Roseville City Council
December 17, 2025

Roseville Electric Building, 116 S. Grant Street, 1st Floor roseville.ca.us The City of Roseville welcomes your participation.

Meeting Schedule: Regular meetings of the City Council are held on the first and third Wednesday of each month at 6:00 p.m.

Two Public Comment Periods for Non-Agenda Items: A total of twenty-five (25) minutes is allotted for public comments. At the beginning and end of the meeting, each speaker has three (3) minutes to address the Mayor/Chair on issues that are not listed on the agenda and are within the City’s jurisdiction. Please submit a yellow speaker card to the City Clerk before the item is heard if you wish to make a comment. You will still have an opportunity to comment if you haven’t filled out a yellow speaker card.

Brown Act: The City Council cannot discuss or act on items not listed on the agenda. Public Comment on Agenda Items: Each speaker has five (5) minutes to address items that are listed on the agenda.

Levine Act Provisions: If you’ve made a campaign contribution totaling more than $500 ($250 prior to January 1, 2025) to City Council Members in the last twelve (12) months, you must disclose it before addressing an item on the agenda. Please visit Levine Act – City of Roseville for updated forms and information.

Audio/Visual Presentations: If making a presentation regarding an agenda item, audio/visual materials must be submitted to the City Clerk for consideration at least 72 hours in advance.

Americans with Disabilities Act: If special assistance is required to participate in a meeting, including the need of auxiliary aids or services, please notify the City Clerk at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. City Clerk 311 Vernon Street [email protected] 916-774-5263 TDD: 916-774-5220 Security Measures: All meeting attendees must successfully pass through a security metal detector. Any person with a prohibited item will not be allowed entry. Prohibited items include but are not limited to firearms (even with valid CCW), knives, pepper spray/mace, explosives of any kind/any weapons and/or dangerous devices of any kind, illegal drugs, and alcohol.

Viewing Options: The City of Roseville provides three options for viewing meetings:

Krista Bernasconi, Mayor
Karen Alvord, Vice Mayor
Bruce Houdesheldt, Councilmember
Tracy Mendonsa, Councilmember
Pauline Roccucci, Councilmember
Dominick Casey, City Manager
Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk

AMENDED AGENDA
City Council
Housing Authority/Housing Successor/
Finance Authority Meeting
December 17, 2025
6:00 PM
Roseville Electric Building, 116 S. Grant Street, 1st Floor I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
IV. MEETING PROCEDURES
V. PRESENTATION

1. Gold Medal Finalist Plaque and Accreditation Award Presentation Summary: Jane Adams from the American Academy for Park and Recreation Administration to present Parks, Recreation, and Libraries with their Gold Medal Finalist Award.

CONTACT: Jill Geller 916-774-5249 [email protected] VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the first opportunity to make a public comment on non-agenda items.

VII. CONSENT CALENDAR

2. Infrastructure Network and Server Equipment - Sole Source Contract Purchase Agreement and Budget Adjustment (INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT - INFRASTRUCTURE

SOLUTIONS)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a sole source contract purchase agreement with E.F.

Johnson Company in the amount of $113,500.67 to provide equipment and related services to upgrade the City radio system's network equipment. Sole source procurement is required as E.F.

Johnson Company is the only provider capable of upgrading the equipment to minimize impact on City operations while maintaining system support long-term. Staff also recommends approval of a $40,000 budget adjustment to fully fund the project, which includes higher-than-anticipated

equipment costs, required City IT labor, and a small contingency to ensure successful completion. This project is funded through the City's standard citywide technology allocation methodology.

CONTACT: Karl Grover 916-774-5145 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-378 approving a contract purchase agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and E.F. Johnson Company, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville; and
b. Adopt Ordinance No. 7019 authorizing certain amendments to the fiscal year 2025-26 budget and declaring this ordinance to be immediately effective as an appropriation measure.

3. Fire Department's Very High Frequency Radio System Upgrade - Contract Purchase Agreement (INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT - INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS) Summary: Staff recommends approval of a contract purchase agreement with Silke Communications Solutions Inc. in the amount of $580,639.42 to provide equipment, services, maintenance and support for Fire's Very High Frequency Radio System. Initial funding is included in the Fire Very High Frequency Radio System Upgrade Project budget and recurring support costs will be included in the Information Technology Operations Fund each fiscal year.

CONTACT: Karl Grover 916-774-5145 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-361 approving an agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Silke Communications Solutions Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

4. Park and Park Facility Exclusions - Municipal Code Amendment (CITY ATTORNEY DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends the City Council introduce for first reading an ordinance amending Roseville Municipal Code Section 8.02.316, “Park and park facility exclusions." City staff is proposing modifications to the existing park and park facility exclusion ordinance to provide clarity to staff and the public and increase operational efficiencies.

CONTACT: Joseph Speaker 916-774-5325 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Introduce for first reading an ordinance amending Roseville Municipal Code Section 8.02.316, “Park and park facility exclusions”.

5. 2025 HOME Program Income Funding Application (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT -

HOUSING)

Summary: Staff recommends approval of an application to the California Department of Housing and Community Development for the HOME Program Income Notice of Funding Availability in the amount of $500,000 to support the Owner-Occupied Rehabilitation Program, and authorize execution of the application, standard agreement, and any related grant documents. This action will have no impact on the City’s General Fund.

CONTACT: Trisha Isom, Danielle OConnell 916-746-1239, 916-774-5277 [email protected], [email protected]
The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-368 authorizing the submission of the HOME investment partnerships program application to the California State Department of Housing and Community Development, and authorizing the Mayor to execute it and any related documents necessary to participate and comply with the program on behalf of the City of Roseville.

6. HOUSING AUTHORITY/CITY COUNCIL - Quarterly Status Update 3rd Quarter 2025 (ECONOMIC

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - HOUSING)
Summary: Staff recommends City Council, acting as the Roseville Housing Authority Board, receive a status report on the Housing Authority’s Housing Choice Voucher Program for the Third Quarter of 2025. This report is for informational purposes only and has no impact on the City's General Fund.

CONTACT: Suzi Cook-Turner 916-774-5414 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. This quarterly report is for informational purposes only.

7. HOUSING AUTHORITY — Administrative Plan Amendment (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

DEPARTMENT - HOUSING)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a revised Roseville Housing Authority Administrative Plan as required by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. The Administrative Plan has no impact on the City's General Fund.

CONTACT: Suzi Cook-Turner 916-774-5414 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-380 approving the updated Roseville Housing Authority Administrative Plan.

8. HOUSING SUCCESSOR/CITY COUNCIL - Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Annual Report of the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - HOUSING) Summary: Staff recommends approval of the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Annual Report for the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund. The Roseville Housing Successor Agency must produce a

report of housing activities annually stating the fund balance and use of the funds. The Housing Successor Agency funds used for development of local affordable housing units and homeless prevention services reduces impacts on the General Fund.

CONTACT: Emily Sawin 916-774-5388 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-364 approving the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Annual Report for the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund.

9. Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing - Agreement Amendments (ECONOMIC

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - HOUSING)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing agreement amendments with Advocates for Mentally Ill Housing, Latino Leadership Council, and Salvation Army. The amendments will increase the agreement grant amounts and support the City's goal to maintain a safe and healthy community. No General Fund resources will be used for these amendments.

CONTACT: Suzanne Acrell 916-774-5469 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-382 approving a first amendment to Grant agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Advocates for Mentally Ill Housing, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville; and b. Adopt Resolution No. 25-383 approving a first amendment to Grant Agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Latino Leadership Council Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville; and c. Adopt Resolution No. 25-384 approving a first amendment to Grant Agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and the Salvation Army, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

10. Staffing Changes (HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1245 (IBEW) A & B salary schedules reflecting the addition of a Power Generation Safety Technician classification. Updates to the City allocation schedule reflect the addition of three (3) regular full-time positions: a Power Generation Safety Technician, a Deputy City Attorney I/II and an Assistant Engineer. For the remainder of FY2025-26, the financial impact of the recommendations to the Electric Fund and Water Operations Fund is $246,242.

Beyond the current fiscal year, the recommended changes have an annual ongoing impact of $613,483 to the Electric, General and Water Operations Fund, including an estimated $121,000 to the General Fund.

CONTACT: Macy Dippert 916-774-5215 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Ordinance No. 7020 amending Odinance 6932, the salary ordinance for personnel represented by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1245, as amended by appendix “k” to be effective December 27, 2025 as an urgency measure; and b. Approve the attached city-wide allocation schedule effective December 27, 2025.

11. Local Agency Special Tax and Bond Accountability Act Reports (FINANCE DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends acceptance of the informational reports prepared for the 2024-25 levy year to be filed with the City Clerk. Senate Bill 165 (SB 165) enacted the Local Agency Special Tax and Bond Accountability Act (the “Act”). The Act requires that any local special tax or local bond measure subject to voter approval include a statement identifying the specific purposes of the special tax, that the proceeds be used for those purposes, the establishment of a designated account for the deposit of proceeds, and the preparation of an annual report detailing the use of those funds. There is no fiscal impact to the City’s General Fund.

CONTACT: Jeannine Thrash 916-774-5473 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Accept informational reports prepared for the 2024-25 levy year to be filed with the City Clerk.

12. Fertilizer Plus Dimension (RFQ 10-3430) - Purchase Orders (FINANCE DEPARTMENT -

PURCHASING)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a purchase order to Nutrien Ag Solutions for the purchase of fertilizer plus Dimension in response to Request for Quotations No. 10-3430. The estimated cost for calendar year 2026 is $93,096. Estimated spending for the optional renewal calendar years are as follows: Calendar Year (CY) 2027 $98,000; CY 2028 $103,000; CY 2029 $108,000; CY2030 $113,000. Funding for these purchases is and will be included in the Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department’s Parks Division budget and in the Community Facilities Districts' budgets for each respective year. Staff requests authorization to continue utilizing the remaining four optional renewal years without further Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council each year, until the contract expires or until City staff determines that continuing with the same vendor is not in the City's best interest.

CONTACT: Joanna Oukrop 916-746-1102 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-365 approving purchase orders for the purchase of fertilizer plus dimension.

13. Miscellaneous Waterworks Materials (RFQ-3376) - Purchase Order Increase (ENVIRONMENTAL

UTILITIES DEPARTMENT - WATER)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of an increase of $205,000 to the estimated total combined value of the FY2025-26 purchase orders to Pace Supply Corporation and Ferguson Enterprises, LLC dba Ferguson Waterworks, as the lowest responsive and responsible bidders for the purchase of miscellaneous waterworks materials. The requested increase is due to an unexpected increase in the Environmental Utilities Water Utility requirements for parts supplied. This request will increase the estimated total award between the two suppliers for FY2025-26 to $1,250,000. Purchase orders will be issued as needed. Spending for FY2025-26 is included in department budgets in various City funds. Future spending is contingent upon Council approval of the City budget.

CONTACT: Robert Strebel 916-746-1717 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Approve an increase to the existing purchase order with Pace Supply Corporation and Ferguson Enterprises, LLC dba Ferguson Waterworks.

14. Water and Local Wastewater Capacity/Connection Fee Update and Nexus Study - Professional Services Agreement Amendment (ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends approval of a First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc. for the Water and Local Wastewater Capacity/Connection Fee Update and Nexus Study in the amount of $11,895. The First Amendment will increase the total not-to exceed amount from $72,700 to $84,595 with available funding in the Water and Wastewater Operations Funds.

CONTACT: Linda York 916-774-5564 [email protected]
The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-367 approving first amendment to a professional service agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

15. Water, Wastewater and Recycled Water Cost-of-Service/Rate Study - Professional Services Agreement Amendment (ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends approval of a first amendment to the professional services agreement with Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc. for the Water, Wastewater and Recycled Water Cost-of-Service / Rate Study in the amount of $10,890. The first amendment will increase the total not-to exceed amount from $91,560 to $102,450 to cover additional recycled waterrelated services. Funding is available in the Wastewater Operations Fund.

CONTACT: Deanne Garcia 916-774-1780 [email protected]

The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-369 approving a first amendment to professional services agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

16. Environmental Utilities Strategic Plan Development - Professional Services Agreement (ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a professional services agreement with Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc. in the amount of $144,750 to provide strategic planning services for Waste Services and a comprehensive Environmental Utilities Strategic Plan. Funding is included in the Environmental Utilities Department budget.

CONTACT: Kristina McKee 916-774-5595 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-381 approving a professional services agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

17. Corridors Trunk Sewer Capacity Improvements Project – Professional Design Services Agreement (ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT - WASTEWATER) Summary: Staff recommends approval of a professional design services agreement with Water Works Engineers, LLC in the amount of $779,214 for design services and engineering services during construction of the Corridors Trunk Sewer Capacity Improvements Project. Funding for this agreement is provided by the South Placer Wastewater Authority, which is jointly funded by the City, Placer County and South Placer Municipal Utilities District.

CONTACT: Kyle Drury [email protected]
The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-377 approving a professional design services agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Water Works Engineers, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

18. Lower Bank Park Project - Notice of Completion (PARKS, RECREATION, AND LIBRARIES

DEPARTMENT - PARK DEVELOPMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the Notice of Completion for the Lower Bank Park Project. The total cost of the construction contract with Brightview Landscape Development, Inc. is $1,205,521.93. Funding for this project was included in the Creekview Neighborhood Park Fund.

CONTACT: Joel De Jong 916-774-5924 [email protected]

The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-376 accepting the public work known as Lower Bank Park Project, approving the “Notice of Completion”, and authorizing the Parks, Recreation and Libraries Director to execute said notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

19. Rocky Rockholm (FD-51) Park Project - Notice of Completion (PARKS, RECREATION, AND

LIBRARIES DEPARTMENT - PARK DEVELOPMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the Notice of Completion for the Rocky Rockholm (FD51) Park Project. The total cost of the construction contract with Hemington Landscape Service, Inc. is $520,888.04. Funding for this project was included in the Neighborhood Park - Sierra Vista Fund.

CONTACT: Joel De Jong 916-774-5924 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-366 accepting the Public Work known as Rocky Rockholm (Fd-51) Park Project, approving the “Notice of Completion”, and authorizing the Parks, Recreation And Libraries Director to execute said notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

20. Professional Golf Services - Agreement Amendment (PARKS, RECREATION, AND LIBRARIES

DEPARTMENT - RECREATION)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a second amendment to the agreement with SRI Golf, Inc. to provide golf services at Woodcreek Golf Club and Diamond Oaks Golf Course. The financial impacts will be based on revenues generated under the contract’s structure, including a fixed annual fee and percentage-based revenues generated from golf rounds played, cart rentals, and driving range sales. Funding is in the Golf Course Funds, in which golf revenues offset expenses including maintenance, utilities and internal service fee expenses.

CONTACT: Rob Nakamura 916-774-5135 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-373 approving a second amendment to agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and SRI Golf, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

21. Taser Equipment - Contract Purchase Agreement Amendment (POLICE DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends approval of an amendment to a contract purchase agreement with Axon Enterprise, Inc. to increase the agreement total by $93,685.89, bringing the total agreement amount to $818,520.42 to provide tasers for the Police Department. Twenty additional taser handles will be purchased and assigned to the Department's Animal Control Officers, Reserve Officers, and Special Weapons and Tactical Team. The FY2025-26 total cost for the twenty additional taser handles is $31,728.81. Funding is included in the Police Department's General Fund budget.

CONTACT: Mark Peinado 916-774-5021 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-372 approving a contract purchase agreement amendment no. 1, by and between the City of Roseville and Axon Enterprise, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

22. Advanced Metering Infrastructure — Master Services Agreement Amendment (ELECTRIC

DEPARTMENT - FINANCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the fourth amendment to the master services agreement with Itron, Inc. for continued Advanced Metering Infrastructure Data Collection and Meter Data Management software, licensing, and maintenance. This amendment will increase the contract amount by $4,984,915.78 to ensure continued system support and pricing stability over the next five years. This contract will be funded by both the Electric Utility and Environmental Utilities and allocated annually in the Utility Business Systems budget.

CONTACT: Caitlin Ornelas 916-774-5178 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-370 approving a fourth amendment to master services agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Itron, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

23. Settlement Software System Implementation and Support - Sole Source Contract Purchase Agreement (ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT - FINANCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE) Summary: Staff recommends approval of a sole source contract purchase agreement with Yes Energy LLC dba Power Settlements Consulting and Software LLC, in the amount of $866,217, to provide implementation, license and support services for the CAISO Settlecore Software Settlement System (Settlecore), a modern settlement software platform that will replace Roseville Electric’s existing system. The current software is outdated and no longer aligns with the City’s technology environment or business requirements. The Settlecore system is being procured as a sole source as it is the only solution already integrated with the existing Energy Imbalance Market settlements through the Balancing Authority of Northern California (BANC).

Funding is included in the Electric Fund budget.

CONTACT: Steve Hancock 916-774-5631 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-387 approving an agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Yes Energy LLC dba Power Settlements Consulting and Software LLC, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

24. 106 Ben Ezra Avenue - Parcel Map (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING

DIVISION)

Summary: Staff recommends approval of the 106 Ben Ezra Avenue parcel map. Engineering has completed its review of the parcel map and found that it is in compliance with the approved tentative map. This map will create two lots for future development. The actions requested have no fiscal impact to the City's General Fund.

CONTACT: Ed Winston 916-774-5432 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Approve the parcel map on file with the City Clerk and accept, on behalf of the public, the public easements offered thereon for dedication.

25. Sierra Vista KT-1A - Notice of Completion (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT -

ENGINEERING DIVISION)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the Notice of Completion for Sierra Vista KT-1A. The Engineering Division has made a final inspection of the project and has found the roadway infrastructure work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications.

This action has no impact to the City's General Fund. Construction costs were paid by the developer.

CONTACT: Ignacio Vizcarra 916-774-5578 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-362 accepting the public work known as Sierra Vista KT-1A Project, approving the "Notice of Completion", and authorizing and directing the City Engineer to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville, therefore, and accepting all dedications offered on the Recorded Map of the Subdivision.

26. Sierra Vista KT-1B - Notice of Completion (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT -

ENGINEERING DIVISION)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the Notice of Completion for Sierra Vista KT-1B. The Engineering Division has made a final inspection of the project and has found the roadway infrastructure work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications.

This action has no impact to the City's General Fund. Construction costs were paid by the developer.

CONTACT: Ignacio Vizcarra 916-774-5578 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-363 accepting the public work known as Sierra Vista KT-1B Project, approving the "Notice of Completion", and authorizing and directing the City Engineer to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville, therefore, and accepting all dedications offered on the Recorded Map of the Subdivision.

27. Creekview Phase 5 Villages 1 & 2 - Notice of Completion (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING DIVISION)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the Notice of Completion for the Creekview Phase 5 Villages 1 & 2 as complete. The Engineering Division has made the final inspection of the project and has found the roadway infrastructure work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications. This action has no impact to the City's General Fund. Construction costs were paid by the developer.

CONTACT: Troy Galvin 916-774-5441 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-386 accepting the public work known as Creekview Phase 5 Village 1 & 2 Project, approving the "Notice of Completion", and authorizing and directing the City Engineer to execute said notice on behalf of the City of Roseville, therefore, and accepting a portion of the dedications offered on the recorded map of the subdivision.

28. Creekview Phase 5 Villages 3 & 4 - Notice of Completion (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING DIVISION)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the Notice of Completion for the Creekview Phase 5 Villages 3 & 4 as complete. The Engineering Division has made a final inspection of the project and has found the roadway infrastructure work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications. This action has no impact to the City's General Fund. Construction costs were paid by the developer.

CONTACT: Troy Galvin 916-774-5441 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-385 accepting the public work known as Creekview Phase 5 Villages 3 & 4 Project, approving the "Notice of Completion", and authorizing and directing the City Engineer to execute said notice on behalf of the City of Roseville, therefore, and accepting a portion of the dedications offered on the recorded map of the subdivision.

29. Minutes of Prior Meetings (CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the minutes of the November 19, 2025 Closed Session and the November 19, 2025 City Council Meeting.

CONTACT: Adilia Keller 916-774-5265 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Approve the minutes of the November 19, 2025 Closed Session and the November 19, 2025 City Council Meeting.

30. Resolution - Estela Roig

Summary: Commend Estela Roig for her 20 years of outstanding service and dedication to the City of Roseville and the Finance Department, congratulate her for her many accomplishments, and wish her a long, healthy, and fulfilling retirement.

CONTACT: Arleta Wagenhals 916-774-5200 [email protected]

31. Second Reading - Massage Services – Municipal Code Amendment (CITY ATTORNEY

DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends the City Council approve an ordinance amending Chapter 9.10 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding massage services.

CONTACT: Travis Cochran 916-774-5325 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Ordinance No. 7017 amending Chapter 9.10 of Title 9 of the Roseville Municipal Code Regarding Massage Services.

32. Second Reading - Alarm Systems - Roseville Municipal Code Amendment (CITY ATTORNEY

DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a second reading of an ordinance amending Sections

10.64.030, 10.64.060, and 10.64.130 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding alarm systems and corresponding fines.

CONTACT: Travis Cochran 916-774-5325 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Ordinance No. 7018 amending Sections 10.64.030, 10.64.060, and 10.64.130 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding alarm systems.

33. Second Reading - Public Facilities Fee Update - Roseville Municipal Code Amendment (FINANCE DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the second reading of an ordinance approving adjustments to the Public Facilities Fee and amending Roseville Municipal Code Sections 4.52.010, 4.52.020, 4.52.040, 4.52.050, 4.52.060, 4.52.070, 4.52.080, 4.52.090, and

4.52.130 of Chapter 4.52 related to Public Facilities Fees.

CONTACT: Jeannine Thrash 916-774-5473 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Ordinance No. 7016 amending sections 4.52.010, 4.52.020, 4.52.040, 4.52.050,

4.52.060, 4.52.070, 4.52.080, 4.52.090, and 4.52.130 of Chapter 4.52 of Title 4 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Public Facilities Fees.

34. Appointment of Youth Board Member and Youth Commissioners (CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT)

Summary: Staff recommends Council appoint Zach Unidad as the Grants Advisory Commission Youth Commissioner to a term ending December 31, 2026; and appoint Rochaelin Nguyen as the Library Board Youth Member to a term ending December 31, 2026; and appoint Olive Bailey as the Parks and Recreation Commission Youth Commissioner to a term ending December 31, 2026; and appoint Aishani Thakur as the Transportation Commission Youth Commissioner to a term ending December 31, 2026.

CONTACT: Katrina Six 916-774-5267 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Appoint Zach Unidad as the Grants Advisory Commission Youth Commissioner to a term expiring December 31, 2026.
b. Appoint Rochaelin Nguyen as the Library Board Youth Member to a term expiring December 31, 2026.
c. Appoint Olive Bailey as the Parks and Recreation Commission Youth Commissioner to a term expiring December 31, 2026.
d. Appoint Aishani Thakur as the Transportation Commission Youth Commissioner to a term expiring December 31, 2026.

35. Proclamation - Homeless Persons' Memorial Day December 21, 2025 Summary: Proclaim the 21st day of December 2025 as Homeless Persons' Memorial Day in the City of Roseville.

CONTACT: Arleta Wagenhals 916-774-5200 [email protected]

END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
VIII. PRESENTATIONS/REPORTS

36. Unscheduled Board and Commission Vacancies - Appointments (CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends Council appoint one (1) individual to the Local Sales Tax Citizens' Oversight Committee to a term expiring June 30, 2029, from the applications received from Lori Benitez and Frank Udvarhely; and appoint one (1) individual to the Planning Commission to a term expiring June 30, 2026, from applications received from Michael Bradford, Jeffrey Gold, Ed Kriz, Lewis McGeorge, Jason Probst, Jim Ratliff, and Ravi Sharma; and appoint one (1) individual to the Public Utilities Commission to a term expiring June 30, 2028, from the applications received from John Carrier and Frank Udvarhely; and appoint Jeffrey Gold and Gerald Feinerman to the Senior Commission to terms expiring December 31, 2026.

CONTACT: Katrina Six 916-774-5267 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:

a. Appoint one (1) individual to the Local Sales Tax Citizens' Oversight Committee to a term expiring June 30, 2029, from the applications received from Lori Benitez and Frank Udvarhely; and
b. Appoint one (1) individual to the Planning Commission to a term expiring June 30, 2026, from the applications received from Michael Bradford, Jeffrey Gold, Ed Kriz, Lewis McGeorge, Jason Probst, Jim Ratliff, and Ravi Sharma; and
c. Appoint one (1) individual to the Public Utilities Commission to a term expiring June 30, 2028, from the applications received from John Carrier and Frank Udvarhely; and d. Appoint two (2) individuals to the Senior Commission to a term expiring December 31, 2026, from applications received from Jeffrey Gold and Gerald Feinerman.

37. Council Discretionary Funds Request - Roseville Joint Unified High School District (CITY

MANAGER DEPARTMENT - ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER)
Summary: Staff recommends the City Council consider a request for $3,000 from Council Discretionary Funds for Roseville Joint Union High School District (RJUHSD) for the Local Scholarship Program. The district would use the funds to award three $1,000 scholarships to Class of 2026 students in May 2026. The scholarship will be open to seniors in the RJUHSD school district who will be continuing their education at a two or four-year college or trade school and either complete a Career Technical Education pathway at their high school and/or worked as a City employee or intern. The balance remaining in the Council’s Discretionary Funds for FY2025-26 is $16,321.

CONTACT: Heather Blanco 916-746-1171 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Consider a request for $3,000 from Council Discretionary Funds for Roseville Joint Union High School District (RJUHSD) for the Local Scholarship Program.

38. Council Discretionary Funds Request - AllegiantVETS (CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT -

ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER)
Summary: Staff recommends the City Council consider a sponsorship request in the amount of $500 from Council Discretionary Funds to support AllegiantVETS for their "All In for Veterans" Poker Tournament on November 7, 2025. The $500 will help with the prizes for the Poker Tournament. AllegiantVETS assists with transitioning veterans once the uniform comes off with job placement, hands-on career training, one-on-one mentorship, and provides America's heroes with the tools and network to thrive in civilian life. The balance remaining in the Council’s Discretionary Funds for FY2025-26 is $16,321.

CONTACT: Heather Blanco 916-746-1171 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:

a. Consider a sponsorship request in the amount of $500 from Council Discretionary Funds to support AllegiantVETS for their "All In for Veterans" Poker Tournament on November 7th, 2025.

39. Council Discretionary Funds Request - Downtown Roseville Partnership (CITY MANAGER

DEPARTMENT - ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER)
Summary: Staff recommends the City Council consider a request for $2,000 from Council Discretionary Funds for Downtown Roseville Partnership for the 64th Annual Sylvia Besana Holiday Parade on December 6, 2025, in downtown Roseville. This family-friendly event includes food and craft booth vendors, and a parade with Santa. The parade presents an opportunity to drive business and interest in our downtown area as well as create additional revenue for our city through sales and increased business. In 2024, this event drew over 4,000 parade watchers, 60 parade units, and dozens of volunteers to make it a success. The balance remaining in the Council’s Discretionary Funds for FY2025-26 is $16,321.

CONTACT: Heather Blanco 916-746-1171 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Consider a request for $2,000 from Council Discretionary Funds for Downtown Roseville Partnership for the 64th annual Sylvia Besana Holiday Parade on December 6, 2025, in downtown Roseville.

