Roseville City Council
March 4, 2026

Roseville Electric Building,
116 S. Grant Street, 1st Floor
roseville.ca.us
The City of Roseville welcomes your participation.

Meeting Schedule: Regular meetings of the City Council are held on the first and third Wednesday of each month at 6:00 p.m.

Two Public Comment Periods for Non-Agenda Items: A total of twenty-five (25) minutes is allotted for public comments. At the beginning and end of the meeting, each speaker has three (3) minutes to address the Mayor/Chair on issues that are not listed on the agenda and are within the City’s jurisdiction. Please submit a yellow speaker card to the City Clerk before the item is heard if you wish to make a comment. You will still have an opportunity to comment if you haven’t filled out a yellow speaker card.

Brown Act: The City Council cannot discuss or act on items not listed on the agenda. Public Comment on Agenda Items: Each speaker has five (5) minutes to address items that are listed on the agenda.

Levine Act Provisions: If you’ve made a campaign contribution totaling more than $500 ($250 prior to January 1, 2025) to City Council Members in the last twelve (12) months, you must disclose it before addressing an item on the agenda. Please visit Levine Act – City of Roseville for updated forms and information.

Audio/Visual Presentations: If making a presentation regarding an agenda item, audio/visual materials must be submitted to the City Clerk for consideration at least 72 hours in advance.

Americans with Disabilities Act: If special assistance is required to participate in a meeting, including the need of auxiliary aids or services, please notify the City Clerk at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. City Clerk 311 Vernon Street [email protected] 916-774-5263 TDD: 916-774-5220 Security Measures: All meeting attendees must successfully pass through a security metal detector. Any person with a prohibited item will not be allowed entry. Prohibited items include but are not limited to firearms (even with valid CCW), knives, pepper spray/mace, explosives of any kind/any weapons and/or dangerous devices of any kind, illegal drugs, and alcohol.

Viewing Options: The City of Roseville provides three options for viewing meetings:

Krista Bernasconi, Mayor
Karen Alvord, Vice Mayor
Bruce Houdesheldt, Councilmember
Tracy Mendonsa, Councilmember
Pauline Roccucci, Councilmember
Dominick Casey, City Manager
Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
AGENDA
City Council Regular Meeting
March 4, 2026
6:00 PM
Roseville Electric Building,
116 S. Grant Street, 1st Floor
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
IV. MEETING PROCEDURES
V. PRESENTATIONS

1. Proclamation - California Arbor Week
Summary: Proclaim March 7-14, 2026 as California Arbor Week and urge all residents to observe and celebrate the week by planting trees for our benefit and for the benefit of future generations.

CONTACT: Arleta Wagenhals 916-774-5200 [email protected] VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the first opportunity to make a public comment on non-agenda items.

VII. CONSENT CALENDAR

2. Resolution Declaring Public Weeds and Rubbish a Public Nuisance - Setting a Public Hearing Date (FIRE DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a resolution declaring weeds, rubbish, dirt, and/or rank growth within the City to be a public nuisance, as well as ordering the Fire Chief to give notice of the passage and setting a time and place for the required public hearing. The public hearing will be scheduled for the City Council meeting on Wednesday, April 15, 2026. Owners of private parcels that are abated by the City are responsible for the costs associated with providing abatement services. This item has no fiscal impact on the General Fund.

CONTACT: Jordan Paul 916-774-5802 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-045 declaring all weeds, dirt, rubbish, and/or rank growths within the City of Roseville to be a nuisance; ordering the Fire Chief to give notice of the passage of this resolution; and setting a time and place for hearing any objections to the proposed destruction or removal of such weeds, dirt, rubbish, or rank growths.

3. Aquifer Storage Recovery Well and Pump Station Design Project - Professional Design Services Agreement Amendment and Budget Adjustment (ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT - WATER)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a third amendment to the professional design services agreement with Carollo Engineers, Inc. for the Aquifer Storage Recovery Well and Pump Station Design Project in the amount of $1,028,656. The third amendment will increase the total not-to exceed contract amount from $6,369,033 to $7,397,689. This item also requests approval of a budget adjustment of $1,028,656 from the Water Construction Fund to fund the amendment.

CONTACT: Janice Gainey 916-774-5535 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-041 approving a third amendment to professional design services agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Carollo Engineers, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville. b. Adopt Ordinance No. 7048 authorizing certain amendments to the fiscal year 2025-26 budget and declaring this ordinance to be immediately effective as an appropriation measure.

4. Roseville Municipal Code Ordinance - Military Equipment Policy (POLICE DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends adoption of findings pursuant to California Government Code Section 7071 and 7072, and introduce for first reading an ordinance renewing Ordinance 6463 and readopting and continuing Roseville Police Department Policy No. 706, titled “Military Equipment”, thereby authorizing the Roseville Police Department’s continued use of “military equipment”, as defined by Government Code Section 7070.

CONTACT: Scott Blynn 916-774-5079 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt the findings and introduce for first reading an ordinance renewing Ordinance 6463 and readopting and continuing Roseville Police Department Policy No. 706, titled “Military Equipment”, thereby authorizing the Roseville Police Department’s continued use of “military equipment”, as defined by Government Code Section 7070.

5. Infill PCL 13 1028 Main Street Subdivision Project — Notice of Completion (DEVELOPMENT

SERVICES DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING DIVISION)

Summary: Staff recommends approval of the Notice of Completion for the Infill PCL 13 1028 Main Street Subdivision Project as complete. The Engineering Division has made a final inspection of the project and has found the roadway infrastructure work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications. This action has no impact to the City's General Fund. Construction costs were paid by the developer.

CONTACT: Jeremy Knuthson 916-774-5252 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-042 accepting the public work known as Infill PCL 13 1028 Main Street Subdivision Project, approving the "Notice of Completion", and authorizing and directing the City Engineer to execute said notice on behalf of the City of Roseville, therefore, and accepting all dedications offered on the recorded map of the subdivision.

6. Parking Lot at the Maidu Soccer Fields — Notice of Completion (PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT -

ENGINEERING - CITY PROJECT'S)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the Notice of Completion for the Parking Lot at the Maidu Soccer Fields. The project included the construction of 84 parking spaces, including accessible spaces, and installation of two drainage facilities to support the improvements. The total cost of the construction contract with BRCO Constructors, Inc. was $633,900. The project was funded by General Fund resources.

CONTACT: Nick Bumb 916-746-1313 [email protected]
The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-044 accepting the public work known as Parking Lot at the Maidu Soccer Fields, approving the “Notice of Completion”, and authorizing the Public Works Director to execute said notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

7. Federal Emergency Management Agency Fiscal Year 2025 Hazard Mitigation Grant Program – Application (PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT – ENGINEERING – FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT) Summary: Staff recommends authorization to submit a grant application to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) through the California Office of Emergency Services (CalOES) for the Fiscal Year 2025 Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute all related forms and agreements on behalf of the City.

If awarded, funds would be applied to the Pleasant Grove Stormwater Retention Basin Project.

The project is funded by the Pleasant Grove/Curry Creek Watershed Drainage Mitigation Fee Fund. No General Fund resources are included for this project.

CONTACT: Brian Walker 916-746-1349 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-046 approving a grant application to the California Office of Emergency Services for the Federal Emergency Management Agency fiscal year 2025 Hazard

Mitigation Grant Program, and authorizing the Assistant City Manager or Public Works Director to execute all related forms and agreements on behalf of the City of Roseville.

8. Fiscal Year 2024-25 Transporation Development Act Claim Revision (PUBLIC WORKS

DEPARTMENT - TRANSPORTATION)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the revised Fiscal Year 2024-25 Transportation Development Act claim in the amount of $12,563,878 for the City’s transit and transportation funding, and authorization for the City Manager or his designee to execute the claim on behalf of the City. Included in this approval is a payment of $59,547 to Placer County Transportation Planning Agency for Roseville’s share of the Funding Strategy Outreach program.

CONTACT: Kimberly Goulet 916-746-1320 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-053 approving and authorizing execution of the 2024/25 Transportation Development Act claims revision to the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency; and
b. Approve payment of FY2024-25 Local Transportation Fund funds to Placer County Transportation Planning Agency in the amount of $59,547 for the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency Funding Strategy Outreach program.

9. Reservation of Affordable Housing Funds for Development of the Pleasant Grove Apartments Phase II (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - HOUSING)
Summary: Staff recommends approval to reserve $3,000,000 in affordable housing funds for an affordable housing project to be developed in Roseville. The request is to reserve $1,500,000 from the City Local Housing Trust Fund and $1,500,000 from the State Local Housing Trust Fund for construction of Mercy Housing's affordable housing project, Pleasant Grove Apartments Phase II. The City's Local Housing Trust Fund receives funding from developer in-lieu fees and payoffs from developer subsidized affordable purchase loans. The Housing Division has funding available in the Local Housing Trust Fund (LHTF), which will be used to match available stateawarded LHTFs. No General Fund resources will be used.

CONTACT: Kristine Faelz 916-774-5451 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-052 approving the reservation of $3,000,000 in affordable housing funds for the development of the Pleasant Grove Apartments Phase II.

10. Western Systems Power Pool Agreement Collateral Annex and Cover Sheet (ELECTRIC

DEPARTMENT - FINANCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the Western Systems Power Pool (WSPP) Collateral Annex, including the Cover Sheet Elections, with NRG Business Marketing LLC (NRG) and Triolith Energy Fund, LP (Triolith). The documents supplement the WSPP Agreement previously

executed by the City and establish industry-standard credit and collateral provisions that would apply to any future wholesale physical power transactions with NRG and Triolith under the WSPP framework. There is no cost associated with the execution of these documents.

CONTACT: Patrick Zanardelli 916-774-5673 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-049 approving the Western Systems Power Pool Collateral Annex and Cover Sheet Elections, by and between the City of Roseville and NRG Business Marketing LLC, and authorizing the City Manager to execute them on behalf of the City of Roseville. b. Adopt Resolution No. 26-050 approving the Western Systems Power Pool Collateral Annex and Cover Sheet Elections, by and between the City of Roseville and Triolith Energy Fund, LP, and authorizing the City Manager to execute them on behalf of the City of Roseville.

11. Substation Transformer Civil Construction - Approval of Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Call for Bids (ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING) Summary: Staff recommends approval of plans and specifications of the Substation Transformer Civil Construction project and authorization for staff to call for bids. Construction work will occur at two locations: a new concrete foundation at Fiddyment Substation is required to site a spare 46MVA substation transformer, and construction work at Sierra Vista Substation is required to meet oil containment requirements. The cost of the project is estimated at $300,000. Funds are available in the Electric Department's FY2025-26 budget in the Electric Fund.

CONTACT: David Angel Jimenez 916-774-5698 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Approve the plans and specifications for the SubstationTransformer Civil Construction project and authorize staff to call for bids.

12. Renewable Energy Transaction Confirmation and Credit Support Addendum - Amendments (ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT - RESOURCE PLANNING & GENERATION)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of an amendment to the existing renewable agreement with Shell Energy North America, L.P. and to execute an updated Credit Support Annex. The contract amendment will increase the contract term by one year for a new term totaling 11.5 years, and increase the cost of the contract by $6,951,000, up to a total of $84,125,000 over the amended term of the contract. The updated Credit Support Annex with Shell Energy North America, L.P. will increase credit limits for both parties from $25,000,000 to $35,000,000, for high investment grade ratings, to reflect the higher total control authority. Funding for the cost of the amendment will be included in the Electric Department's proposed FY2026-27 budget and contingent on the City Council's approval.

CONTACT: Petra Wallace 916-774-5510 [email protected]

The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-047 approving a first amendment to transaction confirmation, by and between the City of Roseville and Carollo Engineers, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
b. Adopt Resolution No. 26-048 approving a second amendment to WSPP Agreement Credit Support Addendum, by and between the City of Roseville and Carollo Engineers, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

13. Main Gas Supplier - Agreement Confirmation (ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT - RESOURCE PLANNING & GENERATION)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a three-year main gas supplier agreement with ConocoPhillips Company to provide natural gas balancing services to the City. The agreement supports the Electric Department's operation of its natural gas generating facilities by scheduling the daily natural gas deliveries for planned electricity production. The annual cost of the agreement is estimated to be approximately $30,000. Funding is included in the Electric Department's FY2025-26 budget in the Electric Fund.

CONTACT: Petra Wallace 916-774-5510 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-043 approving a main gas supplier agreement confirmation, by and between the City of Roseville and Conocophillips Company, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

14. JM-51 Park Project - Approve Plans and Specifications and Authorize Staff to Call for Bids (PARKS, RECREATION, AND LIBRARIES DEPARTMENT - PARK DEVELOPMENT) Summary: Staff recommends City Council approval of the plans and specifications for the JM-51 Park Project and authorize staff to call for bids. The project scope includes grading and utilities, a playground, shaded picnic area, walking paths, turf area, planting and irrigation. The project is estimated to cost $715,000 for the base bid and will be funded by the JM-51 Neighborhood Park project budget in the Neighborhood Park - Sierra Vista Fund.

CONTACT: Joel De Jong 916-774-5924 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Approve plans and specifications for the JM-51 Park Project and authorize staff to call for bids.

15. JM-52 Park Project - Approval of Plans and Specifications and Authorize Staff to Call for Bids (PARKS, RECREATION, AND LIBRARIES DEPARTMENT - PARK DEVELOPMENT) Summary: Staff recommends City Council approval of plans and specifications for the JM-52 Park Project and authorize staff to call for bids. The project scope includes a playground, paved and natural walking paths, picnic area and seating, turf area, planting and irrigation. The project is

estimated to cost $475,000 for the base bid and will be funded by the JM-52 Neighborhood Park project budget in the Sierra Vista Neighborhood Park Fund.

CONTACT: Josh Cervantes 916-746-1233 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Approve the plans and specifications for the JM-52 Park Project and authorize staff to call for bids.

16. CO-61 Park Project - Approval of Plans and Specifications and Authorize Staff to Call for Bids (PARKS, RECREATION, AND LIBRARIES DEPARTMENT - PARK DEVELOPMENT) Summary: Staff recommends approval of plans and specifications for the CO-61 Park Project and authorize staff to call for bids. The project scope includes grading and utilities, a playground, picnic area, walking paths, turf area, planting and irrigation. The project is estimated to cost $1,395,000 and will be funded by the Campus Oaks Neighborhood Park Fund.

CONTACT: Joel De Jong 916-774-5924 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Approve plans and specifications for the CO-61 Park Project and authorize staff to call for bids.

17. Property Tax Revenue Consulting Services - Professional Services Agreement (FINANCE

DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a professional services agreement with HdL Coren & Cone to provide property tax revenue consulting services for an amount not to exceed $88,500 and a term of three years, with two optional one-year renewals. There are adequate funds available in the FY2025-26 adopted budget to fund this agreement.

CONTACT: Jeannine Thrash 916-774-5473 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-051 approving a professional services agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and HdL Coren & Cone, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

18. Resolution - Deneen Blair
Summary: Commend Deneen Blair, who is retiring from the Environmental Utilities Department, for more than thirty-one years of outstanding service and dedication to the City of Roseville, congratulate her for her many accomplishments, and wish her a long, healthy, and fulfilling retirement.

CONTACT: Arleta Wagenhals 916-774-5200 [email protected]

19. Minutes of Prior Meetings (CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT)

Summary: Staff recommends approval of the minutes of the February 4, 2026, Special Closed Session Meeting and minutes of the February 18, 2026, City Council Meeting.

CONTACT: Adilia Keller 916-774-5265 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Approve the minutes of the February 4, 2026, Special Closed Session Meeting and minutes of the February 18, 2026, City Council Meeting.

END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
VIII. PRESENTATIONS/REPORTS

20. Council Discretionary Funds Request - Volunteers of America, Northern California & Northern Nevada (CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT - ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER) Summary: Memo from Executive Assistant Heather Blanco and City Clerk Carmen Avalos requesting the City Council consider a request for a $3,000 sponsorship from Council Discretionary Funds for Volunteers of America, Northern California & Northern Nevada (VOA, NCNN) in support of the Voices of Hope fundraising event on April 30, 2026, from 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. at the DoubleTree Hilton Hotel. The money raised for the Voices of Hope fundraising event will serve individuals experiencing homelessness, including in Roseville. The event features a program presentation with speakers who share their life experiences and the impact of VOA’s services on their path to stability and independence. All attendees will be provided with a full breakfast. The sponsorship funds will be used to cover the costs of venue rental, catering, event marketing materials, etc. to ensure 100% of the event donations go towards program needs.

CONTACT: Heather Blanco 916-746-1171 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Consider a request for $3,000 sponsorship from Council Discretionary Funds for Volunteers of America, Northern California & Northern Nevada (VOA, NCNN) in support of the Voices of Hope fundraising event.

IX. PUBLIC HEARINGS
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC: Public Hearing Process
City Council, when considering the matter, will take the following actions:

1. Open the Public Hearing

2. Presentation by staff

3. Presentation by applicant or appellant

4. Accept public testimony

5. Appellant or applicant rebuttal period

6. Close the Public Hearing

7. City Council comments and questions

8. City Council action
Any challenges in court about public hearing matters noticed on this agenda may be limited to only those issues, that were raised orally at the public hearing or in written form received by the City on or before the hearing.

Public Hearings listed for continuance will be continued and posting of this agenda will serve as notice of continuation.

21. Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act Hearing for Siena Apartments (FINANCE DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends Council conduct a Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) Hearing to consider approval of the issuance of bonds by the California Statewide Communities Development Authority (CSCDA) in an amount not to exceed $17,000,000, for the benefit of Siena Roseville, L.P., to refinance the acquisition, rehabilitation, improvement and equipping of a 156-unit multifamily rental housing project generally known as Siena Apartments. Siena Roseville, L.P. has requested that CSCDA serve as the municipal issuer of tax-exempt multifamily housing revenue bonds. In order for all or a portion of the bonds to qualify as tax-exempt, the City must conduct a public hearing providing members of the community an opportunity to speak in favor of or against the use of tax-exempt bonds for the financing of the Project.

Adoption of the resolution is solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of TEFRA, the Internal Revenue Code, and California Government Code Section 6500. There is no fiscal impact to the City.

CONTACT: Jeannine Thrash 916-774-5473 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-054 approving the issuance by the California Statewide Communities Development Authority of exempt facility bonds for the Siena Apartments.

22. Roseville Municipal Code Updates - Electric General Service 5 Rate (ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT -

FINANCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE)
Summary: Staff recommends City Council introduce for first reading an ordinance amending sections 14.24.020 and 14.24.050 of Chapter 14.24 of the Roseville Municipal Code in regards to establishing a new General Service 5 rate class for Roseville Electric customers with recorded demand greater than 7,500 kW and a load factor of 85 percent or higher. The rate is designed to more accurately reflect the cost of service for extra-large customers with highly efficient usage patterns and maintain alignment with Roseville’s cost-based rate policy.

CONTACT: Kerri Crosby 916-746-1263 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Introduce for first reading an Ordinance amending sections 14.24.020 and 14.24.050 of Chapter 14.24 of the Roseville Municipal Code in regards to the Electric General Service 5 Rate.

X. PUBLIC COMMENTS

This is the second opportunity to make a public comment on non-agenda items.

XI. STAFF/COUNCIL REPORTS
XII. ADJOURNMENT

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 3/4/2026
Item #: V.1
File #: 0102-06
Item ID: 2026-119
Title: Proclamation - California Arbor Week
Contact: Arleta Wagenhals 916-774-5200 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Proclaim March 7-14, 2026 as California Arbor Week and urge all residents to observe and celebrate the week by planting trees for our benefit and for the benefit of future generations.

RECOMMENDATION
Proclaim March 7-14, 2026 as California Arbor Week and urge all residents to observe and celebrate the week by planting trees for our benefit and for the benefit of future generations.

BACKGROUND
Not Applicable

FISCAL IMPACT
Not Applicable

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378.

Council approval of a proclamation meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community

5. Support community engagement and advocacy

6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Arleta Wagenhals, City Clerk Technician
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
ATTACHMENTS:

1. CA Arbor Week Proclamation 2026
REVIEWERS:

Arleta Wagenhals, City Clerk Department Created/Initiated - 2/10/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 2/10/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Final Approval - 2/10/2026

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 3/4/2026
Item #: VII.2
File #: 0324-01
Item ID: 2026-37
Title: Resolution Declaring Public Weeds and Rubbish a Public Nuisance - Setting a Public Hearing Date
Contact: Jordan Paul 916-774-5802 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a resolution declaring weeds, rubbish, dirt, and/or rank growth within the City to be a public nuisance, as well as ordering the Fire Chief to give notice of the passage and setting a time and place for the required public hearing. The public hearing will be scheduled for the City Council meeting on Wednesday, April 15, 2026. Owners of private parcels that are abated by the City are responsible for the costs associated with providing abatement services. This item has no fiscal impact on the General Fund.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve a resolution declaring weeds, rubbish, dirt, and/or rank growth within the City of Roseville on the parcels identified on the attached list (based on available City GIS data at the time of the report) to be a public nuisance, as well as ordering the Fire Chief to give notice of the passage and the setting on the time and place for the required public hearing.

BACKGROUND
The Fire Department manages a very proactive and effective annual Weed Abatement Program. Each year all vacant parcels are identified and property owners are notified of their obligation to maintain adequate fire breaks as a fire protection/prevention measure. The fire and life safety requirements for vegetation management are contained in the California Fire Code, which is enforced by the Roseville Fire Department. Property owners are given an opportunity to abate hazards that exist on their parcels. The City only conducts abatement activities on private parcels once the owner has failed to abate the hazard by a pre-determined date specified by the Fire Department. Abatement costs related to private properties are billed to the respective property owners. The notification, public hearing, and cost recovery processes are specified in Chapter 9.20 of the Roseville Municipal Code.

The public hearing will be scheduled for the City Council meeting on Wednesday, April 15, 2026.

FISCAL IMPACT
Owners of private parcels that are abated by the City are responsible for the costs associated with providing abatement services. A bill is sent to each property owner detailing the abatement costs, as well as an administrative fee. If the property owner fails to pay the bill, the City places a lien on the subject property and the monies owed are reimbursed through the property tax collection process.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Weed Abatement Program involves minor alteration in the condition of the land, water, and/or vegetation and will not remove healthy, mature, scenic trees. This activity is categorically exempt from

CEQA as a Class 4 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15304). The Exemption has been prepared and no further CEQA action is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community
Respectfully Submitted,
Jordan Paul, Division Chief
Ryan Harrigan, Fire Chief
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 26-045

2. List of Parcels - Alpha Numeric by Street

3. List of Parcels - By APN

4. CEQA Exemption

5. Sample Letter

6. Public Notice
REVIEWERS:

Jordan Paul, Fire Department Created/Initiated - 2/11/2026 Deanna Schondelmayer, Fire Department Approved - 2/11/2026 Ryan Harrigan, Fire Department Approved - 2/11/2026
Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 2/17/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 2/18/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 2/19/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 2/19/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 2/19/2026 Dominick Casey, City Clerk Department Approved - 2/23/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 2/23/2026

RESOLUTION NO. 26-045

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE DECLARING ALL

WEEDS, DIRT, RUBBISH, AND/OR RANK GROWTHS WITHIN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE TO BE A NUISANCE; ORDERING THE FIRE CHIEF TO GIVE NOTICE OF THE PASSAGE OF THIS RESOLUTION; AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR

HEARING ANY OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED DESTRUCTION OR REMOVAL OF

SUCH WEEDS, DIRT, RUBBISH, OR RANK GROWTHS
WHEREAS, weeds, dirt, rubbish and rank growths are growing, located and existing on property within the City of Roseville and constitute a public nuisance; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Council to cause the abatement of that nuisance by destruction or removal of such weeds, dirt, rubbish and rank growths.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

That all weeds, dirt, rubbish and rank growths growing, located or existing on the property within the City of Roseville described by Placer County Assessor’s parcel numbers in the “Weed, Dirt, Rubbish and Rank Growths Abatement List – 2026”, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk, are hereby declared to be a public nuisance.

1. That the Fire Chief of the City of Roseville is hereby ordered to give notice of the passage of this resolution and required by law stating, among other things, that unless such nuisance is be abated without delay of the destruction or removal of the weeds, dirt, rubbish and rank growths, the nuisance will be abated by the city authorities and the expenses thereof assessed upon the lots, parcels and lands from or on which such nuisance is abated.

2. That Wednesday, April 15, 2026 at 6:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard, in the Roseville Electric Building, 116 S. Grant Street, Roseville, California, is hereby fixed as the time and place for hearing.

3. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to publish notice to destroy or remove those weeds, dirt, rubbish or rank growths declared therein to be a public nuisance at least twice in a newspaper published and circulated in the City of Roseville. The first publication of which shall be at least ten (10) days prior to the time fixed herein by this Council for hearing objections.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

Notice of Exemption
To: Placer County Clerk From: City of Roseville
Recorder’s Office Community Development Dept.
3091 County Center Dr. 311 Vernon Street
Auburn, CA 95603 Roseville, CA 95678
Project Title: 2026 Weed Abatement Project
(Resolution Declaring Weeds and Rubbish a Public Nuisance) Project Location(s): City-wide throughout Roseville
Project Description: The City of Roseville Fire Department proposes to notify property owners of vacant parcels, within the City, that a potential fire hazard exists on these parcels. If corrective action is not taken by the property owner the City’s Fire Department will proceed with weed abatement activities including, mechanical mowing, trimming, and other methods of weed removal.

Public Agency Approving Project: Roseville City Council Agency/Individual Carrying Out Project: City of Roseville Fire Department Reason why this Project is Exempt: This project is applicable to Class 4 Categorical Exemption as described in Section 15304 (i) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines which states:
“Class 4 consists of…minor public...alterations in the conditions of land which do not involve removal of healthy, mature, scenic trees…including but not limited to…fuel management activities…”
Lead Agency Contact Person: Jordan Paul, Fire Division Chief, Fire Department (916-774-5806) 316 Vernon Street, Roseville, CA 95678.

