with a 10-dB penalty applied to noise levels between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. Ldn is similar to CNEL.
Decibel (dB)
The decibel is a measure on a logarithmic scale of the magnitude of a particular quantity (such as sound pressure, sound power, sound intensity) with respect to a reference quantity.
DBA or dB(A)
A-weighted sound level. The ear does not respond equally to all frequencies, and is less sensitive at low and high frequencies than it is at medium or speech range frequencies. Thus, to obtain a single number representing the sound level of a noise containing a wide range of frequencies in a manner representative of the ear’s response, it is necessary to reduce the effects of the low and high frequencies with respect to the medium frequencies. The resultant sound level is said to be A-weighted, and the units are dBA. The A-weighted sound level is also called the noise level.
Attachment 8
Attachment 6
45dB Acoustics, LLC 5175 Airport Rd.
page 25 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact www.45dB.com Energy Equivalent Level (Leq)
Because sound levels can vary markedly in intensity over a short period of time, some method for describing either the average character of the sound or the statistical behavior of the variations must be utilized. Most commonly, one describes ambient sounds in terms of an average level that has the same acoustical energy as the summation of all the time-varying events. This energy-equivalent sound/noise descriptor is called Leq. In this report, an hourly period is used.
Field Sound Transmission Class (FSTC)
A single number rating similar to STC, except that the transmission loss values used to derive the FSTC are measured in the field. All sound transmitted from the source room to the receiving room is assumed to be through the separating wall or floor-ceiling assembly.
Noise Reduction (NR)
Noise reduction is the difference between outdoor sound level and indoor sound level. It is not identical to Sound Transmission Class.
Outdoor-Indoor Transmission Class (OITC)
A single number classification, specified by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM E 1332 issued 1994), that establishes the A-weighted sound level reduction provided by building facade components (walls, doors, windows, and combinations thereof), based upon a reference sound spectrum that is an average of typical air, road, and rail transportation sources.
The OITC is the preferred rating when exterior façade components are exposed to a noise environment dominated by transportation sources. Once built, as much as a 5-point reduction in Apparent Outside-Inside Transmission Class (OITC) from the original, as-designed OITC may be expected.
Percentile Sound Level, Ln
The noise level exceeded during n percent of the measurement period, where n is a number between 0 and 100 (e.g., L10 or L90)
Sound Transmission Class (STC)
STC is a single number rating, specified by the American Society for Testing and Materials, which can be used to measure the sound insulation properties for comparing the sound transmission capability, in decibels, of interior building partitions for noise sources such as speech, radio, and television. It is used extensively for rating sound insulation characteristics of building materials and products.
Structure-Borne Sound
Sound propagating through building structure. Rapidly fluctuating elastic waves in gypsum board, joists, studs, etc.
Subjective Loudness Level
In addition to precision measurement of sound level changes, there is a subjective characteristic which describes how most people respond to sound:
x A change in sound level of 3 dBA is barely perceptible by most listeners. x A change in level of 6 dBA is clearly perceptible.
x A change of 10 dBA is perceived by most people as being twice (or half) as loud.
Attachment 8
Attachment 6
45dB Acoustics, LLC 5175 Airport Rd.
page 26 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact www.45dB.com
7.3 SoundPLAN Acoustics Software
SoundPLAN®, the software used for this acoustic analysis, is an acoustic ray-tracing program dedicated to the prediction of noise in the environment. Noise emitted by various sources propagates and disperses over a given terrain in accordance with the laws of physics. The software calculates sound attenuation of environmental noise, even over complex terrain, uneven ground conditions, and with complex obstacles. Up to three reflections for each noise source are taken into account to closely and accurately predict real-world acoustics. Worldwide, governments and engineering associations have created algorithms to calculate acoustical phenomena to standardize the assessment of physical scenarios. Accuracy has been validated in published studies to be + / - 2.7 dBA with an 85% confidence level.
7.3.1 ISO 9613-2
For industrial and other noise sources besides road traffic, SoundPLAN calculates the sound field in accordance with ISO 9613-2 “Acoustics - Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors, Part 2: General Method of Calculation.” The standard states that “this part of ISO 9613 specifies an engineering method for calculating the attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors, in order to predict the levels of environmental noise at a distance from a variety of sources. The method predicts the equivalent continuous A-weighted sound pressure level under meteorological conditions favorable to propagation from sources of known sound emissions.
These conditions are for downwind propagation under a well-developed moderate ground-based temperature inversion, such as commonly occurs at night.” Uncertainty of calculations with this method are +/-1 dB for sources less than 10m in height and within 1000m of the receiver.
7.3.2 Traffic Noise Model
The Federal Highway Administration Traffic Noise Model (TNM), implemented into the SoundPLAN® software, was used for the road traffic sound level modeling in this study. TNM contains the following components:
1. Modeling of five standard vehicle types, including automobiles, medium trucks, heavy trucks, buses, and motorcycles, as well as user-defined vehicles.
2. Modeling both constant- and interrupted-flow traffic using a field-measured data base.
3. Modeling effects of different pavement types, as well as the effects of graded roadways.
4. Sound level computations based on a one-third octave-band data base and algorithms.
5. Graphically-interactive noise barrier design and optimization.
6. Attenuation over/through rows of buildings and dense vegetation.
7. Multiple diffraction analysis.
8. Parallel barrier analysis.
9. Contour analysis, including sound level contours, barrier insertion loss contours, and sound-level difference contours.
These components are supported by a scientifically founded and experimentally calibrated acoustic computation methodology, as well as a flexible data base, made up of over 6000 individual pass-by events measured at forty sites across the country.
