CONTRACT NO.: 2026-103
Revised 10-10-2025
Professional Services Agreement between August 3, 2026
City of Rancho Cordova and TDG Engineering, Inc., dba Toole Design Group Page 36 of 37
11.13 IRS Form W-9. Professional shall complete and submit Internal Revenue Service Form W-9 to the City before execution of this Agreement. The City’s Finance Director shall have authority to waive this requirement.
ITEM 9.5.
ATTACHMENT 2
CONTRACT NO.: 2026-103
Revised 10-10-2025
Professional Services Agreement between August 3, 2026
City of Rancho Cordova and TDG Engineering, Inc., dba Toole Design Group Page 37 of 37
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first set forth above, which date shall be considered by the Parties to be the effective date of this Agreement.
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA PROFESSIONAL
______________________________ ______________________________ Micah Runner, City Manager Jessica Fields, Director of Operations
Date: ____________________ D ate: ____________________
Attest:
______________________________
Stacy Leitner, CMC, City Clerk
Date: ____________________
Approved as to Form:
______________________________
Adam U. Lindgren, City Attorney
Date: ____________________
ITEM 9.5.
ATTACHMENT 2
CONTRACT NO.: 2026-103
Professional Services Agreement between August 3, 2026
City of Rancho Cordova and TDG Engineering, Inc., dba Toole Design Group--Exhibit A Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES
.
ITEM 9.5.
ATTACHMENT 2
11 RANCHO CORDOVA ACTIVE MODES WAYFINDING PLAN
Toole Design is pleased to present the following
approach for the Active Modes Wayfinding Plan for
the City of Rancho Cordova. We have included scope
elements that will help the City achieve its goals and
support timely implementation, while remaining flexible and responsive to your needs. Our approach breaks
the project into clear, manageable stages that lead to
a comprehensive branding, signage, and wayfinding
system reflecting local assets and positioning the City for successful implementation. Throughout, we bring
proven experience managing complex, federally funded
projects, including facilitating productive conversations, building consensus among stakeholders, and navigating
technical constraints such as MUTCD, Caltrans, and
accessibility requirements. By pairing strong project
management with clear documentation, defined
decision points, and high-quality, implementation-ready deliverables, we ensure the City is well-positioned to
move efficiently from planning to construction.
TASK 0: PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Toole Design has a reputation for excellent project
management. We understand that the key ingredients
of successful management include excellent
communication and effective management of scope,
schedule, and budget. Our success is grounded in
regular communication with the client to discuss
any issues before those issues turn into problems
that could impact schedule or budget. In addition,
the depth of Toole Design allows additional staff
resources to be allocated if project needs arise.
Toole Design strives to diversify the skills of our
staff members, which increases our team’s overall
flexibility and capacity.
APPROACH
TASK 0 DELIVERABLES :
▪ Kickoff meeting: preparation, facilitation, and
summary notes
▪ Client check-ins (up to 20), agendas, and action items ▪ Project Development Team (PDT) meetings for
Tasks 1 and 2
▪ Invoicing and Progress Reporting
ALIGN AND DEFINE
TASK 1: REVIEW AND BEST
WAYFINDING PRACTICES
A review of the City’s current signage regulations and
existing conditions will set the stage for developing a wayfinding vision and strategy, signage design lexicon, and understanding the city’s fabrication capability and needs. Materials and content created during this step
will be integrated into the System Design.
TASK 1.1: SIGNAGE AND OTHER ANALYSIS
We will examine local streetscape conditions,
destinations, and circulation patterns for people
traveling by foot and bike, existing signs and other
information that may be relevant to sign design
and installation. We will sort the destinations into a
hierarchy that will help planners which are appropriate for which sign types. Toole Design will also consult
with city staff about their fabrication and maintenance capacities and preferences for sign material and
post style for use on signs and will review any local
standards for post and sign fabrication and installation.
In addition, Toole Design will collect and review spatial
NEW SIGN TYPESUPDATED EXISTING SIGN TYPES
Existing and new sign types for the Capital Area Greenway Wayfinding Plan.
ITEM 9.5.
ATTACHMENT 2
12 RANCHO CORDOVA ACTIVE MODES WAYFINDING PLAN
(GIS) data for the current and proposed bikeway and
trail network and existing wayfinding signs, pavement
markings, and interpretive signage and along city’s
streets and trails, and in parks, including the American River Parkway, Mather Heritage Trail, and the Folsom
South Canal, and basins.
Design Kickoff: Project Manager Lauren Pepe and
Graphic Design Lead Nancy Le will visit Rancho
Cordova for a Design Kickoff session, at which we will
become familiar with the routes firsthand, and meet
with City staff. Toole Design will present relevant best practices of trail and bikeway wayfinding based on
our initial observations, as well as relevant national
guidance that should be considered, such as the CA
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD),
and the Public Right-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines
(PROWAG). Staff and the PDT will also participate in
an interactive ‘mental mapping’ activity that helps the project team see the City through their eyes.
Design Brief: The outcome of this meeting will be
a report summarizing the information learned, and
the themes identified learned during this step and a
Design Brief identifying up to 10 recommended sign
types and the key issues which must be solved by the
design solution for it to be successful.
TASK 1 DELIVERABLES:
▪ Existing Conditions Analysis, Design Kickoff
Workshop, Design Brief
Key Decision Point and Approval: The
design team will share the Design Brief
to the City’s Project Manager and the PDT
for review and confirmation. One round of
refinement will be undertaken.
DEVELOP IDENTITY + SYSTEM
TASK 2: DESIGN OF
WAYFINDING SYSTEM
In this task, Toole Design will develop a sign family
to respond to system needs and develop design
concepts for review and refinement.
TASK 2.1: CONCEPT DESIGN OPTIONS
The design team will first develop a recommended
sign family for the City’s wayfinding system, and
explanation of the different sign types recommended
and their essential requirements. This sign family
will include at minimum the following four sign types:
directional, confirmation and turn signs, as well as
ground markings. We will then explore more specific
visual recommendations for the branded sign family.
This step will include a concept presentation of up to
three sign family concepts with each to include:
▪ Visuals showing themes and origins of the concept
based on the City’s existing branding and design
standards as a baseline
▪ Visual exploration of key sign types to illustrate the brand, color, typographic, and material approach of
each concept
Concept options presented for Corridor Metropolitan Planning Organization Wayfinding, including mood boards and a selection of sign types for each concept.
ITEM 9.5.
ATTACHMENT 2
13 RANCHO CORDOVA ACTIVE MODES WAYFINDING PLAN
▪ Options for “Branding hierarchy” (i.e. elements
that highlight local community facilities versus
elements that unify the regional bikeway and trail
brand, e.g., the American River Bike Trail and
Folsom South Canal Trail)
▪ Examples applied to at least four key sign types,
directional, confirmation and turn signs
▪ Potential for decorative sign toppers
▪ Local preferences for materials, fabrication, and
installation methods
▪ One rendering per concept onto photography of
existing route segments
▪ Rough order-of-magnitude (ROM) costs for
fabrication and installation of the concepts
Key Decision Point and Approval: The design
team will present the conceptual options to
the City’s Project Manager and the PDT. One
round of refinement will be undertaken based
on the feedback from this presentation.
TASK 2 DELIVERABLES:
▪ Concept and Final Design Presentations
MAKE IT IMPLEMENTABLE
TASK 3: ROUTES AND DESTINATIONS
For this task, we will start by building on data from the forthcoming Active Transportation Plan (ATP), we will
synthesize existing network data, previous community
engagement, and local knowledge to establish a
hierarchy of destinations that reflects how people
move through Rancho Cordova and best practices for
wayfinding. We will carefully evaluate destinations
based on factors such as trip purpose, connectivity,
visibility, and user needs across different modes.
TASK 3.1: METHODOLOGY
We will work closely with City staff and the Project
Development Team to define a transparent and
replicable prioritization methodology that balances
technical criteria with community priorities. This
will include considering connectivity between
neighborhoods and key destinations, connections
to regional trails, recent and planned infrastructure
investments, and opportunities to expand access for
underserved communities. Where appropriate, we
may supplement prior ATP outreach with targeted
engagement to confirm that the selected routes and
destinations align with how residents and visitors
experience the city today. The destination hierarchy
will be context-dependent; for example, destinations
along a route within a park will be prioritized
differently than destinations along a route through the city.
TASK 3.2: PRIORITIZATION RESULTS
The result of this task will be a clear and defensible
set of prioritized routes and a destination hierarchy
that directly informs the wayfinding system design
and placement. By grounding these decisions in
both data and community input, we will ensure the
final system is legible, meaningful, and scalable—
supporting immediate implementation while providing
a framework the City can use to expand the network
over time.
Key Decision Point and Approval: The client will
share draft routes and hierarchy with PDT for
approval (no formal PDT meeting).
TASK 3 DELIVERABLES:
▪ Prioritization Methodology
▪ List of Prioritized Routes
BUILD THE SYSTEM
TASK 4: WAYFINDING SYSTEM PLAN
DEVELOPMENT
In this task Toole Design will translate the
preferred wayfinding system into a comprehensive,
implementation-ready Wayfinding System Plan that
is both technically rigorous and easy for City staff
to use. Building on the approved design concept
and prioritized routes and destinations, we will
develop a cohesive system that integrates signage,
pavement markings, maps, and other elements into
a clear and legible network. This includes preparing
guidance on determining sign types, messaging
hierarchy, placement, and spacing; developing
detailed wayfinding placement plans for priority
routes with corresponding location maps and sign
types; and producing design intent drawings that
define size, layout, materials, and mounting to
support fabrication and installation. We will also
incorporate graphic standards, typical details,
maintenance and implementation considerations,
and high-level cost estimates into the Plan, ensuring
alignment with City standards and applicable state
and federal requirements. The result will be an
ITEM 9.5.
ATTACHMENT 2
14 RANCHO CORDOVA ACTIVE MODES WAYFINDING PLAN
Administrative Draft and Final Wayfinding Plan along
with supporting GIS, PDF, and template materials,
providing Rancho Cordova with a clear, actionable
roadmap to move from planning to implementation.
TASK 4.1: DESIGN INTENT DRAWINGS
Toole Design will develop official Design Intent
Drawings, illustrating for each individual sign type
how size, color, typography, materials, and mounting,
as well as guidelines for typical placement and
mounting. Please note that structural engineering is
not included; this is typically provided by fabricator at time of construction per industry standards.
TASK 4.1 DELIVERABLES:
▪ Design intent drawings, 11” x 17” PDF (Draft and Final) ▪ Final Layout templates, Adobe Illustrator format
▪ Production-ready map artwork for up to six maps,
oriented heads-up (developed in Task 6)
TASK 4.2: COST ESTIMATES
Using our contacts within the environmental graphic
design industry as well as local sign fabricators,
we will request cost estimates for fabrication and
installation for a sample of each of the unique sign
types, and obtain a minimum of two estimates from
which to develop cost opinions.
TASK 4.2 DELIVERABLES:
▪ Cost estimates table, 8.x5 x 11” PDF and Excel
TASK 4.3: ADMIN DRAFT PLAN
AND FINAL PLAN
Toole Design will prepare a draft Branding and
Wayfinding document for the Rancho Cordova Active
Modes Wayfinding Plan, which would be comprised
of the elements below, some of which will have been
completed in previous tasks:
▪ Executive Summary
▪ Introduction and Design Brief (completed in Task 1)
▪ System Design and Brand Guidelines Sign
Concepts (completed in Task 2)
▪ Implementation Strategies and Project
Prioritization Results (completed in Task 3)
▪ Wayfinding Placement Guidelines
▪ Sign Location Plans (including conceptual Sign
Location Plans for priority routes as the project fee
accommodates)
▪ Cost Estimates
▪ Maintenance Considerations
▪ Design Intent Drawings
This document will be shared with City staff and the PDT for review and input.
Toole Design will then address all comments and
revisions for the final plan and ensure Section 508
compliance for key elements of the plan including
the executive summary and up to 10 additional pages
to share as an abridged public-facing document.
Proposed sign family Toole Design created for Seattle’s trail system.
ITEM 9.5.
ATTACHMENT 2
15 RANCHO CORDOVA ACTIVE MODES WAYFINDING PLAN
TASK 4.3 DELIVERABLES:
▪ Draft Branding and Wayfinding Plan PDF
(first and second drafts)
▪ Final Wayfinding Plan PDF, Section 508 Compliant
Plan sections, and Adobe InDesign document.
TASK 5: ENGAGEMENT
ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY
Toole Design will craft an engagement strategy based
on what we learn at the kickoff meeting and in early
discussions with City staff. We are assuming that the
community has been sufficiently engaged through
the ATP that we can introduce this project through
field testing and will not need any introductory
events. To that end, we have proposed a field-testing
effort, described below. However, we can adapt our
engagement plan and activities if that is not the case.
Engagement Event and Field-Testing of
Revised Concepts: Toole Design will revise the sign
concepts and the team will conduct field-testing of
the revised design concepts. This is a step that we
have found highly useful for several reasons:
▪ It is helpful to “see” the full-scale concepts in the active modes environment to see how they blend in
or contrast with the surrounding context.
▪ It helps stimulate public interest and support for
the wayfinding signs.
Toole Design will print two representative sign types
from each concept at full-scale as well as the full family represented at smaller scale, for placement at three
locations within Rancho Cordova. Toole Design will
design a survey which can be accessed via a QR code on
the printouts for people walking and biking to complete and will present and discuss the concepts with the
public in person, preferably on a high-traffic summer
weekend. We recommend leaving the boards posted
along the paths or bikeways in highly-used locations for two weeks in order to continue collecting feedback.
Toole Design will compile the in-person and survey
feedback and submit a memo to Rancho Cordova
project staff to review before proceeding with the
Final Design Presentation.
TASK 5 DELIVERABLES:
▪ Engagement Strategy
▪ Engagement Events (Field Testing and Survey)
TASK 6: UPDATE THE CITY’S
BIKE MAP
Toole Design will provide sample map styles and
formats for discussion, in order to collaboratively
establish the constraints and goals for map design,
in alignment with the project brand identity. Once an
approach has been agreed upon, Toole Design will
update the City’s bike map using a combination of GIS
and Adobe Illustrator. One round of GIS content will be shared with the client for feedback on information to
be included before proceeding to visual design. Draft
map design will be provided, with up to two rounds of
feedback based on consolidated client comments.
TASK 6 DELIVERABLES:
▪ Map working session, including draft extents and
discussion of goals and constraints
▪ Map drafts (up to two)
▪ Map final digital and print versions
BOYSON RD NEBOYSON RD NE
C A V E N EC A V E N E
74TH ST NE74TH ST NE
42ND ST NE42ND ST NE
N C E N T E R P O I N T R D
B OY S O N R D
N C E N T E R P O I N T R D
CO U N C I L ST
Noelridge
Park
Noelridge
Park
Elmcrest
Country Club
Elmcrest
Country Club
Tucker
Park
Tucker
Park
Nixon
Park
Nixon
Park
Dry Creek
Twin Pines
Golf Course &
Mini Pines
Mini Golf
Twin Pines
Golf Course &
Mini Pines
Mini Golf
CEDAR VALLEY NATURE TRAIL
FUTURE TRAIL
CONNECTION
GRANT WOOD TRAIL
1/2 MILE
1 MILE
YOU ARE HERE
N
Wayfinding maps created for our work in Cedar Rapids, IA.
ITEM 9.5.
ATTACHMENT 2
16 RANCHO CORDOVA ACTIVE MODES WAYFINDING PLAN
Our schedule includes all tasks to support the initial build-out of the City wayfinding system as specified in Task 4.
Prior to 2027, our project team will revisit the schedule and fee to plan for any additional build-out phases.
PROJECT SCHEDULE
TASK AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT 0: PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Kickoff meeting
Monthly Check-in Meetings and Progress Reporting
PDT Meetings
1: REVIEW AND BEST WAYFINDING PRACTICES
Signage and Other Analysis
2: DESIGN OF WAYFINDING
Concept Design Options
3: ROUTES AND DESTINATIONS
Methodology
Prioritization Results
4: WAYFINDING SYSTEM PLAN DEVELOPMENT
Design Intent Drawings, Cost Estimates,
and Admin Draft Plan
Public Draft Plan (if needed)
Final Plan
Section 508 Plan
Final Presentation
5: ENGAGEMENT
Outreach Strategy
Outreach Events
6: UPDATE TO THE CITY BIKE MAP
Draft Map
Final Map
Meeting Draft Deliverable Final Deliverable
ITEM 9.5.
ATTACHMENT 2
CONTRACT NO.: 2026-103
Professional Services Agreement between August 3, 2026
City of Rancho Cordova and TDG Engineering, Inc., dba Toole Design Group--Exhibit B Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT B
COMPENSATION SCHEDULE
ITEM 9.5.
ATTACHMENT 2
Assumptions Direct Costs Erin Williams Lauren Pepe Kristen Lohse Nancy Le Sam Person TBD TBD Hour Total Fee Total Designer II Project
Planner II QA/QC Graphic
Designer
Graphic
Designer Planner II GIS Analyst
233.84$ 205.76 $ 237.11 $ 126.76 $ 128.86 $ 150.00 $ 126.76 $
0. Project Management 8 44 16 2 12 2 84 15,263.56 $
Kickoff meeting 2 8 4 2 2 2 20 3,432.04 $
Check-in Meetings (~20 total) and Progress Reporting 4 28 12 44 8,217.76 $ PDT Meetings (2 total) 2 8 10 20 3,613.76 $
1. Review & Best Wayfinding Practices 1 28 2 44 4 24 0 103 16,162.22 $ Site Visit 16 24 40 6,334.40$
Design Brief 1 12 2 20 4 24 63 9,827.82$
Task 2: Design of Wayfinding 4 20 40 60 16 6 148 21,487.34$ Preferred Concept Package 4 20 2 40 60 16 6 148 21,487.34$ Task 3. Routes & Destinations 2 14 4 0 30 6 58 9,590.14$ Process for Prioritization 1822 16 3 3 2 5,387.94$
List of Route and Destinations 1 6 2 14 3 26 4,202.20$
Task 4. Wayfinding System Plan Development 19 66 11 168 174 144 36 618 90,512.01$ Admin Draft Plan (including Design Intent Drawings) 14 32 8 140 140 120 32 486 69,598.08$ Final Plan (including cost estimates) 3 20 3 20 30 12 4 92 14,236.09$ Section 508 Abridged Plan 2 4 4 12 22 3,234.00$
Final Presentation 2 12 4 18 3,443.84$
Task 5. Community Engagement 1 12 0 14 8 36 0 71 10,908.48$ Outreach Strategy 1 2 4 7 1,245.36$
Outreach Events 10 14 8 32 64 9,663.12$
Task 6. Update to City Bike Map 3 9 0 12 50 0 30 104 14,320.28$ Draft Map 2 6 8 40 20 76 10,405.92$
Final Map 1 3 4 10 10 28 3,914.36$
Font licensing, lunch
and transportation
costs for two staff
during field visit, color
printing 1500 1,500.00$
38 193 13 298 298 262 80 1182 178,244.03 $
8,885.92$ 39,711.68$ 3,082.43$ 37,774.48$ 38,400.28$ 39,300.00$ 10,140.80$ 179,744.03$ ITEM 9.5.
ATTACHMENT 2
MEMORANDUM
City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 2
ITEM 9.6.
DATE: August 3, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM:
Albert Stricker, Public Works Director
Philip Banea, Associate Transportation Planner
Edgar Medina, Assistant Public Works Director
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 2026-36-1 WITH STEER, DAVIES &
GLEAVE, INC. TO INCREASE THE CONTRACT AMOUNT FROM
$99,355.00 TO AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $119,355.00 FOR
CONTINUED SUPPORT OF THE TRIP REDUCTION PROGRAM
EVALUATION
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution.
RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adoption of the Resolution would authorize the City Manager to execute Contract Amendment No. 2026-36-1 for continued support of the Trip Reduction Program Evaluation that promotes and encourages other transportation mode choices as developments are approved in the city.
BACKGROUND
On January 1, 2026, the city entered into Contract No. 2026-36 with Steer, Davies & Gleave, Inc. for support of the Trip Reduction Program Evaluation.
The contract has assisted staff with evaluating the city’s Trip Reduction Program, which includes the CordoVan shuttle routes and incentives provided by the 50 Corridor TMA to walk, bike, and use transit more often. The evaluation is also looking into best practices to encourage other transportation mode choices. The end goal of this evaluation is to provide city staff options and recommendations for an updated program.
Staff recommends a contract amendment with Steer, Davies & Gleave, Inc. to increase the contract amount from $99,355.00 to $119,355.00. The December 31, 2026 term of the contract will remain unchanged. The cost increase is necessary for Steer, Davies & Gleave, Inc. to thoroughly finish the stakeholder interviews and research/analysis needed to make recommendations for future changes to the Trip Reduction Program. Utilizing consultants provides expertise in specialized fields that help establish the best possible programs for the city.
City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 2
FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE
The contract will be funded through the city’s Transit Tax Funds. There is no impact on the general fund.
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Resolution
2. Contract Amendment No. 2026-36-1
ITEM 9.6. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2026 Page 1 of 1
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
RESOLUTION NO. XX-2026
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 2026-36-1 WITH STEER, DAVIES & GLEAVE, INC. TO INCREASE THE CONTRACT AMOUNT FROM $99,355 TO AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $119,355 FOR
CONTINUED SUPPORT OF THE TRIP REDUCTION PROGRAM EVALUATION
WHEREAS, the parties entered into Contract No. 2026-36 on January 1, 2026 in the amount of $99,355 with a term ending December 31, 2026 for support of the Trip Reduction Program Evaluation; and
WHEREAS, this first amendment will increase the contract compensation by $20,000, to an amount not to exceed $119,355 for continued support of the Trip Reduction Program Evaluation; and
WHEREAS, these services will exceed the maximum amount the City Manager is authorized to approve; and
WHEREAS, the Contract Amendment will be funded by the city’s transit tax funds. There is no impact to the general fund.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA does authorize the City Manager to execute Contract Amendment No. 2026-36-1 with Steer, Davies & Gleave, Inc. to increase the contract amount from $99,355 to an amount not to exceed $119,355 for continued support of the Trip Reduction Program Evaluation in a form approved by the City Attorney.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 3rd day of August 2026 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Garrett Gatewood, Mayor
Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk
ITEM 9.6. ATTACHMENT 2
CONTRACT NO. 2026-36-1
First Amendment to Professional Services Agreement between City of Rancho Cordova and Steer, Davies & Gleave, Inc Page 1 of 2 Revised 06/2025
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA AND STEER, DAVIES & GLEAVE, INC
This First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement (“Amendment”) is made by and between the City of Rancho Cordova (“City”) and Steer, Davies & Gleave, Inc (“Professional”) as of July 1, 2026. City and Professional are hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties.”
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Parties entered into a Professional Services Agreement (“Agreement”) dated January 1, 2026; and
WHEREAS, this Amendment will thoroughly finish the stakeholder interviews and research/analysis needed to make recommendations for future changes to the Trip Reduction Program; and
WHEREAS, this Amendment will ensure Professional that the final recommendations align with City priorities and expectations; and
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that changes to the term and services provided for in the PSA are necessary in order for the City to continue receiving services by Professional.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereto agree as follows:
AGREEMENT
1. Section 2 of the Agreement, “Compensation,” provides for the City to pay Professional a sum not to exceed ninety nine thousand three hundred and fifty five dollars: ($99,355). The Parties agree to amend Section 2 of the Agreement in order to increase the compensation amount to pay Professional for additional services. The first sentence of Section 2 of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:
"City hereby agrees to pay Professional a sum not to exceed one hundred and nineteen thousand three hundred and fifty five dollars: ($119,355), notwithstanding any contrary indication that may be contained in Professional’s proposal, for services to be performed and reimbursable costs incurred under this Agreement.”
2. All other terms and conditions in the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect to the extent they are not in conflict with this Amendment.
3. The signatures of the Parties to this Amendment may be executed and acknowledged on separate pages or in counterparts which, when attached to this Amendment, shall constitute one complete Amendment.
ITEM 9.6. ATTACHMENT 2
CONTRACT NO. 2026-36-1
First Amendment to Professional Services Agreement between City of Rancho Cordova and Steer, Davies & Gleave, Inc Page 2 of 2 Revised 06/2025
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above written.
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA PROFESSIONAL
______________________________ ______________________________ Micah Runner, City Manager Herbert Higginbotham, Executive President, North America
Date:__________________ Date:__________________
Attest:
______________________________
Stacy Leitner, CMC, City Clerk
Date:__________________
Approved as to Form:
______________________________
Adam U. Lindgren, City Attorney
Date:_________________
MEMORANDUM
City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 1
ITEM 9.7.
DATE: August 3, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Stacy Leitner, City Clerk
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING A VOTING DELEGATE AND ALTERNATE(S) FOR THE 2026 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES
ANNUAL CONFERENCE HELD SEPTEMBER 23-25, 2026, IN
ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution.
RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adoption of the Resolution would designate Mayor Garrett Gatewood as Voting Delegate and Council Members Siri Pulipati and David Sander as Alternates for the 2026 League of California Cities Annual Conference Business Meeting.
BACKGROUND
The 2026 Annual League of California Cities Conference is scheduled for September 23–25, 2026, in Anaheim, California. An important part of the Annual Conference is the General Assembly. At this meeting, the League membership considers and takes action on Resolutions that establish League policy. In order to vote at this meeting, the City Council must designate a voting delegate and up to two alternates. It is requested the City Council take action to designate a voting delegate and alternates at this time in order to submit that name by the advised deadline of September 1, 2026, in accordance with the memorandum received from the League of California Cities on May 13, 2026 (Attachment 2).
FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE
There is no fiscal impact.
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Resolution
2. May 13, 2026 League of California Cities Memorandum
ITEM 9.7. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2026 Page 1 of 1
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
RESOLUTION NO. XX-2026
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING A VOTING DELEGATE AND ALTERNATE(S) FOR THE 2026 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE AND
GENERAL ASSEMBLY BUSINESS MEETING
WHEREAS, the 2026 Annual League of California Cities Conference will be held September 23-25, 2026, in Anaheim, California; and
WHEREAS, in order to vote at the Annual General Assembly Business Meeting, the City Council must designate its Voting Delegate and Alternates.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA that Mayor Garrett Gatewood is designated as the city’s Voting Delegate and Council Members Siri Pulipati and David Sander as Alternates for the 2026 Annual League of California Cities Conference and General Assembly Business Meeting.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk will submit a certified copy of this resolution to the League of California Cities office by September 1, 2026.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 3rd day of August 2026 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Garrett Gatewood, Mayor
Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk
1400 K Street, Suite 400, Sacramento, CA 95814 • 916.658.8200 • calcities.org DATE: Wednesday, May 13, 2026
TO: M
ayors, Council Members, City Clerks, and City Managers
RE: D
ESIGNATION OF VOTING DELEGATES AND ALTERNATES
League of California Cities Annual Conference and Expo, Sept. 23-25, 2026 Anaheim Convention Center
Ev
ery year, the League of California Cities convenes a member-driven General Assembly at the Cal Cities Annual Conference and Expo. The General Assembly is an important opportunity where city officials can directly participate in the development of Cal Cities policy.
Tak
ing place on Friday, Sept. 25, 2026 the General Assembly is comprised of voting delegates appointed by each member city; every city has one voting delegate. Your appointed voting delegate plays an important role during the General Assembly by representing your city and voting on resolutions.
To ca
st a vote during the General Assembly, your city must designate a voting delegate and up to two alternate voting delegates, one of whom may vote if the designated voting delegate is unable to serve in that capacity. Voting delegates may either be an elected or appointed official.
Act
ion by Council Required. Consistent with Cal Cities bylaws, a city’s voting delegate and up to two alternates must be designated by the city council. Please note that designating the voting delegate and alternates must be done by city council action and cannot be accomplished by individual action of the mayor or city manager alone.
Fol
lowing council action, please submit your city’s delegates through the online submission portal by Tuesday, Sept. 1, 2026. When completing the Voting Delegate submission form, you will be asked to attest that council action was taken. You will need to be signed in to your My Cal Cities account when submitting the form.
Su
bmitting your voting delegate form by the deadline will allow us time to establish voting delegate/alternate records prior to the conference and provide pre-conference communications with voting delegates.
Con
ference Registration Required. The voting delegate and alternates must be registered to attend the conference. They need not register for the entire conference; they may register for Friday only. Conference registration opens June 2.
For
a city to cast a vote, one voter must be present at the General Assembly and in possession of the voting delegate card and voting tool. Voting delegates and Council Action Advised by September 1, 2026
ITEM 9.7.
ATTACHMENT 2
alternates need to pick up their conference badges before signing in and picking up the voting delegate card at the voting delegate desk. This will enable them to receive the special sticker on their name badges that will admit the voting delegate into the voting area during the General Assembly.
Please view Cal Cities’ event and meeting policy in advance of the conference.
Transferring Voting Card to Non-Designated Individuals Not Allowed. The voting delegate card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates, but only between the voting delegate and alternates. If the voting delegate and alternates find themselves unable to attend the General Assembly, they may not transfer the voting card to another city official.
