City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 5/6/2026
Item #: VI.22
File #: 0203-14
Item ID: 2026-317
Title: Cybersecurity Pentesting Services (RFP 12-038) – Contract Purchase Agreement Contact: Cesar Gamez 916-774-5408 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a contract purchase agreement with BreakPoint Labs, LLC with an estimated annual cost not to exceed $282,600 per year for Cybersecurity Pentesting Services, with an additional 10% contingency per year to accommodate minor adjustments to the scope of services. The agreement covers a three-year term with one optional renewal year. Funding for the first year is included in the Information Technology and Environmental Utilities FY2025-26 operations fund budgets.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve a Contract Purchase Agreement (3005332) with BreakPoint Labs, LLC, for Cybersecurity Pentesting Services and authorize the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
Staff further requested that they City Council authorize the City Manager or his designee to approve change orders, consistent with the contract terms, provided that the net cost of all change orders shall not exceed ten percent (10%) of the contract price.
BACKGROUND
The Information Technology, Public Works, Electric and Environmental Utilities departments perform cybersecurity penetration testing to help staff identify vulnerabilities in the City’s technology infrastructure, systems, and applications. These proactive assessments are a critical component of the City’s cybersecurity program, ensuring that emerging threats are addressed before they can be exploited.
Partnering with an experienced external provider ensures consistent, objective review and reinforces the City’s commitment to protecting data, maintaining reliable public services, and reducing organizational cyber risk. These tests also support compliance with industry best practices and strengthen the City’s overall security posture.
FISCAL IMPACT
The annual cost of the agreement is not to exceed $282,600 per year, plus a 10% contingency each year for the duration of the contract. The first year costs are included in the FY2025-26 Information Technology and Environmental Utilities operations fund budgets. Future year expenditures will be contingent upon Council approval of annual budgets and may include funding contributions from the Information Technology and Environmental Utilities operations funds, as well as the Electric Fund.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The
Contract Purchase Agreement meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
1. Ensure a safe and healthy community
4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth
6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Cesar Gamez, Information Security Administrator
Hong Sae, Chief Information Officer
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution 26-120
2. CPA 3005332
3. RFP 12-038 Ranking Sheet
REVIEWERS:
Cesar Gamez, Information Technology Department - Infrastructure Solutions Created/Initiated - 4/16/2026 Matthew Sweet, Information Technology Department Approved - 4/16/2026 Hong Sae, Information Technology Department Approved - 4/16/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 4/21/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 4/21/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 4/21/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 4/22/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 4/23/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 4/23/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 4/23/2026
RESOLUTION NO. 26-120
APPROVING A CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE
CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND BREAKPOINT LABS, LLC, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE WHEREAS, a Contract Purchase Agreement (3005332) for Cybersecurity Pentesting Services, by and between the City of Roseville and BreakPoint Labs, LLC, has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is hereby approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to approve change orders, consistent with the contract terms, provided that the net cost of all change orders shall not exceed ten percent (10%) of the contract price.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk
Contract Purchase Agreement 3005332
Supplier Details:
Company BreakPoint Labs LLC
Contact Denise Cole
Address 8116 Artinaton Blvd #255
Falls Church, VA 22042
Submit your response to:
Company City of Roseville
Contact Erica Kaminski
Address Purchasing Division
311 Vernon St
Roseville, CA 95678
Phone (916) 746-1108
Fax (916) 746-1115
E-mail [email protected]
This Contract Purchase Agreement is sent for your review and acceptance. Notify the Buyer via email of any needed changes to the company name, address, and contact information. The Buyer will update the agreement prior to you signing the document.
Return signed copies of the agreement to the Buyer noted on the agreement. Alterations or modifications to the agreement are not allowed. Upon receipt of all necessary documents, the City will sign the agreement and return a fully executed copy to you. Receipt of the signed copy will be your notice to proceed with the work in accordance with the terms and conditions of the agreement. Work must not begin until the contract has been fully executed.
The following guidelines must be followed for the signature block on the agreement:
Sole proprietorship - By owner
Partnership - Any general partner
Corporation - Two options:
(1) A signature from the President and the corporate seal; OR (2) One signature from the Chairman of the Board, President, or any Vice President AND one signature from the Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer, or any Treasurer or Assistant Treasurer of the corporation
*General Manager, Office Manager and/or Sales Manager are not corporate officer titles. The agreement will be rejected if not signed in accordance with these guidelines.
Insurance requirements:
The City's insurance requirements are referenced on Attachment A of the agreement. By signing the agreement, you are confirming that your company has the minimum insurance limits required. 1 Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
Contract Purchase Agreement 3005332
Agreement 3005332
Agreement Date 16-APR-2026
Revision 0
Agreement Amount 847,800.00 USD
Invoice To City of Roseville
Accounts Payable
311 Vernon St
ROSEVILLE CA 95678
Supplier BreakPoint Labs LLC
8116 Artinaton Blvd #255
Falls Church, VA 22042
Phone:
Fax:
Email:
(916) 774-5488
(916) 784-3796
[email protected]
Phone:
Fax:
Email:
()
()
[email protected]
Description of
Labor,
equipment
and/or materials
The vendor shall provide the services called for under the City of Roseville Request for Proposals (RFP) 12-038 for Cybersecurity Pentesting Services and contractor's proposal thereto titled "City of Roseville, California Cybersecurity Pentesting Services Request for Proposal #12-038" dated 3/12/26 (hereinafter "proposal"). The terms and scope of work of City of Roseville RFP 12-038 and contractor's proposal are herein made part of this agreement and fully incorporated by reference. All work must be quoted and approved in advance by the Information Technology (IT) Department.
Start Date: Executed Agreement
End Date: 36 Months from Date of Executed Agreement
Please contact Cesar Gamez in the IT Department at (916) 774-5408 or [email protected] for any questions regarding this agreement. *The total agreement amount is an approximation only. The City does not guarantee whatsoever the actual value of this contract.
Customer # Supplier # Payment Terms Freight Terms FOB Shipping Method 16854 Net 30 Freight on Board at the destination Destination Best Method Start Date End Date Confirm To
Erica Kaminski Phone 1-916-746-1108
Attention: Total Cost not to exceed the agreement amount without prior approval of the Purchasing office. 2 Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
Contract Purchase Agreement 3005332
Contract Terms and Conditions
1. To the fullest extent allowed by law, Consultant shall defend, indemnify, and save and hold harmless City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers from any claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought forth, or on account of, injuries to or death of any person (including but not limited to workers and the public), or damage to property, resulting from or arising out of Consultant's willful misconduct or negligent act or omission while engaged in the performance of obligations or exercise of rights created by this Agreement, except those matters arising from City's sole negligence or willful misconduct. The parties intend that this provision shall be broadly construed. Consultant's responsibility for such defense and indemnity obligations shall survive the termination or completion of this Agreement for the full period of time allowed by law. The defense and indemnity obligations of this agreement are undertaken in addition to, and shall not in any way be limited by, the insurance obligations contained in this Agreement.
2. Consultant is an independent contractor, and shall not be considered an officer, agent, or employee of the City.
3. Without the written consent of the City, this Agreement is not assignable by Consultant either in whole or in part.
4. Time is of the essence of this Agreement.
5. At any time during the term of this Agreement, the City has the right to terminate this Agreement, provided Consultant is given thirty (30) days written notice. City's termination shall be without further liability to City; however, Consultant shall be entitled to all costs reasonably incurred prior to the date of termination. Consultant acknowledges that City may terminate this Agreement should funds not be appropriated by its governing body to continue services under this Agreement.
6. This Agreement may only be amended or modified in writing. It is integrated and contains the complete understanding of the parties.
7. All equipment, supplies and services sold to the City of Roseville shall conform to the general safety orders of the State of California.
8. Unless notified to the contrary, in writing, the City assumes that the Consultant has accepted the work in accordance with the plans and specifications (if any) and agrees to do the work in compliance with this Agreement. Any work product created for City pursuant to this Agreement is deemed owned by City.
9. All prevailing wages and fair employment practices must be adhered to. For prevailing wage contracts over $25,000, copies of certified payroll must be submitted with invoices. Prevailing wage rates may be obtained from the State Department of Industrial Relations and/or the following website address:
http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/DPreWageDetermination.htm . In compliance with Labor Code Section 1773.2, as may be amended from time to time, Contractor shall cause a copy of this website to be posted at each jobsite, as applicable.
10. Consultant agrees to the below insurance requirements:
a. Unless otherwise specified, the Consultant shall maintain the policies of insurance outlined in Attachment A, incorporated herein by this reference, in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement. The City of Roseville retains sole discretion in determining the types and proper levels of insurance coverage. 3 Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
Contract Purchase Agreement 3005332
b. Form. Consultant shall submit a certificate evidencing such coverage for the period covered by this Agreement in a form satisfactory to Risk Management and the City Attorney, prior to undertaking any work hereunder. Any insurance written on a claims made basis is subject to the approval of Risk Management and the City Attorney. c. Additional Insureds. Consultant shall also provide a separate endorsement or section of the policy showing City, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers as additional insureds for each type of coverage, except for Workers' Compensation and Professional Liability. Such insurance shall specifically cover the contractual liability of Consultant.
The additional insured coverage under the Consultant's policy shall be primary and noncontributory, as evidenced by a separate endorsement or section of the policy and shall not seek contribution from City's insurance or self-insurance. In addition, the additional insured coverage shall be at least as broad as the Insurance Services Office (ISO) CG 20 01 Endorsement. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and limits shall be available to the additional insureds. Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be:
(1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this Agreement; or (2) the full coverage and maximum limits of any insurance proceeds available to the named insureds, whichever is greater.
d. Cancellation/Modification. Consultant shall provide thirty (30) days written notice to City prior to cancellation or modification of any insurance required by this Agreement. e. Umbrella/Excess Insurance. The limits of insurance required in this Agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and excess insurance. Any excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and noncontributory basis for the benefit of City (if agreed to in a written contract) before City's own insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured.
f. Subconsultants. Consultant agrees to include in its contracts with all subconsultants the same requirements and provisions of this Agreement, including the indemnity and insurance requirements, to the extent they apply to the scope of the subconsultants work.
Furthermore, Consultant shall require its subconsultants to agree to be bound to Consultant and City in the same manner and to the same extent as Consultant is bound to City under this Agreement. Additionally, Consultant shall obligate its subconsultants to comply with these same provisions with respect to any tertiary subconsultant, regardless of tier. A copy of City's indemnity and insurance provisions will be furnished to the subconsultant or tertiary subconsultant upon request.
g. Self-Insured Retentions. All self-insured retentions (SIR) must be disclosed to Risk Management for approval and shall not reduce the limits of liability. Policies containing any SIR provision shall provide or be endorsed to provide that the SIR may be satisfied by either the named insured or City. City reserves the right to obtain a full certified copy of any insurance policy and endorsements. The failure to exercise this right shall not constitute a waiver of such right.
h. Waiver of Subrogation. Consultant hereby agrees to waive subrogation which any insurer of Consultant may acquire from Consultant by virtue of the payment of any loss under a Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability or Automobile Liability policy.
All Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability policies shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of City, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers for all worked performed by Consultant, its employees, agents, and sub consultants.
i. Liability/Remedies. Insurance coverage in the minimum amounts set forth herein shall 4 Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
Contract Purchase Agreement 3005332
not be construed to relieve Consultant of liability in excess of such coverage, nor shall it preclude City from taking such other actions as are available to it under any other provisions of this Agreement or law.
11. Consultant shall comply with all federal, state, local laws, ordinances, and policies as may be applicable to the performance of services under this Agreement. Failure to comply with local ordinances may result in monetary fines and cancellation of this Agreement.
12. In the event that the terms of any attachment or exhibit conflict with any terms of this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall control.
13. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. In the event that any signature is delivered by facsimile transmission or by e-mail delivery of a ". pdf" format data file, such signature shall create a valid and binding obligation of the party executing (or on whose behalf such signature is executed) with the same force and effect as if such facsimile or ".pdf" signature page were an original thereof.
14. If either party commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement or the performance thereof, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including but not limited to, court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorneys' fees. Any action arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in Placer County, California, regardless of where else venue may lie. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
15. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, successors, executors, administrators and assigns of the respective parties hereto.
16. If any of the provisions contained in this Agreement are for any reason held invalid or unenforceable, such holding shall not affect the remaining provisions or the validity and enforceability of the Agreement as a whole.
17. For purposes of this Agreement, the terms "Contractor," "Consultant," and "Supplier" are used interchangeably.
18. Consultant agrees that any and all information furnished by City shall be deemed proprietary and confidential. All such information, to the extent previously, presently, or subsequently disclosed to Consultant and/or processed and derived by Consultant services is the property of City and such property shall be deemed and treated as "Confidential Information" of City.
Consultant acknowledges that such Confidential Information may contain information provided and/or generated by third-parties. Consultant agrees that such Confidential Information shall not be disclosed to any third party without written permission from City, except as required by law. Consultant shall not use the Confidential Information except to perform Consultant's services as directed by City.
19. All facilities, devices, networks, and services used to store, deliver, process, backup or purge Confidential Information will employ administrative, physical, technical, and procedural safeguards and best practices at a level sufficient to secure Confidential Information from unauthorized access, destruction, use, modification, or disclosure. Such measures will be no less protective than those used to secure Consultant's own information of a similar type, and in no event less than reasonable in view of the type and nature of the information involved. It is the City's expectation that Consultant, at its own expense, shall perform annual audits for any data centers that house Confidential Information, using an independent third-party audit that meets industry standards applicable to the services under this Agreement, and provide the audit report or certification upon request to City.
20. Consultant will retain Confidential Information until deleted by City or City-authorized third 5 Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
Contract Purchase Agreement 3005332
party, or for a time period mutually agreed upon by the parties to this Agreement.
21. Upon termination or expiration of this Agreement, Consultant will ensure that all Confidential Information is securely transferred to City within thirty (30) calendar days. Consultant will ensure that any transfer of Confidential Information is accomplished by methods that are compatible with the relevant City systems, and that City will have access to all Confidential Information during any such transfer. Consultant shall securely dispose of all Confidential Information when requested by City and Consultant will provide written notification to City once all Confidential Information has been securely disposed of.
22. Consultant shall report to City any data compromise or unauthorized access to Confidential Information within twenty-four (24) hours after Consultant discovers such data compromise or unauthorized access. Consultant will take commercially reasonable measures to address any such data compromise or unauthorized access in a timely manner. Except as otherwise required by law, Consultant will not provide notice to end users or other entities of any such data compromise or unauthorized access without written permission from City. Consultant will promptly reimburse City in full for all fees and costs incurred by City in any investigation, remediation or litigation resulting from any such data compromise or unauthorized access, including identity protection and restoration services for each person, who in the City's sole discretion, could be impacted by identity theft.
23. Consultant may not advertise that City is a client, list City as a reference or otherwise use City's name, logos, trademarks, or service marks without prior written permission from City.
24. Consultant acknowledges that services rendered under this agreement (including but not limited to service levels and operational levels) shall be performed in accordance with industry standards.
25. If the project referenced on this agreement is a Public Works project, then the following shall apply: No contractor or subcontractor may work on a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5. During the performance of this agreement, Contractor and its subcontractors shall have a continuing legal obligation to maintain current registration with the Department of Industrial Relations.
Contractor is hereby notified that this project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.
26. If the project referenced on this agreement is a Public Works project, then the following shall apply: Contractor must submit all claims as defined in and in accordance with the claim resolution process set forth in Section 9204 of the Public Contract Code. Each such claim must be sent to the City by registered mail or certified mail with return receipt requested and must contain reasonable documentation to support the claim. All claims must be received prior to acceptance of the work.
27. Contractor/consultant's duties and services under this agreement shall not include preparing or assisting the public entity with any portion of the public entity's preparation of a request for proposals, request for qualifications, or any other solicitation regarding a subsequent or additional contract with the public entity. The public entity entering this agreement shall at all times retain responsibility for public contracting, including with respect to any subsequent phase of this project. Contractor/consultant's participation in the planning, discussions, or drawing of project plans or specifications, if any, shall be limited to conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications. Contractor/consultant shall cooperate with the public entity to ensure that all bidders for a subsequent contract on any subsequent phase of this project have access to the same information, including all conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications prepared by contractor pursuant to this agreement.
28. Consultant certifies that Consultant, its employees, directors, officers, agents, subcontractors, vendors, and volunteers are not presently debarred, excluded, suspended, declared ineligible, voluntarily excluded, or proposed for debarment, exclusion, suspension, or ineligibility by 6 Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
Contract Purchase Agreement 3005332
any federal, state, or local department or agency.
29. The Levine Act (Govt. Code, Section 84308) requires a Party (and its agent(s), if any) to a Proceeding before the City of Roseville that involves any action or consideration related to their contract, license, permit, or other entitlement for use, to disclose any campaign contributions made to City elected or appointed officers totaling more than $500 within the twelve (12) months prior to the City decision and while a proceeding is pending, and includes certain prohibitions on contribution activity thereafter. If applicable campaign contributions have been made by Contractor and/or its agent(s), Contractor is responsible for compliance, including for its disclosure obligations, if any, as further described at: https://www.roseville. ca.us/government/departments/city_clerk/transparency/levine_act.
30. This Agreement may be amended via change order, but only if such change order is made in writing, approved by the City, and signed by both parties.
31. CONSULTANT agrees to defend and indemnify CITY if, despite the parties intent and practice, any venue, agency, or court with competent jurisdiction determines that CONSULTANT and/or any of its agents, officers, employees, volunteers, independent contractors, or subcontractors, are characterized as employee(s) of CITY.
CONSULTANT and CITY agree that: (a) CONSULTANT is free from the control and direction of CITY in connection with the performance of the work; (b) CONSULTANT is providing services directly to CITY; (c) CONSULTANT has and will maintain at all relevant times a business license; (d) CONSULTANT maintains a business location that is separate from CITY; (e) CONSULTANT is customarily engaged in an independently established business of the same nature as that involved in the work performed hereunder; (f) CONSULTANT actually contracts with other businesses to provide the same or similar services and maintains a clientele without restrictions from CITY; (g) CONSULTANT advertises and holds itself out to the public as available to provide the same or similar services; (h) CONSULTANT provides its own tools, vehicles, and equipment to perform the services; (i) CONSULTANT has negotiated its own rates; (j) CONSULTANT set its own hours and location of work in accomplishing CITY's on-call needs; and (k) CONSULTANT has the right to control the manner and means of accomplishing the result desired and exercises its own expert independent judgement.
32. If Consultant produces any "web content" pursuant to this Agreement, as that term is defined in section 35.104 of Title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as may be amended, Consultant shall ensure that any such web content is in full compliance with all applicable requirements of the most current version of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, the Americans with Disabilities Act, Code of Federal Regulations and/or California law.
Consultant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless City, its officers, employees, and agents from and against any and all claims, liabilities, damages, or expenses arising out of Consultant's failure to comply with such requirements. This provision shall survive expiration and/or termination of this Agreement.
The supplier named hereon by the acceptance of this order agrees to the provisions of this document titled "Contract Purchase Agreement" and all accompanying terms, conditions, and attachments.
Roseville Business License No. ____________________________________ Contractor License No. ____________________________________________ DIR Registration No. _______________________________________________ Check mark the applicable company type below:
7 Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335 TBD
Contract Purchase Agreement 3005332
___________ Corporation
_____X______ Limited Liability Company
___________ Partnership
___________ Sole Proprietor
City reserves the right to withhold any payments to Consultant in the event of noncompliance with insurance requirements or if required by law.
Information Technology T&C
REV 3/16/26 MC
8 Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
Contract Purchase Agreement 3005332
ATTACHMENT A
HUMAN RESOURCES/RISK MANAGEMENT DIVISION
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
AGREEMENT OVER FORMAL BID LIMIT OR INVOLVING HIGH RISK ACTIVITIES General - Required Coverage/Documentation
● General Liability: $1 Million per occurrence /$2 Million aggregate ● Automobile Liability: $1 Million combined single limit ● Workers' Compensation: Statutory *Must provide a Waiver of subrogation ● Additional Insured Endorsement (AIE) - General Liability policy: CG 20 38 04 13 or an equivalent, blanket endorsement or section of the policy. Endorsement shall cover the City of Roseville, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers as additional insured. ● Policies must be primary and non-contributory
● A 30 day notice of cancellation must be provided
● List certificate holder as: The City of Roseville - Insurance Compliance, PO Box 100085-R1, Duluth, GA 30096
Additional Liability/Insurance Requirements if required by Agreement (and marked below):
Construction:____
General Liability:
$2 Million/occurrence
$4 Million aggregate
Design Professional:____
General Liability:
$2 Million/occurrence
$4 Million aggregate
Professional Liability:
$2 Million/occurrence
Professional Consultant:____
Professional Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
IT Services:_X___
Professional Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
No auto required
Cyber Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
Hazardous Materials:____
Pollution Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
Special Events/Caterers-Vendors:____
No auto required
No workers' comp required
Professional Counseling/ Psychological:____
Professional Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
No auto required
9 Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
Contract Purchase Agreement 3005332
Pyrotechnics:____
General Liability:
$5 Million/occurrence
$10 Million aggregate
Auto - $2 Million/occurrence
Chemical/Environmental:____
General Liability:
$3 Million/occurrence
$6 Million aggregate
Pollution – $2 Million/Occurrence
Auto - $2 Million/Occurrence
Insurance Submission Process
The City of Roseville Human Resources/Risk Management Department uses a service called EBIX to manage our insurance certificate tracking.
How It Works
● The vendor's contact information is entered into EBIX. EBIX will contact the vendor to request proof of insurance.
● The Vendor can forward the request to their Insurance Agent(s) if necessary. ● Vendor/Insurance Agent submits insurance to EBIX by email to [email protected] or by fax to (770) 325-5727. After faxing or emailing the certificate, please DO NOT send the certificate by mail to EBIX. Please do not mail, email or fax any certificates to the City of Roseville. ● Once submitted, EBIX reviews the insurance documentation. If there are deficiencies, EBIX will send a follow up letter or email requesting additional information.
Questions Regarding Insurance Submission: Contact EBIX at (951) 652-4239 Questions Regarding Insurance Requirements Contact Risk Management at (916) 774-5202 10 Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
Contract Purchase Agreement 3005332
Supplier
Signature:______________________________________________ Print Name:_____________________________________________ Title:__________________________________________________ Date: __________________________________________________ Supplier
Signature:______________________________________________ Print Name:_____________________________________________ Title:__________________________________________________ Date: __________________________________________________ City of Roseville, A Municipal Corporation
Signature:______________________________________________ Print Name: Dominick Casey
Title: City Manager
Date:__________________________________________________ 11 Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335 Director of Contracts
Denise Cole
4/16/2026
!"#$%$$
&'()*+,-./,*-.+01-.+,22)*3456.+/276,8'/*+*36/9.+/,6*+:;34*:206+ &2:4*+:2,*&<::6.=:>/,6*+:[email protected]+2
ABC DBEFG H
IEJC KLM#$%$$#NGOB EG NCO!EPBQRGS!RRTBFUVBKTW!OBI FB PXYX$$ZUI[ B\C F!E\RCEKW!GER!E BR GERBWG]TRR!CEC\\ BRR!GE!E^_ C!EB`aLBUI!R"GKCWBFCW LWW RHbbQQQ`\GO`KC`\GObQ XKGEWBEWbT "GCFRb$%$$b%cbc`M`$$X]TRR!CX^_ C!EBXUVBKTW!OBX I FB ` Fd`
aLBUIF! BKWRC""C\BEK!BRCEFFB C WSBEWRWLCWC BRTefBKWWGWLBNGOB EG gRCTWLG !Wh WGWC_BKB WC!E!SSBF!CWBRWB R#!EK"TF!E\EGW!dh!E\C""KGEW CKWG RCEF\ CEWBBRGdWLB! Ge"!\CW!GERWGKGS "hQ!WLBV!RW!E\BKGEGS!KRCEKW!GER!S GRBFehWLB^`i`\GOB ESBEW!E BR GERBWG]TRR!CjRCKW!GER!E^_ C!EB#CRQB""CRCEhRCEKW!GER!S GRBFTEFB RWCWB "CQ`
aL!RKG BR GEFBEKBRB OBRCRCEGW!KBTEFB WLBUIWLCWCRCKGEW CKWG G \ CEWBB# KGS "!CEKBQ!WLWLBBKGEGS!KRCEKW!GER!S GRBF!E BR GERBWG]TRR!CgRCKW!GER!E ^_ C!EB!R BkT! BF#!EK"TF!E\Q!WL BR BKWWG#eTWEGW"!S!WBFWG#WLBdBFB C"BVBKTW!OB G FB R!FBEW!d!BF!EWLBUICEFWLBRCEKW!GER!FBEW!d!BFGEWLB^`i`AB C WSBEWGdWLB a BCRT hQBeR!WBZLWW RHbbLGSB`W BCRT h`\GOb G"!KhX!RRTBRbd!ECEK!C"XRCEKW!GERbRCEKW!GERX G\ CSRXCEFXKGTEW hX!EdG SCW!GEbT_ C!EBX TRR!CX B"CWBFXRCEKW!GER[`lC!"T BWGKGS "h SCh BRT"W!EWLBWB S!ECW!GEGdKGEW CKWRG \ CEWR#CRC "!KCe"B`
m"BCRBEGWBWLCWdG CEhC\ BBSBEWRG \ CEWROC"TBFCWnoS!""!GEG SG BhGTSTRW B G WWGWLBp!WhGd]GRBO!""BhGT KGS "!CEKBQ!WLBKGEGS!KRCEKW!GER!EK"TF!E\RWB R hGTLCOBWC_BE!E BR GERBWG]TRR!CjRCKW!GER!E^_ C!EB#!EK"TF!E\#eTWEGW"!S!WBFWG# FBR!RW!E\d GSSC_!E\EBQ!EOBRWSBEWR!E#G BE\C\!E\!Ed!ECEK!C"W CERCKW!GERQ!WL# ]TRR!CEBEW!W!BR#EGWW CERdB !E\WBKLEG"G\hWG]TRR!CG ]TRR!CEBEW!W!BR#CEFF! BKW"h GO!F!E\RT G WWGWLB\GOB ESBEWCEF BG "BGd^_ C!EB`
i!EKB B"h#
Mb$ob$%$$
iLCEEGEq!BRW
p!WhGd]GRBO!""B
mT KLCR!E\CEFqC BLGTRBJCEC\B
Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
i
SUBMITTED BY:
BreakPoint Labs, LLC
8116 Arlington Blvd, #255
Falls Church, VA 22042
Denise Cole
Director of Contracts
(703) 495-3559
SUBMITTED TO:
City of Roseville
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678
Attn: City Clerk Department
[email protected]
City of Roseville, California
Cybersecurity Pentesting Services
Request for Proposal #12-038
Submittal Date: 12 March 2026
Proposal
Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
City of Roseville, California
RFP #12-038 Cybersecurity Pentesting Services
ii
March 12, 2026
City of Roseville via email: [email protected] Attn: City Clerk Department
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678
Subject: RFP Number 12-038
Cybersecurity Pentesting Services
To whom it may concern,
BreakPoint Labs is pleased to submit the following response to the City of Roseville, California RFP Reference Number #12-038 for Cybersecurity Penetration Testing Services.
This proposal consists of the following documents: this Proposal, Tab B and E document, Appendix A – Resumes, and Appendix B– Required Forms.
Company Name: BreakPoint Labs, LLC
Company Address: 8116 Arlington Blvd., #255
Falls Church, VA 22042
Authorized Point of Contact: Denise Cole
Contracts Administrator
[email protected]
(703) 495-3559
DUNS Number: 079914189
UEI Number: WAU7C2EAKGN9
CAGE Code: 7FZP3
This proposal has a validity period of ninety (90) calendar days from the date of submission.
Should you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact Denise Cole at (703) 495-3559 or via email at [email protected].
Respectfully,
Andrew S. McNicol
Chief Technology Officer
Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
City of Roseville, California
RFP #12-038 Cybersecurity Pentesting Services
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TAB A: FIRM’S QUALIFICATIONS........................................................................................ 1 A.1 COMPANY OVERVIEW ................................................................................................. 1 A.2 QUALIFICATIONS FOR REQUESTED SERVICES................................................... 1 A.3 SERVICES PERFORMED BY BREAKPOINT LABS STAFF..................................... 2 A.4 ORGANIZATIONAL CHART......................................................................................... 2 A.5 STAFFING LEVEL HISTORY (PAST FIVE YEARS).................................................. 2 TAB B: EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES........................................................................... 3 B.1 EXPERIENCE SUMMARY.............................................................................................. 3 B.2 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................... 3 TAB C: QUALIFICATIONS OF TEAM ................................................................................... 3 C.1 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION ........................................................................................... 3 C.2 PROJECT TEAM ORGANIZATION DIAGRAM......................................................... 3 C.3 DESIGNATED PROJECT MANAGERS........................................................................ 4 C.3.1 ANDREW S. MCNICOL (CO)............................................................................................... 4 C.3.2 ZACHARY MEYERS (MD)................................................................................................... 4 C.3.3 RAY BLASKO (AZ)............................................................................................................. 4 C.3.4 ALEXANDRA FOX (ME)...................................................................................................... 5 C.4 DESIGNATED TECHNICAL .......................................................................................... 5 C.4.1 ERIC GARCIA (TN)............................................................................................................. 5 C.4.2 TREVOR ISENBERG (TN)..................................................................................................... 6 C.4.3 MATTHEW MURRAY (MD)................................................................................................. 6 C.5 TEAM CERTIFICATIONS .............................................................................................. 7 TAB D: PROJECT UNDERSTANDING................................................................................... 7 D.1 UNDERSTANDING OF REQUESTED SERVICES...................................................... 7 D.2 GENERAL METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................ 8 D.3 MAJOR CHALLENGES AND CONSIDERATIONS.................................................... 9 D.3.1 OT TESTING SENSITIVITY .................................................................................................. 9 D.3.2 COORDINATING AROUND 24/7 PUBLIC SAFETY OPERATIONS ............................................ 9 D.3.3 MULTI-YEAR ENGAGEMENT CONTINUITY AND EVOLUTION .............................................. 9 D.3.4 SOCIAL ENGINEERING WITH DEEP FAKES......................................................................... 10 D.4 UNIQUE APPROACHES AND STRENGTHS............................................................. 10 TAB E: PROJECT PLAN.......................................................................................................... 10 E.1 PROPOSED WORK SCHEDULE.................................................................................. 10 E.2 EQUIPMENT, TOOLS, AND INFRASTRUCTURE ................................................... 11 E.3 DATA HANDLING, STORAGE, AND DESTRUCTION............................................ 11 TAB F: COST PROPOSAL....................................................................................................... 11 F.1 REQUIRED SERVICES COST ...................................................................................... 12 F.2 OPTIONAL SERVICES COST ...................................................................................... 12 Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
City of Roseville, California
RFP #12-038 Cybersecurity Pentesting Services
iv
TAB G: REQUIRED STATEMENTS/DOCUMENTS........................................................... 12 G.1 STATEMENT 1: TEAM NON-SUBSTITUTION........................................................ 12 G.2 STATEMENT 2: ABSENCE OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST................................... 13 G.3 STATEMENT 3: INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE ..................................... 13 G.4 STATEMENT 4: NON-PROPRIETARY...................................................................... 13 G.5 REQUIRED FORMS AND DOCUMENTS................................................................... 13 TAB H: EXCEPTIONS.............................................................................................................. 13 TAB I: COMPETENCY OF PROPOSERS............................................................................. 13 I.1 LEGAL AND FINANCIAL HISTORY........................................................................... 13 I.2 FINANCIAL RESOURCES ............................................................................................. 13 TAB J: TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS...................................................................................... 14 J.1 SUPPORT DURING ENGAGEMENTS......................................................................... 14 J.2 ESCALATION FOR CRITICAL FINDINGS................................................................ 14 J.3 SUPPORT AFTER ENGAGEMENTS ........................................................................... 14 J.4 TERMS AND CONDITIONS .......................................................................................... 14 J.5 SAMPLE REPORTS ........................................................................................................ 15 APPENDIX A – RESUMES....................................................................................................... 15 APPENDIX A.1 ANDREW S. MCNICOL........................................................................................ 15 APPENDIX A.2 ZACHARY MEYERS............................................................................................. 17 APPENDIX A.3 RAY BLASKO...................................................................................................... 19 APPENDIX A.4 ALEXANDRIA FOX.............................................................................................. 20 APPENDIX A.5 ERIC GARCIA...................................................................................................... 21 APPENDIX A.6 TREVOR ISENBERG ............................................................................................. 23 APPENDIX A.7 MATHEW MURRAY ............................................................................................ 24 APPENDIX B – REQUIRED FORMS ..................................................................................... 26 APPENDIX C – PROOF OF INSURANCE............................................................................. 27
TABLE OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1 - BREAKPOINT LABS ORGANIZATIONAL CHART............................................................... 2 FIGURE 2 - BREAKPOINT LABS PROPOSED PERSONNEL DIAGRAM................................................... 3 FIGURE 3 - PENETRATION TESTING ENGAGEMENT FLOW................................................................. 9 Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
City of Roseville, California
RFP #12-038 Cybersecurity Pentesting Services
1 TAB A: FIRM’S QUALIFICATIONS
A.1 COMPANY OVERVIEW
BreakPoint Labs, LLC (BPL) is a certified small business headquartered in Falls Church, Virginia, specializing in offensive cybersecurity services. BPL has delivered cybersecurity assessment services, including penetration testing, red team operations, vulnerability assessments, and security audits, for more than ten (10) years across municipal government, federal government, Department of Defense, academic, and private-sector clients.
BPL maintains an approximately 65-person workforce, with 95% or more holding active DoD security clearances, 75% holding active Top Secret (SCI eligible) clearances, and over 50% holding active TS/SCI clearances. BPL holds an active DCSA-authorized Facility Clearance (FCL) at the Top Secret level.
BPL currently operates a DoD Cyber Red Team (DCRT) tasked with conducting penetration testing and red team engagements of critical infrastructures in coordination with U.S. Cyber Command (USCYBERCOM) and the National Security Agency (NSA). BPL operators conduct specialized offensive security assessments of both IT and operational technology (OT) assets supporting critical infrastructure on the DoD Information Network (DODIN), utilizing adversarial tactics, techniques, and procedures to identify cyber vulnerabilities in systems and the networks that support them.
BPL holds the following corporate certifications and quality designations:
Certification Status
CMMI-Services Level 4 (Program Management / Service Delivery) Active ISO 9001:2015 (Quality Management) Active
ISO 27001:2022 (Information Security) Active
CMMC Level 2 C3PAO Assessment Completed
Great Place To Work™ Certified 20256
DCSA Facility Clearance — Top Secret Active
A.2 QUALIFICATIONS FOR REQUESTED SERVICES
BPL's qualifications for the City of Roseville's cybersecurity penetration testing services are grounded in the following:
Methodology Alignment. BPL utilizes established penetration testing methodologies aligned with NIST SP 800-115, the OWASP Testing Guide, the Penetration Testing Execution Standard (PTES), NIST 800-53, and the MITRE ATT&CK Framework.
IT and OT Expertise. BPL has developed and maintains an IT/OT penetration testing methodology that incorporates risk scoring, tradecraft, and dependencies. This methodology follows industry best standards in planning, execution, and post-implementation while operating safely within OT and other sensitive environments. BPL regularly performs specialized penetration testing of production OT environments for municipal clients, military, and healthcare without negative impact on operations. Several of the proposed personnel are currently or have previously been members of the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) DoD Red Team tasked specifically with assessing and securing ICS/SCADA environments essential to the security of the nation.
Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
City of Roseville, California
RFP #12-038 Cybersecurity Pentesting Services
2 Municipal Government Experience. BPL has direct experience providing cybersecurity assessment services to local and county governments, as shown by our provided references. The penetration testing services provided to these customers include external, internal, web application, SCADA/ICS OT, physical, wireless, cloud, supply chain, purple team engagements, and social engineering exercises.
Credentialed Workforce. BPL personnel hold advanced degrees and industry-recognized certifications including CISSP, OSCP, OSCE, GICSP, GPEN, GWAPT, GCIH, PMP, CEH, and numerous others.
A.3 SERVICES PERFORMED BY BREAKPOINT LABS STAFF
All services described in this proposal will be performed by BPL employees. BPL does not require the use of sub-contractors or third parties and will accomplish all penetration testing services using BPL personnel. 100% of proposed personnel are current US-based BPL employees and available immediately upon contract award.
A.4 ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
Figure 1 - BreakPoint Labs Organizational Chart
A.5 STAFFING LEVEL HISTORY (PAST FIVE YEARS)
BPL has an exceptional history of employee and contract retention. BPL staffing levels have remained consistent above 50 full-time employees for the last 5 years and are currently around 65 at the time of this response. Further details can be provided upon request.
Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
City of Roseville, California
RFP #12-038 Cybersecurity Pentesting Services
3 TAB B: EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES
B.1 EXPERIENCE SUMMARY
BreakPoint Labs (BPL) has more than ten (10) years of experience delivering cybersecurity assessment services including penetration testing, red team operations, vulnerability assessments, and security audits. BPL's client base spans municipal and county governments, federal agencies, the Department of Defense, academic institutions, and private-sector organizations.
BPL's municipal and county government penetration testing experience is directly relevant to the City of Roseville's requirements. These engagements have encompassed the same categories of testing services identified in this RFP, including external and internal network penetration testing, web application testing, wireless assessments, cloud testing, physical security, ICS/SCADA OT engagements, configuration validation, and more, customized to each customer’s needs.
B.2 REFERENCES
Our full references, including points of contact, are in the Tab B and E attachment.
TAB C: QUALIFICATIONS OF TEAM
C.1 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
Headquarters:
BreakPoint Labs, LLC
8116 Arlington Blvd., #255
Falls Church, VA 22042
All proposed personnel are US citizens and operate remotely from within the United States with the ability to deploy onsite to client locations as required. For each personnel listed, the state location is noted. BPL does not require the use of any subcontractors or third parties for the services described in this RFP.
C.2 PROJECT TEAM ORGANIZATION DIAGRAM
Figure 2 - BreakPoint Labs Proposed Personnel Diagram
Full resumes for all proposed personnel are located in Appendix A.
Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
City of Roseville, California
RFP #12-038 Cybersecurity Pentesting Services
7 C.5 TEAM CERTIFICATIONS
TAB D: PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
D.1 UNDERSTANDING OF REQUESTED SERVICES
The City of Roseville seeks a qualified cybersecurity consultant to perform comprehensive penetration testing services across its Information Technology (IT), Business Technology (BT), and Operational Technology (OT) environments. The engagement is structured as a multi-year contract — three (3) years with one (1) optional renewal year — with annual penetration testing engagements of approximately one to two weeks of active testing each .
The City's technology environment supports critical municipal functions including public safety (police and fire), utilities (electric, water, wastewater), and general administrative services. These systems operate under multiple regulatory frameworks, including:
● CJIS Security Policy — governing criminal justice information systems used by public safety departments
● PCI-DSS — governing payment card processing systems
● NIST SP 800-82 — guiding the security of industrial control systems Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
City of Roseville, California
RFP #12-038 Cybersecurity Pentesting Services
8 ● IEC 62443 — addressing industrial automation and control systems security ● NERC CIP — governing critical infrastructure protection for electric utility systems The RFP specifies eight (8) required testing service categories: external network penetration testing, internal network penetration testing, web application penetration testing, wireless network penetration testing, cloud infrastructure testing, social engineering testing (as authorized by the City), configuration and security control validation, and SCADA/ICS testing. Additionally, the City may request optional/specialized services during the contract term, including mobile application testing, API security testing, MDM/endpoint testing, IoT/embedded device testing, physical security testing, third-party/supply chain assessments, red/blue/purple team engagements, and insider threat simulation. BPL and its personnel have the experience and credentials necessary to support all of these testing services.
D.2 GENERAL METHODOLOGY
BPL's approach to the City of Roseville engagement follows a structured, phased methodology aligned with industry standards including MITRE ATT&CK Framework, NIST SP 800-115, the OWASP Testing Guide, and the Penetration Testing Execution Standard (PTES). BPL has over 10 years of experience conducting penetration testing using this methodology blended with practical lessons learned from hundreds of engagements across municipal government, federal, DoD, academic, and commercial clients.
Each engagement will proceed through the following phases, which are further explained within Tab E:
1. Planning and Scoping — Kick-off meeting with City staff to review objectives, define scope, establish Rules of Engagement (ROE), confirm testing windows, and identify blacklisted/sensitive systems. Scope will be finalized in coordination with City IT and department stakeholders. Specific test cases, areas of concern, and other considerations are discussed to further customize the project execution to the City’s needs.
2. Reconnaissance and Enumeration — Systematic identification of the City's attack surface using both passive and active techniques. External reconnaissance leverages OSINT tools (Shodan, Censys.io, DNS enumeration, search engine analysis) to map the external footprint. Internal reconnaissance maps network topology, Active Directory domains, services, and segmentation.
3. Active Testing — Combined automated and manual testing. Automated tools provide a preliminary evaluation; manual testing goes beyond scanner output to identify vulnerabilities commonly missed by automated means. BPL conducts targeted, in-depth testing to validate exploitability and clearly distinguish between theoretical and demonstrated risks.
4. Exploitation and Post-Exploitation — With City authorization and within the approved ROE, BPL validates vulnerabilities through controlled exploitation to demonstrate actual impact. Post-exploitation activities assess the extent of potential compromise, lateral movement paths, and privilege escalation opportunities. All exploitation follows two-person integrity (TPI) checks and continuous communication with City stakeholders.
5. Analysis and Reporting — Reporting will include an Executive Report with testing summaries and high-level takeaways, as well as a more detailed Technical Report with finding details. Each finding include a description of the finding, an attacker/exploitation scenario detailing how exploitation was or could be carried out and the resulting impact, and Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
City of Roseville, California
RFP #12-038 Cybersecurity Pentesting Services
9 full remediation steps and options to assist the City in mitigating the finding. All findings rated using CVSS v3.1 scoring and mapped to CIS Controls and NIST CSF. Outbriefs to both management and technical levels can be supported. Final reports are delivered within 2 weeks of the end of active testing.
6. Retesting and Validation — BPL stands behind its work by providing remote remediation services at no charge for all customers. At any point after testing, BPL operators can retest any reported findings to ensure the effectiveness of mitigations.
Figure 3 - Penetration Testing Engagement Flow
D.3 MAJOR CHALLENGES AND CONSIDERATIONS
D.3.1 OT Testing Sensitivity
Testing production OT environments requires extreme care to avoid operational disruption. BPL addresses this through a "low-and-slow" methodology that prioritizes manual enumeration over aggressive automated scanning. BPL regularly performs specialized penetration testing of production OT environments for municipal clients, military, and healthcare without negative impact on operations. Several of the proposed personnel are currently or have previously been members of the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) DoD Red Team tasked specifically with assessing and securing ICS/SCADA environments essential to the security of the nation. BPL offensive security testing has never negatively affected operations on production environments.
D.3.2 Coordinating Around 24/7 Public Safety Operations Public safety systems supporting police and fire operations cannot tolerate downtime. Testing of CJIS-protected systems and public safety networks requires careful scheduling around operational windows, advance notice of all testing activities, and immediate escalation protocols for any critical findings. BPL will coordinate testing schedules with the City to avoid operational disruption, provide advance notice of testing windows, and immediately notify the City of any critical or high-risk findings discovered during testing.
D.3.3 Multi-Year Engagement Continuity and Evolution
A three-year engagement requires consistent methodology, staffing, and institutional knowledge across assessment cycles. BPL thrives on continuity and has an exceptional track record of both employee and customer retention. BPL personnel also continuously keep methodologies and TTPs up-to-date and relevant to today’s threat landscape. Year-over-year continuity allows BPL to track Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
City of Roseville, California
RFP #12-038 Cybersecurity Pentesting Services
10 remediation progress, identify recurring vulnerabilities, rapidly adjust methodologies to meet emerging threats, and adapt testing focus areas based on the City's evolving risk profile.
D.3.4 Social Engineering with Deep Fakes
The RFP identifies social engineering testing, including deep fakes, as a testing category available only if explicitly authorized by the City. Social engineering requires special care in tailoring to the City’s needs and truly emulating real threats that may target the City of Roseville. BPL has extensive social engineering testing capabilities using a variety of communication methods and attack paths, including deep fake generation, and knows how to design and execute customized social engineering campaigns that drive real awareness and defensive improvement.
D.4 UNIQUE APPROACHES AND STRENGTHS
TS/SCI Cleared Workforce. BPL maintains an active DCSA-authorized Facility Clearance at the Top Secret level, with 75% of personnel holding active Top Secret (SCI eligible) clearances and over 50% holding TS/SCI. This clearance profile provides assurance of personnel trustworthiness and the ability to handle sensitive municipal data with the highest standards of care.
Municipal Government Track Record. BPL has direct penetration testing experience with multiple municipal and county governments. These engagements have encompassed the full range of testing services requested in this RFP, including ICS/SCADA assessments of public safety organizations and public utility infrastructure.
Manual Testing Emphasis. BPL's approach prioritizes manual testing techniques over reliance on automated scanners. This approach has consistently identified critical vulnerabilities missed by prior third-party assessments at other organizations, including previously undiscovered Active Directory escalation paths, custom remote code execution vulnerabilities, and SMTP injection flaws.
OT Experience and GICSP-Certified Team Members. BPL has 10 years of experience in highprofile OT security assessments and employs personnel holding the GIAC Industrial Cyber Security Professional (GICSP) certification — a concentration of ICS/OT expertise directly applicable to the City's SCADA testing requirements. This depth of ICS-certified personnel ensures that OT assessments are conducted by qualified specialists who understand both the technical and operational implications of testing industrial control systems.
No Subcontractors. All services will be performed by BPL employees. 100% of proposed personnel are long-term BPL employees available immediately upon contract award.
TAB E: PROJECT PLAN
Our full, detailed project plan, including considerations and methodologies, is located in the Tab B and E attachment document.
E.1 PROPOSED WORK SCHEDULE
BPL proposes the following schedule for each engagement:
Phase Duration Activities
Week 1 Planning & Preparation Kick-off meeting, scope confirmation, ROE Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
City of Roseville, California
RFP #12-038 Cybersecurity Pentesting Services
11 finalization, access provisioning
Weeks 2–3 Active Testing Active testing of the services scoped for the assessment
Week 4-5 Reporting & Delivery Report compilation and delivery, debriefs, remediation planning
Post-Delivery Remediation Testing Validation of remediated vulnerabilities upon City request
Personnel assigned for each engagement will match the service areas under test, and will come from the proposed team members within this response. No substitutions will be made without the prior written approval of the City, as required.
E.2 EQUIPMENT, TOOLS, AND INFRASTRUCTURE
All equipment and tools are provided and managed by BPL. No City equipment is required beyond standard network/VPN access and provisioned user accounts for gray-box testing.
E.3 DATA HANDLING, STORAGE, AND DESTRUCTION
All data collected, generated, or derived during the engagement — including scan results, screenshots, logs, credentials, configurations, exploit artifacts, and reports — will be handled as confidential City information.
Storage:
● Encryption at rest: AES-256 or stronger
● Encryption in transit: TLS 1.2 or higher
● Access restricted to authorized BPL engagement personnel only ● All City data stored on servers located within the continental United States ● No City data transferred outside approved jurisdictions without prior written City authorization
● No reuse of City data for testing, training, marketing, or demonstration purposes Destruction:
● All City data, including backups and archival copies, permanently destroyed or securely deleted upon engagement completion
● Written attestation of data destruction provided upon City request ● No copies retained beyond agreed retention period unless explicitly authorized in writing by the City
TAB F: COST PROPOSAL
Pricing has been estimated based on known scoping details but will need to be adjusted to fit each engagement’s specific scope. For each engagement, BPL will provide a firm fixed price after scoping discussions with the City, and is open to negotiation to meet the City’s needs while still providing a high-quality service.
When multiple services are covered during the same assessment, there will be efficiencies across them that will reduce total price. For example, doing cloud and external services during the same engagement can use combined reconnaissance efforts and will have reduced overhead during the reporting phase.
Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
City of Roseville, California
RFP #12-038 Cybersecurity Pentesting Services
12 As scope has been estimated based on past work with cities of similar size to Roseville, this pricing will vary based on actual scope under test and desired outcomes. BPL has an extensive history of working closely with customers in the preparation phase to ensure each engagement is tailored to the customer’s specific needs, including costs.
F.1 REQUIRED SERVICES COST
Service Area Estimated Price Hourly Rate
External $19,200 $160
Internal $32,000 $160
Web Application (broad, 300-400 apps) $19,200 $160
Web Application (single, deep dive) $6,400 $160
Wireless (on-site required) $6,400 $160
Cloud $19,200 $160
Social Engineering $12,800 $160
Configuration and Security Control
Validation $28,800 $160
ICS/SCADA (on-site required) $36,000 $180
Remediation Testing (all remote services) Free Free
Travel (on-site services only) $1,700 / person / week - F.2 OPTIONAL SERVICES COST
Service Area Estimated Price Hourly Rate
Mobile App (single app) $6,400 $160
API Testing (single API) $6,400 $160
Mobile Device Management and Endpoint
Security Testing $10,800 $180
IoT $10,800 $180
Physical $9,600 $160
Supply Chain $12,800 $160
Purple Team (Internal scope) $36,000 $180
Insider Threat Simulation $6,400 $160
TAB G: REQUIRED STATEMENTS/DOCUMENTS
G.1 STATEMENT 1: TEAM NON-SUBSTITUTION
BreakPoint Labs assures the City of Roseville that the designated project team identified in this proposal will be used for this project. BPL will not make any departure, reassignment, or substitution of any member of the designated project team without the prior written approval of the City, in accordance with Section 4.0 of the RFP. BPL does not propose any sub-consultants or sub-contractors for this engagement; all services will be performed by BPL employees.
Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
City of Roseville, California
RFP #12-038 Cybersecurity Pentesting Services
13 G.2 STATEMENT 2: ABSENCE OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST
BreakPoint Labs affirms that no conflict of interest exists with respect to this proposal or the performance of the services described herein, in accordance with Section 10.4 of the RFP. BPL has no financial, contractual, organizational, or other relationships that would create a conflict of interest or appearance of a conflict of interest with the City of Roseville or any party to this procurement.
G.3 STATEMENT 3: INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE
BreakPoint Labs affirms its ability and agreement to fulfill the indemnification and insurance requirements contained in the Sample Contract (Attachment A), Section 10.7. BPL maintains network security and privacy insurance coverage that meets or exceeds standard industry limits, including cyber liability coverage. BPL is prepared to provide certificates of insurance upon contract award demonstrating compliance with the City's insurance requirements, including Professional Liability and Cyber Liability coverage at $2,000,000 per occurrence as specified for IT Services engagements.
G.4 STATEMENT 4: NON-PROPRIETARY
BreakPoint Labs affirms that nothing contained in this submitted proposal is proprietary, in accordance with Section 10.23 of the RFP.
G.5 REQUIRED FORMS AND DOCUMENTS
Provided with this response is Appendix C which contains the following requested documents:
● Screenshot of Active State of California Business Registration ● Executed copy of Proposer’s Certification (Attachment B) ● Levine Act Disclosure Statement Form (Attachment C)
● Executed copy of Non-collusion Declaration (Attachment D) TAB H: EXCEPTIONS
BreakPoint Labs takes no exceptions to the Scope of Services, requirements of this RFP, or the Sample Contract (Attachment A). BPL agrees to all terms and conditions as stated.
TAB I: COMPETENCY OF PROPOSERS
I.1 LEGAL AND FINANCIAL HISTORY
BreakPoint Labs has no pending or resolved bankruptcies, liens, stop payment notices, judgments, lawsuits, arbitrations, mediations, foreclosures, or similar actions filed or resolved in the past ten (10) years. BPL's principals, directors, and employees have not been involved in any litigation, arbitration, investigations, or similar actions related to services provided.
No client has ever terminated a contract with BreakPoint Labs for breach.
BreakPoint Labs has not been debarred from providing services to any state or federal agency.
I.2 FINANCIAL RESOURCES
BreakPoint Labs is a financially stable, established cybersecurity firm with the resources to ensure continuous performance of work under this contract:
● Workforce: BPL maintains an approximately 65-person workforce, all of whom are current Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
City of Roseville, California
RFP #12-038 Cybersecurity Pentesting Services
14 BPL employees. BPL does not rely on subcontractors or third-party staffing to fulfill engagement requirements.
● Operational History: BPL has delivered cybersecurity assessment services for more than 10 years across municipal government, federal government, Department of Defense, academic, and private-sector clients, demonstrating sustained organizational capacity. ● Corporate Certifications: BPL holds CMMI-Services Level 4, ISO 9001:2015 (Quality Management), and ISO 27001:2022 (Information Security) certifications, reflecting mature organizational processes and financial investment in quality management systems. ● Federal Contract History: BPL holds active federal contracts including multi-year engagements, demonstrating financial capacity to sustain concurrent operations. ● CPARS Ratings: Exceptional Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) ratings are available from federal government clients, including Federal OIGs.
If additional financial resource validation is required, it can be discussed and provided during negotiations to sufficiently ease City concerns.
TAB J: TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS
Included in Appendix B is the completed Standards Matrix (Attachment E) as requested.
J.1 SUPPORT DURING ENGAGEMENTS
Point of Contact: The assigned project manager for each engagement will serve as the primary point of contact for the City, along with a direct backup point of contact.
Availability During Testing Windows: BPL's project manager and assigned testing team are available during all active testing windows for coordination, status updates, and escalation communications. BPL coordinates testing schedules with the City and provides advance notice of all testing activities.
Communication Channels:
● Email: Designated project team email addresses (@breakpoint-labs.com) ● Phone: Direct phone contact with the project manager
● Secure file transfer: Will be discussed with the City during engagement planning J.2 ESCALATION FOR CRITICAL FINDINGS
During active testing, any vulnerability classified as Critical or High severity will be immediately reported to the City's designated point of contact via phone and followed up with a written interim finding report within 24 hours. This ensures the City can take immediate protective action on critical vulnerabilities without waiting for the final report.
J.3 SUPPORT AFTER ENGAGEMENTS
Between annual testing cycles, BPL maintains availability to answer follow-up questions regarding findings, remediation guidance, and retesting coordination. BPL has a track record of maintaining client contact after engagement completion to provide advice and assistance.
J.4 TERMS AND CONDITIONS
BreakPoint Labs proposes no additional terms and conditions beyond those contained in the City's Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
City of Roseville, California
RFP #12-038 Cybersecurity Pentesting Services
26 APPENDIX B – REQUIRED FORMS
Please see the following pages.
Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
Attachment B
PROPOSER’S CERTIFICATION
I hereby propose to furnish the goods or services specified in the Request for Proposals (“RFP”). I agree that my proposal will remain firm for a period of up to ninety (90) days in order to allow the City of Roseville (“City”) adequate time to evaluate the qualifications submitted.
I have carefully examined the Request for Proposals and any other documents accompanying or made a part of this RFP. The information contained in this proposal is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and is signed under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California. I further certify that I am duly authorized to submit this proposal on behalf of the firm as its authorized agent and that the firm is ready, willing and able to perform if awarded the contract.
I further certify that this proposal is made without prior understanding, agreement, connection, discussion, or conspiracy with any other person, firm or corporation submitting a proposal for the same product or service; that this proposal is fair and made without outside control, collusion, fraud or illegal action; that no officer, employee or agent of the City or any other proposer is financially interested in said proposal; that no undue influence or pressure was used against or in concert with any officer, employee or agent of the City in connection with the award or terms of the contract that will be executed as a result of this RFP; and that the undersigned executed this Proposer’s Certification with full knowledge and understanding of the matters therein contained and was duly authorized to do so.
_________________________________________________
NAME OF BUSINESS
_________________________________________________
SIGNATURE
_________________________________________________
NAME & TITLE, TYPED OR PRINTED
_________________________________________________
MAILING ADDRESS
_________________________________________________
TELEPHONE NUMBER
_________________________________________________
EMAIL
Type of Organization:
____ Sole Proprietorship ____ Corporation ____ State of Incorporation ________ Partnership ____ X Limited Liability Company
BreakPoint Labs, LLC
Denise Cole, Director of Contracts
8116 Arlington Blvd. #255, Falls Church, VA 22042
(703) 495-3559
[email protected] / [email protected] Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
Attachment C
LEVINE ACT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
(The completed form submitted to the City of Roseville is a public record.) California Government Code Section 84308, commonly referred to as the "Levine Act," prohibits any “Officer” (elected or appointed officer, any alternate thereto, and any candidate for elective office) from participating in any consideration or action related to a proceeding if they receive political contribution(s) from a party, or its agent(s), totaling more than $250 within the previous twelve (12) months, while a proceeding is pending, and for twelve (12) months following the date of a final decision in a proceeding concerning a license, permit, other entitlement for use, franchise, or contract (collectively “license, permit, or contract”). For additional information:
https://www.roseville.ca.us/government/departments/city_clerk/transparency/levine_act.
City Officers are listed at the following sites:
• The Members of City Council - https://www.roseville.ca.us/government/city_council/meet_council • Boards & Commission Members - https://www.roseville.ca.us/government/boards_commissions Parties and their Agents are responsible for reviewing and disclosing their applicable contributions to City Officers on the record of a proceeding.
1. Have you or your entity, or any agent on behalf of youor your entity, made any political contribution(s) totaling more than $250 to any City Officer in the twelve (12) months preceding the date of the submission of your license, permit, or contract, or the anticipated date of any City Council, Board, or Commission consideration or action related to this license, permit, or contract? YES _____ NO _____
If yes, please identify the City Officer(s):________________________________________________________________________________
2. Do you or your entity, or any agent on behalf of you or your entity, anticipate orplan to make any political contribution(s) totaling more than $250 to any City Officer in the twelve (12) months following any City Council, Board, or Commission consideration or action related to this license, permit, or contract?
YES _____ NO _____
If yes, please identify the City Officer(s):_______________________________________________________________________________ Answering yes to either of the two questions above does not preclude the City of Roseville from considering and/or taking action on a license, permit, or contract. It does, however, potentially preclude the identified City Officers from participating in consideration of and in taking any actions related to the license, permit, or contract. Please accurately complete and sign this form, under the penalty of perjury:
____________ ___________________________________________ _______________________________________ (Date) (Printed Name/Title of Authorized Representative) (Name of business/legal entity) ___________________________________
(Signature)
You must submit a supplemental form if you make any new reportable contribution(s) while the contract, license, permit, or other entitlement is being considered. If this form has not previously been submitted in connection with a contracting, licensing, entitlement or permitting process, please provide the completed form to the Office of the City Clerk for appropriate departmental routing, at: City Clerk, 311 Vernon St., Roseville, CA 95678, [email protected] 03/11/2026 Denise Cole BreakPoint Labs, LLC
X
X
Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
LEVINE ACT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
(The completed form submitted to the City of Roseville is a public record.) Term Definition Law
Covered
"proceedings"
A proceeding to grant, deny, revoke, restrict, or modify a license, permit or other entitlement for use, that does not solely involve purely ministerial decisions and is:
(1) Applied for by the party;
(2) Formally or informally requested by the party; or
(3) A contract between the agency and the party or a
franchisee granted by the agency to the party, other than a contract that is competitively bid, a labor contract, or a personal employment contract.
FPPC Reg 18438.2(a)
Party
Any person who files an application for, or is the subject of, a proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use.
Gov. Code 84308(a)(1)
Participant
Any person who is not a party but who actively supports or opposes a particular decision in a proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use and who has a financial interest in the decision. A person actively supports or opposes a particular decision in a proceeding if that person lobbies in person the officers or employees of the agency, testifies in person before the agency, or otherwise acts to influence officers of the agency.
Gov. Code 84308(a)(2)
FPPC Reg 18438.4
Agent
A person who represents a party or participant for
compensation and appears before or otherwise communicates with the governmental agency for the purpose of influencing the pending proceeding. See FPPC Reg 18438.3 for exceptions for certain consultants.
FPPC Reg 18438.3
Competitively Bid
A contract required by law to be awarded to the lowest
responsible bidder with a responsive bid, or, if the successful bidder refuses or fails to execute the contract, to the next lowest bidder with a responsive bid.
FPPC Reg 18438.2(a)(3)(A)
Labor Contract
A contract or agreement reached through collective bargaining or with a representative group regarding the salary, benefits, or terms and conditions under an employment or retirement
policy for employees or retirees, including a project labor agreement entered under Public Contract Code Section 2500.
FPPC Reg 18438.2(a)(3)(B)
Personal Employment
Contract
A contract for employment, including the terms and conditions of employment, between the agency and an agency employee.
A contract with an independent contractor is NOT a personal employment contract.
FPPC Reg 18438.2(a)(3)(C)-
(D)
A party to a proceeding before an agency involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use shall disclose on the record of the proceeding any contribution in an amount of more than two hundred fifty dollars ($250) made within the preceding 12 months by the party or the party's agent.
Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
A party, or agent to a party, to a proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use pending before any agency or a participant, or agent to a participant, in the proceeding shall not make a contribution of more than two hundred fifty dollars ($250) to any officer of that agency during the proceeding and for 12 months following the date a final decision is rendered by the agency in the proceeding.
(Gov. Code, § 84308, emphasis added.)
Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
Attachment D
NONCOLLUSION DECLARATION TO BE EXECUTED BY
BIDDER AND SUBMITTED WITH BID
The undersigned declares:
I am the _________________ of ______________________, the party making the foregoing bid.
The bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation. The bid is genuine and not collusive or sham. The bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a false or sham bid. The bidder has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any bidder or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or to refrain from bidding. The bidder has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the bidder or any other bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other bidder. All statements contained in the bid are true. The bidder has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, to any corporation, partnership, company, association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof, to effectuate a collusive or sham bid, and has not paid, and will not pay, any person or entity for such purpose.
Any person executing this declaration on behalf of a bidder that is a corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited liability company, limited liability partnership, or any other entity, hereby represents that he or she has full power to execute, and does execute, this declaration on behalf of the bidder.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration is executed on _______________________ [date], at _____________________ [city], ________________ [state].
____________________________________
(Signature of Declarant)
11 March 2026 Falls Church
VA
Director of Contracts BreakPoint Labs, LLC
Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Any City data stored
externally will be on
US-based AWS
infrastructure only
Full compliance
Full compliance
Full compliance
OWASP Top 10 followed
Full compliance
Full compliance
Full compliance
Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Full compliance
Full compliance
Full compliance
Full compliance
Full compliance
@breakpoint-labs.com
Full compliance
Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
City of Roseville, California
RFP #12-038 Cybersecurity Pentesting Services
27 APPENDIX C – PROOF OF INSURANCE
Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
City of Roseville, California
RFP #12-038 Cybersecurity Pentesting Services
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TAB B: EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES.......................................................................................................................... 1 B.2 REFERENCES...................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 B.2.1 REFERENCE 1: COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ........................................................................................................................................... 1 B.2.2 REFERENCE 2: BROWARD COUNTY.................................................................................................................................................. 1 B.2.3 REFERENCE 3: CITY OF BRYAN......................................................................................................................................................... 1 B.2.4 REFERENCE 4: CITY OF MIDLAND .................................................................................................................................................... 2 TAB E: PROJECT PLAN.......................................................................................................................................................... 2 METHODOLOGY OVERVIEW........................................................................................................................................................................ 2 GENERAL ENGAGEMENT PHASES ............................................................................................................................................................... 3 Phase 1: Planning and Scoping............................................................................................................................................................ 3 Phase 2: Reconnaissance and Enumeration .................................................................................................................................. 3 Phase 3: Active Testing and Exploitation........................................................................................................................................ 3 Phase 4: Post-Exploitation..................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Phase 5: Reporting and Deliverables................................................................................................................................................ 4 Phase 6: Retesting and Validation...................................................................................................................................................... 4 SERVICE AREA METHODOLOGIES .............................................................................................................................................................. 4
1. External Network Penetration Testing....................................................................................................................................... 4
2. Internal Network Penetration Testing........................................................................................................................................ 5
3. Web Application Penetration Testing.......................................................................................................................................... 5
4. Wireless Network Penetration Testing ....................................................................................................................................... 5
5. Cloud Infrastructure Testing............................................................................................................................................................ 6
6. Social Engineering Testing ............................................................................................................................................................... 6
7. Configuration and Security Control Validation....................................................................................................................... 6
8. SCADA / Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Testing................................................................................................................. 7 OPTIONAL / SPECIALIZED TESTING CAPABILITIES ............................................................................................................................... 7 Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
City of Roseville, California
RFP #12-038 Cybersecurity Pentesting Services
3 procedures (TTPs) to identify vulnerabilities that automated scanners routinely miss. Automated tools provide a preliminary evaluation; manual testing cross-validates findings, eliminates false positives, and discovers vulnerabilities that require human-driven analysis to uncover — such as Active Directory misconfigurations, business logic flaws, and chained attack paths.
All testing will adhere to the following operational requirements specified in the RFP:
● Testing schedules coordinated with the City to avoid operational disruption ● Advance notice of testing windows and escalation contacts provided ● Immediate notification to the City of any critical or high-risk findings during testing ● No denial-of-service or destructive testing unless explicitly authorized in writing by the City ● All findings rated using CVSS v3.1 scoring and mapped to CIS Controls and NIST CSF ● Detailed logs of all testing activities maintained throughout each engagement The general engagement phases are provided below, as well as the specific methodologies used for each service area.
General Engagement Phases
Phase 1: Planning and Scoping
BPL will conduct a kick-off meeting with City staff to review key objectives, scheduled activities, assumptions, and constraints. During this phase:
● Scope confirmation: Define in-scope systems, IP ranges, applications, and environments for the annual engagement
● Rules of Engagement (ROE): Establish testing parameters, authorized techniques, blacklisted systems, escalation contacts, and communication protocols ● Testing windows: Coordinate schedules with City departments to minimize operational impact
● Credential provisioning: For gray-box testing components, coordinate provisioning of standard user accounts, VPN access, and application credentials as appropriate Phase 2: Reconnaissance and Enumeration
BPL operators will perform systematic identification of the City's attack surface using both passive and active techniques, tailored to each testing category within the approved scope.
External reconnaissance leverages OSINT tools (Shodan, Censys.io, Google Dorks, DNS enumeration, metadata analysis, historical archives) and compromised data repositories to map the external footprint, identify publicly accessible services, and discover potential attack paths. Any additional potential scope items discovered during reconnaissance will be sent to the City for confirmation before testing.
Internal reconnaissance maps network topology, Active Directory domains, group policies, service accounts, certificate services, trust relationships, and network segmentation. Cloud environments are enumerated from both authenticated and unauthenticated perspectives.
Phase 3: Active Testing and Exploitation
BPL will employ both automated and manual testing techniques. Manual testing goes beyond scanner output to identify vulnerabilities commonly missed by automated means.
Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
City of Roseville, California
RFP #12-038 Cybersecurity Pentesting Services
4 BPL validates exploitability of identified vulnerabilities where feasible, clearly distinguishing between theoretical and demonstrated risks as required by the RFP. All exploitation methods consider the target's criticality, process-sensitive components, and system interconnections.
Any successful exploitation resulting in a "High" or "Critical" severity vulnerability will be immediately reported to the appropriate City stakeholder(s) as an interim writeup.
Active testing for specific service areas is further detailed in the Service Area Methodologies section below.
Phase 4: Post-Exploitation
With City authorization and within the approved ROE, BPL will conduct post-exploitation testing to determine the impact and further attack paths once exploitation is achieved. Post-exploitation is conducted by senior penetration testers with two-person integrity (TPI) checks to ensure safety.
Phase 5: Reporting and Deliverables
After testing activities, BPL will compile detailed reports with the following structure:
1. Executive Report - High-level overview of assessment findings, methodology description, analytics/metrics, timeline, and observations. Tailored for City leadership and executive management stakeholders.
2. Detailed Technical Report - Comprehensive attacker narrative, methodology description, key assessment activities, and security control observations. Each finding includes:
○ Description of the finding, its severity (CVSS v3.1), systems affected, and business impact
○ Evidence of exploitation or attack scenarios with screenshots ○ Mapping to relevant compliance frameworks (CIS Controls, NIST CSF) ○ Actionable remediation recommendations with prioritization based on risk ○ External references to industry standards and frameworks Final reports will be delivered within two weeks of active testing completion. As part of the delivery process, BPL will debrief engagement results for technical and/or executive stakeholders.
Debriefs are tailored based on the target audience, focusing on risk-based objectives and creating an actionable remediation plan.
Phase 6: Retesting and Validation
Following the City's remediation efforts, BPL provides retesting services to verify that identified vulnerabilities have been effectively addressed. Retesting validates that remediation actions were successful and did not introduce new vulnerabilities. Results are documented and provided as a supplemental report.
Service Area Methodologies
1. External Network Penetration Testing
BPL will assess all in-scope internet-facing systems, services, and infrastructure. The methodology follows a phased approach:
● Reconnaissance: Enumerate external footprint using Shodan, Censys.io, Nmap, DNS Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
City of Roseville, California
RFP #12-038 Cybersecurity Pentesting Services
5 analysis, and OSINT techniques. Identify publicly accessible services, web applications, VPN endpoints, mail servers, and DNS infrastructure.
● Automated Testing: Commercial and open-source tools scan for known vulnerabilities and misconfigurations.
● Manual Testing: Targeted testing of external services including web application testing, business logic flaws, password spraying (low-and-slow within lockout thresholds), and service-specific exploitation.
● Exploitation: Validate exploitability and impact of identified vulnerabilities. If external access leads to internal network access (e.g., through VPN compromise, web application exploitation, or credential discovery), scope expansion will be coordinated with the City before proceeding.
2. Internal Network Penetration Testing
BPL will evaluate internal networks from an assumed-breach or gray-box perspective using Cityprovisioned access:
● Reconnaissance: Map network topology, enumerate Active Directory domains, identify services, assess network segmentation, and evaluate security controls. ● Active Directory Assessment: Enumerate domain trusts, group memberships, GPOs, service accounts, certificate services, and authentication mechanisms. Identify misconfigured permissions and escalation paths.
● Manual Testing: Targeted exploitation of identified vulnerabilities — credential harvesting, lateral movement via WMI/SMB/RDP, privilege escalation through AD misconfigurations, Kerberos attacks (Pass-the-Hash, Pass-the-Ticket, Kerberoasting), and certificate abuse.
● Post-Exploitation: With City authorization, demonstrate full impact of compromise through lateral movement, persistence, and data access.
3. Web Application Penetration Testing
BPL will assess web applications using a combination of automated and manual techniques aligned with the OWASP Testing Guide:
● DAST (Dynamic Application Security Testing): Automated and manual vulnerability discovery utilizing Burp Suite Professional and supplementary tools. ● Manual Testing: Request-based testing using web proxy tools to identify authentication flaws, injection vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, SSRF, command injection), business logic weaknesses, authorization bypass, and session management issues. ● Authenticated Testing: Where credentials are provided, in-depth review of postauthentication content to identify privilege escalation, insecure direct object references, and data exposure.
● All identified vulnerabilities reported against the OWASP Top 10 framework with actionable remediation recommendations.
4. Wireless Network Penetration Testing
Wireless penetration testing requires physical proximity and will be conducted onsite at City facilities:
● Wireless Discovery: Identify all wireless networks within range of City facilities, including authorized and rogue access points.
Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
City of Roseville, California
RFP #12-038 Cybersecurity Pentesting Services
6 ● Encryption Analysis: Evaluate encryption protocols (WPA2/WPA3) for weaknesses, misconfigurations, and downgrade attack susceptibility. ● Authentication Testing: Attempt to bypass wireless authentication controls, including WPA-Enterprise (802.1X/RADIUS) and captive portal implementations. ● Segmentation Validation: Verify that wireless networks are properly segmented from sensitive internal networks, OT/SCADA environments, and CJIS-protected systems.
BPL will deploy personnel onsite for the duration of the wireless assessment phase. All travel and logistics are managed by BPL.
5. Cloud Infrastructure Testing
BPL will assess cloud-hosted environments (AWS, Azure, GCP, or other platforms as applicable) from both authenticated and unauthenticated perspectives:
● Unauthenticated Assessment: Enumerate public-facing cloud resources including S3 buckets, Azure blobs, and publicly accessible API endpoints. ● Authenticated Assessment: Using provisioned credentials, evaluate IAM policies, role assignments, privilege escalation paths, network segmentation, security group configurations, and resource access controls. Assess the security of cloud projects and services as applicable.
● Cloud-to-On-Premises Pivot: Assess whether cloud access could enable lateral movement into on-premises networks or vice versa.
6. Social Engineering Testing
BPL will perform social engineering testing only upon receiving explicit written authorization from the City, with scope and boundaries clearly defined in the Rules of Engagement. BPL's social engineering capabilities include:
● Spear Phishing Campaigns: Clone targeted websites and craft phishing emails to test user security awareness. Campaigns can be customized to determine click/open rates or capture credentials via fake authentication portals, including MFA bypass considerations. ● Vishing (Voice Phishing): Telephone-based social engineering to test user compliance with security policies.
● Physical Social Engineering: Onsite pretexting, tailgating, and facility access testing. ● Deep Fakes: As noted in the RFP, deep fake social engineering will be performed only if explicitly authorized and in close collaboration with City points of contact.
Upon completion, BPL will deliver an executive summary of the approach with compiled metrics and recommendations for security awareness training.
7. Configuration and Security Control Validation
BPL will validate the effectiveness of the City's security configurations and controls through:
● Firewall and ACL Review: Validate that network access controls enforce intended segmentation and restrict unauthorized traffic.
● Endpoint Security Evaluation: Assess the effectiveness of endpoint detection and response (EDR), antivirus, and host-based security controls against BPL's TTPs. ● Logging and Monitoring Validation: Coordinate with City defenders to assess whether testing activities trigger appropriate alerts and detection mechanisms (purple team approach).
Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
City of Roseville, California
RFP #12-038 Cybersecurity Pentesting Services
7 8. SCADA / Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Testing
BPL will perform specialized assessment of the City's SCADA/ICS environments:
● Safe Testing Methodology: BPL employs a "low-and-slow" approach that prioritizes manual enumeration over aggressive automated scanning to ensure operational stability.
BPL has performed production SCADA environment testing for municipal clients, military infrastructure, and healthcare environments without negative impact on operations. ● Network Segmentation: Validate separation between IT and OT networks and assess boundary controls.
● Vulnerability Enumeration: Identify ICS components and assess firmware versions, default credentials, and known vulnerabilities.
● Protocol Analysis: Evaluate ICS-specific protocols (Modbus, DNP3, OPC, EtherNet/IP) for authentication weaknesses and unauthorized access.
● Compliance Mapping: Map findings to applicable ICS frameworks including NIST SP 800-82, IEC 62443, and NERC CIP.
All team members assigned to ICS/SCADA assessments have extensive training and experience in performing ICS/SCADA assessments safely and effectively. BPL has 10 years’ experience performing offensive assessments against high-profile ICS/SCADA targets without impacting operations and will work closely with City personnel to develop a thorough understanding of the systems under test before an engagement begins.
Optional / Specialized Testing Capabilities
BPL also has experience in each of the following optional and specialized testing services and can provide these dedicated services if requested during the contract term:
● Mobile Application Penetration Testing
● API Security Testing (REST, SOAP, GraphQL)
● MDM and Endpoint Security Testing
● IoT / Embedded Device Testing
● Physical Security Testing
● Third-Party / Supply Chain Security Assessment
● Red/Blue/Purple Team Engagements
● Insider Threat Simulation
It should be noted that Purple Teaming is one of BPL’s specialities and is a highly sought after service by our customers. Purple Teaming efforts can be added for any of the other service areas for additional collaborative detection/prevention efforts.
Docusign Envelope ID: A43F44C4-630E-468D-9354-D09BC76C9335
Ranking Company Name
1 Breakpoint
2 Securance
3 Global Solutions
4 Encode
5 Brownstone
6 GLI
7 Archer
8 Dotwave
9 Buzz Clan
10 Vtech
11 Affinity
12 e360
13 apogee global
14 anvaya
15 Federal ENG
16 Optiv
17 Qlogic
18 Shorebreak
19 Cyfi
20 Ampyx
21 Concourse
22 Dreadnought
23 CyberElite
24 CLA
25 Cyber360
26 Rubin Brown
27 Turquoise America
28 IMRI
29 Information Technology Company
30 Dissentient
31 Cogent
32 Troncore
33 Bureau Veritas
34 Consultadd
35 Executive Option
36 Fit Solutions
37 Fortress SRM
38 Golden Five
39 Infostride
40 Inspira
41 Ivoyant
42 eplus
43 Youcon
44 Softsages
45 Tala Secure
Cybersecurity Pentesting Services
RFP No. 12-038
Department: IT - Cybersecurity Operations
Date: 2026
for
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 5/6/2026
Item #: VI.23
File #: 0214 & 0721
Item ID: 2026-326
Title: Low Carbon Transportation Operations Program Allocation – Grant Funding Contact: Ed Scofield 916-774-5449 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff requests that the City Council authorize the City Manager, the Public Works Director, and the Alternative Transportation Manager to apply for and to execute the related forms and agreements necessary to receive FY2025-26 Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) grant funds from the State of California Department of Transportation.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager, the Public Works Director, or the Alternative Transportation Manager to apply for and to execute the related forms and agreements necessary to receive FY2025-26 Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) grant funds from the State of California Department of Transportation.
BACKGROUND
The Low Carbon Transit Operating Program (LCTOP) is a formula-based grant program established in 2014 by Senate Bill 862. The funds provide operating and capital assistance to transit agencies with the goal of reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and improving mobility. Funding for the LCTOP program is derived from California Air Resources Board (ARB) Cap-and-Trade auction proceeds. The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) is responsible for administering the program in coordination with the California ARB and the State Controller’s Office.
LCTOP funds are annually allocated to the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency (PCTPA), which then distributes the funds to local jurisdictions based on a population and fare revenue formula. The Placer County region, excluding the Lake Tahoe Basin, was allocated $622,523 of FY2025-26 Cycle A LCTOP funds pursuant to the Public Utilities Code Sections 99313 and 99314 eligible allocation distribution formulas. For FY2025-26, the region’s LCTOP funds are proposed to be allocated to the City of Roseville to support operations of the South Placer Express service (Rapid Link). These funds would help cover three years of operations for the new pilot program.
Operated by Roseville Transit, Rapid Link service is expected to launch later this year and will provide weekday express bus service between Lincoln, the Roseville Galleria Mall, Kaiser and Sutter medical centers in Roseville, and the Watt/I-80 light rail station in Sacramento County. The service will use batteryelectric buses, supported by on-route charging infrastructure to ensure reliable ongoing operations.
FISCAL IMPACT
Three years of Rapid Link operations is expected to cost approximately $4.75 million. With the addition of
$622,523 in FY2025-26 LCTOP funds, the region will have secured over $3.8 million for operations. Fare box revenue is anticipated to bring in an additional $700,000 total for the three years, which results in a minimal shortfall of approximately $200,000. Roseville will work with PCTPA and Placer County Transit to secure the remaining funds to cover three years of Rapid Link operations. No General Fund resources will be used for the South Placer Transit Project.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The South Placer Transit Project meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
3. Enhance economic vitality
4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth
6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Ed Scofield, Alternative Transportation Planner
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution 26-116
2. FY25-26 - Auth Ag & Certs & Assur
REVIEWERS:
Ed Scofield, Public Works Department - Transportation Created/Initiated - 4/14/2026 Ed Scofield, Public Works Department - Transportation Approved - 4/14/2026 Jason Shykowski, Public Works Department - All Approved - 4/17/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 4/20/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 4/20/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 4/21/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 4/22/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 4/23/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 4/24/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 4/27/2026
RESOLUTION NO. 26-116
AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO SUBMIT LOW CARBON TRANSIT
OPERATIONS PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATIONS AND TO EXECUTE THE RELATED
GRANT APPLICATIONS, FORMS AND AGREEMENTS
WHEREAS, the City of Roseville is eligible to receive state funding from the Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) for transit projects; and WHEREAS, $622,523 is available to the City of Roseville for Fiscal Year 2025-26; and
WHEREAS, the statutes related to state-funded transit projects require a local implementing agency to abide by various regulations; and
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 862 (2014) named the California Department of Transportation as the administrative agency for the LCTOP; and
WHEREAS, there are guidelines for the purpose of administering and distributing LCTOP funds to eligible local agencies; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends applying for available LCTOP funds in order to support operations of the South Placer Express service (Rapid Link); and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville that as the fund recipient, the City of Roseville agrees to comply with all conditions and requirements set forth in the Certification and Assurances and the Authorized Agent documents and applicable statutes, regulations and guidelines for all LCTOP funded transit projects; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Roseville hereby authorizes the City Manager or his designee to submit Low Carbon Transit Operations Program Grant applications and to execute the related grant applications, forms and agreements.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of __________________________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
___________________________
City Clerk
FY 2025-2026 LCTOP
Authorized Agent
AS THE City Manager
(Chief Executive Officer/Director/President/Secretary)
OF THE City of Roseville
(Name of County/City/Transit Organization)
I hereby authorize the following individual(s) to execute for and on behalf of the named Regional Entity/Transit Operator, any actions necessary for the purpose of obtaining Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) funds provided by the California Department of Transportation, Division of Local Assistance. I understand that if there is a change in the authorized agent, the project sponsor must submit a new form. This form is required even when the authorized agent is the executive authority himself. I understand the Board must provide a resolution approving the Authorized Agent. The Board Resolution appointing the Authorized Agent is attached.
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director OR
(Name and Title of Authorized Agent)
Ed Scofield, Alternative Transportation Manager OR
(Name and Title of Authorized Agent)
Click here to enter text. OR
(Name and Title of Authorized Agent)
Click here to enter text. OR
(Name and Title of Authorized Agent)
Dominick Casey City Manager
(Print Name) (Title)
(Signature)
Approved this 6
day
of May , 2026
FY 2025-2026 LCTOP
Certifications and Assurances
Lead Agency: City of Roseville
Project Title: South Placer Transit Express (Rapid Link) Service Operations Prepared by: Kimberly Goulet
The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) has adopted the following Certifications and Assurances for the Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP).
As a condition of the receipt of LCTOP funds, Lead Agency must comply with these terms and conditions.
A. General
1. The Lead Agency agrees to abide by the current LCTOP Guidelines and applicable legal requirements.
2. The Lead Agency must submit to Caltrans a signed Authorized Agent form designating the representative who can submit documents on behalf of the project sponsor and a copy of the board resolution appointing the Authorized Agent.
