Agenda packet — Rancho Cucamonga City Council, June 3, 2026 (part 5 of 12)

Page 2 ends

3 4
4 9
term of four years. The Resolution calling and giving notice of the November 3, 2026, election, requesting consolidation and determining tie-votes by lot is attached for consideration.

Also attached is a Resolution establishing regulations for candidates for elective office pertaining to candidate statements submitted to the voters. Only candidates wishing to submit a candidate statement will be required to pay a deposit to cover the cost of printing the statement in the voter information guide.

The nomination period begins on Monday, July 13, 2026, and will close Friday, August 7, 2026, at 4:30 p.m. Candidates are strongly encouraged to schedule an appointment to complete the nomination filing process. If an incumbent does not file, the period is extended to Wednesday, August 12, 2026, at 4:30 p.m. for candidates other than the incumbent to file for that office (Elections Code Section 10225).

FISCAL IMPACT:

The City Clerk Services Department will ensure sufficient funds are available in the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Budget.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

This item addresses the City Council’s vision of providing an opportunity for all to thrive by building a world class community through the municipal election process.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Resolution No. 2026-038 - Calling and Giving Notice of a November 3, 2026, General Municipal Election and Requesting Consolidation with the Statewide General Election
Attachment 2 – Resolution No. 2026-039 - Adopting Regulations Pertaining to Candidate Statements

Page 622 ends

Resolution No. 2026-XXX – Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT 1
6 8
6 7
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO

CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE

HOLDING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION ON TUESDAY,
NOVEMBER 3, 2026, FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS AND

REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF

SAN BERNARDINO TO CONSOLIDATE THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL

ELECTION WITH THE STATEWIDE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION
TO BE HELD PURSUANT TO ELECTIONS CODE SECTION 10403

RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES
WHEREAS, under the provisions of the laws relating to general law cities in the State of California, a General Municipal Election shall be held on November 3, 2026, for the election of municipal officers; and

WHEREAS, it is desirable that the General Municipal Election be consolidated with the Statewide General Election to be held on the same date and that within the city, the precincts, polling places, and election officers of the two elections be the same, and that the County Election Department of the County of San Bernardino canvass the returns of the General Municipal Election and that the election be held on all respects as if there were only one election; and

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Pursuant to the requirements of the laws of the State of California relating to General Law cities, there is called and ordered to be held in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, a General Municipal Election for the purpose of electing one (1) Mayor elected at large; one (1) Member of the City Council from District 2; and one (1) Member of the City Council from District 3, each for the full term of four years.

Section 2. The ballots to be used at the election shall be in the form and content as required by the law.

Section 3. The City Clerk Services Director is authorized, instructed, and directed to procure and furnish any and all official ballots, notices, printed matter, and all supplies, equipment, and paraphernalia that may be necessary in order to properly and lawfully conduct the election.

Section 4. The polls for the election shall be open at seven o’clock a.m. on the day of the election and shall remain open continuously from that time until eight o’clock p.m. of the same day when the polls shall be closed, except as provided under Section 14401 of the elections code.

Section 5. In all particulars not recited in this Resolution, the election shall be held and conducted as provided by law for holding municipal elections.

Section 6. That pursuant to the requirements of Section 10403 of the Elections Code, the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino is hereby requested to consent and agree to the consolidation of a General Municipal Election with the Statewide General Election on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, for the purpose of electing one (1) Mayor at large; one (1) Member of the City Council from District 2; and one (1) Member of the City Council from District 3, each for a full term of four years.

Section 7. The County Registrar of Voters is authorized to canvass the returns of the Regular

Page 623 ends

Resolution No. 2026-XXX – Page 2 of 2
ATTACHMENT 1
6 8
6 7
Municipal Election. The election shall be held in all steps necessary for the holding of the consolidated election.

Section 8. The Board of Supervisors is requested to issue instructions to the County Registrar of Voters to take any and all steps necessary for the holding of the consolidated election.

Section 9. The City of Rancho Cucamonga shall reimburse the County of San Bernardino for services performed when the work is completed and upon presentation to the City of a properly approved bill.

Section 10. Notice of the time and place of holding the election is given and the City Clerk Services Director is authorized, instructed, and directed to give further or additional notice of the election, in time, form and manner as required by the law. Notwithstanding the generality of the foregoing, the City Clerk Services Director is hereby instructed to act in conformance with California Elections Code Section 10403 and to file this Resolution with the Board of Supervisors of San Bernardino County and to transmit a copy of the same to the San Bernardino County elections official.

Section 11. That in the event of a tie vote (if any two of more persons receive an equal and the highest number of votes for an office) as certified by the Elections Official, the City Council, in accordance with California Elections Code 15651 (a) shall set a date and time and place and summon the candidates who have received the tie votes to appear and will determine the tie by lot.

Section 12. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the Book of original Resolutions.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2026.

Page 624 ends

Resolution No. 2026-XXX – Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT 2
6 8
6 8
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO

CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR

CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE PERTAINING TO CANDIDATE
STATEMENTS SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS FOR THE NOVEMBER 3,
2026 ELECTION
WHEREAS, Section 13307 of the Elections Code of the State of California provides that the governing body of any city may adopt a charge against candidates pertaining to materials prepared by any candidate for the municipal election, including costs of the candidates’ statement.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. General Provisions. That pursuant to Section 13307 of the Elections Code of the State of California, each candidate for elective office to be voted for at the General Municipal Election to be held in the City of Rancho Cucamonga on November 3, 2026, may prepare a candidate statement on an appropriate form provided by the City Clerk Services Director. Such statement may include the candidate’s name, age, and occupation and a brief description of no more than 200 words of the candidate’s education and qualifications expressed by the candidate. Such statement shall not include any party affiliation of the candidate nor membership or activity in partisan political organizations. Such statement shall be filed in the Office of the City Clerk at the time the candidate’s nomination papers are filed. Such statement may be withdrawn, but not changed, during the period for filing nomination papers and until 5:00 p.m. of the next working day after the close of the nomination period.

Section 2. Additional Materials. No candidate will be permitted to include additional materials in the voter information guide.

Section 3. Foreign Language Policy. Pursuant to the Federal Voting Rights Act, candidate statement will be translated into all languages required by the County of San Bernardino.

The County will mail separate sample ballots and candidate statements in the required languages to only those voters who are on the county voter file as having requested a sample ballot in a particular language. The County will make the sample ballots and candidates’ statements in the required language available at all polling places, on the County’s website, and in the Election Official’s office.

Section 4. Payment. The City Clerk Services Director shall estimate the total cost of printing, handling, translating and mailing the candidate’s statements filed pursuant to the Elections Code, including costs incurred as a result of complying with the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (as amended), and require each candidate filing a statement to pay in advance their pro-rata share as a condition of having their statement included in the voter’s pamphlet. The estimate is just an approximation of the actual cost that varies from one election to another election and may be significantly more or less than the estimate, depending upon the actual number of candidates filing statements. Accordingly, the City Clerk Services Director is not bound by the estimate and may, on a pro-rata basis, bill the candidate for additional actual expense or refund any excess paid depending on the final cost. In the event of underpayment, the City Clerk Services Director may require the candidate to pay the balance of the cost incurred. In the event of overpayment, the City Clerk Services Director shall prorate the excess amount among the candidates and refund the excess amount paid.

Section 5. That the City Clerk Services Director shall provide each candidate or the candidates’

Page 625 ends

Resolution No. 2026-XXX – Page 2 of 2
ATTACHMENT 2
6 8
6 8
representative a copy of this Resolution at the time nominating papers are issued.

Section 6. All previous Resolutions establishing Council policy on payment for candidate statements are repealed.

Section 7. This Resolution shall apply only to the election to be held on November 3, 2026, and shall then be repealed.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2026.

Page 626 ends

DATE:June 3, 2026
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:Elisa C. Cox, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Julie A. Sowles, Deputy City Manager
Robert Neiuber, Human Resources Director
Emily Nielsen, Senior Human Resources Business Partner
SUBJECT: Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving Side Letter Agreements between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Executive Management Employee Group, the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association, and the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association. (RESOLUTION NO. 2026-040) (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Side Letter Agreements between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Executive Management Employee Group, Rancho Cucamonga Management Association, and Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association.

BACKGROUND:

The City Council previously approved a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) and the Executive Management Employee Group effective January 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027.

The City Council previously approved a MOU between the City and the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association (RCMA) effective January 1, 2026 through December 31, 2027.

The City Council previously approved a MOU between the City and the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association (RCCEA) effective January 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027.

In April of 2026, the City met and conferred in good faith with the the Executive Management Employee Group, RCMA, and RCCEA and agreed to updated MOU language related to the timeframe to review the existing salary survey process.

In April of 2026, the City and RCCEA met and conferred in good faith and agreed to updated MOU language related to the classifications eligible for safety footwear.

ANALYSIS:

The agreed amendment to Section 3 of the Executive Management Employee Group MOU:

Salary Structure and Salary Survey and Section 2 of the RCMA and RCCEA MOUs: Salary Survey, extends the timeframe to the end of September 2026 for the City and the Executive Management Employee Group, RCMA, and RCCEA to work cooperatively and agree on an

Page 627 ends

Page 2 ends

3 4
7 3
updated salary survey that may, but is not limited to, include new survey cities, surveyed positions, benchmarking. If no agreement is reached by the end of September 2026, the existing survey based on accepted past practice will remain in place.

The agreed amendment to Section 39 of the RCCEA MOU: Safety Footwear and Uniforms, adds Theater Production Supervisor, Theatre Production Coordinator, and Theatre Technician III to the list of classifications eligible for City purchased safety footwear based on the requirements to wear safety footwear in the performance of their job duties.

Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Side Letter Agreements between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Executive Management Employee Group, Rancho Cucamonga Management Association, and Rancho Cucamonga Employees Association. These Side Letter Agreements shall be incorporated into the MOUs. The MOUs will remain in full force and effect except to the extent modified by these Side Letter Agreements.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Fiscal Year impact for 2025-26 is $1,750.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

This item addresses the Council’s core value of the relentless pursuit of improvement.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Resolution No. 2026-040 - Side Letter Agreements

Page 628 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX
A

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

RANCHO CUCAMONGA, APPROVING SIDE LETTER

AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

AND EXEUTIVE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEE GROUP, RANCHO

CUCAMONG MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, AND RANCHO

CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION
W
HEREAS, representatives of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ( City) and Executive Management Employee Group, Rancho Cucamonga Management Association, and Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association representatives have met and conferred pursuant to the provisions of Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (California Government Code §3500, et seq.) with regard to terms and conditions of employment; and
W
HEREAS, representatives of the City and Executive Management Employee Group, Rancho Cucamonga Management Association, and Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association have agreed upon and presented to this City Council a Side Letter Agreement (see attached Side Letter Agreements), effective June 3, 2026; and W
HEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that it is necessary for the efficient operation and management of the City that policies be established prescribing salary ranges, benefits and holidays and other policies for employees of t he City of Rancho Cucamonga; and
W
HEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has previously adopted salary resolutions establishing salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment for employees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and
W
HEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that it is necessary from time to time to amend the salary resolution to accommodate changes in position titles, classifications salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment; and NO

W, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES that said Side Letter Agreements with Executive Management Employee Group, Rancho Cucamonga Management Association, and Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association are hereby approved and the City Manager is hereby authorized to sign said Side Letter Agreements on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.

PA
SSED, APROVED AND ADOPTED this ______ day of ___________, 2026.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 629 ends

SIDE LETTER AGREEMENT

BETWEEN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

AND EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEE GROUP
The City of Rancho Cucamonga (''City'') and the Executive Management Employee Group (collectively, the "Parties'') entered into a Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU'') that commenced on January 1, 2026 and expires on June 30, 2027.

The Parties met and conferred in good faith in April of 2026. The Parties agreed to amending MOU language related to a timeline for reviewing and updating the salary survey.

SECTION 3 : SALARY S TRUCTURE AND SALARY S URVEY
C. During the first six months of the MOU, the Executive Management Employee Group (EMG) and the City will work cooperatively to agree on an updated salary survey that may, but is not limited to, include new survey cities, surveyed positions, and benchmarking. If EMG and the City do not reach an agreement by the end of September 2026, the existing survey based on accepted past practice will remain in place. Both parties agree to biweekly meetings during that period to work cooperatively on this matter.

This Side Letter of Agreement shall be incorporated into the MOU. The MOU shall remain in full force and effect except to the extent modified by this Side Letter of Agreement. This Side Letter of Agreement shall not be effective until ratified by the City Council and approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association.

For
the City of Rancho Cucamonga For Executive Management Employee Group ___________________________________
___________________________________
Elisa C. Cox Jennifer Gracia
City Manager Deputy City Manager

Page 630 ends

SIDE LETTER AGREEMENT

BETWEEN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION
The City of Rancho Cucamonga (''City'') and the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association (collectively, the "Parties'') entered into a Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU'') that commenced on January 1, 2026 and expires on December 31, 2027.

The Parties met and conferred in good faith in April of 2026. The Parties agreed to amending MOU language related to a timeline for reviewing and updating the salary survey.

SECTION 2 : SALARY S URVEY
During the first six months of the MOU, RCMA and the City will work cooperatively to agree on an updated salary survey that may, but is not limited to, include new survey cities, surveyed positions, benchmarking, and timelines. If RCMA and the City do not reach an agreement by the end of September 2026, the existing survey based on accepted past practice will remain in place. Both parties agree to biweekly meetings during that period to work cooperatively on this matter.

This
Side Letter of Agreement shall be incorporated into the MOU. The MOU shall remain in full force and effect except to the extent modified by this Side Letter of Agreement. This Side Letter of Agreement shall not be effective until ratified by the City Council and approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association.

For
the City of Rancho Cucamonga For Rancho Cucamonga Management Association
___________________________________
___________________________________
Elisa C. Cox Justine Garcia
City Manager Deputy Director of Engineering

Page 631 ends

SIDE LETTER AGREEMENT

BETWEEN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION
The City of Rancho Cucamonga (''City'') and the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association (collectively, the "Parties'') entered into a Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU'') that commenced on January 1, 2026 and expires on June 30, 2027.

The Parties met and conferred in good faith in April of 2026. The Parties agreed to amending MOU language related to a timeline for reviewing and updating the salary survey and adding classifications eligible for safety footwear.

SECTION 2: SALARY SURVEY
The City shall conduct a salary survey of labor market cities approximately six months before the start of new labor negotiations for the next MOU.

During the first six months of the MOU, RCCEA and the City will work cooperatively to agree on an updated salary survey that may, but is not limited to, include new survey cities, surveyed positions, benchmarking. If RCCEA and the City do not reach an agreement by the end of September 2026, the existing survey based on accepted past practice will remain in place. Both parties agree to biweekly meetings during that period to work cooperatively on this matter.

SECTION 39: SAFETY FOOTWEAR AND UNIFORMS
A. Saf
ety Footwear
Th
e City will provide up to $350.00 annually toward the purchase of safety footwear at a city designated vendor for employees required to wear safety footwear in the performance of their job duties. The current classification of employees who may be required to we ar safety footwear are Animal License Canvasser, Animal Services Officer I & II, Assistant Engineer, Associate Engineer, Building Inspector, Building Inspector Supervisor, Business License Technician, Community Improvement Officer I & II, Community Improvement Supervisor, Environmental Programs Coordinator, Environmental Programs Inspector, Fleet Supervisor, Maintenance Supervisor, Public Works Inspector, Public Works Inspector I, Public Works Inspector II, Safety Officer, Senior Animal Services Officer, Senior Building Inspector, Senior Electrician, Supervising Public Works Inspector, and Theatre Production Supervisor, Theatre Production Coordinator, and Technician III.

Ef
fective the first full pay period in July 2021, this allowance would permit the use of the allowance for the purchase of both shoes and accessories.

Thi
s Side Letter of Agreement shall be incorporated into the MOU. The MOU shall remain in full force and effect except to the extent modified by this Side Letter of Agreement. This Side Letter of Agreement shall not be effective until ratified by the City Council and approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association.

Page 632 ends

For
the City of Rancho Cucamonga For Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association
___________________________________
___________________________________
Elisa C. Cox Jonathan Hilton
City Manager RCCEA President

Page 633 ends

ORDINANCE NO. 1056

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO

CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MUNICIPAL CODE
AMENDMENT TO AMEND TITLE 17 (“DEVELOPMENT CODE") OF THE

RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO PROHIBIT HOME

EXPERIENCE SHARING AND FINDING AN EXEMPTION FROM THE

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT UNDER SECTIONS
15060(C)(2) AND 15061(B)(3) OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council waive full reading and adopt Ordinance No. 1056 amending Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code pertaining to the prohibition of home experience sharing in all zones.

BACKGROUND:

The introduction and first reading of the above-entitled Ordinance was conducted at the Adjourned Regular City Council Meeting of May 21, 2026. Votes at first reading: AYES: Michael, Kennedy, Hutchison, Scott, Stickler.

ANALYSIS:

Please refer to the May 21, 2026 City Council staff report.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Please refer to the May 21, 2026 City Council staff report.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

Please refer to the May 21, 2026 City Council staff report.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 –Ordinance No. 1056

Page 634 ends

ATTACHMENT 1
ORDINANCE NO. XXXX

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A
MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT TO AMEND TITLE 17
(“DEVELOPMENT CODE") OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA

MUNICIPAL CODE TO PROHIBIT HOME EXPERIENCE

SHARING AND FINDING AN EXEMPTION FROM THE

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT UNDER
SECTIONS 15060(C)(2) AND 15061(B)(3) OF THE CEQA
GUIDELINES.

WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is responsible for enacting and implementing regulations governing the use of land and the conduct of business activities within its boundaries; and,
WHEREAS, within the past few years, the rental of recreational amenities (e.g., swimming pools; playgrounds; barbeques and grills; pickleball courts, tennis courts, and other sports areas; and other exterior portions of real properties) separate and apart from the rental of the residential dwelling – a use that is commonly known as “Home Experience Sharing”, has surged in popularity. While the rental of recreational amenities as part of a Home Experience Sharing can provide supplemental income to families within our community and provide recreational opportunities for persons without these amenities, there are a number of adverse impacts upon residential neighborhoods – including, but not limited to, increased noise, disorderly conduct, and lack of adequate off-street parking for residents, that the City’s current laws would not adequately address. Such impacts would, in turn, result in potential conflicts between Home Experience Sharing guests and neighbors – and an increased expenditure of City resources in responding to complaints. Additionally, Home Experience Sharing raises health and safety concerns as there are currently no regulations pertaining to minimum standards for maintenance of the recreational amenities, sanitation facilities (especially since the recreational facilities are not rented in conjunction with a residential building), insurance coverage to cover accidents or injuries suffered by these social guests; and,
WHEREAS, on September 17, 2024, in accordance with California Government Code Section 65858, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 1030, which enacted an initial 45-day moratorium on Home Experience Sharing in the City; and,
WHEREAS, on October 15, 2024, in accordance with California Government Code Section 65858(a), the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 1032, which extended the moratorium (enacted pursuant to Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 1030) by an additional 10 months and 15 days; and, WHEREAS, on July 16, 2025, in accordance with California Government Code Sections 65858 and 65090, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 1043, which extended the moratorium (initially enacted pursuant to Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 1030 and subsequently extended by Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 1032) by an additional 12 months (beyond September 17, 2025), in order to allow City Staff sufficient time to prepare a permanent ordinance prohibiting Home Experience Sharing; and,

Page 635 ends

6 9
0 9
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (“City”) has prepared a Municipal Code Amendment (set forth in EXHIBIT 1) to prohibit the use of any land within the City for Home Experience Sharing; and,
WHEREAS, on April 22, 2026, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the proposed Municipal Code Amendment and concluded said hearing on that date, at which point, the Planning Commission voted to adopt Resolution No. 2026-012 recommending that the City Council adopt the Municipal Code Amendment.

WHEREAS, on ____________, 2026, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing, considered all written and oral Staff reports, together with public testimony, and concluded said hearing on that date, and thereafter introduced for first reading this Ordinance; and,
WHEREAS, based upon the reports and testimony presented to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council specifically finds that Home Experience Sharing would have extensive adverse impacts upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community – including, but not limited to, as a result of increased noise, disorderly conduct, lack of adequate sanitation facilities, and lack of adequate on-street and off-street parking for residents and guests; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to prohibit properties within all Residential Zones of the City from being used for Home Experience Sharing to prevent the adverse impacts resulting therefrom; and,
WHEREAS, All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: The City Council hereby specifically finds that each of the recitals set forth hereinabove are true and correct, and are incorporated by this reference as findings in support of this Ordinance.

SECTION 2: DEFINITIONS. Section 17.140.020 (“Universal Definitions”) of Chapter 140 (“Universal Definitions”) of Article IX (“Glossary”) of Title 17 (“Development Code”) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to add a definition for “Home Experience Sharing” to read as follows:
“Home experience sharing”
shall mean the rental or lease of a recreational amenity or recreational amenities located on real property zoned and/or developed for residential use within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, separate from or otherwise not in conjunction with the rental of a residential dwelling unit.

Page 636 ends

6 9
0 9
SECTION 3: DEFINITIONS. Section 17.140.020 (“Universal Definitions”) of Chapter 140 (“Universal Definitions”) of Article IX (“Glossary”) of Title 17 (“Development Code”) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to add a definition for “Recreational Amenity” to read as follows:
“Recreational amenity”
shall include any swimming pool, barbeque, grill, pickleball court, basketball court, tennis court, playground, yard area, or other portion of a residentially zoned and/or developed property that is designed or used for recreational activities.

SECTION 4: PROHIBITED LAND USE BY BASE ZONE. Table 17.30.030-1 (“Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements by Base Zone”) of Section 17.30.030 (“Allowed Land Use by Base Zone”) of Chapter 17.30 (“Allowed Land Use by Base Zone”) of Article III (“Zones, Allowed Uses, and Development Standards”) of Title 17 (“Development Code”) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to add “Home Experience Sharing” as “Not Permitted” in all zones.

SECTION 5: PROHIBITED LAND USE BY PLACETYPE. Table 17.38.060-1 (“Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements by Placetype”) of Section 17.38.060 (“The Resort.”) of Chapter 17.38 (“Overlay Zones and Other Special Planning Areas”) of Article III (“Zones, Allowed Uses, and Development Standards”) of Title 17 (“Development Code”) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to add “Home Experience Sharing” as “Not Permitted” in all placetypes – including Village Neighborhood (“VN”), Core Living (“CL”), Urban Neighborhood (“UN”), Transit (“T”), Mixed Use (“MU”), Recreation (“REC”), and Mixed-Use Overlay (“MU Overlay”).

SECTION 6: Section 17.38.060 (“The Resort”) of Chapter 17.38 (“Overlay Zones and Other Special Planning Areas”) of Article III (“Zones, Allowed Uses, and Development Standards”) of Title 17 (“Development Code”) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to add a Subsection D to read as follows:

D.Notwithstanding any other provision of this code, in the event of any conflict between this Section and the specific plan, the Development Code shall prevail.

SECTION 7: PROHIBITED LAND USE IN ETIWANDA HEIGHTS
NEIGHBORHOOD. Table 17.38.070-1 (“Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements for the Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan”) Section 17.38.070 (“Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan.”) of Chapter 17.38 (“Overlay Zones and Other Special Planning Areas”) of Article III (“Zones, Allowed Uses, and Development Standards”) of Title 17 (“Development Code”) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to add “Home Experience Sharing” as “Not Permitted” in all zones within the Neighborhood Area (“NA”) and Rural/Conservation Area (“RCA”).

SECTION 8: PROHIBITED LAND USE BY FORM-BASED ZONE. Table

17.136.020-1 (“Allowed Land Uses in Form-Based Zones”) of Section 17.136.020 (“Allowed Land Uses.”) of Chapter 17.136 (“Land Use Standards”) of Article VIII (“Form-Based Code”) of Title 17 (“Development Code”) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to add “Home Experience Sharing” as “Not Permitted” in all form-based zones.

Page 637 ends

6 9
0 9
SECTION 9: CEQA. The City Council hereby finds that it can be seen with certainty, that there is no possibility that the adoption of this Ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment, because the Ordinance will prohibit the granting of any zoning approval, home occupation permit, or other permit, license, or land use entitlement for Home Experience Sharing in the City in order to protect the public health, safety, and general welfare, and will thereby serve to avoid potentially significant environmental impacts. It is therefore not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act review pursuant to Title 14, Chapter 3, Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15061(b)(3) of the California Code of Regulations.

SECTION 10: SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase in this Ordinance or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective.

SECTION 11. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law.

SECTION 12: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its adoption pursuant to California Government Code section 36937.

APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS THIRD DAY OF JUNE 2026.

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:

L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the third day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ATTEST:_______________________________
City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
City Clerk

Page 638 ends

6 9
0 9
EXHIBIT 1

1. Added to Section 17.140.020 (“Universal Definitions”) of Chapter 140 (“Universal Definitions”) of Article IX (“Glossary”) of Title 17 (“Development Code”):
“Home experience sharing”
shall mean the rental or lease of a recreational amenity or recreational amenities located on real property zoned and/or developed for residential use within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, separate from or otherwise not in conjunction with the rental of a residential dwelling unit. “Recreational amenity”
shall include any swimming pool, barbeque, grill, pickleball court, basketball court, tennis court, playground, yard area, or other portion of a residentially zoned and/or developed property that is designed or used for recreational activities.