Seating Protocol during General Assembly. At the General Assembly, individuals with a voting card will sit in a designated area. Admission to the voting area will be limited to the individual in possession of the voting card and with a special sticker on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate.
The voting delegate desk, located in the conference registration area of the Anaheim Convention Center, will be open at the following times: Wednesday, Sept. 23, 8:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m. and Thursday, Sept. 24, 7:30 a.m.-4:00 p.m. On Friday, Sept. 25, the voting delegate desk will be open at the General Assembly, starting at 7:30 a.m., but will be c
losed during roll calls and voting.
T
he voting procedures that will be used at the conference are attached to this memo.
Please share these procedures and this memo with your council and especially with the individuals that your council designates as your city’s voting delegate and alternates.
Once again, thank you for submitting your voting delegate and alternates by Tuesday, Sept. 1. If you have questions, please contact Zach Seals at [email protected].
Attachments:
• Gener
al Assembly Voting Guidelines
• Information Sheet: Cal Cities Resolutions and the General Assembly ITEM 9.7.
ATTACHMENT 2
1400 K Street, Suite 400, Sacramento, CA 95814 • 916.658.8200 • calcities.org General Assembly Voting Guidelines
1. One City One Vote. Each member city has a right to cast one vote on matters pertaining to Cal Cities policy.
2. Design
ating a City Voting Representative. Prior to the Cal Cities Annual Conference and Expo, each city council may designate a voting delegate and up to two alternates; these individuals are identified on the voting delegate form provided to the Cal Cities Credentials Committee.
3. Regist
ering with the Credentials Committee. The voting delegate, or alternates, may pick up the city's voting card at the voting delegate desk in the conference registration area. Voting delegates and alternates must sign in at the voting delegate desk. Here they will receive a special sticker on their name badge and thus be admitted to the voting area at the General Assembly.
4. Signin
g Initiated Resolution Petitions. Only those individuals who are voting delegates (or alternates), and who have picked up their city’s voting card by providing a signature to the credentials committee at the voting delegate desk, may sign petitions to initiate a resolution.
5. Voting
. To cast the city's vote, a city official must have in their possession the city's voting card and voting tool; and be registered with the credentials committee. The voting card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates but may not be transferred to another city official who is neither a voting delegate nor alternate.
6. Voting
Area at General Assembly. At the General Assembly, individuals with a voting card will sit in a designated area. Admission to the voting area will be limited to the individual in possession of the voting card and with a special sticker on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate.
7. Resolv
ing Disputes. In case of dispute, the credentials committee will determine the validity of signatures on petitioned resolutions and the right of a city official to vote at the General Assembly.
ITEM 9.7.
ATTACHMENT 2
Sixty days before the
Annual Conference
and Expo, Cal Cities
members may submit
policy proposals on
issues of importance
to cities. The resolution must
have the concurrence of at least
five additional member cities or
individual members.
How it works: Cal Cities
Resolutions and the General Assembly
General Assembly
General Resolutions Policy Committees
Developing League of California Cities policy is a dynamic process that engages a wide range of members to ensure Cal Cities represents cities with one voice. These policies directly guide Cal Cities’ advocacy to promote local decision-making, and lobby against statewide policies that erode local control.
The resolutions process and General Assembly is one way that city officials can directly participate in the development of Cal Cities policy. If a resolution is approved at the General Assembly, it becomes official Cal Cities policy. Here’s how resolutions and the General Assembly work.
The petitioned
resolution is an
alternate method
to introduce policy
proposals during
the annual conference. The
petition must be signed by
voting delegates from 10% of
member cities, and submitted to
the Cal Cities President at least
24 hours before the beginning
of the General Assembly.
Petitioned Resolutions
The Cal Cities
President assigns
general resolutions
to policy committees
where members
review, debate, and recommend
positions for each policy proposal.
Recommendations are forwarded
to the Resolutions Committee.
Who’s who
The Resolutions Committee
includes representatives
from each Cal Cities
diversity caucus, regional
division, municipal
department, and policy
committee, as well as
individuals appointed by
the Cal Cities president.
Voting delegates
are appointed by each
member city; every city
has one voting delegate.
The General Assembly is a
meeting of the collective
body of all voting
delegates —one from
every member city.
Seven policy committees
meet throughout the year
to review and recommend
positions to take on bills
and regulatory proposals.
Policy committees include
members from each Cal
Cities diversity caucus,
regional division, and
municipal department,
as well as individuals
appointed by the Cal
Cities president.
During the General Assembly, voting delegates
debate and consider general and petitioned
resolutions forwarded by the Resolutions
Committee. Potential Cal Cities bylaws
amendments are also considered at this meeting.
Cal Cities policy
development is a member-
informed process,
grounded in the voices and
experiences of city officials
throughout the state.
For more information visit www.calcities.org/general-assembly Prior to the Annual Conference and Expo
Resolutions Committee
The Resolutions
Committee considers
all resolutions. General
Resolutions approved
1 by
either a policy committee
or the Resolutions Committee are next
considered by the General Assembly.
General resolutions not approved, or
referred for further study by both a
policy committee and the Resolutions
Committee do not go to the General
Assembly. All Petitioned Resolutions
are considered by the General
Assembly, unless disqualified.
2 During the Annual Conference and Expo
1 The Resolution Committee can amend a general resolution prior to sending it to the General Assembly. 2 Petitioned Resolutions may be disqualified by the Resolutions Committee according to Cal Cities Bylaws Article VI. Sec. 5(f).
ITEM 9.7.
ATTACHMENT 2
MEMORANDUM
City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 2
ITEM 9.8.
DATE: August 3, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Matt Thomas, Facilities Services Manager
Laurel Bane, Facilities Management Analyst
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONTRACT NO. 2026-73 IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $648,313 WITH PACIFIC POLYMERS, INC. FOR THE CITY HALL ROOF
REPLACEMENT PROJECT
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution.
RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adoption of the Resolution would authorize the City Manager to execute contract 2026-73 with Pacific Polymers Inc. in an amount not to exceed $648,313 to replace the roof at Rancho Cordova City Hall.
BACKGROUND
To replace the existing worn roof that is no longer under warranty with a new 30-year single-ply PVC Roof assembly at Rancho Cordova City Hall.
The city hired Calpo Hom and Dong Architects to conduct a preliminary roof investigation to assess existing conditions and provide final design and construction documents. A hazardous materials survey was conducted. The scope took into consideration the proper way to remove and lay the new roof materials.
The contract award is based on the lowest qualified bidder. Bids for this project were solicited on the city's website and OpenGov procurement website on June 18, 2026. Bids for this project were publicly opened on July 16, 2026, with a total of ten (10) bids received and opened. The city determined Pacific Polymers Inc.to be the lowest responsive and responsible bidder.
FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE
This project is funded from the facilities Capitol Improvement Fund 7300.
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Resolution
2. Contract No. 2026-73
3. Pacific Polymers Inc. Response
City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 2
4. Bid Summary
ITEM 9.8. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2026 Page 1 of 1
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
RESOLUTION NO. XX-2026
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONTRACT NO. 2026-73 WITH PACIFIC POLYMERS, INC. IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $648,313 FOR
THE CITY HALL ROOF REPLACEMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, the city solicited bids for the City Hall Roof Replacement Project 80139 under the requirements of state and local law and publicly opened bids on July 16, 2026; and
WHEREAS, the lowest responsible and responsible bidder is, Pacific Polymers, Inc.; and
WHEREAS, adoption of this Resolution will award Contract No. 2026-73 to Pacific Polymers, Inc. in an amount not exceed $648,313 for the City Hall Roof Replacement Project; and
WHEREAS, the contract will be paid through Capitol Facilities Fund (CFF) 7300.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA does authorize the City Manager to execute Contract No. 2026-73 with Pacific Polymers, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $648,313 in a form approved by the City Attorney.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 3rd day of August 2026 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Garrett Gatewood, Mayor
Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk
Construction Services Agreement between City of
Rancho Cordova and Pacific Polymers, Inc.
Revised 06/2025
CONTRACT NO. 2026-73
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA AND PACIFIC POLYMERS, INC.
FOR THE CITY HALL ROOF REPLACEMENT PROJECT
T
HIS AGREEMENT (hereinafter referred to as “Agreement”) is made by and between the City of Rancho Cordova, a California municipal corporation, (herein “City”) and Pacific Polymers, Inc. , (herein “Contractor”), as of August 5,2026.
W
HEREAS, the City Council for the City heretofore caused and specifications for The City Hall Roof Replacement Project (“Project”) to be prepared, and therefore did approve and adopt said plans and specifications; and
WHEREAS, the City Council for the City did cause to be published for the time and in the manner required by law, a notice inviting sealed bids for the performance of said work; and WHEREAS, the notice was published on June 18, 2026 in the Open Gov Procurement Portal (“Notice”); and
WHEREAS, the Contractor, in response to such Notice, submitted to the City Council for the City within the time specified in said Notice, and in the manner provided for therein, a sealed bid for the performance of the Project specified in said plans and specifications, which said bid and proposal, and other bids and proposals submitted in response to said Notice, the City Council opened and canvassed in the manner provided by law; and
WHEREAS, the Contractor was the lowest responsible bidder for the performance of said Project, and said City Council for the City as a result of the canvass of said bids, did determine and declare Contractor to be the lowest responsible bidder for said Project and award to a contract therefore.
NOW THEREFORE , in consideration of the promises herein, it is mutually agreed between the parties hereto as follows:
SECTION 1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents are by this reference incorporated in and made a part of this Agreement: The County of Sacramento, Standard Construction Specifications (“Contract Specifications”) dated November 2024; the Special Provisions; the contract drawings, all addenda; the Notice to Contractors; the Proposal; all required bonds; and all supplemental Agreements covering alterations, amendments, or extensions to the contract. The documents which describe the work to be performed are sometimes collectively referred to herein as the Plans and Specifications.
SECTION 2. TERM. The term of this Agreement shall begin on the date first noted above and shall end on December 31, 2026, unless the term of this Agreement is otherwise terminated in accordance with Section 5-22 of the Standard Specifications.
SECTION 3. SCOPE OF WORK. The Contractor will furnish all labor, materials, services, transportation, appliances, and mechanical workmanship required for Contract No. 2026-73, as provided for and set forth in said Plans and Specifications, or in either of them, which said Plans and Specifications are hereby referred and by such reference incorporated herein and made a part of this Agreement. All of the said work done ITEM 9.8.
ATTACHMENT 2
Construction Services Agreement between City of
Rancho Cordova and Pacific Polymers, Inc.
Revised 06/2025
CONTRACT NO. 2026-73
under this Agreement shall be under the supervision of and performed to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director of the City of Rancho Cordova who shall have the right to reject any and all materials and supplies furnished by the Contractor which do not comply with the Plans and Specifications, together with the right to require the Contractor to replace any and all work furnished by the Contractor which shall not either in workmanship or material be in strict accordance with the Plans and Specifications.
SECTION 4. COMPLETION. Said work shall be completed and ready for acceptance.
SECTION 5. PAYMENT. Attached hereto as Exhibit A and by reference made a part hereof, is the bid and proposal of Contractor. Said bid and proposal will contain, as required by the terms of said specifications, the full and complete schedule of the different items with the lump sums or unit prices as so specified. The City agrees in consideration of the work to be performed for the Project herein and subject to the terms and conditions thereof, to pay Contractor all sums of money which may become due to Contractor in accordance with the terms of the aforesaid bid and proposal, and this Agreement, to in the amount not to exceed Six hundred and forty-eight thousand, three hundred and thirteen dollars: ($648,313). Said sum shall be paid in accordance with Section 8 of the Standard Specifications. With respect to that portion of the above sum as is based upon the estimated quantities specified for the general scope of the work to be performed herein, actual payment will be based upon the quantities as measured upon completion. No payment made under this Agreement shall be construed to be an acceptance of defective work or improper materials.
SECTION 6. PREVAILING WAGES. To the extent required by law, Contractor and all of the Contractor’s subcontractors shall comply with California Health and Safety Code Section 33422.1, and shall comply with California Labor Code Section 1770 et seq. and all regulations adopted pursuant thereto (referred to herein as, “Prevailing Wage Laws”), and be responsible for carrying out the requirements of such provisions.
Pursuant to the provisions of Articles 1 and 2 of Chapter 1, Part 7, Division II, of the Labor Code of the State of California, not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holidays and overtime work, for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Project contemplated under this Agreement shall be paid to all workers, laborers and mechanics employed in the execution of said Project by Contractor, or by any subcontractor doing or contracting to do any part of said Project. The appropriate determination of the Director of the California Department of Industrial Relations is filed with, and available for inspection at 2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670, in the City Clerk’s Department. Contractor shall post, at each job site, a copy of such prevailing rate of per diem wages as determined by the Director for the California Department of Industrial Relations. The Contractor shall, and hereby agrees to, unconditionally indemnify, reimburse, defend, protect and hold harmless the City and its elective and appointive boards, commissions, officers, agents, attorneys, consultants and employees, and all of their respective successors and assigns, from and against any and all claims, demands, suits and actions at law or in equity, and losses, liabilities, expenses, penalties, fines, orders, judgments, injunctive or other relief, and costs and damages of every kind, nature and description (including but not limited to attorneys’ fees and court costs; with counsel reasonably acceptable to the City), and administrative, enforcement or judicial proceedings, whether known or unknown, and which directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, are caused by, arise from, or relate to, or are alleged to be caused by, arise from, or relate to, the payment or requirement of payment of prevailing wages or the requirement of competitive bidding in the construction of the Project, the failure to comply with any state or federal labor laws, regulations or standards in connection with this Agreement, including but not limited to California Labor Code Section 1770 et seq. and the Prevailing Wage Laws, or any act or omission of the City or the Contractor related to this Agreement with respect to the payment or requirement of payment of prevailing wages or the requirement of competitive bidding, whether or not any insurance policies shall have ITEM 9.8.
ATTACHMENT 2
Construction Services Agreement between City of
Rancho Cordova and Pacific Polymers, Inc.
Revised 06/2025
CONTRACT NO. 2026-73
been determined to be applicable to any such claims, demands, suits, actions, losses, liabilities, expenses, penalties, fines, orders, judgments, injunctive or other relief, costs, damages, or administrative, enforcement or judicial proceedings. It is further agreed that the City does not, and shall not, waive any rights against the Contractor which they may have by reason of this indemnity and hold harmless agreement because of the acceptance by the City, or the deposit with the City by the Contractor, of any of the insurance policies described in this Agreement.
SECTION 7.
INSURANCE. The Contractor shall carry and maintain for the duration of the term of this Agreement, such public liability, property damage and contractual liability, auto, worker’s compensation and builders’ risk insurance as required by the specifications.
Contractor hereby acknowledges and agrees to the insurance requirements set forth in this ______ section which shall be monitored for compliance by Ebix, RCS, Inc.
Initial
SECTION 8. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CERTIFICATION. By execution of this Agreement, the Contractor certifies as follows:
“I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self -insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract.”
SECTION 9. PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS. The Contractor shall, before beginning said work for the Project, file two (2) bonds with the City, each made payable to the City. These bonds shall be issued by a surety company authorized to do business in the State of California, and shall be maintained during the entire life of the Agreement at the expense of the Contractor. One bond shall be in the amount of one hundred percent (100%) of the Agreement and shall guarantee the faithful performance of the Agreement. The second bond shall be the payment bond required by California Civil Code Section 3247 et seq., and shall be in the amount of one hundred percent (100%) of the Agreement. Any alterations made in the specifications which are a part of this Agreement or in any provision of this Agreement shall not operate to release any surety from liability on any bond required hereunder and the consent to make such alterations is hereby given, and any surety on said bonds hereby waives the provisions of California Civil Code Sections 2819 and 2845.
SECTION 10. INDEMNIFICATION.
10.1 Contractor’s Performance. To the fullest extend permitted by law, Contractor shall indemnify, defend with counsel selected by the City, and hold harmless City, its officers, agents, employees and representatives from and against any and all claims, losses, liabilities or damages, demands and actions, including payment of reasonable attorney’s fees, arising out of or resulting from Services performed pursuant to this Agreement caused in whole or in part by any negligent or willful act or omission of Contractor, its officers, agents, employees, or anyone directly or indirectly acting on behalf of Contractor. The foregoing obligation of Contractor shall not apply when (1) the injury, loss of life, damage to property, or violation of law arises wholly from the negligence or willful misconduct of the City or its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers and (2) the actions of Contractor or its employees, ITEM 9.8.
ATTACHMENT 2
Construction Services Agreement between City of
Rancho Cordova and Pacific Polymers, Inc.
Revised 06/2025
CONTRACT NO. 2026-73
subcontractor, or agents have contributed in no part to the injury, loss of life, damage to property, or violation of law. It is understood that the duty of Contractor to indemnify and hold harmless includes the duty to defend as set forth in Section 2778 of the California Civil Code. Acceptance by City of insurance certificates and endorsements required under this Agreement does not relieve Contractor from liability under this indemnification and hold harmless clause. This indemnification and hold harmless clause shall apply to any damages or claims for damages whether or not such insurance policies shall have been determined to apply. By execution of this Agreement, Contractor acknowledges and agrees to the provisions of this Section and that it is a material element of consideration.
10.2 PERS Indemnification. In the event that Contractor or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Contractor providing Services under this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction of the California Public Employees Retirement System (“PERS”) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of City, Contractor shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any and all employee and/or employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Contractor or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of City, and any attorneys’ fees and costs incurred by the City to enforce this Section.
10.3 No Limitation of Liability for Indemnification. The indemnities set forth in this Section shall not be limited by the insurance requirements set forth in the Contract.
SECTION 11.
NONDISCRIMINATION AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY. Contractor shall not discriminate, on the basis of a person’s race, religion, color, national origin, age, physical or mental handicap or disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, or sexual orientation, against any employee, applicant for employment, subcontractor, bidder for a subcontractor, or participant in, recipient of, or applicant for any services or programs provided by Contractor under this Agreement. Contractor shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, policies, rules, and requirements related to equal opportunity and nondiscrimination in employment, contracting, and the provision of any services that are the subject of this Agreement, including but not limited to the satisfaction of any positive obligation required of Contractor thereby. Contractor shall include the provisions of this section in any subcontract approved by the City.
SECTION 12. TERMINATION OF CONTRACT. The City and/or authorized representative may terminate this Contract in accordance with Section 5-22 of the Standard Specifications.
SECTION 13. AMENDMENTS. No modification or amendment of this Agreement is effective unless made in writing and signed by both the City and Contractor.
SECTION 14. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING. Contractor shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement without the prior written consent of the City.
SECTION 15. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.
15.1 Successors. This Agreement shall bind and inure to the heirs, devisees, assignees, and successors in interest of Contractor and to the successors in interest of Contractor in the same manner as if such parties had been expressly named herein. All times stated herein ITEM 9.8.
ATTACHMENT 2
Construction Services Agreement between City of
Rancho Cordova and Pacific Polymers, Inc.
Revised 06/2025
CONTRACT NO. 2026-73
or in the contract documents are of the essence hereof. As used in this instrument the singular includes the plural, and the masculine includes the feminine and the neuter. This Agreement may create a possessory interest subject to property taxation, and Contractor may be subject to the payment of property taxes levied on such interest.
15.2 Contract Administration. This Agreement shall be administered by Laurel Bane (“Contract Administrator”). All correspondence shall be directed to or through the Contract Administrator or his or her designee.
15.3 Notices.
Any written notice to City shall be sent to:
ATTN: Laurel Bane
City of Rancho Cordova
2729 Prospect Park Drive
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Any written notice to Contractor shall be sent to:
ATTN: Bobby Stepps
165 Enterprise Court
Galt, CA 95632
[email protected]
15.4 IRS Form W-9. Contract shall complete and submit Internal Revenue Service Form W-9 to the City before execution of this Agreement. The City’s Finance Director shall have authority to waive this requirement.
15.5 Governing Law and Venue. The laws of the State of California shall govern this Agreement.
Venue for any action regarding this Agreement shall be in the Superior Court of the County of Sacramento or in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.
15.6 Attorneys’ Fees. If a Party to this Agreement brings any action, including an action for declaratory relief, to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees in addition to any other relief to which that Party may be entitled. The court may set such fees in the same action or in a separate action brought for that purpose.
15.7 Severability. If a court of competent jurisdiction finds or rules that any provision of this Agreement is invalid, void, or unenforceable, the provisions of this Agreement not so adjudged shall remain in full force and effect. The invalidity in whole or in part of any provision of this Agreement shall not void or affect the validity of any other provision of this Agreement.
ITEM 9.8.
ATTACHMENT 2
Construction Services Agreement between City of
Rancho Cordova and Pacific Polymers, Inc.
Revised 06/2025
CONTRACT NO. 2026-73
15.8 No Implied Waiver of Breach. The waiver of any breach of a specific provision of this Agreement does not constitute a waiver of any other breach of that term or any other term of this Agreement.
15.9 Survival. The obligation of this Agreement, which by their nature would continue beyond the term or expiration of this Agreement, including without limitation obligations regarding indemnification shall survive the term or expiration of this Agreement.
15.10 Entire Agreement. This Agreement, including the terms of payment attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A , and the Contract Documents as referenced above in Section 1, of this Agreement, represents the entire and integrated Agreement between City and Contractor and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, and Agreements regarding the subject matter of this Agreement, either written or oral.
ITEM 9.8.
ATTACHMENT 2
Construction Services Agreement between City of
Rancho Cordova and Pacific Polymers, Inc.
Revised 06/2025
CONTRACT NO. 2026-73
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year set forth above, which date shall be considered the effective date of this Agreement.
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA CONTRACTOR
Micah Runner, City Manager Bobby Stepps, President
Date: Date:
Attest:
Stacy Leitner, CMC, City Clerk
Date:
Approved as to Form:
Adam U. Lindgren, City Attorney
Date:
ITEM 9.8.
ATTACHMENT 2
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
ITEM 9.8.
ATTACHMENT 2
City of Rancho Cordova
Facilities
Matt Thomas, Facilities Manager
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
[PACIFIC POLYMERS INC. DBA AMERICAN FOAM EXPERTS] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT IFB No. 80139
City Hall Roof Replacement Project
RESPONSE DEADLINE: July 16, 2026 at 1:00 pm
Report Generated: Friday, July 17, 2026
Pacific Polymers Inc. dba American Foam Experts Response
CONTACT INFORMATION
Company:
Pacific Polymers Inc. dba American Foam Experts
Email:
[email protected]
Contact:
Bobby Stepps
Address:
165 Enterprise Court
Galt, CA 95632
Phone:
(916) 582-1265
Website:
www.americanfoamexperts.com
Submission Date:
Jul 16, 2026 12:54 PM (Pacific Time)
ITEM 9.8.
ATTACHMENT 3
[PACIFIC POLYMERS INC. DBA AMERICAN FOAM EXPERTS] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT IFB No. 80139
City Hall Roof Replacement Project
[PACIFIC POLYMERS INC. DBA AMERICAN FOAM EXPERTS] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Invitation For Bid - City Hall Roof Replacement Project
ADDENDA CONFIRMATION
Addendum #1
Confirmed Jul 14, 2026 11:53 AM by Bobby Stepps
Addendum #2
Confirmed Jul 14, 2026 11:53 AM by Bobby Stepps
Addendum #3
Confirmed Jul 14, 2026 11:53 AM by Bobby Stepps
QUESTIONNAIRE
1. Project Contact*
Please provide the following regarding the point of contact for your submittal:
• Full Name (First and Last)
• Title
• Phone Number
• Email
• Bobby Stepps
• President
• 916-582-1265
• [email protected]
ITEM 9.8.
ATTACHMENT 3
[PACIFIC POLYMERS INC. DBA AMERICAN FOAM EXPERTS] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT IFB No. 80139
City Hall Roof Replacement Project
[PACIFIC POLYMERS INC. DBA AMERICAN FOAM EXPERTS] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Invitation For Bid - City Hall Roof Replacement Project
2. Contractor's License*
Any person or entity submitting a bid on this project to engage in the business or act in the capacity of a contractor shall be licensed as a contractor in accordance with the provisions of Division 3, Chapter 9 of the California Business and Professions Code. A bid submitted to the City by a contractor who is not licensed as set forth above shall be considered non-responsive and shall be rejected by the City.
Before awarding the contract for this project, the City must verify that the contractor was properly licensed when the contractor submitted his/her bid on this project. In order for the City to verify the license status of a contractor, the contractor, at the time he/she submits his/her bid for the project, shall provide the City his/her contractor's license information.
No bid submitted to the City shall be invalidated by the failure of the bidder to be licensed in accordance with the laws of this state. However, at the time the contract is awarded, the contractor shall be properly licensed in accordance with the laws of this state. The first payment for work or material under any contract shall not be made unless and until the Registrar of Contractors verifies to the City that the records of the Contractors' State License Board indicate that the contractor was properly licensed at the time the contract was awarded. Any bidder or contractor not so licensed shall be subject to all legal penalties imposed by law, including, but not limited to, any appropriate disciplinary action by the Contractors' State License Board. Failure of the bidder to obtain proper and adequate licensing for an award of a contract shall constitute a failure to execute the contract and shall result in the forfeiture of the security of the bidder.
Please enter the California Contractor's License Number for your company. 969486
Click to Verify Value will be copied to clipboard
3. DIR Registration*
Enter your California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) Contractor Registration Number.
Please Note:
If the City is unable to confirm that the bidder/contractor’s DIR registration is current, the City must disqualify the bidder, as required by Labor Code section 1725.5.”
ITEM 9.8.
ATTACHMENT 3
[PACIFIC POLYMERS INC. DBA AMERICAN FOAM EXPERTS] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT IFB No. 80139
City Hall Roof Replacement Project
[PACIFIC POLYMERS INC. DBA AMERICAN FOAM EXPERTS] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Invitation For Bid - City Hall Roof Replacement Project
1000026412
Click to Verify Value will be copied to clipboard
4. Equal Employment Opportunity Certification*
This certification is required by the Equal Employment Opportunity Regulations of the Secretary of Labor (41 CFR 60-1.7(b) (1)), and must be submitted by bidders and proposed subcontractors only in connection with contracts and subcontracts which are subject to the equal opportunity clause. Contracts and subcontracts which are exempt from the equal opportunity clause are set forth in 41 CFR 60-1.5. (Generally only contracts or subcontracts of $10,000 or under are exempt.) Currently, Standard Form 100 (EEO-1) is the only report required by the Executive Orders or their implementing regulations.
Proposed prime contractors and subcontractors who have participated in a previous contract or subcontract subject to the Executive Orders and have not filed the required reports should note that 41 CFR 60-1.7(b) (1) prevents the award of contracts and subcontracts unless such contractor submits a report covering the delinquent period or such other period specified by the Federal Highway Administration or by the Director, Office of Federal Contract Compliance, U.S. Department of Labor.
Bidder shall confirm whether or not Bidder, and any proposed subcontractors, have participated in previous contract or subcontract subject to the equal opportunity clauses, as required by Executive Orders 10925, 11114, or 11246, and that, where required, have filed with the Joint Reporting Committee, the Director of the Office of Federal Contract Compliance, a Federal Government contracting or administering agency, or the former President's Committee on Equal Employment Opportunity, all reports due under the applicable filling requirements.
Bidder and/or a Proposed Subcontractors Have Participated
5. Public Contract Code Section 10285.1 Statement*
In conformance with Public Contract Code Section 10285.1 (Chapter 376, Stats. 1985), the bidder shall declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the bidder "HAS" or "HAS NOT" been convicted within the preceding three years of any offenses referred to in that section, including any charge of fraud, bribery, collusion, conspiracy, or any other act in violation of any state or Federal antitrust law in connection with the bidding upon, award of, or performance of, any public works contract, as defined in Public Contract Code Section 1101, with any public entity, as defined in Public Contract Code Section 1100, including the Regents of the University of California or the Trustees of the California State University. The term "bidder" is understood to include ITEM 9.8.
ATTACHMENT 3
[PACIFIC POLYMERS INC. DBA AMERICAN FOAM EXPERTS] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT IFB No. 80139
City Hall Roof Replacement Project
[PACIFIC POLYMERS INC. DBA AMERICAN FOAM EXPERTS] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Invitation For Bid - City Hall Roof Replacement Project
any partner, member, officer, director, responsible managing officer, or responsible managing employee thereof, as referred to in Section 10285.1.
Note: The bidder must select "has" or "has not". The above Statement is part of the Proposal. Submitting this Proposal shall also constitute signature of this Statement. Bidders are cautioned that making a false certification may subject the certifier to criminal prosecution.
HAS NOT
6. Public Contract Code Section 10162*
In conformance with Public Contract Code Section 10162, the Bidder shall complete, under penalty of perjury, the following questionnaire:
Has the bidder, any officer of the bidder, or any employee of the bidder who has a proprietary interest in the bidder, ever been disqualified, removed, or otherwise prevented from bidding on, or completing a federal, state, or local government project because of a violation of law or a safety regulation?
