Cities Index.
Agenda packet, regular meeting

Roseville City Council
June 18, 2025

Document
Agenda packet, regular meeting
Meeting
June 18, 2025
Body
Roseville City Council
Pages
1,881
Original file
139.7 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on rosevilleca.api.civicclerk.com. That file is the official record.

Contract Purchase Agreement 3004476
Pyrotechnics:____
General Liability:
$5 Million/occurrence
$10 Million aggregate
Auto - $2 Million/occurrence
Chemical/Environmental:____
General Liability:
$3 Million/occurrence
$6 Million aggregate
Pollution – $2 Million/Occurrence
Auto - $2 Million/Occurrence
Insurance Submission Process
The City of Roseville Human Resources/Risk Management Department uses a service called EBIX to manage our insurance certificate tracking.

How It Works
● The vendor's contact information is entered into EBIX. EBIX will contact the vendor to request proof of insurance.
● The Vendor can forward the request to their Insurance Agent(s) if necessary. ● Vendor/Insurance Agent submits insurance to EBIX by email to [email protected] or by fax to (770) 325-5727. After faxing or emailing the certificate, please DO NOT send the certificate by mail to EBIX. Please do not mail, email or fax any certificates to the City of Roseville. ● Once submitted, EBIX reviews the insurance documentation. If there are deficiencies, EBIX will send a follow up letter or email requesting additional information.

Questions Regarding Insurance Submission: Contact EBIX at (951) 652-4239 Questions Regarding Insurance Requirements Contact Risk Management at (916) 774-5202 9 Docusign Envelope ID: 6654C611-F8C0-41D4-A986-F73FD7C798BE

Page 788 of 1881 ends

Contract Purchase Agreement 3004476
Asbestos-Containing Materials in City-Owned Buildings
California Health and Safety Code Section 25915 requires that all City of Roseville employees, contractors and lessees be notified annually of the presence of asbestos in City-owned buildings constructed prior to 1979. Please post this notice in an area(s) accessible to all employees, contractors and lessees. Contact Facility Maintenance & Operations at (916) 774-5740 for more information about Asbestos Containing Materials (ACMs) in specific City-owned buildings. For more information about asbestos refer to the OSHA website.

The City of Roseville is committed to maintaining a safe and healthy work environment. The City' s Facility Maintenance & Operations staff conducts ongoing inspections to identify and safely manage previously installed asbestos-containing products. Renovation of City-owned buildings MUST be reviewed in advance by Facility Maintenance & Operations to ensure the City is in compliance with building codes, Americans with Disabilities Act and that no ACMs are disturbed without proper safeguards. Work that requires removal or repair of ACMs is restricted to trained and qualified persons only. Facility Maintenance & Operations will need to approve the qualified contractors.

Use the following measures to protect you and others from exposure to airborne asbestos:
● Presume all building materials contain asbestos until determined otherwise by Facility Maintenance & Operations.
● Do not install walls, closets, cabinets, ceilings.
● Do not remove, cut, drill, sand, grind or otherwise disturb any material in the buildings, including carpet and tile.
● Do not paint (this includes any walls, ceilings, floors and electrostatic painting of office furniture).
● Do not remove any items nailed or screwed to the walls (this includes pictures, cabinets, electrical, etc.).
● Do not go above ceilings, behind walls or into building spaces such as attics and crawlspaces unless these areas have been inspected and cleared by Facility Maintenance & Operations.
● Do not pull cable or wiring through above-ceiling spaces with asbestos. ● Do not install screws, pins, nails or hangers into asbestos ceiling or wall plaster. ● Be careful not to damage walls, ceilings or floors when moving furniture or equipment.

It is recommended that Facility Maintenance & Operations be contacted prior to moving furniture or equipment.
● Do not brush, sweep or vacuum textured asbestos ceiling plaster or plaster debris. ● Immediately report any damage or deterioration of suspect building materials to Facility Maintenance & Operations or Risk Management.

It is important to note that the presence of asbestos does not mean you have been exposed.

Exposure results when friable asbestos particles are inhaled or ingested. Asbestos becomes friable when material containing asbestos is drilled, sanded or disturbed by remodeling or demolition work or when the ACM has deteriorated. Intact, bonded, sealed or undisturbed asbestos does not pose a hazard.

Employees may review the asbestos survey reports, results of bulk sampling or air monitoring conducted in City-owned buildings. All asbestos data will be available by appointment with Facility Maintenance & Operations.
10 Docusign Envelope ID: 6654C611-F8C0-41D4-A986-F73FD7C798BE

Page 789 of 1881 ends

Contract Purchase Agreement 3004476
Sign to acknowledge receipt of asbestos notification:

Asbestos
Rev 01/16/19
11 Docusign Envelope ID: 6654C611-F8C0-41D4-A986-F73FD7C798BE Specialized Elevator Services LLC dba
Elevator Industries
5/20/2025

Page 790 of 1881 ends

Contract Purchase Agreement 3004476

CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD REGULATION COMPLIANCE
Please indicate whether the Contractor is subject to, and/or in compliance with, the following regulations of the California Air Resources Board.

In-Use Off-Road Diesel-Fueled Fleets Regulation
1) Will vehicles subject to Cal. Code Regs., tit. 13, §§ 2449 et seq. be used for the project? This includes, but is not limited to:
a) Vehicles with a diesel-fueled or alternative diesel fueled off-road compressionignition engine with maximum power (max hp) of 25 horsepower (hp) or greater provided that the vehicle cannot be registered and driven safely on-road or was not designed to be driven on-road, even if it has been modified so that it can be driven safely on-road
b) Workover rigs
c) Certain two-engine vehicles
Yes ____ No ____
2) If you answered "Yes" to 1), you must submit a valid Certificate of Reported Compliance to the City as provided in Cal. Code Regs., tit. 13, § 2449(n).

Advanced Clean Fleets Regulation
Pursuant to Cal. Code Regs., tit. 13, § 2013(i)(1), the Contractor shall submit to the City a document evidencing that it is listed on the CARB Advanced Clean Fleets webpage as a compliant fleet OR a signed statement stating that it is not subject to the High Priority and Federal Fleets regulation of title 13, CCR section 2015 through 2015.6.

The High Priority Fleets regulation applies to, without limitation, entities with more than $50 million in gross annual revenues and/or which own, operate, or direct the operation of 50 or more vehicles in the total fleet.
1) Is the Contractor subject to the High Priority and Federal Fleets regulation of title 13, CCR section 2015 through 2015.6?
Yes ____ No ____
2) If you answered "Yes" to 1), you must submit a document evidencing that you are listed on the CARB Advanced Clean Fleets webpage as a compliant fleet.

Signature: _____________________________
Title: __________________________________
CARB Compliance
Rev 2/15/24 MC
12 Docusign Envelope ID: 6654C611-F8C0-41D4-A986-F73FD7C798BE X
X
President

Page 791 of 1881 ends

Contract Purchase Agreement 3004476
Supplier
Signature:______________________________________________ Print Name:_____________________________________________ Title:__________________________________________________ Date: __________________________________________________ Supplier
Signature:______________________________________________ Print Name:_____________________________________________ Title:__________________________________________________ Date: __________________________________________________ City of Roseville, A Municipal Corporation
Signature:______________________________________________ Print Name: Dominick Casey
Title: City Manager
Date:__________________________________________________ 13 Docusign Envelope ID: 6654C611-F8C0-41D4-A986-F73FD7C798BE Donovan McKeever
5/20/2025
President

Page 792 of 1881 ends

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 6/18/2025
Item #: VII.15
File #: 0721
Item ID: 2025-272
Title: Fiscal Year 2024-25 Transportation Development Act Claim Contact: Cameron Schreiter 916-746-1302 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2024-25 Transportation Development Act (TDA) claim in the amount of $12,563,878 for the City's transit and transportation funding, authorization for the City Manager or his designee to execute the claim on behalf of the City, and approval of payment of FY2024- 25 Local Transportation Fund (LTF) funds to Placer County Transportation Planning Agency in the amount of $59,547 for Roseville's share of the Countywide Zero-Emission Vehicle Infrastructure Plan Grant Match.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt a resolution to approve the Fiscal Year (FY) 2024-25 Transportation Development Act (TDA) claim in the amount of $12,563,878 and authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute the claim on behalf of the City; and

2. Approve payment of FY2024-25 Local Transportation Fund (LTF) funds to Placer County Transportation Planning Agency (PCTPA) in the amount of $59,547 for Roseville's share of the Countywide Zero-Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Infrastructure Plan Grant Match.

BACKGROUND
The Placer County Transportation Planning Agency (PCTPA) has adopted the FY2024-25 Final Findings of Apportionment for the Local Transportation Fund (LTF), State Transit Assistance (STA), and Senate Bill 1 (SB 1) State of Good Repair (SGR). Together, these programs comprise the Transportation Development Act (TDA) resources. LTF revenue comes from a 1/4 cent sales tax in Placer County and is used for local transportation programs. The adopted LTF apportionment resulted in $10,865,437 in LTF available to Roseville for FY2024-25. Of the City's LTF revenue, $59,547 is recommended to be paid to PCTPA for Roseville's share of a Countywide ZEV Infrastructure Plan. In June 2024, PCTPA received a Federal Carbon Reduction Program grant from SACOG to develop a Countywide ZEV Infrastructure Plan for Placer County. This grant will be used to, among other things, identify ZEV infrastructure gaps and develop a method to identify potential sites, assess electrical grid capacity to support and sustain increased ZEV usage, and to assess clean mobility options and strategies to improve ZEV usage. The grant required a $155,473 local match, which was split up by population to each Placer County jurisdiction. The $59,547 is Roseville’s portion of the local match for this plan.

STA revenue is derived from state diesel fuel excise taxes with augmentation from SB1 funds. STA funds are applied to administration, operations, maintenance, and capital projects for the City's transit system. The total STA funds available to Roseville in FY2024-25 is $1,468,986.

SB 1's State of Good Repair (SGR) program provides needed funding towards maintenance of the Roseville Transit bus fleet. The SGR program is funded by a portion of the State Transportation Improvement Fee on vehicle registrations. The amount of SGR funds available to Roseville in FY2024-25 is $229,455. Combining LTF, STA and SGR funds equals a total request of

Page 793 of 1881 ends

$12,563,878.

FISCAL IMPACT
The TDA claim provides a total of $12,563,878 in revenues to the Transportation and Transit Fund programs and projects. The payment of $59,547 for the ZEV Infrastructure Plan will be from LTF funds.

There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378.

Submission of the FY2023/24 Transportation Development Act Claim action meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

2. Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world

4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Cameron Schreiter, Transportation Grants Analyst
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 25-195

2. 00 - FY 2024-25 Final Apportionments

3. 01 - TDA Claim Forms FY 2024-25 Filled v4

4. 02 - FY_2024_5_TDAClaimWorksheet Final

5. 03 - FY_2024_5 TDA Claim Financial Plan Worksheet Final REVIEWERS:

Ed Scofield, Public Works Department - Transportation Created/Initiated - 5/21/2025 Ed Scofield, Public Works Department - Transportation Approved - 5/21/2025 Jason Shykowski, Public Works Department - All Approved - 5/22/2025 Gretchen Hakala, City Attorney Department Approved - 5/27/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 6/2/2025
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/3/2025 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/4/2025 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 6/6/2025 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 6/6/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 6/6/2025

Page 794 of 1881 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 25-195
APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF THE 2024/25 TRANSPORTATION

DEVELOPMENT ACT CLAIMS TO THE

PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY
WHEREAS, the California Public Utilities Code, commencing with Section 99200, and Title 21 of the California Code of Regulations, commencing with Section 6600, authorize local transportation funding available through the Local Transportation Fund and State Transit Assistance Fund established by the Transportation Development Act; and WHEREAS, the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency is responsible for reviewing and approving annual transportation claims, and for making allocations from the Local Transportation Fund and State Transit Assistance Funds.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Roseville hereby authorizes and directs the City Manager to execute the FY2024/25 Transportation Development Act Claims in the amount of $12,563,878 to the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency as follows:

1. Local Transportation Funds for public transportation system purposes as authorized by Article 4, commencing with Section 99260 of the California Public Utilities Code and for streets and roads purposes authorized by Article 8, commencing with Section 99400 of the California Public Utilities Code, in an aggregate amount not to exceed $10,865,437.

2. State Transit Assistance Funds for transit operations, as authorized by Section 99313 and Section 99314 of the California Public Utilities Code, Chapter 4, Article 6.5, in an aggregate amount not to exceed $1,468,986.

3. State of Good Repair Funds for transit maintenance as provided by in Senate Bill 1, in an aggregate amount not to exceed $229,455.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of __________________________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
___________________________
City Clerk

Page 795 of 1881 ends

FY 2023/2024 FY 2024/2025 FY 2024/2025
Estimated Fund Revenue Apportionment
Balance Subtotal (1) Subtotal Total
$933,882 $32,109,843 $32,945,558

2.44923904% $770,305 $770,305
$110,085 $110,085
TRPA TOTAL $770,305 $880,390
$264 $264
$880,126

97.55076096% $31,339,538 $31,339,538
$823,797 $725,630
PCTPA TOTAL $31,339,538 $32,065,168
$8,736 $8,736
$475,000 $475,000
$16,476 $617,116.04 $633,592
$36,329 $1,360,741 $1,397,070
$770,992 $28,877,945 $29,550,770
Population FY 2024/2025 FY 2023/2024 Carryover Revenue
January 1, 2024 Allocation Subtotal Apportionment(6) Apportionment PLACER COUNTY 101,964 25.30500819% $7,282,725 $195,099 $7,477,825 AUBURN 13,218 3.28038914% $944,089 $25,292 $969,380
COLFAX 1,988 0.49337370% $141,992 $3,804 $145,796
LINCOLN 53,231 13.21065171% $3,801,996 $101,853 $3,903,849 LOOMIS 6,601 1.63820916% $471,473 $12,630 $484,103
ROCKLIN 71,609 17.77162853% $5,114,635 $137,018 $5,251,653 ROSEVILLE 154,329 38.30073956% $11,022,868 $295,295 $11,318,163 TOTAL 402,940 100.00% $28,779,778 $770,992 $29,550,770
Revenue Planning Available to
Apportionment Contribution(7) Claimant(8)
PLACER COUNTY $7,477,825 ($299,113) $7,178,712
AUBURN $969,380 ($38,775) $930,605
COLFAX $145,796 ($5,832) $139,964
LINCOLN $3,903,849 ($156,154) $3,747,695
LOOMIS $484,103 ($19,364) $464,739
ROCKLIN $5,251,653 ($210,066) $5,041,587
ROSEVILLE $11,318,163 ($452,727) $10,865,437
TOTAL $29,550,770 ($1,182,031) $28,368,739
NOTES:
4) Pedestrian and Bicycle Allocation is 2% of the remaining apportionment, per PCTPA Board direction. 5) Community Transit Service Article 4.5 allocation is up to 5% of the remaining apportionment, per PCTPA Board direction.

FY 2024/25 Article 4.5 allocation is set at 4.5%.

TRPA Population2 9,904 2.39896910%
PCTPA Population 402,940 97.60103090%
TOTAL 412,844 100.00000000%
1) FY 2023/24 LTF balance based on August 1, 2024 Final LTF Fund Estimate provided by the Placer County Auditor

1. Table E-1: City/County Population Estimates January 1, 2023 to January 1, 2024, DOF, released May 2, 2024. 8) Assumes 0% growth in revenue over FY 2024/25 per LAO sales tax projections.

LTF balance has been adjusted for claims owed to jurisdictions and online sales tax adjustment per HDL to occur during FY 2024/25. 3) Apportioned per Section 7.1 PCTPA Rules & Bylaws for FY 2022/23 Final Overall Work Program and Budget, May 25, 2022. 2) Tahoe Regional Planning Agency receives funds proportional to its population within Placer County (see box below). 6) FY 2023/24 carryover apportionment (see next page) uses May 2024 DOF population estimates. 7) PCTPA receives 4% of apportionment for regional planning purposes and implementation of federal planning requirements.

2. Western Slope and Tahoe Basin for Placer County as of January 1, 2024, DOF, June 28, 2024.

County Auditor Administrative Costs

BALANCE AVAILABLE FOR APPORTIONMENT BY PCTPA
Sources:

Jurisdiction
PCTPA Administrative and Planning Costs (3)
January 1, 2024 DOF Population Estimates1
Community Transit Service Article 4.5 Allocation (5)
Apportionment of FY 2024/2025 PCTPA LTF Revenue Estimate Available to Claimant Apportionment of FY 2024/2025 PCTPA LTF Revenue Estimate by Jurisdiction Pedestrian and Bicycle Allocation (4)
Jurisdiction Percent (%)

BALANCE AVAILABLE FOR APPORTIONMENT BY TRPA
County Auditor Administrative Costs
PCTPA LTF Fund Balance
TRPA LTF Fund Balance
FINAL FINDINGS OF APPORTIONMENT FOR FY 2024/2025
September 2024

PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY (PCTPA)
PCTPA Revenue Estimate

PLACER COUNTY LTF REVENUE ESTIMATE

LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND (LTF)
TRPA Revenue Estimate (2)
Printed:8/29/2024
6

Page 796 of 1881 ends

Amount of FY 2023/2024 Carryover:

POPULATION
JURISDICTION January 1,
2024(1) PERCENT
FY 2024/2025

CARRYOVER

ALLOCATION
TOTAL

CARRYOVER

ALLOCATION
PLACER COUNTY 101,964 25.31% $195,099 $195,099
AUBURN 13,218 3.28% $25,292 $25,292
COLFAX 1,988 0.49% $3,804 $3,804
LINCOLN 53,231 13.21% $101,853 $101,853
LOOMIS 6,601 1.64% $12,630 $12,630
ROCKLIN 71,609 17.77% $137,018 $137,018
ROSEVILLE 154,329 38.30% $295,295 $295,295
TOTAL 402,940 100.00% $770,992 $770,992
Sources:

2. FY 2023/24 LTF balance based on August 1, 2024 Final LTF Fund Estimate provided by the Placer County Auditor (adjusted for anticipated online sales tax adjustments).

Calculation of FY 2024/2025 PCTPA LTF Carryover
$770,992

1. Table E-1: City/County Population Estimates January 1, 2023 to January 1, 2024, DOF, May 2, 2024.

Using 2024 Population - Western Slope
Printed:8/29/2024
7

Page 797 of 1881 ends

$3,755,942
$534,814
$4,290,756
$169,017
$4,121,739
January PUC 99313 PUC 99313
Jurisdiction 2024 Population Population
Population(3) Percentage Allocation
Placer County 101,964 25.31% $907,672
Auburn 13,218 3.28% $117,665
Colfax 1,988 0.49% $17,697
Lincoln 53,231 13.21% $473,856
Loomis 6,601 1.64% $58,761
Rocklin 71,609 17.77% $637,455
Roseville 154,329 38.30% $1,373,819
TOTAL 402,940 100.00% $3,586,925
Notes: (1) 2024/2025 State Transit Assistance Allocation Final Estimate, California State Controller Division of Accounting and Reporting, August 1, 2024. (2) 4.5% of unencumbered PUC 99313 Allocation is allocated to WPCTSA. (3) Table E-1: City/County Population Estimates January 1, 2023 to January 1, 2024, DOF, released May 2, 2024.

PUC = Public Utilities Code
PUC 99314 PUC 99314 PUC 99314 Total
Jurisdiction Fare Revenue Fare Revenue Fare Revenue Jurisdiction Basis(4) Percentage Allocation Allocation
Placer County $5,410,141 81.9% $437,879 $1,345,551
Auburn $21,830 0.3% $1,767 $119,432
Colfax $0 0.0% $0 $17,697
Lincoln $0 0.0% $0 $473,856
Loomis $0 0.0% $0 $58,761
Rocklin $0 0.0% $0 $637,455
Roseville $1,175,827 17.8% $95,168 $1,468,986
TOTAL $6,607,798 100.0% $534,814 $4,121,739
Notes: (4) 2024/2025 State Transit Assistance Allocation Preliminary Estimate, California State Controller Division of Accounting and Reporting, February 1, 2024.

FY 2024/2025 Jurisdiction PUC Section 99313 STA Fund Allocation FY 2023/2024 Jurisdiction PUC 99314 STA Fund Allocation PUC Section 99313 +
99314
Less 4.5 Percent Allocation of PUC 99313 to WPCTSA(2)
Total STA Allocation Available to Jurisdictions
September 2024
(EXCLUDING TAHOE BASIN)

PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY
FY 2024/25 STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE (STA) FUND FINAL ALLOCATION ESTIMATE PUC 99313 Allocation
PUC 99314 Allocation
Total STA Allocation(1)
1 9/11/2024
8

Page 798 of 1881 ends

$561,914
$80,012
$641,926
$0
$641,926
January PUC 99313 PUC 99313 Reallocation PUC 99313
Jurisdiction 2024 Population Population to Transit Total Population(2) Percentage Allocation Operator(3) Allocation Placer County 101,964 25.31% $142,192 $186,071 $328,264 Auburn 13,218 3.28% $18,433 $0 $18,433
Colfax 1,988 0.49% $2,772 ($2,772) $0
Lincoln 53,231 13.21% $74,233 ($74,233) $0
Loomis 6,601 1.64% $9,205 ($9,205) $0
Rocklin 71,609 17.77% $99,861 ($99,861) $0
Roseville 154,329 38.30% $215,217 $0 $215,217
TOTAL 402,940 100.00% $561,914 ($0) $561,914
(3) Placer County Transit will apply the equivalent SGR PUC 99313 shares from the Cities of Colfax, Lincoln, Rocklin, and the Town of Loomis to preventive maintenance.

PUC 99314 PUC 99314 PUC 99314 Total
Jurisdiction Fare Revenue Fare Revenue Fare Revenue Jurisdiction Basis(4) Percentage Allocation Allocation
Placer County $5,410,141 81.9% $65,510 $393,774
Auburn $21,830 0.3% $264 $18,697
Colfax $0 0.0% $0 $0
Lincoln $0 0.0% $0 $0
Loomis $0 0.0% $0 $0
Rocklin $0 0.0% $0 $0
Roseville $1,175,827 17.8% $14,238 $229,455
TOTAL $6,607,798 100.0% $80,012 $641,926
FY 2024/25
Jurisdiction Allocation
Amount
Placer County $393,774
Auburn $18,697
Roseville $229,455
FY 2024/25 Total $641,926
FY 2024/2025 SGR Project Summary
Project Title
FY 2024/2025 Jurisdiction PUC Section 99314 SGR Fund Allocation Notes: (4) FY 2024/2025 State of Good Repair Final Allocation Estimate, California State Controller Division of Accounting and Reporting, August 1, 2024.

Bus Stop Improvement and Replacement Program
Maintenance and Replacement of 35' Bus
Ford E-Transit Van Purchase
FY 2024/2025 Jurisdiction PUC Section 99313 SGR Fund Allocation

PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY
September 2024
(EXCLUDING TAHOE BASIN)
FY 2024/2025 STATE OF GOOD REPAIR (SGR) FINAL ALLOCATION ESTIMATE Notes: (1) FY 2024/2025 State of Good Repair Final Allocation Estimate, California State Controller Division of Accounting and Reporting, February 1, 2024 (2) Table E-1: City/County Population Estimates January 1, 2023 to January 1, 2024, DOF, released May 2, 2024.

PUC 99313 Allocation
PUC 99314.8 Allocation
Total SGR Allocation(1)
Less Percent Allocation of PUC 99313 to WPCTSA (5% max) Total SGR Allocation Available to Jurisdictions
9/11/2024
9

Page 799 of 1881 ends

Transportation Development Act
Claim Forms

Page 800 of 1881 ends

Revised September 2024
Contents
TDA CLAIM FORMS ....................................................................................................................................................2

ANNUAL VERIFICATION OF TDA COMPLIANCE TO ACCOMPANY LTF AND STA CLAIMS FOR TRANSIT / STREETS AND ROADS PURPOSES...........................................................................................................................3 STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE QUALIFYING CRITERIA WORKSHEET INSTRUCTIONS.............................................6 CLAIM FOR LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS...................................................Error! Bookmark not defined.

CLAIM FOR STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDS..............................................................................................7 CLAIM FOR STATE OF GOOD REPAIR PROGRAM FUNDS..................................................................................8 TDA ANNUAL PROJECT AND FINANCIAL PLAN......................................................................................................9 LTF BICYCLE / PEDESTRIAN CLAIM FORMS ......................................................................................................... 110 CLAIM FOR BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FUNDS ............................................................................................ 121 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND FINANCIAL PLAN .................................................... 132 SAMPLE RESOLUTION........................................................................................................................................... 143

Page 801 of 1881 ends

2 Revised September 2024

PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY

TDA CLAIM FORMS

TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT (TDA) CLAIM FORMS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO PCTPA A MINIMUM OF THREE WEEKS PRIOR TO A PCTPA BOARD MEETING. FOR THE LATEST BOARD MEETING SCHEDULE, VISIT WWW.PCTPA.NET.

A completed claim package includes the following completed forms:
• TDA Compliance Checklist
• TDA Claim Worksheet (Excel file)
• STA Qualifying Criteria Worksheet (Excel file)
• Claim for Local Transportation Funds
• Claim for State Transit Assistance Funds
• Claim for State of Good Repair Program Funds
• TDA Annual Project and Financial Plan (see attached sample) Certified copy of resolution from the claimant's governing board approving the claim and its submittal to PCTPA. The resolution must include the amount claimed, the fiscal year for which funds are claimed, and the purpose for which the claim is made, identified by the article and section of the Act which authorizes such claims. See attached sample resolution.

If claiming Article 8c funds, copy of signed contract with whom claimant is contracting for transit service.

Only ONE copy of the claim form and PCTPA Board of Directors resolution will be returned to the claimant following approval.

Audit Policy
To help ensure that TDA audits are completed in a timely manner and the requirements of the TDA are met, the following policy was adopted by the PCTPA Board on March 22, 2006:

After approval of the Final TDA Apportionment, claimants who submit TDA claims will receive only 50% of the total approved Local Transportation Fund (LTF) claim if a completed TDA audit has not been received by PCTPA at the time of the claim.

The remaining 50% of approved LTF claim will be paid to the claimant upon receipt by PCTPA of the completed TDA audit. State Transit Assistance (STA) claims will be paid in full following approval of an STA claim, regardless of whether a completed TDA audit has been received.

Page 802 of 1881 ends

3 Revised September 2024

ANNUAL VERIFICATION OF TDA COMPLIANCE TO ACCOMPANY LTF AND STA CLAIMS

FOR TRANSIT / STREETS AND ROADS PURPOSES
PART I – ALL CLAIMANTS

1. Date annual TDA fiscal and compliance audit was approved by PCTPA Board:

Click or tap to enter a date.

2. Is the claimant's retirement system fully funded?
☐ YES
☒ NO

3. Is the claimant using the maximum Federal funds available for transit and/or streets/roads purposes?
☒ YES
☐ NO
PART II – TRANSIT CLAIMANTS

4. Date Transit Operator's Financial Transaction Report was submitted to State Controller's Office: Click or tap to enter a date. Attach copy of dated, signed cover sheet rom report.

5. Are public transit vehicles routinely staffed with one driver? ☒ YES
☐ NO (Explain) Click or tap here to enter text.

6. Has the proposed transit operating budget changed by more than 15% compared to the previous year?
☐ Yes (Explain) Click or tap here to enter text.
☒ NO

7. Did the transit operator meet its minimum farebox recovery requirement during the previous fiscal year? (requirement: 15% - Roseville; 12.94% - Placer County; 10% - Auburn)1
☒ YES
☐ NO (see below)
If the farebox recovery requirement was not met, then claimant must complete the following worksheet for the most recent fiscal year. 1Assembly Bill 90, 2019-20 [Reg. Session] temporarily prohibits the penalty for non-compliance with farebox recovery ratio requirement during FY 2019-20 and 2020-21. The claimant should still identify whether the requirement was met. AB 149 of 2021 extends the noncompliance relief through FY 2022/23, and AB 125 of 2023 further extended it through FY 2025/26.

Page 803 of 1881 ends

4 Revised September 2024
Transit Operating Expenses: enter text. +
Capital Purchases/Reserves: enter text. = LTF spent in most Subtotal: enter text. - recent fiscal year
Federal Revenues: enter text. = cannot exceed
STA Revenues: enter text. - result below.

Total: enter text. * 0.5= enter text.

8. Is there a prohibition on the employment of part-time drivers or on contracting with common carriers?
☐ YES
☒ NO (Explain) Click or tap here to enter text.

9. Are STA funds being used for transit operating purposes this fiscal year? ☒ YES (see below)
☐ NO
If STA funds are being used for transit operating purposes, indicate which efficiency standard was met. In calculating the operating cost, operators may exclude costs that exceed prior year costs, as adjusted by the CPI. Notes: (1) Use the STA Qualifying Criteria worksheet contained in the TDA Claim workbook to determine eligible exclusions. (2) These items may also be excluded when computing the farebox recovery ratio. (3) You may refer to operating cost figures from TDA fiscal audits for the applicable fiscal year.

Efficiency Standard #1: ☒ Yes ☐ No2
Efficiency Standard #2: ☒ Yes ☐ No2
If neither efficiency standard was met, list the percentage of STA Funding limited to:

Capital Expenditures: Enter %% Operating Expenditures: Enter %.%

10. Describe or attach current fare structure:

Please see the attached fare structure as outlined in the Roseville Transit Service Guides, overview on Roseville Transit’s website at
https://www.roseville.ca.us/cms/One.aspx?portalId=7964922&pageId=8756474

11. Attach copy of latest CHP terminal inspection report. ATTACHED

12. Each transit claimant must report on efforts to implement recommendations included in the FY 2018/19 through FY 2020/21 Triennial Performance Audit, which was completed in 2022 (attach additional pages as necessary).

Roseville has developed a standard policy for calculating FTE’s and we have been using that standard since the last Triennial Performance Audit.

