Roseville City Council
May 6, 2026

R O S E V I L L E H I G H S C H O O L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

R O S E V I L L E J O I N T U N I O N H I G H S C H O O L D I S T R I C T

3. Environmental Analysis
April 2024 Page 77
As shown in Table 11, on-site construction-related noise levels would exceed the 80 dBA Leq threshold by 1 dBA during utility trenching activities at the nearest sensitive receptors west of the project site. As stated in Section 9.24.030, Exemptions, of the Roseville Municipal Code, all construction equipment shall be fitted with factory installed muffling devices. A study prepared for the US Department of Transportation found that improved muffling will generally lower the overall noise level by 1 to 3 dBA and in cases where a particular piece of equipment either does not have or has a very poor muffler, the application of a good muffler will reduce the overall noise by 6 to 12 dBA (Toth 1979). The construction equipment modeled is assumed to not have any mufflers or sound-attenuating devices installed. Therefore, the estimated noise levels are conservative.

The project would comply with Section 9.24.030 of the Municipal Code and install factory muffling devices.

By compliance, construction noise would be reduced by at least 6 dBA. Therefore, construction noise levels would be reduced to 75 dBA or less and impacts would be less than significant.

Operational Noise
Mobile Noise
A project will normally have a significant effect on the environment related to noise if it will substantially increase the ambient noise levels at adjoining areas. Most people can detect changes in sound levels of approximately 3 dBA under normal, quiet conditions, and changes of 1 to 3 dBA are detectable under quiet, controlled conditions. Changes of less than 1 dBA are usually indiscernible. A change of 5 dBA is readily discernible to most people in an exterior environment. Based on this, the following thresholds of significance, similar to those recommended by the Federal Aviation Administration, are used to assess traffic noise impacts at sensitive receptor locations. A significant impact would occur if traffic noise increase would exceed:
▪ 1.5 dBA in ambient noise environments of 65 dBA CNEL and higher. ▪ 3 dBA in ambient noise environments of 60 to 64 dBA CNEL. ▪ 5 dBA in ambient noise environments of less than 60 dBA CNEL.

As described in Section 3.17, Transportation, the proposed project would not generate a net increase in vehicle trips to and from the high school campus when compared to baseline conditions. Furthermore, the proposed project would relocate the pool that would be demolished in Phase 1 of construction with the replacement of the multi-story classroom, thereby removing a source of outdoor noise. The relocation of the pool would potentially decrease the number of users for the future project site. Therefore, operational noise from the proposed project would result in less-than-significant impacts.

Project-Related Stationary Noise
Mechanical Equipment Noise
Though Section 9.24.030 of the municipal code exempts air conditioning noise and noise from similar equipment, this is only exempt when associated with residential uses. Therefore, noise from potential heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) equipment associated with the new school building is analyzed. Typical HVAC equipment generates noise levels ranging up to 72 dBA at a distance of 3 feet. To be conservative, it is assumed that HVAC equipment would be installed at the nearest edge of the building to sensitive receptors.

The nearest residential property line to the new proposed building is approximately 50 feet to the west across Addendum Attachment 2

R O S E V I L L E H I G H S C H O O L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

R O S E V I L L E J O I N T U N I O N H I G H S C H O O L D I S T R I C T

3. Environmental Analysis

Campo Street. At this distance, noise levels would attenuate to 48 dBA. HVAC noise levels would potentially exceed the City’s nighttime noise standards of 45 dBA for stationary noise sources. Therefore, impacts would be potentially significant. However, with Mitigation Measure NOI-1, HVAC noise would be reduced to a lessthan-significant impact.

Mitigation Measure
NOI-1 Mechanical equipment shall be selected and designed to meet the City’s noise limits of 50 dBA Leq and 45 dBA Leq at residential uses during daytime and nighttime, respectively. A qualified acoustical consultant shall be retained to assist in selecting and reviewing mechanical noise specification to determine noise code compliance and/or identify specific noise reduction measures necessary to reduce mechanical noise to comply with the City’s noise code. Noise reduction measures could include, but are not limited to:
▪ Selection of equipment that emits noise levels of 45 dBA or less at a distance of 50 feet. ▪ Installation of noise dampening techniques, such as enclosures and parapet walls, to block the line-of-sight between the noise source and the nearest receptors to reduce noise levels to 45 dBA or less.
b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation. Following is a discussion of the project’s temporary and operational vibration impacts as a result of the project’s construction and operational phases.

Operational Vibration
Project operation would not include any substantial long-term vibration sources. Therefore, no significant vibration impacts would occur.

Construction Vibration
Construction operations can generate varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the construction procedures and equipment. Operation of construction equipment generates vibrations that spread through the ground and diminish with distance from the source. The effect on buildings in the vicinity of the construction site varies depending on soil type, ground strata, and receptor-building construction. The effects from vibration can range from no perceptible effects at the lowest vibration levels, to low rumbling sounds and perceptible vibrations at moderate levels, to slight structural damage at the highest levels. Vibration from construction activities rarely reaches the levels that can damage structures.

For reference, a vibration level of 0.20 in/sec PPV is used as the limit for non-engineered timber and masonry buildings, which would conservatively apply to the surrounding structures (FTA 2018). To determine potential vibration-induced architectural damage, the distance from the vibration source (construction equipment) to the vibration-sensitive receptors, which include nearby residences, are measured from the edge of the construction site to the nearest building façade. Vibration-induced architectural damage is assessed in terms of peak velocity (PPV). As shown in Table 12, PPV levels for typical construction equipment would exceed the 0.20 in/sec PPV Addendum Attachment 2

R O S E V I L L E H I G H S C H O O L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

R O S E V I L L E J O I N T U N I O N H I G H S C H O O L D I S T R I C T

3. Environmental Analysis
April 2024 Page 79
standard at the nearest vibration-sensitive receptors to the west and south of the project site as construction equipment could be located approximately 25 feet away from the façade of the nearby residences.

Paving and grading activities could occur within 25 feet of residences to the west along Alta Vista Avenue. As shown in Table 12, vibration from a vibratory roller could exceed 0.20 in/sec PPV at 25 feet along Alta Vista Avenue. Therefore, impacts would be potentially significant. However, with implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-2, potential vibration damage impacts would be reduced to less than significant.

Table 12 Vibration Damage Levels for Typical Construction Equipment Equipment
PPV (in/sec)
Reference
Vibration levels at
25 feet
Residences along
Alta Vista Avenue
at 25 feet
Residences to the
west along Campo
Street at 50 feet
Residences to the
northwest along Sierra
Boulevard at 30 feet
Residences South
along Coronado
Avenue at 50 feet
Vibratory Roller1 0.210 0.210 0.074 0.160 0.074
Large Bulldozer1 0.089 0.089 0.031 0.068 0.031
Loaded Trucks1 0.076 0.089 0.031 0.068 0.031
Jackhammer1 0.035 0.076 0.027 0.058 0.027
Small Bulldozer (100
Horsepower or less)1

0.003 0.035 0.012 0.027 0.012
1 Source FTA 2018.

Bold = Exceeds FTA’s 0.20 in/sec PPV vibration threshold.

Implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-2 would reduce project-related construction vibration impacts to the surrounding residential receptors to a less-than-significant level. Specifically, use of a roller is estimated to generate vibration levels of approximately 0.21 in/sec PPV at a distance of 25 feet (FTA 2018). Earthwork equipment used for grading shall be limited to equipment with 100 horsepower or less, as detailed below.

Mitigation Measure
NOI-2 Vibratory compaction for paving that is within 25 feet of any surrounding residential structure shall use a static roller in lieu of a vibratory roller. At a distance greater than 25 feet, a vibratory roller would no longer exceed 0.20 inches per second (in/sec) peak particle velocity (PPV) and would be allowed for use. Therefore, a static roller shall be used within 25 feet where levels would be reduced to 0.20 in/sec PPV or less and mitigate vibration damage. Grading, earthwork, and demolition activities within 15 feet of adjacent residential structures shall be conducted with off-road equipment that is limited to 100 horsepower or less. c) For a project in the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact. The nearest airport to the project site is Sacramento McClellan Airport, approximately 7.9 miles southwest. The project would not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive aircraft noise levels. Therefore, no impact would occur, and no mitigation measures are necessary.

Addendum Attachment 2

R O S E V I L L E H I G H S C H O O L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

R O S E V I L L E J O I N T U N I O N H I G H S C H O O L D I S T R I C T

3. Environmental Analysis

POPULATION AND HOUSING
Would the project:
a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
No Impact. The proposed project would result in no increase in student enrollment. It is expected that the students that would fill the new classrooms would be existing residents living in the District’s service boundary, and the proposed project would not directly increase population growth in the area. No construction of homes or businesses is proposed, nor is extension of roads or other infrastructure required. Project implementation would not induce population growth and no impact would occur. b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
No Impact. Project construction would be restricted to the existing campus, and no housing would be displaced or necessitate replacement housing. No impact would occur.

PUBLIC SERVICES
Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services:
a) Fire protection?
Less Than Significant Impact. Fire prevention, fire protection, and emergency medical services in the project area are provided by the Roseville Fire Department, which has eight fire stations in the city. The nearest fire station to the project site is Fire Station 1 at 80 Lincoln Street, 0.6 miles to the southwest. The proposed project may cause a very slight increase in demands for fire protection and emergency medical service. The proposed project would not increase the number of students on-site, and the site would continue to operate as a school.

Both the City Fire Marshal and DSA would be required to approve fire access around the site. However, considering the existing firefighting resources available in and near the city, project impacts on fire protection and emergency services (including response times) are not expected to occur. Additionally, in the event of an emergency at the project site that required more resources than Fire Station 1 could provide, the Roseville Fire Department would direct resources to the site from other city stations nearby and, if needed, request assistance from other nearby fire departments. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are necessary.

Addendum Attachment 2

R O S E V I L L E H I G H S C H O O L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

R O S E V I L L E J O I N T U N I O N H I G H S C H O O L D I S T R I C T

3. Environmental Analysis
April 2024 Page 81
b) Police protection?
Less Than Significant Impact. Law enforcement services in the area are provided by the Roseville Police Department. The Roseville Police Department is headquartered at 1051 Junction Boulevard, approximately one mile to the west. The proposed project may cause a very slight increase in demands for police services during construction due to possible trespass, theft, and/or vandalism. Active construction areas would be fenced, and any increase in demand for police would be temporary and would not require construction of new or expanded police facilities. The student capacity of the proposed project would remain unchanged, and the site would continue to operate as a school. Additionally, in the event of an emergency at the project site that required more resources than the Roseville Police Department could provide, the Roseville Police Department would request assistance from other nearby police departments, such as the Rocklin Police Department. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are necessary. c) Schools?
No Impact. School services are related to the size of the residential population, the geographic area served, and community characteristics. The proposed project would not increase the population in the attendance boundary or otherwise increase demand for school services. The proposed project would not result in changes in land use (e.g., housing) that would result in population growth or create a greater demand for school services.

Therefore, no impact would occur, and no mitigation measures are necessary. d) Parks?
No Impact. Impacts on public parks and recreational facilities are generally caused by population or employment growth. The proposed project would not increase population or significantly increase employment.

The proposed project would not result in the increased demand for additional parks and recreation services either on-site or in the surrounding area. Therefore, physical impacts to parks and recreation from increased population growth would not occur. No impacts to parks would occur and no mitigation measures are necessary.
e) Other public facilities?
No Impact. The proposed project would not result in impacts associated with the provision of other new or physically altered public facilities (e.g., libraries, hospitals, childcare, teen, or senior centers). Physical impacts to public services are usually associated with population in-migration and growth, which increase the demand for public services and facilities. No new population would be generated by the proposed uses; therefore, no increased demand on other public facilities is anticipated. No impacts to other public facilities would occur and no mitigation measures are necessary.

Addendum Attachment 2

R O S E V I L L E H I G H S C H O O L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

R O S E V I L L E J O I N T U N I O N H I G H S C H O O L D I S T R I C T

3. Environmental Analysis

RECREATION
a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities, such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
No Impact. The City of Roseville owns and manages several neighborhood parks, neighborhood/school parks, and citywide (regional) parks with a combined acreage of approximately 1,043 acres (City of Roseville 2020b). The City of Roseville has an adopted standard of nine acres of parkland per 1,000 residents and defines “parkland” to include public developed parks, recreational open space, and joint-use park-school facilities. The nine-acre standard is further divided into six acres of developed parks per 1,000 residents and three acres of open space per 1,000 residents—the same ratio specified in the Quimby Act for park land acquisition (City of Roseville 2020a). The project would not result in an increase in population. Therefore, the construction of new park space or other city recreational facilities would not be required. There would be no impact related to the physical deterioration of existing recreation parks or other recreational facilities. b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? No Impact. The proposed project would not require the construction or expansion of off-site recreational facilities. Furthermore, the proposed project would neither increase population through construction of homes nor induce population growth that would require expanded recreational facilities; therefore, there is no impact.

TRANSPORTATION
Would the project:
a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities?
No Impact. The proposed project would not substantially change the site’s vehicular, pedestrian, or bicycle access and on-site circulation system. The existing driveways on the north side of Tiger Way and the east side of Campo Street would continue to provide access to the campus for vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians.

The proposed project would result in the construction of a new competition pool that will occupy the location of the existing parking lot adjacent to the football field and old auxiliary gymnasium. As such, the proposed project would result in minor modifications to the on-site circulation pattern. However, on-site circulation would not be impaired, and motorists would be able to navigate around the competition pool and continue to access the senior parking lot. Additionally, a total of 240 new parking spaces will be provided where the existing portables are located. These parking spaces would be accessible from the Campo Street driveway. Though the project would result in a decrease of 56 parking spaces in the parking lot where the proposed competition pool is located, the project would result in a net increase of 184 total parking spaces, which would still adequately accommodate the parking demands.

Addendum Attachment 2

R O S E V I L L E H I G H S C H O O L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

R O S E V I L L E J O I N T U N I O N H I G H S C H O O L D I S T R I C T

3. Environmental Analysis
April 2024 Page 83
There would be no changes to pedestrian and circulation patterns because they would enter the campus via the Tiger Way or Campo Street driveways and proceed to their destination through the parking lot. The existing sidewalks along Campo Street, Berry Street, and the other streets in the area would continue to be used by pedestrians. Furthermore, the proposed project would not significantly affect any public transportation facilities or operation because the proposed project would result in no change to student capacity, and therefore, no change in public transit users.

In summary, the proposed project would not adversely affect traffic conditions on the study area street network or the internal circulation system, nor would it affect the performance of any transit or nonmotorized transportation facilities. The project would not conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities, and no mitigation measures would be required.
b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? No Impact. Vehicle delays and levels of service (LOS) have historically been used as the basis for determining the significance of traffic impacts as standard practice in CEQA documents. On September 27, 2013, SB 743 was signed into law, starting a process that fundamentally changed transportation impact analyses as part of CEQA compliance. SB 743 eliminate auto delay, LOS, another similar measures of vehicular capacity or traffic congestion as the sole basis for determining significant impacts under CEQA. As part of the new CEQA Guidelines, the new criteria “shall promote the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the development of multimodal transportation networks, and a diversity of land uses” (Public Resources Code Section 21099(b)(1)).

Pursuant to SB 743, the California Natural Resources Agency adopted revisions to the CEQA Guidelines on December 28, 2018, to implement SB 743. CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 describes how transportation impacts are to be analyzed after SB 743. Under the revised CEQA Guidelines, metrics related to VMT were required beginning July 1, 2020, to evaluate the significance of transportation impacts under CEQA for development projects, land use plans, and transportation infrastructure projects. The State provided an “opt-in period” and did not require lead agencies to apply for a VMT metric until July 1, 2020. However, in January 2020, State courts stated that under the Public Resources Code Section 21099, subdivision (b)(2), “automobile delay, as described solely by LOS or similar measures of vehicular capacity or traffic congestion shall not be considered a significant impact on the environment” under CEQA, except for roadway capacity projects.

As stated in the “Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA” (California Office or Planning and Research, December 2018) and the “Vehicle Miles Traveled – Focused Transportation Impact Study Guide (Caltrans, May 20, 2020), projects that generate or attract fewer than 110 trips per day generally may be assumed to cause a less-than-significant transportation impact and can be screened from a CEQA VMT analysis because they fall into the small project category.

While the proposed project would not result in an increase in the number of students at the project site, the traffic associated with students and staff would be traveling on the area’s roadway network regardless of the status of the proposed project. The demand is generated by the number of eligible and age-appropriate students in the area and is not generated by the size of the school’s buildings. As there would be no increase in traffic volumes and as the proposed project is well below the CEQA VMT threshold of 110 trips per day, the proposed Addendum Attachment 2

R O S E V I L L E H I G H S C H O O L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

R O S E V I L L E J O I N T U N I O N H I G H S C H O O L D I S T R I C T

3. Environmental Analysis

project can be screened from any further CEQA VMT analysis and would not result in a significant impact relative to VMT.

Therefore, the proposed project would have no VMT impacts and no significant impact would occur. c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? No Impact. The proposed project would not substantially modify the on- or off-site access or circulation system. Access to the site for vehicles, bicyclists, and pedestrians would continue to occur via the existing driveways on the north side of Tiger Way and the east side of Campo Street. The streets, intersections, driveways, and on-site circulation system are designed to accommodate the anticipated levels of vehicular and pedestrian activity and have historically been accommodating school-related traffic on a daily basis. They would continue to be compatible with the design and operation of a school. As the proposed project would not result in any substantial modifications to the existing access or circulation features at the site or on the surrounding streets, there would be no impacts involving increased hazards due to a geometric design feature or incompatible uses.
d) Result in inadequate emergency access?
No Impact. The existing access and circulation features at the site, including the driveways, on-site circulation roads, parking lots, and fire lanes, would continue to accommodate emergency ingress and egress by fire trucks, police units, and ambulance/paramedic vehicles. The proposed project would not alter any emergency access features at the site. Emergency vehicles could easily access the new facilities and all other areas of the site via on-site travel corridors. The proposed project would not, therefore, result in inadequate emergency access. No impacts would occur, and no mitigation measures are necessary.

TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, or cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k).

Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. The project site is not listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources or in a local register of historical resources, as defined in PRC Section 5020.1(k). As discussed in Section 3.5, Cultural Resources, the potential to discover an unknown tribal cultural resource on the project site is unlikely given the developed nature of the site and archaeological records. If any tribal cultural resource is found during ground-disturbing activities, construction will be halted, and Mitigation Measure CUL-1 and Mitigation Measure TCR-1 shall be implemented as necessary. As the property has been previously disturbed, it is not anticipated that unknown tribal cultural resources are present on-site. Impacts would be less with implementation of mitigation.

Addendum Attachment 2

R O S E V I L L E H I G H S C H O O L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

R O S E V I L L E J O I N T U N I O N H I G H S C H O O L D I S T R I C T

3. Environmental Analysis
April 2024 Page 85
Mitigation Measure
TCR-1 If any suspected tribal cultural resources (TCRs) are discovered during ground-disturbing construction activities, all work shall cease within 100 feet of the find, or an agreed-upon distance based on the project area and nature of the find. A Tribal Representative from a California Native American tribe that is traditionally and culturally affiliated with a geographic area shall be immediately notified and shall determine if the find is a TCR (PRC Section 21074). The Tribal Representative will make recommendations for further evaluation and treatment as necessary.

When avoidance is infeasible, preservation in place is the preferred option for mitigation of TCRs under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and tribal protocols, and every effort shall be made to preserve the resources in place, including through project redesign, if feasible. Culturally appropriate treatment may be, but is not limited to, processing materials for reburial, minimizing handling of cultural objects, leaving objects in place within the landscape, or returning objects to a location in the project area where they will not be subject to future impacts. Permanent curation of TCRs will not take place unless approved in writing by the California Native American tribe that is traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area.

The contractor shall implement any measures deemed by the CEQA lead agency to be necessary and feasible to preserve in place, avoid, or minimize impacts to the resource, including, but not limited to, facilitating the appropriate tribal treatment of the find, as necessary. Treatment that preserves or restores the cultural character and integrity of a TCR may include tribal monitoring, culturally appropriate recovery of cultural objects, and reburial of cultural objects or cultural soil.

Work at the discovery location cannot resume until all necessary investigation and evaluation of the discovery under the requirements of the CEQA, including Assembly Bill 52, have been satisfied.
ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.

Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. As of July 1, 2015, PRC Sections 21080.1, 21080.3.1, and 21080.3.2 require public agencies to consult with California Native American tribes recognized by the NAHC for the purpose of mitigating impacts to tribal cultural resources. This law does not preclude agencies from initiating consultation with the tribes that are culturally and traditionally affiliated with their jurisdictions.

Addendum Attachment 2

R O S E V I L L E H I G H S C H O O L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

R O S E V I L L E J O I N T U N I O N H I G H S C H O O L D I S T R I C T

3. Environmental Analysis

In accordance with PRC Section 21080.1(d), a lead agency is required to provide formal notification of intended development projects to Native American tribes that have requested to be on the lead agency’s list for receiving such notification. The formal notification is required to include a brief description of the proposed project and its location, lead agency contact information, and a notification that the California Native American tribe has 30 days to request consultation for tribal cultural resources. The following tribes are on the District’s notification list pursuant to AB 52:
▪ Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians
▪ Tsi Akim Maidu
▪ United Auburn Indian Community of the Auburn Rancheria ▪ Wilton Rancheria
▪ Colfax-Todds Valley Consolidated Tribe
▪ Nevada City Rancheria Nisenan Tribe
As of the time of the publication of this MND no tribes have contacted the District, and as such, no consultation has been initiated. No evidence or readily available records exist to indicate that TCRs were identified during prior disturbance and development of the project site, and it is unlikely that any such resources would be uncovered or affected during project-related grading and construction activities. If any TCR is found during ground-disturbing activities, construction will be halted, Mitigation Measure CUL-1 and Mitigation Measure TCR-1 shall be implemented as necessary. As the property has been previously disturbed, it is not anticipated that unknown TCRs are present on-site. Impacts would be less than significant with implementation of mitigation.

UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Would the project:
a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? Less Than Significant Impact.

Water Treatment Facilities
The City of Roseville would provide potable water to the project site. The City has three sources of water supply: surface water, groundwater, and recycled water for irrigation. The City obtains its primary water supply from the Federal Central Valley Project, owned and operated by the United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR), of which Folsom Lake is a part. This is achieved through a contract with the USBR, which ensures water from Folsom Lake in perpetuity. In addition to USBR water supplies, the City has contracts with the Placer County Water Agency and the San Juan Water District for additional water supply to the City for municipal and industrial purposes (City of Roseville 2020a). The City currently has contracts for up to 66,000 acre-feet of American River water supplies diverted from the Folsom Reservoir. The City currently has six groundwater wells. The City treats wastewater at its Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant and Pleasant Grove Addendum Attachment 2

R O S E V I L L E H I G H S C H O O L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

R O S E V I L L E J O I N T U N I O N H I G H S C H O O L D I S T R I C T

3. Environmental Analysis
April 2024 Page 87
Wastewater Treatment Plant. Recycled water is used by the City for landscape irrigation, golf course irrigation, construction uses, and to provide cooling water for the Roseville Energy Park (City of Roseville 2020b).

The project site has an existing connection to the water distribution system operated by the City of Roseville.

Water use at the project site includes the irrigation system; fire protection; and drinking water, restroom, and housekeeping appliances. The proposed project would not increase student capacity; therefore, the overall demand for water treatment would not increase. Additionally, the City of Roseville estimates it will have sufficient water supplies to meet proposed growth for normal years; water supply deficit may occur in singledry years and some multiple-dry years. However, according to the City of Roseville 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, remaining deficits will be mitigated by potable water conservation measures implemented as part of the Water Shortage Contingency Plan (City of Roseville 2022). The proposed project would not require the relocation or construction of new or expanded water treatment facilities. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are necessary.

Wastewater Treatment Facilities
The project site has an existing connection to the wastewater collection and treatment system owned and operated by the City of Roseville. The proposed project would be served by this system and would not require the relocation or construction of new or expanded wastewater treatment facilities. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are necessary.

Stormwater Drainage Facilities
See response to question 3.10.c.iii in Section 3.10, Hydrology and Water Quality. As substantiated in that section, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are necessary.

Electricity Facilities
Electrical needs to the project site would be provided by the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) via existing infrastructure in the immediate area of the project site. Uses of electricity under the proposed project would include indoor lighting, office appliances, perimeter lighting, and security systems. All utility connections to the proposed project would be required to comply with applicable federal, state, and local regulations.

Therefore, relocation and expansion of existing facilities and construction of new facilities would not be required. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are necessary.

Natural Gas Facilities
Natural gas to the project site would also be provided by PG&E via existing infrastructure in the immediate area of the project site. Use of natural gas under the proposed project would include HVAC systems and hot water heaters. Total natural gas supplies available to PG&E are forecast to remain constant at 3,116 million cubic feet per day (MMCF/day) from 2020 through 2035 (CGEU 2022).

Addendum Attachment 2

R O S E V I L L E H I G H S C H O O L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

R O S E V I L L E J O I N T U N I O N H I G H S C H O O L D I S T R I C T

3. Environmental Analysis

PG&E projects that it will have sufficient supplies to meet the demands in its service area. Therefore, the proposed project’s natural gas demand is within PG&E’s forecast increase, and the proposed project would not require PG&E to obtain new or expanded natural gas supplies. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are necessary.

Telecommunication Facilities
Various private services, including AT&T, provide telecommunication services to the city, including the project site. No changes to telecommunication facilities would occur. Therefore, project development would not require the construction of new or expanded telecommunication facilities. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are necessary.
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years? Less Than Significant Impact. As substantiated above in Section 3.19.a, the City of Roseville will have adequate water supplies to meet water demands in its service area through 2045 during normal years; water supply deficit may occur in single dry years and some multiple dry years. However, according to the City of Roseville 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, remaining deficits will be mitigated by potable water conservation measures implemented as part of the Water Shortage Contingency Plan (City of Roseville 2022).

Additionally, the proposed project’s landscaping would be required to comply with California’s Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, which sets landscape design standards for water-efficient landscaping.

Therefore, impacts on water supplies due to project development would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are necessary.
c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?
Less Than Significant Impact. As substantiated in Section 3.19.a, the proposed project would result in no change to student capacity; therefore, it is anticipated that the wastewater facilities would continue to have adequate capacity to serve the proposed project. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. d) Generate solid waste in excess of state or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? Less Than Significant Impact. Solid waste is transported to the Western Placer Waste Management Authority’s Western Regional Sanitary Landfill at 3195 Athens Road in unincorporated Placer County; this landfill serves the western portion of the county, including Roseville. Most of the solid waste generated in the city is first transported to the material recovery facility at the landfill. The material recovery facility separates and recovers waste products for recycling, reuse, or conversion to energy resources.

Addendum Attachment 2

R O S E V I L L E H I G H S C H O O L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

R O S E V I L L E J O I N T U N I O N H I G H S C H O O L D I S T R I C T

3. Environmental Analysis
April 2024 Page 89
In 2019, 98.8 percent of solid waste generated in the city was disposed of at the Western Regional Sanitary Landfill (CalRecycle 2019a). The landfill is permitted to received 1,900 tons of solid waste per day and has a remaining capacity of 29,093,819 tons (CalRecycle 2019b).5 Project operation is estimated to generate

0.007 pound per square feet per day, resulting in 2,269 pounds per day or 1.13 tons per day (Cal Recycle 2019c).

The proposed project would result in a negligible increase in solid waste. There is adequate landfill capacity in the region for project-generated solid waste, and project development would not require new or expanded landfills. Therefore, impacts to solid waste would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are necessary.
e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
Less Than Significant Impact. The following laws and regulations govern solid waste disposal:
▪ AB 939 (Chapter 1095, Statutes of 1989). The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 required each city, county, and regional agency to develop a source reduction and recycling element of an integrated waste management plan that contained specified components, including a source reduction component, a recycling component, and a composting component. With certain exceptions, the source reduction and recycling components were required to divert 50 percent of all solid waste from landfill disposal or transformation by January 1, 2000, through source reduction, recycling, and composting. ▪ AB 32 (Chapter 488, Statutes of 2006). The California Global Warming Solutions Act established mandatory recycling as one of the measures to reduce GHG emissions and was adopted in the Scoping Plan by CARB.
▪ AB 1327. The California Solid Waste Reuse and Recycling Access Act of 1991 requires local agencies to adopt ordinances mandating the use of recyclable materials in development projects.

Project-related construction and operation phases would be implemented in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations that govern solid waste disposal. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are necessary.

WILDFIRE
If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high FHSZs, would the project:
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Less Than Significant Impact. California Government Code Chapter 6.8 directs CAL FIRE to identify areas of very high fire hazard severity in State Responsibility Areas (SRA). Mapping of these very high FHSZs is based on data and models of potential fuels over a 30- to 50-year time horizon and their expected fire behavior and burn probabilities, which quantify the likelihood and nature of vegetation fire exposure to buildings. SRA FHSZ maps were initially developed in the mid-1990s and are now being updated based on improved science, 5 A volume-to-weight conversion rate of 2,000 lbs./cubic yard (1 ton/cubic yard) for “Compacted - MSW Large Landfill with Best Management Practices” is used as per CalRecycle’s 2016 volume-to-weight conversion factors.

Addendum Attachment 2

R O S E V I L L E H I G H S C H O O L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

R O S E V I L L E J O I N T U N I O N H I G H S C H O O L D I S T R I C T

3. Environmental Analysis

mapping techniques, and data. In 2008, the California Building Standards Commission adopted CBC Chapter 7A requiring new buildings in FHSZs to use ignition-resistant construction methods and materials.

The project site is not in a very high FHSZ (CAL FIRE 2024). Development on the project site would be subject to compliance with the 2022 CBC. Roseville is covered under the City of Roseville Emergency Operations Plan and the City of Roseville Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan. These plans provide guidance to effectively respond to any emergency, including wildfires. In addition, all proposed construction is required to meet minimum standards for fire safety. Implementation of these plans and policies in conjunction with compliance with the CFC would minimize the risk of loss due to wildfires.

Furthermore, the proposed project would not conflict with adopted emergency response or evacuation plans.