Signature:

Date: 2/10/2026
Jessica Lynch, Environmental Coordinator
City of Roseville

Our Mission… Protect and enhance the safety and well-being of residents, businesses, customers and partners We will accomplish this by…Delivering exceptional service and compassionate solutions as a cohesive team with dedication, pride and vigilance.

City of Roseville Fire Department • 316 Vernon St., #480 • Roseville, California 95678-2618 (916) 774-5800 • (916) 774-5810 FAX • (916) 774-5220 TDD • www.roseville.ca.us April 1, 2026

NOTICE TO ABATE FIRE HAZARD
This letter is intended for parcels that are undeveloped.

If the property has been developed or sold, please disregard the following and complete the information on the following page(s) and return it to the Roseville Fire Department, 316 Vernon Street, Suite 480, Roseville, CA 95678.

This letter is to notify you that a fire hazard may exist on the undeveloped parcel(s) listed on the following page(s). The law requires that all cut or uncut weeds, grass, vines, vegetation, or other combustible materials be removed when determined to be a fire hazard. Roseville Fire Code (RFC) 304.1.3; H&S Code, Division 12, Part 5.

If applicable, all necessary work shall be completed no later than July 1, 2026. If the property owner does not comply with this notice, the required firebreaks will be made by the City of Roseville. All costs incurred by the City, including a $356.00 per parcel administration fee, shall be billed directly to the property owner.

WEED ABATEMENT GUIDELINES
A clear firebreak of a minimum 30-foot width shall be created and maintained in all areas designated by the City of Roseville. Clear firebreaks shall be provided around all combustible buildings, fences, vehicles, structures, or storage on this parcel or on adjacent properties. We ask that you adhere to the following abatement requirements:

1. The preferred method of weed abatement shall be accomplished by discing and completed so that all weeds, grass, other vegetation or organic material which can be expected to burn are completely removed or turned under so there is insufficient fuel to sustain or allow the spread of fire.
• Discing does not negate the requirement for weed removal up to the structure.

2. Where discing is not practical, mowing is permitted where the material is mulched and the remaining weeds do not exceed two inches in height.

3. Spark arrestors shall be installed on all outdoor equipment with internal combustion engines.

4. Parcels that are one acre or less shall be completely abated.

Prior to abating weeds, seasonal rains should be considered. Late rains will produce late growing weeds.

Weeds once mowed, may require additional mowing. The weed abatement program’s intent is to reduce the fire hazard during fire season.

Our Mission… Protect and enhance the safety and well-being of residents, businesses, customers and partners We will accomplish this by…Delivering exceptional service and compassionate solutions as a cohesive team with dedication, pride and vigilance.

Notice to Abate Fire Hazard
Owner Name: Sample
Owner Address: 333 Sample Way
SACRAMENTO, CA 956XX
Assessor Parcel Number: 000-000-000-000
Site Address: 203 SAMPLE ST
Roseville, CA 956XX
Please check the box below depicting the current status of the property listed above.

This property has been developed.

This property has been sold.

If the property listed above has been sold, please provide the date of sale and contact information of the new owner below.

Date Sold: _______________________________________________________________ New Owner Name and Address: _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
Return to: Roseville Fire Department
316 Vernon St, Suite 480
Roseville, CA 95678
Please remember: If applicable, all necessary work shall be completed by July 1, 2026

PUBLIC NOTICE
Public Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held before the City Council of the City of Roseville for the purpose of considering the following:

WEED ABATEMENT HEARING
On March 4, 2026 pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 9.20 of the Roseville Municipal Code, the City Council of the City of Roseville adopted Resolution No. 26-XXX declaring that all weeds as defined in Section 9.20.010 (C) (1) of said chapter and all dirt, rubbish and/or rank growth, as defined in Section 9.20.010 (C) (2,3,4) of said chapter, of any kind on private property, or in any street or alley abutting any property, constitute a public nuisance which must be abated by the destruction or removal thereof.

All property owners, lessees or occupants of buildings, grounds or lots shall, without delay, destroy or remove all such weeds, dirt, rubbish and/or rank growths from their property and half of the abutting street and alley, if any, between the lot lines, as extended, or such weeds, dirt, rubbish and/or rank growths will be destroyed or removed and such nuisance abated by the city authorities, in which case the cost of destruction or removal will be assessed upon the lots and lands from or on which, or abutting the streets and alleys from or on which, such nuisance was abated, and such costs will constitute a lien upon the lots or parcels until paid and will be collected on the next tax roll upon which municipal taxes are collected.

All property owners having objections to the proposed abatement of the nuisances are hereby notified to attend a meeting of the Council of the City of Roseville to be held on April 15, 2026 at 6:00 o’clock p.m., or as soon thereafter as may be heard, in the Roseville Electric Building, 116 S. Grant Street, First Floor, Roseville, CA, where and when all objections will be heard and given due consideration.

FIRE CHIEF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

RYAN HARRIGAN

ROSEVILLE CITY COUNCIL

CARMEN AVALOS, CITY CLERK
DATED: March 4, 2026
PUBLISH: FRIDAY, April 3, 2026

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 3/4/2026
Item #: VII.3
File #: 0800-02 & 0201-01
Item ID: 2026-91
Title: Aquifer Storage Recovery Well and Pump Station Design Project - Professional Design Services Agreement Amendment and Budget Adjustment
Contact: Janice Gainey 916-774-5535 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a third amendment to the professional design services agreement with Carollo Engineers, Inc. for the Aquifer Storage Recovery Well and Pump Station Design Project in the amount of $1,028,656. The third amendment will increase the total not-to exceed contract amount from $6,369,033 to $7,397,689. This item also requests approval of a budget adjustment of $1,028,656 from the Water Construction Fund to fund the amendment.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt a resolution to approve a Third Amendment to the Professional Design Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers, Inc. for the Aquifer Storage Recovery Well and Pump Station Project and authorize the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

2. Adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment of $1,028,656 from available resources in the Water Construction Fund to fully fund the project.

BACKGROUND
The objective of this project is to support Roseville’s groundwater program by designing additional ASR wells to expand the capacity of the existing program, further diversifying Roseville’s water supply and ensure the City’s water supply continues to meet the needs of our customers and provide the foundation for a thriving economy.

After a competitive proposal process, a Professional Design Services Agreement was awarded to Carollo Engineers on April 1, 2020, for design and engineering support during construction for the Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) wells.

On January 19, 2022, an Amendment to Carollo’s contract (Amendment 1) was approved to provide design of water treatment facilities to address water quality related to the presence of iron and manganese compounds in ground water at the Westbrook (Well 9) and Solaire (Well 18) facilities. Amendment 1 also increased the scope of work to provide support of Programmable Logic Controllers (PLC) programming and Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system integration.

On June 5, 2024 an Amendment to Carollo’s contract (Amendment 2) was approved to approve a portion of optional Task 10 for the design of the next two ASR wells; Misty Wood (well 19) and Campus Oaks (well 13). Amendment 2 also requested additional Carollo scope for PLC and SCADA system programming and SCADA system integration on the Campus Oaks and Misty Wood wells to be included in their Contract Amendment 2.

The proposed scope of Amendment 3 incorporates two additions to the scope of the Original Contract under Task 10.

Task 10.1 - Additional Design Work and Construction Documents.

During the design and startup of construction of the Campus Oaks and Misty Wood wells, there have been unanticipated changes to the standard design and site-specific designs that require additional design efforts. These changes include incorporation of lessons learned after the startup and operation of the first two wells (Solaire and Westbrook) and the new equipment. • Structural and mechanical changes to the building and equipment. • Preparation of additional construction documents: There have been more plan review iterations required than originally anticipated that have extended the project schedule by six months, increased the number of allocated plan set submittals by approximately 50%, and subsequently will increase the level of effort required by Carollo Engineers. • Additional electrical design is required, including design of a backup generator duct bank routing and electrical room changes to accommodate changes to the City’s network cabinet. • Additional survey work is needed due to the relocation of monitoring wells at both the Misty Wood and Campus Oaks Well sites as a result of the horizontal locations of existing on-site utilities differing from record drawings.
• Changes due to site-specific conditions that were not anticipated when the original scope of work was developed, such as the addition of an energy dissipation structure for storm drain outlet, design of a small sewer lift station and force main, and fiber optic routing.

Task 10.3 - Additional efforts for Engineering Services During Construction Additional scope for engineering services during construction (ESDC) associated with the two additional ASR wells are due to unexpected field conditions that were discovered during construction that required re-design of some portions of the work.

FISCAL IMPACT
The requested budget adjustment of $1,028,656 for the Aquifer Storage and Recovery Wells – Design project will be funded from available resources in the Water Construction Fund. This amount will pay for the amendment with Carollo Engineers, Inc. bringing the new project budget to $7,699,742.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Project level CEQA compliance for the ASR Program was previously evaluated in the 2012 ASR Program EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 2009072018), which was certified by City Council on March 29, 2012. The Campus Oaks and Misty Wood well sites were added to the ASR Program and evaluated in the Supplement to the ASR EIR (certified December 17, 2020). The proposed amendment and all actions authorized within it are consistent with the projects evaluated in the previously certified and adopted CEQA documents, no new affects would be expected to occur, and all applicable mitigation measures from the CEQA documents will be implemented. As such, no additional CEQA action is required at this time.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth
Respectfully Submitted,
Janice Gainey, Principal Engineer
Sean Bigley, Environmental Utilities Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 26-041

2. Third Amendment to Agreement

3. Ordinance 7048
REVIEWERS:

Janice Gainey, Environmental Utilities Department - Water Created/Initiated - 2/3/2026 George Hanson, Environmental Utilities Department - Water Approved - 2/10/2026 Devin Whittington, Environmental Utilities Department Approved - 2/10/2026 Sean Bigley, Environmental Utilities Department - All Approved - 2/11/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 2/12/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 2/12/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 2/17/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 2/17/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 2/18/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 2/18/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 2/18/2026

RESOLUTION NO. 26-041

APPROVING A THIRD AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL DESIGN SERVICES

AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND CAROLLO ENGINEERS, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON

BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, a Third Amendment to Professional Design Services Agreement for the Aquifer Storage Recovery Well and Pump Station Project, by and between the City of Roseville and Carollo Engineers, Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said third amendment is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk

1 C:\Users\lippmelissa\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\0YMDOIDW\Carollo Engineers Inc Third Amendment.docx

THIRD AMENDMENT TO

PROFESSIONAL DESIGN SERVICES AGREEMENT
Aquifer Storage Recovery Well and Pump Station Project

THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL DESIGN SERVICES
AGREEMENT is made and entered into this ___ day of __________, 20__, by and between the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation (“CITY”), and Carollo Engineers, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“CONSULTANT”); and
W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, CITY and CONSULTANT previously entered into a Professional Design Services Agreement dated April 1, 2020, amended on January 19, 2022 , and June 5, 2024 (“Agreement”) regarding the design, construction, and installation for the Aquifer Storage Recovery Well and Pump Station Project (“Project”); and WHEREAS, CITY desires to amend the Agreement to include additional services as described in CONSULTANT’s letter/proposal dated November 5, 2025, which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, CONSULTANT is willing and able to provide such additional services; and NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

1. CONSULTANT shall provide additional services as described in Exhibit “A” of this Third Amendment to Agreement.

2 C:\Users\lippmelissa\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\0YMDOIDW\Carollo Engineers Inc Third Amendment.docx

2. Exhibit “B” to the Agreement is hereby replaced with Exhibit “B” to this Third Amendment to Agreement, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, which reflects updated rates for the term of the Third Amendment to Agreement.

3. Section 2 of the Agreement is amended by adding an additional paragraph to read as follows:
“CITY shall pay one million, twenty-eight thousand, six hundred fifty-six dollars ($1,028,656), in consideration of the additional services as set forth in Exhibit “A” to the Third Amendment to Agreement. This brings the total not to exceed contract amount to seven million three hundred ninety-seven thousand six hundred eighty-nine dollars ($7,397,689).”

4. All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation, has authorized the execution of this Third Amendment to Agreement in duplicate by its City Manager and attested to by its City Clerk under the authority of Resolution No. _________, adopted by the Council of the City of Roseville on the ___ day of ___________, 20__, and CONSULTANT has caused this Third Amendment to Agreement to be executed.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE, a CAROLLO ENGINEERS, INC., a
municipal corporation Delaware corporation
BY: _______________________________ BY: _______________________________ DOMINICK CASEY its: _______________________________
City Manager
(SIGNATURES CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE)
Senior Vice President Page 30 of 1714
3 C:\Users\lippmelissa\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\0YMDOIDW\Carollo Engineers Inc Third Amendment.docx and
ATTEST:

BY: _______________________________
its: _______________________________
BY: _______________________________

CARMEN AVALOS
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: _______________________________

MICHELLE SHEIDENBERGER
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO SUBSTANCE:

BY: _______________________________

SEAN BIGLEY
Environmental Utilities Director
Vice President Page 31 of 1714
4 C:\Users\lippmelissa\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\0YMDOIDW\Carollo Engineers Inc Third Amendment.docx EXHIBIT “A”

11/5/2025 Page 1
AMENDMENT NO. 3 SCOPE OF SERVICES
City of Roseville
Environmental Utilities Department
Professional Design Services Agreement - Aquifer Storage and Recovery Wells Project November 5, 2025

PURPOSE
The purpose of this Amendment 3 is to describe additional services to be provided by the Carollo Engineers consultant team to support the Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) Wells Design Project.

This amendment incorporates two additions to scope of the Original Contract under Task 10.

1. Additional Design Work and Construction Documents.

2. Additional efforts required for Engineering Services During Construction.

Task 10. This task was identified in the original project proposal as “optional” and provided a scope and fee for Detailed Design and Engineering Services During Construction (ESDC) for four additional wells. Amendment 2 authorized this scope for two of the four originally contemplated additional wells; Well 13 Campus Oaks and Well 19 Misty Wood.

A description of the additional scope of work for each of these tasks is provided below. Task numbers have been selected to align with existing project scope tasks.

TASK 10 Detailed Design and Engineering Services During Construction For Campus Oaks And Misty Wood Wells
TASK 10 - BACKGROUND AND CONSIDERATIONS
As part of Environmental Utilities’ long-term water supply planning, six sites were identified for well installations enabling the City to implement the conjunctive use of surface and groundwater to enhance water supply reliability. The new well facilities were to be constructed with the capability for groundwater extraction and surface water injection. This conjunctive use feature of the wells is more broadly termed Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR).

In April 2020 Carollo was awarded a Professional Design Services Agreement for Design and ESDCs for this project.

The approach and scope of services outlined in the original proposal identified the scope of services for the first two wells as “Package 1” and included the Well 9 Westbrook and Well 18 Solaire ASR wells. An optional task (Task 10) described the scope of services for four additional wells and described this as “Package 2”. Amendment 2 split Package 2 into two parts.

11/5/2025 Page 2
Package 2 will now consist of the scope of services for just two (2) wells; Well 13 Campus Oaks and Well 19 Misty Wood. A future Package 3 is anticipated to provide scope of services for the final two wells.

TASK 10 - SCOPE
The scope of work for this Amendment 3 will be as described in Optional Task 10 from the original contract, with the exception that it is for two wells instead of four. An outline of that scope is included here with full details included in the original contract.

TASK 10 – Detailed Design and ESDC for 2 Additional Wells (Campus Oaks and Misty Wood). Under this optional task detailed design and ESDC will be performed for the 2 additional wells previously implemented through the PDR phase. It is assumed that the detailed design of these two well sites (Package 2) will be similar in concept to the previous Package 1 well designs, with minor modifications to account for well and site characteristics only.

TASK 10.1 - CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
Under this task Carollo will further develop sets of detailed design drawings and construction specifications for this project: one for construction of each of the 2 additional ASR well sites.

The mechanical, process, structural, electrical, and instrumentation design from the first two ASR wells, Well 9 Westbrook and Well 18 Solaire, was intended to be the standard design that would be used as the template for four additional ASR wells. It was expected that the civil site and utility plans would differ slightly since they are site dependent.

During the design and startup of construction of the Campus Oaks and Misty Wood wells there have been unanticipated changes to the standard design and site-specific designs requiring additional design efforts.

A. Standard Design Revisions
There were many small changes made to the first two wells, Well 9 Westbrook and Well 18 Solaire, design during construction which were incorporated into the record drawings and became a revised standard design to be implemented on the next 4 wells. During design of the next two wells, Well 13 Campus Oaks and Well 19 Misty Wood, some significant changes were made to the standard design because of lessons learned after the startup and operation of the first two wells and equipment updates. These changes required additional design efforts and included the following.
• Structural and Mechanical changes to the building and equipment o The standard structural design was edited to add a separate chemical trench drain and pipe chase from the chemical to the pump room, and relocate the chemical sump, water softener, and rollup door within the chemical room. o The pre-engineered perimeter wall was replaced with a CMU block wall due to limitations to accessorizing the wall for equipment mounting and screening alternatives (lights and security cameras).

11/5/2025 Page 3
o The structural building design was updated to reduce the weight of the blocks for value engineering. The Contractor added value engineering for the CMU building and the perimeter wall by reducing the block size and weight. Both of which required additional engineering calculations and re-design. o The vertical strainer and angle pressure reducing valve were repositioned into a horizontal arrangement which changed the layout of the above ground mechanical piping, the model of the magnetic flow meter, chemical injection points, and tubing layout.
o The small diameter and distant location of the existing monitoring wells changed the sampling and testing plan. After consideration, the sampling pumps and conductivity analyzers were removed from the design and replaced with a manual sampling program.
o The preferred sodium hypochlorite system installed at the first two wells proved to be difficult, so a new chemical meter pump was designed and specified. • Additional preparation of construction documents
o There were more plan review iterations than originally anticipated that pushed back the project schedule and increased the level of effort and the number of allocated submittals.
• Additional Electrical Design
o Addition of a permanent generator duct bank routing under the building slab modifications to the slab foundation and utility plans was required. o The electrical equipment in the electrical room was shifted to accommodate changes to the City network cabinet.
o Electrical equipment in the pump room was relocated to allow better access to the mechanical equipment.
• Additional Survey Work
o An additional topographic survey was completed because the monitoring well was installed on the opposite side of the site causing the civil layout to be rearranged.
o Another topographic survey was performed after Painted Desert Drive was constructed because the horizontal locations of the utilities differed from the design drawings. The large water service and the power conduits were realigned because they did not line up with the perimeter wall, building, well, storm drain, and transformer locations.

B. Site Specific Conditions
Based on record drawings there were some assumptions made in the original scope of work and budget that wet and dry utility services are available at the back of curb. Site specific conditions requiring additional design efforts included the following. o At the Misty Wood site an energy dissipation structure was added to the storm drain outlet and cross culvert to accommodate well flushing flow rates. o A gravity sewer lateral was not supplied to the Misty Wood site. Two additional topographic surveys and associated planning were performed to explore two

11/5/2025 Page 4
alternative gravity sewer routes. In the end a small sewer lift station and force main were designed.
o Fiber Optic was not provided to the Campus Oaks site as described in the Development Agreement and was designed by Carollo.

TASK 10.3 - ENGINEERING SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION (PACKAGE 2) Additional scope for engineering services during construction (ESDC), associated with the two additional ASR wells are due to unexpected field conditions that were discovered during construction that required re-design of some portions of the work.

There were some unexpected field conditions discovered during the initial phases of construction that increased the level of effort required to promptly respond to RFIs, Design Clarifications, and Contract Change Orders during construction. The design-assist team including the Engineer, Contractor, Construction Manager, and the City collaborated to make the necessary changes quickly to keep the project on schedule to meet the funding deadline.

Changes made during construction included aesthetic and structural alterations to the CMU perimeter wall due to public opinion, a wall back drain system that was added when a perched groundwater table was discovered during rough grading, additional scope to provide fiber optic cable to the sites because it was not installed as previously coordinated, and multiple revisions to the underground utility plans for power, water, sewer, and storm drain that were required to account for the differences in what was shown in the record utility drawings and what was found in the field.

TASK 10 - COST
Task 10.1 fees are for effort required to make modifications to the standard design between the construction of the first two wells Well 9 Westbrook and Well 18 Solaire Well and the construction of the next two wells, Well 13 Campus Oaks and Well 19 Misty Wood.

The fees for Task 10.3 are for the additional ESDC effort to account for unexpected field conditions discovered during construction and to continue ESDC services throughout construction including the review of equipment and materials submittals, respond to requests for information and design clarifications, progress and special meetings, field visits, start-up and commissioning, operator training, record drawings, and asset management.

The estimated cost to complete the detailed design and ESDC services for the next two wells, Well 13 Campus Oaks and Well 19 Misty Wood is $1,028,656. These costs are effective until January 2027. Cost for Task 10 is detailed in the attached fee proposal; Attachment A. Costs will be billed monthly on a time and materials not-to-exceed basis. Hourly rates are shown in the attached Fee Schedule, Attachment B.

TASK 10 - SCHEDULE

11/5/2025 Page 5
The schedule of completion for the work described in this base scope of services is for the approximately 12 months remaining of the original 18 months from the Notice to Proceed.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A – Amendment 3 Fee Proposal
Attachment B – Fee Schedule

PROJECT
TOTAL
PIC Advisor Sr. PM PM Arch Lead Str. PE Staff Eng. Elec IC SCADA HVAC Asset Mgmt Hann Peterson Cleveland Ducker Architect Structural Project Engineer Electrical Instr & Controls SCADA HVAC Staff 2025 Rates $337 $337 $337 $337 $354 $337 $232 $375 $285 $232 $285 $232 $243 $175 $150 $162026 Rates $351 $351 $351 $351 $369 $351 $242 $390 $297 $242 $297 $242 $253 $182 $156 $17 Task Task DescriptionOPTIONAL SCOPE10 Scope for 4 Well Sites Tasks 5-8.9

10.1 Construction Docs for 4 Addt'l Wells 10 10 434 44 110 542 44 44 12 160 160 16 1,586 433,128$ 25,376$ 458,504$ 458,504$

10.2 Permit Assistance for 4 Addt'l Wells - -$ -$ -$ -$

10.3 ESDC for 4 Addt'l Wells 12 - 12 600 52 104 520 104 104 52 72 72 72 16 1,792 538,688$ 30,464$ 1,000$ 570,152$ 570,152$ TASK 10 TOTAL 22 - 22 1,034 96 214 1,062 148 148 - 64 72 232 232 32 3,378 971,816$ 55,840$ 1,000$ 1,028,656$ 1,028,656$ Notes:1 Project Equipment and Communication Expense.2 Field services for test well drilling and geotechnical borings include prevailing wages and certfifed payroll in accordance with local, state, and federal laws.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE

ASR WELL & PUMP STATION PROJECT

ATTACHMENT A - FEE PROPOSAL
CAD
Tech
Doc.

Process.

Total
Hours
Labor
Cost
Carollo Engineers, Inc.

Sr. CAD
Tech
Carollo
Subtotal
PECE1
Expenses

ATTACHMENT A

5 C:\Users\lippmelissa\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\0YMDOIDW\Carollo Engineers Inc Third Amendment.docx EXHIBIT “B”

CAROLLO ENGINEERS, INC.

FEE SCHEDULE
As of January 1, 2025

Billing Classification Hourly Rate
Engineers/Scientists
Senior Project Manager $ 364.00
Project Manager $ 364.00
Senior Design Manager $ 364.00
Senior Program Manager $ 364.00
Program Manager $ 304.00
Principal Professional $ 364.00
Senior Service Delivery Lead $ 364.00
Service Delivery Lead $ 359.00
Supervising Professional $ 361.00
Design Manager II $ 366.00
Design Manager I $ 275.00
Senior Professional $ 282.00
Lead Professional $ 265.00
Professional $ 233.00
Staff Professional $ 226.00
Engineering Intern $ 141.00
Supervising Analyst $ 284.00
Senior Analyst $ 263.00
Lead Analyst $ 236.00
Staff Analyst $ 217.00
Technicians
Supervising BIM Designer $ 313.00
Senior BIM Designer $ 265.00
Lead BIM Designer $ 260.00
BIM Designer 3 $ 233.00
BIM Designer 2 $ 225.00
BIM Designer 1 $ 221.00
Supervising Designer $ 245.00
Lead Designer $ 237.00
Senior Designer $ 210.00
Designer $ 179.00
Staff Designer $ 181.00
Senior Drafter $ 175.00
CAD Drafter $ 161.00
Construction Management and Operations
ATTACHMENT B Page 40 of 1714
CAROLLO ENGINEERS, INC.

FEE SCHEDULE
As of January 1, 2025

Billing Classification Hourly Rate

Senior Construction Manager $ 364.00
Principal Construction Manager $ 347.00
Construction Manager $ 337.00
Supervising Cost Estimator $ 350.00
Lead Cost Estimator $ 233.00
Resident Project Representative $ 305.00
Lead Inspector $ 259.00
Inspector $ 243.00
Resident Engineer $ 223.00
Principal Operations Specialist $ 335.00
Operations Lead $ 364.00
Operations Specialist $ 305.00
Field Professional $ 238.00
Support Staff
Senior Project Services Administrator $ 254.00
Project Services Administrator $ 202.00
Lead Document Processor $ 198.00
Document Processor II $ 172.00
Document Processor I $ 157.00
Administrative Assistant $ 141.00

Project Equipment Communication Expense (PECE) Per DL Hour $ 16.00 Other Direct Expenses
Travel and Subsistence Cost + 10%
Mileage $ 0.70 per mile
Subconsultant Cost + 10%
Other Direct Cost Cost + 10%
Expert Witness Hourly Rate x 2.0
This fee schedule is subject to annual revisions due to labor adjustments.

ORDINANCE NO. 7048

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-26

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2025-26, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for the Aquifer Storage Recovery Well and Pump Station Project.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the ordinance book, under the record of the ordinance, a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of such publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
Updated 11/19/2025
Please complete the cells highlighted in yellow.