40. Labor Market Adjustments, Updates to the Management and Confidential Terms, Conditions and Understandings, and Temporary Salary Schedule Updates with Minimum Wage Increases (HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT)
Summary: In accordance with current labor agreements, staff recommends Council approve the updated International Union of Operating Engineers, Stationary Engineers, Local 39 (Local 39), Roseville Police Association (RPA), Confidential and Management A and B salary schedules reflecting labor market adjustments to bring classifications to the 55% percentile effective January 10, 2026. In addition, updates are recommended to the Management and Confidential Terms, Conditions and Understandings. The salary schedule updates cost $2,493,457 for the remaining 12 pay periods of the fiscal year, with the General Fund portion totaling $1,312,742, and the updated management terms will cost $7,126 to the General Fund. The Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26 adopted budget includes adequate resources in the General Fund Contingency to fund this cost. The California Department of Finance has certified a minimum wage increase from $16.50 per hour to $16.90 per hour on January 1, 2026. A total of thirteen (13) temporary classifications are recommended to receive a salary increase. The fiscal impact to the Youth Development Fund is $1,250 and to the General Fund is approximately $23,800. There are adequate resources available in the FY2025-26 budget to absorb this cost. Staff is also requesting the addition of two (2) new temporary classifications and retitling of one (1) temporary classification to meet the City’s business needs.

CONTACT: Macy Dippert 916-774-5215 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:

a. Adopt Ordinance No. 7021 amending Ordinance No. 7015, the salary ordinance for employees represented by the International Union of Operating Engineers, Stationary Engineers, Local 39, as amended by appendix “J” to be effective January 10, 2026, as an urgency measure; and b. Adopt Ordinance No. 7022 amending Ordinance No. 6966, the salary ordinance for NonSworn employees represented by the Roseville Police Association, as amended by appendix “F” to be effective January 10, 2026, as an urgency measure; and c. Adopt Ordinance No. 7023 amending Ordinance No. 6967, the salary ordinance for Confidential Employees, as amended by appendix “D” to be effective January 10, 2026, as an urgency measure; and
d. Adopt Ordinance No. 7024 amending Ordinance No. 7014, the salary ordinance for Management Employees, as amended by appendix “N” to be effective January 10, 2026, as an urgency measure; and
e. Adopt Resolution No. 25-388 to approve the updated Management and Confidential Terms, Conditions and Understandings, effective December 27, 2025; and f. Adopt Ordinance No. 7025 amending Ordinance No. 6969, the salary ordinance for Seasonal/Temporary Employees, as amended by appendix “Z” to be effective December 27, 2025, as an urgency measure.

41. Roseville Police Officers' Association Successor Memorandum of Understanding (HUMAN

RESOURCES DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a successor Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Roseville Police Officers’ Association for a term beginning January 1, 2026, to December 31, 2029. The cost to the Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-2026 General Fund budget will be $859,348.

These costs will be covered by the existing budget. The overall ongoing projected costs of salary and benefit increases to the General Fund over the MOU four-year term is $10,831,359. This total contract cost amount includes the estimate for the general wage increases of two and onehalf percent in year two and year four, but does not account for labor market adjustments to maintain salaries at the 55th percentile of the market in year three that will be presented to the City Council in December 2028.

CONTACT: Janie Carduff 916-774-5205 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Resolution No. 25-389 approving a Successor Memorandum of Understanding for Sworn Employees represented by the Roseville Police Officers’ Association, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville; and b. Ordinance No. 7026 amending Ordinance No. 6898, the salary ordinance for sworn employees

represented by the Roseville Police Officers’ Association, as amended by appendix “A” to be effective January 10, 2026 as an urgency measure.

IX. PUBLIC HEARINGS
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC: Public Hearing Process
City Council, when considering the matter, will take the following actions:

1. Open the Public Hearing

2. Presentation by staff

3. Presentation by applicant or appellant

4. Accept public testimony

5. Appellant or applicant rebuttal period

6. Close the Public Hearing

7. City Council comments and questions

8. City Council action
Any challenges in court about public hearing matters noticed on this agenda may be limited to only those issues, that were raised orally at the public hearing or in written form received by the City on or before the hearing.

Public Hearings listed for continuance will be continued and posting of this agenda will serve as notice of continuation.

42. Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Resolution (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - PLANNING) Summary: Staff recommends adoption of a Resolution affirming the Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan dated December 2023 is adopted and incorporated by reference as part of the Safety Element of the City's General Plan to comply with California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services guidelines. This will have no impact on the General Fund.

CONTACT: Lauren Hocker 916-774-5272 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-374 affirming the City of Roseville Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan dated December 2023 is adopted and incorporated by reference as part of the Safety Element of the City of Roseville General Plan.

43. Use Type Classifications and Definitions — Municipal Code Amendment (DEVELOPMENT

SERVICES - PLANNING)
Summary: At the October 23, 2025 Planning Commission hearing, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council introduce for first reading an ordinance amending Sections

19.08.080 and 19.95.030 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Use Type Classifications and Definitions clarifying the City's definitions for "kitchens" with the purpose of defining how dwelling units are classified in the Municipal Code.

CONTACT: Eric Singer 916-774-5536 [email protected]

The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Introduce for first reading an Ordinance amending Sections 19.08.080 and 19.95.030 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Use Type Classifications and Definitions.

44. Infill Objective Design Standards Approval (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - PLANNING) Summary: Staff recommends approval of the Objective Design Standards for multi-family and single-family medium density residential projects for use within the City’s Infill Planning Area, with the intention of regulating the following aspects of development: site planning and building siting; edge and boundary treatments; topography and grading; access, circulation, and parking; service and storage; architectural design; landscaping; lighting; and signage. The proposed amendments will have no impact on the City’s General Fund.

CONTACT: Eric Singer 916-774-5536 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-379 approving the Infill Objective Design Standards for multifamily residential development and medium density residential development.

45. Backflow Prevention Inspection and Cross-Connection Control - Municipal Code Amendment and Updated Fine and Bail Schedule (ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends the City Council introduce for first reading an ordinance amending Chapter 14.10 of the Roseville Municipal Code, which prescribes regulations governing Backflow Prevention and Cross Connection Control, and provisionally approve the fine and bail schedule additions related to Cross-Connection Control Program enforcement, subject to the Municipal Code amendment being adopted at the second reading.

CONTACT: Rachel Tooker 916-746-1712 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Introduce for first reading an ordinance amending Chapter 14.10 of the Roseville Municipal Code which prescribes regulations governing Backflow Prevention and Cross Connection Control; and
b. Adopt Resolution No. 25-371 adopting a fine and bail schedule for enforcement of municipal code violations and repealing Resolution 25-190 subject to the Municipal Code amendment being adopted at the second reading.

46. City Council/Finance Authority — Issuance and Sale of 2026 Electric System Revenue Bonds (FINANCE DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends that the City Council, acting in its capacity and as the Board of the Roseville Finance Authority, approve the issuance of the 2026 Roseville Finance Authority Electric System Revenue Bonds (2026 Bonds). The 2026 Bonds are being issued for an amount not to exceed $88,000,000 to finance the Roseville Power Plant #2 Repower Project and other

electric system capital improvements. Issuance of these bonds will not impact the City’s General Fund.

CONTACT: Dennis Kauffman, Joanna Cucchi 916-774-5313, 916-746-1609 [email protected], [email protected]
The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 25-375 authorizing the issuance and sale of electric system revenue bonds by the Roseville Finance Authority, execution of a supplemental installment purchase contract, a contract of purchase for the bonds, and approving related documents and official actions; and
b. Adopt Roseville Finance Authority Resolution No. 3-25 a resolution of the Board of Directors of the Roseville Finance Authority authorizing the issuance and sale of electric system revenue bonds, approving a supplemental installment purchase contract, a trust agreement, a contract of purchase for the bonds, and approving related documents and official actions X. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the second opportunity to make a public comment on non-agenda items.

XI. STAFF/COUNCIL REPORTS
XII. ADJOURNMENT

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 12/17/2025
Item #: VII.2
File #: 0203-05 & 0201-01
Item ID: 2025-755
Title: Infrastructure Network and Server Equipment - Sole Source Contract Purchase Agreement and Budget Adjustment
Contact: Karl Grover 916-774-5145 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a sole source contract purchase agreement with E.F. Johnson Company in the amount of $113,500.67 to provide equipment and related services to upgrade the City radio system's network equipment. Sole source procurement is required as E.F. Johnson Company is the only provider capable of upgrading the equipment to minimize impact on City operations while maintaining system support long-term. Staff also recommends approval of a $40,000 budget adjustment to fully fund the project, which includes higher-than-anticipated equipment costs, required City IT labor, and a small contingency to ensure successful completion. This project is funded through the City's standard citywide technology allocation methodology.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt a resolution to approve a Sole Source Contract Purchase Agreement (3005121) with E.F.

Johnson Company for the City radio system's network upgrade project and authorize the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville;

2. Authorize the City Manager or his designee to approve change orders for the project, consisting with the contract terms, provided that the net cost of all change orders shall not exceed ten percent (10%) of the contract price; and

3. Adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment in the amount of $40,000 for the purchase of related E.F. Johnson Company equipment and services as well as City Staff labor.

BACKGROUND
The City 800MHz radio system's network equipment is approaching end of support. Since radio operations are dependent upon the network to provide high-performing and reliable services for business operations, it is critical to upgrade this network equipment. E.F. Johnson is the radio system's manufacturer and support provider. As such, they are solely equipped to ensure the network upgrade is effective and efficient in order to minimize impact on City operations while ensuring long-term system supportability. This project will upgrade critical equipment to ensure radio services maintain excellent service levels to support Citywide business operations.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Contract Purchase Agreement of $113,500.67, along with the $40,000 budget adjustment, is funded by the Citywide Infrastructure Network and Server Equipment Project using the City's standard allocation methodology for citywide technology replacement projects. Costs are shared among the IT Replacement Fund, Fleet Replacement Fund, Facility Rehabilitation Fund, Electric Fund, the Environmental Utilities rehabilitation funds, and the Transit and Transportation funds (including all applicable matching revenue.)

The budget adjustment is necessary to fully fund the project and covers higher-than-anticipated equipment costs, required City IT labor, and project contingency. With this adjustment, the revised total budget will be $145,000.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The Citywide Radio System Network Upgrade meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community

4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Karl Grover, Information Technology Program Manager
Hong Sae, Chief Information Officer
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 25-378

2. Contract Purchase Agreement

3. Ordinance 7019

4. Sole Source Approval
REVIEWERS:

Karl Grover, Information Technology Department - Infrastructure Solutions Created/Initiated - 11/21/2025 Matthew Sweet, Information Technology Department Approved - 11/24/2025 Hong Sae, Information Technology Department Approved - 11/24/2025 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 12/2/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 12/3/2025 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 12/5/2025 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 12/5/2025 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 12/6/2025 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 12/8/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 12/8/2025

RESOLUTION NO. 25-378

APPROVING A CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND E.F. JOHNSON COMPANY, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE WHEREAS, a Contract Purchase Agreement (3005121) for the Infrastructure Network and Server Equipment Upgrade project, by and between the City of Roseville and E.F. Johnson Company, has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is hereby approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to approve change orders for the project, consistent with the contract terms, provided that the net cost of all change orders shall not exceed ten percent (10%) of the contract price.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2025, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk

ORDINANCE NO. 7019

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-26

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2025-26, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for the Infrastructure Network and Server Equipment project.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the ordinance book, under the record of the ordinance, a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of such publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2025, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION
4105 6587 84001 500376 22,640 Increase budget for equipment costs and IT labor 4005 6587 84001 500376 720 Increase budget for equipment costs and IT labor 4065 6587 84001 500376 600 Increase budget for equipment costs and IT labor 6130 6587 84001 500376 2,680 Increase budget for equipment costs and IT labor 6230 6587 84001 500376 3,840 Increase budget for equipment costs and IT labor 6330 6587 84001 500376 3,040 Increase budget for equipment costs and IT labor 6511 6587 84001 500376 200 Increase budget for equipment costs and IT labor 6520 6587 84001 500376 200 Increase budget for equipment costs and IT labor 6001 6587 84701 500376 6,080 Increase budget for equipment costs and IT labor EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERSOUTTOTAL 40,000

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION
6511 4425 84001 500376 200 Increase budget for equipment costs and IT labor 6520 4420 84001 500376 200 Increase budget for equipment costs and IT labor REVENUES/TRANSFERSIN TOTAL 400
NET ADJUSTMENT 39,600

FUND BALANCE
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment DESCRIPTION
4105 3601 00000 000000 (22,640) Decrease IT Replacement Fund Balance 4005 3601 00000 000000 (720) Decrease Fleet Replacement Fund Balance 4065 3601 00000 000000 (600) Decrease Facility Rehabilitation Fund Balance 6130 3601 00000 000000 (2,680) Decrease Water Rehabilitation Fund Balance 6230 3601 00000 000000 (3,840) Decrease Wastewater Rehabilitation Fund Balance 6330 3601 00000 000000 (3,040) Decrease Waste Services Rehabilitation Fund Balance 6001 3601 00000 000000 (6,080) Decrease Electric Fund Balance FUND BALANCETOTAL (39,600)
Justification for Budget Adjustment:

The Information Technology Department is requesting a budget adjustment to increase funding for the Infrastructure Network and Server Equipment Project (Project 500376). The project was originally funded at $105,000 to replace aging radio system equipment and maintain reliable radio communications essential to Citywide emergency response and municipal operations.

This project is funded through the City’s standard allocation methodology for citywide infrastructure replacement projects, with costs shared among the IT Replacement Fund, Fleet Replacement Fund, Facility Rehabilitation Fund, Electric Fund, the three Environmental Utility funds, the Transit Fund, and the Transportation Fund (including matching revenue for the Transit and Transportation funds).

Because the costs of equipment and required IT labor are higher than anticipated, an additional $40,000 is needed to complete the project. With this adjustment, the revised project budget will total $145,000.

REQUESTER NAME & TITLE:

PREPARER NAME & TITLE:

DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:

REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
Updated 11/19/2025
Please complete the cells highlighted in yellow.

Karl Grover / IT Program Manager FISCAL YEAR: 2025-26
Paula Beckman / Budget Analyst ORDINANCE:

Information Technology

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 12/17/2025
Item #: VII.3
File #: 0203-05
Item ID: 2025-811
Title: Fire Department's Very High Frequency Radio System Upgrade - Contract Purchase Agreement
Contact: Karl Grover 916-774-5145 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a contract purchase agreement with Silke Communications Solutions Inc. in the amount of $580,639.42 to provide equipment, services, maintenance and support for Fire's Very High Frequency Radio System. Initial funding is included in the Fire Very High Frequency Radio System Upgrade Project budget and recurring support costs will be included in the Information Technology Operations Fund each fiscal year.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve a Contract Purchase Agreement (3005113) with Silke Communications Solutions Inc. for equipment, services, maintenance and support for Fire's Very High Frequency Radio System and authorize the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BACKGROUND
The Fire Department's Very High Frequency (VHF) radio system is outdated and provides an inconsistent user experience across its VHF channels. The Fire Department depends on the VHF radio system for daily interoperability with AMR, mutual aid during incidents with other agencies including CalFire and Rocklin Fire, fire station alerting capabilities and as an alternative backup to the City's 800MHz Radio System.

To address these needs, staff released Request for Proposals #12-036 in April with proposals due in August. Silke Communications Solutions Inc. was the sole bidder to provide a proposal. The RFP team completed a thorough evaluation process and selected Silke Communications' proposed solution.

This project will upgrade the VHF radio system to provide a reliable, consistent and supported solution to meet Fire's operational needs. In addition, the agreement includes a 10-year support term to ensure the new radio system is viable through at least 2035. Services include repair of failed equipment, antenna system replacement, annual preventative maintenance, routine software updates and system support 24x7x365.

FISCAL IMPACT
The total cost of this agreement is $580,639.42 over 10 years. The initial cost of the system upgrade is $245,320.95 and is budgeted in the Fire Very High Frequency Radio System Upgrade Project budget. The system maintenance over the course of 10 years is $335,318.47 and will be included in the Information Technology Operations Fund each fiscal year through 2035.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The Fire Very High Frequency Radio System Upgrade meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA.

No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community

4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Karl Grover, Information Technology Program Manager
Hong Sae, Chief Information Officer
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 25-361

2. Contract Purchase Agreement
REVIEWERS:

Karl Grover, Information Technology Department - Infrastructure Solutions Created/Initiated - 11/19/2025 Matthew Sweet, Information Technology Department Approved - 11/19/2025 Hong Sae, Information Technology Department Approved - 11/20/2025 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 11/21/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 11/24/2025 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 12/1/2025 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 12/3/2025 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 12/4/2025 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 12/4/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 12/4/2025

RESOLUTION NO. 25-361

APPROVING A CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND SILKE COMMUNICATIONS SOLUTIONS INC., AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, a contract purchase agreement (3005113) to provide services for the Fire Very High Frequency Radio System Upgrade, by and between the City of Roseville and Silke Communications Solutions Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is hereby approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2025, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk

Contract Purchase Agreement 3005113
Supplier Details:

Company Silke Communications Solutions Inc
Contact Bill Daugherty
Address 4025 Vista Park Ct Ste B
Sacramento, CA 95834
Submit your response to:

Company City of Roseville
Contact Erica Kaminski
Address Purchasing Division
311 Vernon St
Roseville, CA 95678
Phone (916) 746-1108
Fax (916) 746-1115
E-mail [email protected]
This Contract Purchase Agreement is sent for your review and acceptance. Notify the Buyer via email of any needed changes to the company name, address, and contact information. The Buyer will update the agreement prior to you signing the document.

Return signed copies of the agreement to the Buyer noted on the agreement. Alterations or modifications to the agreement are not allowed. Upon receipt of all necessary documents, the City will sign the agreement and return a fully executed copy to you. Receipt of the signed copy will be your notice to proceed with the work in accordance with the terms and conditions of the agreement. Work must not begin until the contract has been fully executed.

The following guidelines must be followed for the signature block on the agreement:

Sole proprietorship - By owner
Partnership - Any general partner
Corporation - Two options:
(1) A signature from the President and the corporate seal; OR (2) One signature from the Chairman of the Board, President, or any Vice President AND one signature from the Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer, or any Treasurer or Assistant Treasurer of the corporation
*General Manager, Office Manager and/or Sales Manager are not corporate officer titles. The agreement will be rejected if not signed in accordance with these guidelines.

Insurance requirements:

The City's insurance requirements are referenced on Attachment A of the agreement. By signing the agreement, you are confirming that your company has the minimum insurance limits required. 1 Docusign Envelope ID: 042CB392-A387-4B98-AFA9-26320B941B03

Contract Purchase Agreement 3005113
Agreement 3005113
Agreement Date 03-NOV-2025
Change Order 1
Change Order Date 11-NOV-2025
Revision 1
Agreement Amount 580,639.42 USD
Invoice To City of Roseville
Accounts Payable
311 Vernon St
ROSEVILLE CA 95678
Supplier Silke Communications Solutions Inc
4025 Vista Park Ct Ste B
Sacramento, CA 95834
Phone:

Fax:

Email:
(916) 774-5488
(916) 784-3796
[email protected]
Phone:

Fax:

Email:
(916) 245-6555
()
[email protected]
Description of
Labor,
equipment
and/or materials

THE VENDOR SHALL PROVIDE THE SERVICES CALLED FOR UNDER THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) 12-036 FOR FIRE VHF RADIO SYSTEM UPGRADE AND CONTRACTOR'S PROPOSAL THERETO TITLED "CITY OF ROSEVILLE FIRE VHF RADIO SYSTEM UPGRADE RFP#12-036 REVISION 2" DATED 9/30/25 (HEREINAFTER "PROPOSAL"). THE TERMS AND SCOPE OF WORK OF CITY OF ROSEVILLE RFP 12-036 AND CONTRACTOR'S PROPOSAL ARE

HEREIN MADE PART OF THIS AGREEMENT AND FULLY INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE.

START DATE: EXECUTED AGREEMENT
END DATE: 10 YEARS FROM CITY ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PROJECT

COMPLETION

PLEASE CONTACT KARL GROVER IN THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT AT 916-774-5145 OR [email protected] FOR ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS AGREEMENT.

Customer # Supplier # Payment Terms Freight Terms FOB Shipping Method 14981 Net 30 Freight on Board at the destination Destination Best Method Start Date End Date Confirm To
Erica Kaminski Phone 1-916-746-1108
Attention: Total Cost not to exceed the agreement amount without prior approval of the Purchasing office. 2 Docusign Envelope ID: 042CB392-A387-4B98-AFA9-26320B941B03

Contract Purchase Agreement 3005113

Contract Terms and Conditions

1. To the fullest extent allowed by law, Consultant shall defend, indemnify, and save and hold harmless City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers from any claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought forth, or on account of, injuries to or death of any person (including but not limited to workers and the public), or damage to property, resulting from or arising out of Consultant's willful misconduct or negligent act or omission while engaged in the performance of obligations or exercise of rights created by this Agreement, except those matters arising from City's sole negligence or willful misconduct. The parties intend that this provision shall be broadly construed. Consultant's responsibility for such defense and indemnity obligations shall survive the termination or completion of this Agreement for the full period of time allowed by law. The defense and indemnity obligations of this agreement are undertaken in addition to, and shall not in any way be limited by, the insurance obligations contained in this Agreement.

2. Consultant is an independent contractor, and shall not be considered an officer, agent, or employee of the City.

3. Without the written consent of the City, this Agreement is not assignable by Consultant either in whole or in part.

4. Time is of the essence of this Agreement.

5. At any time during the term of this Agreement, the City has the right to terminate this Agreement, provided Consultant is given thirty (30) days written notice. City's termination shall be without further liability to City; however, Consultant shall be entitled to all costs reasonably incurred prior to the date of termination. Consultant acknowledges that City may terminate this Agreement should funds not be appropriated by its governing body to continue services under this Agreement.

6. This Agreement may only be amended or modified in writing. It is integrated and contains the complete understanding of the parties.

7. All equipment, supplies and services sold to the City of Roseville shall conform to the general safety orders of the State of California.

8. Unless notified to the contrary, in writing, the City assumes that the Consultant has accepted the work in accordance with the plans and specifications (if any) and agrees to do the work in compliance with this Agreement. Any work product created for City pursuant to this Agreement is deemed owned by City.

9. All prevailing wages and fair employment practices must be adhered to. For prevailing wage contracts over $25,000, copies of certified payroll must be submitted with invoices. Prevailing wage rates may be obtained from the State Department of Industrial Relations and/or the following website address:
http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/DPreWageDetermination.htm . In compliance with Labor Code Section 1773.2, as may be amended from time to time, Contractor shall cause a copy of this website to be posted at each jobsite, as applicable.

10. Consultant agrees to the below insurance requirements:
a. Unless otherwise specified, the Consultant shall maintain the policies of insurance outlined in Attachment A, incorporated herein by this reference, in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement. The City of Roseville retains sole discretion in determining the types and proper levels of insurance coverage. 3 Docusign Envelope ID: 042CB392-A387-4B98-AFA9-26320B941B03

Contract Purchase Agreement 3005113

b. Form. Consultant shall submit a certificate evidencing such coverage for the period covered by this Agreement in a form satisfactory to Risk Management and the City Attorney, prior to undertaking any work hereunder. Any insurance written on a claims made basis is subject to the approval of Risk Management and the City Attorney. c. Additional Insureds. Consultant shall also provide a separate endorsement or section of the policy showing City, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers as additional insureds for each type of coverage, except for Workers' Compensation and Professional Liability. Such insurance shall specifically cover the contractual liability of Consultant.

The additional insured coverage under the Consultant's policy shall be primary and noncontributory, as evidenced by a separate endorsement or section of the policy and shall not seek contribution from City's insurance or self-insurance. In addition, the additional insured coverage shall be at least as broad as the Insurance Services Office (ISO) CG 20 01 Endorsement. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and limits shall be available to the additional insureds. Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be:
(1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this Agreement; or (2) the full coverage and maximum limits of any insurance proceeds available to the named insureds, whichever is greater.
d. Cancellation/Modification. Consultant shall provide thirty (30) days written notice to City prior to cancellation or modification of any insurance required by this Agreement. e. Umbrella/Excess Insurance. The limits of insurance required in this Agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and excess insurance. Any excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and noncontributory basis for the benefit of City (if agreed to in a written contract) before City's own insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured.
f. Subconsultants. Consultant agrees to include in its contracts with all subconsultants the same requirements and provisions of this Agreement, including the indemnity and insurance requirements, to the extent they apply to the scope of the subconsultants work.

Furthermore, Consultant shall require its subconsultants to agree to be bound to Consultant and City in the same manner and to the same extent as Consultant is bound to City under this Agreement. Additionally, Consultant shall obligate its subconsultants to comply with these same provisions with respect to any tertiary subconsultant, regardless of tier. A copy of City's indemnity and insurance provisions will be furnished to the subconsultant or tertiary subconsultant upon request.
g. Self-Insured Retentions. All self-insured retentions (SIR) must be disclosed to Risk Management for approval and shall not reduce the limits of liability. Policies containing any SIR provision shall provide or be endorsed to provide that the SIR may be satisfied by either the named insured or City. City reserves the right to obtain a full certified copy of any insurance policy and endorsements. The failure to exercise this right shall not constitute a waiver of such right.
h. Waiver of Subrogation. Consultant hereby agrees to waive subrogation which any insurer of Consultant may acquire from Consultant by virtue of the payment of any loss under a Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability or Automobile Liability policy.

All Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability policies shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of City, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers for all worked performed by Consultant, its employees, agents, and sub consultants.
i. Liability/Remedies. Insurance coverage in the minimum amounts set forth herein shall 4 Docusign Envelope ID: 042CB392-A387-4B98-AFA9-26320B941B03

Contract Purchase Agreement 3005113

not be construed to relieve Consultant of liability in excess of such coverage, nor shall it preclude City from taking such other actions as are available to it under any other provisions of this Agreement or law.

11. Consultant shall comply with all federal, state, local laws, ordinances, and policies as may be applicable to the performance of services under this Agreement. Failure to comply with local ordinances may result in monetary fines and cancellation of this Agreement.

12. In the event that the terms of any attachment or exhibit conflict with any terms of this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall control.

13. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. In the event that any signature is delivered by facsimile transmission or by e-mail delivery of a ". pdf" format data file, such signature shall create a valid and binding obligation of the party executing (or on whose behalf such signature is executed) with the same force and effect as if such facsimile or ".pdf" signature page were an original thereof.

14. If either party commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement or the performance thereof, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including but not limited to, court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorneys' fees. Any action arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in Placer County, California, regardless of where else venue may lie. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

15. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, successors, executors, administrators and assigns of the respective parties hereto.

16. If any of the provisions contained in this Agreement are for any reason held invalid or unenforceable, such holding shall not affect the remaining provisions or the validity and enforceability of the Agreement as a whole.

17. For purposes of this Agreement, the terms "Contractor," "Consultant," and "Supplier" are used interchangeably.

18. Consultant agrees that any and all information furnished by City shall be deemed proprietary and confidential. All such information, to the extent previously, presently, or subsequently disclosed to Consultant and/or processed and derived by Consultant services is the property of City and such property shall be deemed and treated as "Confidential Information" of City.

Consultant acknowledges that such Confidential Information may contain information provided and/or generated by third-parties. Consultant agrees that such Confidential Information shall not be disclosed to any third party without written permission from City, except as required by law. Consultant shall not use the Confidential Information except to perform Consultant's services as directed by City.

