Roseville City Council
December 18, 2024

Attachment F

SEALED PROPOSAL LABEL

PROPOSAL

PREPARED FOR CITY OF ROSEVILLE
Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant
Electrical Power System
Capacity Expansion
Project Design Services
July 2024
carollo.com
July 31, 2024
City of Roseville
Attn: City Clerk Department
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678
ELECTRONICALLY SUBMITTED TO [email protected] Subject: Proposal for Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant Electrical Power System Capacity Expansion Project Design Services, RFP 08-127 Dear Selection Panel:

The electrical power system at the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant (PGWWTP) has reached three critical triggers, requiring system improvement and additional electrical capacity to maintain reliable electrical service at the plant. The City is looking for an engineering partner to support the design-assist delivery of this capacity expansion project. This support is best provided by a dedicated team that is already up to speed on the project and has already demonstrated its passion for collaboration and innovation. Carollo is committed to the City and your delivery team. We offer:
ƒ A thoughtful approach to facility design that prioritizes the City’s most pressing needs. We have developed an approach for project delivery that (1) prioritizes redundancy and electrical consolidation within the facility design for enhanced system resilience and flexibility, (2) provides options for the City’s consideration to maximize scope within available project budget, (3) will address operational, environmental, and regulatory needs to minimize related impacts during construction, and (4) embraces collaborative working sessions for efficient and ongoing transfer of knowledge to/from the City’s team. ƒ Collaborative partnership that the City can trust. Our team has worked in collaboration with the City to deliver several recent projects including the evaluation that identified the need for this work. We provide valuable team continuity with Beverly Hann, Jamshid “JD” Dorafsha, and Jeff West (all currently working with the City’s team to deliver electrical improvement projects at the Dry Creek WWTP and the Barton Road WTP) and several other team members who are currently working with the City’s team to complete design improvements for design-assist delivery at the Dry Creek WWTP. ƒ Proven electrical expertise. Our local design experience is supplemented with technical expertise from Chris Heger, Erik Bahnamen, and Marissa Petty, all with project-specific expertise in medium voltage design, backup generation design with all levels of emissions abatement, and various in-plant distribution loop configurations.

Carollo will perform the services and adhere to the requirements of your RFP. We look forward to continuing our record of quality service to the City of Roseville and we look forward to the opportunity to continue our record of quality service to the City.

Sincerely,
CAROLLO ENGINEERS, INC.

Beverly Hann, PE, PMP Jamshid Dorafsha, PE
Senior Project Manager Principal Lead Electrical Engineer Vice President Associate Vice President
Roseville / Document2
PRIMARY CONTACT:

Beverly Hann, PE, PMP
Vice President
Tel: 916-565-4888
Email: [email protected]
2880 Gateway Oaks Drive
Suite 300
Sacramento, California 95833
916.565.4888
Table of Contents
TAB A: FIRM’S QUALIFICATIONS
TAB B: EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES
TAB C: QUALIFICATIONS OF TEAM
TAB D: PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
TAB E: PROJECT PLAN
TAB F: COST PROPOSAL
TAB G: REQUIRED STATEMENTS/DOCUMENTS
TAB H: EXCEPTIONS
TAB I: COMPETENCY OF PROPOSERS
Tab A: Firm’s Qualifications

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024 1
B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\3-Tab A-FirmQuals

MANAGING DIRECTOR OF

CLIENT SERVICE

PROJECT

MANAGERS

QUALITY

MANAGERS

CLIENT SERVICE

MANAGERS

DISCIPLINE LEADS

SUPPORT STAFF

PROJECT ENGINEERS

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

PRESIDENT AND CEO
84ros1023po1-CorpOrgChart.ai
Tab A: Firm’s
Qualifications
Carollo offers you reliable
experience with effective
cost management
strategies, a top-notch
team, and proven results.

CAROLLO ENGINEERS, INC.

For 91 years, cities, utilities, and special districts of all sizes have counted on Carollo to help navigate increasingly complex water-related challenges. We work with our clients to cost-effectively and sustainably protect the environment and public health while meeting regulatory requirements and public expectations.

Water is all we do. While Carollo's focus is water, an integral part of all water projects are the electrical and instrumentation components of the facilities. To this end, Carollo has one of the largest electrical and instrumentation groups in the country dedicated to providing safe, reliable, and user friendly power and control systems.

FIRM ORGANIZATION
Carollo is a privately held corporation owned solely by our shareholders, who are all full-time employees of the firm. Of those shareholders, a select few form our Board of Directors, which governs the company. Our organization chart for all our projects is built on a foundation of strong client service and superior quality and project management. Successful project execution is achieved through a collaborative team of discipline leads, support staff, and subconsultants.

US-CanadaCarolloOffices-Blue-013024.ai
50+ offices in North America
| From 50+ offices across North America, Carollo
employees have provided planning and design and
construction services services for more than 2,000
public agencies across the United States.
| Corporate Organization Chart
Established 1933
Organization Corporation
Number of
Offices
50+ offices in
North America
Number of
Employees
1,400+
nationally
TAB A: FIRM’S QUALIFICATIONS
2 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\3-Tab A-FirmQuals

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024

SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED
By Carollo
Carollo will complete all design, contractor procurement support, on-site engineering, and engineering during
construction activities with in-house team members
proposed herein.

By Subconsultants
Subconsultants will provide:
ƒ Geotechnical – Fugro USA Land, Inc
ƒ Surveying – CTA Engineering & Surveying
ƒ Potholing – Arrow Construction
ƒ Environmental/CEQA Services – Ascent Environmental
ƒ Emission Abatement Permitting – Mizutani Environmental ƒ Arc Flash and Electrical Testing – ERS
ƒ Fire Protection/Suppression – Jensen Hughes

CAROLLO STAFFING LEVELS
Carollo has consistently grown in size over the last
ten years, attracting new industry talent focused
on water-related engineering. Carollo’s growth is
completely organic and has not been achieved through
acquisitions. The value to Roseville is clear. We have a healthy and growing group of committed technical staff
ready to help the City with this and future projects.
84ros0324pf1-StangLevels.ai
1,190
1,221
1,329
1,403
1,430
1,101
Carollo’s Stang Levels
1,000
1,100
1,200
Number of Employees 1,300
1,400
1,500
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Year

WE ARE LEADERS IN EI&C SERVICES
We’re an industry leader in the planning, design, and
implementation of EI&C and computerized SCADA/
telemetry systems for water and wastewater agencies.

As a water-focused process treatment consulting firm
we know how facilities operate and understand how
to integrate the design of a new electrical system
into treatment processes. Our clients range from
small municipalities to some of the largest utilities in the country with treatment plants that range in size
from under 1 mgd to more than 600 mgd with power
distribution systems from 480V to 115kV.

We Provide a Wide Range
of Design Services
Carollo offers a full suite of design services focused on electrical engineering, including planning and analysis, design, and implementation.
ƒ Electrical, Controls, and Instrumentation
Condition Assessment.
ƒ Power System Design (voltages from 480V
to 115kV).
ƒ Standby Power Generation at 480V to 115kV, with
both open and closed transition.
ƒ Tier 2 and Tier 4 power generation systems
complete with emissions treatment.
ƒ Coordination with electrical utility power and
protective relay requirements.
ƒ Safety by design to limit incident energy and remove
staff from directly interacting with power equipment.
ƒ Duct bank system designs including, radial, loop, and double loop in-plant distribution systems.
ƒ Instrumentation Design (P&IDs, Advanced Networks,
Installation Drawings, Calibration, Testing).
ƒ Electrical System Studies: Fault Current, Protective
Device Coordination, and Arc Flash for both existing
and new facilities.
ƒ Engineering Services During Construction.
ƒ Startup, Training, Commissioning.

Years in Business
91 CA Licensed Electrical
and Control System
Engineers
23+
Electrical Projects
in the last 10 years
2800+
EI&C Experts
135+
Years working with
the City of Roseville
26+

CAROLLO BY THE NUMBERS
TAB A: FIRM’S QUALIFICATIONS
3 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\3-Tab A-FirmQuals

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024
Our EI&C and SCADA Services are EPIC!
Our Equation is Simple: Best-in-class
Electrical + Programming + Instrumentation + Control = EPIC® Solutions EPIC® provides a one-stop shop for an array of electrical, programming, instrumentation, and control services from the planning phases to design and through implementation. These services include master plans; electrical systems and electrical system studies; fullservice electrical and I&C design; control and business systems network design; electrical safety programs; Cybersecurity program development; HMI and PLC migration; programming standards development; and PLC, DCS, and HMI programming. Our engineers and programmers use a unique collection of tools and methodologies to get stakeholder input and generate ideas that gain support and are financially defensible. With these plans, we help our clients manage their assets, migrate to new systems, and update their critical infrastructure so they can face the challenges that lie ahead.

CORE SERVICES
We leverage innovative tools such
as RESERVOIR®, an information
management system, to efficiently
coordinate cross-discipline efforts,
document assets, and minimize risk
through database management. We base
our selection on which tools are right for
your project, on the project’s unique
challenges and needs. We do not provide
“cookie cutter” designs. The purpose of
our tools is to automate the minutiae so we
can focus on our client’s specific needs.

ELECTRICAL
Power system designs focus on
energy reliability, power savings,
and sustainability. Our approach
incorporates “safety by design”,
to minimize incident energy
levels and shock hazards through
out the design period.

INSTRUMENTATION
AND CONTROL
From the simplistic to the
cutting edge, our I&C designs
are customized to provide
reliable, optimized control of
the power systems.

PROGRAMMING
Our programming group is
available to assist Roseville's
programming efforts for monitoring
and control of the power system for
optimal performance.

STRATEGIC SERVICES
Carollo's staff regularly works with
Client's IT departments to design
system that are compatible and
consistent with the client's HMI
systems. Carollo can also provide
third party Cybersecurity designs
and penetration testing.

INTEGRATION
DESIGN

PLANNING

IMPLEMENTATION
RESERVOIR®
Database
Driven
Power System
Database/Asset
Management
Integration
Automated
One-Line and
Equipment Layouts
from a single
database.

TAB A: FIRM’S QUALIFICATIONS
4 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\3-Tab A-FirmQuals

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024
| Carollo has delivered hundreds of electrical-related projects for clients throughout California. Our electrical, programming, instrumentation, and control services (EPIC®) engineers work with these clients to provide planning, studies, design, and construction services on their water-related projects.

The Right Experience
to Deliver Your Project
After 20+ years working with the City, we know
your facilities, staff, procedures, and standards
We bring a proven working relationship with City
staff, a thorough understanding of your project
delivery requirements, and a strong track record
working seamlessly with your teams to produce
quality projects. Recent project examples include:
ƒ PGWWTP Electrical System Evaluation.

Carollo completed the updated electrical
system capacity analysis for the Pleasant
Grove WWTP, which identified the capacity
upgrades necessary for reliable operation and
included in the Electrical Power System Capacity
Expansion Project.
ƒ PGWWTP Design and Construction Projects.
» Carollo delivered the first project at Pleasant
Grove—design and construction-phase
services for the $100-million, 12-mgd
greenfield facility in 2005.
» Carollo completed the first major PGWWTP
expansion to upgrade the secondary process,
provide new primary and solids processes,
and convert the facility to UV disinfection.
» Carollo completed design for the UV
Disinfection System Addition Project and is
working with the City during construction of
improvements via design-assist contract.
ƒ Electrical Projects. Carollo is working with
the City and our lead design-builder, Auburn
Constructors, to deliver the following electrical
projects via design-build:
» Dry Creek WWTP MCC and Switchgear
Replacement Project.
» Barton Road WTP MCC Replacement Project.

California Water
Service Company
City of Modesto
South Tahoe Public Utility District
City and County of San Francisco
Sacramento Area Sewer District
City of Carlsbad
City of South
San Francisco
City of Martinez
City of Riverside
City of Coulton
Coachella
Valley Water
District
Eastern Municipal
Water District
County of Santa Cruz
City of Watsonville
City of Los Angeles
City of San Diego
County of San Diego
City of Fresno
City of Tulare
City of Los Angeles,
Bureau of Sanitation
City of Tracy
City of Woodland
American Valley Community Services District
City of Sacramento
City of Chico
Contra Costa
Water District
Union Sanitary District
Inland Empire Utilities Agency
Metropolitan Water District
of Southern California
Jurupa Community
Services District
Modesto Irrigation District
City of Galt
El Dorado Irrigation District
Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District
City of Roseville
Delta Diablo
East Bay Municipal
Utility District
Marina Coast Water District
City of Livermore
Soquel Creek Water District
City of San Mateo
City of Sunnyvale
Valley Water
City of Porterville
City of Banning
City of
Palm Springs
City of Oxnard
City of Ventura
County of Santa Barbara
City of Glendale
City of Long Beach
City of Manteca
California-OnCallProjects_111723.ai
Carollo's EI&C group consists of more than 135
engineers and technicians, making this group one
of the largest in the water industry. This group of
dedicated electrical and instrumentation engineers
and technicians, along with our process, mechanical,
structural, architectural, and civil engineering groups are exceptionally qualified to provide the wide variety of technical skills required to plan, design, and implement your project.

Tab B: Experience
and References
5 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\4-Tab B-ExpRefs

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024
Client and ProjectElectrical Design
Standby PowerSwitchgearMotor Control CentersLow- and/or MediumVoltage DistributionInstrumentation DesignArc Flash MitigationEngineering Services During Construction Documentation, Startup, Training Regional San, CA – Echowater TTF/NST/RAS ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Portland Bureau of Environmental Services, OR –
Blower System and Building Rehabilitation
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, CA –
Southeast Plant Headworks
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
City of Oklahoma City, OK – Draper Water Treatment
Plant Power Generator Facilities WT-0138
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
American Valley, CA –WWTP Improvements Project ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Clean Water Services, Portland, OR – PPS-1 15kV
Switchgear Replacement
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Orange County Sanitation District, CA – Headworks
Rehabilitation and Expansion
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
City of Tacoma, WA, – Central Treatment Plant
Electrical Upgrades
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
City of Martinez, CA – Electrical Upgrade Project ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ City of Livermore, CA – Primary and
Secondary Improvements
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
City of Arcata, CA – WWTP Improvements ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Town of Gilbert, AZ – Greenfield Water Reclamation
Plant, Phase III Expansion
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Albuquerque Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority,
NM – On-Call Services
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
West County Wastewater, CA – Electrical Improvements
Project, 12KV Switchgear and 480V MCCs
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
City of Sunnyvale, CA – Primary Treatment Upgrades ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ City of Fresno, CA – Southeast WTF Design ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Valley Water, CA – Rinconada Electrical Upgrades ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ City of Aurora, CO – Wemlinger WPF Improvements ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Kern County, CA – WTP Upgrade ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
San Diego, CA – North City Pure Water Facility ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ City of Oceanside, CA – Weese Filtration Plant
Major Improvements
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
City of Daytona Beach, FL – Westside Regional WRF
Emergency Generator Updates
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
When it comes to electrical system
safety, planning, design, replacement,
constructability, and start up services for
electrical distribution systems, experience
matters. Our team of experts, will help you
achieve your goals for this project.

Tab B: Experience
and References
TAB B: EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES
6 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\4-Tab B-ExpRefs

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024
EchoWater Program
Sacramento Area Sewer District, CA
Carollo provided design, construction phase support, and commissioning assistance on four of the seven projects that made up Sac Sewer's $1.7 billion EchoWater Project, three of which included significant electrical power distribution upgrades described below.

Tertiary Treatment Facilities: This project included a
330-mgd filter influent pump station, 217 mgd of granular media filters, and ancillary pumping, storage, and chemical treatment facilities. New electrical facilities included two (2) new 12kV substations that feed three (3) 12kV doubleended transformer sets (all housed in/around 4 new electrical buildings).

Nitrifying Sidestream Treatment: Project included nitrifying sequencing batch reactors for ammonia reduction in the
solids treatment system supernatant. New electrical
facilities included two (2) new 12kV substations feeding 480V switchgear and MCC for power distribution to new facilities (all housed in/around new electrical building).

Return Activated Sludge Pumping: Project replaced 48
return activated sludge pumps (210-mgd total capacity) and all associated piping. Associated electrical improvements included modifications to existing MCC lineups, new MCCs, and harmonic filters and new VFDs for all 48 RAS pumps.

Relevance:
ƒ Medium voltage power distribution in WWTP.
ƒ Arc flash incident energy protection for all new switchgear. ƒ Remote switchgear racking through PLC control.

REFERENCE
Mr. Nate Cullen, Wastewater Treatment Department Director 503-547-8176
[email protected]

PROJECT DATES
2013 to Ongoing

TEAM MEMBERS
Beverly Hann - PIC, JD Dorafsha - Electrical, Erik Bahneman - Electrical, Daniel Robinson - I&C, James Doering - Structural,
Ryan Hook - Technical Advisor
PPS-1 15kV
Switchgear Replacement
Clean Water Services, Portland, OR
Carollo initially completed an evaluation of the power
distribution system at the Rock Creek Advanced Wastewater Treatment Facility as part of an Electrical Master Plan, which ultimately identified the replacement of existing 15kV switchgear PPS-1, existing 15kV switchgear 1OOSWGR-IA/1B, and existing 480V switchboard SWBD-4.

Carollo completed preliminary design and worked with the utility to prepare a pre-purchase package for the new 15kV PPS-1 switchgear. The final facility also included relocation of secondary unit substation transformers TU-3 and TU-4, demolition and rerouting of 15KV duct bank and existing electrical gear, and a detailed sequence of work to avoid service interruptions during commissioning.

JD worked closely with the contractor during construction as approximately half of the facility loads were transferred from PPS-1 to new electrical facilities without any significant facility shutdowns.

Relevance:
ƒ Implementation of dual utility power feeds for additional redundancy and resilience.
ƒ Medium voltage power distribution.
ƒ Detailed construction sequencing to minimize
facility shutdowns.

REFERENCE
Mr. Nate Cullen, Wastewater Treatment Department Director 503-547-8176
[email protected]

PROJECT DATES
2022 to Ongoing

TEAM MEMBERS
JD Dorafsha - Electrical, James Doering - Structural
TAB B: EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES
7 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\4-Tab B-ExpRefs

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024
Southeast Water Pollution Control
Plant 020 Headworks
City and County of San Francisco, CA
Carollo designed a new 250-mgd headworks facility to replace two existing aging headworks facilities. The new facility significantly increases screening and grit removal and provides increased reliability in an urban environment with very limited site space. The headworks facilities include an influent junction structure, multi-rake bar screens, screenings handling, grit basins, grit handling using Coanda grit classifiers, flow splitting/ distribution structures, odor control scrubbers, and electrical/ control buildings. The project will also retrofit and rehabilitate new electrical facilities, an existing influent lift station, and major structural modifications to the pier supported structure to address current seismic design requirements. Controls for the new and retrofit facilities will tie-in to the existing plant DCS and provide full remote automatic control for dry weather and wet weather operation.

The new electrical facilities include two double-ended
substations with medium voltage step-down transformers.

One substation serves the headworks and one substation
services the odor control facility. Both substations are installed in prefabricated electrical enclosures (powerhouse) and installed at an elevation above projected sea level rise. Equipment monitoring is done by power meters on the main breakers networked to the DCS and SEL power meters networked to an electrical monitoring system.

Relevance:
ƒ Double-ended substations with medium voltage
step-down transformers.
ƒ Networked power metering.
ƒ Design, construction support, and commissioning.

REFERENCE
Jignesh Desai
Senior Project Manager
415-200-8749
[email protected]

PROJECT DATES
2017 to Ongoing

TEAM MEMBER
Erik Bahneman - EI&C, James Doering - Structural
Draper Water Treatment Plant
Power Generator Facilities WT-0138
City of Oklahoma City, OK
This project consisted of the design of three-2725 kW Tier 4-Final diesel generators that operate in parallel with the utility to provide backup for 100-150 mgd of treatment
capacity at the Draper WTP.

Carollo closely coordinated the electrical system studies and power availability studies during design to confirm that the system would meet the safety and operational needs of the plant during design and into construction. Carollo applied arcflash stickers and safety training for staff at the conclusion of the project.

The project involved an aggressive schedule and extensive coordination with Oklahoma City Water Utilities Trust and OG&E to incorporate FEMA and CDBG Federal grant funding sources. Carollo teamed with the City, a pre-purchase
contractor, and building/installation contractor to complete the work successfully, without affecting plant operations.

Carollo designed 4.16kV generator paralleling switchgear and a generator building, with provisions to add one
additional 2725 kW prime diesel engine generator in the future, including all connections to interface with the existing Auxiliary High Service Pump Station service switchgear.

Additionally, the design included a sound-attenuated structure rated for EF-2 tornado wind speeds to house the generators, switchgear, and auxiliary systems for Tier 4 system operation.

Relevance:
ƒ New electrical and generator building to house
electrical gear, Tier 4 standby generators, and
ancillary emission treatment systems.
ƒ Sound attenuation for generators.
ƒ Short Circuit Analysis/Arc Flash Studies.

REFERENCE
Mr. Sam Samandi
505-280-8935
[email protected]

PROJECT DATES
2015 to 2018

TEAM MEMBERS
Chris Heger - Lead electrical engineer, Marissa Petty - Electrical design TAB B: EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES
8 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\4-Tab B-ExpRefs

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024
Blower System and
Building Rehabilitation
Portland Bureau of Environmental Services, OR
Carollo is leading the Blower System and Building
Rehabilitation project for Portland BES. Carollo’s approach will help BES increase process reliability, efficiency, and sustainability.

This project presents a significant opportunity for the Bureau to not only replace the blowers, but to permanently reduce its power cost and carbon footprint using a holistic view of the associated aeration system, electrical power distribution system, and the buildings housing these components.

Carollo is developing an approach to incorporate improved performance and cost savings into this project.

Carollo is designing an upgraded electrical system to replace the existing 5KV 1,500HP blowers with new 5KV 2,000HP
blowers. The electrical modifications required for the upgrade will include replacement of existing 12KV switchgear, 5KV blower starters, 480V motor control center, and redistribution of the 15KV distribution loop originating from the 15KV arcresistant switchgear to feed the new 12KV-480V substation transformer for the blower building.

Facility design is scheduled for completion by end of 2025, with planned contractor bidding in early 2026.

Relevance:
ƒ Cost/benefit analysis for project alternatives.
ƒ Medium voltage power distribution.
ƒ Arc-resistent switchgear replacement.

REFERENCE
Mr. Yang Zhang, Project Engineer
503-823-7633
[email protected]

PROJECT DATES
2022 to Ongoing (2027)

TEAM MEMBER
JD Dorafsha - EI&C
Headworks Rehabilitation
and Expansion
Orange County Sanitation District, CA
The existing electrical systems providing power to Plant 1 headworks had to be brought up to current OC San design standards for critical “water in/water out” facilities. Through close collaboration with OC San staff, Carollo’s EI&C team evaluated a series of alternatives to accomplish the client's objectives. We collectively established solid concepts to replace all of the existing power distribution equipment at Power Building 3A with new equipment, strategically located in separate buildings/rooms for improved reliability and constructability that included paralleling 4 new -2500kW, 3,125kVA, 12.47kV engine generators using hybrid grounding for better protection of the synchronous alternators.

We have already identified several components of a
detailed construction sequencing plan that will be critical to maintaining electrical reliability at all times during construction, provide the ability to fully test all new equipment and systems, and transfer loads safely and efficiently.

Relevance:
ƒ Overlapping zones of high-impedance differential
protection to provide equipment protection and reduce the arc-flash incident energy levels.
ƒ Paralleled generators with hybrid grounding for
synchronous alternator protection.
ƒ Maintaining Level-3 power to existing headworks loads during transfer of existing standby generators.

REFERENCE
Mr. Donald Cutler, Engineering Supervisor
714-593-7803
[email protected]

PROJECT DATES
2022 to Present (est. 2027)

TEAM MEMBERS
Jeff West - Electrical
TAB B: EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES
9 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\4-Tab B-ExpRefs

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024
Central Treatment Plant
Electrical Upgrades
City of Tacoma, WA
Carollo provided engineering services to replace and add reliability to the aging medium voltage electrical distribution system at the Central Treatment Plants.

The project included the replacement of the plant's main 15kV service entrance switchgear and repowering the existing transformers and load centers from the new switchgear.

The Carollo team added more than 3,000 lineal feet of
concrete encased reinforced duct bank, installed over 20 miles of medium voltage electrical cables, constructed a 3,400 square-foot building for storing and operating the new electrical equipment, and installed a new 15kV switchgear with pad-mounted transformers.

Carollo led technical conversations with Tacoma Power
to coordinate a new primary service connection to the
Central Treatment Plant and provided permitting and
easement support.

Carollo also provided technical on-site/office support during construction and startup/commissioning assistance, Carollo’s electrical advisor/inspector provided training of City inspector personnel and part-time field observation of medium voltage infrastructure installation for activities, such as setting up electrical inspection protocols, identifying critical project junctures, and minor deviations to field routing.

Relevance:
ƒ New primary service connection from power utility.
ƒ Radial medium voltage distribution with full redundancy for all critical process areas.
ƒ Major electrical upgrades to increase plant reliability.

REFERENCE
Mr. Max Drathman, PE
Senior Engineering Project Manager
253-502-2276
[email protected]

PROJECT DATES
2022 to Ongoing

TEAM MEMBERS
JD Dorafsha - Electrical, James Doering - Structural
WWTP Improvements Project
American Valley Community Service District, CA
Carollo completed design and provided engineering services during construction and full-time on-site construction
management and inspection services for the American Valley WWTP Improvements project. The project included new
headworks facilities, new secondary treatment facilities, solids digestion and dewatering facilities, disinfection and chemical system improvements, and ancillary storage basin and effluent outfall pipeline improvements.

New electrical facilities were required to support
improvements including an upsized electrical service, new power distribution facilities, a new backup power generator, and a new SCADA system for full facility operation.

Relevance:
ƒ Coordination with power supplier for new/upsized power feed for increased WWTP power capacity.
ƒ New power distribution facilities, housed in new Title24 compliant building.
ƒ Full service support from design through training and O&M Manual development.

REFERENCE
Mrs. Katie Nunn, General Manager
530-283-0836
[email protected]

PROJECT DATES
2019 to 2023

TEAM MEMBERS
Beverly Hann - Project manager, JD Dorafsha - Electrical, Daniel Robinson - I&C, James Doering - Structural, Ryan Hook - Civil, Chad Green - Mechanical, Michele Hollenbaugh - Architect, Arrow Construction - Potholing, Ascent Environmental, Inc. - Environmental/CEQA
Tab C:

Qualifications
of Team
10 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\5-Tab C-QualsOfTeam-V2

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024
Electrical
Subconsultant
Erik Bahneman, PE - Lead
Marissa Petty, PE*
Jeff rey West
Geotechnical
Fugro USA Land, Inc
Surveying
CTA Engineering & Surveying
Fire Protection
Jensen Hughes
I&C
Daniel Robinson, PE
Civil
Ryan Hook, PE
Structural
James Doering, PE, SE
Architectural
Michele Hollenbaugh, RA*
Building Services
Chad Green, PE
Cost Estimating
Jason Rozgony, PE*
Project Manager
Beverly Hann, PE, PMP
Design Manager
Jamshid (JD) Dorafsha, PE
QA/QC
Chris Heger, PE*
Electrical Field Services
Brian Ream
WW Process/Sequencing
Jenny Warren, PE*
Potholing
Arrow Construction
Environmental/CEQA Services
Ascent Environmental
Constructability
Ewing Construction Services
Emissions Abatement/Permitting
Mizutani Environmental
Arc Flash and Electrical Testing
ERS
* Licensed in a state other
than California

THE RIGHT TEAM FOR ROSEVILLE
We have assembled an optimal team based on a simple but powerful principle—put the most qualified people in the roles essential to help you make sound decisions and deliver a successful project. Our team consists of local and familiar individuals supplemented with technical experts to address the specific needs of your project. The individuals shown in the organization chart below will be committed to this project from start to finish.

Beverly will manage your project from our local office in Sacramento with participation of several key staff from our nearby office in Walnut Creek and a strong bench of supplemental in-house EPIC®, structural, and architectural staff.

Tab C: Qualifications of Team
The benefit of Carollo's team is familiarity with your
facilities, procedures, and staff, as well as experience spanning numerous electrical upgrade projects.

TAB C: QUALIFICATIONS OF TEAM
11 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\5-Tab C-QualsOfTeam-V2

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024
Proposed Team Members
* Licensed in a state other than California
OFFICE LOCATION: Sacramento
YEARS WITH CAROLLO: 19
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 21
AVAILABILITY: 25%
Beverly is a Carollo Senior Project
Manager bringing 21 years of
experience in all aspects of water
and wastewater treatment facilities
from planning to construction, with
the last 5 years working closely
with the City of Roseville on several
projects. She has successfully
led a diverse range of projects –
everything from headworks for
municipal wastewater treatment
plants to industrial water recycling
facilities. She knows how to best
leverage technical expertise within
the company to get projects done.

OFFICE LOCATION: Walnut Creek
YEARS WITH CAROLLO: 18
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 32
AVAILABILITY: 50%
JD is Carollo’s EPIC Regional Lead
for Northern California and brings
32 years of experience designing,
managing, and providing electrical
and instrumentation engineering
services for municipal, institutional,
and government projects. JD has
extensive design expertise in
both medium and high-voltage
electrical distribution systems, as
well as preparation of arc-flash and
coordination studies, short circuit
studies, and condition assessment of
electrical systems.

Proposed Team Members
Beverly Hann, PE, PMP

PROJECT

MANAGER
JD
Dorafsha, PE

DESIGN MANAGER
OFFICE LOCATION: Sacramento
YEARS WITH CAROLLO: 11
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 24
AVAILABILITY: 40%
Daniel has 23 years of I&C
experience in the water/wastewater
industry, including 480VAC
electrical distribution systems;
variable frequency drives, reduced
voltage soft starters, and fullvoltage motor control design; PLC and control panel design; process
instrumentation; UL, NEC, NEMA,
and NFPA 70E requirements; and
relay/ladder logic.

Daniel
Robinson, PE
I&C
OFFICE LOCATION: Sacramento
YEARS WITH CAROLLO: 21
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 22
AVAILABILITY: 40%
Ryan has 23 years of civil
engineering experience. He has
served as construction manager,
lead inspector, design engineer,
project engineer, and civil engineer.

Ryan's engineering expertise
includes planning, analysis, design,
and construction of wastewater
treatment facilities, wastewater pump
stations and pipelines, and potable
water pump stations and pipelines,
as well as preparation and review of
plans and specifications.

Ryan
Hook, PE

CIVIL LEAD
OFFICE LOCATION: Walnut Creek
YEARS WITH CAROLLO: 12
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 16
AVAILABILITY: 40%
Erik is a lead electrical engineer
with 16 years of experience in
design and construction support
of electrical and control systems
for water and wastewater facilities,
as well as design of switchgear,
motor controls, instrumentation,
and SCADA systems. The City
will benefit from Erik’s ability to
coordinate his electrical designs
with civil, structural, and mechanical
disciplines during both the design
and construction phases of
the project.

Erik
Bahneman, PE

ELECTRICAL LEAD
OFFICE LOCATION: Denver
YEARS WITH CAROLLO: 16
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 16
AVAILABILITY: 15%
Chris serves as Carollo's Electrical
Chief and brings 16 years of
experience in electrical and
instrumentation design for both
water and wastewater treatment
facilities. He has extensive
experience in medium voltage
design, including design of power
generation systems and automatic
controls, and P&ID development.

Chris' experience includes protective
device coordination studies,
extensive field investigation of
electrical and instrumentation
equipment and development of
power availability studies.

Chris
Heger, PE*
QA/QC
TAB C: QUALIFICATIONS OF TEAM
12 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\5-Tab C-QualsOfTeam-V2

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024
OFFICE LOCATION: Albuquerque
YEARS WITH CAROLLO: 16
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 16
AVAILABILITY: 50%
Marissa specializes in
electrical and instrumentation
design and construction
management of wastewater
treatment facilities. Her
electrical experience
includes power distribution,
lighting, motor controls, high
voltage, and grounding. She
is also experienced in the
coordination of electrical
and instrumentation work
with civil, structural, and
mechanical work during
design and construction.

Her diverse experience has
given her an opportunity to
work with multiple clients and
contractors directly in the field
to identify and solve issues.

OFFICE LOCATION: Denver
YEARS WITH CAROLLO: 4
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 12
AVAILABILITY: 50%
Jeff joined Carollo in 2019 as
an electrical engineer and
has experience with water
and wastewater projects.

He has been responsible
for the development of 100
percent electrical design
and specifications, as well as
engineering services during
construction. His recent
electrical work includes
several projects for Alameda
County Flood Control and
Water Conservation District,
Orange County Sanitation
District, Veolia Water/City
of Richmond, and the City
of Roseville.

OFFICE LOCATION: Reno
YEARS WITH CAROLLO: 3
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 21
AVAILABILITY: 25%
Jenny is a Design Manager
and process engineer
with expertise in all
aspects of wastewater
engineering, including
project management, design,
permitting, studies, and
construction administration.

Jenny has completed
multiple wastewater
treatment plant process
improvement projects in each
phase of treatment for plants
up to 50 mgd.

Jenny
Warren, PE*

WW PROCESS
AND SEQUENCING
Jason
Rozgony, PE*

COST ESTIMATING
OFFICE LOCATION: Fort Collins
YEARS WITH CAROLLO: 10
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 30+
AVAILABILITY: 25%
Brian is a master electrician
specializing in electrical and
control systems for water
and wastewater facilities.

He brings expertise in EI&C
designs, constructability
reviews, and experience
in I&C inspection. Brian's
experience as field operations
manager for an electrical
contractor provides him with
the right balance of design
and construction experience
to provide electrical support in
the sequencing of equipment
installation and potential cost
benefits that may result from
sequencing alternatives.

OFFICE LOCATION: Denver
YEARS WITH CAROLLO: 6
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 29
AVAILABILITY: 25%
Jason’s experience has
focused on cost estimating
for engineering projects and
“at-risk,” CMAR, design-build,
and hard-bid projects. He
has developed corporate
estimating standards and
has managed estimating
staff across the United
States. Jason has prepared
discipline-level estimates
and has led complete
estimates for more than
250 design and fixed
price construction projects
requiring collaboration
with design engineers,
vendors, and subcontractors
from preliminary through
final design.

OFFICE LOCATION: Dallas
YEARS WITH CAROLLO: 11
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 15
AVAILABILITY: 25%
Chad is an associate vice
president and principal
building mechanical engineer
with Carollo. He manages
Carollo’s Building Services
Group and supervises all
aspects of design services
and quality control for
the company related
to building mechanical.

Chad is well-known for
developing innovative
recommendations for
facility upgrades and design
options and possesses
in-depth background
performing generator system
designs and planning for
wastewater facilities.

Brian
Ream

ELECTRICAL FIELD

SERVICES
Chad
Green, PE

BUILDING

SERVICES
OFFICE LOCATION: Phoenix
YEARS WITH CAROLLO: 9
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 23
AVAILABILITY: 40%
Michele is a detail-oriented
professional architect with
23 years of experience in the
design, delivery, construction,
and management of water
and wastewater treatment
plants. Her work experience
includes renovation to
existing construction, plant
design, administration
buildings, laboratories,
maintenance buildings,
operational buildings,
pump stations, and
tenant improvements.

Michele
Hollenbaugh,
RA*

ARCHITECTURAL
LEAD
* Licensed in a state other than California
Marissa
Petty, PE*

ELECTRICAL
DESIGN
Jeffrey
West

ELECTRICAL
DESIGN
OFFICE LOCATION: Orange County
YEARS WITH CAROLLO: 23
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 31
AVAILABILITY: 25%
James has 31 years of
experience in structural
analysis, design, seismic
retrofit, rehabilitation,
review, and assessment
for a variety of structures,
such as wastewater and
water treatment facilities,
pump stations, reservoirs,
tanks, clarifiers, large pipe
supports, retaining walls, and
operations and maintenance
facilities. He is Carollo’s
structural lead engineer.

James
Doering,
PE, SE

STRUCTURAL
LEAD
TAB C: QUALIFICATIONS OF TEAM
13 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\5-Tab C-QualsOfTeam-V2

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024
OFFICE LOCATION: Sacramento
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 50+
Mr. Bajuniemi brings vast experience
in water and wastewater treatment
plant projects covering a wide
rage of services for new site
investigation, expansion projects.

He has led Fugro’s work on
previous geotechnical assessments
at the City's Pleasant Grove
Wastewater Treatment Plant. Mr.

Bajuniemi supervises and guides
the activities of the geotechnical
engineers and geologists during
the design phase of all projects.

His extensive geotechnical work
has been effective in delivering
timely and cost-effective
geotechnical investigations.

OFFICE LOCATION: Sacramento
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 39
Mr. Burns has been involved with
various aspects of the surveying,
mapping and construction profession
in the Greater Sacramento region.

Previous work experience has
provided him the opportunity to
successfully complete projects
throughout the State of California.

As Surveyor/Survey Manager, Mr.

Burns draws on this experience,
his knowledge of technologies and
his project management skills to
ensure that projects are successfully
completed, on time and on budget.

Damon is currently supporting
Carollo on the Dry Creek WWTP
Biofilter Replacement Project.

Ronald L.

Bajuniemi, PE*

GEOTECHNICAL
Fugro USA
Land, Inc.

Damon
Burns, PLS

SURVEYING
CTA Engineering and
Surveying
OFFICE LOCATION: Concord
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 33
Courtney has 33 years of
engineering experience. Her primary
area of expertise is regulatory, with
an emphasis on air permitting and
regulatory evaluations for municipal
facilities in the Bay Area Air Quality
Management District, Placer County
Air Pollution Control District, San
Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control
District, and South Coast Air Quality
Management District. Courtney
is currently supporting Carollo
on the Dry Creek WWTP Biofilter
Replacement Project.

Courtney
Mizutani

EMISSIONS ABATEMENT/

PERMITTING
Mizutani Environmental
To complete our Team, we have our
friends from ERS, Jensen Hughes,
and Ewing Construction Services.

For more than 50 years, ERS' team
of NETA certified engineers and
technicians have dedicated their
time and shared their expertise to
foster a safe and reliable world. ERS
is an electrical engineering and
testing company that will provide arc
flash and electrical testing services
to reduce risk and secure regulatory
compliance for your project.

Jensen Hughes, an industry
leader in their field, will provide fire
protection consulting and bid-level
design services for the project.

Ewing Construction has more
than 40 years of construction
experience with particular emphasis
in planning and construction
of water/wastewater treatment
plants and other water resource/
recovery projects and will provide
constructabiity reviews for our team.

