Agenda packet — Rancho Cucamonga City Council, June 3, 2026 (part 2 of 12)

Page 3 ends

3 4
7 6
coordination of permitting with the Army Corps of Engineering for work within flood control right- of-way. It is unclear whether these services will be needed at this time. However, in order to streamline the design process and avoid delays in processing of permits, staff is recommending that the City Council authorize the City Engineer to award the Optional Task, or a portion thereof, if the additional services are determined to be needed.

A copy of the Professional Services Agreement is held on file with the City Clerk’s office.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The anticipated project design costs are shown in the table below.

Expenditure Category Amount
Design Contract $ 561,180
Contingency (10%) $56,120
Optional Task Item $ 100,160
Estimated Project Design Costs $717,460
A total of $500,000 from Transportation Fund (124) is budgeted, made available and shown in the approved Fiscal Year 2025/26 Budget. Funding available for the proposed agreement is identified under the Major Projects Program (MPP) account number listed below:

Account No. Funding Source Description Amount
F124 CC307 SC7004
PID2216-124
Transportation Fund
(124)
Advanced Traffic
Management System
Phase 3 Project
$ 500,000
A deficit of $217,460 exists and must be funded to proceed with the Professional Services Agreement for design and construction support services for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase 3 Project (including contingency and the Optional Task). An appropriation from the Transportation Fund (124) in the amount of $217,460 to Project Account No. F124 CC307 SC7004 PID2216-124 is necessary to cover the anticipated Professional Services Agreement costs as listed below:

Account No. Funding Source Description Amount
F124 CC307 SC7004
PID2216-124
Transportation Fund
(124)
Advanced Traffic
Management System
Phase 3 Project
$ 217,460
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

This project reflects the City Council’s core values by planning for a sustainable future, strengthening infrastructure to support our commitment to prosperity, and fostering a safe and healthy community.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map

Page 133 ends

ATTACHMENT 1

ADVANCED TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM (ATMS) PHASE 3 PROJECT

VICINITY MAP

NOT TO SCALE

Project Site

Hermosa Avenue

Page 134 ends

DATE: June 3, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Elisa C. Cox, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Peter Castro, Deputy City Manager
Jennifer Nakamura, CNU-A, Planning Director
Sophia Serafin, AICP, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Consideration to Execute a Density Bonus Agreement Between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Hamilton Land Development, Inc. for a For- Sale, Detached Single-Family Project Consisting of 19 Residential Units, With One of the Units Designated as Affordable for Very Low Income Households, to be Developed on a 1.02 Acre Parcel Located Between 19th Street and Hamilton Street at 10295 19th Street. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council execute the attached Density Bonus Agreement.

BACKGROUND:

On July 23, 2025, a for-sale, single-family development consisting of 19 residential units was approved by the Planning Commission for a site at 10295 19 th Street. As part of the project, the developer invoked State Density Bonus Law (SDBL) and, in exchange for setting aside 7% of the units (1 unit) for very low income households, they received a 25% density bonus (4 units), 28 waivers from the City’s development standards, and one incentive/concession for priority processing. Very low income households are defined as households whose income is equal to or less than 50% of the county area median income (AMI), which ranges from $39,200 to $73,850 depending on the number of people in the household. The remaining 18 units of the project will be sold at market rate.

As required under the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code and SDBL, the applicant must execute an affordable housing agreement prior to building permit issuance. The applicant has worked with staff and the City attorney’s office to draft the agreement to bind the development to providing one affordable housing unit for very low income households until termination of the agreement occurs.

ANALYSIS:

In addition to establishing 7% of the units (1 unit) to be sold to very low income households, the agreement also highlights applicable restrictions on the affordable unit, certification and sale processes, equity sharing options, and general provisions to be followed for the restricted unit.

The agreement establishes that the affordable unit must be sold at the specific affordable rate in perpetuity, unless the unit is sold at a rate that exceeds the affordable housing rate or is sold to a

Page 135 ends

Page 2 ends

3 4
8 0
person or household with an income in excess of the income permitted, in which case an equity sharing agreement can be arranged with the City. This scenario would allow the City to recapture its proportionate share of appreciation and the Density Bonus Agreement would be terminated.

The restricted unit will be identical to other market rate units within the development in terms of bedroom count, size, design, materials, finished quality, and appearance.

To ensure affordability compliance, the City will provide the developer with a household income verification form in which the income of the buyer can be substantiated and the maximum housing cost can be delineated. The developer will also need to provide the City with a copy of the applicable purchase agreement and any purchase money loan being utilized by the buyer to ensure the sale is completed at the specified affordable rate.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Execution of the affordable housing agreement will allow for an equity sharing process to occur in which the City can be reimbursed for the initial non-monetary subsidy made for the project and receive a proportionate share of any appreciation generated should the restricted unit be sold above the very low income affordable housing rate in a subsequent purchase after the initial sale.

While there will be minimal administrative costs related to monitoring and enforcement, the agreement will allow for a public investment to be preserved and reinvested locally to promote ongoing homeownership opportunities for lower income households.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

Execution of the affordable housing agreement supports the City Council mission statement to continuously ensure and advance the quality of life for the community through inclusive decision- making by establishing a stable, affordable housing option for the community. Housing affordability can enhance health outcomes, educational attainment, economic mobility, and other social determinants that contribute to a higher quality of life. By incorporating both affordable and market rate units, the development supports a diverse community where residents of varying income levels can access high quality housing, with affordability tailored to meet the needs of qualifying households.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Density Bonus Agreement

Page 136 ends

-1-
Recording Requested By,
and When Recorded Return to:

City of Rancho Cucamonga
Attn: City Clerk
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
APN(s):

SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER’S USE
This Density Bonus Agreement (“For Sale Project”) is recorded for the benefit of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and is exempt from Recording Fees pursuant to Sections 6103, 27383 and 27388.1 of the California Government Code.

DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT
(“FOR SALE” PROJECT)
THIS DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”), is enter ed into as of ____________, 2026, by and between Hamilton Land Development, Inc., a California corporation, (hereinafter “Owner”), and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA , a municipal corporation of the State of California (hereinafter the “City”).

R E C I T A L S
A. Owner is the owner of that certain real property located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as more particularly described on Exhibit “A” (the “Land”).

B. Owner intends to develop (or cause to be developed) a nineteen (19)-unit project on the Land (the “Project”), which shall consist of “for sale” de tached single family homes on individual lots, 18 of which will be sold at market rates on the lots more particularly described on Exhibit “B” (the “Market Rate Lots”) and one of which shall be sold at an Affordable Housing Cost (as defined herein) on the lot more particularly described on Exhibit “C” (the “Affordable Lot”).

C. Owner has been granted a density bonus consisting of four (4) units, one (1) incentive/concession of priority processing, and the following twenty-eight (28) land use waivers and reductions: 1) Minimum lot size reduced from 4 ,000 square feet to 1 ,600 square feet; 2) Minimum lot width reduced from 45 feet to 31 feet; 3) Minimum corner lot width reduced from 50 feet to 35 feet; 4) Minimum lot depth reduced from 80 feet to 51 feet; 5) Minimum front yard setback reduced from 27 feet to 3.8 feet; 6) Min imum interior side yard setback reduced from 5 feet to 3 feet; 7) Minimum rear yard setback reduced from 15 feet to 5 feet; 8) Minimum streetscape setback for a single family home abutting a bicycle corridor street reduced from 35 feet to 19 feet (as measured from face of curb); 9) Minimum landscape and wall setback for a single family home abutting a bicycle corridor street reduced from 18 feet average/15 feet minimum to 14 feet average/13 feet minimum (as measured from face of curb); 10) Minimum patio/por ch depth Attachment 1

Page 137 ends

-2-

reduced from 6 feet to 1 foot; 11) Minimum driveway depth reduced from 19 feet to 3 feet; 12) Minimum driveway width reduced from 18 feet to 16 feet; 13) One of the two required parking spaces be uncovered waived; 14) 50% maximum lot coverage waived; 15) Minimum open space requirement reduced from 35% to 31%; 1 6) 400 square foot usable yard area with a minimum horizontal dimension of 15 feet in any direction waived; 17) Pedestrian walkway connecting every building entrance with a public sidewalk waived; 18) Onsite greenways waived; 19) 50% of all units shall have a different garage configuration waived; 20) Maximum 5% slope of a driveway within 18 feet in front of a garage waived; 21) Maximum 40% frontage for access driveways and parking on lots up to 100 feet in width waived; 22) Location of corner parcel parking locations waived; 23) Minimum distance that parking access shall be from the intersection of the front and street facing side property lines reduced from 50 feet to 19 feet; 24) Minimum setback dist ance from the interior edge of the sidewalk pavement for walls and fences located in corner side yards reduced from 5 feet to 3 feet; 25) Minimum 25% of units in a detached single-family development must be single-story waived; 26) Minimum 5 foot front setback variation between adjacent houses waived; 27) Varied garage treatments waived; 28) minimum two (2) floor plans and three (3) elevations waived.

D. This Agreement may not be subordinate, or subordinated, to any deed of trust or other lien (except as otherwise expressly provided for herein).

E. One (1) of the units at the Project shall be restricted as provided in this Agreement (the “Density Bonus Unit”).

F. The Density Bonus Unit shall be completed prior to or concurrently with the completion of the market rate units. Upon recordation of a final tract map creating the 19 individual residential lots , the City shall release the Market Rate Lots from the terms hereof by recording an amendment to this Density Bonus Agreement in substantially the same fo rm as attached as Exhibit “D”.

NOW, THEREFORE, City and Owner agree as follows:

1. Term. The term of this Agreement (the “Term”) shall commence on the date of recording hereof and shall (unless otherwise terminated earlier) continue in full force and effect perpetually after the date on which the Density Bonus Unit ha s been issued a certificate of occupancy by the City (the “Expiration Date”), except for any provisions which by the terms of this Agreement survive the expiration of this Agreement. Each party shall confirm the Expiration Date in writing upon written request of the other party.

2. Senior Priority; Nature of Covenants, Reservations and Restrictions. Owner hereby represents and warrants that any deed of trust encumbering the Land and Project as of the date of recording of this Agreement will be subordinated to this Agreement . Owner hereby subjects the Land and Density Bonus Unit to the covenants, reservations , and restrictions set forth in this Agreement for the Term. Each and every contract, deed , or other instrument hereafter executed covering or conveying any portion of or intere st in the Land or Density Bonus Unit, including, without limitation, any leases, shall conclusively be held to have been executed, delivered , and accepted subject to this Agreement and the covenants, reservations , and restrictions set forth in this Agreement. City shall not subordinate or agree to subordinate this Agreement to any deed of

Page 138 ends

-3-

trust, lien , or other encumbrance , provided that if (i) Owner obtains financing that would be conducive to the Project’s development or operation (“Project Financing”) and (ii) the lender of the Project Financing (the “Lender”) requests a subordination agreement then, within thirty (30) days’ written request from Owner, the City will execute a recordable subordination agreement on a form reasonably acceptable to the City which subordinates the City’s rights and privileges under this Agreement to the rights and privileges of the Lender under the Project Financing loan documents provided that in no event shall such subordination violate state law, or interfere with the provisions or restrictions concerning the Affordable Lot and its management.

3. Maintenance; Repair; Code Enforcement . Owner shall maintain the Project (including the Density Bonus Unit) in good condition and repair, and shall promptly rebuild the Density Bonus Unit if damaged or destroyed prior to close of escrow of s uch unit, subject to a reasonable period of time to apply for and obtain any available insurance proceeds for damage covered by insurance. Owner acknowledges and agrees that, subject to compliance with applicable laws, City and its employees and authorized agents, shall have the right to conduct code compliance and/or code enforcement inspections of the Project and the individual dwelling units at the Project (including, but not limited to, the Density Bonus Unit), both exterior and interior, at reasonable times and upon reasonable notice (not less than 48 hours prior notice, except in an emergency) to Owner or any subsequent owner, as applicable. The foregoing will not, however, limit the exercise of police powers by City.

4. Occupancy, Sale and Re -Sale of the Density Bonus Unit . Owner covenants and agrees for itself, its successors, assignees, and every successor in inter est that the Density Bonus Unit shall be restricted as follows:
(a) Owner Occupancy. Owner and subsequent owners shall not sell the Density Bonus Unit except to persons and households who intend to occupy the Density Bonus Unit as their Principal Residence (as hereinafter defined). No owner of the Density Bonus Unit shall lease the Density Bonus Unit without the express prior written permission of the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (“Director”).
(b) Restricted to Very Low-Income Households. The Density Bonus Unit shall not be sold except at an Affordable Housing Cost (as hereinafter defined) to Very Low -Income Households (as hereinafter defined) as follows:
(i) The Density Bonus Unit shall be sold to Very Low -Income Household(s) at a price that will result in an Affordable Housing Cost, and each subsequent owner after Owner of the Density Bonus Unit may not sell the Density Bonus Unit except to a Very Low - Income Household at a price that will result in an Affordable Housing Cost, but if any such subsequent owner sells the Density Bonus Unit to a person or household with an income in excess of the income permitted for a Very Low -Income Household or at a price in ex cess of the price that would result in an Affordable Housing Cost, then such subsequent owner shall comply with Subsection 4(d) below (regarding equity sharing).

Page 139 ends

-4-

(c) Qualified Nonprofit Housing Corporation Buyers . If the Density Bonus Unit is not purchased by a qualified buyer from Owner within 180 days after the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the Project, then Owner may sell it to a qualified nonprofit housing corporation that meets all of the foll owing requirements pursuant to a recorded contract that satisfies all of the requirements specified in Revenue and Taxation Code Section 402.1(a)(10), including, without limitation:
(i) The nonprofit corporation has a determination letter from the Internal Revenue Service affirming its tax-exempt status pursuant to Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code and is not a private foundation as that term is defined in Section 509 of the Internal Revenue Code.
(ii) The nonprofit corporation is based in California.
(iii) All of the board members of the nonprofit corporation have their primary residence in California.
(iv) The primary activity of the nonprofit corporation is the development and preservation of affordable home ownership housing in California that incorporates within their contracts for initial purchase a repurchase option that requires a subsequent purchaser of the property that desires to resell or convey the property to offer the qualified nonprofit corporation the right to repurchase the property prior to selling or conveying that property to any other purchaser pursuant to an equity sharing agreement (cons istent with Subsection 4(d) below), or affordability restrictions on the sale and conveyance of the Density Bonus Unit, enforceable by both the nonprofit corporation and City, that ensure that the Density Bonus Unit will be preserved for Very Low-Income Households in perpetuity for a owner-occupied housing unit and will be sold or resold only to persons of Very Low-Income Households, as defined in Health and Safety Code Section 50052.5, and such equity sharing agreement shall be subject to the review and ap proval in writing of the City Manager.

For purposes of this Subsection 4(c), a “qualified nonprofit housing corporation” is a nonprofit housing corporation organized pursuant to Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code that has received a welfare exemption under Revenue and Taxation Code Section 214.15 for properties intended to be sold to Very Low-Income Households who participate in a special no-interest loan program.
(d) Equity Sharing Agreement. After the initial sale of the Density Bonus Unit by Owner at an Affordable Housing Cost to a qualified buyer, or to a qualified nonprofit housing corporation, the following shall apply to any subsequent sale of the Density Bonus Unit at a cost in excess of the price that would result in an Affordable Housing Cost:

Page 140 ends

-5-

(i) Upon resale, the seller of the Density Bonus Unit shall retain the value of any documented improvements made by the seller, the documented down payment, and the seller’s proportionate share of appreciation (determined by application of Subsection 4(d) (iv) below).
(ii) City shall recapture (be paid at closing of the sale) the Initial Subsidy Amount (defined in Subsection 4(d) (iii) below) and City’s proportionate share of appreciation, as described in Subsection 4(d)(iv) below (which amount shall be used within 5 years for any of the purposes described in California Health and Safety Code Section 33334.2(e) that promote home ownership).
(iii) The “Initial Subsidy Amount” shall be equal to the fair market value of the Density Bonus Unit at the time of initial sale (as determined by City in good faith) minus the initial sale price to the qualified buyer (plus the amount of any down payment assistance or mortgage assistance provided by City, if applicable). If upon resale the market value is lower than the initial market value, then the value at the time of the resale (as determined by City in good faith) shall be used as the initial market value.
(iv) City’s proportionate share of appreciation shall be equal to the ratio of City’s Initial Subsidy Amount to the fair market value of the Density Bonus Unit at the time of initial sale (as determined in good faith by City). The remainder shall be the seller ’s proportionate share of appreciation.
(v) If the Density Bonus Unit is purchased by a qualified nonprofit housing corporation pursuant to Subsection 4(c) above, the City may enter into a contract with the qualified nonprofit housing corporation under which the qualified nonprofit housing corporation would recapture any initial subsidy and its proportionate share of appreciation if the qualifi ed nonprofit housing corporation is required to use 100 % of the proceeds to promote homeownership for lower income households within City.
(e) Termination as to the Density Bonus Unit. Upon payment to City of City’s proportionate share of appreciation, if any, in accordance with Subsection 4 (d) above, or the recording in perpetuity affordability restrictions under S ubsection 4(c)(iv) above, the City Manager shall upon written request of the then-owner of the Density Bonus Unit, execute on behalf of City and deliver to the owner an original counterpart of a recordable “Termination of Affordability Agreement (Density Bonus),” duly acknowledged, for such Density Bonus Unit that terminates this Agreement as to such Density Bonus Unit, and which then may be recorded by such owner. In no event shall the City unduly condition, withhold or delay the issuance and recordation of such Termination of Affordability Agreement (Density Bonus).

Page 141 ends

-6-

(f) Definitions.
(i) “Affordable Housing Cost ” means the maximum monthly amount allowed for an owner to pay for a Density Bonus Unit in accordance with California Health and Safety Code Section 50052.5(b) , adjusted for household size and income level, and 25 California Code of Regulations Sections 6920 and 6924, or applicable successor provisions. “Affordable Housing Cost” shall be inclusive of any parking charge. No separate parking cost may be charged in addition to the “Affordable Housing Cost.”
(ii) “Principal Residence” means the principal dwelling place a person or household uses as such person’s or household’s usual place of return and occupancy. The owner of a Density Bonus Unit shall reside in the unit as such person or household’s primary residence for at least 10 out of every 12 consecutive months unless actively serving in the United States military. Notwithstanding this requirement, an owner may live elsewhere for a period of up to 6 months every 5 years on account of hardships, including, without limitation, medical reasons, the need to assist a family member in crisis or medical need, and relocation for employment purposes, provided reasonable evidence of such hardship is submitted to and verified by the Director.
(iii) “Very Low -Income Household ” means a household whose gross annual income does not exceed the dollar amount of the annual very low income for the County of San Bernardino, adjusted for family size, as published and periodically updated by the State Department of Housing and Community Development pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Sections 50105 and 50079.5.

5. City Verification of Household Income and Affordable Housing Cost. The owner of the Density Bonus Unit shall certify to the Director, on a reasonable form provided by City, the income of any buyer and the Affordable Housing Cost (maximum sales price) prior to any sale, and shall provide City with a copy of the applicable purchase agreement and any amendments prior to any sale and information about any p urchase money loan being used by the buyer, as reasonably necessary for City to verify the Affordable Hou sing Cost. City sha ll verify the Affordable Housing Cost within ten (10) business days after the owner of such Density Bonus Unit has submitted the applicable purchase agreement to the City. Upon written request from City, owner shall deliver to City a completed income computation and certification form as may be reasonably required by the City Manager from time to time, together, with such information as may be reasonably required by the Ci ty Manager. City shall have the continuing right to require from owners of Density Bonus Unit who are selling a Density Bonus Unit evidence reasonably necessary to verify that the restrictions, limitations , and requirements of Section 4 are being complied with for the Density Bonus Unit.

Page 142 ends

-7-

6. Construction of Density Bonus Unit . Owner covenants and agrees for itself, its successors, assignees, and every successor in interest that the Density Bonus Unit shall be constructed concurrent with, or before the construction of the market rate units. Construction of the Density Bonus Unit shall be:
(a) Proportional, in number of bedrooms, and location to the market rate units in the Project;
(b) Comparable to the market rate units included in the Project in terms of size, design, materials, finished quality, and appearance; and (c) Permitted the same access to Project amenities and recreational facilities (if any), as are market rate units.

7. Compliance with Law . Owner covenants that the Project shall be operated and maintained in conformance with all applicable laws, including all health, building, and safety codes. Owner further covenants that any construction, renovation, repair , or rehabilitation shall be undertaken in compliance with all applicable laws, including the City’s building codes applicable at the time of such construction, renovation, repair, or rehabilitation. If a single building is constructed on the Land to contain the Density Bonus Unit, that building shall be of the same quality and use similar materials to the buildings that contain the units that are not the Density Bonus Unit.

8. Indemnification. Owner shall defend, indemnify, assume all responsibility for and hold City, and its respective elected and appointed officers and employees, harmless from all costs incurred (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs), claims, demands, liabilities, and judgments for injury or damage to property and injuries to persons, including death, which may be related to the Project or caused by any of Owner’s activities under this Agreement, whether such activities or performance thereof be by Owner or anyone directly employed by Owner and whether such damage shall accrue or be discovered before or after expiration of this Agreement. This indemnity includes, without limitation , any repair, cleanup, remediation, detoxification, or preparation and implementation of any removal, remedial, response, closure , or other plan (regardless of whether undertaken due to governmental action) concerning any hazardous substance or hazardous wastes including petroleum and its fractions as defined in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act “CERCLA”; 42 U.S.C.

Section 9601, et seq., the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act “RCRA”; 42 U.S.C. Section 6901 et seq., and California Health and Safety Code Section Code Section 25280 et seq. The foregoing is intended to operate as an agreement pursuant to Section 107(e) of CERCLA and California Health and Safety Code Section 25364 to assure, protect, hold harmless and indemnify City from liability. Notwithstanding the above, this Section shall not apply to the negligent acts of City or its employees. This section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.

9. Books and Records; City Inspections; Annual Report to City . Each owner selling a Density Bonus Unit shall keep and retain all documents and records relating to the sale by it of a Density Bonus Unit for a period of 3 years and shall make them available to City on 15 business days’ prior notice, provided however that if the provisions of any federal or state law or regulation requires a longer period of retention, each such owner shall comply with such period or retention.

Page 143 ends

-8-

10. Violation of Regulatory Agreement by Owner . Upon the occurrence of a default by an owner of the Density Bonus Unit under this Agreement that is not cured within 30 days after written notice from City, City may apply to any court, State or Federal, for specific performance of this Agreement for an injunction against any violation by the owner of this Agreement or for such other relief as may be appropriate, including, without limitation, damages (including, without limitation, any sums paid to the owner in excess of the maximum sales price for a Density Bonus Unit), and the reasonable cost to City in enforcing the terms of this Agreement (including the reasonable time expended by City staff, consultants, auditors, attorneys , and other personnel involved in such enforcement); provided, however, that if the default does not consist of an intentional misrepresentation by the owner, and cannot be cured within 30 days, the owner shall not be in default so long as the owner promptly commences to cure the default after written notice from City and thereafter diligently and continuously prosecutes the cure to completion, as shown by reasonable evidence delivered to City from time to time upon reque st by City. The remedies of City herein, or under any other instrument providing for or evidencing the financial assistance resulting from the restrictions herein, are cumulative, and the exercise of one or more of such remedies shall not be deemed an ele ction of all remedies and shall not preclude the exercise by City of any one or more of its other remedies. The result of every act or omission whereby any of the covenants contained in this Agreement are violated in whole or in part is hereby declared to be and constitutes a nuisance, and every remedy allowable at law or equity, against a nuisance, either public or private, shall be applicable against every such result and may be exercised by City without derogation of City’s other rights and remedies at law, in equity or under this Agreement.

11. General Provisions.
(a) The covenants which have been established pursuant to this Agreement shall be deemed to be covenants running with the land to provide for affordable housing in the community. The covenants hereof shall be bind ing upon the Density Bonus Unit and run for the benefit of City and its successors and assigns, and such covenants shall run in favor of City for the entire period during which such covenants shall be in force and effect, without regard to whether City is or remains an owner of any land or interest therein to which such covenants relate. City is deemed the beneficiary of the terms and provisions of this Agreement and of the covenants running with the land, for and in its own rights and for the purposes of protecting the interests of the community and other parties, public or private, in whose favor and for whose benefit this Agreement and the covenants running with the land have been provided. (b) This Agreement and the covenants, reservations, restrictions, and agreements contained herein shall be a burden upon the Density Bonus Unit and Project and shall bind each owner of a Density Bonus Unit and its successors in interest, and its successors and assigns with respect to the Density Bonus Unit and the Project. Any successor, purchaser, transferee or assignee of this Agreement will be bound by all of the provisions hereof .

Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this Agreement shall prevent the Owner from selling, transferring, assigning or otherwise disposing of ownership of the Market Rate Lots , to separate unrelated parties upon recordation of the Amendment in substantially the same form as Exhibit “D”.

Page 144 ends

-9-

(c) This Agreement represents the entire agreement of the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and may not be altered or amended except by writing executed between the parties to be charged.
(d) In any action between the parties to interpret, enforce, reform, modify, rescind, or otherwise in connection with any of the terms or provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in the action shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief to whi ch it may be entitled, reasonable costs and expenses including, without limitation, litigation costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees.
(e) If any term, covenant, condition , or provision of this Agreement, or the application thereof to any circumstance, shall, at any time or to any extent, be determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, then the remainder of this Agreement, or the applicatio n thereof to circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected thereby and each term, covenant, condition , and provision of this Agreement, shall be valid and enforceable, to the fullest extent permitted by law. (f) Time is of the essence hereof.
(g) No waiver by City of any breach of or default under this Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach thereof or default hereunder. (h) This Agreement and all related documents shall be deemed to be contracts made and delivered in the State of California and shall be governed and construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of said State. Headings and titles herein are for convenience only and shall not influence any construction or interpretation. (i) Any notice required to be given hereunder shall be given by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, at the addresses specified below, or at such other addresses as may be specified in writing by the parties hereto as follows:

If to City: City of Rancho Cucamonga
Attn: City Clerk
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
If to the initial Owner (developer): Hamilton Land Development, Inc.

Attn: Matt Hamilton
1635 Ohms Way, Suite A
Costa Mesa, CA 92627

If to Any Subsequent Owner: To the applicable Density Bonus Unit

This Agreement may be simultaneously executed in multiple counterparts, all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument, and each of which shall be deemed to be an original.

Page 145 ends

-10-

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have entered into this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.

By:

Print Name:

Title:

By:

Print Name:

Title:

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
a municipal corporation of the State of California
By:

Print Name:

Title:

ATTEST:

By:

Kim Sevy, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney

Page 146 ends

-11-

CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this
certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is
attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

On before me, ________________________________________ Notary Public, personally appeared ________________________________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instr ument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity, and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity(ies) upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Place Notary Seal Above
Signature of Notary Public

Page 147 ends

-12-

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Place Notary Seal Above
Signature of Notary Public

Page 148 ends

A-1-
11231-0001\3210817v1.doc
EXHIBIT “A”

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE LAND
Real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as follows:

Parcel No. 1:

The East 85 feet of that portion of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 35, Township 1 North, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, according to government survey, described as follows:

Beginning at a point 3956.7 feet North and 693 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 35, thence running East 627 feet; thence South 388.8 feet; thence West 627 feet; thence North 388.8 feet to the Point of Beginning.

Excepting therefrom any portion of the above described property lying within any streets or highways.

Parcel No. 2:

The West 50 feet of the East 135 feet of that portion of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 35, Township 1 North, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, in the County of San Bernardino, State of California, according to government survey, described as follows:

Commencing at a point 3956.7 feet North and 693 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of said section; thence running East 627 feet; thence South 388.8 feet; thence West 627 feet; thence North 388.8 feet to the Point of Beginning.

Excepting therefrom any portion of above described property lying within any streets or highways.

APN: 1076-121-17-0-000

Page 149 ends

B-1-
11231-0001\3210817v1.doc
EXHIBIT “B”

DESCRIPTION OF MARKET RATE LOTS

Lots 1 through 7 and 9 through 19 of Tract No. 20761 in The City Of Rancho Cucamonga, County Of San Bernardino, State Of California.

Page 150 ends

C-1-
11231-0001\3210817v1.doc
EXHIBIT “C”

DESCRIPTION OF THE AFFORDABLE LOT
Lot 8 of Tract No. 20761 in The City Of Rancho Cucamonga, County Of San Bernardino, State Of California.

Page 151 ends

D-1-
11231-0001\3210817v1.doc
EXHIBIT “D”

AMENDMENT
Recording Requested By,
and When Recorded Return to:

Attn:

Email:

APN)s:

SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER’S USE
This Amendment to Density Bonus Agreement is recorded for the benefit of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and is exempt from Recording Fees pursuant to Sections 6103, 27383 and 27388.1 of the California Government Code.

AMENDMENT TO DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT
THIS AMENDMENT TO DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”), is entered into as of ____________, ____, by and between _______________ (“Owner” ), and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA , a municipal corporation of the State of California (the “City”).

B. Owner and the City entered into that certain Density Bonus Agreement dated as of _____________, ____, and recorded on _____________ as Document No. ______________ in the Official Records of San Bernardino County, California (the “Regulatory Agreement”).

C. Pursuant to Recital F of the Regulatory Agreement, Owner and City desire to amend the Regulatory Agreement in order to release the Market Rate Property from the Regulatory Agreement as set forth in this Amendment.

NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

Page 152 ends

D-2-

1. Authority; Effective Date. This Amendment is executed and delivered pursuant to and in accordance with Recital F of the Regulatory Agreement. The effective date of this Amendment shall be the date of recordation thereof.

2. Release of Market Rate Property . The Regulatory Agreement is hereby amended to release the Market Rate Property from the encumbrance created by the Regulatory Agreement, and accordingly, the Regulatory Agreement shall encumber the Affordable Lot only. All references to the Land shall hereafter mean and refer solely to the Affordable Lot, all references to the Project shall hereafter mean and refer solely to the Project and all references to the Density Bonus Unit shall hereafter mean and refer solely to the unit at the Project located on the Affordable Lot.

3. Confirmation of Regulatory Agreement . Except as amended hereby, the Regulatory Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects.

4. Capitalized Terms. Unless defined in this Amendment, all capitalized terms used in this Amendment shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Regulatory Agreement.

5. Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

6. Successors and Assigns. This Amendment shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, successors, and assigns.

7. Counterparts. This Amendment may be simultaneously executed in multiple counterparts, all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument, and each of which shall be deemed to be an original.

Page 153 ends

D-3-

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of the date first set forth above.

By:

Name:

Title:

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
a municipal corporation of the State of California
By:

Name:

Title:

ATTEST:

By:

Kim Sevy, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney

Page 154 ends

D-4-

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Place Notary Seal Above
Signature of Notary Public

Page 155 ends

D-5-

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Place Notary Seal Above
Signature of Notary Public

Page 156 ends

DATE: June 3, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Elisa C. Cox, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Peter Castro, Deputy City Manager
Maritza Martinez, Public Works Director
Fily Reyes, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: Consideration of a Contract with F.E.C. Electric, Inc. for the Citywide Sports Lighting LED Upgrade Project - Garcia Park in the Amount of $397,510 with a contingency of $79,500 for a total of $477,010. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Approve the plans and specifications for the Citywide Sports Lighting LED Upgrade Project - Garcia Park.

2. Accept the bid received for construction of the Project in the amount of $397,510 from F.E.C. Electric, Inc.

3. Authorize an expenditure of contingency in an amount of $79,500 for construction.

4. Award and authorize the execution of a contract for the Citywide Sports Lighting LED Upgrade Project - Garcia Park to the lowest responsive bidder, F.E.C. Electric, Inc. of Redlands, California, in the amount of $397,510.

BACKGROUND:

Garcia Park, located at 13150 Garcia Drive in Rancho Cucamonga's Lower Etiwanda Neighborhood Landscape District, has served the community for more than 15 years. In response to resident requests for evening sports opportunities, the City explored adding sports field lighting with dark sky-compliant fixtures to extend the park's usability after dark.

Through the MPP 2025-2026 process, Garcia Park was identified as a candidate site under the Citywide Sports Lighting LED Upgrade Project for installation of new electrical infrastructure, foundations, light poles, and LED lighting at the existing ballfield. The LED fixtures are designed to reduce glare and minimize light pollution, balancing extended field use with consideration for nearby residents. Reflecting this priority, the City Council designated the following as a Goal for Fiscal Year 2025-2026: By the end of October 2025, bring a project to add lights to the Garcia Sports Field to the City Council for consideration.

To inform the community about the project, the City conducted a comprehensive community engagement process that included:
•Residential mailers to 2,750 households within Landscape Maintenance District 9 •Two pop-up events at Garcia Park, each drawing approximately 30–50 participants •A virtual community meeting for information-sharing and live feedback •An online survey (June 24–July 30, 2025) that generated 908 responses and 61 written

Page 157 ends

Page 2 ends

3 5
1 0
comments
Survey results were presented to City Council at the October 15, 2025 meeting. The data reflects majority support for the addition of sports field lighting at Garcia Park, with some dissent noted.

The engagement process confirms strong community interest and validates the project's inclusion in the City's Major Projects Program (MPP).

ANALYSIS:

The Notice Inviting Bids for this project was released to the general contracting community and was published in the Daily Bulletin Newspaper on Tuesday, April 28, 2026 and Tuesday, May 5, 2026.

Five (5) bids for this project were opened at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 12, 2026, with bids ranging from $397,510 to $897,000. The budget for the Project was $1,440,000. The apparent low bidder, F.E.C. Electric, Inc., submitted a bid in the amount of $397,510. A bid summary is included in the table below.

Bidder Total Bid Amount
F.E.C. Electric, Inc. $397,510
Ace Electric Inc. $421,800
Zuma Construction Inc. $787,000
Armstrong Cal Builders Inc. $827,340
OrangeBlue General Contractors $879,000
Public Works staff have reviewed all bids received and found all to be complete and in compliance with the bid requirements, with any irregularities deemed inconsequential. Staff have completed the required background investigation and finds the lowest responsive bidder, F.E.C. Electric, Inc., meets all bid document requirements.

Staff is requesting authorization to execute a contract with F.E.C. Electric, Inc. for their bid amount of $397,510, along with a contingency of $79,500 to cover unforeseen conditions associated with construction for the project for a total of $477,010.

A draft of the project contract is included in Attachment 2.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Adequate funds were allocated for this project. A total of $1,440,000 was approved in Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget from LMD-9 (F139) through the MPP process.

Account No. Funding Source Amount
F139 CC312 SC2101 PID2170 LMD-9 (F139) $1,440,000
Anticipated construction costs are estimated to be as follows:

Expenditure Category Amount
Construction Contract $397,510
Construction Contract Contingency (20%) $79,500
Total Estimated Construction Costs $477,010

Page 158 ends

Page 3 ends

3 5
1 0
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

Upgrading City facilities supports the City Council Value of the relentless pursuit of improvement.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Vicinity Map
Attachment 2 – Sample Contract

Page 159 ends

ATTACHMENT 1
Citywide Sports Lighting LED Upgrade Project - Garcia Park

VICINITY MAP

NOT TO SCALE

Project Site

Page 160 ends

13 C O N T R A C T
A. AGREEMENT
KN
OW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the following agreement is made and entered into, in triplicate, as of the date executed by the City Clerk and the Mayor, by and between , hereinafter referred to as the "CONTRACTOR" and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY." WHEREAS, pursuant to the Notice Inviting Sealed Bids or Proposals, bids were received, publicly opened, and declared on the date specified in said notice; and WHEREAS, City did accept the bid of Contractor; and
WHEREAS, City has authorized the City Clerk and Mayor to enter into a written contract with Contractor for furnishing labor, equipment, and material for the construction of "CITYWIDE SPORTS LIGHTING LED UPGRADE PROJECT - GARCIA PARK."
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, it is agreed:

1. GENERAL SCOPE OF WORK: Contractor shall furnish all necessary labor, tools, materials, appliances, and equipment for and do the work for the "CITYWIDE SPORTS LIGHTING LED UPGRADE PROJECT - GARCIA PARK." Said work to be performed in accordance with specifications and standards on file in the office of the City Engineer and in accordance with bid prices hereinafter mentioned and in accordance with the instruction of the City Engineer.

2. INCORPORATED DOCUMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED COMPLEMENTARY: The aforesaid specifications are incorporated herein by reference thereto and made a part hereof with like force and effect as if all of said documents were set forth in full herein.

Said documents, the Resolution Inviting Bids attached hereto, together with this written agreement, shall constitute the entire contract between the parties. This contract is intended to require a complete and finished piece of work and anything necessary to complete the work properly and in accordance with the law and lawful governmental regulations shall be performed by the Contractor whether set out specifically in the contract or not. Should it be ascertained that any inconsistency exists between the aforesaid documents and this written agreement, the provisions of this written agreement shall control.

3. TERMS OF CONTRACT: The undersigned bidder agrees to execute the contract within fifteen (15) days from the date of notice of award of the contract or upon notice by City after the fifteen (15) days, and to complete his portion of the work within 60 working days from the date specified in the Notice to Proceed. The bidder agrees further to the assessment of liquidated damages in the amount of $4,200 for each calendar day the work remains incomplete beyond the expiration of the completion date. City may deduct the amount thereof from any monies due or that may become due the Contractor under this contract. Progress payments made after the scheduled date of completion shall not constitute a waiver of liquidated damages.

4. INSURANCE: Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract, and for 2 years thereafter, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work ATTACHMENT 2

Page 161 ends

14 hereunder by the Contractor, his agents, representatives, employees, or subcontractors.

MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

a. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Se rvices Office (ISO) Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an “occurrence” basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and pers onal & advertising injury with limits no less than $5,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply sepa rately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
b. Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Form CA 0001 covering Code 1 (any auto), with limits no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
c. Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by t he State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employers’ Liability insuranc e with a limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
d. Builder’s Risk (Course of Construction) insuranc e utilizing an “All Risk” (Special Perils) coverage form, with limits equal to the com pleted value of the project and no coinsurance penalty provisions.
e. Surety Bonds. Contractor shall provide the follo wing Surety Bonds:
i. Bid bond
ii. Performance bond
iii. Payment bond
iv. Maintenance bond
f. The Payment Bond and the Performance Bond shall be in a sum equal to the contract price. If the Performance Bond provides fo r a one-year warranty a separate Maintenance Bond is not necessary. If the warranty period specified in the contract is for longer than one year a Maintena nce Bond equal to 10% of the contract price is required. Bonds shall be duly executed by a responsible corporate surety, authorized to issue such bonds in the State of California and secured through an authorized agent with an office in California. g. Professional Liability (if Design/Build), with l imits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence or claim, and $2,000,000 policy aggregate. The retroactive date must be shown, and this date must be before the executio n date of the contract or the beginning of contract work. Insurance must be maint ained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) ye ars after completion of contract work. If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and n ot replaced with another claims-made policy form with a retroactive date pri or to the contract effective, or start of work date, the Contractor must purchase ex tended reporting period coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of contract work. A copy of the claims reporting requirements must be submitted to the Entity for review.

Page 162 ends

15 h. Contractors’ Pollution Legal Liability and/or As bestos Legal Liability and/or Errors and Omissions (if project involves environmental hazards) with limits no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence or claim, and $2,000,000 policy aggregate. If the services involve lead-based paint or asbestos ident ification/remediation, the Contractors Pollution Liability policy shall not contain lead-based paint or asbestos exclusions. If the services involve mold identification/remediation, the Contractors Pollution Liability policy shall not contain a mold exclusion, and the definition of Pollution shall include microbial matter, including mold.

If the contractor maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above for all policies, the Entity requires a nd shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or higher limits maintained by the con tractor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the Entity.

Self-Insured Retentions
Self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the Entity. At the option of the Entity, either: the contractor shall cause the insurer shall to reduce or eliminate such self-insured retentions as respects the Entity, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers; or the Contractor shall provide a financial guarantee satisfactory to the Entity guaranteeing payment of losses and related investig ations, claim administration, and defense expenses. The policy language shall provide , or be endorsed to provide, that the self-insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or Entity.

Other Insurance Provisions:

Additional Insured
The Entity, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Contrac tor including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations and automobiles owned, leased, hired, or borrowed by or on behalf of the Contractor.

General liability coverage can be provided in the f orm of an endorsement to the Contractor’s insurance at least as broad as one of the following ISO ongoing operations Forms: CG 20 10 or CG 20 26 or CG 20 33 (not allowed from subcontractors), or CG 20 38; and one of the following ISO completed operations Forms: CG 20 37, 2039 (not allowed from subcontractors), or CG 20 40.

Primary Insurance
For any claims related to this project, the Contractor’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance coverage at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the Entity, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self- insurance maintained by the Entity, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

Notice of Cancellation
Contractor shall provide immediate written notice i f (1) any of the required insurance policies is terminated; (2) the limits of any of the required polices are reduced; (3) or the deductible or self-insured rete ntion is increased. In the event of any cancellation or reduction in coverage or limits of any insurance, Contractor shall forthwith obtain and submit proof of substitute insurance.

Page 163 ends

16 Builder’s Risk (Course of Construction) Insurance
Contractor may submit evidence of Builder’s Risk insurance in the form of Course of Construction coverage. Such coverage shall name the Entity as a loss payee as their interest may appear.

If the project does not involve new or major recons truction, at the option of the Entity, an Installation Floater may be acceptable. For such projects, a Property Installation Floater shall be obtained that provide s for the improvement, remodel, modification, alteration, conversion or adjustment to existing buildings, structures, processes, machinery and equipment. The Property In stallation Floater shall provide property damage coverage for any building, structure, machinery or equipment damaged, impaired, broken, or destroyed d uring the performance of the Work, including during transit, installation, and testing at the Entity’s site.

Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state with a current A.M. Best rating of no less than A: VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the Entity.

Waiver of Subrogation
Contractor hereby agrees to waive rights of subroga tion which any insurer of Contractor may acquire from Contractor by virtue of the payment of any loss.

Contractor agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies r egardless of whether or not the Entity has received a waiver of subrogation endorse ment from the insurer. However, the Workers’ Compensation policy shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of the Entity for all work performed by the Contractor, its employees, agents and subcontractors.

Verification of Coverage
Contractor shall furnish the Entity with original C ertificates of Insurance including all required amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause) and a c opy of the Declarations and Endorsement Page of the CGL policy listing all poli cy endorsements to Entity before work begins. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Contractor’s obl igation to provide them. The Entity reserves the right to require complete, cert ified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements, require d by these specifications, at any time.

Subcontractors
Contractor shall require and verify that all subcon tractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Contractor shall ensure that Entity is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors. For CGL coverage subcontractors shall provide coverage with a form at least as broad as CG 20 38 04 13.

Page 164 ends

17 Special Risks or Circumstances
Entity reserves the right to modify these requireme nts, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other circumstances.

5. PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per die m wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office o f the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamon ga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. City also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site.

Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to City, not more than two hundred dollars ($200.00 ) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by h im or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code.

6. APPRENTICESHIP EMPLOYMENT: In accordance with t he provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California A pprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work.

Attention is directed to the provisions in Section 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him.

Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and wh ich administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except:

a. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 day s prior to the request for certificate, or
b. When the number of apprentices in training in th e area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or

Page 165 ends

18 c. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or d. When the Contractor provides evidence that he em ploys registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less t han one apprentice to eight journeymen.

The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he emp loys registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contr acts and if other contractors on the public works site are making such contributions.

The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall co mply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices.

7. LEGAL HOURS OF WORK: Eight (8) hours of labor s hall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this c ontract, and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be go verned by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3, of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended.

The Contractor or Subcontractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each wo rker employed in the execution of the contract by the respective contractor or subcon tractor for each calendar day during which the worker is required or permitted to work more than 8 hours in any one calendar day and 40 hours in any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of this article.

8. TRAVEL AND SUBSISTENCE PAY: Contractor agrees t o pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.1.

9. CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY: The City of Rancho Cuca monga and its elected officials, officers, agents and employees shall not be answera ble or accountable in any manner for any loss or damage that may happen to the work or any part thereof, or for any of the materials or other things used or employed in performing the work; or for injury or damage to any person or persons, either workmen, employees of the Contractor or his subcontractors or the public, or for damage to adjoining or other property from any cause whatsoever arising out of or in connection with the performance of the work. The Contractor shall be responsible for any damage or i njury to any person or property resulting from defects or obstructions or from any cause whatsoever, except the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its e mployees, servants, or independent contractors who are directly responsible to City during the progress of the work or at any time before its completion and final acceptance.

The Contractor will indemnify City against and will hold and save City harmless from any

Page 166 ends

19 and all actions, claims, damages to persons or prop erty, penalties, obligations, or liabilities that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm, entity, corporation, political subdivision, or other organization arising out of or in connection with the work, operation, or activities of the Contractor, his agents, employees, subcontractors, or invitees provided for herein, whether or not there is concurrent passive or active negligence on the part of City, but excluding such actions, claims, damages t o persons or property, penalties, obligations, or liabilities arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of City, its employees, servants, or independent contractors who are directly responsible to City, and in connection therewith:

a. The Contractor will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any of said claims, damages, penalties, obligations, or liabili ties and will pay all costs and expenses, including attorneys' fees incurred in connection therewith.

b. The Contractor will promptly pay any judgment or award rendered against the Contractor or City covering such claims, damages, penalties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with such work, operations, or activities of the Contractor hereunder or reasonable settlement in lieu of judgm ent or award, and the Contractor agrees to save and hold the City harmless therefrom.

c. In the event City is made a party to any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against the Contractor for damages or other claims arising out of or in connection with the project, operation, or activities of the Contractor hereunder, the Contractor agrees to pay to City any and all costs and expenses incurred by City in such action or proceeding together with reasonable attorneys' fees.

So much of the money due to the Contractor under an d by virtue of the contract as shall be considered necessary by City may be retain ed by City until disposition has been made of such actions or claims for damage as aforesaid.

10. NON-DISCRIMINATION: No discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons upon public works because of age, disability, race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation or national origin of such persons, and every contr actor for public works violating this section is subject to all the penalties imposed for a violation of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 of the Labor Code in accordance with the provisions of Section 1735 of said Code.

11. CONTRACT PRICE AND PAYMENT: City shall pay to the Contractor for furnishing the material and doing the prescribed work per the unit prices set forth in accordance with Contractor's Proposal.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these present to be duly executed with all the formalities required by law on the respective dates set forth opposite their signatures.

State of California Contractor's License #:

Page 167 ends

20 Date

By:

Signature Print Name &Title

By:

Signature Print Name &Title

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA

By: BY:

L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Kim Sevy , City Clerk

Date

Contractor's Business Phone Number: . Emergency Na me and Phone Number at which Contractor can be reached at any time: ___________________________

Page 168 ends

21 C O N T R A C T

B. FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: THAT . as Princip al, and , as Surety, are held
and firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereinafter called City, in the just and full amount of (Written)
$ (Figures) payment whereof we h ereby bind ourselves, our heirs, executors administrators, suc cessors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. Given under our hands and sealed with our seal this day of , 20 .

The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that,

WHEREAS, the above-named principal is about to ente r into a contract with the City, whereby said principal agrees to construct "CITYWIDE SPORTS LIGHTING LED UPGRADE PROJECT - GARCIA PARK" in accordance with the AGREEMENT dat ed , which said contract is hereby referred to and made a part here of to the same extent as if the same were herein specifically set forth;

NOW, THEREFORE, if the said principal shall well and truly do and perform all things agreed by the principal in said contract to be done and perfo rmed, then this obligation is to be void; otherwise it will remain in full force and effect;

PROVIDED, that for value received the undersigned s tipulate and agree that no amendment, change, extension of time, alteration or addition to said contract, or agreement, or of any feature or item or items of performance required therein or thereunder shall in any manner affect the obligations of the undersigned under this bond; and the surety does hereby waive notice of such amendment, limitation of time for bringing action on this bond by the City, change, extension of time, alteration or addition to said contract or ag reement and of any feature or time of performance required therein or thereunder.

WITNESS our hands this day of , 20 .

By: Title:

Surety: By:

Individual Partnership Corpo ration

Other, explain

SIGNATURES OF CONTRACTOR MUST BE ACKNOWLEDGED BEFOR E A NOTARY PUBLIC.

PLEASE ATTACH APPROPRIATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT FORMS
(INDIVIDUAL, PARTNERSHIP, CORPORATION, ETC.).

Page 169 ends

Page 170 ends

23 Bond No.:

C. PAYMENT BOND

(Labor and Materials)

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS that:

WHEREAS the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (name of City) (“City”) has awarded to

(Name and address of Contractor)
(“Principal”), a contract (the “Contract”) for the work described as follows:

“CITYWIDE SPORTS LIGHTING LED UPGRADE PROJECT - GARCIA PARK”

WHEREAS, Principal is required under the terms of t he Contract and the California Civil Code to secure the payment of claims of laborers, mechan ics, materialmen, and other persons as provided by law.

NOW THEREFORE, we, the undersigned Principal, and

(Name and address of Surety)

(“Surety”) a duly admitted surety insurer under the laws of the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto City in the penal sum of
($ ), this amount being not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the tot al contract price, in lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, su ccessors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.

THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH THAT, if the hereby bounded Principal, his, her or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, or subcontractors shall fail to pay any of the persons named in Section 9100 of the California Civil Code, or any amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Code with respect to work or labor performed under the Contract, or for any amounts required to be deducted, withheld, and paid over to the Employment Development Department from the wages of employees of the Principal and subcontractors pursuant to Section 13020 of the Unemployment Insurance Code, with respect to work or labor performed under the Contract, the Surety will pay for the same in an amount not exceeding the penal sum specified in this bond; otherwise, this obligation shall become null and void.

Page 171 ends

DATE: June 3, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Elisa C. Cox, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Peter Castro, Deputy City Manager
Maritza Martinez, Public Works Services Director
Daniel Akers, Public Works Services Deputy Director
Hank Merenda, Parks and Landscape Superintendent
Marissa Ostos, Management Analyst III
SUBJECT: Consideration of Amendment No. 2 to Contract No. 2024-127 with BrightView Landscapes Inc. for LMD-7 and LMD-8 Parkway, Paseo, and Median Island Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Services in an Amount Not to Exceed $420,920 for FY 2026-27. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council approve Amendment No. 2 to contract CO 2024-127 with Brightview Landscapes, Inc., extending the term of the contract to June 30, 2027 in an amount not to exceed $420,920 for FY 2026-27.

BACKGROUND:

The Public Works Services Department and the Procurement Division routinely issue requests for proposals to ensure vendor services remain competitive. On June 19, 2024, City Council awarded a competitively bid contract CO 2024-127 for LMD-7 and LMD-8 Parkway, Paseo, and Median Island Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Services with BrightView Landscapes Inc. effective July 1, 2024 for a one (1) year term with an option to renew in one (1) year increments up to a total of six (6) additional years through June 30, 2031. Currently, all sites are maintained at Service Level A. If approved, Amendment No. 2 to contract CO 2024-127 will extend the term of the contract to June 30, 2027, with a 3.0% rate increase for routine (cyclically scheduled) maintenance and as needed “extra work” line items. A copy of this agreement is available in the City Clerk’s Office.

ANALYSIS:

BrightView Landscapes Inc., continues to meet the services needs of the City and staff recommends the City Council approve the renewal of contract CO 2024-127 effective July 1, 2026 and approve the spending limit of $420,920 for FY 2026-27.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Appropriation will be requested in the recommended FY 2026-27 budget for LMD-7 and LMD-8 Parkway, Paseo, and Median Island Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Services in the following accounts:

Page 172 ends

Page 2 ends

3 4
5 7
Account Number Funding
Source Description Amount
F137 CC319 SC2109 LMD-7 Landscape Maintenance
District 7 $405,970
F138 CC319 SC2109 LMD-8 Landscape Maintenance
District 8 $14,950
Total $420,920

The contract spending limit of $420,920 is based on routine maintenance during the period of July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

This item addresses the City Council’s core values of promoting a safe and healthy community for all, while providing high-quality outdoor spaces.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Amendment No. 2

Page 173 ends

Initials

Page 1 of 2 ends

AMENDMENT NO. 2
to
Agreement (CO 2024-127)
between
BrightView Landscape Services, Inc. (hereinafter Contractor) and
City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter “City”)
T
his Amendment No. 2 will serve to amend the Professional Services Agreement (hereinafter “Agreement”), CO# 2024-127 to incorporate the following:

RECITALS
A. City and Contractor entered into the Agreement on June 19, 2024 pursuant to which Contractor is in the business of performing Parkway, Paseo, and Median Island Landscape and Irrigation Maintenan ce S
ervices for LMD 7 and LMD 8, and
B. Customer and Contractor desire to set forth in this Amendment Number two (2) certain modifications to the Agreement, and
C. In all other respects, the Agreement, as amended shall control the relationship between the Parties.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the Recitals and for other goods and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

Item 1: The term of the agreement is hereby extended an additional year to June 30, 2027, in an amount that shall not exceed $420,913.62 for routine maintenance and extra work during the period July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2027. Routine maintenance shall be performed at service level A per contract specifications.

I
tem 2: Increase unit costs for routine maintenance and hourly rates for extra work by 3. 0%. The contract rates effective July 1, 2026.

A
ll other Terms and Conditions of the original Agreement CO 2024-127 will remain in full effect.

I
N WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized representatives, have executed this Amendment by way of e-signature by both parties and on the date indicated below. Please electronically sign through Docusign no later than June 10, 2026. The Contractor will be provided one (1) fully executed copy of the Amendment once all e-signatures are obtained.

B
rightView Landscape Services, Inc.

By
:

Name Date
City of Rancho Cucamonga
By
:

N ame Date
Title Title
City of Rancho Cucamonga

CONTRACT NUMBER
2024-127
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 174 ends

Initials

Page 2 of 2 ends

By:

Name Date
By:

Name Date

Title
(two signatures required if corporation)

Page 175 ends

DATE: June 3, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Elisa C. Cox, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Peter Castro, Deputy City Manager
Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Christopher Sorensen, Senior Engineer
Sarine Hazarshahian, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Allocating Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) Program Funds for Fiscal Year 2026-27. (RESOLUTION NO. 2026-036) (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution to allocate Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) Program funds for Fiscal Year 2026-27 for the completion of the projects programmed for funding using RMRA funds in the draft Fiscal Year 2026-27 Major Projects Program.

BACKGROUND:

On April 28, 2017, the Governor signed Senate Bill 1 (SB1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 creating the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) in order to address deferred maintenance on the State highway, local street, and road systems. Funds made available by the program are required to be utilized for basic road maintenance and rehabilitation projects, and on critical safety projects. Prior to receiving an apportionment of funds under the program in a fiscal year, the City must submit a list of proposed projects to the California Transportation Commission (CTC), and the funding must be allocated by resolution.

ANALYSIS:

The guidelines and regulations for obtaining funds from the program require local agencies to annually adopt their project list by resolution on or before July 1 for the upcoming fiscal year.

Based on projects included in the draft Major Projects Program and a review of our Pavement Management Program recommendations, staff has identified the following projects which are planned to use SB1 funding for construction in Fiscal Year 2026-27:

Page 176 ends

Page 2 ends

3 4
7 1

1. Etiwanda Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation – Highland Avenue to Church Street

2. 4th Street Pavement Rehabilitation – Etiwanda Avenue to Santa Anita Avenue

3. Highland Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation – Woodruff Place to Rochester Avenue

4. Sapphire Street Pavement Rehabilitation – Almond Street to Banyan Street

5. City Wide Local Slurry Seal Pavement Rehabilitation – Various Locations FISCAL IMPACT:

Revenue for the RMRA is currently estimated to be $4,938,080 in the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Budget.

Staff will continue to monitor revenue estimates and receipts to ensure adequate funding will be available to cover budgeted project costs and will adjust the planned improvements listed above accordingly.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

These projects meet our City Council core values by promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all, planning for a sustainable future, and by strengthening infrastructure to support our commitment to prosperity.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 - Resolution No. 2026-036

Page 177 ends

Resolution No. 2025-XXX - Page 1 of 3
6 8
1 5
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO

CUCAMONGA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE PROJECTS

FOR THE ROAD MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION PROGRAM
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF ROAD

MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION ACCOUNT (RMRA) FUNDS
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (SB1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statues of 2017) was passed by the Legislature and Signed into law by the Governor in April 2017 to address the significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide; WHEREAS, SB1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure the residents of our City are aware of the projects proposed for funding in our community and which projects have been completed each fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, the City must adopt by resolution a list of projects proposed to receive fiscal year funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB1, which must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project's completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement; and WHEREAS, the City, will receive an estimated $4,938,080 in RMRA funding in Fiscal Year 2026-27 from SB1; and
WHEREAS, this is the tenth year in which the City is receiving SB1 funding and will enable the City to continue essential road maintenance and rehabilitation projects, safety improvements, repairing and replacing aging bridges, and increasing access and mobility options for the traveling public that would not have otherwise been possible without SB1; and
WHEREAS, the City used a Pavement Management System to develop the SB1 project list to ensure revenues are being used on the most high-priority and cost-effective projects that also meet the community's priorities for transportation investment; and WHEREAS, the funding from SB1 will help the City maintain and rehabilitate four (4) major arterial roadways and one (1) local street project in the City this year and similar projects into the future; and WHEREAS, the 2023 California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment found that the City's streets and roads are in a condition of lower risk meaning the average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) is between 61 and 70 on a scale of 1 to 100, and this revenue will help us maintain the selected streets benefitting the overall quality of our road system, and over the next decade will continue to be used to maintain our streets and roads; and
WHEREAS, the SB1 project list and overall investment in our local streets and roads infrastructure with a focus on basic maintenance and safety, investing in complete streets infrastructure, and using cutting-edge technology, materials and practices, will have significant positive co-benefits statewide.

Page 178 ends

Resolution No. 2025-XXX - Page 2 of 9
NOW, THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, ORDERED AND FOUND by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, as follows:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.

2. The following list of proposed projects will be funded in-part or solely with Fiscal Year 2026-27 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues:

Project 1:

Etiwanda Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation – Highland Avenue to Church Street:

This project includes cold planing, localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt rubber hot mix overlay, ADA ramp upgrades, installation of a video detection system, utility adjustments, and thermoplastic pavement striping for approximately 1.55 mile of roadway. The estimated useful life of this roadway is 20 years and construction is anticipated to start in December 2026.

Project 2:
4th Street Pavement Rehabilitation – Etiwanda Avenue to Santa Anita Avenue:

This project includes cold planing, localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt rubber hot mix overlay, ADA ramp upgrades, utility adjustments, and thermoplastic pavement striping for approximately 0.88 miles of roadway. The estimated useful life of this roadway is 20 years and construction is anticipated to start in August 2026.

Project 3:

Highland Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation – Woodruff Place to Rochester Avenue This project includes cold planing, localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt rubber hot mix overlay, ADA ramp upgrades, installation of a video detection system, utility adjustments, and thermoplastic pavement striping for approximately 0.55 miles of roadway. The estimated useful life of this roadway is 20 years and construction is anticipated to start in December 2026.

Project 4:

Sapphire Street Pavement Rehabilitation – Almond Street to Banyan Street:

This project includes cold planing, localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt rubber hot mix overlay, ADA ramp upgrades, utility adjustments, and thermoplastic pavement striping for approximately 1.27miles of roadway. The estimated useful life of this roadway is 20 years and construction is anticipated to start in December 2026.

Project 5:

Local Slurry Seal Pavement Rehabilitation
Project Locations: City Wide

Page 179 ends

Resolution No. 2025-XXX - Page 3 of 9
No. On Street From Street To Street
1 ALMOND ST TURQUOISE AVE CRESTVIEW PL
2 ALTA LOMA DR PYRITE PL JEDEITE AVE
3 ALTA LOMA DR BERYL ST OLD RANCH RD
4 ALTARI PL ELLENA WEST AMELIA DR
5 AMARILLO ST BEAL CT CORTLAND ST
6 AMELIA DR VENOSA PL COSENZA PL
7 APPALOOSA GALLOWAY ST DELLA AVE
8 APPIAN WINTERBERRY PL CEDAR HILL PL
9 AQUAMARINE AVE END WHIRLAWAY ST
10 AQUAMARINE AVE END BANYAN ST
11 ASTER CT END TIPU PL
12 AVENIDA CASTRO CHELSEA CT CALLE VEJAR
13 AVENIDA LEON CHELSEA CT CALLE VEJAR
14 BARBERRY ST VICTORIA PARK LN TIPU PL
15 BARSAC PL CONCANNON ST LEMON AVE
16 BARSAC PL END CONCANNON ST
17 BEAL CT AMARILLO ST END
18 BEGONIA CT END TIPU PL
19 BELLUNO PL TOLENTINO DR VICTORIA PARK LN
20 BENEVENTO PL END TRAPANI DR
21 BERRA RD ELLENA EAST COMISO WAY
22 BIOLA PL AMARILLO ST FAIRMONT WAY
23 BIRCHWOOD CT END ORANGE ST
24 BLUE SPRUCE DR WINTERBERRY PL CEDAR HILL PL
25 BOWEN ST HYACINTH ST BAKER AVE
26 BOWEN ST END HYACINTH ST
27 BRANDY PL END SEMILLON PL
28 BUTLER PEAK PL BANYAN ST TERRACE VIEW LOOP
29 CABERNET PL BANYAN ST CHAMPAGNE RD
30 CABRINI CT END DELAWARE ST
31 CALAVERAS AVE 9TH ST nan
32 CALLAWAY PL BANYAN ST CONCANNON ST
33 CALLE BRESCA VIA HUERTE VIA MARACA
34 CALLE CLARIN VIA HUERTE RED HILL COUNTRY

CLUB DR
35 CALLE DEL PRADO BUENA VISTA DR END
36 CANYON MEADOWS
DR

WINTERBERRY PL CEDAR HILL PL
37 CARINA PL MILANO DR RAPALLO DR
38 CAROL AVE END WHIRLAWAY ST
39 CAROL AVE END BANYAN ST

Page 180 ends

Resolution No. 2025-XXX - Page 4 of 9
40 CEDAR HILL PL BLUE SPRUCE DR CANYON MEADOWS DR
41 CERRITO ROJO DR CALLE DEL PRADO END
42 CHAFFEE ST EDWIN ST JASPER ST
43 CHAMPAGNE RD DAKOTA AVE SEMILLON PL
44 CHAPMAN PL DELAWARE ST AMARILLO ST
45 CHELSEA CT EASTWOOD AVE END
46 CHELSEA CT END AVENIDA CASTRO
47 COMET ST END CHAFFEE ST
48 CONCANNON ST CALLAWAY PL BARSAC PL
49 COPPER PASS CT END TERRACE VIEW LOOP
50 COPPER PASS CT TERRACE VIEW LOOP END
51 CORTE PL END PAVOLA DR
52 CORTLAND ST LAMAR CT AMARILLO ST
53 CORTLAND ST AMARILLO ST END
54 COSENZA PL END AMELIA DR
55 CRESTVIEW PL END ALMOND ST
56 DAKOTA AVE CHAMPAGNE RD KINGSTON ST
57 DAPHNE DR END ROSEWOOD PL
58 DAPHNE DR ROSEWOOD PL END
59 DELAWARE ST CHAPMAN PL CORTLAND ST
60 DELLA AVE WHIRLAWAY ST END
61 DELLA AVE END BANYAN ST
62 DEODAR ST AMETHYST AVE DIAMOND AVE
63 DEVON ST AVENIDA CASTRO HELLMAN AVE
64 DEVON ST AVENIDA CASTRO AVENIDA CASTRO
65 DEVON ST EASTWOOD AVE DEVON ST
66 DEVON ST END EASTWOOD AVE
67 DIAMOND AVE DEODAR ST KLUSMAN AVE
68 DRAKE ST DELAWARE ST SHELTON CT
69 DREW CT AMARILLO ST END
70 EASTWOOD AVE DEVON ST END
71 EDWIN ST 9TH ST MAIN ST
72 EL CAPITAN CT END TERRACE VIEW LOOP
73 ELLENA EAST FERMO PL BASE LINE RD
74 ELLENA WEST ELLENA EAST BASE LINE RD
75 EMERSON ST FAIRMONT WAY END
76 FAIRMONT WAY VICTORIA PARK LN CAMPBELL PL
77 FALLING TREE LN END OLD RANCH RD
78 FAVARA PL FORLI DR RAPALLO DR
79 FERMO PL ELLENA EAST PAVOLA DR
80 FISK CT END DELAWARE ST
81 FORDHAM CT END SHERBROOKE PL

Page 181 ends

Resolution No. 2025-XXX - Page 5 of 9
82 FORENZA PL ELLENA WEST AMELIA DR
83 FORLI DR FAVARA PL TOLENTINO PL
84 FUCHSIA DR ROSEWOOD PL END
85 FUCHSIA DR END ROSEWOOD PL
86 FURMAN CT END CHAPMAN PL
87 GALLOWAY ST END TURQUOISE AVE
88 GAMAY CT END CONCANNON ST
89 GANDINO DR PIZZOLI PL TOLENTINO PL
90 GANNON ST AMARILLO ST WALKER CT
91 GRANITE CT DEODAR ST END
92 HILLSIDE COVE WILSON AVE MANZANITA DR
93 HILLTOP CT END SIERRA CREST VIEW
LOOP
94 HUDSON CT END DRAKE ST
95 HYACINTH ST BOWEN ST CHAFFEE ST
96 INDIGO AVE BANYAN ST INDIGO CT
97 INDIGO AVE END BANYAN ST
98 INDIGO CT INDIGO AVE END
99 INSPIRATION DR CRESTVIEW PL SKYLINE RD
100 JADEITE AVE ORANGE ST HIGHLAND AVE
101 JASPER ST CHAFFEE ST MAIN ST
102 KEARNEY CT END SHERBROOKE PL
103 KENYON WAY TORTONA DR ELLENA EAST
104 KINGSTON ST DAKOTA AVE VALINDA AVE
105 KLUSMAN RD END ALTA LOMA DR
106 KONOCTI ST END AVENIDA CASTRO
107 LAMAR CT END CORTLAND ST
108 LAYTON ST END MANZANITA DR
109 LEMON AVE AMETHYST AVE ARCHIBALD AVE
110 LEMON AVE ORANGEWOOD DR BERYL ST
111 LESINA PL END AMELIA DR
112 LION ST PLACER ST KONOCTI ST
113 MAIN ST END BAKER AVE
114 MALACHITE AVE LEMON AVE HIGHLAND AVE
115 MAMMOTH PEAK CT TERRACE VIEW LOOP END
116 MANZANITA DR HELLMAN AVE AMETHYST AVE
117 MARINO PL END GANDINO DR
118 MCLENNAN END END
119 MERLOT CT END BANYAN ST
120 MILANO DR CARINA PL POTENZA PL
121 MINERAL PEAK CT END TERRACE VIEW LOOP
122 MONTARA AVE END DEVON ST
123 MONTARA AVE PLACER ST KONOCTI ST

Page 182 ends

Resolution No. 2025-XXX - Page 6 of 9
124 MT ABBOTT CT END TERRACE VIEW LOOP
125 MT BAKER CT END SIERRA CREST VIEW
LOOP
126 MT BAKER CT SIERRA CREST VIEW
LOOP
END
127 MT BALDY PL BANYAN ST SIERRA CREST VIEW
LOOP
128 MT CAMBRIDGE CT SIERRA CREST VIEW
LOOP
END
129 MT CAMBRIDGE CT END SIERRA CREST VIEW
LOOP
130 MT COOK CT MT SAN ANTONIO ST END
131 MT GUNNISON CT END END
132 MT HARVARD CT SIERRA CREST VIEW
LOOP
END
133 MT JOHNSON CT END END
134 MT PINOS CT MT SHERMAN CT END
135 MT SAN ANTONIO CT MT COOK CT END
136 MT SHERMAN CT SIERRA CREST VIEW
LOOP
END
137 MT WALLACE CT END END
138 MT WAVERLY CT SIERRA CREST VIEW
LOOP
END
139 MT WHITNEY CT END SIERRA CREST VIEW
LOOP
140 MT WILSON CT END END
141 MUSCAT PL BANYAN ST CHAMPAGNE RD
142 NORTH VICTORIA

WINDROWS

PLUM WAY VICTORIA PARK LN
143 NOVA CT AMARILLO ST END
144 OLD RANCH RD ALTA LOMA DR ORANGEWOOD DR
145 ORANGE ST KLUSMAN AVE JADEITE AVE
146 ORANGE ST AMETHYST AVE MALACHITE AVE
147 ORANGE ST BERYL ST BIRCHWOOD CIR
148 ORANGEWOOD DR LEMON AVE ORANGE ST
149 ORANGEWOOD DR ORANGE ST OLD RANCH RD
150 ORVIETO CT END CHAMPAGNE RD
151 PALMI DR PIZZOLI PL ROCHESTER AVE
152 PAVOLA DR CORTE PL SANZA PL
153 PEARL ST GALLOWAY ST HILLSIDE RD
154 PERIDOT AVE END WHIRLAWAY ST
155 PERIDOT AVE END BANYAN ST
156 PERIDOT AVE BANYAN ST INDIGO AVE
157 PIEDMONT ST FAIRMONT WAY END
158 PINZANO PL MILANO DR RAPALLO DR
159 PIZZOLI PL END GANDINO DR

Page 183 ends

Resolution No. 2025-XXX - Page 7 of 9
160 PLACER ST END AVENIDA LEON
161 PLACER ST LION ST MONTARA AVE
162 POTENZA PL MILANO DR RAPALLO DR
163 POZALLO PL END GANDINO DR
164 PYRAMID PEAK CT END END
165 PYRITE PL ORANGE ST ALTA LOMA DR
166 QUARTZ AVE END LEMON AVE
167 RAINBOW FALLS CT END TERRACE VIEW LOOP
168 RAPALLO DR CARINA PL FAVARA PL
169 ROCKING HORSE PL BANYAN ST BLUE SPRUCE DR
170 ROLLINS CT END SHERBROOKE PL
171 ROSEWOOD PL BARBERRY ST FUCHSIA DR
172 SANZA PL END PAVOLA DR
173 SEMILLON PL CHAMPAGNE RD LEMON AVE
174 SHELTON CT END DRAKE ST
175 SHERBROOKE PL END FORDHAM CT
176 SHERRY CT END CHAMPAGNE RD
177 SIERRA CREST VIEW
LOOP

VINTAGE DR VINTAGE DR
178 SIERRA MADRE AVE 9TH ST END
179 SINCLAIR ST END FAIRMONT WAY
180 SKYLINE RD END ALMOND ST
181 SPINEL AVE VACILLA CT ORANGE ST
182 SURREY LN PEARL ST END
183 SURREY LN END PEARL ST
184 TERRACE VIEW LP VINTAGE DR VINTAGE DR
185 TIPU PL NORTH VICTORIA

WINDROWS LOOP

BARBERRY ST
186 TOLENTINO DR PIZZOLI PL GANDINO DR
187 TORTONA DR KENYON WAY CARINA PL
188 TRAPANI DR BENEVENTO PL BELLUNO PL
189 TRENTON CT PIEDMONT ST END
190 VACILLA CT SPINEL AVE END
191 VALATTA PL END TRAPANI DR
192 VALINDA AVE CHAMPAGNE RD LEMON AVE
193 VENOSA PL END AMELIA DR
194 VIA AIROSA VIA SERENA VIA PARAISO
195 VIA HUERTE END CALLE CLARIN
196 VIA LADERA VIA SERENA ALTA CUESTA
197 VIA MARACA CALLE BRESCA CALLE CLARIN
198 VIA PARAISO VIA AIROSA CALLE DEL PRADO
199 VIA SALSIPUEDES END CALLE DEL PRADO
200 VIA SERENA VIA LADERA CALLE DEL PRADO

Page 184 ends

Resolution No. 2025-XXX - Page 8 of 9
201 VINMAR AVE VINMAR CT HILLSIDE RD
202 VINMAR AVE END VINMAR AVE
203 VINMAR AVE END VINMAR CT
204 VINMAR AVE 9TH ST END
205 WALKER CT GANNON ST END
206 WHIRLAWAY ST PEARL ST SAPPHIRE ST
207 WHITE MOUNTAIN CT END END
208 WINTERBERRY PL BLUE SPRUCE DR CANYON MEADOWS DR
209 WOODLAND CT END SIERRA CREST VIEW
LOOP
210 YORK PL FAIRMONT WAY DELAWARE ST
This project includes weed killing, routing and crack sealing, slurry seal, pavement markers and thermoplastic striping for approximately 25 miles of roadway. The estimated useful life of this roadway is 7 years, and construction is anticipated to start in October 2026.

Page 185 ends

Resolution No. 2025-XXX - Page 9 of 9
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this XX day of MM 2026.

Page 186 ends

DATE: June 3, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Elisa C. Cox, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Julie A. Sowles, Deputy City Manager
Jevin Kaye, Finance Director
Rick Flinchum, Deputy Director of Finance
Kelly Guerra, Special Districts Analyst
SUBJECT: Consideration of Resolutions for the Landscape Maintenance Districts, Street Lighting Maintenance Districts, and Park and Recreation Improvement District: (1) Ordering the Preparation of Annual Engineer’s Reports; (2) Approving the Preliminary Annual Engineer’s Reports; and (3) Declaring the Intention to Levy Annual Assessments and Setting the Time and Place for Public Hearings. (RESOLUTION NOS. 2026-041 to 2026-049) (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council take the following actions for Landscape Maintenance District (LMD) Nos. 1, 2, 3B, 4-R, 6-R, 7, 8, 9, and 10; Street Lighting Maintenance District (SLD) Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8; and Park and Recreation Improvement District No. 85 (PD-85) (collectively, the “Districts”):

1. Adopt Resolutions Ordering the Preparation of the Annual Engineer’s Reports;

2. Adopt Resolutions Approving the Preliminary Annual Engineer’s Reports;

3. Adopt Resolutions of Intention to Levy Annual Assessments and Set a Public Hearing for July 15, 2026.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Rancho Cucamonga oversees the management of the Districts, which involves determining the annual assessment rates property owners must pay for the maintenance and operations of the parks and landscaping within each District, such as maintaining turf, ground cover, landscape lighting, irrigation systems, graffiti removal, hardscapes, playground, and related facilities, and providing street lighting coverage, operation of street lights, traffic signals, and associated facilities, throughout the city. Each District maintains specific improvements per its boundaries, while PD-85 was established to provide for the City’s two largest parks, Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park.

Property owners pay assessments based on the maintenance districts in which their properties are located. Without the assessments, funding wouldn’t exist to provide maintenance or services to the community, and the financial burden would be directed to the City’s General Fund resources, which would take away resources from other services offered to the community.

Property owners pay the annual assessment through their property tax bills, but it is separate

Page 187 ends

Page 2 ends

3 5
0 8
from the general levy of property tax. Each year, the City Council is recommended to adopt three resolutions for the LMDs, SLDs, and PD-85, each which together performs the following steps as set by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972:

1. The City Council initiates the creation of the Annual Engineer’s Report.

2. The City Council reviews and accepts the preliminary Annual Engineer’s Report.

3. The City Council announces its intention to levy annual assessments and sets a date and location for a public hearing.

If adopted, the City Council will conduct a public hearing on July 15, 2026, and following the public hearing, the City Council may pass a resolution confirming the assessment levy as recommended.

Once this resolution is officially adopted, the Districts will be reaffirmed for the upcoming fiscal year, and the assessments will be added to the San Bernardino County tax rolls before the August deadline. These assessments will appear as a separate item on each parcel’s property tax bill.

The recommended rates were developed as part of the FY 2026-27 budget process and are included in each District's projected revenues.

ANALYSIS:

Each District within the City has its distinct improvements based on its boundaries and the community it serves. It is important to note that each District’s assessment rate must adhere to the maximum allowable rate as mandated by state law. To ensure the financial viability of each District, the City’s staff conducts an annual financial analysis. This analysis considers the current operational requirements as well as the anticipated needs for future capital replacements within each District.

During the budget process, the City staff evaluates each District’s financial situation and provides a recommendation for assessment rates to the City Council. The recommended rates are designed to align with the operational and capital needs of each District for the upcoming FY 2026-27. The recommended assessment rates are based on various factors, including inflation, the rising costs associated with providing services, and the need to secure funding for necessary capital expenditures.

City staff recommends increases to some districts to ensure that sufficient funds are available to cover the increasing costs of maintaining and operating them. Specifically, costs associated with providing services such as park maintenance, landscaping, and street lighting have increased due to labor costs, materials, and rising utility rates. Increasing rates is recommended, only when necessary, to ensure funding is set aside for future capital expenditures, which is essential for the long-term sustainability of the Districts.

In addition to the revenue from the assessments, another revenue source from certain districts is transfers of funds from the City’s General Fund. Those transfers come in two forms: mandated contributions per the engineer’s report for the portion that is considered a general benefit to the community or per the City’s General Fund Subsidy to Special District Policy. The former is legally required and is determined per Proposition 218 provisions. For the City, the only District that has a mandated contribution from the City’s General Fund is LMD-2, of which the general benefit portion is 8.62% of the operational expenditures. For FY 2026-27, LMD-2 is budgeted to receive $317,450 from the General Fund.

LMD-2 was originally formed when the Victoria area was developed in the 1990’s. At that time, the law did not require a specific general benefit calculation and apportionment. Subsequently,

Page 188 ends

Page 3 ends

3 5
0 8
when the City took LMD-2, 4 and 6 to a vote in the early 2000’s to include an inflator to allow assessments to keep pace with rising costs, the law still did not require a specific general benefit calculation and apportionment. During those respective elections, LMD-2 was voted down by the residents, and LMD-4 and 6 were approved. The two measures that passed were renamed LMD- 4R and 6R. Following the election, services were reduced in LMD-2. At the same time, the California Courts began reviewing a series of cases between 2009 and 2013 which pertained to the general benefit requirement. Ultimately, the Courts determined new LMD measures had to include a specific general benefit calculation by land use category. When LMD-2 was put back in front of the voters, following those court cases, it was approved and thus contains a legally mandated general benefit subsidy from the General Fund.

In 2015, the City took Measure A for LMD-1 and PD-85, to create new districts with an inflator to the voters. That measure also contained a minimum legally required general fund subsidy in the amount of 11%, but it was voted down overwhelmingly by the voters. Subsequently, the City determined that to subsidize only one district, even if legally required, but not provide a similar equitable amount of funding to other districts, would be impractical and inequitable. Thus, the General Fund Subsidy to Special Districts Policy was developed. The policy provides for General Fund contributions where required by law or where no other practical funding solution exists. The policy has been used to subsidize existing Street Lighting Districts (SLDs), as establishing new assessment districts and obtaining voter approval for assessments associated with existing street lighting infrastructure is generally not considered feasible. It also helps provide an equitable General Fund subsidy to all landscape districts, if needed, because the District is at the maximum allowable assessment, provided the general benefit equivalent does not exceed 11% of the adjusted total budget. That 11% factor is meant to provide equity with the east side planned communities; however, the actual subsidy factor is determined through the annual budget process and might be less than 11% based on the financial needs of the District or more than 11% when the necessary financial resources exceed that threshold.

The following LMDs and PD-85 are recommended to receive subsidies in FY 2026-27 as part of the budget approval process:
•LMD-1: A contribution of $71,330, or 4.45% of the operating expenditures. LMD-1 will also receive $134,460 for operational expenditure and $43,990 for capital replacement from Community Facilities District No. 2018-01, The Resort at Empire Lakes. •LMD-6-R: A contribution of $46,160, or 6.2% of the operating expenditures. The voters of LMD-6-R have approved an annual assessment rate escalator tied to the consumer price index, which slightly reduces the financial burden from the General Fund. •PD-85: A contribution of $143,270, allocated as $26,470 for the operations of Red Hill and Heritage Parks, equaling 3% of operating expenditures, and $116,800 for the Red Hill Water Feature, or 100% of the operating expenditures for that community-wide improvement. PD-85 will also receive $45,210 for operational expenditures and $52,710 for capital replacement from Community Facilities District No. 2018-01, The Resort at Empire Lakes.

For SLDs, the subsidy may exceed 11%, as previously stated, because service levels cannot be reduced as they can for LMDs. Accordingly, General Fund transfers are budgeted only to the extent necessary to eliminate projected operating deficits or maintain minimum reserve levels.

However, with the formation of Community Facilities District No. 2022-01, Street Lighting Services, the new development will provide additional funding to SLDs, which, over an extended period, should reduce the financial burden on the City’s General Fund.

Page 189 ends

Page 4 ends

3 5
0 8
•SLD-1: Will receive supplemental funding of $25,920 for the operating expenditures from Community Facilities District No. 2018-01, the Resort at Empire Lakes, and $25,960 from Community Facilities District No. 2022-01, Street Lighting Services. •SLD-2: A contribution of $29,410 or 6.6% of the operating expenditures. SLD-2 will also receive $71,220 from Community Facilities District No. 2018-01, the Resort at Empire Lakes, and $25,570 from Community Facilities District No. 2022-01, Street Lighting Services.
•SLD-5: A contribution of $13,010, or 29% of the operating expenditures, due to the negative fund balance.
•SLD-6: A contribution of $300 for the operational expenditures from Community Facilities District No. 2018-01, the Resort at Empire Lakes, and $8,980 from Community Facilities District No. 2022-01, Street Lighting Services.
•SLD-7: A contribution of $8,440, or 6.1% of the operating expenditures and $140 from Community Facilities District No. 2022-01, Street Lighting Services.

Incorporating the above analysis of transfers from the City’s General Fund, the following is an additional analysis for consideration about the recommended assessment rates for the FY 2026- 27:
•Due to changes in State law with Proposition 218, the City cannot increase assessment rates without voter approval for certain Districts. These Districts include LMD-1, LMD-7, LMD-8, SLDs 1 to 7, and PD-85. In these cases, staff evaluates opportunities to reduce operating costs or defer non-essential capital improvements to keep the District from being in a deficit. As indicated above, some of these Districts receive funding from the City’s General Fund in the form of General Benefit Equivalent funding to support operations. As previously mentioned, that funding is approved by the City Council per City policy. •No changes are recommended for the assessment rates in LMD-3B and SLD-8, as staff have determined that the current rates are sufficient to meet the operational needs of these Districts.
•A 5% increase is recommended for LMD-2, from $589.22 to $618.68, which is below the maximum allowable rate of $631.96. This increase is necessary to cover rising operational costs and fund planned capital improvement projects.
•A 5% increase is recommended for LMD-4-R, from $451.00 to $473.55 per single-family residence, also below the maximum allowable rate of $565.04. This increase is required to address increased operational costs and support capital improvement projects. •A 3.0% increase is recommended for LMD-6-R, from $519.13 to $534.70 per single-family residence, which is the maximum increase allowable. This increase is required to address increased operational costs.
•A 7% increase is recommended for LMD-9, from $321.28 to $343.77 per single-family residence, also below the maximum allowable rate of $765.19. This increase is necessary to cover rising operational costs and fund planned future capital improvement projects. •A 5% increase is recommended for LMD-10, from $914.05 to $959.75 per single-family residence, remaining below the maximum allowable rate of $1,177.48. This increase is necessary to cover increased operational costs and fund planned future capital improvement projects.

The table below displays the maximum assessment rate, the current assessment rate, and the recommended assessment rate for FY 2026-27.

Page 190 ends

Page 5 ends

3 5
0 8
District
Maximum
Assessment
Rate
Current
Assessment
Rate
Recommended
Assessment Rate
(FY 2026/27)
Notes
LMD-1
(General City) $92.21 $92.21 $92.21 A rate increase would require voter approval.

LMD-2
(Victoria
Neighborhoods
Parks)
$631.96 $589.22 $618.68
Recommend a 5.0% increase
to reflect inflation costs and
planned future capital
improvement projects.

LMD-3B
(Commercial
Industrial)
$352.80 $282.24 $282.24 No change is recommended.

LMD-4-R
(Terra Vista
Planned
Community)
$565.04 $451.00 $473.55
Recommend a 5.0%
increase to reflect inflation
costs and planned capital
improvement projects.

LMD-6-R
(Caryn Planned
Community)
$534.70 $519.13 $534.70
Recommend a 3.0%
increase for the operating
financial gap.

LMD-7
(North Etiwanda) $307.05 $307.05 $307.05 A rate increase would require voter approval.

LMD-8
(South Etiwanda) $151.45 $151.45 $151.45 A rate increase would require voter approval.

LMD-9
(Lower Etiwanda) $765.19 $321.28 $343.77
Recommend a 7.0%
increase to reflect inflation
costs and planned capital
improvement projects.

LMD-10
(Rancho
Etiwanda)
$1,177.8 $914.05 $959.75
Recommend a 5.0%
increase to reflect inflation
costs and planned future
capital projects.

SLD-1
(Arterials) $17.77 $17.77 $17.77 A rate increase would
require voter approval.

SLD-2
(Local Streets) $39.97 $39.97 $39.97 A rate increase would require voter approval.

SLD-3
(Victoria Planned
Community)
$47.15 $47.15 $47.15 A rate increase would
require voter approval.

SLD-4
(Terra Vista
Planned
Community)
$28.96 $28.96 $28.96 A rate increase would
require voter approval.

SLD-5
(Caryn Planned
Community)
$34.60 $34.60 $34.60 A rate increase would
require voter approval.

SLD-6
(Commercial
Industrial)
$51.40 $51.40 $51.40 A rate increase would
require voter approval.

SLD-7
(North Etiwanda) $33.32 $33.32 $33.32 A rate increase would require voter approval.

Page 191 ends

Page 6 ends

3 5
0 8
District
Maximum
Assessment
Rate
Current
Assessment
Rate
Recommended
Assessment Rate
(FY 2026/27)
Notes
SLD-8
(South Etiwanda) $193.75 $30.60 $30.60 No change is recommended.

PD-85
(Red Hill and
Heritage Parks)
$31.00 $31.00 $31.00 A rate increase would require
voter approval.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Assessment revenues collected for each District are dedicated to its maintenance, operations, and capital improvements. As previously stated, each District covers the costs of maintenance that benefit the community's property owners. Without these Districts’ assessments, and without the assessment funding that the District provides, the financial burden of maintaining those specific improvements would be the responsibility of the City's general tax dollars, and the City's General Fund would not be able to provide as vigorous and well-rounded services as it does.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

This item addresses the City Council’s core value of providing courageous leadership in service to the community, promoting a sustainable future and maintaining a relentless pursuit of improvement by ensuring the City can deliver parks and landscaping services that enhance beautification and provide opportunities for recreation and leisure. It also emphasizes the Council’s commitment to actively seeking community engagement by making these reports available for the public and scheduling a public hearing on July 15, 2026.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Resolution LMD Preparation of Engineer’s Report Attachment 2 – Resolution LMD Approving Preliminary Annual Engineer’s Report Attachment 3 – Resolution LMD Declare Intention to Levy Assessment & Set Pub Hearing Attachment 4 – Preliminary Engineer’s Report LMD-1
Attachment 5 – Preliminary Engineer’s Report LMD-2
Attachment 6 – Preliminary Engineer’s Report LMD-3B
Attachment 7 – Preliminary Engineer’s Report LMD-4-R
Attachment 8 – Preliminary Engineer’s Report LMD-6-R
Attachment 9 – Preliminary Engineer’s Report LMD-7
Attachment 10 – Preliminary Engineer’s Report LMD-8
Attachment 11 – Preliminary Engineer’s Report LMD-9
Attachment 12 – Preliminary Engineer’s Report LMD-10
Attachment 13 – Resolution SLD Preparation of Engineer’s Report Attachment 14 – Resolution SLD Approving Preliminary Annual Engineer’s Report Attachment 15 – Resolution SLD Declare Intention to Levy Assessment & Set Pub Hearing Attachment 16 – Preliminary Engineer’s Report SLD-1
Attachment 17 – Preliminary Engineer’s Report SLD-2
Attachment 18 – Preliminary Engineer’s Report SLD-3
Attachment 19 – Preliminary Engineer’s Report SLD-4
Attachment 20 – Preliminary Engineer’s Report SLD-5
Attachment 21 – Preliminary Engineer’s Report SLD-6
Attachment 22 – Preliminary Engineer’s Report SLD-7
Attachment 23 – Preliminary Engineer’s Report SLD-8
Attachment 24 – Resolution PD-85 Preparation of Engineer’s Report Attachment 25 – Resolution PD-85 Approving Preliminary Annual Engineer’s Report

Page 192 ends

Page 7 ends

3 5
0 8
Attachment 26 – Resolution PD-85 Declare Intention to Levy Assessment & Set Pub Hearing Attachment 27 – Preliminary Engineer’s Report PD-85

Page 193 ends

Resolution No. 2026-XXX – Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO

CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF
ANNUAL ENGINEER’S REPORTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS

OF THE ASSESSMENT LAW FOR PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL

ASSESSMENT LEVY WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NOS. 1, 2, 3B, 4 -R, 6 -R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026/27

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously undertaken proceedings to form and has formed certain maintenance districts pursuant to the terms and provisions of the “Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972”, being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 22500) (the “1972 Act”), known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3B, 4-R, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 and 10, inclusive (each, a “District” and collectively, the “Districts”); and

WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to initiate proceedings pursuant to Chapter 3 of the 1972 Act to authorize the proposed new improvements and provide for the annual levy of assessments for the next ensuing fiscal year to provide for the annual costs for maintenance and servicing of improvements within the Districts; and

WHEREAS, the proceedings for the annual levy of assessments shall relate to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2026, and ending June 30, 2027 (“Fiscal Year 2026/27”).

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,

HEREBY RESOLVES,
SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct.

SECTION 2. New Improvements or Substantial Changes in Existing Improvements. No new improvements are proposed to be added to the improvements to be maintained or serviced and no substantial changes in the existing improvements are proposed to be made for Fiscal Year 2026/27.

SECTION 3. Annual Engineer’s Reports. The City Engineer is hereby ordered to prepare and file with this City Council an Annual Engineer’s Report for each District relating to such annual assessment and levy in such District in accordance with the provisions of 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California (“Article XIIID”) and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the “Implementation Act”) (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the “Assessment Law”).

SECTION 4. Filing of the Annual Engineer’s Reports. Upon completion, the Annual Engineer’s Report for each District shall be filed with the City Clerk, who shall then submit the same to this City Council for its consideration pursuant to the Assessment Law.

Page 194 ends

Resolution No. 2025-XXX – Page 2 of 2

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this ________ day of ______________ 2026.

Page 195 ends

Resolution No. 2026-XXX – Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT 2
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO

CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY
ANNUAL ENGINEER’S REPORTS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF

ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NOS. 1, 2, 3B, 4 -R, 6 -R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026/27

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, pursuant to the provisions of Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the “1972 Act”), Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California (“Article XIIID”) and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the “Implementation Act”) (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the “Assessment Law”), did, by previous Resolution, order the preparation of a separate report for the annual levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 202 6/27 (each, an “Annual Engineer’s Report”) in certain maintenance assessment districts known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3B, 4-R, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 and 10, inclusive (each, a “District” and collectively, the “Districts”); and

WHEREAS, there has now been presented to this City Council a separate Annual Engineer’s Report for each District as required by the Assessment Law and as previously directed by Resolution; and

WHEREAS, this City Council has now examined and reviewed each Annual Engineer’s Report as presented, and is satisfied with each and all of the items and documents as set forth in each such report, and is satisfied that the assessments , on a preliminary basis, have been allocated within each District in accordance with the special benefits received from the improvements to be maintained and serviced, as set forth in the applicable Annual Engineer’s Report.

WHEREAS, the annual assessments for Fiscal Year 202 6/27 proposed to be levied within each District as set forth in the applicable report do not exceed the annual assessments as previously authorized to be levied within such District and, therefore, the proposed levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2026/27 within such District are not deemed to be “increased” over the maximum authorized annual assessments.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,

HEREBY RESOLVES,
SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct.

SECTION 2. Annual Engineer’s Reports. The Annual Engineer’s Report for each District as presented, consisting of the following:

A. Plans and specifications describing the general nature, location, and extent of the improvements to be maintained and serviced and the extent of such maintenance; B. An estimate of the cost of the maintenance of the improvements for the District for Fiscal Year 2026/27;
C. A diagram for such District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed;

Page 196 ends

Resolution No. 2026-XXX – Page 2 of 2

D. An annual assessment for Fiscal Year 2026/27 of the estimated costs of the maintenance and servicing of those improvements to be maintained and serviced during such Fiscal Year, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within such District in proportion to the special benefits received is hereby approved on a preliminary basis and is ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open for public inspection;
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, and the minutes of this meeting shall so reflect the presentation of the Annual Engineer’s Reports.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _______ day of _____________ 2026.

Page 197 ends

Resolution No. 2026-XXX – Page 1 of 5
ATTACHMENT 3
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO

CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO

PROVIDE FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF
ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 20 26/27 IN LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3B, 4 -R, 6 -R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10,

INCLUSIVE, AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC

HEARING THEREON

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed certain maintenance districts and authorized the levy of assessments therein pursuant to the terms and provisions of the “Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972,” being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 22500) (the “1972 Act”) in what are known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3B, 4 -R, 6 -R, 7, 8, 9 and 10, inclusive (each a “District” and collectively, the “Districts”); and

WHEREAS, this City Council has initiated proceedings to provide for the annual levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 202 6/27, to finance the costs and expenses necessary for continued maintenance and servicing of improvements within each District; and

WHEREAS, at this time, there has been presented and approved by this City Council, a separate report for each District identified by the distinctive designation of such District and entitled “Fiscal Year 2026/27 Annual Engineer’s Report” (each, an “Annual Engineer’s Report” and collectively, the “Annual Engineer’s Reports”) as required pursuant to Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California (“Article XIIID”) and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the “Implementation Act”) (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the “Assessment Law”), and this City Council desires to conduct the proceedings to authorize the levy of the annual assessments within each District; and

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,

HEREBY RESOLVES,
SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct.

SECTION 2. Improvements and Maintenance and Servicing Thereof. The public interest and convenience requires the City Council , and it is the intention of this City Council, to undertake proceedings for the annual levy and collection of assessments within each District for the continual maintenance and servicing of the improvements authorized to be maintained and serviced within each such District.

The improvements include, but are not limited to, turf, ground cover, planter beds, shrubs, plants and trees, landscape lighting, irrigation systems, electrical energy for irrigation controllers, hardscapes, entry signs, sound walls, and all ass ociated appurtenant facilities. A description of the specific improvements to be maintained and serviced within each District is set forth in Appendix A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

Page 198 ends

Resolution No. 2026-XXX – Page 2 of 5

"Maintenance" may include the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including: (a) repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement; (b) providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury; (c) the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste; and (d) the cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti. "Service" may include the furnishing of: (a) electric current or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for the lighting or operation of any improvements; and (b) water for the irrigation of any landscaping, the operation of any fountains, or the maintenance of any other improvements.

Reference is made to the applicable Annual Engineer’s Report for further information regarding the improvements to be maintained and serviced for each District and the scope of such maintenance and service.

SECTION 3. Annual Engineer’s Reports. The Annual Engineer’s Reports regarding the annual levy for each District for Fiscal Year 2026/27 have been preliminarily approved and directed to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk. Reference is made to the applicable such report for each District for a full and detailed description of the improvements to be maintained and serviced, the boundaries of such District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within such District.

SECTION 4. Assessment. The public interest and convenience requires, and it is the intention of this City Council to order , the annual levy of assessments for each District as set forth and described in the applicable Annual Engineer’s Report, and further it is determined to be in the best public interest and convenience to levy and collect annual assessments to pay the costs and expenses of such maintenance and service as estimated in such Annual Engineer’s Report.

SECTION 5. Boundaries o f Districts. The proposed maintenance and service work as described in the Annual Engineer’s Report for each District is, in the opinion of this City Council, of special benefit to the properties within the boundaries of such District, and this City Council makes the costs and expenses of such maintenance and service chargeable upon each such District, which District said City Council hereby declares to be the District specially benefited by such maintenance and service, and to be further assessed pursuant to the Assessment Law to pay the costs and expenses thereof.

Each such District shall include each and every parcel of land within the boundaries thereof; as such District is shown on a map or maps as approved by this City Council and on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and so designated by the name of such District.

SECTION 6. Public Hearing. Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the 15th day of July 2026, at the hour of 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the regular meeting of the City Council, being in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, which is the time and place fixed by this City Council for the hearing of protests or objections in reference to the annual levy of assessments, to the extent of the maintenance, by any interested person and any other matters contained in this resolution. Any persons who wish to object to the proceedings for the annual levy should file a written protest with the City Clerk prior to the time set and scheduled for said public hearing.

SECTION 7. For Information Regarding Proceedings. For any and all information relating to the proceedings, protest procedure, any documentation and/or information of a procedural or technical nature, your attention is directed to the below listed person at the City:

Page 199 ends

Resolution No. 2026-XXX – Page 3 of 5

Jevin Kaye
Finance Director
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
(909) 774-2403

SECTION 8. Notice. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish, pursuant to Government Code Section 6061, a copy of this Resolution in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation within said City, said publication shall be made one time and not less than ten (10) days before the date set for the Public Hearing.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _______ day of ______________ 2026.

Page 200 ends

Resolution No. 2026-XXX – Page 4 of 5

Appendix A

Descriptions of Improvements

This Appendix A contains general descriptions of the improvements to be maintained and serviced within each of the Districts. Please refer to the Annual Engineer’s Report for a full and complete description of the maintenance and service to be provided for each District.

Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
Landscaping:

Parkways (includes turf and ground cover)
Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover)
Paseos
Street Trees
Entry Monuments
Community Trails
Playground at Andover Place and Bedford Drive
Parks: Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park s, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park, Hermosa Park, and Don Tiburcio Tapia Park (undeveloped)

Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
Landscaping:

Parkways (includes turf and ground cover)
Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover)
Paseos
Street Trees
Entry Monuments
Parks: Ellena Park, Kenyon Park, Victoria Arbors Park, Victoria Groves Park, Vintage Park and Windrows Park
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B
Landscaping:

Parkways (includes turf and ground cover)
Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover)
Street Trees
Entry Monuments
Metrolink

Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R
Landscaping:

Parkways (includes turf and ground cover)
Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover)
Paseos
Street Trees
Parks: Spruce Park, Mountain View Park, Ralph M. Lewis Park, Coyote Canyon Park, Milliken Park and West Greenway Park

Page 201 ends

Resolution No. 2026-XXX – Page 5 of 5

Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R
Landscaping:

Parkways (includes turf and ground cover)
Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover)
Paseos
Street Trees
Community Trails
Landscape Maintenance District No. 7
Landscaping:

Parkways (includes turf and ground cover)
Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover)
Paseos
Street Trees
Community Trails
Parks: Etiwanda Creek Community Park
Landscape Maintenance District No. 8
Landscaping:

Parkways (includes turf and ground cover)
Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover)
Paseos
Street Trees
Community Trails
Landscape Maintenance District No. 9
Landscaping:

Parkways (includes turf and ground cover)
Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover)
Street Trees
Parks: Garcia Park
Landscape Maintenance District No. 10
Landscaping:

Parkways (includes turf and ground cover)
Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover)
Street Trees
Community Trails
Parks: Day Creek Park

Page 202 ends

ATTACHMENT 4

Preliminary Annual Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2026/27

City of Rancho Cucamonga
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
(General City)

Page 203 ends

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
(GENERAL CITY)
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Phone: 909.477.2700
Fax: 909.477.2845

CITY COUNCIL
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem
Ryan A. Hutchison, Council Member
Kristine D. Scott, Council Member
Ashley N. Stickler, Council Member

CITY STAFF
Elisa C. Cox, City Manager
Mike McCliman, Assistant City Manager/Fire Chief
Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Maritza Martinez, Public Works Services Director
Jevin Kaye, Finance Director

Page 204 ends

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ENGINEER’S LETTER 1
INTRODUCTION 3
Reason for Assessment 3
Process for Annual Assessment 3
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4
Description of the Boundaries of the District 4
Description of Improvements and Services 4
Map of Improvements 20
ESTIMATE OF COSTS 21
District Budget 22
Definitions of Budget Items 24
METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 25
Overview 25
General Benefit 26
Special Benefit 26
Method of Assessment Spread 27
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 28
ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 30
Assessment Roll 30
Annexations 30

Page 205 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2026/27
ENGINEER’S LETTER
WHEREAS, on June 3, 2026, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the “City”), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the “1972 Act”) adopted its Resolution No. 2026-XXX, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) (the “District”); and

WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act.

NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment.

Fiscal Year
2026/27 Budget
Expenditures
Personnel Services 81,720$
Operations and Maintenance 1,599,390
Transfer Out 90,000
Total Expenditures Budget 1,771,110
Revenues
Taxes:

Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 1,286,640 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 12,220
Subtotal - Taxes 1,298,860
Other Revenues 53,820
Transfer In 339,780
Total Revenues Budget 1,692,460
Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance (78,650)$
Total District EBU Count 13,862.18
Actual Assessment per EBU 92.21$
Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU 92.21$

Page 206 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2026/27
In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act:

1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer’s Report (the “Specially Benefited Parcels”). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer’s Report.

2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation:

a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entiret y of the maintenance costs of the improvements;

b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and

c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed.

I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer’s Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer’s Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law.

07/15/26

Jason C. Welday
Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Date

Page 207 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2026/27

INTRODUCTION
Reason for Assessment
Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer’s Report will generate the revenue necessary to:

Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer’s Report. Maintenance may include, but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District.

Process for Annual Assessment
The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer’s Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improv ements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District.

The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which:
• Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein.
• Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements.
• Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District.
• Refers to the Engineer’s Report , on file with the City Clerk , for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment.
• States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year.

If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon

Page 208 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2026/27
conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment.

The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing, must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment.

If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, o r opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment.

PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right -of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District.

Description of the Boundaries of the District
The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City which is not located within the City's planned development communities. The District is made up of various landscaped sites throughout the City. As such, the parcels within the District do not represent a distinct district area as do the other landscape maintenance districts within the City. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed.

Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report.

Description of Improvements and Services
The improvements maintained by the District include the paseos, community trails, trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the District. These improvements are located within the street right -of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, a nd turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble- shooting, repair and

Page 209 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2026/27
replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows:

Parks: Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park, Hermosa Park, and the undeveloped Don Tiburcio Tapia Park.

Site # Descriptive Location

A-1 The north and south side of Wilson Ave from Hellman Ave to Amethyst Ave.

Ground Cover area: 22,982 square feet
Hardscape area: 5,694 square feet

A-2 The east side of Hellman Ave from 326 feet south of Pepperidge Ln to 73 feet north of Pepperidge Ln.

Ground Cover area: 5,810 square feet
Hardscape area: 1,600 square feet
A-3 The south side of 19th St from 62 feet east of Mayberry Ave to 173 feet east of Mayberry Ave.

Ground Cover area: 1,680 square feet
Hardscape area: 440 square feet

A-4 The south side of Wilson Ave from Amethyst Ave to Archibald Ave; the planters and cutouts on the west side of Archibald Ave from Wilson Ave to 105 feet south of Cottonwood Way.

Ground Cover area: 5,625 square feet
A-5 The north and south side of Diamond Ave from Klusman Ave to Diamond Ave.

Ground Cover area: 3,143 square feet
Hardscape area: 1,864 square feet
A-6 The parkway on the north side of Wilson Ave from 348 feet east of Morning Canyon Way to Alder Ridge Pl.

Ground Cover area: 5,700 square feet
Hardscape area: 4,760 square feet

Page 210 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2026/27
A-7 The cutouts and vines on the south side of Wilson Ave from the Alta Loma Channel to 240 feet east of Zapata Pl.

Ground Cover area: 911 square feet

A-8 The east side of Broken Star Ct from 80 feet south of Highland Ave to Highland Ave; the north side of Highland Ave from Amethyst Ave to Broken Star Ct including wood chip area north of sidewalk, the south side of Highland Ave from Broken Star Ct to Amethyst Ave; the west side of Amethyst Ave from 140 feet south of Highland Ave to 265 feet south of Highland Ave.

Ground Cover area: 6,545 square feet
Hardscape area: 2,554 square feet
Mulchscape area: 14,005 square feet

A-9 The south side of Highland Ave from Hellman Ave to Broken Star Ct.

Ground Cover area: 7,865 square feet
A-10 The south side of 19th St from 170 feet west of Pilgrim Ct to 167 feet east of Pilgrim Ct.

Ground Cover area: 1,808 square feet
Hardscape area: 1,084 square feet
A-11 The east side of Amethyst Ave from Lemon Ave to 230 feet north of Apricot Ave.

Ground Cover area: 2,115 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,438 square feet

A-12 The west side of Sapphire St from 710 feet north of Hillside Rd to Hillside Rd.

Ground Cover area: 4,500 square feet
A-13 The south side of Victoria St from 110 feet west of London Ave to Ramona Ave.

Ground Cover area: 2,705 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,480 square feet
A-14 The west side of Archibald Ave from 273 feet north of La Gloria Dr to Lemon Ave; the La Gloria Dr median from Archibald Ave to Jadeite Ave; the north and south side of La Gloria Dr from Archibald Ave to 53 feet east of Jadeite Ave; the north side of Lemon Ave from Archibald Ave to 55 feet east of Klusman Ave.

Ground Cover area: 12,880 square feet
Hardscape area: 12,030 square feet

Page 211 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2026/27
A-15 The planters and cutouts on the east side of Archibald Ave from 610 feet south of Cottonwood Way to Wilson Ave; the south side of Wilson Ave from Archibald Ave to Alta Loma Channel.

Ground Cover area: 2,110 square feet

A-16 The cutouts and planters on the east side of Archibald Ave from Banyan St to 190 feet north of Sunflower St.

Ground Cover area: 1,580 square feet
A-17 The cutouts and planters on the west side of Archibald Ave from 225 feet south of Wilson Ave to Banyan St.

Ground Cover area: 2,362 square feet

A-18 The cutouts and planters on the north side of Banyan St from Jadeite Ave to 410 feet west of Jadeite Ave.

Ground Cover area: 216 square feet
A-19 The cutouts and planters on the east side of Amethyst Ave from 192 feet south of Sunflower St to Manzanita Dr.

Ground Cover area: 4,325 square feet
A-20 The west side of Archibald Ave from 210 feet north of La Colina Dr to 230 feet south of Almond St; the south side of La Colina Dr from Archibald Ave to Jadeite Ave.

Ground Cover area: 17,120 square feet
A-21 The planter adjacent to the equestrian trail from Riverwood Pl to Raspberry Pl north of the County flood retention basin that is west of Chaffey College.

Ground Cover area: 22,832 square feet
A-22 The west side of Haven Ave from Carrari St to Vista Grove St.

Ground Cover area: 4,572 square feet

A-23 The west side of Haven Ave from 434 feet north of Manzanita Dr to 258 feet south of Manzanita Dr.

Ground Cover area: 54,258 square feet
Hardscape area: 4,581 square feet
A-24 The south side of 19th St from 286 feet east of Amethyst Ave to 166 feet west of Klusman Ave.

Ground Cover area: 5,904 square feet
Hardscape area: 2,938 square feet

Page 212 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2026/27
A-25 Site decommissioned. Water and Electrical utilities cancelled November 1, 2019.

A-26 The west side of Haven Ave from 630 feet north of Wilson Ave to Wilson Ave; the parkway on the north side of Wilson Ave from Haven Ave to Mayberry Ave; the parkway on the east side of Mayberry Ave from Wilson Ave to 382 feet north of Poplar St, and the east and west side of Cartilla Ave from Wilson Ave to Poplar St.

Ground Cover area: 10,243 square feet
Mulchscape area: 25,297 square feet

A-27 The north side of 19th St from Mayberry Ave to 93 feet east of Castle Gate Pl.

Ground Cover area: 5,145 square feet
Hardscape area: 2,870 square feet

A-28 The east side of Hermosa Ave from 360 feet south of Manzanita Dr to Manzanita Dr, and the south side of Manzanita Dr from Hermosa Ave to Raspberry Pl.

Ground Cover area: 7,421 square feet
Hardscape area: 4,712 square feet
A-29 The south side of Wilson Ave from 240 feet west of Timbermist Pl to Hermosa Ave; the west side of Hermosa Ave from Wilson Ave to 213 feet south of Oakgrove Dr.

Ground Cover area: 11,184 square feet
A-30 Site was removed from contract and water service cancelled January 1, 2017.

A-31 The south side of Lemon Ave from London Ave to Calle Hermoso.

Ground Cover area: 4,404 square feet
Hardscape area: 1,800 square feet

A-32 The north side of Lemon Ave from the Alta Loma Channel to London Ave; the east side of London Ave from Lemon Ave to Cypress Ct.

Ground Cover area: 4,463 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,375 square feet

A-33 The parkway on the east side of London Ave from 158 feet north of Banyan St to 310 feet north of Banyan St.

Ground Cover area: 1,029 square feet
Hardscape area: 1,160 square feet

Page 213 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2026/27
A-34 The south side of Alta Loma Dr from Mayberry Ave to Revere Ave.

Ground Cover area: 2,772 square feet
1,512 square feet of ground cover was deleted from this site on July 1, 2000.

A-35 The west side of Hermosa Ave from Lemon Ave to 125 feet north of Highland Ave, the parkway on the south side of Lemon Ave from 621 feet west of Hermosa Ave to Hermosa Ave.

Ground Cover area: 10,494 square feet
Hardscape area: 9,207 square feet
Mulchscape area: 2,370 square feet

A-36 The south side of Lemon Ave from 385 feet west of Mayberry Ave to Cartilla Ave.

Ground Cover area: 4,850 square feet
Hardscape area: 4,915 square feet

A-37 The south side of Hillside Rd north and south of the equestrian trail from Beryl St to 203 feet east of Eastwood Ave.

Ground Cover area: 4,900 square feet

A-38 The median in the 9200 block of Monte Vista St.

Ground Cover area: 500 square feet
Hardscape area: 1,380 square feet
A-39 The south side of Almond St from Henry St to Sapphire St. The west side of Sapphire St from Almond St to 255 feet south of Bella Vista Dr.

Ground Cover area: 6,926 square feet
A-40 The parkway on the east side of Jasper St from Hunter Dr to Highland Ave. The parkway on the south side of Highland Ave from Jasper St to Carnelian St. The west side of Carnelian St from Highland Ave to 210 feet south of Highland Ave.

Ground Cover area: 14,858 square feet
Hardscape area: 6,040 square feet
A-41 The west side of Sapphire St from 236 feet north of Thoroughbred St to Banyan St.

Ground Cover area: 1,784 square feet
Hardscape area: 812 square feet

A-42 The parkway on the west side of Beryl St from 132 feet north of Sunflower St to Banyan St.

Ground Cover area: 4,735 square feet
Hardscape area: 5,772 square feet

Page 214 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2026/27
A-43 The north side of Base Line Rd from Topaz St to the Cucamonga Creek Channel.

Ground Cover area: 4,563 square feet
Hardscape area: 1,890 square feet
A-44 The cutouts on the west side of Sapphire St from Banyan St to Marble Ave.

Ground Cover area: 7,300 square feet
A-45 The mainline for this site was connected to A-46 on September 8, 1999.

A-46 The south side of Banyan St from Northstar Pl to Zircon Ave.

Ground Cover area: 7,448 square feet
Hardscape area: 7,890 square feet
A-47 The cutouts and vines on the north side of Banyan St from 180 feet east of Zircon Ave to 186 feet west of Vineyard Ave.

Ground Cover area: 1,300 square feet

A-48 The parkway on the west side of Beryl St from 452 feet north of Cielito St; 158 feet south of Cielito St and the easement between 9063 and 9073 Cielito St from Cielito St to 170 feet south of Cielito St.

Ground Cover area: 6,916 square feet
Hardscape area: 2,440 square feet

A-49 The east side of Carnelian St from 662 feet south of Banyan St to Banyan St; the south side of Banyan St from Carnelian St to Northstar Pl.

Ground Cover area: 5,906 square feet
Hardscape area: 6,972 square feet

A-50 The north side of Almond St from Sapphire St to Crestview Pl; the east and west side of Skyline Rd from Almond St to 595 feet north of Almond St.

Ground Cover area: 17,600 square feet
Hardscape area: 8,680 square feet

A-51 The planter adjacent to the equestrian trail; from Haven Ave to Riverwood Pl, north of County flood retention basin, west of Chaffey College. The west side of Haven Ave from 400 feet north of Amber Ln to 270 feet south of Amber Ln, and the north and south side of Amber Ln from Haven Ave to San Felipe Ct.

Ground Cover area: 37,977 square feet
Hardscape area: 5,458 square feet

Page 215 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2026/27
A-52 The east side of Riverwood Pl, from 188 feet south of Charwood Ct to 193 feet north of Charwood Ct.

Ground Cover area: 2,750 square feet
Hardscape area: 1,698 square feet
A-53 The west side of Jasper St from Hunter Dr to Highland Ave. The south side of Highland from Jasper St to 308 feet west of Sard St. The east and west side of Sard St from Highland Ave to Hunter Dr.

Ground Cover area: 7,445 square feet
Hardscape area: 4,740 square feet
A-54 The west side of Beryl St from 233 feet north of Mignonette St to Mignonette St.

Ground Cover area: 2,637 square feet
Hardscape area: 932 square feet
A-55 The north side of 19th St from Cartilla Ave to Mayberry Ave. The east side of Mayberry Ave from 19th St to Heather St.

Ground Cover area: 8,410 square feet
Hardscape area: 5,060 square feet

A-56 The east side of Beryl St from 410 feet north of Wilson Ave to Wilson Ave. The north side of Wilson Ave from Beryl St to 731 feet west of Buckthorn Ave. The south side of Wilson Ave from Buckthorn Ave to Beryl St.

Ground Cover area: 19,708 square feet
Hardscape area: 5,436 square feet

A-57 The east side of Hermosa Ave from 115 feet north of Coca St to 451 feet north of Coca St. The trail north of water retention basin from Hermosa Ave to 619 feet east of Hermosa Ave.

Ground Cover area: 9,406 square feet
Hardscape area: 6,794 square feet

A-58 The west side of Haven Ave from 510 feet south of Victoria St to 1005 feet south of Victoria St.

Ground Cover area: 7,301 square feet
Hardscape area: 4,790 square feet

A-59 The east side of Archibald Ave from 820 feet south of Lemon Ave to 448 feet south of Lemon Ave and continues from 275 feet south of Lemon Ave to 185 south of Lemon Ave.

Ground Cover area: 4,777 square feet
Hardscape area: 5,041 square feet

Page 216 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2026/27
A-60 The south side of Lemon Ave from 290 feet east of Archibald Ave to London Ave. The west side of London Ave from Lemon Ave to Orange St.

Ground Cover area: 2,569 square feet
Hardscape area: 4,122 square feet

A-61 The north side of Carrari St from London Ave to Archibald Ave.

Ground Cover area: 25,152 square feet
Hardscape area: 1,698 square feet
A-62 The east side of Archibald Ave from Carrari St to 505 feet north of Meadowood Dr.

Ground Cover area: 8,626 square feet
Hardscape area: 1,824 square feet
A-63 The south side of Almond St from Carriage Rd to Almond St.

Ground Cover area: 3,342 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,600 square feet
A-64 The east side of Beryl St from Cottonwood Way to Wilson Ave. The south side of Wilson Ave from Beryl St to 437 feet east of Beryl St. The north side of Wilson Ave from Cousins Pl to 474 feet east of Cousins Pl.

Ground Cover area: 11,973 square feet
Hardscape area: 9,949 square feet

A-65 The east side of Archibald Ave from La Gloria Dr to 328 feet north of La Gloria Dr.

Ground Cover area: 2,279 square feet
Hardscape area: 2,411 square feet
A-66 The east side of Hermosa Ave from Waterford Ln to 500 feet north of Waterford Ln.

Ground Cover area: 4,695 square feet
Hardscape area: 5,947 square feet

A-67 The south side of 19th St from 220 feet east of Sapphire St to Via Serena.

Ground Cover area: 3,208 square feet
Hardscape area: 4,158 square feet

A-68 The west side of Haven Ave from Hillside Rd to 783 feet south of Hillside Rd.

Ground Cover area: 3,492 square feet
A-69 The north side of Hillside Rd from 27 feet west of Mayberry Ave to 191 feet west of Mayberry Ave.

Ground Cover area: 1,002 square feet
Hardscape area: 1,605 square feet

Page 217 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2026/27
A-70 The south side of 19th St from 365 feet west of Amethyst Ave to Amethyst Ave. The west side of Amethyst Ave from 19th to Hedges Dr.

Ground Cover area: 6,435 square feet
Hardscape area: 7,015 square feet

A-71 The west side of Archibald Ave from Hillside Rd to Wilson Ave. The north side of Wilson Ave, south of the trail fence area from Archibald Ave to 467 feet west of Archibald Ave.

Ground Cover area: 9,265 square feet
Hardscape area: 2,609 square feet
A-72 The south side of Banyan St from 420 feet west of Archibald Ave to Archibald Ave. The west side of Archibald Ave from Banyan St to 389 feet south of Banyan St.

Ground Cover area: 10,270 square feet
Hardscape area: 6,673 square feet
A-73 The west side of Beryl St from 300 feet north of San Simeon Dr to 130 feet north of San Simeon Dr.

Ground Cover area: 1,200 square feet
Hardscape area: 600 square feet
A-74 The south side of Highland Ave from Beryl St to Hellman Ave.

Ground Cover area: 11,603 square feet
A-75 The south side of Highland Ave from Amethyst Ave to 612 feet east of Archibald Ave.

Ground Cover area: 106,409 square feet
Hardscape area: 60,608 square feet
A-76 The west side of Archibald Ave from 635 feet north of Hillside Rd to Hillside Rd. The north side of Hillside Rd from Archibald Ave to 770 feet west of Archibald Ave.

Ground Cover area: 8,859 square feet
Hardscape area: 1,389 square feet

A-77 The east side of Carnelian St from Brilliant Ln to Wilson Ave including the irrigation cut- outs along trail. The south side of Wilson Ave from Carnelian St to 745 feet east of Arabian Dr. The irrigation cut -outs on the north side of Wilson Ave from Carnelian St to 775 feet east of Arabian Dr.

Ground Cover area: 5,101 square feet
Hardscape area: 11,322 square feet
B-1 The median on Blue Gum Dr from Etiwanda Ave to Blue Gum Dr.

Mulchscape area: 5,100 square feet
Entire site converted from ground cover to Mulchscape. Trees and irrigation to remain.

Page 218 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2026/27
B-2 The north side of Highland Ave from the Deer Creek Channel to San Benito Ave. The north side of 19th St from San Benito Ave to Palm Dr. The west and east side of Alameda Ave from 19th St to Ring Ave. The east side of Palm Dr from 19th St to Ring Ave.

Ground Cover area: 47,397 square feet
Hardscape area: 26,285 square feet
Increase of 24,847 ground cover due to addition of landscape on the north side of Highland. Original 22,550 square feet changed to 47,397 on February 4, 2009.

B-3 The paseo from Sutter Ct to Deer Creek Channel.

Ground Cover area: 294 square feet
Hardscape area: 400 square feet
B-4 The north side of Banyan St from Deer Creek Channel to 355 feet west of Fredericksburg Ave.

Ground Cover area: 9,200 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,834 square feet
B-5 The north side of Lemon Ave from Semillion Pl to 188 feet west of Terracina Ave.

Ground Cover area: 14,472 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,894 square feet

B-6 The north side of Lemon Ave from Barsac Pl to Semillion Pl.

Ground Cover area: 15,784 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,780 square feet
B-7 The south side of Banyan St from Cabernet Pl to 414 feet east of Cabernet Pl.

Ground Cover area: 18,814 square feet

B-8 The south side of Banyan St from Callaway Pl to Muscat Pl.

Ground Cover area: 10,505 square feet
B-9 The east side of Haven Ave from Banyan St to 240 feet north of Banyan St. The north side of Banyan St from Haven Ave to Merlot Ct.

Ground Cover area: 24,975 square feet
Hardscape area: 1,356 square feet
B-10 The east side of Haven Ave from 400 feet south of Banyan St to Banyan St. The south side of Banyan St from Haven Ave to Callaway Pl.

Ground Cover area: 14,548 square feet
Hardscape area: 6,348 square feet

Page 219 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2026/27
B-11 The south side of Banyan St from Muscat Pl to Cabernet Pl.

Ground Cover area: 33,282 square feet
B-12 The north side of Lemon Ave from Barsac Pl to 135 feet east of Valinda Ave.

Ground Cover area: 13,464 square feet
Hardscape area: 4,098 square feet

B-13 The south side of 19th St from Inyo Pl to 585 feet east of San Benito Ave. The parkways on the east and west side of San Benito Ave from 19th St to San Mateo Pl. The east side of Inyo Pl from 19th St to paseo south of 19th St and the paseo running east from Inyo Pl to Sonora Ave.

Ground Cover area: 20,950 square feet
Hardscape area: 14,192 square feet
B-14 The paseo from San Benito Ave and Sonora Ave to the Deer Creek Channel.

Ground Cover area: 2,000 square feet
Hardscape area: 540 square feet
B-15 The paseo from Stanislaus Pl and La Vine St to the Deer Creek Channel.

Ground Cover area: 1,040 square feet
Hardscape area: 428 square feet
B-16 The paseo from Inyo Pl to Mendocino Pl.

Ground Cover area: 225 square feet
Hardscape area: 184 square feet
B-17 The paseo from Yuba Ct to Deer Creek Channel.

Ground Cover area: 918 square feet
Hardscape area: 420 square feet
B-18 The south side of Wilson Ave from 377 feet west of Canistel Ave to 1032 feet east of Canistel Ave.

Ground Cover area: 6,762 square feet
Hardscape area: 8,454 square feet

B-19 The east side of Haven Ave from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 341 feet south of Victoria St.

Ground Cover area: 6,415 square feet
Hardscape area: 8,865 square feet

Page 220 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2026/27
B-20 The east side of Haven Ave from 341 feet south of Victoria St to Victoria St; the south side of Victoria St from Haven Ave to 237 feet east of Mango St.

Ground Cover area: 16,900 square feet
Hardscape area: 8,767 square feet

B-21 The south side of 19th St from Valinda Ave to Inyo Pl.

Ground Cover area: 3,900 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,700 square feet

B-22 The south side of Lemon Ave south of the sidewalk from 188 feet west of Terracina Ave to 284 feet north of Marbella Dr. The parkway on the south side of Lemon Ave from 188 feet west of Terracina Ave to 517 feet north of Marbella Dr. The turf in the parkway at the end of the cul-de-sac on Sonterra Ct. The parkway on the north side of Lemon Ave from 188 feet west of Terracina Ave to 526 feet south of Terracina Ave. The north side of Lemon Ave north of the sidewalk from 188 feet west of Terracina Ave to 562 feet south of Terracina Ave. The turf in the parkway at the end of the cul-de-sac at Serena Pl.

Ground Cover area: 17,688 square feet
Turf area: 6,390 square feet
Hardscape area: 4,928 square feet
B-23 The parkway on the east side of Lemon Ave from 129 feet south of Marbella Dr to 526 feet south of Terracina Ave. The slope on the east side of Lemon Ave east of the sidewalk from 129 feet south of Marbella Dr to 562 feet south of Terracina Ave. The west side of Lemon Ave west of the sidewalk from 284 feet north of Marbella Dr to 129 feet south of Marbella Dr. The parkway on the west side of Lemon Ave from 517 feet north of Marbella Dr to 129 feet south of Marbella Dr.

Ground Cover area: 22,531 square feet
Hardscape area: 4,468 square feet
11,844 square feet of ground cover was deleted from this site on July 1, 2000.

B-24 The south side of Highland Ave from 327 feet west of Deer Creek Channel to Deer Creek Channel. The paseo from Los Osos Way to Deer Creek Channel.

Ground Cover area: 4,946 square feet
Hardscape area: 2,099 square feet

B-25 The south side of Banyan St from 152 feet west of Cantabria Ave to 930 feet east of Cantabria Ave.

Ground Cover area: 16,693 square feet

Page 221 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2026/27
B-26 The north side of Wilson Ave from 590 feet west of High Meadow Pl to 187 feet east of High Meadow Pl.

Ground Cover area: 4,628 square feet
Hardscape area: 390 square feet

B-27 The east side of Haven Ave from 467 feet north of 19th St to 650 feet north of 19th St.

Ground Cover area: 3,483 square feet
Hardscape area: 6,235 square feet

C-1 The north side of 26th St from Andover Pl to Hermosa Ave. The east side of Hermosa Ave from 26th St to 331 feet north of Concord Dr.

Ground Cover area: 22,227 square feet
Hardscape area: 5,532 square feet

C-2 The entry monument on the northeast and northwest corners of 4th St and Archibald Ave.

Ground Cover area: 6,337 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,998 square feet
Turf replaced with cobblestone on January 15, 2013.

C-3 The south side of Base Line Rd from Ramona Ave to 128 feet east of Cambridge Ave.

Ground Cover area: 17,262 square feet
Hardscape area: 4,865 square feet

C-4 The south side of Base Line Rd from 440 feet west of Ramona Ave to Ramona Ave.

Ground Cover area: 6,198 square feet
Hardscape area: 2,200 square feet

C-5 The south side of Base Line Rd from 340 feet west of Center Ave to 103 feet east of Center Ave.

Ground Cover area: 8,850 square feet
Hardscape area: 2,215 square feet

C-6 The south side of Base Line Rd from Ivy Ln to 105 feet west of Marine Ave.

Ground Cover area: 8,080 square feet
Hardscape area: 2,475 square feet

C-7 The parkway on the north side of Church St from 142 feet east of Teak Way to 230 feet west of Teak Way.

Ground Cover area: 1,813 square feet
Hardscape area: 1,650 square feet

Page 222 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2026/27
C-8 The west side of Hermosa Ave from 524 feet north of Palo Alto St to 142 feet south of Palo Alto St.

Ground Cover area: 2,650 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,996 square feet

C-9 The parkway on the west side of Hermosa Ave from 163 feet north of Ironwood St to 145 feet south of Ironwood St.

Ground Cover area: 1,500 square feet
Hardscape area: 1,848 square feet

C-10 The entry monument parkway on the south side of Base Line Rd from the western city limit to Alta Cuesta Dr.

Ground Cover area: 9,756 square feet
Hardscape area: 4,380 square feet

C-11 The parkway on the east side of Beryl St from Alder St to 135 feet north of Culpepper St.

Ground Cover area: 3,400 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,600 square feet

C-12 The parkway on the east side of Hellman Ave from Tryon St to 665 feet north of Tryon St.

Ground Cover area: 8,280 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet
C-13 The parkway on the west side of Hellman Ave from 500 feet north of Church St to Church St.

Ground Cover area: 2,416 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,000 square feet
C-14 The east side of Archibald Ave from 196 feet north of Palo Alto St to 530 feet north of Palo Alto St.

Ground Cover area: 4,262 square feet
Hardscape area: 1,374 square feet
C-15 The north side of San Bernardino Rd from Summerlin Pl to 225 feet west of Summerlin Pl.

Ground Cover area: 1,660 square feet
Hardscape area: 710 square feet

Page 223 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2026/27
C-16 The south side of Base Line Rd from 286 feet west of Hermosa Ave to Hermosa Ave.

The raised planter on the southwest corner of Base Line Rd and Hermosa Ave.

Ground Cover area: 4,190 square feet
Hardscape area: 2,320 square feet
C-17 The east side of Hellman Ave from 775 feet south of 6th St to 6th St. The south side of 6th St from Hellman Ave to Golden Oak Rd. The west side of Golden Oak Rd from 6th St to Foxbrook Dr.

Ground Cover area: 9,058 square feet
Hardscape area: 6,387 square feet

C-18 The tot lot on the SWC of Andover Pl and Bedford Dr.

Ground Cover area: 1,506 square feet
Turf area: 1,070 square feet
Hardscape area: 640 square feet
Site designation changed from I-1-5 to C-18 on July 10, 2024

D-1 The east side of Rochester Ave from Church St to Base Line Rd.

Ground Cover area: 27,920 square feet
Hardscape area: 17,301 square feet

D-2 The east side of Rochester Ave from 146 feet south of Chervil St to Church St.

Ground Cover area: 21,858 square feet
Hardscape area: 13,263 square feet

D-3 The south side of Base Line Rd from Rochester Ave to 600 feet east of Rochester Ave.

Ground Cover area: 2,180 square feet
Hardscape area: 4,121 square feet

D-4 The nor th and south sides of Church St from Rochester Ave to 150 feet east of Hyssop Dr.

Ground Cover area: 6,340 square feet
Hardscape area: 8,887 square feet

D-5 The landscape along the Edison corridor from Arrow Rt. To Foothill Blvd.

Ground Cover area: 23,392 square feet

H-9 The Haven Ave median from the 210 freeway to Alta Loma Dr.

Ground Cover area: 2,207 square feet

H-10 The Haven Ave median from entrance of Haven Village to Amber Ln.

Ground Cover area: 6,968 square feet

Page 224 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 20 Fiscal Year 2026/27
Converted 5,131 square feet of turf to ground cover effective April 1, 2013. Area listed is the 50% maintained by LMD 1. An equal amount is maintained by General Fund as of March 25, 2013

H-11 The Haven Ave median from Amber Ln to Olive Way.

Ground Cover area: 5,026 square feet
Converted 3,475 square feet of turf to ground cover effective April 1, 2013. Area listed is the 50% maintained by LMD 1. An equal amount is maintained by General Fund as of March 25, 2013

H-12 The Haven Ave median from Olive Way to 712 feet north of Wilson Ave.

Ground Cover area: 6,734 square feet
Converted 3,933 square feet of turf to ground cover effective April 1, 2013. Area listed is the 50% maintained by LMD 1. An equal amount is maintained by General Fund as of March 25, 2013

H-13 The Haven Ave median from 19th St to the 210 freeway.

Ground Cover area: 12,514 square feet

FH-18 The Foothill Blvd median from East Ave to 453 feet east of Cornwall Ct.

Ground Cover area: 5,450 square feet

Parks, ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company.

Map of Improvements

The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds.

Page 225 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 21 Fiscal Year 2026/27

Page 226 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 22 Fiscal Year 2026/27

ESTIMATE OF COSTS
The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year.

District Budget
Fiscal Year
2026/27 Budget
Expenditures
Personnel Services:

Regular Salaries 42,440
Part-time Salaries 13,600
Fringe Benefits 25,680
Subtotal - Personnel 81,720
Operations and Maintenance:

Operations and Maintenance:

General Operations 86,100
Building and Equipment Rental 6,500
Repairs and Maintenance Equipment 3,000
Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 2,150
Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 97,750
Contract Services:

Contract Services General 460,610
Contract Services Facilities 8,770
Contract Services Landscape and Parks 315,560
Tree Maintenance 156,340
Subtotal - Contract Services 941,280
Utilities:

Water Utilities 600
Electric Utilities 386,350
Subtotal - Utilities 427,520
Assessment Administration 43,290
Admin./General Overhead 88,890
Other Expenses 660
Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 1,599,390
Transfer Out:

Transfer Out - LMD #1 Capital Reserve Fund 90,000
Total Expenditures Budget 1,771,110

Page 227 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 23 Fiscal Year 2026/27
Fiscal Year
2026/27 Budget
Revenues
Taxes:

Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 1,286,640$ A
nticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 12,220
Subtotal - Taxes 1,298,860
Other Revenues:

Other Rental/Lease Income 31,670
Park Maintenance Fees 2,050
Sports Field User Group Rentals 20,000
Other Revenue 100
Subtotal - Other Revenues: 53,820
Transfer In:

Transfer In - General Fund 71,330
Transfer In - LMD #1 Operating Fund 90,000
Transfer In - CFD Empire Lakes 178,450
Subtotal - Transfer In: 339,780
Total Revenues Budget 1,692,460
Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance (78,650)$
Total Gross Estimated Assessments 1,278,285.72$
Total District EBU Count 13,862.18
Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2026/27 92.21$
Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2026/27 92.21$

The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit ( EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218.

It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. Be ginning with Fiscal Year 2016/17 the City will maintain a Capital Reserve Fund to be used for deferred maintenance and pending capital projects. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows:

Page 228 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 24 Fiscal Year 2026/27
Operating Capital Total
Reserve Reserve Reserve
Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2026 $1,590,668 $547,655 2,138,323$ Contribution to/(Use of) Reserve - Fiscal Year 2026/27 (172,010) 93,360 (78,650) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2027 $1,418,658 $641,015 2,059,673$

Definitions of Budget Items
The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget:

Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full -time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees.

Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District.

Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements.

Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services , as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District.

Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost of all particular departments and staff of the City, as well as consultants, for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings.

General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also inclu des an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational D istrict within the City's administrative structure.

Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements.

Page 229 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 25 Fiscal Year 2026/27
Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking).

METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
Overview
Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements.

The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements.

Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states:

The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.

The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California].

Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement."

Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways.

The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by

Page 230 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 26 Fiscal Year 2026/27
the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed.

General Benefit
Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed.

In this District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas, Parks - Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park, Hermosa Park, and the undeveloped Don Tiburcio Tapia Park and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the General City and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parc els within the District . The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the General City which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City’s system of arterial streets. City residents a nd traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvem ents. Only parcels which are within the District and proximate to the improvements and within the District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District.

Based upon this, it has been determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit.

Special Benefit
The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District and, as such, confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by:

• improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and

Page 231 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 27 Fiscal Year 2026/27
• ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District.

The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District, only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance.

Method of Assessment Spread
Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements.

Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements is identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements.

When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined; however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since Fiscal Year 1996/97. Further, no pa rcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed.

To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment.

A single-family home equals one EBU. Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single -family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land- use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment.

Page 232 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 28 Fiscal Year 2026/27
Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units

Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier
Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel
Multi-Family Residential 0.50 Unit
Non-Residential 2.00 Acre

The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment.

The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2026/27 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District:

Maximum
Allowable
Assessment
Rate per EBU
Actual
Assessment
Rate per EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs
Single Family Residential $92.21 $92.21 8,435.00 8,435.00 Multi-Fa
mily Residential 92.21 92.21 10,819.00 5,409.50
Non-Residential 92.21 92.21 8.84 17.68

The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report.

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report.

Page 233 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 29 Fiscal Year 2026/27

Page 234 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 30 Fiscal Year 2026/27

ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS
Assessment Roll
The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 202 6/27 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino.

The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2026/27 actual assessments for the District:

Property Type (County Use Code)
Actual
Assessment
Rate Per EBU
Total Units/
Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment
Single-family Residential $92.21 8,435.00 8,435.00 $ 777,791.35 Multi-family Residential 92.21 10,819.00 5,409.50 $ 498,864.09 Non-Residential 92.21 8.84 17.68 1 ,630.28
Total 19,262.84 13,862.18 $1,278,285.72

A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office.

Annexations
The following annexations are effective for Fiscal Year 2026/27:

APN
Annexation
Date Project
Total Units
/ Acr e s Total EBUs T ype
0207-761-01,-02,-03
0207-771-01,-02,-03 05/01/24 SUBTTM16605 175.00 87.50 Multi-Family Property 0209-102-25-0000 06/04/25 DRC2023-00418 1.00 1.00 Single-Family Property 0209-102-30-0000 06/04/25 DRC2023-00322 1.00 1.00 Single-Family Property 0202-082-35-0000 11/19/25 BPR2025-00023 1.00 1.00 Single-Family Property LMD 1

Page 235 ends

ATTACHMENT 5
Preliminary Annual Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2026/27
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
(Victoria Neighborhood Parks)

Page 236 ends

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
(Victoria Neighborhood Parks)
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Phone: 909.477.2700
Fax: 909.477.2845

CITY COUNCIL
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem
Ryan A. Hutchison, Council Member
Kristine D. Scott, Council Member
Ashley N. Stickler, Council Member

Page 237 ends

TABLE OF CONTENTS
ENGINEER’S LETTER 1
INTRODUCTION 4
Reason for Assessment 4
Process for Annual Assessment 4
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5
Description of the Boundaries of the District 5
Description of Improvements and Services 5
Map of Improvements 23
ESTIMATE OF COSTS 25
District Budget 25
Definitions of Budget Items 27
BENEFITS FROM IMPROVEMENTS AND QUANTIFICATION 28
Benefits from Improvements 28
Quantification of Benefit 30
Sidewalks and Community Trails 31
Street Landscaping 33
Neighborhood Parks 38
Collective General Benefit 40
METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 40
Overview 40
Apportioning of Special Benefit 41
Rate per Benefit Unit 48
Method of Assessment Spread 48
Applying the Method of Assessment Spread 48

Page 238 ends

Proposed Maximum Assessment Rates 51
Cost of Living Inflator 51
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 52
ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 54
Assessment Roll 54
Annexations 54

Page 239 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2026/27
ENGINEER’S LETTER
WHEREAS, on June 3, 2026, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the “City”), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the “1972 Act”) adopted its Resolution No. 2026-XXX, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Neighborhood Parks) (hereafter, referred to as the “District”); and
WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026/27 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act.

The Annual Engineer’s Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment.

Page 240 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2026/27
Fiscal Year
2026/27 Budget
Expenditures
Personnel Services 1,171,890$
Operations and Maintenance 3,931,070
Capital Expenditures 1,219,800
Total Expenditures Budget 6,322,760
Revenues
Taxes:

Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 4,752,620 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 27,410
Subtotal - Taxes 4,780,030
Other Revenues 960
Transfer In 317,450
Total Revenues Budget 5,098,440
Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance (1,224,320)$
Total District EBU Count 84,518.45
Actual Assessment per EBU 56.23$
Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU 57.50$

Page 241 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2026/27
In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act:

2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation:
a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements;
b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and
c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed.

Page 242 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2026/27

INTRODUCTION
Reason for Assessment
Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer’s Report will generate the revenue necessary to:

Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer’s Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District.

Process for Annual Assessment
The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer’s Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District.

The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which:
Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein.
Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements.
Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District.
Refers to the Engineer’s Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District.
Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment.
States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year.

Page 243 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2026/27
hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest.

During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment.

The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment.

If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment.

PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District.

Description of the Boundaries of the District
The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area located south of the 210 Freeway, west of Etiwanda Ave, southwest of the I-15 Freeway, and east of Haven Ave, also known as the Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District, and are more particularly in the diagram of the District included herein.

Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report.

Description of Improvements and Services
The improvements located in and serviced and maintained by the District generally include: the landscaping and associated landscape lighting and irrigation systems installed along the roadways, medians, and community trails; sidewalks; and six neighborhood parks that are of direct and special benefit to the parcels within the District. These improvements are located within the public right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris/graffiti, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements, including the

Page 244 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2026/27
parks and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of the improvement or facility; grading and replacement of trail surfacing; trail fence repair and replacement; and irrigation systems control, adjustment, repair and replacement. Servicing means the furnishing of water for the irrigation of landscaping, the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscaping or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include materials, vehicles, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City’s intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows:

Parks: Ellena Park, Kenyon Park, Victoria Arbors Park, Victoria Groves Park, Vintage Park, and Windrows Park
Site # Descriptive Location
2-1 The west side of Arbor Ln from the traffic circle to Church St. The Arbor Ln median from Church St to the traffic circle. The east side of Arbor Ln from Long Meadow Dr to Church St. The paseo from the west side of Arbor Ln to Day Creek Blvd. The paseo from the west side of Arbor Ln to Saintsbury Pl. The north side of Winery Dr from Arbor Ln to 214 feet west of Arbor Ln. The south side of Long Meadow Dr from Freestone Ct to Duck Creek Pl.

Ground Cover area: 93,639 square feet
Hardscape area: 59,041 square feet
2-2 The northwest corner of Day Creek Blvd and Church St. The north side of Church St from Day Creek Blvd to 1,152 feet west of Hess Pl. The paseo from the north side of Church St to Dry Creek Dr. The paseo from the north side of Church St to Pineridge Pl. The west side of Hess Pl from the north side of Church St to Dry Creek Dr. The south side of Church St from 145 feet east of Hyssop Dr to 896 feet east of Hyssop Dr.

Ground Cover area: 24,018 square feet
Hardscape area: 26,617 square feet
2-3 The west side of Day Creek Blvd from 250 feet north of Appellation Dr to Church St.

The east side of Day Creek Blvd from Church St to Madrigal Pl. The Day Creek Blvd median from Church St to Base Line Rd. The south side of Madrigal Pl from Day Creek Blvd to Round Hill Pl.

Ground Cover area: 35,420 square feet
Hardscape area: 42,671 square feet

Page 245 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2026/27
2-4 Victoria Park Ln from Base Line Rd to the east entrance of Victoria Arbor Park. The southwest corner of Victoria Park Ln and Base Line Rd. The southeast corner of Victoria Park Ln to 445 feet east of Victoria Park Ln.

Ground Cover area: 36,482 square feet
Turf area: 3,874 square feet
Hardscape area: 32,927 square feet
2-5 The east and west side of Victoria Park Ln and the medians from Mosaic Dr to Church St.

Ground Cover area: 56,358 square feet
Hardscape area: 20,390 square feet
2-6 The north side of Church St from Arbor Ln to Day Creek Blvd. The northwest corner of Church St and Arbor Ln. The paseo from the north side of Church St to Wilson Creek Dr.

Ground Cover area: 21,616 square feet
Hardscape area: 15,159 square feet
2-7 The north side of Church St from Victoria Park Ln to Arbor Ln. The northwest corner of Victoria Park Ln and Church St. The paseo from the north side of Church St to Elk Cove Ct. The paseo from the north side of Church St to Freestone Ct. The northeast corner of Arbor Ln and Church St.

Ground Cover area: 16,609 square feet
Hardscape area: 13,730 square feet
2-8 The paseo from the west side of Etiwanda Ave to Silver Rose Ct. The north side of Church St from Etiwanda Ave to Victoria Park Ln. The east side of Iron Horse Pl from Church St to Wild Horse Pl. The paseo from the north side of Church St to Cloudy Bay Ct. The medians from Iron Horse Pl to Etiwanda Ave.

Ground Cover area: 35,122 square feet
Hardscape area: 28,473 square feet
863 square feet of ground cover added due to the addition of the Silver Rose paseo on February 14, 2007. The previous square footage was 34,259. 2-9 The landscaped slope behind existing landscape of site 2-5 on the west side of Victoria Park Ln from 475 feet north of Long Meadow Dr to Long Meadow Dr. The landscape slope and curb adjacent parkway from Victoria Park Ln to 685 feet west of Victoria Park Ln.

Ground Cover area: 26,213 square feet
Hardscape area: 5,617 square feet

Page 246 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2026/27
VW-1 Base Line Rd median from Victoria Park Ln to 830 feet west of Victoria Park Ln.

Ground Cover area: 4,514 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,474 square feet
VW-2 The north side of Base Line Rd 300 feet east and 200 feet west of Swanson Pl. The east and west sides of Swanson Pl from Base Line Rd to Province St. The paseo from the intersection of Swanson Pl and Province St to Atwood St with outlet to Dunmore Pl. The paseo from Atwood St to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The north side of Saratoga St from Powell Pl to Dunmore Pl. The paseo from Saratoga St to Etiwanda Ave. The south side of Atwood St from Victoria Park Ln to Travis Pl. The north side of Atwood St from Walcott Pl to Victoria Park Ln.

Ground Cover area: 19,253 square feet
Turf area: 73,931 square feet
Hardscape area: 22,615 square feet
500 square feet of ground cover added on May 29, 2025.

VW-3 The Victoria Park Ln median and the west and east side parkways from Base Line Rd to the entrance to Victoria Village.

Ground Cover area: 27,090 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,214 square feet
VW-4 The Victoria Park Ln median and the west and east side parkways from Victoria Village entrance to Atwood St.

Ground Cover area: 40,937 square feet
Hardscape area: 6,428 square feet
VW-5 The Victoria Park Ln median and the west side and east side parkways from Atwood St to the Southern Pacific Railroad.

Ground Cover area: 49,513 square feet
Hardscape area: 5,467 square feet
VW-6 The paseo running north from 12732 Farrington St to the Southern Pacific Railroad.

Hardscape area: 964 square feet
285 square feet of ground cover converted to cobblestone on June 1, 2019.

VW-7 The paseo running north from 12840 Farrington St to the Southern Pacific Railroad.

Hardscape area: 818 square feet
266 square feet of ground cover converted to cobblestone on June 1, 2019.

Page 247 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2026/27
VW-8 The Victoria Park Ln median and the west side parkway from the Southern Pacific Railroad to South Victoria Windrows Loop. The Victoria Park Ln east side parkway from the Southern Pacific Railroad to Zinnia Ct.

Ground Cover area: 40,548 square feet
Hardscape area: 6,150 square feet
VW-9 The Victoria Park Ln east side parkway from Barberry St to North Victoria Windrows Loop at Windrows Park.

Ground Cover area:

Turf area:
40,004 square feet
11,779 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,720 square feet
VW-10 The west side of Victoria Park Ln from South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct.

The Victoria Park Ln median from Zinnia Ct to Dahlia Ct. The east side of Victoria Park Ln from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Windrows Park to Dahlia Ct.

Ground Cover area: 50,620 square feet
Turf area: 11,878 square feet
Hardscape area: 11,400 square feet
Reduction of 2,250 square feet of ground cover. Area between Windrows Park and outer trail fence has been mulchscape and turned over to the Parks Department on April 15, 2010.

VW-11 The east side parkway on South Victoria Windrows Loop from Silktassel Dr to Victoria Park Ln. The parkway on the south side of Victoria Park Ln from the intersection of South Victoria Windrows Loop and North Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct. The Victoria Park Ln median from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct. The parkway on the north side of Victoria Windrows Loop from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct.

Ground Cover area: 27,053 square feet
Turf area: 20,216 square feet
Hardscape area: 6,988 square feet
VW-12 The Victoria Park Ln median from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. The parkway on the north side of Victoria Park Ln from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. The parkway on the west side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Silverberry St to Victoria Park Ln. The parkway on the south side of Silverberry St from 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd to North Victoria Windrows Loop.

Ground Cover area: 166,249 square feet
Turf area: 21,603 square feet
Hardscape area: 12,868 square feet

Page 248 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2026/27
VW-13 The parkway on the south side of Victoria Park Ln from 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd to South Victoria Windrows Loop. The west side of South Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Ln to Snapdragon St.

Ground Cover area: 20,068 square feet
Turf area: 16,476 square feet
Hardscape area: 7,200 square feet
VW-14 The parkway on the west side of South Victoria Windrows Loop from Snapdragon St to Victoria Park Ln. The parkway on the north and south side of Sugar Gum St from South Victoria Windrows Loop to 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. The parkways on the east and west sides of Basswood Pl from Sugar Gum St to Blazing Star Ct. The parkway on the north side of South Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Ln to Silktassel Dr.

Ground Cover area: 21,466 square feet
Turf area: 10,335 square feet
Hardscape area: 27,560 square feet
VW-15 The parkway on the north side of Bougainvillea Way from Peach Pl to North Victoria Windrows Loop. The parkway on the east side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Bougainvillea Way to Citrus Pl. The parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Locus Ave and following that curb line to Silverberry St. The parkway on the north side of Silverberry St from North Victoria Windrows Loop 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. The paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Silverberry St to Nasturtium Dr. The paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Locus Ave to Pistache St and continuing to Bougainvillea Way.

Ground Cover area: 45,929 square feet
Turf area: 12,207 square feet
Hardscape area: 23,630 square feet
VW-16 The south side of Highland Ave from 455 feet east of Day Creek Blvd to 534 feet east of Locus Ave. The east and west side of Locus Ave from Highland Ave to North Victoria Windrows Loop. The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Citrus Pl east to Bougainvillea Way. The parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Twinspur Pl to Locus Ave.

Ground Cover area: 26,577 square feet
Turf area: 23,922 square feet
Hardscape area: 19,203 square feet
VW-17 This site was modified and added to VW-16 on January 5, 1999.

Page 249 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2026/27
VW-18 The south side of Highland Ave from 12583 Highland Ave to Rockrose Ave.

Ground Cover area: 2,800 square feet
Turf area: 8,515 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet
VW-19 The north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rosemary Ct to Rockrose Ave.

The east side of Rockrose Ave from North Victoria Windrows Loop to Highland Ave.

The south side of Highland Ave from Rockrose Ave to Etiwanda Ave. The horse trail from Highland Ave and Etiwanda Ave to the Fire Station.

Ground Cover area: 21,027 square feet
Turf area: 32,266 square feet
Hardscape area: 11,298 square feet
VW-20 The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Ln to Plum Way. The parkway on the west side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Plum Way to Rosemary Ct. The paseo from Tipu Pl east to the open field.

Note: The area in front of Windrows Park is watered by the VW-20 water meter, but it is maintained by City crews.

Ground Cover area: 2,110 square feet
Turf area: 16,411 square feet
Hardscape area: 9,132 square feet
VW-21 The east side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rosemary Ct to the trail south of Kalmia St. The trail and paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop south of Kalmia St to Etiwanda Ave and north to the Fire Station. The south side of Basil St from North Victoria Windrows Loop to Santolina Pl.

Ground Cover area: 49,187 square feet
Turf area: 36,461 square feet
Hardscape area: 19,600 square feet
Mulchscape: 21,071 square feet
Turf removed from Basil St. was converted to mulchscape on April 1, 2019.

VW-22 The paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Rockrose Ave to the northeast corner of Windrows Park and from that corner to Plum Way.

Ground Cover area: 13,689 square feet
Turf area: 19,953 square feet
Hardscape area: 9,489 square feet

Page 250 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2026/27
VW-23 The west side of Rockrose Ave from Highland Ave to North Victoria Windrows Loop.

The parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rockrose Ave to Twinspur Pl. The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Bougainvillea Way to Rosemary Ct.

Ground Cover area: 18,299 square feet
Turf area: 3,452 square feet
Hardscape area: 10,352 square feet
VW-24 The Metropolitan Water District easement from Jasmine Ct and Ironbark Dr to Sweetgum Dr.

Ground Cover area: 475 square feet
Hardscape area: 4,730 square feet
VW-25 The north side of Base Line Rd from 384 feet west of Wanona Pl to Etiwanda Ave.

The west side of Etiwanda Ave from Base Line Rd to Craig Dr. The Base Line Rd median from Swanson Pl to Etiwanda Ave.

Ground Cover area: 20,934 square feet
Turf area: 3,079 square feet
Hardscape area: 12,799 square feet
VW-26 The paseo from Grape Pl to 630 feet west of Grape Pl.

Ground Cover area: 7,021 square feet
Hardscape area: 8,548 square feet
VW-27 The south side of Base Line Rd from 251 feet west of Swanson Pl to Etiwanda Ave.

The Base Line Rd median from Victoria Park Ln to Swanson Pl.

Ground Cover area: 18,816 square feet
Hardscape area: 17,233 square feet
This site had 2,667 feet of ground cover added due to addition of Base Line median June 8, 2005.

VG-1 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Highland Ave from the Deer Creek Channel to Fairmont Way. The turf and ground cover from Highland Ave on the west side of Fairmont Way to Victoria Park Ln. The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Ln south of the horse trail from 475 feet east of Milliken Ave to Fairmont Way. The turf on the north side of Victoria Park Ln from 275 feet east of Milliken Ave to Fairmont Way. The turf in the parkway on the east side of Fairmont Way from Victoria Park Ln to Highland Ave.

Ground Cover area: 21,573 square feet
Turf area: 47,604 square feet
Hardscape area: 17,300 square feet

Page 251 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2026/27
VG-2 The turf on the east side of York Pl from Delaware St to Fairmont Way. The ground cover on the south side of Fairmont Way from York Pl and continuing on that curb line to Victoria Park Ln. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Ln west of Milliken Ave from Fairmont Way to Milliken Ave. The parkway on the west side of Milliken Ave from Victoria Park Ln to Fairmont Way. The Milliken Ave median from Fairmont Way to Victoria Park Ln. The turf on the north side of Victoria Park Ln from 273 feet west of Milliken Ave to Milliken Ave. The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Ln south of the horse trail from 468 feet west of Milliken Ave to Milliken Ave.

Ground Cover area: 53,416 square feet
Turf area: 49,587 square feet
Hardscape area: 20,173 square feet
VG-3 The turf and ground cover north of the sidewalk on the north side of Fairmont Way from Nova Ct continuing on that curb line to York Pl and the turf south of the sidewalk on the north side of Fairmont Way from Armstrong Pl continuing on that curb line to York Pl. The ground cover on the west side of York Pl from Fairmont Way to Delaware St and the ground cover on the east side of York Pl. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Fairmont Way from Emerson St continuing along that curb line to Armstrong Pl. The turf and ground cover on the east and west sides of Biola Pl.

Ground Cover area: 57,189 square feet
Turf area: 38,343 square feet
Hardscape area: 26,848 square feet
VG-4 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Fairmont Way from Armstrong Pl to Milliken Ave. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Milliken Ave from Fairmont Way to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The Milliken Ave median from Fairmont Way to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The ground cover on the north side of the Southern Pacific Railroad from Deer Creek Channel to Rochester Ave including the paseo to Baylor St. The ground cover on the north side of Fairmont Way from Milliken Ave to Nova Ct. The turf on the north side of Fairmont Way from Milliken Ave to Armstrong Pl.

Ground Cover area: 202,163 square feet
Turf area: 19,751 square feet
Hardscape area: 12,278 square feet
VG-5 The paseo from Biola Pl to Amarillo St to Delaware St at York Pl.

Ground Cover area: 12,448 square feet
Turf area: 44,896 square feet
Hardscape area: 7,992 square feet

Page 252 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2026/27
VG-6 The paseo beginning at the northeast corner of Victoria Groves Park and Fairmont Way and extending to the Deer Creek Channel.

Ground Cover area: 73,442 square feet
Turf area: 74,778 square feet
Hardscape area: 16,629 square feet
VG-7 The paseo that begins on the south side of Donnelly St at Fairmont Way and continues to the Deer Creek Channel including the southward extension on the west side of Albright Pl from Donnelly St to Pacific and the paseo from Pacific to Charleston St.

Ground Cover area: 43,427 square feet
Turf area: 51,765 square feet
Hardscape area: 15,806 square feet
VG-8 The ground cover on the west side of Milliken Ave from 566 feet north of Victoria Park Ln to Victoria Park Ln. The ground cover and turf north of the horse trail on Victoria Park Ln from Milliken Ave to Fairmont Way. The ground cover on the east side of Fairmont Way from Victoria Park Ln to 156 feet north of Victoria Park Ln.

Ground Cover area: 21,614 square feet
Turf area: 8,614 square feet
Hardscape area: 8,281 square feet
VG-9 The ground cover on the east side of Fairmont Way from 156 feet north of Victoria Park Ln to Kenyon Way. The ground cover on the south side of Kenyon Way from Fairmont Way to 197 feet east of Fairmont Way. The turf on the south side of Kenyon Way from Fairmont Way to 316 feet east of Fairmont Way. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Baltimore Dr from Fairmont Way to Baltimore Ct.

The turf and ground cover on the north side of Baltimore Dr from Fairmont Way to Vanderbilt Pl. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Vanderbilt Pl from Baltimore Dr to Brown Dr. The paseo from Vanderbilt Pl and Brown Dr to Kenyon Way.

Ground Cover area: 48,481 square feet
Turf area: 11,357 square feet
Hardscape area: 13,542 square feet

Page 253 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2026/27
VG-10 The ground cover on the south side of Kenyon Way from 197 feet east of Fairmont Way to Milliken Ave. The turf on the south side of Kenyon Way from 316 feet east of Fairmont Way to Milliken Ave. The ground cover on the west side of Milliken Ave from Kenyon Way to 566 feet north of Victoria Park Ln. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Capitol Pl from Brown Dr to Bethany Dr. The paseo from Capitol Pl and Brown Dr to Kenyon Way.

Ground cover area: 34,241 square feet
Turf area: 11,031 square feet
Hardscape area: 5,320 square feet
VG-11 The east and west side parkways and median of Milliken Ave from Base Line Rd to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The north side of Base Line Rd from 542 feet east of Milliken Ave to Milliken Ave.

Ground Cover area: 31,367 square feet
Turf area: 17,264 square feet
Hardscape area: 25,524 square feet
VG-12 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Fairmont Way from the southeast corner of Milliken Ave and Fairmont Way along the curb line to Victoria Park Ln. The turf and ground over on the west side of Fairmont Way from the southwest corner of Victoria Park Ln and Fairmont Way (located east of Milliken Ave) and continuing along the curb line to Milliken Ave. The turf on the east side of Milliken Ave from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 730 feet south of Victoria Park Ln. The ground cover on the east side of Milliken Ave from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 766 feet south of Victoria Park Ln.

Ground Cover area: 53,068 square feet
Turf area: 36,431 square feet
Hardscape area: 27,004 square feet
VG-13 The paseos from Victoria Park Ln to Verona Dr, Verona Dr to Napoli Dr, and Genova Rd to Tivoli Pl.

Ground Cover area: 17,993 square feet
Turf area: 16,344 square feet
Hardscape area: 8,376 square feet

Page 254 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2026/27
VG-14 The Base Line Rd median from Milliken Ave to Ellena East. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Base Line Rd from Ellena East to Ellena West. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena West from Base Line Rd and following the curb line to Kenyon Way. The north side of Ellena West from Kenyon Way to Casoli Pl. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Casoli Pl from Ellena West to Candela Dr. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Crema Pl from Ellena West to Candela Dr.

Ground Cover area: 89,456 square feet
Turf area: 62,999 square feet
Hardscape area: 44,826 square feet
VG-15 The turf and ground cover on the west side of Rochester Ave from the Southern Pacific Railroad to Base Line Rd. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Base Line Rd from Rochester Ave to Ellena East. The Base Line Rd Median from Rochester Ave to Ellena East. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena East from Base Line Rd and continuing along that curb line to 275 feet north of Berra Rd. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Berra Rd from Ellena East to Comiso Way.

Ground Cover area: 58,588 square feet
Turf area: 57,306 square feet
Hardscape area: 36,014 square feet
VG-16 The paseo from Base Line Rd to Ellena West with entrances to Amelia Dr and Pavola Dr.

Ground Cover area: 9,661 square feet
Turf area: 11,529 square feet
Hardscape area: 5,804 square feet
VG-17 The paseo from Fairmont Way to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The paseo from Fabriano Pl to Martano Pl.

Ground Cover area: 35,351 square feet
Turf area: 40,291 square feet
Hardscape area: 16,394 square feet
VG-18 The paseo from Rapallo Dr to Gandino Dr and south to the Southern Pacific Railroad.

Ground Cover area: 4,281 square feet
Hardscape area: 1,308 square feet
VG-19 The paseo from Tolentino Dr to Pizolli Pl and to Tolentino Dr.

Ground Cover area: 12,555 square feet
Turf area: 17,856 square feet
Hardscape area: 7,380 square feet

Page 255 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2026/27
VG-20 The turf on the east side of Milliken Ave from 730 feet south of Victoria Park Ln to Victoria Park Ln. The ground cover on the east side of Milliken Ave from 766 feet south of Victoria Park Ln to Victoria Park Ln. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Ln from the southeast corner at Milliken Ave heading east to Fairmont Way. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Ln from Parma Pl to the northeast corner of Milliken Ave and Victoria Park Ln. The ground cover on the west side of Parma Pl from Victoria Park Ln to Lomello Way. The Victoria Park Ln median from Milliken Ave to Pandino Ct. The Milliken Ave median from Victoria Park Ln to 440 feet south of Kenyon Way. The parkway on the west side of Milliken Ave from 420 feet south of Kenyon Way to Victoria Park Ln.

Ground Cover area: 96,750 square feet
Turf area: 77,461 square feet
Hardscape area: 22,177 square feet
VG-21 The ground cover on the east side of Parma Pl from Victoria Park Ln to Lomello Way.

The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Ln from Parma Pl to 653 feet east of Kenyon Way. The turf on the north side of Victoria Park Ln from Parma Pl to 547 feet east of Kenyon Way. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Ln from Fairmont Way to 422 feet east of Kenyon Way. The turf and ground cover on the east and west sides of Kenyon Way from Victoria Park Ln to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The paseo from Kenyon Way to Rapallo Dr. The paseo from Kenyon Way to Bari Dr. The Victoria Park Ln median from Pandino Ct to Portofino Dr.

Ground Cover area: 85,865 square feet
Turf area: 41,994 square feet
Hardscape area: 34,478 square feet
VG-22 The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Ln from 653 feet east of Kenyon Way to Rochester Ave. The turf on the north side of Victoria Park Ln from 547 feet east of Kenyon Way to Rochester Ave. The Victoria Park Ln median from Portofino Dr to Rochester Ave. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Ln north of the sidewalk from Kenyon Way to the east side of Vintage Park. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Ln from the east side of Vintage Park to Rochester Ave. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Rochester Ave from Victoria Park Ln to the Southern Pacific Railroad.

Ground Cover area: 115,144 square feet
Turf area: 57,927 square feet
Hardscape area: 20,863 square feet

Page 256 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2026/27
VG-23 The turf and ground cover on the east side of Kenyon Way from Victoria Park Ln to 409 feet west of Grimaldi Rd. The ground cover on the south side of Portofino Dr from Kenyon Way to Bergano Pl. The turf and ground cover on the north and south side of Lark Dr from Kenyon Way to the west property line of Rancho Cucamonga High School. The ground cover on the east and west side of Matera Pl from Lark Dr to Pescara Rd. The ground cover on the north and south side of Grimaldi Rd from Kenyon Way to Brindisi Ct. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Kenyon Way from Lark Dr to Victoria Park Ln. The ground cover on the north and south side of Marcello Way from Kenyon Way to Landriano Pl. The paseo from southwest corner of Kenyon Park to Kenyon Way.

Ground Cover area: 63,733 square feet
Turf area: 82,565 square feet
Hardscape area: 39,297 square feet
VG-24 The north side of Kenyon Way from Autumn Glen Ct to Woodruff Pl. The east side of Woodruff Pl from Kenyon Way to 403 feet north of Kenyon Way.

Ground Cover area: 8,447 square feet
Turf area: 5,320 square feet
Hardscape area: 5,622 square feet
VG-25 The paseo west of Torino Rd from Kenyon Way to Highland Ave. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Highland Ave from the northwest corner of Tract 13440 to the east end of Tract 13440.

Ground Cover area: 40,800 square feet
Turf area: 24,134 square feet
Hardscape area: 14,353 square feet
VG-26 The paseo from Brindisi Ct to Messina Pl. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Brindisi Ct to the end of the cul-de-sac. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Messina Pl from the paseo to Treviso Way.

Ground Cover area: 18,905 square feet
Hardscape area: 4,756 square feet
VG-27 The Milliken Ave median from 440 feet south of Kenyon Way to Highland Ave. The parkway on the west side of Milliken Ave from 420 feet south of Kenyon Way.

Ground Cover area: 4,030 square feet
Turf area: 3,006 square feet
Hardscape area: 4,222 square feet
VG-28 The east side of Rochester Ave from Victoria Park Ln to Highland Ave.

Ground Cover area: 60,902 square feet
Hardscape area: 5,593 square feet

Page 257 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2026/27
VG-29 The north side of Kenyon Way from Milliken Ave to Fairmont Way. The groundcover on the east side of Fairmont Way, east of the sidewalk, from Kenyon Way to the 210 freeway.

Ground Cover area: 20,178 square feet
Turf area: 16,877 square feet
Hardscape area: 5,736 square feet
VG-30 The south side of Tresenda Dr from Santo Pl to Sappada Pl. The paseo from Sappada Pl to Carano Pl. The south side of Montella Dr from Carano Pl to Trivento Pl.

Ground Cover area: 6,797 square feet
Turf area: 2,462 square feet
Hardscape area: 4,860 square feet
VG-31 The east side of Brienza Pl from Larino Dr to Letini Dr. The west side of Tindari Pl from Letini Dr to Larino Dr. The greenbelt on the south side of Marconi Pl from Trivento Pl to Comiso Way. The east side of Comiso Way from Scalea Pl to Santo Pl.

Ground Cover area: 23,419 square feet
Turf area: 18,351 square feet
Hardscape area: 13,764 square feet
VG-32 The north side of Candela Dr from Terni Pl to Bettola Pl.

Ground Cover area: 20,172 square feet
Turf area: 8,190 square feet
Hardscape area: 8,292 square feet
VG-33 The paseo at the north end of Sapri Pl to the Southern Pacific Railroad.

Ground Cover area: 894 square feet
Hardscape area: 318 square feet
VG-34 The paseo at the north end of Bronte Pl to the Southern Pacific Railroad.

Ground Cover area: 894 square feet
Hardscape area: 318 square feet
VG-35 The east side of Rochester Ave from 555 feet south of Palmi Dr to Victoria Park Ln.

The south side of Victoria Park Ln and median from Rochester Ave to east side of Deer Creek Channel.

Ground Cover area: 53,646 square feet
Turf area: 11,150 square feet
Hardscape area: 17,555 square feet

Page 258 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 20 Fiscal Year 2026/27
VG-36 The north side of Victoria Park Ln from the east side of Deer Creek Channel to Rochester Ave.

Ground Cover area: 55,780 square feet
Turf area: 10,500 square feet
Hardscape area: 8,004 square feet
VG-37 The paseo at the end of Ardmoor Ct to the Southern Pacific Railroad.

Ground Cover area: 1,350 square feet
Hardscape area: 950 square feet
VG-38 The east side of Milliken Ave from 106 feet north of Victoria Park Ln to Kenyon Way.

The north and south side of Spring Mist Dr from Milliken Ave to Summerstone Ct. The south side of Kenyon Way from Milliken Ave to Kenyon Park.

Ground Cover area: 28,051 square feet
Turf area: 4,533 square feet
Hardscape area: 12,879 square feet
VG-39 The north side of Victoria Park Ln from Kenyon Way paseo to 132 feet east of Milliken Ave. The Kenyon Way paseo from Victoria Park Ln to Fairwinds Ct. The paseo from Victoria Park Ln to the south west corner of Kenyon Park.

Ground Cover area: 55,089 square feet
Turf area: 13,120 square feet
Hardscape area: 7,676 square feet
VG-40 The south side of Highland Ave from 413 feet west of Highland Ave paseo to Highland Ave paseo. The east side of Highland Ave paseo from Highland Ave to Kenyon Way.

The north side of Kenyon Way from Highland Ave paseo to Autumn Glen Ct.

Ground Cover area: 56,553 square feet
Hardscape area: 12,314 square feet
VG-41 The west side of Rochester Ave from 294 feet south of Highland Ave to Lark Dr. The north side of Lark Dr from Rochester Ave to 1230 feet west of Rochester Ave.

Ground Cover area: 31,413 square feet
Hardscape area: 13,338 square feet
VG-42 The south side of Highland Ave from 1,314 feet west of Rochester Ave to Rochester Ave. The west side of Rochester Ave from Highland Ave to 294 feet south of Highland Ave. The north side of Highland Ave from Rochester Ave to Woodruff Pl.

Ground Cover area: 40,346 square feet
Hardscape area: 15,445 square feet

Page 259 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 21 Fiscal Year 2026/27
VG-43 The north side of Victoria Park Ln and the median from Day Creek Blvd to Day Creek Channel. The east and west side of Kensington Pl from Victoria Park Ln to Stratford Dr.

Ground Cover area: 70,669 square feet
Turf area: 7,888 square feet
Hardscape area: 18,426 square feet
VG-44 The west side of Day Creek Blvd from 572 feet north of Silverberry St to Day Creek Blvd. The south side of Silverberry St from Kensington Pl to Day Creek Blvd.

Ground Cover area: 36,835 square feet
Hardscape area: 24,376 square feet
VG-45 The west side of Milliken Ave and the Milliken Ave median from the 210 freeway to Kenyon Way.

Ground Cover area: 10,658 square feet
Turf area: 610 square feet
Hardscape area: 5,589 square feet
VG-46 The Base Line Rd median from 657 feet east of Virginia Pl to Rochester Ave. The north side of Base Line Rd from 278 feet east of Virginia Pl to Rochester Ave. The paseo from the northeast corner of Rochester Ave and Base Line Rd to Huntley Dr.

The east side of Rochester Ave from Base Line Rd to 105 feet north of Shenandoah Dr.

Ground Cover area: 35,823 square feet
Hardscape area: 23,645 square feet
VG-47 The north side of Base Line Rd from 400 feet east of Day Creek Blvd to Day Creek Blvd. Base Line Rd median from Day Creek Blvd to 595 feet east of Day Creek Blvd.

Ground Cover area: 9,515 square feet
Hardscape area: 7,926 square feet
VG-48 The east side of Day Creek Blvd and median from Base Line Rd to Victoria Park Ln.

The south side of Victoria Park Ln from Day Creek Blvd to 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd.

Ground Cover area: 50,318 square feet
Turf area: 3,234 square feet
Hardscape area: 29,217 square feet

Page 260 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 22 Fiscal Year 2026/27
VG-49 The north side of Victoria Park Ln and median from 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd to Day Creek Blvd. The east side of Day Creek Blvd from Victoria Park Ln to Highland Ave. The south side of Highland Ave from Day Creek Blvd to 440 feet east of Day Creek Blvd.

Ground Cover area: 51,459 square feet
Turf area: 3,930 square feet
Hardscape area: 32,296 square feet
VG-50 The west side of San Carmela Ct from 389 feet north of Base Line Rd to Base Line Rd. The north side of Base Line Rd from Carmela Ct to 264 feet west of Durness Pl.

Ground Cover area: 18,043 square feet
Hardscape area: 12,383 square feet
VG-51 The Paseo south of Saxon Dr to Southern Pacific Railroad.

Ground Cover area: 1,398 square feet
Hardscape area: 969 square feet
VG-52 The north side of Sugar Gum St from Milliken Ave to Kensington Pl. The south side of Sugar Gum St from Milliken Ave to 111 feet east of Suffolk Pl.

Ground Cover area: 4,362 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet
VG-53 The south side of Victoria Park Ln from 296 feet west of Kensington Pl to Milliken Ave.

The west side of Day Creek Blvd from Victoria Park Ln to 397 feet south of Sugar Gum St.

Ground Cover area: 28,532 square feet
Turf area: 11,070 square feet
Hardscape area: 7,720 square feet
VG-54 The east side of Rochester Ave from Shenandoah Dr to the Southern Pacific Railroad.

Ground Cover area: 6,864 square feet
Hardscape area: 5,136 square feet
VG-55 The paseo north of Westhaven Pl to the Southern Pacific Railroad.

Ground Cover area: 1,775 square feet
Hardscape area: 2,575 square feet

Page 261 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 23 Fiscal Year 2026/27
VG-56 The south side of Highland Ave from 1,317 feet west of Day Creek Blvd to 1,085 feet west of Day Creek Blvd including the non-irrigated slope on the south side of the sidewalk.

Ground Cover area: 5,274 square feet
Hardscape area: 1,761 square feet
VG-57 The north side of Highland Ave from Fairmont Way to the Day Creek Channel.

Ground Cover area: 16,157 square feet
Hardscape area: 17,405 square feet
VG-58 The south side of Kenyon Wy from the Kenyon Park paseo entrance to Lark Dr. The south side of Lark Dr. from 568 feet west of Kenyon Wy to Kenyon Wy. The paseo east of Kenyon Park from Kenyon Wy to the east/west paseo of site VG-23.

Ground Cover area: 24,072 square feet
Hardscape area: 9,807 square feet
Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews.

Map of Improvements
The following page shows the approximate location (for reference only – may not include all) of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites, and parks and community trails to be maintained by the District.

Page 262 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 24 Fiscal Year 2026/27

Page 263 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 25 Fiscal Year 2026/27

ESTIMATE OF COSTS
The estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year.

District Budget
Fiscal Year
2026/27 Budget
Expenditures
Personnel Services:

Regular Salaries 718,530$
Part-Time Salaries 62,490
Overtime Salaries 7,000
Fringe Benefits 383,870
Subtotal - Personnel 1,171,890
Operations and Maintenance:

Operations and Maintenance:

General Operations 98,300
Repair and Maintenance for Vehicles and Equipment 8,180 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 106,480
Contract Services:

Contract Services General 216,720
Landscaping and Parks 1,735,450
Tree Maintenance 420,280
Subtotal - Contract Services 2,372,450
Utilities:

Water Utilities 761,150
Electric Utilities 55,510
Subtotal - Utilities 816,660
Assessment Administration 24,760
Admin./General Overhead 523,880
Interfund Allocation 86,840
Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 3,931,070
Capital Expenditures:

Captial Outlay Improvements 969,800
Captial Outlay Infrastructure 250,000
Subtotal - Capital Expenditures 1,219,800
Total Expenditures Budget 6,322,760$

Page 264 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 26 Fiscal Year 2026/27
Fiscal Year
2026/27 Budget
Revenues
Taxes:

Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 4,752,620$ Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 27,410
Subtotal - Taxes 4,780,030
Other Revenues:

Park Maintenance Fees 960
Transfer In:

Transfer In - General Fund 317,450
Total Revenues Budget 5,098,440
Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance (1,224,320)$
Total Gross Estimated Assessments 4,752,472.22$
Total District EBU Count 84,518.45
Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2026/27 56.23$
Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2026/27 57.50$ Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year.

The actual assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (“EBU”) will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be the same or lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum after the application of the cost of living inflator, as defined in this report, unless the excess increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218.

It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows:

Operating Reserve
Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2026 1,796,833$ Contribution to/(Use of) Reserve - Fiscal Year 2026/27 (1,224,320) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2027 572,513$

Page 265 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 27 Fiscal Year 2026/27
Definitions of Budget Items
The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements:

Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees.

Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District.

Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements.

Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District.

This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings.

General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure.

Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking).

Page 266 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 28 Fiscal Year 2026/27

BENEFITS FROM IMPROVEMENTS AND QUANTIFICATION
Benefits from Improvements
The improvements previously defined are expected to confer certain special benefits to parcels within the District. The benefits are described below.

Sidewalks and Community Trails
People walk for a variety of reasons, whether the reason is to commute to work or school, run errands, shop, leisure activities, fitness, or some other purpose. To enhance the overall walking experience, pedestrians seek out and utilize sidewalk facilities and community trails that are in close proximity to their property and provide a safe place to walk as well as an environment that provides a certain amount of visual interest. Sidewalks and community trails serve as a critical component in the transportation network providing users access to parks and recreational areas, schools, commercial areas, and neighbors. According to the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) sidewalks provide many benefits including safety, mobility and healthier communities (FHWA, n.d). Improved Aesthetics: A survey conducted by DMB (an Arizona based commercial developer) found that there was a strong demand for communities characterized by pedestrian access, a sense of connection, and a sense of community and diversity (Urban Land Institute, 2006). According to the Urban Land Institute report Creating Walkable Places: Compact Mixed-Use Solutions, people want their neighborhoods to provide more opportunities to walk (Urban Land Institute, 2006). A survey sponsored by the Surface Transportation Policy Project found that 55% of respondents would like to walk more, 63% would like to run errands on foot and walk to stores, and 79% would like sidewalks and other places to walk and exercise (Urban Land Institute, 2006). The continued maintenance of the inter-connecting sidewalks and community trails improves the livability and appeal for properties within the District. Increased Safety: According to the FHWA, sidewalks reduce roadway accidents, including pedestrian/motor vehicle accidents. In addition, roadways without sidewalks are more than twice as likely to have pedestrians involved in accidents compared to sites with sidewalks on both sides of the street (FHWA, n.d.). In 2008, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s (NHTSA) National Pedestrian Crash Report identified California as one of the states with the highest number of pedestrian deaths (NHTSA, 2008).
Economic Activity: Uniform and well-maintained sidewalk and community trail improvements create cohesion throughout the District. This cohesion enhances both the residential and retail experience as well as encourages maximum use of building and lot area. According to Active Living Research (2010), economic benefits of walkable developments include enhanced marketability and faster sales or leases than conventional development. The National Complete Streets Coalition notes that street

Page 267 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 29 Fiscal Year 2026/27
design that is inclusive of all modes of transportation, where appropriate, not only improves conditions for and access to existing businesses, but also is a proven method for attracting new development (Pugliese, 2008).

Street Landscaping
The overall appeal and safety of an area is enhanced when landscaping improvements are in place and kept in a healthy and satisfactory condition. Conversely, appeal and safety decreases when landscaping is overgrown, unsafe or destroyed by the elements or vandalism. Improved Aesthetics: Street landscaping improvements improve the livability, commercial activity, appearance and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District. Regular maintenance ensures that the improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties adjacent to or in close proximity to the improvements within the District. According to the Victoria Transport Policy Institute (2011), streetscapes have a significant effect on how people view and interact with their community. With streetscapes that are safe and inviting, people are more likely to walk, which can help reduce automobile traffic, improve public health, stimulate local economic activity and attract residents to the community. Increased Safety: Safety for pedestrians involves not only a degree of protection from vehicular accidents, but also from criminal activity. Well maintained areas mitigate crime, especially vandalism, and enhance pedestrian safety. A recent study has found that after landscape improvements were installed, there was a 46% decrease in crash rates across urban arterial and highway sites and a second study reviewed found a 5% to 20% reduction in mid-block crashes after trees and planters in urban arterial roads were put in place. In addition, there is less graffiti, vandalism, and littering in outdoor spaces with natural landscapes than in comparable plant-less spaces (Wolf, 2010). The Victoria Transport Policy Institute (2011) has found that streetscapes reduce traffic speeds, and when combined with improved pedestrian crossing conditions, can significantly reduce collisions. Furthermore, maintained sidewalks and trails increase pedestrian safety by reducing the number of trips and falls from those using the improvements. Economic Activity: Well-maintained street landscape improvements not only make adjacent properties appear more stable and prosperous, but can spur investment in the property. According to the FHWA, landscaped sidewalks create an inviting place for customers to shop and do business (FHWA, 2001).

Parks
Park facilities enhance the overall quality of an area and are an important component of complete and sustainable neighborhoods. Neighborhood parks offer both active and passive recreational opportunities: a place to play, exercise, spend time with neighbors, or relax. The parks within the District are developed and maintained to appeal to all age groups and interests, and promote a healthy community. Recreation and park facilities have proven to be a potent factor in maintaining a high standard of livability in the community.

Page 268 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 30 Fiscal Year 2026/27
Improved Aesthetics. The park improvements provide beautification, shade and enhancement to properties, which creates a sense of community for the parcels within the District. The overall appeal and desirability of an area is enhanced when public parks and recreational facilities are in place, improved, operable, safe, clean and maintained.

Conversely, appeal and desirability decrease when park and recreational facilities are unsafe or destroyed by the elements or vandalism. According to The Trust for Public Land, Corporate CEOs say that employee quality of life is the third most important factor in locating new businesses (Harnik and Welle, n.d.).
Economic Activity: Parks attract both businesses and residents to communities.

According to The Trust for Public Land, small company owners say recreation, parks and open spaces in close proximity to properties used for business purposes are the highest priority in choosing a new location for their businesses.

As a result of the collective improvements (sidewalks, community trails, street landscaping and parks) being maintained, the overall livability for properties within the District will increase.

Livability encompasses several qualities and characteristics that are unique to a specific area.

The Victoria Transport Policy Institute (2011) expands on the concept of livability and the various benefits associated with that designation:

The livability of an area increases property desirability and business activity. Livability is largely affected by conditions in the public realm, places where people naturally interact with each other and their community, including streets, parks, transportation terminals and other public facilities. Livability also refers to the environmental and social quality of an area as perceived by employees, customers and visitors. This includes local environmental conditions, the quality of social interactions, opportunities for recreation and entertainment, aesthetics, and existence of unique cultural and environmental resources.

Quantification of Benefit
As a result of the District maintenance and servicing activities, there will be a level of general benefits to people that do not live in or intend to conduct business within the District. In order for property within the District to be assessed only for that portion of special benefits received from the District maintenance and servicing activities, general benefits provided by the ongoing maintenance and servicing of the improvements needs to be quantified. The amount of general benefit that is provided from the District maintenance activities cannot be funded via property owners’ assessments.

The District currently consists of 5,843 single family residences, 525 condominium units, 589 multi-family (apartment) units, 51.88 acres of commercial property, 4 schools, 1 Church, 1 fire station, and 56.54 acres of undeveloped property. Properties are classified by their land use code as shown on San Bernardino County’s latest secured roll.

Page 269 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 31 Fiscal Year 2026/27
Sidewalks and Community Trails
The City is comprised of many smaller communities located throughout the City. Most of the communities have parks and schools that are proximate to and serve the residents in their immediate vicinity. There are four schools in addition to the six parks within the District. Two of the four schools have school District boundaries that are only within the District. However, two of the schools include areas outside of the District as part of their school district boundaries. The primary reason persons living outside the District would enter the District would be to access the schools. Therefore, we must consider the school district boundary areas outside of the District when analyzing the pedestrian traffic that may use the sidewalks and community trails within the District.

The Summary of Travel Trends, 2009 National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) prepared by the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration (FHWA, 2011) analyzed the number of person trips by various modes of transportations such as private vehicle, transit, walking or some other means of transportation. According to the Pacific Division data extracted from the 2009 NHTS database, of the annual 181,703 (in millions) total person trips, 21,252 (in millions) or 11.70% of those person trips were made by using walking as their mode of transportation (FHWA, 2011).

According to the U.S. Census Bureau (2010), the average household size in the City is 2.98 persons. Based on this average household size, and considering there are 6,957 residential units within the District, there are approximately 20,732 people residing within the District boundaries. There are an estimated 12,000 residential units within the school district boundaries that are not within the boundaries of the District. Based on the City’s average household size, there are approximately 35,760 persons residing outside of the District boundaries, but within the school district boundaries. The following shows the estimated number of residential units and persons within the school district boundaries and either within or outside the District boundaries:

School District Population
Estimated
Number of
Residential Units
Estimated
Number of
Persons
Within District Boundaries 6,957 20,732
Outside District Boundaries 12,000 35,760
Total Population 18,957 56,492
In order to determine the estimated total number of persons who are within close proximity to the sidewalk and trail improvements, and would utilize walking as their mode of transportation, we applied the 11.70% of person trips reported from the NHTS Pacific Division study, to the total number of persons within District and school district boundaries (56,492). There are approximately 6,610 people within proximity of the District that utilize walking as their mode of transportation.

Page 270 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 32 Fiscal Year 2026/27
Applying the 2009 NHTS walking trip percentage to the District population (20,732), we estimate that of the 6,610 persons who are within close proximity of the District and use walking as their primary mode of transportation, 2,426 people are within the District boundaries. Therefore, the total surrounding neighborhood area population, located outside of the District boundaries, but in close proximity to the sidewalk and trail improvements, who use walking as their primary mode of transportation is estimated to be 4,184 people.

School District Population
Estimated Number
of Persons
Within District Boundaries 2,426
Outside District Boundaries 4,184
Total Population – uses walking as
primary mode of transportation 6,610
In order to obtain a better picture of the overall level of general benefit provided by the sidewalk and community trail improvements, the pedestrian traffic that utilizes walking as the mode of transportation that will seek out and use sidewalks and community trails within the District’s boundaries, but live outside of the District, must be considered. The 2009 NHTS further details the purposes of the 21,252 (in millions) reported walking trips. Based on the property types within the District, people utilizing the sidewalks and community trails within the District would most likely do so for the following reasons: walking to school, day care or religious activity, social or recreational activities, and shopping or running errands.

The following details the number of walking trips, based on the 2009 NHTS study, for each of the activities that are the most likely reasons people outside of the District would use the sidewalk and community trail improvements within the District:

Trip Purpose
Number of Walking
Trips (in millions)
School/Daycare/Religious Activity 872
Shopping/Errands 5,820
Social/Recreational 2,268
Don’t know/Other 139
Total 9,099
Of the total number of walking trips reported, 9,099 (in millions) or 42.81% are for purposes that persons outside of the District would utilize the sidewalk and trail improvements within the District. Applying this percentage (42.81%) to the number of people using walking as their mode of transportation and that live outside of the District (4,184), but use the sidewalks and community trails within the District, there are approximately 1,791 people using the maintained sidewalks and community trails for general benefit purposes. The persons engaging in general benefit activities represents 3.17% of the total school district population (56,492), and is therefore considered to be District general benefit.

School District Boundary General
Benefit 3.17%

Page 271 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 33 Fiscal Year 2026/27
Given the location and nature of the improvements, it is very unlikely the public at large would seek out or use the sidewalks and trails within the District, but would use those proximate to their own properties. The City has regional trails that connect different areas of the City, and those trails do appeal to and attract other residents of the City as well as residents that live outside the City. Nevertheless, it is likely that certain members of the public at large use the sidewalks or community trails within the District. As such, we have assigned a 1.00% general benefit for the sidewalk and community trails to the public at large.

Public at large General Benefit 1.00%
Based on the above calculations, the general benefit portion of the improved aesthetics, increased safety, and economic activity benefits resulting from the sidewalk and trail improvements is estimated to be 4.17% and the special benefit is estimated to be 95.83%.

Sidewalk and Trail General Benefit !Table Index
Cannot be Zero
Street Landscaping
Based upon the City’s General Plan (2010) Roadway Hierarchy, the streets within the District are classified into one of the following categories: arterial, collector, or local (minor) streets. The majority of street landscaping is located along roads classified as collector and local streets and primarily situated within the public right-of-ways of the internal local street network. A portion of the maintained landscaping is, however, located along the arterial streets, and, as such, provides some general benefit to pass-through traffic.

Local Streets
For purposes of determining general and special benefits, all streets within the District other than the specific streets listed as collector and arterial streets below are considered local streets. The local streets within the District were intended to serve individual neighborhoods and not to be pass-through streets, but cul-de-sacs or loop roads to reduce through traffic (Victoria Community Plan, 1980). In addition, according to the City’s General Plan (2010), the primary intended purpose of local streets is to serve fronting properties.

From a visual inspection of the layout of the District one must conclude that the purpose of the local streets is exclusively intended for the benefit of the parcels on such streets. There is no local street that provides a direct or efficient means of traveling from one place to another such that one could reasonably expect a driver to purposefully choose the District’s local streets as the best route for travel unless necessary because the route either began or ended with a parcel in the District. A route beginning or ending with a parcel within the District does not include the “general public” for purposes of determining general benefit.

However, one can imagine a minimal degree of pass through traffic even on something such as a cul-de-sac. As expressed by the Court in Beutz v. County of Riverside (2010), “... courts of

Page 272 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 34 Fiscal Year 2026/27
this state have long recognized that virtually all public improvement projects provide general benefits."
Given the location to the schools, parks, and shopping in the City, there are bound to be drivers that make use of the local streets for no other reason but to turn around or go back from where they came, especially if they are dropping their children off at one of the schools. Additionally, given the nature of the street landscaping, one could imagine a small degree of “residential tourism” wherein drivers are in fact simply “passing through” to enjoy the beautiful views of the homes, the natural surroundings or visiting friends. A conservative estimate of 1.00% for each scenario would result in the general benefit portion of the improved aesthetics, increase safety, and economic activity benefits resulting from the street landscaping improvements on local streets to be 2.00% and the special benefit is estimated to be 98.00%.

Local Street General Benefit 2.00%
Collector Streets: Victoria Park Ln, Etiwanda Ave, Highland Ave and Church St Because of the similarities in use, layout, type, and designation, the benefits of Victoria Park Ln, Etiwanda Ave, Highland Ave and Church St are considered to be equal. Etiwanda Ave, Highland Ave and Church St border the District and are used as the main access to and from properties within the District. Victoria Park Ln serves as the main access point to each of the four schools and is the connector street running through the District. Victoria Park Ln, Etiwanda Ave, Highland Ave and Church St connect the various neighborhoods, schools and parks within the District in addition to providing circulation between the local streets and the arterial network. As such, we must also consider the neighborhoods that surround the District and are within the school district boundaries, but not within the actual District when analyzing vehicle traffic that may use the streets within the District. The City’s Traffic Study (2009) does not include the traffic volume and number of daily trips on the connector streets within the District. As such a study is unavailable at this time we have use the NHTS Pacific Division data in order to estimate the number of drivers who use the streets within the District.

According to the Pacific Division data extracted from the NHTS database, of the annual 181,703 (in millions) total person trips, 152,827 (in millions) or 84.11% of those trips were made using a personal motor vehicle (FHWA, 2011). According to the 2001 National Household Travel Survey, household file, U.S. Department of Transportation (2001), the mean drivers per household is 1.75. Based on the drivers per household average, and considering the 6,957 households within the District, there are approximately 12,175 drivers within the District. There are an estimated 12,000 residential units within the school district boundaries that are not within the boundaries of the District. Based on the drivers per household average, there are approximately 21,000 additional drivers that reside outside of the District boundaries, but are in close proximity to the District.

Page 273 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 35 Fiscal Year 2026/27
School District Population
Estimated
Number of
Residential Units
Estimated
Number of
Drivers
Within District Boundaries 6,957 12,175
Outside District Boundaries 12,000 21,000
Total 18,957 33,175
Applying the percentage of vehicle trips (84.11%) reported from the NHTS Pacific Division study to the District and school district boundaries area outside of the District population sets (33,175), approximately 27,903 people are within proximity of the District that utilize a private vehicle as their primary mode of transportation. Applying the 2009 NHTS vehicle trip percentage to the estimated number of drivers within the District (12,175) approximately 10,240 people within the District boundaries use a personal vehicle as their primary mode of transportation. Therefore, the total surrounding neighborhood area population, located outside of the District boundaries, that uses a vehicle as their mode of transportation is estimated to be 17,663 people.

School District Population
Estimated Number
of Persons
Within District Boundaries 10,240
Outside District Boundaries 17,663
Total Population – uses personal vehicle
as primary mode of transportation 27,903
In order to obtain a better picture of the overall level of general benefit provided by the improvements, the vehicle traffic that will seek out and use the collector streets to access parcel’s within the District, but live outside of the District, must be considered. The 2009 NHTS further details the purposes of the 152,827 (in millions) reported vehicle trips. Based on the property types within the District, people utilizing the collector streets to access properties within the District would most likely do so for the following reasons: attend school, day care or religious activity, social or recreational activities, and to shop or run errands.

The following details the number of vehicle trips for each of the activities that are the most likely reasons people outside of the District would use the collector streets to access properties within the District:

Trip Purpose
Number of Vehicle
Trips (in millions)
School/Daycare/Religious Activity 6,470
Shopping/Errands 30,998
Social/Recreational 16,185
Don’t know/Other 688
Total 54,341
Of the total number of vehicle trips reported, 54,341 (in millions) or 35.56% are for purposes that persons outside of the District would most likely utilize the collector streets within the District.

Applying this percentage to the number of people using vehicles as their primary mode of

Page 274 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 36 Fiscal Year 2026/27
transportation and live outside of the District (17,663), but would use Victoria Park Ln, Etiwanda Ave, Highland Ave or Church St as a connector to their destination within the District, there are approximately 6,281 people using the maintained streets for general benefit purposes. The persons engaging in general benefit activities represents 18.93% of the total estimated drivers (33,175), and is therefore considered to be District general benefit.

As previously mentioned, the local street special benefit has been estimated at 98.00% and, as such, the estimated minimum special benefit of Victoria Park Ln, Etiwanda Ave, Highland Ave and Church St should be reduced by 2.00% to account for that portion of traffic using local streets representing general benefit.

Based on the above calculations, the general benefit portion of the improved aesthetics, increased safety, and economic activity benefits resulting from the street landscaping improvements on collector streets is estimated to be 20.93% and the special benefit is estimated to be 79.07%.

Collector Street General Benefit 20.93%
Arterial Streets: Milliken Ave, Base Line Rd, Day Creek Blvd and Rochester Ave Arterial streets are intended to provide a higher degree of mobility and generally serve longer vehicle trips. The arterial streets with landscape improvements serve not only residents in the immediate vicinity, but persons who live outside of the District and are passing by. The City’s Traffic Study (2009) does not identify the percentage of traffic on arterial streets, which is pass- through traffic.

Before we determine and allocate the percentage of special and general benefit for the arterial streets, we must first compute the estimated pass-through traffic. In lieu of having a study that identifies the pass-through traffic on the arterial streets, the estimated number of special benefit trips on the collector streets has been used since in order to enter or exit the District, a vehicle must travel on one of the arterial streets listed below. Per the City’s General Plan (2010), collector streets have an estimated 5,000 to 20,000 vehicles per day, for an average of 12,500.

Taking the 12,500 average daily trips for collector streets, 2,616 trips (20.93%) are for general benefit purposes, and 9,884 trips (79.07%), is deemed to be for special benefit purposes.

Estimated
Number of Trips
Collector Street Special Benefit – 79.07% 9,884
Collector Street General Benefit – 20.93%1 2,616
Total 12,500
(1) The 20.93% general benefit percentage already includes the 2.00% general benefit to account for the portion of traffic using for local streets.

The City’s Traffic Study (2009) does provide an estimated number of daily trips for specific areas within the District. When the City’s Traffic Study (2009) did not provide the estimated number of daily trips the average number was derived from the estimates provided in the City’s General Plan.

Page 275 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 37 Fiscal Year 2026/27
Street Name
Average Number of
Vehicles per Day1
Milliken Ave 30,400
Base Line Rd 19,140
Day Creek Blvd 25,000
Rochester Ave 12,500
(1) Average Number of Vehicles per Day is from the City’s Traffic Study for Milliken Ave and Base Line Rd, (average based on City’s Traffic Study at points of street within the District), and from the City’s General Plan for Day Creek Blvd and Rochester Ave.

Based on the estimated number of 9,884 trips for special benefit purposes, we then reduce the average number of vehicles for each arterial street, to calculate our estimated pass-through trips. The pass-through trips are vehicles driving along the maintained streets within the District for a portion of their trips, but not residing in the District or benefiting from the landscaping improvements in place.

Street Name
Average Number
of Vehicles
per Day
Less:

Estimated Special
Benefit Trips
Estimated Number
of Pass
Through Trips
Estimated %
General
Benefit
Milliken Ave 30,400 9,884 20,516 67.49%
Base Line Rd 19,140 9,884 9,256 48.36%
Day Creek Blvd 25,000 9,884 15,116 60.47%
Rochester Ave 12,500 9,884 2,616 20.93%
Although Rochester Ave is listed as an arterial, the City’s General Plan (2010) Roadway Hierarchy includes this street as a Tertiary Travel Corridor, which categorizes the street as more locally oriented and locally travelled. In addition, the Roadway Hierarchy says that the typical number of vehicles per day is between 10,000 and 15,000 (average 12,500). Etiwanda Avenue and Church St are also included in the category, and as such, the general benefit trip percentage is close to the same as for the collector streets.

As previously mentioned, the estimated minimum special benefit of Milliken Ave, Base Line Rd, Day Creek Blvd and Rochester Ave have already been reduced by 2% to account for that portion of traffic using local streets representing general benefit.

Street Landscaping General Benefit Percentage
The general benefit percentages determined in the previous sections were then applied to each type of road in the District. The area in square feet of landscaping being maintained in the District was determined by the City’s Public Works Department. The general benefit percentage for each road and street type was multiplied by the total square footage being maintained for such street. The general benefit square footage was summed for all street segments and divided into the total square footage of all landscaping maintenance. The result is the overall general benefit percentage. The following table details this calculation.

Page 276 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 38 Fiscal Year 2026/27
Street Name Street Type (1)
Total Square
Footage
General Benefit
Percentage
General Benefit
Square Footage
Milliken Ave Arterial 265,926 67.49% 179,473
Base Line Rd Arterial 367,018 48.36% 177,490
Day Creek Blvd Arterial 263,062 60.47% 159,074
Rochester Ave Arterial 175,573 20.93% 36,747
Church St Collector 181,344 20.93% 37,955
Etiwanda Ave Collector 10,358 20.93% 2,168
Highland Ave Collector 290,275 20.93% 60,755
Victoria Park Ln Collector 1,348,966 20.93% 282,339
Local/Minor Streets Local/Minor Streets 2,912,709 2.00% 58,254 Totals: 994,255
Street Landscaping General Benefit !Zero Divide
Based on the above calculations, the general benefit portion of the improved aesthetics, increased safety, and economic activity benefits resulting from the street landscaping improvements is estimated to be 17.10% and the special benefit is estimated to be 82.90%.

Neighborhood Parks
The six parks within the District were installed specifically for the residents of the District. Each of the parks is considered to be a neighborhood park, intended to serve those parcels within a one-half mile radius from the park. All parcels within the District are within a one-half mile from one of the six neighborhood parks, and most parcels outside of the District have their own neighborhood parks within close proximity. Even though the park facilities were installed for the benefit of the residents and those working within the District, there will be some general benefit to those people who do not live or conduct business inside the District.

There are 43.10 acres of park land within the District. According to the Trip Generation (2003) report, a City park generates an average of 1.59 trips per acre, with a range of rates between

1.04 – 8.00 (arithmetic mean is 4.52). Considering the mean rate per acre (4.52 trips), there are approximately 195 daily trips generated for parks within the District. According to the 2009 NHTS database, the average number of persons per vehicle is estimated to be 1.61 persons.

Therefore, based on the 195 daily park trips generated, 314 people are using the parks within the District.

There is a standard of one-half mile as a reasonable distance to walk to a park (California DOT, 1979). There are 6,957 households within the District, and an additional 1,834 households that are within a one-half mile and have direct access to the parks, but whose properties are not within the boundaries of the District.

Page 277 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 39 Fiscal Year 2026/27
One-Half Mile
Park Population
Estimated
Number of
Residential Units Percentage
Within District Boundaries 6,957 79.14%
Outside District Boundaries 1,834 20.86%
Total Population 8,791 100.00%
To allocate the average of park trips generated and people using the parks within the District, we allocate the 314 estimated people using the parks daily by the percentages shown above.

Based on the one-half mile radius population, approximately 66 people may use the parks within the District, but living outside of the boundaries of the District.

One-Half Mile
Park Population
Estimated
Number of
People Using
Parks Daily
Within District Boundaries 248
Outside District Boundaries 66
Total Population 314
A factor that has been considered is that most of the people living within the one-half mile radius from the parks within the District also live within a closer distance to other parks that are not within the District, and will most likely use the parks that are closer in proximity to their property.

However, in calculating the general benefit usage we recognize that those people may still use the District parks.

Taking the 66 persons using the parks within the District, but residing outside of the District, divided by the total population residing outside of the District, but within one-half mile from the parks (1,834), the estimated percentage of persons engaging in general benefit park activities that do not reside within the District represents 3.60%.

One-Half Mile Boundary General Benefit 3.60%
Given the location and size of the parks, it is very unlikely the public at large would seek out or use these smaller, local parks. Especially, when the City has larger community and regional parks that are intended to attract people from outside areas, and provide recreational opportunities beyond those supplied by the neighborhood parks. However, various sports teams are allowed access to the parks for games even though according to the City, sports teams with members residing within the District are given first priority for use of the parks. Nevertheless, it is likely that certain members of the public at large may use the smaller parks, and as such, we have assigned a 1.00% general benefit for the park improvements to the public at large.

Public at large General Benefit 1.00%

Page 278 ends

Rancho Cucamonga City CouncilJune 3, 2026

Rancho Cucamonga City Council
June 3, 2026