Page 804 of 1881 ends

5 Revised September 2024
2Assembly Bill 90, 2019-20 [Reg. Session] temporarily prohibits the penalty for non-compliance with required STA efficiency standards during FY 2019-20 and 2020-21. The claimant should still identify whether the standards was met. AB 149 of 2021 extends the noncompliance relief through FY 2022/23, and AB 125 of 2023 further extended it through FY 2025/26.

Page 805 of 1881 ends

6 Revised September 2024

PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY

STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE

QUALIFYING CRITERIA WORKSHEET INSTRUCTIONS
Assembly Bill 90 of 2019-20 temporarily provides relief from non-compliance with STA Qualifying Criteria for FY 2019-20 and 2020-21 due to impact of COVID-19 on transit agencies. AB 149 of 2021 extended non-compliance relief through FY 2022/23, and AB 125 of 2023 further extended it through FY 2025/26.

The purpose of the STA Qualifying Criteria Worksheet is for the claimant to determine the proportion of STA funding eligible for operating and capital expenditures in the current fiscal year. Per STA regulations, one of two efficiency standards must be met for a claimant to utilize its full STA Allocation for operating purposes. The first efficiency standard evaluates whether the total operating cost per revenue vehicle hour increased at a rate greater than the prior year total operating cost per revenue vehicle hour as adjusted by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the State of California. The second efficiency standard evaluates whether the average total operating cost per revenue vehicle hour in the three latest years increased at a rate greater than the average of the preceding three years total operating cost per revenue vehicle hour as adjusted by CPI for the same period. Should neither efficiency standard be met, STA funding for operating expenditures will be reduced by the lowest percentage by which the claimant’s total operating cost per revenue vehicle hour exceeded the target for either standard. The remaining percentage will be limited for capital expenditures.

The STA Qualifying Criteria worksheet is a tab embedded within the TDA Claim Worksheet. The STA Qualifying Criteria worksheet simplifies the process of calculating the proportion of STA funding eligible for operating and capital expenditures. Please visit www.pctpa.net/TDA to download the file. The worksheet requires entry of the prior four years audited data for operating costs, allowable cost exemptions/exclusions under TDA, and revenue vehicle hours. Enter the appropriate numbers into Data Input Sections A, B, and D. DO NOT enter any numbers in the yellow highlighted boxes, as these boxes have been set up with formulas to automatically tabulate your claims. Cell O7 and O11 will indicate whether Efficiency Standard 1 or 2 are satisfied, respectively. Cell Q13 indicates the amount limited for capital expenditures while cell Q15 indicates the amount eligible for operating purposes.

This information should be input into question 9 of the Annual Verification Of TDA Compliance. The excel version of the qualifying criteria worksheet should be submitted with all other documents and forms when submitting a claim.

Page 806 of 1881 ends

7 Revised September 2024

CLAIM FOR LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS
TO: PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY
2260 DOUGLAS BLVD, SUITE 130; ROSEVILLE, CA 95661
FROM:

CLAIMANT: City of Roseville
ADDRESS: 316 Vernon St
Roseville, CA 95678
CONTACT PERSON: Ed Scofield
Phone:916-774-5449 Email:ECScofield @roseville.ca.us
The City of Roseville hereby requests, in accordance with the State of California Public Utilities Code, commencing with Section 99200 and the California Code of Regulations commencing with Section 6600, that this claim for Local Transportation Funds be approved for Fiscal Year 2024/25, in the following amounts for the following purposes to be drawn from the Local Transportation Fund deposited with the Placer County Treasurer:

P.U.C. 99260a, Article 4, Transit Operations: $ 1,578,935 P.U.C. 99260a, Article 4, Transit Capital: $Click or tap here to enter $ P.U.C. 99275, Article 4.5, Community Transit Services $Click or tap here to enter $ P.U.C. 99400a, Article 8a, Local Streets and Roads $9,226,955 P.U.C. 99402, Article 8a, Transportation Planning Process $59,547 P.U.C. 99400c, Article 8c, Contracted Transit Services: $Click or tap here to enter $ P.U.C. 99400e, Article 8e, Capital for Contracted Services: $Click or tap here to enter $ C.C.R. 6648, Capital Reserve: $Click or tap here to enter $ When approved, this claim will be transmitted to the Placer County Auditor for payment. Approval of the claim and payment by the County Auditor to the applicant is subject to such monies being available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved annual financial plan and budget. Claimant must submit a complete Fiscal and Compliance Audit for the prior fiscal year prior to issuance of instructions to the County Auditor to pay the claimant in full.

APPROVED: APPLICANT:

PLACER COUNTY

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY

BOARD OF DIRECTORS
BY: BY:
(signature) (signature)
TITLE: TITLE:

DATE: DATE:

Page 807 of 1881 ends

8 Revised September 2024

CLAIM FOR STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDS
TO: PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY
2260 DOUGLAS BLVD, SUITE 130; ROSEVILLE, CA 95661
FROM:

CLAIMANT: City of Roseville
ADDRESS: 316 Vernon St
Roseville, CA 95678
CONTACT PERSON: Ed Scofield
Phone:916-774-5449 Email:[email protected]
The City of Roseville hereby requests, in accordance with the State of California Public Utilities Code commencing with Section 99200 and the California Code of Regulations commencing with Section 6600, that this claim for State Transit Assistance be approved in the amount of $1,468,986 for Fiscal Year 2024/25 , in the following amounts for the following purposes to be drawn from the State Transit Assistance fund deposited with the Placer County Treasurer:

Transit Operations (6730a): $1,468,986
Transit Capital (6730a): $Click or tap here to enter $
Contracted Transit Services (6731b): $Click or tap here to enter $ Community Transit Services Provided by WPCTSA (6731.1): $Click or tap here to enter $ When approved, this claim will be transmitted to the Placer County Auditor for payment. Approval of the claim and payment by the County Auditor to the applicant is subject to such monies being available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved annual financial plan and budget.

APPROVED: APPLICANT:

PLACER COUNTY

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY

BOARD OF DIRECTORS
BY: BY:
(signature) (signature)
TITLE: TITLE:

DATE: DATE:

Page 808 of 1881 ends

9 Revised September 2024

CLAIM FOR STATE OF GOOD REPAIR PROGRAM FUNDS
TO: PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY
2260 DOUGLAS BLVD, SUITE 130; ROSEVILLE, CA 95661
FROM:

CLAIMANT: City of Roseville
ADDRESS: 316 Vernon St
Roseville, CA 95678
CONTACT PERSON: Ed Scofield
Phone:916-774-5449 Email:[email protected]
The City of Roseville hereby requests, in accordance with the State of California Public Utilities Code commencing with Section 99200 and the California Code of Regulations commencing with Section 6600, that this claim for State of Good Repair Funds be approved in the amount of $229,455 for Fiscal Year 2024/25, in the following amounts for the following purposes to be drawn from the State Transit Assistance fund deposited with the Placer County Treasurer.

Transit Capital (6730a): $229,455
When approved, this claim will be transmitted to the Placer County Auditor for payment. Approval of the claim and payment by the County Auditor to the applicant is subject to such monies being available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved annual financial plan and budget.

APPROVED: APPLICANT:

PLACER COUNTY

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY

BOARD OF DIRECTORS
BY: BY:
(signature) (signature)
TITLE: TITLE:

DATE: DATE:

Page 809 of 1881 ends

10 Revised September 2024

TDA ANNUAL PROJECT AND FINANCIAL PLAN
This form will show the planned expenditures of all TDA funds claimed for the fiscal year in addition to any TDA funds carried over from previous years. Briefly describe all operational, capital and/or streets and roads projects which will be funded by TDA moneys. Please show BOTH prior year TDA funds (if any) and current year TDA funds to be used, provide the total cost of each project, and indicate all other sources of funding associated with each project. For capital projects, the projects listed, and their associated costs and funding sources should be consistent with the budget developed in the TDA Claim Worksheet completed for the submittal of this claim. The total project cost and total funding source(s) listed below should balance for each project. See attached sample plan for additional guidance.

Claimant: City of Roseville
Fiscal Year: FY 2024/25
Brief Project Description Project Cost Source of Funding & Amount TRANSIT OPERATIONS Administration & Svcs. $8,722,331
Operating Reserve $1,500,000
OPERATING COSTS $10,222,331
Interest Earnings from FY24 $385,313
Passenger Fares $415,000
Federal Grants $1,496,350
State Grants $875,791
Local/Other Grants $391,662
LTF Article 4 FY25 $1,578,935
STA FY25 $1,469,986
CARRYOVER $3,610,295
OPERATIONAL REVENUE $10,222,331
TRANSIT CAPITAL PROJECTS Transit Capital Projects $3,433,322 Capital Reserve $1,000,000
CAPITAL COSTS $4,433,322
Carryover $4,203,867
FTA Capital Assistance $0
LTF Article 4 FY25 $0
SB1 SGR FY25 $229,455
CAPITAL REVENUE $4,433,322
STREETS AND ROADS TSM & Bikeway Program $2,840,555
Maintenance-Roadway $1,016,346
Construction $9,212,873
Other $433,762
Transp. Planning Process $59,547
Subtotal $13,563,083
Capital Reserve $1,000,000
STREETS & ROADS COSTS $14,563,083
Carryover $6,320,025
Interest Earnings from FY25 $86,123
LTF Article 8A FY25 $9,226,955
Transp. Planning Process $59,547
Federal Grants $0
FY24 Claim Unreleased $0
STREETS & ROAD REV. $15,637,725
EST. CARRYOVER FY25 $1,074,642

Page 810 of 1881 ends

11 Revised September 2024

PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY

LTF BICYCLE / PEDESTRIAN

CLAIM FORMS

BEFORE FILING THIS CLAIM, PLEASE CHECK WITH PCTPA STAFF TO ENSURE YOUR CLAIM IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CURRENT BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN 5-YEAR CASH MANAGEMENT PLAN, WHICH CAN BE FOUND AT WWW.PCTPA.NET/TDA.

TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT (TDA) CLAIM FORMS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO PCTPA A MINIMUM THREE WEEKS PRIOR TO A PCTPA BOARD MEETING. FOR THE LATEST BOARD MEETING SCHEDULE, VISIT WWW.PCTPA.NET.

A completed PED/BIKE claim package includes the following:
• Completed forms:
o Bicycle and Pedestrian Project Description and Financial Plan o Claim For LTF Bicycle and Pedestrian Funds
• Certified copy of resolution from the claimant's governing board approving the claim and its submittal to PCTPA. The resolution must include the specific dollar amount of LTF Bicycle/Pedestrian funds being requested. See attached sample resolution.

Only ONE original claim form and/or PCTPA Board of Directors resolution will be returned to the claimant following approval.

LTF Claims for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities
At the discretion of the Board, PCTPA typically allocates 2% of the LTF for bicycle and pedestrian facilities. PCTPA works with staff of the six cities/town and the County of Placer to develop a cash management plan with a five-year horizon. Allocations are made to each jurisdiction based on existing and projected future population.

Using the attached bicycle/pedestrian claim forms, jurisdictions may submit claims to PCTPA that are consistent with the five-year cash management plan. The claim form must be accompanied by a resolution from the claimant’s governing board approving the claim and its submittal to PCTPA.

Approval of the claim by the PCTPA Board then reserves the funds for that jurisdiction’s bicycle and pedestrian facility projects. As the jurisdiction expends funds in implementing the projects, it should submit invoices, accompanied with appropriate documentation, to PCTPA. PCTPA will then forward allocation instructions to the County Auditor’s office, which will reimburse the jurisdiction up to the maximum amount of the original claim. If a jurisdiction does not claim its allocation of bicycle and pedestrian funds within the five-year window of the cash management plan, the funds will revert to the LTF for apportionment.

Page 811 of 1881 ends

12 Revised September 2024

CLAIM FOR BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FUNDS
TO: PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY
2260 DOUGLAS BLVD, SUITE 130; ROSEVILLE, CA 95661
FROM:

CLAIMANT: Choose Agency
ADDRESS: Click or tap here to enter text.

Click or tap here to enter text.

CONTACT PERSON: Click or tap here to enter text.

Phone:Click or tap here to
enter text.

Email:Click or tap here to enter text.

The Choose Agency hereby requests, in accordance with the State of California Public Utilities Code, AS AMENDED (Chapter 3, Section 99234), that this claim for Bicycle and Pedestrian funds in the amount of $Click or tap here to enter $ be approved for Fiscal Year Choose FY , to be drawn from the Bicycle and Pedestrian Trust Fund.

When approved, this claim will be transmitted to the Placer County Auditor for funds to be reserved. Jurisdictions will receive payment as reimbursement of funds expended in implementing bicycle and pedestrian projects. Approval of the claim and payment by the County Auditor to the applicant is subject to such monies being available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved annual financial plan and budget.

APPROVED: APPLICANT:

PLACER COUNTY

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY

BOARD OF DIRECTORS
BY: BY:
(signature) (signature)
TITLE: TITLE:

DATE: DATE:

Page 812 of 1881 ends

13 Revised September 2024

BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND FINANCIAL PLAN Briefly describe the project for which you are applying for Bicycle / Pedestrian Funds. Also, identify all funding sources related to the project. The total project cost and total funding source(s) listed below should balance for each project.

Include a location map for the project as appropriate.

Claimant: Choose an item.

Fiscal Year: Choose an item.

Brief Project Description Project Cost Source of Funding & Amount

Page 813 of 1881 ends

14 Revised September 2024

SAMPLE RESOLUTION
In the matter of a Resolution approving and authorizing execution of the Fiscal Year 2024/2025 Local Transportation Fund, State Transit Assistance, and State of Good Repair Claims to the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency.

The following resolution was duly passed by the [name of governing board] of [name of claimant] at a regular meeting held [date of meeting], by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Signed and approved by me after its passage. Attest:
[Signature of chair of governing board] [Signature of governing board clerk] WHEREAS, the California Public Utilities Code commencing with Section 99200 and the California Code of Regulations commencing with Section 6600 authorizing local transportation funding available through the Local Transportation Fund and State Transit Assistance Fund established by the Transportation Development Act; and
WHEREAS, the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency is responsible for reviewing and approving annual transportation claims, and for making allocations from the Local Transportation Fund and State Transit Assistance Funds.

Be it hereby resolved by the [name of governing board] of [name of claimant] that the [chair of governing board or authorized staff person] is authorized and directed to execute the attached Fiscal Year 2024/25 Transportation Development Act Claim(s) to the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency, in the amount of:
$ [total LTF amount] of Local Transportation Funds for transit purposes as authorized by Article 4, commencing with Section 99260 of the California Public Utilities Code and Article 8 commencing with Section 99400(c).
$ [total LTF amount] of Local Transportation Funds for and for streets and roads purposes authorized by Article 8, commencing with Section 99400 and for the transportation planning process authorized by Article 8, commencing with section 99402. $ [total STA amount] of State Transit Assistance funds for transit operations, as authorized by Section 99313 and Section 99314 of the California Public Utilities Code, Chapter 4, Article 6.5 $ [total SGR amount] of State of Good Repair funds for transit capital, as authorized by the Caltrans SGR guidelines and complying with Public Resources Code§ 21100 and§ 21150.).

Page 814 of 1881 ends

15 Revised September 2024
$ [total LTF Bike/Ped amount] of Local Transportation Funds for bicycle and pedestrian purposes, as authorized by the California Public Utilities Code Section 99233.3, and by the California Code of Regulations Section 6655.2.

Be it further resolved that this claim is hereby approved by the [name of governing board].

Page 815 of 1881 ends

PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY

TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT CLAIM WORKSHEET
FISCAL YEAR: 2024/25
CITY/COUNTY OF: City of Roseville
Part 1 of 4

ESTIMATED PUBLIC TRANSIT REVENUES AND EXPENSES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023/24
I. FY 2023/24 AVAILABLE RESOURCES
A. Carryover from prior fiscal year (Unexpended prior year transit cash receipts held in claimants treasury as of June 30, 2023. From TDA Financial Audit Report) $ 8,359,702.00
B. Interest Earnings through June 30, 2023. $ (75,336.00) C. Federal Grants & Reimbursements received in 2023/24:

1. FTA Planning Assistance $ -

2. FTA Operating Assistance $ -

3. FTA Capital Assistance $ 1,504,369.65

4. Other (list) __COVID-19/ARPA/CARES________________________ $ 161,481.00 D. State Grants (Source/Amount):

1. LCTOP- ZEB Replacement, ZEB Depot, Galleria Electric Charging Infrastructure $ 891,481.00

2. SCCP- ZEB Replacement, ZEB Depot $ 421,688.06

3. Caltrans- Roseville Transit Comprehensive Operational Analysis $ 130,361.12 E. Local Cash Grants:

1. LTF-Operations (PUC 99260a; Article 4) $ 2,484,854.50

2. LTF-Capital (PUC 99260a; Article 4) $ 2,024,350.50

3. LTF-Community Transit Services(PUC 99275; Article 4.5) $ -

4. LTF-Contracted Transit Service (PUC 99400c; Article 8c) $ -

5. LTF-Capital Reserve Contribution (CCR 6648) $ -

6. LTF-Capital expenses for contracted transit services (PUC 99400e; Article 8e) $ -

7. STAF-Operations (CCR 6730a) $ 1,532,812.00

8. STAF-Capital (CCR 6730b) $ -

9. STAF-Community Transit Services (CCR 6730d; <CTSA>) $ -

10. STAF-Contracted Service (CCR 6731b) $ -

11. SGR-Capital (CCR 6730b) $ 208,665.00
F. Other Grants:

1. PCAPCD- ZEB Depot $ 36,610.15

2. SPRTA- South Placer Capital $ 441,881.20
F. Operating Revenues:

Page 816 of 1881 ends

1. Passenger Fares $ 518,454.39

2. Charters $ -

3. Other (list) __________________________ $ -
G. Other Revenues

1. Other Revenues $ 404,878.00

2. Interest Revenue $ -
H. TOTAL FY 2023/24 AVAILABLE RESOURCES
(A+B+C+D+E+F+G) $ 19,046,252.57

Page 817 of 1881 ends

II. FY 2023/24 PROJECTED EXPENSES & USES
I. Personnel

1. Administrative Salaries and Wages $ 553,164.00

2. Operating Salaries and Wages $ -

3. Other Salaries and Wages $ -

4. Fringe Benefits $ 304,200.00
J. Services and Supplies

1. Professional Services $ 61,850.00

2. Maintenance Services $ 1,090,295.00

3. Other Services $ (16,607.00)

4. Vehicle Materials & Supplies $ 689,320.00

5. Utilities $ 2,028.00

6. Insurance $ 69,757.00

7. Purchased Transit Services $ 3,703,125.00

8. Facility Services/System Repair & Maintenance $ 64,841.00

9. IT Services $ 125,414.00

10. Other Materials and Supplies $ 54,243.00

11. Indirect Costs & Other Costs Reimbursed $ 274,041.00

12. Miscellaneous $ -

13. Interest $ -

14. Leases & Rentals $ -

15. Transfers Out - Transit Shuttle Fee $ 188,000.00
K. Capital Assets (Itemize)

1. Taylor Rd Commuter Bus Stop $ 124,130.14

2. Commuter Bus Replacement $ 862,496.74

3. ZEB Depot Phase I $ 663,890.48

4. Downtown Space Utilization $ 15,208.89

5. Roseville Transit Comprehensive Operational Analysis $ 147,250.78

7. South Placer County Express Bus Service - Capital $ 1,272,753.07

8. ZEB Depot Phase II $ 928,477.94

9. PW-AT Workforce Development $ 9,094.02

10. Signal Pre-Emptions for Transit Services $ 45,117.75 L. Other Uses:

1. Capital Outlay Reserve Contribution (CCR 6648) $ -
M. TOTAL FY 2023/24 EXPENSES & USES (I+J+K+L) $ 11,232,090.81 N. Estimated Deferred Revenue as of June 30, 2023 (H-M) $ 7,814,161.76

Page 818 of 1881 ends
Page 819 of 1881 ends

Part 2 of 4
BUDGETED PUBLIC TRANSIT REVENUES & EXPENSES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024/25 I. FY 2024/25 NON-TDA BUDGETED RESOURCES & DEFERRED REVENUE A. Carryover from prior fiscal year (Unexpended prior year transit cash receipts held in claimants treasury as of June 30, 2024-- From Part 1, line N) $ 7,814,161.76 B. Interest earnings through June 30, 2024 $ 385,313.04 C. Federal Grants (Source/Amount)

1. FTA Planning Assistance $ -

2. FTA Operating Assistance $ -

3. FTA Capital Assistance $ -

4. Other (list) _CRRSSA/ARPA/CARES____ 1,496,349.56
D. State Grants (Source/Amount):

1. LCTOP - ZEB Replacement, ZEB Depot, Galleria Electric Charging Infrastructure $ 454,102.93

2. Solutions for Congested Corridors (SCCP) - PSGC I South Placer Transit $ 421,688.06
E. Local Non-TDA Cash Grants:

1. PCAPCD - ZEB Depot $ 89,503.38

2. SPRTA - $ 101,927.25
F. Operating Revenues:

1. Passenger Fares $ 415,000.00

2. Charters $ -

3. Other (list) _Auxiliary Transportation Revenue___ $ - G. Other Revenues

1. Non-Transportation Revenue $ 200,231.00

2. Revenue Pending Receipt After Audit Completion
H. TOTAL FY 2024/25 CARRYOVER & NON-TDA BUDGETED
RESOURCES (A+B+C+D+E+F+G) $ 11,378,276.98

Page 820 of 1881 ends

I. TOTAL FY 2024/25 CARRYOVER & NON-TDA BUDGETED
RESOURCES (From Line H) $ 11,378,276.98
II. FY 2024/25 PROJECTED EXPENSES & USES
J. Personnel:

1. Administrative Salaries and Wages $ 566,069.00

2. Operating Salaries and Wages $ -

3. Other Salaries and Wages $ -

4. Fringe Benefits $ 352,142.00
K. Services and Supplies:

1. Professional Services $ 158,422.00

2. Maintenance Services $ 1,280,798.00

3. Other Services $ (12,500.00)

4. Vehicle Materials & Supplies $ 741,636.00

5. Utilities $ 5,340.00

6. Insurance $ 122,022.00

7. Purchased Transit Services $ 4,585,773.00

8. Facility Services / System Repair & Maintenance $ 302,234.00

9. IT Services $ 131,011.00

10. Other Materials and Supplies $ 169,780.00

11. Indirect Costs & Other Costs Reimbursed $ -

12. Miscellaneous, Cash Over/Short, Uncollectible, Other Fees $ 319,604.00

13. Interest $ -

14. Leases & Rentals $ -
L. Capital Assets (Itemize):

1. Taylor Rd Commuter Bus Stop $ 117,256.00

2. Commuter Bus Replacement $ 18,878.00

3. On Board Bus Technology $ 150,000.00

4. Microtransit Vehicle and Charger Purchase $ 66,196.00

5. Zero Emission Bus Depot Project $ 471,341.00

6. Downtown Space Utilization and Feasibility Study $ 15,209.00

7. Roseville Transit Comprehensive Operational Analysis $ 126,315.00

8. South Placer County Express Bus Service - Capital $ 413,270.00

9. ZEB Depot Phase II $ 1,949,174.00

10. PW-AT Workforce Development $ 105,683.00
M. Other Uses:

1. Capital Outlay Reserve Contribution.(CCR 6648) $ -

2. Operational & Capital Reserve $ 2,500,000.00

Page 821 of 1881 ends

N. TOTAL FY 2024/25 EXPENSES & USES (J+K+L+M) $ 14,655,653.00 O. Unfunded Balance (I - N) $ (3,277,376.02)

Page 822 of 1881 ends

O. Unfunded Balance (I - N) $ (3,277,376.02)
III. FY 2024/25 TDA TRANSIT CLAIMS
P. FY 2023/24 LTF TRANSIT CLAIMS:

1. LTF-Operations (PUC 99260a; Article 4) $ 1,578,935.02

2. LTF-Capital (PUC 99260a; Article 4) $ -

3. LTF-Community Transit Services (PUC 99275; Article 4.5) $ -

4. LTF-Contracted Transit Service (PUC 99400c: Article 8c) $ -

5. LTF-Capital Reserve Contribution (CCR 6648) $ -

6. LTF-Capital for contracted transit service
(PUC 99400e; Article 8e) $ -

7. TOTAL LTF CLAIM (P1+P2+P3+P4+P5) $ 1,578,935.02
Q. FY 2023/24 STAF CLAIMS:

1. STAF-Operations (CCR 6730a) $ 1,468,986.00

2. STAF-Capital (CCR 6730b) $ -

3. STAF-Community Transit Services (CCR 6730d) / CTSA $ -

4. STAF-Contracted Service (CCR 6731b) $ -

5. TOTAL STAF CLAIM (Q1+Q2+Q3+Q4) $ 1,468,986.00
R. FY 2023/24 SGR CLAIMS:

1. SGR-Capital (CCR 6730b) $ 229,455.00

2. TOTAL SGR CLAIM (R1) $ 229,455.00
S. TOTAL 2024/25 TRANSIT CLAIMS (P6 + Q5 + R2) $ 3,277,376.02

Page 823 of 1881 ends

Part 3 of 4

ESTIMATED STREETS AND ROADS TDA EXPENDITURES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023/24
I. FY 2023/24 AVAILABLE TDA STREET AND ROAD RESOURCES
A. Carryover from prior fiscal year (Actual Unexpended Prior Year TDA Streets And Roads Cash Receipts Held in Claimant's Treasury as of June 30, 2023. From TDA Fiscal Audits) $ 5,456,746.00
B. FY 2023/24 TDA Cash Receipts from LTF trust fund for streets and roads purposes (PUC 99400a). $ 6,765,847.00
C. Interest Earned on claimant TDA streets and roads cash balances through June 30, 2024. $ 90,745.00
D. Total FY 2023/24 Available TDA Street and Road Resources. (A+B+C) $ 12,313,338.00 II. FY 2023/24 TDA STREET AND ROAD EXPENDITURES
E. Administration and Engineering $ 1,846,665.89
F. Maintenance $ 476,153.60
G. Construction 3,428,283.63
H. Equipment $ 31,165.00
I. Other $ 211,045.00
J. TOTAL FY 2023/24 EXPENDITURES (E+F+G+H+I) $ 5,993,313.12 K. Estimated Carryover of TDA Street and Road Revenues at June 30, 2024 (D-J) $ 6,320,024.88

Page 824 of 1881 ends

Part 4 of 4
STREETS AND ROADS TDA BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024/25
I. FY 2024/25 AVAILABLE TDA STREET AND ROAD RESOURCES
A. Carryover as of June 30, 2024 (From Part 3, Line K.) $ 6,320,024.88 B. 2024/25 TDA Funds Available For Streets And Roads

1. FY 2024/25 LTF Total Apportionment (From PCTPA) $ 10,865,437.00

2. FY 2024/25 LTF Transit Claim (From Part 2, Line P6) $ 1,578,935.02

3. Balance of 2024/25 LTF Apportionment (B1-B2) $ 9,286,501.98

4. FY 2023/24 LTF Apportionment To be Claimed for Streets and Roads Purposes Pursuant to PUC 99400a. (Can Not Exceed Line B3) $ 9,226,954.98
C. FY 2023/24 Estimated Interest Earned on TDA Cash Balances through June 30, 2025. 86,123.00
D. Total Estimated FY 2023/24 Available TDA Resources. (A+B4+C) $ 15,637,724.86 II. FY 2024/25 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
H. Administration and Engineering $ 2,840,555.00
I. Maintenance $ 1,016,346.00
J. Construction $ 9,212,873.00
K. Equipment $ -
L. Transportation Planning Process (P.U.C. 99402) $ 59,547.00 M. Other- Indirect Costs $ 433,762.00
N. Capital Reserves $ 1,000,000.00
O. Total FY 2023/24 Estimated Expenditures (H+I+J+K+L+M) $ 14,563,083.00 P. Estimated Carryover as of June 31, 2025 (D-N) $ 1,074,641.86

Page 825 of 1881 ends

Placer County Transportation Planning Agency
STA Qualifying Criteria Worksheet (PUC 99314.6)
FY 2023/24
Qualifying Criteria (Highlighted Cells Automatically Calculated) Recent FY 21/22 Op.

Cost/Rev. Veh. Hr.

Prior FY 2020/21 Op.

Cost/Rev. Veh. Hr.

Change in
CPI
Allowable
Increase
Standard
Met?
% Difference
between Actual
and Target
A. Efficiency Standard 1 - Total Operating Cost/Revenue Vehicle Hour cannot exceed sum of prior year Total
Operating Cost/Revenue Vehicle Hour and an amount equal to the product of the percentage change in CPI, multiplied by the preceding year's Total Operating Cost/Revenue Vehicle Hour.(1)
$102.37 $86.04 7.49% $92.48 No 11%
Recent Three FY 2019/20-
2021/22 Average Op.

Cost/Rev. Veh. Hr.

Prior Three FY 2018/19-
2020/21 Average Op.

Cost/Rev. Veh. Hr.

Change in
CPI for Prior
Three Years
Allowable
Increase
Standard
Met?
% Difference
between Actual
and Target
B. Efficiency Standard 2 - Average Total Operating
Cost/Revenue Vehicle Hour in the latest three years cannot exceed the sum of the Average of the Total Operating
Cost/Revenue Vehicle Hour in the three years preceding the latest year and an amount equal to the product of the
average percentage change in CPI for the same period
multiplied by the Average Total Operating Cost/Revenue
Vehicle Hour in the same three years.(2)
$95.59 $88.19 4.67% $92.31 No 4%
C. If neither Efficiency Standard A or B are met, the lowest percentage by which the Total Operating Cost/Revenue
Vehicle Hour Exceeded the target Amount. This portion shall be used only for capital purposes.(3)
4%
D. The inverse of C shall be allowed for operating purposes. 96% Note: (1) PUC Section 99314.6(a)(1)(A) as amended into the Transportation Development Act by SB 508 of 2015. (2) PUC Section 99314.6(a)(1)(B) as amended into the Transportation Development Act by SB 508 of 2015. (3) PUC Section 99314.6(a)(2) as amended into the Transportation Development Act by SB 508 of 2015.