The surrounding roadways would continue to provide emergency access to the project site and surroundings during construction and postconstruction. In addition, as with all projects in Roseville, conformance with the CBC and CFC would be required. Therefore, impacts are considered less than significant. b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, would wildfire risks be exacrbated, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
Less Than Significant Impact. There are three primary factors used in assessing wildfire hazards— topography, weather, and fuel. The project site is relatively flat and is in a predominantly urbanized environment.

The city does not have high-speed prevailing winds, and average wind speeds are approximately 6 miles per hour during the windier part of the year, from May to September (Weather Spark 2024). The proposed project would not impact weather or topography.

At project completion, the site would include pervious and impervious surfaces. According to CAL FIRE, the project site is not in a very high FHSZ (CAL FIRE 2024). Additionally, development on the project site would be subject to compliance with the CBC and under the City of Roseville Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan, which provides guidance to effectively respond to and mitigate emergencies, including wildfires. Therefore, the project and site conditions would not contribute to an increase in exposure to wildfire risk. Impacts would be less than significant.
c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? Less Than Significant Impact. The project site would require expansion of connection to utilities such as electricity, water, and sewer. The project applicant is required to pay for connections and maintenance of onsite utility infrastructure. The utilities would be installed to meet service requirements. The project site is not within a VHFHSZ and the construction of infrastructure improvements for the project would not directly increase fire risk. Impacts would be less than significant.

Addendum Attachment 2

R O S E V I L L E H I G H S C H O O L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

R O S E V I L L E J O I N T U N I O N H I G H S C H O O L D I S T R I C T

3. Environmental Analysis
April 2024 Page 91
d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed in Sections 3.7 and 3.10 respectively, the project site is not in a landslide hazard area or a floodplain. Historical geographic mapping does not show any flooding or safety concerns caused by the drainage. Construction activities related to the proposed project would be subject to compliance with the CBC and would include BMPs. BMPs may include, but are not limited to, covering of the soil, use of a dust-inhibiting material, landscaping, use of straw and jute, hydroseeding, and grading. Therefore, with implementation of BMPs, impacts are less than significant.

MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number, or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. As substantiated in Section 3.4, Biological Resources, tree or vegetation removal would be required for the proposed project; therefore, the project could result in direct impacts on special-status wildlife during construction. However, compliance with Mitigation Measures BIO-1 and BIO-2 would ensure that impacts to biological resources do not occur.

As substantiated in Section 3.5, Cultural Resources, no historic resources were identified on-site and, therefore, the project site does not have the potential to eliminate important examples of California history or prehistory.

Because the property has been previously disturbed, it is not anticipated that unknown tribal cultural resources are present on-site. However, compliance with Mitigation Measure CUL-1 would ensure that impacts to archaeological resources do not occur.

As substantiated in Section 3.7, Geology and Soils, the proposed project would require limited grading and other ground-disturbing construction activities to accommodate the construction of the proposed project and utility requirements. Due to the ground disturbance associated with construction, there is potential that natural landform beneath the site would be encountered during construction and that subsurface resources and/or paleontological resources would be discovered. However, compliance with Mitigation Measure GEO-1 would ensure that impacts to paleontological resources do not occur.

As substantiated in Section 3.18, Tribal Cultural Resources, the project site is not listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources or in a local register of historical resources as defined in PRC Section 5020.1(k). Because the property has been previously disturbed, it is not anticipated that unknown TCRs are present on-site. However, compliance with Mitigation Measure CUL-1 and Mitigation Measure TCR-1 would ensure that impacts to archaeological resources do not occur.

Addendum Attachment 2

R O S E V I L L E H I G H S C H O O L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

R O S E V I L L E J O I N T U N I O N H I G H S C H O O L D I S T R I C T

3. Environmental Analysis

b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.)
Less Than Significant Impact. The issues relevant to project development are confined to the immediate project site and surrounding area. Additionally, the project site is in an area of the city where supporting utility infrastructure (e.g., water, wastewater, electricity, natural gas, and drainage) and services (e.g., solid waste collection) currently exist. Project implementation would not require the construction of new or expansion of existing utility infrastructure and services.

Furthermore, impacts related to other topical areas, such as air quality, GHG, hydrology and water quality, and traffic, would not be cumulatively considerable with development of the project in conjunction with other cumulative projects. In consideration of the preceding factors, the project’s contribution to cumulative impacts would be rendered less than significant; therefore, project impacts would not be cumulatively considerable. c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed in the respective topical sections of this IS/MND, implementation of the proposed project would not result in significant impacts in the areas of GHG, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, noise, or wildfire, which may cause adverse effects on human beings. Therefore, impacts related to these environmental effects were deemed to be less than significant with applicable mitigation.

Addendum Attachment 2

April 2024 Page 93

4.References
California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). 2022. California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod). Version 2022.1. Developed by: ICF in collaboration with the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District.

California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2005. Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective, https://sfmohcd.org/sites/default/files/20%20- %20CARB%2C%20Air%20Quality%20and%20Land%20Use%20Handbook%202005.pdf, accessed March 5, 2024.
––––––. 2018, October 25, 2018. 2018 Updates to the California State Implementation Plan. https://www.arb.ca.gov/planning/sip/2018sipupdate/2018update.pdf?_ga=2.19332344.1366902301 .1669752473-1515111945.1627578145, accessed March 5, 2024. ––––––. 2022, 2022 Scoping Plan for Achieving Carbon Neutrality, https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2022-12/2022-sp.pdf, accessed March 5, 2024. ––––––. 2024, March 4 (accessed). Renovation or Demolition Locations. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/ourwork/programs/asbestos-neshap-program/renovation-or-demolition-locations.

California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2024, January 22 (accessed). California Natural Community Conservation Plans. https://wildlife.ca.gov/conservation/planning/nccp/plans.

California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE). 2024, January 22 (accessed). FHSZ Viewer. https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/
California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle). 2019a. Jurisdiction Disposal and Alternative Daily Cover (ADC): Tons by Facility.
https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/LGCentral/DisposalReporting/Destination/DisposalByFacility. ———. 2019b. SWIS Facility Detail Western Regional Landfill (31-AA-0210). https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SolidWaste/SiteActivity/Details/2542?siteID=2273. ———. 2019c. Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates.
https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/WasteCharacterization/General/Rates.

California Department of Conservation (CDC). 2006. Placer County Williamson Act Lands 2006. ———. 2018. Mineral Land Classification Map of Concrete Aggregate in the Greater Sacramento Area Production-Consumption Region.

Addendum Attachment 2

R O S E V I L L E H I G H S C H O O L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

R O S E V I L L E J O I N T U N I O N H I G H S C H O O L D I S T R I C T

4. References

______. 2024a, January 23 (accessed). California Important Farmland Finder. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/ciff/
______. 2024b, January 23 (accessed). Alquist-Priolo Site Investigation Reports. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/informationwarehouse/index.html?map=regulatorymaps ______. 2024c, January 23 (accessed). Fault Activity Map of California. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/fam/
California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). 2024, January 23 (accessed). Envirostor:

Viewer. Online database. https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2024, January 23 (accessed). California Highway System. https://caltrans.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id= 026e830c914c495797c969a3e5668538.

California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA). 2015. A Strategic Approach to Planning for and Assessing the Effectiveness of Stormwater Programs.

California Gas and Electric Utilities (CGEU). 2022. 2022 California Gas Report Supplement. https://www.socalgas.com/
sites/default/files/Joint_Utility_Biennial_Comprehensive_California_Gas_Report_2022.pdf.

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2024, January 23 (accessed). Flood Map Number 06061C0944H. https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search?AddressQuery.

Federal Transit Administration (FTA). 2018, September. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment.

National Park Service (NPS). 2020, September. National Register of Historic Places. US Department of the Interior. https://www.nps.gov/maps/full.html?mapId=7ad17cc9-b808-4ff8-a2f9-a99909164466.

Office of Historic Preservation (OHP). 2024, January 23 (accessed). California Historical Landmarks by County. California State Parks.
https://ohp.parks.ca.gov/ListedResources/?view=county&criteria=31.

Placer County Air Pollution Control District (PCAPCD). 2017. CEQA Handbook. Accessed November 29, 2022. https://www.placerair.org/1801/CEQA-Handbook.

Placer County Transportation Planning Agency (PCTPA), 2019, November. Final RTP 2040 Placer County Regional Transportation Plan.
https://pctpa.specialdistrict.org/files/e9ce02f5b/Final_2040_RTP_Full_Document.pdf, accessed March 5, 2024.

Roseville, City of. 2020a. City of Roseville General Plan 2035. https://www.roseville.ca.us/government/ departments/development_services/planning/general_plan_development_guidelines.

Addendum Attachment 2

R O S E V I L L E H I G H S C H O O L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

R O S E V I L L E J O I N T U N I O N H I G H S C H O O L D I S T R I C T

4. References
April 2024 Page 95
———. 2020b. City of Roseville 2035 General Plan Update: Final Environmental Impact Report. https://www.roseville.ca.us/government/departments/development_services/planning/general _plan_development_guidelines.
———. 2022. City of Roseville 2020 Urban Water Management Plan. https://www.roseville.ca.us/ government/departments/environmental_utilities/at_your_service/water_supply/urban_water_ management_plan.
———. 2024, January 22 (accessed). City of Roseville Interactive Maps: Parcel Viewer. https://roseville.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=2a67e5a4e1cc4f489868b6563 589bf19.

Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD). 2023, October 17. Sacramento Regional 2015 NAAQS 8-Hour Ozone Attainment & Reasonable Further Progress Plan. https://www.airquality.org/ProgramCoordination/Documents/Sacramento%20Regional%2 02015%20NAAQS%208%20Hour%20Ozone%20Attainment%20and%20Reasonable%20F urther%20Progr ess%20Plan.pdf, accessed March 5, 2024.

State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB). 2024, January 23 (accessed). Geotracker: Viewer. Online database. https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/.

Toth, William J. 1979, August. Noise Abatement Techniques for Construction Equipment. Prepared for US Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

United States Census Bureau (USCB). 2024, January 23 (accessed). Quick Facts: Roseville City California. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/rosevillecitycalifornia.

United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2024, January 23 (accessed). Information for Planning and Consultation: IPaC Resource List for Placer County. https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac.

U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC). 2024, January 23 (accessed). Benefits of Green Building. https://www.usgbc.org/press/benefits-of-green-building.

Weather Spark. 2024, January 24 (accessed). Average Weather in Roseville. https://weatherspark.com/y/1156/Average-Weather-in-Roseville-California-United-States-YearRound.

Addendum Attachment 2

R O S E V I L L E H I G H S C H O O L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

R O S E V I L L E J O I N T U N I O N H I G H S C H O O L D I S T R I C T

4. References

This page intentionally left blank.

Addendum Attachment 2

April 2024 Page 97

5.List of Preparers

LEAD AGENCY
Scott Davis, Director of Facilities Development

PLACEWORKS
Dwayne Mears, AICP, Principal
Miles Barker, Associate II
Lance Park, Senior Associate II
Emily Parks, Associate I
Jacob Cisneros, Associate I
Cary Nakama, Graphic Designer
Addendum Attachment 2

R O S E V I L L E H I G H S C H O O L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

R O S E V I L L E J O I N T U N I O N H I G H S C H O O L D I S T R I C T

5. List of Preparers

This page intentionally left blank.

Addendum Attachment 2

R O S E V I L L E H I G H S C H O O L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

R O S E V I L L E J O I N T U N I O N H I G H S C H O O L D I S T R I C T Appendices
April 2024
Appendix A Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and
Energy Modeling Data
Addendum Attachment 2

R O S E V I L L E H I G H S C H O O L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

R O S E V I L L E J O I N T U N I O N H I G H S C H O O L D I S T R I C T Appendices
PlaceWorks
This page intentionally left blank.

Addendum Attachment 2

R O S E V I L L E H I G H S C H O O L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

R O S E V I L L E J O I N T U N I O N H I G H S C H O O L D I S T R I C T Appendices
April 2024
Appendix B Construction HRA Modeling
Addendum Attachment 2

R O S E V I L L E H I G H S C H O O L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

R O S E V I L L E J O I N T U N I O N H I G H S C H O O L D I S T R I C T Appendices
PlaceWorks
This page intentionally left blank.

Addendum Attachment 2

R O S E V I L L E H I G H S C H O O L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

R O S E V I L L E J O I N T U N I O N H I G H S C H O O L D I S T R I C T Appendices
April 2024
Appendix C Fundamentals of Noise
Addendum Attachment 2

R O S E V I L L E H I G H S C H O O L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

R O S E V I L L E J O I N T U N I O N H I G H S C H O O L D I S T R I C T Appendices
PlaceWorks
This page intentionally left blank.

Addendum Attachment 2

R O S E V I L L E H I G H S C H O O L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

R O S E V I L L E J O I N T U N I O N H I G H S C H O O L D I S T R I C T Appendices
April 2024
Appendix D Historic Resources Evaluation Report
Addendum Attachment 2

R O S E V I L L E H I G H S C H O O L I M P R O V E M E N T P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y

R O S E V I L L E J O I N T U N I O N H I G H S C H O O L D I S T R I C T Appendices
PlaceWorks
This page intentionally left blank.

Addendum Attachment 2

kimley-horn.com 555 Capitol Mall, Suite 300, Sacramento, California 95814 916 858 5800 Memorandum
To: Jack Varozza, P.E., QSD/P
Senior Engineer, City of Roseville
From: Stephen Dillon, P.E.

Re: Campo Street Abandonment
Traffic Evaluation
Roseville, California
Date: July 31, 2025
The purpose of this memorandum is to document the transportation analysis completed for the Campo Street Abandonment (the “proposed project” or “project”) located within the existing Roseville High School (“RHS”) campus, between Coronado Avenue and Sierra Boulevard, in Roseville, California. This memorandum evaluates the weekday AM (drop-off) and School-PM (pick-up) peak-hours under Existing (2025) conditions.

The primary conclusions from this evaluation are as follows:
 The project, which would have the effect of diverting extracurricular event (i.e. Roseville High School football game) traffic from Campo Street to the adjacent neighborhood network, is not anticipated to significantly alter the adjacent roadways’ typical existing daily operations.  The existing drop-off/pick-up pattern along Alta Vista Avenue, Sierra Boulevard, Las Flores Avenue, and Coronado Avenue presents a variety of driver behaviors, including parking in bike lanes and u-turns.
 Prevailing vehicle speeds along Sierra Boulevard currently exceed the posted 30 MPH speed limit.  As an outcome of this evaluation, we recommend that the Roseville Joint Union High School District, in coordination with the City of Roseville, develop a plan for targeted enforcement intended to address existing driver behavior within the Historic Sierra Vista community proximate to RHS, independent of the project.

Project Understanding
Kimley-Horn understands that the Roseville Joint Union High School District (“RJUHSD”, “School District”, or “District”) is proposing that the City of Roseville (the “City”) abandon the existing segment of Campo Street between Coronado Avenue and Sierra Boulevard and relinquish the facility to the School District (Exhibit 1). The project segment of Campo Street is understood1 and observed to already be closed to through traffic on weekdays during Roseville High School operating hours. The project segment is open to through traffic outside of Roseville High School operating hours. This traffic evaluation has been requested in response to the following concerns/comments provided by the proximate Historic Sierra Vista community regarding the project:
 The project will increase traffic volumes on Sierra Boulevard, Las Flores Avenue, and Alta Vista Avenue without Campo Street
 The project will contribute to increased traffic speeds on Sierra Boulevard, Las Flores Avenue, and Alta Vista Avenue without Campo Street
 The project will affect drop-off/pick-up operations at the Alta Vista Avenue and Sierra Boulevard intersection
1 Email correspondence with Jack Varozza, City of Roseville, December 4, 2024.

Addendum Attachment 3

Campo Street Abandonment Page 2 of 8
Traffic Evaluation July 31, 2025
The primary purposes of this analysis are to evaluate the potential effects of the proposed project on traffic operations along Sierra Boulevard, Las Flores Avenue, and Alta Vista Avenue, and on drop-off/pickup operations at the Alta Vista Avenue and Sierra Boulevard intersection.

Data Collection
Kimley-Horn manually collected (via traffic count subconsultant) daily directional roadway segment traffic counts on Tuesday, March 18, 2025, to establish directional weekday roadway segment traffic volumes at the following study segments (Exhibit 1):

1. Campo Street, between Coronado Avenue and Sierra Boulevard

2. Las Flores Avenue, between Coronado Avenue and Sierra Boulevard

3. Las Flores Avenue, between Alta Vista Avenue and Sierra Boulevard

4. Sierra Boulevard, between Sequioa Street and Mariposa Street (includes speed data)

5. Sierra Boulevard, between Las Flores Avenue and Alta Vista Avenue

6. Alta Vista Avenue, between Las Flores Avenue and Sierra Boulevard (includes speed data)

7. Campo Street, north of Sierra Boulevard
The following data was collected from the City2 to aid in completing this evaluation:
 2024 Roseville High School football game ticket data (Attachment A) Kimley-Horn completed a field visit on Tuesday, March 18, 2025, to observe study facility lane configurations, vehicle storage lengths, existing traffic control, speed limits, lane utilization, pedestrian activity, and other readily apparent features relevant to the Scope of Services. The field visit included observations between 8-9 AM and 2:45-3:45 PM regarding drop-off and pick-up operations, trip distribution, vehicle dwell times, vehicle occupancy, and parking behavior that could be anticipated to translate to the proposed project condition.

Assessment of Proposed Project
Evening Event Scenario
A reasonably anticipated evening event scenario was established using 2024 Roseville High School football ticket data (including home and visitor fan splits) provided by the City2 . The ticket data was
supplemented with vehicle occupancy data from FHWA3 to approximate the number of vehicles a typical game night might generate based on the number of home and visitor fans attending the event. Additional assumptions were made regarding the percentages of home and visitor fans who could be expected to overlap in attending both the Junior Varsity (JV) and Varsity football games which are understood to occur on the same evening. The anticipated number of vehicles produced by a typical football event and relevant assumptions are summarized in Table 1.

Trip Distribution
Directional roadway segment counts were used to establish a general distribution of trips accessing the high school parking lot located north of Sierra Boulevard. Directional roadway segment counts between 8:00-8:30 AM were supplemented by observed vehicle turning movements at the intersection of Las Flores Avenue and Sierra Boulevard between 8:10-8:30 AM on Tuesday, March 18, 2025. This data establishes a directional pattern of high school-bound trips during the peak-period for students arriving on campus. The distribution of trips was developed based on AM observations as it is assumed that all trips accessing the high school during this period will be traveling from “home.” 2 Email correspondence with Jack Varozza, City of Roseville, January 16, 2025. 3 Chapter 5: Event Operations Planning, Managing Travel for Planned Special Events, FHWA, February 1, 2017.

Addendum Attachment 3

Campo Street Abandonment Page 3 of 8
Traffic Evaluation July 31, 2025
Table 1 – Football Event Vehicle Generation
Directional roadway segment counts were also used to establish a distribution of trips leaving the high school from the high school parking lot located north of Sierra Boulevard. Directional roadway segment counts between 2:45-3:30 PM were used to consider a directional egress pattern from the high school during the peak-period for students leaving campus. While the PM distribution is a useful reference point, it presents more variance than the AM distribution as not all trips leaving the high school during the PM peak can be assumed to travel “home.” As such, it is expected that the AM peak-period home-based trip behavior would be generally consistent with inbound and outbound travel patterns for events occurring outside of Roseville High School operating hours.

As the traffic counts were gathered and observed while the Campo Street project segment was temporarily closed to vehicle traffic during the high school day, it is reasonably assumed that the same distribution will generally apply should Campo Street be permanently closed. Thus, it is reasonable to assume that home fan football game attendees would follow a trip distribution comparable to the one identified for the Weekday AM peak period. It is also assumed that visitor fans may be more widely distributed across the local network depending on their origins. The project trip distribution for home and visitor fans is provided in Exhibit 2.

Study Facilities and Analysis Methodology
A roadway segment operations analysis (volume thresholds) was conducted for a weekday for the following scenarios:

A. Existing (2025) Conditions
B. Existing (2025) plus Project Conditions
The roadway segment analysis was completed for the following roadway segments:

1. Campo Street, between Coronado Avenue and Sierra Boulevard

2. Las Flores Avenue, between Coronado Avenue and Sierra Boulevard

3. Las Flores Avenue, between Alta Vista Avenue and Sierra Boulevard

4. Sierra Boulevard, between Sequioa Street and Mariposa Street

5. Sierra Boulevard, between Las Flores Avenue and Alta Vista Avenue

6. Alta Vista Avenue, between Las Flores Avenue and Sierra Boulevard Level of Service (LOS) Definitions
The LOS of a facility is a qualitative measure used to describe operational conditions. LOS ranges from A, which represents minimal delay, to F, which represents heavy delay and a facility that is operating at or near its functional capacity.

Maximum 2024
Attendance* Home %* Home Fans Home Vehicle
Occupancy**
Possible
Home
Home JV
(35%)
JV:Varsity Overlap
(40%)
Home Varsity
(65%)
Total
Home
65% 1,007 2.8 360 126 -50 234 310
Visitor %* Visitor
Fans
Visitor Vehicle
Occupancy**
Possible
Visitor
Visitor JV
(20%)
JV:Varsity Overlap
(80%)
Visitor Varsity
(80%)
Total
Visitor
35% 543 2.2 247 49 -39 198 208
*Attendance data provided by City of Roseville and RJUHSD **Event Vehicle Occupancy data provided by FHWA
1,550
Estimated Event Vehicles
Addendum Attachment 3

Campo Street Abandonment Page 4 of 8
Traffic Evaluation July 31, 2025
Roadway segment Levels of Service for this study were determined using daily traffic volumes. In the absence of comparable references from the City or Placer County, roadway segment volume thresholds from Sacramento County4 were used to provide a planning level assessment of the project study facilities.

The study facility roadways are classified as “Residential collector with frontage.” Table 2 presents roadway segment LOS thresholds as classified by facility type.

Table 2 – Roadway Segment Level of Service Criteria
Daily operations were determined for the scenarios listed above. Exhibit 3 shows weekday volumes under Existing (2025) and Existing (2025) plus Project conditions. Study facility traffic count data sheets are provided in Attachment B.

Analysis Results
Existing Drop-off/Pick-up Operations
The analysis documented existing neighborhood circulation on Tuesday, March 18, 2025, surrounding drop-off and pick-up activities within the Historic Sierra Vista community during a typical weekday with Roseville High School classes in session. The existing circulation conditions were observed as follows:

Drop-off
 The peak period was observed to be from approximately 8:10 to 8:25 AM. The neighborhood was significantly less busy after 8:35 AM.
 Seven (7) drop-offs were observed within the immediate vicinity of the Alta Vista Avenue and Sierra Boulevard intersection.
 Four (4) vehicles made u-turns on Sierra Boulevard in advance of Alta Vista Avenue after dropping off students.
 Most vehicles passing through the Sierra Boulevard and Alta Vista Avenue intersection appeared to be students destined for the parking area behind Roseville High School.  26 drop-offs were observed on the segment of Las Flores Avenue between Sierra Boulevard and Coronado Avenue.
 Five (5) vehicles made u-turns on Las Flores Avenue between Sierra Boulevard and Coronado Avenue.
4 Transportation Analysis Guidelines, County of Sacramento, September 10, 2020.

LOS A LOS B LOS C LOS D LOS E
Residential collector with
frontage
2 1,600 3,200 4,800 6,400 8,000
Residential collector
without frontage
2 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 10,000
Source: Transportation Analysis Guidelines , County of Sacramento, September 10, 2020.

Residential 2
Facility Type # of
Lanes
Maximum Volume for Given Service Level
600 1,200 2,000 3,000 4,500
Addendum Attachment 3

Campo Street Abandonment Page 5 of 8
Traffic Evaluation July 31, 2025
Pick-up
 The peak period was observed to be from approximately 3:15 to 3:35 PM.  Vehicles started queueing along the Alta Vista Avenue curbs at 2:50 PM.  Vehicles started queueing along the Las Flores Avenue curbs at 3:15 PM.  Traffic within the neighborhood is predominantly inflow to the parking area behind Roseville High School until 3:20 PM.
 Six (6) vehicles were observed queueing within the bike lane along the south side of Sierra Boulevard between Las Flores Avenue and Alta Vista Avenue from 3:06 and 3:23 PM.  The local pattern was observed to shift to predominantly egressing students/vehicles around 3:25 PM.
 The north and south sides of Sierra Boulevard between Las Flores Avenue and Alta Vista Avenue are popular pick-up locations.
 15 U-turns were observed on Sierra Boulevard between Las Flores Avenue and Alta Vista Avenue.  Las Flores Avenue between Sierra Boulevard and Coronado Avenue is a popular pick-up location.

Roadway Segment Operations
The analysis evaluated the potential effects of rerouted event traffic from the project on local roadway operations within the Historic Sierra Vista community. “Plus Project” roadway segment performance was evaluated by layering rerouted event trips established in Table 1 on top of typical weekday traffic volumes according to the established trip distribution. Table 3 summarizes the neighborhood roadway segment Level of Service under Existing (2025) and Existing (2025) plus Project conditions Table 3 – Neighborhood Roadway Segment LOS

As indicated in Table 3, the study roadway segments operate at LOS A and LOS B in the Existing (2025) and Existing (2025) plus Project scenarios. All roadway segments exhibit sufficient capacity to accommodate the additional vehicles that would be reasonably anticipated during an evening afterschool event without access to Campo Street between Sierra Boulevard and Las Flores Avenue.

Daily
Volume LOS Daily Volume LOS
1 Campo Street, between Coronado
Avenue and Sierra Boulevard
Residential
collector with
frontage
2 1,934 B 2,141 B
2 Las Flores Avenue, between Coronado
Avenue and Sierra Boulevard
Residential
collector with
frontage
2 1,215 A 1,422 A
3 Las Flores Avenue, between Alta Vista
Avenue and Sierra Boulevard
Residential
collector with
frontage
2 473 A 473 A
4 Sierra Boulevard, between Sequioa
Street and Mariposa Street
Residential
collector with
frontage
2 1,632 B 2,098 B
5 Sierra Boulevard, between Las Flores
Avenue and Alta Vista Avenue
Residential
collector with
frontage
2 1,083 A 1,756 B
6 Alta Vista Avenue, between Las Flores
Avenue and Sierra Boulevard
Residential
collector with
frontage
2 624 A 987 A
ID Location Facility Type # of
Lanes
Existing (2025) Existing (2025)
plus Project
Addendum Attachment 3

Campo Street Abandonment Page 6 of 8
Traffic Evaluation July 31, 2025
Roadway Segment Speeds
The traffic data collected on Tuesday, March 18, 2025, captured directional vehicle speed data for the following roadway segments:
 Sierra Boulevard, between Sequioa Street and Mariposa Street  Alta Vista Avenue, between Las Flores Avenue and Sierra Boulevard The observed posted speed limit along Sierra Boulevard was 30 MPH. Table 4 presents the Average, Prevailing (85th-percentile), and 95th-percentile documented speeds for each roadway segment. Rerouted event traffic related to the project would not be anticipated to significantly alter the existing condition.

Table 4 – Roadway Segment Speeds
Traffic Management Plan (TMP) Strategies
Should the project proceed, RJUHSD may consider implementing traffic management strategies in coordination with the City to lessen the effects of “large” extracurricular events on the local Historic Sierra Vista community, beyond the level to which the community is already affected on a daily basis during normal school activities. Traffic control measures for the pre-event and post-event time periods are intended to facilitate the following:
 Limiting the number of vehicles that circulate looking for parking  Limiting vehicle congestion before and after events by directing traffic appropriately to/from RHS via Alta Vista Avenue, Sierra Boulevard, and Las Flores Avenue  Enhanced public safety for attendees of events held at RHS and residents of Historic Sierra Vista RJUHSD may consider placing Traffic Control Officers (TCOs) at key intersections proximate to RHS to manage “event surge”, attendees and public responses to modified/event-specific traffic patterns. TCOs may consist of RJUHSD staff and/or private contractors. RJUHSD should collaboratively assess and adjust the TCOs’ roles, responsibilities, and staffing needs in coordination with the City based on observations from the first-year of strategy implementation.

Special event loading zones may be considered for pre-event drop off and post-event pick up activity for a variety of vehicular travel modes outside of private automobiles. These activities are anticipated to primarily consist of transportation network companies (TNCs) and the general public. It is recommended that these loading zones be located along Berry Street to lessen impacts within Historic Sierra Vista.

RHS has approximately 180 marked parking spaces in the primary on-site event parking area between the football and baseball fields. The number of venue attendees that can be served within the main parking area will fluctuate depending on factors such as average vehicle occupancy, the duration of an event, and the arrival profile for an event. RJUHSD should collaborate with the City to establish appropriate thresholds for closing and reopening the main on-site parking area that preserve utility to the venue while reducing the propensity of inefficient circulation within and in the vicinity of this primary parking facility.

To limit the effects of events on the surrounding neighborhood, to the extent possible attendees from the east should be directed to access RHS via Yosemite Street and Sierra Boulevard. 4 Sierra Boulevard, between Sequioa
Street and Mariposa Street
30 30 38 42
6 Alta Vista Avenue, between Las Flores
Avenue and Sierra Boulevard - 16 25 29
ID Location Average Speed
(MPH)
85th % Speed
(MPH)
95th % Speed
(MPH)
Posted Speed
(MPH)
Addendum Attachment 3

Campo Street Abandonment Page 7 of 8
Traffic Evaluation July 31, 2025
RJUHSD may consider facilitating additional parking for “large” events. These events should be identified in advance during regularly scheduled meetings between RJUHSD and the City. The primary locations for additional parking may be the Tiger Way RHS parking lot, the Tiger Way Independence High School parking lot, and the RHS Berry Lot.

RHS is neighbored by the Historic Sierra Vista community to the immediate west. As RHS hosts “large” events, a dynamic may develop where in attendees familiar with the surrounding area may park in the residential development adjacent to the main parking area and enter the venue on foot. The City should monitor complaints/feedback from these adjacent residents regarding off-site parking adversely affecting living conditions and violating existing parking restrictions currently in place along Alta Vista Avenue, Sierra Boulevard, and Las Flores Avenue.

All stakeholders involved (RJUHSD and the City) should meet in advance of upcoming scheduled events at RHS to ensure that appropriate TMP measures are being considered in advance of all event sizes. This regular coordination will enable all stakeholders to properly allocate available resources and provide sufficient notice to both affected members of the general public and potential attendees.