2. Amended Table 17.30.030-1 (“Allowed Land Use and Permit Requirements by Base Zone”) of Section 17.30.030 (“Allowed Land Use by Base Zone”) of Section 17.38.060 (“The Resort.”) of Chapter 17.30 (“Allowed Land Use by Base Zone”) of Article III (“Zones, Allowed Uses, and Development Standards”) of Title 17 (“Development Code”):

TABLE 17.30.030-1: ALLOWED LAND USES AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS BY BASE ZONE Land Use/Zoning District VL L LM M MH H NI IE OSC HR P FC/UC Residential Uses
Home Experience Sharing N N N N N N N N N N N N

3. Amended Table 17.38.060-1 (“Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements by Placetype”) of Section 17.38.060 (“The Resort.”) of Chapter 17.38 (“Overlay Zones and Other Special Planning Areas”) of Article III (“Zones, Allowed Uses, and Development Standards”) of Title 17 (“Development Code”):

Placetype VN CL UN T MU Rec MU Overlay*
Residential Uses
Home Experience Sharing N N N N N N N

4. Added to Section 17.38.060 (“The Resort”) of Chapter 17.38 (“Overlay Zones and Other Special Planning Areas”) of Article III (“Zones, Allowed Uses, and Development Standards”) of Title 17 (“Development Code”):

D. Notwithstanding any other provision of this code, in the event of any conflict between this Section and the specific plan, the Development Code shall prevail.

5. Amended Table 17.38.070-1 (“Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements for the Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan”) of Section 17.38.070 (“Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan.”) of Chapter 17.38 (“Overlay Zones and Other Special Planning Areas”) of Article III (“Zones, Allowed Uses, and Development Standards”) of Title 17 (“Development Code”):

Page 639 ends

6 9
0 9
Neighborhood Area (NA) Rural/Conservation Area (RCA) (1) Regulating Zones/
Subzones SR NG-2 NG-1 NE R-OS R-H R-FC/UC R-C
Residential Uses
Home Experience Sharing N N N N N N N N

6. Amended Table 17.136.020-1 (“Allowed Land Uses in Form-Based Zones”) of Section

17.136.020 (“Allowed Land Uses.”) Chapter 17.136 (“Land Use Standards”) of Article VIII (“Form-Based Code”) of Title 17 (“Development Code”):

Form-Based Zone
Land Use NE-2 NG3L NG3 CE1
CE1-
SWC ME1 ME2 CO1 CO2 CE2L CE2
Residential Uses
Home Experience Sharing N N N N N N N N N N N

Page 640 ends

DATE: June 3, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Elisa C. Cox, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Peter Castro, Deputy City Manager
Jennifer Nakamura, CNU-A, Planning Director
Sophia Serafin, AICP, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Public Hearing to Consider a Request to Develop an 86,194 Square Foot Industrial Warehouse Building on Approximately 5.2 Acres of Land Within the Neo-Industrial (NI) Zone, Located on the South Side of Whittram Avenue Between Etiwanda Avenue and Hickory Avenue at 13045 Whittram Avenue; APNs: 0229-162-04, -05, -11, -12, and -13.

This Item is Categorically Exempt From the Requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Under Section 15332 – Infill Development Projects. (Design Review DRC2025-00320 and
Conditional Use Permit DRC2025-00323). (RESOLUTION NO. 2026- 037) (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Planning Commission and staff recommend the City Council adopt a resolution of approval for Design Review DRC2025-00320 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2025-00323, subject to the included conditions of approval.

BACKGROUND:

The approximately 5.2-acre project site is located on the south side of Whittram Avenue between Etiwanda Avenue to the west and Hickory Avenue to the east and consists of five parcels. The project site is roughly square in shape, with a frontage width of approximately 466 feet along Whittram Avenue, a length of 459 feet along the eastern property line, a width of 514 feet along the southern property line, and a 473-foot-long western property line. The site is currently vacant and does not contain curb, gutter, or sidewalk improvements along Whittram Avenue. A Conditional Use Permit is required to be approved by the City Council for all proposed industrial buildings larger than 75,000 square feet in gross floor area. At the April 22, 2026 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission unanimously recommended approval of the project.

The existing Land Use, General Plan, and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows:

Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Vacant Neo-Industrial
Employment District Neo-Industrial (NI)
North Trucking Facility Industrial Employment Neo-Industrial (NI)

Page 641 ends

Page 2 ends

3 4
9 2
District
South Manufacturing Warehouse Neo-Industrial
Employment District
Industrial
Employment (IE)
East Auto Repair Neo-Industrial
Employment District Neo-Industrial (NI)
West Construction Material Storage
Yard / Trucking Facility
Neo-Industrial
Employment District Neo-Industrial (NI)
Figure 1 – Site Map
Previous Public Hearings
On April 22, 2026, the Planning Commission considered the subject project at a duly noticed public hearing and unanimously voted to recommend the project to the City Council for approval as proposed. There were no concerns expressed with the proposed project during the Commissioner’s deliberation.

Additionally, a Design Review (DRC2022-00156) and Conditional Use Permit (DRC2023-00142) were previously recommended for approval by the Planning Commission on June 28, 2023 and approved by the City Council on August 16, 2023 for the project. Both entitlements were scheduled to expire if Building Permits were not issued within two years of the approval date.

While a building permit was submitted within two years of the approval date, it was never completed and permits were not issued prior to expiration of the entitlements.

Pursuant to Section 17.14.090C.4 of the Development Code, if the time limit specified for an entitlement is reached with no extension requested, the entitlement expires. The applicant did not request a time extension for either entitlement and the previously approved entitlements expired

Page 642 ends

Page 3 ends

3 4
9 2
on August 16, 2025. The applicant has resubmitted the same project that was previously approved under the current subject applications as they intend to move forward with the same proposed development of the site. There are no changes proposed in the subject applications from what was previously approved for the site. Additionally, there have not been any significant amendments made to the Development Code since the time of the previous approval, specifically with sections related to industrial development that would require any alterations to what was previously permitted.

ANALYSIS:

Site Layout
The applicant proposes to develop a concrete tilt-up warehouse/distribution facility totaling 86,194 square feet consisting of 5,000 square feet of office space, split evenly between the ground floor and a mezzanine area, and 81,194 square feet of speculative warehouse space. Access to the site is provided through a 40-foot driveway off of Whittram Avenue in the northwestern corner of the project site. The drive aisle continues south on the site, extends east below the rear of the building, and continues back north to Whittram to a 30-foot-wide driveway in order to provide onsite circulation and a compliant fire access lane. Loading dock doors, trailer stalls, and truck queuing areas will be provided to support industrial activities on the site. Standard parking will be located along the western and southern property lines. A Southern California Edison and floor control easement exists on the eastern side of the property, being approximately 81 feet wide along Whittram and increasing to approximately 126 feet along the southern property line.

Development and improvements will not occur in this area.

Offsite improvements will include a street widening on Whittram Avenue as well as curb, gutter, sidewalk, parkway, and driveway approach additions.

Figure 2 – Site Plan

Page 643 ends

Page 4 ends

3 4
9 2
Figure 3 – Building Rendering
Development Standard Compliance
The proposed project complies with all development standards for the Neo-Industrial (NI) zone as shown in table below:

Development Standard Required Proposed Compliant?
Building Height 70 ft (max) 47 ft Yes
Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0.6 (max) 0.48 Yes
Front Yard Setback 25 ft (min) 44 ft 10 in Yes
Interior Side Yard Setback 5 ft (min) 166 ft 6 in / 40 ft Yes Rear Yard Setback 0 ft (min) 63 ft 8 in Yes
Building Footprint 200,000 sf (max) 83,694 sq ft Yes
Open Space 10% (max) 14.3% Yes
Parking Setback 15 ft (min) 60 ft 8 in Yes
Parking
Per Table 17.64.050-1 of the Development Code, the parking requirement for the development is based on the proposed mix of office and warehouse floor area in the building. Office area requires a parking ratio of four spaces per 1,000 square feet of floor area. Warehousing requires a parking ratio of one space per 1,000 square feet of floor area for the first 20,000 square feet, one space per 2,000 square feet of floor area for the next 20,000 square feet, and one space per 4,000 square feet of floor area for the remaining square footage. As such, the project is required to provide a minimum of 20 spaces for office floor area and 41 spaces for warehousing. The following table provides a breakdown of the required parking:

Page 644 ends

Page 5 ends

3 4
9 2
Use Type Square
Footage
Parking Ratio Required Provided Compliant?
Office 5,000 sf 4/1,000 sf 20 20 Yes
Warehouse 81,194 sf 1/1,000 sf for first 20,000
sf; 1/2,000 sf for next
20,000 sf; 1/4,000 sf for
remaining sf
41 41 Yes
Total 61 61 Yes
In addition to standard parking stalls, industrial projects are also required to provide one trailer parking space for each dock door located on the building. The project proposes a total of nine dock doors and nine trailer parking stalls onsite in the southwestern corner of the project site.

Environmental Analysis
The Planning Department staff determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 32 Exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 – Infill Development Projects, which includes infill development projects that are 1) consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and policies as well as applicable zoning designation regulations, 2) are developed within City limits of a site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, 3) the site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species, 4) approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air, or water quality, and 5) the site can adequately be served by all required utilities and public services.

To support this determination, a CEQA Section 15332 Exemption report (May 2023) was prepared by Dudek, an environmental consulting firm retained by the City. Staff thoroughly reviewed the exemption documentation and concluded that the proposed project would not result in significant environmental impacts, including those related to biological resources, traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality.

The following support each of the corresponding findings for the Class 32 Exemption:
1) The General Plan Land Use and Zoning designations for the project site are Neo-Industrial Employment District and Neo-Industrial (NI), respectively. The General Plan designation is intended for light industrial uses within small, modern warehouses that generate minimal impacts to adjacent properties. The project complies with the City’s development standards and design criteria for the Neo-Industrial zone as well, including, but not limited to setbacks, height, floor area ratio, and open space. The development and operation of a warehouse/distribution facility of the proposed size and configuration is compliant with the land use designations for the site.
2) Although the subject site is 5.2 acres and exceeds the five-acre threshold for the Class 32 Exemption, only 4.1 acres of the site will be developed as a 1.1-acre easement is present on the site and would not allow for any type of development or improvements to occur.

Due to the inability to develop this portion of the property, it is not considered in the total acreage of the project area for CEQA purposes. The site is also surrounded by similar industrial development and existing infrastructure, surrounding it with urbanized uses.

Page 645 ends

Page 6 ends

3 4
9 2
3) As the project site is proposed for a site that is surrounded by other industrial developments and is located within an urbanized area, existing vegetation and animal species on the site are limited. The project site has not been found to have significant value as a habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species. 4) The technical studies performed for the Class 32 Exemption supported the exemption by confirming that there would not be significant effects to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality as a result of the proposed project.
5) The project site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services as it will be located within a developed portion of the City that already has significant infrastructure in place to support further development. Improvements will be made offsite and to the site as part of the proposed project to further accommodate utilities and public services for the project area as well.

Although the Class 32 Exemption was prepared for the now expired entitlements, the current project does not include any alterations to project area, building square footage, building footprint, or circulation ad there are no changes in surrounding environmental conditions. As such, the City has determined that the project continues to meet all criteria for the Class 32 Exemption. No further environmental review is required as the existing exemption report prepared by Dudek captures the current entitlements and sufficiently evaluates the project.

Correspondence
The item was advertised as a public meeting with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin Newspaper on May 20, 2026. Public notices were mailed to 103 property owners within a 1,500-foot radius of the project site on May 19, 2026. The site was posted with one physical notice of May 20, 2026, as well. To date, staff has not received any communication from the public regarding the project.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The project site is currently subject to annual property taxes, a portion of which is allocated to the City. With the development of the industrial warehouse and related site improvements, the assessed value of the property is expected to increase, resulting in a corresponding increase in the City’s annual share of property tax revenue. Additionally, the project proponent will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees will support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

The proposed project addresses the City Council core value of commitment to prosperity as the project will develop a vacant, underutilized site, improving the site and the general area surrounding the project site. Additionally, development of an industrial warehouse will generate additional jobs within the City that can provide residents with an opportunity for employment.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Project Plans
Attachment 2 – CEQA Environmental Analysis
Attachment 3 – April 22, 2026 Planning Commission Draft Meeting Minutes Attachment 4 – Planning Commission Resolution 2026-011
Attachment 5 – Draft Resolution with Conditions of Approval

Page 646 ends

3$75,273$571(56
:+,775$0
5$1&+2&8&$021*$&$

30
3/$11,1*68%0,77$/
$
:+,775$0$9(
5$1&+2&8&$021*$&$

$
7,7/(6+((73$75,273$571(56:+,775$0$9(
$77$&+0(17

Page 647 ends

'1
.
-
* ) (
,
'
+
'
+
,
( ) *
-
.
)(E=

(+- /4 ° 6 /6 + °
); 8 (° 2/4 + °

7+(6,7(3/$16+$//0((7$//(1*,1((5,1* 13'(6
5(48,5(0(176
*(1(5$/&2175$&725725(9,(:7+(62,/65(3257
$1'$//$00(1'0(176/,67('217+(7,7/(6+((7
$1')2//2:$//5(&200(1'$7,216
821$//',0(16,21672&21&5(7(:$//6$1'
&85%6$5((,7+(5727+(&(17(5
6+2:1:,7+$
&(17(5/,1(
25)$&(2)7+(:$//25&85%$//
',0(6,21672)5$0(':$//6$5((,7+(5727+(
&(17(5/,1(2)7+(:$//)5$0,1*
6+2:1:,7+$
&(17(5/,1(
257+()$&(2)7+(:$//),1,6+
5()(572&,9,/$1'0(33/$1672&21),5087,/,7<
,1)250$7,216+2:1217+($5&+,7(&7
66,7(
3/$1$1')25$'',7,21$/87,/,7<,1)250$7,21
*(1(5$/&2175$&72572&225',1$7($//32,176
2)&211(&7,21
5()(572&,9,/'5$:,1*6)25$//),1,6+('
*5$'(6$1'6/23(6$//),1,6+('*5$'(672
3529,'(326,7,9('5$,1$*($:$<)5207+(
%8,/',1**(1(5$/&2175$&72572),(/'9(5,)<
$//$&&(66,%/(5287(6,1'(17,),('217+(6,7(
3/$1'5$:,1*66+$//&21)250727+()2//2:,1*

D
6/23(6,17+(',5(&7,212)75$9(/
'2127(;&(('&52666/23(6
'2127(;&(('
E
7+(&/($5:,'7+2)$//:$/.:$<6,6

0,1
F
&+$1*(6,1/(9(/8372&203/<Z
$&+$1*(6,1/(9(/*5($7(57+$1
,)7+(<2&&85$5(5$03('6((3/$16
G
7+(9(57,&$/&/($5$1&($/21*7+(
$&&(66,%/(5287(,60,1
$//3$9('$1'/$1'6&$3('$5($672%(%281'%<
$0,1+,*+:,'(&21&5(7(&85%821
$&21&5(7(02:675,3(;7(1',1*%(<21'($
(1'2)7+(23(1,1*6+$//%(3529,'('#$//
(;7(5,25*/$=,1*:+(5(7+(6,//,6:,7+,1

9(5,&$/2)7+(),1,6+('*5$'(6(($'
3529,'(3,3(%2//$5'3527(&7,2132676$6
5(48,5('%<87,/,7<&203$1,(6$1'25),5(
$87+25,7,(6$7$//(;7(5,25(/(&75,&$/(48,30(17
$1'),5(35(9(17,21'(9,&(6,)3,3( %2//$5'
3527(&7,213267'(7$,/6$5(1273529,'('%<
87,/,7<&203$1,(6$1'25),5($87+25,7<6((
'(7$,/$'
$//(;326('%,25(7(16,21'(9,&(&29(5,1*6
6+$//%(3$,17(')255(67*5((1
:+(5(2&&856*(1(5$/&2175$&72572
3529,'()/8,'$33/,(''$033522),1*$7$//
5(7$,1,1*$1'3/$17(5:$//6:+(5(7+(6,'(2)
7+(:$//23326,7(7+(62,/6,'(,6(;326('72
9,(:$1'$//(;7(5,25:$//6:+(5(7+(
$'-$&(17)/2256/$%,6%(/2:*5$'(6(($'
3529,'($+26(%,%1($57+(0$,1(175$1&($1',1
7+(75$6+(1&/2685(6((3/$1)25/2&$7,21
3529,'(+;&85%$7758&.&2857
/$1'6&$3($5($
&21&5(7(3$9,1*6((&,9,/
'5$:,1*6)253$9,1*6(&7,216
),5(+<'5$173529,'(3,3(
%2//$5'3527(&7,2132676$6
5(48,5('6(($'
675((7/,*+7
,1',&$7(6$1$&&(66,%/(5287(
0867&203/<Z6,7(3/$1
*(1(5$/127(
3523(57</,1(
1257+
352-(&7
/2&$7,21
:+,775$0
+,&.5<
5$,//,1(
3(&$1
(7:$1'$
352326('
%8,/',1*

6)
2)),&($5($
6)*5281'/(9(/
6)0(==$1,1(/(9(/

;
75$,/(567$//
;
75$,/(567$//
;
75$,/(567$//

;
75$,/(567$//

;
75$,/(567$//

;
75$,/(567$//

;
75$,/(567$//

;
75$,/(567$//

;
75$,/(567$//

*$7(

),5($&&(66/$1(

),5(/$1(
:+,775$0$9(
12*$5',1*/,1(6&(($6(0(17

),5($&&(66/$1(

7

),5($&&(66/$1(
$B

(/(&75220

'2&. +,'2256
$B

38%/,&$57

0,1

(
&+$,1/,1.)(1&(

758&.
48(8,163$&(

3529,'(&+$5*,1*
67$7,21)25($&+
758&.'225
7<3,&$/

'*3$7+

'5,9(

'*3$'
6&($&&(66

/21*7(50%,.(6725$*(

$B

$B

$B

0,1

)/22'&21752/($6(0(17
+$5'6&$3(
23(1$5($

6)
3/$17,1*$5($ 6)
1257+

30
3/$11,1*68%0,77$/
$
:+,775$0$9(
5$1&+2&8&$021*$&$

$
6,7(3/$1
3$75,273$571(56:+,775$0$9(
6,7(3/$1*(1(5$/127(6

352326('6,7(3/$1
.(<127(6
352326(''5,9(:$<3(5-85,6',&7,21$/67$1'$5'6
6((&,9,/'5$:,1*6)25$'',7,21$/,1)250$7,21
'(&25$7,9(3$9,1*6((/$1'6&$3,1*'5$:,1*6)25
$'',7,21$/,1)250$7,21

1 75$16)250(5/2&$7,213529,'(3,3(%2//$5'
3527(&7,21326763(587,/,7<&203$1<
5(48,5(0(1766(((/(&75,&$/'5$:,1*6)25
$',7,21$/,1)250$7,21
7<382167$1'$5'3$5.,1*67$//6(($'
(9
(/(&75,&9(+,&/(
&$3$%/(3$5.,1*67$//6((
$'$1'(/(&75,&$/'5$:,1*6
&21&5(7(7,/7836&5((1:$//3$,17%27+6,'(6$1'
7232):$//6((3/$16)25&2/256&+('8/(6((
6758&785$/'5$:,1*6)25$'',7,21$/,1)250$7,21
78%(67((/)(1&(0$;+(,*+7
$%29(+,*+(67
$'-$&(17),1,6+('*5$'(6(($'
75$6+(1&/2685(Z522)&29(5,1*
3529,'(67((//289(5('6:,1**$7(+(,*+772
0$7&+$'-$&(17:$//
3$,17720$7&+$'-$&(17
:$//3529,'(&21'8,772*$7()25)8785(02725
2)),&($5($)25)8785(,17(5&20&21752/3529,'(
.12;%2;$65(48,5('%<),5($87+25,7<6((
$'
326,7,21%,.(5$&.6(($'
(03/2<((%5($.$5($3529,'(7$%/(%(1&+(6$1'
75$6+5(&(37$&/(6

&21&5(7(758&.5$03Z+,*+&21&5(7(7,/783
*8$5'2123(16,'(
6 3$,17$//6,'(62)*8$5'
:$//6$1'+$1'5$,/66(($5&+,7(&785$/'5$:,1*6
)25&2/256&+('8/(6((6758&785$/'5$:,1*6)25
$'',7,21$/,1)250$7,21
+2855$7(':$//&216758&7,213$5$3(70,1
$%29(522)685)$&(6(($''225672%(
+2855$7('6(('2256&+('8/(3$1(/-2,17672
%(0,1+2855$7('6(($'
9,&,1,7<0$3
6,7(/(*(1'
6&23(2):25.
&216758&71(:21(6725<0(==$1,1(&21&5(7(7,/7
83:$5(+286(',675,%87,21)$&,/,7<:,7+(/(&75,&$/
$1'3/80%,1*6(59,&(6(;7(5,25/,*+7,1*/$1'&$3,1* ,55,*$7,2175$6+(1&/2685(6&21&5(7(6&5((1:$//6
$1'6/,',1*6:,1*,1*0(7$/*$7(6),5(635,1./(5$1'
*5$',1*3/$1672%($6(3$5$7(68%0,77$/$1'3(50,7
/(*$/'(6&5,37,21 =21,1*
/(*$/'(6&5,37,21
6((&,9,/'5$:,1*6
$66(6625
63$5&(/12

=21,1*

1,
1(2,1'8675,$/
$ 7,7/(6+((7
$ 6,7(3/$1
$B (1/$5*('3$57,$/6,7(3/$16
$B (1/$5*('3$57,$/6,7(3/$16
$B 6,7(:$//)(1&(3/$1
$ *5281'/(9(/)/2253/$16
$ 522)3/$1
$ (;7(5,25(/(9$7,216
$ &2/25%2$5'
& &21&(378$/*5$',1*3/$1
& &21&(378$/*5$',1*3/$1
& 6,7(87,/,=$7,210$3
& 7(17$7,9(3$5&(/0$3
& 35(/,0,1$5<:4036,7($1''5$,1$*(3/$1
& 35(/,0,1$5<:4036,7($1''5$,1$*(3/$1
/ 35(/,0,1$5</$1'6&$3(3/$1
()& 6,7(3+2720(75,&3/$1
6+((7,1'(;
3$75,273$571(56
:6816(7%/9'
/26$1*(/(6&$

&217$&7

(0$,/
.(9,1#3$75,27'(9(/230(173$571(56&20
'(9(/23(52:1(5
+(5'0$1$5&+,7(&785('(6,*1,1&
%$<9,(:&,5&/(68,7(
1(:3257%($&+&$

&217$&7
%5,'*(7+(5'0$1
3+21(

(0$,/
352-(&7$'0,1#+(5'0$1$'&20
$33/,&$17
65(35(6(17$7,9($5&+,7(&7
648$5()227$*( $&5(6
*5266
6)
*5$'$%/(
6)
*52666,7($5($
)/225$5($5$7,2
%8,/',1*$5($ 6,7($5($ )$5$//2:$%/( )$53529,'('

6) 6)
%8,/',1*$5($6800$5<
/$1'6&$3($5($6800$5<
727$/3$5.,1*5(48,5('
5(48,5('3$5.,1*%5($.'2:1
3$5.,1*3529,'('
1$0( $5($
*5281')/225
:$5(+286(
6)
2)),&( 6)

6)
0(==$1,1(
2)),&( 6)
6)
63$&(7<3( 63$&(63529,'('
67$1'$5'67$//6
67$1'$5'$&&(66,%/(67$//6
9$1$&&(66,%/(67$//6
(9&$3$%/(67$//
ZR(96(

(9&6
(9&$3$%/(67$//:(96(

(9&+$5*,1*21/<67$1'$5'$&&(66,%/(
67$//6

9$1$&&(66,%/((9&6
(9&$3$%/(67$//Z
(96(

727$/
63$&(7<3( 63$&(65(48,5('
67$1'$5'67$//6
67$1'$5'$&&(66,%/(67$//6
9$1$&&(66,%/(67$//6
(9&6
(9&$3$%/(67$//
ZR(96(

(9&$3$%/(67$//
Z(96(

9$1$&&(66,%/((9&6
(9&$3$%/(67$//
Z(96(

727$/

75$,/(53$5.,1*
5(48,5('
75$,/(53$5.,1*
3529,'('12&,7<
%8,/',1*86( %8,/',1*$5($ 3$5.,1*5$7,2; 5(43$5.,1* 2)),&( 6)
:$5(+286( 6)
:$5(+286( 6)
:$5(+286(
6)
727$/
6)
*5281'/(9(/0(==$1,1(
:$5(+286(
6)
2)),&( 6)
727$/%8,/',1*$5($
6)
127(

)52176(7%$&.
/2&$/675((7

/$1'6&$3(6(7%$&.
3$5.,1*6(7%$&.
/27$5($
/$1'6&$3,1*
5(48,5('
$5($/$1'6&$3,1*
3529,'('
/$1'6&$3,1*
3529,'('
6)
6)

Page 648 ends

/$1'6&$3($5($
&21&5(7(3$9,1*6((&,9,/
'5$:,1*6)253$9,1*6(&7,216
),5(+<'5$173529,'(3,3(
%2//$5'3527(&7,2132676$6
5(48,5('6(($'
675((7/,*+7
,1',&$7(6$1$&&(66,%/(5287(
0867&203/<Z6,7(3/$1
*(1(5$/127(
3523(57</,1(
127(6

3$,170$1'225667$,5 5$03*8$5':$//6*8$5'
5$,/6'2:1632876/289(56 522)/(9(/:$//
3$1(/5(78516720$7&+$'-$&(17%8,/',1*:$//
&2/25821
821(;7(5,256,'(2)758&.'225672%($
,17(5,256,'(72%(35(),1,6+(':,7+
0$18)$&785(5
6/,*+7*5$<
32:(5:$6+(;7(5,25&21&5(7(:$//635,2572
3$,17,1*725(029($//&+(0,&$/6$1'',577+$7:,//
,03('(7+(35,0(5&2$7)520$'+(5,1*727+(
:$//6
3$,17(;7(5,25:$//6Z&2$7635$<('$1'%$&.
52//('$&5</,&)/$735,0(5$1'&2$76635$<('21
)/$7),1,6+,17+(),1$/:$//&2/25),1,6+('-2%
6+$//%(60227+$1')5((2)/$33,1*$1'25
675($.,1*5(*$5'/(662)7+(&2/25
(;&(37:+(5(127('27+(5:,6(217+(3/$16$//
3$1(/-2,1766+$//%(&$8/.('3(5'(7$,/$'
3$,17&21&5(7(%(+,1'$1<23(175(//,6:25.7+(
&2/252)7+(75(//,6
#62/,'%52:6:,7+*/$=,1*',5(&7/<$%29(25
%(/2:3$,177+((;326(':$//&+$0)(5-867$%29(
25%(/2:7+(%52:720$7&+7+(%52:&2/25
3$,17$//:$//5(9($/67+(&2/252)7+($'-$&(17
:$//:+(17+(5(,6$&2/25&+$1*($77+(5(9($/
6(($'

8213$,177+(6,'(23326,7(7+(6,'(6+2:12)
6&5((1:$//67+(6$0(&2/25$67+(6,'(6+2:1,)
7+(5($5(7:2&2/2566+2:186(7+(%$6(&2/25
$//3$,17686('6+$//%($663(&,),('%<7+(
0$18)$&785(5)257+(352326('86(
(;7(5,253$,17
6:3(33(5&251
%/$&.$12',=('
$&0&$123<$1'%52:
0$18)
$/32/,&
&2/25
72%%/$&.
(;7(5,253$,17
6:

683(5:+,7(
6725()52170(',803(5)250$1&(
%/8(5()/(&7('*/$=,1*%/$&.
$12',=('08//,21$/7(51$7,1*
&2/25

9,67$&22/3$&,),&$$1'9,67$&22/
237,%/8(
$
%
&
'
7+(6,7(3/$16+$//0((7$//(1*,1((5,1* 13'(6
5(48,5(0(176
*(1(5$/&2175$&725725(9,(:7+(62,/65(3257
$1'$//$00(1'0(176/,67('217+(7,7/(6+((7
$1')2//2:$//5(&200(1'$7,216
821$//',0(16,21672&21&5(7(:$//6$1'
&85%6$5((,7+(5727+(&(17(5
6+2:1:,7+$
&(17(5/,1(
25)$&(2)7+(:$//25&85%$//
',0(6,21672)5$0(':$//6$5((,7+(5727+(
&(17(5/,1(2)7+(:$//)5$0,1*
6+2:1:,7+$
&(17(5/,1(
257+()$&(2)7+(:$//),1,6+
5()(572&,9,/$1'0(33/$1672&21),5087,/,7<
,1)250$7,216+2:1217+($5&+,7(&7
66,7(
3/$1$1')25$'',7,21$/87,/,7<,1)250$7,21
*(1(5$/&2175$&72572&225',1$7($//32,176
2)&211(&7,21
5()(572&,9,/'5$:,1*6)25$//),1,6+('
*5$'(6$1'6/23(6$//),1,6+('*5$'(672
3529,'(326,7,9('5$,1$*($:$<)5207+(
%8,/',1**(1(5$/&2175$&72572),(/'9(5,)<
$//$&&(66,%/(5287(6,1'(17,),('217+(6,7(
3/$1'5$:,1*66+$//&21)250727+()2//2:,1*

7<3

'*3$'

6&($&&(66

$B

$B
$B

¡

¡

&&
$
$$

6/,',1**$7(23(1,1*

& &
$
$
$$$$
$
& & &
&

& &
$
&
$

&
$

&&
$ $$
1257+

30
3/$11,1*68%0,77$/
$
:+,775$0$9(
5$1&+2&8&$021*$&$

$B
(1/$5*('
6,7(3/$16
3$75,273$571(56:+,775$0$9(
.(<127(6
(;7(5,25&2/256&+('8/(
#6+$',1*352326('/$1'6&$3,1*6((/$1'6&$3(
3/$16
$&&(66$,6/()25$&&(66,%/(3$5.,1*67$//66((
$
(9
(/(&75,&9(+,&/(
&$3$%/(3$5.,1*67$//6((
$'$1'(/(&75,&$/'5$:,1*6
(9&6
(/(&75,&9(+,&/(&+$5*,1*67$7,21
6((
$'$1'(/(&75,&$/'5$:,1*6
67$1'$5'$&&(66,%/(3$5.,1*67$//)25'(7$,/
6+2:1%87127127('6(($
9$1$&&(66,%/(3$5.,1*67$//)25'(7$,/6+2:1
%87127127('6(($
9$1$&&(66,%/((9&6
(/(&75,&$/9(+,&/(&+$5*,1*
67$7,21
6(((/(&75,&$/'5$:,1*6)25$'',7,21$/
,1)250$7,21)25'(7$,/6+2:1%87127127('6((
$
7581&$7(''20('(7(&7$%/(:$51,1*685)$&(0,1

'((3,17+(',5(&7,212)75$9(/6(($
&85%5$030$;6/23(Z0$;&52666/23(
6((&,9,/'5$:,1*6)25$'',7,21$/,1)250$7,21
&21&5(7(7,/7836&5((1:$//3$,17%27+6,'(6$1'
7232):$//6((3/$16)25&2/256&+('8/(6((
6758&785$/'5$:,1*6)25$'',7,21$/,1)250$7,21
3529,'(67((//289(5('52//,1**$7(+(,*+772
0$7&+$'-$&(17:$//
3$,17720$7&+$'-$&(17
:$//3529,'(&21'8,772*$7()25)8785(02725
2)),&($5($)25)8785(,17(5&20&21752/3529,'(
.12;%2;$65(48,5('%<),5($87+25,7<6((
$'
3529,'(67((//289(5('6:,1**$7(+(,*+772
0$7&+$'-$&(17:$//
3$,17720$7&+$'-$&(17
:$//3529,'(&21'8,772*$7()25)8785(02725
2)),&($5($)25)8785(,17(5&20&21752/3529,'(
.12;%2;$65(48,5('%<),5($87+25,7<6((
$'
3$,17('67((/6:,1*,1*3('(675,$1*$7(:+(1
2&&856,178%(67((/)(1&($/,*1723Z)(1&(
+(,*+7:+(12&&856,1&21&5(7(6&5((1:$//
821$/,*1723Z6&5((1:$//6(($'3529,'(
.12;%2;$65(48,5('%<),5($87+25,7<'225,6
3$572)(*5(66',6&+$5*($1'0$<127%(/2&.$%/(
)5207+((*5(666,'(
326,7,21%,.(5$&.6(($'
67((/3,3(%2//$5'3527(&7,2132676(($'
$&&(66,%/(%8,/',1*(175$1&('225 /$1',1*72
&203/<:,7+$
+26(%,%6((3/80%,1*'5$:,1*6
&21&5(7(7,/78375$6+(1&/2685(:$//0,1+(,*+7

$%29(+,*+(67$'-$&(17),1,6+('*5$'(3$,17
%27+6,'(6$1'7232):$//6((3/$16)25&2/25
6&+('8/(
/2&$7,212))8785(0(',80$1'+($9<'87<=(9
&+$5*,1*&$%,1(76$1'&+$5*,1*',63(16(566((
(/(&75,&$/'5$:,1*6
:$//5(9($/6(($'
6,7(3/$1*(1(5$/127(6
6,7(/(*(1'

(1/$5*('6,7(3/$11257+:(67&251(5

(1/$5*('75$6+(1&/2685(

75$6+(1&/2685((/(9$7,21

6,7(:$//*$7( :(67*$7((/(9$7,21

6,7(:$//*$7( ($67*$7((/(9$7,21

75$6+(1&/2685((/(9$7,21

75$6+(1&/2685((/(9$7,21

Page 649 ends

*5281')/225

$ %

6,'(:$/.

:$/.:$<

:+,775$0$9(
&/
)8785(
0(&+$1,&$/
(48,30(17

$B

$B

/$1'6&$3($5($
&21&5(7(3$9,1*6((&,9,/
'5$:,1*6)253$9,1*6(&7,216
),5(+<'5$173529,'(3,3(
%2//$5'3527(&7,2132676$6
5(48,5('6(($'
675((7/,*+7
,1',&$7(6$1$&&(66,%/(5287(
0867&203/<Z6,7(3/$1
*(1(5$/127(
3523(57</,1(
7+(6,7(3/$16+$//0((7$//(1*,1((5,1* 13'(6
5(48,5(0(176
*(1(5$/&2175$&725725(9,(:7+(62,/65(3257
$1'$//$00(1'0(176/,67('217+(7,7/(6+((7
$1')2//2:$//5(&200(1'$7,216
821$//',0(16,21672&21&5(7(:$//6$1'
&85%6$5((,7+(5727+(&(17(5
6+2:1:,7+$
&(17(5/,1(
25)$&(2)7+(:$//25&85%$//
',0(6,21672)5$0(':$//6$5((,7+(5727+(
&(17(5/,1(2)7+(:$//)5$0,1*
6+2:1:,7+$
&(17(5/,1(
257+()$&(2)7+(:$//),1,6+
5()(572&,9,/$1'0(33/$1672&21),5087,/,7<
,1)250$7,216+2:1217+($5&+,7(&7
66,7(
3/$1$1')25$'',7,21$/87,/,7<,1)250$7,21
*(1(5$/&2175$&72572&225',1$7($//32,176
2)&211(&7,21
5()(572&,9,/'5$:,1*6)25$//),1,6+('
*5$'(6$1'6/23(6$//),1,6+('*5$'(672
3529,'(326,7,9('5$,1$*($:$<)5207+(
%8,/',1**(1(5$/&2175$&72572),(/'9(5,)<
$//$&&(66,%/(5287(6,1'(17,),('217+(6,7(
3/$1'5$:,1*66+$//&21)250727+()2//2:,1*

D
6/23(6,17+(',5(&7,212)75$9(/
'2127(;&(('&52666/23(6
'2127(;&(('
E
7+(&/($5:,'7+2)$//:$/.:$<6,6

0,1
F
&+$1*(6,1/(9(/8372&203/<Z
$&+$1*(6,1/(9(/*5($7(57+$1
,)7+(<2&&85$5(5$03('6((3/$16
G
7+(9(57,&$/&/($5$1&($/21*7+(
$&&(66,%/(5287(,60,1
$//3$9('$1'/$1'6&$3('$5($672%(%281'%<
$0,1+,*+:,'(&21&5(7(&85%821
$&21&5(7(02:675,3(;7(1',1*%(<21'($
(1'2)7+(23(1,1*6+$//%(3529,'('#$//
(;7(5,25*/$=,1*:+(5(7+(6,//,6:,7+,1

9(5,&$/2)7+(),1,6+('*5$'(6(($'
3529,'(3,3(%2//$5'3527(&7,2132676$6
5(48,5('%<87,/,7<&203$1,(6$1'25),5(
$87+25,7,(6$7$//(;7(5,25(/(&75,&$/(48,30(17
$1'),5(35(9(17,21'(9,&(6,)3,3( %2//$5'
3527(&7,213267'(7$,/6$5(1273529,'('%<
87,/,7<&203$1,(6$1'25),5($87+25,7<6((
'(7$,/$'
$//(;326('%,25(7(16,21'(9,&(&29(5,1*6
6+$//%(3$,17(')255(67*5((1
:+(5(2&&856*(1(5$/&2175$&72572
3529,'()/8,'$33/,(''$033522),1*$7$//
5(7$,1,1*$1'3/$17(5:$//6:+(5(7+(6,'(2)
7+(:$//23326,7(7+(62,/6,'(,6(;326('72
9,(:$1'$//(;7(5,25:$//6:+(5(7+(
$'-$&(17)/2256/$%,6%(/2:*5$'(6(($'
3529,'($+26(%,%1($57+(0$,1(175$1&($1',1
7+(75$6+(1&/2685(6((3/$1)25/2&$7,21
3529,'(+;&85%$7758&.&2857

30
3/$11,1*68%0,77$/
$
:+,775$0$9(
5$1&+2&8&$021*$&$

$B
(1/$5*('
6,7(3/$16
3$75,273$571(56:+,775$0$9(

/,1(2)6,*+7

(1/$5*('(03/2<((%5($.$5($
6,7(/(*(1'
6,7(3/$1*(1(5$/127(6
.(<127(6
&21&5(7(3$9,1*6((&,9,/'5$:,1*6)25$',7,21$/
,1)250$7,21
6((6758&785$/'5$:,1*6)25758&.
$3521:+(1127&29(5('%<&,9,/'5$:,1*6

&85%5$030$;6/23(Z0$;&52666/23(
6((&,9,/'5$:,1*6)25$'',7,21$/,1)250$7,21
(03/2<((%5($.$5($3529,'(7$%/(%(1&+(6$1'
75$6+5(&(37$&/(6
K[Z&21&5(7(&85%7<3#$//&85%6,1758&.
&2857$5($

75(//,6(/(9$7,21$

75(//,6(/(9$7,21%

Page 650 ends

'1
:+,775$0$9(
(/(&75220
352326('
%8,/',1*

6)

(
&+$,1/,1.)(1&(
3523(57</,1(
352326('1(:
+0,1&21&5(7(
6&5((1:$//6
352326('
+0,175$6+(1&/2685(:$//6
352326('1(:
+0$;78%(67((/)(1&(
352326('1(:
+0$;78%(67((/
)(1&(25(7$,1,1*:$// 6((
6(&7,216)25352326('+(,*+76
(;,67,1*5(7$,1,1*:$//)(1&(72
5(0$,1
1257+

30
3/$11,1*68%0,77$/
$
:+,775$0$9(
5$1&+2&8&$021*$&$

$B
6,7(
:$//)(1&(
3/$1
3$75,273$571(56:+,775$0$9(

6,7(:$//)(1&(3/$1
6,7(:$//)(1&(/(*(1'

Page 651 ends

:+(5($0(==$1,1(2&&856$1'$7233,1*,6
&$//('287)25,17+(6758&785$/'5$:,1*6
3529,'($7+,&.7233,1*2)*<3&5(7(:,7+$
0,1,080675(1*7+2)36,
3529,'(),5((;7,1*8,6+(56$65(48,5('%<7+(),5( '(3$570(17$1'7+(&%&&)&5(48,5(0(176$1'
/2&$7,21672%('(7(50,1(',17+(),(/'%<7+(),5(
'(3$570(17,163(&725
$//3(1(75$7,2167+528*+),5(5$7('3$57,7,216
6+$//%(6($/(':,7+$33529('),5(&$8/.,1*6((
6+76$' $'
821$//',0(16,21672&21&5(7(:$//6$5((,7+(5 727+(&(17(5
6+2:1:,7+$&(17(5/,1(
25)$&(2)
7+(:$//$//',0(16,21672)5$0(':$//6$5(
(,7+(5727+(&(17(52)7+(:$//)5$0,1*
6+2:1
:,7+$&(17(5/,1(
25)$&(2)7+(:$//),1,6+
3529,'(,//80,1$7('$1'7$&7,/((;,76,*1$*(6(( (;,7,1* 6,*1$*(3/$16
6((&,9,/'5$:,1*6)25$//87,/,7<32,1762)
&211(&7,21*(1(5$/&2175$&725729(5,)<
/2&$7,216
3529,'(3,3(%2//$5'3527(&7,2132676#),5(
5,6(56 (/(&75,&$/*($5$65(48,5('%<7+(
(/(&75,&$/$1'),5(3527(&7,213/$166(($'
)25$'',7,21$/,1)250$7,21
)255(48,5('/$1',1*6#$&&(66,%/('22566((
$

12602.,1*,6$//2:(':,7,+1
2)$//%8,/',1*
(175$1&(63(5*5((1%8,/',1*67$1'$5'&2'(
',9,6,2132675(48,5('6,*1$*(
821#,17(5,253$57,7,216),1,6+('+,1*(6,'(2) -$0%72%()520),1,6+('685)$&(2),17(56(&7,1*
:$//
(;7(5,25&21&5(7(7,/783:$//3$1(/
25,17(5,25&21&5(7(7,/7830(==$1,1(
6+($5:$//3$1(/6((6758&785$/
'5$:,1*6)25$',7,21$/,1)250$7,21
6725()5217*/$=,1*6<67(06((
(1/$5*(')/2253/$16$1'(;7(5,25
(/(9$7,216)25$'',7,21$/,1)250$7,21
0(7$/678'121%($5,1*3$57,7,21:$//
6(((1/$5*(')/2253/$16 :$//7<3(
6&+('8/()25$'',7,21$/,1)250$7,21
6758&785$/%8,/',1*&2/8016
:22'678'%($5,1*:$//6(((1/$5*('
)/2253/$16 :$//7<3(6&+('8/()25
$'',7,21$/,1)250$7,21
3529,'(9$325%$55,(581'(5
352326('$1'25)8785(2)),&($5($
)/2256/$%(;7(1'0,1
%(<21'
7,$5($25$6',0(16,21('217+(
)/2253/$16(($'
),5(635,1./(55,6(56((),5(
3527(&7,213/$16$1'$'
'2257$*6((6+((7$)25'225
6&+('8/(
:,1'2:7$*6((6+((7$)25
:,1'2:6&+('8/(
:$//7$*

$
6725()52177$*6((6+((76$
$)256725()52176&+('8/(

7+()/2256/$%7+,&.1(6672%(;6((6758&785$/
'5$:,1*6)25$'',7,21$/5(48,5(0(176
7+()/2256/$%72%(&/$6693(5$&,57$%/( 7+(*(1(5$/&2175$&7256+$//&225',1$7(:,7+7+(
2:1(5:+(7+(525127723529,'(-2,17),//(5$7
)/2256/$%&21752/$1'&216758&7,21-2,176
6/23(3285675,36#(;7(5,253('(675,$1$1'
29(5+($''22566(( $'
&5$1(6&21&5(7(758&.6$1'6,0,/$5+($9<
(48,30(17$5(352+,%,7('217+()/2256/$%'85,1*
&216758&7,21
%(/2:)/2256/$%62,/&203$&7,2172%(
0,1
75(1&+62,/&203$&7,2172%(
0,1
6/$%),1,6+72%(67((/)/2$7+$5'752:(/%851,6+(' ),1,6+

7+(*(1(5$/&2175$&725720$,17$,1$&/($1)/225
6/$%$//758&.6$1'(48,30(1772%(',$3(5('
$//&216758&7,210$5.,1*66+$//%(5(029(')520
7+()/2256/$%35,25726($/,1*
6(($')256/$%3$7&+,1*'(7$,/
3529,'(
:,'(3(5,0(7(5)/2253285675,36$7
$//758&.'2&.:$//6$1'
:,'($7$//27+(5
:$//681/(66127('27+(5:,6(216758&785$/
'5$:,1*61281'(5*5281'3,3,1*&21'8,76(7&
$//2:(',13285675,36$7'2&.'225672$//2:)25
&855(1725)8785(5(&(66(''2&./(9(/(56
$//)/2256/$%1$,/25%5$&()5$0(+2/(672%(),//(' :,7+$33529('3$57(32;<&203281'720$7&+
&21&5(7(&2/253(*$%21'/9%85.((32;<
,1-(&7,215(6,125
$//)/2256/$%3$1(/)2501$,/+2/(672%(
35('5,//('$1':22''2:(/('35,25721$,/,1*
%5$&(+2/(672%(35('5,//('
&+$0)(5$1'5(9($/675,36$77$&+('727+()/225
6/$%0867%(3523(5/<3$7&+('35,25726($/,1*7+(
)/2256/$%

$$
&&
''
((
))

**
++
--

2)),&($5($
6)*5281'/(9(/
6)0(==$1,1(/(9(/

$
(/(&75220

%%

)/2256/$%6/23(6
5()(572&,9,/'5$:,1*6

(
)
*

6/23(0,16/23(0,1
0,16/23(

5$03

/$1',1*

&85%5$03

/$1',1*

5$03

/$1',1*

5$03

1257+

30
3/$11,1*68%0,77$/
$
:+,775$0$9(
5$1&+2&8&$021*$&$

$
*5281'
/(9(/)/225
3/$16
3$75,273$571(56:+,775$0$9(
1257+

30
3/$11,1*68%0,77$/
$
:+,775$0$9(
5$1&+2&8&$021*$&$

$
*5281'
/(9(/)/225
3/$16
3$75,273$571(56:+,775$0$9(
.(<127(6
)/2253/$1/(*(1'
)/2253/$1*(1(5$/127(6
)/2256/$%*(1(5$/127(6
7581&$7(''20('(7(&7$%/(:$51,1*685)$&(0,1

'((3,17+(',5(&7,212)75$9(/6(($

&21&5(7(758&.5$03Z+,*+&21&5(7(7,/783
*8$5'2123(16,'(
6 3$,17$//6,'(62)*8$5'
:$//6$1'+$1'5$,/66(($5&+,7(&785$/'5$:,1*6
)25&2/256&+('8/(6((6758&785$/'5$:,1*6)25
$'',7,21$/,1)250$7,21
67((/3,3(%2//$5'3527(&7,2132676(($'
6758&785$/%8,/',1*&2/8016((6758&785$/
'5$:,1*6)25$'',7,21$/,1)250$7,21
3$,17('&21&5(7(7,/783:$//3$1(/
3$,17('+2//2:0(7$/3('(675,$1'225
67((/6(&7,21$/29(5+($''2256(((;7(5,25
),1,6+(6/(*(1' 127(6127(216+((7$)25
&2/25

352326('%8,/',1*)/2253/$1

7<3,&$/'2&.'22563$&,1*3/$1

Page 652 ends

:?
6/)'2

*(1(5$/&2175$&725723529,'($3/<%8,/783
$63+$/7522)%<0$/$5.<
&&55
*$)
8/(5

-2+160$19,//(
8/(5
25$1
(48$/$33529('%<7+(2:1(5522)72+$9($8/
&/$66$),5(5$7,1*$63+$/772%(7580%$/
$63+$/725$1$33529('(48$/3529,'($<($5
12'2//$5/,0,7:$55$17<6(('(7$,/$')25
7<3,&$/522),1*&52666(&7,21
)257<3,&$/3$5$3(7'(7$,/66(( $'
)257<3,&$/522)7233,3(6833257'(7$,/6((
$'
)2535()$%(48,30(17&85%'(7$,/6(($'
)25(48,30(173/$7)250'(7$,/6(($'
)257<3,&$/522)3(1(75$7,21'(7$,/66((
$'
522),1*'(7$,/66+2:1217+(6(3/$16$5(
0,1,08067$1'$5'6522),1*'(7$,/63529,'('%<
7+(%8,/783522),1*0$18)$&785(56+$//7$.(
35(&('(1&(
*(1(5$/&2175$&7256+$//&21),507+(522)
(/(9$7,2166+2:1217+($5&+,7(&785$/522)
3/$1:,7+7+(6758&785$/'5$:,1*6
*(1(5$/&2175$&7256+$//9(5,)<7+(5(,6
326,7,9(522)'5$,1$*($7$//$5($62)7+(522)
35,2572,167$//,1*5,*,',168/$7,2125%8,/783
522),1*
*(1(5$/&2175$&725723529,'(&5,&.(7,1*21
7+(+,*+6,'(2)$//6.</,*+76602.(+$7&+(6
522)+$7&+(6$1'0(&+$1,&$/(48,30(176((

$'
*(1(5$/&2175$&72572&225',1$7($//522)
3(1(75$7,216
$//0(&+$1,&$/(48,30(17&21'(16$7('5$,1
/,1(672%(581%(/2:7+(522)

*(1(5$/&2175$&725723529,'(:$/.,1*3$'6
)5207+(522)+$7&+72$//2)),&($5($522)
7230(&+$1,&$/(48,30(177+(:$/.,1*3$'6
6+$//%($352'8&7$33529('%<7+(
0$18)$&785(52)7+(522),1*6<67(0
$//(;326(':22'&85%672%(35(6685(
75($7(''28*/$6),5
$//522)723(;+$867)$166+$//%(&(17(5('
',5(&7/<$%29($635,1./(5+($'&225',1$7(
/2&$7,21$1',167$//$7,21:,7+7+(),5(
3527(&7,213/$16
*(1(5$/&2175$&725723529,'()8//7,0(
,163(&7,21)2526%02,6785(&217(17$1'*$3
%(7:((13$1(/6%<$48$/,),('522),1*
,163(&7,21),50$33529('%<7+(2:1(5$1'7+(
26%0$18)$&785(5,163(&7,21),5072%(216,7(
35,2572&200(1&,1*$1<%8,/783522),1*:25.
*(1(5$/&2175$&725723529,'()25&217,18286
522),1*,163(&7,21%<$1,5&522),1*
&2168/7$1725$1(48$/$33529('%<7+(2:1(5
:+(15(48,5('%<7,7/(
6((0(&+$1,&$/
'5$:,1*6
7+(522),1*&$36+((729(5$//
&21',7,21('63$&(66+$//+$9($0,1,080<($5
$*('62/$55()/(&7$1&((48$/7225*5($7(5
7+$1$1'$165,(48$/7225*5($7(57+$1

&22/522)