No
7. Public Contract Code 10232 Statement*
In conformance with Public Contract Code Section 10232, the Contractor, hereby states under penalty of perjury, that no more than one final unappealable finding of contempt of court by a federal court has been issued against the Contractor within the immediately preceding two year period because of the Contractor's failure to comply with an order of a federal court which orders the Contractor to comply with an order of the National Labor Relations Board.
Note: The above Statement and Questionnaire are part of the Proposal. Submitting this Proposal thereof shall also constitute signature of this Statement and Questionnaire. Bidders are cautioned that making a false certification may subject the certifier to criminal prosecution.
Confirmed
ITEM 9.8.
ATTACHMENT 3
[PACIFIC POLYMERS INC. DBA AMERICAN FOAM EXPERTS] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT IFB No. 80139
City Hall Roof Replacement Project
[PACIFIC POLYMERS INC. DBA AMERICAN FOAM EXPERTS] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Invitation For Bid - City Hall Roof Replacement Project
8. Subcontractors?*
Will you be using subcontractors for this project?
In compliance with the provisions of Section 4100-4114 of the Public Contracts Code of the State of California, and any amendments thereof, each Bidder shall set forth below the name and location of the place of business of each Subcontractor who will perform work or labor or render service to the Contractor in or about the construction of the work or improvement to be performed under these specifications in excess of one-half of one percent (0.5%) of the prime Contractor’s total bid or ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) whichever is greater. The prime Contractor shall list the portion of the work which will be done by such Subcontractor.
If the Contractor fails to specify a Subcontractor for any portion of the work to be performed under the Contract, the Contractor shall be deemed to have agreed to perform such portion itself, and the Contractor shall not be permitted to subcontract that portion of the work except under the conditions allowed by applicable law.
Yes
SUBCONTRACTORS*
You have indicated that you will be using subcontractors for this project. Please download the attached form, complete it, and upload it back here as part of your submittal.
• Subcontracting_Form.pdf
RC_City_Hall_Sub_List_Submission.pdf
9. Years of Experience Under Current Business Name*
Please state the number of years for which the Bidder has been engaged in the contracting of business under its current name. 16 (Sixteen) Years
10. Years of Similar Experience*
Please state the number of years of experience the Bidder has in work of a nature similar to that noted in this Bid.
ITEM 9.8.
ATTACHMENT 3
[PACIFIC POLYMERS INC. DBA AMERICAN FOAM EXPERTS] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT IFB No. 80139
City Hall Roof Replacement Project
[PACIFIC POLYMERS INC. DBA AMERICAN FOAM EXPERTS] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Invitation For Bid - City Hall Roof Replacement Project
16 (Sixteen) Years
11. Failure to Complete Work Satisfactorily*
Has the Bidder, as a Contractor, ever failed to satisfactorily complete a Contract awarded to it? No
12. Completed Contracts*
Provide information for at least three (3) contracts that have been satisfactorily completed by the Bidder in the last three (3) years.
For each contract, provide the following:
• Year
• Type of Work
• Contract Amount
• Owner/Agency for Whom Work Was Performed
• 2024
• Remove existing roof system and install new single ply roof system. • $742,560.00
• City of Galt
• 2025
• Install new single ply roof system.
• $998,413.00
• Strathmore Elementary School District
ITEM 9.8.
ATTACHMENT 3
[PACIFIC POLYMERS INC. DBA AMERICAN FOAM EXPERTS] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT IFB No. 80139
City Hall Roof Replacement Project
[PACIFIC POLYMERS INC. DBA AMERICAN FOAM EXPERTS] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Invitation For Bid - City Hall Roof Replacement Project
• 2023
• Install new single ply roof system.
• $643,418.00
• Elk Grove Unified School District
13. Equipment List*
Provide a list of plant and equipment owned by the Bidder, which is definitely available for use on the proposed work as required.
For each item, please provide:
• Quantity
• Name, Type and Capacity
• Condition
• Location
• A document with the equipment list can also be attached under the "Additional Information" question towards the end of this submittal. Please add “See Attachment in Additional Information” to the Response below. • 2 (Two)
• Single ply heat welding machine
• Good condition
• 165 Enterprise Court Galt, CA 95632
• 4 (Four)
ITEM 9.8.
ATTACHMENT 3
[PACIFIC POLYMERS INC. DBA AMERICAN FOAM EXPERTS] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT IFB No. 80139
City Hall Roof Replacement Project
[PACIFIC POLYMERS INC. DBA AMERICAN FOAM EXPERTS] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Invitation For Bid - City Hall Roof Replacement Project
• Drill
• Good condition
• 165 Enterprise Court Galt, CA 95632
14. Bid Bond*
Please download the below documents, complete, and upload. • Bid_Bond_Updated.pdf
RC_Bid_Bond_Scanned.pdf
15. Non-Collusion Affidavit*
NON-COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT
(Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and
Public Contract Code Section 7106)
To the CITY of RANCHO CORDOVA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
The bidder confirms that they are the party making the foregoing bid and declares that the bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation. The bid is genuine and not collusive or sham. The bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a false or sham bid. The bidder has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any bidder or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or to refrain from bidding. The bidder has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the bidder or any other bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other bidder. All statements contained in the bid are true. The bidder has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, to any corporation, partnership, company, association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof, to effectuate a collusive or sham bid, and has not paid, and will not pay, any person or entity for such purpose.
ITEM 9.8.
ATTACHMENT 3
[PACIFIC POLYMERS INC. DBA AMERICAN FOAM EXPERTS] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT IFB No. 80139
City Hall Roof Replacement Project
[PACIFIC POLYMERS INC. DBA AMERICAN FOAM EXPERTS] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Invitation For Bid - City Hall Roof Replacement Project
Any person executing this declaration on behalf of a bidder that is a corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited liability company, limited liability partnership, or any other entity, hereby represents that he or she has full power to execute, and does execute, this declaration on behalf of the bidder.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
Confirmed
16. Debarment and Suspension Certification*
The bidder, under penalty of perjury, certifies that, except as noted below, he/she or any other person associated therewith in the capacity of owner, partner, director, officer, manager:
• is not currently under suspension, debarment, voluntary exclusion, or determination of ineligibility by any Federal agency; • has not been suspended, debarred, voluntarily excluded or determined ineligible by any Federal agency within the past 3 years; • does not have a proposed debarment pending; and
• has not been indicted, convicted, or had a civil judgment rendered against it by a court of competent jurisdiction in any matter involving fraud or official misconduct within the past 3 years.
No Exceptions
17. CARB Certificate of Reported Compliance*
Is the Contractor or any sub-contractors proposing to use any vehicle and/or equipment subject to California Air Resources Board (CARB) In-Use Off-Road Diesel-Fueled Fleets Regulations (§ 2449 General Requirements)? No
18. Additional Information
For any additional information requested or required by any of your previously provided answers please upload that additional documentation here.
No response submitted
ITEM 9.8.
ATTACHMENT 3
[PACIFIC POLYMERS INC. DBA AMERICAN FOAM EXPERTS] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT IFB No. 80139
City Hall Roof Replacement Project
[PACIFIC POLYMERS INC. DBA AMERICAN FOAM EXPERTS] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Invitation For Bid - City Hall Roof Replacement Project
19. Submittal Confirmation*
The party submitting on behalf of the Company noted on the submittal is authorized to submit on behalf of said Company and has provided any authorization showing such if required by this Bid.
In accordance with the Business and Professions Code, the party submitting does hereby, under Penalty of Perjury, certify that the following contractor’s license information is true and correct.
Confirmed
PRICE TABLES
BASE BID SCHEDULE
Item Description:
Line Item Description Quantity Unit of
Measure
Unit Cost Total
1 Demo Work and Staging 1 1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00
2 Roofing Materials and Installation 1 1 $580,000.00 $580,000.00 3 Insulation 1 1 $0.00 $0.00
4 Flashing 1 1 $25,313.00 $25,313.00
5 Crane Work 1 1 $0.00 $0.00
6 Permit Fees and Reporting 1 1 $10,500.00 $10,500.00
7 Waste Hauling and Recycling 1 1 $7,500.00 $7,500.00
8 Asbestos Abatement and SMAQMD Regulatory Compliance 1 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 ITEM 9.8.
ATTACHMENT 3
[PACIFIC POLYMERS INC. DBA AMERICAN FOAM EXPERTS] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT IFB No. 80139
City Hall Roof Replacement Project
[PACIFIC POLYMERS INC. DBA AMERICAN FOAM EXPERTS] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Invitation For Bid - City Hall Roof Replacement Project
Line Item Description Quantity Unit of
Measure
Unit Cost Total
TOTAL $648,313.00
ITEM 9.8.
ATTACHMENT 3
ITEM 9.8.
ATTACHMENT 3
ITEM 9.8.
ATTACHMENT 3
ITEM 9.8.
ATTACHMENT 3
ITEM 9.8.
ATTACHMENT 3
City of Rancho Cordova-City Hall Roof Replacement Project 80139 Rancho Cordova City Hall
2729 Prospect Park Drive
July 16, 2026
Contractor Total Bid
Amount Bid Bond Non Collusion
Affidavit
Contractor's
License
Designation
of Subs
Experience
Qualification
Addendum
#1
Addendum
#2
Addendum
#3
1 Barth Roofing $886,476.00 760030
2 Best contracting Services, Inc. $928,200.00 456263
3 Brazos Urethane, Inc. $1,261,900.00 982578
4 Commerical & Industrial Roofing CO, Inc. $1,051,165.00 542724 None Listed 5 Diablo Roofing Inc. $878,450.00 1069338 None Listed
6 Durable Cool Roofs, Inc. $787,295.00 927886 None Listed 7 Madsen Roofing & Waterproofing, Inc. $740,016.00 519488 None Listed 8 Pacific Polymers Inc. DBA: American Foam Experts $648,313.00 969486 9 Stronger Building Services $1,524,000.00 955618
10 Titans Group Corporation $887,923.00 1128406
Attendees:
Laurel Bane, Facilities Management Analyst Date
7/16/26
ITEM 9.8.
ATTACHMENT 4
MEMORANDUM
City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 2
ITEM 9.9.
DATE: August 3, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM:
Albert Stricker, Public Works Director
Drew Hart, Principal Transportation Planner
Edgar Medina, Assistant Public Works Director
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO
EXECUTE AGREEMENTS WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION FOR A FISCAL YEAR 2026-27
SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING GRANT PROGRAM
FOR THE RANCHO CORDOVA COMPLETE STREETS
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE TO IMPROVE MOBILITY AND SAFETY
WITHIN THE CITY
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution.
RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adoption of the Resolution would authorize the Public Works Director to execute agreements with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant Program for the Rancho Cordova Complete Streets Implementation Guide to Improve Mobility and Safety within the City of Rancho Cordova.
BACKGROUND
The City of Rancho Cordova has been awarded $504,135 for a Fiscal Year 2026-27 Caltrans Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant for the Rancho Cordova Complete Streets Implementation Guide. One of the conditions of the grant award is that the governing board adopt a current resolution authorizing a representative to enter into agreements with Caltrans related to the grant.
Resolution No. 14-2007 adopted on February 5, 2007, by the Rancho Cordova City Council, authorizes the Public Works Director to execute various agreements with Caltrans for transportation grants. Therefore, it is recommended that the City Council authorize the Public Works Director to execute all agreements related to the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Caltrans Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant Program for the Rancho Cordova Complete Streets Implementation Guide.
Caltrans estimates that the grant agreements will be executed in the fall of 2026 and the city is required to complete the project by June 2029.
City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 2
FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE
Funding for the Rancho Cordova Complete Streets Implementation Guide consists of $504,135 from the Caltrans Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant Program and $100,000 from Gas Tax funds providing the required local match for the delivery of this project. This project is in the Fiscal Year 26-27 approved budget and has no impact on the general fund.
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Resolution
ITEM 9.9. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2026 Page 1 of 1
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
RESOLUTION NO. XX-2026
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE
AGREEMENTS WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING GRANT
PROGRAM FOR THE RANCHO CORDOVA COMPLETE STREETS IMPLEMENTATION
GUIDE TO IMPROVE MOBILITY AND SAFETY WITHIN THE CITY
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cordova has been awarded $504,135 for a Fiscal Year 2026-27 California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant for the Rancho Cordova Complete Streets Implementation Guide; and
WHEREAS, one of the conditions of the grant award is that the governing board adopt a current resolution authorizing a representative to enter into agreements with Caltrans related to the grant; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 14-2007, adopted on February 5, 2007 by the Rancho Cordova City Council, authorizes the Public Works Director to execute various agreements with Caltrans for transportation grants.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA that the City Council authorizes the Public Works Director to execute all agreements related to Fiscal Year 2026-27 Caltrans Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant Program for the Rancho Cordova Complete Streets Implementation Guide.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 3rd of August 2026 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Garrett Gatewood, Mayor
Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk
MEMORANDUM
City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 2
ITEM 9.10.
DATE: August 3, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Albert Stricker, Public Works Director
Kristine Courdy, Principal Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE APPOINTMENT OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CORDOVA AND GOLDEN STATE WATER
REPRESENTATIVES TO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE
SACRAMENTO CENTRAL GROUNDWATER AUTHORITY
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution.
RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adoption of the Resolution would appoint City of Rancho Cordova and Golden State Water Company representatives to the Sacramento Central Groundwater Authority (SCGA) Board of Directors.
BACKGROUND
On August 7, 2006, the City Council authorized the creation of the Sacramento Central Groundwater Authority (SCGA) through execution of a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) with the Cities of Elk Grove, Folsom, Sacramento, and the County of Sacramento. The purpose of the SCGA is to:
• Maintain the long-term sustainable yield of the Central Groundwater Basin • Manage the use of groundwater in the Central Groundwater Basin • Coordinate efforts among those entities represented on the governing board of the SCGA to devise and implement strategies to safeguard groundwater quality • Work collaboratively with other entities to promote coordination of water policies and activities throughout the region
The JPA was first amended in 2017 to allow the Florin Resources Conservation District/Elk Grove Water Service, the Omochumne-Hartnell Water District, and the Rancho Murieta Community Services District to appoint a designated employee to the SCGA Governing Board.
The JPA was amended for the second time in 2021 to incorporate the adjustment of SCGA's boundaries, change in governing board membership based on the boundary adjustments, modify its governing board membership eligibility criteria, and update technical definitions. As outlined in the JPA, City of Rancho Cordova and Golden State Water representatives are
City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 2
appointed by the Rancho Cordova City Council to the SCGA Board. The next four-year term is August 2026 to August 2030. Staff recommends that Council appoint the following members and alternates to the SCGA Board:
Organization Nominees and Alternates
City of Rancho Cordova Albert Stricker, Public Works Director Kristine Courdy, Principal Civil Engineer (alt)
Margarita Dronov, Senior Civil Engineer (alt)
Golden State Water Company Sean Twilla, General Manager, Northern District Mark Insco, Engineering Planning Manager (alt)
FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE
The appointment of representatives to the Governing Board of the SCGA will have no fiscal impacts to the city's General Fund.
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Resolution
ITEM 9.10. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2026 Page 1 of 2
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
RESOLUTION NO. XX-2026
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPOINTMENTS OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CORDOVA AND GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY REPRESENTATIVES TO THE
GOVERNING BOARD OF THE SACRAMENTO CENTRAL GROUNDWATER AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, on August 7, 2006, City Council authorized the creation of the Sacramento Central Groundwater Authority (SCGA) through execution of a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) with the Cities of Elk Grove, Folsom, Rancho Cordova, Sacramento and the County of Sacramento; and
WHEREAS, the cities and county will make appointments of the Governing Board of the SCGA as set forth in the JPA; and
WHEREAS, the Golden State Water Company representative shall be appointed by the Rancho Cordova City Council as set forth in the JPA; and
WHEREAS, the members of the governing board serve four-year terms and are subject to reappointment; and
WHEREAS, the next four-year term is August 2026 to August 2030.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA does appoint the following individuals to serve on the Sacramento Central Groundwater Authority Governing Board:
Organization Nominees and Alternates
City of Rancho Cordova Albert Stricker, Public Works Director Kristine Courdy, Principal Engineer (alt)
Margarita Dronov, Senior Engineer (alt)
Golden State Water Company Sean Twilla, General Manager, Northern District Mark Insco, Engineering Planning Manager (alt)
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 3rd day of August 2026 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ITEM 9.10. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2026 Page 2 of 2 ATTEST:
Garrett Gatewood, Mayor
Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk
MEMORANDUM
City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 2
ITEM 9.11.
DATE: August 3, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Kristine Courdy, Principal Civil Engineer
Albert Stricker, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONTRACT NO. 2026-179 IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED
$3,062,316 WITH GOODFELLOW BROS. CALIFORNIA, LLC TO
CONSTRUCT THE MILLS CROSSING RIGHT OF WAY
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution.
RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adoption of the Resolution would result in significant steps towards revitalizing the property and maximizing the use of state grant funds before the end of the year.
BACKGROUND
The Mills Crossing Project is a proposed mixed-use development located at 10153-10179 Folsom Boulevard that was entitled in July 2025. The City of Rancho Cordova received the following grants to install infrastructure and site work that expire on December 31, 2026:
• $4.866 million in Green Means Go Grant from Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG)
• $4.0 million in Regional Early Action Planning 2.0 High Impact Transformative projects from the State of California
In September 2025, the City Council approved proceeding with constructing the infrastructure associated with the $8.866 million SACOG grant funding. On January 27, 2026, the City Council provided direction to continue moving forward with the Mills Crossing Affordable Housing project with Related California, which would create up to 60 units of multifamily housing on the eastern portion of the site along El Caprice Drive. This project subsequently submitted an Affordable Housing Sustainable Communities grant application in May 2026 and is expecting a funding decision in December 2026.
In summer of 2026, bids for the project were solicited on the city's website and OpenGov.com.
Bids were publicly opened on July 16, 2026. A total of sixteen bids were received. The lowest bid was $3,062,316 from Goodfellow Bros. California, LLC. The contractor was selected for
City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 2
award based on the lowest, responsive and responsible base bid. There were no bid alternatives. The Bid Summary Checklist is provided as Attachment 3.
This Project is subject to environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Project has an Environmental Impact Report that was completed and certified under State Clearinghouse No. 2023010102 approved by the City Council on July 7, 2025.
One of the unsuccessful bidders was deemed non-responsive as they were not registered with the Department of Industrial Relations at the time of bid opening, and they did not sign their bid bond. This did not affect the contract award, therefore, staff recommends awarding the construction contract to Goodfellow Bros. California, LLC and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement (Attachment 2). The Project is expected to be under construction starting in late summer 2026 and completed by the end of 2026. Constructing the infrastructure will be a foundation for this affordable housing project and future development at the site.
FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE
The Mills Crossing Right of Way Infrastructure Project would be funded by the $8.866 million in grant funding available for the project.
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Resolution
2. Contract No. 2026-179
3. Bid Summary Checklist
4. Project Area Map
ITEM 9.11. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2026 Page 1 of 2
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
RESOLUTION NO. XX-2026
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONTRACT NO. 2026-179 IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $3,062,316 WITH GOODFELLOW BROS.
CONSTRUCTION LLC TO CONSTRUCT THE MILLS CROSSING RIGHT OF WAY
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cordova received $8.866 million in grant funding from the State of California and Sacramento Area Council of Governments to install infrastructure and site work in support of potential Mills Crossing in-fill projects that expire on December 31, 2026; and
WHEREAS, the city solicited bids for the Mills Crossing Right of Way Infrastructure Project, City Project No. 90056, under the requirements of state and local law and publicly opened bids on July 16, 2026; and
WHEREAS, the lowest responsible and responsive bidder was Goodfellow Bros.
Construction, LLC; and
WHEREAS, adoption of this Resolution will award construction Contract No. 2026-179 in an amount to not exceed $3,062,316 with Goodfellow Bros. Construction, LLC; and
WHEREAS, the project will consist of improvements including grading, storm drain, utilities, streetlights, and sidewalks.
WHEREAS, the project is funded by the State Grant Funds; and
WHEREAS, the project was reviewed under the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and a Final Environmental Impact Report was completed and certified for this project under State Clearinghouse No. 2023010102 approved by the City Council on July 7, 2025.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA does authorize the City Manager to execute Contract No. 2026-179 with Goodfellow Bros. Construction, LLC in an amount not to exceed $3,062,316 to construct the Mills Crossing Right of Way Infrastructure Project.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 3rd day of August 2026 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ITEM 9.11. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2026 Page 2 of 2
ATTEST:
Garrett Gatewood, Mayor
Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk
Construction Services Agreement between
City of Rancho Cordova and Goodfellows Bros. California, LLC Revised 06/2025
CONTRACT NO. 2026-179
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN
TH
E CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA AND GOODFELLOWS BROS.
CALIFORNIA, LLC FOR THE MILLS CROSSING RIGHT OF WAY
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT
THIS AGREEMENT (hereinafter referred to as “Agreement”) is made by and between the City of Rancho Cordova, a California municipal corporation, (herein “City”) and Goodfellows Bros. California, LLC, (herein “Contractor”), as of August 03, 2026.
WHEREAS, the City Council for the City heretofore caused and specifications for the Mills Crossing Right of Way Infrastructure Project (“Project”) to be prepared, and therefore did approve and adopt said plans and specifications; and
WHEREAS, the City Council for the City did cause to be published for the time and in the manner required by law, a notice inviting sealed bids for the performance of said work; and WHEREAS, the notice was published on June 16, 2026 in OpenGov (“Notice”); and WHEREAS, the Contractor, in response to such Notice, submitted to the City Council for the City within the time specified in said Notice, and in the manner provided for therein, a sealed bid for the performance of the Project specified in said plans and specifications, which said bid and proposal, and other bids and proposals submitted in response to said Notice, the City Council opened and canvassed in the manner provided by law; and
WHEREAS, the Contractor was the lowest responsible bidder for the performance of said Project, and said City Council for the City as a result of the canvass of said bids, did determine and declare Contractor to be the lowest responsible bidder for said Project and award to a contract therefore.
NOW THEREFORE , in consideration of the promises herein, it is mutually agreed between the parties hereto as follows:
SECTION 1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents are by this reference incorporated in and made a part of this Agreement: The County of Sacramento, Standard Construction Specifications (“Contract Specifications”) dated November 2024; the Special Provisions; the contract drawings, all addenda; the Notice to Contractors; the Proposal; all required bonds; and all supplemental Agreements covering alterations, amendments, or extensions to the contract. The documents which describe the work to be performed are sometimes collectively referred to herein as the Plans and Specifications.
SECTION 2. TERM. The term of this Agreement shall begin on the date first noted above and shall end on December 31, 2026, unless the term of this Agreement is otherwise terminated in accordance with Section 5-22 of the Standard Specifications.
SECTION 3. SCOPE OF WORK. The Contractor will furnish all labor, materials, services, transportation, appliances, and mechanical workmanship required for Contract No. 2026-179, as provided for and set forth in said Plans and Specifications, or in either of them, which said Plans and Specifications are hereby referred and by such reference incorporated herein and made a part of this Agreement. All of the said work done under this Agreement shall be under the supervision of and performed to the satisfaction of the Public Works ITEM 9.11.
ATTACHMENT 2
Construction Services Agreement between
City of Rancho Cordova and Goodfellows Bros. California, LLC Revised 06/2025
CONTRACT NO. 2026-179
Director of the City of Rancho Cordova who shall have the right to reject any and all materials and supplies furnished by the Contractor which do not comply with the Plans and Specifications, together with the right to require the Contractor to replace any and all work furnished by the Contractor which shall not either in workmanship or material be in strict accordance with the Plans and Specifications.
SECTION 4. COMPLETION. Said work shall be completed and ready for acceptance.
SECTION 5. PAYMENT. Attached hereto as Exhibit A and by reference made a part hereof, is the bid and proposal of Contractor. Said bid and proposal will contain, as required by the terms of said specifications, the full and complete schedule of the different items with the lump sums or unit prices as so specified. The City agrees in consideration of the work to be performed for the Project herein and subject to the terms and conditions thereof, to pay Contractor all sums of money which may become due to Contractor in accordance with the terms of the aforesaid bid and proposal, and this Agreement, to in the amount not to exceed Three Million, Sixty-Two Thousand, Three Hundred and Sixteen Dollars and Zero Cents : ($3,062,316.00). Said sum shall be paid in accordance with Section 8 of the Standard Specifications. With respect to that portion of the above sum as is based upon the estimated quantities specified for the general scope of the work to be performed herein, actual payment will be based upon the quantities as measured upon completion. No payment made under this Agreement shall be construed to be an acceptance of defective work or improper materials.
SECTION 6. PREVAILING WAGES. To the extent required by law, Contractor and all of the Contractor’s subcontractors shall comply with California Health and Safety Code Section 33422.1, and shall comply with California Labor Code Section 1770 et seq. and all regulations adopted pursuant thereto (referred to herein as, “Prevailing Wage Laws”), and be responsible for carrying out the requirements of such provisions.
Pursuant to the provisions of Articles 1 and 2 of Chapter 1, Part 7, Division II, of the Labor Code of the State of California, not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holidays and overtime work, for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Project contemplated under this Agreement shall be paid to all workers, laborers and mechanics employed in the execution of said Project by Contractor, or by any subcontractor doing or contracting to do any part of said Project. The appropriate determination of the Director of the California Department of Industrial Relations is filed with, and available for inspection at 2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670, in the City Clerk’s Department. Contractor shall post, at each job site, a copy of such prevailing rate of per diem wages as determined by the Director for the California Department of Industrial Relations. The Contractor shall, and hereby agrees to, unconditionally indemnify, reimburse, defend, protect and hold harmless the City and its elective and appointive boards, commissions, officers, agents, attorneys, consultants and employees, and all of their respective successors and assigns, from and against any and all claims, demands, suits and actions at law or in equity, and losses, liabilities, expenses, penalties, fines, orders, judgments, injunctive or other relief, and costs and damages of every kind, nature and description (including but not limited to attorneys’ fees and court costs; with counsel reasonably acceptable to the City), and administrative, enforcement or judicial proceedings, whether known or unknown, and which directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, are caused by, arise from, or relate to, or are alleged to be caused by, arise from, or relate to, the payment or requirement of payment of prevailing wages or the requirement of competitive bidding in the construction of the Project, the failure to comply with any state or federal labor laws, regulations or standards in connection with this Agreement, including but not limited to California Labor Code Section 1770 et seq. and the Prevailing Wage Laws, or any act or omission of the City or the Contractor related to this Agreement with respect to the payment or requirement of payment of prevailing wages or the requirement of competitive bidding, whether or not any insurance policies shall have ITEM 9.11.
ATTACHMENT 2
Construction Services Agreement between
City of Rancho Cordova and Goodfellows Bros. California, LLC Revised 06/2025
CONTRACT NO. 2026-179
been determined to be applicable to any such claims, demands, suits, actions, losses, liabilities, expenses, penalties, fines, orders, judgments, injunctive or other relief, costs, damages, or administrative, enforcement or judicial proceedings. It is further agreed that the City does not, and shall not, waive any rights against the Contractor which they may have by reason of this indemnity and hold harmless agreement because of the acceptance by the City, or the deposit with the City by the Contractor, of any of the insurance policies described in this Agreement.
SECTION 7. INSURANCE. The Contractor shall carry and maintain for the duration of the term of this Agreement, such public liability, property damage and contractual liability, auto, worker’s compensation and builders’ risk insurance as required by the specifications.
Contractor hereby acknowledges and agrees to the insurance requirements set forth in this ______ section which shall be monitored for compliance by Ebix, RCS, Inc.
Initial
SECTION 8. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CERTIFICATION. By execution of this Agreement, the Contractor certifies as follows:
“I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract.”
SECTION 9. PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS. The Contractor shall, before beginning said work for the Project, file two (2) bonds with the City, each made payable to the City. These bonds shall be issued by a surety company authorized to do business in the State of California, and shall be maintained during the entire life of the Agreement at the expense of the Contractor. One bond shall be in the amount of one hundred percent (100%) of the Agreement and shall guarantee the faithful performance of the Agreement. The second bond shall be the payment bond required by California Civil Code Section 3247 et seq., and shall be in the amount of one hundred percent (100%) of the Agreement. Any alterations made in the specifications which are a part of this Agreement or in any provision of this Agreement shall not operate to release any surety from liability on any bond required hereunder and the consent to make such alterations is hereby given, and any surety on said bonds hereby waives the provisions of California Civil Code Sections 2819 and 2845.
SECTION 10. INDEMNIFICATION.
10.1 Contractor’s Performance. To the fullest extend permitted by law, Contractor shall indemnify, defend with counsel selected by the City, and hold harmless City, its officers, agents, employees and representatives from and against any and all claims, losses, liabilities or damages, demands and actions, including payment of reasonable attorney’s fees, arising out of or resulting from Services performed pursuant to this Agreement caused in whole or in part by any negligent or willful act or omission of Contractor, its officers, agents, employees, or anyone directly or indirectly acting on behalf of Contractor. The foregoing obligation of Contractor shall not apply when (1) the injury, loss of life, damage to property, or violation of law arises wholly from the negligence or willful misconduct of the City or its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers and (2) the actions of Contractor or its employees, ITEM 9.11.
