SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 6 Introduction and Summary of Findings Fees Components with Residential Fees by Unit Type
Table 1 shows the fees for the components for which residential fees are calculated by unit type only and do not take unit square footage into consideration. The following fee components are included on Table 1:
• Potable Water
• Storm Drainage
• Wetland Mitigation for Backbone Infrastructure
• Wetland Preserve Buffer
• Administration 1
The residential and nonresidential fee categories for these fee components are shown below:
Residential Categories
• Low Density
• Medium Density
• Compact Density
• High Density
Nonresidential Categories
• Retail
• Office
Potable water fees are specifically exempted from the AB 602 requirement that residential fees be calculated proportionately to the square footage of dwelling units, while findings are made later in this report for the other fee components as to why the fees should not be calculated proportionately to the unit square footage.
Plan Area Formation Fee Component
Table 1 also shows the proposed Plan Area Formation fees. The land use categories for this fee component are the same as the above, but the Plan Area Formation fee will be charged and collected per net acre for both residential and commercial land uses, with the fee per acre the same for each land use. The Plan Area Formation fee revenue will be used to reimburse landowners who have paid greater than their fair share obligation of Plan Area Formation costs based on the number of developable acres that they own. The estimated Plan Area Formation reimbursements by landowner are detailed in Chapter 4.
1 For each land use, the administration fee is calculated as three percent of the sum of all other fee components listed.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 7 Introduction and Summary of Findings Fee Components with Residential Fees Calculated
Proportionately to Dwelling Unit Size
Table 2 shows the fees for the components listed below for which residential fees are calculated by unit type and unit square footage.
• Roadways
• Trails
• Administration2
In response to the provisions of AB 602, the above Fee Program components must have fees that differ by dwelling unit size. It is proposed that the Fee Program be updated to include 20 different residential fee land use categories for these fee components. As shown on Table 2 and listed below, these categories are comprised of four major unit types, each with the same five different unit size categories Unit Types
• Single-family
• Multifamily
• Age-Restricted Single-family
• Age-Restricted Multifamily
Unit Size Categories for Each Unit Type
• Very Small: less than or equal to 800 sq. ft.
• Small: 801 to 1,200 sq. ft.
• Medium Small: 1,201 to 1,600 sq. ft.
• Medium: 1.601 to 2,400 sq. ft.
• Large: greater than 2,400 sq. ft.
The proposed fees are based on the best land use information, backbone infrastructure and public facilities costs estimates, funding source information, and administrative cost estimates available at this time. The cost estimates presented in this report are in constant 2026 dollars. The following chapters of this report detail the land uses, facilities requirements, cost estimates, and cost allocation methodology used to estimate the fees.
Plan Area Fee Comparison
Table 3 provides a comparison of the proposed SCSP fees and the current SCSP fees in effect as of January 1, 2026.
2 For each land use, the administration fee is calculated as three percent of the sum of all other fee components listed.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 8 Introduction and Summary of Findings Table 3. Plan Area Fee Comparison
Item
Single Family
(Low Density)
High
Density Retail Office
PROPOSED FEES
Plan Area Improvements
Potable Water $1,482 $1,112 $0.57 $0.57
Storm Drainage $903 $360 $1.01 $1.01
Wetland Mitigation for Backbone Infrastructure $2,276 $519 $1.13 $1.13 Wetland Preserve Buffer $558 $127 $0.28 $0.28
Onsite Roadways [1] $2,058 $1,471 $1.86 $2.22
Offsite Roadways [1] $447 $319 $0.40 $0.48
Trails [1] $992 $529 $0.00 $0.00
Total Plan Area Improvements $8,716 $4,437 $5.25 $5.69
CURRENT FEES (as of Jan. 1, 2026)
Plan Area Improvements
Potable Water $1,487 $1,114 $0.57 $0.57
Storm Drainage $909 $362 $1.01 $1.01
Wetland Mitigation for Backbone Infrastructure $2,305 $525 $1.14 $1.14 Wetland Preserve Buffer $558 $128 $0.28 $0.28
Onsite Roadways $2,049 $1,599 $2.21 $1.94
Offsite Roadways $446 $348 $0.48 $0.42
Trails $1,051 $548 $0.00 $0.00
Total Plan Area Improvements $8,804 $4,625 $5.69 $5.36
DIFFERENCE (Proposed Fees - Current Fees)
Plan Area Improvements
Potable Water ($5) ($2) $0.00 $0.00
Storm Drainage ($6) ($2) $0.00 $0.00
Wetland Mitigation for Backbone Infrastructure ($29) ($6) ($0.01) ($0.01) Wetland Preserve Buffer ($0) ($1) $0.00 $0.00
Onsite Roadways $9 ($128) ($0.35) $0.28
Offsite Roadways $1 ($29) ($0.08) $0.06
Trails ($59) ($19) $0.00 $0.00
Total Plan Area Improvements ($88) ($188) ($0.44) $0.33 Pct. Difference (1.0%) (4.1%) (7.7%) 6.2%
Source: City of Rancho Cordova; MacKay & Somps; EPS.
[1] For comparison purposes, the following residential land uses are assumed:
Low Density Single Family Medium 1,601-2,400
High Density Multifamily Small 801-1200
SunCreek Plan Area Fee
Residential Nonresidential
per unit per bldg. sq. ft.
per unit per bldg. sq. ft.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 9 Introduction and Summary of Findings There is very little change in the fees, with the fees for most components declining modestly. The only fees that increase are the single-family and office roadway fees.
Fee Decreases
The cost estimates and fees have been increased annually by the same inflation factor, but some improvements have been completed. The costs of these completed improvements are included in the buildout costs but are no longer escalated. This situation leads to a decrease in the fee components for which improvements have been completed.
Fee Increases
The increase in the roadway fees for some land uses (and the general shift in roadway fees among land uses) is explained by the new roadway residential land use categories by square foot ranges. Table 3 compares a Low Density unit under the current fee structure with a Single-family Medium unit under the new fee structure and a High Density unit under the current fee structure with a Multifamily Small unit under the new fee structure. Because the new land uses for roadways (and trails) do not align exactly with the current land uses, the cost allocation shifts the burden among land uses, resulting in some fee increases even though the costs and fees have escalated at the same rates.
Nexus Study Requirements
California Government Code 66000
The purpose of a nexus study is to establish the legally required nexus (or reasonable relationship) between projected new residential and nonresidential development and the capital facilities that will be required to serve that new development. The nexus requirements for imposing development impact fees were established under AB 1600 legislation, as codified by the Mitigation Fee Act (the Act; California Government Code section 66000 and following). The Act sets forth the procedural requirements for establishing and collecting development impact fees. The procedures require that a “reasonable relationship or nexus must exist between a governmental exaction and the purpose of the condition.” Specifically, each local agency imposing a fee must:
• Identify the purpose of the fee.
• Identify how the fee is to be used.
• Determine how a reasonable relationship exists between the fee’s use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. • Determine how a reasonable relationship exists between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 10 Introduction and Summary of Findings • Determine how a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility is attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed.
Assembly Bill 602
In 2021, AB 602 amended the requirements that would apply to new or updated impact fees by creating a “standards and practices” section to the Act, codified as Government Code Section 66016.5. This section is both declaratory of previously existing law and adds certain new requirements. A new provision that pertains to this report requires that a nexus study “shall calculate a fee imposed on a housing development project proportionately to the square footage of proposed units of the development” [66016.5(a)(5)(A)], and “large jurisdictions shall adopt a capital improvement plan as a part of the nexus study” [66016.5(a)(6)].
Water and sewer systems are specifically exempt from the requirements of Section 66016.5. An exemption to the square footage allocation method may be made for other backbone infrastructure if the nexus study makes the following three findings:
• An explanation as to why square footage is not an appropriate metric to calculate fees imposed on a housing development project. • An explanation that an alternative basis of calculating the fee bears a reasonable relationship between the fee charged and the burden posed by the development.
• That other policies in the fee structure support smaller developments or otherwise ensure that smaller developments are not charged disproportionate fees.
Section 66016.5 [66016.5(a)(5)(C)] also states that the square footage allocation method “does not prohibit an agency from establishing different fees for different types of developments.”
In response to these provisions of AB 602, this Nexus Study Update makes findings justifying the use of the residential fee land uses summarized previously for the various fee components. Chapter 5 details all required nexus findings.
Senate Bill 13 and Accessory Dwelling Units
In addition to the considerations discussed above pursuant to AB 602, a separate piece of legislation, California Senate Bill 13 (SB 13), passed in 2019, established a new system for assessing fees on accessory dwelling units (ADUs). It amended California Government Code Section 65852.2(3)(A)(f)(3) to read:
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 11 Introduction and Summary of Findings “A local agency, special district, or water corporation shall not impose any impact fee upon the development of an accessory dwelling unit less than 750 square feet.
Any impact fees charged for an accessory dwelling unit of 750 square feet or more shall be charged proportionately in relation to the square footage of the primary dwelling unit.”
Based on this section of the California Government Code, any ADU smaller than 750 square feet is exempt from the Fee Program. Fees on ADUs larger than 750 square feet require the City to perform the following calculations:
1. Determine the total habitable building square footage of both the proposed ADU and the primary residential unit on the lot on which the ADU is proposed.
As an example, assume that a primary low-density single-family dwelling unit has 2,000 habitable building square feet and the proposed ADU has 1,000 habitable building square feet.
2. Calculate the ADU’s habitable building square feet as a percentage of the primary unit’s habitable building square feet.
In the example from step 1), the size of the ADU is 50 percent of the primary residential unit.
3. Identify the fee category and fee that would have applied to the primary residential unit. In the SCSP Fee Program, the fee category would differ for the different fee components.
In the example from step 1), the Fee Program category is “Medium Single-Family 1,601 to2,400 sq. ft.” for Roadways and Trails fees and Low Density Residential for the other fee components.
4. For each fee component, calculate the ADU fees as the percentage from step 2) multiplied by the fee for the fee category identified in step 3). In the example from step 1), the ADU fee for each fee component is 50 percent of the primary unit fee.
SCSP Fee Program Update Implementation and
Administration
Implementation
Chapter 6 details the process and requirements for adopting the updated SCSP Fee Program fees. The fees must be adopted by the City Council and will be effective 60 days following final action on the adoption of this Nexus Study Update.
The SCSP Fee Program is independent and separate from all other City, County, other agency, or regional development impact fees that will be applicable to development in the City.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 12 Introduction and Summary of Findings Adoption of this Nexus Study Update requires the City Council to follow certain procedures, including holding a public hearing with at least 30 days’ notice for the hearing. The City is required to post a public notice at least 30 days before the public hearing considering the Nexus Study Update. The City shall notify any member of the public who requests notice of intent to begin an impact fee nexus study of the date of the hearing. Mailed notice 14 days before the public hearing is required for those individuals who request such notification. Data, such as this Nexus Study Update and referenced material, must be made available at least 10 days before the public hearing.
Administration
The City will administer the Fee Program. The Fee Program will include a three percent fee administration component to fund Fee Program administration.
Administration of the Fee Program will include the following major tasks:
• Tracking all Fee Program payments and assignment of fee credits and reimbursements for improvements constructed privately by developers. • Tracking the progress of construction contracts for Fee Program improvements.
• Reviewing proposed fee credit and reimbursement agreements for City Council consideration.
• Performing annual fee adjustments to account for the inflation of public facilities costs.
• Conducting periodic reviews of development projections, facilities requirements, improvement costs, funding sources, and cost allocation methodologies, and making necessary adjustments to the Fee Program through subsequent fee program adjustments.
• Preparing the required annual and five-year reports on the status of the Fee Program.
Chapter 6 of this report details the Fee Program update implementation and administration. Using its authority to implement and update the Fee Program, the City reserves the right to make interpretations, clarifications, or other modifications to the Fee Program update implementation and administration provisions summarized in this Nexus Study, subject to the provisions of the Development Agreements.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 13 Introduction and Summary of Findings Nexus Study Definitions
The Nexus Study Update will use the following definitions to describe more precisely infrastructure improvements and facilities included in the SCSP Fee Program:
• Backbone Infrastructure: This term includes most of the public service-based items that are underground or at ground level and may be either on-site or off- site (i.e., within or outside the SCSP boundaries). Backbone Infrastructure is sized to serve the SCSP as a whole and in some cases may be sized to serve broader development areas, including existing development (e.g., future freeway interchanges). The following categories of backbone infrastructure are included in the Fee Program:
- Roadways
- Potable Water
- Storm Drainage
- Wetland Mitigation for Backbone Infrastructure
• Public Facilities: This group of items includes public amenities and facilities to “house” employees providing services to the area (e.g., law enforcement and fire).
The following categories of public facilities are included in the Fee Program:
- Trails
- Wetland Preserve Buffers
Note: The SCSP includes additional public facilities, such as schools, fire facilities, library facilities, and park facilities that are not included in the Fee Program. • Public Improvements (or Improvements): This term is used generally in the Nexus Study to refer to Backbone Infrastructure and Public Facilities when a precise breakdown is not required.
Supporting Documents
The following documents produced by or for the City have been used to inform this Nexus Study Update:
• 2022 SunCreek Specific Plan Development Impact Fee Nexus Study • SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan
• Development Agreements between the City and SCSP Property Owners • SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan Public Facilities Financing Plan • Infrastructure cost estimates prepared by MacKay & Somps (included as Appendix C of this report)
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 14 Introduction and Summary of Findings Organization of Report
This Nexus Study Update is organized into the following chapters:
• Chapter 1 summarizes the proposed Fee Program.
• Chapter 2 identifies the land uses that will be subject to the Fee Program. • Chapter 3 details the Fee Program improvements and costs. • Chapter 4 details the cost allocation and fee estimate methodology. • Chapter 5 summarizes the nexus findings for each Fee Program component. • Chapter 6 describes Fee Program implementation and administration.
In addition, the Nexus Study contains the following appendices:
• Appendix A: SCSP Fee Program Capital Improvement Program • Appendix B: Trails and Roadways Cost Allocation Methodology • Appendix C: Cost Allocations
• Appendix D: Preliminary Cost Estimate for SCSP Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure (prepared by MacKay & Somps).
• Appendix E: Plan Area Formation Costs and Funding (prepared by SunCreek Owners’ Group).
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 15 SCSP Land Uses and Demographics
2. SCSP Land Uses and Demographics
Development impact fees are charged on new development to help fund infrastructure and public facilities that are needed to serve the new development. The fees imposed must be based on proportionality to the demand generated, or benefit received, by each land use category on which the fee is imposed. This chapter details the projected development by land use category in the SCSP through buildout.
The SCSP is located on approximately 1,264 acres in the Sunrise Douglas Community Plan (SDCP), adopted by the County in 1995. This area is now part of the City (which incorporated in July 2003) and has been identified for development in the City’s General Plan. Although the SDCP is no longer in effect, the SCSP provides important uses, including a high school, middle school, community park, and additional commercial uses that complement the previously approved SunRidge Specific Plan and help complete the Sunrise Douglas community. Map 2 illustrates the planned land uses for the SCSP.
Buildout Land Uses
Table 4 details the projected residential, nonresidential (commercial), and public land uses at buildout of the SCSP. Table 5 further details the residential dwelling units and nonresidential acres by land use category for each of the six SCSP land owners.
The low and medium density dwelling units for the Grantline 220 owner have developed, but because the SCSP fees in this report are based on an allocation of buildout costs to buildout land uses, the projected development at buildout is shown.
The projected residential units and commercial building square feet incorporate land use contingencies under the assumption that less than 100 percent of the allowable development will occur. The projected single-family dwelling units reflect an expected development rate of 98 percent of the maximum, while the projected multifamily units and commercial building square feet reflect an expected development rate of 95 percent of the maximum. In total, the following development is projected at buildout:
• 601.8 residential acres and 4,522 residential units
• 67.5 commercial acres and 698,000 building square feet of commercial development
• 111.2 acres of public schools
• 398.8 acres of parks, trails, detention basins, open space, and other public and quasi-public uses
• 84.7 acres of major roadways
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 16 SCSP Land Uses and Demographics Map 2. SCSP Land Use Map
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 17 SCSP Land Uses and Demographics Table 4. Land Use Summary
Land Use
FAR
[1] Acres
Dwelling
Units
Building
Square
Feet
Revised
Dwelling Units
(rounded)
Revised
Bldg. Sq. Ft.
(rounded)
Formula A B C D E=A*B*43,560 A*D A*E
Residential Land Uses
Low Density 98% 163.0 857 840
Medium Density 98% 367.1 2,417 2,369
Compact Density 98% 27.5 320 314
High Density 95% 44.2 1,052 999
Total Residential 601.8 4,646 0 4,522
Commercial Land Uses
Village Center 95% 0.25 21.9 238,491 226,566
Regional Town Center 95% 0.25 45.6 496,584 471,755
Total Nonresidential 67.5 735,075 698,321
Total Residential and Commercial 669.3 4,646 735,075 4,522 698,321 Public and Other Land Uses
Elementary School 31.9
Middle School/High School 79.3
Community Parks 45.1
Public Neighborhood Parks 20.9
Pocket Parks 12.2
Park Corridors 6.1
Detention Basin 52.0
Public/Quasi-Public 8.1
Wetland Preserve 199.6
Wetland Preserve Buffer 48.6
Storm Water Canal 6.2
Grant Line Road 3.1
Major Roads 81.6
Total Public and Other 594.7
Total All Land Uses 1,264.0 4,646 735,075 4,522 698,321 Source: City of Rancho Cordova; SunCreek Owners Group; EPS. [1] FAR assumption by EPS.
Land Use
Contingency
Buildout
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 18 SCSP Land Uses and Demographics Table 5. Land Use Summary by Owner
Land Use Callahan Investek Shalako
Grantline
220
Smith
Dunmore
Sierra
Sunrise Total
Residential Dwelling Units
Low Density Traditional 0 149 344 167 0 197 857
Medium Density Traditional 318 592 587 406 0 514 2,417
Compact Density 0 153 0 0 0 167 320
High Density 235 140 237 272 0 168 1,052
Total Residential 553 1,034 1,168 845 0 1,046 4,646
Acres
Residential
Low Density Traditional 0.0 20.1 66.9 36.7 0.0 39.3 163.0 Medium Density Traditional 44.9 77.8 88.0 76.8 0.0 79.6 367.1 Compact Density 0.0 13.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.5 27.5
High Density 11.8 5.4 9.1 12.9 0.0 5.0 44.2
Total Residential 56.7 116 .3 164.0 126.4 0.0 138.4 601.8 Commercial
Village Center 0.0 5.7 16.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.9
Regional Town Center 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.6 0.0 0.0 45.6
Total Commercial 0.0 5.7 16.2 45.6 0.0 0.0 67.5
Public and Other
School 34.4 11.1 10.8 10.0 44.9 0.0 111.2
Community Parks 10.5 15.7 0.0 0.0 18.0 0.9 45.1
Public Neighborhood Parks 0.0 0.0 8.2 8.1 0.0 4.6 20.9
Pocket Parks 2.0 1.7 2.7 2.1 0.0 3.7 12.2
Park Corridors (parkways, paseos, and trail 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.0 2.3 6.1 Detention Basin 4.5 8.0 9.5 8.2 3.4 18.4 52.0
Public/Quasi-Public 2.5 4.7 0.4 0.0 0.5 0.0 8.1
Wetland Preserve 24.5 39.0 77.3 0.0 10.4 48.4 199.6
Wetland Preserve Buffer 5.3 19.3 14.7 0.0 1.2 8.1 48.6
Storm Water Canal 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.2 0.0 0.0 6.2
Grant Line Road 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.0 3.1
Major Roads 20.0 18.6 13.8 9.3 1.7 18.2 81.6
Total Public and Other 103. 7 118.1 141.2 47.0 80.1 104.6 594.7 Total Acres 160.4 240.1 321. 4 219.0 80.1 243.0 1,264.0 Source: City of Rancho Cordova; SunCreek Owners Group.
Buildout by Landowner
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 19 SCSP Land Uses and Demographics Residential Development
The residential land use categories range from low density single-family dwelling units with a density of approximately 5 units per acre to high density multifamily dwelling units with a density of approximately 23 units per acre. The densities reflect the approximate densities achieved after applying the land use contingency factor discussed in the previous section. Low density units will be single-family detached housing. Medium density units include single-family houses, duplexes and half-plexes, court housing, garden apartments, townhouses, and condominiums. The most typical housing types will be small lot single-family detached, single-family attached, and small apartment complexes. The compact density residential units may include detached cottages or cluster housing but more typically will include common walls for all or a significant portion of the units in the Plan Area. High- density residential units include apartments and condominiums.
Nonresidential Development
The nonresidential land use categories in the SCSP include Village Center and Regional Town Center uses. The projected building square feet for each of these land use categories are calculated assuming a land use contingency of 95 percent of maximum development and a floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.25 applied to the total acreage. The Village Center category provides retail services, restaurants, entertainment venues, and office sites. The Regional Town Center category provides regional shopping, entertainment, employment, and other large regional destination uses.
Demographic Information
Population Summary
Table 6 summarizes the estimated population at buildout of the SCSP. For each land use, the population is estimated as the number of dwelling units multiplied by the estimated persons per household (PPH). It is estimated that the SCSP will have a population of approximately 11,600 at buildout. The PPH factors are from the Rancho Cordova Municipal Code Chapter 22.40 Park and Recreation Dedication and Fees.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 20 SCSP Land Uses and Demographics Table 6. Residential Units and Population Summary
Persons per Household and Vehicle Miles Traveled
PPH factors are used in the trails cost allocation, and vehicle miles traveled per unit and 1,000 commercial square feet factors (VMT factors) are used in the roadways cost allocation. As discussed in Chapter 1, in response to the provisions of AB 602, residential fee categories that differ by dwelling unit size are used for the roadways and trails components. These unit size categories apply to each of the four separate unit types: single-family, multifamily, age-restricted single-family, and age- restricted multifamily. Table 7 summarizes the PPH and VMT factors used to allocate costs and establish fees by land use category. Appendix B details the calculation of these factors and their use in allocating trails and roadways costs.
Land Use Acres
Revised
Dwelling Units PPH Population
Source Table 4 Table 4
Single Family
Low Density 163.0 840 2.95 2,478
Medium Density 367.1 2,369 2.95 6,989
Compact Density 27.5 314 2.03 637
Total Single Family 557.6 3,523 2.87 10,104
Multifamily
High Density 44.2 999 1.54 1,538
Total Residential 601.8 4,522 2.57 11,642
Source: City of Rancho Cordova; SunCreek Owners Group.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 21 SCSP Land Uses and Demographics Table 7. PPH and VMT Factors Summary
Item PPH
VMT per
Unit/1K Sq. Ft. PPH VMT per Unit
Single-Family Residential
Age-Restricted Percentage [2] 65% 47%
Formula A B A* 65% B* 47%
Very Small (≤800 sq. ft.) 2.04 38.02 1.31 17.70
Small (801-1,200 sq. ft.) 2.45 42.95 1.58 20.00
Medium-Small (1,201-1,600 sq. ft.) 2.57 44.42 1.66 20.68 Medium (1,601-2,400 sq. ft.) 2.79 47.21 1.80 21.98
Large (>2,400 sq. ft.) 3.06 50.30 1.97 23.42
Weighted Average 2.87 48.09 1.85 22.39
Multifamily Residential
Age-Restricted Percentage [2] 81% 49%
Formula A B A* 81% B* 49%
Very Small (≤800 sq. ft.) 1.15 29.87 1.00 14.63
Small (801-1,200 sq. ft.) 1.49 33.74 1.20 16.52
Medium-Small (1,201-1,600 sq. ft.) 1.64 35.61 1.32 17.44 Medium (1,601-2,400 sq. ft.) 1.64 35.61 1.32 17.44
Large (>2,400 sq. ft.) 1.64 35.61 1.32 17.44
Weighted Average 1.54 34.37 1.24 16.84
Commercial
Retail 42.56
Office 50.86
[1] See Table B-4.
[2] See Table B-1.
Unrestricted Units
and Commercial [1] Age-Restricted Units
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 22 Planned Public Improvements and Costs
3. Planned Public Improvements and Costs
This chapter identifies the SCSP backbone infrastructure and public facilities (Public Improvements) included in the Fee Program as informed by the Preliminary Cost Estimate for SCSP Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure (Cost Estimate) prepared by MacKay & Somps in 2021. The Cost Estimate is included as Appendix C of this Nexus Study and contains cost and funding detail (and infrastructure exhibits.
In addition, this chapter identifies the anticipated SCSP Plan Formation requirements and costs that are included in the Fee Program as a separate improvement category. The following types of Public Improvements are included in the Fee Program:
• Roadways (Onsite and Offsite)
• Water
• Storm Drainage
• Wetland Mitigation for Backbone Infrastructure
• Park Corridors and Trails
• Wetland Preserve Buffer
• Plan Area Fee Formation
Appendix A of this Nexus Study contains the Fee Program Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). It includes summary tables for each Public Improvement type that show the improvement costs, credits from other fee programs, and remaining net improvement costs to be included in the Fee Program.
The costs in Appendix A are shown in 2020 and 2022, and 2026 dollars. The 2020 costs are obtained from the MacKay & Somps Cost Estimate in Appendix C and were escalated to 2022 dollars in the 2022 Nexus Study. The costs in this Nexus Study Update are subsequently escalated to 2026 dollars. The escalation factors used to estimate the 2022 and 2026 costs are calculated as the percentage change in the average of the Engineering-News Record’s San Francisco and 20-City Construction Cost Indices (CCIs) from October 2019 to October 2021 and from October 2021 to October 2025, respectively. Table A-9 of Appendix A shows the calculation of the escalation factors.
An exception to the cost escalation is made for improvements that have been constructed since the original Cost Estimate was prepared. Because buildout costs are used to allocate costs and calculate the fees (as detailed in the next chapter), the costs of these constructed improvements are retained in the CIP but are no longer escalated after the year in which they were constructed.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 23 Planned Public Improvements and Costs Table 8 summarizes the fee-funded Public Improvement costs in 2026 dollars from Appendix A, as well as estimated SCSP Plan Area Formation costs expended (detailed in Appendix E). The costs associated with each public improvement type and the Plan Area Formation costs are discussed in the remainder of this chapter.
Note that all referenced cost estimates apply to the escalated 2026 costs.
Table 8. Public Improvements and Administration Cost Summary (2026$)
Roadways
Backbone roadway facilities are identified as those facilities comprising 4 or more travel lanes, certain 2-lane collector roads, Con-Span drainage crossings, and certain pedestrian boulevard facilities, including enhanced median improvements. The proposed SCSP roadway improvements include both on-site and off-site backbone roadway improvements. The Cost Estimate identifies the SCSP improvements, costs, credits, and funding sources. The funding sources include the SCSP Fee Program, the City Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF) Program, and private developer funding. Construction of roadway frontage improvements (e.g., outside traffic lane; curb; gutter; sidewalk; bike lane; required landscaping; joint utilities trench; street lighting; and associated water, sewer, and drainage utilities) will be privately funded by adjacent development, while the remaining improvements will be funded through the TDIF Program or the SCSP Fee Program.
Item Source
Plan Area Improvements
On-Site Roadways Table A-1 $10,202,400
Off-Site Roadways Table A-1 $2,217,900
Water Table A-4 $6,616,500
Storm Drainage Table A-5 $4,186,600
Wetland Mitigation for Backbone Infrastructure Table A-6 $7,849,000 Trails Table A-7 $4,141,200
Wetland Preserve Buffer Table A-8 $1,924,200
Total Plan Area Improvements $37,137,800
Plan Area Formation [1] $1,929,331
Total Plan Area Costs $39,067,131
Administration (3%) $1,172,000
Total $40,239,131
Source: City of Rancho Cordova; MacKay & Somps; EPS.
[1] Estimate from SunCreek Owners' Group. Reflects actual costs expended through 2021 and estimated cost for 2022. Amount not inflated each year.
Plan Area
Fee-Funded
Cost (rounded)
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 24 Planned Public Improvements and Costs On-Site Roadways
The total cost of all SCSP on-site roadway infrastructure is estimated at $122.6 million at buildout. After accounting for funding from the City’s TDIF Program and private developers, it is estimated that approximately $10.2 million of improvements will be included in the SCSP Fee Program. Detailed in Table A-1 and Table A-2, this SCSP Fee Program-funded amount includes the costs of eight traffic signals, two drainage crossings, and three enhanced medians not funded by other sources.
Off-Site Roadways
The total cost of the off-site roadway infrastructure is estimated at $12.8 million at buildout, as detailed in Table A-3. An estimated $10.6 million in identified improvements on Rancho Cordova Parkway, Kiefer Boulevard, and the intersection at Jackson Road and Grant Line Road will be funded by the City TDIF. The remaining $2.2 million to be included in the SCSP Fee Program is the amount in the reciprocal funding agreement with the County. The reciprocal funding agreement includes the cost of off-site improvements needed for the SCSP development that will be constructed by the County. The SCSP costs are determined based on the SCSP fair share obligation of the County road improvements from which the SCSP benefits. In particular, the reciprocal funding agreement includes the SCSP’s fair share of the cost of Jackson Highway improvements that the County will construct.
Total Fee Program Funding
The on-site and off-site roadways costs identified as being funded through the Fee Program total approximately $12.4 million.
Water
The Sacramento County Water Agency (SCWA) serves as the water purveyor for the SCSP. The SCSP is located in SCWA Zone 40. Development of the SCSP will create additional demand for potable water supply, transmission, and distribution.
The planned backbone water infrastructure to be funded by the SCSP includes local and regional transmission mains. SCSP developers who construct improvements will receive SCWA Zone 40 fee credits and reimbursements for the portion of improvement costs included in the SCWA fee program.
The total cost of the backbone water infrastructure to be funded by the SCSP is estimated at $16.8 million at buildout. After accounting for funding from the SCWA Zone 40 Fee Program, it is estimated that approximately $6.6 million of improvements will be included in the SCSP Fee Program. Detailed in Table A-4, this amount includes the costs of local and regional transmission mains not funded by SCWA Zone 40.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 25 Planned Public Improvements and Costs Storm Drainage
Development of the SCSP will result in increased storm water runoff generated by the addition of impervious surface area in developed areas of the Project. The entire SCSP area is located in the Kite Creek, Morrison Creek, and upper Laguna Creek watersheds. The SCSP storm drainage system is proposed to limit the peak storm water flow after SCSP development to avoid exceeding predevelopment flows.
Planned storm water management facilities in the SCSP will mitigate for increased storm runoff created by SCSP development. To provide adequate flood attenuation to predevelopment peak flow rates, this Project proposes multiple on-site, in-line hydromodification detention facilities and 100-year peak flow attenuation in the existing creeks located in the wetland preserve area.
3 Permanent wetland preserve
and on-site storm water detention facilities will provide the majority of the SCSP storm water storage capacity that replicates the natural (predevelopment) condition. In some cases, detention facilities may be incorporated into joint use park/detention facilities.
The SCSP drainage costs identified in the Cost Estimate and in the Appendix A summary tables include costs of improvements needed to serve all onsite drainage needs. Only the portion needed to provide drainage for the backbone roadway system will be funded publicly through the SCSP, with the remaining drainage improvements funded privately by developers. Thus, for each improvement, a specific percentage of the total costs is applied to calculate the costs to be publicly funded by the SCSP.
Detailed in Table A-5, a total of $25.1 million in SCSP drainage improvements is identified with $4.2 million to be funded through the SCSP Fee Program.
Note that Appendix A shows SCWA Zone 11A credits and reimbursements for the portion of storm drainage improvement costs included in the SCWA Zone 11A fee program at the time that the cost estimates were prepared. However, the City now has its own City Storm Drainage Impact Fee Program that replaces the SCWA Zone 11A Fee Program. Credits under the City program may vary from the SCWA Zone 11A credits shown in Appendix A. Actual credits will be determined through the City Storm Drainage Impact Fee Program.
Wetland Mitigation for Backbone Infrastructure
Installation of backbone infrastructure (e.g., roads, sewer, water, drainage) to serve the SCSP will result in disturbance of waters of the United States, including wetlands. In accordance with the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, and U.S. Army Corp of Engineers (collectively, Agencies), the wetland impacts generated by construction of backbone
3 The attenuation of the 100-year peak flow in the existing creek system was specifically analyzed in the SunCreek Master Drainage Study, prepared by Watermark Engineering, dated November 15, 2017.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 26 Planned Public Improvements and Costs infrastructure will require mitigation through the payment of South Sacramento County Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) Fees.
The HCP fees for the SCSP are based on the cost to acquire and maintain the habitat land needed to mitigate for the disturbance of wetlands caused by the construction of backbone infrastructure in the SCSP. Detailed in Table A-6, the costs are identified by the mitigation required for each segment of backbone infrastructure. The total cost is estimated at $7.8 million at buildout, all of which will be funded through the Fee Program.
Trails
The SCSP includes a comprehensive trail system designed to serve its residents.
The trail system creates bicycle and pedestrian connections between residential, commercial, employment, transit, and recreational destinations. The trail system includes a series of more than three miles of primary and secondary trails within the SCSP and connects to the citywide trail network at the boundaries of the SCSP.
It includes both at-grade and grade separated pedestrian and bike crossings of major roads.
The grade-separated crossings are included in the City’s TDIF Program, and developers who construct these improvements will receive fee credits and reimbursements from the TDIF Program. Two of the five at-grade crossings are included in the roadway costs and, therefore, excluded from the trails costs.
Detailed in Table A-7, a total of $24.5 million in SCSP trail improvements is identified, with $4.1 million to be funded through the SCSP Fee Program after accounting for funding of the grade separated crossings from the TDIF Program. 4 Wetland Preserve Buffer
The SCSP includes more than 205 acres of wetland preserve areas and roughly 45 acres of wetland buffer areas. The wetland preserve area will provide protection and conservation of federally threatened and endangered species, as well as avoiding and minimizing impacts to waters of the United States, including wetlands, in accordance with requirements of the Agencies.
Planned wetland buffer improvements include minimal buffer landscaping, consisting of hydroseeding and mulching, as well as construction of wetland preserve post and cable barriers.
4 TDIF credits on Table A-7 are for reference only. Actual credits will be determined through the City TDIF Program.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 27 Planned Public Improvements and Costs Detailed in Table A-8, the improvements total approximately $1.9 million, all of which will be funded through the Fee Program.
SCSP Plan Area Formation
Prior to, and in the time since approval of the SunCreek Specific Plan in 2013, the SunCreek Owners’ Group has worked with the City to prepare various studies and reports, as well as specific plan amendments. Some of the work that has been required to facilitate development of the SCSP includes preparation of environmental studies, preparation of Level 2 water, sewer, and drainage technical studies, and providing engineering, planning, and financial services. The property owners have incurred the costs of this work associated with the Plan Area formation and will be reimbursed through the SCSP Fee Program. The total costs incurred are detailed in Appendix D and are estimated at $1.9 million, all of which will be funded through the Fee Program.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 28 Public Improvements Cost Allocation and Fee Estimate
4. Public Improvements Cost Allocation and
Fee Estimate
For each improvement type, the SCSP Fees are estimated by allocating SCSP Fee- funded costs (detailed in the previous chapter) to the various land uses based on each land use’s relative demand for and benefit received from the improvement type. In addition, the City will charge a 3-percent administration fee to administer the SCSP Fee Program.
As discussed in Chapter 1, some Fee Program components have residential fee categories that are defined by unit type only, whereas others have residential fee categories that vary by unit type and and square footage categories of the units.