REQUESTER NAME & TITLE:

PREPARER NAME & TITLE:

DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT
FISCAL YEAR:

ORDINANCE:

ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment

DESCRIPTION
6120 5301 84001 500155 1,028,656 Increase professional services budget for Aquifer Storage and Recovery Well - Design Project 500155
EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL 1,028,656

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment

DESCRIPTION

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN TOTAL -
NET ADJUSTMENT 1,028,656

FUND BALANCE
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment

DESCRIPTION
6120 3601 00000 000000 (1,028,656) Decrease available resources in the Water Construction Fund (6120)
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
3601 00000 000000
FUND BALANCE TOTAL (1,028,656)
Justification for Budget Adjustment:

The Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) Well - Design Project (500155) requires a Third Amendment with Carollo Engineers for $1,028,656. During the design and startup of construction of the Campus Oaks and Misty Wood wells there have been unanticipated changes to the standard design and site-specific designs requiring additional design efforts. These changes included incorporation of lessons learned after the startup and operation of the first two wells and the new equipment. Additional scope is required for engineering services during construction (ESDC) associated with the two additional ASR wells due to unexpected field conditions that were discovered during construction that required re-design of some portions of the work. The existing project budget currently is $6,671,086; this budget adjustment would bring the new project budget total to $7,699,742.□ Janice Gainey, Principal Engineer 2025-26
Linda York, EU Business Analyst
EU Water Engineering and Hydrology

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 3/4/2026
Item #: VII.4
File #: 0323
Item ID: 2026-67
Title: Roseville Municipal Code Ordinance - Military Equipment Policy Contact: Scott Blynn 916-774-5079 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends adoption of findings pursuant to California Government Code Section 7071 and 7072, and introduce for first reading an ordinance renewing Ordinance 6463 and readopting and continuing Roseville Police Department Policy No. 706, titled “Military Equipment”, thereby authorizing the Roseville Police Department’s continued use of “military equipment”, as defined by Government Code Section 7070.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt findings pursuant to California Government Code Section 7071 and 7072, and introduce for first reading an ordinance renewing Ordinance 6463 and readopting and continuing Roseville Police Department Policy No. 706, titled “Military Equipment”, thereby authorizing the Roseville Police Department’s continued use of “military equipment”, as defined by Government Code Section 7070.

BACKGROUND
Brief History of AB 481
Assembly Bill 481 (“AB 481”), signed by Governor Newsom in September 2021, required that law enforcement agencies obtain approval from the agency’s governing body (here, the City Council) prior to purchasing or acquiring military equipment, using military equipment, and/or collaborating with other law enforcement agencies in the deployment or use of military equipment within the governing body’s territorial jurisdiction.

Such approval by the City Council was required to be in the form of an Ordinance, adopting a publicly released, written military equipment policy. AB 481 also required that the military equipment policy address a number of specific topics, including the type, quantity, capabilities, purposes, and authorized uses of each type of military equipment, the fiscal impact of their acquisition and use, the legal and procedural rules that govern their use, the training required by any officer allowed to use the equipment, the mechanisms in place to ensure policy compliance, and the procedures by which the public may submit complaints. To adopt such an Ordinance, the City Council was also required to make the following findings:

1. The military equipment is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety.

2. The proposed military equipment use policy will safeguard the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties.

3. If purchasing the equipment, the equipment is reasonably cost effective compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety.

4. Prior military equipment use complied with the military equipment use policy that was in effect at the time, or if prior uses did not comply with the accompanying military equipment use policy, corrective action has been taken to remedy nonconforming uses and ensure future compliance.

City’s Original Adoption of Military Equipment Policy
At its March 1, 2022 meeting, the City Council was presented with Ordinance 6463, which included the findings required by AB 481 and, if adopted, would approve and adopt a Military Equipment policy for the Roseville Police Department. The City Council elected to move forward with the Military Equipment Policy and introduced Ordinance 6463 for first reading that evening. At its March 15, 2022 meeting, the City Council completed the second reading and adopted Ordinance 6463, thereby approving and adopting Roseville Police Department Policy No. 706, titled “Military Equipment”.

Annual Review and Renewal of Military Equipment Policy
AB 481 further requires that the City Council review any ordinance adopted pursuant to AB 481 at least annually, and to vote on whether to “renew” the ordinance. In making this decision, the City Council is required to determine whether each type of military equipment owned by the City complied with the findings originally made during adoption of the ordinance. This determination is to be based on an annual “report” prepared by the Police Department that includes at least the following information for each type of military equipment approved for use:

1. A summary of how the military equipment was used and the purpose of its use.

2. A summary of any complaints or concerns received concerning the military equipment.

3. The results of any internal audits, any information about violations of the military equipment use policy, and any actions taken in response.

4. The total annual cost for each type of military equipment, including acquisition, personnel, training, transportation, maintenance, storage, upgrade, and other ongoing costs, and from what source funds will be provided for the military equipment in the calendar year following submission of the annual military equipment report.

5. The quantity possessed for each type of military equipment.

6. If the law enforcement agency intends to acquire additional military equipment in the next year, the quantity sought for each type of military equipment.

This annual report must also be made publicly available on the Police Department’s website, and the Department must hold at least one well-publicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting at which the general public may discuss and ask questions regarding the annual military equipment report and the Department’s funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment.

Prior Renewals
The City’s Military Equipment policy for the Roseville Police Department was renewed for the first time in 2023. The Roseville Police Department prepared an Annual Report that covered the initial reporting period of April 16, 2022 (the day the Department’s Military Equipment Policy first became effective) to December

31, 2022. The Report included all of the information required by AB 481, was published on the Department’s webpage, and the Roseville Police Department held the requisite community engagement meeting. In March 2023, the City Council introduced and thereafter approved an uncodified ordinance readopting and continuing the Roseville Police Department’s Military Equipment Policy. The Military Equipment Policy has been renewed in the same manner each year since.

Roseville Police Department Annual Report & Current Renewal of the Military Equipment Policy The Roseville Police Department has prepared an Annual Report that covers the reporting period of January 1, 2025 to December 31, 2025. The Report, attached herewith, includes all of the information required by AB 481 and was published on the Department’s webpage on February 5, 2026. The Roseville Police Department also held a community engagement meeting on February 10, 2026, at 5:00 p.m. at the Roseville Police Department. The general public was invited to attend the meeting to discuss and ask questions regarding the annual military equipment report and the Department’s funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment. Notice of the meeting was published on the City’s main webpage, the City events calendar, and the City’s and Police Department’s social media pages. Approximately 4 members of the community attended the meeting, and no community members expressed any opposition to or concern with the Annual Report or the Department’s Military Equipment Policy.

Council Action to Renew the Ordinance and Military Equipment Policy As noted above, AB 481 requires that the City Council “review” the military equipment ordinance, annual report, and policy, and make a determination as to whether the type of military equipment included in the policy has complied with the standards of approval originally adopted by Council. If determined to comply, the governing body can “vote to renew the ordinance” and the corresponding Military Equipment Policy.

Because “renewal” of an ordinance is not a traditional City action, it is recommended that Council adopt a new uncodified ordinance making all relevant findings, renewing Ordinance 6463, and readopting and continuing the Roseville Police Department’s Military Equipment Policy. No substantive changes are being made to the Military Equipment Policy. Copies of the proposed ordinance and Roseville Police Department Policy No. 706, titled “Military Equipment”, are attached. It is recommended that Council introduce for first reading an uncodified ordinance renewing Ordinance 6463 and readopting and continuing Roseville Police Department Policy No. 706, titled “Military Equipment”, which will allow for the continued use of “military equipment” as defined by Government Code section 7070.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the proposed policy as the equipment identified in the “Military Equipment” policy has already been budgeted for and acquired. Any future equipment would be subject to approved budgets at the time of acquisition and approval.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute Section 21065 and CEQA State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) and Section 15378. The proposed Ordinance meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community

5. Support community engagement and advocacy

6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Scott Blynn, Police Lieutenant
Troy Bergstrom, Police Chief
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Ordinance renewing Military Equipment Policy (2026)

2. 2026 Annual Report (combined)

3. Policy 706 Military Equipment

4. Ordinance_6463_(final_signed) (1)
REVIEWERS:

Travis Cochran, City Attorney Department Created/Initiated - 2/11/2026 Liz Luevano, City Clerk Department Approved - 2/13/2026 Troy Bergstrom, Police Department Approved - 2/16/2026
Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 2/17/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 2/17/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 2/17/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 2/17/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 2/18/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 2/18/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 2/19/2026

1 ORDINANCE NO. ___
RENEWING CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDINANCE 6463 AND READOPTING AND CONTINUING ROSEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY NO. 706, TITLED “MILITARY EQUIPMENT”
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1.

A. On September 30, 2021, Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law Assembly Bill 481, relating to the use of military equipment by law enforcement agencies.

Assembly Bill 481, codified at California Government Code sections 7070 through 7075, requires law enforcement agencies to obtain approval of the applicable governing body, by an ordinance adopting a “military equipment” use policy, at a regular meeting held pursuant to open meeting laws, prior to taking certain actions relating to the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment.

The term “military equipment” is defined in California Government Code section 7070(c). Assembly Bill 481 allows the governing body of a city to approve the funding, acquisition, and/or use of military equipment within its jurisdiction only if it makes specified findings.

B. At its March 1, 2022 meeting, the City Council was presented with Ordinance 6463, which included the findings required by AB 481 and, if adopted, would approve and adopt a Roseville Police Department Policy No. 706, titled “Military Equipment”. The proposed Military Equipment Policy was consistent with AB 481 and based on a model policy utilized by many other law enforcement agencies in California. The City Council elected to move forward with the Military Equipment Policy and introduced Ordinance 6463 for first reading that evening.

C. At its March 15, 2022 meeting, the City Council completed the second reading and adopted Ordinance 6463, thereby approving and adopting Roseville Police Department Policy No. 706, titled “Military Equipment”. Through adoption of Ordinance 6463, the City Council also made the following findings:

1. The “military equipment” (as defined by California Government Code section 7070(c)) is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety;

2. The “Military Equipment” Policy No. 706 will safeguard the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties;

3. The current “military equipment” identified in “Military Equipment” Policy No. 706 and purchasing any future “military equipment” on the list of “military equipment” (as defined by California Government Code section 7070(c)) is reasonably cost effective compared to available

2 alternatives that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety; and

4. Prior “military equipment” use complied with the military equipment use policy that was in effect at the time.

D. AB 481 further requires that the City Council review any ordinance adopted pursuant to AB 481 at least annually, and to vote on whether to “renew” the ordinance. In making this decision, the City Council is required to determine whether each type of military equipment owned by the City complied with the findings originally made during adoption of the ordinance. This determination is to be based on an annual report prepared by the Police Department that includes at least the following information for each type of military equipment approved for use:

1. A summary of how the military equipment was used and the purpose of its use;

2. A summary of any complaints or concerns received concerning the military equipment;

3. The results of any internal audits, any information about violations of the military equipment use policy, and any actions taken in response;

4. The total annual cost for each type of military equipment, including acquisition, personnel, training, transportation, maintenance, storage, upgrade, and other ongoing costs, and from what source funds will be provided for the military equipment in the calendar year following submission of the annual military equipment report;

5. The quantity possessed for each type of military equipment; and

6. If the law enforcement agency intends to acquire additional military equipment in the next year, the quantity sought for each type of military equipment.

The annual report must also be made publicly available on the Roseville Police Department’s webpage, and the Department must also hold at least one wellpublicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting at which the general public may discuss and ask questions regarding the annual military equipment report and the Department’s funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment.

E. On February 5, 2026, the Roseville Police Department published its Annual Report regarding AB 481 and the Military Equipment Policy to the Department’s webpage. The Report covers the reporting period of January 1,

3 2025, through December 31, 2025, and includes all information required by AB 481. The Roseville Police Department also held a community engagement meeting on February 10, 2026, at 5:00 p.m. at the Roseville Police Department.

The meeting was well-publicized, and the general public was invited to attend to discuss and ask questions regarding the annual military equipment report and the Department’s funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment.

F. On March 4, 2026, the Annual Report for the period of January 1, 2025 through December 31, 2025, regarding AB 481 and the City of Roseville Police Department’s Military Equipment Police was submitted to the City Council pursuant to Government Code section 7072.

SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Roseville makes the following findings:

A. The City Council has reviewed Ordinance 6461, which was adopted pursuant to AB 481 and approved the funding, acquisition, or use of “military equipment” and approved and adopted Roseville Police Department Policy No. 706, titled “Military Equipment”.

B. The City Council was presented with the Annual Report, covering the period of January 1, 2025 through December 31, 2025, prepared by the Roseville Police Department pursuant to Government Code sections 7071 and 7072.

C. Based on the Annual Report prepared by the Roseville Police Department and submitted to the City Council, the City Council determines that each type of “military equipment” identified in the Report has complied with the standards of approval set forth in Government Code section 7071, subsection (d), and adopted by the City Council through Ordinance 6463.

D. The Roseville Police Department Policy No. 706, titled “Military Equipment”, meets all requirements of Government Code sections 7070 – 7075.

E. Ordinance 6463 is renewed and Roseville Police Department Policy No. 706, titled “Military Equipment”, is approved and readopted.

SECTION 3. This ordinance shall be effective at the expiration of thirty (30) days from the date of its adoption.

SECTION 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause this ordinance to be published in full at least once within fourteen (14) days after it is adopted in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, or shall within fourteen (14) days after its adoption cause this ordinance to be posted in full in at least three (3) public places in the City and enter in the OrdinanceBook a certificate stating the time and place of said publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of _______________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

4 AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk

APPENDIX A MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE

DATE MILITARY EQUIPMENT USED REASON FOR USE
Jan 1st, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jan 4th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jan 9th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jan 9th, 2025 Bearcat Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Jan 9th, 2025 TRV Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Jan 9th, 2025 TAG SWAT Sprinter Van Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Jan 9th, 2025 40 MM CS Barricade 4330 Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Jan 9th, 2025 40 MM Baton Extended Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Jan 9th, 2025 9 Bang Flashbang Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Jan 12th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jan 13th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jan 15th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jan 15th, 2025 TAG SWAT Sprinter Van Patrol Assist Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Jan 24th, 2025 Avata 2 UAS - Patrol Assist
Jan 24th, 2025 Bearcat Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out

APPENDIX A MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE
Jan 24th, 2025 TRV Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Jan 24th, 2025 TAG SWAT Sprinter Van Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Jan 26th, 2025 Avata 2 UAS - Patrol Assist
Jan 26th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jan 30th, 2025 Avata 2 UAS - Patrol Assist
Jan 30th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jan 30th, 2025 Bearcat Patrol Assist Search Warrant SWAT call-out Jan 30th, 2025 TRV Patrol Assist Search Warrant SWAT call-out Jan 30th, 2025 TAG SWAT Sprinter Van Patrol Assist Search Warrant SWAT call-out Jan 30th, 2025 Bearcat Patrol Assist Search Warrant SWAT call-out Jan 30th, 2025 TRV Patrol Assist Search Warrant SWAT call-out Jan 30th, 2025 TAG SWAT Sprinter Van Patrol Assist Search Warrant SWAT call-out Jan 31st, 2025 ICOR Robot Patrol Assist suspicious package Feb 4th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Feb 4th, 2025 Avata 2 UAS - Patrol Assist
Feb 4th, 2025 Bearcat Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Feb 4th, 2025 TRV Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out

APPENDIX A MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE
Feb 4th, 2025 TAG SWAT Sprinter Van Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Feb 4th, 2025 Flashbang Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Feb 8th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Feb 9th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Feb 9th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Feb 9th, 2025 Avata 2 UAS - Patrol Assist
Feb 10th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Feb 10th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Feb 10th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Feb 11th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Feb 12th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Feb 12th, 2025 Bearcat Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Feb 12th, 2025 TRV Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Feb 12th, 2025 TAG SWAT Sprinter Van Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Feb 14th, 2025 Avata 2 UAS - Patrol Assist
Feb 19th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Feb 20th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist

APPENDIX A MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE
Feb 21st, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Feb 22nd, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Feb 22nd, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Feb 23rd, 2025 Bearcat Patrol Assist Search Warrant SWAT call-out Feb 23rd, 2025 TRV Patrol Assist Search Warrant SWAT call-out Feb 23rd, 2025 TAG SWAT Sprinter Van Patrol Assist Search Warrant SWAT call-out Feb 26th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Feb 26th, 2025 Bearcat Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Feb 26th, 2025 TRV Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Feb 26th, 2025 TAG SWAT Sprinter Van Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Mar 1st, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Mar 2nd, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Mar 2nd, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Mar 3rd, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Mar 3rd, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Mar 3rd, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Mar 4th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist

APPENDIX A MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE
Mar 6th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Mar 6th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Mar 8th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Mar 9th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Mar 9th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Mar 9th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Mar 10th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Mar 11th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Mar 17th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Mar 18th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Mar 20th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Mar 26th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Mar 30th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Apr 1st, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Apr 2nd, 2025 Bearcat Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Apr 2nd, 2025 Bearcat Patrol Assist Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Apr 6th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist

APPENDIX A MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE
Apr 7th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Apr 8th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Apr 9th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Apr 11th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Apr 13th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Apr 15th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Apr 16th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Apr 17th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Apr 18th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Apr 20th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Apr 21st, 2025 TAG SWAT Sprinter Van Patrol Assist Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Apr 23rd, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Apr 23rd, 2025 Bearcat Patrol Assist Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Apr 23rd, 2025 TRV Patrol Assist Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Apr 23rd, 2025 TAG SWAT Sprinter Van Patrol Assist Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Apr 23rd, 2025 40 MM CS Barricade 4330 Patrol Assist Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out

APPENDIX A MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE
Apr 23rd, 2025 Mobile Command Post Patrol Assist Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Apr 26th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Apr 30th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Apr 30th, 2025 Avata 2 UAS - Patrol Assist
May 1st, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 4th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 9th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 10th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 11th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 13th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 13th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 13th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 13th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 14th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 14th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 14th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 14th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist

APPENDIX A MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE
May 14th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 16th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 18th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 19th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 19th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 19th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 20th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 20th, 2025 Avata 2 UAS - Patrol Assist
May 20th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 20th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 20th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 20th, 2025 Bearcat Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out May 20th, 2025 TRV Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out May 20th, 2025 TAG SWAT Sprinter Van Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out May 20th, 2025 Flashbang Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out May 21st, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 21st, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist

APPENDIX A MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE
May 21st, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 21st, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 21st, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 21st, 2025 Bearcat Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out May 21st, 2025 TRV Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out May 21st, 2025 TAG SWAT Sprinter Van Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out May 21st, 2025 40 MM CS Barricade 4330 Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out May 21st, 2025 Mobile Command Post Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out May 22nd, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 22nd, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 22nd, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 22nd, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 23rd, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 23rd, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 23rd, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 27th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist

APPENDIX A MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE
May 28th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 28th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 28th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 28th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 28th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 29th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 29th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 29th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 29th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 29th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 29th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 30th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 30th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 30th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 31st, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
May 31st, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jun 3rd, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist

APPENDIX A MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE
Jun 3rd, 2025 Avata 2 UAS - Patrol Assist
Jun 3rd, 2025 Bearcat Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Jun 3rd, 2025 TAG SWAT Sprinter Van Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Jun 4th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jun 4th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jun 4th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jun 4th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jun 4th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jun 5th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jun 5th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jun 6th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jun 7th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jun 8th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jun 10th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jun 11th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jun 12th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jun 12th, 2025 Bearcat Patrol Assist Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out

APPENDIX A MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE
Jun 12th, 2025 TRV Patrol Assist Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Jun 12th, 2025 TAG SWAT Sprinter Van Patrol Assist Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Jun 12th, 2025 Flashbang Patrol Assist Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Jun 12th, 2025 9 Bang Flashbang Patrol Assist Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Jun 12th, 2025 CS Irritant Smoke Patrol Assist Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Jun 12th, 2025 40MM Baton Extended Patrol Assist Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Jun 12th, 2025 Robot Patrol Assist Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Jun 15th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jun 16th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jun 17th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jun 20th, 2025 Avata 2 UAS - Patrol Assist
Jun 22nd, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jun 22nd, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jun 22nd, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jun 22nd, 2025 Avata 2 UAS - Patrol Assist
Jun 24th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jun 25th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist

APPENDIX A MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE
Jun 26th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jun 30th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jul 2nd, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jul 4th, 2025 Mobile Command Post Traffic Control 4th of July Fireworks Jul 9th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jul 10th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jul 12th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jul 13th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jul 15th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jul 15th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jul 15th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jul 15th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jul 15th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jul 15th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jul 15th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jul 15th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jul 16th, 2025 ICOR Robot Patrol Assist suspicious package

APPENDIX A MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE
Jul 18th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jul 18th, 2025 Avata 2 UAS - Patrol Assist
Jul 18th, 2025 Mobile Command Post DUI Enforcement OTS
Jul 19th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jul 20th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jul 21st, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jul 21st, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jul 21st, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jul 21st, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jul 21st, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jul 21st, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jul 21st, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jul 21st, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jul 21st, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jul 22nd, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jul 23rd, 2025 Avata 2 UAS - Patrol Assist
Jul 27th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist

APPENDIX A MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE
Jul 28th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jul 30th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jul 31st, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Jul 31st, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Aug 1st, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Aug 4th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Aug 7th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Aug 10th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Aug 11th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Aug 12th, 2025 Avata 2 UAS - Patrol Assist
Aug 17th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Aug 18th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Aug 19th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Aug 20th, 2025 Avata 2 UAS - Patrol Assist
Aug 21st, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Aug 24th, 2025 Avata 2 UAS - Patrol Assist
Aug 27th, 2025 Bearcat Dignitary Protection Detail

APPENDIX A MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE
Aug 29th, 2025 Mobile Command Post DUI Enforcement OTS
Sep 9th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Sep 13th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Sep 14th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Sep 16th, 2025 Bearcat Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Sep 16th, 2025 TRV Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Sep 16th, 2025 TAG SWAT Sprinter Van Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Sep 16th, 2025 Bearcat Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Sep 16th, 2025 TRV Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Sep 16th, 2025 TAG SWAT Sprinter Van Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Sep 19th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Sep 20th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Sep 20th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Sep 20th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Sep 22nd, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Sep 24th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Sep 25th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist

APPENDIX A MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE
Sep 27th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Sep 28th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Sep 28th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Sep 28th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Sep 29th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Sep 30th, 2025 Mobile Command Post CalAPCO Display
Oct 12th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Oct 16th, 2025 Bearcat Patrol Assist Search Warrant SWAT call-out Oct 16th, 2025 TRV Patrol Assist Search Warrant SWAT call-out Oct 16th, 2025 TAG SWAT Sprinter Van Patrol Assist Search Warrant SWAT call-out Oct 16th, 2025 Flashbang Patrol Assist Search Warrant SWAT call-out Oct 16th, 2025 40 MM Baton Extended Patrol Assist Search Warrant SWAT call-out Nov 5th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Nov 5th, 2025 Bearcat Patrol Assist SWAT call-out for 459 PC Suspect Nov 5th, 2025 TRV Patrol Assist SWAT call-out for 459 PC Suspect Nov 5th, 2025 TAG SWAT Sprinter Van Patrol Assist SWAT call-out for 459 PC Suspect Nov 6th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist

APPENDIX A MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE
Nov 10th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Nov 11th, 2025 Avata 2 UAS - Patrol Assist
Nov 11th, 2025 Avata 2 UAS - Patrol Assist
Nov 11th, 2025 Bearcat Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Nov 11th, 2025 TRV Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Nov 11th, 2025 TAG SWAT Sprinter Van Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Nov 11th, 2025 Flashbang Patrol Assist Search/Arrest Warrant SWAT call-out Nov 14th, 2025 Bearcat Patrol Assist Search Warrant SWAT call-out Nov 14th, 2025 TRV Patrol Assist Search Warrant SWAT call-out Nov 14th, 2025 TAG SWAT Sprinter Van Patrol Assist Search Warrant SWAT call-out Nov 14th, 2025 Bearcat Patrol Assist Search Warrant SWAT call-out Nov 14th, 2025 TRV Patrol Assist Search Warrant SWAT call-out Nov 14th, 2025 TAG SWAT Sprinter Van Patrol Assist Search Warrant SWAT call-out Nov 14th, 2025 Flashbang Patrol Assist Search Warrant SWAT call-out Nov 16th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Nov 25th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Nov 25th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist

APPENDIX A MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE
Nov 28th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Nov 29th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Nov 29th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Nov 30th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Nov 30th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Nov 30th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Nov 30th, 2025 Avata 2 UAS - Patrol Assist
Dec 4th, 2025 Avata 2 UAS - Patrol Assist
Dec 5th, 2025 Mobile Command Post Operation Grinch Holiday Enforcement Dec 7th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Dec 7th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Dec 10th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Dec 12th, 2025 Mavic 3 Thermal UAS - Patrol Assist
Dec 22nd, 2025 Mobile Command Post Homicide Investigation

APPENDIX B MILITARY EQUIPMENT LIST

DESCRIPTION
(Military item)

QUANTITY
(sought or
possessed)

CAPABILITIES EXPECTED

LIFESPAN

PRODUCT

DESCRIPTION
(MANUFACTURER)

PURPOSE
(AUTHORIZED USE)
FISCAL
IMPACT
(INITIAL AND

YEARLY COST)
LEGAL
RULES

TRAINING
(CA POST OR
OTHER)

COMPLIANCE
(OVERSIGHT)

COMPLAINT

PROCEDURE
TRV 1 Armored
Transportation
Less than
20 years
LENCO Armored
Vehicles
Transportation
and Ballistic
Protection
Initial:
$383,692
Yearly: $1K
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
1009
Roseville Policy
1009
Bearcat 1 Armored
Transportation
Less than
20 years
LENCO Armored
Vehicles
Transportation
and Ballistic
Protection
Initial:
$369,911
Yearly: $1K
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
1009
Roseville Policy
1009

TAG SWAT
Sprinter Van
1 Armored
Transportation
Less than
20 years
TAG Transportation
and Ballistic
Protection
Initial:
$210,000
Yearly: $1K
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
1009
Roseville Policy
1009
Mobile
Command Post
1 Mobile field
command and
control center
for critical
incidents
Less than
20 years
LDV Vehicles:

Command
Vehicle
Critical
investigative
and public
safety
incidents for
mobile
technology ICS
functions
Subtotal with
Tax:
$490,177.38
Yearly: $300
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent
In house
orientation
and IT
support
N/A Roseville Policy
1009
Rifles (SWAT
Issued M4’s)
20 Lethal Force 15,000
Rounds
Colt Arms Lethal Force Initial: $2k
each
Yearly: $200
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
Shotguns
(SWAT Issued)
1 Less Lethal
(Orange), 1
Breaching
Less than
Lethal/Lethal
Force
30,000
Rounds
Remington 870 Less Lethal
Force
Compliance/En
try
Breaching/Leth
al Force
Initial: $400.