ATTACHMENT 2
Construction Services Agreement between
City of Rancho Cordova and Goodfellows Bros. California, LLC Revised 06/2025
CONTRACT NO. 2026-179
subcontractor, or agents have contributed in no part to the injury, loss of life, damage to property, or violation of law. It is understood that the duty of Contractor to indemnify and hold harmless includes the duty to defend as set forth in Section 2778 of the California Civil Code. Acceptance by City of insurance certificates and endorsements required under this Agreement does not relieve Contractor from liability under this indemnification and hold harmless clause. This indemnification and hold harmless clause shall apply to any damages or claims for damages whether or not such insurance policies shall have been determined to apply. By execution of this Agreement, Contractor acknowledges and agrees to the provisions of this Section and that it is a material element of consideration.
10.2 PERS Indemnification. In the event that Contractor or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Contractor providing Services under this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction of the California Public Employees Retirement System (“PERS”) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of City, Contractor shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any and all employee and/or employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Contractor or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of City, and any attorneys’ fees and costs incurred by the City to enforce this Section.
10.3 No Limitation of Liability for Indemnification. The indemnities set forth in this Section shall not be limited by the insurance requirements set forth in the Contract.
SECTION 11. NONDISCRIMINATION AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY. Contractor shall not discriminate, on the basis of a person’s race, religion, color, national origin, age, physical or mental handicap or disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, or sexual orientation, against any employee, applicant for employment, subcontractor, bidder for a subcontractor, or participant in, recipient of, or applicant for any services or programs provided by Contractor under this Agreement. Contractor shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, policies, rules, and requirements related to equal opportunity and nondiscrimination in employment, contracting, and the provision of any services that are the subject of this Agreement, including but not limited to the satisfaction of any positive obligation required of Contractor thereby. Contractor shall include the provisions of this section in any subcontract approved by the City.
SECTION 12. TERMINATION OF CONTRACT. The City and/or authorized representative may terminate this Contract in accordance with Section 5-22 of the Standard Specifications.
SECTION 13. AMENDMENTS. No modification or amendment of this Agreement is effective unless made in writing and signed by both the City and Contractor.
SECTION 14. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING. Contractor shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement without the prior written consent of the City.
SECTION 15. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.
15.1 Successors. This Agreement shall bind and inure to the heirs, devisees, assignees, and successors in interest of Contractor and to the successors in interest of Contractor in the same manner as if such parties had been expressly named herein. All times stated herein ITEM 9.11.
ATTACHMENT 2
Construction Services Agreement between
City of Rancho Cordova and Goodfellows Bros. California, LLC Revised 06/2025
CONTRACT NO. 2026-179
or in the contract documents are of the essence hereof. As used in this instrument the singular includes the plural, and the masculine includes the feminine and the neuter. This Agreement may create a possessory interest subject to property taxation, and Contractor may be subject to the payment of property taxes levied on such interest.
15.2 Contract Administration. This Agreement shall be administered by Kristine Courdy (“Contract Administrator”). All correspondence shall be directed to or through the Contract Administrator or his or her designee.
15.3 Notices.
Any written notice to City shall be sent to:
ATTN: Kristine Courdy
City of Rancho Cordova
2729 Prospect Park Drive
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
[email protected]
Any written notice to Contractor shall be sent to:
ATTN: John Hovde
2340 E. Bidwell Street
Folsom, CA 95630
Email Address (used for insurance update requests)
[email protected]
15.4 IRS Form W-9. Contract shall complete and submit Internal Revenue Service Form W-9 to the City before execution of this Agreement. The City’s Finance Director shall have authority to waive this requirement.
15.5 Governing Law and Venue. The laws of the State of California shall govern this Agreement.
Venue for any action regarding this Agreement shall be in the Superior Court of the County of Sacramento or in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.
15.6 Attorneys’ Fees. If a Party to this Agreement brings any action, including an action for declaratory relief, to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees in addition to any other relief to which that Party may be entitled. The court may set such fees in the same action or in a separate action brought for that purpose.
15.7 Severability. If a court of competent jurisdiction finds or rules that any provision of this Agreement is invalid, void, or unenforceable, the provisions of this Agreement not so adjudged shall remain in full force and effect. The invalidity in whole or in part of any provision of this Agreement shall not void or affect the validity of any other provision of this Agreement.
ITEM 9.11.
ATTACHMENT 2
Construction Services Agreement between
City of Rancho Cordova and Goodfellows Bros. California, LLC Revised 06/2025
CONTRACT NO. 2026-179
15.8 No Implied Waiver of Breach. The waiver of any breach of a specific provision of this Agreement does not constitute a waiver of any other breach of that term or any other term of this Agreement.
15.9 Survival. The obligation of this Agreement, which by their nature would continue beyond the term or expiration of this Agreement, including without limitation obligations regarding indemnification shall survive the term or expiration of this Agreement.
15.10 Entire Agreement. This Agreement, including the terms of payment attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A, and the Contract Documents as referenced above in Section 1, of this Agreement, represents the entire and integrated Agreement between City and Contractor and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, and Agreements regarding the subject matter of this Agreement, either written or oral.
ITEM 9.11.
ATTACHMENT 2
Construction Services Agreement between
City of Rancho Cordova and Goodfellows Bros. California, LLC Revised 06/2025
CONTRACT NO. 2026-179
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year set forth above, which date shall be considered the effective date of this Agreement.
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA CONTRACTOR
Micah Runner, City Manager John Hovde, Regional Vice President Date: Date:
Attest:
Stacy Leitner, CMC, City Clerk
Date:
Approved as to Form:
Adam U. Lindgren, City Attorney
Date:
ITEM 9.11.
ATTACHMENT 2
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
CONTRACT NO. 2026-179
ITEM 9.11.
ATTACHMENT 2
City of Rancho Cordova
Public Works
Albert Stricker, Director of Public Works
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
[GOODFELLOW BROS. CALIFORNIA, LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT IFB No. 90056
Mills Crossing Right of Way Infrastructure Project
RESPONSE DEADLINE: July 16, 2026 at 10:00 am
Report Generated: Thursday, July 16, 2026
Goodfellow Bros. California, LLC Response
CONTACT INFORMATION
Company:
Goodfellow Bros. California, LLC
Email:
[email protected]
Contact:
John Hovde
Address:
50 Contractors St
Livermore, CA 94551
Phone:
(925) 449-5764
Website:
www.goodfellowbros.com
Submission Date:
Jul 16, 2026 9:45 AM (Pacific Time)
ITEM 9.11.
ATTACHMENT 2
[GOODFELLOW BROS. CALIFORNIA, LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT IFB No. 90056
Mills Crossing Right of Way Infrastructure Project
[GOODFELLOW BROS. CALIFORNIA, LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Invitation For Bid - Mills Crossing Right of Way Infrastructure Project
ADDENDA CONFIRMATION
Addendum #1
Confirmed Jul 7, 2026 1:38 PM by Shawna Garcia
Addendum #2
Confirmed Jul 7, 2026 1:38 PM by Shawna Garcia
Addendum #3
Confirmed Jul 7, 2026 1:38 PM by Shawna Garcia
Addendum #4
Confirmed Jul 14, 2026 8:18 AM by Shawna Garcia
QUESTIONNAIRE
1. Project Contact*
Pass
Please provide the following regarding the point of contact for your submittal:
• Full Name (First and Last)
• Title
• Phone Number
• Email
John Hovde
Regional Vice President
209-244-3515
ITEM 9.11.
ATTACHMENT 2
[GOODFELLOW BROS. CALIFORNIA, LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT IFB No. 90056
Mills Crossing Right of Way Infrastructure Project
[GOODFELLOW BROS. CALIFORNIA, LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Invitation For Bid - Mills Crossing Right of Way Infrastructure Project
2. Contractor's License*
Any person or entity submitting a bid on this project to engage in the business or act in the capacity of a contractor shall be licensed as a contractor in accordance with the provisions of Division 3, Chapter 9 of the California Business and Professions Code. A bid submitted to the City by a contractor who is not licensed as set forth above shall be considered non-responsive and shall be rejected by the City.
Before awarding the contract for this project, the City must verify that the contractor was properly licensed when the contractor submitted his/her bid on this project. In order for the City to verify the license status of a contractor, the contractor, at the time he/she submits his/her bid for the project, shall provide the City his/her contractor's license information.
No bid submitted to the City shall be invalidated by the failure of the bidder to be licensed in accordance with the laws of this state. However, at the time the contract is awarded, the contractor shall be properly licensed in accordance with the laws of this state. The first payment for work or material under any contract shall not be made unless and until the Registrar of Contractors verifies to the City that the records of the Contractors' State License Board indicate that the contractor was properly licensed at the time the contract was awarded. Any bidder or contractor not so licensed shall be subject to all legal penalties imposed by law, including, but not limited to, any appropriate disciplinary action by the Contractors' State License Board. Failure of the bidder to obtain proper and adequate licensing for an award of a contract shall constitute a failure to execute the contract and shall result in the forfeiture of the security of the bidder.
Please enter the California Contractor's License Number for your company. 977506
Click to Verify Value will be copied to clipboard
3. DIR Registration*
Enter your California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) Contractor Registration Number.
Please Note:
If the City is unable to confirm that the bidder/contractor’s DIR registration is current, the City must disqualify the bidder, as required by Labor Code section 1725.5.”
ITEM 9.11.
ATTACHMENT 2
[GOODFELLOW BROS. CALIFORNIA, LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT IFB No. 90056
Mills Crossing Right of Way Infrastructure Project
[GOODFELLOW BROS. CALIFORNIA, LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Invitation For Bid - Mills Crossing Right of Way Infrastructure Project
1000003476
Click to Verify Value will be copied to clipboard
4. Equal Employment Opportunity Certification*
This certification is required by the Equal Employment Opportunity Regulations of the Secretary of Labor (41 CFR 60-1.7(b) (1)), and must be submitted by bidders and proposed subcontractors only in connection with contracts and subcontracts which are subject to the equal opportunity clause. Contracts and subcontracts which are exempt from the equal opportunity clause are set forth in 41 CFR 60-1.5. (Generally only contracts or subcontracts of $10,000 or under are exempt.) Currently, Standard Form 100 (EEO-1) is the only report required by the Executive Orders or their implementing regulations.
Proposed prime contractors and subcontractors who have participated in a previous contract or subcontract subject to the Executive Orders and have not filed the required reports should note that 41 CFR 60-1.7(b) (1) prevents the award of contracts and subcontracts unless such contractor submits a report covering the delinquent period or such other period specified by the Federal Highway Administration or by the Director, Office of Federal Contract Compliance, U.S. Department of Labor.
Bidder shall confirm whether or not Bidder, and any proposed subcontractors, have participated in previous contract or subcontract subject to the equal opportunity clauses, as required by Executive Orders 10925, 11114, or 11246, and that, where required, have filed with the Joint Reporting Committee, the Director of the Office of Federal Contract Compliance, a Federal Government contracting or administering agency, or the former President's Committee on Equal Employment Opportunity, all reports due under the applicable filling requirements.
Bidder and/or a Proposed Subcontractors Have Participated
5. Public Contract Code Section 10285.1 Statement*
In conformance with Public Contract Code Section 10285.1 (Chapter 376, Stats. 1985), the bidder shall declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the bidder "HAS" or "HAS NOT" been convicted within the preceding three years of any offenses referred to in that section, including any charge of fraud, bribery, collusion, conspiracy, or any other act in violation of any state or Federal antitrust law in connection with the bidding upon, award of, or performance of, any public works contract, as defined in Public Contract Code Section 1101, with any public entity, as defined in Public Contract Code Section 1100, including the Regents of the University of California or the Trustees of the California State University. The term "bidder" is understood to include ITEM 9.11.
ATTACHMENT 2
[GOODFELLOW BROS. CALIFORNIA, LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT IFB No. 90056
Mills Crossing Right of Way Infrastructure Project
[GOODFELLOW BROS. CALIFORNIA, LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Invitation For Bid - Mills Crossing Right of Way Infrastructure Project
any partner, member, officer, director, responsible managing officer, or responsible managing employee thereof, as referred to in Section 10285.1.
Note: The bidder must select "has" or "has not". The above Statement is part of the Proposal. Submitting this Proposal shall also constitute signature of this Statement. Bidders are cautioned that making a false certification may subject the certifier to criminal prosecution.
HAS NOT
6. Public Contract Code Section 10162*
In conformance with Public Contract Code Section 10162, the Bidder shall complete, under penalty of perjury, the following questionnaire:
Has the bidder, any officer of the bidder, or any employee of the bidder who has a proprietary interest in the bidder, ever been disqualified, removed, or otherwise prevented from bidding on, or completing a federal, state, or local government project because of a violation of law or a safety regulation?
No
7. Public Contract Code 10232 Statement*
In conformance with Public Contract Code Section 10232, the Contractor, hereby states under penalty of perjury, that no more than one final unappealable finding of contempt of court by a federal court has been issued against the Contractor within the immediately preceding two year period because of the Contractor's failure to comply with an order of a federal court which orders the Contractor to comply with an order of the National Labor Relations Board.
Note: The above Statement and Questionnaire are part of the Proposal. Submitting this Proposal thereof shall also constitute signature of this Statement and Questionnaire. Bidders are cautioned that making a false certification may subject the certifier to criminal prosecution.
Confirmed
ITEM 9.11.
ATTACHMENT 2
[GOODFELLOW BROS. CALIFORNIA, LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT IFB No. 90056
Mills Crossing Right of Way Infrastructure Project
[GOODFELLOW BROS. CALIFORNIA, LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Invitation For Bid - Mills Crossing Right of Way Infrastructure Project
8. Subcontractors?*
Will you be using subcontractors for this project?
In compliance with the provisions of Section 4100-4114 of the Public Contracts Code of the State of California, and any amendments thereof, each Bidder shall set forth below the name and location of the place of business of each Subcontractor who will perform work or labor or render service to the Contractor in or about the construction of the work or improvement to be performed under these specifications in excess of one-half of one percent (0.5%) of the prime Contractor’s total bid or ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) whichever is greater. The prime Contractor shall list the portion of the work which will be done by such Subcontractor.
If the Contractor fails to specify a Subcontractor for any portion of the work to be performed under the Contract, the Contractor shall be deemed to have agreed to perform such portion itself, and the Contractor shall not be permitted to subcontract that portion of the work except under the conditions allowed by applicable law.
Yes
SUBCONTRACTORS*
You have indicated that you will be using subcontractors for this project. Please download the attached form, complete it, and upload it back here as part of your submittal.
• Subcontracting_Form.pdf
Mills_Crossing_Sub_Listing_GBI.pdf
9. Years of Experience Under Current Business Name*
Please state the number of years for which the Bidder has been engaged in the contracting of business under its current name. 8 10. Years of Similar Experience*
Please state the number of years of experience the Bidder has in work of a nature similar to that noted in this Bid.
ITEM 9.11.
ATTACHMENT 2
[GOODFELLOW BROS. CALIFORNIA, LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT IFB No. 90056
Mills Crossing Right of Way Infrastructure Project
[GOODFELLOW BROS. CALIFORNIA, LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Invitation For Bid - Mills Crossing Right of Way Infrastructure Project
35 11. Failure to Complete Work Satisfactorily*
Has the Bidder, as a Contractor, ever failed to satisfactorily complete a Contract awarded to it? No
12. Completed Contracts*
Provide information for at least three (3) contracts that have been satisfactorily completed by the Bidder in the last three (3) years.
For each contract, provide the following:
• Year
• Type of Work
• Contract Amount
• Owner/Agency for Whom Work Was Performed
Year: 2026, Type of Work: Overlays & AC Paving, Contract Amount: $5,245,199.00, Owner/Agency: County of Napa Year: 2026, Type of Work: Overlays & AC Paving, Contract Amount: $4,407,420.00, Owner/Agency: City of Concord Year: 2026, Type of Work: Grind Overlay & AC Repair, Contract Amount: $1,272,880.00, Owner/Agency: Town of Yountville
13. Equipment List*
Provide a list of plant and equipment owned by the Bidder, which is definitely available for use on the proposed work as required.
For each item, please provide:
• Quantity
• Name, Type and Capacity
• Condition
ITEM 9.11.
ATTACHMENT 2
[GOODFELLOW BROS. CALIFORNIA, LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT IFB No. 90056
Mills Crossing Right of Way Infrastructure Project
[GOODFELLOW BROS. CALIFORNIA, LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Invitation For Bid - Mills Crossing Right of Way Infrastructure Project
• Location
• A document with the equipment list can also be attached under the "Additional Information" question towards the end of this submittal. Please add “See Attachment in Additional Information” to the Response below.
See Attached in Additional Information
14. Bid Bond*
Please download the below documents, complete, and upload. • Bid_Bond_Updated.pdf
Mills_Bid_Bond_-_FINAL.pdf
15. IRAN Contracting Affidavit*
Please download the below documents, complete, and upload. • Iran_Contracting_Act_of_201...
IranDocMills.pdf
16. Non-Collusion Affidavit*
NON-COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT
(Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and
Public Contract Code Section 7106)
To the CITY of RANCHO CORDOVA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
The bidder confirms that they are the party making the foregoing bid and declares that the bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation. The bid is genuine and not collusive or sham. The bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a false or sham bid. The bidder has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any bidder or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or to refrain from bidding. The bidder has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference ITEM 9.11.
ATTACHMENT 2
[GOODFELLOW BROS. CALIFORNIA, LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT IFB No. 90056
Mills Crossing Right of Way Infrastructure Project
[GOODFELLOW BROS. CALIFORNIA, LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Invitation For Bid - Mills Crossing Right of Way Infrastructure Project
with anyone to fix the bid price of the bidder or any other bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other bidder. All statements contained in the bid are true. The bidder has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, to any corporation, partnership, company, association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof, to effectuate a collusive or sham bid, and has not paid, and will not pay, any person or entity for such purpose.
Any person executing this declaration on behalf of a bidder that is a corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited liability company, limited liability partnership, or any other entity, hereby represents that he or she has full power to execute, and does execute, this declaration on behalf of the bidder.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
Confirmed
17. Debarment and Suspension Certification*
The bidder, under penalty of perjury, certifies that, except as noted below, he/she or any other person associated therewith in the capacity of owner, partner, director, officer, manager:
• is not currently under suspension, debarment, voluntary exclusion, or determination of ineligibility by any Federal agency; • has not been suspended, debarred, voluntarily excluded or determined ineligible by any Federal agency within the past 3 years; • does not have a proposed debarment pending; and
• has not been indicted, convicted, or had a civil judgment rendered against it by a court of competent jurisdiction in any matter involving fraud or official misconduct within the past 3 years.
No Exceptions
18. CARB Certificate of Reported Compliance*
Is the Contractor or any sub-contractors proposing to use any vehicle and/or equipment subject to California Air Resources Board (CARB) In-Use Off-Road Diesel-Fueled Fleets Regulations (§ 2449 General Requirements)? Yes
ITEM 9.11.
ATTACHMENT 2
[GOODFELLOW BROS. CALIFORNIA, LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT IFB No. 90056
Mills Crossing Right of Way Infrastructure Project
[GOODFELLOW BROS. CALIFORNIA, LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Invitation For Bid - Mills Crossing Right of Way Infrastructure Project
CERTIFICATE UPLOAD*
Upload CARB Certificate of Reported Compliance
2026_Compliance_Cert_CARB_Off-Road_Diesel-Fueled_Fleets_Regulation_GBI_CA_LLC.pdf
19. Contractor Acknowledges NTP Date*
The Contractor acknowledges the Notice to Proceed (NTP) Date of August 31, 2026.
Yes
20. Additional Information
For any additional information requested or required by any of your previously provided answers please upload that additional documentation here.
Copy_of_2026.02.24_-_GBI_CA_Equipment_Tier_List.xlsx
21. Submittal Confirmation*
The party submitting on behalf of the Company noted on the submittal is authorized to submit on behalf of said Company and has provided any authorization showing such if required by this Bid.
In accordance with the Business and Professions Code, the party submitting does hereby, under Penalty of Perjury, certify that the following contractor’s license information is true and correct.
Confirmed
PRICE TABLES
BID SCHEDULE
ITEM 9.11.
ATTACHMENT 2
[GOODFELLOW BROS. CALIFORNIA, LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT IFB No. 90056
Mills Crossing Right of Way Infrastructure Project
[GOODFELLOW BROS. CALIFORNIA, LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Invitation For Bid - Mills Crossing Right of Way Infrastructure Project
Line Item Description Quantity Unit of
Measure
Unit Cost Total
1 Mobilization/Demobilization 1 LS $205,000.00 $205,000.00 2 Traffic Control System 1 LS $40,000.00 $40,000.00
3 Erosion Control 1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000.00
4 Storm Water Pollution Preparation Plan (SWPPP) And Implementation 1 LS $9,000.00 $9,000.00 5 Construction Staking And Preservation Of Survey Information 1 LS $21,000.00 $21,000.00 6 Sidewalk Barricades 12 EA $50.00 $600.00
7 Roadway Barricades 2 EA $200.00 $400.00
8 Roadway Excavation and Grading (F) 8,800 CY $20.00 $176,000.00 9 Remove Tree 2 EA $2,000.00 $4,000.00
10 Remove Concrete 2,310 SF $3.50 $8,085.00
11 Clearing and Grubbing 134,000 SF $0.10 $13,400.00
12 Remove Ex. Fire Hydrant 1 EA $900.00 $900.00
13 Remove Ex. Bollard 1 EA $200.00 $200.00
14 Remove Electrical/Telecom Conduits And Facilities 950 LF $4.50 $4,275.00 15 Remove Catch Basin 5 EA $700.00 $3,500.00
16 Remove Storm Drain Pipe 810 LF $17.00 $13,770.00
ITEM 9.11.
ATTACHMENT 2
[GOODFELLOW BROS. CALIFORNIA, LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT IFB No. 90056
Mills Crossing Right of Way Infrastructure Project
[GOODFELLOW BROS. CALIFORNIA, LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Invitation For Bid - Mills Crossing Right of Way Infrastructure Project
Line Item Description Quantity Unit of
Measure
Unit Cost Total
17 Remove 8" Sewer Line 90 LF $21.00 $1,890.00
18 Remove 12" Water Line 140 LF $42.00 $5,880.00
19 Remove 8" Water Line 420 LF $17.00 $7,140.00
20 Remove 4" Water Line 70 LF $17.00 $1,190.00
21 Remove 2" Gas Line 520 LF $18.00 $9,360.00
22 Removal and Abandonment Of Water Facilities 1,010 LF $20.00 $20,200.00 23 12" Reinforced Concrete Pipe (RCP) 260 LF $170.00 $44,200.00 24 4" PVC (WATER), SDR 14 70 LF $93.00 $6,510.00
24a 2" PVC (WATER), SDR 14 150 LF $41.00 $6,150.00
25 6" PVC (SEWER), SDR 26 250 LF $95.00 $23,750.00
25a 6" PVC (WATER), SDR 14 290 LF $89.00 $25,810.00
26 8" PVC (SEWER), SDR 26 100 LF $150.00 $15,000.00
27 12" PVC (WATER), SDR 14 1,950 LF $200.00 $390,000.00 28 8" HDPE (Storm Drain) 30 LF $230.00 $6,900.00
29 12" HDPE (Storm Drain) 2,520 LF $85.00 $214,200.00
30 Install 18" X 18" Concrete Drain Inlet 13 EA $3,500.00 $45,500.00 ITEM 9.11.
ATTACHMENT 2
[GOODFELLOW BROS. CALIFORNIA, LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT IFB No. 90056
Mills Crossing Right of Way Infrastructure Project
[GOODFELLOW BROS. CALIFORNIA, LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Invitation For Bid - Mills Crossing Right of Way Infrastructure Project
Line Item Description Quantity Unit of
Measure
Unit Cost Total
31 Install Drop Inlet, Type C 10 EA $5,700.00 $57,000.00 32 Install Drop Inlet, Type J 1 EA $12,000.00 $12,000.00 33 Install 48" Precast Concrete Manhole (Storm Drain) 10 EA $9,700.00 $97,000.00 34 [INTENTIONALLY REMOVED] 0 EA $0.00
35 Install 72" Precast Concrete Manhole (Storm Drain) 1 EA $13,700.00 $13,700.00 36 Install 84" Cast-In-Place Concrete Manhole (Storm Drain) 1 EA $34,200.00 $34,200.00 37 Install Box Culvert Integrated Underground System 1 EA $100,000.00 $100,000.00 38 Install 48" Pre-Cast Manhole (Sewer) 9 EA $10,500.00 $94,500.00 39 Install 48" Cast-In-Place Manhole (Sewer) 2 EA $22,000.00 $44,000.00 40 Install Sewer Cleanout 11 EA $1,100.00 $12,100.00
41 Install Fire Hydrant 5 EA $20,000.00 $100,000.00
42 Install 4" Gate Water Valve With Box 2 EA $2,700.00 $5,400.00 43 Install 6" Gate Water Valve With Box 6 EA $3,400.00 $20,400.00 44 Install 12" Gate Water Valve With Box 8 EA $8,000.00 $64,000.00 45 Blow Off Valves 5 EA $6,500.00 $32,500.00
45a Air Release Valves 1 EA $13,000.00 $13,000.00
ITEM 9.11.
ATTACHMENT 2
[GOODFELLOW BROS. CALIFORNIA, LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT IFB No. 90056
Mills Crossing Right of Way Infrastructure Project
[GOODFELLOW BROS. CALIFORNIA, LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Invitation For Bid - Mills Crossing Right of Way Infrastructure Project
Line Item Description Quantity Unit of
Measure
Unit Cost Total
46 Install Bollard [REMOVED] 0 EA $0.00
47 Install New Sign Post 13 EA $325.00 $4,225.00
48 New R1-1 Sign, "Stop" 5 EA $240.00 $1,200.00
49 New R26 (Ca) Sign, "No Parking Any Time" 6 EA $215.00 $1,290.00 50 New W84 Sign, "Speed Humps Ahead" 2 EA $270.00 $540.00 51 New W13-1p Sign, Speed Limit 2 EA $215.00 $430.00
52 Concrete Curb And Gutter 3,300 LF $30.00 $99,000.00
53 Concrete Sidewalk 7,910 SF $9.00 $71,190.00
53a Cross Gutter 1,390 SF $19.00 $26,410.00
54 ADA Curb Ramp - Case C 12 EA $2,500.00 $30,000.00
55 Class II Aggregate Base 1,600 CY $110.00 $176,000.00 56 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A) 1,700 TON $115.00 $195,500.00 57 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripes - Detail 22 Striping 1,110 LF $5.00 $5,550.00 58 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripes - Detail 27b Striping 110 LF $2.20 $242.00 59 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripes - Detail 39 Striping 920 LF $2.70 $2,484.00 60 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripes - 4" White Line 450 LF $5.50 $2,475.00 ITEM 9.11.
ATTACHMENT 2
[GOODFELLOW BROS. CALIFORNIA, LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT IFB No. 90056
Mills Crossing Right of Way Infrastructure Project
[GOODFELLOW BROS. CALIFORNIA, LLC] RESPONSE DOCUMENT REPORT Invitation For Bid - Mills Crossing Right of Way Infrastructure Project
Line Item Description Quantity Unit of
Measure
Unit Cost Total
61 Thermoplastic Pavement Markings 695 SF $14.00 $9,730.00 62 Blue Fire Hydrant Pavement Markers 5 EA $30.00 $150.00 63 Speed Table 1 EA $45,000.00 $45,000.00
64 Lower Lateral Connection To Existing Manhole 1 EA $8,000.00 $8,000.00 65 Connect To Existing Water Main 3 EA $11,000.00 $33,000.00 66 Stub Service Lateral 8 EA $500.00 $4,000.00
67 Street Lighting Plan 1 LS $135,000.00 $135,000.00
68 Hydroseeding 8.5 AC $3,100.00 $26,350.00
69 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripes - Detail 1 Striping 120 LF $2.00 $240.00 70 Slurry Seal - Type 2 11,600 SF $0.75 $8,700.00
71 8" VCP (SEWER) 1,200 LF $110.00 $132,000.00
TOTAL $3,062,316.00
ITEM 9.11.
ATTACHMENT 2
ITEM 9.11.
ATTACHMENT 2
ITEM 9.11.
ATTACHMENT 2
ITEM 9.11.
ATTACHMENT 2
ITEM 9.11.
ATTACHMENT 2
ITEM 9.11.
ATTACHMENT 2
ITEM 9.11.
ATTACHMENT 2
ITEM 9.11.
ATTACHMENT 2
January 1, 2026
GOODFELLOW BROS. CALIFORNIA, LLC
2/28/2027
1095
http://www.arb.ca.gov/doors/compliance_cert1.html
2/24/26, 11:02 AM California Air Resources Board: Off-Road Diesel-Fueled Fleets Regulation https://ssl.arb.ca.gov/ssldoors/doors_reporting/perm/php/certificate.php 1/1 ITEM 9.11.