Conclusions
The following are the primary conclusions based on the analyses discussed herein:
 The existing Trip Distribution reflects dominant usage of Sierra Boulevard – Traffic data and field observations from Tuesday, March 18, 2025, indicate that Sierra Boulevard is the primary route for vehicles accessing the RHS parking lot via Campo Street. This finding is consistent with expectations based on the existing RHS student attendance boundaries.  The prevailing drop-off/pick-up conditions proximate to RHS vary – Vehicles arriving along Alta Vista Avenue, Sierra Boulevard, and Las Flores Avenue exhibit a wide variety of driver behaviors.

There are observed instances of parking in bike lanes and u-turns along these roadways during the AM drop-off and PM pick-up periods.
 The neighborhood roadway segments are not expected to operate beyond capacity assuming permanent closure of Campo Street – The assumed addition of project event trips on the roadway segments proximate to Campo Street is not anticipated to result in the neighborhood roads operating beyond their functional capacity.
 The prevailing roadway segment speeds collected are higher than posted – The prevailing Daily, AM Peak, and PM Peak speeds measured on Sierra Boulevard are higher than posted speed limits.
 RJUHSD may consider implementing TMP strategies during larger events – RJUHSD should consider drawing from the TMP strategies provided in this memorandum to facilitate orderly access to and from the site during large events. RJUHSD should collaborate with the City to ensure that desirable strategies intended to handle “event surge” and minimize the effects of closing Campo Street are implemented as appropriate.

Addendum Attachment 3

Campo Street Abandonment Page 8 of 8
Traffic Evaluation July 31, 2025
Attachments
Exhibit 1 – Project Vicinity Map
Exhibit 2 – Project Trip Distribution
Exhibit 3 – Existing (2025) and Existing (2025) plus Project Daily Segment Traffic Volumes Attachment A – 2024 Roseville High School Football Game Ticket Data Attachment B – Traffic Count Data Sheets
Addendum Attachment 3

Atlantic St
Las Flores Ave
Berry St
Tiger Wy
Campo St
Coronado Ave
Tahoe Ave
Sierra Blvd
Mariposa St
Sequoia St
Alta Vista Ave
Yosemite St
Roseville
High School
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 Project Location
Study Roadway
Segment
#
LEGEND

NOT TO SCALE
Exhibit 1
Project Vicinity Map
Roseville Campo Street Abandonment
Addendum Attachment 3

Atlantic St
Las Flores Ave
Berry St
Tiger Wy
Campo St
Coronado Ave
Tahoe Ave
Sierra Blvd
Mariposa St
Sequoia St
Alta Vista Ave
Yosemite St
Roseville
High School
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 Project Location
Study Roadway
Segment
#
LEGEND
XX% Home Distribution
XX% Visitor Distribution
35%
45%
20%
10%
50%
40%

NOT TO SCALE
Exhibit 2
Project Trip Distribution
Roseville Campo Street Abandonment
Addendum Attachment 3

LEGEND
##
Existing/Existing+Project
Daily Traffic Volumes
XX/YY
Project Location
Study Roadway
Segment
#
1 Campo St
Coronado Ave
Tahoe Ave Tiger Wy
Sequoia St
Mariposa St
Sierra Blvd
4 1934/2141
1632/2098
Alta Vista Ave
Sierra Blvd
5Las Flores Ave
2 Las Flores Ave
Coronado Ave
Sierra Blvd
3 Las Flores Ave
Sierra Blvd
Alta Vista Ave
Sierra Blvd
Alta Vista Ave
6Las Flores Ave
7 Campo St
Sierra Blvd
1215/1422
473/473
1083/1756 624/987
1350/2386
Campo St
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 Sierra Blvd
Alta Vista Ave
Las Flores Ave
Coronado Ave
Mariposa St
Sequioa St
Exhibit 3
Existing (2025) and Existing (2025) plus Project Daily Segment Traffic Volumes Roseville Campo Street Abandonment

NOT TO SCALE
Addendum Attachment 3

Campo Street Abandonment
Traffic Evaluation
Attachment A
2024 Roseville High School Football Game Ticket Data
Addendum Attachment 3

2 Thanks,
Scott Davis
Director, Facilities Development
Roseville Joint Union High School District
(916) 782-4707 x1213 / [email protected]
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Wilson, Jason <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 1:04 PM
Subject: Football Attendance
To: Scott Davis <[email protected]>
Cc: Ashley Serin <[email protected]>
Good afternoon Scott,
Here are the numbers of tickets sold for each football event:

Date Total Tickets Type H/V % Home Visitor
8/29/24 236 Freshman 65/35 153 83
8/30/2024 1271 JV/Varsity 65/35 826 445
9/19/2024 239 Freshman 65/35 155 84
9/20/2024 1235 JV/Varsity 65/35 802 433
10/10/2024 189 Freshman 70/30 132 57
10/11/2024 1130 JV/Varsity 70/30 791 339
10/24/2024 197 Freshman 60/40 118 79
10/25/2024 1290 JV/Varsity 60/40 774 516
11/1/2024 1542 Fr/JV/Varsity 60/40 925 617
These are estimates as we do not have exact home and visitor numbers. I also believe these are more on the high side. I would argue that most of our gates are more like a 70/30 split with our rivals being more like 65/35 or 60/40, like in the case of hosting Woodcreek
JW
--
Jason Wilson
Assistant Principal
Athletics Administrator
Roseville High School
(916) 782-3753
"I lead to foster meaningful life experiences and develop lasting relationships with our students and staff through respect, integrity, and resiliency."
Addendum Attachment 3

Campo Street Abandonment
Traffic Evaluation
Attachment B
Traffic Count Data Sheets
Addendum Attachment 3

Day: Tuesday City: Roseville
Date: Project #: CA25_070070_001
NB SB EB WB Total
1,168 766 0 0 1,934

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 0 0 0 12:00 11 3 14 00:00 01:00 1 1 2
0:15 0 0 0 12:15 14 7 21 01:00 02:00 3 0 3
0:30 0 0 0 12:30 16 7 23 02:00 03:00 0 1 1
0:45 1 1 2 12:45 12 4 16 03:00 04:00 1 1 2
1:00 2 0 2 13:00 12 10 22 04:00 05:00 0 1 1
1:15 1 0 1 13:15 19 11 30 05:00 06:00 3 13 16
1:30 0 0 0 13:30 19 12 31 06:00 07:00 14 18 32
1:45 0 0 0 13:45 21 8 29 07:00 08:00 44 51 95
2:00 0 0 0 14:00 16 20 36 08:00 09:00 97 82 179
2:15 0 0 0 14:15 21 9 30 09:00 10:00 23 30 53
2:30 0 0 0 14:30 28 8 36 10:00 11:00 29 23 52
2:45 0 1 1 14:45 26 9 35 11:00 12:00 33 26 59
3:00 0 0 0 15:00 31 4 35 12:00 13:00 53 21 74
3:15 0 0 0 15:15 47 35 82 13:00 14:00 71 41 112
3:30 1 1 2 15:30 57 23 80 14:00 15:00 91 46 137
3:45 0 0 0 15:45 35 15 50 15:00 16:00 170 77 247
4:00 0 0 0 16:00 56 10 66 16:00 17:00 155 37 192
4:15 0 0 0 16:15 33 6 39 17:00 18:00 139 92 231
4:30 0 0 0 16:30 29 9 38 18:00 19:00 84 101 185
4:45 0 1 1 16:45 37 12 49 19:00 20:00 52 29 81
5:00 0 0 0 17:00 32 10 42 20:00 21:00 43 32 75
5:15 2 4 6 17:15 37 22 59 21:00 22:00 41 30 71
5:30 0 4 4 17:30 33 20 53 22:00 23:00 15 8 23
5:45 1 5 6 17:45 37 40 77 23:00 00:00 6 5 11
6:00 2 1 3 18:00 28 52 80
6:15 4 7 11 18:15 19 17 36 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 1 4 5 18:30 15 23 38 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 7 6 13 18:45 22 9 31 248 247 495
7:00 12 10 22 19:00 10 9 19 7:45 7:45 7:45
7:15 15 10 25 19:15 13 6 19 100 94 194
7:30 7 12 19 19:30 15 9 24 0.610 0.734 0.664
7:45 10 19 29 19:45 14 5 19
8:00 41 32 73 20:00 15 3 18 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 36 26 62 20:15 11 6 17 920 519 1439
8:30 13 17 30 20:30 11 22 33 15:15 17:15 15:15
8:45 7 7 14 20:45 6 1 7 195 134 278
9:00 4 10 14 21:00 19 7 26 0.855 0.644 0.848
9:15 4 6 10 21:15 13 12 25
9:30 9 7 16 21:30 3 6 9 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 6 7 13 21:45 6 5 11 141 133 274
10:00 9 6 15 22:00 6 3 9 7:45 7:45 7:45
10:15 6 5 11 22:15 6 1 7 100 94 194
10:30 6 5 11 22:30 2 1 3 0.610 0.734 0.664
10:45 8 7 15 22:45 1 3 4
11:00 7 8 15 23:00 6 4 10 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 6 7 13 23:15 0 1 1 294 129 423
11:30 12 7 19 23:30 0 0 0 16:00 17:00 17:00
11:45 8 4 12 23:45 0 0 0 155 92 231
TOTALS 248 247 0 0 495 TOTALS 920 519 0 0 1439 0.692 0.575 0.750 SPLIT % 50% 50% 0% 0% 26% SPLIT % 64% 36% 0% 0% 74%
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Campo St S/O Coronado Ave
3/18/2025

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15-Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140
160
180 00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00

NB SB EB WB
Addendum Attachment 3

Day: Tuesday City: Roseville
Date: Project #: CA25_070070_002
NB SB EB WB Total
694 521 0 0 1,215

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 0 0 0 12:00 8 3 11 00:00 01:00 0 0 0
0:15 0 0 0 12:15 12 5 17 01:00 02:00 0 0 0
0:30 0 0 0 12:30 14 6 20 02:00 03:00 0 0 0
0:45 0 0 0 12:45 11 5 16 03:00 04:00 1 1 2
1:00 0 0 0 13:00 7 10 17 04:00 05:00 0 0 0
1:15 0 0 0 13:15 19 9 28 05:00 06:00 1 7 8
1:30 0 0 0 13:30 20 12 32 06:00 07:00 9 12 21
1:45 0 0 0 13:45 16 9 25 07:00 08:00 41 53 94
2:00 0 0 0 14:00 11 21 32 08:00 09:00 85 107 192
2:15 0 0 0 14:15 20 7 27 09:00 10:00 18 24 42
2:30 0 0 0 14:30 27 8 35 10:00 11:00 20 19 39
2:45 0 0 0 14:45 20 5 25 11:00 12:00 29 21 50
3:00 0 0 0 15:00 17 10 27 12:00 13:00 45 19 64
3:15 0 0 0 15:15 35 32 67 13:00 14:00 62 40 102
3:30 1 1 2 15:30 45 22 67 14:00 15:00 78 41 119
3:45 0 0 0 15:45 31 14 45 15:00 16:00 128 78 206
4:00 0 0 0 16:00 48 7 55 16:00 17:00 71 25 96
4:15 0 0 0 16:15 11 7 18 17:00 18:00 37 25 62
4:30 0 0 0 16:30 6 7 13 18:00 19:00 26 20 46
4:45 0 0 0 16:45 6 4 10 19:00 20:00 10 9 19
5:00 0 0 0 17:00 7 2 9 20:00 21:00 20 7 27
5:15 1 2 3 17:15 7 8 15 21:00 22:00 9 10 19
5:30 0 2 2 17:30 10 6 16 22:00 23:00 2 1 3
5:45 0 3 3 17:45 13 9 22 23:00 00:00 2 2 4
6:00 1 2 3 18:00 13 9 22
6:15 3 3 6 18:15 3 5 8 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 0 4 4 18:30 6 3 9 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 5 3 8 18:45 4 3 7 204 244 448
7:00 11 9 20 19:00 3 2 5 7:45 7:45 7:45
7:15 12 10 22 19:15 2 2 4 91 126 217
7:30 7 13 20 19:30 4 3 7 0.599 0.670 0.662
7:45 11 21 32 19:45 1 2 3
8:00 31 47 78 20:00 3 2 5 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 38 44 82 20:15 9 4 13 490 277 767
8:30 11 14 25 20:30 5 1 6 15:15 15:00 15:15
8:45 5 2 7 20:45 3 0 3 159 78 234
9:00 2 10 12 21:00 6 4 10 0.828 0.609 0.873
9:15 5 5 10 21:15 2 4 6
9:30 4 4 8 21:30 0 1 1 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 7 5 12 21:45 1 1 2 126 160 286
10:00 5 7 12 22:00 2 0 2 7:45 7:45 7:45
10:15 6 3 9 22:15 0 0 0 91 126 217
10:30 4 5 9 22:30 0 1 1 0.599 0.670 0.662
10:45 5 4 9 22:45 0 0 0
11:00 3 6 9 23:00 1 2 3 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 8 6 14 23:15 0 0 0 108 50 158
11:30 10 5 15 23:30 0 0 0 16:00 16:00 16:00
11:45 8 4 12 23:45 1 0 1 71 25 96
TOTALS 204 244 0 0 448 TOTALS 490 277 0 0 767 0.370 0.893 0.436 SPLIT % 46% 54% 0% 0% 37% SPLIT % 64% 36% 0% 0% 63%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Las Flores Ave Bet Coronado Ave & Sierra Blvd
3/18/2025

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15-Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140 00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00

NB SB EB WB
Addendum Attachment 3

Day: Tuesday City: Roseville
Date: Project #: CA25_070070_003
NB SB EB WB Total
240 233 0 0 473

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 0 0 0 12:00 4 1 5 00:00 01:00 0 0 0
0:15 0 0 0 12:15 8 1 9 01:00 02:00 0 0 0
0:30 0 0 0 12:30 8 3 11 02:00 03:00 0 0 0
0:45 0 0 0 12:45 7 2 9 03:00 04:00 0 0 0
1:00 0 0 0 13:00 5 3 8 04:00 05:00 0 1 1
1:15 0 0 0 13:15 10 3 13 05:00 06:00 0 6 6
1:30 0 0 0 13:30 7 6 13 06:00 07:00 7 10 17
1:45 0 0 0 13:45 11 4 15 07:00 08:00 11 22 33
2:00 0 0 0 14:00 6 7 13 08:00 09:00 24 55 79
2:15 0 0 0 14:15 6 2 8 09:00 10:00 4 14 18
2:30 0 0 0 14:30 10 4 14 10:00 11:00 9 6 15
2:45 0 0 0 14:45 10 2 12 11:00 12:00 11 15 26
3:00 0 0 0 15:00 5 3 8 12:00 13:00 27 7 34
3:15 0 0 0 15:15 7 17 24 13:00 14:00 33 16 49
3:30 0 0 0 15:30 19 10 29 14:00 15:00 32 15 47
3:45 0 0 0 15:45 7 3 10 15:00 16:00 38 33 71
4:00 0 0 0 16:00 10 1 11 16:00 17:00 13 5 18
4:15 0 1 1 16:15 0 2 2 17:00 18:00 8 12 20
4:30 0 0 0 16:30 2 1 3 18:00 19:00 9 11 20
4:45 0 0 0 16:45 1 1 2 19:00 20:00 0 3 3
5:00 0 0 0 17:00 0 1 1 20:00 21:00 9 0 9
5:15 0 2 2 17:15 1 5 6 21:00 22:00 3 2 5
5:30 0 1 1 17:30 5 2 7 22:00 23:00 0 0 0
5:45 0 3 3 17:45 2 4 6 23:00 00:00 2 0 2
6:00 1 2 3 18:00 7 3 10
6:15 3 3 6 18:15 0 3 3 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 1 2 3 18:30 0 2 2 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 2 3 5 18:45 2 3 5 66 129 195
7:00 1 3 4 19:00 0 1 1 7:30 7:45 7:30
7:15 1 3 4 19:15 0 0 0 27 64 90
7:30 5 7 12 19:30 0 1 1 0.614 0.571 0.577
7:45 4 9 13 19:45 0 1 1
8:00 7 19 26 20:00 2 0 2 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 11 28 39 20:15 2 0 2 174 104 278
8:30 2 8 10 20:30 4 0 4 15:15 15:00 15:15
8:45 4 0 4 20:45 1 0 1 43 33 74
9:00 0 6 6 21:00 2 0 2 0.566 0.485 0.638
9:15 0 2 2 21:15 1 2 3
9:30 2 3 5 21:30 0 0 0 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 2 3 5 21:45 0 0 0 35 77 112
10:00 3 2 5 22:00 0 0 0 7:30 7:45 7:30
10:15 2 1 3 22:15 0 0 0 27 64 90
10:30 2 2 4 22:30 0 0 0 0.614 0.571 0.577
10:45 2 1 3 22:45 0 0 0
11:00 1 5 6 23:00 1 0 1 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 4 4 8 23:15 0 0 0 21 17 38
11:30 4 5 9 23:30 0 0 0 16:00 17:00 17:00
11:45 2 1 3 23:45 1 0 1 13 12 20
TOTALS 66 129 0 0 195 TOTALS 174 104 0 0 278 0.325 0.600 0.714 SPLIT % 34% 66% 0% 0% 41% SPLIT % 63% 37% 0% 0% 59%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Las Flores Ave Bet Sierra Blvd & Alta Vista Ave
3/18/2025

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15-Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00

NB SB EB WB
Addendum Attachment 3

Day: Tuesday City: Roseville
Date: Project #: CA25_070070_004
NB SB EB WB Total
0 0 773 859 1,632

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 1 0 1 12:00 8 5 13 00:00 01:00 2 1 3
0:15 1 0 1 12:15 3 5 8 01:00 02:00 0 1 1
0:30 0 0 0 12:30 3 12 15 02:00 03:00 0 0 0
0:45 0 1 1 12:45 2 5 7 03:00 04:00 3 1 4
1:00 0 0 0 13:00 6 6 12 04:00 05:00 0 3 3
1:15 0 0 0 13:15 9 14 23 05:00 06:00 4 3 7
1:30 0 0 0 13:30 5 10 15 06:00 07:00 6 7 13
1:45 0 1 1 13:45 11 14 25 07:00 08:00 76 44 120
2:00 0 0 0 14:00 10 21 31 08:00 09:00 193 103 296
2:15 0 0 0 14:15 11 9 20 09:00 10:00 26 19 45
2:30 0 0 0 14:30 7 10 17 10:00 11:00 19 22 41
2:45 0 0 0 14:45 20 12 32 11:00 12:00 19 30 49
3:00 0 0 0 15:00 28 10 38 12:00 13:00 16 27 43
3:15 0 0 0 15:15 35 70 105 13:00 14:00 31 44 75
3:30 2 1 3 15:30 22 43 65 14:00 15:00 48 52 100
3:45 1 0 1 15:45 20 15 35 15:00 16:00 105 138 243
4:00 0 1 1 16:00 20 21 41 16:00 17:00 59 71 130
4:15 0 1 1 16:15 11 22 33 17:00 18:00 54 92 146
4:30 0 0 0 16:30 15 15 30 18:00 19:00 47 88 135
4:45 0 1 1 16:45 13 13 26 19:00 20:00 26 37 63
5:00 0 0 0 17:00 9 14 23 20:00 21:00 24 44 68
5:15 1 2 3 17:15 20 31 51 21:00 22:00 8 26 34
5:30 1 1 2 17:30 14 18 32 22:00 23:00 5 6 11
5:45 2 0 2 17:45 11 29 40 23:00 00:00 2 0 2
6:00 0 1 1 18:00 11 31 42
6:15 0 0 0 18:15 10 14 24 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 4 3 7 18:30 13 26 39 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 2 3 5 18:45 13 17 30 348 234 582
7:00 18 7 25 19:00 7 14 21 7:45 7:45 7:45
7:15 9 15 24 19:15 10 7 17 226 112 338
7:30 15 9 24 19:30 4 8 12 0.665 0.528 0.612
7:45 34 13 47 19:45 5 8 13
8:00 83 30 113 20:00 7 7 14 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 85 53 138 20:15 7 14 21 425 625 1050
8:30 24 16 40 20:30 3 14 17 14:45 15:15 15:15
8:45 1 4 5 20:45 7 9 16 105 149 246
9:00 9 2 11 21:00 3 10 13 0.750 0.532 0.586
9:15 4 8 12 21:15 2 10 12
9:30 6 2 8 21:30 1 2 3 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 7 7 14 21:45 2 4 6 269 147 416
10:00 7 3 10 22:00 0 3 3 7:45 7:45 7:45
10:15 3 6 9 22:15 2 2 4 226 112 338
10:30 3 6 9 22:30 1 0 1 0.665 0.528 0.612
10:45 6 7 13 22:45 2 1 3
11:00 6 4 10 23:00 1 0 1 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 4 5 9 23:15 0 0 0 113 163 276
11:30 4 16 20 23:30 0 0 0 16:00 17:00 17:00
11:45 5 5 10 23:45 1 0 1 59 92 146
TOTALS 0 0 348 234 582 TOTALS 0 0 425 625 1050 0.738 0.742 0.716 SPLIT % 0% 0% 60% 40% 36% SPLIT % 0% 0% 40% 60% 64%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Sierra Blvd Bet Sequioa St & Mariposa St
3/18/2025

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15-Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 50
100
150
200
250 00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00

NB SB EB WB
Addendum Attachment 3

Day: Tuesday City: Roseville
Date: Project #: CA25_070070_004
5 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 5 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 5 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 99 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 99 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 99 0:00 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5:00 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 6:00 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 4 1 2 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 7:00 0 11 2 5 22 22 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 76 0 9 5 8 15 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 0 20 7 13 37 28 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 120 8:00 1 10 7 23 81 52 15 4 0 0 0 0 0 193 1 20 13 21 31 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 103 2 30 20 44 112 68 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 296 9:00 1 6 5 2 2 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 2 3 3 5 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 3 9 8 7 5 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 10:00 2 3 0 4 4 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 19 3 4 5 3 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 5 7 5 7 10 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 41 11:00 2 5 2 1 3 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 2 8 3 5 5 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 4 13 5 6 8 7 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 12:00 0 0 1 4 5 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 1 7 2 6 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 1 7 3 10 11 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 13:00 3 6 3 2 3 10 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 31 1 3 6 13 12 3 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 44 4 9 9 15 15 13 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 75 14:00 2 13 7 3 9 9 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 48 2 16 5 9 14 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 4 29 12 12 23 13 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 100 15:00 2 13 4 5 31 34 12 4 0 0 0 0 0 105 3 19 13 48 35 16 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 138 5 32 17 53 66 50 15 5 0 0 0 0 0 243 16:00 3 9 5 4 10 16 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 59 0 10 5 11 26 16 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 3 19 10 15 36 32 11 4 0 0 0 0 0 130 17:00 0 7 3 3 15 18 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 54 1 5 8 13 39 22 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 92 1 12 11 16 54 40 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 146 18:00 0 5 2 0 13 17 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 47 1 9 6 14 32 21 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 88 1 14 8 14 45 38 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 135 19:00 1 1 2 4 3 9 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 26 4 1 1 9 14 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 5 2 3 13 17 15 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 63 20:00 0 3 3 5 7 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 2 4 3 16 13 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 2 7 6 21 20 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 21:00 1 1 0 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 2 2 10 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 1 3 2 12 10 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 22:00 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 2 2 2 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 23:00 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Totals 23 99 48 70 211 215 86 21 0 0 0 0 0 773 28 126 84 194 263 133 27 4 0 0 0 0 0 859 51 225 132 264 474 348 113 25 0 0 0 0 0 1,632 % of Totals 3% 13% 6% 9% 27% 28% 11% 3% 100% 3% 15% 10% 23% 31% 15% 3% 0% 100% 3% 14% 8% 16% 29% 21% 7% 2% 100% 00:00 - 12:00 10 37 17 37 114 89 38 6 0 0 0 0 0 348 12 50 32 44 61 31 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 234 22 87 49 81 175 120 42 6 0 0 0 0 0 582 % 1% 5% 2% 5% 15% 12% 5% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 45% 2% 6% 4% 6% 8% 4% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 30% 3% 11% 6% 10% 23% 16% 5% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 75% Peak Hour 10:15 7:45 7:30 7:30 7:30 7:45 7:45 7:45 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 7:45 9:30 7:30 7:30 7:45 7:45 7:45 10:45 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 7:45 9:30 7:30 7:30 7:45 7:45 7:45 7:45 7:45 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 7:45 Peak Volume 3 16 9 24 89 64 20 4 0 0 0 0 0 226 4 24 13 23 35 17 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 112 6 39 22 47 124 81 21 4 0 0 0 0 0 338 12:00 - 24:00 13 62 31 33 97 126 48 15 0 0 0 0 0 425 16 76 52 150 202 102 23 4 0 0 0 0 0 625 29 138 83 183 299 228 71 19 0 0 0 0 0 1050 % 2% 8% 4% 4% 13% 16% 6% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 55% 2% 10% 7% 19% 26% 13% 3% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 81% 4% 18% 11% 24% 39% 29% 9% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 136% Peak Hour 14:45 14:30 14:00 19:15 15:00 15:00 15:00 15:15 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 14:45 18:45 14:45 14:45 14:45 15:15 17:45 13:00 17:45 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 15:15 14:45 14:45 14:45 14:45 15:15 15:00 15:00 15:15 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 15:15 Peak Volume 4 19 7 6 31 34 12 6 0 0 0 0 0 105 4 24 14 50 44 26 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 149 7 40 20 55 71 50 15 7 0 0 0 0 0 246 07:00 - 09:00 1 21 9 28 103 74 28 5 0 0 0 0 0 269 1 29 18 29 46 22 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 147 2 50 27 57 149 96 30 5 0 0 0 0 0 416 % 0% 3% 1% 4% 13% 10% 4% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 35% 0% 4% 2% 4% 6% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 19% 0% 6% 3% 7% 19% 12% 4% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 54% Peak Hour 7:45 7:45 7:30 7:30 7:30 7:45 7:45 7:45 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:45 7:30 7:30 7:30 7:45 7:45 7:45 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:45 7:45 7:30 7:30 7:45 7:45 7:45 7:45 7:45 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:45 Peak Volume 1 16 9 24 89 64 20 4 0 0 0 0 0 226 1 24 13 23 35 17 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 112 2 39 22 47 124 81 21 4 0 0 0 0 0 338 16:00 - 18:00 3 16 8 7 25 34 15 5 0 0 0 0 0 113 1 15 13 24 65 38 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 163 4 31 21 31 90 72 21 6 0 0 0 0 0 276 % 0% 2% 1% 1% 3% 4% 2% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 15% 0% 2% 2% 3% 8% 5% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 21% 1% 4% 3% 4% 12% 9% 3% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 36% Peak Hour 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 17:00 16:45 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:45 16:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 16:30 17:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 17:00 16:00 16:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 16:30 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 17:00 Peak Volume 3 9 5 4 15 19 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 59 1 10 8 13 39 22 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 92 3 19 11 16 54 40 12 4 0 0 0 0 0 146 EASTBOUND 20 33 32 40 44 773
859
TOTALS 19 32 30 38 42 1632
WESTBOUND 19 30 29 36 40 HOURLY BREAKDOWN STATISTICS
Direction Percentiles
15th 50th Average 85th 95th ADT
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
SPEED
Sierra Blvd Bet Sequioa St & Mariposa St
3/18/2025
Time

EASTBOUND
Total

WESTBOUND
Total
TOTALS
Total
Addendum Attachment 3

Day: Tuesday City: Roseville
Date: Project #: CA25_070070_005
NB SB EB WB Total
0 0 607 476 1,083

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 0 0 0 12:00 5 3 8 00:00 01:00 1 1 2
0:15 1 0 1 12:15 4 6 10 01:00 02:00 0 0 0
0:30 0 0 0 12:30 2 3 5 02:00 03:00 0 0 0
0:45 0 1 1 12:45 1 1 2 03:00 04:00 0 0 0
1:00 0 0 0 13:00 2 4 6 04:00 05:00 0 0 0
1:15 0 0 0 13:15 4 4 8 05:00 06:00 1 0 1
1:30 0 0 0 13:30 5 5 10 06:00 07:00 5 1 6
1:45 0 0 0 13:45 6 14 20 07:00 08:00 75 39 114
2:00 0 0 0 14:00 1 12 13 08:00 09:00 154 39 193
2:15 0 0 0 14:15 8 1 9 09:00 10:00 11 4 15
2:30 0 0 0 14:30 12 4 16 10:00 11:00 10 10 20
2:45 0 0 0 14:45 15 2 17 11:00 12:00 10 5 15
3:00 0 0 0 15:00 25 3 28 12:00 13:00 12 13 25
3:15 0 0 0 15:15 30 48 78 13:00 14:00 17 27 44
3:30 0 0 0 15:30 34 33 67 14:00 15:00 36 19 55
3:45 0 0 0 15:45 31 12 43 15:00 16:00 120 96 216
4:00 0 0 0 16:00 37 10 47 16:00 17:00 53 28 81
4:15 0 0 0 16:15 4 9 13 17:00 18:00 36 60 96
4:30 0 0 0 16:30 5 5 10 18:00 19:00 31 60 91
4:45 0 0 0 16:45 7 4 11 19:00 20:00 18 21 39
5:00 0 0 0 17:00 8 7 15 20:00 21:00 11 27 38
5:15 1 0 1 17:15 9 17 26 21:00 22:00 6 22 28
5:30 0 0 0 17:30 11 12 23 22:00 23:00 0 2 2
5:45 0 0 0 17:45 8 24 32 23:00 00:00 0 2 2
6:00 0 1 1 18:00 5 21 26
6:15 0 0 0 18:15 6 8 14 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 1 0 1 18:30 9 21 30 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 4 0 4 18:45 11 10 21 267 99 366
7:00 26 9 35 19:00 8 9 17 7:45 7:45 7:45
7:15 19 18 37 19:15 6 4 10 179 48 227
7:30 5 2 7 19:30 1 2 3 0.589 0.571 0.585
7:45 25 10 35 19:45 3 6 9
8:00 67 14 81 20:00 3 5 8 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 76 21 97 20:15 2 6 8 340 377 717
8:30 11 3 14 20:30 1 12 13 15:15 15:15 15:15
8:45 0 1 1 20:45 5 4 9 132 103 235
9:00 5 2 7 21:00 4 11 15 0.892 0.536 0.753
9:15 2 1 3 21:15 1 8 9
9:30 2 0 2 21:30 1 1 2 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 2 1 3 21:45 0 2 2 229 78 307
10:00 2 3 5 22:00 0 1 1 7:45 7:45 7:45
10:15 4 3 7 22:15 0 1 1 179 48 227
10:30 2 2 4 22:30 0 0 0 0.589 0.571 0.585
10:45 2 2 4 22:45 0 0 0
11:00 1 1 2 23:00 0 2 2 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 4 2 6 23:15 0 0 0 89 88 177
11:30 2 0 2 23:30 0 0 0 16:00 17:00 17:00
11:45 3 2 5 23:45 0 0 0 53 60 96
TOTALS 0 0 267 99 366 TOTALS 0 0 340 377 717 0.358 0.625 0.750 SPLIT % 0% 0% 73% 27% 34% SPLIT % 0% 0% 47% 53% 66%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Sierra Blvd Bet Las Flores Ave & Alta Vista Ave
3/18/2025

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15-Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140
160
180 00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00

NB SB EB WB
Addendum Attachment 3

Day: Tuesday City: Roseville
Date: Project #: CA25_070070_006
NB SB EB WB Total
0 0 306 318 624

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 0 0 0 12:00 1 0 1 00:00 01:00 0 1 1
0:15 0 0 0 12:15 0 1 1 01:00 02:00 0 0 0
0:30 0 1 1 12:30 1 2 3 02:00 03:00 0 0 0
0:45 0 0 0 12:45 0 0 0 03:00 04:00 0 0 0
1:00 0 0 0 13:00 0 1 1 04:00 05:00 0 0 0
1:15 0 0 0 13:15 1 1 2 05:00 06:00 1 1 2
1:30 0 0 0 13:30 4 0 4 06:00 07:00 2 2 4
1:45 0 0 0 13:45 3 10 13 07:00 08:00 22 8 30
2:00 0 0 0 14:00 0 3 3 08:00 09:00 129 14 143
2:15 0 0 0 14:15 0 0 0 09:00 10:00 0 2 2
2:30 0 0 0 14:30 7 2 9 10:00 11:00 2 1 3
2:45 0 0 0 14:45 2 2 4 11:00 12:00 2 3 5
3:00 0 0 0 15:00 3 3 6 12:00 13:00 2 3 5
3:15 0 0 0 15:15 18 37 55 13:00 14:00 8 12 20
3:30 0 0 0 15:30 6 13 19 14:00 15:00 9 7 16
3:45 0 0 0 15:45 7 3 10 15:00 16:00 34 56 90
4:00 0 0 0 16:00 9 3 12 16:00 17:00 50 36 86
4:15 0 0 0 16:15 5 6 11 17:00 18:00 23 48 71
4:30 0 0 0 16:30 23 15 38 18:00 19:00 11 48 59
4:45 0 0 0 16:45 13 12 25 19:00 20:00 4 32 36
5:00 0 0 0 17:00 11 11 22 20:00 21:00 3 17 20
5:15 1 0 1 17:15 3 16 19 21:00 22:00 2 21 23
5:30 0 0 0 17:30 6 8 14 22:00 23:00 2 6 8
5:45 0 1 1 17:45 3 13 16 23:00 00:00 0 0 0
6:00 0 0 0 18:00 6 15 21
6:15 1 1 2 18:15 0 8 8 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 0 0 0 18:30 0 10 10 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 1 1 2 18:45 5 15 20 158 32 190
7:00 6 2 8 19:00 2 13 15 7:45 7:30 7:45
7:15 6 4 10 19:15 0 6 6 138 16 154
7:30 1 0 1 19:30 1 8 9 0.500 0.571 0.507
7:45 9 2 11 19:45 1 5 6
8:00 58 7 65 20:00 1 4 5 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 69 7 76 20:15 1 3 4 148 286 434
8:30 2 0 2 20:30 1 8 9 16:15 15:00 16:30
8:45 0 0 0 20:45 0 2 2 52 56 104
9:00 0 2 2 21:00 1 12 13 0.565 0.378 0.684
9:15 0 0 0 21:15 0 6 6
9:30 0 0 0 21:30 1 1 2 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 0 0 0 21:45 0 2 2 151 22 173
10:00 0 0 0 22:00 1 2 3 7:45 7:30 7:45
10:15 1 0 1 22:15 0 2 2 138 16 154
10:30 0 1 1 22:30 0 2 2 0.500 0.571 0.507
10:45 1 0 1 22:45 1 0 1
11:00 0 1 1 23:00 0 0 0 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 0 2 2 23:15 0 0 0 73 84 157
11:30 0 0 0 23:30 0 0 0 16:15 16:30 16:30
11:45 2 0 2 23:45 0 0 0 52 54 104
TOTALS 0 0 158 32 190 TOTALS 0 0 148 286 434 0.565 0.844 0.684 SPLIT % 0% 0% 83% 17% 30% SPLIT % 0% 0% 34% 66% 70%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Alta Vista Ave Bet Las Flores Ave & Sierra Blvd
3/18/2025

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15-Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140 00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00

NB SB EB WB
Addendum Attachment 3

Day: Tuesday City: Roseville
Date: Project #: CA25_070070_006
5 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 5 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 5 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 99 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 99 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 99 0:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6:00 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 7:00 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 2 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 24 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 8:00 118 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 129 6 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 124 17 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 143 9:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 10:00 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 11:00 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 12:00 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 13:00 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 2 4 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 8 2 4 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 14:00 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 2 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 10 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 15:00 31 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 10 20 15 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 41 23 15 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 16:00 46 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 8 18 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 46 12 18 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 86 17:00 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 4 25 17 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 23 4 25 17 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 18:00 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 3 12 22 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 14 12 22 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 19:00 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 3 16 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 6 3 16 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 20:00 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 8 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 3 2 8 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 21:00 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 3 9 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 3 3 9 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 22:00 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 2 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals 287 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 306 28 67 131 73 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 318 315 86 131 73 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 624 % of Totals 94% 6% 100% 9% 21% 41% 23% 6% 100% 50% 14% 21% 12% 3% 100% 00:00 - 12:00 147 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 158 9 11 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 156 22 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 190 % 48% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 52% 3% 4% 3% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 10% 51% 7% 3% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 62% Peak Hour 7:45 7:30 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 7:45 7:30 7:30 6:30 7:15 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 7:30 7:45 7:30 6:30 7:15 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 7:45 Peak Volume 127 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 138 8 6 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 135 17 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 154 12:00 - 24:00 140 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 148 19 56 122 70 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 286 159 64 122 70 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 434 % 46% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 48% 6% 18% 40% 23% 6% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 93% 52% 21% 40% 23% 6% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 142% Peak Hour 16:15 15:45 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 16:15 14:30 15:00 17:15 17:15 19:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 15:00 16:15 15:00 17:15 17:15 19:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 16:30 Peak Volume 48 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 11 20 27 18 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 48 23 27 18 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 104 07:00 - 09:00 140 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 151 8 7 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 148 18 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 173 % 46% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 49% 3% 2% 2% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 7% 48% 6% 2% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 57% Peak Hour 7:45 7:30 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:45 7:30 7:30 7:00 7:15 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:30 7:45 7:30 7:00 7:15 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:45 Peak Volume 127 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 138 8 6 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 135 17 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 154 16:00 - 18:00 69 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 0 12 43 26 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 84 69 16 43 26 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 157 % 23% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 24% 0% 4% 14% 8% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 27% 23% 5% 14% 8% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 51% Peak Hour 16:15 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:15 16:00 16:00 16:30 16:30 16:15 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:30 16:15 16:00 16:30 16:30 16:15 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:30 Peak Volume 48 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 0 8 26 17 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 48 12 26 17 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 104 EASTBOUND 7 10 10 14 16 306
318
TOTALS 8 15 16 25 29 624
WESTBOUND 16 22 22 28 31 HOURLY BREAKDOWN STATISTICS
Direction Percentiles
15th 50th Average 85th 95th ADT
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
SPEED
Alta Vista Ave Bet Las Flores Ave & Sierra Blvd
3/18/2025
Time

EASTBOUND
Total

WESTBOUND
Total
TOTALS
Total
Addendum Attachment 3

Day: Tuesday City: Roseville
Date: Project #: CA25_070070_007
NB SB EB WB Total
782 568 0 0 1,350

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 0 0 0 12:00 0 0 0 00:00 01:00 1 2 3
0:15 0 0 0 12:15 2 0 2 01:00 02:00 1 0 1
0:30 1 1 2 12:30 2 1 3 02:00 03:00 0 0 0
0:45 0 1 1 12:45 1 1 2 03:00 04:00 0 0 0
1:00 1 0 1 13:00 0 0 0 04:00 05:00 0 0 0
1:15 0 0 0 13:15 1 0 1 05:00 06:00 0 1 1
1:30 0 0 0 13:30 6 3 9 06:00 07:00 5 0 5
1:45 0 0 0 13:45 3 21 24 07:00 08:00 79 33 112
2:00 0 0 0 14:00 0 11 11 08:00 09:00 244 11 255
2:15 0 0 0 14:15 10 3 13 09:00 10:00 4 0 4
2:30 0 0 0 14:30 13 2 15 10:00 11:00 6 3 9
2:45 0 0 0 14:45 11 2 13 11:00 12:00 4 2 6
3:00 0 0 0 15:00 13 2 15 12:00 13:00 5 2 7
3:15 0 0 0 15:15 29 58 87 13:00 14:00 10 24 34
3:30 0 0 0 15:30 30 30 60 14:00 15:00 34 18 52
3:45 0 0 0 15:45 31 9 40 15:00 16:00 103 99 202
4:00 0 0 0 16:00 42 8 50 16:00 17:00 124 31 155
4:15 0 0 0 16:15 18 7 25 17:00 18:00 64 102 166
4:30 0 0 0 16:30 33 7 40 18:00 19:00 66 135 201
4:45 0 0 0 16:45 31 9 40 19:00 20:00 22 35 57
5:00 0 0 0 17:00 22 13 35 20:00 21:00 4 49 53
5:15 0 0 0 17:15 21 20 41 21:00 22:00 5 20 25
5:30 0 0 0 17:30 15 21 36 22:00 23:00 0 0 0
5:45 0 1 1 17:45 6 48 54 23:00 00:00 1 1 2
6:00 0 0 0 18:00 18 54 72
6:15 0 0 0 18:15 16 16 32 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 1 0 1 18:30 7 41 48 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 4 0 4 18:45 25 24 49 344 52 396
7:00 27 10 37 19:00 11 22 33 7:45 7:00 7:45
7:15 26 19 45 19:15 6 4 10 265 33 278
7:30 5 2 7 19:30 2 4 6 0.506 0.434 0.511
7:45 21 2 23 19:45 3 5 8
8:00 100 2 102 20:00 0 3 3 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 131 5 136 20:15 0 5 5 438 516 954
8:30 13 4 17 20:30 1 35 36 15:15 17:45 15:15
8:45 0 0 0 20:45 3 6 9 132 159 237
9:00 1 0 1 21:00 4 19 23 0.786 0.736 0.681
9:15 1 0 1 21:15 1 1 2
9:30 1 0 1 21:30 0 0 0 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 1 0 1 21:45 0 0 0 323 44 367
10:00 0 1 1 22:00 0 0 0 7:45 7:00 7:45
10:15 4 0 4 22:15 0 0 0 265 33 278
10:30 1 1 2 22:30 0 0 0 0.506 0.434 0.511
10:45 1 1 2 22:45 0 0 0
11:00 1 1 2 23:00 1 1 2 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 0 1 1 23:15 0 0 0 188 133 321
11:30 0 0 0 23:30 0 0 0 16:00 17:00 17:00
11:45 3 0 3 23:45 0 0 0 124 102 166
TOTALS 344 52 0 0 396 TOTALS 438 516 0 0 954 0.738 0.531 0.769 SPLIT % 87% 13% 0% 0% 29% SPLIT % 46% 54% 0% 0% 71%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Campo St N/O Sierra Blvd/Alta Vista Ave
3/18/2025

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15-Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 50
100
150
200
250
300 00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00

NB SB EB WB
Addendum Attachment 3

RESOLUTION NO. 26-115

ORDERING GENERAL VACATION OF RIGHT OF WAY AND ALL OTHER INTERESTS THEREIN, IF ANY—EXCEPT FOR THE RESERVED AND EXEMPTED PUBLIC UTILITY AND EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS EASEMENTS—IN A PORTION OF THE CAMPO STREET RIGHT OF WAY, WEST OF 1 TIGER WAY; AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE A QUITCLAIM DEED AND ANY OTHER DOCUMENTS

REQUIRED TO EFFECTUATE THE TRANSFER OF THE ABANDONED RIGHT OF WAY TO THE ADJOINING SCHOOL DISTRICT SITE; FINDING THIS GENERAL VACATION TO BE IN THE CITY'S BEST INTEREST AND CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY’S GENERAL PLAN
WHEREAS, in accordance with the Streets and Highways Code, Division 9, Part 3, Chapter 3, a request from the Roseville Joint Union High School District (RJUHSD) was received by the City requesting that the City abandon a portion of Campo Street right of way (ROW), which shall become part of the Roseville High School campus, and which said portion has historically been closed from 7:30 am to 4:00 pm for, including, but not limited to, school and safety purposes, since at least 1970; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of Section 8300, et seq., of the Streets and Highways Code, proof of publication and posting of the City’s Notice of Intention to Vacate, and notice for a public hearing considering the ordering of such vacation, have occurred, and a public hearing thereon has been held as required by State law; and WHEREAS, it is hereby found that the portion of the ROW described and depicted in Exhibits A and B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, is unnecessary for present or prospective public use, but as vacated to the RJUHSD the ROW serves the community’s best interests in order to accommodate the Roseville High School Improvement Project and to ensure a safe and secure school site; and
WHEREAS, the portion of ROW, described and depicted in Exhibits A and B, consisting of 23,272 square-foot (.53 acres), was dedicated as public ROW on or about October 15, 1906, recorded at the Placer County Recorder's Office and filed for record in Book 11 of Maps, Page 18; and WHEREAS, RJUHSD submitted preliminary project plans for the Roseville High School Improvement Project; and
WHEREAS, on May 6, 2026, the City Council considered the Addendum to the Roseville High School Improvement Project Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH #2024040651, adopted May 28, 2024); and
WHEREAS, there are no plans to use the portion of ROW for any future City or public purpose, but that the City hereby reserves and exempts from this vacation process easements for public utility purposes and emergency vehicle access purposes, as further described and depicted in Exhibits C and D, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and no other utilities or facilities have been identified or will be impacted; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of Section 8320 et seq., of the Streets and Highways Code (Chapter 3, General Vacation Procedure), it is found that this ROW and any other interest, if any—except for the easements as described and depicted and reserved in Exhibits C and

D—is not needed by the City and is not being used or planned to be used in the future for street or highway purposes and will not be used for the purposes for which the City acquired it, and is unnecessary for present or prospective public street use, and shall be vacated; and WHEREAS, the portion of ROW herein described is determined to not be subject to the procedures or requirements under the California Surplus Land Act (Section 54200 et seq. of the California Government Code) pursuant to information from the California Department of Housing and Community Development, as this abandonment and quitclaim of interests is not a “disposition” under the California Surplus Land Act, and as such, this ROW area may and shall be provided to the RJUHSD pursuant to Section 4.12.110 of the Roseville Municipal Code, as real property needed by another public entity in the best interests of the City—as it provides beneficial use, creates a safe and secure school campus site, and that the subject portion of ROW is otherwise not needed by the City—and without financial consideration exchanged; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The above recitals are hereby adopted as findings and incorporated herein.

2. That the excess portion of ROW, and any other interest therein, described and depicted in Exhibits A and B, are hereby vacated and shall, save the easements described herein, as of the date of recordation of this resolution, no longer constitute City right of way.

3. The portion of subject ROW, described in Exhibits A and B, is hereby declared as surplus to the needs of the City pursuant to Section 4.12.110 of the Roseville Municipal Code and that general vacation and transfer of the property to RJUHSD is in the City's best interest, as described above; and the abandonment and conveyance of interests contemplated herein is not a disposition for the purposes of the SLA pursuant to HCD Guidelines, Section 102(i).

4. The vacation and actions contemplated herein are consistent with the City of Roseville 2035 General Plan and with Section 65402 of the Government Code and have been reviewed by the Planning Manager and staff, the City agrees with the following analysis and finds: The .53-acre segment of Campo Street proposed for abandonment includes two General Plan land use designations. Approximately .26 acres in the center of the segment has a Public/Quasi-Public (P/QP) land use designation. Approximately .27 acres of the segment to the north and south of the P/QP land use area has a Low-Density Residential (LDR) land use designation. The City of Roseville 2035 General Plan establishes the P/QP land use as area for education and other public facilities. The City of Roseville 2035 General Plan establishes public and private schools as a secondary use in the LDR land use area. City Council of the City of Roseville, as the legislative body of the local planning agency—the City of Roseville—finds that this vacation and contemplated actions are consistent with the City of Roseville 2035 General Plan.

5. Pursuant to the Streets and Highways Code, Section 8324, the abandonment and actions herein contemplated shall only be effective on the condition that: a) RJUHSD is the adjoining landowner taking lawful possession and interest in the ROW area, and b) the City’s easement interests, reserved and exempted hereby and described and depicted in Exhibits C and D, are lawfully recognized hereby and in full force and effect.

6. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute a Quitclaim Deed, in a form substantially similar to the version included with the associated agenda item for this matter incorporated herein by this reference, for the subject portion of ROW, described in Exhibits 2

A and B, to the RJUHSD or its affiliate or assignee, and any other documents required to effectuate the abandonment, vacation of the right of way and the conveyance of any other interest the City may have therein to the same, and may direct the City Attorney to prepare and may execute any additional documents, forms, or agreements as determined by the City Manager to be necessary to carry out the purpose of this Resolution; and

7. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a certified copy of this Resolution and Order, attested to by said Clerk under the seal of the City of Roseville, to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder, and to record any other documents, including a Quitclaim Deed, necessary to effectuate what is described herein.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
City Clerk
3

EXHIBIT A

RIGHT OF WAY ABANDONMENT

CAMPO STREET
AT

ROSEVILLE HIGH SCHOOL
A PORTION OF CAMPO STREET AND CORONADO AVENUE AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF “SIERRA VISTA PARK” FILED IN BOOK C OF MAPS, AT PAGE 36 IN THE OFFICE OF THE PLACER COUNTY RECORDER, BEING LOCATED IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 11 NORTH, RANGE 6 EAST, M.D.M., IN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, COUNTY OF PLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 115 AS SHOWN ON SAID PLAT OF “SIERRA VISTA PARK”, THENCE, FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING, ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF CAMPO STREET NORTH 01°03’10” EAST 350.92 FEET;
THENCE, LEAVING SAID WEST LINE OF CAMPO STREET, SOUTH 88°56’50” EAST 60.00 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF

CAMPO STREET
THENCE, ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF CAMPO STREET, SOUTH 01°03’10” WEST 383.54 FEET; THENCE, LEAVING SAID EAST LINE OF CAMPO STREET, NORTH 88°56’50” WEST 60.00 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 37°06’01” WEST 25.82 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID CORONADO AVENUE; THENCE, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF CORONADO AVENUE, NORTH 53°23’50” EAST 20.15 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

CONTAINING 23,272 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.

THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS DESCRIPTION IS “ROSEVILLE HIGH SCHOOL RECORD OF SURVEY NO. 3081” FILED IN BOOK 21 OF SURVEYS, PAGE 34 IN THE OFFICE OF THE PLACER COUNTY RECORDER.

SEE PLAT (EXHIBIT “B”) ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART THEREOF.

END OF DESCRIPTION
2-5-2026

EXHIBIT B
Civil Engineering & Land Surveying
4230 Rocklin Rd. Suite 200 Rocklin, CA 95677
Phone: 916-773-4006 Fax: 916-773-4498

EXHIBIT C

RESERVATION OF PUBLIC UTILITY & EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS EASEMENT A PORTION OF CAMPO STREET AND CORONADO AVENUE AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF “SIERRA VISTA PARK” FILED IN BOOK C OF MAPS, AT PAGE 36 IN THE OFFICE OF THE PLACER COUNTY RECORDER, BEING LOCATED IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 11 NORTH, RANGE 6 EAST, M.D.M., IN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, COUNTY OF PLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 115 AS SHOWN ON SAID PLAT OF “SIERRA VISTA PARK”, THENCE, FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING, ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF CAMPO STREET NORTH 01°03’10” EAST 350.92 FEET;
THENCE, LEAVING SAID WEST LINE OF CAMPO STREET, SOUTH 88°56’50” EAST 60.00 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF

CAMPO STREET
THENCE, ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF CAMPO STREET, SOUTH 01°03’10” WEST 383.54 FEET; THENCE, LEAVING SAID EAST LINE OF CAMPO STREET, NORTH 88°56’50” WEST 60.00 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 37°06’01” WEST 25.82 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID CORONADO AVENUE; THENCE, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF CORONADO AVENUE, NORTH 53°23’50” EAST 20.15 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

CONTAINING 23,272 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.

THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS DESCRIPTION IS “ROSEVILLE HIGH SCHOOL RECORD OF SURVEY NO. 3081” FILED IN BOOK 21 OF SURVEYS, PAGE 34 IN THE OFFICE OF THE PLACER COUNTY RECORDER.

SEE PLAT (EXHIBIT “B”) ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART THEREOF.

END OF DESCRIPTION
2-5-2026

EXHIBIT D
Civil Engineering & Land Surveying
4230 Rocklin Rd. Suite 200 Rocklin, CA 95677
Phone: 916-773-4006 Fax: 916-773-4498

Vicinity Map
Microsoft, Vantor, City of Roseville, Nearmap, City of
Roseville
City Boundary
Roseville Parcel
Roseville Street Label
2/12/2026, 4:36:42 PM
0 0.01 0.02 0.04 mi
0 0.01 0.03 0.06 km
1:1,128
Copyright: City of Roseville
Disclaimer: This map was prepared for general inquires only. The City is not liable for errors or omissions. Official information should be obtained from recorded or adopted City documents. Page 1575 of 1681

EXHIBIT A

RIGHT OF WAY ABANDONMENT

CAMPO STREET
AT

ROSEVILLE HIGH SCHOOL
A PORTION OF CAMPO STREET AND CORONADO AVENUE AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF “SIERRA VISTA PARK” FILED IN BOOK C OF MAPS, AT PAGE 36 IN THE OFFICE OF THE PLACER COUNTY RECORDER, BEING LOCATED IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 11 NORTH, RANGE 6 EAST, M.D.M., IN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, COUNTY OF PLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 115 AS SHOWN ON SAID PLAT OF “SIERRA VISTA PARK”, THENCE, FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING, ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF CAMPO STREET NORTH 01°03’10” EAST 350.92 FEET;
THENCE, LEAVING SAID WEST LINE OF CAMPO STREET, SOUTH 88°56’50” EAST 60.00 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF

CAMPO STREET
THENCE, ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF CAMPO STREET, SOUTH 01°03’10” WEST 383.54 FEET; THENCE, LEAVING SAID EAST LINE OF CAMPO STREET, NORTH 88°56’50” WEST 60.00 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 37°06’01” WEST 25.82 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID CORONADO AVENUE; THENCE, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF CORONADO AVENUE, NORTH 53°23’50” EAST 20.15 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

CONTAINING 23,272 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.

THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS DESCRIPTION IS “ROSEVILLE HIGH SCHOOL RECORD OF SURVEY NO. 3081” FILED IN BOOK 21 OF SURVEYS, PAGE 34 IN THE OFFICE OF THE PLACER COUNTY RECORDER.

SEE PLAT (EXHIBIT “B”) ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART THEREOF.

END OF DESCRIPTION
2-5-2026

ALTA VISTA AVENUE
SIERRA BLVD.

ALLEY

CORONADO AVENUE
LAS FLORES ST.

CAMPO STREET

RIGHT OF WAY ABANDONMENT

CAMPO STREET & CORONADO AVENUE

ROSEVILLE HIGH SCHOOL

CITY OF ROSEVILLE, PLACER COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
CenterPoint Engineering, Inc.

Civil Engineering & Land Surveying
4230 Rocklin Rd. Suite 200 Rocklin, CA 95677 Phone: 916-773-4006 Fax: 916-773-4498

EXHIBIT B

EXHIBIT C

RESERVATION OF PUBLIC UTILITY & EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS EASEMENT A PORTION OF CAMPO STREET AND CORONADO AVENUE AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF “SIERRA VISTA PARK” FILED IN BOOK C OF MAPS, AT PAGE 36 IN THE OFFICE OF THE PLACER COUNTY RECORDER, BEING LOCATED IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 11 NORTH, RANGE 6 EAST, M.D.M., IN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, COUNTY OF PLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 115 AS SHOWN ON SAID PLAT OF “SIERRA VISTA PARK”, THENCE, FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING, ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF CAMPO STREET NORTH 01°03’10” EAST 350.92 FEET;
THENCE, LEAVING SAID WEST LINE OF CAMPO STREET, SOUTH 88°56’50” EAST 60.00 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF

CAMPO STREET
THENCE, ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF CAMPO STREET, SOUTH 01°03’10” WEST 383.54 FEET; THENCE, LEAVING SAID EAST LINE OF CAMPO STREET, NORTH 88°56’50” WEST 60.00 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 37°06’01” WEST 25.82 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID CORONADO AVENUE; THENCE, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF CORONADO AVENUE, NORTH 53°23’50” EAST 20.15 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

CONTAINING 23,272 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.

THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS DESCRIPTION IS “ROSEVILLE HIGH SCHOOL RECORD OF SURVEY NO. 3081” FILED IN BOOK 21 OF SURVEYS, PAGE 34 IN THE OFFICE OF THE PLACER COUNTY RECORDER.

SEE PLAT (EXHIBIT “B”) ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART THEREOF.

END OF DESCRIPTION
2-5-2026

ALTA VISTA AVENUE
SIERRA BLVD.

ALLEY

CORONADO AVENUE
LAS FLORES ST.

CAMPO STREET

PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT &

EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS EASEMENT

CAMPO STREET & CORONADO AVENUE, ROSEVILLE HIGH SCHOOL

CITY OF ROSEVILLE, PLACER COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
CenterPoint Engineering, Inc.

Civil Engineering & Land Surveying
4230 Rocklin Rd. Suite 200 Rocklin, CA 95677 Phone: 916-773-4006 Fax: 916-773-4498

EXHIBIT D

Roseville Joint Union High School District BOARD OF TRUSTEES Tiffany Coleman
Pete Constant
Marla Franz
Heidi J. Hall
Bill Schuetz
Campo Street Closure
On behalf of Roseville High School and the Roseville Joint Union High School District we are requesting the permanent closure and vacation of Campo Street where it intersects our campus. While the current temporary closure during school hours provides a baseline level of security, the existing "hybrid" model creates significant safety gaps and liability risks that can only be resolved through permanent integration into our school grounds.

Our request is centered on four critical pillars of student safety and campus operations:

1. Eliminating the "False Sense of Security" and Traffic Hazards Currently, Campo Street is gated during the instructional day but is open to the public immediately before and after the school day. This creates an unsafe situation for our students.

For seven hours a day, students are conditioned to treat this area as a pedestrian-only zone.

When the gates open for before or after school activities, athletics, and events, that ingrained behavior remains. Students frequently cross the street without checking for oncoming traffic because their environment has taught them it is safe to do so. A permanent closure removes the risk of a collision caused by this predictable human error.

2. Securing the "Alleyway Gap" in Campus Ingress and Egress The current street configuration allows for alleyway access points that are not safely secured under the city’s current thoroughfare requirements.
● Controlled Entry: Permanent closure allows us to gate off alleyway access entirely, funneling all visitors through a single, secure point of entry at the front office. ● Public Deterrence: Currently, the alleyway provides an unmonitored path for unauthorized individuals to step directly onto campus. By incorporating the street into our campus, and therefore gating off this alleyway, we eliminate this "backdoor" and ensure every person on our grounds has a verified, educational purpose for being there.

3. Creation of a Supervised Student Quad
The modern high school environment requires centralized spaces where students can be effectively supervised. By reclaiming Campo Street, we will establish a unified Campus Quad similar to all of the other schools in our district. This quad allows for enhanced supervision and security, as a unified quad space on campus allows our campus monitors and administration to effectively monitor the entire student body during lunch and transition periods from a central vantage point.

4. Campus Unification and Community Culture
A school split by a public road is a school divided. Currently, facilities including our Cafeteria and Band Room are physically disconnected from the main instructional buildings via a city street. Fencing and gates are also required to secure the main campus from Campo Street during after-hours effectively splitting the campus in two. Permanent closure allows us to physically and aesthetically unify these spaces, fostering a cohesive culture that prioritizes student belonging and safety over after hours cut-through traffic convenience.

The safety of 1,450 students outweighs the convenience of a public thoroughfare during off hours. The current configuration is not merely an inconvenience; it is a safety deficit that leaves the District and the City vulnerable to preventable accidents. We are asking the City to partner with us in creating a secure, 21st-century learning environment by vacating Campo Street and allowing its full incorporation into the Roseville High School campus.

kimley-horn.com 555 Capitol Mall, Suite 300, Sacramento, California 95814 916 858 5800 Memorandum
To: Jack Varozza, P.E., QSD/P
Senior Engineer, City of Roseville
From: Stephen Dillon, P.E.

Re: Campo Street Abandonment
Traffic Evaluation
Roseville, California
Date: July 31, 2025
The purpose of this memorandum is to document the transportation analysis completed for the Campo Street Abandonment (the “proposed project” or “project”) located within the existing Roseville High School (“RHS”) campus, between Coronado Avenue and Sierra Boulevard, in Roseville, California. This memorandum evaluates the weekday AM (drop-off) and School-PM (pick-up) peak-hours under Existing (2025) conditions.