B. Project Administration
1. The Lead Agency certifies that required environmental documentation is complete before requesting an allocation of LCTOP funds. The Lead Agency assures that projects approved for LCTOP funding comply with Public Resources Code § 21100 and § 21150.
2. The Lead Agency certifies that a dedicated bank account for LCTOP funds only will be established within 30 days of receipt of LCTOP funds.
3. The Lead Agency certifies that when LCTOP funds are used for a transit capital project, that the project will be completed and remain in operation for its useful life.
4. The Lead Agency certifies that it has the legal, financial, and technical capacity to carry out the project, including the safety and security aspects of that project.
5. The Lead Agency certifies that they will notify Caltrans of pending litigation, dispute, or negative audit findings related to the project, before receiving an allocation of funds.
6. The Lead Agency must maintain satisfactory continuing control over the use of project equipment and facilities and will adequately maintain project equipment and facilities for the useful life of the project.
7. Any interest the Lead Agency earns on LCTOP funds must be used only on approved LCTOP projects.
FY 2025-2026 LCTOP
8. The Lead Agency must notify Caltrans of any changes to the approved project with a Corrective Action Plan (CAP).
9. Under extraordinary circumstances, a Lead Agency may terminate a project prior to completion. In the event the Lead Agency terminates a project prior to completion, the Lead Agency must (1) contact Caltrans in writing and follow-up with a phone call verifying receipt of such notice; (2) pursuant to verification, submit a final report indicating the reason for the termination and demonstrating the expended funds were used on the intended purpose; (3) submit a request to reassign the funds to a new project within 180 days of termination.
C. Reporting
1. The Lead Agency must submit the following LCTOP reports:
a. Annual Project Activity Reports October 30th each year. b. A Close Out Report within six months of project completion. c. The annual audit required under the Transportation Development Act (TDA), to verify receipt and appropriate expenditure of LCTOP funds. A copy of the audit report must be submitted to Caltrans within six months of the close of the year (December 31) each year in which LCTOP funds have been received or expended.
d. Project Outcome Reporting as defined by CARB Funding Guidelines. e. Jobs Reporting as defined by CARB Funding Guidelines.
2. Other Reporting Requirements: CARB develops and revises Funding Guidelines that will include reporting requirements for all State agencies that receive appropriations from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund. Caltrans and project sponsors will need to submit reporting information in accordance with CARB’s Funding Guidelines, including reporting on greenhouse gas reductions and benefits to disadvantaged communities.
D. Cost Principles
1. The Lead Agency agrees to comply with Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations 225 (2 CFR 225), Cost Principles for State and Local Government, and 2 CFR, Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments.
2. The Lead Agency agrees, and will assure that its contractors and subcontractors will be obligated to agree, that:
a. Contract Cost Principles and Procedures, 48 CFR, Federal Acquisition Regulations System, Chapter 1, Part 31, et seq., shall be used to determine the allow ability of individual project cost items and
FY 2025-2026 LCTOP
b. Those parties shall comply with Federal administrative procedures in accordance with 2 CFR, Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments. Every sub-recipient receiving LCTOP funds as a contractor or sub-contractor shall comply with
Federal administrative procedures in accordance with 2 CFR, Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments.
3. Any project cost for which the Lead Agency has received funds that are determined by subsequent audit to be unallowable under 2 CFR 225, 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31 or 2 CFR, Part 200, are subject to repayment by the Lead Agency to the State of California (State). All projects must reduce greenhouse gas emissions, as required under Public Resources Code section 75230, and any project that fails to reduce greenhouse gases shall also have its project costs submit to repayment by the Lead Agency to the State. Should the Lead Agency fail to reimburse moneys due to the State within thirty (30) days of demand, or within such other period as may be agreed in writing between the Parties hereto, the State is authorized to intercept and withhold future payments due the Lead Agency from the State or any third-party source, including but not limited to, the State Treasurer and the State Controller.
A. Record Retention
1. The Lead Agency agrees and will assure that its contractors and subcontractors shall establish and maintain an accounting system and records that properly accumulate and segregate incurred project costs and matching funds by line item for the project.
The accounting system of the Lead Agency, its contractors and all subcontractors shall conform to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and enable the determination of incurred costs at interim points of completion. All accounting records and other supporting papers of the Lead Agency, its contractors and subcontractors connected with LCTOP funding shall be maintained for a minimum of three (3) years after the “Project Closeout” report or final Phase 2 report is submitted (per CARB Funding Guidelines, Vol. 3, page 3.A-16), and shall be held open to inspection, copying, and audit by representatives of the State and the California State Auditor.
Copies thereof will be furnished by the Lead Agency, its contractors, and subcontractors upon receipt of any request made by the State or its agents. In conducting an audit of the costs claimed, the State will rely to the maximum extent possible on any prior audit of the Lead Agency pursuant to the provisions of federal and State law. In the absence of such an audit, any acceptable audit work performed by the Lead Agency’s external and internal auditors may be relied upon and used by the State when planning and conducting additional audits.
2. For the purpose of determining compliance with Title 21, California Code of Regulations, Section 2500 et seq., when applicable, and other matters connected with
FY 2025-2026 LCTOP
the performance of the Lead Agency’s contracts with third parties pursuant to Government Code § 8546.7, the project sponsor, its contractors and subcontractors and the State shall each maintain and make available for inspection all books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to the performance of such contracts, including, but not limited to, the costs of administering those various contracts. All of the above referenced parties shall make such materials available at their respective offices at all reasonable times during the entire project period and for three (3) years from the date of final payment. The State, the California State Auditor, or any duly authorized representative of the State, shall each have access to any books, records, and documents that are pertinent to a project for audits, examinations, excerpts, and transactions, and the Lead Agency shall furnish copies thereof if requested.
3. The Lead Agency, its contractors and subcontractors will permit access to all records of employment, employment advertisements, employment application forms, and other pertinent data and records by the Civil Rights Department, or any other agency of the State of California designated by the State, for the purpose of any investigation to ascertain compliance with this document.
F. Special Situations
Caltrans may perform an audit and/or request detailed project information of the project sponsor’s LCTOP funded projects at Caltrans’ discretion at any time prior to the completion of the LCTOP.
I certify all these conditions will be met.
Ed Scofield Alternative Transportation Manager
(Print Authorized Agent) (Title)
(Signature) (Date)
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 5/6/2026
Item #: VI.24
File #: 0214 & 0900-04-01
Item ID: 2026-327
Title: Fiddyment Road Arterial Resurfacing Project - Grant Authorization Contact: Joseph Arino 916-774-5460 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to submit a System Preservation grant application for the Sacramento Area Council of Governments 2026 Federal Funding Program and to execute all grant documents and timely project delivery requirements.
The Fiddyment Rd Arterial Resurfacing Project will apply a microsurfacing preventative maintenance resurface treatment on Fiddyment Road from Baseline Road to Blue Oaks Boulevard. The project is estimated to cost $5.5 million and, if successful, will be funded by $3 million from the Surface Transportation Block Grant Program System Preservation grant, and local funds including potentially the General Fund.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff Recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to submit a Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBG) System Preservation grant application for the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) 2026 Federal Funding Program and to execute all grant documents and timely project delivery requirements.
BACKGROUND
SACOG recently released a notification of a funding opportunity for the Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBG) System Preservation 2026 Federal Funding program. The funding program is a competitive grant opportunity that provides agencies in the greater six-county Sacramento area with funding to assist with maintaining the transportation network. The program's goal is to help direct federal transportation dollars to the region's highest priority projects. Staff are confident that the Fiddyment Rd Arterial Resurfacing Project will compete well for this grant.
As part of the City's proactive street preventative pavement maintenance program, the Fiddyment Rd Arterial Resurfacing Project will resurface Fiddyment Road from Baseline Road to Blue Oaks Boulevard.
Preservation projects are designed to seal, protect, and preserve the underlying pavement by placing relatively affordable asphalt resurfacing products. Preventative maintenance surface treatments extend the useful life of roadways by providing a wearing course that is designed to seal and protect the existing asphalt pavement.
The project scope includes the removal and replacement of failed pavement, and the application of a Microsurfacing preventative maintenance surface treatment to the pavement. Other improvements to replace non-compliant ADA curb ramps and aging traffic signal detection will be included as needed.
Depending on the grant award, construction is tentatively scheduled for the summer of 2029.
FISCAL IMPACT
The project is estimated to cost $5.5 million and, if successful, will be funded by $3 million from the 2026 SACOG System Preservation Funding Program and $2.5 million of local funds, including potentially the General Fund.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) only applies to projects which have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)). The requested grant authorization meets this criteria and no additional review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
2. Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world
4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth
Respectfully Submitted,
Joseph Arino, Assistant Engineer
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Project Location Map - Fiddyment Road Arterial Resurfacing
2. Resolution 26-147
REVIEWERS:
Jesse Khatkar, Public Works Department - Engineering - City Projects Created/Initiated - 4/15/2026 Jesse Khatkar, Public Works Department - Engineering - City Projects Approved - 4/15/2026 Noah Siviglia, Public Works Department - Engineering - City Projects Approved - 4/15/2026 Stefanie Kemen, Public Works Department - Administration Division Approved - 4/16/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 4/21/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 4/22/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 4/23/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 4/23/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 4/24/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 4/24/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 4/27/2026
BLUE OAKS BL
FIDDYMENT RD
BASELINE RD
PLEASANT GROVE BL
W
O
ODC
REEK
OAKS
BL
JUNCTION BL
DEL
WEB
B
BL
VISTA GRANDE BL
[
0 0.5 1
Miles
PW - Engineering
S:\Arcdata\ABoardman\PW\Map _Requests\CIP Location Maps\Location Maps\Location Maps.aprx Date Saved: 4/15/2026 11:30 AM Fiddyment Road Arterial Resurfacing Project – Location Map Project Location
RESOLUTION NO. 26-147
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AUTHORIZING APPLICATIONS FOR
GRANT FUNDING FROM THE SACRAMENTO AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (SACOG) 2026 FEDERAL FUNDING PROGRAMS; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR DESIGNEE TO SUBMIT THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE SACOG 2026 FEDERAL FUNDING PROGRAM APPLICATION PRIORITIES; AND AUTHORIZING THE
CITY MANAGER OR DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE ALL GRANT DOCUMENTS AND
TIMELY PROJECT DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS
WHEREAS, the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) has announced three 2026 Federal Funding Cycle Programs (Funding Programs), which are open to sponsoring agencies within the six-county SACOG region: System Preservation Program, System Performance Program, and Next Generation Solutions & Clean Air Program; and WHEREAS, the System Preservation Program invests in maintaining and resurfacing major roadways that keep people and goods moving; and
WHEREAS, eligible projects for Funding Programs must be listed in the 2025 Blueprint or fit within 2025 Blueprint lump-sum project categories including but not limited to road maintenance and reconstruction, transit vehicle replacements, operational improvements, Intelligent Transportation Systems, and bicycle and pedestrian investments; and WHEREAS, SACOG limits Funding Programs grant applications to no more than three applications per sponsoring agency for any one of the three different Funding Programs to SACOG, up to a maximum of nine total applications per sponsoring agency; and WHEREAS, applicants shall affirm their commitment to delivering projects in accordance with the requirements of Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG) Program and Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality (CMAQ) Improvement Program, as applicable; and WHEREAS, grant proposals for construction work shall obligate Funding Program dollars for construction activities no later than the end of federal fiscal year 2028-29; and WHEREAS, SACOG will not provide additional federal or state funding in the event that cost overruns are identified; and
WHEREAS, project sponsors shall commit to providing local matching dollars, typically
11.47% of the total project cost; and
WHEREAS, SACOG requires that if awarded federal funds by the SACOG Board, City of Roseville staff responsible for project delivery must attend quarterly project delivery meetings with SACOG staff to receive assistance until project closeout.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Roseville as follows:
SECTION 1. City Manager or designee is authorized to execute all documents necessary to committing the City of Roseville to federal, state and regional funding and project delivery requirements, including but not limited to abiding by Funding Program guidelines.
SECTION 2. Acknowledges that in the event of receiving an award by the SACOG Board of Funding Program dollars, that the City of Roseville will be required to abide by multiple timely use of funding requirements described in Funding Program guidelines and SACOG’s Regional Delivery Policies, including but not limited to, obligating federal funding no later than the end of federal fiscal year 2028-2029 for construction activities, committing to securing required local match dollars, acknowledge that SACOG does not cover cost overruns, and commits staff to attend delivery meetings until project closeout.
SECTION 3. City Manager or designee is directed to submit an application for 2026 SixCounty Federal Funding Cycle Programs for the Fiddyment Road Arterial Resurfacing Project.
The project scope includes the removal and replacement of failed pavement, the application of a Microsurfacing preventative maintenance surface treatment to the pavement, and other improvements as necessary including but not limited to replacement of non-compliant ADA curb ramps and aging traffic signal detection, etc.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of __________________________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 5/6/2026
Item #: VI.25
File #: 0102-06
Item ID: 2026-353
Title: Proclamation - Public Service Recognition Week
Contact: Arleta Wagenhals 916-774-5200 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Proclaim May 3-9, 2026, as Public Service Recognition Week and encourage all citizens to recognize the accomplishments and contributions of government employees at all levels.
RECOMMENDATION
Proclaim May 3-9, 2026, as Public Service Recognition Week and encourage all citizens to recognize the accomplishments and contributions of government employees at all levels.
BACKGROUND
Not Applicable.
FISCAL IMPACT
Not Applicable.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378.
Council approval of a proclamation meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Arleta Wagenhals, City Clerk Technician
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Proclamation - Public Service Recognition Week
REVIEWERS:
Arleta Wagenhals, City Clerk Department Created/Initiated - 4/22/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 4/22/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Final Approval - 4/22/2026
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 5/6/2026
Item #: VI.26
File #: 0102-06
Item ID: 2026-329
Title: Proclamation - Professional Municipal Clerks Week Contact: Arleta Wagenhals 916-774-5200 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Proclaim the week of May 3-9, 2026, as Professional Municipal Clerks Week, and further extend appreciation to our Professional Municipal City Clerk's Department, and to all Professional Municipal Clerks for the vital services they perform and their exemplary dedication to the communities they represent.
RECOMMENDATION
Proclaim the week of May 3-9, 2026, as Professional Municipal Clerks Week, and further extend appreciation to our Professional Municipal City Clerk's Department, and to all Professional Municipal Clerks for the vital services they perform and their exemplary dedication to the communities they represent.
BACKGROUND
Not applicable.
FISCAL IMPACT
Not Applicable.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378.
Council approval of a proclamation meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Arleta Wagenhals, City Clerk Technician
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Proclamation - Municipal Clerks Week
REVIEWERS:
Arleta Wagenhals, City Clerk Department Created/Initiated - 4/15/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 4/16/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Final Approval - 4/22/2026
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 5/6/2026
Item #: VI.27
File #: 0102-06
Item ID: 2026-351
Title: Proclamation - National Small Business Month
Contact: Arleta Wagenhals 916-774-5200 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Proclaim May 2026 as National Small Business Month and encourage support of this national effort so America’s small businesses can do what they do best – grow their businesses, create jobs, and ensure that our communities remain as vibrant tomorrow as they are today.
RECOMMENDATION
Proclaim May 2026 as National Small Business Month and encourage support of this national effort so America’s small businesses can do what they do best – grow their businesses, create jobs, and ensure that our communities remain as vibrant tomorrow as they are today.
BACKGROUND
Not Applicable.
FISCAL IMPACT
Not Applicable.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378.
Council approval of a proclamation meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
3. Enhance economic vitality
Respectfully Submitted,
Arleta Wagenhals, City Clerk Technician
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
ATTACHMENTS:
1. National Small Business Month 2026
REVIEWERS:
Arleta Wagenhals, City Clerk Department Created/Initiated - 4/21/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 4/22/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Final Approval - 4/22/2026
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 5/6/2026
Item #: VI.28
File #: 0102-10
Item ID: 2026-358
Title: Resolution - Troy Bergstrom
Contact: Arleta Wagenhals 916-774-5200 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Commend Troy Bergstrom, who is retiring from the Roseville Police Department, for his 26 years of outstanding leadership, unwavering dedication, and extraordinary contributions to public safety and the Roseville community. We express sincere gratitude for his 31 years of distinguished service and extend best wishes to Chief Bergstrom and his family for a well-earned and fulfilling retirement.
RECOMMENDATION
Commend Troy Bergstrom for his 26 years of outstanding leadership, unwavering dedication, and extraordinary contributions to public safety and the Roseville community. We express sincere gratitude for his 31 years of distinguished service and extend best wishes to Chief Bergstrom and his family for a wellearned and fulfilling retirement.
BACKGROUND
Not Applicable.
FISCAL IMPACT
Not Applicable.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378.