Yearly: $0.00
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Breaching
School/ CA
POST
Certified
Extended
Range
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009

APPENDIX B MILITARY EQUIPMENT LIST
Projectile
Munitions
(4hrs)
40 MM 2 Less than Lethal
Force
10,000
Rounds
LMT Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: $1000
each
Yearly: $0.00
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Certified
Extended
Range
Projectile
Munitions
(4hrs)
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
40 MM Baton
Round
52 Less than Lethal
Force
10 years Defense
Technologies
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: $20 ea.

Yearly: $500
max
depending on
dispersion.
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Certified
Extended
Range
Projectile
Munitions
(4hrs)
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
40 MM Baton
Extended
73 Less than Lethal
Force
10 years Defense
Technologies
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: $20 ea.

Yearly: $500.
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Certified
Extended
Range
Projectile
Munitions
(4hrs)
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
40 MM OC
Round
15 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years Defense
Technologies
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: $20 ea.

Yearly: $100.
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Certified
Extended
Range
Projectile
Munitions
(4hrs)
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
40 MM CS
Barricade 4330
59 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years CTS Combined
Tactical
Solution’s
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: $22 ea.

Yearly: $100.
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
Blank Shell Gas 25 Propel
Chemical
Agents
10 years CTS Combined
Tactical
Solution’s
Used to propel
chemical
agents from
Gas Launcher
Cup
Initial: $50
Yearly:

Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
Shotgun Bean
Bag Round
6 Less than Lethal
Force
10 years Defense
Technologies
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: $5.
each
Yearly: $0.00
835a PC &
Federal
and State

CA POST
Certified
Extended
Range
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Roseville Policy
1009

APPENDIX B MILITARY EQUIPMENT LIST
Dispersion
dependent
case
precedent
Projectile
Munitions
(4hrs)
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Gas Launcher
Cup Attachment
3 Launch
Chemical
Agents
Unknown CTS Combined
Tactical
Solution’s
Used to propel
chemical
agents from
Gas Launcher
Cup
Initial: $260
ea.

Yearly: $0.00
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
Gas Spike 1 Introducing
Chemical
Agents
Unknown Tomahawk
Tactical
Introducing
Chemical
Agents into
structure
remotely
Initial: $4K
Yearly: $0
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
Flashbang 9 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years Defense
Technology
Light Sound
Diversionary
Device
Initial:

Yearly:

Rocklin PD
assumed cost
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
9 Bang
Flashbang
0 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years Defense
Technology
Light Sound
Diversionary
Device
Initial:

Yearly:

Rocklin PD
assumed cost
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
Bang Pole 1 Introduce
LSDD’s
Unknown Thunderstick
American
Tactical Entry
Accessories MFG
Introducing
LSDD’s into
specific area
remotely
Initial: $500
Yearly: $0
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
MP5-SD 1 Lethal Force 15,000
Rounds
Heckler Koch
(HK)
Lethal Force Initial: $1,200
Yearly: $0
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
Jet Smoke 5210
JL
13 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years CTS Combined
Tactical
Solution’s
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: $34 ea
Yearly: $0
Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009

APPENDIX B MILITARY EQUIPMENT LIST
Baffled Smoke
5210
5 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years CTS Combined
Tactical
Solution’s
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: $35 ea
Yearly: $0
Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
Baffled CS 5230 25 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years CTS Combined
Tactical
Solution’s
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: $28 ea
Yearly: $0
Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
Unbaffled CS
5230
15 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years CTS Combined
Tactical
Solution’s
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: $28 ea
Yearly: $0
Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
Aerosol OC CS
6343
17 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years CTS Combined
Tactical
Solution’s
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: $36 ea
Yearly: $0
Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
TRI Chambers 7 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years DEF Tech Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: Rocklin
assumed cost
Yearly:

Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
CS 8230 Tactical
Grenade Smoke
7 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years CTS Combined
Tactical
Solution’s
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: Rocklin
assumed cost
Yearly:

Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
Muzzle Bangs 50 Less than Lethal
Force
10 years CTS Combined
Tactical
Solution’s
Light Sound
Diversionary
Device
Initial: $7 ea
Yearly:

Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
Breaching Shells 27 Black
Caps, 32
Green Caps
Breaching
Barricaded
Entry/Lethal
Force
10 years Royal Arms Bolt/Hinge
Removal for
entry into
structures
Initial:$20 ea.
box
Yearly:

Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Breaching
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Roseville Policy
1009

APPENDIX B MILITARY EQUIPMENT LIST
Investigation -
Policy 1009
4210 40 MM
White SMOKE
2 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years CTS Combined
Tactical
Solution’s
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial:$50
Yearly:

Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
CS Irritant
Smoke
4 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years Sage Control
Ordinance
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: $50
Yearly:

Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
Sniper Rifles 4 Lethal Force 10,000
Rounds
Kimber 308 Lethal
Force/Over
Watch
Initial:$3K ea.

Yearly: $100
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Sniper
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
Inline Night
Vision (Sniper)
2 Night Vision Unknown Knight Force Rifle Mounted
Night Vision
Initial: $5K
Yearly: $0
Grant funded
OES
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Sniper
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
Infrared Laser
Light
12 Night Vision
Illuminator
Unknown Steiner Rifle Mounted
Night Vision
Initial: $5K
Yearly: $0
Grant funded
OES
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Sniper
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
Night Vision
Goggles
w/Weapon
Mounted
8 Night Vision Unknown PVS-14 Gen III
WP
Helmet
Mounted Night
Vision
Initial: 5K ea.

Yearly: $0
Grant funded
OES
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
Rifle Mounted
Monocular
2 Night Vision Unknown SIMRAD
Optronics
Rifle Mounted
Night Vision
Initial: $5K
Yearly: 0$
Grant funded
OES
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
Night Vision
Monocular
1 Night Vision Unknown NAIT Handheld
Night Vision
Initial:$2K 835a PC &
Federal
and State

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Roseville Policy
1009

APPENDIX B MILITARY EQUIPMENT LIST
Yearly: $0
Grant funded
OES
case
precedent
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Red Dot Sight
Apertures
16 Sight Alignment 10 years EO Tech Illuminated
Sight
Alignment
Initial:$300
Yearly:$0
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
Night Vision
Goggles
1 Night Vision Unknown Armasight NVG Head Mounted
Night Vision
Initial:$2K
Yearly:$0
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
Pole Camera 1 Video Images
from Remote
Location
Unknown CORE Tactical
Electronics
Real Time
Video Display
from under
closed door or
unreachable
location
Initial: $700
Yearly: $0
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
Robot
(Throwbot)
1 Video Images
from Remote
Location
4-5 years RECON Robotics Remote
Control
Maneuverabilit
y with Real
Time Video
Display
Initial: $6,000
Yearly: $0
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
Robot
(Tracked and
wheeled)
3 Video Images
from Remote
Location
4-5 years SuperDroid Remote
Control
Maneuverabilit
y with Real
Time Video
Display
Initial:
$15,000
Yearly: $0
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
Magnifiers 15 Magnification
of Sight
Aperture
10 years EO Tech Sight
Magnification
Initial: $400
Yearly: $0
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
Magnifiers
(Snipers)
4 Magnification
of Sight
Aperture
10 Years Sig Sauer Tango

MSR LPVO
Sight
Magnification
Initial:$400
Yearly:$0
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009

APPENDIX B MILITARY EQUIPMENT LIST
Suppressors
(Snipers)
4 Noise
Suppression
10,000
Rounds
SureFire Noise
Suppression
Initial:$975
Yearly:$0
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
Suppressors
(Entry)
16 Noise
Suppression
10,000
Rounds
HUXWRK Noise
Suppression
Initial: $975
Yearly: $0
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
Patrol Red Dot
Optics
130 Rifle Sight. Non
magnified
10 years Aimpoint Rifle Sight $30 year/
batteries
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent
1 hour for
Zero.

After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
Pepperball
Launcher
8 Less Lethal
force option
10 years Pepperball Inc Less Lethal
force option
Initial: entire
system $700
No annual
fee.
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent
1 hour InHouse TrngAfter Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
Pepperball
Munitions
1000 Less Lethal
force option
10 years Pepperball Inc Less Lethal
force option
$1000 year
for inert
rounds.
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent
1 hours InHouse TrngAfter Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
40mm Launcher 45 (+2 more
in SWAT)
Less Lethal
force
20 years LMT Less Lethal
force
$1000 year/
training
rounds
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent
(4) hour
POST
Certified
course
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
40mm MultiLauncher 3 Less Lethal
force
20 years Milox Less Lethal
force
Initial $3600/
training
rounds
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent
(4) hour
POST
Certified
course
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
40mm munition 300 Less Lethal Blue
Sponge Round
munition
5 years Def Tech Less Lethal
force
$0-$1500
year
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent
(4)hours
POST
Certified
Course
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Roseville Policy
1009

APPENDIX B MILITARY EQUIPMENT LIST
Investigation -
Policy 1009
40mm munition 50 Less Lethal
Orange OC
munition
5 years Def Tech Less Lethal
force
$0-$1000 per
year.
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent
(4)hour POST
Certified
course
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
Bean Bag
Launcher
65 Less Lethal
force
30 years Remington Less Lethal
force
$0 annually.

Being phased
out.
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent
(4)hour POST
Certified
Course
Being Phased out
of dept use.

Roseville Policy
1009
Bean Bag
Munitions
400 Less Lethal
force munition
10 years Def Tech Less Lethal
force
$0 annually.

Being phased
out.
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent
(4)hours
POST course
Being Phased out
of dept use.

Roseville Policy
1009
Kinetic
Breaching Tool
1 Breaching
Barricaded
Entry
10 years Kinetic Breaching Forced Entry
Tool
Initial: $0
Yearly:

Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Breaching
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009

UAS SECTION
DJI Mavic 3T 4 UAS-Remote
Piloted
2-5 years DJI See attached
RPD Policy
7300 initial /
400-600 per
year battery
maintenance
FAA
Requirem
ents and
Regulation
s.

FAA Part
107, RPD
monthly
training/skill
s
Sergeant and Lt
oversight of the
team
Professional
Standards Unit
Roseville Policy
1009
DJI Matrice 4TD 2 UAS – Remote
Piloted
2-5 years DJI See attached
RPD Policy
9850 initial /
1000-1500
per year
battery
maintenance
FAA
Requirem
ents and
Regulation
s.

FAA Part
107, RPD
monthly
training/skill
s
Sergeant and Lt
oversight of the
team
Professional
Standards Unit
Roseville Policy
1009
DJI Avata 2 4 UAS – Remote
Piloted
2-5 years DJI See attached
RPD Policy
1350 initial /
200-300 per
year battery
maintenance
FAA
Requirem
ents and
Regulation
s.

FAA Part
107, RPD
monthly
training/skill
s
Sergeant and Lt
oversight of the
team
Professional
Standards Unit
Roseville Policy
1009
PAN Disruptor 4 General
disruption tool
At end of
lifespan
Ideal
Explosives/Carbo
n Fire
See attached
RPD Policy
$5000 per
unit/ No
annual cost
FBI
Requirem
ents and
Regulation
s
FBI
Hazardous
Devices
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009

APPENDIX B MILITARY EQUIPMENT LIST
PAN Rounds 96 Rounds General
disruption tool
Consumabl
e
Carbon Fire See attached
RPD Policy
Part of a
$5500 annual
consumable
budget
FBI
Requirem
ents and
Regulation
s
FBI
Hazardous
Devices
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
High Explosives 130 LBS Used in general
disruption
tools, render
safe, and
counter
charging
Consumabl
e
Alpha Explosives See attached
RPD Policy
Part of a
$5500 annual
consumable
budget
FBI
Requirem
ents and
Regulation
s
FBI
Hazardous
Devices
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
ICOR Robot 1 Remote piloted At end of
lifespan
ICOR See attached
RPD Policy
$75000/ Part
of a $1500
annual
maintenance
budget
FBI
Requirem
ents and
Regulation
s
FBI
Hazardous
Devices
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
Remotec Robot 1 Remote piloted At end of
lifespan
ANDROS See attached
RPD Policy
10-33
program/
Part of a
$1500 annual
maintenance
budget
FBI
Requirem
ents and
Regulation
s
FBI
Hazardous
Devices
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009
Allen Vanguard
Robot
1 Remote piloted At end of
lifespan
54 KG See attached
RPD Policy
$125000/
Part of a
$1500 annual
maintenance
budget
FBI
Requirem
ents and
Regulation
s
FBI
Hazardous
Devices
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1009
Roseville Policy
1009

Policy
706
Roseville Police Department

POLICY MANUAL
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2025/02/07, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Roseville Police Department Military Equipment - 1
Military Equipment
706.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for the approval, acquisition, use, collaborating in the use, and reporting requirements of military equipment (Government Code § 7070; Government Code § 7071; Government Code § 7072).
706.1.1 DEFINITIONS
Definitions related to this policy include (Government Code § 7070):

Governing body – The elected or appointed body that oversees the Roseville Police Department.

Military equipment – Includes but is not limited to the following:
• Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles. • Mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) vehicles or armored personnel carriers. • High mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV), two-and-one-half-ton trucks, five-ton trucks, or wheeled vehicles that have a breaching or entry apparatus attached. • Tracked armored vehicles that provide ballistic protection to their occupants. • Command and control vehicles that are either built or modified to facilitate the operational control and direction of public safety units. • Weaponized aircraft, vessels, or vehicles of any kind. • Battering rams, slugs, and breaching apparatuses that are explosive in nature. This does not include a handheld, one-person ram.
• Firearms and ammunition of_.50 caliber or greater, excluding standard-issue shotguns and standard-issue shotgun ammunition.
• Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than_.50 caliber, including firearms and accessories identified as assault weapons in Penal Code § 30510 and Penal Code § 30515, with the exception of standard-issue firearms and standard-issue ammunition. • Any firearm or firearm accessory that is designed to launch explosive projectiles. • Noise-flash diversionary devices and explosive breaching tools. • Munitions containing tear gas or OC, excluding standard, service-issued handheld pepper spray.
• TASER® Shockwave, microwave weapons, water cannons, and long-range acoustic devices (LRADs).
• Kinetic energy weapons and munitions.
• Any other equipment as determined by a governing body or a state agency to require additional oversight.

Roseville Police Department

POLICY MANUAL
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2025/02/07, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Roseville Police Department Military Equipment - 2
706.2 POLICY
It is the policy of the Roseville Police Department that members of this department comply with the provisions of Government Code § 7071 with respect to military equipment. 706.3 MILITARY EQUIPMENT COORDINATOR
The Chief of Police should designate a member of this department to act as the military equipment coordinator. The responsibilities of the military equipment coordinator include but are not limited to:
(a) Acting as liaison to the governing body for matters related to the requirements of this policy.
(b) Identifying department equipment that qualifies as military equipment in the current possession of the Department, or the equipment the Department intends to acquire that requires approval by the governing body.
(c) Conducting an inventory of all military equipment at least annually. (d) Collaborating with any allied agency that may use military equipment within the jurisdiction of the Roseville Police Department (Government Code § 7071). (e) Preparing for, scheduling, and coordinating the annual community engagement meeting to include:

1. Publicizing the details of the meeting.

2. Preparing for public questions regarding the department’s funding, acquisition, and use of equipment.
(f) Preparing the annual military equipment report for submission to the Chief of Police and ensuring that the report is made available on the department website (Government Code § 7072).
(g) Establishing the procedure for a person to register a complaint or concern, or how that person may submit a question about the use of a type of military equipment, and how the Department will respond in a timely manner.
706.4 MILITARY EQUIPMENT INVENTORY
The following constitutes a list of qualifying equipment for the Department:

See attachment: Military Equipment 2025.pdf
706.5 APPROVAL
The Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall obtain approval from the governing body by way of an ordinance adopting the military equipment policy. As part of the approval process, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall ensure the proposed military equipment policy is submitted to the governing body and is available on the department website at least 30 days prior to any public hearing concerning the military equipment at issue (Government Code § 7071). The military equipment policy must be approved by the governing body prior to engaging in any of the following (Government Code § 7071):

Roseville Police Department

POLICY MANUAL
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2025/02/07, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Roseville Police Department Military Equipment - 3
(a) Requesting military equipment made available pursuant to 10 USC § 2576a. (b) Seeking funds for military equipment, including but not limited to applying for a grant, soliciting or accepting private, local, state, or federal funds, in-kind donations, or other donations or transfers.
(c) Acquiring military equipment either permanently or temporarily, including by borrowing or leasing.
(d) Collaborating with another law enforcement agency in the deployment or other use of military equipment within the jurisdiction of this department. (e) Using any new or existing military equipment for a purpose, in a manner, or by a person not previously approved by the governing body.
(f) Soliciting or responding to a proposal for, or entering into an agreement with, any other person or entity to seek funds for, apply to receive, acquire, use, or collaborate in the use of military equipment.
(g) Acquiring military equipment through any means not provided above. 706.6 COORDINATION WITH OTHER JURISDICTIONS
Military equipment should not be used by any other law enforcement agency or member in this jurisdiction unless the military equipment is approved for use in accordance with this policy.The Department should not use military equipment belonging to any other law enforcement agency unless the military equipment is approved for use in that jurisdiction.

Military equipment use and acquisition is often a collaboration with the City of Rocklin and the Rocklin Police Department due to our regional SWAT and EOD teams. 706.7 ANNUAL REPORT
Upon approval of a military equipment policy, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee should submit a military equipment report to the governing body for each type of military equipment approved within one year of approval, and annually thereafter for as long as the military equipment is available for use (Government Code § 7072).

The Chief of Police or the authorized designee should also make each annual military equipment report publicly available on the department website for as long as the military equipment is available for use. The report shall include all information required by Government Code § 7072 for the preceding calendar year for each type of military equipment in department inventory. 706.8 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Within 30 days of submitting and publicly releasing the annual report, the Department shall hold at least one well-publicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting, at which the Department should discuss the report and respond to public questions regarding the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment.

Roseville Police Department

POLICY MANUAL
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2025/02/07, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Roseville Police Department Military Equipment - 4
706.9 COMPLAINT PROCEDURE
All complaints or concerns regarding this policy will be handled pursuant to the Department's normal complaint process.

2/7/23, 4:08 PM Print Document
https://ecm-web-prd.roseville.ca.us/OnBaseProdIDPEP4/PrintHandler.ashx 1/2

2/7/23, 4:08 PM Print Document
https://ecm-web-prd.roseville.ca.us/OnBaseProdIDPEP4/PrintHandler.ashx 2/2

Communication
Meeting Date: 3/4/2026
Item #: VII.5
File #: 0400-04-17-1
Item ID: 2026-84
Title: Infill PCL 13 1028 Main Street Subdivision Project — Notice of Completion Contact: Jeremy Knuthson 916-774-5252 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of the Notice of Completion for the Infill PCL 13 1028 Main Street Subdivision Project as complete. The Engineering Division has made a final inspection of the project and has found the roadway infrastructure work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications.

This action has no impact to the City's General Fund. Construction costs were paid by the developer.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting Infill PCL 13 1028 Main Street Subdivision Project as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Notice of Completion.

BACKGROUND
The Engineering Division has made a final inspection of the above project and has found the roadway infrastructure work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications.

FISCAL IMPACT
The actions requested as part of this action have no impact to the City's General Fund. Construction costs were paid by the developer.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The Notice of Completion meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth
Respectfully Submitted,
Jeremy Knuthson, Construction Inspector
Mike Isom, Development Services Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 26-042

2. Notice of Completion

3. Vicinity Map

4. Final Map
REVIEWERS:

Jeremy Knuthson, Development Services Department - Engineering Division Created/Initiated - 2/11/2026 Marc Stout, Development Services Department - Engineering Division Approved - 2/11/2026 Mike Isom, Development Services Department Approved - 2/11/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 2/17/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 2/17/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 2/17/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 2/17/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 2/18/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 2/18/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 2/18/2026

RESOLUTION NO. 26-042

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS INFILL PCL 13 1028 MAIN STREET SUBDIVISION PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING

THE CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF

ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND ACCEPTING ALL DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION.

BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

1. The "Notice of Completion" on file in the City Clerk's Department relative to that public work known as the Infill PCL 13 1028 Main Street Subdivision Project is hereby approved and the public work accepted.

2. All of the right-of-way and easements offered for dedication on the final map of Infill PCL 13 1028 Main Street Subdivision Project recorded in Book GG of Maps, Page 91, in the office of the recorder of Placer County, is hereby accepted by the City in part as said dedications relates to the improvement plan set known as Infill PCL 13 1028 Main Street Subdivision Project.

3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

CITY CLERK

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY CLERK

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the public work of improvement known as the Project was completed and
accepted by the City of Roseville on . The location is
situated in the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California and is indicated on the attached map, marked as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference. The real property herein described is owned by the City of Roseville, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville CA 95678.

The direct/general contractor on said project was .

The surety on said project was
.
___________________________________
City of Roseville
Owner
ATTEST:
________________________________ _
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk

State of California )
County of Placer )
I, , being first duly sworn, depose and say: I am the
of the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation in the State of California, owner of the property described in the above Notice. I am duly authorized to make this verification for and on behalf of the City of Roseville. I have read the Notice of Completion and know its contents and the facts stated therein are true.

___________________________________

City of Roseville
State of California )
County of Placer )
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before
me on this _____ day of ,
20___,
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) who appeared
before me.
____________________________________
Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above Signature of Notary Public A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

Exhibit A: Location Map
City of Roseville
Infill PCL 13 1028 Main Street
Subdivision Project
- �
>--------1
Project
Location ========+li==I
--- -

MAIN ST

TRUSTEE'S STATEMENT:

FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE UNDER THAT CERTAIN DEED OF TRUST DATED JUNE 14, 2024 AND RECORDED JUNE 14, 2024 AS DOCUMENT NO. 2024-00.31011

OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF PLACER COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, HEREBY CONSENTS TO THE RECORDATION OF THIS FINAL MAP.

FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY
BY: 13--�---
--=-----==---==-=
NAME: -- - - • I •
TITLE:
"B V-'(A\A. � t.v...._-. \<_
£'1<ac-u+j ,___ ✓;(...t. f r�,s;cL,� -INOTARY'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT

A NOT ARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THE

IDENTITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE IS ATTACHED, ANO NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS, ACCURACY, OR VALIDITY OF THAT DOCUMENT.

ST ATE OF CALIFORNIA(' �n A• At� .
.1
'-r1l COUNTY OF ____ -::>rvl'-t"'l"\1/l'"\- ....._ ........ _,_ .................. \ V ON q · ll ·1-4- BEFORE ME, _ N,.\N.�� , A NOTARY PUBLIC, PERSONALL y APPEARED -g,r1..y AN £;;.f:\MIL-:: 'WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON<S> WHOSE NAMECSl ARE

SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY

EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITYCIES), AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURECSl ON THE INSTRUMENT, THE PERSONS, OF THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSONCS> ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT.

I CERTIFY UNDER PENAL TY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE ST ATE OF CALIFORN THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT.

AND OFFICIAL SEAL.
' �-��

SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME
MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS 5f)cCr2}(�1V COUNTY
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: q \ \ ij'k{e MY COMMISSION NUMBER: ---11:_I � \

FINAL MAP OF
INFILL PCL 13 1028 MAIN

STREET SUBDIVISION
SUBDIVISION NUMBER PL21-0372
BEING A PORTION OF LOT 6 OF SUBDIVISION MAP
FILED IN BOOK C OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 58,

PLACER COUNTY RECORDS
LYING WITHIN PORTION OF SECTION 34,
T11 N R6E, M.D.B. & M

CITY OF ROSEVILLE,

COUNTY OF PLACER, CALIFORNIA
KASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.

SEPTEMBER 2024
SHEETS OF5
BOOK 66 OF MAPS, PAGE _9_\ _
SHEET 5 OF 5

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 3/4/2026
Item #: VII.6
File #: 0704
Item ID: 2026-96
Title: Parking Lot at the Maidu Soccer Fields — Notice of Completion Contact: Nick Bumb 916-746-1313 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of the Notice of Completion for the Parking Lot at the Maidu Soccer Fields.

The project included the construction of 84 parking spaces, including accessible spaces, and installation of two drainage facilities to support the improvements. The total cost of the construction contract with BRCO Constructors, Inc. was $633,900. The project was funded by General Fund resources.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council accept the Parking Lot at the Maidu Soccer Fields as complete and adopt a resolution authorizing the Public Works Director to execute the Notice of Completion.

BACKGROUND
Maidu Regional Park is located at 1550 Maidu Drive and is a 152-acre site that includes a community center, library, sports courts area, four softball fields, five soccer fields, a looped trail system and a maintenance yard. The Maidu Museum and Historical Site is also located at Maidu Regional Park. This park was built in phases with the earliest construction beginning in 1987. The park’s layout includes a circular parking lot that encompasses the softball fields set in a “wagon-wheel” configuration, including a portion that was still gravel. With increasing use of the soccer fields, it was determined that the gravel parking lot in front of the fields should be paved.

The project completed the paving of the parking lot which provided 84 total spaces for cars parking near the soccer fields and overflow for park users visiting other park facilities. In addition to paving the existing gravel parking lot, the project installed two drainage facilities to support the newly paved parking lot.

Public Works Engineering Division Staff completed the final inspection of the Parking Lot at the Maidu Soccer Fields and have found the work to be completed in accordance with the improvement plans and specifications. The project is now ready for acceptance. As required by the specifications, the contractor will guarantee the installation and improvements for a period of 12 months from the date of Notice of Completion.

FISCAL IMPACT
The project was awarded at the October 1, 2025 City Council meeting for a contract amount of $577,145.00 and a construction change order authority of 10% ($57,714.50). The final contract amount is $633,884.20 which exceeded the original contract amount by 9.83% ($56,739.20) and is within the approved contingency. The increase was a result of adjustments in actual quantities of the construction bid items and contract change orders based on unknown field and underground conditions. The project was funded by General Fund resources.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The Notice of Completion meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth
Respectfully Submitted,
Nick Bumb, Associate Engineer
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 26-044

2. Notice of Completion

3. Location Map
REVIEWERS:

Nick Bumb, Public Works Department - Engineering - City Project's Created/Initiated - 2/5/2026 Jesse Khatkar, Public Works Department - Engineering - City Project's Approved - 2/11/2026 Noah Siviglia, Public Works Department - Engineering - City Project's Approved - 2/11/2026 Stefanie Kemen, Public Works Department - Administration Division Approved - 2/11/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 2/17/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 2/17/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 2/17/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 2/17/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 2/18/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 2/18/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 2/19/2026

RESOLUTION NO. 26-044

ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS PARKING LOT AT THE MAIDU SOCCER FIELDS, APPROVING THE “NOTICE OF COMPLETION”, AND AUTHORIZING THE

PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

1. The “Notice of Completion” on file in the City Clerk’s Department relative to that public work known as the Parking Lot at the Maidu Soccer Fields, has been approved and the public work accepted.

2. The Public Works Director is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ____ day of _____________________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY CLERK

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383

NOTICE OF COMPLETION

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the public work of improvement known as the Project was completed and
accepted by the City of Roseville on . The location is
situated in the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California and is indicated on the attached map, marked as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference. The real property herein described is owned by the City of Roseville, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville CA 95678.

The direct/general contractor on said project was .

The surety on said project was
.
___________________________________

City of Roseville
Owner
ATTEST:
________________________________ _
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk

State of California )
County of Placer )
I, , being first duly sworn, depose and say: I am the
of the City of Roseville, a municipal
corporation in the State of California, owner of the property described in the above Notice. I am duly authorized to make this verification for and on behalf of the City of Roseville. I have read the Notice of Completion and know its contents and the facts stated therein are true. ___________________________________
City of Roseville
State of California )
County of Placer )
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before
me on this _____ day of ,
20___,
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) who appeared
before me.
____________________________________
Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above Signature of Notary Public A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

�j ROsE'VILLE

CALIF ORNIA
Public Works

CIRBYWAY

PARKING LOT AT THE MAIDU

SOCCER FIELDS

LOCATION MAP
c:::
0 w 1------L-----'--____.__-
(!)
0 c:::
>-
l)
0 c:::

PROJECT

LOCATION
MAIDU
PARK
EXHIBIT "A"

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 3/4/2026
Item #: VII.7
File #: 0800-04 & 0214
Item ID: 2026-14
Title: Federal Emergency Management Agency Fiscal Year 2025 Hazard Mitigation Grant Program – Application
Contact: Brian Walker 916-746-1349 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends authorization to submit a grant application to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) through the California Office of Emergency Services (CalOES) for the Fiscal Year 2025 Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute all related forms and agreements on behalf of the City. If awarded, funds would be applied to the Pleasant Grove Stormwater Retention Basin Project. The project is funded by the Pleasant Grove/Curry Creek Watershed Drainage Mitigation Fee Fund. No General Fund resources are included for this project.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Adopt a resolution authorizing the Authorized Agent to submit a Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Application to the California Office of Emergency Services (CalOES) for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Fiscal Year 2025 Hazard Mitigation Grant Program;

2. Renew the designation of the Assistant City Manager and the Public Works Director as the City of Roseville Authorized Agents to the California Office of Emergency Services for all matters pertaining to obtaining federal financial assistance and State disaster assistance;

3. Authorize the Authorized Agent to execute all related forms and agreements to comply with all grant terms and conditions;

4. Direct staff to seek additional grant funding sources for the Pleasant Grove Stormwater Retention Basin Project.

BACKGROUND
Since 1990, the City has recognized the need for a stormwater facility to mitigate increased stormwater runoff volume resulting from new development in Roseville within the Pleasant Grove Creek watershed. In 1991, the City Council adopted the Pleasant Grove Watershed Drainage Mitigation Fee to begin collecting fees to be used for a city-wide solution within the watershed that would address potential downstream flood impacts.

The proposed Pleasant Grove Stormwater Retention Basin (PGSRB) facility is located adjacent to the Reason Farms Preserve, covering approximately 1,050 acres north of Phillip Road, extending to the northern and western City boundaries. Proposed improvements are anticipated to include an off-channel retention basin on the south side of Pleasant Grove Creek which would be fed by the existing Pleasant Grove Creek Bypass Channel east of Westbrook Blvd. Additional project features are being considered that would straddle University Creek. The retention basin facility is anticipated to meet the stormwater volume mitigation needs of current and future planned developments within the City’s Pleasant Grove and

Curry Creek watersheds. The project is also envisioned to provide enhanced riparian, wetland, and upland habitats, and passive recreation (e.g., pedestrian and bicycle trails).

Although the project is anticipated to be completely developer-funded through the mitigation fee program, the award of grant funding would accelerate the timeline to construction of the project and deliver the required mitigation much sooner than relying upon impact fees alone.

California Governor's Office of Emergency Services (CalOES) has released a Notification of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) for FEMA’s Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (DR-4856). The grant program is competitive at a state level, and provides funding for projects that reduce or eliminate the risk of repetitive flood damage to buildings and structures insured under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).

Staff believes the PGSRB Project will compete for this funding, given the nature of the work being performed, and requests the Council’s authorization to apply for these funds.

In order for the City to obtain federal financial assistance under Public Law 93-288 as amended by the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act of 1988, and/or state financial assistance under the California Disaster Assistance Act, the City must keep a resolution on file with CalOES designating an Authorized Agent or Agents to act on behalf of the City for a period of three years. At their March 3, 2021 meeting, the City Council designated the Assistant City Manager and the Public Works Director as the City of Roseville’s Authorized Agents for correspondence regarding grant applications and acceptance of funds from these organizations for the City Roseville. The new designation will expire after a period of three years from the date of approval.

FISCAL IMPACT
The project is currently in design and estimated to cost approximately $65 million and is funded by developer-paid Pleasant Grove/Curry Creek Watershed Drainage Mitigation Fee Funds. If the project is awarded the Hazard Mitigation Grant, the City would receive $18 million to help accelerate the project timeline. No General Fund resources are included in this project.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The submission of a grant application and designation of Authorized Agents to CalOES for all matters pertaining to State disaster assistance meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community

2. Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world

4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth
Respectfully Submitted,
Brian Walker, Senior Engineer

Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 26-046

2. Application
REVIEWERS:

Joseph Anderson, Public Works Department – Engineering – Floodplain Management
Created/Initiated -
1/13/2026
Brian Walker, City Clerk Department Approved - 2/11/2026 Noah Siviglia, Public Works Department - Engineering - City Project's Approved - 2/11/2026 Stefanie Kemen, Public Works Department - Administration Division Approved - 2/11/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 2/17/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 2/18/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 2/19/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 2/19/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 2/19/2026 Dominick Casey, City Clerk Department Approved - 2/23/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 2/23/2026

RESOLUTION NO. 26-046

APPROVING A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF EMERGENCY

SERVICES FOR THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FISCAL YEAR 2025 HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAM, AND AUTHORIZING THE

ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER OR PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE ALL

RELATED FORMS AND AGREEMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE WHEREAS, since 1990, the City has recognized the need for a stormwater facility to mitigate increased stormwater runoff volume resulting from new development in Roseville within the Pleasant Grove Creek watershed; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Pleasant Grove Stormwater Retention Basin (PGSRB) facility is anticipated to include an off-channel retention basin that would meet the stormwater volume mitigation needs of current and future planned developments within the City’s Pleasant Grove and Curry Creek watersheds; and
WHEREAS, even though the project is anticipated to be completely developer-funded through the mitigation fee program, an award of grant funding would accelerate the timeline to construct the project and deliver the required mitigation much sooner than relying upon impact fees alone; and
WHEREAS, the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services (CalOES) has released a Notification of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Fiscal Year 2025 Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (DR-4856); and WHEREAS, the grant program is competitive at a State level, and provides funding for projects that reduce or eliminate the risk of repetitive flood damage to buildings and structures insured under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP); and WHEREAS, staff believes the PGSRB Project will compete for this funding, given the nature of the work being performed, and requests the Council’s authorization to apply for these funds.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Roseville hereby authorizes staff to submit a grant application to the California Office of Emergency Services for the Federal Emergency Management Agency grant funding for the Pleasant Grove Stormwater Retention Basin Project.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Assistant City Manager and Public Works Director are hereby designated as Authorized Agents to the California Office of Emergency Services for all matters pertaining to obtaining federal financial assistant and State disaster assistance and are authorized to execute all related forms and agreements to comply with all grant terms and conditions.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution is effective upon execution by the Mayor and City Clerk and shall remain in effect for a period of three (3) years.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of __________________________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_____________________
City Clerk

DESIGNATION OF APPLICANT'S AGENT RESOLUTION FOR NON-STATE AGENCIES

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE OF THE
(Governing Body) (Name of Applicant)

THAT , OR
(Title of Authorized Agent)
, OR
(Title of Authorized Agent)
(Title of Authorized Agent)
is hereby authorized to execute for and on behalf of the , (Name of Applicant)
a public entity established under the laws of the State of California, this application and to file it with the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services for the purpose of obtaining federal financial assistance for any existing or future grant program, including, but not limited to any of the following:
- Federally declared Disaster (DR), Fire Mitigation Assistance Grant (FMAG), California State Only Disaster (CDAA), Immediate Services Program (ISP), Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP), Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC), Legislative Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program (LPDM), under - Public Law 93-288 as amended by the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act of 1988, and/or state financial assistance under the California Disaster Assistance Act.
- Flood Mitigation Assistance Program (FMA), under Section 1366 of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968.
- National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP) 42 U.S. Code 7704 (b) ((2) (A) (ix) and 42 U.S. Code 7704 (b) (2) (B) National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program, and also The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018, Div. F, Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-141 - California Early Earthquake Warning (CEEW) under CA Gov Code – Gov, Title 2, Div. 1, Chapter 7, Article 5, Sections 8587.8, 8587.11, 8587.12 That the , a public entity established under the
(Name of Applicant)
laws of the State of California, hereby authorizes its agent(s) to provide to the Governor’s Office of Emergency Services for all matters pertaining to such state disaster assistance the assurances and agreements required.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES

DESIGNATION OF APPLICANT'S AGENT RESOLUTION

NON-STATE AGENCIES
OES-FPD-130 (Rev. 10-2022)

RECOVERY DIRECTORATE

FINANCIAL PROCESSING DIVISION
Cal OES ID No: _____________
Rev. 10-2022 Page 1 of 4 OES-FPD-130

Please check the appropriate box below
This is a universal resolution and is effective for all open and future disasters/grants declared up to three (3) years following the date of approval.

This is a disaster/grant specific resolution and is effective for only disaster/grant number(s):

Passed and approved this __day of , 20
(Name and Title of Governing Body Representative)
(Name and Title of Governing Body Representative)
(Name and Title of Governing Body Representative)

CERTIFICATION
I, , duly appointed and of
(Name) (Title)
, do hereby certify that the above is a true and
(Name of Applicant)
correct copy of a resolution passed and approved by the (Governing Body)
of the on the day of , 20 .
(Name of Applicant)
(Signature) (Title)

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES

DESIGNATION OF APPLICANT'S AGENT RESOLUTION

NON-STATE AGENCIES
OES-FPD-130 (Rev. 10-2022)

RECOVERY DIRECTORATE

FINANCIAL PROCESSING DIVISION
Rev. 10-2022 Page 2 of 4 OES-FPD-130

Cal OES Form 130 Instructions
A Designation of Applicant’s Agent Resolution for Non-State Agencies is required of all Applicants to be eligible to receive funding. A new resolution must be submitted if a previously submitted resolution is older than three (3) years from the last date of approval, is invalid, or has not been submitted.

When completing the Cal OES Form 130, Applicants should fill in the blanks on pages 1 and 2. The blanks are to be filled in as follows:

Resolution Section:

Governing Body: This is the group responsible for appointing and approving the Authorized Agents.

Examples include: Board of Directors, City Council, Board of Supervisors, Board of Education, etc.

Name of Applicant: The public entity established under the laws of the State of California.

Examples include: School District, Office of Education, City, County or Non-profit agency that has applied for the grant, such as: City of San Diego, Sacramento County, Burbank Unified School District, Napa County Office of Education, University Southern California.

Authorized Agent: These are the individuals that are authorized by the Governing Body to engage with the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services regarding grants for which they have applied.

There are two ways of completing this section:

1. Titles Only: The titles of the Authorized Agents should be entered here, not their names. This allows the document to remain valid if an Authorized Agent leaves the position and is replaced by another individual. If “Titles Only” is the chosen method, this document must be accompanied by either a cover letter naming the Authorized Agents by name and title, or the Cal OES AA Names document. The supporting document can be completed by any authorized person within the Agency (e.g., administrative assistant, the Authorized Agent, secretary to the Director). It does not require the Governing Body’s signature.

2. Names and Titles: If the Governing Body so chooses, the names and titles of the Authorized Agents would be listed. A new Cal OES Form 130 will be required if any of the Authorized Agents are replaced, leave the position listed on the document, or their title changes.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES

DESIGNATION OF APPLICANT'S AGENT RESOLUTION

NON-STATE AGENCIES
OES-FPD-130 (Rev. 10-2022)

RECOVERY DIRECTORATE

FINANCIAL PROCESSING DIVISION
Rev. 10-2022 OES-FPD-130 Page 3 of 4

Checking Universal or Disaster-Specific Box: A Universal resolution is effective for all past disasters and for those declared up to three (3) years following the date of approval. Upon expiration it is no longer effective for new disasters, but it remains in effect for disasters declared prior to expiration. It remains effective until the disaster goes through closeout unless it is superseded by a newer resolution.

Governing Body Representative: These are the names and titles of the approving Board Members.

Examples include: Chairman of the Board, Director, Superintendent, etc. The names and titles cannot be one of the designated Authorized Agents. A minimum of three (3) approving board members must be listed. If less than three are present, meeting minutes must be attached in order to verify a quorum was met.

Certification Section:

Name and Title: This is the individual in attendance who recorded the creation and approval of this resolution.

Examples include: City Clerk, Secretary to the Board of Directors, County Clerk, etc. This person cannot be one of the designated Authorized Agents or Approving Board Member. If a person holds two positions (such as City Manager and Secretary to the Board) and the City Manager is to be listed as an Authorized Agent, then that person could sign the document as Secretary to the Board (not City Manager) to eliminate “Self-Certification.”

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES

DESIGNATION OF APPLICANT'S AGENT RESOLUTION

NON-STATE AGENCIES
OES-FPD-130 (Rev. 10-2022)

RECOVERY DIRECTORATE

FINANCIAL PROCESSING DIVISION
Rev. 10-2022 Page 4 of 4 OES-FPD-130

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 3/4/2026
Item #: VII.8
File #: 0721
Item ID: 2026-123
Title: Fiscal Year 2024-25 Transporation Development Act Claim Revision Contact: Kimberly Goulet 916-746-1320 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of the revised Fiscal Year 2024-25 Transportation Development Act claim in the amount of $12,563,878 for the City’s transit and transportation funding, and authorization for the City Manager or his designee to execute the claim on behalf of the City. Included in this approval is a payment of $59,547 to Placer County Transportation Planning Agency for Roseville’s share of the Funding Strategy Outreach program.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Adopt a resolution to approve the Fiscal Year (FY) 2024-25 Transportation Development Act (TDA) claim revision in the amount of $12,563,878 and authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute the claim on behalf of the City; and

2. Approve payment of FY2024-25 LTF funds to Placer County Transportation Planning Agency in the amount of $59,547 for the PCTPA Funding Strategy Outreach program.

BACKGROUND
The Placer County Transportation Planning Agency (PCTPA) has adopted the FY2024-25 Final Findings of Apportionment for the Local Transportation Fund (LTF), State Transit Assistance (STA), and Senate Bill 1 (SB 1) State of Good Repair (SGR). Together, these programs comprise the Transportation Development Act (TDA) resources.

LTF revenue comes from a 1/4 cent sales tax in Placer County and is used for local transportation programs. The adopted LTF apportionment resulted in $10,865,437 in LTF available to Roseville for FY2024-25. Of the City's LTF revenue, $59,547 is recommended to be paid to Placer County Transportation Planning Agency for the PCTPA Funding Strategy Outreach program to increase public awareness and understanding of transportation needs and funding challenges. The claim revision will trueup the LTF claimed with the Transit and Transportation funding earned in FY2024-25.

STA revenue is derived from state diesel fuel excise taxes with augmentation from SB1 funds. STA funds are applied to administration, operations, maintenance, and capital projects for the City's transit system.

The total STA funds available to Roseville in FY2024-25 is $1,468,986.

SB 1 's State of Good Repair (SGR) program provides needed funding towards maintenance of the Roseville Transit bus fleet. The SGR program is funded by a portion of the State Transportation Improvement Fee on vehicle registrations. The amount of SGR funds available to Roseville in FY2024-25 is $229,455. Combining LTF, STA and SGR funds equals a total request of $12,563,878.

FISCAL IMPACT
The TDA claim revision provides a total of $12,563,878 in revenues that are allocated to the Transportation and Transit Fund programs and projects. A payment of $59,547 is recommended to Placer County Transportation Planning Agency for the PCTPA Funding Strategy Outreach program. There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378.

Submission of the FY2024/25 Transportation Development Act Claim action meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

2. Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world
Respectfully Submitted,
Kimberly Goulet, Administrative Technician
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 26-053

2. 01 - TDA Claim Forms FY 2024-25 Corrected

3. Copy of Correction_KG - FY_2024-25 TDAClaimWorksheet Final

4. TDA Allocations FY2024-25
REVIEWERS:

Kimberly Goulet, Public Works Department - Transportation Created/Initiated - 2/11/2026 Ed Scofield, Public Works Department - Transportation Approved - 2/11/2026 Jason Shykowski, Public Works Department - All Approved - 2/12/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 2/18/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 2/18/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 2/19/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 2/20/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 2/20/2026 Dominick Casey, City Clerk Department Approved - 2/23/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 2/23/2026

RESOLUTION NO. 26-053
APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF THE 2024/25 TRANSPORTATION

DEVELOPMENT ACT CLAIMS REVISION TO THE

PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY
WHEREAS, the California Public Utilities Code, commencing with Section 99200, and Title 21 of the California Code of Regulations, commencing with Section 6600, authorize local transportation funding available through the Local Transportation Fund and State Transit Assistance Fund established by the Transportation Development Act; and WHEREAS, the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency is responsible for reviewing and approving annual transportation claims, and for making allocations from the Local Transportation Fund and State Transit Assistance Funds.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Roseville hereby authorizes and directs the City Manager to execute the FY2024/25 Transportation Development Act Claims revision in the amount of $12,563,878 to the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency as follows:

1. Local Transportation Funds for public transportation system purposes as authorized by Article 4, commencing with Section 99260 of the California Public Utilities Code and for streets and roads purposes authorized by Article 8, commencing with Section 99400 of the California Public Utilities Code, in an aggregate amount not to exceed $10,865,437.

2. State Transit Assistance Funds for transit operations, as authorized by Section 99313 and Section 99314 of the California Public Utilities Code, Chapter 4, Article 6.5, in an aggregate amount not to exceed $1,468,986.

3. State of Good Repair Funds for transit maintenance as provided by in Senate Bill 1, in an aggregate amount not to exceed $229,455.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of __________________________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
___________________________
City Clerk

Transportation Development Act
Claim Forms

Revised September 2024
Contents
TDA CLAIM FORMS ....................................................................................................................................................2

ANNUAL VERIFICATION OF TDA COMPLIANCE TO ACCOMPANY LTF AND STA CLAIMS FOR TRANSIT / STREETS AND ROADS PURPOSES...........................................................................................................................3 STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE QUALIFYING CRITERIA WORKSHEET INSTRUCTIONS.............................................6 CLAIM FOR LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS...............................................................................................7 CLAIM FOR STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDS............................................................................................8 CLAIM FOR STATE OF GOOD REPAIR PROGRAM FUNDS.................................................................................9 TDA ANNUAL PROJECT AND FINANCIAL PLAN.....................................................................................................10 SAMPLE RESOLUTION............................................................................................................................................ 11

2 Revised September 2024

PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY

TDA CLAIM FORMS

TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT (TDA) CLAIM FORMS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO PCTPA A MINIMUM OF THREE WEEKS PRIOR TO A PCTPA BOARD MEETING. FOR THE LATEST BOARD MEETING SCHEDULE, VISIT WWW.PCTPA.NET.

A completed claim package includes the following completed forms:
• TDA Compliance Checklist
• TDA Claim Worksheet (Excel file)
• STA Qualifying Criteria Worksheet (Excel file)
• Claim for Local Transportation Funds
• Claim for State Transit Assistance Funds
• Claim for State of Good Repair Program Funds
• TDA Annual Project and Financial Plan (see attached sample) Certified copy of resolution from the claimant's governing board approving the claim and its submittal to PCTPA. The resolution must include the amount claimed, the fiscal year for which funds are claimed, and the purpose for which the claim is made, identified by the article and section of the Act which authorizes such claims. See attached sample resolution.

If claiming Article 8c funds, copy of signed contract with whom claimant is contracting for transit service.

Only ONE copy of the claim form and PCTPA Board of Directors resolution will be returned to the claimant following approval.

Audit Policy
To help ensure that TDA audits are completed in a timely manner and the requirements of the TDA are met, the following policy was adopted by the PCTPA Board on March 22, 2006:

After approval of the Final TDA Apportionment, claimants who submit TDA claims will receive only 50% of the total approved Local Transportation Fund (LTF) claim if a completed TDA audit has not been received by PCTPA at the time of the claim.

The remaining 50% of approved LTF claim will be paid to the claimant upon receipt by PCTPA of the completed TDA audit. State Transit Assistance (STA) claims will be paid in full following approval of an STA claim, regardless of whether a completed TDA audit has been received.

3 Revised September 2024

ANNUAL VERIFICATION OF TDA COMPLIANCE TO ACCOMPANY LTF AND STA CLAIMS

FOR TRANSIT / STREETS AND ROADS PURPOSES
PART I – ALL CLAIMANTS

1. Date annual TDA fiscal and compliance audit was approved by PCTPA Board:

Click or tap to enter a date.

2. Is the claimant's retirement system fully funded?
☐ YES
☒ NO

3. Is the claimant using the maximum Federal funds available for transit and/or streets/roads purposes?
☒ YES
☐ NO
PART II – TRANSIT CLAIMANTS

4. Date Transit Operator's Financial Transaction Report was submitted to State Controller's Office: Click or tap to enter a date. Attach copy of dated, signed cover sheet rom report.

5. Are public transit vehicles routinely staffed with one driver? ☒ YES
☐ NO (Explain) Click or tap here to enter text.

6. Has the proposed transit operating budget changed by more than 15% compared to the previous year?
☐ Yes (Explain) Click or tap here to enter text.
☒ NO

7. Did the transit operator meet its minimum farebox recovery requirement during the previous fiscal year? (requirement: 15% - Roseville; 12.94% - Placer County; 10% - Auburn)1
☒ YES
☐ NO (see below)
If the farebox recovery requirement was not met, then claimant must complete the following worksheet for the most recent fiscal year. 1Assembly Bill 90, 2019-20 [Reg. Session] temporarily prohibits the penalty for non-compliance with farebox recovery ratio requirement during FY 2019-20 and 2020-21. The claimant should still identify whether the requirement was met. AB 149 of 2021 extends the noncompliance relief through FY 2022/23, and AB 125 of 2023 further extended it through FY 2025/26.

4 Revised September 2024
Transit Operating Expenses: enter text. +
Capital Purchases/Reserves: enter text. = LTF spent in most Subtotal: enter text. - recent fiscal year
Federal Revenues: enter text. = cannot exceed
STA Revenues: enter text. - result below.

Total: enter text. * 0.5= enter text.

8. Is there a prohibition on the employment of part-time drivers or on contracting with common carriers?
☐ YES
☒ NO (Explain) Click or tap here to enter text.

9. Are STA funds being used for transit operating purposes this fiscal year? ☒ YES (see below)
☐ NO
If STA funds are being used for transit operating purposes, indicate which efficiency standard was met. In calculating the operating cost, operators may exclude costs that exceed prior year costs, as adjusted by the CPI. Notes: (1) Use the STA Qualifying Criteria worksheet contained in the TDA Claim workbook to determine eligible exclusions. (2) These items may also be excluded when computing the farebox recovery ratio. (3) You may refer to operating cost figures from TDA fiscal audits for the applicable fiscal year.

Efficiency Standard #1: ☒ Yes ☐ No2
Efficiency Standard #2: ☒ Yes ☐ No2
If neither efficiency standard was met, list the percentage of STA Funding limited to:

Capital Expenditures: Enter %% Operating Expenditures: Enter %.%

10. Describe or attach current fare structure:

Please see the attached fare structure as outlined in the Roseville Transit Service Guides, overview on Roseville Transit’s website at
https://www.roseville.ca.us/cms/One.aspx?portalId=7964922&pageId=8756474

11. Attach copy of latest CHP terminal inspection report. ATTACHED

12. Each transit claimant must report on efforts to implement recommendations included in the FY 2018/19 through FY 2020/21 Triennial Performance Audit, which was completed in 2022 (attach additional pages as necessary).

Roseville has developed a standard policy for calculating FTE’s and we have been using that standard since the last Triennial Performance Audit.

5 Revised September 2024
2Assembly Bill 90, 2019-20 [Reg. Session] temporarily prohibits the penalty for non-compliance with required STA efficiency standards during FY 2019-20 and 2020-21. The claimant should still identify whether the standards was met. AB 149 of 2021 extends the noncompliance relief through FY 2022/23, and AB 125 of 2023 further extended it through FY 2025/26.

6 Revised September 2024

PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY

STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE

QUALIFYING CRITERIA WORKSHEET INSTRUCTIONS
Assembly Bill 90 of 2019-20 temporarily provides relief from non-compliance with STA Qualifying Criteria for FY 2019-20 and 2020-21 due to impact of COVID-19 on transit agencies. AB 149 of 2021 extended non-compliance relief through FY 2022/23, and AB 125 of 2023 further extended it through FY 2025/26.

The purpose of the STA Qualifying Criteria Worksheet is for the claimant to determine the proportion of STA funding eligible for operating and capital expenditures in the current fiscal year. Per STA regulations, one of two efficiency standards must be met for a claimant to utilize its full STA Allocation for operating purposes. The first efficiency standard evaluates whether the total operating cost per revenue vehicle hour increased at a rate greater than the prior year total operating cost per revenue vehicle hour as adjusted by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the State of California. The second efficiency standard evaluates whether the average total operating cost per revenue vehicle hour in the three latest years increased at a rate greater than the average of the preceding three years total operating cost per revenue vehicle hour as adjusted by CPI for the same period. Should neither efficiency standard be met, STA funding for operating expenditures will be reduced by the lowest percentage by which the claimant’s total operating cost per revenue vehicle hour exceeded the target for either standard. The remaining percentage will be limited for capital expenditures.

The STA Qualifying Criteria worksheet is a tab embedded within the TDA Claim Worksheet. The STA Qualifying Criteria worksheet simplifies the process of calculating the proportion of STA funding eligible for operating and capital expenditures. Please visit www.pctpa.net/TDA to download the file. The worksheet requires entry of the prior four years audited data for operating costs, allowable cost exemptions/exclusions under TDA, and revenue vehicle hours. Enter the appropriate numbers into Data Input Sections A, B, and D. DO NOT enter any numbers in the yellow highlighted boxes, as these boxes have been set up with formulas to automatically tabulate your claims. Cell O7 and O11 will indicate whether Efficiency Standard 1 or 2 are satisfied, respectively. Cell Q13 indicates the amount limited for capital expenditures while cell Q15 indicates the amount eligible for operating purposes.

This information should be input into question 9 of the Annual Verification Of TDA Compliance. The excel version of the qualifying criteria worksheet should be submitted with all other documents and forms when submitting a claim.

7 Revised September 2024

CLAIM FOR LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS
TO: PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY
2260 DOUGLAS BLVD, SUITE 130; ROSEVILLE, CA 95661
FROM:

CLAIMANT: City of Roseville
ADDRESS: 316 Vernon St
Roseville, CA 95678
CONTACT PERSON: Ed Scofield
Phone:916-774-5449 Email:ECScofield @roseville.ca.us
The City of Roseville hereby requests, in accordance with the State of California Public Utilities Code, commencing with Section 99200 and the California Code of Regulations commencing with Section 6600, that this claim for Local Transportation Funds be approved for Fiscal Year 2024/25, in the following amounts for the following purposes to be drawn from the Local Transportation Fund deposited with the Placer County Treasurer:

P.U.C. 99260a, Article 4, Transit Operations: $4,752,907 P.U.C. 99260a, Article 4, Transit Capital: $1,307,186
P.U.C. 99275, Article 4.5, Community Transit Services
P.U.C. 99400a, Article 8a, Local Streets and Roads $4,745,797 P.U.C. 99402, Article 8a, Transportation Planning Process $59,547 P.U.C. 99400c, Article 8c, Contracted Transit Services:

P.U.C. 99400e, Article 8e, Capital for Contracted Services:

C.C.R. 6648, Capital Reserve:

When approved, this claim will be transmitted to the Placer County Auditor for payment. Approval of the claim and payment by the County Auditor to the applicant is subject to such monies being available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved annual financial plan and budget. Claimant must submit a complete Fiscal and Compliance Audit for the prior fiscal year prior to issuance of instructions to the County Auditor to pay the claimant in full.

APPROVED: APPLICANT:

PLACER COUNTY

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY

BOARD OF DIRECTORS
BY: BY:
(signature) (signature)
TITLE: TITLE:

DATE: DATE:

City Manager

8 Revised September 2024

CLAIM FOR STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDS
TO: PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY
2260 DOUGLAS BLVD, SUITE 130; ROSEVILLE, CA 95661
FROM:

CLAIMANT: City of Roseville
ADDRESS: 316 Vernon St
Roseville, CA 95678
CONTACT PERSON: Ed Scofield
Phone:916-774-5449 Email:[email protected]
The City of Roseville hereby requests, in accordance with the State of California Public Utilities Code commencing with Section 99200 and the California Code of Regulations commencing with Section 6600, that this claim for State Transit Assistance be approved in the amount of $1,468,986 for Fiscal Year 2024/25 , in the following amounts for the following purposes to be drawn from the State Transit Assistance fund deposited with the Placer County Treasurer:

Transit Operations (6730a): $1,468,986
Transit Capital (6730a): $Click or tap here to enter $
Contracted Transit Services (6731b): $Click or tap here to enter $ Community Transit Services Provided by WPCTSA (6731.1): $Click or tap here to enter $ When approved, this claim will be transmitted to the Placer County Auditor for payment. Approval of the claim and payment by the County Auditor to the applicant is subject to such monies being available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved annual financial plan and budget.

APPROVED: APPLICANT:

PLACER COUNTY

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY

BOARD OF DIRECTORS
BY: BY:
(signature) (signature)
TITLE: TITLE:

DATE: DATE:

City Manager

9 Revised September 2024

CLAIM FOR STATE OF GOOD REPAIR PROGRAM FUNDS
TO: PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY
2260 DOUGLAS BLVD, SUITE 130; ROSEVILLE, CA 95661
FROM:

CLAIMANT: City of Roseville
ADDRESS: 316 Vernon St
Roseville, CA 95678
CONTACT PERSON: Ed Scofield
Phone:916-774-5449 Email:[email protected]
The City of Roseville hereby requests, in accordance with the State of California Public Utilities Code commencing with Section 99200 and the California Code of Regulations commencing with Section 6600, that this claim for State of Good Repair Funds be approved in the amount of $229,455 for Fiscal Year 2024/25, in the following amounts for the following purposes to be drawn from the State Transit Assistance fund deposited with the Placer County Treasurer.

Transit Capital (6730a): $229,455
When approved, this claim will be transmitted to the Placer County Auditor for payment. Approval of the claim and payment by the County Auditor to the applicant is subject to such monies being available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved annual financial plan and budget.

APPROVED: APPLICANT:

PLACER COUNTY

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY

BOARD OF DIRECTORS
BY: BY:
(signature) (signature)
TITLE: TITLE:

DATE: DATE:

City Manager

11 Revised September 2024

SAMPLE RESOLUTION
In the matter of a Resolution approving and authorizing execution of the Fiscal Year 2024/2025 Local Transportation Fund, State Transit Assistance, and State of Good Repair Claims to the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency.

The following resolution was duly passed by the [name of governing board] of [name of claimant] at a regular meeting held [date of meeting], by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Signed and approved by me after its passage. Attest:
[Signature of chair of governing board] [Signature of governing board clerk] WHEREAS, the California Public Utilities Code commencing with Section 99200 and the California Code of Regulations commencing with Section 6600 authorizing local transportation funding available through the Local Transportation Fund and State Transit Assistance Fund established by the Transportation Development Act; and
WHEREAS, the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency is responsible for reviewing and approving annual transportation claims, and for making allocations from the Local Transportation Fund and State Transit Assistance Funds.

Be it hereby resolved by the [name of governing board] of [name of claimant] that the [chair of governing board or authorized staff person] is authorized and directed to execute the attached Fiscal Year 2024/25 Transportation Development Act Claim(s) to the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency, in the amount of:
$ [total LTF amount] of Local Transportation Funds for transit purposes as authorized by Article 4, commencing with Section 99260 of the California Public Utilities Code and Article 8 commencing with Section 99400(c).
$ [total LTF amount] of Local Transportation Funds for and for streets and roads purposes authorized by Article 8, commencing with Section 99400 and for the transportation planning process authorized by Article 8, commencing with section 99402. $ [total STA amount] of State Transit Assistance funds for transit operations, as authorized by Section 99313 and Section 99314 of the California Public Utilities Code, Chapter 4, Article 6.5 $ [total SGR amount] of State of Good Repair funds for transit capital, as authorized by the Caltrans SGR guidelines and complying with Public Resources Code§ 21100 and§ 21150.).

12 Revised September 2024
$ [total LTF Bike/Ped amount] of Local Transportation Funds for bicycle and pedestrian purposes, as authorized by the California Public Utilities Code Section 99233.3, and by the California Code of Regulations Section 6655.2.

Be it further resolved that this claim is hereby approved by the [name of governing board].

FISCAL YEAR:

CITY/COUNTY OF:
$ 8,320,939.00
$ 38,763.00
$ -
$ -
$ 1,504,369.65
$ 161,481.22
$ 891,481.00
$ 130,361.12
$ -
$ 2,484,854.50
$ 2,024,350.50
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 1,532,812.00
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 198,196.00
$ -
$ 441,882.20

11. SGR-Capital (CCR 6730b)
F. Other Grants:

1. PCAPCD- ZEB Depot

2. SPRTA- South Placer Capital

7. STAF-Operations (CCR 6730a)
Part 1 of 4
I. FY 2023/24 AVAILABLE RESOURCES
D. State Grants (Source/Amount):
$ -

3. LTF-Community Transit Services(PUC 99275; Article 4.5)

4. LTF-Contracted Transit Service (PUC 99400c; Article 8c)

5. LTF-Capital Reserve Contribution (CCR 6648)

9. STAF-Community Transit Services (CCR 6730d; <CTSA>)

6. LTF-Capital expenses for contracted transit services (PUC 99400e; Article 8e)

8. STAF-Capital (CCR 6730b)

2. LTF-Capital (PUC 99260a; Article 4)

ESTIMATED PUBLIC TRANSIT REVENUES AND EXPENSES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023/24
C. Federal Grants & Reimbursements received in 2023/24:

F. Operating Revenues:

3. FTA Capital Assistance

2. Caltrans- Roseville Transit Comprehensive Operational Analysis

PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY

TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT CLAIM WORKSHEET
B. Interest Earnings through June 30, 2023.

A. Carryover from prior fiscal year (Unexpended prior year transit cash receipts held in claimants treasury as of June 30, 2023. From TDA Financial Audit Report)

1. FTA Planning Assistance

4. Other (list) __COVID-19/ARPA/CARES________________________

1. LTF-Operations (PUC 99260a; Article 4)

10. STAF-Contracted Service (CCR 6731b)

2. FTA Operating Assistance

3. Other
E. Local Cash Grants:

City of Roseville

1. LCTOP- ZEB Replacement, ZEB Depot, Galleria Electric Charging Infrastructure
2024/25

$ 518,604.39
$ -
$ -
$ 770,174.22
$ 144,599.93
$ 19,162,868.73
H. TOTAL FY 2023/24 AVAILABLE RESOURCES
(A+B+C+D+E+F+G)

1. Other Revenues:

2. Interest Revenue

1. Passenger Fares
G. Other Revenues

2. Charters

3. Other (list) __________________________

$ 555,144.49
$ -
$ -
$ 264,918.16
$ 61,849.74
$ 1,121,591.51
$ (17,835.55)
$ 689,320.06
$ 16,869.94
$ 69,757.00
$ 3,703,125.08
$ 19,361.73
$ 125,414.00
$ 208,555.95
$ 274,041.00
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 313,974.66
$ 124,130.14
$ 862,496.74
$ 600,682.33
$ 16,831.33
$ 147,250.78
$ 1,272,753.07
$ 928,477.94
$ 9,094.02
$ 45,117.75
$ 8,442.86
$ 11,421,364.73
$ 7,741,504.00

11. Indirect Costs & Other Costs Reimbursed
M. TOTAL FY 2023/24 EXPENSES & USES (I+J+K+L)
N. Estimated Deferred Revenue as of June 30, 2023 (H-M)

15. Transfers Out - Transit Shuttle Fee
L. Other Uses:

10. Signal Pre-Emptions for Transit Services

7. Purchased Transit Services

8. Facility Services/System Repair & Maintenance

9. PW-AT Workforce Development

4. CorpYard Building B Improvements

3. ZEB Depot Phase I

2. Commuter Bus Replacement

1. Taylor Rd Commuter Bus Stop

1. Other Capital Projects
K. Capital Assets (Itemize)

4. Vehicle Materials & Supplies

5. Utilities

6. Insurance

13. Interest

10. Other Materials and Supplies
II. FY 2023/24 PROJECTED EXPENSES & USES
I. Personnel

1. Administrative Salaries and Wages

12. Miscellaneous

1. Professional Services

14. Leases & Rentals

2. Maintenance Services

3. Other Services

5. Roseville Transit Comprehensive Operational Analysis

7. South Placer County Express Bus Service - Capital

8. ZEB Depot Phase II

2. Operating Salaries and Wages

3. Other Salaries and Wages

4. Fringe Benefits
J. Services and Supplies

9. IT Services

$ 7,741,504.00
$ 76,108.00
$ -
$ 1,985,257.00
$ 1,588,935.69
$ 12,219.62
$ -
$ 421,688.06
$ 682,324.47
$ -
$ -
$ 180,083.00
$ -
$ 12,688,119.84

1. Passenger Fares

1. LCTOP - ZEB Replacement, ZEB Depot, Galleria Electric Charging Infrastructure

1. PCAPCD - ZEB Depot

2. SPRTA -
B. Interest earnings through June 30, 2024
C. Federal Grants (Source/Amount)
D. State Grants (Source/Amount):

4. Other (list) _CRRSSA/ARPA/CARES____
Part 2 of 4
I. FY 2024/25 NON-TDA BUDGETED RESOURCES & DEFERRED REVENUE A. Carryover from prior fiscal year (Unexpended prior year transit cash receipts held in claimants treasury as of June 30, 2024-- From Part 1, line N)

2. Solutions for Congested Corridors (SCCP) - PSGC I South Placer Transit

2. Revenue Pending Receipt After Audit Completion

2. FTA Operating Assistance

3. FTA Capital Assistance

1. FTA Planning Assistance

3. Other (list) _Auxiliary Transportation Revenue___

1. Non-Transportation Revenue
H. TOTAL FY 2024/25 CARRYOVER & NON-TDA BUDGETED
RESOURCES (A+B+C+D+E+F+G)

2. Charters
F. Operating Revenues:

E. Local Non-TDA Cash Grants:

BUDGETED PUBLIC TRANSIT REVENUES & EXPENSES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024/25 G. Other Revenues

$ 12,688,119.84
II. FY 2024/25 PROJECTED EXPENSES & USES
$ 599,014.41
$ -
$ -
$ 297,996.67
$ 81,433.90
$ 1,127,255.88
$ (475.11)
$ 741,845.33
$ 17,880.84
$ 122,022.00
$ 4,041,747.00
$ 72,420.60
$ 131,011.00
$ 177,297.08
$ 319,604.00
$ -
$ (33,531.60)
$ -
$ 414.49
$ 2,773,405.90
$ 88,572.39
$ 61,498.77
$ 268,713.56
$ 184,496.31
$ 85,064.72
$ 2,123,373.24
$ 63,569.61
$ 81,199.12
$ 7,000,000.00
$ 20,823.73

5. Utilities

6. Insurance

7. Purchased Transit Services

12. Miscellaneous, Cash Over/Short, Uncollectible, Other Fees

13. Interest

14. Leases & Rentals

5. Zero Emission Bus Depot Project

2. Other Capital Projects

9. ZEB Depot Phase II

1. Taylor Rd Commuter Bus Stop
L. Capital Assets (Itemize):

3. Other Salaries and Wages

4. Fringe Benefits

1. Professional Services

2. Maintenance Services
K. Services and Supplies:

8. Facility Services / System Repair & Maintenance

9. IT Services

10. Other Materials and Supplies

3. Other Services

4. Vehicle Materials & Supplies

1. Administrative Salaries and Wages

10. PW-AT Workforce Development

11. Indirect Costs & Other Costs Reimbursed

2. Operating Salaries and Wages

6. Purchase of Eight Replacement Dial-A-Ride Buses

7. Roseville Transit Comprehensive Operational Analysis

8. South Placer County Express Bus Service - Capital

4. Microtransit Vehicle and Charger Purchase
J. Personnel:

3. On Board Bus Technology
M. Other Uses:

1. Operational & Capital Reserve
I. TOTAL FY 2024/25 CARRYOVER & NON-TDA BUDGETED
RESOURCES (From Line H)

2. Commuter Bus Replacement

N. TOTAL FY 2024/25 EXPENSES & USES (J+K+L+M) $ 20,446,653.84 O. Unfunded Balance (I - N) $ (7,758,534.00)

O. Unfunded Balance (I - N) $ (7,758,534.00)
$ 4,752,907.00
$ 1,307,186.00
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 6,060,093.00
$ 1,468,986.00
$ -
$ -
$ -

5. TOTAL STAF CLAIM (Q1+Q2+Q3+Q4) $ 1,468,986.00
$ 229,455.00
$ 229,455.00
$ 7,758,534.00

2. LTF-Capital (PUC 99260a; Article 4)
P. FY 2024/25 LTF TRANSIT CLAIMS:

III. FY 2024/25 TDA TRANSIT CLAIMS
R. FY 2024/25 SGR CLAIMS:

6. LTF-Capital for contracted transit service
(PUC 99400e; Article 8e)

4. STAF-Contracted Service (CCR 6731b)

1. SGR-Capital (CCR 6730b)

2. TOTAL SGR CLAIM (R1)
Q. FY 2024/25 STAF CLAIMS:

4. LTF-Contracted Transit Service (PUC 99400c: Article 8c)

5. LTF-Capital Reserve Contribution (CCR 6648)

1. STAF-Operations (CCR 6730a)

2. STAF-Capital (CCR 6730b)

3. STAF-Community Transit Services (CCR 6730d) / CTSA

3. LTF-Community Transit Services (PUC 99275; Article 4.5) S. TOTAL 2024/25 TRANSIT CLAIMS (P6 + Q5 + R2)

7. TOTAL LTF CLAIM (P1+P2+P3+P4+P5)

1. LTF-Operations (PUC 99260a; Article 4)

I. FY 2023/24 AVAILABLE TDA STREET AND ROAD RESOURCES
$ 5,457,921.00
$ 6,765,847.00
$ (1,175.00)
$ 12,222,593.00
$ 1,018,263.49
$ 423,522.59
$ 3,851,542.49
$ 225,000.00
$ 211,045.00
$ 5,729,373.57
$ 6,493,219.43

ESTIMATED STREETS AND ROADS TDA EXPENDITURES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023/24
A. Carryover from prior fiscal year (Actual Unexpended Prior Year TDA Streets And Roads Cash Receipts Held in Claimant's Treasury as of June 30, 2023. From TDA Fiscal Audits)
B. FY 2023/24 TDA Cash Receipts from LTF trust fund for streets and roads purposes (PUC 99400a).

C. Interest Earned on claimant TDA streets and roads cash balances through June 30, 2023.

II. FY 2023/24 TDA STREET AND ROAD EXPENDITURES
K. Estimated Carryover of TDA Street and Road Revenues at June 30, 2024 (D-J)
H. Transportation Planning Process (P.U.C. 99402)
I. Other
Part 3 of 4
D. Total FY 2023/24 Available TDA Street and Road Resources. (A+B+C) E. Administration and Engineering
J. TOTAL FY 2023/24 EXPENDITURES (E+F+G+H+I)
F. Maintenance
G. Construction

$ 6,493,219.43
$ 10,865,437.00
$ 6,060,093.00
$ 4,805,344.00
$ 4,745,797.00
$ 59,547.00
$ 86,123.00
$ 11,384,686.43
$ 1,026,220.58
$ 355,746.58
$ 7,077,681.50
$ -
$ 59,547.00
$ 222,717.00
$ 1,000,000.00
$ 9,741,912.66
$ 1,642,773.77
N. Capital Reserves

1. FY 2024/25 LTF Total Apportionment (From PCTPA)
Part 4 of 4
O. Total FY 2024/25 Estimated Expenditures (H+I+J+K+L+M+N) P. Estimated Carryover as of June 30 , 2025 (D-N)
J. Construction
K. Equipment
L. Transportation Planning Process (P.U.C. 99402)
M. Other- Indirect Costs
II. FY 2024/25 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
I. Maintenance
B. 2024/25 TDA Funds Available For Streets And Roads
C. FY 2024/25 Estimated Interest Earned on TDA Cash Balances through June 30, 2025.

D. Total Estimated FY 2024/25 Available TDA Resources. (A+B4+C)

3. Balance of 2024/25 LTF Apportionment (B1-B2)

2. FY 2024/25 LTF Transit Claim (From Part 2, Line P6)

4. FY 2024/25 LTF Apportionment To be Claimed for Streets and Roads Purposes Pursuant to PUC 99400a. (Can Not Exceed Line B3)
A. Carryover as of June 30, 2024 (From Part 3, Line K.) STREETS AND ROADS TDA BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024/25
I. FY 2024/25 AVAILABLE TDA STREET AND ROAD RESOURCES

5. FY 2024/25 LTF Apportionment To be Claimed for Transportation Planning Purposes Pursuant to PUC 99402a.

H. Administration and Engineering

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 3/4/2026
Item #: VII.9
File #: 0709
Item ID: 2026-92
Title: Reservation of Affordable Housing Funds for Development of the Pleasant Grove Apartments Phase II
Contact: Kristine Faelz 916-774-5451 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval to reserve $3,000,000 in affordable housing funds for an affordable housing project to be developed in Roseville. The request is to reserve $1,500,000 from the City Local Housing Trust Fund and $1,500,000 from the State Local Housing Trust Fund for construction of Mercy Housing's affordable housing project, Pleasant Grove Apartments Phase II. The City's Local Housing Trust Fund receives funding from developer in-lieu fees and payoffs from developer subsidized affordable purchase loans. The Housing Division has funding available in the Local Housing Trust Fund (LHTF), which will be used to match available state-awarded LHTFs. No General Fund resources will be used.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to reserve $1,500,000 from the City of Roseville Local Housing Trust Fund and $1,500,000 from the State Local Housing Trust Fund, for a total reservation of $3,000,000, toward the construction of Mercy Housing’s affordable housing project, Pleasant Grove Apartments Phase II.

BACKGROUND
The Roseville Housing Division was awarded Local Housing Trust Fund (LHTF) Program funds by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) in the 2021 and 2022 funding rounds. This funding provides matching grants to Local Housing Trust Funds established by cities and counties, Native American Tribes and incorporated 501 (c)(3) non-profit organizations. The objective of the LHTF grant is to expand funding sources in order to increase the supply of affordable housing. Eligible activities include construction loans and/or permanent financing loans to pay for predevelopment costs, acquisition costs, and other costs associated with the development or rehabilitation of affordable rental housing projects, or emergency shelters, transitional housing, permanent supportive housing, and affordable homebuyer/homeowner projects.

A portion of the funds awarded in the 2021 and 2022 rounds remains uncommitted and is available for eligible affordable housing activities. Accordingly, the Roseville Housing Division released a Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) on November 7, 2025, and invited applications from qualified affordable housing developers and project sponsors. The NOFA made available $3 million in capital funding from City of Roseville and State LHTF sources, with the Housing Division providing the required 1:1 match from funds collected through in-lieu fees and affordable housing loan repayments. The Housing Division received one response to the NOFA. Mercy Housing requested $3 million for their 49-unit Pleasant Grove Apartments Phase II project. The proposed funding reservation demonstrates a commitment of local funds and strengthens the project’s competitiveness for tax credit financing, improving its ability to leverage additional state and federal affordable housing resources.

Subject to completion of full project underwriting and City Council approval, Housing Division staff will return to Council with the required loan documents, regulatory agreement, and related development documents for review and consideration at a future meeting.

FISCAL IMPACT
The City’s Local Housing Trust Fund is funded through developer in-lieu fees and repayments of developer-subsidized affordable purchase loans. The Housing Division has $1.5 million available in Local Housing Trust Fund resources, in addition to $1.5 million in state funds, which it intends to leverage for this project. No General Fund resources will be used.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The request for reservation of funds to develop affordable housing meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community

3. Enhance economic vitality
Respectfully Submitted,
Kristine Faelz, Housing Analyst
Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 26-052
REVIEWERS:

Kristine Faelz, Economic Development Department - Housing Created/Initiated - 2/4/2026 Trisha Isom, Economic Development Department - Housing Approved - 2/5/2026 Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Department Approved - 2/5/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 2/18/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 2/18/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 2/19/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 2/19/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 2/19/2026 Dominick Casey, City Clerk Department Approved - 2/23/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 2/23/2026

RESOLUTION NO. 26-052
APPROVING THE RESERVATION OF $3,000,000 IN AFFORDABLE HOUSING FUNDS

FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PLEASANT GROVE APARTMENTS PHASE II WHEREAS, the Roseville Housing Division was awarded Local Housing Trust Fund (LHTF) Program funds by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) in the 2021 and 2022 funding rounds; and
WHEREAS, a portion of the funds awarded in the 2021 and 2022 rounds remains uncommitted and is available for eligible affordable housing activities; and

WHEREAS, the Roseville Housing Division released a Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) on November 7, 2025, and invited applications from qualified affordable housing developers and project sponsors; and
WHEREAS, the NOFA made available $3 million in capital funding from City of Roseville and State LHTF sources, with the Housing Division providing the required 1:1 match from funds collected through in-lieu fees and affordable housing loan repayments; and WHEREAS, the Housing Division received one response to the NOFA; and WHEREAS, Mercy Housing requested $3 million for their 49-unit Pleasant Grove Apartments Phase II project; and
WHEREAS, the proposed funding reservation demonstrates a commitment of local funds and strengthens the project’s competitiveness for tax credit financing, improving its ability to leverage additional state and federal affordable housing resources.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City, that it hereby approves reserving $1,500,000 from the City of Roseville Local Housing Trust Fund and $1,500,000 from the State Local Housing Trust Fund toward the construction of the Pleasant Grove Apartments Phase II by Mercy Housing.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 3/4/2026
Item #: VII.10
File #: 0800-03
Item ID: 2026-104
Title: Western Systems Power Pool Agreement Collateral Annex and Cover Sheet Contact: Patrick Zanardelli 916-774-5673 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of the Western Systems Power Pool (WSPP) Collateral Annex, including the Cover Sheet Elections, with NRG Business Marketing LLC (NRG) and Triolith Energy Fund, LP (Triolith).