Data Input (Do not input data into shaded cells)
Fiscal Year 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22
A. Total Systemwide Operating Costs (4) $376,875 $463,106 $410,916 $493,231 B. TDA Allowed Exemptions/Exclusions(5)

1. Complementary Paratransit Services Costs which exceed prior year's costs adjusted for the CPI (PUC 99268.17)(7)
2A. Fuel costs which exceed prior year's costs adjusted for the CPI (PUC 99268.17)
2B. Alternative fuel programs costs which exceed prior year's costs adjusted for the CPI (PUC 99268.17)
2C. Power, including electricity costs which exceed prior year's costs adjusted for the CPI (PUC 99268.17)

Page 826 of 1881 ends

2D. Insurance premiums and payments in settlement of claims arising out of the operator’s liability which exceed prior year's costs adjusted for the CPI (PUC 99268.17)
2E. State and federal mandates which exceed prior year's costs adjusted for the CPI (PUC 99268.17)

3. Startup costs for new services for a period of not more than two years.

4. Costs required to operate demand-response and microtransit services that expand access to transit service beyond fixed route corridors.(7)

5. Costs of funding or improving payment and ticketing systems and services.(7)

6. Costs of security and public safety contracts.(7)

7. Any expense greater than the actuarially determined contribution associated with pensions and other OPEB required by GABS #68 and 75.(7)

8. Costs of planning for improvements in transit operations, integration with other operators and agencies, transition to zeroemission operations.(7) Depreciation (PUC 99246)
Charter Service Costs (PUC 99246)
Vehicle Lease Costs (PUC 99246)
Principal and interest payments on capital projects funded with certificates of participation (PUC 99247)
Cost of "Extension of Services" (PUC 99268.8, 6619.1, 6633.8) Ridesharing Services Costs (PUC 99268.16)
C. Adjusted Operating Costs $376,875 $463,106 $410,916 $493,231 D. Revenue Vehicle Hours 4,700 4,709 4,776 4,818
E. Operating Cost per Revenue Vehicle Hour $80.19 $98.34 $86.04 $102.37 F. Annual Percent Increase in Operating Cost per Revenue Vehicle Hour N/A 23% -13% 19%
G. Consumer Price Index Value (CPI) for the State of California(6) 281.247 286.388 299.815 322.275 H. Annual Percent Change in Consumer Price Index for the State of California N/A 1.83% 4.69% 7.49%
I. Three-year Average Percent Change in Consumer Price Index for the State of California 4.67%
Note:
(4) Refer to Annual TDA Financial Audit Report
(5) Refer to Annual TDA Financial Audit Report and/or actual TDA PUC reference to determine if exclusion applies. Updated per AB-149, July 16, 2021. (6) CPI data from California Department of Industrial Relations, which uses the United State Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics Data.

The August Statewide CPI index for all Urban Consumers is used per PUC Section 99314.6 (b)(3). Data source link https://www.dir.ca.gov/OPRL/CAPriceIndex.htm (7) Definitions updated per AB-149, July 16, 2021.

Page 827 of 1881 ends

City of Auburn
City of Colfax
City of Lincoln
City of Rocklin
City of Roseville
County of Placer
Town of Loomis
WPCTSA

Page 828 of 1881 ends

For Use with Claim Financial Plan to determine Carrover Split bet Op and Cap & to validate Cost and Sources balance For Use with Claim Financial Plan to determine Carrover Split bet Op and Cap & to validate Cost and Sources balance.

FY23/24 FY24/25
TRANSIT CARRYOVER $ 8,359,702 OP SOURCE OF FUNDS In Claim OPS COSTS FY23/24 Interest Earnings thru June 30, 2023 $ (75,336) OPERATING COSTS In Claim OPERATING SOURCES OF FUNDS In Claim Admin Wages $ 553,164 Passenger Fares $ 518,454 Admin & Services $ 8,722,331 Interest thru June 30, 2024 $ 385,313 Fringe $ 304,200 Advertising/Other $ 404,878 Passenger Fares FY24 $ 415,000 Prof Svcs $ 61,850 Fed Grants $ 1,665,851 Operating Reserve $ 1,500,000 Federal Grants $ 1,496,350 Maint Svcs $ 1,090,295 State Gramts $ 1,443,530 State Grants $ 875,791 Services and Supplies $ 4,880,121 Local/Other Grants $ 6,729,173 Local/Other Grants $ 391,662 Indirect Costs & Other Reimb. $ 274,041 LTF Article 4 FY24 $ - OPERATING COSTS $ 10,222,331 LTF FY25 $ 1,578,935 SUBTOTAL $ 10,686,551 STA FY25 1,468,986
Carryover $ 8,359,702 CAPITAL COSTS In Claim
Transit Capital Projects $ 3,433,322 SUBTOTAL $ 6,612,036 OPERATIONAL COSTS $ 7,163,671 FY23/24 Available Resources $ 19,046,253 Carryover $ 3,610,295 Capital Reserve $ 1,000,000 OPERATING REVENUE $ 10,222,331 CAPITAL COSTS FY23/24 Costs $ 11,232,091
Transit Capital Projects $ 4,068,420
FY23/24 Carryover $ 7,814,162
CAPITAL COSTS $ 4,433,322.00 CAPITAL SOURCE OF FUNDS In Claim FTA Capital Assistance $ -
TOTAL EXPENSES IN CLAIM LTF FY24 $ -
$ 14,655,653.00 SGR FY25 $ 229,455
SUBTOTAL $ 229,455
Carryover $ 4,203,867
CAPITAL REVENUE $ 4,433,322.00

TOTAL USES IN CLAIM
$ 14,655,653
FY25 Carryover $ -

Page 829 of 1881 ends

For Use with Claim Financial Plan to determine Carrover Split bet Op and Cap & to validate Cost and Sources balance.

FY24/25

STREETS & ROADS
FY23/24 Carryover Total $ 5,456,746
FY2024/25 Estimated Expenditures SOURCE OF FUNDS
Administration & Engineering $ 2,840,555 Carryover as of 6/30/2024 $ 6,320,025 $ 9,226,955 LTF 8a Transp Maintenance/Materials/Supplies $ 1,016,346 LTF Article 8A FY25 $ 9,226,955 $ 59,547 LTF 8a Transp Planning Construction $ 9,212,873 LTF Transportation Planning Process Article 8A FY25 $ 59,547 $ 1,578,935 LTF 4 - Op Equipment Interest FY2024 through 6/30/25 $ 90,745 $ - LTF 4 - Cap Other - Indirect Costs $ 433,762 Federal Grants $ 10,865,437 LTF Transportation Planning Support $ 59,547 State Grants $ - $ 1,468,986 STA Other Revenue $ 229,455 SGR
Subtotal $ 15,697,272 $ 12,563,878 TOTAL CLAIM
Subtotal $ 13,563,083
FY2024 Unreleased held by PCTPA
Capital Reserves $ 1,000,000
TOTAL Streets & Roads Resources $ 15,697,272 $ 5,286,292.50 Total FY 24/25 Estimated Expenditures $ 14,563,083
Less Costs $ (14,563,083)
Est. Carryover as of June 31, 2025 $ 1,074,642
$ 15,697,271.86 FY24 Carryover and FY25 LTF S&R Claim Rev $ 14,563,083.00 FY2025 expenses
$ 1,134,188.86 balance
$ - amount to release from FY 24
$ 15,697,271.86 Total FY24 revenue available
$ - FY 23 Amount unreleased
FY 23 Amount unreleased
$ - Total unreleased

Page 830 of 1881 ends

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 6/18/2025
Item #: VII.16
File #: 0721
Item ID: 2025-287
Title: Fiscal Year 2024-25 Transportation Development Act, Bicycle and Pedestrian Claim Contact: Ed Scofield 916-774-5449 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a Fiscal Year (FY) 2024-25 Transportation Development Act Bicycle and Pedestrian claim in the amount of $841,644 for the Dry Creek Greenway East Phase 2 bike trail and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute the claim on behalf of the City.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the Fiscal Year (FY) 2024-25 Transportation Development Act (TDA) Bicycle and Pedestrian claim in the amount of $841,644 for the Dry Creek Greenway East Phase 2 bike trail and authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute the claim on behalf of the City.

BACKGROUND
Per TDA Guidelines, Placer County Transportation Planning Agency (PCTPA) allocates up to 2% of the annual Local Transportation Fund (LTF) apportionment for bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Of that 2%, 75% is allocated to local agencies on a formula basis, while 25% is put into a discretionary fund. For the FY2021-2025 funding cycle, Roseville was allocated $919,573 from a combination of the Bicycle & Pedestrian formula and discretionary funds. In 2022, Roseville spent $159,040 of this funding on the Maidu Park Trail Rehabilitation Project. Staff is proposing to use the remaining amount of $760,533 on the Dry Creek Greenway East Phase 2 project. Additionally, Roseville is claiming the City of Colfax’s apportioned $81,111 in bike/ped funds this fiscal year, and will then reduce Roseville's LTF apportionment for FY 25/26 by the same amount, and give it to Colfax. These funds will also go towards the Dry Creek Greenway East Phase 2 project. This will make the current claim a total of $841,644.

The Dry Creek Greenway East Phase 2 bike trail is an extension of the Phase 1 project that is scheduled to open in early 2026. Phase 2 of the trail runs approximately 1.5 miles from Rocky Ridge Drive to Old Auburn Road in Roseville. The overall Dry Creek East trail is a paved multi-use trail along Dry, Cirby and Linda creeks from Darling Way/Riverside Avenue to the City limits at South Cirby Way/Old Auburn Road and is scheduled to be built in three phases.

In March 2019, the City Council approved the entire Dry Creek Greenway East trail project, including all phases. This approval included the certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and approval of the proposed project described in the EIR.

FISCAL IMPACT
The overall budget of this project has previously been approved by the Council. This action will replace $841,644 of previously budgeted regular LTF funds with these bicycle/pedestrian LTF dollars. Council approval and the attached claim form are required to receive these funds. This item does not impact the

Page 831 of 1881 ends

General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378.

Approval of the claim meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community

2. Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world

4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Ed Scofield, Alternative Transportation Planner
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 25-196

2. FY 21-25 Bike-Ped Cash Flow Plan

3. TDA BikePed Claim Forms FY 2024-25 Filled
REVIEWERS:

Ed Scofield, Public Works Department - Transportation Created/Initiated - 5/15/2025 Ed Scofield, Public Works Department - Transportation Approved - 5/15/2025 Jason Shykowski, Public Works Department - All Approved - 5/21/2025 Gretchen Hakala, City Attorney Department Approved - 5/27/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 6/2/2025
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/3/2025 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/4/2025 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 6/6/2025 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 6/6/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 6/6/2025

Page 832 of 1881 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 25-196
APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF THE FY2024-25

TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT, BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FUND CLAIM

TO THE PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY
WHEREAS, the California Public Utilities Code, commencing with Section 99200, and Title 21 of the California Code of Regulations, commencing with Section 6600, authorize local transportation funding available through the Local Transportation Fund and State Transit Assistance Fund established by the Transportation Development Act; and WHEREAS, the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency is responsible for reviewing and approving annual transportation claims, and for making allocations from the Local Transportation Fund and State Transit Assistance Funds; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Roseville hereby authorizes and directs the City Manager or his designee to execute the FY2024-25 Transportation Development Act, Bicycle and Pedestrian Fund Claim in the amount of $841,644 to the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of __________________________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
___________________________
City Clerk

Page 833 of 1881 ends

FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 Total Claims Discretionary Al 5-Year ApportionmTotal ApportionmeUnclaimed AUBURN $ - $ 74,769 $ 74,769 $ 74,769
COLFAX $ - $ 70,000 $ 11,111 $ 81,111 $ 81,111
LINCOLN $ 144,031 $ 144,031 $ 54,000 $ 259,265 $ 313,265 $ 169,234 LOOMIS* $ 107,585 $ 107,585 $ 71,900 $ 35,685 $ 107,585 $ - ROCKLIN $ 70,000 $ 286,000 $ 90,248 $ 446,248 $ 77,462 $ 368,786 $ 446,248 $ - ROSEVILLE $ 159,040 $ 159,040 $ 159,000 $ 760,573 $ 919,573 $ 760,533 PLACER COUNTY $ 545,216 $ 545,216 $ 545,216 $ 545,216 $ - PCTPA $ 194,500 $ 194,500 $ 194,500 $ 194,500 $ -
$ 1,596,620 $ 626,862 $ 2,055,405 $ 2,682,267 $ 1,085,647 Note that Loomis claimed $139,400, but that included some previously claimed carry over from previous cash flow plan (FY 16/17-19/20)

Page 834 of 1881 ends

Transportation Development Act
Claim Forms

Page 835 of 1881 ends

10 Revised September 2024

PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY

LTF BICYCLE / PEDESTRIAN

CLAIM FORMS

BEFORE FILING THIS CLAIM, PLEASE CHECK WITH PCTPA STAFF TO ENSURE YOUR CLAIM IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CURRENT BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN 5-YEAR CASH MANAGEMENT PLAN, WHICH CAN BE FOUND AT WWW.PCTPA.NET/TDA.

TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT (TDA) CLAIM FORMS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO PCTPA A MINIMUM THREE WEEKS PRIOR TO A PCTPA BOARD MEETING. FOR THE LATEST BOARD MEETING SCHEDULE, VISIT WWW.PCTPA.NET.

A completed PED/BIKE claim package includes the following:
• Completed forms:
o Bicycle and Pedestrian Project Description and Financial Plan o Claim For LTF Bicycle and Pedestrian Funds
• Certified copy of resolution from the claimant's governing board approving the claim and its submittal to PCTPA. The resolution must include the specific dollar amount of LTF Bicycle/Pedestrian funds being requested. See attached sample resolution.

Only ONE original claim form and/or PCTPA Board of Directors resolution will be returned to the claimant following approval.

LTF Claims for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities
At the discretion of the Board, PCTPA typically allocates 2% of the LTF for bicycle and pedestrian facilities. PCTPA works with staff of the six cities/town and the County of Placer to develop a cash management plan with a five-year horizon. Allocations are made to each jurisdiction based on existing and projected future population.

Using the attached bicycle/pedestrian claim forms, jurisdictions may submit claims to PCTPA that are consistent with the five-year cash management plan. The claim form must be accompanied by a resolution from the claimant’s governing board approving the claim and its submittal to PCTPA.

Approval of the claim by the PCTPA Board then reserves the funds for that jurisdiction’s bicycle and pedestrian facility projects. As the jurisdiction expends funds in implementing the projects, it should submit invoices, accompanied with appropriate documentation, to PCTPA. PCTPA will then forward allocation instructions to the County Auditor’s office, which will reimburse the jurisdiction up to the maximum amount of the original claim. If a jurisdiction does not claim its allocation of bicycle and pedestrian funds within the five-year window of the cash management plan, the funds will revert to the LTF for apportionment.

Page 836 of 1881 ends

11 Revised September 2024

CLAIM FOR BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FUNDS
TO: PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY
2260 DOUGLAS BLVD, SUITE 130; ROSEVILLE, CA 95661
FROM:

CLAIMANT: City of Roseville
ADDRESS: 316 Vernon Street, Suite 150
Roseville, CA 95678
CONTACT PERSON: Ed Scofield
Phone:(916) 774-5449 Email:[email protected]
The City of Roseville hereby requests, in accordance with the State of California Public Utilities Code, AS AMENDED (Chapter 3, Section 99234), that this claim for Bicycle and Pedestrian funds in the amount of $841,644 be approved for Fiscal Year 2024/25 , to be drawn from the Bicycle and Pedestrian
Trust Fund.

When approved, this claim will be transmitted to the Placer County Auditor for funds to be reserved. Jurisdictions will receive payment as reimbursement of funds expended in implementing bicycle and pedestrian projects. Approval of the claim and payment by the County Auditor to the applicant is subject to such monies being available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved annual financial plan and budget.

APPROVED: APPLICANT:

PLACER COUNTY

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY

BOARD OF DIRECTORS
BY: BY:
(signature) (signature)
TITLE: TITLE:

DATE: DATE:

Page 837 of 1881 ends

12 Revised September 2024

BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND FINANCIAL PLAN Briefly describe the project for which you are applying for Bicycle / Pedestrian Funds. Also, identify all funding sources related to the project. The total project cost and total funding source(s) listed below should balance for each project.

Include a location map for the project as appropriate.

Claimant: City of Roseville
Fiscal Year: FY 2024/25
Brief Project Description Project Cost Source of Funding & Amount Dry Creek Greenway Bike Trail Phase 2
will construct approximately 1.5 miles
of Class I bikeways that will facilitate
regional trail connections to the
American River Parkway, Sacramento
Northern, and Miners Ravine Trails
$9,301,725 LTF Bicycle & Pedestrian Trust Fund
FY 21-25 5-year Apportionment -
$841,644
Local Transportation Funds -
$2,387,081
State Other- Active Transportation
Program- $6,063,000
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality-
$10,000

Page 838 of 1881 ends

13 Revised September 2024

SAMPLE RESOLUTION
In the matter of a Resolution approving and authorizing execution of the Fiscal Year 2024/2025 Local Transportation Fund, State Transit Assistance, and State of Good Repair Claims to the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency.

The following resolution was duly passed by the [name of governing board] of [name of claimant] at a regular meeting held [date of meeting], by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Signed and approved by me after its passage. Attest:
[Signature of chair of governing board] [Signature of governing board clerk] WHEREAS, the California Public Utilities Code commencing with Section 99200 and the California Code of Regulations commencing with Section 6600 authorizing local transportation funding available through the Local Transportation Fund and State Transit Assistance Fund established by the Transportation Development Act; and
WHEREAS, the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency is responsible for reviewing and approving annual transportation claims, and for making allocations from the Local Transportation Fund and State Transit Assistance Funds.

Be it hereby resolved by the [name of governing board] of [name of claimant] that the [chair of governing board or authorized staff person] is authorized and directed to execute the attached Fiscal Year 2024/25 Transportation Development Act Claim(s) to the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency, in the amount of:
$ [total LTF amount] of Local Transportation Funds for transit purposes as authorized by Article 4, commencing with Section 99260 of the California Public Utilities Code and Article 8 commencing with Section 99400(c).
$ [total LTF amount] of Local Transportation Funds for and for streets and roads purposes authorized by Article 8, commencing with Section 99400 and for the transportation planning process authorized by Article 8, commencing with section 99402. $ [total STA amount] of State Transit Assistance funds for transit operations, as authorized by Section 99313 and Section 99314 of the California Public Utilities Code, Chapter 4, Article 6.5 $ [total SGR amount] of State of Good Repair funds for transit capital, as authorized by the Caltrans SGR guidelines and complying with Public Resources Code§ 21100 and§ 21150.).

Page 839 of 1881 ends

14 Revised September 2024
$ [total LTF Bike/Ped amount] of Local Transportation Funds for bicycle and pedestrian purposes, as authorized by the California Public Utilities Code Section 99233.3, and by the California Code of Regulations Section 6655.2.

Be it further resolved that this claim is hereby approved by the [name of governing board].

Page 840 of 1881 ends

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 6/18/2025
Item #: VII.17
File #: 0721
Item ID: 2025-294
Title: Fareless Student Transit Pass Program - Reimbursement Agreement Contact: Ed Scofield 916-774-5449 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a reimbursement agreement with the Sierra Joint Community College District for Roseville Transit to receive partial reimbursement for providing free fares to Sierra College students for three years through June 30, 2028.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a reimbursement agreement with the Sierra Joint Community College District for Roseville Transit to receive partial reimbursement for providing free fares to Sierra College students for three years through June 30, 2028.

BACKGROUND
In 2021, staff began discussions with the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency (PCTPA), Placer County Transit (PCT), Auburn Transit and Sierra College to establish a free fare program for Sierra College students. Following these discussions, a Sierra College free fare plan was developed in which Sierra College reimbursed Roseville Transit, PCT and Auburn Transit 50% of the cost of lost fare revenue for providing free boardings to Sierra College students on Roseville's fixed route service. Arrow ondemand service was not part of the current agreement. The agreed-upon reimbursement rate for Roseville is currently $.73 per ride. For the three-year period to date, Roseville Transit has issued 25,900 free rides.

Program ridership by year is as follows:

1. 2022/2023 - 5,015 Rides

2. 2023/2024 - 8,954 Rides

3. 2024/2025 - 11,931 Rides*
*Note: 2024/2025 free ride total is through the month of April. May and June ridership will increase this number.

The Sierra College free fare plan began on August 22, 2022, and is scheduled to end on June 30, 2025.

Following the success of the first three years of this program, both Sierra College and Roseville would like to enter into a new three-year agreement to continue to provide free boardings to Sierra College students on Roseville Transit's fixed route service. Due to the increase in operating costs experienced by Roseville Transit, staff negotiated with Sierra College a new reimbursement rate of $1.13 per ride.

If approved by the Council, the new agreement would go into effect on July 1, 2025, and will continue through June 30, 2028. The attached Sierra College Fareless Student Transit Pilot Program Reimbursement Agreement has been reviewed by both the City and Sierra College. The content of the agreement has been approved. However, as a public agency, Sierra College is unable to sign the

Page 841 of 1881 ends

agreement until after approval at the June 17, 2025, Board of Trustees meeting.

FISCAL IMPACT
For the first three years of the pilot program, Roseville Transit issued 25,900 free rides, which is an average of 8,633 rides per year. Staff expects an increase in the use of the free pass program as students become more familiar with the program and estimates total combined ridership for the three additional years to be approximately 36,000 free rides, or 12,000 rides per year. Under this assumption, the proposed agreement would obligate Sierra College to pay Roseville Transit $40,680, which will go towards Roseville Transit's operating costs. This proposed action will not impact the FY2025-26 Roseville Transit budget and does not require additional hours of service. There is no impact to the General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed actions are administrative activities for funding and are therefore not projects pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines section 15378 and are exempt under section 15061(b)(3). The proposed actions are also statutorily exempt from CEQA pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080(b)(10).

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community

6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Ed Scofield, Alternative Transportation Planner
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 25-197

2. Fareless Student Transit Pass Program City of Roseville 2025-2028-Unsigned REVIEWERS:

Ed Scofield, Public Works Department - Transportation Created/Initiated - 5/16/2025 Ed Scofield, Public Works Department - Transportation Approved - 5/16/2025 Jason Shykowski, Public Works Department - All Approved - 5/21/2025 Gretchen Hakala, City Attorney Department Approved - 5/27/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 6/3/2025
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/3/2025 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/4/2025 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 6/5/2025 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 6/6/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 6/6/2025

Page 842 of 1881 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 25-197

APPROVING A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF

ROSEVILLE AND SIERRA JOINT COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT, AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT

ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, a Reimbursement Agreement for the Fareless Student Transit Pass Program, by and between the City of Roseville and Sierra Joint Community College District, has been reviewed by the City Council.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Reimbursement Agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville; and
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2025, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk

Page 843 of 1881 ends

1 Rev. 04/2025

SIERRA JOINT COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FARELESS STUDENT

TRANSIT PROGRAM AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
This Fareless Student Transit Pass Program and Reimbursement Agreement (the “Agreement”) is made as of the 17th day of June, 2025 (“Effective Date”) by and between City of Roseville, a municipal corporation providing public transit services (“Agency”) and Sierra Joint Community College District (“College” or “District”), sometimes referred to individually as “Party” and collectively as the “Parties”.

RECITALS
A. The District and Agency have established a Fareless Student Transit Pass Program (the “Program”) to increase student access to available public transit services, increase student transit ridership, and create a new generation of transit riders. The Program allows any eligible College student to board Agency’s public transit services without paying a fare, provided that the student displays a valid form of identification to the transit vehicle operator when boarding the transit service.

B. The District has agreed to share in the cost of the Program as defined below in Sections 4 and 5 of this Agreement.

C. Program participation is for a three-year program beginning July 1, 2025, and ending June 30, 2028.
a. Year 1 of the Program Period is from July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026 b. Year 2 of the Program Period is from July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2027 c. Year 3 of the Program Period is from July 1, 2027, through June 30, 2028 d. The periods will be referred to as “Program Year”.

D. Under the Program, District shall be authorized to advertise and make available the Fareless Student Transit Pass Program to its students (“Participant” or “Participants”) on the terms and conditions provided herein and will receive a quarterly invoice (“Invoice”) from Agency for the reimbursement of a portion of transit fare revenues lost from Participants accessing Agency’s transit services for free during the Program Period, based on a mutually agreed upon methodology described herein.

E. District shall make available student data by year, including actively enrolled students, graduation rates and other student academic data to help Agency and other regional transportation planning agencies administer and analyze the performance of the Program.

F. During the Program Period, District and Agency mutually agree to administer surveys onboard Agency’s transit services to monitor Participant satisfaction and solicit Program feedback, as well as conduct other data collection activities that support general transit service planning efforts and potential funding opportunities to expand the Program.

G. The Parties desire to enter into this Agreement to outline each Party’s roles and obligations for the Program.

Page 844 of 1881 ends

2 Rev. 04/2025
Now therefore, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows:

AGREEMENT

1. Service

1.1. The Recitals are hereby incorporated by reference in this Agreement.

1.2. During the Program Period, Agency shall allow each Participant, as defined in Section 3 of this Agreement, unlimited access on all Agency’s fixed-route transit and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) required complementary paratransit services, (“transit services”) in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Participants must display a valid College Student Identification Card or other student identification through the College’s available electronic mobile application platform to the transit operator when boarding Agency’s transit services.

1.3. Exhibit A of this Agreement contains an example of District’s current College Student Identification Card and electronic mobile application student identification method for reference. The student identification method(s) may be modified by District at any time during the Program. District must notify Agency immediately about any change to the design and application of the student identification method so that Agency can continue recognizing eligible Participants and effectively administering the Program on Agency’s transit services.

1.4. During the Program, District and Agency may agree to incorporating alternative student identification methodology and/or Participant verification pass for the Program that may include, but not be limited to, the implementation of a commercial vendor electronic fare payment application pass that would further support the Program’s intent and administration.

1.5. Agency will be responsible for the daily collection of ridership data associated with Participant boardings on Agency’s transit services. The data collection methodology shall be mutually agreed upon by both Parties; and may include, but not be limited to, hand-counted boarding data, electronic GFI data, and/or any other available mobile fare application data that identifies Participant ridership accessing Agency’s transit services.

The ridership data shall be provided by Agency to District as part of the quarterly invoice process to reimburse Agency’s transit fare revenue loss as described in Sections 4 and 5 of this Agreement.

1.6. Any ridership information that Agency provides to District will be aggregated and anonymized pursuant to California Streets and Highways Code Section 31490.

1.7. District and Agency will coordinate to promote and market the Program to encourage Participants to utilize Agency’s transit services. District and Agency will collectively produce and display marketing materials (i.e. flyers, brochures, and posters) regarding

Page 845 of 1881 ends

3 Rev. 04/2025
the Program at mutually agreed upon physical locations that may include, but not be limited to, College campus, student newsletters, and flyers or other promotional displays on transit vehicles. Marketing materials may also be digital communications, which District and Agency shall distribute to potential Participants through electronic mail, social media, website, and/or other practical and feasible means. District shall obtain Agency’s consent and approval prior to distribution of such materials that reference Agency (where applicable), developed by District.

1.8. District and Agency shall mutually coordinate on surveying Participants during the Program Period regarding Program satisfaction and solicit feedback. This must occur at least once during each Program Year. Additionally, District and Agency agree to collaboratively administer other data collection activities to assist with overall transit service planning efforts and support potential funding opportunities to expand the Program.

1.9. District shall be responsible for the overall administration of the Program by performing the following functions, all as more particularly described in this Agreement:
a. Determine whether a student is enrolled and eligible to participate in the Program, b. Administer waiver forms to students who are eligible to participate, c. Provide the College Student Identification Card and/or other agreed upon method of student identification (excluding any commercial mobile fare application payment that may be directly implemented by Agency),
d. Maintain Participant ridership records provided by Agency, e. Collect and maintain Participant survey data and/or other data that assists with Program implementation and expansion,
f. Provide data, as requested, to sponsoring regional transportation planning agencies that are financially assisting with funding the Program’s implementation, and g. Administer the reimbursement of lost transit fare revenues for Agency after pursuant to the terms and conditions defined in Sections 4 and 5 of this Agreement.

2. Term and Termination

2.1. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and shall continue through June 30, 2028, subject to either Party’s election to terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, by prior written notice to the other Party specifying the date of such termination. Notice of termination either Party shall be given at least sixty (60) days in advance of the termination date set forth in the notice of termination.

2.2. If either party terminates all or any part of this Agreement for its convenience under Section 2.1 hereof, the Program will remain valid until the end of the current Program Year.

2.3. If District terminates the Program, District shall be responsible for posting notices at District’s site notifying the Participants of the Program’s termination at least sixty (60) days in advance of the termination date (“Termination Posting”). The Termination

Page 846 of 1881 ends

4 Rev. 04/2025
Posting shall include a notice that the Fareless Transit Pass Program will no longer be accepted by Agency as of the end of the current Program Year.

2.4. If either Party fails to comply with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, then the Party shall be in default under this Agreement and in addition to all remedies available at law or equity, the other Party may terminate this Agreement upon at least fourteen (14) days written notice to defaulting Party. The Agency will discontinue accepting College Student Identification Cards and/or other agreed upon identification methodology, as valid fare onboard Agency’s transit services.

2.5. If a default can be cured, prior to termination for default, the other Party may issue a cure notice. If the defaulting Party fails to cure the default within fourteen (14) days following the date of the cure notice or commence and complete the cure in accordance with such additional time limits as may be described in the cure notice, the other Party may terminate the Agreement immediately following the defaulting Party’s failure to cure such default within the applicable cure period and discontinue participation in the Program.

3. Eligible Participants

3.1. District shall be responsible for determining whether a College student meets the definition of an eligible Participant, as defined below.

3.2. For purposes of this Agreement and Program, a Participant is defined as an eligible student who is currently enrolled (either in-person at a College campus or online) during a Fall, Spring, and/or Summer semester course, regardless of the number of units enrolled, and has elected to participate in the Program by displaying a valid Student Identification Card or other mutually agreed upon form of electronic student identification when boarding Agency’s transit service vehicle.

4. Agency Fare Reimbursement Methodology

4.1. For each year of participation in the Program, District shall reimburse Agency quarterly for $1.13) of the estimated average fare revenue per Participant accessing its transit services for free. Reimbursement shall be based on the following formula:

Number of Participant boardings
X (multiplied by)
$1.13 of Agency’s estimated average fare revenue per Participant The number of Participant boardings shall be provided to District per the provisions established in Section 5 of this Agreement. The Agency’s estimated average fare revenue per Participant is currently determined as one dollar and thirteen cents ($1.13), which has been mutually agreed upon by Agency and District based on Agency’s calculation of Participants that would qualify for Agency’s applicable full- and halfprice fare costs to access the transit service.

Page 847 of 1881 ends

5 Rev. 04/2025

4.2. Upon mutual agreement, Agency and District may amend Agency’s estimated average fare revenue per Participant at any point during the Program Period subject to the noticing provisions established in Section 6 of this Agreement.

5. Payment of Reimbursement Invoice

5.1. Within fifteen (15) days following the completion of each quarter of the Program, Agency will submit an invoice to District with supporting documentation for the reimbursement of lost fare revenues attributed to the Participants that accessed Agency’s transit services during that given quarter, pursuant to the reimbursement formula identified in Section 4 of this Agreement.

5.2. District shall pay Agency the full amount invoiced within thirty (30) days of receipt of invoice.

5.3. If the District defaults on any payments, in addition to all rights and remedies available to Agency at law or in equity, Agency may terminate the Program subject to Section 2 of this Agreement. Agency’s failure to terminate this Agreement immediately after any missed payment shall not be construed as a waiver of Agency’s right to terminate this Agreement for any ongoing missed payment(s).

5.4. All outstanding invoice(s) shall be payable within thirty (30) days upon termination of this Agreement.

6. Noticing

6.1. All notices required or permitted hereunder shall be delivered in person, by messenger, by overnight courier or by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, or by electronic mail (e-mail) to the receiving Party at its address shown below or to any other place designated in writing by such Party. Any such notice shall be deemed received: (i) upon delivery, if delivered personally or by messenger; (ii) the next business day after delivery if delivered by courier; (iii) three (3) days after deposit into the United States Mail in Placer and/or Nevada Counties, California, if delivered by registered or certified mail; or (iv) if it is delivered by e-mail, when the recipient, by an e-mail sent to the email address for the sender or by a notice delivered by another method in accordance with this Section, acknowledges having received the sender’s email, provided that an automatic “read receipt” does not constitute acknowledgment of an email for purposes of this Section:

To District: Sierra Joint Community College District
5100 Sierra College Boulevard
Rocklin, CA 95677
Attention: David Martin, VP Administrative Services
E-mail: [email protected]
(916) 660-7600

Page 848 of 1881 ends

6 Rev. 04/2025
To Agency: City of Roseville
Alternative Transportation Division
316 Vernon Street Suite 150
Roseville, CA 95678
Attention: Ed Scofield, Alternative Transportation Manager E-mail: [email protected]
(916) 774-5449

7. General Provisions

7.1. District shall establish and maintain proper record keeping procedures to properly document its implementation of the Program. District shall retain all original records and documents related to the Program for a period of three (3) years after the date of termination of this Agreement, subject to the requirements of Section 31490 of the Streets and Highways Code.

7.2. No officer, member, or employee of District or Agency and no members of its respective governing body, and no other public official or employee of the governing body of the locality of localities included within District and/or Agency’s service boundaries, during his or her tenure or for one year thereafter, shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement or the proceeds thereof.

7.3. This Agreement may not be amended or modified except by means of a writing executed by both Parties and expressly stating that it is an amendment or modification to this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to give third party beneficiary rights to any person not a party to this Agreement.

7.4. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit Agency’s right to establish service routes or perform any functions authorized by Agency’s governing body.

Nothing herein shall be construed to give District rights to receive any particular transit service routes, levels of service, or Agency participation. No provision of this Agreement shall be construed to require Agency to continue to operate any transit services to or from District or elsewhere during the Term of the Agreement, and it is expressly agreed that Agency shall incur no liability to District by reason of any rerouting, rescheduling, discontinuance or other changes in transit services operated by Agency.

7.5. The Parties shall be responsible for the acts and omissions of their respective officers, employees, and agents; provided, however, that nothing in this provision or otherwise contained in the provisions of this Agreement shall be construed as an express or implied waiver by either party.

7.6. Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed or construed as creating a partnership, joint venture, or association between the Parties, or cause either Party to be responsible in any way for the debts or obligations of the other Party.

Page 849 of 1881 ends

7 Rev. 04/2025

7.7. Neither any officer or employee thereof of Agency shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by District in connection with any work performed by and/or service provided by District, its officers, agents, employees and subcontractors under this Agreement. District shall fully indemnify, defend, Agency and each of their officers, agents and employees, harmless from and against any liability and expenses, including without limitation, defense costs, any costs or liability on account of bodily injury, death or personal injury of any person or for damage to or loss of risk of property, any legal fees and any claims for damages of any nature whatsoever arising out of District’s participation in the Program, including without limitation (i) breach of District’s representations, warranties, or obligations under this Agreement; or (ii) any act or omission of the District, or its officers, agents, employees, students, contractors or subcontractors in connection with its participation in the Program; or (iii) theft, forgery or other similar causes.

7.8. Neither District nor any of its officers, employees, agents, volunteers or authorized representatives shall be responsible for any claim, damage, injury or liability to the extent it arises from Agency’s administration of the Program or operation of Agency’s transportation system and/or services. Agency shall fully indemnify and defend District and each of their officers, employees, agents, volunteers or authorized representatives, harmless from and against any liability and expenses, including without limitation, defense costs, any costs or liability on account of bodily injury, death, or personal injury of any person or for damage to or loss of risk of property, any legal fees and any claims for damages of any nature whatsoever arising out of Agency’s participation in the Program, including without limitation (i) breach of Agency’s representations, warranties, or obligations under this Agreement; or (ii) any act or omission of the Agency, or its officers, agents, employees, students, contractors, or subcontractors in connection with its participation in the Program; or (iii) theft, forgery or other similar causes.

7.9. This Agreement supersedes all prior agreements between the Parties with respect to its subject matter and constitutes a complete and exclusive statement of the terms of the agreement between the parties with respect to its subject matter. Any oral representations or modifications concerning this Agreement shall be of no force or effect.

7.10. District shall not assign this Agreement, or any part thereof, without prior written approval of Agency, and any assignment without said consent shall be void and unenforceable, unless otherwise approved in writing by Agency.

7.11. This Agreement may be signed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same agreement. Handwritten signatures to this Agreement transmitted by facsimile or other electronic means (for example, through use of a Portable Document Format or “PDF” file) shall be valid and effective to bind the Party so signing.

Page 850 of 1881 ends

8 Rev. 04/2025

7.12. Each person signing this Agreement on behalf of each Party represents and warrants that the Party as named herein is a legal entity authorized to do business in the State of California and that he or she is duly authorized and has legal capacity to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of Party. Each Party represents and warrants to the other that the execution and delivery of the Agreement and the performance of such Party’s obligation hereunder have been duly authorized, no consent of any other party to do so is required except for consents that have been obtained or made and are in full effect, and that the Agreement is a valid and legal agreement binding on such party and enforceable in accordance of these terms.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the Effective Date.

Sierra Joint Community College District:

By: _____________________________________
David Martin
Vice President, Administrative Services
City of Roseville
By: _____________________________________
Dominick Casey
City Manager
Approved as to form:

By: _____________________________________
Michelle Sheidenberger
City Attorney

Page 851 of 1881 ends

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 6/18/2025
Item #: VII.18
File #: 0203-10
Item ID: 2025-198
Title: Downtown Library Security Guard Services - Sole Source Contract Purchase Agreement Contact: Narinderpal Sufi 916-774-5234 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a sole source contract purchase agreement with Allied Universal Security Services in the amount of $121,512.33 to provide continued security guard services at the Downtown Roseville library location. The company has the working knowledge of the area and issues and can provide additional support as needed from guards already stationed in the Downtown area. Funding for Downtown security guard services is included in the proposed Parks, Recreation & Libraries FY2025-26 budget in the General Fund.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a sole source contract purchase agreement with Allied Universal Security Services to provide security guard services at the Downtown Library. Staff also requests authorization for the City Manager to execute four optional one-year extensions to the contract without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council, or until staff determines that continuing with this vendor is not in the best interest of the City.

BACKGROUND
Allied Universal Security Services was selected to allow consistency of approach, staffing and resources in the Downtown area. The company has the working knowledge of the area and issues and can provide additional support as needed from guards already stationed in the Downtown area. Allied Universal Security Services shall provide unarmed security guard services at the Downtown Library during open hours, and on as-needed basis in accordance with attached Sole Source Contract Purchase Agreement.

Any additional services for special coverage must be approved in advance by the authorized member of the Library.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for Downtown security guard services is included in the proposed Parks, Recreation & Libraries FY2025-26 budget in the General Fund. The Sole Source Contract Purchase Agreement not-to-exceed amount for FY2025-26 is $121,512.33.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378.

Approval of a contract purchase agreement meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

Page 852 of 1881 ends

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community

6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Narinderpal Sufi, City Librarian
Jill Geller, Parks Recreation and Libraries Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 25-198

2. 3004589 Contract Purchase Agreement
REVIEWERS:

Cambria Evans, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department - Library Created/Initiated - 5/21/2025 Narinderpal Sufi, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department - Library Approved - 5/22/2025 Jill Geller, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries - All Approved - 5/29/2025 Gretchen Hakala, City Attorney Department Approved - 5/30/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 6/3/2025
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/3/2025 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/4/2025 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 6/5/2025 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 6/6/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 6/6/2025

Page 853 of 1881 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 25-198

APPROVING A CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY

OF ROSEVILLE AND UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICE LP DBA ALLIED

UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO

EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, a contract purchase agreement (3004589) to provide Downtown Library security guard services, by and between the City of Roseville and Universal Protection Service LP dba Allied Universal Security Services, has been reviewed by the City Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is hereby approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager or his or her designee is authorized to execute four (4) additional one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council, or until staff determines that continuing with this consultant is not in the best interest of the City.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 20 , by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk

Page 854 of 1881 ends

Contract Purchase Agreement 3004589
Supplier Details:

Company Universal Protection Service LP dba Allied Universal Security Services Contact Kavin Francis
Address PO Box 31001-2374
Pasadena, CA 91110
Submit your response to:

Company City of Roseville
Contact Tiffany Valdez
Address Purchasing Division
311 Vernon St
Roseville, CA 95678
Phone (916) 746-1109
Fax (916) 746-1115
E-mail [email protected]
This Contract Purchase Agreement is sent for your review and acceptance. Notify the Buyer via email of any needed changes to the company name, address, and contact information. The Buyer will update the agreement prior to you signing the document.

Return signed copies of the agreement to the Buyer noted on the agreement. Alterations or modifications to the agreement are not allowed. Upon receipt of all necessary documents, the City will sign the agreement and return a fully executed copy to you. Receipt of the signed copy will be your notice to proceed with the work in accordance with the terms and conditions of the agreement. Work must not begin until the contract has been fully executed.

The following guidelines must be followed for the signature block on the agreement:

Sole proprietorship - By owner
Partnership - Any general partner
Corporation - Two options:
(1) A signature from the President and the corporate seal; OR (2) One signature from the Chairman of the Board, President, or any Vice President AND one signature from the Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer, or any Treasurer or Assistant Treasurer of the corporation
*General Manager, Office Manager and/or Sales Manager are not corporate officer titles. The agreement will be rejected if not signed in accordance with these guidelines.

Insurance requirements:

The City's insurance requirements are referenced on Attachment A of the agreement. By signing the agreement, you are confirming that your company has the minimum insurance limits required. 1 Docusign Envelope ID: 4C29E2B4-27C6-4383-87D1-66F72E2AF99E

Page 855 of 1881 ends

Contract Purchase Agreement 3004589
Agreement 3004589
Agreement Date 19-MAY-2025
Revision 0
Agreement Amount 121,512.33 USD
Invoice To City of Roseville
Accounts Payable
311 Vernon St
ROSEVILLE CA 95678
Supplier Universal Protection Service LP dba Allied
Universal Security Services
PO Box 31001-2374
Pasadena, CA 91110
Phone:

Fax:

Email:
(916) 774-5488
(916) 784-3796
[email protected]
Phone:

Fax:

Email:
(916) 426-5294
()
[email protected]
Description of
Labor,
equipment
and/or materials

THE VENDOR SHALL PROVIDE SECURITY GUARD SERVICES AT THE

DOWNTOWN ROSEVILLE LIBRARY ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ATTACHED "ALLIED UNIVERSAL, DOWNTOWN ROSEVILLE LIBRARY, SECURITY BUDGET JULY 2025 - JUNE 2026" PRICING SHEET. ADDITIONAL

DOLLARS ARE INCLUDED ON THE AGREEMENT FOR ANY UNFORESEEN SPECIAL COVERAGE REQUESTS. ANY ADDITIONAL SERVICES FOR SPECIAL COVERAGE (I.E. SPECIAL EVENTS, ETC.) MUST BE APPROVED IN ADVANCE BY

AN AUTHORIZED MEMBER OF THE PARKS, RECREATION, AND LIBRARIES DEPARTMENT.

CONTACT CAMBRIA EVANS IN THE PARKS, RECREATION, AND LIBRARIES DEPARTMENT AT (916)746-1213 OR [email protected] FOR QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS AGREEMENT.
*The total agreement amount is an approximation only. The City does not guarantee whatsoever the actual value of this contract.

Customer # Supplier # Payment Terms Freight Terms FOB Shipping Method 14786 Net 30 Freight on Board at the destination Destination Best Method Start Date End Date Confirm To
01-Jul-2025 30-Jun-2026 Tiffany Valdez Phone 1-916-746-1109 Attention: Total Cost not to exceed the agreement amount without prior approval of the Purchasing office. 2 Docusign Envelope ID: 4C29E2B4-27C6-4383-87D1-66F72E2AF99E

Page 856 of 1881 ends

Contract Purchase Agreement 3004589
Negotiated T&Cs for Universal Protection Service LP dba Allied Universal Security Services, Rev. 9/19/22

1. To the fullest extent allowed by law, Contractor shall defend, indemnify, and save and hold harmless City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers from any claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought forth, or on account of, injuries to or death of any person (including but not limited to workers and the public), or damage to property, resulting from or arising out of Contractor's willful misconduct or negligent act or omission while engaged in the performance of obligations or exercise of rights created by this Agreement, except those matters arising from City's sole negligence or willful misconduct. The parties intend that this provision shall be broadly construed. Contractor's responsibility for such defense and indemnity obligations shall survive the termination or completion of this Agreement for the full period of time allowed by law. The defense and indemnity obligations of this Agreement are undertaken in addition to, and shall not in any way be limited by, the insurance obligations contained in this Agreement. Notwithstanding anything contained in this Agreement to the contrary, should Contractor be found liable for any losses hereunder for any reason, the sole and exclusive remedy of City in any situation, whether in contract or tort, or otherwise, shall be limited to City's actual and direct damages, and shall in no event exceed $500,000 or available insurance limits, whichever is greater. Under no circumstances will Contractor be liable to City, or any other person or entity, for consequential, incidental, indirect or punitive damages, or for lost profits.

2. Contractor is an independent contractor, and shall not be considered an officer, agent or employee of the City.

3. Without the written consent of the City, this Agreement is not assignable by Contractor either in whole or in part.

4. Time is of the essence of this Agreement.

5. At any time during the term of this Agreement, the City has the right to terminate this Agreement, provided Contractor is given thirty (30) days written notice. City's termination shall be without further liability to City; however, Contractor shall be entitled to all costs reasonably incurred prior to the date of termination. Contractor acknowledges that City may terminate this Agreement should funds not be appropriated by its governing body to continue services under this Agreement.

6. This Agreement may only be amended or modified in writing. It is integrated and contains the complete understanding of the parties.

7. All equipment, supplies and services sold to the City of Roseville shall conform to the general safety orders of the State of California.

8. Unless notified to the contrary, in writing, the City assumes that the Contractor has accepted the work in accordance with the plans and specifications (if any) and agrees to do the work in compliance with this Agreement.

9. All fair employment practices must be adhered to. In addition, if the project referenced on this service agreement is a Public Works project, all prevailing wage laws must be complied with. For prevailing wage contracts over $25,000, copies of certified payroll must be submitted with invoices. Prevailing wage rates may be obtained from the State Department of Industrial Relations and/or the following website address: http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/DPreWageDetermination.htm. 3 Docusign Envelope ID: 4C29E2B4-27C6-4383-87D1-66F72E2AF99E

Page 857 of 1881 ends

Contract Purchase Agreement 3004589

10. Contractor agrees to the below insurance requirements:
a. Unless otherwise specified, the Contractor shall maintain the policies of insurance outlined in Attachment A, incorporated herein by this reference, in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement. The City of Roseville retains sole discretion in determining the types and proper levels of insurance coverage.
b. Form. Contractor shall submit a certificate evidencing such coverage for the period covered by this Agreement in a form satisfactory to Risk Management and the City Attorney, prior to undertaking any work hereunder. Any insurance written on a claims made basis is subject to the approval of Risk Management and the City Attorney.
c. Additional Insureds. Contractor shall also provide a separate endorsement or section of the policy showing City, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers as additional insureds to the extent of Contractor's contractual liability, up to the contractually required limits, for each type of coverage, except for Workers' Compensation. Such insurance shall specifically cover the contractual liability of Contractor. The additional insured coverage under the Contractor's policy shall be primary and noncontributory, as evidenced by a separate endorsement or section of the policy, and shall not seek contribution from City's insurance or self-insurance. In addition, the additional insured coverage shall be at least as broad as the Insurance Services Office (ISO) CG 20 10 and CG 20 37 Endorsement.
d. Cancellation/Modification. Contractor shall provide thirty (30) days written notice to City prior to cancellation or modification of any insurance required by this Agreement.
e. Umbrella/Excess Insurance. The limits of insurance required in this Agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and excess insurance. Any excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and noncontributory basis for the benefit of City (if agreed to in a written contract) before City's own insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured.
f. Subcontractors. Contractor agrees to include in its contracts with all subcontractors the same requirements and provisions of this Agreement, including the indemnity and insurance requirements, to the extent they apply to the scope of the subcontractor's work. Furthermore, Contractor shall require its subcontractors to agree to be bound to Contractor and City in the same manner and to the same extent as Contractor is bound to City under this Agreement.

Additionally, Contractor shall obligate its subcontractors to comply with these same provisions with respect to any tertiary subcontractor, regardless of tier. A copy of City's indemnity and insurance provisions will be furnished to the subcontractor or tertiary subcontractor upon request.
g. Self-Insured Retentions. All self-insured retentions (SIR) must be disclosed to Risk Management and shall not reduce the limits of liability. Policies containing any SIR provision shall provide or be endorsed to provide that the SIR may be satisfied by either the named insured or City. The failure to exercise this right shall not constitute a waiver of such right.
h. Waiver of Subrogation. Contractor hereby agrees to waive subrogation which any insurer of Contractor may acquire from Contractor by virtue of the payment of any loss under a Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability or Automobile Liability policy. All Workers Compensation, Commercial General 4 Docusign Envelope ID: 4C29E2B4-27C6-4383-87D1-66F72E2AF99E

Page 858 of 1881 ends

Contract Purchase Agreement 3004589
Liability and Automobile Liability policies shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for all work performed by Contractor, its employees, agents and subcontractors. i. Liability/Remedies. Insurance coverage in the minimum amounts set forth herein shall not be construed to relieve Contractor of liability in excess of such coverage, nor shall it preclude City from taking such other actions as are available to it under any other provisions of this Agreement or law.

11. Contractor shall comply with all federal, state and local laws and ordinances, including but not limited to the City's storm water regulations, as may be applicable to the performance of services under this Agreement. Failure to comply with local ordinances may result in monetary fines and cancellation of this Agreement. Refer to www.roseville.ca.us/stormwater for links to more information on the City's storm water regulations.

12. In the event that the terms of any attachment or exhibit conflict with any terms of this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall control.

13. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. In the event that any signature is delivered by facsimile transmission or by e-mail delivery of a ".pdf" format data file, such signature shall create a valid and binding obligation of the party executing (or on whose behalf such signature is executed) with the same force and effect as if such facsimile or ".pdf" signature page were an original hereof.

14. If either party commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement or the performance thereof, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including but not limited to, court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorneys' fees. Any action arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in Placer County, California, regardless of where else venue may lie. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

15. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, successors, executors, administrators and assigns of the respective parties hereto.

16. If any of the provisions contained in this Agreement are for any reason held invalid or unenforceable, such holding shall not affect the remaining provisions or the validity and enforceability of the Agreement as a whole.

17. For purposes of this Agreement, the terms "Contractor," "Consultant," and "Supplier" are used interchangeably.

18. If the project referenced on this agreement is a Public Works project, then the following shall apply: No contractor or subcontractor may work on a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5. During the performance of this agreement, Contractor and its subcontractors shall have a continuing legal obligation to maintain current registration with the Department of Industrial Relations. Contractor is hereby notified that this project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.

19. If the project referenced on this agreement is a Public Works project, then the following shall apply: Contractor must submit all claims as defined in and in accordance with the claim resolution process set forth in Section 9204 of the Public Contract Code. Each such claim must be sent to the City by registered mail or 5 Docusign Envelope ID: 4C29E2B4-27C6-4383-87D1-66F72E2AF99E

Page 859 of 1881 ends

Contract Purchase Agreement 3004589
certified mail with return receipt requested and must contain reasonable documentation to support the claim. All claims must be received prior to acceptance of the work.

20. Contractor certifies that Contractor, its employees, directors, officers, agents, subcontractors, vendors, and volunteers are not presently debarred, excluded, suspended, declared ineligible, voluntarily excluded, or proposed for debarment, exclusion, suspension or ineligibility by any federal, state, or local department or agency.

21. This Agreement may be amended via change order, but only if such change order is made in writing, approved by the City, and signed by both parties.

22. CONTRACTOR agrees to defend and indemnify CITY if, despite the parties intent and practice, any venue, agency, or court with competent jurisdiction determines that CONTRACTOR and/or any of its agents, officers, employees, volunteers, independent contractors, or subcontractors, are characterized as employee(s) of CITY.

CONTRACTOR and CITY agree that: (a) CONTRACTOR is free from the control and direction of CITY in connection with the performance of the work; (b) CONTRACTOR is providing services directly to CITY; (c) CONTRACTOR has and will maintain at all relevant times a business license; (d) CONTRACTOR maintains a business location that is separate from CITY; (e) CONTRACTOR is customarily engaged in an independently established business of the same nature as that involved in the work performed hereunder; (f) CONTRACTOR actually contracts with other businesses to provide the same or similar services and maintains a clientele without restrictions from CITY; (g) CONTRACTOR advertises and holds itself out to the public as available to provide the same or similar services; (h) CONTRACTOR provides its own tools, vehicles, and equipment to perform the services; (i) CONTRACTOR has negotiated its own rates; (j) CONTRACTOR set its own hours and location of work in accomplishing CITY's on-call needs; and (k) CONTRACTOR has the right to control the manner and means of accomplishing the result desired and exercises its own expert independent judgement.

23. City shall pay Contractor for the performance of the work and any other products and/or services provided by Contractor hereunder at the rates ("Billing Rates") and other charges set forth in Attachment B.

24. The parties acknowledge that Contractor may experience an increase in its costs resulting from any change, whether or not anticipated, in: (1) Federal, state, provincial, territorial, or local taxes, levies, or required withholdings imposed or assessed on amounts payable to and/or by Contractor hereunder or by or in respect of Contractor to its personnel; (2) Federal, state, provincial, territorial, or local minimum wage rates, mandated paid time off and/or sick leave, changes in overtime wage regulations, uniform maintenance expenses or other required employee allowances, licensing fees and/or requirements, or wage, medical, welfare and other benefit costs under collective bargaining agreements; (3) costs related to insurance and/or workers' compensation; and/or (4) costs related to medical and/or welfare benefits and other requirements, including without limitation costs incurred by Contractor pursuant to applicable federal, state and/or local law, including, without limitation "Healthcare Reform Legislation Costs" ("Healthcare Reform Legislation Costs" means the costs and/or assessments incurred by Contractor in respect of employee medical and/or welfare benefits and other requirements under the applicable provincial, federal or local statutes and/or regulations). In consideration of the above-referenced circumstances, the parties reserve the right to renegotiate the terms of the Agreement should any of the above-referenced circumstances impact Contractor's pricing.

Contractor shall provide City sixty (60) days written notice of any changes in 6 Docusign Envelope ID: 4C29E2B4-27C6-4383-87D1-66F72E2AF99E

Page 860 of 1881 ends

Contract Purchase Agreement 3004589
pricing which impact the Billing Rates. Should City not accept the change in pricing, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement, provided Contractor is given thirty (30) days written notice. City's termination shall be without further liability to City; however, Contractor shall be entitled to all costs reasonably incurred prior to the date of termination.

The supplier named hereon by the acceptance of this order agrees to the provisions of this document titled "Contract Purchase Agreement" and all accompanying terms, conditions, and attachments.

Roseville Business License No. _____________________________________ Contractor License No. ____________________________________________ DIR Registration No. _______________________________________________ Check mark the applicable company type below:
___________ Corporation
__________ Limited Liability Company
__________ Partnership
___________ Sole Proprietor
City Reserves the right to withhold any payments to contractor in the event of noncompliance with insurance requirements or if required bylaw.

Negotiated T&Cs for Universal Protection Service LP dba Allied Universal Security Services REV 9/19/22 MD
7 Docusign Envelope ID: 4C29E2B4-27C6-4383-87D1-66F72E2AF99E 00836043
X
N/A
14417

Page 861 of 1881 ends

Contract Purchase Agreement 3004589
Contract Terms and Conditions
Addendum 1
This Addendum amends the existing negotiated City of Roseville Contract Terms and Conditions to include additional legislative requirements. The existing negotiated City of Roseville Contract Terms remain unchanged, unless expressly stated below, except that these legally required terms are now expressly incorporated.

Updated Section 9
All prevailing wages and fair employment practices must be adhered to. For prevailing wage contracts over $25,000, copies of certified payroll must be submitted with invoices. Prevailing wage rates may be obtained from the State Department of Industrial Relations and/or the following website address:
http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/DPreWageDetermination.htm In compliance with Labor Code Section 1773.2, as may be amended from time to time, Contractor shall cause a copy of this website to be posted at each jobsite, as applicable.

New Terms and Conditions

1. Contractor/consultant's duties and services under this agreement shall not include preparing or assisting the public entity with any portion of the public entity's preparation of a request for proposals, request for qualifications, or any other solicitation regarding a subsequent or additional contract with the public entity. The public entity entering this agreement shall at all times retain responsibility for public contracting, including with respect to any subsequent phase of this project. Contractor/consultant's participation in the planning, discussions, or drawing of project plans or specifications, if any, shall be limited to conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications.

Contractor/consultant shall cooperate with the public entity to ensure that all bidders for a subsequent contract on any subsequent phase of this project have access to the same information, including all conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications prepared by contractor pursuant to this agreement.

2. The Levine Act (Govt. Code, Section 84308) requires a Party (and its agent (s), if any) to a Proceeding before the City of Roseville that involves any action or consideration related to their contract, license, permit, or other entitlement for use, to disclose any campaign contributions made to City elected or appointed officers totaling more than $250 within the twelve (12) months prior to the City decision and while a proceeding is pending, and includes certain prohibitions on contribution activity thereafter. If applicable campaign contributions have been made by Contractor and/or its agent(s), Contractor is responsible for compliance, including for its disclosure obligations, if any, as further described at:
https://www.roseville.ca.
us/government/departments/city_clerk/transparency/levine_act

3. Vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) greater than 8,500 lbs. and light duty package delivery vehicles operated in California may be subject to the California Air Resources Board (CARB) Advanced Clean Fleets regulations. Such vehicles may therefore be subject to requirements to reduce emissions and air pollutants. For more information, visit the CARB Advanced Clean Fleet webpage at: https://ww2.arb.cagov/ourwork/programs/advanced-clean-fleets Rev. 4/30/24 JS
8 Docusign Envelope ID: 4C29E2B4-27C6-4383-87D1-66F72E2AF99E

Page 862 of 1881 ends

Contract Purchase Agreement 3004589

ATTACHMENT A

HUMAN RESOURCES/RISK MANAGEMENT DIVISION

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

AGREEMENT OVER FORMAL BID LIMIT OR INVOLVING HIGH RISK ACTIVITIES Negotiated for Universal Protection Service LP dba Allied Universal Security, rev. 9/19/22 General - Required Coverage/Documentation
● General Liability: $2 Million per occurrence /$5 Million aggregate ● Automobile Liability: $2 Million combined single limit ● Workers' Compensation: Statutory *Must provide a Waiver of subrogation ● Additional Insured Endorsement (AIE) - General Liability policy: CG 20 10 04 13 or CG 20 37 04 13 or an equivalent, blanket endorsement or section of the policy. Endorsement shall cover the City of Roseville, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers as additional insured. ● Policies must be primary and non-contributory
● A 30 day notice of cancellation must be provided
● List certificate holder as: The City of Roseville - Insurance Compliance, PO Box 100085-R1, Duluth, GA 30096
Additional Liability/Insurance Requirements if required by Agreement (and marked below):

Construction:____
General Liability:
$2 Million/occurrence
$4 Million aggregate
Design Professional:____
General Liability:
$2 Million/occurrence
$4 Million aggregate
Professional Liability:
$2 Million/occurrence
Professional Consultant:____
Professional Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
IT Services:____
Professional Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
No auto required
Cyber Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
Hazardous Materials:____
Pollution Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
Special Events/Caterers-Vendors:____
No auto required
No workers' comp required
Professional Counseling/ Psychological:____
Professional Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
No auto required
9 Docusign Envelope ID: 4C29E2B4-27C6-4383-87D1-66F72E2AF99E

Page 863 of 1881 ends

Contract Purchase Agreement 3004589
Pyrotechnics:____
General Liability:
$5 Million/occurrence
$10 Million aggregate
Auto - $2 Million/occurrence
Chemical/Environmental:____
General Liability:
$3 Million/occurrence
$6 Million aggregate
Pollution – $2 Million/Occurrence
Auto - $2 Million/Occurrence
Insurance Submission Process
The City of Roseville Human Resources/Risk Management Department uses a service called EBIX to manage our insurance certificate tracking.

How It Works
● The vendor's contact information is entered into EBIX. EBIX will contact the vendor to request proof of insurance.
● The Vendor can forward the request to their Insurance Agent(s) if necessary. ● Vendor/Insurance Agent submits insurance to EBIX by email to [email protected] or by fax to (770) 325-5727. After faxing or emailing the certificate, please DO NOT send the certificate by mail to EBIX. Please do not mail, email or fax any certificates to the City of Roseville. ● Once submitted, EBIX reviews the insurance documentation. If there are deficiencies, EBIX will send a follow up letter or email requesting additional information.

Questions Regarding Insurance Submission: Contact EBIX at (951) 652-4239 Questions Regarding Insurance Requirements Contact Risk Management at (916) 774-5202 10 Docusign Envelope ID: 4C29E2B4-27C6-4383-87D1-66F72E2AF99E

Page 864 of 1881 ends

Contract Purchase Agreement 3004589
Supplier
Signature:______________________________________________ Print Name:_____________________________________________ Title:__________________________________________________ Date: __________________________________________________ Supplier
Signature:______________________________________________ Print Name:_____________________________________________ Title:__________________________________________________ Date: __________________________________________________ City of Roseville, A Municipal Corporation
Signature:______________________________________________ Print Name: Dominick Casey
Title: City Manager
Date:__________________________________________________ 11 Docusign Envelope ID: 4C29E2B4-27C6-4383-87D1-66F72E2AF99E Courtney White
Regional Vice President
5/19/2025

Page 865 of 1881 ends

225825
BUDGET PROJECTIONS: 2025
Pay Weekly Bill *Estimated *Estimated *Estimated
Rate Hours Rate Weekly Cost Monthly Annual
Security Professional $23.00 56 $ 32.22 $1,804.32 $7,812.71 $94,077.24 Security Professional Overtime $34.50 10 $ 50.40 $504.05 $2,182.51 $26,280.91 Security Professional -July 4th $34.50 8 $ 50.40 $0.00 $0.00 $403.20 66 $2,308.37 $9,995.22 $120,761.35
*Does not include 7 holidays
Estimated Annual Cost including holidays = $121,512.33
Holidays total 7 days @ time and 1/2
Annual w/holidays Mo Amt w/holidays
$121,512.33 $10,126.03
PASS -THRU ITEM:

Annual Cost $0.00
LIDAYS: Allied Universal recognizes the following holidays.

New Year's Day Presidents Day Memorial Day Thanksgiving Day MLK Day Labor Day Independence Day Christmas Day
SPECIAL COVERAGE REQUEST: All Requests for additional coverage (not listed above) shall be billed at a rate 0F $ 50.00 PER HOUR
SECURITY BUDGET July 2025-June 2026

DOWNTOWN ROSEVILLE LIBRARY
Estimated Weekly Cost
Docusign Envelope ID: 4C29E2B4-27C6-4383-87D1-66F72E2AF99E

Page 866 of 1881 ends

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 6/18/2025
Item #: VII.19
File #: 0704-01
Item ID: 2025-307
Title: Pistachio Regional Park - Master Plan Update Approval Contact: Tara Gee 916-774-5253 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of the master plan update for Pistachio Regional Park. Funding for the design of the skate track and splash pad has been recommended from the Public Facilities Fund in the proposed FY2025-26 Capital Improvement Program budget. Staff intends to recommend funding for the project construction in FY2026-27. Funding sources for future phases of the park will include the Citywide Park - West Roseville Specific Plan Fund and the Public Facilities Fund. Maintenance of citywide parks is funded by the General Fund.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the master plan update for Pistachio Regional Park in the West Roseville Specific Plan area.

BACKGROUND
Location and Size
This 44-acre city-wide park site is located in the West Roseville area off of West Park Drive and High School Road. The location is south of Coyote Creek and adjacent to West Park High School.

Background
In October 2017, the Parks & Recreation Commission recommended approval of the master plan for Pistachio Regional Park. At that time, acreage was set aside to accommodate three soccer fields and a parking lot to support the vision to build a soccer complex on the north side of Coyote Creek. The soccer complex project was a partnership between the City of Roseville and Placer Valley Tourism.

Original Master Plan
The original master plan included:
• Joint-use amenities with the high school, such as a baseball field, softball fields, and tennis courts • City-wide amenities, including
o A children’s play area
o Two covered picnic areas
o Four pickleball courts
o Two futsal courts
o A satellite corporation yard
o A walkway system, connecting to both the high school and the other half of the park parcel with interpretive/educational exhibits or signage outlining various historic aspects of the overall site o The Fiddyment Homestead
o A universally accessible play area
o Parking lots

Page 867 of 1881 ends

o Restrooms
o An enclosed event space with architectural detail that might look like a barn and could be used as a rentable space for special events
o A formal garden area capitalizing on the existing Oak trees, where outdoor events such as weddings and private parties could be held
o An informal interpretive area with walkways and interactive interpretive/educational exhibits and/or play features
Changes Since 2018
The City Council formally approved the master plan in July 2018. Since Council approval of the master plan, many changes have occurred. These include:
• The high school district constructed new tennis courts within their high school campus • Placer Valley Tourism redirected their efforts towards an indoor multi-sport facility, now known as the Roebbelen Center
• The new Placer Valley Soccer Complex project, currently under construction, includes a universally accessible playground and a satellite corporation yard
Additionally, public feedback in West Roseville expressed a desire to locate parks and recreation facilities for:
• A community center/library
• A splash pad
• A destination level skate track
• A destination level BMX track
• A swimming pool
Changes within the West Roseville area and public feedback allowed staff to re-examine the master plan.

Proposed Master Plan Revision
In response to the changes and resident feedback, the master plan revision proposes to add:
• A multi-story community center that includes meeting spaces, fitness, gymnasiums, library, event rentals and a pool
• A splash pad/spray ground
• A destination level skate track
• A destination level BMX track
• Increases the number of pickleball courts from four courts to six • Decreases the number of tennis courts from six to three • Eliminates the satellite corporation yard
Public Outreach
Since 2018, staff have had ongoing discussions with the West Roseville neighbors, either formally at neighborhood meetings and during public workshops for neighborhood parks in that area, or informally through events and individual conversations. Additionally, in recent years, staff have met with the skate and BMX communities regarding the overall approach to locating and building skate and BMX facilities.

In early December 2023, a virtual workshop was held to share the proposed revisions. Residents were invited to share comments through email as well. The feedback was all positive and in support of the

Page 868 of 1881 ends

proposed updates.

Phasing
A master plan is a high-level plan that conveys a vision for now and into the future. As with all city-wide parks, improvements are phased based on park development fund balances and approved allocations from the General Fund for maintenance.

Parks & Recreation Commission
The Parks & Recreation Commission reviewed the master plan update at the February 5, 2024, meeting, and unanimously approved forwarding it to Council for approval.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for the design of the skate track and splash pad has been recommended from the Public Facilities Fund in the proposed FY2025-26 Capital Improvement Program budget. Staff intends to recommend funding the project construction in FY2026-27. Funding sources for future phases of the park will include the Citywide Park - West Roseville Specific Plan Fund and the Public Facilities Fund. Maintenance of citywide parks is funded by the General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Initial CEQA compliance for the West Roseville Specific Plan (WRSP) Park Site F-56, Pistachio Park, was achieved in February 2004 with certification of the WRSP final Environmental Impact Report (EIR or Original EIR) (SCH #2002082057). An Addendum to the Original EIR was prepared in June 2018 to provide CEQA compliance for the Park Site F-56 Pistachio Park Master Plan. The Addendum was determined to be appropriate by the City Council, consistent with CEQA CEQA Guidelines § 15164.

The proposed Master Plan Update is found to be substantially consistent with the Addendum which demonstrates that the environmental analysis, impacts, and mitigation measures identified in the Original EIR supports a finding that the proposed project does not raise any new issues and does not exceed the level of impacts identified in the Original EIR. Consequently no additional CEQA action on the part of Council is required at this time.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community

2. Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world

3. Enhance economic vitality

4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Tara Gee, Park Planning and Development Manager
Jill Geller, Parks Recreation and Libraries Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Vicinity Map

Page 869 of 1881 ends

2. FINAL FINAL MP
REVIEWERS:

Tara Gee, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department - Park Development Created/Initiated - 5/19/2025 Tara Gee, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department - Park Development Approved - 5/19/2025 Jill Geller, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries - All Approved - 5/29/2025 Gretchen Hakala, City Attorney Department Approved - 5/30/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 6/3/2025
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/3/2025 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/5/2025 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 6/6/2025 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 6/6/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 6/6/2025

Page 870 of 1881 ends

Vicinity Map
Pistachio Regional Park

Page 871 of 1881 ends

PLAY AREA

SPLASH PAD

Page 872 of 1881 ends

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 6/18/2025
Item #: VII.20
File #: 0704
Item ID: 2025-342
Title: On-Call Landscape Construction Services - Contract Purchase Agreement Contact: Tara Gee 916-774-5253 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a contract purchase agreement with Michael Saenz dba Saenz Landscape Construction Company in the amount of $500,000 for on-call general landscape construction services.

Staff also recommends authorization for the City Manager to execute the optional extensions without further Council approval, based on approved budgets. Work performed under this agreement will utilize developer fees, capital rehabilitation funds and/or capital improvement project budgets.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve a contract purchase agreement (CPA #3004526) for on-call landscape construction services with Michael Saenz dba Saenz Landscape Construction Company, and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement.

Staff additionally requests authority for the City Manager or his designee to execute two (2) additional one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council, or until staff determines that continuing with this contractor is not in the best interest of the City.

BACKGROUND
In February 2025, a Request for Qualifications/Proposals was issued seeking experienced companies to submit to the Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department for on-call landscape construction services. The intent of this agreement is to utilize these services to meet project demands. This will allow for more responsiveness to resident, contractor and developer needs along with greater quality control during this time.

Three (3) companies responded to the Request for Qualifications/Proposals. After a panel review, and based on the company’s methodology, park project experience, familiarity with the City standards and technical expertise, Saenz Landscape Construction Company was selected and is recommended for contract approval.

On-call services do not guarantee an annual amount of work and are requested on an “as-needed” basis.

Additionally, annual extensions, if approved, will be based on project workload, needs and approved budgets. Approval of extensions is requested to be authorized by Council and delegated to the City Manager. If approved, the contract period would start from the date of Council approval and could extend to June 30, 2028 (FY2027-28).

FISCAL IMPACT
The CPA will include one (1) base year with two (2) one-year optional extensions up to $500,000 each

Page 873 of 1881 ends

year. Work performed under this agreement will be paid using developer fees, capital rehabilitation funds and/or capital improvement project budgets.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378.

Approval of a contract purchase agreement for on-call landscape construction services meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community

4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Tara Gee, Park Planning and Development Manager
Jill Geller, Parks Recreation and Libraries Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 25-218

2. Contract Purchase Agreement
REVIEWERS:

Tara Gee, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department - Park Development Created/Initiated - 5/28/2025 Tara Gee, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department - Park Development Approved - 5/28/2025 Jill Geller, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries - All Approved - 5/29/2025 Gretchen Hakala, City Attorney Department Approved - 5/30/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 6/5/2025
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/5/2025 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/6/2025 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 6/6/2025 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 6/6/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 6/8/2025

Page 874 of 1881 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 25-218

APPROVING A CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY

OF ROSEVILLE AND MICHAEL SAENZ DBA SAENZ LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION

COMPANY, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT

ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, a contract purchase agreement (3004526) to provide on-call landscape construction services, by and between the City of Roseville and Michael Saenz dba Saenz Landscape Construction Company, has been reviewed by the City Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is hereby approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager or his or her designee is authorized to execute two (2) additional one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council, or until staff determines that continuing with this consultant is not in the best interest of the City.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 20 , by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk

Page 875 of 1881 ends
Page 876 of 1881 ends
Page 877 of 1881 ends
Page 878 of 1881 ends
Page 879 of 1881 ends
Page 880 of 1881 ends
Page 881 of 1881 ends
Page 882 of 1881 ends
Page 883 of 1881 ends
Page 884 of 1881 ends
Page 885 of 1881 ends
Page 886 of 1881 ends
Page 887 of 1881 ends
Page 888 of 1881 ends
Page 889 of 1881 ends
Page 890 of 1881 ends
Page 891 of 1881 ends
Page 892 of 1881 ends
Page 893 of 1881 ends
Page 894 of 1881 ends
Page 895 of 1881 ends
Page 896 of 1881 ends
Page 897 of 1881 ends

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 6/18/2025
Item #: VII.21
File #: 0704
Item ID: 2025-339
Title: Parks Design & Construction Standards – 2025 Update Contact: Joel De Jong 916-774-5924 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of the 2025 updates to the Parks Design & Construction Standards. The Parks Design & Construction Standards is a guiding document that outlines design and construction standards applied to parks and streetscapes. The changes in this document will have no fiscal impact to projects or the General Fund.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to adopt the 2025 updates to the Parks Design & Construction Standards, for release starting July 1, 2025.

BACKGROUND
The Parks Design & Construction Standards is a guiding document that outlines design and construction standards applied to parks (neighborhood and city-wide), and streetscapes. This document is updated every two years in order to ensure new codes, regulations and requirements are updated or added, address typographical errors, provide clarity in areas that may cause multiple interpretations or misinterpretations, and to ensure the latest technology in irrigation, lighting and other systems.

The revisions included in the July 2025 update include:

1. Correction of typographical errors and minor clarifications;

2. Updated document requirements to reflect digital document workflow;

3. Updated optional features and supplier changes on various site furnishings;

4. Updated language to the Stormwater Pollution Control section to reflect the recent adoption of the State’s new stormwater permit;

5. Updated concrete section to reflect current industry best practices;

6. Changes to electrical equipment for park lighting time clocks;

7. Updated irrigation specifications to reflect adherence to the current Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance;

8. Revised standard Parks Details to reflect updated standards, as needed;

9. Created new detail for drip irrigation: and

10. Re-organized and named PK Details with sub-categories to make it easier to find particular details.

Feedback from contractors and staff is collected over each two-year period which provides the basis for updates/revisions.

FISCAL IMPACT
The changes in this document will have no fiscal impact to projects and could potentially reduce costs by identifying equipment and materials that are less labor intensive to install and maintain. There is no

Page 898 of 1881 ends

General Fund impact.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3).

The Parks Design & Construction Standards update does not include the potential for a significant environmental effect, and therefore is not subject to CEQA.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Joel De Jong, Park Development Project Manager
Jill Geller, Parks Recreation and Libraries Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 25-215

2. 2025 Parks Design & Construction Standards

3. 2025 Parks Design & Construction Standards, Redlines REVIEWERS:

Joel De Jong, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department - Park Development
Created/Initiated -
5/28/2025
Tara Gee, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department - Park Development Approved - 5/28/2025 Jill Geller, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries - All Approved - 5/29/2025 Gretchen Hakala, City Attorney Department Approved - 5/29/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 6/5/2025
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/5/2025 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 6/5/2025 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 6/6/2025 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 6/6/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 6/8/2025

Page 899 of 1881 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 25-215
ADOPTING THE 2025 PARKS DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS WHEREAS, in 1998, Council adopted the Parks Construction Standards to provide consistency in the construction of City parks; and
WHEREAS, these standards are updated every two years to ensure that the requirements remain up-to-date and applicable to the current construction environment; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the proposed revisions of the Parks Design & Construction Standards, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville that the 2025 Parks Design & Construction Standards, effective July 1, 2025, is hereby adopted.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of __________________________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
___________________________
City Clerk

Page 900 of 1881 ends

Parks Design & Construction
Standards
July 2025 Edition
316 Vernon Street, Suite 400
Roseville, California 95678
www.roseville.ca.us
In order to ensure the most up-to-date version,
hard copies of the Buildings & Grounds Section
is provided as a supplemental. In all cases, the
Buildings & Grounds Section is considered a part
of these Parks Construction Standards.

Page 901 of 1881 ends
Page 902 of 1881 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.

PREFACE
The purpose of these construction standards is to set a minimum standard to be applied to the design and construction of park and streetscape projects within the City of Roseville. These standards are intended to apply to City-generated projects as well as Developer-generated (“Turn-Key”) projects. To maintain a standard level of consistency, these requirements shall be applied by all Consultants, Developers, and Contractors.

Standard Construction Practice methodology has been applied to the creation of these standards. It is difficult to anticipate all situations, which may require the use of these standards, therefore, modifications, on a case-by-case basis, may be necessary.

Proposed changes shall be reviewed by the Parks, Recreation & Libraries department prior to any modifications. These standards are not intended to replace federal, state, or local codes.

This document is organized into six sections:
 The first section discusses design guidelines and expectations.  The second section outlines construction document preparation, Developer responsibilities for “Turn-Key” projects and inspection requirements.  The third section references the City of Roseville’s General Conditions for Buildings and Grounds. (See supplemental)
 The fourth section includes the Park’s standard for technical specifications, section numbers, and formatting. These specification sections make up the “backbone” of the specification package. Additional information and specifications sections will and should be added by the Consultant to ensure that all project parameters are included in the final package. The City of Roseville Department of Public Works Design and Construction Standards is referenced as it applies to the type of work required to be performed.
 The fifth section contains the standard forms that would apply to each construction project.
 Lastly, the sixth section contains the standard details typically used in a park project.

These details are those that can and should be standardized. Additional details specific to the project are to be prepared by the Consultant and included in the contract documents.

Page 903 of 1881 ends
Page 904 of 1881 ends

PARKS CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS
Table of Contents
Section 1: Design Guidelines
City Department Key Contacts
Roseville Parks & Recreation Values
Section 1A : Design Preliminaries
Section 1B : Design Development
Section 2: Construction Documents
Construction Documents for Parks
Construction Documents for Streetscapes
Section 3: General Conditions for Building and Grounds
Refer to Supplemental Publication
Section 4: Technical Specifications
i: Table of Contents
Section 00 31 46: Permits
Section 01 10 00: Summary of Work
Section 01 57 23: Storm Water Pollution Control
Section 03 30 00: Site Concrete
Section 04 20 00: Unit Masonry
Section 05 12 00: Structural and Misc. Steel
Section 09 91 00: Painting and Finishes
Section 12 93 00: Site Furnishings
Section 26 00 00: Site Electrical
Section 31 10 00: Clearing and Grubbing
Section 31 20 00: Earthwork
Section 32 12 16: Asphalt Concrete Paving
Section 32 15 40: Decomposed Granite Paving
Section 32 31 13: Chain Link Fencing
Section 32 32 19: Modular Concrete Retaining Walls
Section 32 84 00: Irrigation System
Section 32 90 00: Planting
Section 33 00 00: Utilities
Section 5: Forms & Quality Expectations
Application and Certificate for Payment
Continuation Sheet
Request for Field Instruction
Change Order
Project Schedule Sample
Submittal Summary
Park Improvement Inspection Card
Streetscape Inspection Card
Irrigation Color Schematic Requirements
Water Audit (Process and Checklist)
Cue Cards and Expectation Tri-folds
Section 6: Details

Page 905 of 1881 ends
Page 906 of 1881 ends

Section 1:

DESIGN GUIDELINES
Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department

Page 907 of 1881 ends
Page 908 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department Section 1: Design Guidelines

Page 1 of 1 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.

City Departmental Key Contacts
Department Phone Number (916)
Parks & Recreation,
Park Development
772-PLAY (7529)
Development Services,
Building Division
(Structural)
774-5332
Electric 797-6937
Inspection Line
(Structural, Plumbing &
Electrical)
Schedule online at the
Online Permitting Services
(OPS) portal
Development Services,
Engineering Division
(Right-of-way Improvements
& SWPPP)
746-1300
Environmental Utilities 774-5770
Planning 774-5276
Permit Center Open to public:

M-F 8 a.m. - 4 p.m. at
311 Vernon Street

Page 909 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department Section 1: Design Guidelines

Page 1 of 1 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.

Roseville Parks, Recreation & Libraries Values
Parks, Recreation & Libraries Mission
To enhance lives and the community by providing exceptional experiences.

Parks, Recreation & Libraries Vision
To be the leader in creating a healthy community through progressive, sustainable & memorable experiences.

Parks, Recreation & Libraries Values
• Diversity & Inclusion
• Fun & Celebration
• Integrity
• Respect
• Sustainability
• Excellence
• Innovation
• Learning
• Safety
• Teamwork
Values in Our Partners (Consultants, Contractors, Developers, Others) • Responsiveness
• Creative and Innovative
• Quality
• Problem-solvers
• Teamwork
• Fiscally Responsible
• Timeliness
• Human Design Bias
• Place-making orientation
• Learners-Teachers
• High Tech-High Touch
• Honesty and Ethics
The focus in all projects should be creating areas for social interaction for people oriented experiences/outcomes. Each space should offer, at minimum, an opportunity to learn and grow, interact and be social through a variety of positive active/programmed and passive/self-directed activities, which are aesthetically pleasing and are welcoming, safe, clean and green.

Page 910 of 1881 ends

Section 1A:

DESIGN PRELIMINARIES
Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department

Page 911 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation, & Libraries Department Section 1A: Design Preliminaries

Page 1 of 16 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.

Design Guidelines and Preferred Materials Checklist
These guidelines do not replace adopted Specific Plan Design Guidelines for landscape medians and street frontages. These Specific Plan Design Guidelines also contain conceptual guidance for improved park amenities. For all master plans, the proposed design shall include elements outlined in the adopted Specific Plan to the extent possible.

Grading
 Do not grade turfed slopes greater than 4:1 (25%) as it cannot be easily mowed. If possible, provide a 60” minimum flat bench at top of slope.  Crown playing fields such as baseball, softball, and soccer, should be between 1.5% and2%.
 Consider spectator areas when grading the play field sidelines. Provide adequate level areas for spectator seating.
 Provide for a not-to-exceed 2% cross slope on walkways, unless it can be demonstrated that compliance of the 2% cross slope negatively impacts the usability of the park.  Longitudinal slopes on walks may vary when necessary given the site-specific terrain.

Do not exceed 20:1 (5%) without providing handrails per the ADA regulations and the California Title 24 Building Code.
 Ensure compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), California Title 24 Building Code (Title 24) and minimize the need for handrails whenever possible.  Hard court surfaces shall be graded at 1%.
 Obtain the current standard notes for grading from the Development Services Engineering Division. These can be found online.
 Comply with the City of Roseville Oak Tree Ordinance.  Slopes greater than 3:1 are not permitted. If unavoidable circumstances arise during construction, a solution for future erosion of bark and soils must be provided for all slopes greater than 3:1. A drainage plan showing a constructed drainage solution must be provided. An example is to place drain inlets at point discharges and a swale two feet from back of walk. Approval of the proposed drainage solution must be obtained from the Parks and Recreation Department prior to installation.

Drainage
 Confirm and indicate depth of storm drain stub.
 Locate all clean-outs OUTSIDE of the play area, within planting or turf.  Provide a combination system using a main drain inlet and a perforated pipe (in a drain rock filled trench) drainage system to capture long runs or isolated areas within the play area. Slope subgrade to drain inlets. Locate drainage so that it does not conflict with play equipment.
 Do not locate drains within or immediately adjacent to a play field.  Do not use drop inlets smaller than sixteen inches (16”) square or diameter for landscape areas and twenty-four inches (24”) minimum for all other areas. Drop inlets shall be concrete.
 Refer to Parks Standard Construction Details, Development Services’ Design and Construction Standards, and Roseville Electric’s Commerical Specifications. Ensure the plan reference is to the most recent edition.
 For swales in planted or turf areas, ensure a minimum slope of 2%. Avoid swales in turf whenever possible.

Page 912 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation, & Libraries Department Section 1A: Design Preliminaries

Page 2 of 16 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.  Do not sheet drain from planted or landscape areas across hardscape.  Manholes shall be per the Development Services Design and Construction Standards.  For storm drain stubs to future phases of work, cap or install a riser above the silt line.  Do not place drains within the Oak tree canopy.

Sewer
 Indicate sewer stub, depth of stub and proposed pipe routing.  If Park has a drinking fountain only, 2” SDR sewer pipe may be used. For Parks with restroom facilities, VCP pipe is required.
 If phased, indicate future manholes.

Chain Link Fencing
 Where fencing is related to a specific facility, i.e. tennis courts, pickleball, etc., install black vinyl coated fabric, posts and fittings, and windscreens (color to be selected by City), whenever budget allows.

Site Furniture
 Do not specify wood furniture.
 Site furnishings shall be surface mounted, unless otherwise approved by project manager.
 All site features, including planter and sound walls shall be sealed with two coats of antigraffiti sealant in compliance with the Development Services Design and Construction Standards. Site furniture, i.e. benches, picnic tables, etc. shall be coated with anti-graffiti finishes.
 Planters, seat walls and retaining walls shall be designed to prevent skateboarding.

This shall be an integral part of the overall design. Third party “add-ons” shall be prohibited.
 Colors “to be selected by the City”. Select furniture that provides compatible colors with the play components.
 Provide a two-foot (2’) clearance between hardscape edges and site furnishings.  Provide a minimum four-foot (4’) clearance between picnic tables or other obstructions on a minimum of one side for each table.

Page 913 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation, & Libraries Department Section 1A: Design Preliminaries

Page 3 of 16 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.

Preferred Materials List
(While materials and equipment are listed as preferred, it shall be understood to include “or accepted equal” as stipulated in the standard specifications.)
Description Model # Manufacturer Distributor Comments
Backstops
(Permanent)
Obtain preferred
configuration from project
manager
Ball Field Mix
60/40 red
lava and
clay loam
Cascade Rock
916-383-1300
or accepted equal.

Basketball
Courts
Concrete with fiber mesh
or asphalt if budget does
not allow for concrete.

Basketball
Goals
1513-26-44
#29
backboard
perimeter
Patterson
Williams
Miracle Play
Group
(916) 317-0545
6’ offset, #35 net and #44
goal, #26 ¼” rectangular
heavy-duty solid steel,
powder-coated backboard
with #29 perimeter, lifetime
warranty. Dual post
Benches
Standard
Bench
(with or
without
back) or
Pedestal
Bench
MyTCoat All About Play
(916) 923-2180
Punched Steel, Standard
Industry Coating, surface
mount, or accepted equal.

Bike Racks
WBR-700 L.A. Steelcraft
Products
Ross Recreation
(916) 985-6349 7’ loop (ribbon-style), 2-
3/8” O.D Powder coated
Loop style, powder coated
709 Miracle or accepted equal.

Bollard Per PK Detail
Chain Link
Fencing
Standard 9
gauge
fabric
At play courts, all parts (i.e.
posts, fabric, fittings) black
vinyl coated, unless
otherwise accepted.

Booster Pump V-Power
Equipment, Inc. (888) 830-8025 Sizes required by irrigation system or accepted equal.

Water Feature
Controller Water Odyssey
Sizes required by water
play features or accepted
equal.

Page 914 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation, & Libraries Department Section 1A: Design Preliminaries

Page 4 of 16 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.

Preferred Materials List
(While materials and equipment are listed as preferred, it shall be understood to include “or accepted equal” as stipulated in the standard specifications.)
Description Model # Manufacturer Distributor Comments
Drinking
Fountains #10145 SM Most Dependable Fountains (800) 821-9838 Bottle filler, dual bowl
and accessible. Include
recessed hose bib with
locking cover, and
external stainless steel
surface mount carrier.

Jug fillers to be added at
field complexes with 2 or
more fields. All drinking
fountains to connect to
sanitary sewer lines
where feasible
Light Pole
RT34-16 DE

BLK TXT
30-30
Whatley
16’ nominal mounting
height, round tapered,
direct burial pole.

Finish: Black, textured.

Lights
(Security/
Pathway)
Whenever possible,
match existing
streetlights and use an
LED fixture
Park
Identification
Sign
Outdoor Creations
Inc.
(530) 365-6106
Concrete
Park
Namesake Bio
Sign
KVO Industries,
Inc. (707) 573-6868 Information provided by City.

Playground
Rules Sign
Gopher Sign
Company (651) 698-5095 Or accepted equal
Picnic Tables
Rectangular
Independent
Pedestal
Table
Or, Square
Pedestal
Table
MyTCoat All About Play
(916) 923-2180
Punched steel, Industry
Standard Coating,
surface mount, or
accepted equal.

Specified tables shall
not have umbrella holes.

Garbage Cans
Due to recent changes
in waste management
regulation, contact
project manager for
preferred models.

Tennis Court
Posts/Net 2205 Patterson Williams
Miracle Play
Group
(916) 317-0545
3” sq. posts, black vinyl
coated, removable brass
tension handle. Heavy
duty net or accepted
equal.

Page 915 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation, & Libraries Department Section 1A: Design Preliminaries

Page 5 of 16 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.

Preferred Materials List
(While materials and equipment are listed as preferred, it shall be understood to include “or accepted equal” as stipulated in the standard specifications.)
Description Model # Manufacturer Distributor Comments
Volleyball Posts 2219-20 Patterson
Williams
Miracle Play
Group
(916) 317-0545
4” O.D. posts, 11’-6”
long w/fixed eyelets,
self- securing rope
clamp, 4” stainless
steel cable option or
accepted equal.