These different residential fee categories for different Fee Program components are necessitated to address provisions of California Assembly Bill 602 (AB 602), enacted in 2021. AB 602 modified the Mitigation Fee Act and stipulates that a jurisdiction must calculate residential fees proportionately to the square footage of the dwelling units, with the exception of water and sewer fees and any other fees for which specific findings can be made as to why the fees should not be enacted on a square foot basis.
Table 9 provides a cost allocation summary and fee estimate for the fee components for which the proposed residential fees vary by unit type only (potable water, storm drainage, wetland mitigation for backbone infrastructure, and wetland preserve buffer). Table 10 provides a cost allocation summary and fee estimate for the components for which the proposed residential fees vary by unit type and square footage category (roadways and trails). The cost allocation and fees for all fee components except the plan area formation component are expressed per residential unit or commercial building square foot, while the plan area formation cost allocation and fees are expressed per net acre. The two commercial categories each are composed of retail and office uses and, thus, contain retail and office cost allocation components.
Although the residential fee categories differ for different fee components, the cost allocation method is the same. The specific steps in allocating the costs and estimating the fees for each fee component are outlined below:
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 29 Public Improvements Cost Allocation and Fee Estimate Table 9. Cost Allocation Summary at Buildout – A ll Improvements Except Roadways and Trails (2026$)
Item Source
Total
Costs
Low
Density
Medium
Density
Compact
Density
High
Density Retail Office Retail Office
Plan Area Improvements
Potable Water Table C-1 $6,616,500 $1,482 $1,482 $1,112 $1,112 $0.57 $0.57 $0.57 $0.57 Storm Drainage Table C-2 $4,186,600 $903 $902 $714 $360 $1.01 $1.01 $1.01 $1.01 Wetland Mitigation for Backbone Infrastructure Table C-3 $7,849,000 $2,276 $1,817 $1,027 $519 $1.13 $1.13 $1.13 $1.13 Wetland Preserve Buffer Table C-4 $1,924,200 $558 $446 $252 $127 $0.28 $0.28 $0.28 $0.28 Total Plan Area Improvements $20,576,300 $5,219 $4,647 $3,105 $2,118 $2.99 $2.99 $2.99 $2.99 Administration (3%) $617,300 $157 $139 $93 $64 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 Total $21,193,600 $5,376 $4,786 $3,198 $2,182 $3.08 $3.08 $3.08 $3.08 Plan Area Formation Table C-5 $1,929,331 $2,883 $2,883 $2,883 $2,883 $2,883 $2,883 $2,883 $2,883 Administration (3%) $57,900 $86 $86 $86 $86 $86 $86 $86 $86 Total $1,987,231 $2,969 $2,969 $2,969 $2,969 $2,969 $2,969 $2,969 $2,969 Source: City of Rancho Cordova; MacKay & Somps; EPS.
per net acre
Cost Allocation
Residential
per unit per bldg. sq. ft.
Village Center Re gional Town Center
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 30 Public Improvements Cost Allocation and Fee Estimate Table 10. Cost Allocation Summary – Roadways and Trails (2026$)
Item
Square
Feet
Onsite
Roadways
Offsite
Roadways Trails Subtotal Admin. Total
(3%)
Source Table C-7 Table C-7 Table C-8
Plan Area Fee-Funded Costs $10,202,400 $2,217,900 $4,141,200 $16,561,500 $496,800 $17,058,300 Residential Land Uses
Single Family
Very Small <=800 $1,658 $360 $725 $2,743 $82 $2,825
Small 801-1200 $1,872 $407 $870 $3,149 $94 $3,243
Medium Small 1,201-1,600 $1,936 $421 $912 $3,269 $98 $3,367 Medium 1,601-2,400 $2,058 $447 $992 $3,497 $105 $3,602
Large >2,400 $2,193 $476 $1,087 $3,756 $113 $3,869
Multifamily
Very Small <=800 $1,302 $283 $411 $1,996 $60 $2,056
Small 801-1200 $1,471 $319 $529 $2,319 $70 $2,389
Medium Small 1,201-1,600 $1,552 $337 $583 $2,472 $74 $2,546 Medium 1,601-2,400 $1,552 $337 $583 $2,472 $74 $2,546
Large >2,400 $1,552 $337 $583 $2,472 $74 $2,546
Age-Restricted Single Family
Very Small <=800 $772 $168 $468 $1,408 $42 $1,450
Small 801-1200 $872 $189 $561 $1,622 $49 $1,671
Medium Small 1,201-1,600 $902 $196 $589 $1,687 $51 $1,738 Medium 1,601-2,400 $958 $208 $640 $1,806 $54 $1,860
Large >2,400 $1,021 $222 $701 $1,944 $58 $2,002
Age-Restricted Multifamily
Very Small <=800 $638 $139 $356 $1,133 $34 $1,167
Small 801-1200 $720 $156 $427 $1,303 $39 $1,342
Medium Small 1,201-1,600 $760 $165 $470 $1,395 $42 $1,437 Medium 1,601-2,400 $760 $165 $470 $1,395 $42 $1,437
Large >2,400 $760 $165 $470 $1,395 $42 $1,437
Commercial Land Uses
Village Center
Retail $1.86 $0.40 $0.00 $2.26 $0.07 $2.33
O
ffice $2.22 $0.48 $0.00 $2.70 $0.08 $2.78
Regional Town Center
Retail $1.86 $0.40 $0.00 $2.26 $0.07 $2.33
Office $2.22 $0.48 $0.00 $2.70 $0.08 $2.78
Source: City of Rancho Cordova; MacKay & Somps; EPS.
per unit
per bldg. sq. ft.
Cost Allocation
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 31 Public Improvements Cost Allocation and Fee Estimate
1. Determine the SCSP Fee Program costs. These costs were detailed in the previous chapter and are summarized in Table 9 and Table 10.
2. Determine the Dwelling Unit Equivalent (DUE) factor for each land use that serves as a measure of demand placed on the improvement relative to the demand of a single-family dwelling unit. Table 11 summarizes the DUE factors for the fee components for which the residential fees vary by unit type only, and Table 12 summarizes the DUE factors for the fee components for which the residential fees vary by unit type and square footage category.
Appendix B details the calculation of the DUE factors in Table 12.
3. For each land use, multiply the DUE factor by the number of units (dwelling units, 1,000 building square feet, or acres) to derive the total facility demand, measured by total DUEs. These total DUEs are shown in Table 11 and Table
12. These two tables are discussed further in the next section.
4. Use the DUE estimates from step 3 to calculate the percentage distribution of total demand across land uses.
5. Allocate the improvement costs to the individual land uses based on each land use’s percentage of total facility demand.
6. For all fee components except for the Plan Area Formation component, divide the allocated cost for each land use for which development is projected by the number of dwelling units or building square feet to determine the cost per unit or square foot.
7. No development is projected for some of the roadway and trails residential land uses that vary by square footage categories. For each of these land uses, calculate the cost per unit as the single-family medium cost per unit multiplied by the DUE factor for the particular land use.
These land use categories are established so that fees can be charged if development does occur in a specific category despite no development being projected. For example, no development is projected for large multifamily units over 2,400 square feet, but costs are calculated for use in establishing the roadway and trails fees for that category.
8. For the Plan Area Formation fee component, divide the allocated cost for each land use by the number of net developable acres to determine the cost per acre.
9. For each land use, add an additional 3 percent fee program administration component to determine the total fee.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 32 Public Improvements Cost Allocation and Fee Estimate Table 11. Summary of Total DUEs
Item Pct. Acres
Units/
Sq. Ft.
DUE
Factor DUEs
DUE
Factor DUEs
DUE
Factor DUEs
DUE Factor Basis
Residential Land Uses units per unit per acre per acre
Low Density 163.0 840 1.00 840 0.40 65 1.00 163
Medium Density 367.1 2,369 1.00 2,369 0.50 184 1.00 367 Compact Density Residential 27.5 314 0.75 236 0.70 19 1.00 28 High Density Residential 44.2 999 0.75 749 0.70 31 1.00 44 Total Residential 601.8 4,522 4,194 299 602
Commercial Land Uses bldg. sq. ft. per acre per acre per acre Village Center
Retail 90% 19.7 203,909 4.00 79 0.90 18 1.00 20
Office 10% 2.2 22,657 4.00 9 0.90 2 1.00 2
Subtotal Village Center 21.9 226,566 88 20 22
Regional Town Center
Retail 90% 41.0 424,580 4.00 164 0.90 37 1.00 41
Office 10% 4.6 47,176 4.00 18 0.90 4 1.00 5
Subtotal Regional Town Center 45.6 471,755 182 41 46
Total Commercial 67.5 698,321 270 61 68
TOTAL 669.3 4,464 360 669
Source: City of Rancho Cordova; EPS.
[1] Residential and commercial allocation factors from Sacramento County Water Agency. [2] Allocation factors are the impervious surface factors per acre from the City and County of Sacramento Drainage Manual.
Land Use Water [1]
gal. per min. - peak hr. impervious surface acres
Drainage [2]
Wetland Mitigation,
Wetland Preserve
Buffer, and Plan
Area Formation
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 33 Public Improvements Cost Allocation and Fee Estimate Table 12. Summary of Roadways and Trails DUEs
Item Pct.
Units/
Sq. Ft.
DUE
Factor DUEs
DUE
Factor DUEs
DUE Factor Basis
Residential Land Uses units per unit per unit
Single Family
Very Small <=800 0 0.81 0 0.73 0
Small 801-1200 35 0.91 32 0.88 31
Medium Small 1,201-1,600 352 0.94 331 0.92 324
Medium 1,601-2,400 1,762 1.00 1,762 1.00 1,762
Large >2,400 1,374 1.07 1,464 1.10 1,505
Subtotal 3,523 3,589 3,622
Multifamily
Very Small <=800 0 0.63 0 0.41 0
Small 801-1200 659 0.71 471 0.53 352
Medium Small 1,201-1,600 340 0.75 256 0.59 200
Medium 1,601-2,400 0 0.75 0 0.59 0
Large >2,400 0 0.75 0 0.59 0
Subtotal 999 727 551
Age-Restricted Single Family
Very Small <=800 0 0.38 0 0.47 0
Small 801-1200 0 0.42 0 0.57 0
Medium Small 1,201-1,600 0 0.44 0 0.59 0
Medium 1,601-2,400 0 0.47 0 0.65 0
Large >2,400 0 0.50 0 0.71 0
S u b t o t a l 000
Age-Restricted Multifamily
Very Small <=800 0 0.31 0 0.36 0
Small 801-1200 0 0.35 0 0.43 0
Medium Small 1,201-1,600 0 0.37 0 0.47 0
Medium 1,601-2,400 0 0.37 0 0.47 0
Large >2,400 0 0.37 0 0.47 0
S u b t o t a l 000
Total Residential 4,522 4,316 4,173
Commercial Land Uses
Village Center
per 1K sq. ft.
Retail 90% 203,909 0.90 184 0.00 0
Office 10% 22,657 1.08 24 0.00 0
Subtotal 226,566 208 0
Regional Town Center
Retail 90% 424,580 0.90 383 0.00 0
Office 10% 47,176 1.08 51 0.00 0
Subtotal 471,755 434 0
Total Commercial 698,321 642 0
Total DUEs 4,958 4,173
Source: City of Rancho Cordova; EPS.
[1] See Table B-4 for calculation of allocation factors. vehicle miles travelled persons per household
Land Use Roadways [1] Trails [1]
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 34 Public Improvements Cost Allocation and Fee Estimate Cost Allocation by Component
As outlined above, DUE factors are used to allocate improvement costs to each land use based on the land use’s demand placed on an improvement type relative to the demand from a single-family unit. As discussed in steps 2 and 3, for each improvement type, Table 11 and Table 12 summarize the basis for the DUE factors, the DUE factors by land use, and the total DUEs by land use—including all residential and commercial land uses.
The two commercial land uses, Village Center and Regional Town Center, both include retail and office components. It is anticipated that most of the commercial development will be retail development. For the purposes of establishing DUE factors and estimating the allocation of costs among the residential and commercial land uses, it is assumed that the Village Center and Regional Town Center development will be composed of 90 percent retail uses and 10 percent office uses.
The calculation of the roadway and trails DUE factors for the residential fee categories (that vary by unit type and square footage category) is detailed in Appendix B. The cost allocations by improvement type are detailed in Appendix C. The remainder of this chapter discusses the cost allocation for each fee component.
Water
The water DUE factors are established using peak hour water usage, as measured in gallons per minute (GPM), to estimate relative demand for water facilities by land use. The DUE factors by land use are calculated as the GPM per unit (residential dwelling unit or commercial acre) relative to the GPM for a low-density single-family unit. The residential and commercial DUE factors are equivalent to the factors used by the Sacramento County Water Agency in its fee program.
Table C-1 details the water cost allocation using the water costs established in the previous chapter, the DUE factors from Table 11, and the methodology outlined at the beginning of this chapter.
Storm Drainage
The storm drainage DUE factors are established using runoff estimates, as measured by impervious surface factors, to estimate relative demand for storm drainage improvements by land use. The DUE factors by land use are equivalent to the impervious surface percentage per acre. The impervious surface percentages per acre were obtained from the City and County of Sacramento Drainage Manual.
Table C-2 details the storm drainage cost allocation using the storm drainage costs established in the previous chapter, the DUE factors from Table 11, and the methodology outlined at the beginning of this chapter.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 35 Public Improvements Cost Allocation and Fee Estimate Wetland Mitigation for Backbone Infrastructure, Wetland Preserve Buffer, and Plan Area Formation
The DUE factors for wetland mitigation for backbone infrastructure, wetland preserve buffers, and plan area formation are all established on the basis of acres.
The need for the creation of wetlands and a wetland preserve buffer is generated by all development that directly or indirectly disturbs the existing wetlands. One acre of any type of residential or commercial development is estimated to have roughly the same impact on the wetlands and, thus, to derive the same benefit from the wetland improvements. Likewise, each acre of development is assumed to derive the same benefit from the plan area formation tasks that must occur before development can occur in the SCSP. To reflect the equal benefit derived from each acre of development, the DUE factors used to allocate the wetland mitigation, wetland preserve buffer, and plan formation costs to the land uses are all set to 1 DUE per acre.
Table C-3 details the wetland mitigation for backbone infrastructure cost allocation, Table C-4 details the wetland preserve buffer cost allocation, and Table C-5 details the plan formation cost allocation. Each of these cost allocation tables uses the costs established in the previous chapter, the DUE factors of 1 DUE per acre from Table 11, and the methodology outlined at the beginning of this chapter.
Plan Area Formation Fee Reimbursements by Landowner
The Plan Area Formation fee component is charged and collected per net acre for both residential and commercial land uses. Public and other land uses, including roads, schools, parks, detention basins, public/quasi-public parcels, wetland preserves and wetland buffers, are not included in the base for allocation of the Plan Area Formation costs.
Since the SunCreek property owners participated in the funding of Plan Area Formation costs to different degrees, the amounts paid by individual property owners will be more or less than their fair share obligation based on the number of developable acres on their property relative to the total number of developable acres in the SCSP. Additionally, the landowner applying for the final map may be a successor in interest to the property owner who paid the Plan Area Formation costs and is entitled to the reimbursement under this fee component.
The payment and reimbursement of Plan Area Formation costs will be handled as follows:
1. Appendix E details the total Plan Area Formation costs incurred, as well as the amounts paid by landowner.
2. Table C-6 details the estimated Plan Area Formation reimbursements or fees owed by landowner.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 36 Public Improvements Cost Allocation and Fee Estimate
3. At final map submittal, the landowner will receive fee credits up to the amount of Plan Area Formation costs that they have paid. They will be required to pay fees for any remaining fee obligation in excess of the costs they have paid, including fees for costs paid by a predecessor in interest on their property who is entitled to the reimbursement of those costs.
4. Plan Area Formation fee revenue collected will be used to reimburse other landowners, including a predecessor in interest on their property, if applicable, for costs the other landowners paid in excess of their fee obligation.
Roadways
Appendix B details the calculation of the DUE factors for roadway improvements.
The DUE factors are established using daily vehicle miles traveled to measure relative demand for roadway infrastructure by land use. The vehicle miles traveled are calculated as a combination of the estimated daily trips per household, average trip length, and percentage of trips considered to be newly originated trips. The DUE factors by land use are calculated as the vehicle miles traveled per unit (residential dwelling unit or commercial 1,000 building square feet) relative to the vehicle miles traveled for a medium single-family unit.
Table C-7 details the on-site and off-site roads cost allocations, using the roads costs established in the previous chapter, the residential and commercial DUE factors from Table 12, and the methodology outlined at the beginning of this chapter.
Trails
Appendix B details the calculation of the DUE factors for trail improvements. The DUE factors are established using population, as measured by persons per household, to estimate relative demand for trails by land use. The DUE factors by residential land use are calculated as the estimated persons per household relative to the persons per household for a medium single-family unit. Trails costs are not allocated to commercial development, as the trail system is primarily planned to serve the residents of the SCSP.
Table C-8 details the trails cost allocation using the costs established in the previous chapter, the DUE factors from Table 12, and the methodology outlined at the beginning of this chapter.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 37 Nexus Findings
5. Nexus Findings
Authority
This report has been prepared to update the SCSP Fee Program fees in accordance with the procedural guidelines established in the Mitigation Fee Act, which are codified in California Government Code (CGC) Section 66000 et. seq. The Mitigation Fee Act sets forth the procedural requirements for establishing and collecting development impact fees.
In particular, CGC Section 66001 includes specific requirements for establishing a reasonable relationship or nexus between the development impact fee, and CGC Section 66016.5 (added in 2021 to address the provisions of AB 602) includes additional requirements for development impact fees. The remainder of this chapter addresses the requirements of CGC Section 66001 and CGC Section 66016.5.
California Government Code Section 66001
CGC Section 66001 requires that a “reasonable relationship or nexus must exist between a governmental exaction and the purpose of the condition.”5 Specifically, each local agency imposing a development impact fee must make the following findings:
• Identify the purpose of the fee.
• Identify how the fee is to be used.
• Determine how a reasonable relationship exists between the fee’s use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. • Determine how a reasonable relationship exists between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.
• Demonstrate how a reasonable relationship exists between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed.
For each SCSP Fee component, the fees to be collected by land use are calculated based on the proportionate share of the total public facility use that each land use represents. Using this approach results in legally justifiable development impact fees. This section details the nexus findings for each SCSP Fee component that is addressed in this report.
5 Public Needs & Private Dollars; William Abbott, Marian E. Moe, and Marilee Hanson, page 109.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 38 Nexus Findings
Water
Purpose of Fee
New development in the SCSP will result in in the need for new water infrastructure to serve the new service population. The purpose of the SCSP water fee is to provide funding to construct water improvements needed to adequately serve the new service population.
Use of Fee
The SCSP water fees will be used to construct water facilities needed to accommodate increased demand projected as a result of new development. Water system improvements funded through the SCSP Fee Program include construction of local and regional transmission mains.
Relationship Between Use of Fee and Type of Development The SCSP water fees will be used to construct the water system infrastructure needed to adequately serve the new service population as the result of new development. A reasonable relationship exists between the use of the water fees and the residential and commercial development on which the fees are imposed because the fees will be used to construct the water system infrastructure needed to serve the new residents and employees generated by the new development.
Relationship Between Need for Facility and Type of Development New residential and commercial development in the SCSP will generate new residents and employees that will result in the need for new water system capacity to provide adequate service to the SCSP’s service population. A reasonable relationship exists between the need for water system improvements and the type of new residential and commercial development projects because the new water system improvements must be constructed to accommodate the new development types that will place an increased demand on the water system.
Relationship Between Amount of Fee and Cost of Facility or Portion of Facility Attributed to Development on Which Fee is Imposed The total cost of improvements funded by the SCSP water fee is allocated among the projected new residential and commercial land uses in the SCSP at buildout based on the relative demand each land use is anticipated to place upon the improvements. Cost allocation factors based on water usage, as measured in peak hour gallons per minute, are used to measure the relative demand generated by each land use and to allocate the water costs across all benefitting land uses in the SCSP. A reasonable relationship exists between the amount of the SCSP water fees and the costs of the facilities attributable to the new residential and commercial development on which the fees are imposed because the fees are derived using appropriate cost allocation factors as measures of the proportional demand generated by each development type.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 39 Nexus Findings
Storm Drainage
Purpose of Fee
New development in the SCSP will result in increased storm water runoff generated by the addition of impervious surface area created by the new development. New storm drainage infrastructure will be needed to provide protection against flooding to the new SCSP service population associated with the new development. The purpose of the SCSP storm drainage fee is to provide funding to construct specific storm drainage improvements needed to serve the new SCSP service population.
Use of Fee
The SCSP storm drainage fees will be used to construct and expand storm drainage infrastructure to accommodate increased demand for flood protection as a result of new development. Storm drainage system improvements funded through the SCSP Fee Program include infrastructure needed to provide drainage for the backbone roadway system planned in the SCSP.
Relationship Between Use of Fee and Type of Development The SCSP storm drainage fees will be used to construct storm drainage infrastructure to adequately serve an increased service population as the result of new development. A reasonable relationship exists between the use of the storm drainage fees and the residential and commercial development on which the fees are imposed because the fees will be used to construct storm drainage system infrastructure needed to provide flood protection to the new residents and employees generated by the new development.
Relationship Between Need for Facility and Type of Development New residential and commercial development in the SCSP will generate new residents and employees that will result in the need for additional storm drainage infrastructure to provide adequate flood protection to the SCSP’s service population. A reasonable relationship exists between the need for storm drainage improvements and the type of new residential and commercial development projects because the storm drainage infrastructure must be constructed to accommodate the new development types that will place an increased demand on the storm drainage system.
Relationship Between Amount of Fee and Cost of Facility or Portion of Facility Attributed to Development on Which Fee is Imposed The total cost of improvements funded by the SCSP storm drainage fee is allocated among the projected new residential and commercial land uses in the SCSP at buildout based on the relative demand each land use is anticipated to place upon the improvements. Cost allocation factors based on the need for drainage improvements, as measured by impervious surface area generated by each land use type, are used to measure the relative demand generated by each land use and to allocate the ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 40 Nexus Findings
storm drainage costs across all benefitting land uses in the SCSP. A reasonable relationship exists between the amount of the SCSP storm drainage fees and the costs of the facilities attributable to the new residential and commercial development on which the fees are imposed because the fees are derived using appropriate cost allocation factors as measures of the proportional demand generated by each development type.
Wetland Mitigation for Backbone Infrastructure
Purpose of Fee
New backbone infrastructure must be constructed to serve new development in the SCSP, which will result in the disturbance of existing wetlands and the need to provide additional habitat to meet federal requirements for protecting and conserving threatened and endangered species. The purpose of the SCSP wetland mitigation fee is to provide funding for payment of the South Sacramento HCP fees that will be imposed on the construction of SCSP backbone infrastructure to fund the acquisition and maintenance required wetlands.
Use of Fee
The SCSP wetlands mitigation fee will be used for the payment of South Sacramento HCP fees to mitigate for the disturbance of existing wetlands caused by the construction of backbone infrastructure needed to serve new development.
Relationship Between Use of Fee and Type of Development The SCSP wetlands mitigation fee will be used to pay the required South Sacramento HCP fees to mitigate for the disturbance of existing wetlands as the result of the construction of new backbone infrastructure needed to serve new development. A reasonable relationship exists between the use of the wetlands mitigation fees and the residential and commercial development on which the fees are imposed because the fees will be used to mitigate for the disturbance of existing wetlands caused by the construction of backbone infrastructure serving the new development.
Relationship Between Need for Facility and Type of Development New residential and commercial development in the SCSP will generate new residents and employees and the need for additional backbone infrastructure that will disturb existing wetlands and require the construction of new wetlands to meet federal requirements. A reasonable relationship exists between the need for wetland mitigation and the type of new residential and commercial development projects because new wetlands must be constructed to mitigate for the disturbed wetlands caused by the new development types.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 41 Nexus Findings
Relationship Between Amount of Fee and Cost of Facility or Portion of Facility Attributed to Development on Which Fee is Imposed The total cost of improvements funded by the SCSP wetlands mitigation fee is allocated among the projected new residential and commercial land uses in the SCSP at buildout based on the relative need for wetlands mitigation generated by each land use. Cost allocation factors based on acreage are used to measure the relative demand generated by each land use and to allocate the wetlands mitigation costs across all benefitting land uses in the SCSP. Acres are used to allocate costs because it is assumed that each acre of residential and commercial development, regardless of the development type, will result in an approximately equal need for backbone infrastructure and the resulting wetlands disturbance that must be mitigated. A reasonable relationship exists between the amount of the SCSP wetland mitigation fees and the costs of the facilities attributable to the new residential and commercial development on which the fees are imposed because the fees are derived using appropriate cost allocation factors as measures of the proportional demand generated by each development type.
Wetland Preserve Buffer
Purpose of Fee
More than 205 acres of wetland preserve areas and roughly 45 acres of wetland buffer areas, to provide protection for the wetland preserves, are planned in the SCSP. The purpose of the SCSP wetland preserve buffer fee is to provide funding to construct improvements in the planned wetland buffer areas.
Use of Fee
The SCSP wetland preserve buffer fee will be used for construction of wetland preserve buffer improvements, including minimal buffer landscaping and post and cable barriers.
Relationship Between Use of Fee and Type of Development The SCSP wetland preserve buffer fee will be used to construct improvements in the wetland buffers needed to provide protection for the wetland preserves, which are required to mitigate for the disturbance of existing wetlands as the result of new development. A reasonable relationship exists between the use of the wetland preserve buffer fees and the residential and commercial development on which the fees are imposed because the fees will be used to fund improvements needed to mitigate for the disturbance of existing wetlands caused by the new development.
Relationship Between Need for Facility and Type of Development New residential and commercial development in the SCSP will generate new residents and employees and the need for the construction of improvements in the wetlands buffers to provide protection for the wetland preserves required to mitigate for the disturbance of existing wetlands caused by new development. A reasonable relationship exists between the need for wetland buffers and the type of new residential and commercial development projects because new wetland buffers are required to mitigate for disturbed wetlands caused by the new development types.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 42 Nexus Findings
Relationship Between Amount of Fee and Cost of Facility or Portion of Facility Attributed to Development on Which Fee is Imposed The total cost of improvements funded by the SCSP wetland preserve buffer fee is allocated among the projected new residential and commercial land uses in the SCSP at buildout based on the relative need for the wetland buffers generated by each land use. Cost allocation factors based on acreage are used to measure the relative demand generated by each land use and to allocate the wetland buffers costs across all benefitting land uses in the SCSP. Acres are used to allocate costs because it is assumed that each acre of residential and commercial development, regardless of the development type, will result in an approximately equal disturbance of wetlands and need for wetland preserve buffers. A reasonable relationship exists between the amount of the SCSP wetland preserve buffer fees and the costs of the facilities attributable to the new residential and commercial development on which the fees are imposed because the fees are derived using appropriate cost allocation factors as measures of the proportional demand generated by each development type.
Plan Area Formation
Purpose of Fee
Prior to, and in the time since approval of the SunCreek Specific Plan in 2013, the SunCreek Owners’ Group has worked with the City to prepare various studies and reports, as well as specific plan amendments, which are necessary for development in the SCSP to occur. Property owners have incurred the costs of this work associated with the Plan Area formation and will be reimbursed through the SCSP Fee Program.
The purpose of the SCSP plan area formation fee is to provide funding to reimburse the owners for the accrued plan area formation costs.
Use of Fee
The SCSP plan formation fee will be used to fund the costs incurred by the property owners to perform the necessary work for development to occur in the SCSP.
Relationship Between Use of Fee and Type of Development The SCSP plan area formation fee will be used to fund the plan area formation studies and other work needed before development can occur in the SCSP. A reasonable relationship exists between the use of the plan area formation fees and the residential and commercial development on which the fees are imposed because the fees will be used to fund the plan area formation costs incurred to facilitate development in the SCSP.
Relationship Between Need for Facility and Type of Development Before new residential and commercial development in the SCSP can occur, required studies and other related work must be completed. A reasonable relationship exists between the need for the SCSP plan area formation work and the type of new residential and commercial development projects because the work must be completed before the new development types will be allowed to occur.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 43 Nexus Findings
Relationship Between Amount of Fee and Cost of Facility or Portion of Facility Attributed to Development on Which Fee is Imposed The total cost of the plan area work funded by the plan area formation fee is allocated among the projected new residential and commercial land uses in the SCSP at buildout based on the relative need for the funding of the plan area formation tasks generated by each land use. Cost allocation factors based on acreage are used to measure the relative demand generated by each land use and to allocate the plan area formation costs across all benefitting land uses in the SCSP. Acres are used to allocate costs because it is assumed that each acre of residential and commercial development, regardless of the development type, will result in approximately an equal requirement for the funding of the plan area formation tasks. A reasonable relationship exists between the amount of the SCSP plan area formation fees and the costs of the plan area formation tasks attributable to the new residential and commercial development on which the fees are imposed because the fees are derived using appropriate cost allocation factors as measures of the proportional demand generated by each development type.
Roadways
Purpose of Fee
New development in the SCSP will result in an increase in the service population and, therefore, in the demand placed on the City’s transportation infrastructure.
The purpose of the SCSP roadway fee is to provide funding to maintain adequate levels of service on public roads through the expansion of existing on-site and off- site roadway facilities and construction of new roadway facilities.
Use of Fee
The SCSP roadway fees will be used to construct and expand roadway facilities to accommodate future traffic volumes projected as a result of new development.
Roadway improvements to be funded by the SCSP Fees include on-site traffic signal construction and modifications, as well as off-site improvements for which the SCSP has a reciprocal funding agreement with the County.
Relationship Between Use of Fee and Type of Development The SCSP roadway fees will be used to construct roadway improvements needed to adequately serve an increased service population as the result of the new development. A reasonable relationship exists between the use of the Road Fees and the residential and commercial development on which the fees are imposed because the fees will be used to construct the roadway system to serve the new residents and employees generated by the new development.
Relationship Between Need for Facility and Type of Development New residential and commercial development in the SCSP will generate new residents and employees that will result in new vehicular trips and the need for additional roadway capacity to maintain adequate levels of service. A reasonable ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 44 Nexus Findings
relationship exists between the need for roadway improvements and the type of new residential and nonresidential development projects because the capacity of the roadway system must be expanded to accommodate the new development types that will place an increased demand on the roadway system.
Relationship Between Amount of Fee and Cost of Facility or Portion of Facility Attributed to Development on Which Fee is Imposed The total cost of improvements funded by the SCSP roadway fee is allocated among the projected new residential and nonresidential land uses in the SCSP at buildout based on the relative demand each land use is anticipated to place upon the improvements. Cost allocation factors based on vehicle miles travelled are used to measure the relative demand generated by each land use and to allocate the roadway costs across all benefitting land uses in the SCSP. A reasonable relationship exists between the amount of the SCSP Road Fees and the costs of the facilities attributable to the new residential and nonresidential development on which the fees are imposed because the fees are derived using appropriate cost allocation factors as measures of the proportional demand generated by each development type.
Trails
Purpose of Fee
New development in the SCSP will result in new residents and in the need for a bicycle and pedestrian trail system in the SCSP that creates connectivity between residential, commercial, employment, transit, and recreation destinations. The purpose of the SCSP trails fee is to provide funding to construct a trails system that serves the residents of the SCSP and connects to the Citywide trails network.
Use of Fee
The SCSP trails fee will be used to fund the construction of a trails system to serve the residents of the SCSP.
Relationship Between Use of Fee and Type of Development The SCSP trails fees will be used to construct bicycle and pedestrian trails needed to serve the projected new residents of the SCSP. A reasonable relationship exists between the use of the trails fees and the residential development on which the fees are imposed because the fees will be used to construct the trails system to serve the new residents generated by the new development.
Relationship Between Need for Facility and Type of Development New residential development in the SCSP will generate new residents, resulting in the need for a bicycle and pedestrian trails system to provide connectivity within the SCSP and to the City trails system, as well as a desired level of service to the residents. A reasonable relationship exists between the need for the trails system and the type of new residential development projects because the trails system ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 45 Nexus Findings
must be created to accommodate the new development types that will benefit from the trails.
Relationship Between Amount of Fee and Cost of Facility or Portion of Facility Attributed to Development on Which Fee is Imposed The total cost of improvements funded by the SCSP trails fee is allocated among the projected new residential land uses in the SCSP at buildout based on the relative benefit from the trails system generated by each land use. Cost allocation factors based on the people who will use the trails system, as measured by persons per household, are used to measure the relative demand generated by each land use and to allocate the trails costs across all benefitting residential land uses in the SCSP. A reasonable relationship exists between the amount of the SCSP trails fees and the costs of the improvements attributable to the new residential development on which the fees are imposed because the fees are derived using appropriate cost allocation factors as measures of the proportional demand generated by each residential development type.
California Government Code Section 66016.5 (AB 602)
As noted earlier in this document, this nexus analysis must consider the newly created CGC Section 66016.5. This section stipulates that a jurisdiction must calculate residential development impact fees proportionately to the square footage of the dwelling units, with the exception of water and sewer fees and any other fees for which specific findings can be made as to why the fees should not be enacted on a square foot basis.
In this report, residential fees are calculated as shown below:
Water, Storm Drainage, Wetland Mitigation for Backbone Infrastructure, Wetland Preserve Buffer, and Plan Area Formation
Fees by dwelling unit type
Roadways and Trails
Fees by dwelling unit type and square foot ranges
The water fees need no further justification as they are exempted from the proportionality requirement of CGC Section 66016.5. However, the required findings detailed in CGC Section 66016.5 must be made for the remaining fee components. The specific requirements and findings for each fee component are detailed in the remainder of this chapter.
Requirements for Exceptions to Fee Proportional to Housing Square Footage
CGS Section 66016.5(a)(5)(A) states, among other things, that fees “imposed on a housing development project proportionately to the square footage of the ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 46 Nexus Findings
proposed units of the development shall be deemed to have used a valid method to establish a reasonable relationship between the fee charged and the burden posed by the development.” However, Section 66016.5(a)(5)(B) states that a nexus study “is not required to comply with this proportionality requirement if the local agency makes the following findings:
1. An explanation as to why square footage is not an appropriate metric to calculate fees imposed on a housing development project.
2. An explanation that an alternative basis of calculating the fee bears a reasonable relationship between the fee charged and the burden posed by the development.
3. That other policies in the fee structure support smaller developments or otherwise ensure that smaller developments are not charged disproportionate fees.”
Storm Drainage
a) An explanation as to why square footage is not an appropriate metric to calculate fees imposed on a housing development project.
New imperious surfaces drive the demand for drainage facilities. In housing developments, new impervious surfaces incorporate the footprint on a parcel, capturing ground floor living spaces as well as driveways, sidewalks, patios and other such surfaces. A square footage of proposed units basis would introduce inequities. For example, a two-story home with the same footprint as a single-story home would pay twice the fee while causing an identical impact on the drainage system. This inequity would be amplified in multistory apartment and condominium buildings or towers.
b) An explanation that an alternative basis of calculating the fee bears a reasonable relationship between the fee charged and the burden posed by the development.
