Rancho Cucamonga City Council
June 3, 2026

1869 ALL 452883.2 3773722 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.56E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.56E-04 1870 ALL 452903.2 3773722 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.57E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.57E-04 1871 ALL 452923.2 3773722 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.58E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.58E-04 1872 ALL 452943.2 3773722 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.59E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.59E-04 1873 ALL 452963.2 3773722 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.60E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.60E-04 1874 ALL 452983.2 3773722 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.62E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.62E-04 1875 ALL 453003.2 3773722 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.63E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.63E-04 1876 ALL 453023.2 3773722 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.64E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.64E-04 1877 ALL 453043.2 3773722 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.65E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.65E-04 1878 ALL 453063.2 3773722 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.67E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.67E-04 1879 ALL 453083.2 3773722 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.68E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.68E-04 1880 ALL 453103.2 3773722 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.70E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.70E-04 1881 ALL 451703.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.09E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.09E-04 1882 ALL 451723.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.09E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.09E-04 1883 ALL 451743.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.11E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.11E-04 1884 ALL 451763.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.12E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.12E-04 1885 ALL 451783.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.13E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.13E-04 1886 ALL 451803.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.14E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.14E-04 1887 ALL 451823.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.14E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.14E-04 1888 ALL 451843.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.15E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.15E-04 1889 ALL 451863.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.15E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.15E-04 1890 ALL 451883.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.15E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.15E-04 1891 ALL 451903.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.16E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.16E-04 1892 ALL 451923.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.16E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.16E-04 1893 ALL 451943.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.17E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.17E-04 1894 ALL 451963.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.18E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.18E-04 1895 ALL 451983.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.19E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.19E-04 1896 ALL 452003.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.20E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.20E-04 1897 ALL 452023.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.20E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.20E-04 1898 ALL 452043.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.21E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.21E-04 1899 ALL 452063.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.22E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.22E-04 1900 ALL 452083.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.24E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.24E-04 1901 ALL 452103.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.27E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.27E-04 1902 ALL 452123.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.30E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.30E-04 1903 ALL 452143.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.33E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.33E-04 1904 ALL 452163.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.34E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.34E-04 1905 ALL 452183.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.35E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.35E-04 1906 ALL 452203.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.37E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.37E-04 1907 ALL 452223.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.39E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.39E-04 1908 ALL 452243.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.41E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.41E-04 1909 ALL 452263.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.42E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.42E-04 1910 ALL 452283.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.42E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.42E-04 1911 ALL 452303.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.42E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.42E-04 1912 ALL 452323.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.43E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.43E-04 1913 ALL 452343.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.43E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.43E-04 1914 ALL 452363.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.43E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.43E-04 1915 ALL 452383.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.44E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.44E-04 1916 ALL 452403.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.44E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.44E-04 1917 ALL 452423.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.44E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.44E-04 1918 ALL 452443.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.44E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.44E-04 1919 ALL 452463.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.43E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.43E-04 1920 ALL 452483.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.44E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.44E-04 1921 ALL 452503.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.44E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.44E-04 1922 ALL 452603.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.46E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.46E-04 1923 ALL 452623.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.47E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.47E-04

1924 ALL 452643.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.47E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.47E-04 1925 ALL 452663.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.48E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.48E-04 1926 ALL 452683.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.48E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.48E-04 1927 ALL 452703.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.48E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.48E-04 1928 ALL 452723.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.48E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.48E-04 1929 ALL 452743.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.48E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.48E-04 1930 ALL 452763.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.48E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.48E-04 1931 ALL 452783.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.49E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.49E-04 1932 ALL 452803.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.49E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.49E-04 1933 ALL 452823.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.49E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.49E-04 1934 ALL 452843.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.50E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.50E-04 1935 ALL 452863.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.50E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.50E-04 1936 ALL 452883.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.50E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.50E-04 1937 ALL 452903.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.51E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.51E-04 1938 ALL 452923.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.52E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.52E-04 1939 ALL 452943.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.53E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.53E-04 1940 ALL 452963.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.54E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.54E-04 1941 ALL 452983.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.55E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.55E-04 1942 ALL 453003.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.56E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.56E-04 1943 ALL 453023.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.57E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.57E-04 1944 ALL 453043.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.58E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.58E-04 1945 ALL 453063.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.60E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.60E-04 1946 ALL 453083.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.61E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.61E-04 1947 ALL 453103.2 3773742 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.63E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.63E-04 1948 ALL 451703.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.05E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.05E-04 1949 ALL 451723.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.06E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.06E-04 1950 ALL 451743.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.07E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.07E-04 1951 ALL 451763.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.08E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.08E-04 1952 ALL 451783.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.09E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.09E-04 1953 ALL 451803.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.10E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.10E-04 1954 ALL 451823.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.11E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.11E-04 1955 ALL 451843.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.11E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.11E-04 1956 ALL 451863.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.11E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.11E-04 1957 ALL 451883.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.12E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.12E-04 1958 ALL 451903.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.12E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.12E-04 1959 ALL 451923.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.12E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.12E-04 1960 ALL 451943.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.13E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.13E-04 1961 ALL 451963.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.14E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.14E-04 1962 ALL 451983.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.15E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.15E-04 1963 ALL 452003.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.15E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.15E-04 1964 ALL 452023.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.16E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.16E-04 1965 ALL 452043.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.16E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.16E-04 1966 ALL 452063.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.17E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.17E-04 1967 ALL 452083.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.18E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.18E-04 1968 ALL 452103.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.21E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.21E-04 1969 ALL 452123.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.24E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.24E-04 1970 ALL 452143.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.27E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.27E-04 1971 ALL 452163.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.29E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.29E-04 1972 ALL 452183.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.30E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.30E-04 1973 ALL 452203.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.31E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.31E-04 1974 ALL 452223.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.33E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.33E-04 1975 ALL 452243.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.34E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.34E-04 1976 ALL 452263.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.36E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.36E-04 1977 ALL 452283.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.37E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.37E-04 1978 ALL 452303.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.37E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.37E-04

1979 ALL 452323.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.38E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.38E-04 1980 ALL 452343.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.38E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.38E-04 1981 ALL 452363.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.38E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.38E-04 1982 ALL 452383.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.39E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.39E-04 1983 ALL 452403.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.39E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.39E-04 1984 ALL 452423.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.39E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.39E-04 1985 ALL 452443.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.39E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.39E-04 1986 ALL 452463.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.39E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.39E-04 1987 ALL 452483.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.39E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.39E-04 1988 ALL 452503.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.39E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.39E-04 1989 ALL 452603.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.41E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.41E-04 1990 ALL 452623.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.42E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.42E-04 1991 ALL 452643.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.42E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.42E-04 1992 ALL 452663.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.42E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.42E-04 1993 ALL 452683.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.43E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.43E-04 1994 ALL 452703.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.43E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.43E-04 1995 ALL 452723.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.43E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.43E-04 1996 ALL 452743.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.43E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.43E-04 1997 ALL 452763.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.43E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.43E-04 1998 ALL 452783.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.43E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.43E-04 1999 ALL 452803.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.44E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.44E-04 2000 ALL 452823.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.44E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.44E-04 2001 ALL 452843.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.44E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.44E-04 2002 ALL 452863.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.44E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.44E-04 2003 ALL 452883.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.45E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.45E-04 2004 ALL 452903.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.46E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.46E-04 2005 ALL 452923.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.46E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.46E-04 2006 ALL 452943.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.47E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.47E-04 2007 ALL 452963.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.48E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.48E-04 2008 ALL 452983.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.48E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.48E-04 2009 ALL 453003.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.49E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.49E-04 2010 ALL 453023.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.51E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.51E-04 2011 ALL 453043.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.52E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.52E-04 2012 ALL 453063.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.53E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.53E-04 2013 ALL 453083.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.54E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.54E-04 2014 ALL 453103.2 3773762 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilkCrops0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.55E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.55E-04

9.14E-03

Attachment B
Biological Resources Technical Memorandum

Attachment C
Archaeological Resources Assessment

January 19, 2023 14933
Mr. Kevin Rice
Patriot Development Partners
12126 West Sunset Boulevard
Los Angeles, California 90094
Subject: Draft Archaeological Resources Assessment for the Whittram Avenue Warehouse Project , City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California
Dear Mr. Kevin Rice:

This letter documents the archaeological resources assessment conducted by Dudek for the Whittram Avenue Warehouse Project (Project or proposed Project ), located within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California. The present study documents the results of a California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) records search conducted at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC), an archaeological pedestrian survey, an analysis regarding the potential for archaeological resources to be present , as well as management recommendations. The City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) is the lead agency responsible for compliance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Project Location
The proposed Project site is located on the south side of Whittram Avenue between Etiwanda Avenue and Pecan Street within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California. Specifically, the proposed Project site is located within public land survey system (PLSS) Section 9 of Township 1 South, Range 6 West on the Guasti, California 7.5-minute USGS Quadrangle (Appendix A: Figure 1 ). The proposed Project site is located on f five (5) parcels (Assessor Parcel Num bers [APNs] 022-916-204, 022-916-205, 022-916-211, 022-916-212, and 022 - 916-213) and is bounded to the north by Whittram Avenue, to the west by East Etiwanda Creek, to the east by commercial uses, and to the south by the Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad (Appendix A: Figure 2).

Project Description
The proposed Project includes the construction of one industrial building totaling 86, 194 square feet on a 5.21 - acre parcel. However, due to easements and other constraints, the proposed Project would only be constructed on a 4.11-acre portion of the 5.21 -acre property, which consists of APN 022-916-205. Additionally, the proposed Project would involve utility connections to existing infrastructure surrounding the site.

Based on a review of the current geotechnical report prepared for the proposed Project and the recommendations provided therein (NorCal Engineering 202 1), site preparation activities include removal of all veget ation and/or demolition debris, disturbed and/or fill soils, scarification of the exposed native soils to a depth of 12 inches, and

TO: MR. KEVIN RICE
SUBJECT: DRAFT ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE WHITTRAM AVENUE WAREHOUSE PROJECT,

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

14933 2 JANUARY 2023
utility connection work. In consideration of these factors, the assumed depths of ground disturbance associated with the proposed Project construction is no greater than 7 feet below existing ground surface.

Environmental Setting
The proposed Project site is within California’s Transverse Ranges geomorphic province, which is defined by an east-west trending series of steep mountain ranges and valleys (California Geological Survey 2002). The transverse ranges include the Santa Ana Mountains to the southwest, the San Jacinto Mountains to the southeast, and the San Gabriel and San Bernardino Mountains to the north. The proposed Project site is over 5 miles south of the San Gabriel Mountains, over 8 miles southwest of the San Bernardino Mountains, approximately 17 miles northeast of the Santa Ana Mountains and the Jurupa Hills are located over 4 miles southeast of the proposed Pr oject site.

Waterways in the immediate and general vicinity include East Etiwanda Creek borders, which the northwest quadrant and overlaps the southwest quadrant of proposed Project site, the confluence of Lytle Creek Wash and Cajon Wash is over 9 miles to the northeast, and the Santa Ana River is over 8 miles to the south.

According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey (USDA 2022a), soils within the proposed Project site consis ts of Tujunga loamy sand with 0 to 9 percent slopes. This soils series is described below according the official soil description (USDA 2022b):

Tujunga Series: Characterized as very deep, somewhat excessively drained soils that formed in alluvium from granitic sources. This soils series is found on alluvial fans and floodplains, including urban areas and consists of slopes ranging from 0 to 12 percent. A typical Tujunga series pedon extends approximately 6.5 feet below ground surface (bgs).

A review of the United States Geological Society (USGS) mineral resources (USGS 2022) online spatial data for geology indicates that native soils within the proposed Project site are comprised of Older Quaternary alluvium and marine deposits from the Pleistocene epoch. The terminal Pleistocene-era alluvial formations do have the potential to support the presence of buried archaeological resources. These soils are associated with the period of prehistoric human use that have potential to preserve cultural material in conte xt, depending on area-specific topographical setting.

Presently, the majority of the proposed Project is undeveloped and includes APNs 022-916-204 and 022-916-205, though the northeast corner of APN 022-916-205 consists of an existing single -family home an d associated improvements. Additionally, the parcels that make up the northwest corner of the proposed Project site, APNs 022- 916-211, 022-916-212, and 022-916-213, consists of an existing building, a paved lot used for storage of vehicles.

The proposed Project site is relatively flat with elevation ranging between 1,117 and 1,132 feet above mean sea level (Google 2022).

Regulatory Context
Work for this Project was conducted in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The regulatory framework as it pertains to cultural resources under CEQA is detailed below.

TO: MR. KEVIN RICE
SUBJECT: DRAFT ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE WHITTRAM AVENUE WAREHOUSE PROJECT,

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

14933 3 JANUARY 2023
Under the provisions of CEQA, including the CEQA Statutes (PRC Sections 21083.2 and 21084.1), the CEQA Guidelines (14 CCR 15064.5), and California Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 5024.1 (14 CCR 4850 et seq.), properties expected to be directly or indirectly affected by a proposed project must be evaluated for California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) eligibility (PRC Section 5024.1).

The purpose of the CRHR is to maintain listings of the state’s historical resources and to indicate which properties are to be protected, to the extent prudent and feasible, from material impairment and substantial adverse change. The term historical resources include a resource listed in or determined to be eligible for listing in the CRHR; a resource included in a local register of historical resources; and any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript that a lead agency determines to be historically significant (14 CCR 15064.5[a]). The criteria for listing properties in the CRHR were developed in accordance with previously established criteria developed for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. The California Office of Historic Preservation regards “any physical evidence of human activities over 45 years old” as meriting recordation and evaluation (OHP 1995:2).

State
The Califor nia Register of Historical Resources
A cultural resource is considered “historically significant” under CEQA if the resource meets one or more of the criteria for listing on the CRHR. The CRHR was designed to be used by state and local agencies, private groups, and citizens to identify existing cultural resources within the state and to indicate which of those resources should be protected, to the extent prudent and feasible, from substantial adverse change. The following criteria have been established for the CRHR. A resource is considered significant if it:

1. is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage;

2. is associated with the lives of persons important in our past;

3. embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values; or

4. has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.

In addition to meeting one or more of the above criteria, historical resources eligible for listing in the CRHR must retain enough of their historic character or appearance to be able to convey the reasons for their significance. Such integrity is evaluated in regard to the retention of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association.

Under CEQA, if an archeological site is not a historical resource but meets the definition of a “unique archeological resource” as defined in PRC Section 21083.2, then it should be treated in accordance with the provisions of that section. A unique archaeological resource is defined as follows:
• An archaeological artifact, object, or site about which it can be clea rly demonstrated that, without merely adding to the current body of knowledge, there is a high probability that it meets any of the following criteria:
o Contains information needed to answer important scientific research questions and that there is a demonstrable public interest in that information
o Has a special and particular quality, such as being the oldest of its type or the best available example of its type

TO: MR. KEVIN RICE
SUBJECT: DRAFT ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE WHITTRAM AVENUE WAREHOUSE PROJECT,

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

14933 4 JANUARY 2023
o Is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person Resources that neither meet any of these criteria for listing in the CRHR nor qualify as a “unique archaeological resource” under CEQA (PRC Section 21083.2) are viewed as not significant. Under CEQA, “A non -unique archaeological resource need be given no further consideration, other than the simple recording of its existence by the lead agency if it so elects” (PRC Section 21083.2[h]).

Impacts that adversely alter the significance of a resource listed in or eligible for listing in the CRHR are considered a significant effect on the environment. Impacts to historical resources from a proposed project are thus considered significant if the project (1) physically destroys or damages all or part of a resource; (2) changes the character of the use of the resource or physical feature within the setting of the resource, which contributes to its significance; or (3) introduces visual, atmospheric, or audible elements that diminish the integrity of significant features of the resource.

California Environ mental Quality Act
As described further, the following CEQA statutes (PRC Section 21000 et seq.) and CEQA Guidelines (14 CCR 15000 et seq.) are of relevance to the analysis of archaeological, historic, and tribal cultural resources:
▪ PRC Section 21083.2(g) defines “unique archaeological resource.” ▪ PRC Section 21084.1 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a) defines “historical resources.” In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(b) defines the phrase “substantial adverse change in the significance of an hi storical resource ;” it also defines the circumstances when a project would materially impair the significance of a historical resource.
▪ PRC Section 21074(a) defines “tribal cultural resources.” ▪ PRC Section 5097.98 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(e) set forth standards and steps to be employed following the accidental discovery of human remains in any location other than a dedicated ceremony. ▪ PRC Sections 21083.2(b) and 21083.2(c) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.4 provide information regarding the mit igation framework for archaeological and historic resources, including examples of preservation-in-place mitigation measures. Preservation in place is the preferred manner of mitigating impacts to significant archaeological sites because it maintains the relationship between artifacts and the archaeological context and may also help avoid conflict with religious or cultural values of groups associated with the archaeological site(s).

More specifically, under CEQA, a project may have a significant effect on the environment if it may cause “a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource” (PRC Section 21084.1; CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(b)). If a site is listed or eligible for listing in the CRHR, or included in a local registe r of historic resources, or identified as significant in a historical resources survey (meeting the requirements of PRC Section 5024.1(q)), it is an “historical resource” and is presumed to be historically or culturally significant for purposes of CEQA (PR C Section 21084.1; CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a)). The lead agency is not precluded from determining that a resource is a historical resource even if it does not fall within this presumption (PRC Section 21084.1; CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a)).

A “substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource” reflecting a significant effect under CEQA means “physical demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration of the resource or its immediate surroundings such that the significance of an historical resource would be materially impaired” (CEQA Guidelines

TO: MR. KEVIN RICE
SUBJECT: DRAFT ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE WHITTRAM AVENUE WAREHOUSE PROJECT,

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

14933 5 JANUARY 2023
Section 15064.5(b)(1); PRC Section 5020.1(q)). In turn, the significance of a historical resource is materially impaired when a project does any of the following:
(1) Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics of an historical resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its inclusion in, or eligibility for, inclusion in the California Register; or
(2) Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics that account for its inclusion in a local register of historical resources pursuant to Section 5020.1(k) of the PRC or its identification in an historical resources survey meeting the requirements of Section 5024.1(g) of the PRC, unless the public agency reviewing the effects of the project establishes by a preponderance of evidence that the resource is not historically or culturally significant; or (3) Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics of a historical resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its eligibility for inclusion in the California Register as determined by a lead agency for purposes of CEQA (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(b)(2)).

Pursuant to these sections, the CEQA inquiry begins with evaluating whether a project site contains any “historical resources,” then evaluates whether that project will cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource such that the resource’s historical significance is materially impaired.

If it can be demonstrated that a project will cause damage to a unique archaeological resource, the lead agency may require reasonable efforts be made to permit any or all of these resources to be preserved in place or left in an undisturbed state. To the extent that they cannot be left undisturbed, mitigation measures are required (PRC Sections 21083.2(a)–(c)).

Section 21083.2(g) defines a unique archaeologi cal resource as an archaeological artifact, object, or site about which it can be clearly demonstrated that without merely adding to the current body of knowledge, there is a high probability that it meets any of the following criteria:
(1) Contains infor mation needed to answer important scientific research questions and that there is a demonstrable public interest in that information.
(2) Has a special and particular quality such as being the oldest of its type or the best available example of its type. (3) Is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person (PRC Section 21083.2(g)).

Impacts on nonunique archaeological resources are generally not considered a significant environmental impact (PRC Section 21083.2(a); CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(c)(4)). However, if a nonunique archaeological resource qualifies as a TCR (PRC Sections 21074(c) and 21083.2(h)), further consideration of significant impacts is required.

CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5 assigns special importance to human remains and specifies procedures to be used when Native American remains are discovered. As described below, these procedures are detailed in PRC Section 5097.98.

TO: MR. KEVIN RICE
SUBJECT: DRAFT ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE WHITTRAM AVENUE WAREHOUSE PROJECT,

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

14933 6 JANUARY 2023
California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5
California law protects Native American burials, skeletal remains, and associated grave goods, regardless of their antiquity, and provides for the sensitive treatment and disposition of those remains. California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 requires that if human remains are discovered in any place other than a dedicated cemetery, no further disturbance or excavation of the site or nearby area reasonably suspected to contain human remains shall occur until the county coroner has examined the remains (Section 7050.5(b)). PRC Section 5097.98 also outlines the process to be followed in the event that remains are discovered. If the coroner determines or has reason to believe the remains are those of a Native American, the coroner must contact NAHC within 24 hours (Section 7050.5(c)). NAHC will notify the “most likely descendant.” With the permission of the landowner, the most likely descendant may inspect the site of discovery. The inspection must be completed within 48 hours of notification of the most likely descendant by NAHC. The most likely descendant may recommend means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains, and items associated with Native Americans.

Local
PlanRC: City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update – Adopted Dec ember 2021 PlanRC represents the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s comprehensive General Plan update, as informed by the approved General Plan EIR. PlanRC was adopted December 15, 2021 and includes goals, policies, and implementation strategies to guide future de velopment. There are four volumes within PlanRC and of these, two volumes address cultural and tribal cultural resources: Volume 3, Environmental Performance and Volume 4, Implementation Strategy. The volumes that address cultural and tribal cultural resou rces are provided below as documented in the PlanRC.

Volume 3: Environmental Performance
This volume addresses land conservation and consideration of natural resources. The chapter, goals, and policies pertaining to archaeological resources and human remains are as follows (City of Rancho Cucamonga 2021a):

Chapter 1: Resource Conservation
Goal RC-4 Cultural Resources. A community rich with historic and cultural resources.

Policy RC-4.1. Disturbance of Human Remains. In areas where there is a high chance that human remains may be present, the City will require proposed projects to conduct a survey to establish occurrence of human remains, and measures to prevent impacts to human remains if found.

Policy RC -4.2. Discovery of Human Remains. Require that any human remains discovered during implementation of public and private projects within the city be treated with respect and dignity and fully comply with the California Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act and other appropriate laws.

Policy RC-4.3. Protected Sites. Require sites with significant cultural resources to be protected.