19. All facilities, devices, networks, and services used to store, deliver, process, backup or purge Confidential Information will employ administrative, physical, technical, and procedural safeguards and best practices at a level sufficient to secure Confidential Information from unauthorized access, destruction, use, modification, or disclosure. Such measures will be no less protective than those used to secure Consultant's own information of a similar type, and in no event less than reasonable in view of the type and nature of the information involved. It is the City's expectation that Consultant, at its own expense, shall perform annual audits for any data centers that house Confidential Information, using an independent third-party audit that meets industry standards applicable to the services under this Agreement, and provide the audit report or certification upon request to City.

20. Consultant will retain Confidential Information until deleted by City or City-authorized third 5 Docusign Envelope ID: 042CB392-A387-4B98-AFA9-26320B941B03

Contract Purchase Agreement 3005113

party, or for a time period mutually agreed upon by the parties to this Agreement.

21. Upon termination or expiration of this Agreement, Consultant will ensure that all Confidential Information is securely transferred to City within thirty (30) calendar days. Consultant will ensure that any transfer of Confidential Information is accomplished by methods that are compatible with the relevant City systems, and that City will have access to all Confidential Information during any such transfer. Consultant shall securely dispose of all Confidential Information when requested by City and Consultant will provide written notification to City once all Confidential Information has been securely disposed of.

22. Consultant shall report to City any data compromise or unauthorized access to Confidential Information within twenty-four (24) hours after Consultant discovers such data compromise or unauthorized access. Consultant will take commercially reasonable measures to address any such data compromise or unauthorized access in a timely manner. Except as otherwise required by law, Consultant will not provide notice to end users or other entities of any such data compromise or unauthorized access without written permission from City. Consultant will promptly reimburse City in full for all fees and costs incurred by City in any investigation, remediation or litigation resulting from any such data compromise or unauthorized access, including identity protection and restoration services for each person, who in the City's sole discretion, could be impacted by identity theft.

23. Consultant may not advertise that City is a client, list City as a reference or otherwise use City's name, logos, trademarks, or service marks without prior written permission from City.

24. Consultant acknowledges that services rendered under this agreement (including but not limited to service levels and operational levels) shall be performed in accordance with industry standards.

25. If the project referenced on this agreement is a Public Works project, then the following shall apply: No contractor or subcontractor may work on a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5. During the performance of this agreement, Contractor and its subcontractors shall have a continuing legal obligation to maintain current registration with the Department of Industrial Relations.

Contractor is hereby notified that this project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.

26. If the project referenced on this agreement is a Public Works project, then the following shall apply: Contractor must submit all claims as defined in and in accordance with the claim resolution process set forth in Section 9204 of the Public Contract Code. Each such claim must be sent to the City by registered mail or certified mail with return receipt requested and must contain reasonable documentation to support the claim. All claims must be received prior to acceptance of the work.

27. Contractor/consultant's duties and services under this agreement shall not include preparing or assisting the public entity with any portion of the public entity's preparation of a request for proposals, request for qualifications, or any other solicitation regarding a subsequent or additional contract with the public entity. The public entity entering this agreement shall at all times retain responsibility for public contracting, including with respect to any subsequent phase of this project. Contractor/consultant's participation in the planning, discussions, or drawing of project plans or specifications, if any, shall be limited to conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications. Contractor/consultant shall cooperate with the public entity to ensure that all bidders for a subsequent contract on any subsequent phase of this project have access to the same information, including all conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications prepared by contractor pursuant to this agreement.

28. Consultant certifies that Consultant, its employees, directors, officers, agents, subcontractors, vendors, and volunteers are not presently debarred, excluded, suspended, declared ineligible, voluntarily excluded, or proposed for debarment, exclusion, suspension, or ineligibility by 6 Docusign Envelope ID: 042CB392-A387-4B98-AFA9-26320B941B03

Contract Purchase Agreement 3005113

any federal, state, or local department or agency.

29. The Levine Act (Govt. Code, Section 84308) requires a Party (and its agent(s), if any) to a Proceeding before the City of Roseville that involves any action or consideration related to their contract, license, permit, or other entitlement for use, to disclose any campaign contributions made to City elected or appointed officers totaling more than $250 within the twelve (12) months prior to the City decision and while a proceeding is pending, and includes certain prohibitions on contribution activity thereafter. If applicable campaign contributions have been made by Contractor and/or its agent(s), Contractor is responsible for compliance, including for its disclosure obligations, if any, as further described at: https://www.roseville. ca.us/government/departments/city_clerk/transparency/levine_act.

30. This Agreement may be amended via change order, but only if such change order is made in writing, approved by the City, and signed by both parties.

31. CONSULTANT agrees to defend and indemnify CITY if, despite the parties intent and practice, any venue, agency, or court with competent jurisdiction determines that CONSULTANT and/or any of its agents, officers, employees, volunteers, independent contractors, or subcontractors, are characterized as employee(s) of CITY.

CONSULTANT and CITY agree that: (a) CONSULTANT is free from the control and direction of CITY in connection with the performance of the work; (b) CONSULTANT is providing services directly to CITY; (c) CONSULTANT has and will maintain at all relevant times a business license; (d) CONSULTANT maintains a business location that is separate from CITY; (e) CONSULTANT is customarily engaged in an independently established business of the same nature as that involved in the work performed hereunder; (f) CONSULTANT actually contracts with other businesses to provide the same or similar services and maintains a clientele without restrictions from CITY; (g) CONSULTANT advertises and holds itself out to the public as available to provide the same or similar services; (h) CONSULTANT provides its own tools, vehicles, and equipment to perform the services; (i) CONSULTANT has negotiated its own rates; (j) CONSULTANT set its own hours and location of work in accomplishing CITY's on-call needs; and (k) CONSULTANT has the right to control the manner and means of accomplishing the result desired and exercises its own expert independent judgement.

The supplier named hereon by the acceptance of this order agrees to the provisions of this document titled "Contract Purchase Agreement" and all accompanying terms, conditions, and attachments.

Roseville Business License No. ____________________________________ Contractor License No. ____________________________________________ DIR Registration No. _______________________________________________ Check mark the applicable company type below:
_____X______ Corporation
___________ Limited Liability Company
___________ Partnership
___________ Sole Proprietor
City reserves the right to withhold any payments to Consultant in the event of noncompliance with insurance requirements or if required by law.
7 Docusign Envelope ID: 042CB392-A387-4B98-AFA9-26320B941B03 1057507
00842372
PW-LRPage 61 of 1935
Contract Purchase Agreement 3005113

Information Technology T&C
REV 11/21/24 MC
8 Docusign Envelope ID: 042CB392-A387-4B98-AFA9-26320B941B03

Contract Purchase Agreement 3005113

ATTACHMENT A

HUMAN RESOURCES/RISK MANAGEMENT DIVISION

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

AGREEMENT OVER FORMAL BID LIMIT OR INVOLVING HIGH RISK ACTIVITIES Negotiated for Silke Communications Solutions, Inc. rev. 11/10/25 VB General - Required Coverage/Documentation
● General Liability: $1 Million per occurrence /$2 Million aggregate ● Automobile Liability: $1 Million combined single limit ● Workers' Compensation: Statutory *Must provide a Waiver of subrogation ● Additional Insured Endorsement (AIE) - General Liability policy: CG 20 38 04 13 or an equivalent, blanket endorsement or section of the policy. Endorsement shall cover the City of Roseville, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers as additional insured. ● Policies must be primary and non-contributory
● A 30 day notice of cancellation must be provided
● List certificate holder as: The City of Roseville - Insurance Compliance, PO Box 100085-R1, Duluth, GA 30096
Additional Liability/Insurance Requirements if required by Agreement (and marked below):

Construction:____
General Liability:
$2 Million/occurrence
$4 Million aggregate
Design Professional:____
General Liability:
$2 Million/occurrence
$4 Million aggregate
Professional Liability:
$2 Million/occurrence
Professional Consultant:____
Professional Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
IT Services:_X___
Professional Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
No auto required
Hazardous Materials:____
Pollution Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
Special Events/Caterers-Vendors:____
No auto required
No workers' comp required
Professional Counseling/ Psychological:____
Professional Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
No auto required
9 Docusign Envelope ID: 042CB392-A387-4B98-AFA9-26320B941B03

Contract Purchase Agreement 3005113

Pyrotechnics:____
General Liability:
$5 Million/occurrence
$10 Million aggregate
Auto - $2 Million/occurrence
Chemical/Environmental:____
General Liability:
$3 Million/occurrence
$6 Million aggregate
Pollution – $2 Million/Occurrence
Auto - $2 Million/Occurrence
Insurance Submission Process
The City of Roseville Human Resources/Risk Management Department uses a service called EBIX to manage our insurance certificate tracking.

How It Works
● The vendor's contact information is entered into EBIX. EBIX will contact the vendor to request proof of insurance.
● The Vendor can forward the request to their Insurance Agent(s) if necessary. ● Vendor/Insurance Agent submits insurance to EBIX by email to [email protected] or by fax to (770) 325-5727. After faxing or emailing the certificate, please DO NOT send the certificate by mail to EBIX. Please do not mail, email or fax any certificates to the City of Roseville. ● Once submitted, EBIX reviews the insurance documentation. If there are deficiencies, EBIX will send a follow up letter or email requesting additional information.

Questions Regarding Insurance Submission: Contact EBIX at (951) 652-4239 Questions Regarding Insurance Requirements Contact Risk Management at (916) 774-5202 10 Docusign Envelope ID: 042CB392-A387-4B98-AFA9-26320B941B03

Contract Purchase Agreement 3005113

Supplier
Signature:______________________________________________ Print Name:_____________________________________________ Title:__________________________________________________ Date: __________________________________________________ Supplier
Signature:______________________________________________ Print Name:_____________________________________________ Title:__________________________________________________ Date: __________________________________________________ City of Roseville, A Municipal Corporation
Signature:______________________________________________ Print Name: Dominick Casey
Title: City Manager
Date:__________________________________________________ 11 Docusign Envelope ID: 042CB392-A387-4B98-AFA9-26320B941B03 President and Chairman of the Board
EVP/GM, Corporate Secretary
11/19/2025
James Silke Jr.

TIM HOLT
11/20/2025










!"#$%$$

&'()*+,-./,*-.+01-.+,22)*3456.+/276,8'/*+*36/9.+/,6*+:;34*:206+ &2:4*+:2,*&<::6.=:>/,6*+:[email protected]+2

ABC DBEFG H

IEJC KLM#$%$$#NGOB EG NCO!EPBQRGS!RRTBFUVBKTW!OBI FB PXYX$$ZUI[ B\C F!E\RCEKW!GER!E BRGERBWG]TRR!CEC\\ BRR!GE!E^_ C!EB`aLBUI!R"GKCWBFCW LWWRHbbQQQ`\GO`KC`\GObQXKGEWBEWbT"GCFRb$%$$b%cbc`M`$$X]TRR!CX^_ C!EBXUVBKTW!OBX I FB `Fd`

aLBUIF! BKWRC""C\BEK!BRCEFFBC WSBEWRWLCWC BRTefBKWWGWLBNGOB EG gRCTWLG !Wh WGWC_BKB WC!E!SSBF!CWBRWBR#!EK"TF!E\EGW!dh!E\C""KGEW CKWG RCEF\ CEWBBRGdWLB! Ge"!\CW!GERWGKGS"hQ!WLBV!RW!E\BKGEGS!KRCEKW!GER!SGRBFehWLB^`i`\GOB ESBEW!E BRGERBWG]TRR!CjRCKW!GER!E^_ C!EB#CRQB""CRCEhRCEKW!GER!SGRBFTEFB RWCWB "CQ`

aL!RKG BRGEFBEKBRB OBRCRCEGW!KBTEFB WLBUIWLCWCRCKGEW CKWG G \ CEWBB# KGS"!CEKBQ!WLWLBBKGEGS!KRCEKW!GER!SGRBF!E BRGERBWG]TRR!CgRCKW!GER!E ^_ C!EB!R BkT! BF#!EK"TF!E\Q!WL BRBKWWG#eTWEGW"!S!WBFWG#WLBdBFB C"BVBKTW!OB G FB R!FBEW!d!BF!EWLBUICEFWLBRCEKW!GER!FBEW!d!BFGEWLB^`i`ABC WSBEWGdWLB a BCRT hQBeR!WBZLWWRHbbLGSB`W BCRT h`\GObG"!KhX!RRTBRbd!ECEK!C"XRCEKW!GERbRCEKW!GERX G\ CSRXCEFXKGTEW hX!EdG SCW!GEbT_ C!EBX TRR!CX B"CWBFXRCEKW!GER[`lC!"T BWGKGS"h SCh BRT"W!EWLBWB S!ECW!GEGdKGEW CKWRG \ CEWR#CRC"!KCe"B`

m"BCRBEGWBWLCWdG CEhC\ BBSBEWRG \ CEWROC"TBFCWnoS!""!GEG SG BhGTSTRW BG WWGWLBp!WhGd]GRBO!""BhGT KGS"!CEKBQ!WLBKGEGS!KRCEKW!GER!EK"TF!E\RWBR hGTLCOBWC_BE!E BRGERBWG]TRR!CjRCKW!GER!E^_ C!EB#!EK"TF!E\#eTWEGW"!S!WBFWG# FBR!RW!E\d GSSC_!E\EBQ!EOBRWSBEWR!E#G BE\C\!E\!Ed!ECEK!C"W CERCKW!GERQ!WL# ]TRR!CEBEW!W!BR#EGWW CERdB !E\WBKLEG"G\hWG]TRR!CG ]TRR!CEBEW!W!BR#CEFF! BKW"h GO!F!E\RTG WWGWLB\GOB ESBEWCEFBG"BGd^_ C!EB`

i!EKB B"h#

Mb$ob$%$$

iLCEEGEq!BRW
p!WhGd]GRBO!""B
mT KLCR!E\CEFqC BLGTRBJCEC\B
Docusign Envelope ID: 042CB392-A387-4B98-AFA9-26320B941B03

City of Roseville
Fire VHF Radio System Upgrade
RFP #12-036 Revision 2 | September 30, 2025
Contact Information
Silke Communications
4025 Vista Park Court Ste B, Sacramento CA 95834
Bill Daugherty
Technical Project Development
M (916) 420-3556
[email protected]
Statement of Adherent to RFP Services
Silke Communications is committed to abide by the scope of work and services required as described within this RFP. As of June 25, 2025, there are no addendums associated with this project.

Docusign Envelope ID: 042CB392-A387-4B98-AFA9-26320B941B03

Section 6.2
• All attachments are included in the Attachments section of the proposal.

Docusign Envelope ID: 042CB392-A387-4B98-AFA9-26320B941B03

Section 6.3
Company Overview and Qualifications
Silke Communications has been serving 2-way radio communications for over 60 years and now serves customers across the West. What was originally a small, family-owned business has become a national leader in wireless communications – thanks to devoted employees and loyal customers. Silke is now an employee-owned company, and it shows in our attentive service and dedication to successful, long-term partnerships with our customers. Silke is best known for having the largest NXDN Radio Network in the world, with over 95 repeaters and tower sites. Along with two-way radio, Silke specializes in Radio Dispatch Consoles, Microwave, and BDA/DAS applications.

Specific Services to be Provided by Silke Communications • Programming, provisioning and installation of repeater radios • Conduct fidelity testing on each repeater radio during programming • JPS programming and installation for SVM-12, SNV-3 and QMT-1 cards • Installation of lines and cables required for the Voter and VHF antenna systems • Training as required for repeaters and JPS modules
• Establish a transition and test plan for pre and post implementation • Provide continued maintenance support as described in the RFP • All work will be completed by Silke Communications. No subcontractors.

Northern California Operations Organizational Chart
o Employee staffing levels have remained consistent over the last (5) years.

Docusign Envelope ID: 042CB392-A387-4B98-AFA9-26320B941B03

Section 6.4
Experience and References
Completed Projects

1. Douglas County, OR 911 Dispatch Center
Full Zetron Dispatch Console Upgrade
December 2025
Nancy Lanley, IT Director
1036 SE Douglas Avenue, Roseburg, Oregon 97470
Phone: 541-440-4450

2. Glenn County, CA Police and Fire Network Upgrade
Radio communications contractor for the replacement Public Safety and Emergency Services radio infrastructure
June 2023
Jill Hughes, Administrative Services Officer
543 W Oak St, Willows, CA 95988
Phone: 530-934-1626

3. Fortuna County, CA Police Dispatch Center
Dispatch Center Install and Configuration for Fortuna County Police Department October 2023
Brendan Bryd – City Project Manager
621 11th Street, Fortuna, CA 95540
Phone:707-725-1469
Notable Active Projects

1. Douglas County, OR Police & Fire Dept. Network Upgrade Installation of new VHF/UHF radio and antenna system equipment on 18 sites countywide for EFJ.

July 2025 – January 2026 (Projected)
JR Mann – EFJ PM (Prime)
1440 Corporate Drive, Irving TX 75038
Phone: 808-497-9408

2. Santa Cruz County, CA Police & Fire Network Upgrade
Installation of new VHF/UHF/800 radio equipment on 17 sites countywide for EFJ August 2025 – December 2027 (projected)
JR Mann – EFJ PM (Prime)
1440 Corporate Drive, Irving TX 75038
Phone: (808)-497-9408
Docusign Envelope ID: 042CB392-A387-4B98-AFA9-26320B941B03

Section 6.5
Qualifications of Team
Supporting Personnel
Technical Project Manager | Bill Daugherty | Sacramento Office Senior Technician | John Neighbors | Sacramento Office
Technician | Zack Champion-Fritz | Sacramento Office
*No sub-contractors are planned as part of this project Name Bill Daugherty Company Silke Communications Solutions Title Technical Project Manager
Responsibility
■ Primary POC and Project Manager for the Douglas County project. Responsible for coordinating and facilitating the overall scope of work between EFJ and Customer as defined.

Professional Responsibilities:
■ Finalizing deliverables as requested by the client during and after the RFP process.
■ Review SOW provided by the client to ensure clarity on implementation plans and provide an official bid proposal.
■ Oversee implementation project and provide regular progress updates. ■ Build an implementation schedule that includes the logistics required to align with the Customer timeline.
■ Manage Silke Communications Solutions staff and resources for this project.

Experience
■ Over 30 years in wireless telecom (cellular) as a Senior Engineering Manager responsible for designing, building, and optimizing over 2000 new cell sites and managing over 7000 site upgrades from 2G to 5G. Staff consisted of 25 engineers and 4 managers including contracted project managers and 3rd party integration technicians.

Education
■ A.S RF Engineering Technology
■ Ericsson Certification for 4G/5G Base Station Technology and Network Parameters
■ Project Management Yellow Belt Training (TMO Internal) Docusign Envelope ID: 042CB392-A387-4B98-AFA9-26320B941B03

Name John Neighbors Company Silke Communications Solutions Title Senior Technician
Responsibility Role
■ Lead technician supporting this project
Professional Responsibilities:
■ Responsible for JPS and ATLAS radio equipment programming and installation at the communication facilities.
■ Provide customer training support as required by the RFP. ■ Primary contact overseeing the maintenance agreement if option is selected.

Experience • Lead technician responsible for overseeing quality control and maintenance of RF and mechanical systems.
• Expert in land mobile radio systems, ensuring optimal performance and reliability.
• Spearheaded projects in field service management, including equipment installation and mobile technology integration.
• Proficient in electrical theory and communication systems, enhancing team's understanding and efficiency.
• Demonstrated ability in electrical troubleshooting, contributing to quick resolution of technical issues.
• Managed customer service operations, ensuring high satisfaction and swift issue resolution.

Other Professional Experience:
• Programming of radios and repeaters.
• Tuning duplexers and various other cavities.
• Experienced with various RF test equipment.

Education • FCC GROL FRN# 0016469249
• EFJohnson Atlas Infrastructure
• EFJohnson Portable & Mobile Radio Tech 2 PMT2 – 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4 • EFJohnson Certified Armada Programmer PMT2 - 4.5, 4.6 • Zetron Max Dispatch
• Zetron Max Fire Station Alerting Systems
• Zetron Max Call Taking
• Ceragon Rollout Professional for IP-20G | Gx
• ETA Associate CET
Docusign Envelope ID: 042CB392-A387-4B98-AFA9-26320B941B03

Name Zach Champion-Fritz Company Silke Communications Solutions Title Technician
Responsibility Role
■ Technician supporting this project
Professional Responsibilities:
■ Responsible for JPS and ATLAS radio equipment programming and installation support at the communication facilities.
■ Provide customer training support as required by the RFP. ■ Backup contact overseeing the maintenance agreement if option is selected.

Experience • Experienced in installing, programming and servicing two-way radios and repeaters (analog, NXDN, DMR, P25)
• Experienced in NEXEDGE site deployment including programming radios and repeaters as well as the NEXEDGE SM-110 system
• Experienced with POC (push to talk over cellular) programming and database maintenance including iTalk and Diga Talk systems
• Proficient tuning duplexers, sweeping coax and troubleshooting RF equipment and systems
Other Professional Experience:
• Implemented and installed Providence Hospital Mindshare console system • Implemented and installed Bosch Semiconductor DMR IP multi-site connect system
Education 2010 – BS. Biopsychology University of California Santa Barbara Kenwood NEXEDGE system certification
Mindshare Dispatch Console certification
EF Johnson Atlas maintenance certification (To be completed Sep 2025) Docusign Envelope ID: 042CB392-A387-4B98-AFA9-26320B941B03

Name Christopher Knopp Company Silke Communications Solutions Title Technician
Responsibility Role
■ Technician supporting this project
Professional Responsibilities:
■ Cutover and testing support.
■ Backup contact overseeing the maintenance agreement if option is selected.

Experience • Expert in land Mobile radio systems, ensuring optimal performance and reliability
• Assist with project field service management, consisting of Installation of equipment and mobile integration
• Proficient in electoral theory and communications systems. • The ability of trouble shooting electrical and radio issue and to resolve technical issues quickly as possible
Other Professional Experience:
• Programming of radios and repeaters
Experienced with RF testing Equipment
Education • Experience over time with 2-way radio
• Internal training programs
Docusign Envelope ID: 042CB392-A387-4B98-AFA9-26320B941B03

Section 6.6
Project Understanding
Overview
This primary goal of this project consists of procurement, programming, and installation of new repeaters, voter receivers, and tone remote equipment for the Roseville Fire Department and Placer County VHF communications system. Dispatch utilizes Zetron ACOM consoles and requires provisioning of tone remotes within the scope of work. Based on the site walk and information provided, there are no immediate concerns that require special attention. Existing rack space, power source, RSV relay, and antenna system will be utilized. If a DC power source is required for the West Site, Silke Communications will provide the required equipment.

Communication Facilities
The radio network consists of (3) radio facilities:

1. PD Site at 1051 Junction Blvd. – TX/RX facility for all channels

2. West Site at Phillip Road – RX only facility for all channels

3. “New” East Site at Straunch Dr. – RX only facility for all channels • Relocation of the East Site is expected by the end of the year.

Repeater Design Requirements
Each facility has (3) active repeaters (RSV DSP, XPL CMD, XPL TAC1R) for a total of (9) repeaters operating in conventional analog VHF. The upgraded repeaters will be programmed to operate in the same configuration with power out levels not to exceed 110W. RSV DSP has a backup standalone non-voted repeater (RSV_BACKUP) with a manual toggle ability through the Zetron console at the PD site facility.

This functionality will remain intact. The ATLAS 1200 radios can operate in a voter-only configuration if desired. The planned repeater upgrades will maintain the existing configuration and have the capability to support a P25 Phase 1 system in the future.

Voter Comparator Requirements
RSV DSP and XPL TAC have existing SVN-12’s that will be repurposed. A new SVN-12 will need to be procured for XPL CMD. SVM-3 cards will need to be purchased (1 per SVN-12) and daisy chained to the QMT-1B units at the RX locations. A QMT-R rack will be installed at each site consisting of (4) QMT-1B units with (1) reserved as a spare. An additional empty QMT-R rack will be installed at each site as a backup measure for the DC-DC conversion module. (3) additional AC/DC power bricks will also be included as a backup power option. (1) Spare SVM-3 will be included in each SVN-12. It is understood the tone remote functionality of the ATLAS 1200 will be utilized in lieu of standalone tone remote units.

Docusign Envelope ID: 042CB392-A387-4B98-AFA9-26320B941B03

Zetron Console Interface
Existing Digi PortServer will need to change to the 4-port model to support voting capability on XPL CMD.

The Zetron Console will need to be configured to support the new voting channel and will require Zetron Support. It is understood that the ATLAS tone remote capability will be utilized within the scope of work.

Programming subscriber units are not required within this scope as Tone 26 at the West Site location will remain open.

Implementation Planning
An implementation and test plan will be developed Silke Comm for review and approval by the City of Roseville.

Additional Requirements
Silke will provide all technical documents and close-out package requirements upon completion. A 10- year maintenance agreement and pricing structure will also be provided for continued support.

Docusign Envelope ID: 042CB392-A387-4B98-AFA9-26320B941B03

Section 6.7
Project Plan
The project plan will consist of (5) phases
Phase 1 Alignment
• Pre-construction site-walk and meeting with all stakeholders to ensure scope of work is still aligned with proposals.
• Develop a formal schedule of work, confirm primary contacts as required, and establish a meeting cadence to track progress through system acceptance. This will be part of a project kick-off meeting.
• Agree on test call locations for cutover.

Phase 2 Provisioning
• Pre-provision radios and JPS equipment wherever possible and conduct bench testing.

Phase 3 Pre-Installation
• JPS components can be installed before cutover as there is space in the racks. The new repeaters and power supplies will require some removal to make space which is explained in the next section. Bench testing and radio programing will be completed in this phase.

Phase 4 Installation & Cutover
• Option 1(Sub migration - Preferred)
o Migrate subscribers temporarily to an alternate channel i.e., RSV to XPL. Remove and install all new equipment for both RSV channel setups, configure JPS, conduct coverage/call testing checks, confirm JPS functionality and coordinate with Zetron as required. Upon successful testing and connectivity, RSV DSP will be left on-air. RSV Backup can be completed during this window as a standalone non-voted system with testing and coverage checks to be completed per the RFP.
o Follow same procedure for XPL CMD and TAC except for a backup channel scope. o A 48-hour continuous downtime window per channel is projected (Day 1 install, Day 2 Cutover).
o This process eliminates the need for multiple MW work iterations, a faster fallback plan, and provides separate soak periods if desired.
• Option 2 (No sub migration more MW’s)
o MW#1 – PA Removal (lowest traffic time window).
 Remove existing PA’s for all channels and increase power of radios to 50W output.

This will result in a 3dB loss of signal for each transmit path. Downtime per channel Docusign Envelope ID: 042CB392-A387-4B98-AFA9-26320B941B03

is ~30 minutes and completed one at a time. This will create space to install the ATLAS 1200 radios and new JPS equipment for all channels in MW#1. o MW #2 – (lowest traffic time window).
 RSV DSP – Complete cutover to new radios at all (3) sites. Configure JPS equipment and complete visual inspection of JPS operation, coverage/call testing checks, and confirmation with Zetron Support on configuration. Downtime ~2-3 hours. For RSV DSP, the backup channel can be used to maintain operation. o MW #3 – (lowest traffic time window).
 XPL CMD will follow the same scope as RSV DSP with no direct backup channel.

This will be a pure outage during the MW for this channel. o MW #4 – (lowest traffic time window).
 XPL TAC will follow the same scope as RSV DSP with no direct backup channel. This will be a pure outage during the MW for this channel.
o RSV Backup can be completed without subscriber impact and is not voted. • Soak Period – (Applies to both Options)
o Once all (3) channels are operational and after successful testing at major intersections across East, Central and West Roseville, there will be a 14-day soak period to confirm satisfactory operation of the new system with Silke Communications.

Phase 5
• Confirmation of System Acceptance from the City of Roseville after the soak period. • Silke Comm or OEM to provide training on the new repeaters and JPS comparator system as required.
• As-Builts and Service Manuals will be provided as required by the RFP. All documents will be delivered within 30 days of project completion.
• 10 -Year Warranty and Maintenance agreement commences upon acknowledgement.

Docusign Envelope ID: 042CB392-A387-4B98-AFA9-26320B941B03

Section 6.8
Upgrade Cost Proposal
Component Manufacturer Material Details Cost
Repeaters Atlas 1200
Includes (11) repeaters and power supplies,
programming kit, and training. (1) Spare is inclued in this count.
$159,408.00
Voting JPS Includes SNV-12, SVM-3's, and QMT-R's in daisy chain IP based configuration. Spares included. $44,753.80
Port Server Digi TS 4 Fast Ethernet Connectivity $838.50 Consumables Various Power distribution strips, connectors and incidental cables. $750.00
Equipment Cost $205,750.30
Tax 7.75% $15,945.65
Equipment Total $221,695.95
Service Type Role Scope Details Cost
Project Management PM Includes meetings, scheduling, reporting, and logistics for the duration of the project. (1 PM, 25 hours, $245/hr) $6,125.00 Pre-install/Bench Testing Field Tech
Programming and testing all new repeaters, voting
modules, and ethernet switches. (1 tech, 2.5 days,
$175/hour)
$4,200.00
Installation Field Tech Includes provisioning of equipment and rack installation at all (3) facilites. (1 tech, 3.5 days, $175/hr) $4,900.00 Commissioning/Cutover Field Tech
Maintenance window cutover for new equipment.

Includes remote call testing and Zetron Disptach
connectivity with Dispatcher. Pricing is planned for (4) windows, but can be adjusted to upon request. (3
techs, 16 hours each, $175/hr.)
$8,400.00
Services Cost $23,625.00
Equipment Total $221,695.95
Equipment and Services Project Total $245,320.95
Equipment
Sevices
Docusign Envelope ID: 042CB392-A387-4B98-AFA9-26320B941B03

Maintenance Pricing Proposal
Project Pricing - Grand Total
Description Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 10 Year Total Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10
33,908.77 34,926.03 35,973.81 37,053.02 38,164.62
335,318.47
10-Year Maintennce
Agreement with 3%
escalator. Network
support details are
provided in Section

6.12. Includes (2)
antenna replacements
consisting of equiment
and services over the
course of the
maintenance
agreement and post
warranty support.

Maintenance
Agreement Pricing
29,250.00 30,127.50 31,031.33 31,962.26 32,921.13
Upgrade Total 245,320.95
Maintenance Total (10 Years) 335,318.47
Project Grand Total 580,639.42
Total Project Pricing Summary
Docusign Envelope ID: 042CB392-A387-4B98-AFA9-26320B941B03

Section 6.9
Required Statements/Documents
Non-Substitution Assurance
Silke Communications acknowledges and will abide by the terms in Section 5.0 of this RFP.

Conflict of Interest
This statement serves as confirmation that Silke Communications does not have a conflict of interest with any parties as defined in Section 10.4 of this RFP.

Indemnification & Insurance Requirements
Silke Communications can comply with the insurance requirements included in the Sample Contract and noted under Section 10.7 of the RFP.

Proprietary Information
Silke Communications confirms there is no information provided within this RFP submittal containing proprietary information.

Additional Attachments
Attachments A-E are included at the end of this document under the Attachments Section.

Docusign Envelope ID: 042CB392-A387-4B98-AFA9-26320B941B03

Section 6.10
Exceptions
• Silke Communications has not identified any expectations regarding the scope and language pertaining to the RFP scope of work or the Sample Contract as currently defined.

Docusign Envelope ID: 042CB392-A387-4B98-AFA9-26320B941B03

Section 6.11
Competency of Proposers
• Silke Communications has not incurred legal or financial scenarios as described in this section nor has Silke Communication had a contract terminated with a client due to contract breach.

Docusign Envelope ID: 042CB392-A387-4B98-AFA9-26320B941B03

Section 6.12
Technology Projects and Support
Network Support
Telephone Support
Silke Communications shall provide first-level support to the City of Roseville. This shall include providing the City of Roseville with access to 24/7/365 Tier 1 phone support and dispatch as required via 855-GoSilke (855-467-4553). Call back time is <60 minutes if not immediately answered.

On-site Support and Emergency Restoration Services
These services will be provided by Silke Communications during the 10-Year designated period. Silke Communications will provide on-site services including but not limited to:
• On-site fixed equipment troubleshooting/diagnostic/replacement support for ATLAS and JPS equipment. Annual Firmware/Software review and updates. Annual PMI which includes antenna sweeps and radio equipment related to the VHF/Tx/Rx communication system. Emergency restoration necessary to restore the communication network related to ATLAS and JPS equipment.

For emergency events, Silke Communications will be available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, including weekends and holidays. A qualified technician shall respond to requests for emergency service within the following time frames:

Training
Silke Communications and/or the OEM will provide training on equipment related to this RFP after system acceptance and will include common troubleshooting techniques. Technical support will also be available from OEM after the system is live. Additional training sessions will be available after the system is live once a quarter with 30-day notice.

Sample Report
Failure Type Time of
Notification Severity Response Time on Location
Major Any Time Service Impacting 6 Hours
Minor 0000 – 1200 Non-Service Impacting Same Business Day Minor 1201 – 2400 Non-Service Impacting Next Business Day Docusign Envelope ID: 042CB392-A387-4B98-AFA9-26320B941B03

• Typical Incident Report Log. Incident close-out packages per incident include additional detail and photos as relevant. These can be customized based on discussions with the customer to ensure expectations are met. Silke Communications would follow the same approach with the City of Roseville.
10-Year Roadmap
Atlas 1200 Radios
• The OEM will provide firmware updates as required at no cost. • There is not currently a future functionality roadmap for the Atlas 1200 repeater as it has only been in the marketplace for several years.
• Support is expected well beyond 5 years for this equipment. • 12-month standard warranty applies.

JPS
• 18-month standard warranty terms apply and will be included in the close-out documentation.

Silke Communications will provide support beyond equipment warranties as part of the maintenance agreement.

Facility Incident Type Date Reported Date/Time Onsite Resolution City of Roseville VHF System Incident and PM Report Log Docusign Envelope ID: 042CB392-A387-4B98-AFA9-26320B941B03

Attachments
Registration – Included
Attachment A – Included
Attachment B – Included
Attachment C – Included
Attachment D – Excluded (no subs)
Attachment E – Included
Docusign Envelope ID: 042CB392-A387-4B98-AFA9-26320B941B03

Docusign Envelope ID: 042CB392-A387-4B98-AFA9-26320B941B03

Docusign Envelope ID: 042CB392-A387-4B98-AFA9-26320B941B03

Docusign Envelope ID: 042CB392-A387-4B98-AFA9-26320B941B03

Docusign Envelope ID: 042CB392-A387-4B98-AFA9-26320B941B03

Docusign Envelope ID: 042CB392-A387-4B98-AFA9-26320B941B03

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 12/17/2025
Item #: VII.4
File #: 0704
Item ID: 2025-831
Title: Park and Park Facility Exclusions - Municipal Code Amendment Contact: Joseph Speaker 916-774-5325 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends the City Council introduce for first reading an ordinance amending Roseville Municipal Code Section 8.02.316, “Park and park facility exclusions." City staff is proposing modifications to the existing park and park facility exclusion ordinance to provide clarity to staff and the public and increase operational efficiencies.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council introduce for first reading an ordinance amending Roseville Municipal Code Section 8.02.316, “Park and park facility exclusions."

BACKGROUND
The City Council adopted Roseville Municipal Code § 8.02.316, “Park and park facility exclusion”, back in 2010 as an effective tool to address negative behavior in City park and park facilities. Roseville Municipal Code § 8.02.316 is used to ensure the City's parks and park facilities are being accessed and used in a safe way for their intended purpose. This section has not been amended since 2012 and staff recently looked at this section in conjunction with its current operations to determine where clarifications were needed and streamlining could be achieved. Staff proposes modifications to Roseville Municipal Code §

8.02.316 to provide clarity on the application, better define due process rights, and to accurately categorize modern park and park facilities as they exist in Roseville today.

The proposed changes include:
1) Definition Updates
Definition updates to reflect the robust park and park facility offerings that currently exist in the City of Roseville. Staff has divided out the various park and park facilities into three (3) categories (facilities, improved parks, and open space) to more accurately apply the exclusion. "Facilities" shall include libraries, sports facilities, including but not limited to the Courts at Gibson, museums, community centers, and pools, including all landscape, walkways, restrooms, and parking areas adjacent to such Facilities. "Improved Parks" shall include developed parks such as Maidu Regional Park, Mahany Park, Weber Park, Saugstad Park, Royer Park, the Vernon Street Town Square, Central Park, Harry Crabb Park, Denio Family Park, and any other developed park (excluding Facilities above) with any combination of the following characteristics: signage identifying the area as a park, perimeter walkways, restrooms, playground areas, picnic areas, multi-use fields, barbecues, ball fields, tennis and pickleball courts, water play features, multiuse turf, basketball courts, covered seating, disc golf, and sand volleyball, including all landscape, walkways, restrooms, and parking areas adjacent to such Improved Parks. "Open Space" shall mean any of the over 4,000 acres of primarily undeveloped natural areas consisting of features such as stream beds, native trees and shrubbery, bike trails, and other natural areas identified on the City of Roseville’s Open

Space Preserve Overarching Management Plan, including all landscape, walkways, restrooms, and parking areas adjacent to such Open Space. Exclusion from any one category results in exclusion from all of that category's locations in the City of Roseville, but not automatic exclusion from another category (i.e., if you violate a library computer policy, you are excluded from all Facilities, but not automatically from an Improved Park).

Staff has also clarified that with regional parks there is often a combination of multiple categories, and those different categories all share certain infrastructure (like parking lots, walkways, landscape areas, restrooms, etc.). So, the amendment clarifies that any exclusion from any category in a regional park results in an exclusion from all the shared infrastructure like parking lots, walkways, landscaped areas, restrooms, etc., in those regional parks.
2) Appeals Process
Better defining the process to appeal an exclusion, including removing the Roseville Police Department as the department who hears any appeals and instead appointing a management level employee outside the Roseville Police Department, to ensure police resources are better allocated. 3) Consolidation of Exclusion Lengths
Consolidating the length of the various exclusions from the current one (1) day, thirty (30) day, ninety (90) day, and one (1) year to a one (1) day and thirty (30) day, to better align with the most common lengths of exclusions actually issued, and to ensure accurate tracking. Subsequent violation of an existing exclusion shall result in a new thirty (30) day exclusion beginning on the date of the new violation. This allows for easier enforcement and tracking. This does not prevent the use of other enforcement tools, such as restraining orders or criminal prosecution, to ensure longer or even permanent prohibitions.

These proposed changes allow greater clarity for staff and the public and ensure Roseville park resources are utilized efficiently and effectively.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this request as this is a process already utilized and budgeted for and the proposed edits do not result in increased costs.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. A municipal code amendment meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community

6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Joseph Speaker, Assistant City Attorney

Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS:

1. RMC 8.02.316 Amendment (Redlined)(11.24.25)
REVIEWERS:

Joseph Speaker, City Attorney Department Created/Initiated - 11/26/2025 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 11/26/2025 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 11/26/2025 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 12/1/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 12/2/2025 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 12/2/2025 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 12/2/2025 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 12/3/2025 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 12/3/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 12/3/2025

ORDINANCE NO. ____
ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AMENDING SECTION 8.02.316 OF CHAPTER 8.02 OF TITLE 8 OF THE ROSEVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PARK AND

PARK FACILITY EXCLUSIONS
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. Section 8.02.316 of Chapter 8.02 of Title 8 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
§ 8.02.316. Park and park facility exclusions.

A. Any parks, recreation and libraries employee or police officer may exclude any person who, while present in a city park or park facility, violates any applicable ordinance, statute, posted rule or regulation, or city policy after being put on notice of same. For purposes of this section, city “park” and/or “park facility” shall have the same definition as “park” in Roseville Municipal Code Section 8.02.020, except for purposes of this section only, “park” and/or “park facilities” shall also be further divided into the following three (3) categories:

1. “Facilities”, which shall include libraries, sports facilities, including but not limited to the Courts at Gibson, museums, community centers, and pools, including all landscape, walkways, restrooms, and parking areas adjacent to such Facilities;

2. “Improved Parks” which shall include developed parks such as Maidu Regional Park, Mahany Park, Weber Park, Saugstad Park, Royer Park, the Vernon Street Town Square, Central Park, Harry Crabb Park, Denio Family Park, and any other developed park

(excluding Facilities above) with any combination of the following characteristics:
signage identifying the area as a park, perimeter walkways, restrooms, playground areas, picnic areas, multi-use fields, barbecues, ball fields, tennis and pickleball courts, water play features, multi-use turf, basketball courts, covered seating, disc golf, and sand volleyball, including all landscape, walkways, restrooms, and parking areas adjacent to such Improved Parks;

3. “Open Space” shall mean any of the over 4,000 acres of primarily undeveloped natural areas consisting of features such as stream beds, native trees and shrubbery, bike trails, and other natural areas identified on the City of Roseville’s Open Space Preserve Overarching Management Plan, including all landscape, walkways, restrooms, and parking areas adjacent to such Open Space.

A. Nothing in this section shall be construed to authorize the exclusion of any person lawfully exercising free speech rights or other rights protected by the state or federal constitutions unless that person is also committing acts that are not protected that violate a specific provision of the law that would allow for exclusion.

B. An exclusion from a park or park facilities under the provisions of this section shall be for the specified time periods following occurrence of the following violations in a park or park facility:

1. One (1) day: single or first time infraction(s) of park rules or city ordinances;

2. Thirty (30) days: arrest or citation for misdemeanor nonviolent crime (e.g., public intoxication), felony crime, or repeated infractions of park rules or city ordinances within the previous year;
90 days: two arrests or citations for misdemeanor nonviolent crime within the previous year,

or arrest for felony nonviolent crime (e.g., drug possession) within the previous year; A person who is excluded from a specific park and/or park facility category listed in Section (A)(1)-(3) above, shall be excluded for the applicable period above from all other park and/or park facilities in that same category, but not from a park and/or park facility of another category, unless they are separately cited for a violation in that location. For example, if a person is excluded from a location in the “Facilities” category, they are excluded from all locations listed in “Facilities”, but not from locations listed in “Open Space”, unless they are separately cited for a violation in that location.

For regional parks, including but not limited to, Maidu Regional Park, Mahany Park, the Soccer Complex, Royer Park, Central Park, Saugstad Park, and Pistachio Regional Park that include a combination of “Improved Parks”, “Open Space” and/or “Facilities” (as defined in Section A(1)-(3)), because they utilize shared parking lots, walkways, landscaped areas, restrooms, and other common infrastructure to each category and a clear beginning and end of each park or park facility category is not easily identifiable or definable, exclusion from any park or park facility category in a regional park shall amount to an exclusion of all shared parking lots, walkways, landscaped areas, restrooms, and other common infrastructure.

If a person is excluded from the “Open Space” category listed in Section 8.02.316(A)(3), they shall not be cited under this section for temporarily returning to the “Open Space” to retrieve their property within forty-eight (48) hours of being excluded, so long as they do not violate any other law, ordinance, policy, or rule while in the Open Space retrieving their property.

3. One year: three or more arrests or citations for nonviolent crimes or infractions of park

rules or ordinances within the previous year, or any arrest for any violent crime within the previous year.

Exclusions cover all parks and park facilities, regardless of the location of the incident causing the exclusion notice to be issued.

C. Written notice shall be given to any person excluded from any park or park facility under this section. The notice shall specify the date the exclusion begins and duration of the exclusion, shall identify the offending conduct leading to the exclusion, and shall inform the excluded person of the right to appeal the exclusion. The exclusion notice shall be signed by the issuing employee or officer and shall also state any penalties for failure to comply.

D. Any exclusion shall begin immediately upon the issuance of the exclusion notice and end at noon on the day following the end of the exclusion. If a person receives multiple overlapping exclusions, the exclusion period will start anew from the date the newest exclusion is issued, rather than be added to the end of any existing exclusion.

E. At any time within the period of a thirty (30) day exclusion, a person receiving a notice of exclusion may appeal the exclusion in writing to the director or chief of policeCity Attorney’s Office, by completing a request for appeal hearing form and returning it to the City Attorney’s Office.as applicable, for a waiver or modification of the exclusion for good cause. A hearing shall take place within five (5) business days of the request for appeal, or as soon thereafter as mutually agreed upon by the parties. The failure of the party requesting the appeal to appear at the hearing shall constitute a failure to exhaust administrative remedies and result in automatic denial of the appeal. If an appeal is timely filed, the exclusion shall be stayed until a final decision is rendered on the appeal. Upon review by the director, chief of police or designeeA management level city employee, that is not employed by the Roseville Police Department, shall conduct the appeal hearing. The the exclusion shall be upheld if the exclusion notice, any testimony provided at the hearing, or any other evidence

includespresented at the hearing indicates information indicating that more likely than not, the person committed the violation and if the exclusion is otherwise in accordance with the law. The director, chief of police or designeemanagement level city employee, shall have the authority to rescind or modify the terms of the exclusion for good cause, including reducing the length of the exclusion or the category of the park or park facility excluded from. The decision of the management level city employeedirector, chief of police or designee shall be final.

F. Both the parks, recreation and libraries department and the police department will maintain an accurate database of those persons excluded from the parks and other park facilities by their respective employees.

G. If excluded, a person shall immediately collect their belongings and leave the park or park facility. No person subject to the exclusion notice shall enter or remain in any excluded park or park facility at any time during the period indicated by the exclusion notice, unless the exclusion is stayed per Section E above or they are retrieving property in the Open Space per Section B above. Violation of this section may be charged as an administrative citation, infraction, or misdemeanor in the discretion of the city attorney.

SECTION 2. This ordinance shall be effective at the expiration of thirty (30) days from the date of adoption.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause this ordinance to be published in full at least once within fourteen (14) days after it is adopted in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, or shall within fourteen (14) days after its adoption cause this ordinance to be posted in full in at least three (3) public places in the City and enter in the Ordinance Book a certificate stating the time and place of said publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of _______________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 12/17/2025
Item #: VII.5
File #: 0709
Item ID: 2025-834
Title: 2025 HOME Program Income Funding Application
Contact: Trisha Isom, Danielle OConnell 916-746-1239, 916-774-5277 [email protected], [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of an application to the California Department of Housing and Community Development for the HOME Program Income Notice of Funding Availability in the amount of $500,000 to support the Owner-Occupied Rehabilitation Program, and authorize execution of the application, standard agreement, and any related grant documents. This action will have no impact on the City’s General Fund.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize and direct the Mayor, or her designee, to execute, in the name of the applicant, the HOME Standard Agreement, other HOME-related contracts and conveyances, and any subsequent amendments thereto.

Staff further recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute, in the name of the applicant, drawdown requests and any and all other documents as may be required.

BACKGROUND
On December 30, 2024, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) released a Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for the HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) Program, including activities funded solely with HOME Program Income (PI). HCD has recently updated its requirements for the use of HOME PI, now mandating that local jurisdictions submit an annual application to use these funds for eligible activities.

HOME PI consists of funds returned to the City when previously issued HOME-assisted loans are repaid.

When a homeowner repays a deferred or low-interest loan from an earlier First-Time Homebuyer or Owner-Occupied Rehabilitation (OOR) project, those repayments become available for new eligible activities. This revolving funding structure allows the City to reinvest repayments into additional home repair and rehabilitation projects, helping to preserve and enhance Roseville’s affordable housing stock over time.

The City is applying to use up to $500,000 in HOME PI funds for its OOR Program, which assists lowincome homeowners (earning up to 80% of area median income) in maintaining safe, energy-efficient, and accessible living conditions in their primary residences. Staff requests Council authorization to complete and submit the application (Draft HOME Application).

Under the standard HCD agreement, the Mayor is required to sign the Resolution and the Standard Agreement, while the City Manager, or their designee, is authorized to execute all other program-related documents. This structure ensures compliance with HCD requirements and supports the continued

preservation of the City’s affordable housing stock.

FISCAL IMPACT
HOME funding is provided as a reimbursable state grant to the City. HOME PI consists of funds that return to the City when previous HOME-assisted loans are repaid. The recommended action does not impact the City's General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) only applies to projects which have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)).

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

3. Enhance economic vitality
Respectfully Submitted,
Trisha Isom, Housing Manager
Danielle OConnell, Housing Analyst
Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 25-368

2. Draft HOME Application
REVIEWERS:

Trisha Isom, Economic Development Department - Housing Created/Initiated - 11/20/2025 Trisha Isom, Economic Development Department - Housing Approved - 11/20/2025 Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Department Approved - 11/21/2025 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 12/1/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 12/2/2025 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 12/2/2025 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 12/2/2025 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 12/3/2025 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 12/3/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 12/3/2025

RESOLUTION NO. 25-368

AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF THE HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS

PROGRAM APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING

AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE

IT AND ANY RELATED DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO PARTICIPATE AND COMPLY

WITH THE PROGRAM ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS:

A. The California Department of Housing and Community Development (the “Department”) is authorized to allocate HOME Investment Partnerships Program (“HOME”) funds made available from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”). HOME funds are to be used for the purposes set forth in Title II of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act of 1990, in federal implementing regulations set forth in Title 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 92, and in Title 25 of the California Code of Regulations commencing with section 8200.

B. On December 18, 2025, Department authorizes the use of HOME Program funds specifically derived from Program Income.

C. In response to the PROGRAM INCOME, the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation (the “Applicant”), wishes to apply to the Department for, and receive an allocation of, HOME funds.

THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED THAT:

1. In response to the above-referenced HOME Program Income, the Applicant shall submit an application to the Department to participate in the HOME Program Income and request up to Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000), of current funds, along with any additional future program income, to support the following activities and programs:

Owner-Occupied Housing Rehabilitation Program – The City of Roseville proposes to use HOME Program Income (PI) funds to provide financial assistance to low- and moderate-income homeowners for the repair, rehabilitation, and improvement of their primary residences. Eligible activities include addressing health and safety hazards, correcting code deficiencies, improving accessibility, and making energy efficiency upgrades to ensure safe, decent, and affordable housing located in the City of Roseville.

2. If the application for funding is approved, then the Applicant hereby agrees to use the HOME funds for eligible activities in the manner presented in its Application as approved by the Department in accordance with the statutes and regulations cited

above. The Applicant will also execute a Standard Agreement with the Department, any amendments thereto, and any and all other documents or instruments necessary or required by the Department or HUD for participation in the HOME program.

3. The applicant authorizes and directs Krista Bernasconi, Mayor, or her designee, to execute, in the name of the applicant, the HOME Standard Agreement, other HOMErelated contracts and conveyances, and any subsequent amendments thereto.

4. The Applicant hereby authorizes the City Manager, or their designee, to execute, in the name of the Applicant, drawdown requests and any other HOME Program form requiring a signature, as may be required by the Department from time to time.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2025, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
________________________
City Clerk

Application/Project Title
HOME Program Income
Org Name
City of Roseville
View Budget Worksheet
https://portal.ecivis.com/#/peerBudget/ADFCCC4A-A769-470B-BC18-B7559A81065A 11/7/25, 11:10 AM v414zcvd66
https://webportalapp.com/sp/task_item_primary_print/v414zcvd66?item_id=1&path=84391996 1/1

HOME Program Activities Application
Summary
I. Applicant Information
Applicant Name
Must be a City or County on NOFA Appendix A (list of State HOME-eligible jurisdictions), an HCDcertified HOME CHDO.

City of Roseville
Website Address
roseville.ca.us
Entity Type
City
Address
316 Vernon Street #150
City
Roseville
Zip Code
95678
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI)
(www.sam.gov)
W49TKZLUYCJ3
11/7/25, 11:13 AM v414zcvd66
https://webportalapp.com/sp/task_item_has_many_print/v414zcvd66/2?path=84391996-84392202 1/5

EIN#
94-6000409
Taxpayer Identification Numbers Worksheet - Complete the TIN Worksheet (https://gn.ecivis.com/GO/gn_redir/T/1roavjqunjp4c) (use download icon on top right of error page that will appear, and open with Acrobat)
TIN
GOV TIN.pdf
II. Authorized Representative Information
First Name
Krista
Last Name
Bernasconi
Job Title
Must be a position in Authorizing Resolution that can sign HOME documents.

Mayor
Address
311 Vernon Street
City
Roseville
Zip Code
95678
Phone#
916-746-1350
11/7/25, 11:13 AM v414zcvd66
https://webportalapp.com/sp/task_item_has_many_print/v414zcvd66/2?path=84391996-84392202 2/5

Email
[email protected]
III. Applicant Contact Information
Name
(do not list admin. sub or subrecipient)
Danielle O'Connell
Ext.

Type
Desk
Job Title
Housing Analyst
Organization
City of Roseville
Address
316 Vernon Street #150
City
Roseville
Zip Code
95678
Phone#
916-774-5277
11/7/25, 11:13 AM v414zcvd66
https://webportalapp.com/sp/task_item_has_many_print/v414zcvd66/2?path=84391996-84392202 3/5

Ext.

Type
Desk
Email
[email protected]
IV. Unit Information - HOME Program Activities
First-Time Homebuyer
HOME-Assisted Units
Total Units
Target Population*
Owner-Occupied Rehabilitation
HOME-Assisted Units
5 Total Units
5 Target Population*
1, 2, 4, 7, 9, 11,
11/7/25, 11:13 AM v414zcvd66
https://webportalapp.com/sp/task_item_has_many_print/v414zcvd66/2?path=84391996-84392202 4/5

*Target Population Codes

1. Physically Disabled 2. Persons with AIDS 3. Youths 4. Single Adults 5. Single Men 6. Single Women 7. Families 8. Farm Workers 9. Seniors 10. Mentally Ill 11. Veterans 12. Victims of Domestic Violence 13. Substance Abusers 14. Dually Diagnosed 15. Homeless 16. Other Tenant-Based Rental Assistance
HOME Units
Total Units
Target Population*
11/7/25, 11:13 AM v414zcvd66
https://webportalapp.com/sp/task_item_has_many_print/v414zcvd66/2?path=84391996-84392202 5/5

2025 HOME Program Activities MAIN PI
Applicant Name
Must be a City or County
City of Roseville
Is the applicant a City or County?
City
Program Title
Please indicate here the title of your program(s), such as "HOME First-Time Homebuyer and Owner-Occupied Rehabilitation Programs"
Owner Occupied Rehabilitation
Single Audit Compliance Requirement
In accordance with the State HOME Regulations, Section 8204(a)(1)(D)(iv), all cities and counties are eligible only if in compliance with federal Single Audit submittal requirements. The current Single Audit submittal regulations are at 2 CFR Sections 200.500 - 200.512.

Were you required to submit a Single Audit for any of the last 3 Fiscal Years to the State Controller's Office?
Yes - we were required to submit.

Which fiscal year was your last-filed Single Audit?
FY 2023-2024
Upload the last-filed Single Audit
City of Roseville Single Audit Final 03-28-25.pdf
11/7/25, 11:14 AM v414zcvd66
https://webportalapp.com/sp/task_item_has_many_print/v414zcvd66/3?path=84391996-84392358 1/3

Were there any findings on the last-filed Single Audit? No
NOTE: If applicant is not in submittal compliance, applicant is not eligible to proceed with this HOME application.

Authorizing Resolution
A Resolution granting authority to make an application to the HOME Program, duly executed by the governing board of the local jurisdiction, CHDO or Tribal Entity, is required for submission of the application. An executed resolution must be included with every application submitted to the Department no later than the application deadline. The resolution must authorize:
• submittal of the application and the execution of the HOME Standard Agreement; • the activity(ies) being proposed in the application;
• the amount of HOME funds being requested; and
• signature authority for HOME documents.

Is Applicant a city that has an ordinance to allow a position other than Mayor or Mayor pro tempore to sign contracts?
NO
Upload the ordinance that specifies who is authorized to sign a standard agreement.

If Applicant is a city, the Mayor or Mayor pro tempore must be the only position included on the Authorizing Resolution, regarding who can sign the HOME Standard Agreement, although other positions may be listed regarding who can sign other documents required by the program.

Download the Authorizing Resolution Instructions and Sample (https://gn.ecivis.com/GO/gn_redir/T/1roavjqunjp4c), and have the governing body produce a NOFA Program Activities application Authorizing Resolution that conforms with the stated requirements.
11/7/25, 11:14 AM v414zcvd66
https://webportalapp.com/sp/task_item_has_many_print/v414zcvd66/3?path=84391996-84392358 2/3

Completed and signed Authorizing Resolution form:

Signatory Identities Form
For every authorized position/title in the Authorizing Resolution submitted with the HOME Application, the Department requires that the name of the person(s) currently occupying that/those position(s)/title(s) be kept on file at the Department. This allows the Standard Agreement to be signed by the current occupant(s) of the named position(s)/title(s) to sign on behalf of the Applicant.

Complete the Signatory Identities form (https://gn.ecivis.com/GO/gn_redir/T/1roavjqunjp4c) Signed Signatory Identities form:

Exhibit A3 Signatory Identities Form for HOME Program Activities application.pdf Applicant Certification and Commitment of Responsibility Form Complete the Applicant Certification and Commitment of Responsibility form (https://gn.ecivis.com/GO/gn_redir/T/1roavjqunjp4c)
Signed Applicant Certification and Commitment of Responsibility form:
11/7/25, 11:14 AM v414zcvd66
https://webportalapp.com/sp/task_item_has_many_print/v414zcvd66/3?path=84391996-84392358 3/3

Application/Project Title
Owner Occupied Rehabilitation HOME Program Income
Org Name
City of Roseville
11/7/25, 11:07 AM 2zw5i161ze
https://webportalapp.com/sp/task_item_primary_print/2zw5i161ze?item_id=1&path=84433128 1/1

Applicant Name
Must be a City or County
City of Roseville
Applicant Type
City
Program Activity
Which Program Activity is this SUB application for?
Owner-Occupied Rehabilitation
Activity Description
Provide a brief narrative below describing the proposed activity and how the funds will be used (location, use of funds, units proposed, income levels, funding sources, type of loan).

The City of Roseville proposes to use $500,000 in HOME Program Income (PI) funds to support its Owner-Occupied Rehabilitation Program. The program will serve owner-occupied homes located within the City of Roseville, focusing on properties owned by low- and moderate-income households (up to 80% of area median income).

Use of Funds: $450,000 will be dedicated to project activities, including repair, rehabilitation, and improvements addressing health and safety hazards, code deficiencies, accessibility modifications, and energy efficiency upgrades. $50,000 will be allocated for administrative costs, including program management, application processing, inspections, compliance monitoring, and reporting.

Units Proposed: The program anticipates assisting approximately 5 homes.

Funding Sources: The program will utilize HOME PI funds, which are revolving funds generated from previous HOME-assisted projects.

Type of Loan: Assistance will be provided as deferred, zero interest loans secured by a recorded deed of trust, ensuring long-term affordability of the rehabilitated homes.

Program Operation Capacity
A. Capacity to Implement the HOME OOR Program
Please answer the following questions and provide the required attachments. 11/7/25, 11:07 AM 2zw5i161ze
https://webportalapp.com/sp/task_item_has_one_print/2zw5i161ze/2?path=84433128 1/6

a) Do you plan on administering the proposed HOME OOR Program with your own staff (from HOME award through long-term compliance monitoring, if applicable)? YES
b) Do you plan to hire an administrative subcontractor or subrecipient to assist with the proposed activity?
NO
Please explain why an administrative subcontractor or subrecipient will not be needed.

The City of Roseville has been operating the Owner-Occupied Rehabilitation Program for over 20 years and has always had in house staff manage the program and funds. c) What is the estimated cost to implement this OOR Program? $50,000.00
d) If the estimated cost to implement this OOR Program exceeds the maximum of 24% of the HOME loan/grant total, for HOME OOR Activity Delivery Costs, and available HOME General Administration funds, how will the difference be funded? B. Program Team Composition
In the form below, list all team members who will be responsible for the implementation and operation of the HOME Program Activity and/or supervises the work of an administrative subcontractor/subrecipient, if one is proposed. Briefly describe the roles and responsibilities of each member. For applicant staff only, estimate the amount of hours per month dedicated to program administration. Members include, but are not limited to: key employees of the applicant, administrative subcontractor/subrecipient, rehabilitation specialists, and loan underwriters.

This information will be used to assist the Department of Housing and Community Development (Department) in understanding the proposed program. Include each person’s phone number and e-mail address. Fill in the box in the last box only if that person is an employee of an administrative subcontractor or subrecipient, with their organization's name.

Program Team
Team Member # 1
11/7/25, 11:07 AM 2zw5i161ze
https://webportalapp.com/sp/task_item_has_one_print/2zw5i161ze/2?path=84433128 2/6

Name
Danielle O'Connell
Roles and Responsibilities
City of Roseville staff will manage all aspects of the Owner-Occupied Rehabilitation (OOR) Program to ensure effective and compliant implementation including overseeing program operations, monitoring budgets, ensuring compliance with HOME Program requirements and preparing quarterly reports. They will complete all application Intake & Eligibility and determine property eligibility. They will coordinate inspections, supervise creation of scopes of work, obtain bids, and monitor rehabilitation activities to ensure quality, timeliness, and compliance with program standards. All loan & compliance management will also be completed by this staff including preparing loan documents, monitoring deferred loans, and enforcement of long-term affordability requirements. They will also serve as the primary point of contact for homeowners, providing guidance on eligible repairs, program policies, and project progress.

Estimated Monthly Hours
50 Telephone
916-774-5277
Email Address
[email protected]
Subcontractor/Subrecipient Name
N/A
Team Member # 2
Name
Trisha Isom
Roles and Responsibilities
Supervise the Analyst managing the OOR program and serve as back up if necessary.

Estimated Monthly Hours
5 11/7/25, 11:07 AM 2zw5i161ze
https://webportalapp.com/sp/task_item_has_one_print/2zw5i161ze/2?path=84433128 3/6

Telephone
916-746-1239
Email Address
[email protected]
Subcontractor/Subrecipient Name
Team Member # 3
Name
Roles and Responsibilities
Estimated Monthly Hours
Telephone
Email Address
Subcontractor/Subrecipient Name
Team Member # 4
Name
11/7/25, 11:07 AM 2zw5i161ze
https://webportalapp.com/sp/task_item_has_one_print/2zw5i161ze/2?path=84433128 4/6

Roles and Responsibilities
Estimated Monthly Hours
Telephone
Email Address
Subcontractor/Subrecipient Name
Do you have more program team members to add?
NO
Program Service Area
In the form below, enter the eligible jurisdiction in which your activity is proposed to be completed. See Appendix A (https://gn.ecivis.com/GO/gn_redir/T/1e1lbig6z3c2t) of the NOFA for a list of State HOME-eligible jurisdictions.

Jurisdiction's Area Description
The City of Roseville is an established community in California with a mix of older and newer neighborhoods. Many of its older homes are in need of rehabilitation to maintain safe, healthy, and accessible living conditions. The Owner-Occupied Rehabilitation Program will help preserve the City’s affordable housing stock and ensure long-term housing stability for low- and moderateincome residents.

Prior Experience with Programs
Submit a Prior Experience summary using the Exhibits B4 and B5 below (https://gn.ecivis.com/GO/gn_redir/T/1e1lbig6z3c2t). See the instructions with these forms.

Exhibit B4
Exhibit B4.pdf
11/7/25, 11:07 AM 2zw5i161ze
https://webportalapp.com/sp/task_item_has_one_print/2zw5i161ze/2?path=84433128 5/6

Exhibit B5
Exhibit B5.pdf
Activity Feasibility
Program Guidelines
Complete Appendix B6 (https://gn.ecivis.com/GO/gn_redir/T/1e1lbig6z3c2t) in this Application.

Applicants must submit a separate Exhibit B6 for each program activity being applied for.

Signed Exhibit B6
11/7/25, 11:07 AM 2zw5i161ze
https://webportalapp.com/sp/task_item_has_one_print/2zw5i161ze/2?path=84433128 6/6

HOME 202-202 NOFA Prior Experience form Page 1 of 2
EXHIBIT B4
Prior Experience with Programs – Same Activity
In each line below, list the number of units assisted by the applicant with specific HOME, local, State or other federal funding source(s) in one of the seven calendar years, 201 – 202, plus 202 year-to-date for the same activity as the “Activity Applied For” on this form.

Do not count the same units/families in more than one year, even if income was recertified (e.g. Section 8 and TBRA). Do not count twice if assisted by two programs (e.g. TBRA and Section 8). List no more than 10 entries on this form. A minimum of 2 units per year is required for points.

Remember: a separate Exhibit B4 must be submitted for each program activity for which you are applying. Each activity is scored separately.

ACTIVITY APPLIED FOR:

Calendar
Year
Assisted
Units
(minimum
2 units/yr
to count
for points)
Funding Source(s)
Example: HOME, CDBG, CalHome,
RDA, or other (provide
name/names if other). List all
sources for a calendar year.

Program Name
(e.g. Owner-Occupied Rehab or
First-Time Homebuyer Program)
Location
City/County
202
202
202
20
20
201

201
201
Owner Occupied Rehabilitation
5 HOME, CDBG Owner Occupied Rehab City of Roseville
3 HOME, CDBG & CalHOME Owner Occupied Rehab City of Roseville 5 CDBG Owner Occupied Rehab City of Roseville
7 HOME, CDBG Owner Occupied Rehab City of Roseville
4 HOME Owner Occupied Rehab City of Roseville
5 HOME, CDBG Owner Occupied Rehab City of Roseville
3 CDBG Owner Occupied Rehab City of Roseville
9 HOME, CDBG Owner Occupied Rehab City of Roseville

HOME 2022-2023 NOFA Prior Experience form Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT B5
Prior Experience with Programs – Different Activity
Single-Family Experience
In each line below, list the number of units assisted by the applicant with specific HOME, local, State and/or other federal funding sources in one of the seven calendar years, 2017–2023, plus 2024 year-to-date, for different activities than the “Activity Applied For” on this form. Do not count the same activities listed in Exhibit B4, and do not count the same units in more than one year. Use the year each project (e.g., FTHB) was completed. List no more than ten entries on this form. A minimum of two units per year for program activity-type housing activities (i.e., OOR, FTHB down payment/gap assistance, TBRA) is required for credit for any given year. More than one entry per year is allowed for credit, if the activity type (Program Name) is different from other entries for that same calendar year. List programs (e.g., OOR) with multiple funding sources for a given year on one line.

Other Housing and Community Development Experience
Also list completed projects (one per line) for other housing and community development activities, such as infrastructure, parks, community centers, multi-family housing projects, etc. Do not list stand-alone studies or public service activities. Each such project is counted as one year of experience, so multiple projects in the same year each count as a year of experience (list on separate lines).

Remember: A separate Exhibit B5 must be submitted for each program activity for which you are applying. Each activity is scored separately.

ACTIVITY APPLIED FOR:

Assisted
Units (for
program
activity-type
housing
only, a
minimum of
two units
per yr is
required for
credit)
Funding Source(s)
Example: HOME, CDBG, CalHome,
RDA, other (provide name/names if
other). List all sources for a given
project or program type for each
calendar year.

Program Name
(e.g., Owner-Occupied Rehab or
First-Time Homebuyer Program)
Location
City/County
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
Owner Occupied Rehabilitiation 157 City of Roseville 6 City of Roseville 27 City of Roseville 65 City of Roseville 6 City of Roseville 19 City of Roseville 58 City of Roseville 3 City of Roseville CDBG CDBG CDBG CDBG CDBG Housing Successor Bonds HOME Multifamily Gap Financing Acquisition for transitional housing Community Facilities - added security to permanent s Multifamily Gap Financing CommunityFacilities-roof-rehab-of-transitional-housin Community Facilities - added solar to low-income ho
Multifamily Gap Financing First Time Homebuyer Local Housing Trust Funds Page 122 of 1935 HOME 2022-2023 NOFA Program Activities Application
Exhibit B6
HOME Program Guidelines Certification
Applicants for HOME Program Activities are not to submit proposed or previously-approved Program Guidelines for each Program Activity being applied for.

Instead, Applicants must certify the following:

Applicant hereby certifies that if awarded, it will use the State HOME Program current “Best Practices” Guideline template(s) for any awarded HOME Program Activities, and any HOME Program Income and Recaptured Funds-funded Program Activities.

It is further acknowledged and understood that the Applicant is required to submit for approval its completed HOME Program Guidelines as part of its General Setup Conditions for each HOME Program Activity, and that General Setup Conditions must be approved by HOME Program Representative prior to operation of each activity. HOME Program Guidelines templates are available upon request from your assigned HOME Program Activities Representative.

Applicant: ____________________
Certified by (name): ___________________
Title of certifying Applicant employee or official: _______________________ Signature: _______________________
Date certified: _____________________
City of Roseville Dominick Casey City Manager Page 123 of 1935 Applicant Certification and Commitment of Responsibility

10. HOME 2024 NOFA Applicant Certification and Commitment of Responsibility

9. The person authorized in the resolution must also certify to knowledge of the responsibilities assumed when contracting with the State for HOME funds. The individual must also certify that the information, statements, and attachments contained in the application are, to the best of their knowledge and belief, true and correct.

By signing this certification, the applicant is also authorizing the Department to contact any agency that may assist in determining applicant capability, whether or not that agency is named in the application. As the official designated by the governing body, I hereby certify that if approved by the Department for a HOME 2024 NOFA funding allocation, the assumes the responsibilities specified in the HOME Regulations.

1. It possesses the legal authority to apply for the allocation and to execute the proposed program or project;

2. 5.

It has staff available or has committed to hiring staff able to operate a local HOME program or project and oversee the work of an administrative subcontractor or subrecipient, if any; It will use HOME funds as grants solely for authorized activities; It has resolved any audit findings for prior Department or federally-funded housing or community development projects or programs to the satisfaction of the Department or federal agency by which the finding was made;

3. It is not currently suspended or debarred from receiving federal funds;

4. It is currently in compliance with the submittal requirements of Office of Management and Budget Circular 2 CFR 200.512, pursuant to the Single Audit Act of 1984, P.L. 98-502, and the Single Audit Act amendments of 1996, P.L. 104-156;
There are no pending lawsuits that would impact the implementation of this program;

6. It will follow the State Relocation Plan and the federal Uniform Relocation Act requirements;

7. It will comply with all statutes and regulations governing the HOME Program, including all State and federal requirements;

8. It is waiving any claim of confidentiality and consents to the disclosure of submitted material upon receipt of a PRA request;
If a CHDO, it will fulfill the role of sole project developer in the administration of the proposed activity/ies.

I authorize the Department of Housing and Community Development to contact any agency, whether or not named in this application, which may assist in determining the capability of the Applicant. All information contained in this application is acknowledged to be public information. (This certification must be signed by a person whose position is authorized in the Resolution).

Signature
Type Name
Title
Date

12. 11. If applying as a CHDO, that it is submitting an application for Department certification for this Program or Project, and that its organization is currently in compliance with section 8204.1 of the State HOME Regulations.

HOME 2024 NOFA
Applicant Certification and Commitment of Responsibility Page 1 of 1 I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that the information provided herein is true, complete, and accurate. I am aware that the provisions of false, fictitious, or fraudulent information, or the omission of any material fact, may subject me to criminal, civil, or administrative consequences including, but not limited to violations of U.S. Code Title 18, Sections 2, 1001, 1343 and Title 31, Section 3729-3730 and 3801-3812.

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 12/17/2025
Item #: VII.6
File #: 0709-01
Item ID: 2025-888
Title: HOUSING AUTHORITY/CITY COUNCIL - Quarterly Status Update 3rd Quarter 2025 Contact: Suzi Cook-Turner 916-774-5414 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends City Council, acting as the Roseville Housing Authority Board, receive a status report on the Housing Authority’s Housing Choice Voucher Program for the Third Quarter of 2025. This report is for informational purposes only and has no impact on the City's General Fund.

RECOMMENDATION
The City Council, acting as the Roseville Housing Authority Board, is not required to take any action on this item. This quarterly report is for informational purposes only.

BACKGROUND
Pursuant to the bylaws of the Roseville Housing Authority (RHA), the City Council, acting as the governing board for the Housing Authority, holds its quarterly meeting the first Wednesday of March, June, September, and December, or as soon as possible thereafter. Staff has prepared the following status report regarding lease-up activity for the Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) Program. The HCV Program provides income-qualified households in Roseville and Rocklin with rental assistance using funding from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). This assistance is utilized at rental units that meet program-specific housing standards, are owned by a willing property owner, and are within Roseville or Rocklin city limits. This rental assistance ensures that the household can afford to live in safe and decent housing. During the third quarter of 2025, RHA provided rental assistance to a total of 839 households. This included 680 vouchers in Roseville, 144 in Rocklin, and 15 in other jurisdictions.

Roseville Housing Authority is authorized to provide rental assistance to 845 households through the Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) program. This allocation includes several specialized voucher types designed to meet the needs of vulnerable populations:
• 37 Emergency Housing Vouchers (EHV): For individuals and families experiencing homelessness or at risk of homelessness.
• 75 Non-Elderly Disabled (NED) Vouchers: For households with a head of household or partner who is non-elderly and disabled.
• 43 Mainstream Vouchers: For non-elderly households with a disabled head of household or partner who are transitioning out of institutional or segregated settings, currently homeless, or at risk of homelessness.
• 100 HUD-Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing (VASH) Vouchers: For veteran households referred by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), aiding with housing search, paperwork, and long-term housing stability.
• 20 Foster Youth to Independence (FYI) Vouchers: For former foster youth ages 18–24 who are

homeless or at risk of homelessness as they transition out of foster care.

RHA remains committed to increasing affordable housing opportunities in the Roseville/Rocklin area. Key activities in the third quarter of 2025 include:
• Project-Based Voucher (PBV) Waiting List: In July 2025, RHA opened its PBV waiting list for three-bedroom units designed for families of 5–7 members. Unlike tenant-based vouchers, PBVs are tied to the unit itself. If a family moves out, the subsidy remains with the unit for the next eligible household. RHA received over 2,000 applications, reflecting strong community demand. • Terracina at Winding Creek: The first round of leasing PBV units at Terracina at Winding Creek began in July 2025. This new 284-unit affordable community is being developed by USA Properties Fund, Inc. in west Roseville. RHA will assist with the occupancy of a total of eight PBV units over three phases, with the final phase scheduled for February 2026. • Pleasant Grove Apartments: In August 2025, RHA began assisting with occupancy of eight PBV units at Pleasant Grove Apartments, developed by Mercy Housing California in partnership with Eskaton. This 49-unit community serves households earning between 30%–60% of Area Median Income (AMI), with the PBV units reserved for families at 30% AMI. • Support for Veterans: HUD issued Notice PIH 2025-21 in July 2025, inviting housing authorities to apply for additional HUD-VASH vouchers. In September 2025, RHA applied for 20 additional vouchers and is awaiting HUD’s decision, which has been delayed due to the federal government shutdown.
• Record lease up: RHA has successfully issued all 100 HUD-VASH vouchers, achieving 99 leased veterans — the highest lease-up percentage in the agency’s history. Expanded owner participation has been critical to this success, increasing access to stable housing for veterans.

HUD requires housing authorities to maintain at least a 95% lease-up rate or utilize 95% of the annual budget authority to remain in compliance. Agencies achieving 98% or higher in either category may be designated as high performing. RHA continues to meet HUD’s high-performance standards, with 100% expenditure of its annual budget allocation in 2025. The attached table provides a monthly summary of RHA’s voucher programs for the third quarter of 2025.

Through effective management of specialized voucher programs, strong partnerships with developers, and expanded owner participation, RHA continues to deliver high-quality housing assistance and remains a high-performing housing authority. These efforts directly support the City of Roseville and the Roseville Housing Authority’s goals of expanding affordable housing and addressing homelessness in the South Placer region.

FISCAL IMPACT
This Housing Authority Quarterly Status Report does not create any additional cost to the City’s General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a

project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The Roseville Housing Authority Quarterly Report meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community

3. Enhance economic vitality
Respectfully Submitted,
Suzi Cook-Turner, Housing Supervisor
Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Vouchers
REVIEWERS:

Suzi Cook-Turner, Economic Development Department - Housing Created/Initiated - 11/19/2025 Trisha Isom, Economic Development Department - Housing Approved - 11/20/2025 Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Department Approved - 11/21/2025 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 12/2/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 12/3/2025 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 12/3/2025 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 12/3/2025 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 12/4/2025 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 12/4/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 12/4/2025

Roseville Housing Authority Voucher Lease-up CY 2025
Actual Leaseup of FYI
22-HUD FYI
(20)
Actual Leaseup of
Mainstream
12-HUD
Mainstream
(43)
Jan-25 575 570 75 75 51 100 1 20 42 43 38 38
Feb-25 575 570 75 75 57 100 1 20 39 43 38 38
Mar-25 572 570 75 75 56 100 1 20 36 43 38 38
Apr-25 573 570 75 75 55 100 3 20 38 43 38 38
May-25 580 570 75 75 57 100 3 20 37 43 37 37
Jun-25 575 570 75 75 75 100 4 20 37 43 37 37
Jul-25 564 570 75 75 65 100 6 20 37 43 36 36
Aug-25 541 570 75 75 98 100 7 20 37 43 37 37
Sep-25 540 570 75 75 99 100 8 20 37 43 37 37
YTD Total 5095 5130 675 675 613 900 34 180 340 387 336 336 YED % Leased
21-HUD
Emergency
Housing
Vouchers
(EHVs) (50)
100.0%
Actual
Lease-up
of VASH
11-HUD
VASH (100) 2025
Actual
Lease-up
of Regular
10-HUD
Regular
(570)
Actual
Lease-up
of NonElderly
Disabled
5-HUD NonElderly
Disabled
(75)
Actual
Lease-up
of EHV

99.3% 100.0% 68.1% 18.9% 87.9%

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 12/17/2025
Item #: VII.7
File #: 0709-01
Item ID: 2025-867
Title: HOUSING AUTHORITY — Administrative Plan Amendment Contact: Suzi Cook-Turner 916-774-5414 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a revised Roseville Housing Authority Administrative Plan as required by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. The Administrative Plan has no impact on the City's General Fund.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council, acting as the Roseville Housing Authority Board, adopt a resolution approving proposed amendments to the Housing Authority Administrative Plan.

BACKGROUND
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requires each housing authority to adopt a written administrative plan that establishes federal, state and local policies for administering the Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) rental assistance program. The Roseville Housing Authority (RHA) is required to revise its administrative plan, as necessary, to comply with HUD regulations and must include revisions to the Housing Authority’s discretionary policies. Revisions to the plan must be formally adopted.

On June 20, 2025, HUD issued Public and Indian Housing (PIH) Notice 2025-19 formally announcing the conclusion of Emergency Housing Voucher (EHV) funding and directing Public Housing Authorities (PHA) to begin transitioning EHV households into the Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) program. In response, the Roseville Housing Authority (RHA) conducted a comprehensive review of its policies and, as part of establishing new preferences for EHV participants, elected to update the full set of waiting list preferences to provide households with expanded opportunities to qualify for higher placements. The proposed revisions to RHA’s Administrative Plan affect Chapter Four and are summarized as follows:
• Adopt a preference for families whose HCV assistance was revoked or suspended due to HUD funding shortfalls.
• Establish tiered EHV preferences for both HCV and Mainstream waiting lists, ensuring current EHV families are prioritized.
• Maintain separate preferences for elderly/disabled households, U.S. Veterans, Roseville/Rocklin residents, and introduce a new “lease in place” preference.

Upon Board approval, the proposed amendments to the Housing Authority Administrative Plan will be submitted to HUD. The changes will go into effect January 1, 2026.

FISCAL IMPACT
The HCV Program is federally funded through the US Department of Housing and Urban Development

(HUD). Through this HUD-funded program, RHA provides an important social service locally to ensure safe and affordable housing for residents, which is an essential component of the foundation of the community’s economic stability. Through monthly rental assistance payments, the HCV Program invests over $12 million into the local rental economy annually. This Housing Authority Administrative Plan revision does not create any additional cost to the City’s General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)).

The Roseville Housing Authority’s Administrative Plan does not include the potential for a significant environmental effect, and therefore is not subject to CEQA.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community
Respectfully Submitted,
Suzi Cook-Turner, Housing Supervisor
Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 25-380

2. Chapter 4 - RHA Admin Plan - Clean

3. Chapter 4 - RHA Admin Plan - Redline
REVIEWERS:

Suzi Cook-Turner, Economic Development Department - Housing Created/Initiated - 11/19/2025 Trisha Isom, Economic Development Department - Housing Approved - 11/20/2025 Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Department Approved - 11/21/2025 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 12/4/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 12/4/2025 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 12/5/2025 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 12/5/2025 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 12/5/2025 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 12/8/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 12/8/2025

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
RESOLUTION NO. 25-380

APPROVING THE UPDATED ROSEVILLE HOUSING AUTHORITY

ADMINISTRATIVE PLAN
WHEREAS, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requires each housing authority to adopt a written administrative plan that establishes local policies for administering the Housing Choice Voucher Rental Assistance Program; and WHEREAS, staff has proposed revisions to Roseville Housing Authority’s Administrative Plan related to applications, waiting list and tenant selection; and WHEREAS, the Housing Authority has reviewed the proposed changes to the Roseville Housing Authority Administrative Plan.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Housing Authority of the City of Roseville that it hereby approves the updated Roseville Housing Authority Administrative Plan.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Housing Authority of the City of Roseville this ___ day of __________________________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES AUTHORITY MEMBERS:

NOES AUTHORITY MEMBERS:

ABSENT AUTHORITY MEMBERS:
______________________________
Chair
ATTEST:
___________________________
Secretary

Roseville Housing Authority
HCV Administrative Plan Page 4-1
Adopted May 18, 2016
Chapter 4

APPLICATIONS, WAITING LIST AND TENANT SELECTION

INTRODUCTION
When a family wishes to receive assistance under the HCV program, the family must submit an application that provides the PHA with the information needed to determine the family’s eligibility. HUD requires the PHA to place all families that apply for assistance on a waiting list.

When HCV assistance becomes available, the PHA must select families from the waiting list in accordance with HUD requirements and PHA policies as stated in the administrative plan and the annual plan.

The PHA is required to adopt clear policies and procedures for accepting applications, placing families on the waiting list, selecting families from the waiting list and must follow these policies and procedures consistently. The actual order in which families are selected from the waiting list can be affected if a family has certain characteristics designated by HUD or the PHA that justify their selection. Examples of this are the selection of families for income targeting and the selection of families that qualify for targeted funding.

HUD regulations require that all families have an equal opportunity to apply for and receive housing assistance, and that the PHA affirmatively further fair housing goals in the administration of the program [24 CFR 982.53, HCV GB p. 4-1]. Adherence to the selection policies described in this chapter ensures that the PHA will be in compliance with all relevant fair housing requirements, as described in Chapter 2.