For storm water runoff, the standard, customary and equitable method to establish a reasonable relationship between the fee charged, the facilities required, and the type of development on which the fee is imposed is with a direct measure of new impermeable surfaces. New runoff as a result of development establishes the demand for new or improved capacity, the cost of which is the basis of the fee. c) That other policies in the fee structure support smaller developments or otherwise ensure that smaller developments are not charged disproportionate fees.
A fee basis of impermeable square footage ensures equity for the allocation of the cost of the impact from development. The fee is proportional to the impact caused by new impermeable surfaces. Smaller developments with identical unit footprints will have the same fees. Smaller footprints will have proportionately lower fees.
Similarly, multifamily apartment buildings will have lower impacts and fees on a per unit basis as the size of the units decline and/or the number of floors increases.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 47 Nexus Findings
Wetland Mitigation for Backbone Infrastructure
a) An explanation as to why square footage is not an appropriate metric to calculate fees imposed on a housing development project.
New residential and commercial acreage drives the demand for backbone infrastructure, which will result in the disturbance of existing wetlands and the need to provide additional habitat to meet federal requirements for protecting and conserving threatened and endangered species. It is assumed that each acre of residential and commercial development, regardless of the development type or size, will result in an approximately equal need for backbone infrastructure and the resulting wetlands disturbance that must be mitigated.
In housing developments, a fee based on the square footage of proposed units would introduce inequities for the fees related to some types of backbone infrastructure, such as storm drainage (as discussed above), water, and sewer improvements. As discussed above, the need for storm drainage improvements is based on impervious surface. In addition, the need for sewer and water improvements is generally based on sewer and water usage, which is not directly related to unit size. A residential fee based on unit type would be more equitable because each unit type, regardless of square footage, would have approximately the same acreage and the same impact on the need for all types of backbone infrastructure (e.g., roads, sewer, water, storm drainage). b) An explanation that an alternative basis of calculating the fee bears a reasonable relationship between the fee charged and the burden posed by the development.
For wetland mitigation required because of the construction of backbone infrastructure, a standard, customary and equitable method to establish a reasonable relationship between the fee charged, the facilities required, and the type of development on which the fee is imposed is based on new developable acreage. New developable acreage establishes the demand for new or improved backbone infrastructure, the cost of which is the basis of the fee. c) That other policies in the fee structure support smaller developments or otherwise ensure that smaller developments are not charged disproportionate fees.
A fee basis of acreage ensures equity for the allocation of the cost of the impact from development. The fees are proportional to the impact caused by the different development types. Denser single-family unit types, with greater units per acre, will have lower fees than less dense single-family unit types. Denser developments generally have smaller units with lower square footage, and thus, smaller units generally pay lower fees. Similarly, multifamily apartment buildings are generally denser than single-family developments and have lower fees on a per unit basis than single-family units. Multifamily units also tend to be smaller than single-family units, and thus these smaller units pay lower fees.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 48 Nexus Findings
Wetland Preserve Buffer
a) An explanation as to why square footage is not an appropriate metric to calculate fees imposed on a housing development project.
New residential and commercial acreage drives the demand for wetland preserve buffers. Acres are used to allocate costs because each acre of residential and commercial development, regardless of the development type, will result in an approximately equal disturbance of wetlands and need for wetland preserve buffers. In housing developments, a fee based on the square footage of proposed units would introduce inequities. A residential fee based on unit type would be more equitable because each unit type, regardless of square footage, would have approximately the same acreage and the same impact on the disturbance of wetlands and need for wetland preserve buffers.
b) An explanation that an alternative basis of calculating the fee bears a reasonable relationship between the fee charged and the burden posed by the development.
For required wetland preserve buffers, an equitable method to establish a reasonable relationship between the fee charged, the wetland preserve buffers required, and the type of development on which the fee is imposed is based on new developable acreage. New developable acreage establishes the demand for new wetland preserve buffers, the cost of which is the basis of the fee. c) That other policies in the fee structure support smaller developments or otherwise ensure that smaller developments are not charged disproportionate fees.
A fee basis of acreage ensures equity for the allocation of the cost of the impact from development. The fees are proportional to the impact caused by the different development types. Denser single-family unit types, with greater units per acre, will have lower fees than less dense single-family unit types. Denser developments generally have smaller units with lower square footage, and thus, smaller units generally pay lower fees. Similarly, multifamily apartment buildings are generally denser than single-family developments and have lower fees on a per unit basis than single-family units. Multifamily units also tend to be smaller than single-family units, and thus these smaller units pay lower fees.
Plan Area Formation
a) An explanation as to why square footage is not an appropriate metric to calculate fees imposed on a housing development project.
New residential and commercial acreage drives the need for plan area formation studies and other studies that were required before development could occur in the SCSP. Acres are used to allocate costs because each acre of residential and commercial development, regardless of the development type, will result in approximately an equal requirement for the funding of the plan area formation tasks. In housing developments, a fee based on the square footage of proposed ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 49 Nexus Findings
units would introduce inequities. A residential fee based on unit type would be more equitable because each unit type, regardless of square footage, would have approximately the same acreage and the same impact on the need for plan area formation studies.
b) An explanation that an alternative basis of calculating the fee bears a reasonable relationship between the fee charged and the burden posed by the development.
For required plan area formation studies, an equitable method to establish a reasonable relationship between the fee charged, the studies required, and the type of development on which the fee is imposed is based on new developable acreage. New developable acreage establishes the demand for plan area formation studies, the cost of which is the basis of the fee.
c) That other policies in the fee structure support smaller developments or otherwise ensure that smaller developments are not charged disproportionate fees.
A fee basis of acreage ensures equity for the allocation of the cost of the impact from development. The fees are proportional to the impact caused by the different development types. Denser single-family unit types, with greater units per acre, will have lower fees than less dense single-family unit types. Denser developments generally have smaller units with lower square footage, and thus, smaller units generally pay lower fees. Similarly, multifamily apartment buildings are generally denser than single-family developments and have lower fees on a per unit basis than single-family units. Multifamily units also tend to be smaller than single-family units, and thus these smaller units pay lower fees.
Roadways
a) An explanation as to why square footage is not an appropriate metric to calculate fees imposed on a housing development project.
The SCSP roadway costs are allocated to dwelling units on a trips basis in the form of VMT per unit, which relies on transportation factors (number of trips, length of trips), as well as on persons per household, as persons per household has a direct relationship to the number of daily trips. The persons per household data provided in this report supports identification of an increasing number of people per household and trips per household as a dwelling unit size increases. However, the data present limitations on both the lower/smaller unit size range and on the higher/larger unit size range. For example, regardless of how small a dwelling unit may be, the minimum assumed persons per unit would be 1. Similarly, as home size continues to increase, the data are not as conclusive that the number of persons per unit and daily trips per unit continue to increase in a linear or otherwise determinant fashion. For these reasons, deriving a fee directly calculated on residential building square footage alone is not an appropriate metric to calculate the SCSP Program roadway fees.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 50 Nexus Findings
b) An explanation that an alternative basis of calculating the fee bears a reasonable relationship between the fee charged and the burden posed by the development.
As summarized in Chapter 2 and detailed in Appendix B, the number of people per household, trips per household, and VMT per household show a pattern of increasing as unit size increases. Thus, implementing the fee based on ranges of building square feet for residential development bears a reasonable relationship between the fee charged and the burden posed by the development because units that fall in the lower building unit size range pay a lower fee than units that fall in a higher building unit size range, which is proportional to the estimated number of people per household by unit size within each size range. c) That other policies in the fee structure support smaller developments or otherwise ensure that smaller developments are not charged disproportionate fees.
Implementation of the Fee Program roadway fees for residential development by building square foot range achieves the objective that smaller residential units would be charged a lower fee than larger units and ensures proportionality of fees based on relative demand for the facilities, as documented in this report.
Trails
a) An explanation as to why square footage is not an appropriate metric to calculate fees imposed on a housing development project.
The SCSP trails costs are allocated to dwelling units based on persons per household. The persons per household data provided in this report supports identification of an increasing number of people per household as dwelling unit size increase. However, the data present limitations on both the lower/smaller unit size range and on the higher/larger unit size range. For example, regardless of how small a dwelling unit may be, the minimum assumed persons per unit would be 1.
Similarly, as home size continues to increase, the data are not as conclusive that the number of persons per unit continues to increase in a linear or otherwise determinant fashion. For these reasons, deriving a fee directly calculated on residential building square footage alone is not an appropriate metric to calculate the Fee Program trails fees.
b) An explanation that an alternative basis of calculating the fee bears a reasonable relationship between the fee charged and the burden posed by the development.
As summarized in Chapter 2 and detailed in Appendix B, the number of people per household shows a pattern of increasing as unit size increases. Thus, implementing the fee based on ranges of building square feet for residential development bears a reasonable relationship between the fee charged and the burden posed by the development because units that fall in a lower building unit size range pay a lower fee than units that fall in a higher building unit size range, which is proportional to the estimated number of people per household by unit size within each size range.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 51 Nexus Findings
c) That other policies in the fee structure support smaller developments or otherwise ensure that smaller developments are not charged disproportionate fees.
Implementation of the Fee Program trails fees for residential development by building square foot range achieves the objective that smaller residential units would be charged a lower fee than larger units and ensures proportionality of fees based on relative demand for the facilities, as documented in this report.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 52 Fee Program Implementation and Administration
6. Fee Program Implementation and
Administration
The SCSP fees presented in this Nexus Study Update are based on the best land use and cost estimates available at the time this report was prepared. The proposed Fee Program update will be approved by the City through an updated Fee Program ordinance, if required, and a resolution to set the amount of the fees.
The proposed fees are shown in Table 1 and Table 2 of this report. As detailed in prior chapters of this report, the fees include components for each different type of public improvement, as well as a 3 percent fee administration component for the City to administer the Fee Program. If development projections, improvement requirements and costs, or funding sources other than development impact fees change significantly, the fees should be adjusted accordingly.
The SCSP Fee Program applies to all residential and nonresidential commercial development in the SCSP. It is independent and separate from all other City, Sacramento County (County), other agency, or regional development impact fees that will be applicable to SCSP development. The SCSP fees in effect shall be paid at the time that a building permit is issued. If a private developer constructs improvements included in the Fee Program, the developer will be eligible to receive fee credits or reimbursements.
The remainder of this chapter provides a summary of the key implementation and administrative elements for the SCSP Fee Program.
Fee Program Updates
Annual Inflation Update
The SCSP Fee Program includes annual adjustments to account for the inflation of public facilities design, construction, installation, and acquisition costs unless there is a Periodic Update (described below) in the same year. In January of each year, the SCSP fees shall be adjusted by the percentage change in the average of the Engineering-News Record’s San Francisco and 20-City Construction Cost Indices for the 12-month period ending in October of the previous year.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 53 Fee Program Implementation and Administration Periodic Update for Significant Adjustments
The City will perform periodic reviews of the SCSP Fee Program and update the fees to reflect the following types of changes:
• Changes in land use categories.
• Changes in development projections.
• Changes in backbone infrastructure and public facility requirements. • New cost estimates.
• New funding source data.
• Changes in cost allocation factors.
• Changes in the methodology for computing the SCSP fees.
Reviews and Accounting
Annual Review
This report and the technical information it contains should be maintained and reviewed periodically by the City as necessary to ensure the accuracy of the SCSP fee estimates and to enable the adequate programming of funding sources. To the extent that improvement requirements, costs, or development potential change over time, the SCSP Fee Program will need to be updated. As part of the process to document Fee Program changes, the City is required to review the Fee Program and report on its status annually. Specifically, AB 1600 (at Gov. C. §§ 66001(c), 66006(b)(1)) stipulates that each local agency that requires payment of a fee make specific information available to the public annually within 180 days of the last day of the fiscal year, including the follow items:
• A description of the type of fee in the account.
• The amount of the fee.
• The beginning and ending balance of the fund.
• The amount of fees collected and interest earned.
• Identification of the improvements constructed.
• The total cost of the improvements constructed.
• The fees expended to construct the improvement.
• The percent of total costs funded by the fee.
If sufficient fees have been collected to fund the construction of an improvement, the agency must specify the approximate date for construction of that improvement. Because of the dynamic nature of growth and infrastructure requirements, the City should monitor development activity, the need for infrastructure improvements, and the adequacy of the fee revenues and other available funding. Formal annual review of the SCSP Fee Program should occur, at which time necessary adjustments should be made to the Fee Program.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 54 Fee Program Implementation and Administration Five-Year Review
Fees will be collected from new development in the SCSP when a building permit is issued; however, use of these funds may need to wait until a sufficient fund balance can be accrued to fund improvements. According to Government Code Section 66006, the City is required to deposit, invest, account for, and expend the fees in a prescribed manner. The fifth fiscal year following the first deposit into the fee account or fund, and every 5 years thereafter, the City is required to make all of the following findings with respect to that portion of the account or fund remaining unexpended:
• Identify the purpose for which the fee is to be put.
• Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it is charged.
• Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing in incomplete improvements.
• Designate the approximate dates that the funding referred to above is expected to be deposited in the appropriate account or fund.
Once sufficient funds have been collected to complete the specified projects, the City must commence construction within 180 days. If it fails to do this, the City is required to refund the unexpended portion of the fee and any accrued interest to the then current owners.
Accessory Dwelling Units
Consistent with current State law, ADUs and Junior ADUs that are fewer than 750 building square feet shall not be assessed the Fee Program fees. Fees on ADUs larger than 750 square feet require a two-part calculation. First, the City will determine the total habitable building square footage of the proposed ADU and the primary residential unit on the lot on which the ADU is proposed. The City will determine the ADU building square footage as a proportion of the primary residential unit. As an example, if the primary residential dwelling unit is a low-density single-family unit with a habitable area of 2,000 building square feet, and the proposed ADU has a habitable area of 1,000 building square feet, then the ADU would be 50 percent of the primary residential unit. The City would then identify the Fee Program fees that will apply to the primary residential unit and apply 50 percent to that amount as the Fee Program fees applicable to the ADU. In this example, the Fee Program category is “Medium Single-Family 1,601 to2,400 sq. ft.” for Roadways and Trails fees and Low Density Residential for the other fee components.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 55 Fee Program Implementation and Administration Fee Program Credits and Reimbursements
Credit and Reimbursement Policies
Many of the major improvements, interchangeably referred to as facilities or improvements, included in the Fee Program CIP will be constructed privately by developers and dedicated to the City or other public agency. To create the necessary link between the collection of the SCSP fees from new development and the private construction of improvements, detailed credit and reimbursement procedures are incorporated into the SCSP Fee Program Ordinance. These credit and reimbursement procedures are necessary to ensure that the improvements are constructed and funded in compliance with the scheduling priorities established by the SCSP CIP. In addition, agreements between the City and developer that further outline the specifics of the credit and reimbursement requirements are required by the SCSP Fee Program Ordinance.
Amount of Credit/Reimbursement
The amounts to be considered for credit or reimbursement of the improvements constructed by private development will be the actual cost of constructing the improvement, including costs such as engineering design, design surveys, construction surveys, construction inspection and materials testing, and contingency, up to the estimated cost contained in the Fee Program CIP, as detailed in Appendix A. In the event that the fee rates and improvement costs are adjusted by either the built-in annual adjustments or periodic program updates, the maximum amount allowed for credit or reimbursement may be the cost set forth in the SCSP CIP in effect at the time of the project’s acceptance. Amounts for contingencies will be examined on a case-by- case basis and will be allowed based on the determination of the Community Development Director, or his/her designee.
At the time of the execution of the credit/reimbursement agreement, the eligible amount and allowable credits would be based on the estimated cost contained in the Fee Program CIP in effect at the time of the agreement. Upon acceptance of the improvement, the City will verify the actual cost of the project. If the project cost is less than the amount contained in the agreement, the difference in terms of credit will be applied to lower any remaining credits or be paid back to the City when no more credits are available. If there is reimbursement due to the developer, this difference will be adjusted to the reimbursement amount. If the project cost is more than the amount contained in the agreement and the cost in the Fee Program CIP in effect at the time of the project acceptance is greater than amount contained in the agreement due to annual adjustments to the CIP or periodic updates to the Fee Program, the difference between the amount contained in the agreement and the lesser of the project cost or the eligible amount in effect at the time of the project acceptance, may be applied to increase any future available credits or be reimbursed by the City to the developer in accordance with the reimbursement policy.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SUNCREEK SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 56 Fee Program Implementation and Administration Credit Requirements
To obtain credits, an application must be submitted to the City and a credit agreement must be entered into prior to issuance of any building permits for which a credit will be used. Credits shall be prorated over each unit in a residential subdivision and given after a security is posted for the complete performance of the construction project in a form that is acceptable to the City or after the facility is accepted by the City. Credits may be used against all fee components, with the exception of the off-site roads and administration fees. The credits will be applied to the total of all required SCSP fees excluding the off-site roads and administration fees, which must be paid in full at the time a building permit is issued.
Reimbursement Requirements
To obtain reimbursement, a reimbursement agreement is needed between the City and the developer. Reimbursement Agreements shall not be paid unless the improvement is completed and accepted by the City or other public agency.
Reimbursement agreements are an obligation of the SCSP Fee Program and are not an obligation of the City General Fund or any other fund of the City. Timing of reimbursements will be on a first-come-first-served basis based on the acceptance date of the improvement and the availability of funds in the applicable SCSP Fee Program Fund. Construction projects that the City is responsible for will take funding precedence over reimbursing developers.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Appendices
Appendix A: SCSP Fee Program Capital
Improvement Plan
Appendix B: Trails and Roadways Cost Allocation
Methodology
Appendix C: Cost Allocations
Appendix D: Preliminary Cost Estimate for SCSP
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
(prepared by MacKay & Somps)
Appendix E: Plan Area Fo rmation Costs and Funding
(prepared by SunCreek Owners’ Group)
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Appendix A: SCSP Fee Program Capital Improvement Plan
Table A-1. Plan Area Fee Road way Improvements Summary ...................................................................... A-1 Table A-2. Major On-site Roadways Construct ion Costs and Credits/Reimbursements ................. A-2 Table A-3. Major Off-site Roadways Construct ion Costs and Credits/Reimbursements ................ A-4 Table A-4. Potable Water Costs and Credits/Reimbursements .................................................................. A-5 Table A-5. Storm Drainage Costs and Credits/Reimbursements ................................................................ A-7 Table A-6. Wetland Mitigation for Backbo ne Infrastructure Cost Estimate .......................................... A-9 Table A-7. Trails Costs an d Credits/Reimbursements .................................................................................. A-10 Table A-8. Wetland Preserve Buffer Cost Estimate ...................................................................................... A-12 Table A-9. Constructi on Cost Adjustment ......................................................................................................... A-13 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
DRAFT
Table A-1
SunCreek Specific Plan Fee Nexus Study Update - 2026 Roadways Plan Area Fee Roadway Improvements Summary (2026$)
Item
Amoun
t
(2026$)
On-Site Roadway Improvements [1]
Traffic Signals
RD201 Rancho Cordova Parkway: Kiefer Boulevard to Southern Project Limit $671,067 RD301 Rancho Cordova Parkway: Central Park Drive to Kiefer Boulevard $671,067 RD101 Kiefer Boulevard: Sunrise Blvd to west of Rancho Cordova Pkwy $671,067 RD401 Kiefer Boulevard: Rancho Cordova Parkway to Americanos Boulevard $671,067 RD703 Americanos Boulevard: Central Park Drive to north of Central Park Drive $671,067 RD903 Chrysanthy Boulevard: Western Project Limit to Grant Line Rd. $671,067 RD102 Sunrise Boulevard: Kiefer Blvd. to Southern Project Limit $671,067 RD502 North Campus Road: Rancho Cordova Pkwy to east of West Park Drive $671,067 Subtotal Traffic Signals $5,368,536
Enhanced Medians
RD503 West Park Drive - North Campus Rd to Central Park Dr $599,397 RD504 Central Park Drive - Rancho Cordova Parkway to East of West Park Dr. $785,417 RD601 Central Park Drive - East of West Park Drive to Americanos Drive $407,472 Subtotal Enhanced Medians $1,792,286
Con-Span Drainage Crossings
SD604 Con-Span Drainage Crossing No. 4 $1,651,814
SD605 Con-Span Drainage Crossing No. 5 $1,389,727
Subtotal Con-Span Drainage Crossings $3,041,541
Total On-Site Roadway Improvements (Rounded) $10,202,400 Off-Site Roadway Improvements -- Reciprocal Funding Agreement (Rounded) [2] $2,217,900 Total Roadway Improvements (Rounded) $12,420,300
Source: City of Rancho Cordova; MacKay & Somps; EPS.
[1] See Table A-2.
[2] See Table A-3.
Prepared by EPS 3/22/2026 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\252000\252057 Suncreek Nexus Study Update\Models\252057 M2 3.18.26.xlsx A-1
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
DRAFT
Table A-2
SunCreek Specific Plan Fee Nexus Study Update - 2026
Major On-Site Roadways Construction Costs and Credits/Reimbursements Construction SunCreek Construction SunCreek Construction SunCreek Segment Construction TDIF Cost Net of Plan Area Net Construction TDIF Cost Net of Plan Area Net Construction TDIF Cost Net of Plan Area Net No. Improvement [2] Cost Credits [3] [4] TDIF Credits Fee [5] Cost [6] Cost Credits [3] [4] TDIF Credits Fee [5] Cost [6] Cost Credits [3] [4] TDIF Credits Fee [5] Cost [6] CCI Adjustment [7] 12.85% 12.85% 12.85% 10.12% 10.12% 10.12% Rancho Cordova Parkway
RD201 Rancho Cordova Parkway: Kiefer Boulevard to Southern Project Limit $4,662,300 ($1,212,776) $3,449,524 $540,000 $2,909,524 $5,261,410 ($1,368,619) $3,892,791 $609,391 $3,283,400 $5,793,914 ($1,507,136) $4,286,778 $671,067 $3,615,711 RD301 Rancho Cordova Parkway: Central Park Drive to Kiefer Boulevard $3,999,100 ($1,445,400) $2,553,700 $540,000 $2,013,700 $4,512,988 ($1,631,135) $2,881,853 $609,391 $2,272,462 $4,969,745 ($1,796,221) $3,173,524 $671,067 $2,502,457 RD501 Rancho Cordova Parkway: Northern Project Limit to Central Park Drive $5,970,350 ($2,372,936) $3,597,414 $0 $3,597,414 $6,737,546 ($2,677,861) $4,059,685 $0 $4,059,685 $7,419,449 ($2,948,886) $4,470,563 $0 $4,470,563 Total Rancho Cordova Parkway $14,631,750 ($5,031,112) $9,600,638 $1,080,000 $8,520,638 $16,511,944 ($5,677,615) $10,834,329 $1,218,782 $9,615,547 $18,183,108 ($6,252,243) $11,930,865 $1,342,134 $10,588,731 Kiefer Boulevard
RD101 Kiefer Boulevard: Sunrise Blvd to west of Rancho Cordova Pkwy $4,769,060 ($1,875,316) $2,893,744 $540,000 $2,353,744 $5,381,889 ($2,116,296) $3,265,593 $609,391 $2,656,202 $5,926,587 ($2,330,485) $3,596,102 $671,067 $2,925,035 RD202 Kiefer Boulevard: west of Rancho Cordova to Rancho Cordova $5,933,870 ($2,034,110) $3,899,760 $0 $3,899,760 $6,696,378 ($2,295,495) $4,400,883 $0 $4,400,883 $7,374,114 ($2,527,821) $4,846,293 $0 $4,846,293 RD401 Kiefer Boulevard: Rancho Cordova Parkway to Americanos Boulevard $6,904,500 ($1,462,000) $5,442,500 $540,000 $4,902,500 $7,791,735 ($1,649,868) $6,141,867 $609,391 $5,532,476 $8,580,332 ($1,816,850) $6,763,482 $671,067 $6,092,415 RD701 Kiefer Boulevard: Americanos Boulevard to Eastern Project Limit $3,355,920 ($1,081,116) $2,274,804 $0 $2,274,804 $3,787,159 ($1,220,040) $2,567,119 $0 $2,567,119 $4,170,455 ($1,343,519) $2,826,936 $0 $2,826,936 Total Kiefer Boulevard $20,963,350 ($6,452,542) $14,510,808 $1,080,000 $13,430,808 $23,657,161 ($7,281,699) $16,375,462 $1,218,782 $15,156,680 $26,051,488 ($8,018,675) $18,032,813 $1,342,134 $16,690,679 Americanos Boulevard
RD702 500-ft North of Kiefer Blvd to Central Park Dr $4,181,600 ($929,200) $3,252,400 $0 $3,252,400 $4,718,940 ($1,048,603) $3,670,337 $0 $3,670,337 $5,196,541 ($1,154,731) $4,041,810 $0 $4,041,810 RD703 Central Park Drive to north of Central Park Drive $1,370,800 ($178,600) $1,192,200 $540,000 $652,200 $1,546,949 ($201,550) $1,345,399 $609,391 $736,008 $1,703,515 ($221,949) $1,481,566 $671,067 $810,499 RD704 340-ft north of Central Park Dr to High School Access Rd $2,199,200 ($472,600) $1,726,600 $0 $1,726,600 $2,481,799 ($533,330) $1,948,469 $0 $1,948,469 $2,732,980 ($587,308) $2,145,672 $0 $2,145,672 RD801 High School Access Rd to North Campus Rd $4,718,930 ($1,319,390) $3,399,540 $0 $3,399,540 $5,325,317 ($1,488,933) $3,836,384 $0 $3,836,384 $5,864,289 ($1,639,627) $4,224,662 $0 $4,224,662 RD802 North Campus Rd to north of North Campus Rd $2,812,500 ($866,376) $1,946,124 $0 $1,946,124 $3,173,909 ($977,706) $2,196,203 $0 $2,196,203 $3,495,138 ($1,076,659) $2,418,479 $0 $2,418,479 RD901 Phase 9 Boundary to to 380-ft north of North Campus Rd $928,600 ($199,600) $729,000 $0 $729,000 $1,047,926 ($225,249) $822,677 $0 $822,677 $1,153,986 ($248,046) $905,940 $0 $905,940 RD902 North of North Campus Rd to Chrysanthy Blvd $3,162,400 ($960,876) $2,201,524 $0 $2,201,524 $3,568,771 ($1,084,349) $2,484,422 $0 $2,484,422 $3,929,964 ($1,194,095) $2,735,869 $0 $2,735,869 Total Americanos Boulevard $19,374,030 ($4,926,642) $14,447,388 $540,000 $13,907,388 $21,863,611 ($5,559,720) $16,303,891 $609,391 $15,694,500 $24,076,413 ($6,122,415) $17,953,998 $671,067 $17,282,931 Chrysanthy Boulevard
RD903 Western Project Limit to Grant Line Rd. $12,360,350 ($5,243,576) $7,116,774 $540,000 $6,576,774 $13,948,667 ($5,917,380) $8,031,287 $609,391 $7,421,896 $15,360,403 ($6,516,274) $8,844,129 $671,067 $8,173,062 Total Chrysanthy Boulevard $12,360,350 ($5,243,576) $7,116,774 $540,000 $6,576,774 $13,948,667 ($5,917,380) $8,031,287 $609,391 $7,421,896 $15,360,403 ($6,516,274) $8,844,129 $671,067 $8,173,062 Sunrise Boulevard
RD102 Kiefer Blvd. to Southern Project Limit $2,663,800 $0 $2,663,800 $540,000 $2,123,800 $3,006,101 $0 $3,006,101 $609,391 $2,396,710 $3,310,347 $0 $3,310,347 $671,067 $2,639,280 Total Sunrise Boulevard $2,663,800 $0 $2,663,800 $540,000 $2,123,800 $3,006,101 $0 $3,006,101 $609,391 $2,396,710 $3,310,347 $0 $3,310,347 $671,067 $2,639,280 North Campus Road
RD502 Rancho Cordova Pkwy to east of West Park Drive $6,664,800 ($1,602,900) $5,061,900 $540,000 $4,521,900 $7,521,233 ($1,808,874) $5,712,359 $609,391 $5,102,968 $8,282,452 ($1,991,949) $6,290,503 $671,067 $5,619,436 RD602 East of West Park to west of Americanos $2,708,118 ($657,612) $2,050,506 $0 $2,050,506 $3,056,114 ($742,116) $2,313,998 $0 $2,313,998 $3,365,421 ($817,225) $2,548,196 $0 $2,548,196 RD803 West of Americanos Drive to Americanos Drive $1,605,800 ($429,000) $1,176,800 $0 $1,176,800 $1,812,147 ($484,127) $1,328,020 $0 $1,328,020 $1,995,553 ($533,125) $1,462,428 $0 $1,462,428 Total North Campus Road $10,978,718 ($2,689,512) $8,289,206 $540,000 $7,749,206 $12,389,494 ($3,035,117) $9,354,377 $609,391 $8,744,986 $13,643,426 ($3,342,299) $10,301,127 $671,067 $9,630,060 West Park Drive [8]
RD503 North Campus Rd to Central Park Dr $4,631,400 $0 $4,631,400 $482,328 $4,149,072 $5,226,539 $0 $5,226,539 $544,308 $4,682,231 $5,755,514 $0 $5,755,514 $599,397 $5,156,117 Total West Park Drive $4,631,400 $0 $4,631,400 $482,328 $4,149,072 $5,226,539 $0 $5,226,539 $544,308 $4,682,231 $5,755,514 $0 $5,755,514 $599,397 $5,156,117 Central Park Drive [8]
RD504 Rancho Cordova Parkway to East of West Park Dr. $5,467,700 $0 $5,467,700 $632,016 $4,835,684 $6,170,305 $0 $6,170,305 $713,231 $5,457,074 $6,794,798 $0 $6,794,798 $785,417 $6,009,381 RD601 East of West Park Drive to Americanos Drive $2,942,300 $0 $2,942,300 $327,888 $2,614,412 $3,320,388 $0 $3,320,388 $370,022 $2,950,366 $3,656,442 $0 $3,656,442 $407,472 $3,248,970 Total Central Park Drive $8,410,000 $0 $8,410,000 $959,904 $7,450,096 $9,490,693 $0 $9,490,693 $1,083,253 $8,407,440 $10,451,240 $0 $10,451,240 $1,192,889 $9,258,351 Construction Costs (2020$) [1] Construction Costs (2022$) Construction Costs (2026$) On-Site
Roadways
Footnotes on next page
Prepared by EPS 5/21/2026 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\252000\252057 Suncreek Nexus Study Update\Models\252057 M1 NEW 5.7.26A-2 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
DRAFT
Table A-2
SunCreek Specific Plan Fee Nexus Study Update - 2026
Major On-Site Roadways Construction Costs and Credits/Reimbursements Construction SunCreek Construction SunCreek Construction SunCreek Segment Construction TDIF Cost Net of Plan Area Net Construction TDIF Cost Net of Plan Area Net Construction TDIF Cost Net of Plan Area Net No. Improvement [2] Cost Credits [3] [4] TDIF Credits Fee [5] Cost [6] Cost Credits [3] [4] TDIF Credits Fee [5] Cost [6] Cost Credits [3] [4] TDIF Credits Fee [5] Cost [6] CCI Adjustment [7] 12.85% 12.85% 12.85% 10.12% 10.12% 10.12% Construction Costs (2020$) [1] Construction Costs (2022$) Construction Costs (2026$) On-Site
Roadways
Con-Span Drainage Crossings Moved from Drainage Costs [9] SD403 Con-Span Drainage Crossing No. 3 $1,118,200 $0 $1,118,200 $0 $1,118,200 $1,118,200 $0 $1,118,200 $0 $1,118,200 $1,231,372 $0 $1,231,372 $0 $1,231,372 SD604 Con-Span Drainage Crossing No. 4 $1,701,100 $0 $1,701,100 $1,500,000 $201,100 $1,701,100 $0 $1,701,100 $1,500,000 $201,100 $1,873,267 $0 $1,873,267 $1,651,814 $221,453 SD605 Con-Span Drainage Crossing No. 5 $2,412,500 ($1,150,500) $1,262,000 $1,262,000 $0 $2,412,500 ($1,150,500) $1,262,000 $1,262,000 $0 $2,656,668 ($1,266,941) $1,389,727 $1,389,727 $0 Subtotal Con-Spans $5,231,800 ($1,150,500) $4,081,300 $2,762,000 $1,319,300 $5,231,800 ($1,150,500) $4,081,300 $2,762,000 $1,319,300 $5,761,307 ($1,266,941) $4,494,366 $3,041,541 $1,452,825 Total Major On-site Roads $99,245,198 ($25,493,884) $73,751,314 $8,524,232 $65,227,082 $111,326,010 ($28,622,031) $82,703,979 $9,264,689 $73,439,290 $122,593,246 ($31,518,847) $91,074,399 $10,202,363 $80,872,036 Source: City of Rancho Cordova; MacKay & Somps; EPS.
[1] From Preliminary Cost Estimate for SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure (MacKay & Somps, September 13, 2021). [2] The traffic signal locations are preliminary. Traffic signal locations will be verified by traffic analysis and warrants. [3] Pursuant to the provisions of the Public Facilities Finance Plan adopted with the Suncreek Specific Plan (SCSP) and the Development Agreements applicable to all properties in the SCSP, a set-aside of the Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF) was established at $9,000 per single family dwelling unit in 2013 as a dedicated funding source to fund certain core backbone roadways. As of January 1, 2026, the set-aside amount had inflated to $12,513.06 per single family dwelling unit, which amount would be collected at building permit and not available to be applied as credits at building permit. The creditable amount available to be applied at building permit in any given year shall be the difference between the current transportation impact fee and the current set-aside. [4] The credits shown on this table are for reference only. Actual credits will be determined through the City TDIF Program. [5] Major SunCreek roadway improvements that are funded by the SunCreek Plan Area Fee. Includes construction cost and 35% for contingency and soft costs. [6] Net costs consist of road frontage and con-span costs to be funded by private developers and costs for improvements included in the City TDIF Program that exceed the estimated TDIF Program cost. It is anticipated that the City TDIF Program will be updated to reflect updated costs and that the developers will receive full TDIF fee credits for TDIF Program improvements they construct. [7] See Table A-9.
[8] SunCreek Plan Area Fee Program amounts are for enhanced medians. These amounts are not reflected as being in the SunCreek Plan Area Fee Program in the MacKay & Somps Cost Estimate in Appendix C.
Enhanced median calculations (2020$) shown below:
Linear Feet Cost per LF
Subtotal
Cost
Contin./
Soft Costs Total
35%
West Park Drive - RD503 2,030 $176 $357,280 $125,048 $482,328 Central Park Drive - RD504 2,660 $176 $468,160 $163,856 $632,016 Central Park Drive - RD601 1,380 $176 $242,880 $85,008 $327,888 [9] Shown in MacKay & Somps Cost Estimate in Appendix C as Drainage Costs. Moved to Road Costs for the purposes of establishing the fees. Amounts in 2022 dollars are based on cost estimates provided to MacKay & Somps from Contech Engineered Solutions (9/ and are not adjusted by the CCI Adjustment factor.
Prepared by EPS 5/21/2026 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\252000\252057 Suncreek Nexus Study Update\Models\252057 M1 NEW 5.7.26A-3 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
DRAFT
Table A-3
SunCreek Specific Plan Fee Nexus Study Update - 2026
Major Off-Site Roadways Construction Costs and Credits/Reimbursements Segment Construction TDIF SunCreek Construction TDIF SunCreek Construction TDIF SunCreek No. Improvement Cost Credits [2] Plan Area Fee Cost Credits [2] Plan Area Fee Cost Credits [2] Plan Area Fee CCI Adjustment [3] 12.85% 12.85% 10.12% 10.12%
Rancho Cordova Pkwy.