The primary conclusions from this evaluation are as follows:
 The project, which would have the effect of diverting extracurricular event (i.e. Roseville High School football game) traffic from Campo Street to the adjacent neighborhood network, is not anticipated to significantly alter the adjacent roadways’ typical existing daily operations.  The existing drop-off/pick-up pattern along Alta Vista Avenue, Sierra Boulevard, Las Flores Avenue, and Coronado Avenue presents a variety of driver behaviors, including parking in bike lanes and u-turns.
 Prevailing vehicle speeds along Sierra Boulevard currently exceed the posted 30 MPH speed limit.  As an outcome of this evaluation, we recommend that the Roseville Joint Union High School District, in coordination with the City of Roseville, develop a plan for targeted enforcement intended to address existing driver behavior within the Historic Sierra Vista community proximate to RHS, independent of the project.

Project Understanding
Kimley-Horn understands that the Roseville Joint Union High School District (“RJUHSD”, “School District”, or “District”) is proposing that the City of Roseville (the “City”) abandon the existing segment of Campo Street between Coronado Avenue and Sierra Boulevard and relinquish the facility to the School District (Exhibit 1). The project segment of Campo Street is understood1 and observed to already be closed to through traffic on weekdays during Roseville High School operating hours. The project segment is open to through traffic outside of Roseville High School operating hours. This traffic evaluation has been requested in response to the following concerns/comments provided by the proximate Historic Sierra Vista community regarding the project:
 The project will increase traffic volumes on Sierra Boulevard, Las Flores Avenue, and Alta Vista Avenue without Campo Street
 The project will contribute to increased traffic speeds on Sierra Boulevard, Las Flores Avenue, and Alta Vista Avenue without Campo Street
 The project will affect drop-off/pick-up operations at the Alta Vista Avenue and Sierra Boulevard intersection
1 Email correspondence with Jack Varozza, City of Roseville, December 4, 2024.

Campo Street Abandonment Page 2 of 8
Traffic Evaluation July 31, 2025
The primary purposes of this analysis are to evaluate the potential effects of the proposed project on traffic operations along Sierra Boulevard, Las Flores Avenue, and Alta Vista Avenue, and on drop-off/pickup operations at the Alta Vista Avenue and Sierra Boulevard intersection.

Data Collection
Kimley-Horn manually collected (via traffic count subconsultant) daily directional roadway segment traffic counts on Tuesday, March 18, 2025, to establish directional weekday roadway segment traffic volumes at the following study segments (Exhibit 1):

1. Campo Street, between Coronado Avenue and Sierra Boulevard

2. Las Flores Avenue, between Coronado Avenue and Sierra Boulevard

3. Las Flores Avenue, between Alta Vista Avenue and Sierra Boulevard

4. Sierra Boulevard, between Sequioa Street and Mariposa Street (includes speed data)

5. Sierra Boulevard, between Las Flores Avenue and Alta Vista Avenue

6. Alta Vista Avenue, between Las Flores Avenue and Sierra Boulevard (includes speed data)

7. Campo Street, north of Sierra Boulevard
The following data was collected from the City2 to aid in completing this evaluation:
 2024 Roseville High School football game ticket data (Attachment A) Kimley-Horn completed a field visit on Tuesday, March 18, 2025, to observe study facility lane configurations, vehicle storage lengths, existing traffic control, speed limits, lane utilization, pedestrian activity, and other readily apparent features relevant to the Scope of Services. The field visit included observations between 8-9 AM and 2:45-3:45 PM regarding drop-off and pick-up operations, trip distribution, vehicle dwell times, vehicle occupancy, and parking behavior that could be anticipated to translate to the proposed project condition.

Assessment of Proposed Project
Evening Event Scenario
A reasonably anticipated evening event scenario was established using 2024 Roseville High School football ticket data (including home and visitor fan splits) provided by the City2 . The ticket data was
supplemented with vehicle occupancy data from FHWA3 to approximate the number of vehicles a typical game night might generate based on the number of home and visitor fans attending the event. Additional assumptions were made regarding the percentages of home and visitor fans who could be expected to overlap in attending both the Junior Varsity (JV) and Varsity football games which are understood to occur on the same evening. The anticipated number of vehicles produced by a typical football event and relevant assumptions are summarized in Table 1.

Trip Distribution
Directional roadway segment counts were used to establish a general distribution of trips accessing the high school parking lot located north of Sierra Boulevard. Directional roadway segment counts between 8:00-8:30 AM were supplemented by observed vehicle turning movements at the intersection of Las Flores Avenue and Sierra Boulevard between 8:10-8:30 AM on Tuesday, March 18, 2025. This data establishes a directional pattern of high school-bound trips during the peak-period for students arriving on campus. The distribution of trips was developed based on AM observations as it is assumed that all trips accessing the high school during this period will be traveling from “home.” 2 Email correspondence with Jack Varozza, City of Roseville, January 16, 2025. 3 Chapter 5: Event Operations Planning, Managing Travel for Planned Special Events, FHWA, February 1, 2017.

Campo Street Abandonment Page 3 of 8
Traffic Evaluation July 31, 2025
Table 1 – Football Event Vehicle Generation
Directional roadway segment counts were also used to establish a distribution of trips leaving the high school from the high school parking lot located north of Sierra Boulevard. Directional roadway segment counts between 2:45-3:30 PM were used to consider a directional egress pattern from the high school during the peak-period for students leaving campus. While the PM distribution is a useful reference point, it presents more variance than the AM distribution as not all trips leaving the high school during the PM peak can be assumed to travel “home.” As such, it is expected that the AM peak-period home-based trip behavior would be generally consistent with inbound and outbound travel patterns for events occurring outside of Roseville High School operating hours.

As the traffic counts were gathered and observed while the Campo Street project segment was temporarily closed to vehicle traffic during the high school day, it is reasonably assumed that the same distribution will generally apply should Campo Street be permanently closed. Thus, it is reasonable to assume that home fan football game attendees would follow a trip distribution comparable to the one identified for the Weekday AM peak period. It is also assumed that visitor fans may be more widely distributed across the local network depending on their origins. The project trip distribution for home and visitor fans is provided in Exhibit 2.

Study Facilities and Analysis Methodology
A roadway segment operations analysis (volume thresholds) was conducted for a weekday for the following scenarios:

A. Existing (2025) Conditions
B. Existing (2025) plus Project Conditions
The roadway segment analysis was completed for the following roadway segments:

1. Campo Street, between Coronado Avenue and Sierra Boulevard

2. Las Flores Avenue, between Coronado Avenue and Sierra Boulevard

3. Las Flores Avenue, between Alta Vista Avenue and Sierra Boulevard

4. Sierra Boulevard, between Sequioa Street and Mariposa Street

5. Sierra Boulevard, between Las Flores Avenue and Alta Vista Avenue

6. Alta Vista Avenue, between Las Flores Avenue and Sierra Boulevard Level of Service (LOS) Definitions
The LOS of a facility is a qualitative measure used to describe operational conditions. LOS ranges from A, which represents minimal delay, to F, which represents heavy delay and a facility that is operating at or near its functional capacity.

Maximum 2024
Attendance* Home %* Home Fans Home Vehicle
Occupancy**
Possible
Home
Home JV
(35%)
JV:Varsity Overlap
(40%)
Home Varsity
(65%)
Total
Home
65% 1,007 2.8 360 126 -50 234 310
Visitor %* Visitor
Fans
Visitor Vehicle
Occupancy**
Possible
Visitor
Visitor JV
(20%)
JV:Varsity Overlap
(80%)
Visitor Varsity
(80%)
Total
Visitor
35% 543 2.2 247 49 -39 198 208
*Attendance data provided by City of Roseville and RJUHSD **Event Vehicle Occupancy data provided by FHWA
1,550
Estimated Event Vehicles

Campo Street Abandonment Page 4 of 8
Traffic Evaluation July 31, 2025
Roadway segment Levels of Service for this study were determined using daily traffic volumes. In the absence of comparable references from the City or Placer County, roadway segment volume thresholds from Sacramento County4 were used to provide a planning level assessment of the project study facilities.

The study facility roadways are classified as “Residential collector with frontage.” Table 2 presents roadway segment LOS thresholds as classified by facility type.

Table 2 – Roadway Segment Level of Service Criteria
Daily operations were determined for the scenarios listed above. Exhibit 3 shows weekday volumes under Existing (2025) and Existing (2025) plus Project conditions. Study facility traffic count data sheets are provided in Attachment B.

Analysis Results
Existing Drop-off/Pick-up Operations
The analysis documented existing neighborhood circulation on Tuesday, March 18, 2025, surrounding drop-off and pick-up activities within the Historic Sierra Vista community during a typical weekday with Roseville High School classes in session. The existing circulation conditions were observed as follows:

Drop-off
 The peak period was observed to be from approximately 8:10 to 8:25 AM. The neighborhood was significantly less busy after 8:35 AM.
 Seven (7) drop-offs were observed within the immediate vicinity of the Alta Vista Avenue and Sierra Boulevard intersection.
 Four (4) vehicles made u-turns on Sierra Boulevard in advance of Alta Vista Avenue after dropping off students.
 Most vehicles passing through the Sierra Boulevard and Alta Vista Avenue intersection appeared to be students destined for the parking area behind Roseville High School.  26 drop-offs were observed on the segment of Las Flores Avenue between Sierra Boulevard and Coronado Avenue.
 Five (5) vehicles made u-turns on Las Flores Avenue between Sierra Boulevard and Coronado Avenue.
4 Transportation Analysis Guidelines, County of Sacramento, September 10, 2020.

LOS A LOS B LOS C LOS D LOS E
Residential collector with
frontage
2 1,600 3,200 4,800 6,400 8,000
Residential collector
without frontage
2 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 10,000
Source: Transportation Analysis Guidelines , County of Sacramento, September 10, 2020.

Residential 2
Facility Type # of
Lanes
Maximum Volume for Given Service Level
600 1,200 2,000 3,000 4,500

Campo Street Abandonment Page 5 of 8
Traffic Evaluation July 31, 2025
Pick-up
 The peak period was observed to be from approximately 3:15 to 3:35 PM.  Vehicles started queueing along the Alta Vista Avenue curbs at 2:50 PM.  Vehicles started queueing along the Las Flores Avenue curbs at 3:15 PM.  Traffic within the neighborhood is predominantly inflow to the parking area behind Roseville High School until 3:20 PM.
 Six (6) vehicles were observed queueing within the bike lane along the south side of Sierra Boulevard between Las Flores Avenue and Alta Vista Avenue from 3:06 and 3:23 PM.  The local pattern was observed to shift to predominantly egressing students/vehicles around 3:25 PM.
 The north and south sides of Sierra Boulevard between Las Flores Avenue and Alta Vista Avenue are popular pick-up locations.
 15 U-turns were observed on Sierra Boulevard between Las Flores Avenue and Alta Vista Avenue.  Las Flores Avenue between Sierra Boulevard and Coronado Avenue is a popular pick-up location.

Roadway Segment Operations
The analysis evaluated the potential effects of rerouted event traffic from the project on local roadway operations within the Historic Sierra Vista community. “Plus Project” roadway segment performance was evaluated by layering rerouted event trips established in Table 1 on top of typical weekday traffic volumes according to the established trip distribution. Table 3 summarizes the neighborhood roadway segment Level of Service under Existing (2025) and Existing (2025) plus Project conditions Table 3 – Neighborhood Roadway Segment LOS
As indicated in Table 3, the study roadway segments operate at LOS A and LOS B in the Existing (2025) and Existing (2025) plus Project scenarios. All roadway segments exhibit sufficient capacity to accommodate the additional vehicles that would be reasonably anticipated during an evening afterschool event without access to Campo Street between Sierra Boulevard and Las Flores Avenue.

Daily
Volume LOS Daily Volume LOS
1 Campo Street, between Coronado
Avenue and Sierra Boulevard
Residential
collector with
frontage
2 1,934 B 2,141 B
2 Las Flores Avenue, between Coronado
Avenue and Sierra Boulevard
Residential
collector with
frontage
2 1,215 A 1,422 A
3 Las Flores Avenue, between Alta Vista
Avenue and Sierra Boulevard
Residential
collector with
frontage
2 473 A 473 A
4 Sierra Boulevard, between Sequioa
Street and Mariposa Street
Residential
collector with
frontage
2 1,632 B 2,098 B
5 Sierra Boulevard, between Las Flores
Avenue and Alta Vista Avenue
Residential
collector with
frontage
2 1,083 A 1,756 B
6 Alta Vista Avenue, between Las Flores
Avenue and Sierra Boulevard
Residential
collector with
frontage
2 624 A 987 A
ID Location Facility Type # of
Lanes
Existing (2025) Existing (2025)
plus Project

Campo Street Abandonment Page 6 of 8
Traffic Evaluation July 31, 2025
Roadway Segment Speeds
The traffic data collected on Tuesday, March 18, 2025, captured directional vehicle speed data for the following roadway segments:
 Sierra Boulevard, between Sequioa Street and Mariposa Street  Alta Vista Avenue, between Las Flores Avenue and Sierra Boulevard The observed posted speed limit along Sierra Boulevard was 30 MPH. Table 4 presents the Average, Prevailing (85th-percentile), and 95th-percentile documented speeds for each roadway segment. Rerouted event traffic related to the project would not be anticipated to significantly alter the existing condition.

Table 4 – Roadway Segment Speeds
Traffic Management Plan (TMP) Strategies
Should the project proceed, RJUHSD may consider implementing traffic management strategies in coordination with the City to lessen the effects of “large” extracurricular events on the local Historic Sierra Vista community, beyond the level to which the community is already affected on a daily basis during normal school activities. Traffic control measures for the pre-event and post-event time periods are intended to facilitate the following:
 Limiting the number of vehicles that circulate looking for parking  Limiting vehicle congestion before and after events by directing traffic appropriately to/from RHS via Alta Vista Avenue, Sierra Boulevard, and Las Flores Avenue  Enhanced public safety for attendees of events held at RHS and residents of Historic Sierra Vista RJUHSD may consider placing Traffic Control Officers (TCOs) at key intersections proximate to RHS to manage “event surge”, attendees and public responses to modified/event-specific traffic patterns. TCOs may consist of RJUHSD staff and/or private contractors. RJUHSD should collaboratively assess and adjust the TCOs’ roles, responsibilities, and staffing needs in coordination with the City based on observations from the first-year of strategy implementation.

Special event loading zones may be considered for pre-event drop off and post-event pick up activity for a variety of vehicular travel modes outside of private automobiles. These activities are anticipated to primarily consist of transportation network companies (TNCs) and the general public. It is recommended that these loading zones be located along Berry Street to lessen impacts within Historic Sierra Vista.

RHS has approximately 180 marked parking spaces in the primary on-site event parking area between the football and baseball fields. The number of venue attendees that can be served within the main parking area will fluctuate depending on factors such as average vehicle occupancy, the duration of an event, and the arrival profile for an event. RJUHSD should collaborate with the City to establish appropriate thresholds for closing and reopening the main on-site parking area that preserve utility to the venue while reducing the propensity of inefficient circulation within and in the vicinity of this primary parking facility.

To limit the effects of events on the surrounding neighborhood, to the extent possible attendees from the east should be directed to access RHS via Yosemite Street and Sierra Boulevard. 4 Sierra Boulevard, between Sequioa
Street and Mariposa Street
30 30 38 42
6 Alta Vista Avenue, between Las Flores
Avenue and Sierra Boulevard - 16 25 29
ID Location Average Speed
(MPH)
85th % Speed
(MPH)
95th % Speed
(MPH)
Posted Speed
(MPH)

Campo Street Abandonment Page 7 of 8
Traffic Evaluation July 31, 2025
RJUHSD may consider facilitating additional parking for “large” events. These events should be identified in advance during regularly scheduled meetings between RJUHSD and the City. The primary locations for additional parking may be the Tiger Way RHS parking lot, the Tiger Way Independence High School parking lot, and the RHS Berry Lot.

RHS is neighbored by the Historic Sierra Vista community to the immediate west. As RHS hosts “large” events, a dynamic may develop where in attendees familiar with the surrounding area may park in the residential development adjacent to the main parking area and enter the venue on foot. The City should monitor complaints/feedback from these adjacent residents regarding off-site parking adversely affecting living conditions and violating existing parking restrictions currently in place along Alta Vista Avenue, Sierra Boulevard, and Las Flores Avenue.

All stakeholders involved (RJUHSD and the City) should meet in advance of upcoming scheduled events at RHS to ensure that appropriate TMP measures are being considered in advance of all event sizes. This regular coordination will enable all stakeholders to properly allocate available resources and provide sufficient notice to both affected members of the general public and potential attendees.

Conclusions
The following are the primary conclusions based on the analyses discussed herein:
 The existing Trip Distribution reflects dominant usage of Sierra Boulevard – Traffic data and field observations from Tuesday, March 18, 2025, indicate that Sierra Boulevard is the primary route for vehicles accessing the RHS parking lot via Campo Street. This finding is consistent with expectations based on the existing RHS student attendance boundaries.  The prevailing drop-off/pick-up conditions proximate to RHS vary – Vehicles arriving along Alta Vista Avenue, Sierra Boulevard, and Las Flores Avenue exhibit a wide variety of driver behaviors.

There are observed instances of parking in bike lanes and u-turns along these roadways during the AM drop-off and PM pick-up periods.
 The neighborhood roadway segments are not expected to operate beyond capacity assuming permanent closure of Campo Street – The assumed addition of project event trips on the roadway segments proximate to Campo Street is not anticipated to result in the neighborhood roads operating beyond their functional capacity.
 The prevailing roadway segment speeds collected are higher than posted – The prevailing Daily, AM Peak, and PM Peak speeds measured on Sierra Boulevard are higher than posted speed limits.
 RJUHSD may consider implementing TMP strategies during larger events – RJUHSD should consider drawing from the TMP strategies provided in this memorandum to facilitate orderly access to and from the site during large events. RJUHSD should collaborate with the City to ensure that desirable strategies intended to handle “event surge” and minimize the effects of closing Campo Street are implemented as appropriate.

Campo Street Abandonment Page 8 of 8
Traffic Evaluation July 31, 2025
Attachments
Exhibit 1 – Project Vicinity Map
Exhibit 2 – Project Trip Distribution
Exhibit 3 – Existing (2025) and Existing (2025) plus Project Daily Segment Traffic Volumes Attachment A – 2024 Roseville High School Football Game Ticket Data Attachment B – Traffic Count Data Sheets

Atlantic St
Las Flores Ave
Berry St
Tiger Wy
Campo St
Coronado Ave
Tahoe Ave
Sierra Blvd
Mariposa St
Sequoia St
Alta Vista Ave
Yosemite St
Roseville
High School
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 Project Location
Study Roadway
Segment
#
LEGEND

NOT TO SCALE
Exhibit 1
Project Vicinity Map
Roseville Campo Street Abandonment

Atlantic St
Las Flores Ave
Berry St
Tiger Wy
Campo St
Coronado Ave
Tahoe Ave
Sierra Blvd
Mariposa St
Sequoia St
Alta Vista Ave
Yosemite St
Roseville
High School
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 Project Location
Study Roadway
Segment
#
LEGEND
XX% Home Distribution
XX% Visitor Distribution
35%
45%
20%
10%
50%
40%

NOT TO SCALE
Exhibit 2
Project Trip Distribution
Roseville Campo Street Abandonment

LEGEND
##
Existing/Existing+Project
Daily Traffic Volumes
XX/YY
Project Location
Study Roadway
Segment
#
1 Campo St
Coronado Ave
Tahoe Ave Tiger Wy
Sequoia St
Mariposa St
Sierra Blvd
4 1934/2141
1632/2098
Alta Vista Ave
Sierra Blvd
5Las Flores Ave
2 Las Flores Ave
Coronado Ave
Sierra Blvd
3 Las Flores Ave
Sierra Blvd
Alta Vista Ave
Sierra Blvd
Alta Vista Ave
6Las Flores Ave
7 Campo St
Sierra Blvd
1215/1422
473/473
1083/1756 624/987
1350/2386
Campo St
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 Sierra Blvd
Alta Vista Ave
Las Flores Ave
Coronado Ave
Mariposa St
Sequioa St
Exhibit 3
Existing (2025) and Existing (2025) plus Project Daily Segment Traffic Volumes Roseville Campo Street Abandonment

NOT TO SCALE

Campo Street Abandonment
Traffic Evaluation
Attachment A
2024 Roseville High School Football Game Ticket Data

2 Thanks,
Scott Davis
Director, Facilities Development
Roseville Joint Union High School District
(916) 782-4707 x1213 / [email protected]
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Wilson, Jason <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 1:04 PM
Subject: Football Attendance
To: Scott Davis <[email protected]>
Cc: Ashley Serin <[email protected]>
Good afternoon Scott,
Here are the numbers of tickets sold for each football event:

Date Total Tickets Type H/V % Home Visitor
8/29/24 236 Freshman 65/35 153 83
8/30/2024 1271 JV/Varsity 65/35 826 445
9/19/2024 239 Freshman 65/35 155 84
9/20/2024 1235 JV/Varsity 65/35 802 433
10/10/2024 189 Freshman 70/30 132 57
10/11/2024 1130 JV/Varsity 70/30 791 339
10/24/2024 197 Freshman 60/40 118 79
10/25/2024 1290 JV/Varsity 60/40 774 516
11/1/2024 1542 Fr/JV/Varsity 60/40 925 617
These are estimates as we do not have exact home and visitor numbers. I also believe these are more on the high side. I would argue that most of our gates are more like a 70/30 split with our rivals being more like 65/35 or 60/40, like in the case of hosting Woodcreek
JW
--
Jason Wilson
Assistant Principal
Athletics Administrator
Roseville High School
(916) 782-3753
"I lead to foster meaningful life experiences and develop lasting relationships with our students and staff through respect, integrity, and resiliency."

Campo Street Abandonment
Traffic Evaluation
Attachment B
Traffic Count Data Sheets

Day: Tuesday City: Roseville
Date: Project #: CA25_070070_001
NB SB EB WB Total
1,168 766 0 0 1,934

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 0 0 0 12:00 11 3 14 00:00 01:00 1 1 2
0:15 0 0 0 12:15 14 7 21 01:00 02:00 3 0 3
0:30 0 0 0 12:30 16 7 23 02:00 03:00 0 1 1
0:45 1 1 2 12:45 12 4 16 03:00 04:00 1 1 2
1:00 2 0 2 13:00 12 10 22 04:00 05:00 0 1 1
1:15 1 0 1 13:15 19 11 30 05:00 06:00 3 13 16
1:30 0 0 0 13:30 19 12 31 06:00 07:00 14 18 32
1:45 0 0 0 13:45 21 8 29 07:00 08:00 44 51 95
2:00 0 0 0 14:00 16 20 36 08:00 09:00 97 82 179
2:15 0 0 0 14:15 21 9 30 09:00 10:00 23 30 53
2:30 0 0 0 14:30 28 8 36 10:00 11:00 29 23 52
2:45 0 1 1 14:45 26 9 35 11:00 12:00 33 26 59
3:00 0 0 0 15:00 31 4 35 12:00 13:00 53 21 74
3:15 0 0 0 15:15 47 35 82 13:00 14:00 71 41 112
3:30 1 1 2 15:30 57 23 80 14:00 15:00 91 46 137
3:45 0 0 0 15:45 35 15 50 15:00 16:00 170 77 247
4:00 0 0 0 16:00 56 10 66 16:00 17:00 155 37 192
4:15 0 0 0 16:15 33 6 39 17:00 18:00 139 92 231
4:30 0 0 0 16:30 29 9 38 18:00 19:00 84 101 185
4:45 0 1 1 16:45 37 12 49 19:00 20:00 52 29 81
5:00 0 0 0 17:00 32 10 42 20:00 21:00 43 32 75
5:15 2 4 6 17:15 37 22 59 21:00 22:00 41 30 71
5:30 0 4 4 17:30 33 20 53 22:00 23:00 15 8 23
5:45 1 5 6 17:45 37 40 77 23:00 00:00 6 5 11
6:00 2 1 3 18:00 28 52 80
6:15 4 7 11 18:15 19 17 36 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 1 4 5 18:30 15 23 38 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 7 6 13 18:45 22 9 31 248 247 495
7:00 12 10 22 19:00 10 9 19 7:45 7:45 7:45
7:15 15 10 25 19:15 13 6 19 100 94 194
7:30 7 12 19 19:30 15 9 24 0.610 0.734 0.664
7:45 10 19 29 19:45 14 5 19
8:00 41 32 73 20:00 15 3 18 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 36 26 62 20:15 11 6 17 920 519 1439
8:30 13 17 30 20:30 11 22 33 15:15 17:15 15:15
8:45 7 7 14 20:45 6 1 7 195 134 278
9:00 4 10 14 21:00 19 7 26 0.855 0.644 0.848
9:15 4 6 10 21:15 13 12 25
9:30 9 7 16 21:30 3 6 9 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 6 7 13 21:45 6 5 11 141 133 274
10:00 9 6 15 22:00 6 3 9 7:45 7:45 7:45
10:15 6 5 11 22:15 6 1 7 100 94 194
10:30 6 5 11 22:30 2 1 3 0.610 0.734 0.664
10:45 8 7 15 22:45 1 3 4
11:00 7 8 15 23:00 6 4 10 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 6 7 13 23:15 0 1 1 294 129 423
11:30 12 7 19 23:30 0 0 0 16:00 17:00 17:00
11:45 8 4 12 23:45 0 0 0 155 92 231
TOTALS 248 247 0 0 495 TOTALS 920 519 0 0 1439 0.692 0.575 0.750 SPLIT % 50% 50% 0% 0% 26% SPLIT % 64% 36% 0% 0% 74%
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Campo St S/O Coronado Ave
3/18/2025

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15-Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140
160
180 00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00

NB SB EB WB

Day: Tuesday City: Roseville
Date: Project #: CA25_070070_002
NB SB EB WB Total
694 521 0 0 1,215

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 0 0 0 12:00 8 3 11 00:00 01:00 0 0 0
0:15 0 0 0 12:15 12 5 17 01:00 02:00 0 0 0
0:30 0 0 0 12:30 14 6 20 02:00 03:00 0 0 0
0:45 0 0 0 12:45 11 5 16 03:00 04:00 1 1 2
1:00 0 0 0 13:00 7 10 17 04:00 05:00 0 0 0
1:15 0 0 0 13:15 19 9 28 05:00 06:00 1 7 8
1:30 0 0 0 13:30 20 12 32 06:00 07:00 9 12 21
1:45 0 0 0 13:45 16 9 25 07:00 08:00 41 53 94
2:00 0 0 0 14:00 11 21 32 08:00 09:00 85 107 192
2:15 0 0 0 14:15 20 7 27 09:00 10:00 18 24 42
2:30 0 0 0 14:30 27 8 35 10:00 11:00 20 19 39
2:45 0 0 0 14:45 20 5 25 11:00 12:00 29 21 50
3:00 0 0 0 15:00 17 10 27 12:00 13:00 45 19 64
3:15 0 0 0 15:15 35 32 67 13:00 14:00 62 40 102
3:30 1 1 2 15:30 45 22 67 14:00 15:00 78 41 119
3:45 0 0 0 15:45 31 14 45 15:00 16:00 128 78 206
4:00 0 0 0 16:00 48 7 55 16:00 17:00 71 25 96
4:15 0 0 0 16:15 11 7 18 17:00 18:00 37 25 62
4:30 0 0 0 16:30 6 7 13 18:00 19:00 26 20 46
4:45 0 0 0 16:45 6 4 10 19:00 20:00 10 9 19
5:00 0 0 0 17:00 7 2 9 20:00 21:00 20 7 27
5:15 1 2 3 17:15 7 8 15 21:00 22:00 9 10 19
5:30 0 2 2 17:30 10 6 16 22:00 23:00 2 1 3
5:45 0 3 3 17:45 13 9 22 23:00 00:00 2 2 4
6:00 1 2 3 18:00 13 9 22
6:15 3 3 6 18:15 3 5 8 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 0 4 4 18:30 6 3 9 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 5 3 8 18:45 4 3 7 204 244 448
7:00 11 9 20 19:00 3 2 5 7:45 7:45 7:45
7:15 12 10 22 19:15 2 2 4 91 126 217
7:30 7 13 20 19:30 4 3 7 0.599 0.670 0.662
7:45 11 21 32 19:45 1 2 3
8:00 31 47 78 20:00 3 2 5 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 38 44 82 20:15 9 4 13 490 277 767
8:30 11 14 25 20:30 5 1 6 15:15 15:00 15:15
8:45 5 2 7 20:45 3 0 3 159 78 234
9:00 2 10 12 21:00 6 4 10 0.828 0.609 0.873
9:15 5 5 10 21:15 2 4 6
9:30 4 4 8 21:30 0 1 1 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 7 5 12 21:45 1 1 2 126 160 286
10:00 5 7 12 22:00 2 0 2 7:45 7:45 7:45
10:15 6 3 9 22:15 0 0 0 91 126 217
10:30 4 5 9 22:30 0 1 1 0.599 0.670 0.662
10:45 5 4 9 22:45 0 0 0
11:00 3 6 9 23:00 1 2 3 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 8 6 14 23:15 0 0 0 108 50 158
11:30 10 5 15 23:30 0 0 0 16:00 16:00 16:00
11:45 8 4 12 23:45 1 0 1 71 25 96
TOTALS 204 244 0 0 448 TOTALS 490 277 0 0 767 0.370 0.893 0.436 SPLIT % 46% 54% 0% 0% 37% SPLIT % 64% 36% 0% 0% 63%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Las Flores Ave Bet Coronado Ave & Sierra Blvd
3/18/2025

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15-Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140 00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00

NB SB EB WB

Day: Tuesday City: Roseville
Date: Project #: CA25_070070_003
NB SB EB WB Total
240 233 0 0 473