Attachment 8
Attachment 6
3DJH ϭ RI ϭϰ
5HVRXUFH1DPHRU
ϱϭϳϱŝƌƉŽƌƚZŽĂĚ
32WKHU,GHQWLILHU͗
'35$
5HTXLUHGLQIRUPDWLRQ
6WDWHRI&DOLIRUQLD 7KH5HVRXUFHV$JHQF\ 3ULPDU\
'(3$570(172)3$5.6$1'5(&5($7,21 +5,
35,0$5<5(&25' 7ULQRPLDO
15+36WDWXV&RGH
2WKHU/LVWLQJV
5HYLHZ&RGH 5HYLHZHU 'DWH
ΎWϮ͘>ŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͗ EŽƚĨŽƌWƵďůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ _ hŶƌĞƐƚƌŝĐƚĞĚ ΎĂ͘ ŽƵŶƚLJ ^ĂŶ>ƵŝƐKďŝƐƉŽ
Ύď͘ h^'^ϳ͘ϱΖYƵĂĚ WĂƐŽZŽďůĞƐ͕ĂůŝĨ͘ ĂƚĞϭϵϰϴ;ϭϵϴϰĞĚ͘Ϳ dϮϲ^͖ZϭϮ ͖^
ЬŽĨ^
ЬŽĨ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϭϭ͖D͘͘͘D͘
F ĚĚƌĞƐƐ ϱϭϳϱŝƌƉŽƌƚZŽĂĚ ŝƚLJ WĂƐŽZŽďůĞƐ ŝƉ ϵϯϰϰϲ G hdD͗
Ğ͘ KƚŚĞƌ>ŽĐĂƚŝŽŶĂůĂƚĂ͗ƐƐĞƐƐŽƌ͛ƐWĂƌĐĞůEƵŵďĞƌ;WEͿϬϮϱͲϰϯϰͲϬϬϮ͘&ƌŽŵƚŚĞŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶŽĨƵĞŶĂsŝƐƚĂƌŝǀĞĂŶĚŝƌƉŽƌƚ ZŽĂĚ͕ŚĞĂĚŶŽƌƚŚŽŶŝƌƉŽƌƚZŽĂĚĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞůLJϬ͘ϮϮŵŝůĞƐ;ϭ͕ϭϴϬĨĞĞƚͿƚŽƚŚĞĚƌŝǀĞǁĂLJŽĨϱϭϳϱŝƌƉŽƌƚZŽĂĚ͘ ΎWϯĂ͘ ĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶ͗dŚĞƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞĂƚϱϭϳϱŝƌƉŽƌƚZŽĂĚĐŽŵƉƌŝƐĞƐĂƐŝŶŐůĞͲƐƚŽƌLJ^ƉĂŶŝƐŚ ĐůĞĐƚŝĐͲƐƚLJůĞƌĞƐŝĚĞŶĐĞĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĞĚŝŶϭϵϮϴ
;ƵŝůĚŝŶŐϭͿƐŝƚƵĂƚĞĚŽŶϭϴ͘ϲϯĂĐƌĞƐŽĨĂŐƌŝĐƵůƚƵƌĂůůĂŶĚŝŶWĂƐŽZŽďůĞƐ͕^ĂŶ>ƵŝƐKďŝƐƉŽŽƵŶƚLJ͕ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ͘dŚĞƌĞƐŝĚĞŶĐĞŝƐƉĂƌƚ ŽĨĂƐŵĂůůĨĂƌŵĐŽŵƉůĞdžĐŽŶƐŝƐƚŝŶŐŽĨĂĚĞƚĂĐŚĞĚŐĂƌĂŐĞŽĨƚŚĞƐĂŵĞƐƚLJůĞ;ϮͿ͕ĂŶĚĂďĂƌŶ;ϯͿĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĞĚĐŝƌĐĂϭϵϳϱ;ĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĞĚ ŽŶƉĂŐĞϰͿ͘
ΎWϯď͘ ZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƚƚƌŝďƵƚĞƐ͗,WϮ͘^ŝŶŐůĞͲĨĂŵŝůLJƌĞƐŝĚĞŶĐĞ͖,Wϯϯ͘&ĂƌŵͬZĂŶĐŚ ΎWϰ͘ZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐWƌĞƐĞŶƚ͗yƵŝůĚŝŶŐy^ƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ
Wϱď͘ WŚŽƚŽ EŽ͘ ϭ͗ ZĞƐŝĚĞŶĐĞ;ϭͿ͕ ĞĂƐƚ
ĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶ͘ sŝĞǁ ƚŽ ƚŚĞ ǁĞƐƚ͘ WŚŽƚŽ ƚĂŬĞŶ
ϳͬϮϮͬϭϵ ;ƐĞĞ ĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĂƚŝŽŶ͕ ƉĂŐĞƐ ϴͲϭϰ͕ ĨŽƌ
ĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůƉŚŽƚŽƐͿ͘
ΎWϲ͘ĂƚĞŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĞĚͬŐĞĂŶĚ^ŽƵƌĐĞ͗
_ ,ŝƐƚŽƌŝĐ͕ ϭϵϮϴ ;^ĂŶ >ƵŝƐ KďŝƐƉŽ ŽƵŶƚLJ
ƐƐĞƐƐŽƌZĞĐŽƌĚƐͿ
ΎWϳ͘KǁŶĞƌĂŶĚĚĚƌĞƐƐ͗
ZĂLJŵŽŶĚ
͘ŽĚĚ͕:ƌ͘ĂŶĚEĂŶĐLJŽĚĚ
WKŽdžϭϳϱϭ͕WĂƐŽZŽďůĞƐ͕ϵϯϰϰϳ
ΎWϴ͘ZĞĐŽƌĚĞĚďLJ͗<ĂƚŝĞsĂůůĂŝƌĞ
>^͕ϮϬϭƌĞĞŬƐŝĚĞZŝĚŐĞƚ͘ηϮϱϬ
ZŽƐĞǀŝůůĞ͕ϵϱϲϳϴ
ΎWϵ͘ĂƚĞZĞĐŽƌĚĞĚ͗ ϳͬϯϬͬϭϵ
ΎWϭϬ͘^ƵƌǀĞLJdLJƉĞ͗ /ŶƚĞŶƐŝǀĞ
ΎWϭϭ͘ ZĞƉŽƌƚŝƚĂƚŝŽŶ͗Eͬ
ΎƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚƐ͗ _>ŽĐĂƚŝŽŶDĂƉ _ŽŶƚŝŶƵĂƚŝŽŶ^ŚĞĞƚ _ƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͕^ƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͕ĂŶĚKďũĞĐƚZĞĐŽƌĚ Attachment 9
Attachment 6
5HVRXUFH1DPHRU ϱϭϳϱŝƌƉŽƌƚZŽĂĚ 15+36WDWXV&RGH
3DJH Ϯ RI ϭϰ
'35%
5HTXLUHGLQIRUPDWLRQ
6WDWHRI&DOLIRUQLD 7KH5HVRXUFHV$JHQF\ 3ULPDU\ '(3$570(172)3$5.6$1'5(&5($7,21 +5,
%8,/',1*6758&785($1'2%-(&75(&25'
7KLVVSDFHUHVHUYHGIRURIILFLDOFRPPHQWV
ϭ͘ ,ŝƐƚŽƌŝĐEĂŵĞ͗ E Ϯ͘ ŽŵŵŽŶEĂŵĞ͗ ͺͺͺE ϯ͘ KƌŝŐŝŶĂůhƐĞ͗ ^ŝŶŐůĞͲ&ĂŵŝůLJZĞƐŝĚĞŶĐĞ ϰ͘ WƌĞƐĞŶƚhƐĞ͗ ^ŝŶŐůĞͲ&ĂŵŝůLJZĞƐŝĚĞŶĐĞ Ύϱ͘ ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů^ƚLJůĞ͗ ^ƉĂŶŝƐŚ
ĐůĞĐƚŝĐ Ύϲ͘ ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ,ŝƐƚŽƌLJ͗dŚĞƌĞƐŝĚĞŶĐĞ;ϭͿǁĂƐĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĞĚŝŶϭϵϮϴĂƚŝƚƐƉƌĞƐĞŶƚůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͘dŚĞŐĂƌĂŐĞ;ϮͿǁĂƐůŝŬĞůLJ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĞĚĂƚƚŚĞƐĂŵĞƚŝŵĞ͘dŚĞďĂƌŶ;ϯͿǁĂƐĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĞĚĐŝƌĐĂϭϵϳϱ͘dŚĞƐŚĞĚ;ϰͿĂŶĚƚŚĞŵĞƚĂůƚĂŶŬ;^ϭͿĂƉƉĞĂƌƚŽŚĂǀĞ ďĞĞŶĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞϭϵϰϬƐŽƌϭϵϱϬƐ͘
Ύϳ͘ DŽǀĞĚ͍ _ EŽ KƌŝŐŝŶĂů>ŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͗Eͬ Ύϴ͘ ZĞůĂƚĞĚ&ĞĂƚƵƌĞƐ͗dŚĞƉĂƌĐĞůĐŽŶƚĂŝŶƐĂŐƌŝĐƵůƚƵƌĂůůĂŶĚĂŶĚůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉŝŶŐĐŽŵƉƌŝƐĞĚŽĨŵĂƚƵƌĞƚƌĞĞƐĂŶĚǀĞŐĞƚĂƚŝŽŶ͘dŚĞ ƌĞƐŝĚĞŶĐĞ;ϭͿŝƐĂĐĐĞƐƐĞĚďLJĂůŽŶŐĚƌŝǀĞǁĂLJƚŚĂƚĐŽŶƚĂŝŶƐƚǁŽĞŶƚƌĂŶĐĞƉŝůůĂƌƐĐůĂĚŝŶƐƚƵĐĐŽ͘ ϵĂ͘ ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚ͗ƵŶŬŶŽǁŶ ď͘ƵŝůĚĞƌ͗ƵŶŬŶŽǁŶ ΎϭϬ͘ ^ŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶĐĞ͗ dŚĞŵĞ͗^ĞƚƚůĞŵĞŶƚ ƌĞĂ
ƐƚƌĞůůĂ͕^ĂŶ>ƵŝƐKďŝƐƉŽŽƵŶƚLJ͕ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ
WĞƌŝŽĚŽĨ^ŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶĐĞ͗Eͬ WƌŽƉĞƌƚLJdLJƉĞ^ŝŶŐůĞͲĨĂŵŝůLJZĞƐŝĚĞŶĐĞĂŶĚ&Ăƌŵ ƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞƌŝƚĞƌŝĂEͬ ZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞƐƚŚĂƚϱϭϳϱŝƌƉŽƌƚZŽĂĚŝƐŶŽƚŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐĂůůLJƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚƵŶĚĞƌĂŶLJŽĨƚŚĞĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌŽĨ,ŝƐƚŽƌŝĐĂů ZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐĞůŝŐŝďŝůŝƚLJĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ͘ůƚŚŽƵŐŚϱϭϳϱŝƌƉŽƌƚZŽĂĚŝƐĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞZƵĚĞĂŶĚŽĚĚĨĂŵŝůŝĞƐ͕ŶŽĞǀŝĚĞŶĐĞǁĂƐĨŽƵŶĚ ƚŽŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞĂƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐ͕ƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚĐŽŶƚƌŝďƵƚŝŽŶƚŽ^ĂŶ>ƵŝƐKďŝƐƉŽŽƵŶƚLJ͛ƐŚŝƐƚŽƌLJƚŚĂƚǁŽƵůĚĞůĞǀĂƚĞƚŚĞŝƌƐƚĂƚƵƐĞƐĂƐŝŵƉŽƌƚĂŶƚ ŝŶůŽĐĂů͕ƐƚĂƚĞ͕ŽƌŶĂƚŝŽŶĂůŚŝƐƚŽƌLJ͘&ƵƌƚŚĞƌŵŽƌĞ͕ƚŚĞĨĂƌŵĐŽŵƉůĞdžĂŶĚƌĞƐŝĚĞŶĐĞĂƌĞŶŽƚŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐĂůůLJĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚĂŶ ŝŵƉŽƌƚĂŶƚĞǀĞŶƚŝŶWĂƐŽZŽďůĞƐ͛ŚŝƐƚŽƌLJ͖ƚŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐĂŶĚƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐĂƌĞŶŽƚŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐĂůůLJƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůůLJ͖ĂŶĚƚŚĞƌĞŝƐ ŶŽƐƵďƐƚĂŶƚŝĂůĞǀŝĚĞŶĐĞƚŚĂƚĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚŽĨƚŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐŽƌƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐǁŽƵůĚLJŝĞůĚŝŵƉŽƌƚĂŶƚĚĂƚĂƚŽĨƵƚƵƌĞƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚĞƌƐ ;ƐĞĞĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĂƚŝŽŶ͕ƉĂŐĞϱͿ͘
ϭϭ͘ ĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƚƚƌŝďƵƚĞƐ͗Eͬ ΎϭϮ͘ ZĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞƐ͗^ĞĞĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĂƚŝŽŶ͕ƉĂŐĞϲ͘
ϭϯ͘ ZĞŵĂƌŬƐ͗Eͬ
Ύϭϰ͘
ǀĂůƵĂƚŽƌ͗ <ĂƚŝĞsĂůůĂŝƌĞ
ΎĂƚĞŽĨ
ǀĂůƵĂƚŝŽŶ͗ ϬϳͬϮϲͬϮϬϭϵ
Attachment 9
Attachment 6
3DJHϯRIϭϯ
5HVRXUFH1DPHRUϱϭϳϱŝƌƉŽƌƚZŽĂĚ
0DS1DPH
WĂƐŽZŽďůĞƐ͕ĂůŝĨ͘
6FDOH
ϭ͗ϮϰϬϬϬ *'DWHRIPDS
ϭϵϰϴ;ƌĞǀ͘ϭϵϴϰͿ
'35-
5HY
:RUG
5HTXLUHGLQIRUPDWLRQ
6WDWHRI&DOLIRUQLD 1DWXUDO5HVRXUFHV$JHQF\ 3ULPDU\ '(3$570(172)3$5.6$1'5(&5($7,21 +5,
/2&$7,210$3 7ULQRPLDO
Attachment 9
Attachment 6
WZϱϮϯ>;ZĞǀ͘ϭͬϭϵϵϱͿ;tŽƌĚϵͬϮϬϭϯͿ
6WDWHRI&DOLIRUQLD 1DWXUDO5HVRXUFHV$JHQF\ 3ULPDU\ '(3$570(172)3$5.6$1'5(&5($7,21 +5,
7ULQRPLDO
&217,18$7,216+((7
3URSHUW\1DPH
ϱϭϳϱŝƌƉŽƌƚZŽĂĚ
3DJHϰRIϭϰ
WϯĂ͘ĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶ;ĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĞĚĨƌŽŵƉĂŐĞϭͿ͗
ϭĐŽŶƚĂŝŶƐĂŶŝƌƌĞŐƵůĂƌͲƐŚĂƉĞĚƉůĂŶĂŶĚŵƵůƚŝͲůĞǀĞůƌŽŽĨƐ͘/ƚŝƐĐůĂĚŝŶƚĞdžƚƵƌĞĚƐƚƵĐĐŽ͘dŚĞƉƌŝŵĂƌLJƌŽŽĨ ŝƐĨůĂƚĂŶĚŚĂƐĂƉĂƌĂƉĞƚĂďŽǀĞƚŚĞĨƌŽŶƚĞŶƚƌĂŶĐĞŽŶƚŚĞĞĂƐƚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶ͘dŚĞĞĂƐƚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶĐŽŶƚĂŝŶƐĂ ůĂƌŐĞĨŽĐĂůĂƌĐŚĞĚŐůĂƐƐĚŽŽƌƚŚĂƚŽƉĞŶƐƚŽƚŚĞĨƌŽŶƚƉĂƚŝŽ͘dŚĞĚŽŽƌǁĂLJŝƐĨůĂŶŬĞĚŽŶďŽƚŚƐŝĚĞƐďLJĂŶ ŝƌŽŶƐĐŽŶĐĞ͘^ŚĞĚƌŽŽĨƐĞdžƚĞŶĚĨƌŽŵƚŚĞĞĂƐƚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚĂƌĞĐŽǀĞƌĞĚŝŶ^ƉĂŶŝƐŚƚŝůĞƐ͘ŵŽĚĞƌĂƚĞůLJ ƉŝƚĐŚĞĚŐĂďůĞĚƌŽŽĨĞdžƚĞŶĚƐŽĨĨƚŚĞǁĞƐƚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶƚŽĐŽǀĞƌƚŚĞďĂĐŬƌŽŽŵĞdžƚĞŶƐŝŽŶ͘dŚĞƌĞƐŝĚĞŶĐĞ ĐŽŶƚĂŝŶƐŶƵŵĞƌŽƵƐǁŝŶĚŽǁƐŽŶƚŚĞǁĞƐƚĂŶĚŶŽƌƚŚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶƐ͖ŵĂŶLJĂƌĞǁŽŽĚͲĨƌĂŵĞĚĚŽƵďůĞŚƵŶŐ ǁŝŶĚŽǁƐĐŽŶƚĂŝŶŝŶŐŵƵůƚŝͲƉĂŶĞĚƵƉƉĞƌƐĂƐŚĞƐǁŝƚŚǁŽŽĚŵƵŶƚŝŶƐŽƌůŽŶŐ͕ƚŚŝŶŵƵůƚŝͲƉĂŶĞĚĐĂƐĞŵĞŶƚ ǁŝŶĚŽǁƐǁŝƚŚǁŽŽĚŵƵŶƚŝŶƐ͘dŚĞƌŽŽŵĞdžƚĞŶƐŝŽŶŽŶƚŚĞǁĞƐƚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶĐŽŶƚĂŝŶƐĂůƵŵŝŶƵŵĨƌĂŵĞĚ ƐůŝĚŝŶŐǁŝŶĚŽǁƐĂŶĚĂďĂĐŬĚŽŽƌŽŶƚŚĞƐŽƵƚŚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶĨĂĐŝŶŐƚŚĞŐĂƌĂŐĞ͘ŶĂƌĐĂĚĞĚǁŝŶŐǁĂůůĞdžƚĞŶĚƐ ĨƌŽŵƚŚĞǁĞƐƚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶƚŽƚŚĞƐŽƵƚŚĂŶĚĐŽŶŶĞĐƚƐƚŽƚŚĞŐĂƌĂŐĞ͛ƐŶŽƌƚŚĞĂƐƚĐŽƌŶĞƌ͘dŚĞƐŽƵƚŚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶ ŽĨƚŚĞƌĞƐŝĚĞŶĐĞĐŽŶƚĂŝŶƐĂŶŝŶƐĞƚďĂĐŬƉŽƌĐŚƐŚĂĚĞĚďLJĂƐŚĞĚƌŽŽĨĐŽǀĞƌĞĚŝŶ^ƉĂŶŝƐŚƚŝůĞƐ͕ĂůŽŶŐ͕ ƐŬŝŶŶLJĂƌĐŚĞĚǁŝŶĚŽǁ͕ĂŶĚĂƚĂƉĞƌĞĚĐŚŝŵŶĞLJƚŚĂƚŚĂƐĂŶĂƌĐŚĞĚĐŚŝŵŶĞLJĐƌŽǁŶ;ƐĞĞƉŚŽƚŽŶŽƐ͘ϭͲϲͿ͘ dŚĞŐĂƌĂŐĞ;ϮͿŚĂƐĂŶ>ͲƐŚĂƉĞĚĨŽŽƚƉƌŝŶƚŽŶĂƌĞĐƚĂŶŐƵůĂƌĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞĨŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶ͘/ƚŚĂƐĂĨůĂƚƌŽŽĨǁŝƚŚ ƉĂƌĂƉĞƚƐ͘dŚĞŶŽƌƚŚǁĞƐƚĐŽƌŶĞƌŽĨƚŚĞŐĂƌĂŐĞĐŽŵƉƌŝƐĞƐĂŶŽƉĞŶͲĂŝƌŬĞŶŶĞů͘dŚĞǁĂůůƐŽŶƚŚĞ>ŝŶƐĞƚĂƌĞ ĐůĂĚŝŶǀĞƌƚŝĐĂůĨůƵƐŚďŽĂƌĚƐŝĚŝŶŐ͖ŚŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕ƚŚĞƌĞŵĂŝŶĚĞƌŽĨƚŚĞŐĂƌĂŐĞŝƐĐůĂĚŝŶƚĞdžƚƵƌĞĚƐƚƵĐĐŽ͘/ƚƐ ĞĂƐƚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶĐŽŶƚĂŝŶƐƚŚĞŐĂƌĂŐĞĚŽŽƌ͕ĂŵƵůƚŝͲƉĂŶĞĚĐĂƐĞŵĞŶƚǁŝŶĚŽǁ͕ĂŶĚĂĚĞĐŽƌĂƚŝǀĞŝƌŽŶƐĐŽŶĐĞ͘ ŶĂƌĐĂĚĞĚǁŝŶŐǁĂůůĐŽŶŶĞĐƚƐƚŚĞƐŽƵƚŚǁĞƐƚĐŽƌŶĞƌŽĨƚŚĞƌĞƐŝĚĞŶĐĞ;ϭͿƚŽƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚĞĂƐƚĐŽƌŶĞƌŽĨ ƚŚĞŐĂƌĂŐĞ͘dŚĞŐĂƌĂŐĞ͛ƐŶŽƌƚŚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶĐŽŶƚĂŝŶƐĂĚŽŽƌƚŚĂƚĨĂĐĞƐƚŚĞďĂĐŬĚŽŽƌŽĨƚŚĞƌĞƐŝĚĞŶĐĞ͘dŚĞ ǁĞƐƚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶĐŽŶƚĂŝŶƐĂĚŽŐĚŽŽƌǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞ>ŝŶƐĞƚ͕ŽƉĞŶŝŶŐƚŽƚŚĞŽƉĞŶŬĞŶŶĞůĂƌĞĂ͘dŚĞƌĞĂƌ;ǁĞƐƚ ĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶĂƉƉĞĂƌƐƉĂƚĐŚĞĚǁŝƚŚƐƚƵĐĐŽ͘dŚĞŐĂƌĂŐĞĂŶĚͬŽƌŬĞŶŶĞůĂƌĞĂƉŽƐƐŝďůLJĞdžƚĞŶĚĞĚǁĞƐƚǁĂƌĚĂƚ ŽŶĞƚŝŵĞ͖ĂĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞƐƚĞŵĨŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶĞdžƚĞŶĚƐĨƌŽŵƚŚĞǁĞƐƚĨŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶǁĂůůƐ;ƐĞĞƉŚŽƚŽŶŽƐ͘ϳͲϵͿ͘ ϯŝƐĂŵŽŶŝƚŽƌďĂƌŶǁŝƚŚĂƌĞĐƚĂŶŐƵůĂƌĨŽŽƚƉƌŝŶƚĂŶĚĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞĨŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶ͘/ƚŝƐŽĨǁŽŽĚĨƌĂŵĞ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĂŶĚŝƐĐůĂĚƉƌŝŵĂƌŝůLJŝŶĐŽƌƌƵŐĂƚĞĚŵĞƚĂůƐŚĞĞƚƉĂŶĞůƐ͘/ƚƐƌŽŽĨŝƐĂůƐŽĐŽǀĞƌĞĚŝŶĐŽƌƌƵŐĂƚĞĚ ŵĞƚĂůƐŚĞĞƚƐ͘dŚĞŵĂŝŶďĂƌŶĞŶƚƌLJŝƐůŽĐĂƚĞĚŽŶƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶ͘dŚĞĚŽŽƌƚŽƚŚĞŵĂŝŶĞŶƚƌLJŝƐ ĐŽǀĞƌĞĚŝŶĐŽƌƌƵŐĂƚĞĚŵĞƚĂůƐŚĞĞƚƉĂŶĞůƐ͘dŚĞǁĞƐƚǁŝŶŐ͛ƐŶŽƌƚŚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶĐŽŶƚĂŝŶƐĂƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĚŽŽƌ ĐŽǀĞƌĞĚŝŶĂĐŽƌƌƵŐĂƚĞĚŵĞƚĂůƐŚĞĞƚ͘/ƚƐĞĂƐƚǁŝŶŐĐŽŶƚĂŝŶƐĨůƵƐŚďŽĂƌĚƐŝĚŝŶŐĂŶĚŚĂƐĂŚƵŶŐĚŽŽƌŽŶĂ ƌĂŝůƚƌĂĐŬŽŶŝƚƐŶŽƌƚŚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶ͘dŚĞƐŽƵƚŚĞĂƐƚŚĂůĨŽĨƚŚĞĞĂƐƚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶŝƐŽƉĞŶ͘dŚĞƐŽƵƚŚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶ ĐŽŶƚĂŝŶƐĂƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĚŽŽƌĐŽǀĞƌĞĚŝŶĂĐŽƌƌƵŐĂƚĞĚŵĞƚĂůƐŚĞĞƚ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞǁĞƐƚǁŝŶŐ͛ƐƐŽƵƚŚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶŚĂƐ ĂďĂƌŶĚŽŽƌĐŽǀĞƌĞĚŝŶĐŽƌƌƵŐĂƚĞĚŵĞƚĂůƐŚĞĞƚƉĂŶĞůƐ;ƐĞĞƉŚŽƚŽŶŽƐ͘ϭϬͲϭϭͿ͘ ϰŝƐĂŶĂŐƌŝĐƵůƚƵƌĂůƐŚĞĚǁŝƚŚĂůŽŶŐƌĞĐƚĂŶŐƵůĂƌƉůĂŶ͘/ƚŚĂƐĂƐŚĞĚƌŽŽĨǁŝƚŚŽǀĞƌŚĂŶŐŝŶŐďŽdžĞĚĞĂǀĞƐ ĐŽǀĞƌĞĚŝŶŵĞƚĂůƐŚĞĞƚƉĂŶĞůƐ͘ůůĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶƐĂƌĞĐůĂĚŝŶďŽĂƌĚĂŶĚďĂƚƚĞŶƐŝĚŝŶŐ͘ŐůĂƐƐŐƌĞĞŶŚŽƵƐĞŝƐ ĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚƚŽŝƚƐƐŽƵƚŚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶ͘dŚĞĞĂƐƚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶŚĂƐŶƵŵĞƌŽƵƐĚŽŽƌƐĂŶĚǁŝŶĚŽǁƐĂŶĚĂƐŚĞĚƌŽŽĨ ĞdžƚĞŶƐŝŽŶƚŚĂƚĐŽǀĞƌƐƚŚĞĨƌŽŶƚƉŽƌĐŚ͘dŚĞǁŝŶĚŽǁƐĂƉƉĞĂƌƚŽďĞĂůƵŵŝŶƵŵĨƌĂŵĞĚƐůŝĚŝŶŐǁŝŶĚŽǁƐ͕ Attachment 9
Attachment 6
WZϱϮϯ>;ZĞǀ͘ϭͬϭϵϵϱͿ;tŽƌĚϵͬϮϬϭϯͿ
6WDWHRI&DOLIRUQLD 1DWXUDO5HVRXUFHV$JHQF\ 3ULPDU\ '(3$570(172)3$5.6$1'5(&5($7,21 +5,
7ULQRPLDO
&217,18$7,216+((7
3URSHUW\1DPH
ϱϭϳϱŝƌƉŽƌƚZŽĂĚ
3DJHϱRIϭϰ
ĂŶĚƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚĞƌŶŵŽƐƚĚŽŽƌŝƐŵƵůƚŝͲƉĂŶĞůĞĚŐůĂƐƐ&ƌĞŶĐŚĚŽŽƌƐǁŝƚŚǁŽŽĚŵƵŶƚŝŶƐ͘dŚĞŶŽƌƚŚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶ ĐŽŶƚĂŝŶƐĂĚŽƵďůĞĐĂƐĞŵĞŶƚǁŝŶĚŽǁ͘dŚĞǁĞƐƚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶĐŽŶƚĂŝŶƐĂĐĂƐĞŵĞŶƚǁŝŶĚŽǁĂŶĚǁŚĂƚĂƉƉĞĂƌƐ ƚŽďĞĂďŽĂƌĚĞĚƵƉǁŝŶĚŽǁ͘dŚĞĂŐƌŝĐƵůƚƵƌĂůƐŚĞĚĂƉƉĞĂƌƐƚŽďĞĂĨƌƵŝƚƉƌŽĐĞƐƐŝŶŐ;ƐĞĞƉŚŽƚŽŶŽƐ͘ϭϮͲ ϭϰͿ͘
