Agenda — Richmond City Council, June 24, 2025 (part 10 of 10)

June 24, 2025
AGENDA
Community Development REPORT
DATE: June 24, 2025
TO: Mayor Martinez and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lina Velasco, Director of Community Development
Eva Mann, Code Enforcement Manager
Kevin Tisdell, Code Enforcement Officer II
Subject: Amendment of the City’s Tobacco Retailers Moratorium FINANCIAL IMPACT: The urgency ordinance revisions and exceptions, if adopted, would be enforced pursuant to routine code
enforcement efforts, which are included within the City’s budget. The proposed amendment is not expected to
have any fiscal impact on the General Fund.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

April 16, 2024
May 21, 2024
April 1, 2025

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

The City Council is considering amending the scope of
the tobacco retailer moratorium to create a pathway for long-standing Richmond-based tobacco retailers to
continue selling tobacco products while the moratorium
remains in effect. The proposed amendment would
establish a Pathway to Compliance Program for legacy
retailers that meet certain City Council-identified criteria and an expanded opportunity to meet the City’s most
current compliance requirements. The City Council also
directed staff to identify qualifying businesses that meet the criteria and return with a draft ordinance amendment for further consideration.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: RECEIVE a report from staff regarding their findings of potential legacy non-compliant tobacco retailers that
meet City Council’s expressed criteria for an exception to the current tobacco retailers moratorium, and
CONSIDER whether to INTRODUCE an ordinance
1935

Page 2 of 9 ends

June 24, 2025
Amending Ordinance No. 03-25 as amended that would
allow identified long-time Richmond-based retailers who once held a City tobacco retailers license to obtain such license during the moratorium — Community
Development Department/Code Enforcement Division
(Lina Velasco/ Eva Mann/Kevin Tisdell 510-621-1283).

BACKGROUND:

The City Council of the City of Richmond has a well-documented record of regulating the activity of tobacco retailing in the City that protects the public health, safety, and welfare of its residents, and most importantly its youth.

On September 26, 2017, following a presentation by the Youth Tobacco Advocacy & Policy Project, the City Council directed staff to prepare amendments to the Tobacco Retailer License Ordinance to: (1) prohibit the sale of menthol and other flavored products citywide; (2) establish a minimum pack size of 20 for little cigars and cigars; and, (3) restrict new tobacco retailers from opening within 500 feet of existing licensed retailers and within 1,000 feet of youth sensitive areas including schools, playgrounds, parks, and libraries (“location requirements”). Following a study session held on January 30, 2018, the City Council provided additional direction to staff including outreach and education with the Richmond community and tobacco retailers regarding the proposed amendments.

On July 17, 2018, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 20-18 N.S., which, among other things, amended Richmond Municipal Code (“RMC”) Chapter 7.106, prohibiting the sale of menthol and other flavored tobacco products, establishing a minimum pack size for little cigars and cigars, and imposing location requirements on new tobacco retailers from youth populated areas and other licensed retailers. In passing this ordinance, the City Council adopted explicit and extensive findings highlighting how the sale of tobacco, particularly to youth, presents an imminent threat to the public health, safety, and welfare of the residents of the City of Richmond.

With this ordinance, the City Council also addressed how lawfully operating tobacco retailers existing in 2018 would otherwise be ineligible to receive or renew a tobacco retailer license because of the new location requirements from other licensed retailers and youth-populated areas would be allowed to continue their operation. In RMC

7.106.060, which is still in effect today, those lawfully operating tobacco retailers were permitted to “receive or renew a license for that location so long as all the following conditions are met:
(1) The license is timely obtained and is renewed without lapse. (2) The Tobacco Retailer does not commit 3 or more violations of this Chapter at a location within any sixty-month period.
1936

Page 3 of 9 ends

June 24, 2025
(3) The Tobacco Retailer is not closed for business or otherwise suspends Tobacco Retailing for more than sixty (60) consecutive days. (4) The Tobacco Retailer does not substantially change the business premises or business operation. A substantial change to the business operation includes, but is not limited to, the transferring of a location to new Proprietor(s) in an Arm’s Length Transaction and the transferring of a location for which a significant purpose is avoiding the effect of the violations of this Chapter. (5) The Tobacco Retailer retains the right to operate under all other applicable laws.”
In sum, allowing existing tobacco retailers that were operating lawfully prior to the effective date of Ordinance No. 20-18 (August 17, 2018) to continue to operate despite the new location requirements was contingent on meeting all five of these conditions.

Notably, the first threshold condition was maintaining a city tobacco retailer license without lapse.

On September 10, 2019, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 14-19 N.S. amending Richmond Municipal Code Chapter 7.106 - Tobacco Retailer License - to prohibit the sale of electronic cigarettes.

In 2021, the oversight of the Tobacco Retailer License program was transferred from the Richmond Police Department’s Regulatory Unit to the Code Enforcement Division of the Community Development Department.

In late 2023, the City began to notice an increase in the establishment of new tobacco retailers that failed to obtain proper licensing. Following these complaints regarding the proliferation of unlicensed tobacco retailers, locations of tobacco retailer businesses, and the harmful effects of tobacco on the health, safety and welfare of city residents, especially youth, on April 15, 2024, the City Council adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 03-24 N.S., which placed a temporary 45-day moratorium on the issuance of any new permits, license, or entitlement for any new tobacco retailer within the City. On May 21, 2024, the City Council adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 05-24 N.S. extending the temporary moratorium to April 15, 2025, to provide staff sufficient time to study the issue and propose amendments to the Municipal Code (Attachment 1).

DISCUSSION:

On April 1, 2025, City staff requested that the Council consider extending the temporary moratorium for another 12 months, until April 15, 2026, to allow additional time to complete tasks related to creating a new regulatory structure for tobacco retailers. The City Council unanimously passed Ordinance No. 09-25, which extended the moratorium until April 15, 2026 (Attachment 2).

However, when considering the ordinance to extend the moratorium, the City Council discussed the impacts the moratorium may have on long-time Richmond-based retailers, who once held a City tobacco retailers license, and the potential of creating a 1937

Page 4 of 9 ends

June 24, 2025
pathway for these long-standing Richmond-based tobacco retailers to obtain a City tobacco retailer license while the moratorium remains in effect. The proposed amendment would establish a Pathway to Compliance Program for existing legacy tobacco retailers that:
 Held a valid City of Richmond tobacco retailer license at any point between 2018 and 2024,
 Have continuously maintained a valid City of Richmond business license,  Hold a valid State Tobacco Retailers license,
 Have the same ownership as when previously licensed as a City of Richmond Tobacco Retailer, and
 Have not been found to be engaging in illicit activities, such as selling cannabis, and other drugs.

The Council directed staff to identify tobacco retailers who met the outlined criteria and therefore qualified their businesses to be included in the Pathway to Compliance and draft the proposed ordinance amendment for further consideration.

Summary of Analysis of Unlicensed Tobacco Retailers
Based on direction received from the City Council, staff conducted a review of all the tobacco retailers that have no city tobacco retailers license (referred to as “unlicensed tobacco retailers”) using several criteria including: Current business owner versus previously licensed tobacco retailer owner name, CA State tobacco license status, City of Richmond business license status, and whether they once held a City of Richmond tobacco retailer license between 2018-2024 (Attachment 3).

As part of its analysis, City staff is also providing information regarding whether the unlicensed tobacco retailer would meet the current location requirements, which imposes a 500-foot buffer from another licensed tobacco retailer and a 1,000-foot buffer from a youth populated area. The analysis also includes which Council District the unlicensed tobacco retailer is located in.

Furthermore, the chart analyzes 51 unlicensed tobacco retailers, focusing on their compliance with the criteria specified above and other data the City Council may want to consider in their decision to amend the moratorium. Since the last hearing, City staff has confirmed a 52nd unlicensed business, which a Cease-and-Desist Order is being prepared for delivery.

The key findings are:

1. Licensing and Permits:
 Of the 51 unlicensed tobacco retailers, 25 have a current City business license and 45 have a State Tobacco license (based on data provided by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration in November of 2024).
1938

Page 5 of 9 ends

June 24, 2025
 Of the 51 unlicensed tobacco retailers, 22 tobacco retailers have both the State Tobacco license and City business license.

2. Violations Discovered During Inspection(s):
 8 of the 51 unlicensed tobacco retailers have had violations related to selling cannabis or other drugs
 An additional 8 businesses were found to have other violations including out-of-state tobacco, untaxed tobacco, and retailing without a State tobacco license. There are a total of 16 unlicensed retailers that have been cited for violations.
 Due to limited staffing and time constraints, the tobacco taskforce has not inspected every unlicensed business. 25 unlicensed tobacco retailers have not been inspected and are scheduled for inspections post this staff report.

3. Ownership:
 Several previously licensed tobacco retailers have undergone changes in ownership. Per Richmond Municipal Code Section 7.106.110(a), a tobacco retailer license is nontransferable from one person to another or from one location to another. “A tobacco retailer’s license may not be transferred from one person to another or from one location to another. A new tobacco retailer’s license is required whenever a tobacco retailing location has a change in proprietor(s).”
 15 of the 51 unlicensed tobacco retailers are the same owner names that were registered on the previously issued City Tobacco Retailer license between 2018-2024.

4. Compliance with Cease & Desist Orders issued by the City  Visual tobacco inspections were conducted on April 21 and 22, 2025, to determine which of the unlicensed tobacco retailers have stopped selling tobacco products. The inspections found that 31 unlicensed retailers continue to sell tobacco products, while 18 have stopped selling tobacco products. Two (2) businesses appear to have closed.

5. Geographical Distribution and Analysis of Retailers by Council Districts:
 Two to three times more tobacco retailers are located in Districts 1 and 3 in comparison to all other districts. Within these districts, unlicensed Tobacco Retailers outnumber licensed Tobacco Retailers.  Districts 2 and 4 have the least number of tobacco retailers. 1939

Page 6 of 9 ends

June 24, 2025
Table A. Tobacco Retailers by Council District
Council District Unlicensed Licensed District Total
Brown, D1 12 9 21
Zepeda, D2 5 4 9
Robinson, D3 18 6 24
Bana, D4 0 1 1
Wilson, D5 7 4 11
Jimenez, D6 9 7 16
TOTAL 51 31 82

6. Compliance with Location Requirements
 18 of the unlicensed tobacco retailers would comply with the location requirement to be 500 feet from another licensed tobacco retailer.  Three (3) of the 51 unlicensed tobacco retailers comply with the requirement to be 1,000 feet from youth-identified areas.  None of the unlicensed tobacco retailers would comply with both required location requirements.

7. Qualification for Potential License Exception
 The City Council set the following criteria to be eligible for the potential Pathway to Compliance to obtain a tobacco retailing license:

1. Held a valid City of Richmond tobacco retailer license at any point between 2018 and 2024

2. Have continuously maintained a valid City of Richmond business license

3. Hold a valid State Tobacco Retailers license

4. Have the same ownership as when previously licensed as a City of Richmond Tobacco Retailer

5. Have not been found to be engaging in illicit activities.  9 unlicensed tobacco retailers qualify for the City Council’s potential pathway to compliance license based on the criteria above; however, if the City Council wanted to expand the compliance pathway to not consider the owners names matching the original license, an additional 9 retailers would qualify, making the total of 18 legacy businesses qualifying to be a part of the Pathway to Compliance. Assuming all qualifying businesses apply to obtain the City’s Tobacco Retailer license, the total licensed business would increase from 32 to 50 businesses. 1940

Page 7 of 9 ends

June 24, 2025
Table B. Eligible Tobacco Retailers for Exception by Council District Council District Using 5 criteria Using 4 criteria District Total Brown, D1 3 3 9+3=12
Zepeda, D2 1 1 4+2=6
Robinson, D3 3 9 6+9=15
Bana, D4 0 0 1+0=1
Wilson, D5 1 1 4+1=5
Jimenez, D6 1 4 7+4=11
TOTAL 9 18 50
Overall, the analysis highlights multiple factors that must be attended to in order for tobacco retailers to meet the Pathway to Compliance Program criteria set by the City Council, including the need for regular tobacco retailer education on requirements and applicable laws.

The City Council’s adoption and subsequent extensions of the tobacco retailer license moratorium—through Urgency Ordinance Nos. 03-24 N.S., 05-24 N.S., and 09-25 N.S.—have been driven by the City Council’s compelling and ongoing need to protect the health, safety, and welfare of Richmond residents, which is consistent with past actions taken by the Council. The moratorium was enacted to pause the proliferation of tobacco retail operations while City staff develop comprehensive regulatory strategies in response to identified patterns of noncompliance, illicit activity, and public health risks.