RW100 Rancho Cordova Parkway: Chrysanthy Blvd to Douglas Blvd $2,682,500 ($2,682,500) $0 $3,027,204 ($3,027,204) $0 $3,333,585 ($3,333,585) $0 Kiefer Blvd.
RW101 Kiefer Boulevard: Eastern Project Limit to Grant Line Rd $4,954,800 ($4,954,800) $0 $5,591,497 ($5,591,497) $0 $6,157,409 ($6,157,409) $0 Jackson Road/Grant Line Road Intersection
RW102 Jackson Road/Grant Line Road Intersection $893,500 ($893,500) $0 $1,008,316 ($1,008,316) $0 $1,110,367 ($1,110,367) $0 Reciprocal Funding Agreement [4] $1,784,700 $0 $1,784,700 $2,014,036 $0 $2,014,036 $2,217,875 $0 $2,217,875 Total Major Off-site Roads $10,315,500 ($8,530,800) $1,784,700 $11,641,053 ($9,627,017) $2,014,036 $12,819,236 ($10,601,361) $2,217,875 Source: City of Rancho Cordova; MacKay & Somps; EPS.
[1] From Preliminary Cost Estimate for SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure (MacKay & Somps, September 13, 2021). [2] Reflects improvements to be funded through City TDIF Program. [3]
See Table A-9.
[4] Reciprocal Funding total (2020$) provided by Mark Thomas via email, 5/23/19. Reflects SCSP obligation for off-site improvements to be constructed by the County.
Construction Costs (2020$) [1] Construction Costs (2022$) Construction Costs (2026$) Off-Site
Roadways
Prepared by EPS 3/22/2026 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\252000\252057 Suncreek Nexus Study Update\Models\252057 M2 3.18.26.xlsx A-4
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
DRAFT
Table A-4
SunCreek Specific Plan Fee Nexus Study Update - 2026
Potable Water Costs and Credits/Reimbursements
SCWA Zone 40 SunCreek SCWA Zone 40 SunCreek SCWA Zone 40 SunCreek SCWA Zone 40 SunCreek Segment Construction Fee Program Plan Area Fee Construction Fee Program Plan Area Fee Construction Fee Program Plan Area Fee Construction Fee Program Plan Area Fee No. Improvement Cost Credits/Reimb. [2] Funding Cost Credits/Reimb. Funding Cost Credits/Reimb. [2] Funding Cost Credits/Reimb. [2] Funding CCI Adjustment [3] 12.85% 12.85% 12.85% 7.62% 7.62% 7.62% Local Systems
Local - Low Pressure Systems
WM101 16" Water System: Sunrise Blvd $668,350 ($460,057) $208,293 $754,234 ($519,175) $235,059 $811,704 ($558,734) $252,970 $0 $0 $0 WM201 24" Water System: Rancho Cordova Pkwy $1,160,600 ($691,579) $469,021 $1,309,738 ($780,448) $529,290 $1,409,535 ($839,915) $569,620 $0 $0 $0 WM401 16" Water System: Kiefer Blvd $995,350 ($680,141) $315,209 $1,123,253 ($767,540) $355,713 $1,208,840 ($826,023) $382,817 $0 $0 $0 WM402 24" Water System: Central Park Dr $611,400 ($336,090) $275,310 $689,965 ($379,278) $310,687 $742,538 ($408,177) $334,361 $0 $0 $0 WM403 24" Water System: Central Park Dr $330,450 ($182,625) $147,825 $372,913 ($206,092) $166,821 $401,327 ($221,795) $179,532 $0 $0 $0 WM501 24" Water System: Central Park Dr $888,300 ($487,100) $401,200 $1,002,447 ($549,693) $452,754 $1,078,829 ($591,577) $487,252 $0 $0 $0 WM502 12" & 24" Water System: West Park Dr $407,600 ($124,205) $283,395 $459,977 ($140,165) $319,812 $495,025 ($150,845) $344,180 $0 $0 $0 WM503 18" Water System: North Campus Rd $387,260 ($260,332) $126,928 $437,023 ($293,785) $143,238 $470,322 ($316,170) $154,152 $0 $0 $0 WM504 18" Water System: North Campus Rd $492,460 ($330,436) $162,024 $555,742 ($372,897) $182,845 $598,087 ($401,310) $196,777 $0 $0 $0 WM505 24" Water System: Park $298,500 ($177,116) $121,384 $336,858 ($199,876) $136,982 $362,525 ($215,106) $147,419 $0 $0 $0 WM601 18" Water System: North Campus Rd $405,050 ($271,107) $133,943 $457,099 ($305,945) $151,154 $491,928 ($329,257) $162,671 $0 $0 $0 WM701 24" Water System: Kiefer Blvd $454,450 ($273,318) $181,132 $512,847 ($308,440) $204,407 $551,924 ($331,942) $219,982 $0 $0 $0 WM702 24" Water System: Americanos Blvd $999,550 ($592,094) $407,456 $1,127,993 ($668,179) $459,814 $1,213,942 ($719,092) $494,850 $0 $0 $0 WM703 24" Water System: Americanos Blvd $178,100 ($105,593) $72,507 $200,986 ($119,162) $81,824 $216,300 ($128,242) $88,058 $0 $0 $0 WM704 24" Water System: Americanos Blvd $304,700 ($180,170) $124,530 $343,854 ($203,322) $140,532 $370,054 ($218,814) $151,240 $0 $0 $0 WM801 24" Water System: Americanos Blvd $647,070 ($383,566) $263,504 $730,219 ($432,855) $297,364 $785,859 ($465,837) $320,022 $0 $0 $0 WM802 24" Water System: Americanos Blvd $585,750 ($346,738) $239,012 $661,019 ($391,294) $269,725 $711,386 ($421,109) $290,277 $0 $0 $0 WM803 18" Water System: North Campus Rd $418,730 ($281,303) $137,427 $472,537 ($317,451) $155,086 $508,542 ($341,639) $166,903 $0 $0 $0 WM901 24" Water System: Chrysanthy Blvd $603,700 ($361,926) $241,774 $681,276 ($408,434) $272,842 $733,187 ($439,555) $293,632 $0 $0 $0 WM902 24" Water System: Chrysanthy Blvd $96,650 ($57,821) $38,829 $109,070 ($65,251) $43,819 $117,381 ($70,223) $47,158 $0 $0 $0 WM906 24" Water System: Americanos Blvd $51,050 ($34,728) $16,322 $57,610 ($39,191) $18,419 $62,000 ($42,177) $19,823 $0 $0 $0 WM907 24" Water System: Americanos Blvd $850,300 ($503,486) $346,814 $959,564 ($568,184) $391,380 $1,032,679 ($611,477) $421,202 ($1,032,679) $611,477 ($421,202) Subtotal Low Pressure $11,835,370 ($7,121,531) $4,713,839 $13,356,224 ($8,036,657) $5,319,567 $14,373,914 ($8,649,016) $5,724,898 ($1,032,679) $611,477 ($421,202) Local - High Pressure Systems
WM904 16" Water System: Chrysanthy Blvd $938,450 ($641,051) $297,399 $1,059,042 ($723,427) $335,615 $1,139,737 ($778,549) $361,188 ($1,139,737) $778,549 ($361,188) Subtotal High Pressure $938,450 ($641,051) $297,399 $1,059,042 ($723,427) $335,615 $1,139,737 ($778,549) $361,188 ($1,139,737) $778,549 ($361,188) Subtotal Local System $12,773,820 ($7,762,582) $5,011,238 $14,415,266 ($8,760,084) $5,655,182 $15,513,651 ($9,427,565) $6,086,086 ($2,172,416) $1,390,026 ($782,390) Regional Systems
WM506 Sunrise Douglas 2: Booster Pump Station $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 WM903 20" Water System: Chrysanthy Blvd $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 WM905 24" Water System: Grant Line Rd $813,750 ($486,131) $327,619 $918,318 ($548,599) $369,719 $988,290 ($590,400) $397,890 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal Regional Systems $813,750 ($486,131) $327,619 $918,318 ($548,599) $369,719 $988,290 ($778,549) $361,188 $0 $0 $0 Total Potable Water $13,587,570 ($8,248,713) $5,338,857 $15,333,584 ($9,308,683) $6,024,901 $16,501,941 ($10,206,114) $6,447,274 ($2,172,416) $1,390,026 ($782,390) Source: City of Rancho Cordova; MacKay & Somps; EPS.
[1] From Preliminary Cost Estimate for SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure (MacKay & Somps, September 13, 2021). [2] The credits shown on this table are for reference only. Actual credits will be determined through the SCWA Zone 40 Impact Fee Program. [3] See Table A-9.
Construction Costs (2020$) [1] Construction Costs (2022$) Construction Costs (2024$) Less Costs Expended (2024$) Potable
Water
Prepared by EPS 3/22/2026 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\252000\252057 Suncreek Nexus Study Update\Models\252057 M2 3.18.26.xlsx A-5
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
DRAFT
Table A-4
SunCreek Specific Plan Fee Nexus Study Update - 2026
Potable Water Costs and Credits/Reimbursements
SCWA Zone 40 SunCreek SCWA Zone 40 SunCreek
Segment Construction Fee Program Plan Area Fee Remaining Plus Cost Fee Program Plan Area Fee No. Improvement Cost Credits/Reimb. [2] Funding Cost Expended Total Credits/Reimb. [2] Funding CCI Adjustment [3] 2.32% 2.32%
Local Systems
Local - Low Pressure Systems
WM101 16" Water System: Sunrise Blvd $811,704 ($558,734) $252,970 $830,570 $0 $830,570 ($571,720) $258,850 WM201 24" Water System: Rancho Cordova Pkwy $1,409,535 ($839,915) $569,620 $1,442,296 $0 $1,442,296 ($859,437) $582,859 WM401 16" Water System: Kiefer Blvd $1,208,840 ($826,023) $382,817 $1,236,936 $0 $1,236,936 ($845,222) $391,714 WM402 24" Water System: Central Park Dr $742,538 ($408,177) $334,361 $759,796 $0 $759,796 ($417,664) $342,132 WM403 24" Water System: Central Park Dr $401,327 ($221,795) $179,532 $410,655 $0 $410,655 ($226,950) $183,705 WM501 24" Water System: Central Park Dr $1,078,829 ($591,577) $487,252 $1,103,904 $0 $1,103,904 ($605,327) $498,577 WM502 12" & 24" Water System: West Park Dr $495,025 ($150,845) $344,180 $506,531 $0 $506,531 ($154,351) $352,180 WM503 18" Water System: North Campus Rd $470,322 ($316,170) $154,152 $481,253 $0 $481,253 ($323,519) $157,734 WM504 18" Water System: North Campus Rd $598,087 ($401,310) $196,777 $611,988 $0 $611,988 ($410,637) $201,351 WM505 24" Water System: Park $362,525 ($215,106) $147,419 $370,951 $0 $370,951 ($220,106) $150,845 WM601 18" Water System: North Campus Rd $491,928 ($329,257) $162,671 $503,362 $0 $503,362 ($336,910) $166,452 WM701 24" Water System: Kiefer Blvd $551,924 ($331,942) $219,982 $564,752 $0 $564,752 ($339,657) $225,095 WM702 24" Water System: Americanos Blvd $1,213,942 ($719,092) $494,850 $1,242,157 $0 $1,242,157 ($735,805) $506,352 WM703 24" Water System: Americanos Blvd $216,300 ($128,242) $88,058 $221,327 $0 $221,327 ($131,223) $90,104 WM704 24" Water System: Americanos Blvd $370,054 ($218,814) $151,240 $378,655 $0 $378,655 ($223,900) $154,755 WM801 24" Water System: Americanos Blvd $785,859 ($465,837) $320,022 $804,124 $0 $804,124 ($476,664) $327,460 WM802 24" Water System: Americanos Blvd $711,386 ($421,109) $290,277 $727,920 $0 $727,920 ($430,897) $297,023 WM803 18" Water System: North Campus Rd $508,542 ($341,639) $166,903 $520,362 $0 $520,362 ($349,580) $170,782 WM901 24" Water System: Chrysanthy Blvd $733,187 ($439,555) $293,632 $750,228 $0 $750,228 ($449,771) $300,457 WM902 24" Water System: Chrysanthy Blvd $117,381 ($70,223) $47,158 $120,109 $0 $120,109 ($71,855) $48,254 WM906 24" Water System: Americanos Blvd $62,000 ($42,177) $19,823 $63,441 $0 $63,441 ($43,157) $20,284 WM907 24" Water System: Americanos Blvd $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,032,679 $1,032,679 ($611,477) $421,202 Subtotal Low Pressure $13,341,235 ($8,037,539) $5,303,696 $13,651,317 $1,032,679 $14,683,996 ($8,835,829) $5,848,167 Local - High Pressure Systems
WM904 16" Water System: Chrysanthy Blvd $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,139,737 $1,139,737 ($778,549) $361,188 Subtotal High Pressure $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,139,737 $1,139,737 ($778,549) $361,188 Subtotal Local System $13,341,235 ($8,037,539) $5,303,696 $13,651,317 $2,172,416 $15,823,733 ($9,614,378) $6,209,355 Regional Systems
WM506 Sunrise Douglas 2: Booster Pump Station $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 WM903 20" Water System: Chrysanthy Blvd $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 WM905 24" Water System: Grant Line Rd $988,290 ($590,400) $397,890 $1,011,260 $0 $1,011,260 ($604,122) $407,138 Subtotal Regional Systems $988,290 ($590,400) $397,890 $1,011,260 $0 $1,011,260 ($604,122) $407,138 Total Potable Water $14,329,525 ($8,627,939) $5,701,586 $14,662,577 $2,172,416 $16,834,993 ($10,218,500) $6,616,493 Source: City of Rancho Cordova; MacKay & Somps; EPS.
[1] From Preliminary Cost Estimate for SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure (MacKay & Somps, September 13, 2021). [2] The credits shown on this table are for reference only. Actual credits will be determined through the SCWA Zone 40 Impact Fee Program. [3] See Table A-9.
Total Construction Cost
Potable
Water
Suncreek Plan Area Fee Costs (2026$)Remaining Costs (2024$) Prepared by EPS 3/22/2026 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\252000\252057 Suncreek Nexus Study Update\Models\252057 M2 3.18.26.xlsx A-6
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
DRAFT
Table A-5
SunCreek Specific Plan Fee Nexus Study Update - 2026
Storm Drainage Costs and Credits/Reimbursements
Storm Drainage Storm Drainage SunCreek Storm Drainage SunCreek Storm Drainage SunCreek Segment Construction Impact Fee Construction Impact Fee Plan Area Construction Impact Fee Plan Area Construction Impact Fee Plan Area No. Improvement Cost Credits/Reimb. [3] Total Cost Credits/Reimb. [3] Fee Funding Cost Credits/Reimb. [3] Fee Funding Cost Credits/Reimb. [3] Fee Funding CCI Adjustment [4] 12.85% 12.85% 12.85% 7.62% 7.62% 7.62% Pipeline System
SD101 Kiefer to DB No. 9 drainage 4% $622,900 ($206,282) $416,618 $24,916 ($8,251) $16,665 $28,118 ($9,312) $18,806 $30,260 ($10,021) $20,239 SD103 Sunrise & Kiefer untreated drainage system & culverts 100% $1,595,075 ($851,923) $743,152 $1,595,075 ($851,923) $743,152 $1,800,044 ($961,396) $838,648 $1,937,200 ($1,034,650) $902,550 SD104 Kiefer Box Culvert Extension3 100% $151,200 ($26,400) $124,800 $151,200 ($26,400) $124,800 $170,629 ($29,792) $140,837 $183,631 ($32,062) $151,568 SD201 Kiefer Blvd to DB No. 8 drainage system & Con-Spans 5% $2,225,200 ($135,170) $2,090,030 $111,260 ($6,759) $104,501 $125,557 ($7,627) $117,930 $135,124 ($8,208) $126,916 SD301 Rancho Cordova Pkwy to DB No. 6 drainage system 25% $149,100 $0 $149,100 $37,275 $0 $37,275 $42,065 $0 $42,065 $45,270 $0 $45,270 SD302 Investek North drainage system 25% $84,350 $0 $84,350 $21,088 $0 $21,088 $23,797 $0 $23,797 $25,611 $0 $25,611 SD304 Rancho Cordova untreated drainage system 25% $695,650 ($324,096) $371,554 $173,913 ($81,024) $92,888 $196,260 ($91,436) $104,825 $211,215 ($98,403) $112,812 SD305 Rancho Cordova drainage culvert3 100% $151,200 ($26,400) $124,800 $151,200 ($26,400) $124,800 $170,629 ($29,792) $140,837 $183,631 ($32,062) $151,568 SD402 Investek South drainage system 7% $849,300 ($292,930) $556,370 $59,451 ($20,505) $38,946 $67,091 ($23,140) $43,951 $72,203 ($24,903) $47,299 SD403 Con-Span Drainage Crossing No. 3 7% $1,118,200 $0 $1,118,200 $78,274 $0 $78,274 $78,274 $0 $78,274 $84,238 $0 $84,238 SD502 West Park Dr to DB No. 5 drainage system 7% $123,375 ($55,770) $67,605 $8,636 ($3,904) $4,732 $9,746 ($4,406) $5,340 $10,489 ($4,741) $5,747 SD503 Rancho Cordova Pkwy untreated drainage system 100% $573,450 ($266,849.94) $306,600 $573,450 ($266,850) $306,600 $647,139 ($301,140) $345,998 $696,448 ($324,086) $372,362 SD601 North Campus to DB No. 4 drainage system 7% $460,450 ($118,505.02) $341,945 $32,232 ($8,295) $23,936 $36,373 ($9,361) $27,012 $39,145 ($10,075) $29,070 SD603 School Access Road untreated drainage system 100% $443,500 ($176,058) $267,442 $443,500 ($176,058) $267,442 $500,490 ($198,682) $301,808 $538,626 ($213,821) $324,805 SD604 Con-Span Drainage Crossing No. 4 100% $1,701,100 $0 $1,701,100 $1,701,100 $0 $1,701,100 $1,701,100 $0 $1,701,100 $1,830,717 $0 $1,830,717 SD605 Con-Span Drainage Crossing No. 5 100% $2,412,500 ($1,150,500) $1,262,000 $2,412,500 ($1,150,500) $1,262,000 $2,412,500 ($1,150,500) $1,262,000 $2,596,323 ($1,238,163) $1,358,159 SD701 Americanos Blvd to DB No. 3 drainage system 10% $106,850 ($34,803) $72,047 $10,685 ($3,480) $7,205 $12,058 ($3,928) $8,130 $12,977 ($4,227) $8,750 SD802 Americanos Blvd drainage system 10% $297,800 ($122,184) $175,616 $29,780 ($12,218) $17,562 $33,607 ($13,788) $19,818 $36,167 ($14,839) $21,328 SD803 Americanos Blvd untreated drainage system 100% $300,400 ($123,076) $177,324 $300,400 ($123,076) $177,324 $339,002 ($138,891) $200,111 $364,832 ($149,474) $215,358 SD901 Grant Line 220 untreated drainage system 100% $1,121,900 ($479,909) $641,991 $1,121,900 ($479,909) $641,991 $1,266,065 ($541,578) $724,487 $1,362,534 ($582,844) $779,690 SD902 Grant Line 220 drainage system 10% $590,400 ($245,982) $344,418 $59,040 ($24,598) $34,442 $66,627 ($27,759) $38,868 $71,703 ($29,874) $41,829 SD903 Grant Line 220 drainage system 6% $373,250 ($123,483) $249,767 $22,395 ($7,409) $14,986 $25,273 ($8,361) $16,912 $27,198 ($8,998) $18,200 Subtotal Pipeline System (Rounded) $16,147,150 ($4,760,321) $11,386,829 $9,119,269 ($3,277,560) $5,841,709 $9,752,444 ($3,550,889) $6,201,555 $10,495,541 ($3,821,452) $6,674,088 Detention, Water Quality, and Hydro-Modification Basins SD102 SunCreek Basin No. 9 4% $694,430 ($291,377) $403,053 $27,777 ($11,655) $16,122 $31,347 ($13,153) $18,194 $33,735 ($14,155) $19,580 SD202 SunCreek Basin No. 8 5% $757,880 ($291,625) $466,255 $37,894 ($14,581) $23,313 $42,763 ($16,455) $26,308 $46,022 ($17,709) $28,313 SD303 SunCreek Basin No. 6 25% $777,080 ($262,742) $514,338 $194,270 ($65,686) $128,584 $219,234 ($74,126) $145,108 $235,939 ($79,774) $156,164 SD401 SunCreek Basin No. 7 7% $613,530 ($280,417) $333,113 $42,947 ($19,629) $23,318 $48,466 ($22,152) $26,314 $52,159 ($23,839) $28,319 SD501 SunCreek Basin No. 5 7% $857,280 ($335,334) $521,946 $60,010 ($23,473) $36,536 $67,721 ($26,490) $41,231 $72,881 ($28,508) $44,373 SD602 SunCreek Basin No. 4 7% $778,380 ($250,888) $527,492 $54,487 ($17,562) $36,924 $61,488 ($19,819) $41,669 $66,173 ($21,329) $44,844 SD702 SunCreek Basin No. 3 10% $868,680 ($371,272) $497,408 $86,868 ($37,127) $49,741 $98,031 ($41,898) $56,132 $105,500 ($45,091) $60,410 SD801 SunCreek Basin No. 2 10% $846,780 ($395,892) $450,888 $84,678 ($39,589) $45,089 $95,559 ($44,676) $50,883 $102,840 ($48,081) $54,760 SD904 SunCreek Basin No. 1 6% $783,630 ($364,285) $419,345 $47,018 ($21,857) $25,161 $53,060 ($24,666) $28,394 $57,103 ($26,545) $30,557 Subtotal Det. / WQ / H-M Basins (Raw Construction Cost) $6,977,670 ($2,843,832) $4,133,838 $635,948 ($251,160) $384,788 $717,668 ($283,434) $434,234 $772,352 ($305,031) $467,321 Contingency (20%) $1,395,534 $0 $1,395,534 $127,200 $0 $127,200 $143,534 $0 $143,534 $154,470 $0 $154,470 Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (15%) $1,046,651 $0 $1,046,651 $95,400 $0 $95,400 $107,650 $0 $107,650 $115,853 $0 $115,853 Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (8%) $0 ($227,500) $0 $0 ($20,100) ($20,100) $0 ($22,675) ($22,675) $0 ($24,402) ($24,402) Subtotal Det. / WQ / H-M Basins $9,419,855 ($3,071,332) $6,576,023 $858,548 ($271,260) $587,288 $968,852 ($306,109) $662,743 $1,042,675 ($329,433) $713,242 Less Con-Spans Moved to Roadway Improvements [5]
SD403 Con-Span Drainage Crossing No. 3 7% ($1,118,200) $0 ($1,118,200) ($78,274) $0 ($78,274) ($78,274) $0 ($78,274) ($84,238) $0 ($84,238) SD604 Con-Span Drainage Crossing No. 4 100% ($1,701,100) $0 ($1,701,100) ($1,701,100) $0 ($1,701,100) ($1,701,100) $0 ($1,701,100) ($1,830,717) $0 ($1,830,717) SD605 Con-Span Drainage Crossing No. 5 100% ($2,412,500) $1,150,500 ($1,262,000) ($2,412,500) $1,150,500 ($1,262,000) ($2,412,500) $1,150,500 ($1,262,000) ($2,596,323) $1,238,163 ($1,358,159) Subtotal Con-Span Adjustments ($5,231,800) $1,150,500 ($4,081,300) ($4,191,874) $1,150,500 ($3,041,374) ($4,191,874) $1,150,500 ($3,041,374) ($4,511,278) $1,238,163 ($3,273,115) Total Storm Drainage Facilities [6] 17% $20,335,205 ($6,681,153) $13,881,552 $5,785,943 ($2,398,320) $3,387,623 $6,529,422 ($2,706,498) $3,822,924 $7,026,938 ($2,912,722) $4,114,215 Source: City of Rancho Cordova; MacKay & Somps; EPS.
[1] From Preliminary Cost Estimate for SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure (MacKay & Somps, September 13, 2021). [2] The Storm Drainage system has been sized to serve both backbone roadway drainage and onsite drainage. In order to capture only the drainage system cost incurred by backbone roadway improvements, the cost of the drainage system has been prorated by a ratio of the total backbone road area relative to the total shed area served by the system. The remaining cost will be treated as an intract cost paid for the developer. [3] The credits shown on this table are for reference only. Actual credits will be determined through the City Storm Drainage Impact Fee Program. [4] See Table A-9.
[5] Shown in MacKay & Somps Cost Estimate in Appendix C as Drainage Costs. Moved to Road Costs for the purposes of establishing the fees. Plan Area fee costs adjusteed in Road Costs table. See Table A-2.
MacKay & Somps estimates for Con-Spans from September 2021, so no inflation adjustment is made in 2022. [6] The total cost of all identified storm drainage facilities in 2026 dollars is approximately $25.2 million (calculated as SCSP cost in 2026 dollars divided by SCSP percentage of total costs: $4.2 million/17%).
SunCreek
Fee Pct. [2]
SunCreek Cost (2020$) SunCreek Cost (2024$)SunCreek Cost (2022$) Storm
Drainage
Total Cost (2020$) [1]
Prepared by EPS 5/21/2026 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\252000\252057 Suncreek Nexus Study Update\Models\252057 M1 NEW 5.7.26A-7 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
DRAFT
Table A-5
SunCreek Specific Plan Fee Nexus Study Update - 2026
Storm Drainage Costs and Credits/Reimbursements
Storm Drainage SunCreek Storm Drainage SunCreek Storm Drainage SunCreek Segment Construction Impact Fee Plan Area Construction Impact Fee Plan Area Remaining Plus Cost Impact Fee Plan Area No. Improvement Cost Credits/Reimb. [3] Fee Funding Cost Credits/Reimb. [3] Fee Funding Cost Expended Total Credits/Reimb. [3] Fee Funding CCI Adjustment [4] 2.32% 2.32% 2.32%
Pipeline System
SD101 Kiefer to DB No. 9 drainage 4% $0 $0 $0 $30,260 ($10,021) $20,239 $30,964 $0 $30,964 ($10,254) $20,710 SD103 Sunrise & Kiefer untreated drainage system & culverts 100% $0 $0 $0 $1,937,200 ($1,034,650) $902,550 $1,982,225 $0 $1,982,225 ($1,058,698) $923,527 SD104 Kiefer Box Culvert Extension3 100% $0 $0 $0 $183,631 ($32,062) $151,568 $187,899 $0 $187,899 ($32,808) $155,091 SD201 Kiefer Blvd to DB No. 8 drainage system & Con-Spans 5% $0 $0 $0 $135,124 ($8,208) $126,916 $138,265 $0 $138,265 ($8,399) $129,866 SD301 Rancho Cordova Pkwy to DB No. 6 drainage system 25% $0 $0 $0 $45,270 $0 $45,270 $46,322 $0 $46,322 $0 $46,322 SD302 Investek North drainage system 25% $0 $0 $0 $25,611 $0 $25,611 $26,206 $0 $26,206 $0 $26,206 SD304 Rancho Cordova untreated drainage system 25% $0 $0 $0 $211,215 ($98,403) $112,812 $216,124 $0 $216,124 ($100,690) $115,434 SD305 Rancho Cordova drainage culvert3 100% $0 $0 $0 $183,631 ($32,062) $151,568 $187,899 $0 $187,899 ($32,808) $155,091 SD402 Investek South drainage system 7% $0 $0 $0 $72,203 ($24,903) $47,299 $73,881 $0 $73,881 ($25,482) $48,399 SD403 Con-Span Drainage Crossing No. 3 7% $0 $0 $0 $84,238 $0 $84,238 $86,196 $0 $86,196 $0 $86,196 SD502 West Park Dr to DB No. 5 drainage system 7% $0 $0 $0 $10,489 ($4,741) $5,747 $10,732 $0 $10,732 ($4,851) $5,881 SD503 Rancho Cordova Pkwy untreated drainage system 100% $0 $0 $0 $696,448 ($324,086) $372,362 $712,635 $0 $712,635 ($331,619) $381,017 SD601 North Campus to DB No. 4 drainage system 7% $0 $0 $0 $39,145 ($10,075) $29,070 $40,055 $0 $40,055 ($10,309) $29,746 SD603 School Access Road untreated drainage system 100% $0 $0 $0 $538,626 ($213,821) $324,805 $551,144 $0 $551,144 ($218,791) $332,354 SD604 Con-Span Drainage Crossing No. 4 100% $0 $0 $0 $1,830,717 $0 $1,830,717 $1,873,267 $0 $1,873,267 $0 $1,873,267 SD605 Con-Span Drainage Crossing No. 5 100% $0 $0 $0 $2,596,323 ($1,238,163) $1,358,159 $2,656,668 $0 $2,656,668 ($1,266,941) $1,389,726 SD701 Americanos Blvd to DB No. 3 drainage system 10% $0 $0 $0 $12,977 ($4,227) $8,750 $13,278 $0 $13,278 ($4,325) $8,953 SD802 Americanos Blvd drainage system 10% ($36,167) $14,839 ($21,328) $0 $0 $0 $0 $36,167 $36,167 ($14,839) $21,328 SD803 Americanos Blvd untreated drainage system 100% ($364,832) $149,474 ($215,358) $0 $0 $0 $0 $364,832 $364,832 ($149,474) $215,358 SD901 Grant Line 220 untreated drainage system 100% ($1,362,534) $582,844 ($779,690) $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,362,534 $1,362,534 ($582,844) $779,690 SD902 Grant Line 220 drainage system 10% ($71,703) $29,874 ($41,829) $0 $0 $0 $0 $71,703 $71,703 ($29,874) $41,829 SD903 Grant Line 220 drainage system 6% ($27,198) $8,998 ($18,200) $0 $0 $0 $0 $27,198 $27,198 ($8,998) $18,200 Subtotal Pipeline System (Rounded) ($1,862,436) $786,029 ($1,076,407) $8,633,105 ($3,035,423) $5,597,682 $8,833,759 $1,862,436 $10,696,195 ($3,892,003) $6,804,192 Detention, Water Quality, and Hydro-Modification Basins SD102 SunCreek Basin No. 9 4% $0 $0 $0 $33,735 ($14,155) $19,580 $34,519 $0 $34,519 ($14,484) $20,035 SD202 SunCreek Basin No. 8 5% $0 $0 $0 $46,022 ($17,709) $28,313 $47,091 $0 $47,091 ($18,120) $28,971 SD303 SunCreek Basin No. 6 25% $0 $0 $0 $235,939 ($79,774) $156,164 $241,422 $0 $241,422 ($81,628) $159,794 SD401 SunCreek Basin No. 7 7% $0 $0 $0 $52,159 ($23,839) $28,319 $53,371 $0 $53,371 ($24,394) $28,978 SD501 SunCreek Basin No. 5 7% $0 $0 $0 $72,881 ($28,508) $44,373 $74,575 $0 $74,575 ($29,171) $45,404 SD602 SunCreek Basin No. 4 7% $0 $0 $0 $66,173 ($21,329) $44,844 $67,711 $0 $67,711 ($21,825) $45,887 SD702 SunCreek Basin No. 3 10% $0 $0 $0 $105,500 ($45,091) $60,410 $107,952 $0 $107,952 ($46,139) $61,814 SD801 SunCreek Basin No. 2 10% ($102,840) $48,081 ($54,760) $0 $0 $0 $0 $102,840 $102,840 ($48,081) $54,760 SD904 SunCreek Basin No. 1 6% $0 $0 $0 $57,103 ($26,545) $30,557 $58,430 $0 $58,430 ($27,162) $31,268 Subtotal Det. / WQ / H-M Basins (Raw Construction Cost) ($102,840) $48,081 ($54,760) $669,511 ($256,950) $412,561 $685,072 $102,840 $787,913 ($311,003) $476,910 Contingency (20%) ($20,568) $0 ($20,568) $133,902 $0 $133,902 $137,014 $20,568 $157,582 $0 $157,582 Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (15%) ($15,426) $0 ($15,426) $100,427 $0 $100,427 $102,761 $15,426 $118,187 $0 $118,187 Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (8%) $0 $0 $0 $0 ($20,556) ($20,556) $0 $0 $0 ($21,034) ($21,034) Subtotal Det. / WQ / H-M Basins ($138,834) $48,081 ($90,754) $903,840 ($277,506) $626,334 $924,847 $138,834 $1,063,682 ($332,037) $731,645 Less Con-Spans Moved to Roadway Improvements [3]
SD403 Con-Span Drainage Crossing No. 3 7% $0 $0 $0 ($84,238) $0 ($84,238) ($86,196) $0 ($86,196) $0 ($86,196) SD604 Con-Span Drainage Crossing No. 4 100% $0 $0 $0 ($1,830,717) $0 ($1,830,717) ($1,873,267) $0 ($1,873,267) $0 ($1,873,267) SD605 Con-Span Drainage Crossing No. 5 100% $0 $0 $0 ($2,596,323) $1,238,163 ($1,358,159) ($2,656,668) $0 ($2,656,668) $1,266,941 ($1,389,726) Subtotal Con-Span Adjustments $0 $0 $0 ($4,511,278) $1,238,163 ($3,273,115) ($4,616,131) $0 ($4,616,131) $1,266,941 ($3,349,190) Total Storm Drainage Facilities [6] ($2,001,270) $834,110 ($1,167,161) $5,025,667 ($2,074,766) $2,950,901 $5,142,475 $2,001,270 $7,143,746 ($2,957,099) $4,186,647 Source: City of Rancho Cordova; MacKay & Somps; EPS.
[1] From Preliminary Cost Estimate for SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure (MacKay & Somps, September 13, 2021). [2] The Storm Drainage system has been sized to serve both backbone roadway drainage and onsite drainage. In order to capture only the drainage system cost incurred by backbone roadway improvements, the cost of the drainage system has been prorated by a ratio of the total backbone road area relative to the total shed area served by the system. The remaining cost will be treated as an intract cost paid for the developer. [3] The credits shown on this table are for reference only. Actual credits will be determined through the City Storm Drainage Impact Fee Program. [4] See Table A-9.
[5] Shown in MacKay & Somps Cost Estimate in Appendix C as Drainage Costs. Moved to Road Costs for the purposes of establishing the fees. Plan Area fee costs adjusteed in Road Costs table. See Table A-2.
MacKay & Somps estimates for Con-Spans from September 2021, so no inflation adjustment is made in 2022. [6] The total cost of all identified storm drainage facilities in 2026 dollars is approximately $25.2 million (calculated as SCSP cost in 2026 dollars divided by SCSP percentage of total costs: $4.2 million/17%).