Volleyball Net PBN4 Volleyballusa.com
Volleyball Sand #1 Masonry
Sand
Hasties Capitol
Sand & Gravel (916) 989-4600
Softball/Baseball
Bases and
Pitching Rubber
10355
Enduro
Bury-In Home
Plate
Tomark Sports
(800) 959-1844
1/field
10390 Step-Down
Pitching Rubber 2/field
10053 and
10050
Saf-T-Slider
Base with
Double First
Base
1 set/field
10225 Anchor Ground
Stakes 8 total/field
Pickleball Posts/
Net
PPR-10/
PT-21N Jaypro Sports Jeanette Lewis(925) 667-6862
Color selected by
City
Pickleball Court
Surfacing Plexipave California Sport Surfaces (978)623-9980 Consult with PM for color pattern Windscreen Tenn-Air Pro
Putterman
Athletics
(800) 621-0146
Attach using hog
rings, color to be
selected by City

Page 916 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation, & Libraries Department Section 1A: Design Preliminaries

Page 6 of 16 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.

Play Areas
 Containment curb elevations/finish grades should be level on all sides.  Provide a minimum of three inches (3”) between the finish surface of engineered wood fiber and the top of curb/wall/or other. Ensure the 3” is at compaction/settling.  Include as a part of the design “Age Appropriate” stickers visibly displayed on the equipment indicating the age range of the user in which the designed play structure is intended.
 Include as a part of the design the location of a “Playground Rules” sign indicating expectations for playground behavior and supervision. See standard details for sign design.
 Orient the transfer deck to relate directly to the play area entry. Provide an access ramp in compliance with the latest ADA regulations, Consumer Product Safety  Commission (CPSC) Guidelines, and American Standards, Testing and Materials (ASTM). Comply with all applicable laws.
 Separate the swing area from the active play area to avoid conflicts in play circulation. Separation should be physical.
 Tot play areas should be physically separate from the school-aged structure and swings.
 Provide an eight foot (8’) distance use zone between the play component and the play area containment edge. Show and label on the plans.  Do not overlap use zones, unless accepted in applicable regulations/codes. Use zones shall remain in compliance with accepted standards and requirements.  Do not include “Super Scoops” or similar type sand scoop play components.  Do not include rubber tile in the play design.
 Site play area for safe play and easy viewing from the street or parking lot.  Sand, if used for play and is not within a use zone, shall be #1 masonry sand as produced by Hasties Sand & Gravel, Roseville, California or equal.  Colors of the play components “to be selected by the City”.

Irrigation
 Confirm and indicate depth of water stubs.
 Recycled Water Systems: See City Environmental Utilities Department (EU).  Irrigation Pressure Calculations and Watering Schedules  Pressure loss calculations must consider utilizing a minimum of two and up to 4 valves concurrently equaling the largest system demand.  Pressure loss calculations must consider the longest run and the largest demand based on gallons per minute.
 Pressure loss calculations shall consider static water pressure at build-out.  Watering schedules should consider a finite watering of nine hours per day. The maintenance watering schedule should ensure that the entire system associated with each controller shall meet the nine hour window per day. Watering various areas within a system for seven days a week does not meet the nine hour per watering day criteria.
 The goal of the irrigation system is to provide maximum flexibility to the system in cases where pressure losses are greater than originally estimated, new valves must

Page 917 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation, & Libraries Department Section 1A: Design Preliminaries

Page 7 of 16 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027. be added to the system or other long term needs to ensure a healthy, thriving landscaped/turf area.
 Refer to the Development Services Design and Construction Standards for selected/accepted backflow prevention device.
 Comply with the state Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance.  Meter
 The meter shall be a part of the construction contract. Meters must be purchased through the City (EU).
 The water service connection (if not previously provided) shall be installed with the project. The actual water tap shall be performed by the City (EU). Costs for installation shall be part of the contract.
 Backflow Preventers (BFP)
 The BFP to be installed by the contractor. All costs of installation is the responsibility of the contractor.
 Size BFP the same size as the meter.
 Type shall be accepted by EU.
 Provide a lockable and removable insulation cover.
 Master Valve
 For systems with one master valve, use a normally open master valve.  For systems with two master valves, the smaller master valve shall be normally open and the larger master valve shall be normally closed.  Install master valve in valve box below grade.
 Flow Meters
 Utilize preferred ultrasonic flow meter that can capture maximum flow and minimum flow for the system.
 Refer to Calsense design guidelines for proper sizing. Use Calsense “Recommend Range”.
 Controller
 Install one antenna for every controller.
 Controllers for irrigation shall be Calsense and wired one (1) valve per output.

Communications shall be via a customized cellular configuration using a combination of Calsense and third-party components per the Technical Specifications.
 Piping
 Locate mainline as close to hardscape edges as possible.  Do not pipe full and part or quarter turf rotor heads on the same valve, unless matched-precipitation nozzles are available and applied.  Sleeve all wiring and waterlines under paving and supply a spare sleeve, same size as largest, capped at both ends under roadways. Mark sleeves with ball markers.
 Pipe sprinkler heads following grade contours.
 Automatic Control Valves
 The total number of turf heads per valve and GPM flow rate shall not exceed 75% maximum flow rate of the backflow as measured on the downstream side of the backflow.

Page 918 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation, & Libraries Department Section 1A: Design Preliminaries

Page 8 of 16 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.  All valves shall be per the Technical Specifications with ball valves on the inlet side, or approved equal.
 Zones (Valves) GPM should be matched so that when (the maximum number of) combined (largest valves) in a single program line they will operate close to or equal to the POC (mainline size) assigned maximum GPM. Combine 2 or more turf valves not to exceed MAX POC.
 Reclaimed Valves shall be standard valve with purple handle for reclaimed water designation – no scrubber valves.
 Water Window: 9 p.m. to 6 a.m. for reclaimed water. (9 hours)  Water Window: 9 p.m. to 6 a.m. for potable water. (9 hours)  Water Window: Sports Complex with Lights 11 p.m. to 6 a.m. (7 hours)  When using turf block or cells, design irrigation within these areas to be separate from adjacent areas for ease of operations.
 Valves shall be zoned according to hydrozone requirements. Trees shall be on separate bubbler zones.
 Sprinkler Heads
 When recycled water is used, avoid direct spray onto picnic tables, benches & drinking fountains.
 Discuss head layout concepts with Project Manager prior to design. Heads shall be spaced to achieve maximum Distribution Uniformity (DU) and designed to the middle nozzle or middle of nozzle range to allow for maximum adjustability.

Sprinkler head layout should include throw pattern as part of the irrigation plan on the 75% submittal. Throw patterns should be hatched. 99% and beyond, throw patterns can be hidden.
 For turf areas wider than 20 feet:
o use Rainbird, 8000 or 5500 series
o use stainless steel riser
o use risers 5” or taller.
o use pressure regulators in heads
 For turf areas less than 20 feet wide:
o use Rainbird R-VAN nozzles
o use Rainbird 1800 P45 or Hunter PROS-PRS40 series body o use 6” pop-up height
o use pressure regulators in heads
o use built-in check valve where needed to prevent low head drainage.  For mulched planter areas, use sub-surface inline drip or point-source drip / bubblers, depending on planting density. See Section 4 – Technical Specifications for drip equipment specifications.
 Design systems with deep water bubblers to all trees. Tree bubblers shall be on a separate valve from other plantings.
 Design irrigation zones large enough to see flow on controller independently.  Provide quick couplers at 300’ on center. Provide potable connection at drinking fountain and picnic area locations.
 Other
 Comply with the State’s Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance.

Page 919 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation, & Libraries Department Section 1A: Design Preliminaries

Page 9 of 16 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.  Provide a complete water table outlining water needs per valve by month for a twelve-month period. The water table shall be included in the project manual as a part of the specifications (appendix) or on the plans.  Provide a complete watering schedule per valve. The watering schedule shall be included in the project manual as a part of the specifications (appendix) or on the plans with expected precipitation rates per valve. The schedule shall list the area (in sq ft) that is irrigated by that valve.
 All Consultants shall utilize the attached irrigation legend shown in Section 1B for standardization of symbols for commonly used equipment.  Do not irrigate within the tree canopy of existing Oak trees.  Points of connection, valves, gate valves, meters, and backflows shall be line size unless specifically approved by the Parks Department.  All swing joint components shall be the same size as the inlet of the sprinkler head to be connected.
 Install a mow band to separate City maintained landscape areas from private maintained landscape areas for streetscapes.
 Install a mow band to separate irrigation systems that use potable water from irrigation systems that use recycled water for streetscapes.  Install a mow band to delineate the end of a recycled mainline and the start of a different recycled mainline for streetscapes.
 Recycled water signs shall be at park entrances only.  No planter area shall be less than 4’ wide at its minimum width.  Baseball/softball infield irrigation: (See PK Details)  Install a minimum of four (4) rotors on all infields; refer to standard details. Use Falcon 6500 heads. Set heads a minimum of four inches (4”) and a maximum of six inches (6”) into the turf from the infield edge.  Set infield rotors a minimum of four inches (4”) and a maximum of six inches (6”) away from backboards or hardscape.
 Install a brass manual irrigation valve after the RCV to turn on the infield line.  Infield watering must be connected to potable water supply. Ensure there is adequate pressure to operate valves not using a booster pump.

Landscape Standards
 It should be noted that each specific plan area was carefully planned to create a unique aesthetic using plant material as a key component to achieve the aesthetic goals of the area. Selected plant material should consider the original goals outlined in the design guidelines specific to each plan area.
 Overall Landscape Concepts must:
 Meet Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (WELO) goals for water conservation,
 Ensure diversity in trees, shrubs and groundcovers.
 Include a mix of seasonal color/flowers (no annuals);  Consider location for height of plants at maturity
 Against buildings/walls: taller plants against wall with layers of descending heights toward the front of planter with groundcover or sub shrubs in front 6" or lower at maturity;

Page 920 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation, & Libraries Department Section 1A: Design Preliminaries

Page 10 of 16 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.  In the open (planters with sidewalks on both sides, pathway one side/turf on other, streetscape medians, etc.): taller plants in the center with descending mature heights toward both edges and groundcover or sub shrubs at outer edges (6" or lower);
 On berms taller than 2' from finish grade: sub shrubs or groundcover (6" or lower) only (total height with plantings at maturity to be 30" or less unless berm is existing);
 Avoid use of woody stemmed shrubs;
 Consider walk-on turf alternatives (low groundcover-types);  Use perennials to add color, but ensure evergreen are dominant in the planters.
 Evergreens to provide mix of texture, leaf color and proven longevity;  Focus on water conserving plants and not natives, succulents or water thirsty plants;
 Use multiple types of trees, shrubs and groundcovers (avoid designs that utilize only one tree, one shrub and one groundcover species);  Consider nursery availability when selecting plant varieties, especially with patented cultivars that may have limited distribution;
 Review and contrast specific plan design guidelines with plant material noted in the Parks Construction Standards and current master gardeners/national nursery associations’ plant cultivation advances
Additional notes for Landscaping for Parks
 Designs of parks shall maximize use of water-wise plants to the extent possible.

Turf shall be designed for functional use for recreational purposes. Design should not include non-functional turf areas.
 Where space allows, provide tree groupings in groves rather than in singles or rows in equal intervals, unless the design dictates the need.  Refer to Preferred Tree List for tree species to match planter widths. Locate trees in center of planted areas and not in a straight row.
 Provide an eight-foot (8’) minimum clearance between trees and other site improvements, including shrubs.
 Provide an entry planted (non turf) area to locate the park identification sign.

Provide three to five (3-5) carpet roses to accent the sign. See City Project Manager for specific type. Locate adjacent to and/or behind the sign so as not to impede visibility of the sign from the road.
 Refer to the list provided for preferred trees. Selected trees shall fulfill the following criteria:
 For all areas with drains, do not plant trees within 12’ of the drain, whenever possible.
 Be appropriate to the site specific environment;
 Tolerates heavy soil conditions;
 Tolerates freeze;
 Tolerates high salt from recycled water, where recycled water is utilized for irrigation;
 Is considered disease and pest resistant;

Page 921 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation, & Libraries Department Section 1A: Design Preliminaries

Page 11 of 16 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.  Is known to have a deep rooting system (not shallow rooted) and  Tolerates heat (is not susceptible to sunburn).
 Tree species, which are known for shallow root systems may be considered acceptable if located within a planted area and/or planted with root barrier panels.
 When providing tree cut outs within hardscape, provide a five-foot (5’) diameter round or square cut out. When budgets allow, include tree grates.  Planting sizes shall be:
o 15 gallon for trees
o 5 gallon for shrubs
o 1 gallon for vines, selected shrubs and groundcovers
o Size variations to be accepted by the City.
 Medium to large trees shall be spaced no closer than 25’ on center.  Trees shall be planted no closer than 15’ to any light fixture or structure.  Landscape plans shall draw all plantings, including trees at the mature widths.  Plants shall be located away from edge of pavement equal to the radius of the shrub at maturity, plus one foot. (E.g., a shrub that will grow to a 4’ width at maturity shall be placed no closer than 3’ from edge of pavement.)  Berms shall not exceed 30” in height. This shall include plant material at maturity.  Obtain a soils fertility test and report and include amendment recommendations as a part of improvement plans/construction documents.
 For trees located within open space or natural areas, install drain tiles within the plant basin.
 The application of recycled mulches may be considered on a specific case-bycase basis in compliance with SB1383’s Recovered Organic Waste Product Procurement Targets. Discuss suitability with project manager.

Additional Notes for Landscaping for Streetscapes
 Grading & Drainage
 Berms shall not exceed 30” in height. This shall include plant material at maturity.  Slopes greater than 3:1 are not permitted. If unavoidable circumstances arise during construction, a solution for future erosion of bark and soils must be provided for all slopes greater than 3:1.
 A drainage plan showing a constructed drainage solution must be provided.

Approval of the proposed drainage solution must be obtained from the Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department prior to installation.  Streetscapes shall not solely rely on surface drainage to address run-off issues.

Hard pipe or other designed drainage systems shall be included in all design solutions.
 Run-off shall be collected and satisfactorily addressed in order to avoid excessive water on sidewalks and/or bike trails.
 Landscaping
 Tree and plant selection shall be consistent with the specific plan design guidelines AND these Parks Construction Standards.
 In addition to the original goals of the specific plan, consideration related to major arterials and collector streets that cross specific plan areas or that stretches for

Page 922 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation, & Libraries Department Section 1A: Design Preliminaries

Page 12 of 16 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027. long lengths should consider continuity of the plantings. This can be achieved in many ways:
o Consistent street tree choices;
o Groupings of a common tree species throughout the length of the road;
o Use of a common shrubs and groundcover in groupings;
o Specialty paving in the noses and crossings that convey continuity.  All landscape plans shall show sight distance triangles (to be confirmed by the project engineer), signs, streets lights, utility boxes, fire hydrants and any other appurtenances that will affect landscape and irrigation installation.  Plantings within the sight distance triangles shall be no taller than 12” at mature height.
 For unsignalized left turn lanes, landscaping shall be no taller than 12” at mature height for a distance of 175’ as measured from the nose of the median.  Trees in medians to be in two rows and offset to avoid a visual "picket fence" effect.
 Obtain a soils fertility test and report and include as a part of improvement plans/construction documents.
 A soils fertility test shall also be obtained by the contractor and submitted for review prior to adding soil amendments. The soils fertility test shall include recommendations for amendments.
 Irrigation
 A master irrigation plan shall be developed, submitted and approved with the first phase of sub-phase of a development plan set.
o The master irrigation plan shall show mainlines and sizes (gallons per minute and pressure), separate point of connections and sizes for each sub-phase, controller sizes, sleeves sizes and locations and valve sizes and locations.
o Once approved, the master irrigation plan shall be included with each subsequent phase of sub-phased improvement plans.
o Also, approved sleeve locations shall be reflected on the civil plans.  All plans must include a separation of City maintained irrigation and privately maintained irrigation for all irrigation areas shown on the plans. Separation of services includes but is not limited to the following: water meter, backflows, main line, lateral lines, valves, sprinkler layout, drip lines and all other irrigation related items.
 City maintained irrigation lines, including the main line must not be constructed in privately maintained landscape areas or private property. The separation of City maintained irrigation and privately maintained irrigation must be easily identified on the plans to receive plan approval.
 If the plans do not contain any City maintained irrigation a note stating this must be shown on each sheet containing irrigation plans.
 Comply with the State’s Model Efficient Landscape Water Ordinance.  All equipment and components of the irrigation system shall be consistent to these Parks Construction Standards. No substitutions are allowed, unless specifically approved.

Page 923 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation, & Libraries Department Section 1A: Design Preliminaries

Page 13 of 16 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.  Points of connection, valves, gate valves, meters, and backflows shall be line size unless specifically approved by the Parks Department.  For streetscapes, booster pumps are not considered a solution to address low pressure concerns and shall not be used.
 All swing joint components shall be the same size as the inlet of the sprinkler head to be connected.
 Master valve shall be Superior.
 Place mainline in parkway strip if planter is 10’ or wider. Otherwise, place mainline in 2’ bench at back of walk.
 Areas where width is 4’ – 6’ (such as tapered noses of medians) should remain unirrigated and unplanted, mulched only. Under 4’ should be paved.  On-Site Amenities
 Entry monuments and signs shall be designed to include monolithic signage or lettering that is connected as one component. Single lettering is prohibited. All signs and lettering shall be bolted in place and must be flush against surface.

Use of epoxy only is prohibited.
 All plans must include a physical separation, such as a concrete mow band between City maintained landscape and privately maintained landscape. The separation of City maintained landscape and privately maintained landscape must be easily identified on the plans to receive plan approval. If the plans do not contain any City maintained landscape areas a note stating this must be shown on each sheet containing landscape plans.
 Selected stone veneer or stonework shall be available on a long-term basis to ensure future repair work will provide consistency in aesthetics. All veneer shall be grouted in place.
 Accent lighting shall be above-ground, up-light fixtures, or set in the entry walls.

Use LED bulbs. All fixtures shall be readily available, with a realistic lead-time for replacement orders. No fixture shall be placed in turf areas.  Planters and seat walls 4’ high and lower with adjacent pavement or hardscape shall be designed to include skate deterrents as an integral part of the wall cap design. Third party add-on products such as “Skate Block” are prohibited.

Flatwork
 Concrete
 Standard walkway finish shall be medium broom finish, unless identified as a special paving area.
 Provide at least one path of travel to all major amenities within the park design where the concrete pathway is at least ten feet (10’) wide for use by service vehicles. All curves within this route shall contain curves no smaller than ten feet (10’) in radius.
 Concrete mow bands, and concrete collars around light fixtures in turf areas shall be per PK Details, unless otherwise accepted.
 Concrete pads for light fixtures, benches, picnic tables or other site furnishings shall use 45-degree (or similar) angles rather than 90-degree angles.

Page 924 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation, & Libraries Department Section 1A: Design Preliminaries

Page 14 of 16 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.  Concrete pathways and other standard flatwork applications, shall be installed with fiber mesh at a (concrete section) depth of five inches (5”). Do not include welded wire mesh or rebar, unless otherwise accepted.
 Install barbeques within decomposed granite. Barbeques shall not be installed within plantings areas or within the concrete picnic pad.  Color shall be integral.
 Asphalt Concrete Bike Paths
 Bike paths shall be a minimum of ten-feet (10’) wide with a two-foot (2’) wide AB shoulder on one side and a two-foot (2’) wide decomposed granite shoulder on the other side of the path (for joggers/pedestrians) as shown in Development Services Construction detail BK-1 and BK-2.
 Bike path access shall be protected from private vehicle traffic through the use of collapsible bollards, stationary bollards, boulders and post and cable fencing.  Bike paths that serve as fire access lanes to wild land environments must have a minimum turning radius of twenty-two feet (22’) inside diameter and thirty-two feet (32’) outside diameter. The bike path shall be capable of supporting a minimum GVW of 30,000 pounds.
 Other AC paving (including parking lots) shall be per Development Services Construction Standards.

 For additional bike trail construction requirements, see Development Services Design and Construction Standards.
 Decomposed Granite (DG) Paving
 Do not install DG in areas, which exceed a longitudinal slope greater than 3%.  Provide a cross slope not-to-exceed 2%.
 Install per PK Detail.
 Header
 Install per PK Detail.
 Install at both edges of AC or DG pathways within developed park boundaries.

Required edging on open space trails shall be determined on a case-by-case basis.

Post & Cable Fencing
 Install per PK Detail.
 Fire access points through the post and cable assembly shall be provided at a maximum interval of 750 feet. The cable crossing the fire access point shall be yellow, plastic coated cable in order to delineate the access points. The ends of the access point cable shall be secured to the posts in a similar fashion as the terminal post anchor, with the exception of adding a City of Roseville padlock connecting each end of the cable to the eyebolt.

Restrooms
 See approved master Comfort Station plans provided by City

Page 925 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation, & Libraries Department Section 1A: Design Preliminaries

Page 15 of 16 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.

Pre-Fabricated and/or Proprietary Structures
 Consult with the Building Department for requirements for structural calculations.

Some items may be accepted as a deferred submittal; deferred submittals not permitted without written consent of Project Manager. Determination shall be included in the Design Development submittal to the City. o Exceptions: EV charging stations
 Bridges that serve as fire access lanes to wild land environments shall be constructed to allow for twelve feet (12’) clear width, capable of supporting a minimum GVW of 30,000 pounds and shall allow a straight-line approach of a minimum of thirty-five feet (35’), unless otherwise approved by the Fire Department.  Submit structural calculations wet signed by a California licensed structural engineer.
 Submit shop drawings as a part of the construction submittal process.

Site Electrical
 Include security lighting as directed by the Project Manager. Discuss with Project Manager whether or not to locate an outdoor GFI dual outlet, weatherproof, vandalresistant cover in all group picnic areas. Mounting shall be mounted flush at top of post near roof.
 Metered service panels and service points shall be approved by the Electric Department. Where questions arise regarding acceptable standards, contact the Electric Department directly.
 Playing field lights shall be operated by a Musco control link system or accepted equal.
 Restrooms shall be on a separate circuit.
 Outlets flushed with wall.
 Lighting to be strategically place near gathering areas and play structures for ease of police surveillance.

Neighborhood Park Design Criteria
Design
 Each park is to create a different look, theme or contain an element not already used in other City of Roseville parks.
 Comply with the current Parks Construction Standards.  Elements to include, but not limited to:
 Usable/turf for purposes of recreation
 Maximize water-wise landscape areas where non-functional turf has traditionally been placed.
 Design for one hour stay and play value
 One school-aged children’s play area
 One to two bay swings (2 – 4 actual swings)
 Four and up picnic tables under a shaded shelter
 Two – three picnic tables scattered within the park
 Benches

Page 926 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation, & Libraries Department Section 1A: Design Preliminaries

Page 16 of 16 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.  Concrete pathways
 Service access for maintenance to the picnic and play area  ADA accessibility throughout
 One to two security lights
 One drinking fountain
 One park identification sign
Open Space Standards
 Provide a 10’ clearance between toe of slopes and open space fencing/barriers for maintenance access
 Provide a master access plan for open space within a plan area to strategically identify access points for maintenance access into the open space  All wetlands shall be flagged and fenced using orange construction fencing prior to start of any clearing and grading operations
 Slopes onto the open space shall be 3:1 maximum
 For landscapes adjacent to open space, use only native, non-invasive plantings  Irrigation in landscaped areas adjacent to open space shall be designed to avoid all over-spray
 Over-grading onto Open Space shall be avoided
 Increased run-off due to new development on adjacent property shall be avoided or shall be collected into a piped storm drain system and conveyed to an acceptable receiving water. Daylighting onto Open Space is prohibited.

Page 927 of 1881 ends
Page 928 of 1881 ends

Section 1B:

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department

Page 929 of 1881 ends
Page 930 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department Section 1B: Design Development

Page 1 of 6 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.

Preferred Tree List
The following list includes the Department’s preferred tree species. Additional species may be suggested by the Consultant, which will be considered during the 75% construction document submittal phase of work. Refer to the specific plan’s design guidelines for additional information. Trees contained within the specific plan guidelines may be excepted due the maintenance concerns.

Planting sizes to be 15 gallon. Variations in size shall be approved by the City.

Symbol Notes Description Symbol Notes Description Symbol Notes Description Symbol Notes Description A Accent Tree W Wildlife Friendly M Moderate 🗸🗸 Yes
D Deciduous, Dormant X Toxic, Poisonous H High
E Evergreen VL Very Low T Tall, Height
F Flowering L Low S Spread, Width

PREFERRED TREE PLANT PALETTE
Botanical Name Common Name Size WUCOLS
Region 2
(OPALS)
Allergen
Reclaimed
Water
Tolerance
Locally
Native
Suitable
for Turf
Planting
Notes
Small Trees (Less Than 15’) for Landscape Areas 4’ in Width and Larger, Suitable for Planting under Power Lines Acca sellowiana Pineapple Guava 15’T x 12’S L 3 L E,F
Cercis occidentalis ‘Oklahoma’ Oklahoma Redbud 12’T x 12’S VL 4 M A,D,F,W Cotinus coggygria ‘Royal Purple’ ‘Royal Purple’ Smoke Tree 15’T x 12’S L -- M D Heteromeles arbutifolia Toyon 12’T x 12’S VL 3 H 🗸🗸 E,F,W Lagerstroemia ‘Tuskegee’ Pink Flower Crape Myrtle 15’T x 18’S L 5 L A,D,F,W Photinia fraseri Red-Leaf Photinia 15’T x 10’S M 4 M E,W Medium Trees (15’ – 40’) for Landscape Areas 6’ in Width and Larger Acer buergerianum Trident Maple 25’T x 25’S M 6 M D
Acer campestre Hedge Maple 35’T x 30’S M 6 M 🗸🗸 D,W
Acer ginnala ‘Flame’ Flame Maple 20’T x 20’S M 4 -- D
Acer griseum Paperbark Maple 25’T x 20’S M 6 -- 🗸🗸 D
Acer neguno Box Elder 30’T x 25’S M F1/M10 -- 🗸🗸 D
Acer tataricum ginnala Amur Maple 20’T x 20’S M 5 -- D

Page 931 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department Section 1B: Design Development

Page 2 of 6 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.

Arbutus unedo Strawberry Tree 20’T x 20’S M 3 H E,F
Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud 20’T x 25’S VL 4 L A,D,F,W Chionanthus retusus Chinese Fringe Tree 25’T x 25’S M F1/M8 H D,F Crataegus laevigata English Hawthorn 25’T x 20’S M 3 M E Geijera parviflora Australian Willow 35’T x 20’S M 5 H E,W Gleditsia triacan. ‘Rubylace’ ‘Rubylace Honey Locust 30’T x 25’S L F1/M7 H 🗸🗸 D,F Koelreuteria bipinnata Golden Flame Tree 35’T x 25’S M -- -- D,F Koelreuteria paniculata Golden Rain Tree 25’T x 30’S M 4 H D,F Laburnum anagyroides Golden Chain Tree 25’T x 20’S M 7 -- D,F Lagerstroemia ‘Muskogee’ Pink Flower Crape Myrtle 25’T x 12’S L 5 L A,D,F,W Lagerstroemia ‘Natchez’ White Flower Crape Myrtle 25’T x 12’S L 5 L A,D,F,W Laurus nobilis Sweet Bay Laurel 30’T x 30’S L 1 H E,W
Magnolia s. ‘Alexandrina’ Alexander Magnolia 25’T x 25’S M 4 -- D,F Malus x ‘Prairifire’ Crabapple ‘Prairifire’ 20’T x 20’S M 4 L 🗸🗸 A,D,F,W Parkinsonia aculeata Palo Verde Tree 25’T x 25’S VL 5 H D,F,W Prunus caroliniana Carolina Cherry Laurel 30’T x 20’S L 6 M E,F Searsia lancea (Rhus lancea) African Sumac 20’T x20’S L 8 H E,W Styrax japonicas Japanese Snowball 30’T x 20’S M 4 -- 🗸🗸 D,F Styrax obassia Fragrant Snowball 30’T x 20’S -- 4 -- 🗸🗸 D,F,W Syringa reticulata Japanese Lilac 35’T x 30’S M 6 M A,D,F Ulmus propinqua ‘JFS-Bieberich’ Emerald Sunshine Elm 35’T x 25’S M 9 M 🗸🗸 D,W Umbellularia californica California Bay 40’T x 15’S M 6 -- 🗸🗸 E,W Vitex agnus-castus Chaste Tree 25’T x 20’S L 4 M A,D,F
Zelkova serrata ‘Wireless’ Japanese Zelkova ‘Wireless’ 25’T x 40’S M 8 M D Large Tree (40’ – 60’) for Landscape Areas 8’ in Width and Larger Aesculus hippocastanum Horse Chestnut 60’T x 50’S M 7 L 🗸🗸 D,F,W Acer rubrum ‘October Glory’ October Glory Maple 50’T x 40’S M 1 L 🗸🗸 D,W Acer rubrum ‘Franksred’ Red Sunset Maple 45’T x 30’S M 1 L 🗸🗸 D,W Carpinus betulus European Hornbeam 40’T x 25’S M 7 -- 🗸🗸 D Celtis occidentalis Common Hackberry 60’T x 50’S L 7 L 🗸🗸 D,W Nyssa sylvatica Sour Gum 50’T x 25’S M 8 M D,W
Pistacia chinensis Chinese Pistachio 50’T x 50’S L 8 M 🗸🗸 D Styphnolobium japonicum Japanese Pagoda 50’T x 40’S L -- H 🗸🗸 D Ulmus davidiana ‘Morton’ Accolade Elm 50’T x 35’S M 9 -- 🗸🗸 D

Page 932 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department Section 1B: Design Development

Page 3 of 6 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.

Zelkova serrata Japanese Zelkova 50’T x 50’S M 8 M 🗸🗸 D Very Large Tree (Greater Than 60’) for Landscape Areas 12’ in Width and Larger Cedrus atlantica Atlas Cedar 70’T x 40’S M 2 M 🗸🗸 E
Cedrus deodara Deodar Cedar 70’T x 40’S L 6 H 🗸🗸 E,W
Magnolia grandiflora Southern Magnolia 80’T x 50’S M 5 L 🗸🗸 E,F Platanus racemosa California Sycamore 60’T x 50’S M 8 H 🗸🗸 🗸🗸 D Platanus x hispanica London Plane Tree 60’T x 50’S M 8 H 🗸🗸 D Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak 60’T x 60’S VL 9 H E,W Quercus douglasii Blue Oak 70’T x 30’S L 9 -- 🗸🗸 D,W
Quercus ilex Holly Oak 50’T x 50’S L 9 H E,W
Quercus kelloggi California Black Oak 60’T x 60’S L 9 -- 🗸🗸 D,W Quercus lobata Valley Oak 80’T x 80’S L 8 M 🗸🗸 D,W
Quercus suber Cork Oak 50’T x 50’S L 9 M 🗸🗸 E,W
Quercus virginiana Southern Live Oak 60’T x 45’S M 9 H E,W Quercus wislizenii Interior Live Oak 60’T x 50’S L 9 -- 🗸🗸 E,W

APPROVED SHRUBS, GRASSES, GROUNDCOVERS AND VINES PLANT PALLETTE Botanical Name Common Name Size WUCOLS
Region 2
(OPALS)
Allergen
Reclaimed
Water Friendly
Locally
Native
Notes
Low Growth Shrubbery (1’ – 2’ Tall) for Landscape Areas 4’ in Width and Larger Baccharis pilularis Dwarf Coyote Brush 2’T x 6’S L F1/M9 H E,W Epilobium canum California Fuchsia 2’T x 4’S L 6 H 🗸🗸 D,F,W Erigeron karvinskianus Santa Barbara Daisy 1’T x 2’S L 4 H E,F,W Gaura lindheimeri Gaura 2’T x 2’S M 2 M E,F,W
Gazania hybrids Clumping Gazania 0.5’T x 1’S M 4 H E,F,W Grevillea ‘Mt. Tamboritha’ ‘Mt. Tamboritha’ Grevilla 2’T x 4’S L 5 M E,F Mahonia repens Creeping Oregon Grape 2’T x 4’S L 2 L 🗸🗸 E,F,W Nandina domestica ‘Harbour Dwarf’ ‘Harbour Dwarf’ Nandina 2’T x 3’S L 1 L E Nepeta x faassenii Catmint 1’T x 2’S L 2 H D,F,W
Rhaphiolepis indica ‘Ballerina’ ‘Ballerina’ Hawthorne 2’T x 4’S L 3 H E,F,W Salvia chamaedryoides Mexican Blue Sage 2’T x 4’S L 4 -- E,F,R,W Spirea japonica ‘Goldmound’ Goldmound Spirea 3’T x 4’S M 5 M D,F,W

Page 933 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department Section 1B: Design Development

Page 4 of 6 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.

Teucrium chamaedrys Dwarf Germander 1’T x 2’S L -- M E,F,W Viburnum davidii David Viburnum 3’T x 4’S M 5 L E,F
Medium Growth Shrubbery (3’ – 6’ Tall) for Landscape Areas 4’ in Width and Larger Berberis t. ‘Atropurpurea’ Red Leaf Japanese Barberry 4’T x 4’S M 3 L D,W Callistemon viminalis ‘Little Johns’ Little John’s Bottlebrush 3’T x 3’S L 9 H E,F,W Ceanothus gloriosus ‘Yankee Point’ Wild Lilac ‘Yankee Point’ 3’T x 8’S L 4 H E,F,W Ceanothus maritimus ‘Valley Violet’ ‘Valley Violet’ Ceanothus 4’T x 4’S L 3 H E,F,W Ceanothus thyrsiflorus ‘Skylark’ Skylark Ceanothus 5’T x 5’S L 3 H E,F,W Cistus x hydridus White Rockrose 4’T x 6’S L 3 H E,F,R,W Cistus x purpureus Orchid Rockrose 4’T x 4’S L 3 H E,F,R,W Coleonema pulchellum ‘Sunset Gold’ Golden Breath of Heaven 4’T x 5’S M 4 H E,F Forsythia x intermedia ‘Kolgold’ Gold Forsythia 5’T x 4’S L 6 M D,F,W Frangula californica ‘Mound San Bruno’ Mound San Bruno Coffeeberry 6’T x 6’S L -- -- E,F,W Grevillea x 'Noellii' Noell Grevillea 4’T x 5’S L 5 M E,F,W Hesperaloe parviflora Red Yucca 3’T x 3’S L 1 H E,F
Leucadendron 'Jester' Jester Conebush 4’T x 4’S L 4 L E Leucophyllum frutesens ‘Compacta’ Compact Texas Ranger 5’T x 5’S L 2 H E,F,W Loropetalum ‘Rubrum’ Chinese Fringe Flower Rubrum 5’T x 5’S M 4 M E,F Myrtus communis ‘Compacta’ Dwarf Myrtle 3’T x 3’S L 5 H E,F,W Nandina domestica ‘Gulf Stream’ Gulf Stream Nandina 3’T x 3’S L 1 L E,W Olea europea ‘Little Ollie’ Little Ollie Olive 6’T x 6’S VL 10 H E Pinus mugo var. pumilio Dwarf Mugo Pine 5’T x 6’S L 4 H E Pittosporum tobira ‘Wheeler’s Dwarf’ Wheeler’s Dwarf Pittosporum 4’T x 4’S M F1/M7 H E Punica granatum 'Nana' Dwarf Pomegranate 3’T x 3’S L 2 M D,F,W Rhaphiolepis ‘minor’ ‘Dwarf Yedda’ Hawthorne 5’T x 5’S L 3 M E,F,W Rosemarinus ‘Tuscan Blue’ Tuscan Blue Rosemary 6’T x 2’S L 4 H E,F,W Saliva greggii Autumn Sage 3’T x 3’S L 4 H E,F,R,W
Saliva microphylla Red Sage 3’T x 3’S L 4 -- E,F,R,W
Teucrium fruticans ‘Compactum’ Dwarf Bush Germander 3’T x 3’S L 2 H E,F,W Westringia fruticosa ‘Morning Light’ Coast Rosemary 3’T x 3’S L 2 H E,F Groundcovers (Less Than 2’ Tall) for Landscape Areas 4’ in Width and Larger Acacia redolens ‘Low Boy’ Prostrate Acacia 2’T x 10’S VL 8 H E Arctostaphylos ‘Emerald Carpet’ ‘Emerald Carpet’ Manzanita 1’T x 5’S M 2 H E,W Cotoneaster dammeri ‘Lowfast’ Bearberry ‘Lowfast’ 1’T x 8’S L 3 M E,F,W Juniperus procumbens ‘Nana’ Dwarf Garden Juniper 1’T x 6’S L -- H E Juniperus sabina ‘Buffalo’ ‘Buffalo’ Juniper 1’T x 6’S L 1 H E

Page 934 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department Section 1B: Design Development

Page 5 of 6 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.

Lantana montevidensis Trailing Lantana 2’T x 6’S L 2 H D,F,W Myoporum parvfolium ‘Putah Creek’ ‘Putah Creek’ Myoporum 0.5’T x 8’S L 2 H 🗸🗸 E Rosa x ‘Noatraum’ Pink Carpet Rose 2’T x 3’S L -- M D,F,W Trachelospermum asiaticum Asian Jasmine 2’T x 10’S M 5 M E,F Ornamental Grasses (Less Than 3’ Tall) for Landscape Areas 4’ in Width and Larger Calamagrostis x acutiflora ‘Karl Forrester’ Feather Reed 2’T x 2’S L -- H D,W Carex divulsa European Gray Sedge 1’T x 1’S L 8 M E
Carex pansa Meadow Sedge 1’T x 1.5’S M 8 -- 🗸🗸 E
Carex praegracillis California Field Sedge 1’T x 2’S M -- -- 🗸🗸 E Carex tumulicola Berkeley Sedge 1.5’T x 2’S L -- -- 🗸🗸 E Chondropetalum tectorum Cape Rush 3’T x 4’S L -- H E,W
Dianella caerulea Flax Lily 2’T x 2’S L 3 H E,F
Dianella revoluta ‘Baby Bliss’ ‘Baby Blue’ Flax Lily 1.5’T x 1.5’S L 3 -- E,F Dianella revoluta ‘Little Rev’ ‘Little Rev’ Flax Lily 2’T x 2’S L 3 -- E,F Dietes bicolor Butterfly Iris 3’T x 3’S L 2 M E,F
Festuca glauca Blue Fescue 1’T x 1’S L 6 M E
Festuca mairei Atlas Fescue 2’T x 2’S L 6 H D
Hemerocallis x hybrids Evergreen Daylily 2’T x 2’S M 6 H E,F,R,W Hemerocallis x ‘Stella de Oro’ ‘Stella de Oro’ Daylily 2’T x 2’S M 6 H D,F,R,W Juncus patens California Gray Rush 2’T x 2’S M -- H 🗸🗸 E,W Kniphofia spp. Red Hot Poker 2’T x 1’S L 4 M E,F,R
Liriope muscri cvs. Big Blue Lily Turf 1’T x 1’S M 3 M E,F,R Lomandra ‘Breeze’ Dwarf Mat Rush 2’T x 3’S L 7 H E
Melinus nervigumis Rubygrass 2’T x 2’S M -- -- D
Muhlenbergia capillaris Pink Muhly Grass 3’T x 3’S L -- H D,W Muhlenbergia rigens Deer Grass 3’T x 3’S L -- H 🗸🗸 D,W
Pennisetum ‘Little Bunny’ ‘Little Bunny’ Fountain Grass 1’T x 1’S L 8 H D,W Tulbaghia violacea Society Garlic 1’T x 1’S L 5 M E,F,W Tulbaghia violacea ‘Silver Lace’ ‘Silver Lace’ Society Garlic 1’T x 1’S L 5 M E,F,W Vines, for Landscape Areas 18” in Width and Larger
Clytosoma callistegioides Lavender Trumpet Vine Spreading M 2 -- E,F,W Ficus pumila Creeping Fig Spreading M -- H E
Parthenocissus tricuspidata Boston Ivy Spreading M 4 L D

Page 935 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department Section 1B: Design Development

Page 6 of 6 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.

Not To Be Planted Within 20' of Any Infrastructure and Not to be Planted on Roseville City Property - Species have invasive root systems and create major hardscape damages
Silver Maple Acer saccharinum
Tree-of-Heaven Ailanthus altissima
Mimosa / Silk Tree Albizia julibrissin
White Alder Alnus rhombifolia
Modesto Ash Fraxinus velutina 'Modesto'
Glossy Privet Ligustrum lucidum
American Sweet Gum Liquidambar styraciflua
Mulberry family Morus species
Grey Pine/Foothill Pine Pinus sabiniana
Locust family Robinia species
Willow family Salix species
Cottonwood family Populus species
Chinese Hackberry Celtis sinensis
Chinese Tallow Tree Sapium sebiferum

Page 936 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department Section 1B: Design Development

Page 1 of 6 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.

Standard Symbols for the Irrigation Legend
Pressure Mainline, Schedule 40 PVC, size as noted on
the plans. (Bold and distinctly different from other
graphic lines).

Non-pressurized Lateral Lines, Schedule 40 PVC, size
as noted on the plans. (Do not use pipe smaller than
¾”).

Schedule 40 PVC Sleeve under pavement per Parks
Standard detail PK-4.

Point of Connection (Label static water pressure and
gallons per minute available at POC).

Meter (Note size, type and for which line type it
applies).

Backflow Prevention Device (Note size, type and City
standard detail).

Flow Sensor per Parks Standard detail PK-2 (Note
size, and model #).

Calsense (V.2) (Note # of stations). Install inside
enclosure. See Specifications.

Gate/Ball Valves per Parks Standard detail PK-11 or
PK-12. (Note size, model #, manufacturer).

Quick Coupler Valve, Rainbird 44RC per Parks
Standard detail PK-14. (Note size).

Electric Remote Control Valve, size as noted on plans.
(Note type, model # and precipitation rate).

Pop-Up Rotor (Note nozzle size, radius, gpm and psi).

Other sprinkler heads (Note type, model, radius, gpm
and psi. Use triangular, circular and square shapes, in that order).

RCV Valve Labeling Symbol (Include Station number,
gpm and valve size).

Page 937 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department Section 1B: Design Development

Page 2 of 6 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.

Standard Irrigation Schedule – Sample

Page 938 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department Section 1B: Design Development

Page 3 of 6 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.

Design Development Standards
Upon Approval of Master Plan, Prepare Design Development Documents  Use of 24” x 36” size sheets is preferred. The first sheet shall be the Title Sheet and shall include only the following items:
 Vicinity Map
 Sheet Index
 Project Title, including address
 Consultant/Sub-consultant Names, Addresses and Phone Numbers  Professional Stamp with Name, License Number and Expiration Date clearly marked.
 Signature Block for the Development Services Department, City Engineer, Date.
 2” x 2” box for Development Services (Engineering and Building) stamp plans upon approval.
 List of Special Inspections
 List of Deferred Submittals, if applicable
 Description of the base bid and bid alternates
 Description of park acreage, disturbed area and cut/fill  Do not place general plan notes on this sheet. If space is available, these general notes shall be placed on the appropriate sheet to which the notes apply.
 The second plan sheet shall be a Scope of Work Sheet. This sheet shall be an overall base plan identifying all types of construction including in project using textures and labels all bid alternates and, if the project is to be phased, a sheet which clearly delineates the various park elements to be constructed under this contract by use of textures and labels.
 Provide the following individual plan sheets, as required for a complete set of working drawings:
 Demolition (Use topographic survey, existing trees, wetlands, water courses, other natural features, existing utilities and stubs and other pertinent information as a part of the base map).
 Grading & Drainage (These two sheets can be combined or separated depending on the amount of information which needs to be conveyed. If separate, include drain inlet elevations on grading sheet. Also include existing topographic information overlaid in a 35% halftone or CAD equivalent). For grading, ensure to show existing contours and new contours.
 Erosion Control sheet is for reference only and to facilitate preparation of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Include the following note “The SWPPP shall be implemented and monitored by the contractor and shall be a “living document” reflecting the status of construction work as it progresses.”

Page 939 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department Section 1B: Design Development

Page 4 of 6 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.  Staking & Reference (Include roadway stationing, if applicable; and existing street improvements, including streetlights, transformers, fire hydrants, and water storm drain and sewer stubs.)
 Irrigation
 Planting (show proposed trees and shrubs/groundcover on one plan sheet.

Include tree permit conditions and notes, if applicable.)  Landscape Details
 Other Details
 Other trades’ sheets
o The plan scale shall be no smaller than 1” = 30’, preferably 1” = 20’, unless otherwise approved. All plan sheets shall be drawn at the same scale and the north arrows shall be oriented in the same direction from sheet to sheet.

If designing a large park site that does not fit on the plan sheet, work with Project Manager to determine appropriate sheet scale and match lines to clearly show project scope and minimize the number of match lines for ease of reading.

Specifications
 Use track changes to show modifications from template language  Revise Table of Contents as needed.
 Cover sheet shall be provided by the City, unless it is a turn-key project.  Review basic sections provided, edit to reflect project needs.  (First draft submittal shall show strikeouts and redlines. Do not delete shaded paragraphs until final version.) Non shaded paragraphs cannot be modified, only paragraphs that are shaded should contain revisions.  Insert additional sections to reflect project needs consistent with format provided. (Modifications shall be Microsoft Word, Latest edition, compatible, Arial font, 12 pt. Indicate all new sections.)
 Specifications shall be prepared and provided in 8-1/2” x 11” booklet form.  The provision of these specifications does not relieve the Consultant of his/her responsibility to provide detailed and complete contract documents.

Design Development 75% Completion
The purpose of this submittal is to refine design, select materials and address site issues.
(Note: Design Refinement and Materials Selection can occur before 75% submittal. A submittal is required for Parks internal review and comment.

Provide electronic pdf plans which includes, at minimum):
 100% complete Grading Plan with cut and fill calculations and drainage calculations (per City of Roseville Development Services Design & Construction Standards, latest edition). Indicating number import, export or a balanced project. Calculations shall take into account all spoils from underground utilities, hardscape, and play area excavations.  100% complete Drainage Plan. (See #1 comment above and confirm underground stubs/utilities.)

Page 940 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department Section 1B: Design Development

Page 5 of 6 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.  Partial Construction/Staking and Reference Plan indicating materials and detail references.
 Electrical Plan showing light location, POC and size of transformer.

Irrigation Plan showing complete mainline layout with gate valves shown, head layout, controller type and location, sprinkler head type (e.g. model number, manufacturer name, gpm, psi and radius in feet), point of connection location and the static water pressure at the point of  connection. For projects where the subdivision has not yet been built, indicate the projected static water pressure at build-out. Include a separate Irrigation exhibit showing head layout with spray arc patterns to demonstrate coverage. Do not include piping on the exhibit. Planting Plan, including a plant list, soils analysis report (report to be consistent with test recommendations per Section 32 90 00- Planting, 1.06), a delineation of turf and groundcover areas, and tree locations.
 75% of the construction details, including references to the City Standards by detail number.
 Determination of any deferred items have been identified and discussed with Building Department and noted on the plans.
 Updated estimate of probable costs.
 Checklist requirements

Page 941 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department Section 1B: Design Development

Page 6 of 6 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.

Design Development Completion Checklist
Project Name ___________________ Reviewed By: _________________ Date: __/___/___ Grading
 Cut and fill calculations provided and addressed on plans.  Playfield and courts sloped per Design Guidelines.
 Adequate level space provided at play fields for spectators.  Walkways comply with ADA.
 Berms do not exceed 30” in height.

Drainage
 Design complies with Design Guidelines, including drainage calculations.

Site Improvements
 Layout of all site improvements are clearly shown on base map, including:
 Fencing
 Drinking Fountains
 Site Furniture (benches, picnic tables, etc.)
 Pavement by type
 Poured-in-place items, i.e. seat wall, retaining walls, concrete curbs, mow bands, etc.  Hard Court Surfaces
 Overhead Structures
 Buildings
 Layout of improvements does not create unsafe conditions or conflict with adjacent uses.  Layout complies with Design Guidelines.
 Proposal of unique construction materials and deferred submittal items are clearly shown. (Further discussion may be necessary).

Play Area
 Drainage and layout complies with Design Guidelines.
 Use zones are clearly marked and do not overlap, except between spring toys.  A clear path of travel from the play area entrance to the transfer deck is shown in the most direct route.
 The swing area is visually and/or physically separated.  At least one belt swing has an accessible non-friable play surface beneath connected to an accessible pathway.

Irrigation
 Sprinkler head layout is shown.
 Controller type and location is shown.
 Sprinkler types and models are listed.
 Point of connection and static water pressure (current and projected) is listed.  Separate sprinkler head layout exhibit with spray arc patterns.

Planting
 A preliminary plant list is provided.
 Species shown on the list comply with Design Guidelines.  Trees are shown and turf/groundcover areas are delineated.

Page 942 of 1881 ends

Section 2:

CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department

Page 943 of 1881 ends
Page 944 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department Section 2: Construction Documents

Page 1 of 9 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.

Standard Construction Document Preparation Checklist for Parks Construction Documents Review and Approval Process 99% Completion (City – wide plan review)
 Plans: City-wide plan review of 99% complete Plans occurs through the Online Permitting Services (OPS) Portal and Electronic Plan Review system.

Plans and other technical documents must comply with the document submittal requirements outlined by the City of Roseville Development Services Department.
o Upon completion of the documents for submittal, Consultant to provide the Project Manager with the electronic files for upload to the OPS Portal.  Specifications: Provide the redlined / strike-out version of the specifications to Project Manager for review..
 Consultant to add appendices to the Technical Specifications that should include the soils fertility, chemistry, and texture testing lab report, permits (other than City permits), geotechnical report (if necessary), and the environmental document (if mitigation is required) . City shall provide permits, geotechnical report, and environmental documents to the Consultant, as needed for the specific project.
 Estimate: Include an Estimate of Probable Costs for the entire project, and a separate estimate including the items pertaining to the Building (BD) permit (accessible paving, site furnishings, shade structures, restrooms, etc.) Construction Documents 100% Completion
 Upon receipt of City comments, Consultant to revise the plans and specifications and provide written responses to each City Department’s comments indicating where the changes have been made within the contract documents.
 Consultant to resubmit plans and specifications (100%) to the Project Manager for resubmittal into the OPs Portal. Written responses to the plan check comments will be included in the City-wide resubmittal.  Consultant to provide Utility Composite (CAD) drawing, which are required by Environmental Utilities at this stage.

Page 945 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department Section 2: Construction Documents

Page 2 of 9 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.

Approved Plans and Specifications
 After all departments have approved the construction documents, Consultant to submit to the Project Manager the complete set of plans in AutoCAD 2018 or higher format.

Page 946 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department Section 2: Construction Documents

Page 3 of 9 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.

Park Plan Requirement Checklist for Construction Documents (For Use by Consultant prior to submitting plans to the City)
Date:

To:

CC:

Project:

CWJ#: EN# BD#
Plans submitted to the City for review and approval must contain the following components. Provide checklist with plan submittals:

COVER SHEET
Project Name and Address
CWJ# is noted on the top right-hand corner of the plan sheet Landscape Architect Seal
Vicinity Map
Signature Block
Sheet Index
Codes Reference
Reference to date specific Parks Construction Standards Cut and fill calculations are provided
Deferred submittals and add alternates are listed
Each sheet is clearly labeled
Index of items specifically under Building Dept. review

SCOPE OF WORK PLAN
Street lights and roadways are shown.

Limit of work line is shown
Match lines are shown
ADA routes are indicated
City of Roseville Public Improvement and Tree Preservation Notes are clearly labeled.

Proposed driveways, sidewalks, access points/ramps and right-of-way improvements shown

EROSION CONTROL PLAN
Plan is provided

GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN
Storm drain tie-ins are shown
Drainage systems are shown.

Contour lines are shown, both existing and future
Percentage of slope is shown on all sidewalks, concrete, planter areas, etc.

Height of walls, curbs and finish grade elevations are shown.

Legend is shown.

UTILITY PLAN
Sewer and Domestic Water Tie-ins are shown
Domestic Water Meter and Backflow are shown.

Page 947 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department Section 2: Construction Documents

Page 4 of 9 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.

Sewer and Domestic Water Lines are shown

LAYOUT & REFERENCE (CONSTRUCTION) PLAN
Plan is provided.

CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
Play structure components are labeled and safety zones are shown.

Construction details are provided.

Standards Construction details are shown with Department Head signature or referenced.

IRRIGATION PLAN & DETAILS
Recycled and/or Potable water connection, irrigation point of connection (POC), meters, backflows and types of waterlines are clearly labeled.

Water tie-ins are shown
Irrigation main line layout and the size are clearly labeled Sprinkler head and valve layout is shown.

Gallons per minute (GPM) is ________ and is shown.

Pounds per square inch (PSI) is ________ and is shown.

Irrigation legend is provided.

Watering schedule is provided.

Controller type is ______________________________________ and the location is shown.

Standard Irrigation details are shown with Department Head signature or referenced.

Backflow/connection details comply with Development Services Standards.

LANDSCAPE PLAN & DETAILS
Plant list is provided.

Tree and shrub locations are shown and turf/groundcover areas are delineated.

Standard Planting details are shown with Department Head signature or referenced.

Park identification sign includes grouping of roses at base of sign.

ELECTRICAL PLAN
Electrical point of connection is shown.

Available amperage is ___________ and is shown.

Light locations and types are located and labeled.

One-line diagram is provided.

Load calculations, voltage, phase, size of main service and location of metered pedestal are shown.

STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS (Building, lights, fences over 6’ high, walls over 4’ high) Construction details are shown.

As an authorized representative of ____________________ (firm/company), I have reviewed and verified that the submitted plans contain all of the required items listed above.

Signature Date
Print Name Print Firm/Company

Page 948 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department Section 2: Construction Documents

Page 5 of 9 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.

Process for Developer Generated “Turn-Key” Park Projects

Page 949 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department Section 2: Construction Documents

Page 6 of 9 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.

Step The Developer shall….. The City shall….
1 Contact Parks, Recreation & Libraries,
Park Development Division Manager to
set up a meeting to review project and
process. Include the proposed
construction budget and schedule for
design, construction document
preparation, and construction.

Meet with the Developer to review
the project including: process,
design criteria, construction budget
and schedule.
2 Execute Park Development Agreement
between the City and the Developer(s).
(Template available upon request.)
Facilitate the creation of the Park
Development Agreement. Staff to
take Agreement to City Council for
approval.
3 Provide a list of Landscape Architects
under consideration to design the park
and to provide construction documents
for the project. Landscape Architect must
have had previous park design
experience, a valid Calif. Landscape
Architect license, and have local
experience. Submit a statement of
qualifications, and an example of fullscale construction drawings to the City for review and approval.

Review submitted materials and
provide input. Make
recommendations towards the
selection of the Landscape
Architects and related Consultants
based on their qualifications,
references and experience.
4 Notify the City of who the recommended
Landscape Architect is, prior to award of
their contract and start of their work.

Approve selection of Landscape
Architect and related Consultants.
5 Download a copy or provide a link of the
Parks Construction Standards, which
include park design guidelines for use by
the Consultant and City Improvement
Construction Standards through
Development Services.

Provide a link to the Park
Construction Standards.
6 Submit to the City a Conceptual Park
Plan and an estimate of probable costs,
based on the approved specific plan
concept and budget, for review and input.

Review and provide input on the
submitted plan.
7 Revise the submitted plan, based on City
input, for completion of the Final Master
Plan. Submit a digital file of the color
rendering and a revised estimate of
probable costs.

Upon receipt of the final master
plan, take proposed plan to Parks
and Recreation Commission.

Page 950 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department Section 2: Construction Documents

Page 7 of 9 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.

Step The Developer shall….. The City shall….
8 Developer is responsible for any required
permits, and additional environmental
clearances (if needed) for project. Based
on the completed master plan design,
contact the City’s Environmental
Coordinator for environmental review and
determination of requirements and/or
clearances. (Generally, if the park design
is consistent with the specific plan
concept, no additional environmental
work is required. The Environmental
Coordinator will make the final
determination of required CEQA
documentation.)
9 Submit final master plan with approved
environmental documentation and final
cost estimate to City for final approval by
City Council.

Take the final master plan with
environmental determination to the
City Council for approval.
10 Provide construction documents based
on the Parks Construction Standards,
and applicable City Improvement
Standards, at Design Development (30%
and 75%) and 99% completion. At
Design Development completion, provide
electronic plan files as outlined in the
Design Development Section of these
Standards. At 99% completion and prior
to citywide review, submit complete sets
of plans, permit applications, draft
specifications consistent with the
Construction Document Section of these
Standards to the Project Manager for
submittal to the Online Portal Services
system. An estimate of fees will be
calculated by Development Services and
will need to be paid by the Developer in
order to cover City plan review,
GIS/mapping and inspection costs.

Unspent balances of the deposit will be
returned to the Developer upon
completion of the warrantee period.

Review the construction documents
at Design Development and 99%
completion. At 99% completion,
coordinate plan review with other
City departments through the citywide review process.

Page 951 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department Section 2: Construction Documents

Page 8 of 9 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.

Step The Developer shall….. The City shall….
11 Revise and resubmit to the Parks,
Recreation & Libraries Department
contact the construction documents to
reflect City comments. At 100% provide
written responses to each City comment
indicating where in the documents the
response to the comment is located.

After all Departments have approved the
construction documents, submit the bid
package (see next page)
Assist in obtaining City approvals of
the bid package.
12 Upon receipt of approved plans, obtain
list of pre-qualified contractors from City.

Certain subcontractor trades are included
in pre-qualifications.

Provide pre-qualified
contractors/subcontractors’ list.
13 Solicit bids for the construction of the
project utilizing the pre-qualified
contractors list.
14 Upon receipt of bids, provide the City with
the results of the bid. Make
recommendations for selection of the
contractor and value engineering items, if
necessary.

Review and approve bid
recommendation. (Value
engineering may be necessary if
bids are over budget.)
15 Upon City approval, register selected
contractor with the Department of
Industrial Relations, outlining scope of
work included in the contract, and
proceed with the construction of the
project. Notify the City’s liaison of the
Pre-construction meeting and submit a
construction schedule at that time.

All applicable City Dept’s to
participate in the Pre-construction
meeting and ongoing inspections as
required.
16 Obtain all applicable City permits,
including, but not limited to, grading,
drainage, encroachment, building and
tree permits. Maintain all inspection cards
including Parks inspection card on site to
be signed off by inspectors at the time of
each inspection.

Provide Parks inspection card.
17 Submit electronic versions of project
submittals for review and approval by the
City.

Review and stamp submittals.

Distribute to applicable City staff

Page 952 of 1881 ends

Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department Section 2: Construction Documents

Page 9 of 9 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.

Step The Developer shall….. The City shall….
17 (cont.)
and return electronic copy to
developer.
18 Developer to provide a professional
liaison (i.e. landscape architect or
construction manager) to monitor and
communicate with the City during the
progress of construction and any
changes which may need to be
considered due to site conditions or
other. This shall include the review of
any submittals and other shop drawings.

Participate in the on-site review,
submittal reviews, and inspections
of construction progress. Attend
routine construction meetings as
needed.
19 Conduct on-site reviews on a weekly
basis. Complete establishment period.

Conduct a Pre-final and Final site review.

Submit certification by landscape
architect that park is built according to
plans and specifications.

Participate in the Pre-final and Final
site review.
20 If a reimbursement is due, submit a
detailed cost summary with receipts or
approval forms to the City for review,
including approved change orders.

Meet with Developer to review final
cost summary. Based on agreed
cost, process reimbursement to the
Developer.
21 Coordinate a meeting with the City to
provide turn-over documents as outlined
in the Parks Standards.

Facilitate a meeting and collect all
turn-in items, including meter
numbers for transfer to City.
22 Submit the appropriate documentation for
the deeding of the improved park
property to the City for recordation.

Coordinate with the City Manager’s
Office.

Accept the project upon completion
of all of the following: formal
dedication by the developer, upon
satisfactory completion of the
project including the maintenance
period, and upon receipt of asbuilts. Utility Bills will be transferred to the City upon acceptance.
22 Celebrate with a dedication - Work with
City to plan.

Work with Developer to plan
dedication of park.
23 Respond on a timely basis to any repairs
under the one-year warranty.

Monitor warranty period and
request any repairs.
24 At end of warranty period, provide
balance remaining of deposit to
Developer.

Page 953 of 1881 ends

Parks and Recreation Department Section 2: Streetscape Construction Document and Plan Processing

Page 1 of 7 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.

Page 954 of 1881 ends

Parks and Recreation Department Section 2: Streetscape Construction Document and Plan Processing

Page 2 of 7 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.

Streetscape Construction Documents and Plan Processing
Streetscape Construction Document
Streetscapes General
Consultants must:
 List the square footages of turf areas and landscape areas individually (by valve number) within the irrigation sheets.
 Redwood header boards are not permitted. Utilize the 12” wide concrete mow bands per Parks Construction Standards.
 Include required notes on all plan sets:
 “All improvements shall comply with City of Roseville Parks Construction Standards, latest edition”.
 “Contact USA Alert (800) 642-2444 at least 48 hours prior to start of work.”  “A preconstruction meeting must be scheduled prior to construction commencement of any irrigation and/or landscaping.”
 Show accent lighting including model # and type on the plans. In-ground fixtures are not permitted. Lighting located within a turf area is not permitted. Use LED fixtures.
 Subdivision names on entry monuments shall be cast in place or monolithic and bolted. Epoxy placed lettering or logos are not permitted.  Seat/Planter walls and handrails shall be designed with skate deterrents as an integral part of the design. Third party add-on products such as “Skate Block” are prohibited.

Grading
 All plans shall include grading contours and drainage systems to show how site water is being surface and subsurface drained.
 All berms shall not exceed 30 inches in height; this shall include the height of plant material on the berm at maturity.
 Slopes of any landscaped areas greater than 2% shall locate the toe of slope two feet away from back of walk. The remaining two feet shall be a bench sloped at 2% away from the back of walk.

Irrigation
 Provide water/irrigation schedule on each irrigation plan consistent with requirements outlined in the City’s Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance.  The gallons per minute shall be included for all irrigation nozzles on the irrigation legend.
 Location and size of back flow preventer shall be shown. Provide a detail enlargement of the point of connection.
 Size of the meter, backflow and all valves shall be consistent with the size of the irrigation main line.
 #12 copper tracing wire is required along entire length of irrigation main line.

Page 955 of 1881 ends

Parks and Recreation Department Section 2: Streetscape Construction Document and Plan Processing

Page 3 of 7 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.  Reclaimed water notes shall state compliance with City of Roseville Development Services Design and Construction Standards. If utilizing an existing controller, specify its location and how many stations are available for use. Landscape architect shall verify existing controller conditions.
 All irrigation designs must comply with the City of Roseville Water Efficient Landscape (WELO) Ordinance.
 Do not design streetscapes using booster pumps.

Planting
 Planting and irrigation must be integrated so that like-water use plants are placed together in the same irrigation zone.
 Do not use “No Mow” fescue.
 Large trees shall not be used where planter or median strip widths are less than ten feet wide. Either remove the tree or replace with smaller variety. See Design Guidelines Section for trees specific to planter widths.  All plans shall include vehicle site distance triangles at all intersections and turn pockets. Site distance triangles shall be verified by the project engineer. No plantings which will grow taller than 12” in height at maturity shall be planted within the site distance triangles.
 All plan sets shall show fire hydrants, streets signs, street lights and underground utility easements. Planting shall avoid conflicts with these improvements.  Do not plant trees or shrubs in front of irrigation heads.

Page 956 of 1881 ends

Parks and Recreation Department Section 2: Streetscape Construction Document and Plan Processing

Page 4 of 7 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.

Streetscapes Plant Species Concern
Botanical Name Common Name Concerns Alternate Suggestion Agapanthus African Lily
Limit use, heat
and frost
sensitive
dwarf variety
Aquilegia formosa Western Columbine
Short lived
species, sun
and heat
sensitive
Phygelius x rectus
‘Winchester Fanfare’
or ‘Pink Elf’ or
‘African Queen’ or
‘Trewidden Pink’
Artemesia californica
‘Canyon Gray’ Trailing Sagebrush Prohibited in the specific plan Artemisia stellerana
‘Silver Brocade’ or
Lessingia filaginifolia
‘Silver Carpet’
Crataegus laevigata English Hawthorn Disease prone,
do not use
Acer buergeranum
‘Streetwise’
Hypericum
calycinum
Creeping St.

Johnswort
Do not use, this
species is
invasive
Teucrium
chamaedrys
‘Prostratum’ or
Gazania or Erigeron
‘Wayne Roderick’
Imperata cylindrical
‘Rubra’
Japanese Blood
Grass
Winter
dormancy, with
high water
requirements
Pennisetum
setaceum ‘rubrum’
Lupinus albifrons Silver Bush Lupine Short lived Teucrium fruticans ‘Compactum’
Mimulus aurantiacus Sticky Monkey
Flower
Brittle stems
and summer
dormant
Agastache ‘Apricot
Sunrise’ or
‘Tangerine Dreams’
or ‘Tutti-frutti’ (These
require good
drainage)
Platanus x acerifolia London Plane Tree
Limit use, do not
use in planters
less than 10’
wide
Pinus spp Pines Structurally
unsound
Rosmarinus
officinalis Rosemary
Collects trash
too rangy

Page 957 of 1881 ends

Parks and Recreation Department Section 2: Streetscape Construction Document and Plan Processing

Page 5 of 7 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.

Plan Approvals and Construction
 Plans approved more than two years prior to the start of construction shall comply with the current Parks Construction Standards and may require a new review at the time of construction.
 Contractor shall include Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department in the initial preconstruction meeting.  Due to the delay in time between the initial pre-construction meeting and landscape work, the Contractor shall call for a second pre-construction meeting with Parks, Recreation & Libraries prior to start of irrigation work. This includes any proposed impacts to existing irrigation systems already under City operations. The landscape subcontractor shall be in attendance.
 All streetscapes are required to be inspected by the City of Roseville Park Inspector at key milestones of the project. A construction inspection card specific to streetscapes will be presented at the preconstruction meeting and must be kept at the construction site at all times. The Inspector must approve and sign each construction milestone listed on the inspection card at the time of inspection.

Signing off of all phases/milestones at the end of the project is not permitted.

Page 958 of 1881 ends

Parks and Recreation Department Section 2: Streetscape Construction Document and Plan Processing

Page 6 of 7 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.

Street Landscape Plan Requirement Checklist (For use by the Consultant prior to submitting plans)
Date:

To:

CC:

Project:

CWJ#: EN# BD#
Plans submitted to the City for review and approval must contain the following components:

COVER SHEET
Project Name and Address
CWJ# is noted on the top right-hand corner of the plan sheet Architect or Engineer Seal
Vicinity Map (Context of the property is shown with adjacent land uses labeled.) Signature Block
Sheet Index
Reference to date specific Parks Construction Standards Individual square footage of turf areas and landscape areas are listed.

Each sheet is clearly labeled

GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN
Storm drain tie-ins are shown
Drainage systems are shown.

Contour lines are shown, both existing and future
Percentage of slope is shown on all sidewalks, concrete, planter areas, etc.

Height of walls, curbs and finish grade elevations are shown.

Legend is shown.

LAYOUT & REFERENCE (CONSTRUCTION) PLAN
Plan is provided.

Street lights and roadways are shown.

Limit of work line is shown
Match lines are shown
Proposed driveways, sidewalks, access points/ramps and right-of-way improvements are shown Major sewer, water and storm drain lines are shown.

Fire hydrants are shown

IRRIGATION PLAN & DETAILS
A master irrigation plan showing points of connections/sizes, sleeves/sizes, valves/sizes, mainline/sizes and controller locations shall be included in all phased plans sets.

Areas that are to be City maintained and privately maintained are clearly labeled.

Irrigation water point of connection (POC), meters, backflows and types of waterlines are clearly labeled.

Irrigation main line layout and the size are clearly labeled Sprinkler head and valve layout is shown.

Gallons per minute (GPM) is ________ and is shown.

Pounds per square inch (PSI) is ________ and is shown.

Page 959 of 1881 ends

Parks and Recreation Department Section 2: Streetscape Construction Document and Plan Processing

Page 7 of 7 ends

The next update to these standards will be in July 2027.

Irrigation legend is provided.

Watering schedule is provided.

Controller type is ______________________________________ and the location is shown.

Standard Irrigation details are shown with Department Head signature or referenced.

Backflow/connection details comply with Public Works Standards.

LANDSCAPE PLAN & DETAILS
Areas that are to be City maintained and privately maintained are clearly labeled.

Plant list/legend is provided and is consistent with the specific plan design guidelines and Parks Construction Standards.

Tree and shrub locations are shown and turf/groundcover areas are delineated.

Site distance triangles are shown.

Standard Planting details are shown with Department Head signature or referenced.

ELECTRICAL PLAN
Electrical point of connection is shown.

Available amperage is ___________ and is shown.

Light locations and types are located and labeled.

Load calculations, voltage, phase, size of main service and location of metered pedestal are shown.

STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS (Building, lights, fences over 6’ high, walls over 4’ high) Construction details are shown.

As an authorized representative of ____________________ (firm/company), I have reviewed and verified that the submitted plans contain all of the required items listed above.

Signature Date
Print Name Print Firm/Company

Page 960 of 1881 ends

Section 3:

CITY OF ROSEVILLE GENERAL CONDITIONS

FOR BUILDING AND GROUNDS
Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department
In order to ensure the most up-to-date version, hard copies of the Buildings & Grounds Section is provided as a supplemental. In all cases, the Buildings & Grounds Section is considered a part of these Parks Construction Standards.

Page 961 of 1881 ends
Page 962 of 1881 ends

Section 4:

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department

Page 963 of 1881 ends
Page 964 of 1881 ends

Project
Date
Table of Contents

Page 1 of 1 ends

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION 00 31 46 PERMITS
SECTION 01 10 00 SUMMARY OF WORK
SECTION 01 57 23 STORM WATER POLLUTION CONTROL
SECTION 03 30 00 SITE CONCRETE
SECTION 04 20 00 UNIT MASONRY (GENERAL)
SECTION 05 12 00 STRUCTURAL AND MISCELLANEOUS STEEL (GENERAL) SECTION 09 91 00 PAINTING AND FINISHES (GENERAL)
SECTION 12 93 00 SITE FURNISHINGS
SECTION 26 00 00 SITE ELECTRICAL
SECTION 31 10 00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING
SECTION 31 20 00 EARTHWORK
SECTION 32 12 16 ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVING
SECTION 32 15 40 DECOMPOSED GRANITE PAVING
SECTION 32 31 13 CHAIN LINK FENCING
SECTION 32 32 19 MODULAR CONCRETE RETAINING WALLS
SECTION 32 84 00 IRRIGATION SYSTEM
SECTION 32 90 00 PLANTING
SECTION 33 00 00 UTILITIES
Consultants to add new sections and/or edit existing sections as needed to reflect specific project needs. New sections shall be formatted to match those included in these standards.

APPENDICES
A: Irrigation Schedules # pages
B: Soils Fertility Report # pages
C: Permits (provided by the City/Project Owner) # pages D: Environmental Document (provided by the City/Project Owner) # pages E: Geotechnical Report (provided by the City/Project Owner) # pages Consultant to add or delete sections/appendices as they apply to specific project needs.

Items noted to be provided by the City shall be identified on a project by project basis.

Page 965 of 1881 ends
Page 966 of 1881 ends

Project
Date
Section 00 31 46: Permits

Page 1 of 2 ends

SECTION 00 31 46

PERMITS
PART 1 - GENERAL

1.01 General Requirements
A. The requirements set forth in the General Conditions shall be in addition to the standards provided herein.

B. The requirements set forth in the Supplemental Conditions shall be in addition to the standards provided herein.

C. The intent of this Section is to furnish bidders with the known list of required permits for the Work under the Contract Documents. Bidders should note the list is not necessarily complete and additional requirements may exist or arise.

1.02 Permits
A. The Contractor shall obtain copies of the following permits from the Project Manager. Copies of these shall be obtained prior to start of work and shall be kept on the jobsite.

1. State Water Resources Control Board General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity.

2. City of Roseville Department of Development Services, Improvement Plan Permit for all Work related to this project.

3. City of Roseville Department of Development Services, Building Permit for all structural items associated with this project, including, but not limited to, lighting, backstops, restrooms, shade structures, drinking fountain (plumbing code), and miscellaneous electrical.

4. California Department of Fish & Game, Section 1601 Streambed Alteration Agreement: Owner has applied for and obtained the Section 1601 Agreements to allow work within streambeds and banks. A copy of the permit is included in the Appendix of the Project Manual.

5. City of Roseville Planning Department, Tree Permit: Owner has applied for and obtained a tree permit to allow removal or encroachment under Heritage Oaks.

B. Contractor shall comply with the conditions of these permits, and will be solely responsible for all costs associated with meeting permit conditions unless specifically specified otherwise in these Contract Documents.

Page 967 of 1881 ends

Project
Date
Section 00 31 46: Permits

Page 2 of 2 ends

PART 2 - PRODUCTS
Intentionally left blank.

PART 3 - EXECUTION
Intentionally left blank.

END OF SECTION

Page 968 of 1881 ends

Project
Date
Section 01 10 00: Summary of Work

Page 1 of 10 ends

SECTION 01 10 00

SUMMARY OF WORK
PART 1 - GENERAL

1.01 General
A. The requirements set forth in the General Conditions shall be in addition to the standards provided herein.

B. The requirements set forth in the Special Conditions shall be in addition to the standards provided herein.

1.02 Project Description
A. Project Name and address:

Sample Project Name
123 Main Street Roseville
B. Project description/scope of work:

The scope of this project includes …
C. The Contractor, prior to submission of his bid, shall visit the site and become familiar with the physical site conditions, the plans and specifications. All existing site conditions, apparent in a detailed, on-site inspection, shall be a part of the project. Submission of a bid shall represent the Contractor’s acknowledgment of the existing site conditions and its effect on the implementation of the contract documents.

1.03 Engineering
A. Field Engineering, as a part of this contract, shall include:

1. Layout of the work and establishment of lines and grades.

2. Said work to be performed by a California Registered Civil Engineer or a California licensed Land Surveyor.

3. When discrepancies between the drawings and actual site conditions are discovered, notify the Inspector for instruction on how to proceed.

4. All work shall:
a) Establish indicated layout in relation to the property survey and existing reference points.
b) Establish and preserve permanent reference points during the course of construction.
c) Set locations and elevations of all site elements as required for proper completion of the work.

Page 969 of 1881 ends

Project
Date
Section 01 10 00: Summary of Work

Page 2 of 10 ends

1.04 Permits, Fees and Notices
A. The Contractor and/or his assigned Subcontractors shall obtain any and all required permits (beyond those provided by the City’s Project Manager) from all governing authorities, including other City Departments, prior to start of construction.

1.05 Construction Plans
A. Any discrepancies or omissions found in the Contract Documents shall be reported to the City’s project manager immediately. The City’s project manager will clarify discrepancies or omissions, in writing, within a reasonable time.

B. In resolving inconsistencies among two or more sections of the Contract Documents, precedence shall be given in the following order:

1. Notice to Contractors

2. Special Provisions

3. City of Roseville Parks Construction Standards

4. City of Roseville Design and Construction Standards

5. Drawings
Addenda shall take precedence over all sections referenced therein. Figure dimensions on Drawings shall take precedence over scale dimensions.

Detailed Drawings shall take precedence over general Drawings.

1.06 Definitions
A. The term “accepted” where used within, shall mean accepted in writing by the City of Roseville’s Project Manager.

B. The term “Inspector”, where noted, shall mean the project representative, appointed by the City of Roseville, who will oversee the project on a day-today basis.

C. The term “Project Manager”, where noted, shall mean the project representative appointed by the Parks Department.

D. The term “Consultant”, where noted, shall mean the prime Consultant listed on the cover sheet of these Specifications.

E. The term “accepted equal”, where used herein, shall mean the equal in the opinion of the Project Manager, in consultation with the Consultant, when necessary, and as accepted in writing by the Project Manager.

F. The term “Project Owner”, where used herein, shall mean the landowner or developer.

G. The term “provide”, where used herein, shall mean furnish and install complete.

H. The term “as selected”, where used herein, shall mean as selected by the Consultant and as accepted by the Project Manager.

Page 970 of 1881 ends

Project
Date
Section 01 10 00: Summary of Work

Page 3 of 10 ends

I. The term “substantially complete”, where used herein, shall mean the state of which the project can be used in the manner of which it is intended with the exception of minor items as determined by the Project Manager.

J. See Section 1 of the General Conditions for additional definitions and terms.

1.07 Standards
A. Numerous standards are referenced in these contract documents. The referenced standards shall be the current edition as of the date of these contract documents. Also, see Section 4 - 1.02 of the General Conditions.

B. The codes adopted by the City, County, State and federal agencies shall govern minimum requirements for this project. Where codes conflict with these Specifications, the more stringent shall apply, and such conflicts shall be brought to the attention of the Project Manager. Caltrans Standards shall be applied where specifically referenced. In the absence of specific reference requirements in the contract documents, the applicable codes shall govern.

C. In addition to the standards noted in individual sections of these Specifications, standards of the following organizations shall be noted by initials only.

1. ANSI: American National Standards Institute.

2. ASTM: American Society for Testing and Materials.

1.08 Submittals
A. All submittals shall be submitted at one time within ten (10) working days from issuance of Notice to Proceed. The review time for submittals shall be as noted in Section 2 - 1.04 of the Special Conditions. Items returned for re- submittal shall be returned to the City within two weeks
B. The Contractor shall include a cover sheet indicating the following (A sample is provided in Section 5: Forms):

1. Drawing sheet or specification section reference (by section, paragraph and sub-paragraph numbers);

2. Item description;

3. Indication whether this item is “as specified” or “proposed substitution” and

4. A space for itemized response summary, e.g. “reviewed” or “resubmit”.

C. Contractor shall provide submittals electronically in PDF file format and physical product samples as required in specifications. It shall be the Contractor’s responsibility to ensure the summary sheet is included in the submittal package. Incomplete submittal packages (i.e., the lack of a summary sheet or lack an appropriate product sample) will not be reviewed.

D. Proposed substitution requests must include a comparison between the originally specified item and the proposed substitute. The burden of proof of compliance for proposed substitutions with project requirements rests with the Contractor. Coordination of the installation of accepted substitutions, including

Page 971 of 1881 ends

Project
Date
Section 01 10 00: Summary of Work

Page 4 of 10 ends

incidental changes/modifications to accommodate proposed products shall be at no additional cost to the Owner.

E. Where required in specified Section of these Specifications, submittals shall include proof of order of site furnishings, play equipment or other materials within two weeks (ten working days) of receipt of the returned, approved submittal. Submittals of orders shall be made at one time. Exceptions will be considered, with justification.

1.09 Tests
A. In addition to Section 4 - 1.03 of the General Conditions, testing and inspections may be performed by a private testing laboratory. The testing laboratory, provided by the City, shall be under the direction of a California registered civil engineer. All work shall conform to requirements set forth by ASTM B329, and shall be acceptable to the City.

B. Copies of the laboratory reports/results of each test or inspection shall be provided to the Project Manager, Inspector and Contractor.

1.10 Temporary Facilities
A. Sanitary provisions shall be the responsibility of the Contractor. Existing restroom facilities shall be not utilized by the Contractor, his Sub-contractors, or employees thereof, unless specifically accepted by the Project Manager.

Provide chemical toilets or water closets and urinals connected to the sewer in a location accepted by the Project Manager.

B. Barricades shall be the responsibility of the Contractor and shall be erected as necessary to protect the property, the construction and the public from hazards due to construction.

C. Signs, other than those identified in these Specifications, shall be prohibited.

Notices, required by law, shall be posted and maintained.

1.11 Utilities
A. All utility fees, including, but not limited to, connection fees, installation fees, meters, monthly service fees and cost of utilities used during the course of construction and establishment are considered a direct cost and are the responsibility of the Contractor until project acceptance by City Council.

1.12 Dust/Noise Control Requirements
A. Dust and other air pollution nuisances on or adjacent to the site shall be abated, per Section 2 - 1.15 of the General Conditions. Dirt shall not be allowed to accumulate on streets or sidewalks nor be washed into sewer.

B. Noise from construction operations shall be kept to a minimum. Allowable hours of operations shall be from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Monday through Friday. Work on

Page 972 of 1881 ends

Project
Date
Section 01 10 00: Summary of Work

Page 5 of 10 ends

weekends and holidays must be approved by the project manager. Work on weekends and holidays shall not begin before 8 a.m. and must be completed by 8 p.m.

1.13 Tree Replacement Schedule
A. Trees damaged or removed without prior approval shall be replaced at an inch per inch basis on-site, except otherwise accepted. New stock shall follow the table provided:

Plant Size Inch Value
3 Five Gallon Stock One Inch
1 Fifteen Gallon Stock One Inch
1 24” Box Stock Two Inches
1 36” Box Stock Three Inches

1.14 Inspection of Construction
A. In addition to the routine inspections performed by the Parks Inspector, portions of work may be inspected by the other city departments. Notify the Parks Inspector and Project Manager a minimum of 48 hours prior to date of inspection.

B. The Parks Inspector shall be the main line of communication between the site superintendent, the project manager and other City department inspectors.

Changes in scope of work or standards shall be approved by the project manager.

C. Refer to the parks inspection record. This shall be issued at the PreConstruction meeting and shall be utilized by the Contractor throughout the course of construction. A completed “hard card” shall be submitted to the Project Manager along with required turn in items (See 1.19 this Section) upon final acceptance of the project. The Notice of Completion shall not be filed until all record documents have been received and accepted.

1.15 Adverse Impacts to Site Conditions Due to Construction A. Impacts that affect the site conditions to the detriment of the park or streetscape impacts that affect the site conditions to the detriment of the park or streetscape construction or long term viability of the site shall be mitigated by the contractor prior to acceptance of the project. Such impacts shall include, but are not limited to:

1. Soil compaction in non-structural areas;

2. Diesel or gas fuel leaks/spillage;

3. Buried concrete or other construction debris;

4. Hazardous material contamination;

5. Lime treatment in planting areas;

6. and more.

Page 973 of 1881 ends

Project
Date
Section 01 10 00: Summary of Work

Page 6 of 10 ends

1.16 Pre-final (Punch List) Review
A. Notify, in writing, to the Parks Construction Inspector, that the work is substantially complete. Substantially complete is defined as “the state of work where it may be used in a suitable and intended manner with exception of minor corrections”. Partial acceptances will not be granted. Items to be reviewed as a part of substantial completion include:

1. All construction items

2. Installation of all site furnishings, including lights and signs

3. All planting, including mulch installation and weed control of planted areas. a) For sodded turf, upon sod installation
b) For seeded turf, upon second mowing as described in Section 329000, Part 3.11.

4. The irrigation system is fully functioning as designed and as confirmed by the landscape irrigation audit.

B. Within five workings days of receipt of notification, the Parks Construction Inspector will confirm substantial completion. The Parks Construction Inspector will schedule the punch list walk (pre-final review) within five working days after the project has been determined as substantially complete. A formal punch list will be developed at the punch list walk. The Parks Construction Inspector will provide a copy of the formal punch list to the Contractor within five working days of punch list walk. Performance of the punch list walk does not automatically trigger the start of establishment.

1. If at any point during this review it becomes apparent the Contractor has not properly prepared for the site review, the inspection shall immediately be terminated and re-scheduled at such a time as the site has been readied for a review. Any costs for the re-scheduling of the review shall be the responsibility of the Contractor. Lack of site preparation could delay start of the establishment period.

C. Concurrent to the pre-final review, the City will make a formal request for all required turn-in items to be submitted to the City. All turn-in items shall be submitted in their entirety to the City’s Park Construction Inspector. Partial turnin packages will be rejected.

D. Once all turn-in items have been confirmed to be complete and accurate, the establishment period may be considered to begin. The City shall have sole discretion in determining the appropriateness of the commencement of the establishment period and shall notify the developer/contractor in writing of the start and end dates. Portions of the project will not be accepted for establishment prior to the substantial completion of the entire project.

Page 974 of 1881 ends

Project
Date
Section 01 10 00: Summary of Work

Page 7 of 10 ends

1.17 Establishment Period
A. The duration of the establishment period shall be:

1. For seeded turf in parks: Ninety (90) calendar days, minimum, and until the Notice of Completion (NOC) for City-built parks has been approved by the City Council, or the deed transferring property ownership, has been recorded at the County for Developer-built parks.

2. For sodded turf in parks: Forty-five (45) calendar days commencing between March 1st and October 31st and sixty (60) calendar days commencing between November 1st and February 28th, and until the Notice of Completion (NOC) for City-built parks has been approved by the City Council, or the deed transferring property ownership, has been recorded at the County for Developer-built parks.

3. For streetscapes: Thirty (30) calendar days, minimum, and until final acceptance of all related street improvements subject to approval of a Notice of Completion by the City Council. The inclusion of large box trees (36” box and greater) may require an extended establishment period of ninety (90) calendar days, as noted on plans.

B. Active maintenance is required throughout the entire establishment period.

Active maintenance is defined as:

1. All areas within the project site shall be protected against damage including vandalism, erosion, trespass, rodents and other acts. Immediately repair all damaged areas.

2. All walkways and paved areas shall be kept clean and all debris within planting and turf areas shall be immediately removed.

3. Automatic irrigation controller shall be fully utilized and irrigation system monitored and adjusted as described in Section 32 84 00 4.03.

4. All plant and turf maintenance as described in Section 32 90 00 3.11 C. Prior to the start of the final thirty (30) days of establishment:

1. All punch list items shall be completed.

2. All certifications and testing shall be completed.

3. All plantings and turf shall be thriving and in a healthy condition.

4. The lack of active maintenance prior to the final thirty (30) days may constitute a delay in the start of the final thirty (30) days of the establishment period.

1.18 Final Review
A. One (1) week prior to the end of the establishment period, a final on-site review shall be conducted to review project readiness for final turn-over. All punch list items must be satisfactorily addressed prior to the final review.

Page 975 of 1881 ends

Project
Date
Section 01 10 00: Summary of Work

Page 8 of 10 ends

B. The project shall be prepared and cleaned per Section 2 - 1.12 of the General Conditions; the turf shall be mowed; and the irrigation heads shall be adjusted appropriately one day prior to the scheduled final review.

C. Acceptance of the project shall be considered “field accepted” and a recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council for “final acceptance” per Section 7 - 1.01 of the General Conditions.

D. An unaccepted project shall extend the establishment period until such time as the unaccepted portions of the project have been reviewed and field accepted by the Inspector and Project Manager.

E. Turn over for City maintenance shall occur only after:

1. The specified duration of the establishment period has been successfully completed.

2. If required, the deed transferring property ownership, has been recorded at the County.

3. A Notice of Completion (NOC) for city-built parks and for streetscapes has been approved by the City Council.

F. Contractor shall provide a written guarantee covering all improvements associated with this project. See 1.19 – Warranties and Guarantees.

1.19 Record Documents
A. Record documents or as-built plans shall be maintained on-site and updated routinely as specified in Section 2 - 1.13 of the General Conditions. Record documents shall include all items under the contracted scope of work.

B. Record documents shall be submitted:

1. two sets 11 x 17 laminated reductions of the irrigation plan illustrating with colors the individual controller stations; and

2. Electronically submit PDF scanned images (in color) of the verified/initialed as-built drawings.

3. For City of Roseville CIP projects, SWPPP binder.

1.20 Warranties and Guarantees
A. Warranties are required under various Sections of these Specifications. Prior to final acceptance, the Contractor shall combine all warranties into a single electronically submitted PDF, . All warranties shall be clearly labeled and the number of years highlighted. Also, see Sections 7 - 1.10 and 7 - 1.11 of the General Conditions.

1. Warranties for equipment shall be submitted in the manufacturer’s standard form and shall be countersigned by the subcontractor or supplier and the Contractor.

Page 976 of 1881 ends

Project
Date
Section 01 10 00: Summary of Work

Page 9 of 10 ends

2. All other warranties shall be provided in the following format, written on subcontractor’s or supplier’s letterhead, signed by the subcontractor or supplier and countersigned by the Contractor:

WARRANTY FOR YEARS
“We hereby warrant that the product which we have installed at project name has been done in accordance with the contract documents, and that the work, as installed will fulfill the warranty requirements included in the Specifications.

We agree to repair or replace any or all of our work, together with any other adjacent work which may be displaced by so doing, that may prove to be defective in its workmanship or material within the warranty period stated above commencing from the date of final acceptance of the above named project by the City of Roseville’s City Council, without additional expense to the City, ordinary wear and tear and unusual abuse or neglect excepted.

In the event of failure to comply with the above conditions within thirty (30) days of notification by the City, we collectively or separately do hereby authorize the City to proceed with the repairs or replacement of such defects at our expense. Payment of said costs and charges will be forwarded to the City upon demand.

Signed:

Subcontractor or Supplier Date
Countersigned:

Contractor Date
B. Guarantees shall be a minimum of one (1) year for all plant material, including trees and shrubs. The guarantee shall state that plant materials (trees & shrubs) to be free of all defects or disease and all plants are in a healthy and thriving condition at the completion of the contract. Deciduous plant material shall be warranted beyond the time of contract completion until such time as growth becomes evident.

PART 2 - PRODUCTS
Intentionally left blank.

Page 977 of 1881 ends
← All documents from this meeting