ATTACHMENT 2
Attendees: Krist¡ne Courdy, Principal C¡v¡¡ Engineer
Edgar Medina, Assistant Public Works Director
Sindia Maya, Assistant Civil Engineer
¿/ffi;"^-ö;w1
Date
ÌV,?ÂL
P
o
N
M
L
K
J
H
G
F
E
D
c
B
A
Mills Crossing Right of Way lnfrastructure Project
Bid Summary
IJuly 16, 2026, 10:00 am, Open Gov
Tungsten Engineering Contractors, LLC
Dutch Cont¡acting, Inc.
Ghilotti ConstructiorÌ Company, Inc.
Steve P Rados, hrc.
Ghilotti Bros.. I¡c.
McGuire and Heste¡
Mütin Brothers Construction
B ad M Civil LLC
A. Teichert and Son, Inc. dba
Teichen Co¡struction
Mountain Cascade, Inc.
Marques General Engineering, Inc.
O.C. Jones & Sons, [nc.
Westem Engineering Cont¡actors
Vac Valley Excavating & Trucking Inc.
r
Desilva Gates Consmtction LLC
Goodfellow B¡oi. Califomi¿, LLC
Construct¡on Contractor
s 5,777,074.00
s 5,447,232.00
s 5,061,895.55
s 4,796,724.00
s 4,679,223.00
s 4,563,t42.00
s 4,557,007.00
s 4,503,981.00
s 4,408,393.50
s 4,2',70,328-00
$ 3,546,848.00
s 3,5 I 2,83 1.00
s 3,372,792.s0
$ 3,348,r 16.4r
s 3,12i,121.00
s 3,062,316.00
TOTAL
Deemed Non-Responsive because the contractofs DIR reg¡stration status was pending at the time of bid subm¡ss¡on, and the bid bond d¡d not meet the solicitation requirements because it was not signed.
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
X
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
o
o
at,
!6
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Iõ
Éo(J
oo
õ.
d
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
X
x
x
x
x
x
x
oø
oo
5 Eo
o
E
o¡l
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
I
E
LÐo
É,
É
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
oEGo
of
Þo> (-)
9>
trc
'¡Eãgjè
,F ^'
X
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
ONõo
EË
E*ËEeoF - (J--o
ÊsE
=Nd
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
X
bE
!o.9 !!
=à
.Þ8ø9o=aø
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
.9
d
=E
õs-åEq
oO
è9
'Tä
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
.9J
Êo
E
.g5tE
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
@
o
o
Þ
d
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
X
x
x
x
x
=o
E
Ð
5oo
o(,
z
É,
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
X
x
x
x
Ë
iE
oq
=oo
o2
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
.9
oeø
at,
odc
:oqËÈo
!tooô0
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
X
o
o
oo
E
oc)
lo
É.
0 o
.g
E.
Ê
oo
oËoe
od
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
øoÐ
g
ì
o
Io
o-,T;
Eö
cÂOFat2
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
o
d
E
oo
6 Ë
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
X
x
lå
Ø
!
o!
ITEM 9.11.
ATTACHMENT 3
PROJECT AREA MAP
N
FOLSOM LAKE COLLEGE -
RANCHO CORDOVA CENTER
LIMITS OF PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS
ITEM 9.11.
ATTACHMENT 4
MEMORANDUM
City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 2
ITEM 9.12.
DATE: August 3, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Albert Stricker, Public Works Director
Kristine Courdy, Principal Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 2026-54-1 WITH BENNETT
ENGINEERING SERVICES INC. TO INCREASE THE CONTRACT
AMOUNT FROM $81,000 TO $185,642 FOR THE MILLS CROSSING
RIGHT OF WAY INFRASTRUCTURE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS,
PERMITTING AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution.
RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adoption of the Resolution would authorize the City Manager to execute Contract Amendment No. 2026-54-1 which would result in the consultant being able to support the revitalizing of this property and maximizing the use of state grant funds before the end of the year.
BACKGROUND
The Mills Crossing Project is a proposed mixed-use development located at 10153-10179 Folsom Boulevard that was entitled in July 2025. The City of Rancho Cordova received the following grants to install infrastructure and site work that expire on December 31, 2026:
• $4.866 million in Green Means Go Grant from Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG)
• $4.0 million in Regional Early Action Planning 2.0 High Impact Transformative projects from the State of California
In September 2025, the City Council approved proceeding with constructing the infrastructure associated with the $8.866 million SACOG grant funding. On January 27, 2026, the City Council provided direction to continue moving forward with the Mills Crossing Affordable Housing project with Related California, which would create up to 60 units of multifamily housing on the eastern portion of the site along El Caprice Drive. This project subsequently submitted an Affordable Housing Sustainable Communities grant application in May 2026 and is expecting a funding decision in December 2026. Constructing the infrastructure will be a foundation for this affordable housing project and future development at the site.
City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 2
Bennett Engineering Services Inc. is a consultant on the city's pre-qualified list of Consultants for Civil Engineering Design services. Therefore, a contract was initiated with Bennett Engineering Services Inc. to finalize the Project construction documents and permitting. To complete these tasks and also assist with construction support services for the Project, Bennett Engineering Services Inc. requires additional budget.
Staff recommends approval of this contract amendment to accommodate the additional effort needed to finalize the construction documents and permitting for the Mills Crossing Right of Way Infrastructure Project by increasing the contract amount by $104,642.
FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE
Funding for this amendment is included in the Mills Crossing Capital Improvement Project budget.
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Resolution
2. Contract Amendment No. 2026-54-1
ITEM 9.12. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2026 Page 1 of 2
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
RESOLUTION NO. XX-2026
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 2026-54-1 WITH BENNETT ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC TO INCREASE THE CONTRACT AMOUNT TO AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $185,642 FOR
THE MILLS CROSSING RIGHT OF WAY INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT ENGINEERING
SERVICES
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cordova received $8.866 million in grant funding from the State of California and Sacramento Area Council of Governments to install infrastructure and site work in support of potential Mills Crossing in-fill projects that expire on December 31, 2026; and
WHEREAS, the city and Bennett Engineering Services Inc. entered into Professional Services Agreement (PSA) dated March 11, 2026 to finalize the Mills Crossing Right of Way Infrastructure Project construction documents and permitting with a contract amount of $81,000; and
WHEREAS, there are additional services required to complete the Project construction documents, permitting and construction support services; and
WHEREAS, the proposed contract amendment amount exceeds the City Manager's signing authority; and
WHEREAS, Contract Amendment No. 2026-54-1 will increase the contract amount by $104,642 to and amount not to exceed $185,642;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA does authorize the City Manager to execute Contract Amendment 2026-54-1 with Bennett Engineering Services, Inc. to increase the contract value to a not-to- exceed amount of $185,642 in a form approved by the City Attorney, for construction documents, permitting and construction support services for the Mills Crossing Right of Way Infrastructure Project.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 3rd day of August 2026 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ITEM 9.12. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2026 Page 2 of 2
ATTEST:
Garrett Gatewood, Mayor
Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk
First Amendment to Professional Services Agreement between Page 1 of 3 City of Rancho Cordova and Bennett Engineering Services, Inc.
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
BE
TWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA AND
BENNETT ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
This First Amendment to the Agreement for Professional Services (“Amendment”) is made by and between the City of Rancho Cordova (“City”) and Bennett Engineering Services, Inc., a California municipal corporation (“Professional”) as of August 3, 2026. City and Professional are hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Parties."
RECITALS
WH
EREAS, the Parties entered into a Professional Services Agreement (“PSA”) dated March 11, 2026 for the purpose of providing professional services to finalize the construction documents and permits for the Mills Crossing Right of Way Infrastructure Project (“Project”); and WHEREAS, this Amendment will increase the compensation amount by one hundred and four thousand six hundred and forty-two dollars ($104,642.00) and expand the scope of work to include the final construction documents, permitting and construction support services associated with the Project; and
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that changes to the term and services provided for in the PSA are necessary in order for the City to continue receiving services by Professional.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereto agree as follows:
AGREEMENT
1. Section 2 of the PSA, “Compensation,” provides for the City to pay Professional a sum not to exceed eighty-one thousand dollars and zero cents ($81,000.00). The Parties agree to amend Section 2 of the PSA in order to increase the compensation amount to pay Professional for additional services. The first sentence of Section 2 of the PSA is amended to read as follows:
"City hereby agrees to pay Professional a sum not to exceed One Hundred Eighty-five Thousand Six Hundred Forty-two Dollars and zero Cents ($185,642.00), notwithstanding any contrary indication that may be contained in Professional’s proposal, for services to be performed and reimbursable costs incurred under this Agreement.”
2. The document entitled “Amendment 1 Scope of Work,” attached hereto as Exhibit A, shall be incorporated into the PSA's Exhibit A.
3. All other terms and conditions in the PSA shall remain in full force and effect to the extent they are not in conflict with this Amendment.
4. The signatures of the Parties to this Amendment may be executed and acknowledged on separate pages or in counterparts which, when attached to this Amendment, shall constitute one complete Amendment.
ITEM 9.12.
ATTACHMENT 2
Contract No. 2026-54-1
First Amendment to Professional Services Agreement between Page 2 of 3 City of Rancho Cordova and Bennett Engineering Services, Inc.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment on the day and year f
irst above written.
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA PROFESSIONAL
____________________________ ______________________________ Micah Runner, City Manager Leo Rubio, President
Date:__________________ Date:__________________
Attest:
____________________________
Stacy Leitner, CMC, City Clerk
Date:__________________
Approved as to Form:
____________________________
Adam U. Lindgren, City Attorney
Date:__________________
ITEM 9.12.
ATTACHMENT 2
Contract No. 2026-54-1
First Amendment to Professional Services Agreement between Page 3 of 3 City of Rancho Cordova and Bennett Engineering Services, Inc.
EXHIBIT A
A
DDITIONAL SCOPE OF WORK SERVICES
Refer to the attached Proposal
ITEM 9.12.
ATTACHMENT 2
Contract No. 2026-54-1
AMENDMENT NO. 1 - SCOPE AND FEE FOR SERVICES
Client _________ City of Rancho Cordova
Consultant _____ Bennett Engineering Services, Inc.
Project ________ Mills Crossing, Final PS&E
Date __________ July 17,2026
C
onsultant’s services shall be limited to those expressly set forth below, and Consultant shall have no other obligations or responsibilities for the Project or to the Client except as agreed to in writing or as provided in this Agreement. All of Consultant’s services in any way related to the Project or Client shall be subject to the terms of this Agreement.
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
This amendment is to cover work that was required to complete the plans due to unknowns at the time of the original contract. These items included revisions to sewer, water, drainage, frontage improvements, specifications and estimates. Most of the additional work coincides with our original task descriptions but were exceeded due to the changes. One new task is revisions to sewer along with revisions to the sewer report.
TASK 1. PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Project management will include reviewing all conditions of approval, comments, redlines and verifying the design incorporates those items and that the design meets the satisfaction of the city, it also includes verifying budgets and resources. BENEN, as part of project management, will provide QA/QC to ensure the final product is designed to our high standards and complies with the city’s vision and standards. Project management also includes 6 meetings of an hour each to discuss project design and schedule during design.
TASK 2. REVISE ROAD PROFILES, GRADING AND DRAINAGE
Subtask 2.1. Revise Profiles
Some street profiles will need to be revised to meet Sacramento County Street improvement.
Specifically, some of the grades at the intersections have too large of a grade break and no vertical curves and conflicts with county standards. Revising these will require revisions to the grading
Subtask 2.2. Revise Grading
Grading near the revised intersection will need to be addressed. This will include checking assemblies and sub-assemblies in CAD and verifying new catchpoints, followed by feathering the catch points into the lot grading.
Subtask 2.3. Revise Drainage
Drainage will be revised based on the new road grades and any revisions to the lot grading. DI and/or SDMHs will be relocated to the new low points and tied into the system. We will coordinate with West Yost on specifics so they can prepare the drainage report.
Based on the report we will adjust or redesign the system to accommodate the recommendations and city requirements. This is limited to minor adjustment to basin sizes and outfall locations. If size increases more than 5% then our fee will be adjusted accordingly.
TASK 3. WATERLINE ADJUSTMENTS
New waterlines have a minimum separation distance. Our review on the plans noticed that some locations did not meet the minimum separation distance from the storm drainage lines.
We will revise the plans to meet current separation requirements by minimizing the need for variances form the state.
ITEM 9.12.
ATTACHMENT 2
Contract No. 2026-54-1
TASK 4. ADDRESS CITY COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL BENEN will verify all comments in the letter dated January 21, 2025, and the conditions of approval (COA) have been addressed. We are assuming the comments are the latest set of comments even though they are over a year old. This task will involve some possible redesign of the infrastructure. At this time, we do not know the full impact this large number of comments and COA’s will have on the plans.
TASK 5. ASSIST WITH PREPARATION OF SWPPP AND INSPECTIONS SWPPP includes writing the SWPPP in SMARTS, preparing the NOI, mandatory inspections (assume 7), Annual Reporting, Photo Reports, Sampling Reports (if necessary) and QSP training for the client to fulfill the remainder of state SMARTS requirements.
TASK 6. REVISIONS TO ESTIMATES, TECHINCAL SPECS, BID SUPPORT, SUBMITTAL
REVIEW, AND RFI DURING CONSTRUCTION
BENEN will prepare final estimates, prepare technical specifications, assist in the bidding procedure, review material submittals and answer/ assist in answering Request for information during construction.
TASK 7. ELECTRICAL DESIGN
Since this project uses a decorative streetlight, BENEN will use VISUAL software to prepare photometric analysis. Based on the results of photometric analysis, BENEN will prepare street lighting plans and cost estimate for 90% and 100% submittal, review material submittals and assist in answering Request for information during construction Deliverables:
• Photometric Exhibit
• Street Lighting Design Plans
• Electrical Details
TASK 8. REVISIONS TO SEWER AND SEWER REPORT
This is an added task to cover the revisions to sewer and the sewer report per Sacramento Area Sewer District markups provided to us in June.
FEES:
Our estimated fee is based on time and materials. The fee will not be exceeded without prior written notice.
AM
ENDMENT 1-Total Fee for the scope above is: $104,642
ITEM 9.12.
ATTACHMENT 2
Contract No. 2026-54-1
MEMORANDUM
City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 2
ITEM 9.13.
DATE: August 3, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Albert Stricker, Public Works Director
Edgar Medina, Assistant Public Works Director
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 2025-238-1 WITH DKS ASSOCIATES
INC. TO INCREASE THE CONTRACT AMOUNT FROM $88,000.00 TO AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $128,000.00 FOR TRAFFIC
ANALYSIS SUPPORT SERVICES OF THE RANCHO CORDOVA
ARENA PROJECT
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution.
RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adoption of the Resolution would Authorize the City Manager to execute the contract amendment and provide the Project Team with the appropriate resources to review and process the traffic analysis for the Rancho Cordova Arena Project.
BACKGROUND
The city entered into a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with DKS Associates Inc. (DKS) to provide traffic analysis support services for the proposed Rancho Cordova Arena Project located at Kilgore Road and Trade Center Drive. The current contract was administratively approved on October 31, 2025, with an amount not to exceed $88,000.
Under this agreement, DKS is responsible for reviewing and providing feedback on the project’s local traffic study, SB 743 compliance, and environmental compliance. To complete these tasks in alignment with the current project schedule, DKS requires additional time and budget.
Staff recommends approval of this contract amendment to accommodate the additional effort needed to finalize the traffic analysis support services and to increase the contract amount by $40,000.
FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE
The additional contract budget will be funded through the city's general fund.
City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 2
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Resolution
2. Contract Amendment No. 2025-238-1
ITEM 9.13. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2026 Page 1 of 1
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
RESOLUTION NO. XX-2026
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE
CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 2025-238-1 WITH DKS ASSOCIATES, INC. TO INCREASE THE CONTRACT AMOUNT TO AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $128,000.00 FOR TRAFFIC
ANALYSIS SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE RANCHO CORDOVA ARENA PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cordova is reviewing and processing a development application for the Rancho Cordova Arena Project; and
WHEREAS, the city and DKS Associates, Inc. entered into a Professional Services Agreement (“PSA”) dated October 31, 2025, and has a contract value of $88,000.00, for the purpose of providing traffic analysis support services; and
WHEREAS, the project schedule and level of effort to support the project exceeds the current contract; and
WHEREAS, the proposed contract amendment amount exceeds the City Manager's signing authority; and
WHEREAS, Contract Amendment No. 2025-238-1 will increase the contract amount by $40,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $128,000.00.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA does authorize the City Manager to execute Contract Amendment No. 2025-238-1 with DKS Associates Inc. to increase the contract value to an amount not to exceed $128,000.00 in a form approved by the City Attorney, for traffic analysis support services for the Rancho Cordova Arena Project.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 3rd day of August 2026 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Garrett Gatewood, Mayor
Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk
CONTRACT NO. 2025-238-1
First Amendment to Professional Services Agreement between City of Rancho Cordova and DKS Associates, Inc. Page 1 of 3 Revised 06/2025
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA AND DKS ASSOCIATES, INC.
Thi
s First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement ( “Amendment”) is made by and between the City of Rancho Cordova (“City”) and DKS Associates, Inc. (“Professional”) as of August 3, 2026.
City and Professional are hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties.” RE
CITALS
W
HEREAS, the City is reviewing and processing a development application for the Rancho Cordova Arena Project; and
W
HEREAS, the City and DKS Associates, Inc entered into a Professional Services Agreement (“PSA”) dated October 31, 2025, and has a contract value of $88,000.00, for the purpose of providing traffic analysis support services; and
W
HEREAS, the project schedule and level of effort to support the project exceeds the current contract; and
W
HEREAS, the proposed contract amendment amount exceeds the City Manager's signing authority; and
W
HEREAS, contract amendment 2025-238-1 will increase the contract amount by $40,000.00 to a not-to-exceed amount of $128,000.00;
W
HEREAS, the Parties agree that changes to the term and services provided for in the PSA are necessary in order for the City to continue receiving services by Professional.
NO
W, THEREFORE, the Parties hereto agree as follows:
AG
REEMENT
1. S
ection 2 of the Agreement, “Compensation,” provides for the City to pay Professional a sum not to exceed EIGHTY-EIGHT THOUSAND DOLLARS AND ZERO CENT : ($ 88,000.00), The Parties agree to amend Section 2 of the Agreement in order to increase the compensation amount to pay Professional for additional services. The first sentence of Section 2 of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:
"
City hereby agrees to pay Professional a sum not to exceed ONE HUNDRED TWENTY- EIGHT THOUSAND DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS: ($128,000.00), notwithstanding any contrary indication that may be contained in Professional’s proposal, for services to be performed and reimbursable costs incurred under this Agreement.”
2. T
he document entitled “Compensation Schedule,” attached hereto as Exhibit A, shall replace and supersede the Agreement's Exhibit A.
ITEM 9.13.
ATTACHMENT 2
CONTRACT NO. 2025-238-1
First Amendment to Professional Services Agreement between City of Rancho Cordova and DKS Associates, Inc. Page 2 of 3 Revised 06/2025
3. All other terms and conditions in the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect to the extent they are not in conflict with this Amendment.
4. The signatures of the Parties to this Amendment may be executed and acknowledged on separate pages or in counterparts which, when attached to this Amendment, shall constitute one complete Amendment.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above written.
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA PROFESSIONAL
______________________________ ______________________________ Micah Runner, City Manager Jim Damkowitch, Managing Director
Date:__________________ Date:__________________
Attest:
______________________________
Stacy Leitner, CMC, City Clerk
Date:__________________
Approved as to Form:
______________________________
Adam U. Lindgren, City Attorney
Date:_________________
ITEM 9.13.
ATTACHMENT 2
CONTRACT NO. 2025-238-1
First Amendment to Professional Services Agreement between City of Rancho Cordova and DKS Associates, Inc. Page 3 of 3 Revised 06/2025
EXHIBIT A
COMPENSATION SCHEDULE
ITEM 9.13.
ATTACHMENT 2
MEMORANDUM
City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 1
ITEM 9.14.
DATE: August 3, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Stefan Heisler, Housing Manager
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A REVISED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CONTINUUM INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM FOR 10423 OLD
PLACERVILLE ROAD AND SUPERSEDING RESOLUTION NO. 91-
2023
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution.
RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adoption of the Resolution would supersede Resolution No. 91-2023 and authorize the city's acceptance of a revised $5,581,690 Behavioral Health Continuum Infrastructure Program (BHCIP) grant award amount, commitment of a $558,169 city match, reduced from $600,000 and participation in the program for the project located at 10423 Old Placerville Road.
BACKGROUND
On June 19, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 91-2023 authorizing the city’s participation in the Behavioral Health Continuum Infrastructure Program for a grant amount not to exceed $7,000,000 and identifying the project location as 10153–10179 Folsom Boulevard.
On February 2, 2026, the City Council provided direction to adjust the project location 10423 Old Placerville Road to expand the existing WellSpace Health facility to include behavioral health services. As Advocates for Human Potential finalizes the updated Program Funding Agreement, it has requested an updated authorizing resolution reflecting the final grant award and current project location. The proposed resolution supersedes Resolution No. 91-2023 and updates the project location to 10423 Old Placerville Road, the BHCIP award to $5,581,690, and the required city match to $558,169.
FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE
The BHCIP grant award is $5,581,690 and requires a city match of $558,169.
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Resolution
ITEM 9.14. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2026 Page 1 of 2
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
RESOLUTION NO. XX-2026
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING APPLICATION TO AND PARTICIPATION IN THE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CONTINUUM INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM ("BHCIP")
WHEREAS, the California Department of Health Care Services, through its contractor Advocates for Human Potential, Inc., (“Department”) has issued a Request for Applications, dated January 31, 2022 (“RFA”), for the BHCIP Program (“Program”). The Department has issued the RFA for Program grant funds pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code Sections 5960-5960.45. Program grant funds are derived primarily from the federal Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, which was established by the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, and in part from the State of California General Fund.
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cordova, a California municipal corporation ("Applicant”), desires to apply for Program grant funds by submitting an application for Program funds ("application") to the Department for review and consideration.
WHEREAS, the Department is authorized to administer BHCIP pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code Section 5960-5960.45. Program funding allocations are subject to the terms and conditions of the RFA, the Application, Standard Agreement (“Standard Agreement”), and all other legal requirements of the Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, THAT:
1. Applicant is hereby authorized and directed to submit an application to the Department in response to the RFA, and to apply for Program grant funds in a total amount not to exceed $5,581,690.
2. If the application is approved, Applicant is hereby authorized and directed to enter into, execute, and deliver a Standard Agreement in a total amount not to exceed $5,581,690, any and all other documents required or deemed necessary or appropriate to secure the program funds from the Department and to participate in the Program, and all amendments thereto (collectively, the “program documents”)
3. Applicant acknowledges and agrees that it shall be subject to the terms and conditions specified in the Standard Agreement. Any and all activities, expenditures, information, and timelines represented in the Application are enforceable through the Standard Agreement.
Funds are to be used for the allowable expenditures and activities identified in the Standard Agreement.
4. The City Manager, or his designee (the “Authorized Signatory”), is authorized to execute the Application and the Program Documents on behalf of Applicant for participation in the Program; and Applicant further agrees and authorizes the Authorized Signatory to execute the Declaration of Restrictions and Performance Deed of Trust to be recorded against the project located at 10423 Old Placerville Road, as more particularly described in the program funding
ITEM 9.14. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2026 Page 2 of 2 agreement.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 3rd day of August 2026 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Garrett Gatewood, Mayor
Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk
City Council Staff Report – Page 1 of 4
\
MEMORANDUM
ITEM 9.15.
DATE: August 3, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Kim Juran-Karageorgiou,
Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: TREASURER’S REPORT – JUNE 30, 2026
RECOMMENDATION
This report is informational only. It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the June 30, 2026, Treasurer’s Report.
RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
The Treasurer’s Report is required to be submitted to the City Council at least quarterly in accordance with California Government Code Section 53600 et. seq. The purpose of the Treasurer’s Report is to update the City Council and the public on the status of the city’s cash balances and investments and highlight material changes from one period to another. The scope of this report covers the second quarter of the 2026 calendar year ending June 30, 2026, and is in compliance with the state’s reporting requirements.
BACKGROUND
Attached is the quarterly Treasurer’s Report for the period ending June 30, 2026. Treasurer’s Reports are provided to the City Council on a quarterly basis.
At March 31, 2026, the value of the city’s total portfolio was $474.4 million. Since that time, the city’s cash balances increased by $29.3 million with an ending market value balance of $503.7 million as of June 30, 2026. The funds are held as follows:
Investment Distribution Book Value Market Value
Cash at Banking Institutions 163,895,321 163,895,321 Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) 7,152,457 7,152,457 CAMP Pool 60,588,440 60,588,440
CAMP Managed Account 138,710,268 139,538,006
Insight Investment 133,098,472 132,552,779
Total 503,444,958 503,727,003
City Council Staff Report – Page 2 of 4
The U.S. economy remained resilient during Q2, but growth slowed as rising energy prices, high interest rates, and geopolitical tensions continued to put pressure on the economy. Consumer spending and the labor market remained strong while inflation continued to stay above the Federal Reserve's target; as such, the Federal Reserve left interest rates unchanged during the second quarter. The city’s overall portfolio continues to prioritize high credit quality and diversification, with an overall rate of return of 3.9% for the quarter.
The city’s cash balance as of June 30, 2026, was allocated by fund type/purpose as follows:
• General Fund: $30.9 million
• Community Enhancement & Investment Fund (includes Legacy reserves): $32.3 million • Sunrise Development Impact Fees (restricted for specific improvements needed as a result of development in the area): $48.9 million
• Transportation Funds: $138.8 million
• Storm Drain Fund: $29.3 million
• Capital Projects/Grant/Special Revenue Funds: $154.1 million • Agency Funds (funds held for other entities): $69.1 million
The overall portfolio is well diversified with $271.8 million invested in marketable securities, $67.7 million is invested in short-term investments that are considered liquid (LAIF, CAMP, and money markets), and another $163.9 million is on deposit with our banks, which includes $11.3 Cash at Banking Institutions
32.5%
Local Agency
Investment Fund
(LAIF) 1.4%
CAMP Pool
12.0%
CAMP Managed Account
27.7%
Insight Investment
26.3%
Investment Portfolio
City Council Staff Report – Page 3 of 4
million on deposit with one local bank as part of the city’s participation in a local banking initiative. Staff, in conjunction with our financial advisors, periodically review the mix of liquid and long-term investments and adjust the portfolio according to the market conditions and our short- term cash needs.
Staff thoroughly review investment statements and make appropriate inquiries of its investment advisors to confirm the existence and viability of the city’s assets. The city invests conservatively in investment policy options in accordance with California State Government Code. The long-term assets are in securities that can be held to maturity, thus are less vulnerable to the fluctuations of the market. All securities are in compliance with the city’s investment policy. There are sufficient funds to meet the city’s expenditure requirements for the next six months.
The distribution of investments are displayed in the following charts:
Under 1 Year
56.4%1 to 3 Years
19.3%
Over 3 Years
24.2%
Investment Ladder
City Council Staff Report – Page 4 of 4
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. City of Rancho Cordova Treasurer’s Report for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 Short Term Investment Pool
46.0%
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
22.5%
Bank Note
0.3%
Municipal
Bond / Note
0.05%
Federal Agency Commerical
Mortgage-Backed Security
11.5%
Corporate Note 14.7% Asset-Backed Security
4.9%
Allocation By Security Type
Security Held Book Value Market Value Average Yield
Wells Fargo Bank 152,585,523 152,585,523 3.6% 5 Star Bank 11,309,798 11,309,798 3.8% Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) 7,152,457 7,152,457 3.9% CAMP Pool 60,588,440 60,588,440 3.8% CAMP Managed Account 138,710,268 139,538,006 varies by holding Insight Investment 133,098,472 132,552,779 varies by holding Total 503,444,958 503,727,003
CIT
Y OF RANCHO CORDOVA
TREASURER'S REPORT
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED June 30, 2026
ITEM 9.15.
ATTACHMENT 1
ITEM 9.15.
ATTACHMENT 1
ITEM 9.15.
ATTACHMENT 1
ITEM 9.15.
ATTACHMENT 1
ITEM 9.15.
ATTACHMENT 1
ITEM 9.15.
ATTACHMENT 1
ITEM 9.15.
ATTACHMENT 1
ITEM 9.15.
ATTACHMENT 1
ITEM 9.15.
ATTACHMENT 1
ITEM 9.15.
ATTACHMENT 1
ITEM 9.15.
ATTACHMENT 1
ITEM 9.15.
ATTACHMENT 1
ITEM 9.15.
ATTACHMENT 1
ITEM 9.15.