This chapter describes HUD and PHA policies for taking applications, managing the waiting list and selecting families for HCV assistance. The policies outlined in this chapter are organized into three sections, as follows:

Part I: The Application Process. This part provides an overview of the application process and discusses how applicants can obtain and submit applications. It also specifies how the PHA will handle the applications it receives.

Part II: Managing the Waiting List. This part presents the policies that govern how the PHA’s waiting list is structured, when it is opened and closed, and how the public is notified of the opportunity to apply for assistance. It also discusses the process the PHA will use to keep the waiting list current.

Part III: Selection for HCV Assistance. This part describes the policies that guide the PHA in selecting families for HCV assistance as such assistance becomes available. It also specifies how the PHA has the information needed to make a final eligibility determination.

Roseville Housing Authority
HCV Administrative Plan Page 4-2
Adopted May 18, 2016
PART I: THE APPLICATION PROCESS
4-I.A. OVERVIEW
This part describes the PHA policies for making applications available, accepting applications, making preliminarydeterminationsof eligibility, and the placement of applicants on thewaiting list.This part also describes the PHA’s obligation to ensure the accessibility of the application process to elderly persons, peoplewith disabilities, and peoplewith limitedEnglishproficiency(LEP). 4-I.B. APPLYING FOR ASSISTANCE [HCV GB, pp. 4-11 – 4-16] Any family that wishes to receive HCV assistance must apply for admission to the program.

HUD permits the PHA to determine the format and content of HCV applications, as well as how such applications will be made available to interested families and how applications will be accepted by the PHA. The PHA must include Form HUD-92006, Supplement to Application for Federally Assisted Housing, as part of the PHA’s application.

Roseville Housing Authority (RHA) Policy
RHA initially will require families to provide only the information needed to make an initial assessment of the family’s eligibility, and to determine the family’s placement on the waiting list. The family will be required to provide all of the information necessary to establish family eligibility and level of assistance when the family is selected from the waiting list.

When the Housing Choice Voucher Waiting List is open, families must apply by means of online application. The family will be able to access the online applications from any computer or mobile device with Internet access. The application process will not be restricted to business hours. The family will have the option to print a receipt for their application.

If targeted funding is received for families receiving specific services through social service agencies, applications will be forwarded directly from those agencies with certification by the agency and family that the applicant(s) meets the specific funding criteria.
4-I.C. ACCESSIBILITY OF THE APPLICATION PROCESS
Elderly and Disabled Populations [24 CFR 8 and HCV GB, pp. 4-11 – 4-13] The PHA must take steps to ensure that the application process is accessible to those people who might have difficulty complying with the normal, standard PHA application process. The PHA must provide reasonable accommodation to the needs of individuals with disabilities. Chapter 2 provides a full discussion of the PHA’s policies related to providing reasonable accommodations for people with disabilities.

Roseville Housing Authority (RHA) Policy
If a person with disabilities is unable to access a computer to apply for the HCV Waiting List due to the nature of their disability (and is unable to have someone apply online on their behalf) they may request a reasonable accommodation for

Roseville Housing Authority
HCV Administrative Plan Page 4-3
Adopted May 18, 2016
assistance with the application process. The written request must be received by RHA during the normal business hours within the dates that online waiting list applications are being accepted. If the reasonable accommodation is not approved there will be no accommodation for applying for HCV assistance after the HCV waiting list has closed.

Limited English Proficiency
PHAs are required to take reasonable steps to ensure equal access to their programs and activities by persons with limited English proficiency [24 CFR 1]. Chapter 2 provides a full discussion on the PHA’s policies related to ensuring access to people with limited English proficiency (LEP). 4-I.D. PLACEMENT ON THE WAITING LIST
The PHA must review each complete application received and make a preliminary assessment of the family’s eligibility. The PHA must accept applications from families for whom the list is open unless there is good cause for not accepting the application (such as denial of assistance) for the grounds stated in the regulations [24 CFR 982.206(b)(2)]. Where the family is determined to be ineligible, the PHA must notify the family in writing [24 CFR 982.201(f)]. Where the family is not determined to be ineligible, the family will be placed on a waiting list of applicants.

No applicant has a right or entitlement to be listed on the waiting list, or to any particular position on the waiting list [24 CFR 982.202(c)].

Lottery to Limit Number of Pre-applications Added to the Waiting List Roseville Housing Authority (RHA) Policy
Prior to opening the waiting list RHA may elect to limit the number of preapplications to be added to the waiting list. All pre-applications received online will be entered into a computer-generated lottery that will factor in the preferences marked on the application when assigning random numbers. The predetermined number of pre-applications to be added the RHA waiting list.

Ineligible for Placement on the Waiting List
Roseville Housing Authority (RHA) Policy
If RHA can determine from the information provided that a family is ineligible, the family will not be placed on the waiting list. Where a family is determined to be ineligible, RHA will send written notification of the ineligibility determination to the applicant. The notice will specify the reasons for ineligibility and will inform the family of its right to request an informal review and explain the process for doing so (see Chapter 16).

Eligible for Placement on the Waiting List
Roseville Housing Authority (RHA) Policy
A computer-generated lottery will rank the applicants by the preferences marked on the application. RHA will contact the highest ranked applicants who indicated on their application that they qualify for the Targeted, Resident, Family, or Displaced

Roseville Housing Authority
HCV Administrative Plan Page 4-4
Adopted May 18, 2016
preferences and ask that they verify the preferences within 10 working days of the date of the letter.

Once the due date for verifying preferences has passed, all preferences that have not been verified are removed. A final lottery will be run for applicants that have verified their preferences, adding the predetermined number of applicants to the waiting list. Those who are chosen in this lottery will be placed on the waiting list according to the preference(s) for which they qualify. This lottery will be to place the applicants in number order.

Placement on the waiting list does not indicate that the family is, in fact, eligible for assistance. A final determination of eligibility will be made when the family is selected from the waiting list.

The RHA will contact applicants:
• When updating information for the waiting list;
• When their names have come to the top of the waiting list; or • If it appears that the family is ineligible for assistance.

Roseville Housing Authority
HCV Administrative Plan Page 4-5
Adopted May 18, 2016
PART II: MANAGING THE WAITING LIST
4-II.A. OVERVIEW
The PHA must have policies regarding various aspects of organizing and managing the waiting list of applicant families. This includes opening the list to new applicants, closing the list to new applicants, notifying the public of waiting list openings and closings, updating waiting list information, purging the list of families that are no longer interested in or eligible for assistance, as well as conducting outreach to ensure a sufficient number of applicants.

In addition, HUD imposes requirements on how a PHA may structure its waiting list and how families must be treated if they apply for assistance from a PHA that administers more than one assisted housing program.
4-II.B. ORGANIZATION OF THE WAITING LIST [24 CFR 982.204 and 205] The PHA’s HCV waiting list must be organized in such a manner to allow the PHA to accurately identify and select families for assistance in the proper order, according to the admissions policies described in this plan.

The waiting list must contain the following information for each applicant listed:
• Applicant name;
• Family unit size;
• Date of application;
• Qualification for any local preference;
• Racial or ethnic designation of the head of household.

HUD requires the PHA to maintain a single waiting list for the HCV program unless it serves more than one county or municipality. Such PHAs are permitted, but not required, to maintain a separate waiting list for each county or municipality served.

Roseville Housing Authority (RHA) Policy
RHA will maintain a single waiting list for the HCV program. 4-II.C. OPENING AND CLOSING THE WAITING LIST [24 CFR 982.206] The waiting list cannot be opened until the PHA publishes a notice in local newspapers of general circulation, minority media, and other suitable media outlets. The notice must comply with HUD fair housing requirements and must specify who may apply and where applications will be accepted. The notice will also state the date range that the PHA will accept applications.

Roseville Housing Authority (RHA) Policy
RHA will announce the opening of the waiting list at least 10 business days prior to the date applications will first be accepted. If the list is only being reopened for certain categories of families, this information will be contained in the notice.

RHA will give public notice by publishing the relevant information in suitable media outlets including, but not limited to:
• RHA Website • The Press-Tribune • El Hispano • Placer Herald

Roseville Housing Authority
HCV Administrative Plan Page 4-6
Adopted May 18, 2016
4-II.D. FAMILY OUTREACH [HCV GB, pp. 4-2 to 4-4]
The PHA must conduct outreach as necessary to ensure that the PHA has a sufficient number of applicants on the waiting list to use the HCV resources it has been allotted.

Because HUD requires the PHA to admit a specified percentage of extremely low-income families to the program (see Chapter 4, Part III), the PHA may need to conduct special outreach to ensure that an adequate number of such families apply for assistance [HCV GB, p. 4-20 to 4- 21].

PHA outreach efforts must comply with fair housing requirements. This includes:
• Analyzing the housing market area and the populations currently being served to identify underserved populations
• Ensuring that outreach efforts are targeted to media outlets that reach eligible populations that are underrepresented in the program
• Avoiding outreach efforts that prefer or exclude people who are members of a protected class PHA outreach efforts must be designed to inform qualified families about the availability of assistance under the program. These efforts may include, as needed, any of the following activities:
• Submitting press releases to local newspapers, including minority newspapers • Developing informational materials and flyers to distribute to other agencies • Providing application forms to other public and private agencies that serve the low-income population
• Developing partnerships with other organizations that serve similar populations, including agencies that provide services for persons with disabilities 4-II.E. REPORTING CHANGES IN FAMILY CIRCUMSTANCES
Roseville Housing Authority (RHA) Policy
While the family is on the waiting list, the family must inform RHA of changes in contact information, including current residence and mailing address. The changes must be submitted in writing within 10 business days of the change. Mail from RHA will not be forwarded by the Post Office.
4-II.F. UPDATING THE WAITING LIST [24 CFR 982.204]
HUD requires the PHA to establish policies to use when removing applicant names from the waiting list.

Purging the Waiting List
The decision to remove an applicant family that includes a person with disabilities from the waiting list is subject to reasonable accommodation. If the PHA determines that an applicant did

Roseville Housing Authority
HCV Administrative Plan Page 4-7
Adopted May 18, 2016
not respond to a PHA request for information or updates because of the family member’s disability, the PHA must reinstate the applicant family to their former position on the waiting list [24 CFR 982.204(c)(2)].

Roseville Housing Authority (RHA) Policy
Annually, RHA will determine if an update of the waiting list is needed, and if so, the portion of the waiting list it will update. The number of applicants to be updated will be determined by a projection of future lease-up needs.

To update the waiting list, RHA will send an update request via first class mail to each family on the waiting list to determine whether the family continues to be interested in, and to qualify for, the program. This update request will be sent to the last address that RHA has on record for the family.

The update request will provide a deadline by which the family must respond and will state that failure to respond will result in the applicant’s name being removed from the waiting list.

The family’s response must be through AssistanceCheck (an online secure database). If the family fails to create and/or update their AssistanceCheck account within 14 days, the family will be removed from the waiting list. A letter will be sent to the last known address for the applicant explaining that they have been deleted from the list for not responding to an update. The letter will also explain how to request an informal review regarding RHA’s decision (see Chapter 16) [24 CFR 982.201(f)].

If the letter is returned by the post office, the applicant will be removed from the waiting list without further notice.

If a family is removed from the waiting list for failure to respond, the PHA may reinstate the family if it is determined that the lack of response was due to PHA error, or to circumstances beyond the family’s control, as a result of a family member’s disability, or as a direct result of status as a victim of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, stalking, or human trafficking, including an adverse factor resulting from such abuse.

Removal from the Waiting List
Roseville Housing Authority (RHA) Policy
If at any time an applicant family is on the waiting list, RHA determines that the family is not eligible for assistance (see Chapter 3), the family will be removed from the waiting list.

If a family is removed from the waiting list because RHA has determined the family is not eligible for assistance, a notice will be sent to the family’s address of record.

The notice will state the reasons the family was removed from the waiting list and will inform the family how to request an informal review regarding RHA’s decision (see Chapter 16) [24 CFR 982.201(f)].

Roseville Housing Authority
HCV Administrative Plan Page 4-8
Adopted May 18, 2016
PART III: SELECTION FOR HCV ASSISTANCE
4-III.A. OVERVIEW
As vouchers become available, families on the waiting list must be selected for assistance in accordance with the policies described in this part.

The order in which families are selected from the waiting list depends on the selection method chosen by the PHA and is impacted in part by any selection preferences for which the family qualifies. The availability of targeted funding also may affect the order in which families are selected from the waiting list.

The PHA must maintain a clear record of all information required to verify that the family is selected from the waiting list according to the PHA’s selection policies [24 CFR 982.204(b) and 982.207(e)].
4-III.B. SELECTION AND HCV FUNDING SOURCES
Special Admissions [24 CFR 982.203]
HUD may award funding for specifically named families living in specified types of units (e.g., a family that is displaced by demolition of public housing; a non-purchasing family residing in a HOPE 1 or 2 projects). In these cases, the PHA may admit such families whether or not they are on the waiting list, and, if they are on the waiting list, without considering the family’s position on the waiting list. These families are considered non-waiting list selections. The PHA must maintain records showing that such families were admitted with special program funding.

Targeted Funding [24 CFR 982.204(e)]
HUD may award a PHA funding for a specified category of families on the waiting list. The PHA must use this funding only to assist the families within the specified category. In order to assist families within a targeted funding category, the PHA may skip families that do not qualify within the targeted funding category. Within this category of families, the order in which such families are assisted is determined according to the policies provided in Section 4-III.C.

Roseville Housing Authority (RHA) Policy
RHA administers the following types of targeted funding:

RHA administers HUD’s Rental Assistance for Non-Elderly Persons with Disabilities (NED) Program and Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing (VASH) program, Mainstream Voucher program, Emergency Housing Vouchers, and Foster Youth Initiative Vouchers.

Regular HCV Funding
Regular HCV funding may be used to assist any eligible family on the waiting list. Families are selected from the waiting list according to the policies provided in Section 4-III.C.

Roseville Housing Authority
HCV Administrative Plan Page 4-9
Adopted May 18, 2016
4-III.C. SELECTION METHOD
PHAs must describe the method for selecting applicant families from the waiting list, including the system of admission preferences that the PHA will use [24 CFR 982.202(d)].

Local Preferences [24 CFR 982.207; HCV p. 4-16]
PHAs are permitted to establish local preferences, and to give priority to serving families that meet those criteria. HUD specifically authorizes and places restrictions on certain types of local preferences. HUD also permits the PHA to establish other local preferences, at its discretion.

Any local preferences established must be consistent with the PHA plan and the consolidated plan and must be based on local housing needs and priorities that can be documented by generally accepted data sources. (See page 4-14 for preferences) Income Targeting Requirement [24 CFR 982.201(b)(2)]
HUD requires that extremely low-income (ELI) families make up at least 75% of the families admitted to the HCV program during the PHA’s fiscal year. ELI families are those with annual incomes at or below the federal poverty level or 30% of the area median income, whichever number is higher. To ensure this requirement is met, a PHA may skip non-ELI families on the waiting list in order to select an ELI family.

Low-income families admitted to the program that are “continuously assisted” under the 1937 Housing Act [24 CFR 982.4(b)], as well as low-income or moderate-income families admitted to the program that are displaced as a result of the prepayment of the mortgage or voluntary termination of an insurance contract on eligible low-income housing, are not counted for income targeting purposes [24 CFR 982.201(b)(2)(v)].

Roseville Housing Authority (RHA) Policy
RHA will monitor progress in meeting the ELI requirement throughout the fiscal year. Extremely low-income families will be selected ahead of other eligible families on an as-needed basis to ensure the income targeting requirement is met.

If there are not enough extremely low-income families on the waiting list, we will conduct outreach on a non-discriminatory basis to attract extremely low-income families to reach the statutory requirement.

Order of Selection
The PHA system of preferences may select families either according to the date and time of application, or by a random selection process [24 CFR 982.207(c)]. When selecting families from the waiting list PHAs are required to use targeted funding to assist only those families who meet the specified criteria, and PHAs are not permitted to skip down the waiting list to a family that it can afford to subsidize when there are not sufficient funds to subsidize the family at the top of the waiting list [24 CFR 982.204(d) and (e)].

Roseville Housing Authority (RHA) Policy
Families will be selected from the waiting list based on the targeted funding or selection preference(s) for which they qualify, and in accordance with RHA’s hierarchy of preferences, if applicable. Families will be selected from the waiting list

Roseville Housing Authority
HCV Administrative Plan Page 4-10
Adopted May 18, 2016
by a computer-generated lottery system in conjunction with local preference criteria and targeted funding where applicable.

Preferences
Roseville Housing Authority Policy
The Roseville Housing Authority will select families based on the following preferences. When pre-applications are received by the Roseville Housing Authority, staff will review the following ranking preference categories and will apply them in the following order.

Insufficient HCV Funding Termination = 50 points
RHA will offer a preference to families who have had their Housing Choice Voucher revoked/suspended due to HUD HAP funding shortfalls within the last 12 months.

Emergency Housing Voucher (EHV) Tiered Preference - Housing Choice Vouchers Program
To support the transition of families from the Emergency Housing Voucher (EHV) program into the Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) program, the Housing Authority has adopted a tiered local preference structure. This preference is designed to prioritize EHV families who are at risk of losing assistance due to the exhaustion of EHV program funding.

Eligible applicants must be current EHV participants and meet the criteria outlined below:

Tier 1 – High Vulnerability =
Priority is given to EHV families where the head of household, spouse, or cohead meets one or more of the following:
• Are elderly (age 62 or older)
• Has a documented disability
• Is fleeing or attempting to flee domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, stalking, or human trafficking
• Has dependent children under the age of 18
General EHV Preference =
Remaining EHV families who do not meet Tier 1 criteria but are:
• Are recently homeless and at high risk of housing instability • Are at risk of homelessness due to loss of EHV assistance • Have been continuously housed under the EHV program for at least 12 months
Emergency Housing Voucher (EHV) Preference for Mainstream Vouchers = The Housing Authority has established a local preference for families currently assisted under the Emergency Housing Voucher (EHV) program who meet the eligibility criteria for the Mainstream Voucher program and are at risk of losing assistance due to exhaustion of EHV program funding.

To qualify for this preference, the household must:

Roseville Housing Authority
HCV Administrative Plan Page 4-11
Adopted May 18, 2016
• Be actively receiving EHV assistance through Roseville Housing Authority; and
• Be at risk of losing EHV assistance due to lack of program funding; and • Meet the eligibility requirements for the Mainstream Voucher program, including:
o The head of household, spouse, or co-head must be a non-elderly person with a disability (age 18–61); and
o The household must be transitioning out of institutional or other segregated settings, at serious risk of institutionalization, homeless, or at risk of homelessness.

This preference will be applied to the Mainstream Voucher waiting list in accordance with 24 CFR 982.207(a)(2).

Elderly/Disabled Preference = 30 points
An elderly preference applies if the head, spouse, or co-head is a person who is age 62 or older. A disabled person preference is given if any family member receives Social Security or Supplemental Security benefits or otherwise meets the definition of disabled as defined under Section 223 of the Social Security Act.

Residency Preference = 15 points
Resident (live or work within the cities of Roseville/Rocklin, at time of application, or at any time during the applicant’s term on the waiting list) United States Veteran = 10 points
A veteran is defined as a person who served in the active military, naval, or air service and who was discharged or released from such service under conditions other than dishonorable.

Involuntarily Displaced Preference = 10 points
Households that are currently involuntarily displaced or become displaced (at any time during the applicant’s term on the waiting list), and are not living in standard permanent replacement housing, due to the following actions: Disaster, Government Action (such as condemnation from the Building Department), Action of Housing Owner, Inaccessibility, Property Disposition. (Re-established from a former Federal Preference Category)
• Standard permanent replacement housing is decent, safe, sanitary housing of adequate size occupied by a family under a lease or occupancy agreement. • Standard permanent replacement housing does not include transient facilities, such as motels, hotels, or temporary shelters for homeless families or victims of domestic violence.

Not subject to involuntary displacement action.

Lease-In Place Preference = 50 points
Households who intend to lease the unit in which they are currently residing, provided the unit is located within RHA’s jurisdiction and the owner agrees to participate in the Housing Choice Voucher Program. To verify eligibility for this preference, applicants must provide:

Roseville Housing Authority
HCV Administrative Plan Page 4-12
Adopted May 18, 2016
• A copy of the current lease for the unit, which must be appropriately sized for the family, and
• Utility bills for the most recent three-month period showing the applicant’s name and address to confirm residency.

Ranking of Preferences
Based on the above preferences, an applicant with a family preference (30 points) will be offered housing before an applicant with only a residency preference (15 points). The preference points accumulate, for example, an applicant, who has a family with minor children, is a Roseville resident and is involuntarily displaced would get 55 points. This applicant would get assistance before a family with minor children, is a Roseville resident, but not involuntarily displaced, as the second applicant would get 45 points.

The above points system is currently being used by the Roseville Housing Authority; however, the Housing Authority reserves the right to change the system as long as the system maintains the same type of ranking structure.
4-III.D. NOTIFICATION OF SELECTION
When a family has been selected from the waiting list, the PHA must notify the family [24 CFR 982.554(a)].

Roseville Housing Authority (RHA) Policy
RHA will notify the family by first class mail when it is selected from the waiting list. The notice will inform the family of the following:

Update application must be completed and returned.

Documents that must be provided in order to verify the preferences that were indicated on the initial waiting list application.

Due date for the required documents.

Failure to return the update application will cause the family to be removed from the waiting list.

Failure to verify preferences will result in the loss of the preference(s) and the family will be returned to the waiting list.

If the notice is returned by the post office, the applicant will be removed from the waiting list without further notice.
4-III.E. COMPLETING THE APPLICATION PROCESS
The PHA must confirm that the family is qualified for any special admission, targeted admission, or selection preference that affected the order in which the family was selected from the waiting list.

Roseville Housing Authority (RHA) Policy
Pending disclosure and documentation of social security numbers, RHA will allow the family to retain its place on the waiting list for 30 days. RHA will grant an

Roseville Housing Authority
HCV Administrative Plan Page 4-13
Adopted May 18, 2016
additional 30-day extension if needed for reasons beyond the applicant’s control such as delayed processing of the SSN application by the SSA, death in the family or other emergency. If the applicant fails to comply with SSN disclosure and documentation requirements upon expiration of the provided time period, the PHA will deny the applicant’s assistance.

If RHA determines that the family is ineligible, RHA will send written notification of the ineligibility determination. The notice will specify the reasons for ineligibility and will inform the family of its right to request an informal review (Chapter 16).

If a family fails to qualify for any criteria that affected the order in which it was selected from the waiting list (e.g. targeted funding, extremely low-income), the family will be returned to the waiting list. RHA will notify the family in writing that it has been returned to the waiting list and will specify the reasons for it.

If RHA determines that the family appears to be eligible to receive assistance, RHA will invite the family to attend a briefing in accordance with the policies in Chapter 5.

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 12/17/2025
Item #: VII.8
File #: 0709-02
Item ID: 2025-837
Title: HOUSING SUCCESSOR/CITY COUNCIL - Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Annual Report of the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund
Contact: Emily Sawin 916-774-5388 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Annual Report for the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund. The Roseville Housing Successor Agency must produce a report of housing activities annually stating the fund balance and use of the funds. The Housing Successor Agency funds used for development of local affordable housing units and homeless prevention services reduces impacts on the General Fund.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff requests that the City Council, acting as the Housing Successor, adopt a resolution approving the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Annual Report for the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund.

BACKGROUND
State of California legislation dissolved all California Redevelopment Agencies in 2012. As part of the dissolution process of the City of Roseville's Redevelopment Agency, the City elected to become the Housing Successor. State law requires the Housing Successor to maintain any funds transferred to it, together with any funds generated from housing assets in a separate Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset (Low/Mod) Fund and requires the funds to be used in accordance with applicable affordable housing-related provisions of the Community Redevelopment Law. These statutes require the Housing Successor to expend funds for specified administrative and monitoring costs related to ensuring the longterm affordability of deed-restricted affordable units.

Beginning in 2014, Housing Successors were required to produce an annual report of their housing activities, required by SB 341. The annual report, known as the Report of Required Information, is due to the Housing Successor's governing body by December 31st of each year and must include an independent financial audit of the Low/Mod Fund, for the most recent fiscal year. The audit may be separate or included in the host jurisdiction's annual audit. The Report of Required Information must be included as part of the Annual Progress Report for the Housing Element which is reported to the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development and must also be posted on the Housing Successor's website by the end of the calendar year.

The Report of Required Information, per Health and Safety Code 34171.1(f), is mandated to include the following information from the prior year:

1. The amount deposited into the Low/Mod Fund.

2. A statement of the fund balance as of the close of the last fiscal year.

3. A description of expenditures from the fund by category.

4. The statutory value of real property owned by the Housing Successor, the value of loans and

grants receivable, and the sum of these two amounts.

5. A description of any transfers made.

6. A description and status of any project for which the Housing Successor receives or holds property tax revenue pursuant to the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule.

7. For interests in real property acquired by the former Redevelopment Agency prior to February 1, 2012, a status update on compliance with Section 33334.16. For interests in real property acquired on or after February 1, 2012, a status update on the project.

8. A description of any outstanding obligations pursuant to Section 33413 that remained to transfer to the Housing Successor on February 1, 2012, of the Housing Successor’s progress in meeting those obligations, and of the Housing Successor’s plans to meet unmet obligations.

9. Reporting on income targeting requirements.

10. The percentage of units of deed-restricted rental housing restricted to seniors and assisted individually or jointly by the housing successor, its former redevelopment agency, and its host jurisdiction within the previous 10 years in relation to the aggregate number of units of deedrestricted rental housing assisted individually or jointly by the Housing Successor, its former redevelopment agency, and its host jurisdiction within the same time period.

11. The amount of any excess surplus, the amount of time that the Housing Successor has had excess surplus, and the Housing Successor’s plan for eliminating the excess surplus. The completed Report of Required Information for the City of Roseville Housing Successor Agency is included as an attachment to this staff report.

12. An inventory of homeownership units assisted by the former redevelopment agency or the Housing Successor that are subject to covenants or restrictions or to an adopted program that protects the former redevelopment agency’s investment of moneys from the Low/Mod Fund pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 33334.3.

For FY2024-25, the total deposits made into the Housing Successor fund totaled $1,032,069. A total of $214,167 was received as program income from loan payoff proceeds and $737,249 from city loan payoffs. The total expenditures from the Housing Successor fund equaled $434,196, a decrease from the preceding year of $479,500. The ending balance of the Housing Successor fund for FY2025-26 equaled $2,379,350. The fund balance has not exceeded the sum of deposits in the prior four years.

Since the audit of the Low/Mod Fund is included in the City of Roseville’s Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR), as allowed by SB 341, that information will be provided to the State of California. The City's ACFR for FY2024-25 will be presented to the City Council in early 2026 and will be available on the City’s website at www.roseville.ca.us under Departments & Divisions, Finance, Financial Transparency, or by searching for ACFR.