Summary of Proposed Moratorium Amendments to Tobacco Moratorium The proposed ordinance amends the City of Richmond’s existing tobacco moratorium (Urgency Ordinance No. 03-24, as extended) by establishing criteria and a Pathway to Compliance Program for qualifying legacy tobacco retailers (Attachment 4).

Specifically, the amendment:

1. Creates a Pathway to Compliance Program Criteria:

Qualifying tobacco retailers would be exempt from the moratorium and be allowed to obtain a City tobacco retailer license if they meet all of the following criteria:
a. Held a valid City tobacco license at any time between 2018 and 2024. b. Maintained a valid City of Richmond business license continuously from 2018 to the present.
c. Current owner and previously licensed owner are the same. d. Hold a State Tobacco License.
e. Have not been issued violations for illicit activities.

These tobacco retailers would be given additional opportunities through the Pathway to Compliance Program to meet the locational standards specified in the current 1941

Page 8 of 9 ends

June 24, 2025
ordinance, and would be considered as a businesses that did not have a lapsed license.

2. Reaffirmation of Moratorium:

All other provisions of the original and extended moratorium remain in effect through April 15, 2026, unless rescinded earlier. No new tobacco retailers outside the allowed Pathway to Compliance criteria may be permitted.

The subject ordinance requires a first and second reading and would be effective 30 days from adoption. If introduced tonight, the second reading is scheduled for July 1, 2025, meaning the qualifying legacy retailers would be eligible to obtain a City tobacco retailer license after August 1, 2025.

Offering a Pathway to Compliance Program and Criteria, in lieu, of the full moratorium requires City Council consideration given the public health goals the City Council is balancing with the economic impact that the tobacco moratorium has on unlicensed tobacco retailers, especially those businesses that have been operating in the city for many years. To that end, staff provides two options for the City Council to consider:

Option 1: Maintain the Moratorium as Passed: Pause on adopting the Pathway to Compliance amendment to the Moratorium.

Rationale:
 Preserves the integrity, uniformity, and public health intent of the moratorium  Ensures consistency with prior Council actions aimed at curbing youth access to tobacco and reducing public health risks
 Avoids complications from determining eligibility based on legacy status  Prevents administrative liability, uneven enforcement, and potential repetitive non-compliance behaviors of tobacco retailers
 Reinforces the seriousness of regulatory reform by signaling a clear pause while the City staff finalizes and presents to the City Council long-term regulatory strategies
 Encourages retailers to consider and rely on business activity, other than tobacco retailing, that better serves the community’s health, safety, and welfare
Option 2: Establish a Pathway to Compliance Program for Legacy Tobacco Retailers: Amend the moratorium to create a Pathway to Compliance Program and Criteria for legacy tobacco retailers operating prior to the moratorium to obtain a City tobacco retailer license.

Rationale:
 Balances the City’s public health strategic goals with economic, equity, and efficacy considerations for legacy tobacco retailers
1942

Page 9 of 9 ends

June 24, 2025
 Offers a Pathway to Compliance Program and criteria to unlicensed tobacco retailers who have contributed to the local economy and have a legacy of positive investments in the City of Richmond
 Provides a final opportunity for unlicensed tobacco retailers to come into compliance and demonstrate a commitment to regulatory compliance going forward
 Helps mitigate concerns from unlicensed tobacco retailers who may feel unfairly penalized by the moratorium
 Considers retailer experience and/or hardship with the City’s licensing requirements and processes
CONCLUSION:

Ultimately, the decision to provide pathways to compliance, in lieu of the moratorium, lies with the City Council and reflects a broader policy choice about how best to balance public health priorities with the economic, equity, and efficacy realities facing unlicensed tobacco retailers. Each option presents trade-offs: maintaining the moratorium underscores the City's strong public health stance and simplifies enforcement, while a Pathway to Compliance Program recognizes the challenges faced by legacy tobacco retailers and offers a path to compliance, demonstrating a commitment to uphold the strategic goals of the City. City staff seek direction from the City Council on how to proceed, ensuring that future regulations align with both community well-being and equitable economic opportunities.

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1 – Moratorium Ordinance Nos. 03-24 N.S., 05-24 N.S., and 09-25 N.S.

Attachment 2 – City Council Meeting Minutes - April 1, 2025 Attachment 3 – Table of Unlicensed Retailers Analysis
Attachment 4 – Draft Ordinance Amending Moratorium
1943
ORDINANCE NO. 03-24 N.S.

AN URGENCY ORDINANCE, PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND, ESTABLISHING A

TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ON ALL NEW TOBACCO RETAILERS WITHIN THE

CITY OF RICHMOND PENDING THE STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT OF
REASONABLE REGULATIONS; AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF WHEREAS, the City has seen a proliferation of tobacco retailer businesses within the City;
WHEREAS, the City is concerned about this recent proliferation of tobacco retailer businesses, locations of tobacco retailer businesses, and the harmful effects of tobacco on the health, safety, and welfare of City residents and especially youth; WHEREAS, the City has no specific regulations for tobacco retailer businesses aimed at protecting minors, such as a distance requirement from schools and/or youth-oriented areas; WHEREAS, this temporary moratorium will provide staff with the opportunity to study various options to regulate tobacco retailer businesses; and, WHEREAS, Government Code section 65858 provides that to protect against any current and immediate threat to the public health, safety, or welfare, the City Council may adopt as an urgency measure an interim ordinance prohibiting any uses that may be in conflict with a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal that the City plans to study.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Richmond does hereby ordain as follows:

SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct and are adopted as the City Council's findings.

SECTION 2: Purpose and Authority.

In the interest of protecting the health, safety, and welfare of the residents in the City of Richmond, it is the purpose and intent of this ordinance to place a temporary moratorium on the issuance of any new permit, license, or other entitlement for any tobacco retailer in the City of Richmond. The City Council has authority to adopt this ordinance pursuant to California Constitution Article XI, Section 7 and Government Code section 65858 as an urgency measure prohibiting any use that may be in conflict with a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal that the City is considering or studying.

SECTION 3: Findings.

A. Smoking and use of tobacco products, particularly by persons under eighteen years of age ("minors"), poses a significant health hazard to the user and persons in proximity to the user, including, without limitation, nicotine addiction, disease, and premature death.

B. The City of Richmond has a significant interest in discouraging tobacco use by minors and discouraging the sale or distribution of tobacco products to minors, including vape pens and devices, e-cigarettes, and flavored tobacco products.

C. The City has a significant interest in preserving the health, safety, and welfare of its residents, and in particular its minor residents, in considering enactment of additional regulations on the sale and distribution of tobacco products.

D. There is a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety, or welfare with respect to the sale and distribution of tobacco products within the City, including access to such products by minors, and the approval of additional permits, licenses, and/or any other entitlement for new tobacco retailers would result in a further threat to public health, safety, or welfare.

E. This urgency ordinance is necessary to promote the immediate preservation of the peace, health, and safety of the public against the potential detrimental health impacts of tobacco smoking, particularly as concerns minors, in order to allow the City an opportunity to study this issue and Ord. No. 03-24 N.S.

Page I of3
1944
develop and adopt additional appropriate regulations for the sale and distribution of tobacco products.

Section 4: Environmental Review/California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

This ordinance is intended to preserve the status quo, and it will not cause a direct physical change in the environment, nor a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. The enactment of this ordinance, therefore, does not constitute the approval of a project under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), and it is exempt from CEQA. (Pub. Res. Code § 21065, CEQA Guidelines§§ 15060(c),(2)(3); 1506l(b)(3); 15064(d)(3); 15378(a).) Section 5: Definitions.

As used herein the following definitions shall apply:

A. "Person" shall mean any individual natural person, firm, partnership, joint venture, limited liability company, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, business trust, receiver, trustee, syndicate, or any other group or combination acting as a unit.

B. "Tobacco retailer" shall have the same meaning as set forth in Richmond Municipal Code section 7.106.030.

Section 6: Moratorium on New Permits, Licenses, and Land Use Entitlements.

A. During the term of this ordinance, any new tobacco retailer shall be prohibited in all zoning districts and lands within the City of Richmond. No application for any permit, license, or land use entitlement shall be granted or approved for any new tobacco retailer in any zoning districts or lands within the City of Richmond.

B. Notwithstanding any other provision of this ordinance, any person who lawfully holds an existing permit, license, and/or land use entitlement for an existing and lawfully operating smoke shop and/or tobacco retailer in the City of Richmond as of the effective date of this ordinance may continue to lawfully operate under that existing permit, license, and/or entitlement, and may apply for the renewal of any such existing permit, license, and/or entitlement, which renewal may be approved or denied by the City under the standards governing such permit, license, and/or entitlement under existing law. Nothing herein shall limit the authority of the City to revoke or suspend any existing license, permit, and/or entitlement as authorized under existing law.

Section 7: Term of Ordinance.

This ordinance shall be in effect from the date of adoption for a period of forty-five (45) days, unless it is extended pursuant to Government Code section 65858(a) or other applicable law, as approved by the City Council.

Section 8: No Mandatory Duty of Care.

This ordinance is not intended to and shall not be construed or given effect in a manner that imposes upon the City or any officer or employee thereof a mandatory duty of care towards persons and property within or without the City, so as to provide a basis of civil liability for damages, except as otherwise imposed by law.

Section 9: Severability.

If any provision of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of the ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are severable. This City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion thereof and intends that the invalid portions should be severed and the balance of the ordinance be enforced.

Section 10: Effective Date and Publication.

This ordinance, passed by at least a four-fifths vote of the City Council, is declared to be an urgency ordinance for preserving the public health, safety and welfare and shall take effect and be enforced immediately upon adoption.

Ord. No. 03-24 N.S.

Page 2 ends

1945
I hereby certify that the foregoing Urgency Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Richmond was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting thereof held April 16, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTENTIONS:

ABSENT:

Approved:

EDUARDO MARTINEZ
Mayor
Approved as to form:

DA VE ALESHIRE
City Attorney
State of California }
County of Contra Costa
City of Richmond }
Councilmembers Bana, McLaughlin, Willis, Zepeda, Vice
Mayor Jimenez, and Mayor Martinez.

None.

Councilmember Doria Robinson.
: ss.

PAMELA CHRISTIAN

CLERK OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
(SEAL)
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Urgency Ordinance No. 03-24 N.S., passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Richmond at a regular meeting held on April 16, 2024.

Pamela Christian, Clerk of the City of Richmond
Ord. No. 03-24 N.S.

Page 3 ends

1946
1947
1948
1949
1950
1951
1952
cc01Apr2025 – ud/prc

Page 1 of 12 ends

RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA,
April 1, 2025, 3:30 p.m.

Community Services Building
440 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, CA 94804
_____________________________________________________________________ A. OPEN SESSION TO HEAR PUBLIC COMMENT BEFORE CLOSED SESSION The Open Session was called to order at 3:30 p.m. by Mayor Eduardo Martinez.

B. ROLL CALL

Present: Councilmembers Jamelia Brown, Doria Robinson, Sue Wilson, Vice Mayor Cesar Zepeda, and Mayor Eduardo Martinez. Absent: Councilmembers Soheila Bana and Claudia Jimenez were absent for the entire meeting.

C. JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND/SURPLUS PROPERTY

AUTHORITY MEETING
C.1 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION (Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) or (3) of Subdivision (d) [as applicable] of Government Code Section 54956.9) • One case
C.2 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Government Code
Section 54957.6)
• Agency Representatives: Sharrone Taylor, Jack Hughes, Lisa Charbonneau Employee organizations:

1. SEIU Local 1021 Full Time Unit and Part Time Unit

2. IFPTE Local 21 Mid-Level Management Unit and Executive Management Units

3. Richmond Police Officers Association RPOA

4. Richmond Police Management Association RPMA

5. IAFF Local 188

6. Richmond Fire Management Association RFMA
C.3 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (paragraph (1) of Subdivision [d] of Government Code Section 54956.9) • Winehaven Legacy LLC v. City of Richmond
• Guidiville Rancheria of California, et al. v. United States of America, et al.

SURPLUS PROPERTY AUTHORITY
C.4 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (paragraph (1) of Subdivision [d] of Government Code Section 54956.9) • Surplus Property Authority of the City of Richmond v. Riggers Loft Wine Company
1953
cc01Apr2025 – ud/prc

Page 2 of 12 ends

D. PUBLIC COMMENT BEFORE CLOSED SESSION (limited to items on the Closed Session agenda only)
Cordell Hindler gave comments regarding Riggers Loft and spoke in support of favorable union negotiations for city employees.

E. ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION
Open Session adjourned at 3:33 p.m. Closed Session adjourned at 5:21 p.m.

F. REGULAR MEETING OF THE RICHMOND HOUSING AUTHORITY
The meeting was called to order at 5:24 p.m. by Chair Eduardo Martinez.

G. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Chair Eduardo Martinez led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.

H. ROLL CALL

Present: Commissioners Jamelia Brown, Doria Robinson, Sue Wilson, Vice Chair Zepeda, Chair Eduardo Martinez, and Tenant Commissioner Scott. Absent:

Commissioners Soheila Bana and Claudia Jimenez were absent for the entire meeting.

I. STATEMENT OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None.

J. AGENDA REVIEW
None.

K. HOUSING AUTHORITY OPEN FORUM
Cordell Hindler stated that the City Council should approve the Housing Authority Consent Calendar.

L. HOUSING AUTHORITY CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion by Chair Eduardo Martinez
Seconded by Commissioner Doria Robinson
Ayes (6): Commissioners Jamelia Brown, Doria Robinson, Sue Wilson, Vice Chair Cesar Zepeda, Chair Eduardo Martinez, and Tenant Commissioner Scott Absent (2): Commissioners Soheila Bana and Claudia Jimenez Passed
L.1 Contract with Door and Window Guard Systems, Inc. for Installation at Nystrom Village
ADOPT a resolution authorizing a contract for $150,000 with Door and Window Guard Systems, Inc., beginning April 1, 2025, and ending June 30, 2028, for installation and removal of steel door and window guards at vacant units located within Nystrom Village – Richmond Housing Authority (Gregory Palomino 510- 621-1300/Antoinette Terrell 510-620-6784).

Adopted Resolution No. 2207.

L.2 On Call Contract with Net Electric for services at Nystrom Village ADOPT a resolution to approve a contract with Net Electric for on-call the residential electric services in the amount not to exceed $60,000 from April 1, 2025, to April 1, 2028, with the option to extend for up to two additional years at $20,000 per year for a total not to exceed amount of $100,000 to support unit 1954
cc01Apr2025 – ud/prc

Page 3 of 12 ends

turnover activities and work orders at Nystrom Village - Richmond Housing Authority (Antoinette Terrell/Gregory Palomino 510-621-1361).

Adopted Resolution No. 2208.

L.3 Housing Authority Meeting Minutes
APPROVE the minutes of the December 3, 2024, regular meeting and the December 17, 2024, and January 21, 2025, special meetings - City Clerk's Office (Pamela Christian 510-620-6513).

M. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 5:26 p.m.

N. REGULAR MEETING OF THE RICHMOND CITY COUNCIL
The meeting was called to order at 5:27 p.m. by Mayor Eduardo Martinez.

O. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
P. ROLL CALL

Q. STATEMENT OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Councilmember Robinson stated a conflict of interest on Item V.3.b - International Travel Request for TCC Project Coordinator. Councilmember Robinson was the executive director of Urban Tilth, who was a recipient of a TCC grant. The item was voted on separate from the other items on the Consent Calendar. City Attorney Dave Aleshire advised Councilmember Robinson to leave the dais at the time the item would be voted on by the City Council.

R. AGENDA REVIEW
None.

S. REPORT FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY OF FINAL DECISIONS MADE

DURING CLOSED SESSION
C.1 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION (Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) or (3) of Subdivision (d) [as applicable] of Government Code Section 54956.9) • One case
The item was discussed. No reportable action was taken.

C.2 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Government Code
Section 54957.6)
• Agency Representatives: Sharrone Taylor, Jack Hughes, Lisa Charbonneau Employee organizations:

1. SEIU Local 1021 Full Time Unit and Part Time Unit

2. IFPTE Local 21 Mid-Level Management Unit and Executive Management Units

3. Richmond Police Officers Association RPOA

4. Richmond Police Management Association RPMA
1955
cc01Apr2025 – ud/prc

Page 4 of 12 ends

5. IAFF Local 188

6. Richmond Fire Management Association RFMA
A status report was given, and direction was given to the city negotiators. No reportable action was taken.

C.3 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (paragraph (1) of Subdivision [d] of Government Code Section 54956.9) • Winehaven Legacy LLC v. City of Richmond• Guidiville Rancheria of California, et al. v. United States of America, et al.

Item was not discussed.

T. REPORT FROM THE CITY MANAGER (public comment allowed under Open Forum)
City Manager Shasa Curl presented the report.

Link to presentation: City Manager Report
T.1 NEW EMPLOYEE REPORT - 1st Tuesday
Human Resources Director, Sharrone Taylor presented the report.

Link to presentation: New Employee Report
U. OPEN FORUM FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
(public comment on items that remain on the Consent Calendar or items not on the agenda - limited to 2 minutes unless otherwise specified - Back and forth dialogue with the Council is prohibited)
Cordell Hindler stated that a portion of the Chevron settlement funds should be used for fixing buildings in disrepair. Mr. Hindler also presented proclamations to the city council.

Mark Wassberg gave comments regarding transgenders.

Jamin Pursell invited everyone to the Richmond Rainbow Pride event on June 1, 2025, at Richmond Civic Center. Mr. Pursell also requested that the increase in dog-biting incidents was investigated.

Steve Price gave comments regarding multi-modal mobility and stated there was a Go Green Mobility Fair at the El Cerrito Bart Station on April 26, 2025, from 11 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.

V. CITY COUNCIL CONSENT CALENDAR
(All items placed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and noncontroversial. These items will be enacted upon together with a motion and second, without discussion, of any member of the City Council, and each item shall be deemed to have received the action recommended.)
1956
cc01Apr2025 – ud/prc

Page 5 of 12 ends

Councilmember Robinson stated a conflict of interest on Item V.3.b - International Travel Request for TCC Project Coordinator. This item was voted on separate from the rest of the consent calendar and Councilmember Robinson left the dais at that time of the vote.

Motion by Councilmember Sue Wilson
Seconded by Councilmember Jamelia Brown
Ayes (5): Councilmember Jamelia Brown, Councilmember Doria Robinson, Councilmember Sue Wilson, Vice Mayor Cesar Zepeda, and Mayor Eduardo Martinez Absent (2): Councilmember Soheila Bana, and Councilmember Claudia Jimenez Passed
V.1 City Attorney's Office
V.1.a Legal Services Agreement with Boucher Law PC
APPROVE a legal services agreement with Boucher Law P.C. for a term of November 1, 2021, through December 31, 2025, for a total amount not to exceed amount of $125,000, for confidential personnel investigation matters – City Attorney’s Office/Human Resources Department (Dave Aleshire/Shannon Moore/Nickie Mastay/Sharrone Taylor 510-620-6600).

V.1.b Fourth Amendment to the Legal Services Agreement (“LSA”) with Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP.

APPROVE a fourth amendment to the Legal Services Agreement with Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP, in the amount of $110,000 for a total contract amount not to exceed $250,000, with a term ending on December 30, 2026, to continue representing the City in municipal law matters, including personnel matters and litigation – City Attorney’s Office (Kimberly Chin 510-620-6709/Shannon Moore 510-620-6509).

V.2 City Clerk's Office
V.2.a Meeting Minutes
APPROVE the minutes of the February 18, 2025, and February 25, 2025, regular City Council meetings - City Clerk's Office (Pamela Christian 510- 620-6513).

V.3 Community Development
V.3.a Contract Amendment No. 2 with Civica Law Group, APC APPROVE second amendment to the Legal Services Agreement with Civica Law Group, APC to increase the contract amount by $650,000, for a total contract amount not to exceed $1,135,600.44, for a term through June 30, 2027, to provide legal representation, advice, and assistance to the City of Richmond regarding code enforcement matters and to continue the City’s Health and Safey Receivership Program - Community Development Department (Lina Velasco/Eva Mann 510-620-6841).

V.3.b International Travel Request for TCC Project Coordinator APPROVE international travel for Transformative Climate Communities Project Coordinator Ms. Beatriz Guerrero Auna to attend the 2025 Urban Land Institute (ULI) Health Leaders Network Convening in the 1957
cc01Apr2025 – ud/prc

Page 6 of 12 ends

Netherlands not to exceed $2,250 in funding - Community Development Department (Lina Velasco/Beatriz Guerrero 510-620-5450).

Councilmember Robinson recused herself from voting on this item due to conflict of interest and left the dais during the council's vote on the item.

Motion by Vice Mayor Cesar Zepeda
Seconded by Councilmember Sue Wilson
Ayes (4): Councilmember Jamelia Brown, Councilmember Sue Wilson, Vice Mayor Cesar Zepeda, and Mayor Eduardo Martinez
Absent (3): Councilmember Soheila Bana, Councilmember Claudia Jimenez, and Councilmember Doria Robinson
Passed
V.3.c Contract Amendment No.1 with Contra Costa County Health for ERF–2R Program Project Management
APPROVE a contract amendment No.1 with Contra Costa Health’s Health, Housing, and Human Services (H3) Department to increase the contract amount by $2,875,440, for a total contract amount not to exceed $4,306,079, for a term extending through June 30, 2026, to provide project management, rapid rehousing services, and shelter bed services for the City’s Encampment Resolution Funding Round 2 project – Community Development Department (Lina Velasco/Jesus M. Morales 510-620-6649).

V.4 Library and Community Services
V.4.a Richmond Workforce Development Board Application as a Adult and Dislocated Worker Career Services Provider
APPROVE the submittal of the application to the Governor of the State of California for the Richmond Workforce Development Board to serve as a Adult and Dislocated Worker Career Services Provider – Community Service Department, Employment and Training Division (Tamara Walker 510-307-8006).

V.4.b Richmond Workforce Development Board Recertification Application APPROVE the submission of the California Workforce Development Board Local Area Subsequent Designation and Local Board Recertification Application for the Richmond Workforce Development Board for Program Year 2025-27 – Community Services Department, Employment and Training Division (Tamara Walker 510-307-8006).

V.5 Mayor's Office
V.5.a Reappointment of Tomasa Espinoza to the Richmond Rent Board REAPPOINT Tomasa Espinoza to the Richmond Rent Board, term expires March 31, 2027 – Mayor’s Office (Mayor Eduardo Martinez 510-620- 6503).

V.5.b Reappointment of Elena Velazquez to the Richmond Youth Council REAPPOINT Elena Velazquez to the Richmond Youth Council, term expires October 1, 2025 – Mayor’s Office (Mayor Eduardo Martinez 510- 620-6503).
1958
cc01Apr2025 – ud/prc

Page 7 of 12 ends

V.5.c Amend Ordinance No. 08-21 N.S. to Establish a Biannual Report from the Richmond Arts and Culture Division Manager
DIRECT the City Attorney’s Office to draft an amendment to Ordinance No. 08-21 N.S. requiring the arts and culture division manager to provide a biannual written report and deliver an in-person presentation to the Richmond City Council, with the proposed amendment to be prepared within 45 days - Mayor's Office (Mayor Eduardo Martinez 510-621-1275), Councilmember Claudia Jimenez (510-620-6565), and Councilmember Doria Robinson (510-620-6565).

V.5.d Declaring April 2025 as Alcohol Awareness Month
PROCLAMATION Declaring April 2025 as Alcohol Awareness Month – Mayor’s Office (Mayor Eduardo Martinez 510-620-6503).

V.6 Public Works
V.6.a Accept and Appropriate One Bay Area Grant 3 Funds and Contract with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc..

ADOPT a resolution to ACCEPT and APPROPRIATE One Bay Area Grant 3 funds in the amount of $1,674,702.81 to the Bayview to BART Improvement Project; and AUTHORIZE the city manager or her designee to execute a contract in an amount not to exceed $565,116.36, with a term beginning March 25, 2025, through December 31, 2026, with KimleyHorn and Associates, Inc. for engineering design services for the Bayview to BART Project – Public Works Department (Hillal Hamdan 510-621- 1612/Robert Armijo 510-620-5477/Daniel Chavarria 510-620-5478).

Adopted Resolution No. 29-25.

V.6.b Appropriate Measure J Funds for Blue Curb Policy Development ADOPT a resolution to ALLOCATE and APPROPRIATE funds in the amount of $120,000 from Measure J Fund 2002 to develop a comprehensive policy for providing on-street blue curb parking spaces - Public Works Department (Janney Lockman 510-307-8097/Robert Armijo 510-620-5477/Daniel Chavarria 510-620-5478).

Adopted Resolution No. 30-25.

V.6.c Preparation of the Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 for the Marina Bay Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District
ADOPT a resolution ordering the preparation of the annual engineer’s report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 regarding improvements and costs for the Marina Bay Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District – Public Works Department (Jason Lacey 510-620-6920).

Adopted Resolution No. 31-25.

W. PUBLIC HEARINGS - NOT BEFORE 5:00 P.M.

W.1 Extension of Moratorium on New Tobacco Retailers
City Clerk Pamela Christian announced that it was time set pursuant to public notice to hold a public hearing to ADOPT an urgency ordinance, pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, extending the temporary moratorium on the issuance of new permit, license, or entitlement for any new tobacco retailer in the City of Richmond for an additional 12 months, until April 15, 2026. This 1959
cc01Apr2025 – ud/prc

Page 8 of 12 ends

ordinance is intended to preserve the status quo, and it will not cause a direct physical change in the environment, nor a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. The enactment of this ordinance, therefore, does not constitute the approval of a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), and it is exempt from CEQA. (Pub. Res. Code § 21065, CEQA Guidelines §§ 15060(c)(2)(3); 15061(b)(3); 15064(d)(3); 15378(a)) - Community Development Department (Lina Velasco/Eva Mann 510-621-1220).

Planning Director Lina Velasco and Acting Planning Manager Avery Stark presented a PowerPoint.

Link to presentation: Tobacco Moratorium
Mayor Martinez opened the public hearing. Cordell Hindler, Mark Wassberg, Aslum, Oscar Garcia, Ahmad Anderson, Kathleen Sullivan, Monica Marquez, Arto Rinteela, and Ali Wohlgemuth gave comments.

Mayor Martinez closed the public hearing. Discussion ensued.

There were currently 83 smoke shops operating in Richmond and of those, 51 did not have a valid tobacco retailer license.

A public workshop regarding tobacco retailers would be held virtually and in the City Council Chambers on April 9, 2025.

The city council requested the following: that staff develop additional regulations; determine the definition of tobacco retailer and of new retailers; ensure compliance with proximity of businesses to each other and schools; educate vendors on new tobacco laws; look into how the city can enforce the closure of businesses who are out of compliance; develop a reasonable staffing plan to perform enforcement in house; return with a list of businesses with lapsed licenses to decide if they could be given the opportunity to come into compliance.

A motion was made by Councilmember Robinson, seconded by Councilmember Wilson to adopt the urgency ordinance to extend the moratorium with the following conditions: that any business that had a previous tobacco license between 2018-2024 would have an opportunity to renew that license even if a renewal period was missed, but the business must have a valid business license to be eligible for that condition and; must be the same owner and was not transferable; extend the moratorium for all others; and that staff return with a list of retailers that could be granted conditional permits who were not selling illicit products and support the effort to protect the health and wellness of the community; legacy tobacco vendors with a valid business license would be allowed to sell during the moratorium; any business that was discovered selling illegal goods would not be offered the same opportunity.

Mayor Martinez offered a friendly amendment that staff look into the billing process so that businesses would have an opportunity to pay their license fee in a timely manner.

Councilmember Robinson and Wilson accepted the friendly amendment.

Adopted Ordinance No. 09-25 N.S.

Motion by Councilmember Doria Robinson
Seconded by Councilmember Sue Wilson
1960
cc01Apr2025 – ud/prc

Page 9 of 12 ends

Ayes (5): Councilmember Jamelia Brown, Councilmember Doria Robinson, Councilmember Sue Wilson, Vice Mayor Cesar Zepeda, and Mayor Eduardo Martinez
Absent (2): Councilmember Soheila Bana, and Councilmember Claudia Jimenez Passed
W.2 Extension of the Keller Beach Sanitary Sewer Moratorium (2025-2027) – Adoption of Urgency Ordinance
City Clerk Pamela Christian announced that it was time set pursuant to public notice to hold a public hearing to ADOPT an ordinance, pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, extending the existing moratorium (22 months and 15 days) on the issuance of building permits requiring a new sewer connection to the Keller Beach Sanitary Sewer (KBSS) and declaring the urgency thereof pursuant to Government Code Section 65858. The ordinance is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as it maintains the existing physical environment and prevents changes in the environment, thereby having no potential for direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(a)). It is also exempt under Guidelines Sections 15060(c)(2), as the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. There is no possibility that adoption of this ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment because it maintains the existing condition of the environment Section 15061(b)(3) - Public Works Department (Daniel Chavarria 510-620-5478/ Robert Armijo 510-620- 5477/Mary Phelps 510-621-1269).

Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer Robert Armijo and Water Resource Division Manager Mary Phelps presented a PowerPoint.

Link to presentation: Keller Beach Sanitary Sewer Moratorium Mayor Martinez opened the public hearing open.

Joseph John, Norm Hantzsche, and Don Mill gave comments.

Mayor Martinez closed the public hearing. Discussion ensued.

A correction would be made to the second whereas of the ordinance to correct:

WHEREAS, on February 18, 2925, to February 18, 2025.

A motion was made Mayor Martinez, seconded by Councilmember Wilson to drop the urgency clause and return with a second reading and approve the item as is. Discussion ensued and Mayor Martinez withdrew his motion.

Motion by Councilmember Sue Wilson
Seconded by Mayor Eduardo Martinez
A motion was made to adopt the ordinance. The motion failed because a twothirds vote was required to adopt an urgency ordinance. Further discussion ensued.

Ayes (4): Councilmember Jamelia Brown, Councilmember Doria Robinson, Councilmember Sue Wilson, and Mayor Eduardo Martinez
Noes (1): Vice Mayor Cesar Zepeda
Absent (2): Councilmember Soheila Bana, and Councilmember Claudia Jimenez 1961
cc01Apr2025 – ud/prc

Page 10 of 12 ends

Passed
Motion by Vice Mayor Cesar Zepeda
Seconded by Councilmember Jamelia Brown
A motion was made to reconsider the failed vote. Further discussion ensued.

Ayes (5): Councilmember Jamelia Brown, Councilmember Doria Robinson, Councilmember Sue Wilson, Vice Mayor Cesar Zepeda, and Mayor Eduardo Martinez
Absent (2): Councilmember Soheila Bana, and Councilmember Claudia Jimenez Passed
Motion by Vice Mayor Cesar Zepeda
Seconded by Councilmember Jamelia Brown
A motion was made by Councilmember Zepeda, seconded by Councilmember Brown to adopt the urgency ordinance and direct that the vendor prioritize a feasibility analysis of re-routing sewer lines as a mitigation option.

Adopted Ordinance No. 10-25 N.S.

Ayes (5): Councilmember Jamelia Brown, Councilmember Doria Robinson, Councilmember Sue Wilson, Vice Mayor Cesar Zepeda, and Mayor Eduardo Martinez
Absent (2): Councilmember Soheila Bana, and Councilmember Claudia Jimenez Passed
X. NEW BUSINESS
X.1 AB 481 “Military Equipment Use” Annual Report
ADOPT a resolution (1) accepting the 2024 Annual Military Equipment Report; (2) determining that the Police Department’s use of military equipment in 2024 complied with the Department’s Military Equipment Policy No. 707 and state law; and (3) to renew the authorizing Ordinance No. 12-22 N.S. / Military Equipment Use Policy - Police Department (Bisa French 510-621-1802). THIS ITEM WAS CONTINUED FROM THE MARCH 25, 2025, MEETING AND WILL BE CONTINUED TO THE APRIL 22, 2025, MEETING.

X.2 Update on Street Sweeping Sign Installation & Data Collection RECEIVE a presentation on the status of the installation of street sweeping signs citywide; and ADOPT a resolution and APPROPRIATE $564,131.17 from the fund balance in the SB1 fund for citywide sign, streetlight, and traffic signal pole data collection – Public Works Department (Daniel Chavarria/Tawfic Halaby/Robert Chelemedos 510-231-3008).

Deputy Director of Public Works Tawfic Halaby, Deputy Director of Public Works Robert Armijo presented a PowerPoint.
1962
cc01Apr2025 – ud/prc

Page 11 of 12 ends

Link to presentation: Street Sweeping
The city council requested the following: that text alerts were sent to remind residents about street sweeping days; hire more staff, if needed, for future sign installation and maintenance; make lettering for the hours on the signs larger than the other words and that the signs were red rather than white for better visibility.

Cordell Hindler, Mark Harper, Mark Wassberg, David Wee, Jonas Juhlin, Clarita Griffin, Sandy Jackson, Lori Hart. Shawn Dunning, Emily Ross, and Arto Rentilla.

A motion was made to approve the recommended action, adopt the resolution, and directed staff to investigate the feasibility of starting a text alert program to remind residents of street sweeping days.

Adopted Resolution No. 32-25.

Motion by Councilmember Doria Robinson
Seconded by Councilmember Jamelia Brown
Ayes (5): Councilmember Jamelia Brown, Councilmember Doria Robinson, Councilmember Sue Wilson, Vice Mayor Cesar Zepeda, and Mayor Eduardo Martinez
Absent (2): Councilmember Soheila Bana, and Councilmember Claudia Jimenez Passed
X.3 Receive Direction from City Council on Healthy Options at Point of Sale (HOPS).

DISCUSS and PROVIDE DIRECTION to City staff on the draft Healthy Options at Point-of-Sale (HOPS) ordinance in collaboration with HOPS youth advocates - City Attorney’s Office/Economic Development Department (James Atencio 510- 620-6509/Samantha Carr 510-620-5407/Yahna Williamson 510-620-6574).

Environmental Manager, Samantha Carr and Management Analyst Yahna Willamson presented a PowerPoint.

Link to presentation: HOPS Presentation
Jamin Pursell, Cordell Hindler, Elvira Martin Bautista, and Monique Blodgett gave comments.

The city council requested the following: that the list of items containing banned food dyes was taken into account per The California School Food Safety Act signed into law by Governor Gavin Newsom; partner with Contra Costa County for enforcement efforts; and add HOPS enforcement to existing business inspections; clarify the definition of retailers; provide outreach and education to business owners; and hire more code enforcement staff.

X.4 Incorporate Tree Wells for Sidewalk Development to Increase Tree Canopies DIRECT staff to immediately include tree wells for all CIP projects that include sidewalks and have not yet completed their design, or where a non-cost prohibitive change order could be used to adjust the design to include tree wells where it is feasible. Feasibility should be based on our new sidewalk standards and policy once they are completed. DIRECT staff to create a clear definition of what feasibility is as it relates to ADA accessibility, legal, and safety constraints.

DIRECT staff to work with local non-profits, community groups, and residents, to 1963
cc01Apr2025 – ud/prc

Page 12 of 12 ends

plant trees in these new and old tree wells and create and implement a regular tree maintenance plan to take care of the trees once they are planted - Vice Mayor Cesar Zepeda (510-620-6593) and Councilmember Doria Robinson (510-620- 6568).

Vice Mayor Zepeda gave an overview.

Discussion ensued. The city council directed staff to look at the Urban Forestry Committee's guide to the city for reference.

Jamin Pursell gave comments.

Motion by Vice Mayor Cesar Zepeda
Seconded by Councilmember Doria Robinson
Ayes (5): Councilmember Jamelia Brown, Councilmember Doria Robinson, Councilmember Sue Wilson, Vice Mayor Cesar Zepeda, and Mayor Eduardo Martinez
Absent (2): Councilmember Soheila Bana, and Councilmember Claudia Jimenez Passed
Y. REPORTS OF OFFICERS: REFERRALS TO STAFF, AND GENERAL REPORTS (INCLUDING AB 1234 REPORTS)(limited to two minutes per Councilmember) Councilmember Robinson reported that she attended a task force meeting to discuss the future vision for the development of Macdonald Avenue.

Councilmember Brown reported that she presented a proclamation at the unveiling of a mural at the Richmond Police Activity League building in memory of "OJ" Officer Orlando Brown Councilmember Robinson stated that she also attended the Richmond Fire Department badge pinning ceremony.

Vice Mayor Zepeda reported the following: attended the farewell event for the youth visiting from Japan; conducted the 3rd annual District 3 meeting; attended the CAL Cities Policy Committee meeting in Burbank, CA.

Councilmember Wilson reported that she attended the Personnel Board meeting where a Code Enforcement position for enforcement of sidewalk vendors was not approved.

Mayor Martinez reported the following: attended the Richmond Fire Department badge pinning ceremony; went to the Farmers Market and mobile vendor location on Macdonald Avenue; and attended the last day of Dahli Lama's 90th Birthday celebration at the Richmond Auditorium.

Z. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 10:17 p.m., to meet again on April 15, 2025.

Clerk of the City of Richmond Mayor
1964
From: Lary Hanshaw
To: City Clerk Dept User
Subject: Public comments - Agenda Item - Keller Beach Sewer Moratorium Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 3:13:29 PM
This email originated from outside of the City's email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

This email originated from outside of the City's email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

I own a property in the Keller Beach Sanitary Sewer moratorium area. I recently built an ADU, which was just completed; I have received the final approval from the building department on the permit.

Right now the water/sewer for the ADU is connected to the water/sewer of the main building on the property. My plan is to submit plans to the city to connect the water/sewer system for the ADU directly to the city water/sewer.

Given that this proposed change wouldn’t add additional capacity to the city sewer system, would this submittal be exempt from the moratorium?
Thanks,
Lary Hanshaw
1965
From: Simon Winer
To: City Clerk Dept User
Cc: ICE Claire Arbour WIFE
Subject: public comments -Agenda Item # April 1, 2025 Keller Beach Sanitary Sewer Date: Thursday, March 27, 2025 4:52:16 PM
Attachments: image.png
image.png
This email originated from outside of the City's email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

This email originated from outside of the City's email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Dear City of Richmond,
Thanks for the opportunity to comment on this important topic.

I have a Point of Order: The link that was provided to access the map of the affected properties has an error.

The correct link is:
https://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/4219/Keller-Beach
My wife and I live on Western Dr. and are long term residents of this fine city. We reside in the affected sewer collection area.

The findings made at the time of the January 18, 2022 Ordinance (below) have not changed to date and the sewer problems have not been mitigated. As a result, it follows that the urgency ordinance should continue until such time as the City can assure that the current and immediate threat to public health, safety and welfare has been resolved.

San Francisco Baykeeper brought this matter of the failed sewer line to the attention of the City and they will pursue this matter until it is resolved.

We fully support the timely and responsible resolution of this matter prior to allowing additional connections to this failed sewer line.

Best,
Simon Winer and Claire Arbour
360 Western Dr.
1966
1967
From: Janet Daly
To: City Clerk Dept User
Subject: Streep Sweeping in the Richmond Annex
Date: Thursday, March 27, 2025 8:09:44 PM
This email originated from outside of the City's email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

This email originated from outside of the City's email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Dear City Council,
I have lived and owned a home in the Richmond Annex on Van Fleet Avenue for the last 31 years.

Ever since the city implemented street sweeping my side of the street has been on the 4th Thursday of each month.

Your new signs have now switched the sides of the street to be swept today (so I'm now Friday) - who's brilliant idea was this to do a switcheroo on everyone anyway?
HOWEVER, the street sweeper company doesn't seem to know this. They swept my side of the street and now that is supposed to be tomorrow too. Who's running the show here?
Your ineptness at this whole boondoggle is deplorable for spending money so carelessly.

And as usual, the street sweeper made more a mess than before they came down our street. I am always having to go out and pick up the debris they sweep in front of my property.

Shameful.

My husband went around the neighborhood to document. The photos attached are representative of the mess the street sweeper made on each of our streets. He took 46 of them. When will you have someone come and clean up the mess the street sweeper makes. Happy to send you more photos.

I keep my property clean and I take the weeds, leaves, etc. out of gutter.

I don't appreciate the sweeper bringing gravel, dirt, limbs, debris and broken glass (that I can cut my hands on and get flat tires) as well as other trash it just sweeps down the street. It needs to be picked up.

Period.

I was willing to put up with this to keep the signs away, but now I'm not since you now want to give us tickets. Shall I start charging you for my time to sweep up the mess
made by the sweeping truck? Please fix this problem of your sweeping mess.

And if these signs are not about the money (as I read in an article), then when you start ticketing, they should be a nominal amount. Otherwise, you are penalizing hard-working families and individuals who are struggling to just get by in this crazy time of our country.

And what exactly are you spraying on our street to get into our water 1968
supply?
Do you have information posted somewhere for this? It should be made available to the public.

Janet Daly
[email protected]
510.559.9350 phone
510.559.9722 fax
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
Portal  Search...  
Meeting Date Agenda Item Name Email Comment Position Status City Council
4/1/2025 3:30 PM Extension of
Moratorium on
New Tobacco
Retailers
Philip Rosenthal philiprosenthal@g
mail.com
Please extend the
moratorium
against smoke
shops in
Richmond. Please
help legitimate

EXISTING
businesses like
Arco , 7-11, and
local markets to
update their
permits and keep
in compliance. It is
worth noting that
there was never a
problem when the
enforcement of
tobacco and liquor
licenses was
handled by
dedicate members
of the police force.

This staff was fired
and never
replaced. The
actions of the
council and staff
have made it clear
that anyone can do
what they want in
Richmond, OR,
taxpayers bear the
burden of paying
to go back and
For Appro
4/2/25, 8:43 AM richmond.escribemeetings.com/Pages/ReportingPrintFriendly.aspx?reporting-reporttype=PublicComment https://richmond.escribemeetings.com/Pages/ReportingPrintFriendly.aspx?reporting-reporttype=PublicComment 1/5 1980
correct the errors ,
or lack of
enforcement, with
hundreds of
thousands of legal
and staff dollars to
fix what was
previously not
broken. Cigarettes
are legal, but their
sale (and
permitting and
taxation) needs to
be properly
regulated, and
sleazy businesses,
or those that are
fronts for illegal
activity, steps from
schools and other
gathering places
should not be
allowed.
4/1/2025 3:30 PM Extension of the
Keller Beach
Sanitary Sewer
Moratorium (2025-
2027) – Adoption
of Urgency
Ordinance
Don Mill donmillarchitect@g
mail.com
council members
Thank you for
addressing our
concerns from last
meeting
particularly with
Addendum No 3 to
your Scope of
Services. That now
includes Rerouting
studies to address
catastrophic failure
of the KBSS. We
still expect that
once the engineers
get into this
problem, the first
For Appro
4/2/25, 8:43 AM richmond.escribemeetings.com/Pages/ReportingPrintFriendly.aspx?reporting-reporttype=PublicComment https://richmond.escribemeetings.com/Pages/ReportingPrintFriendly.aspx?reporting-reporttype=PublicComment 2/5 1981
line
ofdefense will be Rerouting some of the sewer load away from the KBSS. Please note that this is supported emphaticallyby
HCD in itsapproval of the Moratorium just last week: “HCD urges the City to work diligently to implement interim and permanent solutions that will allow housing development to proceed in the moratorium area as soon as reasonably possible, consistent with the City’s obligation to protect public health and safety”. The Rerouting study must be done immediately. It is the only approach that reduces the load to the KBSS. It is an inexpensive mitigation now and will reduce the cost of the long term solution. Council Members…Please 4/2/25, 8:43AMrichmond.escribemeetings.com/Pages/ReportingPrintFriendly.aspx?reporting-reporttype=PublicComment https://richmond.escribemeetings.com/Pages/ReportingPrintFriendly.aspx?reporting-reporttype=PublicComment3/5 1982
add whatever
emphasis is
needed to not
allow another two
years to go by,
thereby continuing
an unnecessary
increased
exposure to this
imminent threat.

HCD approval was
Mar 26…which
according to your
current
Moratorium
Section 4 says: …In
accordance with
Government Code
Section 65858, this
Ordinance shall be
in full force and
effect for a period
of 45 days from the
date when the
Department of
Housing and
Community
Development
approves this
moratorium. There
is an error
regarding starting
the 45 days from
Feb 18. So…there is
time to refine this
ordinance and
reduce risk while
we wait for a
solution. Please
find a way to
assure that the
4/2/25, 8:43 AM richmond.escribemeetings.com/Pages/ReportingPrintFriendly.aspx?reporting-reporttype=PublicComment https://richmond.escribemeetings.com/Pages/ReportingPrintFriendly.aspx?reporting-reporttype=PublicComment 4/5 1983
Rerouting study is
done now and not
lost in the larger
solution. After all,
Public Works has
made it clear that
The sword of
Damocles is upon
us all.
4/2/25, 8:43 AM richmond.escribemeetings.com/Pages/ReportingPrintFriendly.aspx?reporting-reporttype=PublicComment https://richmond.escribemeetings.com/Pages/ReportingPrintFriendly.aspx?reporting-reporttype=PublicComment 5/5 1984
DRAFT

LICENSE/PERMIT HAS BEEN

OBTAINED AND IS UP TO DATE

NO FEES ARE DUE

LICENSE/PERMIT HAS NOT BEEN

OBTAINED OR PAID FOR
STATE

LICENSE/PERMIT

APPLICANT AND

BUSINESS LICENSE

APPLICANT
MATCH
STATE

LICENSE/PERMIT

APPLICANT AND

BUSINESS LICENSE

APPLICANT DO

NOT MATCH

COUNCIL

DISTRICT

STATE TOBACCO LICENSE
(2024)

CITY TOBACCO PERMIT
(2015-2024)

CLEAR OF
VIOLATIONS?

STOPPED

SELLING/

DISPLAYING
TOBACCO?
District
Number CA License City Business City Business City PD/CR

STATE TOBACCO

LICENSE

APPLICANT

CITY TOBACCO
PERMIT

APPLICANT

NO / YES NO / YES

LICENSE/OWNER
★ 1 23rd Cigarette 3

ROBINSON
2315 Cutting Blvd 94804 2004
PERMIT STARTED 2015
(5 YEARS MISSING) CDTFA ✖ ✖
2 23rd Convenience Store 3

ROBINSON
240-262 23rd St #260 94804 2024

NO CITY

TOBACCO
PERMIT
CDTFA ✖ ✖
2001-2002
4 7 Star Gift Shop and
Tobacco
6 JIMENEZ
4920-4934 McBryde Ave #4926 94805 2021
PERMIT STARTED 2021
(3 YEARS MISSING)

CDTFA /
TASKFORCE ✖ ✅
5 7-Eleven 2
ZEPEDA
925 Cutting Blvd 94804 2018

NO CITY

TOBACCO
PERMIT
N/A ✖ ✖
2001-2023
⊛ 7
24-7 Gas and Food (was
ARCO)
3 ROBINSON
5001 Cutting Blvd 94804 2011
PERMIT STARTED 2015
(1 YEAR MISSING)

CHANGE OF

OWNERSHIP/

FRANCHISE
N/A ✅ ✖
★
2023-2025
2002-2025 ✅ ✖
2018-2025
6 Amigo's/M & A Market 933 Maine Ave 94804
PERMIT STARTED 2015
(1 YEAR MISSING)

NO STATE

LICENSE

CHANGE OF

OWNERSHIP
(2001-2023 owner)
2021-2025
2024 ✅ ✖
CDTFA
N/A
City of Richmond, CA - Unlicensed Tobacco Retailer Analysis 2012-2025
3 4th Street Market 301 4th St 94801 2018
PERMIT STARTED 2015
(9 YEARS MISSING)
NO
Tobacco
Retailers
within
500ft?
NO
Youth
Areas
within
1000ft?
CURRENT BUSINESS OWNER MATCH?
BUFFER

COMPLIANCE
Count Name Address Suite Zip

LEGAL (PARCEL) ADDRESS

CITY BUSINESS LICENSE
(Years Paid/Active)
2 ZEPEDA
2002-2025
Community Development Department - Code Enforcement Division

MASTER LIST
VIOLATIONS MAY INCLUDE:

OUT OF STATE/UNTAXED TOBACCO

CANNABIS

OTHER ILLEGAL DRUGS

LICENSE/PERMIT HAS BEEN

OBTAINED BUT IS BEHIND ON

PAYMENTS/RENEWALS

CURRENT LICENSE/OWNER

INITIAL APPLICATION YEAR
(CDTFA)

INITIAL APPLICATION YEAR
(# YEARS UNPAID BEFORE 04-16-24)
2015-2021 W/ RPD
2022 ONWARD W/ CODE
STATUS
(previous business
owner City permit was
under)
STATUS
(previous business
owner State license
was under)
N/A
To Be Inspected
Inspections Conducted
on April 21st and
22nd, 2025
Council
Member
1 BROWN
1985 ver. DRAFT JUNE.18.2025
DRAFT
2001-2003
2002-2006
2005-2006
2000-2019
2010-2018
2012-2016
2015-2024
★ 12 Brother's Liquor and
Market
3 ROBINSON
3717 Wall Ave 94804 2004
PERMIT STARTED 2015
(3 YEARS MISSING) CDTFA ✅ ✖
13 Cazadores Market 1
BROWN
1076-1078 13th St #1078 94801
PERMIT STARTED 2015
(1 YEAR MISSING)

NO STATE

LICENSE
N/A ✅ ✖
2002-2015
2001-2022
2021
APP

WITHDRAWN
16 Clothing and More 3

ROBINSON
916 Macdonald Ave 94801

NO ACTIVE

BUSINESS

LICENSE

NO ACTIVE

BUSINESS

LICENSE
TASKFORCE ✖ ✖
⊛
⊛
★

CHANGE OF

OWNERSHIP
(2009-2019 owner)

CHANGE OF

OWNERSHIP
(2015-2024 owner)

CHANGE OF

OWNERSHIP
(2012-2016 owner)
2012-2025

FRANCHISER
2013-2025

FRANCHISEE
Chevron (Kacee's World
of Water) 2900 Hilltop Mall Road 94806 2021
94805 2015
PERMIT STARTED 2015
2016-2025 (8 YEARS MISSING) ✖ ✖
2011-2025
94804 2020
PERMIT STARTED 2015
(8 YEARS MISSING)
2002-2025
2025
N/A
N/A
2019-2024
2020
2019-2024
PERMIT STARTED 2015
(6 YEARS MISSING) ✅ ✖
2006-2025
N/A
10 Bayview Market 1025 S 47th St 94804 N/A
9 Barrett Avenue Market 1913 Barrett Ave 94801
PERMIT STARTED 2015
(6 YEARS MISSING) ✖ ✅
PERMIT STARTED 2015
(6 YEARS MISSING)

NO STATE

LICENSE
✖ ✅
N/A
1 BROWN
2 ZEPEDA
14 Chevron 4838 Macdonald Ave

CHANGE OF

OWNERSHIP
(2002-2015 owner)
15 ✖ ✖
8 ARCO (ampm) 12890 San Pablo Ave 94805 2009
11 Blue/Super Save/La
Costena Market
6 1170 23rd St ✅ ✖

JIMENEZ
N/A

NO ACTIVE

BUSINESS

LICENSE

NO ACTIVE

BUSINESS

LICENSE
PERMIT STARTED 2015
(1 YEAR MISSING)

NO ACTIVE

BUSINESS

LICENSE
5 WILSON
6 JIMENEZ
6 JIMENEZ
1986 ver. DRAFT JUNE.18.2025
DRAFT
2001-2005
2010-2021
18 Cutting Market 3

ROBINSON
2901 Cutting Blvd 94804 2022 2022

NO ACTIVE

BUSINESS

LICENSE

CHANGE OF

OWNERSHIP
(no assoc. license)

NO CITY

TOBACCO
PERMIT
N/A OUT OF BUSINESS ✅ ✖
19 Da Bay Smoke Shop 1
BROWN
2003-2005 Macdonald
Ave
#2005 94801 2010
PERMIT STARTED 2015
(2 YEARS MISSING) CDTFA ✖ ✖
2003-2013
2013-2014
21 Discount Market 1
BROWN
649 23rd St 94804 2024

NO CITY

TOBACCO
PERMIT
TASKFORCE OUT OF BUSINESS ✖ ✖
22 El Cerrito Smoke Shop 5
WILSON
10281 San Pablo Ave #287 94530 UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

APPLICANT
NAME

NO CITY

TOBACCO
PERMIT
CDTFA ✖ ✖
23 Exclusive Apparel 3

ROBINSON
2220 Cutting Blvd 94804 2023

NO CITY

TOBACCO
PERMIT
CDTFA ✖ ✖
24 Exotic Clouds 6

JIMENEZ
12557 San Pablo Ave 94805 2024

NO CITY

TOBACCO
PERMIT

CDTFA &

TASKFORCE

RED TAGGED MAY
3RD ✖ ✖
★ 25 Fiesta Latina #1 3

ROBINSON
1430 Cutting Blvd 94804 2013
PERMIT STARTED 2015
(6 YEARS MISSING) N/A ✖ ✖
2002-2006
2011-2012
27 Golden Gate/Regatta
/Eastgate Petroleum
5 WILSON
3407 Hoffman Blvd 94804 2017

NO CITY

TOBACCO
PERMIT
N/A ✅ ✖
⊛
★
CDTFA
N/A

TASKFORCE
20 CHANGE OF

OWNERSHIP
(no assoc. license)

CHANGE OF

OWNERSHIP
(2015-2025 owner)

CHANGE OF

OWNERSHIP
(2010-2021 owner)
PERMIT STARTED 2023 ✖
2014-2025
2022-2025
✖
2024
26 First/One Stop Market 564 Harbour Way 94801 2014
PERMIT STARTED 2015
(5 YEARS MISSING)
2023
2013-2025
2022-2024
2022-2024
2015-2025
254 Marina Way 94801 2024
Discount Cigarette and
Cell Phone
✖ ✖
17 Cutting Gas and Food 1001 Cutting Blvd 94804 2022 ✖
2006-2025
PERMIT STARTED 2015
(9 YEARS MISSING) ✖
2021-2025
3 ROBINSON
1 BROWN
3 ROBINSON
1987 ver. DRAFT JUNE.18.2025
DRAFT
28 Hi5 Gift and Tobacco 3

ROBINSON
1100-1350 Macdonald
Ave
#1190 94801 2023

NO CITY

TOBACCO
PERMIT
CDTFA ✖ ✖
2002-2013
2024
Planning
Review
31 La Raza Market #2 1
BROWN
2131 Macdonald Ave 94801 2005 NEVER PAID CDTFA ✖ ✖
2008-2018
2010-2021
33 LUCKY SMOKE SHOP 1
BROWN
633 23rd St 94804 2024

NO BUSINESS

LICENSE

NO BUSINESS

LICENSE
CDTFA ✖ ✖
34 M&M Market and
Wholesale
1 BROWN
845-849 23rd St #845 94804

NO STATE

LICENSE

NO CITY

TOBACCO
PERMIT
CODE

ENFORCEMENT
CODE

ENFORCEMENT

PROACTIVE
6/5/25
✖ ✖
★ 35 M&O Mart and Deli 1
BROWN
1551 Nevin Plz 94801 2013
PERMIT STARTED 2015
(3 YEARS MISSING) TASKFORCE ✖ ✖
1999-2000
2002-2003
2005-2007
2008-2012
2012-2014
2015-2018
2018-2019

CHANGE OF

OWNERSHIP
(2002-2013 owner)
2001-2025
MARKET
2022-2025

SMOKE SHOP
29 N/A Joe's Market / Joe's Gift
Shop 95 Macdonald Ave 94801
✖
CDTFA
2025

CHANGE OF

OWNERSHIP
(2008-2018 owner)
N/A
32 La Tiendona Market and
Produce/Ohio Market 1700 Ohio Ave 94804 2020
PERMIT STARTED 2015
(7 YEARS MISSING) ✅
✅
2023-2025
2013-2024
PERMIT STARTED 2015
(6 YEARS MISSING)

NEW OWNER/

BUSINESS

LICENSE UNDER
REVIEW; DOES

MATCH STATE

LICENSE
✖
✖
2020-2025

NEVER PAID

NO ACTIVE

BUSINESS

LICENSE

NO ACTIVE

BUSINESS

LICENSE
✅

NO ACTIVE

BUSINESS

LICENSE
30 Kwik Serv 1503 Carlson Blvd 94804 2023
2002-2025
N/A
2012-2025
36 Marathon/Central/
Richmond Gas 1825 Cutting Blvd 94804 2024
1 BROWN
✖
✖
2023
PERMIT STARTED 2015
(8 YEARS MISSING)
MARKET
OWNER
MATCHES;

SMOKE SHOP

UNKNOWN
MARKET
OWNER
MATCHES;

SMOKE SHOP

UNKNOWN
3 ROBINSON
3 ROBINSON
5 WILSON
1988 ver. DRAFT JUNE.18.2025
DRAFT
2011-2015
2018-2020
2021-2024
2012-2017
39 New India Supermarket 5
WILSON
10281 San Pablo Ave #289 94530 2018

NO CITY

TOBACCO
PERMIT
CDTFA ✖ ✖
2022
APP

INCOMPLETE
⊛ 41 Richmond Food Center 3

ROBINSON
2220 Cutting Blvd #2230 94804 2004
PERMIT STARTED 2015
(2 YEARS MISSING)
FAMILY

OWNERSHIP
TRANSFER?
FAMILY

OWNERSHIP
TRANSFER?
N/A ✖ ✖
42 Richmond Gift and
Smoke Shop
1 BROWN
2229-2235 Macdonald
Ave
#2235 94801 2023

NO CITY

TOBACCO
PERMIT
CDTFA ✖ ✖
2001-2022
2006-2007
2006-2017
2015-2021
2020-2021
2002-2003
2010
2014-2019
★ 46 S & S Market 2
ZEPEDA
112 S 7th St 94804 2014
PERMIT STARTED 2015
(4 YEARS MISSING) N/A ✅ ✖
⊛
✖ ✖
2008-2025
45 Rose and Mike's Liquor 12620 San Pablo Ave #622 94805 2014

NO ACTIVE

BUSINESS

LICENSE
PERMIT STARTED 2015
(6 YEARS MISSING)
MATCHES (2014-2019)

BUT BUSINESS LICENSE

EXPIRED
MATCHES (2014-2019)

BUT BUSINESS LICENSE

EXPIRED
✖
2023-2025 ✖ ✖
44 Richmond Smoke Shop 3047 Cutting Blvd #3049 94804 2021

NO ACTIVE

BUSINESS

LICENSE
43 Richmond Petroleum 1000 Cutting Blvd 94804 2023
PERMIT STARTED 2015
(1 YEAR MISSING)
PERMIT STARTED 2021
(5 YEARS MISSING)
2024

APP DENIED
38 Mira Vista Liquor 12469 San Pablo Ave #471 94805 2018 NEVER PAID ✅
CDTFA

BUSINESS OWNER

ON STATE

LICENSE HAD

BUSINESS LICENSE
(2024) DENIED
2023-2024
✖
2017-2025
✖

CHANGE OF

OWNERSHIP
(2001-2022 owner)
N/A

CDTFA &

TASKFORCE

CHANGE OF

OWNERSHIP
(no assoc. license)

CDTFA &

TASKFORCE

BUSINESS OWNER

ON PERMIT

RECORD HAD

BUSINESS LICENSE
(2024) DENIED

NO CITY

TOBACCO
PERMIT
37 Mi Pueblo Market 544-550 Harbour Way #550 94801 NEVER PAID

NO STATE

LICENSE
✖
2024-2025
1 BROWN

CHANGE OF

OWNERSHIP
(unknown owner)
N/A
✖
2022-2023
2002-2025

NO STATE
LICENSE 40 Pipes R Us 2 15501 San Pablo Ave A 94806
ZEPEDA
2013-2022 ✖
✖
6 JIMENEZ
6 JIMENEZ

TASKFORCE
3 ROBINSON
3 ROBINSON
1989 ver. DRAFT JUNE.18.2025
DRAFT
2000-2001
2002-2016
2008-2009
★ 51 Uncle Sam's Liquors 5
WILSON
3322-3330 Cutting Blvd #3322 94804 2006
PERMIT STARTED 2015
(3 YEARS MISSING) N/A ✅ ✖
2002-2016
⊛
⊛
⊛

CHANGE OF

OWNERSHIP
(2002-2016 owner)
N/A

CHANGE OF

OWNERSHIP
(2010-2024 owner)
CDTFA

CHANGE OF
OWNERSHIP?
✖ ✖
2017-2023
✅ ✖
2025
52 Valero/7-Eleven 12678 San Pablo Ave 94805 2018
94805 2016
2002-2025
✖
2023
48 Stop and Save Gasoline 2221-2229 Cutting Blvd #2229 94804 2016 PERMIT STARTED 2015
(7 YEARS MISSING) ✖
2016-2025
✖
47 N/A Sinclair Gas (was
Valero) 3701 Cutting Blvd 94804 2023
2002-2024
PERMIT STARTED 2015
(1 YEAR MISSING)

CHANGE OF

OWNERSHIP/
FRANCHISE?

CHANGE OF

OWNERSHIP/
FRANCHISE?
✅
✖
2023-2025
49 Stop and Shop Market 800 Carlson Blvd 94804 2023
PERMIT STARTED 2015
(5 YEARS MISSING)

MATCHES

BUSINESS

OWNER ON THE
2023-2025

BUSINESS

LICENSE
✅
2002-2025
2021-2022 CDTFA
2010-2024
PERMIT STARTED 2015
(9 YEARS MISSING)

UNKNOWN

OWNER ON

STATE RECORD,

USES STORE

NAME ONLY
2016-2025 PERMIT STARTED 2017
(6 YEARS MISSING)
6 JIMENEZ
6 JIMENEZ
50 Stop N Go 5500 McBryde Ave
N/A
3 ROBINSON
3 ROBINSON
5 WILSON
1990 ver. DRAFT JUNE.18.2025
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REVISING THE SCOPE OF THE CITY’S TOBACCO MORATORIUM AS IMPOSED BY URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 03-24 FOR THE PURPOSE

OF CREATING A PATHWAY TO COMPLIANCE PROGRAM FOR CERTAIN LEGACY

RICHMOND BASED TOBACCO RETAILERS
WHEREAS, on April 16, 2024, the City Council adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 03-24 N.S. establishing a 45-day moratorium on the approval of granting any permit, license, and land use entitlement for any new tobacco retailer within the City to allow the City time to study viable solutions and municipal code amendments necessary to reasonably regulate tobacco retailers in the City as more fully described in that ordinance; and WHEREAS, on May 21, 2024, after a showing and issuance of a report documenting the steps the City took to alleviate the conditions necessitating the adoption of Ordinance No. 03-24 N.S., the City Council adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 05-24 N.S. extending the moratorium established by Urgency Ordinance No. 03-24 N.S. for ten months and fifteen days from the date of the 45-day moratorium’s expiration of May 31, 2024, thereby extending the moratorium expiration date to April 15, 2025; and
WHEREAS, on April 1, 2025, the City Council adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 09-25 N.S. extending the moratorium established by Urgency Ordinance No. 03-24 N.S. and Urgency Ordinance No. 05-24 N.S. for an additional 12 months, or one year from the expiration date imposed by Ordinance No. 05-24 N.S., thereby extending the moratorium expiration date to April 15, 2026; and
WHEREAS, for reasons set forth in justification of Ordinance No. 03-24 N.S., Ordinance No. 05-24 N.S., and Ordinance No. 09-25 N.S., which recitals are incorporated herein by reference, each of which declared by the City Council to be necessary, as without each ordinance, the approval of additional licenses, permits, and land use entitlements for any new tobacco retailers or the like would result in a current, immediate, and direct threat to the health, safety, and welfare of the community, taken together, constitute the City Council’s statements of the reasons constituting the necessity and urgency of each ordinance; and WHEREAS, on April 1, 2025, during its review of Ordinance No. 09-25, City Council discussed the scope of the tobacco moratorium imposed by the above ordinances and directed staff to come back to Council with a list of affected tobacco retailers that at some time between 2018 and 2024 had a valid tobacco license and a valid City of Richmond business license from 2018 to present without a change in ownership, and further directed staff to propose an amendment to the scope of the moratorium for Council’s consideration that excludes tobacco retailers meeting those qualifications to the extent those retailers have not otherwise been found to be conducting any illicit activities at their place of business.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Richmond does hereby ordain as follows:

SECTION 1: That the above recitals and recitals contained in Ordinance No. 03-24 N.S., Ordinance No. 05-24 N.S., and Ordinance 09-25 N.S. are true and correct and are adopted as the City Council’s findings.

SECTION 2: Amended Scope of Tobacco Ordinance
1991
Section 2 of Ordinance No. 03-24 N.S., which was subsequently extended by Ordinance No. 05-24 N.S. and Ordinance 09-25 N.S, is hereby amended to read as follows:

Purpose and Authority
In the interest of protecting the health, safety, and welfare of the residents in the City of Richmond, it is the purpose and intent of this ordinance to place a temporary moratorium on the issuance of any new permit, license, or other entitlement for any tobacco retailer in the City of Richmond, except for those tobacco retailers that meet all of the following criteria: (i) at some time between 2018 and 2024 held a valid City tobacco retailer license, (ii) have maintained a valid City of Richmond business license assigned to the same owner from 2018 to present, (iii) have maintained all other licenses and permits required by state law related to tobacco retailing, and (iv) have not been found to have engaged in illicit activities, such as selling cannabis, untaxed tobacco, out-of-state tobacco, and/or other drugs. The City Council has authority to adopt this ordinance pursuant to California Constitution Article XI, Section 7 and Government Code section 65858 as an urgency measure prohibiting any use that may be in conflict with a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal that the City is considering or studying.

Section 6 of Ordinance No. 03-24 N.S., which was subsequently extended by Ordinance No. 05-24 N.S. and Ordinance 09-25 N.S, is hereby amended to read as follows:

Moratorium on New Permits, Licenses, and Land Use Entitlements.

A. During the term of this ordinance, any new tobacco retailer, except for those tobacco retailers who meet all criteria enumerated in (i)-(iv) provided within Section 2 of this Ordinance, shall be prohibited in all zoning districts and lands within the City of Richmond. Tobacco retailers meeting all criteria enumerated in (i)-(iv) within Section 2 of this ordinance shall, for the duration of this ordinance, be deemed to have met the condition elaborated within section 7.106.060(1) of the Richmond Municipal Code. No application for any permit, license, or land use entitlement shall be granted or approved for any new tobacco retailer in any zoning districts or lands within the City of Richmond unless an exception applies.

Nothing herein shall limit the authority of the City to revoke or suspend any existing license, permit, and/or entitlement as authorized under existing law.

SECTION 3: Findings.

All other provisions of Ordinance No. 03-24 N.S. shall remain in full force and effect during the extended term of the City’s moratorium. In no event shall any entitlements or exceptions provided by this Ordinance extend beyond the City’s moratorium on tobacco retailers under 1992
Ordinance No. 03-24 N.S, as extended through April 15, 2026, or unless rescinded upon an earlier date.

SECTION 4: Environmental Review/California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

This ordinance will not cause a direct physical change in the environment, nor a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. The enactment of this ordinance, therefore, does not constitute the approval of a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), and it is exempt from CEQA. (Pub. Res. Code § 21065, CEQA Guidelines §§ 15060(c)(2)(3); 15061(b)(3); 15064(d)(3); 15378(a).

SECTION 5: Severability.

SECTION 6: Effective Date.

This ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its final passage and adoption. ------------------------------------------------------
First introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Richmond on June 24, 2025, and finally passed and adopted at a regular meeting held on __________________:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTENTION:
______________________________
Clerk of the City of Richmond
(SEAL)
Approved:
_________________________
Mayor
Approved as to form:
_________________________
City Attorney
1993

Page 1 of 3 ends

Date
City Council
DATE: June 24, 2025
TO: Mayor Eduardo Martinez and Members of the City Council FROM: Councilmember Jamelia Brown
Subject:

Develop and Launch a 6-month Pilot Program workingtitled, “Clean Richmond” Community Maintenance Crews FINANCIAL IMPACT:

General Fund or available funding source identified by
staff

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

None known at this time.

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

Across Richmond, particularly in historically underserved neighborhoods, residents have consistently voiced urgent concerns about the persistent accumulation of litter, illegal dumping, graffiti, and unsafe conditions throughout our communities and in neglected public spaces. While the
City’s Public Works team remains dedicated and
responsive, the growing volume of day-to-day
maintenance demands has stretched available resources
thin, limiting the City's ability to address smaller, yet highly visible, issues in a timely and consistent manner.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: DIRECT staff to identify a funding source and issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) to identify a nonprofit partner to launch a 6-month pilot program working-titled “Clean Richmond” Community Maintenance Crew. The program
will prioritize Transitional Age Youth (TAY) and sunset six months after the start date. During the pilot period, staff will hire four full-time equivalent (FTE) positions in Public Works - Councilmember Jamelia Brown (510-
AGENDA
REPORT
1994

Page 2 of 3 ends

Date
412-2050). This item was continued from the June 17,
2025, meeting.

DISCUSSION:

Richmond’s neighborhoods are at a critical juncture. There is an urgent and growing need to address the daily accumulation of trash, illegal dumping, graffiti, and visible blight across communities, particularly in historically underserved areas. Although the City’s Public Works Department remains committed and hardworking, the rising volume of day-to-day maintenance needs has stretched available resources thin, making it challenging to address the increased visible issue with the frequency our communities deserve.

Environmental psychology teaches us a powerful truth: what we consistently maintain, we consistently value. This shows that consistent maintenance of public spaces not only improves aesthetics but also trains public behavior. Studies suggest that when residents regularly see clean, well-maintained streets and parks, they are less likely to engage in littering, dumping, or vandalism. This “broken windows” principle—originally coined by social scientists James Q. Wilson and George L.

Kelling—demonstrates that clean, cared-for spaces reinforce positive community norms and expectations, while neglected spaces invite further neglect.

The Clean Richmond pilot program meets this moment. By hiring, training, and deploying Richmond residents to steward their own neighborhoods, we can immediately improve our city’s most neglected areas while transforming long-term community behavior. Clean Richmond is more than a beautification effort; it is a declaration that every neighborhood matters, every resident matters, and every block deserves to be seen, cared for, and protected with the intended purpose of:
 Improving safety, cleanliness, and walkability of our neighborhoods, key corridors, parks, and alleys
 Boost community morale and neighborhood pride
 Provide meaningful employment opportunities, especially for residents traditionally marginalized from the workforce
1995

Page 3 of 3 ends

Date
 Relieve Public Works from smaller daily maintenance tasks, enabling them to prioritize major infrastructure projects
This model builds on the proven success of initiatives like Urban Alchemy in San Francisco and Los Angeles, the Urban Compassion Project in West Hollywood, and Richmond’s own Pogo Park Maintenance Team— showing that consistent, community-driven stewardship can transform public spaces, reduce blight, rebuild trust in government services, and restore neighborhood pride. By embedding visible, local maintenance crews, these initiatives have demonstrated lasting improvements in public safety, perception, and community engagement.

In addition to adult staffing, through our nonprofit management partner, Clean Richmond could offer high school students and youth on probation the ability to volunteer on weekends to:
 Fulfill required community service hours
 Develop a sense of civic pride and responsibility
 Build positive connections with peers, mentors, and city leadership This youth engagement component also supports the City’s maintenance efforts and empowers Richmond’s next generation by providing young people with meaningful opportunities to contribute to their community, develop leadership skills, and strengthen the City's investment in both its physical spaces and social fabric.

Through the Clean Richmond initiative, the City has the opportunity to immediately uplift our neighborhoods, restore visible pride in underserved areas, reduce blight across key corridors, and build a long-term behavioral shift where residents and visitors alike respect and care for Richmond’s public spaces—every day, on every block.

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1: Proposed Clean Richmond Pilot Budget and Compensation Plan (If needed).

Attachment 2: Proposed Timeline for Clean Richmond Pilot Launch (If needed). 1996
Attachment 1: Proposed Clean Richmond Pilot Budget and Compensation Plan
Duration: 6-month Pilot Program
Work Schedule: 20 hours/week
Crew Members: 10
Team Leads: 2
Personnel Compensation
Role Hourly Rate Weekly
Hours
# of
Workers
Duration
(Weeks)
Total Cost
Crew
Members
$23 20 10 26 $119,600
Team Leads $25 20 2 26 $26,000
Subtotal $145,600
Supplies and Materials
Category Estimated Cost
Safety Gear (vests, gloves, boots) $3,000
Cleaning Tools (brooms, pickers) $4,000
Graffiti Removal & Paint Supplies $3,000
Trash Bags, PPE, Misc. Consumables $2,000
Uniforms & Branded Apparel $2,000
Subtotal $14,000
Program Management & Training
Category Estimated Cost
Nonprofit Program Coordination/Admin $20,000
Initial & Ongoing Training Workshops $5,000
Background Checks, Insurance, Payroll $6,000
Subtotal $31,000
Total Estimated Budget
**TOTAL ESTIMATED BUDGET: $190,600**
1997
Attachment 2: Proposed Timeline for Clean Richmond Pilot Launch This timeline outlines the phases and milestones for launching and implementing the Clean Richmond 6-month pilot program.

Phase Activity Estimated Dates
Phase 1: Planning &
Approval
Council approval of pilot
and directive to issue RFP
June 17, 2025
RFP released to identify
nonprofit partner
June 24, 2025
RFP review and selection by
City staff
July 15, 2025
Nonprofit partner
agreement finalized
July 22, 2025
Phase 2: Program Setup Job descriptions created
and posted
July 29, 2025
Recruitment, interviews,
and onboarding
Aug 1–23, 2025
Staff and youth orientation
and training
Aug 26–30, 2025
Final preparation of
supplies, uniforms, tools
Aug 26–30, 2025
Phase 3: Pilot
Implementation
Clean Richmond crews
deployed citywide
Sept 2, 2025
Ongoing community cleanup and maintenanceSept 2, 2025 – Feb 28, 2026 Phase 4: Evaluation &
Reporting
1st Quarterly Report to
Council
October 15, 2025
2nd Quarterly Report to
Council (midpoint)
December 10, 2025
3rd & Final Report with
Evaluation
March 10, 2026
1998

Page 1 of 2 ends

June 24, 2025
City Council
DATE: June 24, 2025
TO: Mayor Martinez and Members of the City Council
FROM: Councilmember Jamelia Brown
Councilmember Sue Wilson (co-sponsor)
Subject: Presentation from Futuro Health -Healthcare Career Training
FINANCIAL IMPACT: Authorize up to $22,700 from the General Fund, identified grants, or other available funds. Staff will coordinate with Futuro Health to verify eligibility and disburse payments accordingly.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

None.

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

Futuro Health, launched by SEIU-UHW and Kaiser
Permanente, provides tuition-free healthcare career
training. While program tuition is free, accepted
applicants are responsible for a $77 background check
and drug screening fee, and a $150 non-refundable
application fee ($227 total), which can be cost-prohibitive for low-income residents.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: RECEIVE a presentation from Futuro Health and ADOPT a resolution authorizing the allocation of up to $22,700 from an identified funding source to eliminate financial barriers for up to 100 Richmond residents accepted into Futuro Health career training programs by covering
mandatory application, background check, and drug
screening fees - Councilmember Jamelia Brown (510-
412-2050)/Councilmember Sue Wilson (510-609-2111).

AGENDA
REPORT
1999

Page 2 of 2 ends

June 24, 2025
DISCUSSION:

Futuro Health is a nonprofit organization established through a partnership between SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West (SEIU-UHW) and Kaiser Permanente. Futuro Health aims to build the largest network of credentialed allied health workers in the nation by providing tuition-free education and training programs for individuals aspiring to enter healthcare professions.

Futuro Health provides a range of tuition-free programs in high-demand allied health careers, including:
 Medical Assistant
 Pharmacy Technician
 Phlebotomy
 Emergency Room Technician
 Certified Nursing Assistant
 Community Health Worker
 Patient Care Technician
 Surgical Technologist
 Vocational Nursing
 Peer Support Specialist
 Healthcare Customer Service Paraprofessional
This proposal seeks to eliminate financial barriers for up to 100 Richmond residents by covering the $227 fee upon program acceptance. Supporting these costs aligns with the City’s workforce development goals and promotes access to high-demand healthcare careers.

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1 – Futuro Health Program Presentation
Attachment 2 – Resolution
2000
Healthcare Opportunities

F U T U RO
R A S H A A D A . P R I T C H E T T

S E I U - U H W
2001
1 4
2 5
3 7
6 SEIU-UHW and Futuro Health offer tuition-free
career pathways to build the future of healthcare
Partnership
Intro
8 9
2002
2 4
1 5
3 7
6 8
9 Why It Matters
Together, we’re growing our
healthcare workforce — helping future
professionals build careers without
debt!
2003
3 4
1 5
2 7
6 Minimum Eligibility
• Referred by an SEIU-UHW member
• 18+, CA resident, eligible to work
• GED or high school diploma
• Can study 3–5 hrs/day
• Reliable tech, internet, transportation
8 9
2004
4 3
1 5
2 7
6 8
9 Career
Pathways Medical Assistant
(MA) 8-12 months | Clinical lab +
full-time externship
MAs support doctors & nurses
in both admin and clinical care.

Patient Care Technician
(PCT) 5-6 months | Includes acute
CNA certification
Support nursing staff: vital
signs, patient mobility, more.

Emergency Room
Technician 5-8 months | Clinical
externship required
Trained EMTs working in ER
settings. Not offered in
Sacramento.
2005
5 3
1 4
2 7
6 8
9 Career
Pathways Patient Care Representatives
100% Online | 4-6 months (PCR)
Manage records, stats, and
assist patients with quality
care resources.

Healthcare Customer
Service Paraprofessional
100% Online | 5-6 months
Handle scheduling, insurance,
and patient registration.

Peer Support
Specialist
100% Online | 4 months
Help others recover using your
own lived experience.

EKG/ECG Technician
4 months | Hybrid
Run and manage heart rhythm
tests under physician
supervision. 2006
6 3
1 4
2 7
5 Readiness Checklist
• Ready to start in 2 weeks
• In contact with success coach
• Committed to one program
• Willing to do full-time externship
• Have a working laptop
• Understand vaccination/job placement policy
8 9
2007
731426589
2008
8 3
1 4
2 6
5 7
9 In times of uncertainty there are
few things that are... one of
those things is free education
through Futuro!
Pathways are filled on first
come first serve basis.

Call to Action
2009
931426578
Contact Details
Phone :

[email protected]
415-306-1394
Email :

Thank
you
Name : Rashaad Pritchett
2010
Reso. No. _____

Page 1 of 2 ends

RESOLUTION NO. ______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND AUTHORIZING THE ALLOCATION OF UP TO $22,700 FROM THE GENERAL

FUND TO SUPPORT RICHMOND RESIDENTS ACCEPTED INTO FUTURO

HEALTH CAREER TRAINING PROGRAMS
WHEREAS, Futuro Health is a nonprofit organization established by SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West (SEIU-UHW) in partnership with Kaiser Permanente to expand access to credentialed allied health careers through tuition-free education and training; and WHEREAS, Futuro Health offers career pathways in high-demand healthcare fields, including Medical Assistant, Pharmacy Technician, Phlebotomy, Certified Nursing Assistant, Community Health Worker, Peer Support Specialist, and more; and
WHEREAS, although tuition is covered by the program, accepted applicants are required to pay a $150 non-refundable application fee and a $77 fee for a mandatory background check and drug screening, for a total of $227, which may serve as a barrier for low-income residents; and WHEREAS, the City Council of Richmond recognizes the importance of investing in equitable workforce development and expanding access to sustainable career opportunities for youth, reentry residents, and historically underserved communities; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to remove financial barriers for up to 100 Richmond residents accepted into Futuro Health programs by covering the required $227 fee upon acceptance; and
WHEREAS, this action is consistent with the City’s goals to support economic mobility, workforce readiness, and community health outcomes.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richmond, California, that the City hereby authorizes the allocation of up to $22,700 from the General Fund, identified grants, or other available funding sources to cover the required fees for up to 100 Richmond residents accepted into Futuro Health career training programs.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that City staff are directed to work in coordination with Futuro Health to verify eligibility and acceptance, and to administer the disbursement of funds accordingly.
******************
***THE CLERK’S OFFICE WILL COMPLETE THE INFORMATION BELOW**** I certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Richmond at a regular meeting thereof held on Mmmm dd, yyyy, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTENTIONS:

ABSENT:

CLERK OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
(SEAL)
2011
Reso. No. _____

Page 2 of 2 ends

Approved:

Mayor
Approved as to form:

City Attorney
State of California }
County of Contra Costa : ss.

City of Richmond }
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Resolution No. _____, finally passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Richmond at a regular meeting held on Mmmm dd, yyyy.
_______________________________________
Pamela Christian, Clerk of the City of Richmond
2012

Page 1 of 2 ends

June 17, 2025
City Council
DATE: June 17, 2025
TO: Mayor Martinez and Members of the City Council
FROM: Vice Mayor Cesar Zepeda
Councilmember Doria Robinson (co-sponsor)
Mayor Eduardo Martinez (co-sponsor)
Subject: Select and Adopt an Official Tree of the City of Richmond FINANCIAL IMPACT: The proposed expenditure will require an appropriation of up to $5,000 towards any cost associated with the
creation of the City of Richmond Official Tree Survey,
survey outreach, and promotion.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

None.

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

The City of Richmond does not currently have an official City of Richmond tree. The formation of an ad hoc
committee is needed to provide oversight for the official tree selection in collaboration with the Urban Forest
Advisory Committee and City residents.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: DISCUSS with City Council and PROVIDE DIRECTION to work with the sponsors of this item and the Urban
Forest Advisory Committee to create a list of native trees, draft and publish an online survey, conduct survey
outreach to collect votes from Richmond residents, report back on its findings to City Council by the first meeting in October and no later than Arbor Day, the third
Wednesday of October, to announce the winner, and
APPROPRIATE up to $5,000 towards any cost
associated with the creation of the City of Richmond
Official Tree Survey and survey outreach and promotion, purchasing and planting new tree at Civic Center on
Arbor Day - Vice Mayor Cesar Zepeda (510-620-
AGENDA
REPORT
2013

Page 2 of 2 ends

June 17, 2025
6593)/Councilmember Doria Robinson (510-620-6568)
Mayor Eduardo Martinez (510-620-6503).

DISCUSSION:

The City of Richmond does not have an official tree. The City should adopt an official tree to help celebrate and define our City. To accomplish this, a community survey would be published and available to all Richmond residents to vote on.

The sponsors of this item and the Urban Forest Advisory Committee will work to create a list of native trees, create and publish an online survey, conduct survey outreach to collect votes from Richmond residents, present the outcome(s) of the outreach by no later than Arbor Day, the third Wednesday of October, and report back on its findings to City Council. The tree should be a native tree that will thrive in the City. Upon the selection of the tree, a space at Civic Center Plaza should be made to celebrate the newly selected new tree.

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

NONE.
2014

Page 1 of 3 ends

June 17, 2025
City Council
DATE: June 17, 2025
TO: Mayor Martinez and Members of the City Council
FROM: Councilmember Soheila Bana
Councilmember Doria Robinson (co-sponsor)
Subject: Visibility, Preservation and Protection of City-Owned Historic Buildings and Historically Significant Locations FINANCIAL IMPACT: Anticipated costs include staff time to coordinate the inventory, fabricate and install signage, and implement basic protective measures. These expenses may be
minimal, phased in and potentially offset by external
grants and partnerships.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

None.

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

Richmond is home to many sites and structures of
architectural, cultural, and historical significance that reflect the city’s diverse and vibrant past. However, two recent fires have highlighted the vulnerability of these assets:
 On April 25, 2023, the privately owned International
Hotel which was one of Richmond’s most historic
buildings tied to the legacy of the Pullman porters,
was completely destroyed by fire, resulting in the loss of an irreplaceable cultural asset.
 On May 23, 2025, the Sakai house one of 3 historic
Mira Flores structures, which is also privately owned
and is located on a site historically linked to
Richmond’s Japanese American and agricultural
history and preservation efforts, sustained
significant fire damage.

AGENDA
REPORT
2015

Page 2 of 3 ends

June 17, 2025
These events have drawn public concern and
emphasized the need for Richmond to take a proactive
approach to preserving its historical resources.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: DIRECT City staff to work with the Historic Preservation Commission and community groups to:
 Formalize and publicly share a verified list of cityowned historic buildings and historically significant locations.
 Create a process to accept nominations, review
and if warranted, install commemorative signage
on City-owned historic structures and important
locations of cultural memory (e.g., the former site
of the International Hotel). Additionally, the City
should offer to coordinate and assist with the
installation of plaques or historical markers for
privately owned historic buildings and sites,
provided the property owners are willing. This will
help commemorate important places regardless of
ownership and ensure the community's history
remains visible and celebrated.
 Develop and implement basic preservation
measures to protect city-owned historic buildings
from vandalism and fire damage.
 Explore grant and partnership opportunities to
support preservation efforts, with support from the
Historic Preservation Commission and local
history organizations.
 Create a staff led and City Council approved
process to evaluate whether any of the identified
historic buildings require additional site-specific
protection measures that would involve new
budget allocations. Rather than mandating uniform
maintenance rules, evaluate each structure’s
preservation needs individually, based on
historical significance, community interest, and
available resources.
 Provide a status update to the City Council within
180 days on progress made, challenges
encountered, and next steps for implementation -
Councilmember Soheila Bana (510-672-
3490)/Councilmember Doria Robinson (510-672-1387).
2016

Page 3 of 3 ends

June 17, 2025
DISCUSSION:

To ensure Richmond honors and preserves its history in a meaningful and actionable way, the following steps are proposed:
 Inventory & Visibility: Work with the Historic Preservation Commission and other community groups to verify and maintain a public inventory of historic buildings and historically significant sites both those that are city owned and privately owned. Ensure the inventory clearly indicates current ownership.  Commemorative Signage: Create a process to accept nominations, review and if warranted, install commemorative signage on city-owned historic structures and important locations of cultural memory (e.g., the former site of the International Hotel). Additionally, the City should offer to coordinate and assist with the installation of plaques or historical markers for privately owned historic buildings and sites, provided the property owners are willing. This will help commemorate important places regardless of ownership and ensure the community's history remains visible and celebrated.
 Protection Measures: Implement basic, cost-effective measures to protect highpriority sites, such as lighting, fire-resistant landscaping, fencing, and, where feasible, surveillance equipment.
 Case-by-Case Approach: Rather than mandating uniform maintenance rules, evaluate each structure’s preservation needs individually, based on historical significance, community interest, and available resources.  Funding & Collaboration: Seek preservation grants and engage community partners such as the Richmond Museum of History to support ongoing efforts and minimize fiscal impact.

This approach balances action with practicality, ensuring that Richmond’s historical legacy is honored without placing unsustainable financial burdens on the City.

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

None
2017

Richmond City CouncilJune 24, 2025

Richmond City Council
June 24, 2025