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 0 0 0 12:00 4 1 5 00:00 01:00 0 0 0
0:15 0 0 0 12:15 8 1 9 01:00 02:00 0 0 0
0:30 0 0 0 12:30 8 3 11 02:00 03:00 0 0 0
0:45 0 0 0 12:45 7 2 9 03:00 04:00 0 0 0
1:00 0 0 0 13:00 5 3 8 04:00 05:00 0 1 1
1:15 0 0 0 13:15 10 3 13 05:00 06:00 0 6 6
1:30 0 0 0 13:30 7 6 13 06:00 07:00 7 10 17
1:45 0 0 0 13:45 11 4 15 07:00 08:00 11 22 33
2:00 0 0 0 14:00 6 7 13 08:00 09:00 24 55 79
2:15 0 0 0 14:15 6 2 8 09:00 10:00 4 14 18
2:30 0 0 0 14:30 10 4 14 10:00 11:00 9 6 15
2:45 0 0 0 14:45 10 2 12 11:00 12:00 11 15 26
3:00 0 0 0 15:00 5 3 8 12:00 13:00 27 7 34
3:15 0 0 0 15:15 7 17 24 13:00 14:00 33 16 49
3:30 0 0 0 15:30 19 10 29 14:00 15:00 32 15 47
3:45 0 0 0 15:45 7 3 10 15:00 16:00 38 33 71
4:00 0 0 0 16:00 10 1 11 16:00 17:00 13 5 18
4:15 0 1 1 16:15 0 2 2 17:00 18:00 8 12 20
4:30 0 0 0 16:30 2 1 3 18:00 19:00 9 11 20
4:45 0 0 0 16:45 1 1 2 19:00 20:00 0 3 3
5:00 0 0 0 17:00 0 1 1 20:00 21:00 9 0 9
5:15 0 2 2 17:15 1 5 6 21:00 22:00 3 2 5
5:30 0 1 1 17:30 5 2 7 22:00 23:00 0 0 0
5:45 0 3 3 17:45 2 4 6 23:00 00:00 2 0 2
6:00 1 2 3 18:00 7 3 10
6:15 3 3 6 18:15 0 3 3 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 1 2 3 18:30 0 2 2 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 2 3 5 18:45 2 3 5 66 129 195
7:00 1 3 4 19:00 0 1 1 7:30 7:45 7:30
7:15 1 3 4 19:15 0 0 0 27 64 90
7:30 5 7 12 19:30 0 1 1 0.614 0.571 0.577
7:45 4 9 13 19:45 0 1 1
8:00 7 19 26 20:00 2 0 2 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 11 28 39 20:15 2 0 2 174 104 278
8:30 2 8 10 20:30 4 0 4 15:15 15:00 15:15
8:45 4 0 4 20:45 1 0 1 43 33 74
9:00 0 6 6 21:00 2 0 2 0.566 0.485 0.638
9:15 0 2 2 21:15 1 2 3
9:30 2 3 5 21:30 0 0 0 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 2 3 5 21:45 0 0 0 35 77 112
10:00 3 2 5 22:00 0 0 0 7:30 7:45 7:30
10:15 2 1 3 22:15 0 0 0 27 64 90
10:30 2 2 4 22:30 0 0 0 0.614 0.571 0.577
10:45 2 1 3 22:45 0 0 0
11:00 1 5 6 23:00 1 0 1 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 4 4 8 23:15 0 0 0 21 17 38
11:30 4 5 9 23:30 0 0 0 16:00 17:00 17:00
11:45 2 1 3 23:45 1 0 1 13 12 20
TOTALS 66 129 0 0 195 TOTALS 174 104 0 0 278 0.325 0.600 0.714 SPLIT % 34% 66% 0% 0% 41% SPLIT % 63% 37% 0% 0% 59%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Las Flores Ave Bet Sierra Blvd & Alta Vista Ave
3/18/2025

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15-Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00

NB SB EB WB

Day: Tuesday City: Roseville
Date: Project #: CA25_070070_004
NB SB EB WB Total
0 0 773 859 1,632

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 1 0 1 12:00 8 5 13 00:00 01:00 2 1 3
0:15 1 0 1 12:15 3 5 8 01:00 02:00 0 1 1
0:30 0 0 0 12:30 3 12 15 02:00 03:00 0 0 0
0:45 0 1 1 12:45 2 5 7 03:00 04:00 3 1 4
1:00 0 0 0 13:00 6 6 12 04:00 05:00 0 3 3
1:15 0 0 0 13:15 9 14 23 05:00 06:00 4 3 7
1:30 0 0 0 13:30 5 10 15 06:00 07:00 6 7 13
1:45 0 1 1 13:45 11 14 25 07:00 08:00 76 44 120
2:00 0 0 0 14:00 10 21 31 08:00 09:00 193 103 296
2:15 0 0 0 14:15 11 9 20 09:00 10:00 26 19 45
2:30 0 0 0 14:30 7 10 17 10:00 11:00 19 22 41
2:45 0 0 0 14:45 20 12 32 11:00 12:00 19 30 49
3:00 0 0 0 15:00 28 10 38 12:00 13:00 16 27 43
3:15 0 0 0 15:15 35 70 105 13:00 14:00 31 44 75
3:30 2 1 3 15:30 22 43 65 14:00 15:00 48 52 100
3:45 1 0 1 15:45 20 15 35 15:00 16:00 105 138 243
4:00 0 1 1 16:00 20 21 41 16:00 17:00 59 71 130
4:15 0 1 1 16:15 11 22 33 17:00 18:00 54 92 146
4:30 0 0 0 16:30 15 15 30 18:00 19:00 47 88 135
4:45 0 1 1 16:45 13 13 26 19:00 20:00 26 37 63
5:00 0 0 0 17:00 9 14 23 20:00 21:00 24 44 68
5:15 1 2 3 17:15 20 31 51 21:00 22:00 8 26 34
5:30 1 1 2 17:30 14 18 32 22:00 23:00 5 6 11
5:45 2 0 2 17:45 11 29 40 23:00 00:00 2 0 2
6:00 0 1 1 18:00 11 31 42
6:15 0 0 0 18:15 10 14 24 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 4 3 7 18:30 13 26 39 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 2 3 5 18:45 13 17 30 348 234 582
7:00 18 7 25 19:00 7 14 21 7:45 7:45 7:45
7:15 9 15 24 19:15 10 7 17 226 112 338
7:30 15 9 24 19:30 4 8 12 0.665 0.528 0.612
7:45 34 13 47 19:45 5 8 13
8:00 83 30 113 20:00 7 7 14 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 85 53 138 20:15 7 14 21 425 625 1050
8:30 24 16 40 20:30 3 14 17 14:45 15:15 15:15
8:45 1 4 5 20:45 7 9 16 105 149 246
9:00 9 2 11 21:00 3 10 13 0.750 0.532 0.586
9:15 4 8 12 21:15 2 10 12
9:30 6 2 8 21:30 1 2 3 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 7 7 14 21:45 2 4 6 269 147 416
10:00 7 3 10 22:00 0 3 3 7:45 7:45 7:45
10:15 3 6 9 22:15 2 2 4 226 112 338
10:30 3 6 9 22:30 1 0 1 0.665 0.528 0.612
10:45 6 7 13 22:45 2 1 3
11:00 6 4 10 23:00 1 0 1 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 4 5 9 23:15 0 0 0 113 163 276
11:30 4 16 20 23:30 0 0 0 16:00 17:00 17:00
11:45 5 5 10 23:45 1 0 1 59 92 146
TOTALS 0 0 348 234 582 TOTALS 0 0 425 625 1050 0.738 0.742 0.716 SPLIT % 0% 0% 60% 40% 36% SPLIT % 0% 0% 40% 60% 64%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Sierra Blvd Bet Sequioa St & Mariposa St
3/18/2025

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15-Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 50
100
150
200
250 00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00

NB SB EB WB

Day: Tuesday City: Roseville
Date: Project #: CA25_070070_004
5 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 5 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 5 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 99 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 99 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 99 0:00 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5:00 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 6:00 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 4 1 2 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 7:00 0 11 2 5 22 22 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 76 0 9 5 8 15 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 0 20 7 13 37 28 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 120 8:00 1 10 7 23 81 52 15 4 0 0 0 0 0 193 1 20 13 21 31 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 103 2 30 20 44 112 68 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 296 9:00 1 6 5 2 2 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 2 3 3 5 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 3 9 8 7 5 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 10:00 2 3 0 4 4 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 19 3 4 5 3 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 5 7 5 7 10 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 41 11:00 2 5 2 1 3 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 2 8 3 5 5 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 4 13 5 6 8 7 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 12:00 0 0 1 4 5 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 1 7 2 6 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 1 7 3 10 11 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 13:00 3 6 3 2 3 10 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 31 1 3 6 13 12 3 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 44 4 9 9 15 15 13 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 75 14:00 2 13 7 3 9 9 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 48 2 16 5 9 14 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 4 29 12 12 23 13 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 100 15:00 2 13 4 5 31 34 12 4 0 0 0 0 0 105 3 19 13 48 35 16 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 138 5 32 17 53 66 50 15 5 0 0 0 0 0 243 16:00 3 9 5 4 10 16 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 59 0 10 5 11 26 16 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 3 19 10 15 36 32 11 4 0 0 0 0 0 130 17:00 0 7 3 3 15 18 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 54 1 5 8 13 39 22 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 92 1 12 11 16 54 40 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 146 18:00 0 5 2 0 13 17 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 47 1 9 6 14 32 21 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 88 1 14 8 14 45 38 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 135 19:00 1 1 2 4 3 9 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 26 4 1 1 9 14 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 5 2 3 13 17 15 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 63 20:00 0 3 3 5 7 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 2 4 3 16 13 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 2 7 6 21 20 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 21:00 1 1 0 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 2 2 10 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 1 3 2 12 10 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 22:00 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 2 2 2 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 23:00 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Totals 23 99 48 70 211 215 86 21 0 0 0 0 0 773 28 126 84 194 263 133 27 4 0 0 0 0 0 859 51 225 132 264 474 348 113 25 0 0 0 0 0 1,632 % of Totals 3% 13% 6% 9% 27% 28% 11% 3% 100% 3% 15% 10% 23% 31% 15% 3% 0% 100% 3% 14% 8% 16% 29% 21% 7% 2% 100% 00:00 - 12:00 10 37 17 37 114 89 38 6 0 0 0 0 0 348 12 50 32 44 61 31 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 234 22 87 49 81 175 120 42 6 0 0 0 0 0 582 % 1% 5% 2% 5% 15% 12% 5% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 45% 2% 6% 4% 6% 8% 4% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 30% 3% 11% 6% 10% 23% 16% 5% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 75% Peak Hour 10:15 7:45 7:30 7:30 7:30 7:45 7:45 7:45 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 7:45 9:30 7:30 7:30 7:45 7:45 7:45 10:45 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 7:45 9:30 7:30 7:30 7:45 7:45 7:45 7:45 7:45 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 7:45 Peak Volume 3 16 9 24 89 64 20 4 0 0 0 0 0 226 4 24 13 23 35 17 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 112 6 39 22 47 124 81 21 4 0 0 0 0 0 338 12:00 - 24:00 13 62 31 33 97 126 48 15 0 0 0 0 0 425 16 76 52 150 202 102 23 4 0 0 0 0 0 625 29 138 83 183 299 228 71 19 0 0 0 0 0 1050 % 2% 8% 4% 4% 13% 16% 6% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 55% 2% 10% 7% 19% 26% 13% 3% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 81% 4% 18% 11% 24% 39% 29% 9% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 136% Peak Hour 14:45 14:30 14:00 19:15 15:00 15:00 15:00 15:15 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 14:45 18:45 14:45 14:45 14:45 15:15 17:45 13:00 17:45 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 15:15 14:45 14:45 14:45 14:45 15:15 15:00 15:00 15:15 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 15:15 Peak Volume 4 19 7 6 31 34 12 6 0 0 0 0 0 105 4 24 14 50 44 26 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 149 7 40 20 55 71 50 15 7 0 0 0 0 0 246 07:00 - 09:00 1 21 9 28 103 74 28 5 0 0 0 0 0 269 1 29 18 29 46 22 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 147 2 50 27 57 149 96 30 5 0 0 0 0 0 416 % 0% 3% 1% 4% 13% 10% 4% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 35% 0% 4% 2% 4% 6% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 19% 0% 6% 3% 7% 19% 12% 4% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 54% Peak Hour 7:45 7:45 7:30 7:30 7:30 7:45 7:45 7:45 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:45 7:30 7:30 7:30 7:45 7:45 7:45 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:45 7:45 7:30 7:30 7:45 7:45 7:45 7:45 7:45 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:45 Peak Volume 1 16 9 24 89 64 20 4 0 0 0 0 0 226 1 24 13 23 35 17 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 112 2 39 22 47 124 81 21 4 0 0 0 0 0 338 16:00 - 18:00 3 16 8 7 25 34 15 5 0 0 0 0 0 113 1 15 13 24 65 38 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 163 4 31 21 31 90 72 21 6 0 0 0 0 0 276 % 0% 2% 1% 1% 3% 4% 2% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 15% 0% 2% 2% 3% 8% 5% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 21% 1% 4% 3% 4% 12% 9% 3% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 36% Peak Hour 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 17:00 16:45 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:45 16:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 16:30 17:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 17:00 16:00 16:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 16:30 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 17:00 Peak Volume 3 9 5 4 15 19 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 59 1 10 8 13 39 22 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 92 3 19 11 16 54 40 12 4 0 0 0 0 0 146 EASTBOUND 20 33 32 40 44 773
859
TOTALS 19 32 30 38 42 1632
WESTBOUND 19 30 29 36 40 HOURLY BREAKDOWN STATISTICS
Direction Percentiles
15th 50th Average 85th 95th ADT
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
SPEED
Sierra Blvd Bet Sequioa St & Mariposa St
3/18/2025
Time

EASTBOUND
Total

WESTBOUND
Total
TOTALS
Total

Day: Tuesday City: Roseville
Date: Project #: CA25_070070_005
NB SB EB WB Total
0 0 607 476 1,083

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 0 0 0 12:00 5 3 8 00:00 01:00 1 1 2
0:15 1 0 1 12:15 4 6 10 01:00 02:00 0 0 0
0:30 0 0 0 12:30 2 3 5 02:00 03:00 0 0 0
0:45 0 1 1 12:45 1 1 2 03:00 04:00 0 0 0
1:00 0 0 0 13:00 2 4 6 04:00 05:00 0 0 0
1:15 0 0 0 13:15 4 4 8 05:00 06:00 1 0 1
1:30 0 0 0 13:30 5 5 10 06:00 07:00 5 1 6
1:45 0 0 0 13:45 6 14 20 07:00 08:00 75 39 114
2:00 0 0 0 14:00 1 12 13 08:00 09:00 154 39 193
2:15 0 0 0 14:15 8 1 9 09:00 10:00 11 4 15
2:30 0 0 0 14:30 12 4 16 10:00 11:00 10 10 20
2:45 0 0 0 14:45 15 2 17 11:00 12:00 10 5 15
3:00 0 0 0 15:00 25 3 28 12:00 13:00 12 13 25
3:15 0 0 0 15:15 30 48 78 13:00 14:00 17 27 44
3:30 0 0 0 15:30 34 33 67 14:00 15:00 36 19 55
3:45 0 0 0 15:45 31 12 43 15:00 16:00 120 96 216
4:00 0 0 0 16:00 37 10 47 16:00 17:00 53 28 81
4:15 0 0 0 16:15 4 9 13 17:00 18:00 36 60 96
4:30 0 0 0 16:30 5 5 10 18:00 19:00 31 60 91
4:45 0 0 0 16:45 7 4 11 19:00 20:00 18 21 39
5:00 0 0 0 17:00 8 7 15 20:00 21:00 11 27 38
5:15 1 0 1 17:15 9 17 26 21:00 22:00 6 22 28
5:30 0 0 0 17:30 11 12 23 22:00 23:00 0 2 2
5:45 0 0 0 17:45 8 24 32 23:00 00:00 0 2 2
6:00 0 1 1 18:00 5 21 26
6:15 0 0 0 18:15 6 8 14 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 1 0 1 18:30 9 21 30 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 4 0 4 18:45 11 10 21 267 99 366
7:00 26 9 35 19:00 8 9 17 7:45 7:45 7:45
7:15 19 18 37 19:15 6 4 10 179 48 227
7:30 5 2 7 19:30 1 2 3 0.589 0.571 0.585
7:45 25 10 35 19:45 3 6 9
8:00 67 14 81 20:00 3 5 8 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 76 21 97 20:15 2 6 8 340 377 717
8:30 11 3 14 20:30 1 12 13 15:15 15:15 15:15
8:45 0 1 1 20:45 5 4 9 132 103 235
9:00 5 2 7 21:00 4 11 15 0.892 0.536 0.753
9:15 2 1 3 21:15 1 8 9
9:30 2 0 2 21:30 1 1 2 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 2 1 3 21:45 0 2 2 229 78 307
10:00 2 3 5 22:00 0 1 1 7:45 7:45 7:45
10:15 4 3 7 22:15 0 1 1 179 48 227
10:30 2 2 4 22:30 0 0 0 0.589 0.571 0.585
10:45 2 2 4 22:45 0 0 0
11:00 1 1 2 23:00 0 2 2 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 4 2 6 23:15 0 0 0 89 88 177
11:30 2 0 2 23:30 0 0 0 16:00 17:00 17:00
11:45 3 2 5 23:45 0 0 0 53 60 96
TOTALS 0 0 267 99 366 TOTALS 0 0 340 377 717 0.358 0.625 0.750 SPLIT % 0% 0% 73% 27% 34% SPLIT % 0% 0% 47% 53% 66%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Sierra Blvd Bet Las Flores Ave & Alta Vista Ave
3/18/2025

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15-Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140
160
180 00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00

NB SB EB WB

Day: Tuesday City: Roseville
Date: Project #: CA25_070070_006
NB SB EB WB Total
0 0 306 318 624

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 0 0 0 12:00 1 0 1 00:00 01:00 0 1 1
0:15 0 0 0 12:15 0 1 1 01:00 02:00 0 0 0
0:30 0 1 1 12:30 1 2 3 02:00 03:00 0 0 0
0:45 0 0 0 12:45 0 0 0 03:00 04:00 0 0 0
1:00 0 0 0 13:00 0 1 1 04:00 05:00 0 0 0
1:15 0 0 0 13:15 1 1 2 05:00 06:00 1 1 2
1:30 0 0 0 13:30 4 0 4 06:00 07:00 2 2 4
1:45 0 0 0 13:45 3 10 13 07:00 08:00 22 8 30
2:00 0 0 0 14:00 0 3 3 08:00 09:00 129 14 143
2:15 0 0 0 14:15 0 0 0 09:00 10:00 0 2 2
2:30 0 0 0 14:30 7 2 9 10:00 11:00 2 1 3
2:45 0 0 0 14:45 2 2 4 11:00 12:00 2 3 5
3:00 0 0 0 15:00 3 3 6 12:00 13:00 2 3 5
3:15 0 0 0 15:15 18 37 55 13:00 14:00 8 12 20
3:30 0 0 0 15:30 6 13 19 14:00 15:00 9 7 16
3:45 0 0 0 15:45 7 3 10 15:00 16:00 34 56 90
4:00 0 0 0 16:00 9 3 12 16:00 17:00 50 36 86
4:15 0 0 0 16:15 5 6 11 17:00 18:00 23 48 71
4:30 0 0 0 16:30 23 15 38 18:00 19:00 11 48 59
4:45 0 0 0 16:45 13 12 25 19:00 20:00 4 32 36
5:00 0 0 0 17:00 11 11 22 20:00 21:00 3 17 20
5:15 1 0 1 17:15 3 16 19 21:00 22:00 2 21 23
5:30 0 0 0 17:30 6 8 14 22:00 23:00 2 6 8
5:45 0 1 1 17:45 3 13 16 23:00 00:00 0 0 0
6:00 0 0 0 18:00 6 15 21
6:15 1 1 2 18:15 0 8 8 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 0 0 0 18:30 0 10 10 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 1 1 2 18:45 5 15 20 158 32 190
7:00 6 2 8 19:00 2 13 15 7:45 7:30 7:45
7:15 6 4 10 19:15 0 6 6 138 16 154
7:30 1 0 1 19:30 1 8 9 0.500 0.571 0.507
7:45 9 2 11 19:45 1 5 6
8:00 58 7 65 20:00 1 4 5 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 69 7 76 20:15 1 3 4 148 286 434
8:30 2 0 2 20:30 1 8 9 16:15 15:00 16:30
8:45 0 0 0 20:45 0 2 2 52 56 104
9:00 0 2 2 21:00 1 12 13 0.565 0.378 0.684
9:15 0 0 0 21:15 0 6 6
9:30 0 0 0 21:30 1 1 2 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 0 0 0 21:45 0 2 2 151 22 173
10:00 0 0 0 22:00 1 2 3 7:45 7:30 7:45
10:15 1 0 1 22:15 0 2 2 138 16 154
10:30 0 1 1 22:30 0 2 2 0.500 0.571 0.507
10:45 1 0 1 22:45 1 0 1
11:00 0 1 1 23:00 0 0 0 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 0 2 2 23:15 0 0 0 73 84 157
11:30 0 0 0 23:30 0 0 0 16:15 16:30 16:30
11:45 2 0 2 23:45 0 0 0 52 54 104
TOTALS 0 0 158 32 190 TOTALS 0 0 148 286 434 0.565 0.844 0.684 SPLIT % 0% 0% 83% 17% 30% SPLIT % 0% 0% 34% 66% 70%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Alta Vista Ave Bet Las Flores Ave & Sierra Blvd
3/18/2025

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15-Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140 00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00

NB SB EB WB

Day: Tuesday City: Roseville
Date: Project #: CA25_070070_006
5 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 5 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 5 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 99 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 99 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 99 0:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6:00 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 7:00 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 2 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 24 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 8:00 118 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 129 6 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 124 17 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 143 9:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 10:00 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 11:00 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 12:00 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 13:00 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 2 4 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 8 2 4 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 14:00 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 2 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 10 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 15:00 31 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 10 20 15 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 41 23 15 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 16:00 46 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 8 18 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 46 12 18 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 86 17:00 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 4 25 17 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 23 4 25 17 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 18:00 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 3 12 22 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 14 12 22 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 19:00 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 3 16 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 6 3 16 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 20:00 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 8 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 3 2 8 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 21:00 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 3 9 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 3 3 9 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 22:00 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 2 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals 287 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 306 28 67 131 73 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 318 315 86 131 73 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 624 % of Totals 94% 6% 100% 9% 21% 41% 23% 6% 100% 50% 14% 21% 12% 3% 100% 00:00 - 12:00 147 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 158 9 11 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 156 22 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 190 % 48% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 52% 3% 4% 3% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 10% 51% 7% 3% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 62% Peak Hour 7:45 7:30 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 7:45 7:30 7:30 6:30 7:15 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 7:30 7:45 7:30 6:30 7:15 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 7:45 Peak Volume 127 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 138 8 6 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 135 17 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 154 12:00 - 24:00 140 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 148 19 56 122 70 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 286 159 64 122 70 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 434 % 46% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 48% 6% 18% 40% 23% 6% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 93% 52% 21% 40% 23% 6% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 142% Peak Hour 16:15 15:45 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 16:15 14:30 15:00 17:15 17:15 19:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 15:00 16:15 15:00 17:15 17:15 19:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 16:30 Peak Volume 48 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 11 20 27 18 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 48 23 27 18 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 104 07:00 - 09:00 140 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 151 8 7 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 148 18 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 173 % 46% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 49% 3% 2% 2% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 7% 48% 6% 2% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 57% Peak Hour 7:45 7:30 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:45 7:30 7:30 7:00 7:15 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:30 7:45 7:30 7:00 7:15 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:45 Peak Volume 127 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 138 8 6 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 135 17 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 154 16:00 - 18:00 69 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 0 12 43 26 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 84 69 16 43 26 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 157 % 23% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 24% 0% 4% 14% 8% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 27% 23% 5% 14% 8% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 51% Peak Hour 16:15 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:15 16:00 16:00 16:30 16:30 16:15 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:30 16:15 16:00 16:30 16:30 16:15 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:30 Peak Volume 48 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 0 8 26 17 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 48 12 26 17 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 104 EASTBOUND 7 10 10 14 16 306
318
TOTALS 8 15 16 25 29 624
WESTBOUND 16 22 22 28 31 HOURLY BREAKDOWN STATISTICS
Direction Percentiles
15th 50th Average 85th 95th ADT
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
SPEED
Alta Vista Ave Bet Las Flores Ave & Sierra Blvd
3/18/2025
Time

EASTBOUND
Total

WESTBOUND
Total
TOTALS
Total

Day: Tuesday City: Roseville
Date: Project #: CA25_070070_007
NB SB EB WB Total
782 568 0 0 1,350

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 0 0 0 12:00 0 0 0 00:00 01:00 1 2 3
0:15 0 0 0 12:15 2 0 2 01:00 02:00 1 0 1
0:30 1 1 2 12:30 2 1 3 02:00 03:00 0 0 0
0:45 0 1 1 12:45 1 1 2 03:00 04:00 0 0 0
1:00 1 0 1 13:00 0 0 0 04:00 05:00 0 0 0
1:15 0 0 0 13:15 1 0 1 05:00 06:00 0 1 1
1:30 0 0 0 13:30 6 3 9 06:00 07:00 5 0 5
1:45 0 0 0 13:45 3 21 24 07:00 08:00 79 33 112
2:00 0 0 0 14:00 0 11 11 08:00 09:00 244 11 255
2:15 0 0 0 14:15 10 3 13 09:00 10:00 4 0 4
2:30 0 0 0 14:30 13 2 15 10:00 11:00 6 3 9
2:45 0 0 0 14:45 11 2 13 11:00 12:00 4 2 6
3:00 0 0 0 15:00 13 2 15 12:00 13:00 5 2 7
3:15 0 0 0 15:15 29 58 87 13:00 14:00 10 24 34
3:30 0 0 0 15:30 30 30 60 14:00 15:00 34 18 52
3:45 0 0 0 15:45 31 9 40 15:00 16:00 103 99 202
4:00 0 0 0 16:00 42 8 50 16:00 17:00 124 31 155
4:15 0 0 0 16:15 18 7 25 17:00 18:00 64 102 166
4:30 0 0 0 16:30 33 7 40 18:00 19:00 66 135 201
4:45 0 0 0 16:45 31 9 40 19:00 20:00 22 35 57
5:00 0 0 0 17:00 22 13 35 20:00 21:00 4 49 53
5:15 0 0 0 17:15 21 20 41 21:00 22:00 5 20 25
5:30 0 0 0 17:30 15 21 36 22:00 23:00 0 0 0
5:45 0 1 1 17:45 6 48 54 23:00 00:00 1 1 2
6:00 0 0 0 18:00 18 54 72
6:15 0 0 0 18:15 16 16 32 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 1 0 1 18:30 7 41 48 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 4 0 4 18:45 25 24 49 344 52 396
7:00 27 10 37 19:00 11 22 33 7:45 7:00 7:45
7:15 26 19 45 19:15 6 4 10 265 33 278
7:30 5 2 7 19:30 2 4 6 0.506 0.434 0.511
7:45 21 2 23 19:45 3 5 8
8:00 100 2 102 20:00 0 3 3 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 131 5 136 20:15 0 5 5 438 516 954
8:30 13 4 17 20:30 1 35 36 15:15 17:45 15:15
8:45 0 0 0 20:45 3 6 9 132 159 237
9:00 1 0 1 21:00 4 19 23 0.786 0.736 0.681
9:15 1 0 1 21:15 1 1 2
9:30 1 0 1 21:30 0 0 0 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 1 0 1 21:45 0 0 0 323 44 367
10:00 0 1 1 22:00 0 0 0 7:45 7:00 7:45
10:15 4 0 4 22:15 0 0 0 265 33 278
10:30 1 1 2 22:30 0 0 0 0.506 0.434 0.511
10:45 1 1 2 22:45 0 0 0
11:00 1 1 2 23:00 1 1 2 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 0 1 1 23:15 0 0 0 188 133 321
11:30 0 0 0 23:30 0 0 0 16:00 17:00 17:00
11:45 3 0 3 23:45 0 0 0 124 102 166
TOTALS 344 52 0 0 396 TOTALS 438 516 0 0 954 0.738 0.531 0.769 SPLIT % 87% 13% 0% 0% 29% SPLIT % 46% 54% 0% 0% 71%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Campo St N/O Sierra Blvd/Alta Vista Ave
3/18/2025

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15-Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 50
100
150
200
250
300 00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00

NB SB EB WB

RECORDING REQUESTED BY:

APN No.: _____________________

WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO AND MAIL
TAX STATEMENTS TO:

SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDERS USE
Quitclaim Deed
Exempt from fee per GC27383 and/or GC27388.1 (a)(2); document is executed or recorded by the state or any county, municipality, or other political subdivision of the state.

The undersigned grantor(s) declare(s):

Documentary transfer tax is $0.00; City transfer tax is $0.00. This conveyance is exempt from documentary transfer tax since a government agency is vacating interest and granting the same to a party in the best interests of the public/ City, and based on the limited value of otherwise unusable former right of way, R&T 11911. ( ) computed on full value of property conveyed, or·
( ) computed on full value less value of liens and encumbrances remaining at time of sale. ( ) Unincorporated area: (X) City of Roseville
( ) Realty not sold.

FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, The City of Roseville, a municipal corporation hereby REMISE(S), RELEASE{S) AND FOREVER QUITCLAIM(S) to ___________________________________________, a __________________________________________, (Grantee) that property in City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California, described as:

See "Exhibit A" attached hereto and made a part hereof, and as depicted in "Exhibit B" attached hereto and made part hereof; however reserving therefrom and exempt from this conveyance are the easement interests reserved and provided to the City of Roseville as described and depicted in "Exhibit C" and "Exhibit D" attached hereto and made part hereof.

This Quitclaim Deed is being recorded for the purpose of vacating right of way and granting the City's interest, if any, to the Grantee, as described and shown in Exhibits A and B--but reserving and exempting therefrom the public utility easement and emergency vehicle access easement and purposes appurtenant thereto, on, over, under and across the real property described and depicted in Exhibits C and D--concerning a portion of the City's Campo Street right of way, West of 1 Tiger Way, which was dedicated to the City as public right of way on or about October 15, 1906, recorded at the Placer County Recorder's Office and filed for record in Book 11 of Maps, Page 18.