ATTACHMENT 1
GASB 40 - DEPOSIT AND INVESTMENT RISK DISCLOSURE
As of June 30, 2026
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
Cusip S&P
rating
Moody
rating
Historical
cost
% Portfolio
hist cost
Market
value
% Portfolio
mkt value
Effective
dur (yrs)
Description Coupon Maturity
date
Call date Par value or
shares
United States Treasury Note/Bond
91282CLH2 USA TREASURY 3.75% 3.750 08/31/2026 A A+ Aa1 3,000,000.00 3,002,588.17 2.27 2,999,587.50 2.26 0.17 912828YD6 USA TREASURY 1.375% 1.375 08/31/2026 A A+ Aa1 1,000,000.00 913,909.60 0.69 995,976.56 0.75 0.17 91282CHY0 USA TREASURY 4.625% 4.625 09/15/2026 A A+ Aa1 1,150,000.00 1,160,380.81 0.88 1,151,966.68 0.87 0.21 91282CCZ2 USA TREASURY 0.875% 0.875 09/30/2026 A A+ Aa1 1,000,000.00 899,612.73 0.68 992,760.42 0.75 0.25 91282CDK4 USA TREASURY 1.25% 1.250 11/30/2026 A A+ Aa1 1,000,000.00 906,487.73 0.69 988,835.94 0.75 0.41 91282CDQ1 USA TREASURY 1.25% 1.250 12/31/2026 A A+ Aa1 1,000,000.00 904,104.91 0.68 986,752.34 0.74 0.49 91282CEC1 USA TREASURY 1.875% 1.875 02/28/2027 A A+ Aa1 1,000,000.00 922,698.66 0.70 986,123.05 0.74 0.65 91282CKR1 USA TREASURY 4.5% 4.500 05/15/2027 A A+ Aa1 3,500,000.00 3,546,496.10 2.69 3,511,689.44 2.65 0.85 91282CET4 USA TREASURY 2.625% 2.625 05/31/2027 A A+ Aa1 1,100,000.00 1,031,253.68 0.78 1,085,450.78 0.82 0.90 91282CEW7 USA TREASURY 3.25% 3.250 06/30/2027 A A+ Aa1 1,300,000.00 1,255,875.45 0.95 1,289,092.18 0.97 0.97 91282CFB2 USA TREASURY 2.75% 2.750 07/31/2027 A A+ Aa1 600,000.00 563,791.07 0.43 591,210.94 0.45 1.04 91282CFH9 USA TREASURY 3.125% 3.125 08/31/2027 A A+ Aa1 1,000,000.00 970,393.98 0.73 988,593.75 0.75 1.12 91282CFM8 USA TREASURY 4.125% 4.125 09/30/2027 A A+ Aa1 1,300,000.00 1,294,723.11 0.98 1,299,644.53 0.98 1.20 91282CFU0 USA TREASURY 4.125% 4.125 10/31/2027 A A+ Aa1 850,000.00 843,893.47 0.64 849,501.95 0.64 1.28 91282CFZ9 USA TREASURY 3.875% 3.875 11/30/2027 A A+ Aa1 1,000,000.00 987,737.73 0.75 996,054.69 0.75 1.36 91282CGP0 USA TREASURY 4% 4 .000 02/29/2028 AA+ Aa1 1,500,000.00 1,484,594.87 1.12 1,496,015.63 1.13 1.57 91282CHA2 USA TREASURY 3.5% 3.500 04/30/2028 A A+ Aa1 1,000,000.00 970,628.35 0.74 988,242.19 0.75 1.74 91282CND9 USA TREASURY 3.75% 3.750 05/15/2028 A A+ Aa1 2,250,000.00 2,244,997.77 1.70 2,233,300.77 1.68 1.78 91282CHX2 USA TREASURY 4.375% 4.375 08/31/2028 A A+ Aa1 2,100,000.00 2,105,010.94 1.59 2,108,859.38 1.59 2.02 91282CJF9 USA TREASURY 4.875% 4.875 10/31/2028 A A+ Aa1 1,250,000.00 1,275,297.16 0.97 1,269,238.28 0.96 2.17 91282CJW2 USA TREASURY 4% 4 .000 01/31/2029 AA+ Aa1 2,500,000.00 2,518,270.09 1.91 2,489,257.80 1.88 2.39 91282CKP5 USA TREASURY 4.625% 4.625 04/30/2029 A A+ Aa1 3,000,000.00 3,097,978.80 2.35 3,035,859.36 2.29 2.61 91282CES6 USA TREASURY 2.75% 2.750 05/31/2029 A A+ Aa1 940,000.00 901,007.84 0.68 903,905.47 0.68 2.76 91282CFJ5 USA TREASURY 3.125% 3.125 08/31/2029 A A+ Aa1 1,100,000.00 1,077,359.15 0.82 1,066,054.68 0.80 2.95 91282CFL0 USA TREASURY 3.875% 3.875 09/30/2029 A A+ Aa1 1,200,000.00 1,183,316.52 0.90 1,189,125.00 0.90 2.99 18 ITEM 9.15.
ATTACHMENT 1
GASB 40 - DEPOSIT AND INVESTMENT RISK DISCLOSURE
As of June 30, 2026
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
Cusip S&P
rating
Moody
rating
Historical
cost
% Portfolio
hist cost
Market
value
% Portfolio
mkt value
Effective
dur (yrs)
Description Coupon Maturity
date
Call date Par value or
shares
United States Treasury Note/Bond
91282CLR0 USA TREASURY 4.125% 4.125 10/31/2029 A A+ Aa1 800,000.00 800,690.18 0.61 798,718.75 0.60 3.07 91282CMG3 USA TREASURY 4.25% 4.250 01/31/2030 A A+ Aa1 1,250,000.00 1,277,982.70 0.97 1,252,734.38 0.95 3.24 91282CGQ8 USA TREASURY 4% 4 .000 02/28/2030 AA+ Aa1 1,430,000.00 1,442,573.15 1.09 1,421,341.79 1.07 3.33 91282CMZ1 USA TREASURY 3.875% 3.875 04/30/2030 A A+ Aa1 1,475,000.00 1,466,189.51 1.11 1,459,040.04 1.10 3.50 91282CHZ7 USA TREASURY 4.625% 4.625 09/30/2030 A A+ Aa1 1,075,000.00 1,118,045.59 0.85 1,092,552.73 0.82 3.79 91282CJG7 USA TREASURY 4.875% 4.875 10/31/2030 A A+ Aa1 2,800,000.00 2,942,306.26 2.23 2,873,609.37 2.17 3.86 91282CJM4 USA TREASURY 4.375% 4.375 11/30/2030 A A+ Aa1 3,000,000.00 3,090,361.61 2.34 3,020,273.43 2.28 3.97 Issuer total 48,470,000.00 48,200,557.69 36.50 48,411,369.80 36.52 1.99 Federal Farm Credit Banks Funding Corp
3133ENV72 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT 4.500 07/27/2026 A
A+ Aa1 1,000,000.00 998,761.20 0.76 1,000,435.64 0.75 0.07 3133EPK79 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT 4.375 12/07/2026 A A+ Aa1 1,250,000.00 1,245,867.50 0.94 1,251,583.18 0.94 0.43 3133ERK42 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT 4.125 12/16/2026 A A+ Aa1 1,500,000.00 1,494,885.00 1.13 1,500,658.67 1.13 0.45 3133ERS93 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT 4.250 01/13/2027 A A+ Aa1 1,500,000.00 1,498,710.00 1.13 1,501,983.59 1.13 0.52 3133ERGT2 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT 4.500 06/11/2027 A A+ Aa1 1,000,000.00 1,000,520.00 0.76 1,003,949.78 0.76 0.92 3133ETVJ3 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT 3.625 08/27/2027 A A+ Aa1 1,725,000.00 1,725,051.75 1.31 1,715,025.96 1.29 1.11 3133ETS81 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT 3.500 11/10/2027 A A+ Aa1 3,000,000.00 2,997,708.00 2.27 2,974,970.64 2.24 1.31 3133EN5N6 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT 4.000 01/06/2028 A A+ Aa1 900,000.00 904,194.00 0.68 898,199.78 0.68 1.43 3133ETUC9 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT 4.070 08/21/2028 08/21/2026 AA+ Aa1 1,300,000.00 1,303,055.00 0.99 1,294,580.39 0.98 1.34 3133EPUN3 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT 4.500 08/28/2028 A A+ Aa1 1,500,000.00 1,505,100.00 1.14 1,507,364.81 1.14 2.01 3133EWKC3 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT 3.875 03/27/2029 A A+ Aa1 1,700,000.00 1,699,755.34 1.29 1,685,622.91 1.27 2.54 3133ET2L0 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT 3.875 06/01/2029 12/01/2026 AA+ Aa1 1,200,000.00 1,200,000.00 0.91 1,185,368.93 0.89 1.96 Issuer total 17,575,000.00 17,573,607.79 13.31 17,519,744.28 13.22 1.23 Federal Home Loan Banks
3130APJH9 FEDERAL HOME LOAN 2.500 10/28/2026 07/28/2026 AA+ Aa1 1,300,000.00 1,178,866.00 0.89 1,294,151.77 0.98 0.32 1 9
ITEM 9.15.
ATTACHMENT 1
GASB 40 - DEPOSIT AND INVESTMENT RISK DISCLOSURE
As of June 30, 2026
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
Cusip S&P
rating
Moody
rating
Historical
cost
% Portfolio
hist cost
Market
value
% Portfolio
mkt value
Effective
dur (yrs)
Description Coupon Maturity
date
Call date Par value or
shares
Federal Home Loan Banks
3130ATUS4 FEDERAL HOME LOAN 4.250 12/10/2027 A A+ Aa1 1,200,000.00 1,206,438.70 0.91 1,200,900.04 0.91 1.38 3130ATS57 FEDERAL HOME LOAN 4.500 03/10/2028 A A+ Aa1 1,000,000.00 1,014,989.00 0.77 1,005,309.41 0.76 1.59 3130AWC24 FEDERAL HOME LOAN 4.000 06/09/2028 A A+ Aa1 1,000,000.00 999,822.81 0.76 996,909.89 0.75 1.84 3130B3W25 FEDERAL HOME LOAN 4.300 11/27/2028 A A+ Aa1 1,500,000.00 1,495,050.00 1.13 1,504,155.39 1.13 2.26 3130AVBD3 FEDERAL HOME LOAN 4.500 03/09/2029 A A+ Aa1 1,000,000.00 989,580.00 0.75 1,006,997.25 0.76 2.48 3130B1BC0 FEDERAL HOME LOAN 4.625 06/08/2029 A A+ Aa1 600,000.00 609,150.00 0.46 607,204.80 0.46 2.72 3130ATUT2 FEDERAL HOME LOAN 4.500 12/14/2029 A A+ Aa1 1,100,000.00 1,110,120.00 0.84 1,110,868.44 0.84 3.17 3130AV5P3 FEDERAL HOME LOAN 4.375 03/08/2030 A A+ Aa1 1,500,000.00 1,514,971.50 1.15 1,508,555.40 1.14 3.33 3130AWGS3 FEDERAL HOME LOAN 4.125 06/14/2030 A A+ Aa1 2,500,000.00 2,529,232.50 1.92 2,493,170.55 1.88 3.61 Issuer total 12,700,000.00 12,648,220.51 9.58 12,728,222.94 9.60 2.43 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp
3134HC3A5 FREDDIE MAC 4.5% 4
.500 06/15/2028 12/15/2026 AA+ Aa1 1,900,000.00 1,900,000.00 1.44 1,897,255.75 1.43 1.06 3134HCEN5 FREDDIE MAC 3.7% 3 .700 12/08/2028 12/08/2026 AA+ Aa1 3,000,000.00 2,998,500.00 2.27 2,968,723.20 2.24 1.76 3134HAW33 FREDDIE MAC 4.75% 4 .750 12/18/2029 09/18/2026 AA+ Aa1 1,300,000.00 1,303,575.00 0.99 1,297,503.25 0.98 1.34 3134HBW31 FREDDIE MAC 4% 4 .000 10/08/2030 04/08/2027 AA+ Aa1 1,000,000.00 999,950.00 0.76 988,088.51 0.75 2.81 3134HBX48 FREDDIE MAC 4% 4 .000 10/09/2030 04/09/2027 AA+ Aa1 3,000,000.00 2,998,377.00 2.27 2,966,709.18 2.24 2.72 Issuer total 10,200,000.00 10,200,402.00 7.72 10,118,279.89 7.63 1.96 Caterpillar Financial Services Corp
14913UAS9 CATERPILLAR FINL 4
.600 11/15/2027 A A1 1,000,000.00 999,440.00 0.76 1,004,341.05 0.76 1.32 14913UBH2 CATERPILLAR FINL 4 .150 01/08/2031 A A1 2,000,000.00 2,008,740.00 1.52 1,967,992.12 1.48 4.00 Issuer total 3,000,000.00 3,008,180.00 2.28 2,972,333.17 2.24 3.11 Bank of America Corp
06051GGA1 BANK OF AMERICA CORP 3.248 10/21/2027 10/21/2026 A- A1 1,000,000.00 963,420.00 0.73 987,846.53 0.75 1.23 2 0
ITEM 9.15.
ATTACHMENT 1
GASB 40 - DEPOSIT AND INVESTMENT RISK DISCLOSURE
As of June 30, 2026
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
Cusip S&P
rating
Moody
rating
Historical
cost
% Portfolio
hist cost
Market
value
% Portfolio
mkt value
Effective
dur (yrs)
Description Coupon Maturity
date
Call date Par value or
shares
Bank of America Corp
06051GHQ5 BANK OF AMERICA CORP 3.974 02/07/2030 02/07/2029 A- A1 1,950,000.00 1,928,725.50 1.46 1,913,281.05 1.44 2.40 I
ssuer total 2,950,000.00 2,892,145.50 2.19 2,901,127.58 2.19 2.01 US Bancorp
91159HHR4 US BANCORP 3.15% 3
.150 04/27/2027 03/27/2027 A A3 850,000.00 789,072.00 0.60 842,685.67 0.64 0.80 91159HJK7 US BANCORP 4.653% 4.653 02/01/2029 02/01/2028 A A3 2,000,000.00 2,024,360.00 1.53 2,001,399.84 1.51 1.49 I
ssuer total 2,850,000.00 2,813,432.00 2.13 2,844,085.51 2.15 1.30 Federal National Mortgage Association
3136GAK24 FANNIE MAE 4.15% 4
.150 07/11/2029 01/11/2027 AA+ Aa1 2,800,000.00 2,805,600.00 2.12 2,787,016.85 2.10 1.79 Issuer total 2,800,000.00 2,805,600.00 2.12 2,787,016.85 2.10 1.79 State Street Bank & Trust Co
857449AE2 STATE STREET BANK & TR 4.782 11/23/2029 A
A- Aa2 2,500,000.00 2,551,625.00 1.93 2,525,218.15 1.91 3.09 Issuer total 2,500,000.00 2,551,625.00 1.93 2,525,218.15 1.91 3.09 Fannie Mae Principal Strip
31358DDR2 FANNIE MAE 0% 0
.000 05/15/2030 AA+ Aa1 2,700,000.00 2,221,808.40 1.68 2,288,694.04 1.73 3.80 Issuer total 2,700,000.00 2,221,808.40 1.68 2,288,694.04 1.73 3.80 JPMorgan Chase & Co
46647PFL5 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 4.408 04/23/2030 04/23/2029 A A1 2,300,000.00 2,291,559.00 1.74 2,280,437.51 1.72 2.61 I
ssuer total 2,300,000.00 2,291,559.00 1.74 2,280,437.51 1.72 2.61 John Deere Capital Corp
24422EWD7 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL 2.350 03/08/2027 A
A1 600,000.00 553,404.00 0.42 592,590.62 0.45 0.67
24422EXT1 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL 4.850 06/11/2029 A A1 1,500,000.00 1,536,870.00 1.16 1,518,785.15 1.15 2.72 Issuer total 2,100,000.00 2,090,274.00 1.58 2,111,375.77 1.59 2.18 21 ITEM 9.15.
ATTACHMENT 1
GASB 40 - DEPOSIT AND INVESTMENT RISK DISCLOSURE
As of June 30, 2026
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
Cusip S&P
rating
Moody
rating
Historical
cost
% Portfolio
hist cost
Market
value
% Portfolio
mkt value
Effective
dur (yrs)
Description Coupon Maturity
date
Call date Par value or
shares
American Express Co
025816DG1 AMERICAN EXPRESS CO 5.389 07/28/2027 07/28/2026 A- A2 1,000,000.00 1,010,310.00 0.77 1,000,645.90 0.75 0.08 025816ET2 AMERICAN EXPRESS CO 4.444 05/03/2030 11/04/2026 A- A2 1,075,000.00 1,065,647.50 0.81 1,068,374.85 0.81 2.63 I
ssuer total 2,075,000.00 2,075,957.50 1.57 2,069,020.75 1.56 1.39 Goldman Sachs Bank USA/New York NY
38151LAJ9 GOLDMAN SACHS BANK 4.656 06/03/2029 12/03/2026 A+ A1 2,000,000.00 1,999,860.00 1.51 2,001,237.12 1.51 1.83 I
ssuer total 2,000,000.00 1,999,860.00 1.51 2,001,237.12 1.51 1.83 Eli Lilly & Co
532457DB1 ELI LILLY & CO 4% 4
.000 10/15/2028 09/15/2028 AA- Aa3 1,700,000.00 1,707,650.00 1.29 1,688,839.99 1.27 2.12 Issuer total 1,700,000.00 1,707,650.00 1.29 1,688,839.99 1.27 2.12 Toyota Motor Credit Corp
89236TDR3 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT 3.200 01/11/2027 A
+ A1 1,100,000.00 1,031,052.00 0.78 1,093,941.88 0.83 0.52 89236TKL8 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT 5.450 11/10/2027 A + A1 500,000.00 512,655.00 0.39 507,459.54 0.38 1.30 Issuer total 1,600,000.00 1,543,707.00 1.17 1,601,401.42 1.21 0.78 Colgate-Palmolive Co
194162AN3 COLGATE-PALMOLIVE CO 3.100 08/15/2027 07/15/2027 A+ Aa3 1,567,000.00 1,501,091.98 1.14 1,549,838.64 1.17 1.07 I
ssuer total 1,567,000.00 1,501,091.98 1.14 1,549,838.64 1.17 1.07 Apple Inc
037833DN7 APPLE INC 2.05% 2
.050 09/11/2026 07/11/2026 AA+ Aaa 650,000.00 609,082.50 0.46 647,549.03 0.49 0.20 037833DB3 APPLE INC 2.9% 2 .900 09/12/2027 06/12/2027 AA+ Aaa 900,000.00 850,563.00 0.64 887,267.01 0.67 1.13 Issuer total 1,550,000.00 1,459,645.50 1.11 1,534,816.04 1.16 0.74 22 ITEM 9.15.
ATTACHMENT 1
GASB 40 - DEPOSIT AND INVESTMENT RISK DISCLOSURE
As of June 30, 2026
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
Cusip S&P
rating
Moody
rating
Historical
cost
% Portfolio
hist cost
Market
value
% Portfolio
mkt value
Effective
dur (yrs)
Description Coupon Maturity
date
Call date Par value or
shares
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
48125LRU8 JP MORGAN CHASE BANK 5.110 12/08/2026 11/08/2026 AA- Aa2 1,500,000.00 1,518,600.00 1.15 1,505,292.80 1.14 0.36 I
ssuer total 1,500,000.00 1,518,600.00 1.15 1,505,292.80 1.14 0.36 Home Depot Inc/The
437076CA8 HOME DEPOT INC 2.5% 2.500 04/15/2027 02/15/2027 A A2 1,500,000.00 1,398,930.00 1.06 1,481,273.04 1.12 0.77 I
ssuer total 1,500,000.00 1,398,930.00 1.06 1,481,273.04 1.12 0.77 Morgan Stanley
61747YFA8 MORGAN STANLEY 5.123% 5.123 02/01/2029 02/01/2028 A- A1 800,000.00 800,040.00 0.61 804,860.74 0.61 1.48 61747YFF7 MORGAN STANLEY 5.449% 5.449 07/20/2029 07/20/2028 A- A1 500,000.00 515,760.00 0.39 506,618.49 0.38 1.88 I
ssuer total 1,300,000.00 1,315,800.00 1.00 1,311,479.23 0.99 1.64 American Honda Finance Corp
02665WED9 AMERICAN HONDA 4
.700 01/12/2028 BBB+ A3 600,000.00 611,328.00 0.46 600,846.44 0.45 1.43 02665WEM9 AMERICAN HONDA 5 .125 07/07/2028 BBB+ A3 700,000.00 713,811.00 0.54 706,162.63 0.53 1.85 Issuer total 1,300,000.00 1,325,139.00 1.00 1,307,009.07 0.99 1.66 Morgan Stanley Private Bank NA
61776NU43 MORGAN STANLEY PVT 4.213 02/08/2030 02/08/2029 A+ Aa3 1,200,000.00 1,199,940.00 0.91 1,184,325.38 0.89 2.41 I
ssuer total 1,200,000.00 1,199,940.00 0.91 1,184,325.38 0.89 2.41 Citibank NA
17325FBB3 CITIBANK NA 5.803% 5.803 09/29/2028 08/29/2028 A+ Aa3 1,000,000.00 1,033,740.00 0.78 1,028,834.80 0.78 2.01 I
ssuer total 1,000,000.00 1,033,740.00 0.78 1,028,834.80 0.78 2.01 Cisco Systems Inc
17275RBR2 CISCO SYSTEMS INC 4.85% 4.850 02/26/2029 01/26/2029 AA- A1 1,000,000.00 998,640.00 0.76 1,010,618.90 0.76 2.39 I
ssuer total 1,000,000.00 998,640.00 0.76 1,010,618.90 0.76 2.39 23 ITEM 9.15.
ATTACHMENT 1
GASB 40 - DEPOSIT AND INVESTMENT RISK DISCLOSURE
As of June 30, 2026
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
Cusip S&P
rating
Moody
rating
Historical
cost
% Portfolio
hist cost
Market
value
% Portfolio
mkt value
Effective
dur (yrs)
Description Coupon Maturity
date
Call date Par value or
shares
PepsiCo Inc
713448GH5 PEPSICO INC 4.3% 4 .300 07/23/2030 06/23/2030 A+ A1 1,000,000.00 998,570.00 0.76 998,655.85 0.75 3.59 Issuer total 1,000,000.00 998,570.00 0.76 998,655.85 0.75 3.59 Coca-Cola Co/The
191216CR9 COCA-COLA CO/THE 3.375 03/25/2027 01/25/2027 A+ A1 1,000,000.00 978,430.00 0.74 994,495.40 0.75 0.71 I
ssuer total 1,000,000.00 978,430.00 0.74 994,495.40 0.75 0.71 Walmart Inc
931142ES8 WALMART INC 1.5% 1
.500 09/22/2028 07/22/2028 AA Aa2 1,000,000.00 901,490.00 0.68 942,932.10 0.71 2.14 Issuer total 1,000,000.00 901,490.00 0.68 942,932.10 0.71 2.14 PNC Financial Services Group Inc/The
693475AX3 PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES 2.600 07/23/2026 A - A3 800,000.00 741,568.00 0.56 799,286.75 0.60 0.06 Issuer total 800,000.00 741,568.00 0.56 799,286.75 0.60 0.06 Cash and Cash Equivalents
CASH 0 .000 55,515.99 55,515.99 0.00 55,515.99 0.04 0.00 Issuer total 55,515.99 55,515.99 0.00 55,515.99 0.04 0.00 Grand total 133,292,515.99 132,051,686.86 100.00 132,552,778.76 100.00 1.91 24 ITEM 9.15.
ATTACHMENT 1
MEMORANDUM
City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 3
ITEM 10.1.
DATE: August 3, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Erin Naderi, Finance Analyst II
SUBJECT: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTERS 3.08 AND 4.06 OF THE
RANCHO CORDOVA MUNICIPAL CODE TO STRENGTHEN AND
ENHANCE THE CITY’S ABILITY TO ENFORCE AND COLLECT
TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX
RECOMMENDATION
Waive the first reading and introduce the Ordinance.
RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
The Ordinance would come back for a second reading and adoption at the next regular City Council meeting. Approval of the Ordinance would amend Title 3, Chapter 3.08 and Title 4, Chapter 4.06 of the Rancho Cordova Municipal Code to provide additional administrative, legal, and equitable tools for enforcement and collection of transient occupancy tax obligations.
The Ordinance would not increase or alter the city’s existing transient occupancy tax rate.
Instead, the proposed amendments would strengthen the city’s ability to collect required remittances, recover unpaid or delinquent amounts, and address amounts determined to be due through review, audit, assessment, or other enforcement action.
BACKGROUND
Title 3, Chapter 3.08
Title 3, Chapter 3.08 of the Rancho Cordova Municipal Code establishes the city’s transient occupancy tax requirements. The chapter requires hotel operators to collect transient occupancy tax from transients and remit the tax to the city. The current transient occupancy tax rate is twelve percent of the rent charged by hotel operators for the privilege of occupancy.
Transient occupancy tax is a general tax deposited into the city’s general fund and used for general governmental purposes. The city relies on timely and accurate operator reporting, collection, and remittance to ensure the tax is administered consistently and in accordance with the Municipal Code.
The proposed amendments are intended to clarify hotel operator obligations, strengthen administrative enforcement, and provide additional collection tools when an operator fails to file returns, fails to collect tax, fails to remit tax, files inaccurate or incomplete returns, provides false or fraudulent information, or otherwise fails to comply with Chapter 3.08.
City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 3
Title 4, Chapter 4.06
Title 4, Chapter 4.06 of the Rancho Cordova Municipal Code governs the issuance, renewal, and administration of general business licenses. To legally operate a hotel or other facility that rents occupancy to transients, the operator must obtain a general business license and complete the transient occupancy tax registration requirements.
The proposed amendments to Chapter 4.06 would allow the city to deny issuance, renewal, or reinstatement of a business license when the applicant or enterprise is indebted to the city for delinquent business taxes, sales or use taxes, transient occupancy taxes, or other outstanding debts owed, unless an approved payment agreement is entered into with the city.
DISCUSSION
The proposed Ordinance would amend Sections 3.08.060, 3.08.160, 3.08.180, 4.06.085, and
4.06.110. The amendments are designed to improve collection and enforcement options while maintaining the existing transient occupancy tax rate.
1. Registration. The Ordinance would require hotel operators to obtain a general business license before commencing operation and to file and maintain a transient occupancy tax registration form. The form would include hotel-related information necessary for tax administration and would require the owner or operator to attest to the accuracy of the information provided.
2. Enforcement and actions to collect. The Ordinance would clarify that any tax required to be paid is a debt owed to the city and would authorize the city to pursue administrative, legal, and equitable remedies, including cost recovery, for unpaid amounts, delinquent amounts, penalties, interest, fees, and related charges.
3. Audit findings and deficiency amounts. The Ordinance is intended to support enforcement and collection of amounts determined to be due through required remittances, return review, audit, examination, assessment, deficiency determination, or other enforcement action under Chapter 3.08.
4. Liens. The Ordinance would authorize the city, after applicable notice and hearing requirements, to place a lien on parcels subject to transient occupancy tax obligations when amounts required to be remitted or paid are not paid when due.
5. Business license remedies. The Ordinance would make business licenses issued to or associated with hotel operations subject to revocation or non-renewal for unpaid transient occupancy tax obligations and would authorize denial of issuance, renewal, or reinstatement when delinquent city debts remain unpaid, unless an approved payment agreement is in place.
6. Penalties and violations. The Ordinance would identify violations related to failure to file, collect, remit, pay, register, provide accurate information, or otherwise comply with Chapter
3.08. Violations would be declared a public nuisance and subject to applicable administrative remedies and penalties under the Municipal Code.
City Council Staff Report - Page 3 of 3
POLICY CONSIDERATIONS
The proposed amendments provide additional enforcement tools for the city while preserving the existing tax rate. The Ordinance is focused on compliance, collection, and administrative consistency. It does not impose a new tax, extend an existing tax, or increase the rate at which transients are taxed.
The amendments are intended to provide a clear process for addressing noncompliance, while preserving applicable notice, hearing, and appeal procedures before the city uses lien or other collection remedies.
FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE
There is no direct fiscal impact from a change in the transient occupancy tax rate because the Ordinance does not increase the rate. The Ordinance may result in additional general fund revenue to the extent it improves compliance, supports collection of unpaid or delinquent transient occupancy taxes, and allows the city to recover applicable penalties, interest, fees, costs, and charges.
The actual fiscal impact will depend on future compliance activity, audit findings, delinquency levels, and the city’s use of available enforcement and collection remedies.
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Ordinance
2. Updated Language Redlines
3. Updated Language Clean
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 1
Ordinance No. XX-2026 Page 1 of 6
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
ORDINANCE NO. XX-2026
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTERS 3.08 AND 4.06 OF THE RANCHO CORDOVA MUNICIPAL CODE TO STRENGTHEN AND ENHANCE THE CITY’S ABILITY TO ENFORCE
AND COLLECT TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX
WHEREAS, the Rancho Cordova City Council adopted Ordinance No. 4-2003, authorizing the imposition of the Transient Occupancy Tax (Rancho Cordova Municipal Code, Title 3, Chapter 3.08) within the City of Rancho Cordova (“city”); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 3.08, the city imposes a Transient Occupancy Tax of twelve percent of the rent charged by hotel operators for the privilege of occupancy; and
WHEREAS, the Transient Occupancy Tax is a general tax, the revenues of which are used for general governmental purposes, and placed in the city’s general fund for the usual current expenses of the city; and
WHEREAS, any operator of a hotel within the city is obligated to collect and remit the transient occupancy tax to the city, as provided in Chapter 3.08; and
WHEREAS, to legally operate a hotel within the city, a hotel operator must first file for and obtain a general business license from the tax collector, pursuant to Chapter 4.06, and then register by attesting to the information within and filing a transient occupancy tax registration form, as provided in Chapter 3.08 Section 3.08.060;
WHEREAS, the city wants to provide additional detail regarding the obligations of hotel operators, under Chapter 3.08 and Chapter 4.06, to collect and remit Transient Occupancy Tax to the city; and
WHEREAS, the City Council seeks to improve and enhance the enforcement components of Chapter 3.08 and Chapter 4.06, by amending Sections 3.08.606, 3.08.160,
3.08.180, 4.06.085, and 4.06.110 to include administrative options and penalties for the city to enforce its code provisions and recover unremitted, delinquent, or unpaid Transient Occupancy Tax, and associated fees, penalties, and charges for the collection of Transient Occupancy Tax; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments do not increase or alter the existing rate at which transients are already taxed, nor impose, extend or increase a general tax within the meaning of Article XIIC, Section 2(b) of the California Constitution, and Government Code Section 53750(e) and (h), and therefore do not require voter approval.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: Section 3.08.060 “Registration” of Rancho Cordova Municipal Code Chapter 3.08 is hereby amended to read as follows:
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 1
Ordinance No. XX-2026 Page 2 of 6
3.08.060 Registration.
Prior to commencing operation of a hotel or other facility that rents occupancy to transients, the operator of said hotel shall file for and obtain a general business license from the tax collector. In addition to the license application form, each operator shall file a transient occupancy tax registration form, provided by the tax collector, and maintain the information contained therein. The registration form will include such information as the number and rental rate of the rooms in the hotel, the name and contact information for the hotel management, and any other information deemed appropriate to the collection of the tax. The form shall also contain the following statement:
By signing this form, I represent that ____________________ is the responsible owner/operator of the hotel/facility. I warrant that the information provided herein is true and correct and acknowledge that I shall be personally liable if any of the information provided herein is determined to be false. As the owner/operator of the hotel/facility, I understand and acknowledge that a failure or refusal to remit transient occupancy tax to the city, in accordance with the municipal code and applicable laws, can lead to a lien placed against the properties subject to transient occupancy tax remittance obligations. (ord. 4-2003 § 6; ord. 12-2004 § 3)
SECTION 2: Section 3.08.160 “Action to Collect Taxes” of Rancho Cordova Municipal Code Chapter 3.08 is hereby amended to read as follows:
§ 3.08.160 Enforcement and Actions to collect A. Any tax required to be paid by any transient under the provisions of this chapter shall be deemed a debt owed by the transient to the city. Any such tax collected by an operator which has not been paid to the city shall be deemed a debt owed by the operator to the city. Any person owing money to the city under the provisions of this chapter shall be liable for an action brought in the name of the city for the recovery of such amount together with any penalty, interest, court fees, attorney’s fees and other legal fees incident thereto any time within four years after the tax required to be paid becomes due and payable.
B. The city may pursue any and all administrative, legal, and equitable remedies pursuant to RCMC 1.01.190, and any related cost recovery or enforcement activities authorized pursuant to the RCMC, and applicable local, county, and state laws, ordinances, codes, and regulations.
C. In addition to any other remedies provided by this chapter, if any amount required to be remitted or paid to the City under this chapter is not remitted or paid when due, the city may, after following notice and hearing requirements, place a lien upon each and every parcel subject to the transient occupancy tax obligations including parcels for parking, landscaping and amenities of the hotel, and record the lien on these parcels with the County Recorder’s Office, pursuant to procedures in RCMC 1.01.200. The lien remedy provided by this chapter applies to any unpaid assessment, tax, penalty, interest, or other amount lawfully due under this chapter, regardless of whether the underlying obligation arose before or after the effective date of this ordinance, provided the obligation was validly established in accordance with applicable law. The lien authorized by this chapter is intended to provide an additional remedy for the collection of existing obligations and shall not be construed to create any underlying tax liability that was not otherwise validly imposed.
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 1
Ordinance No. XX-2026 Page 3 of 6 D. In addition to any other remedies provided by this chapter, the business license issued to or associated with a hotel operation subject to this chapter, is subject to revocation or non-renewal, pursuant to RCMC 4.06.085 and 4.06.110.
[Ord. 13-2010 § 3; Ord. 4-2003 § 16].
SECTION 3: Section 3.08.180 “Penalty for Violation” of Rancho Cordova Municipal Code Chapter 3.08 is hereby amended to read as follows:
3.08.180 Penalty for violations.
A. Violations of this section are declared to be a public nuisance. It shall be a violation of this code, subject to RCMC 1.01.190 and 1.01.200, and unlawful for any person to:
a) Fail or refuse to file, in whole or in part, any return due under this chapter; or b) Fail or refuse to collect, in whole or in part, any tax due under this chapter; or c) Fail or refuse to remit or pay, in whole or in part, any tax or associated fee or penalty, when due under this chapter; or
d) File an incomplete or inaccurate return; or
e) File a false or fraudulent return due under this chapter; or f) Fail or refuse to register and maintain updated information as required under this chapter; or
g) Fail or refuse to comply with any other requirement of this chapter.
B. Any person violating any of the provisions of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punishable therefor by a fine of not more than $1,000, or by imprisonment for a period of not more than six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. In addition, the District Attorney of the County of Sacramento may pursue criminal enforcement pursuant to applicable county and state laws.
C. Any operator or other person who fails or refuses to register as required herein or to furnish any return required to be made or who fails or refuses to furnish a supplemental return or other data required by the tax collector, or who renders a false or fraudulent return or claim, is guilty of a misdemeanor, and is punishable as aforesaid. Any person required to make, render, sign or verify any report or claim who makes any false or fraudulent report or claim with intent to defeat or evade the determination of any amount due required by this chapter to be made is guilty of a misdemeanor and is punishable as aforesaid. [Ord. 12-2004 § 7; Ord. 4-2003 § 18].
D. In addition to any other remedy allowed by law, any operator who violates this section is subject to all remedies available pursuant to RCMC § 1.01.190. Any operator who violates this section is liable for all the response costs relating to the violation. Any fines pursuant to this section, if delinquent, may be recoverable by property lien or special assessment pursuant to RCMC § 1.01.200.
SECTION 4: Section 4.06.085 related to the “Issuance” of general business licenses of Rancho Cordova Municipal Code Chapter 4.06 is hereby amended to read as follows:
§ 4.06.085 Issuance.
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 1
Ordinance No. XX-2026 Page 4 of 6 The finance director shall act upon an application by denying the application or issuing a license not later than 45 days after the date a complete application is validly filed excepting where RCMC § 4.06.206 is applicable. The license shall automatically be granted and issued upon failure of the finance director to act upon an application within 45 days. An application is deemed complete and validly filed when the applicant files the application form with all information therein as provided in RCMC § 4.06.075, and the application fee, with the finance director. The finance director shall act upon the application by issuing the license unless one or more of the following situations apply:
A. The finance director or planning director finds in writing that the applicant has failed to provide information as required by RCMC § 4.06.075, and the finding cites the specific information and provision or provisions of RCMC § 4.06.075 that is applicable; or
B. The planning director finds in writing that the enterprise is, or would be, operated or maintained in a manner, or is, or would be, located on grounds, or within a building, which violates or is in violation of the laws described by RCMC § 4.06.060, and by operation of such laws, the termination of the enterprise or denial of the application is required. The findings shall specify the specific provision or provisions of law violated; or
C. With respect to an enterprise required by Chapter 4.10 RCMC to obtain a special business license, the special business license has not been issued; or
D. Pursuant to Section 16000, Subdivision (c), of the Business and Professions Code, when the applicant or enterprise holds a contractor's license, as issued by the State of California Contractors State License Board, the finance director finds in writing that the applicant does not have a valid unexpired, unsuspended, unrevoked contractor's license.
E. The finance director or planning director finds in writing that the use is a medical marijuana dispensary, or other use not permitted in the city.
F. No business license shall be issued to any applicant or enterprise who, at the time of applying therefor, is indebted to the City of Rancho Cordova for any delinquent business taxes, sales or use taxes, transient occupancy taxes, or other outstanding debts owed, unless such applicant or enterprise, with the consent of the finance director, in consultation with the City Attorney, enters into an agreement with the city to pay such delinquent taxes in monthly installments, or oftener as deemed appropriate, extending over a period not to exceed one year.
A general business license issued under this chapter shall authorize the holder thereof to operate or conduct a business enterprise only on such property the address of which is stated on the license. In the event the licensee ceases to use the property for the business, activity or enterprise listed on the license for a period of 90 days, the license shall have no further force or effect and becomes void.
(Ord. 45-2004 § 3; Ord. 38-2007 § 1 (Exh. 1(C)); Ord. 15-2013 § 5; Ord. 16-2013 § 3)
SECTION 5: Section 4.06.110 related to the “Processing and issuance – Renewal” of general business licenses of Rancho Cordova Municipal Code Chapter 4.06 is hereby amended to read as follows:
§ 4.06.110 Processing and issuance – Renewal.
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 1
Ordinance No. XX-2026 Page 5 of 6
A. An application for renewal shall be investigated and processed in the manner prescribed by RCMC § 4.06.080. The finance director shall act upon the application for renewal by issuing the license or denying the application not later than 30 days after the date a complete valid application is filed. The license shall automatically be granted and issued upon failure of the finance director to act upon the license within such 30 days.
An application for renewal is deemed complete and validly filed when the licensee files the application form, with all information therein as provided in RCMC § 4.06.105, and the application renewal fees, with the finance director. The finance director shall act upon the license renewal application within such 30 days unless the applicant has filed with the finance director, before expiration of the 30 days, written notice of a request for extension of such 30-day period on grounds that additional time is required by the applicant to prepare and present plans or other information, obtain zoning variances or other permits, remodel the premises or make other corrections necessary to comply with the laws described by RCMC § 4.06.060 or to correct nuisance disturbances or safety hazards described in RCMC § 4.06.090(B)(1). The finance director may, at his or her discretion pursuant to such a written request, extend the time within which action is required by the finance director on the application to such a period as the finance director agrees in writing is reasonable and appropriate to accomplish the corrections.
The finance director shall act upon the application for renewal within the 30-day period, or the extended period of time, as applicable, by issuing the renewed license unless:
1. A finding in writing is made that one or more of the conditions identified in RCMC § 4.06.085(A), (B), (C) or (D) pertain; or
2. The finance director or planning director find in writing that the applicant has failed to provide specific information as required by RCMC § 4.06.105, and the finding cites the specific information and provision or provisions of RCMC §
4.06.105 that is required; or
3. The finance director or planning director finds in writing that one or more conditions applicable to the preceding license at the same location have been violated, if pursuant to provisions of RCMC § 4.06.090 or § 4.06.091, or both, it is determined that such conditions shall also be applicable to the renewed license.
4. No business license shall be renewed or issued, nor shall a suspended license be reinstated, to any applicant or enterprise who, at the time of applying therefor, is indebted to the City of Rancho Cordova for any delinquent business taxes, sales or use taxes, transient occupancy taxes, or other outstanding debts owed, unless such applicant or enterprise, with the consent of the finance director, in consultation with the city attorney, enters into an agreement with the city to pay such delinquent taxes in monthly installments, or oftener as deemed appropriate, extending over a period not to exceed one year.
B. With respect to any application for renewal which is filed on or before the date of expiration of the immediately preceding license, the finance director shall extend the term of the immediately preceding license, without charge, during the period of any investigation required in order to determine whether the license should be renewed. (Ord. 45-2004 § 3)
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 1
Ordinance No. XX-2026 Page 6 of 6 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova this ___ day of ______ 2026 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
________________________________
Garrett Gatewood, Mayor
ATTEST:
Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 2
SECTION 1: Section 3.08.060 “Registration” of Rancho Cordova Municipal Code Chapter 3.08 is hereby amended to read as follows:
3.08.060 Registration.
Prior to commencing operation of a hotel or other facility that rents occupancy to transients, the operator of said hotel shall file for and obtain a general business license from the tax collector. In addition to the license application form, each operator shall file a transient occupancy tax registration form, provided by the tax collector, and maintain the information contained therein. The registration form will include such information as the number and rental rate of the rooms in the hotel, the name and contact information for the hotel management, and any other information deemed appropriate to the collection of the tax. The form shall also contain the following statement:
By signing this form, I represent that ____________________ is the responsible owner/operator of the hotel/facility. I warrant that the information provided herein is true and correct and acknowledge that I shall be personally liable if any of the information provided herein is determined to be false. As the owner/operator of the hotel/facility, I understand and acknowledge that a failure or refusal to remit transient occupancy tax to the City, in accordance with the municipal code and applicable laws, can lead to a lien placed against the properties subject to transient occupancy tax remittance obligations. (ord. 4- 2003 § 6; ord. 12-2004 § 3)
SECTION 2: Section 3.08.160 “Action to Collect Taxes” of Rancho Cordova Municipal Code Chapter 3.08 is hereby amended to read as follows:
§ 3.08.160 Enforcement and Actions to collect
A. Any tax required to be paid by any transient under the provisions of this chapter shall be deemed a debt owed by the transient to the city. Any such tax collected by an operator which has not been paid to the city shall be deemed a debt owed by the operator to the city. Any person owing money to the city under the provisions of this chapter shall be liable for an action brought in the name of the city for the recovery of such amount together with any penalty, interest, court fees, attorney’s fees and other legal fees incident thereto any time within four years after the tax required to be paid becomes due and payable.
B. The city may pursue any and all administrative, legal, and equitable remedies pursuant to RCMC 1.01.190, and any related cost recovery or enforcement activities authorized pursuant to the RCMC, and applicable local, county, and state laws, ordinances, codes, and regulations.
C. In addition to any other remedies provided by this chapter, if any amount required to be remitted or paid to the City under this chapter is not remitted or
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 2
paid when due, the city may, after following notice and hearing requirements, place a lien upon each and every parcel subject to the transient occupancy tax obligations including parcels for parking, landscaping and amenities of the hotel, and record the lien on these parcels with the County Recorder’s Office, pursuant to procedures in RCMC 1.01.200. The lien remedy provided by this chapter applies to any unpaid assessment, tax, penalty, interest, or other amount lawfully due under this chapter, regardless of whether the underlying obligation arose before or after the effective date of this ordinance, provided the obligation was validly established in accordance with applicable law. The lien authorized by this chapter is intended to provide an additional remedy for the collection of existing obligations and shall not be construed to create any underlying tax liability that was not otherwise validly imposed.
D. In addition to any other remedies provided by this chapter, the business license issued to or associated with a hotel operation subject to this chapter, is subject to revocation or non-renewal, pursuant to RCMC 4.06.085 and 4.06.110.
[Ord. 13-2010 § 3; Ord. 4-2003 § 16].
SECTION 3: Section 3.08.180 “Penalty for Violation” of Rancho Cordova Municipal Code Chapter 3.08 is hereby amended to read as follows:
3.08.180 Penalty for violations.
A. Violations of this section are declared to be a public nuisance. It shall be a violation of this code, subject to RCMC 1.01.190 and 1.01.200, and unlawful for any person to:
a) Fail or refuse to file, in whole or in part, any return due under this chapter; or
b) Fail or refuse to collect, in whole or in part, any tax due under this chapter; or
c) Fail or refuse to remit or pay, in whole or in part, any tax or associated fee or penalty, when due under this chapter; or
d) File an incomplete or inaccurate return; or
e) File a false or fraudulent return due under this chapter; or f) Fail or refuse to register and maintain updated information as required under this chapter; or
g) Fail or refuse to comply with any other requirement of this chapter.
B. Any person violating any of the provisions of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punishable therefor by a fine of not more than $1,000, or by imprisonment for a period of not more than six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. In addition, the District Attorney of the County of Sacramento may pursue criminal enforcement pursuant to applicable county and state laws.
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 2
C. Any operator or other person who fails or refuses to register as required herein or to furnish any return required to be made or who fails or refuses to furnish a supplemental return or other data required by the tax collector, or who renders a false or fraudulent return or claim, is guilty of a misdemeanor, and is punishable as aforesaid. Any person required to make, render, sign or verify any report or claim who makes any false or fraudulent report or claim with intent to defeat or evade the determination of any amount due required by this chapter to be made is guilty of a misdemeanor and is punishable as aforesaid. [Ord. 12- 2004 § 7; Ord. 4-2003 § 18].
D. In addition to any other remedy allowed by law, any operator who violates this section is subject to all remedies available pursuant to RCMC § 1.01.190. Any operator who violates this section is liable for all the response costs relating to the violation. Any fines pursuant to this section, if delinquent, may be recoverable by property lien or special assessment pursuant to RCMC § 1.01.200.
SECTION 4: Section 4.06.085 related to the “Issuance” of general business licenses of Rancho Cordova Municipal Code Chapter 4.06 is hereby amended to read as follows:
§ 4.06.085 Issuance.
The finance director shall act upon an application by denying the application or issuing a license not later than 45 days after the date a complete application is validly filed excepting where RCMC § 4.06.206 is applicable. The license shall automatically be granted and issued upon failure of the finance director to act upon an application within 45 days. An application is deemed complete and validly filed when the applicant files the application form with all information therein as provided in RCMC § 4.06.075, and the application fee, with the finance director. The finance director shall act upon the application by issuing the license unless one or more of the following situations apply:
A. The finance director or planning director finds in writing that the applicant has failed to provide information as required by RCMC § 4.06.075, and the finding cites the specific information and provision or provisions of RCMC § 4.06.075 that is applicable; or
B. The planning director finds in writing that the enterprise is, or would be, operated or maintained in a manner, or is, or would be, located on grounds, or within a building, which violates or is in violation of the laws described by RCMC § 4.06.060, and by operation of such laws, the termination of the enterprise or denial of the application is required. The findings shall specify the specific provision or provisions of law violated; or
C. With respect to an enterprise required by Chapter 4.10 RCMC to obtain a special business license, the special business license has not been issued; or
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 2
D. Pursuant to Section 16000, Subdivision (c), of the Business and Professions Code, when the applicant or enterprise holds a contractor's license, as issued by the State of California Contractors State License Board, the finance director finds in writing that the applicant does not have a valid unexpired, unsuspended, unrevoked contractor's license.
E. The finance director or planning director finds in writing that the use is a medical marijuana dispensary, or other use not permitted in the city.
F. No business license shall be issued to any applicant or enterprise who, at the time of applying therefor, is indebted to the City of Rancho Cordova for any delinquent business taxes, sales or use taxes, transient occupancy taxes, or other outstanding debts owed, unless such applicant or enterprise, with the consent of the finance director, in consultation with the city attorney, enters into an agreement with the City to pay such delinquent taxes in monthly installments, or oftener as deemed appropriate, extending over a period not to exceed one year.
A general business license issued under this chapter shall authorize the holder thereof to operate or conduct a business enterprise only on such property the address of which is stated on the license. In the event the licensee ceases to use the property for the business, activity or enterprise listed on the license for a period of 90 days, the license shall have no further force or effect and becomes void.
(Ord. 45-2004 § 3; Ord. 38-2007 § 1 (Exh. 1(C)); Ord. 15-2013 § 5; Ord. 16-2013 § 3)
SECTION 5: Section 4.06.110 related to the “Processing and issuance – Renewal” of general business licenses of Rancho Cordova Municipal Code Chapter 4.06 is hereby amended to read as follows:
§ 4.06.110 Processing and issuance – Renewal.
A. An application for renewal shall be investigated and processed in the manner prescribed by RCMC § 4.06.080. The finance director shall act upon the application for renewal by issuing the license or denying the application not later than 30 days after the date a complete valid application is filed. The license shall automatically be granted and issued upon failure of the finance director to act upon the license within such 30 days. An application for renewal is deemed complete and validly filed when the licensee files the application form, with all information therein as provided in RCMC § 4.06.105, and the application renewal fees, with the finance director. The finance director shall act upon the license renewal application within such 30 days unless the applicant has filed with the finance director, before expiration of the 30 days, written notice of a request for extension of such 30-day period on grounds that additional time is required by the applicant to prepare and present plans or other information, obtain zoning
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 2
variances or other permits, remodel the premises or make other corrections necessary to comply with the laws described by RCMC § 4.06.060 or to correct nuisance disturbances or safety hazards described in RCMC § 4.06.090(B)(1).
The finance director may, at his or her discretion pursuant to such a written request, extend the time within which action is required by the finance director on the application to such a period as the finance director agrees in writing is reasonable and appropriate to accomplish the corrections. The finance director shall act upon the application for renewal within the 30-day period, or the extended period of time, as applicable, by issuing the renewed license unless:
1. A finding in writing is made that one or more of the conditions identified in RCMC § 4.06.085(A), (B), (C) or (D) pertain; or
2. The finance director or planning director find in writing that the applicant has failed to provide specific information as required by RCMC § 4.06.105, and the finding cites the specific information and provision or provisions of RCMC § 4.06.105 that is required; or
3. The finance director or planning director finds in writing that one or more conditions applicable to the preceding license at the same location have been violated, if pursuant to provisions of RCMC § 4.06.090 or §
4.06.091, or both, it is determined that such conditions shall also be applicable to the renewed license.
4. No business license shall be renewed or issued, nor shall a suspended license be reinstated, to any applicant or enterprise who, at the time of applying therefor, is indebted to the City of Rancho Cordova for any delinquent business taxes, sales or use taxes, transient occupancy taxes, or other outstanding debts owed, unless such applicant or enterprise, with the consent of the finance director, in consultation with the city attorney, enters into an agreement with the City to pay such delinquent taxes in monthly installments, or oftener as deemed appropriate, extending over a period not to exceed one year.
B. With respect to any application for renewal which is filed on or before the date of expiration of the immediately preceding license, the finance director shall extend the term of the immediately preceding license, without charge, during the period of any investigation required in order to determine whether the license should be renewed.
(Ord. 45-2004 § 3)
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 3
SECTION 1: Section 3.08.060 “Registration” of Rancho Cordova Municipal Code Chapter 3.08 is hereby amended to read as follows:
3.08.060 Registration.
Prior to commencing operation of a hotel or other facility that rents occupancy to transients, the operator of said hotel shall file for and obtain a general business license from the tax collector. In addition to the license application form, each operator shall file a transient occupancy tax registration form, provided by the tax collector, and maintain the information contained therein. The registration form will include such information as the number and rental rate of the rooms in the hotel, the name and contact information for the hotel management, and any other information deemed appropriate to the collection of the tax. The form shall also contain the following statement:
By signing this form, I represent that ____________________ is the responsible owner/operator of the hotel/facility. I warrant that the information provided herein is true and correct and acknowledge that I shall be personally liable if any of the information provided herein is determined to be false. As the owner/operator of the hotel/facility, I understand and acknowledge that a failure or refusal to remit transient occupancy tax to the City, in accordance with the municipal code and applicable laws, can lead to a lien placed against the properties subject to transient occupancy tax remittance obligations. (ord. 4- 2003 § 6; ord. 12-2004 § 3)
SECTION 2: Section 3.08.160 “Action to Collect Taxes” of Rancho Cordova Municipal Code Chapter 3.08 is hereby amended to read as follows:
§ 3.08.160 Enforcement and Actions to collect
A. Any tax required to be paid by any transient under the provisions of this chapter shall be deemed a debt owed by the transient to the city. Any such tax collected by an operator which has not been paid to the city shall be deemed a debt owed by the operator to the city. Any person owing money to the city under the provisions of this chapter shall be liable for an action brought in the name of the city for the recovery of such amount together with any penalty, interest, court fees, attorney’s fees and other legal fees incident thereto any time within four years after the tax required to be paid becomes due and payable.
B. The city may pursue any and all administrative, legal, and equitable remedies pursuant to RCMC 1.01.190, and any related cost recovery or enforcement activities authorized pursuant to the RCMC, and applicable local, county, and state laws, ordinances, codes, and regulations.
C. In addition to any other remedies provided by this chapter, if any amount required to be remitted or paid to the City under this chapter is not remitted or
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 3
paid when due, the city may, after following notice and hearing requirements, place a lien upon each and every parcel subject to the transient occupancy tax obligations including parcels for parking, landscaping and amenities of the hotel, and record the lien on these parcels with the County Recorder’s Office, pursuant to procedures in RCMC 1.01.200. The lien remedy provided by this chapter applies to any unpaid assessment, tax, penalty, interest, or other amount lawfully due under this chapter, regardless of whether the underlying obligation arose before or after the effective date of this ordinance, provided the obligation was validly established in accordance with applicable law. The lien authorized by this chapter is intended to provide an additional remedy for the collection of existing obligations and shall not be construed to create any underlying tax liability that was not otherwise validly imposed.
D. In addition to any other remedies provided by this chapter, the business license issued to or associated with a hotel operation subject to this chapter, is subject to revocation or non-renewal, pursuant to RCMC 4.06.085 and 4.06.110.
[Ord. 13-2010 § 3; Ord. 4-2003 § 16].
SECTION 3: Section 3.08.180 “Penalty for Violation” of Rancho Cordova Municipal Code Chapter 3.08 is hereby amended to read as follows:
3.08.180 Penalty for violations.
A. Violations of this section are declared to be a public nuisance. It shall be a violation of this code, subject to RCMC 1.01.190 and 1.01.200, and unlawful for any person to:
a) Fail or refuse to file, in whole or in part, any return due under this chapter; or
b) Fail or refuse to collect, in whole or in part, any tax due under this chapter; or
c) Fail or refuse to remit or pay, in whole or in part, any tax or associated fee or penalty, when due under this chapter; or
d) File an incomplete or inaccurate return; or
e) File a false or fraudulent return due under this chapter; or f) Fail or refuse to register and maintain updated information as required under this chapter; or
g) Fail or refuse to comply with any other requirement of this chapter.
B. Any person violating any of the provisions of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punishable therefor by a fine of not more than $1,000, or by imprisonment for a period of not more than six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. In addition, the District Attorney of the County of Sacramento may pursue criminal enforcement pursuant to applicable county and state laws.
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 3
C. Any operator or other person who fails or refuses to register as required herein or to furnish any return required to be made or who fails or refuses to furnish a supplemental return or other data required by the tax collector, or who renders a false or fraudulent return or claim, is guilty of a misdemeanor, and is punishable as aforesaid. Any person required to make, render, sign or verify any report or claim who makes any false or fraudulent report or claim with intent to defeat or evade the determination of any amount due required by this chapter to be made is guilty of a misdemeanor and is punishable as aforesaid. [Ord. 12- 2004 § 7; Ord. 4-2003 § 18].
D. In addition to any other remedy allowed by law, any operator who violates this section is subject to all remedies available pursuant to RCMC § 1.01.190. Any operator who violates this section is liable for all the response costs relating to the violation. Any fines pursuant to this section, if delinquent, may be recoverable by property lien or special assessment pursuant to RCMC § 1.01.200.
SECTION 4: Section 4.06.085 related to the “Issuance” of general business licenses of Rancho Cordova Municipal Code Chapter 4.06 is hereby amended to read as follows:
§ 4.06.085 Issuance.
The finance director shall act upon an application by denying the application or issuing a license not later than 45 days after the date a complete application is validly filed excepting where RCMC § 4.06.206 is applicable. The license shall automatically be granted and issued upon failure of the finance director to act upon an application within 45 days. An application is deemed complete and validly filed when the applicant files the application form with all information therein as provided in RCMC § 4.06.075, and the application fee, with the finance director. The finance director shall act upon the application by issuing the license unless one or more of the following situations apply:
A. The finance director or planning director finds in writing that the applicant has failed to provide information as required by RCMC § 4.06.075, and the finding cites the specific information and provision or provisions of RCMC § 4.06.075 that is applicable; or
B. The planning director finds in writing that the enterprise is, or would be, operated or maintained in a manner, or is, or would be, located on grounds, or within a building, which violates or is in violation of the laws described by RCMC § 4.06.060, and by operation of such laws, the termination of the enterprise or denial of the application is required. The findings shall specify the specific provision or provisions of law violated; or
C. With respect to an enterprise required by Chapter 4.10 RCMC to obtain a special business license, the special business license has not been issued; or
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 3
D. Pursuant to Section 16000, Subdivision (c), of the Business and Professions Code, when the applicant or enterprise holds a contractor's license, as issued by the State of California Contractors State License Board, the finance director finds in writing that the applicant does not have a valid unexpired, unsuspended, unrevoked contractor's license.
E. The finance director or planning director finds in writing that the use is a medical marijuana dispensary, or other use not permitted in the city.
F. No business license shall be issued to any applicant or enterprise who, at the time of applying therefor, is indebted to the City of Rancho Cordova for any delinquent business taxes, sales or use taxes, transient occupancy taxes, or other outstanding debts owed, unless such applicant or enterprise, with the consent of the finance director, in consultation with the city attorney, enters into an agreement with the City to pay such delinquent taxes in monthly installments, or oftener as deemed appropriate, extending over a period not to exceed one year.
A general business license issued under this chapter shall authorize the holder thereof to operate or conduct a business enterprise only on such property the address of which is stated on the license. In the event the licensee ceases to use the property for the business, activity or enterprise listed on the license for a period of 90 days, the license shall have no further force or effect and becomes void.
(Ord. 45-2004 § 3; Ord. 38-2007 § 1 (Exh. 1(C)); Ord. 15-2013 § 5; Ord. 16-2013 § 3)
SECTION 5: Section 4.06.110 related to the “Processing and issuance – Renewal” of general business licenses of Rancho Cordova Municipal Code Chapter 4.06 is hereby amended to read as follows:
§ 4.06.110 Processing and issuance – Renewal.
A. An application for renewal shall be investigated and processed in the manner prescribed by RCMC § 4.06.080. The finance director shall act upon the application for renewal by issuing the license or denying the application not later than 30 days after the date a complete valid application is filed. The license shall automatically be granted and issued upon failure of the finance director to act upon the license within such 30 days. An application for renewal is deemed complete and validly filed when the licensee files the application form, with all information therein as provided in RCMC § 4.06.105, and the application renewal fees, with the finance director. The finance director shall act upon the license renewal application within such 30 days unless the applicant has filed with the finance director, before expiration of the 30 days, written notice of a request for extension of such 30-day period on grounds that additional time is required by the applicant to prepare and present plans or other information, obtain zoning
ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 3
variances or other permits, remodel the premises or make other corrections necessary to comply with the laws described by RCMC § 4.06.060 or to correct nuisance disturbances or safety hazards described in RCMC § 4.06.090(B)(1).
The finance director may, at his or her discretion pursuant to such a written request, extend the time within which action is required by the finance director on the application to such a period as the finance director agrees in writing is reasonable and appropriate to accomplish the corrections. The finance director shall act upon the application for renewal within the 30-day period, or the extended period of time, as applicable, by issuing the renewed license unless:
1. A finding in writing is made that one or more of the conditions identified in RCMC § 4.06.085(A), (B), (C) or (D) pertain; or
2. The finance director or planning director find in writing that the applicant has failed to provide specific information as required by RCMC § 4.06.105, and the finding cites the specific information and provision or provisions of RCMC § 4.06.105 that is required; or
3. The finance director or planning director finds in writing that one or more conditions applicable to the preceding license at the same location have been violated, if pursuant to provisions of RCMC § 4.06.090 or §
4.06.091, or both, it is determined that such conditions shall also be applicable to the renewed license.
4. No business license shall be renewed or issued, nor shall a suspended license be reinstated, to any applicant or enterprise who, at the time of applying therefor, is indebted to the City of Rancho Cordova for any delinquent business taxes, sales or use taxes, transient occupancy taxes, or other outstanding debts owed, unless such applicant or enterprise, with the consent of the finance director, in consultation with the city attorney, enters into an agreement with the City to pay such delinquent taxes in monthly installments, or oftener as deemed appropriate, extending over a period not to exceed one year.
B. With respect to any application for renewal which is filed on or before the date of expiration of the immediately preceding license, the finance director shall extend the term of the immediately preceding license, without charge, during the period of any investigation required in order to determine whether the license should be renewed.
(Ord. 45-2004 § 3)
MEMORANDUM
City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 5
ITEM 10.2.
DATE: August 3, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Rachel Trinh, Development Senior Analyst
SUBJECT: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 16, CHAPTER 16.82
ESTABLISHMENT OF THE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES TO
FINANCE THE COST OF PUBLIC FACILITIES WITHIN THE
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN AREA AND A RESOLUTION
APPROVING THE SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT
IMPACT FEE PROGRAM NEXUS STUDY AND FEE SCHEDULE
UPDATE
RECOMMENDATION
Waive the first reading and introduce the Ordinance adopt the Resolution.
RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
The actions will result in implementation of the updated SunCreek Specific Plan Development Impact Fee Program and the Ordinance will come back for a second reading and adoption at the next regular City Council meeting.
BACKGROUND
On November 18, 2013, by Resolution No. 128-2013, the City Council approved General Plan Amendments to the Land Use Element and the Open Space Element for the SunCreek Specific Plan; made findings regarding the environmental review required the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and approved the Public Facilities Finance Plan (the “Finance Plan”) for the SunCreek Specific Plan, Figure 1: SunCreek Specific Plan Location.
The Finance Plan calls for the implementation of a SunCreek Specific Plan (“SCSP”) Development Impact Fee Program to finance backbone infrastructure and public facilities including on-site roadways, off-site roadways, sewer improvements, water improvements, drainage improvements, wetland mitigation for backbone infrastructure, park corridors and trails, wetland preserve buffers, and plan area formation costs.
On May 16, 2022, by Resolution No. 77-2022, the City Council adopted the SCSP Nexus Study and the SCSP Development Impact Fee Program and on June 6, 2022, by Ordinance No. 9- 2022, the City Council adopted an Ordinance adding Chapter 16.82 “SunCreek Specific Plan Development Impact Fees” to the Rancho Cordova Municipal Code, establishing development impact fees to finance the cost of public facilities within the SunCreek Specific Plan Area.
City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 5
In 2021, the State approved Assembly Bill No. 602 (AB 602) that took effect on and after January 2022, which modified the Mitigation Fee Act and stipulated that a jurisdiction must calculate residential fees proportionately to the square footage of the dwelling units. AB 602 also codified as Government Code Section 66016.5. This section is both declaratory of previously existing law and adds certain new requirements. Section 66016.5(a)(5)(A) required that nexus study adopted after July 1, 2022, shall calculate a fee imposed on a housing development project proportionately to the square footage of proposed units of the development. In addition to AB 602, the State also passed Senate Bill 13 (SB13) in 2019, restricting local agency on imposing any impact fee upon development of accessory dwelling units (ADUs) less than 750 square feet. For ADUs that are 750 square feet or more, the fees collected shall be proportionately in relation to the square footage of the primary dwelling unit.
Figure 1: SunCreek Specific Plan Location
Discussion
Staff worked with Economic & Planning System Inc., a land economics consulting firm, to prepare an update to the SCSP Nexus Study (Nexus Study Update) to address AB 602 requirements. Currently, the SCSP Nexus Study includes the following fee components:
• Roadway
• Potable Water
• Storm Drainage
• Wetland Mitigation for Backbone Infrastructure
• Park Corridors and Trails
• Wetland Preserve Buffer
• Plan Area Formation
• Administration
Of the fee components above, roadways, park corridors and trails, and administration are the fee components with residential fees calculated proportionately to dwelling unit size that the Nexus Study Update is addressing. Administration fee is calculated as three percent of the sum of all other fees. The roadways, park corridors and trails, and administration fee categories are comprised of four major unit types, single-family, multifamily, age-restricted single-family, and
City Council Staff Report - Page 3 of 5
age-restricted multi-family. Each of these unit type has five different size categories shown below.
• Very Small: less than or equal to 800 sq. ft.
• Small: 801 to 1,200 sq. ft.
• Medium Small: 1,201 to 1,600 sq. ft.
• Medium: 1,601 to 2,400 sq. ft.
• Large: greater than 2,400 sq. ft.
Roadways fees are calculated using dwelling unit equivalent (DUE) factors, established by daily vehicle miles traveled (VMT), which combines daily trips per household and trip length, to measure relative demand for roadway infrastructure by land use. These data show a pattern of increasing as dwelling unit size increases. Thus, implementing the fee based on ranges of building square feet for residential development bears a reasonable relationship between the fee charged and the burden posed by the development because units that fall in the lower building unit size range pay a lower fee than units that fall in a higher building unit size range, which is proportional to the estimated number of people per household by unit size within each size range.
Park corridors and trails fees, also referred to as trails fees, are calculated using DUE factors that are established by population, as measured by person per household to estimate the relative demand for trails by land use. Like Roadway fees, the number of people per household shows a pattern of increasing as unit size increases. Therefore, implementation of the fee based on ranges of building square feet is reasonable as lower fee will apply to lower building unit size and higher fee will apply to higher building unit size range.
Potable water is specifically exempt from the requirements of Government Code Section 66016.5, codified by AB 602. Section 66016.5 also allowed for exemption to the square footage allocation method for other backbone infrastructure fee components if findings are made.
As such, below are the explanations as to why square footage is not an appropriate metric to calculate the remaining fees (storm drainage, wetland mitigation, wetland preserve buffer, and plan area formation) imposed on a housing development project.
Storm Drainage
This fee is calculated based on storm water runoff from new impervious surfaces, i.e. footprint of roof area, driveways, sidewalks, patios, etc. and a square footage of proposed units basis would introduce inequalities, meaning two-story home with the same footprint as a single-story would pay twice the fee while causing an identical impact on the drainage system.
Wetland Mitigation for Backbone Infrastructure
It is assumed that each acre of residential and commercial development, regardless of the development type or size, will result in an approximately equal need for backbone infrastructure and will result in the same wetlands disturbance that must be mitigated.
Wetland Preserve Buffer
A residential fee based on unit type would be equitable because each unit type, regardless of square footage, would have approximately the same acreage and the same impact on the disturbance of wetlands and need for wetland preserve buffers.
City Council Staff Report - Page 4 of 5
Plan Area Formation
A residential fee based on unit type would be more equitable because each unit type, regardless of square footage, would have approximately the same acreage and the same impact on the need for plan area formation studies.
Summary of the Nexus Study Update Fees
A complete list of the individual fee components by land use type for the SCSP Fee Program is contained in Attachment 3, Exhibit B to the Resolution and is referred to as the SCSP Fee Schedule. The fee comparison table below shows the difference between the proposed fees and the current fees. Some of the proposed fees are lower due to a portion of the backbone infrastructures that have been constructed by the Grantline 220 Project. The updated fees will become effective 60 days after adoption.
FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE
There is no fiscal impact on the general fund. Funds collected pursuant to the SCSP Fee Program will be used to fund specific facility costs as specified in the SCSP Nexus Study.
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Resolution
2. Exhibit A to the Resolution (Nexus Study Update)
3. Exhibit B to the Resolution (Fee Schedule)
City Council Staff Report - Page 5 of 5
4. Exhibit C to the Resolution (SCSP Boundary)
5. Ordinance
6. Exhibit A to Ordinance
7. Chapter 16.82 Track Changes
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2026 Page 1 of 3
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
RESOLUTION NO. XX-2026
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT
IMPACT FEE PROGRAM NEXUS STUDY UPDATE AND FEE SCHEDULE
WHEREAS, on May 16, 2022, by Resolution No. 77-2022, the City Council adopted the SunCreek Specific Plan Nexus Study (SCSP Nexus Study) and the SunCreek Specific Plan Impact Fee Program to fund the required on-site and off-site roadways, water improvements, drainage improvements, wetland mitigation for backbone infrastructure, park corridors and trails, and wetland preserve buffers to serve the development in the SunCreek Specific Plan, as well as defray the costs of fee program formation and routine administration of the SCSP Impact Fee Program and is by this reference incorporated herein; and
WHEREAS, on June 6, 2022, by Ordinance No. 9-2022, the City Council added Chapter
16.82 “SunCreek Specific Plan Development Impact Fees” to the Rancho Cordova Municipal Code, establishing development impact fees to finance the cost of public facilities within the SunCreek Specific Plan Area; and
WHEREAS , the State approved Assembly Bill No. 602 (AB 602), which modified the Mitigation Fee Act and stipulated that a jurisdiction must calculate residential fees proportionately to the square footage of the dwelling units; and
WHEREAS , staff have engaged Economic & Planning Systems, Inc., to prepare an update to the SCSP Nexus Study, to comply with AB 602’s impact fees calculation requirements; and
WHEREAS , Government Code Sections 66000, et. Seq., requires that a local agency hold a noticed public hearing, at which oral or written presentations can be made, prior to the adoption of a resolution approving a Nexus Study Update; and
WHEREAS, public notice was provided as required by law and a public hearing was held on August 3, 2026, so that the City Council could consider all written and oral testimony prior to taking action on this matter; and
WHEREAS , this project is statutorily exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Pub. Res. Code Section 21080(b)(8)(D) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15273(a)(4) because it involves the establishment of a public agency fee for the purpose of obtaining funds for capital projects necessary to maintain services that are already planned for the SunCreek Specific Plan, which is within the City’s existing service area. The nature of the facilities planned as part of the Capital Improvement Plan were addressed by the SunCreek Environmental Impact Report certified by the City Council on November 18, 2013. Additional environmental review will be required for those projects subject to CEQA when site-specific plans are prepared.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA does hereby adopt the findings in Section 1 below, and take the action enumerated under Section 2 below:
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2026 Page 2 of 3
Section 1. Findings
The foregoing recitals and the accompanying staff report dated August 3, 2026, are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated by reference.
The purpose of the SCSP Fee Program is to ensure that development within the SunCreek Specific Plan is capable of being provided, within a reasonable period of time, with adequate levels of backbone infrastructure and facilities, including on-site and off-site roadways, water improvements, drainage improvements, wetland mitigation for backbone infrastructure, park corridors and trails, and wetland preserve buffers to serve the development in the SunCreek Specific Plan.
The SCSP on-site roadway, off-site roadway, potable water, storm drainage, wetland mitigation for backbone infrastructure, park corridors and trails, wetland preserve buffer, and plan area formation fees will be used to fund the roadway, water, storm drainage, wetland mitigation, park corridors and trails, and wetland preserve buffer facilities identified in the SunCreek Specific Plan, the Finance Plan and the Capital Improvement Program contained in the SCSP Nexus Study all of which are incorporated herein by reference. These facilities are necessary to meet the demand of, and to offset the environmental impacts associated with, new residential and commercial development in the SunCreek Specific Plan area.
There is a reasonable relationship between the use of the SCSP onsite roadway, off-site roadway, potable water, storm drainage, wetland mitigation for backbone infrastructure, park corridors and trails, wetland preserve buffer, and plan area formation fees and the type of development projects on which the fees are imposed because fee revenues collected from residential and non-residential land uses will be used to fund a fair-share portion of the cost to construct and/or acquire roadway, water, storm drainage, park corridors and trails, wetland buffer and pay wetland mitigation fees for backbone infrastructure.
There is a reasonable relationship between the need of the public facilities to be financed by the SCSP on-site roadway, off-site roadway, potable water, storm drainage, wetland mitigation for backbone infrastructure, park corridors and trails, wetland preserve buffer, and plan area formation fees and the type of development on which the fees are imposed because the residential and non-residential development in the SDCP area will generate new residents and employees who will need adequate roadway, water, storm drainage, park corridors and trails serving the SCSP area.
There is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the public facilities to be financed by the SCSP on-site roadway, off-site roadway, potable water, storm drainage, wetland mitigation for backbone infrastructure, park corridors and trails, wetland preserve buffer, and plan area formation fees attributable to the development on which the fees are imposed, because the cost of the facilities or portion of the facilities benefiting future development are allocated proportionately based on Dwelling Unit Equivalents that in turn, are calculated based on the benefit received by the various land use categories that will develop in the SCSP area. The fair- share cost allocation calculated for the roadway, water, storm drainage, park corridors and trails, wetland mitigation and wetlands buffer facilities for each land use is the proportional fee amount for each land use.
1. This project is statutorily exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Pub. Res. Code Section 21080(b)(8)(D) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15273(a)(4) because it involves the establishment of a public agency fee
ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2026 Page 3 of 3
for the purpose of obtaining funds for capital projects necessary to maintain services that are already planned for the SunCreek Specific Plan, which is within the City’s existing service area. The nature of the facilities planned as part of the Capital Improvement Plan were addressed by the SunCreek Environmental Impact Report certified by the City Council on November 18, 2013. Additional environmental review will be required for those projects subject to CEQA when site-specific plans are prepared.
Section 2. Action
The City of Rancho Cordova, by a majority vote of its City Council, does hereby approve and adopt the following:
1. The SunCreek Specific Plan Development Impact Fee Nexus Study (“SCSP Nexus Study”) dated May 2026, attached as Exhibit A.
2. The on-site roadway, off-site roadway, potable water, storm drainage, wetland mitigation for backbone infrastructure, trails, wetland preserve buffer, plan formation, and administration fees as shown in the SCSP Nexus Study and attached as Exhibit B. These fees shall go into effect on ____________, 2026, as authorized by Gov. Code Section 66017(a) and are applicable to the SCSP Area attached as Exhibit C.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 3 rd day of August 2026 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
____________________________
Garrett Gatewood, Mayor
ATTEST:
Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT
FEE NEXUS STUDY
DRAFT REPORT
Prepared for: Prepared by:
City of Rancho Cordova Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
May 2026
EPS #252057
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table of Contents
1. Introduction and Summary of Findings 1
Plan Area Fee Program Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 2 Fees Components with Residential Fees by Unit Type ................................................................................................ 6 Fee Components with Residential Fees Calculated Proportionately to Dwelling Unit Size ........................ 7 Plan Area Fee Comparison ....................................................................................................................................................... 7 SCSP Fee Program Update Implementation and Administration ......................................................................... 11 Nexus Study Definitions ......................................................................................................................................................... 13 Supporting Documents ........................................................................................................................................................... 13 Organization of Report ........................................................................................................................................................... 14
2. SCSP Land Uses and Demographics 15
Buildout Land Uses ................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Demographic Information ..................................................................................................................................................... 19
3. Planned Public Improvements and Costs 22
Roadways ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 23 Water .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 24 Storm Drainage .......................................................................................................................................................................... 25 Wetland Mitigation for Backbone Infrastructure ....................................................................................................... 25 Trails ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 26 Wetland Preserve Buffer ....................................................................................................................................................... 26 SCSP Plan Area Formation .................................................................................................................................................... 27
4. Public Improvements Cost Allocation and Fee Estimate 28 Cost Allocation by Component ............................................................................................................................................ 34
5. Nexus Findings 37
Authority ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 37 California Government Code Section 66001 ................................................................................................................ 37 California Government Code Section 66016.5 (AB 602) ......................................................................................... 45
6. Fee Program Implementation and Administration 52
Fee Program Updates .............................................................................................................................................................. 52 Reviews and Accounting ........................................................................................................................................................ 53 Accessory Dwelling Units ...................................................................................................................................................... 54 Fee Program Credits and Reimbursements ................................................................................................................... 55 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Appendices
Appendix A: SCSP Fee Program Capital Improvement Plan
Appendix B: Trails and Roadwa ys Cost Allocation Methodology Appendix C: Detailed Cost Allocations
Appendix D: Preliminary Cost Estimate for SCSP Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure (prepared by MacKay & Somps)
Appendix E: Plan Area Formation Costs and Funding (prepared by SunCreek Owners’ Group) ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
List of Tables
Table 1. Plan Area Fees per Residential Unit, Nonresidential Square Foot, and Net Acre (2026$) .......................................................................................................................... 4 Table 2. Plan Area Fees per Resident ial Land Use and Square Foot Range and Nonresidential Square Foot (2026$) ................................................................................... 5 Table 3. Plan Area Fee Comparison ............................................................................................. ................... 8 Table 4. Land Use Summary ..................................................................................................... ......................... 17 Table 5. Land Use Summary by Owner ............................................................................................ ............ 18 Table 6. Residential Units and Population Summary ............................................................................. 20 Table 7. PPH and VM T Factors Summary ................................................................................................... 21 Table 8. Public Improvements and Admi nistration Cost Summary (2026$) ............................... 23 Table 9. Cost Allocation Summary at Buildout – All Improvements Except Roadways and Trails (2026$) ......................................................................................................... 29 Table 10. Cost Allocation Summary – Roadways and Trails .................................................................. 30 Table 11. Summary of Total DUEs ............................................................................................... ..................... 32 Table 12. Summary of Roadways and Trails DUEs .................................................................................... 33 List of Maps
Map 1. SunCreek Specific Plan Regional Location .................................................................................. 1 Map 2. SCSP Land Use Map ...................................................................................................... ...................... 16 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 1 Introduction and Summary of Findings
1. Introduction and Summary of Findings
The SunCreek Specific Plan area (SCSP or Plan Area) is located on approximately 1,264 acres in the south area of the City of Rancho Cordova (City). Map 1 below shows the location of the SCSP in the City and greater region.
Map 1. SunCreek Specific Plan Regional Location
The SunCreek Specific Plan documen
t, which details the formation and
development of the SCSP, was approved by the City in 2013 and later amended in 2018, 2021, and 2022. The SCSP is planned to be a mixed-use development with the different parts of the Plan Area interconnected by an extensive pedestrian and bicycle trail system. The SCSP contains a major open space corridor that runs throughout the plan area and serves as the backbone for the trail system that links the different neighborhoods in the SCSP.
The SunCreek Public Facilities Financing Plan (Financing Plan) was adopted by the City in 2013. The Financing Plan included the formation of a special financing district (SFD) to implement financing mechanisms to fund required backbone ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 2 Introduction and Summary of Findings infrastructure and public facilities in the SCSP. The major financing mechanisms include the SCSP Development Impact Fee Program, a potential community facilities district (CFD) to provide land-secured financing through the issuance of bonds, private developer financing, and funding through established City and regional development impact fee programs.
Plan Area Fee Program Overview
The subject of this SCSP Fee Program Nexus Study Update (Nexus Study Update) is the SCSP Development Impact Fee Program (Fee Program). The SCSP Development Impact Fee Nexus Study (2022 Nexus Study) that established the Fee Program was adopted by the City in 2022. The purpose of the Nexus Study Update is to update the Fee Program and the legally required nexus findings for the City to update the development impact fees (fees). This Nexus Study also summarizes key components of the implementation and administration of the proposed Fee Program update. As described herein, the Fee Program will be updated periodically to reflect changes in land uses, facilities requirements, improvement costs, and other fee program information over time.
The Fee Program is a City-implemented plan area-specific development impact fee program applicable only to SCSP land uses. It is used as a mechanism to fund backbone infrastructure and public facilities needed to serve the projected new residents and employees that are not funded by other sources. The Fee Program contains the following fee components:
• Roadway
• Potable Water
• Storm Drainage
• Wetland Mitigation for Backbone Infrastructure
• Trails
• Wetland Preserve Buffer
• Plan Area Formation
• Administration
Table 1 and Table 2 summarize the proposed fees by residential and commercial land use for each of the fee components. The two commercial land uses (Village Center and Regional Town Center) are each composed of a mix of office and retail development, so both retail and office fees are shown for these land uses. If commercial development occurs that cannot be categorized as retail or office, then the City Community Development Director will determine the fees. Fees for all components except the Plan Area Formation component will be charged and collected per residential dwelling unit or commercial building square foot. The fees for the Plan Area Formation component will be charged and collected per net acre for both residential and commercial land uses.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 3 Introduction and Summary of Findings The proposed fees are based on the best land use information, backbone infrastructure and public facilities costs estimates, funding source information, and administrative cost estimates available at this time. The cost estimates presented in this report are in constant 2026 dollars. The following chapters of this report detail the land uses, facilities requirements, cost estimates, and cost allocation methodology used to estimate the fees.
The fees by component are summarized in two tables because some of the components have different residential fee categories than others (although the commercial fee categories are the same for all Fee Program components). Table 1 includes fees for all components for which the residential fees vary by unit type only, and Table 2 includes fees for all components for which the residential fees vary by unit type and square footage categories of the dwelling units.
The different residential fee categories for different Fee Program components are necessitated to address provisions of California Assembly Bill 602 (AB 602), enacted in 2021. AB 602 modified the Mitigation Fee Act and stipulates that a jurisdiction must calculate residential fees proportionately to the square footage of the dwelling units, with the exception of water and sewer fees and any other fees for which specific findings can be made as to why the fees should not be enacted on a square foot basis.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 4 Introduction and Summary of Findings Table 1. Plan Area Fees per Residential Unit, Nonresidential Square Foot, and Net Acre (2026$) Item
Low
Density
Medium
Density
Compact
Density
High
Density Retail Office Retail Office
FEES DUE AT BUILDING PERMIT
Plan Area Improvements
Potable Water $1,482 $1,482 $1,112 $1,112 $0.57 $0.57 $0.57 $0.57 Storm Drainage $903 $902 $714 $360 $1.01 $1.01 $1.01 $1.01 Wetland Mitigation for Backbone Infrastructure $2,276 $1,817 $1,027 $519 $1.13 $1.13 $1.13 $1.13 Wetland Preserve Buffer $558 $446 $252 $127 $0.28 $0.28 $0.28 $0.28 Total Plan Area Improvements $5,219 $4,647 $3,105 $2,118 $2.99 $2.99 $2.99 $2.99 Administration (3%) $157 $139 $93 $64 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 Total $5,376 $4,786 $3,198 $2,182 $3.08 $3.08 $3.08 $3.08 Maximum Fee Credits/Reimbursements $5,219 $4,647 $3,105 $2,118 $2.99 $2.99 $2.99 $2.99 (Admin. portion ineligible for credits/reimb.)
FEES DUE AT FINAL MAP [2]
Plan Area Formation $2,883 $2,883 $2,883 $2,883 $2,883 $2,883 $2,883 $2,883 Administration (3%) $86 $86 $86 $86 $86 $86 $86 $86
Total $2,969 $2,969 $2,969 $2,969 $2,969 $2,969 $2,969 $2,969 Maximum Credits/Reimbursements $2,883 $2,883 $2,883 $2,883 $2,883 $2,883 $2,883 $2,883 (Admin. portion ineligible for credits/reimb.)
Source: City of Rancho Cordova; MacKay & Somps; EPS.
[1] Fees for commercial development that is not categorized as retail or office will be determined by the community development director. [2] The Plan Area Formation fees will be paid at building permit for development for which a final small lot map is not required. per net acre
Residential Village Center [1]
SunCreek Plan Area Fee
per unit
Regional
Town Center [1]
per bldg. sq. ft.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 5 Introduction and Summary of Findings Table 2. Plan Area Fees per Residential Land Use and Squa re Foot Range and Nonresidential Square Foot (2026$) Item Onsite Offsite Total Subtotal Admin. Total Total
(3%)
Residential Land Uses
Single Family
Very Small <=800 $1,658 $360 $2,018 $725 $2,743 $82 $2,825 $1,658 $725 $2,383 Small 801-1200 $1,872 $407 $2,279 $870 $3,149 $94 $3,243 $1,872 $870 $2,742 Medium Small 1,201-1,600 $1,936 $421 $2,357 $912 $3,269 $98 $3,367 $1,936 $912 $2,848 Medium 1,601-2,400 $2,058 $447 $2,505 $992 $3,497 $105 $3,602 $2,058 $992 $3,050 Large >2,400 $2,193 $476 $2,669 $1,087 $3,756 $113 $3,869 $2,193 $1,087 $3,280 Multifamily
Very Small <=800 $1,302 $283 $1,585 $411 $1,996 $60 $2,056 $1,302 $411 $1,713 Small 801-1200 $1,471 $319 $1,790 $529 $2,319 $70 $2,389 $1,471 $529 $2,000 Medium Small 1,201-1,600 $1,552 $337 $1,889 $583 $2,472 $74 $2,546 $1,552 $583 $2,135 Medium 1,601-2,400 $1,552 $337 $1,889 $583 $2,472 $74 $2,546 $1,552 $583 $2,135 Large >2,400 $1,552 $337 $1,889 $583 $2,472 $74 $2,546 $1,552 $583 $2,135 Age-Restricted Single Family
Very Small <=800 $772 $168 $940 $468 $1,408 $42 $1,450 $772 $468 $1,240 Small 801-1200 $872 $189 $1,061 $561 $1,622 $49 $1,671 $872 $561 $1,433 Medium Small 1,201-1,600 $902 $196 $1,098 $589 $1,687 $51 $1,738 $902 $589 $1,491 Medium 1,601-2,400 $958 $208 $1,166 $640 $1,806 $54 $1,860 $958 $640 $1,598 Large >2,400 $1,021 $222 $1,243 $701 $1,944 $58 $2,002 $1,021 $701 $1,722 Age-Restricted Multifamily
Very Small <=800 $638 $139 $777 $356 $1,133 $34 $1,167 $638 $356 $994 Small 801-1200 $720 $156 $876 $427 $1,303 $39 $1,342 $720 $427 $1,147 Medium Small 1,201-1,600 $760 $165 $925 $470 $1,395 $42 $1,437 $760 $470 $1,230 Medium 1,601-2,400 $760 $165 $925 $470 $1,395 $42 $1,437 $760 $470 $1,230 Large >2,400 $760 $165 $925 $470 $1,395 $42 $1,437 $760 $470 $1,230 Commercial Land Uses [1]
Village Center
Retail $1.86 $0.40 $2.26 $0.00 $2.26 $0.07 $2.33 $1.86 $0.00 $1.86 Office $2.22 $0.48 $2.70 $0.00 $2.70 $0.08 $2.78 $2.22 $0.00 $2.22 Regional Town Center
Retail $1.86 $0.40 $2.26 $0.00 $2.26 $0.07 $2.33 $1.86 $0.00 $1.86 Office $2.22 $0.48 $2.70 $0.00 $2.70 $0.08 $2.78 $2.22 $0.00 $2.22 Source: City of Rancho Cordova; MacKay & Somps; EPS.
[1] Fees for commercial development that is not categorized as retail or office will be determined by the community development director.
Trails
SunCreek Plan Area Fee - Roadways and Trails
Maximum Fee Credits/
Reimbursements
per bldg. sq. ft.
per unit
Onsite
Roadways Trails
Roadways
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution