Roseville City Council
December 7, 2022

Chris White, Sr. Manager
Chris has been with Frontier Energy since 2004 and works with advanced transportation. Under her supervision, Frontier Energy staff support clients by conducting extensive market research, developing print and digital marketing materials, conducting community and stakeholder outreach, and workforce development and training. Chris’s clients include air districts, state and local government, associations, automakers, and utilities.

Similar projects:
• SMUD Multifamily Program (includes EVSE)
• City of Davis Public Charging Plan
• Madera County Public Infrastructure Plan
• Marin Clean Energy EV Consulting
• Private construction firm EV fleet transition planning Project Roles & Responsibilities
• Project lead
• Recommendations for
heavy-duty vehicles
• Funding strategies
• Regulatory compliance
• Best practices
Location
• West Sacramento, CA
Thomas Paddon, PMP, Sr. Program Consultant
Thomas joined Frontier Energy in 2021 to manage fleet transition planning and vehicle electrification projects. He joined the company from CALSTART where he developed vehicle electrification strategies and roadmaps, and fleet transition plans with a focus on support for ZEV programs for disadvantaged communities. He has developed various economic and TCO models for different fleet and market segments, and currently develops digital dashboards and interactive planning tools using PowerBI for each client.

Similar projects:
• East Bay Community Energy EV Fleet Transition (14 municipal fleets)
• City of Spokane Green Fleet Transition
• City of Duluth (MN) EV Fleet Transition
• Beaufort County (SC) EV Fleet Transition
Project Roles & Responsibilities
• Project management
• Client communication
• Vehicle analysis
• Recommendations for
light- and medium-duty
vehicles
• Digital dashboards
Location
• Monrovia, CA
Lead Staff

Mike Usen, AICP, Electromobility Practice Lead
Mike has dedicated his environmental planning career to the pursuit of environmental sustainability for nearly 30 years. He joined DKS in 2017 and leads the company-wide electric vehicle charging infrastructure planning and design practice. Mike oversaw development of DKS’s EVSE cost calculator and has completed dozens of electromobility projects. He is well-known in the electromobility industry among other consultants, electric vehicle OEMs, charging networks and manufacturers, EV tech startups, shared mobility providers, electric utilities, etc. and is a frequent presenter at the many electromobility conferences he attends.

Similar projects:
• City of Spokane Green Fleet Transition
• East Bay Community Energy EV Fleet Transition
• City of Seattle EVSE Systemwide Assessment
• City of Fremont Fleet Electrification Study
• City of Bellevue Green Fleet Strategy
Project Roles & Responsibilities
• DKS lead
• Site feasibility
• Charging demand analysis
• Cost analysis
• Mobility hub planning
• Software
recommendations
Location
• Seattle, WA
Yilun Xu, Electromobility Consultant
Yilun has eight years experience with a variety of electromobility projects on which he applies both his engineering and his business analysis expertise. His specialization includes charging demand management, electrical utility rate analysis, credit planning, bi-directional charging planning and operational cost analysis.

Similar projects:
• City of Bellevue Green Fleet Strategy
• University of California Davis Campus Electric Vehicle Study • City of Davis Public Charging Plan
• City of Tacoma Fleet Electrification
Project Roles & Responsibilities
• Cost analysis
• Funding
• Utilization planning
• Business models
Location
• Seattle, WA
Gurbir Antaal, Electromobility Engineer
Gurbir is an electrical and transportation engineer who brings six years of experience and a wide variety of skills relating to planning and designing electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure installation as well as power, traffic signal system and construction of lighting for highways and municipal/county roads. His experience also includes the design of other electric transportation infrastructure including illumination systems and traffic signals.

Similar projects:
• City of Elk Grove EV Fleet Transition Plan
• City of Fremont Fleet Electrification Study
• East Bay Community Energy EV Fleet Transition
• City of Spokane Green Fleet Transition
Project Roles & Responsibilities
• Cost analysis
• Site feasibility
• Site design
Location
• Sacramento, CA

TAB D: Project
Understanding
“It comes down to trust. My team trusts the Frontier
people they work with, and I think the feeling is mutual.” Client quote from Frontier Energy
2020 “Voice of the Customer” Survey

Most of our fleet electrification clients want answers to two questions: “what electrical upgrades do we need to make to support EV charging?” and “how much is it going to cost?” A third question is emerging, “how are we going to comply with the Advanced Clean Fleet regulation?” During our work with fleets, both creating transition plans and leading workshops in coordinations with Clean Cities Coalitions, we’ve learned that:
• Telematics software on vehicle is the exception, not the rule. We know how to find the information we need and, when necessary, use placeholder data from similar vehicles at similar cities. • Fleet vehicle replacement policies and processes vary by department and vehicle type. And that procurement practices evolve over time to represent department and City the needs and priorities.

We work with you to understand how your group specs and buys vehicles. • Older facilities may have had other systems upgrades that put them at maximum capacity. We look at the building holistically to understand the impact of past upgrades and the opportunities for building and vehicle electrification.
• The first duty of City employees is to effectively serve the residents and businesses. EVs and charging stations need to help them do their jobs the same or better, not reduce services or operating efficiency.
• An EV isn’t the perfect fit for every duty cycle and every vehicle. We explore all the options for replacing a fossil fuel vehicle with zero-carbon fuels. • Every plan is as unique as the department, the city, and staff. The attitudes and behavior of city employees, council members, commissioners, and residents shape our recommendations as much as data does.

Frontier Energy and DKS Associates have developed several tools to identify replacement vehicles, estimate charging energy needed, and identify the numbers and types of charging stations for fleet vehicles and public charging. Each of those tools is identified in the Project Plan.

Frontier maintains a database of electric and fuel cell vehicles that are currently available and those coming soon, the cost of the zero emission vehicles (ZEVs) and available incentives, and information about duty cycle and suitability to task. Our database also includes the vehicles that are targeted in the draft Advanced Clean Fleet regulation and those that are eligible for DERA grants. Because we’ve worked with dozens of municipal fleets, we are familiar with the challenging duty cycles of public works, public safety, and emergency preparedness and response vehicles, and of hot-seated police vehicles and take-home EVs.

DKS maintains close relationships with charging station manufacturers and software vendors and knows that each has a set of tools and capabilities for specific situations. We will recommend one or more systems that fit the use need at each site, and facilitate introductions and demonstrations as requested.

Project Understanding Project Understanding

To visualize the transition plan, Frontier creates
an interactive dashboard based on PowerBI. With
this dashboard, all stakeholders can visualize the
needs and gaps to procure and install electric
vehicles, charging stations, and resiliency with
estimated capital costs, total cost of ownership,
and greenhouse gas reduction. The dashboard’s
website is password protected and will remain
available throughout the project, and longer if
the City finds it useful. The City will also receive
spreadsheets and brief written reports with the
cleaned data and recommendations.

The Advanced Clean Fleet (ACF) regulation will need special consideration during the project. As currently written, it will require that 50% of Class 2b and above vehicles added to the City’s fleet be zero-emission vehicles (ZEVs) starting on January 1, 2024. We’ll need to make sure Roseville can comply with the regulation or has the justification for an exemption.

EVs and EV charging stations are rapidly evolving. The deployment strategy and plan that the Frontier/DKS team creates will carefully balance technology, human behavior, the City’s mission and GHG goals, and fiscal prudence. Your transition plan will be specific for the first few years, and less prescriptive in future years.

We also provide concepts, ideas, and tools to address equity, reduce capital and operating costs, training the workforce, and participate in grants and pilot programs so that Roseville can continue to demonstrate leadership in EV deployment.

Our approach to the scope of work is based on best practices and lessons learned from similar fleet transition plans. The Frontier/DKS team has a streamlined process make the best use of time and to minimize the requirements and resources from City staff.

OUR PROCESS

1. Collect data about current and planned vehicles, current and planned domicile facilities, and other City policies and priorities. Clean and validate the data. If data is missing, we fill gaps by meeting with the client’s team or using assumption data developed from other projects.

2. Identify vehicles/vehicle classes that can be electrified within 10 years and deliver a year-by-year vehicle transition plan that aligns with the client’s sustainability and decarbonization goals and with the pending Advanced Clean Fleet regulation.

3. Assess each facility for its ability to support charging stations, or identify alternatives.

4. Identify the infrastructure needed to support the vehicles, including how charging will impact facility energy use and strategies to mitigate higher capital and energy costs. We deliver a plan for charging stations, distributed energy resources, charge management systems, and other recommended equipment or software.

5. Identify policies, procedures, and training needed to support the EV transition.

6. Develop an interactive digital dashboard year-by-year transition planning.

7. Prepare a phased implementation plan with documents, calculations, maps, and language that the client can use for bid packages, and in grant and incentive applications.

Tab E: Project Plan
“They’re always looking for what’s new on the horizon,
for what might be happening in five or 10 years. This is really what we need.”
Client quote from Frontier Energy
2020 “Voice of the Customer” Survey

Kick-off Meeting
To ensure the project runs as smoothly as possible and meet requirements for reporting, data transparency, and accountability, Frontier Energy will schedule and facilitate a project kick-off with City staff and key team members from our project partner, DKS Associates.

We coordinate an initial meeting with all internal stakeholders, which often includes the fleet manager, facility manager, executive office, and sustainability director and sometimes includes public works, procurement, and/or council or board representative. Prior to the meeting we send an introductory email with a meeting agenda and a list of the data we want to obtain about fleet vehicles and facilities so that everyone is prepared with answers and questions.

The kick-off meeting has three “sections:”

1. Goals and outcomes: We will ensure that the City and the Frontier team agree about the vehicles and facilities that will be included in the assessment and the Master Plan. We discuss the format and level of detail in the plan and other deliverables to make sure it meets the City’s needs for specific information to use for other purposes, such as a Climate Action Plan. We also seek to understand each department’s motivating factors and timelines for a transition.

2. Roles and responsibilities: We will clarify expectations of each person in the team and communication preferences. This helps everyone be efficient with time and clearly understand who to include in project meetings and data requests.

3. Data intake: We will review the data requests and templates we sent prior to meeting, identify the information the City has, and set a process and timeline for collecting other data. We also gather your:
• Method of calculating total cost of ownership (TCO) and determining out-of-cycle vehicle replacement, which may include procurement expenses and staff support • Process and policies for fueling and contracts for fuels • Current vehicle electrification plans, including established contracts with charging station and vehicle providers
• Approval and procurement processes (e.g., requirements for competitive bids, public input, council or commission approval)
• Current and planned participation in incentive programs and pilot projects Scope of Work Scope of Work

At the end of the meeting, we will create a meeting schedule that respects City staffs’ time and create an action plan for obtaining missing information. Within three business days, Frontier will provide a meeting summary with action items and assignments and a program management plan with deliverable due dates and milestones. Frontier will set up a shared document folder on SharePoint or Google, as desired by the City, to ensure all team members have access to timelines, reports, and deliverables.

Task 1. Vehicle Analysis and Replacement
Because we’ve worked with dozens of municipal fleets, we are familiar with the challenging duty cycles of public works, public safety, and emergency preparedness and response vehicles.

To gather data about your fleet, we’ll set up a data transfer from Roseville’s asset management or telematics systems, if available, and then identify gaps. If needed, we can issue driver surveys, get odometer readings, or conduct individual department meetings. For many vehicle types, the Frontier team can make assumptions based on duty cycles of vehicles in cities similar to Roseville. Table 1 shows the data we collect and alternatives when the desired information isn’t available.

Table 1: Vehicle Data Collection
Desired Vehicle Information Alternative #1 Alternative #2 Vehicle ID/VIN, make, model,
model year, vehicle type/class, fuel
type, owned or leased
Vehicle ID, make, model, vehicle
type/class, fuel, owned or leased
Make, model, vehicle type/class,
fuel, owned or leased
Date vehicle placed into service
and scheduled to be replaced
Estimated life cycle (years or
miles)
Blank if no schedule
Original cost, expected surplus
proceeds, and budgeted
replacement cost
Original cost and budgeted
replacement cost
Original cost or budgeted
replacement cost
Assigned division Assigned department Specific vehicle use case Vehicle dwell times by address Addresses where vehicles park during the day and overnight
Domicile address
Daily duty cycle: days of the week,
hours in operation, average miles,
driver assignment, primary use
Weekly duty cycle: days of
the week, hours in operation,
average miles, driver
assignment, primary use
Assumption data for vehicle
class from team
Fuel data or telematics data One year of data from each vehicle
Assumption data from team
Annual O&M cost: fuel,
maintenance, insurance, licensing,
fuel infrastructure
Annual O&M cost: subset Assumption data from team
Special equipment or
configuration (e.g. liftgate, genset)

N/A N/A
Yes/No for emergency
preparedness, response or
recovery

N/A N/A

We work collaboratively with City staff and department heads to evaluate vehicle use and suitability to task, and identify EVs that are currently available or will be soon. As desired, the team can recommend low- and zero-emission options like hydrogen fuel cells, low-NOx engines with renewable natural gas, and battery assist devices like power takeoffs (PTOs) and auxiliary power units (APUs). Frontier maintains databases of on-road and off-road zero and near-zero emission vehicles in all weight classes, suitability to duty cycle, vehicle costs, and available incentives.

To create the vehicle replacement plan, we work collaboratively with City staff and department heads (as desired) to evaluate current vehicles’ use and suitability to task. The Frontier team can identify vehicles that appear to have low use and those that seem mismatched to the task so that staff can make decisions about consolidating vehicles—which may mean shared pool EVs or electric bikes—and right-sizing makes and models. For example, one fleet client is replacing some Chevy Tahoe SUVs with Chevy Bolts when we learned that the department preferred smaller cars that were easier to park.

We will develop a 10-year one-to-one vehicle replacement plan based on the City’s desired strategy: oldest vehicles first, greatest GHG reduction, best operational savings, regulatory compliance, etc. The plan will be specific through 2025, and broader after 2025 to accommodate additional EV availability. For vehicles that are not feasible for EV transition, the team can recommend low- and zero-emission options like hydrogen fuel cells, low-NOx engines with renewable natural gas, and battery assist devices like power takeoffs (PTOs) and auxiliary power units (APUs) and, if needed, provide justifications that ACF may require.

The replacement plan will clearly address a strategy for ACF compliance and with the proposed changes to Advanced Clean Cars.

To estimate EV replacement cost, we use an average cost for the class of EV before incentives and rebates, and then show incentives on a separate line to plan the budget more accurately.

Deliverables: A technical memo that summarizes findings and recommendations and Excel spreadsheets with energy calculations.

Task 2. Infrastructure Requirements
The Frontier team will gather baseline electricity use at municipal fleet parking facilities, existing electricity rates, and planned electrical service changes that might include adding distributed energy systems (microgrids, solar and/or battery storage). We identify facilities that will likely change in the next five years, like a planned department move or upgrades that may include changes or upgrades to electrical service. We will reference facility studies and as-built drawings that show the existing electrical panel, transformer, and single line wiring diagrams and layouts of parking facilities.

During data collection at project kick-off, the team will collect the information in Table 2 with alternatives for when the desired information isn’t available.

Table 2: Facility Data Collection
Desired Facility and Fuel Information Alternative #1
Locations of vehicle domiciles N/A
Facility ownership N/A
Output of onsite PV Picture of the PV panels
Existing or planned EVSE N/A
Planned facility changes N/A
Usage data from existing EVSE and other fueling infrastructure N/A if no existing EVSE Electric meter readings at each domicile N/A
Based on the EV replacements identified in Task 1, we estimate EV charging needs and project resulting electric loads at each fleet domicile by:
• Identifying charging infrastructure types (i.e., Level 1, Level 2, DCFC) and numbers of charging stations at each facility based on a recommended EV charging strategy according to estimated daily duty cycles.
• Estimating the additional electric load for fleet charging at each facility based on the existing fleet vehicle’s duty cycles, and potential to use load or charge management software to manage and flatten the electrical load to reduce demand charges and avoid unnecessary electrical system upgrades. • Estimating charging infrastructure capital costs based on existing and planned charging station purchasing agreements and procurement contracts, if available, or average costs from similar projects we’ve performed in central California.
• Detailing available electrical service capacity to serve each fleet domicile, the fee structure of expanding electrical service per kWh, and known fixed costs to supply additional electrical service if projected loads from new chargers exceed capacity.
• Recommending alternative strategies that may include using public charging stations, home-based charging, creating charging hubs or plazas, or using hydrogen or other low-carbon fuels.

We conduct virtual and physical site assessments to make sure that the facilities can accommodate charging stations, which includes distance from the electrical service, capacity of the panel and transformer, and potential improvements to the parking lot. For example, a DCFC in the corp yard might reduce the space a truck needs for turning; a charging station is that available to the public must be adjacent to an ADA accessible parking space. If desired, we can also recommend potential facility upgrades or improvements to increase efficiency and decrease utility costs. We’ll coordinate with Roseville Electric about new, upgraded, planned, and expanded electrical service to identify the utility’s capacity and identify potential barriers.

Task 3. Charging Strategies
The Frontier team uses DKS’s Charging Strategy Cost Evaluation Tool to assess the cost-effectiveness of five charging strategies, pictured below, based on expected charging demand and procurement/installation costs for each selected fleet charging facility and considers a phased approach that includes “stub outs” to reduce future construction costs.

DKS’s EVSE Operational Cost Evaluation Tool calculates annual operating costs via dynamic cost modeling.

The tool considers multiple inputs that include electricity rate structure and consumption, electricity demand and time-of-use charges, equipment depreciation and maintenance, parking revenues, network fees, and labor for facility staffing. It can also estimate cost recovery by participating in credit programs and revenue from public charging. Outputs show expected energy use trends as EVs enter the fleet.

Many of our municipal fleet clients are increasingly concerned about how to charge fleet vehicles, especially police and other mission-critical assets, during power outages. We evaluate the potential and costeffectiveness of resiliency strategies that include backup generators, distributed energy microgrids (solar and micro wind), and bidirectional charging including vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V), vehicle-to-building (V2B), and vehicle-to-grid (V2G) connectivity.

Deliverables: A technical memo that summarizes types, numbers, and locations for charging stations; and Excel spreadsheets energy use trends.

Task 4. Projected Costs and Sources of Revenue
During costs projections, the Frontier team estimates capital costs for vehicles and infrastructure, annual operating costs and savings, and the total cost of ownership. We will separate the costs of vehicles that the City must purchase to comply with ACF and with proposed changes to Advanced Clean Cars that may effect light-duty vehicles. Frontier closely monitors pending regulations.

For charging stations, we evaluate multiple owner/operator models. Increasingly, we see cities implement charging as a service in which the charging station manufacturer, like ChargePoint, or a third-party, like ABM, owns and maintains the charging stations and collects a fee each time a vehicle (fleet or public) uses the charging station. Other cities, like Houston, are using bond-type financing to pay for the charging stations and vehicles, and the city pays a flat fee per year until the “bond” is repaid.

Once the City has selected an owner/operator model, we calculate annual operating costs by using a dynamic cost modeling tool that includes electricity rate structure and consumption, electricity demand and time-of-use charges, equipment depreciation and maintenance, network fees, and labor for facility staffing. We can also estimate cost recovery by participating in utility demand-management programs, Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) credits, and revenue from employee and/or public charging. If desired, we can also evaluate the cost-effectiveness of vehicle-to-grid integration.

The team will also address barriers to fleet transition. From other projects, we know that barriers include availability of EVs suitable to near-term fleet needs, difficulty in competing for incentives, the cost and delay of electrical upgrades such as adding transformers, and the long lead time for procurement that doesn’t align with municipal budgets. Frontier is currently conducting a nationwide research project to identify operational and behavioral barriers to fleet electrification and will leverage those results in this task.

Throughout the project, we will present timely information about grant funding, and incentive and rebate opportunities.

After collaborating with City staff, the team will recommend one or more strategy for funding the capital and O&M costs that aligns with the selected phased approach for implementation. Examples of financial strategies include:
• Establishing a fuel surcharge for fleet vehicles’ gasoline and diesel use. A penny or two per gallon charged to each department can create a funding mechanism to finance EVs and charging stations, or a pool of matching funds to leverage for potential grants. • Alternative financing through infrastructure-as-a-service or low-interest loans that will be available to municipalities in 2023 through the California Alternative Energy and Advanced Transportation Financing Authority (CAEATFA).
• A shared ownership model in which the fuel vendor—electricity, hydrogen, or renewable fuel— builds and operates shared infrastructure on City owned property. The fuel is available to City vehicles at pre-negotiated prices (the baseload) and the operator can sell fuel to other drivers at market rate.

Deliverables: A technical memo that summarizes total costs by department and the selected financial strategy; a summary of incentives, grants, and rebates

Task 5: Policies, Training, and Technology
During meetings with City staff, the project team will collect information about existing processes, polices, and procedures about vehicle maintenance, vehicle fueling, take-home vehicles, expense reimbursement and chargeback methods, and staff training. We anticipate that some policies and processes will vary by department and vehicle type. We also anticipate that policies and practices don’t match because practices often evolve over time to represent the needs and priorities of the City and of the department.

Charging station vendors and EV manufacturers have training programs for maintenance staff and technicians, and for staff that will use the reporting and tracking software. Data can become overwhelming, and it may be beneficial to have multiple people from fleet, facilities, and IT learn the management apps.

Because the City is changing to a new fleet management system, we can work with staff to identify the data the City needs to collect and analyze to make decisions and take action that can reduce costs and improve safety, and which data is simply interesting to collect and review.

Most charging station vendors offer an on-boarding program to help staff become familiar with the EVs and to set up a personal code on the charging station app. We recommend that clients use all the resources from the vendors, and will help you create a checklist that employees complete and file with fleet (or HR) to show that they read the policies, have charging station access, and agree to the City’s safe driving policies.

We’ll also work with you to develop EV-specific policies that may include the topics shown below.

Deliverables: A technical memo that summarizes recommendations; language for policies Trip Length
You may encourage EVs for long
trips to reduce GHG emissions
and cost or discourage EVs
due to public charging station
availability.

Cost Allocation
Documents how departments
will account for the energy used
to charge EVs and fees to cover
charging station operating costs.

Reimbursement
Describes reimbursing
employees for charging takehome EVs and fleet use of public charging stations.

Problems
Describes the process to report
technical problems with EVs and
charging stations; should include
how to report issues to service
providers.

Complaints
Describes the process to report
behavior-related complaints like
an uncharged EV or a non-EV
parked in an EV charging spot.

When to Plug In
Clarifies when the driver is
responsible for charging the car,
which could be remaining range
(e.g., 100 miles), state of charge
(e.g., 50% battery capacity) or
frequency (e.g., every third use).

Shared Use
For charging stations that
are shared with fleet EVs,
employees, and/or the public,
this addresses times of day/
days of the week that employees
can use fleet charging stations,
a time limit for parking in an
EV space, towing or ticketing
unauthorized vehicles, a
charging station surcharge for
non-fleet vehicles, and use of an
“OK to Unplug” placard.

Example EV Policies

Task 6. Phased Master Plan
Using the outputs from other tasks, the Frontier team will provide a roadmap for project implementation by phase—blocks of years that we will define with City staff. The roadmap will be specific in the early years and more general in later years to allow for flexibility for technology innovation, and will be based on projected EV industry trends, Roseville’s fleet vehicle replacement schedules, available incentives, the lead time for infrastructure, and City budget constraints.

The Master Plan is a digital dashboard on a passwordprotected website that the City has access to after the project. Users can filter recommendations by department, location, and year and can change the implementation
timeline to see the cost and GHG effects of speeding up and slowing down implementation. The Frontier team can also provide a written report and PowerPoint presentation for City Council and/or city commissions, and will provide
drawing, text, and calculations the City needs for grant applications.

The Master Plan will address:
• A procurement schedule for light- medium- and heavy-duty on road vehicles that considers Roseville’s unique use cases and compliance with pending regulations for ZEV adoption. • The number, type, and location of EV charging stations needed to support full fleet electrification and, if applicable, recommend alternatives that may include other fuels, like hydrogen or carbonnegative renewable natural gas. • A recommended roll-out schedule for charging station deployment that pairs charging with vehicle arrival and minimizes construction costs.
• Strategies to reduce operating costs that may include third-party software, different vehicle domiciles, shared charging stations, building retrofits to improve site efficiency, and others. • Capital costs for vehicles, charging stations, and infrastructure by location and by department and by phase, and potential incentives and grants. This can include staffing costs. • Operating costs for vehicles, charging stations, and staff by location and by department, and potential charge-back and revenue opportunities.
• Backup systems that can provide resiliency for EV charging and mission-critical operations. • Data and information that the City wants to collect and analyze to improve operations and data collection and reporting that grants and incentives require. Software systems and training needed to support data collection, reporting, and management.
• Best practices for charging station use, which may include sharing EVSEs with employees and public, training for drivers and maintenance staff, and communications with staff and residents about the EV transition.

Deliverables: Phased Master Plan as a digital dashboard, PDF, and PowerPoint; all materials developed during the project.

Project Management
Frontier Energy has a record of deploying successful projects with aggressive timelines. Frontier uses project management tools to set and manage milestones, due dates, and task assignments by person. All members of the team will have access to the tool, which helps keep the whole project on schedule and budget and enables quick identification and resolution of potential challenges. All program documents and files, except those sensitive information, are in a shared Microsoft Teams “team” and document folder to ensure all partners have access to timelines, reports, and deliverables. If the City prefers a different platform for collaboration, Frontier will accommodate that choice.

TAB F: Cost
“They’re good about following contract requirements.

They’ll often go above and beyond requirements.”
Client quote from Frontier Energy
2020 “Voice of the Customer” Survey

The team of Frontier Energy and DKS Associates propose a not-to-exceed amount based on five months of work. The budget is the same terms and rates as our existing municipal contracts and includes expenses to be charged to perform the services proposed to accomplish the objectives of the RFP.

Task/Subtask Labor
Hours
Labor
Cost
Expenses Task Total
Task 0: Project Management $9,385
Kickoff meeting and program planning 14 $2,507
Project meetings and progress reports 41 $6,878
Task 1: Vehicle Analysis and Replacement $28,055
Gather and validate data 63 $8,990
Identify market-ready EVs and ACF compliance 35 $4,990
Estimate electrical demand for replacement EVs at
each facility
40 $7,825
Develop vehicle replacement plan and make available
on an interactive digital dashboard
41 $6,250
Task 2: Infrastructure Requirements $10,426
Review fleet domicile facility electrical drawings 9 $1,675 Review existing and planned charging stations for
fleet, employees, and visitors
4 $850
Interview facility staff 16 $3,028
Review utility bills at each facility 7 $1,053
Calculate available electrical capacity for each facility and estimate costs to upgrade
22 $3,820
Task 3: Charging Strategies $9,547
Evaluate charging strategies 9 $2,110
Identify EV chargers needed at each facility 5 $1,030
Determine optimal locations to install charging
stations
14 $2,800
Conduct field visits to inspect fleet facilities 5 $825 $62 Evaluate resiliency options 12 $2,720
Cost

Task/Subtask Labor
Hours
Labor
Cost
Expenses Task Total
Task 4: Projected Costs and Revenue $25,580
Estimate capital costs for vehicles and multiple EV
charging project components
51 $6,450
Estimate operating costs of vehicles and EV charging
stations
73 $10,260
Identify barriers to electrification 13 $1,870
Summarize available and anticipated project funding
and incentives
12 $1,620
Develop a financial strategy for implementation 28 $5,380 Task 5: Policies, Training, and Technology $8,052
Review existing policies and recommend updates 17 $2,370 Identify training needs and options for training 11 $1,370 Identify data needs and technology options 18 $4,312
Task 6: Phased Master Plan $29,872
Develop a phasing strategy for implementation 20 $3,520 Develop a digital dashboard 52 $9,750
Prepare draft report 43 $8,494
Finalize report based on feedback 29 $5,234
Develop and deliver PowerPoint presentation 14 $2,874
Not-to-exceed cost proposal $120,917

Category 2022
President 300
Vice President 295
Sr. Director 295
Director / Principal Consultant 275
Sr. Manager / Engineering Manager 245
Manager 218
Sr. Engineer / Sr. Program Mgr 198
Engineer / Program Mgr 165
Sr. Program Consultant / Sr. Analyst 150
Program Consultant / Analyst 130
Sr. Program Coordinator / Sr. Technician 110
Program Coordinator / Technician 95
Program Associate 79
Administrative 75

1. All rates in US Dollars and Subject to Change at the Discretion of Frontier Energy, Inc.

2. Materials, supplies, and travel billed at actual cost

3. Mileage billable at the allowable IRS rate.

Schedule of Hourly Rates
2022 rates will be escalated with cost-of-living increases in following years.

Fee Schedule
Effective January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022
ENGINEERS and PLANNERS TECHNICIANS and SUPPORT STAFF
Grade Hourly Rate Grade Hourly Rate Tech Level Hourly Rate Grade 1 $ 55.00 Grade 32 210.00 Tech Level A $ 35.00
Grade 2 60.00 Grade 33 215.00 Tech Level B 40.00
Grade 3 65.00 Grade 34 220.00 Tech Level C 45.00
Grade 4 70.00 Grade 35 225.00 Tech Level D 50.00
Grade 5 75.00 Grade 36 230.00 Tech Level E 55.00
Grade 6 80.00 Grade 37 235.00 Tech Level F 60.00
Grade 7 85.00 Grade 38 240.00 Tech Level G 65.00
Grade 8 90.00 Grade 39 245.00 Tech Level H 70.00
Grade 9 95.00 Grade 40 250.00 Tech Level I 75.00
Grade 10 100.00 Grade 41 255.00 Tech Level J 80.00
Grade 11 105.00 Grade 42 260.00 Tech Level K 85.00
Grade 12 110.00 Grade 43 265.00 Tech Level L 90.00
Grade 13 115.00 Grade 44 270.00 Tech Level M 95.00
Grade 14 120.00 Grade 45 275.00 Tech Level N 100.00
Grade 15 125.00 Grade 46 280.00 Tech Level O 105.00
Grade 16 130.00 Grade 47 285.00 Tech Level P 110.00
Grade 17 135.00 Grade 48 290.00 Tech Level Q 115.00
Grade 18 140.00 Grade 49 295.00 Tech Level R 120.00
Grade 19 145.00 Grade 50 300.00 Tech Level S 125.00
Grade 20 150.00 Grade 51 305.00 Tech Level T 130.00
Grade 21 155.00 Grade 52 310.00 Tech Level U 135.00
Grade 22 160.00 Grade 53 315.00 Tech Level V 140.00
Grade 23 165.00 Grade 54 320.00 Tech Level W 145.00
Grade 24 170.00 Grade 55 325.00 Tech Level X 150.00
Grade 25 175.00 Grade 56 330.00 Tech Level Y 155.00
Grade 26 180.00 Grade 57 335.00 Tech Level Z 160.00
Grade 27 185.00 Grade 58 340.00 Tech Level AA 165.00
Grade 28 190.00 Grade 59 345.00 Tech Level AB 170.00
Grade 29 195.00 Grade 60 350.00 Tech Level AC 175.00
Grade 30 200.00 Grade 61 355.00 Tech Level AD 180.00
Grade 31 205.00 Grade 62 360.00 Tech Level AE 185.00
 Project expenses will be billed at cost plus ten percent for service and handling. Project expenses include projectrelated costs such as reproduction through outside services, transportation, subsistence, delivery/postage, and vendor and subcontractor services.
 All invoices are due and payable within 30 days of date of invoice. Invoices outstanding over 30 days will be assessed a 1 1/4 percent service charge, compounded, for each 30 days outstanding beyond the initial payment period. Service charges are not included in any agreement for maximum charges.

TABS G-I: Required
Documents and Statements
“Follow-through is the most important thing to me when
working with a consultant. Frontier is very good on this.” Client quote from Frontier Energy
2020 “Voice of the Customer” Survey

TAB G: Required Statements/Documents
• Frontier Energy will not substitute designated members of the team without approval by City staff. • Frontier can and agrees to fulfill the indemnification and insurance requirements contained in the sample contract. Frontier will supply the requested insurance information and name the City of Roseville as a co-insured.
• Nothing in this proposal is proprietary information.

TAB H: Exceptions
• None
TAB I: Competency of Proposers
Frontier Energy has the necessary facilities, ability, experience, and financial resources to provide the services specified herein in a satisfactory and timely manner. Frontier Energy does not have any pending bankruptcies, liens, stop payment notices, judgments, lawsuits, arbitrations, mediations, foreclosures, or any similar actions filed or resolved in the past seven (7) years. A client has never terminated a contract with our firm for breach.

Attachment A
PROPOSER’S CERTIFICATION
I hereby propose to furnish the goods or services specified in the Request for Proposals (“RFP”). I agree that my proposal will remain firm for a period of up to ninety (90) days in order to allow the City of Roseville (“City”) adequate time to evaluate the qualifications submitted.

I have carefully examined the Request for Proposals and any other documents accompanying or made a part of this RFP. The information contained in this proposal is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and is signed under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California. I further certify that I am duly authorized to submit this proposal on behalf of the firm as its authorized agent and that the firm is ready, willing and able to perform if awarded the contract.

I further certify that this proposal is made without prior understanding, agreement, connection, discussion, or conspiracy with any other person, firm or corporation submitting a proposal for the same product or service; that this proposal is fair and made without outside control, collusion, fraud or illegal action; that no officer, employee or agent of the City or any other proposer is financially interested in said proposal; that no undue influence or pressure was used against or in concert with any officer, employee or agent of the City in connection with the award or terms of the contract that will be executed as a result of this RFP; and that the undersigned executed this Proposer’s Certification with full knowledge and understanding of the matters therein contained and was duly authorized to do so.
_Frontier Energy, Inc.__________________ NAME OF BUSINESS _________________________________________________

SIGNATURE
__Larry Brand, President_____________________

NAME & TITLE, TYPED OR PRINTED
__12949 Alcosta Blvd., Suite 101, San Ramon, CA 94583-1323

MAILING ADDRESS
__(510) 444-8707_______________________________________________ TELEPHONE NUMBER [email protected]____________
EMAIL
Type of Organization:
____ Sole Proprietorship __X__ Corporation __CA__ State of Incorporation ________ Partnership ____Limited Liability Company

Attachment C

NONCOLLUSION DECLARATION TO BE EXECUTED BY

BIDDER AND SUBMITTED WITH BID
The undersigned declares:

I am the _President___ of __Frontier Energy, Inc.__, the party making the foregoing bid.

The bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation. The bid is genuine and not collusive or sham. The bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a false or sham bid. The bidder has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any bidder or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or to refrain from bidding. The bidder has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the bidder or any other bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other bidder. All statements contained in the bid are true. The bidder has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, to any corporation, partnership, company, association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof, to effectuate a collusive or sham bid, and has not paid, and will not pay, any person or entity for such purpose.

Any person executing this declaration on behalf of a bidder that is a corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited liability company, limited liability partnership, or any other entity, hereby represents that he or she has full power to execute, and does execute, this declaration on behalf of the bidder.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration is executed on __June 22, 2022______ [date], at __West Sacramento_______ [city], __CA___________ [state].
____________________________________
(Signature of Declarant)

Resumes
“Follow-through is the most important thing to me when
working with a consultant. Frontier is very good on this.” Client quote from Frontier Energy
2020 “Voice of the Customer” Survey
C. White - 1
Chris White
Senior Manager

PROFILE
Chris White has been with Frontier Energy since 2004. She directs engagement and outreach activities, develops vehicle electrification strategies and roadmaps, creates fleet transition plans, and plans and implements pilot programs. Under her supervision, Frontier Energy staff conduct extensive market research, develop print and digital marketing materials, conduct community and stakeholder outreach, and develop models for vehicle adoption. Chris’s clients include air districts, state and local governments, associations, utilities, and private companies.

EDUCATION/CERTIFICATIONS/TRAINING
B.A., Communications, Union University, California
TOP-certified meeting facilitator

FRONTIER ENERGY EXPERIENCE
MCE – 2022-present
• Technical consulting for EV adoption, EVSE planning, and calculating electrical loads Madera County (CA) Transportation Commission – 2021-present • Forecast deployment of battery and fuel cell electric vehicles through 2040 • Identify barriers and opportunities to speed deployment and adoption of ZEVs SMUD Medium- and Heavy-Duty Blueprint – 2021-present
• Assess the adoption of Class 3 and above ZEVs through 2045 • Identify locations and grid capacity for charging stations and hydrogen stations • Facilitate technical panels, financing workgroups, and equity-focused outreach City of Davis (CA) – 2021-present
• Developing a prioritization plan for public charging stations in Davis • Lifecycle cost analysis to identify the net present value of various ownership models City of Sacramento (CA) – 2022-present
• Facilitate a technical panel to consider the impacts of a building electrification ordinance SMUD Multifamily Program – 2020-present
• Lead outreach to multifamily property owners and managers • Provide technical consulting to multifamily properties that want to install EV charging stations C. White - 2
California Air Resources Board Zero Emission Truck Pilots – 2018-present • Leading outreach, market research, and workforce engagement • Oversee data collection and analysis
Various Training and Workforce Programs – 2017-present
• Community outreach and planning for hydrogen readiness efforts. • Conducted focus groups about alternative transportation for the U.S. Department of Energy. • Manage DOT-funded HazMatVirtual virtual reality training for fire departments.

Private clients – 2021-present
• On-call consulting for a regional retailer’s DCFC implementation. • ZEV transition plan for a private construction firm’s fleet of 900 trucks. • Facilitate focus groups about fleet adoption of heavy-duty zero emission vehicles.

Southern California Edison – 2021
• Develop business-focused outreach materials for SCE’s Charge Ready Program City of Sacramento EV Blueprint – 2019
• Researched and wrote a comprehensive plan for citywide public EV charging. • Prepared the City to win a $1.8 million grant from the California Energy Commission.

Sacramento Metro Air Quality Management District Regional ZEV Readiness Plan – 2017-2019 • Developed a set of tools and maps that identify locations for hydrogen stations and DC Fast Charging stations for vehicles that drive 100 miles or more a day in a six-county region.

California Fuel Cell Partnership Communication Director– 2014-2020 • Develop strategy and positioning reports and documents • Plan and execute outreach campaigns and safety training events

ACTIVITIES AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
• 2022 West Sacramentan of the Year award
• 2019 Clean Air Champion Individual Award by Sacramento Clean Cities • 2014 awardee of a Public Relations Society of America Crystal Merit Award • Chair, West Sacramento Community Foundation
• Director, Yolo Basin Foundation
• Chair, West Sacramento Economic Development and Housing Commission • Commissioner, Yolo County Climate Commission
• Member, Association of Women in Water, Energy, and the Environment • Member, Women of EVs
C. White - 1
Thomas Paddon, PMP
Sr. Program Consultant

PROFILE
Thomas Paddon joined Frontier Energy in 2021 to manage fleet transition planning and vehicle electrification projects. He joined the company from CALSTART where he managed high-profile clean transportation projects, developed vehicle electrification strategies and roadmaps, fleet transition plans, and tools to support the transition to zero emissions. Thomas created and executed digital marketing outreach and engagement campaigns for small fleets and to support ZEV programs for disadvantaged communities. He has developed various economic and TCO models for different fleet and market segments, and currently develops digital dashboards and interactive planning tools using PowerBI for each client.

EDUCATION/CERTIFICATIONS/TRAINING
M.A., Management, University of Redlands
B.A., French/Int’l Business, University of South Florida PMP-certified project management professional
Commercial, Instrument-rated SEL Pilot

CURRENT AND PRIOR EXPERIENCE
City of Elk Grove Fleet Transition Planning—present
• Transition planning for municipal fleet vehicles to EVs, including infrastructure, distributed energy systems, and cost analysis.
• Development of interactive digital dashboard.

San Joaquin County Council of Governments—present
• Forecast deployment of battery and fuel cell electric vehicles through 2040. • Identify barriers and opportunities to speed deployment and adoption of ZEVs. • Identify opportunities for green hydrogen production.

Madera County (CA) Transportation Commission—2021-present • Forecast deployment of battery and fuel cell electric vehicles through 2040. • Identify barriers and opportunities to speed deployment and adoption of ZEVs.

SMUD Medium- and Heavy-Duty Blueprint—2021-present
• Project management and reporting to the California Energy Commission.

C. White - 2
Beaufort County (SC) Fleet Transition Planning—current
• Transition planning for municipal fleet vehicles to EVs, including infrastructure, distributed energy systems, and cost analysis.
• Development of interactive digital dashboard
City of Duluth (MN) Fleet Transition Planning—2021-2022 • Transition planning to move the city’s fleet of light-duty vehicles to EVs and plan for charging infrastructure at one facility as a pilot.

East Bay Community Energy (CA)—current
• Transition planning for 14 municipal fleets to EVs, including infrastructure, distributed energy systems, and cost analysis.
• Development of interactive digital dashboards for each fleet.

Spokane (WA) Green Fleet Transition Planning – current
• Transition planning to move the city’s fleet of light-duty, heavy-duty, and construction equipment to renewable fuels and electric vehicles.
• Development of an interactive digital dashboard.

Private Construction Firm – current
• Phase 1 of transition planning to move the fleet of light-duty, heavy-duty, and construction equipment to zero emission vehicles and fuels.

California Air Resources Board Zero Emission Freight Facilities and Truck Demonstrations – 2017- 2021 • Co-managed $30.8M fleet electrification project for Frito-Lay/Pepsi to deploy electric and CNG vehicles and an RNG fueling station in Modesto.
• Managed $12.9M CARB fleet pilot project for Aramark to deploy 21 Class 5 electric step vans and charging stations in the San Joaquin Valley.
• Managed $6.7M CARB fleet pilot project for USPS to deploy 15 Class 4 electric step vans in the San Joaquin Valley.

California Air Resources Board ZEV Mobility Pilot - Green Commuter – 2019 - 2020 • Created and executed multiple digital outreach and needs assessment campaigns to support community-based and environmental justice organizations.

South Coast Air Quality Management District – 2019-2021 • Managed electric school bus data collection program including outreach and engagement. • Developed customized TCO calculator tool for school districts.

Brian Copeland, PE, PTOE—Page 1
MIKE USEN, AICP, Electromobility and
Resiliency Lead
Relevant expertise: Mike Usen leads DKS’ company-wide electric vehicle charging infrastructure planning and design practice. Mike is a nationally recognized subject matter expert in charging infrastructure master planning for light-, medium- and heavy-duty electric vehicles.

With support from DKS’ rapidly growing electromobility team, Mike assists sustainability directors, fleet and facility managers plan smart electric vehicle charging infrastructure for transit systems, electric vehicle fleets as well as public, workplace and residential applications.

Clients include vehicle fleets, regional transportation planning agencies, utilities, ports, school districts, universities and other workplaces. For much of the past three decades, Mike has worked at the intersection of transportation and sustainability for market-leading consulting firms and large public agencies including King County Metro Transit where he developed the agency’s award-winning Sustainability Program.

FLEET ELECTRIFICATION PROJECTS
Port of Tacoma Clean Energy Services, WA. Mike is serving as transportation electrification subject matter expert to help the port electrify its transportation operations. This includes researching best practices, policies, and guidelines for vehicle electrification. Based on this information, Mike will develop an approach to management of fleet electrification process and summary of potential charging strategies.

Seattle Public Schools Sustainability, Resource Conservation and Energy and Carbon Reduction Policies and Procedures, WA. As part of its efforts to decarbonize its operations, Mike is assisting Washington State’s largest school district plan the electrification of its mixed vehicle fleet and yellow school bus operations based on analysis district transportation operations.

Actions include evaluating vehicle fleets for electrification, analyzing alternative charging strategies, assessing facilities for charging capacity, estimating project costs.

City of Bellevue Green Fleet Strategy | Bellevue WA Mike is leading development of Bellevue’s Green Fleet Strategy to replace the City’s existing vehicle fleet with electric vehicles. This involves engaging stakeholders on department operations, conducting a right-sizing analysis, identifying market-ready EVs to replace existing ICE-powered fleet vehicles, and planning for EV infrastructure needs at key City-owned buildings. The project will result in a comprehensive report to guide charger deployment and recommendations for a 5-to-10-year vehicle replacement plan.

City of Spokane Green Fleet Plan | Spokane WA Mike is leading development of an EV charging infrastructure plan for Spokane’s 1,600-unit vehicle fleet. The project will result in a siteby-site plan for charging stations, recommended charging strategy including type of EV charging station, vehicle to charger ratio, load management options, estimated project cost per fleet facility, recommendations for shared charging with employees and the public, implementation phasing timeline for charging system installation, and potential sources of funding from state and federal grants utility incentives and other incentives.

Registrations:

American Institute of
Certified Planners No.
012577
Education: Master of
Urban Planning,
University of
Washington | BA,
Environmental Studies,
University of Vermont
Years of
experience: 30
Brian Copeland, PE, PTOE—Page 2
City of Tacoma Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment Siting Study Feasibility Study | Tacoma, WA. Mike is leading development of Tacoma’s plan to guide EV charging to expand electrification of the City’s fleet and expand EV use by City staff and visitors. This plan also provides information, best practices, and guidance on current and potential future EV charging equipment and standards, EV growth and funding opportunities, performance metrics, and policy and procedure approaches for EVSE siting, operations and shared use opportunities.

East Bay Community Energy Municipal Fleet Electrification Study | Alameda County, CA.

Mike is leading DKS’ efforts to determine vehicle energy requirements and charging needs for the municipal fleets of the cities of Oakland, Berkeley, Dublin, Albany, Hayward, Emeryville, Livermore, Newark, Piedmont, Pleasanton, Tracy, Union City, San Leandro, and Alameda County California, including estimation of fleet electrical load calculations and associated charging infrastructure requirements, and cost evaluations for infrastructure upgrades at each fleet facility. This evaluation also recommends innovations such as dynamic load management, charger sharing, mobile chargers and other technologies.

South San Francisco Electric Vehicle Selection | South San Francisco, CA. Mike evaluated battery electric (BEVs) and plug-in hybrid vehicles (PHEVs) for use by South San Francisco's fleets and recommending which vehicles to purchase. This evaluation considers economics, safety features, vehicle reliability, anticipated public perception and impacts on the City’s mechanic workforce. The report dovetails into South San Francisco’s Electric Vehicle Charging Masterplan, addressing the future of vehicle technology with subsequent periodic updates as new EV products become available.

City of Fremont Fleet Electrification Study | Fremont, CA. This project assessed opportunities for municipal fleet vehicle conversion to plug-in battery electric and the role of solar photovoltaic (PV) renewable energy systems paired with energy storage systems (ESS) and electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE). A key goal of the project was to analyze and propose best practices for both technical solutions as well as planning processes necessary for this transition, sharing these best practices across the region through a working group. Mike’s role on this project is to oversee evaluation of the fleet’s existing energy demands and project the future energy requirements of an electrified fleet by conducting a systematic assessment of all current City-operated vehicles based on a detailed review of departmental vehicle inventories provided by each departmental unit that operates vehicles.

City of Seattle Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment Systemwide Assessment | Seattle, WA.

The City of Seattle is in the process of converting its award-winning 4,100 vehicle motor pool to an all-electric fleet by planning charging infrastructure upgrades at 11 garages, 5 warehouses and over 25 other facilities. Mike’s team evaluated the City's existing facilities, conducted internal stakeholder engagement, assessed the EV market and charging technology, evaluated facility electric load capacity and recommended load management alternatives including planning level project implementation cost estimates.

South San Francisco Electric Vehicle Charging Master Plan | South San Francisco, CA. Mike led the development of a master plan for electrification of City of South San Francisco vehicle fleet through designation and location of electric vehicle charging infrastructure. This masterplan also provides direction to commercial charging for the general public at large employers, commercial businesses, multifamily housing, and public facilities.

Brian Copeland, PE, PTOE—Page 3

EV CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURE INSTALLATION DESIGN
SMUD EV Charging Technical Conditions | Sacramento, CA Mike serves as EV charging subject matter expert helping prepare technical conditions (design specifications) for Sacramento Public Utility District (SMUD). Once complete, SMUD will use the technical conditions to guide EV charger installation for the utility’s Charging as a Service program.

Electric Vehicle Charger Design: Eluminocity | Seattle, WA. DKS Associates provided EV infrastructure design services for Eluminocity, helping the City of Seattle implement the Electric Vehicle Charging in the Right of Way (EVCROW) program, preforming engineering for Level 2 and DC Fast Chargers. Mike oversaw DKS’ services included installation design and design review, facilitating compliance with City of Seattle street-use requirements including permitting of EVSE, and general logistical support related to project implementation.

WSDOT Zero Emissions Vehicle Infrastructure Partnership grant applications | Bellevue & Walla Walla WA. Mike is leading efforts to prepare and submit grant applications on behalf of both cities to apply for state funding for EV charging infrastructure. These grants will fund multiple publicly accessible high powered DC Fast Charging stations consistent with the National EV Infrastructure program funded by IIJA.

PUBLIC CHARGING ROADMAPS
San Joaquin COG Alternative Fuels Vision Plan | San Joaquin County, CA Mike serves as electric vehicle subject matter expert on this county-wide planning effort to site alternative fueling stations serving light, medium and heavy-duty vehicles. Mike’s role is to lead development and implementation of siting methodologies including development of charging and fueling facilities accessible to all users including traditionally underserved populations.

Encinitas Electric Vehicle Charging Station Master Plan | City of Encinitas, CA Mike is leading development of an EV Charging Station Master Plan to evaluate and locate charging stations within the City and up to five (5) miles from the City limits; conducting a needs assessment; defining alternatives; and determining where to install EV charging stations at nearly all City-owned worksites and public facilities; and providing recommendations that would generally support residential transitioning from fossil fuel vehicles to clean transportation options, focused on EVs in the City of Encinitas.

Madera County Zero Emission Vehicle Readiness and Implementation Plan | Madera County CA Mike is leading planning effort to assess the existing Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) infrastructure environment, recommend infrastructure improvements and investments and identify implementation strategies and policies to promote ZEV infrastructure adoption for Madera County communities in both the short- and long-terms. The planning process will identify key community challenges and barriers to ZEV advancement, and provide tools to procure, site and install battery electric vehicles and fuel cell electric vehicle infrastructure.

California Central Coast Zero Emission Vehicle Strategy, CA.

Mike is about to begin work as lead electromobility subject matter expert of a new strategy to improve EV charging infrastructure to support interregional travelers, freight and transit throughout Ventura, Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, Monterey, Santa Cruz, and San Benito counties. Key goals include ensuring access to EV charging for low-income households, multi-family dwellings and rental properties as well as other disadvantaged communities, including Native American Tribal Governments, and rural communities.

Brian Copeland, PE, PTOE—Page 4
Island County Region Vehicle Electrification Study | Island County WA Mike provided research, data & financial analysis, policy development, and public engagement services in the pursuit of vehicle electrification in Island County. These efforts evaluated current and emerging charging technology including chargers, charge management software, and load management, analyze the feasibility of transitioning municipal fleets to Electric Vehicles and coordinate with public works departments on infrastructure needs.

Peninsula Regional Transportation Planning Organization Inventory of Plans, Policies, and Data Regarding EV Readiness | Peninsula Region, WA Mike served as electromobility subject matter expert to PRTPO by advising staff with its goal of developing a suitable strategy for increasing electric vehicle (EV) readiness in the four-county Peninsula Region. The focus of this effort was to assist with collection of appropriate existing information including plans, policies, forecasts, codes, infrastructure, and grid capacity.

City of Davis EV Charging Infrastructure Phase 1| Davis CA Mike is leading an electric vehicle infrastructure analysis project for the City of Davis California. His roles include leading site feasibility and cost analysis, evaluation of several different DC Fast Chargers and smart level 2 public chargers and determining vehicle energy requirements and charging needs to plan for conversion of light-duty fleet vehicles to electric by 2030 including an estimated budget by year for vehicles and infrastructure.

Transit Parking Demand and Mode Transition Study | Solano County, CA. Mike prepared preliminary design concepts to integrate pickup and drop-off facilities for electrified ride hailing, microtransit, car share and bike and scooter share including vehicle charging, coupled with on-site energy storage.

Sacramento Electric Vehicle Implementation Blueprint | Sacramento, CA. Mike’s role included provision of strategies to advance the next generation of ZEV mobility applications and programs, including an EV Toolkit and an advanced EV Mobility Opportunities Report, identifying financially sustainable EV programs to ensure that public spending on EVs and EV infrastructure balances charging demands, advances new technologies, and incentivizes EV rider trips. Mike also prepared an Advanced EV Mobility Opportunities Report and EV Deployment Plan.

WORKPLACE CHARGING
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Electromobility Plan | Berkeley CA. Mike helped LBNL modernize its charging infrastructure recommending standardized hardware, centralized control and monitoring, and an integrated payment system, appropriate for LBNL’s unique site requirements. This evaluation also addressed planning level capital and operating costs as well as recommendations for scaling charging capacity at LBNL as the adoption of EVs continues to expand.

UC Davis Campus Electric Vehicle Study | Davis CA Mike led preparation of an electric vehicle (EV) study by serving as subject matter expert for electromobility. The study and its relation to the University electric distribution system, focuses on load analysis, asset service connections, technical design and operation of smart charging, outlining a flexible infrastructure that will accommodate future adoption of electric mobility and ensures the reliability and resiliency of the University’s electric grid.

Brian Copeland, PE, PTOE—Page 1

YILUN XU, PE, MBA
Electromobility Consultant
Yilun has experience with a variety of electromobility projects on which he applies both his engineering and his business analysis expertise. His specialization includes charging demand management, electrical utility rate analysis, Low-carbon fuel standard (LCFS) credit planning, bidirectional charging planning, and operational cost analysis. Yilun regularly supports DKS clients including counties, cities, transit agencies, and Universities. Yilun has over 9 years of professional experience in the transportation industry, has advanced engineering and business degrees coupled with a strong passion for electromobility.

City of Davis EV Charging Infrastructure Phase 1 | Davis, CA.

Yilun developed a business case comparison for the City of Davis for installing and managing the EV charging infrastructure. The business cases examined ownership alternatives and operational models and explore important aspects of charging such as the charger utilization, charging rates, idling and overcharging management, Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) credit, etc.