Mall Tax Statements to Grantee at address above
The City of Roseville, a municipal corporation
Date
Dominick Casey
City Manager

MAIL TAX STATEMENTS AS DIRECTED ABOVE

A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the Identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of __________ _
County of __________ _
On __________ before me, __________________ a Notary Public, personally appeared _______________________________ _,
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/tbey executed the same in his/her/their authorized capaclty(les), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENAL TY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature: ___________ _
Name: _____________ _
(Typed or Printed) (Seal)

EXHIBIT A

RIGHT OF WAY ABANDONMENT

CAMPO STREET
AT

ROSEVILLE HIGH SCHOOL
A PORTION OF CAMPO STREET AND CORONADO AVENUE AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF “SIERRA VISTA PARK” FILED IN BOOK C OF MAPS, AT PAGE 36 IN THE OFFICE OF THE PLACER COUNTY RECORDER, BEING LOCATED IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 11 NORTH, RANGE 6 EAST, M.D.M., IN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, COUNTY OF PLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 115 AS SHOWN ON SAID PLAT OF “SIERRA VISTA PARK”, THENCE, FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING, ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF CAMPO STREET NORTH 01°03’10” EAST 350.92 FEET;
THENCE, LEAVING SAID WEST LINE OF CAMPO STREET, SOUTH 88°56’50” EAST 60.00 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF

CAMPO STREET
THENCE, ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF CAMPO STREET, SOUTH 01°03’10” WEST 383.54 FEET; THENCE, LEAVING SAID EAST LINE OF CAMPO STREET, NORTH 88°56’50” WEST 60.00 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 37°06’01” WEST 25.82 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID CORONADO AVENUE; THENCE, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF CORONADO AVENUE, NORTH 53°23’50” EAST 20.15 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

CONTAINING 23,272 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.

THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS DESCRIPTION IS “ROSEVILLE HIGH SCHOOL RECORD OF SURVEY NO. 3081” FILED IN BOOK 21 OF SURVEYS, PAGE 34 IN THE OFFICE OF THE PLACER COUNTY RECORDER.

SEE PLAT (EXHIBIT “B”) ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART THEREOF.

END OF DESCRIPTION
2-5-2026

ALTA VISTA AVENUE
SIERRA BLVD.

ALLEY

CORONADO AVENUE
LAS FLORES ST.

CAMPO STREET

RIGHT OF WAY ABANDONMENT

CAMPO STREET & CORONADO AVENUE

ROSEVILLE HIGH SCHOOL

CITY OF ROSEVILLE, PLACER COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
CenterPoint Engineering, Inc.

Civil Engineering & Land Surveying
4230 Rocklin Rd. Suite 200 Rocklin, CA 95677 Phone: 916-773-4006 Fax: 916-773-4498

EXHIBIT B

EXHIBIT C

RESERVATION OF PUBLIC UTILITY & EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS EASEMENT A PORTION OF CAMPO STREET AND CORONADO AVENUE AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF “SIERRA VISTA PARK” FILED IN BOOK C OF MAPS, AT PAGE 36 IN THE OFFICE OF THE PLACER COUNTY RECORDER, BEING LOCATED IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 11 NORTH, RANGE 6 EAST, M.D.M., IN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, COUNTY OF PLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 115 AS SHOWN ON SAID PLAT OF “SIERRA VISTA PARK”, THENCE, FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING, ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF CAMPO STREET NORTH 01°03’10” EAST 350.92 FEET;
THENCE, LEAVING SAID WEST LINE OF CAMPO STREET, SOUTH 88°56’50” EAST 60.00 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF

CAMPO STREET
THENCE, ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF CAMPO STREET, SOUTH 01°03’10” WEST 383.54 FEET; THENCE, LEAVING SAID EAST LINE OF CAMPO STREET, NORTH 88°56’50” WEST 60.00 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 37°06’01” WEST 25.82 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID CORONADO AVENUE; THENCE, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF CORONADO AVENUE, NORTH 53°23’50” EAST 20.15 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

CONTAINING 23,272 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.

THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS DESCRIPTION IS “ROSEVILLE HIGH SCHOOL RECORD OF SURVEY NO. 3081” FILED IN BOOK 21 OF SURVEYS, PAGE 34 IN THE OFFICE OF THE PLACER COUNTY RECORDER.

SEE PLAT (EXHIBIT “B”) ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART THEREOF.

END OF DESCRIPTION
2-5-2026

ALTA VISTA AVENUE
SIERRA BLVD.

ALLEY

CORONADO AVENUE
LAS FLORES ST.

CAMPO STREET

PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT &

EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS EASEMENT

CAMPO STREET & CORONADO AVENUE, ROSEVILLE HIGH SCHOOL

CITY OF ROSEVILLE, PLACER COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
CenterPoint Engineering, Inc.

Civil Engineering & Land Surveying
4230 Rocklin Rd. Suite 200 Rocklin, CA 95677 Phone: 916-773-4006 Fax: 916-773-4498

EXHIBIT D

City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 5/6/2026
Item #: VIII.39
File #: 0709-03
Item ID: 2026-331
Title: Community Development Block Grant – 2026 Annual Action Plan Contact: Danielle OConnell 916-774-5277 [email protected]

SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of the City's 2026 Annual Action Plan for the federal Community Development Block Grant Program and authorization for the City Manager to execute necessary documents and certifications on behalf of the City. This item does not result in any impact to the City's General Fund.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions:
a. Hold a Public Hearing and receive public comment on the City of Roseville 2026 Annual Action Plan; and
b. Adopt a resolution approving the 2026 Annual Action Plan and authorizing the City Manager to execute necessary documents and certifications on behalf of the City of Roseville for submittal to the U.S.

Department of Housing & Urban Development.

BACKGROUND
The City became a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) entitlement jurisdiction in 1986, and has traditionally funded housing activities, public facilities and improvements, removal of architectural barriers, planning, program administration, and public service activities. As an entitlement jurisdiction, the City of Roseville receives an annual allocation of CDBG funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to promote affordable housing and community development programs for low-income residents.

Each year the City must produce an Annual Action Plan explaining how CDBG funds will be used to address the goals of the five-year Consolidated Plan. HUD has announced that the City of Roseville will receive $707,327 in CDBG funding for FY2026-2027. It is anticipated that the City will receive at least $50,000 in CDBG program income, available for the same period. In addition, the City has an estimated $732,715.34 in prior-year carryover funds available for reprogramming.

A public meeting was held on January 8, 2026, at the beginning of the CDBG application process, in order to identify community needs and discuss proposed projects for use of CDBG funding. The meeting was held in person and also accessible remotely. The purpose of the meeting was to identify community needs and discuss potential programs and projects for the use of CDBG funds. Representatives from six agencies were in attendance to discuss local needs and potential programs and projects of the CDBG program.
2026 Annual Action Plan

The Annual Action Plan provides an overview of the City’s use of CDBG funds to address community needs in the second year of the five-year Consolidated Plan. Federal regulations require that at least 70% of CDBG funds be used for projects that primarily benefit persons under the low-income limit, defined as persons from households at or below 80% of Area Median Income (AMI), adjusted by family size. For example, the current low-income limit for a family of four in Placer County is $102,900. However, most of the activities proposed for funding address families at or below the very low-income limit (50% AMI), which is $64,300 for a family of four.

Public Service and Capital Improvements Project Applications In response to a notice of funding availability published in the Press Tribune, the City received ten applications requesting a total of $227,500 in assistance. All ten applications were for public service programs. Public Service awards are limited to no less than $10,000 and no more than $25,000. Of the ten public service applications received, eight were for ongoing programs under the City’s current and past funding year cycles. Staff enlisted the assistance of CDBG staff from surrounding jurisdictions, along with individuals possessing experience and expertise the CDBG program and the needs of low-income populations, to assist in the review and ranking of applications. The funding recommendations are based on numeric ratings, with applications scored out of a possible 100 points.

In accordance with the scoring scale listed above and based on competitive and limited public service funding of 15% of the CDBG grant allocation, only the top five ranked applications are recommended to receive funding. Staff analyzed the estimated amount of CDBG funding and determined that the higher ranked applications would receive a higher percentage of their funding request. The top two rated applications are recommended to receive 100% of their request. The remaining applications are recommended for funding on a sliding scale as follows: the third and fourth ranked applications are recommended to receive 90% of their request, and the fifth ranked is recommended to receive 85% of their request. More detail regarding the funding recommendations can be found below and in Attachment 2.

Public Works
Public Works has identified a significant need for new and upgraded sidewalk curb ramps in lower income neighborhoods to improve accessibility for residents with mobility impairments. These improvements are essential to bring existing sidewalks into compliance with current Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards. The project will focus on the Sierra Gardens neighborhood, removing architectural barriers and ensuring ADA compliance. These upgrades will improve safe, accessible routes along key neighborhood corridors, including Douglas Boulevard, and enhance connections to public destinations such as Maidu Regional Park on Rocky Ridge Drive.

Fair Housing
Providing fair housing counseling and education to both tenants and landlords remains a priority within the City’s five-year planning cycle. In October 2024, Council approved a contract with Project Sentinel, a fair housing services provider, to provide these services for the City for up to five years. Pending City Council approval, and the adoption of the Annual Action Plan by HUD, staff will request City Manager approval to execute a second amendment to the contract, in the amount of $16,000, to extend services for the second of four optional renewal years. This extension will enable Project Sentinel to continue delivering fair housing education, support, and resources to Roseville residents, ensuring ongoing compliance with federal and state fair housing laws.

Housing projects
Funds totaling $235,000 are proposed to be allocated to the City’s Owner-Occupied Housing Rehabilitation Program. The program currently has approximately $600,000 in State of California HOME funds available. However, certain activities are not eligible for HOME funds but are allowable under CDBG, such as emergency repairs and grant assistance.

The following is a summary of proposed funding in the 2026 Annual Action Plan:

Project Prior year carryover
Funds & Estimated PI
2026 CDBG Allocation Total
Administration and
Planning
$141,465.00 $141,465.00
Roseville Fair Housing
Services
$16,000.00 $16,000.00
AMI Housing Homeless
Housing Assistance
$21,250.00 $21,250.00
Seniors First Meals on
Wheels
$15,000.00 $15,000.00
St. Vincent de Paul
Society BAGS Food
Home Delivery Program
$17,500.00 $17,500.00
St. Vincent de Paul
Society Food Locker
Staffing Support
$22,500.00 $22,500.00
Stand Up Placer
Emergency Response and
Crisis Support Initiative
$22,500.00 $22,500.00
Roseville OwnerOccupied Housing
Rehabilitation Program
$50,000.00 $180,000.00 $230,000.00
Public Works ADA
Improvements
$732,715.34 $271,112.00 $1,003,827.34
Total $1,490,042.34
The draft Annual Action Plan (Attachment 1) was made available for public review and comment for a period exceeding the required 30-days, beginning April 3, 2026. The public review period for the draft Annual Action Plan ends May 6, 2026 with Council's action. The City plans to submit the Annual Action Plan to HUD no later than May 15, 2026.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Community Development Block Grant program is funded with federal dollars. The program has reduced costs to the community over the last 40 years. The adoption of the 2026 CDBG Annual Action Plan will not have any fiscal impact to the General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct

or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The 2026 Annual Action Plan meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CDBG funds are subject to the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) as implemented by HUD at 24 CFR 58. NEPA reviews will be completed for each program and project funded prior to any expenditures for these activities.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS

1. Ensure a safe and healthy community
Respectfully Submitted,
Danielle OConnell, Housing Analyst
Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Director
ATTACHMENTS:

1. 131100 POP PUBLIC NOTICE PT 4-3

2. 131101 POP PUBLIC NOTICE PT 4-3

3. Resolution 26-117

4. Attachment 1 - 2026 Draft Annual Action Plan

5. Attachment 2 - 2026 CDBG Funding Recommendations

6. Certifications and Assurances 2026
REVIEWERS:

Danielle OConnell, Economic Development Department - Housing Created/Initiated - 4/15/2026 Trisha Isom, Economic Development Department - Housing Approved - 4/16/2026 Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Department Approved - 4/20/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 4/20/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 4/20/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 4/21/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 4/21/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 4/22/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 4/22/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 4/22/2026

131100

PUBLIC NOTICE
The above space is reserved for Court/County Filed Date Stamp

PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2015.5 C.C.P.)

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of Placer
I am a citizen of the United States and employed by a publication in the County aforesaid. I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to the mentioned matter. I am the principal clerk of the Roseville Press Tribune, a newspaper of general circulation, in the City of Roseville, which is printed and published in the County of Placer. This newspaper has been judged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of Placer, on the date of May 5, 1952, (Case Number 17357). The notice, of which the attached is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil) has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit:
4/3/2026
I certify, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct.

LILY PHILAVANH
Dated in Roseville, California
4/3/2026

PROOF OF PUBLICATION

THE ROSEVILLE PRESS TRIBUNE
1030 High Street
Auburn, CA 95603
P.O. Box 5910
Auburn, CA 95604

131101

PUBLIC NOTICE
The above space is reserved for Court/County Filed Date Stamp

PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2015.5 C.C.P.)

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of Placer
I am a citizen of the United States and employed by a publication in the County aforesaid. I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to the mentioned matter. I am the principal clerk of the Roseville Press Tribune, a newspaper of general circulation, in the City of Roseville, which is printed and published in the County of Placer. This newspaper has been judged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of Placer, on the date of May 5, 1952, (Case Number 17357). The notice, of which the attached is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil) has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit:
4/3/2026
I certify, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct.

LILY PHILAVANH
Dated in Roseville, California
4/3/2026

PROOF OF PUBLICATION

THE ROSEVILLE PRESS TRIBUNE
1030 High Street
Auburn, CA 95603
P.O. Box 5910
Auburn, CA 95604

RESOLUTION NO. 26-117
APPROVING THE 2026 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONS ON

BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, the City of Roseville anticipates an allocation of $700,000 in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds for the 2026 Program Year; and WHEREAS, the Council conducted a public meeting on January 8, 2026, to receive public comments regarding the 2026 Annual Action Plan; and WHEREAS, the Council has reviewed and hereby agrees to comply with all Certifications executed in connection with said Annual Plans; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that the 2026 Annual Action Plan is hereby approved; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute on behalf of the City of Roseville, the standard Operating Agreements, and all other necessary documents and certifications required by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for participation in the CDBG program.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this __________ day of __________________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________

CITY CLERK

Annual Action Plan
2026
1 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
2026 Annual Action Plan
(July 1, 2026 – June 30, 2027)

Annual Action Plan
2026
2 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Executive Summary
AP-05 Executive Summary - 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b)

1. Introduction
The 2026-2027 Annual Action Plan constitutes the second year of the 2025-2029 Five-year Consolidated Planning period.

The City of Roseville (City) will receive $707,327 in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for Program Year (PY) 2026 (July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027). CDBG funds are designated for the promotion of affordable housing and community development programs for lower-income residents. The 2026 Annual Action Plan provides an overview of the City’s use of CDBG funds to address community needs established in the 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan.

Federal regulations require that at least 70% of CDBG funds must be used for projects that primarily benefit persons under the Low- and Moderate-Income limit defined as persons from households at or below 80% of Area Median Income (AMI) for Placer County. Low-and ModerateIncome persons and households are referred to as Low-Income throughout this document. The remainder of CDBG funds may be used to address slum and blight, or to address an urgent and unexpected community need such as floods or earthquakes.

Under CDBG regulations, projects serving an area with 51% or more low-income residents may be eligible for CDBG funding on an Area Benefit basis using census data. An exception is allowed for communities with few or no qualifying areas.

The City of Roseville is designated by HUD as an Exception Grantee under the CDBG program. As a result, activities qualifying under the Low- and Moderate-Income (LMI) Area Benefit national objective must serve an area in which at least 46.81% of residents are low- and moderate-income, rather than the standard 51% threshold. The City uses the most recent HUD Low- and ModerateIncome Summary Data to determine eligibility for Area Benefit activities and will apply any updated Exception Grantee thresholds released by HUD during the PY 2026 planning cycle.

The City of Roseville's Housing Division is the lead agency responsible for the development of the Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan. The Housing Division is also the primary agency responsible for the administration and management of programs and projects covered by the Consolidated Plan and identified in the Annual Action Plan (Plan).

The City plans to incur costs for 2026 CDBG activities prior to the award of funds. These costs will be limited to those that the City has found to be necessary for the efficient and timely performance of the CDBG program and the funded activity. Costs will not be incurred prior to the completion of the public comment period, and not prior to the approval of the Annual Action Plan by the City Council. Pre-award costs will not exceed one-half of the estimated award. Pre-award costs will be

Annual Action Plan
2026
3 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
funded from the 2026 award only. Subsequent award years will not be impacted.

The City will utilize CDBG funds as well as other Federal, State and local resources, including its Housing Choice Voucher Rental Assistance Contract, State Administered HOME funds, and local developer contributions to address housing and community development priority needs identified in the Consolidated Plan.

The Annual Action Plan identifies a variety of activities, including public services, public facility improvements and housing activities the City proposes to undertake during PY 2026 to meet underserved needs identified in the Consolidated Plan. In addition, the Action Plan discusses the actions the City will take to address: lead-based paint hazards; barriers to affordable housing; housing needs of households at or below the poverty level; and Fair Housing resource needs. All proposed activities address the CDBG primary national objective of addressing the needs of Lowand Moderate-Income persons.

2. Summarize the objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan This could be a restatement of items or a table listed elsewhere in the plan or a reference to another location. It may also contain any essential items from the housing and homeless needs assessment, the housing market analysis or the strategic plan.

The City will allocate investment of resources on a city-wide basis for affordable housing programs such as the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher and Owner-Occupied Housing Rehabilitation Program. In addition, rental and purchase units provided under the City's 10% Affordable Housing Goal will be offered on a City-wide basis.

Activities identified under the public service category and targeted to special needs populations will be offered on a city-wide basis and/or where resources can be coordinated with existing facilities or services.

In addition, the City will support the development and rehabilitation of public infrastructure serving low- and moderate-income areas, including installation and improvement of curb ramps to enhance accessibility, mobility, and ADA compliance.

The City will continue to apply for funding and/or support applications by service providers to expand affordable housing opportunities as well as homeless assistance and supportive services consistent with the Consolidated Plan.

Affordable Housing —The Roseville Housing Authority will apply for additional Housing Choice Vouchers, if made available, to increase the number of extremely low and very low-income households receiving rental assistance. The City will continue to implement the City's 10% Affordable Housing Goal to increase the number of rental and purchase units affordable to very low, low, and moderate income households; support private development of affordable housing using Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTCs), Tax Exempt Bond financing, and city and state Local Housing Trust Funds (LHTF); utilize HOME (state) Program Income funds in order to continue to expand the City's Housing Rehabilitation Programs for low-income households. Under this plan,

Annual Action Plan
2026
4 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
the City will allocate CDBG funding towards development of housing affordable to Low-Income Households.

Homeless — The City will continue its efforts to meet the underserved needs of the homeless population through participation in a county-wide Continuum of Care process.

Supportive Services — The City will continue its support of applications by public and private social service agencies to expand support services to help meet underserved needs. The City will provide CDBG funding for a variety of public services in Roseville.

3. Evaluation of past performance
This is an evaluation of past performance that helped lead the grantee to choose its goals or projects.

During PY 2024, the City expended CDBG funds on eligible activities that primarily benefit low- and moderate-income persons. Consistent with the goals outlined in the Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan, CDBG funds supported public services, public facility improvements, and housing rehabilitation activities. These programs were designed to address the needs of vulnerable populations, including seniors, individuals and families experiencing homelessness, and households at risk of homelessness.

The PY 2024 Action Plan included a proposed project to support the development of affordable rental housing through property acquisition for future development, anticipated to benefit four lowincome households and advance the City’s Consolidated Plan goal of increasing affordable housing opportunities. Due to insufficient funding to attract viable development proposals or meaningfully advance a project, the City postponed issuing a Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) and carried forward $392,336 to PY 2025 to combine with additional resources. In PY 2025, the City issued the Affordable Housing Acquisition Project NOFA on three separate occasions; however, no viable or eligible proposals were received. As a result, the City was unable to proceed with awarding funds, and the full $700,000 allocation will be reprogrammed to the PY 2026 Action Plan for a different eligible activity that will allow for more effective and timely use of CDBG funds.

Over the course of PY 2024, the Housing Division assisted 1,552 low-income individuals and four low-income households through CDBG and other housing and community development programs.

CDBG-funded activities supported housing rehabilitation, public services, and programs providing homeless shelter and homelessness prevention services. In addition, a portion of CDBG funds supported administrative costs necessary for the Housing Division to effectively manage and implement these programs.

Overall, PY 2024 activities contributed to the City’s ongoing efforts to improve housing stability, expand access to essential services, and address the needs of vulnerable residents. Lessons learned from program implementation, including the need to align funding levels with feasible project opportunities, have informed the City’s planning and funding strategies for the upcoming program year.

Annual Action Plan
2026
5 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
The Roseville Housing Authority (federal rental assistance program) assisted 781 households with $10,549,060 million in rental subsidies. This includes regular Housing Choice Vouchers, NonElderly Disabled (NED) vouchers, Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing (VASH) vouchers, Mainstream Vouchers, Emergency Housing Vouchers, Foster Youth Initiative, and Project-Based Vouchers.

The City uses other Federal, State and local resources when available, including Housing Choice Voucher Rental Assistance Contracts, State-administered HOME funds, and local developer contributions to address housing and community development priority needs identified in the Consolidated Plan.

4. Summary of Citizen Participation Process and consultation process Summary from citizen participation section of plan.

Throughout the preparation of the Annual Action Plan, City staff sought input and collected data for the Plan from interested citizens, housing providers, service providers, local agencies and nonprofit organizations. The City encouraged others to participate in the development of the Plan via public notice and invitations to a public meeting to more than one hundred regional and local services agencies, non-profit organizations, city staff, and interested individuals. Notices were published in the Roseville Press Tribune in both English and Spanish. Notices were emailed to community organizations serving low-income and homeless populations, the Hispanic community and service providers.

Public meetings were held in January 2026 and May 2026. For those unable to attend the public meetings the invitation encouraged written comments to be submitted.

The January 2026 meeting began the Action Plan process; the purpose of the Plan was discussed during this meeting. Those attending the meeting were encouraged to identify community needs and proposed strategies for meeting those needs. This meeting was followed by a hybrid applicant workshop which discussed the 2026/2027 application for CDBG funding. Seven staff from six agencies attended the CDBG 2026/27 Community Workshop. Agencies present were: PRIDE Industries, Unity Care, The Taylor House, Big Brother Big Sisters, Latino Leadership Council and AMI Housing.

Notices of funding availability were published in the Roseville Press Tribune in both English and Spanish. Notices were emailed to community organizations serving low-income and homeless populations, the Hispanic community and service providers.

Applications for funding requests for the 2026 Program Year were accepted online. The City received $227,500 in public services grant requests.

Funding for the public services category is subject to a 15% federal cap. According to the City’s PY 2026 allocation of $707,327, plus 15% of program income received in program year 2025, the maximum amount available for public service activities is $117,418.50.

Annual Action Plan
2026
6 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
On April 3, 2026, the draft 2026 Annual Action Plan for the CDBG program was made available for public review at the City’s Housing Division office, at the City’s Public Library locations, and electronically on the City of Roseville Housing Division CDBG webpage to ensure broad public access. The public comment period will be open for at least 30 days from April 3, 2026 through May 6, 2026. A public hearing will be held before the Roseville City Council on May 6, 2026 to receive public comments on the draft Action Plan. [Pending – Public comment period closes on May 6, 2026. Any comments received and responses will be included in the final Action Plan.] Notices announcing the availability of the draft Action Plan and the public hearing were published in the Roseville Press Tribune in both English and Spanish. Notices were also emailed to community organizations serving low-income residents, individuals experiencing homelessness, members of the Hispanic community, and other local service providers.

5. Summary of public comments
This could be a brief narrative summary or reference an attached document from the Citizen Participation section of the Con Plan.

The City provided notice to dozens of local agencies and individuals on the City's grants interest list, published notices in both English and Spanish, and provided a public comment period in excess of the required 30 day period.

During the public comment period and community meetings, residents and stakeholders provided input regarding housing, homelessness, and community service needs. The following summarizes the key themes expressed by community members.

A community member submitted a comment regarding the impacts of homeless encampments on local wildlife habitat and waterways, particularly in riparian areas where debris can accumulate and affect creek conditions and public health. The commenter noted concerns about endangered salmon and ongoing community creek cleanup efforts and suggested that reducing homelessness, including through increased housing opportunities, may help address these impacts. The commenter also encouraged the City to explore potential government funding opportunities, such as state programs, to support creek cleanup efforts.

Community members provided comments regarding housing instability, homelessness, and service gaps affecting vulnerable populations. One commenter emphasized the need for increased resources to address homelessness, including permanent supportive housing and the conversion of existing buildings for housing opportunities, and highlighted the challenges faced by individuals with severe mental illness and families with students experiencing homelessness. Another commenter noted increasing demand for youth services, particularly for transitional-aged youth experiencing mental health challenges, and encouraged continued investment in mental health support and mentoring programs to improve youth wellbeing and educational outcomes. A third commenter described growing financial hardship among families in the community, including increased need for rental assistance and prevention services, and expressed concern about

Annual Action Plan
2026
7 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
reduced funding from other sources for non-profit programs that provide behavioral health and early intervention services, which may leave additional gaps in support for vulnerable households. [Pending – Public comment period closes on May 6, 2026. Any additional comments received and responses will be included in the final Action Plan.]

6. Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting them
The City considers and reviews all comments received during the public participation process. [Pending – Public comment period closes on May 6, 2026. Any comments received and responses will be included in the final Action Plan.]

7. Summary
The following notices were provided regarding the draft 2026 Annual Action Plan.

NOTICE OF FUNDING AVAILABILITY (NOFA) FOR THE 2026/27 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) AND HOMELESS PREVENTION AND RAPID REHOUSING (HPRR) FUNDS; AND

NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING FOR THE CDBG AND HPRR APPLICANT WORKSHOP AND PREPARATION OF THE 2026 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN

1. 12/4/25 emailed all applicant contacts for CDBG and grants distribution list

2. 12/4/25 sent to list administrators of Continuum of Care

3. 12/5/25 posted on City website

4. 12/5/25 published in the Roseville Press Tribune

5. 12/5/25 sent to list administrators and membership of Placer Collaborative Network e-mail listserv [email protected] (Eileen Speaker)

6. 12/16/25 notice of public meeting sent out via “We Are Roseville” electronic newsletter to City residents

NOTICE OF PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD AND PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM

6. 4/3/26 posted on the City’s website

7. 4/3/26 posted on City Hall bulletin board

8. 4/3/26 sent to list administrators and membership of Placer Collaborative Network e-mail listserv [email protected] (Eileen Speaker); Continuum of Care; Latino Leadership Council

9. 4/3/26 published in the Roseville Press Tribune
Please find attached supporting documentation including proof of publication.

Community Needs and Applicant Workshop
On January 8, 2026 the City held a hybrid community meeting to solicit public comments on local priority needs that guided the preparation of the City of Roseville’s 2026 Annual Action Plan. This meeting was followed by a hybrid applicant workshop which discussed the 2026/2027 application for CDBG funding. Seven staff from six agencies attended the CDBG 2026/27 Community

Annual Action Plan
2026
8 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Workshop. Agencies present were: PRIDE Industries, Unity Care, The Taylor House, Big Brother Big Sisters, Latino Leadership Council and AMI Housing.

During the community meeting, commenters discussed several housing and community service needs. Participants emphasized the importance of addressing homelessness through increased housing and supportive services, particularly for individuals with mental health challenges and families experiencing housing instability. Commenters also highlighted the need for expanded youth services and mental health support programs. In addition, community members noted growing financial hardship among families and the need for rental assistance and prevention services, as well as concerns about potential reductions in funding from other sources that support non-profit service providers. The City appreciates the community’s input and will continue to consider these perspectives when implementing housing and community development programs.

Draft Annual Action Plan Publication
On April 3, 2026, the draft 2026 Annual Action Plan for CDBG was made available for review at the City’s Housing Division Office 316 Vernon Street, Ste. 150, at the City’s Public Library locations, and on the City of Roseville Housing Division CDBG page, found on the Housing Division webpage at: www.roseville.ca.us/housing. The draft 2026 Annual Action Plan will also be published as part of the agenda for the May 6, 2026 City Council meeting. [Pending – Please see the attached agenda report and minutes of the meeting.] Copies of the document will be made available to the public free of charge within five days of a request.
30 Day Public Comment Period
The draft Action Plan will be available for public comment from April 3, 2026 to May 6, 2026. [Pending – Public comment period closes on May 6, 2026. Any comments received and responses will be included in the final Action Plan.]
Public Hearing
On May 6, 2026 the City Council will hold a public hearing at a regularly scheduled meeting. In addition to the public notices described above, the City publishes the agenda of City Council meetings. The public will be afforded the opportunity to address the Council at the hearing. [Pending – Public comment period closes on May 6, 2026. Any comments received and responses will be included in the final Action Plan.] [The Roseville City Council will consider adoption of the 2026 Annual Action Plan and staff recommendations for funding at its meeting on May 6, 2026.]

Annual Action Plan
2026
9 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies – 91.200(b)

1. Agency/entity responsible for preparing/administering the Consolidated Plan Describe the agency/entity responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source.

Agency Role Name Department/Agency
CDBG Administrator ROSEVILLE Economic Development Department - Housing Division Table 1 – Responsible Agencies
Narrative (optional)
The City of Roseville Housing Division serves as the lead agency for administering HUD Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds and implementing the Consolidated Plan and the Annual Action Plans.

Consolidated Plan Public Contact Information
Dani O’Connell, Housing Analyst Trisha Isom, Housing Manager City of Roseville - Housing Division City of Roseville - Housing Division 316 Vernon Street Ste. 150 316 Vernon Street Ste. 150
Roseville, CA 95678 Roseville, CA 95678
Tel: (916) 774-5277 Tel: (916) 746-1239
Fax: (916) 746-1295 Fax: (916) 746-1295
[email protected] [email protected]

Annual Action Plan
2026
10 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
AP-10 Consultation – 91.100, 91.200(b), 91.215(l)

1. Introduction
The consolidated planning process requires jurisdictions to contact and consult with other public and private agencies when developing the Annual Action Plan. The Plan itself must include a summary of the consultation process, including identification of the agencies that participated in the process. Jurisdictions are required to summarize their efforts to enhance coordination between public and private agencies.

Provide a concise summary of the jurisdiction’s activities to enhance coordination between public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, mental health and service agencies (91.215(l)) In preparing the Annual Action Plan, the City consulted with various organizations located in Roseville and Placer County that provide services to low-income residents of Roseville. In many instances, these consultations are part of ongoing interactions between Roseville's Housing Division and the agency or group described.

City of Roseville

1. City Council - Conducts a public hearing prior to authorization of the submission of the Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan to HUD.

2. City of Roseville Housing Division - Responsible for development of the Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan governing the use of CDBG funding, including the citizen participation process. Administers the CDBG program and State of California HOME funded activities.

3. City of Roseville Development Services Department Planning Division - Reviews CDBG and HOME funded development projects to determine whether proposed development activities comply with the General Plan and Zoning Code; is responsible for drafting the Roseville General Plan 2035, adopted in 2020, including the Housing Element which was updated and certified in 2021. The update has been cited throughout this Plan as the Housing Element of the General Plan 2021-2029.

4. City of Roseville Economic Development Department - Provides assistance with business needs such as starting or expanding a business, finding a site, or connecting with other City services.

5. Roseville Housing Authority - Addresses the housing needs of extremely low- and low-income residents in the City through a variety of programs including the Housing Choice Voucher Program.

Annual Action Plan
2026
11 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
County of Placer

1. Placer County Community Development Department, Planning Services Division - Coordinates the housing programs and funding. Responsible for drafting the Placer County General Plan Housing Element, as well as an incentive program intended to encourage the development of new affordable housing units in the unincorporated areas.

2. Placer County Department of Health and Human Services, Behavioral Health Division - Provides information regarding the needs of Placer County residents who have mental disabilities. Representatives of this division also participate in various Continuum of Care working groups.

3. Placer County Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Division - Provides information regarding the potential of lead-based paint hazards in the county.

Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness.

Significant aspects of the Consolidated Plan development process included consultations with the Homeless Resource Council of the Sierras (HRCS) which acts as the Nevada-Placer Continuum of Care (CoC), Placer Collaborative Network (PCN), and the Placer Consortium on Homelessness (PCOH). Efforts to address the needs of homeless persons are described in greater detail later in this Plan.

The PCOH is a regional planning group of the HRCS. Representatives include members from the faith-based community, nonprofits, businesses, and City and County government. The CoC’s annual submissions to HUD reflect the demographics, needs and available shelter, housing, and services in all three HUD entitlement grantees within its jurisdiction to provide a cohesive shelter system throughout the County.

A complete inventory of facilities and services provided throughout Placer County, including Roseville, is identified on the Homeless Resource Council of the Sierras Continuum of Care website at www.hrcscoc.org.

Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the jurisdiction's area in determining how to allocate ESG funds, develop performance standards for and evaluate outcomes of projects and activities assisted by ESG funds, and develop funding, policies and procedures for the operation and administration of HMIS

Annual Action Plan
2026
12 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Homeless Resource Council of the Sierras (HRCS) Governance Board The City of Roseville collaborates with HRCS (the Nevada-Placer Continuum of Care) to address the needs of people experiencing or at risk of homelessness. The Continuum of Care for Roseville/Rocklin/Placer County is a standing advisory committee to the Homeless Resource Council of the Sierras (HRCS) and brings people together in collaboration to develop, coordinate and support projects, services and resources that will enhance our partners’ ability to prevent and end homelessness in Placer County. HRCS is the “collaborative applicant” and administrative entity for the Placer and Nevada counties' continuums of care. Efforts are aimed at permanent solutions, and the range of services is designed to meet the unique and complex needs of individuals who are currently experiencing homelessness or are at risk of becoming homeless. HRCS and the CoC respond to and implement HUD's Policy and Program Priorities and oversee all planning processes, the regional planning groups, committees, and the Program and Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) application processes. A HRCS subcommittee administers the Rating and Ranking process Regional Planning Groups
Three Regional Planning Groups are directly involved in CoC-wide planning activities including setting priorities, reviewing performance data, project review and selection, discharge planning, the Consolidated Application, and conducting homeless counts. Each addresses homelessness in its own area and then forwards that information to the Governance Board. The Placer Consortium on Homelessness (PCOH) covers the more populated western part of Placer County that includes Roseville, Rocklin, Lincoln, Loomis, Auburn, and the foothills. The Nevada County Coordinating Council addresses Nevada City, Grass Valley, North San Juan, Penn Valley, and Alta Sierra.

The Tahoe Truckee Homelessness Group covers both counties in the greater North Lake Tahoe and Truckee region.

These regional planning groups ensure that homeless needs from all areas of the CoC are represented. The groups are inclusive, and all those involved with homeless services are recruited. The CoC supports currently or formerly homeless individuals in attending; extensive e-mail to listserv groups is used to reach out to all sectors of the CoC areas. The HRCS Board is representative of all areas of the CoC and all targeted homeless populations. To maximize funding opportunities, there are two continuums; CA-515 and CA531. HRCS is the collaborative applicant and coordinator amongst the two Continuums of Care.

Outcomes and Measurements
The Outcomes and Measurements Committee addresses the CoC's overall outcomes, application ranking, as well as monitoring the writing of the homeless strategies plan. The Committee sets selection criteria and organizes the Rating and Ranking panels for specific funding sources such as the CoC Program and ESG funds. The Committee is responsible for developing performance measurements and

Annual Action Plan
2026
13 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
reviews all CoC Program and ESG-funded projects on an annual basis. The Committee presents its work to the regional planning groups and the HRCS Governance Board.

The Outcomes and Measurements Committee uses a rating and ranking panel that is responsible for developing, implementing, and improving the Coordinated Assessment process and the ESG Written Standards for identifying areas where the CoC Program and the ESG Programs should be integrated. No jurisdiction within the two counties receives ESG funds directly from HUD; therefore, the agencies must apply to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for ESG funds

2. Describe Agencies, groups, organizations and others who participated in the process and describe the jurisdiction’s consultations with housing, social service agencies and other entities Table 2 – Agencies, groups, organizations who participated 1 Agency/Group/Organization Latino Leadership Council
Agency/Group/Organization Type Community services
Services-Housing
Services-Homeless
Services- Health
Services-Education
Services-Employment
Services-Victims of Domestic Violence
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Community services
Housing Need Assessment
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Anti-poverty Strategy

Annual Action Plan
2026
14 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization
was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes
of the consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
The agency participated in and provided feedback regarding community needs during the CDBG Community Needs Workshop on 1/8/26. The agency received notice of the draft Annual Action Plan and the opportunity for public review and comment. Public service agency consultations assist the City to prioritize funding and to identify trends in housing and human service needs.
2 Agency/Group/Organization PRIDE Industries
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Persons with Disabilities Services-Employment
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Anti-poverty Strategy
Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization
was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes
of the consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
The agency participated in the CDBG Community Needs Workshop on 1/8/26. The agency received notice of the draft Annual Action Plan and the opportunity for public review and comment. Public service agency consultations assist the City to prioritize funding and to identify trends in housing and human service needs.
3 Agency/Group/Organization AMI Housing
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services - Housing
Services - Homeless
Services – Health
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Homelessness Strategy

Annual Action Plan
2026
15 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization
was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes
of the consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
The agency participated in the CDBG Community Needs Workshop on 1/8/26. The agency received notice of the draft Annual Action Plan and the opportunity for public review and comment. Public service agency consultations assist the City to prioritize funding and to identify trends in housing and human service needs.
4 Agency/Group/Organization The Taylor House
Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing
Services – Homeless
Services – Children
Services – Employment
Services – Education
Services – Health
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization
was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes
of the consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
The agency participated in the CDBG Community Needs Workshop on 1/8/26. The agency received notice of the draft Annual Action Plan and the opportunity for public review and comment. Public service agency consultations assist the City to prioritize funding and to identify trends in housing and human service needs.
6 Agency/Group/Organization Big Brothers Big Sisters of Greater Sacramento Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Children
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs

Annual Action Plan
2026
16 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization
was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes
of the consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
The agency participated in and provided feedback regarding community needs during the CDBG Community Needs Workshop on 1/18/26. The agency received notice of the draft Annual Action Plan and the opportunity for public review and comment. Public service agency consultations assist the City to prioritize funding and to identify trends in housing and human service needs.
7 Agency/Group/Organization Unity Care Group
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Children
Services-Persons with Disabilities
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization
was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes
of the consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
The agency participated in the CDBG Community Needs Workshop on 1/8/26. The agency received notice of the draft Annual Action Plan and the opportunity for public review and comment. Public service agency consultations assist the City to prioritize funding and to identify trends in housing and human service needs.
8 Agency/Group/Organization Roseville Advocates for the Homeless Agency/Group/Organization Type Services – Homeless
Civic Leaders
Housing
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Strategy

Annual Action Plan
2026
17 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization
was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes
of the consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
The agency participated in and provided feedback regarding community needs during the CDBG Community Needs Workshop on 1/8/26. The agency received notice of the draft Annual Action Plan and the opportunity for public review and comment. Public service agency consultations assist the City to prioritize funding and to identify trends in housing and human service needs.
9 Agency/Group/Organization City of Roseville – Public Works Department Agency/Group/Organization Type Grantee Department
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Non-Housing Community Development Needs
Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization
was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes
of the consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
The Department was consulted to identify Public Facilities and Improvements needs. The Department received notice of the draft Annual Action Plan and the opportunity for public review and comment.

Inter-departmental consultations help the City prioritize funding, coordinate resources, and identify trends in Public Works needs.

Annual Action Plan
2026
18 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
10 Agency/Group/Organization Placer Collaborative Network (PCN) Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Housing
Services-Children
Services-Elderly Persons
Services-Persons with Disabilities
Services-Persons with HIV/AIDS
Services-Victims of Domestic Violence
Services-Homeless
Services-Health
Services-Employment
Service-Fair Housing
Services-Victims
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Homeless Needs-Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs-Families with children
Homelessness Needs-Veterans
Homelessness Needs-Unaccompanied youth
Homelessness Strategy
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization
was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes
of the consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
The City published information related to CDBG document preparation and review opportunities through Placer Collaborative Network's (PCN's) e-mail list. This consultation ensures stakeholders are informed, can provide input, and helps improve coordination and alignment across county programs and initiatives.

Annual Action Plan
2026
19 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
11 Agency/Group/Organization Lighthouse Counseling & Family Resource Center Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Children
Services-Victims of Domestic Violence
Services - Victims
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization
was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes
of the consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
The agency was consulted through the City’s outreach process, including direct email notifications and opportunities to provide input on community needs and the draft Annual Action Plan. Public service agency consultations assist the City to prioritize funding and to identify trends in housing and human service needs.
12 Agency/Group/Organization Seniors First
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services - Elderly Persons What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization
was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes
of the consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
The agency was consulted through the City’s outreach process, including direct email notifications and opportunities to provide input on community needs and the draft Annual Action Plan. Public service agency consultations assist the City to prioritize funding and to identify trends in housing and human service needs.

Annual Action Plan
2026
20 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
13 Agency/Group/Organization Saint Vincent de Paul Society, Roseville Area Conference Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Elderly Persons Services-Persons with Disabilities
Services-Homeless
Services-Health
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization
was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes
of the consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
The agency was consulted through the City’s outreach process, including direct email notifications and opportunities to provide input on community needs and the draft Annual Action Plan. Public service agency consultations assist the City to prioritize funding and to identify trends in housing and human service needs.
14 Agency/Group/Organization Stand Up Placer, Inc.

Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Victims of Domestic Violence Services - Victims
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization
was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes
of the consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
The agency was consulted through the City’s outreach process, including direct email notifications and opportunities to provide input on community needs and the draft Annual Action Plan. Public service agency consultations assist the City to prioritize funding and to identify trends in housing and human service needs.

Annual Action Plan
2026
21 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
15 Agency/Group/Organization The Gathering Inn
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services - Housing
Services – Homeless
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Homelessness Strategy
Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization
was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes
of the consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
The agency was consulted through the City’s outreach process, including direct email notifications and opportunities to provide input on community needs and the draft Annual Action Plan. Public service agency consultations assist the City to prioritize funding and to identify trends in housing and human service needs.
16 Agency/Group/Organization The Salvation Army Roseville Corps Agency/Group/Organization Type Services - Housing
Services-homeless
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Homelessness Strategy
Anti-poverty Strategy

Annual Action Plan
2026
22 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization
was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes
of the consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
The agency was consulted through the City’s outreach process, including direct email notifications and opportunities to provide input on community needs and the draft Annual Action Plan. Public service agency consultations assist the City to prioritize funding and to identify trends in housing and human service needs.

Identify any Agency Types not consulted and provide rationale for not consulting The City of Roseville contacted all known agencies working with lower-income residents and neighborhoods regarding development of the Annual Action Plan.

Other local/regional/state/federal planning efforts considered when preparing the Plan Name of Plan Lead Organization How do the goals of your Strategic Plan overlap with the goals of each plan? Continuum of
Care
Homeless Resource
Council of the Sierras
(HRCS)
Serving the basic needs of the homeless community is the CoCs primary concern.

The City of Roseville Consolidated Plan identifies addressing homelessness as a high priority need and is a goal of the Annual Action Plan.

Table 3 – Other local / regional / federal planning efforts Narrative (optional)
Broadband issues are a concern for low-income residents. The City’s Housing Authority has provided information regarding low cost internet service to its clients, and information has been advertised through the City’s social media and city newsletter platforms. This service is called the Affordable Connectivity Program and it provides households $30 a month to cover the cost of internet service.

Regarding disaster resiliency, the City has a partnership with Placer County’s 211, which provides residents with information, local services, emergency or disaster recover assistance. Additionally, the City has an Emergency Management Team that operates during emergencies but also meets regularly to be prepared for emergencies of all types. The City will continue to seek consultation on this in the future and continue to work to address these issues as they come up.

Annual Action Plan
2026
23 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
AP-12 Participation – 91.105, 91.200(c)

1. Summary of citizen participation process/Efforts made to broaden citizen participation Summarize citizen participation process and how it impacted goal-setting The City gathers input from the community throughout the year, including calls from residents and participation in stakeholder meetings, to identify local needs and potential projects. In addition, the City conducts a community meeting and a public hearing, accompanied by public notices published in the local English-language newspaper. To engage the Spanish-speaking community, the City provides translated notices in Spanish in the same newspaper, posts them on the City website, and distributes them to the Latino Leadership Council, a local organization comprised of nonprofit agencies and community groups. Feedback collected through these efforts helps the City identify priority needs and informs the development of goals, strategies, and funding allocations in the Action Plan.

Citizen Participation Outreach
Sort
Order
Mode of
Outreach
Target of Outreach Summary of
response/attendance
Summary of
comments
received
Summary of
comments not
accepted and
reasons
URL (If
applicable)
1 Newspaper
Ad
Non-English
Speaking
- Specify other
language: Spanish
Nontargeted/broad
community
12/5/25 - Notice published
in the Roseville Press
Tribune announcing the
Action Plan planning
process and dates of
community meetings.
4/3/26 - Notice published
in the Roseville Press
Tribune announcing the
notice of draft Action Plan
availability and date of
public hearing.

Any public
comments
received are
summarized in
AP-05 above
and were
considered in
the preparation
of the final
Action Plan.

All comments
were accepted.

N/A

Annual Action Plan
2026
24 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
2 Internet
Outreach
Minorities
Non-English
Speaking
- Specify other
language: Spanish
Persons with
disabilities
Nontargeted/broad
community
Residents of
Public and
Assisted Housing
12/5/25 - Notice posted on
City webpage announcing
the annual planning
process, dates of
community meetings and
information regarding how
to apply for funds.
12/16/25 – Notice of
public meeting sent out
via “We Are Roseville”
electronic newsletter to
City residents.
4/3/26 - Notice posted on
City webpage announcing
the draft action plan
availability, date of public
hearing.

Any public
comments
received are
summarized in
AP-05 above
and were
considered in
the preparation
of the final
Action Plan.

All comments
were accepted.
www.roseville.c
a.us/housing -
The CDBG
program page is
accessed by
clicking on →
“Community
Development
Block Grant” at
the bottom of
the homepage.
3 Email Minorities
Non-English
Speaking - Specify
other language:

Spanish
Persons with
disabilities
12/4/25 - Email sent
to list of interested
persons and stakeholders
announcing the annual
planning process, dates of
community meetings.
4/3/26 - Email sent to
Placer Collaborative
Network listserv
announcing the notice of
Any public
comments
received are
summarized in
AP-05 above
and were
considered in
the preparation
of the final
Action Plan.

All comments
were accepted.

N/A

Annual Action Plan
2026
25 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Nontargeted/broad
community
Residents of
Public and
Assisted Housing
draft Action Plan
availability and date of
public hearing.
4 Public
Meeting
Minorities
Non-English
Speaking - Specify
other language:

Spanish
Persons with
disabilities
Nontargeted/broad
community
Residents of
Public and
Assisted Housing
1/8/26 - A public meeting
was held at 2:00 p.m. The
meeting was conducted in
person and was also
accessible remotely.

Three members of the
public attended in person,
and four attended
remotely, in addition to
three City staff.

Any public
comments
received are
summarized in
AP-05 above
and were
considered in
the preparation
of the final
Action Plan.

All comments
were accepted.

N/A
5 Public
Hearing
Nontargeted/broad
community
[Pending – Public hearing
will be held on May 6,
2026. A summary will be
included in the final Action
Plan.]
[Pending –
Public
comment
period closes
on May 6, 2026.

Any comments
received and
responses will
be included in
[Pending –
Public
comment
period closes
on May 6, 2026.

Any comments
received and
responses will
be included in
N/A

Annual Action Plan
2026
26 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
the final Action
Plan.]
the final Action
Plan.]
Table 4 – Citizen Participation Outreach

Annual Action Plan
2026
27 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Expected Resources
AP-15 Expected Resources – 91.220(c)(1,2)
Introduction
During the five-year Consolidated Plan period, the City estimates receipt of $700,000 annually in CDBG funds from HUD and $50,000 annually in program income generated by previous CDBG funded activities. The City primarily uses CDBG funds for public services, housing and homeless activities and administrative costs. The table below provides a breakdown of anticipated CDBG funding over the first year of the planning period.

In addition to CDBG funding received directly from HUD, the City currently has approximately $619,000 in State of California HOME funds (all Program Income) available for housing rehabilitation and administrative costs.

The City has been notified that its 2026 CDBG award amount is $707,327. The City is also reprogramming $732,715.34 in prior year carryover funds, consisting of $32,715.34 in unexpended (deobligated) funds and $700,000 in uncommitted funds. Any additional carryover funds, currently estimated but not yet finalized, will be allocated to the Owner-Occupied Housing Rehabilitation Program (OOR) activity.

Anticipated Resources
Program Source
of
Funds
Uses of
Funds
Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected
Amount
Available
Remainder of
ConPlan
$
Narrative Description
Annual
Allocation:
$
Program
Income:
$
Prior Year
Resources:
$
Total:
$

Annual Action Plan
2026
28 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
CDBG public -
federal
Admin and
Planning
Public
Services
Housing
Public
Facilities and
Improvements
707,327 50,000 732,715.34 1,490,042.34 2,100,000
The City has been notified
that its 2026 CDBG award
amount is $707,327. The City
anticipates receiving $50,000
in CDBG program income
available for FY2026-27. In
addition, the City has
$32,715.34 in prior-year
deobligated (unexpended)
funds and $700,000.00 in
prior-year uncommitted
funds available for
reprogramming.

Table 5 - Expected Resources – Priority Table
Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied The City’s CDBG and State of California HOME funds are often coupled with local funds, allowing capital projects to compete for tax credits, bonds, and other state financing programs. An investment by the City makes projects more competitive under many funding programs. The City’s public service grants are limited to $25,000 to encourage programs to use CDBG as leverage for other funding sources. The City uses local funds as explained below to leverage CDBG public service funding available for low- and moderateincome residents.

The HUD CDBG Entitlement program and the State HOME program do not require matching funds. However, the City is committed to being as creative as possible to seek local, state, federal, and private resources to develop and deliver efficient and costeffective projects.

Annual Action Plan
2026
29 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
If appropriate, describe publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan
The City owns one piece of surplus property which was released in an RFP in the spring of 2025. The property is located at the corner of Royer Street and Taylor Street and as part of the City’s Downtown Specific Plan, will prioritize development of a 100% affordable housing project. The City is in talks with one affordable housing developer to deliver an affordable housing project in the future.

Discussion
The City of Roseville Citizen's Benefit Fund was established in 1993 following the sale of the city-owned Roseville Hospital. The proceeds were placed in a trust and a portion of the interest earned each year is made available for grants with the purpose of improving the quality of life for the citizens of Roseville. Public agencies, schools and non-profit 501(c)3 or 501(c)4 are eligible to apply.

The Roseville Employees Annual Charitable Hearts Fund (REACH) is a community giving fund created through the generosity of Roseville employees and retirees. These employee-donated funds are dispersed to local charitable organizations that serve youth, seniors and families in the South Placer County region.

Annual Action Plan
2026
30 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Annual Goals and Objectives
AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives
Goals Summary Information
Sort
Order
Goal Name Start
Year
End
Year
Category Geographic
Area
Needs Addressed Funding Goal Outcome
Indicator
1 Provision of
Services for
Low-Mod
Income
Persons
2025 2029 Homeless NonHomeless
Special Needs
Shelter, Housing,
Services to
Address
Homelessness
Services for
Seniors and
Persons with
Disabilities
Services for
Sexual
Assault/Dom.

Violence Victims
Food and
Nutrition Services
for Low/Mod
Persons
CDBG:
$98,750.00
Public service
activities other
than
Low/Moderate
Income
Housing
Benefit: 547
Persons
Assisted
2 Rehabilitation
of OwnerOccupied
2025 2029 Affordable
Housing
Maintain Existing
Homeownership
Housing Stock
CDBG:
$180,000.00
Homeowner
Housing
Rehabilitated:

Annual Action Plan
2026
31 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Housing 4 Household
Housing Unit
3 Provide Fair
Housing Services
2025 2029 Fair Housing Fair Housing Services CDBG:
$16,000.00
Public service
activities other
than
Low/Moderate
Income Housing
Benefit:
- 50 Persons
Assisted
4 Infrastructure
Accessibility
Improvements
2025 2029 Non-Housing
Community
Development
Infrastructure and Public
Facilities
CDBG:
$1,003,827.34
Public Facility or
Infrastructure
Activities other than
Low/Moderate
Income Housing
Benefit:
613 Persons
Assisted

Annual Action Plan
2026
32 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Goal Descriptions
1 Goal Name Provision of Services for Low-Mod Income Persons Goal
Description
Provision of needed services for low- and moderate-income seniors, youth, victims of domestic violence or sexual assault and persons with disabilities.
2 Goal Name Rehabilitation of Owner-Occupied Housing
Goal
Description
Provide financial assistance for rehabilitation of owner-occupied single-family homes. 3 Goal Name Provide Fair Housing Services
Goal
Description
Promote access to fair housing information within the community. Educate tenants and landlords regarding rights and responsibilities under Federal and State fair housing law. 4 Goal Name Infrastructure Accessibility Improvements
Goal
Description
Improve streets and sidewalks in low- and moderate-income neighborhoods to enhance pedestrian safety and/or reduce architectural barriers for persons with mobility impairments.

Annual Action Plan
2026
33 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Projects
AP-35 Projects – 91.220(d)
Introduction
During PY 2026, the City of Roseville will use CDBG funds to address the following needs identified in the 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan:

High Priority Needs:
• Shelter, housing, and services to address homelessness Priority Needs:
• Services for seniors and persons with disabilities
• Fair housing services
• Maintain existing homeownership housing stock
• Services for sexual assault/domestic violence victims • Infrastructure and Public Facilities
• Food and nutrition services for low- and moderate-income persons Projects
# Project
Name
1 Administration and Planning (2026-01)
2 Roseville Fair Housing Services (2026-02)
3 AMI Housing Homeless Housing Assistance (2026-03)
4 Seniors First Meals on Wheels (2026-04)
5 St. Vincent de Paul Society BAGS Home Delivery (2026-05) 6 St. Vincent de Paul Society Food Locker Staffing Support (2026-06) 7 Stand Up Placer Emergency Response and Crisis Support Initiative (2026-07) 8 Roseville Owner-Occupied Housing Rehabilitation Program (2026-08) 9 Sierra Gardens ADA Improvements (2026-09)
Table 7 - Project Information
Describe the reasons for allocation priorities and any obstacles to addressing underserved needs
All projects address priority needs in the 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan. Applications were

Annual Action Plan
2026
34 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
evaluated based on the following criteria: meeting a CDBG National Objective, CDBG eligibility, performance on prior year grants, monitoring compliance, administrative capacity, project feasibility and fiscal responsibility. Remaining funds were allocated to fair housing services, the Roseville Owner-Occupied Housing Rehabilitation Program, and Infrastructure Accessibility Improvements, including curb ramps to enhance accessibility, supporting safe and accessible public infrastructure for all residents, including seniors and people with disabilities.

Community and local service providers identified the need for more affordable housing as a high priority for Roseville. The most significant obstacle to creating affordable housing is the high cost of development in the region and throughout California. The Roseville Housing Division will continue to work with affordable housing developers to increase housing opportunities available and affordable to low-income residents over the course of the fiveyear Consolidated Plan.

Annual Action Plan
2026
35 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
AP-38 Project Summary
Project Summary Information
1 Project Name Administration and Planning (2026-01)
Target Area
Goals Supported
Needs Addressed
Funding CDBG: $141,465
Description §570.205 and 570.206. General program administration, planning, oversight and coordination of CDBG projects and programs.

Target Date 6/30/2027
Estimate the
number and type of
families that will
benefit from the
proposed
activities
Location Description
Planned Activities Program administrative costs. Administration and planning for the CDBG program.
2 Project Name Roseville Fair Housing Services (2026-02) Target Area
Goals Supported Provide Fair Housing Services
Needs Addressed Fair Housing Services
Funding CDBG: $16,000
Description §570.201(e) and 207(b)(4) Public Services. 570.208(a)(2) Low/Mod Limited Clientele Benefit. 05J Fair Housing Activities.

Fair housing services for low-income Roseville residents including fair housing counseling, in addition to education for tenants and landlords regarding rights and responsibilities under federal and State fair housing law.

Target Date 6/30/2027

Annual Action Plan
2026
36 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Estimate the
number and type of
families that will
benefit from the
proposed
activities
It is estimated that 50 individuals will receive fair housing counseling and education via intake, referral and outreach activities, and nine households will be assisted through complaint investigation and referral.

Location Description The program provides services to residents citywide. Offices are located at 1490 El Camino Real Santa Clara, CA 95050.

Planned Activities Project Sentinel will provide fair housing services for low-income Roseville residents including fair housing counseling, as well as education for tenants and landlords regarding rights and responsibilities under federal and State fair housing law. 3 Project Name AMI Housing Homeless Housing Assistance (2026-03) Target Area
Goals Supported Provision of Services for Low-Mod Income Persons Needs Addressed Shelter, Housing, Services to Address Homelessness Services for Seniors and Persons with Disabilities Food and Nutrition Services for Low/Mod Persons
Funding CDBG: $21,250.00
Description §570.201(e) and 207(b)(4) Public Services. 570.208(a)(2) Low/Mod Limited Clientele Benefit. 03T Homeless Programs. AMI Housing will provide case management services and food assistance to Roseville individuals with a mental illness who are homeless or at risk of homelessness.

Target Date 6/30/2027
Estimate the
number and type of
families that will
benefit from the
proposed
activities
It is estimated that AMI Housing will serve 15 extremely low- and very low-income households.

Annual Action Plan
2026
37 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Location Description Site address: 1112 William Way, Roseville CA 95678.

Administrative Office: 3123 Professional Drive, Ste 210 Auburn CA 95603.

Planned Activities The funding will be used to house Roseville residents with a mental illness who are homeless with very little income in AMI Housing’s transitional home in Roseville, "Maureen's House".

Case Manager (CM): CM will help individuals apply for mainstream benefits, food stamps, and employment. CM will work with individuals to create a recovery plan, access available Placer County Resources, medication management, medical services, life skills training, & to create a permanent housing plan. Case management will be provided on-site and off-site on an as needed basis.

Food Assistance: to house and provide food for low-income Roseville residents of Maureen’s House.
4 Project Name Seniors First Meals on Wheels (2026-04)
Target Area
Goals Supported Provision of Services for Low-Mod Income Persons Needs Addressed Services for Seniors and Persons with Disabilities Food and Nutrition Services for Low/Mod Persons
Funding CDBG: $15,000.00
Description §570.201(e) Public services. §570.208(a)(2) Low/Mod Limited Clientele benefit. 05A - Senior Services. Preparation and delivery of nutritious home-delivered meals to Roseville seniors age 60 and older who are homebound and unable to prepare meals or shop for themselves. The program also conducts wellness checks and provides social interaction for isolated seniors to enhance nutrition, health, connection, and independent living.

Target Date 6/30/2027
Estimate the
number and type of
families that will
benefit from the
proposed
activities
The program anticipates serving 44 low-income homebound seniors.

Annual Action Plan
2026
38 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Location Description The program serves meals to seniors living citywide. Offices are located at 2543 Warren Drive Rocklin, CA 95677.

Planned Activities Preparation and delivery of nutritious home-delivered meals to Roseville seniors age 60 and older who are homebound and unable to prepare meals or shop for themselves. The program also conducts wellness checks and provides social interaction for isolated seniors, contributing to improved well-being and the ability to age safely at home.
5 Project Name St. Vincent de Paul Society BAGS Home Delivery Program (2026-05) Target Area
Goals Supported Provision of Services for Low-Mod Income Persons Needs Addressed Services for Seniors and Persons with
Disabilities Food and Nutrition Services for
Low/Mod Persons
Funding CDBG: $17,500.00
Description §570.201(e) Public Services. §570.208(a)(2) Low/Mod Limited Clientele. 05A - Senior Services. The program addresses food insecurity and nutrition for low-income, homebound elderly and disabled adults. Volunteer teams deliver enough groceries in a variety sufficient to prepare a minimum of nine nutritious meals each month.

Target Date 6/30/2027
Estimate the
number and type of
families that will
benefit from the
proposed
activities
Program anticipates serving 85 low-income homebound elderly and disabled clients.

Location Description St. Vincent de Paul Society, Roseville Conference, 503 Giuseppe Court, Suite 8, Roseville, CA 95678. Food is distributed to homebound elderly and disabled clients citywide.

Planned Activities The BAGS Home Delivery program provides supplemental groceries delivered to low-income homebound elderly or disabled adults residing in the City of Roseville. Volunteer teams deliver enough groceries in a variety sufficient to prepare a minimum of (9) nutritious meals each month.