Council approval of a resolution meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Arleta Wagenhals, City Clerk Technician
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution - Troy Bergstrom
REVIEWERS:
Arleta Wagenhals, City Clerk Department Created/Initiated - 4/23/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 4/23/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Final Approval - 4/23/2026
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 5/6/2026
Item #: VI.29
File #: 0102-10
Item ID: 2026-360
Title: Resolution - Heather Blanco
Contact: Arleta Wagenhals 916-774-5200 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Commend Heather Blanco, who is retiring from the City Managers Office, for her 20 years of outstanding service, dedication and contributions to the community. We extend sincere appreciation and best wishes to Heather for a fulfilling and well-deserved retirement, with gratitude for the lasting impact she has made on the organization and the many lives she has touched.
RECOMMENDATION
Commend Heather Blanco for her 20 years of outstanding service, dedication and contributions to the community. We extend sincere appreciation and best wishes to Heather for a fulfilling and well-deserved retirement, with gratitude for the lasting impact she has made on the organization and the many lives she has touched.
BACKGROUND
Not Applicable.
FISCAL IMPACT
Not Applicable.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378.
Council approval of a resolution meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Arleta Wagenhals, City Clerk Technician
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution - Heather Blanco
REVIEWERS:
Arleta Wagenhals, City Clerk Department Created/Initiated - 4/23/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 4/23/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Final Approval - 4/23/2026
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 5/6/2026
Item #: VI.30
File #: 0102-10
Item ID: 2026-330
Title: Resolution - Julie Manfredi
Contact: Arleta Wagenhals 916-774-5200 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Commend Julie Manfredi, who is retiring from the Electric Department, for 19 years of outstanding service and dedication to the City of Roseville and extend wishes for a long, healthy, and enjoyable retirement.
RECOMMENDATION
Commend Julie Manfredi for 19 years of outstanding service and dedication to the City of Roseville and extend wishes for a long, healthy, and enjoyable retirement.
BACKGROUND
Not applicable.
FISCAL IMPACT
Not applicable.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378.
Council approval of a resolution meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Arleta Wagenhals, City Clerk Technician
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution - Julie Manfredi
REVIEWERS:
Arleta Wagenhals, City Clerk Department Created/Initiated - 4/15/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 4/16/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Final Approval - 4/22/2026
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 5/6/2026
Item #: VI.31
File #: 0102-03
Item ID: 2026-322
Title: Minutes of Prior Meetings
Contact: Christine Mesaros 916-774-5287 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of the minutes of the April 15, 2026, City Council Closed Session Meeting and April 15, 2026 City Council / Natural Gas Financing Authority Meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the minutes of the April 15, 2026, City Council Closed Session Meeting and April 15, 2026 City Council / Natural Gas Financing Authority Meeting.
BACKGROUND
Not applicable.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this request.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The City Council minutes are not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Christine Mesaros, City Clerk Technician
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
ATTACHMENTS:
1. April 15, 2026 City Council Closed Session Meeting_Minutes
2. April 15, 2026 City Council Meeting_Minutes
REVIEWERS:
Arleta Wagenhals, City Clerk Department Created/Initiated - 4/21/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 4/21/2026
Krista Bernasconi, Mayor
Karen Alvord, Vice Mayor
Bruce Houdesheldt, Councilmember
Tracy Mendonsa, Councilmember
Pauline Roccucci, Councilmember
Dominick Casey, City Manager
Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
MINUTES
City Council Closed Session Meeting
April 15, 2026
5:30 PM
Roseville Electric Building,
116 S. Grant Street, First Floor
I. CALL TO ORDER
Vice Mayor Alvord called the meeting to order at 5:41 P.M.
II. ROLL CALL
Present: Vice Mayor Alvord, Councilmember Houdesheldt, Councilmember Roccucci.
Absent: Mayor Bernasconi, Councilmember Mendonsa.
III. PUBLIC COMMENTS
No public comments received.
IV. CLOSED SESSION
1. Conference with Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation Summary: Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) Significant exposure to litigation – one case
CONTACT: Michelle Sheidenberger 916-774-5325 [email protected] Closed Session Disclosure: No reportable action taken.
V. ADJOURNMENT
Vice Mayor Alvord adjourned the meeting at 5:50 P.M.
Krista Bernasconi, Mayor
Karen Alvord, Vice Mayor
Bruce Houdesheldt, Councilmember
Tracy Mendonsa, Councilmember
Pauline Roccucci, Councilmember
Dominick Casey, City Manager
Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
MINUTES
City Council /Natural Gas Financing Authority Meeting
April 15, 2026
6:00 PM
Roseville Electric Building,
116 S. Grant Street, 1st Floor
I. CALL TO ORDER
Vice Mayor Alvord called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM.
II. ROLL CALL
Present: Vice Mayor Alvord, Councilmember Houdesheldt, Councilmember Roccucci.
Absent: Mayor Bernasconi, Councilmember Mendonsa.
III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Assistant City Manager Ryan DeVore led the Pledge of Allegiance.
IV. MEETING PROCEDURES
City Clerk Carmen Avalos announced the procedures for addressing the City Council.
V. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the first opportunity to make a public comment on non-agenda items.
Donald Gould - Spoke on police efforts, traffic camera needs and donations for the police department.
David Lund - Spoke on traffic/speeding concerns on various roads in the city.
Jennifer Chapman - Spoke on Grants Commission meeting, the Cirby Creek Mitigation Plan workshop and support for more workshops.
VI. CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion by Councilmember Houdeshedt, seconded by Councilmember Roccucci, to drop item 19 to be re-agendized at a future council meeting and to approve the remaining items as recommended. The motion passed.
Ayes: Vice Mayor Alvord, Councilmember Houdesheldt, Councilmember Roccucci.
Absent: Mayor Bernasconi, Councilmember Mendonsa.
1. Electric New Services and Surplus Transfer - Budget Adjustments (ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT -
FINANCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of two budget adjustments: $2,500,000 for the existing Electric New Services Capital Improvement Project and Contribution in Aid of Construction revenues and $6,500,000 for a transfer from the Electric Fund to the Electric Rate Stabilization Fund. These budget adjustments increase capital expenses and capital revenues for the Electric New Services project in the Electric Fund, and transfer surplus operating funds from the Electric Fund to the Rate Stabilization Fund.
CONTACT: Matt Nelson 916-774-5618 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Ordinance No. 7058 authorizing certain amendments to the fiscal year 2025-26 budget and declaring this ordinance to be immediately effective as an appropriation measure; and b. Adopt Ordinance No. 7059 authorizing certain amendments to the fiscal year 2025-26 budget and declaring this ordinance to be immediately effective as an appropriation measure.
2. Sunset Energy Center Project - Budget Adjustment and Change Order Increase (ELECTRIC
DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a budget adjustment appropriating $4,000,000 in the Electric Fund to the Sunset Energy Center Project, formerly known as the Roseville Power Plant #2 Repower Project. Staff also requests authorization for the City Manager, or designee, to increase change order authority by an additional five percent (5%) to a total of ten percent (10%) of the contract price for the Design-Build Construction Agreement with Integrated Engineers and Contractors Corporation dba IEC Corporation for a total not to exceed amount of $42,719,517.
CONTACT: Ozro Corulli 916-774-5586 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Ordinance No. 7064 authorizing certain amendments to the fiscal year 2025-26 budget and declaring this ordinance to be immediately effective as an appropriation measure; and b. Adopt Resolution No. 26-092 approving an increase in change order authority.
3. Parcel FD-21 Phase A - Notice of Completion (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT -
ENGINEERING DIVISION)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the Notice of Completion for Parcel FD-21 Phase A as complete. The Engineering Division has made final inspection of the project and has found the civil improvement work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications. This action has no impact to the City's General Fund. Construction costs were paid by the developer.
CONTACT: Pablo Macias 916-746-1324 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-081 accepting the public work known as Parcel FD-21 Phase A project, approving the "Notice of Completion", and authorizing and directing the City Engineer to execute said notice on behalf of the City of Roseville, therefore, and accepting all dedications offered on the recorded map of the subdivision.
4. Parcel FD-21 Phase B - Notice of Completion (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT -
ENGINEERING DIVISION)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the Notice of Completion for Parcel FD-21 Phase B as complete. The Engineering Division has made final inspection of the project and has found the civil improvement work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications. This action has no impact to the City's General Fund. Construction costs were paid by the developer.
CONTACT: Pablo Macias 916-746-1324 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-082 accepting the public work known as Parcel FD-21 Phase B project, approving the "Notice of Completion", and authorizing and directing the City Engineer to execute said notice on behalf of the City of Roseville, therefore, and accepting all dedications offered on the recorded map of the subdivision.
5. 2025 Street Condition Assessment and Road Matrix - Contract Purchase Agreement Amendment (PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - STREET MAINTENANCE) Summary: Staff recommends approval of an amendment to the existing contract purchase agreement with Stantec Consulting Services Inc. to provide 45 additional miles of pavement condition survey. The additional miles were not included in the initial proposal. The additional mileage was identified as part of the scope map after the survey began. The contract amendment will increase the cost of the contract by $5,895 to a total of $115,460. The additional amount is needed to cover the added pavement/maintenance areas in the City due to new development. Funding will come from the Highway Users Tax Fund; no General Fund resources will be used for the project.
CONTACT: James Shelton 916-746-1192 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-083 approving a contract purchase agreement amendment, by and between the City of Roseville and Stantec Consulting Services Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
6. Stoney Point Way Drainage Repair Project — Award of Construction Agreement and Budget Adjustment (PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING - CITY PROJECTS)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a construction agreement with T.P.A Construction, Inc. in the amount of $1,544,922 for the Stoney Point Way Drainage Repair Project, along with the associated budget adjustment. The project includes rehabilitating two manhole bases, inspecting existing pipes, patching damaged sections, and applying a concrete spray liner to the interior of the pipes. The budget adjustment will increase project funding from the Highway User Tax fund by $1,700,000 for a total budget of $1,900,000. No General Fund resources will be used for this project.
CONTACT: Laura Salcedo 916-774-5437 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-087 approving an agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and T.P.A Construction, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville;
b. Adopt Ordinance No. 7057 authorizing certain amendments to the fiscal year 2025-26 budget and declaring this ordinance to be immediately effective as an appropriation measure.
7. Roseville Parkway Widening Phase 1 Project - Agreement for Acquisition of Real Property (PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING - CITY PROJECTS) Summary: Staff recommends approval of the agreement for Acquisition of Real Property with Urban Roseville LLC in the amount of $31,199.25 for the purchase of property for the Roseville Parkway Widening - Phase 1 Project. The scope of the Project consists of widening portions of Roseville Parkway from West Drive to Creekside Ridge Drive and adding a third left-turn lane at southbound Pleasant Grove Boulevard onto eastbound Roseville Parkway. The construction of the project is estimated to cost $3.5 million and will be primarily funded by the special tax revenue generated in the North Central Roseville Community Facilities District No. 1. No General Fund resources will be used for the project.
CONTACT: Karen Vences 916-774-5412 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-089 approving an agreement for acquisition of real property, by and between the City of Roseville and Urban Roseville LLC, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
8. Staffing and Salary Schedule Updates (HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the recommended classifications and salary range adjustments and associated allocation schedules for Roseville Police Association (RPA), Management, Temporary, and International Union of Operating Engineers, Stationary Engineers, Local 39 (Local 39) bargaining units. The estimated total cost of the recommended classification and salary range adjustments to the General Services Fund will be $10,303 for the remainder of FY 2025-26, which can be absorbed by existing appropriations; therefore, no budget adjustment is required at this time. For the Water, Wastewater and Waste Services
Operations Funds will be a cost savings of $10,075 for the remainder of FY2025-26. Beyond this fiscal year, the recommended changes have an annual ongoing impact of $53,576 on the General Services Fund and a cost saving of $52,389 on the Water, Wastewater and Waste Services Operations Funds.
CONTACT: Macy Dippert 916-774-5215 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Ordinance No. 7060 amending Ordinance No. 7046, the salary Ordinance for non-sworn employees represented by the Roseville Police Association, as amended by appendix “H” to be effective April 18, 2026, as an urgency measure; and
b. Adopt Ordinance No. 7061 amending Ordinance No. 7054, the salary Ordinance for Seasonal/Temporary Employees, as amended by appendix “C” to be effective April 18, 2026, as an urgency measure; and
c. Adopt Ordinance No. 7062 amending Ordinance No. 7021, the salary Ordinance for employees represented by the International Union of Operating Engineers, Stationary Engineers, Local 39, as amended by appendix “K” to be effective April 18, 2026, as an urgency measure; and d. Adopt Ordinance No. 7063 amending Ordinance No. 7047, the salary Ordinance for Management Employees, as amended by appendix “P” to be effective April 18, 2026, as an urgency measure.
9. Operation and Maintenance of Woodcreek Intertie Improvements - Agreement (ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT - WATER)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of an agreement with Placer County Water Agency for Operation and Maintenance of the Woodcreek Intertie Improvements which specifies the provisions and conditions of the annual water entitlement amounts, supply reliability exchanges, emergency deliveries, and capacity sharing. This agreement has no General Fund impact.
CONTACT: Janice Gainey 916-774-5535 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-090 approving an agreement for the Operation and Maintenance of the Woodcreek Intertie Improvements, by and between the City of Roseville and Placer County Water Agency and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
10. Fire Department Strike Team Reimbursements - Budget Adjustment (FIRE DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends approval of a budget adjustment to recognize $552,627 in additional overtime expenses, $4,898 in other reimbursable items/logistics, $792,360 in revenue related to the department's participation in reimbursable strike teams, and a $234,835 positive impact contribution to the General Fund available resources for fleet usage and overhead.
CONTACT: Matthew Lauchner 916-774-5807 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Ordinance No. 7056 authorizing certain amendments to the fiscal year 2025-26 budget and declaring this ordinance to be immediately effective as an appropriation measure.
11. Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus Purchases, Service and Testing - Contract Purchase Agreement (FIRE DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a contract purchase agreement with MES Service Company, LLC for Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) equipment, maintenance, service and testing on an as-needed basis by the Roseville Fire Department based upon the Master Price Agreement for the remainder of the initial term of 4 years with an optional one-year renewal term as a qualified government member of National Purchasing Partners. The City will utilize the League of Oregon Cities contract number PS26240 through National Purchasing Partners. The total estimated cost for Fire Department SCBA equipment, maintenance and repair costs is $600,000 for the remainder of the 48-month term of the contract, March 18, 2026, to March 18, 2030, and $150,000 for the extension year from March, 18, 2030 to March 18, 2031.
CONTACT: Jamie Pepin 916-774-5400 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-084 approving a contract purchase agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and MES I Acquisition Inc. dba MES Service Company, LLC and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
12. Roseville Municipal Code Amendments - Purchasing System (FINANCE DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends that the City Council introduce for first reading an ordinance amending Sections 4.12.090, 4.12.095, 4.12.105, and 4.12.110 of Title 4 of the Roseville Municipal Code related to purchasing procedures, cooperative purchasing, and the disposition of real property. The proposed updates are administrative in nature and make minor modifications to align the Municipal Code with City Charter publication requirements, ensure consistency with the Surplus Land Act, clarify that cooperative purchasing agreements may be used for terms of up to five years (including amendments), and provide additional examples of available cooperative purchasing agreements.
CONTACT: Shannon Wiest 916-746-1112 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Introduce, for first reading, an ordinance amending Sections 4.12.090, 4.12.095, 4.12.105, and
4.12.110 of Chapter 4.12 of Title 4 of the Roseville Municipal Code related to purchasing procedures, cooperative purchasing, and real property disposition.
13. Business Operations Tax Consulting Administration - Professional Services Agreement (FINANCE DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a professional services agreement with Hinderliter, De Llamas & Associates dba HdL Companies (HdL) to provide business operations tax administration consulting services. The agreement includes an annual not-to-exceed amount of $340,000. This consists of a 35% fee on recovered revenue from discovery and audit services and 25% for collection services. Actual costs will vary based on activity levels and revenues generated through HdL’s efforts. Adequate funding is available in the FY2025-26 adopted budget to support this agreement. Funding for future years will be included in the proposed FY2026-27 General Fund budget and future budgets.
CONTACT: Jeannine Thrash 916-774-5473 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-088 approving a professional services agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Hinderliter, De Llamas & Associates dba HdL Companies and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
14. Tax Revenue Consulting - Short-Term Rental Administrative Services - Professional Services Agreement Amendment (FINANCE DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a fourth amendment to the professional services agreement with Hinderliter, de Llamas & Associates, dba HdL Companies, to extend short-term rental administration services for an additional six months in order to complete a request for proposals competitive procurement process. Sufficient funding is available in the Finance Department’s FY2025-26 General Fund budget to support this extension through the end of the fiscal year. The Finance Department will fund the remaining portion of the agreement within the proposed FY2026-27 General Fund budget.