$//68%385/,1+$1*(566+$//%(=0$;75,3/(
=,1&&2$7('%<6,0362125(48$/
3529,'($522)723+26(%,%1($57+(2)),&(25
)8785(2)),&($5($6((3/$1)25/2&$7,21
2)),&($5($%(/2:
&85%02817('6.</,*+7
6.</,*+7602.(+$7&+127(67+,6
6+((7)25$'',7,21$/,1)250$7,21
62/$55($'<522)$5($6((
62/$55($'<522)127(67+,6
6+((7)25$'',7,21$/
,1)250$7,21
,17(5,25522)$1'29(5)/2:
'5$,16,1522)68036(($'
,17(5,25522)'5$,1,1522)
6803Z(;7(5,2529(5)/2:
6&833(56(($'
%,/&27<3(6[$/80,180
)5$0(6(/))/$6+,1*522)+$7&+
Z%,/*8$5'6$)(7<5$,/,1*
6<67(0 /$''(5836$)(7<
326725 6(( $')25
7<3,&$/'(7$,/6
(;7(5,25'2:163287Z

29(5)/2:6&833(566(($'
$'
(;7(5,25'2:163287Z

29(5)/2:6&833(56(($'
$'
&85%02817('602.(+$7&+
6.</,*+7602.(+$7&+127(67+,6
6+((7)25$'',7,21$/,1)250$7,21

$$
&&
''
((
))

**
++
--
%%

7<3

7<3

1257+

30
3/$11,1*68%0,77$/
$
:+,775$0$9(
5$1&+2&8&$021*$&$

$
522)3/$1
3$75,273$571(56:+,775$0$9(
.(<127(6
522)3/$1/(*(1'
522)3/$1*(1(5$/127(6
+26(%,%6((3/80%,1*'5$:,1*6

522)$&&(66+$7&+5()(572'(7$,/6$'DQG

/,1(2)522))5$0,1*%(/2:6((6758&785$/
'5$:,1*6)25$',7,21$/,1)250$7,21
:$//3$1(/3$5$3(75(7851:5$3'(&25$7,9(
0(7$/3$1(/$7)855,1*$1'3$5$3(75(78516((
6758&785$/'5$:,1*6)25$'',7,21$/,1)250$7,21
3$,17('&21&5(7(7,/783:$//3$1(/
:$//02817('/,*+7),;785(&(17(5,1:$//3$1(/
8126(((/(&75,&$/'5$:,1*6)25$',7,21$/
,1)250$7,21
727$/522)
$5($
2)522)
$5($5(4)25
23(1,1*6
727$/$5($2)
23(1,1*65(4
180%(52);
81,765(4
6) 6)
727$/23(1,1*65(4%<2:1(5

6.</,*+76
727$/6.</,*+763529,'('

6.</,*+76

*5266
522)
$5($

6.</,*+7
602.(
+$7&+
2)522)
$5($

6.</,*+7
602.(
+$7&+
$5($
1(7
522)
$5($
2)
522)
$5($
$5($
3529,'('
(;&/86,9(
2)

6.</,*+76
6) 6)
6)
6)
6)
62/$55($'<522)127(6

352326('522)3/$1

Page 653 ends

127(6

683(5:+,7(
6725()52170(',803(5)250$1&(
%/8(5()/(&7('*/$=,1*%/$&.
$12',=('08//,21$/7(51$7,1*
&2/25

9,67$&22/3$&,),&$$1'9,67$&22/
237,%/8(
$
%
&
'
127(6

)25*/$66$1'08//,21&2/2566(((;7(5,25
&2/256/(*(1' 127(67+,66+((7
3529,'(7(03(5('*/$66#7+()2//2:,1*

$ $//63$1'5(/6<67(0*/$=,1*,1)52172)
&21&5(7(:$//3$1(/6
% $//*/$=,1*:,7+,12)$1$'-$&(17:$/.,1*
685)$&(
& $//*/$=,1*:,7+2)$1<3257,212)$'225
#63$1'5(/6<67(0*/$=,1*,1)52172)&21&5(7(
:$//3$1(/63529,'(',$9(17,//$7,21+2/(6,1
7+(&21&5(7($0$;2)
2&&2175$&72572
3529,'($60227+),1,6+217+(*/$66)$&,1*
&21&5(7(685)$&(6$1'723$,177+(0,1$&2/25
6(/(&7('%<7+($5&+,7(&7
#63$1'5(/6<67(0*/$=,1*127,1)52172)$
&21&5(7(:$//3$1(/3529,'(7(1&$7(0,5$),1
),/7(5)$%5,&6+$'(&/27+
63$1'5(/6<67(0*/$=,1*

9,67$&22/237,%/8(
)25(;7(5,2563$1'5(/*/$=,1*86(
9,67$&22/%$&.3$,17,1*2)*/$66127
5(48,5('
9,6,216<67(0*/$=,1*
9,67$&22/3$&,),&$
)25(;7(5,259,6,21*/$=,1*86(,168/$7('
*/$66&216,67,1*2)$1287(5/$<(52)
9,67$&22/$1'$1,11(5/$<(52)
62/$5%$1)25,17(5,25*/$=,1*86(
&/($5*/$66
6725()5217)5$0,1*

821#9,6,216<67(00,1[2))6(7
6<67(0821#63$1'5(/6<67(0[
2))6(76<67(06725()52176<67(072%(
'(6,*1%8,/'%<7+(*(1(5$/&2175$&725
'(6,*16+$//&203/<:,7+$//5(/(9$17&2'(
:,1'/2$',1*5(48,5(0(176
9,6,216<67(0*/$=,1*
62/$5&22/62/$5%/8(
)25(;7(5,259,6,21*/$=,1*86(,168/$7('
*/$66&216,67,1*2)$1287(5/$<(52)
9,67$&22/$1'$1,11(5/$<(52)62/$5%$1
)25,17(5,25*/$=,1*86(&/($5*/$66
63$1'5(/6<67(0*/$=,1*

9,67$&22/3$&,),&$
)25(;7(5,2563$1'5(/*/$=,1*86(
9,67$&22/%$&.3$,17,1*2)*/$66127
5(48,5('
.(<127(6
*/$=,1*/(*(1' 127(6
(;7(5,25:$//&2/25/(*(1' 127(6

30
3/$11,1*68%0,77$/
$
:+,775$0$9(
5$1&+2&8&$021*$&$

$
(;7(5,25
(/(9$7,2163$75,273$571(56:+,775$0$9(
3$,17('&21&5(7(7,/783:$//3$1(/
3$1(/-2,17

Page 654 ends

30
3/$11,1*68%0,77$/
$
:+,775$0$9(
5$1&+2&8&$021*$&$

$
&2/25%2$5'3$75,273$571(56:+,775$0$9(
(1/$5*('9,(:#&251(5

Page 655 ends

1 1

Page 656 ends

Page 657 ends

Page 658 ends

Page 659 ends

PROJECT INFORMATION

Page 660 ends

Page 661 ends

Page 662 ends

PROPOSED

BUILDING
86,194 S.F.

OFFICE AREA
2,500 S.F. GROUND LEVEL
2,500 S.F. MEZZANINE LEVEL
14' X 50' TRAILER STALL 14' X 50' TRAILER STALL 14' X 50' TRAILER STALL 14' X 50' TRAILER STALL
14' X 50' TRAILER STALL
14' X 50' TRAILER STALL
14' X 50' TRAILER STALL
14' X 50' TRAILER STALL
14' X 50' TRAILER STALL
GATE
30' FIRE ACCESS LANE
30' FIRE LANE
WHITTRAM AVE.

NO GARDING LINE
30' FIRE ACCESS LANE
T
30' FIRE ACCESS LANE

ELECT ROOM
9 DOCK- HI DOORS

PUBLIC ART
ENCE

NK FENCE
TRUCK

QUEUINSPACE

PROVIDE CHARGING

STATION FOR EACH

TRUCK DOOR

TYPICAL
8 8 6
5 6
8 10
10 DG PATH
DG PAD
FC-1

SITE PHOTOMETRIC
PLAN

PROJECT

SECOND PLANNING SUBMITTAL
A21-2322

RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA
XX.XX.2022
PATRIOT PARTNERS - WHITTRAM AVE.

SITE PHOTOMETRIC 1SCALE: 1"=20'-0"

Page 663 ends

MEMORANDUM
To: Ms. Mena Adbul-Ahad, Assistant Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga From: Patrick Cruz, Project Manager, Dudek
Subject: Categorical Exemption Memorandum – Whittram Avenue Warehouse Project (Design Review DRC2022-00156)
Date: May 2, 2023
Attachments: A – Air Quality Technical Memorandum
B – Biological Resources Technical Memorandum
C – Archaeological Resources Assessment
D – Noise and Vibration Technical Memorandum
E – Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled Screening Analysis Memorandum Introduction
The City of Rancho Cucamonga has received a development application from Patriot Development Partners (Project Applicant) for the Whittram Avenue Warehouse Project (Project). This memorandum describes the Project and discusses how the Project is categorica lly exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). While the Project is exempt from CEQA, technical studies have been prepared to provide substantial evidence demonstrating that the Project would not result in a significant effect on the environment. The technical studies are affixed to this document as Attachments A through E and address air quality, biological resources, noise and vibration, and transportation.

Project Description
The Project involves the construction and operation of one warehouse/distribution building totaling 86,194 square feet on 4.1 acres of a 5.2- acre property located south of Whittram Avenue between Etiwanda Avenue and Hickory Avenue at 13045 Whittram Avenue (Figure 1).

The Project site is comprised of five parcels identified as Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) 0229-162-05, -04, -11, -12, and -13. The majority of the Project site is undeveloped, although two single-family residences are located on the northwest and northeast corners of the Project site. A stormwater drainage facility is located along the western boundary of the site. The Project site has a General Plan Land Use Designation of Neo-Industrial Employment District and a zoning district of Neo-Industrial (NI). The Project site is located i n a primarily industrial area, surrounded by industrial uses and nonconforming uses such as single -family residential uses and truck storage uses.

While the Project site is located on a 5.2-acre property, the Project would only be developed on a 4.1-acre Project site. The remainder of the property, where the existing drainage is located, would be left undisturbed.

Attachment 2

Page 664 ends

MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION MEMORANDUM – WHITTRAM AVENUE WAREHOUSE PROJECT (DESIGN REVIEW DRC2022-00156)

14933 2 MAY 2023
The proposed warehouse building would provide 86,194 square feet of space, inclusive of approximately 2,500 square feet of office space and 2,50 0 square feet of mezzanine space (Figure 2, Site Plan) . The Project would involve associated improvements, including loading docks, truck and vehicle parking, landscaped areas , and an outdoor employee break area. The building would have a maximum building height of 41.5 feet, measured from the finished floor to the top of building parapets along the public frontage (i.e., Whittram Avenue) . The building would have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 0. 486. The Project would include improvements along Whittram Avenue, including frontage landscaping, lighting, and pedestrian improvements. A variety of trees, shrubs, plants, and land covers would be planted within the Project frontage’s landscape setback area, as well as within the landscape areas found around the proposed industrial/warehouse building and throughout the Project site. Access to the site would be provided on Whittram Avenue via a 40 -foot driveway at the north western corner of the site. An additional fire access lane with a 30-foot driveway would be provided on Whittram at the northeastern corner of the site.

A tenant for the proposed industrial warehouse building has not been identified. Notwithstanding, based on the Project Applicant’s experience developing, owning, and operating similar warehouse buildings, business operations would be expected to be conducted within the enclosed building, with the exception of the ingressing an egressing of trucks and passenger vehicles accessing the site, passenger and truck parking, the loading and unloading of trailers within designated truck courts/loading areas, and the internal and external movement of materials around the Project site via forklifts, pallet jacks, yard hostlers, and similar equipment. While operational hours are anticipated to follow common working hours (e.g., 8 -12 hours per day), it is assumed that the facility could be operated 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Cold or refrigerated storage would not be permitted in the proposed building. Should cold or refrigerated storage be required in the future, the addition of such space would be subject to additional environmental review and approval by the City.

Approach to CEQA Compliance
Per Section 15061(b)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, a project may be exempt from CEQA if the project is exempt pursuant to a categorical exemption and the application of that categorical exemption is not barred by one of the exceptions set forth in Section 15300.2. Section 15300 of the CEQA Guidelines provides a list of classes of projects which the Secretary of the Resources Age ncy has determined do not usually have a significant effect on the environment, and therefore, are declared to be categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of further environmental documents. Based on a review and analysis of the Project site plans, existing conditions, and land use regulations applicable to the Project Site, the Project would meet the requirements of a Class 32 categorical exemption (pursuant to Section 15332 of the state CEQA Guidelines), and therefore, is exempt from CEQA, as detailed further below.

Applicability of a Categorical Exemption
Sections 15300 to 15333 of the CEQA Guidelines provide classes of projects that have been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment and that are exempt from further CEQA requirements. Based on a review of the Project details and technical studies prepared for the Project, the following exemption applies to the Project.
▪ 15332. In-Fill Development Projects . Class 32 consists of projects characterized as in -fill development meeting the conditions described as follows:

Page 665 ends

MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION MEMORANDUM – WHITTRAM AVENUE WAREHOUSE PROJECT (DESIGN REVIEW DRC2022-00156)

14933 3 MAY 2023
- (a) The project is c onsistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designations and regulations. - (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five ac res substantially surrounded by urban uses.
- (c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species. - (d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality.
- (e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.

These conditions are discussed further below.
(a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations.

Response: According to the City’s General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, the Project Site located within the Neo-Industrial Employment District and is zoned Neo -Industrial (NI). According to th e City’s General Plan Land Use and Community Character Section, the Neo-Industrial Employment District is intended to provide for primarily light industrial uses, including incubator spaces and small warehouses. Permitted uses under the Project Site’s NI zoning include research and development uses, context sensitive warehousing, and distribution and manufacturing.

The Project involves the development of one warehouse building approximately 86,194 square feet in size, inclusive of office and mezzanine space, as well as associated improvements such as on-site landscaping and surface parking. At approximately 86,194 square feet, the proposed warehouse space is intended to support a variety of potential light industrial uses, including research a nd development, limited manufacturing and assembly, limited distribution uses, and traditional warehousing for smaller business operations. As such, the proposed use would be consistent with the aforementioned purpose of the Neo- Industrial Employment District General Plan designation to support light industrial and small warehousing uses. Furthermore, pursuant to Table 17.30.030-1 of the Municipal Code, “Wholesale and Distribution – Light” is a permitted use within the NI zone. Thus, operation of the Projec t would be consistent with the current zoning. Additionally, the Project has been designed to meet the standards and guidelines of the Development Code for the NI zone. The Project does not involve any features that are inconsistent with development standards and no variances, height allowances, setback reductions, or other deviations from the development code are being requested. Thus, the Project would not conflict with the applicable General Plan designation and policies, nor the applicable zoning designation and regulations. (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses.

Response: The Project Site is located south of Whittram Avenue between Etiwanda Avenue and H ickory Avenue at 13045 Whittram Avenue, firmly within the existing boundaries of the City and is surrounded by existing industrial development in all directions. The Project site is 4.1 acres. While it is located on a property that is 5.2 acres in size, th e Project would only be constructed on a 4.11 -acre portion of the property due to easements and other constraints. The California courts have clarified that when a project

Page 666 ends

MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION MEMORANDUM – WHITTRAM AVENUE WAREHOUSE PROJECT (DESIGN REVIEW DRC2022-00156)

14933 4 MAY 2023
is located on a property that is larger than 5 acres, but the project itself involves disturbance to less than 5 acres, only the area disturbed by the project should be counted in determining whether the project is less than 5 acres (see Protect Tustin Ranch v. City of Tustin (Costco Wholesale Corporation, Real Party in Interest) (2021). Thus, given that the proposed Project site is 4.1 acres, the Project Site represents an infill, less-than 5-acre parcel, located within an urbanized area. (c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species.

Response: The Project Site is located in a developed part of the City and is surrounded by an urbanized mix of land uses. The Project Site features disturbed land with existing residential uses. As a result of this existing development and previous levels of distu rbance, vegetation on the Project Site is limited to disturbed habitat and ornamental landscape trees and vegetation as documented in the Biological Resources Report (Attachment B). The ornamental trees and vegetation form a non -cohesive plant community that is not known to support any candidate, sensitive, or special -status plant species. Based on specific habitat requirements, no significant biological resources can reasonably be expected to occur on the Project Site.
(d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality.

Response: The Project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality.

Air Quality
According to the Air Quality Assessment (Attachment B) prepared for the Project, emissions generated during construction and operation of the Project would not exceed South Coast Air Quality Management District’s (SCAQMD’s) significance thresholds. Similarly, the emissions would also not exceed the localized significant thresholds , carbon monoxide hotspot , or toxic air contaminant significance thresholds for sensitive receptors during construction. Health risk assessments for construction and operation of the Project were prepared as part of the Air Quality Assessment. In both cases, it was determined that the Project would not exce ed screening levels established by the California O ffice of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. Thus, the Project would result in a less than significant impact related to both localized and regional air quality.

Noise
According to the Noise and Vibration Analysis Report prepared for the Project (Attachment C), Project construction noise would not rise to levels that would affect sensitive receptors and would on the whole, be less noisy than existing outdoor noise levels . In addition, operational noise of the Project would be consistent with similar warehouse and light industrial use and would not exceed applicable noise thresholds. Thus, the Project’s noise impacts would be less than significant.

Page 667 ends

MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION MEMORANDUM – WHITTRAM AVENUE WAREHOUSE PROJECT (DESIGN REVIEW DRC2022-00156)

14933 5 MAY 2023
Transportation
The Trip Generation Analysis and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Analysis prepared for the Project (Attachment D) estimated that the Project would generate 148 daily trips (or 218 passenger vehicle equivalent trips), with 21 AM peak hour trips and 23 PM peak hour trips occurring on a typical weekday.

The Project would generate a low number of daily traffic and peak hour trips and would not cause a measurable operational effect on local roadways. In addition, the Project would not generate 250 or more new daily trips (both for actual vehicles and passenger car equivalent vehicles) . As such, per the City’s Transportation Impact Assessment Guidelines, the Project is presumed to have a less than significant impact with regard to VMT.

Therefore, based on the above information, the Project would result in a less than significant impact related to transportation.

Water Quality
Project construction would incorporate standard best management practices (BMPs) to reduce potential wind and water erosion during grading activities and to prevent the potential discharge of pollutants into receiving waters. Further, the Project will be required to comply with sections of the City’s Municipal Code that set forth regulations to protect and enhance the quality of watercourses, water bodies, and wetlands within the City in a manner consistent with the federal Clean Water Act, the California Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, and the municipal NPDES permit. Applicable sections of the Municipal Code include Section 19.20 of the City’s Municipal Code, which outlines the requirements of the “City of Rancho Cucamonga Storm Water and Urban Runoff Management and Discharge Control Ordinance,” and Section

17.56, which, among other things, establishes minimum landscape requirements t o control soil erosion and to prevent excessive irrigation. The Project includes an engineered stormwater drainage system designed consistent with these requirements, as well as those set forth in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the Project. The City will review and approve the Water Quality Management Plan prior to the issuance of building permits to ensure that the Project’s storm water drainage system will comply with the Multiple Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit requirements. As a result, the Project’s water quality impacts would be less than significant.
(e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.

Response: The Project Site is already within the service area of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (RCFPD) and the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department (RCPD). The Project would not directly or indirectly result in an increase in populations, and thus, would not increase demand for additional public services. Given the nature of warehouse building, the Project is not anticipated to generate a substantial amount of wastewater or result in substantial water usage. In addition, the Project Site is located in a developed portion of the City, and existing uses on site are already serv ed by utilities, including domestic and fire water, electricity, telecommunication lines, and natural gas . With regard to wastewater, development in the Project area typically connects to on -site septic systems. The Project would take a similar approach, w here an underground septic tank would treat the limited wastewater generated the Project. The septic tank would be subject to the permitting requirements of the San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health Services, which sets forth requirement s for the siting and

Page 668 ends

MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION MEMORANDUM – WHITTRAM AVENUE WAREHOUSE PROJECT (DESIGN REVIEW DRC2022-00156)

14933 6 MAY 2023
construction of private septic systems. Prior to issuance of a Sanitation Permit, the San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health Services will review the proposed septic system to ensure it is sufficiently sized and meets applicable development standards. As such, no connection to the public sanitary sewer system is required. Thus, the Project can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services necessary for Project implementation.

Exceptions to a Categorical Exemption
Section 15300.2 of the CEQA Guidelines provides several exceptions that would otherwise preclude the use of a Categorical Exemption. The exceptions to the exemptions are provided below. As discussed and elaborated upon, the exceptions would not apply to the Project.
▪ 15300.2. Exceptions
o (a) Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where a project is to be located – a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply all instances, except where the project may impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and off icially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies.

Response: The Project qualifies for a Class 32 exemption; Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 do not apply to the Project. Thus, this exception does not apply.
o (b) Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant.

Response: Both Project construction and operations could result in incremental environmental effects that are not considered significant; however, as with any environmental impact, when combined with impacts related to the implementation of other related projects located throughout the broader geographic area, there is always potential—albeit remote—for the Project to contribute to cumulative impacts.

Notwithstanding, due to the relatively minor scope of the Project and mandatory adherence with all applicable federal, state and local laws, regulations and guidelines, any incremental, individual-level im pact resulting from Project construction and operations would remain less than significant and would not constitute a considerable contribution to potential regional cumulative impacts in the greater Project region. Additionally, all other related projects would presumably be required by the applicable lead agency to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local regulatory requirements and incorporate all feasible mitigation measures to further ensure that their potentially cumulative impacts would r emain at less -than-significant levels. Thus, this exception does not apply.
o (c) Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances.

Page 669 ends

MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION MEMORANDUM – WHITTRAM AVENUE WAREHOUSE PROJECT (DESIGN REVIEW DRC2022-00156)

14933 7 MAY 2023
Response: Operation of the Project does not represent a new or unique use or activity that does not already occur in the City and throughout the broader Project area. Additionally, there is no evidence of unique cond itions (e.g., unique geotechnical characteristics that would result in impacts to either the Project or adjacent land uses), either on site or within the Project area, and no unusual circumstances have been identified by the City, other agencies, or local stakeholders.

The Project site’s immediate area has similar General Plan and zoning designations as the subject property. The Project is not expected to be affected by unusual circumstances or otherwise unforeseen conditions. Thus, this exception does not apply. o (d) Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officiall y designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified EIR.

Response: According to the California Department of Transportation, the nearest “Officially Designated State Scenic Highway” to the Project Site is a 16-mile portion of SR-38 from South Fork Campground to State Lane, approximately 43 miles east of the Project site.1 Thus, this exception does not apply.
o (e) Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code.

Response: The provisions in California Government Code Section 65962.5 are commonly referred to as the “Cortese List” (after the legislator who authored the legislation that enacted it). The list, or a site’s presence on the list, has bearing on the local permitting process as well as on compliance with CEQA. The California Department of Toxic Substances Control’s EnviroStor and the State Water Resources Control Board’s GeoTracker online databases are commonly searched to determine the presence or absence of hazardous materials sites included on the Cortese List.

A review of both GeoTracker2 and EnviroStor3 concluded that no hazardous material sites with an “open” cleanup case are located on the Project Site or on adjacent properties to the Project Site.

Because the Project Site itself has no open or historical cases and is not expected to be affected by potential contamination, this exception does not apply. o (f) Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource.

Response: As defined by the CEQA Guidelines (14 CCR 15000 et seq.), a “historical resource” is considered to be a resource that is listed in or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) or California Register of Historical Resources (CR HR), has been identified as significant in a historical resource survey, or is listed on a local register of historical resources. 1 California Department of Transportation. 2022. “Officially Designated State Scenic Highways and Historic Parkways.” Accessed December 2022.
https://caltrans.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=465dfd3d807c46cc8e8057116f1aacaa 2 GeoTracker. 2022. GeoTracker Database. Accessed December 2022. https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?CMD=runreport&myaddress=Search+GeoTracker. 3 EnviroStor. 2022. EnviroStor Database. Accessed December 2022. https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/map/?myaddress=Search.

Page 670 ends

MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION MEMORANDUM – WHITTRAM AVENUE WAREHOUSE PROJECT (DESIGN REVIEW DRC2022-00156)

14933 8 MAY 2023
Under CEQA, a project may have a significant effect on the environment if it may cause “a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource” (Public Resources Code Section 21084.1; 14 CCR 15064.5(b)). If a site is listed or eligible for listing in the CRHR, or included in a local register of historic resources, or identified as significant in a historical resources survey (meeting the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1(q)), it is a historical resource and is presumed to be historically or culturally significant for the purposes of CEQA (Public Resources Code Section 21084.1; 14 CCR 15064.5 (a)).

An Archaeological Resources Assessment (Attachment D) was prepared for the Project site and included a records search of the California Historical Resources Information System, archival research, and an intensive-level pedestrian survey by a qualified archaeologist. The results of the Cultural Resources Assessment concluded that no cultural resources were identified within the proposed Project site and the potential to encounter previously unidentified cultural resources is low.

Nonetheless, in the unlikely event that ground disturbing construction activities uncover cultural resources, the Project would be subject to a standard condition of approval by the City that would require the Applicant to appropriately handle and evaluate the find. The condit ion of approval would require that work in the affected area cease immediately and a qualified person (meeting the Secretary of the Interior's standards (36CFR61)) be consulted by the Applicant to evaluate the find, and as appropriate recommend alternative measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate negative effects on the resource.

Additionally, the Project site does not contain any built structures which could be considered historic resources, based primarily on the fact that the existing on -site structure s how evidence of heavy alteration over the years, and thus, lack their original architectural integrity, a key component in determining whether an older structure can be eligible for listing as a historic resource.

Based on this information, the Project would not result in a substantial adverse change to the significance of a historic resource, and this exception does not apply to the Project.

Conclusion
Based upon the information outlined above and the conclusions of the technical analyses prepared for the Project, no substantial direct or indirect environmental impacts are anticipated to occur as a result of the Project .

Additionally, given the Project characteristics, the Project is categorically exempt from CEQA under the Class 32 Categorical Exemption. As such, no further environmental analysis under CEQA is warranted.

Page 671 ends

Page 672 ends

Project Site Plan
13045 Whittram Avenue Warehouse
FIGURE 2
Path: Z:\Projects\j1493301\MAPDOC\DOCUMENT\Noise\Figure 2 Project Site Plan.aio SOURCE: Herdman Architecture and Design, 2022.

Page 673 ends

Attachment A
Air Quality Technical Memorandum

Page 674 ends

MEMORANDUM
To: Air Quality Technical Memorandum
From: David Larocca, Air Quality Specialist, Dudek
Subject: 13045 Whittram Avenue Warehouse Project Air Quality Technical Memorandum Date: December 21, 2022
cc: Patrick Cruz (Dudek)
Attachment(s): Attachment A – CalEEMod Emissions Outputs and Health Risk Assessment Files

1 Introduction and Purpose
The purpose of this memorandum is to estimate criteria air pollutant emissions from construction and operation of the Whittram Warehouse Project (Project) located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (City), and evaluate potential air quality impacts resulting from Project implementation under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

This memorandum is intended to support a Class 32 CEQA exemption for the Project. The Class 32 CEQA exemption consists of Projects characterized as in-fill development meeting the following conditions (emphasis added):
a) The Project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a Project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses.
c) The Project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. d) Approval of the Project would not result in any si gnificant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality.
e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.

The Class 32 exemption may be used where above -noted conditions (a) through (e) are fulfilled, where it can be seen with certainty that the proposed Project could not have a significant effect on the environment. Of relevance, the focus is on air quality impacts and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as therefore not evaluated herein.

The contents and organization of this memorandum are as follows: (2) project description; (3) background; (4) thresholds of significance; (5) approach and methodology; (6) air quality impact assessment; (7) conclusions; and (8) references cited.

Page 675 ends

WHITTRAM AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

14933 2 DECEMBER 2022
2 Project Description
The project would include construction of a warehouse building of approximately 86,1941 square feet (inclusive of all office and mezzanine space) located on the south side of Whittram Avenue, situated between Etiwanda Avenue on the east, and Hickory Avenue on the west in the City. Regional access to the project area is provided by State Route (SR) 66 to the north, Interstate (I -) 10 to the south, and I -15 to the west. Local access to the project site is provided by Whittram Avenue. All operational cargo handling equipment are electric powered as part of the project design.
3 Background
The Project site is located within the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) and is within the jurisdictional boundaries of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), which has jurisdiction over the City of Rancho Cucamonga, where the Project is located.

Criteria air pollutants are defined as pollutants for which the federal and state governments have established ambient air quality standards, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations to protect public health. Criteria air pollutants that are evaluated include volatile organic compounds (VOCs; also referred to as reactive organic gases [ROGs]), oxides of nitrogen (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur oxides (SOx), particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to 10 microns in size (coarse particulate matter, or PM 10), and particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to 2.5 microns in size (fine particulate matter, or PM 2.5). VOCs and NOx are important because they are precursors to ozone (O3). Criteria air pollutant emissions associated with construction of the Project were estimated for the following emission sources: operation of off-road construction equipment, paving, architectural coating, on-road vendor (material delivery) trucks, and worker vehicles. The operational criteria air pollutant emissions were estimated from area sources, energy sources, and mobile sources.

Regarding National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) attainment status,2 the SCAB is designated as a nonattainment area for federal and state O3 standards, and federal and state PM2.5 standards (CARB 2020; EPA 2022). The SCAB is designated as a nonattainment area for state PM10 standards; however, it is designated as an attainment area for federal PM10 standards. The SCAB is designated as an attainment area for federal and state CO standards, federal and state NO2 standards, and state SO2 standards.

1 An earlier version of the site plan involved 86,392-square feet of development (approximately 198 square feet larger than the current site plan). Because the technical analyses and modeling had already been completed at the time that this project change was made, the technical analysis within this environmental documentation analyzes the development of the original, 86,392- square foot project. Given the nominal change in square-footage, no updates to the project’s technical analysis were conducted, as any changes would have a less than appreciable effect on outputs. Moreover, given that the change constitutes a decrease in square footage, usage of the original project square footage results in a conservative analysis (i.e., a smaller project would result in a slightly less impactful project).
2 An area is designated as in attainment when it is in compliance with the NAAQS and/or the CAAQS. These standards are set by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and California Air Resources Board (CARB), respectively, for the maximum level of a given air pollutant that can exist in the outdoor air without unacceptable effects on human health or the public welfare. Attainment = meets the standards; attainment/maintenance = achieve the standards after a nonattainment designation; nonattainment = does not meet the standards.

Page 676 ends

WHITTRAM AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

14933 3 DECEMBER 2022
Although the SCAB has been designated as nonattainment for the federal rolling 3-month average lead standard, it is designated attainment for the state lead standard.3 4 Thresholds of Significance
The significance criteria used to evaluate Project impacts to air quality are based on the recommendations provided in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines (14 CCR 15000 et seq.), as follows:

A. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan B. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the Project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard C. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations D. Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affec ting a substantial number of people
Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines indicates that, where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district or pollution control district may be relied upon to determine whether the Project would have a significant impact on air quality. The SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook (SCAQMD 1993), as revised in March 2015, sets forth quantitative emission significance thresholds below which a Project would not have a significant impact on ambient air quality (SCAQMD 201 9). Project-related air quality impacts under Impact B would be considered significant if any of the applicable significance thresholds presented in Table 1, SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds, are exceeded.

The emission-based thresholds for O3 (VOC or NOx) precursors are intended to serve as a surrogate for an “ozone significance threshold” (i.e., the potential for adverse O 3 impacts to occur) because O 3 itself is not emitted directly, and the effects of an ind ividual Project’s emissions of O 3 precursors (VOC and NO x) on O 3 levels in ambient air cannot be determined through air quality models or other quantitative methods.

Table 1. SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants Mass Daily Thresholds
Pollutant Construction (Pounds per Day) Operation (Pounds per Day) VOCs 75 55
NOx 100 55
CO 550 550
SOx 150 150
PM10 150 150
PM2.5 55 55
Leada 3 3

3 The phaseout of leaded gasoline started in 1976. Since gasoline no longer contains lead, the Project is not anticipated to result in impacts related to lead; therefore, it is not discussed in this analysis.

Page 677 ends

WHITTRAM AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

14933 4 DECEMBER 2022
Table 1. SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants Mass Daily Thresholds
Pollutant Construction (Pounds per Day) Operation (Pounds per Day) TACs and Odor Thresholds
TACsb Maximum incremental cancer risk  10 in 1 million Cancer Burden > 0.5 excess cancer cases (in areas  1 in 1 million) Chronic and acute hazard index  1.0 (Project increment) Odor Project creates an odor nuisance pursuant to SCAQMD Rule 402 Ambient Air Quality Standards for Criteria Pollutants c

NO2 1-hour average
NO2 annual
arithmetic mean
SCAQMD is in attainment; Project is significant if it causes or contributes to an exceedance of the following attainment standards:

0.18 ppm (state)

0.030 ppm (state) and 0.0534 ppm (federal)

CO 1-hour average
CO 8-hour average
SCAQMD is in attainment; Project is significant if it causes or contributes to an exceedance of the following attainment standards:
20 ppm (state) and 35 ppm (federal)

9.0 ppm (state /federal)
PM10 24-hour
average

PM10 annual
average

10.4 g/m3 (construction)d

2.5 g/m3 (operation)

1.0 g/m3
PM2.5 24-hour
average

10.4 g/m3 (construction)d

2.5 g/m3 (operation)
Source: SCAQMD 2019.

Notes: SCAQMD = South Coast Air Quality Management District; VOCs = volatile organic compounds; NOx = oxides of nitrogen; CO = carbon monoxide; SOx = sulfur oxides; PM10 = coarse particulate matter; PM2.5 = fine particulate matter; TAC = toxic air contaminant; NO2 = nitrogen dioxide; ppm = parts per million; g/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter.

GHG emissions thresholds for industrial proposed Projects, as added in the March 2015 revision to the SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds, were not include included in Table 1 as they will be addressed within the GHG emissions analysis and not the air quality study.
a The phaseout of leaded gasoline started in 1976. Since gasoline no longer contains lead, the Project is not anticipated to result in impacts related to lead; therefore, it is not discussed in this analysis. b TACs include carcinogens and non-carcinogens.
c Ambient air quality standards for criteria pollutants are based on SCAQMD Rule 1303, Table A-2, unless otherwise stated. d Ambient air quality threshold are based on SCAQMD Rule 403.

In addition to the emission-based thresholds listed in Table 1, SCAQMD also recommends the evaluation of localized air quality impacts to sensitive receptors in the immediate vicinity of the Project as a result of construction activities. Such an evaluation is referred to as a localized significance threshold (LST) analysis. The LST analysis focuses on construction equipment and does not include mobile sources. Therefore, the LST analysis only applies to the construction equipment on site, not the worker vehicles or vendor trucks. For Project sites of 5 acres or less, the SCAQMD LST Methodology (2009) includes lookup tables that can be used to determine the maximum allowable daily emissions that would satisfy the localized significance criteria (i.e., the emissions would not cause an exceedance of the applicable concentration limits for NO2, CO, PM10, and PM2.5) without performing Project-specific dispersion modeling. The Project would disturb less than 5 acres per day, so it is appropriate to use the lookup tables for the LST evaluation.

Page 678 ends

WHITTRAM AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

14933 5 DECEMBER 2022
The LST significance thresholds for NO 2 and CO represent the allowable incre ase in concentrations above background levels in the vicinity of a Project that would not cause or contribute to an exceedance of the relevant ambient air quality standards, while the threshold for PM 10 represents compliance with Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust).

The LST significance threshold for PM 2.5 is intended to ensure that construction emissions do not contribute substantially to existing exceedances of the PM 2.5 ambient air quality standards. The allowable emission rates depend on the following parameters:
▪ Source-receptor area (SRA) in which the Project is located ▪ Size of the Project site
▪ Distance between the Project site and the nearest sensitive receptor (e.g., residences, schools, hospitals) The Project site is located in SRA 34 (Central San Bernardino Valley). LST pollutant screening level concentration data is currently published for 1-, 2-, and 5-acre sites for varying distances. In accordance with the SCAQMD Fact Sheet for Applying CalEEMod to Localized Significance Thresholds , the Project would disturb a maximum of 3.5- acres per day during the Site Preparation phase. The nearest sensitive-receptor land use are residences located approximately 354 feet (108 meters) north of the Project site boundary. As such, the LST receptor distance w as assumed to be 100 meters. The LST values from the SCAQMD lookup tables for SRA 34 (Central San Bernardino Valley) were interpolated from 2-acre and 5-acre data and a receptor distance of 100 meters are shown in Table

2. Table 2. Localized Significance Thresholds for Source-Receptor Area 33 (Southwest San Bernardino Valley)
Pollutant Threshold (pounds/day)
Construction
NO2 321
CO 3,440
PM10 54
PM2.5 15
Operation
NO2 321
CO 3,440
PM10 13
PM2.5 4
Source: SCAQMD 2009.

Notes: NO2 = nitrogen dioxide; CO = carbon monoxide; PM10 = coarse particulate matter; PM2.5 = fine particulate matter Localized significance thresholds were determined based on the values for a 3.5-acre site at a distance of 100 meters from the nearest sensitive receptor.
5 Approach and Methodology

5.1 Construction
The California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Version 20 20.4.0 was used to estimate emissions from construction of the Project (California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAP COA) 2021). CalEEMod is a

Page 679 ends

WHITTRAM AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

14933 6 DECEMBER 2022
statewide computer model developed in cooperation with air districts throughout the state to quantify criteria air pollutant and GHG emissions associated with construction activities and operation of a variety of land use Projects, such as residential, commercial, and industrial facilities. CalEEMod input parameters, including the land use type used to represent the Project and its size, construction schedule, and anticipated use of construction equipment, were based on information provided by the applicant or default model assumptions when Project specifics were unavailable. Construction was assumed to commence in June 2023 and last approximately 11 months. The first year of operation was assumed to be 2024. For the analysis, it was assumed that heavy construction equipment would be operating at the site for up to 8 hours per day (depending on phase) , 5 days per week (22 days per month), during the duration of Project construction. In addition to construction equipment operation, emissions from worker trips and vendor trucks (i.e., delivery trucks) were estimated based on CalEEMod defaults. The Project is expected to have 16,457 cubic yards of cut and 33,460 cubic yards of fill during the grading phase, which results in a net import of 17,003 cubic yards of material. Demoltiion of exiting facilities would include approximately 4,000 square feet of buildings and 29,767 square feet of pavement.

The construction equipment mix and esti mated hours of equipment operation per day used for the air emissions modeling of the Project are based on CalEEMod defaults and are shown in Table 3. Additional details regarding construction assumptions are provided in the modeling output, Attachment A.

Table 3. Construction Scenario Assumptions
Construction
Phase
One -Way Vehicle Trips Equipment
Average
Daily
Worker
Trips
Average
Daily Vendor
Truck Trips
Total Haul
Truck
Trips Equipment Type Quantity
Daily
Usage
Hours
Demolition 16 4 140
Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8
Excavators 3 8
Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8
Site Preparation 18 4 0 Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8
Grading 16 4 2,126 Excavators 1 8
Graders 1 8
Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8
Building
Construction
76 30 0 Cranes 1 7
Forklifts 3 8
Generator Sets 1 8
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7
Welders 1 8
Paving
20 0 0 Pavers 1 8
Cement and Mortar Mixers 2 6
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8
Paving Equipment 2 6
Rollers 2 6
Architectural
Coating 16 0 0 Air Compressors 1 6

Page 680 ends

WHITTRAM AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

14933 7 DECEMBER 2022
Notes: See Attachment A for details.

Health Risk Assessment
A health risk assessment (HRA) was performed to evaluate potential health risk associated with toxic air contaminants (TACs) from construction on sensitive receptors proximate to the Project site. The greatest potential for TAC emissions during Project construction would be diesel part iculate matter (DPM) from use of heavy equipment and heavy -duty trucks. The closest sensitive receptors to the Project are residences 354 feet to the north; the presence of residences within this range necessitates a construction HRA.

A substance is consid ered toxic if it has the potential to cause adverse health effects in humans, including increasing the risk of cancer upon exposure, or acute (immediate) and/or chronic (cumulative) non -cancer health effects. A toxic substance released into the air is considered a toxic air contaminant (TAC). Adverse health effects associated with exposure to TACs may include carcinogenic (i.e., cancer -causing) and noncarcinogenic effects.

Noncarcinogenic effects typically affect one or more target organ systems and may be experienced on either short- term (acute) or long-term (chronic) exposure to a given TAC.

TACs are identified by federal and state agencies based on a review of available scientific evidence. In the state of California, TACs are identified through a two -step process that was established in 1983 under the Toxic Air Contaminant Identification and Control Act. This two-step process of risk identification and risk management and reduction was designed to protect residents from the health effects of toxic substances in the air. In addition, the California Air Toxics “Hot Spots” Information and Assessment Act, Assembly Bill (AB) 2588, was enacted by the legislature in 1987 to address public concern over the release of TACs into the atmosphere.

Examples include certain aromatic and chlorinated hydrocarbons, certain metals, and asbestos. TACs are generated by a number of sources, including stationary sources, such as dry cleaners, gas stations, combustion sources, and laboratories; mobile sources, such as automobiles; and area sources, such as landfills. Adverse health effects associated with exposure to TACs may include carcinogenic (i.e., cancer -causing) and noncarcinogenic effects. Noncarcinogenic effects typically affect one or more target organ systems and may be experienced on either short-term (acute) or long-term (chronic) exposure to a given TAC.

The most recent guidance from the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) is the 2015 Risk Assessment Guidelines Manual (OEHHA 20 15). Cancer risk parameters, such as age -sensitivity factors, daily breathing rates, exposure period, fraction of time at home, and cancer potency factors were based on the values and data recommended by OEHHA as implemented in Hotspots Analysis and Reporting Program Version 2 (HARP2).

SCAQMD’s Modeling Guidance for American Meteorological Society/Environmental Protection Agency Regulatory Model (AERMOD) (SCAQMD 2022), Health Risk Assessment Guidance for Analyzing Cancer Risks from Mobile Source Diesel Idling Emissions for CEQA Air Quality Analysis (SCAQMD 2003 b), and Risk Assessment Procedures for Rules 1401, 1401.1, and 212 (SCAQMD 2017b) provide guidance to perform dispersion modeling for use in HRAs within the SCAB.

Dispersion of DPM emissions was modeled using AERMOD, which is the model SCAQMD requires for atmospheric dispersion of emissions. AERMOD is a steady-state Gaussian plume model that incorporates air dispersion based on planetary boundary layer turbulence structure and scaling concepts, including treatment of surface and elevated sources, building downwash, and simple and complex terrain. For the proposed Project, AERMOD was run with all sources emitting unit emissions (1 gram per second) to obtain the “Χ/Q” values. Χ/Q is a dispersion factor tha t is the average effluent concentration normalized by source strength and is used as a way to simplify the representation of emissions from many sources. The Χ/Q values of ground -level concentrations were determined

Page 681 ends

WHITTRAM AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

14933 8 DECEMBER 2022
for construction emissions using AERMOD and the maximum concentrations determined for the 1-hour and period averaging periods. Principal parameters of the dispersion modeling are presented in Table 4. Additional details regarding HRA assumptions are provided in the modeling output, Table 4. AERMOD Principal Parameters
Parameter Details
Meteorological Data AERMOD-specific meteorological data for the Ontario Airport air monitoring station (KONT) was used for the dispersion modeling (SCAQMD 2021). A 5-year meteorological data set from 2012 through 2016 was obtained from the SCAQMD in a preprocessed format suitable for use in AERMOD.

Urban versus Rural
Option
Urban dispersion option was selected due to the developed nature of the Project area and per SCAQMD guidelines.

Terrain
Characteristics
Digital elevation model files were imported into AERMOD so that complex terrain features were evaluated as appropriate. Per SCAQMD guidance, the National Elevation Dataset dataset with resolution of 1 arc-second was used.

Source Release
Characterizations
Air dispersion modeling of DPM emissions was conducted assuming the off-road equipment would operate in accordance with the modeling scenario estimated in CalEEMod (Appendix A). The construction equipment and on-site truck travel DPM emissions were modeled as a line of adjacent volume sources across the Project site to represent Project construction with a release height of 4 meters, plume height of 8 meters, and plume width of 8 meters (EPA 2021a).

Discrete Receptors The HRA evaluates the risk to existing residential receptor located in proximity to the Project. A uniform Cartesian grid with 20-meter spacing was placed over proximate sensitive receptors (residents) to the site as well as descrete receptors on nearby sensitive receptors
Source: See Appendix B.

Dispersion model plotfiles from AERMOD were then imported into CARB’s Hotspots Analysis and Reporting Program Version 2 (HARP2, Version 22118) to determine health risk, which requires peak 1-hour emission rates and annual- averaged emission rates for all pollutants for each modeling source. For the residential health risk, the HRA assumes exposure would start in the third trimester of pregnancy.

Health effects from carcinogenic air toxics are usually described in terms of cancer risk, which is an estimate of the chance that an individual will develop cancer during their lifetime. A cancer risk of 10 in a million indicates that a person has an additional risk of 10 chances in a million (0.001%) of developing cancer during their lifetime as a result of the air pollution scenario being evaluated. Hazard index is an estimate of the likelihood that an individual will experience non -cancer health effects (e.g., cardiovascular, neurological, respiratory, etc.). A chronic hazard index estimates the li kelihood of non -cancer health effects when a person is exposed to a toxic pollutant concentration for a 1 -year period or longer. A hazard index less than 1.0 indicates that people are not likely to experience any non-cancer health effects.

5.2 Operations
Area Sources
CalEEMod was used to estimate operational emissions from area sources, including emissions from consumer product use, architectural coatings, and landscape maintenance equipment. Emissions associated with natural gas

Page 682 ends

WHITTRAM AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

14933 9 DECEMBER 2022
usage in space heating and water heating are calculated in the building energy use module of CalEEMod, as described in the following text.

Consumer products are chemically formulated products used by institutional consumers, including detergents; cleaning compounds; polishes; floor finishes; cosmetics; personal care products; home, lawn, and garden products; disinfectants; sanitizers; aerosol paints; and automotive specialty products. Other paint products, furniture coatings, or architectural coatings are not considered consumer products (CAPCOA 2021). Consumer product VOC emissions were estimated in CalEEMod based on the floor area of buildings and default factor of pounds of VOC per building square foot per day. The CalEEMod default values for consumer products were assumed.

VOC off-gassing emissions result from evaporation of solvents contained in surface coatings such as in paints and primers using during building maintenance. CalEEMod calculates the VOC evaporative emissions from application of surface coatings based on the VOC emission factor, building square footage, assumed fraction of surface area, and reapplication rate. The VOC emission factor is based on the VOC content of the surface coatings, and SCAQMD’s Rule 1113 (Architectural Coatings) governs the VOC cont ent for interior and exterior coatings. The model default reapplication rate of 10% of area per year is assumed. Consistent with CalEEMod defaults for non-residential uses, it is assumed that the surface area for painting equals 2.0 times the floor square footage, with 75% assumed for interior coating and 25% assumed for exterior surface coating (CAPCOA 2021). The CalEEMod defaults of 100 g/L were assumed for non-residential interior, exterior, and parking area coatings.

Landscape maintenance includes fuel combustion emissions from equipment such as lawn mowers, rototillers, shredders/grinders, blowers, trimmers, chainsaws, and hedge trimmers. The emissions associated from landscape equipment use are estimated based on CalEEMod default values for emission f actors (grams per square foot of building space per day) and number of summer days (when landscape maintenance would generally be performed) and winter days.

Energy Sources
CalEEMod default values for energy consumption for each land use were applied for the Project analysis. The energy use from non-residential land uses is calculated in CalEEMod based on the California Commercial End-Use Survey database. Energy use in buildings (both natural gas and electricity) is divided by the program into end-use categories subject to Title 24 requirements (end uses associated with the building envelope, such as the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system, water heating system, and integrated lighting) and those not subject to Title 24 requirements (su ch as appliances, electronics, and miscellaneous “plug -in” uses). The CalEEMod assumes compliance with the 2019 Title 24 code.

Mobile Sources
Following the completion of construction activities, the Project would generate criteria pollutant emissions from mobile sources (vehicular traffic) as a result of employees and visitors of the Project. Based on the Dudek Trip Generation, there would be 148 total vehicle trips per day, 41 of which are trucks and 107 are passenger cars.

CalEEMod was used to estimate emissions from proposed vehicular sources (refer to Attachment A). CalEEMod default data, including temperature, trip characteristics, variable start information, and emissions factors, were conservatively used for the model inputs. Two land uses in CalEEMod were used to model emissions from mobile sources. The “unrefrigerated warehouse -rail” land use was used to model trucks and the “unrefrigerated warehouse-no rail” was used to model passenger cars. The trip rates (as stated above) w ere apportioned to each land use from the Transportation Assessment. The fleet mix for trucks was determined based off the

Page 683 ends

WHITTRAM AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

14933 10 DECEMBER 2022
Transportation Assessment and included the following vehicle categories: 2 -axle trucks (50% LHD1 and 50% LHD2), 3 -axle trucks (MHD), and 4 -axle trucks (HHD). The fleet mix for passenger vehicles was assumed consistent with the EMFAC fleet mix for the air basin for the following vehicle categories: LDA, LDT1, LDT2, and MDV. Vehicle trip lengths were assumed to be 40 miles for truck trips (in accordance with SCAQMD guidance) and the CalEEMod defaults for passenger car trips.

Offroad Sources
Based on the type of Project, there are additional emission sources that are either not captured in CalEEMod or specifics are not available to accurately estimate emissions using CalEEMod.

For most of these sources, because specifics are not available to accurately estimate emissions from these anticipated sources under the Project, associated emissions are not included in the estimated emissions presented herein. However, in a good faith effort to include sources typically associated with warehouse/industrial land uses, forklifts and yard trucks are included in the Project’s emission inventory. Methods and assumptions to estimate these sources of emissions are discussed below.

Forklifts
The SCAQMD published a warehouse truck trip study white paper summary of business survey results (SCAQMD Survey), which summarizes various operational results from 34 operating warehouses (SCAQMD 2014). The SCAQMD Survey reported an average of 0.12 forklifts/pallet jacks per 1,000 square feet of building area, which was applied to the proposed Project. Note that this estimate is for total forklifts and pallet jacks while pallet jacks are small as they are primarily used t o lift small loads in tight quarters (and are electric or manual); therefore, assuming all pieces of equipment are forklifts is conservative. The warehouse factor of 0.12 forklifts/pallet jacks per 1,000 square feet of building area was applied for the Project, resulting in a total of 10 forklifts. However, all forklifts were assumed to be electric powered and not result in local air pollutants.

Yard Trucks
Industrial warehouse building operation may require cargo handling equipment to move empty containers and empty chassis to and from the various pieces of cargo handling equipment that receive and distribute containers, which is commonly done by yard trucks. Yard trucks, which are also called yard goats, utility tractors, hustlers, yard hostlers, and yard tractors, were reported at the majority of the 34 high cube warehouses in the SCAQMD Survey with an average usage of 3.6 hostlers per million square feet of building area. The 3.6 hostlers per million square feet of building area was applied to the Proposed Project – both warehouse and manufacturing land uses – with the Project totaling one yard truck. Similar to the forklifts, the yard truck is assumed to be electric powered and not result in local air pollutants. 6 Air Quality Impact Assessment

6.1 Would the Project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
The Project site is located within the SCAB, which includes the non -desert portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties and all of Orange County, and is within the jurisdictional boundaries of SCAQMD.

Page 684 ends

WHITTRAM AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

14933 11 DECEMBER 2022
SCAQMD administers SCAB’s Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP), which is a comprehensive document outlining an air pollution control program for attaining all CAAQS and NAAQS. The most recent adopted AQMP for the SCAB is the 2016 AQMP (SCAQMD 2017), which was adopted by SCAQMD’s Governing Board in March 2017. The 2016 AQMP focuses on available, proven, and cost-effective alternatives to traditional strategies while seeking to achieve multiple goals in partnership with other entities seeking to promote reductions in GHGs and toxic risk, as well as efficiencies in energy use, transportation, and goods movement (SCAQMD 2017).

The purpose of a consistency finding with regard to the AQMP is to determine if a Project is consistent with the assumptions and objectives of the regional air quality plans, and if it would interfere with the region ’s ability to comply with federal and state air quality standards. SCAQMD has established criteria for determining consistency with the currently applicable AQMP in Chapter 12, Sections 12.2 and 12.3 of the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook. These criteria are (SCAQMD 1993):
▪ Consistency Criterion No. 1: Whether the Project would result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations, cause or contribute to new violations, or delay timely attainment of the ambient air quality standards or interim emission reductions in the AQMP. ▪ Consistency Criterion No. 2: Whether the Project would exceed the assumptions in the AQMP or increments based on the year of Project buildout and phase.

To address the first criterion, Project-generated criteria air pollutant emissions have been estimated and analyzed for significance and are addressed under Section 3.2.2. Detailed results of this analysis are included in Attachment A, CalEEMod Emissions Outputs. As presented in Section 3.2.2, construction and operation of the Project would not generate criteria air pollutant emissions that exceed SCAQMD’s thresholds.

The second criterion regarding the Project’s potential to exceed the assumptions in the AQMP or increments based on the year of Project buildout and phase is primarily assessed by determining consistency between the Project ’s land use designations and its potential to generate population growth. In general, Projects are considered consistent with, and not in conflict with or obstructing implementation of, the AQMP if the growth in socioeconomic factors is consistent with the underlying regional plans used to develop the AQMP (per Consistency Criterion No. 2 of the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook). SCAQMD primarily uses demographic growth forecasts for various socioeconomic categories (e.g., population, housing, employment by industry) developed by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) for its Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) (SCAG 2016). This document, which is based on general plans for cities and counties in the SCAB, is used by SCAQMD to develop the AQMP emissions inventory (SCAQMD 2017). 4 The SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS and the associated Regional Growth Forecast are generally consistent with the local plans; therefore, the 2016 AQMP is generally consistent with local government plans.

The relevant local plan for the proposed Project is the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, the most recent iteration of which was adopted in 20 21.The City’s General Plan designates the land use of the Project site as

4 Information necessary to produce the emissions inventory for the SCAB is obtained from SCAQMD and oth er governmental agencies, including the California Air Resources Board (CARB), California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), and SCAG.

Each of these agencies is responsible for collecting data (e.g., industry growth factors, socioeconomic projections, travel activity levels, emission factors, emission speciation profile, and emissions) and developing methodologies (e.g., model and demographic forecast improvements) required to generate a comprehensive emissions inventory. SCAG incorporates these data into its Travel Demand Model for estimating/ projecting vehicle miles traveled and driving speeds. SCAG ’s socioeconomic and transportation activities projections in their 2016 RTP/SCS are integrated in the 2016 AQMP (SCAQMD 2017).

Page 685 ends

WHITTRAM AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

14933 12 DECEMBER 2022
Industrial. The Project site is zoned Neo Industrial (NI) which specifically authorizes the use of the property as a storage building for distribution (City of Rancho Cucamonga 2021). The Project is consistent with the existing land use designation and zoning. In addition, the implementation of the Project would not generate an increase in growth demographics that would conflict with existing projections within the region. Accordingly, the Project is consistent with the SCAG RTP/SCS forecasts used in the SCAQMD AQMP development.

In summary, based on the considerations presented for the two criteria, impacts relating to the Project’s potential to conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable AQMP would be less than significant.

6.2 Would the Project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the Project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or
state ambient air quality standard?
Air pollution is largely a cumulative impact. The nonattainment status of regional pollutants is a result of past and present development, and SCAQMD develops and implements plans for future attainment of ambient air quality standards. Based on these considerations, Project-level thresholds of significance for criteria pollutants are relevant in the determination of whether a Project’s individual emissions would have a cumulatively significant impact on air quality. If a Project’s emissions would exceed the SCAQMD significance thresholds, it would be considered to have a cumulatively conside rable contribution. Conversely, Projects that do not exceed the Project-specific thresholds are generally not considered to be cumulatively significant (SCAQMD 2003).

A quantitative analysis was conducted to determine whether the proposed Project might result in emissions of criteria air pollutants that may cause exceedances of the NAAQS or CAAQS, or cumulatively contribute to existing nonattainment of ambient air quality standards. Details of the methods use to estimate emissions are discussion above in Se ction 2, General Analysis and Methodology. The following discussion summarizes the quantitative Project-generated construction emissions and impacts that would result from implementation of the proposed Project. Detailed assumptions and results of this analysis are provided in Appendix A, Air Quality CalEEMod Output Files.

Construction Emissions
Proposed construction activities would result in the temporary addition of pollutants to the local airshed caused by on-site sources (i.e., off-road construction equipment, soil disturbance, and VOC off -gassing) and off-site sources (i.e., on-road vendor trucks, and worker vehicle trips). Construction emissions can vary substantially from day to day, depending on the level of activity; the specific type of operation; and, for particulate matter, the prevailing weather conditions.

As discussed previously, CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0 was used to estimate emissions from construction of the Project. Internal combustion engines used by construction equipment, trucks, and worker vehicles would result in emissions of VOCs, NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5. PM10 and PM2.5 emissions would also be generated by entrained dust, which results from the exposure of earth surfaces to wind from the direct disturbance and movement of soil. The Project would be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 to control dust emissions generated during any dust-generating activities. Standard construction practices that would be employed to reduce fugitive dust emissions include watering of the active dust areas two times per day, with additional watering depending on

Page 686 ends

WHITTRAM AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

14933 13 DECEMBER 2022
weather conditions. The CalE EMod default assumptions were used for estimating fugitive dust emissions from grading on site. The Project would involve application of architectural coating (e.g., paint and other finishes) for painting the interior and exterior of the building as well a s parking lot striping . The contractor is required to procure architectural coatings from a supplier that complies with the requirements of SCAQMD ’s Rule 1113 (Architectural Coatings). Table 5 presents the estimated maximum daily construction emissions generated during construction of the Project. Details of the emission calculations are provided in Attachment A.

Table 5. Estimated Maximum Daily Construction Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions Year
VOC NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5
pounds per day
2023 2.73 48.94 24.37 0.18 10.34 5.77
2024 45.83 14.73 19.26 0.04 1.67 0.87
Maximum 45.83 48.94 24.37 0.18 10.34 5.77
SCAQMD Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No
Notes: VOC = volatile organic compound; NOx = oxides of nitrogen; CO = carbon monoxide; SOx = sulfur oxides; PM10 = coarse particulate matter; PM2.5 = fine particulate matter; SCAQMD = South Coast Air Quality Management District.

Emissions include compliance with SCAQMD Rules 403 and 1113.

See Attachment A for complete results.

As shown in Table 5, the Project construction would not exceed SCAQMD ’s daily thresholds. Therefore, construction impacts associated with criteria air pollutant emissions would be less than significant.

Operational Emissions
Emissions from the operational phase of the Project were estimated using CalEEMod. Operational year 2024 was assumed as it would be the first year following completion of construction. As described in Section 5.2, CalEEMod quantifies the emissions of a gamut of endeavors, including the use of consumer products, surface coatings, and landscape equipment, truck and passenger vehicle trips, electricity and heating use. Table 6 presents the emissions during operation.

Table 6. Estimated Maximum Daily Operation Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions Emissions Source
VOC NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5
Pounds per Day
Area 1.96 <0.01 0.02 0.00 <0.01 <0.01
Energy 0.01 0.05 0.04 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Mobile 0.32 2.89 8.58 0.04 3.50 0.96
Total 2.29 2.94 8.64 0.04 3.50 0.96
SCAQMD Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No
Notes: VOC = volatile organic compound; NOx = oxides of nitrogen; CO = carbon monoxide; SOx = sulfur oxides; PM10 = coarse particulate matter; PM2.5 = fine particulate matter; SCAQMD = South Coast Air Quality Management District.

See Attachment A for complete results. Columns may not add due to rounding.

As shown in Table 6, the Project would not exceed SCAQMD’s significance thresholds during operations. Therefore, operational impacts associated with criteria air pollutant emissions would be less than significant.

Page 687 ends

WHITTRAM AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

14933 14 DECEMBER 2022
Cumulative Impacts
In considering cumulative impacts from the Project, the analysis must specifically evaluate a Project’s contribution to the cumulative increase in pollutants for which the SCAB is designated as nonattainment for the CAAQS and NAAQS. If a Project’s emissions would exceed SCAQMD’s significance thresholds, it would be considered to have a cumulatively considerable contribution to nonattainment status in the SCAB. If a Project does not exceed thresholds and is determi ned to have less than significant Project-specific impacts, it may still contribute to a significant cumulative impact on air quality. The basis for analyzing the Project’s cumulatively considerable contribution is if the Project’s contribution accounts for a significant proportion of the cumulative total emissions (i.e., it represents a “cumulatively considerable contribution” to the cumulative air quality impact) and consistency with SCAQMD’s 2016 AQMP, which addresses cumulative emissions in the SCAB.

The SCAB has been designated as a federal nonattainment area for O3 and PM2.5 and a state nonattainment area for O3, PM10, and PM 2.5. The nonattainment status is the result of cumulative emissions from various sources of air pollutants and their precursors within the SCAB, including motor vehicles, off-road equipment, and commercial and industrial facilities. Construction of the Project would generate VOC and NOx emissions (which are precursors to O3) and emissions of PM10 and PM2.5. As indicated in Tables 5 and 6, Project-generated construction and operational emissions would not exceed SCAQMD’s emission-based significance thresholds for VOC, NOx, CO, SO2, PM10, or PM2.5.

Since criteria pollutant mass emissions impacts shown in Tables 5 and 6 would not be expected to exceed any of the air quality significance thresholds, cumulative air quality impacts would also be expected to be less than significant. SCAQMD cumulative air quality significance thresholds are the same as Project-specific air quality significance thresholds. Therefore, potential adverse impacts from implementing the proposed Project would not be “cumulatively considerable” as defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15064(h)(1) for air quality impacts. Per CEQA Guidelines Section 15064(h)(4), the mere existence of si gnificant cumulative impacts caused by other Projects alone shall not constitute substantial evidence that the proposed Project’s incremental effects are cumulatively considerable.

The SCAQMD’s guidance on addressing cumulative impacts for air quality is a s follows: “As Lead Agency, the SCAQMD uses the same significance thresholds for Project specific and cumulative impacts for all environmental topics analyzed in an Environmental Assessment or EIR.” Furthermore, “[p]rojects that exceed the Project-specific significance thresholds are considered by the SCAQMD to be cumulatively considerable. This is the reason Project- specific and cumulative significance thresholds are the same. Conversely, Projects that do not exceed the Project- specific thresholds are generally not considered to be cumulatively significant.”5 Based on the previous considerations, the Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable increase in emissions of nonattainment pollutants, and cumulative impacts would be less than significa nt.

5 South Coast AQMD Cumulative Impacts Working Group White Paper on Potential Control Strategies to Address Cumulative Impacts From Air Pollution, August 2003, Appendix D, Cumulative Impact Analysis Requirements Pursuant to CEQA, at D -3. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/Agendas/Environmental-Justice/cumulative-impacts-working- group/cumulativeimpacts-white-paper-appendix.pdf.

Page 688 ends

WHITTRAM AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

14933 15 DECEMBER 2022

6.3 Would the Project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?
Localized Significance Thresholds
Sensitive receptors are those individuals more susceptible to the effects of air pollution than the population at large. People most likely to be affected by air pollution include children, the elderly, and people with cardiovascular and chronic respiratory diseases. According to SCAQMD , sensitiv e receptors include residences, schools, playgrounds, childcare centers, long -term healthcare facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, and retirement homes (SCAQMD 1993). The nearest sensitive-receptor land use are residences across the street to the north of the Project site, within 354 feet.

Construction activities associated with the Project would result in temporary sources of on -site fugitive dust and construction equipment emissions. During operation, emissions from forklifts, the yar d truck, haul trucks and passenger vehicles would be the primary source of emissions. The passenger vehicle and truck trips during construction and operation were modeled using a 1,000-foot trip distance to capture onsite emissions. The maximum allowable daily emissions that would satisfy the SCAQMD localized significance criteria for S RA 34 are presented in Tables 7 and 8 and compared to the maximum daily on-site construction and operational emissions.

Table 7. Localized Significance Thresholds Analysis for Project Construction - Unmitigated
Maximum On -Site
Emissions
NO2 CO PM10 PM2.5
Pounds per Day
2023 27.59 20.12 10.12 5.71
2024 13.91 16.91 0.63 0.58
Maximum 27.59 20.12 10.12 5.71
SCAQMD LST 321 3,440 54 15
LST Exceeded? No No No No
Source: SCAQMD 2009.

Notes: NO2 = nitrogen dioxide; CO = carbon monoxide; PM10 = coarse particulate matter; PM2.5 = fine particulate matter; SCAQMD = South Coast Air Quality Management District; LST = localized significance threshold.

Localized significance thresholds are shown for a 3.5-acre Project site corresponding to a distance to a sensitive receptor of 100 meters.

The estimates reflect control of fugitive dust (watering two times daily) required by South Coast Air Quality Management Dist rict Rule 403.

Table 8. Localized Significance Thresholds Analysis for Project Operation - Unmitigated
Maximum On -Site
Emissions
NO2 CO PM10 PM2.5
Pounds per Day
Operational Emissions
(Maximum)

0.71 1.13 0.03 0.01
SCAQMD LST 321 3,440 13 4
LST Exceeded? No No No No
Source: SCAQMD 2009.

Page 689 ends

WHITTRAM AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

14933 16 DECEMBER 2022
Notes: NO2 = nitrogen dioxide; CO = carbon monoxide; PM10 = coarse particulate matter; PM2.5 = fine particulate matter; SCAQMD = South Coast Air Quality Management District; LST = localized significance threshold.

Localized significance thresholds are shown for a 3.5-acre Project site corresponding to a distance to a sensitive receptor of 100 meters.

The estimates reflect control of fugitive dust (watering two times daily) required by South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403.

As shown in Tables 7 and 8, the Project LST would not exceed the established significance thresholds, and thus, would result in a less than significant localized impact to sensitive receptors during construction and operation.

CO Hotspots
Traffic-congested roadways and intersections have the potential to generate localized high levels of CO. Localized areas where ambient concentrations exceed federal and/or state standards for CO are termed “CO hotspots.” The transport of CO is extremely limited, as it disperses rapidly with distance from the so urce. However, under certain extreme meteorological conditions, CO concentrations near a congested roadway or intersection may reach unhealthy levels, affecting sensitive receptors. Typically, high CO concentrations are associated with severely congested intersections operating at an unacceptable level of service (LOS) (LOS E or worse is unacceptable).

Projects contributing to adverse traffic impacts may result in the formation of a CO hotspot. Additional analysis of CO hotspot impacts would be conducted if a Project would result in a significant impact or contribute to an adverse traffic impact at a signalized intersection that would potentially subject sensitive receptors to CO hotspots. The Project is anticipated to generate approximately 148 average daily trips (ADT).

At the time that the SCAQMD Handbook (1993) was published, the SCAB was designated nonattainment under the CAAQS and NAAQS for CO. In 2007, the SCAQMD was designated in attainment for CO under both the CAAQS and NAAQS as a result of the stea dy decline in CO concentrations in the SCAB due to turnover of older vehicles, introduction of cleaner fuels, and implementation of control technology on industrial facilities. The SCAQMD conducted CO modeling for the 2003 AQMP6 (SCAQMD 2003) for the four worst-case intersections in the SCAB: (1) Wilshire Boulevard and Veteran Avenue, (2) Sunset Boulevard and Highland Avenue, (3) La Cienega Boulevard and Century Boulevard, and (4) Long Beach Boulevard and Imperial Highway. At the time the 2003 AQMP was prepared, the intersection of Wilshire Boulevard and Veteran Avenue was the most congested intersection in Los Angeles County, with an average daily traffic volume of about 100,000 vehicles per day. The 2003 AQMP also projected 8- hour CO concentrations at the se four intersections for 1997 and from 2002 through 2005. From years 2002 through 2005, the maximum 8-hour CO concentration was 3.8 ppm at the Sunset Boulevard and Highland Avenue intersection in 2002; the maximum 8-hour CO concentration was 3.4 ppm at th e Wilshire Boulevard and Veteran Avenue in 2002. Accordingly, CO concentrations at congested intersections would not exceed the 1-hour or 8-hour CO CAAQS unless projected daily traffic would be at least over 100,000 vehicles per day. The Project’s anticipated ADT of 148 is minimal, and is not of a magnitude expected to raise the traffic volumes at intersections within proximity of the proposed Project to the 100,000 vehicles per day that could result in a CO hotspot.

Additionally, ambient CO levels are mon itored at the Mission Viejo -26081 Via Pera air quality monitoring station, which is approximately 9.5 miles northeast of the Project site and represents ambient air quality in the Project area.

Ambient CO levels monitored at this representative monitoring station indicate that the highest recorded 1 -hour concentration of CO is 1.7 ppm (the State standard is 20 ppm) and highest 8 -hour concentration is 0.9 ppm (the State standard is 9 ppm) during the past 3 years of available data (EPA 2021). As discussed above, the highest CO

6 SCAQMD’s CO hotspot modeling guidance has not changed since 2003.

Page 690 ends

WHITTRAM AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

14933 17 DECEMBER 2022
concentrations typically occur during peak traffic hours, so CO impacts calculated under peak traffic conditions represent a worst-case analysis. Given the considerably low level of CO concentrations in the Project area, and the minimal increase in daily trips, Project-related mobile emissions are not expected to contribute significantly to CO concentrations, and a CO hotspot is not anticipated to occur. In addition, due to continued improvement in vehicular emissions at a rate faster tha n the rate of vehicle growth and/or congestion, the potential for CO hotspots in the SCAB is steadily decreasing. Based on these considerations, the proposed Project would result in a less -than- significant impact to air quality with regard to potential CO hotspots.

Toxic Air Contaminants
“Incremental cancer risk” is the net increased likelihood that a person continuously exposed to concentrations of TACs resulting from a Project over a 9-, 30-, and 70-year exposure period would contract cancer based on the use of standard Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) risk assessment methodology (OEHHA 2015). In addition, some TACs have non -carcinogenic effects. TACs that would potentially be emitted during construction activities would be DPM emit ted from heavy -duty construction equipment and heavy -duty trucks.

Heavy-duty construction equipment and diesel trucks are subject to CARB Airborne Toxic Control Measures to reduce DPM emissions. According to the OEHHA, HRAs should be based on a 30-year exposure duration based on typical residency period; however, such assessments should be limited to the period/duration of activities associated with a Project (OEHHA 2015). The results of the HRA for proposed Project’s construction is summarized in Table 9.

Table 9. Summary of Maximum Cancer and Chronic Health Risks - Unmitigated Impact
Analysis Impact Parameter Units
Project
Impact
CEQA
Threshold
Level of
Significance
Maximally Exposed Individual Resident
Construction
HRA
Cancer Risk Per Million 6.88 10 Less than Significant
Chronic Hazard Index Index Value 0.009 1.0 Less than Significant Source: See Appendix B for complete results.

Notes: CEQA = California Environmental Quality Act; HRA = Health Risk Assessment As shown in Table 9, Project construction activities would result in a Residential Maximum Individual Cancer Risk of 6.9 in 1 million, which is less than the significance threshold of 10 in 1 million. Project construction would result in a Residential Chronic Hazard Index of 0.009, which is below the 1.0 significance threshold. Impacts would be less than significant. The detailed model outputs are provided in Appendix B.

Regarding operation, the Project may emit DPM from trucks visiting the site. However, according to CARB’s land use handbook, warehouses with fewer than 100 trucks per day are not expected to result in a significant impact (CARB 2005). As the Project would generate ap proximately 20 trucks per day (Dudek 2022) , impacts during operation would be less than significant.

Health Effects of Criteria Air Pollutants
Construction of the Project would generate criteria air pollutant emissions; however, the Project would not exceed the SCAQMD mass-emission thresholds.

The SCAB is designated as nonattainment for O3 for the NAAQS and CAAQS. Thus, existing O3 levels in the SCAB are at unhealthy levels during certain periods. The health effects associated with O 3 generally relate to reduced lung

Page 691 ends

WHITTRAM AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

14933 18 DECEMBER 2022
function. Because the Project would not involve construction activities that would result in O3 precursor emissions (VOC or NOx) that would exceed the SCAQMD thresholds, the Project is not anticipated to substantially contribute to regional O3 concentrations and associated health impacts. Similar to construction, no SCAQMD threshold would be exceeded during operation.

In addition to O3, NOx emissions contribute to potential exceedances of the NAAQS and CAAQS for NO2 (since NO2 is a constituent of NOx). Exposure to NO2 can cause lung irritation, bronchitis, and pneumonia, and lower resistance to respiratory infections. As shown in Tables 5 and 6, Project construction and operation would not exceed the SCAQMD localized thresholds for NO2. Thus, construction and operation of the Project are not expected to exceed the NO2 standards or contribute to associated health effects.

CO tends to be a localized impact associated with congested intersections. CO competes with oxygen, often replacing it in the blood, reducing the blood ’s ability to transport oxygen to vital organs. The results of excess CO exposure can include dizziness, fatigue, and impairment of central nervous system functions. CO hotspots were discussed previously as a less than significant impact. Thus, the Project’s CO emissions would not contribute to the health effects associated with this pollutant.

The SCAB is designated as nonattainment for PM10 under the CAAQS and nonattainment for PM2.5 under the NAAQS and CAAQS. Particulate matter contains microscopic solids or liquid droplets that are so small that they can get deep into the lungs and cause serious health problems. Particulate matter exposure has been linked to a variety of problems, including premature death in people with heart or lung disease, nonfatal heart attacks, irregular heartbeat, aggravated asthma, decreased lung function, and increased respiratory symptoms such as irritation of the airways, coughing, or difficulty breathing (EPA 2016). As with O3 and NOx, the Project would not generate emissions of PM10 or PM2.5 that would exceed SCAQMD’s LSTs. Accordingly, the Project’s PM10 and PM2.5 emissions are not expected to cause any increase in related regional health effects for these pollutants.

In summary, as shown in Tables 7 and 8, the Project would not result in any potentially significant contribution to local or regional concentrations of nonattainment pollutants and would not result in a significant contribution to the adverse health impacts associated with those pollutants. Impacts would be less than significant.

6.4 Would the Project result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
The occurrence and severity of potential odor impacts depends on numerous factors. The nature, frequency, and intensity of the source; the wind speeds and direction; and the sensitivity of receiving location each contribute to the intensity of the impact. Although offensive odors seldom cause physical harm, they can be annoying and cause distress among the public and generate citizen complaints.

Odors would be potentially generated from vehicles and equipment exhaust emissions during construction of the Project. Potential o dors produced during construction would be attributable to concentrations of unburned hydrocarbons from tailpipes of construction equipment and asphalt pavement application . Such odors would disperse rapidly from the Project site and generally occur at magnitudes that would not affect substantial numbers of people. Therefore, impacts associated with odors during construction would be less than significant.

Page 692 ends

WHITTRAM AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

14933 19 DECEMBER 2022
Land uses and industrial operat ions associated with odor complaints include agricultural uses, wastewater treatment plants, food-processing plants, chemical plants, composting operations, refineries, landfills, dairies, and fiberglass molding facilities (SCAQMD 1993). Once construction associated with the warehouse are completed, operational activities associated with the Project would include truck and worker trips. Vehicle trips associated with operation would not represent a significant source of impacts associated w ith odors. Impacts would be less than significant.
7 Conclusions
Criteria air pollutant emissions generated during construction and operation of the Project would not exceed SCAQMD’s significance thresholds or result in a cumulatively considerable net increase in emissions. Similarly, the emissions would also not exceed the LST significance thresholds for sensitive receptors during construction or operations, or create a CO hotspot. Therefore, the Project would result in a less than significant impact. 8 References Cited
14 CCR 15000–15387 and Appendices A–L. Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended.
4th and Hermosa Trip Generation and VMT Screening Analysis, Dudek, December 2022.

CAPCOA (California Air Pollution Control Officers Association). 2008. CEQA & Climate Change: Evaluating and Addressing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Projects Subject to the California Environmental Quality Act.

January 2008.

CAPCOA. 2021. California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) User’s Guide Version 2020.4.0. Prepared by Trinity Consultants and the California Air Districts. May 2021. Accessed November 2021. http://www.caleemod.com/
CARB (California Air Resources Board). 2005. Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective.https://sfmohcd.org/sites/default/files/20%20%20CARB%2C%20Air%20Quality%20and% 20Land%20Use%20Handbook%202005.pdf.

CARB. 2008. Climate Change Scoping Plan: A Framework for Change. December 2008. Accessed January 2019. http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/
document/scopingplandocument.htm.

CARB. 2014. First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan Building on the Framework Pursuant to AB 32 – The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. May 2014. Accessed January 2019. http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/2013_update/first_update_ climate_change_scoping_plan.pdf.

CARB. 2017. The 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update. January 20. Accessed January 2019. https://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/2030sp_pp_final.pdf.

Page 693 ends

WHITTRAM AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

14933 20 DECEMBER 2022
CARB. 2020. Maps of State and Federal Area Designations. Accessed December 2022. Maps of State and Federal Area Designations | California Air Resources Board.

CAT (Climate Action Team). 2010. Climate Action Team Biennial Report. Sacramento, California. April 2010. Accessed January 2019. http://www.energy.ca.gov/2010publications/CAT-1000-2010-004/CAT-1000-2010-004.PDF.

City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2021. City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update. https://www.cityofrc.us/GeneralPlanprocess.

CNRA (California Natural Resources Agency). 2009a. Final Statement of Reasons for Regulatory Action:

Amendments to the State CEQA Guidelines Addressing Analysis and Mitigation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Pursuant to SB 97. December 2009.

CNRA. 2009b. 2009 California Climate Adaptation Strategy: A Report to the Governor of the State of California in Response to Executive Order S-13-2008. http://resources.ca.gov/docs/climate/ Statewide_Adaptation_Strategy.pdf.

Dudek. 2022. Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled Screening Analysis Memorandum for the Whittram Avenue Project.

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2016. “Health and Environmental Effects of Particulate Matter (PM).” https://www.epa.gov/pm-pollution/health-and-environmental-effects-particulate-matter-pm.

EPA. 2021. Monitor Values Report. Available: https://www.epa.gov/outdoor-air-quality-data/monitor-values-report EPA 2021a. EPA 2021, PM Hot-spot Guidance. Transportation Conformity Guidance for Quantitative Hot-spot Analysis in PM2.5 and PM10 Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas. PM Hot-spot Guidance:

Transportation Conformity Guidance for Quantitative Hot-spot Analyses in PM2.5 and PM10 Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas (EPA-420-B-21-037, October 2021) EPA. 2022. Nonattainment Areas for Criteria Pollutants. November 2022. Accessed December 2022. https://www.epa.gov/green-book.

IPCC. 2007. IPCC Fourth Assessment Synthesis of Scientific-Technical Information Relevant to Interpreting Article 2 of the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. November. Accessed January 2019. https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr.pdf.

OEHHA (Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment). 2015. Air Toxics Hot Spots Program. Risk Assessment Guidelines. Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments. February 2015.

Accessed November 2022. http://oehha.ca.gov/air/hot_spots/2015/2015GuidanceManual.pdf.

OPR (Governor’s Office of Planning and Research). 2008. CEQA and Climate Change: Addressing Climate Change through California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Review.

SCAG (Southern California Association of Governments). 2001. Employment Density Study Summary Report.

October 31, 2001. Accessed December 2017. http://www.mwcog.org/ uploads/committee-documents/bl5aX1pa20091008155406.pdf.

Page 694 ends

WHITTRAM AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

14933 21 DECEMBER 2022
SCAG. 2016. 2016–2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy. Adopted April 7, 2016. Accessed January 2019. http://scagrtpscs.net/Pages/FINAL2016RTPSCS.aspx.

SCAG. 2020. Connect SoCal Plan. May 7. Accessed May 2020. https://www.connectsocal.org/ Documents/Adopted/fConnectSoCal-Plan.pdf.

SCAQMD (South Coast Air Quality Management District). 1993. CEQA Air Quality Handbook. Accessed November 2022. http://www.aqmd.gov/home/rules-compliance/ceqa/air-quality-analysis-handbook/ ceqa-air-quality-handbook-(1993).

SCAQMD. 2003. Final 2003 AQMP Appendix V Modeling and Attainment Demonstrations. August 2003. https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/clean-air-plans/air-quality-management-plans/2003-air- quality-management-plan/2003-aqmp-appendix-v.pdf?sfvrsn=2.

SCAQMD. 2003b. Health Risk Assessment Guidance for Analyzing Cancer Risks from Mobile Source Diesel Idling Emissions for CEQA Air Quality Analysis. http://www.aqmd.gov/home/rules-compliance/ceqa/air-quality- analysis-handbook/mobile-source-toxics-analysis.

SCAQMD. 2008. Draft Guidance Document – Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Significance Threshold.

October 2008. Accessed January 2019. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqa-significance-thresholds/ghgattachmente.pdf.

SCAQMD. 2009. Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology. July. Accessed November 2022. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/localized-significance-thresholds/final-lst- methodology-document.pdf?sfvrsn=2.

SCAQMD. 2010. “Greenhouse Gases CEQA Significance Thresholds Working Group Meeting No. 15.” September 28, 2010. Accessed January 2019. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/ greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqa-significance-thresholds/year-2008-2009/ghg-meeting-15/ ghg-meeting-15-main-presentation.pdf?sfvrsn=2.

SCAQMD. 2014. SCAQMD High Cube Warehouse Truck Trip Study White Paper Summary of Business Survey Results. June. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/high-cube-warehouse-trip- rate-study-for-air-quality-analysis/business-survey-summary.pdf.

SCAQMD. 2016. Rule 1113 Architectural Coatings. February 5, 2016. Accessed November 2022. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule-book/reg-xi/r1113.pdf?sfvrsn=17.

SCAQMD. 2017. Final 2016 Air Quality Management Plan. March 16, 2017. Accessed November 2022. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/clean-air-plans/air-quality-management-plans/2016-air- quality-management-plan/final-2016-aqmp/final2016aqmp.pdf?sfvrsn=15.

SCAQMD. 2017b. Risk Assessment Procedures for Rules 1401, 1401.1, and 212. http://www.aqmd.gov/home/permits/risk-assessment
SCAQMD. 2019. “SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds.” Originally published in CEQA Air Quality Handbook, Table A9-11-A. Revised April 2019. Accessed November 2022. http://www.aqmd.gov/ docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality-significance-thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=2.

Page 695 ends

WHITTRAM AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

14933 22 DECEMBER 2022
SCAQMD. 2021. Data for AERMOD. https://www.aqmd.gov/home/air-quality/meteorological-data/data-for- aermod.

SCAQMD. 2022. South Coast AQMD Modeling Guidance for AERMOD. Accessed November 2022. http://www.aqmd.gov/home/air-quality/meteorological-data/modeling-guidance.

Page 696 ends

Attachment A
CalEEMod Emissions Output
HRA Files

Page 697 ends

Whittram Warehouse Project
San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Gradable site area = 4.11 acres. Per applicant provided information.

Construction Phase - Per applicant provided information, 11 month construction schedule.

Off-road Equipment - Default
Off-road Equipment - Default
Off-road Equipment - Default
Off-road Equipment - Default
Off-road Equipment - Default

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 43.20 1000sqft 0.99 43,196.00 0 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-Rail 43.20 1000sqft 0.99 43,196.00 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 42.20 1000sqft 0.97 42,200.00 0
Parking Lot 73.00 Space 0.66 29,200.00 0
City Park 0.50 Acre 0.50 21,780.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
10 Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 32

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
2024Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 0.033CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:51 AMPage 1 of 37 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 698 ends

Off-road Equipment - Default
Trips and VMT - Trips rounded up to nearest even number to account for arrival and departure trips. Vendor trips added for demo, site prep, and grading for dust suppression trucks.

Demolition - Based on 29,767 sqft of pavement removal and 4,000 of structures removed.

Grading - Applicant provided
Vehicle Trips - Based on traffic analysis.

Fleet Mix - No rail represents trucks, rail represents passenger vehicles based on traffic analysis Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 230.00 171.00
tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 0.63
tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 0.00
tblFleetMix LDA 0.54 0.00
tblFleetMix LDA 0.54 0.70
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.00
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.07
tblFleetMix LDT2 0.17 0.00
tblFleetMix LDT2 0.17 0.22
tblFleetMix LHD1 0.03 0.22
tblFleetMix LHD1 0.03 0.00
tblFleetMix LHD2 7.1040e-003 0.06
tblFleetMix LHD2 7.1040e-003 0.00
tblFleetMix MCY 0.03 0.00
tblFleetMix MCY 0.03 0.00
tblFleetMix MDV 0.14 0.00
tblFleetMix MDV 0.14 0.00
tblFleetMix MH 4.8300e-003 0.00
tblFleetMix MH 4.8300e-003 0.00
tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 0.10
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:51 AMPage 2 of 37 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 699 ends

tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 0.00
tblFleetMix OBUS 5.5400e-004 0.00
tblFleetMix OBUS 5.5400e-004 0.00
tblFleetMix SBUS 9.5400e-004 0.00
tblFleetMix SBUS 9.5400e-004 0.00
tblFleetMix UBUS 2.5100e-004 0.00
tblFleetMix UBUS 2.5100e-004 0.00
tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 17,003.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 43,200.00 43,196.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 43,200.00 43,196.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 139.00 140.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 2,125.00 2,126.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 29.00 30.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 16.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 16.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 75.00 76.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 16.00
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 40.00
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 40.00
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 40.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.96 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.74 0.95
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.74 2.48
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 2.19 0.00
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.74 0.95
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.74 2.48
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:51 AMPage 3 of 37 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 700 ends

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 0.78 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.74 0.95
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.74 2.48
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:51 AMPage 4 of 37 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 701 ends

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.1512 1.4238 1.4889 3.6200e-
003

0.1772 0.0599 0.2372 0.0641 0.0562 0.1203 0.0000 326.4440 326.4440 0.0530 0.0159 332.4955 2024 0.4686 0.4693 0.6275 1.2400e-
003

0.0301 0.0204 0.0505 8.1200e-
003

0.0192 0.0273 0.0000 109.6158 109.6158 0.0198 2.4800e-
003
110.8493
Maximum 0.4686 1.4238 1.4889 3.6200e-
003

0.1772 0.0599 0.2372 0.0641 0.0562 0.1203 0.0000 326.4440 326.4440 0.0530 0.0159 332.4955 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.1512 1.4238 1.4889 3.6200e-
003

0.1258 0.0599 0.1857 0.0413 0.0562 0.0975 0.0000 326.4438 326.4438 0.0530 0.0159 332.4952 2024 0.4686 0.4693 0.6275 1.2400e-
003

0.0301 0.0204 0.0505 8.1200e-
003

0.0192 0.0273 0.0000 109.6157 109.6157 0.0198 2.4800e-
003
110.8492
Maximum 0.4686 1.4238 1.4889 3.6200e-
003

0.1258 0.0599 0.1857 0.0413 0.0562 0.0975 0.0000 326.4438 326.4438 0.0530 0.0159 332.4952 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:51 AMPage 5 of 37 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 702 ends

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.80 0.00 17.88 31.53 0.00 15.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 6-1-2023 8-31-2023 0.8188 0.8188
2 9-1-2023 11-30-2023 0.5706 0.5706
3 12-1-2023 2-29-2024 0.5482 0.5482
4 3-1-2024 5-31-2024 0.5894 0.5894
Highest 0.8188 0.8188

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.3583 2.0000e-
005

2.5800e-
003

0.0000 1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.0000 5.0200e-
003

5.0200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

0.0000 5.3400e-
003
Energy 9.4000e-
004

8.5100e-
003

7.1500e-
003

5.0000e-
005

6.5000e-
004

0.0000 46.6243 46.6243 3.3300e-
003

5.5000e-
004

46.8720
Mobile 0.0509 0.5301 1.3353 6.2700e-
003

0.6181 6.1600e-
003

0.6243 0.1652 5.8100e-
003

0.1710 0.0000 587.2831 587.2831 0.0124 0.0371 598.6339
Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 16.4951 0.0000 16.4951 0.9748 0.0000 40.8658 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.3387 47.3119 53.6507 0.6550 0.0159 74.7520 Total 0.4101 0.5386 1.3450 6.3200e-
003

0.6181 6.8200e-
003

0.6250 0.1652 6.4700e-
003

0.1717 22.8338 681.2243 704.0581 1.6456 0.0535 761.1291 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:51 AMPage 6 of 37 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 703 ends

2.5800e-
003

0.0000 1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.0000 5.0200e-
003

5.0200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

0.0000 5.3400e-
003
Energy 9.4000e-
004

8.5100e-
003

7.1500e-
003

5.0000e-
005

6.5000e-
004

0.0000 46.6243 46.6243 3.3300e-
003

5.5000e-
004

46.8720
Mobile 0.0509 0.5301 1.3353 6.2700e-
003

0.6181 6.1600e-
003

0.6243 0.1652 5.8100e-
003

0.6181 6.8200e-
003

0.6250 0.1652 6.4700e-
003

0.1717 22.8338 681.2243 704.0581 1.6456 0.0535 761.1291 Mitigated Operational

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:51 AMPage 7 of 37 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 704 ends

4 Building Construction Building Construction 7/18/2023 3/12/2024 5 171 5 Paving Paving 3/13/2024 4/5/2024 5 18
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 4/6/2024 5/1/2024 5 18 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 2 6.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 6.00 132 0.36
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 129,588; Non-Residential Outdoor: 43,196; Striped Parking Area: 4,284 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 7.5
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 8
Acres of Paving: 1.63
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:51 AMPage 8 of 37 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 705 ends

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
Paving Rollers 2 6.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 16.00 4.00 140.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 4.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 6 16.00 4.00 2,126.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 76.00 30.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 16.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:51 AMPage 9 of 37 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 706 ends

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0151 0.0000 0.0151 2.2800e-
003

0.0000 2.2800e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0227 0.2148 0.1964 3.9000e-
004

9.9800e-
003

9.2800e-
003

0.0000 33.9921 33.9921 9.5200e-
003

0.0000 34.2301
Total 0.0227 0.2148 0.1964 3.9000e-
004

0.0151 9.9800e-
003

0.0251 2.2800e-
003

9.2800e-
003

0.0116 0.0000 33.9921 33.9921 9.5200e-
003

0.0000 34.2301
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 1.6000e-
004

8.1400e-
003

2.3600e-
003

4.0000e-
005

1.2100e-
003

8.0000e-
005

1.2900e-
003

3.3000e-
004

8.0000e-
005

4.1000e-
004

0.0000 3.8899 3.8899 1.7000e-
004

6.2000e-
004

4.0778
Vendor 5.0000e-
005

1.4800e-
003

6.0000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

2.5000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

2.6000e-
004

7.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

8.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.6971 0.6971 2.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
004

0.7283
Worker 5.6000e-
004

4.2000e-
004

5.1900e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.7500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.7600e-
003

4.7000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

4.7000e-
004

0.0000 1.3532 1.3532 4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

1.3652
Total 7.7000e-
004

0.0100 8.1500e-
003

6.0000e-
005

3.2100e-
003

1.0000e-
004

3.3100e-
003

8.7000e-
004

1.0000e-
004

9.6000e-
004

0.0000 5.9403 5.9403 2.3000e-
004

7.6000e-
004

6.1713
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:51 AMPage 10 of 37 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 707 ends

0.0000 6.7800e-
003

1.0300e-
003

0.0000 1.0300e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0227 0.2148 0.1964 3.9000e-
004

9.9800e-
003

9.2800e-
003

0.0000 33.9920 33.9920 9.5200e-
003

0.0000 34.2300
Total 0.0227 0.2148 0.1964 3.9000e-
004

6.7800e-
003

9.9800e-
003

0.0168 1.0300e-
003

9.2800e-
003

0.0103 0.0000 33.9920 33.9920 9.5200e-
003

0.0000 34.2300
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 1.6000e-
004

8.1400e-
003

2.3600e-
003

4.0000e-
005

1.2100e-
003

8.0000e-
005

1.2900e-
003

3.3000e-
004

8.0000e-
005

4.1000e-
004

0.0000 3.8899 3.8899 1.7000e-
004

6.2000e-
004

4.0778
Vendor 5.0000e-
005

1.4800e-
003

6.0000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

2.5000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

2.6000e-
004

7.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

8.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.6971 0.6971 2.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
004

0.7283
Worker 5.6000e-
004

4.2000e-
004

5.1900e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.7500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.7600e-
003

4.7000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

4.7000e-
004

0.0000 1.3532 1.3532 4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

1.3652
Total 7.7000e-
004

0.0100 8.1500e-
003

6.0000e-
005

3.2100e-
003

1.0000e-
004

3.3100e-
003

8.7000e-
004

1.0000e-
004

9.6000e-
004

0.0000 5.9403 5.9403 2.3000e-
004

7.6000e-
004

6.1713
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:51 AMPage 11 of 37 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 708 ends

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0491 0.0000 0.0491 0.0253 0.0000 0.0253 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 6.6500e-
003

0.0688 0.0456 1.0000e-
004

3.1700e-
003

2.9100e-
003

0.0000 8.3627 8.3627 2.7000e-
003

0.0000 8.4303
Total 6.6500e-
003

0.0688 0.0456 1.0000e-
004

0.0491 3.1700e-
003

0.0523 0.0253 2.9100e-
003

0.0282 0.0000 8.3627 8.3627 2.7000e-
003

0.0000 8.4303
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.0000e-
005

3.7000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

0.0000 6.0000e-
005

0.0000 7.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.1743 0.1743 0.0000 3.0000e-
005

0.1821
Worker 1.6000e-
004

1.2000e-
004

1.4600e-
003

0.0000 4.9000e-
004

0.0000 5.0000e-
004

1.3000e-
004

0.0000 1.3000e-
004

0.0000 0.3806 0.3806 1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.3840
Total 1.7000e-
004

4.9000e-
004

1.6100e-
003

0.0000 5.5000e-
004

0.0000 5.7000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

0.0000 1.5000e-
004

0.0000 0.5549 0.5549 1.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

0.5660
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:51 AMPage 12 of 37 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 709 ends

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0221 0.0000 0.0221 0.0114 0.0000 0.0114 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 6.6500e-
003

0.0688 0.0456 1.0000e-
004

3.1700e-
003

2.9100e-
003

0.0000 8.3627 8.3627 2.7000e-
003

0.0000 8.4303
Total 6.6500e-
003

0.0688 0.0456 1.0000e-
004

0.0221 3.1700e-
003

0.0253 0.0114 2.9100e-
003

0.0143 0.0000 8.3627 8.3627 2.7000e-
003

0.0000 8.4303
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.0000e-
005

3.7000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

0.0000 6.0000e-
005

0.0000 7.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.1743 0.1743 0.0000 3.0000e-
005

0.1821
Worker 1.6000e-
004

1.2000e-
004

1.4600e-
003

0.0000 4.9000e-
004

0.0000 5.0000e-
004

1.3000e-
004

0.0000 1.3000e-
004

0.0000 0.3806 0.3806 1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.3840
Total 1.7000e-
004

4.9000e-
004

1.6100e-
003

0.0000 5.5000e-
004

0.0000 5.7000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

0.0000 1.5000e-
004

0.0000 0.5549 0.5549 1.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

0.5660
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:51 AMPage 13 of 37 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 710 ends

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0293 0.0000 0.0293 0.0138 0.0000 0.0138 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 6.8400e-
003

0.0717 0.0590 1.2000e-
004

3.1000e-
003

2.8500e-
003

0.0000 10.4243 10.4243 3.3700e-
003

0.0000 10.5085
Total 6.8400e-
003

0.0717 0.0590 1.2000e-
004

0.0293 3.1000e-
003

0.0324 0.0138 2.8500e-
003

0.0167 0.0000 10.4243 10.4243 3.3700e-
003

0.0000 10.5085
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 2.4800e-
003

0.1236 0.0359 6.0000e-
004

0.0183 1.2300e-
003

0.0195 5.0300e-
003

1.1800e-
003

6.2100e-
003

0.0000 59.0714 59.0714 2.5200e-
003

9.3600e-
003

61.9245
Vendor 2.0000e-
005

5.9000e-
004

2.4000e-
004

0.0000 1.0000e-
004

0.0000 1.1000e-
004

3.0000e-
005

0.0000 3.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.2789 0.2789 1.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

0.2913
Worker 2.2000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

2.0800e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
004

0.0000 7.1000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

0.0000 1.9000e-
004

0.0000 0.5413 0.5413 1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.5461
Total 2.7200e-
003

0.1244 0.0382 6.1000e-
004

0.0191 1.2300e-
003

0.0204 5.2500e-
003

1.1800e-
003

6.4300e-
003

0.0000 59.8916 59.8916 2.5400e-
003

9.4100e-
003

62.7619
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:51 AMPage 14 of 37 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 711 ends

0.0000 6.2300e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 6.8400e-
003

0.0717 0.0590 1.2000e-
004

3.1000e-
003

2.8500e-
003

0.0000 10.4242 10.4242 3.3700e-
003

0.0000 10.5085
Total 6.8400e-
003

0.0717 0.0590 1.2000e-
004

0.0132 3.1000e-
003

0.0163 6.2300e-
003

2.8500e-
003

9.0800e-
003

0.0000 10.4242 10.4242 3.3700e-
003

0.0000 10.5085
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 2.4800e-
003

0.1236 0.0359 6.0000e-
004

0.0183 1.2300e-
003

0.0195 5.0300e-
003

1.1800e-
003

6.2100e-
003

0.0000 59.0714 59.0714 2.5200e-
003

9.3600e-
003

61.9245
Vendor 2.0000e-
005

5.9000e-
004

2.4000e-
004

0.0000 1.0000e-
004

0.0000 1.1000e-
004

3.0000e-
005

0.0000 3.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.2789 0.2789 1.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

0.2913
Worker 2.2000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

2.0800e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
004

0.0000 7.1000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

0.0000 1.9000e-
004

0.0000 0.5413 0.5413 1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.5461
Total 2.7200e-
003

0.1244 0.0382 6.1000e-
004

0.0191 1.2300e-
003

0.0204 5.2500e-
003

1.1800e-
003

6.4300e-
003

0.0000 59.8916 59.8916 2.5400e-
003

9.4100e-
003

62.7619
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:51 AMPage 15 of 37 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 712 ends

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0936 0.8559 0.9665 1.6000e-
003

0.0416 0.0416 0.0392 0.0392 0.0000 137.9238 137.9238 0.0328 0.0000 138.7441 Total 0.0936 0.8559 0.9665 1.6000e-
003

0.0416 0.0416 0.0392 0.0392 0.0000 137.9238 137.9238 0.0328 0.0000 138.7441 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.0100e-
003

0.0659 0.0267 3.2000e-
004

0.0113 4.7000e-
004

0.0117 3.2500e-
003

4.5000e-
004

3.7000e-
003

0.0000 31.1095 31.1095 8.1000e-
004

4.6000e-
003

32.4998
Worker 0.0158 0.0118 0.1467 4.2000e-
004

0.0496 2.5000e-
004

0.0498 0.0132 2.3000e-
004

0.0134 0.0000 38.2450 38.2450 1.0200e-
003

1.0500e-
003

38.5835
Total 0.0178 0.0776 0.1734 7.4000e-
004

0.0608 7.2000e-
004

0.0616 0.0164 6.8000e-
004

0.0171 0.0000 69.3545 69.3545 1.8300e-
003

5.6500e-
003

71.0833
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:51 AMPage 16 of 37 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 713 ends

0.0416 0.0416 0.0392 0.0392 0.0000 137.9237 137.9237 0.0328 0.0000 138.7439 Total 0.0936 0.8559 0.9665 1.6000e-
003

0.0416 0.0416 0.0392 0.0392 0.0000 137.9237 137.9237 0.0328 0.0000 138.7439 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.0100e-
003

0.0659 0.0267 3.2000e-
004

0.0113 4.7000e-
004

0.0117 3.2500e-
003

4.5000e-
004

3.7000e-
003

0.0000 31.1095 31.1095 8.1000e-
004

4.6000e-
003

32.4998
Worker 0.0158 0.0118 0.1467 4.2000e-
004

0.0496 2.5000e-
004

0.0498 0.0132 2.3000e-
004

0.0134 0.0000 38.2450 38.2450 1.0200e-
003

1.0500e-
003

38.5835
Total 0.0178 0.0776 0.1734 7.4000e-
004

0.0608 7.2000e-
004

0.0616 0.0164 6.8000e-
004

0.0171 0.0000 69.3545 69.3545 1.8300e-
003

5.6500e-
003

71.0833
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:51 AMPage 17 of 37 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 714 ends

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0383 0.3495 0.4203 7.0000e-
004

0.0160 0.0160 0.0150 0.0150 0.0000 60.2808 60.2808 0.0143 0.0000 60.6371 Total 0.0383 0.3495 0.4203 7.0000e-
004

0.0160 0.0160 0.0150 0.0150 0.0000 60.2808 60.2808 0.0143 0.0000 60.6371 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 8.6000e-
004

0.0290 0.0115 1.4000e-
004

4.9200e-
003

2.0000e-
004

5.1200e-
003

1.4200e-
003

1.9000e-
004

1.6100e-
003

0.0000 13.4069 13.4069 3.4000e-
004

1.9800e-
003

14.0058
Worker 6.4000e-
003

4.5500e-
003

0.0597 1.8000e-
004

0.0217 1.0000e-
004

0.0218 5.7500e-
003

1.0000e-
004

5.8500e-
003

0.0000 16.2272 16.2272 4.0000e-
004

4.3000e-
004

16.3640
Total 7.2600e-
003

0.0336 0.0711 3.2000e-
004

0.0266 3.0000e-
004

0.0269 7.1700e-
003

2.9000e-
004

7.4600e-
003

0.0000 29.6341 29.6341 7.4000e-
004

2.4100e-
003

30.3698
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:51 AMPage 18 of 37 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 715 ends

0.0160 0.0160 0.0150 0.0150 0.0000 60.2807 60.2807 0.0143 0.0000 60.6371 Total 0.0383 0.3495 0.4203 7.0000e-
004

0.0160 0.0160 0.0150 0.0150 0.0000 60.2807 60.2807 0.0143 0.0000 60.6371 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 8.6000e-
004

0.0290 0.0115 1.4000e-
004

4.9200e-
003

2.0000e-
004

5.1200e-
003

1.4200e-
003

1.9000e-
004

1.6100e-
003

0.0000 13.4069 13.4069 3.4000e-
004

1.9800e-
003

14.0058
Worker 6.4000e-
003

4.5500e-
003

0.0597 1.8000e-
004

0.0217 1.0000e-
004

0.0218 5.7500e-
003

1.0000e-
004

5.8500e-
003

0.0000 16.2272 16.2272 4.0000e-
004

4.3000e-
004

16.3640
Total 7.2600e-
003

0.0336 0.0711 3.2000e-
004

0.0266 3.0000e-
004

0.0269 7.1700e-
003

2.9000e-
004

7.4600e-
003

0.0000 29.6341 29.6341 7.4000e-
004

2.4100e-
003

30.3698
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:51 AMPage 19 of 37 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 716 ends

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 7.9300e-
003

0.0745 0.1100 1.7000e-
004

3.5900e-
003

3.3200e-
003

0.0000 14.7423 14.7423 4.6300e-
003

0.0000 14.8581
Paving 2.1400e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0101 0.0745 0.1100 1.7000e-
004

3.5900e-
003

3.3200e-
003

0.0000 14.7423 14.7423 4.6300e-
003

0.0000 14.8581
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.8000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

5.4400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.9700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.9800e-
003

5.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

5.3000e-
004

0.0000 1.4782 1.4782 4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

1.4907
Total 5.8000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

5.4400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.9700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.9800e-
003

5.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

5.3000e-
004

0.0000 1.4782 1.4782 4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

1.4907
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:51 AMPage 20 of 37 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 717 ends

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 7.9300e-
003

0.0745 0.1100 1.7000e-
004

3.5900e-
003

3.3200e-
003

0.0000 14.7423 14.7423 4.6300e-
003

0.0000 14.8581
Paving 2.1400e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0101 0.0745 0.1100 1.7000e-
004

3.5900e-
003

3.3200e-
003

0.0000 14.7423 14.7423 4.6300e-
003

0.0000 14.8581
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.8000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

5.4400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.9700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.9800e-
003

5.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

5.3000e-
004

0.0000 1.4782 1.4782 4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

1.4907
Total 5.8000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

5.4400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.9700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.9800e-
003

5.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

5.3000e-
004

0.0000 1.4782 1.4782 4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

1.4907
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:51 AMPage 21 of 37 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 718 ends

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.4104 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.6300e-
003

0.0110 0.0163 3.0000e-
005

5.5000e-
004

0.0000 2.2979 2.2979 1.3000e-
004

0.0000 2.3012
Total 0.4120 0.0110 0.0163 3.0000e-
005

5.5000e-
004

0.0000 2.2979 2.2979 1.3000e-
004

0.0000 2.3012
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.7000e-
004

3.3000e-
004

4.3500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.5800e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.5900e-
003

4.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

4.3000e-
004

0.0000 1.1826 1.1826 3.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

1.1925
Total 4.7000e-
004

3.3000e-
004

4.3500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.5800e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.5900e-
003

4.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

4.3000e-
004

0.0000 1.1826 1.1826 3.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

1.1925
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:51 AMPage 22 of 37 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 719 ends

0.0110 0.0163 3.0000e-
005

5.5000e-
004

0.0000 2.2979 2.2979 1.3000e-
004

0.0000 2.3012
Total 0.4120 0.0110 0.0163 3.0000e-
005

5.5000e-
004

0.0000 2.2979 2.2979 1.3000e-
004

0.0000 2.3012
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.7000e-
004

3.3000e-
004

4.3500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.5800e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.5900e-
003

4.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

4.3000e-
004

0.0000 1.1826 1.1826 3.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

1.1925
Total 4.7000e-
004

3.3000e-
004

4.3500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.5800e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.5900e-
003

4.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

4.3000e-
004

0.0000 1.1826 1.1826 3.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

1.1925
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:51 AMPage 23 of 37 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 720 ends

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0509 0.5301 1.3353 6.2700e-
003

0.6181 6.1600e-
003

0.6243 0.1652 5.8100e-
003

0.1710 0.0000 587.2831 587.2831 0.0124 0.0371 598.6339
Unmitigated 0.0509 0.5301 1.3353 6.2700e-
003

0.6181 6.1600e-
003

0.6243 0.1652 5.8100e-
003

0.1710 0.0000 587.2831 587.2831 0.0124 0.0371 598.6339

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 41.04 41.04 41.04 175,886 175,886 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-Rail 107.14 107.14 107.14 1,454,724 1,454,724 Total 148.18 148.18 148.18 1,630,610 1,630,610
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by City Park 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 66 28 6
Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:51 AMPage 24 of 37 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 721 ends

Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail

16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00 0.00 41.00 92 5 3
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-Rail 40.00 40.00 40.00 59.00 0.00 41.00 92 5 3

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH City Park 0.540566 0.056059 0.172680 0.136494 0.026304 0.007104 0.011680 0.017449 0.000554 0.000251 0.025076 0.000954 0.004830 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.540566 0.056059 0.172680 0.136494 0.026304 0.007104 0.011680 0.017449 0.000554 0.000251 0.025076 0.000954 0.004830 Parking Lot 0.540566 0.056059 0.172680 0.136494 0.026304 0.007104 0.011680 0.017449 0.000554 0.000251 0.025076 0.000954 0.004830 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail

0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.219000 0.059000 0.097000 0.625000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-Rail 0.703000 0.073000 0.224000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000

5.0 Energy Detail

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:51 AMPage 25 of 37 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 722 ends

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 37.3577 37.3577 3.1500e- 003

3.8000e-
004

37.5505
Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 37.3577 37.3577 3.1500e- 003

3.8000e-
004

37.5505
NaturalGas
Mitigated

9.4000e-
004

8.5100e-
003

7.1500e-
003

5.0000e-
005

6.5000e-
004

0.0000 9.2665 9.2665 1.8000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

9.3216
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

9.4000e-
004

8.5100e-
003

7.1500e-
003

5.0000e-
005

6.5000e-
004

0.0000 9.2665 9.2665 1.8000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

9.3216
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:51 AMPage 26 of 37 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 723 ends

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
86824 4.7000e-
004

4.2600e-
003

3.5800e-
003

3.0000e-
005

3.2000e-
004

0.0000 4.6333 4.6333 9.0000e-
005

8.0000e-
005

4.6608
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-Rail
86824 4.7000e-
004

4.2600e-
003

3.5800e-
003

3.0000e-
005

3.2000e-
004

0.0000 4.6333 4.6333 9.0000e-
005

8.0000e-
005

4.6608
Total 9.4000e-
004

8.5200e-
003

7.1600e-
003

6.0000e-
005

6.4000e-
004

0.0000 9.2665 9.2665 1.8000e-
004

1.6000e-
004

9.3216
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:51 AMPage 27 of 37 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 724 ends

4.2600e-
003

3.5800e-
003

3.0000e-
005

3.2000e-
004

0.0000 4.6333 4.6333 9.0000e-
005

8.0000e-
005

4.6608
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-Rail
86824 4.7000e-
004

4.2600e-
003

3.5800e-
003

3.0000e-
005

3.2000e-
004

0.0000 4.6333 4.6333 9.0000e-
005

8.0000e-
005

4.6608
Total 9.4000e-
004

8.5200e-
003

7.1600e-
003

6.0000e-
005

6.4000e-
004

0.0000 9.2665 9.2665 1.8000e-
004

1.6000e-
004

9.3216
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:51 AMPage 28 of 37 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 725 ends

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 10220 1.8125 1.5000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

1.8218
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
100215 17.7726 1.5000e-
003

1.8000e-
004

17.8643
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-Rail
100215 17.7726 1.5000e-
003

1.8000e-
004

17.8643
Total 37.3577 3.1500e-
003

3.8000e-
004

37.5505
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:51 AMPage 29 of 37 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 726 ends

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

2.0000e-
005

1.8218
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
100215 17.7726 1.5000e-
003

1.8000e-
004

17.8643
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-Rail
100215 17.7726 1.5000e-
003

1.8000e-
004

17.8643
Total 37.3577 3.1500e-
003

3.8000e-
004

37.5505
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:51 AMPage 30 of 37 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 727 ends

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.3583 2.0000e-
005

2.5800e-
003

0.0000 1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.0000 5.0200e-
003

5.0200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

0.0000 5.3400e-
003
Unmitigated 0.3583 2.0000e-
005

2.5800e-
003

0.0000 1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.0000 5.0200e-
003

5.0200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

0.0000 5.3400e-
003

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0410 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.3170 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 2.4000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

2.5800e-
003

0.0000 1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.0000 5.0200e-
003

5.0200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

0.0000 5.3400e-
003
Total 0.3583 2.0000e-
005

2.5800e-
003

0.0000 1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.0000 5.0200e-
003

5.0200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

0.0000 5.3400e-
003
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:51 AMPage 31 of 37 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 728 ends

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.0410 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.3170 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 2.4000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

2.5800e-
003

0.0000 1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.0000 5.0200e-
003

5.0200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

0.0000 5.3400e-
003
Total 0.3583 2.0000e-
005

2.5800e-
003

0.0000 1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.0000 5.0200e-
003

5.0200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

0.0000 5.3400e-
003
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:51 AMPage 32 of 37 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 729 ends

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 53.6507 0.6550 0.0159 74.7520
Unmitigated 53.6507 0.6550 0.0159 74.7520

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
City Park 0 /

0.595741

1.1738 1.0000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

1.1799
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail

9.99 / 0 26.2384 0.3275 7.9200e-
003

36.7861
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-Rail

9.99 / 0 26.2384 0.3275 7.9200e-
003

36.7861
Total 53.6507 0.6550 0.0159 74.7520
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:51 AMPage 33 of 37 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 730 ends

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
City Park 0 /

0.595741

1.1738 1.0000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

1.1799
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail

9.99 / 0 26.2384 0.3275 7.9200e-
003

36.7861
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-Rail

9.99 / 0 26.2384 0.3275 7.9200e-
003

36.7861
Total 53.6507 0.6550 0.0159 74.7520
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:51 AMPage 34 of 37 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 731 ends

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 16.4951 0.9748 0.0000 40.8658
Unmitigated 16.4951 0.9748 0.0000 40.8658
Category/Year

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
City Park 0.04 8.1200e-
003

4.8000e-
004

0.0000 0.0201
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail

40.61 8.2435 0.4872 0.0000 20.4228
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-Rail

40.61 8.2435 0.4872 0.0000 20.4228
Total 16.4950 0.9748 0.0000 40.8658
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:51 AMPage 35 of 37 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 732 ends

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
City Park 0.04 8.1200e-
003

4.8000e-
004

0.0000 0.0201
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail

40.61 8.2435 0.4872 0.0000 20.4228
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-Rail

40.61 8.2435 0.4872 0.0000 20.4228
Total 16.4950 0.9748 0.0000 40.8658
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:51 AMPage 36 of 37 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 733 ends

11.0 Vegetation
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:51 AMPage 37 of 37 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 734 ends

Whittram Warehouse Project
San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Gradable site area = 4.11 acres. Per applicant provided information.

Construction Phase - Per applicant provided information, 11 month construction schedule.

Off-road Equipment - Default
Off-road Equipment - Default
Off-road Equipment - Default
Off-road Equipment - Default
Off-road Equipment - Default

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
10 Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 32

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
2024Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 0.033CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:54 AMPage 1 of 30 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 735 ends

Demolition - Based on 29,767 sqft of pavement removal and 4,000 of structures removed.

Grading - Applicant provided
Vehicle Trips - Based on traffic analysis.

Fleet Mix - No rail represents trucks, rail represents passenger vehicles based on traffic analysis Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 230.00 171.00
tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 0.63
tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 0.00
tblFleetMix LDA 0.54 0.00
tblFleetMix LDA 0.54 0.70
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.00
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.07
tblFleetMix LDT2 0.17 0.00
tblFleetMix LDT2 0.17 0.22
tblFleetMix LHD1 0.03 0.22
tblFleetMix LHD1 0.03 0.00
tblFleetMix LHD2 7.1040e-003 0.06
tblFleetMix LHD2 7.1040e-003 0.00
tblFleetMix MCY 0.03 0.00
tblFleetMix MCY 0.03 0.00
tblFleetMix MDV 0.14 0.00
tblFleetMix MDV 0.14 0.00
tblFleetMix MH 4.8300e-003 0.00
tblFleetMix MH 4.8300e-003 0.00
tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 0.10
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:54 AMPage 2 of 30 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 736 ends

tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 0.00
tblFleetMix OBUS 5.5400e-004 0.00
tblFleetMix OBUS 5.5400e-004 0.00
tblFleetMix SBUS 9.5400e-004 0.00
tblFleetMix SBUS 9.5400e-004 0.00
tblFleetMix UBUS 2.5100e-004 0.00
tblFleetMix UBUS 2.5100e-004 0.00
tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 17,003.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 43,200.00 43,196.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 43,200.00 43,196.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 139.00 140.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 2,125.00 2,126.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 29.00 30.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 16.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 16.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 75.00 76.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 16.00
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 40.00
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 40.00
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 40.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.96 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.74 0.95
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.74 2.48
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 2.19 0.00
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.74 0.95
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.74 2.48
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:54 AMPage 3 of 30 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 737 ends

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 0.78 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.74 0.95
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.74 2.48
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:54 AMPage 4 of 30 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 738 ends

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 2.7345 47.3419 24.3139 0.1813 19.8838 1.2681 21.1519 10.1632 1.1667 11.3299 0.0000 19,379.36 70 19,379.36
70 1.6291 2.5938 20,193.05
37 2024 45.8338 14.6644 19.2583 0.0396 1.0417 0.6251 1.6668 0.2806 0.5880 0.8687 0.0000 3,867.993 0 3,867.993
0 0.6357 0.1008 3,913.914
5 Maximum 45.8338 47.3419 24.3139 0.1813 19.8838 1.2681 21.1519 10.1632 1.1667 11.3299 0.0000 19,379.36 70 19,379.36
70 1.6291 2.5938 20,193.05
37 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 2.7345 47.3419 24.3139 0.1813 9.0725 1.2681 10.3405 4.6068 1.1667 5.7735 0.0000 19,379.36 70 19,379.36
70 1.6291 2.5938 20,193.05
37 2024 45.8338 14.6644 19.2583 0.0396 1.0417 0.6251 1.6668 0.2806 0.5880 0.8687 0.0000 3,867.993 0 3,867.993
0 0.6357 0.1008 3,913.914
5 Maximum 45.8338 47.3419 24.3139 0.1813 9.0725 1.2681 10.3405 4.6068 1.1667 5.7735 0.0000 19,379.36 70 19,379.36
70 1.6291 2.5938 20,193.05
37 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:54 AMPage 5 of 30 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 739 ends

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 51.67 0.00 47.38 53.20 0.00 45.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:54 AMPage 6 of 30 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 740 ends

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 1.9637 1.9000e-
004

0.0206 0.0000 7.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

0.0442 0.0442 1.2000e-
004

0.0471
Energy 5.1300e-
003

0.0466 0.0392 2.8000e-
004

3.5400e-
003

55.9703 55.9703 1.0700e-
003

1.0300e-
003

56.3029
Mobile 0.3207 2.7421 8.5786 0.0365 3.4612 0.0339 3.4951 0.9235 0.0319 0.9555 3,759.790 3 3,759.790
3 0.0764 0.2213 3,827.645
0 Total 2.2896 2.7889 8.6384 0.0367 3.4612 0.0375 3.4987 0.9235 0.0355 0.9591 3,815.804 9 3,815.804
9 0.0776 0.2223 3,883.995
1 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 1.9637 1.9000e-
004

0.0206 0.0000 7.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

0.0442 0.0442 1.2000e-
004

0.0471
Energy 5.1300e-
003

0.0466 0.0392 2.8000e-
004

3.5400e-
003

55.9703 55.9703 1.0700e-
003

1.0300e-
003

56.3029
Mobile 0.3207 2.7421 8.5786 0.0365 3.4612 0.0339 3.4951 0.9235 0.0319 0.9555 3,759.790 3 3,759.790
3 0.0764 0.2213 3,827.645
0 Total 2.2896 2.7889 8.6384 0.0367 3.4612 0.0375 3.4987 0.9235 0.0355 0.9591 3,815.804 9 3,815.804
9 0.0776 0.2223 3,883.995
1 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:54 AMPage 7 of 30 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 741 ends

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 6/1/2023 6/28/2023 5 20
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 6/29/2023 7/5/2023 5 5 3 Grading Grading 7/6/2023 7/17/2023 5 8
4 Building Construction Building Construction 7/18/2023 3/12/2024 5 171 5 Paving Paving 3/13/2024 4/5/2024 5 18
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 4/6/2024 5/1/2024 5 18 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 129,588; Non-Residential Outdoor: 43,196; Striped Parking Area: 4,284 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 7.5
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 8
Acres of Paving: 1.63
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:54 AMPage 8 of 30 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 742 ends

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 2 6.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 6.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 6.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 16.00 4.00 140.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 4.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 6 16.00 4.00 2,126.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 76.00 30.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 16.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:54 AMPage 9 of 30 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 743 ends

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 1.5076 0.0000 1.5076 0.2283 0.0000 0.2283 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 0.9975 0.9975 0.9280 0.9280 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Total 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 1.5076 0.9975 2.5051 0.2283 0.9280 1.1563 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0169 0.7699 0.2345 3.9300e-
003

0.1226 8.1000e-
003

0.1307 0.0336 7.7500e-
003

0.0414 428.5203 428.5203 0.0183 0.0679 449.2184
Vendor 4.6800e-
003

0.1403 0.0589 7.2000e-
004

0.0256 1.0500e-
003

0.0267 7.3800e-
003

1.0100e-
003

8.3900e-
003

76.7673 76.7673 2.0100e-
003

0.0113 80.1957
Worker 0.0625 0.0377 0.6018 1.6000e-
003

0.1788 8.8000e-
004

0.1797 0.0474 8.1000e-
004

0.0482 161.4418 161.4418 3.9000e-
003

3.8400e-
003
162.6849
Total 0.0841 0.9479 0.8951 6.2500e-
003

0.3271 0.0100 0.3371 0.0884 9.5700e-
003

0.0980 666.7294 666.7294 0.0242 0.0831 692.0990
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:54 AMPage 10 of 30 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 744 ends

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.6784 0.0000 0.6784 0.1027 0.0000 0.1027 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 0.9975 0.9975 0.9280 0.9280 0.0000 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Total 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 0.6784 0.9975 1.6759 0.1027 0.9280 1.0307 0.0000 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0169 0.7699 0.2345 3.9300e-
003

0.1226 8.1000e-
003

0.1307 0.0336 7.7500e-
003

0.0414 428.5203 428.5203 0.0183 0.0679 449.2184
Vendor 4.6800e-
003

0.1403 0.0589 7.2000e-
004

0.0256 1.0500e-
003

0.0267 7.3800e-
003

1.0100e-
003

8.3900e-
003

76.7673 76.7673 2.0100e-
003

0.0113 80.1957
Worker 0.0625 0.0377 0.6018 1.6000e-
003

0.1788 8.8000e-
004

0.1797 0.0474 8.1000e-
004

0.0482 161.4418 161.4418 3.9000e-
003

3.8400e-
003
162.6849
Total 0.0841 0.9479 0.8951 6.2500e-
003

0.3271 0.0100 0.3371 0.0884 9.5700e-
003

0.0980 666.7294 666.7294 0.0242 0.0831 692.0990
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:54 AMPage 11 of 30 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 745 ends

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 1.2660 1.2660 1.1647 1.1647 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Total 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 19.6570 1.2660 20.9230 10.1025 1.1647 11.2672 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 4.6800e-
003

0.1403 0.0589 7.2000e-
004

0.0256 1.0500e-
003

0.0267 7.3800e-
003

1.0100e-
003

8.3900e-
003

76.7673 76.7673 2.0100e-
003

0.0113 80.1957
Worker 0.0703 0.0424 0.6770 1.8000e-
003

0.2012 9.9000e-
004

0.2022 0.0534 9.1000e-
004

0.0543 181.6220 181.6220 4.3900e-
003

4.3200e-
003
183.0205
Total 0.0750 0.1827 0.7358 2.5200e-
003

0.2268 2.0400e-
003

0.2289 0.0607 1.9200e-
003

0.0627 258.3893 258.3893 6.4000e-
003

0.0157 263.2162
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:54 AMPage 12 of 30 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 746 ends

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.8457 0.0000 8.8457 4.5461 0.0000 4.5461 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 1.2660 1.2660 1.1647 1.1647 0.0000 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Total 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 8.8457 1.2660 10.1117 4.5461 1.1647 5.7108 0.0000 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 4.6800e-
003

0.1403 0.0589 7.2000e-
004

0.0256 1.0500e-
003

0.0267 7.3800e-
003

1.0100e-
003

8.3900e-
003

76.7673 76.7673 2.0100e-
003

0.0113 80.1957
Worker 0.0703 0.0424 0.6770 1.8000e-
003

0.2012 9.9000e-
004

0.2022 0.0534 9.1000e-
004

0.0543 181.6220 181.6220 4.3900e-
003

4.3200e-
003
183.0205
Total 0.0750 0.1827 0.7358 2.5200e-
003

0.2268 2.0400e-
003

0.2289 0.0607 1.9200e-
003

0.0627 258.3893 258.3893 6.4000e-
003

0.0157 263.2162
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:54 AMPage 13 of 30 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 747 ends

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.3229 0.0000 7.3229 3.4611 0.0000 3.4611 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 0.7749 0.7749 0.7129 0.7129 2,872.691 0 2,872.691
0 0.9291 2,895.918
2 Total 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 7.3229 0.7749 8.0979 3.4611 0.7129 4.1741 2,872.691 0 2,872.691
0 0.9291 2,895.918
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.6403 29.2281 8.9026 0.1493 4.6538 0.3074 4.9612 1.2761 0.2941 1.5702 16,268.46 70 16,268.46
70 0.6941 2.5786 17,054.25
50 Vendor 4.6800e-
003

0.1403 0.0589 7.2000e-
004

0.0256 1.0500e-
003

0.0267 7.3800e-
003

1.0100e-
003

8.3900e-
003

76.7673 76.7673 2.0100e-
003

0.0113 80.1957
Worker 0.0625 0.0377 0.6018 1.6000e-
003

0.1788 8.8000e-
004

0.1797 0.0474 8.1000e-
004

0.0482 161.4418 161.4418 3.9000e-
003

3.8400e-
003
162.6849
Total 0.7075 29.4061 9.5632 0.1516 4.8583 0.3093 5.1676 1.3309 0.2959 1.6268 16,506.67 60 16,506.67
60 0.7000 2.5938 17,297.13
56 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:54 AMPage 14 of 30 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 748 ends

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.2953 0.0000 3.2953 1.5575 0.0000 1.5575 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 0.7749 0.7749 0.7129 0.7129 0.0000 2,872.691 0 2,872.691
0 0.9291 2,895.918
2 Total 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 3.2953 0.7749 4.0702 1.5575 0.7129 2.2704 0.0000 2,872.691 0 2,872.691
0 0.9291 2,895.918
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.6403 29.2281 8.9026 0.1493 4.6538 0.3074 4.9612 1.2761 0.2941 1.5702 16,268.46 70 16,268.46
70 0.6941 2.5786 17,054.25
50 Vendor 4.6800e-
003

0.1403 0.0589 7.2000e-
004

0.0256 1.0500e-
003

0.0267 7.3800e-
003

1.0100e-
003

8.3900e-
003

76.7673 76.7673 2.0100e-
003

0.0113 80.1957
Worker 0.0625 0.0377 0.6018 1.6000e-
003

0.1788 8.8000e-
004

0.1797 0.0474 8.1000e-
004

0.0482 161.4418 161.4418 3.9000e-
003

3.8400e-
003
162.6849
Total 0.7075 29.4061 9.5632 0.1516 4.8583 0.3093 5.1676 1.3309 0.2959 1.6268 16,506.67 60 16,506.67
60 0.7000 2.5938 17,297.13
56 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:54 AMPage 15 of 30 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 749 ends

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0351 1.0523 0.4416 5.3700e-
003

0.1922 7.9100e-
003

0.2001 0.0554 7.5600e-
003

0.0629 575.7545 575.7545 0.0151 0.0850 601.4676
Worker 0.2970 0.1792 2.8583 7.5900e-
003

0.8495 4.1800e-
003

0.8537 0.2253 3.8500e-
003

0.2291 766.8486 766.8486 0.0186 0.0183 772.7533
Total 0.3321 1.2315 3.2999 0.0130 1.0417 0.0121 1.0538 0.2806 0.0114 0.2921 1,342.603 1 1,342.603
1 0.0336 0.1033 1,374.220
9 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:54 AMPage 16 of 30 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 750 ends

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0351 1.0523 0.4416 5.3700e-
003

0.1922 7.9100e-
003

0.2001 0.0554 7.5600e-
003

0.0629 575.7545 575.7545 0.0151 0.0850 601.4676
Worker 0.2970 0.1792 2.8583 7.5900e-
003

0.8495 4.1800e-
003

0.8537 0.2253 3.8500e-
003

0.2291 766.8486 766.8486 0.0186 0.0183 772.7533
Total 0.3321 1.2315 3.2999 0.0130 1.0417 0.0121 1.0538 0.2806 0.0114 0.2921 1,342.603 1 1,342.603
1 0.0336 0.1033 1,374.220
9 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2022 10:54 AMPage 17 of 30 Whittram Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

Page 751 ends

Rancho Cucamonga City CouncilJune 3, 2026

Rancho Cucamonga City Council
June 3, 2026