FISCAL IMPACT
Activities of the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund are separate and are not dependent upon the General Fund. Use of these funds for the development and programming of local affordable housing units and homeless prevention services reduces impacts on the General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a

project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 Housing Successor Annual Report meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

3. Enhance economic vitality
Respectfully Submitted,
Emily Sawin, Administrative Technician
Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 25-364

2. 24-25 Report of Required Information
REVIEWERS:

Trisha Isom, Economic Development Department - Housing Created/Initiated - 11/19/2025 Trisha Isom, Economic Development Department - Housing Approved - 11/20/2025 Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Department Approved - 11/21/2025 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 11/25/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 11/26/2025 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 12/1/2025 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 12/2/2025 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 12/3/2025 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 12/3/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 12/3/2025

RESOLUTION NO. 25-364

APPROVING THE ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING ASSET FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
WHEREAS, in 2012 the California State Legislature dissolved redevelopment agencies, and the City of Roseville Housing Successor Agency assumed the housing assets and functions of the former City of Roseville Redevelopment Agency; and

WHEREAS, SB-341 requires Housing Successors to produce an annual report of their housing activities by December 31st of each year; and
WHEREAS, staff has prepared the Report of Required Information for the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund for fiscal year 2024-25.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville approves the Report of Required Information for the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund for fiscal year 2024-25.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of __________________________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk

Report of Required Information per Health and Safety Code 34176.1 (f) City of Roseville Housing Successor
Fiscal Year 2024-25
Page | 1

1. Any amounts deposited into the Fund, with segregation of amounts deposited from payments pursuant to a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule ("ROPS") from other sources.

Amount Source Purpose
$32,274 Interest on Investments Earned Fund Balance-Reserved $7,059 Interest on Notes/Loans Fund Balance-Reserved
$41,319 Monitoring Fees Fund Balance-Reserved
$737,249 20% Deposit from City Loan Payoff Fund Balance-Reserved $214,167 Loan Payoffs-Program Income Fund Balance-Reserved $0.00 Other Income Fund Balance-Reserved
$1,032,069 Total Deposits

2. The balance in the Fund at the fiscal year end, with segregation of amounts held to meet obligations on a ROPS from other amounts.

Amount Description
$2,370,814 Ending Cash
$8,535 Interest Receivable
$2,379,350 Fund Balance 6/30/24

3. A description of expenditures from the Fund by category for:
a. Monitoring and preserving the long-term affordability of units subject to affordability restrictions or covenants entered by the redevelopment agency or the housing successor and administering permitted affordable housing activities. The amount that can be spent on monitoring and administration is capped at 2% of the value of the assets in the Fund or $200,000 whichever is greater.
b. Homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services. This amount is limited to $250,000 annually.
c. Development of housing affordable to households at or below 80% of area median income ("AMI").

Amount Description
$145,393 a. Staff charges for Monitoring
$15,953 a. Professional Services
$22,850 a. Misc Office Charges
$250,000 b. Homeless Prevention
$0.00 c. Development of housing
$434,196 Total Expenditures

Report of Required Information per Health and Safety Code 34176.1 (f) City of Roseville Housing Successor
Fiscal Year 2024-25
Page | 2

4. The statutory value of real property owned by the housing successor, the value of loans and grants receivable, and the sum of these two amounts. "Statutory value of real property" means the value of properties formerly held by the former redevelopment agency as listed on the housing asset transfer form approved by the Department of Finance ("DOF") and the purchase price of properties purchased by the housing successor.

Amount Description
$875,000 MSP Land - Note Receivable
$5,760,000 Mercy Housing - Deferred Receivables
$500,000
Hampstead Prospera at Fiddyment
Workforce – Deferred Receivables
$3,779,704 FTHB/commercial Deferred Receivables
$761,715 Residential
$11,676,419 Total Value of Land & A/R

5. A description of any inter-jurisdictional transfers of monies from the Fund in the previous fiscal year as well as any transfer from prior fiscal years if the funds are still unencumbered and a description of and status update on any project for which transferred funds have been or will be expended if that project has not yet been placed in service.

None

6. A description of any project for which the housing successor receives or holds real property tax revenue pursuant to the ROPS and the status of that project.

None

7. For interests in real property acquired by the former redevelopment agency prior to February 1, 2012, a status update on compliance with the development of the property within five (5) years after the DOF approved the property as a housing asset, which would typically be the date of approval of the housing asset transfer list. For interests in real property acquired on or after February 1, 2012, a status update on the project.

The Housing Successor provided gap financing to the projects listed below. The properties are privately owned and the Housing Successor holds no title:

Mercy Housing secured a loan from the Housing Successor for $5,760,000 for the development of a 58- unit mixed-use affordable housing development at 623 Vernon Street, Roseville. The loan was approved by the City Council, acting as the Housing Successor, on November 16, 2016. The project was completed in November 2018.

In 2016, the Housing Successor committed $600,000 of funding from the low/moderate affordable housing funds towards the Junction Crossing affordable rental housing development at 120 Pacific Street.

The deferred low interest loan was approved by the City Council, acting as the Housing Successor, on October 20, 2021. This project includes 80 affordable units available for low- and very low-income households and was completed in February 2024.

Report of Required Information per Health and Safety Code 34176.1 (f) City of Roseville Housing Successor
Fiscal Year 2024-25
Page | 3
The Housing Successor loaned $500,000 in gap funding to Hampstead Company’s Prospera at Fiddyment - Workforce Housing project for the development of a 104-unit mixed-income affordable housing development. The project is located at 2801 North Hayden Parkway in West Roseville and the loan was approved by the City Council, acting as the Housing Successor, on April 3, 2024. The project was completed in October 2024.

8. A description of any outstanding replacement housing and housing production obligations that transferred to the housing successor on February 1, 2012, the housing successor's progress in meeting those obligations, and the housing successor's plans to meet the unmet obligations.

The Agency will continue to use loan portfolio payoffs and 20% set-aside deposits from City loan payments to provide additional assistance for affordable housing developments. The value of the 20% loan receivable from the Successor Agency on June 30, 2025, is $1,497,692.20 providing the California Department of Finance approves the payment of the City loans by the Successor Agency.

9. Reporting on income targeting requirements does not need to be included until December 31, 2019 for the period from January 1, 2014 through the end of the fiscal year covered by the report (June 30, 2019 for most housing successors), and every five years thereafter. However, it may be useful for housing successors to track this information on an annual basis to ensure the requirement is met every five years. The required income targeting expenditures are that, over a five year period, the funds remaining after expenditures for monitoring and administration and rapid rehousing services, if any, must be expended for the development of housing affordable to and occupied by households earning 80% or less of the AMI, with at least 30% of the funds expended on the development of housing affordable to and occupied by households earning 30% or less of the AMI and not more than 20% of the funds expended on the development of housing affordable to and occupied by households earning between 60% and 80% of the AMI.

Current reporting period is FY 2024–25 - FY 2028–29 (due Dec 31, 2029) The Housing Successor did not expend any funds on housing activities during FY 2024–25.

10. The percentage of units of deed-restricted rental housing restricted to seniors and assisted individually or jointly by the housing successor, its former redevelopment agency, and its host jurisdiction within the previous 10 years in relation to the total number of units of deedrestricted rental housing assisted individually or jointly by the housing successor, its former redevelopment agency, and its host jurisdiction within the same time period. If the percentage of assisted senior rental housing is more than 50 percent of the total of all assisted rental housing, no additional senior rental housing can be assisted until the percentage falls to 50 percent or less.

Units Assisted from 7/1/2015 - 6/30/2025:
# of Units Description
0 Senior Restricted Rental Housing Units
891 Non-Senior Restricted Rental Housing Units
891 Total Units
0% % of Senior Restricted Rental Housing Units

Report of Required Information per Health and Safety Code 34176.1 (f) City of Roseville Housing Successor
Fiscal Year 2024-25
Page | 4

11. The amount of any excess surplus, the amount of time that the successor agency has had the excess surplus, and the housing successor's plan for eliminating the excess surplus. The definition of excess surplus has been modified so that an "excess surplus" exists to the extent a housing successor holds unencumbered funds in its Fund in an amount that exceeds the greater of $1,000,000 or the total amount of deposits into the Fund for the preceding four fiscal years. The housing successor is required to spend the excess surplus amount or transfer that amount to another jurisdiction as provided in Health and Safety Code Section 34176.1(c)(2) within three fiscal years. If not, the excess surplus amount must be transferred to HCD to use pursuant to the Multifamily Housing Program or the Joe Serna, Jr. Farmworker Housing Grant Program.

Fiscal Year Amount Deposited
FY2023-24 $450,374
FY2022-23 $500,424
FY2021-22 $1,301,704
FY2020-21 $603,561
TOTAL $2,8256,063
Fund Balance – 6/30/25 $2,379,350
Amount of Fund Balance does not exceed the
sum of the deposits in the prior four years. $0

12. Inventory of Home Ownership Units: This section provides an inventory of homeownership units assisted by the former Agency or FVHA as Housing Successor that are subject to covenants or restrictions or to an adopted program that protects the former Agency’s investment of moneys from the Low and Moderate Income Fund per Section 33334.3 (f).

Loan Date Loan Due in yrs Address Amount
12/2/2008 28 121 Hickory Street 77,300.00
2/18/2009 29 109 Hickory Street 100,000.00
6/30/2009 29 153 Hickory Street 98,637.00
11/4/2009 29 145 Hickory Street 100,000.00
11/24/2009 29 125 Hickory Street 85,778.00
11/25/2009 29 141 Hickory Street 100,000.00
11/25/2009 29 113 Hickory Street 100,000.00
3/11/2010 29 149 Hickory Street 100,000.00
4/14/2010 15 1232 Impressionist Loop $80,000
7/1/2010 15 1419 Wabash Way $28,650
TOTAL $870,365.00

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 12/17/2025
Item #: VII.9
File #: 0709-04
Item ID: 2025-921
Title: Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing - Agreement Amendments Contact: Suzanne Acrell 916-774-5469 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of the Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing agreement amendments with Advocates for Mentally Ill Housing, Latino Leadership Council, and Salvation Army. The amendments will increase the agreement grant amounts and support the City's goal to maintain a safe and healthy community. No General Fund resources will be used for these amendments.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt resolutions to approve the Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing agreement amendments to increase the FY2025-26 grant award amounts for AMI Housing, Latino Leadership Council, and Salvation Army and authorize the City Manager to execute them on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BACKGROUND
In 2017, SB 2 created the Building Homes and Jobs Trust Fund and the Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) program. The principal goal of this program is to make funding available to eligible local governments in California for housing-related projects and programs that assist in addressing the unmet housing needs of their local communities. The Cities of Roseville and Rocklin were designated as entitlement jurisdictions for PLHA funding. On June 23, 2020, the City of Rocklin adopted a resolution allowing the City of Roseville to apply for and administer their PLHA award. In July of 2020, City Council approved an application to the State of California PLHA funding for the Cities of Roseville and Rocklin. The Roseville Housing Division subsequently received awards for both applications, which supports the Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing (HPRR) program with PLHA funds for a total of 5 years, through FY2025-26.

In May 2025, City Council approved the FY2025-26 HPRR funding recommendations, and agreements were subsequently prepared and executed. A total of $63,618.94 in unspent PLHA funds, from the prior year, remains available and must be expended by June 30, 2026. Because the FY2025-26 HPRR applications were only partially funded, the remaining funds allow the City to provide additional support to the approved projects. The proposed funding amendments are as follows:
• AMI Housing: Increase by $31,618.94, for a revised total of $406,618.94. • Latino Leadership Council: Increase by $20,000.00, for a revised total of $45,000.00. • The Salvation Army: Increase by $12,000.00, for a revised total of $32,000.00.

Staff requests City Council authorization for the City Manager to execute the agreement amendments.

These amendments will ensure timely expenditure of PLHA funds, expand the capacity of local service providers to support vulnerable households, and enhance the City’s overall housing stability efforts. These

adjustments maximize the community benefit of existing resources, with no additional impact to the General Fund.

FISCAL IMPACT
The City of Roseville funded the original agreements with State Permanent Local Housing Allocation and Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund (Low/Mod funds) and is funding the amendments with State Permanent Local Housing Allocation. No General Fund resources will be used for the HPRR amendments.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378.

Approval of the Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing program agreement amendments does not include the potential for a significant environmental effect, and therefore is not subject to CEQA.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community
Respectfully Submitted,
Suzanne Acrell, Housing Analyst
Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 25-382

2. First Amendment of Grant Agreement - ASK signed

3. Resolution 25-383

4. First Amendment of Grant Agreement - Latino Leadership Council signed

5. Resolution 25-384

6. First Amendment of Grant Agreement - Salvation Army signed REVIEWERS:

Suzanne Acrell, Economic Development Department - Housing Created/Initiated - 11/24/2025 Trisha Isom, City Clerk Department Approved - 11/24/2025 Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Department Approved - 11/25/2025 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 11/26/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 12/3/2025 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 12/3/2025 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 12/3/2025 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 12/4/2025 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 12/4/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 12/4/2025

RESOLUTION NO. 25-382

APPROVING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO GRANT AGREEMENT,

BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND ADVOCATES FOR MENTALLY ILL HOUSING, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO

EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, the First Amendment to Grant Agreement for Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing Services, by and between the City of Roseville and Advocates for Mentally Ill Housing, Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said First Amendment is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2025, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk

RESOLUTION NO. 25-383

APPROVING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO GRANT AGREEMENT,

BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND LATINO LEADERSHIP COUNCIL INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, the First Amendment to Grant Agreement for Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing Services, by and between the City of Roseville and Latino Leadership Council Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said First Amendment is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2025, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk

1 B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2025\First Amendment of Grant Agreement - Latino Leadership Council.docx

FIRST AMENDMENT TO GRANT AGREEMENT FOR

HOMELESS PREVENTION AND RAPID REHOUSING SERVICES
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO GRANT AGREEMENT is made and entered into this ___ day of __________, 20__, by and between the City of Roseville acting in its role as the Housing Successor, a municipal corporation (“CITY”), and Latino Leadership Council Inc., a California non-profit corporation (“GRANTEE”).

W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, CITY and GRANTEE previously entered into a Grant Agreement dated June 11, 2025 (“Agreement”) regarding Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing Services (“Project”); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34175(b) and the California Supreme Court’s decision in California Redevelopment Association, et al. v. Ana Matosantos, et al. (53 Cal. 4th 231 (2011)), on February 1, 2012, all assets, properties, contracts, leases, books and records, buildings, and equipment of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Roseville (“RDA”) transferred to the control of the Successor Agency of the RDA (“Successor Agency”) by operation of law; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34179.7, the California Department of Finance (“DOF”) issued a finding of completion to the Successor Agency on August 30, 2013; and
Docusign Envelope ID: A2C2B8FE-74C0-4EF8-8618-B5E3CC819E63

2 B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2025\First Amendment of Grant Agreement - Latino Leadership Council.docx WHEREAS, funds in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund were subsequently transferred from the Successor Agency to CITY to use in its role as Housing Successor; and
WHEREAS, Section 34176.1(a)(2) of the California Health and Safety Code authorizes Housing Successors, after meeting certain obligations, to expend up to five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) per fiscal year for homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services; and WHEREAS, CITY desires to amend the Agreement to grant GRANTEE additional funds for the homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

1. Section 1 of the Agreement is amended by adding an additional paragraph to read as follows:
“CITY hereby authorizes an additional grant to GRANTEE in the amount of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) for homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services.

This brings the total grant amount of the Agreement to forty-five thousand dollars ($45,000).

2. All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation, has authorized the execution of this First Amendment to Agreement in duplicate by its City Manager and attested to by its City Clerk under the authority of Resolution No. _________, adopted by the Council of the City of Roseville on the ___ day of ___________, 20__, and GRANTEE has caused this First Amendment to Agreement to be executed. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
Docusign Envelope ID: A2C2B8FE-74C0-4EF8-8618-B5E3CC819E63

3 B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2025\First Amendment of Grant Agreement - Latino Leadership Council.docx CITY OF ROSEVILLE, a LATINO LEADERSHIP COUNCIL, INC.,
municipal corporation a California non-profit corporation BY: _______________________________ BY: _______________________________ DOMINICK CASEY its: _______________________________
City Manager
ATTEST: and
BY: ______________________________ BY:__________________________

CARMEN AVALOS
City Clerk its:___________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: ______________________________

MICHELLE SHEIDENBERGER
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO SUBSTANCE:

BY: ______________________________

MELISSA ANGUIANO
Economic Development Director
Sandra Reyes
Board President
Karen Jakovac
CFO
Docusign Envelope ID: A2C2B8FE-74C0-4EF8-8618-B5E3CC819E63 11/14/2025
11/14/2025

RESOLUTION NO. 25-384

APPROVING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO GRANT AGREEMENT,

BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND THE SALVATION ARMY,

AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, the First Amendment to Grant Agreement for Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing Services, by and between the City of Roseville and the Salvation Army, has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said First Amendment is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2025, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk

1 B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2025\First Amendment of Grant Agreement -Salvation Army.docx

FIRST AMENDMENT TO GRANT AGREEMENT FOR

HOMELESS PREVENTION AND RAPID REHOUSING SERVICES
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO GRANT AGREEMENT is made and entered into this ___ day of __________, 20__, by and between the City of Roseville acting in its role as the Housing Successor, a municipal corporation (“CITY”), and The Salvation Army, a California non-profit corporation (“GRANTEE”).

W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, CITY and CONSULTANT previously entered into a Professional Services Agreement dated July 22, 2025 (“Agreement”) regarding Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing Services (“Project”); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34175(b) and the California Supreme Court’s decision in California Redevelopment Association, et al. v. Ana Matosantos, et al. (53 Cal. 4th 231 (2011)), on February 1, 2012, all assets, properties, contracts, leases, books and records, buildings, and equipment of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Roseville (“RDA”) transferred to the control of the Successor Agency of the RDA (“Successor Agency”) by operation of law; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34179.7, the California Department of Finance (“DOF”) issued a finding of completion to the Successor Agency on August 30, 2013; and

2 B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2025\First Amendment of Grant Agreement -Salvation Army.docx WHEREAS, funds in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund were subsequently transferred from the Successor Agency to CITY to use in its role as Housing Successor; and
WHEREAS, Section 34176.1(a)(2) of the California Health and Safety Code authorizes Housing Successors, after meeting certain obligations, to expend up to five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) per fiscal year for homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services; and WHEREAS, CITY desires to amend the Agreement to grant GRANTEE additional funds for the homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

1. Section 1 of the Agreement is amended by adding an additional paragraph to read as follows:
“CITY hereby authorizes an additional grant to GRANTEE in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000) for homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services.

This brings the total grant amount of the Agreement to thirty-two thousand dollars ($32,000).

2. All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation, has authorized the execution of this First Amendment to Agreement in duplicate by its City Manager and attested to by its City Clerk under the authority of Resolution No. _________, adopted by the Council of the City of Roseville on the ___ day of ___________, 20__, and GRANTEE has caused this First Amendment to Agreement to be executed. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]

3 B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2025\First Amendment of Grant Agreement -Salvation Army.docx CITY OF ROSEVILLE, a THE SALVATION ARMY, a
municipal corporation California non-profit corporation BY: _______________________________ BY: _______________________________ DOMINICK CASEY its: _______________________________
City Manager
ATTEST: and
BY: ______________________________ BY:__________________________

CARMEN AVALOS
City Clerk its:___________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: ______________________________

MICHELLE SHEIDENBERGER
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO SUBSTANCE:

BY: ______________________________

MELISSA ANGUIANO
Economic Development Director
Docusign Envelope ID: 2DE19BE5-6195-4D0B-919A-F951B281F47F Captain-Divisional Secretary of Business
Captain Javier Castro
Divisional Commander, Major
Osei Stewart

3 B:\City Attorney\corres\Melissa\Contracts 2025\First Amendment of Grant Agreement -Salvation Army.docx CITY OF ROSEVILLE, a THE SALVATION ARMY, a
municipal corporation California non-profit corporation BY: _______________________________ BY: _______________________________ DOMINICK CASEY its: _______________________________
City Manager
ATTEST: and
BY: ______________________________ BY:__________________________

CARMEN AVALOS
City Clerk its:___________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: ______________________________

MICHELLE SHEIDENBERGER
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO SUBSTANCE:

BY: ______________________________

MELISSA ANGUIANO
Economic Development Director

Communication
Meeting Date: 12/17/2025
Item #: VII.10
File #: 0600-01
Item ID: 2025-880
Title: Staffing Changes
Contact: Macy Dippert 916-774-5215 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1245 (IBEW) A & B salary schedules reflecting the addition of a Power Generation Safety Technician classification. Updates to the City allocation schedule reflect the addition of three (3) regular full-time positions: a Power Generation Safety Technician, a Deputy City Attorney I/II and an Assistant Engineer.

For the remainder of FY2025-26, the financial impact of the recommendations to the Electric Fund and Water Operations Fund is $246,242. Beyond the current fiscal year, the recommended changes have an annual ongoing impact of $613,483 to the Electric, General and Water Operations Fund, including an estimated $121,000 to the General Fund.

RECOMMENDATION
As part of an ongoing assessment of the appropriate staffing structure to provide a high level of service to the community, staff recommend the following changes to the City’s staffing allocation and salary schedules to meet business needs. It is recommended that City Council take the following actions:

1. Adopt an ordinance to approve the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1245 (IBEW) A and B Salary Schedules (Appendix K) reflecting the addition of one (1) Power Generation Safety Technician classification, effective December 27, 2025; and

2. Motion to approve the attached city-wide allocation schedule effective December 27, 2025.

BACKGROUND
As part of the Municipal Code, the Human Resources Department maintains the City’s classification plan.

Human Resources staff continually evaluate organizational structure and staffing levels necessary to provide high service levels to the community. The recommended changes to the salary schedules include the addition of one (1) new classification and the allocation schedule includes the addition of three (3) fulltime regular positions.

Recommendations:

The proposed recommendations are as follows:

Addition of New Classification
Grade
Codes
Classification
Name
Monthly
Salary Range
Minimum
Monthly Salary
Range Maximum
Bargaining
Unit

1182A/1182B Power
Generation
Safety
Technician
$12,051 16,958 IBEW
Position Allocation Changes
Add
Position Position Number Department Bargaining Unit
Power Generation Safety
Technician
ELE701182001 Electric IBEW
Deputy City Attorney I/II CAO221658002 City Attorney Management Assistant Engineer EUD741005003 Environmental Utilities Local 39 Changes by Department:

City Attorney
The City Attorney’s Office is requesting that one (1) full-time regular Deputy City Attorney I/II position be added to the position allocation schedule after a recent experienced attorney was moved over to Roseville Electric. With this move, the City Attorney’s Office will need an additional Deputy City Attorney to handle the displaced work and provide needed depth in the department as well as coverage for existing workload and succession planning. Because the Electric Department will be receiving a higher level of legal services, it will reimburse the City Attorney’s Office (General Fund) for those costs in the current fiscal year and going forward, resulting in a reduced fiscal impact of this new position to the General Fund.

Electric
The Electric Department was approved to undergo a classification study to evaluate the need for a generation safety position in the power plant. The classification will develop safety/training programs, develop safety policies, monitor safety compliance, collaborate with multiple agencies including OSHA, and perform on-site training that the utility has traditionally paid consultants to perform. As a result, the classification study recommended the creation of a Power Generation Safety Technician classification to bring a higher level of “field expertise” to the safety position. The classification will be set at approximately ten percent (10%) above the Senior Power Plant Operator Technician.

Environmental Utilities
The Environmental Utilities Department is requesting that one (1) full-time regular Assistant Engineer position be added to the position allocation schedule. The Engineering and Hydrology Section has had a 35% workload increase and adding this technical role to support this section, would restore efficiency, reduce burnout, and protect critical infrastructure.

FISCAL IMPACT
The estimated total cost of the recommended position adjustments to the Electric Fund and the Water Operations Fund will be $246,242 for the remainder of FY2025-26, all of which can be absorbed by existing appropriations. The position added to the City Attorney's Office will be offset in the current fiscal year by additional reimbursement to the General Fund from Electric for its increased level of City Attorney’s Office services.

Beyond the current fiscal year, the recommended changes have an annual ongoing impact of $791,972 to the Electric, General and Water Operations Fund. The cost of the additional attorney will be partially offset by additional reimbursement from Electric. The following table provides a summary of costs for the Electric, General, and Water Operations funds.

Fund
Annual Ongoing
Cost
Impact for
remaining FY
2025-26
Electric Fund $315,544 $157,772
General Fund $121,000 $0
Water Operations Fund $176,939 $88,470
Grand Total $613,483 $246,242
City Attorney
From To Current
Salary
&
Benefits
Proposed
Salary &
Benefits
Annual
Impact *
Impact
for
remaining
FY 2025-
26 Deputy
City
Attorney
I $0 $299,489 $121,000 $0
Total $299,489 $0
*This amount includes the estimated annual pension cost of $21,592.64.

Electric
From To Current
Salary
&
Benefit
s
Propose
d Salary
&
Benefits
Annual
Impact *
Impact
for
remainin
g FY
2025-26
Power
Generatio
n Safety
Technician $0 $315,544
$315,54
4 $157,772
Total
$315,54
4 $157,772

*This amount includes the estimated annual pension cost of $22,750.18.

Environmental Utilities
From To Current
Salary &
Benefits
Proposed
Salary &
Benefits
Annual
Impact *
Impact for
remaining
FY 2025-
26 Assistant
Engineer $0 $176,939 $176,939 $88,470
Total $176,939 $88,470
*This amount includes the estimated annual pension $12,757.02.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The proposed staffing and salary changes meet the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community

6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Macy Dippert, Human Resources Manager
Stacey Peterson, Human Resources Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Ordinance 7020

2. 2025.12.27 IBEW Salary Schedule-A

3. 2025.12.27 IBEW Salary Schedule-B

4. 2025-12-27 City-wide Allocation Schedule
REVIEWERS:

Tamiko Thomas, Human Resources Department Created/Initiated - 12/5/2025 Stacey Peterson, Human Resources Department Approved - 12/8/2025 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 12/8/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 12/8/2025 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 12/8/2025 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 12/9/2025 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 12/9/2025 Dominick Casey, City Clerk Department Approved - 12/9/2025 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 12/9/2025

ORDINANCE NO. 7020

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AMENDING ORDINANCE 6932, THE SALARY ORDINANCE FOR PERSONNEL REPRESENTED BY THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 1245, AS AMENDED BY APPENDIX “K” TO BE EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 27, 2025,

AS AN URGENCY MEASURE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. Title and Purpose.

Ordinance 6932, the Salary Ordinance for employees represented by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1245, is hereby amended as shown on Appendix “K” for salary schedules A & B attached hereto, reflecting the addition of one (1) Power Generation Safety Technician classification, effective December 27, 2025.

ADDITION OF CLASSIFICATION
Classification No. Position Title Hourly Rate
1182A/1182B Power Generation Safety Technician $97.83
SECTION 2. Salary Plan Effective Date.

This Ordinance shall be effective December 27, 2025 as an urgency measure.

SECTION 3. Urgency Ordinance.

This ordinance is hereby declared to be an urgency measure, immediately necessary for the public peace, health and safety and shall take effect December 27, 2025. A statement of urgency is as follows:

It is necessary to amend the Salary Ordinance to comply with recently approved changes for the orderly and necessary continuance of operations of the City.

SECTION 4. Posting.

The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the Ordinance Book under the record of the ordinance a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of said publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ____ day of _________________, 20___, by the following vote on roll call:

2 AYES: COUNCILMEMERS
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
_____________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk

IBEW International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers

City of Roseville

Appendix:K
Effective Date:12/27/2025
Salary Schedule: International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0150A Electric Apprentice Line Technician-A Step A 62.2946 4983.57 10797.73 129572.77 Step B 67.0866 5366.93 11628.34 139540.13
Step C 71.8785 5750.28 12458.94 149507.28
Step D 76.6704 6133.63 13289.54 159474.43
Step E 81.4623 6516.98 14120.13 169441.58
Step F 86.2542 6900.34 14950.73 179408.74
1086A Electric Apprentice Metering System
Technician-A
Step A 56.1239 4489.91 9728.14 116737.71
Step B 60.4412 4835.30 10476.47 125717.70
Step C 64.7584 5180.67 11224.79 134697.47
Step D 69.0756 5526.05 11973.10 143677.25
Step E 73.3928 5871.42 12721.42 152657.02
Step F 77.7101 6216.81 13469.75 161637.01

IBEW International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers

City of Roseville

Appendix:K
Effective Date:12/27/2025
Salary Schedule: International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1084A Electric Apprentice Substation
Technician-A
Step A 50.2515 4020.12 8710.26 104523.12
Step B 54.8197 4385.58 9502.08 114024.98
Step C 59.3880 4751.04 10293.92 123527.04
Step D 63.9563 5116.50 11085.76 133029.10
Step E 68.5246 5481.97 11877.60 142531.17
Step F 73.0930 5847.44 12669.45 152033.44
Step G 77.6613 6212.90 13461.29 161535.50
Step H 82.2296 6578.37 14253.13 171037.57
2328A Electric Drafting Technician I-A Step A 41.1032 3288.26 7124.55 85494.66 Step B 43.1582 3452.66 7480.75 89769.06
Step C 45.3162 3625.30 7854.81 94257.70
Step D 47.5820 3806.56 8247.55 98970.56
Step E 49.9611 3996.89 8659.92 103919.09
Step F 52.4591 4196.73 9092.91 109114.93
Step G 55.0821 4406.57 9547.56 114570.77
Step H 57.8363 4626.90 10024.96 120299.50

IBEW International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers

City of Roseville

Appendix:K
Effective Date:12/27/2025
Salary Schedule: International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2330A Electric Drafting Technician II-A Step A 45.2135 3617.08 7837.01 94044.08 Step B 47.4743 3797.94 8228.88 98746.54
Step C 49.8480 3987.84 8640.32 103683.84
Step D 52.3402 4187.22 9072.30 108867.62
Step E 54.9573 4396.58 9525.93 114311.18
Step F 57.7053 4616.42 10002.25 120027.02
Step G 60.5906 4847.25 10502.37 126028.45
Step H 63.6200 5089.60 11027.47 132329.60
2340A Electric Engineering Technician I-A Step A 51.1336 4090.69 8863.16 106357.89 Step B 53.6902 4295.22 9306.30 111675.62
Step C 56.3750 4510.00 9771.67 117260.00
Step D 59.1937 4735.50 10260.24 123122.90
Step E 62.1533 4972.26 10773.24 129278.86
Step F 65.2610 5220.88 11311.91 135742.88
Step G 68.5240 5481.92 11877.49 142529.92
Step H 71.9501 5756.01 12471.35 149656.21

IBEW International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers

City of Roseville

Appendix:K
Effective Date:12/27/2025
Salary Schedule: International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2345A Electric Engineering Technician II-A Step A 56.2468 4499.74 9749.45 116993.34 Step B 59.0592 4724.74 10236.93 122843.14
Step C 62.0123 4960.98 10748.80 128985.58
Step D 65.1128 5209.02 11286.22 135434.62
Step E 68.3684 5469.47 11850.52 142206.27
Step F 71.7869 5742.95 12443.06 149316.75
Step G 75.3761 6030.09 13065.19 156782.29
Step H 79.1451 6331.61 13718.48 164621.81
1152A Electric Line General Foreperson-A Step A 76.7943 6143.54 13311.01 159732.14 Step B 80.6340 6450.72 13976.56 167718.72
Step C 84.6657 6773.26 14675.39 176104.66
Step D 88.8990 7111.92 15409.16 184909.92
Step E 93.3440 7467.52 16179.63 194155.52
Step F 98.0111 7840.89 16988.59 203863.09
Step G 102.9117 8232.94 17838.03 214056.34
Step H 108.0573 8644.58 18729.93 224759.18
2285A Electric Line Technician-A Step A 95.8380 7667.04 16611.92 199343.04

IBEW International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers

City of Roseville

Appendix:K
Effective Date:12/27/2025
Salary Schedule: International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2286A Electric Line Troubleshooter-A Step A 73.2185 5857.48 12691.21 152294.48 Step B 76.8795 6150.36 13325.78 159909.36
Step C 80.7234 6457.87 13992.06 167904.67
Step D 84.7596 6780.77 14691.66 176299.97
Step E 88.9976 7119.81 15426.25 185115.01
Step F 93.4474 7475.79 16197.55 194370.59
Step G 98.1198 7849.58 17007.43 204089.18
Step H 103.0258 8242.06 17857.81 214293.66
2210A Electric Materials Technician I-A Step A 39.8445 3187.56 6906.38 82876.56 Step B 41.8368 3346.94 7251.71 87020.54
Step C 43.9286 3514.29 7614.29 91371.49
Step D 46.1249 3689.99 7994.98 95939.79
Step E 48.4314 3874.51 8394.78 100737.31
Step F 50.8527 4068.22 8814.47 105773.62
Step G 53.3955 4271.64 9255.22 111062.64
Step H 56.0652 4485.22 9717.97 116615.62

IBEW International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers

City of Roseville

Appendix:K
Effective Date:12/27/2025
Salary Schedule: International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2212A Electric Materials Technician II-A Step A 43.8288 3506.30 7596.99 91163.90 Step B 46.0204 3681.63 7976.87 95722.43
Step C 48.3215 3865.72 8375.73 100508.72
Step D 50.7375 4059.00 8794.50 105534.00
Step E 53.2744 4261.95 9234.23 110810.75
Step F 55.9380 4475.04 9695.92 116351.04
Step G 58.7351 4698.81 10180.75 122169.01
Step H 61.6717 4933.74 10689.76 128277.14
1085A Electric Metering System TechnicianA Step A 86.3445 6907.56 14966.38 179596.56 1130A Electric Operations Safety
Technician-A
Step A 74.9214 5993.71 12986.38 155836.51
Step B 78.6674 6293.39 13635.68 163628.19
Step C 82.6008 6608.06 14317.47 171809.66
Step D 86.7309 6938.47 15033.36 180400.27
Step E 91.0674 7285.39 15785.02 189420.19
Step F 95.6209 7649.67 16574.29 198891.47
Step G 100.4018 8032.14 17402.98 208835.74
Step H 105.4218 8433.74 18273.11 219277.34

IBEW International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers

City of Roseville

Appendix:K
Effective Date:12/27/2025
Salary Schedule: International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2421A Electric Pre-Apprentice-A Step A 40.4915 3239.32 7018.53 84222.32 Step B 43.6061 3488.49 7558.39 90700.69
Step C 46.7209 3737.67 8098.29 97179.47
Step D 49.8358 3986.86 8638.21 103658.46
Step E 52.9505 4236.04 9178.09 110137.04
Step F 56.0652 4485.22 9717.97 116615.62
2254A Electric Preventive Data System
Technician-A
Step A 36.2224 2897.79 6278.55 75342.59
Step B 38.0334 3042.67 6592.46 79109.47
Step C 39.9350 3194.80 6922.07 83064.80
Step D 41.9318 3354.54 7268.18 87218.14
Step E 44.0284 3522.27 7631.59 91579.07
Step F 46.2298 3698.38 8013.17 96157.98
Step G 48.5414 3883.31 8413.84 100966.11
Step H 50.9684 4077.47 8834.52 106014.27
1083A Electric Substation Technician-A Step A 91.3662 7309.30 15836.81 190041.70

IBEW International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers

City of Roseville

Appendix:K
Effective Date:12/27/2025
Salary Schedule: International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2350A Electric System Dispatcher-A Step A 74.9214 5993.71 12986.38 155836.51 Step B 78.6674 6293.39 13635.68 163628.19
Step C 82.6008 6608.06 14317.47 171809.66
Step D 86.7309 6938.47 15033.36 180400.27
Step E 91.0674 7285.39 15785.02 189420.19
Step F 95.6209 7649.67 16574.29 198891.47
Step G 100.4018 8032.14 17402.98 208835.74
Step H 105.4218 8433.74 18273.11 219277.34
2359A Electric Technology System
Technician-A
Step A 57.4606 4596.85 9959.84 119518.05
Step B 60.3336 4826.69 10457.82 125493.89
Step C 63.3504 5068.03 10980.74 131768.83
Step D 66.5176 5321.41 11529.72 138356.61
Step E 69.8437 5587.50 12106.24 145274.90
Step F 73.3359 5866.87 12711.56 152538.67
Step G 77.0026 6160.21 13347.12 160165.41
Step H 80.8527 6468.22 14014.47 168173.62

IBEW International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers

City of Roseville

Appendix:K
Effective Date:12/27/2025
Salary Schedule: International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9250A Electric Utility Inspection TechnicianA Step A 61.9183 4953.46 10732.51 128790.06 Step B 65.0141 5201.13 11269.11 135229.33
Step C 68.2649 5461.19 11832.58 141990.99
Step D 71.6782 5734.26 12424.22 149090.66
Step E 75.2623 6020.98 13045.47 156545.58
Step F 79.0252 6322.02 13697.70 164372.42
Step G 82.9766 6638.13 14382.61 172591.33
Step H 87.1254 6970.03 15101.74 181220.83
2380A Electronics Technician I-A Step A 38.7017 3096.14 6708.29 80499.54 Step B 40.6369 3250.95 7043.73 84524.75
Step C 42.6687 3413.50 7395.91 88750.90
Step D 44.8021 3584.17 7765.70 93188.37
Step E 47.0422 3763.38 8153.98 97847.78
Step F 49.3943 3951.54 8561.68 102740.14
Step G 51.8640 4149.12 8989.76 107877.12
Step H 54.4573 4356.58 9439.27 113271.18

IBEW International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers

City of Roseville

Appendix:K
Effective Date:12/27/2025
Salary Schedule: International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2385A Electronics Technician II-A Step A 42.5719 3405.75 7379.13 88549.55 Step B 44.7005 3576.04 7748.09 92977.04
Step C 46.9356 3754.85 8135.50 97626.05
Step D 49.2823 3942.58 8542.27 102507.18
Step E 51.7464 4139.71 8969.38 107632.51
Step F 54.3337 4346.70 9417.84 113014.10
Step G 57.0504 4564.03 9888.74 118664.83
Step H 59.9030 4792.24 10383.19 124598.24
1120A Electronics Technician III-A Step A 46.8291 3746.33 8117.04 97404.53 Step B 49.1706 3933.65 8522.90 102274.85
Step C 51.6291 4130.33 8949.04 107388.53
Step D 54.2106 4336.85 9396.50 112758.05
Step E 56.9211 4553.69 9866.32 118395.89
Step F 59.7672 4781.38 10359.65 124315.78
Step G 62.7555 5020.44 10877.62 130531.44
Step H 65.8933 5271.46 11421.51 137058.06

IBEW International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers

City of Roseville

Appendix:K
Effective Date:12/27/2025
Salary Schedule: International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1037A Environmental Utilities Instrument
and Control Technician I - A
Step A 38.7017 3096.14 6708.29 80499.54
Step B 40.6369 3250.95 7043.73 84524.75
Step C 42.6687 3413.50 7395.91 88750.90
Step D 44.8021 3584.17 7765.70 93188.37
Step E 47.0422 3763.38 8153.98 97847.78
Step F 49.3943 3951.54 8561.68 102740.14
Step G 51.8640 4149.12 8989.76 107877.12
Step H 54.4573 4356.58 9439.27 113271.18
1038A Environmental Utilities Instrument
and Control Technician II - A
Step A 42.5719 3405.75 7379.13 88549.55
Step B 44.7005 3576.04 7748.09 92977.04
Step C 46.9356 3754.85 8135.50 97626.05
Step D 49.2823 3942.58 8542.27 102507.18
Step E 51.7464 4139.71 8969.38 107632.51
Step F 54.3337 4346.70 9417.84 113014.10
Step G 57.0504 4564.03 9888.74 118664.83
Step H 59.9030 4792.24 10383.19 124598.24

IBEW International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers

City of Roseville

Appendix:K
Effective Date:12/27/2025
Salary Schedule: International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1082A Generation Maintenance SchedulerCoordinator-A Step A 66.3668 5309.34 11503.58 138042.94 Step B 69.6852 5574.82 12078.77 144945.22
Step C 73.1695 5853.56 12682.71 152192.56
Step D 76.8278 6146.22 13316.82 159801.82
Step E 80.6694 6453.55 13982.70 167792.35
Step F 84.7028 6776.22 14681.82 176181.82
Step G 88.9379 7115.03 15415.90 184990.83
Step H 93.3849 7470.79 16186.72 194240.59
3608A Instrument and Control Technician-A Step A 60.3334 4826.67 10457.79 125493.47 Step B 63.3501 5068.01 10980.68 131768.21
Step C 66.5177 5321.42 11529.73 138356.82
Step D 69.8437 5587.50 12106.24 145274.90
Step E 73.3358 5866.86 12711.54 152538.46
Step F 77.0026 6160.21 13347.12 160165.41
Step G 80.8527 6468.22 14014.47 168173.62
Step H 84.8953 6791.62 14715.19 176582.22

IBEW International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers

City of Roseville

Appendix:K
Effective Date:12/27/2025
Salary Schedule: International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 4520A Materials Technician-A Step A 39.3816 3150.53 6826.14 81913.73 Step B 41.3504 3308.03 7167.40 86008.83
Step C 43.4182 3473.46 7525.82 90309.86
Step D 45.5892 3647.14 7902.13 94825.54
Step E 47.8684 3829.47 8297.19 99566.27
Step F 50.2619 4020.95 8712.06 104544.75
Step G 52.7750 4222.00 9147.67 109772.00
Step H 55.4137 4433.10 9605.04 115260.50
5316A Plant and Equipment Maintenance
Worker I-A
Step A 26.8981 2151.85 4662.34 55948.05
Step B 28.2431 2259.45 4895.47 58745.65
Step C 29.6551 2372.41 5140.22 61682.61
Step D 31.1381 2491.05 5397.27 64767.25
Step E 32.6947 2615.58 5667.08 68004.98
Step F 34.3295 2746.36 5950.45 71405.36
Step G 36.0459 2883.67 6247.96 74975.47
Step H 37.8483 3027.86 6560.37 78724.46

IBEW International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers

City of Roseville

Appendix:K
Effective Date:12/27/2025
Salary Schedule: International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5319A Plant and Equipment Maintenance
Worker II-A
Step A 29.5877 2367.02 5128.53 61542.42
Step B 31.0673 2485.38 5385.00 64619.98
Step C 32.6206 2609.65 5654.24 67850.85
Step D 34.2517 2740.14 5936.96 71243.54
Step E 35.9642 2877.14 6233.79 74805.54
Step F 37.7624 3020.99 6545.48 78545.79
Step G 39.6505 3172.04 6872.75 82473.04
Step H 41.6331 3330.65 7216.40 86596.85
5327A Plant and Equipment Mechanic I-A Step A 32.5469 2603.75 5641.46 67697.55 Step B 34.1741 2733.93 5923.51 71082.13
Step C 35.8827 2870.62 6219.67 74636.02
Step D 37.6768 3014.14 6530.65 78367.74
Step E 39.5607 3164.86 6857.19 82286.26
Step F 41.5386 3323.09 7200.02 86400.29
Step G 43.6156 3489.25 7560.04 90720.45
Step H 45.7964 3663.71 7938.04 95256.51

IBEW International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers

City of Roseville

Appendix:K
Effective Date:12/27/2025
Salary Schedule: International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5328A Plant and Equipment Mechanic II-A Step A 35.8013 2864.10 6205.56 74466.70 Step B 37.5913 3007.30 6515.83 78189.90
Step C 39.4709 3157.67 6841.62 82099.47
Step D 41.4446 3315.57 7183.73 86204.77
Step E 43.5167 3481.34 7542.89 90514.74
Step F 45.6926 3655.41 7920.05 95040.61
Step G 47.9772 3838.18 8316.05 99792.58
Step H 50.3761 4030.09 8731.86 104782.29
5595A Power Engineer I-A Step A 55.5317 4442.54 9625.49 115505.94 Step B 58.3081 4664.65 10106.74 121280.85
Step C 61.2236 4897.89 10612.09 127345.09
Step D 64.2847 5142.78 11142.68 133712.18
Step E 67.4991 5399.93 11699.84 140398.13
Step F 70.8741 5669.93 12284.84 147418.13
Step G 74.4178 5953.42 12899.09 154789.02
Step H 78.1388 6251.10 13544.06 162528.70

IBEW International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers

City of Roseville

Appendix:K
Effective Date:12/27/2025
Salary Schedule: International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5596A Power Engineer II-A Step A 61.0850 4886.80 10588.07 127056.80 Step B 64.1393 5131.14 11117.48 133409.74
Step C 67.3463 5387.70 11673.36 140080.30
Step D 70.7136 5657.09 12257.02 147084.29
Step E 74.2493 5939.94 12869.88 154438.54
Step F 77.9618 6236.94 13513.38 162160.54
Step G 81.8598 6548.78 14189.03 170268.38
Step H 85.9527 6876.22 14898.47 178781.62
1182A Power Generation Safety TechnicianA Step A 69.5272 5562.18 12051.38 144616.58 Step B 73.0035 5840.28 12653.94 151847.28
Step C 76.6537 6132.30 13286.64 159439.70
Step D 80.4864 6438.91 13950.98 167411.71
Step E 84.5107 6760.86 14648.52 175782.26
Step F 88.7363 7098.90 15380.96 184571.50
Step G 93.1731 7453.85 16150.00 193800.05
Step H 97.8317 7826.54 16957.49 203489.94

IBEW International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers

City of Roseville

Appendix:K
Effective Date:12/27/2025
Salary Schedule: International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5590A Power Plant Engineer I-A Step A 55.5317 4442.54 9625.49 115505.94 Step B 58.3081 4664.65 10106.74 121280.85
Step C 61.2236 4897.89 10612.09 127345.09
Step D 64.2847 5142.78 11142.68 133712.18
Step E 67.4991 5399.93 11699.84 140398.13
Step F 70.8741 5669.93 12284.84 147418.13
Step G 74.4178 5953.42 12899.09 154789.02
Step H 78.1388 6251.10 13544.06 162528.70
5591A Power Plant Engineer II-A Step A 61.0850 4886.80 10588.07 127056.80 Step B 64.1393 5131.14 11117.48 133409.74
Step C 67.3462 5387.70 11673.34 140080.10
Step D 70.7134 5657.07 12256.99 147083.87
Step E 74.2491 5939.93 12869.84 154438.13
Step F 77.9617 6236.94 13513.36 162160.34
Step G 81.8597 6548.78 14189.01 170268.18
Step H 85.9527 6876.22 14898.47 178781.62

IBEW International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers

City of Roseville

Appendix:K
Effective Date:12/27/2025
Salary Schedule: International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5526A Power Plant Mechanic-A Step A 54.8486 4387.89 9507.09 114085.09 Step B 57.5911 4607.29 9982.46 119789.49
Step C 60.4707 4837.66 10481.59 125779.06
Step D 63.4942 5079.54 11005.66 132067.94
Step E 66.6688 5333.50 11555.93 138671.10
Step F 70.0021 5600.17 12133.70 145604.37
Step G 73.5024 5880.19 12740.42 152884.99
Step H 77.1776 6174.21 13377.45 160529.41
5522A Power Plant Operator Technician I-A Step A 52.2367 4178.94 9054.36 108652.34 Step B 54.8487 4387.90 9507.11 114085.30
Step C 57.5910 4607.28 9982.44 119789.28
Step D 60.4707 4837.66 10481.59 125779.06
Step E 63.4940 5079.52 11005.63 132067.52
Step F 66.6689 5333.51 11555.94 138671.31
Step G 70.0023 5600.18 12133.73 145604.78
Step H 73.5024 5880.19 12740.42 152884.99

IBEW International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers

City of Roseville

Appendix:K
Effective Date:12/27/2025
Salary Schedule: International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5523A Power Plant Operator Technician II-A Step A 57.4606 4596.85 9959.84 119518.05 Step B 60.3336 4826.69 10457.82 125493.89
Step C 63.3504 5068.03 10980.74 131768.83
Step D 66.5176 5321.41 11529.72 138356.61
Step E 69.8437 5587.50 12106.24 145274.90
Step F 73.3359 5866.87 12711.56 152538.67
Step G 77.0027 6160.22 13347.13 160165.62
Step H 80.8527 6468.22 14014.47 168173.62
5401A Predictive Maintenance Technician IA Step A 38.7018 3096.14 6708.31 80499.74 Step B 40.6369 3250.95 7043.73 84524.75
Step C 42.6687 3413.50 7395.91 88750.90
Step D 44.8021 3584.17 7765.70 93188.37
Step E 47.0422 3763.38 8153.98 97847.78
Step F 49.3944 3951.55 8561.70 102740.35
Step G 51.8640 4149.12 8989.76 107877.12
Step H 54.4573 4356.58 9439.27 113271.18

IBEW International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers

City of Roseville

Appendix:K
Effective Date:12/27/2025
Salary Schedule: International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5402A Predictive Maintenance Technician IIA Step A 42.5719 3405.75 7379.13 88549.55 Step B 44.7005 3576.04 7748.09 92977.04
Step C 46.9355 3754.84 8135.49 97625.84
Step D 49.2824 3942.59 8542.28 102507.39
Step E 51.7464 4139.71 8969.38 107632.51
Step F 54.3338 4346.70 9417.86 113014.30
Step G 57.0504 4564.03 9888.74 118664.83
Step H 59.9030 4792.24 10383.19 124598.24
5533A Preventative Maintenance
Coordinator-A
Step A 43.3195 3465.56 7508.71 90104.56
Step B 45.4857 3638.86 7884.19 94610.26
Step C 47.7599 3820.79 8278.38 99340.59
Step D 50.1479 4011.83 8692.30 104307.63
Step E 52.6553 4212.42 9126.92 109523.02
Step F 55.2880 4423.04 9583.25 114999.04
Step G 58.0524 4644.19 10062.42 120748.99
Step H 60.9551 4876.41 10565.55 126786.61

IBEW International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers

City of Roseville

Appendix:K
Effective Date:12/27/2025
Salary Schedule: International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5500A Preventative Maintenance Technician
I-A
Step A 35.1834 2814.67 6098.46 73181.47
Step B 36.9425 2955.40 6403.37 76840.40
Step C 38.7897 3103.18 6723.55 80682.58
Step D 40.7292 3258.34 7059.73 84716.74
Step E 42.7656 3421.25 7412.70 88952.45
Step F 44.9039 3592.31 7783.34 93400.11
Step G 47.1491 3771.93 8172.51 98070.13
Step H 49.5066 3960.53 8581.14 102973.73
5502A Preventative Maintenance Technician
II-A
Step A 38.7018 3096.14 6708.31 80499.74
Step B 40.6369 3250.95 7043.73 84524.75
Step C 42.6687 3413.50 7395.91 88750.90
Step D 44.8021 3584.17 7765.70 93188.37
Step E 47.0422 3763.38 8153.98 97847.78
Step F 49.3943 3951.54 8561.68 102740.14
Step G 51.8641 4149.13 8989.78 107877.33
Step H 54.4573 4356.58 9439.27 113271.18

IBEW International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers

City of Roseville

Appendix:K
Effective Date:12/27/2025
Salary Schedule: International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 7020A SCADA System Technician-A Step A 42.5719 3405.75 7379.13 88549.55 Step B 44.7005 3576.04 7748.09 92977.04
Step C 46.9356 3754.85 8135.50 97626.05
Step D 49.2823 3942.58 8542.27 102507.18
Step E 51.7464 4139.71 8969.38 107632.51
Step F 54.3337 4346.70 9417.84 113014.10
Step G 57.0504 4564.03 9888.74 118664.83
Step H 59.9030 4792.24 10383.19 124598.24
7118A Senior Electric Line Technician-A Step A 74.9214 5993.71 12986.38 155836.51 Step B 78.6674 6293.39 13635.68 163628.19
Step C 82.6008 6608.06 14317.47 171809.66
Step D 86.7309 6938.47 15033.36 180400.27
Step E 91.0674 7285.39 15785.02 189420.19
Step F 95.6209 7649.67 16574.29 198891.47
Step G 100.4018 8032.14 17402.98 208835.74
Step H 105.4218 8433.74 18273.11 219277.34

IBEW International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers

City of Roseville

Appendix:K
Effective Date:12/27/2025
Salary Schedule: International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1153A Senior Electric Line Troubleshooter-A Step A 76.8794 6150.35 13325.76 159909.15 Step B 80.7234 6457.87 13992.06 167904.67
Step C 84.7596 6780.77 14691.66 176299.97
Step D 88.9975 7119.80 15426.23 185114.80
Step E 93.4475 7475.80 16197.57 194370.80
Step F 98.1198 7849.58 17007.43 204089.18
Step G 103.0257 8242.06 17857.79 214293.46
Step H 108.1771 8654.17 18750.70 225008.37
7169A Senior Electric Materials TechnicianA Step A 48.2120 3856.96 8356.75 100280.96 Step B 50.6225 4049.80 8774.57 105294.80
Step C 53.1536 4252.29 9213.29 110559.49
Step D 55.8113 4464.90 9673.96 116087.50
Step E 58.6020 4688.16 10157.68 121892.16
Step F 61.5318 4922.54 10665.51 127986.14
Step G 64.6085 5168.68 11198.81 134385.68
Step H 67.8389 5427.11 11758.74 141104.91

IBEW International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers

City of Roseville

Appendix:K
Effective Date:12/27/2025
Salary Schedule: International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1036A Senior Electric Metering Systems
Technician - A
Step A 67.4998 5399.98 11699.97 140399.58
Step B 70.8749 5669.99 12284.98 147419.79
Step C 74.4186 5953.49 12899.22 154790.69
Step D 78.1395 6251.16 13544.18 162530.16
Step E 82.0465 6563.72 14221.39 170656.72
Step F 86.1489 6891.91 14932.48 179189.71
Step G 90.4562 7236.50 15679.07 188148.90
Step H 94.9790 7598.32 16463.03 197556.32
7126A Senior Electric Substation
Technician-A
Step A 71.4254 5714.03 12380.40 148564.83
Step B 74.9969 5999.75 12999.46 155993.55
Step C 78.7464 6299.71 13649.38 163792.51
Step D 82.6839 6614.71 14331.88 171982.51
Step E 86.8182 6945.46 15048.49 180581.86
Step F 91.1590 7292.72 15800.89 189610.72
Step G 95.7171 7657.37 16590.96 199091.57
Step H 100.5028 8040.22 17420.49 209045.82

IBEW International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers

City of Roseville

Appendix:K
Effective Date:12/27/2025
Salary Schedule: International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 7168A Senior Electric System Dispatcher-A Step A 82.4135 6593.08 14285.01 171420.08 Step B 86.5342 6922.74 14999.26 179991.14
Step C 90.8608 7268.86 15749.21 188990.46
Step D 95.4039 7632.31 16536.68 198440.11
Step E 100.1740 8013.92 17363.49 208361.92
Step F 105.1827 8414.62 18231.67 218780.02
Step G 110.4419 8835.35 19143.26 229719.15
Step H 115.9639 9277.11 20100.41 241204.91
7170A Senior Electronic Technician-A Step A 51.5120 4120.96 8928.75 107144.96 Step B 54.0877 4327.02 9375.20 112502.42
Step C 56.7921 4543.37 9843.96 118127.57
Step D 59.6316 4770.53 10336.14 124033.73
Step E 62.6132 5009.06 10852.95 130235.46
Step F 65.7438 5259.50 11395.59 136747.10
Step G 69.0311 5522.49 11965.39 143584.69
Step H 72.4826 5798.61 12563.65 150763.81