dŚĞŵĞƚĂůƚĂŶŬ;^ϭͿŚĂƐĂĐŝƌĐƵůĂƌƉůĂŶĂŶĚŝƐƐŝƚƵĂƚĞĚŽŶĂƌĂŝƐĞĚƉŽƵƌĞĚĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞĨŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶ͘/ƚ ĂƉƉĞĂƌƐƚŽďĞĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞůLJϮϬĨĞĞƚƚĂůůĂŶĚĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĞĚŽĨƐƚĞĞůĨƌĂŵŝŶŐ͕ƐƚĞĞůƉĂŶĞůƐ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞŽƉĞŶŝŶŐ ŝƐďŽůƚĞĚƐŚƵƚ͘/ƚƌĞƐĞŵďůĞƐĂŶŽůĚǁŝŶĞƚĂŶŬ;ƐĞĞƉŚŽƚŽŶŽ͘ϭϱͿ͘ ΎϭϬ͘ ^ŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶĐĞ;ĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĞĚĨƌŽŵƉĂŐĞϮͿ͗
,ŝƐƚŽƌŝĐŽŶƚĞdžƚ
^ĞƚƚůĞŵĞŶƚŝƐĂŶŝŵƉŽƌƚĂŶƚƚŚĞŵĞŝŶƚŚĞŐƌŽǁƚŚĂŶĚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĨWĂƐŽZŽďůĞƐ͘dŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐĂŶĚ ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐŽŶƚŚŝƐĨĂƌŵĐŽŵƉůĞdžǁĞƌĞĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĞĚďĞƚǁĞĞŶϭϵϮϴĂŶĚϭϵϳϱŝŶĂƌƵƌĂůĂƌĞĂŽĨWĂƐŽZŽďůĞƐ ŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐĂůůLJŬŶŽǁŶĂƐ͞
ƐƚƌĞůůĂWůĂŝŶƐ͘͟^ĞƚƚůĞŵĞŶƚŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞĚŝŶWĂƐŽZŽďůĞƐĂŶĚƐƵƌƌŽƵŶĚŝŶŐĂƌĞĂƐŽǀĞƌ ƚŝŵĞĂƐŶĞǁŵŽĚĞƐŽĨƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶǁĞƌĞŝŶƚƌŽĚƵĐĞĚƚŽƚŚĞĂƌĞĂ͘^ĞƚƚůĞŵĞŶƚŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞĚĨƵƌƚŚĞƌĂĨƚĞƌ WĂƐŽZŽďůĞƐďĞĐĂŵĞĂƚŽƵƌŝƐƚĚĞƐƚŝŶĂƚŝŽŶĨŽƌŝƚƐŚŽƚƐƉƌŝŶŐƐďĞƚǁĞĞŶϭϴϵϭĂŶĚŝŶƚŽƚŚĞϭϵϯϬƐ͕ĂĨƚĞƌƚŚĞ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŽĨĂŵƉZŽďĞƌƚƐĂŶĚ
ƐƚƌĞůůĂƌŵLJŝƌĨŝĞůĚ;WĂƐŽƌŽďůĞƐDƵŶŝĐŝƉĂůŝƌƉŽƌƚͿŝŶƚŚĞϭϵϰϬƐĂŶĚ ϭϵϱϬƐ͕ĂŶĚĂĨƚĞƌWĂƐŽZŽďůĞƐďĞĐĂŵĞĂƉƌĞŵŝĞƌǁŝŶĞĚĞƐƚŝŶĂƚŝŽŶŝŶƚŚĞϭϵϳϬƐƚŽƉƌĞƐĞŶƚ͘dŚĞƌĞƐŝĚĞŶĐĞ ǁĂƐĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĞĚŝŶϭϵϮϴŽŶůĂŶĚƚŚĂƚŚĂĚďĞĞŶƵƐĞĚĨŽƌĂŐƌŝĐƵůƚƵƌĞƐŝŶĐĞĂƚůĞĂƐƚƚŚĞϭϴϴϬƐ͘ŐƌŝĐƵůƚƵƌĞ ǁĂƐƚŚĞƉƌŝŵĞƌĞĂƐŽŶƉĞŽƉůĞƐĞƚƚůĞĚŝŶƚŚĞƌƵƌĂůŽƵƚƐŬŝƌƚƐŽĨWĂƐŽZŽďůĞƐ͘ƵƌŝŶŐƚŚŝƐƚŝŵĞ͕ƚŚĞĨĂƌŵƐ ĂŶĚƌĂŶĐŚĞƐŽŶƚŚĞŽƵƚƐŬŝƌƚƐŽĨWĂƐŽZŽďůĞƐŐƌĞǁŐƌĂŝŶƐĂŶĚǁŚĞĂƚŽƌǁĂƐƵƐĞĚĨŽƌůŝǀĞƐƚŽĐŬ͘tŝŶĞ ŐƌĂƉĞƉƌŽĚƵĐƚŝŽŶŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞĚĚƌĂŵĂƚŝĐĂůůLJŝŶƚŚĞĞĂƌůLJϭϵϳϬƐĂŶĚĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJƌĞŵĂŝŶƐŽŶĞŽĨWĂƐŽZŽďůĞƐ ůĂƌŐĞƐƚƚŽƵƌŝƐƚĂƚƚƌĂĐƚŝŽŶƐ͘
WƌŽƉĞƌƚLJ,ŝƐƚŽƌLJ
dŚĞϭϴϲϵ'ĞŶĞƌĂů>ĂŶĚKĨĨŝĐĞWůĂƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϭϭŽĨdŽǁŶƐŚŝƉϮϲƐŽƵƚŚ͕ZĂŶŐĞϭϮĞĂƐƚ͕ŽĨƚŚĞ DŽƵŶƚŝĂďůŽĂƐĞĂŶĚDĞƌŝĚŝĂŶĂƐĐŽŶƚĂŝŶŝŶŐ͞ůĞǀĞůůĂŶĚƐŽŝůϭƐƚΘϮŶĚƌĂƚĞ͟ďƵƚĚŽĞƐŶŽƚĚĞƉŝĐƚĂŶLJ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐŽƌƌŽĂĚƐŶĞĂƌďLJ͘dŚĞϭϴϳϰKĨĨŝĐŝĂůDĂƉŽĨƚŚĞŽƵŶƚLJŽĨ^ĂŶ>ƵŝƐKďŝƐƉŽĚĞƉŝĐƚƐŶŽůĂƌŐĞ ƌĂŶĐŚĞƐŽƌĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͖ŚŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕ƚŚĞůĂŶĚŝƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞ ƐƚƌĞůůĂ^ĐŚŽŽůŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ͘/Ŷϭϴϳϵ͕ŵĂĚŽƌZƵĚĞ