The documents supplement the WSPP Agreement previously executed by the City and establish industrystandard credit and collateral provisions that would apply to any future wholesale physical power transactions with NRG and Triolith under the WSPP framework. There is no cost associated with the execution of these documents.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt resolutions authorizing the City Manager to execute the Western Systems Power Pool Collateral Annex and Cover Sheet Elections with NRG Business Marketing LLC and Triolith Energy Fund, LP.

BACKGROUND
The City Council approved updated Electric Utility Risk Management Policies in May 2025. These policies require Roseville Electric Utility to manage the financial risks associated with providing electricity by limiting cost exposure through the procurement of fixed-price electricity and natural gas over a three-year planning horizon.

Roseville Electric Utility has historically used the Western Systems Power Pool (WSPP) Agreement as its standard contractual framework for physical power transactions. The Collateral Annex and Cover Sheet Elections are standardized supplements to that agreement, used to define bilateral credit and collateral obligations with individual counterparties. These documents provide enhanced credit protections to the City by requiring the posting of collateral when exposure thresholds are exceeded or credit conditions change.

While both NRG Business Marketing LLC (NRG) and Triolith Energy Fund, LP (Triolith) are WSPP signatories, they have not previously transacted bilaterally under the WSPP framework. Executing the Collateral Annex and Cover Sheet Elections with NRG and Triolith does not authorize any transactions but ensures credit protections are in place should Roseville elect to transact with NRG or Triolith in the future.

Any such transactions will remain subject to the City’s Energy Trading Authority Policy (Resolution No. 25- 149), approved by City Council on May 21, 2025.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the execution of the WSPP Collateral Annex and Cover Sheet Elections with NRG Business Marketing LLC and Triolith Energy Fund, LP, as these documents serve as

enabling agreements.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378.

Entering into enabling agreements with NRG Business Marketing LLC and Triolith Energy Fund, LP is not considered a “project” as defined by CEQA and consequently no CEQA action is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

2. Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world
Respectfully Submitted,
Patrick Zanardelli, Electric Business Analyst
Daniel Beans, Electric Utility Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 26-049

2. NRG Collateral Annex

3. NRG Collateral Annex Cover Sheet

4. Resolution 26-050

5. Triolith Collateral Annex

6. Triolith Collateral Annex Cover Sheet
REVIEWERS:

Patrick Zanardelli, Electric Department - Customer & Government Relations and Financial & Administrative
Created/Initiated -
2/9/2026
Joanna Cucchi, Electric Department - Financial & Administrative Approved - 2/12/2026 Shawn Matchim, Electric Department - All Approved - 2/13/2026 Daniel Beans, Electric Department - All Approved - 2/13/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 2/18/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 2/18/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 2/19/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 2/19/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 2/19/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 2/19/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval -
2/19/2026

RESOLUTION NO. 26-049

APPROVING THE WESTERN SYSTEMS POWER POOL COLLATERAL ANNEX AND

COVER SHEET ELECTIONS, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND

NRG BUSINESS MARKETING LLC, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER

TO EXECUTE THEM ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, Roseville Electric Utility has historically used the Western Systems Power Pool (WSPP) Agreement as its standard contractual framework for physical power transactions; and
WHEREAS, the Collateral Annex and Cover Sheet Elections are standardized supplements to that agreement, used to define bilateral credit and collateral obligations with individual counterparties; and
WHEREAS, the Collateral Annex and Cover Sheet Elections to the WSPP Agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and NRG Business Marketing LLC, have been reviewed by the City Council.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Western Systems Power Pool Collateral Annex and Cover Sheet Elections are hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute them on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk

Revision November 30, 2009
1 COLLATERAL ANNEX
to the

WSPP AGREEMENT
This Collateral Annex to the WSPP Agreement together with the Cover Sheet Elections (collectively, the “Collateral Annex”), dated January 16, 2026, between City of Roseville (“Party A”) and NRG Business Marketing LLC (“Party B”) (each a “Party” and, collectively, the “Parties”), is applicable to all transactions between the Parties conducted under the WSPP Agreement, including any amendments and annexes thereto agreed between the Parties (collectively, the “WSPP Agreement”).

The Obligations of each Party to the other Party under the WSPP Agreement shall be secured in accordance with the provisions of this Collateral Annex, which sets forth the conditions under which a Party will be required to deliver Performance Assurance and the conditions under which a Party will be required to release and return Performance Assurance.

To the extent there are any inconsistencies between the terms and conditions of the WSPP Agreement and this Collateral Annex, this Collateral Annex shall prevail. To the extent there are any inconsistencies between the terms and conditions of this Collateral Annex, excluding the Cover Sheet Elections, and the Cover Sheet Elections, the Cover Sheet Elections shall prevail.

1. Definitions.

For purposes of this Collateral Annex, the following terms have the meanings set forth below or in the provisions referred to below:
“Beneficiary Party” means, at any time, the Party entitled to receive, or that has received and is the beneficiary of, Performance Assurance provided by, or on behalf of, the Posting Party.
“Business Day(s)” has the meaning stated in section 4.1b of the WSPP Agreement. “Cash” means U.S. dollars held by, or on behalf of, a Party as Performance Assurance and which shall be, for purposes of obtaining and perfecting a security interest hereunder, treated as “money” as defined in the UCC.
“Custodial Bank” means a Qualified Institution that has executed a Deposit Account Agreement.
“Collateral Annex” has the meaning stated in the introductory paragraph of this Collateral Annex.
“Collateral Threshold” means, with respect to a Party, the collateral threshold, if any, set forth in Part I of the Cover Sheet Elections for that Party, or if no amount is set forth for such Party, such amount shall be zero (0).
“Credit Rating” means, with respect to an entity other than a Qualified Institution, but including, as applicable, a Party or its Guarantor, as the case may be, on any date of determination: (a) the rating then assigned to such entity’s (i) unsecured debt (such debt not supported by third-party credit enhancement) or (ii) if such rating in clause (i) is unavailable, its corporate credit rating, in each case as issued by Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”), Moody’s Investors

2 Service (“Moody’s”), or Fitch, Inc. (“Fitch”) or other rating agency or agencies to which the Parties may agree in writing, or (b) other such rating to which the Parties may agree in writing, and as further defined or described by the Parties in the Cover Sheet Elections. With respect to a Qualified Institution, “Credit Rating” refers to the ratings issued to the applicable commercial bank or trust company by S&P or Moody’s. “S&P,” “Moody’s” and “Fitch” each includes its successors.
“Collateral Requirement” has the meaning stated in Section 4(c) of this Collateral Annex. “Dealer” has the meaning stated in Section 4.2b of the WSPP Agreement except that no Party or any parent, subsidiary, or other affiliate of a Party shall be a Dealer for purposes of this Collateral Annex.
“Demand Notice” has the meaning given in Section 4(a) hereof. “Deposit Account” means a demand, time, savings, passbook or similar account maintained with a Qualified Institution and subject to a Deposit Account Agreement, which Deposit Account shall, for purposes of obtaining and perfecting a security interest hereunder, be a “deposit account” as defined in UCC § 9-102.
“Deposit Account Agreement” is an agreement, executed by the Parties and a Custodial Bank with which the Deposit Account is or will be maintained under this Agreement, that provides the Beneficiary Party with control of the Deposit Account within the meaning of UCC § 9-104.
“Defaulting Party” has the meaning stated in Section 22.1 of the WSPP Agreement. “Downgrade Event” has the meaning stated in Section 6(a)(iv) of this Collateral Annex. “Downgraded Party” has the meaning stated in Section 6(a)(iv) of this Collateral Annex. “Early Termination” means a termination of one or more transactions in accordance with Section 22.2 of the WSPP Agreement due to an Event of Default. “Eligible Beneficiary Party” has the meaning stated in Section 6(a)(i) of this Collateral Annex.
“Event of Default” has the meaning stated in Section 22.1 of the WSPP Agreement as modified by Section 3 of this Collateral Annex.
“Guarantor” has the meaning stated in Section 4.7e of the WSPP Agreement and is the entity, if any, identified in Part I of the Cover Sheet Elections. “Interest Rate” has the meaning stated in Part VI of the Cover Sheet Elections. “LC Issuer” means (a) an entity having a capital surplus of at least one billion United States dollars ($1,000,000,000.00) and having a Credit Rating of at least (i) “A-” by S&P and “A3” by Moody’s, if such entity is rated by S&P and Moody’s, or (ii) “A-” by S&P or “A3” by Moody’s, if such entity is rated by either S&P or Moody’s, but not both, or (b) any other entity to which the Parties agree in the Cover Sheet Elections or otherwise in writing, provided, that the

3 Parties may agree to another definition of LC Issuer in Part VII of the Cover Sheet Elections or otherwise in writing, which other definition shall supercede the foregoing. “Letter of Credit” means an irrevocable, non-transferable, standby letter of credit, issued by a LC Issuer in a form consistent with the Parties’ agreements stated in Part VII of the Cover Sheet Elections and which letter of credit is otherwise reasonably acceptable to the Beneficiary Party.
“Letter of Credit Default” means with respect to an outstanding Letter of Credit and prior to the time such Letter of Credit is required to be canceled or returned to a Party in accordance with the terms of this Collateral Annex, the occurrence of any of the following events: (a) the issuer of the Letter of Credit has failed to satisfy the criteria of a LC Issuer under this Collateral Annex, the Cover Sheet Elections, or other agreements of the Parties, as applicable; (b) the LC Issuer has failed to comply with or perform its obligations under such Letter of Credit, including, but not limited to a failure to comply with a request to draw thereon in accordance with its terms; (c) the LC Issuer has disaffirmed, disclaimed, repudiated or rejected, in whole or in part, or challenged the validity of, such Letter of Credit; (d) such Letter of Credit has expired or terminated, or has failed or ceased to be in full force and effect at any time during the term of any transaction under the WSPP Agreement for which Performance Assurance is required to be kept in full force and effect hereunder, in any such case without replacement within three (3) Business Days following the date such Letter of Credit expired, terminated or failed or ceased to be in full force and effect; (e) the LC Issuer has initiated or become subject to, or any other party has initiated against LC Issuer (i) a bankruptcy, reorganization, moratorium, liquidation or similar insolvency proceeding under federal or state law, (ii) a similar proceeding for relief under any federal or state bankruptcy or insolvency law affecting creditor’s rights, or (iii) a proceeding to liquidate or wind-up the business or affairs of the LC Issuer; (f) the LC Issuer makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors; or (g) the LC Issuer admits in writing its inability to pay its debts generally as they become due.
“Material Adverse Change” has the meaning stated, for the applicable Party, in Part II of the Cover Sheet Elections.
“Minimum Transfer Amount” means, with respect to a Party, the amount set forth in Part IV of the Cover Sheet Elections for such Party, or if no amount is filled in for such Party, such amount shall be zero (0).
“Non-Performing Party” has the meaning stated in Section 21.3 of the WSPP Agreement.
“Obligations” means, with respect to a Posting Party (a) all debts, liabilities and amounts due or that may become due from the Posting Party to the Beneficiary Party pursuant to (i) the WSPP Agreement, (ii) all outstanding Confirmation Agreements between the Parties under the WSPP Agreement, (iii) this Collateral Annex, (iv) any Security Agreement and (v) any other documents, instruments or agreements executed in connection therewith; and (b) all amounts owed under any modifications, renewals or extensions of the foregoing. “Party” and “Parties” have the respective meanings stated in the introductory paragraph of this Collateral Annex.
“Performance Assurance” means collateral in the form of (i) Cash (whether posted directly with a Beneficiary Party or the Custodial Bank in a Deposit Account, (ii) a Letter of

4 Credit, or (iii) other security in form and subject to terms and conditions that are acceptable to the Beneficiary Party in its sole and absolute discretion. Interest payments on Cash held by a Beneficiary Party will constitute Performance Assurance in the form of Cash. Interest payments on Cash deposited into or otherwise held in a Deposit Account with a Custodial Bank will constitute a part of the Deposit Account held as Performance Assurance. For all purposes hereunder, Performance Assurance in the form of Cash is a margin payment within the meaning of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 101 et seq., including but not limited to sections 101(38), 362(b)(6), 546(e), 548(d), and 556 thereof.
“Posting Deadline” has the meaning given in Part VI of the Cover Sheet Elections. “Posting Party” means, at any time, the Party required to post, or that has posted, Performance Assurance to, or for the benefit of, the Beneficiary Party. “Potential Event of Default” means an event which, (a) with the giving of notice required under Section 22.1 of the WSPP Agreement, if any is required, and (b) the failure to remedy or cure under Section 22.1 of the WSPP Agreement, if remedy or cure is permitted, or both (a) and (b), would be an Event of Default.
“Qualified Institution” means (a) a commercial bank or trust company organized under the laws of the United States or a political subdivision thereof having a capital surplus of at least one billion United States dollars ($1,000,000,000.00) and having a Credit Rating of at least (i) “A-” by S&P and “A3” by Moody’s, if such entity is rated by S&P and Moody’s or (ii) “A-” by S&P or “A3” by Moody’s, if such entity is rated by either S&P or Moody’s, but not both, or (b) any other commercial bank or trust company, or other entity, to which the Parties agree in writing. “Reduction Deadline” has the meaning given in Part VI of the Cover Sheet Elections. “Replacement Letter of Credit” has the meaning given in Section 6(c) hereof. “Replacement Performance Assurance” has the meaning given in Section 6(c) hereof. “Rounding Amount” means, with respect to a Party, the amount, set forth in the Cover Sheet Elections for such Party, or if no amount is filled in for such Party, such amount shall be zero (0).
“Security Agreement” means a Security Agreement, which may be in the form attached hereto, applicable to Performance Assurance in a form other than Cash or a Letter of Credit. “Termination Date” means the date on which the Beneficiary Party shall have received full and final payment of all of the Obligations.
“Termination Payment” means, for purposes of this Collateral Annex, the Termination Payment calculated under Section 22.3 of the WSPP Agreement. “UCC” means the Uniform Commercial Code as in effect from time to time in the State of Utah, without regard to the conflicts of laws rules thereof, except to the extent that the perfection, the effect of perfection or nonperfection and the priority of the security interest granted hereunder, or remedies hereunder, are governed by the law of any jurisdiction other than the State of Utah, the term UCC shall mean the Uniform Commercial Code of such other jurisdiction as necessary to give complete effect to this Collateral Annex.

5 “WSPP Agreement” has the meaning stated in the introductory paragraph of this Collateral Annex.

2. Encumbrance; Grant of Security Interest.
(a) As security for the prompt and complete payment and performance when due of a Party’s Obligations now existing or hereafter arising, each Party hereby pledges, assigns, conveys and transfers to the other Party, and hereby grants to the other Party, a present and continuing security interest in and to, and a general first lien upon and right of set off against, all Performance Assurance which has been or may in the future be transferred to, or received by, the other Party or a Custodial Bank, for the benefit of such other Party, and all interest and other proceeds from time to time received or receivable in respect of, or in exchange for, any or all of the foregoing. Each Party agrees to take such action as the other Party reasonably requests in order to create and perfect the other Party’s continuing security interest in, lien on, and right of setoff against, such Performance Assurance.
(b) The security interest created hereunder shall (i) remain in full force and effect until the security interest granted hereby is terminated in accordance with the second sentence of this Section 2(b), (ii) be binding upon the Posting Party, its successors and assigns and (iii) inure to the benefit of the Beneficiary Party and its successors, transferees and assigns. On the Termination Date, the security interest granted hereunder shall terminate and all rights to the Performance Assurance shall revert to the Posting Party. Upon such termination, the Beneficiary Party shall return all Performance Assurance in its possession or otherwise under its control to the Posting Party pursuant to Section 5(b) of this Collateral Annex and, at the Posting Party’s expense, execute and deliver to the Posting Party such documents as the Posting Party shall reasonably request to evidence termination of the security interest.
(c) The security interest created hereunder is in addition to, and not in lieu of, any and all remedies that may be available under the WSPP Agreement. (d) In the event a Party claims in any judicial proceeding that the grant set forth in Section 2(a) of this Collateral Annex is ineffective and fails to prevail on the claim, then that Party shall pay the other Party’s reasonable attorneys fees incurred in defending against the claim.

3. Additional Events of Default.

The following event is added as an additional Event of Default under Section 22.1 of the WSPP Agreement and is incorporated therein for all purposes under this Collateral Annex:
(f) A Party fails to establish, maintain, transfer or extend Performance Assurance, or return Excess Performance Assurance, in any such case when required pursuant to the Parties’ Collateral Annex.

6 4. Collateral Requirement.
(a) From time to time, on any Business Day prior to 1 p.m. New York time (but no more than once daily), the Beneficiary Party may demand by notice (each a “Demand Notice”) that the Posting Party transfer Performance Assurance to or for the benefit of the Beneficiary Party, in an amount no less than the Collateral Requirement, provided that both conditions (i) and (ii) of this Section 4(a) are satisfied.
(i) No Event of Default has occurred and is continuing where the Beneficiary Party is the Defaulting Party and no Potential Event of Default exists where the Beneficiary Party is the potentially Defaulting Party; (ii) No Early Termination has occurred or been designated with respect to such Beneficiary Party.
(b) After receiving a Demand Notice from the Beneficiary Party pursuant to Section 4(a) of this Collateral Annex, the Posting Party shall, by the Posting Deadline, transfer, or cause to be transferred to the Beneficiary Party or a Custodial Bank, as the case may be, Performance Assurance to, or for the benefit of, the Beneficiary Party, in an amount no less than the Collateral Requirement as defined in Section 4(c) of this Collateral Annex, provided, however, that a Posting Party shall not have an obligation to transfer Performance Assurance until the Collateral Requirement exceeds the Minimum Transfer Amount, at which time the Posting Party shall transfer the entire amount of the Collateral Requirement to the Beneficiary Party, and provided further, that if under this Collateral Annex each Party has an obligation to maintain Performance Assurance with respect to the other Party, the Parties’ obligations to transfer Performance Assurance hereunder, including obligations to return Excess Performance Assurance under Section 5 of this Collateral Annex, at any time shall be determined on a net basis, and the Party with a net positive transfer obligation shall transfer Performance Assurance under this Section 4 in such amount.
(c) The “Collateral Requirement” is the amount calculated, as of the date of the Demand Notice, rounded up to the nearest integral multiple of the Rounding Amount, which is equal to (x) less (y), but no less than zero, where:
(x) is
the Termination Payment, if any, that would be owed to the Beneficiary Party if the Posting Party were the Defaulting Party under Section 22.1 of the WSPP Agreement, plus
the damages, if any, solely under Section 21.3 of the WSPP Agreement that would be owed to the Beneficiary Party if the Posting Party were the Non-Performing Party, plus
any further and additional amounts due for rendered performance by the Beneficiary Party to the Posting Party under any WSPP Agreement transactions, whether or not invoiced or due, and

7 (y) is
the amount of Performance Assurance previously provided by or otherwise credited to the Posting Party for the benefit of the Beneficiary Party and not released as of the time the Beneficiary Party made the demand, plus
the Collateral Threshold applicable to the Posting Party. (d) Any Letter of Credit shall be delivered to such address as the Beneficiary Party shall specify and any such demand made by the Beneficiary Party under this Section 4 shall specify account information for the account to which Performance Assurance in the form of Cash shall be delivered.

5. Reduction, Return, and Substitution of Performance Assurance. (a) Reduction of Performance Assurance. From time to time, on any Business Day prior to 1 p.m. New York time (but no more than weekly with respect to Letters of Credit and daily with respect to Cash or a Deposit Account with the Custodial Bank), a Posting Party may demand that the Beneficiary Party reduce Performance Assurance in an amount equal to the Excess Performance Assurance as defined in this Section, provided, that the Posting Party shall not have any right to demand such reduction if on or prior to such Business Day, an Event of Default has occurred and is continuing where the Posting Party is the Defaulting Party, a Potential Event of Default exists where the Posting Party is the potentially Defaulting Party, or an Early Termination has occurred or been designated with respect to such Posting Party for which the Posting Party has not satisfied its Obligations. The Beneficiary Party shall comply with the demand by transferring, or causing the transfer of, Cash to the Posting Party or reducing the amount(s) of outstanding Letter(s) of Credit the Posting Party previously posted, provided, however, that a Beneficiary Party shall not have an obligation to transfer or cause the transfer of Excess Performance Assurance until the Excess Performance Assurance exceeds the Minimum Transfer Amount, at which time the Posting Party shall transfer the entire amount of the Excess Performance Assurance to the Posting Party. The Posting Party shall have the right to specify such means of compliance, provided, that it may specify Cash only to the extent that Excess Performance Assurance is in the form of Cash held by the Beneficiary Party or a Custodial Bank. If Excess Performance Assurance is returned by reducing the face amount of an outstanding Letter of Credit and the LC Issuer requires that the reduction be implemented through a cancellation of the existing Letter of Credit and the issuance of a new Letter of Credit with a reduced face amount, then (1) the Posting Party shall have delivered a new Letter of Credit to the Beneficiary Party in a form reasonably acceptable to the Beneficiary Party and in an amount that, when combined with the remaining amount of the then-current Performance Assurance, is not less than the thencurrent Collateral Requirement, and (2) in the event that an Event of Default occurs, as to which the Posting Party is the defaulting Party, between the Reduction Deadline and the date on which the new Letter of Credit is executed and delivered to the Beneficiary Party, the Beneficiary Party shall be entitled to draw from the existing Letter of Credit only an amount up to but not exceeding the then-current Collateral Requirement. The cost and expense of compliance

8 (including, but not limited to, the reasonable costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees of the Beneficiary Party and, if applicable, the LC Issuer or Custodial Bank) shall be the sole obligation of, and paid directly by, the Posting Party. If the Beneficiary Party pays any such cost or expense, the Posting Party shall reimburse the Beneficiary Party for each such cost and expense promptly following a demand for reimbursement. The Beneficiary Party shall comply with the demand on or before the Reduction Deadline. Any such demand made by the Posting Party under this Section 5(a) shall specify account information for the account to which Excess Performance Assurance in the form of Cash shall be delivered.
“Excess Performance Assurance” is an amount, calculated as of the date of the demand and rounded down to the nearest integral multiple of the Rounding Amount, which is equal to (x) less (y), but no less than zero, where:
(x) is
the amount of Performance Assurance previously provided by or credited to the Posting Party for the benefit of the Beneficiary Party and not released as of the time the Posting Party made the demand, plus
the Collateral Threshold applicable to the Posting Party. (y) is
the Termination Payment, if any, that would be owed to the Beneficiary Party if the Posting Party were the Defaulting Party under Section 22.1 of the WSPP Agreement, plus
the damages, if any, solely under Section 21.3 of the WSPP Agreement that would be owed to the Beneficiary Party if the Posting Party were the Non-Performing Party, plus
any further and additional amounts due for rendered performance by the Beneficiary Party to the Posting Party under any WSPP Agreement transactions, whether or not invoiced or due.

The foregoing notwithstanding, if under this Collateral Annex each Party has an obligation to maintain Performance Assurance with respect to the other Party, the Parties’ obligations to transfer Performance Assurance hereunder, including obligations to post Performance Assurance under Section 4 of this Collateral Annex, at any time shall be determined on a net basis, and the Party with a net positive transfer obligation shall transfer Performance Assurance under this Section 5(a) in such amount.
(b) Return of All Performance Assurance. No later than one (1) Business Day after the last to occur of (i) the Termination Date, and (ii) (A) completion of all outstanding transactions between the Parties under the WSPP Agreement or (B) if all such outstanding transactions have not been completed, then payment by the Posting Party of all amounts due to the Beneficiary Party under Sections 21

9 and 22 of the WSPP Agreement with respect to uncompleted transactions, the Beneficiary Party shall return all outstanding Performance Assurance to the Posting Party less any amounts applied to the satisfaction of any of the Posting Party’s Obligations.
(c) Substitution of Performance Assurance. Unless (i) an Event of Default has occurred and is continuing where the Posting Party is the Defaulting Party, (ii) a Potential Event of Default exists where the Posting Party is the potentially Defaulting Party, or (iii) an Early Termination has occurred or been designated with respect to the Posting Party pursuant to which the Posting Party has not satisfied all Obligations, the Posting Party may substitute Performance Assurance for existing Performance Assurance of equal value. The Posting Party must give notice of the substitution to the Beneficiary Party two (2) Business Days before the substitution is intended to occur no later than 5 p.m.

New York time. The notice must specify whether the substitute Performance Assurance is Cash or a Letter of Credit and if the latter it shall include a draft thereof. If the substitute Performance Assurance is Cash or a Letter of Credit (in form consistent with this Collateral Annex), then the Posting Party may effect the substitution no earlier than two, and no later than five (5), Business Days after giving such notice. If the substitute Performance Assurance is not Cash or a Letter of Credit (in form consistent with this Collateral Annex), the substitution shall not be made unless the Beneficiary Party consents in writing thereto. No later than one Business Day after the Beneficiary Party receives substitute Performance Assurance in accordance with this Section, the Beneficiary Party shall transfer the Performance Assurance that has been replaced to the Posting Party. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, no such substitution shall be permitted unless after giving effect to such substitution, the value of such substitute Performance Assurance shall equal the greater of the Posting Party’s Collateral Requirement or the Posting Party’s Minimum Transfer Amount. The substituted Performance Assurance shall be subject to and governed by the terms and conditions of this Collateral Annex.

6. Administration of Performance Assurance.
(a) Cash held by Beneficiary Party.
(i) Conditions Under Which A Beneficiary Party Is Entitled To Hold Cash. A Beneficiary Party shall be an “Eligible Beneficiary Party” entitled to hold Performance Assurance in the form of Cash if, and for only so long as, all of the following conditions (w), (x), (y) and (z) are satisfied:
(w) The Parties have agreed in the Cover Sheet Elections or otherwise in writing that the Beneficiary Party may hold Performance Assurance in the form of Cash.
(x) If the Cover Sheet Elections permit the Posting Party unilaterally to rescind the Parties’ agreement that the Beneficiary Party shall be entitled to hold Performance Assurance in the form of Cash, the Posting Party has not rescinded such agreement.
(y) A Material Adverse Change with respect to the Beneficiary Party has

10 not occurred.
(z) The Beneficiary Party, the Posting Party, and a Custodial Bank have executed a Deposit Account Agreement, provided, that the Beneficiary Party is not required to place any Performance Assurance in the form of Cash in the Custodial Bank under such agreement except in the event of a cessation of Eligible Beneficiary Party status under Section 6(a)(iv) of this Collateral Annex.
(ii) Eligible Beneficiary Party’s Use Of Cash. An Eligible Beneficiary Party shall be entitled to hold Performance Assurance in the form of Cash in any accounts it holds in the United States, and, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in UCC § 9-207, an Eligible Beneficiary Party shall also have the right to sell, pledge, rehypothecate, assign, invest, use, commingle or otherwise use in its business any Cash that it holds as Performance Assurance hereunder, free from any claim or right of any nature whatsoever of the Posting Party except for the Posting Party’s rights under (A) Section 5(a), (b), and (c) of this Collateral Annex (reduction, return or substitution of Performance Assurance), (B) Section 6(a)(iv) (cessation of Eligible Beneficiary Party status), and (C) Section 8 of this Collateral Annex (Event of Default or Early Termination). (iii) Appointment of Agent. The Eligible Beneficiary Party may, but is not required, to appoint an agent to hold Performance Assurance in the form of Cash on its behalf and to receive additional Performance Assurance. In the event an Eligible Beneficiary Party makes such an appointment, it must give notice to the Posting Party including the identity and address of the agent, no later than one (1) Business Day after the deposit. Upon the receipt of such notice, the Posting Party’s obligations to make any transfer will be discharged by making the transfer to the agent. The Eligible Beneficiary Party may use Cash held by an agent in accordance with Section 6(a)(ii) of this Collateral Annex, subject to the Posting Party’s rights referred to therein.
(iv) Cessation Of Eligible Beneficiary Party Status. The Beneficiary Party shall cease to be an Eligible Beneficiary Party immediately upon the failure of any one of conditions (w), (x), (y) or (z) of Section 6(a)(i) at any time (each a “Downgrade Event”), and thereafter such Beneficiary Party shall be considered a “Downgraded Party.” Failure of (x) shall occur upon the Posting Party’s giving notice to the Beneficiary Party of its rescission of the Parties’ agreement that the Beneficiary Party shall be entitled to hold Performance Assurance in the form of Cash. A Downgraded Party shall transfer, or cause its agent to transfer, no later than the close of the next Business Day following the occurrence of the Downgrade Event, all Performance Assurance in the form of Cash to the Custodial Bank and all such Cash shall be maintained in a Deposit Account in accordance with Section 6(b) of this Collateral Annex and the terms and conditions of the Deposit Account Agreement. Upon the occurrence of a Downgrade Event, Section 6(a)(ii) concerning the Eligible Beneficiary Party’s rights to use Cash shall cease to apply. After the occurrence of a Downgrade Event, a Downgraded Party shall not become an Eligible Beneficiary Party except upon the written agreement of the Posting Party. Nothing in this Section 6(a) shall diminish the Posting Party’s rights under Section 8 of this Collateral Annex.

11 (v) Interest Payments On Cash. So long as no (i) Event of Default has occurred and is continuing where the Posting Party is the Defaulting Party or (ii) no Early Termination has occurred or been designated with respect to the Posting Party pursuant to which the Posting Party has not satisfied all of its Obligations, then, the Eligible Beneficiary Party will pay to the Posting Party, in lieu of any other amounts paid, earned, or deemed to have been paid or earned, with respect to such Cash (all of which may be retained by the Eligible Beneficiary Party), interest in amounts calculated in accordance with the Interest Rate. The Posting Party shall submit an invoice to the Beneficiary Party on the first Business Day of each month for interest due for the prior month, and shall set forth such calculation therein. The Eligible Beneficiary Party shall make payment thereof of any interest due to the Posting Party by the later of the next Business Day after submittal of the invoice. The Beneficiary Party shall determine in its sole discretion whether the method of payment shall be (a) an increase in the Performance Assurance credited to the Posting Party in an amount equal to any interest due, or (b) a transfer of funds to the Posting Party equal to any interest due.
(b) Cash Held By Custodial Bank.
(i) Conditions Under Which Cash Shall Be Held By Custodial Bank. The Custodial Bank shall hold Performance Assurance in the form of Cash if either of the following conditions is satisfied:
(x) The Parties have not agreed in the Cover Sheet Elections or otherwise in writing that the Beneficiary Party may hold Performance Assurance in the form of Cash.
(y) A Downgrade Event has occurred such that an Eligible Beneficiary Party has become a Downgraded Party.
(ii) Use Of Cash. In the event the Custodial Bank holds Performance Assurance in the form of Cash under this Section 6(b), the Beneficiary Party shall have no right to use or receive Performance Assurance in the form of Cash held by the Custodial Bank except, if an Event of Default has occurred where the Posting Party is the Defaulting Party or an Early Termination has occurred or been designated with respect to such Posting Party for which the Posting Party has not satisfied Obligations, then the Beneficiary Party shall have a right to receive Cash in payment of the Posting Party’s Obligations. The Custodial Bank shall hold and disburse Performance Assurance in the form of Cash in accordance with the terms of this Collateral Annex and for the security interest and benefit of the Beneficiary Party and, subject solely to such security interest, for the ownership of the Posting Party. Performance Assurance in the form of Cash shall be held in a Deposit Account (A) designated for the ownership of the Posting Party, (B) controlled by the Beneficiary Party in accordance with the terms of the Deposit Account Agreement, and (C) designated for the security interest and benefit of the Beneficiary Party under this Collateral Annex and the Deposit Account Agreement.
(iii) Interest Payments On Cash. So long as no (i) Event of Default has occurred and is continuing where the Posting Party is the Defaulting Party and (ii)

12 no Early Termination has occurred or been designated with respect to such Posting Party for which the Posting Party has not satisfied Obligations, then, the Custodial Bank, on behalf of the Beneficiary Party will pay to the Posting Party, in lieu of any other amounts paid, earned, or deemed to have been paid or earned, with respect to such Cash, interest in amounts calculated and paid in accordance with the Deposit Account Agreement or otherwise agreed by the Custodial Bank and Parties in writing. Payment shall be made by increasing the Performance Assurance credited to the Posting Party in an amount equal to any interest due, unless the Beneficiary Party instructs the Custodial Bank to make payment by transferring funds to the Posting Party in an amount equal to any interest due. (iv) Other Conditions. All terms and conditions stated in the Deposit Account Agreement as they apply to the Parties are incorporated into this Collateral Annex.
(c) Letters of Credit. Performance Assurance provided in the form of a Letter of Credit shall be subject to the following provisions, provided, that nothing in this Section 6(c) is intended to modify any terms and conditions contained in any Letter of Credit that apply to draws thereon and it is recognized that the Parties may agree to additional terms and conditions not stated herein. (i) The Posting Party shall maintain for the benefit of the Beneficiary Party any Letter of Credit provided as Performance Assurance in accordance with Section 4 of this Collateral Annex. The Posting Party shall (a) renew or cause the renewal of each outstanding Letter of Credit not less than thirty (30) days prior to its expiration in accordance with the terms contained in the applicable Letter of Credit, (b) if the LC Issuer has indicated its intent not to renew such Letter of Credit, provide either (1) a Letter of Credit issued by a Qualified Institution in the same face amount and on substantially the same terms as the outstanding Letter of Credit (each, a “Replacement Letter of Credit”) or (2) Performance Assurance in the form of Cash equal to the face amount of such outstanding Letter of Credit in a form acceptable to the Beneficiary Party (“Replacement Performance Assurance”), in each case at least twenty (20) days prior to the expiration of the applicable Letter of Credit, and (c) if the LC Issuer shall fail to honor the Beneficiary Party’s request to draw on an outstanding Letter of Credit in accordance with the terms thereof, provide for the benefit of the Beneficiary Party either (1) a Replacement Letter of Credit or (2) Replacement Performance Assurance, in each case within two (2) Business Days after such refusal, provided, that, as a result of the Posting Party’s failure to perform in accordance with (a), (b), or (c) above, the Posting Party’s Collateral Requirement would be greater than zero. The foregoing notwithstanding, the Beneficiary Party may reject a Replacement Letter of Credit that conforms to the requirements of this Section if in the Beneficiary Party’s sole discretion acceptance of additional credit from the applicable LC Issuer would be an unacceptable credit risk due to other commitments it had accepted from such LC Issuer, provided, that in the event of such rejection, the Beneficiary Party shall pay any costs incurred by the Posting Party in obtaining a Replacement Letter of Credit from a different LC Issuer. Rejection of a Replacement Letter of Credit under the immediately prior sentence shall not relieve a Posting Party of its obligations to maintain adequate Performance Assurance at all times under this Collateral Annex.

13 (ii) Upon the occurrence of a Letter of Credit Default, the Posting Party shall deliver to the Beneficiary Party either a Replacement Letter of Credit or Replacement Performance Assurance, in each case on or before the first Business Day after the occurrence thereof (or the fifth (5th) Business Day after the occurrence thereof if only clause (a) under the definition of Letter of Credit Default applies), in such amounts that on the day such Replacement Letter of Credit or Replacement Performance Assurance is provided the Collateral Requirement is zero.
(iii) Upon or at any time after the occurrence of an Event of Default that is continuing where the Posting Party is the Defaulting Party, or if an Early Termination has occurred or been designated with respect to the Posting Party pursuant to which the Posting Party has not satisfied all of its Obligations, then the Beneficiary Party may draw on the entire, undrawn portion of any outstanding Letter of Credit in accordance with its terms. Notwithstanding the Beneficiary Party’s receipt of Cash under the Letter of Credit, the Posting Party shall remain liable for any failure to transfer sufficient Performance Assurance and for any Obligations owing to the Beneficiary Party and remaining unpaid after the application of the amounts so drawn by the Beneficiary Party. (iv) In all cases, the costs and expenses (including but not limited to the reasonable costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees of the Beneficiary Party) of establishing, renewing, substituting, reissuing, canceling, and increasing the face amount of (as the case may be) a Letter of Credit shall be paid by the Posting Party, or if paid by the Beneficiary Party, promptly reimbursed by the Posting Party following the Beneficiary Party’s demand for reimbursement. (d) Performance Assurance in Forms Other than Cash or Letters of Credit. The Parties may agree that a Party may provide Performance Assurance in forms other than Cash or Letters of Credit, and may agree to additional terms and conditions respecting such Performance Assurance.
(e) Care of Performance Assurance. Except for duties to comply with all requirements concerning Performance Assurance stated herein, the Beneficiary Party shall have no duty as to any Performance Assurance in its possession or control or in the possession or control of any Custodial Bank or any income thereon or as to the preservation of rights against prior parties or any other rights pertaining thereto. The Eligible Beneficiary Party shall not be liable or responsible for any diminution in the value of Performance Assurance by reason of the act or omission of a Custodial Bank. Unless held by a Custodial Bank and except as required under Section 6(a)(iv) of this Collateral Annex, the Beneficiary Party, or its agent appointed under Section 6(a)(iii), shall at all times retain possession or control of Performance Assurance delivered to it. To the extent if any that this Section 6(e) is inconsistent with UCC § 9-207, this Section 6(e) shall control.

7. Beneficiary Party’s Exercise of Rights Concerning Performance Assurance. (a) In the event that (x) an Event of Default has occurred and is continuing where the Posting Party is the Defaulting Party or (y) an Early Termination has occurred or been designated with respect to the Posting Party for which the Posting Party has not satisfied all of its Obligations, the Beneficiary Party may exercise any one

14 or more of the rights and remedies provided under the WSPP Agreement, under this Collateral Annex or as otherwise may be available under applicable law.

Without limiting the foregoing, if at any time (x) or (y) has occurred, then the Beneficiary Party may, in its sole discretion, declare all Obligations immediately due and payable without presentment, demand, notice, protest or other formalities of any kind (all of which are hereby expressly waived by the Posting Party) and exercise any one or more of the following rights and remedies:
(i) All rights and remedies available to the Beneficiary Party under UCC Article 9 or the uniform commercial code of any jurisdiction in which the Performance Assurance is being held and any other applicable jurisdiction and other applicable laws with respect to the preservation of or foreclosure upon collateral.
(ii) The right to set off any Performance Assurance held by or for the benefit of the Beneficiary Party against and in satisfaction of any amount payable by the Posting Party in respect of any of its Obligations.
(iii) The right to draw the full undrawn face amount of each outstanding Letter of Credit issued for its benefit.
(iv) The right to instruct the Custodial Bank to transfer all Performance Assurance held in a Deposit Account to an account of the Beneficiary Party or otherwise to or for the benefit of the Beneficiary Party. (v) The right to liquidate any Performance Assurance held by or for the benefit of the Beneficiary Party, free from any claim or right of any nature whatsoever of the Posting Party, and to apply the proceeds received following the exercise of the rights and remedies set forth above as follows (A) first, to the payment of (1) all costs and expenses relating to the sale of any Performance Assurance and collection of amounts owing hereunder, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and disbursements and the just compensation of the Beneficiary Party for services rendered in connection therewith or in connection with any proceeding to sell if a sale is not completed, and (2) all charges, expenses and advances incurred or made by the Beneficiary Party in order to protect the lien provided under this Collateral Annex; (B) second, to the payment in full of all of the Obligations owed to the Beneficiary Party hereunder in such order as the Beneficiary Party may elect; and (C) third, the balance, if any, shall be paid to the Posting Party.
(b) The Posting Party hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints the Beneficiary Party and any officer or agent thereof, with full power of substitution, as the Posting Party’s true and lawful attorney-in-fact (which appointment shall be coupled with an interest) with full irrevocable power and authority to act in the name, place and stead of the Posting Party or in the Beneficiary Party’s own name, from time to time in the Beneficiary Party’s discretion, solely for the purpose of taking any and all action and executing and delivering any and all documents or instruments which may be necessary or desirable to accomplish the purposes of Section 7(a). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Beneficiary

15 Party shall not be obligated to exercise any right or duty as attorney-in-fact, and shall have no duties to the Posting party in connection therewith. (c) The Posting Party shall in all events remain liable to the Beneficiary Party for any amount payable by the Posting Party in respect of any of its Obligations remaining unpaid after any such liquidation, application and set off and the Beneficiary Party shall have the right to proceed against the Posting Party for any such deficiency.

8. Posting Party’s Exercise of Rights Concerning Performance Assurance.

If at any time (a) an Event of Default has occurred and is continuing where the Beneficiary Party is the Defaulting Party, or (b) an Early Termination has occurred or been designated with respect to the Beneficiary Party for which the Beneficiary Party has not satisfied all of its Obligations, then:
(i) on the day of such occurrence, the Beneficiary Party will be obligated to transfer all Performance Assurance (including any Letter of Credit) and interest in amounts calculated in accordance with the Interest Rate, if any, to the Posting Party;
(ii) the Posting Party may do any one or more of the following: (a) exercise any of the rights and remedies of a pledgor with respect to the Performance Assurance, including any such rights and remedies under law then in effect; (b) to the extent that Performance Assurance is not transferred to the Posting Party as required in (i) above, setoff amounts payable to the Beneficiary Party against the Performance Assurance (other than Letters of Credit) held by the Beneficiary Party or to the extent its rights to setoff are not exercised, withhold payment of any remaining amounts payable by the Posting Party, up to the value of any Performance Assurance that has not been so transferred, until the Performance Assurance is transferred to the Posting Party; (c) exercise rights and remedies available to the Posting Party under the terms of any Letter of Credit; and (d) exercise any applicable rights and remedies available to the Posting Party under the WSPP Agreement; and
(iii) the Beneficiary Party shall be prohibited from drawing on any Letter of Credit that has been posted by the Posting Party for its benefit.

9. Disputed Calculations.

If a Party shall dispute the Collateral Requirement determined by the Beneficiary Party or the Excess Performance Assurance determined by the Posting Party and such dispute relates to the Termination Payment calculated by the other Party under Section

22.1 of the WSPP Agreement or damages calculation under Section 21.3 of the WSPP Agreement, then the Party contesting the Termination Payment calculation or damages calculation shall:
(i) notify the other Party of the existence and nature of the dispute not later than 4 p.m. New York Time on the same day a Party has demanded additional Performance Assurance under Section 4 of this Collateral Annex or the return of Excess Performance Assurance under Section 5 of this Collateral Annex;

16 (ii) if a Beneficiary Party has demanded that the Posting Party provide Performance Assurance under Section 4, the Posting Party shall provide Performance Assurance to satisfy its Collateral Requirement based upon the Beneficiary Party’s estimate, made in good faith and in a commercially reasonable manner, of the Termination Payment if the Posting Party were the Defaulting Party under Section 22.1 of the WSPP Agreement and the damages under Section 21.3 of the WSPP Agreement if the Posting Party were required to pay such damages; and
(iii) if a Posting Party has demanded that the Beneficiary Party return Excess Performance Assurance under Section 5, the Beneficiary Party shall return Excess Performance Assurance based upon the Beneficiary Party’s estimate, made in good faith and in a commercially a commercially reasonable manner, of the Termination Payment if the Posting Party were the Defaulting Party under Section 22.1 of the WSPP Agreement and the damages under Section 21.3 of the WSPP Agreement if the Posting Party were required to pay such damages.

In all such cases, the Parties thereafter shall promptly negotiate in good faith in order to reconcile the dispute or a method for resolving the dispute. If the Parties fail to resolve the dispute on or before the first Business Day following the date that the demand is made by the Party contesting the Termination Payment calculation or the damages calculation, then such Termination Payment or damages calculation shall be determined based upon quotations from Dealers in energy contracts. Each Party may obtain up to a maximum of four (4) quotations which must be provided to the other Party on the same day as the demand, if the demand is made no later than 2 p.m. New York Time, or the next Business Day, if the demand is made after 2 p.m. Eastern Time. These quotations shall reflect transacted prices in comparable contracts. The Termination Payment or damages calculation shall equal a simple average of the quotations obtained and provided by the Parties consistent with the provisions of this Section 9. Each Party providing quotations to the other Party also shall identify to the other Party the Dealer(s) who provided each of the quotations to allow verification. Performance Assurance shall thereupon be provided, or Excess Performance returned, as the case may be, on the next Business Day after provision to the Posting Party of the recalculation, in accordance with the results of such recalculation. The results of this process shall be enforceable in a court of law unless fraudulent.

10. Covenants; Representations and Warranties; Miscellaneous. (a) The Posting Party will execute and deliver to the Beneficiary Party (and to the extent permitted by applicable law, the Posting Party hereby authorizes the Beneficiary Party to execute and deliver, in the name of the Posting Party or otherwise) such financing statements, assignments and other documents and do such other things relating to the Performance Assurance and the security interest granted under this Collateral Annex including any action the Beneficiary Party may deem necessary or appropriate to perfect or maintain perfection of its security interest in the Performance Assurance, and the Posting Party shall pay all costs relating to its delivery of Performance Assurance and the maintenance and perfection of the security interest therein.
(b) On each day on which Performance Assurance is held under this Collateral Annex by the Beneficiary Party and/or its agent, or by the Custodial Bank under

17 the Deposit Account Agreement, the Posting Party hereby represents and warrants that:
(i) the Posting Party has good and marketable title to and is the sole owner of such Performance Assurance, and the execution, delivery and performance of the covenants and agreements of this Collateral Annex, do not result in the creation or imposition of any lien or security interest upon any of its assets or properties, including, without limitation, the Performance Assurance, other than the security interests and liens created under the WSPP Agreement and this Collateral Annex;
(ii) upon the transfer of Performance Assurance by the Posting Party to the Beneficiary Party, its agent, or the Custodial Bank for the benefit of the Beneficiary Party, the Beneficiary Party shall have a valid and perfected first priority continuing security interest therein, free of any liens, security interests, claims or encumbrances, except those liens, security interests, claims or encumbrances arising by operation of law that are given priority over a perfected security interest;
(iii) it is not and will not become a Party to or otherwise be bound by any agreement, other than the WSPP Agreement and this Collateral Annex, or amendments thereto, which restricts in any manner the rights of any present or future holder of any of the Performance Assurance with respect hereto; and (iv) No approval or authorization by, and no filing with or consent of, any federal, state, local, municipal or other government agency, department or regulatory authority is required either (A) for the grant by the Posting Party of the liens granted hereby or for the execution, delivery or performance of this Collateral Annex by the Posting Party or (B) for the perfection (except for filing of any financing statements in the jurisdictions identified in writing by the Posting Party) of the liens created hereby or the exercise by the Beneficiary Party of the rights and remedies hereunder.
(c) This Collateral Annex has been and is made solely for the benefit of the Parties and their permitted successors and assigns, and no other person, partnership, association, corporation, or other entity shall acquire or have any right thereunder or by virtue of this Collateral Annex.
(d) Each Party represents and warrants to the other Party that (i) it has all requisite power and authority to execute and deliver this Collateral Annex, to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby and to perform its respective obligations hereunder; (ii) it has taken all necessary action to authorize the execution, delivery and performance of this Collateral Annex and (iii) this Collateral Annex has been duly executed and delivered and, when executed and delivered by the other Party, will constitute the legal, valid and binding obligation of such Party enforceable against it in accordance with its terms except as such enforcement may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, moratorium or similar laws affecting the rights of creditors generally or by general equitable principles (regardless of whether enforcement is sought in a proceeding in equity or at law). Each Party, at the time of execution, shall provide the other Party with evidence of such authority reasonably acceptable to the other Party, including, if the Collateral

18 Annex is executed by an officer, a certificate of incumbency, and, if requested by the other Party, a written opinion of counsel (the opinion of a Party’s in-house counsel shall suffice), in such form as is reasonably acceptable to the other Party, that person who executed this Collateral Annex was duly authorized in accordance with all actions requisite to establish such authority. (e) As of the date a Party executes this Collateral Annex, the Cover Sheet Elections, Deposit Account Agreement, or Security Agreement, or any amendment thereto, such Party is a member in good standing of WSPP, Inc.
(f) Section 34 of the WSPP Agreement is inapplicable to any disputes concerning the enforcement of this Collateral Annex or the rights and obligations set forth herein concerning Performance Assurance. In the event litigation is commenced by either Party to enforce this Collateral Annex or collect any amounts required to be paid, provided or transferred hereunder, each Party agrees to pay the other Party for all reasonable attorneys fees, disbursements, and court costs incurred by the prevailing Party in such litigation.
(g) No delay or forbearance by any Party or its agents in exercising any right, power, privilege, or remedy accruing to such Party upon the occurrence of any breach or default by the other Party under this Collateral Annex, and no course of dealing between the Parties, shall impair any such right, power or remedy of the nondefaulting Party, nor shall it be construed to be a waiver of any such breach or default, or an acquiescence therein, or of any similar breach or default thereafter occurring, nor shall any waiver of any single breach or default be deemed a waiver of any other breach or default theretofore or thereafter occurring. Any waiver, permit, consent or approval of any kind or character on the part of a Party of any such breach or default under this Collateral Annex, or any waiver on the part of any non-defaulting Party hereto of any provision or condition of this Collateral Annex, must be in writing and shall be effective only to the extent specifically set forth in such writing. This Collateral Annex may be amended only by a document executed by the Parties.
(h) Each demand, notice, consent, agreement, approval or other communication required or permitted to be given from one Party to the other Party under this Collateral Annex shall be provided in writing (unless expressly provided otherwise) and shall be submitted by recognized overnight courier service or telefacsimile addressed to the recipient Party at its address or telefacsimile number set forth in Part VIII of the Cover Sheet Elections or as changed by notice to the other Party. All such notices, requests, demands, approvals and other communications shall be deemed to have been duly given, received and effective when: (a) received if personally delivered; (b) on the day transmitted (unless transmitted after 5:00 p.m. at the place of receipt or on a day that is not a Business Day, in which case it shall be deemed received on the next Business Day), if transmitted by facsimile transmission and the sender's facsimile machine has received the correct answerback of the addressee and confirmation of uninterrupted transmission by a transmission report or the recipient confirming by telephone to sender that he has received the facsimile message; (c) the day immediately following the day it is sent, if sent for next day delivery to a domestic address by a nationally-recognized overnight courier or delivery service; (d) on the day of receipt, if sent by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested;

19 and (e) on the date actually received, if sent or delivered by any other means; provided, that any notice, demand, request or other communication made or delivered in connection with an alleged breach or default hereunder (including an Event of Default) shall only be delivered personally or by a nationally-recognized overnight courier or delivery service. Whenever this Collateral Annex provides that a demand, notice, consent, agreement, approval or other communication shall be provided in “writing” or shall be provided in “written” form, such demand, notice, consent, agreement, approval or other communication shall only be effective hereunder if provided by a manually signed original, photocopy or telefacsimile copy from the Party or Parties to be bound thereby. (i) The headings in this Collateral Annex are for convenience of reference only, and shall not affect the meaning or construction of any provision thereof. (j) This Collateral Annex shall be governed by, and construed and interpreted in accordance with, the laws of the State of Utah, except to the extent that the perfection, the effect of perfection or nonperfection and the priority of the security interest granted hereunder, or remedies hereunder, are governed by provisions of the UCC, including but not limited to UCC §§ 9-301, 9-303, 9-304, 9-305, 9- 306 and 9-307, that may call for the application of the laws of jurisdictions other than the State of Utah.
(k) This Collateral Annex may be executed in one or more counterparts, all of which, when taken together, shall constitute one and the same instrument and each of the Parties hereto may execute this Collateral Annex by signing any such counterpart.

20 IN WITNESS HEREOF, the Parties have caused this Collateral Annex to be duly executed effective as of the date first written above.

Party A Party B
City of Roseville NRG Business Marketing LLC
_______________________________ _______________________________ [Sign here] [Sign here]
_______________________________ _______________________________ [Print name] [Print name]
_______________________________ _______________________________ Title Title
Date: __________________________ Date: __________________________