Less SunCreek Cost Expended (2024$) Remaining SunCreek Cost (2024$) Suncreek Cost (2026$) SunCreek
Fee Pct. [1]
Total Construction Cost
Storm
Drainage
Prepared by EPS 5/21/2026 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\252000\252057 Suncreek Nexus Study Update\Models\252057 M1 NEW 5.7.26A-8 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
DRAFT
Table A-6
SunCreek Specific Plan Fee Nexus Study Update - 2026
Wetland Mitigation for Backbone Infrastructure Cost Estimate Segment No. Improvement
Cost
(2020$)
Total
Cost
Less Cost
Expended Net Cost
Total
Cost
Less Cost
Expended Net Cost Net Cost
Plus Cost
Expended
Total
Cost
CCI Adjustment [2] 12.85% 7.62% 2.32%
WM101 Wetland Mitigation for Segment 1-3 $538,370 $607,551 $0 $607,551 $653,844 $0 $653,844 $669,041 $0 $669,041 WM201 Wetland Mitigation for Segment 5 & 6 $575,817 $649,810 $0 $649,810 $699,323 $0 $699,323 $715,577 $0 $715,577 WM202 Wetland Mitigation for Segment 4 $196,890 $222,191 $0 $222,191 $239,121 $0 $239,121 $244,678 $0 $244,678 WM301 Wetland Mitigation for Segment 20 $107,137 $120,904 $0 $120,904 $130,117 $0 $130,117 $133,141 $0 $133,141 WM302 Wetland Mitigation for Segment 7A & 7B $194,588 $219,593 $0 $219,593 $236,325 $0 $236,325 $241,818 $0 $241,818 WM401 Wetland Mitigation for Segment 9A $397,829 $448,950 $0 $448,950 $483,159 $0 $483,159 $494,388 $0 $494,388 WM402 Wetland Mitigation for Segment 19 $440,310 $496,890 $0 $496,890 $534,751 $0 $534,751 $547,180 $0 $547,180 WM403 Wetland Mitigation for Segment 11B $109,774 $123,880 $0 $123,880 $133,319 $0 $133,319 $136,418 $0 $136,418 WM501 Wetland Mitigation for Segment 11A $526,509 $594,166 $0 $594,166 $639,439 $0 $639,439 $654,301 $0 $654,301 WM502 Wetland Mitigation for Segment 8 $195,504 $220,626 $0 $220,626 $237,437 $0 $237,437 $242,956 $0 $242,956 WM503 Wetland Mitigation for Segment 13 $119,428 $134,775 $0 $134,775 $145,044 $0 $145,044 $148,415 $0 $148,415 WM504 Wetland Mitigation for Segment 12 $410,353 $463,084 $0 $463,084 $498,369 $0 $498,369 $509,952 $0 $509,952 WM701 Wetland Mitigation for Segment 9B $113,725 $128,339 $0 $128,339 $138,118 $0 $138,118 $141,328 $0 $141,328 WM702 Wetland Mitigation for Segment 10 $446,118 $503,445 $0 $503,445 $541,805 $0 $541,805 $554,398 $0 $554,398 WM801 Wetland Mitigation for Segment 21B $470,050 $530,452 $0 $530,452 $570,870 $0 $570,870 $584,139 $0 $584,139 WM802 Wetland Mitigation for Segment 21A $315,833 $356,418 $0 $356,418 $383,575 ($134,251) $249,324 $255,119 $134,251 $389,370 WM803 Wetland Mitigation for Segment 14 $377,236 $425,711 $0 $425,711 $458,149 $0 $458,149 $468,797 $0 $468,797 WM901 Wetland Mitigation for Segment 15-17 $776,501 $876,282 ($876,282) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $876,282 $876,282 WM902 Wetland Mitigation for Segment 18 $85,822 $96,850 ($96,850) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $96,850 $96,850 Total Wetland Mitigation for Backbone Infrastructure $6,397,794 $7,219,917 ($973,132) $6,246,784 $6,722,764 ($134,251) $6,588,513 $6,741,646 $1,107,384 $7,849,029 Source: MacKay & Somps (September 2021); ECORP Consulting; EPS. [1] From Preliminary Cost Estimate for SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure (MacKay & Somps, September 13, 2021). [2] See Table A-9.
Remaining Cost (2022$) [1] Remaining Cost (2024$) SunCreek Plan Area Fee Costs (2026$) Wetland Mitigation
for Backbone
Infrastructure
Prepared by EPS 3/22/2026 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\252000\252057 Suncreek Nexus Study Update\Models\252057 M2 3.18.26.xlsx A-9
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
DRAFT
Table A-7
SunCreek Specific Plan Fee Nexus Study Update - 2026
Trails Costs and Credits/Reimbursements
Segment No. Improvement Total Cost
TDIF
Credits [2] Net Cost Total Cost
TDIF
Credits [2] Net Cost Total Cost
TDIF
Credits [2] Net Cost
CCI Adjustment [3] 12.85% 12.85% 7.62% 7.62%
TR101 10' Secondary Trail: Kiefer Boulevard $168,500 $0 $168,500 $190,152 $0 $190,152 $204,641 $0 $204,641 TR102 10' Secondary Trail $399,760 $0 $399,760 $451,130 $0 $451,130 $485,504 $0 $485,504 TR103 Pedestrian/Bike At-Grade Crossing #1 [4] $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TR201 12' Primary & 10' Secondary Trail: Kiefer Boulevard $383,620 $0 $383,620 $432,916 $0 $432,916 $465,902 $0 $465,902 TR202 12' Primary Trail $207,150 $0 $207,150 $233,769 $0 $233,769 $251,581 $0 $251,581 TR203 Pedestrian/Bike Grade Separated Crossing #2 [5] [6] $4,098,700 ($4,098,700) $0 $4,625,387 ($4,625,387) $0 $4,977,823 ($4,977,823) $0 TR204 Pedestrian/Bike Grade Separated Crossing #2 [5] [6] $4,098,700 ($4,098,700) $0 $4,625,387 ($4,625,387) $0 $4,977,823 ($4,977,823) $0 TR205 10' Secondary Trail $79,060 $0 $79,060 $89,219 $0 $89,219 $96,017 $0 $96,017 TR301 10' Secondary Trail $103,020 $0 $103,020 $116,258 $0 $116,258 $125,117 $0 $125,117 TR401 12' Primary Trail $305,150 $0 $305,150 $344,362 $0 $344,362 $370,601 $0 $370,601 TR402 Pedestrian/Bike At-Grade Crossing #3 $58,100 $0 $58,100 $65,566 $0 $65,566 $70,562 $0 $70,562 TR501 10' Secondary Trail $167,240 $0 $167,240 $188,730 $0 $188,730 $203,111 $0 $203,111 TR502 10' Secondary Trail: West Park Drive $125,720 $0 $125,720 $141,875 $0 $141,875 $152,685 $0 $152,685 TR503 10' Secondary Trail: Central Park Drive $44,040 $0 $44,040 $49,699 $0 $49,699 $53,486 $0 $53,486 TR504 Pedestrian/Bike At-Grade Crossing #4 $58,100 $0 $58,100 $65,566 $0 $65,566 $70,562 $0 $70,562 TR601 10' Secondary Trail: Central Park Drive $40,740 $0 $40,740 $45,975 $0 $45,975 $49,478 $0 $49,478 TR602 12' Primary Trail: Central Park to Americanos $81,700 $0 $81,700 $92,199 $0 $92,199 $99,224 $0 $99,224 TR603 12' Primary Trail: Americanos Blvd. $60,150 $0 $60,150 $67,879 $0 $67,879 $73,051 $0 $73,051 TR604 10' Secondary Trail $31,140 $0 $31,140 $35,142 $0 $35,142 $37,819 $0 $37,819 TR605 Pedestrian/Bike At-Grade Crossing #5 $58,100 $0 $58,100 $65,566 $0 $65,566 $70,562 $0 $70,562 TR606 Pedestrian/Bike At-Grade Crossing #6 [7] $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TR701 10' Secondary Trail $475,620 $0 $475,620 $536,738 $0 $536,738 $577,635 $0 $577,635 TR801 12' Primary Trail: Americanos Blvd. $164,050 $0 $164,050 $185,131 $0 $185,131 $199,237 $0 $199,237 TR802 12' Primary Trail $118,800 $0 $118,800 $134,066 $0 $134,066 $144,281 $0 $144,281 TR803 12' Primary Trail: Americanos Blvd. $41,600 $0 $41,600 $46,946 $0 $46,946 $50,523 $0 $50,523 TR804 Pedestrian/Bike Grade Separated Crossing #7 [6] $3,856,500 ($3,856,500) $0 $4,352,064 ($4,352,064) $0 $4,683,674 ($4,683,674) $0 TR805 Pedestrian/Bike Grade Separated Crossing #8 [6] $2,226,900 ($2,226,900) $0 $2,513,059 ($2,513,059) $0 $2,704,544 ($2,704,544) $0 TR901 12' Primary Trail: Americanos Blvd. $23,700 $0 $23,700 $26,745 $0 $26,745 $28,783 $0 $28,783 TR902 12' Primary Trail $141,100 $0 $141,100 $159,231 $0 $159,231 $171,364 $0 $171,364 TR903 Pedestrian/Bike Grade Separated Crossing #9 [6] $2,070,900 ($2,070,900) $0 $2,337,013 ($2,337,013) $0 $2,515,084 ($2,515,084) $0 Total Trails and Pedestrian/Bike Crossings $19,687,860 ($16,351,700) $3,336,160 $22,217,769 ($18,452,909) $3,764,860 $23,910,674 ($19,858,947) $4,051,727 Source: City of Rancho Cordova; MacKay & Somps; EPS.
[1] From Preliminary Cost Estimate for SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure (MacKay & Somps, September 13, 2021). [2] The credits shown on this table are for reference only. Actual credits will be determined through the City TDIF Program. [3] See Table A-9.
[4]
Improvement cost for pedestrian at-grade crossing is captured in the Kiefer Blvd roadway improvement cost. [5] Grade separated crossings are reimbursed through the City TDIF Program. [6] To be determined if both of these grade separated crossings will be included improvements. [7] Improvement cost for pedestrian at-grade crossing is captured in the Americano's Blvd roadway improvement cost.
Construction Costs (2020$) [1] Construction Costs (2022$) Construction Costs (2024$) Trails
Prepared by EPS 5/8/2026 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\252000\252057 Suncreek Nexus Study Update\Models\252057 M1 NEW 5.7.26.xlsxA-10 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
DRAFT
Table A-7
SunCreek Specific Plan Fee Nexus Study Update - 2026
Trails Costs and Credits/Reimbursements
Segment No. Improvement Total Cost
TDIF
Credits [2] Net Cost Total Cost
TDIF
Credits [2] Net Cost
Remaining
Cost
Plus Cost
Expended Total
TDIF
Credits [2]
SCSP Fee
Funded
CCI Adjustment [3] 2.32% 2.32%
TR101 10' Secondary Trail: Kiefer Boulevard $0 $0 $0 $204,641 $0 $204,641 $209,398 $0 $209,398 $0 $209,398 TR102 10' Secondary Trail $0 $0 $0 $485,504 $0 $485,504 $496,788 $0 $496,788 $0 $496,788 TR103 Pedestrian/Bike At-Grade Crossing #1 [4] $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TR201 12' Primary & 10' Secondary Trail: Kiefer Boulevard $0 $0 $0 $465,902 $0 $465,902 $476,731 $0 $476,731 $0 $476,731 TR202 12' Primary Trail $0 $0 $0 $251,581 $0 $251,581 $257,429 $0 $257,429 $0 $257,429 TR203 Pedestrian/Bike Grade Separated Crossing #2 [5] [6] $0 $0 $0 $4,977,823 ($4,977,823) $0 $5,093,519 $0 $5,093,519 ($5,093,519) $0 TR204 Pedestrian/Bike Grade Separated Crossing #2 [5] [6] $0 $0 $0 $4,977,823 ($4,977,823) $0 $5,093,519 $0 $5,093,519 ($5,093,519) $0 TR205 10' Secondary Trail $0 $0 $0 $96,017 $0 $96,017 $98,249 $0 $98,249 $0 $98,249 TR301 10' Secondary Trail $0 $0 $0 $125,117 $0 $125,117 $128,025 $0 $128,025 $0 $128,025 TR401 12' Primary Trail $0 $0 $0 $370,601 $0 $370,601 $379,215 $0 $379,215 $0 $379,215 TR402 Pedestrian/Bike At-Grade Crossing #3 $0 $0 $0 $70,562 $0 $70,562 $72,202 $0 $72,202 $0 $72,202 TR501 10' Secondary Trail $0 $0 $0 $203,111 $0 $203,111 $207,832 $0 $207,832 $0 $207,832 TR502 10' Secondary Trail: West Park Drive $0 $0 $0 $152,685 $0 $152,685 $156,234 $0 $156,234 $0 $156,234 TR503 10' Secondary Trail: Central Park Drive $0 $0 $0 $53,486 $0 $53,486 $54,729 $0 $54,729 $0 $54,729 TR504 Pedestrian/Bike At-Grade Crossing #4 $0 $0 $0 $70,562 $0 $70,562 $72,202 $0 $72,202 $0 $72,202 TR601 10' Secondary Trail: Central Park Drive $0 $0 $0 $49,478 $0 $49,478 $50,628 $0 $50,628 $0 $50,628 TR602 12' Primary Trail: Central Park to Americanos $0 $0 $0 $99,224 $0 $99,224 $101,530 $0 $101,530 $0 $101,530 TR603 12' Primary Trail: Americanos Blvd. $0 $0 $0 $73,051 $0 $73,051 $74,749 $0 $74,749 $0 $74,749 TR604 10' Secondary Trail $0 $0 $0 $37,819 $0 $37,819 $38,698 $0 $38,698 $0 $38,698 TR605 Pedestrian/Bike At-Grade Crossing #5 $0 $0 $0 $70,562 $0 $70,562 $72,202 $0 $72,202 $0 $72,202 TR606 Pedestrian/Bike At-Grade Crossing #6 [7] $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TR701 10' Secondary Trail $0 $0 $0 $577,635 $0 $577,635 $591,061 $0 $591,061 $0 $591,061 TR801 12' Primary Trail: Americanos Blvd. $0 $0 $0 $199,237 $0 $199,237 $203,868 $0 $203,868 $0 $203,868 TR802 12' Primary Trail $0 $0 $0 $144,281 $0 $144,281 $147,635 $0 $147,635 $0 $147,635 TR803 12' Primary Trail: Americanos Blvd. $0 $0 $0 $50,523 $0 $50,523 $51,697 $0 $51,697 $0 $51,697 TR804 Pedestrian/Bike Grade Separated Crossing #7 [6] $0 $0 $0 $4,683,674 ($4,683,674) $0 $4,792,534 $0 $4,792,534 ($4,792,534) $0 TR805 Pedestrian/Bike Grade Separated Crossing #8 [6] $0 $0 $0 $2,704,544 ($2,704,544) $0 $2,767,404 $0 $2,767,404 ($2,767,404) $0 TR901 12' Primary Trail: Americanos Blvd. ($28,783) $0 ($28,783) $0 $0 $0 $0 $28,783 $28,783 $0 $28,783 TR902 12' Primary Trail ($171,364) $0 ($171,364) $0 $0 $0 $0 $171,364 $171,364 $0 $171,364 TR903 Pedestrian/Bike Grade Separated Crossing #9 [6] $0 $0 $0 $2,515,084 ($2,515,084) $0 $2,573,540 $0 $2,573,540 ($2,573,540) $0 Total Trails and Pedestrian/Bike Crossings ($200,148) $0 ($200,148) $23,710,526 ($19,858,947) $3,851,579 $24,261,616 $200,148 $24,461,763 ($20,320,516) $4,141,247 Source: City of Rancho Cordova; MacKay & Somps; EPS.
[1] From Preliminary Cost Estimate for SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure (MacKay & Somps, September 13, 2021). [2] The credits shown on this table are for reference only. Actual credits will be determined through the City TDIF Program. [3]
See Table A-9.
[4] Improvement cost for pedestrian at-grade crossing is captured in the Kiefer Blvd roadway improvement cost. [5] Grade separated crossings are reimbursed through the City TDIF Program. [6] To be determined if both of these grade separated crossings will be included improvements. [7] Improvement cost for pedestrian at-grade crossing is captured in the Americano's Blvd roadway improvement cost.
Total Construction Cost
SunCreek Plan Area Fee Costs (2026$)
Trails
Less Costs Expended (2024$) Remaining Construction Costs (2024$) Prepared by EPS 5/8/2026 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\252000\252057 Suncreek Nexus Study Update\Models\252057 M1 NEW 5.7.26.xlsxA-11 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
DRAFT
Table A-8
SunCreek Specific Plan Fee Nexus Study Update - 2026
Wetland Preserve Buffer Cost Estimate
Segment No. Improvemen
t 2020$ [1] 2022$ 2026$
CCI Adjustment [2] 12.85% 10.12%
WB101 Wetland Buffer: Shalako West $84,800 $95,697 $105,382 WB102 Wetland Buffer: Shalako West $132,100 $149,075 $164,163 WB201 Wetland Buffer: Shalako East $187,400 $211,481 $232,885 WB301 Wetland Buffer: Investek North $178,800 $201,776 $222,198 WB401 Wetland Buffer: Investek South $271,100 $305,937 $336,900 WB501 Wetland Buffer: Callahan $183,600 $207,193 $228,163 WB601 Wetland Buffer: Smith-Dunmore $122,600 $138,354 $152,357 WB701 Wetland Buffer: Sierra Sunrise South $131,200 $148,059 $163,044 WB702 Wetland Buffer: Sierra Sunrise South $23,200 $26,181 $28,831 WB801 Wetland Buffer: Sierra Sunrise North $149,900 $169,162 $186,283 WB802 Wetland Buffer: Sierra Sunrise North $83,700 $94,456 $104,015 Total Wetland Preserve Buffer $1,548,400 $1,747,371 $1,924,221 Source: City of Rancho Cordova; MacKay & Somps; EPS.
[1] From Preliminary Cost Estimate for SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure (MacKay & Somps, September 13, 2021).
[2] See Table A-9.
Wetland
Preserve
Buffer
Cost
Prepared by EPS 3/22/2026 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\252000\252057 Suncreek Nexus Study Update\Models\252057 M2 3.18.26.xlsx A-12
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
DRAFT
Table A-9
SunCreek Specific Plan Fee Nexus Study Update - 2026
Construction Cost Adjustment
Item Oct-19 Oct-21 Oct-22 Oct-23 Oct-24 Oct-25
Cost Year 2020 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
20-City CCI 11,326.10 12,464.00 13,174.92 13,497.97 13,632.34 14,073.99 San Francisco CCI 12,524.93 14,451.91 15,141.40 15,473.38 15,385.40 15,559.78 Average CCI 11,925.52 13,457.96 14,158.16 14,485.68 14,508.87 14,816.89 Percentage Change [1] 12.85% 5.20% 2.30% 0.20% 2.12%
Cumulative Percentage Change from Oct. 2021 5.20% 7.62% 7.83% 10.12% Cumulative Percentage Change from Oct. 2023 0.20% 2.32% Source: Engineering-News Record
[1] Percentage used to escalate the MacKay & Somps cost estimates from 2020$ to 2022$ and each year thereafter.
Amounts for 2022 through 2025 rounded to nearest tenth of a percentage point and 2026 amount rounded to nearest hundred of a percentage point to be consistent with City fee update and credit calculations.
ENR Construction Cost Index
Prepared by EPS 3/22/2026 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\252000\252057 Suncreek Nexus Study Update\Models\252057 M2 3.18.26.xlsx A-13
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Appendix B: Trails and Roadways Cost Allocation
Methodology
Trails and Roadways Cost Allocation Methodology Narrative ........................................................................ B-1 Table B-1. Residential PPH and VMT Allocation Factors Summary .......................................................... B-7 Table B-2. Residential Unit s and Population Summary ................................................................................... B-8 Table B-3. Persons per Household (PPH) and Trips per Ho usehold (TPH) Factors ............................ B-9 Table B-4. Single-Family and Multifamil y PPH and VMT Allocation Factors...................................... B-10 Table B-5. Roadways VMT ....................................................................................................... ................................. B-11 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Trails and Roadways
Cost Allocation Methodology
California Assembly Bill 602 (AB 602), enacted in 2021, modified the Mitigation Fee Act to require that a jurisdiction calculate residential development impact fees proportionately to the square footage of the dwelling units with several exceptions. This requirement applies to the following two fee components in the SunCreek Specific Plan Area (SCSP) Fee Program update:
• Trails
• Roadways
The SCSP is located in the City of Rancho Cordova (City). To comply with AB 602 in the SCSP Fee Program update, the City proposes to establish trails and roadways residential fees by the square foot ranges that were established for the road fee adopted by the Sacramento Transportation Authority in 2024, also referred to as the Sacramento County Transportation Mitigation Fee (SCTMF). The square foot ranges apply to both single- family and multifamily units and are summarized below:
• Very Small (≥800 sq. ft.)
• Small (801-1,200 sq. ft.)
• Medium-Small (1,201-1,600 sq. ft.)
• Medium (1,601-2,400 sq. ft.)
• Large (>2,400 sq. ft.)
The purpose of this appendix is to detail the data and methodology used to develop the cost allocation factors by residential land use and square foot range for the SCSP trails and roadways fee components. Household population is the driver of trails demand and trail improvements required to serve new residential development. Thus, EPS developed estimated persons per household (PPH) allocation factors for each building square foot range to use in allocating the trails costs and calculating trails fees. Daily vehicle miles travelled (VMT), which combines daily trips per household and trip length, is the driver of roadway improvements needed to serve new residential development. Thus, EPS developed estimated VMT factors for each residential land use and building square foot range to use in allocating the roadways costs and calculating roadways fees.
Table B-1 summarizes the PPH and VMT residential allocation factors. The methodology for calculating the PPH and VMT factors by square foot fee range is detailed in the remainder of this appendix.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SunCreek Specific Plan Persons per Household and Trips per Household Page B-2
Persons Per Household (PPH) Allocation Factors
Tables B-2 through B-5 detail the calculation of the PPH allocation factors by square foot range for use in the trails fee calculation. Note that Tables B-2 through B-5 also detail the calculation of the VMT allocation factors by square foot range for use in the roadways fee calculation, which will be discussed separately following the discussion of the PPH allocation factors.
The following steps are required to calculate the PPH allocation factors by square foot range:
1. Calculate the projected total SunCreek population at buildout using City PPH values for residential units.
Table B-2 shows the PPH and total population calculation for both single-family and multifamily units, In total, the City estimates that the SCSP will have a population of 11,642 residents at buildout. The City categorizes residential units as low density, medium density, compact density, and high density and has established the following PPH factors by unit type, as codified in the Rancho Cordova Municipal Code Chapter
22.40 Park and Recreation Dedication and Fees.
• Low Density: 2.95 PPH
• Medium Density: 2.95 PPH
• Compact Density: 2.03 PPH
• High Density: 1.54 PPH
For the purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that low density, medium density, and compact density units are single-family, while high density units are multifamily. This assumption results in an average single-family PPH of 2.87, while the average multifamily PPH is equivalent to the high density PPH of 1.54. The total population at buildout is estimated by applying the PPH factors to the estimated buildout dwelling units in the SCSP.
2. Estimate single-family and multifamily PPH adjustment factors for the square foot fee ranges to be used in the trails fee calculation.
Table B-3 details the calculation of the initial PPH adjustment factors for each of the square foot ranges summarized at the beginning of this appendix. The PPH adjustment factors in Table B-3 are calculated separately for single-family and multifamily units.
For each square foot range, the PPH adjustment factor is set to 1.0 for the average size unit, which is assumed to be a medium unit for single-family development and a small unit for multifamily development. The factors for all other single-family or multifamily square foot ranges are scaled up or down from the average size unit. The steps to calculate the PPH adjustment factors are summarized below:
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
Page B-3
a) Compile 2023 US Census Bureau American Housing Survey (AHS) data on number of households by number of persons per household for different unit sizes and summarize by the square foot ranges listed above. This process results in PPH values for each square foot range.
b) For each single-family square foot range, estimate the PPH adjustment factor as the PPH for the range divided by the PPH for a single-family medium unit (the average size single-family unit). Likewise, for each multifamily square foot range, estimate the PPH adjustment factor as the PPH for the range divided by the PPH for a multifamily small unit (the average size multifamily unit). Note that for multifamily units, fees are established for each of the square foot ranges listed above, but the three largest square foot ranges are combined and will have the same fees.
3. Calculate single-family and multifamily PPH allocation factors by square foot range for use in the trails fee cost allocation.
Table B-4 details the calculation of the PPH allocation factors. All PPH allocation factors are based on a comparison to a single-family medium size unit. The steps are required to calculate the single-family and multifamily PPH allocation factors. a) For each single-family and multifamily square foot range, calculate the PPH as detailed in Table B-4. This calculation uses the PPH adjustment factors from step 2, the unit distributions provided by the City, and the average single-family and multifamily PPH from Table B-2.
b) For each single-family and multifamily square foot range, calculate the PPH allocation factor as the PPH divided by the PPH for a single-family medium unit.
4. For each single-family and multifamily square foot range, calculate the population and sum to arrive at the total SCSP population. Note that this step is unnecessary to develop the cost allocation factors and is only included to verify the population calculations using the PPH by square foot range.
Table B-4 details the total population calculation. For each square foot range, the population is estimated as the PPH from the previous step multiplied by the number of units (based on the percentage distribution provided by the City). These population values are summed to arrive at the total SCSP population. This calculation results in a total population that is equal to the total population from Table B-2, where population is calculated using average PPH values by unit type rather than by square foot range.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SunCreek Specific Plan Persons per Household and Trips per Household Page B-4
5. Calculate PPH allocation factors for age-restricted single-family and age-restricted multifamily units.
Table B-1 shows the calculation of the PPH allocation factors for the age-restricted units. These allocation factors are estimated as follows:
a) Estimate the average PPH for age-restricted single-family and age-restricted multifamily units.
b) For age-restricted single-family units, express the average PPH as a percentage of the PPH for a medium (average size) single-family unrestricted unit. Likewise, for age-restricted multifamily units, express the average PPH as a percentage of the PPH for a small (average size) multifamily unrestricted unit. c) For each age-restricted single-family range, calculate the PPH allocation factor as the single-family percentage from step b) multiplied by the PPH allocation factor for unrestricted single-family units in the same range. Likewise, for each age- restricted multifamily range, calculate the PPH allocation factor as the multifamily percentage from step 5b) multiplied by the average PPH allocation factor for unrestricted multifamily units in the same range.
Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Allocation Factors
Tables B-3 through B-5 detail the calculation of the VMT allocation factors by square foot range for use in the roadways fee calculation.
The following steps are required to calculate the VMT allocation factors by square foot range:
1. Estimate single-family and multifamily trips per household (TPH) adjustment factors for the square foot fee ranges to be used in the roadways fee calculation.
Table B-3 details the calculation of the initial TPH adjustment factors for each of the square foot ranges summarized at the beginning of this memorandum. The TPH adjustment factors in Table B-3 are calculated separately for single-family and multifamily units. For each square foot range, the TPH adjustment factor is set to 1.0 for the average size unit, which is assumed to be a medium unit for single-family development and a small unit for multifamily development. The factors for all other single-family or multifamily square foot ranges are scaled up or down from the average size unit. The steps to calculate the TPH adjustment factors are summarized below:
a) Estimate TPH values for each single-family and multifamily square foot range using AHS data (described in step 2 of the Persons Per Household Factors section of this appendix) and 2022 National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) data on daily trips per household by number of people per household.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
Page B-5
b) For each single-family square foot range, estimate the TPH adjustment factor as the TPH for the range divided by the TPH for a single-family medium unit (the average size single-family unit). Likewise, for each multifamily square foot range, estimate the TPH adjustment factor as the TPH for the range divided by the TPH for a multifamily small unit (the average size multifamily unit). Note that for multifamily units, fees are established for each of the five square foot ranges, but the three largest square foot ranges are combined and will have the same fees.
2. Calculate single-family and multifamily VMT allocation factors by square foot range for use in the roadways fee cost allocation.
Table B-4 details the calculation of the VMT allocation factors. All VMT allocation factors are based on a comparison to a single-family medium size unit. The steps below are required to calculate the single-family and multifamily VMT allocation factors. a) Calculate the daily VMT per unit for each single-family and multifamily square foot range, as detailed in Table B-4. This calculation uses the TPH adjustment factors from step 1, the unit distributions provided by the City, and the average single- family and multifamily daily VMT.
Table B-5 details the calculation of the average daily VMT values using average daily trips per unit obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual [ITE Manual], 11
th Edition) and trip lengths and percent of new
trips obtained from the 2021 Rancho Cordova TDIF Program Nexus Study. b) For each single-family and multifamily range, calculate the VMT allocation factor as the VMT divided by the VMT for a single-family medium unit.
3. Calculate VMT allocation factors for age-restricted single-family and age-restricted multifamily units.
Table B-1 summarizes the calculation of the VMT allocation factors for the age- restricted units. These allocation factors are estimated as follows:
a) Estimate the average daily VMT for age-restricted single-family and age-restricted multifamily units. As detailed in Table B-5, the calculation of the VMT values use average daily trips per unit obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual [ITE Manual], 11th Edition) and trip lengths and percent of new trips obtained from the 2021 Rancho Cordova TDIF Program Nexus Study.
b) For age-restricted single-family units, express the average daily VMT as a percentage of the VMT for a medium (average size) single-family unrestricted unit.
Likewise, for age-restricted multifamily units, express the average daily VMT as a percentage of the VMT for a small (average size) multifamily unrestricted unit.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SunCreek Specific Plan Persons per Household and Trips per Household Page B-6
c) For each age-restricted single-family range, calculate the VMT allocation factor as the single-family percentage from step 3b) multiplied by the VMT allocation factor for unrestricted single-family units in the same range. Likewise, for each age- restricted multifamily range, calculate the VMT allocation factor as the multifamily percentage from step 3b) multiplied by the average VMT allocation factor for unrestricted multifamily units in the same range.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
DRAFTTable B-1
SunCreek Specific Plan Fee Nexus Study Update - 2026
Residential PPH and VMT Allocation Factors Summary
Item
Single-
Family
Age-Restricted
Single-Family Multifamily
Age-Restricted
Multifamily
Single
Family
Age-Restricted
Single-Family Multifamily
Age-Restricted
Multifamily
Formula A A*65% B B*81% C C*47% D D*49%
Average Size Unit
Average Size Unit Medium Medium Small Small Medium Medium Small Small PPH [1] 2.79 1.80 1.49 1.20
VMT [2] 47.21 21.98 33.74 16.52
Age-Restricted Pct. [3] 65% 81% 47% 49%
Residential [4]
Very Small (≤800 sq. ft.) [5] 0.73 0.47 0.41 0.36 0.81 0.38 0.63 0.31 Small (801-1,200 sq. ft.) 0.88 0.57 0.53 0.43 0.91 0.42 0.71 0.35 Medium-Small (1,201-1,600 sq. ft.) 0.92 0.59 0.59 0.47 0.94 0.44 0.75 0.37 Medium (1,601-2,400 sq. ft.) 1.00 0.65 0.59 0.47 1.00 0.47 0.75 0.37 Large (>2,400 sq. ft.) 1.10 0.71 0.59 0.47 1.07 0.50 0.75 0.37 [1] See Table B-4 for single family and multifamily PPH. Age-rest ricted PPH based on EPS research of age-restricted units in the region. [2] See Table B-5.
[3] Percentage of unrestricted allocation factor for same type of unit (i.e., single family, multifamily). [4] See Table B-4 for single family and multifamily allocation factors. Age-restricted allocation factor = age-restricted pct.* factor for unrestricted unit of same type. [5] Age-restricted multifamily PPH allocati on factor set so that PPH=1. Calculated factor would have been slightly lower (0.33), resulting in a PPH less than 1.
Factors relative to medium single family unit
PPH Allocation Factor VMT Allocation Factor
Prepared by EPS 3/22/2026 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\252000\252057 Suncreek Nexus Study Update\Models\252057 M1 NEW 3.18.26.xlsx B-7
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
DRAFT
Table B-2
SunCreek Specific Plan Fee Nexus Study Update - 2026
Residential Units and Population Summary
Land Use Acres
Revised
Dwelling Units PPH Population
Source Table 4 Table 4
Single Family
Low Density 163.0 840 2.95 2,478
Medium Density 367.1 2,369 2.95 6,989
Compact Density 27.5 314 2.03 637
Total Single Family 557.6 3,523 2.87 10,104
Multifamily
High Density 44.2 999 1.54 1,538
Total Residential 601.8 4,522 2.57 11,642
Source: City of Rancho Cordova; SunCreek Owners Group.
Prepared by EPS 3/22/2026 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\252000\252057 Suncreek Nexus Study Update\Models\252057 M1 NEW 3.18.26.xlsx B-8
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
DRAFT
Table B-3
SunCreek Specific Plan Fee Nexus Study Update - 2026
Persons per Household (PPH) and Trips per Household (TPH) Factors Very Small Small Medium-Small Medium Large Very Small Small Item ≤800 801-1,200 1,201-1,600 1,601-2,400 >2,400 Total ≤800 801-1,200 >1,200 Total [1] [3]
Units (in thousands)
1 person 3.09 1,312 4,022 4,741 6,105 3,439 19,619 2.97 6,781 4,565 2,174 13,520 2 persons 4.82 900 4,287 6,050 11,610 9,240 32,087 4.49 2,474 3,233 2,352 8,059 3 persons 6.23 365 1,918 2,694 5,015 3,570 13,564 4.85 693 1,249 821 2,763 4 persons 7.71 242 1,307 2,004 4,639 4,610 12,802 6.43 210 716 597 1,524 5 persons 10.11 39 571 905 2,075 2,177 5,767 5.76 28 201 178 407 6 p e r s o n s 8 . 3 7 1 1 1 9 4 3 0 1 6 2 0 7 9 3 1 , 9 1 9 5 . 7 50000 7 p e r s o n s o r m o r e 1 1 . 7 4 1 0 1 3 5 2 0 4 3 9 0 4 0 1 1 , 1 4 0 6 . 0 00000 Total Units 2,881 12,434 16,898 30,453 24,232 86,898 10,186 9,965 6,123 26,273 Persons (in thousands) [5] 5,511 28,545 40,695 79,748 69,524 224,022 14,786 18,649 12,622 46,058 Trips (in Thousands) [5] 13,148 64,112 90,112 172,584 146,313 486,269 36,097 39,887 25,866 101,850 PPH Adjustment Factor
Average PPH 1.91 2.30 2.41 2.62 2.87 2.58 1.45 1.87 2.06 1.75 PPH Factor [6] 0.73 0.88 0.92 1.00 1.10 0.78 1.00 1.10 0.94 Multifamily PPH as Pct. of Single Family PPH 76% 82% 78% TPH Adjustment Factor
Average Daily TPH 4.56 5.16 5.33 5.67 6.04 5.60 3.54 4.00 4.22 3.88 TPH Factor [7] 0.81 0.91 0.94 1.00 1.07 0.89 1.00 1.06
PPH Factor Relative to Medium SF 78% 78% 74%
Source: US Census Bureau American Housing Survey (AHS) 2023 - National; 2022 National Household Travel Survey; EPS. [1] Trips per household from 2022 NHTS data for si ngle family detached and attached households. [2] Detached and attached single-fam ily units from AHS 2023 National data. [3] Trips per household from 2022 NHTS data for multifamily households. [4] Multifamily units from AHS 2023 National data.
[5] Assumes 7 persons in a "7 persons or more" household. [6] PPH/PPH for average size single family or multifamily unit. [7] TPH/TPH for average size single family or multifamily unit.
Single Family Multifamily
Daily
Trips per
Household
Unit Size (in sq. ft.) [2] Daily
Trips per
Household
Unit Size (in sq. ft.) [4]
Prepared by EPS 3/22/2026 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\252000\252057 Suncreek Nexus Study Update\Models\252057 M1 NEW 3.18.26.xlsx B-9
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
DRAFTTable B-4
SunCreek Specific Plan Fee Nexus Study Update - 2026
Single-Family and Multifamily PPH and VMT Allocation Factors Item Pct. [1]
Adjustment
Factor [2] PPH
Allocation
Factor
Adjustment
Factor [2]
VMT per
Unit
Allocation
Factor Acres Units
Bldg.
Sq. Ft. Population VMT
Formula A B C=B*PPH per DUE D=C/SF Med. C E F=E*VMT per DUE E/SF Med. SF E A*Total G=A*Total C*G F*G Single-Family Residential
Very Small (≤800 sq. ft.) 0% 0.73 2.04 0.73 0.81 38.02 0.81 0.0 0 0 0 Small (801-1,200 sq. ft.) 1% 0.88 2.45 0.88 0.91 42.95 0.91 5.6 35 86 1,503 Medium-Small (1,201-1,600 sq. ft.) 10% 0.92 2.57 0.92 0.94 44.42 0.94 55.8 352 903 15,637 Medium (1,601-2,400 sq. ft.) Average 50% 1.00 2.79 1.00 1.00 47.21 1.00 278.8 1,762 4,915 83,182 Large (>2,400 sq. ft.) 39% 1.10 3.06 1.10 1.07 50.30 1.07 217.5 1,374 4,200 69,111 Total [3] 100% 2.87 48.09 557.6 3,523 10,104 169,434
Persons/Trips per DUE [4] [5] 2.79 47.21
Multifamily Residential
Very Small (≤800 sq. ft.) 0% 0.78 1.15 0.41 0.89 29.87 0.63 0.0 0 0 0 Small (801-1,200 sq. ft.) Average 66% 1.00 1.49 0.53 1.00 33.74 0.71 29.2 659 981 22,234 Medium-Small (1,201-1,600 sq. ft.) 34% 1.10 1.64 0.59 1.06 35.61 0.75 15.0 340 557 12,106 Medium (1,601-2,400 sq. ft.) 0% 1.10 1.64 0.59 1.06 35.61 0.75 0.0 0 0 0 Large (>2,400 sq. ft.) 0% 1.10 1.64 0.59 1.06 35.61 0.75 0.0 0 0 0 Total [3] 100% 1.54 34.37 44.2 999 1,538 34,340
Persons/Trips per DUE [4] [5] 1.49 33.74
Persons per DUE Pct. of Single Family 53% 71%
Commercial
Retail 90% 42.56 0.90 60.8 628,489 26,749
Office 10% 50.86 1.08 6.8 69,832 3,552
Total 100% 67.5 698,321 30,301
TOTAL 2.57 4,522 698,321 11,642 234,075
[1] Provided by City.
[2] Compared to average size unit in land use category. See Table B-3. [3] Total units, acres, and PPH, from Table 6. Total VMT per unit from Table B-5. [4] Persons per DUE calculated separately for single family and multifamily units as weighted average PPH across square foot r anges.
Calculated as: Avg. PPH/Sum of (PPH factors multiplied by pct. of units). [5] Trips per DUE calculated separately for single family and multifamily units as weighted average TPH across square foot ran ges.
Calculated as: Avg. TPH/Sum of (TPH factors multiplied by pct. of units).
Population and VMTPPH VMT Factor
Prepared by EPS 3/22/2026 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\252000\252057 Suncreek Nexus Study Update\Models\252057 M1 NEW 3.18.26.xlsx B-10
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
DRAFT
Table B-5
SunCreek Specific Plan Fee Nexus Study Update - 2026
Roadways VMT
Item
ITE Manual
Edition
Daily Trips
per Unit
Trip
Length [1]
Percent New
Trips [1]
VMT
per Unit
Formula
A BC D =A*B*C
Residential Land Uses per dwelling unit per dwelling unit Low Density Residential 11th Edition 210 Single Family Detached Housing 9.43 5.1 100% 48.09 Medium Density Residential 11th Edition 210 Single Family Detached Housing 9.43 5.1 100% 48.09 Compact Density Residential 11th Edition 210 Single Family Detached Housing 9.43 5.1 100% 48.09 High Density Residential 11th Edition 220 Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) 6.74 5.1 100% 34.37 Age-Restricted - Single Family 11th Edition 251 Senior Adult Housing - Single Family 4.31 5.1 100% 21.98 Age-Restricted - Multifamily 11th Edition 252 Senior Adult Housing - Multifamily 3.24 5.1 100% 16.52 Commercial Land Uses per 1K bldg. sq. ft. per 1K bldg. sq. ft.
Retail 11th Edition 820 Shopping Center 37.01 2.3 50% 42.56 Office 11th Edition 710 General Office Building 10.84 5.1 92% 50.86 Source: Rancho Cordova TDIF Program Nexus Study (2021); ITE Manual 11th Edition; EPS. [1] From the Rancho Cordova TDIF Program Nexus Study (2021), Table 20. [2] Trip lengths and percent new trips for all land uses from the Rancho Cordova TDIF Program Nexus Study, December 2021.
Daily Trips
Land Use
Prepared by EPS 3/22/2026 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\252000\252057 Suncreek Nexus Study Update\Models\252057 M1 NEW 3.18.26.xlsx B-11
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Appendix C: Cost Allocations
Table C-1. Potable Water Cost Allocation at Buildout ................................................................................... C-1 Table C-2. Storm Drainage Co st Allocation at Buildout .................................................................................. C-2 Table C-3. Wetland Mitigation for Backbone Infrastructure Cost Allocation at Buildout.................................................................................................................... C-3 Table C-4. Wetland Preserve Buffer Cost Allocation at Buildout ............................................................... C-4 Table C-5. SunCreek Plan Area Format ion Cost Allocation at Buildout .................................................. C-5 Table C-6. Plan Area Formation Fee Reimbursement by Owner ................................................................ C-6 Table C-7. Roadways Cost Allocation at Buildout ............................................................................................. C-7 Table C-8. Trails Cost Allocation at Buildout ....................................................................................................... C-8
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
DRAFT
Table C-1
SunCreek Specific Plan Fee Nexus Study Update - 2026
Potable Water Cost Allocation at Buildout (2026$)
Item Pct. Acres
Units/
Sq. Ft.
DUEs per
Unit/Acre [1]
Total
DUEs
Percentage
Distribution
Total
Cost
Cost
per Acre
Cost per
Unit/Sq. Ft.
Residential Land Uses
units per unit per unit
Low Density 163.0 840 1.00 840 18.8% $1,245,110 $7,639 $1,482 Medium Density 367.1 2,369 1.00 2,369 53.1% $3,511,507 $9,566 $1,482 Compact Density Residential 27.5 314 0.75 236 5.3% $349,075 $12,694 $1,112 High Density Residential 44.2 999 0.75 749 16.8% $1,110,594 $25,127 $1,112 Total Residential 601.8 4,522 4,194 94.0% $6,216,286
Commercial Land Uses bldg. sq. ft. per acre per bldg. sq. ft.
Village Center
Retail 90% 19.7 203,909 4.00 79 1.8% $116,862 $5,929 $0.57 Office 10% 2.2 22,657 4.00 9 0.2% $12,985 $5,929 $0.57
Subtotal 21.9 226,566 88 2.0% $129,847
Regional Town Center
Retail 90% 41.0 424,580 4.00 164 3.7% $243,330 $5,929 $0.57 Office 10% 4.6 47,176 4.00 18 0.4% $27,037 $5,929 $0.57 Subtotal 45.6 471,755 182 4.1% $270,367
Total Nonresidential 67.5 698,321 270 6.0% $400,214
Total Residential and Commercial 669.3 4,464 100.0% $6,616,500 Source: City of Rancho Cordova; MacKay & Somps; EPS.
[1] Residential and nonresidential DUE factors per dwelling unit and acre are from the Sacramento County Water Agency Fee SchDUEle effective March 1, 2019. DUEs for commercial water use are estimated assuming 2" service; DUEs for single family residential water are estimated at 1" service. Compact density and high density residential have a density over ten units per acre and therefore have an DUE factor of 0.75 per unit.
Potable
Water
Land Use Cost Allocation Basis Cost Allocation at Buildout Prepared by EPS 3/22/2026 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\252000\252057 Suncreek Nexus Study Update\Models\252057 M1 NEW 3.18.26.xlsx C-1
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
DRAFT
Table C-2
SunCreek Specific Plan Fee Nexus Study Update - 2026
Storm Drainage Cost Allocation at Buildout (2026$)
Item Pct. Acres
Units/
Sq. Ft.
Runoff Facto
r
per Acre [1]
Total
DUEs
Percentage
Distribution
Total
Cost
Cost
per Acre
Cost per
Unit/Sq. Ft.
Residential Land Uses units per unit
Low Density 163.0 840 0.40 65 18.1% $758,893 $4,656 $903 Medium Density 367.1 2,369 0.50 184 51.0% $2,136,424 $5,820 $902 Compact Density Residential 27.5 314 0.70 19 5.4% $224,060 $8,148 $714 High Density Residential 44.2 999 0.70 31 8.6% $360,125 $8,148 $360 Total Residential 601.8 4,522 299 83.1% $3,479,502
Commercial Land Use bldg. sq. ft. per bldg. sq. ft.
Village Center
Retail 90% 19.7 203,909 0.90 18 4.9% $206,473 $10,476 $1.01 Office 10% 2.2 22,657 0.90 2 0.5% $22,941 $10,476 $1.01 Subtotal 21.9 226,566 20 5.5% $229,414
Regional Town Center
Retail 90% 41.0 424,580 0.90 37 10.3% $429,915 $10,476 $1.01 Office 10% 4.6 47,176 0.90 4 1.1% $47,768 $10,476 $1.01 Subtotal 45.6 471,755 41 11.4% $477,684
Total Nonresidential 67.5 698,321 61 16.9% $707,098
Total Residential and Commercial 669.3 360 100.0% $4,186,600 Source: City of Rancho Cordova; MacKay & Somps; EPS.
[1] Allocation factors are the impervious surface factors per acre from the City and County of Sacramento Drainage Manual.
Cost Allocation at Buildout
Storm Drainage
Cost Allocation BasisLand Use
Prepared by EPS 3/22/2026 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\252000\252057 Suncreek Nexus Study Update\Models\252057 M1 NEW 3.18.26.xlsx C-2
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
DRAFT
Table C-3
SunCreek Specific Plan Fee Nexus Study Update - 2026
Wetland Mitigation for Backbone Infrastructure Cost Allocation at Buildout (2026$) Item Pct. Acres
Units/
Sq. Ft.
DUEs
per Acre
Total
DUEs
Percentage
Distribution
Total
Cost
Cost
per Acre
Cost per
Unit/Sq. Ft.
Residential Land Uses units per unit
Low Density 163.0 840 1.0 163 24.4% $1,911,530 $11,727 $2,276 Medium Density 367.1 2,369 1.0 367 54.8% $4,305,047 $11,727 $1,817 Compact Density Residential 27.5 314 1.0 28 4.1% $322,497 $11,727 $1,027 High Density Residential 44.2 999 1.0 44 6.6% $518,341 $11,727 $519 Total Residential 601.8 4,522 602 89.9% $7,057,41 6
Commercial Land Use bldg. sq. ft. per bldg. sq. ft.
Village Center
Retail 90% 19.7 203,909 1.0 20 2.9% $231,143 $11,727 $1.13 Office 10% 2.2 22,657 1.0 2 0.3% $25,683 $11,727 $1.13
Subtotal 21.9 226,566 22 3.3% $256,825
Regional Town Cente
r
Retail 90% 41.0 424,580 1.0 41 6.1% $481,283 $11,727 $1.13 Office 10% 4.6 47,176 1.0 5 0.7% $53,476 $11,727 $1.13
Subtotal 45.6 471,755 46 6.8% $534,759
Total Nonresidential 67.5 698,321 68 10.1% $791,58 4
Total Residential and Commercial 669.3 669 100.0% $7,849,000 Source: ECORP Consulting, SCSP Owners' Group, and EPS.
Cost Allocation at Buildout
Wetland Mitigation for
Backbone Infrastructure
Cost Allocation Land Use
Prepared by EPS 3/22/2026 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\252000\252057 Suncreek Nexus Study Update\Models\252057 M1 NEW 3.18.26.xlsx C-3
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
DRAFT
Table C-4
SunCreek Specific Plan Fee Nexus Study Update - 2026
Wetland Preserve Buffer Cost Allocation at Buildout (2026$) Item Pct. Acres
Units/
Sq. Ft.
DUEs
per Acre
Total
DUEs
Percentage
Distribution
Total
Cost
Cost
per Acre
Cost per
Unit/Sq. Ft.
Residential Land Uses units per unit
Low Density 163.0 840 1.0 163 24.4% $468,616 $2,875 $558 Medium Density 367.1 2,369 1.0 367 54.8% $1,055,392 $2,875 $446 Compact Density Residential 27.5 314 1.0 28 4.1% $79,061 $2,875 $252 High Density Residential 44.2 999 1.0 44 6.6% $127,073 $2,875 $127 Total Residential 601.8 4,522 602 89.9% $1,730,141
Commercial Land Use bldg. sq. ft. per bldg. sq. ft.
Village Center
Retail 90% 19.7 203,909 1.0 20 2.9% $56,665 $2,875 $0.28 Office 10% 2.2 22,657 1.0 2 0.3% $6,296 $2,875 $0.28
Subtotal 21.9 226,566 22 3.3% $62,961
Regional Town Cente
r
Retail 90% 41.0 424,580 1.0 41 6.1% $117,988 $2,875 $0.28 Office 10% 4.6 47,176 1.0 5 0.7% $13,110 $2,875 $0.28
Subtotal 45.6 471,755 46 6.8% $131,097
Total Nonresidential 67.5 698,321 68 10.1% $194,059
Total Residential and Commercial 669.3 669 100.0% $1,924,200 Source: City of Rancho Cordova; MacKay & Somps; EPS.
Cost Allocation at Buildout
Wetland
Preserve Buffer
Cost Allocation BasisLand Use
Prepared by EPS 3/22/2026 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\252000\252057 Suncreek Nexus Study Update\Models\252057 M1 NEW 3.18.26.xlsx C-4
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
DRAFT
Table C-5
SunCreek Specific Plan Fee Nexus Study Update - 2026
SunCreek Plan Area Formation Cost Allocation at Buildout (2026$) Item Pct. Acres
Units/
Sq. Ft.
DUEs
per Acre
Total
DUEs
Percentage
Distribution
Total
Cost
Cost
per Acre
Residential Land Uses units
Low Density 163.0 840 1.0 163 24.4% $469,866 $2,883
Medium Density 367.1 2,369 1.0 367 54.8% $1,058,206 $2,883 Compact Density Residential 27.5 314 1.0 28 4.1% $79,272 $2,883 High Density Residential 44.2 999 1.0 44 6.6% $127,411 $2,883 Total Residential 601.8 4,522 602 89.9% $1,734,755
Commercial Land Use bldg. sq. ft.
Village Center
Retail 90% 19.7 203,909 1.0 20 2.9% $56,816 $2,883
Office 10% 2.2 22,657 1.0 2 0.3% $6,313 $2,883
Subtotal 21.9 226,566 22 3.3% $63,129
Regional Town Center
Retail 90% 41.0 424,580 1.0 41 6.1% $118,302 $2,883
Office 10% 4.6 47,176 1.0 5 0.7% $13,145 $2,883
Subtotal 45.6 471,755 46 6.8% $131,447
Total Nonresidential 67.5 698,321 68 10.1% $194,576
Total Residential and Commercial 669.3 669 100.0% $1,929,331 Source: SunCreek Owners' Group and EPS.
Plan Area
Formation
Land Use Cost Allocation Basis
Cost A
llocation
at Buildout
Prepared by EPS 3/22/2026 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\252000\252057 Suncreek Nexus Study Update\Models\252057 M1 NEW 3.18.26.xlsx C-5
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
DRAFTTable C-6
SunCreek Specific Plan Fee Nexus Study Update - 2026
Plan Area Formation Fee Reimbursement by Owner
Land Use Pct.
Fee
per Acre Callahan Investek Shalako
Grantline
220
Smith
Dunmore
Sierra
Sunrise Total
Development Projections at Buildout
Acres
Low Density Traditional 0.0 20.1 66.9 36.7 0.0 39.3 163.0 Medium Density Traditional 44.9 77.8 88.0 76.8 0.0 79.6 367.1 Compact Density 0.0 13.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.5 27.5
High Density 11.8 5.4 9.1 12.9 0.0 5.0 44.2
Total Residential 56.7 116.3 164.0 126.4 0.0 138.4 601.8 Commercial Acres
Village Center 0.0 5.70 16.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.9
Regional Town Center 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.6 0.0 0.0 45.6
Total Nonresidential 0.0 5.7 16.2 45.6 0.0 0.0 67.5
Plan Area Formation Fee Revenue, Costs, and Reimbursements Residential
Low Density $2,883 $0 $57,940 $192,847 $105,792 $0 $113,287 $469,866 Medium Density $2,883 $129, 429 $224,267 $253,670 $221,384 $0 $229,456 $1,058,206 Compact Density $2,883 $0 $37,474 $0 $0 $0 $41,798 $79,272 High Density $2,883 $34, 015 $15,566 $26,232 $37,186 $0 $14,413 $127,411 Total Residential $163,444 $335,248 $472,748 $364,362 $0 $398,953 $1,734,755 Commercial
Village Center
Retail 90% $2,883 $0 $14,788 $42,028 $0 $0 $0 $56,816
Office 10% $2,883 $0 $1,643 $4,670 $0 $0 $0 $6,313
Regional Town Center
Retail 90% $2,883 $0 $0 $0 $118,302 $0 $0 $118,302
Office 10% $2,883 $0 $0 $0 $13,145 $0 $0 $13,145
Total Nonresidential $0 $16,431 $46,698 $131,447 $0 $0 $194,576 Total Estimated Plan Area Formation Fees $163,444 $351,678 $519,446 $495,809 $0 $398,953 $1,929,331 Plan Area Formation Costs Paid [1] $179,045 $163,491 $568, 054 $455,016 $150,881 $412,844 $1,929,331 Estimated Reimbursements/(Fees Owed) $15,601 ($188,187) $48,608 ($40,793) $150,881 $13,891 $0 Source: City of Rancho Cordova; SunCreek Owners Group; EPS. [1] See Appendix D.
Landowner
Prepared by EPS 3/22/2026 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\252000\252057 S uncreek Nexus Study Update\ Models\252057 M1 NEW 3.18.26.xlsx C-6
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
DRAFT
Table C-7
SunCreek Specific Plan Fee Nexus Study Update - 2026
Roadways Cost Allocation at Buildout (2026$)
Item Acres [1]
Units/
Sq. Ft. [1]
DUEs per Unit/
1K sq. ft. [1]
Total
DUEs
Percentage
Distribution
Total
Cost
Cost
per Acre
Cost per
Unit/Sq. Ft.
Total
Cost
Cost
per Acre
Cost per
Unit/Sq. Ft.
(rounded) (rounded)
Residential Land Uses
Single Family
units Per Unit [1] per unit per unit
Very Small <=800 0.0 0 0.81 0 0.0% $0 $10,474 $1,658 $0 $2,277 $360 Small 801-1200 5.6 35 0.91 32 0.6% $65,524 $11,832 $1,872 $14,244 $2,572 $407 Medium Small 1,201-1,600 55.8 352 0.94 331 6.7% $681,533 $12,237 $1,936 $148,159 $2,660 $421 Medium 1,601-2,400 278.8 1,762 1.00 1,762 35.5% $3,625,594 $13,004 $2,058 $788,168 $2,827 $447 Large >2,400 217.5 1,374 1.07 1,464 29.5% $3,012,285 $13,856 $2,193 $654,841 $3,012 $476 Subtotal 557.6 3,523 3,589 72.4% $7,384,936 $1,605,411
Multifamily
Very Small <=800 0.0 0 0.63 0 0.0% $0 $8,228 $1,302 $0 $1,789 $283 Small 801-1200 29.2 659 0.71 471 9.5% $969,090 $9,294 $1,471 $210,670 $2,020 $319 Medium Small 1,201-1,600 15.0 340 0.75 256 5.2% $527,666 $9,808 $1,552 $114,709 $2,132 $337 Medium 1,601-2,400 0.0 0 0.75 0 0.0% $0 $9,808 $1,552 $0 $2,132 $337 Large >2,400 0.0 0 0.75 0 0.0% $0 $9,808 $1,552 $0 $2,132 $337 Subtotal 44.2 999 727 14.7% $1,496,756 $325,380
Age-Restricted Single Family
Very Small <=800 0.0 0 0.38 0 0.0% $0 $4,877 $772 $0 $1,060 $168 Small 801-1200 0.0 0 0.42 0 0.0% $0 $5,509 $872 $0 $1,198 $189 Medium Small 1,201-1,600 0.0 0 0.44 0 0.0% $0 $5,697 $902 $0 $1,239 $196 Medium 1,601-2,400 0.0 0 0.47 0 0.0% $0 $6,055 $958 $0 $1,316 $208 Large >2,400 0.0 0 0.50 0 0.0% $0 $6,451 $1,021 $0 $1,402 $222 Subtotal 0.0 0 0 0.0% $0 $0
Age-Restricted Multifamily
Very Small <=800 0.0 0 0.31 0 0.0% $0 $4,030 $638 $0 $876 $139 Small 801-1200 0.0 0 0.35 0 0.0% $0 $4,552 $720 $0 $989 $156 Medium Small 1,201-1,600 0.0 0 0.37 0 0.0% $0 $4,804 $760 $0 $1,044 $165 Medium 1,601-2,400 0.0 0 0.37 0 0.0% $0 $4,804 $760 $0 $1,044 $165 Large >2,400 0.0 0 0.37 0 0.0% $0 $4,804 $760 $0 $1,044 $165 Subtotal 0.0 0 0 0.0% $0 $0
Total Residential 601.8 4,522 4,316 87.1% $1,930,791
Commercial Land Uses bldg. sq. ft. Per 1K sq. ft. [2] per bldg. sq. ft. per bldg. sq. ft.
Village Center
Retail 90% 19.7 203,909 0.90 184 3.7% $378,270 $11,724 $1.86 $82,232 $2,549 $0.40 Office 10% 2.2 22,657 1.08 24 0.5% $50,226 $14,010 $2.22 $10,919 $3,046 $0.48 Subtotal 21.9 226,566 208 4.2% $428,496 $25,734 $1.89 $93,151 Regional Town Center
Retail 90% 41.0 424,580 0.90 383 7.7% $787,632 $19,192 $1.86 $171,223 $2,549 $0.40 Office 10% 4.6 47,176 1.08 51 1.0% $104,581 $22,934 $2.22 $22,735 $3,046 $0.48 Subtotal 45.6 471,755 434 8.7% $892,212 $19,566 $1.89 $193,958 Total Commercial 67.5 698,321 642 12.9% $1,320,708 $287,109 Total Residential and Commercial 669.3 4,958 100.0% $10,202,400 $2,217,900 Source: City of Rancho Cordova; MacKay & Somps; EPS.
[1] See Table B-4 for distribution of land uses and calculation of DUE factors.
Land Use Cost Allocation Basis Onsite Road Cost Allocation Offsite Road Cost Allocation Prepared by EPS 3/22/2026 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\252000\252057 Suncreek Nexus Study Update\Models\252057 M1 NEW 3.18.26.xlsx C-7
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
DRAFT
Table C-8
SunCreek Specific Plan Fee Nexus Study Update - 2026
Trails Cost Allocation at Buildout (2026$)
Item Acres
Units/
Sq. Ft.
DUEs per Unit/
1K sq. ft. [1]
Total
DUEs
Percentage
Distribution
Total
Cost
Cost
per Acre
Cost per
Unit/Sq. Ft.
(rounded)
Residential Land Uses
Single Family
units Per Unit [1] per unit
Very Small <=800 0.0 0 0.73 0 0.0% $0 $4,581 $725
Small 801-1200 5.6 35 0.88 31 0.7% $30,448 $5,498 $870
Medium Small 1,201-1,600 55.8 352 0.92 324 7.8% $321,217 $5,767 $912 Medium 1,601-2,400 278.8 1,762 1.00 1,762 42.2% $1,748,456 $6,271 $992 Large >2,400 217.5 1,374 1.10 1,505 36.1% $1,493,843 $6,871 $1,087 Subtotal 557.6 3,523 3,622 86.8% $3,593,964
Multifamily
Very Small <=800 0.0 0 0.41 0 0.0% $0 $2,596 $411
Small 801-1200 29.2 659 0.53 352 8.4% $348,934 $3,346 $529 Medium Small 1,201-1,600 15.0 340 0.59 200 4.8% $198,302 $3,686 $583 Medium 1,601-2,400 0.0 0 0.59 0 0.0% $0 $3,686 $583
Large >2,400 0.0 0 0.59 0 0.0% $0 $3,686 $583
Subtotal 44.2 999 551 13.2% $547,236
Age-Restricted Single Family
Very Small <=800 0.0 0 0.47 0 0.0% $0 $2,956 $468
Small 801-1200 0.0 0 0.57 0 0.0% $0 $3,547 $561
Medium Small 1,201-1,600 0.0 0 0.59 0 0.0% $0 $3,721 $589 Medium 1,601-2,400 0.0 0 0.65 0 0.0% $0 $4,046 $640
Large >2,400 0.0 0 0.71 0 0.0% $0 $4,433 $701
Subtotal 0.0 0 0 0.0% $0
Age-Restricted Multifamily
Very Small <=800 0.0 0 0.36 0 0.0% $0 $2,248 $356
Small 801-1200 0.0 0 0.43 0 0.0% $0 $2,698 $427
Medium Small 1,201-1,600 0.0 0 0.47 0 0.0% $0 $2,971 $470 Medium 1,601-2,400 0.0 0 0.47 0 0.0% $0 $2,971 $470
Large >2,400 0.0 0 0.47 0 0.0% $0 $2,971 $470
Subtotal 0.0 0 0 0.0% $0
Total Residential 601.8 4,522 4,173 100.0% $4,141,200
Commercial Land Uses bldg. sq. ft. Per 1K sq. ft. [2] per bldg. sq. ft.
Village Center
Retail 90% 19.7 203,909 0.00 0 0.0% $0 $0 $0.00
Office 10% 2.2 22,657 0.00 0 0.0% $0 $0 $0.00
Subtotal 21.9 226,566 0 0.0% $0 $0 $0.00
Regional Town Center
Retail 90% 41.0 424,580 0.00 0 0.0% $0 $0 $0.00
Office 10% 4.6 47,176 0.00 0 0.0% $0 $0 $0.00
Subtotal 45.6 471,755 0 0.0% $0 $0 $0.00
Total Commercial 67.5 698,321 0 0.0% $0
Total Residential and Commercial 669.3 4,173 100.0% $4,141,200 Source: City of Rancho Cordova; MacKay & Somps; EPS.
[1] See Table B-4 for calculation of DUE factors.
Land Use Cost Allocation Basis Trails Cost Allocation
Prepared by EPS 3/22/2026 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\252000\252057 Suncreek Nexus Study Update\Models\252057 M1 NEW 3.18.26.xlsx C-8
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Appendix D: Preliminary Co st Estimate for SCSP
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
(prepared by MacKay & Somps)
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
27146.000
PRELIMINARY
SUNCREEK PLAN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN
Proposed Project
COST ESTIMATE
Backbone Infrastructure
Rancho Cordova, California
September 13, 2021
P:\27146\Admin\Estimates\SunCreek Finance Plan\SunCreek_Cost Estimate\Financing Plan EIR-EIS Estimate_2021.xlsx Page 1 of 112 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Preliminary Cost Estimate
SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
27146.000
NOTES
1. This estimate is prepared as a guide only and is subject to possible change. It has been prepared to a standard of accuracy which, to the best of our knowledge and judgment, is sufficient to satisfy our understanding of the purpose of this estimate. MacKay & Somps makes no warranty, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy of this estimate.
2. This estimate does not consider the following:
a. Cost associated with environmental (wetland) mitigations or biological surveys b. Phased construction or out-of-regular-sequence construction c. Costs associated with ground water or inclement weather conditions d. Financial Charges
e. Bonds
f. Land costs, acquisition of right of way, easements, and/or rights of entry g. Assessments from assessment, lighting & landscaping, Mello-Roos districts or the like
3. Costs presented herein represent an opinion based on historical information. No provision has been made for inflation.
4. The "cash flow" situation may be different than the fees, credits, and reimbursements itemized in this estimate.
5. Interim improvements may be required depending on development timing of individual units.
6. Cost for unsuitable material removal is not included in this estimate.
7. Costs are preliminary and subject to change upon more detailed design and analysis.
8. Cost for rock excavation is not included in this estimate.
9. Cost for Rough Grade Excavation is based on an estimated excavation volume which is calculated by assuming an average excavation depth of 2-feet across the roadways segment clear and grub limits.
10. Grade-separated crossings of major roadways are included in this estimate and it is presumed that they will be added to the City's CIP. Estimated cost to provide grade separated trail crossings are based on MacKay & Somps Technical Memorandum No. 9, dated Sept. 28, 2010 and revised with updated unit prices.
11. Cost for construction and financing of the Americanos Blvd 24" water supply pipeline north of Chrysanthy Blvd, the Chrysanthy Blvd 24" water supply pipeline west of Phase 9, the Grant Line Rd water supply pipelines north and south of Phase 9, the Glory Ln water supply pipelines east of Grant Line Rd and the Cordova Hills water tank are not included in this estimate. It is assumed that these improvements will be constructed by Zone 40 or others and paid for by standard SCWA Zone 40 water connection fees.
P:\27146\Admin\Estimates\SunCreek Finance Plan\SunCreek_Cost Estimate\Financing Plan EIR-EIS Estimate_2021.xlsx Page 2 of 112 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Preliminary Cost Estimate
SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
27146.000
NOTES
12. This estimate reflects the sewer system proposed for the project as shown in the approved Level 2 Sewer Study prepared by Mackay & Somps dated April 6, 2016.
13. This estimate assumes that Grant Line Road improvements along the project boundary will be constructed by the City CIP Program and that only the Chrysanthy Blvd/Grant Line Road interim intersection improvements, a city CIP funded improvement, will be built by the SunCreek Specific Plan.
14. Backbone sewer infrastructure cost is assumed to be publicly bid therefore fully reimbursed by SASD.
15. This estimate reflects the water system proposed for the project as shown in the Technical Memorandum - Phase 1 SunCreek Specific Plan, Exhibit C dated March 8, 2016.
16. Credit unit prices for potable water are based on the Sacramento County Water Agency (SCWA) Schedule C - Credits for Transmission Mains dated January 23, 2018.