TO: MR. KEVIN RICE
SUBJECT: DRAFT ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE WHITTRAM AVENUE WAREHOUSE PROJECT,

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

14933 7 JANUARY 2023
Volume 4: Implementation Strategy
This volume incudes a Work Plan to guide City staff, decision makers, developers, and the public with specific actions and steps required to achieve the goals set forth in the PlanRC. Within the Work Plan are the City’s standard conditions of approval that address environmental issues with development that were identified within the approved General Plan EIR. While the conditions may not apply in all instances, or to all projects, the intent of this standardized list is to provide a starting point for project evaluation by the City Staff, a nd is subject to revisions based on current industry standards (City of Rancho Cucamonga 2021b).

Standard Conditions of Approval
The standard conditions of approval as they pertain to cultural resources, specifically, archaeological and tribal cultural resources are as follows:

Cultural Resources

5.5-2: If human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100-foot buffer of the find) shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7050.5 and that code enforced for the duration of the project.

5.5-7: If cultural resources that are eligible for listing to the National Register of Historic Places, California Register of Historic Resources, or a local register are identified within or adjacent to the proposed development, the construction limits shall be clearly flagged to ensure impacts to eligible cultural resources are avoided or minimized to the extent feasible. Prior to implementing construction activities, a qualified archaeologist shall verify that the flagging clearly delineates the construction limits and eligible resources to be avoided. Since the location of some eligible cultural resources is confidential, these resources will be flagged as environmentally sensitive areas.

5.5-8: To determine the archaeological sensitivity for discretionary projects within the city, an archaeological resources assessment shall be performed under the supervision of an archaeologist that meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professionally Qualified Standards (PQS) in either prehistoric or historic archaeology. The assessments shall include a California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) records search and a search of the Sacred Lands File (SLF) maintained by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). The records searches shall determine if the proposed project has been previously surveyed for archaeological resources, identify and characterize the results of previous cultural resource surveys, and disclose any cultural resources that have been recorded and/or evaluated. A Phase I pedestrian survey shall be undertaken in areas that are undeveloped to locate any surface cultural materials.

• If potentially significant archaeological resources are identified through an archaeological resources assessment, and impacts to these resource cannot be avoided, a Phase II Testing and Evaluation investigation shall be performed by an archaeologist who meets the PQS prior to any construction-related ground disturbing activities to determine significance. If resources determined significant or unique through Phase II testing, and site avoidance is not possible, appropriate site-specific mitigation measures shall be established and undertaken. These might include a Phase III data recovery program that would be implemented by a qualified archaeologist and shall be performed in accordance with the Office of Historic

TO: MR. KEVIN RICE
SUBJECT: DRAFT ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE WHITTRAM AVENUE WAREHOUSE PROJECT,

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

14933 8 JANUARY 2023
Preservation’s Archaeological Resource Management Reports (ARMR): Recommended Contents and Format (1990) and Guidelines for Archaeological Research Designs (1991).

• If the archaeological assessment did not identify potentially significant archaeological resources within the proposed General Plan area but indicated the area to be highly sensitive for archaeological resources, a qualified archaeologist shall monitor all ground -disturbing construction and pre -construction activities in areas with previously undisturbed soil. The archaeologist shall inform all construction personnel prior to construction activities of the proper procedures in the event of an archaeological discovery. The training shall be held in conjunction with the project’s initial onsite safety meeting, and shall explain the importance and legal basis for the protection of significant archaeological resources. In the event that archaeological resources (artifacts or features) are exposed during ground -disturbing activities, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall be halted while the resources are evaluated for significance by an archaeologist who meets the PQS. If the discovery proves to be significant, it shall be curated with a recognized scientific or educational repository.

• If the archae ological assessment did not identify potentially significant archaeological resources, but indicates the area to be of medium sensitivity for archaeological resources, an archaeologist who meets the PQS shall be retained on an on -call basis. The archaeolog ist shall inform all construction personnel prior to construction activities about the proper procedures in the event of an archaeological discovery. The training shall be held in conjunction with the project’s initial on-site safety meeting, and shall exp lain the importance and legal basis for the protection of significant archaeological resources. In the event that archaeological resources (artifacts or features) are exposed during ground disturbing activities, construction activities in the immediate vic inity of the discovery shall be halted while the on -call archaeologist is contacted. If the discovery proves to be significant, it shall be curated with a recognized scientific or education repository.

Tribal Cultural Resources

5.18-1: Inadvertent Archeological Find. If during ground disturbance activities, cultural resources are discovered that were not assessed by the archaeological report(s) and/or environmental assessment conducted prior to project approval, the following procedures shall be followed. Cultural resources are defined as being multiple artifacts in close association with each other, but also include fewer artifacts if the area of the find is determined to be of significance due to its sacred or cultural importance as determined in c onsultation with the Native American Tribe(s).
• All ground disturbance activities within 100 feet of the discovered cultural resources shall be halted until a meeting is convened between the developer, the archaeologist, the tribal representative(s) and th e Planning Director to discuss the significance of the find. • At the meeting, the significance of the discoveries shall be discussed and after consultation with the tribal representative(s) and the archaeologist, a decision shall be made, with the concurre nce of the Planning Director, as to the appropriate mitigation (documentation, recovery, avoidance, etc.) for the cultural resources.

TO: MR. KEVIN RICE
SUBJECT: DRAFT ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE WHITTRAM AVENUE WAREHOUSE PROJECT,

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

14933 9 JANUARY 2023
• Grading or further ground disturbance shall not resume within the area of the discovery until an agreement has been reached by all parties as to the appropriate mitigation. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area and will be monitored by additional Tribal monitors if needed. • Treatment and avoidance of the newly discovered resources shall be consistent with the Cultural Resources Management Plan and Monitoring Agreements entered into with the appropriate tribes. This may include avoidance of the cultural resources through project design, in -place preservation of cultural resources located in native soils and/or re-burial on the Project property so they are not subject to further disturbance in perpetuity as identified in Non-Disclosure of Reburial Locations Condition. • If the find is determined to be significant and avoidance of the site has not been achieved, a Phase III data recovery plan shall be prepared by the project archaeologist, in consultation with the Tribe, and shall be submitted to the City for their review and approval prior to implementation of the said plan. • Pursuant to Calif. Pub. Res. Code § 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources and tribal cultural resources. If the landowner and the Tribe(s) cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for the archaeological or tribal cultural r esources, these issues will be presented to the Planning Director for decision. The City’s Planning Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological and tribal cultural resources, recommendations of the project archaeologist, and shall take into account the cultural and religious principles and practices of the Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the City Planning Director shall be appealable to the City Planning Commission and/or City Council.

5.18-2: Cultural Resources Disposition. In the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered during the course of grading (inadvertent discoveries), the following procedures shall be carried out for final disposition of the discoveries:
• One or more of the following treatments, in order of preference, shall be employed with the tribes. Evidence of such shall be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department:
o Preservation-In-Place of the cultural resources, if feasible. Preservation in place means avoiding the resources, leaving them in the place where they were found with no development affecting the integrity of the resources.
o Reburial of the resources on the Project property. The measures for reburial shall include, at least, the following: Measures and provisions to protect the future reburial area from any future impacts in perpetuity. Reburial shall not occur until all legally required cataloging and basic recording has been completed, with an exception that sacred items, burial goods, and Native American human remains are excluded. Any reburial process shall be culturally appropriate. Listing of contents and location of the reburial shall be i ncluded in the confidential Phase IV report. The Phase IV Report shall be filed with the City under a confidential cover and not subject to Public Records Request. o If preservation in place or reburial is not feasible then the resources shall be curated in a culturally appropriate manner at a San Bernardino County curation facility that meets State Resources

TO: MR. KEVIN RICE
SUBJECT: DRAFT ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE WHITTRAM AVENUE WAREHOUSE PROJECT,

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

14933 10 JANUARY 2023
Department Office of Historic Preservation Guidelines for the Curation of Archaeological Resources ensuring access and use pursuant to the Guidelines. The collection and associated records shall be transferred, including title, and are to be accompanied by payment of the fees by the Applicant necessary for permanent curation. Evidence of curation in the form of a letter from the curation facility stating that subject archaeological materials have been received and that all fees have been paid, shall be provided by the landowner to the City. There shall be no destructive or invasive testing on sacred items, burial goods, and Native American human remains, as defined by the cultural and religious practices of the Most Likely Descendant. Results concerning finds of any inadvertent discoveries shall be included in the Phase IV monitoring report.

5.18-3: Archaeologist Retained. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the project applicant shall retain a qualified Registered Professional Archaeologist (RPA), to monitor all ground disturbing activities in an effort to identify any unknown archaeological resources. The Registered Professional Archaeologi st and the Tribal monitor(s) shall manage and oversee monitoring for all initial ground disturbing activities and excavation of each portion of the project site including clearing, grubbing, tree removals, mass or rough grading, trenching, stockpiling of materials, rock crushing, structure demolition and etc. The Registered Professional Archaeologist and the Tribal monitor(s), shall independently have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect, or halt the ground disturbance activities to allow identification, evaluation, and potential recovery of cultural resources in coordination with any required special interest or tribal monitors. The developer/permit holder shall submit a fully executed copy of the contract to the Planning Department to ensure compl iance with this condition of approval. Upon verification, the Planning Department shall clear this condition. In addition, the Registered Professional Archaeologist, in consultation with the Consulting Tribe(s), the contractor, and the City, shall develop a Cultural Resources Management Plan (CRMP) in consultation pursuant to the definition in AB 52 to address the details, timing, and responsibility of all archaeological and cultural activities that will occur on the project site. A consulting tribe is defined as a tribe that initiated the AB 52 tribal consultation process for the Project, has not opted out of the AB 52 consultation process, and has completed AB 52 consultation with the City as provided for in Cal Pub Res Code Section 21080.3.2(b)(1) of AB52. Details in the Plan shall include:
• Project grading and development scheduling;

• The Project archaeologist and the Consulting Tribes(s) shall attend the pre -grading meeting with the City, the construction manager and any contractors, and will co nduct a mandatory Cultural Resources Worker Sensitivity Training to those in attendance. The Training will include a brief review of the cultural sensitivity of the Project and the surrounding area; what resources could potentially be identified during earthmoving activities; the requirements of the monitoring program; the protocols that apply in the event inadvertent discoveries of cultural resources are identified, including who to contact and appropriate avoidance measures until the find(s) can be proper ly evaluated; and any other appropriate protocols. All new construction personnel that will conduct earthwork or grading activities that begin work on the Project following the initial Training must take the Cultural Sensitivity Training prior to beginning work and the Project archaeologist and Consulting Tribe(s) shall make themselves available to provide the training on an as-needed basis;

TO: MR. KEVIN RICE
SUBJECT: DRAFT ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE WHITTRAM AVENUE WAREHOUSE PROJECT,

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

14933 11 JANUARY 2023
• The protocols and stipulations that the contractor, City, Consulting Tribe(s) and Project archaeologist will follow in the event of inadvertent cultural resources discoveries, including any newly discovered cultural resource deposits that shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation.

5.18-4: Native American Monitoring. Tribal monitor(s) shall be required on -site during all ground-disturbing activities, including grading, stockpiling of materials, engineered fill, rock crushing, etc. The land divider/permit holder shall retain a qualified tribal monitor(s) from the requesting Tribe. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall submit a copy of a signed contract between the Tribe and the land divider/permit holder for the monitoring of the project to the Planning Department and to the Engineering Department. The Tribal Monitor(s) shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt the ground-disturbance activities to allow recovery of cultural resources, in coordination with the Project Archaeologist.

5.18-5: Archeology Report - Phase III and IV. Prior to final inspection, the developer/permit holder shall prompt the Project Archeologist to submit two (2) copies of the Phase III Data Recovery report (if required for the Project) and the Phase IV Cultural Resources Monitoring Report that complies with the Community Development Department's requirements for such reports. The Phase IV report shall include evidence of the required cultural/historical sensitivity training for the construction staff held during the pre-grade meeting. The Planning Department shall review the reports to determine adequate mitigation compliance. Provided the reports are adequate, the Community Development Department shall clear this condition. Once the report(s) are determined to be adequate, two (2) copies shall be submitted to the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) at California State University, Fullerton and one (1) copy shall be submitted to the Consulting Tribe(s) Cultural Resources Department(s).

5.18-6: Human Remains. If human remains are encountered, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the San Bernardino County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to Public Resource Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the San Bernardino County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission shall be contacted within the period specified by law (24 hours). Subsequently, the Native American Heritage Commission shall identify the "most likely descendant." The most likely descendant shall then make recommendations and engage in consultation concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98.

5.18-7: Non-Disclosure of Reburial Locations. It is understood by all parties that unless otherwise required by law, the site of any reburial of Native American human remains or associated grave goods shall not be disclosed and shall not be governed by public disclosure requirements of the California Public Records Act. The Coroner, pursuant to the specific exemption set forth in California Government Code 6254 (r)., parties, and Lead Agencies, will be asked to withhold publi c disclosure information related to such reburial, pursuant to the specific exemption set forth in California Government Code 6254 (r).

TO: MR. KEVIN RICE
SUBJECT: DRAFT ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE WHITTRAM AVENUE WAREHOUSE PROJECT,

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

14933 12 JANUARY 2023
Background Research
SCCIC Records Search
On December 6, 2022, Dudek conducted a search of the CHRIS at the SCCIC located at the California State University, Fullerton. The search included any previously recorded cultural resources and investigations within a

0.5-mile radius of the proposed Projec t site. The CHRIS search also included a review of the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), the California Points of Historical Interest list, the California Historical Landmarks list, the Arc haeological Determinations of Eligibility list, and the California State Historic Resources Inventory list. Dudek reviewed the SCCIC records to determine whether the implementation of the proposed Project would have the potential to impact any known and un known cultural resources. The confidential records search results are provided in Confidential Appendix B.

Previously Conducted Cultural Resource Studies
Results of the cultural resources records search indicate that nineteen (19) cultural resource studies have been conducted within a 0.5-mile of the proposed Project site between 1985 and 2010; one of these studies (SB-06986), addresses less than 5 percent of the proposed Project site, and a second study ( SB-04141) is adjacent to the north of the proposed Project site. This suggests that the majority of the proposed Project site has not been subjected to any previous archaeological investigations , including archaeological survey, prior to development and/or ground disturbing activities. Table 1, below, summari zes all previous studies and is followed by a brief summary of the reports adjacent and intersecting the proposed Project site.

Table 1. Previous Technical Studies Within a 0.5-Mile of the Proposed Project Site SCCIC
Report
No.

Authors Year Title
Proximity
to
Proposed
Project
Site
SB-01501 Mason, Rodger D. 1985 Cultural Resource Survey Report for the Etiwanda Pipeline and Power Plant EIR Outside
SB-02286 Clevenger Joyce M. 1988
Cultural Resource Survey of the Etiwanda Pipeline
and Power Plant and Alternatives, San Bernardino
County, California
Outside
SB-03591 Own Shelley Marie 1995
Cultural Resource Record Search and
Management Plan for the San Sevaine
Redevelopment project area, San Bernardino
County, CA
Outside
SB-03592 McLean, Deborah
and Jani Monk 1997
Cultural Resource Assessment of the Kaiser West
End Project, City of Fontana, San Bernardino
County, CA
Outside
SB-04138 Tang, Bai 2002
Identification & Evaluation of Historic Properties
Fourth St Recycled Water Pipeline in and Near
Cities of Ontario & Rancho Cucamonga, San
Bernardino County, CA
Outside

TO: MR. KEVIN RICE
SUBJECT: DRAFT ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE WHITTRAM AVENUE WAREHOUSE PROJECT,

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

14933 13 JANUARY 2023
Table 1. Previous Technical Studies Within a 0.5-Mile of the Proposed Project Site SCCIC
Report
No.

Authors Year Title
Proximity
to
Proposed
Project
Site
SB-04140 Tang, Bai and
Miriam Dahdul 2002
Identification & Evaluation of Historic Properties:

Etiwanda Ave Extension Recycled Water Pipeline in
and Near the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San
Bernardino County CA
Outside
SB-04141 Dahdul, Miriam 2002
Identification & Evaluation of Historical Properties:

Whittram Ave Recycled Water Pipeline in and Near
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino,
CA
Adjacent
to the
north
SB-04668
Bonner, Wayne H.
and Chisteen
Taniguchi
2004
Records Search Results and Site Visit for Sprint
Telecommunications Facility Candidate
SB60XC844A (Reeves Trucking) 8615 pecan
Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino
County, California
Outside
SB-04691 Bonner, Wayne H. 2005
Cultural Resource Records Search and Site Visit
Results for Cingular Telecommunications Facility
Candidate ES-0012-02 (Fontana), 13560
Whittram Avenue, Fontana, San Bernardino
County, California
Outside
SB-04692 Bonner, Wayne H. 2006
Cultural Resource Records Search Results and
Site Visit for T-Mobile Telecommunications Facility
Candidate IE04921C (SCE M23-T4), 13100 Block
of Foothill Boulevard, Rancho Cucamonga, San
Bernardino County, California
Outside
SB-04873 Encarnacion,
Deirdre 2005
Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey
Report: San Bernardino Avenue Pipeline and Pump
Station In and Near the City of Fontana, San
Bernardino County, California.

Outside
SB-05425
Bai "Tom" Tang,
Thomas Melzer,
Laura H. Shaker,
Dierdre
Encarnacion, and
Michael Hogan
2006
Identification and Evaluation of Historic Properties:
1158 Zone Pipeline Project, City of Rancho
Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, CA
Outside
SB-05485 Schmidt, James J. 2007
DWO 4505-3127: Rancho Vista New AA Station
Project, Etiwanda Area, San Bernardino County,
California.

Outside
SB-05487 Encarnacion,
Deirdre 2007
Identification and Evaluation of Historic Properties:

Etiwanda 1270 Reservoir and Pipeline, City of
Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County,
California.

Outside

TO: MR. KEVIN RICE
SUBJECT: DRAFT ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE WHITTRAM AVENUE WAREHOUSE PROJECT,

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

14933 14 JANUARY 2023
Table 1. Previous Technical Studies Within a 0.5-Mile of the Proposed Project Site SCCIC
Report
No.

Authors Year Title
Proximity
to
Proposed
Project
Site
SB-05999
Tang, Bai “Tom”,
John J. Eddy, Harry
M. Quinn, Terri
Jacquemain,
Daniel Ballester,
and Laura Hensley
Shaker
2008
Identification and Evaluation of Historic Properties:

Northeast Recycled Water Expansion Projects in
and near the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and
Fontana, San Bernardino County, California.

Outside
SB-06000
Tang, Bai “Tom”,
John J. Eddy, Harry
M. Quinn, Terri
Jacquemain,
Daniel Ballester,
and Laura Hensley
Shaker
2008
Extended Phase I Historical/Archaeological
Resources Study: Northeast Recycled Water
Expansion Projects in and near the Cities of
Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana, San Bernardino
County, California.

Outside
SB-06986 Glover, Amy and
Sherri Gust 2010
Phase I Resources Assessment Report for the
Falcon Ridge Substation Project in the Cities of
Fontana and Rialto, San Bernardino County,
California.

Intersects
SB-07084 Tang, Bai “Tom” 2010
Preliminary Historical/Archaeological Resources
Study, San Bernardino Line Positive Train Control
Project, Southern California Regional Rail
Authority, Counties of Los Angeles, and San
Bernardino.

Outside
SB-07569 McDougall, Dennis
P. and Jill A. Onken 2003
Inland Feeder Pipeline Project: Final Synthetic
Report of Archaeological Findings, San Bernardino
County, California.

Outside

Report SB-04141
Identification & Evaluation of Historical Properties: Whittram Ave Recycled Water Pipeline in and Near the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino, CA, 21PP (Dahdul 2002) documents the results of an archaeological investigation consisting of an archival record search, literature review, Native American consultation, and pedestrian survey in support of a proposed recycled water pipeline. The linear study area is immediately adjacent to the north of the proposed Project. The study was conducted in conformance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), to provide the Inland Empire Utilities Agency with the necessary information and analysis to determine whether the proposed undertaking would have any effects on historic properties. No previously recorded cultural resources or known properties were identified adjacent to the current proposed Project site as a result of the investigation. Dahdul (2002) concluded that no further cultural resources investigations were recommended unless project plans undergo changes and provided the following recommen dations for the inadvertent discoveries of cultural materials during construction activities: all work in the area is to be stopped or diverted until a qualified archaeologist can evaluate and determine significance.

TO: MR. KEVIN RICE
SUBJECT: DRAFT ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE WHITTRAM AVENUE WAREHOUSE PROJECT,

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

14933 15 JANUARY 2023
Report SB -06986
Phase I Resources Assessment Report for the Falcon Ridge Substation Project in the Cities of Fontana and Rialto, San Bernardino County, California (Glover and Gust 2010) documents the results Phase I cultural resources assessment consisting of an archival record search, literature review, Native American consultation, and pedestrian survey. The linear study area intersects the proposed Project site along the west boundary. The study was conducted in conformance with CEQA, to determine the potential effects of the proposed Falcon Ridge substation Project in the Cities of Rialto and Fontana in San Bernardino County, California on archaeological and historical resources.

The study was requested by Southern California Edison. No previously recorded cultural resources were identified within the current proposed Project site as a result of the investigation. Glover and Gust (2010) concluded that no portion of the proposed work will impact known significant archaeological or histo ric resources and provided the following recommendations for the inadvertent discovery of cultural resources: halt of work in the vicinity of the find with a minimum 50-foot radius, until the discovery can be evaluated by a qualified archaeologist.

Previously Recorded Cultural Resources
The SCCIC records indicate that two (2) cultural resources have been previously recorded within 0.5 -mile of the proposed Project site; neither resource are located within or are adjacent to the proposed Project site. The identified resources historic built environment resources, both located over 0.3 miles from the proposed Project site; of these resources, one resource (P -36-004131) was demolished in the 1990s . No historic -period or prehistoric archaeological resources were identified within the proposed Project site. A summary of the two (2) cultural resources identified within the proposed Project’s records search area are provided below followed by summaries of each resource.

Table 2. Previously Recorded Cultural Resources Within a 0.5-Mile Radius of the Proposed Project Site
Designation Description Recording Events NRHP/CRHR
Status
Approximate
Proximity to
Proposed
Project Site
P-36-004131;
CA-SBR-4131H
Historic Built Environment:

Kaiser Steel; World War II
steel manufacturing plant;
demolished in 1990s.
1975 (Hansberger,
Dennis);
1980 (Teal, G);
1997 (McLean,
Deborah);
2008 (Ballester,
Colton);
2010 (Victoria
Harvey, Lindsay
Andrews, Southern
California Edison)
7: Not Evaluated for
NRHP or CRHR Outside

TO: MR. KEVIN RICE
SUBJECT: DRAFT ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE WHITTRAM AVENUE WAREHOUSE PROJECT,

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

14933 16 JANUARY 2023
Table 2. Previously Recorded Cultural Resources Within a 0.5-Mile Radius of the Proposed Project Site
Designation Description Recording Events NRHP/CRHR
Status
Approximate
Proximity to
Proposed
Project Site
P-36-006847
Historic Built Environment:
segment of Old Kite
Route/Atchison, Topeka,
and Santa Fe Railway
1990 (Romani,
Gwen);
1990 (G. Romani et
al);
1995 (F. Smith,
Myra);
1997 (B. Tang);
1998 (M. Horne et
al);
2000 (M. Robinson);
2008 (C. Harper);
2010 (C. Tibbett);
2010 (E. Potter);
2014 (M. DeCarlo &
D. Mengers);
2016
6Z: Found ineligible
for NR, CR or local
designation
through survey
evaluation
Outside

P-36-004131 /CA-SBR -4131H
P-36-004131; CA-SBR-4131H is a historic built environment resource. The resource is documented as the Kaiser Steel Mill and consisted of several World War II era buildings within an approximately 4 -acre area at an elevation of 1120 feet above mean sea level (amsl). The resource as mapped in SCCIC reco rds, is located east of the proposed Project site. In 1975, the resource was designated as a California Point of Historical Interest, though not recognized as a State Registered Historical Landmark. The site was originally formally recorded in 1980 by G. Teal; however, information provided within this initial record is limited to location, period of significance and mention of the resource as Point of Historical Interest. Subsequent documentation of the resource occu rred in 1997 by LSA Associates, Inc. during a survey in support of a cultural resources assessment. The 1997 documentation includes records for all buildings and/or structures associated with the steel mill. The record for the resource was updated in 2008 by Daniel Ballester, who noted that the resource was demolished in the 1990s to make way for the California Speedway and the resource no longer exists. A review of the record indicates that the resource was not evaluated for NRHP or CRHR eligibility prior to demolition.

P-36-006847
P-36-006847 is a historic built environment resource located approximately 1,600 feet (490 meters) west of the proposed Project area. P -36-006847 is documented as segments of the old Kite Route/Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe Railway. The site was originally formally recorded in 1990 by Romani, VanderVeen, Kenny, and Texier who described the site as containing two sets of parallel standing stepped concrete bridge walls, old railroad grade, large cut-off anchor bars (in the concrete form), railroad ties, remnants of volcanic railroad ballast, and whiteware ceramic fragments. However, the segment of P-36-006847 closest to the proposed Project site was first formally recorded in 2016 by ICF who recorded this segment as being used for loading and unloading or storage . Some

TO: MR. KEVIN RICE
SUBJECT: DRAFT ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE WHITTRAM AVENUE WAREHOUSE PROJECT,

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

14933 17 JANUARY 2023
portions of the site have maintained their integrity and are listed on the NRHP; however, the segment of the railroad closest to the present proposed Project site, is not recommended as eligible for the NRHP or CRHR.

Review of Historical Topographical Maps and Aerial Photographs Dudek consulted historical topographic maps and aerial photographs through the Nationwide Environmental Title Research, LLC (NETR) to better understand any natural or human-made changes to the proposed Project site and surrounding properties over time.

Historical Topographic Maps
Topographic maps depict elevation of the study area as well as the areas surrounding it and illustrate the location of roads and some buildings. Although topographic maps are not comprehensive, they are another tool in determining whether a study area has been disturbed and at times to what approximate depth. A review of available topographic maps was conducted and includes the following years: 1897, 1900, 1903, 1906, 1908, 1911, 1912, 1917, 1927, 1929, 2932, 1939, 1947, 1955, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1965, 1969, 1973, 1975, 1982, 2012, 2015, and 2018 (NETR 2022a). Table 3 summarizes the results of the historical topographic map review of the proposed Project site and surrounding properties for all available years.

Table 3. Review of Historical Topographic Maps
Year Description
1897
The proposed Project site is shown to be undeveloped.

An unnamed narrow wash mapped as extending roughly northeast to southwest/south, is depicted near the western boundary.
1900 - 1947 No significant changes to the proposed Project site 1955
The proposed Project site is depicted as an orchard and containing three structures within the northern half portion; it is unclear which specific parcels these structures are within.

An unnamed east to west road trending road (present-day Whittram Avenue), is depicted along the northern boundary.

There are transmission lines trending north to south along the western boundary.

The Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad, running east to west, is depicted just south of the proposed Project site.
1961 - 1965 No significant changes to the proposed Project site. 1969
The proposed Project site is no longer depicted as an orchard.

The unnamed road immediately north of the proposed Project site is now identified as Whittram Avenue.

The wash observed in 1897 is now an intermittent waterway identified as “East Etiwanda Creek”.
1973 This topographical map is a copy of the 1965 map.
1975 This topographical map is a copy of the 1969 map.
1982 No significant changes to the proposed Project site 2012 No structures are depicted within the proposed Project site and the power transmission line to the west of the proposed Project site is no longer depicted.

TO: MR. KEVIN RICE
SUBJECT: DRAFT ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE WHITTRAM AVENUE WAREHOUSE PROJECT,

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

14933 18 JANUARY 2023
Table 3. Review of Historical Topographic Maps
Year Description
2015 - 2018 No significant changes to the proposed Project site While topographic maps are informative, they do not illustrate the minute changes that can occur to a landscape overtime and at times, are inconsistent with what is depicted year to year. Most often, structures depicted in topographical maps are limited to those with community or social significance (e.g. Firehouses or Hospitals), including additions or changes to roads and/or waterways. Nonetheless, the information gathered contributes to the understanding of the chronological development of a study area.

Historical Aerial Photographs
A review of historical aerial photographs from the following years was conducted as part of the archival research effort and includes the following years: 1938, 1948, 1959, 1966, 1985, 1994, 2002, 2005, 2009, 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016, 2018, and 2020 (NETR 2022b). Through careful comparative review of historical aerials, changes to the landscape of a study area may be revealed. Disturbance to the study area is specifically important as it helps determine if soils within the study area are capable o f sustaining intact archaeological deposits. Additionally, historical aerials have the potential to reveal whether a study area was subjected to alluvial deposits by way of flooding, debris flows or mudslides, as well as placement of artificial or foreign fill soils that may have buried intact archaeological deposits. Table 4 summarizes the results of the aerial photograph review for all available years that include the proposed Project site and surrounding properties.

Table 4. Historical Aerial Photograph Review
Year Description
1938
The proposed Project site is shown as orchards with a wash (present-day East Etiwanda Creek) running north to south to the west and overlapping the proposed Project site.

The Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad is shown traveling east to west, just south of the proposed Project site.

A line of trees runs along the northern boundary.
1948
An east to west road (present-day Whittram Avenue), is depicted along the northern boundary, just north of the tree line noted previously.

The orchard trees appear to have been removed; the land appears to be plowed.

The wash has narrowed, though it is unclear whether there is water flowing.

Two structures are visible within the proposed Project site: one near the northwest corner and a second structure in the northeast corner.
1959
The proposed Project site appears to be back in use as agricultural land.

At least four (4) structures are visible in the northeast corner of the proposed Project site with a few trees. In addition, there are two (2) structures visible in the northwest corner.

The area surrounding the Proposed project site appears to be more developed. 1966 The proposed Project site appears to still be in agricultural use.

TO: MR. KEVIN RICE
SUBJECT: DRAFT ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE WHITTRAM AVENUE WAREHOUSE PROJECT,

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

14933 19 JANUARY 2023
Table 4. Historical Aerial Photograph Review
Year Description
Trees that lined the northern boundary of the proposed Project site along Whittram Avenue have been removed.

There is an addition of one building is depicted in the northeastern corner of the proposed Project site.

Due to the quality of the aerial photograph, it is difficult to discern the number of structures in the northwest corner of the proposed Project site to determine if there are any changes. 1985
The proposed Project site appears to no longer be in agricultural use; the southern half is open fields.

Structures are still visible in the northern half portion of the proposed Project site.

Outside and immediately east of the proposed Project site a large development is shown. 1994
The northwest corner of the proposed Project site has been cleared and appears to be a parking lot, though trees are still visible.

The northeast corner of the proposed Project site has three structures that are surrounded by large trees and all is enclosed within a fenced area.
2002 A series of dirt paths/trails are shown traversing the proposed Project site in various directions, primarily within the undeveloped and vacant portions of the proposed Project site. 2005 Overall, the images captured in this aerial are generally consistent with present-day site conditions.
2009-2012 No significant changes to the proposed Project site. 2014 Vegetation along East Etiwanda Creek to the west and slightly overlapping the proposed Project site, appears to have increased in density.
2020 The overall proposed Project site appears to have an increase in low lying vegetation.

Geotechnical Report Review
The geotechnical report, Geotechnical Engineering Investigation – Proposed Industrial Warehouse Development 12987 to 13045 Whittram Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, California (NorCal Engineering 2021), was prepared for Patriot Partners in November 2021 to determine the subsurface geological conditions of the proposed Project site.

The report details the results of eleven (11) trenching explorations (T-1 through T-11). All eleven (11) subsurface investigations were placed at accessible locations throughout the proposed Project site , as depicted in Image 1, below.

TO: MR. KEVIN RICE
SUBJECT: DRAFT ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE WHITTRAM AVENUE WAREHOUSE PROJECT,

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

14933 20 JANUARY 2023

Subsurface trenching explorations extended to a maximum depth ranging from 5 to 18.5 feet below ground surface (bgs) using a backhoe, and were completed on November 6, 2021. According to the geotechnical report, the soils encountered include: 1) Fill Soils: characterized as brown, fine to medium grained, silty sand with occasional gravel and rootlets encountered across the proposed Project site with one location, T-10, consisting of excessive amounts of asphaltic and brick debris, cobbles, boulders, and large concrete debris with the possible limits of the deep fill is marked up in Image 1; 2) Natural or Native Soils: characterized as natural undisturbed soil that is brown, fine to medium grained silty sand with occasional gravel that was identified underlying fill soils to maximum dept hs explored. Table 5, below, summarizes the results of the 11 subsurface exploratory trenches within the proposed Project site.

Image 1. Boring Location Map (NorCal Engineering 2022, Figure 1.)

TO: MR. KEVIN RICE
SUBJECT: DRAFT ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE WHITTRAM AVENUE WAREHOUSE PROJECT,

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

14933 21 JANUARY 2023
Table 5. Summary of Subsurface Boring Results – NorCal Engineering 2022 Boring Fill Natural/Native Soils
T-1 0 to 1 feet bgs 1 to 5 feet bgs
T-2 0 to 1 feet bgs 1 to 10 feet bgs
T-3 0 to 1 feet bgs 1 to 18.5 feet bgs
T-4 0 to 1 feet bgs 1 to 10 feet bgs
T-5 0 to 1 feet bgs 1 to 10 feet bgs
T-6 0 to 3 feet bgs 3 to 10 feet bgs
T-7 0 to 1.5 feet bgs 1.5 to 10 feet bgs
T-8 0 to 3 feet bgs 3 to 10 feet bgs
T-9 0 to 2 feet bgs 2 to 10 feet bgs
T-10 0 to 6 feet bgs 6 to 10 feet bgs
T-11 0 to 3 feet bgs 3 to 10 feet bgs
Note: The transition from one soil type to another at each trenching location is approximate. 1938 Kirkman-Harriman Historical Map Review
Dudek cultural resources specialists reviewed sources commonly identified though Tribal consultation, notably the 1938 Kirkman-Harriman Historical Map (Image 2). Based on this map, the proposed Project site overlaps a west– east-trending “Old S. Bernardino Road”; nearly 2 miles south of the northeast-southwest-trending “Old Salt Road”; over 6 miles northwest of Jurupa Hills; and 3.5 miles northeast of a Mission Road. The confluence of Lytle Creek Wash and Cajon Wash is mapped 9.5 miles to the northeast and the Santa Ana River is over 10 miles to the south.

The nearest mapped Native American village is more than 4 miles northwest of the proposed Project site and is labeled on the map as “Cuca mogna,” situated just northwest of the confluence of the Santa Fe Trail and Old Stage Road in an area labeled as “New Mexico”.

It should be noted that this map is highly generalized due to scale and age and may be somewhat inaccurate with regards to distance and location of mapped features. Additionally, this map was prepa red based on review of historic documents and notes more than 100 years following secularization of the missions (in 1833). Although the map contains no specific primary references, it matches with the details documented by the Portolá expedition (circa 1769–1770). The map is a valuable representation of post-colonization mission history; however, it is limited to a specific period of Native American history and substantiation of the specific location and uses of the represented individual features should be verified by archaeological records and/or other primary documentation.

No archaeological evidence of the nearest village on the 1938 Kirkman-Harriman map was provided in the SCCIC records or as the result of a review of other archaeological information for the proposed Project site. This suggests that the village is either likely no nearer than a 0.5 -mile from the proposed Project site or if existent within the records search radius, subsurface deposits associated with the village have not yet been discovered.

TO: MR. KEVIN RICE
SUBJECT: DRAFT ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE WHITTRAM AVENUE WAREHOUSE PROJECT,

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

14933 22 JANUARY 2023

Field Survey
Methods
Dudek Archaeologists, Linda Kry, BA, RA and Brenda Rogers, BA, conducted an intensive -level archaeological pedestrian survey of the proposed Project site on December 7, 2022 and January 6, 2023 . The survey s were conducted employing parallel transects, spaced no greater than 10 meters apart (approximately 32 feet), where feasible and safe to do so. In areas within a developed setting and with limited exposed sediment, a compressive archaeological survey was not c onducted. Instead, a mixed approach (opportunistic survey) and reconnaissance survey (visual inspection) were utilized, selectively examining areas of exposed ground surfaces, which was limited to landscaped areas.

Image 22: 1938 Kirkman-Harriman Historical Map (Proposed Project Site Symbolized in Green)

TO: MR. KEVIN RICE
SUBJECT: DRAFT ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE WHITTRAM AVENUE WAREHOUSE PROJECT,

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

14933 23 JANUARY 2023
The survey of proposed Project site included all five (5) parcels. The ground surface was inspected for prehistoric artifacts (e.g., flaked stone tools, tool -making debris, groundstone tools, ceramics, fire -affected rock), soil discoloration that might indicate the presence of a cultural midden , soil depressions, features indicative of structures and/or buildings (e.g., standing exterior walls, post holes, foundations), and historical artifacts (e.g., metal, glass, ceramics, building materials). Ground disturbances such as rodent burrows, cut ba nks, landscaped areas, base of bushes, and drainages, were also visually inspected for exposed subsurface materials. All field notes, photographs, and records related to the current study are on file at Dudek’s Pasadena, California office. All field practices met the Secretary of Interior’s standards and guidelines for a cultural resources inventory.

Results
Ground surface visibility within the proposed Project site was variable and as such, in areas of dense ground coverage, surface scrapes were occasionally implemented, when necessary, to enhance detection of archaeological materials that may have been obscured on the surface. Survey results for the five (5) parcels that make up the proposed Project site are discussed individually below. Note: the geotechn ical study revealed that the proposed Project site is predominately covered in fill soils although the origin of the soils was not mentioned. As such, any exposed soils observed during the survey were likely fill soils and not a good representation of the native soils present prior to development/ground disturbing activities.

APN 022-916-204
This parcel accounts for approximately 20 percent of the overall proposed Project site and is located at the southwest corner. The parcel is an open and undeveloped field with the north to south running East Etiwanda Creek, which borders the parcel to the west and partially overlaps. Disturbances observed within the parcel include evidence of tilling, a concentration of sand, rock, cobbles and boulders deposited along the southern extent of the East Etiwanda Creek, and modern refuse and structural debris observed eroding from the banks of the creek and scattered across the parcel. Vegetation on site within the parcel is sparse to moderately dense along the creek.

Given the current parcel conditions, ground surface visibility was variable and ranged from non-existent to fair (0 to 30 precent) in areas where the ground surface was obscured by refuse/debris and vegetation, and excellent (100 percent) for the remainder of the parcel, which accounted for approximately 80 percent of the parcel.

APN 022-916-205
This parcel accounts for approximately 60 percent of the overall proposed Project site and is primarily an open undeveloped field; however, at the northeast corner of t he parcel is an existing single-story residential structure and associated improvements, which accounts for approximately 20 percent of the parcel. Disturbances observed include a scatter and piles of modern refuse widely distributed across the site, including tires, structural debris, and consumables. Other disturbances observed include evidence of tilling and vehicular tracks that bisect the site north to south, originating from the entrance. A north -facing slope associated with the Atchison Topeka and Sa nta Fe Railroad is present immediately south of the proposed Project site. Vegetation on site within undeveloped portions of the parcel is moderately dense. Given the current parcel conditions, ground surface visibility was variable and ranged from non -existent to fair (0 to 30 precent) in areas where the ground surface was obscured by existing structures, refuse/debris, gravel/road base, and vegetation, and good to excellent (90 to 100 percent) for the remainder of the parcel, which accounted for approximately 50 percent of the parcel.

TO: MR. KEVIN RICE
SUBJECT: DRAFT ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE WHITTRAM AVENUE WAREHOUSE PROJECT,

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

14933 24 JANUARY 2023
APN 022 -916-211
This parcel accounts for approximately 10 percent of the overall proposed Project site and is located at the northwest corner, immediately east of APN 022-916-213. The parcel is within a developed setting and used as a paved/gravel covered lot for the parking/storage of vehicles. Disturbances observed include scatters of modern refuse, a pile of asphalt, shopping carts, and structural debris. Given the current parcel conditions, ground surface visibility was va riable and ranged from non -existent (0 percent) where the ground surface was obscured the previously noted disturbances and poor (less than 20 percent) where pockets of exposed ground soils were present, which accounted for less than 10 percent of the parcel.

APN 022 -916-212
This parcel accounts for approximately 5 percent of the overall proposed Project site and is located at the northwest corner, immediately west of APN 022-916-211. The parcel is within a developed setting and consists of existing residential structure and associated improvements, which accounts for approximately 10 percent of the parcel. The single-story residential structure has a landscaped front yard with vegetati on coverage and tree, and extensive pavement running along the east side of the structure and over the entire south area of the parcel, accounting for approximately 80 percent of the parcel. Disturbances observed include scatters of modern refuse. Given the current parcel conditions, ground surface visibility was variable and ranged from non-existent (0 percent) where the ground surface was obscured by the existing structure and pavement and fair (less than 25 percent) where pockets of exposed ground soils were present within the landscape areas, which accounted for approximately 10 percent of the parcel.

APN 022 -916-213
This parcel accounts for approximately 5 percent of the overall proposed Project site and is located at the northwest corner. The parcel is within a developed setting and used as a paved/gravel covered lot for the parking/storage of vehicles. Disturbances observed include scatters of modern refuse, a pile of asphalt, shopping carts, and structural debris. Given the current parcel conditions, ground surface visibility was variable and ranged from non-existent (0 percent) where the ground surface was obscured the previously noted disturbances and poor (less than 20 percent) where pockets of exposed ground soils were present, which accounted for less than 10 percent of the parcel.

As previously mentioned in Geotechnical Report Review section, subsurface exploratory investigations identified fill soils at depths from surface to between 1 and 6 feet bgs, depending on the location investigated, at all trenching locations within the proposed Project site . The presence of the fill soil is an indication that any potential cultural material from surface to between 1 and 6 feet bgs, has been previously displaced from the primary depositional location, buried, or destroyed. Additionally, the presence of fill soils demonstrates that the native soils upon and within which cultural deposits would exist in context was not observed during the survey. No cultural materials were observed within any of the five (5) parcels; however, due to the presence of fill soils, observation of intact native soils was not possible.

TO: MR. KEVIN RICE
SUBJECT: DRAFT ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE WHITTRAM AVENUE WAREHOUSE PROJECT,

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

14933 25 JANUARY 2023
Sensitivity Analysis
Archaeological Sensitivity
A search of the CHRIS database for the proposed Project site and 0.5-mile records search area did not identify any previously recorded historic-period or prehistoric archeological resources within the proposed Project site. Although nineteen (19) studies were identified within 0.5-mile of the proposed Project site, of which, one is adjacent and one intersects the proposed Project site and addresses less than 5 percent of the proposed Project site. This suggests that the majority of the proposed Project site has not been subjected to any archaeological investigations, including pedestrian survey, prior to development and/or ground disturbing activities. Therefore, no cultural resources were identified as a result of the previo us investigations. A review of available historical topographic maps and aerial photographs revealed that the proposed Project site was undeveloped as early as 1897 with a wash to the west.

By 1938, the proposed Project site is shown to be in use as an orchard within structures and the Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad is depicted to the south of the proposed Project site . In 1948, a road along the northern boundary proposed Project site is shown, consistent with route and location of present-day Whittram Avenue and orchard trees are removed and the ground plowed. The proposed Project site is used for agricultural purposes up until 1985 with intermittent clearing of the land throughout the remain der of the twentieth century. By 2005, the proposed Project site is shown to be consistent with present-day site conditions.

A review of a geotechnical report prepared for the proposed Project site determined that fills soils were identified from surface to between 1 and 6 feet bgs within all subsurface exploratory trenching locations. According to the geotechnical report, site preparation activities, including removal of all vegetation and/or demolition debris, disturbed and/or fill soils, scarification of the exposed native soils to a depth of 12 inches, and utility connection work suggests that the minimum depth of ground disturbance is 1 feet bgs across the proposed Project site with an assumed maximum depth of no greater than 7 feet bgs.

CEQA requires a lead agency to determine whether a project may have a significant effect on cultural resources.

This investigation was conducted in compliance with CEQA and in accordance with the City of Cucamonga’s standard conditions of approval, specifically, 5.5-8 for a Phase I archaeological inventory. In summary, no cultural resources were identified within the proposed Project as a result of the CHRIS records search, archival research, and intensive-level pedestrian survey; however, due to the presence of fill soi ls, observation of intact native soils was not possible. In consideration of all these factors, the potential to encounter intact cultural deposits containing archaeological resources within soils from the current grade and between 1 and 6 feet bgs is unlikely. However, the potential for intact cultural deposits to exist within native soils (below between 1 and 6 feet bgs) to the depths of proposed ground disturbance is unknown. Given that East Etiwanda Creek historically was in close proximity to and overlapping to the proposed Project site, there is a potential for the proposed Project site to be buried in alluvial and flood deposits. In the event that unanticipated archaeological resources are encountered during Project implementation, impacts to these re sources would be significant. As such, the following management recommendations are provided to ensure that impacts to unanticipated archaeological resources and human remains would be less than significant.

TO: MR. KEVIN RICE
SUBJECT: DRAFT ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE WHITTRAM AVENUE WAREHOUSE PROJECT,

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

14933 26 JANUARY 2023
Management Recommendations
Based on the above findings, adherence to state regulations, including the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s standard conditions of approval for archaeological and tribal cultural resources, will ensure proper treatment of any inadvertent finds of unknown cultural resources and/or human remains that may be encountered as a result of proposed Project ground disturbance activities. To ensure consistency of the training with the City’s standard conditions of approval 5.18 -3, a copy of the developed Cultural Resources Management Plan (CRMP) should be kept on the Project site throughout the duration of all construction tasks.

Should you have any questions relating to this report and its findings, please do not hesitate to contact Linda Kry at [email protected] or Heather McDaniel McDevitt at [email protected].

Sincerely,
____________________________________ ____________________________________ Linda Kry, B.A., RA Heather McDaniel McDevitt, M.A., RPA Archaeologist Archaeologist
Att: Appendix A: Figures
Appendix B. (Confidential) SCCIC Records Search Information

cc: Sean Kilkenny, Patrick Cruz, Dudek

TO: MR. KEVIN RICE
SUBJECT: DRAFT ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE WHITTRAM AVENUE WAREHOUSE PROJECT,

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

14933 27 JANUARY 2023
References
California Geological Survey. 2002. California Department of Conservation California Geomorphic Provinces.

Accessed December 2022.
https://www.coastal.ca.gov/coastalvoices/resources/California_Geomorphic_Provinces.pdf City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2021a. PlanRC 2040 – City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update, Volume 3 – Environmental Performance, Chapter 1: Resource Conservation. https://www.cityofrc.us/sites/default/files/2022-01/PlanRC_Volume%203_Final_pages.pdf. Accessed December 2022.

City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2021b. PlanRC 2040 – City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update, Volume 3 – Implementation Strategy, Standard Conditions of Approval. https://www.cityofrc.us/sites/default/files/2022-01/PlanRC_Volume%204_Final_pages.pdf. Accessed December 2022.

Dahdul, Miriam. 2002. Identification & Evaluation of Historical Properties: Whittram Ave Recycled Water Pipeline in and Near the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino, CA. On File at CHRIS South Central Coast Information Center located at California State University, Fullerton.

Glover, Amy and Sherri Gust. 2010. Phase I Resources Assessment Report for the Falcon Ridge Substation Project in the Cities of Fontana and Rialto, San Bernardino County, California. On File at CHRIS South Central Coast Information Center located at California State University, Fullerton.

Google. 2022. Google Earth; desktop application; centered on the project sites. Accessed January 2023. https://www.google.com/earth/.

NETR. 2022a. Topographic maps of Project Site, dating from 18 97 - 2018. Accessed January 2023. https://www.historicaerials.com/viewer.

NETR. 2022b. Historical Aerial Photogra phs of Project Site, dating from 19 38 - 2018. Accessed January 2023. https://www.historicaerials.com/viewer.

NorCal Engineering. 2021. Geotechnical Engineering Investigation - Proposed Industrial Warehouse Development 12987 to 13045 Whittram Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, California.

OHP (Office of Historic Preservation). 1995. Instructions for Recording Historical Resources. Available online October 2021. Website: http://ohp.parks.ca.gov/?page_id=1069.

P-36-004131/ CA-SBR-4131H. 2010. Department of Parks and Recreation Archaeological Site Record. On File at CHRIS South Central Coast Information Center located at California State University, Fullerton.

P-36-006847. 2016. Department of Parks and Recreation Archaeological Site Record. On File at CHRIS South Central Coast Information Center located at California State University, Fullerton.

TO: MR. KEVIN RICE
SUBJECT: DRAFT ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE WHITTRAM AVENUE WAREHOUSE PROJECT,

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

14933 28 JANUARY 2023
USDA (United States Department of Agriculture). 2022a. Web Soil Survey. ttps://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/ App/HomePage.htm. Accessed December 2022.

USDA. 2022b. https://soilseries.sc.egov.usda.gov/OSD_Docs/T/TUJUNGA.html. Accessed December 2022.

USGS (United States Geological Society). 2022. Mineral Resources Online Spatial Data. Interactive maps and downloadable data for regional and global analysis. Accessed December 2022. https://mrdata.usgs.gov/

Appendix A
Figures

Appendix B (Confidential)
SCCIC Records Search Results

Attachment D
Noise and Vibration Analysis Report

MEMORANDUM
To: Kevin Rice (Patriot Development Partners)
From: Ashley Vu (Dudek); Mike Greene, INCE Bd. Cert. (Dudek) Subject: 13045 Whittram Avenue Warehouse Project Noise and Vibration Technical Memorandum Date: December 16, 2022
cc: Patrick Cruz (Dudek)
Attachments: A – Field Noise Measurement Data
B – Construction Noise Modeling Input/Output Files
C – HVAC Noise Modeling Contours

Dudek is pleased to present Patriot Development Partners with the following noise and vibration analysis for the proposed 13045 Whittram Avenue Warehouse Project (Project) located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (City). The Project site would be located on the south side of Whittram Avenue, situated southeast of the Whittram Avenue and Etiwanda intersection (Figure 1).

This memorandum estimates and assesses noise and vibration levels from construction and operation of the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines and City of Rancho Cucamonga standards.

The contents and organization of this memorandum are as follows: Project Description, Environmental Setting, Regulatory Setting, Noise & Vibration Impact Analyses, Conclusions, and References Cited. 1 Project Description
The Project involves the construction and operation of one warehouse/distribution building totaling 86,194 square feet on 4.1 acres of a 5.2- acre property located south of Whittram Avenue between Etiwanda Avenue and Hickory Avenue at 13045 Whittram Avenue (see Figure 1, Project Location, and Figure 2, Site Plan).

The majority of the Project site is undeveloped, although two single-family residences are located on the northwest and northeast corners of the Project site. A stormwater drainage facility is located along the western boundary of the site. The Project site has a General Plan Land Use Designation of Neo-Industrial Employment District and a zoning district of Neo-Industrial (NI). The Project site is located in a primarily industrial area, surrounded by industrial uses and nonconforming uses such as single-family residential uses and truck storage uses.

While the Project site is located on a 5.2-acre property, the Project would only be developed on a 4.1-acre Project site. The remainder of the property, where the existing drainage is located, would be left undisturbed.

MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: WHITTRAM NOISE AND VIBRATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

14933 2 DECEMBER 2022
2 Environmental Setting

2.1 Noise and Vibration Characteristics

2.1.1 Noise
Sound may be described in terms of level or amplitude (quantified as decibels [dB]), frequency or pitch (described as hertz (Hz) or cycles per second), and duration (measured in seconds or minutes). Because the human ear is not equally sensitive to sound at all frequencies, a special frequency-dependent rating scale is used to relate noise to human sensitivity. The A-weighted decibel scale (dBA) performs this compensation by discounting sound at very low frequencies and very high frequencies in a manner approximating the sensitivity of the human ear , which works best in the audible spect rum usually associated with human speech . Several descriptors of noise have been established to help predict average community reactions to the adverse effects of environmental noise, including traffic-generated noise, on a community. These descriptors include the energy-equivalent noise level over a given period (L eq), the statistical sound level (L n), the day –night average noise level (L dn), and the community noise equivalent level (CNEL). Each of these descriptors uses units of dBA. Table 1 provides examples of A-weighted noise levels from common sounds. In general, human sound perception is such that a change in sound level of 3 dB is barely noticeable; a change of 5 dB is clearly noticeable; and a change of 10 dB is perceived as doubling or halving of the sound level.

Table 1. Typical Sound Levels in the Environment and Industry Common Outdoor Activities
Noise Level
(dBA) Common Indoor Activities
— 110 Rock band
Jet flyover at 300 meters (1,000 feet) 100 —
Gas lawn mower at 1 meter (3 feet) 90 —
Diesel truck at 15 meters (50 feet), at 80 kph
(50 mph)
80 Food blender at 1 meter (3 feet)
Garbage disposal at 1 meter (3 feet)
Noisy urban area, daytime
gas lawn mower at 30 meters (100 feet)
70 Vacuum cleaner at 3 meters (10 feet)
Commercial area
Heavy traffic at 90 meters (300 feet)
60 Normal speech at 1 meter (3 feet)
Quiet urban daytime 50 Large business office
Dishwasher, next room
Quiet urban nighttime 40 Theater, large conference room (background)
Quiet suburban nighttime 30 Library
Quiet rural night time 20 Bedroom at night, concert hall (background)
— 10 Broadcast/recording studio
Lowest threshold of human hearing 0 Lowest threshold of human hearing Notes: dBA = A-weighted decibels; kph = kilometers per hour; mph = miles per hour Source: Caltrans 2013.

MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: WHITTRAM NOISE AND VIBRATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

14933 3 DECEMBER 2022
The energy-equivalent sound level (Leq) for a defined period of time represents the constant value equal to the time- varying sound energy over the same perio d. For example, a 1 -hour Leq value would represent the time-averaged amount of energy contained in all the noise that occurred in that hour. L eq is thus an effective noise descriptor because of its ability to assess the total time-varying effects of noise on sensitive receptors (see Section 2.2). Lmax is the greatest sound level measured during a designated time interval or event. Commonly-used statistical sound levels include L50 (“L-fifty”) and L90 (“L-ninety”) that represent the sound level exceeded for a cumulative 50% and 90% of a measurement period, respectively. Hence, the former is often called the median sound level, while the latter is usually synonymous with either indistinct “background” sound from an amalgam of multiple distant sound sources or a specific and/or near continuous or “steady -state” noise source (e.g., operating electro -mechanical equipment).

Unlike the Leq metrics, Ldn and CNEL metrics always represent 24 -hour periods. Ldn and CNEL also differ from L eq because they apply a time-weighted factor designed to emphasize noise events that occur during the evening and nighttime hours (when speech and sleep disturbance is of more concern). “Time weighted” refers to the fact that Ldn and CNEL penalize noise that occurs during certain sensitive periods. In the case of CNEL, noise occurring during the daytime (7:00 a.m. –7:00 p.m.) receives no penalty. Noise during the evening (7:00 p.m. –10:00 p.m.) is penalized by adding 5 dB, while nighttime (10:00 p.m. –7:00 a.m.) noise is penalized by adding 10 dB. Ldn differs from CNEL in that the daytime period is defined as 7:00 a.m.–10:00 p.m., thus eliminating the evening period. Ldn and CNEL are the predominant criteria used to measure roadway noise affecting residential receptors. These two metrics generally differ from one another by no more than 0.5 dB to 1 dB, and as such are often treated as equivalent to one another.

2.1.2 Vibration
Vibration is an oscillatory motion through a solid medium in which the motion’s amplitude can be described in terms of displacement, velocity, or acceleration. Vibration can be a serious concern, causing buildings to shake and rumbling sounds to be heard. In contrast to noise, vibration is not a common environmental problem. It is unusual for vibration from sources such as buses and trucks to be perceptible, even in locations close to major roads. Some common sources of vibration are trains, buses on rough roads, and construction activities, such as blasting, pile driving, and heavy earthmoving equipment.

Several different methods are used to quantify vibration. Peak particle velocity (PPV) is defined as the maximum instantaneous peak of the vibration signal. PPV is most frequently used to describe vibration impacts to buildings and is usually measured in inches per second. The root mean square (RMS) amplitude is most frequently used to describe the effect of vibration on the human body and is defined as the average of the squared amplitude of the signal. Decibel notation (VdB) is commonly used to measure RMS vibration velocity. The decibel notation acts to compress the range of numbers required to describe and discuss vibration in an environmental assessment context.

High levels of vibration may cause physical personal injury or damage to buildings. However, vibration levels rarely affect human health. Instead, most people consider vibration to be an annoyance that can affect concentration or disturb sleep. In addition, high levels of vibration can damage fragile buildings or interfere with equipment that is highly sensitive to vibration (e.g., electron microscopes). Most perceptible indoor vibration is caused by sources within buildings, such as operation of mechanical equipment, movement of people, or slamming of doors. Typical

MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: WHITTRAM NOISE AND VIBRATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

14933 4 DECEMBER 2022
outdoor sources of perceptible vibration are construction equipment, steel -wheeled trains, and traffic on rough roads. If the roadway is smooth, the vibration from traffic is rarely perceptible.

2.2 Sensitive Receptors
Noise- and vibration-sensitive land uses are locations where people reside or where the presence of unwanted sound could adversely affect the use of the land. Residences, schools, hospitals, guest lodging, libraries, and some passive recreation areas would be considered noise and vibration sensitive and may warrant unique measures for protection from intruding noise.

Sensitive receptors near the Project site consist of residential land uses. Residences exist to the northeast, within approximately 400 feet of the Project site. Other, non-sensitive land uses in the Project vicinity include warehousing to the north, east, south, and west.

2.3 Existing Noise Conditions
Sound pressure level (SPL) measurements were conducted in the vicinity of the Project site on December 9, 2022, to characterize the existing outdoor ambient noise environment. Table 2 provides the locations, dates, and times the noise measurements were taken with a SoftdB-brand Piccolo II sound level meter equipped with a 0.5-inch, pre- polarized condenser microphone with pre -amplifier. This sound level meter (SLM) meets the current American National Standards Institute standard for a Type 2 (General Purpose) sound level meter. The accuracy of the sound level meter was verified using a field calibrator before and after the measurements, and the measurements were conducted with the microphone positioned approximately 5 feet above the ground.

Table 2. Measured Outdoor Ambient Noise Levels
Receptor Location Date Time
Leq
(dBA)
Lmax
(dBA)
ST1
Northeast of Project site, adjacent
to residences at Whittram Ave. and
Pecan Ave.
12/9/2022 11:55 a.m.–12:10 p.m. 72.0 80.3
Source: Attachment A
Notes: Leq = equivalent continuous sound level (time-averaged sound level); dBA = A-weighted decibels; Lmax = maximum sound level during the measurement interval.

One short-term noise measurement location (ST) was conducted in the vicinity of the Project site, as shown in Figure 3, Noise Measurement Locations. The measured Leq and maximum noise levels are provided in Table 2. The field noise measurement data sheets are provided in Attachment A. The primary noise sources at the sites identified in Table 2 consisted of traffic on local and distant roadways; other, secondary noise sources included distant industrial and distant aircraft. As shown in Table 2, the measured sound level was approximately 72.0 dBA Leq at ST1.

MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: WHITTRAM NOISE AND VIBRATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

14933 5 DECEMBER 2022
3 Regulatory Setting

3.1 Federal
There are no federal noise regulations applicable to the Project. However, various federal agencies have established rules and guidelines addressing noise and vibration. For example, in its Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment guidance manual (FTA 2018), the Federal Transit Administration offers guidance on the estimation of construction noise levels from a construction project site. It also provides suggested thresholds , which may be considered or adopted in the absence of locally quantifiable lim its, that include no more than 80 dBA Leq (over an 8-hour period) as received at a residential land use.

With respect to vibration, the same above -mentioned FTA manual provides guidance for the assessment of vibration impacts on people (i.e., potential annoyance), building damage risk, and disruption of vibration-sensitive processes (FTA 2018). Vibration impact criteria suggested by the Federal Transit Administration vary both with the frequency of vibration event occurrence and the sensitivity of the buil ding or process that may be exposed to groundborne vibration. By way of example, a modern commercial building constructed from reinforced concrete or steel would have a vibration impact threshold of 0.5 inches per second (ips) PPV, while a non -engineered timber or masonry structure more akin to a typical single -family or multifamily residence may have a more stringent 0.2 ips PPV vibration impact criteria against which project-attributed vibration due to construction could be assessed for the nearest such r eceptors in the surrounding community.

3.2 State
Government Code Section 65302(g)
California Government Code Section 65302(g) requires the preparation of a Noise Element in a general plan that identifies and appraises the noise problems in a community. The Noise Element must recognize the guidelines adopted by the Office of Noise Control in the State Department of Health Services and quantify, to the extent practicable, current and projected noise levels for major noise sources such as highways and freeways , primary arterials and major local streets, rail lines, airports, and industrial plants.

California General Plan Guidelines
The California General Plan Guidelines, published by the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, provides guidance for the acce ptability of specific land use types within areas of specific noise exposure. The Governor’s Office of Planning and Research guidelines are advisory in nature. Local jurisdictions, including the City, have the responsibility to set specific noise standards based on local conditions.

MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: WHITTRAM NOISE AND VIBRATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

14933 6 DECEMBER 2022

3.3 Local
City of Rancho Cucamonga Noise Ordinance
The Noise Ordinance included in Chapter 17.66 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code provides performance standards and noise control guidelines for operational activities with respect to Project construction and operation as received by Rancho Cucamonga receptors located northeast of the Project, as described below.

Operational Noise Standards
The Whittram Avenue Warehouse Project site, according to the Rancho Cucamonga zoning map, lies within Neo - Industrial (“NI”) and thus would be subject to “Class B” performance standards. Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Table 17.66.110-1, Industrial Performance Standards, provides the following regulations for “Class B”:

Noise Maximum
▪ 80 dB (anywhere on lot)
▪ 65 dB (at residential property line)
▪ Noise caused by motor vehicles is exempted from this standard.

Vibration
▪ All uses shall be operated so as not to generate vibration discernible without instruments by the average persons beyond the lot upon which the source is located. Vibration caused by motor vehicles, trains, and temporary construction or demolition is exempted from this standard.

Construction Noise Standards
The City Municipal Code has established restrictions on the time of day that construction activities can occur.

Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 1 7.66.060.D.4, states the following special exclusion from the provisions of this section:

4. Noise sources associated with, or vibration created by, construction, repair, remodeling, or grading of any real property or during authorized seismic surveys, provided said activities:
a. When adjacent to a reside ntial land use, school, church or similar type of use, the noise generating activity does not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday, and provided noise levels created do not exceed the noise standard of 65 dBA when measured at the adjacent property line.

Other Relevant Noise Standards
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.66.060.F.1, states the following residential noise standards:

MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: WHITTRAM NOISE AND VIBRATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

14933 7 DECEMBER 2022

1. Table 17.66.050-1 (Residential Noise Limits) includes the maximum noise limits in residential zones. These are the noise limits when measured at the adjacent residential property line (exterior) or within a neighboring home (interior).

Table 3. Rancho Cucamonga Residential Noise Limits
Location of
Measurement
Maximum Allowable
10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.

Exterior 60 dBA 65 dBA
Interior 45 dBA 50 dBA
Source: Rancho Cucamonga, California Municipal Code, Table 17.66.050-1.

Additional:
(A) It shall be unlawful for any person at any location within the city to create any noise or to allow the creation of any noise which causes the noise level when measured within any other fully enclosed (windows and doors shut) residential dwelling unit to exceed the interior noise standard in the manner described herein. (B) If the intruding noise source is continuous and cannot reasonably be discontinued or stopped for a time period whereby the ambient noise level can be determined, each of the noise limits above shall be reduced five dBA for noise consisting of impulse or simple tone noise.
4 Noise and Vibration Impacts Assessment

4.1 Thresholds of Significance
The following significance criteria, included in Appendix G of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (14 CCR 15000 et seq.), will determine the significance of a noise impact. Impacts related to noise would be significant if the proposed Project would result in:
▪ Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies.
▪ Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels. ▪ For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, the exposure of people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels.

4.2 Impact Analysis

4.2.1 Would the Project result in the generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the Project in excess of standards established in the local

MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: WHITTRAM NOISE AND VIBRATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

14933 8 DECEMBER 2022
general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
Less than Significant Impact. Noise generated by the Project would include short-term, on-site construction noise; off-site traffic noise along local roadways in the Project Area; and on-site mechanical noise from heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) equipment. As discussed below, these noise sources would not result in substantial temporary or permanent increases in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the Project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies.

Short -Term Construction Impacts
Construction noise and vibration are temporary phenomena. Construction noise and vibration levels vary from hour to hour and day to day, depending on the equipment in use, the operations being performed, and the distance between the source and receptor.

Noise generated by project construction equipment would include heavy equipment such as dozers, front-end loaders, backhoes, concrete mixers, and compressors that, when combined, can reach relatively high noise levels.

The number and mix of construction equipment would likely vary during the following phases: site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating.

With the noise sources identified above and using the same specific construction equipment assumptions as used for the air quality analysis, a noise analysis was performed using a spreadsheet version of the model developed by the Federal Highway Administr ation called the Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM) (FHWA 2008). Input variables for the Roadway Construction Noise Model consist of the receiver/land use types, the equipment type (e.g., backhoe, crane, truck), the number of equipment pieces, the dut y cycle for each piece of equipment (i.e., percentage of each time period the equipment typically is in operation), and the distance between the construction noise source and the sensitive receiver. The RCNM has default duty-cycle values for the various pieces of equipment that were derived from an extensive study of typical construction activity patterns. Those default duty-cycle values were used for this noise analysis.

Aggregate noise emission from proposed Project construction activities, broken down by sequential phase, was predicted at two evaluation distances to the nearest existing noise-sensitive receptor: 1) from the nearest position of the construction site boundary and 2) from the geographic center of the construction site, which serves as the time-averaged location or geographic acoustical centroid of active construction equipment for the phase under study. At the site boundary, this analysis assumes that up to only one piece of equipment of each listed type per phase will be involved in the construction activity for a limited portion of the 8-hour period. In other words, at such proximity, the operating equipment cannot “stack” or crowd the vicinity and still operate. For the acoustical centroid case, which intends to be a geographic average position for all equipment during the indicated phase, this analysis assumes that the equipment may be operating up to all 8 hours per day.

Table 4 provides a summary of the construction noise levels by each phase at the nearest noise-sensitive receptor locations. The input and output data are provided in A ttachment B. Based on the phases of construction, noise impacts associated with the Project are expected to result in relatively low noise levels at the nearby receptor locations compared to the daytime ambient noise measurements (as summarized in Table 2).

MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: WHITTRAM NOISE AND VIBRATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

14933 9 DECEMBER 2022
Table 4. Construction Noise Model Results Summary
Construction Phase
Estimated Noise Levels at Nearby Noise -Sensitive Receivers (dBA L eq 8 -hr) 8-Hour L eq at Nearest Noise -
Sensitive Receptor to Construction
Site Boundary
8-Hour L eq at Nearest Noise -
Sensitive Receptor to Acoustical
Centroid of Site
Demolition 58.7 65.0
Site Preparation 62.0 63.5
Grading 63.0 63.0
Building Construction 60.2 61.1
Paving 62.3 62.0
Architectural Coating 53.5 51.0
Source: Attachment B.

Notes: Leq 8-hr= 8-hour average equivalent noise level; dBA = A-weighted decibel.

As shown in Table 4, construction noise levels at the nearest noise-sensitive land use (residences to the northeast) are estimated to range from approximately 51.0 dBA Leq 8-hr during the architectural coating phase to approximately

65.0 dBA Leq 8-hr during the demolition phase.

As discussed previously, Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.66.060.D.4 does not permit construction noise that would create a noise disturbance between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. So long as the proposed Project would not conduct noisy construction activities between these restricted hours, this source of temporary noise would be considered a less than significant impact for the following reasons:
▪ The predicted construction noise levels appearing in Table 4 are well below the City’s municipal construction noise standard of 65 dBA; and
▪ The predicted construction noise levels for each phase of activity shown in Table 4 are less than the 72.0 dBA Leq sample of daytime measured existing outdoor sound level at survey position ST1 as exhibited in Table 2.

Off-Site Construction Activities
The Project would result in local, short -term increases in roadway noise as a result of construction traffic. Based on information developed as part of the Project’s air quality analysis, Project-related traffic would include workers commuting to and from the Project site as well as vendor and haul trucks bringing or removing materials. The highest number of average daily worker trips would be 76 trips, occurring during the building construction phase.

The highest number of average daily vendor truck trips would be 30 trips, also occurring during the building construction phase. The highest number of daily haul truck trips would be approximately 266 trips, occurring during the grading phase.

Based upon available data provided by the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Pl an, Arrow Route (north of and parallel to Whittram Avenue ) carries approximately 20,140 daily trips in the Project vicinity1. Comparing the 1 Per traffic volumes collected in September 2021 (City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan 2021).

MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: WHITTRAM NOISE AND VIBRATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

14933 10 DECEMBER 2022
maximum number of daily construction -related trips (266 haul truck trips) to the average daily traffic volume on Arrow Route (20,140 daily trips), the additional vehicle trips would amount to an increase of approximately 16.8 percent, accounting for the fact that heavy trucks are noisier than typical passenger vehicles 2. Based upon the fundamentals of acoustics, a doubling (i.e., a 100 percent increase) would be needed to result in a 3-dB increase in noise levels, which is the level corresponding to an audible change to the typical human listener. An increase in traffic v olumes on the order of 10.5 percent (all other things being equal) would amount to an increase of approximately 0.7 dB. Therefore, traffic related to construction activities would not result in a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the Project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies. Impacts from Project-related construction traffic noise would be less than significant. No mitigation measures are required.

Long -Term Operational Impacts
Long-term operational noise associated with the proposed Project includes on-site operational noise as well as project-generated traffic offsite. Each of these is addressed below.

On-Site Operational Noise
Outdoor Mechanical Equipment
The proposed warehouse spaces overall would generally not be served by heating , ventilation or air conditioning (HVAC) equipment. However, the floor plans include approximately 2,500 square feet of office and 2,500 square feet of mezzanine space (at the northwest corner of the south building) which would be served by HVAC equipment to provide interior comfort and ventilation for occupants. For the analysis of noise from HVAC equipment operation, a York Model ZF-072 package HVAC unit was used as a reference. Based upon the square footage of the office and mezzanine spaces ( 5000 square feet total ), it was assumed that two such unit s would be required for the office/mezzanine areas of building. The York Model ZF-072 package HVAC unit has a sound power rating of 83 dBA (Johnson Controls 2015) as seen in Table 5. Based on the warehouse roof design information provided, there will be a minimum 3-foot-high parapet extending along the perimeter of the roof, which would minimize sound from the HVAC unit at nearby noise-sensitive land uses.

Table 5. OBCF Components of York Model ZF -072
OBCF (Hz)
Sound Level per Octave Band Center Frequency (OBCF) Overall (dBA) 31.5 63 125 250 500 1,000 2,000 4,000 8,000
York Model ZF-072 n/a n/a 84.0 85.0 79.0 80.0 72.0 67.5 62.5 83 Notes: OBCF = Octave Band Center Frequency; n/a = not available Assuming all the equipment is operating simultaneously for a minimum period of 1 hour, the worst-case calculated noise level at the nearest noise-sensitive land uses is presented in Table 6. The maximum hourly noise level for all the HVAC equipment operati ng at the examined point in vicinity of the property would be 26.1 dBA Leq, which is substantially less than the daytime or nighttime noise standards for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Furthermore, 2 Per Table 3-3 (Equivalent Vehicles Based on Federal Highway Administration Traffic Noise Model Reference Energy Mean Emission Levels) of the Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement (Caltrans 2013).

MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: WHITTRAM NOISE AND VIBRATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

14933 11 DECEMBER 2022
this predicted rooftop HVAC noise level range is also well below the measured ambient noise level sample in the Project area.

At a closest source-to-receptor distance of 400 feet, HVAC noise levels would be approximately 26.1 dBA Leq. Noise from HVAC units would therefore, on the acoustical principle of logarithmic addition, not meaningfully contribute to existing ambient noise levels at noise-sensitive uses in the Project area.

Table 6. Noise Level at Nearest Noise Sensitive Receptors from Boundary Equipment Receiver Location Average Noise Level (dBA L eq) HVAC Northeast of Project Site (~400 ft) 26.1
Source: Attachment C.

Notes: dBA = A-weighted decibel; Leq = equivalent noise level; HVAC = heating, ventilation, and air conditioning.

The aggregate noise emission from these outdoor-exposed sound sources has been predicted with the Datakustik CadnaA sound propagation program. CadnaA is a commercially available software program for the calculation, presentation, assessment, and prediction of environmental noise based on algorithms and reference data per International Organization of Standardization (ISO) Standard 9613 -2, “Attenuation of Sound During Propagation Outdoors, Part 2: General Method of Calculation” (ISO 1996). The CadnaA computer software allows one to position sources of sound emission in a simulated three-dimensional (3-D) space atop rendered “blocks” of Project building masses having heights and footprints consistent with Project architectural plans and elevations. In addition to the above-mentioned sound source inputs and building -block structures that define the three -dimensional sound propagation model space, the following assumptions and parameter s are included in this CadnaA -supported stationary noise source assessment:
▪ Ground effect acoustical absorption coefficient equal to 0.5, which intends to represent an average or blending of ground covers that are characterized largely by hard reflective pavements and existing building surfaces across the Project site and the surroundings;
▪ Reflection order of 1, which allows for a single reflection of sound paths on encountered structural surfaces such as the modeled building masses;
▪ Calm meteorological conditions (i.e., no wind) with 68 degrees Fahrenheit and 50% relative humidity; and ▪ For purposes of impact assessment as evaluated herein, all modeled equipment is operating concurrently and continuously for a minimum period of 1 hour.

Noise modeling contours at the Project site are shown in Attachment C.

The results of the mechanical equipment operations noise analysis indicate that the Project would comply with the City’s municipal noise standards and would not result in a substantial noise increase, and on these bases support a finding of less than significant impact.

Parking Lot Activity
A comprehensive study of noise levels associated with surface parking lots was published in the Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management (Baltrënas et al. 2004). The authors of the study found that average noise levels during the peak period of use of a parking lot (generally in the morning with arrival of commuters and in the evening with the departure of commuters) were 47 dBA at 1 meter (3.28 feet) from the

MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: WHITTRAM NOISE AND VIBRATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

14933 12 DECEMBER 2022
outside boundary of the parking lot. The parking area would function as an area source for noise, which means that noise would attenuate at a rate of 3 dB with each doubling of distance. The employee parking area is proposed to be situated along the eastern and southern sides of the warehouse building, no closer than 2.5 feet from the nearest property boundary. At 100 feet from the nearest property boundary, parking lot noise levels would be approximately 32 dBA Leq. Consequently, noise generated by parking lot activities would be well below the 65 dBA Leq daytime or the 60 dBA Leq nighttime thresholds set forth by the Rancho Cucamonga municipal code.

Furthermore, the employee parking area would be located no closer than 700 feet from the nearest noise-sensitive land use (residences to the northeast). At a distance of 700 feet, parking lot noise levels would be approximately 24 dBA Leq. Noise from parking lot activity would be well below measured ambient noise levels.

Truck Loading Dock Activity
Noise levels associated with cargo truck delivery activity were also examined in the parking lot study (Baltrënas et al. 2004). The authors of the study concluded that average noise levels from t ruck loading/unloading areas were 96 dBA at 1 meter (3.28 feet) from the boundary of the truck activity area. Truck loading docks would not be located closer than 185 feet from the nearest Project property line to the north. Furthermore, truck loading docks would not be located closer than 690 feet from the nearest noise-sensitive land use (residences to the northeast). Using the outdoor attenuation rate of 6 dBA with each doubling of distance, truck loading activity along the western property boundary w ould average approximately 49.5 dBA Leq. Consequently, noise generated by truck loading operations would be below the 65 dBA Leq daytime threshold. At night, should such truck loading docks be active, the 49.5 dBA L eq predicted level would be below the 60 dBA Leq nighttime threshold. Thus, the predicted truck loading dock noise of 49.5 dBA would be compliant both during daytime and nighttime hours and therefore represent a less than significant impact.

Project -Generated Off -Site Traffic Noise
The Project would result in the addition of vehicle trips that could increase traffic noise. The Project is expected to generate 148 trips to the roadway system; in terms of passenger car equivalent (PCE), which accounts for truck percentages, the Project would generate 218 PCE. The Project would not result in a doubling of trips on any particular road segment, per existing traffic data provided in the Transportation Impact Analysi s (Dudek 202 2).

Typically, a doubling of the energy of a noise source, such as a doub ling of traffic volume, would increase noise levels by 3 dB.3 Given that it would result in only a modest increase in traffic on local and regional roadways, the Project is not expected to result in an increase of 3 dB or greater on roadways in the study area. The change in noise level due to the Project would not be audible. Therefore, impacts associated with off -site project-generated traffic noise would be less than significant.

In summary, construction and operational noise impacts from the proposed Project would be less than significant; no mitigation measures are required.
3 Under normal circumstances (i.e., outside of a controlled setting such as a listening laboratory), a 3 dB increase in noise levels is considered to be the smallest increase that is audible to the human ear, and a less than 3 dB increase in noise levels is considered to be a barely or non-audible increase.

MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: WHITTRAM NOISE AND VIBRATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

14933 13 DECEMBER 2022

4.2.2 Would the Project result in the generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
Less than Significant Impact. The main concern associated with groundborne vibration is annoyance; however, in extreme cases, vibration can cause damage to buildings, particularly those that are old or otherwise fragile. Some common sources of groundborne vibration are trains and construction activities such as blasting, pile-driving, and heavy earth-moving equipment. The primary source of groundborne vibration occurring as part of the proposed Project is construction activity.

Groundborne vibration information related to construction/heavy equipment activities has been col lected by Caltrans. Information from Caltrans indicates that transient vibrations (such as from construction activity) with approximately 0.035 inches per second PPV may be characterized as barely perceptible, and vibration levels of

0.24 inches per second PPV may be characterized as distinctly perceptible (Caltrans 2020). The heavier pieces of construction equipment, such as large bulldozers or hoe rams, would register up to approximately 0.089 inches per second PPV at a distance of 25 feet, and a clam shovel drop would measure up to approximately 0.202 inches per second PPV at a distance of 25 feet (FTA 2018).

Groundborne vibration is typically attenuated over relatively short distances. At the nearest existing noise/vibration- sensitive use, distance to t he nearest construction area (approximately 420 feet) and with the anticipated construction equipment, the vibration level would be approximately 0. 002 inches per second PPV. This vibration level would be well below the threshold of “barely perceptible” of 0.035 inches per second PPV.

Therefore, the major concern with construction vibration is related to building damage. Construction vibration as a result of the proposed Project would not result in structural building damage, which typically occurs at vibration levels of 0.5 inches per second PPV or greater for buildings of reinforced -concrete, steel, or timber construction.

There would be less than significant impacts related to groundborne vibration.

4.2.3 For a Project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the Project expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels?
Less than Significant Impact. The Project site is located approximately 4 miles northeast of Ontario International Airport. There are no public airports or private airfields within 2 miles of the Project, and the Project area is far from any aviation traffic noise contour greater than 65 dBA CNEL. Hence, people residing in the Project area or onsite workers involved in Project construction—would not be exposed to significantly impactful aviation traffic noise levels.

Impacts would be less than significant.
5 Conclusions
In summary, with implementation of standard construction and design techniques and practices, the Project’s short- and long-term noise and vibration impacts would be less than significant. No mitigation measures are required.

MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: WHITTRAM NOISE AND VIBRATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

14933 14 DECEMBER 2022
6 References Cited
14 CCR 15000–15387 and Appendices A–L. Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Baltrënas, Pranus et.al. (Pranas Baltrënas, Dainius Kazlauskas & Egidijus Petraitis). 2004. Testing on noise level prevailing at motor vehicle parking lots and numeral simulation of its dispersion, Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, 12:2, 63`-70
Caltrans (California Department of Transportation). 2013. Technical Noise Supplement to the Caltrans Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol. Division of Environmental Analysis, Environmental Engineering, Hazardous Waste, Air, Noise, Paleontology Office. September 2013.

Caltrans. 2020. Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual. Division of Environmental Analysis, Environmental Engineering, Hazardous Waste, Air, Noise, Paleontology Office. April 2020.

City of Rancho Cucamonga. General Plan. Update Draft EIR. Appendix 5.13-1 Noise and Vibration Techmical Memo. https://www.cityofrc.us/sites/default/files/2021-09/Appendix%205.13- 1_Noise%20and%20Vibration%20Technical%20Memo.pdf
City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2022a. Municipal Code. Title 17. Article IV. Chapter 17.66. Section 17.66.050 Noise Standards. https://www.cityofrc.us/public-safety/community-improvement/municipal-code City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2022b. Zoning Map https://www.cityofrc.us/everything-we-do/zoning-map Dudek. 2022. Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled Screening Analysis Memorandum for the Whittram Avenue Project.

FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2008. Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM), Software Version

1.1. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Environmental Measurement and Modeling Division.

FTA (U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration). 2018. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual. September 2018.

Johnson Controls. 2015. York Technical Guide. R-410A ZE/ZF/ZR/XN/XP SERIES, 3 - 6 TON 60 Hertz. 251933- YTG-Y-0715.

Project Site Plan
13045 Whittram Avenue Warehouse
FIGURE 2
Path: Z:\Projects\j1493301\MAPDOC\DOCUMENT\Noise\Figure 2 Project Site Plan.aio SOURCE: Herdman Architecture and Design, 2022.

Attachment A
Field Noise Measurement Data

Field Noise Measurement Data
Record: 1552
Project Name Whittram
Project # 14933
Observer(s)
Date 2022-12-09

Meteorological Conditions
Temp (F) 75
Humidity % (R.H.) 31.5
Wind Light
Wind Speed (MPH) 1.5
Wind Direction South
Sky Clear

Instrument and Calibrator Information
Instrument Name List Piccolo #1897
Instrument Name Piccolo #1897
Instrument Name Lookup Key Piccolo #1897
Manufacturer Soft dB inc.

Model Piccolo
Serial Number P0222050202
Calibration Date 5/02/2022
Calibrator Name (SB) LD CAL200
Calibrator Name (SB) LD CAL200
Calibrator Name Lookup Key (SB) LD CAL200
Calibrator Manufacturer Larson Davis
Calibrator Model LD CAL200
Calibrator Serial # 19952
GPS Assistance Used No
Pre-Test (dBA SPL) 93.6
Post-Test (dBA SPL) 94
Windscreen Yes
Weighting? A-WTD
Slow/Fast? Slow
ANSI? Yes

Monitoring
Record # 1
Site ID ST1
Site Location Lat/Long 34.094651, -117.519462
Begin (Time) 11:55:00
End (Time) 12:10:00
Other Lx (Specify Metric) L
Primary Noise Source Traffic
Other Noise Sources (Background) Birds, Distant Aircraft, Distant Conversations / Yelling, Distant Industrial, Distant Traffic Is the same instrument and calibrator being used
as previously noted?
Yes
Are the meteorological conditions the same as
previously noted?
Yes

Source Info and Traffic Counts
Number of Lanes 2
Lane Width (feet) 10
Roadway Width (feet) 20
Roadway Width (m) 6.1
Distance to Roadway (feet) 5
Distance to Roadway (m) 1.5
Distance Measured to Centerline or Edge of
Pavement?
Edge of Pavement
Roadway Type Avenue
Estimated Vehicle Speed (MPH) 45
Speeds Estimated by: Radar
Posted Speed Limit Sign (MPH) 40

Traffic Counts
Vehicle Count Summary A 52, MT 11, HT 31, B 0, MC 0
Select Method for Recording Count Duration Enter Manually Counting Both Directions? Yes
Count Duration (minutes) 15
Vehicle Count Tally
Select Method for Vehicle Counts Enter Manually
Number of Vehicles - Autos 52
Number of Vehicles - Medium Trucks 11
Number of Vehicles - Heavy Trucks 31
Number of Vehicles - Buses 0
Number of Vehicles - Motorcyles 0

Description / Photos
Terrain Mixed

Site Photos
Photo
Comments / Description ST1 South

Site Photos
Photo
Comments / Description ST1 East

Site Photos
Photo
Comments / Description ST1 North

Site Photos
Photo
Comments / Description ST1 West

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

Attachment B
Construction Noise Modeling Input/Output Files

Patriot Partners -13045 Whittram Avenue Warehouse
Noise and Vibration Technical Memorandum
Attachment B -- Construction Noise Modeling Input/Output Files To User: bordered cells are inputs, unbordered cells have formulae noise level limit for construction phase at occupied building, per FTA guidance = 80 allowable hours over which Leq is to be averaged (example: 8 per FTA guidance) = 8 Construction Activity Equipment Total
Equipment Qty
AUF % (from

FHWA RCNM)
Reference
Lmax @ 50 ft.
from FHWA
RCNM
Client Equipment
Description, Data
Source and/or Notes
Source to NSR
Distance (ft.)
Barrier / Topo
Insertion Loss (dB)
Distance-
Adjusted Lmax
Allowable Operation
Time (hours)
Allowable
Operation Time
(minutes)
Predicted 8-
hour Leq
Demolition Concrete Saw 1 20 90 Concrete/Industrial Sa 615 68.2 8 480 61 Excavator 3 40 81 615 59.2 8 480 60
Dozer 2 40 82 Rubber Tired Dozers 615 60.2 8 480 59
Total for Demolition Phase: 65.0
Site Preparation Dozer 3 40 82 Rubber Tired Dozers 705 59.0 8 480 60 Tractor 2 40 84 Tractors/Loaders/Back 705 61.0 8 480 60 Front End Loader 1 40 79 Tractors/Loaders/Back 705 56.0 8 480 52 Backhoe 1 40 78 Tractors/Loaders/Back 705 55.0 8 480 51 Total for Site Preparation Phase: 63.5
Grading Excavator 1 40 81 705 58.0 8 480 54
Grader 1 40 85 705 62.0 8 480 58
Dozer 1 40 82 Rubber Tired Dozers 705 59.0 8 480 55
Tractor 1 40 84 Tractors/Loaders/Back 705 61.0 8 480 57 Front End Loader 1 40 79 Tractors/Loaders/Back 705 56.0 8 480 52 Backhoe 1 40 78 Tractors/Loaders/Back 705 55.0 8 480 51 Total for Grading Phase: 63.0
Building Construction Crane 1 16 81 610 59.3 7 420 51
Man Lift 3 20 75 Forklifts 610 53.3 8 480 51
Generator 1 50 72 Generator Sets 610 50.3 8 480 47
Tractor 1 40 84 Tractors/Loaders/Back 610 62.3 7 420 58 Front End Loader 1 40 79 Tractors/Loaders/Back 610 57.3 7 420 53 Backhoe 1 40 78 Tractors/Loaders/Back 610 56.3 7 420 52 Welder / Torch 1 40 73 Welders 610 51.3 8 480 47
Total for Building Construction Phase: 61.1
Paving Concrete Mixer Truck 2 40 79 Cement Mortar Mixers 730 55.7 6 360 53 Paver 1 50 77 730 53.7 8 480 51
All Other Equipment > 5 HP 2 50 85 Paving Equipment 730 61.7 6 360 60 Roller 2 20 80 730 56.7 6 360 51
Tractor 1 40 84 Tractors/Loaders/Back 730 60.7 8 480 57 Front End Loader 0 40 79 Tractors/Loaders/Back 730 55.7 8 480 0 Backhoe 0 40 78 Tractors/Loaders/Back 730 54.7 8 480 0
Total for Paving Phase: 62.0
Architectural Coating Compressor (air) 1 40 78 610 56.3 6 360 51 Total for Architectural Coating Phase: 51.0
RCNM-emulator_14933 Dudek Project No. 14933 NSR (Centroid)

Patriot Partners -13045 Whittram Avenue Warehouse
Noise and Vibration Technical Memorandum
Attachment B -- Construction Noise Modeling Input/Output Files To User: bordered cells are inputs, unbordered cells have formulae noise level limit for construction phase at occupied building, per FTA guidance = 80 allowable hours over which Leq is to be averaged (example: 8 per FTA guidance) = 8 Construction Activity Equipment Total
Equipment Qty
AUF % (from

FHWA RCNM)
Reference
Lmax @ 50 ft.
from FHWA
RCNM
Client Equipment
Description, Data
Source and/or Notes
Source to NSR
Distance (ft.)
Barrier / Topo
Insertion Loss (dB)
Distance-
Adjusted Lmax
Allowable Operation
Time (hours)
Allowable
Operation Time
(minutes)
Predicted 8-
hour Leq
Demolition Concrete Saw 0 20 90 Concrete/Industrial Sa 460 70.7 8 480 0 Excavator 0 40 81 460 61.7 8 480 0
Dozer 1 40 82 Rubber Tired Dozers 460 62.7 8 480 59
Total for Demolition Phase: 58.7
Site Preparation Dozer 0 40 82 Rubber Tired Dozers 400 63.9 8 480 0 Tractor 1 40 84 Tractors/Loaders/Back 400 65.9 8 480 62 Front End Loader 0 40 79 Tractors/Loaders/Back 400 60.9 8 480 0 Backhoe 0 40 78 Tractors/Loaders/Back 400 59.9 8 480 0
Total for Site Preparation Phase: 62.0
Grading Excavator 0 40 81 400 62.9 8 480 0
Grader 1 40 85 400 66.9 8 480 63
Dozer 0 40 82 Rubber Tired Dozers 400 63.9 8 480 0
Tractor 0 40 84 Tractors/Loaders/Back 400 65.9 8 480 0
Front End Loader 0 40 79 Tractors/Loaders/Back 400 60.9 8 480 0 Backhoe 0 40 78 Tractors/Loaders/Back 400 59.9 8 480 0
Total for Grading Phase: 63.0
Building Construction Crane 0 16 81 460 61.7 7 420 0
Man Lift 0 20 75 Forklifts 460 55.7 8 480 0
Generator 0 50 72 Generator Sets 460 52.7 8 480 0
Tractor 1 40 84 Tractors/Loaders/Back 460 64.7 7 420 60 Front End Loader 0 40 79 Tractors/Loaders/Back 460 59.7 7 420 0 Backhoe 0 40 78 Tractors/Loaders/Back 460 58.7 7 420 0
Welder / Torch 0 40 73 Welders 460 53.7 8 480 0
Total for Building Construction Phase: 60.2
Paving Concrete Mixer Truck 0 40 79 Cement Mortar Mixers 420 60.5 6 360 0 Paver 0 50 77 420 58.5 8 480 0
All Other Equipment > 5 HP 1 50 85 Paving Equipment 420 66.5 6 360 62 Roller 0 20 80 420 61.5 6 360 0
Tractor 0 40 84 Tractors/Loaders/Back 420 65.5 8 480 0
Front End Loader 0 40 79 Tractors/Loaders/Back 420 60.5 8 480 0 Backhoe 0 40 78 Tractors/Loaders/Back 420 59.5 8 480 0
Total for Paving Phase: 62.3
Architectural Coating Compressor (air) 1 40 78 460 58.7 6 360 53 Total for Architectural Coating Phase: 53.5
RCNM-emulator_14933 Dudek Project No. 14933 NSR (Nearest)

Attachment C
HVAC Noise Modeling Contours

0 144
288
432
576
720
864
1008
1152
1296
1440
1584
1728
1872
2016
2160
2304
2448
2592
2736
2880
3024
3168
3312
3456
3600
3744
3888
4032
4176
4320
4464
4608
4752
4896
5040
5184
5328
5472
5616
5760
5904
6048
6192
6336
6480
6624
6768
6912
7056
7200
7344
7488
7632
7776
7920
8064
8208
8352
8496
8640
8784
8928
9072
9216
9360
9504
9648
9792
9936
10080
10224
10368
10512
10656
10800
10944
11088
11232
11376
11520
11664
11808
11952
12096
12240
12384
12528
12672
12816
12960
13104
13248
13392
13536
13680
13824
13968
14112
14256
14400
14544
14688
14832
14976
15120
15264
15408
15552
15696
15840
15984
16128
16272
16416
16560
16704
16848
16992
17136
17280
17424
17568
17712
17856
18000
18144
18288
18432
18576
18720
18864
19008
19152
19296
19440
19584
19728
19872
20016
20160
20304
20448
20592
20736
20880
21024
21168
21312
21456
21600
21744
21888
22032
22176
22320
22464
22608
22752
22896
23040
23184
23328
23472
23616
23760
23904
24048
24192
24336
24480
24624
24768
24912
25056
25200
25344
25488
25632
25776
25920
26064
26208
26352
26496
26640
26784
26928
27072
27216
27360
27504
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 70
71 72
73 74
75 76
77 78
79 80
81 82
83 84
85 86
87 88
89 90
91 92
93 94
95 96
97 98
99 100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
SOURCE: Google 2020; Dudek 2022
13045 Whittram Avenue Warehouse Project (Dudek No. 14933) Attachment C
0 95.5 191 Feet Aggregate On-Site Project Noise Emission A-weighted Sound
Pressure Level
(SPL)
35 dBA

Attachment E
Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled Screening
Analysis Memorandum

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
To: Kevin Rice, Patriot Development Partners
From: Dennis Pascua, Transportation Services Manager
Jeanney Keo, Transportation Planner
Subject: Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled Screening Analysis for the 13045 Whittram Avenue Warehouse, City of Rancho Cucamonga
Date: December 20, 2022
cc: Sean Kilkenny, Dudek
Attachments: Figure 1 – Project Location
Figure 2 – Site Plan

The following technical memorandum provides a trip generation and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) screening analysis for the proposed 13045 Whittram Avenue Warehouse (project), located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City).

This analysis has been prepared consistent with trip generation methodology from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) and the VMT guidelines per the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines (June 2020 ). In addition, a level of service (LOS) screening of the project was conducted per the City’s TIA Guidelines.

Per Senate Bill 743 (SB 743), the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) was directed to amend the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines to provide an alternative to LOS for evaluating transportation impacts. CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b) focuses on specific criteria (VMT) for determining the significance of transportation impacts. Under the new CEQA guidelines, LOS, or vehicle delay, is not used to determine a transportation impact, and VMT has been adopted as the most appropriate measure of transportation impacts.

The following analysis was conducted to determine whether a detailed transportation analysis would be required for the proposed project. As shown in the screening analysis below, the proposed project would not require a detailed VMT or LOS analysis due to its relatively low trip generation estimates. 1 Project Description
The project is the construction of a warehouse building of approximately 86,392 square feet (inclusive of all office and mezzanine space) located on the south side of Whittram Avenue, situated between Etiwanda Avenue on the east, and Hickory Avenue on the west within City limits. Regional access to the project area is provided by State Route 66 (SR-66) to the north, Interstate 10 (I-10) to the south, and Interstate 15 ( I-15) to the west. Local access to the project site is provided by Whittram Avenue. Figure 1 illustrates the project’s location and Figure 2 illustrates the project’s site plan.

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: TRIP GENERATION AND VMT SCREENING ANALYSIS FOR 13045 WHITTRAM AVENUE WAREHOUSE

14933 2 DECEMBER 2022
2 Trip Generation

2.1 Proposed Project
Table 1 provides a summary of trip generation estimates for the project based on trip rates from Trip Generation, 11th Edition (2021), for a Warehousing use (ITE Code 150). Additionally, the warehouse (non-cold storage buildings) truck fleet mix from the South Coast Air Quality Management District’s (SCAQMD) Warehouse Truck Trip Study Data Results and Usage (SCAQMD 2014) was used to estimate project-related truck traffic. Based on the SCAQMD data, passenger cars would account for 72.5% trips of the total trips generated by a warehouse facility, and truck trips would ac count for approximately 27.5% of the total trips. The total percentage of truck trips were further distinguished by 2-axle, 3-axle, and 4+ axle trucks per the SCAQMD study. These truck trips generated by the project were then converted to PCE trips by usin g appropriate PCE factors consistent with the County’s C ongestion Management Plan (CMP) guidelines.

Table 1. Project Trip Generation Summary
Land Use Size/Units

Daily
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
Trip Rates and Trip Generation
Warehousing1 per TSF 1.71 0.13 0.04 0.17 0.05 0.13 0.18 Land Use
Proposed Project 86.392 TSF 148 11 3 15 4 11 16
Land Use Vehicle Classification2 Daily
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
Non-PCE Trips Passenger Cars (72.5%) 107 8 2 10 3 8 11 2-axle Trucks (4.6%) 7 1 0 1 0 1 1
3-axle Trucks (5.7%) 8 1 0 1 0 1 1
4+axle Trucks (17.2%) 25 2 1 3 1 2 3
Total Non-PCE Trips 148 11 3 15 4 12 16
Project Trip Generation PCE
PCE Trips3 Passenger Cars (1.0 PCE) 107 8 2 10 3 8 11
2-axle Trucks (2.0 PCE) 14 1 0 1 2 1 3
3-axle Trucks (2.5 PCE) 21 2 0 2 0 2 2
4+axle Trucks (3.0 PCE) 76 6 2 8 1 6 7
Total PCE Trips 218 17 4 21 6 17 23
Notes: TSF = thousand square feet, PCE = passenger car equivalent Some of the totals may not match exactly due to rounding. 1 Trip rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 11th Edition, 2021. Land Use Code 150 – Warehousing. 2 Vehicle Mix and Percent from SCAQMD, Warehouse Truck Trip Study Data Results and Usage, July 2014. 3 Passenger Car Equivalent (PCE) factors per the San Bernardino County CMP, 2016.

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: TRIP GENERATION AND VMT SCREENING ANALYSIS FOR 13045 WHITTRAM AVENUE WAREHOUSE

14933 3 DECEMBER 2022
As shown in Table 1, the proposed project would generate approximately 148 daily trips, with 15 trips (11 inbound and 3 outbound) in the AM peak hour, and 16 trips (4 inbound and 12 outbound) in the PM peak hour. Adjusting for PCE, the project would generate approximately 218 daily PCE trips, 21 AM PCE peak hour trips (17 inbound and 4 outbound) and 23 PM PCE peak hour trips (6 inbound and 17 outbound). 3 LOS Screening Analysis
The City’s TIA Guidelines require that an LOS analysis be conducted to identify infrastructure improvements required to provide acceptable operations. Per the TIA Guidelines, a Traffic Report would be required if a project generates 50 or more trips to any intersection during either the AM or PM peak hours. Based on the project’s trip generation estimates calculated above, the proposed project would not require an LOS analysis and would likely not create a measurable LOS impact due to the low volume of vehicular traffic (less than 50 peak hour trips and PCE-adjusted trips). Therefore, a detailed LOS analysis would not be required. 4 VMT Screening Analysis
CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 states that “generally, vehicle miles traveled (VMT) is the most appropriate measure of transportation impacts,” and define VMT as “the amount and distance of automobile travel attributable to a project.” It should be noted “automobile” refers to on-road passenger vehicles, specifically cars and light trucks.

Heavy-duty truck VMT does not need to be included in the analysis, per Senate Bill 743 requirements. Other relevant considerations may include the effects of the project on transit and non-motorized traveled.

The City’s TIA Guidelines provide details on appropriate “screening thresholds” that can be used to identify when a proposed land use project is anticipated to result in a less than significant VMT impact without conducting a more detailed analysis. A land use project would need to only meet one of the three screening thresholds to result in a less than significant finding. The three VMT screening criteria are: 1) Transit Priority Area (TPA) Screening; 2) Low VMT Area Screening; and 3) Project Type Screening.

Based on the screening criteria, the project would meet the Project Type Screening criteria and therefore would screen out of further VMT analysis and can be presumed to have a less than significant impact to VMT:
• Project Type Screening - Projects generating less than 250 daily vehicle trips1: The proposed project is the construction and development of 86,392 SF of warehousing building, estimated to generate 148 daily trips (non-PCE), and adjusted to 218 daily PCE trips. The project would not generate 250 or more new daily trips and is a warehouse that is less than 143,000 SF therefore, the project would be screened out using this criterion and can be presumed to result in a less than significant VMT impact. 5 Conclusions
Based on the trip generation analysis above and adjusting for PCE, the proposed project would generate fewer than 50 AM or PM peak-hour trips (see Table 1). Adjusting for PCE, the project would generate approximately 21 AM PCE peak hour trips and 23 PM PCE peak hour trips. This project would be developed on a site that does not currently 1 This threshold ties to historical data and patterns of development in the City for small development projects, including consideration of a project's size (and/relative to) its potential impact on VMT within the City boundary

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: TRIP GENERATION AND VMT SCREENING ANALYSIS FOR 13045 WHITTRAM AVENUE WAREHOUSE

14933 4 DECEMBER 2022
have any buildings, thus would not have any existing trip credit s. Per the City’s TIA guidelines and project trip generation estimates, the proposed project would not be required to prepare an LOS analysis.

Based on the trip generation analysis above, the project would not generate 250 or more new daily trips (non-PCE and PCE). Therefore, the proposed project would be screened out from conducting further VMT analysis and is presumed to have a less than significant VMT impact. Thus, the project would not require any mitigation. 6 References
City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2020. City of Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines.

ITE (Institute of Transportation Engineers). 2021. Trip Generation Manual. 11th ed.

OPR (California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research). 2018. Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA. December 2018. Accessed May 2020. http://opr.ca.gov/ docs/20190122-743_Technical_Advisory.pdf.

San Bernardino Associated Governments. San Bernardino County Congestion Management Program. June 2016. https://www.gosbcta.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2016-Congestion-Management-Plan-.pdf SCAQMD (South Coast Air Quality Management District). 2014a. Warehouse Truck Trip Study Data Results and Usage.

Inland Empire Logistics Council. June 2014. https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/ high-cube-warehouse-trip-rate-study-for-air-quality-analysis/final-ielc_6-19-2014.pdf?sfvrsn=2.

SCAQMD. 2014b. Warehouse Truck Trip Study Data Results and Usage, Back Up Slides. Stakeholder Working Group. July 17, 2014. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/ high-cube-warehouse-trip-rate-study-for-air-quality-analysis/finalswg071714backup.pdf.

Project Site Plan
13045 Whittram Avenue Warehouse
FIGURE 2
Path: Z:\Projects\j1493301\MAPDOC\DOCUMENT\Noise\Figure 2 Project Site Plan.aio SOURCE: Herdman Architecture and Design, 2022.

ATTACHMENT 3

Attachment 4
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-011

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,

RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROV DESIGN
REVIEW DRC2025-00320 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
DRC2025-00323 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF ONE
INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE BUILDING TOTALING 86,194
SQAURE FEET ON AN APPROXIMATELY 5.2 ACRE SITE

LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WHITTRAM AVENUE

BETWEEN ETIWANDA AVENUE AND HICKORY AVENUE AT
13045 WHITTRAM AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF – APNs: 0229-162-04, -05, -11, -12, and -

13. A. Recitals.

1. Herdman Architecture + Design on behalf of Patriot Partners filed Design Review DRC2025-00320 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2025-00323 applications as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject entitlements request is referred to as "the application."

2. On the 22nd day of April 2026, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date.

3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

B. Resolution.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:

1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.

2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on April 22, 2026, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application is the development of a 5.2-acre site for the development of an 86,194 square foot building, consisting of 81,194 square feet of warehouse floor area and 5,000 square feet of office area (2,500 square feet on the ground floor and 2,500 square feet of mezzanine space) and associated improvements; and
b. The project site is generally located on the south side of Whittram Avenue between Etiwanda Avenue and Hickory Avenue at 13045 Whittram Avenue. The project site is a generally square shaped lot and is currently vacant; and c. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows:

PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2026-0XX
DRC2025-00320 and DRC2025-00323 – Patriot Partners Whittram April 22, 2026

6 8
6 1

3. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve Design Review DRC2025-00320 as a part of the application and makes the following findings pursuant to the Development Code Section 17.20.040 in support of the recommendation:
a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan. The General Plan land use designation is Neo-Industrial Employment District, which is intended for light industrial uses with low environmental impacts in modern, smaller size and scale buildings. The proposed project is to develop a modernly designed warehouse building that is less than 100,000 square feet and has been evaluated to have less than significant environmental impacts in regard to biological resources, traffic, noise, air, or water quality; and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the zone in which the site is located. The project site is within the Neo-Industrial zone which is intended for small scale, context sensitive warehousing and distribution. The proposed project will be developed to support warehousing and distribution within an existing industrial area; and
c. The proposed project is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions and development standards of the Development Code. The project complies with the requirements of the Development Code including, but not limited to, building height, floor area ratio, building footprint, setbacks, and open space; and
d. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project has been evaluated for impacts to biological resources, traffic, noise, air, and water quality and has been found to not produce significant impacts.

Additionally, the development will be subject to the industrial performance standards outlined in Chapter 17.66 of the Development Code in order to prevent impacts to adjacent sites.

4. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve Conditional Use Permit DRC2025-00323 as part of the application and makes the following findings pursuant to the Development Code Section 17.20.060 in support of the recommendation:

Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Vacant Neo-Industrial Employment
District Neo-Industrial (NI)
North Trucking Facility Industrial Employment District Neo-Industrial (NI) South Manufacturing
Warehouse
Neo-Industrial Employment
District
Industrial
Employment (IE)
East Auto Repair Neo-Industrial Employment
District Neo-Industrial (NI)
West
Construction Material
Storage Yard / Trucking
Facility
Neo-Industrial Employment
District Neo-Industrial (NI)

PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2026-0XX
DRC2025-00320 and DRC2025-00323 – Patriot Partners Whittram April 22, 2026

6 8
6 1
a. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan land use designation is Neo-Industrial Employment District, which is intended for light industrial uses with low environmental impacts in modern, smaller size and scale buildings. The proposed project is to develop a modernly designed warehouse building that is less than 100,000 square feet and has been evaluated to have less than significant environmental impacts in regard to biological resources, traffic, noise, air, or water quality; and b. The proposed use is consistent with the purposes of the Development Code and the purposes of the zone in which the site is located. The project site is within the Neo-Industrial zone which is intended for small scale, context sensitive warehousing and distribution. The proposed project will be developed to support warehousing and distribution within an existing industrial area; and
c. The site is physically suitable for the type, density, and intensity of the use being proposed including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints that would make conduct of the use undesirable. The project site is well suited for the proposed warehouse building as it meets current site, building, and clean energy standards, is bordered by sites similarly zoned for industrial development of similar intensity and scale, and will put in place necessary offsite improvements such that access to the site and sufficient utilities are provided; and d. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed use would be compatible with the existing and other permitted uses in the vicinity including transportation and service facilities. The project site is bound by existing industrial developments to the north, south, east, and west and is generally located within a longtime established industrial area of the City. The proposed use complies with the applicable provisions of the Development Code, will be required to comply with performance standards, and the size and design of proposed project would be both compatible and complementary to the existing and future uses in the vicinity; and
e. Granting the permit would not constitute a nuisance or be injurious to or detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the property is located. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity as the proposed project complies with all applicable development standards, is located in an existing industrial area, has been evaluated to not cause significant impacts to biological resources, traffic, noise, air, or water quality, and will be required to comply with the performance standards specific to industrial uses outlined in Chapter 17.66 of the Development Code; and f. The proposed use will not pose an undue burden on the city services, including police, fire, streets, and other public utilities, such that the city is unable to maintain its current level of service due to the use. The area is already adequately served by existing fire stations, and no new or altered facilities would be needed to serve the allowed land uses with the area. As presented, the Project related impacts to public services including fire, police, schools, libraries, and parks, would be less than significant with conformance to General Plan policies. Furthermore, the proposed project would pay all applicable development fees associated with fire protection services and would comply with all regulations governing fire prevention and safety, such as those established in the California Building Code, California Fire Code, California Health and Safety Code, and California Occupational Safety and Health Regulation, thus reducing demand for

PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2026-0XX
DRC2025-00320 and DRC2025-00323 – Patriot Partners Whittram April 22, 2026

6 8
6 1
RCFPD services. Therefore, Project impacts related to public services are less than significant; and
g. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). It was determined that the project was categorically exempt from CEQA under Section 15332 – Infill Development Projects. A Class 32 Exemption report was prepared to determine that significant impacts would not be generated to biological resources, traffic, noise, air, or water quality.

5. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council make the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with approval of the application:
a. The Planning Department staff determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 32 Exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 – Infill Development Projects, which includes infill development projects that are 1) consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and polices as well as applicable zoning designation regulations, 2) are developed within City limits on a site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, 3) the site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species, 4) approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air, or water quality, and 5) the site can adequately be served by all required utilities and public services; and b. A CEQA Section 15332 Exemption report (May 2023) was prepared by Dudek, an environmental consulting firm retained by the City. Staff thoroughly reviewed the exemption documentation and concluded that the proposed project would not result in significant environmental impacts, including those related to the biological resources, traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. The following support each of the corresponding findings for the Class 32 Exemption:
1) The General Plan Land Use and Zoning designations for the project site are Neo-Industrial Employment District and Neo-Industrial (NI), respectively. The General Plan designation is intended for light industrial uses within small, modern warehouses that generate minimal impacts to adjacent properties. The project complies with the City’s development standards and design criteria for the Neo-Industrial zone as well, including, but not limited to setbacks, height, floor area ratio, and open space. The development and operation of a warehouse/distribution facility of the proposed size and configuration is complaint with the land use designations for the site.
2) Although the subject site is 5.2 acres and exceeds the five-acre threshold for the Class 32 Exemption, only 4.1 acres of the site will be developed as a 1.1-acre easement is present on the site and would not allow for any type of development or improvements to occur. Due to the inability to develop this portion of the property, it is not considered in the total acreage of the site for CEQA purposes. The site is also surrounded on all sides with similar industrial development and existing infrastructure, surrounding it with urbanized uses.
3) As the project site is proposed for a site that is surrounded by other

PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2026-0XX
DRC2025-00320 and DRC2025-00323 – Patriot Partners Whittram April 22, 2026

6 8
6 1
industrial developments and is located within an urbanized area, existing vegetation and animal species on the site are limited. The project site has not been found to have a significant value as a habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species. 4) The technical studies performed for the Class 32 Exemption supported the exemption by confirming that there would not be significant effects to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality as a result of the proposed project.
5) The project site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services as it will be located within a developed portion of the City that already has significant infrastructure in place to support further development. Improvements will be made offsite and to the site to further accommodate utilities and public services for the project area; and c. Although the Class 32 Exemption was prepared for the now expired entitlements, Design Review DRC2022-00156 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2023-00142, the current entitlements propose an identical project to the previously reviewed entitlements for which the Class 32 Exemption was supported. The current applications do not include any alterations to site size, building square footage, building footprint, circulation, or surrounding environmental conditions. As such, the City has determined that the project continues to meet all criteria for the Class 32 Exemption. No further environmental review is required as the existing exemption report prepared by Dudek captures the current entitlements and sufficiently evaluates the project.

6. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 above, this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

7. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.

APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22nd DAY OF APRIL 2026.

PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:

Alvin Boling, Chairman
ATTEST:

Jennifer Nakamura, Secretary
I, Jennifer Nakamura, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of

PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2026-0XX
DRC2025-00320 and DRC2025-00323 – Patriot Partners Whittram April 22, 2026

6 8
6 1
the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of April 2026, by the following vote-to-wit:

AYES: COMMISSIONERS:

NOES: COMMISSIONERS:

ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:

ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:

Attachment 5

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN
REVIEW DRC202 5-00320 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
DRC2025-00323 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF ONE
INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE BUILDING TOTALING 86,194
SQAURE FEET ON A N APPROXI MATELY 5.2 ACRE SITE

LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WHITTRAM AVENUE

BETWEEN ETIWANDA AVENUE AND HICKORY AVENUE AT
13045 WHITTRAM AVENUE ; APN s: 0229-162-04, -05, -11, -12, and -13.

A. Recitals.

1. The applicant, Herdman Architecture + Design on behalf of Patriot Partners filed Design Review DRC202 5-00320 and Conditional Use Permit DRC202 5-00323 applications as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject entitlements request is referred to as "the application."

2. On the 22nd day of April 2026, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date recommending the City Council approve the project as proposed.

3. On the 3 rd day of June 2026, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date.

4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

B. Resolution.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:

1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.

2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on June 3, 2026, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:

a. The application is the development of a 5.2-acre site for the development of an 86,194 square foot building, consisting of 81,194 square feet of warehouse floor area and 5,000 square feet of office area ( 2,500 square feet on the ground floor and 2,500 square feet of mezzanine space) and associated improvements; and

b. The project site is generally located on the south side of Whittram Avenue between Etiwanda Avenue and Hickory Avenue at 13045 Whittram Avenue. The project site is a generally square shaped lot and is currently vacant; and

CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2026-0XX
DRC2025-00320 and DRC2025-00323 – Patriot Partners Whittram June 3, 2026

c. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows:

3. The City Council hereby approves Design Review DRC202 5-00320 as a part of the application and makes the following findings pursuant to the Development Code Section

17.20.040 in support of approval:

a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan. The General Plan land use designation is Neo -Industrial Employment District, which is intended for light industrial uses with low environmental impacts in modern, smaller size and scale buildings . The proposed project is to develop a modernly designed warehouse building that is less than 100,000 square feet and has been evaluated to have less than significant environmental impacts in regard to biological resources, traffic, noise, air, or water quality; and

b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the zone in which the site is located. The project site is within the Neo -Industrial zone which is intended for small scale, context sensitive warehousing and distribution. The proposed project will be developed to support warehousing and distribution within an existing industrial area; and

c. The proposed project is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions and development standards of the Development Code. The project complies with the requirements of the Development Code including, but not limited to, building height, floor area ratio, building footprint, setbacks, and open space; and

d. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project has been evaluated for impacts to biological resources, traffic, noise, air, and water quality and has been found to not produce significant impacts.

Additionally, the development will be subject to the industrial performance standards outlined in Chapter 17.66 of the Development Code in order to prevent impacts to adjacent sites.

4. The City Council hereby approves Conditional Use Permit DRC2025-00323 as part of the application and makes the following findings pursuant to the Development Code Section

17.20.060 in support of approval:

Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Vacant Neo-Industrial Employment
District Neo-Industrial (NI)
North Trucking Facility Industrial Employment District Neo-Industrial (NI) South Manufacturing
Warehouse
Neo-Industrial Employment
District
Industrial
Employment (IE)
East Auto Repair Neo-Industrial Employment
District Neo-Industrial (NI)
West
Construction Material
Storage Yard / Trucking
Facility
Neo-Industrial Employment
District Neo-Industrial (NI)

CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2026-0XX
DRC2025-00320 and DRC2025-00323 – Patriot Partners Whittram June 3, 2026

a. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan land use designation is Neo -Industrial Employment District, which is intended for light industrial uses with low environmental impacts in modern, smaller size and scale buildings . The proposed project is to develop a modernly designed warehouse building that is less than 100,000 square feet and has been evaluated to have less than significant environmental impacts in regard to biological resources, traffic, noise, air, or water quality; and

b. The proposed use is consistent with the purposes of the Development Code and the purposes of the zone in which the site is located. The project site is within the Neo-Industrial zone which is intended for small scale, context sensitive warehousing and distribution. The proposed project will be developed to support warehousing and distribution within an existing industrial area; and

c. The site is physically suitable for the type, density, and intensity of the use being proposed including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints that would make conduct of the use undesirable. The project site is well suited for the proposed warehouse building as it meets current site, building, and clean energy standards, is bordered by sites similarly zoned for industrial development of similar intensity and scale, and will put in place necessary offsite improvements such that access to the site and sufficient utilities are provided; and

d. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed use would be compatible with the existing and other permitted uses in the vicinity including transportation and service facilities. The project site is bound by existing industrial developments to the north, south, east, and west and is generally located within a longtime established industrial area of the City . The proposed use complies with the applicable provisions of the Development Code, will be required to comply with performance standards, and the size and design of proposed project would be both compatible and complementary to the existing and future uses in the vicinity; and
e. Granting the permit would not constitute a nuisance or be injurious to or detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the property is located. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity as the proposed project complies with all applicable development standards, is located in an existing industrial area, has been evaluated to not cause significant impacts to biological resources, traffic, noise, air, or water quality, and will be required to comply with the performance standards specific to industrial uses outlined in Chapter 17.66 of the Development Code; and

f. The proposed use will not pose an undue burden on the city services, including police, fire, streets, and other public utilities, such that the city is unable to maintain its current level of service due to the use. The area is already adequately served by existing fire stations, and no new or altered facilities would be needed to serve the allowed land uses with the area. As presented, the Project related impacts to public services including fire, police, schools, libraries, and parks, would be less than significant with conformance to General Plan policies. Furthermore, the proposed project would pay all applicable development fees associated with fire protection services and would comply with all regulations governing fire prevention and safety, such as those established in the California Building Code, California Fire Code, California Health and Safety Code, and California Occupational Safety and Health Regulation, thus reducing demand for

CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2026-0XX
DRC2025-00320 and DRC2025-00323 – Patriot Partners Whittram June 3, 2026

RCFPD services. Therefore, Project impacts related to public services are less than significant; and
g. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CE QA). It was determined that the project was categorically exempt from CEQA under Section 15332 – Infill Development Projects. A Class 32 Exemption report was prepared to determine that significant impacts would not be generated to biological resources, traffic, noise, air, or water quality.

5. The City Council hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with approval of the application:

a. The Planning Department staff determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 32 Exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 – Infill Development Projects, which includes infill development projects that are 1) consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and polices as well as applicable zoning designation regulations, 2) are developed within City limits on a site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, 3) the site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species, 4) approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air, or water quality, and 5) the site can adequately be served by all required utilities and public services; and

b. A CEQA Section 15332 Exemption report (May 2023) was prepared by Dudek, an environmental consulting firm retained by the City. Staff thoroughly reviewed the exemption documentation and concluded that the proposed project would not result in significant environmental impacts, including those related to the biological resources, traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. The following support each of the corresponding findings for the Class 32 Exemption:
1) The General Plan Land Use and Zoning designations for the project site are Neo-Industrial Employment District and Neo-Industrial (NI), respectively. The General Plan designation is intended for light industrial uses within small, modern warehouses that generate minimal impacts to adjacent properties. The project complies with the City’s development standards and design criteria for the Neo-Industrial zone as well, including, but not limited to setbacks, height, floor area ratio, and open space. The developm ent and operation of a warehouse/distribution facility of the proposed size and configuration is complaint with the land use designations for the site.
2) Although the subject site is 5.2 acres and exceeds the five-acre threshold for the Class 32 Exemption, only 4.1 acres of the site will be developed as a 1.1-acre easement is present on the site and would not allow for any type of development or improvements to occur. Due to the inability to develop this portion of the property, it is not considered in the total acreage of the site for CEQA purposes. The site is also surrounded on all sides with similar industrial development and existing infrastructure, surrounding it with urbanized uses.
3) As the project site is proposed for a site that is surrounded by other

CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2026-0XX
DRC2025-00320 and DRC2025-00323 – Patriot Partners Whittram June 3, 2026

industrial developments and is located within an urbanized area, existing vegetation and animal species on the site are limited. The project site has not been found to have a significant value as a habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species.
4) The technical studies performed for the Class 32 Exemption supported the exemption by confirming that there would not be significant effects to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality as a result of the proposed project.
5) The project site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services as it will be located within a developed portion of the City that already has significant infrastructure in place to support further development. Improvements will be made offsite and to the site to further accommodate utilities and public services for the project area; and

c. Although the Class 32 Exemption was prepared for the now expired entitlements, Design Review DRC2022-00156 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2023-00142, the current entitlements propose an identical project to the previously reviewed entitlements for which the Class 32 Exemption was supported. The current applications do not include any alterations to site size, building square footage, building footprint, circulation, or surrounding environmental conditions. As such, the City has determined that the project continues to meet all criteria for the Class 32 Exemption. No further environmental review is required as the existing exemption report prepared by Dudek captures the current entitlements and sufficiently evaluates the project.

6. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 above, this City Council hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

7. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.

APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 3RD DAY OF JUNE 2026.

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

BY:

L. Dennis Michael, Mayor

ATTEST:

Kim Sevy, City Clerk

I, Kim Sevy, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 3rd day of June 2026,

CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2026-0XX
DRC2025-00320 and DRC2025-00323 – Patriot Partners Whittram June 3, 2026

by the following vote-to-wit:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBER:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBER:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBER:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBER:

Conditions of Approval
Community Development Department
Project #: DRC2025-00320
Project Name: Patriot Partners 13045 Whittram
Location: 13045 WHITTRAM AVE - 022916205-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:

Planning Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
The Design Review and Conditional Use Permit authorize the development of one 86,194 square foot industrial warehouse building on approximately 5.2 acres of land within the Neo -Industrial (NI) zone, located on the south side of Whittram Avenue between Etiwanda Avenue and Hickory Avenue at 13045 Whittram Avenue; APNs: 0229-162-04, -05, -11, -12, and -13.

1. The project shall comply with all project recommendations as outlined in the categorical exemption prepared by Dudek (May 2023).

2. A Final Map shall be approved and recorded with the San Bernardino County Recorders Office prior to issuance of Building Permits.

3. All baseline requirements listed under AB98 for new logistic facilities must be complied with. These include the following regulations:
- Anti-idling signs indicating a three -minute heavy -duty truck engine idling restriction shall be posted at logistics use developments along entrances to the site and at the truck loading bays. - Signs shall be installed at all heavy -duty truck exit driveways directing truck drivers to the truck route as indicated in the truck routing plan, as described in Section 65098.4, and in the state highway system. - Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, a facility operator shall establish and submit for approval to the planning director or equivalent position for the city, county, or city and county a truck routing plan to and from the state highway system based on the latest truck route map of the city, county, or city and county. The truck routing plan shall describe the operational characteristics of the use of the facility operator, including, but not limited to, hours of operation, types of items to be stored within the building, and proposed truck routing to and from the facility to designated truck routes that, to the greatest extent possible, avoid passing sensitive receptors. The truck routing plan shall include measures, such as signage and pavement markings, queuing analysis, and enforcement, for preventing truck queuing, circling, stopping, and parking on public streets. The facility operator shall be responsible for enforcement of the truck routing plan. A revised truck routing plan shall be submitted to the planning director or equivalent position prior to a business license being issued by the city, county, or city and county for any new tenant of the property. The planning director or equivalent position shall have discretion to determine if changes to the truck routing plan are necessary, including, but not limited to , any additional measures to alleviate truck routing and parking issues that may arise during the life of the facility.

4. Standard Conditions of Approval
www.CityofRC.us
Printed: 4/14/2026

Project #: DRC2025-00320
Project Name: Patriot Partners 13045 Whittram
Location: 13045 WHITTRAM AVE - 022916205-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:

Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll -up doors and service doors to match main building colors.

5. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and /or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and /or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and /or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans.

6. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity.

7. www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 19Printed: 4/14/2026

Project #: DRC2025-00320
Project Name: Patriot Partners 13045 Whittram
Location: 13045 WHITTRAM AVE - 022916205-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:

Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
The applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City, and/or any of its officials , officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials and instrumentalities thereof (collectively “Indemnitees” ), from any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other actions and proceedings (whether legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature ), and alternative dispute resolutions procedures (including, but not limited to, arbitrations, mediations, and other such procedures ) (collectively “Actions” ), brought against the City, and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set aside, void, or annul, the action of, or any permit or approval issued by, the City and /or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City ), for or concerning the project, whether such actions are brought under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), State Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivisions Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure Section 1085 or 1094.5, or any other state, federal, or local statute, law, ordinance, rule, regulation, or any decision of a competent jurisdiction. This indemnification provision expressly includes losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to this approval, the Planning Director’s actions, the Planning Commission’s actions, and/or the City Council’s actions , related entitlements, or the City’s environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit , action, or other legal proceeding. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve , which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City’s defense, and that the applicant shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the applicant of any Action brought and City shall cooperate with applicant in the defense of the Action. In the event such a legal action is filed challenging the City’s determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due.

8. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet (s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction /grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect.

9. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval.

10. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 2 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted.

11. www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 19Printed: 4/14/2026

Project #: DRC2025-00320
Project Name: Patriot Partners 13045 Whittram
Location: 13045 WHITTRAM AVE - 022916205-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:

Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
This project is subject to public art requirement outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code .

Prior to the issuance of building permits (for grading or construction ), the applicant shall inform the Planning Department of their choice to install public art, donate art or select the in -lieu option as outlined in 17.124.020.D.

If the project developer chooses to pay the in -lieu fee, the in -lieu art fee will be invoiced on the building permit by the City and shall be paid by the applicant prior to building permit issuance.

If the project developer chooses to install art, they shall submit, during the plan check process, an application for the art work that will be installed on the project site that contains information applicable to the art work in addition to any other information as may be required by the City to adequately evaluate the proposed the art work in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 17.124.

If the project developer chooses to donate art, applications for art work donated to the City shall be subject to review by the Public Art Committee which shall make a recommendation whether the proposed donation is consistent with Chapter 17.124 and final acceptance by the City Council.

No final approval, such as a final inspection or the a issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, for any development project (or if a multi -phased project, the final phase of a development project) that is subject to this requirement shall occur unless the public art requirement has been fulfilled to the satisfaction of the Planning Department.

12. For multi -family residential and non -residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on -site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right -of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage.

13. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right -of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.

14. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger.

15. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls.16.

The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department.

17. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species.

18. www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 19Printed: 4/14/2026

Project #: DRC2025-00320
Project Name: Patriot Partners 13045 Whittram
Location: 13045 WHITTRAM AVE - 022916205-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:

Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building.

19. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department.

20. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82.

21. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet.22.

All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop).

23. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Director, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn -around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way.

24. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards.

25. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings /units/buildings with open spaces /plazas/ recreational uses.

26. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and /or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance.

27. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards.

28. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing.

29. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations.

30. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and /or proposed shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line -of-sight of the main entrance. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services /Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls shall be constructed of similar material used on-site to match the building.

31. www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 19Printed: 4/14/2026

Project #: DRC2025-00320
Project Name: Patriot Partners 13045 Whittram
Location: 13045 WHITTRAM AVE - 022916205-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:

Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Downspouts shall not be visible from the exterior of any elevations of the buildings. All downspouts shall be routed through the interior of the building walls.

32. All above ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall also be above ground, pad mounted, meeting current SCE design standards.

33. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner , homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits.

34. A detailed on -site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits .

Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties.

35. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy.

36. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first.

37. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.

38. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits.

39. Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
The street lights shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights.

1. www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 19Printed: 4/14/2026

Project #: DRC2025-00320
Project Name: Patriot Partners 13045 Whittram
Location: 13045 WHITTRAM AVE - 022916205-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:

Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
Development Impact Fees Required:

The following Development Impact fees shall be paid prior to Building permit issuance:

Transportation: South Zone
Police Department Facilities
RCFPD Facilities, Apparatus and Equipment
Non-Residential Affordable Housing Development
Drainage Fee: Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area
Estimated Total: $1,526,494.00
**Note: This is an estimate of the development impact fees. Development Impact Fees placed are subject to change annually and based on final approved square footage.**

2. All existing private easements located within the property boundaries shall be quit -claimed or supplemented with non-interference letters prior to final map approval.

3. Standard Conditions of Approval
Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline):
44 total feet on Whittram Avenue from centerline to right-of-way

4. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer.

5. The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one parcel prior to issuance of Building Permits.

6. ** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant must identify if they are self -hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and / or demolition project.

Contact Marissa Ostos, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information.

Instructions and forms are available at the City 's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering / Environmental Programs / Construction & Demolition Diversion Program.

7. www.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 19Printed: 4/14/2026

Project #: DRC2025-00320
Project Name: Patriot Partners 13045 Whittram
Location: 13045 WHITTRAM AVE - 022916205-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:

Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
A signed consent and waiver form to join and /or form the appropriate Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 3B) shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer.

This parcel is required to be annexed into CFD 2022-01 district (Street Lighting Services) and CFD 2022-02 district (Industrial Services Area) for ongoing services and maintenance of the industrial areas, and appurtenant facilities. This condition needs to be completed before the Final Map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Any annexation cost shall be borne by the developer. To start the annexation process, please contact Kelly Guerra at 909-774-2582.

8. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: “All improvements within the public right -of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans .” If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern.

9. Construct the following perimeter street improvements on Whittram Avenue including, but not limited to:
12-ft right-of-way widening to meet the required 44-ft street dedication Removal, reconstruction and installation of A .C. Pavement for a 32-ft half -width street improvement curb to curb
Curb & Gutter
Side-walk (6-ft)
Driveway(s)
Street Lights
Street Trees
Fiber Optic Conduit
Other:

Traffic Control, Signage and Striping: Provide any new and replacement traffic control devices, signs, pavement markings, and crosswalks in the area of the project as required and as instructed by the City Engineer.
*Notes: ( a) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. ( b) Driveway(s) shall comply to City Standards and Driveway policy.

10. www.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 19Printed: 4/14/2026

Project #: DRC2025-00320
Project Name: Patriot Partners 13045 Whittram
Location: 13045 WHITTRAM AVE - 022916205-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:

Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval.

11. Improvement Plans and Construction:
a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits , whichever occurs first.
b. Prior to any work being performed in public right -of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring .

Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer.

Notes:
1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart , unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer.
2) Conduit shall be 3-inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer.
f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check.

12. www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 19Printed: 4/14/2026

Project #: DRC2025-00320
Project Name: Patriot Partners 13045 Whittram
Location: 13045 WHITTRAM AVE - 022916205-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:

Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: “Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Title Sheet (typically Sheet 1).” Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans.

Whittram Avenue:

Botanical Name (To be determined in plan check)
Common Name (To be determined in plan check)
Min. Grow Space (To be determined in plan check)
Spacing (To be determined in plan check)
Size (To be determined in plan check)
Qty. (To be determined in plan check)
Construction Notes for Street Trees:
1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector.
3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department.

Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only.

13. Street improvement plans per City Standards for all private streets shall be provided for review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being performed on the private streets, fees shall be paid and construction permits shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required.

14. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and /or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees.

15. Developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement for electric service and shall construct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and shall construct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility requirements and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility shall be the electrical service provider for all project related development.

16. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary.17.

Install fiber optic conduit, vaults, and manholes on Whittram Avenue per Standard Drawings 135-137.

Public improvement plans shall show the location and limits of the conduits, vaults and manholes with construction notes.

18. www.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 19Printed: 4/14/2026

Project #: DRC2025-00320
Project Name: Patriot Partners 13045 Whittram
Location: 13045 WHITTRAM AVE - 022916205-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:

Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is required for work within its right-of-way.

19. Building and Safety Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC .1.

Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness.

2. Roofing materials shall be Class "A."3.

Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions.4.

Submit five complete sets of plans. Plans must be wet stamped and signed.5.

Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance.

6. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Services Department.

7. Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the Grading & Drainage Plan Requirements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout “Information for Grading Plans and Permits."

1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan (s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan.

2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report.

3. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits.

4. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit.

5. www.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 19Printed: 4/14/2026

Project #: DRC2025-00320
Project Name: Patriot Partners 13045 Whittram
Location: 13045 WHITTRAM AVE - 022916205-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:

Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be located outside of the public right of way.

6. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan /Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit.

7. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner (s) to construct wall (s) on property line (s) or provide a detail (s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line.

8. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code.

9. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on -site construction where possible , and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings.

10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code.

11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code.

12. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official.

13. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary.

14. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code.

15. www.CityofRC.us Page 12 of 19Printed: 4/14/2026

Project #: DRC2025-00320
Project Name: Patriot Partners 13045 Whittram
Location: 13045 WHITTRAM AVE - 022916205-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:

Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Grading Inspections:
a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner /representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations:
i) The bottom of the over-excavation;
ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit.

16. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan ) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC 1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R 317.1(2) and CBC 2512.1.2/CRC R 703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code.

17. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner (s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set.

18. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site.

19. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices.

20. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off -site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit.

21. www.CityofRC.us Page 13 of 19Printed: 4/14/2026

Project #: DRC2025-00320
Project Name: Patriot Partners 13045 Whittram
Location: 13045 WHITTRAM AVE - 022916205-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:

Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off -site drainage acceptance easements(s) from adjacent downstream property owner (s) or discharge flows in a natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted) and shall provide the Building and Safety Official a drainage study showing the proposed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit.

22. Roof water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit.

23. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall demonstrate that the storm water run -off will not adversely affect the downstream properties and that the water may legally discharge to the downstream properties. The engineer of record shall show on the final permitted grading and drainage plan one (1) or more of the following items are met: a) There is sufficient downstream capacity to accept the proposed storm water flows and that the downstream property owner have provided permission to accept the upstream storm water flows; b) a legal document /entity exists allowing developed storm water flows to be discharged to the property lower in elevation; c) a storm drain system to safely convey the storm water flows to a public storm drain system without causing flooding to adjacent property(ies).

24. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan.

25. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP).

26. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval.

27. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed “Acceptable”. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official.

28. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s “Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan” shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder’s Office.

29. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document.

30. The land /property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager.

31. A final project -specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s “Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan” shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit.

32. www.CityofRC.us Page 14 of 19Printed: 4/14/2026

Project #: DRC2025-00320
Project Name: Patriot Partners 13045 Whittram
Location: 13045 WHITTRAM AVE - 022916205-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:

Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall show the locations of all roof downspout drains. if required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall include filters.

33. Prior to the issuance of a building permit or Engineering Services Department issued right of way permit, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a final project specific water quality management plan for review and approval, and shall have said document recorded with the San Bernardino County Recorder's Office.

34. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable.

35. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP’s). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement (s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document.

36. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the “Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP” section of the final project-specific water quality management plan.

37. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of “Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet” located in Appendix D “Section VII – Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, …” of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer’s recommendations for Appendix D, Table VII .3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors”.

38. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted “San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans”.

39. www.CityofRC.us Page 15 of 19Printed: 4/14/2026

Project #: DRC2025-00320
Project Name: Patriot Partners 13045 Whittram
Location: 13045 WHITTRAM AVE - 022916205-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:

Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
The final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be prepared as a Phased WQMP and shall include all phases of the project. Construction of the storm water treatment structural devices may be constructed as construction progresses.

40. The subject project, shall accept all existing off -site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those flows through or around the project site. If existing off -site storm water drainage flows mix with any on-site storm water drainage flows, then the off -site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the on-site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm water drainage flows from the project site.

41. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department.

42. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre -treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document.

43. The direction of storm water flow flowing across the permeable paver storm water treatment device is a small area compared to the total area of each of the permeable paver locations. Prior to issuance of the grading permit and approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) the engineer of record shall provide a design which will allow the storm water to evenly flow into the permeable paver gravel base (such as a catch basin with a perforated pipe running under the length of the permeable paver area, or a similar design ), and shall show the design on the grading plan and shall provide a detail on the WQMP site and drainage plan showing how the storm water is evenly distributed into the permeable paver gravel base.

44. www.CityofRC.us Page 16 of 19Printed: 4/14/2026

Project #: DRC2025-00320
Project Name: Patriot Partners 13045 Whittram
Location: 13045 WHITTRAM AVE - 022916205-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:

Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
GROUND WATER PROTECTION:

Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No .

R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads:

Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection):

Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater:
a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives.
b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre -treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration.
c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. ( NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as ‘ 100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics ), OR, by means of 5,000sqft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes’).
d. Unless adequate pre -treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity {77}, areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic ); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities.
e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular {78} repair or maintenance activities {79}, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work.
f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination.
g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells.
h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050.

45. www.CityofRC.us Page 17 of 19Printed: 4/14/2026

Project #: DRC2025-00320
Project Name: Patriot Partners 13045 Whittram
Location: 13045 WHITTRAM AVE - 022916205-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:

Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES – CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE – Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 5.106.1 (Storm water pollution prevention) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code:

Newly construction projects and additions which disturb less than one acre of land shall prevent the pollution of stormwater runoff from the construction activities through one or more of the following measures:

5.106.1.1 Local Ordinance – Comply with a lawfully enacted stormwater management and /or erosion control ordinance.

5.106.1.2 Best Management Practices (BMP) – Prevent the loss of soil through wind or water erosion by implementing an effective combination of erosion and sediment control and good housekeeping BMP.

1. Soil loss BMP that should be considered for implementation as appropriate for each project include , but are not limited to, the following:
a. Scheduling construction activity.
b. Preservation of natural features, vegetation and soil. c. Drainage swales or lined ditches to control stormwater flow. d. Mulching or hydroseeding to stabilize disturbed soils. e. Erosion control to protect slopes.
f. Protection of storm drain inlets (gravel bags or catch basin inserts). g. Perimeter sediment control (perimeter silt fence, fiber rolls). h. Sediment trap or sediment basin to retain sediment on site. i. Stabilized construction exits.
j. Wind erosion control.
k. Other soil loss BMP acceptable to the enforcing agency.

2. Good housekeeping BMP to manage construction equipment, materials and wastes that should be considered for implementation as appropriate for each project include, but are not limited to, the following:
a. Material handling and waste management.
b. Building materials stockpile management.
c. Management of washout areas (concrete, paints, stucco, etc.). d. Control of vehicle/equipment fueling to contractors staging area. e. Vehicle and equipment cleaning performed off site.
f. Spill prevention and control.
g. Other housekeeping BMP acceptable to the enforcing agency (City of Rancho Cucamonga).

46. www.CityofRC.us Page 18 of 19Printed: 4/14/2026

Project #: DRC2025-00320
Project Name: Patriot Partners 13045 Whittram
Location: 13045 WHITTRAM AVE - 022916205-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:

Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES – CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE – Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 5.106.10 (Grading and paving) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code:

Construction plans shall indicate how site grading or a drainage system will manage all surface water flows to keep water from entering buildings. Examples of methods to manage surface water include, but are not limited to, the following:

1. Swales.

2. Water collection and disposal systems.

3. French drains.

4. Water retention gardens.

5. Other water measures which keep surface water away from buildings and aid in groundwater recharge.

Exception: Additions and alterations not altering the drainage path.

47. www.CityofRC.us Page 19 of 19Printed: 4/14/2026

DATE: June 3, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Elisa C. Cox, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Jennifer Gracia, Deputy City Manager
Michael Parmer, Engagement and Special Programs Director Erika Lewis-Huntley, Management Analyst III
SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve the Homelessness Response Strategy. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council approve the Homelessness Response Strategy, which provides a comprehensive, data-informed, and coordinated framework to prevent and reduce homelessness in Rancho Cucamonga.

BACKGROUND:

Homelessness continues to be a growing challenge across California and the Inland Empire, driven by rising housing costs, economic instability, and gaps in behavioral health and supportive services. While Rancho Cucamonga has historically maintained a relatively low rate of homelessness, recent trends have reflected increases in both visible homelessness and housing instability.

The City has taken a proactive and collaborative approach to addressing homelessness through partnerships with regional agencies, service providers, and community organizations. Existing efforts include participation in the San Bernardino City and County Continuum of Care (CoC), deployment of specialized outreach teams including the Solutions Oriented Policing (SOP) Team and the Community Outreach and Support Team (COAST), and investments in prevention and stabilization programs.

Recognizing the need for a more coordinated and strategic approach, the City developed the Homelessness Response Strategy to guide policy, program development, and resource allocation. The Strategy builds upon existing efforts and aligns with key City planning documents, including the General Plan, Housing Element, Consolidated Plan, and Healthy RC Strategic Plan.

The Strategy is also aligned with regional planning efforts led by the San Bernardino City and County CoC, the County of San Bernardino, the San Bernardino Council of Governments (SBCOG), and other regional partners, ensuring a coordinated and consistent approach to addressing homelessness across jurisdictions. As local conditions continue to evolve, a coordinated and proactive strategy is needed to guide the City’s response, align resources, and position Rancho Cucamonga to effectively address current and future homelessness challenges.

ANALYSIS:

3 5
0 0
The Homelessness Response Strategy provides a comprehensive framework informed by data, stakeholder input, and best practices to better understand the local landscape of homelessness and identify practical short- and long-term actions to prevent homelessness, support individuals currently experiencing homelessness, and reduce housing instability in Rancho Cucamonga. The City engaged a wide range of stakeholders through focus groups and key informant interviews to ensure the perspectives of those most impacted by homelessness, including individuals with lived experience and those working to address it, were reflected. These included City departments, public safety personnel, service providers, nonprofit and faith-based organizations, the business community, and residents. The Strategy reflects a balanced approach that prioritizes prevention, coordinated response, and long-term housing solutions while maintaining public health and safety. The Strategy was also informed by analysis of local and regional data sources, including Point-in-Time Count (PITC) data, Inland SoCal United Way 2-1-1 call trends, housing and economic indicators, and regional homelessness data.

Key Findings
The following key findings emerged through stakeholder engagement, analysis of local and regional data, and broader regional trends, and helped shape the priorities and recommendations included in the Strategy:
•Recent years have shown an overall increase in homelessness locally, reflecting broader regional and statewide trends.
•Prevention-focused strategies that stabilize households before homelessness occurs are critical to reducing housing instability and homelessness. •Limited availability of affordable housing, supportive housing, and low-barrier shelter options continue to present challenges in addressing homelessness and housing instability.
•Many individuals experiencing homelessness have little to no income, underscoring the importance of economic stabilization and workforce pathways. •Community data indicated strong demand for homelessness prevention resources, housing assistance, and other supportive services, including food assistance, utility support, and mental health services.
•Mental health and substance use challenges continue to create barriers to service engagement, housing stability, and long-term recovery for some individuals experiencing homelessness.
•A growing share of individuals experiencing homelessness are older adults, highlighting the need for senior-focused prevention and housing strategies. •Stakeholder engagement identified the need for stronger cross-agency coordination, expanded prevention and diversion efforts, improved access to housing and supportive services, and more strategic alignment of limited resources. •Regional collaboration and long-term investment will be critical to sustaining progress and improving outcomes for individuals and families experiencing homelessness.

Strategic Framework and Focus Areas
The Strategy is grounded in a set of guiding principles and focus areas that together establish the City’s overall approach to addressing homelessness.

The Strategy is guided by the following principles:

3 5
0 0
•Dignity & Equity: All residents deserve access to safe, stable housing and supportive services, regardless of circumstance or background.
•Compassionate Service: Homelessness should be addressed with compassion, professionalism, and a holistic person-centered approach. •Prevention First: It is more effective, humane, and cost-efficient to prevent homelessness than to respond to its consequences.
•Community-Driven Solutions: Strategies should be shaped by the voices of residents, businesses, service providers, and people with lived experience, and supported through ongoing community awareness and engagement.

•Data-Informed & Evidence-Based: Policies, programs, and resource allocation should be guided by local data, measurable outcomes, and evidence-based practices, with regular evaluation and adjustment.
•Systems Coordination & Collective Impact: Solutions require both regional and cross- sector collaboration using a shared framework with clear goals and accountability to ensure coordinated, effective action.
•Safety & Balanced Approach: The safety and well-being of the entire community - including residents, businesses, and people experiencing homelessness - is a priority.

Addressing homelessness requires a balanced approach that includes supportive services and fair enforcement, while recognizing that homelessness is not a crime.

The guiding principles establish the overall values and approach that shape the City’s homelessness response efforts. Building on these principles, the Strategy identifies five interconnected focus areas intended to guide implementation through both short-term and long- term actions. Together, these focus areas provide a practical framework for strengthening prevention efforts, improving coordination across systems and providers, expanding access to housing and supportive services, and supporting long-term housing stability for residents experiencing or at risk of homelessness.
•Prevention and Early Intervention: Prevent individuals and families from becoming homeless by addressing root causes and stabilizing at-risk households. •Crisis Response and Outreach: Ensure that people experiencing homelessness can access immediate shelter, health services, and outreach that meets them where they are. •Housing Solutions: Increase access to affordable and supportive housing to help residents maintain housing stability and support individuals and families exiting homelessness. •Service Coordination and Funding Alignment: Maximize impact by aligning local funding, improving coordination, and measuring results.
•Equity, Engagement, and Accountability: Embed lived experience, equity, and community input into homelessness strategies and implementation efforts.

Implementation

3 5
0 0
The City has already begun advancing several initiatives aligned with this Strategy. Staff has applied for State Prohousing Incentive Program (PIP) funding to support homelessness prevention and rapid rehousing efforts. The City is also participating in the development of the West End Regional Navigation Center, currently under construction and anticipated to open in early 2027, which will provide shelter and supportive services. In addition, the City is participating in the San Bernardino Regional Housing Trust through the San Bernardino Council of Governments (SBCOG) to support the development and preservation of affordable housing.

Implementation of the Strategy will continue through a phased approach, incorporating both short- term and long-term actions, strengthening coordination across departments and partners, and leveraging available funding opportunities. The Strategy is intended to serve as a flexible framework that will continue to evolve in response to funding opportunities, legislative changes, community needs, and program outcomes.

2026 Point-in-Time Count Update
Since completion of the Homelessness Response Strategy, final results from the 2026 Point-in- Time Count (PITC) have been released. The data indicates a decrease in the number of individuals experiencing homelessness in Rancho Cucamonga, marking the first year-over-year reduction following several years of increases. This decline is an encouraging indicator and may reflect the impact of expanded outreach, regional coordination, and targeted prevention efforts.

Continued implementation of a coordinated, long-term strategy will be important to maintain this trend and support lasting reductions in homelessness. The Homelessness Response Strategy is designed to be flexible and data-informed. The 2026 PITC data will be incorporated into implementation efforts, performance tracking, and future updates to ensure the City’s approach remains responsive to current conditions.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Adoption of the Homelessness Response Strategy does not commit the City to a specific future funding level at this time. Implementation will be phased and supported through a combination of existing City funding and external funding opportunities, including federal, state, regional, and grant programs. Future actions identified in the Strategy may require additional funding and will be brought to the City Council for consideration as part of the annual budget process or through separate agenda items.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

This Homelessness Response Strategy supports the City Council’s vision of creating an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city rich in opportunity for all to thrive. The Strategy advances Council values related to a safe and healthy community, excellent quality of life, community engagement, and the relentless pursuit of improvement through coordinated, compassionate, and data-informed approaches to addressing homelessness.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 - Homelessness Response Strategy (DRAFT)

HOMELESSNESS

RESPONSE STRATEGY
DRAFT
ATTACHMENT 1

DRAFT

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction ..........................................................................................................4 Strategic Framework .......................................................................................5 Community and Stakeholder Engagement ....................................6 Understanding Homelessness in Rancho Cucamonga ............7 Regional Systems and Data Framework ............................................11 Affordable Housing & Homelessness Prevention .....................20 Programs & Services ......................................................................................22 Encampment Response and Community Engagement......24
Building Organizational Capacity .........................................................26 Strategic Focus Areas and Implementation Strategies .........28 Conclusion ............................................................................................................29 DRAFT

Homelessness is a growing challenge for communities across California, including Rancho Cucamonga.

While the City has long been recognized for its high quality of life, safe neighborhoods, and forward-thinking planning, the rise in housing instability and visible homelessness in recent years highlight the need for a coordinated and compassionate response.

This Homelessness Response Strategy (“Strategy”) reflects the Rancho Cucamonga City Council’s commitment to maintaining a healthy, inclusive, and thriving community. It supports the City’s vision of being a world-class community by advancing solutions that uphold dignity, improve public health and safety, and enhance overall well-being for all residents—housed and unhoused alike.

Homelessness is not a single-issue problem; it reflects a range of local and regional conditions, including the rising cost of housing, stagnant wages, unemployment and underemployment, gaps in mental health and substance use treatment services, and limited resources for vulnerable populations. It also impacts neighborhoods, businesses, public spaces, schools, and public health and safety.

Introduction
Grounded in data, shaped by community voices, and
informed by best practices, this Strategy builds on existing City efforts while identifying opportunities to expand impact, strengthen coordination, and ensure that future investments are equitable and effective. The Strategy includes analysis of local homelessness data and demographic trends, an
overview of services and funding considerations, and strategic recommendations organized around prevention, crisis response, housing, and systems change.

As Rancho Cucamonga continues to evolve, this Strategy reflects the City’s belief that homelessness is not inevitable—and that with the right policies, partnerships, and persistence, progress is possible. It is also intentionally aligned with the City’s broader planning framework, including the General Plan, Housing Element, Consolidated Plan, and Healthy RC Strategic Plan.

By building on these guiding documents, the City can ensure that homelessness response strategies are coordinated,
fiscally responsible, and integrated with long-term
community goals.

The purpose
of this Strategy is to
provide a comprehensive
framework for understanding
the local landscape of
homelessness and identify
practical short- and
long-term actions that the
City and its partners can take
to prevent homelessness,
support those currently
experiencing it, and reduce
the number of individuals
living without stable housing
in Rancho Cucamonga.
4 DRAFT

Strategic Framework
The Homelessness Response Strategy is grounded in the
understanding that homelessness is a local issue with regional drivers—and local governments play a critical role in mitigating its impacts and reducing its prevalence, with the ultimate goal of achieving long-term prevention. This framework outlines the guiding principles that shape the City’s approach, inform decision-making, and provide a foundation for the strategic focus areas and actions described in the strategy.

Guiding Principles
The City of Rancho Cucamonga’s approach to homelessness is guided by the following principles:
• Dignity & Equity: All residents deserve access to safe, stable housing and supportive services, regardless of
circumstance or background.
• Compassionate Service: Homelessness should be
addressed with compassion, professionalism, and
a holistic person-centered approach.
• Prevention First: It is more effective, humane, and
cost-efficient to prevent homelessness than to respond
to its consequences.
• Community-Driven Solutions: Strategies should be
shaped by the voices of residents, businesses, service
providers, and people with lived experience, and
supported through ongoing community awareness
and engagement.
• Data-Informed & Evidence-Based: Policies, programs,
and resource allocation should be guided by local data, measurable outcomes, and evidence-based practices,
with regular evaluation and adjustment.
• Systems Coordination & Collective Impact: Solutions
require both regional and cross-sector collaboration
using a shared framework with clear goals and
accountability to ensure coordinated, effective action. • Safety & Balanced Approach: The safety and well-being of the entire community—including residents, businesses, and people experiencing homelessness—is a priority.

Addressing homelessness requires a balanced approach
that includes supportive services and fair enforcement, while recognizing that homelessness is not a crime.
5 DRAFT

To ensure the strategies outlined in this plan are
grounded in both data and lived experience, the
City engaged a wide range of stakeholders to
ensure the perspectives of those most impacted
by homelessness, as well as the people working
to address it were reflected.

These included City departments,
public safety personnel, service
providers, non-profit and faith-based
organizations, the business
community, and residents.

The City conducted a series of stakeholder focus
groups and key informant interviews. A service
provider and community partner focus group was
conducted, bringing together representatives from
housing agencies, behavioral health providers, non-profit organizations, and local faith-based institutions. This session also included residents and individuals with lived experience of homelessness, ensuring that the strategies and themes identified reflected on-the-ground realities and unmet needs.

Key informant interviews were also conducted with City departments, including the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department’s Solutions-Oriented Policing (SOP) Team and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District (“RCFD”).

Interviews also included representatives from the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s HOPE (Homeless Outreach and Proactive Engagement) Team, who bring valuable insight into the day-to-day challenges and opportunities related to law enforcement’s role in addressing homelessness on a countywide level.

These engagements emphasized several common themes that emerged across nearly all stakeholder groups including the need for stronger cross-agency coordination, increased prevention and diversion efforts, more strategic use of limited funding, and housing solutions that allow residents to remain connected to their community.

In addition to these shared priorities, stakeholders also identified several key themes and challenges, including:
• The growing role of first responders in crisis stabilization. • The need for more low-barrier housing options and wraparound services (supportive services that address residents’ housing, health, and social needs). • Opportunities to improve cross-agency collaboration and service alignment. • Challenges related substance use and mental health disorders, senior homelessness, and discharge planning from hospitals or other institutional settings.

Stakeholders also shared insights on service gaps, emerging populations (such as seniors living in vehicles), and the barriers that prevent individuals from accessing stable housing. They emphasized the need for coordinated referrals, culturally responsive outreach, and upstream prevention efforts. The feedback gathered during this process played a critical role in shaping the priorities and recommendations outlined in this strategy.

Community and Stakeholder Engagement
6 DRAFT

Federal Definitions and Classifications
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) identifies two core categories of homelessness:
• Unsheltered Homelessness: Individuals living in places not intended for human habitation, such as streets, parks, vehicles, abandoned buildings, or encampments. • Sheltered Homelessness: Individuals residing in emergency shelters, transitional housing, or other temporary accommodations provided through social service programs.

HUD and service providers further classify homelessness by duration and recurrence, which helps determine appropriate interventions.
• Transitional Homelessness: Typically associated with a short-term housing crisis, often lasting less than three months, resulting from sudden life changes such as job loss, eviction, or domestic violence. Individuals in this group often need short-term assistance and stabilize relatively quickly. • Episodic Homelessness: Involves individuals who have experienced at least three periods of homelessness within a year, often linked to untreated health conditions, limited family support, or unstable employment. This group is particularly at risk of falling into chronic homelessness without timely intervention.
• Chronic Homelessness: Defined as prolonged or repeated homelessness experienced by individuals with a disabling condition (e.g., mental illness, substance use disorder, physical disability). These individuals have either been continuously homeless for at least 12 months or have had four or more episodes over the past three years, totaling 12 months. These individuals often cycle through emergency rooms, jail systems, and crisis response services, resulting in high public costs and challenges for law enforcement, healthcare systems, and local government.

Understanding
Homelessness in
Rancho Cucamonga
Homelessness is not a one-size-fits-all condition;
rather, it is a dynamic and often cyclical
experience that varies by duration, cause, and
severity. For local governments, this complexity
requires tailored solutions, targeted investments,
and sustained cross-sector and regional
coordination. As Rancho Cucamonga strengthens
its commitment to addressing homelessness,
a shared understanding of its various forms and
the systems that influence it is essential to
developing effective solutions.
7 DRAFT