City of Bellevue Green Fleet Strategy | Bellevue, WA. Yilun served as the project manager for the Bellevue Green Fleet Strategy project.

Yilun made sure all data is aligned with the analysis needs and actively communicates with the client and the stakeholders to ensure the project is meeting the client’s tight schedule needs. Yilun supported the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) assessment of the EV and Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) fleets and led the operational cost and budget analysis for the project, which involves crucial elements such as the future Washington Clean Fuel Standard.

City of Tacoma Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment Siting Study Feasibility Study | Tacoma, WA. Yilun is serving as the project manager for the Tacoma EVSE siting study. The project aims to develop a strategic action plan for municipal fleet electrification. The project scope covers the entire fleet including light, medium, heavy-duty vehicles, and specialty vehicles, with a focus on the light-duty fleet primarily at 4 domicile sites with the largest fleet vehicle aggregation.

Yilun is also leading the operational cost analysis for the project, which is a critical element of the electrification strategic plan.

City of SeaTac Fleet Electrification Strategy | SeaTac, WA. Yilun is serving as the project manager for the SeaTac Fleet Electrification Strategy project. Yilun is coordinating with both external and internal resources for fleet and facility data, stakeholder interviews, and analytics. Yilun is also leading the data visualization and operational cost analysis of the project.

Registrations:

Washington Professional
Engineer (Civil), No.
19110740 | Minnesota
Professional Engineer
(Civil), No. 54149
Education:

M.S, Civil Engineering
(Transportation &
Statistics minor), North
Carolina State University
| MBA, Carlson School of
Management, University
of Minnesota | B.Eng.,
Traffic Engineering,
Tongji University, China
Years of experience: 9
Relevant Skills:
• Project
management
• Team leadership
• Data analytics
and visualization
• Economic
analysis
• Business case
development
• Sustainability
• Fleet analysis
Brian Copeland, PE, PTOE—Page 2
King County Metro Non-bus Fleets to Zero Emissions | King County, WA. Yilun analyzed the utility rate structures of both major utility providers in King County. Utility rate structures involve base utility rates, demand charging, time-of-day charges, transformer fees, a variety of utility credits, etc. Yilun also developed an operational and maintenance costing tool for EV infrastructure, which has been tremendously valuable for the client. Yilun provided crucial supports to the development of the electric vehicle fleet charging strategies that manage electrical utility expenditures. Yilun also customized an EVSE cost estimator, including EVSE operational costs, to meet the project needs.

Brian Copeland, PE, PTOE—Page 1
GURBIR ANTAAL, Electromobility Engineer
Gurbir is DKS’ most experienced electromobility engineer, especially on fleet electrification projects. On every transportation electrification project, Gurbir combines his electrical engineering background with his transportation operations expertise, using his wide variety of skills relating to the analysis of electric vehicle charging requirements for municipal fleets. Gurbir has served as a trusted advisor for EV-focused projects to public agencies throughout California and Washington State, where he is able to communicate with his public agency clients in a timely manner and truly understand their needs. His relevant project experience includes work for both power providers and public agencies including SMUD, East Bay Community Energy, California Department of Transportation, Berkeley, Fremont, Oakland, San Jose City, Mountainview, Dublin, Alameda County, Hayward, Albany, Davis, and Spokane, King County and Tacoma Washington. He is also to convey technical information to a broad audience in an understandable, approach manner, and made sure all the deadlines are met well in time and overall budget of the projects.

East Bay Community Energy Municipal Fleet Electrification Studies, CA. Gurbir is responsible for calculating the charging needs for each vehicle fleet site for the cities of Berkeley, Hayward, Albany, Dublin, Oakland, and Alameda County. His role as deputy project manager and subsequently project manager, includes field visits, evaluating fleet data, and calculating EV charger quantities required at each site based on electric load calculations, EV battery size and power consumptions for Level 1, Level 2, and DC Fast Chargers. He is also responsible for estimating project costs for each site.

City of Fremont Fleet Electrification Study, Fremont, CA. Gurbir calculated the energy demands of each light and emergency (pursuit) vehicle fleet component and evaluated each of Fremont’s fleet vehicle domicile locations for EV charger installation. He was responsible for evaluating the fleet data, calculating the appropriate quantity of EV chargers required on each site based on the load calculations, EV battery size and power consumptions for Level 2 and DC Fast Chargers.

UC Davis Campus Electric Vehicle Study, Davis CA. Gurbir led site assessment and electrical evaluation of charging infrastructure for an electric vehicle study focused on load analysis, asset service connections, technical design and operation of smart charging at the largest campus in the UC system.

SMUD EV Charging Technical Conditions, CA. Gurbir recently supported Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) and the prime consultant in writing the Technical Conditions per industry standards that describe the scope and standards for the work to be performed for the Charging as a Service program.

Registration: P.Eng,
Canada – 100502010 |
Traffic Signal Level – 1
Supervisor, IMSA
Ontario Work Zone
Traffic Control & Safety
Supervisor
Education: MS in
Electrical and Computer
Engineering, McMaster
University, Canada
| BS in Electronics and
Communications,
Chandigarh Engineering
College, India
Years of experience: 6
Unique Qualifications
for the City of Elk
Grove Project:
• Gurbir has worked
on ten fleet
electrification
projects and three
additional EV
planning projects in
the past three years
• An EV charging
technology and cost
estimates expert
• Currently working
with SMUD
• Electrical load
calculation expert
based on the duty
cycles and dwell
times of the vehicles
Brian Copeland, PE, PTOE—Page 2
City of Davis EV Charging Infrastructure Phase 1,| Davis CA Gurbir is performing technical feasibility and design of public level 2 and DC Fast Charging electric vehicle charging infrastructure for the City of Davis California. This includes conducting site feasibility and cost analysis, determining vehicle energy requirements and charging needs, and performing site design for each charger installation.

City of Tacoma Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment Siting Study Feasibility Study | Tacoma, WA.

Gurbir is serving as the electrical manager for the Tacoma EVSE siting study. The project scope covers the entire fleet including light, medium, heavy-duty vehicles, and specialty vehicles, with a focus on the light-duty fleet primarily at 4 domicile sites with the largest fleet vehicle aggregation.

His role consists of evaluating the fleet data, calculating number of EV chargers required on each site based on the load calculations, EV battery size and power consumptions for Level 1, Level 2 and DC Fast Chargers. Gurbir is also responsible for creating build-out cost’s spreadsheet for each site.

City of Bellevue Green Fleet Strategy | Bellevue, WA. Gurbir leads the charging analysis needs for replacement of light duty fleet vehicles to EVs. His work includes evaluating the electrical energy needs of each type of vehicle and reviewing facilities drawings and calculating number of EV chargers required on each site based on the load calculations and costs for installation of EV chargers.

City of Spokane Green Fleet Plan | Spokane, WA
Gurbir is conducting the charger and cost analysis for replacement of fleet vehicles to EVs by evaluating the fleet data, calculating the number chargers required based on the charging required for Level 1, Level 2 and DC Fast Chargers.

King County Metro Non-bus Fleets to Zero Emissions | King County, WA Gurbir had led the technical evaluation of charging needs for light, medium and heavy-duty nonrevenue fleet vehicles (NRV), ACCESS paratransit fleet as well as the nation's largest rideshare operation. This work includes evaluating the electrical energy needs of each type of vehicle and reviewing facilities drawings and data for passenger facilities and transit bases to evaluate feasibility and costs for installation of EV chargers.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2416
File #: 0721-05
Title: 290 Conference Center Drive - Maintenance Agreement Contact: Suzanne Engelke 916-746-1289 [email protected] Meeting Date: 12/7/2022
Item #: 6.24.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Maintenance Agreement with Roseville Junction, LLC, owner of the property at 290 Conference Center Drive, that outlines the financial obligations for bike trail maintenance and future needed improvements for all parties once the bike trail within this property is constructed.

BACKGROUND
Pursuant to North Central Roseville Specific Plan’s Development Agreement, the owner of 290 Conference Center Drive, Roseville Junction, LLC, is responsible for entering into a Maintenance Agreement with the City that outlines the financial obligations for bike trail maintenance and future needed improvements for all parties once the bike trail within this property is constructed. This trail is to be located within a 40' public easement on private property at 290 Conference Center Drive.

The developer is responsible for upkeep of property improvements within the public easement area, such as retaining walls, landscaping, and fencing. However, the City will be responsible for the maintenance, repair and replacement of the trail.

FISCAL IMPACT
This agreement specifies which parties will be financially responsible for maintenance of the Class I bikeway trail and improvements once built. The City shall be responsible for all maintenance, repair and replacement of the bike trail once constructed. Maintenance repairs will be funded by the Bike Trail Maintenance Fund through Landscape and Lighting Districts and Community Facilities Districts. There is no impact or cost to the General Fund. The developer shall be responsible for all maintenance, repair, and replacement of the other improvements.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a maintenance agreement meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community
Respectfully Submitted,
Suzanne Engelke, Assistant Transportation Planner
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-427
MaintenanceAgreement 290 Conference Center Drive
RESOLUTION NO. 22-427
APPROVING A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR 290 CONFERENCE CENTER

DRIVE, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND ROSEVILLE JUNCTION,

LLC, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT

ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, a Maintenance Agreement for 290 Conference Center Drive, by and between the City of Roseville and Roseville Junction, LLC, has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Maintenance Agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville;
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2433
File #: 1002
Title:

Dry Creek Greenway East Phase 1 Project - Agreements for Acquisition of Real Property and Escrow Instructions
Contact: Cathy Gosalvez 916-746-1300 [email protected] Meeting Date: 12/7/2022
Item #: 6.25.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt resolutions to:

1. Approve the Agreement for Acquisition of Real Property and Escrow Instructions for the purchase of real property from Cirby Hills Townhomes Homeowners Association in the amount of $1,700 for 850 s.f. of Temporary Construction Easement; and

2. Approve the Agreement for Acquisition of Real Property and Escrow Instructions for the purchase of real property from Fallcreek Roseville Partners, L.P. in the amount of $1,550 for 303 s.f. of Temporary Construction Easement; and

3. Approve the Agreement for Acquisition of Real Property and Escrow Instructions for the purchase of real property from Donald Barnes and Marsha Barnes in the amount of $17,200 for 1,586 s.f. of fee acquisition and 2,093 s.f. of ingress/egress/maintenance easement; and

4. Approve the Agreement for Acquisition of Real Property and Escrow Instructions for the purchase of real property from David Littlefield and Beverly Littlefield in the amount of $12,600 for 212 s.f. of fee acquisition and 1,985 s.f. of ingress/egress/maintenance easement; and

5. Approve the Agreement for Acquisition of Real Property and Escrow Instructions for the purchase of real property from Richard Knutson and Anna Knutson in the amount of $15,600 for 1,028 s.f. of fee acquisition and 1,406 s.f. of ingress/egress/maintenance easement; and

6. Approve the Agreement for Acquisition of Real Property and Escrow Instructions for the purchase of real property from Angelo Simone in the amount of $20,450 for 1,543 s.f. of fee acquisition and 1,770 s.f. of ingress/egress/maintenance easement; and

7. Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreements and any other related escrow documents on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BACKGROUND
The Dry Creek Greenway East trail project is a proposed paved multi-use trail along Dry, Cirby, and Linda Creeks from Darling Way/Riverside Avenue to the City limits at S. Cirby Way/Old Auburn Road. The project is identified as a proposed Class I bikeway in the City of Roseville General Plan and Bicycle Master Plan.

Phase 1 of the project will result in two (2) miles of Class I trail from the existing Saugstad Park Trail at Darling Way to the existing Maidu Park Trail at Rocky Ridge Drive.

The City of Roseville obtained the services of Paragon Partners to negotiate the acquisition agreements on the City’s behalf with Cirby Hills Townhomes Homeowners Association, Fallcreek Roseville Partners, L.P., the Barnes, the Littlefields, the Knutsons and Mr. Simone. Pattison and Associates prepared the appraisal reports that determined the “Fair Market Value” for the acquisitions.

The required acquisitions from each property are as follows:

Cirby Hills Townhomes Homeowners Association: 850 s.f. of Temporary Construction Easement in the amount of $1,700
Fallcreek Roseville Partners, L.P.: 303 s.f. of Temporary Construction Easement in the amount of $1,550
Barnes: 1,586 s.f. of fee acquisition and 2,093 s.f. of ingress/egress/maintenance easement in the amount of $17,200.

Littlefield: 212 s.f. of fee acquisition and 1,985 s.f. of ingress/egress/maintenance easement in the amount of $12,600
Knutson: 1,028 s.f. of fee acquisition and 1,406 s.f. of ingress/egress/maintenance easement in the amount of $15,600
Simone: 1,543 s.f. of fee acquisition and 1,770 s.f. of ingress/egress/maintenance easement in the amount of $20,450
These property acquisitions are necessary for construction of the trail. Staff has worked with the design consultant, acquisition team, and the property owners to minimize the trail impact on the remaining parcels. Project construction is planned to begin in Summer of 2023.

Public Outreach:

Since 2008, the Dry Creek Greenway East Project has been driven by robust public participation and community input. There have been multiple community workshops/open houses, stakeholder representative group meetings, online surveys, project email, and social media updates. Staff will continue to engage with the community as the project moves forward.

FISCAL IMPACT
The acquisitions are being funded with Local Transportation Funds (LTF). No General Fund resources will be used for this project. Sufficient funds exist in the approved project budget to acquire the right-of-way and easements.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Adoption of the attached resolution to approve the Agreements for Acquisition of Real Property the Dry Creek Greenway East Project is an action that is subject to CEQA. Project level CEQA compliance for the Dry Creek Greenway East Trail Project was accomplished with preparation of the Dry Creek Greenway East Trail Project Environmental Impact Report (Adopted: March 20, 2019) (SCH No. 2014032087). Because the project is consistent with the project evaluated in the Dry Creek Greenway East Trail Project Environmental Impact Report, no new effects would be expected to occur and all applicable mitigation measures from the Dry Creek Greenway East Trail Project Environmental Impact Report will be implemented. As such, no additional CEQA action is required at this time.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Cathy Gosalvez, Associate Engineer
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-446
Cirby Hills Townhomes Agreement
Resolution 22-447
Fallcreek Agreement
Resolution 22-448
Barnes Agreement
Resolution 22-449
LittlefieldAgreement
Resolution 22-450
KnutsonAgreement
Resolution 22-451
SimoneAgreement
Location Map
RESOLUTION NO. 22-446

APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY (ESCROW

INSTRUCTIONS) FOR THE DRY CREEK GREENWAY EAST PROJECT, BY

AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND CIRBY HILLS TOWNHOMES

HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
WHEREAS, an Agreement for Acquisition of Real Property (Escrow Instructions), by and between the City of Roseville and Cirby Hills Townhomes Homeowners Association, has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it and any other related escrow documents on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby directed to record the Temporary Construction Easement at the Placer County Recorder’s Office on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

Recorded at the Request of and:

When Recorded Return To:

City of Roseville
Attention: City Clerk
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678
DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX: $ None
___ Computed on the consideration or value of property conveyed; OR ___ Computed on the consideration or value less liens or encumbrances remaining at time of sale.

Space above this line is for Recorder’s Use
“Record without fee subject to Gov’t Code 6103
Recordation required to complete chain of title and
is exempt from payment of documentary tax in
accordance with R&T Code 11922”

TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
Assessor's Parcel No: 472-360-079
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Cirby Hills Townhomes Homeowners Association, a California non-profit mutual benefit corporation (“Grantor”) hereby grants to the City of Roseville, a Municipal Corporation (“Grantee”) a thirty (30) month temporary construction easement for construction and construction staging purposes in, over, under and across those portions of real property located in the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California described as:

SEE EXHIBITS “A” AND “B” ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF.

As required in connection with the City of Roseville Dry Creek Greenway East Trail Project, together with the right and privilege of entering upon said land to accomplish purposes described above. The right granted herein shall commence following a forty-eight (48) hour written notice to Grantor by Grantee. The temporary construction easement will commence on May 15, 2023 and end on November 14, 2025.

Dated: Cirby Hills Townhomes Homeowners
Association, a California non-profit mutual
benefit corporation
By:

Name:

Title:

FOR: APN 472-360-079
Live Oak Circle Roseville, CA 95678

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California )
) ss
County of _________________ )
On before me, _____________________________________, Notary Public (Date) (Name of Notary)
personally appeared __________________________________________________________ who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.
(Notary Signature)
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

RESOLUTION NO. 22-447

APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY (ESCROW

INSTRUCTIONS) FOR THE DRY CREEK GREENWAY EAST PROJECT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND FALLCREEK ROSEVILLE PARTNERS., L.P.,

A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARNERSHIP
WHEREAS, an Agreement for Acquisition of Real Property (Escrow Instructions), by and between the City of Roseville and Fallcreek Roseville Partners, L.P., a California limited partnership, has been reviewed by the City Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it and any other related escrow documents on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby directed to record the Temporary Construction Easement at the Placer County Recorder’s Office on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

Recorded at the Request of and:

When Recorded Return To:

City of Roseville
Attention: City Clerk
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678
DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX: $ None
___ Computed on the consideration or value of property conveyed; OR ___ Computed on the consideration or value less liens or encumbrances remaining at time of sale.

Space above this line is for Recorder’s Use
“Record without fee subject to Gov’t Code 6103
Recordation required to complete chain of title and
is exempt from payment of documentary tax in
accordance with R&T Code 11922”

TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
Assessor's Parcel No: 470-060-030
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, FallCreek Roseville Partners, L.P., a California limited partnership (“Grantor”) hereby grants to the City of Roseville, a Municipal Corporation (“Grantee”) a thirty (30) month temporary construction easement for construction and construction staging purposes in, over, under and across those portions of real property located in the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California described as:

SEE EXHIBITS “A” AND “B” ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF.

As required in connection with the City of Roseville Dry Creek Greenway East Trail Project, together with the right and privilege of entering upon said land to accomplish purposes described above. The right granted herein shall commence following a forty-eight (48) hour written notice to Grantor by Grantee. The temporary construction easement will commence on May 15, 2023 and end on November 14, 2025.

Dated: FallCreek Roseville Partners, LP, a
California limited partnership
By:

Name:

Title:

FOR: APN 470-060-030
735 Sunrise Avenue, Roseville, CA 95661

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California )
) ss
County of _________________ )
On before me, _____________________________________, Notary Public (Date) (Name of Notary)
personally appeared __________________________________________________________ who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.
(Notary Signature)
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

RESOLUTION NO. 22-448

APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY (ESCROW

INSTRUCTIONS) FOR THE DRY CREEK GREENWAY EAST PROJECT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND DONALD L. BARNES AND MARSHA G. BARNES AS TRUSTEES OF THE BARNES FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST, UDT JULY 25, 2007
WHEREAS, an Agreement for Acquisition of Real Property (Escrow Instructions), by and between the City of Roseville and Donald L. Barnes and Marsha G. Barnes as Trustees of The Barnes Family Revocable Trust, UDT July 25, 2007, has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it and any other related escrow documents on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby directed to record the Grant Deed and Non Exclusive Ingress/Egress and Maintenance Easement at the Placer County Recorder’s Office on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

RESOLUTION NO. 22-449

APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY (ESCROW

INSTRUCTIONS) FOR THE DRY CREEK GREENWAY EAST PROJECT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND DAVID C. LITTLEFIELD AND BEVERLY A. LITTLEFIELD, TRUSTEES OF THE LITTLEFIELD FAMILY TRUST, DATED MARCH 9, 2006
WHEREAS, an Agreement for Acquisition of Real Property (Escrow Instructions), by and between the City of Roseville and David C. Littlefield and Beverly A, Littlefield, Trustees of The Littlefield Family Trust, dated March 9, 2006, has been reviewed by the City Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it and any other related escrow documents on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby directed to record the Grant Deed and Non Exclusive Ingress/Egress and Maintenance Easement at the Placer County Recorder’s Office on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

RESOLUTION NO. 22-450

APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY (ESCROW

INSTRUCTIONS) FOR THE DRY CREEK GREENWAY EAST PROJECT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND RICHARD E. KNUTSON AND ANNA L. KNUTSON
WHEREAS, an Agreement for Acquisition of Real Property (Escrow Instructions), by and between the City of Roseville and Richard E. Knutson and Anna L. Knutson, has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it and any other related escrow documents on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby directed to record the Grant Deed and Non Exclusive Ingress/Egress and Maintenance Easement at the Placer County Recorder’s Office on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

RESOLUTION NO. 22-451

APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY (ESCROW

INSTRUCTIONS) FOR THE DRY CREEK GREENWAY EAST PROJECT, BY

AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND ANGELO SIMONE
WHEREAS, an Agreement for Acquisition of Real Property (Escrow Instructions), by and between the City of Roseville and Angelo Simone, has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it and any other related escrow documents on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby directed to record the Grant Deed and Non Exclusive Ingress/Egress and Maintenance Easement at the Placer County Recorder’s Office on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

Ascent Environmental 3 Project Description
City of Roseville
Dry Creek Greenway East Trail Project Draft EIR 3-3
Dry Creek Greenway East Trail Project Location

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2413
File #: 0900-04-02
Title:

Washington Boulevard/Andora Bridge Widening Phase 1 (Washington Boulevard Bikeway and Pedestrian Pathways Project) - Notice of Completion Contact: Karen Vences 916-746-1300 [email protected] Meeting Date: 12/7/2022
Item #: 6.26.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council accept the Washington Boulevard Bikeway and Pedestrian Pathways Project as complete and adopt a resolution authorizing the Public Works Director to execute the Notice of Completion.

BACKGROUND
The Washington Boulevard Bikeway and Pedestrian Pathways Project widened Washington Boulevard from Sawtell Road to just north of Kaseberg Drive, and from just north of the Andora Underpass to Pleasant Grove Boulevard. Additionally, the project constructed a multi-use path on the east side of Washington Boulevard from just north of All America City Boulevard to the existing path at the Andora Undercrossing, installed a new traffic signal at Kaseberg Drive, and improved pedestrian and bicycle crossings at existing traffic signals along Washington Boulevard between Junction Boulevard and Pleasant Grove Boulevard. The Washington Boulevard Bikeway and Pedestrian Pathways Project improvements were evaluated in the Washington Boulevard/Andora Bridge Improvement Project EIR, certified by City Council on October 23, 2019 (SCH No. 2016092028).

The Public Works Engineering Division has made the final inspection of the Washington Boulevard Bikeway and Pedestrian Pathways Project and has found the work to be completed in accordance with the improvement plans and specifications. The project is now ready for acceptance. As required by the specifications, the contractor will guarantee the installation of all improvements for a period of 12 months from the date of the Notice of Completion.

FISCAL IMPACT
The project was funded by an Active Transportation Program grant; a Congestion Mitigation Air Quality grant; Local Transportation Funds, Electric Funds - Traffic Signal Maintenance, and Traffic Mitigation Fund resources. No General Fund resources were used for this project.

The final accounting of project costs is ongoing, and staff will be submitting the final reimbursement request to Caltrans for the various grant fund sources in the coming weeks. No additional City resources will be required.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Acceptance of the Washington Boulevard Bikeway and Pedestrian Pathways Project as complete meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Karen Vences, Assistant Engineer
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-423
NOC
Location Map
RESOLUTION NO. 22-423

ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS THE WASHINGTON
BOULEVARD/ANDORA BRIDGE WIDENING PHASE 1 (WASHINGTON BOULEVARD BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS PROJECT), APPROVING THE “NOTICE OF COMPLETION”, AND AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE

SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

1. The “Notice of Completion” on file in the City Clerk’s Department relative to that public work known as the Washington Boulevard/Andora Bridge Widening Phase 1 (Washington Boulevard Bikeway and Pedestrian Pathways Project), has been approved and the public work accepted.

2. The Public Works Director is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY CLERK

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the public work of improvement known as the Project was completed and
accepted by the City of Roseville on . The location is
situated in the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California and is indicated on the attached map, marked as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference. The real property herein described is owned by the City of Roseville, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville CA 95678.

The direct/general contractor on said project was .

The surety on said project was
.
___________________________________
City of Roseville
Owner
ATTEST:
________________________________ _
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
State of California )
County of Placer )
I, , being first duly sworn, depose and say: I am the
of the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation in the State of California, owner of the property described in the above Notice. I am duly authorized to make this verification for and on behalf of the City of Roseville. I have read the Notice of Completion and know its contents and the facts stated therein are true.

___________________________________

City of Roseville
State of California )
County of Placer )
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before
me on this _____ day of ,
20___,
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) who appeared
before me.
____________________________________
Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above Signature of Notary Public A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2430
File #: 0704
Title: Park and Landscape Maintenance - Services Agreement Amendment Contact: Eric Dexter 916-746-1769 [email protected] Meeting Date: 12/7/2022
Item #: 6.27.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve a Second Amendment to Park and Landscape Maintenance Services Agreement with Cagwin & Dorward, and authorize the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City.

BACKGROUND
The Parks, Recreation & Libraries (PRL) Department has the ongoing responsibility to maintain parks and landscapes throughout the City. This work is completed with a combination of internal staff and external contractors. PRL also collaborates with the Environmental Utilities, Police, Fire, Roseville Electric and Public Works Departments as partners on the parks and landscape maintenance services contract to meet their specific landscaping needs. The maintenance of parks, streetscapes and facility landscaping enhances the Roseville community as well as provides a safe environment for the public.

On July 13, 2018, a Request for Proposals (RFP) was released for parks and landscape maintenance services for City parks, streetscapes and facility landscaping. The RFP consisted of service level standards, various exhibits and bid maps. Every area of the City was broken down by district and funding source. Costs for parks were detailed out to include base costs for turf care, pruning, irrigation and porter services separately. This ensured thorough cost proposals and allows more flexibility in the application of the contracts to meet ever changing conditions. Two contractors were chosen to provide these services. As the City grows, parks and landscape maintenance services continue to be evaluated based on budget and service level expectations.

On May 31, 2021 it was decided to terminate the contract with one of the contractors. This result was the need to amend the first contract for Parks & Landscape Service Contract with Cagwin & Dorward, LLC to maintain those areas that were previously under the terminated contractor. This First Amendment expires December 31, 2022, and thus the need for a Second Amendment.

FISCAL IMPACT
The contract cost for Cagwin & Dorward, LLC will have a total not-to-exceed amount of $13,295,000 through the contract end date of December 31, 2024. A total of $12,231,000 is for routine maintenance work, extra work and projects, while $1,064,000 is the estimated amount needed for future parks, streetscapes, and facilities. The funding for each year’s annual maintenance contract will be included in the Parks, Recreation and Libraries, Public Works, Roseville Electric, Environmental Utilities, and Community Facilities District (CFD) and Landscape and Lighting District (LLD) operating budgets. Contract authority will be limited to amounts as approved in each fiscal year's budget.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
CEQA Class 1 - The proposed project involves the minor alteration of existing facilities. This activity is categorically exempt from CEQA as a Class 1 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301). The Exemption was prepared as part of the original agreement and no further CEQA action is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community
Goal E - Deliver exceptional City services
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Eric Dexter, Park, Recreation & Libraries Superintendent Jill Geller, Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-442
SignedAmendment
CEQA exemption
RESOLUTION NO. 22-442

APPROVING A SECOND AMENDMENT TO PARK AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE

SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND

CAGWIN & DORWARD, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT

ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, a Second Amendment to Park and Landscape Maintenance Services Agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Cagwin & Dorward, has been reviewed by the Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Second Amendment is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk
[\\rosenet.loc\rosenetdfs\Desktops\PRL\craigshelby\Desktop\Parks & Landsapce Contract Second Anendement C&D 2022.docx; 10/26/2022]

SECOND AMENDMENT TO

PARK AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT
Parks, Recreation & Libraries
THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT is made and entered into this ___ day of __________, 20__, by and between the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation (“CITY”), and Cagwin & Dorward, a California limited liability company (“CONTRACTOR”); and
W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, CITY and CONTRACTOR previously entered into a Park and Landscape Maintenance Services Agreement dated December 5, 2018 and amended on July 21, 2021 (“Agreement”) regarding Park and Landscape Maintenance Services (“Project”); and WHEREAS, CITY desires to amend the Agreement; and
WHEREAS, CONTRACTOR is willing and able to continue providing park and landscape maintenance services.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

1. Paragraph 1 of the Agreement is amended by adding an additional paragraph to read as follows:
“CITY is exercising its option to extend the term of the Agreement for an additional two year period commencing upon execution and ending on December 31, 2024.”
[\\rosenet.loc\rosenetdfs\Desktops\PRL\craigshelby\Desktop\Parks & Landsapce Contract Second Anendement C&D 2022.docx; 10/26/2022] 2 2. Exhibit “B” to the Agreement is hereby replaced with Exhibit “B” to this Second Amendment to Agreement, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, which reflects additional maintenance expectations.

3. Exhibit “C” to the Agreement is hereby replaced with Exhibit “C” to this Second Amendment to Agreement, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, which reflects updated rates for the term of the Second Amendment to Agreement.

4. Paragraph 3 of the Agreement is amended by adding an additional paragraph to read as follows:
“Compensation for the Second Amendment to Agreement shall not exceed twelve million, two hundred thirty-one thousand dollars ($12,231,000). Compensation for changes in the work as may be directed in writing by CITY shall not exceed one million, sixty-four thousand dollars ($1,064,000). Total compensation for the entire Second Amendment to Agreement shall not exceed thirteen million, two hundred ninety-five thousand dollars ($13,295,000) through the contract end date of December 21, 2024.”

5. Paragraph 2 of the Agreement is amended by adding an additional sentence to read as follows:
“In the event CITY exercises its option to modify CONTRACTOR’s areas of responsibility, CITY will provide notice to CONTRACTOR of the change(s) within five (5) business days.”

6. All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
[\\rosenet.loc\rosenetdfs\Desktops\PRL\craigshelby\Desktop\Parks & Landsapce Contract Second Anendement C&D 2022.docx; 10/26/2022] 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation, has authorized the execution of this Second Amendment to Agreement in duplicate by its City Manager and attested to by its City Clerk under the authority of Resolution No. _________, adopted by the Council of the City of Roseville on the ___ day of ___________, 20__, and CONTRACTOR has caused this Second Amendment to Agreement to be executed. (SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE)

[\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D003\P005\00071051.DOCX; 11/17/2022] EXHIBIT “B”
Revised October 2022

PARKS & LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE

SERVICE LEVELS

CONTRACTOR EDITION
2022 EDITION
1 | P a g e

TABLE OF CONTENTS
GOALS............................................................................................................................2 DEFINITIONS..................................................................................................................3 BASIC MAINTENANCE...................................................................................................4 IRRIGATION....................................................................................................................4 TURF CARE....................................................................................................................5 LANDSCAPE AREAS......................................................................................................5 TREES.............................................................................................................................6 PORTERING ...................................................................................................................7 ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD…………………………………………………………………..10
SERVICE LEVELS ........................................................................................................11 ATTACHMENT A: TREE PRUNING AND TREE MAINTENANCE STANDARDS.........12 2 | P a g e
Goals
City of Roseville
 A high quality of life for our residents, businesses and visitors  Fiscal soundness
 Safe and stable infrastructure
Parks, Recreation & Libraries
Enhance lives and the community by providing exceptional experiences for Roseville residents, businesses and visitors through our parks, recreation and libraries’ facilities
Parks Division
Create and maintain safe, clean and green public spaces Priorities shall be defined based on “safe, clean and green”. When faced with two or more competing tasks, tasks associated with public or staff safety shall be the first priority, tasks associated with cleanliness shall be second and tasks that are aesthetic in nature shall be third.
3 | P a g e

DEFINITIONS
Turf: Grass and the surface layer of soil held together by its roots.

Weed: Any wild plant growing where it is not intended, designed, or desired to be and is growing in competition with cultivated plants.

Component: Any part or aspect of a system that relies on each part to be complete. Examples include a slide is part of a play structure or a valve box is part of an irrigation system.

Site Furniture: Park elements that are placed for the convenience or comfort of the user, such as, a drinking fountain, picnic table or bench.

Access Restriction: A structure, such as a bollard, fence or gate, built to bar passage by either a vehicle or pedestrian.

Beds: Landscape planters or non-turfed (planted) areas.

Bare Areas: Area within the turf area where there is no living plant material.

Undeveloped Park Sites: Portions of a park, slated for future development, but as yet, do not have any constructed improvements.

Natural Areas: Areas within a developed park, but are set aside to remain undeveloped because of a valued natural resource.
4 | P a g e

BASIC MAINTENANCE
The Park, Recreation & Libraries Department has established a base level of maintenance which shall be universally applied to all parks, facilities and streetscapes, unless otherwise noted. In all cases, defects that pose a safety concern shall be reported immediately upon discovery.

IRRIGATION
Irrigation systems and the associated components shall be maintained to ensure public safety and full functionality. The irrigation system shall be managed to ensure proper soil moisture and reduce visible stress of turf or landscaping without disrupting the user’s experience, through efficient use of water.

1. Public Safety:
a. There shall be no standing water in turf, landscaped areas or on pavement. b. Nuisance run-off on or across paved areas due to irrigation shall be eliminated. This creates algae and slippery surfaces.
c. Blown heads which create divots or holes in playing or walking surfaces shall be immediately repaired and backfilled.
d. Tripping hazards due to stuck sprinkler heads, sunken valve boxes, etc. shall be repaired.
e. Overspray onto walkways, fences, walls, roadways or other areas where irrigation is not watering turf or landscaping, shall be prohibited.
f. In cases where repairs require a longer lead time to address, the impacted area shall be properly cordoned off.

2. Water Management:

Irrigation systems shall be programmed to comply with current and applicable Water Efficient Landscape Ordinances (WELO).
a. Park areas:
i. There is a required weekly site walk to spot check the irrigation system.

Adjustments to the system shall be made prior to the next watering cycle. ii. A full irrigation system check shall be performed prior to the start of the irrigation season (March – November). Monthly system checks shall be performed to maintain the system during the season. Repairs shall be completed prior to the next scheduled watering period. This shall include flushing of drip systems.
b. Streetscapes:
i. A full irrigation system check shall be performed during the growing season, at minimum at the start of the growing season (March), mid-way through the growing season (June/July), and at the end of the growing season (November). This shall include flushing of drip systems. 5 | P a g e

TURF CARE
All turf areas shall support the designed uses such as curb appeal and/or informal/nonprogrammed or formal/programmed recreational use. Turf shall be an even surface, with uniform green color during the growing season. The soil moisture level shall be consistent throughout the turfed area, and shall be free of standing water. Bare areas and weeds shall not exceed defined tolerance levels.

1. Maintained Turf heights:
a. Based on assigned service level.
b. At no time shall mowing remove more than 1/3 of the leaf blade.

2. Mowing:
a. Mowing frequencies will be a minimum of one (1) time per week from March through October and bi-monthly from November through February or as needed to prevent clumping.
b. Mulch mowing is the required method, unless otherwise approved. c. Mowing patterns should be alternated to avoid ruts and compaction.

3. Edging:
a. Edging frequency will be based on assigned service level. b. Edging along hardscape shall utilize a blade edger.
c. Edging along valve boxes, utility boxes, poles, etc. shall utilize a string trimmer.

4. Bare areas: Shall be no more than 15% of the total turfed area in a dedicated sports fields. All other areas shall be based on service level.

5. Weeds: Tolerance level shall be based on service level.

6. Aeration: Frequency is based on service level.

7. Seed or sod repairs: Maintain an acceptable turf stand. Repair of turf shall be in the form of either seed or sod depending on the actual use and the schedule of activity at the location. Timing shall be coordinated with area Supervisor.

8. Fertilizer: Fertilizers shall be applied to ensure the health of the turf. Fertilization will be completed as extra work.

LANDSCAPE AREAS: GROUND COVER, PLANTER BEDS and BIO-SWALE PLANTERS All plants shall be maintained in a healthy and attractive condition. Landscaping shall also be maintained to provide secondary functions such as natural barriers, pollution/dust control and/or erosion control.

1. Removal and replacement of plant material: Dead, stunted or severely damaged plant material shall be removed within thirty (30) days of discovery. Replacement planting shall occur in the Spring or Fall seasons and shall be comparable in size to the lost or original plant, up to a maximum of thirty-six inch (36”) boxed specimen, unless otherwise approved.
6 | P a g e

2. Median plant maintenance: At un-signalized left turn lanes, plant material shall be maintained at twelve inches (12”) or lower for a minimum distance of 175 feet as measured from the nose of the median.

3. Trimming: Pruning of shrubs shall be consistent with horticultural standards. Focus shall be on the removal of dead or diseased material, thinning for natural structure/form, and rejuvenation pruning to ensure the health of the plant. Shearing, other than hedges and groundcover edging, shall be limited in use.
a. Trimming of plant material shall be based on service level. The frequency may increase depending on the plant species and the location. b. Ground cover shall be edged as needed to prevent plant growth from extending beyond curbs, sidewalks, roadways, buildings, and turfed edges. c. Hedges along sound walls shall be maintained to within one (1) foot below the top of the adjacent wall or fence.
d. Vines shall be maintained to prevent growth over a wall and onto private property.
e. Plants shall be maintained to ensure proper irrigation functionality and proper coverage.
f. Ornamental grasses and perennial monocots shall be pruned at the end of the growth season to promote new growth and remove dead debris. g. Bio-swales - Shrubs will be pruned to eliminate encroachment into parking lots and walk areas. Trimming of the ground covers or filter plantings will only be on a request basis by City staff not to exceed two (2) times per year. Bio-swales are located at various locations.
h. Hard Fescue that is located in parks, trails, and bio-swales will need to have seed head cut back two (2) times per year in the spring and fall pursuant to coordination with a Parks Supervisor.

4. Annuals: Seasonal color through the planting of flowers shall be installed to completely and evenly fill the planting space. Dead heads, blank spots, and other defects shall not detract from aesthetic of the planting area. Beds shall be weeded and detailed a minimum of once every two (2) weeks.

5. Bark mulch: Replenishment will be discussed and evaluated at an annual review. If bark mulch needs to be added, this would be deemed extra work and billed accordingly.

6. Weeds: Weed control in all areas shall be prevented and/or treated to not exceed service level tolerance for the location.

TREES
Trees shall be maintained using International Society of Arboriculture standards in order to ensure public safety, in addition to the overall health and structural integrity of the tree. Trees shall conform to the general shape and height of the species. 7 | P a g e

1. Pruning: Tree limbs shall be pruned at height of eight feet (8’) or higher for pedestrian clearance over sidewalks, pathways and trails and fifteen feet (15’) or higher over streets and roadways. See Attachment A, Tree Pruning Standards.

2. Staking:
a. Young trees shall be properly staked to encourage a straight trunk (growth) and until roots are firmly established.
b. Proper staking is detailed in the Parks Construction Standards (link provided at end of this document).
c. Once tree is firmly established, stakes shall be completely removed with no protrusion above finish grade or voids/holes in the soil. d. Trees must be straight.
e. Ties on the stakes shall be checked periodically to ensure they are adjusted properly.
f. Tight or damaged ties or stakes shall be replaced or repaired.

3. Removal and Replacement: All severely or irreparably damaged trees shall be removed within thirty (30) days of notice. This includes removal of tree stumps and/or surface roots. Replacement of trees shall be during the Spring or Fall seasons, unless otherwise approved.

4. Tree Wells:
a. Shall be weed free.
b. A well-defined radius of three feet (3’) diameter around the tree trunk shall be maintained for trees located in turf.
c. Use of mechanical controls, such as string trimmers, shall be utilized in a manner to prevent scarring of the tree.
d. No mulch for tree wells located in turf.

PORTERING
All maintained areas shall have a clean appearance. Portering services may be performed by City staff and/or Contractor staff. Please be aware of the standards below for any park or area where portering is assigned to a contractor.

Portering refers to the following items which are described in more detail below:
 Vandalism and Graffiti
 Litter/Trash Receptacle Servicing
 Unpaved or Paved Surfaces
 Access Restrictions
 Playgrounds
 Sports Facilities

1. Vandalism and Graffitti
8 | P a g e
All park assets shall be maintained to ensure proper functionality and shall be free of hazards.
a. Vandalism: All damage cause by vandalism shall be immediately reported upon discovery. Repairs related to safety will be addressed within twenty-four (24) hours of report.
b. Graffiti: All public assets shall be free of graffiti. Upon discovery, photo document the graffiti and send to Parks Supervisory team. Obscene graffiti must be cleaned or covered immediately.
c. Temporary Closures: In situations where vandalized components pose a risk to public safety or alter the intended use, the area shall be cordoned off to prevent public use. A sign indicating the component is temporarily closed for public use shall be posted on site. Any temporary closure shall be immediately reported to the Parks Supervisory team.

2. Litter/Trash Receptacle Servicing
All maintained areas shall have a clean appearance and be free of litter, trash or debris after service is completed.
a. Hazardous debris/litter:
i. Remove hazardous debris immediately upon discovery.
b. Trash receptacles:
i. Shall not be more than 2/3 full.
ii. Shall not have a foul odor.
c. Frequency: Servicing of trash receptacles shall occur a minimum of two (2) days per week or three (3) non-consecutive days per week based on service level.

3. Paved and Unpaved Surfaces
Paved and unpaved surfaces shall be maintained to ensure public safety and cleanliness. Surfaces shall be smooth, less than one-quarter inch (1/4”) height difference between panels, contain no “bird baths,” and be free of weeds, algae, debris, litter, bark, engineered wood fiber or other friable material.

Paved or impervious surfaces: Examples include concrete or asphalt pathways, picnic areas, asphalt parking lots, brick or pavers mortared in place, etc. These surfaces shall be inspected monthly for cracks and raised areas. Tripping hazards shall be immediately reported and repaired.
9 | P a g e
Unpaved or pervious surfaces: Examples include decomposed granite pathways, gravel parking lots, pervious concrete, bricks or pavers set in sand, pea gravel areas within parks, etc. These surfaces shall be inspected two (2) times a year. Holes, divots, cracks and bare areas shall be filled, repaired or replenished upon discovery.

4. Playgrounds
All play equipment and associated resilient surfacing shall be maintained to ensure overall safety and functionality.
a. Resilient surfacing:
i. Friable surfaces: Examples are sand or engineered wood fiber. These surfaces shall be raked smooth a minimum of three (3) non-consecutive days per week to achieve a consistent distribution of material across the entire area within the containment area or as needed. The minimum thickness of material shall be twelve inches (12”). Emphasis shall be placed on high use zones such as swings, slide exits, entry steps, etc. ii. Poured-in-place rubber surfacing shall be free of holes or cracks no larger than a two inches (2”) in diameter +/-.
b. Removal of unwanted material:

Unwanted material or debris that impact the safety, cleanliness or functionality of the play space shall be removed immediately upon discovery.

5. Sports Facilities
Sports facilities include softball fields, baseball fields, soccer fields, horseshoe pits, and outdoor sports courts (basketball, tennis, pickle ball, bocce ball, volleyball, etc.
a. Sports court surfaces: Surfaces shall be cleaned a minimum of two (2) times per month to prevent buildup of sand, leaves, bark mulch, gravel, etc. b. Basketball: Backboards, rims and nets will be clean, free of holes or tears and in good working condition.
c. Horseshoe courts: Backboards and fences shall be in good condition. Rake and fill holes, divots or cracks as needed to prevent trips and falls. d. Sand volleyball courts: Sand shall be raked smooth on a bi-weekly basis, be replenished as needed and be weed free.
e. Dedicated softball/baseball fields: Infields and warning tracks shall be essentially weed free throughout year. Low areas in turf and infields shall be filled upon discovery.
10 | P a g e
Backstops, sideline fences, dug-outs and safety netting shall be free of holes, protruding pieces or broken components

6. Park Signage
a. Visibility of all signage including park identification signs, playground rules, park rules, park namesake biography signs, kiosks, interpretive signs, etc. shall be clear of obstructions such as tree limbs, shrubs or other plant material. b. Text on signs shall be legible and colors shall be consistent. c. Signs shall be securely mounted and located at key points or sight lines for clear visibility.

7. Water Features
a. All water features shall be clean and free of litter and debris.

ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD
When a newly constructed streetscape, Park, or renovated landscape has been completed there shall be a six-month period of maintenance at a higher level to allow for the plants to mature and become established. The expectations for the first 6 months should include:
a. Continued adjustment of the irrigation schedule to match the plant needs, especially water-wise species, soils type, and season
b. Soil probing to measure moisture and ensure the establishment of plants and trees
c. Immediate notification of challenges should there be an issue that needs to be addressed on the construction end.
d. Maintaining the site weed-free

11 | P a g e

SERVICE LEVELS
The chart below outlines differences in allowable tolerances based on the four service levels. Each park or streetscape is assigned a service level and the Contractor is expected to provide maintenance at that level unless otherwise noted. Tasks not listed in the chart below shall be maintained at the basic maintenance level described above.

Premium Standard Core Low
Turf Care
Maintained
between:

Warm season
(Bermuda)
Cool season
(Fescue & Bluegrass)
1”-2”
2”-3.5”
1”-2.5”
2”-3.5”
1”-2.5”
2”-4”
1”-2.5”

2.5”-4.5”
Bare Areas None up to 15% Up to 30% Up to 40%
Edging Every other
week
One every 3
weeks
Once per
month
None
Weeds None
(street frontages,
play/picnic areas,
etc.)
No more than
20%
No more than
40%
No more than 60%
Aeration 2x/year
(minimum)
1x/year
& as needed
1x/year None
Landscaping & Trees
Hedge pruning At top of
fence/wall
Within 1’
under top of
wall/fence
No more than
1’ over top of
fence/wall
Acceptable
Missing plant
material (includes
trees)
None None within
high visibility
areas
In limited
areas (up to
20%)
Acceptable
Weeds None None within
high visibility
areas
In limited
areas (up to
25%)
1-4 applications per
year as budget
allows
Pruning Shrubs 3/x year
(Minimum)
3/x year
(Minimum)
2/x per year 1/x per year
Portering Services (Parks)
Litter/Trash
Receptacle
Servicing
Daily 3 nonconsecutive
days/week
2x/week 2x/month
Playground and
Sports Facility
Raking
4 days/week 3 nonconsecutive
days/week
2 nonconsecutive
days/week
1 time per week
Sports Courts 4 times/month 2 times/month 1 time/month None City of Roseville Parks, Recreation & Libraries Parks Design & Construction Standards can be found on our website at www.roseville.ca.us/parksintheworks.
12 | P a g e
Attachment A
2016 City of Roseville
Tree Pruning Standards & Tree Maintenance Standards
All work shall be performed under the on-site supervision of a licensed and experienced ISA Certified Arborist and Qualified Tree Risk Assessor (TRAQ).

All work shall conform to the current Standards and Best Management Practices of:
 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) A300 for Tree Care Operations- Standard Practices for Tree Pruning and Risk Assessment.
 ANSI Z133.1 Safety Requirements for Arboricultural Operations.  International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Best Management Practices for Tree Pruning, Risk Assessment, Cabling, Fertilization, Tree Planting, IPM.  California Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) General Industry Safety Orders: Tree Work, Maintenance, Removal, Logging, Rigging, Crane and Aerial Devices.

A. Level II Risk Assessment:

On all Routine Cycle Pruning, Grid Pruning and Specialty Pruning the contractor shall perform an ISA level II Risk Assessment (basic assessment) on each tree prior to making any pruning cuts or performing any other tree work. The level II assessment shall be performed by an experienced ISA Qualified Tree Risk Assessor (TRAQ).

B. Routine Cycle Pruning (Grid Pruning): Section 1 to 4  When performing routine cycle & service request pruning, section 1 to 7, contractor shall perform all pruning including structural and clearance pruning.  If a tree has encroached into the high voltage lines contractor shall not be allowed to perform any pruning and shall immediately notify utility provider to clear the tree away from the lines. After the tree has been pruned and the line is cleared by the utility provider the contractor can proceed with the pruning.
 All pruning projects shall be coordinated with the City and approved two weeks prior to start date.
 All traffic controls and bike trail closures shall be approved by the City at least one week prior to project start; see section C 11 (standard requirements).  Equipment use including bucket trucks in parks and golf courses, shall be coordinated and approved by City staff at least two weeks prior to project start.  No trucks over a weight of 6,000lbs pounds shall be driven on concrete pathways.  No trucks or other equipment shall be driven on wet turf.  Before driving on landscape or parks, irrigation main lines and sprinkler heads must be marked by City staff.

1. Structural Pruning including Clearance Pruning: Young Trees (0”-6” DBH) and (7”-12” DBH)
13 | P a g e
a. Prune to manage tree growth and form to maximize safety, structural integrity, and health.
i. Whenever reducing the length of a limb the reduction cuts must be made back to a parent branch with at least 1/3 the diameter of the subordinated limb. ii. Lion tailing will not be allowed.
b. Remove dead branches at the point of attachment; >0.75” in diameter. c. Remove diseased, decayed, broken, weakly attached, and/or crossing branches. d. Develop and/or maintain a central leader.
e. Space main branches along one central leader.
f. Identify the lowest branch in the permanent canopy to facilitate management of lower branches.
g. Keep all branches less than 50% of the trunk diameter to ensure that the branch collar and branch protection zone remain intact.
h. Vertically and radial space scaffold branches 12”-48” apart. i. Reduce growth by subordinating or removing branches with included bark and codominant stems >0.5” in diameter. j. Remove all mistletoe and vines growing on trees.
k. Provide fourteen feet (14’) overhead clearance over roadways and bike lanes. l. Provide eight feet (8’) overhead clearance over walkways, sidewalks, and parking lots. m. The specified pruning may require the removal of up to 30% of the foliage in many instances. Under no circumstances shall more than 40% of the foliage be removed from an individual tree.

2. Structural Pruning including Clearance Pruning, Cleaning, Weight reduction, and Thinning: Intermediate Trees (13”-23” DBH)
a. Prune to manage tree growth and form to maximize safety, structural integrity, and health.
i. On all trees over twenty inches (20”) DBH contractor shall reduce end weight by 25% and maintain a well balanced crown.
ii. Whenever reducing the length of a limb the reduction cuts must be made back to a parent branch with at least 1/3 the diameter of the subordinated limb. iii. Lion tailing will not be allowed.
b. Remove dead branches at the point of attachment.
c. Remove diseased, decayed, broken, weakly attached, and/or crossing branches; >1” in diameter.
d. Develop and/or maintain a central leader.
e. Space main branches along one central leader.
f. Identify the lowest branch in the permanent canopy to facilitate management of lower branches.
g. Vertically and radial space scaffold branches 12”-48” apart. h. Reduce growth by subordinating or removing branches with included bark and codominant stems over 1.5” in diameter. i. On trees with dense foliage, thin crown to allow wind and light penetration into the interior branches.
j. Remove all mistletoe and vines growing on trees.
k. Provide fourteen feet (14’) overhead clearance over roadways and bike lanes. l. Provide eight feet (8’) overhead clearance over walkways, sidewalks, and parking lots. m. The specified pruning may require the removal of up to 30% of the foliage in many instances. Under no circumstances shall more than 40% of the foliage be removed from an individual tree.
14 | P a g e

3. Mature Tree Pruning including Clearance Pruning, Cleaning, Weight reduction and Thinning: Mature Trees (24”+ DBH)
a. Prune to manage tree growth and form to maximize safety, structural integrity, and health.
i. On all trees DBH contractor shall reduce end weight by 25% and maintain a well balanced crown.
ii. Whenever reducing the length of a limb the reduction cuts must be made back to a parent branch with at least 1/3 the diameter of the subordinated limb. iii. Lion tailing will not be allowed.
b. Remove dead branches at the point of attachment; >1” in diameter. c. Remove diseased, decayed, broken, weakly attached, and/or crossing branches. d. Reduce growth by subordinating or removing branches with included bark and codominant stems. e. On trees with dense foliage, thin crown to allow light penetration onto the interior branches.
f. Remove all mistletoe and vines growing on trees.
g. Provide fourteen feet (14’) overhead clearance over roadways and bike lanes. h. Provide eight feet (8’) overhead clearance over walkways, sidewalks, and parking lots. i. Do not remove more than 25% of live foliage from tree unless directed by Urban Forester.
j. Do not remove live branches larger than 8” in diameter without approval from the Urban Forester.

4. Palm Pruning
a. Remove dead fronds, fruits or loose petioles. Dead fronds are those with less than 50% green tissue.
b. Live, healthy fronds above horizontal (9 o’clock to 3 o’clock) shall not be removed. c. Fronds removed shall be severed close to the petiole base without damaging living trunk tissue.
d. Palm peeling (shaving) shall consist of the removal of only the dead frond bases at the point they make contact with the trunk without damaging living trunk tissue.

C. Extra Work: Section 5 to 10

5. Bike Trail Safety Pruning:
a. Prune to manage tree growth and form to maximize safety, structural integrity, and health.
i. On all trees over twenty inches (20”) DBH contractor shall reduce end weight by 25% on the tree’s side that overhangs the bike trail.
ii. Whenever reducing the length of a limb the reduction cuts must be made back to a parent branch with at least 1/3 the diameter of the subordinated limb. iii. Lion tailing will not be allowed.
b. Remove dead branches at the point of attachment; > 1” in diameter. c. Provide fourteen feet (14’) overhead clearance at bike trails. d. Remove diseased, decayed, broken, weakly attached, and/or crossing branches. e. Remove all mistletoe.
f. Prune to clear line of sight for bike trails, traffic signs, signals, and street signs. 15 | P a g e
g. Set up proper traffic control and re-direct pedestrians and bicyclists when working on a bike trail.

6. Clearance Pruning for roadsides, sidewalks, signs and light structures a. Prune to manage tree growth and form to maximize safety, visibility, structural integrity, and health.
i. Contractor shall reduce end weight by 25-50% on the tree’s side that overhangs the roadside, sidewalks, signs and light structures.
ii. Whenever reducing the length of a limb the reduction cuts must be made back to a parent branch with at least 1/3 the diameter of the subordinated limb. iii. Lion tailing will not be allowed.
b. Remove dead branches at the point of attachment; >1” in diameter. c. Provide fourteen feet (14’) overhead clearance at roadsides. d. Provide eight feet (8’) overhead clearance at parking lots, sidewalks, and other pathways.
e. Clear sign or light structure on all sides so that it is visible. f. Balance Tree on road- and sidewalk side

7. Clearance Pruning for Traffic Signal Head & Traffic Sign Obstructions:
a. Prune to manage tree growth and form to maximize safety, visibility, structural integrity, and health.
i. Contractor shall reduce end weight by 25-50% on the tree’s side that overhangs the roadway.
ii. Whenever reducing the length of a limb the reduction cuts must be made back to a parent branch with at least 1/3 the diameter of the subordinated limb. iii. Lion tailing will not be allowed.
b. Remove dead branches at the point of attachment; >1” in diameter c. Provide fourteen feet (14’) overhead clearance at roadsides. d. Provide eight feet (8’) overhead clearance at parking lots, sidewalks, and other pathways.
e. Prune to clear line of sight to traffic signs (stop sign, speed limit sign, etc.) and follow Table A1 for required sight distance.
f. Prune to clear line of sight for traffic signal heads and follow Table A2 for required sight distance.
g. Balance Tree on road- and sidewalk side
Table A1: Required Traffic Sign Sight Distance as a function of speed 16 | P a g e
Speed*
(mph)
Distance
(ft)
20 115
25 155
30 200
35 250
40 305
45 360
50 425
55 495
60 570
65 645
70 730
75 820
* Posted speed, off peak 85th percentile speed prior to work starting, or the anticipated operating speed Table A2: Required Traffic Signal Head Distance as a function of speed 85th
Percentile
Speed
(mph)
Minimum
Sight
Distance
(ft)
20 175
25 215
30 270
35 325
40 390
45 460
50 540
55 625
60 715

8. Emergency Services & Response:
17 | P a g e
a. The contractor shall be required to provide emergency response with a 3-4 person crew for hanging limbs, hazardous, wind damaged or downed trees. This may include day, night, weekends, holidays and during storms. The contractor will be given specific locations and the work to be done at each location via telephone from a City authorized representative. The contractor shall be required to start the work indicated within sixty (60) minutes of the initial phone call and report back to the City representative upon completion of the work specified. Before and after pictures for documentation shall be taken by the contractor.
b. The contractor is required to provide a 24 hour emergency phone number and names of two (2) contact individuals within one (1) week of contract award. Should the phone number or contact person change during the course of the contract the contractor is required to inform the City immediately.
c. The contractor shall be required to provide all traffic control required during emergency response operations. Staff that performs traffic control operations must be traffic control certified. No work shall be performed on trees affected by high voltage lines. Should the work involve high voltage lines the contractor shall be required to notify the responsible utility company to shut down the line or take any other necessary actions to allow work to be performed safely.

9. Removal of Stumps and Stump Grinding:
a. All stumps must be removed to at least eighteen inches (18”) below the lowest soil level adjacent to the stump or until deep roots are no longer encountered. The contractor shall grind the stump to a minimum of five feet (5’) either side or five feet (5’) radius of the outer circumference of the stump and grind until no surface roots are longer encountered.
b. All tree stumps shall be measured four inches (4”) above finish grade level to determine its size.
c. Stumps should be cut low enough to the ground where grinding can be performed safely. No stumps shall be higher than four (4”) inches. d. Existing stumps need to be marked immediately after tree removal with orange cones and yellow caution tape until the stumps have been completely removed and backfilled to prevent tripping hazards.
e. All stump grinding locations shall be called in to the Underground Service Alert (USA) for locating underground utilities. The locations shall have cleared by USA prior to stump grinding.
f. Stump grinding needs to be performed within 10 business days of UAA clearance. g. All stumps shall be backfilled and compacted with premium screened topsoil, two inches (2”) above grade to prevent settling.
h. No stump grinding debris such as shavings or wood fibers shall remain on site. The stump grinding debris shall not be used to backfill the grinding hole.

10. Tree Planting & Planting stock:
a. Tree planting and planting stock shall be performed according to the current City of Roseville Parks, Recreation & Libraries Parks Design & Construction. b. All planted trees shall be watered in after planting.

D. Standard Requirements: section 11-15:

11. Traffic Control:
18 | P a g e
a. All Tree Pruning, Tree Maintenance and emergency response work shall include proper Traffic Control which shall conform to the California MUTCD 2010 Edition. b. A written Traffic Control Plan (TCP) shall be submitted to the City’s Traffic Engineering Department for approval seven (7) days prior to starting work. c. Only after the TCP has been approved and stamped by the City’s Traffic Engineer traffic control can be set up.

12. Resident Notification:
a. No parking signs shall be posted at least 2 days in advance to assure that no cars are blocking access to trees that need to be pruned.
b. Residents must be informed via door knocker at least 14 days in advance that routine cycle pruning, grid pruning will take place.
c. Residents must be informed via doorknocker for specialty pruning or tree removal at least 48hrs prior to work performed.
d. If a tree is getting skipped for pruning due to parked cars the contractor shall come back at a later time when no car is parked there and prune the tree at unit price. e. Contractor must use City of Roseville door knocker template and content.

13. Tree stake and tree tie removal and repair:
a. The contractor shall be required to remove tree stakes and tree ties that are no longer needed for support or replace broken tree stakes and tree ties during routine cycle or specialty pruning.
b. Stakes and tie replacement shall be replaced according to current City of Roseville Parks, Recreation & Libraries Parks Design & Construction.

14. Wood chips/throughput tracking:
a. Contractor shall be required to track on a daily basis the amount of wood chips generated (throughput through chipper) by quantity in cubic yards and location.

15. Tree Removal/Before and After Pictures:
a. Contractor shall be required to take before and after pictures for public justification. The before pictures should show the entire tree and the specific defect(s). b. When the tree has been removed the branch, trunk or decay pocket with the defect shall be dissected/sliced open and pictures shall be taken depicting the cross section of the defect (after pictures).
c. The contractor shall attach the before and after picture to the specific tree ID number and update the history in the asset management software. [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D003\P005\00071051.DOCX; 11/17/2022] EXHIBIT “C”
Pricing

CAGWIN & DORWARD EXHIBIT C
Cost Proposal Bid Sheet--On Demand/Extra Work
Provide costs for on demand or extra work per category and unit below.

October 4, 2022
Labor Unit Hourly Rate
Common labor Hour $50.00
Skilled Technician - Irrigation Technician Hour $70.00
Skilled Technician - Pesticide Applicator Hour $ 75.00
Field Supervisor Hour $ 70.00
Emergency/Off Hour Response Hour $ 70.00
Other (describe)
Extra Work - Agronomics (Labor & Equipment Only) Unit Unit Cost Fertilization - Parks Hour $50.00
Fertilization - Streetscapes Hour $50.00
Chemical Application - Parks Hour $ 100.00
Chemical Application - Streetscapes Hour
Hour
$100.00
Core Aerification and Clean-up - Parks $ 50.00
Core Aerification and Clean-up - Streetscapes Hour $ 50.00 Solid Tine Aerification Hour $ 50.00
Other {describe)
Extra Work - Planting (Labor & Equipment Only) Unit Unit Cost Tree planting - 24" box w/ staking Each $490.00
Tree planting - 15 gal w/ staking Each $150.00
Shrub planting - Sgallon Each $40.00
Shrub Planting - 1 gallon Each $16.00
Seasonal Color - 4" pot, per 16 ct. flat Each $36.00
Sod{Removal, preparation, installation) Sq. Ft. $2.00
Mulch installation - small areas {up to 10 CY) CY $ 120.00 Mulch installation - large areas (over 10 CY) CY $ 100.00 Other (describe)
Extra Work - Weed Abatement Unit Unit Cost
Disking Hour
Hour
$ 150.00
Rough Mowing $ 125.00
Hand Work / String line Trimmer Hour $ 50.00
Herbicide Application (Labor & Equipment Only) Hour $100.00 Other ( describe)
Materials Unit Mark-Up%
Provide Materials at Cost + % (Mark-up after any applicable tax) Percent 15% Facility Grounds--Bid at Standard Service Level.

Provide base cost for maintenance as outlined on the corresponding maps in Attachment J.

Please refer to the Parks & Landscape Service Levelsl (Exhibit B) for details.

Address Linear Feet of
Turf Linear Feet of Landscaping Square Footage of Turf
Square Footage of
Landscaping
Annual Cost Weed Free
Area Linear
Weed Free Area
Sq Ft
GF - Facilities
316 Vernon St 316 Vernon St 0 842 0 2,163 $2,251.91
Central (Shellito) Pool 10210 Fairway Dr. $15,954.49
Carnegie Museum 557 Lincoln St 273 702 1,878 4,602 $1,365.08 Civic Center 311 Vernon St 0 1,407 0 9,164 $3,179.92
Corporation Yard 2005 Hilltop Cir 1,534 13,955 38,247 197,749 $18,965.13 Downtown Library 225 Taylor St 0 1,853 0 14,484 $4,605.18 Johnson Pool 100 D St 664 685 3,677 2,630 $2,533.80
Roseville Police Department 1051 Junction Bl 787 6,099 3,437 49,264 $10,922.79 U.S. Post Office 320 Vernon St 0 437 0 2,354 $1,913.02
$61,691.33
Non-PRL
116 S Grant 116 S Grant St 0 683 0 1,621 $1,824.00
Barton Water Treatment Plant 9595 Barton Rd, Granite Bay 1,606 7,711 20,154 77,467 $15,564.00 9,327 117,154 Dry Creek Waster Water Treatment Plant 1800 Booth Rd 4,364 6,767 138,811 37,369 $30,600.00 15,792 284,725 Roseville Electric 2090 Hilltop Cir 0 3,452 0 33,172 $10,296.00 Pleasant Grove Waste Water Treatment Plant 5051 Westpark 0 24,424 0 378,558 $29,160.00 28,702 3,168,810 EU Weed Abatement $10,210.00
Blue Oaks Well #12 $1,980.00
Pleasant Grove Pump Station $1,152.00
Stoneridge Water Storage $2,136.00
Park Substation $3,540.00
Vernon St Substation $1,476.00
Bakkie Substation $2,820.00
Southeast Substation $1,548.00
Westplan Substation $2,400.00
Baseline Substation $1,728.00
Hardrock Substation $2,724.00
Fiddyment Receiving $4,160.00
$123,318.00
Woodcreek Golf Course Parking Lot 5880 Woodcreek Oaks Blvd $8,004.00 Louis Orlando Bus Transfer Station 110 Louis Ln 0 2,263 0 7,922 $3,542.04 Oak St. Parking Garage 116 S Grant St 0 683 0 1,620 $2,752.34 Vernon Street Parking Garage 405 Vernon St 0 702 0 2,319 $630.28 $14,928.66
GF-Fire Stations
Fire Station # 1 80 Lincoln St 0 2,389 0 18,548 $4,951.08 Cost Proposal Bid Sheet--Routine Work
Address Linear Feet of
Turf Linear Feet of Landscaping Square Footage of Turf
Square Footage of
Landscaping
Annual Cost Weed Free
Area Linear
Weed Free Area
Sq Ft
Fire Station # 2 1398 Junction Bl 497 326 2,567 1,224 $2,811.46 Fire Station # 3 1300 Cirby Wy 310 234 2,874 1,405 $2,094.61 Fire Station # 4 1900 Eureka Rd0 2,3480 20,066 $4,074.14 Fire Station #5 1565 Pleasant Grove Blvd 452 665 4,292 2,970 $4,761.43 Fire Station # 6 1430 E Roseville Pkwy0 1,4680 14,759 $2,603.48 Fire Station # 7 911 Highland Pointe Dr 1,576 2,112 34,645 33,770 $4,872.29 Fire Station # 9 2451 Hayden Pkwy0 3,0590 62,953 $4,611.52 $30,780.00
TOTALS 12,064 85,264 250,581 978,155 $107,400.00
Parks
Provide base cost for all parks listed. Base cost includes mowing, edging and blowing. Please refer to the City of Roseville Parks & Landscape Service Levels (Exhibit B) for details.

Additionally, provide add alternative costs for each column per the description below and refer to the Parks & Landscape Service Levels as needed.

Add Alternative #1: Pruning shall include shearing shrub hedges along walls, tree limb pruning to ensure 10' height clearance over sidewalks and 14' height over roads, and trimming of groundcover at hardscape edges.

Add Alternative #2: Irrigation shall include rotuine irrigation checks and schedule adjustments.

Add Alternative #3: Portering shall include trash pick up, blowing leaves off of hard surfaces, raking play areas, etc.

Parks Address Linear Feet Turf Linear Feet Landscaping Square Footage of Turf Bermuda Square Footage of Landscaping Base Cost AA- 1: Pruning AA-2: Irrigation TOTAL Crocker Ranch (2108)
Hamel Park 10080 Crocker Ranch Rd 3,717.7 4,109.6 262,360 96,092 $22,836.00 $22,836.00
Fiddyment (2111)
Bos Park 2323 Cumberland Dr. 32,308 13,993 $10,261.89
Burner Park 2196 Eastwood Dr 1,526.3 3,409.6 65,446 24,638 $15,056.05 Fiddyment Park 1200 Makeway St 975.1 2,005.0 26,556 16,901 $10,156.32 Fratis Park 2400 Corin Dr 5,394.8 2,280.0 185,928 18,483 $25,410.85 Gray Park 2565 Provincetown Way 32,184 22,908 $11,000.92 Harrigan Greens Park 4051 Parkland Wy 858.4 2,410.7 34,056 36,083 $11,328.20 Heredia Park 2201 Spring Grove Dr 3,231.4 1,280.9 88,950 11,459 $12,963.55 North Hayden Park 3200 Adelaide Lp 22,344 12,190 $7,972.20 RG Phillips Park 1200 Old Coach Dr 102,766 95,755 $30,172.29 Sakamoto Park 8160 Challis Circle 13,864 28,756 $8,544.00 Stizzo 4141 Brick Mason Ci 208,018 122,768 $14,273.74
$157,140.00
General Fund (1001)
Baquera Park 100 Painted Desert Ct 1,971.0 2,754.1 43,077 43,493 $14,972.00 Bear Dog Park 1565 Pleasant Grove Blvd 30,133 38,525 0
Besana Park 1061 Trehowell Dr 2,625.5 3,330.4 132,417 41,751 $13,849.00 Blue Oaks Park 8001 Woodcreek Oaks Bl 1,799.6 602.9 63,305 3,101 $8,856.00 Brown Park 260 Trestle Rd 4,493.9 2,620.5 195,497 26,257 $16,128.00 Buljan Park 150 Hallissy Dr 5,741.5 2,052.4 239,226 19,409 $16,790.00 Cambria Park 1781 Poppy Field Dr 4,732.1 94.7 98,647 584 $13,392.00 Central Park 10200 Fairway Dr 4,880.7 50,493 133,623 118,568 $34,131.00 Crabb Park 1000 Scarborough Dr 2,248.8 9,819.9 50,846 294,016 197,332 $30,498.00 Crestmont Park 1500 Champion Oaks Dr 3,444.8 2,617.9 139,497 32,182 $12,599.00 Davis Park 1460 Northpark Dr 3,541.3 2,169.9 125,366 17,272 $16,018.00 Diamond Oaks Park 400 Diamond Oaks Rd 8,023.3 3,706.5 173,319 59,926 $21,509.00 Parks Address Linear Feet Turf Linear Feet Landscaping Square Footage of Turf Bermuda Square Footage of Landscaping Base Cost AA- 1: Pruning AA-2: Irrigation TOTAL Dietrich Park 1201 Stoney Point Dr 1,704.6 522.8 43,744 5,978 $3,732.00 Doyle Park 1701 Calle Campana 3,724.5 2,893.0 131,330 20,898 $17,560.00 Duran Park 944 Pleasant Grove Bl 973.3 3,981.2 33,008 35,846 $11,982.00 Eastwood Park 950 Madden Ln 2,673.9 1,060.4 77,193 13,710 $13,754.00 Elliott Park 1421 Cushendall Dr 5,207.8 2,789.9 270,400 30,281 $20,910.00 Ferretti Park 601 Circuit Dr 663.2 35.7 5,179 71 $3,402.00 Garbolino Park 1015 Camelia Av 5,353.0 0.0 123,746 0 $14,326.00 Goto Park 1851 Oak Crest Dr 1,520.8 4,463.5 62,394 159,554 $22,064.00 Hall Park 1411 Raeburn Wy 3,096.3 3,339.0 79,474 88,836 $27,936.00 Hillsborough Park 1001 Hillsborough Dr 6,712.6 5,326.8 223,420 78,135 $22,360.00 Hughes Park 1600 Parkside Way 8,180.7 3,941.6 391,240 19,326 $24,900.00 Kaseberg Park 1151 Rand Wy 8,342.1 2,299.9 507,292 20,908 $31,688.00 Kenwood Oaks Park 1022 Tanzania Dr 565.6 1,054.6 5,788 28,101 $4,263.00 Lincoln Estates Park 331 James Dr 1,991.0 645.6 97,905 7,451 $12,734.00 Lockridge Park 2601 Eureka Rd 4,974.1 1,029.3 147,859 25,794 $13,572.00 Lunardi Park 2501 Country Club Dr 746.2 4,015.7 16,167 64,068 $18,755.00 Mahany Park 1545 Pleasant Grove Blvd 566,223 217,799 $54,305.00 Maidu Regional Park 1550 Maidu Dr 1,323,162 391,456 $47,545.00 Marco Dog Park 1800 Sierra Gardens Dr 1,231.1 0.0 52,703 0 $2,709.00 Misty Wood Park 1501 Misty Wood Dr 1,117.1 1,864.1 43,136 23,623 $12,740.00 Nelson Park 1213 S Bluff Wy 1,637.1 1,467.9 9,240 35,995 $12,248.00 Olympus Park 2551 La Croix Dr 3,461.4 3,834.4 225,895 60,738 $19,716.00 Pistachio Park 4350 Westpark Drive 36,146 229,468 52,984 $11,463.00 Royer Park 190 Park Dr 245,330 24,629 $33,089.00
Santucci Park 1831 Morningstar Dr 10,440.6 2,988.1 394,019 22,837 $25,543.00 Saugstad Park 100 Buljan Dr 381,940 3,984 $34,707.00
Silverado Oaks Park 1430 Badovinac Dr 6,091.8 2,613.3 209,813 30,896 $21,275.00 SSP48 2232 Dorrington Dr 0 16,326 $4,211.00
Summerhill Park 648 Grenada Pass Dr 2,816.0 1,450.8 76,957 25,412 $14,457.00 Sunrise Corridor 1100's Sunrise Bl 179,361 350,603 $23,919.00 Taylor Park 700 Parry St 492.6 1,814.0 13,344 18,110 $7,223.00 Twinwood Park 575 Twinwood Lp 2,943.0 1,162.1 27,884 4,320 $7,872.00 Uribe Park 3051 Empingham Wy 3,359.4 2,560.1 111,181 41,597 $19,900.00 Vernon Street Town Square 311 Vernon St 415.8 2,510.3 4,247 11,028 $6,754.00 Veteran's Memorial Park 1750 Blue Oaks Bl 1,731.9 3,220.6 60,087 39,697 $13,231.00 Veteran's Memorial Park North 10021 Crocker Ranch Rd 4,503.4 1,484.6 339,687 8,952 $23,970.00 Wallace Park (at Cresthaven) 401 Community Dr 4,086.7 1,867.7 99,681 21,054 $17,934.00 Waltrip Park 3800 Miners Ravine 1,467.7 2,899.8 31,088 16,130 $8,924.00 Wanish Park 1351 Junction Bl 3,989.7 4,094.6 206,353 51,653 $17,179.00 Parks Address Linear Feet Turf Linear Feet Landscaping Square Footage of Turf Bermuda Square Footage of Landscaping Base Cost AA- 1: Pruning AA-2: Irrigation TOTAL Weber Park 320 Circuit Dr 1,543.2 1,740.5 54,438 9,012 $10,476.00 White Park 504 Sixth St 458.0 1,625.9 7,457 6,836 $2,078.00 Woodbridge Park 415 Sierra Bl 3,276.8 720.4 87,586 2,953 $5,235.00 $921,383.00
Highland Reserve (2107)
Erven Park 6201 Grand Canyon Dr 1,730.0 2,155.1 39,978 12,640 $10,255.68 Pineschi Park 9501 Highland Park Dr 4,956.4 3,110.4 125,474 31,474 $19,987.46 Stephenson Park 6665 Maple Creek Dr 2,217.0 2,845.6 80,230 18,955 $16,112.86 $46,356.00
Longmeadow (2114)
Rickey Park 1475 Parkside Wy 3,639.8 2,704.6 67,819 43,363 $17,285.79 $17,280.00
Olympus (2006)
Sculpture Park 350 N Sunrise Av 312.0 0.0 2,411 0 $4,958.86 $4,944.00
Stone Point #2 (2110)
Piches Park 1471 Stone Point Dr 178.5 2,031.3 1,958 10,414 $8,803.90 $8,796.00
Stone Point #4 (2117)
Kennedy Park 4025 Vittorio Dr 33,500 29,091 $11,844.46
$11,832.00
Westbrook (2119)
Sullivan Park 4000 Solaire Dr 110,383 57,202 $24,172.45 $24,180.00
Westpark (2113)
Astill Family Park 1401 Grand Junction Wy 767 29,459 $13,069.13 Festersen Park 2150 Villages Green Dr 2,892.2 3,596.9 240,206 54,975 $26,322.29 Luken Park 2350 Pleasant Grove Blvd 54,909 50,551 $18,104.00 Mahan Park 1095 Amington Dr 8,237.6 8,216.5 236,216 94,517 $30,141.66 Nichols Park 4525 Bob Doyle Dr 2,175.7 1,995.2 103,421 34,159 $12,805.19 Roccucci Park 2110 Symphony Ave 99,569 65,572 $24,573.64 Sierra Crossing Park 4251 Brookstone Dr 178,002 73,528 $26,400.08 $151,416.00
Woodcreek East (2109)
Dugan Park 1432 Diamond Woods Ci 5,329.9 4,202.3 138,092 15,658 $12,855.87 $12,864.00
TOTALS 202,368 153,441 10,958,645 0 10,958,645 $1,379,026.99 Schools
Provide cost for mowing only 1x a week.

Refer to the City of Roseville Parks & Landscape Service Levels (Exhibit B) and maps in Attachment J for details.

Add Alternative #1: Provide add alternative costs to perform irrigation work at three school sites noted.

Irrigation work includes programming 2x/week and systems check 1x/week Address Square Footage of
Turf Annual Cost AA-1: Irrigation
Schools
Buljan Middle School 100 Hallissy Dr 239,700 $7,330.07
Chilton Middle School 4501 Bob Doyle DR 290,140 $8,984.43 Cirby Elementary 814 Darling Wy 47,537 $3,687.73
Cooley Middle School 9300 Prairie Woods Wy 363,838 $11,117.05 Diamond Creek Elementary 3151 Hopscotch Wy 33,915 $3,376.29 Eich Intermediate 1509 Sierra Gardens Dr 223,500 $6,916.22 Heritage Oaks Elementary 2271 Americana Dr 138,206 $7,005.96 Junction Elementary 2150 Ellison Dr 91,363 $5,471.95
Olympus Junior High School 2625 La Croix Dr 82,121 $5,308.31 Orchard Ranch Middle School 4375 Brookstone Dr 30,050 $2,906.48 Quail Glen Elementary 1250 Canevari Dr 119,293 $6,247.93 Riego Creek Elementary 3255 Pruett Dr. $5,726.39
Sargeant Elementary 1200 Ridgecrest Wy 172,391 $5,884.75 Spanger Elementary 699 Shasta St 81,917 $5,132.00
Stoneridge Elementary 2501 Alexandra Dr 244,653 $7,667.91 Thomas Jefferson Elementary 750 Central Park Dr 106,511 $4,779.06 Woodbridge Elementary 515 Niles St 52,527 $4,061.47
$101,604.00
Eureka Schools
Excelsior Elementary 2701 Eureka Rd. $17,052.00
Maidu Elementary 1950 Johnson Ranch Dr. $18,444.00
Olympus Junior High School 2625 La Croix Dr. $17,856.00 $53,352.00
TOTALS 2,317,662.2 $154,956.00
Cost Proposal Bid Sheet--Routine Work
Streetscapes--Bid according to Service Level assigned.

Provide the base cost for streetscapes. Base cost shall include mowing, blowing, edging, pruning, irrigation and litter removal.

Please refer to the Parks & Landscape Service Levels (Exhibit B) for details on service level assigned and Attachment J for all maps.

Streetscape District and Map Linear Feet of
Turf
Linear Feet of
Landscaping
Square Footage
of Turf
Square Footage of
Landscaping Service Level Annual Cost
2006-Map-01 398.1 2,647.1 5,092.0 17,087.9 Standard $4,111.09 2006-Map-02 0.0 4,961.4 0.0 36,292.1 Standard $5,834.07 2006-Map-03 28.8 1,394.3 1,577.4 17,096.0 Standard $3,178.84 2006-Map-04 0.0 4,569.1 0.0 24,744.6 Standard $3,978.07 2006-Map-05 0.0 2,671.5 0.0 14,919.5 Standard $2,398.66 2006-Map-06 0.0 5,058.7 0.0 29,485.6 Standard $4,739.26 TOTAL 426.9 21,302.1 6,669.4 139,625.7 $24,240.00
2007-Map-01 521.7 477.7 37,525.6 65,848.8 Standard $20,637.80 2007-Map-02 2,080.2 3,609.3 14,267.1 47,862.2 Standard $11,522.20 TOTAL 2,601.9 4,087.0 51,792.7 113,711.0 $32,160.00
Streetscape District and Map Linear Feet of
Turf
Linear Feet of
Landscaping
Square Footage
of Turf
Square Footage of
Landscaping Service Level Annual Cost
2008-Map-01 1,191.5 1,827.3 7,927.5 17,543.6 Core $3,285.49 2008-Map-02 818.2 1,796.4 9,840.5 33,863.0 Core $5,636.65 2008-Map-03 9,311.0 9,147.3 72,460.8 47,957.4 Core $6,011.74 2008-Map-04 891.3 10,181.0 41,767.9 126,752.5 Core $10,807.00 2008-Map-05 2,975.8 3,345.1 12,710.7 13,673.1 Core $2,210.00 2008-Map-06 3,690.7 4,686.0 20,310.2 48,972.5 Core $8,935.87 2008-Map-07 2,277.1 7,021.9 51,792.3 75,553.9 Core $16,425.36 2008-Map-08 3,427.2 13,157.5 35,753.4 86,176.3 Core $15,726.45 2008-Map-09 263.8 4,211.5 5,473.5 63,855.1 Core $8,942.20 2008-Map-10 1,683.1 3,274.8 32,074.4 33,974.6 Core $8,518.85 2008-Map-11 1,789.2 4,348.8 28,386.9 56,612.2 Core $10,962.91 2008-Map-12 2,674.6 11,169.1 50,525.5 97,308.9 Core $19,067.90 2008-Map-13 996.0 4,603.1 83,399.3 135,326.0 Core $27,861.24 2008-Map-14 413.9 6,003.0 5,177.3 34,101.3 Core $5,066.54 2008-Map-15 128.8 6,543.2 8,609.6 99,167.1 Core $13,857.77 2008-Map-16 0.0 3,139.7 0.0 39,740.8 Core $5,125.67
2008-Map-17 0.0 965.8 0.0 22,693.1 Core $2,926.54
Cost Proposal Bid Sheet--Routine Work
2006 Olympus Pointe -Zone A LLD
2007 Olympus Pointe -Zone D LLD
2008 Northwest Zone A
2008-Map-18 0.0 614.1 0.0 4,244.8 Core $547.93
2008-Map-19 0.0 497.6 0.0 6,062.6 Core $782.31
2008-Map-20 0.0 177.5 0.0 1,890.7 Core $243.88
2008-Map-21 1,054.6 6,698.9 10,138.5 78,838.3 Core $11,476.00 2008-Map-22 0.0 676.0 0.0 9,155.6 Core $1,181.38
2008-Map-23 0.0 148.0 0.0 947.8 Core $122.47
2008-Map-24 0.0 273.5 0.0 2,620.7 Core $337.84
TOTAL 33,586.8 104,507.1 476,348.3 1,137,031.9 $186,060.00 2009-Map-01 1,524.8 1,973.2 14,136.7 25,614.6 Core $6,065.00 2009-Map-02 0.0 3,428.8 0.0 32,621.3 Core $4,015.00
TOTAL 1,524.8 5,402.0 14,136.7 58,235.9 $10,080.00
Streetscape District and Map Linear Feet of
Turf
Linear Feet of
Landscaping
Square Footage
of Turf
Square Footage of
Landscaping Service Level Annual Cost
2010-Map-01 4,801.7 9,193.9 54,350.8 83,587.2 Standard $30,528.00 2010-Map-02 3,496.0 6,378.6 119,697.1 123,132.8 Standard $49,120.00 2010-Map-03 418.5 1,064.8 42,602.7 58,633.1 Standard $19,738.00 2010-Map-04 1,390.3 9,426.3 41,017.1 74,485.0 Standard $21,748.00 2010-Map-05 551.5 1,146.2 3,700.5 9,460.5 Standard $6,758.00 2010-Map-06 2,668.7 9,250.3 28,608.0 77,783.4 Standard $19,101.00 2010-Map-07 2,096.4 8,894.7 46,642.2 111,717.0 Standard $29,352.00 2010-Map-08 0.0 6,463.8 0.0 41,348.8 Standard $6,295.00 TOTAL 15,423.1 51,818.6 336,618.4 580,147.8 $182,640.00 2011-Map-01 0.0 6,267.3 0.0 97,605.3 Standard $1,199.18 2011-Map-02 2,813.9 4,103.9 30,794.4 20,717.5 Standard $11,579.47 2011-Map-03 3,486.5 3,212.0 15,913.9 23,471.7 Standard $8,035.31 2011-Map-04 2,332.5 3,844.2 27,138.9 31,920.5 Standard $12,401.90 2011-Map-05 2,005.0 3,301.0 12,123.0 21,315.0 Standard $6,673.40 2011-Map-06 4,609.5 4,379.3 24,873.9 29,206.5 Standard $11,358.81 2011-Map-07 1,148.1 1,335.8 3,814.5 41,488.7 Standard $7,691.14 2011-Map-08 0.0 470.5 0.0 5,352.6 Standard $860.44
2011-Map-09 0.0 211.4 0.0 1,574.4 Standard $253.38
2011-Map-10 991.8 0.0 27,708.5 0.0 Standard $7,422.98
TOTAL 17,387.3 27,125.4 142,367.1 272,652.2 $67,476.00
2012-Map-01 366.3 848.1 27,908.8 23,814.0 Standard $11,303.92 2012-Map-02 863.9 2,521.6 7,510.6 12,287.9 Standard $3,936.08 TOTAL 1,230.2 3,369.7 35,419.4 36,101.9 $15,240.00
2013-Map-01 1,281.7 2,909.3 5,752.2 14,857.8 Standard $3,924.00 2009 Northwest Zone B
2010 North Central District Wide Zone
2011 North Central-Local Benefit Zone
2012 North Central Zone F (Diamond Oaks 10) LLD
2013 North Central Zone G (Diamond Oaks 10) LLD
TOTAL 1,281.7 2,909.3 5,752.2 14,857.8 $3,924.00
Streetscape District and Map Linear Feet of
Turf
Linear Feet of
Landscaping
Square Footage
of Turf
Square Footage of
Landscaping Service Level Annual Cost
2014-Map-01 0.0 1,792.5 0.0 8,591.9 Standard $1,380.00
TOTAL 0.0 1,792.5 0.0 8,591.9 $1,380.00
2015-Map-01 2,153.9 1,057.1 6,482.7 1,781.6 Standard $2,004.00 TOTAL 2,153.9 1,057.1 6,482.7 1,781.6 $2,004.00
2017-Map-01 0.0 1,524.4 0.0 24,773.8 Standard $3,996.00 TOTAL 0.0 1,524.4 0.0 24,773.8 $3,996.00
Streetscape District and Map Linear Feet of
Turf
Linear Feet of
Landscaping
Square Footage
of Turf
Square Footage of
Landscaping Service Level Annual Cost
2102-Map-01 3,781.5 3,548.0 19,502.5 19,178.4 Standard $8,072.26 2102-Map-02 608.1 3,179.6 15,169.3 19,548.6 Standard $7,167.74 TOTAL 4,389.6 6,727.6 34,671.8 38,727.0 $15,240.00
2103-Map-01 4,264.0 4,505.3 18,150.3 52,083.2 Standard $13,038.51 2103-Map-02 462.3 3,694.0 7,641.1 38,753.3 Standard $8,153.56 2103-Map-03 808.3 1,912.1 2,769.2 14,259.2 Standard $2,988.83 2103-Map-04 378.3 5,017.0 2,661.2 29,001.8 Standard $659.10 TOTAL 5,912.9 15,128.4 31,221.8 134,098.0 $24,840.00
2103-Map-01 2,134.0 7,011.0 18,608.2 55,412.4 Standard $15,019.36 2103-Map-02 823.7 5,806.3 20,424.1 42,183.5 Standard $12,519.43 2103-Map-03 1,097.8 8,367.6 16,070.9 199,035.7 Standard $35,761.42 2103-Map-04 3,580.8 7,515.6 15,089.3 41,910.1 Standard $10,619.79 TOTAL 7,636.3 28,700.5 70,192.5 338,541.7 $73,920.00
2118 North Roseville Zone E
2118-Map-01 0.0 5,108.1 0.0 11,594.0 $3,760.00
2118-Map-02 130.3 1,492.7 1,230.5 8,879.6 $3,584.00
TOTAL 130.3 6,600.8 6,731.1 20,473.6 $7,344.00
Streetscape District and Map Linear Feet of
Turf
Linear Feet of
Landscaping
Square Footage
of Turf
Square Footage of
Landscaping Service Level
2014 Infill Zone A (Pheasant Run) LLD
2017 Infill Zone C (Reuter Ranch) LLD
2102 North Roseville Zone B
2103 North Roseville Zone C
2103 North Roseville Zone D
2021 Historic District LLD
2015 Infill Zone B (Cirby Oaks II) LLD
2021-Map-01 0.0 5,441.6 0.0 32,261.3 Standard $13,056.00 TOTAL 0.0 5,441.6 0.0 32,261.3 $13,056.00
Streetscape District and Map Linear Feet of
Turf
Linear Feet of
Landscaping
Square Footage
of Turf
Square Footage of
Landscaping Service Level
2023-Map-01 0.0 509.7 0.0 8,424.0 Standard $3,101.79
2023-Map-02 0.0 541.3 0.0 6,194.7 Standard $2,281.48
2023-Map-03 0.0 2,417.2 0.0 6,123.6 Standard $2,260.73
TOTAL 0.0 3,468.2 0.0 20,742.3 $7,644.00
Streetscape District and Map Linear Feet of
Turf
Linear Feet of
Landscaping
Square Footage
of Turf
Square Footage of
Landscaping Service Level Annual Cost
2119-Map-01 2,161.4 22,084.4 8,364.7 124,718.4 Standard $30,616.75 2119-Map-02 0.0 15,184.8 0.0 167,852.0 Standard $40,839.44 2119-Map-03 0.0 11,368.9 0.0 94,550.6 Standard $23,727.00 2119-Map-04 0.0 5,376.3 0.0 37,048.8 Standard $9,242.04 2119-Map-05 0.0 13,689.7 0.0 127,615.0 Standard $31,066.78 2119-Map-06 0.0 9,017.8 0.0 44,249.2 Standard $10,379.08 2119-Map-07 0.0 7,904.0 0.0 63,691.9 Standard $13,700.00 2119-Map-08 0.0 6,545.0 0.0 41,419.0 Standard $8,961.00 2119-Map-09 0.0 8,085.0 0.0 64,027.0 Standard $13,867.92 TOTAL 2,161.4 99,255.9 8,364.7 765,171.9 $182,400.00
Streetscape District and Map Linear Feet of
Turf
Linear Feet of
Landscaping
Square Footage
of Turf
Square Footage of
Landscaping Service Level
2104-Map-01 843.5 6,414.5 4,594.0 103,120.8 Standard $21,812.85 2104-Map-02 1,466.9 7,165.8 25,453.2 63,564.5 Standard $20,869.01 2104-Map-03 1,385.9 4,483.9 7,472.9 30,683.9 Standard $8,494.56 2104-Map-04 340.3 8,699.9 20,224.7 132,137.2 Standard $32,655.40 2104-Map-05 1,389.2 19,517.8 11,193.6 155,219.2 Standard $34,573.70 2104-Map-06 790.7 7,848.5 4,603.6 63,912.2 Standard $28,012.35 2104-Map-07 0.0 547.8 0.0 2,686.8 Standard $528.93
2104-Map-08 1,037.2 5,296.1 38,632.0 76,567.2 Standard $27,754.61 2104-Map-09 597.0 3,379.8 6,543.3 29,362.1 Standard $7,928.68 2104-Map-10 0.0 567.7 0.0 20,259.3 Standard $8,110.60
2104-Map-11 0.0 11,341.3 0.0 95,432.0 Standard $18,791.29 TOTAL 7,850.7 75,263.1 118,717.3 772,945.2 $209,532.00
2023 Riverside LLD
2119 Westbrook
2104 Stoneridge CFD
Streetscape District and Map Linear Feet of
Turf
Linear Feet of
Landscaping
Square Footage
of Turf
Square Footage of
Landscaping Service Level
2105-Map-01 4,558.0 3,229.9 32,224.3 38,451.2 Standard $9,468.00 TOTAL 4,558.0 3,229.9 32,224.3 38,451.2 $9,468.00
Streetscape District and Map Linear Feet of
Turf
Linear Feet of
Landscaping
Square Footage
of Turf
Square Footage of
Landscaping Service Level Annual Cost
2106-Map-01 3,219.5 4,896.6 115,722.7 69,925.0 Standard $35,682.24 2106-Map-02 4,909.4 4,242.3 208,754.2 48,674.0 Standard $40,884.62 2106-Map-03 970.7 3,742.6 16,432.0 25,157.0 Standard $8,191.56 2106-Map-04 1,115.4 3,882.5 15,647.0 40,281.0 Standard $12,851.00 2106-Map-05 2,258.7 6,931.9 33,458.0 41,490.0 Standard $13,620.00 2106-Map-06 2,683.7 6,917.1 16,842.8 52,079.0 Standard $13,415.00 2106-Map-07 3,539.8 7,988.8 28,435.6 34,799.8 Standard $13,243.00 2106-Map-08 676.9 5,302.2 35,835.4 33,777.9 Standard $13,707.86 2106-Map-09 0.0 1,532.2 0.0 8,839.4 Standard $1,740.93
2106-Map-10 0.0 6,963.1 0.0 41,621.9 Standard $8,195.79 TOTAL 19,374.1 52,399.3 471,127.7 396,645.0 $161,532.00 Streetscape District and Map Linear Feet of
Turf
Linear Feet of
Landscaping
Square Footage
of Turf
Square Footage of
Landscaping Service Level Annual Cost
2108-Map-01 1,125.3 6,024.8 12,947.9 55,955.7 Standard $12,462.07 2108-Map-02 780.6 8,414.8 20,032.7 71,590.3 Standard $16,874.05 2108-Map-03 1,078.6 6,248.8 16,232.9 38,344.7 Standard $10,512.10 2108-Map-04 983.3 4,886.6 19,373.2 27,161.4 Standard $9,555.59 2108-Map-05 1,948.2 5,641.9 16,832.5 34,476.3 Standard $10,044.18 TOTAL 5,916.0 31,216.9 85,419.2 227,528.4 $59,448.00
Streetscape District and Map Linear Feet of
Turf
Linear Feet of
Landscaping
Square Footage
of Turf
Square Footage of
Landscaping Service Level
2107-Map-01 143.5 10,339.0 5,892.5 99,170.1 Standard $17,519.12 2107-Map-02 814.0 12,574.1 17,923.6 136,217.1 Standard $26,697.81 2107-Map-03 1,601.3 6,202.4 26,358.4 85,838.5 Standard $20,857.07 2107 Highland Reserve North
2105 Stoneridge Parcel 1 CFD
2106 Woodcreek West
2108 Crocker Ranch
2107-Map-04 1,785.8 12,589.6 14,524.0 129,891.4 Standard $24,770.01 TOTAL 4,344.6 41,705.1 64,698.5 451,117.1 $89,844.00
Streetscape District and Map Linear Feet of
Turf
Linear Feet of
Landscaping
Square Footage
of Turf
Square Footage of
Landscaping Service Level $5,125.67
2019 Vernon Infill
2019-Map-01 0.0 4,923.2 0.0 9,711.3 Standard $5,016.00
TOTAL 0.0 4,923.2 0.0 9,711.3 $5,016.00
Streetscape District and Map Linear Feet of
Turf
Linear Feet of
Landscaping
Square Footage
of Turf
Square Footage of
Landscaping Service Level
2109-Map-01 4,113.0 10,112.9 161,753.4 129,916.8 Standard $48,000.00 TOTAL 4,113.0 10,112.9 161,753.4 129,916.8 $48,000.00
Streetscape District and Map Linear Feet of
Turf
Linear Feet of
Landscaping
Square Footage
of Turf
Square Footage of
Landscaping Service Level Annual Cost
2110-Map-01 298.7 1,362.4 1,768.2 10,579.5 Standard $2,724.00 TOTAL 298.7 1,362.4 1,768.2 10,579.5 $2,724.00
Streetscape District and Map Linear Feet of
Turf
Linear Feet of
Landscaping
Square Footage
of Turf
Square Footage of
Landscaping Service Level Annual Cost
2113-Map-01 195.6 6,721.0 34,692.5 169,194.0 Standard $49,621.31 2113-Map-02 4,322.0 9,576.4 64,145.0 136,641.6 Standard $53,236.19 2113-Map-03 1,442.2 9,841.5 27,236.2 132,036.0 Standard $15,000.00 2113-Map-04 719.1 6,530.7 10,259.2 78,127.6 Standard $20,815.17 2113-Map-05 2,675.4 6,739.8 31,179.3 50,565.9 Standard $22,412.52 2113-Map-06 4,312.3 8,026.1 17,620.5 46,256.2 Standard $17,007.22 2113-Map-07 594.1 9,136.6 10,354.4 77,282.1 Standard $20,665.25 2113-Map-08 2,012.0 5,065.0 14,860.7 36,315.8 Standard $13,352.07 2113-Map-09 4,676.5 18,456.9 43,975.6 216,151.6 Standard $52,111.00 2113-Map-10 0.0 3,876.7 0.0 32,911.0 Standard $7,193.88 2113-Map-11 466.4 9,022.0 15,937.6 122,101.1 Standard $32,495.99 2113-Map-12 4,728.8 27,283.9 23,047.6 286,544.7 Standard $60,194.41 2113-Map-13 0.0 4,113.8 0.0 37,078.3 Standard $8,003.00 TOTAL 26,144.4 124,390.4 293,308.6 1,421,205.9 $372,108.00 2109 Woodcreek East
2110 Stone Point CFD 2
2113 West Park
Streetscape District and Map Linear Feet of
Turf
Linear Feet of
Landscaping
Square Footage
of Turf
Square Footage of
Landscaping Service Level Annual Cost
2111-Map-01 1,017.7 2,441.5 38,273.2 35,299.2 Standard $18,397.50 2111-Map-02 1,867.2 2,269.5 56,958.2 76,946.6 Standard $32,238.38 2111-Map-03 7,062.6 12,148.3 98,019.7 156,110.7 Standard $51,900.00 2111-Map-04 2,787.5 2,770.9 24,197.4 20,977.7 Standard $11,410.55 2111-Map-05 1,198.6 16,903.4 15,032.3 131,740.9 Standard $30,256.74 2111-Map-06 2,491.4 20,237.7 54,445.7 151,928.9 Standard $39,300.00 2111-Map-07 0.0 19,875.5 0.0 131,551.0 Standard $28,137.00 2111-Map-08 862.3 14,393.9 55,655.5 143,547.9 Standard $37,077.00 2111-Map-09 765.7 4,986.6 47,660.5 67,469.4 Standard $25,154.30 2111-Map-10 914.3 17,965.0 6,418.1 116,747.9 Standard $24,727.78 2111-Map-11 0.0 8,299.3 0.0 157,510.8 Standard $34,300.00 2111-Map-12 0.0 13,723.1 0.0 83,973.5 Standard $18,236.90 2111-Map-13 529.8 11,399.2 3,296.8 69,968.2 Standard $13,355.95 2111-Map-14 0.0 4,473.1 0.0 22,301.7 Standard $4,567.17 2111-Map-15 0.0 7,084.0 0.0 29,212.2 Standard $7,304.73 2111-Map-16 0.0 11,743.3 0.0 61,087.2 Standard $12,877.00 2111-Map-17 0.0 9,163.0 0.0 55,253.0 Standard $12,032.00 2111-Map-18 0.0 13,524.2 0.0 59,085.4 Standard $12,243.00 2111-Map-19 0.0 12,061.4 0.0 61,895.7 Standard $12,930.00 2111-Map-20 0.0 2,585.1 0.0 26,164.0 Standard $8,398.00 TOTAL 19,497.1 212,547.5 399,957.4 1,678,415.0 $434,844.00 Streetscape District and Map Linear Feet of
Turf
Linear Feet of
Landscaping
Square Footage
of Turf
Square Footage of
Landscaping Service Level Annual Cost
2114-Map-01 211.2 4,909.0 10,665.6 62,154.6 Standard $12,848.48 2114-Map-02 898.9 7,926.1 5,536.0 75,642.7 Standard $13,635.52 TOTAL 1,110.1 12,835.1 16,201.6 137,797.3 $26,484.00
Streetscape District and Map Linear Feet of
Turf
Linear Feet of
Landscaping
Square Footage
of Turf
Square Footage of
Landscaping Service Level
2115-Map-01 (Rosepark ) 2,451.8 3,317.2 13,120.8 18,652.0 Standard $4,803.66 2115-Map-02 (Church ) 0.0 584.4 0.0 7,179.6 Standard $925.89 2115-Map-03 (Woodlake) 1,702.8 1,747.8 18,021.5 14,599.1 Standard $4,714.98 2115-Map-04 (American Dream) 0.0 4,305.3 0.0 21,972.9 Standard $5,861.52 2111 Fiddyment
2114 Longmeadow
2115 Infill 4
2115-Map-05 (Old Auburn Spahn Ranch) 0.0 1,920.8 0.0 17,261.0 Standard $2,437.94 TOTAL 4,154.6 11,875.5 31,142.3 79,664.6 $18,744.00
Streetscape District and Map Linear Feet of
Turf
Linear Feet of
Landscaping
Square Footage
of Turf
Square Footage of
Landscaping Service Level Annual Cost
2117-Map-01 0.0 2,989.9 0.0 27,742.9 Standard $6,888.00 TOTAL 0.0 2,989.9 0.0 27,742.9 $6,888.00
Streetscape District and Map Linear Feet of
Turf
Linear Feet of
Landscaping
Square Footage
of Turf
Square Footage of
Landscaping Service Level Annual Cost
1001/IV-Map-01 2,886.1 6,796.3 31,922.2 84,573.6 Standard $25,131.00 1001/IV-Map-02 0.0 435.0 0.0 2,134.1 Standard $343.00
1001/IV-Map-03 180.6 9,878.4 1,360.6 28,009.0 Standard $4,806.00 1001/IV-Map-04 0.0 8,187.4 0.0 248,077.7 Standard $46,847.00 1001/IV-Map-05 1,255.3 4,329.4 1,409.8 24,264.2 Standard $4,275.00 1001/IV-Map-06 0.0 3,450.7 0.0 18,279.7 Standard $2,936.00 1001/IV-Map-07 5,493.8 12,308.4 44,319.4 69,927.0 Standard $25,097.00 1001/IV-Map-08 0.0 4,040.8 0.0 25,697.3 Standard $4,213.00 1001/IV-Map-09 0.0 1,417.8 0.0 29,609.7 Standard $5,030.00 1001/IV-Map-10 0.0 1,867.9 0.0 42,813.6 Standard $6,877.00 1001/IV-Map-11 0.0 1,586.9 0.0 10,524.4 Standard $1,691.00 1001/IV-Map-12 0.0 3,011.5 0.0 24,566.1 Standard $3,946.00 1001/IV-Map-13 0.0 2,266.8 0.0 10,631.5 Standard $1,689.00 IV- SUBTOTAL 9,815.8 59,577.3 79,012.0 619,107.9
1001/NC-Map-01 690.3 352.3 5,976.8 13,464.6 Standard $3,946.00 1001/NC-Map-02 0.0 386.1 0.0 1,209.2 Standard $194.00
NC-SUBTOTAL 690.3 738.4 5,976.8 14,673.8
1001/NW-Map-01 0.0 139.0 0.0 786.3 Standard $223.00
1001/NW-Map-02 431.4 2,288.9 3,450.0 13,906.7 Standard $3,850.00 1001/NW-Map-03 437.9 297.1 2,450.8 4,135.1 Standard $1,340.00 1001/NW-Map-04 0.0 3,116.0 0.0 21,189.4 Standard $4,302.00 1001/NW-Map-05 1,278.8 4,581.1 12,673.1 33,326.3 Standard $9,340.00 1001/NW-Map-06 0.0 1,022.4 0.0 3,651.7 Standard $742.00 1001/NW-Map-07 0.0 4,675.5 0.0 27,416.0 Standard $5,566.00 NW- SUBTOTAL 2,148.1 16,120.0 18,573.9 104,411.5
TOTAL 12,654.2 76,435.6 103,562.7 738,193.2 $162,384.00 2117 Stone Point CFD 4
1001 General Fund
Streetscape District and Map Linear Feet of
Turf
Linear Feet of
Landscaping
Square Footage
of Turf
Square Footage of
Landscaping Service Level Annual Cost
2120-Map-01 0.0 6,980.6 0.0 72,618.7 Standard $19,066.85 2120-Map-02 0.0 3,867.7 0.0 26,908.0 Standard $4,928.00 2120-Map-03 0.0 3,342.1 0.0 22,160.9 Standard $4,654.00 2120-Map-04 0.0 5,062.1 0.0 23,570.2 Standard $4,749.00 2120-Map-05 0.0 3,743.9 0.0 18,931.4 Standard $4,000.00 2120-Map-06 0.0 3,574.6 0.0 9,850.7 Standard $1,794.15
2120-Map-08 0.0 1,488.4 0.0 7,914.0 $1,824.00
TOTAL 0.0 34,469.5 0.0 288,794.1 $41,016.00
Streetscape District and Map Linear Feet of
Turf
Linear Feet of
Landscaping
Square Footage
of Turf
Square Footage of
Landscaping Service Level $2,398.66
2121-Map-01 0.0 10,165.1 0.0 70,669.0 Standard $14,396.00 2121-Map-02 0.0 2,253.2 0.0 25,732.0 Standard $5,196.00 2121-Map-03 0.0 7,133.1 0.0 124,068.6 Standard $24,792.00 2121-Map-04 0.0 1,533.1 0.0 12,989.5 Standard $2,724.00 2121-Map-05 0.0 19,262.8 0.0 140,643.0 Standard $29,536.00 TOTAL 0.0 21,084.4 0.0 233,459.2 $76,644.00
Streetscape District and Map Linear Feet of
Turf
Linear Feet of
Landscaping
Square Footage
of Turf
Square Footage of
Landscaping Service Level Annual Cost
2122-Map-01 324.2 8,876.1 6,209.7 65,593.1 Standard $14,851.24 2122-Map-02 1,246.5 20,960.8 22,419.9 154,961.0 Standard $37,170.00 2122-Map-03 287.0 5,430.6 4,673.0 40,702.4 Standard $9,526.03 2122-Map-04 0.0 2,270.4 0.0 16,320.3 Standard $3,743.00 2122-Map-05 0.0 6,424.6 0.0 84,578.8 Standard $15,012.77 2122-Map-06 0.0 4,452.8 0.0 17,842.8 Standard $3,325.61 2122-Map-07 0.0 13,446.9 0.0 99,513.9 Standard $16,180.00 2122-Map-08 0.0 8,009.8 0.0 71,324.6 Standard $14,978.00 2122-Map-09 0.0 5,988.7 0.0 57,618.9 Standard $10,198.00 2122-Map-10 0.0 8,412.6 0.0 61,627.5 Standard $10,908.00 2122-Map-11 0.0 4,464.1 0.0 52,595.8 Standard $10,703.35 2122-Map-12 0.0 2,298.2 0.0 22,660.0 Standard $4,521.00 2122-Map-13 0.0 4,963.9 0.0 56,922.7 Standard $12,311.00 2122-Map-14 0.0 7,705.1 0.0 32,377.1 Standard $6,804.00 2122-Map-15 0.0 5,947.1 0.0 48,640.5 Standard $10,212.00 TOTALS 1,857.7 109,651.6 33,302.6 883,279.5 $180,444.00 2121 Creekview Village
2122 Sierra Vista
2120 Campus Oaks

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2404
File #: 0501
Title: 2022 Building Standards Code Adoption
Contact: Jason Rizzi 916-774-5802 [email protected] Jim Mangino 916-774-5390 [email protected]
Meeting Date: 12/7/2022
Item #: 6.28.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends adopting ORDINANCE NO. 6571 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AMENDING SECTION 16.04.100 OF CHAPTER 16.04, RE-ADOPTING AND AMENDING SECTION 16.04.310 OF CHAPTER 16.04, AND REPEALING SECTION

16.04.830 OF CHAPTER 16.04, AMENDING SECTIONS 16.16.020 OF CHAPTER 16.16, RE-ADOPTING SECTION 16.16.030 OF CHAPTER 16.16, AMENDING SECTIONS

16.16.040, 16.16.050, 16.16.060, 16.16.110 AND 16.16.130 OF CHAPTER 16.16 OF TITLE 16 OF THE ROSEVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION, for second reading and adoption. Staff further recommends the City Council adopt an urgency ordinance amending Title 16 of the Roseville Municipal Code, which prescribes regulations governing building standards and conditions hazardous to life and property, and declaring the ordinance to be effective December 7, 2022 as an urgency ordinance.

BACKGROUND
On November 2, 2022, the City Council introduced for first reading Ordinance No. 6571 amending Title 16 of the Roseville Municipal Code, which prescribes regulations governing building standards and conditions hazardous to life and property. The purpose of Ordinance No. 6571 is to adopt the 2022 California Building Standards Code contained within Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, which has an enforcement date of January 1, 2023. The introduction and first reading of Ordinance No. 6571 was approved by Council unanimously, and the ordinance was scheduled to return to Council for second reading and adoption at the November 16, 2022 City Council meeting, however, the November 16thmeeting was subsequently cancelled.

Pursuant to Health & Safety Code section 17958, the updated Building Standards Code becomes the City’s default rules for building matters on January 1, 2023. However, the City is permitted to adopt the Building Standards Code with the City’s own local amendments by adopting the Code and any local amendments by January 1, 2023. The City’s proposed adoption of the newest California Building Standards Code includes certain local amendments, particularly to the Fire Code, which are necessary due to local geological, topographic, and climatic conditions of the City of Roseville.

To ensure these local amendments are adopted with and made part of the updated California Building Standards Code before the January 1, 2023 date, it is recommended that the City Council also adopt an urgency ordinance amending Title 16 of the Roseville Municipal Code to be effective immediately. Because an urgency ordinance is effective immediately, the City will have satisfied any requirements to have the Building Standards Code and any local amendments adopted prior to January 1, 2023.

Thus, the items before the City Council are the second reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 6571 and adoption of a separate urgency ordinance, both of which will amend Title 16 of the Roseville Municipal Code to adopt the 2022 California Building Standards Code and the necessary local amendments. It is recommended that Council approve and adopt both items.

FISCAL IMPACT
The fiscal impact on the City includes new code resources and staff training on the updated Building Code Standards. These costs have been accounted for within the current budgets of both the Fire Department and the Development Services Department.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Adoption of the Building Standards Code meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Not applicable.

Respectfully Submitted,
Jason Rizzi, Assistant Fire Chief
Rick Bartee, Fire Chief
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Ordinance 6571
Ordinance 6572
ORDINANCE NO. 6571

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AMENDING SECTION

16.04.100 OF CHAPTER 16.04, RE-ADOPTING AND AMENDING SECTION 16.04.310 OF CHAPTER 16.04, AND REPEALING SECTION 16.04.830 OF CHAPTER 16.04, AMENDING SECTIONS 16.16.020 OF CHAPTER 16.16, RE-ADOPTING SECTION

16.16.030 OF CHAPTER 16.16, AMENDING SECTIONS 16.16.040, 16.16.050, 16.16.060,

16.16.110 AND 16.16.130 OF CHAPTER 16.16 OF TITLE 16 OF THE ROSEVILLE

MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. Section 16.04.100 of Chapter 16.04 of Title 16 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

16.04.100 California Building Standards Code—Adopted.

A. The 2022 California Building Standards Code is hereby adopted by the City of Roseville and incorporated by reference into the City of Roseville Municipal Code, as amended by this chapter. The 2022 California Building Standards Code includes, but is not limited to, the following:

1. 2022 California Building Code-Volumes 1 and 2 of the California Code of Regulations Title 24 Part 2.

2. 2022 California Residential Code of the California Code of Regulations Title 24 Part 2.5.

3. Appendix AH, Patio Covers of the 2022 California Residential Code of the California Code of Regulations Title 24 Part 2.5.

4. 2022 California Electrical Code of the California Code of Regulations Title 24 Part

3. Part 4.

5. 2022 California Mechanical Code of the California Code of Regulations Title 24

6. 2022 California Plumbing Code of the California Code of Regulations Title 24 Part 5, including appendix A and M of the 2022 California Plumbing Code.

7. 2022 California Energy Code of the California Code of Regulations Title 24 Part 6.

8. 2022 California Historical Building Code of the California Code of Regulations Title 24 Part 8.

9. 2022 California Existing Building Code of the California Code of Regulations Title 24 Part 10.
2 10. 2022 California Green Building Standards Code of the California Code of Regulations Title 24 Part 11.

B. There is at least one copy of said code on file in the office of the building official for use and examination by the public.

SECTION 2. Section 16.04.310 of Chapter 16.04 of Title 16 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby re-adopted and amended to read as follows:

16.04.310 Findings and modifications.

A. The city council of the City of Roseville finds and declares that the additions, modifications, and changes made to these codes are necessary for the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare due to climatic, geological, or topographical conditions. These amendments are authorized under Health and Safety Code Section 17958 and are identified as follows:

1. Climatic. Average yearly rainfall for the city is approximately 18 inches; with the majority occurring between October and April. During the summer months, there is generally no measurable precipitation and temperatures for this dry period range from 70 to 112 degrees Fahrenheit. Pools are common as a result of the high summer temperatures. High summer month temperatures are frequently accompanied by light to gusty westerly and northerly winds. The relative humidity during the summer months averages from two to 30 millimeters of mercury (Hg), which is considered arid. The city is surrounded by thousands of acres of grasslands which, during the summer months are dried to the point at which they are exceedingly combustible and easily ignited.

2. Topographical. The city is segmented by several topographical and physical features, including minor rivers, steep canyons, natural parkways, open space, freeways, railroad tracks, drainage canals, and sprawling industrial facilities. Heavy traffic congestion on city streets acts as a barrier for fire and emergency vehicles providing timely response. Preservation of wetland areas, natural parkways, riparian corridors, vernal pools, open space, and endangered species’ habitats have all contributed to access problems while also resulting in exemptions from vegetation reduction programs. These situations, though environmentally important, increase the demands on the fire department due to extreme fire hazards created by increased fuel loading and access limitations. These conditions also result in natural aquifers that the city uses for water, resulting in differing water sources.

3. Geological. The city is located within a Seismic Design Category D area and is subject to ground tremors. Flooding has occurred in the portions of the city that lie adjacent to Roseville’s numerous creeks and streams.

B. The building official is authorized to render interpretations of this code and make and enforce rules and supplemental regulations in order to carry out its application. The building official maybe guided by future supplements to the California Building Code. Such interpretations, rules and regulations and supplements shall conform with the intent and purpose 3 of the California Building Code and shall be available to the public during normal business hours.

C. When there are practical difficulties involved in carrying out the provisions of this code, the building official may grant modifications for individual cases. The building official shall first find that a special individual reason makes the strict letter of this code impractical and that the modification is in conformance with the intent and purpose of this code and that such modification does not lessen any fire-protection requirements or any degree of structural integrity. The details of any action granting modifications shall be recorded and entered in the files of the City of Roseville.

SECTION 3. Section 16.04.830 of Chapter 16.04 of Title 16 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby repealed in its entirety:

SECTION 4. Section 16.16.020 of Chapter 16.16 of Title 16 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

16.16.020 California Fire Code and International Fire Code—Adopted by reference.

The 2022 California Fire Code Title 24, Part 9 of the California Code of Regulations, together with Appendices B, BB, C, CC, D, as well as the 2021 International Fire Code, save and except such portions as are hereunder deleted, modified, or amended, are hereby adopted by reference.

SECTION 5. Section 16.16.030 of Chapter 16.16 of Title 16 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby re-adopted in its entirety to read:

16.16.30 Findings.

The city council of the City of Roseville finds and declares that the additions, modifications, and changes made to these codes are necessary for the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare due to climatic, geological, or topographical conditions. These amendments are authorized under Health and Safety Code Section 17958 and are identified as follows:

A. Climatic. Average yearly rainfall for the city is approximately 18 inches; with the majority occurring between October and April. During the summer months, there is generally no measurable precipitation and temperatures for this dry period range from 70 to 112 degrees Fahrenheit. High summer month temperatures are frequently accompanied by light to gusty westerly and northerly winds. The relative humidity during the summer months averages from two to 30 millimeters of mercury (Hg), which is considered arid. The city is surrounded by thousands of acres of grasslands which, during the summer months are dried to the point at which they are exceedingly combustible and easily ignited.

B. Topographical. The city is segmented by several topographical and physical features, including minor rivers, steep canyons, natural parkways, open space, freeways, railroad tracks, drainage canals, and sprawling industrial facilities. Heavy traffic congestion on city streets acts as a barrier for fire and emergency vehicles providing timely response. Preservation of wetland areas, natural parkways, riparian corridors, vernal pools, open space, and endangered 4 species’ habitats have all contributed to access problems while also resulting in exemptions from vegetation reduction programs. These situations, though environmentally important, increase the demands on the fire department due to extreme fire hazards created by increased fuel loading and access limitations.

C. Geological. The city is located within a seismic design category D area and is subject to ground tremors. Flooding has occurred in the portions of the city that lie adjacent to Roseville’s numerous creeks and streams.

SECTION 6. Section 16.16.040 of Chapter 16.16 of Title 16 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

16.16.40 Permits and fees.

A. Chapter 1, Section 107 of the California Fire Code, as adopted by the city, is hereby amended to read as follows:
107 Fees. Each person who applies for, requests, or receives a permit, permit amendment, or service furnished by the fire department shall, at such time, pay the applicable fee or fees provided for by resolution of the city council.

B. Minimum Fee Remittance. Prior to providing service, except for emergency services, a minimum fee remittance is required based on the approved fee established forsaid service(s). The minimum amount for an estimated fee calculation is required at the time of request for service. Adjustments to the estimated fee may be made depending upon work required.

C. Modification of Fees. The fire chief shall have the authority to waive or modify any fee imposed due to services provided by the fire department as stated herein and established by resolution of the city council for good cause providing such waiver or modification request is submitted in writing, stating the reason such waiver or modification is necessary, prior to the payment of the fee.

SECTION 7. Section 16.16.050 of Chapter 16.16 of Title 16 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

16.16.050 Appeals.

Chapter 1, Section 111.1 of the California Fire Code, as adopted by the city, is hereby amended to read as follows:
111.1 Appeals. Any person aggrieved by any decision or action of the Chief or designated representative may appeal the decision or action subject to the provisions of Section 16.04.110 of the Municipal Code referring to the Board of Appeals. The Board of Appeals designated therein shall also serve as the Board of Appeals under the California Fire Code. The fire chief or his or her designee shall serve as ex-officio member of the Board of Appeals in all appeals under the California Fire Code. 5 SECTION 8. Section 16.16.060 of Chapter 16.16 of Title 16 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

16.16.060 Violations.

Chapter 1, Section 112.4 of the California Fire Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
112.4 Violation penalties. Persons who shall violate a provision of this code or shall fail to comply with any of the requirements thereof or who shall erect, install, alter, repair or do work in violation of the approved construction documents or directive of the fire code official, or of a permit or certificate used under provisions of this code, shall be charged with either an infraction or a misdemeanor at the discretion of the city attorney.

SECTION 9. Section 16.16.110 of Chapter 16.16 of Title 16 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

16.16.110 Fire protection systems.

A. Fire Control Room. An approved fire control room shall be provided for all buildings protected by an automatic fire extinguishing system. Fire control rooms shall meet the following requirements:

1. Fire control rooms shall contain only fire system control valves, fire alarm control panels and other related fire system equipment.

2. The location of the fire control room shall be approved by the fire code official.

3. Fire control rooms shall have minimum dimensions of five feet by seven feet.

4. Fire control rooms shall be constructed with a one-hour fire rating.

5. Fire control rooms shall be provided with an exterior access door approved by the fire code official.

6. Durable signage shall be provided on the exterior side of the access door.

7. Storage of materials in fire control rooms is prohibited.

B. New Buildings. An approved automatic sprinkler system shall be provided in every new building where the total fire area is 3,600 square feet or greater.

C. Passive Purge Sprinkler System. One- and two-family dwellings designed and installed with a sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13D shall utilize passage purge on a remote domestic plumbing fixture.

D. Building Additions. An approved automatic sprinkler system shall be provided in every existing building, except one- and two-family dwellings, when an addition to the floor area is made increasing the size of the building to 3,600 square feet or greater. 6 E. Design Criteria. Minimum sprinkler systems design requirements are asfollows unless otherwise approved by the fire code official:

1. Office buildings shall be designed to Ordinary Hazard Group 1.

2. Mercantile and Storage Occupancies with a ceiling height of up to 20 feet shall be designed to Ordinary Hazard Group 2; with a minimum design area of 3,000 square feet.

3. Mercantile and Storage Occupancies with a ceiling height exceeding 20 feet shall be designed with a minimum sprinkler density of 0.495; with a minimum design area of 2,000 square feet.

F. Upright Sprinklers. Upright sprinklers shall be installed in all construction types.

Exceptions:

1. The following construction types: Type IA, IB, IIA.

2. In all construction types where the roof-system is exposed and contains no ceiling structure or concealed spaces.

3. Sprinkler systems designed in accordance with NFPA 13D.

4. Sprinkler systems designed in accordance with NFPA 13R.

G. Chapter 9, Section 903.4.2 of the California Fire Code, as adopted by the city, is hereby amended to read as follows:
903.4.2 Alarms. One exterior approved audible alarm and visual strobe device, located on the exterior of the building in an approved location, shall be connected to each automatic sprinkler system. Such sprinkler water-flow alarm devices shall be activated by water flow equivalent to the flow of a single sprinkler of the smallest orifice size installed in the system. Where a fire alarm system is installed, actuation of the automatic sprinkler system shall actuate the building fire alarm system. Visible alarm notification appliances shall not be required except when required by Section 907. A single approved audible alarm and visual strobe device shall be provided in the interior of the building in a normally occupied location within each space, unless otherwise required by the California Fire Code.

H. Chapter 9, Section 907.6.6 of the California Fire Code, as adopted by the city, is hereby amended to read as follows:
907.6.6 Monitoring. Fire alarm systems required by this chapter or by the California Building Code shall be monitored by a Central Station Service (UUFX) that is listed in the current edition of the UL Online Certifications Directory unless otherwise required by the California Fire Code.

Exceptions: Monitoring by a supervised station is not required for:

1. Single and multi-station smoke alarms required by Section 907.2.11.

2. Smoke detectors in Group I-3 occupancies shall be monitored in accordance with Section 907.2.6.3.
7 3. Automatic sprinkler systems in one- and two-family dwellings.

I. Combination Alarm Systems. Combination fire and burglar alarm systems are not permitted. Exception: Group R-3 and R-3.1.

J. Fire-Extinguishing Equipment. Automatic fire-extinguishing systems for the protection of grease removal devices, hoods, duct systems and cooking equipment shall be monitored in accordance with 907.6.6.

K. Fire Alarm Control Panel. Buildings requiring a fire alarm system shall be equipped with a single fire alarm control panel unless approved by the Fire Code Official.

SECTION 10. Section 16.16.130 of Chapter 16.16 of Title 16 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

16.16.130 Fire safety during construction and demolition.

A. Chapter 33, Section 3311.1 of the California Fire Code, as adopted by the city, is hereby amended to read as follows:
3311.1 Required access. Approved vehicle access for firefighting shall be provided to all construction or demolition sites. Vehicle access shall be provided to within 100 feet (30,480 mm) of temporary or permanent fire department connections. Vehicle access shall be provided with an AC pavement or equivalent surface capable of supporting vehicle loading so as to provide all weather driving capabilities. Said fire access road shall be constructed prior to the presence of on site combustible products and shall be maintained throughout the construction process.

B. Premises Identification. Buildings under construction shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed at the entry point of each fire access road.

SECTION 11. This ordinance shall be effective at the expiration of thirty (30) days from the date of adoption.

SECTION 12. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause this ordinance to be published in full at least once within fourteen (14) days after it is adopted in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, or shall within fourteen (14) days after its adoption cause this ordinance to be posted in full in at least three (3) public places in the City and enter in the Ordinance Book a certificate stating the time and place of said publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
8 NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk
ORDINANCE NO. 6572

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AMENDING SECTION

16.04.100 OF CHAPTER 16.04, RE-ADOPTING AND AMENDING SECTION 16.04.310 OF CHAPTER 16.04, AND REPEALING SECTION 16.04.830 OF CHAPTER 16.04, AMENDING SECTIONS 16.16.020 OF CHAPTER 16.16, RE-ADOPTING SECTION

16.16.030 OF CHAPTER 16.16, AMENDING SECTIONS 16.16.040, 16.16.050, 16.16.060,

16.16.110 AND 16.16.130 OF CHAPTER 16.16 OF TITLE 16 OF THE ROSEVILLE

MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION, AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 7, 2022 AS AN

URGENCY ORDINANCE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. Section 16.04.100 of Chapter 16.04 of Title 16 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

16.04.100 California Building Standards Code—Adopted.

A. The 2022 California Building Standards Code is hereby adopted by the City of Roseville and incorporated by reference into the City of Roseville Municipal Code, as amended by this chapter. The 2022 California Building Standards Code includes, but is not limited to, the following:

1. 2022 California Building Code-Volumes 1 and 2 of the California Code of Regulations Title 24 Part 2.

2. 2022 California Residential Code of the California Code of Regulations Title 24 Part 2.5.

3. Appendix AH, Patio Covers of the 2022 California Residential Code of the California Code of Regulations Title 24 Part 2.5.

4. 2022 California Electrical Code of the California Code of Regulations Title 24 Part

3. Part 4.

5. 2022 California Mechanical Code of the California Code of Regulations Title 24

6. 2022 California Plumbing Code of the California Code of Regulations Title 24 Part 5, including appendix A and M of the 2022 California Plumbing Code.

7. 2022 California Energy Code of the California Code of Regulations Title 24 Part 6.

8. 2022 California Historical Building Code of the California Code of Regulations Title 24 Part 8.

9. 2022 California Existing Building Code of the California Code of Regulations Title 24 Part 10.
2 10. 2022 California Green Building Standards Code of the California Code of Regulations Title 24 Part 11.

B. There is at least one copy of said code on file in the office of the building official for use and examination by the public.

SECTION 2. Section 16.04.310 of Chapter 16.04 of Title 16 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby re-adopted and amended to read as follows:

16.04.310 Findings and modifications.

A. The city council of the City of Roseville finds and declares that the additions, modifications, and changes made to these codes are necessary for the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare due to climatic, geological, or topographical conditions. These amendments are authorized under Health and Safety Code Section 17958 and are identified as follows:

1. Climatic. Average yearly rainfall for the city is approximately 18 inches; with the majority occurring between October and April. During the summer months, there is generally no measurable precipitation and temperatures for this dry period range from 70 to 112 degrees Fahrenheit. Pools are common as a result of the high summer temperatures. High summer month temperatures are frequently accompanied by light to gusty westerly and northerly winds. The relative humidity during the summer months averages from two to 30 millimeters of mercury (Hg), which is considered arid. The city is surrounded by thousands of acres of grasslands which, during the summer months are dried to the point at which they are exceedingly combustible and easily ignited.

2. Topographical. The city is segmented by several topographical and physical features, including minor rivers, steep canyons, natural parkways, open space, freeways, railroad tracks, drainage canals, and sprawling industrial facilities. Heavy traffic congestion on city streets acts as a barrier for fire and emergency vehicles providing timely response. Preservation of wetland areas, natural parkways, riparian corridors, vernal pools, open space, and endangered species’ habitats have all contributed to access problems while also resulting in exemptions from vegetation reduction programs. These situations, though environmentally important, increase the demands on the fire department due to extreme fire hazards created by increased fuel loading and access limitations. These conditions also result in natural aquifers that the city uses for water, resulting in differing water sources.

3. Geological. The city is located within a Seismic Design Category D area and is subject to ground tremors. Flooding has occurred in the portions of the city that lie adjacent to Roseville’s numerous creeks and streams.

B. The building official is authorized to render interpretations of this code and make and enforce rules and supplemental regulations in order to carry out its application. The building official maybe guided by future supplements to the California Building Code. Such interpretations, rules and regulations and supplements shall conform with the intent and purpose 3 of the California Building Code and shall be available to the public during normal business hours.

C. When there are practical difficulties involved in carrying out the provisions of this code, the building official may grant modifications for individual cases. The building official shall first find that a special individual reason makes the strict letter of this code impractical and that the modification is in conformance with the intent and purpose of this code and that such modification does not lessen any fire-protection requirements or any degree of structural integrity. The details of any action granting modifications shall be recorded and entered in the files of the City of Roseville.

SECTION 3. Section 16.04.830 of Chapter 16.04 of Title 16 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby repealed in its entirety:

SECTION 4. Section 16.16.020 of Chapter 16.16 of Title 16 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

16.16.020 California Fire Code and International Fire Code—Adopted by reference.

The 2022 California Fire Code Title 24, Part 9 of the California Code of Regulations, together with Appendices B, BB, C, CC, D, as well as the 2021 International Fire Code, save and except such portions as are hereunder deleted, modified, or amended, are hereby adopted by reference.

SECTION 5. Section 16.16.030 of Chapter 16.16 of Title 16 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby re-adopted in its entirety to read:

16.16.30 Findings.

The city council of the City of Roseville finds and declares that the additions, modifications, and changes made to these codes are necessary for the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare due to climatic, geological, or topographical conditions. These amendments are authorized under Health and Safety Code Section 17958 and are identified as follows:

A. Climatic. Average yearly rainfall for the city is approximately 18 inches; with the majority occurring between October and April. During the summer months, there is generally no measurable precipitation and temperatures for this dry period range from 70 to 112 degrees Fahrenheit. High summer month temperatures are frequently accompanied by light to gusty westerly and northerly winds. The relative humidity during the summer months averages from two to 30 millimeters of mercury (Hg), which is considered arid. The city is surrounded by thousands of acres of grasslands which, during the summer months are dried to the point at which they are exceedingly combustible and easily ignited.

B. Topographical. The city is segmented by several topographical and physical features, including minor rivers, steep canyons, natural parkways, open space, freeways, railroad tracks, drainage canals, and sprawling industrial facilities. Heavy traffic congestion on city streets acts as a barrier for fire and emergency vehicles providing timely response. Preservation 4 of wetland areas, natural parkways, riparian corridors, vernal pools, open space, and endangered species’ habitats have all contributed to access problems while also resulting in exemptions from vegetation reduction programs. These situations, though environmentally important, increase the demands on the fire department due to extreme fire hazards created by increased fuel loading and access limitations.

C. Geological. The city is located within a seismic design category D area and is subject to ground tremors. Flooding has occurred in the portions of the city that lie adjacent to Roseville’s numerous creeks and streams.

SECTION 6. Section 16.16.040 of Chapter 16.16 of Title 16 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

16.16.40 Permits and fees.

A. Chapter 1, Section 107 of the California Fire Code, as adopted by the city, is hereby amended to read as follows:
107 Fees. Each person who applies for, requests, or receives a permit, permit amendment, or service furnished by the fire department shall, at such time, pay the applicable fee or fees provided for by resolution of the city council.

B. Minimum Fee Remittance. Prior to providing service, except for emergency services, a minimum fee remittance is required based on the approved fee established forsaid service(s). The minimum amount for an estimated fee calculation is required at the time of request for service. Adjustments to the estimated fee may be made depending upon work required.

C. Modification of Fees. The fire chief shall have the authority to waive or modify any fee imposed due to services provided by the fire department as stated herein and established by resolution of the city council for good cause providing such waiver or modification request is submitted in writing, stating the reason such waiver or modification is necessary, prior to the payment of the fee.

SECTION 7. Section 16.16.050 of Chapter 16.16 of Title 16 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

16.16.050 Appeals.

Chapter 1, Section 111.1 of the California Fire Code, as adopted by the city, is hereby amended to read as follows:
111.1 Appeals. Any person aggrieved by any decision or action of the Chief or designated representative may appeal the decision or action subject to the provisions of Section 16.04.110 of the Municipal Code referring to the Board of Appeals. The Board of Appeals designated therein shall also serve as the Board of Appeals under the California Fire Code. The fire chief or his or her designee shall serve as ex-officio member of the Board of Appeals in all appeals under the California Fire Code. 5 SECTION 8. Section 16.16.060 of Chapter 16.16 of Title 16 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

16.16.060 Violations.

Chapter 1, Section 112.4 of the California Fire Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
112.4 Violation penalties. Persons who shall violate a provision of this code or shall fail to comply with any of the requirements thereof or who shall erect, install, alter, repair or do work in violation of the approved construction documents or directive of the fire code official, or of a permit or certificate used under provisions of this code, shall be charged with either an infraction or a misdemeanor at the discretion of the city attorney.

SECTION 9. Section 16.16.110 of Chapter 16.16 of Title 16 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

16.16.110 Fire protection systems.

A. Fire Control Room. An approved fire control room shall be provided for all buildings protected by an automatic fire extinguishing system. Fire control rooms shall meet the following requirements:

1. Fire control rooms shall contain only fire system control valves, fire alarm control panels and other related fire system equipment.

2. The location of the fire control room shall be approved by the fire code official.

3. Fire control rooms shall have minimum dimensions of five feet by seven feet.

4. Fire control rooms shall be constructed with a one-hour fire rating.

5. Fire control rooms shall be provided with an exterior access door approved by the fire code official.

6. Durable signage shall be provided on the exterior side of the access door.

7. Storage of materials in fire control rooms is prohibited.

B. New Buildings. An approved automatic sprinkler system shall be provided in every new building where the total fire area is 3,600 square feet or greater.

C. Passive Purge Sprinkler System. One- and two-family dwellings designed and installed with a sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13D shall utilize passage purge on a remote domestic plumbing fixture.

D. Building Additions. An approved automatic sprinkler system shall be provided in every existing building, except one- and two-family dwellings, when an addition to the floor area is made increasing the size of the building to 3,600 square feet or greater. 6 E. Design Criteria. Minimum sprinkler systems design requirements are as follows unless otherwise approved by the fire code official:

1. Office buildings shall be designed to Ordinary Hazard Group 1.

2. Mercantile and Storage Occupancies with a ceiling height of up to 20 feet shall be designed to Ordinary Hazard Group 2; with a minimum design area of 3,000 square feet.

3. Mercantile and Storage Occupancies with a ceiling height exceeding 20 feet shall be designed with a minimum sprinkler density of 0.495; with a minimum design area of 2,000 square feet.

F. Upright Sprinklers. Upright sprinklers shall be installed in all construction types.

Exceptions:

1. The following construction types: Type IA, IB, IIA.

2. In all construction types where the roof-system is exposed and contains no ceiling structure or concealed spaces.

3. Sprinkler systems designed in accordance with NFPA 13D.

4. Sprinkler systems designed in accordance with NFPA 13R.

G. Chapter 9, Section 903.4.2 of the California Fire Code, as adopted by the city, is hereby amended to read as follows:
903.4.2 Alarms. One exterior approved audible alarm and visual strobe device, located on the exterior of the building in an approved location, shall be connected to each automatic sprinkler system. Such sprinkler water-flow alarm devices shall be activated by water flow equivalent to the flow of a single sprinkler of the smallest orifice size installed in the system. Where a fire alarm system is installed, actuation of the automatic sprinkler system shall actuate the building fire alarm system. Visible alarm notification appliances shall not be required except when required by Section 907. A single approved audible alarm and visual strobe device shall be provided in the interior of the building in a normally occupied location within each space, unless otherwise required by the California Fire Code.

H. Chapter 9, Section 907.6.6 of the California Fire Code, as adopted by the city, is hereby amended to read as follows:
907.6.6 Monitoring. Fire alarm systems required by this chapter or by the California Building Code shall be monitored by a Central Station Service (UUFX) that is listed in the current edition of the UL Online Certifications Directory unless otherwise required by the California Fire Code.

Exceptions: Monitoring by a supervised station is not required for:

1. Single and multi-station smoke alarms required by Section 907.2.11.

2. Smoke detectors in Group I-3 occupancies shall be monitored in accordance with Section 907.2.6.3.
7 3. Automatic sprinkler systems in one- and two-family dwellings.

I. Combination Alarm Systems. Combination fire and burglar alarm systems are not permitted. Exception: Group R-3 and R-3.1.

J. Fire-Extinguishing Equipment. Automatic fire-extinguishing systems for the protection of grease removal devices, hoods, duct systems and cooking equipment shall be monitored in accordance with 907.6.6.

K. Fire Alarm Control Panel. Buildings requiring a fire alarm system shall be equipped with a single fire alarm control panel unless approved by the Fire Code Official.

SECTION 10. Section 16.16.130 of Chapter 16.16 of Title 16 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

16.16.130 Fire safety during construction and demolition.

A. Chapter 33, Section 3311.1 of the California Fire Code, as adopted by the city, is hereby amended to read as follows:
3311.1 Required access. Approved vehicle access for firefighting shall be provided to all construction or demolition sites. Vehicle access shall be provided to within 100 feet (30,480 mm) of temporary or permanent fire department connections. Vehicle access shall be provided with an AC pavement or equivalent surface capable of supporting vehicle loading so as to provide all weather driving capabilities. Said fire access road shall be constructed prior to the presence of on site combustible products and shall be maintained throughout the construction process.

B. Premises Identification. Buildings under construction shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed at the entry point of each fire access road.

SECTION 11. This ordinance shall be effective December 7, 2022 as an urgency ordinance.

SECTION 12. Urgency Ordinance.

This ordinance is hereby declared to be an urgency measure, immediately necessary for the public peace, health and safety and shall take effect December 7, 2022. A statement of urgency is as follows:

It is necessary to amend Title 16 of the Roseville Municipal Code to adopt the 2022 California Building Standards Code and certain local amendments thereto, which are necessary for the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare, and for the orderly and necessary continuance of operations of the City.

SECTION 13. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the Ordinance Book under the record of the ordinance a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of said publication by posting. 8 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2441
File #: 0323 & 0214 & 0201-01
Title: State of California Office of Traffic Safety - Grant Award & Budget Adjustment Contact: Mark Peinado 916-774-5021 [email protected] Scott Blynn 916-746-1076 [email protected]
Rob Baquera 916-774-5015 [email protected]
Meeting Date: 12/7/2022
Item #: 6.29.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to accept the grant award from the California Office of Traffic Safety in the amount of $175,000 and authorize the City Manager or his Designee to execute the required documents on behalf of the City. Additionally, staff recommends that City Council adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment in the amount of $175,000.

BACKGROUND
The goal of the California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Grant Program is to prevent serious injury and death resulting from motor vehicle crashes so that all roadway users arrive at their destination safely. Using Federal Highway Safety Program funds, the OTS partners with political subdivisions of the State to address California's highway safety needs at the state, county and local level.

The Office of Traffic Safety funds programs in the following areas:

Alcohol Impaired Driving - These programs aim to prevent people from driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol or other drugs and to remove DUI drivers from the road. OTS grants use a comprehensive approach by funding educational, prevention, and enforcement programs and by focusing on high-risk groups.

Distracted Driving - These programs aim to reduce collisions involving drivers using handheld devices. Countermeasures include increased and focused enforcement, observational surveys, and public awareness campaigns, while other actions are being developed to change behavior.

Drug Impaired Driving - These programs aim to decrease the average response time for the arrival of appropriate equipment at collision sites in rural areas. Funding also supports increased officer training in the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Advanced Roadside Impaired Driving Enforcement (ARIDE) and Drug Recognition Evaluator (DRE) programs, which should lead to better detection of drug-impaired drivers.

Motorcycle Safety - These programs support new actions in the effort to reduce motorcycle collisions, injuries and fatalities. Activities include enhancing the motorcycle safety awareness component in driver education courses, encouraging the use of proper protective equipment for riders, outreach to un-endorsed motorcycle owners offering refresher rider training courses, and consideration of motorcycle safety in roadway design.

Occupant Protection - These programs support statewide and local public information campaigns, increased enforcement, and community education, outreach, and training. More specifically, the programs provide child safety seats to low-income families, conduct child safety seat check ups, and educate teens about using seat belts.

Pedestrian Safety/Bicycle Safety - These programs increase awareness of traffic rules, rights, and responsibilities among various age groups. These programs are developed to be attractive and interactive in an effort to truly impact students. At the elementary school level, parents and teachers are drawn into the programs as active role models and mentors in traffic safety. Grantees conduct traffic safety rodeos and presentations in an effort to build students' skills and demonstrate proper practical application of those skills. To boost compliance with the law and decrease injuries, safety helmets are properly fitted and distributed to children in need for use with bicycles, scooters, skateboards, and skates. There is a special emphasis on programs designed exclusively for the hard-to-reach population at the middle and high school levels. Additional outreach endeavors include programs targeting the senior population along with a multicultural approach to address safer driving and walking behaviors.

Police Traffic Services - These programs focus on a comprehensive approach to enforce and encourage compliance with seat belt use, impaired driving, speed limit, red light running, and other traffic laws. The grants are highly effective in reducing traffic collisions by dedicating resources to selective enforcement and education programs. These comprehensive programs have a longlasting impact in reducing fatal and injury collisions. Under these programs, communities use available public and private assets to identify and attack significant traffic safety problems and other vehicle related crimes.

Traffic Records/Roadway Safety - These programs concentrate on the vehicle operating environment and are strongly influenced by enforcement, engineering, and utilizing relevant data generated by those activities to improve roadway safety and traffic records. OTS advocates efforts to automate traffic collision database systems and the ability to analyze and map highcollision locations. Grant-funded items include hardware, software, and expert services necessary to aid in the automation of manual processes, eliminate process duplication, and facilitate enhanced data gathering and data sharing.

Within the parameters of this grant, the goal of the Roseville Police Department (RPD) is to address two critical crash factors – excessive speed and impaired driving. For the period 2017- 2019 (see detail below), the number of fatal and injury crashes was disappointingly consistent – averaging 1,000 victims per year. While the 2020 total dropped to 699 victims, that decrease was attributable to the pandemic’s impact on traffic volumes, rather than a systemic change in enforcement or driver behavior.
2017 - 1112
2018 - 978
2019 - 909
2020 - 699
During the three-year period between 2016 and 2018, there were over 500 speed-related fatal and injury accidents in Roseville. OTS traffic statistics validate the RPD data points. In 2018 the OTS statistics show that Roseville ranked 1/59 and in 2019 the ranking was 6/59 for speedrelated crashes in Group B cities.

In addition to speed, DUI is a leading cause of crashes in Roseville. RPD data shows that from 2017-2020 there were 150 victims killed or injured in alcohol-related crashes. Roseville attracts many people to its restaurants and bars after work hours. According to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, Roseville has 281 “active on-sale retail license establishments” (i.e., bars and restaurants). This can be a problem on roadways when people leave these establishments after having too much to drink. Nighttime crashes in Roseville, from the hours of 9pm - 3am, totaled more than 1,300 from 2017-2020.

In addition, the City’s proximity to Folsom State Park serves to compound the number of impaired drivers on Roseville roads. While alcohol is prohibited in the park, many drivers in the warm weather months, depart from the park on a major Roseville artery (Douglas Blvd.), after over consumption of alcohol.

Crashes due to speed and/or DUI are hazardous not only to the offender but to everyone in their path. This includes other drivers, motorcyclists, bicyclists, and pedestrians. It is also important to note that there may be an overlap in the reason a crash occur. For example, someone who is DUI may cause a hit-and-run crash. Targeting individuals that crash due to speed and/or DUI can serve to reduce crashes involving motorcyclists, bicyclists, and pedestrians.

The Grant Award will provide funding for the following amounts and purpose:
- Overtime to fund increased traffic safety enforcement: $136,059 - Traffic safety equipment (LIDAR, RADAR, Speed Trailer, DUI Checkpoint supplies, and educational materials) : $32,376
- Support traffic related training: $6,565
Total Grant Award amount: $175,000

FISCAL IMPACT
The recommended budget adjustment will appropriate $175,000 of grant funding in the City's Grants Fund. The budget adjustment will have no net impact on the City's General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Acceptance of a grant award and approval of a budget adjustment meets the above criteria and are not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services
Respectfully Submitted,
Mark Peinado, Managment Analyst
Troy Bergstrom, Police Chief
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-457
OTS Grant AwardAgreement
Ordinance 6578
Budget Adjustment
RESOLUTION NO. 22-457

ACCEPTING A GRANT AWARD FROM

THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA - OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY
WHEREAS, the Roseville Police Department was awarded a $175,000 grant by the State of California - Office of Traffic Safety; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville that the City of Roseville accepts the grant award from the State of California – Office of Traffic Safety and the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute any required documents.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that as the grant recipient, the City of Roseville agrees to comply with all conditions and requirements related to conduct for the award; and PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk
8/16/2022 3:12:10 PM Page 1 of 16
State of California – Office of Traffic Safety

GRANT AGREEMENT

GRANT NUMBER
PT23161

1. GRANT TITLE
Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP)

2. NAME OF AGENCY 3. Grant Period
Roseville From:

To:
10/01/2022
09/30/2023 4. AGENCY UNIT TO ADMINISTER GRANT
Roseville Police Department

5. GRANT DESCRIPTION
Best practice strategies will be conducted to reduce the number of persons killed and injured in crashes involving alcohol and other primary crash factors. The funded strategies may include impaired driving enforcement, enforcement operations focusing on primary crash factors, distracted driving, night-time seat belt enforcement, special enforcement operations encouraging motorcycle safety, enforcement and public awareness in areas with a high number of bicycle and pedestrian crashes, and educational programs. These strategies are designed to earn media attention thus enhancing the overall deterrent effect.

6. Federal Funds Allocated Under This Agreement Shall Not Exceed: $175,000.00

7. TERMS AND CONDITIONS: The parties agree to comply with the terms and conditions of the following which are by this reference made a part of the Agreement:
 Schedule A – Problem Statement, Goals and Objectives and Method of Procedure  Schedule B – Detailed Budget Estimate and Sub-Budget Estimate (if applicable)  Schedule B-1 – Budget Narrative and Sub-Budget Narrative (if applicable)  Exhibit A – Certifications and Assurances
 Exhibit B* – OTS Grant Program Manual
 Exhibit C – Grant Electronic Management System (GEMS) Access *Items shown with an asterisk (*), are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this agreement as if attached hereto.

These documents can be viewed at the OTS home web page under Grants: www.ots.ca.gov.

We, the officials named below, hereby swear under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that we are duly authorized to legally bind the Grant recipient to the above described Grant terms and conditions.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties hereto.

8. Approval Signatures
A. GRANT DIRECTOR B. AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL
NAME:

TITLE:

EMAIL:

PHONE:

ADDRESS:

Mike Ryland
Sgt.
[email protected]
(916) 746-1064
10561 Junction Boulevard
Roseville, CA 95678
NAME:

TITLE:

EMAIL:

PHONE:

ADDRESS:

Troy Bergstrom
Chief
[email protected]
(916) 774-5010
10561 Junction Boulevard
Roseville, CA 95678
(Signature) (Date) (Signature) (Date)
C. FISCAL OFFICIAL D. AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL OF OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY NAME:

TITLE:

EMAIL:

PHONE:

ADDRESS:

Mark Peinado
Budget Manager
[email protected]
(916) 774-5021
10561 Junction Boulevard
Roseville, CA 95678
NAME:

TITLE:

EMAIL:

PHONE:

ADDRESS:

Barbara Rooney
Director
[email protected]
(916) 509-3030
2208 Kausen Drive, Suite 300
Elk Grove, CA 95758
(Signature) (Date) (Signature) (Date)
8/16/2022 3:12:10 PM Page 2 of 16

10. PROJECTED EXPENDITURES
FUND CFDA ITEM/APPROPRIATION F.Y. CHAPTER STATUTE PROJECTED

EXPENDITURES

AGREEMENT
TOTAL $175,000.00

AMOUNT ENCUMBERED BY THIS DOCUMENT
I CERTIFY upon my own personal knowledge that the budgeted funds for the current budget year are available for the period and purpose of the expenditure stated above.
$175,000.00

PRIOR AMOUNT ENCUMBERED FOR THIS

AGREEMENT
$ 0.00
OTS ACCOUNTING OFFICER’S SIGNATURE DATE SIGNED TOTAL AMOUNT ENCUMBERED TO DATE $175,000.00
E. ACCOUNTING OFFICER OF OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY 9. SAM INFORMATION NAME: Carolyn Vu SAM #:

REGISTERED
ADDRESS:

CITY:

ZIP+4:

W49TKZLUYCJ3
311 Vernon St. Roseville, California 95678-
2634
Roseville
95678-2634
ADDRESS: 2208 Kausen Drive, Suite 300
Elk Grove, CA 95758
8/16/2022 3:12:10 PM Page 3 of 16
State of California – Office of Traffic Safety

GRANT AGREEMENT
Schedule A

GRANT NUMBER
PT23161

1. PROBLEM STATEMENT
Located within the Sacramento metropolitan area. Roseville is the largest city in Placer County, with a population of 141,500. Because the city is considered a regional shopping destination, the population increases to almost 200,000 people during business hours. Interstate 80 runs through Roseville and State Route 65 runs along the northern edge of the city. Roseville is located a few miles from Folsom State Park. Because of its proximity to a large metropolitan area, the park attracts millions of visitors every year, many of which travel through Roseville.

Retail sales play a significant role in Roseville’s economy, with the Westfield Galleria Mall being the secondlargest shopping mall in Northern California. In addition, the city is home to the Roseville Auto Mall, the Union Pacific railyard, several major medical facilities, and the Hewlett Packard Enterprise campus.

Roseville has a total area of 42.26 miles. Within the city boundaries, there are 485 centerline miles, 185 signalized intersections, 38.4 miles of Class 1 bike routes (multi-use trails), 233 miles of Class 2 bikes routes (bike lanes), and 6 miles of buffered bike lanes.

Within the parameters of this grant, the goal of the Roseville Police Department (RPD) is to address two critical crash factors – excessive speed and impaired driving.

For the period 2017-2019 (see detail below), the number of fatal and injury crashes was disappointingly consistent – averaging 1,000 victims per year. While the 2020 total dropped to 699 victims, that decrease was attributable to the pandemic’s impact on traffic volumes, rather than a systemic change in enforcement or driver behavior. Between 2016 and 2018, RPD traffic statistics show that there were over 500 speedrelated fatal and injury accidents in Roseville. 2017- 1112
2018 – 978
2019 – 909
2020 - 699
During the three years between 2016 and 2018, there we over 500 speed-related fatal and injury accidents in Roseville. RPD data shows that from 2017-2020 there were 150 victims killed or injured in alcohol-related crashes. Roseville attracts many people to its restaurants and bars after work hours. According to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, Roseville has 281 “active on-sale retail license establishments” (i.e., bars and restaurants). This can be a problem on roadways when people leave these establishments after having too much to drink. Nighttime crashes in Roseville from the hours of 2100-0300 totaled more than 1,300 from 2017-2020.

In addition, the city’s proximity to Folsom State Park serves to compound the number of impaired drivers on Roseville roads. While alcohol is prohibited in the park, many drivers in the warm weather months, depart from the park on a major Roseville artery (Douglas Blvd.), after having had too much to drink.

Crashes due to speed and DUI are hazardous not only to the offender but to everyone in their path. This includes other drivers, motorcyclists, bicyclists, and pedestrians. It is also important to note that there may be an overlap in the reason a crash occurs. For example, someone who is DUI may cause a hit-and-run crash. Targeting individuals that crash due to speed and/or DUI can serve to reduce crashes involving motorcyclists, bicyclists, and pedestrians.

2. PERFORMANCE MEASURES
A. Goals:

1. Reduce the number of persons killed in traffic crashes.

2. Reduce the number of persons injured in traffic crashes.

3. Reduce the number of pedestrians killed in traffic crashes.

4. Reduce the number of pedestrians injured in traffic crashes.

5. Reduce the number of bicyclists killed in traffic crashes.

6. Reduce the number of bicyclists injured in traffic crashes.

7. Reduce the number of persons killed in alcohol-involved crashes.

8. Reduce the number of persons injured in alcohol-involved crashes.

9. Reduce the number of persons killed in drug-involved crashes.

10. Reduce the number of persons injured in drug-involved crashes.

11. Reduce the number of persons killed in alcohol/drug combo-involved crashes. 8/16/2022 3:12:10 PM Page 4 of 16

12. Reduce the number of persons injured in alcohol/drug combo-involved crashes.

13. Reduce the number of motorcyclists killed in traffic crashes.

14. Reduce the number of motorcyclists injured in traffic crashes.

15. Reduce hit & run fatal crashes.

16. Reduce hit & run injury crashes.

17. Reduce nighttime (2100 - 0259 hours) fatal crashes.

18. Reduce nighttime (2100 - 0259 hours) injury crashes.

B. Objectives: Target Number

1. Issue a press release announcing the kick-off of the grant by November 15. The kick-off press releases and media advisories, alerts, and materials must be emailed to the OTS Public Information Officer at [email protected], and copied to your OTS Coordinator, for approval 14 days prior to the issuance date of the release.
1 2. Participate and report data (as required) in the following campaigns; Quarter 1:

National Walk to School Day, National Teen Driver Safety Week, NHTSA Winter Mobilization; Quarter 3: National Distracted Driving Awareness Month, National Motorcycle Safety Month, National Bicycle Safety Month, National Click it or Ticket Mobilization; Quarter 4: NHTSA Summer Mobilization, National Child Passenger Safety Week, and California's Pedestrian Safety Month.
10 3. Develop (by December 31) and/or maintain a “DUI BOLO” program to notify patrol and traffic officers to be on the lookout for identified repeat DUI offenders with a suspended or revoked license as a result of DUI convictions. Updated DUI BOLOs should be distributed to patrol and traffic officers monthly. 12 4. Send law enforcement personnel to the NHTSA Standardized Field Sobriety Testing (SFST) (minimum 16 hours) POST-certified training. 10 5. Send law enforcement personnel to the NHTSA Advanced Roadside Impaired Driving Enforcement (ARIDE) 16 hour POST-certified training. 2 6. Send law enforcement personnel to the Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) training. 4

7. Send law enforcement personnel to the DRE Recertification training. 4

8. Conduct DUI/DL Checkpoints. A minimum of 1 checkpoint should be conducted during the NHTSA Winter Mobilization and 1 during the Summer Mobilization. To enhance the overall deterrent effect and promote high visibility, it is recommended the grantee issue an advance press release and conduct social media activity for each checkpoint. For combination DUI/DL checkpoints, departments should issue press releases that mention DL's will be checked at the DUI/DL checkpoint. Signs for DUI/DL checkpoints should read "DUI/Driver's License Checkpoint Ahead." OTS does not fund or support independent DL checkpoints. Only on an exception basis and with OTS pre-approval will OTS fund checkpoints that begin prior to 1800 hours. When possible, DUI/DL Checkpoint screeners should be DRE- or ARIDE-trained.
2 9. Conduct DUI Saturation Patrol operation(s). 35

10. Conduct Traffic Enforcement operation(s), including but not limited to, primary crash factor violations.
8 11. Conduct highly publicized Distracted Driving enforcement operation(s) targeting drivers using hand held cell phones and texting.
7 12. Conduct highly publicized pedestrian and/or bicycle enforcement operation(s) in areas or during events with a high number of pedestrian and/or bicycle crashes resulting from violations made by pedestrians, bicyclists, and drivers. 4 13. Conduct Traffic Safety educational presentation(s) with an effort to reach community members. Note: Presentation(s) may include topics such as distracted driving, DUI, speed, bicycle and pedestrian safety, seat belts and child passenger safety.
1 14. Participate in highly visible collaborative DUI Enforcement operations. 7

15. Participate in highly visible collaborative Traffic Enforcement operations. 3

16. Conduct specialized enforcement operations focusing specifically on street racing and sideshow activities.
4 3. METHOD OF PROCEDURE
8/16/2022 3:12:10 PM Page 5 of 16
A. Phase 1 – Program Preparation (1st Quarter of Grant Year)  The department will develop operational plans to implement the “best practice” strategies outlined in the objectives section.
 All training needed to implement the program should be conducted this quarter.  All grant related purchases needed to implement the program should be made this quarter.  In order to develop/maintain the “DUI BOLOs,” research will be conducted to identify the “worst of the worst” repeat DUI offenders with a suspended or revoked license as a result of DUI convictions. The Hot Sheets may include the driver’s name, last known address, DOB, description, current license status, and the number of times suspended or revoked for DUI. DUI BOLOs should be updated and distributed to traffic and patrol officers at least monthly.  Implementation of the STEP grant activities will be accomplished by deploying personnel at high crash locations.
 Media RequirementsIssue a press release approved by the OTS PIO announcing the kick-off of the grant by November 15, but no sooner than October 1. The kick-off release must be approved by the OTS PIO and only distributed after the grant is fully signed and executed. If you are unable to meet the November 15 deadline to issue a kick-off press release, communicate reasons to your OTS coordinator and OTS PIO.

B. Phase 2 – Program Operations (Throughout Grant Year)  The department will work to create media opportunities throughout the grant period to call attention to the innovative program strategies and outcomes.

Media Requirements
The following requirements are for all grant-related activities:
 Send all media advisories, alerts, videos, graphics, artwork, posters, radio/PSA/video scripts, storyboards, digital and/or print educational materials for grant-related activities to the OTS PIO at [email protected] for approval and copy your OTS coordinator. Optimum lead time would be 7 days before the scheduled release but at least 3 business days prior to the scheduled release date for review and approval is appreciated.
 The OTS PIO is responsible for the approval of the design and content of materials. The agency understands OTS PIO approval is not authorizing approval of budget expenditure or cost. Any cost approvals must come from the Coordinator.
 Pre-approval is not required when using any OTS-supplied template for media advisories, press releases, social media graphics, videos or posts, or any other OTS-supplied educational material.

However, copy the OTS PIO at [email protected] and your OTS coordinator when any material is distributed to the media and public, such as a press release, educational material, or link to social media post. The OTS-supplied kick-off press release templates and any kickoff press releases are an exception to this policy and require prior approval before distribution to the media and public.
 If an OTS-supplied template, educational material, social media graphic, post or video is substantially changed, the changes shall be sent to the OTS PIO at [email protected] for approval and copy to your OTS Coordinator. Optimum lead time would be 7 days prior to the scheduled release date, but at least 3 business days prior to the scheduled release date for review and approval is appreciated.
 Press releases, social media posts and alerts on platforms such as NextDoor and Nixle reporting immediate and time-sensitive grant activities (e.g. enforcement operations, day of event highlights or announcements, event invites) are exempt from the OTS PIO approval process. The OTS PIO and your Coordinator should still be notified when the grant-related activity is happening (e.g. car seat checks, bicycle rodeos, community presentations, DUI checkpoints, etc.).
 Enforcement activities such as warrant and probation sweeps, court stings, etc. that are embargoed or could impact operations by publicizing in advance are exempt from the PIO approval process. However, announcements and results of activities should still be copied to the OTS PIO at [email protected] and your Coordinator with embargoed date and time or with “INTERNAL ONLY: DO NOT RELEASE” message in subject line of email. 8/16/2022 3:12:10 PM Page 6 of 16
 Any earned or paid media campaigns for TV, radio, digital or social media that are part of a specific grant objective, using OTS grant funds, or designed and developed using contractual services by a subgrantee, requires prior approval. Please send to the OTS PIO at [email protected] for approval and copy your grant coordinator at least 3 business days prior to the scheduled release date.
 Social media posts highlighting state or national traffic safety campaigns (Distracted Driving Month, Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month, etc.), enforcement operations (DUI checkpoints, etc.), or any other grant-related activity such as Bicycle rodeos, presentations, or events, are highly encouraged but do not require prior approval.
 Submit a draft or rough-cut of all digital, printed, recorded or video material (brochures, posters, scripts, artwork, trailer graphics, digital graphics, social posts connected to an earned or paid media campaign grant objective) to the OTS PIO at [email protected] and copy your OTS Coordinator for approval prior to the production or duplication.  Use the following standard language in all press, media, and printed materials, space permitting:

Funding for this program was provided by a grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety, through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.  Space permitting, include the OTS logo on all grant-funded print materials, graphics and paid or earned social media campaign grant objective; consult your OTS Coordinator for specifics, format-appropriate logos, or if space does not permit the use of the OTS logo.  Email the OTS PIO at [email protected] and copy your OTS Coordinator at least 21 days in advance, or when first confirmed, a short description of any significant grant-related traffic safety event or program, particularly events that are highly publicized beforehand with anticipated media coverage so OTS has sufficient notice to arrange for attendance and/or participation in the event.

If unable to attend, email the OTS PIO and coordinator brief highlights and/or results, including any media coverage (broadcast, digital, print) of event within 7 days following significant grantrelated event or program. Media and program highlights are to be reflected in QPRs.  Any press releases, work plans, scripts, storyboards, artwork, graphics, videos or any educational or informational materials that received PIO approval in a prior grant year needs to be resubmitted for approval in the current grant year.
 Contact the OTS PIO or your OTS Coordinator for consultation when changes from any of the above requirements might be warranted.

C. Phase 3 – Data Collection & Reporting (Throughout Grant Year)

1. Prepare and submit invoice claims (due January 30, April 30, July 30, and October 30)

2. Prepare and submit Quarterly Performance Reports (QPR) (due January 30, April 30, July 30, and October 30)
 Collect and report quarterly, appropriate data that supports the progress of goals and objectives.  Provide a brief list of activity conducted, procurement of grant-funded items, and significant media activities. Include status of grant-funded personnel, status of contracts, challenges, or special accomplishments.
 Provide a brief summary of quarterly accomplishments and explanations for objectives not completed or plans for upcoming activities.
 Collect, analyze and report statistical data relating to the grant goals and objectives.

4. METHOD OF EVALUATION
Using the data compiled during the grant, the Grant Director will complete the “Final Evaluation” section in the fourth/final Quarterly Performance Report (QPR). The Final Evaluation should provide a brief summary of the grant’s accomplishments, challenges and significant activities. This narrative should also include whether goals and objectives were met, exceeded, or an explanation of why objectives were not completed.

5. ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT
This program has full administrative support, and every effort will be made to continue the grant activities after grant conclusion.
8/16/2022 3:12:10 PM Page 7 of 16
State of California – Office of Traffic Safety

GRANT AGREEMENT
Schedule B

GRANT NUMBER
PT23161

FUND NUMBER CATALOG

NUMBER (CFDA)

FUND DESCRIPTION TOTAL AMOUNT
164AL-23 20.608 Minimum Penalties for Repeat
Offenders for Driving While
Intoxicated
$100,000.00
402PT-23 20.600 State and Community Highway
Safety
$75,000.00

COST CATEGORY FUND
NUMBER

UNIT COST OR
RATE

UNITS TOTAL COST TO
GRANT
A. PERSONNEL COSTS
Straight Time
$0.00
Overtime
DUI/DL Checkpoints 164AL-23 $6,400.00 2 $12,800.00
DUI Saturation Patrols 164AL-23 $1,916.00 35 $67,060.00 Collaborative DUI Enforcement 164AL-23 $1,916.00 7 $13,412.00 Traffic Enforcement 402PT-23 $1,916.00 8 $15,328.00
Distracted Driving 402PT-23 $1,916.00 7 $13,412.00
Pedestrian and Bicycle Enforcement 402PT-23 $1,277.00 4 $5,108.00 Collaborative Traffic Enforcement 402PT-23 $1,277.00 3 $3,831.00 Street Racing and Sideshow Enforcement
Operations
402PT-23 $1,277.00 4 $5,108.00
Category Sub-Total $136,059.00
B. TRAVEL EXPENSES
In State Travel 402PT-23 $6,565.00 1 $6,565.00
$0.00
Category Sub-Total $6,565.00
C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
$0.00
Category Sub-Total $0.00
D. EQUIPMENT
Changeable Message Sign Trailer with
Radar
402PT-23 $18,000.00 1 $18,000.00
Category Sub-Total $18,000.00
E. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
DUI Checkpoint Supplies 164AL-23 $6,728.00 1 $6,728.00
Radar Device 402PT-23 $2,758.00 1 $2,758.00
Lidar Device 402PT-23 $2,195.00 2 $4,390.00
Educational Materials 402PT-23 $500.00 1 $500.00
Category Sub-Total $14,376.00
F. INDIRECT COSTS
$0.00
Category Sub-Total $0.00
GRANT TOTAL $175,000.00
8/16/2022 3:12:10 PM Page 8 of 16
8/16/2022 3:12:10 PM Page 9 of 16
State of California – Office of Traffic Safety

GRANT AGREEMENT
Schedule B-1

GRANT NUMBER
PT23161

BUDGET NARRATIVE

PERSONNEL COSTS
DUI/DL Checkpoints - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

DUI Saturation Patrols - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel. A leading cause of collisions in Roseville is DUI. The Roseville Police Department is committed to the safety of the roadways and the community and will pursue fair but aggressive enforcement of California’s impaired driving laws. We are requesting money to cover additional labor house for DUI Saturation Patrol for enforcement of people driving under the influence of drugs and alcohol.

Collaborative DUI Enforcement - Overtime for grant funded Collaborative DUI Enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel
Traffic Enforcement - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Distracted Driving - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel. The primary cause of collisions in Roseville is speed. A significant contributing factor, although difficult to track, is distracted driving. Money to cover additional labor hours targeting speed, distracted driving/cell phone violations, seatbelt violations, and traffic enforcement around schools will have a direct effect on traffic safety. Staff can typically sustain increased enforcements averaging 5 hours of targeted enforcement in addition to their normal work hours Pedestrian and Bicycle Enforcement - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Collaborative Traffic Enforcement - Overtime for grant funded Collaborative Traffic Enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel
Street Racing and Sideshow Enforcement Operations - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

TRAVEL EXPENSES
In State Travel - Costs are included for appropriate staff to attend conferences and training events supporting the grant goals and objectives and/or traffic safety. Local mileage for grant activities and meetings is included. Anticipated travel may include POST Motorcycle Officer Update Training. All conferences, seminars or training not specifically identified in the Budget Narrative must be approved by OTS. All travel claimed must be at the agency approved rate. Per Diem may not be claimed for meals provided at conferences when registration fees are paid with OTS grant funds. Per Diem and lodging for eight officers to attend a two-day POST motorcycle officer update training.

CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
-

EQUIPMENT
Changeable Message Sign Trailer with Radar - Fully equipped changeable message sign trailer(s) with a radar device and digital display that is portable and fully programmable and will determine and display the speed of vehicles or post traffic safety information and messages during OTS funded operations. Radar trailers provide analytical data on when and where speed offenses are occurring. Radar trailers are deployed throughout the city based on community complaints. The trailers are moved weekly throughout the city. Traffic division motor officers are deployed to work problem areas with the highest speed numbers and times based on the data from the radar trailers. Currently, the Department has two trailers and is requesting two additional radar trailers through this grant. Roseville is a growing city and continues to develop land west and northwest of the city. It is estimated that the city will add 2,278 people each year for at least the next four years Adding two radar trailers to its fleet, will enable the traffic division to cover new areas of the city.

OTHER DIRECT COSTS
DUI Checkpoint Supplies - On-scene supplies needed to conduct sobriety checkpoints. Costs may include 28" traffic cones, MUTCD compliant traffic signs, MUTCD compliant high visibility vests (maximum of 10), traffic counters (maximum of 2), generator, gas for generators, lighting, reflective banners, electronic flares, 8/16/2022 3:12:10 PM Page 10 of 16
PAS Device/Calibration Supplies, heater, propane for heaters, fan, anti-fatigue mats, and canopies.

Additional items may be purchased if approved by OTS. The cost of food and beverages will not be reimbursed. Each item must have a unit cost of less than $5,000 (including tax and shipping).

Radar Device - To measure the speed of motor vehicles. This device will be used for speed enforcement.

The acquisition of a moving RADAR mounted in one patrol vehicle will enhance enforcement of speed violations. Additionally, this equipment can be used in training officers in RADAR/LIDAR use. Moving RADAR curriculum is required for all officers. Currently, the Department relies on CHP officers to instruct this class
Lidar Device - Light detection and ranging device used to measure the speed of motor vehicles. This device will be used for speed enforcement. Costs may include lidar devices, batteries, tax, and shipping. - Only the Traffic Division is outfitted with handheld Lidar units to work speed enforcement. The request of eight additional handheld Lidar units will be deployed to patrol officers to work speed enforcement with the goal of reducing speed-related crashes.

Educational Materials - Costs of purchasing, developing or printing brochures, pamphlets, fliers, coloring books, posters, signs, and banners associated with grant activities, and traffic safety conference and training materials. Items shall include a traffic safety message and if space is available the OTS logo. Additional items may be purchased if approved by OTS. Cost of purchasing, developing / printing, pamphlets, posters, signs, and banners associated with grant activities.

INDIRECT COSTS
-

STATEMENTS/DISCLAIMERS
There will be no program income generated from this grant.

Nothing in this “agreement” shall be interpreted as a requirement, formal or informal, that a particular law enforcement officer issue a specified or predetermined number of citations in pursuance of the goals and objectives here under.
8/16/2022 3:12:10 PM Page 11 of 16
State of California – Office of Traffic Safety

GRANT AGREEMENT
Exhibit A

GRANT NUMBER
PT23161

CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY GRANTS (23 U.S.C. Chapter 4; Sec. 1906, Pub. L. 109-59, As Amended By Sec. 4011, Pub. L. 114-94) The officials named on the grant agreement, certify by way of signature on the grant agreement signature page, that the Grantee Agency complies with all applicable Federal statutes, regulations, and directives and State rules, guidelines, policies, and laws in effect with respect to the periods for which it receives grant funding.

Applicable provisions include, but are not limited to, the following:

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
 23 U.S.C. Chapter 4 – Highway Safety Act of 1966, as amended  Sec. 1906, Pub. L. 109-59, as amended by Sec. 4011, Pub. L. 114-94  23 CFR part 1300 – Uniform Procedures for State Highway Safety Grant Programs  2 CFR part 200 – Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards
 2 CFR part 1201 – Department of Transportation, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards

NONDISCRIMINATION
(applies to all subrecipients as well as States)
The State highway safety agency will comply with all Federal statutes and implementing regulations relating to nondiscrimination (“Federal Nondiscrimination Authorities”). These include but are not limited to:
 Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq., 78 stat. 252), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin) and 49 CFR part 21;  The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, (42 U.S.C. 4601), (prohibits unfair treatment of persons displaced or whose property has been acquired because of Federal or Federal-aid programs and projects);  Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973, (23 U.S.C. 324 et seq.), and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C. 1681-1683 and 1685-1686) (prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex);
 Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, (29 U.S.C. 794 et seq.), as amended, (prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability) and 49 CFR part 27;  The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, (42 U.S.C. 6101 et seq.), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of age);
 The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, (Pub. L. 100-209), (broadens scope, coverage and applicability of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, by expanding the definition of the terms "programs or activities" to include all of the programs or activities of the Federal aid recipients, subrecipients and contractors, whether such programs or activities are Federally-funded or not);
 Titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. 12131-12189) (prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in the operation of public entities, public and private transportation systems, places of public accommodation, and certain testing) and 49 CFR parts 37 and 38;
 Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (prevents discrimination against minority populations by discouraging programs, policies, and activities with disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority and low-income populations); and  Executive Order 13166, Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency (guards against Title VI national origin discrimination/discrimination because of limited English proficiency (LEP) by ensuring that funding recipients take reasonable steps to ensure that LEP persons have meaningful access to programs (70 FR 74087-74100).

The Subgrantee-
8/16/2022 3:12:10 PM Page 12 of 16
 Will take all measures necessary to ensure that no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin, disability, sex, age, limited English proficiency, or membership in any other class protected by Federal Nondiscrimination Authorities, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any of its programs or activities, so long as any portion of the program is Federally-assisted;  Will administer the program in a manner that reasonably ensures that any of its subrecipients, contractors, subcontractors, and consultants receiving Federal financial assistance under this program will comply with all requirements of the Non- Discrimination Authorities identified in this Assurance;
 Agrees to comply (and require its subrecipients, contractors, subcontractors, and consultants to comply) with all applicable provisions of law or regulation governing US DOT’s or NHTSA’s access to records, accounts, documents, information, facilities, and staff, and to cooperate and comply with any program or compliance reviews, and/or complaint investigations conducted by US DOT or NHTSA under any Federal Nondiscrimination Authority;
 Acknowledges that the United States has a right to seek judicial enforcement with regard to any matter arising under these Non-Discrimination Authorities and this Assurance;  Agrees to insert in all contracts and funding agreements with other State or private entities the following clause:
o “During the performance of this contract/funding agreement, the contractor/funding recipient agrees—
a. To comply with all Federal nondiscrimination laws and regulations, as may be amended from time to time;
b. Not to participate directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by any Federal nondiscrimination law or regulation, as set forth in appendix B of 49 CFR part 2l and herein; c. To permit access to its books, records, accounts, other sources of information, and its facilities as required by the State highway safety office, US DOT or NHTSA; d. That, in event a contractor/funding recipient fails to comply with any nondiscrimination provisions in this contract/funding agreement, the State highway safety agency will have the right to impose such contract/agreement sanctions as it or NHTSA determine are appropriate, including but not limited to withholding payments to the contractor/funding recipient under the contract/agreement until the contractor/funding recipient complies; and/or cancelling, terminating, or suspending a contract or funding agreement, in whole or in part; and
e. To insert this clause, including paragraphs (a) through (e), in every subcontract and subagreement and in every solicitation for a subcontract or sub-agreement, that receives Federal funds under this program.

THE DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE ACT OF 1988 (41 U.S.C. 8103)
The Subgrantee will provide a drug-free workplace by:
a. Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition; b. Establishing a drug-free awareness program to inform employees about:

1. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;

2. The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;

3. Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs;

4. The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug violations occurring in the workplace;

5. Making it a requirement that each employee engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph (a); c. Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph (a) that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will –

1. Abide by the terms of the statement;

2. Notify the employer of any criminal drug statute conviction for a violation occurring in the workplace no later than five days after such conviction; d. Notifying the agency within ten days after receiving notice under subparagraph (c)(2) from an 8/16/2022 3:12:10 PM Page 13 of 16
employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction; e. Taking one of the following actions, within 30 days of receiving notice under subparagraph (c)(2), with respect to any employee who is so convicted –

1. Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination;

2. Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency;
f. Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation of all of the paragraphs above.

POLITICAL ACTIVITY (HATCH ACT)
(applies to all subrecipients as well as States)
The State will comply with provisions of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. 1501-1508), which limits the political activities of employees whose principal employment activities are funded in whole or in part with Federal funds.

CERTIFICATION REGARDING FEDERAL LOBBYING
(applies to all subrecipients as well as States)
Certification for Contracts, Grants, Loans, and Cooperative Agreements The signed certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:

1. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement;

2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions;

3. The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all sub-award at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grant, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

RESTRICTION ON STATE LOBBYING
(applies to all subrecipients as well as States)
None of the funds under this program will be used for any activity specifically designed to urge or influence a State or local legislator to favor or oppose the adoption of any specific legislative proposal pending before any State or local legislative body. Such activities include both direct and indirect (e.g., "grassroots") lobbying activities, with one exception. This does not preclude a State official whose salary is supported with NHTSA funds from engaging in direct communications with State or local legislative officials, in accordance with customary State practice, even if such communications urge legislative officials to favor or oppose the adoption of a specific pending legislative proposal.

CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION
(applies to all subrecipients as well as States)
8/16/2022 3:12:10 PM Page 14 of 16
Instructions for Primary Tier Participant Certification (States)

1. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective primary tier participant is providing the certification set out below and agrees to comply with the requirements of 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.

2. The inability of a person to provide the certification required below will not necessarily result in denial of participation in this covered transaction. The prospective primary tier participant shall submit an explanation of why it cannot provide the certification set out below. The certification or explanation will be considered in connection with the department or agency's determination whether to enter into this transaction. However, failure of the prospective primary tier participant to furnish a certification or an explanation shall disqualify such person from participation in this transaction.

3. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when the department or agency determined to enter into this transaction. If it is later determined that the prospective primary tier participant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency may terminate this transaction for cause or default or may pursue suspension or debarment.

4. The prospective primary tier participant shall provide immediate written notice to the department or agency to which this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective primary tier participant learns its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.

5. The terms covered transaction, civil judgment, debarment, suspension, ineligible, participant, person, principal, and voluntarily excluded, as used in this clause, are defined in 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.

You may contact the department or agency to which this proposal is being submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations.

6. The prospective primary tier participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency entering into this transaction.

7. The prospective primary tier participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include the clause titled “Instructions for Lower Tier Participant Certification” including the "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion—Lower Tier Covered Transaction,” provided by the department or agency entering into this covered transaction, without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions and will require lower tier participants to comply with 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.

8. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant is responsible for ensuring that its principals are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise ineligible to participate in covered transactions. To verify the eligibility of its principals, as well as the eligibility of any prospective lower tier participants, each participant may, but is not required to, check the System for Award Management Exclusions website (https://www.sam.gov/).

9. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of a participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.

10. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 6 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal government, the department or agency may terminate the transaction for cause or default.

Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters-Primary Tier Covered Transactions
(1) The prospective primary tier participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals:
(a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participating in covered transactions by any Federal department or agency; (b) Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment 8/16/2022 3:12:10 PM Page 15 of 16
rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; (c) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State or Local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (1)(b) of this certification; and
(d) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public transactions (Federal, State, or local) terminated for cause or default. (2) Where the prospective primary tier participant is unable to certify to any of the Statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.

Instructions for Lower Tier Participant Certification

1. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective lower tier participant is providing the certification set out below and agrees to comply with the requirements of 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.

2. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was entered into. If it is later determined that the prospective lower tier participant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension or debarment.

3. The prospective lower tier participant shall provide immediate written notice to the person to which this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective lower tier participant learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.

4. The terms covered transaction, civil judgment, debarment, suspension, ineligible, participant, person, principal, and voluntarily excluded, as used in this clause, are defined in 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.

You may contact the person to whom this proposal is submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations.

5. The prospective lower tier participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency with which this transaction originated.

6. The prospective lower tier participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include the clause titled “Instructions for Lower Tier Participant Certification” including the "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion – Lower Tier Covered Transaction," without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions and will require lower tier participants to comply with 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.

7. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant is responsible for ensuring that its principals are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise ineligible to participate in covered transactions. To verify the eligibility of its principals, as well as the eligibility of any prospective lower tier participants, each participant may, but is not required to, check the System for Award Management Exclusions website (https://www.sam.gov/).

8. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of a participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.

9. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 5 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension or debarment.
8/16/2022 3:12:10 PM Page 16 of 16
Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion -- Lower Tier Covered Transactions:

1. The prospective lower tier participant certifies, by submission of this proposal, that neither it nor its principals is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participating in covered transactions by any Federal department or agency.

2. Where the prospective lower tier participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.

BUY AMERICA ACT
(applies to all subrecipients as well as States)
The State and each subrecipient will comply with the Buy America requirement (23 U.S.C. 313) when purchasing items using Federal funds. Buy America requires a State, or subrecipient, to purchase with Federal funds only steel, iron and manufactured products produced in the United States, unless the Secretary of Transportation determines that such domestically produced items would be inconsistent with the public interest, that such materials are not reasonably available and of a satisfactory quality, or that inclusion of domestic materials will increase the cost of the overall project contract by more than 25 percent. In order to use Federal funds to purchase foreign produced items, the State must submit a waiver request that provides an adequate basis and justification for approval by the Secretary of Transportation.

PROHIBITION ON USING GRANT FUNDS TO CHECK FOR HELMET USAGE (applies to all subrecipients as well as States)
The State and each subrecipient will not use 23 U.S.C. Chapter 4 grant funds for programs to check helmet usage or to create checkpoints that specifically target motorcyclists.

POLICY ON SEAT BELT USE
In accordance with Executive Order 13043, Increasing Seat Belt Use in the United States, dated April 16, 1997, the Grantee is encouraged to adopt and enforce on-the-job seat belt use policies and programs for its employees when operating company-owned, rented, or personally-owned vehicles. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is responsible for providing leadership and guidance in support of this Presidential initiative. For information and resources on traffic safety programs and policies for employers, please contact the Network of Employers for Traffic Safety (NETS), a public-private partnership dedicated to improving the traffic safety practices of employers and employees. You can download information on seat belt programs, costs of motor vehicle crashes to employers, and other traffic safety initiatives at www.trafficsafety.org. The NHTSA website (www.nhtsa.gov) also provides information on statistics, campaigns, and program evaluations and references.

POLICY ON BANNING TEXT MESSAGING WHILE DRIVING
In accordance with Executive Order 13513, Federal Leadership On Reducing Text Messaging While Driving, and DOT Order 3902.10, Text Messaging While Driving, States are encouraged to adopt and enforce workplace safety policies to decrease crashes caused by distracted driving, including policies to ban text messaging while driving company-owned or rented vehicles, Government-owned, leased or rented vehicles, or privately-owned vehicles when on official Government business or when performing any work on or behalf of the Government. States are also encouraged to conduct workplace safety initiatives in a manner commensurate with the size of the business, such as establishment of new rules and programs or reevaluation of existing programs to prohibit text messaging while driving, and education, awareness, and other outreach to employees about the safety risks associated with texting while driving.

ORDINANCE NO. 6578

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCALYEAR 2022-23

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2022-23, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for acceptance of the California Office of Traffic Safety Grant Award funds.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the ordinance book, under the record of the ordinance, a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of such publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this _ day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2432
File #: 0323 & 0201-01
Title:

Communication Software Licensing - License Agreement Amendments and Budget Adjustment
Contact: Mark Peinado 916-774-5021 [email protected] Claudia Harlan 916-774-5003 [email protected]
Meeting Date: 12/7/2022
Item #: 6.30.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute two amendments to a license agreement with Tyler Technologies Inc., for the following items used by the Police and Fire Departments and provided by Tyler Technologies:

Encoder Interface to support the Fire Station Alerting System (FSAS) project CAD to Lenslock Body Worn Camera (BWC) Interface
Mobility - Crewforce / Shieldforce iOS application
Additionally, staff recommends that the City Council adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment in the amount of $33,691.

BACKGROUND
The City has a software licensing agreement with Tyler Technologies Inc. (formerly known as New World Systems), effective November 6, 2014, for the purchase and installation of a public safety computer system, including computer-aided dispatch, police records, fire records, mobile computing and field reporting, related interfaces and services, support and maintenance.

The Fire and Police Departments would like to amend the agreement to add additional services to the agreement.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Encoder interface cost of $3,720 is to be paid from the Fire Station Alerting System Replacement Project Capital Improvement Project. The Lenslock Body Worn Camera Interface is $14,400 to be paid from the Police Department's General Fund budget. Mobility Crewforce is $9,196 to be paid by the Fire Department's General Fund budget. The cost of the Mobility Shieldforce is $79,351; the Police Department has a credit of $45,660.33 with Tyler Technologies that will be applied to the invoice bringing the cost of Mobility Shieldforce to $33,690.67. The recommend budget adjustment will increase the software budget in the Supplemental Law Enforcement Fund by $33,691.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of amendments and budget adjustment meet the above criteria and are not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services
Respectfully Submitted,
Mark Peinado, Management Analyst
Troy Bergstrom, Police Chief
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-453
Amendment- Encoder Interface/Interface to Lenslock
Amendment- Shieldforce/Crewforce
Ordinance 6575
Budget Adjustment
RESOLUTION NO. 22-453

APPROVING AGREEMENT AMENDMENTS BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC.

WHEREAS, two Amendments, by and between the City of Roseville and Tyler Technologies Inc., for software and services, have been reviewed by the City Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Amendments are hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute them on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk
ORDINANCE NO. 6575

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCALYEAR 2022-23

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2022-23, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for communication software licensing.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the ordinance book, under the record of the ordinance, a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of such publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City ofRoseville, this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2434
File #: 0900-02-02-1 & 0201-01
Title:

Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Shop Building Office Addition Project – Budget Adjustment
Contact: Blaine Wiegel 916-746-1833 [email protected] Meeting Date: 12/7/2022
Item #: 6.31.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment for $200,000 in the Water, Wastewater, and Waste Services Operations Funds for the construction of three internal offices in the Shop Building at the Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant for staff shared among the Water, Wastewater, and Waste Services Utilities.

BACKGROUND
The Environmental Utilities Department (EU) requires three new offices at the Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant to house two Safety Coordinators and an EU Preventative Maintenance Supervisor. The total estimated cost of building these offices is $200,000. Since the Safety Coordinators will work for Water, Wastewater, and Waste Services, those utilities will all split the cost of two offices equally. The EU Preventative Maintenance Supervisor is a Wastewater position, so the Wastewater utility will bear the entire cost of the third office.

FISCAL IMPACT
The recommended budget adjustment requests the establishment of a new project, the Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Shop Building Addition. All three EU utilities (Water, Wastewater, and Waste Services) are sharing the cost of two of these offices since they will house staff in shared positions. The cost of the third office is for a Wastewater-only position and the Wastewater utility will bear the entire cost of the third office. The total cost of $200,000 for this new project will be funded as follows: (1) $44,445 will come from the available resources in the Water Operations Fund, (2) $44,445 will come from the Waste Services Operations Fund, and (3) $111,100 will come from already-appropriated budgets in the Dry Creek Wastewater Operations Fund and Pleasant Grove Operations Fund ($55,555 each). This means the net total increase in appropriations will be $88,890.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a budget adjustment meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Blaine Wiegel, Preventative Maintenance Coordinator
Richard Plecker, Environmental Utilities Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Ordinance 6576
ORDINANCE NO. 6576

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCALYEAR 2022-23

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2022-23, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for the Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Shop Building Office Addition project.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the ordinance book, under the record of the ordinance, a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of such publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City ofRoseville, this _ day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2405
File #: 0206-03-01 & 0201-01
Title: Hewlett Packard Campus Oaks Community Facilities District - Budget Adjustment Contact: Eric Dexter 916-746-1769 [email protected] Meeting Date: 12/7/2022
Item #: 6.32.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment in the amount of $40,000 for two items in the Hewlett Packard (HP) Campus Oaks Community Facilities District.

BACKGROUND
Additional landscape and park maintenance improvement work is needed in the HP Campus Oaks Community Facilities District (CFD). These projects include the replacement of concrete landscape edges to provide clear identification of property lines, and the addition of irrigation, plants and mulch to match existing landscapes. Another project addresses ADA compliance at a paseo, with the construction of a ramp at a mid-block crossing at Crimson Ridge Park.

FISCAL IMPACT
A budget adjustment in the amount of $40,000 is needed for improvement work in the Hewlett Packard (HP) Campus Oaks Community Facilities District: the replacement of concrete landscape edges to provide clear identification of property lines, and to add irrigation, plants and mulch to match existing landscapes for an estimated $20,000 and an additional project of $20,000 is to address ADA compliance at the paseo, with the construction of a ramp at a mid-block crossing at Crimson Ridge Park. There is sufficient fund balance in the HP Campus Oaks Community Facilities District to accommodate the recommended budget adjustment. There is no impact to General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a budget adjustment meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community
Goal E - Deliver exceptional City services
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Eric Dexter, Parks, Recreation & Libraries Superintendent Jill Geller, Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Ordinance 6574
Budget Adjustment
ORDINANCE NO. 6572

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCALYEAR 2022-23

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2022-23, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for improvement work within the Hewlett Packard Campus Oaks Community Facilities District.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the ordinance book, under the record of the ordinance, a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of such publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City ofRoseville, this _ day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk
11/9/20228:38 AM
1 REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
REQUESTER NAME & TITLE: Eric Dexter, Parks, Recreation & Libraries Superinte FISCAL YEAR: 2022-23 PREPARER NAME & TITLE: Rendi Hodge, Management Analyst II COUNCIL DATE (if applicable): 12/7/2022 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Parks, Recreation & Libraries ORDINANCE:

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT
BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
2120 5564 80251 000000 20,000
2120 5564 80251 000000 20,000
40,000

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
-
40,000

FUND BALANCE
BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
2120 (40,000)
(40,000)
Justification for Budget Adjustment:

REQUESTING DEPARTMENT HEAD / DESIGNEE DATE BUDGET MANAGER / DESIGNEE DATE

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER / DESIGNEE DATE CITY MANAGER / DESIGNEE DATE

POSTED BY DATE
Revised: June 24, 2019
TOTAL
TOTAL

ACCOUNT STRING

DESCRIPTION
Replacement of concrete edges for proper property lines in HP Campus Oaks CFD
Address ADA compliance at the paseo for mid-block crossing near Crimson Ridge Park (CO-62) in HP Campus Oaks CFD

NET ADJUSTMENT

ACCOUNT STRING

DESCRIPTION
HP Campus Oaks CFD fund balance
REQUIRED APPROVALS:

BUDGET DEPARTMENT USE ONLY:

The Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department is requesting a total of $40,000.00 from the HP Campus Oaks CFD Fund (2120). This request is for the replacement of concrete landscape edges to ensure clear identification of property lines, and to add irrigation, plants and mulch to match existing landscapes. The estimated cost of these improvements is $20,000.00. An additional budget adjustment of $20,000 is to address ADA compliance at the paseo, with the construction of a ramp at a mid-block crossing. There will be no General Fund impact.

ACCOUNT STRING
TOTAL

DESCRIPTION
11/09/2022

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2440
File #: 0400-04-12 & 0201-01
Title:

Sierra Vista Torrente Phase I CG-81 Trail Project - Reimbursement Agreement and Budget Adjustment
Contact: Suzanne Engelke 916-746-1289 [email protected] Meeting Date: 12/7/2022
Item #: 6.33.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute the Reimbursement Agreement for the Sierra Vista Torrente Phase I CG-81 Trail project between the City and Anthem United Torrente Homes Limited Partnership; and

2. Adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment in the amount of $100,117 to cover costs to construct the Sierra Vista Torrente Phase I CG-81 Class I Trail project within open space Parcel CG-81 of the Sierra Vista Specific Plan (SVSP).

BACKGROUND
Pursuant to the SVSP and Development Agreement, the developer, Anthem United Torrente Homes Limited Partnership, is responsible for installing a Class I trail in the Open Space area of Parcel CG-81. The trail was designed as part of the Sierra Vista Torrente Phase I plan set, EN21- 0679. Anthem United Torrente Homes Limited Partnership will pave the Class 1 trail in Parcel CG-81 and install post and cable fencing along the open space as required. The developer is requesting reimbursement for these improvements, also pursuant to the Development Agreement. When construction is complete, the trail will be maintained by the City.

FISCAL IMPACT
The developer, Anthem United Torrente Homes Limited Partnership, will pay up front costs for the construction of the trail at an estimated cost of $100,117. Reimbursement will be provided through bike trail development fees collected for SVSP. There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Development of the multi-use trail was previously evaluated in the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR, certified on May 19, 2010 and SCH NO - 2008032115 and identified in the Sierra Vista Specific Plan. Based on results of an initial study, construction of the bike trail is found to be within the project covered by the Sierra Vista Specific Plan Final EIR. As discussed in the Specific Plan EIR, the EIR provides environmental analysis of community infrastructure and facilities, including parks, pedestrian bridges, and bike trails, to the extent applicable. Because the project is consistent with the Sierra Vista Specific Plan Final EIR and Specific Plan, no new effects would be expected to occur and all applicable mitigation measures from the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR will be implemented during the design and construction of the Sierra Vista Specific Plan multi-use trail. Because the proposed project meets the requirements identified in the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, no additional CEQA review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Suzanne Engelke, Assistant Transportation Planner
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-456
Sierra Vista Reimbursement Agreement
Ordinance 6577
Budget Adjustment
RESOLUTION NO. 22-456

APPROVING A CITY/DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT, BY AND

BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND ANTHEM UNITED TORRENTE HOMES

LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT

ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, a City/Developer Reimbursement Agreement regarding the Sierra Vista Torrente Phase 1 CG-81 Trail Project, by and between the City of Roseville and Anthem United Torrente Homes Limited Partnership, has been reviewed by the City Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville; and
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

ORDINANCE NO. 6577

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCALYEAR 2022-23

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2022-23, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for the Sierra Vista Torrente Phase I CG-81 Trail Project.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the ordinance book, under the record of the ordinance, a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of such publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City ofRoseville, this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk
11/16/20224:26 PM
1 REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
REQUESTER NAME & TITLE: Ed Scofield, Alternative Transportation Manager FISCAL YEAR: 2022-23 PREPARER NAME & TITLE: Cameron Schreiter, Transportation Grants Analyst COUNCIL DATE (if applicable): 12/7/2022 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: PW / Alternative Transportation ORDINANCE:

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT
BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
3319 6587 84001 500316 100,117
100,117

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
-
100,117

FUND BALANCE
BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
3319 3601 0 (100,117)
(100,117)
Justification for Budget Adjustment:

REQUESTING DEPARTMENT HEAD / DESIGNEE DATE BUDGET MANAGER / DESIGNEE DATE

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER / DESIGNEE DATE CITY MANAGER / DESIGNEE DATE

POSTED BY DATE
Revised: June 24, 2019
TOTAL
TOTAL

ACCOUNT STRING

DESCRIPTION
Establish construction budget for the Sierra Vista Torrente Phase 1 CG-81 Trail
Reduce Neighborhood Park - Sierra Vista Fund Balance

NET ADJUSTMENT

ACCOUNT STRING

DESCRIPTION
REQUIRED APPROVALS:

BUDGET DEPARTMENT USE ONLY:

This budget adjustment is requested to establish project #500316 - Sierra Vista Torrente Phase I CG-81 Trail. This budget will pay for the reimbursement agreement with Anthem United Torrente Homes Limited Partnership to construct a Class I trail in Open Space Area Parcel CG-81. The funding for this trail project comes from fees collected in Fund 3319 - Neighborhood Park - Sierra Vista Fund Balance. There is no impact or cost to the General Fund for this project.

DESCRIPTION
TOTAL

ACCOUNT STRING

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2402
File #: 0400-04-12-01 & 0400-07
Title: Sierra Vista Parcels JM-30 and JM-41 - Final Map Contact: Robert Medina 916-774-5517 [email protected] Meeting Date: 12/7/2022
Item #: 6.34.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions:

Approve the final map on file with the City Clerk and accept, on behalf of the public, the easements offered thereon for dedication; and approve the abandonment of the easements listed thereon.

BACKGROUND
The Development Services - Engineering section has reviewed the subject final map and found that it is in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance and all conditions of the tentative map have been met.

This map will be creating 12 lots for future development at the southwest corner of Pleasant Grove Blvd and Fiddyment Rd.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the City's General Fund associated with this approval.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Approval of the Sierra Vista Parcels JM-30 and JM-41 final map is an action that is subject to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Project level CEQA compliance for the Sierra Vista Parcels JM-30 and JM-41 final map was accomplished with preparation of the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR (Adopted: May 5, 2010) (SCH#2008032017) and the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and associated Mitigation Monitoring Program approved by the City of Roseville on June 6, 2012. Because the Sierra Vista Parcels JM-30 and JM-41 final map is consistent with project evaluated in the Sierra Vista Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR), no new effects would be expected to occur and all applicable mitigation measures from the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR will be implemented. As such, no additional CEQA action is required at this time.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Robert Medina, Assistant Engineer
Mike Isom, Development Services Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Final Map
Vicinity Map

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2399
File #: 0400-04-15 & 0400-07
Title: Amoruso Ranch - Phase A1 (Large Lot) - Final Map Contact: Kerry Andrews 916-774-5346 [email protected] Meeting Date: 12/7/2022
Item #: 6.35.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions:

1. Approve the final map on file with the City Clerk and accept the public utility easements offered thereon, but reject at this time, on behalf of the public, all irrevocable offers of land, rights of way and easements offered thereon; and approve the abandonment of the rights of way and easements listed thereon.

BACKGROUND
The Development Services - Engineering Division has reviewed the subject final map and found that it is in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance and all conditions of the tentative map have been met.

This map will be creating 47 large lots for future development, 1 commercial lot, 1 public school lot, 1 public fire station lot, 8 public park lots, 16 public open space lots, 22 landscape lots, 1 community facilities lot, 1 public recycling lot, 2 sewer lift station lots, and 1 water facilities distribution lot.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the City's General Fund associated with this approval.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Approval of the Amoruso - Phase A1 final map is an action that is subject to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Project level CEQA compliance for the Amoruso - Phase A1 final map was accomplished with the preparation of the Amoruso Ranch Specific Plan (ARSP) Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and was certified by City Council on June 15, 2016 (SCH#2013102057). Because the Amoruso - Phase A1 final map is consistent with the project evaluated in the Amoruso Ranch Specific Plan EIR, no new effects would be expected to occur and all applicable mitigation measures from the Amoruso Ranch Specific Plan EIR will be implemented. As such, no additional CEQA action is required at this time.

Respectfully Submitted,
Kerry Andrews, Assistant Engineer
Mike Isom, Development Services Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Final Map
Vicinity Map

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE

RECORDER'S STATEMENT

OWNER'S STATEMENT

CITY CLERK'S STATEMENTSURVEYOR'S STATEMENTCITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT ANGELA EISENPRESS, SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THEAMORUSO FAMILY LIVING TRUST DATED MARCH 14, 2005 LAND
ES
I
OR F
P
EXP. 12/31/23
No. 8278

RVEYOR SU
A
N I

OF CAL I F

STATE OR
T IMOT Y G. BLAIR HONAL

BROOKFIELD SACRAMENTO HOLDINGS LLC,A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY

NOTARY'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Sheet of 28
NOVEMBER 2022

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760Sacramento, CA 95816 Fax 916.341.7767

A MERGER AND RE-SUBDIVISION OF THAT CERTAIN FINAL MAP ENTITLED "AMORUSO RANCH PHASE 1A", SUBDIVISION NO. PL18-0345,
BOOK EE OF MAPS, PAGE 93, O.R.P.C. LYING WITHIN
SECTIONS 11 AND 14, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN

CITY OF ROSEVILLE COUNTY OF PLACER STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FINAL MAP OF
AMORUSO RANCH - PHASE A1
SUBDIVISION NO. PL21-0184
1 NOTARY'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE
BENEFICIARY'S STATEMENT NOTES:

LEGEND
1 CERTIFICATE FOR DEDICATION
·
·
·
·
·
·
·

NOTARY'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Sheet of 28
NOVEMBER 2022

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760
Sacramento, CA 95816 Fax 916.341.7767

A MERGER AND RE-SUBDIVISION OF THAT CERTAIN FINAL MAP ENTITLED "AMORUSO RANCH PHASE 1A", SUBDIVISION NO. PL18-0345,
BOOK EE OF MAPS, PAGE 93, O.R.P.C. LYING WITHIN
SECTIONS 11 AND 14, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN

CITY OF ROSEVILLE COUNTY OF PLACER STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FINAL MAP OF
AMORUSO RANCH - PHASE A1
SUBDIVISION NO. PL21-0184
2 BASIS OF BEARINGS DETAIL : NOT TO SCALE

NOTARY'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT

BASIS OF BEARINGS STATEMENT
WEST

SUNSET BOULEVARD

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE
3 CORNER DESCRIPTIONS
REFERENCES:

FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED, ACCEPTED AS POSITION OF
SECTION CORNER/QUARTER CORNER AS SHOWN ON 22 RS 4CORNER ESTABLISHED PER RULES OF SUBDIVISION OF SECTION A
AB
B
A
A
A
A
A
A
B B B
A

SEE DETAIL 'A'

THIS SHEET

SEE DETAIL 'C'

THIS SHEET SEE DETAIL 'B' THIS SHEET
A
1"=40'

DETAIL 'B'
1"=40'

DETAIL 'C'
1"=40'
1 1
1 B

WEST SUNSET BOULEVARD
Sheet of 28
NOVEMBER 2022

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760Sacramento, CA 95816 Fax 916.341.7767

A MERGER AND RE-SUBDIVISION OF THAT CERTAIN FINAL MAP ENTITLED "AMORUSO RANCH PHASE 1A", SUBDIVISION NO. PL18-0345,
BOOK EE OF MAPS, PAGE 93, O.R.P.C. LYING WITHIN
SECTIONS 11 AND 14, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN

CITY OF ROSEVILLE COUNTY OF PLACER STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FINAL MAP OF
AMORUSO RANCH - PHASE A1
SUBDIVISION NO. PL21-0184

WEST SUNSET BOULEVARD

WEST SUNSET BOULEVARD

DETAIL 'A'

NOTARY'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE
5 8
6 7
9 10
11 12
13 14
16 15
17 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
27 26
28 18

WEST SUNSET BOULEVARD

FINAL MAP TENTATIVE MAP SPECIFIC PLAN
1 AR-1
2 AR-33 AR-604 AR-565 AR-706 AR-1007 AR-918 AR-999 AR-90 10 AR-98A
11 AR-98B
12 AR-413 AR-7114 AR-515 AR-616 AR-717 AR-6118 AR-4619 AR-8 20 AR-101
21 AR-94
22 AR-10223 AR-10424 AR-225 AR-1026 AR-6227 AR-5328 AR-3829 AR-4030 AR-39 31 AR-67
32 AR-2833 AR-1934 AR-77

FINAL MAP TENTATIVE MAP SPECIFIC PLAN
55 AR-7956 AR-3557 AR-6658 AR-3459 AR-8160 AR-11
61 AR-93
62 AR-9263 AR-10564 AR-5765 AR-6366 AR-10667 AR-2468 AR-37

FINAL MAP TENTATIVE MAP SPECIFIC PLAN
95 AR-11296 AR-11197 AR-10998 AR-5899 AR-59
100 AR-64A
101 AR-72B
A1-A LOT A1-A
A1-B LOT A1-B
A2-A LOT A2-A
A2-B LOT A2-B
A3 LOT A3
A4-A LOT A4-A
A4-B LOT A4-B
A4-C LOT A4-C
A5 LOT A5A6 LOT A6A7 LOT A7A8 LOT A8
A9-A LOT A9-A
A9-B LOT A9-B
A9-C LOT A9-C
A10 LOT A10
A11 LOT A11
LOT B NAPOTS 3 & 6
LOT C NAPOTS 2, 4 & 5LOT D NAPOTS 1
Sheet of 28 4
NOVEMBER 2022

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760Sacramento, CA 95816 Fax 916.341.7767

A MERGER AND RE-SUBDIVISION OF THAT CERTAIN FINAL MAP ENTITLED "AMORUSO RANCH PHASE 1A", SUBDIVISION NO. PL18-0345,
BOOK EE OF MAPS, PAGE 93, O.R.P.C. LYING WITHIN
SECTIONS 11 AND 14, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN

CITY OF ROSEVILLE COUNTY OF PLACER STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FINAL MAP OF
AMORUSO RANCH - PHASE A1
SUBDIVISION NO. PL21-0184
35 AR-1836 AR-1737 AR-7638 AR-2339 AR-16
40 AR-73
41 AR-15
42 AR-14
43 AR-13
44 AR-12
45 AR-7546 AR-2147 AR-2248 AR-2549 AR-2650 AR-30
51 AR-64B
52 AR-2753 AR-3154 AR-107
69 AR-9570 AR-97
71 AR-113
72 AR-5573 AR-4374 AR-4275 AR-10876 AR-5477 AR-4478 AR-4579 AR-3680 AR-52 81 AR-51
82 AR-3383 AR-3284 AR-8085 AR-5086 AR-7887 AR-10388 AR-989 AR-72A90 AR-74 91 AR-116
92 AR-11593 AR-11494 AR-96

GREEN FEATHER WAY GENTLE RAIN DRIVE

WESTBROOK BOULEVARD SADDLE CREEK WAY BLUE STAR DRIVE AMORUSO RANCH ROAD BLUE OPAL CIRCLE

WEST SUNSET BOULEVARD
±
±
±

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE
Sheet of 28 5
NOVEMBER 2022

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760Sacramento, CA 95816 Fax 916.341.7767

A MERGER AND RE-SUBDIVISION OF THAT CERTAIN FINAL MAP ENTITLED "AMORUSO RANCH PHASE 1A", SUBDIVISION NO. PL18-0345,
BOOK EE OF MAPS, PAGE 93, O.R.P.C. LYING WITHIN
SECTIONS 11 AND 14, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN

CITY OF ROSEVILLE COUNTY OF PLACER STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FINAL MAP OF
AMORUSO RANCH - PHASE A1
SUBDIVISION NO. PL21-0184

WEST SUNSET BOULEVARD
±
±
±
±

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE
Sheet of 28 6
NOVEMBER 2022

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760Sacramento, CA 95816 Fax 916.341.7767

A MERGER AND RE-SUBDIVISION OF THAT CERTAIN FINAL MAP ENTITLED "AMORUSO RANCH PHASE 1A", SUBDIVISION NO. PL18-0345,
BOOK EE OF MAPS, PAGE 93, O.R.P.C. LYING WITHIN
SECTIONS 11 AND 14, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN

CITY OF ROSEVILLE COUNTY OF PLACER STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FINAL MAP OF
AMORUSO RANCH - PHASE A1
SUBDIVISION NO. PL21-0184

WEST SUNSET BOULEVARD

WESTBROOK

BOULEVARD
± ±±
±

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE
Sheet of 28 7
NOVEMBER 2022

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760Sacramento, CA 95816 Fax 916.341.7767

A MERGER AND RE-SUBDIVISION OF THAT CERTAIN FINAL MAP ENTITLED "AMORUSO RANCH PHASE 1A", SUBDIVISION NO. PL18-0345,
BOOK EE OF MAPS, PAGE 93, O.R.P.C. LYING WITHIN
SECTIONS 11 AND 14, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN

CITY OF ROSEVILLE COUNTY OF PLACER STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FINAL MAP OF
AMORUSO RANCH - PHASE A1
SUBDIVISION NO. PL21-0184
±
±
±
±
±
±
±
±
±
±

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE
Sheet of 28 8
NOVEMBER 2022

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760Sacramento, CA 95816 Fax 916.341.7767

A MERGER AND RE-SUBDIVISION OF THAT CERTAIN FINAL MAP ENTITLED "AMORUSO RANCH PHASE 1A", SUBDIVISION NO. PL18-0345,
BOOK EE OF MAPS, PAGE 93, O.R.P.C. LYING WITHIN
SECTIONS 11 AND 14, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN

CITY OF ROSEVILLE COUNTY OF PLACER STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FINAL MAP OF
AMORUSO RANCH - PHASE A1
SUBDIVISION NO. PL21-0184

GREEN FEATHER WAY
±
±
±
±
±
±
±
±
±

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE
(RW/PS/LS)(PUE)
Sheet of 28 9
NOVEMBER 2022

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760Sacramento, CA 95816 Fax 916.341.7767

A MERGER AND RE-SUBDIVISION OF THAT CERTAIN FINAL MAP ENTITLED "AMORUSO RANCH PHASE 1A", SUBDIVISION NO. PL18-0345,
BOOK EE OF MAPS, PAGE 93, O.R.P.C. LYING WITHIN
SECTIONS 11 AND 14, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN

CITY OF ROSEVILLE COUNTY OF PLACER STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FINAL MAP OF
AMORUSO RANCH - PHASE A1
SUBDIVISION NO. PL21-0184

WESTBROOK BOULEVARD

AMORUSO RANCH ROAD

WESTBROOK BOULEVARD
±
±
±
±
±
±
±

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE
Sheet of 28 10
NOVEMBER 2022

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760Sacramento, CA 95816 Fax 916.341.7767

A MERGER AND RE-SUBDIVISION OF THAT CERTAIN FINAL MAP ENTITLED "AMORUSO RANCH PHASE 1A", SUBDIVISION NO. PL18-0345,
BOOK EE OF MAPS, PAGE 93, O.R.P.C. LYING WITHIN
SECTIONS 11 AND 14, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN

CITY OF ROSEVILLE COUNTY OF PLACER STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FINAL MAP OF
AMORUSO RANCH - PHASE A1
SUBDIVISION NO. PL21-0184
SEE DETAIL 'A'SHEET 7

GREEN FEATHER WAY
±
±
±
±
±
±
±
±
±
± ±

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE
Sheet of 28 11
NOVEMBER 2022

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760Sacramento, CA 95816 Fax 916.341.7767

A MERGER AND RE-SUBDIVISION OF THAT CERTAIN FINAL MAP ENTITLED "AMORUSO RANCH PHASE 1A", SUBDIVISION NO. PL18-0345,
BOOK EE OF MAPS, PAGE 93, O.R.P.C. LYING WITHIN
SECTIONS 11 AND 14, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN

CITY OF ROSEVILLE COUNTY OF PLACER STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FINAL MAP OF
AMORUSO RANCH - PHASE A1
SUBDIVISION NO. PL21-0184

GREEN FEATHER WAY
±
±
±
±
±
±
±

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE

PLACER PARKWAY
Sheet of 28 12
NOVEMBER 2022

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760Sacramento, CA 95816 Fax 916.341.7767

A MERGER AND RE-SUBDIVISION OF THAT CERTAIN FINAL MAP ENTITLED "AMORUSO RANCH PHASE 1A", SUBDIVISION NO. PL18-0345,
BOOK EE OF MAPS, PAGE 93, O.R.P.C. LYING WITHIN
SECTIONS 11 AND 14, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN

CITY OF ROSEVILLE COUNTY OF PLACER STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FINAL MAP OF
AMORUSO RANCH - PHASE A1
SUBDIVISION NO. PL21-0184

GREEN FEATHER WAY
±
±
±
±
±
±
±

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE

WESTBROOK BOULEVARD
Sheet of 28 13
NOVEMBER 2022

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760Sacramento, CA 95816 Fax 916.341.7767

A MERGER AND RE-SUBDIVISION OF THAT CERTAIN FINAL MAP ENTITLED "AMORUSO RANCH PHASE 1A", SUBDIVISION NO. PL18-0345,
BOOK EE OF MAPS, PAGE 93, O.R.P.C. LYING WITHIN
SECTIONS 11 AND 14, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN

CITY OF ROSEVILLE COUNTY OF PLACER STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FINAL MAP OF
AMORUSO RANCH - PHASE A1
SUBDIVISION NO. PL21-0184

AMORUSO RANCH ROAD

GREEN FEATHER WAY

WESTBROOK BOULEVARD

WESTBROOK BOULEVARD
±
±
±
±

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE
Sheet of 28 14
NOVEMBER 2022

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760Sacramento, CA 95816 Fax 916.341.7767

A MERGER AND RE-SUBDIVISION OF THAT CERTAIN FINAL MAP ENTITLED "AMORUSO RANCH PHASE 1A", SUBDIVISION NO. PL18-0345,
BOOK EE OF MAPS, PAGE 93, O.R.P.C. LYING WITHIN
SECTIONS 11 AND 14, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN

CITY OF ROSEVILLE COUNTY OF PLACER STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FINAL MAP OF
AMORUSO RANCH - PHASE A1
SUBDIVISION NO. PL21-0184

RAIN DRIVE
GENTLE

AMORUSO RANCH ROAD
±
±
±
±
±
±
±
±±
±

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE

PLACER PARKWAY
Sheet of 28 15
NOVEMBER 2022

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760Sacramento, CA 95816 Fax 916.341.7767

A MERGER AND RE-SUBDIVISION OF THAT CERTAIN FINAL MAP ENTITLED "AMORUSO RANCH PHASE 1A", SUBDIVISION NO. PL18-0345,
BOOK EE OF MAPS, PAGE 93, O.R.P.C. LYING WITHIN
SECTIONS 11 AND 14, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN

CITY OF ROSEVILLE COUNTY OF PLACER STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FINAL MAP OF
AMORUSO RANCH - PHASE A1
SUBDIVISION NO. PL21-0184

GREEN FEATHER WAY

AMORUSO RANCH ROAD

GREEN FEATHER WAY
±
±
±
±
±
±
±

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE
Sheet of 28 16
NOVEMBER 2022

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760Sacramento, CA 95816 Fax 916.341.7767

A MERGER AND RE-SUBDIVISION OF THAT CERTAIN FINAL MAP ENTITLED "AMORUSO RANCH PHASE 1A", SUBDIVISION NO. PL18-0345,
BOOK EE OF MAPS, PAGE 93, O.R.P.C. LYING WITHIN
SECTIONS 11 AND 14, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN

CITY OF ROSEVILLE COUNTY OF PLACER STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FINAL MAP OF
AMORUSO RANCH - PHASE A1
SUBDIVISION NO. PL21-0184
GREEN FEATHER WAY ± ±
±
±
±
±
±
±

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE
Sheet of 28 17
NOVEMBER 2022

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760Sacramento, CA 95816 Fax 916.341.7767

A MERGER AND RE-SUBDIVISION OF THAT CERTAIN FINAL MAP ENTITLED "AMORUSO RANCH PHASE 1A", SUBDIVISION NO. PL18-0345,
BOOK EE OF MAPS, PAGE 93, O.R.P.C. LYING WITHIN
SECTIONS 11 AND 14, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN

CITY OF ROSEVILLE COUNTY OF PLACER STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FINAL MAP OF
AMORUSO RANCH - PHASE A1
SUBDIVISION NO. PL21-0184

ROAD 'D'

GENTLE RAIN
DRIVE

GENTLE RAIN DRIVE

WESTBROOK BOULEVARD

GENTLE RAIN DRIVE
±
±
±
±
±
±
±
±

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE
Sheet of 28 18
NOVEMBER 2022

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760Sacramento, CA 95816 Fax 916.341.7767

A MERGER AND RE-SUBDIVISION OF THAT CERTAIN FINAL MAP ENTITLED "AMORUSO RANCH PHASE 1A", SUBDIVISION NO. PL18-0345,
BOOK EE OF MAPS, PAGE 93, O.R.P.C. LYING WITHIN
SECTIONS 11 AND 14, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN

CITY OF ROSEVILLE COUNTY OF PLACER STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FINAL MAP OF
AMORUSO RANCH - PHASE A1
SUBDIVISION NO. PL21-0184

AMORUSO RANCH ROAD

E CREEK WAY
±
±
±
±
±

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE

WESTBROOK BOULEVARD
Sheet of 28 19
NOVEMBER 2022

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760Sacramento, CA 95816 Fax 916.341.7767

A MERGER AND RE-SUBDIVISION OF THAT CERTAIN FINAL MAP ENTITLED "AMORUSO RANCH PHASE 1A", SUBDIVISION NO. PL18-0345,
BOOK EE OF MAPS, PAGE 93, O.R.P.C. LYING WITHIN
SECTIONS 11 AND 14, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN

CITY OF ROSEVILLE COUNTY OF PLACER STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FINAL MAP OF
AMORUSO RANCH - PHASE A1
SUBDIVISION NO. PL21-0184
GENTLE

RAIN DRIVE
±
±
±
±
±
±
±
±

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE
Sheet of 28 20
NOVEMBER 2022

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760Sacramento, CA 95816 Fax 916.341.7767

A MERGER AND RE-SUBDIVISION OF THAT CERTAIN FINAL MAP ENTITLED "AMORUSO RANCH PHASE 1A", SUBDIVISION NO. PL18-0345,
BOOK EE OF MAPS, PAGE 93, O.R.P.C. LYING WITHIN
SECTIONS 11 AND 14, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN

CITY OF ROSEVILLE COUNTY OF PLACER STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FINAL MAP OF
AMORUSO RANCH - PHASE A1
SUBDIVISION NO. PL21-0184 AMORUSO RANCH ROAD

AMORUSO

RANCH ROAD
±
±
±
±
±
±
±
±

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE
Sheet of 28 21
NOVEMBER 2022

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760Sacramento, CA 95816 Fax 916.341.7767

A MERGER AND RE-SUBDIVISION OF THAT CERTAIN FINAL MAP ENTITLED "AMORUSO RANCH PHASE 1A", SUBDIVISION NO. PL18-0345,
BOOK EE OF MAPS, PAGE 93, O.R.P.C. LYING WITHIN
SECTIONS 11 AND 14, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN

CITY OF ROSEVILLE COUNTY OF PLACER STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FINAL MAP OF
AMORUSO RANCH - PHASE A1
SUBDIVISION NO. PL21-0184

AMORUSO RANCH ROAD

GENTLE RAIN DRIVE

AMORUSO RANCH ROAD
GENTLE

RAIN DRIVE
±
±
±
±
±
±

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE
Sheet of 28 22
NOVEMBER 2022

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760Sacramento, CA 95816 Fax 916.341.7767

A MERGER AND RE-SUBDIVISION OF THAT CERTAIN FINAL MAP ENTITLED "AMORUSO RANCH PHASE 1A", SUBDIVISION NO. PL18-0345,
BOOK EE OF MAPS, PAGE 93, O.R.P.C. LYING WITHIN
SECTIONS 11 AND 14, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN

CITY OF ROSEVILLE COUNTY OF PLACER STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FINAL MAP OF
AMORUSO RANCH - PHASE A1
SUBDIVISION NO. PL21-0184

WESTBROOK BOULEVARD
±
±
±
±
±
±
±
±
±
±
±
±

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE

WESTBROOK BOULEVARD
Sheet of 28 23
NOVEMBER 2022

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760Sacramento, CA 95816 Fax 916.341.7767

A MERGER AND RE-SUBDIVISION OF THAT CERTAIN FINAL MAP ENTITLED "AMORUSO RANCH PHASE 1A", SUBDIVISION NO. PL18-0345,
BOOK EE OF MAPS, PAGE 93, O.R.P.C. LYING WITHIN
SECTIONS 11 AND 14, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN

CITY OF ROSEVILLE COUNTY OF PLACER STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FINAL MAP OF
AMORUSO RANCH - PHASE A1
SUBDIVISION NO. PL21-0184
SADDLE

CREEK WAY
±
±

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE
Sheet of 28 24
NOVEMBER 2022

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760Sacramento, CA 95816 Fax 916.341.7767

A MERGER AND RE-SUBDIVISION OF THAT CERTAIN FINAL MAP ENTITLED "AMORUSO RANCH PHASE 1A", SUBDIVISION NO. PL18-0345,
BOOK EE OF MAPS, PAGE 93, O.R.P.C. LYING WITHIN
SECTIONS 11 AND 14, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN

CITY OF ROSEVILLE COUNTY OF PLACER STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FINAL MAP OF
AMORUSO RANCH - PHASE A1
SUBDIVISION NO. PL21-0184

SADDLE CREEK WAY

AMORUSO RANCH ROAD
± ±
±
±
±
±
±
±
±

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE
Sheet of 28 25
NOVEMBER 2022

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760Sacramento, CA 95816 Fax 916.341.7767

A MERGER AND RE-SUBDIVISION OF THAT CERTAIN FINAL MAP ENTITLED "AMORUSO RANCH PHASE 1A", SUBDIVISION NO. PL18-0345,
BOOK EE OF MAPS, PAGE 93, O.R.P.C. LYING WITHIN
SECTIONS 11 AND 14, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN

CITY OF ROSEVILLE COUNTY OF PLACER STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FINAL MAP OF
AMORUSO RANCH - PHASE A1
SUBDIVISION NO. PL21-0184

DETAIL 'B'
1"=10'

SADDLE CREEK WAY

BLUE STAR DRIVE
±
±
±
±

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE
Sheet of 28 26
NOVEMBER 2022

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760Sacramento, CA 95816 Fax 916.341.7767

A MERGER AND RE-SUBDIVISION OF THAT CERTAIN FINAL MAP ENTITLED "AMORUSO RANCH PHASE 1A", SUBDIVISION NO. PL18-0345,
BOOK EE OF MAPS, PAGE 93, O.R.P.C. LYING WITHIN
SECTIONS 11 AND 14, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN

CITY OF ROSEVILLE COUNTY OF PLACER STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FINAL MAP OF
AMORUSO RANCH - PHASE A1
SUBDIVISION NO. PL21-0184

BLUE STAR DRIVE

SADDLE CREEK WAY

WESTBROOK BOULEVARD

AMORUSO RANCH ROAD
± ±
±
±
±

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE
Sheet of 28 27
NOVEMBER 2022

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760Sacramento, CA 95816 Fax 916.341.7767

A MERGER AND RE-SUBDIVISION OF THAT CERTAIN FINAL MAP ENTITLED "AMORUSO RANCH PHASE 1A", SUBDIVISION NO. PL18-0345,
BOOK EE OF MAPS, PAGE 93, O.R.P.C. LYING WITHIN
SECTIONS 11 AND 14, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN

CITY OF ROSEVILLE COUNTY OF PLACER STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FINAL MAP OF
AMORUSO RANCH - PHASE A1
SUBDIVISION NO. PL21-0184

SEE DETAIL 'A'

WESTBROOK BOULEVARD
±
± ±
±
±
±
±
±
±
±

BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE
Sheet of 28 28
NOVEMBER 2022

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760Sacramento, CA 95816 Fax 916.341.7767

A MERGER AND RE-SUBDIVISION OF THAT CERTAIN FINAL MAP ENTITLED "AMORUSO RANCH PHASE 1A", SUBDIVISION NO. PL18-0345,
BOOK EE OF MAPS, PAGE 93, O.R.P.C. LYING WITHIN
SECTIONS 11 AND 14, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN

CITY OF ROSEVILLE COUNTY OF PLACER STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FINAL MAP OF
AMORUSO RANCH - PHASE A1
SUBDIVISION NO. PL21-0184

SADDLE CREEK WAY

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2442
File #: 0600-01
Title: Staffing Changes
Contact: Linda Hampton 916-774-5215 [email protected] Meeting Date: 12/7/2022
Item #: 6.36.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
As part of an ongoing assessment of the appropriate staffing structure to provide a high level of service to the community, staff is recommending changes to the City’s staffing allocation schedule. Staff recommends that City Council approve the attached citywide allocation schedule effective December 24, 2022 reflecting the reclassification of four vacant positions, the addition of one new Permit Technician position and the deletion of one Police Records Clerk.

BACKGROUND
As part of the Municipal Code, the Human Resources Department is charged with maintaining the City’s classification plan. The Human Resources staff is continually evaluating staffing levels necessary to provide high service levels to the community. Staff reviews department workload and the allocation’s impact on meeting the city’s goals. Additionally, the level at which each of these positions would have to be staffed was analyzed. Based on the analysis, staff is recommending the following staffing changes.

Environmental Utilities Department
As part of ongoing restructure efforts staff is requesting the reclassification of a vacant Hydrogeologist position and a 1,500 hour temporary Engineering Technician position to fund a new Water Utility Manager position. Staff is also requesting to reclassify a vacant Senior Engineer to a Principal Engineer position in the Water utility.

From To
Current
Salary &
Benefits
Proposed
Salary &
Benefits
Annual
Impact *
Impact
for
remaining
FY 2022-
23 Hydrogeologist and 1,500 Hour Temporary Engineering Technician Water Utility
Manager
$308,757 $268,639 -$40,118 -$20,059
Senior Engineer Principal
Engineer
$212,256 $238,783 $26,527 $13,264
-$13,591 -$6,795
*This amount includes the estimated annual pension savings of $2,076.

Development Services
Staff requests to reclassify a vacant Construction Inspector I/II position to a Development Technician I/II position. Staff also requests to add a new Permit Technician I/II position. As the city continues to grow, these positions will provide support and respond to the increasing needs of the public and development community.

From To
Current
Salary &
Benefits
Proposed
Salary &
Benefits
Annual
Impact *
Impact for
remaining
FY 2022-23
Construction
Inspector I/II
Development
Technician I/II
$138,167 $112,624 -$25,543 -$12,772
Permit
Technician I/II
$111,412 $111,412 $55,706
$85,869 $42,934
*This amount includes the estimated annual pension cost of $6,007.

Finance
Staff requests to reclassify a vacant Courier position to a Warehouse Worker I/II position. This will allow greater flexibility in assigning a broader scope of work and create efficiencies.

From To
Current
Salary &
Benefits
Proposed
Salary &
Benefits
Annual
Impact *
Impact for
remaining
FY 2022-23
Courier Warehouse
Worker I/II
$74,970 $98,212 $23,242 $11,621
$23,242 $11,621
*This amount includes the estimated annual pension cost of $1,626.

Police
At a prior City Council meeting, Council approved adding a Senior Police Records Clerk position. The position was to be filled through a promotional recruitment with the resulting vacancy deleted from the Police Department position allocation schedule. With the promotional recruitment now concluded, staff is requesting the deletion of the vacated Police Records Clerk I/II position.

FISCAL IMPACT
Environmental Utilities Department
The EU Department salary savings in the Water utility will be $6,795 for the remainder of fiscal year (FY) 2022-23.

Development Services
The General Fund fiscal impact of $42,934 for the remainder of FY2022-23 will be fully offset by additional revenues. The ongoing cost of $85,869 will be incorporated in the proposed FY2023-24 budget.

Finance
The General Fund fiscal impact of $11,621 for the remainder of FY2022-23 will be fully offset from salary savings. The ongoing cost of $23,242 will be incorporated in the proposed FY2023-24 budget.

Police
The fiscal impact has already been accounted for with the approval of the promotional opportunity.

The total impact to the General Fund for the remainder of FY2022-23 is $54,555. The estimated savings to the Water Operations Fund for the remainder of FY2022-23 is $6,795.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The proposed staffing changes meet the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Linda Hampton, Human Resources Manager
Stacey Peterson, Human Resources Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
2022-12-10 Citywide PositionAllocation Schedule
Position Allocation Control Report Effective: 12‐10‐22
Position Code Position Title Allocated FTE
CAO220245001 Assistant City Attorney 1
CAO221200001 City Attorney 1
CAO221658002 Deputy City Attorney I/II 1
CAO221658001 Deputy City Attorney I/II 1
CAO224096002 Legal Clerk I/II 1
CAO224096001 Legal Clerk I/II 1
CAO225015001 Paralegal 1
CAO227123003 Senior Deputy City Attorney 1
CAO227123002 Senior Deputy City Attorney 1
CAO227123001 Senior Deputy City Attorney 1
Total for Department: CAO City Attorney 10
Position Code Position Title Allocated FTE
CCD360250001 Assistant City Clerk 1
CCD361220001 City Clerk 1
CCD361227005 City Clerk Technician I/II 1
CCD361227004 City Clerk Technician I/II 1
CCD361227003 City Clerk Technician I/II 1
CCD361227002 City Clerk Technician I/II 1
CCD361227001 City Clerk Technician I/II 1
CCD361665002 Deputy City Clerk I/ll 1
CCD361665001 Deputy City Clerk I/ll 1
CCD369548006 Passport/Livescan Agent 0.5
CCD369548004 Passport/Livescan Agent 0.5
CCD369548002 Passport/Livescan Agent 1
CCD369548001 Passport/Livescan Agent 1
Total for Department: CCD City Clerk
Department
12 Position Code Position Title Allocated FTE
CMO140325002 Assistant City Manager 1
CMO140325001 Assistant City Manager 1
CMO141240001 City Manager 1
CMO142551002 Executive Assistant 1
CMO142551001 Executive Assistant 1
CMO1414449001 Management Analyst ‐ City Manager 1
CMO144457001 Management Assistant I/II 1
Total for Department: CMO City Manager 7
Position Code Position Title Allocated FTE
DSD660071001 Administrative Assistant 1
DSD660084001 Administrative Technician 1
DSD661005005 Associate (PE)/Assistant/Junior Engineer 1 DSD661005004 Associate (PE)/Assistant/Junior Engineer 1 DSD661005003 Associate (PE)/Assistant/Junior Engineer 1 DSD661005002 Associate (PE)/Assistant/Junior Engineer 1 DSD661005001 Associate (PE)/Assistant/Junior Engineer 1 DSD660820003 Associate Engineer 1
DSD660820001 Associate Engineer 1
DSD660900006 Associate/Assistant Planner 1
DSD660900005 Associate/Assistant Planner 1
DSD660900004 Associate/Assistant Planner 1
DSD660900003 Associate/Assistant Planner 1
DSD660900002 Associate/Assistant Planner 1
DSD660900001 Associate/Assistant Planner 1
DSD661017001 Building Inspection Supervisor 1
DSD661019008 Building Inspector I/II 1
DSD661019007 Building Inspector I/II 1
DSD661019006 Building Inspector I/II 1
DSD661019005 Building Inspector I/II 1
DSD661019004 Building Inspector I/II 1
DSD661019003 Building Inspector I/II 1
DSD661019002 Building Inspector I/II 1
DSD661019001 Building Inspector I/II 1
DSD661043001 Building Official 1
DSD661047004 Building Plans Examiner I/II 1
DSD661047003 Building Plans Examiner I/II 1
DSD661047002 Building Plans Examiner I/II 1
DSD661047001 Building Plans Examiner I/II 1
DSD661369005 Code Enforcement Inspector I/II 1
DSD661369004 Code Enforcement Inspector I/II 1
DSD661369003 Code Enforcement Inspector I/II 1
DSD661369002 Code Enforcement Inspector I/II 1
DSD661369001 Code Enforcement Inspector I/II 1
DSD661368001 Code Enforcement Supervisor 1
DSD661027001 Construction Inspection Superintendent 1
DSD661248001 Construction Inspection Supervisor 1
DSD661434005 Construction Inspector I/II 1
DSD661434004 Construction Inspector I/II 1
DSD661434003 Construction Inspector I/II 1
DSD661434002 Construction Inspector I/II 1
DSD661434001 Construction Inspector I/II 1
DSD661280001 Development Services Administrator 1
DSD661096002 Development Services Business Analyst I/II 1 DSD661096001 Development Services Business Analyst I/II 1 DSD661676001 Development Services Director 1
DSD661695001 Development Services Manager 1
DSD661672004 Development Technician I/II 1
DSD661672003 Development Technician I/II 1
DSD661672002 Development Technician I/II 1
DSD661672001 Development Technician I/II 1
DSD661277001 Engineering Manager 1
DSD662540001 Environmental Coordinator 1
DSD663412001 GIS Analyst I/II 1
DSD662214001 GIS Technician I/II 1
DSD660050001 Management Analyst I/II 1
DSD664957002 Office Assistant I/II 1
DSD664957001 Office Assistant I/II 1
DSD665279004 Permit Technician I/II 1
DSD665279003 Permit Technician I/II 1
DSD665279002 Permit Technician I/II 1
DSD665279001 Permit Technician I/II 1
DSD661501001 Permits Supervisor 1
DSD665309001 Planning Manager 1
DSD665514001 Principal Engineer 1
DSD667117001 Senior Building Inspector 1
DSD667195001 Senior Building Plans Examiner 1
DSD667121002 Senior Construction Inspector 1
DSD667121001 Senior Construction Inspector 1
DSD661097001 Senior Development Services Business Analyst 1 DSD667142003 Senior Engineer 1
DSD667142002 Senior Engineer 1
DSD661502001 Senior Permits Technician 1
DSD667180002 Senior Planner 1
DSD667180001 Senior Planner 1
Total for Department: DSD Development
Services Department
75 Position Code Position Title Allocated FTE
EDD541675001 Economic Development Analyst I/II 1
EDD541710001 Economic Development Director 1
EDD541001002 Economic Development Project Manager 1
EDD541001001 Economic Development Project Manager 1
EDD543402003 Housing Analyst I/II 1
EDD543402002 Housing Analyst I/II 1
EDD543402001 Housing Analyst I/II 1
EDD543589001 Housing Manager 1
EDD543590001 Housing Supervisor 1
EDD543592004 Housing Technician I/II 1
EDD543592003 Housing Technician I/II 1
EDD543592002 Housing Technician I/II 1
EDD543592001 Housing Technician I/II 1
EDD540050001 Management Analyst I/II 1
EDD544957001 Office Assistant I/II 1
EDD547148001 Senior Housing Technician 1
Total for Department: EDD Economic
Development
Department
16 Position Code Position Title Allocated FTE
ELE701505001 AMI Project Manager 1
ELE700071001 Administrative Assistant 1
ELE700084005 Administrative Technician 1
ELE700084003 Administrative Technician 1
ELE700084002 Administrative Technician 1
ELE700084001 Administrative Technician 1
ELE700395003 Assistant Electric Utility Director 1
ELE700395002 Assistant Electric Utility Director 1
ELE700395001 Assistant Electric Utility Director 1
ELE701067008 Associate/Assistant Electric Analyst 1
ELE701067007 Associate/Assistant Electric Analyst 1
ELE701067006 Associate/Assistant Electric Analyst 1
ELE701067005 Associate/Assistant Electric Analyst 1
ELE701067004 Associate/Assistant Electric Analyst 1
ELE701067003 Associate/Assistant Electric Analyst 1
ELE701067002 Associate/Assistant Electric Analyst 1
ELE701067001 Associate/Assistant Electric Analyst 1
ELE701548002 Data Management Specialist I/II 1
ELE701548001 Data Management Specialist I/II 1
ELE701645001 Department Public Information Officer 1
ELE701312008 Electric Business Analyst I/II 1
ELE701312006 Electric Business Analyst I/II 1
ELE701312004 Electric Business Analyst I/II 1
ELE701312003 Electric Business Analyst I/II 1
ELE701312002 Electric Business Analyst I/II 1
ELE701312001 Electric Business Analyst I/II 1
ELE701312007 Electric Business Analyst I/II 1
ELE702335002 Electric Compliance Analyst I/II 1
ELE702335001 Electric Compliance Analyst I/II 1
ELE706285001 Electric Customer Programs Supervisor 1
ELE702330002 Electric Drafting Technician I/II 1
ELE702345005 Electric Engineering Technician I/II 1
ELE702345004 Electric Engineering Technician I/II 1
ELE702345003 Electric Engineering Technician I/II 1
ELE702345001 Electric Engineering Technician I/II 1
ELE702284001 Electric Engineering Technician Supervisor 1 ELE702286003 Electric Line Troubleshooter 1
ELE702286002 Electric Line Troubleshooter 1
ELE702286001 Electric Line Troubleshooter 1
ELE702212004 Electric Materials Technician I/II 1
ELE702212003 Electric Materials Technician I/II 1
ELE702212002 Electric Materials Technician I/II 1
ELE702212001 Electric Materials Technician I/II 1
ELE702338001 Electric Operations Manager 1
ELE702339002 Electric Operations Supervisor 1
ELE702339001 Electric Operations Supervisor 1
ELE702254001 Electric Preventive Data System Technician 1 ELE702316005 Electric Resources Planner I/II 1
ELE702316003 Electric Resources Planner I/II 1
ELE702316002 Electric Resources Planner I/II 1
ELE702316001 Electric Resources Planner I/II 1
ELE702216001 Electric Risk and Compliance Supervisor 1
ELE702319001 Electric Substation Supervisor 1
ELE702350003 Electric System Dispatcher 1
ELE702350002 Electric System Dispatcher 1
ELE702350001 Electric System Dispatcher 1
ELE702359003 Electric Technology System Technician 1
ELE702359002 Electric Technology System Technician 1
ELE702359001 Electric Technology System Technician 1
ELE709560001 Electric Technology Systems Administrator 1 ELE702320001 Electric Utility Director 1
ELE702215001 Electric Utility Financial Administrator 1 ELE709250003 Electric Utility Inspection Technician 1
ELE709250002 Electric Utility Inspection Technician 1
ELE709250001 Electric Utility Inspection Technician 1
ELE702285015 Electric/Apprentice Line Technician 1
ELE702285014 Electric/Apprentice Line Technician 1
ELE702285013 Electric/Apprentice Line Technician 1
ELE702285012 Electric/Apprentice Line Technician 1
ELE702285011 Electric/Apprentice Line Technician 1
ELE702285010 Electric/Apprentice Line Technician 1
ELE702285009 Electric/Apprentice Line Technician 1
ELE702285008 Electric/Apprentice Line Technician 1
ELE702285007 Electric/Apprentice Line Technician 1
ELE702285006 Electric/Apprentice Line Technician 1
ELE702285005 Electric/Apprentice Line Technician 1
ELE702285004 Electric/Apprentice Line Technician 1
ELE702285003 Electric/Apprentice Line Technician 1
ELE702285002 Electric/Apprentice Line Technician 1
ELE702285001 Electric/Apprentice Line Technician 1
ELE701085005 Electric/Apprentice Metering System Technician 1 ELE701085004 Electric/Apprentice Metering System Technician 1 ELE701085003 Electric/Apprentice Metering System Technician 1 ELE701085002 Electric/Apprentice Metering System Technician 1 ELE701085001 Electric/Apprentice Metering System Technician 1 ELE701083012 Electric/Apprentice Substation Technician 1 ELE701083011 Electric/Apprentice Substation Technician 1 ELE701083010 Electric/Apprentice Substation Technician 1 ELE701083009 Electric/Apprentice Substation Technician 1 ELE701083008 Electric/Apprentice Substation Technician 1 ELE701083007 Electric/Apprentice Substation Technician 1 ELE701083006 Electric/Apprentice Substation Technician 1 ELE701083005 Electric/Apprentice Substation Technician 1 ELE701083004 Electric/Apprentice Substation Technician 1 ELE701083003 Electric/Apprentice Substation Technician 1 ELE701083002 Electric/Apprentice Substation Technician 1 ELE701083001 Electric/Apprentice Substation Technician 1 ELE702466003 Energy Program Technician 1
ELE702466002 Energy Program Technician 1
ELE702501003 Energy Services Account Representative I/II 1 ELE702501002 Energy Services Account Representative I/II 1 ELE702501001 Energy Services Account Representative I/II 1 ELE701082001 Generation Maintenance Scheduler‐Coordinator 1 ELE701648001 Government Relations Representative I/II 1 ELE703608003 Instrument and Control Technician 1
ELE703608002 Instrument and Control Technician 1
ELE703608001 Instrument and Control Technician 1
ELE704517002 Marketing and Communication Analyst I/II 0.5 ELE704517001 Marketing and Communication Analyst I/II 1 ELE704540003 Meter Reader 1
ELE704540002 Meter Reader 1
ELE704540001 Meter Reader 1
ELE704534001 Meter Service Worker 1
ELE704957004 Office Assistant I/II 1
ELE704957003 Office Assistant I/II 1
ELE704957002 Office Assistant I/II 1
ELE704957001 Office Assistant I/II 1
ELE705596004 Power Engineer I/II 1
ELE705596003 Power Engineer I/II 1
ELE705596002 Power Engineer I/II 1
ELE705596001 Power Engineer I/II 1
ELE705505001 Power Engineering Manager 1
ELE705600001 Power Generation Superintendent 1
ELE705591002 Power Plant Engineer I/II 1
ELE705591001 Power Plant Engineer I/II 1
ELE705526003 Power Plant Mechanic 1
ELE705526002 Power Plant Mechanic 1
ELE705526001 Power Plant Mechanic 1
ELE705530002 Power Plant Operations and Maintenance Supervisor 1 ELE705530001 Power Plant Operations and Maintenance Supervisor 1 ELE705523009 Power Plant Operator Technician I/II 1
ELE705523008 Power Plant Operator Technician I/II 1
ELE705523007 Power Plant Operator Technician I/II 1
ELE705523006 Power Plant Operator Technician I/II 1
ELE705523005 Power Plant Operator Technician I/II 1
ELE705523004 Power Plant Operator Technician I/II 1
ELE705523003 Power Plant Operator Technician I/II 1
ELE705523002 Power Plant Operator Technician I/II 1
ELE705523001 Power Plant Operator Technician I/II 1
ELE705535001 Power Supply and Portfolio Administrator 1 ELE707128004 Senior Electric Business Analyst 1
ELE707128003 Senior Electric Business Analyst 1
ELE707128002 Senior Electric Business Analyst 1
ELE707128001 Senior Electric Business Analyst 1
ELE707118005 Senior Electric Line Technician 1
ELE707118004 Senior Electric Line Technician 1
ELE707118003 Senior Electric Line Technician 1
ELE707118002 Senior Electric Line Technician 1
ELE707118001 Senior Electric Line Technician 1
ELE707169001 Senior Electric Materials Technician 1
ELE701036001 Senior Electric Metering Systems Technician 1 ELE707126003 Senior Electric Substation Technician 1
ELE707126002 Senior Electric Substation Technician 1
ELE707126001 Senior Electric Substation Technician 1
ELE707168001 Senior Electric System Dispatcher 1
ELE701023001 Senior Electric Technology Systems Analyst 1 ELE707163002 Senior Energy Services Account Representative 1 ELE707163001 Senior Energy Services Account Representative 1 ELE707161001 Senior GIS Analyst 1
ELE707200001 Senior Meter Service Worker 1
ELE707151002 Senior Power Engineer 1
ELE707151001 Senior Power Engineer 1
ELE705555001 Senior Power Plant Engineer 1
ELE707152004 Senior Power Plant Operator Technician 1
ELE707152003 Senior Power Plant Operator Technician 1
ELE707152002 Senior Power Plant Operator Technician 1
ELE707152001 Senior Power Plant Operator Technician 1
ELE701029002 Senior Utility Billing Analyst 1
ELE701029001 Senior Utility Billing Analyst 1
ELE701103001 Senior Utility Billing Customer Service Field Representative 1 ELE701044003 Senior Utility Customer Service Specialist 1 ELE701044002 Senior Utility Customer Service Specialist 1 ELE701044001 Senior Utility Customer Service Specialist 1 ELE703315005 Utility Billing Analyst I/II 1
ELE703315004 Utility Billing Analyst I/II 1
ELE703315003 Utility Billing Analyst I/II 1
ELE703315002 Utility Billing Analyst I/II 1
ELE703315001 Utility Billing Analyst I/II 1
ELE701104001 Utility Billing Customer Service Field Rep I/II 1 ELE70920001 Utility Billing Operations Manager 1
ELE701041001 Utility Billing and Field Services Supervisor 1 ELE701049015 Utility Customer Service Representative I/II 1 ELE701049014 Utility Customer Service Representative I/II 1 ELE701049013 Utility Customer Service Representative I/II 1 ELE701049012 Utility Customer Service Representative I/II 1 ELE701049011 Utility Customer Service Representative I/II 0.75 ELE701049010 Utility Customer Service Representative I/II 0.5 ELE701049009 Utility Customer Service Representative I/II 1 ELE701049008 Utility Customer Service Representative I/II 0.5 ELE701049007 Utility Customer Service Representative I/II 1 ELE701049006 Utility Customer Service Representative I/II 1 ELE701049005 Utility Customer Service Representative I/II 1 ELE701049004 Utility Customer Service Representative I/II 1 ELE701049001 Utility Customer Service Representative I/II 1 ELE701046005 Utility Customer Service Specialist I/II 1 ELE701046004 Utility Customer Service Specialist I/II 1 ELE701046003 Utility Customer Service Specialist I/II 1 ELE701046002 Utility Customer Service Specialist I/II 1 ELE701046001 Utility Customer Service Specialist I/II 1 ELE701042001 Utility Customer Service Supervisor 1
ELE701646001 Utility Government Relations Administrator 1 Total for Department: ELE Electric Department 199.25*
*2 positions will be eliminated after promotion process has been completed Position Code Position Title Allocated FTE
EUD740071001 Administrative Assistant 1
EUD741003001 Administrative Supervisor 1
EUD740084004 Administrative Technician 1
EUD740084003 Administrative Technician 1
EUD740084002 Administrative Technician 1
EUD740084001 Administrative Technician 1
EUD740411003 Assistant Environmental Utilities Director 1 EUD740411001 Assistant Environmental Utilities Director 1 EUD741005002 Associate (PE)/Assistant/Junior Engineer 1 EUD741005001 Associate (PE)/Assistant/Junior Engineer 1 EUD740820002 Associate Engineer 1
EUD740820001 Associate Engineer 1
EUD741548003 Data Management Specialist I/II 1
EUD741548002 Data Management Specialist I/II 1
EUD741548001 Data Management Specialist I/II 1
EUD749561001 Data Management System Administrator 1
EUD741645001 Department Public Information Officer 1
EUD741672001 Development Technician I/II 1
EUD749550001 ERP Business Analyst I/II 1
EUD741350002 Engineering Technician I/II 1
EUD741350001 Engineering Technician I/II 1
EUD742544002 Environmental Compliance Specialist I/II 1 EUD742544001 Environmental Compliance Specialist I/II 1 EUD742548001 Environmental Utilities Business Administrator 1 EUD742547004 Environmental Utilities Business Analyst I/II 1 EUD742547003 Environmental Utilities Business Analyst I/II 1 EUD742547002 Environmental Utilities Business Analyst I/II 1 EUD742547001 Environmental Utilities Business Analyst I/II 1 EUD741684001 Environmental Utilities Director 1
EUD741038006 Environmental Utilities Instrument and Control Technician I/II
1 EUD741038005 Environmental Utilities Instrument and Control Technician I/II
1 EUD741038004 Environmental Utilities Instrument and Control Technician I/II
1 EUD741038003 Environmental Utilities Instrument and Control Technician I/II
1 EUD741038002 Environmental Utilities Instrument and Control Technician I/II
1 EUD741038001 Environmental Utilities Instrument and Control Technician I/II
1 EUD741024001 Environmental Utilities Maintenance Superintendent 1 EUD742541003 Environmental Utility Compliance Administrator 1 EUD742541002 Environmental Utility Compliance Administrator 1 EUD742541001 Environmental Utility Compliance Administrator 1 EUD743412003 GIS Analyst I/II 1
EUD743412002 GIS Analyst I/II 1
EUD743412001 GIS Analyst I/II 1
EUD741648001 Government Relations Representative I/II 1 EUD743604001 Industrial Waste Specialist 1
EUD743610002 Industrial Waste Technician 1
EUD743732002 Interpretive Services Specialist I/II 1
EUD743732001 Interpretive Services Specialist I/II 1
EUD744020005 Laboratory Technician I/II 1
EUD744020004 Laboratory Technician I/II 1
EUD744020003 Laboratory Technician I/II 1
EUD744020001 Laboratory Technician I/II 1
EUD740050001 Management Analyst I/II 1
EUD744517003 Marketing and Communication Analyst I/II 1 EUD744517002 Marketing and Communication Analyst I/II 1 EUD744520002 Materials Technician 1
EUD744520001 Materials Technician 1
EUD744957012 Office Assistant I/II 1
EUD744957011 Office Assistant I/II 1
EUD744957010 Office Assistant I/II 1
EUD744957009 Office Assistant I/II 1
EUD744957008 Office Assistant I/II 1
EUD744957006 Office Assistant I/II 1
EUD744957005 Office Assistant I/II 1
EUD744957004 Office Assistant I/II 1
EUD744957003 Office Assistant I/II 1
EUD744957002 Office Assistant I/II 1
EUD744957001 Office Assistant I/II 1
EUD741028001 Organics Truck Driver 1
EUD745319003 Plant and Equipment Maintenance Worker I/II 1 EUD745319002 Plant and Equipment Maintenance Worker I/II 1 EUD745319001 Plant and Equipment Maintenance Worker I/II 1 EUD745328006 Plant and Equipment Mechanic I/II 1
EUD745328005 Plant and Equipment Mechanic I/II 1
EUD745328004 Plant and Equipment Mechanic I/II 1
EUD745328003 Plant and Equipment Mechanic I/II 1
EUD745328002 Plant and Equipment Mechanic I/II 1
EUD745328001 Plant and Equipment Mechanic I/II 1
EUD745402001 Predictive Maintenance Technician I/II 1
EUD745533002 Preventative Maintenance Coordinator 1
EUD745533001 Preventative Maintenance Coordinator 1
EUD745519002 Preventative Maintenance Supervisor 1
EUD745519001 Preventative Maintenance Supervisor 1
EUD745502005 Preventative Maintenance Technician I/II 1 EUD745502004 Preventative Maintenance Technician I/II 1 EUD745502003 Preventative Maintenance Technician I/II 1 EUD745502002 Preventative Maintenance Technician I/II 1 EUD745502001 Preventative Maintenance Technician I/II 1 EUD745514003 Principal Engineer 1
EUD745514002 Principal Engineer 1
EUD745514001 Principal Engineer 1
EUD741004001 Process Engineer 1
EUD746150001 Recycling and Organics Coordinator 1
EUD746226005 Refuse Maintenance Worker I/II 1
EUD746226004 Refuse Maintenance Worker I/II 1
EUD746226003 Refuse Maintenance Worker I/II 1
EUD746226002 Refuse Maintenance Worker I/II 1
EUD746226001 Refuse Maintenance Worker I/II 1
EUD746231001 Refuse Superintendent 1
EUD746235004 Refuse Supervisor 1
EUD746235003 Refuse Supervisor 1
EUD746235002 Refuse Supervisor 1
EUD746235001 Refuse Supervisor 1
EUD746304042 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304040 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304039 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304038 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304037 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304036 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304035 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304034 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304033 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304032 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304031 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304030 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304029 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304028 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304027 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304026 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304025 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304024 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304023 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304022 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304021 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304020 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304019 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304018 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304017 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304016 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304015 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304014 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304013 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304012 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304011 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304010 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304009 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304008 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304007 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304006 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304005 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304004 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304003 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304002 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746304001 Refuse Truck Driver I/II 1
EUD746244001 Refuse and Stormwater Manager 1
EUD747020002 SCADA System Technician 1
EUD747020001 SCADA System Technician 1
EUD746500002 Safety Coordinator 1
EUD746500001 Safety Coordinator 1
EUD747142004 Senior Engineer 1
EUD747142002 Senior Engineer 1
EUD747142001 Senior Engineer 1
EUD741065001 Senior Environmental Utilities Business Analyst 1 EUD747161001 Senior GIS Analyst 1
EUD743733001 Senior Interpretive Services Specialist 1
EUD747284003 Senior Preventative Maintenance Technician 1 EUD747284002 Senior Preventative Maintenance Technician 1 EUD747284001 Senior Preventative Maintenance Technician 1 EUD747129007 Senior Refuse Truck Driver 1
EUD747129006 Senior Refuse Truck Driver 1
EUD747129005 Senior Refuse Truck Driver 1
EUD747129004 Senior Refuse Truck Driver 1
EUD747129003 Senior Refuse Truck Driver 1
EUD747129002 Senior Refuse Truck Driver 1
EUD747129001 Senior Refuse Truck Driver 1
EUD749559001 Senior SCADA System Technician 1
EUD741279001 Senior Solid Waste Billing Technician 1
EUD747202004 Senior Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker 1 EUD747202003 Senior Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker 1 EUD747202002 Senior Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker 1 EUD747202001 Senior Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker 1 EUD747202005 Senior Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker 1 EUD747204007 Senior Water Distribution Worker 1
EUD747204006 Senior Water Distribution Worker 1
EUD747204005 Senior Water Distribution Worker 1
EUD747204004 Senior Water Distribution Worker 1
EUD747204003 Senior Water Distribution Worker 1
EUD747204002 Senior Water Distribution Worker 1
EUD747204001 Senior Water Distribution Worker 1
EUD747324001 Solid Waste Billing Technician 1
EUD741102001 Utility Exploration Center Supervisor 1
EUD741646001 Utility Government Relations Administrator 1 EUD741099002 Waste Services Clerk I/II 1
EUD741099001 Waste Services Clerk I/II 1
EUD748978002 Wasterwater Collection Supervisor 1
EUD748980001 Wastewater Collection Superintendent 1
EUD748978003 Wastewater Collection Supervisor 1
EUD748978001 Wastewater Collection Supervisor 1
EUD749040001 Wastewater Treatment Plant Chief Operator 1 EUD749025009 Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Grade I/II/III 8Hr 1 EUD749025008 Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Grade I/II/III 8Hr 1 EUD749025006 Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Grade I/II/III 8Hr 1 EUD749025005 Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Grade I/II/III 8Hr 1 EUD749025004 Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Grade I/II/III 8Hr 1 EUD749025003 Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Grade I/II/III 8Hr 1 EUD749025002 Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Grade I/II/III 8Hr 1 EUD749025001 Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Grade I/II/III 8Hr 1 EUD749025010 Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Grade III 24Hr 1 EUD749025007 Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Grade III 24Hr 1 EUD749020004 Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Grade III 24Hr 1 EUD749020003 Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Grade III 24Hr 1 EUD749020002 Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Grade III 24Hr 1 EUD749020001 Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Grade III 24Hr 1 EUD749030002 Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Grade IV 1 EUD749030001 Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Grade IV 1 EUD749029026 Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II 1 EUD749029025 Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II 1 EUD749029024 Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II 1 EUD749029022 Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II 1 EUD749029021 Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II 1 EUD749029020 Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II 1 EUD749029019 Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II 1 EUD749029018 Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II 1 EUD749029017 Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II 1 EUD749029016 Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II 1 EUD749029015 Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II 1 EUD749029014 Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II 1 EUD749029013 Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II 1 EUD749029012 Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II 1 EUD749029011 Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II 1 EUD749029010 Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II 1 EUD749029009 Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II 1 EUD749029008 Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II 1 EUD749029007 Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II 1 EUD749029006 Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II 1 EUD749029005 Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II 1 EUD749029004 Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II 1 EUD749029003 Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II 1 EUD749029002 Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II 1 EUD749029001 Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II 1 EUD749029023 Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II 1 EUD749045001 Wastewater Utility Manager 1
EUD749047001 Water Conservation Administrator 1
EUD749078001 Water Conservation Specialist 1
EUD749051005 Water Conservation Worker I/II 1
EUD749051004 Water Conservation Worker I/II 1
EUD749051003 Water Conservation Worker I/II 1
EUD749051002 Water Conservation Worker I/II 1
EUD749051001 Water Conservation Worker I/II 1
EUD749085001 Water Distribution Superintendent 1
EUD749084004 Water Distribution Supervisor 1
EUD749084003 Water Distribution Supervisor 1
EUD749084002 Water Distribution Supervisor 1
EUD749084001 Water Distribution Supervisor 1
EUD749248023 Water Distribution Worker I/II 1
EUD749248022 Water Distribution Worker I/II 1
EUD749248021 Water Distribution Worker I/II 1
EUD749248020 Water Distribution Worker I/II 1
EUD749248019 Water Distribution Worker I/II 1
EUD749248018 Water Distribution Worker I/II 1
EUD749248017 Water Distribution Worker I/II 1
EUD749248016 Water Distribution Worker I/II 1
EUD749248015 Water Distribution Worker I/II 1
EUD749248014 Water Distribution Worker I/II 1
EUD749248013 Water Distribution Worker I/II 1
EUD749248012 Water Distribution Worker I/II 1
EUD749248011 Water Distribution Worker I/II 1
EUD749248010 Water Distribution Worker I/II 1
EUD749248009 Water Distribution Worker I/II 1
EUD749248008 Water Distribution Worker I/II 1
EUD749248007 Water Distribution Worker I/II 1
EUD749248006 Water Distribution Worker I/II 1
EUD749248005 Water Distribution Worker I/II 1
EUD749248004 Water Distribution Worker I/II 1
EUD749248003 Water Distribution Worker I/II 1
EUD749248002 Water Distribution Worker I/II 1
EUD749248001 Water Distribution Worker I/II 1
EUD749101001 Water Quality Lab Supervisor 1
EUD749101002 Water Quality Lab Supervisor 1
EUD741053001 Water Quality Technician 1
EUD749175001 Water Treatment Plant Chief Operator 1
EUD749230006 Water Treatment Plant Operator Grade I/II/III 24Hr 1 EUD749230005 Water Treatment Plant Operator Grade I/II/III 24Hr 1 EUD749230004 Water Treatment Plant Operator Grade I/II/III 24Hr 1 EUD749230003 Water Treatment Plant Operator Grade I/II/III 24Hr 1 EUD749230002 Water Treatment Plant Operator Grade I/II/III 24Hr 1 EUD749230001 Water Treatment Plant Operator Grade I/II/III 24Hr 1 EUD749244001 Water Utility Manager 1
Total for Department: EUD Environmental
Utilities Department
277
Position Code Position Title Allocated FTE
FIN240040003 Accountant I/II 1
FIN240040002 Accountant I/II 1
FIN240040001 Accountant I/II 1
FIN241370001 Accounting Manager 1
FIN240043001 Accounting Supervisor 1
FIN249427001 Accounts Payable Supervisor 1
FIN240084001 Administrative Technician 1
FIN241021001 Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer 1 FIN2421026001 Assistant Finance Director 1
FIN240915004 Budget Analyst I/II 1
FIN240915003 Budget Analyst I/II 1
FIN240915002 Budget Analyst I/II 1
FIN240915001 Budget Analyst I/II 1
FIN240930001 Budget Manager 1
FIN241060004 Buyer I/II 1
FIN241060003 Buyer I/II 1
FIN241060002 Buyer I/II 1
FIN241060001 Buyer I/II 1
FIN249550004 ERP Business Analyst I/II 1
FIN249550003 ERP Business Analyst I/II 1
FIN249550002 ERP Business Analyst I/II 1
FIN249550001 ERP Business Analyst I/II 1
FIN246520001 ERP Program Manager 1
FIN242900001 Finance Manager 1
FIN243326007 Finance Technician I/II 0.625
FIN243326006 Finance Technician I/II 1
FIN243326005 Finance Technician I/II 1
FIN243326004 Finance Technician I/II 1
FIN243326003 Finance Technician I/II 1
FIN243326002 Finance Technician I/II 1
FIN243326001 Finance Technician I/II 1
FIN240050001 Management Analyst I/II 1
FIN244457001 Management Assistant I/II 1
FIN249428001 Payroll Supervisor 1
FIN245101004 Payroll Technician I/II 0.6
FIN245101003 Payroll Technician I/II 1
FIN245101002 Payroll Technician I/II 1
FIN245101001 Payroll Technician I/II 1
FIN245652001 Purchasing and Warehouse Manager 1
FIN241051003 Senior Accountant 1
FIN241051002 Senior Accountant 1
FIN241051001 Senior Accountant 1
FIN247139001 Senior Buyer 1
FIN247141002 Senior Payroll Technician 1
FIN247141001 Senior Payroll Technician 1
FIN247203001 Senior Warehouse Worker 1
FIN248952001 Warehouse Worker I/II 1
FIN248952002 Warehouse Worker I/II 1
Total for Department: FIN Finance Department 47.225
Position Code Position Title Allocated FTE
FIR480071001 Administrative Assistant 1
FIR480084001 Administrative Technician 1
FIR480480001 Assistant Fire Chief 1
FIR481645001 Department Public Information Officer 1
FIR482415001 EMS Quality Assurance Coordinator 1
FIR480905007 Fire Battalion Chief 1
FIR480905006 Fire Battalion Chief 1
FIR480905004 Fire Battalion Chief 1
FIR480905003 Fire Battalion Chief 1
FIR480905002 Fire Battalion Chief 1
FIR480905001 Fire Battalion Chief 1
FIR480905005 Fire Battalion Chief 1
FIR483320030 Fire Captain 1
FIR483320029 Fire Captain 1
FIR483320028 Fire Captain 1
FIR483320027 Fire Captain 1
FIR483320026 Fire Captain 1
FIR483320025 Fire Captain 1
FIR483320024 Fire Captain 1
FIR483320023 Fire Captain 1
FIR483320022 Fire Captain 1
FIR483320021 Fire Captain 1
FIR483320020 Fire Captain 1
FIR483320019 Fire Captain 1
FIR483320018 Fire Captain 1
FIR483320017 Fire Captain 1
FIR483320016 Fire Captain 1
FIR483320015 Fire Captain 1
FIR483320014 Fire Captain 1
FIR483320013 Fire Captain 1
FIR483320012 Fire Captain 1
FIR483320011 Fire Captain 1
FIR483320010 Fire Captain 1
FIR483320009 Fire Captain 1
FIR483320008 Fire Captain 1
FIR483320007 Fire Captain 1
FIR483320006 Fire Captain 1
FIR483320005 Fire Captain 1
FIR483320004 Fire Captain 1
FIR483320003 Fire Captain 1
FIR483320002 Fire Captain 1
FIR483320001 Fire Captain 1
FIR483330001 Fire Chief 1
FIR483332002 Fire Division Chief 1
FIR483332001 Fire Division Chief 1
FIR483340030 Fire Engineer 1
FIR483340029 Fire Engineer 1
FIR483340028 Fire Engineer 1
FIR483340027 Fire Engineer 1
FIR483340026 Fire Engineer 1
FIR483340025 Fire Engineer 1
FIR483340024 Fire Engineer 1
FIR483340023 Fire Engineer 1
FIR483340022 Fire Engineer 1
FIR483340021 Fire Engineer 1
FIR483340020 Fire Engineer 1
FIR483340019 Fire Engineer 1
FIR483340018 Fire Engineer 1
FIR483340017 Fire Engineer 1
FIR483340016 Fire Engineer 1
FIR483340015 Fire Engineer 1
FIR483340014 Fire Engineer 1
FIR483340013 Fire Engineer 1
FIR483340012 Fire Engineer 1
FIR483340011 Fire Engineer 1
FIR483340010 Fire Engineer 1
FIR483340009 Fire Engineer 1
FIR483340008 Fire Engineer 1
FIR483340007 Fire Engineer 1
FIR483340006 Fire Engineer 1
FIR483340005 Fire Engineer 1
FIR483340004 Fire Engineer 1
FIR483340003 Fire Engineer 1
FIR483340002 Fire Engineer 1
FIR483340001 Fire Engineer 1
FIR481022001 Fire and Environmental Inspection Supervisor 1 FIR483377005 Fire and Environmental Safety Inspector I/II 1 FIR483377004 Fire and Environmental Safety Inspector I/II 1 FIR483377003 Fire and Environmental Safety Inspector I/II 1 FIR483377002 Fire and Environmental Safety Inspector I/II 1 FIR483377001 Fire and Environmental Safety Inspector I/II 1 FIR483355036 Firefighter Paramedic I/II 1
FIR483355035 Firefighter Paramedic I/II 1
FIR483355034 Firefighter Paramedic I/II 1
FIR483355033 Firefighter Paramedic I/II 1
FIR483355032 Firefighter Paramedic I/II 1
FIR483355031 Firefighter Paramedic I/II 1
FIR483355030 Firefighter Paramedic I/II 1
FIR483355029 Firefighter Paramedic I/II 1
FIR483355028 Firefighter Paramedic I/II 1
FIR483355027 Firefighter Paramedic I/II 1
FIR483355026 Firefighter Paramedic I/II 1
FIR483355025 Firefighter Paramedic I/II 1
FIR483355024 Firefighter Paramedic I/II 1
FIR483355023 Firefighter Paramedic I/II 1
FIR483355022 Firefighter Paramedic I/II 1
FIR483355021 Firefighter Paramedic I/II 1
FIR483355020 Firefighter Paramedic I/II 1
FIR483355019 Firefighter Paramedic I/II 1
FIR483355018 Firefighter Paramedic I/II 1
FIR483355017 Firefighter Paramedic I/II 1
FIR483355016 Firefighter Paramedic I/II 1
FIR483355015 Firefighter Paramedic I/II 1
FIR483355014 Firefighter Paramedic I/II 1
FIR483355013 Firefighter Paramedic I/II 1
FIR483355012 Firefighter Paramedic I/II 1
FIR483355011 Firefighter Paramedic I/II 1
FIR483355010 Firefighter Paramedic I/II 1
FIR483355009 Firefighter Paramedic I/II 1
FIR483355008 Firefighter Paramedic I/II 1
FIR483355007 Firefighter Paramedic I/II 1
FIR483355006 Firefighter Paramedic I/II 1
FIR483355005 Firefighter Paramedic I/II 1
FIR483355004 Firefighter Paramedic I/II 1
FIR483355003 Firefighter Paramedic I/II 1
FIR483355002 Firefighter Paramedic I/II 1
FIR483355001 Firefighter Paramedic I/II 1
FIR483412001 GIS Analyst I/II 1
FIR480050001 Management Analyst I/II 1
FIR484957001 Office Assistant I/II 1
Total for Department: FIR Fire Department 120
Position Code Position Title Allocated FTE
HRD280071001 Administrative Assistant 1
HRD280484001 Assistant Human Resources Director 1
HRD283596003 Human Resources Analyst I/II 1
HRD283596002 Human Resources Analyst I/II 1
HRD283596001 Human Resources Analyst I/II 1
HRD283598001 Human Resources Director 1
HRD283599001 Human Resources Manager 1
HRD285235008 Human Resources Technician 1
HRD285235007 Human Resources Technician 1
HRD285235006 Human Resources Technician 1
HRD285235005 Human Resources Technician 1
HRD285235004 Human Resources Technician 1
HRD285235003 Human Resources Technician 1
HRD285235002 Human Resources Technician 1
HRD285235001 Human Resources Technician 1
HRD286450001 Risk Manager 1
HRD287178002 Senior Human Resources Technician 1
HRD287178001 Senior Human Resources Technician 1
Total for Department: HRD Human Resources
Department
18 Position Code Position Title Allocated FTE
ITD320084001 Administrative Technician 1
ITD329558002 Assistant Information Technology Director 1 ITD329558001 Assistant Information Technology Director 1 ITD321362012 Business Systems Analyst I/II 1
ITD321362011 Business Systems Analyst I/II 1
ITD321362010 Business Systems Analyst I/II 1
ITD321362009 Business Systems Analyst I/II 1
ITD321362008 Business Systems Analyst I/II 1
ITD321362007 Business Systems Analyst I/II 1
ITD321362006 Business Systems Analyst I/II 1
ITD321362005 Business Systems Analyst I/II 1
ITD321362004 Business Systems Analyst I/II 1
ITD321362003 Business Systems Analyst I/II 1
ITD321362002 Business Systems Analyst I/II 1
ITD321362001 Business Systems Analyst I/II 1
ITD321180001 Chief Information Officer 1
ITD321552007 Database Analyst I/II 1
ITD321552006 Database Analyst I/II 1
ITD321552005 Database Analyst I/II 1
ITD321552004 Database Analyst I/II 1
ITD321552003 Database Analyst I/II 1
ITD321552002 Database Analyst I/II 1
ITD321552001 Database Analyst I/II 1
ITD323625001 Information Security Administrator 1
ITD323794013 Information Technology Analyst I/II 1
ITD323794012 Information Technology Analyst I/II 1
ITD323794010 Information Technology Analyst I/II 1
ITD323794009 Information Technology Analyst I/II 1
ITD323794007 Information Technology Analyst I/II 1
ITD323794006 Information Technology Analyst I/II 1
ITD323794005 Information Technology Analyst I/II 1
ITD323794002 Information Technology Analyst I/II 1
ITD323794001 Information Technology Analyst I/II 1
ITD329542001 Information Technology Client Services Supervisor 1 ITD323602005 Information Technology Program Manager 1
ITD323602004 Information Technology Program Manager 1
ITD323602003 Information Technology Program Manager 1
ITD323602002 Information Technology Program Manager 1
ITD323602001 Information Technology Program Manager 1
ITD323618003 Information Technology Technician I/II 1
ITD323618002 Information Technology Technician I/II 1
ITD323618001 Information Technology Technician I/II 1
ITD320050001 Management Analyst I/II 1
ITD321089003 Security Analyst I/II 1
ITD321089002 Security Analyst I/II 1
ITD321089001 Security Analyst I/II 1
ITD327130003 Senior Business Systems Analyst 1
ITD327130002 Senior Business Systems Analyst 1
ITD327130001 Senior Business Systems Analyst 1
ITD327145001 Senior Database Analyst 1
ITD327149003 Senior Information Technology Technician 1 ITD321091007 Systems Architect 1
ITD321091006 Systems Architect 1
ITD321091005 Systems Architect 1
ITD321091004 Systems Architect 1
ITD321091003 Systems Architect 1
ITD321091002 Systems Architect 1
ITD321091001 Systems Architect 1
Total for Department: ITD Information
Technology Department
58*
*7 positions will be eliminated after promotion process has been completed Position Code Position Title Allocated FTE
PAC181645001 Department Public Information Officer 1
PAC181659001 Deputy City Manager 1
CMO143451001 Government Relations Administrator 1
PAC184517002 Marketing and Communication Analyst I/II 1 PAC184517001 Marketing and Communication Analyst I/II 1 PAC181108001 Public Affairs and Communication Manager 1 PAC188426001 Video and Multimedia Technician 1
Total for Department: PAC Public Affairs and
Communications
7 Position Code Position Title Allocated FTE
POL440071001 Administrative Assistant 1
POL440100003 Animal Control Officer 1
POL440100002 Animal Control Officer 1
POL440100001 Animal Control Officer 1
POL440110001 Animal Control Supervisor 1
POL441430004 Communications Supervisor 1
POL441430003 Communications Supervisor 1
POL441430002 Communications Supervisor 1
POL441430001 Communications Supervisor 1
POL441380010 Community Services Officer I/II 1
POL441380009 Community Services Officer I/II 1
POL441380008 Community Services Officer I/II 1
POL441380007 Community Services Officer I/II 1
POL441380006 Community Services Officer I/II 1
POL441380005 Community Services Officer I/II 1
POL441380004 Community Services Officer I/II 1
POL441380003 Community Services Officer I/II 1
POL441380002 Community Services Officer I/II 1
POL441380001 Community Services Officer I/II 1
POL441475002 Crime Analyst 1
POL441475001 Crime Analyst 1
POL441645001 Department Public Information Officer 1
POL441700021 Dispatcher I/II 1
POL441700020 Dispatcher I/II 1
POL441700019 Dispatcher I/II 1
POL441700018 Dispatcher I/II 1
POL441700017 Dispatcher I/II 1
POL441700016 Dispatcher I/II 1
POL441700015 Dispatcher I/II 1
POL441700014 Dispatcher I/II 1
POL441700013 Dispatcher I/II 1
POL441700012 Dispatcher I/II 1
POL441700011 Dispatcher I/II 1
POL441700010 Dispatcher I/II 1
POL441700009 Dispatcher I/II 1
POL441700008 Dispatcher I/II 1
POL441700007 Dispatcher I/II 1
POL441700006 Dispatcher I/II 1
POL441700005 Dispatcher I/II 1
POL441700004 Dispatcher I/II 1
POL441700003 Dispatcher I/II 1
POL441700002 Dispatcher I/II 1
POL441700001 Dispatcher I/II 1
POL440050001 Management Analyst I/II 1
POL445400003 Police Captain 1
POL445400002 Police Captain 1
POL445400001 Police Captain 1
POL445410001 Police Chief 1
POL445420007 Police Lieutenant 1
POL445420006 Police Lieutenant 1
POL445420005 Police Lieutenant 1
POL445420004 Police Lieutenant 1
POL445420003 Police Lieutenant 1
POL445420002 Police Lieutenant 1
POL445420001 Police Lieutenant 1
POL445430125 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430124 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430123 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430122 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430121 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430120 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430119 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430118 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430117 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430116 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430115 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430114 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430113 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430112 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430111 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430110 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430109 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430108 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430107 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430106 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430105 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430104 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430103 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430102 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430101 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430100 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430099 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430098 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430097 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430096 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430095 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430094 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430093 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430092 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430091 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430090 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430089 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430088 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430087 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430086 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430085 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430084 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430083 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430082 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430081 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430080 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430079 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430078 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430077 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430076 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430075 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430074 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430073 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430072 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430071 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430070 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430069 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430068 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430067 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430066 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430065 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430064 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430063 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430062 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430061 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430060 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430059 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430058 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430057 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430056 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430055 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430054 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430053 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430052 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430051 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430050 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430049 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430048 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430047 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430046 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430045 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430044 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430043 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430042 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430041 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430040 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430039 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430038 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430037 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430036 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430035 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430034 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430033 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430032 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430031 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430030 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430029 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430028 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430027 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430026 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430025 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430024 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430023 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430022 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430021 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430020 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430019 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430018 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430017 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430016 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430015 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430014 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430013 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430012 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430011 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430010 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430009 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430008 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430007 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430006 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430005 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430004 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430003 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430002 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445430001 Police Officer/Police Trainee 1
POL445429001 Police Property and Evidence Supervisor 1
POL441094004 Police Property and Evidence Technician I/II 1 POL441094003 Police Property and Evidence Technician I/II 1 POL441094002 Police Property and Evidence Technician I/II 1 POL441094001 Police Property and Evidence Technician I/II 1 POL445440010 Police Records Clerk I/II 1
POL445440009 Police Records Clerk I/II 1
POL445440008 Police Records Clerk I/II 1
POL445440007 Police Records Clerk I/II 1
POL445440005 Police Records Clerk I/II 1
POL445440004 Police Records Clerk I/II 1
POL445440003 Police Records Clerk I/II 1
POL445440002 Police Records Clerk I/II 1
POL445440001 Police Records Clerk I/II 1
POL445494004 Police Scene Technician I/II 1
POL445494003 Police Scene Technician I/II 1
POL445494002 Police Scene Technician I/II 1
POL445494001 Police Scene Technician I/II 1
POL445470017 Police Sergeant 1
POL445470016 Police Sergeant 1
POL445470015 Police Sergeant 1
POL445470014 Police Sergeant 1
POL445470013 Police Sergeant 1
POL445470012 Police Sergeant 1
POL445470011 Police Sergeant 1
POL445470010 Police Sergeant 1
POL445470009 Police Sergeant 1
POL445470008 Police Sergeant 1
POL445470007 Police Sergeant 1
POL445470006 Police Sergeant 1
POL445470005 Police Sergeant 1
POL445470004 Police Sergeant 1
POL445470003 Police Sergeant 1
POL445470002 Police Sergeant 1
POL445470001 Police Sergeant 1
POL445489002 Police Services Administrator 1
POL445489001 Police Services Administrator 1
POL441039001 Police Social Services Practitioner 1
POL445657001 Public Safety Program Coordinator 1
POL445748002 Records Supervisor 1
POL445748001 Records Supervisor 1
POL441092002 Senior Police Records Clerk 1
POL441092001 Senior Police Records Clerk 1
Total for Department: POL Police Department 223
Position Code Position Title Allocated FTE
PRL580071001 Administrative Assistant 1
PRL580084008 Administrative Technician 1
PRL580084007 Administrative Technician 1
PRL580084006 Administrative Technician 1
PRL580084005 Administrative Technician 1
PRL580084004 Administrative Technician 1
PRL580084003 Administrative Technician 1
PRL580084002 Administrative Technician 1
PRL580084001 Administrative Technician 1
PRL588302001 Aquatics Maintenance Technician 1
PRL588300001 Arborist Technician 1
PRL581225010 Child Care Site Coordinator 1
PRL581225009 Child Care Site Coordinator 1
PRL581225008 Child Care Site Coordinator 1
PRL581225007 Child Care Site Coordinator 1
PRL581225006 Child Care Site Coordinator 1
PRL581225005 Child Care Site Coordinator 1
PRL581225004 Child Care Site Coordinator 1
PRL581225003 Child Care Site Coordinator 1
PRL581225002 Child Care Site Coordinator 1
PRL581225001 Child Care Site Coordinator 1
PRL581645002 Department Public Information Officer 1
PRL585075001 Irrigation Technician 1
PRL585075002 Irrigation Technician 1
PRL584152007 Librarian I/II 0.5
PRL584152005 Librarian I/II 1
PRL584152004 Librarian I/II 1
PRL584152003 Librarian I/II 1
PRL584152002 Librarian I/II 1
PRL584152001 Librarian I/II 1
PRL584210005 Library Assistant I/II 1
PRL584210003 Library Assistant I/II 1
PRL584210002 Library Assistant I/II 1
PRL584210001 Library Assistant I/II 1
PRL584250003 Library Technician 1
PRL584250002 Library Technician 1
PRL584250001 Library Technician 1
PRL580050002 Management Analyst I/II 1
PRL580050001 Management Analyst I/II 1
PRL584517001 Marketing and Communication Analyst I/II 1 PRL589545001 Natural Resources Specialist I/II 1
PRL584872003 Natural Resources Worker  I/II 1
PRL584872002 Natural Resources Worker  I/II 1
PRL584872001 Natural Resources Worker  I/II 1
PRL584957009 Office Assistant I/II 1
PRL584957006 Office Assistant I/II 1
PRL584957003 Office Assistant I/II 1
PRL584957002 Office Assistant I/II 1
PRL585022002 Park Development Project Manager I/II 1
PRL585022001 Park Development Project Manager I/II 1
PRL581106001 Park Planning and Development Manager 1
PRL585080023 Parks Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PRL585080022 Parks Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PRL585080021 Parks Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PRL585080020 Parks Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PRL585080019 Parks Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PRL585080018 Parks Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PRL585080017 Parks Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PRL585080016 Parks Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PRL585080015 Parks Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PRL585080014 Parks Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PRL585080013 Parks Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PRL585080012 Parks Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PRL585080011 Parks Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PRL585080010 Parks Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PRL585080009 Parks Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PRL585080008 Parks Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PRL585080007 Parks Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PRL585080006 Parks Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PRL585080004 Parks Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PRL585080003 Parks Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PRL585080002 Parks Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PRL585080001 Parks Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PRL581278006 Parks Project Technician 1
PRL581278005 Parks Project Technician 1
PRL581278004 Parks Project Technician 1
PRL581278003 Parks Project Technician 1
PRL581278002 Parks Project Technician 1
PRL581278001 Parks Project Technician 1
PRL589543011 Parks Recreation and Libraries Coordinator I/II 1 PRL589543010 Parks Recreation and Libraries Coordinator I/II 1 PRL589543009 Parks Recreation and Libraries Coordinator I/II 1 PRL589543007 Parks Recreation and Libraries Coordinator I/II 1 PRL589543006 Parks Recreation and Libraries Coordinator I/II 1 PRL589543005 Parks Recreation and Libraries Coordinator I/II 1 PRL589543004 Parks Recreation and Libraries Coordinator I/II 1 PRL589543003 Parks Recreation and Libraries Coordinator I/II 1 PRL589543002 Parks Recreation and Libraries Coordinator I/II 1 PRL589543001 Parks Recreation and Libraries Coordinator I/II 1 PRL589543008 Parks Recreation and Libraries Coordinator I/II 1 PRL585082001 Parks Recreation and Libraries Director 1
PRL589547003 Parks Recreation and Libraries Manager 1
PRL589547002 Parks Recreation and Libraries Manager 1
PRL589547001 Parks Recreation and Libraries Manager 1
PRL589546005 Parks Recreation and Libraries Superintendent 1 PRL589546004 Parks Recreation and Libraries Superintendent 1 PRL589546003 Parks Recreation and Libraries Superintendent 1 PRL589546002 Parks Recreation and Libraries Superintendent 1 PRL589546001 Parks Recreation and Libraries Superintendent 1 PRL585069004 Parks Supervisor 1
PRL585069003 Parks Supervisor 1
PRL585069002 Parks Supervisor 1
PRL585069001 Parks Supervisor 1
PRL588304006 Recreation Leader 1
PRL588304005 Recreation Leader 1
PRL588304004 Recreation Leader 1
PRL588304003 Recreation Leader 1
PRL588304002 Recreation Leader 1
PRL588304001 Recreation Leader 1
PRL589544009 Recreation and Library Supervisor 1
PRL589544008 Recreation and Library Supervisor 1
PRL589544007 Recreation and Library Supervisor 1
PRL589544006 Recreation and Library Supervisor 1
PRL589544005 Recreation and Library Supervisor 1
PRL589544004 Recreation and Library Supervisor 1
PRL589544003 Recreation and Library Supervisor 1
PRL589544002 Recreation and Library Supervisor 1
PRL589544001 Recreation and Library Supervisor 1
PRL583733001 Senior Interpretive Services Specialist 1
PRL587154001 Senior Natural Resources Worker 1
PRL587192006 Senior Parks Maintenance Worker 1
PRL587192005 Senior Parks Maintenance Worker 1
PRL587192004 Senior Parks Maintenance Worker 1
PRL587192003 Senior Parks Maintenance Worker 1
PRL587192002 Senior Parks Maintenance Worker 1
PRL587201001 Senior Tree Trimmer 1
PRL581504002 Tree Trimmer I/II 1
PRL581504001 Tree Trimmer I/II 1
PRL581107001 Turf and Sports Field Technician 1
PRL588762001 Urban Forester 1
PRL581641004 Youth Development Program Coordinator 1
PRL581641003 Youth Development Program Coordinator 1
PRL581641002 Youth Development Program Coordinator 1
PRL581641001 Youth Development Program Coordinator 1
Total for Department: PRL Parks Recreation
and Libraries
133.5
Position Code Position Title Allocated FTE
PWD620088001 Associate/Assistant Transportation Planner 1 PWD620071001 Administrative Assistant 1
PWD620084006 Administrative Technician 0.75
PWD620084005 Administrative Technician 1
PWD620084003 Administrative Technician 1
PWD620084002 Administrative Technician 1
PWD620084001 Administrative Technician 1
PWD620090001 Alternative Transportation Manager 1
PWD621005011 Associate (PE)/Assistant/Junior Engineer 1 PWD621005010 Associate (PE)/Assistant/Junior Engineer 1 PWD621005009 Associate (PE)/Assistant/Junior Engineer 1 PWD621005008 Associate (PE)/Assistant/Junior Engineer 1 PWD621005007 Associate (PE)/Assistant/Junior Engineer 1 PWD621005006 Associate (PE)/Assistant/Junior Engineer 1 PWD621005005 Associate (PE)/Assistant/Junior Engineer 1 PWD621005004 Associate (PE)/Assistant/Junior Engineer 1 PWD621005003 Associate (PE)/Assistant/Junior Engineer 1 PWD621005002 Associate (PE)/Assistant/Junior Engineer 1 PWD621005001 Associate (PE)/Assistant/Junior Engineer 1 PWD620088003 Associate/Assistant Transportation Planner 1 PWD621032006 Building Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PWD621032005 Building Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PWD621032004 Building Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PWD621032003 Building Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PWD621032002 Building Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PWD621032001 Building Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PWD621401001 Community Relations Analyst 1
PWD621485005 Custodian 1
PWD621485004 Custodian 1
PWD621485003 Custodian 1
PWD621485002 Custodian 1
PWD621485001 Custodian 1
PWD621025001 Custodian Supervisor 1
PWD622385004 Electronics Technician I/II 1
PWD622385003 Electronics Technician I/II 1
PWD622385002 Electronics Technician I/II 1
PWD622385001 Electronics Technician I/II 1
PWD621277001 Engineering Manager 1
PWD621350001 Engineering Technician I/II 1
PWD622560004 Equipment Serviceworker 1
PWD622560003 Equipment Serviceworker 1
PWD622560002 Equipment Serviceworker 1
PWD622560001 Equipment Serviceworker 1
PWD624321001 Facilities Supervisor 1
PWD623319001 Fleet Management Technician 1
PWD621113001 Fleet Services Parts Buyer 1
PWD622565001 Fleet Services Supervisor 1
PWD622214001 GIS Technician I/II 1
PWD620050002 Management Analyst I/II 1
PWD620050001 Management Analyst I/II 1
PWD624501010 Mechanic I/II 1
PWD624501009 Mechanic I/II 1
PWD624501008 Mechanic I/II 1
PWD624501007 Mechanic I/II 1
PWD624501006 Mechanic I/II 1
PWD624501005 Mechanic I/II 1
PWD624501004 Mechanic I/II 1
PWD624501003 Mechanic I/II 1
PWD624501002 Mechanic I/II 1
PWD624501001 Mechanic I/II 1
PWD624957007 Office Assistant I/II 0.5
PWD624957006 Office Assistant I/II 1
PWD624957005 Office Assistant I/II 1
PWD624957004 Office Assistant I/II 1
PWD624957003 Office Assistant I/II 1
PWD624957002 Office Assistant I/II 1
PWD624957001 Office Assistant I/II 1
PWD625519001 Preventative Maintenance Supervisor 1
PWD625560003 Project Coordinator 1
PWD625560002 Project Coordinator 1
PWD625560001 Project Coordinator 1
PWD621069001 Project Supervisor 1
PWD625635001 Public Works Director 1
PWD621087002 Public Works Manager 1
PWD621087001 Public Works Manager 1
PWD627119001 Senior Building Maintenance Worker 1
PWD627170001 Senior Electronic Technician 1
PWD627142003 Senior Engineer 1
PWD627142002 Senior Engineer 1
PWD627142001 Senior Engineer 1
PWD627189002 Senior Mechanic 1
PWD627189001 Senior Mechanic 1
PWD627187006 Senior Street Maintenance Worker 1
PWD627187005 Senior Street Maintenance Worker 1
PWD627187004 Senior Street Maintenance Worker 1
PWD627187003 Senior Street Maintenance Worker 1
PWD627187002 Senior Street Maintenance Worker 1
PWD627187001 Senior Street Maintenance Worker 1
PWD621073001 Street Maintenance Manager 1
PWD627522003 Street Maintenance Supervisor 1
PWD627522002 Street Maintenance Supervisor 1
PWD627522001 Street Maintenance Supervisor 1
PWD627530019 Street Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PWD627530018 Street Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PWD627530017 Street Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PWD627530016 Street Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PWD627530015 Street Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PWD627530014 Street Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PWD627530013 Street Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PWD627530012 Street Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PWD627530011 Street Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PWD627530010 Street Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PWD627530009 Street Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PWD627530008 Street Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PWD627530007 Street Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PWD627530006 Street Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PWD627530005 Street Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PWD627530004 Street Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PWD627530003 Street Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PWD627530002 Street Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PWD627530001 Street Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PWD627540005 Street Sweeper Operator 1
PWD627540004 Street Sweeper Operator 1
PWD627540003 Street Sweeper Operator 1
PWD627540002 Street Sweeper Operator 1
PWD627540001 Street Sweeper Operator 1
PWD622376003 Traffic Signal Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PWD622376002 Traffic Signal Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PWD622376001 Traffic Signal Maintenance Worker I/II 1
PWD621110001 Transit Operations Supervisor 1
PWD621052001 Transportation Grants Analyst 1
PWD621111001 Transportation Technician I/II 1
PWD628940001 Vehicle Maintenance Servicewriter 1
PWD628952001 Warehouse Worker I/II 1
Total for Department: PWD Public Works 123.25
Total for All Departments Allocated FTE
1326.225*
* 9 positions will be eliminated after promotion process has been completed

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2417
File #: 0103-34-02
Title: Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Grants Advisory Commission Year End Summary Report Contact: Trisha Isom 916-746-1239 [email protected] Meeting Date: 12/7/2022
Item #: 6.37.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council accept, for informational purposes, Grants Advisory Commission edits to the application and scoring questions as well as the Citizens Benefit Fund (CBF) and Roseville Employees Annual Charitable Hearts (REACH) year end summary report highlighting non-profit accomplishments for the grant funding cycle of FY2021-22.

BACKGROUND
In October of 2020, City Council approved the Grants Advisory Commission’s recommended Implementation Strategy of the Community Needs Assessment prepared by Koné Consulting.

The 2021/2022 and 2022/2023 grant cycles used the recommended strategies including categorizing the applications by service categories that align with the social determinates of heath and the new funding priorities. The scoring methodology was also adjusted to rank applications instead of using commissioner's numerical scores.

As directed, the implemented strategies were evaluated by a subcommittee of the GAC between July and November 2022 prior to commencement of the 2023/2024 funding cycle. After thorough review of the last two funding cycles, only minor additions and edits to the application questions and scoring questions were proposed and approved by the Commission. No changes to the Policy Manual are being recommended at this time.

The Grants Advisory Commission is also sharing the annual year end summary report that highlights the accomplishments of non-profit organizations that received Citizens Benefit Fund (CBF) and Roseville Employee Annual Charitable Hearts (REACH) funding awards for the FY2021-22 grant funding cycle. A total of $359,334 was distributed to 21 organizations for use between July 2021 and June 2022. The attached report provides a summary of each organization's goals and accomplishments. The report has been posted on the City's website, as well as social media platforms, to allow for transparency of our grant program, greater visibility of accomplishments, and to celebrate the non-profit successes.

FISCAL IMPACT
The changes to the application and scoring questions and annual Grants Advisory Commission summary report have no fiscal impact on the City's General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The Grants Advisory Commission application edits and summary report do not constitute a project and therefore, has no potential for a significant environmental effect, and is not subject to CEQA.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal B - Support community engagement and advocacy
Respectfully Submitted,
Trisha Isom, Housing Manager
Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
GACApplication Questions
GAC Scoring Questions & Scale
FY 21/22 Grants Summary
https://www.zoomgrants.com/programsetup2.asp?rfpid=4241&dtype=&f=

1. Lead Agency is:

Non Profit 501(c)(3)
Non Profit 501(c)(4)
Private School

2. Project Description: In 50 words or less, describe the proposed program/project, including the use of the funds and who will be served.

Example: The ABC Unified School District requests $5,000 to support "The Learning Project," a comprehensive youth service and leadership program for low-income youth.

3. This request will: (Select only one option below)
Launch a new service, program or facility
Continue to provide an existing service
Increase or improve quality of services provided
Expand services provided to a larger population or increase the capacity of a facility

4. Funding Priority (Select only one option below)
Strategic: One-time grants for innovative programs/projects, capital improvements or new initiatives Operational/Mission Support: Grants for programs/projects that demonstrate effectiveness addressing a community need
Small Request (up to $10,000): Grants which can go toward either new programs/projects or support existing operations which have demonstrated effectiveness at meeting communityneed

5. Community Need Areas: (Select only one option below) Food - Increased access to healthier food options for lower income communities Health and Wellness - Improved physical, mental and behavioral health, and wellness Community and Social Context - Improved access to arts and cultural resources for all and a kinder more inclusive and connected community
Education - More vocational training and educational opportunities for all ages Neighborhood and Physical Environment - Improved access to safe and affordable housing for all

6. Number of:

Board Members
Paid Staff F/T
Paid Staff P/T
Volunteers Total
Fiscal Year 23/24 Application Questions
https://www.zoomgrants.com/programsetup2.asp?rfpid=4241&dtype=&f=

7. Date Founded:

8. Organization's Mission:

9. What are the major goals of your organization?

10. What were the major accomplishments of the organization last fiscal year? Please list specific outcomes.

11. How does the organization use volunteers?

12. Describe the need for this project/program and evidence of community support.

13. Describe the population, number to be served, and how the proposed project/program differentiates from similar services in the community. Explain the processes used to ensure those being served are ROSEVILLE RESIDENTS and follow the funding guidelines.

Is the organization uniquely positioned to serve the community because of location, relationships, or staff skills? Include key supporters, volunteer hours, collaborators and donors.

14. Describe the project service area.

CBF funding is intended to benefit City of Roseville residents. If serving an area larger than the city, how will the organization identify costs allocated to serve Roseville residents?

15. Does the organization have collaborative partners in the provision of your proposed program/project? If yes, please describe the role/relationship of each partner in the provision of the proposed program/project.

Does the organization provide/accept referrals? Does the organization participate with other coordinating organizations or work with service, business, and/or government organizations?

16. Describe how this project/program aligns with Roseville City Council's current Strategic Plan.

The Strategic Plan can be found here: www.roseville.ca.us/government/city_council/strategic_plan_2021-2024

17. Define anticipated outcomes for this project/program. How will success be measured?

18. List below any previous funds awarded in the last five funding cycles by the Roseville Grants Advisory Commission and the purpose of funding.
https://www.zoomgrants.com/programsetup2.asp?rfpid=4241&dtype=&f=

19. If your organization received a FY2022-23 grant award, please provide the amount, funds spent to date and accomplishments so far. Also include the number of those served, other success measures and any challenges encountered in achieving the outcomes described in your grant application.

20. If full funding is not available, how will the organization be able to accomplish the project/program? How will goals be reduced? How will the program or project be affected?

21. Please list other funding received or requested for this project/program (include funder, amount received or requested, and status of request, if applicable). Also include any fundraisers or donations as well as financial support requested or received from governmental entities.

22. How will your organization reduce costs or generate additional revenue once grant funds are expended to ensure sustainability of this grant project/program?

23. If the grant money obtained is to be used to fund capital expenditure or property improvements, please briefly describe the item(s) needed and the itemized costs.

Capital expenditure is defined as any grant money that is used to acquire or upgrade a long-term asset that has a useful life of more than one (1) year.

24. If requesting capital for Property Improvement, does the organization own or lease the building or property to be improved?
Yes - Provide proof of ownership or copy of lease in Documents Tab No
Not Applicable

25. If requesting capital for Property Improvement or Capital Expenditure, have you included the required bids?
Yes
Not Applicable
Review Criteria for FY2023‐2024 Funding Cycle for
Citizens Benefit Fund and REACH Grant Applications
Grant Threshold Requirements
Applications will only be considered if:
 Applicant has submitted all required application documents by the application deadline.  Applicant has submitted required annual report(s) for FY2021‐2022 CBF and REACH grants.

Grant Application Scoring Questions and Scoring Scale
Scoring Questions Scoring
Scale

1. Application demonstrates the need for the project or program. 15

2. Application clearly defines the project/program and how success is measured. 15

3. Application reflects mission and meets the general requirements and guidelines for CBF, and/or REACH.
10 4. Requested funds achieve an impact on the identified need. 15

5. Application demonstrates evidence of community support. 10

6. Application clearly describes how the collaborative partners increase efficiency and efficacy of the grant.
10 7. Request is reasonable given the proposed project/program and the organization’s experience and capacity.
5 8. Additional funding support for this project/program is clearly identified. 5

9. Project budget is well defined and budget narrative explains how funding will meet project goals and objectives.
5 10. Project budget is reasonable in relation to the organization’s budget and demonstrates project sustainability.
10 TOTAL POINTS 100

ORGANIZATION GRANT

FUNDS USED ACCOMPLISHMENTS SUCCESS MEASURES
$20,000
Developed the Hybrid Workshop
to meet Covid restrictions which
will allow for future growth as we
are no longer limited by having to
physically attend each school site.

Survey of participants
$24,071
Grant funded housing for 300 people,
including veterans, chronically homeless,
transitional age youth and parenting youth
Utilized tools such as HMIS Portal
$12,627
Funds provided 30 new track lights and
LED bulbs to improve the quality of the
visitor experience, and 100 folding chairs
to expand seating for local community
events and groups that use the space.

Art sales revenue increased by
102% over the 5-year average
$11,934
Ability to open the new Campus Life Barn
where 400 low-income Roseville Teens,
over 3 events, interacted and socialized
in a healthy environment, learn new lifeskills, enjoy dinner, and some recreation.

Surveys of participants
$10,363
Funds enabled us to successfully close
18 Roseville Family Mentor cases
and assist each family in obtaining
stable housing and employment.

Monthly reports
$9,000
The new office space has helped
provided 331 hours of parent training
to local foster families, allowed us to
add 3 new staff members, 2 new board
members and enhanced collaboration
and organizational efficiency.

Saw growth in both programs and staff
Grant Advisory Commission
Citizens Benefit Fund &
Roseville Employees Annual Charitable Hearts
A total of $359,334 in grant funds were awarded to
$359,334 organizations for use from 21 July 2021 to June 2022.

ORGANIZATION GRANT

FUNDS USED ACCOMPLISHMENTS SUCCESS MEASURES
$16,363
The grant funded creation of two new
subprograms for teens that directly
addresses the needs for customized
mental health support resources
through a trauma informed approach.

Increased access to care and
improved patient care
$25,000
The number of people served in the
Roseville Community continues to
grow along with a 21% increase in
the number of services provided.

Pre/post surveys, assessment
scales and self-reports
$12,077
Approximately 70 citizens were
assisted through the volunteer
chaplain services as well as numerous
other officers and employees were
assisted by our command staff.

The Roseville PD Chief, department
supervisor and captains recently provided
feedback on the success of our program.
$37,954
Purchase two rider double pallet jacks
which improved operational efficiencies.

Over 8 million pounds of food was
distributed during the project period; an
increase of 20% from the previous year.

Food distribution increase 34% which
is indicated by the number of people
served and amount of food distributed
$1,000 Grant funded equipment for six adults
with disabilities from across Placer County
Were able to serve the same number
of individuals with less money
$9,358
Grant partially funded the dramatic
increase in rent for the fairgrounds
facility where we host our one-day
event to provide clothing and health
care education to veterans.

Increase in attendance at the first
even since the pandemic hit.

Roseville Historical Society
$5,000
Completion of 5 videos, documenting
Roseville’s history and important
historical figures of Roseville to be
shared at the Carnegie Museum as
well as classroom presentations.

The criteria set for each video was exceeded.
$20,792
Accommodated 8,140 household
visits to the Food Distribution Drive
during the grant period, providing the
ingredients to prepare 219,780 meals.

Annual survey regarding food security

ORGANIZATION GRANT

FUNDS USED ACCOMPLISHMENTS SUCCESS MEASURES
$22,622 In total, 43,734 meals were provided
to 178 Roseville seniors Exceeded goal to serve 150 seniors by 12% Sierra College Foundation
$16,292
Provided 257 Care Packs to at-risk college
students including 38% former foster
youth and 62% underserved students
Student persistence/graduation rates
$30,000
Grant allowed for stronger engagement
in follow up services in response
to 392 DV calls relayed from the
Roseville Police Department.

Increased number of referred clients
that engage in services and the
ability to meet emergency needs
$27,612
Grant assisted with comprehensive
case management, mental health
services and successful housing through
“Ready to Rent” classes and helped
29 guests from Roseville move into
permanent supportive housing.

Using HMIS data to show success of clients
$10,000
Began Grow a Row which
inspired many local growers to
make property available for
Additional sites and helped
expand the program.

There was a direct increase in number
of bouquets created and delivered as
well as the ability to continue operations
during the pandemic and aftermath
$14,000
Over 300 volunteers shopped
to provide gift bags worth $150
each to almost 100 children.

Number of children helped, value
of clothing provided increased
$23,269
Grant provided nearly 200 instructor
led groups and programs with and
attendance rate of 1,100. Over 700
were Placer County residents and
350 of those were from Roseville.

The success of our program was measured
by key performance indicators

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2444
File #: 0102-10
Title: Resolution - Shelley Gollender
Contact: Blair Hutchison 916-774-5266 [email protected] Meeting Date: 12/7/2022
Item #: 6.38.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Commend Shelley Gollender for her 15 years of outstanding service and dedication to the City of Roseville, congratulate her on her many accomplishments, and wish her a long, healthy and enjoyable retirement.

BACKGROUND
Not applicable.

FISCAL IMPACT
Not applicable.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Ceremonial documents meet the above criteria and are not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Not applicable.

Respectfully Submitted,
Blair Hutchison, City Clerk Technician
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2356
File #: 0800-03 & 0215
Title: Roseville Electric Energy Surcharge - Roseville Municipal Code Amendment Contact: Joanna Cucchi 916-746-1609 [email protected] Meeting Date: 12/7/2022
Item #: 7.1.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council introduce for first reading an ordinance approving amendments to Sections 14.24.040, 14.24.050 and 14.24.055 of Chapter 14.24 of the Roseville Municipal Code to reflect Roseville Electric Utility’s recommended 8% energy cost surcharge for all customer groups effective February 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024.

BACKGROUND
Roseville Electric Utility’s mission is to deliver safe, reliable electricity at competitive rates with exceptional service. This mission shapes how the electric utility conducts its day-to-day business operations and impacts the electric service provided to over 66,000 business and residential customers in the City of Roseville. This mission is balanced with the electric utility’s ability to align operating costs with expected revenues so that the utility remains in a position of financial strength in order to serve the community in the future. Reviewing and recommending adjustments to electric rates is essential in delivering on the utility’s mission.

RATE PROPOSAL
Roseville Electric Utility and utilities throughout the country have seen unprecedented cost increases in energy costs. In the 12 months since the last rate proposal, the energy markets have seen price increases of 200% to 300%. The utility utilizes a variety of financial and risk tools to mitigate the impact to customers of these types of price swings. However, due to the magnitude and speed at which these price changes have occurred, the utility is unable to balance its revenues and expenses with the current rates.

Since the 2021 rate action, power supply expenses at Roseville Electric have increased approximately 35%. Power supply expenses are two-thirds of the utility budget and this increase cannot be absorbed within the current revenue expectations. Due to these external drivers, Roseville is proposing an eight percent energy cost surcharge effective February 1, 2023 through December 24, 2024. This 23 month surcharge will give the utility the time to determine if this high cost energy market is permanent or transitory in nature.

The proposed eight percent surcharge is only to recover the increase in power supply expenses.

The other expenses of the utility including labor, operations, and capital investments are not included in this rate action.

The utility understands that this proposal would impact low income customers disproportionally.

The energy cost surcharge recommendation would exempt those customers who participate in the low-income, senior, and medical rate reduction programs. The approximate cost of the proposed exemption is $140,000 per year. This exemption will be paid for with State-mandated public benefits funds. These funds can only be used for energy efficiency, research and development, and low income programs.

The proposed surcharge is detailed below.

Customer Type Proposed Energy Surcharge
Residential 8%
Small Commercial 8%
Medium Commercial 8%
Large Commercial 8%
Industrial 8%

PUBLIC OUTREACH AND CUSTOMER FEEDBACK
The Roseville Electric Utility energy surcharge proposal included a significant amount of public outreach. As a community-owned utility, rate proposal outreach is an intentionally collaborative process that offers customers numerous opportunities to engage with the electric utility. Customer feedback and participation in this process is critically important to the successful adoption and broader understanding of the proposed rate changes. Some of the noteworthy outreach events and communications for this rate proposal for community engagement included:

Public Workshops (3)
Sun City Government Affairs Meeting
Roseville Coalition of Neighborhood Associations (RCONA) Board Meeting Largest electric commercial customers
Roseville Area Chamber of Commerce
Roseville Electric webpage
Social media (Facebook and Nextdoor)
Throughout our public outreach, customer feedback centered on a few common concerns:

Concern that new housing developments are driving this proposed increase. As discussed above the sole driver of this increase is the price of procuring energy for customers.

Concern about increased costs for all household expenses, but a general understanding of the reason for the increase.

Concern about the surcharge being permanent.

General compliments of service reliability.

FISCAL IMPACT
The proposed rate changes will result in approximately $25 million in additional revenue for the Electric Fund over the 23 month implementation. The proposed change aligns the revenues collected from customers with the costs of operating the utility to maintaining financial strength and stability consistent with City Council priorities.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of amendments to the Roseville Municipal Code meet the above criteria and are not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world
Respectfully Submitted,
Joanna Cucchi, Interim Electric Finance Administrator
Daniel Beans, Electric Utility Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Ordinance
ORDINANCE NO. ____

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AMENDING SECTIONS

14.24.040, 14.24.050 AND 14.24.055 OF CHAPTER 14.24 OF TITLE 14 OF THE

ROSEVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING ELECTRICAL ENERGY
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. Section 14.24.040 of Chapter 14.24 of Title 14 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

14.24.040 Residential rates.

A. Effective January 1, 2022, the residential rate applied to service within a monthly billing period and charged to residential customers shall be as follows:

1. For each residential customer meter:
a. Basic service charge: a basic service charge of $28.00 per meter, per billing month. b. Energy charge applied to electricity consumption in kWh in accordance with the following tiers:
i. Tier 1—Up to 500 kWh: $0.0959 per kWh;
ii. Tier 2—Greater than 500 kWh: $0.1452 per kWh.
c. California renewable energy requirement surcharge: $0.0056 per kWh. 2 d. California greenhouse gas emission reduction requirement surcharge: $0.0002 per kWh.
e. Hydroelectric adjustment: the annually adjusted charge or credit on residential billings that will be applied from July 1st to June 30th each fiscal year, as provided in Section 14.24.052 of this chapter.

B. Effective January 1, 2023, the residential rate applied to service within a monthly billing period and charged to residential customers shall be as follows:

1. For each residential customer meter:
a. Basic service charge: a basic service charge of $30.00 per meter, per billing month. b. Energy charge applied to electricity consumption in kWh:
i. Tier 1—Up to 500 kWh: $0.0989 per kWh;
ii. Tier 2—Greater than 500 kWh: $0.1468 per kWh.
c. California renewable energy requirement surcharge: $0.0056 per kWh. d. California greenhouse gas emission reduction requirement surcharge: $0.0002 per kWh.
e. Hydroelectric adjustment: the annually adjusted charge or credit on residential billings that will be applied from July 1st to June 30th each fiscal year, as provided in Section 14.24.052 of this chapter.
3 f. Energy cost surcharge: effective February 1, 2023 to December 31, 2024 an energy cost surcharge of $0.01354 per kWh on residential metered energy. The energy cost surcharge is not applicable to senior citizen rate reduction, low-income rate reduction, and medical support rate reduction customers.

SECTION 2. Section 14.24.050 of Chapter 14.24 of Title 14 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

14.24.050 General service rates.

A. Effective January 1, 2022, the general service rates applied to service within a monthly billing period and charged to general service customers shall be as follows:

1. Small General Service (GS-1) Rate. The GS-1 monthly rates on monthly billings will be as follows:

Basic Service Charge $41.00 per meter, per month
Energy Charge
Winter $0.0995 per kWh
Summer $0.1156 per kWh
California Renewable Energy Requirement
Surcharge
$0.0056 per kWh
California Greenhouse Gas Emission
Reduction Requirement Surcharge
$0.0002 per kWh
Hydroelectric Adjustment Annually adjusted charge or credit on billings that will be applied from July 1st to June 30th
each fiscal year, as prescribed in
Section 14.24.052
4 2. Medium General Service (GS-2) Rate. The GS-2 monthly rates on monthly billings will be as follows:

Basic Service Charge $65.00 per meter, per month
Demand Charge $6.16 per kW
Energy Charge
Winter $0.1047 per kWh
S Summer $0.1258 per kWh
California Renewable Energy Requirement
Surcharge
$0.0056 per kWh
California Greenhouse Gas Emission
Reduction Requirement Surcharge
$0.0002 per kWh
Hydroelectric Adjustment Annually adjusted charge or credit on billings that will be applied from July 1st to June 30th
each fiscal year, as prescribed in
Section 14.24.052

3. Large General Service (GS-3) Rate. TOU rates are mandatory for all customers receiving service in the GS-3 rate classification. Customers not having the necessary equipment to meter consumption on a TOU basis will be charged at the GS-2 rate until the necessary equipment is installed. Customers with facilities where the necessary TOU equipment is infeasible or impractical to employ, as determined by Roseville Electric, will be billed at the GS2 rate. Discounts for primary services are provided pursuant to Section 14.24.050(D). 5 The GS-3 monthly rates on monthly billings will be as follows:

Basic Service Charge $541.00 per meter, per month
Demand Charge
Winter $6.60 per kW
Summer $11.57 per kW
Energy Charge
Winter
Off Peak $0.0699 per kWh
On Peak $0.0913 per kWh
Super Peak $0.0913 per kWh
Summer
Off Peak $0.0913 per kWh
On Peak $0.1125 per kWh
Super Peak $0.1444 per kWh
California Renewable Energy Requirement
Surcharge
$0.0056 per kWh
California Greenhouse Gas Emission
Reduction Requirement Surcharge
$0.0002 per kWh
Hydroelectric Adjustment Annually adjusted charge or credit on billings that will be applied from July 1st to June 30th
each fiscal year, as prescribed in
Section 14.24.052

4. Very Large General Service (GS-4) Rate. TOU rates are mandatory for all customers receiving service in the GS-4 rate classification. Discounts for primary services are defined in Section 14.24.050(D).

The GS-4 TOU monthly rates on monthly billings will be as follows:
6 Basic Service Charge $616.00 per meter, per month
Demand Charge
Winter $6.71 per kW
Summer $11.51 per kW
Energy Charge
Winter
Off Peak $0.0691 per kWh
On Peak $0.0884 per kWh
Super Peak $0.0884 per kWh
Summer
Off Peak $0.0901 per kWh
On Peak $0.1094 per kWh
Super Peak $0.1432 per kWh
California Renewable Energy Requirement
Surcharge
$0.0056 per kWh
California Greenhouse Gas Emission
Reduction Requirement Surcharge
$0.0002 per kWh
Hydroelectric Adjustment Annually adjusted charge or credit on billings that will be applied from July 1st to June 30th
each fiscal year, as prescribed in
Section 14.24.052
B. Effective January 1, 2023, the general service rates applied to service within a monthly billing period and charged to general service customers shall be as follows:

1. Small General Services (GS-1) Rate. The GS-1 monthly rates on monthly billings will be as follows:
7 Basic Service Charge $44.00 per meter, per month
Energy Charge
Winter $0.1017per kWh
S Summer $0.1181 per kWh
California Renewable Energy Requirement
Surcharge
$0.0056 per kWh
California Greenhouse Gas Emission
Reduction Requirement Surcharge
$0.0002 per kWh
Hydroelectric Adjustment Annually adjusted charge or credit on billings that will be applied from July 1st to June 30th
each fiscal year, as prescribed in
Section 14.24.052
Energy Cost Surcharge Effective February 1, 2023 to December 31, 2024 an energy cost surcharge of $0.01235 per
kWh.

2. Medium General Service (GS-2) Rate. The GS-2 monthly rates on monthly billings will be as follows:

Basic Service Charge $65.00 per meter, per month
Demand Charge $6.16 per kW
Energy Charge
Winter $0.1066 per kWh
S Summer $0.1282 per kWh
California Renewable Energy Requirement
Surcharge
$0.0056 per kWh
California Greenhouse Gas Emission
Reduction Requirement Surcharge
$0.0002 per kWh
Hydroelectric Adjustment Annually adjusted charge or credit on billings that will be applied from July 1st to June 30th
8 each fiscal year, as prescribed in
Section 14.24.052
Energy Cost Surcharge Effective February 1, 2023 to December 31, 2024 an energy cost surcharge of $0.01143 per
kWh.

3. Large General Service (GS-3) Rate. TOU rates are mandatory for all customers receiving service in the GS-3 rate classification. Customers not having the necessary equipment to meter consumption on a TOU basis will be charged at the GS-2 rate until the necessary equipment is installed. Customers with facilities where the necessary TOU equipment is infeasible or impractical to employ, as determined by Roseville Electric, will be billed at the GS2 rate. Discounts for primary services are provided pursuant to Section 14.24.050(D).

The GS-3 monthly rates on monthly billings will be as follows:

Basic Service Charge $561.00 per meter, per month
Demand Charge
Winter $6.60 per kW
Summer $11.57 per kW
Energy Charge
Winter
Off Peak $0.0717 per kWh
On Peak $0.0936 per kWh
Super Peak $0.0936 per kWh
Summer
Off Peak $0.0936 per kWh
On Peak $0.1153 per kWh
9 Super Peak $0.1480 per kWh
California Renewable Energy Requirement
Surcharge
$0.0056 per kWh
California Greenhouse Gas Emission
Reduction Requirement Surcharge
$0.0002 per kWh
Hydroelectric Adjustment Annually adjusted charge or credit on billings that will be applied from July 1st to June 30th
each fiscal year, as prescribed in
Section 14.24.052
Energy Cost Surcharge Effective February 1, 2023 to December 31, 2024 an energy cost surcharge of $0.00992 per
kWh.

4. Very Large General Service (GS-4) Rate. TOU rates are mandatory for all customers receiving service in the GS-4 rate classification. Discounts for primary services are defined in Section 14.24.050(D).

The GS-4 TOU monthly rates on monthly billings will be as follows:

Basic Service Charge $641.00 per meter, per month
Demand Charge
Winter $6.71 per kW
Summer $11.51 per kW
Energy Charge
Winter
Off Peak $0.0709 per kWh
On Peak $0.0907 per kWh
Super Peak $0.0907 per kWh
Summer
Off Peak $0.0924 per kWh
10 On Peak $0.1122 per kWh
Super Peak $0.1469 per kWh
California Renewable Energy Requirement
Surcharge
$0.0056 per kWh
California Greenhouse Gas Emission
Reduction Requirement Surcharge
$0.0002 per kWh
Hydroelectric Adjustment Annually adjusted charge or credit on billings that will be applied from July 1st to June 30th
each fiscal year, as prescribed in
Section 14.24.052
Energy Cost Surcharge Effective February 1, 2023 to December 31, 2024 an energy cost surcharge of $0.00843 per
kWh.

C. Aggregation of Demand. Accounts with multiple GS-3 service, or a combination of GS-3 and GS-4 service that combine to exceed 1,000 kW of billed demand in any six months of the prior calendar year will receive a discount of $0.003 per kWh on the GS-3 service total monthly billed energy.

D. Primary Service. Service provided at 12,000 volts or higher under delivery arrangements approved by Roseville Electric shall receive a discount of two percent of the energy and demand charges.

E. Contract Rates. The city reserves the right to negotiate and provide, by contract, service at rates other than those specified in the municipal code.

F. Standby Service Rate.

1. Applicability. This service is applicable to any general service customer who utilizes, in whole or in part, generating facilities, as defined in Roseville Electric Rule 21 11 standards for interconnection, other than solar, wind or solar/wind hybrid customer-owned generating facilities, to supply all or part of such customer’s power requirements, and where:
a. Based upon the manufacturer’s nameplate rating the generating facilities do not exceed 100 percent of their projected demand as determined by Roseville Electric. b. Pursuant to Rule 21 standards for interconnection, generating facilities are connected to the city’s electrical distribution system. The customer shall not operate such customer-owned generating facilities in parallel with the city’s electrical system unless otherwise approved in advance by Roseville Electric.

An interconnection agreement between the city and customer is required for service under this rate, when the customer-owned generating facilities are interconnected with the city’s electrical system.

2. Effective January 1, 2017 the standby service charge ($/kW of “rated capacity” per month) shall be as follows:

Secondary voltage $6.71
Primary voltage $6.58
“Rated capacity” is a fixed kilowatts value determined by the manufacturer’s rating of the generator unit. In addition to the auxiliary or standby service rate, the city will continue to bill for all applicable charges under the appropriate rate schedule, including, but not limited to, basic service, energy and demand charges.
12 G. Demand/kWh Criteria. Service provided under general service rates shall be periodically evaluated for compliance with rate classification monthly demand and/or kWh criteria. If the monthly demand and/or kWh criteria are not satisfied, the service may be transferred to the appropriate general service rate effective with the next available billing cycle.

Exceptions are at the discretion of Roseville Electric or by a customized customer contract (if applicable). Compliance with monthly demand/kWh criteria shall be determined in accordance with Section 14.24.020 rate classification.

H. Advanced Metering Service Charge. The advanced metering service charge is required for all GS-2 customers who have access to the city’s online energy profiler system. GS2 service, whose maximum demand is equal to or greater than 250 kW in two or more summer months (as defined in Section 14.24.021) in the prior calendar year, will receive a special load profile meter, and the ability to remotely access usage data. Customers with facilities where the necessary metering equipment is infeasible or impractical to employ, as determined by Roseville Electric, will be exempted from this charge. The city will charge a monthly service fee of $42.00 to cover maintenance, software support and related expenses.

SECTION 3. Section 14.24.055 of Chapter 14.24 of Title 14 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

14.24.055 Outdoor, street lighting, traffic signal, and electric vehicle charging rates.

A. Outdoor Lighting Rate. All unmetered service including outdoor lighting service, will be charged in accordance with engineering determinations made by Roseville Electric.

Service furnished under this rate may be discontinued at any location where the city’s overhead 13 facilities are relocated, converted to underground, or the space on the pole utilized by the light is needed by the city for other facilities.

B. Street Lighting Rate. Consumption on city-owned streetlights is not metered. The base charge is set using estimated consumption. For the city-owned street lighting account, the monthly billing will be as follows:

1. Base Charge.
a. Effective January 1, 2022, a charge of $17,539.08 per month. b. Effective January 1, 2023, a charge of $17,889.87 per month.

C. Traffic Signal Rate. For all city-owned traffic signal electric service, the monthly billing will be as follows:

1. Effective January 1, 2022.

Customer Charge $34.41 per meter, per month
Energy Charge $0.0339 per kWh
California Renewable Energy
Requirement Surcharge $0.0056 per kWh
California Greenhouse Gas Emission
Reduction Requirement Surcharge $0.0002 per kWh
Hydroelectric Adjustment
Annually adjusted charge or credit on billings that
will be applied from July 1st to June 30th each fiscal
year, as prescribed in Section 14.24.052

2. Effective January 1, 2023.
14 Customer Charge $35.10 per meter, per month
Energy Charge $0.0345 per kWh
California Renewable Energy
Requirement Surcharge $0.0056 per kWh
California Greenhouse Gas Emission
Reduction Requirement Surcharge $0.0002 per kWh
Hydroelectric Adjustment
Annually adjusted charge or credit on billings that
will be applied from July 1st to June 30th each fiscal
year, as prescribed in Section 14.24.052
D. City-Owned Electric Vehicle Charging Rate. For city-owned electric vehicle charging stations, the rate will be $0.30 per kWh.

E. Pole Attachment Rate. This rate applies to general service accounts attached to unmetered Roseville assets where the consumption of electricity is small or can be predetermined with reasonable accuracy by reference to the capacity of equipment served and the hours of operation. Roseville Electric will calculate electricity consumption in lieu of providing metering equipment.

1. Effective January 1, 2022.

Basic Service Charge $10.49 per attachment, per month
Energy Charge $0.1160 per kWh
California Renewable Energy
Requirement Surcharge $0.0056 per kWh
California Greenhouse Gas Emission
Reduction Requirement Surcharge $0.0002 per kWh
15 2. Effective January 1, 2023
Basic Service Charge $10.70 per attachment, per month
Energy Charge $0.1184 per kWh
California Renewable Energy
Requirement Surcharge $0.0056 per kWh
California Greenhouse Gas Emission
Reduction Requirement Surcharge $0.0002 per kWh
F. All rates in subsection A of this section will increase or decrease at the same percentage as the percentage change applied to the rates for the GS-1 rate classification.

G. Energy Cost Surcharge: effective February 1, 2023 to December 31, 2024 an energy cost surcharge of $0.00350 per kWh will be applied to all metered energy by customers defined in this section.

H. Energy Cost Surcharge: effective February 1, 2023 to December 31, 2024 an energy cost surcharge of $1431.19 per month will be applied to the Street Lighting rate defined in this section.

SECTION 4. This ordinance shall be effective at the expiration of thirty (30) days from the date of adoption.

SECTION 5. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause this ordinance to be published in full at least once within fourteen (14) days after it is adopted in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, or shall within fourteen (14) days after its adoption cause this ordinance 16 to be posted in full in at least three (3) public places in the City and enter in the Ordinance Book a certificate stating the time and place of said publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of _______________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2427
File #: 0400-04-18 & 0400-08
Title:

North Industrial Plan Area Parcel 56 (2200 Freedom Way) Blue Oaks Commerce Center – Major Project Permit Stage 1 Modification and Major Project Permit Stage 2 Appeal
Contact: Escarlet Mar 916-774-5247 [email protected] Meeting Date: 12/7/2022
Item #: 8.1.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Based on the September 22, 2022 Planning Commission hearing, staff recommends the City Council deny the appeal of the Planning Commission’s approval of entitlements related to the Blue Oaks Commerce Center project and take the following actions:

1. Consider the Addendum to the Blue Oaks Commerce Center Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration; and

2. Adopt a resolution denying the appeal from the September 22, 2022 approval by the Planning Commission; adopting the two (2) findings of fact and approving the Major Project Permit Stage 1 Modification subject to ten (10) conditions of approval; and adopting the two (2) findings of fact and approving the Major Project Permit Stage 2 subject to ninety-three (93) conditions of approval.

BACKGROUND
This Council Communication provides a summary of the project, the Planning Commission hearing and the appeal. A detailed project background and evaluation is provided in the Planning Commission staff report, included as Attachment 1.

The project site is located at 2200, 2301, and 2201 Freedom Way, at the southwest corner of Blue Oaks Boulevard and Fidelity Way. The project has a zoning designation of General Industrial (M2) and a land use designation of General Industrial (IND) and is located on Parcel 56 of the North Industrial Planning Area (NIPA). The project site is bordered by Blue Oaks Boulevard to the north, a developed office building and an undeveloped parcel to the east, developed industrial uses to the south and Industrial Avenue and a railroad corridor to the west.

Project Description
The applicant requests approval of an MPP Stage 1 Modification to change the approved site plan by increasing the square footage of the industrial buildings on the site by approximately 50,000 square feet. The modification will also reorient the layout of the project site and reduce the overall number of industrial buildings. Furthermore, the project includes an MPP Stage 2 to evaluate the architecture and landscape plans of the four (4) new industrial buildings and associated site improvements. The future tenants of the buildings are unknown at this time, but it is anticipated that uses will include warehousing, light manufacturing, and/or distribution with office space. A detailed description and evaluation of the project is included in the Planning Commission staff report (see Attachment 1). The project site plan is included as Exhibit B.

Summary of Planning Commission Meeting
The project was heard by the Planning Commission on September 22, 2022. The Commission asked questions relating to the high volume of traffic along Blue Oaks Boulevard and whether any future CIP improvements are proposed on Blue Oaks, near the project site. Staff responded that the traffic associated with the proposed project is consistent with the citywide traffic model and that the widening of the Blue Oaks bridge is identified as a future CIP project. No public comments were provided during the hearing.

The Planning Commission considered the item and voted to approve the Major Project Permit Stage 1 Modification subject to ten (10) conditions of approval and the Major Project Permit Stage 2 subject to ninety-three (93) conditions of approval. The motion passed with a vote of 6 ayes, 0 nays, and 1 absent.

Appeal
On September 30, 2022, the City Clerk’s office received a notice of appeal of the Planning Commission’s action on the project (see Attachment 2). The appeal was submitted by the Lozeau Drury law firm, representing the Laborers’ International Union of North America, Local Union No. 185. The appeal letter alleged the project should have completed an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration instead of an Addendum because mitigation measures are necessary to address the project’s significant cumulative air quality impacts and air pollution emissions and energy usage.

This Council Communication provides a summary of the issues raised in the appeal.

Response I, Air Quality
The appeal asserts the Project may have potentially significant cumulative air quality impacts that were not previously analyzed in the 2010 NIPA Blue Oaks Commerce Center Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (NIPA Blue Oaks Commerce Center IS/MND) and new mitigation measures would substantially reduce one or more significant cumulative air quality impacts.

The commenter asserts that since the adoption of the NIPA Blue Oaks Commerce Center IS/MND there are new standard mitigation measures related to distribution centers and warehouses that would reduce the cumulative air quality impacts of the Project. However, the commenter fails to provide Project-specific impacts associated with air quality that would warrant new mitigation measures. According to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines § 15162, an Addendum to a previously certified and adopted negative declaration or environmental impact report may be prepared for a project if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred. As described in the Addendum, the increase of approximately 50,000 square-feet does not result in a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact which would warrant an IS/MND or EIR. The Project air quality impacts associated with the increase in square footage of the Project are consistent with the development scenarios previously analyzed in the NIPA Blue Oaks Commerce Center IS/MND. Furthermore, current Placer County Air Pollution Control District (PCAPCD) regulations, which are designed to ensure compliance with air quality standards, apply to the Project. Based on this information and the applicable mitigation measures previously outlined in the NIPA Blue Oaks Commerce Center IS/MND, the Project would not require any new mitigation measures.

Response II, Air Pollution & Energy
The appeal asserts the Project did not appropriately analyze the increase in energy usage associated with the increase in the building square footage.

The commenter provided no analysis or evidence that would prove their assertion, but rather the commenter makes a speculation and a general statement that the increase in the Project building square footage would generate an increase in energy usage because of an increase in trucks. The Addendum acknowledges that Energy was not previously analyzed in the 2010 NIPA Blue Oaks Commerce Center IS/MND because Energy is a new issue area that is now required to be examined. However, based on the Project’s land use designation, the assumed development was evaluated as part of the citywide analysis prepared for the General Plan Update EIR, which assessed the energy demand and determined that the Project would not result in substantial unplanned demands, nor would it result in inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary consumption of energy. The Project is within the scope of development assumed within the General Plan analysis. Thus, emissions from the project are not a new, project-specific impact requiring analysis, and per the tiering provisions of CEQA additional environmental analysis is not required.

It is explicitly stated in the General Plan Update EIR that the EIR will be used by future projects for this tiering.

Public Outreach
The proposed project was distributed to all internal and external agencies and departments who have requested such notice, and all comments or recommended conditions of approval have been incorporated into the project, as appropriate. Notice of both the Planning Commission hearing and the City Council hearing was published in the Roseville Press Tribune and on the Roseville Coalition of Neighborhood Associations (RCONA) website, and mailed to all property owners and residents within a 300 foot radius of the project site. As of the writing of this report, staff has not received any public comment regarding the project.

Conclusion
Based on the analysis, the proposed project is consistent with the City’s General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, North Roseville Area Design Guidelines, Community Design Guidelines, and the prior Blue Oaks Commerce Center project approvals. Therefore, staff recommends that the City Council deny the appeal of the Planning Commission’s approval of entitlements and approve the Major Permit Project Stage 1 Modification and Major Project Permit Stage 2.

FISCAL IMPACT
The development of the site with four (4) new industrial buildings and associated site improvements will not result in negative impacts to the City’s General Fund as it will develop two (2) vacant parcels with four (4) new industrial buildings.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The City of Roseville, acting as Lead Agency, prepared an Addendum to the Blue Oaks Commerce Center Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (Adopted on May 27, 2010) for the Blue Oaks Commerce Center project (File #PL22-0101) consistent with CEQA Section 15164. This Addendum (see Exhibit A) evaluated the impact of development of the Blue Oaks Commerce Center, which includes the project site. The proposed project is substantially consistent with the Project previously evaluated in the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (Adopted on May 27, 2010) and no new significant effects are expected to occur. In the September 30, 2022 appeal, Lozeau Drury challenges the determination that an Addendum was the appropriate environmental document for the Blue Oaks Commerce Center project and that the City should prepare a subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration in lieu of the Addendum.

However, the appeal letter does not offer any substantial evidence to support the claim for a subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration. As mentioned above, in the analysis of the appeal, staff is confident that the Addendum adequately evaluated the Project and concluded that it would not result in any new or substantially more severe environmental impacts. Based on the analysis contained in the Addendum, the Addendum is the appropriate environmental document for this project.

Prior to the December 7
th City Council hearing for the project, the City received a letter from Buchalter Law Group (see Attachment 3), representing Schnitzer Properties, concurring with the City’s CEQA determination that an Addendum was the appropriate environmental document for CEQA compliance, and requesting the City Council adopt the Addendum to the Blue Oaks Commerce Center Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration.

Therefore, staff recommends the City Council consider the proposed Addendum to the Blue Oaks Commerce Center Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal D - Enhance economic vitality
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Escarlet Mar, Associate Planner
Mike Isom, Development Services Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Attachment 1 Planning Commission Staff Report
Attachment 2Appeal
Attachment 3 Buchalter Letter on behalf of Schnitzer Properties Attachment 4 Vicinity Map
Resolution 22-440
Exhibit A Addendum to the Blue Oaks Commerce Center Mitigated Negative Declaration Exhibit B Site Plan
Exhibit C Preliminary Grading Plan
Exhibit D Preliminary Utility Plan
Exhibit E Topographic & Boundary Survey
Exhibit F Landscape Plan
Exhibit G Floor Plan
Exhibit H Elevations
Exhibit I Site Lighting Plan & Photometric
Exhibit J Materials and Color Board

PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING September 22, 2022
Prepared by: Escarlet Mar, Associate Planner
ITEM 6.2: Major Project Permit Stage 1 Modification and Major Project Permit Stage 2 – 2200 Freedom Way – NIPA PCL 56 – Blue Oaks Commerce Center – File #PL22-0101

REQUEST
The applicant requests approval of a Major Project Permit (MPP) Stage 1 Modification and MPP Stage 2 to allow construction of four (4) industrial buildings totaling approximately 310,000 square feet in size, which will be located on two (2) parcels totaling 23.94-acres in size.

Applicant – Jennifer Kimura, VLMK Engineering + Design
Property Owner – Harsch Investment Properties II, LLC

SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Division recommends the Planning Commission take the following actions:

1. Consider the Addendum to the Blue Oaks Commerce Center Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration; and

2. Adopt the two (2) findings of fact and approve the Major Project Permit Stage 1 Modification subject to ten (10) conditions of approval; and

3. Adopt the two (2) findings of fact and approve the Major Project Permit Stage 2 subject to ninetythree (93) conditions of approval.

SUMMARY OF OUTSTANDING ISSUES
There are no outstanding issues associated with this request. The applicant has reviewed and is in agreement with all recommended conditions of approval.

BACKGROUND
The project site is located at 2200, 2301, and 2201 Freedom Way, at the southwest corner of Blue Oaks Boulevard and Fidelity Way (see Figure 1). On June 1, 2022, planning staff approved a Voluntary Merger (File# PL22-0059) to merge Parcel 4 (017-123-083) and Parcel 5 (017-123-084) of the Blue Oaks Commerce Center Subdivision Parcel Map into one (1) parcel. As of this writing, the lot merger has been recorded. The project has a zoning designation of General Industrial (M2) and a land use designation of General Industrial (IND) and is located on Parcel 56 of the North Industrial Planning Area (NIPA). The North Roseville Area Design Guidelines were adopted in order to influence the general character of development within the NIPA. The project site is bordered by Blue Oaks Boulevard to the north, a developed office building and an undeveloped parcel to the east, developed industrial uses to the south and Industrial Avenue and a railroad corridor to the west.

On May 27, 2010, the Planning Commission approved a Major Project Permit (MPP) Stage 1 and a Tentative Subdivision Map for development of the Blue Oaks Commerce Center project with a 575,505 square feet office, industrial and retail complex (File# 2007PL-039) (see Figure 2 below). An Initial Study leading to a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared as part of the MPP Stage 1 and Tentative Subdivision Map for the project to evaluate the environmental impacts of developing NIPA PCL 56, which was adopted by the Planning Commission.

CC ATTACHMENT 1
NIPA PCL 56 – Blue Oaks Commerce Center, 2200 Freedom Way; File #PL22-0101 Planning Commission – September 22, 2022 – Page 2 of 20 Figure 2: Approved Blue Oaks Commerce Center Site Plan (File# 2007PL-039) Figure 1: Project Location
Project Site
Industrial Avenue
Blue Oaks Boulevard
Washington Boulevard
NIPA PCL 56 – Blue Oaks Commerce Center, 2200 Freedom Way; File #PL22-0101 Planning Commission – September 22, 2022 – Page 3 of 20 On October 23, 2014, the Planning Commission approved a modification to the MPP Stage 1 site plan to allow the elimination of the retail portion of the project and replace 80,724 square feet of industrial uses with an approximately 122,385 square foot three story office building for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) (see Figure 3). A MPP Stage 2 was also approved for the FBI Office building, which approved the building architecture, site grading, and on-site landscaping. The MPP Stage 1 entitlement approved in 2010 included conceptual landscape plans for the Blue Oaks Commerce Center. The landscape plans were deemed to be consistent with the North Roseville Area Design Guidelines (NRADG). The NRADG was adopted in 1992 and does not address current water efficient landscape requirements. On May 24, 2016, the Planning Manager approved an Administrative Permit to modify the master landscape plan for the Blue Oaks Commerce Center to include more drought tolerant species and meet current water efficiency standards.

Figure 3: Blue Oaks Commerce Center Modified Site Plan (red) Proposed Project
The proposed project is located on Parcel 1, 4, and 5 as illustrated in Figure 4. The total area of the project site is approximately 23.94 acres. The revised project will allow the development of four (4) industrial buildings totaling approximately 310,000 square feet in size with associated parking, lighting, and landscaping (see Figure 5). The eastern corner parcel of the previously approved Blue Oaks Commerce Center will remain unchanged with this application.

The request for an MPP Stage 1 Modification would change the approved site plan by increasing the square footage of the industrial buildings on the site by approximately 50,000 square feet. The modification will also reorient the layout of the project site and reduce the overall number of industrial buildings. Lastly, the project includes an MPP Stage 2 to evaluate the architecture and landscape plans of the four (4) new industrial buildings and associated site improvements. The future tenants of the buildings are unknown at this time, but it is anticipated that uses will include warehousing, light manufacturing, and/or distribution with office space.

NIPA PCL 56 – Blue Oaks Commerce Center, 2200 Freedom Way; File #PL22-0101 Planning Commission – September 22, 2022 – Page 4 of 20 Figure 4: Blue Oaks Commerce Center Parcel Maps Figure 5: Overall Conceptual Site Plan
Previously Approved
Not part of this Project
NIPA PCL 56 – Blue Oaks Commerce Center, 2200 Freedom Way; File #PL22-0101 Planning Commission – September 22, 2022 – Page 5 of 20 EVALUATION The proposed project is being evaluated through the Major Project Permit entitlement process. The intent of the MPP process is to streamline the review of large and diverse projects that could be constructed over a period of several years. The MPP process allows for the resolution of site issues prior to the review of more detailed architectural and landscape plans that may not be finalized at the time the site plan is ready. In accordance with the City’s MPP Section of the Zoning Ordinance, the MPP review process is segregated into three separate stages. The evaluation section of this report includes an analysis of the requested MPP Stage 1 Modification and MPP Stage 2. Each entitlement is analyzed for its consistency with the goals and policies of the applicable regulations, including the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance, the Community Design Guidelines, the North Industrial Planning Area, and the North Roseville Area Design Guidelines.

Section 19.82.040 of the City of Roseville Zoning Ordinance describes the procedures for an amendment to a Major Project Permit. According to Section 19.82.040(C), all amendments that are not considered minor shall be reviewed in the same manner as the initial approval. The proposed request includes modifying the site plan and constructing four (4) new industrial buildings. This modification does not meet the minor modification criteria and; therefore, requires final action by the Planning Commission subject to the findings for a Major Project Permit Stage 1. The required findings are listed below in italicized, bold text and are followed by an evaluation.

The findings for a MPP Stage 1 (or modification of same) are as follows:

1. The Preliminary Development Plan is consistent with the General Plan, applicable Specific Plan, and adopted City Design Guidelines; and

2. The design and installation of the Preliminary Development Plan shall not be detrimental to the public health and safety, or be materially detrimental to the public welfare.

The findings for the MPP Stage 2 are as follows:

1. The architecture and landscaping is consistent with the General Plan, applicable Specific Plan, and adopted City Design Guidelines; and Phase 1 approval; and

2. The design and installation of the Preliminary Development Plan shall not be detrimental to the public health and safety, or be materially detrimental to the public welfare.

These findings are essentially the same, with the MPP Stage 1 Modification findings referring to the preliminary development plan, and the MPP Stage 2 findings referring to the architecture and landscaping, as well as consistency with the Stage 1 project. Therefore, for the purposes of this evaluation, both stages are examined together.

Site Plan and Building Siting: The project will modify the approved site plan by reorienting the industrial buildings on parcels 1, 4, and 5, and increasing the total square footage by approximately 50,000 square feet. Parcel 1 is situated at the southwest corner of Blue Oaks Boulevard and Fidelity Way, and Parcels 4 and 5 are located south of Parcel 1 and bounded by Industrial Avenue to the west and Freedom Way to the north.

As previously mentioned, on June 1, 2022, City staff approved a Voluntary Merger (File# PL22-0059) to merge Parcel 4 (017-123-083) and Parcel 5 (017-123-084) of the Blue Oaks Commerce Center Subdivision Parcel Map into one (1) parcel (resultant Parcel A). As of this writing, the Lot Merger has been recorded. Therefore, the project will encompass two (2) legal parcels.

NIPA PCL 56 – Blue Oaks Commerce Center, 2200 Freedom Way; File #PL22-0101 Planning Commission – September 22, 2022 – Page 6 of 20 Figure 6: Parcel 1 Proposed Site Plan Figure 7: Parcel A Proposed Site Plan
Parcel 1 is proposed with two (2) standalone industrial buildings measuring 85 feet in width and 700 feet in length, totaling 119,500 square feet of building area (see Figure 6). Building D is setback approximately NIPA PCL 56 – Blue Oaks Commerce Center, 2200 Freedom Way; File #PL22-0101 Planning Commission – September 22, 2022 – Page 7 of 20 120 feet from Blue Oaks Boulevard and has a front average setback of 105 feet. Similar to Parcel 1, Parcel A is proposed with two (2) standalone industrial buildings (see Figure 7). Building A is proposed to measure approximately 150 feet in depth and 730 feet in width. Building B is proposed to measure 110 feet in depth and 730 feet in width. The total square footage of Buildings A and B is approximately 189,300 square feet in size.

The NRADG requires minimum landscape setbacks for both Primary Arterial Corridors and Secondary Arterial Corridors. According to the NRADG, Blue Oaks Boulevard is designated as a Primary Landscape Corridor and Industrial Avenue as a Secondary Landscape Corridor, therefore, a 50 foot landscape corridor is proposed along Blue Oaks Boulevard and a 35 foot landscape corridor is proposed along Industrial Avenue. At the northeast corner of Parcel 1 the parking stalls encroach 2 feet within the landscape corridor. As a result of this encroachment the landscape corridor is decreased by two (2) feet, to allow for a minimum drive aisle width of 24 feet which will allow adequate emergency access and backup distance for vehicles exiting these spaces. This minor reduction in setback is supported by staff and is the only area of the project site where the landscape corridor is less than 50 feet.

Pursuant to the NRADG, a building pad landscape area of 10 feet is also required around the buildings.

Buildings A-D all propose this landscape zone around the buildings where permissible.

Vehicle Access and Circulation: The changes to the site plan will result in modifications to the access and circulation pattern of the parcels. The project will provide driveways along Industrial Avenue to the west, along Freedom Way to the south and north, and along Fidelity Way to the east, consistent with the original MPP approval. However, a vehicle access evaluation of the project site was prepared by Fehr & Peers (Attachment 2) and found that the second driveway along Industrial Avenue would permit full turning movements. The same study also found that the driveway north of Freedom Way and South of the Blue Oaks Bridge would only permit right-turns in and out of the site.

Therefore, the Engineering Division has added Condition #7, which will require the driveway along Industrial Avenue on Parcel 1 to restrict inbound and outbound movements to right-turns only by constructing a narrow raised curb on the east edge of the median within Industrial Ave. City Engineering and Fire Department staff have reviewed the project and found it to conform to City design standards and emergency vehicle response standards. The project has adequate vehicle site access, meets design standards, and will not be detrimental to public health and safety.

Parking: The Blue Oaks Commerce Center project was approved and designed so that adequate parking for all uses was provided on each parcel independent of other projects and will meet the City’s parking standards.,
Based on the Zoning Ordinance parking requirement for general industrial uses, the project is required a minimum of 400 parking spaces. Between the Parcels 1 and A, the project proposes 822 parking spaces, 4 bike parking, and 99 Clean Air/EV parking spaces, exceeding the parking requirement.

Architecture: The Blue Oaks Commerce Center MPP Stage 1 included the review and approval of the conceptual architecture and landscaping for the site. The purpose of the conceptual plans is to show a consistent architecture and landscape theme, in compliance with the applicable design guidelines, that provides a guide for development of the site. The Community Design Guidelines suggest that projects with multiple buildings develop an architectural theme throughout the project. The Blue Oaks Commerce Center MPP Stage 1 conceptual plans show a concrete tilt-up construction, score lines and wall, and roof line variation to provide visual interest, consistent with the Community Design Guidelines (see Figure 8).

NIPA PCL 56 – Blue Oaks Commerce Center, 2200 Freedom Way; File #PL22-0101 Planning Commission – September 22, 2022 – Page 8 of 20 Figure 8: Blue Oaks Commerce Center MPP Stage 1 Approved Building Elevations The Blue Oaks Commerce
Center Buildings A, B, C, & D
will be of similar design to the
approved MPP Stage 1 plans.

The project buildings are
designed as a concrete tilt-up
industrial buildings with
architecture features like
reveals, stepped facades and
parapets, metal cornices, steel
beam accents over the
windows and canopies at the
entries. The buildings are
rectangular in shape with
variation in height to break up
the structure and provide visual
interest. The heights of the
buildings vary between 35 feet
and 43 feet tall, consistent with
the NRADG. The project
incorporates a similar paint
palette found in other
warehouse buildings within the vicinity, the buildings are proposed a variation of grey and white colors (see Figure 9).

The buildings are designed with a main entrance door defined by the forward presentation and aluminum storefront windows. The back elevations of each building will consist of a metal roll-up door for the loading dock area. The proposed evergreen trees at the corners of each building will minimize the views of the loading docks from public view. As proposed, the design of the buildings is similar to the approved Blue Oaks Commerce Center MPP Stage 1, and is consistent with the NRADG and the CDG.

Figure 9: Proposed Color Palette
NIPA PCL 56 – Blue Oaks Commerce Center, 2200 Freedom Way; File #PL22-0101 Planning Commission – September 22, 2022 – Page 9 of 20 Landscaping: The Blue Oaks Commerce Center conceptual landscape plans included a master landscape palette to be applied throughout the project. The proposed planting plan includes street trees suggested in the NRADG, shade trees, accent trees, and drought tolerant plants. Trees include a mix of London Planes and Chinese Pistache along the roadways and within the parking area, and Red Maples, Birch, Deodar Cedar, Loquat, Hawthorne, and Crape Myrtles around the building. Curvilinear lawns, areas of mow-free fescue, and shrub plantings are to be used along roadway frontages. The water quality swales should also be planted with trees and suitable vegetation that will allow the water treatment system to function properly. Consistent with the NRADG, 10 feet of planting area will be provided around the base of all buildings. The final landscaping will be required to adhere to the Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance (WELO).

Landscaping within the parking area will consist of a mix of Cherokee crape myrtle and drake lacebark elm. The CDG requires that 50-percent of the paved parking areas be shaded by trees at 15-year maturity. The landscaping plan indicates that the project site will provide 54-percent parking lot shading, meeting the requirement. Lastly, along the north side of Freedom Way a Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) gas main exists that precludes any trees or shrubs to be located within five feet of the gas line. The proposed site plan shows the majority of the street trees would be located a minimum of five (5) feet from this line. To ensure this requirement, Condition #10 has been added to the project. Overall, the landscape design is consistent with the landscaping palate used throughout the NRADG and is consistent with the CDG.

Lighting: The parking lot lighting will consist of LED pole-mounted lights with an overall height of twentyfive (25) feet. This height complies with CDG Policy OI-82, which requires pole mounted lighting to be no taller than 35 feet for industrial projects. Consistent with CDG Policy OI-78, the lighting sources will have cut off lenses and be located to avoid light spillage and glare on adjacent properties and in private spaces.

The lighting is conditioned to comply with the City’s minimum lighting level requirements (0.5 foot-candles in pedestrian areas and 1.0 foot-candles in vehicle areas). As such, staff finds the photometric plan is consistent with the CDG.

CONCLUSION
The proposed project is consistent with the City’s General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, North Roseville Area Design Guidelines, CDG, and the prior Blue Oaks Commerce Center project approvals. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the MPP Stage 1 Modification and MPP Stage 2.

PUBLIC OUTREACH
The proposed project was distributed to all internal and external agencies and departments who have requested such notice, and all comments or recommended conditions of approval have been incorporated into the project, as appropriate. Early notification of the project was posted on the Roseville Coalition of Neighborhood Associations (RCONA)’s website. A notice of the public hearing was published in the Roseville Press Tribune on September 10, 2022 and a notice of the hearing was also distributed to all property owners within 300 feet of the site and posted on the RCONA website. No comments have been received as of publication of the staff report.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
An Addendum to the Blue Oaks Commerce Center Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (Adopted on May 27, 2010) was prepared for the Blue Oaks Commerce Center project (File #PL22-0101) consistent with CEQA Section 15164. This Addendum evaluated the impact of development of the Blue Oaks Commerce Center, which includes the project site. The proposed project is substantially consistent with the previously evaluated project, and no new effects are expected to occur.

NIPA PCL 56 – Blue Oaks Commerce Center, 2200 Freedom Way; File #PL22-0101 Planning Commission – September 22, 2022 – Page 10 of 20 RECOMMENDATION The Planning Division recommends the Planning Commission take the following actions:

1. Consider the Addendum to the Blue Oaks Commerce Center Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration; and

2. Adopt the two (2) findings of fact and approve the MAJOR PROJECT PERMIT STAGE 1 MODIFICATION – 2200 FREEDOM WAY – NIPA PCL 56 – BLUE OAKS COMMERCE CENTER (BLDS. A, B, C, & D) – FILE #PL22-0101 subject to ten (10) conditions of approval; and

3. Adopt the two (2) findings of fact and approve the MAJOR PROJECT PERMIT STAGE 2 – 2200 FREEDOM WAY – NIPA PCL 56 – BLUE OAKS COMMERCE CENTER (BLDS. A, B, C, & D) – FILE #PL22-0101 subject to ninety-three (93) conditions of approval.

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE MPP STAGE 1 MODIFICATION – FILE #PL22-0101

1. This Major Project Permit (MPP) Stage 1 modification approval shall be effectuated within a period of two (2) years from September 22, 2022 and if not effectuated shall expire on September 22, 2024.

Prior to said expiration date, the applicant may apply for an extension of time, provided this approval does not extend the expiration beyond September 22, 2025. (Planning)

2. The project is approved as shown in Exhibit A – B and as conditioned or modified below. (Planning)

3. The project is subject to the previously approved conditions of approval for the NIPA Blue Oaks Commerce Center MPP Stage 1 – File 2007PL-039 (MPP-000013 & SUB-000143), except as conditioned or modified below. (Planning)

4. The project shall comply with all required environmental mitigation identified in the Blue Oaks Commerce Center Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (File# 2007PL-039) and subsequent Addendum prepared for the project, and shall include all applicable mitigation measures as notes on the grading plans. (All Departments)

5. Bike parking and clean air vehicle spaces shall be provided per the California Green Building Standards. Bike rack/locker design and location shall be approved by Alternative Transportation. (Alternative Transportation, Building).

6. The applicant shall provide a bus shelter easement at the location of the bus shelter pad along northbound Industrial Avenue, north of Freedom Way, adjacent to the site. (Engineering, Alternative Transportation)

7. The applicant shall install a raised curb at the northern driveway along Industrial Avenue, per the recommendations identified in the Technical Memorandum (Focused Access Evaluation for the Blue Oaks Commerce Center) prepared by Fehr & Peers dated July 26th, 2022. The raised curb shall begin 100 feet north of the driveway centerline and end 75 feet to the south of the driveway centerline. A One Way Only sign shall be placed within the raised curb visible to vehicles exiting the driveway. A NO U-Turn sign shall be installed at the north end of the raised curb or in the adjacent median. This will limit this driveway to right in/out only. (Engineering)

8. The applicant shall stripe a 175 foot southbound left-turn lane within the paved median to serve the southern driveway located along Industrial Avenue. All turning movements are approved on this driveway. (Engineering)

9. The address for this project shall be 2200 Freedom Wy. The address for proposed Building A shall be 2251 Freedom Wy. The address for proposed Building B shall be 2151 Freedom Wy. The address for proposed Building C shall be 2150 Freedom Wy. The address for proposed Building D shall be NIPA PCL 56 – Blue Oaks Commerce Center, 2200 Freedom Way; File #PL22-0101 Planning Commission – September 22, 2022 – Page 11 of 20 2250 Freedom Wy. All projects with multi-tenants or buildings must submit a site plan with building footprint(s) and suite numbers to the Development Services Department (Business Services – Addressing) for review and approval. (Business Services).

10. All trees and shrub plantings along Freedom Way shall be at least 5-feet away from the existing Pacific Gas & Electric gas line. (Planning)
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE MPP STAGE 2 – FILE #PL22-0101

1. This Major Project Permit approval shall be effectuated within a period of two (2) years from September 22, 2022 and if not effectuated shall expire on September 22, 2024. Prior to said expiration date, the applicant may apply for an extension of time, provided this approval does not extend the expiration beyond September 22, 2025. (Planning)

2. The project is approved as shown in Exhibits A – B and as conditioned or modified below. (Planning)

3. Lighting shall be reviewed with Stage Two and shall comply with Community Design Guidelines lighting standards (1 footcandle for roadways and parking lots and 0.5 footcandles for walkways). (Planning)

4. Tree plantings on the project site shall cumulatively provide a minimum of 50% shade coverage for parking areas and drive aisles, consistent with the Community Design Guidelines. (Planning)

5. Fencing and retaining walls shall be reviewed with the MPP Stage 2 application and shall be consistent with the Zoning Ordinance, Community Design Guidelines and North Roseville Design Guidelines, and improvement standards. (Planning)

6. The applicant shall pay City’s actual costs for providing plan check, mapping, GIS, and inspection services. This may be a combination of staff costs and direct billing for contract professional services. (Engineering, Environmental Utilities, Finance)

7. The design and construction of all improvements shall conform to the Improvement Standards and Construction Standards of the City of Roseville, or as modified by these conditions of approval, or as directed by the City Engineer. (Engineering)

8. The applicant shall not commence with any on-site improvements until such time as grading and/or improvement plans are approved and grading and/or encroachment permits are issued by the Development Services - Engineering. (Engineering)

9. The approval of this project does not constitute approval of proposed improvements as to size, design, materials, or location, unless specifically addressed in these conditions of approval. (Engineering) PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS:

10. All buildings shall be occupied with uses permitted in the General Industrial (M2) zone district, per the Roseville Municipal Code. Conditionally permitted uses may be permitted upon approval of a Conditional Use Permit prior to building occupancy. Uses not permitted under the current zoning shall only be permitted upon approval of a Rezone. All future development must comply with the Roseville Zoning Ordinance. (Planning)

11. Parking lot design shall conform to the City’s design standards, including the following minimum standards for parking stalls:
a. All parking stalls shall be double-striped. Parking stalls adjacent to sidewalks, landscaped areas or light fixtures, and all Accessible stalls shall abut a 6-inch raised curb or concrete bumper. (Planning)
NIPA PCL 56 – Blue Oaks Commerce Center, 2200 Freedom Way; File #PL22-0101 Planning Commission – September 22, 2022 – Page 12 of 20 b. Standard – 9 feet x 18 feet; Compact – 9 feet x 16 feet; Accessible – 14 feet x 18 feet (a 9-foot-wide parking area plus a 5-foot-wide loading area) and a minimum of one (1) parking space shall be Accessible van accessible – 17 feet x 18 feet (9-foot-wide parking area plus an 8-foot-wide loading area). (Planning)
c. An 'exterior routes of travel' site accessibility plan incorporating slope, cross-slope, width, pedestrian ramps, curb ramps, handrails, signage, detectable warnings or speed limit signs or equivalent means shall comprise part of the site improvement plans submitted to City for review, prior to building plan check approvals. This site accessibility plan shall also include:
i. Accessible parking stalls shall be dispersed and located closest to accessible entrances. The total number of accessible parking spaces shall be established by Table 11B-208.2 of the CBC.
ii. Accessible Parking spaces and crosswalks shall be signed, marked and maintained as required by Chapter 11 of the CBC.
iii. Accessible parking and exterior route of travel shall comply with CBC, Sections 11B-206 and 11B-208. (Building)

12. Signs and/or striping shall be provided on-site as required by the Planning Department to control onsite traffic movements. (Planning)

13. The plans submitted to the Building Department for permits shall indicate all approved revisions/alterations as approved by the Commission including all conditions of approval. (Planning)

14. The project Landscape Plans shall comply with the following:
a. The Landscape Plan shall indicate the location of, and be designed to avoid conflicts with, all pole-mounted light fixtures and utility equipment including (but not limited to) electric transformers, switchgear, and overhead lines; backflow preventers; fire department connections; and public water, sewer, and storm drain facilities. (Planning, Fire, Environmental Utilities, Electric, Public Works)
b. The tree plantings in the parking lot shall be designed to provide a minimum of 50% shade coverage after 15 years. (Planning)
c. At a minimum, landscaped areas not covered with live material shall be covered with a rock, (3") bark (no shredded bark) or (3") mulch covering. (Planning) d. The landscape plan shall comply with the Landscape Guidelines for North Roseville Area Design Guidelines and the City of Roseville Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. (Planning, Environmental Utilities)
e. Landscaping adjacent to preserve areas shall consist of California native, drought-tolerant groundcover, shrubs, plants, and trees. (Open Space, Planning) f. All landscaping in areas containing electrical service equipment shall conform to the Electric Department's Landscape Requirements and Work Clearances as outlined in Section 10.00 of the Departments "Specification for Commercial Construction." (Electric) g. Slopes within landscape planters shall be no more than 3:1. A two-foot flat bench located at back-of-walk shall be included in the landscape area to slow or allow absorption of nuisance run-off from the planters. (Parks, Recreation, and Libraries) NIPA PCL 56 – Blue Oaks Commerce Center, 2200 Freedom Way; File #PL22-0101 Planning Commission – September 22, 2022 – Page 13 of 20 h. All landscaping shall conform to the standards of crime prevention through environmental design with the intent to create natural surveillance, controlling access, and territorial reinforcement to property boundaries. (Police)At a minimum, landscaped areas not covered with live material shall be covered with a rock, (2") bark (no shredded bark) or (2") mulch covering. (Planning)

15. Any roof-mounted equipment and satellite dishes proposed shall be shown on the building plans. The equipment shall be fully screened from public streets and the surrounding properties. (Planning)

16. At the time of building permit application and plan submittal, the project applicant shall submit a proposed plan which shows the proposed addressing for the building and dwelling unit numbers.

The Building Official, or the designee, shall approve said plan prior to building permit approval. Refer to the City of Roseville Addressing Guidelines. (Building)

17. At the time of building permit application and plan submittal, the project applicant shall submit a proposed plan which shows the proposed suite addressing for individual tenant spaces within the building. The Building Official, or the designee, shall approve said plan prior to building permit approval. Refer to the City of Roseville Addressing Guidelines. (Building)

18. A separate Architectural Site Accessibility Plan which details the project's site accessibility information as required by California Title 24, Part 2 shall be submitted as part of the project Building Permit Plans. (Building)

19. For Multiple Building Complexes: As part of the required Architectural Site Accessibility Plan, the developer shall delineate the extent of the site accessibility improvements being installed as part of the initial improvements for the project, and those that are planned to be developed as part of subsequent phases (i.e. around future pad buildings). (Building)

20. Building permit plans shall comply with all applicable code requirements (California Building Code – CBC – based on the International Building Code, California Green Building Standards Code– CGBSC, California Mechanical Code – CMC – based on the Uniform Mechanical Code, California Plumbing Code – CPC – based on the Uniform Plumbing Code, California Fire Code – CFC – based on the International Fire Code – with City of Roseville Amendments – RFC, California Electrical Code – CEC – based on the National Electrical Code, and California Energy Standards – CEC T-24 Part 6), California Title 24 and the American with Disabilities Act - ADA requirements, and all State and Federally mandated requirements in effect at the time of submittal for building permits (contact the Building Division for applicable Code editions). (Building)

21. For restaurants, other food services, or commercial swimming pools: The developer shall obtain all required approvals and permits from the Placer County Health Department. (Building)

22. For restaurants, other food services, or commercial swimming pools: The developer shall obtain all required approvals and permits from the Placer County Health Department and the City of Roseville Industrial Waste Division. (Building, Environmental Utilities)

23. Maintenance of copy of building plans: Health and Safety Code section 19850 requires the building department of every city or county to maintain an official copy of the building plans for the life of the building. As such, each individual building shall be submitted as a separate submittal package.

Building plan review, permit issuance and archiving is based on each individual building address. (Building)

24. For all work to be performed off-site, permission to enter and construct shall be obtained from the property owner, in the form of a notarized right-of-entry. Said notarized right-of-entry shall be provided to Public Works prior to approval of any plans. (Public Works) NIPA PCL 56 – Blue Oaks Commerce Center, 2200 Freedom Way; File #PL22-0101 Planning Commission – September 22, 2022 – Page 14 of 20 25. Improvements on Industrial Avenue shall be constructed to obtain 12-foot north bound and south bound travel lanes, a 10-foot north bound auxiliary lane across the entire frontage, a 12 –foot twoway left turn lane, and a 4-foot north bound bike lane. The property frontage on Industrial Avenue shall be improved to include standard curb, gutter, and an 8-foot detached pedestrian path. The site shall be accessed, with full turn movements, through Road A and the A-7 driveways located north and south of Road A. Driveways shall be 35-feet in width and shall have 30-foot curb returns for truck access. (Engineering)

26. The Improvement Plans shall include a complete set of Landscape Plans. The Landscape Plans shall be approved with the Improvement Plans. (Planning, Public Works, Fire, Environmental Utilities, Electric)

27. A note shall be added to the grading plans that states:
“Prior to the commencement of grading operations, the contractor shall identify the site where the excess/borrow earthen material shall be imported/deposited. If the borrow/deposit site is within the City of Roseville, the contractor shall produce a report issued by a geotechnical engineer to verify that the exported materials are suitable for the intended fill, and shall show proof of all approved grading plans. Haul routes to be used shall be specified.” (Public Works)

28. The developer shall place bus shelters and pads on northbound Industrial Avenue north of Road A (Shelter #10-249), southbound Washington Boulevard south of Road A (Shelter #10-250), westbound Road A west of Washington Boulevard (Shelter #10-251), eastbound Road “A” before the entrance to Parcel 7 (Shelter #10-252), and southbound on Road B south of Blue Oaks Boulevard (Shelter #10- 253). (Engineering/Transportation)

29. Developer shall be responsible for the installation of a bus shelter and related improvements conforming to the city's current standards on the shelter pads as conditioned above. The Developer and City may enter into a deferred improvement or other agreement based upon a construction cost of $10,000 per shelter. (Engineering, Transit)

30. All driveways located on Road A and Road B shall be designed and constructed as 35-foot wide Type A-7 driveways. (Engineering)

31. The applicant shall dedicate all necessary rights-of-way or Public Utility Easement for the widening of any streets or transfer of public utilities across and over any portion of the property as required with this entitlement. A separate document shall be drafted for approval and acceptance by the City of Roseville, and recorded at the County Recorder’s Office. (Public Works)

32. Bike parking and clean air vehicle spaces shall be provided per the California Green Building Standards. Bike rack/locker design and location shall be approved by Alternative Transportation. (Alternative Transportation, Building).

33. The grading plans shall be accompanied with engineered structural calculations for all retaining walls greater then 4 feet in height. All retaining walls shall be of either split faced masonry units, keystone type construction, or cast in place concrete with fascia treatment. (Engineering)

34. All storm drainage, including roof drains, shall be collected on site and treated with Best Management Practices (BMP’s) per the City’s Stormwater Quality Design Manual. All storm water shall be routed to the nearest existing storm drain system or natural drainage facility. Drain outfalls shall extend down to the receiving water and shall be constructed with adequate velocity attenuation devices. The grading/improvement plans for the site shall be accompanied with a shed map that defines that area tributary to this site and all drainage facilities shall be designed to accommodate the tributary flow. The storm drain system and proposed BMP’s shall be privately owned and maintained by the property NIPA PCL 56 – Blue Oaks Commerce Center, 2200 Freedom Way; File #PL22-0101 Planning Commission – September 22, 2022 – Page 15 of 20 owner. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the owner shall provide a plan for the maintenance of the proposed BMP’s. (Public Works)

35. Prior to the approval of the Improvement Plans, the project proponent shall provide proof of preparation and submittal of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). Proof shall be in the form of the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID#), provided to the applicant from RWQCB, placed on the coversheet of the improvement plans. Upon approval of the improvement plans, a copy of the SWPPP shall be required onsite and available for viewing by City inspection staff upon request. (Engineering)

36. The developer shall be responsible for any necessary relocation of signal interconnect cables that may require re-location as a result of the construction of turn lanes and/or driveways. (Public Works)

37. Sight distances for all driveways shall be clearly shown on the improvement plans to verify that minimum standards are achieved. It will be the responsibility of the project proponent to provide appropriate landscaping and improvement plans, and to relocate and/or modify existing facilities as needed to meet these design objectives. (Public Works)

38. Roseville Electric will be requiring a 25’ Public Utilities Easement (PUE) that runs contiguously along the east side of Road “B” and the north side of Road “A”, and a 12’-6” PUE that runs contiguously along the west side of Road “B” and the south side of Road “A”. (Electric, Engineering)

39. Roseville Electric will be requiring the proposed 50’ landscape easement along Blue Oaks Blvd. be changed to a 50’ Landscape/ Public Utility Easement. (Electric, Engineering)

40. Roseville Electric will be requiring the proposed 50’ landscape easement along Washington Blvd. be changed to a 50’ Landscape/ Public Utility Easement. (Electric, Engineering)

41. Roseville Electric will be requiring the proposed 35’ landscape easement along Industrial Ave. to be changed to a 35’ Landscape/ Public Utility Easement. (Electric, Engineering)

42. Roseville Electric will be requiring a 35’ Public Utility Easement centered on all existing overhead electric lines throughout the entire site. (Electric, Engineering)

43. All street lighting along road A and B shall be installed, at the developer’s expense, per the approved City of Roseville Electric Site Utility Design generated by Roseville Electric. (Electric)

44. Roseville Electric shall require additional easements to cover all high voltage electric equipment. This can be accomplished by a common area Public Utilites Easements over the each parcel or by an easement by separate document over all high voltage equipment, as shown on the approved Electric Site Utility Design, generated by Roseville Electric. (Electric, Engineering)

45. The applicant shall remove and reconstruct any existing damaged curb, gutter, and sidewalk along the property frontage. During plan check of the improvement plans and/or during inspection, Public Works will designate the exact areas to be reconstructed. Any existing public facilities damaged during the course of construction shall be repaired by the property owner and at the property owner’s expense, to the satisfaction of the City. (Public Works)

46. Prior to the approval of the improvement plans, it will be the project proponent’s responsibility to pay the standard City Trench Cut Recovery Fee for any cuts within the City streets that are required for the installation of underground utilities. (Public Works)

47. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the property owner shall pay into the following fee programs:

Citywide Drainage Fee, Citywide Traffic Mitigation Fee (TMF), Highway 65 Joint Partners Association (JPA), South Placer Regional Transportation Authority (SPRTA), and City/County Fee. (Public Works) NIPA PCL 56 – Blue Oaks Commerce Center, 2200 Freedom Way; File #PL22-0101 Planning Commission – September 22, 2022 – Page 16 of 20 48. The applicant shall pay all applicable water and sewer fees. (Environmental Utilities)

49. Water and sewer infrastructure shall be designed pursuant to the adopted City of Roseville Improvement Standards and the City of Roseville Construction Standards and shall include:
a. Utilities or permanent structures shall not be located within the area which would be disturbed by an open trench needed to expose sewer trunk mains deeper than 12’ unless approved by Environmental Utilities in these conditions. The area needed to construct the trench is a sloped cone above the sewer main. The cone shall have 1:1 side slopes. b. Water and sewer mains shall not exceed a depth of 12’ below finished grade, unless authorized in these conditions of approval.
c. All sewer manholes shall have all weather 10-ton vehicle access unless authorized by these conditions of approval. (Environmental Utilities)

50. No trees are to be planted within 10’ of the 30” water main along the southern boundary of the property except with the approval of the Environmental Utilities Director. (Environmental Utilities)

51. The design and installation of all fire protection equipment shall conform to the California Fire Code and the amendments adopted by the City of Roseville, along with all standards and policies implemented by the Roseville Fire Department. (Fire)

52. The applicable codes and standards adopted by the City shall be enforced at the time construction plans have been submitted to the City for permitting. (Fire)

53. Based on the adopted fire protection codes adopted by this department, it appears that several of the buildings shall have installed a full fire alarm system subject to approval by this department. (Fire)

54. Trash enclosures, recycling areas, and enclosure approaches shall be designed to current Refuse Division specifications, the materials and colors shall match the building, and the location of such facilities shall be reviewed and approved by the Refuse Division, Planning and the Fire Department.

The enclosure must have inside dimensions of 12 feet wide and 9 feet deep and be built to the specifications of the Solid Waste Department’s Enclosure Description. (Refuse, Planning, Fire)

55. Access to trash enclosures shall have an inside turning radius of 25 feet and an outside turning radius of 45 feet must be maintained to allow the refuse truck access to and from the enclosure. Enclosures must have a clear approach of 65 feet in front of the enclosure to allow servicing bins. (Refuse)

56. A trash enclosure and recycling enclosure is required for each building and each tenant, otherwise, the building owner is responsible for the trash service. (Refuse)

57. A covered seating or reception area at the main entrance at buildings N and M visible from the driveways, shall be provided for dial-a-ride passengers, and the drop-off/pick-up shall be signed. (Planning, Transportation)

58. The applicant/developer shall prepare a Transportation Systems Management (TSM) Plan for Blue Oaks Commerce Center to be reviewed and approved by the Transportation Commission. (Transportation)

59. All on-site external lighting shall be installed and directed to have no off-site glare. Lighting within the parking areas shall provide a maintained minimum of one (1) foot candle of light. All exterior light fixtures shall be vandal resistant. (Planning & Police)
NIPA PCL 56 – Blue Oaks Commerce Center, 2200 Freedom Way; File #PL22-0101 Planning Commission – September 22, 2022 – Page 17 of 20 60. The parking lot shall have properly posted signs that state the use of the parking area is for the exclusive use of employees and customers of this project. (See California Vehicle Code Sections 22507.8, 22511.5, 22511.8, 22658(a), and the City of Roseville Municipal Code Section 11.20.110). The location of the signs shall be shown on the approved site plan. (Planning & Police)

61. It is the developer's responsibility to notify PG&E of any work required on PG&E facilities. (PG&E)

62. Recycled water infrastructure shall be designed pursuant to the adopted City of Roseville Improvement Standards and the City of Roseville Construction Standards. The applicant shall pay all applicable recycled water fees. Easements shall be provided as necessary for recycled water infrastructure. (Environmental Utilities)

63. The Electric Department requires the submittal of the following information in order to complete the final electric design for the project:
a. one (1) set of improvement plans
b. load calculations
c. electrical panel one-line drawings
DURING CONSTRUCTION & PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS:

64. Any backflow preventers visible from the street shall be painted green to blend in with the surrounding landscaping. The backflow preventers shall be screened with landscaping and shall comply with the following criteria:
a. There shall be a minimum clearance of four feet (4'), on all sides, from the backflow preventer to the landscaping.
b. For maintenance purposes, the landscaping shall only be installed on three sides and the plant material shall not have thorns.
c. The control valves and the water meter shall be physically unobstructed. d. The backflow preventer shall be covered with a green cover that will provide insulation. (Planning, Environmental Utilities)

65. The following easements shall be provided by separate instrument and shown on the site plan, unless otherwise provided for in these conditions:
a. Water and sewer easements. (Electric, Public Works, Environmental Utilities)

66. Easement widths shall comply with the City's Improvement Standards and Construction Standards.

Separate document easements required by the City shall be prepared in accordance with the City's "Policy for Dedication of Easements to the City of Roseville". All legal descriptions shall be prepared by a licensed land Surveyor. All existing public utility, electric, water, sewer and reclaimed water easements shall be maintained unless otherwise authorized by these conditions of approval. (Public Works, Environmental Utilities, Electric)

67. Inspection of the potable water supply system on new commercial/industrial/office projects shall be as follows:
a. The Environmental Utilities Inspector will inspect all potable water supply up to the downstream side of the backflow preventer.

NIPA PCL 56 – Blue Oaks Commerce Center, 2200 Freedom Way; File #PL22-0101 Planning Commission – September 22, 2022 – Page 18 of 20 b. The property owner/applicant shall be responsible for that portion of the water supply system from the backflow preventer to the building. The builder/contractor shall engage a qualified inspector to approve the installation of this portion of the water supply. The Building Division will require from the builder/contractor, a written document certifying that this portion of the potable water supply has been installed per improvement plans and in accordance with the Uniform Plumbing Code. This certificate of compliance shall be submitted to the Building Division before a temporary occupancy or a building final is approved.
c. The building inspectors will exclusively inspect all potable water supply systems for the building from the shutoff valve at the building and downstream within the building. (Building, Environmental Utilities)

68. All improvements being constructed in accordance with the approved grading and improvement plans shall be accepted as complete by the City. (Public Works)

69. The words "traffic control appurtenances" shall be included in the list of utilities allowed in public utilities easements (PUE's) located along public roadways. (Public Works)

70. Water, sewer and reclaimed water shall be constructed pursuant to the adopted City of Roseville Improvement Standards and the City of Roseville Construction Standards. (Environmental Utilities)

71. All water backflow devices shall be tested and approved by the Environmental Utilities Department. (Environmental Utilities)

72. Restaurants or other Food Service Establishment (FSE). The applicant shall design for installation and/or install an exterior grease interceptor if the proposed business could potentially discharge substances containing fats, oils and grease (FOG) into the sewer system. The grease interceptor shall be adequate to separate and remove FOG contained in the wastewater from FSE’s prior to discharge to the public sewer. (Environmental Utilities)

73. In the event an exterior grease interceptor cannot be installed due to space limitation, the developer shall install a grease trap, per City Standards, that will mechanically separate the FOG contained in the wastewater from the FSE prior to discharge to the public sewer. (Environmental Utilities)

74. Pursuant to the Municipal Code, the applicant shall apply for and obtain a FOG waste discharge permit (FOG WDP) from the Environmental Utilities Industrial Waste Division prior to occupancy or prior to discharging waste to the public sewer. The applicant shall submit information required by the Environmental Utilities Department for evaluation, including but not limited to: site plans, floor plans, mechanical and plumbing plans, and details to show all sewers, FOG control device, grease interceptor or other pretreatment equipment and appurtenances by size, location and elevation.

Additional information related to the applicant’s business operations and potential discharge may be requested to properly evaluate the FOG WDP application. (Environmental Utilities)

75. All Electric Department facilities, including streetlights where applicable, shall be designed and built to the "City of Roseville Specifications for Commercial Construction." (Electric)

76. The City of Roseville Electric Department has electrical construction charges which are to be paid by the developer and which are explained in the City of Roseville "Specification for Commercial Construction." These charges will be determined upon completion of the final electrical design. (Electric)

77. Any relocation, rearrangement, or change of existing electric facilities due to this development shall be at the developer's expense. (Electric)
NIPA PCL 56 – Blue Oaks Commerce Center, 2200 Freedom Way; File #PL22-0101 Planning Commission – September 22, 2022 – Page 19 of 20 78. Any facilities proposed for placement within public/electric utility easements shall be subject to review and approval by the Electric Department before any work commences in these areas. This includes, but is not limited to, landscaping, lighting, paving, signs, trees, walls, and structures of any type. (Electric)

79. All electric metering shall be directly outside accessible. This can be accomplished in any of the following ways:
a. Locate the metered service panel on the outside of the building. b. Locate the metered service panel in a service room with a door that opens directly to the outside. The developer will be required to provide a key to the door for placement in a lock box to be installed on the outside of the door. Any doors leading from the service room to other areas of the building shall be secured to prohibit unauthorized entry. (Electric)

80. One ¾-inch conduit with a 2-pair phone line shall be installed from the building’s telephone service panel to the meter section of the customer's electrical switchgear or panel. (Electric)

81. It is the responsibility of the developer to ensure that all existing electric facilities remain free and clear of any obstruction during construction and when the project is complete. (Electric) OTHER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:

82. Signs shown on the elevations are not approved as part of the Major Project Permit Stage 2. A Sign Permit is required for all project signs. (Planning)

83. Following the installation of the landscaping, all landscape material shall be maintained in a healthy and weed-free condition; dead plant material shall be replaced immediately. All trees shall be maintained and pruned in accordance with the accepted practices of the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA). (Planning)

84. The City reserves the right to restrict vehicle turning movements within the public right-of-way in the future if deemed necessary by the City Engineer. (Public Works)

85. The required width of fire apparatus access roads shall not be obstructed in any manner, including the parking of vehicles. Minimum required widths and vertical clearances established by the Fire Code shall be maintained at all times during construction. Closure of accesses for fire apparatus by gates, barricades and other devices shall be prohibited unless approved by the Fire Chief. (Fire)

86. Temporary aboveground storage tanks may be used at construction sites for diesel fuel only and shall not exceed 1,000 gallon capacity. Tanks shall comply with all provisions found within the Fire Code. A Fire Department Permit shall be obtained prior to tank installation. The permit shall expire after 90 days from the date of issuance, unless extended by the Fire Chief. (Fire)

87. If site survey or earth moving work results in the discovery of hazardous materials in containers or what appears to be hazardous wastes released into the ground, the contractor or person responsible for the building permit must notify the Roseville Fire Department immediately. A representative from the Fire Department will make a determination as to whether the incident is reportable of not and if site remediation is required. (Fire)

88. The location and design of the gas service shall be determined by PG&E. The design of the gas service for this project shall not begin until PG&E has received a full set of City approved improvement plans for the project. (PG&E)
NIPA PCL 56 – Blue Oaks Commerce Center, 2200 Freedom Way; File #PL22-0101 Planning Commission – September 22, 2022 – Page 20 of 20

89. All commercial air conditioning units 5 tons or less (<65,000 btu/ h) shall meet the current Consortium for Energy Efficiency ("CEE") Tier I specifications. The SEER/EER ratings will be specified on building plans and Title 24 compliance certificates at the time building permits are requested. The SEER and EER ratings will be verified with appropriate documentation. These requirements shall be utilized in the overall energy compliance calculations required for issuance of any building permit for any commercial building in the Plan Area. Any variances, with the exception of Tier 2 compliance, must be approved by the Electric Department's Retail Energy Services Department. (Electric)

90. The project is subject to the noise standards established in the City's Noise Ordinance. In accordance with the City's Noise Ordinance, project construction is exempt between the hours of seven a.m. and seven p.m. Monday through Friday, and between the hours of eight a.m. and eight p.m. Saturday and Sunday, provided that all construction equipment shall be fitted with factory installed muffling devices and be maintained in good working order. (Building)

91. The developer (or designated consultant) shall certify that the building foundation location has been placed according to all approved setback requirements shown on the approved site plan. The developer shall prepare a written statement confirming building placement and provide an original copy to the City Building Division Field Inspector at the time of or prior to the foundation inspection. (Building)

92. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant may apply for a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy (TCO) of the building. If a TCO is desired, the applicant must submit a written request to the Building Division a minimum of thirty (30) days prior to the expected temporary occupancy date and shall include a schedule for occupancy and a description of the purpose for the Temporary Certificate of Occupancy. (Building)

93. Concurrent with submittal for plan check and prior to a request for final building inspection, the applicant may request City approval of an occupancy phasing plan to allow individual or multiple building occupancies. This request shall be made in writing to the Building Division and shall include 10 copies of the following:
a. A description of measures that will be undertaken to minimize conflict between residents/building occupants and construction traffic (e.g. fencing, etc.); b. A phasing plan showing the proposed buildings, internal roads and access routes, landscaping, trash enclosure locations, and any other improvements planned for each phase; and
c. An estimated time frame for each phase and a specific date for the first phase. (Planning, Building)

ATTACHMENTS

1. Addendum to the Blue Oaks Commerce Center Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration

2. Fehr & Peers Focused Access Evaluation for Blue Oaks Commerce Center

EXHIBIT
A. Plans
B. Color Board
Note to Applicant and/or Developer: Please contact Planning Division staff at (916) 774-5276 prior to the Commission meeting if you have any questions on any of the recommended conditions for your project. If you challenge the decision of the Commission in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues which you or someone else raised at the public hearing held for this project, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Manager at, or prior to, the public hearing.

NOTE: The exhibits and attachments to the PC Staff
report are not included as part of this attachment,
because they are included as exhibits and attachments
to the Council Communication.

APPEAL FORM
Name: ___________________________________________ Date: _____________________ Address: ___________________________ City: _________________ Zip Code: ________ Phone Numbers: (work/day) _________________ (home/evening) ___________________ (cell ) _____________________ (email) __________________________________________ Please describe below the action for which this appeal is being filed. (You may attach a separate letter if enough space is not provided.)
Signed: ___________________________________________ Date: ____9/30/2022_____

PLANNING DIVISION
311 Vernon Street, Roseville, CA 95678 (916) 774-5276
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY. (Date Stamp Below)
Received by: ____________________________________
Project Being Appealed: ________________________________________________ File Number: __________________
Approving Body: _____________________________ Approval Date: _____________ This appeal is being filed by Lozeau Drury LLP on behalf of Laborers International Union of North America, Local Union 185, to appeal the Planning Commission's September 22, 2022 decision to approve a Major Project Permit (MPP) Stage 1 Modification and MPP Stage 2 to allow construction and operation of four industrial buildings totaling approximately 310,000 square feet in size and an Addendum to the Blue Oaks Commerce Center Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for NIPA PCL 56 - Blue Oaks Commerce Center, 2200 Freedom Wy, File # PL22-010. The specific grounds for this appeal are (1) mitigation measures which are considerably different from those analyzed in the 2010 MND would substantially reduce one or more significant cumulative air quality impacts. As the 2004 West Roseville Specific Plan determined, the Project will contribute to significant cumulative air quality impacts. In the last several years, numerous mitigation measures for distribution centers and warehouses have been identified to address air quality impacts which have not been adopted for the Project. A subsequent MND must be prepared to address those more recent mitigation measures. (2) The proposed increase in size of the Project by 17%, and the resulting increase in truck and other air pollution emissions and energy usage, is a substantial change to the Project which requires major revisions of the prior MND. As a result, a subsequent MND for the Project must be prepared.

Laborers International Union of North America, Local Union 185 September 30, 2022 1939 Harrison St. Ste 150 Oakland 94612
510-836-4200
510-607-8234 [email protected] and [email protected] CC ATTACHMENT 2
425 Market Street
Suite 2900
San Francisco, CA 94105
415.227.0900 Phone
415.227.0770 Fax
BN 73239887v1
415.227.3508 Direct October 20, 2022 [email protected] Joseph Speaker
Assistant City Attorney
City of Roseville
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, California 95678
Re: File Number PL 22-010; Blue Oaks Commerce Center
Dear Joe:

I am writing on behalf of my client, Schnitzer Properties, project applicant (“Applicant”) for Blue Oaks Commerce Center, File Number 22-0101. Blue Oaks Commerce Center consists of the development of four industrial buildings totaling approximately 310,000 square feet (“Project”), located on two parcels totaling 23.94 acres at 2200, 2301, and 2201 Freedom Way (“Property” or “Project Site”) in the City of Roseville (“City”). On September 22, 2022, the Roseville Planning Commission adopted an addendum (“Addendum”) to a previously adopted Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (“IS/MND”) and approved a Major Project Permit Stage 1 Modification and Major Project Permit Stage 2 Modification for the Project.

Lozeau Drury, LLP, on behalf of Laborers International Union of North America, Local Union 185 (“LIUNA” or “Appellant”), filed an appeal challenging the Planning Commission’s approval of the Project (“Appeal”). LIUNA never submitted any comments on the IS/MND in 2011, nor did it submit any comments before or at the Planning Commission meeting on the Project. LIUNA first questioned the City’s adoption of the Addendum and the approval of the Project for the first time in its generic Appeal contending that there were different unspecified mitigation measures compared to those identified in the IS/MND that would reduce significant cumulative air quality impacts. LIUNA also suggested the Project’s increased size required major revisions to the IS/MND under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) without any evidence.

The purpose of this letter is to address LIUNA’s unsubstantiated assertions, and explain that contrary to LIUNA’s assertions, substantial evidence supports the City’s reliance on the CC ATTACHMENT 3
Joseph Speaker
October 20, 2022