P:\27146\Admin\Estimates\SunCreek Finance Plan\SunCreek_Cost Estimate\Financing Plan EIR-EIS Estimate_2021.xlsx Page 3 of 112 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Preliminary Cost Estimate
SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
27146.000
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
(CREDITS) NET COST
A. PLAN AREA ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS (ON-SITE) $94,013,398 ($24,343,384) $69,670,014 B. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS (OFF-SITE) $10,315,500 ($8,530,800) $1,784,700 C. STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS $9,977,800 ($3,548,900) $6,428,900 D. SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS $22,421,800 ($22,421,800) $0 E. POTABLE WATER TRANSMISSION MAIN IMPROVEMENTS $13,587,600 ($8,248,700) $5,338,900 F. PARK CORRIDORS AND TRAILS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS $19,687,900 ($16,351,700) $3,336,200 G. WETLAND BUFFER IMPROVEMENTS $1,548,400 $0 $1,548,400 H. WETLAND MITIGATION $6,397,800 $0 $6,397,800
TOTAL BACKBONE INFRASTRUCTURE CONSTRUCTION COST $177,950,198 ($83,445,284) $94,504,914 USE $177,950,200 ($83,445,300) $94,505,000
CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
P:\27146\Admin\Estimates\SunCreek Finance Plan\SunCreek_Cost Estimate\Financing Plan EIR-EIS Estimate_2021.xlsx Page 4 of 112 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Preliminary Cost Estimate
SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
27146.000
A. PLAN AREA ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS (ON-SITE) - Exhibit B
SEGMENT
NO. DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT SEC
UNIT
PRICE AMOUNT
UNIT PRICE
(CREDITS)
AMOUNT
(CREDITS) NET COST
1. Rancho Cordova Parkway
RD201 Rancho Cordova Parkway: Kiefer Boulevard to Southern Project Limit 500-ft South of Kiefer Blvd to Southern Project Limit 2,140 LF B, BB $1,240 $2,653,600 $260 ($556,400) $2,097,200 Traffic Signal - Kiefer Blvd (CIP) 1 EA $400,000 $400,000 $252,076 ($252,076) $147,924 Traffic Signal - Minor Road Intersection (Plan Area Fee) 1 EA $400,000 $400,000 $0 $0 $400,000 Subtotal Raw Construction Cost $3,453,600 ($808,476) $2,645,124 Contingency (20%) $690,700 $0 $690,700
Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (15%) $518,000 $0 $518,000 2035 Transportation CIP Contingency (15%) $0 ($121,300) ($121,300) 2035 Transportation CIP Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (35%) $0 ($283,000) ($283,000) Total Cost $4,662,300 ($1,212,776) $3,449,524
RD301 Rancho Cordova Parkway: Central Park Drive to Kiefer Boulevard Central Park Dr to 500-ft North of Kiefer Blvd 2,190 LF A, AA $1,170 $2,562,300 $440 ($963,600) $1,598,700 Traffic Signal - Central Park Dr (Plan Area Fee) 1 EA $400,000 $400,000 $0 $0 $400,000 Subtotal Raw Construction Cost $2,962,300 ($963,600) $1,998,700 Contingency (20%) $592,500 $0 $592,500
Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (15%) $444,300 $0 $444,300 2035 Transportation CIP Contingency (15%) $0 ($144,500) ($144,500) 2035 Transportation CIP Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (35%) $0 ($337,300) ($337,300) Total Cost $3,999,100 ($1,445,400) $2,553,700
RD501 Rancho Cordova Parkway: Northern Project Limit to Central Park Drive Northern Project Limit to Central Park Dr 1,590 LF A, AA $1,170 $1,860,300 $440 ($699,600) $1,160,700 Rancho Cordova Pkwy & North Campus Road 4x4 Intx 1 EA Y, YY $2,162,150 $2,162,150 $630,260 ($630,260) $1,531,890 Traffic Signal - North Campus Rd (CIP) 1 EA $400,000 $400,000 $252,076 ($252,076) $147,924 Subtotal Raw Construction Cost $4,422,450 ($1,581,936) $2,840,514 Contingency (20%) $884,500 $0 $884,500
Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (15%) $663,400 $0 $663,400 2035 Transportation CIP Contingency (15%) $0 ($237,300) ($237,300) 2035 Transportation CIP Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (35%) $0 ($553,700) ($553,700) Total Cost $5,970,350 ($2,372,936) $3,597,414
Total Rancho Cordova Parkway Roadway Improvements (On-Site) Cost $14,631,750 ($5,031,112) $9,600,638 P:\27146\Admin\Estimates\SunCreek Finance Plan\SunCreek_Cost Estimate\Financing Plan EIR-EIS Estimate_2021.xlsx Page 5 of 112 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Preliminary Cost Estimate
SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
27146.000
SEGMENT
NO. DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT SEC
UNIT
PRICE AMOUNT
UNIT PRICE
(CREDITS)
AMOUNT
(CREDITS) NET COST
2. Kiefer Boulevard
RD101 Kiefer Boulevard: Sunrise Blvd to west of Rancho Cordova Pkwy 500-ft East of Sunrise Blvd to 2,260-ft East of Sunrise Blvd 1,760 LF C, CC $1,150 $2,024,000 $450 ($792,000) $1,232,000 Kiefer Blvd and Sunrise Blvd Mod. 4x6 Intersection 1 EA U, UU $708,660 $708,660 $206,140 ($206,140) $502,520 Traffic Signal Modification - Sunrise Blvd (CIP) 1 EA $400,000 $400,000 $252,076 ($252,076) $147,924 Traffic Signal - VC Land Use Loop Road Intersection (Plan Area Fee) 1 EA $400,000 $400,000 $0 $0 $400,000 Subtotal Raw Construction Cost $3,532,660 ($1,250,216) $2,282,444 Contingency (20%) $706,500 $0 $706,500
Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (15%) $529,900 $0 $529,900 2035 Transportation CIP Contingency (15%) $0 ($187,500) ($187,500) 2035 Transportation CIP Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (35%) $0 ($437,600) ($437,600) Total Cost $4,769,060 ($1,875,316) $2,893,744
RD202 Kiefer Boulevard: west of Rancho Cordova to Rancho Cordova 1,650-ft West of Rancho Cordova Pkwy to 500-ft West of RC Pkwy 1,150 LF D, DD $1,130 $1,299,500 $360 ($414,000) $885,500 3,050-ft East of Sunrise Blvd to 1,650-ft West of Rancho Cordova Pkwy 1,400 LF C, CC $1,150 $1,610,000 $450 ($630,000) $980,000 Kiefer Blvd and Rancho Cordova Pkwy Mod. 4x4 Intersection (Ph1) 1 EA V, VV (Ph1) $1,485,970 $1,485,970 $312,110 ($312,110) $1,173,860 Subtotal Raw Construction Cost $4,395,470 ($1,356,110) $3,039,360 Contingency (20%) $879,100 $0 $879,100
Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (15%) $659,300 $0 $659,300 2035 Transportation CIP Contingency (15%) $0 ($203,400) ($203,400) 2035 Transportation CIP Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (35%) $0 ($474,600) ($474,600) Total Cost $5,933,870 ($2,034,110) $3,899,760
RD401 Kiefer Boulevard: Rancho Cordova Parkway to Americanos Boulevard 500-ft East of Rancho Cordova Pkwy to 500-ft West of Americanos Blvd 2,970 LF E, EE $1,080 $3,207,600 $240 ($712,800) $2,494,800 Kiefer Blvd and Rancho Cordova Pkwy Mod. 4x4 Intersection (Ph2) 1 EA V, VV (Ph2) $1,506,800 $1,506,800 $261,900 ($261,900) $1,244,900 Traffic Signal - Investek North-South Access Rd (Plan Area Fee) 1 EA $400,000 $400,000 $0 $0 $400,000 Subtotal Raw Construction Cost $5,114,400 ($974,700) $4,139,700 Contingency (20%) $1,022,900 $0 $1,022,900
Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (15%) $767,200 $0 $767,200 2035 Transportation CIP Contingency (15%) $0 ($146,200) ($146,200) 2035 Transportation CIP Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (35%) $0 ($341,100) ($341,100) Total Cost $6,904,500 ($1,462,000) $5,442,500
P:\27146\Admin\Estimates\SunCreek Finance Plan\SunCreek_Cost Estimate\Financing Plan EIR-EIS Estimate_2021.xlsx Page 6 of 112 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Preliminary Cost Estimate
SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
27146.000
SEGMENT
NO. DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT SEC
UNIT
PRICE AMOUNT
UNIT PRICE
(CREDITS)
AMOUNT
(CREDITS) NET COST
RD701 Kiefer Boulevard: Americanos Boulevard to Eastern Project Limit Americanos Blvd to 500-ft west of Eastern Project Limit 10 LF E, EE $1,080 $10,800 $240 ($2,400) $8,400 Kiefer Blvd and Americanos Blvd. Mod. 4x4 Tee 1 EA T, TT $2,075,020 $2,075,020 $466,240 ($466,240) $1,608,780 Traffic Signal - Americanos Blvd (CIP) 1 EA $400,000 $400,000 $252,076 ($252,076) $147,924 Subtotal Raw Construction Cost $2,485,820 ($720,716) $1,765,104 Contingency (20%) $497,200 $0 $497,200
Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (15%) $372,900 $0 $372,900 2035 Transportation CIP Contingency (15%) $0 ($108,100) ($108,100) 2035 Transportation CIP Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (35%) $0 ($252,300) ($252,300) Total Cost $3,355,920 ($1,081,116) $2,274,804
Total Kiefer Boulevard Roadway Improvements (On-Site) Cost $20,963,350 ($6,452,542) $14,510,808
3. Americanos Boulevard
RD702 Americanos Boulevard: Kiefer Boulevard to Central Park Drive 500-ft North of Kiefer Blvd to Central Park Dr 1,770 LF F, FF $1,750 $3,097,500 $350 ($619,500) $2,478,000 Subtotal Raw Construction Cost $3,097,500 ($619,500) $2,478,000 Contingency (20%) $619,500 $0 $619,500
Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (15%) $464,600 $0 $464,600 2035 Transportation CIP Contingency (15%) $0 ($92,900) ($92,900) 2035 Transportation CIP Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (35%) $0 ($216,800) ($216,800) Total Cost $4,181,600 ($929,200) $3,252,400
RD703 Americanos Boulevard: Central Park Drive to north of Central Park Drive Central Park Dr to 340-ft north of Central Park Dr 340 LF G, GG $1,810 $615,400 $350 ($119,000) $496,400 Traffic Signal - Central Park Dr (Plan Area Fee) 1 EA $400,000 $400,000 $0 $0 $400,000 Subtotal Raw Construction Cost $1,015,400 ($119,000) $896,400 Contingency (20%) $203,100 $0 $203,100
Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (15%) $152,300 $0 $152,300 2035 Transportation CIP Contingency (15%) $0 ($17,900) ($17,900) 2035 Transportation CIP Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (35%) $0 ($41,700) ($41,700) Total Cost $1,370,800 ($178,600) $1,192,200
RD704 Americanos Boulevard: Central Park Drive to High School Access Road 340-ft north of Central Park Dr to High School Access Rd 900 LF G, GG $1,810 $1,629,000 $350 ($315,000) $1,314,000 Subtotal Raw Construction Cost $1,629,000 ($315,000) $1,314,000 Contingency (20%) $325,800 $0 $325,800
Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (15%) $244,400 $0 $244,400 2035 Transportation CIP Contingency (15%) $0 ($47,300) ($47,300) 2035 Transportation CIP Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (35%) $0 ($110,300) ($110,300) Total Cost $2,199,200 ($472,600) $1,726,600
P:\27146\Admin\Estimates\SunCreek Finance Plan\SunCreek_Cost Estimate\Financing Plan EIR-EIS Estimate_2021.xlsx Page 7 of 112 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Preliminary Cost Estimate
SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
27146.000
SEGMENT
NO. DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT SEC
UNIT
PRICE AMOUNT
UNIT PRICE
(CREDITS)
AMOUNT
(CREDITS) NET COST
RD801 Americanos Boulevard: High School Access Rd to North Campus Rd High School Access Rd to 500-ft south of North Campus Rd 670 LF H, HH $1,640 $1,098,800 $370 ($247,900) $850,900 Americanos Blvd & North Campus Road 4x4 Tee 1 EA Z,ZZ $2,396,730 $2,396,730 $631,690 ($631,690) $1,765,040 Subtotal Raw Construction Cost $3,495,530 ($879,590) $2,615,940 Contingency (20%) $699,100 $0 $699,100
Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (15%) $524,300 $0 $524,300 2035 Transportation CIP Contingency (15%) $0 ($131,900) ($131,900) 2035 Transportation CIP Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (35%) $0 ($307,900) ($307,900) Total Cost $4,718,930 ($1,319,390) $3,399,540
RD802 Americanos Boulevard: North Campus Rd to north of North Campus Rd 500-ft north of North Campus Rd to Phase 9 Boundary 930 LF G, GG $1,810 $1,683,300 $350 ($325,500) $1,357,800 Traffic Signal - North Campus Rd (CIP) 1 EA $400,000 $400,000 $252,076 ($252,076) $147,924 Subtotal Raw Construction Cost $2,083,300 ($577,576) $1,505,724 Contingency (20%) $416,700 $0 $416,700
Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (15%) $312,500 $0 $312,500 2035 Transportation CIP Contingency (15%) $0 ($86,600) ($86,600) 2035 Transportation CIP Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (35%) $0 ($202,200) ($202,200) Total Cost $2,812,500 ($866,376) $1,946,124
RD901 Americanos Boulevard: North of North Campus Road
Phase 9 Boundary to to 380-ft north of North Campus Rd 380 LF G, GG $1,810 $687,800 $350 ($133,000) $554,800 Subtotal Raw Construction Cost $687,800 ($133,000) $554,800 Contingency (20%) $137,600 $0 $137,600
Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (15%) $103,200 $0 $103,200 2035 Transportation CIP Contingency (15%) $0 ($20,000) ($20,000) 2035 Transportation CIP Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (35%) $0 ($46,600) ($46,600) Total Cost $928,600 ($199,600) $729,000
RD902 Americanos Boulevard: north of North Campus Rd to Chrysanthy Blvd 380-ft north of North Campus Rd to 500-ft South of Chrysanthy Blvd 1,110 LF F, FF $1,750 $1,942,500 $350 ($388,500) $1,554,000 Traffic Signal - Chrysanthy Blvd (CIP) 1 EA $400,000 $400,000 $252,076 ($252,076) $147,924 Subtotal Raw Construction Cost $2,342,500 ($640,576) $1,701,924 Contingency (20%) $468,500 $0 $468,500
Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (15%) $351,400 $0 $351,400 2035 Transportation CIP Contingency (15%) $0 ($96,100) ($96,100) 2035 Transportation CIP Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (35%) $0 ($224,200) ($224,200) Total Cost $3,162,400 ($960,876) $2,201,524
Total Americanos Boulevard Roadway Improvements (On-Site) Cost $19,374,030 ($4,926,642) $14,447,388 P:\27146\Admin\Estimates\SunCreek Finance Plan\SunCreek_Cost Estimate\Financing Plan EIR-EIS Estimate_2021.xlsx Page 8 of 112 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Preliminary Cost Estimate
SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
27146.000
SEGMENT
NO. DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT SEC
UNIT
PRICE AMOUNT
UNIT PRICE
(CREDITS)
AMOUNT
(CREDITS) NET COST
4. Chrysanthy Boulevard
RD903 Chrysanthy Boulevard: Western Project Limit to Grant Line Road Western Project Limit to 500-ft West of Americanos Blvd 950 LF I, II $1,090 $1,035,500 $270 ($256,500) $779,000 500-ft East of Americanos Blvd to 500-ft west of Grant Line Rd 2760 LF I, II $1,090 $3,008,400 $270 ($745,200) $2,263,200 Chrysanthy Blvd & Americanos Blvd, Mod. 4x4 Tee 1 EA W, WW $1,925,980 $1,925,980 $459,070 ($459,070) $1,466,910 Chrysanthy Blvd & Grantline Rd, Mod. 4x4 Tee 1 EA X, XX $885,870 $885,870 $282,830 ($282,830) $603,040 Traffic Signal - LTC Access Rd (Plan Area Fee) 1 EA $400,000 $400,000 $0 $0 $400,000 Laguna Creek Tributary Bridge 1 EA $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 ($1,500,000) $0 Traffic Signal - Grant Line Rd (CIP) 1 EA $400,000 $400,000 $252,076 ($252,076) $147,924 Subtotal Raw Construction Cost $9,155,750 ($3,495,676) $5,660,074 Contingency (20%) $1,831,200 $0 $1,831,200
Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (15%) $1,373,400 $0 $1,373,400 2035 Transportation CIP Contingency (15%) $0 ($524,400) ($524,400) 2035 Transportation CIP Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (35%) $0 ($1,223,500) ($1,223,500) Total Cost $12,360,350 ($5,243,576) $7,116,774
Total Chrysanthy Boulevard Roadway Improvements (On-Site) Cost $12,360,350 ($5,243,576) $7,116,774
5. Sunrise Boulevard
RD102 Sunrise Boulevard: Kiefer Boulevard to Southern Project Limit 500-ft South of Kiefer Blvd to 1,040-ft south of Kiefer Blvd 540 LF K $740 $399,600 $0 $0 $399,600 1,040-ft south of Kiefer Blvd to Southern Project Limit 1,630 LF L $720 $1,173,600 $0 $0 $1,173,600 Traffic Signal - VC Land Use Loop Road Intersection (Plan Area Fee) 1 EA $400,000 $400,000 $0 $0 $400,000 Subtotal Raw Construction Cost $1,973,200 $0 $1,973,200 Contingency (20%) $394,600 $0 $394,600
Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (15%) $296,000 $0 $296,000 2035 Transportation CIP Contingency (15%) $0 $0 $0
2035 Transportation CIP Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (35%) $0 $0 $0 Total Cost $2,663,800 $0 $2,663,800
Total Sunrise Boulevard Roadway Improvements (On-Site) Cost $2,663,800 $0 $2,663,800 P:\27146\Admin\Estimates\SunCreek Finance Plan\SunCreek_Cost Estimate\Financing Plan EIR-EIS Estimate_2021.xlsx Page 9 of 112 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Preliminary Cost Estimate
SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
27146.000
SEGMENT
NO. DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT SEC
UNIT
PRICE AMOUNT
UNIT PRICE
(CREDITS)
AMOUNT
(CREDITS) NET COST
6. North Campus Road
RD502 North Campus Road: Rancho Cordova Pkwy to east of West Park Drive 500-ft east of Rancho Cordova Pkwy to 1,400-ft east of West Park Dr 2,230 LF M, MM $1,830 $4,080,900 $440 ($981,200) $3,099,700 Traffic Signal - West Park Dr (Plan Area Fee) 1 EA $400,000 $400,000 $0 $0 $400,000 1,400-ft east of West Park Dr to Phase 5 Boundary 380 LF N, NN $1,200 $456,000 $230 ($87,400) $368,600 Subtotal Raw Construction Cost $4,936,900 ($1,068,600) $3,868,300 Contingency (20%) $987,400 $0 $987,400
Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (15%) $740,500 $0 $740,500 2035 Transportation CIP Contingency (15%) $0 ($160,300) ($160,300) 2035 Transportation CIP Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (35%) $0 ($374,000) ($374,000) Total Cost $6,664,800 ($1,602,900) $5,061,900
RD602 North Campus Road: east of West Park to west of Americanos Phase 5 Boundary to 700-ft east 700 LF N, NN $1,200 $840,000 $230 ($161,000) $679,000 700-ft east of Phase 5 Boundary to Phase 6 Boundary 640 LF M, MM $1,822 $1,166,018 $433 ($277,412) $888,606 Subtotal Raw Construction Cost $2,006,018 ($438,412) $1,567,606 Contingency (20%) $401,200 $0 $401,200
Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (15%) $300,900 $0 $300,900 2035 Transportation CIP Contingency (15%) $0 ($65,800) ($65,800) 2035 Transportation CIP Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (35%) $0 ($153,400) ($153,400) Total Cost $2,708,118 ($657,612) $2,050,506
RD803 North Campus Road: west of Americanos Drive to Americanos Drive Phase 6 Boundary to 500-ft west of Americanos Dr 650 LF M, MM $1,830 $1,189,500 $440 ($286,000) $903,500 Subtotal Raw Construction Cost $1,189,500 ($286,000) $903,500 Contingency (20%) $237,900 $0 $237,900
Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (15%) $178,400 $0 $178,400 2035 Transportation CIP Contingency (15%) $0 ($42,900) ($42,900) 2035 Transportation CIP Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (35%) $0 ($100,100) ($100,100) Total Cost $1,605,800 ($429,000) $1,176,800
Total North Campus Road Roadway Improvements (On-Site) Cost $10,978,718 ($2,689,512) $8,289,206 P:\27146\Admin\Estimates\SunCreek Finance Plan\SunCreek_Cost Estimate\Financing Plan EIR-EIS Estimate_2021.xlsx Page 10 of 112 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Preliminary Cost Estimate
SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
27146.000
SEGMENT
NO. DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT SEC
UNIT
PRICE AMOUNT
UNIT PRICE
(CREDITS)
AMOUNT
(CREDITS) NET COST
7. West Park Drive
RD503 West Park Drive: North Campus Road to Central Park Drive North Campus Rd to Central Park Dr 2,030 LF O $1,690 $3,430,700 $0 $0 $3,430,700 Subtotal Raw Construction Cost $3,430,700 $0 $3,430,700 Contingency (20%) $686,100 $0 $686,100
Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (15%) $514,600 $0 $514,600 2035 Transportation CIP Contingency (15%) $0 $0 $0
2035 Transportation CIP Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (35%) $0 $0 $0 Total Cost $4,631,400 $0 $4,631,400
Total West Park Drive Roadway Improvements (On-Site) Cost $4,631,400 $0 $4,631,400
8. Central Park Drive
RD504 Central Park Drive: Rancho Cordova Pkwy to east of West Park Drive Rancho Cordova Pkwy to West Park Dr 1,980 LF P $1,530 $3,029,400 $0 $0 $3,029,400 West Park Dr to 440-ft east of West Park Dr 440 LF Q $1,420 $624,800 $0 $0 $624,800 440-ft east of West Park Dr to 1,380-ft west of Americanos Blvd 240 LF R $1,650 $396,000 $0 $0 $396,000 Subtotal Raw Construction Cost $4,050,200 $0 $4,050,200 Contingency (20%) $810,000 $0 $810,000
Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (15%) $607,500 $0 $607,500 2035 Transportation CIP Contingency (15%) $0 $0 $0
2035 Transportation CIP Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (35%) $0 $0 $0 Total Cost $5,467,700 $0 $5,467,700
RD601 Central Park Drive: east of West Park Drive to Americanos Drive 680-ft east of West Park Dr to 750-ft west of Americanos Blvd 630 LF R $1,650 $1,039,500 $0 $0 $1,039,500 750-ft west of Americanos Blvd to Americanos Dr 750 LF S $1,520 $1,140,000 $0 $0 $1,140,000 Subtotal Raw Construction Cost $2,179,500 $0 $2,179,500 Contingency (20%) $435,900 $0 $435,900
Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (15%) $326,900 $0 $326,900 2035 Transportation CIP Contingency (15%) $0 $0 $0
2035 Transportation CIP Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (35%) $0 $0 $0 Total Cost $2,942,300 $0 $2,942,300
Total Central Park Drive Roadway Improvements (On-Site) Cost $8,410,000 $0 $8,410,000 P:\27146\Admin\Estimates\SunCreek Finance Plan\SunCreek_Cost Estimate\Financing Plan EIR-EIS Estimate_2021.xlsx Page 11 of 112 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Preliminary Cost Estimate
SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
27146.000
SEGMENT
NO. DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT SEC
UNIT
PRICE AMOUNT
UNIT PRICE
(CREDITS)
AMOUNT
(CREDITS) NET COST
1. Rancho Cordova Parkway $14,631,750 ($5,031,112) $9,600,638
2. Kiefer Boulevard $20,963,350 ($6,452,542) $14,510,808
3. Americanos Boulevard $19,374,030 ($4,926,642) $14,447,388
4. Chrysanthy Boulevard $12,360,350 ($5,243,576) $7,116,774
5. Sunrise Boulevard $2,663,800 $0 $2,663,800
6. North Campus Road $10,978,718 ($2,689,512) $8,289,206
7. West Park Drive $4,631,400 $0 $4,631,400
8. Central Park Drive $8,410,000 $0 $8,410,000
$94,013,398 ($24,343,384) $69,670,014
PLAN AREA ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS (ON-SITE) COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY GRAND TOTAL PLAN AREA ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS (On-Site) COST P:\27146\Admin\Estimates\SunCreek Finance Plan\SunCreek_Cost Estimate\Financing Plan EIR-EIS Estimate_2021.xlsx Page 12 of 112 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Preliminary Cost Estimate
SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
27146.000
B. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS (OFF-SITE) - Exhibit C
SEGMENT
NO. DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT SEC
UNIT
PRICE AMOUNT
UNIT PRICE
(CREDITS)
AMOUNT
(CREDITS) NET COST
1. Rancho Cordova Parkway
RW100 Rancho Cordova Parkway: Chrysanthy Blvd to Douglas Blvd Chrysanthy Blvd to Douglas Blvd 2,220 LF O-RR $417 $925,740 $417 ($925,740) $0 Traffic Signal 1 EA Included $0 Included $0 $0
Intersection Legs (East and West) 2 EA $350,000 $700,000 $350,000 ($700,000) $0 Intersection Legs (South) 1 EA Included $0 Included $0 $0 Right-of-Way 10% $1,625,740 $162,574 ($1,625,740) ($162,574) $0 Subtotal Raw Construction Cost $1,788,314 ($1,788,314) $0 Contingency (15%) $268,200 ($268,200) $0
Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (35%) $625,900 ($625,900) $0 Total Cost $2,682,414 ($2,682,414) $0
Use $2,682,500 ($2,682,500) $0
2. Kiefer Boulevard
RW101 Kiefer Boulevard: Eastern Project Limit to Grant Line Rd Eastern Project Limit to Grant Line Rd 3,730 LF O-SS $383 $1,428,590 $383 ($1,428,590) $0 Laguna Creek Bridge 6,720 DSF $175 $1,176,000 $175 ($1,176,000) $0 Grant Line Road/ Kiefer Boulevard Intersection 1 EA O-TT $398,310 $398,310 $398,310 ($398,310) $0 Right-of-Way 10% $3,002,900 $300,290 ($3,002,900) ($300,290) $0 Subtotal Raw Construction Cost $3,303,190 ($3,303,190) $0 Contingency (15%) $495,500 ($495,500) $0
Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (35%) $1,156,100 ($1,156,100) $0 Total Cost $4,954,790 ($4,954,790) $0
Use $4,954,800 ($4,954,800) $0
P:\27146\Admin\Estimates\SunCreek Finance Plan\SunCreek_Cost Estimate\Financing Plan EIR-EIS Estimate_2021.xlsx Page 13 of 112 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Preliminary Cost Estimate
SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
27146.000
SEGMENT
NO. DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT SEC
UNIT
PRICE AMOUNT
UNIT PRICE
(CREDITS)
AMOUNT
(CREDITS) NET COST
3. Jackson Road/Grant Line Road Intersection
RW102 Jackson Road/Grant Line Road Intersection
Jackson Road/Grant Line Road Intersection 1 EA O-UU $541,500 $541,500 $541,500 ($541,500) $0 Right-of-Way 10% $541,500 $54,150 ($541,500) ($54,150) $0 Subtotal Raw Construction Cost $595,650 ($595,650) $0
Contingency (15%) $89,300 ($89,300) $0
Engineering/Plan Check/Inspection (35%) $208,500 ($208,500) $0 Total Cost $893,450 ($893,450) $0
Use $893,500 ($893,500) $0
4. Reciprocal Funding Agreement1
Total Cost $1,784,660 $0 $1,784,660
Use $1,784,700 $0 $1,784,700
1. Rancho Cordova Parkway $2,682,500 ($2,682,500) $0
2. Kiefer Boulevard $4,954,800 ($4,954,800) $0
3. Jackson Road/Grant Line Road Intersection $893,500 ($893,500) $0
4. Reciprocal Funding Agreement1
$1,784,700 $0 $1,784,700
$10,315,500 ($8,530,800) $1,784,700
Note:
1. Reciprocal Funding total provided by Mark Thomas via email, 5/23/19
GRAND TOTAL ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS (OFF-SITE) COST
ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS (OFF-SITE) COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
P:\27146\Admin\Estimates\SunCreek Finance Plan\SunCreek_Cost Estimate\Financing Plan EIR-EIS Estimate_2021.xlsx Page 14 of 112 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Preliminary Cost Estimate
SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
27146.000
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE PER FT COST
1. Clear and Grub 69 SF $0.06 $4.14
2. Sawcut Asphalt Concrete 1 LF $1.50 $1.50
3. Remove Asphalt Concrete 7 SF $1.50 $10.50
4. Rough Grade Excavation 5.1 CY $5.00 $25.56
5. Roadway Excavation 1.8 CY $6.00 $10.80
6. Roadway Subgrade Preparation 31 SF $0.60 $18.60
7. 8" Asphalt Concrete Paving 27 SF $5.40 $145.80
8. 10" Aggregate Base 27 SF $2.90 $78.30
9. Curb & Gutter, Type 2 (Vertical Curb) 1 LF $33.40 $33.40
10. Median Curb, Type 3 (Barrier Curb) 2 LF $23.00 $46.00
11. Median Landscaping & Irrigation (Permanent) 13 SF $10.00 $130.00
12. Landscape Corridor Planting & Irrigation 18 SF $8.00 $144.00
13. 3-5/8" Concrete Sidewalk 7 SF $7.50 $52.50
14. Signing & Striping (2-lanes) 2 LF $1.50 $3.00
15. Erosion Control / SWPP 1 LF $20.62 $20.62
16. Dry Utility Joint Trench 1 LF $150.00 $150.00
17. Street Lights (Type A, 220' spacing, one side) 1 LF $42.00 $42.00
18. Traffic Signal Interconnect 1 LF $15.00 $15.00
19. 10" Water Distribution Line (Incl. Valves & Hydrants) 0 LF $160.00 $0.00
20. 18" Storm Drainage Line (Incl. MH's and DI's) 1 LF $235.00 $235.00
21. 8" Sewer Line (Incl. MH's) 0 LF $150.00 $0.00
Subtotal $1,166.72
Use $1,170
Note:
1 8"AC / 10" AB paving section based on existing Rancho Cordova Parkway paving .
Preliminary Cost Per Linear Foot
Rancho Cordova Parkway
(Half Section and Full Median)
Major Arterial - Street Section A
P:\27146\Admin\Estimates\SunCreek Finance Plan\SunCreek_Cost Estimate\Financing Plan EIR-EIS Estimate_2021.xlsx Page 15 of 112 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Preliminary Cost Estimate
SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
27146.000
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE PER FT COST
1. Clear and Grub 56 SF $0.06 $3.36
2. Rough Grade Excavation 4.1 CY $5.00 $20.74
3. Roadway Excavation 1.8 CY $6.00 $10.80
4. Roadway Subgrade Preparation 31 SF $0.60 $18.60
5. 8" Asphalt Concrete Paving 27 SF $5.40 $145.80
6. 10" Aggregate Base 27 SF $2.90 $78.30
7. Curb & Gutter, Type 2 (Vertical Curb) 2 LF $33.40 $66.80
8. Median Curb, Type 3 (Barrier Curb) 1 LF $23.00 $23.00
9. Landscape Corridor Planting & Irrigation 18 SF $8.00 $144.00
10. 3-5/8" Concrete Sidewalk 7 SF $7.50 $52.50
11. Signing & Striping (2-lanes) 2 LF $1.50 $3.00
12. Erosion Control / SWPP 1 LF $20.62 $20.62
13. Dry Utility Joint Trench 1 LF $150.00 $150.00
14. Street Lights (Type A, 220' spacing, both sides) 1 LF $84.00 $84.00
15. Traffic Signal Interconnect 1 LF $15.00 $15.00
16. 10" Water Distribution Line (Incl. Valves & Hydrants) 1 LF $160.00 $160.00
17. 18" Storm Drainage Line (Incl. MH's and DI's) 1 LF $235.00 $235.00
18. 8" Sewer Line (Incl. MH's) 0 LF $150.00 $0.00
Subtotal $1,231.53
Use $1,240
Note:
1 8"AC / 10" AB paving section based on existing Rancho Cordova Parkway paving .
Preliminary Cost Per Linear Foot
Rancho Cordova Parkway
(Half Section)
Major Arterial - Street Section B
P:\27146\Admin\Estimates\SunCreek Finance Plan\SunCreek_Cost Estimate\Financing Plan EIR-EIS Estimate_2021.xlsx Page 16 of 112 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Preliminary Cost Estimate
SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
27146.000
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE PER FT COST
1. Clear and Grub 71 SF $0.06 $4.26
2. Sawcut Asphalt Concrete 1 LF $1.50 $1.50
3. Remove Asphalt Concrete 9 SF $1.50 $13.50
4. Rough Grade Excavation 5.3 CY $5.00 $26.30
5. Roadway Excavation 2 CY $6.00 $12.00
6. Roadway Subgrade Preparation 31 SF $0.60 $18.60
7. 6" Asphalt Concrete Paving 28 SF $4.05 $113.40
8. 14" Aggregate Base 28 SF $4.03 $112.84
9. Curb & Gutter, Type 2 (Vertical Curb) 1 LF $33.40 $33.40
10. Median Curb, Type 3 (Barrier Curb) 2 LF $23.00 $46.00
11. Median Landscaping & Irrigation (Permanent) 13 SF $10.00 $130.00
12. Landscape Corridor Planting & Irrigation 21 SF $8.00 $168.00
13. 3-5/8" Concrete Sidewalk 0 SF $7.50 $0.00
14. Signing & Striping (2-lanes) 2 LF $1.50 $3.00
15. Erosion Control / SWPP 1 LF $20.62 $20.62
16. Dry Utility Joint Trench 1 LF $150.00 $150.00
17. Street Lights (Type A, 220' spacing, one side) 1 LF $42.00 $42.00
18. Traffic Signal Interconnect 1 LF $15.00 $15.00
19. 10" Water Distribution Line (Incl. Valves & Hydrants) 0 LF $160.00 $0.00
20. 18" Storm Drainage Line (Incl. MH's and DI's) 1 LF $235.00 $235.00
21. 8" Sewer Line (Incl. MH's) 0 LF $150.00 $0.00
Subtotal $1,145.42
Use $1,150
Note:
1 6"AC / 14" AB paving section based on existing Kiefer paving . 2 14' Trail cost captured in Section F. Park Corridor and Trails system Improvements Preliminary Cost Per Linear Foot
Kiefer Boulevard
(Half Section and Full Median)
Minor Arterial - Street Section C
P:\27146\Admin\Estimates\SunCreek Finance Plan\SunCreek_Cost Estimate\Financing Plan EIR-EIS Estimate_2021.xlsx Page 17 of 112 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Preliminary Cost Estimate
SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
27146.000
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE PER FT COST
1. Clear and Grub 71 SF $0.06 $4.26
2. Sawcut Asphalt Concrete 1 LF $1.50 $1.50
3. Remove Asphalt Concrete 9 SF $1.50 $13.50
4. Rough Grade Excavation 5.3 CY $5.00 $26.30
5. Roadway Excavation 2 CY $6.00 $12.00
6. Roadway Subgrade Preparation 31 SF $0.60 $18.60
7. 6" Asphalt Concrete Paving 28 SF $4.05 $113.40
8. 14" Aggregate Base 28 SF $4.03 $112.84
9. Curb & Gutter, Type 2 (Vertical Curb) 1 LF $33.40 $33.40
10. Median Curb, Type 3 (Barrier Curb) 2 LF $23.00 $46.00
11. Median Landscaping & Irrigation (Permanent) 13 SF $10.00 $130.00
12. Landscape Corridor Planting & Irrigation 19 SF $8.00 $152.00
13. 3-5/8" Concrete Sidewalk 0 SF $7.50 $0.00
14. Signing & Striping (2-lanes) 2 LF $1.50 $3.00
15. Erosion Control / SWPP 1 LF $20.62 $20.62
16. Dry Utility Joint Trench 1 LF $150.00 $150.00
17. Street Lights (Type A, 220' spacing, one side) 1 LF $42.00 $42.00
18. Traffic Signal Interconnect 1 LF $15.00 $15.00
19. 10" Water Distribution Line (Incl. Valves & Hydrants) 0 LF $160.00 $0.00
20. 18" Storm Drainage Line (Incl. MH's and DI's) 1 LF $235.00 $235.00
21. 8" Sewer Line (Incl. MH's) 0 LF $150.00 $0.00
Subtotal $1,129.42
Use $1,130
Note:
1 6"AC / 14" AB paving section based on existing Kiefer paving . 2 16' Trail cost captured in Section F. Park Corridor and Trails system Improvements Preliminary Cost Per Linear Foot
Kiefer Boulevard
(Half Section and Full Median)
Minor Arterial - Street Section D
P:\27146\Admin\Estimates\SunCreek Finance Plan\SunCreek_Cost Estimate\Financing Plan EIR-EIS Estimate_2021.xlsx Page 18 of 112 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Preliminary Cost Estimate
SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
27146.000
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE PER FT COST
1. Clear and Grub 50 SF $0.06 $3.00
2. Rough Grade Excavation 3.7 CY $5.00 $18.52
3. Roadway Excavation 2.2 CY $6.00 $13.20
4. Roadway Subgrade Preparation 35 SF $0.60 $21.00
5. 6" Asphalt Concrete Paving 32 SF $4.05 $129.60
6. 14" Aggregate Base 32 SF $4.03 $128.96
7. Curb & Gutter, Type 2 (Vertical Curb) 1 LF $33.40 $33.40
8. Landscape Corridor Planting & Irrigation 8 SF $8.00 $64.00
9. 3-5/8" Concrete Sidewalk 7 SF $7.50 $52.50
10. Signing & Striping (2-lanes) 2 LF $1.50 $3.00
11. Erosion Control / SWPP 1 LF $20.62 $20.62
12. Dry Utility Joint Trench 1 LF $150.00 $150.00
13. Street Lights (Type A, 220' spacing, one side) 1 LF $42.00 $42.00
14. Traffic Signal Interconnect 1 LF $15.00 $15.00
15. 10" Water Distribution Line (Incl. Valves & Hydrants) 0 LF $160.00 $0.00
16. 18" Storm Drainage Line (Incl. MH's and DI's) 1 LF $235.00 $235.00
17. 8" Sewer Line (Incl. MH's) 1 LF $150.00 $150.00
Subtotal $1,079.80
Use $1,080
Note:
1 6"AC / 14" AB paving section based on existing Kiefer paving .
Preliminary Cost Per Linear Foot
Kiefer Boulevard
(Half Section)
Minor Arterial - Street Section E
P:\27146\Admin\Estimates\SunCreek Finance Plan\SunCreek_Cost Estimate\Financing Plan EIR-EIS Estimate_2021.xlsx Page 19 of 112 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Preliminary Cost Estimate
SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
27146.000
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE PER FT COST
1. Clear and Grub 104 SF $0.06 $6.24
2. Rough Grade Excavation 7.7 CY $5.00 $38.52
3. Roadway Excavation 2.5 CY $6.00 $15.00
4. Roadway Subgrade Preparation 40 SF $0.60 $24.00
5. 6" Asphalt Concrete Paving 54 SF $4.05 $218.70
6. 14" Aggregate Base 54 SF $4.03 $217.62
7. Curb & Gutter, Type 2 (Vertical Curb) 2 LF $33.40 $66.80
8. Median Landscaping (Temporary) 21 SF $6.00 $126.00
9. Median Landscaping & Irrigation (Permanent) 13 SF $10.00 $130.00
10. Landscape Corridor Planting & Irrigation 16 SF $8.00 $128.00
11. 3-5/8" Concrete Sidewalk 14 SF $7.50 $105.00
12. Signing & Striping (4-lanes) 4 LF $1.50 $6.00
13. Erosion Control / SWPP 1 LF $20.62 $20.62
14. Dry Utility Joint Trench 1 LF $150.00 $150.00
15. Street Lights (Type A, 220' spacing, both sides) 1 LF $84.00 $84.00
16. Traffic Signal Interconnect 1 LF $15.00 $15.00
17. 10" Water Distribution Line (Incl. Valves & Hydrants) 1 LF $160.00 $160.00
18. 18" Storm Drainage Line (Incl. MH's and DI's) 1 LF $235.00 $235.00
19. 8" Sewer Line (Incl. MH's) 0 LF $150.00 $0.00
Subtotal $1,746.50
Use $1,750
Note:
1 6"AC / 14" AB paving section based on 2035 Transportation CIP Paving Section.