OFFICE LOCATION: Sacramento
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 9
Will brings 9 years of experience as
a project manager and estimator. He
has managed many projects of this
scope, size, and complexity, including
advertising, estimating, RFI's, cost
and data analysis, report formatting
for management or customer review,
vetting out contract verbiage, and
also the Project Management
side of the operation, including
submittals, tracking and managing
costs, developing deliverables to
meet the specific needs of the given
customer, scheduling, updating
budgets, coordinating directly
with superintendents, inspectors,
and municipalities.

Will
Wegener

POTHOLING
Arrow Construction
OFFICE LOCATION: Sacramento
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 20
Stephanie has assisted with
preparation of CEQA and NEPA,
documents, habitat conservation
plans, resource management plans,
and permit packages. Her project
experience includes work on
public and private sector projects,
including wastewater treatment,
public facilities, water resources,
flood control, and development
projects. Stephanie’s responsibilities
include project management
and coordination as well as
writing, editing, and compiling the
various sections of environmental
documents. She understands
the regulatory guidelines and
legal requirements, as well as the
fundamentals of preparing and
delivering these documents.

Stephanie
Rasmussen

ENVIRONMENTAL/

CEQA SERVICES
Ascent Environmental
* Licensed in a state other than California

SUBCONSULTANTS
Tab D: Project
Understanding
14 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\6-Tab D-ProjUnd

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024
Tab D: Project Understanding
Carollo's recent evaluation of your electrical power
system identified the deficiencies that trigger this
capacity expansion project.

Carollo worked with the City's team to evaluate the capacity of the electrical power system at the WWTP, updating our previous electrical planning projections based on completed and in-process construction of new facilities and measured electrical maximum demand power usage. This evaluation resulted in three events that triggered this project:

Projected exceedance of the
existing 4 mega-watt (MW)
electric service capacity.

Projected exceedance
of the existing standby
generation capacity.

Excessive fault current at the
switchgear during closedtransition operation of the
standby generators.
☑This will be addressed with
an upsized power service
to PGWWTP.
☑This will be addressed
through (1) the addition
of two new 12KV, 2.5MW
standby generators
connected to a new 12KV
service switchgear, and (2)
the removal of the existing
480V generators from
the electrical distribution
system (since the need
for load shedding during
power outages will
be eliminated).
☑This will also be addressed
by the addition of the
new standby generators
since the closed transition
switching operation will be
implemented at the new
12KV service switchgear.

The City has decided to include future (buildout) electrical loads in this electrical expansion project, thus expanding the overall facility plan presented in the 2022 Carollo evaluation. This will require additional effort to determine the best approach for upsizing the power feed to the WWTP to incorporate redundancy, how to maximize the overall scope within the budget available for the project, and how to navigate the various operational, environmental, and regulatory needs with minimized impact at the plant.

Our approach summarizes several critical factors for the project that will require strong collaboration between the Carollo and City project teams for project success:

Right-sizing the new electrical
system for future loads.

Maintaining the existing 4MW
power service to increase the longterm capacity and resilience of the WWTP’s power supply.

Balancing redundancy against cost
for in-plant electrical distribution.

Designing your facility for
safety, efficiency, ease of O&M,
and future expansion.

Planning for anticipated emission
treatment requirements now to
save money in the future.

Minimizing plant shutdowns with
informed construction sequencing.

TAB D: PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
15 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\6-Tab D-ProjUnd

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024
With the expectation that a treatment capacity
upgrade may be necessary at the WWTP in the
near-term and given the overall cost/complexity of
electrical system upgrades, it is logical for the City
to design the electrical power feed and distribution
facilities for the ultimate build-out condition. Sizing the system adequately now for future needs is a
critical factor for long-term success of the project.

We completed a preliminary estimate for the
electrical capacity requirements for the WWTP based
on current plus expected future electrical need for
systems and equipment master planned for the buildout condition. Our preliminary evaluation resulted in a connected load demand of approximately 763 amps,
or 405 amps (7.9MW) using the demand factor of 0.53.

Right-sizing the new electrical system for future loads.

A new 1,200 amp, 12KV switchgear will have sufficient
capacity to supply power to plant loads through the
future expansions (34% loaded at build out condition).

Additionally, per the 2022 Carollo TM, the existing
480V switchgears are between 25% to 60% loaded
during the worst-case scenario condition (when the
switchgears tie breakers are closed). As a result,
existing 480V switchgears located downstream of
the new electrical facilities proposed for this project can remain in place and handle the addition of 480V
loads in their vicinity in future.

We are ready to hit the floor running! One of our
first orders of business will be to work with the City
to confirm the findings of this preliminary evaluation
so that we can complete other alternative evaluations
and move efficiently into design.

New MVSA-A/B 12KV Switchgear Demand Projection
Equipment Capacity/
Rating
Calculated Connected
Load Demand (Amps)
Estimated/Metered
Demand (Amps)
% Loaded (Ratio of Existing
Loads to Total Capacity)
2022 DF(5) Meter DF Meter
Existing 12KV MVSA(1) 1,200 473 251 158 21 13
Build-out Loads (1)(2) - 290(3) 154 - - -
New MVS-A/B (4) 1,200 763 405 N/A (5) 34 N/A (5)
Preliminary estimates for projected electrical demand indicate that a minimum electrical service size of 763 amps (approximately 8MW) will be required for the build-out condition at the WWTP. (1) Values from Electrical Power System Capacity Evaluation TM (2022). (2) Estimated additional electrical demand for build-out condition. (3) Based on estimated future load of 6,000 horsepower for future projects. (4) Based on the demand factor (DF) of 0.53 calculated in the Electrical Power System Capacity Evaluation TM Carollo’s 2022). (5) N/A – Not Available
TAB D: PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
16 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\6-Tab D-ProjUnd

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024
The City is considering an 8 to 10 MW service,
depending on utility substation available capacity.

This range should provide the necessary power
supply but will be mostly encumbered when the
build-out condition occurs (i.e. a build-out demand of

7.9MW will reach 100% capacity if a new 8MW service
is installed and 80% of capacity of a new 10MW
service is installed). Given this, it would be prudent
for the City to pursue an option to keep the existing
4MW service as an alternate/supplemental
power service.

If found feasible in discussion with Roseville Electric, the City could install the necessary provisions for the new 8 to 10MW service on City’s property while the
existing 4MW service and 12KV switchgear continue
to supply power to the plant (thus, avoiding power
interruptions during construction). Ultimately, the
existing 4MW service could be rerouted to connect
to the new 12KV switchgear after the construction of
the new electrical building and 12KV switchgear is
completed to increase the capacity, redundancy, and
resilience of the overall electrical supply to the plant. | JD worked with Clean Water Services to evaluate (and ultimately implement) two separate utility services for the PPS-1 15KV Switchgear Replacement Project. Two underground utility services were intercepted and rerouted to the new PPS-1 switchgear to provide additional resiliency, redundancy, and reliability to the Rockcreek WWTP.

Maintaining the existing 4MW power service
to increase the long-term capacity and
resilience of the WWTP’s power supply.

TAB D: PROJECT UNDERSTANDING

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024 17
B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\6-Tab D-ProjUnd It will also be important to work with the City’s team to evaluate different options for in-plant electrical distribution so that the final design meets the City’s goals for redundancy without unnecessary overspending. Our team has developed some preliminary options for the City’s consideration, all which assume that (1) the existing 4MW utility service is maintained and (2) the new 12KV utility service is routed through the Blue Oaks substation.

Alternative 1: Primary (12KV) radial distribution with each double-ended substation transformer connected directly to bus A or bus B of the new 12KV switchgear.

The new switchgear will have four separate busses; bus A and bus B on either end and standby and cogen busses in the middle. With this alternative, single and/or double-ended substation transformers would be connected directly to busses A and B with new 12KV feeder cables. New and future standby diesel generators would be connected to the standby bus, and the existing and new microturbine cogeneration units would be connected to the Cogen bus.

Possible Duct Bank Routing at PGWWTP
This configuration allows the standby generators and/or the microturbines to supply power to the plant from either bus A or bus B for greater resiliency and redundancy.

Future Diesel
Standby Generators
52 52 52 52 52
New Diesel
Standby Generators
52 52 52 52
52 52
Existing MVSA
Existing Electrical
Building No. 1
New Electrical
Building No. 3
New MVS-A
New MVS
-COGEN New MVS-B
New MVS-Standby
Roseville Electric
Blue Oaks Substation
Roseville Electric
Fiddyment Substation
Future
SWGR-4000

A B A B
Future
SWGR-5000
52 52 52 52 52
SWGR-1000
SWGR-3000A B
SWGR-2000
A B
Existing Cogens
PG88-MTRB-00100-480V
52 Roseville Electric
Fiddyment Substation
52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52
52 52 52 52 52
LEGEND
Existing
New
Future
Demolish
84sac0424pf-FIGURES03.ai
Future Cogeneration
52 Spare
(Typical)
Spare
(Typical)
Spare
(Typical)
| Preliminary one-line diagram for Alternative 1

BENEFIT BENEFIT
Added flexibility with standby generator and/or microturbine power supply to the plant from either bus A or bus B.

Dedicated 12KV feeders for substation transformers will provide good redundancy but will be an expensive option.

Balancing redundancy against cost
for in-plant electrical distribution
FUTURE PMSs FOR EXISTING
SUBSTATION T-1000A/B &
SWGR-1000A/B

FUTURE MANHOLES
AND PMSs
NEW PMSs FOR EXISTING
SUBSTATION T-2000A/B &
SWGR-2000A/B
NEW PMSs FOR

EXISTING SUBSTATION
T-3000/SWGR-3000

NEW ELECTRICAL
BUILDING #3

DUCTBANKS

NEW MANHOLE FOR

MICROTURBINES
West Park Drive

NOT TO SCALE
The 12KV duct bank routing shown here would work for all Alternatives, noting that the PMSs would be used for Alternatives 2 and 3 only and the future routing shown is an approximate representation of how Alternative 3 could be implemented.

TAB D: PROJECT UNDERSTANDING

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024 18
B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\6-Tab D-ProjUnd Alternative 2: Primary (12KV) selective distribution system with multiple loops.

This alternative uses the same 12KV switchgear bus arrangement as that described for Alternative 1 but uses a single 12KV loop routed through the plant to supply power to existing substation transformers and switchgears 1000, 2000, and 3000 via pad-mounted switches (PMSs). The advantage of this alternative is the cost savings for running a single 12KV loop and duct bank through the plant as compared to the cost for individual 12KV feeders for each substation transformer (Alternative 1). Additional feeder loops can be added for future substation transformers when required.

Alternative 3: Single 12KV loop primary selective distribution system.

This alternative uses the same 12KV switchgear bus arrangement as Alternatives 1 and 2, but uses a single 12KV loop to supply power to existing and future substations via PMSs. Additional PMSs would be required for this alternative as part of the current project, but the long-term cost would be less than Alternative 2 since additional 12KV loops would not be required to supply power to future substations. With the addition of future substations, the City could add a single set of 12KV loop feeder cables and extend the duct banks from the last PMS to new PMSs to supply power to the future substations.

PROOF
Carollo evaluated options for in-plant distribution of power at the San Leandro WPCP, ultimately recommending a two-loop 12KV system to replace the existing radial system. This is similar to Alternative 2 presented herein, but in this case both 12KV loops were installed at the same time and the existing substations equally divided between the two loops. The approach ultimately saved the City money through avoidance of multiple routings. 52 Future Diesel
Standby Generators
52 52 52 52 52
New Diesel
Standby Generators
New MVS-A
Loop #1 Loop #2
New MVS
-COGEN New MVS-B
MH

PMS PMS
MH
New MVS-Standby
Roseville Electric
Blue Oaks Substation
Future
SWGR-4000
Future
SWGR-5000
52 52
Roseville Electric
Fiddyment Substation
52 52
52 52 52 52 52
84sac0424pf-FIGURES04.ai
Future Cogeneration
52 Future Cogeneration

A B A B A B
52 52
A B
52 52 52

MH MH MH

PMS PMS PMS
SWGR-1000
SWGR-3000
SWGR-2000
New Electrical
Building No. 3
PG88-MTRB-00100-480V
Spare
(Typical)
Spare
(Typical)
Loop #1 Loop #2
LEGEND
Existing
New
Future
| Preliminary one-line diagram for Alternative 2

BENEFIT
A single 12KV feeder loop will reduce
project cost, but also reduces resilience.

BENEFIT
Additional feeder loops can be added for future
substation transformers when required.

Future Diesel
Standby Generators
52 52 52 52 52
New Diesel
Standby Generators
New MVS-A
Loop #1 Loop #1
New MVS
-COGEN New MVS-B
MVS-Standby
Roseville Electric
Blue Oaks Substation
52 Roseville Electric
Fiddyment Substation
52 52 52 52
52 52 52 52 52
Future Cogeneration
52 Existing Microturbines A B
52 52

MH MH MH
SWGR-3000
SWGR-2000
PG88-MTRB-00100-480V
A B SWGR-1000
A B
MH MH

PMS PMS

PMS PMS PMS
Future
SWGR-5000
A B
Future
SWGR-4000
To Future
Substations
Spare
(Typical)
Spare
(Typical)
LEGEND
Existing
New
Future
| Preliminary one-line diagram for Alternative 3

BENEFIT
Future substation installations will only require a
duct bank extension from the last installed PMS.

Balancing redundancy against cost
for in-plant electrical distribution
TAB D: PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
19 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\6-Tab D-ProjUnd

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024
Carollo takes pride in designing facilities that are safe, efficient, easy to operate, and well-planned for future expansion. We will work with your team to review comparable projects, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of differing approaches, so that the City is well-equipped to make design decisions early on.

Designing your facility for safety, efficiency,
ease of O&M, and future expansion.

1. Installation of exhaust silencers and
acoustical silencer assemblies at
the intake and radiator discharge to
reduce generator noise level to dB
ratings established for the project.

2. Ingress/egress designed to meet
operator needs and simplify
movement throughout the building.

3. Urea facilities with proper mixing
systems to maintain the quality
of urea supply, with controls
that are well coordinated with
generator controls.

4. Space for future fuel storage
tanks with common slab and
containment area.

5. Fuel facilities located close to the
building (eliminating the need for
day tank facilities) and close to
the main plant road for easy fuel
delivery (fill stations not shown).

6. A separate fire suppression room
should only be required if there is
not adequate water pressure (and
flow volume) available for tie in
on-site.

7. Building design with ample
space for future standby
generators (including equipment
pads, electrical routing, space
for controls, and installation/
removal access).

8. Separate Control Room with an
operator desk and SCADA screens.

9. A dedicated, well ventilated,
Battery Room to remove risk
of battery off-gas impacting
other rooms.

10. Separate low voltage (MCC Room)
with separate access and clearly
posted arc flash details.

11. Several options for enhanced
arc flash safety, like arc-resistant
gear, arc-flash detection relays,
maintenance mode switches,
flash guard type MCCs, remote
racking capability, and remote
breaker control panels. Preventive
safety features could include I/R
inspection windows, absence/
presence of voltage detectors, and
thermal monitoring.

12. Viewing window between the
SWGR Room and the Control Room
(located outside of arc flash zone)
to facilitate safe visual confirmation
of breakers unracked remotely. A
camera in front of the switchgear
with video feed of the SWGR Room
in the Control Room is another
good option for this.

13. Separate medium voltage (SWGR
Room) with separate access.

Gen 1 Gen 2
Generator Room
Future Generators Fire
Suppression
Room
HVAC and
Mechanical
Room
UREA
Room
HVAC Units
Fuel Tanks
Gen 1
Control
Panel
Gen 2
Control
Panel
84ros0724pf8-FloorPlan.ai
12 KV
Switchgear
Room
Battery
Room
480V
MCC
Room
Control
Room
| An example floor plan for your new Electrical Building No. 3, with several separate rooms (per base scope) and best-in-class design considerations for ancillary facilities.

TAB D: PROJECT UNDERSTANDING

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024 20
B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\6-Tab D-ProjUnd Making sure that your generators will meet
emission requirements when they are
installed (3 years +/- from start of design) is
critical to the operational reliability and future
compliance of your standby power system.

The current minimum emissions requirements
applicable to standby generators of this
size and use in Placer County is Tier 2,
which requires no after treatment for
generator exhaust. However, there are a
few reasons that Tier 4 generators could
be required before this project is fully
constructed permitted:
ƒ The Placer County Air Pollution Control
District (APCD) does not currently have
Tier 4 best available control technology
(BACT) requirements for standby
diesel generators. They currently base
compliance with CARB's Air Toxic Control
Measure to determine acceptability,
but this could change quickly if the
APCD were challenged about how they
determine BACT.
ƒ Tier 4 emission limits could also be
required based on health risk. The health
risk concern would be driven by diesel PM,
the size of the engine, and the nearness of
sensitive receptors (like a school).
ƒ Additionally, Tier 4 generators will likely be
required if the City pursues the inclusion of
storm avoidance and demand peak shaving
capabilities in the generator controls in the
final project (as required by the RFP).

Tier 4 emission abatement requirements
will be very costly to implement (regardless)
but will come with extra expense and
complication if the City doesn't plan for Tier 4
and it is subsequently required.
| Tier 4 standby generators installed at the Draper WTP in Oklahoma City required a ceiling height of 35 feet and a full room working platform for O&M access of the emission treatment equipment.

Planning for anticipated emission treatment
requirements now to save money in the future.

Proactive pursuit of project-specific
emission requirements will help the
City with early design decisions.

Our approach to helping the City navigate this
issue includes:

1. Early discussions with the City to evaluate
goals for storm avoidance and demand
peak shaving against probable Tier 4
requirements and associated costs.

2. If Tier 4 requirements seem likely based
on the findings of the above step, we will
work with the City to approach the APCD
with a request for Health Risk Assessment
(HRA). This will determine whether or
not Tier 4 is required for health reasons
(because of impact to nearby receptors).

3. If ultimately required to meet Tier 4
requirements, we will work with the City to
determine the compliance approach that
best meets the City’s needs (Certified vs.

Compliant – see sidebar).

Tier 4 emission abatement will increase
the cost of new building significantly due
to increased ceiling heights required to
accommodate emission after treatment
systems, costly platforms for O&M access
of taller systems, and dedicated space and
facilities for selective catalytic reduction (SCR)
and urea injection.

If Tier 4 treatment is ultimately required for this
project, we will help the City evaluate options
to possibly reduce project costs (i.e. housing
the generators in separate enclosures versus
dedicated space in the new building).

Tier 4 Compliance Options
The EPA classifies Tier 4 Generators in
two compliance levels, Certified and
Compliant. While both levels meet the Tier
4 requirements, each has advantages and
disadvantages that should be considered:

Certified: A Tier 4 Certified
generator has had the emissions
aftertreatment equipment tested and
pre-approved by the EPA as meeting all
emissions requirements.
ƒ Advantages: No source testing during
startup or afterward.
ƒ Disadvantages: Higher cost,
minimal customization/modifications
available, and associated “Inducement
Shutdowns”, which are a legal
requirement on Certified generators,
occur in the event of a system fault or
failure in the emissions aftertreatment
system, and involve a series of derating
and shutdown steps if not properly
addressed at start of inducement.

Compliant: A Tier 4 Compliant
Generator has similar emissions
aftertreatment equipment as the Tier
4 Certified generator, however the
aftertreatment equipment is fitted
by an aftermarket company (not the
generator manufacturer).
ƒ Advantages: Lower overall
system cost and no Inducement
Shutdown requirements.
ƒ Disadvantages: Additional source
testing requirements at equipment
startup, as well as subsequent periodic
testing required for the life of the
generator. Source testing is typically
required every 3 years for the life of
the generator.

TAB D: PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
21 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\6-Tab D-ProjUnd

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024
Minimizing plant shutdowns is paramount to the
success of this project – this is true for our team as
much as it is for yours.

Our approach highlights the benefits of maintaining
the existing 4MW service as a permanent redundant
power source. Whether feasible (or not) as a
permanent connection to plant’s electrical system,
this service will be useful for temporary power during
construction. Using this as a high-level basis for
construction, we prepared a preliminary sequencing
plan. We will work with your team to solidify details
during design so that operational impacts can be
minimized during construction.

Preliminary Sequencing Plan:

1. Procure new electrical equipment including
switchgear, motor control centers, transformers,
and generators as needed.

2. Construct the new electrical building.

3. Electrical equipment delivery/installation/
testing startup.

4. Transfer of plant loads to the new system once
the new 12KV switchgear, standby generators,
and ancillary building electrical equipment have
been tested and commissioned.
| With this sequencing plan it is possible to transfer all loads except SWGR-3000 and the microturbines.

Future Diesel
Standby Generators
52 52 52 52 52
New Diesel
Standby Generators
52 52 52 52 52
52 52
Existing MVSA
Existing Electrical
Building No. 1
New Electrical
Building No. 3
New MVS-A
Spare
(Typical)
Spare
(Typical)
New MVS-B
New MVS-Standby
Roseville Electric
Blue Oaks Substation
Roseville Electric
Fiddyment Substation
Future
SWGR-4000

A B A B
Future
SWGR-5000
52 52 52 52
SWGR-1000
SWGR-3000A B
SWGR-2000
A B
Existing 1.75MW
Standby Diesel
Generator
Existing 1.75MW
Standby Diesel
Generator Existing Cogens
PG88-MTRB-00100-480V
52 52 52 52 52 52
52 52 52 52
LEGEND
Existing
New
Future
Demolish
STEP 4
STEP 8
STEP 2
STEP 7
STEP 3
STEP 5
STEP 1
STEP 9
STEP 4
Steps for Transferring Loads:
ƒ Step 1: Open 12KV breakers feeding side B of
SWGR-1000 and 2000.
ƒ Step 2: Close tie breakers in SWGR-1000 and
2000 so the entire switchgear is fed from side A.
ƒ Step 3: Disconnect the side B feeder cables for
one transformer from the SWGR-1000 and SWGR2000 double-ended substations. ƒ Step 4: Connect side B of SWGR-1000 and 2000 to
side B of the new 12KV switchgear with new 12KV
feeder cables.
ƒ Step 5: Open side A breakers in existing
12KV switchgear feeding side A of SWGR1000 and 2000.
ƒ Step 6: Close side B breakers in the new 12KV
switchgear to feed side B of SWGR-1000 and 2000
ƒ Step 7: Both SWGR-1000 and 2000 are now
supplied with power from the new 12KV switchgear.

Therefore, side A feeder cables for these
switchgears can be disconnected from the existing
12KV switchgear to the new 12KV switchgear.
ƒ Step 8: Transfer of SWGR-3000 will require
a shutdown since it is a single-ended
substation transformer.
ƒ Step 9: Transfer and reconnection of the
microturbines the new 12KV switchgear will
require the shutdown of that system. Note: a new
interconnection agreement application will be
required for paralleling the microturbines with the
utility and the implementation of closed-transition
operation for the new standby generators.

Minimizing plant
shutdowns with informed
construction sequencing.

Tab E: Project Plan
22 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\7-Tab E-ProjPlan

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024
Tab E: Project Plan
Our approach is simple and straightforward—plan the
work and work the plan. Our commitment to always
keeping the end goal in mind has allowed us to
continually meet or exceed client expectations.

WORK PLAN
The development of the Project Plan is based on work plans successfully implemented elsewhere. Key components for project success include:
ƒ An organized schedule of events, deliverables, and review workshops. ƒ Ongoing collaboration with City staff.
ƒ QA/QC reviews by senior staff not otherwise involved in the project.

This process is well defined and repeatable, enabling ongoing team engagement, key stakeholder feedback, informed design documents, and quality constructed facilities. A schematic that depicts the simplified work plan for the project is presented on the next page. The work plan is supported by the detailed Scope of Work, summarized herein, and a Project Schedule developed for all phases of work through construction.

STAFF ASSIGNED TO EACH TASK
The following core team members will work
on every project task:
ƒ Beverly Hann (Project Manager)
ƒ Chris Heger (QA/QC)
ƒ JD Dorafsha (Design Manager)
ƒ Erik Bahneman (Electrical Lead)
ƒ Marissa Petty (Electrical Support)
ƒ Jeffrey West (Electrical Support)
ƒ Daniel Robinson (I&C Lead)
ƒ Ryan Hook (Civil Lead)
ƒ Jenny Warren (WW Process/Sequencing)
ƒ Brian Ream (Electrician)
ƒ James Doering (Structural Lead)
ƒ Michele Hollenbaugh (Architectural Lead)
ƒ Jason Rozgony (Cost Estimating)
ƒ Chad Green (Building Services)
Subconsultants will provide:
ƒ Fugro USA Land, Inc – Geotechnical
ƒ CTA Engineering & Surveying – Surveying
ƒ Arrow Construction – Potholing
ƒ Ascent Environmental – Environmental/
CEQA Services
ƒ Mizutani Environmental – Emission
Abatement/Permitting
ƒ ERS – Arc Flash Study and
Electrical Testing
ƒ Jensen Hughes – Fire Protection/
Suppression
ƒ Ewing Construction Services –
Constructability Review
A detailed breakdown of staff hours
for each task and sub-task is provided
in the Cost Proposal, which has been
submitted separately.

TAB E: PROJECT PLAN

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024 23
B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\7-Tab E-ProjPlan

PRELIMINARY AND INTERMEDIATE DESIGN CONTRACTOR PROCUREMENT FINAL DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PHASE

WORK EFFORT DELIVERABLES MEETINGS RESULTS
Contractor NTP
Award Recommendation
Addenda
Project Management Plan Contractor RFP*
Construction Administration
Weekly Progress Meetings
Preproposal Meeting Slides
Contractor NTP
Authority to Construct
Contractor GMP
Evaluation of
Alternaitives
Kicko Meeting
• Project Team
• City Sta
Kicko
Meeting
Roseville
Electric
30 Percent Design Review
Workshop
• Project Team
• City Sta
60 Percent Design Review
Workshop
• Project Team
• City Sta
80 Percent Design Review
Workshop
• Project Team
• City Sta
60 Percent Design Submittal
• Drawings
• Specifications
• Cost Estimate
30 Percent Design Submittal
• Drawings
• Specifications
• Cost Estimate
Develop 30 Percent Design
• Drawings
• Specifications
• Cost Estimate Pot Holling
Quality
Management
Quality
Management
Quality
Management
Successful
2 Project Completion
Develop 60 Percent Design
• Drawings
• Specifications
• Cost Estimate
Develop 80 Percent Design
• Drawings
• Specifications
• Cost Estimate
Develop 100 Percent Design
• Drawings
• Specifications
• Cost Estimate
• Contractor GMP
• Construction Schedule
In collaboration with Contractor
and City
Preproposal Meeting
• City Sta
• Contractors
• Carollo Project Manager
Geotechnical
Survey
Notes: 1 ESDC = Engineering Services During Construction. ESDC includes oce engineering for submittal and RFI reviews, preparation of design clarifications, and assistance with change order preparation. 2 Warranty period not shown.

ESDC1
Asset Management Data
On-Site Engineer
Record Drawings
Testing/Commissioning
Permit to Operate
O&M Manuals
ARC Flash Study ,
Labeling and Training
Punchlist
Warranties
Project Closeout
Develop 80 Percent Design
• Drawings
• Specifications
• Cost Estimate
MMRP
Potholing
Admin Draft
IS/MND
Early Decisions
on Key Project
Components
Coordination Meeting
with Fire Department
Design Review with
Roseville Electric
Coordination Meeting
with Fire Department
Design Review with
Roseville Electric
Coordination Meeting
with Fire Department
Response to
Public
Comments
IS/MND
Authority to
Construct
Permit
Application
Permits
Needs TM Updated 80 Percent Design
Documents - Contractor
Procurement Submittal

WORK PLAN
Our delivery plan is enhanced with quality reviews by senior staff, ongoing collaboration with City staff through project completion, and a strong plan for partnership with the City's hired contractor during construction of facility improvements.

TAB E: PROJECT PLAN
24 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\7-Tab E-ProjPlan

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024

SCOPE OF WORK
This Scope of Work is based on the information
presented in the Request for Proposal (RFP), our
understanding of the project as discussed with City
staff, and experience with similar projects.

CONSULTANT will provide comprehensive design,
procurement support, engineering services during
construction (ESDC), and on-site engineering for
design-assist delivery of the Electrical Power System
Capacity Expansion Project (Project), which includes
the following improvements at the Pleasant Grove
Wastewater Treatment Plant (PGWWTP):
ƒ A new 12kV utility feed from Roseville Electric to
replace the existing 4MW feed.
ƒ Two (2) new 12kV standby generators (2.5 MW
each) connected to the 12kV switchgear with
incorporation of design details for:
» Eliminating open-transition switching and load
shedding requirements during power outages.
» Eliminating fault current rating exceedances for
closed-transition switching and back transfer to
Roseville Electric.
» Proper generator emission treatment to meet
Placer County Air Pollution Control District
(APCD) requirements and for storm avoidance
and demand control.
ƒ The switchgear equipment, generator building,
and controls will be designed to accommodate
spare capacity for two future 2.5MW generators.
ƒ A new 12kV switchgear line-up (with customer
metering with communication to SCADA).
ƒ New Electric Building #3 to house the new 12kV
switchgear, the new standby generators, and
spare pads for two (2) future standby generators.

Electrical Building #3 will be designed with the
following improvements (at minimum):
» HVAC/mechanical and storage room.
» Battery room.
» Electrical control room including breaker
switching and racking of medium voltage
breakers for safety/ARC flash protection, PCM
control panel, network cabinet, etc.
» Medium Voltage (12KV) Switchgear room.
» Low voltage (480V) motor control center room.
» Urea room for Tier 4 emissions.
» Fire suppression/protection.
» Sound abatement for the generators.
ƒ Associated duct banks, cable, wiring, and
ancillary items.

The Project also includes the following efforts, as
defined herein:
ƒ Geotechnical, topographic survey, and other field
investigations necessary for the development
of design.
ƒ CEQA/environmental documentation and
permitting support.
ƒ Roseville Electric, Placer County Air
Pollution Control District, and Roseville Fire
Department coordination.
ƒ System testing, including the verification/validation of appropriate operation.
ƒ Preparation of electrical system studies including
Short Circuit, Coordination, and ARC Flash studies,
with ARC-Flash labels for the entirety of the plant.
ƒ Fire protection/suppression design.
ƒ Sound abatement analysis and design.

TASK 1 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT

AND MEETINGS

1.1 – Project Management During Design
CONSULTANT’s Project Manager will maintain
scope, schedule, and budget for the duration of the
Project, develop effective and regular communication
with the City’s Project Manager, work to minimize
change orders and amendments through strong
communication, innovative ideas, and quality and
collaborative team efforts, and streamline the project
timeline with development of effective teaming
relationships with all project stakeholders.

As part of Task 1.1, CONSULTANT’s Project Manager
will prepare written monthly invoice showing the
percentage of work completed and billed, a summary
of the work completed during the month, and a
projection for work to be completed during the
following month. CONSULTANT’s Project Manager
will also maintain decision and action logs throughout
the project to record the decisions made during
technical workshops and project meetings, as
well as project decisions or action items resulting
from telephone conversations or by email. This
task assumes completion of final design within 24
months of receipt of Notice to Proceed. This design
schedule includes approximately 7 months for City
procurement of a contractor partner between 80%
and final design.

TAB E: PROJECT PLAN
25 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\7-Tab E-ProjPlan

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024

1.2 – Project Management Plan
CONSULANT will prepare a project management
plan that covers key design activities. The plan
will define the personnel, project schedule, scope
of services, QA/QC control plan, communication
protocol, and other procedures.

1.3 – Project Kickoff Meeting
CONSULtANT will conduct a Project Kickoff Meeting
to address the overall approach to managing the
project tasks for scope, schedule, and budget, as
well as communication and project team roles/
responsibilities. This meeting will also include a
review of the City's goals and objectives for the
project. CONSULTANT will prepare meeting notes
with accurate recording of project activities, action
items, and decisions.

1.4 – Meetings with Roseville Electric
CONSULTANT will participate in a pre-design
meeting with Roseville Electric and the City’s project
leads, and design review meetings.

1.4.1 – Predesign Meeting with Roseville Electric
CONSULTANT will participate in a pre-design
meeting with Roseville Electric and the City’s
project leads to discuss project objectives, service
conductor and conduit sizing, and design options
and to request feedback about utility-specific
requirements for the new electrical service feed. The
fee associated with this task assumes a 2-hour, inperson meeting attended by up to three (3) members of CONSULTANT’s team.

1.4.2 – Design Coordination Meetings
with Roseville Electric
CONSULTANT will participate in up to two (2) design
coordination meetings with Roseville Electric and
the City’s project leads to coordinate timing and
design details between CONSULTANT’s design of
the WWTP electrical facilities and Roseville Electric’s design of the new electrical service feed. The fee
associated with this task assumes 2-hour, in-person
meetings attended by up to three (3) members of
CONSULTANT’s team.

1.5 – Monthly Progress
Meetings during Design
CONSULTANT will conduct monthly progress
meetings (MS Teams) during the design phase
of the project to maintain effective and regular
communication. At a minimum, the following will be
reviewed at the monthly progress meetings: current
project status, action and decision logs, information
needs, and the project look‑ahead schedule.

TASK 1 MEETINGS
» Project Kickoff Meeting.
» Pre-Design Meeting with Roseville Electric.
» Design Review Meetings with Roseville Electric.
» Monthly Progress Meetings.

TASK 1 DELIVERABLES
» Project Management Plan.
» Agenda and Meeting Minutes for
Kickoff Meeting.
» Agenda and Meeting Minutes for Pre-Design
Meeting with Roseville Electric.
» Agenda and Meeting Minutes for Design Review
Meetings with Roseville Electric.
» Agendas and Minutes from Monthly
Progress Meetings.

TASK 2 – FIELD INVESTIGATIONS

2.1 – Geotechnical Investigation
Under this task, subconsultant Fugro USA Land,
Inc. will conduct a geotechnical investigation and
prepare a project geotechnical report to define
geotechnical conditions as required for construction
of the proposed improvements. This scope assumes
the following:
ƒ Preparation of a site-specific Health and
Safety Plan.
ƒ Review of previously prepared geotechnical
reports for the site.
ƒ Field preparation activities including the
coordination of boring locations and notification of
Underground Service Alert (USA).
ƒ Drilling permit application and fees.
ƒ Field exploration, including drilling up to five (5)
bores using a hollow-stem auger with four (4) up to
depths of 20-30 feet and one (1) to a depth of 50
feet (for determination of liquefaction potential).
ƒ Standard penetration resistance testing.
ƒ Geotechnical laboratory testing of soil samples to
provide soil index properties and assess corrosion
potential of existing soils.
ƒ Analysis and recommendations for earthwork and
foundations for the project
A Draft Geotechnical Report will be prepared
to summarize the methodologies, findings, and
recommendations for City review. Comments
received from the City will be incorporated into a final version of the report.

TAB E: PROJECT PLAN
26 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\7-Tab E-ProjPlan

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024

2.2 – Site Survey
CONSULTANT will manage the efforts of the site
survey subconsultant (CTA Engineering & Surveying)
to perform a field survey of the site using the
appropriate vertical and horizontal plant datum
to produce a topographic mapping for use in the
preparation of design drawings. The survey will be
developed with spot elevations every 50 feet, all
surface features surveyed, and manholes and catch
basin rims and invert elevations measured.

2.3 – Potholing
CONSULTANT will manage the efforts of the
potholing subcontractor (Arrow Construction)
to complete potholing necessary for location of
underground utilities. Early efforts to accurately locate existing facilities can significantly reduce the risk of change orders due to unforeseen conditions. The fee
associated with this task assumes the following:
ƒ Coordination of appropriate USA markings and
removal (as required by the City).
ƒ Five (5) days of field crew efforts to pothole
existing utilities on-site.
ƒ Core drilling of asphalt and/or concrete cap
surfaces at up to ten (10) locations.
ƒ Soil off haul and disposal.
ƒ Imported HMA material for backfilling pothole
cores, and restoration of pothole surface.
ƒ One (1) day of field crew effort for completion of
ground penetrating radar (GPR) survey.

TASK 2 MEETINGS
» Informal, as needed.

TASK 2 DELIVERABLES
» Geotechnical Report (draft and final).
» Topographic mapping file.

TASK 3 – PERMITTING

3.1 – Initial Study/Mitigated
Negative Declaration
CONSULTANT will manage the efforts of our
environmental subconsultant (Ascent Environmental,
Inc.), in collaboration with the City’s environmental
team, to complete the necessary California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) documentation
and associated environmental permitting for the new
Electrical Building No. 3, which will be located within the PGWWTP perimeter, but on undeveloped land.

The fee associated with this task assumes that
an IS/MND will be the appropriate level of CEQA
documentation required for this project, under
which all potential environmental impacts would be
mitigable to less-than-significant levels. This is based on effort completed by Ascent during the PGWWTP
Expansion and Energy Recovery Project, and the
findings and recommendations of the West Roseville
Specific Plan (which covers the Southern Expansion
Area at PGWWTP where the new electrical building
will be located). An amendment to the contract will be
required if additional environmental effort (above the
IS/MDN level) is required.

3.1.1 – Admin Draft IS/MND
This task includes preparation of an Initial Study (IS) in full compliance with CEQA and the State CEQA
Guidelines. We anticipate completing the CEQA
Environmental Checklist with explanations and
analysis for each response, including “No Impact”
responses. The level of analysis and degree of
impact will vary depending upon the environmental
topic but will be sufficient to provide substantial
evidence to support the conclusions, consistent
with CEQA requirements. For each environmental
issue, the IS will describe existing conditions, assess potential environmental impacts, and recommend
feasible mitigation measures, as needed.

All issue areas included in Appendix G of the
State CEQA Guidelines will be addressed, with
emphasis on those issues with the potential for
substantial changes compared to existing conditions,
including air quality, noise, and biological resources.

Construction emissions will be estimated, and noise
will be calculated. This task also includes budget for
a biologist to visit the site to document any sensitive resource conditions.

An Administrative Draft IS/MND will be prepared
for City review along with a draft Notice of Intent
(NOI) to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration
(MND). This task includes up to one (1) meeting with
Ascent to discuss content/findings in the Admin Draft
IS MND.

3.1.2 – IS/MND for Public Review
Comments received on the Administrative Draft IS/
MND and Draft NOI will be incorporated into final
versions of each for public review. The IS/MND will
be circulated for a 30-day public review period and
with the NOI posted in parallel. It is assumed that City staff will distribute the documents and notices.

TAB E: PROJECT PLAN
27 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\7-Tab E-ProjPlan

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024

3.1.3 – Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
This task includes the preparation of draft and final
versions of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program (MMRP). The MMRP will include the
information necessary to determine when a mitigation
measure is complete or whether ongoing mitigation
or monitoring is to be implemented in conformance
with the IS/MND. Such information includes
implementing party, timing, monitoring agent, and
other pertinent measure-specific details.

A draft version of the MMRP will be submitted for City
review, and comments received on the Draft MMRP
will be incorporated into a Final MMRP. This task
includes up to one (1) meeting with Ascent to discuss
content/findings in the draft MMRP.

3.1.4 – Response to IS/MND Comments TM
Upon completion of the public review period for the
IS/MND, a compilation of any comments received
on the public draft IS/MND will be prepared along
with a technical memorandum (TM) responding to
comments that raise environmental issues. Though
written responses to comments are not strictly
required by CEQA for an IS/MND, it is recommended
as a best practice to provide evidence that
comments were public and agency comments were
meaningfully considered by the lead agency prior to
action on the project.

Upon adoption of the MND and approval of the
project, a Notice of Determination (NOD) will be
prepared and filed with the State Clearinghouse and
County Clerk.

3.2 – Permit Needs TM
The City received permits under Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act for fill of wetlands at and adjacent
to the PGWWTP site for construction of the existing
PGWWTP and development under the West Roseville
Specific Plan. In addition, US Fish and Wildlife
Services issued a biological opinion and exempted
incidental take of vernal pool fairy shrimp and vernal
pool tadpole shrimp from development activities
associated with the West Roseville Specific Plan,
which covers the project area. It is assumed that
potential impacts to wetlands and listed species
would be covered by these previous permits and no
further permitting or compensatory mitigation would
be required for the proposed project.

Under this task, we will complete a review of previous
permits and CEQA documents covering development
in the project area to confirm whether any additional
project-specific permitting would be required and
prepare a memo summarizing the recommendations
for permitting based on this updated review. A Draft
Permit TM will be prepared for City review, and any
comments received will be incorporated into a final
version of the document.

3.3 - Air Quality Permitting
CONSULTANT will manage the overall efforts
associated with air quality permitting for the project, including the determination of emissions abatement
needs and the Authority to Construct.

3.3.1 – Determination of Emissions
Abatement Level Required for Project
CONSULTANT will work with the City, our hired air
permitting subconsultant (Mizutani Environmental),
and the Placer County Air Pollution Control District
(APCD) to determine the level of emissions abatement
needed for the project. The budget associated with
this task assumes up to three (3) hybrid meetings
(2 hours each) with the APCD, attended by two (2)
management level CONSULTANT staff (and includes
preparation time for CONSULTANT team and for the
overall CONSULTANT/City project team).

3.3.2 – Authority to Construct
CONSULTANT will manage the preparation of a
permit application for an Authority to Construct
(ATC) from the Placer County Air Pollution Control
District (APCD) for new Electrical Building No. 3 and
associated equipment. This work will include:
» Confirmation that equipment and facility
design parameters comply with regulatory
requirements.
» Compiling and evaluating data and
specifications for the development of emission
estimates for the project (Task 3.3.1).
» Interacting with APCD permitting staff during the
application process prior to the initial submittal
(phone/online).
» Preparing APCD application for ATC.

Deliverables include a draft application packet
for City review and final application packet for
City submittal to APCD.
» Following up with APCD to address any
questions following application submittal.

The budget associated with this task assumes that
the Project will require only one permit application.

TAB E: PROJECT PLAN
28 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\7-Tab E-ProjPlan

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024

3.4 – Fire Department Coordination
A building permit is not required by the City for
this project, but effort is needed to determine fire
suppression requirements for the new building.

CONSULTANT will coordinate with the City and
the Roseville Fire Department to determine fire
suppression requirements for the Project. This
task includes:
ƒ Participation in a Design Initiation Meeting with
the Roseville Fire Department to preview project
scope and collect initial feedback regarding
possible fire suppression requirements.
ƒ Participation in Design Review Meetings with the
Roseville Fire Department at the 30%, 60%, and
80% design level to discuss design details and
collect feedback.
ƒ Associated coordination for design package
submittals, meeting scheduling and preparation,
and preparation of meeting agendas and minutes.

TASK 3 MEETINGS
» Admin Draft IS/MND Review Meeting.
» Draft MMRP Review Meeting.
» Meetings with the Placer County APCD
to discuss air permitting and emission
abatement levels.
» Meetings with Roseville Fire Department.

TASK 3 DELIVERABLES
» Draft Administrative Draft IS/MND and Draft NOI
to Adopt MND.
» Agenda and Meeting Minutes for Admin Draft
IS/MND Review Meeting.
» Public Draft IS/MND.
» Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
(draft and final).
» Agenda and Meeting Minutes for Draft MMRP
Review Meeting.
» Response to IS/MND Comments TM (draft
and final).
» Notice of Determination.
» Permit Needs TM (draft and final).
» Authority to Construct Permit Application (draft
and final).
» Agenda and Meeting Minutes for
APCD meetings.
» Agenda and Meeting Minutes for Roseville Fire
Department meetings.

TASK 4 – EVALUATION

OF ALTERNATIVES
To facilitate key decisions required for efficient
progression of design, CONSULTANT will work with
the City to complete the alternative evaluations
discussed herein.

4.1 – New Electrical Service
Feed Alternatives Analysis
CONSULTANT’s coordination of design details
(meetings) for the new electrical service feed with
Roseville Electric is covered under Task 1.4. This task includes budget hours for documentation of options,
City’s (and/or Roseville Electric’s) selected alternative, and requirements for connected facilities based on
the selected alternative. This analysis will include
comparison of up to four (4) feasible alternatives, with the following as possible options:
ƒ Single 8-10MW service feed routed from substation
at Fiddyment.
ƒ Single 8-10MW service feed routed from substation
at Blue Oaks.
ƒ Underground vs. overhead service feeds.
ƒ Feasibility of maintaining the existing 4 MW service
feed as an secondary power service.
ƒ Other, as deemed potentially feasible by the City
or Roseville Electric.

CONSULTANT will complete an evaluation of feasible
alternatives available for new/upsized electrical
service from Roseville Electric, prepare planning level 5 cost estimates for price comparisons of each, lead
a workshop with the City to discuss draft findings,
and document findings and recommendations in an
Electrical Service Feed Alternatives Analysis TM.

A draft version of the Electrical Service Feed
Alternatives Analysis TM will be submitted for City
review, and comments received on the draft will be
incorporated into a Final Electrical Service Feed
Alternatives Analysis TM.

TAB E: PROJECT PLAN
29 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\7-Tab E-ProjPlan

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024

4.2 – In-Plant Electrical Distribution
Alternatives Analysis
CONSULTANT will work with the City to evaluate
options for in-plant electrical power distribution.

This analysis will include comparison of up to
four (4) feasible alternatives, with the following as
possible options:
ƒ Primary (12KV) radial distribution system
connecting substation transformers directly to the
switchgear busses.
ƒ Primary (12KV) selective distribution system with
multiple12KV loops routed through the plant to
supply power to existing and future substation
transformers via pad-mounted switches (PMS).
ƒ Primary (12KV) selective distribution system with
a single 12KV loop routed through the plant to
supply power to existing and future substation
transformers via PMSs.
ƒ Other, as deemed potentially feasible by the City.

CONSULTANT will complete an evaluation of
alternatives for electrical distribution routing in the plant, prepare planning level l 4 cost estimates for
price comparisons of each, lead a workshop with the
City to discuss draft findings, and document findings
and recommendations in an In-Plant Electrical
Distribution Alternatives Analysis TM.

A draft version of the In-Plant Electrical Distribution Alternatives Analysis TM will be submitted for
City review, and comments received on the draft
will be incorporated into a Final In-Plant Electrical
Distribution Alternatives Analysis TM.

4.3 - Standby Generator Configuration
and Emissions Abatement Options
CONSULTANT will work with the City and our hired
subconsultant (Mizutani Environmental) to evaluate
option for standby configuration and emissions
abatement based on project goals, feedback
from Placer County APCD, experience with similar
projects, and availability of project funds. This
analysis will include comparison of up to four (4)
feasible alternatives, with the following as possible
options:
ƒ Tier 2 generators, if permits are available by APCD.
ƒ Tier 4 generators
» Certified Tier 4 generators – with emissions
aftertreatment equipment tested and preapproved by the EPA. » Compliant Tier 4 generators – with aftertreatment
equipment provided by an aftermarket supplier
(not the generator manufacturer)
ƒ In-building generator installation versus separate
enclosure installation.
ƒ Other, as deemed potentially feasible by the City
or APCD.

CONSULTANT will complete an evaluation of options
for standby generator configuration and emissions
abatement, prepare planning level l 4 cost estimates
for price comparisons of each, lead a workshop with
the City to discuss draft findings, and document
findings and recommendations in a Standby Power
Configuration and Emissions Abatement Options TM.

A draft version of the Standby Power Configuration
and Emissions Abatement Options TM will be
submitted for City review, and comments received
on the draft will be incorporated into a Final Standby
Power Configuration and Emissions Abatement
Options TM.

4.4 – Electrical Building No. 3
Layout Options Workshop
CONSULTANT will conduct a workshop with the City
to discuss various options and for Electrical Building
No. 3 including building sizing/configuration based
on room layout, safety options, sound abatement
options, HVAC layout options, architectural detailing,
ingress/egress and equipment access, building
automation options, fire protection/suppression
options, fuel storage options (with/without day tank),
and control room design (at minimum).

CONSULTANT will explain advantages and
disadvantages of various options with relative cost
comparison (low, medium, high), and collect feedback
for City preference for preliminary design
TASK 4 MEETINGS
» Electrical Building No. 3 Layout
Options Workshop.

TASK 4 DELIVERABLES
» Electrical Service Feed Alternatives Analysis TM
(draft and final).
» In-Plant Electrical Distribution Alternatives
Analysis TM (draft and final).
» Standby Power Configuration and Emissions
Abatement Options TM (draft and final).

TASK 5 – COMPREHENSIVE DESIGN
CONSULTANT will design facilities and equipment
outlined herein in collaboration with the City’s
team, develop design plans and specifications
to be incorporated into the City’s Design-Assist
TAB E: PROJECT PLAN
30 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\7-Tab E-ProjPlan

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024
procurement documents, and develop Contract
Documents for construction based on input from the
City’s project team and the Contractor team chosen
by the City during procurement.

Construction drawings will include applicable
general, architectural, civil, fire protection, structural, mechanical, electrical, instrumentation and control,
fire protection/suppression, and demolition drawings.

All work items, definitions, references, inspections,
testing, repair and replacements will comply
with the latest edition of the American National
Standards Institute/International Electrical Testing
Association (ANSI/NETA). Maintenance Testing
Specifications (MTS).

The City’s Front End Contract Documents
will be used for this project, coordinated with
CONSULTANT’s technical specifications in
collaboration with the City team.

CONSULTANT will prepare construction cost
estimates for each design deliverable, except the 100
Percent Design Documents (which will be estimated
by the City’s Design-Assist Contractor). Estimates
will be based on available quantity take-offs,
manufacturer’s quotes, and experience incorporating
similar project elements at other treatment
facilities and will be escalated to the mid-point of
construction. Project cost estimates will be prepared
to a level of detail consistent with the standards of
AACE International.

The fee associated with the detailed design phase
is based on the number of drawings included in the
Preliminary Drawing List (attached), based on the
following general design assumptions:

5.1 – 30% Design Documents
Consultant will prepare 30% Design Documents
for City review. The 30 percent design will include
drawings, key technical specifications, and an AACE
Class 3 cost estimate.

5.2 – 30% Design Review Workshop
A workshop will be held to review the 30%
Design Documents and receive comments to be
incorporated into the 60% design submittal. This
task assumes hybrid attendance for up to four (4)
CONSULTANT staff attending a four‑hour workshop.

5.3 – 60% Design Documents
Incorporating comments received from the City on
the 30% design review package, and in evolution of
the design consistent with standard industry practice,
CONSULTANT will develop and submit 60% Design
Documents for City review. The 60% design submittal
will include drawings, key technical specifications,
and an AACE Class 2 cost estimate.

5.4 – 60% Design Review Workshop
A workshop will be held to review the 60% design
submittal and receive comments to be incorporated
into the 80% design submittal. This task assumes
hybrid attendance for up to four (4) CONSULTANT
staff attending a four‑hour workshop.

5.5 – 80% Design Documents
Added tasks 5.5.2 and 5.5.3 will facilitate City review and feedback on the final 80% Design Document
submittal prior to release for public Contractor
bidding.

5.5.1 – 80% Design Submittal
Incorporating comments received from the City on
the 60% design review package, and in evolution of
the design consistent with standard industry practice,
CONSULTANT will prepare and submit a draft version
of the 80% Design Documents for City review. The
80% design will include drawings, specifications, and
an updated AACE Class 2 cost estimate.

5.5.2 – 80% Design Submittal Review Workshop
A workshop will be held to review the 80% design
submittal and receive comments to be incorporated
into the final Contractor procurement set. This
task assumes hybrid attendance for up to four (4)
CONSULTANT staff attending a four‑hour workshop.

5.5.3 – Updated 80% Design Documents
- Contractor Procurement Submittal
CONSULTANT will prepare an updated 80% design
submittal to incorporate comments received from
the City team during the 80% Design Submittal
Review Workshop (task 5.5.2). The updated 80%
Design Documents will be used to assist the City
with procurement of a Contractor partner for the
Design-Assist team. The fee associated with this
task assumes that feedback received from the City’s
review will not result in significant design changes.

Quality Assurance/Quality Control
Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) will be
ongoing throughout the design process and will be
discussed at regularly scheduled meetings. As with
all Carollo projects, detailed technical reviews of
each design deliverable will be performed by senior
technical experts that are not otherwise involved in
the project design. This will provide the City with an
expert and objective review.

TAB E: PROJECT PLAN
31 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\7-Tab E-ProjPlan

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024
Constructability Reviews
CONSULTANT will coordinate third-party
constructability reviews of the 30%, 60%, and 80%
Design Documents in parallel with internal QA/QC
reviews. Constructability reviews will be completed
by Dave Ewing Construction Services to identify
construction challenges, validate construction
sequencing plans, and identify options to ease
the overall construction process through proactive
engineered solutions.

TASK 5 MEETINGS
» 30% Design Review Workshop.
» 60% Design Review Workshop.
» 80% Design Review Workshop.

TASK 5 DELIVERABLES
» 30% Design Documents.
» 60% Design Documents.
» 80% Design Documents (City Review Submittal).
» 80% Design Documents (Contractor
Procurement Submittal).
» Agenda and Meeting Minutes for 30%, 60%, and
80% Design Review Workshops.

TASK 6 – PROCUREMENT SERVICES
CONSTULTANT will assist the City during the
procurement process for a Contractor partner,
who will join the City’s Design-Assist team during
completion of design and who will ultimately lead the
construction of the resulting Project.

6.1 – Pre-Proposal Meeting
CONSULTANT will prepare presentation slides
for the pre‑proposal meeting and present at the
meeting. CONSULTANT’s Project Manager will attend
the pre‑proposal conference and assist the City
with describing the project and answering general
questions that do not require technical interpretation.

CONSULTANT’s Project Manager will also attend a
site walk with the bidders to help provide a general
description of the project and highlight information
that is readily available in the 80 Percent Design
Submittal. Bidders will be advised that only written
questions submitted to the City during the bidding
period will be answered via addenda response to all
potential bidders (Task 6.2).

6.2 – Prepare Addenda
CONSULTANT will answer proposing Contractor’s
questions directed to us by the City and prepare
addenda as required. This task assumes up to three
(3) addenda and a forty-five (45) day bidding period.

6.3 – Review Contractor Proposals
CONSULTANT will assist the City’s team with review
of Contractor proposals received from prospective
bidders. The fee associated with this task assumes
that up to two (2) members of CONSULTANT’s
management level team participate in the review
and scoring of up to six (6) Contractor proposals (in
accordance with requirements and scoring criterion
developed by the City), and a review meeting with
the City team for Contractor selection.

6.4 – Contractor Interviews and/
or Contract Negotiations
CONSULTANT will assist the City with Contractor
interviews and/or contract negotiations. The fee
associated with this task assumes that up to two (2)
members of CONSULTANT’s management level team
participate in the following Task 6.4 activities:
ƒ Up to three (3) in-person interviews at the City’s
facilities (assumed to occur on the same day), and
ƒ Up to two (2) hybrid contract negotiation meetings
with the selected Contractor.

TASK 6 MEETINGS
» Pre-Proposal Meeting.
» Prospective Contractor Interviews.
» Contract Review Meetings with
Selected Contractor.

TASK 6 DELIVERABLES
» Pre-Proposal Meeting Presentation.
» Addenda, as required.
» Contractor Proposal Scoring Summary.

TASK 7 – FINAL DESIGN

7.1 – Contractor Design Coordination Workshop
CONSULTANT will host a workshop with the selected
Contractor and the City to review the 80 Percent
Design Documents and coordinate Contractor
and City feedback for the development of the 100
Percent Design Documents. This includes budget
for the participation of up to four (4) CONSULTANT
staff in a four (4) hour in-person workshop (including
preparation and follow-up time).

7.2 – 100% Design Documents
CONSULTANT will develop and submit 100% Design
Documents with the Contractor’s and the City’s
input incorporated. The 100% design will include
the full set of project drawings and all front-end and
technical specifications.

TAB E: PROJECT PLAN
32 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\7-Tab E-ProjPlan

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024
TASK 7 MEETINGS
» Contractor Design Coordination Workshop.

TASK 7 DELIVERABLES
» 100% Design Documents (final).
» Agenda and Meeting Minutes for Contractor
Design Coordination Workshop.

TASK 8 – ENGINEERING SERVICES

DURING CONSTRUCTION
CONSULTANT will provide comprehensive
engineering services during construction (ESDC)
as defined herein. The budget associated with this
task assumes that the City will perform construction
management and inspection, will directly receive
and log submittals and shop drawings from the
Contractor, and will submit them to CONSULTANT in
electronic format for review.

8.1 – Project Management
During Construction
This task includes budget for CONSULTANT’s Project
Management efforts during the construction phase.

During this phase, CONSULTANT will continue to
make staffing assignments, review work progress,
communicate progress to the Owner, and manage
the Project budget, schedule, and invoicing. This task
assumes completion of all services included herein
within 36 months of Contractor’s receipt of Notice to
Proceed (not counting Warranty Period services).

8.2 – Coordination Meetings
During Construction
CONSULTANT will participate in various coordination
meetings, including progress meetings, field
meetings, and regular Project Manager status
meetings throughout completion of construction to
coordinate with Contractor and City on innovative
design solutions in the design assist model. This task
assumes hybrid one‑hour‑long, biweekly meetings
attended by up to three (3) CONSULTANT staff
(on average).

8.3 – Submittal Reviews
CONSULTANT will review Contractor and vendor
equipment and material submittals, equipment
O&M submittals, Contractor sequencing and testing
submittals, vendor training submittals, and other
project submittals as requested by the City’s team.

CONSULTANT will provide detailed, disciplinespecific reviews to confirm compliance with the design intent of the project and the requirements
stipulated in the 100 Percent Design Document.

Written responses to each submittal will be provided
on Carollo’s standard submittal response form,
delivered electronically to the City.

As part of this task, CONSULTANT will prepare a
live list of required spare parts with any adjustments
made during construction.

The budget associated with this task assumes
CONSULTANT’s review of 350 submittals
at six (6) hours per submittal (on average),
including resubmittals.

8.4 – RFI Responses
CONSULTANT will respond to Contractor and client
requests for information (RFIs). This task assumes 150
RFIs at four hours per RFI (on average).

8.5 – Design Changes or Modifications
CONSULTANT will prepare design changes and/or
design modifications (DCMs). This task assumes 24
DCMs at eight hours per DCM (on average).

8.6 – On-Site Field Engineer
CONSULTANT will provide an on-site engineer during
construction to assist the City and the Contractor in
coordinated delivery of the Project and provide the
following on-site support (at minimum):
ƒ Participation in City and/or Contractor provided
safety sessions and regular construction progress
meetings.
ƒ Assistance with as-needed inspection activities.
ƒ Coordination of as-needed/in-field design changes
with the City and the Contractor and prepare
associated documentation.
ƒ Provide support during testing, start-up, and
commissioning activities.
ƒ Assist with manufacturer training for
plant personnel.
ƒ Coordination of data transfer between the
Contractor’s team and the City’s SCADA team
(including the preparation of a data points list for
the SCADA team’s use).

The fee associated with this task assumes fulltime/on-site participation of one (1) engineer for an average of three (3) days per week during active
construction (fee estimate assumes 24 months of
active construction within the overall 36-month
construction period). Engineer’s on-site time will be
applied less regularly (0-1 days per week) during low
construction periods so save budget for more regular
participation (4-5 days per week) during heavy
construction periods.

TAB E: PROJECT PLAN
33 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\7-Tab E-ProjPlan

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024

8.7 – O&M Services
CONSULTANT will prepare an updated Operations
and Maintenance (O&M) Manual to reflect all changes
to the electrical system at the PGWWTP, as impacted
by the Project, and will provide training to summarize
O&M Manual updates to Operations and Maintenance
staff identified by the City’s Project Manager. This
task assumes that the existing O&M Manual is current
with respect to all facility improvements (operational
and construction improvements) and that O&M
Manual chapters are available for electronic editing
(via MS Word or similar) without necessary regulatory
or formatting updates. The budget associated with
this task also assumes that O&M training can be
accomplished within six (6) – four (4) sessions lead by one (1) CONSULTANT staff member.

A Draft O&M Manual update will be submitted to
the City for review in the form of “tracked changes”.

Comments received on the Draft O&M Manual
edits will be incorporated into a final version for the City’s use/files.

8.8 – Asset Management
CONSULTANT will collect the City’s required asset
management data from Contractor and submit
finalized data spreadsheets to the City for input
into Maximo.

8.9 – As-Built Drawings
CONSULTANT will prepare and submit as-built drawings
to the City upon completion of construction. As-Built
Drawings will include above-grade and below-grade
changes from the original design drawings. Changes
reflecting as-installed conditions will be made in
the same level of detail and to the same degree of
drafting quality as the original design drawings. The
budget associated with this task assumes a total of 213 drawings, submittal of a Draft As-Built Drawing set for City review, and completion of a Final As-Built Drawing set that incorporates requested edits provided by the
City in a single markup file.

TASK8 MEETINGS
» Biweekly Coordination Meetings.

TASK 8 DELIVERABLES
» Agenda and Meeting Minutes for Biweekly
Coordination Meetings.
» Submittal review comments.
» Responses to RFIs.
» Project DCMs.
» Updated O&M Manual (draft and final).
» Asset Management Data Sheets.
» As-Built Drawings (draft and final).

TASK 9 – TESTING, VALIDATION,

AND COMMISSIONING
CONSULTANT will coordinate with Contractor,
manufacturers, and the City during the testing,
validation, and commissioning of the new electrical
system and its associated components.

9.1 – Electrical Studies (Short Circuit,
Coordination, and ARC Flash Studies)
CONSULTANT will manage the efforts of our
subconsultant (ERS) for the completion of a Short
Circuit Analysis and ARC Flash Study for the PGWWTP
in compliance with associated requirements from
the National Fire Protection Association (NPFA) 70E
(Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace) and
the National Electric Code (NEC).

This task includes updating City’s latest SKM model
for the plant to include the new facilities associated
with this project. CONSULTANT will prepare a draft
Short Circuit Analysis and ARC Flash Study Report for
City review. Following the City’s review of this report, a Protective Device Coordination and Arc Flash
Mitigation Meeting will be conducted with the City to
evaluate available options for mitigating protective
device mis-coordination and arc flash incidences.

CONSULTANT will incorporate feedback received
from the City during the Protective Device
Coordination and Arc Flash Mitigation Meeting and
the City’s review of the Draft Short Circuit Analysis
and Arc Flash Study Report and prepare a Final Short
Circuit Analysis and ARC Flash Study Report. With
delivery of the final report, CONSULTANT will prepare
arc flash labels/stickers, place them in appropriate
locations, and perform associated staff training.

9.2 – Testing, Validation, and Commissioning
CONSULTANT will attend acceptance testing (factory
and field), review manufacturer test plans and results, review Contractor commissioning plans, and provide
associated feedback.

This task assumes that testing of electrical safety
devices (maintenance mode, breaker trip settings,
safety relays, power monitors, overloads, switchgear/
utility safety relays, remote racking, remote breaker
transitions, etc.) will be completed by the Contractor
hired to complete construction.

This task also assumes that the provision of
start-up test reports, calibration information, and
related calculations will be completed by the
Contractor hired to complete construction, or their
testing subcontractor.

TAB E: PROJECT PLAN
34 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\7-Tab E-ProjPlan

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024
TASK 9 MEETINGS
» Protective Device Coordination and Arc Flash
Mitigation Meeting.
» Arc Flash Training Seminar.

TASK 9 DELIVERABLES
» Short Circuit Analysis and Arc Flash Study
Report (draft and final).
» Arc Flash model files (native .skm file format on
thumb drive).
» Arc flash hazard labels.
» Training seminar materials.
» Certificates of completion of arc flash training.

ASSUMPTIONS
The following project assumptions apply, in addition
to others outlined herein.
ƒ The total Project duration (design through
construction) will be 60 months.
ƒ City’s front-end (Division 0-1) specifications will
be used.
ƒ CONSULTANT’s standard technical specifications
(Divisions 02 through 17) will be used.
ƒ CONSULTANT’s standard CAD software,
templates, and symbols will be used in the
development of the drawings.
ƒ The City will provide a current tagging system for
incorporation into the Contract Documents.
ƒ Electronic (pdf) delivery of all project submittals.
ƒ Design of the electrical power feed facilities
between Roseville Electric and the PGWWTP
entrance will be completed by Roseville Electric
(or other). CONSULTANT can complete these
services with contract amendment if desired by
Roseville Electric and the City.
ƒ The City will provide source water and disposal for
all geotechnical drilling operations.
ƒ Soil in the Project area does contain contaminants.
ƒ Onsite storage of geotechnical drilling spoils,
cuttings/drilling mud, etc.
ƒ Geotechnical borings backfilled with ordinary
Portland cement bentonite grout.
ƒ The CEQA environmental checklist will be
addressed with readily available information from
previous reports without the need for modeling,
field visits, or other technical analyses.
ƒ The new building will not be founded on any deep
foundation systems or ground-improved soils.
ƒ The new building will not be provided with
a basement.
ƒ Routing of conduits will not result in utility
conflicts or require significant modifications to
existing structures.
ƒ Routing of conduits will be by sufficiently buried
and protected duct banks (no shallow duct banks
or elevated conduit racks).
ƒ The City will provide an updated SKM model that
incorporates all existing facilities.

PRELIMINARY DRAWING LIST
A preliminary drawing list is presented here
summarizing the anticipated drawings that will be
included in the design plan sets.

TAB E: PROJECT PLAN

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024 35
B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\7-Tab E-ProjPlan Preliminary Drawing List
GENERAL SHEETS ARCHITECTURAL (continued) ELECTRICAL (continued) INSTRUMENTATION (continued) G-0 COVER SHEET, VICINITY MAP, AND LOCATION MAP A09 ENLARGED AREA PLAN 2 E08 MEDIUM VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR MVS-A ONE-LINE DIAGRAM - 1 N19 FIELD NETWORK - 1 G-1 DRAWING LIST A10 INTERIOR ELEVATON 1 E09 MEDIUM VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR MVS-STANDBY ONE-LINE DIAGRAM - 2 N20 FIELD NETWORK - 2 G-2 SITE PLAN A11 INTERIOR ELEVATON 2 E10 MEDIUM VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR MVS-B ONE-LINE DIAGRAM - 3 N21 FIBER PINOUT DRAWINGS - 1 G-3 DESIGN CRITERIA A12 INTERIOR ELEVATON 3 E11 LOW VOLTAGE MCC ELEVATION N22 FIBER PINOUT DRAWINGS - 2 G-4 GENERAL NOTES, SYMBOLS, AND LEGENDS STRUCTURAL E12 LOW VOLTAGE MCC ONE-LINE DIAGRAM - 1 N23 FIBER PINOUT DRAWINGS - 3 G-5 ABBREVIATIONS S01 OVERALL PLAN E13 PANELBOARD SCHEDULES - 1 N24 FIBER PINOUT DRAWINGS - 4 G-6 GENERAL MECHANICAL NOTES AND SYMBOLS S02 FOUNDATION PARTIAL PLAN 1 E14 PANELBOARD SCHEDULES - 2 N25 CONTROL SCHEMATICS - 1 G-7 GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES - 1 S03 FOUNDATION PARTIAL PLAN 2 E15 ELECTRICAL LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE N26 CONTROL SCHEMATICS - 2 G-8 GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES - 2 S04 FLOOR PARTIAL PLAN 1 E16 ELECTRICAL MANHOLE/HANDHOLE SCHEDULE N27 CONTROL SCHEMATICS - 3 TYPICAL DETAILS S05 FLOOR PARTIAL PLAN 2 E17 ELECTRICAL DISCONNECT SCHEDULE N28 CONTROL SCHEMATICS - 4 TG01 TYPICALS DETAILS GENERAL 1 S06 ROOF FRAMING PARTIAL PLAN 1 E18 POWER AND CONTROL - ELECTRICAL CONTROL ROOM N29 CONTROL SCHEMATICS - 5 TG02 TYPICALS DETAILS GENERAL 2 S07 ROOF FRAMING PARTIAL PLAN 2 E19 POWER AND CONTROL - HVAC & MECHANICAL ROOM N30 CONTROL SCHEMATICS - 6 TA01 TYPICALS DETAILS - ARCHITECTURAL 1 S08 UREA AREA PLAN, SECTIONS, AND DETAILS E20 POWER AND CONTROL - STATION BATTERY ROOM N31 CONTROL SCHEMATICS - 7 TA02 TYPICALS DETAILS - ARCHITECTURAL 2 S09 GENERATOR ROOM PLATFORM PLAN E21 POWER AND CONTROL - SWITCHGEAR ROOM N32 CONTROL SCHEMATICS - 8 TA03 TYPICALS DETAILS - ARCHITECTURAL 3 S10 SECTIONS AND DETAILS 1 E22 POWER AND CONTROL - GENERATOR ROOM LOWER - 1 N33 GENERATOR 1 P&ID TA04 TYPICALS DETAILS - ARCHITECTURAL 4 S11 SECTIONS AND DETAILS 2 E23 POWER AND CONTROL - GENERATOR ROOM LOWER - 2 N34 GENERATOR 1 ANCILLARY P&ID TC01 TYPICALS DETAILS CIVIL 1 S12 SECTIONS AND DETAILS 3 E24 POWER AND CONTROL - GENERATOR ROOM LOWER - 3 N35 GENERATOR 1 ANCILLARY P&ID TC02 TYPICALS DETAILS CIVIL 2 S13 SECTIONS AND DETAILS 4 E25 POWER AND CONTROL - GENERATOR ROOM UPPER - 1 N36 GENERATOR 1 ANCILLARY P&ID TC03 TYPICALS DETAILS CIVIL 3 S14 SECTIONS AND DETAILS 5 E26 POWER AND CONTROL - GENERATOR ROOM UPPER - 2 N37 GENERATOR 2 P&ID TC04 TYPICALS DETAILS CIVIL 4 S15 SECTIONS AND DETAILS 6 E27 POWER AND CONTROL - GENERATOR ROOM UPPER - 3 N38 GENERATOR 2 ANCILLARY P&ID TS01 TYPICAL DETAILS STRUCTURAL 1 S16 DIESEL FUEL TANK PLAN AND SECTIONS E28 POWER AND CONTROL - UREA TANK ROOM N39 GENERATOR 2 ANCILLARY P&ID TS02 TYPICAL DETAILS STRUCTURAL 2 MECHANICAL E29 POWER AND CONTROL - ROOF - 1 N40 GENERATOR 2 ANCILLARY P&ID TS03 TYPICAL DETAILS STRUCTURAL 3 M01 OVERALL PLAN E30 POWER AND CONTROL - ROOF - 2 N41 MV SWITCHGEAR P&ID TS04 TYPICAL DETAILS STRUCTURAL 4 M02 LOWER PARTIAL PLAN 1 E31 LIGHTING, RECEPTACLES, & GROUNDING - HVAC & MECHANICAL ROOM N42 PCM P&ID TS05 TYPICAL DETAILS STRUCTURAL 5 M03 LOWER PARTIAL PLAN 2 E32 ELECTRICAL BUILDING NO. 3 LIGHTING, RECEPTACLES, & GROUNDING - 1 N43 MISC. EQUIPMENT P&ID TS06 TYPICAL DETAILS STRUCTURAL 6 M04 UPPER PARTIAL PLAN 1 E33 ELECTRICAL BUILDING NO. 3 LIGHTING, RECEPTACLES, & GROUNDING - 2 N44 MISC. EQUIPMENT P&ID TH01 TYPICALS DETAILS HVAC 1 M05 LOWER PARTIAL PLAN 2 E34 ELECTRICAL BUILDING NO. 3 LIGHTING, RECEPTACLES, & GROUNDING - 3 N45 MISC. EQUIPMENT P&ID TH02 TYPICALS DETAILS HVAC 2 M06 GENERATOR ROOM SECTIONS AND DETAILS - 1 E35 ELECTRICAL BUILDING NO. 3 LIGHTING, RECEPTACLES, & GROUNDING - 4 TH03 TYPICALS DETAILS HVAC 3 M07 GENERATOR ROOM SECTIONS AND DETAILS - 2 E36 ELECTRICAL BUILDING NO. 3 LIGHTING, RECEPTACLES, & GROUNDING - 5 TP01 TYPICALS DETAILS PIPING/MECHANICAL 1 M08 GENERATOR ROOM SECTIONS AND DETAILS - 3 E37 ELECTRICAL BUILDING NO. 3 LIGHTING, RECEPTACLES, & GROUNDING - 6 TP02 TYPICALS DETAILS PIPING/MECHANICAL 2 M09 GENERATOR ROOM AFTERTREATMENT SECTIONS AND DETAILS E38 COMMUNICATION, SECURITY, FIRE DETECTION - 1 TP03 TYPICALS DETAILS PIPING/MECHANICAL 3 M10 GENERATOR ROOM FUEL SYSTEM SCHEMATIC E39 COMMUNICATION, SECURITY, FIRE DETECTION - 2 TE01 TYPICALS DETAILS ELECTRICAL - 1 M11 GENERATOR ROOM FUEL SYSTEM PLAN AND SECTIONS E40 COMMUNICATION, SECURITY, FIRE DETECTION - 3 TE02 TYPICALS DETAILS ELECTRICAL - 2 M12 GENERATOR ROOM DIESEL EXHAUST FLUID SYSTEM SCHEMATIC E41 ELECTRICAL SECTIONS - 1 TE03 TYPICALS DETAILS ELECTRICAL - 3 M13 GENERATOR ROOM DIESEL EXHAUST FLUID SYSTEM PLAN AND SECTIONS E42 ELECTRICAL SECTIONS - 2 TE04 TYPICALS DETAILS ELECTRICAL - 4 M14 PLUMBING PLAN E43 ELECTRICAL SECTIONS - 3 TE05 TYPICALS DETAILS ELECTRICAL - 5 FIRE PROTECTION E44 ELECTRICAL SECTIONS - 4 TE06 TYPICALS DETAILS ELECTRICAL - 6 F01 FIRE PROTECTION PLAN E45 POWER AND CONTROL / FUEL TANKS TE07 TYPICALS DETAILS ELECTRICAL - 7 F02 FIRE PROTECTION SECTIONS AND DETAILS E46 LIGHTING, RECEPTACLES, & GROUNDING / FUEL TANKS TN01 TYPICALS DETAILS INSTRUMENTATION - 1 F03 FIRE PROTECTION SECTIONS AND DETAILS E47 POWER & CONTROL / PMS - 1000 TN02 TYPICALS DETAILS INSTRUMENTATION - 2 HVAC E48 POWER & CONTROL / PMS - 2000 TN03 TYPICALS DETAILS INSTRUMENTATION - 3 GH01 HVAC GENERAL SHEET E49 DEMOLITION - EXISTING 12KV ELECTRICAL BUILDING / SWITCHGEAR ONE-LINE DEMOLITION GH02 HVAC SCHEDULES E50 DEMOLITION - EXISTING 12KV ELECTRICAL BUILDING / SWITCHGEAR ROOM D01 GENERAL DEMOLITION SITE PLAN H01 OVERALL PLAN E51 DEMOLITION - EXISTING 12KV ELECTRICAL BUILDING / GENERATOR ROOM D02 GENERAL DEMOLITION SITE AREA PLAN - 1 H02 GENERATOR ROOM PLAN E52 DEMOLITION - EXISTING 12KV ELECTRICAL BUILDING / EXISTING FUEL TANK D03 GENERAL DEMOLITION SITE AREA PLAN - 2 H03 CONTROL ROOM PLAN E53 DEMOLITION - EXISTING 12KV ELECTRICAL BUILDING / DETAIL - 1 D05 GENERAL DEMOLITION SECTIONS AND DETAILS - 1 H04 BATTERY ROOM PLAN E54 DEMOLITION - EXISTING 12KV ELECTRICAL BUILDING / DETAIL - 2 D06 GENERAL DEMOLITION SECTIONS AND DETAILS - 2 H05 UREA ROOM PLAN E55 DEMOLITION - EXISTING 12KV ELECTRICAL BUILDING / DETAIL - 3 CIVIL H06 HVAC AND MECHANICAL ROOM INSTRUMENTATION
C01 CIVIL SITE PLAN AND SURVEY NOTES H07 AIRFLOW SCHEMATIC N01 SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS - 1 C02 OVERALL GRADING PLAN ELECTRICAL N02 SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS - 2 C03 ENLARGED GRADING AND SITE PLAN EG01 LEGEND & SYMBOLS N03 SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS - 3 C04 YARD PIPING PLAN 1 EG02 ABBREVIATIONS N04 SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS - 4 C05 YARD PIPING PROFILES 1 EG03 TITLE 24 COMPLIANCE N05 SCHEMATIC SYMBOLS C06 CIVIL SECTIONS EP01 ELECTRICAL OVERALL SITE PLAN N06 SAMPLE LOOP DRAWING C07 CIVIL DETAILS EP02 PARTIAL ELECTRICAL PLAN - 1 N07 DIGITAL NETWORK TABLE - 1 C08 FIRE LINE PLAN AND PROFILE EP03 PARTIAL ELECTRICAL PLAN - 2 N08 DIGITAL NETWORK TABLE - 2 ARCHITECTURAL EP04 PARTIAL ELECTRICAL PLAN - 3 N09 DIGITAL NETWORK TABLE - 3 GA01 BUILDING CODE ANALYSIS AND SCHEDULES EP05 PARTIAL ELECTRICAL PLAN - 4 N10 PANEL ELEVATION/WIRING - PLC AND INSTRUMENT POWER A01 OVERALL PLAN EP06 PARTIAL ELECTRICAL PLAN - 5 N11 PCM PANEL ELEVATION INTERNAL A02 FLOOR PARTIAL PLAN 1 E01 DUCTBANK SECTIONS N12 PCM PANEL ELEVATION EXTERNAL A03 FLOOR PARTIAL PLAN 2 E02 DUCTBANK SECTIONS N13 NETWORK RACK ELEVATION - 1 A04 ROOF PARTIAL PLAN 1 E03 DUCTBANK SECTIONS N14 NETWORK RACK ELEVATION - 2 A05 ROOF PARTIAL PLAN 2 E04 DUCTBANK SECTIONS N15 PCS SITE PLAN A06 NORTH AND EAST ELEVATIONS E05 OVERALL ONE-LINE DIAGRAM - 1 N16 SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE DIAGRAM A07 SOUTH AND WEST ELEVATIONS E06 OVERALL ONE-LINE DIAGRAM - 2 N17 OVERALL NETWORK TOPOLOGY DIAGRAM A08 ENLARGED AREA PLAN 1 E07 MEDIUM VOLTAGE SWGR ELEVATION N18 FIBER DISTRIBUTION TAB E: PROJECT PLAN

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024 36
B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\7-Tab E-ProjPlan

PRELIMINARY SCHEDULE
We have developed a preliminary
project schedule based on our
understanding of the RFP and
the proposed scope of services
included in our proposal. This
schedule illustrates the major tasks,
task durations, major milestones,
key meetings, and deliverables.

We will refine the project schedule
based on input received from the
City throughout the project, and use
this schedule as an ongoing tool to
help facilitate timely decisions and
completion of the project.
2024 2025 2026 2029
Task OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN NOV

NOTICE TO PROCEED

1.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND MEETINGS

1.1 Project Management During Design

1.2 Project Management Plan

1.3 Kicko Meeting

1.4.1 Predesign Meeting with Roseville Electric

1.4.2 Design Coordination Meetings with Roseville Electric

1.5 Monthly Progress Meetings

2.0 FIELD INVESTIGATIONS

2.1 Geotechnical Investigation
Draft Report
City Review
Final Report

2.2 Site Survey

2.3 Potholing

3.0 PERMITTING

3.1 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration

3.1.1 Admin Draft IS/MND
City Review

3.1.2 IS/MND for Public Review
Public Review Period

3.1.3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

3.1.4 Response to IS/MND Comments TM

3.2 Permit Needs TM

3.3 Air Quality Permitting

3.3.1 Determination of Emissions Abatement Level Required for Project

3.3.2 Authority to Construct
Fire Department Coordination

4.0 EVALUATION OF DESIGN ALTERNATIVES

4.1 New Electrical Service Feed Alternatives

4.2 In-Plant Electrical Distribution Alternatives

4.3 Standby Generator Confi guration and Emissions Abatement Options

4.4 Electrical Building No. 3 Layout Options

5.0 COMPREHENSIVE DESIGN

5.1 30% Design Documents
City Review

5.2 30% Design Review Workshop

5.3 60% Design Documents
City Review

5.4 60% Design Review Workshop

5.5 80% Design Documents

5.5.1 Draft 80% Design Submittal
City Review

5.5.2 80% Design Submittal Review Workshop

5.5.3 Updated 80% Design Documents - Contractor Procurement Submittal

5.6 Constructibility Reviews

6.0 PROCUREMENT SERVICES

6.1 Pre-Proposal Meeting

6.2 Prepare Addenda

6.3 Review of Contractor Proposals

6.4 Contractor Interviews and/or Contract Negotiations
City Execution of Contractor Contract

7.0 FINAL DESIGN

7.1 Contractor Design Coordination Workshop

7.2 Prepare 100% Design Documents

8.0 ENGINEERING SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION

9.0 TESTING, VALIDATION, AND COMMISSIONING
10/15
84ros0724pf4-Schedule
Finish in
November
2029
Summary
Task
Public Review
City Review
Constructibility Review
Deliverables
LEGEND
Workshop/Meeting
Tab F: Cost Proposal
B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\8-Tab F-CostProp

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024
Tab F: Cost Proposal
Submitted separately.

Tab G: Required
Statements/Documents
37 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\9-Tab G-ReqStmtsDocs

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024
Tab G: Required
Statements/Documents

STATEMENTS OF ASSURANCE
Team Member Non-Substitution
Designated project team members will be used for the duration of the project. Carollo will not substitute any of these team members without prior written approval from the City.

Conflict of Interest
Carollo is familiar with applicable conflict of interest laws and requirements. Neither our firm nor any of its employees involved with this project are aware of any conflict of interest that would preclude working on this project. Carollo, at all times, conducts its professional and business activities in a manner to prohibit conflict of interest on the part of the firm and its employees. We foresee no circumstances in which a conflict could arise.

Indemnification and Insurance Requirements
Indemnification
Carollo agrees with the City of Roseville’s
indemnification requirements as set forth
in the Sample Contract.

Insurance
Carollo maintains insurance to protect both
our client and our firm against the types of
claims that may be alleged to result from
our services on this project. Our current
insurance coverage meets the minimum
required by the City’s Sample Contract.

Proprietary Statement
Carollo Engineers does not consider any of the information contained in this proposal to be proprietary. This proposal does not contain copyrighted material, trade secrets, or other proprietary information claimed as exempt from disclosure under the Public Records Act.

REQUIRED DOCUMENTS
As requested in the RFP, the documents below are provided on the following pages. ƒ Proof of registration with California Secretary of State (Att A) ƒ Proposer’s Certification (Att B)
ƒ Non-collusion Declaration (Att C)
ƒ Sample Contract (Att D)
ƒ Subcontractor List (Att E) - N/A
ƒ Levine Act Disclosure Statement Form (Att G)
Tab H: Exceptions
38 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\10-Tab H-Exceptions

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024
Tab H: Exceptions
After careful review of the RFP documents and
requirements, scope of work, and the City’s sample
contract, Carollo Engineers has no exceptions,
alterations, or amendments to the documents.

Tab I: Competency
of Proposers
39 B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Indd\11-Tab I-CompOfProposers

CITY OF ROSEVILLE / PLEASANT GROVE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT DESIGN SERVICES CAROLLO / PROPOSAL / JULY 2024
Tab I:

Competency
of Proposers
Carollo has never been the subject of
bankruptcy, lien, stop payment notice and/or
foreclosure. Additionally, Carollo has not had a client terminate a contract for breach.

Carollo has been involved in the following filed and/or resolved lawsuits, arbitrations, and/ or mediations in the past seven years.
ƒ In 2017, Carollo was brought into
a lawsuit between a client and the
construction contractor claiming project
delays related to the construction of a
new wastewater treatment plant. The
matter went to trial and Carollo was
subsequently found to have no liability
for any of the claims.
ƒ In 2018, Carollo, the construction
contractor, and a client were the subject
of a lawsuit filed by property owners
along a sewer interceptor realignment
project where construction operations
extended beyond the originally
projected construction completion date.

The matter was submitted to mediation
and thereafter settled with no admission
of fault by Carollo.
ƒ In 2019, Carollo and several other large
water engineering firms doing business
in Florida were sued by a private citizen
who has a history of suing governmental
entities (i.e., his most recent lawsuit
was against the Federal Reserve). The
overall allegations of the citizen center
around claims that Carollo was working
with the other noted water firms to hide
an alleged underground water source
on the plaintiff's/citizen's property from
our Florida clients. The lawsuit was
subsequently dismissed.
ƒ In 2020, Carollo and their joint venture
partner were the subject of a lawsuit
filed by a client related to tank corrosion
as part of a design-build project
completed in 2005. Carollo denies
responsibility for any of the claims. The
matter was submitted to mediation and
thereafter settled with no admission of
fault by Carollo.
ƒ In 2021, Carollo was the subject of a
lawsuit filed by a client related to the
replacement of trickling filter media as
part of a wastewater treatment plant
rehabilitation project. The complaint
alleges professional negligence, breach
of contract and breach of express and
implied warranty. Carollo denies all the
allegations. The lawsuit is in progress.
ƒ In 2021, Carollo and the construction
contractor were the subject of a lawsuit
filed on behalf of a client via subrogation
by their insurance carrier related to
ozone equipment installed as part of
a new surface water treatment plant
project. The complaint alleges breach
of contract and negligence. The lawsuit
was dismissed, without prejudice.

Appendix
B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Resumes\Final Education
MS Environmental
Engineering, University of
California, Davis, 2005
BS Civil Engineering,
California State
University, Chico, 2003
Licenses
Civil Engineer, California
Certification
Project Management
Professional, Project
Management Institute,
California, 4/8/2017
Competent Person
Training, Safety Center
Incorporated, California,
4/19/2007
CPR/First Aid, Safety
Center Incorporated,
California, 4/17/2007
10-Hour Construction
Safety and Health,
Occupational Safety and
Health Administration,
California, 6/1/2007
Professional
Affiliations
California Water
Environment Association
California Association of
Sanitation Agencies
Regulatory Group
(formerly Tri-TAC) Water
Committee
Water Environment
Federation
California League of
Food Processors
Manufacturer’s Council of
the Central Valley
Beverly J. Hann, PE, PMP
Beverly Hann, a vice president with Carollo Engineers, has experience in permitting, design, and construction of water and wastewater treatment facilities. She has completed a diverse list of projects – everything from headworks for municipal wastewater treatment plants to industrial water recycling facilities. This experience has allowed her to focus on project delivery and client service as her main career goals – she knows how to best leverage technical expertise within the company to get projects done right.

Relevant Experience
 Project manager for the City of Roseville,
California, Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment
Plant Biofilter Evaluation. The project included analysis of the foul odor collection and treatment systems currently in place for
the WWTP’s screening, grit, and primary
clarification areas to identify issues and develop options for upgrade and/or replacement. This effort included the development of lifecycle and capital costs (for comparison
of options), staff coordination to review advantages/disadvantages of the various options, and preparation of a final report summarizing efforts and findings of the analysis.  Project Manager for the City of Roseville
Potable Reuse Regulatory Support team
supporting the City’s Pure Water Roseville
program. In line with the City’s Water Future Initiative, the goal of this program is to strengthen the City’s water supply portfolio
through application of non-RO based indirect potable reuse.  Principal-in-charge for the City of Roseville, Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) Well and Pump Station design. The project
involves design, permitting, and construction of six new ASR wells injecting treated water from Folsom Lake. The goal of the
project is to provide water supply resiliency
during times of drought when the Folsom
Lake supply may not provide the desired reliability.
 Project manager for the City of Roseville,
California, Tertiary Filter Replacement. The
project includes an assessment of options
for replacing the continuous backwash filter
units at the City’s Pleasant Grove
Wastewater Treatment Plant and predesign
of the selected replacement project.
 Principle-in-charge for the City of Roseville, California, Barton Road Water Treatment Plant Condition Assessment. The project involves conducting visual assessments of treatment plant assets (Phase 1) followed
by more detailed, invasive inspection of facilities. Assessment results will be incorporated into an asset management framework to prioritize rehabilitation and replacement
needs. The project also includes integrating
the asset management results with the City’s
Maximo® maintenance management system.
 Commissioning Plan development manager for the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District, California, EchoWater
Project Tertiary Treatment Facilities Project
Commissioning Plan. The project involved
development of a detailed plan for commissioning new facilities during design of the new tertiary treatment facilities at the Sacramento Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant, including dry equipment testing (mechanical, electrical, and control system function), wet system testing (development of individual test plans and strategic water
supply/discharge option for each system
within the overall project, including the 343-
mgd filter influent pump station, granular
media filters, waste filter backwash system,
disinfection contact basins, effluent observation structure, chemicals storage and feed systems, and miscellaneous pumping stations), and full facility testing (which required complex cutover strategies as new systems
were integrated with existing systems).
 Project manager for the City of Martinez,
California, 2014 Electrical Power Distribution
Upgrades. Responsible for interfacing with
City staff, water treatment plant personnel,
and design team to confirm the design
meets the City’s needs; tracking budget and
Beverly J. Hann, PE, PMP
B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Resumes\Final Awards
Feather River Branch
Professional Award,
American Society of Civil
Engineers, 2003.

Civil Engineering Alumni
Recognition Award,
California State
University, Chico, 2003
schedule throughout the effort; and coordinating scoping and design review meetings.

Preliminary and final design included replacement of major electrical distribution equipment (PG&E main service transformer,
main switchboard, four in-plant motor control centers, 100 kVA transformer) and associated feeder conductors and conduit. The project also involved complex sequencing
to reduce facility downtime and ongoing
City, PG&E, and contractor coordination.
 Principal-in-charge for the City of Martinez, California, Webster Drive Pump Station Improvements. The project involved predesign, design, and bid-phase services
for replacement of the Webster Drive Pump
Station for distribution of potable water to
upstream customers. Work included replacement of hydropneumatic tanks and pumps, associated piping to and from the
service main, electrical and control facilities,
and pump station housing, as well as addition of a standby generator. Efforts also included preliminary design activities (surveying and geotechnical), coordination with the City’s hydraulic modeler, air quality permit
assistance, and design of a portable trailer
pump skid for use in bypass pumping during facility shutdown for construction (and for future City use with existing City-Contra
Costa Water District interties).
 Project manager for engineering services during construction and construction management assistance for the City of
Martinez, California, 2014 Electrical Power
Distribution System Upgrades. Duties included interfacing with City staff, water treatment plant personnel, onsite contractor, PG&E, and design team members to support the City’s construction manager
during construction of project facilities. The
project scope included submittal reviews,
responses to requests for information, preparation and review of design clarifications and change orders, regular and specialty inspection, and attendance at biweekly construction progress meeting.  Project manager for the South Tahoe
Public Utility District, California, Pressure Reducing Valve (PRV) Upgrades. The project involved identification of feasible water system efficiency upgrades (through collection/use of flow and pressure data) at 19 of the 25 existing PRV stations located
throughout the District’s service area. Improvements for the first PRV upgrade site (Pine Valley) included new PRV and piping
(due to condition) in the existing vault, pressure transmitters upstream and downstream of the existing PRV, valve controller (with
position indicator) for flow monitoring, hydroelectric generator and associated electronics as the sole means of power supply, cellular modem, above-grade control panel,
and temporary bypass pumping during
construction.
 Principal-in-charge for the City of Chico,
California, Thickened Sludge Pump Station
Improvements. This project involved demolition of the pump station building structure (with facilities still in use), miscellaneous piping, electrical, and control system improvements, and design and construction of an open-walled structurally integrated shade
structure with pump removal hoists. All systems previously supported on pump station walls and ceilings were relocated to the new
superstructure ceiling and/or independent
control stands.
 Project manager for the American Valley
Community Services District, California,
Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements.

The project includes headworks upgrades,
secondary treatment system upgrades (nitrification-denitrification), new effluent pipeline to an existing outfall, ancillary pumping stations, solids digestion and dewatering facilities, new electrical service and backup power provisions, new motor control centers, and SCADA improvements to accommodate new facilities.  Principal-in-charge for the El Dorado Irrigation District, California, Folsom Lake Intake Improvements Construction Management and Inspection Services. The project involves rehabilitation of aging pump station infrastructure and electrical systems on Folsom Lake. Responsible for contract implementation and coordination with the engineering team to provide the District asneeded support. \\IO-BD-1\BDEducation
BS Electrical Engineering,
San Francisco State
University, 1992
Licenses
Electrical Engineer,
Oregon, California
Professional
Affiliations
Institute of Electrical and
Electronics Engineers
International Society of
Automation
Jamshid (JD) Dorafsha, PE
Jamshid (JD) Dorafsha is an associate vice president and the electrical & instrumentation design manager with Carollo. JD brings 30 years of experience in designing, managing, and providing electrical and instrumentation engineering services for municipal, institutional, and government projects. He has managed and designed a number of switchgear and substation replacement projects, as well as provided electrical improvements to water and wastewater clients throughout his career.

Relevant Experience
 Project manager for the City of Roseville,
California, Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment
Plant MCC and Switchgear Replacements
Design-Build project. The project includes
replacement of five motor control centers
and one switchgear at the City's Dry Creek
Wastewater Treatment Plant. Carollo is
providing design and engineering services
during construction to the lead designbuilder, Auburn Constructors.  Electrical engineer for the City of Roseville, California, $20 million Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant Phase I Expansion, which added new medium- and highvoltage equipment for power distribution to new process areas. The expansion included
design of a UV disinfection system, fine
screens, primary clarifier, and oxidation
ditches, as well as evaluation of two existing
1,500kW standby generators.
 Project manager for the City of Roseville,
California, Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment
Plant Short Circuit Coordination and Arc
Flash Mitigation Studies. Responsible for site
inspections, evaluation of safety hazards,
and identification of electrical components
presenting potential short circuit and arc
flash risks. Work included evaluation and
mitigation of arc flash hazard levels for electrical equipment throughout the plant using SKM PowerTools® analysis software. The
evaluation included consideration for
changing existing protective device settings,
potential hardware changes, equipmentspecific mitigation measures, and preparation of a plantwide mitigation implementation plan to lower arc flash hazard risk levels.

Carollo also reviewed Roseville’s compliance
with the applicable NEC, NFPA-TOE, IEEE
1584A, and OSHA arc flash standards.
 Electrical engineer for the City of Roseville, California, Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant Short Circuit, Coordination,
and Arc Flash Studies. The project involved
review of a short circuit, coordination, and
arc flash studies using SKM PowerTools® for
the electrical distribution system. The electrical system consists of two double-ended 12kV, 480V unit substations with two
1,500kW standby diesel generators connected to the 480V switchgears in a maintie-tie-main arrangement.  Electrical engineer for the City of Roseville, California, Bioassay and Reclaimed Water Pump Station Upgrade at the Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant. Responsible
for design of the electrical, instrumentation,
and PLC system. The project included detailed design and layout of an Ethernet network connection of two new PLCs to an existing plant SCADA system using fiber optics as communication media.
 Electrical engineer for the City of Roseville, California, Reclaimed Water Pump Station and Reservoir. Responsible for design of the electrical, instrumentation, and PLC
system. The project included design and
layout of PLC cabinet and radio communication system to the existing plant SCADA system. The pump station and reservoir
served to mitigate the flow of water between the City’s south pressure zone, Dry Creek and Pleasant Grove Wastewater
Treatment Plants, and north pressure zone.
 Electrical engineer for the Sacramento
Regional County Sanitation District, California, EchoWater Project Flow Equalization Project (FEQ). The $130-million FEQ will provide 110 MG of additional storage capacity and includes roller-compacted concrete
lined basins, spillways and interconnections
structures, 84-inch final effluent distribution
pipeline, underdrain pump station, and basin washdown system with manual and automated water cannons for washdown of over 60 acres of basin area.

Jamshid (JD) Dorafsha, PE
\\IO-BD-1\BD-
 Electrical engineer for the Sacramento
Regional County Sanitation District, California, EchoWater Project Nitrifying Sidestream Treatment Project (NST). This $50 million
project will use nitrifying sequencing batch
reactors to reduce ammonia in the solids
treatment system supernatant necessary to
meet interim permit conditions. It will also
produce nitrate-rich effluent for odor control. NST includes influent and effluent pumping and lime addition.  Project engineer for the Clean Water Services, Oregon, PPS-1 Odor Control System Relocation, which included an evaluation of the power distribution system as part of the Electrical Master Plan. The project involved replacement of 15kV switchgear PPS -
I, 15kV switchgear 1 OOSWGR-IA/1B, and
480V switchboard SWBD-4, as well as relocation of transformers TU-3 and TU-4, ductbank construction, and demolition of existing electrical gear.  Electrical distribution and control design for medium voltage (MV), 5kV, 900-hp motors for complete rehabilitation and upgrade of the East Bay Municipal Utility District's new No. 2 Pump Station in Danville, California. Design included demolition of
existing MV switches and gears and rerouting of PG&E's 21kV power source for feeding the new pump station. Also designed the security system for the pump station
and generator building.  Electrical design lead for preliminary design of the City of Oak Harbor, Washington, Wastewater Treatment Plant. Participated in
a preliminary design CAMP
® and prepared
30% electrical, instrumentation, and control
drawings for the preliminary treatment system, aeration/equalization basin, membrane system, UV disinfection/effluent equalization, solids handling, chemical system, odor control, administration building, electrical
building, and standby generator for the
Dawson Creek Pump Station.  Electrical engineer for the City of Livermore, California, Fuel Cell Cogeneration and 1500kW Standby Generator. The project involved an assessment of the existing electrical distribution system and equipment, including a plant-wide short circuit analysis using SKM PowerTools
®. As a result of this
study, Carollo prepared drawings and procurement specifications to replace the existing single-ended 480V substation with a 21kV, 480V unit substation transformer and
double-ended main-tie-tie-main 480V
switchgear. Carollo then connected the fuel
cell cogeneration units to the plant's electrical system.  Electrical engineer for design of the electrical distribution system for four new water pump stations for the South San Joaquin Irrigation District, California. Two pump stations were for the City of Manteca, one for the City of Lathrop, and one for the City of
Tracy. Design included adjustable frequency
drive motors with a range between 150 hp
for Manteca and 400 hp for Tracy. Tracy's
electrical system also included a permanent
standby generator with an automatic transfer switch.  Project engineer for the City of Martinez, California, Electrical Power Distribution Upgrades. The project included replacement of the PG&E main service transformer, plant
switchgear, four motor control centers, and
associated lower voltage site transformers,
as well as connection of feeder conductors
and conduit for all replaced electrical components and downstream connected loads.

The project also involved implementation of
a load-shedding scheme for the facility;
complex sequencing and ongoing coordination with the City, PG&E, and the contractor to reduce facility downtime during service transformer replacement; and continued coordination with the City's system integration team.  Electrical engineer for the West County Wastewater District, California, Electrical Replacement. Designed the replacement and relocation of an existing 480V switchgear
lineup serving the majority of the plant’s
motor control centers. Developed a detailed
construction sequencing plan designed to
minimize the disruption to plant operations,
and contributed to a plan for replacing the
majority of the plant’s motor control centers.

B/Resumes/DNL/HegerChristopher.docx
Education
MS Electrical Engineering,
Colorado School of
Mines, 2012
BS Electrical Engineering,
Colorado School of
Mines, 2008
Licenses
Professional Engineer,
Colorado, Oklahoma,
Wisconsin, Minnesota,
New Jersey, New York,
North Carolina, South
Carolina
Professional
Affiliations
Institute of Electrical and
Electronics Engineers
Lightning Protection
Institute
Christopher A. Heger, PE
Chris Heger joined Carollo in 2008, gaining experience in construction management and electrical and instrumentation design for both water and wastewater treatment facilities. Chris has experience in medium voltage and low voltage design, including development of conduit plans, design of power generation systems and automatic controls, P&ID development, and experience on many water and wastewater projects.

Relevant Experience
 Lead electrical and instrumentation engineer and project engineer for the City of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Draper Water
Treatment Plant Electrical Distribution System Upgrades. The existing plant distribution was designed around a radial feed. The project replaced the existing electrical system with a loop feed that is capable of supporting future processes and plant capacity expansions in the future. The design documents included, one-lines, elevations, detailed conduit plans, P&IDs, network drawings, and site duct bank routing with profiles.  Lead electrical engineer for South Platte
Renew, Colorado, Electrical Replacement
project. The project included the replacement of two low voltage automatic transfer switchgear and the replacement on of one
low voltage automatic transfer switchboard.

Design documentation included specifications, one-lines, conduit and duct bank routing, sequencing plan, digital network
drawings, schematics, and control descriptions.
 Lead electrical and instrumentation engineer for the City of Greeley, Colorado, Wastewater Treatment Plant, Regulation 85
Improvements project. The project includes
a new south secondary electrical building,
VFD starters for new process pumps, and
full automated control of upgraded aeration
basins. Design documentation included
specifications, one-lines, detailed conduit
and duct bank routing, and sequencing
plan.
 Electrical lead for the City of Aurora, Colorado, Wemlinger Water Purification Facility Electrical and Communications Improvements. Carollo was selected for this designbid-build project, which included $21.3 million of improvements to the existing 80- mgd Wemlinger WPF. A significant element
of the project involved modifying structures
to accommodate a new generator.This project included replacement of existing 12.47 kV service entrance gear with new 12.47 kV
service entrance automatic transfer switchgear with standby diesel generators to provide back-up power to the entire facility.

The Carollo team developed layouts and sequences to help transfer loads between the existing service entrance switchgear and the
new service entrance switchgear, avoiding
extended service interruptions and reliance
on temporary diesel generators for extended periods of time.  Electrical engineer for the Colorado
Springs Utilities, Colorado, Southern Delivery Project. The design project for the new 50-mgd Water Treatment Facility included a
medium voltage loop feed distribution system, with two standby generators, and a finished water pump station containing four 700-hp pumps, two 400-hp pumps, and
two 150-hp pumps. Three low voltage, arc
flash rated switchgears were utilized for distribution and all circuit breakers, power monitoring, and motor starters were networked using Devicenet and Ethernet TCP/IP. The processes utilized in the treatment facility include flocculation, sedimentation, filters, chemical addition, and ozone injection. The design documents included one-lines, elevations, conduit development
plans, cable tray routing plans, security and
fire alarm plans, and site duct bank routing.
 Electrical engineer for the Santa Fe Irrigation District, Rancho Santa Fe, California, R.E. Badger Water Filtration Plant Electrical
Distribution System Replacement project.

The project includes replacement of the 12
kV service entrance equipment, 4.16 kV
switchgear with hydroelectric generator synchronizing equipment, low voltage emergency generator, low voltage distribution switchgear, 7 MCCs, and all lighting/distribution panels. As part of the replacement of the MCCs, the existing controls and power
Christopher A. Heger, PE
B/Resumes/DNL/HegerChristopher.docx
cables were re-used, which required significant coordination between Carollo, the contractor, and the manufacturer of the MCCs.

Installation of the new switchgear also required the construction of a new electrical building where an isolated control room
was provided to remove the staff from arc
flash hazards.
 QA/QC for the Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, North Canadian WWTP Master Plan and Improvements project. The project includes the design of a system-wide 12.47 kV electrical loop system, site-wide fiber optic
system upgrades, and multiple improvements to rehabilitate critical electrical equipment (medium voltage switchgear, low voltage switchgear, MCC’s, panels, etc.) at the site. The project includes improvements to
the City’s 12.47 kV and 4.16 kV generation
systems to establish improved generator
backup capabilities in the system, while
providing a master plan for additional future
power backup to establish increased redundancy and reliability system-wide.  Lead electrical engineer for the City of
Grand Junction, Colorado, Master Plan and
Electrical System Study. The project included
a field investigation, master plan report with
recommended improvements and associated cost estimates, load study, shock hazard analysis, arc flash hazard analysis, and protective device coordination studies for
the City's Persigo Wastewater Treatment
Plant. The plant includes dual Utility power
to a loop fed medium voltage distribution
system with local low voltage distribution at
each process facility.
 Electrical engineer for the City of Aurora,
Colorado, Electrical System Study. The project included a field investigation as well as a load study, shock hazard analysis, arc flash
hazard analysis, and protective device coordination studies for 33 of their pumping and distribution facilities. The facilities range
from single pump installations up to eight
800-hp medium voltage pumps.
 Electrical engineer for the Los Angeles
Department of Water and Power, California,
Electrical System Study for the Los Angeles
Aqueduct Water Filtration Plant. The project
included the full field investigation as well as
a load study, shock hazard analysis, arc flash
hazard analysis, and protective device coordination studies for the 650-mgd Water Plant. The electrical system includes redundant service transformers to their medium voltage distribution switchgear, and 12-unit
substations for their low voltage distribution.
 Electrical engineer and project engineer
for the City of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma,
Electrical System Study. The project included
a field investigation as well as a load study,
shock hazard analysis, arc flash hazard analysis, and protective device coordination studies for 8 treatment facilities, and over 60
remote facilities in their pumping and distribution system. The facilities range from single pump installations up to 10 >1,000-hp medium voltage pumps.
 Construction management services during construction for the Colorado Springs Utilities, Colorado, Edward W. Bailey Southern Delivery System (SDS) project. The design project for the new 50-mgd water treatment facility included a medium voltage loop feed distribution system, with two standby generators, and a finished water
pump station containing four 700-hp
pumps, two 400-hp pumps, and two 150-hp
pumps. Three low voltage, arc flash rated
switchgears were utilized for distribution
and all circuit breakers, power monitoring,
and motor starters were networked using
Devicenet and Ethernet TCP/IP. The processes utilized in the treatment facility include flocculation, sedimentation, filters, chemical addition, and ozone injection.

Construction responsibilities included submittal reviews, design changes, site inspections, and as-built drawings.  QA/QC for the City of Oklahoma City,
Oklahoma, Hefner Water Treatment Plant
Electrical Loop Improvements. The project
consists of adding a medium voltage electrical service to the plant and interconnecting the electrical loop system to achieve enhanced redundancy and reliability. Finally, the project includes master planning for a
future substation, permanent generator system, and future essential electrical equipment upgrades. \\IO-BD-1\BDEducation
BS Electrical and
Electronic Engineering,
California State
University, Sacramento,
2008
Licenses
Electrical Engineer,
California
Professional
Affiliations
Institute of Electrical and
Electronic Engineers
Erik M. Bahneman, PE
Erik Bahneman is experienced in the design of electrical, instrumentation, and control systems for water and wastewater projects, including switchgear, motor controls, instrumentation, and supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems. His experience includes the coordination of electrical work with civil, structural, and mechanical work, during both the design and construction phases of a project.

Relevant Experience
 Electrical and instrumentation engineer
for the South Tahoe Public Utility (STPUD)
Tahoe Keys and Upper Truckee Pump Stations Replacement. Carollo designed the new pump station wet well, submersible
pump installation, and seismic retrofits and
developed a construction sequencing plan
that minimized the amount of time required
for bypass pumping.
 Instrumentation engineer for the Placer
County Sewer Maintenance District, California, Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrade and Expansion. Designed instrumentation
upgrades for most of the plant facility, including new facilities for biological removal of nutrients and a new ultraviolet disinfection system. Authored specifications including complete, detailed control strategies for plant processes, and wrote addendums for
electrical specifications.
 Electrical engineer for the West County
Wastewater, California, Carriage Hills,
D'Avila, La Honda, and Tara Hills Lift Stations
Upgrades. Various improvements at each lift
station included upgrades to electrical system including service modifications, new standby generators, sequencing evaluations,
hazardous area evaluations, ventilation,
pump and variable frequency drive replacement, new electrical gear replacement, site security communication system, and instrumentation.
 Electrical engineer for the Sacramento
Area Sewer District, California, Sailor Bar
Pump Station Rehabilitation. The project involved replacement of a wet-pit/dry-pit wastewater pump station with a new submersible station. A configuration of two separate wet wells and four pumps was selected to increase redundancy in an environmentally sensitive location. Other challenges included liquefiable soils, high turndown ratios between average and peak flows, dual force mains, transient surge protection, location in the 100-year floodplain, and construction sequencing to limit bypass
pumping requirements.
 Electrical and instrumentation engineer
for the City of Arcata, California Arcata
Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements
Final Design, Phase I. The project consisted
of the final design for replacement and new
treatment processes including headworks,
pond improvements, wetlands improvements, pump stations, a new oxidation ditch and secondary clarifiers for nutrient removal, and a new UV disinfections step.  Lead electrical and instrumentation engineer for the City of Woodland, California, Well Replacement. Designed the power distribution system, motor control center, and process controls for the new well site.

Worked with the City to integrate site particulars with existing city standards. Coordinated new service connections with PG&E.  Lead electrical engineer for the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District (Regional San), California, N19 Arden Pump
Station Wet Well Assessment and Remediation. In order to help Regional San maintain this valuable asset and restore its working
life to an acceptable level, Carollo thoroughly assessed the condition and structural integrity of the wet well structure and its components during this initial project.
 Lead electrical engineer for the City of
Menlo Park, California, Sharon Heights
Pump Station Replacement. The project entailed replacing a 50-year old pump station that is the only source of water for the Sharon Heights area of Menlo Park. As such, the pump station could not be removed
from service, and its site was severely constrained being surrounded by multi-million dollar homes. The project entailed coordination with the local community to build consent for the appearance of the new
pump station. The design of the new pump
Erik M. Bahneman, PE
\\IO-BD-1\BD-
station includes extensive sound control
measures, and the construction of a temporary pump station to maintain service while the new pump station is being built.  Electrical engineer for the Santa Clara Valley Water District, California, Penitencia
Delivery Main and Force Main Seismic Retrofit. The project involved replacement of existing 60-inch, 66-inch, and 72-inch diameter pipelines with new steel and earthquake resistant ductile iron pipe material  Lead electrical engineer for the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District, California, EchoWater Project $400 million
Tertiary Treatment Facilities Project (TTF).

TTF will provide filtration and disinfection of
secondary effluent to a level equivalent to
Title 22 requirements for tertiary disinfected
recycled water for unrestricted reuse. TTF includes a 330-mgd filter influent pump station, 217 mgd of granular media filters, backwash equalization and treatment,
chemical feed systems, covered disinfection
contact basin, three electrical substations,
and a new area control center.  Electrical engineer for the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District, California, EchoWater Project $130 million Flow Equalization Project (FEQ). FEQ will provide
an additional 110 MG of storage capacity for
the facility. Additional features include
roller-compacted concrete lined basins,
spillways and interconnections structures, an
84-inch diameter final effluent distribution
pipeline, underdrain pump station, and a
basin washdown system. The washdown
system consists of manual and automated
water cannons for efficient washdown of 60
acres of basin area.  Lead electrical engineer for the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District, California, EchoWater Project $50 million Nitrifying Sidestream Treatment Project (NST).

NST will use nitrifying sequencing batch reactors to reduce ammonia in the solids treatment system supernatant necessary to
meet interim permit conditions. It will also
produce nitrate-rich effluent for odor control. NST includes influent and effluent pumping and lime addition. The project was
accelerated to save $1.1 million per year in
avoided sodium hypochlorite costs.
 Electrical engineer for the Sacramento
Regional County Sanitation District, California, EchoWater Project Return Activated Sludge Pumping Project (RAS). To meet
new 2010 requirements for the State of California, the District implemented the $2 billion EchoWater Program. Carollo designed the $28.8 million RAS Project that replaced
48 activated sludge pumps (210 mgd of total capacity), designed to deliver the higher flow and head conditions required by the
new biological nutrient removal process.

The project also included above-ground
piping, valves, and flow meter replacement;
pump cans and underground piping replacement; and mixed liquor channel improvements. RAS received the 2020 Project of the Year Award from the Sacramento
Chapter of the American Public Works Association in the Environmental category.  Lead electrical engineer for the West County Wastewater District, California, Electrical Replacement. Designed the replacement and relocation of an existing 480V switchgear lineup serving the majority of the
plant’s motor control centers. Developed a
detailed construction sequencing plan designed to minimize the disruption to plant operations, and contributed to a plan for replacing the majority of the plant’s motor control centers.  Lead electrical engineer for the Napa Sanitation District, California, Phase I Recycled Water Expansion. Designed the power distribution systems, motor controls for a
secondary effluent pump station, pond
pump station, chlorine contact basin modifications, new dissolved air floatation clarifier with support facilities, two new filters, and
filter facilities expansion.  Lead electrical and instrumentation engineer for the City of South San Francisco, California, Water Quality Control Plant Capital Improvements. Designed power distribution systems, motor controls, a fiber optic communications network, and PLC-based
process automation systems for a new secondary clarifier, return activated sludge pumps, storm water pump stations, and
gates at three flow splitting structures.

B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Resumes\Final Education
BS Mechanical
Engineering Technology,
California State
University, Sacramento,
2000
Licenses
Electrical Engineer,
California
Daniel S. Robinson, PE
Daniel Robinson has 24 years of electrical and control systems experience in the water and wastewater industry. His experience includes supervising engineering teams, training new engineers, and developing engineering standards. Along with proficiency in AutoCAD Electric, Excel, Access, and SharePoint, Mr. Robinson’s engineering skills include 480VAC electrical distribution systems; variable frequency drives (VFDs), reduced voltage soft starter (RVSS), and full-voltage (FV) motor control design; programmable logic controller (PLC) and industrial control panel design; control system architecture; serial, Ethernet, and radio communication; process instrumentation requirements; water/wastewater treatment processes; project management; UL, NEC, NEMA, and NFPA 70E requirements; and relay and ladder logic.

Mr. Robinson’s primary responsibilities have included review of contractor plans and specifications and development of equipment packages to meet requirements; negotiation of changes, schedules, and equipment with customers, vendors, and end users; design of switchgear, motor control centers (MCCs), PLC panels, and instrumentation, control, and communication systems; creation of interconnection diagrams for power and control wiring between project equipment; creations of input/output (I/O) lists, loop diagrams, training documents, and factory and field test documentation; and development of control system descriptions, operations and maintenance (O&M) manuals, and load, thermal, and sizing calculations.

Mr. Robinson managed a design team to create, implement, and train an entire engineering department for transitioning to an electronic submittal process. He has been responsible for hundreds of projects as an engineering manager/supervisor.

Relevant Experience
 Instrumentation and controls engineer
for the City of Roseville, California, Dry Creek
Wastewater Treatment Plant MCC and
Switchgear Replacement Design-Build project. The project includes replacement of five motor control centers and one switchgear at the City's Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant. Carollo is providing design
and engineering services during construction to the lead design-builder, Auburn Constructors.
 Instrumentation and controls engineer
(I&C) for the City of Roseville, California, Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) Wells. The project involves design, permitting, and
construction of six new ASR wells injecting
treated water from Folsom Lake. The goal of
the project is to provide water supply resiliency during times of drought when the Folsom Lake supply may not provide the desired reliability. Assisted the lead I&C engineer with the initial phase of the I&C design, attended local meetings, attended the factory testing, and assisted with responses to requests for information and submittal review.
 Instrumentation and controls engineer
(I&C) for the City of Roseville, California,
Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant
UV Replacement. The project included evaluation of UV alternatives, CFD modeling, design, engineering services during construction, start up and commissioning, and regulatory support and permit modifications
for Title 22 recycled water production and
wet weather discharge to surface water. Responsible for assisting the lead I&C engineer with the initial phase of the I&C design, attending local meetings, and site inspection.  Instrumentation and controls engineer
for the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District, California, EchoWater Project Nitrifying Sidestream Treatment Project
(NST). NST uses sequencing batch reactors
to treat high ammonia loads being returned
to the Sacramento Regional Wastewater
Treatment Plant from the solids storage basins. The high nitrate NST effluent will then be used for odor control in the influent interceptor to offset the cost of sodium hypochlorite. The project includes influent and effluent pumping, sequencing batch reactors, effluent flow equalization, lime feed for Daniel S. Robinson, PE
B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Resumes\Final alkalinity control, aeration blowers, and associated electrical and instrumentation systems. NST must interface with several other EchoWater projects, including Site Preparation, Flow Equalization, Disinfection Chemical Storage, and Biological Nutrient Removal/Primary Effluent Pump Station.  Instrumentation and controls engineer
for the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District, California, EchoWater Project Tertiary Treatment Facilities Project (TTF).

TTF will provide filtration and disinfection of
secondary effluent to a level equivalent to
Title 22 requirements for tertiary disinfected
recycled water for unrestricted reuse. Tertiary facilities include a 330-mgd filter influent pump station, 217 mgd of granular media filters, backwash equalization and treatment, chemical feed systems, covered disinfection contact basin, and new area control center.
 Instrumentation and controls engineer
for the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District, California, EchoWater Project Flow Equalization Project (FEQ). The $158
million FEQ involves increasing the storage
capacity of the existing emergency storage
basins (ESBs) by 110 MG, lining the ESBs with
roller compacted concrete, and installing
new 84-inch-diameter basin interconnection piping, basin washdown system with an 8,000 gpm pump station and washdown
monitors, and basin underdrain system and
associated pump station to protect the liner
from groundwater uplift.
 Instrumentation and controls engineer
for the Clean Water Services, Oregon, Rock
Creek Advanced Wastewater Treatment Facility Centrifuge Replacement Final Design.

This project finalizes the design and provides bidding and permitting services for the installation of the two new centrifuges
as well as improvements to the odor control
system. The design included replacement of
existing belt filter presses with dewatering
centrifuges. Included voluntary seismic retrofit of the solids handling building to keep operators safe.
 Electrical and instrumentation engineer
for the Clear Water Services, Oregon, Hillsboro and Forest Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant UV Disinfection Systems
Upgrades. Carollo provided engineering
services to replace the District’s aging medium pressure UV disinfection system. Ultrahigh intensity low pressure lamps were selected to maintain a small number of lamps and small footprint while dramatically improving energy efficiency and performance.

The Calgon Carbon C3500D system was selected through a competitively evaluated bid process.
 Instrumentation and controls engineer
for the City of Livermore, California, Primary
and Secondary Treatment Improvements.

Design and construction services for replacement of various older existing power distribution components such as MCCs,
panelboards, lighting transformer transformers, controls panels, and instrumentation. This project also included major upgrade to power, control and communication circuits across the plant.
 Electrical/instrumentation engineer for
the City of Martinez, California, 2014 Electrical Power Distribution Upgrades. This project includes replacement of major electrical distribution equipment, including PG&E
main service transformer and associated
service conductors on the transformer secondary, main switchboard, four in-plant MCCs and associated feeder conductors
and conduit, 100-kVA transformer, and
feeder conductors and conduit between the
main switchboard and downstream MCCs
and equipment. The project also includes
implementation of a load-shedding scheme
and complex sequencing to reduce facility
downtime and ongoing City, PG&E, and
contractor coordination.
 Instrumentation and controls engineer
for the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District, California, EchoWater Project Return Activated Sludge Pumping Project
(RAS). This $32 million project will replace
existing RAS pumps with new pumps designed to deliver the higher flow and head conditions required by the new BNR process. The RAS pumping system will have a capacity of over 200 mgd and includes 48
pumps located at 24 secondary sedimentation tanks.
\\IO-BD-1\BDEducation
MS Civil Engineering,
California State
University, Sacramento,
2006
BS Civil Engineering,
California State
University, Sacramento,
2002
AS General Science, Yuba
Community College, 1999
Licenses
Civil Engineer, California,
Hawaii
Certification
Project Management
Bootcamp, PSMJ
Resources, Inc.

Professional
Affiliations
American Public Works
Association
Ryan A. Hook, PE
Ryan Hook has more than 21 years of civil engineering work experience, including planning, design, and construction of wastewater treatment facilities, wastewater pump stations and pipelines, potable water pump stations and pipelines, structural design of buildings, and soil percolation testing for septic systems.

Relevant Experience
 Construction manager for the City of
Roseville, California, Pleasant Grove
Wastewater Treatment Plant Design Assist
Aeration Improvements. The project consisted of installing new 30-HP and 75-HP aerators to the existing oxidation ditches.

Additional improvements included a new
charging station for the City’s electric vehicles, new jockey pump and automatic strainer for the Recycled Water system, two
new electrical buildings to accommodate
the increased electrical draw from the new
aerators, new submersible pumps for the
emergency storage basins, new treadplate
covers over various process areas, and miscellaneous paving, grading, piping, and site electrical improvements to accommodate
the new changes. Construction management duties included part-time field inspection, review of pay requests and proposed contract changes, coordination between the
City, contractor, and Carollo design staff,
and leading weekly meetings.
 Project manager for the West County
Wastewater, California, Carriage Hills,
D’Avila, La Honda, and Tara Hills Lift Station
Upgrades. Various improvements at each lift
station included pump replacement, wet
well concrete rehabilitation, evaluation of
bypass capabilities, pump hoist systems,
new standby generators, electrical system
upgrades, ventilation, site security communication system, and instrumentation.  Project engineer for the City of Folsom,
California, Zone 2 and Zone 3 Cimmaron
Pump Station Improvements. The project
included replacing three vertical turbine
pumps, installing four new pumps, installing
new cement mortar-lined steel pipe up to
36 inches in diameter, installing two new
surge tanks, and making modifications to
two steel tank reservoirs. Designed and developed plans, specifications, and cost estimates for the civil and mechanical aspects of the project. Also responsible for
coordinating work between the civil, mechanical, and electrical engineering disciplines. Performed civil and mechanical submittal review and answered requests for information during construction. Attended meetings with the City, construction manager, and contractor to expedite solutions to issues that arose during construction.
 Lead civil engineer for the Sacramento
Regional County Sanitation District, California, EchoWater Project Nitrifying Sidestream Treatment Project (NST). NST uses sequencing batch reactors to treat high ammonia loads being returned to the Sacramento Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant from the solids storage basins. The high nitrate
NST effluent will then be used for odor control in the influent interceptor to offset the cost of sodium hypochlorite. The project includes influent and effluent pumping, sequencing batch reactors, effluent flow equalization, lime feed for alkalinity control,
aeration blowers, and associated electrical
and instrumentation systems.
 Design engineer for preliminary design
of the Sausalito-Marin City Sanitary District,
California, Pump Station Reliability Improvements. The project increases the firm capacity of the District’s Main Street Pump Station to accommodate anticipated peak wet
weather flows by addition of a portable, 400
horsepower, diesel driven, standby pump
and replaces two existing 250-horsepower,
motor-driven pumps with new equipment.

The project also improves the reliability of
three other collection system pump stations
by providing connections for portable
standby pumps. Responsibilities included
developing the predesign concepts to improve the reliability of the three collection system pump stations.
 Project engineer for pump station preliminary design for the City of Modesto, California, River Trunk Realignment, Beard Brook Siphon and Cannery Segregation Line
(CSL) Improvements. The City’s wastewater
Ryan A. Hook, PE
\\IO-BD-1\BD-
collection and treatment system is divided
into two separate systems: the domestic
system and the segregated cannery process
water system. The main objectives of the
project are to address capacity and structural deficiencies in the Sutter and River Trunk systems, as well as capacity and operations and maintenance (O&M) issues associated with the Beard Brook Siphon. During conceptual development, additional objectives were identified: address CSL peak flow limitations, improve River Trunk O&M access, and mitigate vulnerability of river washout. Eight pipeline reaches were evaluated and designed to address the main objectives of project. New 54- to 84-inch-diameter sewers in excess of 30 feet deep were evaluated to relocate the River Trunk
sewer out of the Tuolumne River floodplain.

In addition to the gravity sewer relocation, a
new 54.5-mgd pump station approximately
80 feet deep was designed.  Design engineer for Santa Cruz County Sanitation District, California, Noble Gulch
Trunkline Relocation Project. As part of an
On-call Sewer Improvements contract, the
project included the relocation of an existing trunk line following Noble Gulch into nearby roads to reduce environmental impacts and improve accessibility. The project included upsizing 6,600 feet of gravity pilot
tube auger boring and CIPP. The existing
trunk sewer was upsized from 12 to 15
inches to eliminate capacity constraints. Responsibilities included developing plans to achieve the desired slope of the sewer and
layout of the boring pits.  Project engineer for the Nevada Irrigation District, California, Elizabeth George/ Loma Rica Intertie Pump Station. The project included construction of a new 2.6-mgd booster pump station to pump potable water during high demand periods between the District’s two water treatment plants’ finished water storage tanks thereby increasing the treatment plant capacity. Project elements included three vertical turbine pumps, propane standby generator, and
concrete masonry unit building to protect
the pumps and generator. Responsible for
pump selection, pump station layout design,
coordination with other disciplines and subconsultants, and project meetings.  Design engineer for the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District, California, EchoWater Project Return Activated Sludge
Pumping Project (RAS). Assisted with development of project sequencing for the $32 million RAS, which replaces existing return
activated sludge pumps with new pumps
designed to deliver the higher flow and
head conditions required by the new biological nutrient removal (BNR) process. RAS will have a capacity of more than 200 mgd
and includes 48 pumps located at 24 secondary sedimentation tanks. Preliminary design included an in-depth implementation plan to allow construction of improvements
while minimizing the impact on the operation of the existing plant, as well as a completion schedule to allow timely commissioning of the new BNR facility.  Civil engineering discipline technical advisor for the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District, California, EchoWater
Project Flow Equalization Project (FEQ). The
$130 million FEQ will provide an additional
110 MG of storage capacity for the Sacramento Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. Additional features include roller-
compacted concrete lined basins, spillways
and interconnections structures, 84-inch-diameter final effluent distribution pipeline, underdrain pump station, and basin washdown system. The washdown system consists of manual and automated water cannons for efficient washdown of the over 60 acres of basin area.  Project engineer for the El Dorado Irrigation District, California, El Dorado Hills Wastewater Treatment Plant Phase III Expansion, which increased the capacity of the treatment plant to 8.4 mgd. The project
consisted of numerous modifications and
additions to the existing treatment facility,
including adding two biological nutrient removal basins and two aeration basins. Responsible for the biological nutrient removal and aeration basin designs. Assigned tasks
to subordinate engineers and drafters and
coordinated work with other consultants
and subconsultants.
\\IO-BD-1\BDEducation
MS Engineering Systems,
Colorado School of
Mines, 2012
BS Electrical Engineering,
Colorado School of
Mines, 2008
Licenses
Professional Engineer,
Arizona, Florida,
Colorado, New Mexico
Professional
Affiliations
Institute of Electrical and
Electronics Engineers
Certified
Designer/Inspector,
Lightning Protection
Institute
Marissa J. Petty, PE
Marissa Petty has 16 years of experience in electrical and instrumentation design and construction management of water and wastewater treatment facilities. Her electrical experience includes power distribution, lighting, motor controls, grounding, and electrical system studies. Marissa's instrumentation experience includes the development of process and instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs). She is also experienced in the coordination of electrical and instrumentation work with civil, structural, and mechanical work during design and construction. Marissa specializes in the replacement of existing electrical equipment, construction sequencing, and master planning.

Relevant Experience
 Electrical design engineer for the Upper
Blue Sanitation District, Breckenridge, Colorado – Farmers Korner North Plant. The expansion of this wastewater treatment plant included upgrading the existing headworks,
and the addition of aeration basins, secondary clarification, filters, chemical feed system, and high-rate flocculation and sedimentation. Design responsibilities included electrical distribution, lighting design, motor controls, and grounding. ESDC were also performed including submittal reviews, design changes, and as-built drawings.
 Electrical and instrumentation design
engineer for San Joaquin County, California
– Two Distribution Pump Stations for the
Mountain House Wastewater Treatment
Plant. The project included the electrical distribution, standby generation system, and instrumentation and control design for two
remote wastewater pump stations being
added to the Mountain House wastewater
distribution system.
 Lead EI&C field engineer for the Metro
Wastewater Reclamation District, Denver,
Colorado – PAR 1085 South Secondary Improvements. Responsibilities included oversight of all EI&C submittal reviews, response to request for information, design changes,
and as-built drawings. Other responsibilities
included development of startup and testing plans for electrical and instrumentation; coordination of Owner performed work, assisting with troubleshooting of protective relays; electrical system training; and oversight of electrical and instrumentation inspections. Electrical equipment included medium voltage switchgear, low voltage
Switchgear, substation transformers, MCCs
with smart overloads, RVSS, and VFDs.
 Project manager for the Albuquerque
Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority
(ABCWUA), New Mexico – Multiple Electrical
Projects at Southside Wastewater Reclamation Plant. The projects include multiple medium voltage loop improvements, including MCC and SWGR Replacement, Re-use
Building Loop 3 Power Design and the Loop
A & B project, as well as the Electrical Master
Plan and the Electrical Systelectriclem Studies. The projects will provide increased maintainability, safety, reliability, code compliance, and replacement of aging equipment that is strategically sequenced to target the most critical projects and also to confirm all new installation complies with
the Water Authority’s standards.
 Lead EI&C design engineer for the City
of Oklahoma City – WT-0108 Low Lift Pump
Station Improvements at the Hefner WTP.

The project included preliminary study, final
design, and construction. Study included
evaluating medium voltage loop, condition
assessment, construction sequencing, and
pre-design for the new Low Lift Pump Station including two new PLC cabinets. Final design elements included preparation of
detailed drawings and specifications. Construction included oversight of all EI&C submittal reviews, response to RFI, design changes, and as-built drawings.
 Project manager for the Metro
Wastewater Reclamation District, Denver,
Colorado – PAR 1247 Electrical Transformer
Replacement Project. This project included
the replacement of two 4.16 kV to 13.2 kV
substation transformers with low resistance
and zig-zag transformer grounding, two

13.2 kV to 480 V substation transformers
with high resistance grounding, and a 480 V
load center. The design included extensive
Marissa J. Petty, PE
\\IO-BD-1\BD-
sequencing, construction of temporary facilities, schedule coordination, and liquidated damages.  Project engineer for the City of Riverside,
California – Switchgear Assessment Study.

The project included switchgear assessment
to evaluate condition and prioritize replacement to provide flexibility for future plant expansion. The project evaluated automatic
transfer to generator issues and utilized
technicians to repair the non-functioning
critical system. The project was also expanded to master plan upgrades to the 15 kV underground electrical distribution system.  Electrical engineer for the City of Peoria, Arizona – Beardsley WRF Expansion Project.

The capacity of the Beardsley Road WRF
was increased from 4 to 6 mgd. The project
elements included upgrades to headworks,
grit removal, aeration basins, blowers, filtration, disinfection, and odor control systems.

The design also added new secondary clarifiers, RAS/ WAS pumping, upgrades to new UV disinfection equipment, and added a
new reclaimed water pump station serving
offsite reuse customers. In addition to electrical upgrades associated with the process improvements, the electrical distribution
system nearing capacity was expanded, upgraded, and master planned to accommodate future expansion and allow equipment reaching end of useful life to be replaced.  Electrical engineer for the American Valley Community Services District, Quincy, California, American Valley WWTP Improvements. Project included the addition of new headworks, AerMod system, blower building, and dewatering building. New electrical equipment includes substation transformers,
outdoor generator, automatic transfer
switchgear, motor control centers, and low
voltage electrical distribution for each building.  Electrical engineer for the City of Mesa, Arizona – Greenfield Water Reclamation
Plant Phase III Expansion. Carollo was
retained to provide engineering services
during construction. Responsibilities include
oversight of all EI&C submittal reviews,
response to request for information, design
changes, and as-built drawings. Other
responsibilities include ensuring Owner
standards are being followed by the
Contractor.  Project
manager for the Clifton Water
District, Colorado – Arc Flash Study. The
project included electrical system studies, including short circuit, coordination, and arc flash. Field investigation was performed to
document all electrical equipment, cable
sizes, code issues, and equipment conditions issues. Additionally, a computer model, report, and pictorial one-line were
created, along with conducting arc flash
training.  Lead EI&C engineer for the City of Sedona, Arizona – Wastewater Collection System Improvements Design. Project included design of two lift stations including radio
communication, utility coordination, motor
control, standby generators, portable generator connections, and instrumentation. In addition, detailed sequencing was developed to maintain the lift stations throughout construction.  Lead EI&C engineer for the Metro Wastewater Reclamation District, Denver,
Colorado – PAR 1259 Digester Complex Rehabilitation Project. This work involved design and construction of digester modifications to improve system reliability, redundancy, and maintainability. Responsibilities included conduit routing and network design to add multiple motorized valves to the Digesters.  Lead EI&C engineer for the Metro
Wastewater Reclamation District, Denver,
Colorado – PAR 1225 South Headworks and
Grease Processing Improvements. This project includes addition and modification of all south headworks components including
screening, screening handling, grit removal
and grit handling and replacement of the
grease processing building. Responsibilities
included lighting design, conduit routing,
P&ID development, network design, and
480V power distribution, including substation transformers, a load center, MCCs, and unitized distribution substations.
\\IO-BD-1\BD-Data\Marketing\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Resumes\Final Resumes\8- Education
BS Engineering, Colorado
School of Mines, 2012
Jeffrey L. West
Jeffrey West joined Carollo in 2019 as an electrical engineer and has experience with water and wastewater projects. Prior to joining Carollo, he served as a project engineer, where he planned and executed capital improvement projects in the steel, food and beverage, and plastic manufacturing industries.

Wastewater Treatment
 Electrical engineer for the City of Roseville, California, Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant MCC and Switchgear Replacement Design-Build project. The project includes replacement of five motor control centers and one switchgear at the
City's Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment
Plant. Carollo is providing design and engineering services during construction to the lead design builder, Auburn Constructors.
 Electrical engineer for the Orange
County Sanitation District, California, P1-
105 Headworks Rehabilitation and Plant
1Expansion. This project will expand the
capacity at Plant 1 from 280 mgd to 320
mgd. The project included comprehensive
rehabilitation and expansion of influent
flow metering and diversion, bar screens,
screenings handling, influent pumping,
grit handling, primary flow splitting and
metering, odor scrubbers, and electrical
buildings. Responsible for development of
the 100 percent electrical design and
specifications, as well as engineering services during construction.  Electrical engineer for the City of Meridian, Idaho, Side Stream Phosphorous Recovery project. The project involved the
addition of a new building and phosphorus (struvite) recovery process. Responsible for development of the 100 percent electrical design and specifications, as well
as engineering services during construction.
 Electrical engineer for the Milwaukee
Metropolitan Sewerage District, Wisconsin, S02015 Aeration Diffuser Replacement Project at the South Shore Water Reclamation Facility. The project will retrofit 28 aeration basins at the 300-mgd facility with a new aeration system. The project includes new diffusers, new droplegs, aeration control and valves, and selector
zones and baffle walls to improve the secondary process reliability at the facility.

Responsible for development of the 100
percent electrical design and specifications, as well as engineering services during construction.  Electrical engineer for Clean Water Services, Washington, Forest Grove UV Replacement project. The project involved replacement of existing UV equipment
with a new UV facility. Responsible for development of the 100 percent electrical design and specifications, as well as engineering services during construction.  Electrical engineer for the Veolia Water
Critical Improvements Project at the City
of Richmond, California, Wastewater
Treatment Plant. The project consisted of
major process upgrades, including a new
screening/grit removal facility, aeration
upgrades, and secondary clarifier replacement.

Water Treatment
 Electrical engineer for the Collier
County, Florida, Isle of Capri Surge Control
System engineering services during construction. The project involved design and installation of a hydropneumatic surge
control system located at the Isle of Capri
Water Pump Station. Responsible for development of the 100 percent electrical design and specifications, as well as engineering services during construction.  Electrical engineer for the Collier
County, Florida, North County Regional
Water Treatment Plant Surge Control System engineering services during construction. The project involved design and installation of a hydropneumatic surge control system located at the North County Regional Water Treatment Plant. Responsible for development of the 100 percent electrical design and specifications, as well
Jeffrey L. West
\\IO-BD-1\BD-Data\Marketing\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Resumes\Final Resumes\8- Awards
Other
Accomplishments
Open for Quote
as engineering services during construction.
 Electrical engineer for the Alameda
County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, California, Mocho Groundwater Demineralization Plant Concentrate Conditioning System. The project included
replacement of the critical reverse osmosis concentrate pumps and construction of a new sulfuric acid chemical building. Responsible for development of the 100 percent electrical design and specifications, as well as engineering services during construction.
 Electrical engineer for the Centennial
Water and Sanitation District, Colorado,
Joseph Blake Water Treatment Plant
Phase 1A Improvements. The project involved replacement of all rapid mix, flocculation, and sedimentation equipment and installation of a new chemical storage
and feed facility for the 40-mgd plant. Responsible for development of the 100 percent electrical design and specifications, as well as engineering services during construction.
 Electrical engineer for the Centennial
Water and Sanitation District, Colorado,
Joseph Blake Water Treatment Plant
Phase 1B Improvements. The project involved construction of a new chemical building and replacement of the existing
480V main distribution and standby generation equipment. Responsible for development of the 100 percent electrical design and specifications, as well as engineering services during construction.

B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Resumes\Final Education
MS Civil Engineering,
University of California,
Berkeley, 1994
BS Civil Engineering,
University of California,
Irvine, 1993
Licenses
Structural Engineer,
California, Oregon, Utah,
Washington
Civil/Structural Engineer,
South Dakota
Civil Engineer, California,
Colorado
Professional
Affiliations
American Concrete
Institute
American Institute of
Steel Construction
James A. Doering, PE, SE
James Doering, a registered structural and civil engineer, is Carollo’s structural lead engineer in Southern California. He manages structural design and evaluations for large and small projects. He has 30 years of experience in structural analysis, design, seismic retrofit, rehabilitation, review, and assessment for a variety of structures, such as wastewater and water treatment facilities, pump stations, reservoirs, tanks, clarifiers, large pipe supports, retaining walls, operations and maintenance facilities, office buildings, parking structures, post tensioned concrete structures, retail shopping centers, and warehouses.

Relevant Experience
 Structural engineer for the Rock Creek
Wastewater Treatment Plant Centrifuge Replacement, Clean Water Services, Oregon.

This project finalizes the design and provides bidding and permitting services for the installation of the two new centrifuges
as well as improvements to the odor control
system. The design included replacement of
existing belt filter presses with dewatering
centrifuges. Included was also an ASCE 41-
17 seismic evaluation and voluntary retrofit
of the multi-story solids handling building to
keep operators safe. Retrofit items included
addition of new steel braced frames,
strengthening of gusset connections, and
addition of column anchorage to the foundation.
 Structural engineer for the City of Wilsonville, Oregon, Wastewater Treatment Facilities Plan 2020. A seismic evaluation using ASCE 41-17 for the buildings and ACI 350
for water-bearing structures was performed
to assess whether facilities at the City’s
wastewater treatment plant are capable of
meeting state of Oregon resiliency goals
considering a M9.0 Cascadia Subduction
Zone (CSZ) earthquake. Vulnerabilities and
mitigation recommendations were summarized in a technical memorandum.  Lead structural engineer for the County
of San Luis Obispo Los Osos Water Reclamation Facility. The project included a new 3-mgd wastewater treatment plant with
headworks, oxidation ditch, secondary clarifiers, equalization pond, digester, solids handling, blower building, electrical building, and administrative/maintenance facilities. Challenges at the site included high seismicity and expansive soils.
 Structural engineer for the City of Simi
Valley, California, WQCP Electrical Motor
Control Center Replacement. This project
replaced most of the 480-volt electrical distribution system including: the main service entrance switchboard, two lineups of fused
disconnect distribution switchgear, one automatic transfer switch, and two motor control centers.  Structural engineer for the City of Tacoma, Washington, Electrical Distribution Design project. The design included replacing CTP’s main 15 kV switchgear and repowering the existing transformers and load centers from the new switchgear. The project adds more than 3,000 lineal feet of concrete encased reinforced duct bank, installs over 20 miles of MV electrical cables, constructs a 3,400 square foot building for storing and operating the new electrical equipment, and installs a new 15-kV switchgear with pad-mounted transformers.
 Structural engineer for West Basin Municipal Water District, Pall Microfiltration Expansion at the Edward C. Little Water Recycling Facility in El Segundo, California. The project provides a 3 mgd capacity expansion. Structural work includes expansion of steel-framed canopies, pipe supports, and
anchorage of critical equipment.
 Structural engineer for the Veolia Water
West Operating Services/City of Palm
Springs, California, Wastewater Treatment
Plant Upgrade. The project included a new
22 mgd capacity headworks with Parshall
flume and influent pump station, two new
100-ft diameter primary clarifiers with FRP
launders, a primary sludge pump station, an
elevated sludge degritting facility, odor control, replacement of the existing Digester No. 2 floating steel dome with a new fixed
steel dome, and an electrical building.

James A. Doering, PE, SE
B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Resumes\Final Open for Quote
“Without a doubt
James Doering added
a tremendous value
to the Carollo team
and was absolutely a
contributing factor to
the overall success of
these critical projects
at the EWPCF.”
- James Kearns,
Capital Projects
Manager, Encina
Wastewater
Authority, referring to
the EWPCF Influent
Junction Structure
Rehab and Ocean
Outfall-Landfall
Inspection projects
 Structural engineer for El Estero
Wastewater Treatment Plant Digester Nos. 1
and 2 Rehabilitation for the City of Santa
Barbara, California. The project included
identification of cracks at the interior of the
digesters requiring repairs/sealing and
preparation of associated details and repair
procedures. The interior concrete was also
repaired and coated with a polyurethane
spray-on liner.
 Value engineering team member for the
Phase III Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion for the Victor Valley Water Reclamation Authority, Victorville, California. The project involved the design of a $110-million
expansion to the existing wastewater treatment plant. Facilities proposed included a membrane bioreactor (MBR) facility comprised of ultraviolet (UV) Disinfection and Membrane Trains with associated tankage
and a maintenance/control building. The
MBR facility was an outdoor facility with a
saw-tooth shaped steel-framed canopy with
overhead bridge cranes in three bays. Tasks
included the development of value engineering proposals for the structural and architectural elements of the project.  Structural engineer for engineering services during construction for the $192 million Headworks Replacement project for the 340-mgd Orange County Sanitation District
Wastewater Treatment Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach, California. The project included facilities for metering, bar screening, screenings handling, grit removal, grit handling, odor control, chemical handling, and power distribution. The project also included an elevated 84-inch welded steel pipe for temporary bypass to facilitate construction
 Structural engineer for the Post Point
Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements
for the City of Bellingham, Washington. The
project included modifications to the existing primary effluent pump station to facilitate the flow of an elevated hydraulic grade line. The design includes two aeration basins, a 120-foot diameter secondary clarifier on auger-cast piles with a wagon wheel feature roof structure, a blower building, and retrofit of an existing high-purity oxygen basin.
 Structural engineer for the J.B. Latham
Wastewater Treatment Plant Digester No. 3
Upgrades for the South Orange County
Wastewater Authority, California. The project included rebuilding of the interior concrete surface at the upper walls and bottom of the roof slab with shotcrete and the provision of a protective liner.  Structural engineer for the Phase II
Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion for
the City of Santa Maria, California. Facility
additions included a 145-foot diameter primary clarifier, trickling filter, anaerobic digester, digester control building, sludge drying beds, and a bar screen addition to the existing headworks.
 Structural engineer for the La Salina
Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrades for
the City of Oceanside, California. The project
included rehabilitation and upgrades to the
following facilities: headworks, primary clarifiers, aeration basin/secondary clarifier, digestion, dissolved air flotation thickener, and administration building.
 Structural engineer for the 2007 Water
Distribution System Assessment for the City
of Garden Grove, California. Completed facilities assessments consisting of 18 sites, which included 10 wells, 5 reservoirs, and 5
pressure-reducing stations, along with associated pumping stations, mechanical, structural, and electrical systems.  Structural engineer for the City of
Oceanside, California, San Luis Rey Water
Reclamation Plant Expansion. The project
included a flash mix pump station for chemical addition, chemical storage and pumping facility, and pump station design for process
feed water, drainage pump stations, and
plant water reuse pumps. A new electrical
and controls building was designed to
house the new electrical equipment and
provide controls and monitoring to match
and communicate with the existing SCADA
system.

B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Resumes\Final Education
BARCH in Architecture,
Norwich University, 2001
Licenses
Registered Architect,
Arizona, New Mexico,
Nebraska, Texas, Utah,
Idaho, North Dakota,
South Dakota,
Minnesota, Hawaii, Iowa,
Virginia
Certifications
LEED Accredited
Professional BD+C, U.S.

Green Building Council,
2011
LEED Accredited
Professional, U.S. Green
Building Council, 2006
Professional
Affiliations
U.S. Green Building
Council, Arizona Chapter
Michele E. Hollenbaugh, RA, LEED AP
Michele Hollenbaugh is a detail-oriented professional architect with 22 years of experience in the design, delivery, construction, and management of water and wastewater treatment plants. Her work experience includes renovation to existing construction, plant design, administration buildings, laboratories, maintenance buildings, operational buildings, pump stations, and tenant improvements. Ms. Hollenbaugh has extensive knowledge of the International Code Council’s Publications, ADA, ASTM, ANSI, and NFPA standards. In addition, her experience encompasses working with federal, state, and local authorities having jurisdiction. She is skilled in developing detailed construction documents, drafting utilizing Autodesk and Bentley Suite products, producing specifications using Microsoft applications, and cost estimating. Ms. Hollenbaugh also possesses experience with construction methods and building materials utilized locally and nationally, and provided construction services through RFI’s, RFA’s, engineers clarifications, submittal review, punch list, on-site inspections, and as-built construction drawings.

Relevant Experience
 Lead architect for the City of Richmond,
California, Wastewater Treatment Plant
(WWTP) Critical Improvements Project. This
project features major process upgrades
that improve the overall reliability and condition of the WWTP including plant-wide seismic evaluations. A project element the
architectural team assisted with was the
Blower Building with an electrical room design and construction.  Project architect for the Los Angeles
County Sanitation District, California, Valencia Advanced Wastewater Treatment Facility (AWTF). Ms. Hollenbaugh assisted the team
with the completion the design for a 7-mgd
AWTF project to remove chloride from the
Santa Clarita Valley Sanitation District’s Valencia Water Reclamation Plant before it is discharged to the Santa Clarita River. The
project is currently under construction includes a prefabricated metal building to house the ultraviolet disinfection, microfiltration, nanofiltration, electrical building, and a control room with a restroom.
 Project architect for the San Francisco
Public Utilities Commission, California,
Treasure Island Recycled Water Plant Expansion. Carollo has been retained to address aging infrastructure, ensure regulatory compliance and to satisfy wastewater and recycled water needs for future development on the island. Development of the plant included new structures for process and electrical needs and included an Operations and Operations and Maintenance building for
the plant staff. The plans developed for
these buildings will be provided as part of
the bridging documents for the Design
Build team. Additionally, we assist with the
Civic Design Review portion of the project
to align the look of the plant with the master plan for the islands redevelopment and industrial construction embraced by the review board.
 Project architect for the City of Woodland, California, ASR Wells 29 & 30. This project involved design, coordination, and
bid phase services for two building to house
the ASR Wells, Wastewater lineup, sodium
hypochlorite dosing system, and the generator at Well 30. Coordination of the disciplines included internal and external sub consultants. Review of the documents was
completed by a third-party consultant and
required additional coordination and revisions, RFI's, and RFA's, and assistance during the construction phase.
 Project architect for the Elsinore Valley
Municipal Water District, California, Regional
Water Reclamation Facility Program Management project. The project included administration building rehabilitation (office, laboratory, staff breakroom, and storage
room), site visits, review of existing drawings, and programming of new spaces with the issuance of contract documents.

Michele also assisted with bid, submittal review and RFI’s during construction.  Project architect for the City of San Diego, California, Assessment of the Alvarado and NTC Laboratory Complexes to manage
Michele E. Hollenbaugh, RA, LEED AP
B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Resumes\Final a condition assessment for the City’s laboratory complexes at their Alvarado and NTC facilities. Project included alternatives to improve the City’s existing facilities. Alternatives included building expansions, reorganization of spaces and finish updates.  Project architect for the City of Logan,
Utah, Wastewater Treatment Facilities. The
purpose of this project was to provide
wastewater treatment facilities capable of
complying with EPA's environmental effluent standards for phosphorus and ammonia. The project involved design and construction administration services for a threestage Bardenpho™ bio-reactor mechanical treatment facility. Project elements included:
a headworks facility basin; influent pump
station building; eight bio-reactor basins;
eight secondary clarifier basins; solids return
and waste pump station building; two solids
holding tanks; tertiary filter building; solids
dewatering building; odor control building;
administration building housing office
space, training rooms, laboratory, public
area; and electrical building.
 Project architect for the San Jacinto
River Authority, Woodlands, Texas,
Wastewater Treatment Facility No. 2 Disinfection System Improvements. This project was initiated due to operational and hydraulic limitations of the existing facility's ultraviolet (UV) disinfection system. The objectives of the project were to replace the UV system with a chlorine gas disinfection system including the associated mechanical, electrical, and SCADA improvements. The
new facilities will comply with applicable
building, fire, environmental codes and regulations, and will provide safe and secure facilities for the new disinfection storage feed system.
 Project architect for the Delta Diablo
Sanitation District, Antioch, California, Treatment Wide Color Scheme. This project involved repainting the exterior of Delta Diablo's major facilities and process structures at its wastewater treatment plant to provide
a more modern and contemporary look.

The aesthetically pleasing color schemes
were incorporated into guidelines for future
design improvement projects for these facilities and structures.  Project architect for the Snyderville Basin
Water Reclamation District, Park City, Utah,
Silver Creek Water Reclamation Facility Expansion. This project was the second facility constructed by the Snyderville Basin Water
Reclamation District and was designed to
complement the first plant’s architectural
design, including pitched asphalt shingled
roofs, HVAC units internal to the spaces,
concrete masonry unit construction, and interior finishes. Existing materials and design details were integrated with current building, fire, and energy conservation codes and included compliance with COMcheck. In addition, seismic requirements were an integral design consideration and had to be coordinated with compliance, as outlined in the energy conservation code. The design
of these eight buildings was a team effort
including the process design layouts working within these constraints, incorporating electrical, and HVAC with the new energy
conservation code. Color renderings of the
buildings were provided to the client as part
of this process. Ms. Hollenbaugh provided
assistance from the preliminary design
phase through construction administration.

During the project she worked with the Client Services Manager, Project Manager, Discipline Leads, and the Field Engineer to assist in the delivery of this project, which is currently under construction.
 Project architect for the Jordan Valley
Conservancy District, Utah, Jordan Valley
Water Treatment Facility Filter and Chemical
Feed Upgrades. To support growing peak
day demands and enable treatment of a
new water supply, the District is expanding
the JVWTP from its current 180 mgd capacity to a future capacity of 255 mgd. The project modifies and re-rates the existing filters to achieve plant expansion and provides
new and expanded operator-friendly chemical feed systems. The project includes preliminary design, final design, and construction services. Ms. Hollenbaugh provided assistance from the preliminary design phase through construction administration. During
the project she worked with the Client Services Manager, Project Manager, Discipline Leads, and the Field Engineer to assist in the
delivery of this project, which is currently
under construction.

B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Resumes\Final Resumes\11-WarrenJenny (2) Final docx
Education
MS Environmental
Engineering, University of
California, Davis, 2008
BS Civil Engineering,
University of Texas at
Austin, 2003
Licenses
Professional Engineer,
Alaska, Montana
Professional
Affiliations
Water Environment
Federation (WEF)
WEF Delegate for State
of Alaska
Alaska Water and
Wastewater Management
Association, Past
President, Vice President,
and Trustee
Awards
Civil Engineering Robert
S. Braden Technical
Communication Award,
University of Texas at
Austin
Department of Civil
Engineering Leadership
Award, University of
Texas at Austin
Jennifer Warren, PE
Jennifer Warren is an environmental engineer with more than 15 years of experience.

She excels in various aspects of water and wastewater engineering, including project management, design, permitting, water quality analysis, technical writing, and construction administration. Jennifer is detail-oriented and diligent with excellent interpersonal skills and a constant focus on the budget and deadline of a project.

Relevant Experience
 Design manager for City of Roseville,
California, Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment
Plant’s Foul Air Collection System and Biofilter Rehabilitation Project., which is occurring under the design assist construction model.

The project includes re-placement of the existing foul air collection system in the WWTP’s screening, grit, and primary clarification areas and re-placement of the existing biofilter.  Process engineer for the City of Roseville, California, Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant 30-mgd UV Design Assist
Project, which entailed conversion from
chlorination to ultraviolet for disinfection.

Responsibilities included pipeline design
and layout for revisions to a non-potable
water system, drainage for the UV basin and
utility trenches, and evaluation of existing air
compressor and air receiver for operation of
upflow sand filters and pneumatic valves.

Provided engineering services during construction.
 Project engineer for the City of Roseville,
California, Pleasant Grove Wastewater
Treatment Plant 30-mgd UV Design Assist
Project. Designed the conversion of the
chlorine contact basin to a recycled water
storage basin and expansion of the coarse
bubble channel aeration system and in-line
screens for filtration of neutrally buoyant
plastics.
 Design engineer for the City of Roseville,
California, Pleasant Grove Wastewater
Treatment Plant Phase I Expansion, which
involved increasing the flow from 12 mgd to
15 mgd. Duties included conducting design
calculations and preparing plans and specifications for a pumped mixing system for the influent to the primary clarifiers and a
fine screen facility.
 Design Manager and Project Engineer
for South Tahoe Public Utilities District, California, Wastewater Treatment Plant RAS Pump Station (PS) Building Rehabilitation
Project, which encompasses rehabilitating
the existing sludge PS due to the age of the
pumps and electrical components, issues
with process control of the existing pumping strategy, and seismic vulnerability of the building. An alternatives analysis was conducted that utilized hydraulic analysis, structural analysis, process optimization evaluation, and cost estimating to determine the optimal alternative between replace in kind,
a decentralized RAS pumping scenario, and
a new centralized RAS/WAS PS. Currently
developing 30% design submittal of the recommended alternative, the new centralized RAS/WAS PS with new electrical building.
 Project engineer for South Tahoe Public
Utilities District, California, Wastewater
Treatment Plant Recycled Water Strategic
Plan. Responsibilities include development
of conceptual level sizing of treatment trains
for nutrient removal and corresponding cost
estimates for various recycle disposal alternatives.
 Project engineer for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation California Men’s Colony Wastewater Treatment Plant Disinfection Upgrade (5.2 mgd).

Designed the ultraviolet disinfection system,
tertiary treatment system, pump stations, effluent storage structure, effluent metering vault, and sodium hypochlorite dosing for
recycled water and potable water. Conducted design calculations for UV system, pump sizing, and tertiary treatment system
hydraulic calculations. Prepared plans and
specifications.
 Project engineer for the City of Galt, California, NPDES Permit Renewal Assistance.

Provided regulatory assistance for the
Wastewater Treatment Plant and Reclamation Facility during the permitting process to Jennifer Warren, PE
B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Resumes\Final Resumes\11-WarrenJenny (2) Final docx
Other
Accomplishments
National Institute of
Health Biotechnology
Fellow at University of
California, Davis.
2003 National Science
Foundation-funded
research assistant at the
Montana State University
Center for Biofilm
Engineering on project
using continuous flow
reactors to evaluate
oxidative species for
disinfection.
2002 National Science
Foundation-funded
research assistant at the
University of Colorado,
Boulder, Environmental
Engineering Department
on project evaluating
enhanced in-situ
bioremediation.
obtain an NPDES permit. Prepared multiple
letters to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and reports, including a Compliance Schedule Justification Statement and Analytical Methods Report.
 Process engineer for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Deuel Vocational Institution Wastewater
Treatment Plant. Assisted with the preparation of an NPDES permit application and Report of Waste Discharge. Provided regulatory assistance, including preparation of a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation Work Plan
and coordination with the Regional Water
Quality Control Board to relocate sampling
locations.
 Process engineer for the City of Chico
Water Pollution Control Plant (12 mgd) Permit Assistance. Prepared an NPDES permit application and Report of Waste Discharge,
including Technical Report. Worked with the
Regional Water Quality Control Board to
obtain accurate effluent limits in accordance
with state and federal regulations. Assisted
with writing technical reports for permit
compliance, including a Project Performance Certification Report to satisfy the requirements of the State Revolving Fund Loan Program.
 Project engineer for Lucero Olive Oil,
LLC, California, Report of Waste Discharge
(ROWD) Technical Report Assistance. Prepared the ROWD for land application of process waters and worked with the Regional Water Quality Control Board to obtain Waste Discharge Requirements. Performed calculations to determine appropriate application rates to meet regulatory nutrient loading limits and conducted an evaluation of the stormwater runoff containment. Prepared process schematics and liquid and solid mass balances for the ROWD.  Project engineer for the California Olive
Ranch, Report of Waste Discharge (ROWD)
Technical Report Assistance. Prepared theROWD for land application of process waters and worked with the Regional Water Quality Control Board to obtain Waste Discharge Requirements.  Process engineer for the Quincy Community Services District, California, Regulatory Support. Provided regulatory assistance for permit compliance for the District, including preparation of a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation Workplan, Ammonia Compliance
Workplan, Antidegradation Analysis, and
Salinity Evaluation and Minimization Plan.
 Design engineer for the State of California Statewide Program Environmental Impact Report for Anaerobic Digestion Facilities for Dairy Waste. Responsible for preparing risk assessment.  Process engineer for field commissioning testing conducted on the City of Roseville, California, Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant’s 30-mgd ultraviolet (UV)
disinfection system. Testing was conducted
to demonstrate the performance of the system as observed during original validation testing in order to obtain approval from the
California Department of Public Health. This
approval would allow the UV disinfection
system to produce recycled water for unrestricted reuse applications.  Process engineer for field commissioning testing conducted on the City of Roseville, California, Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant’s 45-mgd ultraviolet disinfection system. Testing was conducted to demonstrate the performance of the system to obtain approval from the California Department of Public Health to produce recycled water for unrestricted reuse applications.
 Process engineer for the El Dorado Irrigation District, California, Deer Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant checkpoint bioassay testing conducted at the existing Ozonia Aquaray® 40HO ultraviolet (UV)
disinfection system. Testing was conducted
to quantify system performance at higher
UV light.
 Senior engineer for the State of Montana Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Effluent Reuse Program. Served as
DEQ’s technical representative. Responsiblefor providing procedural guidance to applicants in meeting state regulations to implement wastewater effluent reuse.

B:\Resumes\FCO\ReamBrian.docx
Education
Independent Electrical
Contractors Rocky
Mountain Electrical Trade
Career College, 1998
Licenses
Master Electrician,
Colorado
Certification
International Code
Council, Colorado
Professional
Affiliations
International Association
of Electrical Inspectors
Brian J. Ream
Brian Ream has 29 years of experience in the electrical industry for water and wastewater facilities. His recent experience includes project site inspections, constructability review, engineer cost estimates, and electrical, instrumentation and control designs.

Prior to joining Carollo, Mr. Ream managed the field operations for an electrical contractor. His experience includes business planning, staff development, master planning, design reviews, estimating, proposals, contracts, budgeting, schedules, electrical/ instrumentation, SCADA procurement and installations, commissioning, start-ups and client trainings.

Relevant Experience
 Electrical designer for the City of Aurora,
Colorado, Arc Flash Reduction Design. Project included electrical system study and design of new service entrance equipment at eleven remote sites.
 Electrical engineer cost estimator for the
City of Tacoma, Washington, Owner's Representative Treatment Plant System Upgrade. Services included upgrade/replacement of control system for the City’s Central Treatment Plant (CTP) and North End Treatment Plant (NETP). The core of the existing control system comprises an ABB System Six
distributed control system (DCS) with six
Distributed Control Units (DCUs) located at
the CTP and a single DCU located at the
NETP. Auxiliary control systems included
twelve PLCs that are interconnected to the
DCUs, eleven PLC’s that are stand-alone
systems, and approximately nineteen remote IO cabinets.  Electrical, instrumentation and controls
inspector for Metro Water Recovery, Colorado, PAR 1085 South Secondary Improvements Construction Services. Project included modifying and upgrading the South Secondary Treatment Facilities to treat 114
million gallons of wastewater per day. Project included design of electrical, instrumentation, and control elements for successful integration into facility SCADA system.
 Electrical, instrumentation, and controls
auditor for the Metro Water Recovery, Colorado, Owner's Advisor PAR 1088 Northern Treatment Plant Program Construction Services. The Owner’s Advisor assisted the District in the management of the 7-year Program for all planning, procurement, construction, and start-up services for the implementation of a 24-mgd advanced treatment facility, a 7-mile interceptor, and the 11-mile effluent pump back system. The
Owner’s Advisor was co-located with District
staff for the delivery of the $475-million Program. The Program includes the largest, constructed PDB project to date in the U.S.
water/wastewater industry, and has been
referenced by the Water Design-Build
Council and Design-Build Institute of America as an example for best value, qualifications-based procurement.  Electrical constructability reviewer, field
advisor and inspector for the construction of
new medium voltage underground electrical distribution infrastructure for the City of Tacoma, Washington, Central Treatment
Plant (CTP). This project included construction of a new switchgear building and replacement of CTP’s main 15 kilovolt service entrance switchgear. It also involved the replacement of other aging electrical assets at the plant
 Electrical designer for the City of Aurora,
Colorado, System Wide UPS Replacement
project. Tasks included field investigations,
workshops with client, and design of 43 remote pump station site UPS systems.  Electrical designer for the City of
Oceanside's Major Plant Automation Upgrades, Oceanside, California. Provided design assistance, software standards template development, control strategy review, and
cost estimating assistance.
 Electrical designer for the City of Aurora,
Colorado, Sand Creek Water Reclamation
Facility (WRF) Arc Flash Design. Project included electrical system study and design of Brian J. Ream
B:\Resumes\FCO\ReamBrian.docx
new electrical distribution equipment at four
locations at the Sand Creek WRF.
 Instrumentation and controls designer
and on-site inspector for the Metro Water
Recovery, Colorado, PAR 1225 South Headworks and Grease Process Improvements.

This work involved extensive modifications
to the existing screening, grit removal, and
grease processing facilities for the 100-mgd
South plant.
 Instrumentation designer for the City of
Aurora, Colorado, Second Creek Interceptor
Segment 1E Design. Project included a new
wastewater vault with flow metering and
communication equipment.
 Electrical engineer cost estimator for the
City of Fort Collins, Colorado, Electrical Master Plan.  Electrical engineer cost estimator for the
City of Fresno, California, Water Treatment
Design.
 Electrical engineer cost estimator for the
City of San Mateo, California, Wastewater
Treatment Plant PCS Design.
 Electrical engineer cost estimator for the
City of Salem's Willow Lake Water Pollution
Control Facility Gravity Thickeners/Sludge
Degritting Improvements, Salem, Oregon.
 Electrical engineer cost estimator for the
City of Longmont, Colorado, Sludge Control
Building Modifications.
 Electrical engineer cost estimator for the
Albuquerque Bernalillo County Water Utility,
New Mexico, SWRP MCC and Switchgear
Replacement. The project scope involved
replacement of critical 480V switchgear to
provide automatic transfer to the plants' existing 2MW generator. The scope also included the installation and interconnection of a new owner procured 4160V, 3MW generator, and the upgrade of an existing 480V switchgear to convert to automatic transfer
to a 750kW generator.
 Electrical inspector for the City of Edmond, Oklahoma, Coffee Creek Water Resource Recovery Facility Expansion. Carollo provided study, design, and construction
phase services for expansion of Edmond's
Water Resource Recovery Facility to treat an
average flow of 12 mgd (36 mgd peak) and
to meet upcoming nitrate and future phosphorus effluent limits. This is the first large permanent power generation facility for Edmond, so the study phase included evaluation of several generator types and utility connections.
 Electrical inspector for the City of Edmond, Oklahoma, Arcadia Lake Water Treatment Plant Expansion. Carollo performed a comprehensive condition assessment and, along with City staff, determined that the most cost-effective approach was
to construct a new 30-mgd treatment plant
then decommission the existing processes,
allowing their space to be used for the ultimate 65-mgd future expansion.  Electrical inspector for the City of Sioux
Falls, South Dakota, Water Reclamation Facility Expansion and Improvements. Carollo performed an electrical system and equipment evaluation to assess service equipment, backup generation, medium voltage distribution equipment and cables and process area low voltage equipment. Most existing plant equipment was 40 years old and had passed the expected useful age. Replacement alternatives were suggested for each process area based on equipment capacity, added loads, available space and detailed condition assessment. Value engineering was performed with the contractor to maximize equipment replacement benefit to meet the project budget.  Electrical, instrumentation and controls
inspector for the Metro Water Recovery,
Colorado, PAR 1247 Electrical Transformer
Replacement Project and PAR 1259 Digester
Complex Rehabilitation Project. Project included replacement of two 4.16 kV to 13.2 kV substation transformers with low resistance and zig-zag transformer grounding, two 13.2 kV to 480 V substation transformers with high resistance grounding, and a 480 V load center.

Education
BS Civil Engineering,
South Dakota School of
Mines and Technology,
1995
Licenses
Professional Engineer,
Colorado
S. Jason Rozgony, PE
Jason Rozgony has 29 years of experience specializing in cost estimating for water and wastewater treatment plants, pump stations, and distribution systems. He manages Carollo’s company-wide cost estimating standards and has extensive experience with Construction Manager at Risk delivery. Jason completed more than 150 cost estimates for design and fixed-price construction projects and successfully navigated large, unique, and complex change orders and provides independent estimates and support during the negotiation of requested changes to comply with contract documents.

Prior to his cost estimating experience, Jason worked as a project engineer, superintendent, and construction manager on a variety of water treatment and remediation projects in Illinois, Texas, Michigan, Iowa, Missouri, Connecticut, Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming. Since transitioning from a construction operations role to cost estimating, he and his teams have developed at-risk bids and guaranteed maximum price proposals exceeding $2 billion for water/wastewater treatment plant work while producing over 500 opinions of probable cost estimates.

Relevant Experience
 Cost estimator for the City of Oklahoma
City, Oklahoma, WC-1006 Water System
Hydraulic Evaluation Citywide. Carollo is
updating the City’s distribution system
model and performing a master plan. The
project team is performing modeling and
preliminary routing and connection analysis;
developing flushing and disinfection
practices for the Hefner-Draper Interconnect
project, developing water demand
projections, updating the hydraulic model
demands with recent billing data and
allocate future demand, calibrating the
model, evaluating the existing and future
system, and identifying improvements.
 Estimator for the City of Sunnyvale,
California, Water Pollution Control Plant
Secondary Treatment and Dewatering
Facilities Design. This project included
expanding the secondary treatment process
to a conventional activated sludge (CAS)
process, adding dewatering and thickening
facilities for sludge handling, and adding
sidestream ammonia treatment. The CAS
process will remove nitrogen in anticipation
of upcoming nutrient regulations in the San
Francisco Bay. Construction value estimated
at $50 million.
 Estimator for the City of Richmond,
California, Veolia Wastewater Treatment
Plant (WWTP) Critical Improvement project.

Carollo provided design and engineering
services during construction for Veolia
Water’s Critical Improvements to the
Richmond WWTP. The project included grit
removal, fine screen, and odor control
system upgrades at the headworks; aeration
basin diffuser improvements; secondary
effluent splitter box modifications; a new
blower building; and secondary clarifier
mechanism replacement for early
implementation of critical facility
components in parallel with the Facility Plan.

The construction value is estimated at $34
million.
 Estimator for the City of Odessa, Texas,
Water Quality Improvements – Phase III.

This 55-mgd surface water treatment
project included a new 20 mgd high rate
flocculation/sedimentation facility which
replaced existing facilities. This project
included the Water Treatment Plant
Rehabilitation and Miscellaneous Upgrades
in which Carollo conducted a process
evaluation to improve the water quality,
which has high levels of hardness and total
dissolved solids (TDS). The improvement
project includes structural rehabilitation,
new chemical and electrical facilities with
advanced water treatment in mind, citywide SCADA upgrades, and the construction of new plate settlers in lieu of
aging flocculation and sedimentation basins.

Construction value estimated at $154
million.

B:\Resumes\DNB\RozgonySJason.docx
S. Jason Rozgony, PE
 Cost estimator for the City of Aurora,
Colorado, North Campus Electrical Phase II.

In order to improve electrical safety and
standardize on control across the North
Campus Well Field, Carollo provided the
design for the electrical, control, and
programming replacement for 17 wells. This
included the separation of power from
control for arc flash safety and the reprogramming of each well to provide consistency across the wellfield as well as
the City. Control narratives were developed
to simplify and optimize operation based on
experience from historical production.
 QA/QC for the Metro Vancouver, British
Columbia, Canada, Northwest Langley
Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrade
Program. Carollo led an integrated Metro
Vancouver/Consultant team of over 50
design and construction professionals that
provided program management and
effective project delivery support for the
NLWWTP Program, a $2.3 billion group of
five major projects: pump station, SSO
storage tank, large-diameter HDD installed
force main, large-scale seismic ground
improvements, 85MLD WWTP, and river
outfall. Participated in a week-long Design
CAMP® process to identify cost reduction
measures to simplify and produce cost
effective savings without compromising
operations.
 Estimator for Pasco County Utilities,
Florida, Southeast Wastewater Treatment
Plant Expansion – Phase 1. The Phase 1
engineering services included a condition
assessment, process evaluation, capacity
analysis report, and facility plan for the
expansion and improvements of the
Southeast WWTP. The scope also included a
force main and route analysis for two force
mains coming into the plant.
 Estimator for the Eagle River Water and
Sanitation District, Colorado, Avon
Wastewater Treatment Facility Nutrient
Upgrades. This project included
improvements to the Avon Wastewater
Treatment Facility secondary treatment
process to meet Regulation 85 nutrient
limits. The recommended process
configuration included an
Anaerobic/Anoxic/Oxic (A2O) process with
flexibility to operate in the 5-Stage
Bardenpho configuration. Design elements
included expanded and modified aeration
basins, secondary pumping, a new
secondary clarifier, and condition
assessment improvements to screening, grit
removal, primary sedimentation, and
equalization basins. The project was
delivered via a CMAR delivery model to
include construction sequence and
constructability approach in the design
process. Construction value estimated at
$50 million.
 Estimator for the City of Kansas City,
Missouri, Blue River Wastewater Treatment
Plant Biosolids Upgrades. This project
includes the preliminary and conceptual
design of a new THP system and necessary
improvements for processing biosolids from
three of the City’s wastewater treatment
facilities. Project included providing
assistance to the City for procurement
strategy development, packaging
evaluations, development of preliminary
design of the THP system, comprehensive
evaluation of proposal submittals, and
negotiation of a long-term service contract.

Construction value estimated at $155
million.
 Estimator for the North Texas Municipal
Water District, Texas, South Mesquite
Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant Solids
Handling Improvements. The project
involved providing a new solids dewatering
facility to process solids for the current 33-
mgd plant capacity and including
consideration for future equipment to
process solids for the 41-mgd plant capacity.

Construction value estimated at $31 million.
 Cost estimator for the City of Aurora,
Colorado, Sand Creek WRF PLC Conversion
and Improvements. Provided cost
estimating support for the PLC conversion.

The project included redesign of the PLC
and SCADA infrastructure, including
network block diagram, control cabinet and
server rack design, P&IDs, control
descriptions redevelopment, and PLC and
SCADA hardware and software
specifications. Construction value estimated
at $2.6 million.

B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Resumes\Final Education
BS Mechanical
Engineering, University of
Texas, Arlington, 2009
Licenses
Professional Engineer,
Arkansas, Colorado,
District of Columbia,
Florida, Illinois, Kentucky,
Maryland, New Jersey,
New Mexico, New York,
North Dakota, Oklahoma
Oregon, Texas, Utah,
Virginia, Washington,
Georgia, Tennessee, Iowa,
North Carolina, South
Carolina, Wisconsin, New
Jersey
Mechanical Engineer,
Arizona, California,
Minnesota, Nebraska,
Nevada, South Dakota
Professional
Affiliations
American Society of
Heating, Refrigeration,
and Air Conditioning
Engineers
Chad A. Green, PE
Chad Green, an associate vice president and principal building mechanical engineer, has 15 years of engineering experience. He manages Carollo’s Building Services Group and supervises all aspects of design services and quality control related to building mechanical services. He has extensive knowledge and experience with designing heating, ventilation, air conditioning, controls, refrigeration systems, plumbing systems, fire protection systems, odor treatment, and fuel systems. His knowledge and experience are used to develop both client standards and corporate standards. He has an in-depth background performing generator system designs and planning for water facilities and is well-known for developing innovative recommendations for facility upgrades and design options.

Relevant Experience
 0138 Draper Water Treatment Plant
Power Generation Facilities, City of
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Carollo provided
HVAC/plumbing for the new power
generation facility, which featured a
switchgear room, motor control center
room, battery room, control room,
generator room, storage room, and urea
storage tank room. This project team also
installed three 2.75-MW Tier 4 generators.

Oversaw the mechanical designs for aftertreatment exhaust systems, fuel systems, urea systems, and compressed air system
design.
 Lead building mechanical engineer for
the Sobrante Water Treatment Plant Ozone
Systems Improvements, East Bay Municipal
Utility District, California. The scope
consisted of the existing ozone generation
building and ozone destruct building. The
ozone generation building included an
ozone generation room, cooling pump
room, air prep room, public gallery,
switchgear room, control room, PSU room,
and storage rooms. The project also
included fire protection design, calculations,
and code reviews for the ozone generation
building.
 Lead building mechanical engineer for
the Upper San Leandro Water Treatment
Plant Ozone Systems Improvements, East
Bay Municipal Utility District, California.

HVAC improvements were completed at the
existing ozone generation building and
ozone destruct building. The ozone
generation building included an ozone
generation room, cooling pump room, air
prep room, public gallery, switchgear room,
control room, PSU room, and storage
rooms. The improvements involved fire
protection design, calculations, and code
reviews for the ozone generation building.
 Lead building mechanical engineer for
the Draper Water Treatment Plant High
Auxiliary Pump Station Yard Piping and
Hydraulics, City of Oklahoma City,
Oklahoma. This new pump station project
included the design of a pump room, surge
tank room, variable frequency drive room,
motor control center room, switchgear
room, control room, battery room, storage
room, and restroom.
 Lead building mechanical engineer for
the Big Cottonwood Water Treatment Plant
Flocculation/Sedimentation Basin Rebuild
Design and Construction Management, Salt
Lake City Public Utilities, Utah. The HVAC
components of the project were completed
at the flash mix/flocculation/sedimentation
superstructure and new main electrical
building that houses a new generator.

Oversaw the HVAC group for plumbing and
generator fuel system designs, calculations,
code reviews, drawings, specifications, and
construction phase services.
 Lead building mechanical engineer for
the Bee Ridge Water Reclamation Facility
Expansion and Conversion to Advanced
Water Treatment, Sarasota County
Environmental Services, Florida. The project
scope consisted of a headworks, generator
building, membrane bioreactor (MBR)
basins, biological nutrient removal (BNR)
basins, blower building, electrical buildings,
operations building, visitor/security building,
Chad A. Green, PE
B:\Pursuits\Client84(SAC)\Roseville\PGWWTPElectricalExpansion\Prop0724\Resumes\Final and chemical buildings. The scope also
included the design of diesel fuel systems,
combustion, radiator intake/discharge with
sound mitigation measures. This project
involved the application of NFPA 820
standards.
 Lead building mechanical engineer for
the Arcadia Lake Water Treatment Plant
Expansion, City of Edmond, Oklahoma. The
HVAC scope consisted of a filter building,
pre-ozone building, ozone generation
building, post-ozone contactor building,
granular activated carbon building, chemical
building, lime building, recycle pump
station, thickened sludge pump station,
dewatering building, high lift pump station,
low lift pump station, and generator
building. Geothermal ground-source
cooling was utilized on this project for all
cooling and heating of facilities. The project
team also provided fire protection designs
for the pre-ozone building, ozone
generation building, post-ozone contactor
building, chemical building, and lime
building.
 Lead building mechanical engineer for
the Water Quality Control Plant Electrical
Motor Control Center Replacement, City of
Simi Valley, California. Led the HVAC designs
for the blower building and headworks.
 Lead building mechanical engineer for
the Cogeneration Building Structural Repair,
Encina Wastewater Authority, California.

Carollo provided repair designs for the
existing cogeneration building and
screening room.
 Lead building mechanical engineer for
the Roberto R. Bustamante Wastewater
Treatment Plant Headworks Improvements,
El Paso Water, Texas. This project involves a
new influent pump station, headworks,
electrical building, existing grit facility, and
foul air duct routing.
 Lead building mechanical engineer for
the Southwest Water Treatment Plant Ion
Exchange System and Improvements, City of
Sunrise, Florida. Provided HVAC calculations,
designs, code reviews, drawings, and
construction services for the generator
room.
 Lead building mechanical engineer for
the Paul M. Neal Water Treatment Plant
Ozone System Replacement, Central Lake
County Joint Action Water Agency, Illinois.

Provided HVAC calculations, designs, code
reviews, drawings, and construction services
for the ozone generator room and VSA
gallery.
 Project manager for the David L. Tippin
Water Treatment Plant Master Plan
Improvements Design-Build, TO-11 Electrical
and Site Improvements, City of Tampa,
Florida. This task order encompassed the
design of a new TECO House Building and
new standby generators with support
appurtenances, including a fuel storage and
feed area, diesel exhaust fluid system,
electrical room, and sitewide ductbanks.
 Lead building mechanical engineer for
the David L. Tippin Water Master Plan
Improvements Design-Build, TO-10 Ozone
Improvements, City of Tampa, Florida. This
task order includes the design of a new
TECO House Building and new standby
generators with support appurtenances,
made up of a fuel storage and feed area,
diesel exhaust fluid system, electrical room,
and sitewide ductbanks.
 Technical Advisor for the Joseph Blake
Water Treatment Plant Phase 1B
Improvements , Centennial Water and
Sanitation District, Colorado. This project
included a new chemical building with
sodium hypochlorite, sodium hydroxide,
coagulation aid polymer, ferric sulfate,
ammonium sulfate, sodium permanganate,
flocculation aid polymer,
mechanical/electrical rooms, and new utility
corridor to the existing pretreatment
building. Modifications also included
updating HVAC systems at portions of the
pretreatment building.
 Technical Advisor for the WT-0253
Draper Water Treatment Plant Existing High
Service Pump Station (HSPS) Electrical
Improvements, City of Oklahoma City,
Oklahoma. The project included adding a
new water source heat pump unit in the
existing auxiliary HSPS building.
carollo.com

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 3689
File #: 0400-04-13-1 & 1002-06
Title: Creekview Ranch Subdivision - Summary Vacation of Water Channel Easement Contact: Shelby Maples 916-746-1347 [email protected] Meeting Date: 12/18/2024
Item #: 7.21.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff requests that the City Council adopt a resolution to summarily vacate the Water Channel Easement.

BACKGROUND
The project site is located in unincorporated Placer County on a parcel with APN 474-100-001, on the north side of PFE Rd., abutting the City boundary at the northeast corner of the parcel. This property is identified as a future subdivision known as Creekview Ranch. A portion of Lower Dry Creek is located within the northern portion of the parcel, and the City currently possesses an easement to access the water channel. The easement, dedicated to the City by the Schellhous family in 1962 (Resolution 66-22) is isolated to the northeast corner of the parcel, and connects to City-owned property at 1800 Booth Rd. (The Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Facility). The easement is approximately 565 feet long and 125 feet wide and covers a portion of Lower Dry Creek.

The current request includes the abandonment of the 125-wide easement for the water channel.

The project will also include the dedication of a revised access easement, though that action does not require Council approval.

Government Code Section 8300 et. seq. (Streets and Highways Code) states that an easement may be terminated (vacated) by adopting a resolution of vacation. There are two pathways for vacation: summary or general. An abandonment request for an easement is eligible for the simpler summary vacation when any one of the three potential conditions applies:
1) The easement has not been used for the purpose for which it was dedicated or acquired or five consecutive years immediately preceding the proposed abandonment, 2) The easement has been in place for less than five years (making it ineligible for condition 1 above), but has been in place for at least a year and has not been used for the purpose for which it was dedicated or acquired, or
3) The need for the easement has been superseded by relocation, and there are no other public facilities in the easement.

The existing easement for the water channel will be superseded by relocation, meeting the third condition above. No public facilities are located in the existing easement. The proposed easement vacation was routed to all utilities which could be affected by the project, and no objections were received. For these reasons, staff concludes that Condition 3 (as described above) for a summary vacation applies, and recommends approval of the vacation request.

FISCAL IMPACT
There will be no fiscal impact to the City of Roseville.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15305. The proposed project involves minor alteration in land use limitations in areas with an average slope of less than 20%, which do not result in any changes in land use or density. The project is not located in a particularly sensitive environment, and therefore no further CEQA action is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Shelby Maples, Associate Planner
Mike Isom, Development Services Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Vicinity Map
Resolution 24-426
Exemption
PL24-0826 – 1800 Booth Rd -- Vicinity Map
Easement
Location
Subject Parcel
RESOLUTION NO. 24-426

ORDERING SUMMARY VACATION OF A WATER CHANNEL EASEMENT ON PARCEL WITH APN 474-100-001, LOCATED IN UNINCORPORATED PLACER COUNTY, ADJACENT TO 1800 BOOTH ROAD
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of section 8330, et seq., of the Streets and Highways Code (Chapter 4, Summary Vacation), it is hereby found that a water channel easement APN 474-100-001 in unincorporated Placer County, described in Exhibit “A” and depicted in Exhibit “B”, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, is no longer needed; and WHEREAS, the need for the easement has been superseded by relocation, and there are no other public facilities in the easement; and
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. That the public utility easement at APN 474-100-001 described in Exhibit “A” and depicted in Exhibit “B” is hereby vacated pursuant to Streets and Highways Code section 8335, and shall, as of the date of adoption of this resolution, no longer constitute a water channel easement; and

2. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute any other documents required to effectuate the conveyance of the abandoned/vacated easement to the respective property owners; and

3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a certified copy of this Resolution and Order, attested to by said Clerk under the seal of the City of Roseville, to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder, and take any other actions necessary to effectuate the intent of this Resolution and Order.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this 18th day of December 2024, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
_________________________________
MAYOR
____________________________
City Clerk
Exhibit A – Legal Description
All that real property in the County of Placer, State of California, described as follows:

All that portion of the Southeast quarter of Section 9, Township 10 North, Range 6 East, M.D.B. & M., described as follows:

Beginning at the quarter corner common to Sections 9 and 10, Township 10 North, Range 6 East, M.D.B. & M.; thence West 1100 feet; thence South 836 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing South 175 feet; thence North 76° 15’ West 565 feet; thence North 13° 45’ East 125 feet; thence South 76° 15’ East 339.57 feet; thence East 189.26 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.

Bearings refer to E line of Section 9 which is North and South.

EXHIBIT B
Notice of Exemption
To: Placer County Clerk From: City of Roseville
Recorder’s Office Development Services Dept.
2954 Richardson Drive 311 Vernon Street
Auburn, CA 95603 Roseville, CA 95678
Project Title: Creekview Ranch Subdivision – Vacation of Water Channel Easement Project Location: An easement within an approximately 141-acre parcel located within unincorporated Placer County (APN 474-100-001), adjacent to the Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant (DCWWTP) located at 1800 Booth Road, Roseville, CA 95747.

Project Description: Development Services staff requests approval of the summary vacation for a portion of the water channel easement on APN 474-100-001 in unincorporated Placer County to allow for relocation of the easement and facilitate future development of the parcel. This property is identified as a future subdivision known as Creekview Ranch. A portion of Lower Dry Creek is located within the northern portion of the parcel, and the City currently possesses an easement located in the northeast corner of the parcel adjacent to the DCWWTP property. The project meets Streets and Highways Code criteria, allowing termination of an easement, as the easement will be superseded by relocation, and there are no public facilities located in the easement.

Public Agency Approving Project: Roseville City Council Agency/Individual Carrying Out Project: City of Roseville Development Services Department
Reason why this Project is Exempt: This project qualifies for a Class 5 exemption as described in Section 15305 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines which states:
“Class 5 consists of minor alterations in land use limitations in areas with an average slope of less than 20%, which do not result in any changes in land use or density…”
The proposed summary vacation is consistent with the above criteria, and therefore a Class 5 exemption applies to the project.

Lead Agency Contact Person: Shelby Maples, Development Services Department, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, CA 95678. (916) 746-1347.

Signature: Date: 12/6/2024
Jessica Lynch, Environmental Coordinator
City of Roseville

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 3667
File #: 0709
Title: Parcel F-22, The Crawford - Affordable Rental Housing Agreement Contact: Suzanne Acrell 916-774-5469 [email protected] Meeting Date: 12/18/2024
Item #: 7.22.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve an Affordable Rental Housing Agreement for an affordable housing project with Roseville Harvey 715, L.P., and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement.

BACKGROUND
On April 21, 2021, City Council adopted a resolution to establish the Objective Design Standards (ODS) to streamline the construction of qualified affordable housing projects. The ODS were adopted in order to comply with State housing legislation. Qualified projects that comply with the ODS are subject to a non-discretionary ministerial permit process and can bypass the standard design review process as well as the public notification and hearing process and proceed directly to engineering and building permit review. A qualifying project is a housing development project where no less than 20% of the units are affordable to lower-income households.

On June 19, 2024, the City ministerially approved an affordable housing project located at 5251 Fiddyment Road in the West Roseville Specific Plan, using the Objective Design Standards process. Parcel F-22 project, known as The Crawford and developed by USA Properties, will include two hundred sixty-five (265) units, with 262 affordable units. The affordable units will be broken down as follows, 27 units at extremely low- (30% Area Median Income), 64 units at very low- (50% Area Median Income), and 171 at low-income (60% to 80% Area Median Income). The three market rate units will be reserved for use by on-site management staff.

The West Roseville Specific Plan Development Agreement requires development of 91 units for very low-income (50% of AMI and below) and 93 units for low-income (80% of AMI and below) households. The Affordable Rental Housing Agreement will ensure these requirements are met.

The remaining 81 units developed in this project will be rented to low-income (80% of AMI and below) households, but will not be regulated by this agreement.

The purpose of this agreement is to regulate and restrict the occupancy, rents, operation, ownership, and management of the project for the benefit of the occupants and residence. These affordable units will serve a range of local housing needs, including members of the local workforce, families, young couples, single households, and seniors with low and very low incomes. Workers in these units could hold jobs ranging from employment in the service industry, local teachers, office assistants, custodians, store clerks, and others who are likely to have job opportunities in Roseville. The recommended agreement before Council will continue to support the City's General Plan in meeting the City of Roseville affordable housing goals.

FISCAL IMPACT
No General Fund resources will be used for the implementation of the Affordable Rental Housing Agreement for The Crawford, a USA Properties’ affordable rental housing project.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of an Affordable Renting Housing Agreement meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community
Respectfully Submitted,
Suzanne Acrell, Housing Analyst
Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 24-404
F-22 The CrawfordARHA
RESOLUTION NO. 24-404

APPROVING AN AFFORDABLE RENTAL HOUSING AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND ROSEVILLE HARVEY 715, LP, AND AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE WHEREAS, an Affordable Rental Housing Agreement regarding the real property located at 5251 Fiddyment Road in the West Roseville Specific Plan, Roseville, CA (The Crawford), by and between the City of Roseville and Roseville Harvey 715, LP, has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Affordable Rental Housing Agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby directed to record the Affordable Rental Housing Agreement at the Placer County Recorder’s Office on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2024, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

NO FEE DOCUMENT
PER GOVT. C. §27383

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED, MAIL TO:

City of Roseville
CITY Clerk
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678

AFFORDABLE RENTAL HOUSING AGREEMENT
(Project: The Crawford – Harvey Way)
This Affordable Rental Housing Agreement (“AGREEMENT”) is made this _____ day of __________, 2024 (“Effective Date”), by and between the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation (“CITY”), and Roseville Harvey 715, L.P., a California limited partnership (“OWNER/DEVELOPER”).

RECITALS
A. On August 18, 2021, CITY approved the updated Housing Element of the General Plan which applies ten percent (10%) affordability requirement to all new specific plan areas or properties for which zoning is amended to change residential density.

B. The OWNER/DEVELOPER is receiving the benefit of land entitlements either through the Specific Plan and Development Agreement process or by amendment of the zoning of the property to change residential density.

C. On June 19, 2024, CITY ministerially approved the qualified affordable housing project using the Objective Design Standards process (PL23-0360) (the “Project”).

D. The conditions of approval of the Project require OWNER/DEVELOPER to enter into an affordable housing rental agreement to the satisfaction of City Attorney of CITY, implementing the affordable housing obligations of OWNER/DEVELOPER.

E. OWNER/DEVELOPER and CITY enter into this AGREEMENT in order to implement OWNER/DEVELOPER’S affordable housing obligations.

F. OWNER/DEVELOPER has secured the possession of real property located at 1130 Harvey Way, Roseville, California, 95747, also referred to as Parcel F22 of the West Roseville Specific Plan (as more particularly described in Exhibit A (the “Property”)). OWNER/DEVELOPER proposes to develop and construct a two hundred sixty-five (265) unit multi-family rental housing apartment project (the “Project”) on the Property, a portion of which shall be rented at rents that are affordable to Low and Very Low-income households (the “Regulated Units”) as set forth herein. The Project is intended to serve as a community resource by providing decent, safe, and sanitary housing for households which would otherwise be unable to afford such housing.

Development of the property is governed by the West Roseville Specific Plan.

G. OWNER/DEVELOPER intends to transfer the fee interest in the Property to Safehold Inc. or an affiliate thereof (“Ground Lessor”), and Ground Lessor intends to concurrently ground lease the leasehold interest in the Property to OWNER/DEVELOPER pursuant to a certain ground lease agreement ("Ground Lease”).

H. On November 6, 2024, by Resolution No. 24-379 of the Roseville CITY Council, the CITY agreed to the deferral of certain development impact fees related to construction of the Project in the approximate amount of five million, nine-hundred six thousand, five-hundred eighty-five dollars ($5,906,585) for building permit final/certificate of occupancy permit.

I. The purpose of this AGREEMENT is to regulate and restrict the occupancy, rents, operation, ownership, and management of the Project for the benefit of Project occupants and the people of the City of Roseville.

The covenants in this AGREEMENT are intended to run with the land and be binding on OWNER/DEVELOPER and OWNER/DEVELOPER’s
successors in interest for the full term of this AGREEMENT.

NOW, THEREFORE, OWNER/DEVELOPER and the CITY hereby agree as follows:

DEFINITIONS
The following terms have the meanings set forth in herein wherever used in this AGREEMENT or attached exhibits.

1. “CITY” means the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation.

2. “AREA MEDIAN INCOME” (referred to herein as “AMI”) means the median income for Placer County, which includes the City of Roseville, with adjustments for household size, as published annually by the State of California Housing and Community Development (“HCD”). If HCD should cease making such determination, the City may designate another method of calculation of area median income used by any federal or state agency and applicable to the City of Roseville.

3. “OWNER/DEVELOPER” means Roseville Harvey 715, L.P., a California limited partnership, together with its permitted successors and assigns.

4. “PROJECT” means the development, construction and operation of a residential, multi-family rental apartment project on the Property, to be rented at rents that are affordable to Low and Very Low income households.

5. “PROPERTY” means the real property located at 1130 Harvey Way, Roseville, California, 95747 identified and described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated into this AGREEMENT by this reference, and any buildings or improvements now or hereafter situated on such real property.

6. “QUALIFYING HOUSEHOLD” means a household in which household income does not exceed the percentage of Area Median Income prescribed for the applicable housing unit by the terms of this AGREEMENT.

7. “QUALIFYING RENT” means the maximum monthly rent allowed under Exhibit B “adjusted for family size appropriate to the unit” (as such term is defined by the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee – currently 1.5 persons per bedroom) including a reasonable allowance for tenant-paid utilities (also known as Utility Allowance). During the period a regulatory agreement governing the allocation and award of any federal tax credits is in effect, Qualifying Rent may be determined in accordance with such regulatory agreement and 26 U.S.C., Section 42.

8. “REGULATED UNITS” means one hundred eighty-four (184) rental dwelling units of the two hundred sixty-five (265) rental dwelling units on the Property constructed for the Project, (if applicable), that shall be rented at rents that are affordable to Low and Very Low income households and having the following composition: forty-six (46) one (1) bedroom units, ninety-two (92) two (2) bedroom units, and forty-six (46) three (3) bedroom units.

9. “SENIOR LENDERS” means the lenders of a construction or permanent loan on the Property and their successors and assigns.

OWNER/DEVELOPER’S OBLIGATIONS

10. TERM OF AGREEMENT. This AGREEMENT shall commence upon the Effective Date and shall remain in full force and effect for fifty-five (55) years after the date OWNER/DEVELOPER obtains a Certificate of Occupancy from CITY for the Project or, in the event the Project has multiple buildings or structures, a Certificate of Occupancy for the last habitable building or structure for the Project. The obligations in this AGREEMENT shall remain effective and fully binding on OWNER/DEVELOPER for this full term regardless of any expiration of the term of any loan, any payment, or prepayment of any loan, any assignment of a note, any reconveyance of a deed of trust, or any sale, assignment, transfer, or conveyance of the Property (other than certain transfers by foreclosure, deed in lieu of foreclosure, exercise of the power of sale or other similar transfer), unless terminated earlier by the CITY in a recorded writing.

11. LEGAL INTEREST IN PROJECT. OWNER/DEVELOPER represents that is has legal interest in the Subject Property and that all other persons holding legal or equitable interests in the Subject Property have signed an “Acknowledgement and Consent Certificate”, in a form approved by the City Attorney of the CITY, acknowledging and consenting to the terms of this AGREEMENT. All persons holding any legal or equitable interest in the Subject Property shall be bound by this AGREEMENT.

PROJECT OCCUPANCY AND RENTS

12. OCCUPANCY OF PROJECT. OWNER/DEVELOPER shall limit, for the full term of this AGREEMENT identified in paragraph 8., above, the rental of Regulated Units to Qualifying Households according to the schedule contained in Exhibit B herein, which is hereby incorporated by reference into this AGREEMENT. The income levels and other qualifications of applicants shall be certified prior to initial occupancy in conformance with the Final Management Plan identified in paragraph 18 below, and the City of Roseville’s rules governing income certification, as these rules may be amended from time to time by California law or as required in order to comply with California law.

Specifically, OWNER/DEVELOPER covenants and agrees that for the full term of this Agreement it shall reserve for occupancy: (i) twenty-two (22) one-bedroom, forty-six (46) two-bedroom, and twenty-three (23) three-bedroom Regulated Units for households whose income does not exceed fifty percent (50%) of AMI (a “Very Low Income Household”), and (ii) twenty-four (24) one-bedroom, forty-six (46) two-bedroom, and twenty-three (23) three-bedroom Regulated Units for households whose income does not exceed eighty percent (80%) of AMI (a “Low Income Household”). Three (3) of the remaining eighty-one (81) unregulated units shall be two (2) two-bedroom units and one (1) three-bedroom unit reserved for use by on-site Project management staff.

The Project shall be owned, managed and operated as a single, multifamily residential rental project, which may be comprised of several buildings and structures, each consisting of more than one residential dwelling unit, together with facilities functionally related and subordinate thereto, in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and applicable California law, as the same may be amended from time to time. All of the residential dwelling units in the Project will be similarly constructed and shall contain separate and complete facilities for living, sleeping, eating, cooking and sanitation for a single person or family, including sleeping area, bathing and sanitation facilities and cooking facilities equipped with a cooking range, refrigerator and sink. None of the residential dwelling units shall be utilized, at any time, on a transient basis. Neither the Project, nor any portion thereof, shall ever be used as a hotel, dormitory, fraternity house, sorority house, rooming house, hospital, nursing home, sanitarium, rest home or trailer park or court.

13. PROJECT RENTS. Rents for Regulated Units shall be limited to Qualifying Rents as set forth in Exhibit B as the same may be revised from time to time in accordance with this AGREEMENT and applicable federal or state laws and regulations. Rent shall be no greater than considered “affordable rent” for the applicable household pursuant to Section 50053 of the California Health and Safety Code, as amended, or any successor statute thereto. Nothing in this AGREEMENT shall prevent OWNER/DEVELOPER from charging lower rents.

14. RENTAL INCREASES FOR EXISTING TENANTS ON THE PROPERTY.

Irrespective of when income limits are published under Tax Credit Law, rents for Regulated Units may be adjusted no more frequently than: (a) twelve (12) months following the date of initial occupancy or (b) every twelve (12) months following the last permissible date of recorded rental adjustment. Rents for Regulated Units may be adjusted annually to coincide with the increases in the Annual Adjustment Factors (“AAFs”) as published by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for the West Region, however, in no event shall rents exceed the amount permitted under the Tax Credit Law.

In the event that HUD terminates publication of the AAFs, rents shall be adjusted annually to coincide with the State Department of Housing and Community Development (“HCD”) State Income Limits, using the limits established for Placer County, adjusted for household size, unit type and affordability.

If OWNER/DEVELOPER does not agree with the adjustment factors provided herein, OWNER/DEVELOPER may, within fifteen (15) calendar days of notification by the CITY’s Economic Development Director or successor (“the EDD”) of that year’s adjustment, present to the EDD information on which it wishes to base its annual rent adjustment. The EDD will review this information and decide on which adjustment factor OWNER/DEVELOPER shall base its annual rent increase. The decision of the EDD shall be final.

15. CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION PROHIBITED. OWNER/DEVELOPER
shall not convert Project units, including Regulated Units and/or any unregulated units, to condominium or cooperative ownership or sell condominium or cooperative conversion rights to the Project units.

16. NONDISCRIMINATION.

A. OWNER/DEVELOPER herein covenants by and for itself, its subcontractors, its successors and assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, nor denial of the benefits of this AGREEMENT to, any person or group of persons, on the basis of race, color, ancestry, national origin or ethnic group identification, religion or religious creed, sex, gender or self-identified gender, gender expression, sexual orientation, marital status, age, mental disability, physical disability or medical condition (including cancer, HIV and AIDS), genetic information, military or veteran status, familial status, source of income, or political affiliation or belief, nor any unlawful discrimination against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, ancestry, national origin or ethnic group identification, religion or religious creed, sex, gender or self-identified gender, gender expression, sexual orientation, marital status, age (over 40), mental disability, physical disability or medical condition (including cancer, HIV and AIDS), use of family care leave, genetic information, military or veteran status, familial status, source of income, or political affiliation or belief. OWNER/DEVELOPER shall ensure that the evaluation and treatment of employees and applicants for employment are free of such discrimination or harassment. In addition to the foregoing general obligations, OWNER/DEVELOPER shall comply with the provisions of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Government Code Section 12900, et seq.), the regulations promulgated thereunder (Title 2, California Code of Regulations, Section 10000, et seq.), the provisions of Article 9.5, Chapter 1, Part 1, Division 3, Title 2 of the Government Code (Sections 11135-11139.5) and any state or local regulations adopted to implement any of the foregoing, as such statutes and regulations may be amended from time to time.

To the extent this AGREEMENT subcontracts to OWNER/DEVELOPER services or works required of the CITY by the State of California pursuant to agreement between the CITY and the State, the applicable regulations of the Fair Employment and Housing Commission implementing Government Code Section 12990 (a) through (f), set forth in Subchapter 5 of Division 4.1 of Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations are expressly incorporated into this Regulatory Agreement by reference and made a part hereof as if set forth in full, and OWNER/DEVELOPER and any of its subcontractors shall give written notice of their obligations thereunder to labor organizations with which they have collective bargaining or other agreements.

B. The provisions of paragraph (A) shall further apply to the leasing, subleasing, transferring, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the Project, and OWNER/DEVELOPER and any person claiming under or through the OWNER/DEVELOPER, shall not establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, sublessees, subtenants, or vendees in the Project.

C. OWNER/DEVELOPER shall include the provisions contained in this section in all contracts and subcontracts related to the Project.

17. MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES. OWNER/DEVELOPER is
specifically responsible, subject to its obligations herein, for all management functions with respect to the Property, including, without limitation, the selection of tenants, certification and recertification of household size and income, evictions, collection of rents and deposits, maintenance, landscaping, routine and extraordinary repairs, replacement of capital items, and security. The CITY shall have no responsibility over management of the Property.

18. MANAGEMENT ENTITY. The CITY shall have the right to review and approve the management entity chosen by OWNER/DEVELOPER for the Property and, with the prior written consent of the Senior Lenders, Ground Lessor, and the tax credit investor (if applicable), shall have the right to require a change in the management agent for the Project in the event OWNER/DEVELOPER is in default under the AGREEMENT. Any contracting of management services by OWNER/DEVELOPER shall not relieve OWNER/DEVELOPER of its primary responsibilities for proper performance of management duties. The CITY approves of the use of USA Multifamily Management, Inc., a California corporation, engaged in the provision of multi-family residential and commercial property management services, as the designated initial management entity for the Project.
19 DRAFT AND FINAL MANAGEMENT PLANS.

A. DRAFT MANAGEMENT PLAN. OWNER/DEVELOPER shall prepare and submit to CITY a Draft Management Plan for CITY’s review and approval. The Draft Management Plan shall be submitted to CITY at least one hundred eighty (180) calendar days prior to the anticipated date for completion of construction of the Project.

The Draft Management Plan shall contain, but is not limited to, specific statement as to (1) the identity, experience and duties regarding operation of the Project of any nonprofit, public benefit corporation who is a partner of OWNER/DEVELOPER; (2) marketing policies and strategies; (3) tenancy occupancy rules and regulations; (4) rental procedures and tenant income limitation; (5) eviction procedures; (6) operating policies and guidelines; (7) reserve account policies; (8) maintenance and capital improvement policies; and (9) shall provide as an exhibit thereto a sample form of lease agreement. Other than pursuant to the Ground Lease, or in connection with a foreclosure, deed in lieu of foreclosure, or other remedial action lawfully taken by any Senior Lender holding a security interest in the Property, upon transfer of the Project of OWNER/DEVELOPER’S interest in the Project, the party to who the Project is transferred shall, as a condition of such transfer, provide CITY with a copy of such party’s Management Plan for the Project, which plan shall provide statements as called for herein.

B. CITY REVIEW OF DRAFT MANAGEMENT PLAN. Upon submittal of the Draft Management Plan by OWNER/DEVELOPER to CITY the CITY shall review the Draft Management Plan and provide written comments to OWNER/DEVELOPER within ninety (90) calendar days or as soon thereafter as is practicable.

C. FINAL MANAGEMENT PLAN. Prior to issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy for the Project, OWNER/DEVELOPER shall submit a Final Management Plan to the CITY for its review and final approval no later than thirty (30) calendar days prior to the anticipated date for completion of construction of the Project.

Notwithstanding the foregoing and subject to the rights of Senior Lenders and Ground Lessor, the CITY shall have the right to review and approve any proposed amendments to OWNER/DEVELOPER’s contract with its management firm, or any new management contracts, during the term of this AGREEMENT; provided, however, that the CITY’s approval shall not be required for a renewal of the initial management contract.

20. MANAGEMENT AGENT. The Project shall at all times be managed by an experienced Management Agent reasonably acceptable to CITY, with demonstrated ability to operate residential facilities like the Project in a manner that will provide decent, safe and sanitary housing. During the monitoring as described in Section 26, CITY will assess Management Agent’s ability to operate the Project in a decent, safe and sanitary manner. One factor CITY will use to make its assessment will be a comparison of calls for police and fire services with other senior (if applicable) rental complexes in Roseville which offer similar services.

OWNER/DEVELOPER shall submit for CITY’s approval the identity of any proposed Management Agent. OWNER/DEVELOPER shall also submit such additional information about the background, experience, and financial condition of any proposed Management Agent as is reasonably necessary for CITY to determine whether the proposed Management Agent meets the standards for a qualified Management Agent set forth above.

If the proposed Management Agent meets the standards for a qualified Management Agent set forth above, CITY shall approve the proposed Management Agent by notifying OWNER/DEVELOPER in writing. Unless the proposed Management Agent is disapproved by CITY within thirty (30) days of said submission of identity and qualifications of proposed Management Agent, which disapproval shall state reasonable specificity the basis for disapproval it shall be deemed approved. USA Multifamily Management, Inc., a California corporation is hereby approved by the CITY as the initial Management Agent.

21. DISMISSAL OF MANAGEMENT AGENT. If CITY determines in its reasonable judgment that the Project is not being operated and managed in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, CITY shall deliver notice to OWNER/DEVELOPER of its intention to cause replacement of the Management Agent, including the reasons therefor, subject to the rights of Senior Lenders and Ground Lessor. Within fifteen (15) days of receipt by OWNER/DEVELOPER of such written notice, CITY staff and OWNER/DEVELOPER shall meet in good faith to consider methods for improving the operating status of the Project, including, without limitation, replacement of the Management Agent, which will be in OWNER/DEVELOPER’s discretion subject to the rights of Senior Lenders and Ground Lessor.

22. MAINTENANCE AND SECURITY. OWNER/DEVELOPER shall at its own cost and expense maintain the Property in good condition, in good repair, and in decent, safe, sanitary, habitable, and tenantable living condition for the benefit of Project occupants. OWNER/DEVELOPER shall not commit or permit any waste on or to the Property, and shall prevent and/or rectify any physical deterioration of the Property. OWNER/DEVELOPER shall provide adequate ongoing security equipment and services for Project occupants. OWNER/DEVELOPER shall maintain the Property in conformance with all applicable state, federal, and local laws, ordinances, codes, and regulations and the Management Plan; but OWNER/DEVELOPER’s maintenance obligations shall not be limited only to the standards contained in these laws or the Management Plan.

In the event the OWNER/DEVELOPER fails to maintain the Property in accordance with the foregoing standards, and after at least seven (7) calendar days’ prior written notice to OWNER/DEVELOPER, Ground Lessor, and the Senior Lenders, the CITY or its agent may, but shall be under no obligation to, enter upon the Property, make such repairs or replacements as are deemed necessary in CITY’s reasonable discretion (with the prior written consent of the Senior Lenders and the Ground Lessor), and provide for payment thereof. Any amount advanced by CITY to make such repairs, together with the maximum legal interest rate thereon from the date of such shall become an additional obligation of OWNER/DEVELOPER to CITY shall be immediately due and payable to CITY.

23. UNIT VACANCIES. OWNER/DEVELOPER shall use its best efforts to fill vacancies in Regulated Units as quickly as possible.
24 INSPECTION AND RECORDS. OWNER/DEVELOPER shall maintain records which clearly document OWNER/DEVELOPER’s performance of its obligations to operate the Property and the Project under the terms of this AGREEMENT.

OWNER/DEVELOPER shall submit any records to the CITY within ten (10) business days of CITY’s request. OWNER/DEVELOPER shall permit CITY to enter and inspect the Property and the Project for compliance with obligations under this AGREEMENT upon twenty-four (24) hours advance notice of such visit by CITY to OWNER/DEVELOPER or OWNER/DEVELOPER’s management agent and to tenants of any inspected Project units, subject to the provisions of the lease regarding inspection and entry rights, which provisions must otherwise be consistent with state law.

25. ANNUAL REPORT. OWNER/DEVELOPER shall submit an annual report to CITY as required by California Health and Safety Code Section 33418, which shall include at a minimum for each Regulated Unit the rental rate and the income and household size of the occupants. The income information required under this report shall be supplied by the tenant in a certified statement on a form provided by CITY.

CITY may request additional information be included in the annual report.

26. MONITORING/NON-COMPLIANCE/CURE. OWNER/DEVELOPER’S
compliance with the provisions of this AGREEMENT shall be reviewed at least annually, and at such other times as CITY may require, upon thirty (30) days prior written notice from CITY. During any such review, OWNER/DEVELOPER shall bear the burden of proof to demonstrate good faith compliance with the terms of this AGREEMENT. If, as a result of such review, CITY finds and determines that OWNER/DEVELOPER has not complied in good faith with the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT, CITY shall give written notice to OWNER/DEVELOPER of its findings and of the exact nature of OWNER/DEVELOPER’S non-compliance. OWNER/DEVELOPER shall be given a period of sixty (60) days after delivery of any such notice in which to cure, to the reasonable satisfaction of CITY, any non-compliance. In the event CITY fails to give OWNER/DEVELOPER notice of any non-compliance at or before the annual review, OWNER/DEVELOPER shall not be held responsible for any failure to comply with the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT during the year covered by the annual review.

27. CITY REMEDIES FOR BREACH. If OWNER/DEVELOPER is unable or otherwise fails to cure any non-compliance within sixty (60) days after CITY delivers notice of non-compliance pursuant to Section 26, CITY may, in addition to any other remedy provided by law or equity, modify or terminate this AGREEMENT, seek liquidated damages in accordance with this AGREEMENT, or take any other action available to it under this AGREEMENT.

In particular, and without limitation by reason of enumeration, OWNER/DEVELOPER acknowledges and agrees that failure to cure any noncompliance under this AGREEMENT, whether by OWNER/DEVELOPER or any successor, shall, at the option of the CITY, constitute a breach and default under this AGREEMENT as to all other property within the Project.

In the event of any breach/default or violation of any agreement, obligation, or warranty under this AGREEMENT, CITY shall give written notice to OWNER/DEVELOPER, with copies to the Senior Lenders, Ground Lessor, and the limited partners of OWNER/DEVELOPER, specifying: (a) the nature of the breach or violation, (b) the action required to cure the breach or violation, and (c) a date, which shall not be less than thirty (30) calendar days from the date of the notice, by which such action to cure must be taken. If OWNER/DEVELOPER fails to cure the breach or violation within the time frame specified in the notice CITY additionally has the right, at its sole election, to:

A. Bring an action for equitable relief seeking the specific performance by OWNER/DEVELOPER of the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT, and/or enjoining, abating, or preventing any violation of said terms and conditions, and/or seeking declaratory relief;
B. Intentionally deleted.

C. After notice provided for herein, make such repairs or replacements to the Property as are necessary and provide for payment thereof; D. For violations of OWNER/DEVELOPER’s obligations with respect to occupancy restrictions, Project maintenance, and unit vacancies, impose as liquidated damages a charge upon OWNER/DEVELOPER in an amount of THREE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($300) per day for each Project unit that is not operated in compliance with this AGREEMENT; Prior to the imposition of liquidated damages, OWNER/DEVELOPER shall be given a period of thirty (30) days after delivery of written notice from CITY in which to cure, to the reasonable satisfaction of CITY, any such violations;
E. For violations of OWNER/DEVELOPER’s obligations with respect to Project rents, impose as liquidated damages a charge upon OWNER/DEVELOPER in an amount equal to the actual amount OWNER/DEVELOPER has collected from any Qualifying Household in excess of the Qualifying Rent;
F. Pursue any other remedy allowed at law or in equity.

CITY’s rights hereunder shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, every other right or remedy provided for herein or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity by statute or otherwise, including, but not limited to injunctive relief, specific performance and damages. The exercise or beginning of exercise by CITY of any one or more rights or remedies, provided herein or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity by statute or otherwise, shall not preclude the simultaneous or later exercise by CITY of any or all other rights or remedies provided for in this AGREEMENT or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or by statute or otherwise. All such rights and remedies shall be considered cumulative and nonexclusive.

The parties agree that the sums and formulas designated herein as liquidated damages represent a reasonable approximation of the damages CITY is likely to suffer from violations of the respective terms. OWNER/DEVELOPER agrees to pay in full any accrued liquidated damages to CITY within ten (10) calendar days of a written demand by CITY for such payment.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, the Tax Credit Investor has the right, but not the obligation, to cure any Event of Default or other default hereunder.

CITY agrees that any cure of an Event of Default or other default by the Tax Credit Investor shall be deemed a cure by OWNER/DEVELOPER and shall be accepted or rejected on the same basis as if made by OWNER/DEVELOPER. CITY agrees to provide written notice of any Event of Default or other default to the Tax Credit Investor as provided herein concurrently with the provision of such notice to OWNER/DEVELOPER. As to the Tax Credit Investor, the cure period(s) specified herein shall commence upon the date of delivery of such notice to the Tax Credit Investor.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, CITY shall not exercise its rights under 26(C) or seek any money damages under this Agreement until the expiration of a 90-day period (the “Stand Still Period”) following Senior Lender’s and Ground Lessor’s receipt from CITY of notice of a default under this Agreement; provided, however, the Stand Still Period shall be automatically extended for such period of time as (i) Senior Lender is diligently pursuing remedies for an Event of Default under Senior Lender's loan documents secured by the Property, or (ii) Ground Lessor is diligently pursuing remedies for an Event of Default under the Ground Lease. During the Stand Still Period, however, CITY shall be entitled to pursue specific performance and/or injunctive relief against OWNER/DEVELOPER for those rights and remedies under this Agreement relating to income, rent, or affordability restrictions. Senior Lender and Ground Lessor shall have the right, but not the obligation, to cure a default under this Agreement during the Stand Still Period. Following a Transfer of the Property in connection with a foreclosure, deed in lieu of foreclosure, or other remedial action lawfully taken by any Senior Lender holding a security interest in the Property, the transferee shall not be liable under this Section 27 for any money damages that arose prior to the transferee having actual possession of the Property.

28. FEES, TAXES, AND OTHER LEVIES. OWNER/DEVELOPER shall be responsible for payment of all fees, assessments, taxes, charges, and levies imposed by any public authority or utility company with respect to the Property and the Project, and shall pay such charges prior to delinquency. However, OWNER/DEVELOPER shall not be required to pay any such charge so long as (a) the legality thereof is being contested in good faith and by appropriate proceedings, and (b) OWNER/DEVELOPER maintains reserves adequate to pay any contested liabilities.

29. INSURANCE COVERAGE. OWNER/DEVELOPER shall cause to have in full force and effect during the term of this AGREEMENT continuous insurance coverage as required by any lienholder.

30. PROPERTY DAMAGE OR DESTRUCTION. If any building or
improvement erected by OWNER/DEVELOPER on the Property is damaged or destroyed, subject to the requirements of the Senior Lenders and Ground Lessor, OWNER/DEVELOPER shall, at its own cost and expense, repair or restore the Property consistent with the original Plans and Specifications for the Project. Such work shall be commenced within one hundred twenty (120) calendar days after the damage or loss occurs and shall be completed within three hundred and sixty-five (365) calendar days thereafter. Subject to the requirements of the Senior Lenders and Ground Lessor, all insurance proceeds collected for such damage or destruction shall be applied to the cost of such repairs or restoration and, if insurance proceeds are insufficient for such purpose, OWNER/DEVELOPER shall make up the deficiency.

GENERAL PROVISIONS

31. SUBORDINATION. Except as expressly set forth herein, this AGREEMENT shall not be subordinated in priority to any other interest in the Property that was not recorded on or prior to the date of recordation of this Agreement, unless the CITY expressly consents, in writing, to the subordination or junior priority of this AGREEMENT. Such consent, if any, shall be within the CITY’s sole discretion, and may only be permitted, if at all, for purposes that conform with the circumstances authorized by California Health and Safety Code section 33334.14(a), and to the extent the proposed subordination does not jeopardize the CITY’s security interest in the property and is otherwise consistent and compliant with all legal standards, including eligibility requirements and other conditions imposed by funding sources for the Project.

32. TRANSFER AND ENCUMBRANCE OF PROPERTY. During the term of this AGREEMENT, OWNER/DEVELOPER shall not make or permit any sale, agreement to sell, assignment, conveyance, lease (other than the rental of Project units to eligible residential tenant occupants), or transfer of the Property or any part thereof, including the sale of any general or limited partnership interests, the removal of any general partner, or any substantial change in operational or management control over the Property (collectively referred to as “Transfers”), without the prior written consent of CITY. The limitations on OWNER/DEVELOPER’s right of assignment or other transfer contained in this paragraph 32 shall not apply to any foreclosure, deed in lieu of foreclosure, or other remedial action lawfully taken by any Senior Lender holding a security interest in the Property; nor shall they apply to the transfer of limited partner interests in OWNER/DEVELOPER and/or the removal and substitution of a general partner or a limited partner pursuant to the terms and conditions of OWNER/DEVELOPER’s organizational document ; nor shall it apply to (i) the sale of the fee estate in the Property to Ground Lessor, (ii) the Ground Lease, (iii) any remedy exercised pursuant to the Ground Lease and (iv) in connection with a subsequent sale or transfer of the Property following such exercise of remedy under the Ground Lease. .

CITY shall give its consent to a Transfer provided that it determines all of the following conditions are met: (a) OWNER/DEVELOPER is in compliance with this AGREEMENT or the Transfer will cure existing violations of this AGREEMENT; (b) the transferee agrees to assume all obligations of OWNER/DEVELOPER imposed by this AGREEMENT; (c) the transferee demonstrates to CITY’s satisfaction that it is capable of owning and/or operating the Property and the Project in full compliance with this AGREEMENT; (d) the terms of the Transfer shall not jeopardize the CITY’s security interest in the Property and is otherwise in full compliance with all legal standards, including eligibility requirements and other conditions imposed by funding sources for the Project; and (e) the Transfer has been approved by CITY’s governing body, if such approval is required. For the avoidance of doubt, CITY 's prior written consent shall not be required in connection with a foreclosure or a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure of any senior deed of trust or in connection with any refinancing of the any loan made by a Senior Lender, so long as this Agreement remains senior and non-subordinate.

Other than the Ground Lease, any fee financing entered into by Ground Lessor, any loans provided by Senior Lenders or refinance loans, during the term of this AGREEMENT, OWNER/DEVELOPER shall not engage in any financing or other transaction creating any mortgage or other encumbrance or lien upon the Property and/or the Project (except for any financing provided by CITY), without the prior written consent of CITY, which consent may be withheld in CITY’s sole discretion. CITY may give its consent to such financing if and only to the extent necessary to maintain or improve the affordability or condition of the Property and/or the Project.

33. NONLIABILITY OF OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS. No member, official, director, employee, agent or independent contractor of CITY shall be personally liable to OWNER/DEVELOPER or third party beneficiaries for any obligation created under the terms of this AGREEMENT.

34. INDEMNITY AND WAIVER. Notwithstanding the insurance coverage required herein, OWNER/DEVELOPER shall indemnify and hold CITY, its members, officials, directors, employees, agents and independent contractors (collectively “Indemnitees”), harmless against any losses, damages, liabilities, claims, demands, judgments, actions, court costs, and legal or other expenses (including attorney’s fees) which Indemnitees may incur as a result of (1) OWNER/DEVELOPER’s failure to perform any obligations as and when required by this AGREEMENT; (2) any failure of OWNER/DEVELOPER’s representations or warranties to be true and complete in any material respect; or (3) any act or omission by OWNER/DEVELOPER or any contractor, subcontractor, management agent, or supplier with respect to the Project or the Property, except to the extent that such losses are caused solely by the negligence or willful misconduct of Indemnitees. The duty of the OWNER/DEVELOPER to indemnify includes the duty to defend Indemnitees in any court action, administrative action, or other proceeding brought by any third party arising from the Project or the Property.

OWNER/DEVELOPER’s duty to indemnify Indemnitees shall survive the term of this AGREEMENT. Following a Transfer of the Property in connection with (i) a foreclosure, deed in lieu of foreclosure, or other remedial action lawfully taken by any Senior Lender holding a security interest in the Property, or (ii) any remedy exercised pursuant to the Ground Lease, the transferee shall not be liable under this Section 34 for any obligations that arose prior to the transferee having actual possession of the Property.

OWNER/DEVELOPER hereby waives any claims, suits, or actions against the CITY on account of or arising from the Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act, California Civil Code Sections 1954.50 et seq. (“CHRHA”). Furthermore, the parties hereby acknowledge and agree that, without limitation, any Project entitlements, permits, or approvals have conferred upon the OWNER/DEVELOPER and/or the Project either a direct financial contribution or other form of assistance pursuant to Section 1954.52(b) of the CHRHA.
35 GOVERNING LAW. This AGREEMENT shall be interpreted under and be governed by the laws of the State of California, except for those provisions relating to choice of law and those provisions preempted by federal law.

36. AGREEMENT CONTROLS. In the event of a conflict between any provisions of this AGREEMENT and any of its exhibits, the terms of this AGREEMENT shall control.

37. ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS. In the event that a legal or administrative action is brought to interpret or enforce the terms of this AGREEMENT, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover all reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in such action.

38. TIME. Time is of the essence in this AGREEMENT.

39. CONSENTS AND APPROVALS. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this AGREEMENT, any consent or approval required under the AGREEMENT shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed.

40. NOTICES, DEMANDS, AND COMMUNICATIONS. Formal notices, demands, and communications between OWNER/DEVELOPER and CITY shall be given by first class or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid or delivered personally, to OWNER/DEVELOPER and CITY as follows, or at such other address as a party may designate by written notice to the other party:

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
CITY Manager
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, California 95678

OWNER/DEVELOPER
Roseville Harvey 715, L.P.
c/o USA Properties Fund, Inc.
3200 Douglas Boulevard,
Suite 200
Roseville, CA 95661
Attention: President
and:

Riverside Charitable
Corporation
14131 Yorba Street
Tustin, CA 92780
Attention: Executive Director
and:

Banc of America CDC
Special Holding Company, Inc.
100 Federal Street
MA5-100-04-11
Boston, MA 02110
Attention: Asset Management
Safehold Inc., 1114 Avenue of
the Americas, New York, New
York l 0036, Attention: Chief
Legal Officer
Citibank, N.A.
388 Greenwich Street,
Trading 4th Floor
New York, New York 10013
Attention: Transaction
Management Group
Re : The Crawford, Deal ID #
50012475
Facsimile: (212) 723 8209

41. BINDING UPON SUCCESSORS. All provisions of this AGREEMENT shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, administrators, executors, successors in interest, transferees, and assigns of OWNER/DEVELOPER and CITY, and shall run with the land for the full term of this AGREEMENT. Any successor in interest to OWNER/DEVELOPER and any purchaser or transferee of the Property shall be subject to all of the duties and obligations imposed on OWNER/DEVELOPER under this AGREEMENT for the full term of this AGREEMENT. The term “OWNER/DEVELOPER” as used in this AGREEMENT shall include all such assigns, successors-in-interest, and transferees.

42. RELATIONSHIP OF PARTIES. The relationship of
OWNER/DEVELOPER and CITY for this Project during the term of this AGREEMENT shall not be construed as a joint venture, equity venture, or partnership. CITY neither undertakes nor assumes any responsibility or duty to OWNER/DEVELOPER or to any third party with respect to the operation of the Property or the actions of OWNER/DEVELOPER. Except as CITY may specify in writing, OWNER/DEVELOPER shall have no authority to act as an agent of CITY or to bind CITY to any obligation.

43. WAIVER. Any waiver by CITY of any obligation in this AGREEMENT must be in writing. No waiver shall be implied from any delay or failure by CITY to take action on any breach or default of OWNER/DEVELOPER or to pursue any remedy allowed under this AGREEMENT or applicable law. Any extension of time granted to OWNER/DEVELOPER to perform any obligation under this AGREEMENT shall not operate as a waiver or release from any of its obligations under this AGREEMENT.

Consent by CITY to any act or omission by OWNER/DEVELOPER shall not be construed as the consent to any other or subsequent act or omission or to waive the requirement for CITY’s written consent to future waivers.

44. OTHER AGREEMENTS. OWNER/DEVELOPER represents that it has not entered into any agreements that would restrict or compromise its ability to comply with the terms of this AGREEMENT. OWNER/DEVELOPER shall not enter into any agreements that are inconsistent with the terms of this AGREEMENT without an express written waiver by CITY.

45. AMENDMENTS AND MODIFICATIONS. Any amendments or
modifications to this AGREEMENT must be in writing, and shall be effective only if executed by both OWNER/DEVELOPER and CITY, following receipt of all required approvals, and only with the consent of the Senior Lenders and Ground Lessor.

46. SEVERABILITY. Every provision of this AGREEMENT is intended to be severable. If any provision of this AGREEMENT is held invalid, illegal, or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the validity, legality, and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not be affected or impaired.

SPECIAL PROVISIONS

47. REFINANCING REVIEW FEE. In the event that the Property and/or the Project is a tax credit project and is refinanced during the term of this Agreement, OWNER/DEVELOPER shall provide CITY a prepayment, upon request by OWNER/DEVELOPER, for CITY’s staff costs in reviewing any refinancing documentation submitted to CITY for CITY’s review and approval. Such prepayment shall be submitted by OWNER/DEVELOPER prior to CITY commencing any review.

The prepayment will be ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00). OWNER/DEVELOPER shall not be entitled to receive a refund of any such fee in the event that OWNER/DEVELOPER fails to complete such refinancing.

48. TENANT MONITORING FEE. Commencing one (1) year after the final Certificate of Occupancy for the Project and annually thereafter, OWNER/DEVELOPER shall pay to CITY, not later than March 31 of each year, a tenant monitoring fee equal to FORTY DOLLARS ($40) for each occupied, rent restricted, apartment unit within the Project, with such fee to be adjusted to reflect the Project’s actual occupancy rate. The fee for each unit shall be prorated over the portion of the year that the unit was occupied or leased. A penalty of ten percent (10%) per month shall be assessed against any fee not paid when due. Notwithstanding the foregoing, OWNER/DEVELOPER shall not be subject to a tenant monitoring fee, provided that the requirements of Government Code section 65915.3(b) are met.

49. PARTICIPATION IN HOUSING CHOICE VOUCHER PROGRAM. During the term of this AGREEMENT, OWNER/DEVELOPER agrees to participate in the Housing Choice Voucher (“HCV”) program administered by the Roseville Housing Authority (the “Authority”).

50. CHECKLIST FOR REGULATED UNITS. OWNER/DEVELOPER agrees that each prospective tenant, prior to rental of a Regulated Unit, shall be required to complete forms required by Exhibit C, or OWNER/DEVELOPER'S equivalent as approved in writing by CITY.

51. GROUND LESSOR PROTECTION. If Ground Lessor terminates the Ground Lease, it shall not be liable for any defaults or monetary obligations of OWNER/DEVELOPER arising prior to such termination. Ground Lessor shall not be obligated to construct or continue with construction of the Project.

EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
The land described herein is situated in the State of California, County of Placer, City of Roseville, and is described as follows:

RESULTANT LOT 19 AS SHOWN ON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT, EVIDENCED BY DOCUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 22, 2015 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2015- 004480 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

LOT 19, AS SAID LOT IS SHOWN AND SO DESIGNATED ON THAT CERTAIN PLAT ENTITLED "FIDDYMENT RANCH PHASE 1" FILED IN BOOK AA OF MAPS, PAGE 10, PLACER COUNTY RECORDS AND AS AMENDED BY
CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION RECORDED JUNE 22, 2005 AS
INSTRUMENT NO. 2005-0080325, AND AS AMENDED BY CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION RECORDED MAY 18, 2006 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2006- 0054209 OFFICIAL RECORDS.

TOGETHER WITH THE WEST 17.5 FEET OF LOT 20, AS SAID LOT IS SHOWN AND SO DESIGNATED ON THAT CERTAIN PLAT ENTITLED "FIDDYMENT RANCH PHASE 1" FILED IN BOOK AA OF MAPS, PAGE 10, PLACER COUNTY RECORDS.

APN: 017-117-097-000

EXHIBIT B

OCCUPANCY AND RENT RESTRICTIONS
O
One Bedroom
T
Two BedroomThree Bedroom
M
Maximum Household
Income as Percentage of
AMI
N
Number of
Units
I
Initial
Qualifying
Rent
N
Number of
Units
I
Initial
Qualifying
Rent
Number of
Units
Initial
Qualifying
RentI
5 50%
2 22
$
$1,050
4 46
$
$1,26523$1,466
8 80%
2 24
$
$1,713
4 46
$
$2,06223$2,385
$
Non-Rent Restricted On
Site Management
0 0 N/A
2 2
N
N/A1 N/A
T
TOTAL
4 46
9 9246

EXHIBIT C

CHECKLIST FOR AFFORDABLE RENTAL UNITS
The following documentation must be present in the Tenant’s file (in a form approved by the Housing Manager) for an “affordable renter.”
____ Certification of Affordable Rental Unit Eligibility Form ____ Calculation of Tenant Eligibility Form
____ Record of Rental Increases
____ Written, third party verification of all income sources, including:
____ Employment
____ Self-employment (tax return and profit & loss statement for current year)
____ Unemployment
____ AFDC (Welfare) Benefits
____ Child Support
____ Alimony
____ Social Security Benefits
____ Supplemental Security Income (SSK)
____ VA or Military Benefits
____ Pensions and/or Annuities
____ Retirement Funds
____ Savings Accounts (Interest Income)
____ Checking Accounts
____ Government Grants
____ Trust Funds
____ Stocks & Bonds (Cash Value)
____ Life Insurance (Cash Value)
Name ____________________________________ Complex ____________________________ Title _____________________________________ Date _______________________________

CERTIFICATION OF RESIDENT ELIGIBILITY
Re: ____________________________________ Apt. # __________ Apartment Complex
I/we have read and answered truthfully, fully frankly and personally each of the following questions for all persons who are to occupy the unit being applied for in the above apartment project. Listed below are the names of all persons who intend to reside in the unit:
1) Name of Members of the
Household
2) Relationship
to head of
Household 3) Age
4) Social
Security No.
5) Place of
Employment
___________________
___
____________
__
_____
_
__________
__
______________
__
___________________
___
____________
__
_____
_
__________
__
______________
__
___________________
___
____________
__
_____
_
__________
__
______________
__
___________________
___
____________
__
_____
_
__________
__
______________
__
___________________
___
____________
__
_____
_
__________
__
______________
__
___________________
___
____________
__
_____
_
__________
__
______________
__
___________________
___
____________
__
_____
_
__________
__
______________
__
___________________
___
____________
__
_____
_
__________
__
______________
__
___________________
___
____________
__
_____
_
__________
__
______________
__
___________________
___
____________
__
_____
_
__________
__
______________
__
CERTIFICATION OF RESIDENT ELIGIBILITY (cont.)

INCOME COMPUTATION
6) The total anticipated income calculated in accordance with this paragraph 6, of all persons (except children under the age of 18 years) listed above for the 12- month period beginning the date that I/we plan to move into a unit is $________________ .

Included in the total anticipated income listed above are:
a. All wages and salaries, overtime pay, commissions, fees and other compensation for personal services, before payroll deductions.

Excluded from such anticipated income are:
a. Casual, sporadic or irregular gifts;
b. Amounts which are specifically for or in reimbursement of medical expenses; c. Lump sum additions to family assets, such as inheritances, insurance payments (including payments under health and accident insurance and worker’s compensation), capital gains and settlements for personal or property losses;
d. Amounts of educational scholarships paid directly to the student or the educational institution and amounts paid by the government to a veteran for use in meeting the costs of tuition, fees, books, and equipment. Any amounts of such scholarships or payments to veterans not used for the above purposes are to be included in income;
e. Hazardous duty pay to a family member in the Armed Forces who is away from home and exposed to hostile fire;
f. Relocation payments under Title II of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970;
g. Foster child care payments;
h. The value of coupon allotments for the purchase of food pursuant to the Food Stamp Act of 1977.
7) This certificate is made with the knowledge that it will be relied upon by the Owner to determine maximum income for eligibility to occupy the unit; and I/we declare that all information set forth herein is true, correct and complete and based upon information I/we deem reliable and that the statement of total anticipated income contained in paragraph 6 is reasonable and based upon such investigation as the undersigned deemed necessary.
8) I/We will assist the Owner in obtaining any information or documents required to verify the statement made herein, including either an income verification from my/our present employer(s) or copies of federal tax returns for the immediately preceding calendar year.
9) I/We acknowledge that I/we have been advised that the making of any misrepresentation or misstatement in this declaration will constitute a material breach of my/our agreement with the Owner to lease the unit and will entitle the Owner to prevent or terminate my/our occupancy of the unit by institution of an action for eviction or other appropriate proceedings.

I/We declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed this _____ day of ___________________ in the City of ____________________ California.
_____________________________________
Applicant
_____________________________________
Applicant
_____________________________________
Applicant
_____________________________________
Applicant
_____________________________________
Applicant
[All persons listed in number 2 above, except children under the age of 18 must sign this form]

CALCULATIONS OF TENANT ELIGIBILITY

FOR AFFORDABLE RENTAL FORM
(FORM COMPLETION BY APARTMENT OWNER OR AGENT)
NAME: ____________________________________ UNIT # ____________

SOURCE MONTHLY ANNUAL
Social Security $
______________
$
______________ Social Security $
______________
$
______________ Civil Service $
______________
$
______________ Pension _________________________ $
______________
$
______________ Interest _________________________ $
______________
$
______________ Wages __________________________ $
______________
$
______________ Tips __________________________ $
______________
$
______________ Wages __________________________ $
______________
$
______________ Tips __________________________ $
______________
$
______________ Child Support $
______________
$
______________ Welfare $
______________
$
______________ Stocks/Bonds $
______________
$
______________ Other ___________________________ $
______________
$
______________ Other ___________________________ $
______________
$
______________ TOTAL INCOME $
______________
$
______________ Monthly base rent $
______________ Move-in date
______________
BY
___________________________________ TITLE _____________________________ DATE _____________________________

AFFORDABLE TENANT

RECORD OF RENTAL INCREASES
(FORM COMPLETION BY APARTMENT OWNER OR AGENT)
NAME ______________________________ APT. NO. _________
MOVE-IN DATE _____________________ INITIAL BASE RENT $___________ ANNUAL INCOME $_________________

DATE OF

INCREASE

CURRENT
RENT

RENEWAL FUNDING

INFLATION

FACTOR NEW RENT
_____________ $___________ X 1._______ = $___________
_____________ $___________ X 1._______ = $___________
_____________ $___________ X 1._______ = $___________
_____________ $___________ X 1._______ = $___________
_____________ $___________ X 1._______ = $___________
_____________ $___________ X 1._______ = $___________
_____________ $___________ X 1._______ = $___________
_____________ $___________ X 1._______ = $___________
_____________ $___________ X 1._______ = $___________
_____________ $___________ X 1._______ = $___________
_____________ $___________ X 1._______ = $___________
_____________ $___________ X 1._______ = $___________
_____________ $___________ X 1._______ = $___________
_____________ $___________ X 1._______ = $___________
_____________ $___________ X 1._______ = $___________

AFFORDABLE TENANT
RECORD OF RENTAL INCREASES (For Tax Credit Projects Only) (FOR COMPLETION BY APARTMENT OWNER/DEVELOPER OR AGENT)
NAME: APT. #
MOVE-IN DATE:

ANNUAL INCOME:

INITIAL BASE RENT:

DATE OF

INCREASE

CURRENT

RENT NEW RENT

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 3663
File #: 0709-02
Title:

HOUSING SUCCESSOR/CITY COUNCIL - Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Annual Report of the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund
Contact: Claudia Carreno 916-774-5476 [email protected] Trisha Isom 916-746-1239 [email protected]
Meeting Date: 12/18/2024
Item #: 7.23.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff requests that the City Council, acting as the Housing Successor, adopt a resolution approving the Fiscal Year 2023-24 Annual Report for the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund.

BACKGROUND
State of California legislation dissolved all California Redevelopment Agencies in 2012. As part of the dissolution process of the City of Roseville's Redevelopment Agency, the City elected to become the Housing Successor. State law requires the Housing Successor to maintain any funds transferred to it, together with any funds generated from housing assets in a separate Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund and requires the funds to be used in accordance with applicable affordable housing-related provisions of the Community Redevelopment Law. These statutes require the Housing Successor to expend funds for specified administrative and monitoring costs related to ensuring the long-term affordability of deed-restricted affordable units.

Beginning in 2014, Housing Successors were required to produce an annual report of their housing activities, required by SB 341. The annual report, known as the Report of Required Information, is due to the Housing Successor's governing body by December 31st of each year and must include an independent financial audit of the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund ("Fund"), for the most recent fiscal year. The audit may be separate or included in the host jurisdiction's annual audit. The Report of Required Information must be included as part of the Annual Progress Report for the Housing Element which is reported to the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development and must also be posted on the Housing Successor's website by the end of the calendar year.

The Report of Required Information, per Health and Safety Code 34171.1(f), is mandated to include the following information from the prior year:

1. The amount deposited into the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund.

2. A statement of the fund balance as of the close of the last fiscal year.

3. A description of expenditures from the fund by category.

4. The statutory value of real property owned by the Housing Successor, the value of loans and grants receivable, and the sum of these two amounts.

5. A description of any transfers made.

6. A description and status of any project for which the Housing Successor receives or holds property tax revenue pursuant to the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule.

7. For interests in real property acquired by the former Redevelopment Agency prior to February 1, 2012, a status update on compliance with Section 33334.16. For interests in real property acquired on or after February 1, 2012, a status update on the project.

8. A description of any outstanding obligations pursuant to Section 33413 that remained to transfer to the Housing Successor on February 1, 2012, of the Housing Successor’s progress in meeting those obligations, and of the Housing Successor’s plans to meet unmet obligations.

9. Reporting on income targeting requirements.

10. The percentage of units of deed-restricted rental housing restricted to seniors and assisted individually or jointly by the housing successor, its former redevelopment agency, and its host jurisdiction within the previous 10 years in relation to the aggregate number of units of deed-restricted rental housing assisted individually or jointly by the Housing Successor, its former redevelopment agency, and its host jurisdiction within the same time period.

11. The amount of any excess surplus, the amount of time that the Housing Successor has had excess surplus, and the Housing Successor’s plan for eliminating the excess surplus. The completed Report of Required Information for the City of Roseville Housing Successor Agency is included as Attachment A of Attachment 1.

12. An inventory of homeownership units assisted by the former redevelopment agency or the Housing Successor that are subject to covenants or restrictions or to an adopted program that protects the former redevelopment agency’s investment of moneys from the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 33334.3.

For FY2023-24, the total deposits made into the Housing Successor fund totaled $450,374 which is average from the preceding years. A total of $56,700 was received as program income from loan payoff proceeds and $252,532 from city loan payoffs. The total expenditures from the Housing Successor fund equaled $913,696, an increase from the preceding year of $280,343.

The increase in expenditures is attributed to loaning $500,000 for development of an affordable housing project and funding an Outreach Worker for $80,000. The ending balance of the Housing Successor fund for FY2023-24 equaled $1,918,010. The fund balance has not exceeded the sum of deposits in the prior four years.

Since the audit of Low and Moderate Income Asset Fund (Fund 2841) is included in the City of Roseville’s Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR), as allowed by SB 341, that information will be provided to the State of California. The City's ACFR for FY2023-24 will be presented to the City Council in early 2025 and will be available on the City’s website at www.roseville.ca.us under Departments & Divisions, Finance, Financial Transparency, or by searching for ACFR.

FISCAL IMPACT
Activities of the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund are separate and are not dependent upon the General Fund. Use of these funds for the development and programming of local affordable housing units and homeless prevention and services reduces impacts on the General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The Fiscal Year 2023-24 Housing Successor Annual Report meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal D - Enhance economic vitality.

Respectfully Submitted,
Claudia Carreno, Management Analyst
Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 24-402
23/24 Report of Required Information
RESOLUTION NO. 24-402

APPROVING THE ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING ASSET FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
WHEREAS, in 2012 the California State Legislature dissolved redevelopment agencies, and the City of Roseville Housing Successor Agency assumed the housing assets and functions of the former City of Roseville Redevelopment Agency; and WHEREAS, SB-341 requires Housing Successors to produce an annual report of their housing activities by December 31st of each year; and
WHEREAS, staff has prepared the Report of Required Information for the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund for fiscal year 2023-24.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville approves the Report of Required Information for the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund for fiscal year 2023-24.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk
Report of Required Information per Health and Safety Code 34176.1 (f) City of Roseville Housing Successor
Fiscal Year 2023‐24
Page | 1

1. Any amounts deposited into the Fund, with segregation of amounts deposited from payments pursuant to a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule ("ROPS") from other sources.

Amount Source Purpose
$60,864   Interest on Investments Earned Fund Balance‐Reserved $19,500   Interest on Notes/Loans Fund Balance‐Reserved $45,778   Monitoring Fees Fund Balance‐Reserved
$252,532   20% Deposit from City Loan Payoff Fund Balance‐Reserved $56,700   Loan Payoffs‐Program Income Fund Balance‐Reserved $15,000 Other Income Fund Balance‐Reserved
$450,374   Total Deposits

2. The balance in the Fund at the fiscal year end, with segregation of amounts held to meet obligations on a ROPS from other amounts.

Amount Description
$1,911,160 Ending Cash
$6,850 Interest Receivable
$1,918,010    Fund Balance 6/30/24

3. A description of expenditures from the Fund by category for:
a. Monitoring and preserving the long‐term affordability of units subject to affordability restrictions or covenants entered by the redevelopment agency or the housing successor and administering permitted affordable housing activities. The amount that can be spent on monitoring and administration is capped at 2% of the value of the assets in the Fund or $200,000 whichever is greater.
b. Homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services. This amount is limited to $250,000 annually.
c. Development of housing affordable to households at or below 80% of area median income ("AMI").

Amount Description
$50,452   a. Staff charges for Monitoring
$101,046   a. Professional Services
$12,199   a. Misc Office Charges
$249,999   b. Homeless Prevention
$500,000   c. Development of housing
$913,696 Total Expenditures
Report of Required Information per Health and Safety Code 34176.1 (f) City of Roseville Housing Successor
Fiscal Year 2023‐24
Page | 2

4. The statutory value of real property owned by the housing successor, the value of loans and grants receivable, and the sum of these two amounts. "Statutory value of real property" means the value of properties formerly held by the former redevelopment agency as listed on the housing asset transfer form approved by the Department of Finance ("DOF") and the purchase price of properties purchased by the housing successor.

Amount Description
$875,000   Land ‐ Note Receivable
$5,760,000   Mercy Housing ‐ Deferred Receivables
$500,000 Hampstead Prospera at Fiddyment
Workforce
$3,693,755 FTHB/commercial Deferred Receivables
$861,715   Residential
$11,690,470 Total Value of Land & A/R

5. A description of any inter‐jurisdictional transfers of monies from the Fund in the previous fiscal year as well as any transfer from prior fiscal years if the funds are still unencumbered and a description of and status update on any project for which transferred funds have been or will be expended if that project has not yet been placed in service.

None

6. A description of any project for which the housing successor receives or holds real property tax revenue pursuant to the ROPS and the status of that project.

None

7. For interests in real property acquired by the former redevelopment agency prior to February 1, 2012, a status update on compliance with the development of the property within five (5) years after the DOF approved the property as a housing asset, which would typically be the date of approval of the housing asset transfer list. For interests in real property acquired on or after February 1, 2012, a status update on the project.

Mercy Housing secured a loan from the Housing Successor for $5,760,000 for the development of a 58‐ unit mixed‐use affordable housing development at 623 Vernon Street, Roseville. The loan was approved by the City Council, acting as the Housing Successor, on November 16, 2016. The project was completed in November 2018.

In 2016, the Housing Successor committed $600,000 of funding from the low/moderate affordable housing funds towards the Junction Crossing affordable rental housing development at 120 Pacific Street.

The deferred low interest loan was approved by the City Council, acting as the Housing Successor, on October 20, 2021.  This project includes 80 affordable units available for low‐ and very low‐income households and was completed in February 2024.

Report of Required Information per Health and Safety Code 34176.1 (f) City of Roseville Housing Successor
Fiscal Year 2023‐24
Page | 3
The Housing Successor loaned $500,000 in gap funding to Hampstead Company’s Prospera at Fiddyment ‐ Workforce Housing project for the development of a 104‐unit mixed‐income affordable housing development.  The project is located at 2801 North Hayden Parkway in West Roseville and was completed in October 2024. The loan was approved by the City Council, acting as the Housing Successor, on April 3, 2024.

8. A description of any outstanding replacement housing and housing production obligations that transferred to the housing successor on February 1, 2012, the housing successor's progress in meeting those obligations, and the housing successor's plans to meet the unmet obligations.

The Agency finalized a loan of $500,000 from Low/Mod funds to one affordable rental project that developed 59 very low‐ and low‐income units.  The Agency will continue to use loan portfolio payoffs and 20% set‐aside deposits from City loan payments to provide additional assistance for affordable housing developments. The value of the 20% loan receivable from the Successor Agency on June 30, 2024, is $2,234,941 providing the California Department of Finance approves the payment of the City loans by the Successor Agency.

9. Reporting on income targeting requirements does not need to be included until December 31, 2019 for the period from January 1, 2014 through the end of the fiscal year covered by the report (June 30, 2019 for most housing successors), and every five years thereafter. However, it may be useful for housing successors to track this information on an annual basis to ensure the requirement is met every five years. The required income targeting expenditures are that, over a five year period, the funds remaining after expenditures for monitoring and administration and rapid rehousing services, if any, must be expended for the development of housing affordable to and occupied by households earning 80% or less of the AMI, with at least 30% of the funds expended on the development of housing affordable to and occupied by households earning 30% or less of the AMI and not more than 20% of the funds expended on the development of housing affordable to and occupied by households earning between 60% and 80% of the AMI.

Project Loan Mount Assisted Units AMI
Prospera at Fiddyment
Workforce
500,000.00   8 30%
Junction Crossing     438,000.00   8 30%
Junction Crossing    162,000.00   3 50%
Report of Required Information per Health and Safety Code 34176.1 (f) City of Roseville Housing Successor
Fiscal Year 2023‐24
Page | 4

10. The percentage of units of deed‐restricted rental housing restricted to seniors and assisted individually or jointly by the housing successor, its former redevelopment agency, and its host jurisdiction within the previous 10 years in relation to the total number of units of deed‐ restricted rental housing assisted individually or jointly by the housing successor, its former redevelopment agency, and its host jurisdiction within the same time period. If the percentage of assisted senior rental housing is more than 50 percent of the total of all assisted rental housing, no additional senior rental housing can be assisted until the percentage falls to 50 percent or less.

In last 10 years:
# of Units Description
0 Senior Restricted Rental Housing Units
601 Non‐Senior Restricted Rental Housing Units
601 Total Units
0% % of Senior Restricted Rental Housing Units

11. The amount of any excess surplus, the amount of time that the successor agency has had the excess surplus, and the housing successor's plan for eliminating the excess surplus. The definition of excess surplus has been modified so that an "excess surplus" exists to the extent a housing successor holds unencumbered funds in its Fund in an amount that exceeds the greater of $1,000,000 or the total amount of deposits into the Fund for the preceding four fiscal years. The housing successor is required to spend the excess surplus amount or transfer that amount to another jurisdiction as provided in Health and Safety Code Section 34176.1(c)(2) within three fiscal years. If not, the excess surplus amount must be transferred to HCD to use pursuant to the Multifamily Housing Program or the Joe Serna, Jr. Farmworker Housing Grant Program.

Fiscal Year Amount Deposited
FY2022‐23 $500,424
FY2021‐22 $1,301,704
FY2020‐21 $603,561
FY2019‐20 $419,559
TOTAL $2,825,248
Fund Balance – 6/30/23 $1,918,010
Amount of Fund Balance does not exceed the
sum of the deposits in the prior four years. $0
Report of Required Information per Health and Safety Code 34176.1 (f) City of Roseville Housing Successor
Fiscal Year 2023‐24
Page | 5

12. Inventory of Home Ownership Units: This section provides an inventory of homeownership units assisted by the former Agency or FVHA as Housing Successor that are subject to covenants or restrictions or to an adopted program that protects the former Agency’s investment of moneys from the Low and Moderate Income Fund per Section 33334.3 (f).

Loan Date Loan Due in yrs Address Amount
12/2/2008 45 121 Hickory Street 77,300.00
12/2/2008 45 177 Hickory Street 100,000.00
2/18/2009 45 109 Hickory Street 100,000.00
6/30/2009 45 153 Hickory Street 98,637.00
11/4/2009 45 145 Hickory Street 100,000.00
11/24/2009 45 125 Hickory Street 85,778.00
11/25/2009 45 141 Hickory Street 100,000.00
11/25/2009 45 113 Hickory Street 100,000.00
3/11/2010 45 149 Hickory Street 100,000.00
TOTAL $861,715.00

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 3681
File #: 0800-02 & 0800-03
Title:

Customer Information System - Sole Source Master Professional Services Agreement and Support and Maintenance Agreement
Contact: Caitlin Ornelas 916-774-5178 [email protected] Meeting Date: 12/18/2024
Item #: 7.24.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a sole source Master Professional Services Agreement and Support and Maintenance Agreement with Cayenta, a Division of N. Harris Computer Corporation. Staff also requests authority for the City Manager, or his designee, to execute two additional one-year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council each year.

BACKGROUND
Roseville first entered into an agreement with Cayenta, a division of N. Harris Computer Corporation, in 2014 to implement the Cayenta Customer Information System (CIS). The system went live in November 2017. Cayenta is the sole provider to deliver the necessary licensing, support, and maintenance services for the CIS, which is integral to the billing of utility services for the City of Roseville.

FISCAL IMPACT
The cost of this agreement for FY2024-25 is $215,862.22 and all necessary funds are included in the Electric and Environmental Utilities FY2024-25 operating budgets. In accordance with the terms of the agreement, fees will increase annually by the greater of three percent (3%) or CPI, not to exceed seven percent (7%) annually. Therefore, staff request City Council provide authorization to adjust the annual contract cost for the optional years, and the appropriate amounts will be included in future year budgets. This recommendation has no impact on the City’s General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of this sole source Master Professional Services Agreement and Support and Maintenance Agreement meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA.

No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Caitlin Ornelas, Utility Business Systems Administrator Daniel Beans, Electric Utility Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 24-417
Master Agreement
Support and MaintenanceAgreement
RESOLUTION NO. 24-417

APPROVING A MASTER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT AND SUPPORT

AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND CAYENTA, A DIVISION OF N. HARRIS COMPUTER CORPORATION, AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THEM

ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, a Master Professional Services Agreement, as well as a Support and Maintenance Agreement for the system utilized by Electric, Water, Wastewater, and Solid Waste departments for billing, customer service, field operations, analytics, and managing monthly billing, by and between the City of Roseville and Cayenta, a Division of N. Harris Computer Corporation, has been reviewed by the City Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Master Professional Services Agreement, and associated Support and Maintenance Agreement, are hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute them on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to execute two (2) additional one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council each year, or until City staff determines that continuing with the same vendor is not in the City’s best interest.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk
 








 









 !"#"$%&'()**+,-./+01-+234
56
7 8
90







:

 ;




%)
23
<=<

8



9
>?
@A1B.C1-.DBEF
67
GHI J=KLK=MK K=N KO  P K=O K=Q KPR
 K=S=
GN KJ O 
KRP
KP= =P=KK=RK=K
TJ =U


6

!K=P=K K=RRQP
==RK=KTJ == 
 J=
QRQP=K K=V PKO=RKPK=P
MKPK 

PW=MQJG!O KJ QQMX
Y:+@Z:HKTJ =QQP=P=[PK
\=QQP=K=R 
O K V]G
 %&'()
B.-.1^+@Z234_'(`(ab&(`cKTJ =MKQQRKPQQ 
=M ROMV"GKK=Q=VG
 d(`efgh%(ai'a)+B+j1^+@Z234_'(kle&eam
_(`nalg&'(o(l(pam_(`nhh'ammifmm(i&eq(mrs(`(b(``(g&fah&'()+@Z24 t:+@/.,+u:
1F-1-+Z+B->uFD*6D@v:HO KQQwPRx=y W PO zP! MKPh'amms(a&&ai'(g'(`(&fah{i'(g|m()}2c{i'(g|m()~2calghfflah`(|e`(gsr I J=KLK==J 
O KU[Px=y WMKQQRzP  =P=KK=KTJ =U€=
=P=QKPM=KTJ =
==
x=y WwPR
O K! KTJ =QQ
O 
KQU

F1@@.u‚u
^.A1-.DBu:N KQQRP PKQQ
 =Q O 
K
O K=Q
KPRK=OOQKPQx=y W%&'()+@/.,+u23U ƒ„
†‡ˆ‰Š‹ŠŒŽ„ƒ‘’“”•‹”–—˜™”–š˜›œ“˜š™”’˜—žž™“šœ—™’‹ 





!
""#$%&
"'"(%)
*
"+#,
$-."/

#0
%#


/"

$%&"+#1
%)
' 2#
/%!
""#$3

#45
'"(
%#
"

%#+
%."/

#0
%#
6789:;<9:=9>;7?@A<9:=:=BCD:=;@?:!
""#$
%&"+#1
#%$*
"+#,
$E
##4F,,
$$%

1G$
'."/

#0
%#
67@9HDIDAD=7J=BCDKL=>AJ89:;<9:=9>;7?@A<9:=
"
MG#"
1N!
""#$%&
"'"(%)
*
"+#,
$E
###4O
"$



1
$$#$%

,

$#$"

$

N"
MG#"
1%

!
""#$%&
"'"(%)

*
"+#,
$E

1

PQF"
&"
$

%
%#+
2#%)
G%)"#%N%
&&"+
%)
&

$

11
#+
"

$1
$,"#
1#

%)

&& #,

*%
%
(

%'R"S#'$"
MG#"
14

1TU VWX
YQ."/

#0
%#
(
N"
%
#

OZ[,&N'

N"
&"%$"%)
"1
#+
"

$
&"+#1
1N!
""#$%."/

#0
%#

$&
"%'%)
*
"+#,
$\]^=ID_=:9`I=7ab-)2
+
"!
""#$
#$

1$)
"
(
#
%)
2

"'
,&N"#/)%-&
%

%$-%"
1 (
"S$-%"
1 $
,"
%$

1%)
"
#
%

,%G
&"&
"%N"#/)%$4

cQdVVWQ

TdVVWQ5
,
$#1
"
%#
'&"+#1#
/%)
*
"+#,
$-."/

#0
%#

/"

$%&
N%)
'

$$
%G%#

%)

&& #,

*%
%
(

%'R"S\A8=]dVVWabA?!
""#$4."/

#0
%#

,S
2
1/
$%)
%%)

[

$(
N
#
,"

$
1'"(%#(
%%#(
-&"+#1
1!
""#$'#"$%1
#+
"$
%#,
'$G,)[

$
#
,"

$

%

$%%)#"%NefgT1
N$&"#"%%)


#+
"$
"N'%)
h''
,%#+
Z
%
4
Ti P
VWQZG"#
/%)
%
"('%)#$F/"

(

%-!
""#$$)
1
#+
"#
+#,
$%."/

#0
%#
4
j

$$%)
"2#$
$%
%
1#
%)

&& #,

*%
%
(

%'R"S-

,)#
+#,
1
#+
"
1%
."/

#0
%#
N!
""#$$)

1G


1&
N

G&
"
,
#&%%)
"
'N."/

#0
%#
4

TklVWQ)
[

$
"

m, G$#+
'%
m
$4."/

#0
%#

/"

$%&
N

&& #,

$

$

1
G$
%
m
$-#'

Ne
m, G1#
/%
m
$
!
""#$67>=AD>H?L=b\]klVWabC>I=77DAK:?_D;=7
!Fnn5*2#%)
%
m
m
(&%#
,
"%#'#,
%

,,
&%

%%)

&& #,

%
m#
/
G%)"#%#
$4

To
VpqrV
Q5
%)

+

%."/

#0
%#
'
# $%&
N
"

N&"%#
'

#
+#,


"
'"

#

%NesgT1
N$
'%
"%)
1
%
#%
,(
$1G
\]tC:=u=:D?;ab-#

11#%#
%

%)
""
(
1#
$!
""#$)
$G
1 "%)#$F/"

(

%"%)
"2#$
-!
""#$$)
)
+
%)
&%#

%$G$&

1"%
"(#

%

*
"+#,
$G
1 "%)#$F/"

(

%4!
""#$$)
&"+#1

."/

#0
%#
2#%)
%#,
'

v&
N(

%1G"#
/%)
wG"
O
"#1%
2."/

#0
%#


"

$

%#(
%,G"
$G,)

v&
N(

%1G"#
/%)
wG"
O
"#14*G$&

$#
"
%
"(#

%#
'

N$G,)*
"+#,
$$)

%"
#
+
%)
."/

#0
%#
'#%$ #/
%#
%&
N
#%$G%$%

1#
/#
+#,
$-#
, G1#
/

N
&& #,


%
,)
"/
$4

xQy
q

zy
qQ!
""#$2
""

%$%)
%%)
*
"+#,
$2# 
&
"'"(
1#

&"'
$$#



1
1# #/

%(

"N&
"$

2)
"
,(&
%

%#
&
"'"(#
/%)
#"#
1#+#1G
%
$S$4
{|}~€‚ƒ‚„
†|‡
ˆ{‰Š‹ŒƒŒŽ‘ŒŽ’“”•‹’‘ŒŠ––‘‹’”‘Šƒ•







 !"#
$


!%



#
&'()"%
#
%



*
+,-.-/,0123454,5406
!
"
#


"




"!
 "


7"
$ !"
#7$

"7$
!
"

 
7#"%
#
 %


7


##
!
8




# 



!
#





%
#

 %


7


##
!
"
# 7

"
7


"
!
$ #
97
" #

"

7

"$
$
#7 7"
 :

$
8



!%
# 
 $
*
;-<,52.=>?,554@>.54A402-B
%


!

$

 






7 
!





7
*


$$
#$

8

CDEFGHIJKHLI
()DEFGHIJKHLIMNOPQRRSRTUS(VWRURQSNT(URX(OYZ[[Z\O] 
^)'N)
T(XXNUNZTUZ(TVZUMRQQNPMUO(TXQRSRXNRO(_(N[(W[RUZNU"RNUMRQ`(QUVS(VNSSRXN(UR[V URQSNT(URUMNOPQRRSRTUNTUMRR_RTUZYS(URQN([WQR(^MWVUMRZUMRQ`(QUVZYNUOZW[NP(UNZTO(TX UM(UWQR(^MNOTZU^aQRX\NUMNTUMNQUV'b)X(VOZYQR^RN`UZY\QNUURTTZUN^RUZUM(URYYR^Uc X)'NN)NUMRQ`(QUVS(VURQSNT(URUMNOPQRRSRTURYYR^UN_RNSSRXN(UR[Va`ZT\QNUURTTZUN^RUZUMR ZUMRQ`(QUVNYUMRZUMRQ`(QUV]'N)WR^ZSRONTOZ[_RTUc'NN)WR^ZSROUMROaWdR^UZY(TV`QZ^RRXNTP aTXRQ(TVW(TeQa`U^V"NTOZ[_RT^VZQ[NfaNX(UNZT[(\"\MRUMRQXZSROUN^ZQYZQRNPT"(TX\MRUMRQ _Z[aTU(QVZQNT_Z[aTU(QV"\MN^MNOTZUQROZ[_RXY(_ZaQ(W[VUZUMROaWdR^U`(QUV\NUMNTTNTRUV'gb) X(VOZY^ZSSRT^RSRTUUMRQRZYcZQ'NNN)WR^ZSROOaWdR^UUZ`QZ`RQUVORNhaQRaTXRQ^ZaQUZQXRQ" ^ZaQUNTdaT^UNZTZQZUMRQ^ZaQUZQXRQ\MN^MM(O(S(URQN([(X_RQORRYYR^UZTNUO(WN[NUVUZ`RQYZQS MRQRaTXRQcZQ R)'NNN)$ZQ^ZT_RTNRT^Rijjkjlmnopqrstnu;vwkmmljjimkxlWVRNUMRQ`(QUV"`QZ_NXRXUM(UNTUMR^(OR ZYURQSNT(UNZTYZQ^ZT_RTNRT^RWVQP(TNh(UNZT"NUSaOU`(VYZQ([[RQ_N^RO`RQYZQSRXa`UZ(TX NT^[aXNTPUMRX(URZYURQSNT(UNZT8

W)
yyEzK{LyDEFGHIJKHLI
'N)
TUMRR_RTUZYURQSNT(UNZTZYUMNOPQRRSRTUQP(TNh(UNZTOM([[NSSRXN(UR[V`(V([[ ZaUOU(TXNTP$RRO(TXZUMRQ(SZaTUOZ\NTPUZ
aTXRQUMNOPQRRSRTUc(TX
'NN)MNOPQRRSRTUOM([[(aUZS(UN^([[VURQSNT(URNTUMRR_RTUUM(UUMRZYU\(QR N^RTOR |}~€‚ƒ„ƒ
†‡}ˆ†‰|Š‹ŒŽ„‘’“‘”•–Œ‘“’‹‘——’Œ“•’‹„–
 

 










!"#$""%"&"'("$)*"+,-((.*/,.".01!$$*%1*% 22*.*"%1'+"/! 2!"*$$"%("/*3"+*$"/ $%1 22*/"$%1 45678944:;<=:>;?4>87=4?:@4<AB?47B;CB7BA9;<= $#'*D* '@: "&/.E%*3"$")"+-0*!$"%("/ !"%"$3*/"%'+'- !"$ ($ +E/%1)"$*.%%E((.*"+,-!$$*%*'/ ''"/* '0*!!*% #$"")"'2 $+)#"%2 $'-/E%"'+$"#$+."%% 2!"/E%" 2/* '10!"!"$*'/ '$/ $*' $1*'/.E+*'#2E'+)"'. ,$"/!1'"#.*#"'/"1%$*/.*,*.*- $ !"$0*%"1%!..' "&/""+*' !"##$"#"') E'!*%"FE. !"2""%(*+ !$$*%,- $#'*D* '(E$%E' !"$"."3'%")"' 20 $G 
*'' "3"'%!..!$$*%1*%22*.*"%'+"/! 2!"*$$"%("/*3" +*$"/ $%1 22*/"$%1")(. -""%'+%!$"! .+"$%1,".*,."2 $'- / '%"FE"'*.1*'/*+"'.1*'+*$"/1"&")(.$-1(E'**3"1 $%("/*. +)#"%0!% "3"$1*'/.E+*'#,E' .*)*"+ 2 $. %$"3"'E" $. %% 2($ 2*%1. %% 2,E%*'"%%1. %% 2+12*.E$" $".*D" "&("/"+%3*'#%1 $/ % 2%E,%*E"# +% $%"$3*/"%$*%*'# E 2 $*'/ ''"/* '0*!!*%#$"")"'1"3"'*2*!%,""'+3*%"+ 2 !".*G".*! + 2!" //E$$"'/" 2%E/!. %% $+)#" $%E/!. %% $+)#"*%2 $%"",."'+' 0*!%'+*'#'-2*.E$" 2 "%%"'*.(E$( %" 2'-.*)*"+$")"+-

HIJK
LM
NOK"
PQ
 R
PSTU

 Q


RP
V/W



U*W

W Q
XYZ[\]^\Y_X\XYZ[\`ab[acdXcc[dYaXc`aYZYZab;e\[[f[cYghIJK LMif[^cb

UU
W




U Q
 Q

PU


 R 



PW



U


R
W


U

  Q




 Q
 Q

PU


 RQ


jU


  


PW



U1TQ
PQ



PU

jRj


jR

 R
PP
T
Q Q

 1TQ Q
kPQ

W





U1T
1
Q
PUP 
PW1TQ
PQl

mn
S
o/W



U1o
o$

P 
1oo(

R*W

o Q


U

S
1m,nSTjR Q


 
jP


PW



U

R1m/nTQ
PQ
QkU
jSTk


 j
PW



U

RjR


V

k
UP




jUPP

Upk
 
 Q
P
Pk

P
/W



U*W



 
PUk

W

  Q   Q

kPQ

W

lm
n

jP

UURST  QkjU
PjR
R

 Q Q

j
PQ
W QjU



W
P
V

 RQk
qm

nT

V
k
URST  QP
V

 R

V

P
jR

T
P

qm

n


Q URP
V
jR QP
V

 RW
 Q



 RTQ

 k

jU


WPW



U
Rqm
Vn




 UR
VU
jR Q
P
V

 RT
Qk WP k
W Q Q
 Rr
/W



U*W

TQ
PQ

kPQ


 
VU P
j

jU

Q
jRV

P Q
TkU
j
PP
jU 

Pk WP  pk

P

stuvwxyz{z|}~t}€s‚ƒ„
{„†‡ˆ‰„†Šˆ‹ŒƒˆŠ‰„‚ˆ‡ŽŽ‰ƒŠŒ‡‰‚{





 





!
"#
$
$%$
&$
'($
#
$


)
$$
&$$&*''

$+'
,-
''+$'$

*


-$$
&$
'
$&




)
$
#
$,

%$
&$
'($
#
$


)
# .$.

/&.,&
'.
,
)
$ 

.+'

$0
"$.%$
&$
'($
#
$


)
$
$.
1


$ 







#
$ 
+'

$.$&

2
#$0
"$&
'

'.%$
&$
'($
#
$1
1$
3.

&+)


'
+''-
&.

$ .


$$$
$-
$)'


$,
+


$



&
$ +&.
$

$$$
$-
.+4#

2
#$,

5
&&


5 $ 

)''


5
$+'$
&
'
$ 

)


.&
'.

&
'
$ 

)#)+
$


5
&

3.
5'$$&

5
&&


5 $ 

)''#
')-
$).


5
&

3.
5'$0

"$&
'

'.%$
&$
'($
#
$$)

&

$-
.



-

$$$&
'
$ 

),1

.

/&#
')
 $

5 $ 


)-5$&*$-.
$
#
$

.




#$.$&


2 #$$&1


$ 


.$&

2
#$,$&-
+.$&+)$
&$
'
)
6789:;<96=>;<8?;><;>@A6<?B<9C?6D<E?F9>B86>9=:@;A<GH>I6=D9F?=<9;8J=D6AK;<96=;><E9> 2 #$0$&
4"*.
$#)+
$+')$
)$


#$-

#
')
$& $,
$'.&
$ ##$
$ ' '

&
$ L
M N

O
 "P

Q



#*+


&&
$)'
#,$
5
)

&

.

$ .

'
$ 
2
#$

'
$


&+)
2
#$

. $

'5'


$
5

)L2

)#)
3.


)






$$$R+
$&
$ #&

$
$S%'

$
+
+

$
$ '
#,
$
5
)
&

.
$.

+
$)


+.$'LS.#&

$
+$&.&
+)

$
$&
5 &.'#&


#&




$&+)#&

$
5 #..'')

+'


LS.#&

''+*$-'& +'
$-
)#
#$L
Q#&

$''*
'
#$&'
$
$%'

$
-

'#..'')

+'0

5
&&0-5
,$
&R.
$#&

$''.
$'
$$
$)
TUV"&)




)$



&

5&

.+
'&+

#&

LQ$&1
$#&

$,
$'.&
$ #
$
$$&1
$
#&

T$&1

;<<6A=?GH>
$.

&+)



)",
+
&+)



3.'')L(



.$+'
'5'
#,$
5
)
&

.-

$$
$)TUV"
&)
&



)

5
&
$
#&

$,$



)#)+

$ 
$&
$

' '

&
$ 
'5'
#,$
5
)
&

..$'
#


&
9>?W<?=F?F7G;XA9<<?=;:A??K?=<6D<E?@;A<9?>YZ6<E9=:9=<E9>[?B<96=>E;889=E979<;@;A<GH>

*
$4.$
5
'
$)
#L

\
]
2$)$

3.

&


#
&+
5$$)

)
2
#$''
+
5$
$-


$ $&''+&'
5
&

$''),
#
'&+)



&


&


.






&&
.+'-L2$).$
''+$'.
5')
&#&5+$
5$$&

5&$&)$-


&'
5
&

$#
&,
^_`abcdefeghi_jhk^lmnopfoqrstoqusvwxnsutomsryytnuwrtmfx 


 









 







 




!"#$ 
%&&&'


()
*


*+

,-./0



1

/
,2
2 



3


44%56775&06-
'




8
 9  /
 


#:; <<=>?@AB$"<?<A?< $=?#
C

)
.77
D

D

 E0'%+.



+'D
3


C&5005--CCF

0C.6
'





8
 9 



 D

G



?HIJKLMJNLOK
PQRSTUVTWXYQZZX
[RR\]PQRSPZX^_
`aabX^\T\cR^XXR
VTWXYQZZXdP[efghi
3


jeagkhhlmfng`
'


oQRSoZX^_p^TWXYQZZXqorqsW

'














  








4tu9

vw xxLIKyzKN:{







  


  


  




 







F






 




 

   




 


|


 





 

 






93



 
 






 


 



9

}w"KNLHz IHzzyzKN:3









  
 
9{  












  
 

 
 



  

 


 



 

 

 











  

 

 
 ~
 9D

G


(






 





 






93






F










 G


 


9{  




  


 
€‚ƒ„
†‡†ˆ‰Š€‹‰ŒŽ‘‡’“”•’–”—˜™”–•Ž”“šš•–˜“•Ž‡™


 
 





 
 

 











 








 












 






 !"
#$%$&'()*+


 






,

-





-

.









+


/











,
.

.


,

0

 . 

  .



1



-
2
3,0..1-2




 



. 

 4


56#%(789:;#9




 








/
















<




 




































 



 

 











&=
"
#(8%7%>9*+




  







 









 







 








 













 







/

 


 


 


 
?




 
 





















4@(%"
#*0







 



 









 
A








 

 




 





 


















4B!;$>
#C(#>D*+


/





3




EFG




4

 /

 













 


 








<4H
7(>%!$DI%C*+















 












 







<









 

 


 





0
















































0






 





















 



J4K77!L(>%!$!5H%DM*



 
J