ƉƵƌĐŚĂƐĞĚĂƐĞĐƚŝŽŶŽĨůĂŶĚŝŶƚŚĞ͞
ƐƚƌĞůůĂWůĂŝŶƐ͟ŽŶǁŚŝĐŚŚĞĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĞĚĂŚŽŵĞƐƚĞĂĚĂŶĚďĞŐĂŶ ƉůĂŶƚŝŶŐŐƌĂŝŶ͘ZƵĚĞ͛ƐƉĂƌĞŶƚƐŚĂĚƚƌĂǀĞůůĞĚĂĐƌŽƐƐƚŚĞhŶŝƚĞĚ^ƚĂƚĞƐŝŶϭϴϱϮ͕ƐĞƚƚůŝŶŐŝŶWůĂĐĞƌǀŝůůĞƐŽ dŚŽŵĂƐ͕ZƵĚĞ͛ƐĨĂƚŚĞƌ͕ĐŽƵůĚƚĂŬĞƵƉŵŝŶŝŶŐ͘
ǀĞŶƚƵĂůůLJ͕ƚŚĞĨĂŵŝůLJŵŽǀĞĚƚŽ^ĂŶ&ƌĂŶĐŝƐĐŽǁŚĞƌĞ
dŚŽŵĂƐǁŽƌŬĞĚĂƐĂďƌŝĐŬůĂLJĞƌ͕ƚŽ^ŽŶŽŵĂŽƵŶƚLJ͕ǁŚĞƌĞŚĞƚŽŽŬƵƉƉŽůŝƚŝĐƐĂŶĚǁŽƌŬĞĚŝŶƐƚŽĐŬ ƌĂŝƐŝŶŐĂŶĚĨĂƌŵŝŶŐ͕ĂŶĚĨŝŶĂůůLJƚŽ^ĂŶ>ƵŝƐKďŝƐƉŽŽƵŶƚLJǁŚĞƌĞŚĞďŽƵŐŚƚĂƌĂŶĐŚŝŶϭϴϳϴ͘/Ŷϭϴϴϭ͕ ZƵĚĞƉƵƌĐŚĂƐĞĚĂŶĚŵŽǀĞĚƚŽ:ŽƐĞƉŚDŽŽĚLJ͛ƐĨĂƌŵ;ĂƐĚĞƉŝĐƚĞĚŽŶƚŚĞϭϴϳϰKĨĨŝĐŝĂůDĂƉŽĨƚŚĞŽƵŶƚLJ ŽĨ^ĂŶ>ƵŝƐKďŝƐƉŽͿĂŶĚĚĞĞĚĞĚƚŚĞŽůĚŚŽŵĞƐƚĞĂĚƚŽŚŝƐŵŽƚŚĞƌ͕DĂƌLJ͘/ŶϭϴϵϮ͕ĂƚϲϭLJĞĂƌƐŽĨĂŐĞ͕ DĂƌLJ>ŽƵŝƐĂZƵĚĞŵĂĚĞĂĐĂƐŚƉƵƌĐŚĂƐĞŝŶ^ĂŶ&ƌĂŶĐŝƐĐŽĨŽƌƚŚĞƐŽƵƚŚĞĂƐƚƋƵĂƌƚĞƌŽĨ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϭϭ͘ Attachment 9
Attachment 6
WZϱϮϯ>;ZĞǀ͘ϭͬϭϵϵϱͿ;tŽƌĚϵͬϮϬϭϯͿ
6WDWHRI&DOLIRUQLD 1DWXUDO5HVRXUFHV$JHQF\ 3ULPDU\ '(3$570(172)3$5.6$1'5(&5($7,21 +5,
7ULQRPLDO
&217,18$7,216+((7
3URSHUW\1DPH
ϱϭϳϱŝƌƉŽƌƚZŽĂĚ
3DJHϲRIϭϰ
dŚŽŵĂƐŚĂĚĚŝĞĚƚŚĂƚƐĂŵĞLJĞĂƌďLJĨĂůůŝŶŐŽĨĨĂŚŽƌƐĞ͘DĂƌLJĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĞĚƚŽůŝǀĞǁŝƚŚŚĞƌƐŽŶ͕ŵĂĚŽƌ͕ŽŶ ŚŝƐĨĂƌŵǁŝƚŚŶƵŵĞƌŽƵƐŶŝĞĐĞƐĂŶĚŶĞƉŚĞǁƐ͘/Ŷϭϵϭϭ͕DĂƌLJƉĂƐƐĞĚĂǁĂLJ͘ZƵĚĞĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĞĚƚŽĨĂƌŵƵŶƚŝů ĂƚůĞĂƐƚϭϵϮϬ͕ǁŚĞŶ͕ĂƚĂŐĞϲϯ͕ƚŚĞh^ĞŶƐƵƐůŝƐƚƐŚŝŵůŝǀŝŶŐĂůŽŶĞ͘,ĞƌĞŶƚĞĚĂƉŽƌƚŝŽŶŽĨŚŝƐƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJ ƚŽŚŝƐŶĞƉŚĞǁ͘,ĞƉĂƐƐĞĚĂǁĂLJŝŶϭϵϯϱĂŶĚǁĂƐďƵƌŝĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ ƐƚƌĞůůĂĚŽďĞĞŵĞƚĞƌLJ͕ũƵƐƚŶŽƌƚŚŽĨƚŚĞ
^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϭϭƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJ;DŽƌƌŝƐŽŶĂŶĚ,ĂLJĚŽŶϭϵϭϳ͖ƵƌĞĂƵŽĨ>ĂŶĚDĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚϮϬϭϵ͖ŶĐĞƐƚƌLJϮϬϭϵͿ͘ dŚĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJƌĞŵĂŝŶĞĚŝŶƚŚĞZƵĚĞĨĂŵŝůLJůŝŬĞůLJƵŶƚŝůĐŝƌĐĂϭϵϯϬ͘ZƵĚĞƐŽůĚƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJƚŽƚŚĞŽĚĚĨĂŵŝůLJ ŝŶϭϵϯϰ͘dŚĞŽĚĚƐƌĞŶƚĞĚƚŚĞƌĞƐŝĚĞŶĐĞĂƚϱϭϳϱŝƌƉŽƌƚZŽĂĚƚŽŶƵŵĞƌŽƵƐƉĞŽƉůĞƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚƚŚĞ ϭϵϴϬƐĂŶĚϭϵϵϬƐ͖ǁŝƚŚ'ĞůĞŶĞŽĚĚĂŶĚŚĞƌĨƵƚƵƌĞŚƵƐďĂŶĚŚƌŝƐŽĞůŚŽůŝǀŝŶŐŝŶƚŚĞŚŽƵƐĞĨŽƌĂƐŚŽƌƚ ǁŚŝůĞŝŶϭϵϵϲ͘dŚĞŽĚĚĨĂŵŝůLJĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJŽǁŶƐƚŚĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJ͘