Preliminary Cost Per Linear Foot
Americanos Boulevard
(Interim Section)
Minor Arterial - Street Section F
P:\27146\Admin\Estimates\SunCreek Finance Plan\SunCreek_Cost Estimate\Financing Plan EIR-EIS Estimate_2021.xlsx Page 20 of 112 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Preliminary Cost Estimate
SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
27146.000
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE PER FT COST
1. Clear and Grub 144 SF $0.06 $8.64
2. Rough Grade Excavation 10.7 CY $5.00 $53.33
3. Roadway Excavation 2.5 CY $6.00 $15.00
4. Roadway Subgrade Preparation 40 SF $0.60 $24.00
5. 6" Asphalt Concrete Paving 34 SF $4.05 $137.70
6. 14" Aggregate Base 34 SF $4.03 $137.02
7. Curb & Gutter, Type 2 (Vertical Curb) 2 LF $33.40 $66.80
8. AC Dike (Type A) 2 SF $8.80 $17.60
9. Median Landscaping & Irrigation (Permanent) 13 SF $10.00 $130.00
10. Median Landscaping (Temporary) 19 SF $6.00 $114.00
11. Landscape Corridor Planting & Irrigation 47 SF $8.00 $376.00
12. 3-5/8" Concrete Sidewalk 7 SF $7.50 $52.50
13. Signing & Striping (4-lanes) 4 LF $1.50 $6.00
14. Erosion Control / SWPP 1 LF $20.62 $20.62
15. Dry Utility Joint Trench 1 LF $150.00 $150.00
16. Street Lights (Type A, 220' spacing, both sides) 1 LF $84.00 $84.00
17. Traffic Signal Interconnect 1 LF $15.00 $15.00
18. 10" Water Distribution Line (Incl. Valves & Hydrants) 1 LF $160.00 $160.00
19. 18" Storm Drainage Line (Incl. MH's and DI's) 1 LF $235.00 $235.00
20. 8" Sewer Line (Incl. MH's) 0 LF $150.00 $0.00
Subtotal $1,803.22
Use $1,810
Note:
1 6"AC / 14" AB paving section based on 2035 Transportation CIP Americanos Paving Section. 2 16' Trail cost captured in Section F. Park Corridor and Trails system Improvements Preliminary Cost Per Linear Foot
Americanos Boulevard
(Interim Section)
Minor Arterial - Street Section G
P:\27146\Admin\Estimates\SunCreek Finance Plan\SunCreek_Cost Estimate\Financing Plan EIR-EIS Estimate_2021.xlsx Page 21 of 112 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Preliminary Cost Estimate
SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
27146.000
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE PER FT COST
1. Clear and Grub 124 SF $0.06 $7.44
2. Rough Grade Excavation 9.2 CY $5.00 $45.93
3. Roadway Excavation 2.5 CY $6.00 $15.00
4. Roadway Subgrade Preparation 40 SF $0.60 $24.00
5. 6" Asphalt Concrete Paving 34 SF $4.05 $137.70
6. 14" Aggregate Base 34 SF $4.03 $137.02
7. Curb & Gutter, Type 2 (Vertical Curb) 2 LF $33.40 $66.80
8. AC Dike (Type A) 2 SF $8.80 $17.60
9. Median Landscaping & Irrigation (Permanent) 13 SF $10.00 $130.00
10. Median Landscaping (Temporary) 19 SF $6.00 $114.00
11. Landscape Corridor Planting & Irrigation 27 SF $8.00 $216.00
12. 3-5/8" Concrete Sidewalk 7 SF $7.50 $52.50
13. Signing & Striping (4-lanes) 4 LF $1.50 $6.00
14. Erosion Control / SWPP 1 LF $20.62 $20.62
15. Dry Utility Joint Trench 1 LF $150.00 $150.00
16. Street Lights (Type A, 220' spacing, both sides) 1 LF $84.00 $84.00
17. Traffic Signal Interconnect 1 LF $15.00 $15.00
18. 10" Water Distribution Line (Incl. Valves & Hydrants) 1 LF $160.00 $160.00
19. 18" Storm Drainage Line (Incl. MH's and DI's) 1 LF $235.00 $235.00
20. 8" Sewer Line (Incl. MH's) 0 LF $150.00 $0.00
Subtotal $1,634.61
Use $1,640
Note:
1 6"AC / 14" AB paving section based on 2035 Transportation CIP Americanos Paving Section. 2 16' Trail cost captured in Section F. Park Corridor and Trails system Improvements Preliminary Cost Per Linear Foot
Americanos Boulevard
(Interim Section)
Minor Arterial - Street Section H
P:\27146\Admin\Estimates\SunCreek Finance Plan\SunCreek_Cost Estimate\Financing Plan EIR-EIS Estimate_2021.xlsx Page 22 of 112 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Preliminary Cost Estimate
SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
27146.000
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE PER FT COST
1. Clear and Grub 50 SF $0.06 $3.00
2. Rough Grade Excavation 3.7 CY $5.00 $18.52
3. Roadway Excavation 2 CY $6.00 $12.00
4. Roadway Subgrade Preparation 32 SF $0.60 $19.20
5. 6" Asphalt Concrete Paving 32 SF $4.05 $129.60
6. 14" Aggregate Base 32 SF $4.03 $128.96
7. Curb & Gutter, Type 2 (Vertical Curb) 1 LF $33.40 $33.40
8. Landscape Corridor Planting & Irrigation 8 SF $8.00 $64.00
9. 3-5/8" Concrete Sidewalk 7 SF $7.50 $52.50
10. Signing & Striping (2-lanes) 2 LF $1.50 $3.00
11. Erosion Control / SWPP 1 LF $20.62 $20.62
12. Dry Utility Joint Trench 1 LF $150.00 $150.00
13. Street Lights (Type A, 220' spacing, one side) 1 LF $42.00 $42.00
14. Traffic Signal Interconnect 1 LF $15.00 $15.00
15. 10" Water Distribution Line (Incl. Valves & Hydrants) 1 LF $160.00 $160.00
16. 18" Storm Drainage Line (Incl. MH's and DI's) 1 LF $235.00 $235.00
17. 8" Sewer Line (Incl. MH's) 0 LF $150.00 $0.00
Subtotal $1,086.80
Use $1,090
Note:
1 6"AC / 14" AB paving section based on 2035 Transportation CIP Americanos Paving Section.
Preliminary Cost Per Linear Foot
Chrysanthy Boulevard
(Half Section)
Minor Arterial - Street Section I
P:\27146\Admin\Estimates\SunCreek Finance Plan\SunCreek_Cost Estimate\Financing Plan EIR-EIS Estimate_2021.xlsx Page 23 of 112 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Preliminary Cost Estimate
SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
27146.000
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE PER FT COST
1. Clear and Grub 36 SF $0.06 $2.16
2. Rough Grade Excavation 2.7 CY $5.00 $13.33
3. Roadway Excavation 1.3 CY $6.00 $7.80
4. Roadway Subgrade Preparation 14 SF $0.60 $8.40
5. 7" Asphalt Concrete Paving 14 SF $4.73 $66.15
6. 17" Aggregate Base 14 SF $4.93 $69.02
7. Curb & Gutter, Type 2 (Vertical Curb) 1 LF $33.40 $33.40
8. Median Curb, Type 3 (Barrier Curb) 1 LF $23.00 $23.00
9. Median Landscaping & Irrigation (Permanent) 0 SF $10.00 $0.00
10. Landscape Corridor Planting & Irrigation 0 SF $8.00 $0.00
11. 3-5/8" Concrete Sidewalk 6 SF $7.50 $45.00
12. Signing & Striping (1-lane) 1 LF $1.50 $1.50
13. Erosion Control / SWPP 1 LF $20.62 $20.62
14. Dry Utility Joint Trench 1 LF $150.00 $150.00
15. Street Lights (Type A, 220' spacing, one side) 1 LF $42.00 $42.00
16. Traffic Signal Interconnect 1 LF $15.00 $15.00
17. 10" Water Distribution Line (Incl. Valves & Hydrants) 0 LF $160.00 $0.00
18. 18" Storm Drainage Line (Incl. MH's and DI's) 1 LF $235.00 $235.00
19. 8" Sewer Line (Incl. MH's) 0 LF $150.00 $0.00
Subtotal $732.39
Use $740
Note:
1 7"AC / 17" AB paving section based on 2035 Transportation CIP Sunrise Paving Section.
Preliminary Cost Per Linear Foot
Sunrise Boulevard
(Half Section)
Major Arterial-Street Section K
P:\27146\Admin\Estimates\SunCreek Finance Plan\SunCreek_Cost Estimate\Financing Plan EIR-EIS Estimate_2021.xlsx Page 24 of 112 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Preliminary Cost Estimate
SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
27146.000
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE PER FT COST
1. Clear and Grub 43 SF $0.06 $2.58
2. Rough Grade Excavation 3.2 CY $5.00 $15.93
3. Roadway Excavation 1.3 CY $6.00 $7.80
4. Roadway Subgrade Preparation 14 SF $0.60 $8.40
5. 7" Asphalt Concrete Paving 14 SF $4.73 $66.15
6. 17" Aggregate Base 14 SF $4.93 $69.02
7. Curb & Gutter, Type 2 (Vertical Curb) 1 LF $33.40 $33.40
8. Landscape Corridor Planting & Irrigation 0 SF $8.00 $0.00
9. 3-5/8" Concrete Sidewalk 7 SF $7.50 $52.50
10. Signing & Striping (1-lane) 1 LF $1.50 $1.50
11. Erosion Control / SWPP 1 LF $20.62 $20.62
12. Dry Utility Joint Trench 1 LF $150.00 $150.00
13. Street Lights (Type A, 220' spacing, one side) 1 LF $42.00 $42.00
14. Traffic Signal Interconnect 1 LF $15.00 $15.00
15. 10" Water Distribution Line (Incl. Valves & Hydrants) 0 LF $160.00 $0.00
16. 18" Storm Drainage Line (Incl. MH's and DI's) 1 LF $235.00 $235.00
17. 8" Sewer Line (Incl. MH's) 0 LF $150.00 $0.00
Subtotal $719.90
Use $720
Note:
1 7"AC / 17" AB paving section based on 2035 Transportation CIP Sunrise Paving Section.
Preliminary Cost Per Linear Foot
Sunrise Boulevard
(Half Section)
Major Arterial-Street Section L
P:\27146\Admin\Estimates\SunCreek Finance Plan\SunCreek_Cost Estimate\Financing Plan EIR-EIS Estimate_2021.xlsx Page 25 of 112 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Preliminary Cost Estimate
SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
27146.000
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE PER FT COST
1. Clear and Grub 104 SF $0.06 $6.24
2. Rough Grade Excavation 7.7 CY $5.00 $38.52
3. Roadway Excavation 3.8 CY $6.00 $22.80
4. Roadway Subgrade Preparation 61 SF $0.60 $36.60
5. 6" Asphalt Concrete Paving 54 SF $4.05 $218.70
6. 14" Aggregate Base 54 SF $4.03 $217.62
7. Curb & Gutter, Type 2 (Vertical Curb) 2 LF $33.40 $66.80
8. Median Curb, Type 3 (Barrier Curb) 2 LF $23.00 $46.00
9. Median Landscaping & Irrigation (Permanent) 13 SF $10.00 $130.00
10. Landscape Corridor Planting & Irrigation 16 SF $8.00 $128.00
11. 3-5/8" Concrete Sidewalk 14 SF $7.50 $105.00
12. Signing & Striping (4-lanes) 4 LF $1.50 $6.00
13. Erosion Control / SWPP 1 LF $20.62 $20.62
14. Dry Utility Joint Trench 1 LF $150.00 $150.00
15. Street Lights (Type A, 220' spacing, both sides) 1 LF $84.00 $84.00
16. 10" Water Distribution Line (Incl. Valves & Hydrants) 1 LF $160.00 $160.00
17. 18" Storm Drainage Line (Incl. MH's and DI's) 1 LF $235.00 $235.00
18. 8" Sewer Line (Incl. MH's) 1 LF $150.00 $150.00
Subtotal $1,821.90
Use $1,830
Preliminary Cost Per Linear Foot
North Campus Road
(Full Section)
Minor Arterial-Street Section M
P:\27146\Admin\Estimates\SunCreek Finance Plan\SunCreek_Cost Estimate\Financing Plan EIR-EIS Estimate_2021.xlsx Page 26 of 112 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Preliminary Cost Estimate
SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
27146.000
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE PER FT COST
1. Clear and Grub 50 SF $0.06 $3.00
2. Rough Grade Excavation 3.7 CY $5.00 $18.52
3. Roadway Excavation 2 CY $6.00 $12.00
4. Roadway Subgrade Preparation 32 SF $0.60 $19.20
5. 6" Asphalt Concrete Paving 29 SF $4.05 $117.45
6. 14" Aggregate Base 29 SF $4.03 $116.87
7. Curb & Gutter, Type 2 (Vertical Curb) 1 LF $33.40 $33.40
8. Landscape Corridor Planting & Irrigation 8 SF $8.00 $64.00
9. 3-5/8" Concrete Sidewalk 7 SF $7.50 $52.50
10. Signing & Striping (2-lanes) 2 LF $1.50 $3.00
11. Erosion Control / SWPP 1 LF $20.62 $20.62
12. Dry Utility Joint Trench 1 LF $150.00 $150.00
13. Street Lights (Type A, 220' spacing, one side) 1 LF $42.00 $42.00
14. 10" Water Distribution Line (Incl. Valves & Hydrants) 1 LF $160.00 $160.00
15. 18" Storm Drainage Line (Incl. MH's and DI's) 1 LF $235.00 $235.00
16. 8" Sewer Line (Incl. MH's) 1 LF $150.00 $150.00
Subtotal $1,197.56
Use $1,200
Preliminary Cost Per Linear Foot
North Campus Road
(Half Section)
Minor Arterial-Street Section N
P:\27146\Admin\Estimates\SunCreek Finance Plan\SunCreek_Cost Estimate\Financing Plan EIR-EIS Estimate_2021.xlsx Page 27 of 112 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Preliminary Cost Estimate
SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
27146.000
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE PER FT COST
1. Clear and Grub 104 SF $0.06 $6.24
2. Rough Grade Excavation 7.7 CY $5.00 $38.52
3. Roadway Excavation 2 CY $6.00 $12.00
4. Roadway Subgrade Preparation 48 SF $0.60 $28.80
5. 4" Asphalt Concrete Paving 41 SF $2.70 $110.70
6. 9" Aggregate Base 41 SF $2.61 $107.01
7. Curb & Gutter, Type 2 (Vertical Curb) 2 LF $33.40 $66.80
8. Median Curb, Type 3 (Barrier Curb) 2 LF $23.00 $46.00
9. Median Landscaping & Irrigation (Permanent) 13 SF $10.00 $130.00
10. Landscape Corridor Planting & Irrigation 29 SF $8.00 $232.00
11. 3-5/8" Concrete Sidewalk 14 SF $7.50 $105.00
12. Signing & Striping (2-lanes) 2 LF $1.50 $3.00
13. Erosion Control / SWPP 1 LF $20.62 $20.62
14. Dry Utility Joint Trench 1 LF $150.00 $150.00
15. Street Lights (Type A, 220' spacing, both sides) 1 LF $84.00 $84.00
16. 10" Water Distribution Line (Incl. Valves & Hydrants) 1 LF $160.00 $160.00
17. 18" Storm Drainage Line (Incl. MH's and DI's) 1 LF $235.00 $235.00
18. 8" Sewer Line (Incl. MH's) 1 LF $150.00 $150.00
Subtotal $1,685.69
Use $1,690
Note:
1 West Park Drive paving section assumed to be 4" AC / 9" AB based on similar existing 2 lane collectors in Anatolia III.
Preliminary Cost Per Linear Foot
West Park Drive
(Full Section)
Minor Arterial-Street Section O
P:\27146\Admin\Estimates\SunCreek Finance Plan\SunCreek_Cost Estimate\Financing Plan EIR-EIS Estimate_2021.xlsx Page 28 of 112 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Preliminary Cost Estimate
SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
27146.000
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE PER FT COST
1. Clear and Grub 104 SF $0.06 $6.24
2. Rough Grade Excavation 7.7 CY $5.00 $38.52
3. Roadway Excavation 2.0 CY $6.00 $12.00
4. Roadway Subgrade Preparation 48 SF $0.60 $28.80
5. 4" Asphalt Concrete Paving 41 SF $2.70 $110.70
6. 9" Aggregate Base 41 SF $2.61 $107.01
7. Curb & Gutter, Type 2 (Vertical Curb) 2 LF $33.40 $66.80
8. Median Curb, Type 3 (Barrier Curb) 2 LF $23.00 $46.00
9. Median Landscaping & Irrigation (Permanent) 13 SF $10.00 $130.00
10. Landscape Corridor Planting & Irrigation 29 SF $8.00 $232.00
11. 3-5/8" Concrete Sidewalk 14 SF $7.50 $105.00
12. Signing & Striping (2-lanes) 2 LF $1.50 $3.00
13. Erosion Control / SWPP 1 LF $20.62 $20.62
14. Dry Utility Joint Trench 1 LF $150.00 $150.00
15. Street Lights (Type A, 220' spacing, both sides) 1 LF $84.00 $84.00
16. 10" Water Distribution Line (Incl. Valves & Hydrants) 0 LF $160.00 $0.00
17. 18" Storm Drainage Line (Incl. MH's and DI's) 1 LF $235.00 $235.00
18. 8" Sewer Line (Incl. MH's) 1 LF $150.00 $150.00
Subtotal $1,525.69
Use $1,530
Note:
1 Central Park Drive paving section assumed to be 4" AC / 9" AB based on similar existing 2 lane collectors in Anatolia III.
Preliminary Cost Per Linear Foot
Central Park Drive
(Full Section)
Collector Street-Street Section P
P:\27146\Admin\Estimates\SunCreek Finance Plan\SunCreek_Cost Estimate\Financing Plan EIR-EIS Estimate_2021.xlsx Page 29 of 112 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Preliminary Cost Estimate
SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
27146.000
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE PER FT COST
1. Clear and Grub 104 SF $0.06 $6.24
2. Rough Grade Excavation 7.7 CY $5.00 $38.52
3. Roadway Excavation 2 CY $6.00 $12.00
4. Roadway Subgrade Preparation 48 SF $0.60 $28.80
5. 4" Asphalt Concrete Paving 41 SF $2.70 $110.70
6. 9" Aggregate Base 41 SF $2.61 $107.01
7. Curb & Gutter, Type 2 (Vertical Curb) 2 LF $33.40 $66.80
8. Median Curb, Type 3 (Barrier Curb) 2 LF $23.00 $46.00
9. Median Landscaping & Irrigation (Permanent) 13 SF $10.00 $130.00
10. Landscape Corridor Planting & Irrigation 22 SF $8.00 $176.00
11. 3-5/8" Concrete Sidewalk 7 SF $7.50 $52.50
12. Signing & Striping (2-lanes) 2 LF $1.50 $3.00
13. Erosion Control / SWPP 1 LF $20.62 $20.62
14. Dry Utility Joint Trench 1 LF $150.00 $150.00
15. Street Lights (Type A, 220' spacing, both sides) 1 LF $84.00 $84.00
16. 10" Water Distribution Line (Incl. Valves & Hydrants) 0 LF $160.00 $0.00
17. 18" Storm Drainage Line (Incl. MH's and DI's) 1 LF $235.00 $235.00
18. 8" Sewer Line (Incl. MH's) 1 LF $150.00 $150.00
Subtotal $1,417.19
Use $1,420
Note:
1 Central Park Drive paving section assumed to be 4" AC / 9" AB based on similar existing 2 lane collectors in Anatolia III. 2 14' Trail cost captured in Section F. Park Corridor and Trails system Improvements Preliminary Cost Per Linear Foot
Central Park Drive
(Full Section)
Collector Street-Street Section Q
P:\27146\Admin\Estimates\SunCreek Finance Plan\SunCreek_Cost Estimate\Financing Plan EIR-EIS Estimate_2021.xlsx Page 30 of 112 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Preliminary Cost Estimate
SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
27146.000
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE PER FT COST
1. Clear and Grub 131 SF $0.06 $7.86
2. Rough Grade Excavation 9.7 CY $5.00 $48.52
3. Roadway Excavation 2 CY $6.00 $12.00
4. Roadway Subgrade Preparation 48 SF $0.60 $28.80
5. 4" Asphalt Concrete Paving 41 SF $2.70 $110.70
6. 9" Aggregate Base 41 SF $2.61 $107.01
7. Curb & Gutter, Type 2 (Vertical Curb) 2 LF $33.40 $66.80
8. Median Curb, Type 3 (Barrier Curb) 2 LF $23.00 $46.00
9. Median Landscaping & Irrigation (Permanent) 13 SF $10.00 $130.00
10. Landscape Corridor Planting & Irrigation 49 SF $8.00 $392.00
11. 3-5/8" Concrete Sidewalk 7 SF $7.50 $52.50
12. Signing & Striping (2-lanes) 2 LF $1.50 $3.00
13. Erosion Control / SWPP 1 LF $20.62 $20.62
14. Dry Utility Joint Trench 1 LF $150.00 $150.00
15. Street Lights (Type A, 220' spacing, both sides) 1 LF $84.00 $84.00
16. 10" Water Distribution Line (Incl. Valves & Hydrants) 0 LF $160.00 $0.00
17. 18" Storm Drainage Line (Incl. MH's and DI's) 1 LF $235.00 $235.00
18. 8" Sewer Line (Incl. MH's) 1 LF $150.00 $150.00
Subtotal $1,644.81
Use $1,650
Note:
1 Central Park Drive paving section assumed to be 4" AC / 9" AB based on similar existing 2 lane collectors in Anatolia III. 2 14' Trail cost captured in Section F. Park Corridor and Trails system Improvements Preliminary Cost Per Linear Foot
Central Park Drive
(Full Section)
Collector Street-Street Section R
P:\27146\Admin\Estimates\SunCreek Finance Plan\SunCreek_Cost Estimate\Financing Plan EIR-EIS Estimate_2021.xlsx Page 31 of 112 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Preliminary Cost Estimate
SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
27146.000
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE PER FT COST
1. Clear and Grub 118 SF $0.06 $7.08
2. Rough Grade Excavation 8.7 CY $5.00 $43.70
3. Roadway Excavation 2 CY $6.00 $12.00
4. Roadway Subgrade Preparation 48 SF $0.60 $28.80
5. 4" Asphalt Concrete Paving 41 SF $2.70 $110.70
6. 9" Aggregate Base 41 SF $2.61 $107.01
7. Curb & Gutter, Type 2 (Vertical Curb) 2 LF $33.40 $66.80
8. Median Curb, Type 3 (Barrier Curb) 2 LF $23.00 $46.00
9. Median Landscaping & Irrigation (Permanent) 13 SF $10.00 $130.00
10. Landscape Corridor Planting & Irrigation 33.5 SF $8.00 $268.00
11. 3-5/8" Concrete Sidewalk 7 SF $7.50 $52.50
12. Signing & Striping (2-lanes) 2 LF $1.50 $3.00
13. Erosion Control / SWPP 1 LF $20.62 $20.62
14. Dry Utility Joint Trench 1 LF $150.00 $150.00
15. Street Lights (Type A, 220' spacing, both sides) 1 LF $84.00 $84.00
16. 10" Water Distribution Line (Incl. Valves & Hydrants) 0 LF $160.00 $0.00
17. 18" Storm Drainage Line (Incl. MH's and DI's) 1 LF $235.00 $235.00
18. 8" Sewer Line (Incl. MH's) 1 LF $150.00 $150.00
Subtotal $1,515.22
Use $1,520
Note:
1 Central Park Drive paving section assumed to be 4" AC / 9" AB based on similar existing 2 lane collectors in Anatolia III. 2 16' Trail cost captured in Section F. Park Corridor and Trails system Improvements Preliminary Cost Per Linear Foot
Central Park Drive
(Full Section)
Collector Street-Street Section S
P:\27146\Admin\Estimates\SunCreek Finance Plan\SunCreek_Cost Estimate\Financing Plan EIR-EIS Estimate_2021.xlsx Page 32 of 112 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Preliminary Cost Estimate
SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
27146.000
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE PER FT COST
1. Clear and Grub 124,050 SF $0.06 $7,443.00
2. Rough Grade Excavation 9,189 CY $5.00 $45,944.44
3. Roadway Excavation 4,825 CY $6.00 $28,947.00
4. Roadway Subgrade Preparation 78,000 SF $0.60 $46,800.00
5. 6" Asphalt Concrete Paving 78,000 SF $4.05 $315,900.00
6. 14" Aggregate Base 78,000 SF $4.03 $314,340.00
7. Curb & Gutter, Type 2 (Vertical Curb) 2,000 LF $33.40 $66,800.00
8. Median Curb, Type 3 (Barrier Curb) 450 LF $23.00 $10,350.00
9. Median Landscaping & Irrigation (Permanent) 0 SF $10.00 $0.00
10. Landscape Corridor Planting & Irrigation 24,300 SF $8.00 $194,400.00
11. 3-5/8" Concrete Sidewalk 15,300 SF $7.50 $114,750.00
12. Signing & Striping (4-lanes) 3,600 LF $1.50 $5,400.00
13. Erosion Control / SWPP 1,500 LF $20.62 $30,936.60
14. Dry Utility Joint Trench 1,500 LF $150.00 $225,000.00
15. Street Lights (Type A, 220' spacing, one side) 1,500 LF $42.00 $63,000.00
16. Traffic Signal Interconnect 1,500 LF $15.00 $22,500.00
17. 10" Water Distribution Line (Incl. Valves & Hydrants) 500 LF $160.00 $80,000.00
18. 18" Storm Drainage Line (Incl. MH's and DI's) 1,500 LF $235.00 $352,500.00
19. 8" Sewer Line (Incl. MH's) 1,000 LF $150.00 $150,000.00 Subtotal $2,075,011.04
Use $2,075,020
Preliminary Cost Per Linear Foot
Kiefer Blvd & Americanos Blvd - Intersection T
Modified 4x2 Tee
P:\27146\Admin\Estimates\SunCreek Finance Plan\SunCreek_Cost Estimate\Financing Plan EIR-EIS Estimate_2021.xlsx Page 33 of 112 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Preliminary Cost Estimate
SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
27146.000
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE PER FT COST
1. Clear and Grub 30,225 SF $0.06 $1,813.50
2. Rough Grade Excavation 2,239 CY $5.00 $11,194.44
3. Roadway Excavation 1,137 CY $6.00 $6,819.60
4. Roadway Subgrade Preparation 18,375 SF $0.60 $11,025.00
5. 6" Asphalt Concrete Paving 18,375 SF $4.05 $74,418.75
6. 14" Aggregate Base 18,375 SF $4.03 $74,051.25
7. Curb & Gutter, Type 2 (Vertical Curb) 900 LF $33.40 $30,060.00
8. Median Curb, Type 3 (Barrier Curb) 450 LF $23.00 $10,350.00
9. Median Landscaping & Irrigation (Permanent) 0 SF $10.00 $0.00
10. Landscape Corridor Planting & Irrigation 6,000 SF $8.00 $48,000.00
11. 3-5/8" Concrete Sidewalk 2,700 SF $7.50 $20,250.00
12. Signing & Striping (4-lanes) 1,500 LF $1.50 $2,250.00
13. Erosion Control / SWPP 1,000 LF $20.62 $20,624.40
14. Dry Utility Joint Trench 900 LF $150.00 $135,000.00
15. Street Lights (Type A, 220' spacing, one side) 900 LF $42.00 $37,800.00
16. Traffic Signal Interconnect 900 LF $15.00 $13,500.00
17. 10" Water Distribution Line (Incl. Valves & Hydrants) 0 LF $160.00 $0.00
18. 18" Storm Drainage Line (Incl. MH's and DI's) 900 LF $235.00 $211,500.00
19. 8" Sewer Line (Incl. MH's) 0 LF $150.00 $0.00
Subtotal $708,656.94
Use $708,660
Preliminary Cost Per Linear Foot
Kiefer Blvd and Sunrise Blvd - Intersection U
Modified 4x6 Intersection
P:\27146\Admin\Estimates\SunCreek Finance Plan\SunCreek_Cost Estimate\Financing Plan EIR-EIS Estimate_2021.xlsx Page 34 of 112 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Preliminary Cost Estimate
SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
27146.000
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE PER FT COST
1. Clear and Grub 62,150 SF $0.06 $3,729.00
2. Rough Grade Excavation 4,604 CY $5.00 $23,018.52
3. Roadway Excavation 2,536 CY $6.00 $15,216.00
4. Roadway Subgrade Preparation 41,000 SF $0.60 $24,600.00
5. 6" Asphalt Concrete Paving 41,000 SF $4.05 $166,050.00
6. 14" Aggregate Base 41,000 SF $4.03 $165,230.00
7. Curb & Gutter, Type 2 (Vertical Curb) 900 LF $33.40 $30,060.00
8. Median Curb, Type 3 (Barrier Curb) 450 LF $23.00 $10,350.00
9. Median Landscaping & Irrigation (Permanent) 0 SF $10.00 $0.00
10. Landscape Corridor Planting & Irrigation 11,700 SF $8.00 $93,600.00
11. 3-5/8" Concrete Sidewalk 6,300 SF $7.50 $47,250.00
12. Signing & Striping (2-lanes) 2 LF $1.50 $3.00
13. Erosion Control / SWPP 900 LF $20.62 $18,561.96
14. Dry Utility Joint Trench 900 LF $150.00 $135,000.00
15. Street Lights (Type A, 220' spacing, one side) 900 LF $42.00 $37,800.00
16. Traffic Signal Interconnect 900 LF $15.00 $13,500.00
17. 10" Water Distribution Line (Incl. Valves & Hydrants) 900 LF $160.00 $144,000.00
18. 18" Storm Drainage Line (Incl. MH's and DI's) 1,800 LF $235.00 $423,000.00
19. 8" Sewer Line (Incl. MH's) 900 LF $150.00 $135,000.00 Subtotal $1,485,968.48
Use $1,485,970
Preliminary Cost Per Linear Foot
Rancho Cordova Pkwy & Kiefer Blvd- Intersection V-PH1
Modified 4x4 Intersection
P:\27146\Admin\Estimates\SunCreek Finance Plan\SunCreek_Cost Estimate\Financing Plan EIR-EIS Estimate_2021.xlsx Page 35 of 112 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Preliminary Cost Estimate
SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
27146.000
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE PER FT COST
1. Clear and Grub 62,000 SF $0.06 $3,720.00
2. Rough Grade Excavation 4,593 CY $5.00 $22,962.96
3. Roadway Excavation 2,412 CY $6.00 $14,473.80
4. Roadway Subgrade Preparation 39,000 SF $0.60 $23,400.00
5. 6" Asphalt Concrete Paving 39,000 SF $4.05 $157,950.00
6. 14" Aggregate Base 39,000 SF $4.03 $157,170.00
7. Curb & Gutter, Type 2 (Vertical Curb) 1,000 LF $33.40 $33,400.00
8. Median Curb, Type 3 (Barrier Curb) 2,000 LF $23.00 $46,000.00
9. Landscape Corridor Planting & Irrigation 11,700 SF $8.00 $93,600.00
10. 3-5/8" Concrete Sidewalk 6,300 SF $7.50 $47,250.00
11. Signing & Striping (2-lanes) 4 LF $1.50 $6.00
12. Erosion Control / SWPP 900 LF $20.62 $18,561.96
13. Dry Utility Joint Trench 900 LF $150.00 $135,000.00
14. Street Lights (Type A, 220' spacing, one side) 900 LF $42.00 $37,800.00
15. Traffic Signal Interconnect 900 LF $15.00 $13,500.00
16. 10" Water Distribution Line (Incl. Valves & Hydrants) 900 LF $160.00 $144,000.00
17. 18" Storm Drainage Line (Incl. MH's and DI's) 1,800 LF $235.00 $423,000.00
18. 8" Sewer Line (Incl. MH's) 900 LF $150.00 $135,000.00 Subtotal $1,506,794.72
Use $1,506,800
Preliminary Cost Per Linear Foot
Rancho Cordova Pkwy & Kiefer Blvd- Intersection V-Ph2
Modified 4x4 Intersection
P:\27146\Admin\Estimates\SunCreek Finance Plan\SunCreek_Cost Estimate\Financing Plan EIR-EIS Estimate_2021.xlsx Page 36 of 112 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Preliminary Cost Estimate
SunCreek Plan Area Specific Plan
Proposed Project Backbone Infrastructure
27146.000
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE PER FT COST
1. Clear and Grub 109,850 SF $0.06 $6,591.00
2. Rough Grade Excavation 8,137 CY $5.00 $40,685.19
3. Roadway Excavation 5,010 CY $6.00 $30,060.00
4. Roadway Subgrade Preparation 81,000 SF $0.60 $48,600.00
5. 6" Asphalt Concrete Paving 81,000 SF $4.05 $328,050.00
6. 14" Aggregate Base 81,000 SF $4.03 $326,430.00
7. Curb & Gutter, Type 2 (Vertical Curb) 1,000 LF $33.40 $33,400.00
8. Median Curb, Type 3 (Barrier Curb) 2,000 LF $23.00 $46,000.00
9. Landscape Corridor Planting & Irrigation 14,400 SF $8.00 $115,200.00
10. 3-5/8" Concrete Sidewalk 9,450 SF $7.50 $70,875.00
11. Signing & Striping (4-lanes) 3,600 LF $1.50 $5,400.00
12. Erosion Control / SWPP 1,500 LF $20.62 $30,936.60
13. Dry Utility Joint Trench 1,500 LF $150.00 $225,000.00
14. Street Lights (Type A, 220' spacing, one side) 1,500 LF $42.00 $63,000.00
15. Traffic Signal Interconnect 1,500 LF $15.00 $22,500.00
16. 10" Water Distribution Line (Incl. Valves & Hydrants) 1,350 LF $160.00 $216,000.00
17. 18" Storm Drainage Line (Incl. MH's and DI's) 1,350 LF $235.00 $317,250.00
18. 8" Sewer Line (Incl. MH's) 0 LF $150.00 $0.00
Subtotal $1,925,977.79
Use $1,925,980
Preliminary Cost Per Linear Foot
Chrysanthy & Americanos Blvd - Intersection W
Modified 4x4 Tee
P:\27146\Admin\Estimates\SunCreek Finance Plan\SunCreek_Cost Estimate\Financing Plan EIR-EIS Estimate_2021.xlsx Page 37 of 112 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution