any fence or wall constructed along a common property line shall be determined by using the finished grade of the highest contiguous parcel.
c. The height of a fence or wall may be increased a maximum of one foot to provide for noise attenuation or buffering of adjacent land uses, subject to approval of an Administrative Permit. Fences and walls in excess of eight feet may be permitted subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit.
d. The provisions of this section shall not apply to any fence or wall required by any law or regulation of the City or State.
5. Flag Poles. The pole may be a maximum of 35 feet in height and shall maintain a minimum five-foot setback from any property line.
6. Security facilities, including security gates and gate houses at a project entrance.
7. Antennas, including HAM radio, radio and television receiving antennas subject to requirements of Chapter 19 .34.
8. Children's play equipment, including playsets, playhouses and tree houses.
9. Recreation facilities, including recreation activity courts and facilities (excluding associated fencing and netting), swimming pools, spas and hot tubs, which are customarily associated with residential use, are permitted in the rear and side yards. Recreational facilities shall not include automated pitching equipment or similar noise generating recreation equipment not typically associated with residential use.
10.Satellite Dishes. Satellite dishes as allowed in Chapter 19.34.
11.Entry Arbors. Entry arbors may be located within the required front yard setback provided they do not cover more than 25 square feet in area and do not exceed a height of 10 feet.
12.Landscape Features. Landscape features including fountains less than seven feet in height may be located within the front yard setback provided the feature is located outside of the clear vision triangle and does not exceed 25 square feet in area.
13.Mailboxes. United States Postal Service (USPS) mailboxes may be located within the required front yard setback provided the mailbox is located outside of the clear vision triangle and does not exceed six square feet in area. The mailbox must also comply with the USPS requirements.
14.Outdoor Living Elements. Outdoor living elements including, but not limited to, outdoor fireplaces and outdoor kitchens, are not permitted in the required front yard and shall adhere to the development requirements for enclosed accessory structures.
15.Shipping Containers. Shipping containers are not ordinarily and customarily associated with residential uses and are prohibited on residential property.
16.Exceptions to Setbacks. Notwithstanding the requirements of subsection A of this section, the following structures are permitted to encroach into the required development setbacks, as follows:
a. Architectural features, such as, but not limited to: cornices, eaves and similar features, but not any flat wall may encroach up to two feet into any required setback.
17.Exceptions to Accessory Structure Requirements. Unless otherwise noted that a Conditional Use Permit is required, an exception to the requirements of this section may be approved subject to the approval of an Administrative Permit.
D. Permitted Accessory Structures to Dwelling Use Type (Multi-Family).
1. Bicycle lockers and off-street parking areas.
2. Decks and Balconies. Uncovered decks under 30 inches in height at the top of the deck sheathing are permitted anywhere on a parcel, without respect to required setbacks. Any deck or balcony (uncovered or covered) of 30 inches or taller in height, when measured as outlined in Section 19.95.030(H)(1)(Height , Building and Other Structures), shall maintain a minimum side yard setback of two times the required interior side yard setback for the primary structure, a rear
yard setback of one-half the required rear yard setback for the primary structure, a 10-foot front yard setback, and shall be located consistent with the residential clear vision triangle requirements of Section 19.10.030(8.)
3. Unenclosed structures, including detached shade structures, covered patios, arbors, and gazebos located on the ground floor. Such structures are subject to the following requirements:
a. The structure shall not enclose any area equal to or greater than 20 percent on any side; b. The structure shall not be constructed of materials which would create a year round livable area;
c. The structure shall not exceed 15 feet in height and one story. For each foot in height above 10 feet the required setback, except the front yard setback, shall be increased by one foot; d. The structure shall maintain a 15-foot front yard setback and a five-foot rear and side yard setback;
e. On the street side of a corner lot, the structure shall maintain a five-foot setback as measured from the back of the sidewalk or, in the absence of a sidewalk, the right-of-way; f. On the street side of a corner lot located adjacent to a key lot, the structure shall maintain a 10-foot setback as measured from the back of the sidewalk or right-of-way; and g. The size or location of the structure does not violate any requirements of an approved site review, design review or Administrative Permit.
4. Fences and Walls. A maximum seven-foot high fence (including lattice and similar attachments) or wall may be located anywhere on a parcel consistent with the following requirements:
a. The maximum height shall be reduced to three feet if located:
i. Within a residential or residential driveway clear vision triangle (see Chapter 19.95, Definitions);
ii. Within a required front setback; or
iii. Within five feet of the back of the sidewalk of a street side for a corner lot. In the absence of a sidewalk, the five-foot setback is measured from the back of the right-of-way. b. When there is a difference in the ground level between two adjoining parcels, the height of any fence or wall constructed along a common property line shall be determined by using the finished grade of the highest contiguous parcel.
c. The height of a fence or wall may be increased a maximum of one foot to provide for noise attenuation or buffering of adjacent land uses, subject to approval of an Administrative Permit. Fences and walls in excess of eight feet may be permitted subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit.
d. The provisions of this section shall not apply to any fence or wall required by any law or regulation of the City or State.
5. Flag Poles. The pole may be a maximum of 35 feet in height and shall maintain a minimum fivefoot setback from any property line.
6. Security facilities, including security gates and gate houses at a project entrance.
7. Antennas, including HAM radio, radio and television receiving antennas subject to the requirements of Chapter 19.34.
8. Recreation facilities, including recreation activity courts and facilities, children's play equipment, swimming pools, spas and hot tubs.
9. Satellite Dishes. Satellite dishes as allowed in Chapter 19.34.
10.Signs, as permitted by Title 17 of this Code.
11.Transit facilities.
12.Trash enclosures and recycling facilities.
13.Exceptions to Accessory Structure Requirements . Unless otherwise noted that a Conditional Use Permit is required, an exception to the requirements of this section may be approved subject to the approval of an Administrative Permit.
E. Permitted Accessory Structures to Commercial and Industrial Use Types.
1. Bicycle lockers, and off-street parking areas and structures.
2. Unenclosed structures, including arbors and gazebos.
3. Detached enclosed storage.
4. Detached unenclosed storage buildings and pole buildings associated with the outdoor display of building materials, nursery stock, or other materials which are typically displayed outdoors or under a canopy.
5. Fences and walls, except that no fence or wall in excess of three feet may be located within a commercial clear vision triangle (see Definition);
6. Flag Poles. The pole may be a maximum of 35 feet in height and shall maintain a minimum fivefoot setback from any property line.
7. Security facilities, including security gates and gate houses at a project entrance.
8. Antennas, including HAM radio, radio and television receiving antennas subject to the requirements of Chapter 19.34.
9. Recreation facilities, including recreation activity courts and facilities for use by employees.
10.Satellite Dishes. Satellite dishes as allowed in Chapter 19.34.
11.Signs, as permitted by Title 17 of this Code.
12.Transit facilities.
13.Trash enclosures and recycling facilities.
F. Prohibited Accessory Uses and Structures Within All Zone Districts and Use Types.
1. Outdoor Storage. Storage of loose rubbish, garbage, junk or their receptacles shall not be visible from any public right-of-way. Outdoor storage of other materials and equipment may be permitted consistent with the use types and permit requirements of Article II of this title.
2. Vehicles for Sale. No vehicles shall be stored or displayed for sale on any undeveloped parcel or on any property zoned for commercial or industrial uses except where authorized for automobile sales pursuant to this title.
3. Fences. The use of barbed wire, electrified fence, razor wire or similar security devices in conjunction with any fence, wall, or hedge, or by itself is prohibited, except in the following circumstances:
a. For security purposes in non-residential zones, where the barbed wire, electrified wire, or razor wire is located a minimum of six feet above the ground; b. Where property is zoned urban reserve and is still being primarily utilized for agricultural purposes; and
c. Where required by any permit condition, law or regulation of the City or state
Title 19 Zoning
Article Ill. General Development Regulations Chapter
19.20 Chapter 19.26. OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING
§ 19.26.030. Parking space requirements by use type.
C. Adjustment to Number of Required Parking Spaces. The number of parking spaces required by subsection A may be reduced as follows:
1. Specific Plan Provisions. Provisions may be made in a specific plan to allow reductions in the number of required parking spaces based upon special provisions, such as providing golf cart or electric car parking where special provisions are made for golf carts or electric cars.
Parking Reductions for Shared Parking. If an applicant believes the number of parking spaces required for their building complex as specified in subsection A (which is the sum of all the users within the building complex) is not applicable because the hours of operation of different tenants/uses within the building complex will effectively allow for dual use of the parking spaces then the applicant may request an Administrative Permit. The Approving Authority shall be the Planning Manager. The applicant shall have the burden of proof for requesting a reduction in the total number of required off-street parking spaces, and documentation shall be submitted substantiating this request. Shared parking reductions shall only be approved by the Approving Authority if:
a. A sufficient number of spaces are provided to meet the greatest parking demand of the participating uses;
b. Satisfactory evidence is provided describing the nature of the uses and the times when the uses operate so as to demonstrate the lack of potential conflict between them;
c. Overflow parking will not impact any adjacent use; and d. Additional documents, covenants, deed restrictions, or other agreements as may be deemed necessary by the Planning Manager are executed to assure that the required parking spaces provided are maintained and uses with similar hours and parking requirements as those uses sharing the parking facilities remain for the life of the project.
2. Parking Reductions for an Individual Use. If an applicant for a proposed use believes the number of parking spaces required for their use as specified in subsection A is not applicable because their use functions differently than the generic use type and associated parking standards established in this title, then the applicant may request an Administrative Permit. The Approving Authority shall be the Planning Manager. The applicant shall have the burden of proof for
requesting a reduction in the total number of required off-street parking spaces, and documentation shall be submitted substantiating the request. Such documentation may include, but is not limited to: a parking study of another facility of the same use which is similar in size and operation, calculating the required parking spaces with field data of peak parking usage. Reduced parking shall only be approved by the Approving Authority if:
a. Satisfactory evidence is provided describing the nature of the use, the operation and data from other facilities or similar facilities so as to demonstrate that the required parking standards are excessive and the proposed parking standards are appropriate; and
b. Overflow parking will not impact any adjacent use.
3. Parking Reductions for Eating and Drinking Establishments. The Approving Authority for any application for a parking reduction by an eating and drinking establishment as defined in Section 19.08.090(L) shall be the Planning Manager.
The Planning Commission shall be the Approving Authority for any application requesting a parking reduction where the request would result in a cumulative parking reduction of 15% or more for the center in which the eating and drinking establishment is located.
Title 19 Zoning
Article Ill. General Development Regulations Chapter
19.20 Chapter 19.28. RESIDENTIAL DENSITY BONUS
§ 19.28.040. Eligibility for bonus.
A developer of a housing development containing five or more units may qualify for a density bonus and at least one other incentive as provided by this chapter if the developer does one of the following:
A. Agrees to construct and maintain at least five percent of the units for rental or sale dedicated to very low income households (includes a shared housing building development, in which case minimum unit size or bedroom requirements shall not conflict with the definition of "shared housing building"); B. Agrees to construct and maintain at least 10 percent of the units for rental or sale dedicated to lower income households (includes a shared housing building development, in which case minimum unit size or bedroom requirements shall not conflict with the definition of "shared housing building"); C. Agrees to construct and maintain at least 10 percent of the units of a housing development to be sold to moderate income households, provided that all units in the development are offered to the public for purchase, consistent with Government Code Section 65915, as may be amended from time to time; D. Agrees to construct and maintain a senior citizen housing development, as defined in Sections 51.3 and 51.12 of the California Civil Code, or a mobilehome park that limits residency based on age requirements for housing for older persons pursuant to Section 798.76 or 799.5 of the California Civil Code, as may be amended from time to time. For the purposes of this subparagraph, “development” includes a shared housing building development and a residential care facility for the elderly, as defined in Section 1569.2 of the Health and Safety Code.
E. Donates land to the City dedicated for the construction of very low income units pursuant to Section 19.28.080 of this chapter;
F. Includes a qualifying child care facility as described in Section 19.28.070 of this chapter in addition to providing housing as described in subsections A through C of this section;
G. Agrees to construct and maintain at least 10 percent of the units of a housing development for transitional foster youth, as defined in Section 66025.9 of the California Education Code, as may be amended from time to time, disabled
veterans, as defined in Section 18541 of the California Government Code, as may be amended from time to time, or homeless persons, as defined in the Federal McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. Section 11301 et seq.), as may be amended from time to time, dedicated to very low income households;
H. Agrees to construct and maintain at least 20 percent of the units for lower income students in a student housing development pursuant to Section
19.28.085 of this chapter; or
I. Agrees to construct and maintain 100 percent of the units, including total units and density bonus units, but exclusive of a manager's unit or units, dedicated to lower income households, except that up to 20 percent of the units, including total units and density bonus units, may be dedicated to moderate income households (includes a shared housing building development). § 19.2 8.060. Eligibility and application requirements for incentives.
A. Available Incentives. A housing development qualifying for a density bonus may be entitled to at least one incentive. Incentives may include, but are not limited to:
1. A reduction in site development standards such as:
a. Reduced minimum lot sizes and/or dimensions.
b. Reduced minimum lot setbacks.
c. Reduced minimum outdoor and/or private outdoor living area. d. Increased maximum lot coverage.
e. Increased maximum building height and/or stories.
f. Reduced on-site parking requirements.
g. Reduced street standards.
2. A reduction in architectural design requirements.
3. A density bonus greater than the amount required by this chapter.
4. Other regulatory incentives proposed by the developer or the City, which result in identifiable, financially sufficient, and actual cost reductions.
B. Parking Requirements. If an applicant qualifies for a density bonus pursuant to this chapter, the applicant may request, in addition to any requested incentive(s), that reduced parking requirements be applied to the project in place of the City's current parking requirements. The parking requirement is inclusive of accessible
and guest parking for the entire housing development, but shall not include onstreet parking spaces in the count towards the parking requirement. The housing development may provide on-site parking through tandem or uncovered parking, but not through on-street parking. In calculating the number of parking spaces required for a development,
if the total number of parking spaces is other than a whole number, the number shall be rounded up to the next whole number.
1. Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, the following parking requirements shall apply:
a. One bedspace in a student housing development, as defined by Section 65915 of the Government Code, as may be amended from time to time:
zero parking spaces.
b. Zero to one bedroom: one on-site parking space.
c. Two to three bedrooms: one and one-half on-site parking spaces. d. Four or more bedrooms: two and one-half on-site parking spaces.
2. If the housing development includes at least 20 percent lower income units or at least 11 percent very low income units, is located within one-half mile of a major transit stop, and there is unobstructed access to the major transit stop from the development, then the parking requirement shall be one-half on-site parking space per unit.
3. If a housing development consists solely of rental units, exclusive of a manager's unit or units, with an affordable housing cost to lower income families, as provided in Section 50052.5 of the California Health and Safety Code as may be amended from time to time, then no parking spaces shall be required as long as the development meets either of the following criteria:
a. The development is located within one-half mile of a major transit stop and there is unobstructed access to the major transit stop from the development; or
b. The development is a for-rent housing development for individuals who are 62 years of age or older that complies with Sections 51.2 and 51.3 of the California Civil Code as may be amended from time to time, and the development has either paratransit service or unobstructed access, within one-half mile, to fixed bus route service that operates at least eight times per day.
4. If a housing development consists solely of rental units, exclusive of a manager's unit or units, with an affordable housing cost to lower income families, as provided in Section 50052.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, as may be amended from time to time, and the development is either a special needs housing development, as defined in Section 51312 of the California Health and Safety Code, as may be amended from time to time, or a supportive housing development, as defined in Section 50675.14 of the California Health and Safety Code, as may be amended from time to time, then no parking spaces shall be required. A development that is a special needs housing development shall have either paratransit service or unobstructed
access, within one-half mile, to fixed bus route service that operates at least eight times per day.
5. Upon the request of the developer, the parking requirement (inclusive of parking for persons with a disability and guests) shall be 0.5 spaces per bedroom if all of the following are met:
a. The housing development includes at least 40 percent moderate income units and at least
10 percent of the units of the housing development are sold to moderate income households, provided that all units in the development are offered to the public for purchase; and
b. The housing development is located within one-half mile of a major transit stop, as defined in Public Resources Code Section 21155(b), as may be amended from time to time; and
c. The residents of the development have unobstructed access to the major transit stop from the development.
C. Eligibility for Incentives. Incentives are available to a housing developer as follows:
1. One incentive for housing developments that: (a) restrict at least 10 percent of the total units to lower income households, at least five percent for very low income households, or at least 10 percent for persons and families of moderate income in a development in which the units are for sale; or (b) are for senior housing.
2. Once incentive or concession for projects that include at least 20 percent of the total units for lower income students in a student housing development. If a project includes at least 23 percent of the total units for lower income students in a student housing project, the applicant shall instead receive two incentives or concessions.
3. Two incentives for housing developments that restrict at least 17 percent of the total units to lower income households, at least 10 percent for very low income households, or at least 20 percent for persons and families of moderate income in a development in which the units are for sale.
4. Three incentives for housing developments that restrict at least 24 percent of the total units for lower income households, at least 15 percent for very low income households, or at least 30 percent for persons and families of moderate income in a development in which the units are for sale.
5. Five incentives for housing developments that restrict 100 percent of the units, including total units and density bonus units, but exclusive of a manager's unit or units, dedicated to lower income households, except that up to 20 percent of the units, including total units and density bonus units, may be dedicated to moderate income households. If the project is located within one-half mile of a major transit stop, the applicant shall also receive a height increase of up to three additional stories, or 33 feet.
6. One incentive for projects that include at least 20 percent of the total units for lower income students in a student housing development.
7. Four incentives for projects that include at least 16 percent of the units for very low income households or at least 45 percent for persons and families of moderate income in a development in which the units are for sale. § 19.28.085. Student housing.
A. Student Housing Density Bonus Requirements. In order for a student housing development to be eligible for a density bonus under Section 19.28.040 of this chapter, the student housing development must meet the following requirements:
1. All units in the student housing development shall be used exclusively for undergraduate, graduate, or professional students enrolled full time at an institution of higher education accredited by the Western Association of Schools and Colleges or the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges. The developer shall, as a condition of receiving a certificate of occupancy, provide evidence to the City that the developer has entered into an operating agreement or master lease with one or more institutions of higher education for the institution or institutions to occupy all units of the student housing development with students from that institution or institutions.
2. The applicable 20 percent units shall be used for lower income students. For purposes of this clause, "lower income students" means students who have a household income and asset level that does not exceed the level for Cal Grant A or Cal Grant B award recipients as set forth in paragraph (1) of subdivision (k) of Section 69432.7 of the California Education Code.
3. The rent provided in the applicable units of the development for lower income students shall be calculated at 30 percent of 65 percent of the area median income for a single-room occupancy unit type.
4. The development shall provide priority for the applicable affordable units for lower income students experiencing homelessness.
5. For student housing developments that meet the aforementioned criteria, the density bonus shall be 35 percent of the student housing units.
B. Definition of Units. For purposes of calculating a density bonus granted for a student housing development, the term "unit" means one rental bed and its pro rata share of associated common area facilities.
Title 19. Zoning
Article IV. Special Area and Specific Use
Requirements Chapter 19.30
Chapter 19.33. Commercial Corridor Specific Plans
§ 19.33.030. Permitted uses.
A. General. Land uses within the Corridor Plans are implemented through application of zone districts. In recognition of the goals of the Corridor Plans this special area district (“District”) applies to all Multifamily Residential (R3), Business Professional (BP), Neighborhood Commercial (NC), Community Commercial (CC), and General Commercial (GC) zone districts within the Specific Plan boundaries within the Corridor Plans. The district standards do not apply to any zone districts not listed in the tables below, such as the Single-Family (R1), Small-Lot (RS), or Two-Family (R2) Residential zone districts. The district customizes the permitted uses of general zone districts to reflect the unique nature and community character goals of the Specific Plan.
B. Permitted Use Types. Use tables are provided for each of the three Corridor Plans.
The tables specify permitted uses, conditionally permitted uses, administratively permitted uses, and prohibited uses for certain zoning designations within the Specific Plan. Principally permitted uses (P) indicate that the use is allowed in the specified zone. Conditionally and administratively permitted uses require the granting of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) or Administrative Permit (A), respectively, as provided in Chapters 19.72 and 19.74 of the Roseville Municipal Code. Prohibited uses (-) are not allowed in the specified zone district. Use type classifications are defined in Chapter
19.08 of the Roseville Municipal Code. This district relies on the classification system and definitions established in the Roseville Municipal Code.
A zone district which is not listed within the tables below is regulated in accordance with Article II of Title 19. A use which is listed within the permitted use tables of Article II of Title 19, but is not listed below is generally prohibited. Where a use is not specifically listed in either Article II of Title 19 or the tables below, the Planning Manager may determine whether the use is generally consistent or of the same general character as one or more listed uses to determine whether the use is permitted. Existing buildings, structures, and uses permitted within the Specific Plan area as of the effective date of this chapter shall continue to be permitted and exempt from the requirements of this chapter as legal nonconforming.
ATLANTIC STREET CORRIDOR PERMITTED USE TABLE
CC GC R3
AGRICULTURAL AND OPEN SPACE USE TYPES
Animal Keeping - - P
Resource Protection and Restoration P P P
Resource Related Recreation P P P
CIVIC USE TYPES
Community Assembly P P P
Community Services P P CUP
Essential Services P P P
Hospital Services
General Hospital Services P CUP -
Psychiatric Hospital Services P CUP -
Libraries and Museums, Private P P -
Public Parking Services P P -
Schools
College and University P P -
Public/Private Elementary and Secondary CUP CUP CUP
Social Services
Emergency Shelter(1) CUP CUP -
Food Distribution(2) CUP A/CUP -
Food Service(3) CUP A/CUP -
Power Generating Facilities(4)
Emergency A A P
Supplemental/Individual Use CUP CUP P
Passive Power P P P
CC GC R3
RESIDENTIAL USE TYPES
Accessory Dwelling Units(5) P P P
Caretaker/Employee Housing P P P
Community Care Facilities, Small P P P
Community Care Facilities, Large P P P
Dwelling(7)
Multi-Family P(18) - P(18)
Single-Family P/CUP(8) CUP P
Two-Family P/CUP(8) CUP P
Family Day Care Home, Small P P P
Family Day Care Home, Large(9) P P P
Live/Work P P P
Long Term Care Facility, Small(10) - - P
Long Term Care Facility, Large - - A
Low-Barrier Navigation Centers(11) - - P
Mobile Home Park - - CUP
Rooming and Boarding House - - P
Short-Term Rental(12) - - P
Single Room Occupant - - -
COMMERCIAL USE TYPES
Animal Sales and Service
Grooming and Pet Stores P P -
Kennels - CUP -
Veterinary Clinic P P -
Veterinary Hospital CUP CUP -
Automotive and Equipment
Automotive Body and Equipment Repair - P/CUP(13)-
Automotive Rentals - P -
Automotive Repairs CUP P -
Automotive Sales CUP P -
Car Wash and Detailing CUP P -
Gasoline Sales(14) P/CUP P/CUP -
Heavy Equipment Rental and Sales - P -
Banks and Financial Services P P -
Bars and Drinking Places P P -
Broadcasting and Recording Studios P P -
Business Support Services P P -
Commercial Recreation
Amusement Center P P -
Indoor Entertainment P P -
Indoor Sports and Recreation P P -
Large Amusement Complexes P CUP -
Outdoor Entertainment P CUP -
Outdoor Sports and Recreation P P A
Day Care Center P P A
Eating and Drinking Establishments
Fast Food with Drive-Through(14) P/CUP P/CUP -
Convenience P P -
Full Service P P -
Food and Beverage Retail Sales P P -
Funeral and Interment Services P P -
Lodging Services P P -
Long Term Care Facility P P -
Maintenance and Repair P P -
Medical Services, General P P -
Neighborhood Commercial P - -
Nightclubs(15) CUP CUP -
Nursery, Retail P P -
Offices, Professional P P -
Personal Services P P -
Retail Sales and Services P P -
Specialized Education and Training
Vocational Schools P P -
Specialty Schools P P -
Storage, Personal Storage Facility - P -
CC GC R3
INDUSTRIAL USE TYPES
Laundries, Commercial CUP CUP -
Printing and Publishing - CUP -
Research Services - P -
Wholesaling and Distribution, Light - P -
TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATION USE TYPES
Intermodal Facilities(16) CUP CUP -
Telecommunication Facilities(17) P/A/CUP P/A/CUP P/A/CUP Notes:
(1) Additional requirements are contained in Chapter 19.38. (2) Additional requirements are contained in Chapter 19.40. (3) Additional requirements are contained in Chapter 19.39.
(4) Additional requirements are contained in Chapter 19.55. (5) Accessory dwelling/junior accessory dwelling units are only permitted within areas zoned to allow single-family, two-family or multi-family residential use and must be located on a lot that contains an existing or proposed single-family, two-family or multi-family dwelling unit as defined in Sections 19.08.080(F)(1)—(F)(3) (Residential Use Types). See Chapter 19.60 for additional accessory dwelling/junior accessory dwelling unit regulations. (6) Multi-family residential is principally permitted without a Conditional Use Permit in the GC zone where residential uses already existed on a site prior to adoption of this Specific Plan. (7) Transitional housing and supportive housing are residential uses types and are permitted (P) where residential uses are permitted (P) or conditionally permitted (CUP). (8) Single-family and two-family uses are permitted at minimum densities of 23 units/acre, but otherwise require a Conditional Use Permit, except that any parcel in a residential zone district may be developed with two singlefamily homes. (9) See Chapter 19.46 for large family day care home regulations. (10) A long-term care facility which serves six or fewer persons shall be considered a residential use of the property. (11) Low barrier navigation centers are exempt from a Design Review Permit. (12) Short-term rentals are only permitted in a single-family dwelling unit. See Chapter 4.25 for additional short-term rental requirements.
(13) A Conditional Use Permit is required for auto body and equipment repair uses which are within 300 feet of a residential zone (R1, R2, RS, or R3) or a single-family or multi-family home, and if located outside of this buffer are principally permitted.
(14) A Conditional Use Permit is required for fast food with drive through establishments or gasoline sales establishments contiguous to: (a) properties with a residential zoning designation; (b) parcels designated as a public utilities easement or landscape easement which are contiguous to a property having a residential zoning designation; and (c) any other parcel of land upon which a building cannot be developed and which separates the subject parcel by less than 100 feet which is contiguous to a property having a residential zoning designation. A Conditional Use Permit is not required for these uses if the subject parcel is separated from properties with a residential zoning designation by a public roadway. (15) Additional requirements are contained in Chapter 19.49. (16) Additional requirements are contained in Chapter 19.36. (17) Additional requirements are contained in Chapter 19.34. (18) Multifamily uses are permitted at minimum densities of 20 units/acre. Projects on single parcels less than or equal to 0.5 acres which have an existing single-family structure that was built before 2025 are exempted from this minimum density requirement.
DOUGLAS-HARDING CORRIDOR PERMITTED USE TABLE
BP NC CC GC R3
AGRICULTURAL AND OPEN SPACE USE TYPES
Animal Keeping - - - - P
Resource Protection and Restoration P P P P P
Resource Related Recreation P P P P P
CIVIC USE TYPES
Community Assembly CUP P P P P
Community Services P CUP P P CUP
Essential Services P P P P P
Hospital Services
General Hospital Services - - CUP CUP -
Psychiatric Hospital Services - - CUP CUP -
Libraries and Museums, Private - CUP P P -
Public Parking Services P P P P -
Schools
College and University A - P P -
Public/Private Elementary and
Secondary
- CUP CUP CUP CUP
Social Services
Emergency Shelter(1) - - - CUP -
Food Distribution(2) - - - A/CUP -
Food Service(3) - - - A/CUP -
Power Generating Facilities(4)
Emergency A A A A P
Supplemental/Individual Use CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP
Passive Power P P P P P
RESIDENTIAL USE TYPES
Accessory Dwelling Units(5) - P P P P
Caretaker/Employee Housing - P P P P
Community Care Facilities, Small P P P P P
Community Care Facilities, Large CUP CUP CUP CUP P
Dwelling(6)
Multi-Family - P(16) P(16) - P(16)
Single-Family - P/CUP(7) P/CUP(7) P/CUP(7) P
Two-Family - P/CUP(7) P/CUP(7) P/CUP(7) P
Family Day Care Home, Small P P P P -
Family Day Care Home, Large(8) - P P P P
Live/Work P P P - P
Long Term Care Facility, Small(9) - - - - CUP
Long Term Care Facility, Large - - - - P
Low-Barrier Navigation Centers(10) - P P - P
Mobile Home Park - - - - CUP
Rooming and Boarding House - - - - P
Short-Term Rental(11) - - - - P
Single Room Occupant P P P P P
COMMERCIAL USE TYPES
Animal Sales and Service
Grooming and Pet Stores - P P P -
Kennels - - - CUP -
Veterinary Clinic - CUP P P -
Veterinary Hospital - - CUP CUP -
Automotive and Equipment
Automotive Body and
Equipment Repair
-
-
- CUP -
Automotive Rentals - - - P -
Automotive Repairs - - CUP P -
Automotive Sales - - CUP P -
Car Wash and Detailing - - CUP P -
Gasoline Sales(12) CUP P/CUP P/CUP P/CUP -
Heavy Equipment Rental and
Sales
- - - P -
Banks and Financial Services P P P P -
Bars and Drinking Places - - P P -
Broadcasting and Recording Studios P - - P -
Business Support Services P - P P -
Commercial Recreation
Amusement Center - CUP P P -
Indoor Entertainment - - P P -
Indoor Sports and Recreation - - P P -
Large Amusement Complexes - - - CUP -
Outdoor Entertainment - - - CUP -
Outdoor Sports and Recreation - - - P -
Day Care Center P P P P P
Eating and Drinking Establishments
Fast Food with Drive-Through(12) - - P/CUP P/CUP -
Convenience P P P P -
Full Service P P P P -
Food and Beverage Retail Sales - - P P -
Funeral and Interment Services - - P P -
Lodging Services - - P P -
Long Term Care Facility CUP CUP P P CUP
Maintenance and Repair - P P P -
Medical Services, General P P P P -
Neighborhood Commercial P P - - A
Nightclubs(13) - - CUP CUP -
Nursery, Retail - - - P -
Offices, Professional P P P P -
Personal Services P P P P -
Retail Sales and Services - - P P -
Specialized Education and Training
Vocational Schools - - P P -
Specialty Schools - CUP P P -
BP NC CC GC R3
INDUSTRIAL USE TYPES
Laundries, Commercial - - CUP CUP -
Printing and Publishing - - - CUP -
Research Services - - - P -
Wholesaling and Distribution, Light - - - P -
TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATION USE TYPES
Intermodal Facilities(14) CUP CUP CUP CUP -
Telecommunication Facilities(15) P/A/CUP P/A/CUP P/A/CUP P/A/CUP A/CUP
Notes:
(1) Additional requirements are contained in Chapter 19.38. (2) Additional requirements are contained in Chapter 19.40. (3) Additional requirements are contained in Chapter 19.39. (4) Additional requirements are contained in Chapter 19.55. (5) Accessory dwelling/junior accessory dwelling units are only permitted within areas zoned to allow single-family, two-family or multi-family residential use and must be located on a lot that contains an existing or proposed single-family, two-family or multifamily dwelling unit as defined in Sections 19.08.080(F)(1)—(F)(3) (Residential Use Types). See Chapter 19.60 for additional accessory dwelling/junior accessory dwelling unit regulations. (6) Transitional housing and supportive housing are residential uses types and are permitted (P) where residential uses are permitted (P) or conditionally permitted (CUP).
(7) Single-family and two-family uses are permitted at minimum densities of 23 units/acre, but otherwise require a Conditional Use Permit, except that any parcel in a residential zone district may be developed with two single-family homes. (8) See Chapter 19.46 for large family day care home regulations. (9) A long-term care facility which serves six or fewer persons shall be considered a residential use of the property. (10) Low barrier navigation centers are exempt from a Design Review Permit. (11) Short-term rentals are only permitted in a single-family dwelling unit. See Chapter 4.25 for additional short-term rental requirements.
(12) A Conditional Use Permit is required for fast food with drive through establishments or gasoline sales establishments contiguous to: (a) properties with a residential zoning designation; (b) parcels designated as a public utilities easement or landscape easement which are contiguous to a property having a residential zoning designation; and (c) any other parcel of land upon which a building cannot be developed and which separates the subject parcel by less than 100 feet which is contiguous to a property having a residential zoning designation. A Conditional Use Permit is not required for these uses if the subject parcel is separated from properties with a residential zoning designation by a public roadway. (13) Additional requirements are contained in Chapter 19.49. (14) Additional requirements are contained in Chapter 19.36. (15) Additional requirements are contained in Chapter 19.34. (16) Multifamily uses are permitted at minimum densities of 20 units/acre. Projects on single parcels less than or equal to 0.5 acres which have an existing single-family structure that was built before 2025 are exempted from this minimum density requirement.
DOUGLAS-SUNRISE CORRIDOR PERMITTED USE TABLE
BP NC CC GC R3
AGRICULTURAL AND OPEN SPACE USE TYPES
Animal Keeping - - - - P
Resource Protection and Restoration P P P P P
Resource Related Recreation P P P P P
CIVIC USE TYPES
Community Assembly CUP P P P P
Community Services P CUP P P CUP
Essential Services P P P P P
Hospital Services
General Hospital Services - - CUP CUP -
Psychiatric Hospital Services - - CUP CUP -
Libraries and Museums, Private - CUP P P -
Public Parking Services P P P P -
Schools
College and University A - P P -
Public/Private Elementary and
Secondary
- CUP CUP CUP CUP
Social Services
Emergency Shelter(1) - - - CUP -
Food Distribution(2) - - - A/CUP -
Food Service(3)- - - A/CUP -
Power Generating Facilities(4)
Emergency A A A A P
Supplemental/Individual Use CUP CUP CUP CUP P
Passive Power P P P P P
RESIDENTIAL USE TYPES
Accessory Dwelling Units(5) - P P P P
Caretaker/Employee Housing - P P P P
Community Care Facilities, Small P P P P P
Community Care Facilities, Large CUP CUP CUP CUP P
Dwelling(6)
Multi-Family - P(16) P(16) - P(16)
Single-Family - P/CUP(7) P/CUP(7) P/CUP(7) P
Two-Family - P/CUP(7) P/CUP(7) P/CUP(7) P
Family Day Care Home, Small P P P P P
Family Day Care Home, Large(8) - P P P P
Live/Work P P P - P
Long Term Care Facility, Small(9) - - - - P
Long Term Care Facility, Large - - - - A
Low-Barrier Navigation Centers(10) - P P - P
Mobile Home Park - - - - CUP
Rooming and Boarding House - - - - P
Short-Term Rental(11) - - - - P
Single Room Occupant - - - - -
COMMERCIAL USE TYPES
Animal Sales and Service
Grooming and Pet Stores - P P P -
Kennels - - - CUP -
Veterinary Clinic - CUP P P -
Veterinary Hospital - - CUP CUP -
Automotive and Equipment
Automotive Body and Equipment
Repair
-
-
- CUP -
Automotive Rentals - - - P -
Automotive Repairs - - CUP P -
Automotive Sales - - CUP P -
Car Wash and Detailing - - CUP P -
Gasoline Sales(12) CUP P/CUP P/CUP P/CUP -
Heavy Equipment Rental and Sales - - - P -
Banks and Financial Services P P P P -
Bars and Drinking Places - - P P -
Broadcasting and Recording Studios P - P P -
Business Support Services P - P P -
Commercial Recreation
Amusement Center - CUP P P -
Indoor Entertainment - - P P -
Indoor Sports and Recreation - - P P -
Large Amusement Complexes - - P CUP -
Outdoor Entertainment - - P CUP -
Outdoor Sports and Recreation - - P P A
Day Care Center P P P P A
Eating and Drinking Establishments
Fast Food with Drive-Through(12)- - P/CUP P/CUP -
Convenience P P P P -
Full Service P P P P -
Food and Beverage Retail Sales - - P P -
Funeral and Interment Services - - P P -
Lodging Services - - P P -
Long Term Care Facility CUP CUP P P -
Maintenance and Repair - P P P -
Medical Services, General P P P P -
Neighborhood Commercial P P P - -
Nightclubs(13) - - CUP CUP -
Nursery, Retail - - P P -
Offices, Professional P P P P -
Personal Services P P P P -
Retail Sales and Services - - P P -
Specialized Education and Training
Vocational Schools - - P P -
Specialty Schools - CUP P P -
Storage, Personal Storage Facility - - - P -
BP NC CC GC R3
INDUSTRIAL USE TYPES
Laundries, Commercial - - CUP CUP -
Printing and Publishing - - - CUP -
Research Services - - - P -
Wholesaling and Distribution, Light - - - P -
TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATION USE TYPES
Intermodal Facilities(14) CUP CUP CUP CUP -
Telecommunication Facilities(15) P/A/CUP P/A/CUP P/A/CUP P/A/CUP A/CUP Notes:
(1) Additional requirements are contained in Chapter 19.38. (2) Additional requirements are contained in Chapter 19.40. (3) Additional requirements are contained in Chapter 19.39. (4) Additional requirements are contained in Chapter 19.55. (5) Accessory dwelling/junior accessory dwelling units are only permitted within areas zoned to allow single-family, two-family or multi-family residential use and must be located on a lot that contains an existing or proposed single-family, two-family or multifamily dwelling unit as defined in Sections 19.08.080(F)(1)—(F)(3) (Residential Use Types). See Chapter 19.60 for additional accessory dwelling/junior accessory dwelling unit regulations. (6) Transitional housing and supportive housing are residential uses types and are permitted (P) where residential uses are permitted (P) or conditionally permitted (CUP).
(7) Single-family and two-family uses are permitted at minimum densities of 23 units/acre, but otherwise require a Conditional Use Permit, except that any parcel in a residential zone district may be developed with two single-family homes. (8) See Chapter 19.46 for large family day care home regulations. (9) A long-term care facility which serves six or fewer persons shall be considered a residential use of the property. (10) Low barrier navigation centers are exempt from a Design Review Permit. (11) Short-term rentals are only permitted in a single-family dwelling unit. See Chapter 4.25 for additional short-term rental requirements.
(12) A Conditional Use Permit is required for fast food with drive through establishments or gasoline sales establishments contiguous to: (a) properties with a residential zoning designation; (b) parcels designated as a public utilities easement or landscape easement which are contiguous to a property having a residential zoning designation; and (c) any other parcel of land upon which a building cannot be developed and which separates the subject parcel by less than 100 feet which is contiguous to a property having a residential zoning designation. A Conditional Use Permit is not required for these uses if the subject parcel is separated from properties with a residential zoning designation by a public roadway. (13) Additional requirements are contained in Chapter 19.49. (14) Additional requirements are contained in Chapter 19.36. (15) Additional requirements are contained in Chapter 19.34. (16) Multifamily uses are permitted at minimum densities of 20 units/acre. Projects on single parcels less than or equal to 0.5 acres which have an existing single-family structure that was built before 2025 are exempted from this minimum density requirement.
C. Uses and Zone Districts Not Listed. A use which is listed within the Roseville Municipal Code, but is not listed in the tables in this chapter is generally prohibited. Where a use is not specifically listed in either the tables in this chapter or within the other sections of Title 19 of the Roseville Municipal Code, the Planning Manager may determine whether the use is generally consistent or
of the same general character as one or more listed uses to determine whether the use is permitted. For parcels within the Single-Family (R1), Small-Lot (RS), or Two-Family (R2) Residential zone district, refer to the list of allowable uses in Section
19.10.020 of this title. For parcels within the Industrial (M2) zone district, refer to the list of allowable uses in Section 19.14.020 of this title. For parcels within the Floodway (FW) and Floodway Fringe (FF) zone district, refer to Section 19.18.040 of this title.
D. Legal Nonconforming Uses. Existing buildings, structures, and uses permitted within the Corridor Plan boundaries as of the effective date of this chapter shall continue to be permitted and exempt from the requirements of this chapter as legal nonconforming. Uses which would require a Conditional Use Permit or Administrative Permit, but which were previously permitted prior to adoption of this District shall be deemed to have obtained the required Conditional Use Permit or Administrative Permit.
(Ord. 6603 § 5, 2023)
Title 19. Zoning
Article IV. Special Area and Specific Use Requirements
Chapter 19.30
Chapter 19.60. ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS
§ 19.60.060. Development standards for accessory dwelling units proposed within existing structures or existing living areas.
Accessory dwelling units are permitted to be developed within existing structures or within the living area of an existing primary dwelling unit. Accessory dwelling units developed within existing structures or living areas shall be allowed only in compliance with the following standards:
A. Setbacks. No setback shall be required for an accessory dwelling unit, including porches, decks, balconies, stairs, and patios which are attached to and for the use of the accessory dwelling unit, built within the footprint and dimensions of an existing living area or existing structure. Garages are subject to the setbacks of Section 19.22.030 (Accessory structures).
B. Floor Area. The total floor area of an attached accessory dwelling unit developed within an existing primary dwelling unit shall not exceed the floor area of the existing primary dwelling unit, except that an expansion of up to 150 square feet beyond the same physical dimensions as the existing primary dwelling unit is permitted for accommodating ingress and egress. The total floor area for a detached accessory dwelling unit developed within an existing detached accessory structure shall not exceed the floor area of the existing detached accessory structure, except that an expansion of up to 150 square feet beyond the same physical dimensions as the existing detached accessory structure is permitted for accommodating ingress and egress.
Expansions beyond 150 square feet must comply with the standards set forth in Section
19.60.070 (Development standards for accessory dwelling units proposed as new construction).
C. Unit Sizes.
1. An accessory dwelling unit shall not be less than the minimum size for an efficiency unit, as defined in Section 17958.1 of the Health and Safety Code, as it now exists or may hereafter be amended.
2. An accessory dwelling unit shall not be more than 850 square feet for a studio or onebedroom or more than 1,000 square feet for an accessory dwelling unit that provides more than one bedroom.
D. Minimum Facilities. Accessory dwelling units developed within existing structures or living areas shall include permanent provisions for independent living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation within the unit and must include a separate exterior entrance from the primary dwelling unit if the primary dwelling is a single-family dwelling.
E. Appearance. The accessory dwelling unit shall be designed and constructed with the same architectural style, exterior materials and colors as the primary dwelling. The accessory dwelling unit shall be subordinate to the primary dwelling unit. Manufactured
homes shall meet the architectural standards set forth in Section 19.10.030(E) (Residential zone general development standards).
F. Parking Requirements. Accessory dwelling units developed within existing structures or living areas shall not be required to provide parking. A garage, carport, or covered parking structure shall be subject to the development regulations of Section 19.22.030 (Accessory structures), if the owner chooses to provide parking as part of the accessory dwelling unit.
In addition, when a garage, carport, covered parking structure, or uncovered parking space is converted to an accessory dwelling unit, the required off street parking spaces for the primary dwelling unit, if eliminated, do not need to be replaced. If the property owner chooses to replace the parking spaces, the replacement spaces may be located in any configuration on the same lot as the accessory dwelling unit, including within the front yard or street side setback, and may be covered spaces subject to conformance with the applicable requirements set forth in Section 19.22.030(C)(2) (Permitted accessory structures to dwelling use type (single-family and two-family)) or Section 19.22.030(0 )(3) (Permitted accessory structures to dwelling use type (multi-family)), uncovered spaces or tandem spaces. All replacement parking shall comply with the requirements set forth in Section 11.20.110 (Parking on private property prohibited), Section 19.10.030(F) (Residential zone general development standards), and Section 19.26.040(A) (Design and improvement of parking).
G. Passageways. No passageways shall be required in conjunction with accessory dwelling units developed within existing structures or living areas.
H. Building and Fire Codes. Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, accessory dwelling units developed within existing structures or living areas shall comply with all local building and fire codes. A demolition permit for a detached garage that is to be replaced with an accessory dwelling unit must be reviewed with the application of the accessory dwelling unit and issued at the same time.
I. Fire Sprinklers. Accessory dwelling units developed within existing structures or living areas shall not be required to provide fire sprinklers if fire sprinklers were not required for the primary dwelling unit.
J. Utilities. Accessory dwelling units developed within existing structures or living areas shall not be required to install a new or separate utility connection directly between the accessory dwelling unit and the public utility infrastructure, unless the accessory dwelling unit was constructed with a new single-family dwelling unit. However, if necessary utility infrastructure does not exist with capacity available to serve both the primary dwelling unit and the accessory dwelling unit, the property owner shall be responsible for all costs related to installation of necessary infrastructure or upsizing existing infrastructure. Property owners may install a new or separate utility connection directly between the accessory dwelling unit and the public utility infrastructure at the property owner's option and expense.
K. Height. An accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed the height limits prescribed in Section
19.10.030 (Residential zone general development standards) for the zone in which the accessory dwelling unit will be located, or if not within a residential zone, the height shall not exceed the standards established in Section 19.10.030 for the single-family residential (R1) zone.
L. Number Permitted. Except as otherwise permitted by subsection M, only one accessory dwelling unit is permitted per lot.
M. Exceptions to Development Standards.
1. One accessory dwelling unit and one junior accessory dwelling unit is permitted per lot with a proposed or existing single-family dwelling if all of the following apply:
a. The accessory dwelling unit or junior accessory dwelling unit is within the proposed space of a single-family dwelling unit or existing space of a single-family dwelling unit or accessory structure and may include an expansion of not more than 150 square feet beyond the same physical dimensions as the existing accessory structure. An expansion beyond the physical dimensions of the existing accessory structure shall be limited to accommodating ingress andegress. b. The space has exterior access from the proposed or existing single-family dwelling unit.
c. The side and rear setbacks are sufficient for fire and safety. d. The junior accessory dwelling unit complies with the requirements of Government Code
Section 66313, as it now exists or may hereafter be amended.
2. Multiple accessory dwelling units within portions of existing multi-family dwelling units are permitted in areas not used as livable spaces, including, but not limited to, storage rooms, boiler rooms, passageways, attics, basements, or garages, if all of the following apply:
a. Each unit complies with state building codes for dwellings. b. At least one accessory dwelling unit is permitted within an existing multi-family dwelling or up to 25 percent of the existing multi-family dwelling units may be converted to accessory dwelling units, whichever is greater.
3. Two detached accessory dwelling units are permitted per lot that has an existing multifamily dwelling unit, subject to four-foot rear and side setbacks and the following height standards:
a. A height of 16 feet for a detached accessory dwelling unit on a lot with an existing or proposed single-family or multi-family dwelling unit. b. A height of 18 feet for a detached accessory dwelling unit on a lot with an existing or proposed single-family or multi-family dwelling unit that is within one-half mile of a major transit stop or a high-quality transit corridor, as those terms are defined in Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code, as may be amended from time to time. An additional two feet in height is also permitted when the height is to accommodate a roof pitch on the accessory dwelling unit that is aligned with the roof pitch of the primary dwelling unit.
c. A height of 18 feet for a detached accessory dwelling unit on a lot with an existing or proposed multi-family, multi-story dwelling.
d. A height of 25 feet or the height limitation in this Code that applies to the primary dwelling, whichever is lower, for an accessory dwelling unit that is attached to a primary dwelling. This clause shall not require City to allow an accessory dwelling unit to exceed two stories.
4. No public physical improvements shall be required for the creation or conversion of an accessory dwelling unit, including, but not limited to, sidewalk, street, or access
improvements. The addition of an accessory dwelling unit shall not require the correction of nonconforming zoning conditions, per Government Code Sections 66314 through 66315, as it now exists or may hereafter be amended.
N. Waivers. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this title, limits on height, setbacks, lot coverage, floor area ratio, open space, front setbacks, and lot sizes are hereby waived if they do not permit at least an 800-square-foot accessory dwelling unit which provides four-foot rear and side setbacks and meets the following height standards:
1. A height of 16 feet for a detached accessory dwelling unit on a lot with an existing or proposed single-family or multi-family dwelling unit.
2. A height of 18 feet for a detached accessory dwelling unit on a lot with an existing or proposed single-family or multi-family dwelling unit that is within one-half mile of a major transit stop or a high-quality transit corridor, as those terms are defined in Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code, as may be amended from time to time. An additional two feet in height is also permitted when the height is to accommodate a roof pitch on the accessory dwelling unit that is aligned with the roof pitch of the primary dwelling unit.
3. A height of 18 feet for a detached accessory dwelling unit on a lot with an existing or proposed multi-family, multi-story dwelling.
4. A height of 25 feet or the height limitation in this Code that applies to the primary dwelling, whichever is lower, for an accessory dwelling unit that is attached to a primary dwelling. This clause shall not require City to allow an accessory dwelling unit to exceed two stories. § 19.60.070. Development standards for accessory dwelling units proposed as new construction.
Newly constructed accessory dwelling units are permitted to be attached to a proposed or existing primary dwelling unit or detached from a proposed or existing primary dwelling unit as long as the newly constructed accessory dwelling unit is located on the same lot as a proposed or existing primary dwelling unit. Newly constructed accessory dwelling units shall be allowed only in compliance with the following standards:
A. Minimum Lot Area. There is no minimum lot area.
B. Maximum Lot Coverage. There is no maximum lot coverage.
C. Setbacks. No setback shall be required for an accessory dwelling unit constructed in the same location (i.e., footprint) and to the same dimensions as an existing accessory structure. A setback of four feet from the side and rear lot lines shall be required for an accessory dwelling unit that is otherwise newly constructed, including porches, decks, balconies, stairs, and patios which are attached to and for the use of the accessory dwelling unit.
D. Floor Area. The total floor area of an attached accessory dwelling unit shall not be less than 150 square feet nor exceed the standards of subsection E (Unit Sizes). The total floor area for a detached accessory dwelling unit shall not be less than 150 square feet nor exceed the standards of subsection E (Unit Sizes).
E. Unit Sizes.
1. An accessory dwelling unit shall not be less than the minimum size for an efficiency unit, as defined in Section 17958.1 of the Health and Safety Code, as may be amended from time to time.
2. An accessory dwelling unit shall not be more than 850 square feet for a studio or onebedroom or more than 1,000 square feet for an accessory dwelling unit that provides more than one bedroom.
F. Minimum Facilities. The accessory dwelling unit shall include permanent provisions for independent living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation within the unit and must include a separate exterior entrance from the primary dwelling unit if the primary dwelling is a singlefamily dwelling.
G. Appearance. The accessory dwelling unit shall be designed and constructed with the same architectural style, exterior materials and colors as the primary dwelling. The accessory dwelling unit shall be subordinate to the primary dwelling unit. Manufactured homes shall meet the architectural standards set forth in Section 19.10.030(E) (Residential zone general development standards).
H. Parking Requirements. Except as otherwise provided by this chapter, the parking required by this section is in addition to that required for the primary dwelling unit located on the lot by Chapter
19.26 (Off-Street Parking and Loading). Garages, carports, and covered parking structures attached to the accessory dwelling unit and built to satisfy the required parking standards for the accessory dwelling unit are subject to the same setbacks and other development regulations as the accessory dwelling unit.
1. Accessory dwelling units with one or more bedrooms shall provide at least one off-street parking space. Studios shall not be required to provide any parking spaces. The parking requirement for accessory dwelling units with bedrooms can be met by providing the required parking space within the front yard setback and may be located in tandem with other on-site parking as long as it complies with the requirements set forth in Section
11.20.110 (Parking on private property prohibited), Section 19.10.030(F) (Residential zone general development standards), and Section 19.26.040(A) (Design and improvement of parking).
2. When a garage, carport, covered parking structure, or uncovered parking space is demolished in conjunction with the construction of an accessory dwelling unit, the required off-street parking spaces for the primary dwelling unit, if eliminated, do not need to be replaced. If the property owner chooses to replace these parking spaces, the replacement spaces may be located in any configuration on the same lot as the accessory dwelling unit, including within the front yard or street side setback, and may be covered spaces subject to conformance with the applicable requirements set forth in Section 19.22.030(C)(2) (Permitted accessory structures to dwelling use type (single-family and two-family}) or Section 19.22.030(0 )(3) (Permitted accessory structures to dwelling use type (multifamily)), uncovered spaces or tandem spaces. All replacement parking shall comply with the requirements set forth in Section 11.20.110 (Parking on private property prohibited), Section 19.10.030(F) (Residential zone general development standards), and Section
19.26.040(A) (Design and improvement of parking).
3. Notwithstanding the above, accessory dwelling units shall not be required to provide parking in any of the following circumstances:
a. When the accessory dwelling unit is located within one-half mile walking distance of public transit.
b. When the accessory dwelling unit is located within the Old Town Historic District (DT-4) or the Central Business District (DT-6).
c. When the accessory dwelling unit is part of an existing or proposed primary dwelling
unit or an existing accessory structure.
d. When on-street parking permits are required but not offered to the occupant of the accessory dwelling unit.
e. When there is a car share vehicle located within one block of the accessory dwelling unit.
f. When a permit application for an accessory dwelling unit is submitted with a permit application to create a new single-family or multi-family dwelling.
I. Passageways. No passageways shall be required in conjunction with the construction of an accessory dwelling unit.
J. Building and Fire Codes. Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, newly constructed accessory dwelling units shall comply with all local building and fire codes.
K. Fire Sprinklers. Accessory dwelling units shall not be required to provide fire sprinklers if fire sprinklers were not required for the primary dwelling unit.
L. Utilities. New or separate utility connections directly between the accessory dwelling unit and the public utility infrastructure shall only be required if directed by the environmental utilities department or the electric department. In such cases, if necessary utility infrastructure does not exist with capacity available to serve both the primary dwelling unit and the accessory dwelling unit, the property owner shall be responsible for all costs related to installation of necessary infrastructure or upsizing existing infrastructure.
M. Height. An accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed the height limits prescribed in Section
19.10.030 (Residential zone general development standards) for the zone in which the accessory dwelling unit will be located, or if not within a residential zone, the height shall not exceed the standards established in Section 19.10.030 for the single-family residential (R1) zone.
N. Number Permitted. Except as otherwise permitted by subsection 0, only one accessory dwelling unit is permitted per lot.
0 . Exceptions to Development Standards.
1. One newly constructed detached accessory dwelling unit that does not exceed four-foot rear and side setbacks, which may be combined with one junior accessory dwelling unit, is permitted per lot if all of the following apply:
a. The total floor area for the newly constructed detached accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed 800 square feet.
b. The newly constructed detached accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed the following height standards:
i. A height of 16 feet for a detached accessory dwelling unit on a lot with an existing or proposed single-family or multi-family dwelling unit. ii. A height of 18 feet for a detached accessory dwelling unit on a lot with an existing or proposed single-family or multi-family dwelling unit that is within one-half mile of a major transit stop or a high-quality transit corridor, as those terms are defined in Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code, as may be amended from time to time. An additional two feet in height is also permitted when the height is to accommodate a roof pitch on the accessory dwelling unit that is aligned with the roof pitch of the primary dwelling unit.
iii. A height of 18 feet for a detached accessory dwelling unit on a lot with an existing or proposed multi-family, multi-story dwelling.
iv. A height of 25 feet or the height limitation in this Code that applies to the primary dwelling, whichever is lower, for an accessory dwelling unit that is attached to a primary dwelling. This clause shall not require City to allow an accessory dwelling unit to exceed two stories.
2. Multiple constructed detached accessory dwelling units are permitted per lot that has an existing multifamily dwelling unit. The number of accessory dwelling units shall not exceed the number of existing units on the lot and not more than eight detached accessory dwelling units are permitted. Accessory dwelling units are subject to the following development standards:
a. A four-foot rear and side setbacks.
b. A height of 16 feet for a detached accessory dwelling unit on a lot with an existing or proposed single-family or multi-family dwelling unit.
c. A height of 18 feet for a detached accessory dwelling unit on a lot with an existing or proposed single-family or multi-family dwelling unit that is within one-half mile of a major transit stop or a high-quality transit corridor, as those terms are defined in Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code, as may be amended from time to time.
An additional two feet in height is also permitted when the height is to accommodate a roof pitch on the accessory dwelling unit that is aligned with the roof pitch of the primary dwelling unit.
d. A height of 18 feet for a detached accessory dwelling unit on a lot with an existing or proposed multi-family, multi-story dwelling.
e. A height of 25 feet or the height limitation in this Code that applies to the primary dwelling, whichever is lower, for an accessory dwelling unit that is attached to a primary dwelling. This clause shall not require City to allow an accessory dwelling unit to exceed two stories.
3. No public physical improvements shall be required for the creation or conversion of an accessory dwelling unit, including, but not limited to, sidewalk, street, or access improvements. The addition of an accessory dwelling unit shall not require the correction of nonconforming zoning conditions, per Government Code Sections 66314 through 66315, as may be amended from time to time.
4. On a lot with a proposed multifamily dwelling, not more than two detached accessory dwelling units are permitted.
P. Waivers. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this title, limits on height, setbacks, lot coverage, floor area ratio, open space, front setbacks, and lot sizes are hereby waived if they do not permit at least an 800 square foot accessory dwelling unit which provides four-foot rear and side setbacks and meets the following height standards:
1. A height of 16 feet for a detached accessory dwelling unit on a lot with an existing or proposed single-family or multi-family dwelling unit.
2. A height of 18 feet for a detached accessory dwelling unit on a lot with an existing or proposed single-family or multi-family dwelling unit that is within one-half mile of a major transit stop or a high-quality transit corridor, as those terms are defined in Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code, as may be amended from time to time. An additional two feet in height is also permitted when the height is to accommodate a roof pitch on the accessory dwelling unit that is aligned with the roof pitch of the primary dwelling unit.
3. A height of 18 feet for a detached accessory dwelling unit on a lot with an existing or
proposed multi-family, multi-story dwelling.
4. A height of 25 feet or the height limitation in this Code that applies to the primary dwelling, whichever is lower, for an accessory dwelling unit that is attached to a primary dwelling. This clause shall not require City to allow an accessory dwelling unit to exceed two stories.
Title 19. Zoning
Article V. Administration and Procedures Chapter 19.70
Chapter 19.76. APPLICATION PROCESSING PROCEDURES
§ 19.76.050. Application acceptance and initial review.
The department shall review all applications for compliance with the submittal requirements. In order to be accepted for processing, an application shall include the required application, filing fees, and plans as defined in Chapter 19.76. Applications submitted without the required information are not required to be accepted for processing.
The applicant for any permit that is subject to the approval of the Design Committee, Planning Commission, or the City Council shall erect a public notification sign or signs on the project site as required by this section. The sign(s) shall be erected within 60 days after the submission of an application. An application shall not be deemed complete by City staff unless the required sign(s) have been erected. The sign(s) shall comply with the following criteria:
A. Any project requesting a General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan Amendment, and/or Rezone shall provide signage that is four feet tall by eight feet wide, mounted on four-inch by four-inch posts. All other projects shall provide signage no smaller than two feet by three feet and no larger than four feet tall by eight feet wide;
B. Sign(s) shall be erected adjacent to each public right-of-way street frontage that the project site abuts in a manner that does not create clear vision obstructions within the right-of-way; C. The sign shall include the wording “City of Roseville Planning Division” and “Development Proposal Pending” and shall include the following: applicant contact phone number(s), City of Roseville Planning Division phone number, applicant website information (if any), a list of the entitlements requested, and a brief description of the project; D. The applicant shall be responsible for constructing the sign(s), and for maintaining the sign(s) in a satisfactory condition, and shall remove all sign(s) within 30 days of a final determination by the appropriate City hearing body.
(Ord. 5428 § 1, 2014)
Title 19. Zoning
Article V. Administration and Procedures Chapter 19.70
Chapter 19.76. APPLICATION PROCESSING PROCEDURES
§ 19.76.210. Extension.
The period within which effectuation of a permit must occur may be extended by the Planning Manager’s approval of an Extension (EXT). An application for such an extension shall be filed pursuant to this chapter.
The Planning Manager may grant an extension for a permit which has been approved but has not been effectuated. The approval of an extension extends the expiration date for a minimum of one year from the original permit date except for major permits. The permit as extended, may be conditioned to comply with any development standards which may have been enacted since the permit was initially approved. The extension shall be granted if the findings specified in Section 19.78.060(D) are made. Any extension may require a public hearing at the discretion of the Planning Manager. (Ord. 5428 § 1, 2014; Ord. 6198 § 1, 2020; Ord. 6538 § 21, 2022)
Title 19. Zoning
Article V. Administration and Procedures Chapter 19.70
Chapter 19.82. MAJOR PROJECTS PERMIT PROCESSING
§ 19.82.030. Procedure.
A. Review Process. All projects subject to this section shall be processed and reviewed in three stages, as described below:
1. General. The required development plans for a major project shall consist of three types of plans, approved in three stages: Stage 1—Preliminary Development Plan; Stage 2— Architectural and Landscaping Plan; and Stage 3—Final Development Plans. The approved preliminary development plan shall be the basis and establish the conditions by which Stage 2—Architecture and Landscaping and Stage 3—Improvement Plans shall be applied.
2. Stage 1—While entitled “preliminary” this only refers to the level of detail of application materials required for Stage 1 processing. The preliminary development plan review shall [establish approved] configuration of buildings, parking, landscaping and open space locations, rough grading and drainage on- and off-site, vehicular and pedestrian circulation and development phasing. Stage 1 approval shall be comprehensive and shall be detailed enough to complete all required environmental review. All Stage 2 and 3 submittals and approvals shall substantially conform to the Stage 1 approval. Approval of final development plans shall be required prior to issuance of grading or building permits, unless specifically conditioned to permit earlier issuance in conjunction with preliminary development plan approval. Stage 1 review shall be performed by the Planning Commission.
3. Stage 2—Architecture and landscaping plan review shall include any conditions of approval or changes stipulated as part of the preliminary development plan approval.
The architecture and landscaping plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission.
4. Stage 3—Final plans shall include all site development, architecture and landscaping, and shall incorporate all of the conditions and changes stipulated in the preliminary development plan and architecture and landscaping plan review. Review and approval of the final plans shall be by the Planning Division.
B. Stage 1—Preliminary Development Plan.
1. Application. An application for a Stage 1—Preliminary development plan shall be made on the form provided by the Planning Division, accompanied by the fee established by the City Council, and shall contain all of the information listed below. Such information shall be submitted in a form as specified by the Planning Manager. a. Existing and proposed general topographical grades in sufficient detail to provide an overall grading and drainage plan;
b. Location of, and an arborist report for, all native oak trees on site and immediately adjacent to the project site, and a tree mitigation plan pursuant to the tree preservation requirements contained in Chapter 19.66;
c.Location of significant natural features and resources, including wetlands, intermittent and perennial streams and copies of any resource mitigation plans or permits;
d. Location, estimated floor area and intended use of all proposed buildings, structures and other improvements, including maximum heights; e. An on-site pedestrian and vehicular circulation and parking plan, including a table of parking spaces to be provided for projected uses/tenants, loading areas, transit facilities, and any off-site traffic control devices or improvements necessary for public safety, and points of ingress and egress to the development;
f. A traffic impact analysis as required by the Manager of Public Works/City Engineer;
g. Location of proposed open space and landscaped areas, including a general “palette” of plant and landscape materials;
h. Softline perspectives that convey the basic architectural intent/theme of the improvements. Such drawings shall not be required to include final details; i. A preliminary study of facilities and services required such as drainage, water, sewer, and public utilities;
j. Location of existing and proposed public services and facilities, and easements; k.A plan, including any operational programs, to ensure compatibility between proposed development and adjacent land uses;
l. If within an adopted specific plan area, a narrative statement indicating how the proposed major project conforms with the applicable plan and applicable design and landscape guidelines;
m. A tentative construction, phasing and completion schedule, including completion of Stage 2 and Stage 3 application submittals; and n. Any information deemed necessary by the Planning Manager in order to complete an environmental review and as deemed necessary to complete Stage 1 review.
2. Planning Commission Review.
a. The preliminary development plan shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission, at a duly noticed public hearing. In addition to all other required findings, the following findings must be made before approval can be granted. i. The preliminary development plan is consistent with the General Plan, applicable specific plan, and adopted City design guidelines; and ii. The design and installation of the preliminary development plan shall not be detrimental to the public health and safety, or be materially detrimental to the public welfare.
b. In approving a preliminary development plan, the Planning Commission may place conditions on the project to assure that the design and installation of the project shall be consistent with the public health, safety and welfare; and may add conditions or standards applicable to Stage 3—Final Plans to assure that the project is reviewed and developed in an orderly manner. The Planning
Commission shall not take formal action or condition building architecture or landscaping materials, but may make recommendations related to these for consideration in Phase II review.
3. Notice of Action. Within two working days of the action by the Planning Commission, a notice of the decision shall be mailed to the applicant at the address appearing on the application, or to such other address designated in writing by the applicant, and to each City Council member and the City Manager. The notice shall contain the following information:
a. Findings upon which the decision was based;
b. The type of environmental document prepared and date ratified; c.The action of the Planning Commission;
d. Conditions of approval;
e. A preliminary development plan expiration date and extension requirements; f. Notice of the appeal period and a brief description of procedure to file an appeal; g. Notice of need to pursue administrative remedies; and h. For City Council notices only, a copy of the preliminary development plan.
4. Appeal of Planning Commission Decision. The Planning Commission decision on a preliminary development plan may be appealed in writing to the City Council within 10 calendar days of the decision, as provided in Chapter 19.80.
5. Preliminary Development Plan Expiration. An approved preliminary development plan shall expire two years from the date of the Planning Commission’s action, unless building permits have been issued, substantial site work has commenced and substantial liabilities have been incurred in good faith reliance on the permits. The approval may be extended for up to two additional years. Alternatively, the Planning Commission may as a condition of approval specify a longer period of time prior to the expiration of a preliminary development plan.
A request to extend the approval shall be made on an application form provided by the Planning Manager, and shall be accompanied with a written narrative explaining the reasons for the extension and with a fee as established by the City Council. The application shall be submitted prior to the expiration of the preliminary development plan and once the application is submitted to the Planning Division, the plan shall be automatically extended for another 60 days.
The Planning Manager may approve, conditionally approve, or deny a request to extend approval of a Major Project Permit if the preliminary development plan is in compliance with all applicable City requirements in effect at the time such extension is considered by the Planning Manager.
ORDINANCE NO. 6955
ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AMENDING CHAPTER
18.05 REGARDING TENTATIVE MAP APPLICATIONS - MINISTERIAL THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. The section of the Roseville Municipal Code listed above is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment “A”.
SECTION 2. This ordinance shall be effective at the expiration of thirty (30) days from the date of adoption.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause this ordinance to be published in full at least once within fourteen (14) days after it is adopted in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, or shall within fourteen (14) days after its adoption cause this ordinance to be posted in full in at least three (3) public places in the City and enter in the Ordinance Book a certificate stating the time and place of said publication by posting.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
ATTACHMENT "A"
Title 18. Subdivisions
Chapter 18.05. TENTATIVE MAP APPLICATIONSMINISTERIAL
§ 18.05.010 . Tentative map required.
A tentative map shall be required wherever a final map or parcel map is required by the Subdivision Map Act, unless specifically waived by the provisions of this title or the Subdivision Map Act. (Ord. 2747 § 1, 1993; Ord. 6477 § 4, 2022; Ord. 6828, 6/19/2024) § 18.05.020. Application required.
Whenever a tentative map is required, the subdivider shall submit to the director a complete tentative map application to be processed in accordance with the provisions of this chapter and title.
An application shall be processed pursuant to Chapter 18.06 unless consistent with one of the following:
A. Ministerial Affordable Housing Map. It is a parcel map associated with a residential multi-unit (three or more units) or mixed-use housing project that provides a minimum of 20 percent of the units as affordable units for low, very low or extremely low income households and where the applicant agrees to enter into an affordable housing agreement prior to recordation of the parcel map (hereinafter affordable housing project),
B. Ministerial Two-Lot Single-Family Map. The application meets the following qualifying criteria for a ministerial two-lot parcel map:
1. The parcel is located within a single-family residential zone, which are the city's singlefamily residential (R1) and small lot residential (RS) zones.
2. The parcel map subdivides an existing parcel to create no more than two new parcels of approximately equal lot area provided that one parcel shall not be smaller than 40 percent of the lot area of the original parcel proposed for subdivision.
3. Both newly-created parcels are a minimum of 1,200 square feet.
4. The parcel being subdivided has not been established through prior exercise of a parcel map pursuant to this section, nor has the owner or any person acting in concert with the owner previously subdivided an adjacent parcel pursuant to this section.
5. The proposed parcel map would not require demolition or alteration of any of the following types of housing:
a. Housing subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low income. b. Housing which has been occupied by a tenant anytime within the last three years.
c. Housing subject to any form of rent or price control through a public entity's valid exercise of its police power.
d. A parcel or parcels on which an owner of residential real property has exercised the owner's rights under Government Code Chapter 12.75 (commencing with Section 7060) of Division 7 of Title 1, as may be amended from time to time, to withdraw accommodations from rent or lease within 15 years before the date that the development proponent submits an application.
6. The parcel is not located within a historic district or property included on the State Historic Resources Inventory, as defined in Section 5020.1 of the Public Resources Code, as may be amended from time to time, or within a site that is designated or listed as a city or county landmark or historic property or district pursuant to a city or county ordinance.
7. The parcel is not located on a site that is or contains any of the following, pursuant to Government Code subparagraphs (B) to (K), as may be amended from time to time, inclusive, of paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of Section 65913.4, as may be amended from time to time:
a. Either prime farmland or farmland of statewide importance, as defined pursuant to United States Department of Agriculture land inventory and monitoring criteria, as modified for California, and designated on the maps prepared by the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the Department of Conservation, or land zoned or designated for agricultural protection or preservation by a local ballot measure that was approved by the voters of that jurisdiction.
b. Wetlands, as defined in the United States Fish and Wildlife Service Manual, Part 660 FW 2 (June 21, 1993).
c. Within a very high fire hazard severity zone, as determined by the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection pursuant to Government Code Section 51178, as may be amended from time to time, or within a high or very high fire hazard severity zone as indicated on maps adopted by the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection pursuant to Section 4202 of the Public Resources Code, as may be amended from time to time. This subparagraph does not apply to sites excluded from the specified hazard zones by a local agency, pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 51179 of the Government Code, as may be amended from time to time, or sites that have adopted fire hazard mitigation measures pursuant to existing building standards or state fire mitigation measures applicable to the development.
d. A hazardous waste site that is listed pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5, as may be amended from time to time, or a hazardous waste site designated by the Department of Toxic Substances Control pursuant to Section 25356 of the Health and Safety Code, as may be amended from time to time, unless the State Department of Public Health, State Water Resources Control Board, or Department of Toxic Substances Control has cleared the site for residential use or residential mixed uses. e. Within a delineated earthquake fault zone as determined by the State Geologist in any official maps published by the State Geologist, unless the development complies with applicable seismic protection building code standards adopted by the California Building Standards Commission under the California Building Standards Law (Part 2.5 (commencing with Section 18901) of Division 13 of the Health and Safety Code, as may be amended from time to time), and by any local building department under Government Code Chapter 12.2 (commencing with Section 8875) of Division 1 of Title 2, as may be amended from time to time.
f. Within a special flood hazard area subject to inundation by the one percent annual chance flood (100-year flood) as determined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency in any official maps published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. If a development proponent is able to satisfy all applicable federal qualifying criteria in order to provide that the site satisfies this subparagraph and is otherwise eligible for streamlined approval under this section, a local government shall not deny the application on the basis that the development proponent did not comply with any additional permit requirement, standard, or action adopted by that local government that is applicable to that site. A development may be located on a site described in this subparagraph if either of the following are met:
i. The site has been subject to a Letter of Map Revision prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency and issued to the local jurisdiction. ii. The site meets Federal Emergency Management Agency requirements necessary to meet minimum flood plain management criteria of the National Flood Insurance Program pursuant to Part 59 (commencing with Section 59.1) and Part 60 (commencing with Section 60.1) of Subchapter B of Chapter I of Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as may be amended from time to time. g. Within a regulatory floodway as determined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency in any official maps published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, unless the development has received a no-rise certification in accordance with Section 60.3(d)(3) of Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as may be amended from time to time. If a development proponent is able to satisfy all applicable federal qualifying criteria in order to provide that the site satisfies this subparagraph and is otherwise eligible for streamlined approval under this section, a local government shall not deny the application on the basis that the development proponent did not comply with any additional permit requirement, standard, or action adopted by that local government that is applicable to that site. h. Lands identified for conservation in an adopted natural community conservation plan pursuant to the Natural Community Conservation Planning Act (Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 2800) of Division 3 of the Fish and Game Code, as may be amended from time to time), habitat conservation plan pursuant to the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. Section 1531 et seq., as may be amended from time to time), or other adopted natural resource protection plan. i. Habitat for protected species identified as candidate, sensitive, or species of special status by state or federal agencies, fully protected species, or species protected by the Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. Section 1531 et seq., as may be amended from time to time), the California Endangered Species Act (Chapter 1.5 (commencing with Section 2050) of Division 3 of the Fish and Game Code, as may be amended from time to time), or the Native Plant Protection Act (Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 1900) of Division 2 of the Fish and Game Code, as may be amended from time to time.
j. Lands under conservation easement.
C. Ministerial Multifamily Map. The application is for a ministerial map of 10 or fewer parcels resulting in 10 or fewer residential units and meets all of the following qualifying criteria:
1. The parcel is one of the following:
a. The parcel is a legal lot located within the city's multi-family residential (R3) zone and meets the following criteria:
i. The parcel is no greater than five acres.
ii. The proposed parcels are no smaller than 600 square feet. b. The parcel is a vacant legal lot, as defined by Government Code Section 66499.41(a)(2)(A)(ii), as may be amended from time to time, located within the City’s single-family residential (R1/RS) zone and meets the following criteria:
i. The parcel is no greater than 1.5 acres
ii. The proposed parcels are no smaller than 1,200 square feet.
2. The parcel being subdivided has not been established through prior exercise of a map pursuant to Chapter 18.05.
3. The parcel is substantially surrounded by urban uses. As defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 21159.25 of the Public Resources Code, as may be amended from time to time, substantially surrounded means at least 75 percent of the perimeter of the project site adjoins or is separated only by an improved public right-of-way from any residential, commercial, public institutional, transit or transportation passenger facility, or retail use, or any combination of those uses. The remaining 25 percent of the perimeter of the project must adjoin or be separated only by an improved public right-of-way from parcels that have been designated for any residential, commercial, public institutional, transit or transportation passenger facility, or retail use, or any combination of those uses, by the Zoning Ordinance, a specific plan/community plan, or the General Plan.
4. The project shall result in at least 66 percent of the maximum allowable units as projected for that parcel in the General Plan Housing Element and shall also provide at least as many low or very low income units identified in the General Plan Housing Element for the parcel (subject to a recorded affordability restriction of at least 45 years). If the parcel is not identified in the General Plan Housing Element, the project shall result in at least 66 percent of the maximum allowable residential density.
5. The average total area of floorspace for the proposed housing units on the lot proposed to be subdivided does not exceed 1,750 net habitable square feet. Habitable space is defined by the California Building Code, as may be amended from time to time, as a space in a building for living, sleeping, eating, or cooking (bathrooms, toilet rooms, closets, halls, storage, or utility spaces and similar areas are not included in net habitable space).
6. Any parcels proposed to be created pursuant to this section will be served by a public water system and a municipal sewer system.
7. The proposed project would not require demolition or alteration of any of the following types of housing:
a. Housing subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low income. b. Housing which has been occupied by a tenant anytime within the last five years. c. Housing subject to any form of rent or price control through a public entity's valid exercise of its police power.
d. A parcel or parcels on which an owner of residential real property has exercised the owner's rights under Government Code Chapter 12.75 (commencing with Section 7060) of Division 7 of Title 1, as may be amended from time to time, to
withdraw accommodations from rent or lease within 15 years before the date that the development proponent submits an application.
8. The parcel is not located on a site that is or contains any of the following, pursuant to Government Code subparagraphs (B) to (K), inclusive, of paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of Section 65913.4, as may be amended from time to time:
a. Either prime farmland or farmland of statewide importance, as defined pursuant to United States Department of Agriculture land inventory and monitoring criteria, as modified for California, and designated on the maps prepared by the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the Department of Conservation, or land zoned or designated for agricultural protection or preservation by a local ballot measure that was approved by the voters of that jurisdiction. b. Wetlands, as defined in the United States Fish and Wildlife Service Manual, Part 660 FW 2 (June 21, 1993).
c. Within a very high fire hazard severity zone, as determined by the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection pursuant to Government Code Section 51178, as may be amended from time to time, or within a high or very high fire hazard severity zone as indicated on maps adopted by the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection pursuant to Section 4202 of the Public Resources Code, as may be amended from time to time. This subparagraph does not apply to sites excluded from the specified hazard zones by a local agency, pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 51179 of the Government Code, as may be amended from time to time, or sites that have adopted fire hazard mitigation measures pursuant to existing building standards or state fire mitigation measures applicable to the development. d. A hazardous waste site that is listed pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 or a hazardous waste site designated by the Department of Toxic Substances Control pursuant to Section 25356 of the Health and Safety Code, as may be amended from time to time, unless:
i. The site is an underground storage tank site that received a uniform closure letter issued pursuant to subdivision (g) of Section 25296.10 of the Health and Safety Code, as may be amended from time to time, based on closure criteria established by the State Water Resources Control Board for residential use or residential mixed uses.
ii. The State Department of Public Health, State Water Resources Control Board, Department of Toxic Substances Control, or a local agency making a determination pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 25296.10 of the Health and Safety Code, as may be amended from time to time, has otherwise determined that the site is suitable for residential use or residential mixed uses.
e. Within a delineated earthquake fault zone as determined by the State Geologist in any official maps published by the State Geologist, unless the development complies with applicable seismic protection building code standards adopted by the California Building Standards Commission under the California Building Standards Law (Part 2.5 (commencing with Section 18901) of Division 13 of the Health and Safety Code, as may be amended from time to time), and by any local building department under Government Code Chapter 12.2 (commencing with Section 8875) of Division 1 of Title 2, as may be amended from time to time.
f. Within a special flood hazard area subject to inundation by the one percent annual chance flood (100-year flood) as determined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency in any official maps published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. If a development proponent is able to satisfy all applicable federal qualifying criteria in order to provide that the site satisfies this subparagraph and is otherwise eligible for streamlined approval under this section, a local government shall not deny the application on the basis that the development proponent did not comply with any additional permit requirement, standard, or action adopted by that local government that is applicable to that site.
A development may be located on a site described in this subparagraph if either of the following are met:
i. The site has been subject to a Letter of Map Revision prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency and issued to the local jurisdiction. ii. The site meets Federal Emergency Management Agency requirements necessary to meet minimum flood plain management criteria of the National Flood Insurance Program pursuant to Part 59 (commencing with Section 59.1) and Part 60 (commencing with Section 60.1) of Subchapter B of Chapter I of Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as may be amended from time to time.
g. Within a regulatory floodway as determined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency in any official maps published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, unless the development has received a no-rise certification in accordance with Section 60.3(d)(3) of Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as may be amended from time to time. If a development proponent is able to satisfy all applicable federal qualifying criteria in order to provide that the site satisfies this subparagraph and is otherwise eligible for streamlined approval under this section, a local government shall not deny the application on the basis that the development proponent did not comply with any additional permit requirement, standard, or action adopted by that local government that is applicable to that site.
h. Lands identified for conservation in an adopted natural community conservation plan pursuant to the Natural Community Conservation Planning Act (Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 2800) of Division 3 of the Fish and Game Code, as may be amended from time to time), habitat conservation plan pursuant to the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. Section 1531 et seq., as may be amended from time to time), or other adopted natural resource protection plan. i. Habitat for protected species identified as candidate, sensitive, or species of special status by state or federal agencies, fully protected species, or species protected by the Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. Section 1531 et seq., as may be amended from time to time), the California Endangered Species Act (Chapter 1.5 (commencing with Section 2050) of Division 3 of the Fish and Game Code, as may be amended from time to time), or the Native Plant Protection Act (Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 1900) of Division 2 of the Fish and Game Code, as may be amended from time to time). j. Lands under conservation easement.
9. The housing units on the lot proposed to be subdivided are to be constructed on fee simple ownership lots, as part of a common interest development, as part of a housing
cooperative, or are to be owned by a community land trust, consistent with Government Code 66499.41(a) (4), as may be amended from time to time.
10. The proposed subdivision conforms to all applicable objective requirements of the Subdivision Map Act (Division 2 (commencing with Section 66410, as may be amended from time to time)), except as otherwise expressly provided in this section, and the project conforms to Government Code Section 65852.28, as may be amended from time to time.
11. The proposed subdivision will not result in any existing dwelling unit being alienable separate from the title to any other existing dwelling unit on the lot.
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 6/18/2025
Item #: VII.43
File #: 0102-03
Item ID: 2025-373
Title: Minutes of Prior Meetings
Contact: Melissa Lipp 9167745268 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of the minutes of the May 21, 2025 City Council Closed Session Meeting, the May 21, 2025 City Council and Housing Successor Meeting, and the May 28, 2025 City Council Budget Workshop.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the minutes of the May 21, 2025 City Council Closed Session Meeting, the May 21, 2025 City Council and Housing Successor Meeting, and the May 28, 2025 City Council Budget Workshop.
BACKGROUND
Not applicable.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this request.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The City Council minutes are not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Melissa Lipp, City Clerk Technician
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
ATTACHMENTS:
1. May 21 2025 City Council Closed Session Minutes
2. May 21, 2025 City Council Minutes
3. May 28, 2025 City Council Budget Workshop Minutes
REVIEWERS:
Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Created/Initiated - 6/5/2025
Melissa Lipp, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 6/5/2025
Krista Bernasconi, Mayor
Karen Alvord, Vice Mayor
Bruce Houdesheldt, Councilmember
Tracy Mendonsa, Councilmember
Pauline Roccucci, Councilmember
Dominick Casey, City Manager
Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
AGENDA
City Council Closed Session Meeting
May 21, 2025
5:30 PM
City Council Chambers, 311 Vernon Street
1. CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Bernasconi called the meeting to order at 5:34 p.m.
2. CLOSED SESSION ROLL CALL
Present: Vice Mayor Alvord, Councilmember Houdesheldt, Councilmember Mendonsa, Councilmember Roccucci, Mayor Bernasconi
3. CLOSED SESSION PUBLIC COMMENTS
No public comment received.
4. CLOSED SESSION (CITY ATTORNEY DEPARTMENT)
Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)
David Montano v. Todd Martin Braden, City of Roseville
Sacramento County Superior Court, Case Number 23CV012178 CONTACT: Michelle Sheidenberger 916-774-5325 [email protected] Closed Session Disclosure: No reportable action taken.
5. CLOSED SESSION ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Krista Bernasconi adjourned the meeting at 5:56 p.m.
Krista Bernasconi, Mayor
Karen Alvord, Vice Mayor
Bruce Houdesheldt, Councilmember
Tracy Mendonsa, Councilmember
Pauline Roccucci, Councilmember
Dominick Casey, City Manager
Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
MINUTES
City Council
Housing Successor Meeting
May 21, 2025
6:00 PM
City Council Chambers, 311 Vernon Street
I. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Bernasconi called the meeting to order at 6:02 PM.
II. ROLL CALL
Present: Vice Mayor Alvord, Councilmember Houdesheldt, Councilmember Mendonsa, Councilmember Roccucci, Mayor Bernasconi.
III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Larry Winter led the Pledge of Allegiance.
IV. MEETING PROCEDURES
City Clerk Carmen Avalos announced the procedures for addressing the City Council.
V. PRESENTATIONS
1. Resolution - Rana Ghadban (CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Commend Rana Ghadban for her outstanding service, leadership, and contributions to the betterment of the Roseville community and to the Roseville Area Chamber of Commerce; and extend best wishes for continued success in her future endeavors.
CONTACT: Blair Hutchison 916-774-5266 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
City Council made the presentation to former Roseville Area Chamber of Commerce CEO Rana Ghadban, who responded.
2. Resolution - Larry Winter (CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Commend Larry Winter for his 30 years of outstanding service and dedication to the City of Roseville and the Fire Department, congratulate him for his many accomplishments, and wish him a long, healthy, and enjoyable retirement.
CONTACT: Blair Hutchison 916-774-5266 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
City Council made the presentation to former Fire and Environmental Safety Inspector Larry Winter, who responded.
VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the first opportunity to make a public comment on non-agenda items.
Amelia Kelly - Spoke on mental health.
Brandon Bettencourt - Spoke on homelessness.
Jennifer Chapman - Spoke on tree permit and meeting with Public Works Director Jason Shykowski held at the Terraces of Roseville.
Evi Pineschi - Expressed appreciation for honoring her father, Aldo Pineschi.
VII. CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters on the Consent Calendar are considered routine in nature and are approved by one motion of the City Council. There will be NO discussion on consent calendar items unless an item is removed for further discussion.
Motion by Councilmember Houdesheldt; seconded by Councilmember Roccucci, to Approve the Consent Calendar as recommended. The motion Passed.
Votes:
Yes - Alvord, Houdesheldt, Mendonsa, Roccucci, Bernasconi
3. West Zone Reclaimed Water Tanks Rehabilitation Project (RFP# 08-140) – Notice of Completion (ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT - TECHNICAL SERVICES) Summary: Staff recommends acceptance of the Notice of Completion for the West Zone Reclaimed Water Tanks Rehabilitation Project with Euro Style Management. The total cost of the construction contract is $1,067,592.69. Funding for this project was provided by the Wastewater Rehabilitation Fund.
CONTACT: Inderpreet Chaggar 916-774-5553 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-141 accepting the Public Work known as the West Zone Reclaimed 2
Water Tanks Rehabilitation Project, approving the “Notice of Completion”, and authorizing the Environmental Utilities Director to execute said notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.
4. Water Well Maintenance and Rehabilitation Project - Professional Services Agreement Amendment and Budget Adjustment (ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT - TECHNICAL
SERVICES)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the first amendment to the professional services agreement with Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. for the Water Well Maintenance and Rehabilitation Project in the amount of $458,071.70. The amendment will increase the total notto-exceed amount from $607,915 to $1,065,986.70. This item also requests approval of a budget adjustment of $405,000 from the Water Rehabilitation Fund.
CONTACT: Keith Schmidt 916-746-1194 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-156 approving a first amendment to professional services agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville; and b. Adopt Ordinance No. 6944 authorizing certain amendments to the fiscal year 2024-25 budget and declaring this ordinance to be immediately effective as an appropriation measure.
5. Wastewater Collections Cured-in-Place Pipe Lining Equipment – Budget Adjustment (ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT - WASTEWATER)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a budget adjustment of $750,000 to augment the Sewer Collection System Cured-in-Place Pipe (CIPP) Rehabilitation Project from the Wastewater Rehabilitation Fund, and $1,200,000 from the project for a contribution to the Fleet Replacement Fund for the purchase of a new truck equipped with CIPP lining equipment and a cutting machine to be installed within an existing truck to allow Wastewater Collections to perform trenchless repair and rehabilitation work to existing sewer mains.
CONTACT: Tracie Mueller 916-774-5688 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Ordinance No. 6939 of the Council of the City of Roseville authorizing certain amendments to the fiscal year 2024-25 budget and declaring this ordinance to be immediately effective as an appropriation measure.
6. Sacramento Regional Water Bank Phase 3 – Regional Water Authority Program Agreement (ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT - WATER)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of an agreement with the Regional Water Authority and other water agency partners to allow the City to participate in Phase 3 of the development of the Sacramento Regional Groundwater Bank at a cost of $36,720, which includes a 20% 3
contingency and is budgeted in the Regional Water Supply Reliability Study project in the Water Construction Fund.
CONTACT: Janice Gainey 916-774-5535 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-154 approving a Regional Water Authority program agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and the Regional Water Authority, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
7. Electric Powered Compact Crawler Boom Lift and Trailer – Budget Adjustment (ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT - WASTEWATER)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a budget adjustment for $175,000 to fund the purchase of an electric-powered compact crawler boom lift and accompanying trailer to be used by the Environmental Utilities Maintenance Section and Wastewater Collection Section to address existing water and wastewater infrastructure inspection, repair and replacement work.
Funding is included in the Fleet Replacement Fund.
CONTACT: Adam Carpineta 916-746-1963 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Ordinance No. 6938 authorizing certain amendments to the fiscal year 2024-25 budget and declaring this ordinance to be immediately effective as an appropriation measure.
8. Data Management Strategy and Implementation Roadmap - Professional Services Agreement and Budget Adjustment (ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends approval of a professional services agreement with EMA of Minnesota, Inc. in the amount of $268,560 for a data management strategy and implementation roadmap. Staff also recommends approval of a budget adjustment in the amount of $118,560.
Funding is recommended from available resources in the Water, Wastewater, and Solid Waste Operations Fund budgets.
CONTACT: Rachel Tooker 916-746-1712 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-145 to approve a professional services agreement with EMA of Minnesota, Inc. in the amount of $268,560 for the Data Management Strategy and Implementation Roadmap Project and authorize the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City; and
b. Adopt Ordinance No. 6942 authorizing certain amendments to the fiscal year 2024-25 budget and declaring this ordinance to be immediately effective as an appropriation measure. 4
9. Transit System Operation and the South Placer County Transit Information Center - Agreement (PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - TRANSPORTATION)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of an agreement with MV Transportation, Inc. for the continued operation of the City's Transit system and the South Placer County Transit Information Center. If approved, the City’s maximum cumulative obligation for the first five years of the contract is limited to $36,231,945.84. Funding for this contract will be provided through a combination of Local Transportation Funds for the operation of Roseville Transit, and through the Consolidated Transportation Services Agency Fund for the operation of the Call Center. No General Fund resources will be used for this contract.
CONTACT: Ed Scofield 916-774-5449 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-155 approving an agreement for City of Roseville Transit System Management, Operations and Call Center Services, by and between the City of Roseville and MV Transportation, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
10. SB 125 Transit Funds - Program Funding and Reimbursement Agreement (PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT - TRANSPORTATION)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a Program Funding and Reimbursement Agreement with Placer County Transportation Planning Agency in the amount of $11,700,133 towards eligible City projects. In the event project costs exceed the SB 125 totals, Local Transportation Funds would likely be used. No General Fund resources will be used.
CONTACT: Ed Scofield 916-774-5449 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-146 approving Senate Bill 125 program funding and reimbursement agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
11. California Energy Commission's Distributed Electricity Backup Assets Grant Award - Budget Adjustment (ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT - FINANCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE) Summary: Staff recommends approval of a budget adjustment in the amount of $1,374,747 for the receipt of the California Energy Commission's Distributed Electricity Backup Assets grant award for the Roseville Peaking Plant Combustion Turbines Upgrade Project in the Electric Fund.
CONTACT: Matt Nelson 916-774-5618 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Ordinance No. 6941 authorizing certain amendments to the fiscal year 2024-25 budget and declaring this ordinance to be immediately effective as an appropriation measure. 5
12. Roseville Energy Park Sample Panel Upgrade - Sole Source Contract Purchase Agreement (ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a sole source contract purchase agreement with Sentry Equipment Corporation (Sentry) in the amount of $92,470 for installation services to upgrade the Sample Panel at the Roseville Energy Park and grant staff the authority to approve change orders up to 10% of the overall contract amount, or $9,247, for a total of $101,717. Since Sentry is the original equipment manufacturer and is providing the new Sample Panel, their services are required for its installation. Funding is included in the Electric Department's FY2024-25 budget in the Electric Fund.
CONTACT: Michael Zasso 916-746-1665 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-138 approving a contract purchase agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Sentry Equipment Corp, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
13. California-Oregon Transmission Project - Instrument of Assignment and Transfer (ELECTRIC
DEPARTMENT - RESOURCE PLANNING & GENERATION)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of City of Redding’s Instrument of Assignment and Transfer Agreement for the California-Oregon Transmission Project. There is no fiscal impact associated with the agreement.
CONTACT: Petra Wallace 916-774-5510 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-153 approving a form of Instrument of Assignment and transfer, by and between the City of Redding and the Transmission Agency of Northern California, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
14. Energy Risk Management Policies Update (ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT - FINANCIAL &
ADMINISTRATIVE)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of updates to the Energy Risk Management Policy, Energy Credit Risk Policy, Energy Trading Authority Policy, and the Energy Hedge Policy. There is no fiscal impact associated with these policy changes.
CONTACT: Glenn Hoffman 916-746-1670 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-149 approving updates to the Energy Risk Management Policy; and b. Adopt Resolution No. 25-150 approving updates to the Energy Credit Risk Policy; and c. Adopt Resolution No. 25-151 approving updates to the Energy Trading Authority Policy; and d. Adopt Resolution No. 25-152 approving updates to the Energy Hedge Policy. 6
15. Interactive Training Programs - Professional Services Agreement Amendment (HUMAN
RESOURCES DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a professional services agreement amendment with Human Side Consulting and a spending authority increase from $65,000 to $90,000 to provide additional training and consulting services. Funding is available in the Human Resources Department training budget in the General Fund.
CONTACT: Evelyn Bowers 916-774-5213 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-133 approving a third amendment to professional services agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Human Side Consulting, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
16. Legal Services Agreement (CITY ATTORNEY DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends approval of an agreement with Angelo, Kilday & Kilduff, LLP to provide legal services. Legal services provided by this contract will be dependent upon needs as they occur during the year and thus cannot be forecast. All expenses will be paid by the Human Resources Department budget, the City Attorney's operating budget in the General Fund, or by other departments and funds as appropriate.
CONTACT: Gretchen Hakala [email protected]
The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-131 approving an agreement for legal services, by and between the City of Roseville and Angelo, Kilday & Kilduff, LLP, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
17. Diamond Creek Community Facilities District No. 1 - Budget Adjustment (PARKS, RECREATION,
AND LIBRARIES DEPARTMENT - PARK DEVELOPMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a budget adjustment in the amount of $12,370 for the purchase of park amenities and signage at Hughes and Davis parks. Funding is available in the Diamond Creek Community Facilities District No. 1 Capital Fund, which contains bond refunding savings to be used for improvements in the district. There will be no General Fund impacts.
CONTACT: Tara Gee 916-774-5253 [email protected]
The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Ordinance No. 6933 authorizing certain amendments to the fiscal year 2024-25 budget and declaring this ordinance to be immediately effective as an appropriation measure.
18. On-Call Concrete Construction Services - Contract Purchase Agreement (PARKS, RECREATION,
AND LIBRARIES DEPARTMENT - PARK DEVELOPMENT)
7
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a contract purchase agreement with TCW Concrete, Inc. in the amount of $350,000 annually for a total contract amount of $1,050,000. The agreement includes a base term with two (2) optional one (1) year renewals. The funding for each year’s annual maintenance contract will be included in the Parks, Recreation and Libraries operating budget, community facilities district and landscape and lighting district operating budgets, and capital improvement project budgets.
CONTACT: Kelly Appier 916-938-0859 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution 25-139 approving a contract purchase agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and TCW Concrete, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
19. FD-50 Neighborhood Park - Master Plan Approval (PARKS, RECREATION, AND LIBRARIES
DEPARTMENT - PARK DEVELOPMENT)
Summary:
Staff recommends approval of the FD-50 Neighborhood Park Master Plan. Maintenance will be funded through the Sierra Vista Community Facilities District No. 2 (Public Services). There will be no General Fund impact.
CONTACT: Tara Gee 916-774-5253 [email protected]
The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Approve the FD-50 Neighborhood Park Master Plan.
20. JM-52 Neighborhood Park - Master Plan Approval (PARKS, RECREATION, AND LIBRARIES
DEPARTMENT - PARK DEVELOPMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the JM-52 Neighborhood Park Master Plan. Funding for this project has been included in the proposed FY2025-26 budget for design and is anticipated to be included in the FY2026-27 budget for construction through the Sierra Vista Neighborhood Park Fund. Maintenance will be funded through the Sierra Vista Community Facilities District No. 2 (Public Services). There will be no General Fund impact.
CONTACT: Tara Gee 916-774-5253 [email protected]
The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Approve the JM-52 Neighborhood Park Master Plan.
21. Woodbridge Park Tennis and Pickleball Court Improvements Project - Reject All Bids and Authorize Staff to Call for New Bids (PARKS, RECREATION, AND LIBRARIES DEPARTMENT - PARK
DEVELOPMENT)
8
Summary: Staff recommends approval to reject all bids for the Woodbridge Park Tennis and Pickleball Court Improvements Project and authorize staff to call for new bids. The project is estimated to cost $260,000 and will be funded by the Parks, Recreation, and Library Capital Projects Fund through the FY2024-25 budget process.
CONTACT: Josh Cervantes 916-746-1233 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-143 rejecting all bids for the Woodbridge Park Tennis and Pickleball Court improvements project; and
b. Authorize staff to call for new bids.
22. The Courts at Gibson Park Frontage Improvement Project - Approval of Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Call for Bids (PARKS, RECREATION, AND LIBRARIES
DEPARTMENT - PARK DEVELOPMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the plans and specifications for the Courts at Gibson Park Frontage Improvement Project and authorize staff to call for bids. The project estimate is $405,000, including all add alternates. Funding for this project was approved using the Citywide Park Fund through the FY2024-25 Capital Improvement project budget. Additional funds were allocated using the FY2023-24 General Fund year-end surplus for costs associated with the sidewalk along Roseville Parkway.
CONTACT: Josh Cervantes 916-746-1233 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Approve the plans and specifications for the Courts at Gibson Park Frontage Improvement Project and authorize staff to call for bids.
23. Buljan Middle School and Eich Middle School Portable Removal Project - Approval of a New Non-Capital Improvement Project and Budget Adjustment, and Buljan Middle School Student Union Roof Repairs - Project Cancellation (PARKS, RECREATION, AND LIBRARIES DEPARTMENT -
ADMINISTRATION)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a budget adjustment in the amount of $200,000 for the establishment of a new non-capital project, Buljan and Eich Portable Removal. Funding is provided by the Parks, Recreation and Library Capital Projects Fund. Staff also recommends approval of the cancellation of the Buljan Student Union Roof Repairs Project and return of the unspent budget of $50,000 to the Parks Recreation and Library Capital Projects Fund.
CONTACT: Rob Nakamura 916-774-5135 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Ordinance No. 3936 authorizing certain amendments to the fiscal year 2024-25 budget and declaring this ordinance to be immediately effective as an appropriation measure; and 9
b. Authorize the establishment of a new non-capital project, Buljan and Eich Portable Removal.
24. Rocky Rockholm Park Project - Award of Contract (PARKS, RECREATION, AND LIBRARIES
DEPARTMENT - PARK DEVELOPMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a contract with Hemington Landscape Services, Inc. in the amount of $506,514 for the Rocky Rockholm Park project which includes the base bid, add alternate and winter suspension. Funding for construction of this park was initially included in FY2023-24 Capital Improvement Project budget through the Neighborhood Park - Sierra Vista Fund. Maintenance costs will be funded by the Sierra Vista Community Facilities District (Public Services) Fund.
CONTACT: Joel De Jong 916-774-5924 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Award the Rocky Rockholm Park project to the lowest responsible bidder, Hemington Landscape Services, Inc.; and
b. Adopt Resolution No. 25-137 approving an agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Hemington Landscape Services, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
25. Downtown Library Security and Space Plan Project – New Non-Capital Multi-Year Project and Budget Adjustment (PARKS, RECREATION, AND LIBRARIES DEPARTMENT - PARK DEVELOPMENT) Summary: Staff recommends approval of a new non-capital multi-year project and approval of a budget adjustment in the amount of $148,469 to re-direct funds allocated for the Downtown Library Public Service Desk - Security Upgrades Project to the Downtown Library Security and Space Plan Project. Funding for the original front desk relocation project was approved in FY2023-24 through the Facilities Rehabilitation Fund.
CONTACT: Tara Gee 916-774-5253 [email protected]
The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Approve a new non-capital improvement project (Downtown Library Security and Space Plan project).
b. Adopt Ordinance No. 6934 authorizing certain amendments to the fiscal year 2024-25 budget and declaring this ordinance to be immediately effective as an appropriation measure.
26. Fire Department Strike Team Reimbursements - Budget Adjustment (FIRE DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends approval of a budget adjustment to recognize $1,207,276 in additional overtime expenses, $7,893 in other reimbursable items/logistics, $1,762,939 in revenue related to the department's participation in reimbursable strike teams, and a $547,770 10
positive impact contribution to the General Fund with available resources for fleet usage and overhead.
CONTACT: Matthew Lauchner 916-774-5807 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Ordinance No. 6935 authorizing certain amendments to the fiscal year 2024-25 budget and declaring this ordinance to be immediately effective as an appropriation measure.
27. Audit Services - Agreement Amendment (FINANCE DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends approval of a professional services agreement amendment with Lance, Soll & Lunghard, LLP, in the amount of $208,692 to provide audit services. Audit costs are partially paid for by the General Fund. The cost of the FY2025-26 audit services has been included in the proposed FY2025-26 budget.
CONTACT: Teri Quinlan 916-774-5316 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-134 approving a second amendment to agreement for audit services, by and between the City of Roseville and Lance, Soll & Lunghard, LLP and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
28. 60kV Overhead Conductors (RFQ 10-3412) - Purchase Order (FINANCE DEPARTMENT -
PURCHASING)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a purchase order with Southwire Company, LLC as the lowest responsive and responsible bidder for purchasing 60kV overhead conductors in response to RFQ 10-3412. Funding is included in the Electric Fund budget. The total spending authority for the initial contract period and optional renewal years through FY2029-30 is a not-to-exceed amount of $2,000,000.
CONTACT: Sue Jessup 916-746-1107 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution 25-135 approving a purchase order with Southwire Company, LLC, as the lowest responsive and responsible bidder for purchasing 60kV overhead conductors.
29. Annual Audit Reports for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2024 – Single Audit, Electric Fund, Other Post-Employment Benefit Trust Fund, and Roseville Natural Gas Financing Authority (FINANCE DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends Council receive four informational financial reports for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024, along with six required auditor communication letters. There is no impact to the City's General Fund.
CONTACT: Teri Quinlan 916-774-5316 [email protected] 11
The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. This is an informational item and requires no City Council action.
30. Maidu Community Center Roof Replacement Project (RFQ 10-3415) - Contract Purchase Agreement (FINANCE DEPARTMENT - PURCHASING)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a contract purchase agreement with MCM Roofing Company, Inc. in the amount of $262,483 to provide the materials and labor to repair and/or replace the designated roof areas at the Maidu Community Center. Additionally, authorize the City Manager or his designee to approve change order requests for this project up to 10% ($26,248.30) as a construction contingency, for a grand total of $288,731.30. Funding is included in the FY2024-25 Facility Rehabilitation Fund budget.
CONTACT: Tiffany Valdez 916-746-1109 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-144 approving a contract purchase agreement by and between the City of Roseville and MCM Roofing Co., Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
31. Community Facilities Districts - Budget Adjustment (FINANCE DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends approval of a budget adjustment amending the Community Facilities District (CFD) budgets, which includes bond proceeds received and disbursed, pay-asyou-go developer reimbursements as well as development agreement-obligated payments from certain special tax funds. There are sufficient fund balances in all the identified CFDs to accommodate the budget adjustments.
CONTACT: Jeannine Thrash 916-774-5473 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Ordinance No. 6937 authorizing certain amendments to the fiscal year 2024-25 budget and declaring this ordinance to be immediately effective as an appropriation measure.
32. Janitorial Supplies – Purchase Order (FINANCE DEPARTMENT - PURCHASING) Summary: Staff recommends approval of a purchase order with Waxie’s Enterprises, LLC dba Waxie Sanitary Supply for the purchase of janitorial supplies utilizing Omnia Partners Region 14 Education Service Center (ESC) – TX Contract #152610. The piggyback contract has an initial three-year term with two optional one-year renewals. The estimated total award for the initial contract through June 30, 2026, is $320,000. Funding is included in the FY2024-25 budgets for the Public Works Department’s Custodial Division and the Central Stores inventory.
CONTACT: Tiffany Valdez 916-746-1109 [email protected] 12
The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-136 approving a purchase order for janitorial supplies.
33. Pad Mount Transformers for Roseville RPEAK Facility (RFQ 10-3413) - Purchase Order (FINANCE DEPARTMENT - PURCHASING)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a purchase order with ULS Corporate, Inc. for the purchase of pad mount transformers for the Roseville RPEAK facility. The spending authority of this purchase order is $60,820.88. Funding is included in the Electric Fund budget for FY2024-25.
CONTACT: Sue Jessup 916-746-1107 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Approve a purchase order with ULS Corporate, Inc.
34. Outdoor Switchgear Motor Control Centers for Roseville RPEAK Facility (RFQ 10-3414) - Purchase Order (FINANCE DEPARTMENT - PURCHASING)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a purchase order with Siemens Industry, Inc. for the purchase of Outdoor Switchgear/Motor Control Centers for the Roseville RPEAK facility. The spending authority of this purchase order is $621,100.16, plus a 5% contingency for a total notto-exceed amount of $652,155.17. Funding is included in the FY2024-25 Electric Fund budget.
CONTACT: Sue Jessup 916-746-1107 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-148 approving a purchase order for outdoor switchgear motor control centers for Roseville RPEAK Facility.
35. Tax Revenue Consulting Services - Professional Services Agreement Amendment (FINANCE
DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a third amendment to the professional services agreement with HdL Companies for transient occupancy tax administration, short-term rental administration, business tax administration, and related consulting services. This amendment increases the annual not-to-exceed amount by $408,070, resulting in a total not-to-exceed amount of $1,308,070 over the five-year term. Adequate funding is available in the adopted FY2024-25 budget to support this agreement through the end of the fiscal year. Staff will include the remaining costs associated with the agreement in the proposed FY2025-26 budget.
CONTACT: Teri Quinlan 916-774-5316 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-140 approving the third amendment to the professional services 13
agreement for Tax Revenue Consulting Services with Hinderliter, de Llamas & Associates dba HdL Companies, and authorize the City Manager to execute it.
36. Building Plan Check and Inspection Services - On-Call Professional Services Agreement Amendment (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION) Summary: Staff recommends approval of the fourth amendment to the on-call professional services agreement with Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. for building plan review and inspection services and authorize an additional $150,000, resulting in a total contract value of $500,000 for FY2024-25. Staff also recommends authorization of an increase in the contract authority in FY2025-26, upon exercise of the annual renewal option by the City Manager, to $500,000. Funding is included in the Development Services budget and is fully recoverable through permit fee revenue.
CONTACT: Stacie Marchetti 916-774-5278 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-132 approving a fourth amendment to the on-call professional services agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Bureau Veritas North America, inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville; and b. Authorize an increase in the contract authority in FY2025-26 to $500,000, upon exercise of the annual renewal option by the City Manager effective July 2025.
37. Fire Station Alerting System Project (RFP 12-026) - Change Order Authority Increase (INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT - CLIENT & INNOVATION SERVICES) Summary: Staff recommends increasing change order authority by an additional 6% to Contract Purchase Agreement 3002829 with Honeywell International Inc. and Contract Purchase Agreement 3002630 with Electrical Construction Services dba Tech Electric, for the Fire Station Alerting System Project. The additional 6% change order authority will add $96,160.55, with $61,902.17 applied to Honeywell International Inc and $34,258.38 applied to Electrical Construction Services Inc dba Tech Electric contracts. Funding is included in the project budget in the Information Technology Replacement Fund for the increased contingency.
CONTACT: Melissa Patrick 916-774-5127 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-174 approving an increase in spending authority
38. California Opioid Settlement - Approval of New Non-Capital Project and Budget Adjustment (POLICE DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a budget adjustment in the amount of $272,300 in the Opioid Settlement Fund to fund eligible General Fund labor costs associated with opioid remediation activities performed by the Police Department’s Social Services Unit. Staff also recommends approval of a new Non-Capital Project (California Opioid Settlement - Police). The 14
City received funds from the California Opioid Settlements to be used for opioid remediation activities.
CONTACT: Mark Peinado 916-774-5021 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Approve the establishment of a new Non-Capital Project (California Opioid Settlement - Police); and
b. Adopt Ordinance No. 6940 authorizing certain amendments to the fiscal year 2024-25 budget and declaring this ordinance to be immediately effective as an appropriation measure.
39. Minutes of Prior Meetings (CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the minutes of the February 24, 2025 City Council Strategic Planning Workshop, February 25, 2025 City Council Strategic Planning Workshop, April 2, 2025 City Council and Housing Authority Meeting and the April 16, 2025 City Council Meeting.
CONTACT: Melissa Lipp 9167745268 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Approve the minutes of the February 24, 2025 City Council Strategic Planning Workshop, February 25, 2025 City Council Strategic Planning Workshop, April 2, 2025 City Council and Housing Authority Meeting and the April 16, 2025 City Council Meeting.
40. Resolution - Rena Spohr (CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Commend Rena Spohr for her 30 years of outstanding service and dedication to the City of Roseville and the Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department, congratulate her for her many accomplishments and wish her a long, healthy, and enjoyable retirement.
CONTACT: Blair Hutchison 916-774-5266 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
41. Proclamation - National Police Memorial Day May 15, 2025 (CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT) Summary: Proclaim May 15, 2025, as National Police Memorial Day and publicly salute the service of Roseville law enforcement officers and officers in communities across the nation.
CONTACT: Blair Hutchison 916-774-5266 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
42. Proclamation - Public Works Week May 18–24, 2025 (CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT) Summary: Proclaim May 18–24, 2025, as National Public Works Week and urge all residents to pay tribute to public works professionals, engineers, managers, and employees and to recognize 15
the substantial contributions they make to protecting our national health, safety, and advancing the quality of life for all.
CONTACT: Blair Hutchison 916-774-5266 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
43. Proclamation - Small Business Month May 2025 (CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT) Summary: Proclaim May 2025 as National Small Business Month and encourage support of this national effort, so Roseville's small businesses can do what they do best – grow their businesses, create jobs, and ensure that our communities remain as vibrant tomorrow as they are today.
CONTACT: Blair Hutchison 916-774-5266 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
VIII. PRESENTATIONS/REPORTS
44. Council Discretionary Funds - Sober Grad Night (CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT - CITY
MANAGER)
Summary: Staff recommends Council consider providing sponsorship to four local high schools in the form of a discretionary fund donation for the Safe and Sober Grad Night events for this year's graduating seniors. The City Council has funded prior years' requests for Safe and Sober Grad night activities at $500 per school. The balance remaining in the Council Discretionary Funds for FY2024-25 is $9,821.
CONTACT: Heather Blanco 916-746-1171 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Approve Council Discretionary Fund for the Safe and Sober Grad Night events for Roseville, Woodcreek, West Park, and Oakmont High Schools in the amount of _________.
Amy Patterson, on behalf of Roseville High School, spoke in support of the item.
Leah Prior, Booster President for Oakmont High School, spoke in support of the item.
Motion by Councilmember Mendonsa; seconded by Councilmember Roccucci, to Approve Council Discretionary Funds for the Safe and Sober Grad Night events for Roseville, Woodcreek, West Park, and Oakmont High Schools in the amount of $500 to each school. The motion Passed.
Votes:
Yes - Alvord, Houdesheldt, Mendonsa, Roccucci, Bernasconi
45. Roseville Designation of Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map (FIRE DEPARTMENT) 16
Summary: Staff recommends approval of designating moderate, high and very high fire hazard severity zones within the City as required by California Government Code section 51179. Since 1982 Cal Fire has been mandated to create Fire Hazard Severity Zone maps statewide. The state only identified those areas in the State Responsibility Area until 1992 when Assembly Bill 337 (Bates 1992) called for CalFire to begin implementing fire hazard severity maps into Local Responsibility Areas. Subsequent legislation has increased the state's responsibility to implement moderate, high and very high fire hazard severity zones statewide and mandated that all local areas adopt these maps by ordinance.
CONTACT: Michael Bradley 916-774-5400 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Introduce for first reading Ordinance designating moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones within the City of Roseville.
Fire Chief Ryan Harrigan made the presentation to the City Council.
Jennifer Chapman spoke in support of the map.
Motion by Councilmember Houdesheldt; seconded by Councilmember Mendonsa, to Introduce for first reading Ordinance designating moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones within the City of Roseville. The motion Passed.
Votes:
Yes - Alvord, Houdesheldt, Mendonsa, Roccucci, Bernasconi
46. Grants Advisory Commission FY2025-26 Funding Recommendations (PUBLIC AFFAIRS AND
COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the Grants Advisory Commission’s funding recommendations to award 17 grant applications, allocating $284,710 from the Citizens' Benefit Fund and $3,300 from the Roseville Employees Annual Charitable Hearts Fund. Funding is included in the proposed FY2025-26 budget.
CONTACT: Tobi Thomas 916-746-1368 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Approve the Grants Advisory Commission's recommendations to fund seventeen (17) grant applications in the amount of $284,710 from the Citizens' Benefit Fund and $3,300 from the Roseville Employees Annual Charitable Hearts Fund.
Management Analyst Tobi Thomas made the presentation to the City Council.
No public comment received.
Vice Mayor Alvord declared a conflict of interest as her spouse is the Roseville Police Athletic League 17
Board President.
Mayor Bernasconi declared a conflict of interest as she is a board member of the Roseville Police Athletic League.
Councilmember Roccucci declared a conflict of interest as she is an alternate member of the Roseville Police Athletics League.
Without a quorum to vote on the matter, Councilmember Roccucci's name was randomly drawn to fulfill the quorum.
Mayor Bernasconi and Vice Mayor Alvord recused themselves and left the dais.
Motion by Councilmember Mendonsa; seconded by Councilmember Roccucci, to Approve the Grants Advisory Commission Recommendation to fund the Roseville Police Assistance League (RPAL) from the Citizen's Benefit Fund in the amount of $13,306. The motion Passed.
Votes:
Yes - Houdesheldt, Mendonsa, Roccucci
Absent - Alvord, Bernasconi
Vice Mayor Alvord returned to the dais.
The record will reflect that Mayor Bernasconi will not participate on the discussion or vote for Lighthouse Counseling and Family Resource Center and Stand Up Placer.
Motion by Councilmember Houdesheldt; seconded by Councilmember Roccucci, to Approve the Grants Advisory Commission Recommendation to fund the Lighthouse Counseling and Family Resource Center in the amount of $30,000 from the Citizen Benefit Fund. The motion Passed.
Votes:
Yes - Houdesheldt, Mendonsa, Roccucci
Absent - Alvord, Bernasconi
Motion by Vice Mayor Alvord; seconded by Councilmember Mendonsa, to Approve the Grants Advisory Commission Recommendation to fund the Stand Up Placer in the amount of $20,500 from the Citizen Benefit Fund. The motion Passed.
Votes:
Yes - Alvord, Houdesheldt, Mendonsa, Roccucci
Absent - Bernasconi
Mayor Bernasconi returned to the dais.
Motion by Vice Mayor Alvord; seconded by Councilmember Mendonsa, to Approve the Grants Advisory Commission Recommendation to fund the remaining 14 of the 17 grant applications in the amount of $220,204 from the Citizen's Benefit Fund and $3,300 from the Roseville Employees Annual Charitable Hearts Fund. The motion passed.
18
Votes:
Yes - Alvord, Houdesheldt, Mendonsa, Roccucci, Bernasconi
47. HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY/CITY COUNCIL - Fiscal Year 2025-26 Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing - Funding Recommendations (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT -
HOUSING)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of funding recommendations for the 2025-26 Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing Program. Funding allocations utilize Housing Successor Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund and State of California Permanent Local Housing Allocation funding.
CONTACT: Suzanne Acrell 916-774-5469 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-147 approving funding recommendations and authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute grant agreements on behalf of the City of Roseville.
Housing Manager Trisha Isom introduced Housing Analyst Suzanne Acrell, who made the presentation to the City Council.
Chief Strategy Officer David Loya spoke in support of the item.
Brian spoke in support of the work the City does for homelessness.
Pursuant to the Levine Act, Vice Mayor Alvord recused herself from voting on the item as she received a campaign contribution exceeding $250 from the Chief Executive Officer in 2024.
Vice Mayor Alvord left the dais.
Motion by Councilmember Roccucci; seconded by Councilmember Mendonsa, to Approve funding recommendation in the amount of $125,000 for The Gathering Inn. The motion Passed.
Votes:
Yes - Houdesheldt, Mendonsa, Roccucci, Bernasconi
Absent - Alvord
Vice Mayor Alvord returned to the dias.
Motion by Coucilmember Houdesheldt; seconded by Councilmember Mendonsa, to Adopt Resolution 25-147 approving funding recommendations for the remaining organizations and authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute all grant agreements on behalf of the City of Roseville. The motion Passed.
19
Votes:
Yes - Alvord, Houdesheldt, Mendonsa, Roccucci, Bernasconi
48. Capital Improvement Program Proposed Budget Preview for Fiscal Year 2025-26 (PUBLIC
WORKS DEPARTMENT - ADMINISTRATION DIVISION )
Summary: Staff will give a presentation on the Capital Improvement Program proposed budget preview for Fiscal Year 2025-26.
CONTACT: Lainie Anderson 916-774-5440 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. This is an informational item and requires no City Council action.
Staff made the presentation to the City Council.
Brian requested clarification on what Folsom reliability referred to.
This is an informational item and requires no City Council action.
49. FY2024-25 Second Quarter Financial Report (FINANCE DEPARTMENT - BUDGET) Summary: The FY2024-25 Second Quarter Report provides a summary of the City's financial position through the second quarter for (1) the General Fund, (2) the enterprise funds, and (3) revenues in other selected funds. This report is provided pursuant to the Budget Control section of the City Charter (Section 7.15).
CONTACT: Nancy Rothlisberger 916-774-5314 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. This is an informational item and requires no City Council action.
Finance Director Scott Pettingell made the presentation to the City Council.
No public comment received.
For information only. No action required.
IX. PUBLIC HEARINGS
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC: Public Hearing Process
City Council, when considering the matter, will take the following actions:
1. Open the Public Hearing
2. Presentation by staff
3. Presentation by applicant or appellant
4. Accept public testimony
5. Appellant or applicant rebuttal period
20
6. Close the Public Hearing
7. City Council comments and questions
8. City Council action
Any challenges in court about public hearing matters noticed on this agenda may be limited to only those issues, that were raised orally at the public hearing or in written form received by the City on or before the hearing.
Public Hearings listed for continuance will be continued and posting of this agenda will serve as notice of continuation.
50. Fiscal Year 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District Assessments - Amending and/or Approving the Engineer's Annual Levy Report, Ordering the Levy and Collection of Assessments (FINANCE DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the engineer's annual levy reports for Fiscal Year 2025- 26 and ordering the levy and collection of assessments within the described Landscaping and Lighting Districts (individually "LLD" and collectively "LLDs"). These LLDs were formed within the City to levy and collect assessments for maintenance of public improvements pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, Sections 22500, et seq., and Article XIII D of the California Constitution. All charges are needed to fund landscape services in each LLD. There is no fiscal impact on the General Fund.
CONTACT: Jeannine Thrash 916-774-5473 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-157 amending and/or Approving the Engineer's Annual Levy Report for the Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District, Fiscal Year 2025/2026; and b. Adopt Resolution. No. 25-158 ordering the Levy and Collection of Assessments within the Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District, for Fiscal Year 2025/2026; and c. Adopt Resolution No. 25-159 amending and/or Approving the Engineer's Annual Levy Report for the Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District, Fiscal Year 2025/2026; and d. Adopt Resolution No. 25-160 ordering the Levy and Collection of Assessments within the Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District, for Fiscal Year 2025/2026; and e. Adopt Resolution No. 25-161 amending and/or Approving the Engineer's Annual Levy Report for the Johnson Ranch Landscaping and Lighting District, Fiscal Year 2025/2026; and f. Adopt Resolution No. 25-162 ordering the Levy and Collection of Assessments within the Johnson Ranch Landscaping and Lighting District, for Fiscal Year 2025/2026; and g. Adopt Resolution No. 25-163 amending and/or Approving the Engineer's Annual Levy Report for the North Central Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District, Fiscal Year 2025/2026; and
21
h. Adopt Resolution No. 25-164 ordering the Levy and Collection of Assessments within the North Central Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District, for Fiscal Year 2025/2026; and
i. Adopt Resolution No. 25-165 amending and/or Approving the Engineer's Annual Levy Report for the Northwest Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District, Fiscal Year 2025/2026; and
j. Adopt Resolution No. 25-166 ordering the Levy and Collection of Assessments within the Northwest Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District, for Fiscal Year 2025/2026; and
k. Adopt Resolution No. 25-167 amending and/or Approving the Engineer's Annual Levy Report for the Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District, Fiscal Year 2025/2026; and l. Adopt Resolution No. 25-168 ordering the Levy and Collection of Assessments within the Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District, for Fiscal Year 2025/2026; and m. Adopt Resolution No. 25-169 amending and/or Approving the Engineer's Annual Levy Report for the Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District, Fiscal Year 2025/2026; and n. Adopt Resolution No. 25-170 ordering the Levy and Collection of Assessments within the Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District, for Fiscal Year 2025/2026; and o. Adopt Resolution No. 25-171 amending and/or Approving the Engineer's Annual Levy Report for the Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District, Fiscal Year 2025/2026; and p. Adopt Resolution No. 25-172 ordering the Levy and Collection of Assessments within the Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District, for Fiscal Year 2025/2026; and Mayor Bernasconi opened the public hearing at 7:46 p.m.
Finance Director Scott Pettingell made the presentation to the City Council.
No public comment was received.
Mayor Bernasconi closed the public hearing at 7:48 p.m.
Motion by Councilmember Houdesheldt; seconded by Councilmember Mendonsa, to adopt Resolution No. 25-157 amending and/or approving the Engineer's Annual Levy Report for the Historic District Landscaping and Lighting Distric, Fiscal Year 2025/26; and adopt Resolution No. 25-158 ordering the Levy and Collection of Assessments within the Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District, for Fiscal Year 2025/26; and adopt Resolution No. 25-159 amending and/or approving the Engineer's Annual Levy Report for the Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District, Fiscal Year 2025/26; and adopt Resolution No. 25-160 ordering the Levy and Collection of Assessments within the Infill Area 22
Landscaping and Lighting District, Fiscal Year 2025/26; and adopt Resolution No. 25-161 amending and/or approving the Engineer's Annual Levy Report fo the Johnson Ranch Landscaping and Lighting District, Fiscal Year 2025/26; and adopt Resolution No. 25-162 ordering the Levy and Collection of Assessments within the Johnson Ranch Landscaping and Lighting District, for Fiscal Year 2025/26; and adopt Resolution No. 25-163 amending and/or approving the Engineer's Annual Levy Report for the North Central Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District, Fiscal Year 2025/26; and adopt Resolution No. 25-164 ordering the Levy and Collection of Assessments within the North Central Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District, for Fiscal Year 2025/26; and adopt Resolution No. 25-165 amending and/or approving the Engineer's Annual Levy Report for the Northwest Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District, Fiscal Year 2025/26; and adopt Resolution No. 25-166 ordering the Levy and Collection of Assessments within the Northwest Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District, for Fiscal Year 2025/26; and adopt Resolution No. 25-167 amending and/or approving the Engineer's Annual Levy Report for the Olympus Point Landscaping and Lighting District, Fiscal Year 2025/26; and adopt Resolution No. 25-168 ordering the Levy and Collection of Assessments within the Olympus Point Landscaping and Lighting District, for Fiscal Year 2025/26; and adopt Resolution No. 25-169 amending and/or approving the Engineer's Annual Levy Report for the Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District, Fiscal Year 2025/26; and adopt Resolution No. 25- 170 ordering the Levy and Collection of Assessments within the Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District, for Fiscal Year 2025/26; and adopt Resolution No. 25-171 amending and/or approving the Engineer's Annual Levy Report for the Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District, Fiscal Year 2025/26; and adopt Resolution No. 25-164 ordering the Levy and Collection of Assessments within the Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District, for Fiscal Year 2025/26. The motion Passed.
Votes:
Yes - Alvord, Houdesheldt, Mendonsa, Roccucci, Bernasconi
51. Water, Wastewater, and Waste Services - Proposed Utility Rate Adjustments and Municipal Code Revisions for Fiscal Year 2025-26 and Fiscal Year 2026-27 (ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends the City Council conduct a public hearing to receive public comment regarding proposed rate adjustments effective July 4, 2025, and July 1, 2026, for water, wastewater, and waste services utility rates and associated amendments to the Roseville Municipal Code. The proposed rate adjustments will result in additional combined revenue over the next two years of approximately $5.3 million to the water utility, $5.3 million to the wastewater utility, and $3.8 million to the waste services utility. The increased revenue is necessary to maintain current levels of service for Environmental Utilities.
CONTACT: Shane Whittington 916-774-5557 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Conduct a public hearing and receive public comment and respond to questions regarding the proposed adjustments to water, wastewater, and waste services utility rates; and b. Introduce for first reading an ordinance amending Roseville Municipal Code sections pertaining to water (14.08.090, 14.08.100), wastewater (14.16.200, 14.17.080) and waste 23
services (9.12.030, 9.12.070, 9.12.090 and 9.12.130) to implement the rate adjustments and add modifications for clarity and consistency.
Mayor Bernasconi opened the public hearing at 7:52 p.m.
Staff made the presentation to the City Council.
No public comment was received.
Mayor Bernasconi closed the public hearing at 8:02 p.m.
Motion by Councilmember Houdesheldt; seconded by Councilmember Mendonsa, to Introduce for first reading an ordinance amending Roseville Municipal Code sections pertaining to water (14.08.090,
14.08.10), wastewater (14.16.200, 14.17.080) and waste services (19.12.030, 9.12.070, 9.12.090 and
9.12.130) to implement the rate adjustments and add modifications for clarity and consistency. The motion Passed.
Votes:
Yes - Alvord, Houdesheldt, Mendonsa, Roccucci, Bernasconi
52. Community Development Block Grant - 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan, 2025 Annual Action Plan, Analysis of Impediments and Citizen Participation Plan (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT - HOUSING)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the City's 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan, 2025 Annual Action Plan, Update to the Analysis of Impediments and Citizen Participation Plan for the federal Community Development Block Grant Program and authorization for the City Manager to execute necessary documents and certifications on behalf of the City. This item does not result in any impact to the City's General Fund.
CONTACT: Kristine Faelz 916-774-5451 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Conduct a Public Hearing and receive public comment on the City of Roseville 2025–29 Consolidated Plan, the 2025 Annual Action Plan, and the proposed updates to the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI) and Citizen Participation Plan (CPP); and b. Adopt Resolution No. 25-142 approving the 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan, Approving the 2025 Annual Action Plan, Approving the proposed amendments to the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice and Citizen Participation Plan, and Authorizing the City Manager to execute necessary documents and certifications on behalf of the City of Roseville for submittal to the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD).
Mayor Bernasconi opened the public hearing at 8:04 p.m.
Housing Manager Trisha Isom introduced Housing Analyst Kristine Faelz, and made the presentation to the City Council.
24
No public comment was received.
Mayor Bernasconi closed the public hearing at 8:11 p.m.
Mayor Bernasconi declared a conflict of interest as the organization has been a client, and left the dais.
Motion by Councilmember Houdesheldt; seconded by Vice Mayor Alvord, to Approve the grant amount of $18,750 for Stand Up Placer for the application to be submitted to HUD. The motion Passed.
Votes:
Yes - Alvord, Houdesheldt, Mendonsa, Roccucci
Absent - Bernasconi
Mayor Bernasconi returned to the dais.
Motion by Councilmember Mendonsa; seconded by Councilmember Roccucci, to Conduct a Public Hearing and receive public comment on the City of Roseville 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan, the 2025 Annual Action Plan, and the proposed updates to the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice(AI) and Citizen Participation Plan(CPP); and adopt Resolution No. 25-142 approving the 2025- 2029 Consolidated Plan, approving the 2025 Annual Action Plan, approving the proposed amendments to the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice and Citizen Participation Plan, and authorizing the City Manager to execute necessary documents and certifications on behalf of the City of Roseville for submittal to the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development(HUD). The motion Passed.
Votes:
Yes - Alvord, Houdesheldt, Mendonsa, Roccucci, Bernasconi X. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the second opportunity to make a public comment on non-agenda items.
No public comment received
XI. STAFF/COUNCIL REPORTS
Coucilmember Roccucci reported on various community events.
Highway 65 Joint Powers Authority Meeting - Councilmember Mendonsa reported on attendance.
Cap-to-Cap Meeting - Councilmember Mendonsa reported on attendance.
Councilmember Mendonsa reported on various community events.
Vice Mayor Alvord reported on various community events. 25
Councilmember Houdesheldt reported on various community events.
Mayor Bernasconi reported on various community events.
XII. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Bernasconi adjourned the meeting at 8:29 p.m. in honor of Aldo Pineschi. 26
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 6/18/2025
Item #: VIII.44
File #: 0103 & 0103-07-03
& 0103-08-03 & 0103-09-03
& & 0103-34-03 & 0103-44-
03 Item ID: 2025-371
Title: Board and Commissions Bi-Annual Vacancies
Contact: Katrina Six 916-774-5267 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends Council appoint Michael Rohey to the Design Committee to a term expiring June 30, 2029; appoint three (3) individuals to the Economic Development Advisory Committee to terms expiring June 30, 2029 from the applications received from: Blandon Granger, Elizabeth Guerrero, Jeff Richardson, Barbara Sady, Ravi Sharma, Lilia Tahmasian, and Michael Tronnes; and appoint two (2) individuals to the Grants Advisory Commission to terms expiring June 30, 2029 from the applications received from Nick Busse, Venu Mallesara, Michael Murray, Barbara Sady, and Mark Stewart; and appoint Stephanie Hill and John Speight to the Local Sales Tax Citizens' Oversight Committee to terms expiring June 30, 2029; and appoint two (2) individuals to the Planning Commission to terms expiring June 30, 2029 from the applications received from Clifford Haggenjos, Bruce Hagler, Michael Murray, and Ravi Sharma; and appoint Edward Bielski, Richard DeMarchi, and Gus Petraborg to the Public Utilities Commission to terms expiring June 30, 2029.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:
a. Appoint Michael Rohey to the Design Committee to a term expiring June 30, 2029; b. Appoint three (3) individuals to the Economic Development Advisory Committee to terms expiring June 30, 2029 from the applications received from: Blandon Granger, Elizabeth Guerrero, Jeff Richardson, Barbara Sady, Ravi Sharma, Lilia Tahmasian, and Michael Tronnes; c. Appoint two (2) individuals to the Grants Advisory Commission to terms expiring June 30, 2029 from the applications received from Nick Busse, Venu Mallesara, Michael Murray, Barbara Sady, and Mark Stewart;
d. Appoint Stephanie Hill and John Speight to the Local Sales Tax Citizens' Oversight Committee to terms expiring June 30, 2029;
e. Appoint two (2) individuals to the Planning Commission to terms expiring June 30, 2029 from the applications received from Clifford Haggenjos, Bruce Hagler, Michael Murray, and Ravi Sharma; and f. Appoint Edward Bielski, Richard DeMarchi, and Gus Petraborg to the Public Utilities Commission to terms expiring June 30, 2029.
BACKGROUND
Appointments are due to be made as part of the bi-annual recruitment process. Recruitment for all vacancies occurred in May and June. Video interviews of the applicants were conducted by the City Clerk Department, and the City Attorney’s Office reviewed the Statements of Economic Interest (Form 700) for potential conflicts of interest. The applications, video interviews, and confidential attorney review are compiled and provided to the City Council for consideration. The Design Committee received one application and the Public Utilities Commission received three applications and, as such, Michael Rohey, Edward Bielski, Richard DeMarchi, Gus Petraborg will be appointed to the positions.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The appointment of members to boards or commissions meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA.
No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
5. Support community engagement and advocacy
Respectfully Submitted,
Katrina Six, City Clerk Technician
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
ATTACHMENTS:
REVIEWERS:
Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Created/Initiated - 6/5/2025 Helen Dreyer, City Clerk Department Approved - 6/5/2025 Carmen Avalos, City Clerk Department Approved - 6/5/2025 Gretchen Hakala, City Attorney Department Approved - 6/6/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 6/6/2025
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/6/2025 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/6/2025 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 6/6/2025 Dominick Casey, City Clerk Department Approved - 6/8/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 6/8/2025
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 6/18/2025
Item #: VIII.45
File #: 0201 & 0103-03-02
& 0103-29-02
Item ID: 2025-326
Title: City of Roseville Fiscal Year 2025-26 Citywide Budget, Position Allocation Schedule, Roseville Housing Authority Budget, and Roseville Finance Authority Budget Contact: Nancy Rothlisberger 916-774-5314 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of the proposed Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26 citywide budget and position allocation schedule as incorporated into the budget document, effective July 1, 2025. The proposed citywide expenditure budget for FY2025-26 totals $827.2 million from all funding sources. The expenditure budget for the General Fund is $248.5 million, which includes operating ($235.6 million) and non-operating expenditures ($12.9 million). The FY2025-26 Housing Authority program expenditure budget is $12.0 million and is primarily comprised of funding from the federally-funded Housing Choice Voucher Program for the purpose of providing rental assistance to up to 846 families, seniors, disabled persons, and veterans annually. The FY2025-26 Roseville Finance Authority Budget includes debt service payments of $1.9 million reflecting scheduled payments on the Certificates of Participation for the Corporation Yard and 316 Vernon Street. Transfers out of the capital projects fund of $689,507 represent $636,107 to be transferred to the Citywide Parks Fund for the repayment of a loan from the Fleet Replacement Fund, which partially funded the construction of Harry Crabb Park, and $53,400 to be transferred to four community facilities districts and applied as levy credits. Capital outlay is budgeted at $67,990 for the Crabb Park Improvements Project, which includes a horseshoe court conversion and parking lot upgrades.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1) Adopt an ordinance approving the proposed City of Roseville FY2025-26 citywide budget and the position allocation schedule as incorporated into the budget document, effective July 1, 2025; 2) Adopt a resolution approving the Roseville Housing Authority budget for FY2025-26, and 3) Adopt a resolution approving the Roseville Finance Authority budget for FY2025-26.
BACKGROUND
CITYWIDE BUDGET
Fiscal Summary: The FY2025-26 proposed expenditure budget totals approximately $827.2 million from all funding sources.
Positions: The proposed budget includes a net increase of 19.75 positions that align with the City Council's strategic plan and address critical service level requirements. These recommended positions will increase the total citywide position count from 1,392 to 1,412. The citywide position allocation schedule is incorporated into the FY2025-26 budget document.
City Council Strategic Plan Goals: The following City Council strategic plan goals guided the budget
process. The FY2025-26 budget document highlights the budget augmentations, accomplishments, City services, and performance measures aligned with these goals:
• Ensure a safe and healthy community
• Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world
• Enhance economic vitality
• Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth
• Support community engagement and advocacy
• Deliver exceptional city services
Process: The proposed budget results from an extensive process that includes a City Council strategic planning workshop, budget development updates, utilities budget updates, a Capital Improvement Program budget overview, a financial policies update, and a Budget Workshop.
Awareness and Outreach: Public outreach on the budget includes posting budget information on the City's website, sending e-newsletters, and utilizing social media. The Proposed Budget and the Proposed Budget Overview can be viewed at Roseville.ca.us/budget and hard copies are available at each of the three libraries and the City Clerk’s Office.
Budget Ordinance: The annual budget ordinance includes the following modifications:
1. The ordinance was reorganized into the following subsections in Section 3:
o Budget Approval and Oversight
o Operating Budget
o Capital Improvement Projects and Non-Capital Multi-Year Projects o Budget Carry Forward
o Contingency Budgets
o Administrative Budget Revisions
2. Section 3.2.2 (new item) – The City Manager or designee is authorized to increase or decrease operating revenue estimates and/or operating expenditure appropriations up to a cumulative total of $75,000 per fund each fiscal year, provided adequate resources are available to fund the budget adjustment(s). This change provides flexibility to make minor budget adjustments throughout the year without requiring Council approval, ensuring more efficient financial management.
3. For eight items, “or designee” was added in instances where the City Manager is authorized to approve a specific budget change. These will now read “The City Manager or designee is authorized…” (Sections 3.3.4, 3.3.6, 3.3.7, 3.5.1, 3.5.2, 3.6.2, 3.6.3, 3.6.4). The phrase “or designee” was added to provide for backup approval authority in instances where the City Manager is unavailable.
GENERAL FUND
Fiscal Summary: The budget for the General Fund is $248.5 million, which includes operating ($235.6 million) and non-operating expenditures ($12.9 million). Per Council-adopted financial policies, the General Fund budget matches budgeted operating (i.e., ongoing) expenses with projected operating revenues, with
resources available to increase reserves up to Council-adopted targets. The proposed budget includes a transfer of approximately $800,000 from the City's Pension Reserve Trust Fund to address rising pension costs.
Measure B: The proposed budget includes $29.5 million in Measure B local sales tax revenues. These revenues allow the City to maintain current service levels, restore services, and strategically invest in highpriority areas while still achieving a balanced budget.
General Fund Stabilization Reserve Fund: The FY2025-26 budget includes a transfer of approximately $745,000 from the General Fund to the Stabilization Reserve Fund, bringing its total balance to $35.2 million or 15 percent of the General Fund operations budget. The General Fund Stabilization Reserve Fund may be utilized strategically to allow the City time to deliberately restructure its operations during an economic downturn, thereby minimizing service disruptions. The use of the Stabilization Reserve will only occur in the context of a Council-adopted long-term plan.
General Fund Emergency Reserve Fund: The FY2025-26 budget includes a transfer of approximately $495,000 from the General Fund to the Emergency Reserve Fund, bringing its total balance to $23.4 million or 10 percent of the General Fund operations budget. The purpose of this reserve is to have the ability to fund significant short-term unanticipated, non-recurring expenditures during declared emergencies should the need arise.
ROSEVILLE HOUSING AUTHORITY BUDGET
The Roseville Housing Authority (RHA) was established in October 1974 and administers the Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) Program, providing rental assistance to low-income residents to access quality, affordable, and safe housing. RHA ensures housing stability and economic self-sufficiency for up to 846 families, seniors, individuals with disabilities, and veterans annually. Rental assistance for income-qualified participants is paid directly to property owners participating in the Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) Program. The Housing Authority receives funding from the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Roseville's HCV program infuses over $11.2 million in federal funds into the local economy each year, including administrative revenue that covers most of the staff costs associated with administering the program.
Budget Analysis: RHA is a separate legal entity from the City; therefore, its budget is approved by its Board of Directors, which is composed of members of the City Council. Financial activities are audited annually as part of the citywide audit, and its financial statements are included in the City of Roseville's annual comprehensive financial report. The details for the FY2025-26 revenues and expenditures are presented in the Budget Item Detail (attached) and are further discussed below. RHA has budgeted $10,728,979 for Housing Assistance Payments (HAP). When a participating household finds rental housing that meets program requirements, written agreements are signed between the owner, tenant, and RHA, outlining their respective rights and responsibilities. Program participants pay approximately 30 percent of their income toward rent and utilities, and RHA pays the balance of the contract rent directly to the property owner each month. An additional $5,000 in fraud recovery for HAP payments is also included in the revenue estimate.
Rental Assistance Programs & Family Self-Sufficiency Funding/Revenue – Administration RHA administers regular Housing Choice Vouchers, Non-Elderly Disabled (NED), Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing (VASH), Mainstream, Emergency Housing (EHV), and Project-Based Vouchers. Each year, the Housing Authority also participates in HUD's Family Self-Sufficiency (FSS) Program, encouraging families assisted through the HCV Program to increase their earned income and reduce their dependency on state and federal assistance and rental subsidies. In the FSS program, each time a participant's income rises, a portion of their housing assistance payment is diverted to an interest-bearing account. During their participation in the FSS program, participants set goals to decrease their dependency on welfare subsidies. After five years, if participants complete the required objectives of their program plan, they receive the balance in their escrow account. They may use the funds for various needs, such as a down payment on a house, a car, education loans, or other items that further their self-sufficiency goals. During the last year, three voucher holders graduated from the five-year program with a combined total of approximately $17,000. HUD awards FSS grants to housing authorities that apply for the funding. The FSS funding for FY2025-26, at $86,486, offsets a portion of the salaries and benefits of the program coordinator and other staff who assist in administering the program.
Administrative and Other Miscellaneous Revenues
RHA earns administrative revenues based on the number of vouchers that have been leased. The estimated payments total $1,076,494. RHA also administers a portion of the HCV Program for tenants who live in the City of Rocklin. A minimum administrative fee is charged to recoup service costs, with $25,000 budgeted for FY2025-26 based on an existing agreement with the City of Rocklin. Interest and Fraud Recovery are estimated to be $5,600, for a total of $1,107,094.
Personnel and Other Administrative Costs
The following table illustrates the estimated revenues and expenditures required to manage the HCV program successfully in FY2025-26. Materials, supplies, and services and indirect costs total $216,050, and salaries, wages, and benefits are $1,064,394, for a total of $1,280,444. The net expenditures are estimated to exceed the revenue by $86,864. The estimated administrative equity in the fund balance of $682,982 will be used to fund $86,864 of expenses.
HAP Admin funds earned from projected leases: $1,076,494 FSS Administrative Funds: $86,486
Other Revenues (Rocklin, Repayments, and
Interest):
$30,600
Total Available Revenues & Resources: $1,193,580
Materials, Supplies, & Services: $113,578
Reimbursed Indirect Costs - Charged: $102,472
Salaries, Wages & Benefits: $1,064,394
Total Administrative Costs: $1,280,444
Net Revenue over Expenditures ($86,864)
ROSEVILLE FINANCE AUTHORITY BUDGET
Debt service payments of $1,892,503 reflect scheduled payments on the Certificates of Participation (COPs) for the Corporation Yard and 316 Vernon Street. The Authority has issued other bonds and COPs;
however, the debt service for these is reflected in the City's budget within each respective fund. For Community Facilities District (CFD) bond issues, the Authority acts as a conduit to collect payments through the County property tax levy process to repay the outstanding debt of these special districts.
Transfers out of the capital projects fund of $636,107 represent money to be transferred to the Citywide Parks Fund for the repayment of a loan from the Fleet Replacement Fund, which partially funded the construction of Harry Crabb Park. Additionally, $53,400 is to be transferred to four community facilities districts and applied as levy credits. Capital outlay is budgeted at $67,990 for the Crabb Park Improvements Project, which includes a horseshoe court conversion and parking lot upgrades.
The Roseville Finance Authority budget for FY2025-26 is attached.
FISCAL IMPACT
The City of Roseville FY2025-26 citywide budget document provides a financial summary for each fund, department, capital improvement project, and non-capital multi-year project. The FY2025-26 Roseville Housing Authority and FY2025-26 Roseville Finance Authority budgets show the financial summaries for those entities.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The City of Roseville FY2025-26 Citywide Budget, Position Allocation Schedule, Roseville Housing Authority Budget, and Roseville Finance Authority Budget meet the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
2. Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world
Respectfully Submitted,
Nancy Rothlisberger, Budget Manager
Scott Pettingell, Finance Director
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Ordinance 6961
2. Housing Authority Resolution 2-25
3. FY2025-26 Housing Authority Fund Summary
4. Finance Authority Resolution 2-25
5. FY2025-26 Roseville Finance Authority Budget
REVIEWERS:
Nancy Rothlisberger, Finance Department - Budget Created/Initiated - 5/30/2025 Nancy Rothlisberger, Finance Department - Budget Approved - 5/30/2025 Scott Pettingell, Finance Department - Budget Approved - 5/30/2025
Gretchen Hakala, City Attorney Department Approved - 6/2/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 6/5/2025
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/5/2025 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/5/2025 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 6/6/2025 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 6/6/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 6/6/2025
ORDINANCE NO. 6961
ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
ADOPTING THE ANNUAL BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-26,
ADOPTING BUDGET CONTROL POLICIES, ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT,
ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE ROSEVILLE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, TO BE EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY
AS AN URGENCY MEASURE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. The proposed budget for the City of Roseville entitled "Proposed Budget Fiscal Year 2025-26, City of Roseville, California,” a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk, is hereby adopted as the "Annual Budget Fiscal Year 2025-26, City of Roseville, California."
SECTION 2. The proposed expenses, expenditures, transfers out, revenues, and transfers in shown in the fund, department operating budget and project summaries of the budget document, which are incorporated herein, are hereby appropriated to the departments and activities in the amounts and purposes therein stated. Encumbrances, expenses and expenditures of the various appropriations described in the budget document shall be made by those departments and employees designated therein as the requisitioning authorities.
SECTION 3. The following budget control policies shall become effective upon the adoption of this ordinance:
3.1. Budget Approval and Oversight
3.1.1. The operating budget of the City of Roseville and the Successor Agency of the Roseville Redevelopment Agency shall be approved by the following major expenditure/expense summary categories:
a. Salaries and Wages
b. Benefits
c. Materials, Supplies, and Services
d. Internal Reimbursements
e. Capital Outlay
f. Debt Service
g. Transfers Out
3.1.2. The City Manager or designee shall apply prudent monitoring procedures to assure that actual expenditures/expenses of the City and the Successor Agency of the Roseville Redevelopment Agency do not exceed the appropriations at the department level by fund.
3.1.3. The City Manager and Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer are directed to ensure that the budget complies with City Council approved financial policies.
3.2. Operating Budget
3.2.1. The City Council delegates authority to the City Manager or designee to approve the movement of City Council approved appropriations within the same fund, excluding Capital Improvement and Non-Capital Multiyear Projects.
3.2.2. The City Manager or designee is authorized to increase or decrease operating revenue estimates and/or operating expenditure appropriations up to a cumulative total of $75,000 per fund each fiscal year, provided adequate resources are available to fund the budget adjustment(s).
3.3. Capital Improvement Projects and Non-Capital Multi-Year Projects
3.3.1. Capital Improvement Plan. The Capital Budget of the City of Roseville and the Successor Agency of the Roseville Redevelopment Agency shall be approved by Capital Improvement Project. Capital project appropriations shall be used solely for the original purpose approved by the City Council.
3.3.2. Non-Capital Multiyear Projects. The non-capital multiyear project budget for the City of Roseville and the Successor Agency of the Roseville Redevelopment Agency shall be approved by Non-Capital Multiyear Project. Non-Capital project appropriations shall be used solely for the original purpose approved by the City Council.
3.3.3. City Council approval is required to establish or cancel (without completion) new Capital Improvement Projects or Non-Capital Multi-Year Projects.
3.3.4. The City Manager or designee is authorized to increase or decrease Capital Improvement Projects and Non-Capital Multiyear Projects revenues and/or expenditure budgets by up to $75,000 each, provided adequate resources are available to fund the budget adjustment(s).
3.3.5. The City Manager or designee is authorized to change project numbers or other project attributes which do not increase total project appropriations by fund and is consistent with City Council intent.
3.3.6. The City Manager or designee is authorized to adjust the revenue and expenditure budget for the Development Services reimbursable development projects to match the actual amount of revenues received and expenditures incurred each fiscal year.
3.3.7. The City Manager or designee is authorized to adjust the Development Services revenue budget for the General Plan Update Fee to reflect actual revenues received and adjust the expenditure budget by a like amount in the General Plan Update CIP.
3.3.8. Annually, completed or inactive Capital Improvement Projects and Non-Capital Multi-Year Projects will be closed, except for projects that have existing litigation, payment disputes or other extenuating circumstances. An inactive project is defined as one where transaction activity is less than $1,000 over the prior three years.
Closures are the responsibility of the designated project manager. The managing department and the City Manager or designee have the authority to take the necessary steps to close completed or inactive projects, including appropriate decreases to the budget for unspent appropriations and/or uncollected revenues.
3.4. Budget Carry Forward
3.4.1. All encumbrances for valid purchase orders in effect as of June 30, 2025, will remain in effect in the following fiscal year. The City Manager or designee is authorized to increase the Fiscal Year 2025-26 budget appropriations, and any associated revenue or reimbursement budgets, in the amount of the outstanding encumbrances for valid purchase orders and contracts as of June 30, 2025.
3.4.2. The City Manager or designee is authorized to increase the Fiscal Year 2025-26 budget appropriations for the remaining unspent appropriations from the prior fiscal year for City Council approved fleet replacement.
3.4.3. The City Manager or designee is authorized to carry forward any unspent appropriations in Capital Improvement and Non-Capital Multi-Year Projects.
3.5. Contingency Budgets
3.5.1. The City Manager or designee is authorized to increase appropriations in any department or project from the General Fund Administrative Contingency.
3.5.2. The City Manager or designee is authorized to increase appropriations in the Environmental Utilities funds from the respective fund’s contingency budget.
3.6. Administrative Budget Revisions
3.6.1. The City Manager or designee is authorized to eliminate funds, including increasing appropriations for transfers between funds up to $75,000, as required for proper accounting and fiscal management when the purpose of a fund has expired.
3.6.2. The City Manager or designee is authorized to revise any appropriation made in the Adopted Budget where the revision does not increase total appropriations by fund and is consistent with City Council intent.
3.6.3. The City Manager or designee is authorized to increase revenue estimates and appropriations for Council-approved bond issuances.
3.6.4. The City Manager or designee is authorized to refine/add content, as may be needed to meet Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) and California Society of Municipal Finance Officers (CSMFO) budgeting award requirements, in the Proposed Budget to create the FY2025-26 Approved Budget.
SECTION 4. Pursuant to Article XIII B of the California Constitution, the appropriations limit for the City of Roseville is hereby established in the FY2025-26 Approved Budget. The State Department of Finance provides the City the annual adjustment factors used in the appropriation limit calculation. The factors are the changes in the California Per Capita Personal Income and population levels for the City or the County.
SECTION 5. It is hereby ordered that a copy of this ordinance and the budget document be certified by the City Clerk and filed in the office of the City Clerk. The City Clerk is directed to post a copy of this ordinance in three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and enter the posting thereof in the Ordinance Book.
SECTION 6. This ordinance is required for the orderly operation and maintenance of municipal activities and the appropriations for usual and current expenses of the City and the Successor Agency of the Roseville Redevelopment Agency during the 2025-26 fiscal year.
Therefore, this ordinance shall take effect immediately upon passage hereof as an urgency ordinance, pursuant to Section 5.03 of the Charter of the City of Roseville.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2025, by the following vote on roll call:
AYE COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
1 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
RESOLUTION NO. 2-25
APPROVING THE ANNUAL BUDGET FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
WHEREAS, the Housing Authority of the City of Roseville has reviewed the proposed Housing Authority Budget, Fiscal Year 2025-26, attached hereto as Exhibit “A”.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Housing Authority of the City of Roseville does hereby resolve that the Housing Authority of the City of Roseville Budget, Fiscal Year 2025-26, is hereby approved.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Housing Authority of the City of Roseville this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:
AYES AUTHORITY MEMBERS:
NOES AUTHORITY MEMBERS:
ABSENT AUTHORITY MEMBERS:
CHAIRMAN
Secretary
2 EXHIBIT “A”
TotalExpenses/Expenditures 10,728,979
ROSEVILLE HOUSING AUTHORITY
Department Requested Budget Item Detail
Revenue and Transfers-In
FY2025-26
Working Budget
Housing Authority Housing Choice Voucher
4401 - Federal Grants 1,076,494
4435 - Other Grants (FSS Grant) 86,486
4435 - Other Grants 25,000
4451 - Interest Revenue 600
4736 - Section 8 Tenant Reimbursement 5,000
Total Revenue and Transfers-In: 1,193,580
Expenses/Expenditures and Transfers Out
2801 - Housing Authority Housing Choice
Voucher
5201 - Fuel 500
5301 - Professional Services 47,741
5351 - Office Supplies 1,000
5369 - Supplies - Program And Event 1,000
5385 - Subscriptions 2,500
5387 - Advertising 900
5389 - Printing 3,500
5391 - Postage 6,000
5393 - Software 26,096
5395 - Equipment - Under 5000 1,000
5399 - Equipment - Technology Under 5000 1,000
5461 - Training And Development 10,585
5471 - Membership 3,100
5510 - Automotive - vehicle usage 3,456
5512 - Automotive - replacement 4,200
5524 - Facility - demand services 1,000
5570 - Grants
5901- Reimbursed Indirect Cost - Charged 102,472
5911 - Reimbursed Cost - Charged (Salaries, 1,064,394
Wages, and Benefits)
Total Expenses/Expenditures and 1,280,444
Transfers Out:
Housing Assistant Payments
4401 - Federal Grants 10,728,979
4451 - Interest Revenue 600
4736 - Section 8 Tenant Reimbursement 5,000
Total Revenue 10,734,579
5578 - Grants - HousingAssistance Payments 10,728,979
(86,864) Net Revenue over
Expenses/Expenditures:
HOUSING AUTHORITY
Annual Budget Fund Summary
Actual
FY2023-24
Estimated
FY2024-25
Budget
FY2025-26
FUND BALANCE RESERVED (HAP) $ 18,301 $ 36,811 $ 62,635
UNRESERVED, DESIGNATED FUND BALANCE (ADMIN) 606,800 798,794 682,982
ACTUAL & ESTIMATED REVENUES - HAP
Operating Grants - HUD 9,788,688 10,885,596 10,728,979
Fraud Recovery - HUD 4,225 11,000 5,000
Interest on Investments - HAP 617 650 600
Total HAP Revenues 9,793,529 10,897,246 10,734,579
ACTUAL & ESTIMATED REVENUES - ADMIN
Administrative Fees - HUD 1,447,742 1,084,203 1,076,494 Other Revenue
FSS Coordinator Grant - HUD 79,200 83,160 86,486
Admin Fee - City of Rocklin 20,000 25,000 25,000
Fraud Recovery - Admin 4,224 11,000 5,000
Interest on Investments - Admin 617 650 600
Total Admin Revenues 1,551,783 1,204,013 1,193,580
Total Estimated Available for Appropriation $ 11,970,413 $ 12,936,864 $ 12,673,776
LESS ACTUAL & ESTIMATED HAP EXPENDITURES
HAP - Payments to Landlords 9,775,019 10,871,422 10,728,979 Total HAP Expenditures 9,775,019 10,871,422 10,728,979
LESS ACTUAL & ESTIMATED ADMIN EXPENDITURES
Salaries & Benefits - Admin 682,861 1,024,520 977,908
Salaries & Benefits - FSS Coordinator 72,824 83,160 86,486 Materials Supply and Services Operating Expenses 508,305 112,240 113,578 Indirect Costs 95,798 99,905 102,472
Total Admin Expenditures 1,359,788 1,319,825 1,280,444
FUND BALANCE RESERVED (HAP-RNP) 36,811 62,635 68,235
UNRESERVED FUND BALANCE (ADMIN - UNP) 798,794 682,982 596,118 TOTAL ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 835,605 $ 745,617 $ 664,353
ROSEVILLE FINANCE AUTHORITY
RESOLUTION NO. 2-25
ADOPTING THE ANNUAL BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
WHEREAS, the Roseville Finance Authority desires to approve the Roseville Finance Authority Budget FY2025-26.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Roseville Finance Authority does hereby resolve that the attached Roseville Finance Authority Budget FY2025-26 is hereby approved.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Roseville Finance Authority this __ day of _______, 2025, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES AGENCY MEMBERS:
NOES AGENCY MEMBERS:
ABSENT AGENCY MEMBERS:
__________________________________
CHAIR
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Secretary
Roseville Finance Authority
Debt Service Capital Projects Total Debt Service Capital Projects Total Debt Service Capital Projects Total
NONOPERATING REVENUES
Refunding Bond Savings 1,362,528 1,362,528 - 1,374,597 1,374,597 - 1,361,711 1,361,711 Transfer In $ 2,373,626 - 2,373,626 $ 1,998,607 - 1,998,607 $ 1,892,503 - 1,892,503 Interest Revenue - 178,514 178,514 - 57,150 57,150 - 56,483 56,483 Total Revenues 2,373,626 1,541,042 3,914,668 1,998,607 1,431,747 3,430,354 1,892,503 1,418,194 3,310,697
LESS OPERATING EXPENSES
Bank Fees - 87 87 - 100 100 - - -
Total Operating Expenses - 87 87 100 100 - -
LESS NONOPERATING EXPENSES
Transfers Out - - - - 696,632 696,632 - 689,507 689,507 Capital Outlay - 52,067 52,067 - 2,334,000 2,334,000 - 67,990 67,990 Debt Service 2,372,247 - 2,372,247 1,876,866 - 1,876,866 1,892,503 - 1,892,503 Total Capital and Debt Expenses 2,372,247 52,067 2,424,314 1,876,866 3,030,632 4,907,498 1,892,503 757,497 2,650,000 INCREASE (DECREASE) FROM OPERATIONS 1,380 1,488,888 1,490,267 121,741 (1,598,985) (1,477,244) (0) 660,698 660,698 FUND BALANCE, BEGINNING OF YEAR (110,053) 4,284,423 4,174,370 (108,674) 5,773,311 5,664,637 13,068 4,174,326 4,187,393 INCREASE (DECREASE) FROM OPERATIONS 1,380 1,488,888 1,490,267 121,741 (1,598,985) (1,477,244) (0) 660,698 660,698 FUND BALANCE, END OF YEAR $ (108,674) $ 5,773,311 $ 5,664,637 $ 13,068 $ 4,174,326 $ 4,187,393 $ 13,067 $ 4,835,023 $ 4,848,091 Actual FY 2024 Amended Budget FY 2025 Budget FY 2026