CONTACT: Jeannine Thrash 916-774-5473 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-094 approving a fourth amendment to professional services agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Hinderliter, de Llamas & Associates dba HdL Companies, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
15. Annual Audit Reports (FINANCE DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends the City Council receive four informational financial reports for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025: Single Audit, Electric Enterprise Fund, Other Post-Employment Benefit Trust Fund, and Roseville Natural Gas Financing Authority, along with five required auditor communication letters; and one informational financial report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024, Transportation Development Act Funds, along with one management letter.
There is no impact to the City’s General Fund.
CONTACT: Teri Quinlan 916-774-5316 [email protected]
The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Receive the Annual Audit Reports.
16. 2026 Legislative and Regulatory Platform for State and Federal Advocacy (PUBLIC AFFAIRS AND
COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends adoption of the 2026 Legislative and Regulatory Platform for State and Federal Advocacy. The proposed 2026 Legislative and Regulatory Platform establishes the City's priorities and positions for state and federal advocacy, aligned with City Council goals.
Adoption of the platform authorizes the City to actively engage in legislative, regulatory, and funding efforts, including taking positions on legislation and participating in advocacy and legal actions when appropriate. The platform provides a consistent framework to guide City advocacy throughout the year and is updated annually to reflect evolving priorities and external conditions.
CONTACT: Rob Baquera 916-746-1170 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt the 2026 Legislative and Regulatory Platform for State and Federal Advocacy.
17. Downtown Roseville Property and Business Improvement District - 2025 Annual Report and 2026 Budget (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the 2025 Downtown Roseville Property and Business Improvement District Annual Report and the 2026 Budget for the Downtown Roseville Partnership. The City contributes to the Property and Business Improvement District each year in the form of parcel assessments for City-owned property in Downtown Roseville. Receiving the annual report has no impact on the General Fund and a maximum of 2% of the property assessment will be retained by the City to cover the costs of administration of the management agreement.
CONTACT: Gina McColl 916-774-5452 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-091 approving the 2025 Downtown Roseville Property and Business Improvement District Annual Report and 2026 Budget.
18. Electronic Content Management System Upgrade – Contract Purchase Agreement Amendment (INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT - CLIENT & INNOVATION SERVICES) Summary: Staff recommends approval of a contract purchase agreement amendment with Naviant Holdings LLC dba Naviant LLC to include professional services for the upgrade of the existing OnBase Solution. The contract amendment will increase the cost of the contract by $4,516, to a total of $490,783. Funding is included in the Information Technology Operations Fund FY2025-26 budget.
CONTACT: Melissa Patrick 916-774-5127 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-085 approving amendment #3 to contract purchase agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Naviant Holdings LLC dba Naviant LLC and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
19. Impound Fee for Out-of-Class Electric Bicycles (POLICE DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends adopting an electric bicycle impound fee in the amount of $252.50 pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 22651.08 and to incorporate such fee into the City's most current master Schedule of User and Regulatory Fees. There is no fiscal impact associated with the proposed action.
CONTACT: Courtney Scurria 916-746-1051 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-086 adopting impound fee for out-of-class electric bicycles and incorporating the fee into the schedule of User and Regulatory Fees.
Item dropped to be relisted on a future agenda.
20. Minutes of Prior Meetings (CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the minutes of the April 1, 2026, City Council Meeting.
CONTACT: Christine Mesaros 916-774-5287 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Approve the minutes of the April 1, 2026, City Council Meeting.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
VII. PRESENTATIONS/REPORTS
21. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1245 (IBEW) Successor Memorandum of Understanding and Salary Schedule Update (HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends the City Council approve a successor Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1245 (IBEW) for a term beginning April 18, 2026, to April 30, 2030. The cost to the Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-2026 budget will be $577,000, which has no impact on the General Fund. These costs will be covered by existing appropriations in the Environmental Utilities and Electric funds. The overall ongoing projected costs of salary and benefit increases over the MOU four-year term is $13.2 million. The total contract cost accounts for labor market adjustments and benefit costs in year 1 and compounded through the term of the MOU. The costing does not account for labor
market adjustments in years 2, 3, and 4 that will be presented to the City Council each respective year to remain competitive in the utility labor market.
CONTACT: Stacey Peterson 916-774-5374 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-098 approving a Successor Master Memorandum of Understanding for employees represented by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1245, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville; and b. Adopt Ordinance No. 7065 amending Ordinance 7020, the salary Ordinance for Personnel represented by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1245, as amended by appendix "A" to be effective April 18, 2026, as an urgency measure.
Human Resources Director Stacey Peterson made the presentation to the City Council.
No public comment received.
Motion by Councilmember Roccucci, seconded by Councilmember Houdesheldt, to adopt Resolution No. 26-098 approving a Successor Master Memorandum of Understanding for employees represented by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1245, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville; and adopt Ordinance No. 7065 amending Ordinance 7020, the salary Ordinance for Personnel represented by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1245, as amended by appendix "A" to be effective April 18, 2026, as an urgency measure. The motion passed.
Ayes: Vice Mayor Alvord, Councilmember Houdesheldt, Councilmember Roccucci.
Absent: Mayor Bernasconi, Councilmember Mendonsa.
22. Local Sales Tax Citizens' Oversight Committee - Report to the City Council (FINANCE
DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends Council receive an informational report and presentation from the Local Sales Tax Citizens’ Oversight Committee on the FY2024-25 revenue and expenditures of the Measure B sales and use tax.
CONTACT: Scott Pettingell 916-746-1306 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
This is an informational item and requires no City Council action.
Local Sales Tax Citizens' Oversight Committee Chairman Jordan Binnel made the presentation to the City Council.
No public comment received.
Item for informational only; No action required.
VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC: Public Hearing Process
City Council, when considering the matter, will take the following actions:
1. Open the Public Hearing
2. Presentation by staff
3. Presentation by applicant or appellant
4. Accept public testimony
5. Appellant or applicant rebuttal period
6. Close the Public Hearing
7. City Council comments and questions
8. City Council action
Any challenges in court about public hearing matters noticed on this agenda may be limited to only those issues, that were raised orally at the public hearing or in written form received by the City on or before the hearing.
Public Hearings listed for continuance will be continued and posting of this agenda will serve as notice of continuation.
23. Compliance with Assembly Bill 2561/Government Code Section 3502.3 Regarding Vacancies and Recruitment and Retention Efforts (HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends Council receive a presentation on AB 2561 which requires public agencies to hold at least one (1) public hearing per fiscal year to discuss vacancies, recruitment, and retention efforts. The presentation discusses the City's legal obligations under the law, which took effect January 1, 2025. This presentation is for informational purposes only regarding the status of the City’s vacancies and recruitment and retention efforts.
CONTACT: Macy Dippert 916-774-5215 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. This is an informational item and requires no City Council action.
Vice Mayor Alvord opened the public hearing at 6:32 P.M.
Human Resources Manager Macy Dippert made the presentation to the City Council.
No public comment received.
Vice Mayor Alvord closed the public hearing at 6:44 P.M.
Item for informational only; No action required.
24. 2026 Weed Abatement - Public Hearing (FIRE DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends Council adopt a resolution overruling all objections to the proposed abatement of all weeds, rubbish, dirt and/or rank growth, as well as ordering the Fire Chief to abate, or cause to be abated, the subject nuisances within the City of Roseville in accordance with the law. This item is the second and final step necessary to initiate the 2026 Weed Abatement Program. Owners of private parcels that are abated by the City are responsible for the costs associated with providing abatement services. A bill is sent to each property owner detailing the abatement costs, as well as an administrative fee. If the property owner fails to pay the bill, the City places a lien on the subject property and the monies owed are reimbursed through the property tax collection process.
CONTACT: Jordan Paul 916-774-5802 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-095 ordering the destruction or removal of all weeds, dirt, rubbish, and/or rank growths within the City of Roseville and overruling any and all objections thereto.
Vice Mayor Alvord opened the public hearing at 6:44 P.M.
Fire Chief Ryan Harrigan introduced Fire Division Chief Jordan Paul and Parks and Natural Resources Superintendent Eric Dexter.
Fire Division Chief Jordan Paul made the presentation.
Parks and Natural Resources Superintendent Eric Dexter continued the presentation.
Jennifer Chapman - Spoke on weed abatement in the creeks.
Vice Mayor Alvord closed the public hearing at 6:50 P.M.
Motion by Councilmember Houdesheldt, seconded by Councilmember Roccucci, to adopt Resolution No. 26-095 ordering the destruction or removal of all weeds, dirt, rubbish, and/or rank growths within the City of Roseville and overruling any and all objections thereto. The motion passed.
Ayes: Vice Mayor Alvord, Councilmember Houdesheldt, Councilmember Roccucci.
Absent: Mayor Bernasconi, Councilmember Mendonsa.
25. Adoption of User and Regulatory Fees (FINANCE DEPARTMENT) Summary: Staff recommends adopting the Schedule of User and Regulatory Fees, effective July 1, 2026. The City's Schedule of User and Regulatory Fees identifies fees for services and activities provided at the request of, or on behalf of, a single party, as opposed to the public at large. The Fee Schedule is intended to be reviewed annually, with staff conducting biennial studies to identify the City’s cost of providing fee-related services based on current labor rates and service delivery methods. The proposed fee schedule, effective July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2027, is based on the results of a User and Regulatory Fee Study completed in March 2026. The
anticipated annual revenue impact of the proposed changes included in the Fee Schedule update is approximately $485,000 citywide. It is important to note that while adjusting fees will provide a fiscal impact in the form of additional revenue, the revenue is not intended to fund new services; rather, it is intended to offset the costs of providing existing services that are recoverable from fees.
CONTACT: Jeannine Thrash 916-774-5473 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-096 adopting a Master Schedule of User and Regulatory Fees, effective July 1, 2026.
Vice Mayor Alvord opened the public hearing at 6:51 P.M.
Finance Director Scott Pettingell introduced Terry Madsen with ClearSouce Financial Consulting.
ClearSource President and Principal Consultant Terry Madsen made the presentation.
Finance Director Scott Pettingell continued the presentation.
No public comment received.
Vice Mayor Alvord closed the public hearing at 7:02 P.M.
Motion by Councilmember Houdesheldt, seconded by Councilmember Roccucci, to adopt Resolution No. 26-096 adopting a Master Schedule of User and Regulatory Fees, effective July 1, 2026. The motion passed.
Ayes: Vice Mayor Alvord, Councilmember Houdesheldt, Councilmember Roccucci.
Absent: Mayor Bernasconi, Councilmember Mendonsa.
26. Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act Hearing for Flyland Holdings LLC (FINANCE
DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends Council conduct a Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act Hearing (TEFRA Hearing) and approve the issuance of Bonds by the Public Finance Authority. A request was received for the City to conduct the public hearing, as the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the geographical location of the subject project. Flyland Holdings LLC (the “Borrower”) has requested that the Public Finance Authority, a Wisconsin commission and entity (the “PFA”) serve as the issuer of tax-exempt and/or taxable revenue bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $750,000,000 (the “Bonds”) for projects spanning multiple states, with portions of the proceeds financing project(s) within the City’s geographical jurisdiction not to exceed $11,000,000. The Bonds will be issued as limited obligations of the PFA, payable solely from revenues and receipts derived from a loan to be made by the PFA to the Borrower with the Bond proceeds. The City bears no liability with respect to the issuance of the Bonds and there is no fiscal impact to the City. Further, the City is not a party to any of the
financing documents related to the Bond issuance and is not named in any of the disclosure documents describing the Bonds or the proposed financing.
CONTACT: Jeannine Thrash 916-774-5473 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-097 approving the issuance of the Public Finance Authority Revenue Bonds, (Flyland Holdings LLC Obligated Group) series 2026 in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $750,000,000 and certain other matters relating thereto.
Vice Mayor Alvord opened the public hearing at 7:03 P.M.
Finance Director Scott Pettingell made the presentation to the City Council.
Jennifer Chapman inquired if the business owns the facility and where the source of money is from.
Vice Mayor Alvord closed the public hearing at 7:10 P.M.
Motion by Councilmember Roccucci, seconded by Councilmember Houdesheldt, to adopt Resolution No. 26-097 approving the issuance of the Public Finance Authority Revenue Bonds, (Flyland Holdings LLC Obligated Group) series 2026 in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $750,000,000 and certain other matters relating there-to. The motion passed.
Ayes: Vice Mayor Alvord, Councilmember Houdesheldt, Councilmember Roccucci.
Absent: Mayor Bernasconi, Councilmember Mendonsa.
IX. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the second opportunity to make a public comment on non-agenda items.
No public comment received.
X. STAFF/COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Roccucci reported on various community events.
Northern California Power Agency Meeting - Councilmember Roccucci reported on attendance.
Sites Reservoir Meeting - Councilmember Roccucci reported on attendance.
Placer County Water Agency Meeting - Councilmember Houdesheldt reported on attendance.
Sites Reservoir Meeting - Councilmember Houdesheldt reported on attendance.
Sacramento Area Council of Governments Meeting - Councilmember Houdesheldt reported on attendance.
Vice Mayor Alvord reported on various community events.
XI. ADJOURNMENT
Vice Mayor Alvord adjourned the meeting at 7:20 P.M.
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 5/6/2026
Item #: VII.32
File #: 0102-16
Item ID: 2026-296
Title: Council Discretionary Funds - Sober Grad Night
Contact: Heather Blanco 916-746-1171 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends City Council consider a sponsorship to four local high schools in the form of a discretionary fund donation for the Safe and Sober Grad Night events for this year’s graduating seniors.
The City Council has funded prior years’ requests for Safe and Sober Grad Night activities at $500 per school. The balance remaining in the Council Discretionary Funds for FY2025-26 is $6,821. City Council received the following requests for discretionary funding and can at this time discuss and consider each request for approval by motion.
• Roseville High School
• Woodcreek High School
• Oakmont High School
• West Park High School
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends City Council consider a sponsorship to four local high schools in the form of a discretionary fund donation for the Safe and Sober Grad Night events for this year’s graduating seniors.
The City Council has funded prior years’ requests for Safe and Sober Grad Night activities at $500 per school. The balance remaining in the Council Discretionary Funds for FY2025-26 is $6,821. The City Council has received the following requests for discretionary funding and can at this time discuss and consider each request for approval by motion.
• Roseville High School
• Woodcreek High School
• Oakmont High School
• West Park High School
BACKGROUND
The Citizens’ Benefit Fund was established in 1993 with the net proceeds from the sale of the Roseville Hospital. The City Council may, after receiving the recommendation of the Roseville Grants Advisory Commission, annually appropriate up to 90 percent of the annual earnings of the Citizens’ Benefit Fund for the purpose of improving the quality of life for the citizens of the City of Roseville. The City Council, without the recommendation of the Roseville Grants Advisory Commission, may annually appropriate a minor amount up to $15,000 of the annual earnings for the purpose of improving the quality of life in Roseville.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the City’s General Fund. Annually, the Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer allocates $15,000 of the annual earnings on the Citizens’ Benefit Fund per section 4.06.040 in the Municipal Code and includes it in the annual budget along with the Citizens’ Benefit Fund resources available for appropriation each year. These earnings are restricted for the purpose of improving the
quality of life for Roseville residents and appropriated by the City Council. The balance remaining in the Council’s Discretionary Funds for FY2025-26 is $6,821.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The award of funds meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
5. Support community engagement and advocacy
Respectfully Submitted,
Heather Blanco, Executive Assistant
Dennis Kauffman, Chief Financial Officer/Assistant City Manager ATTACHMENTS:
1. SGN Requests from Roseville, Woodcreek, Oakmont, and West Park HS REVIEWERS:
Heather Blanco, City Manager Department - City Manager Created/Initiated - 4/16/2026 Heather Blanco, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 4/16/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 4/22/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 4/22/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 4/22/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 4/23/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 4/23/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 4/23/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 4/24/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 4/27/2026
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 5/6/2026
Item #: VII.33
File #: 0800-03 & 0201
Item ID: 2026-231
Title: Roseville Electric - FY2026-27 Proposed Budget Update Contact: Joanna Cucchi 916-746-1609 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends that the City Council receive an update on the proposed FY2026-27 budget from Roseville Electric.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council receive an update on the proposed FY2026-27 budget from Roseville Electric.
BACKGROUND
This presentation is to provide an update on the proposed FY2026-27 budget for Roseville Electric.
FISCAL IMPACT
This is an informational item only and has no fiscal impact.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The budget update from Roseville Electric meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
2. Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world
Respectfully Submitted,
Joanna Cucchi, Electric Utility Financial Administrator Daniel Beans, Electric Utility Director
ATTACHMENTS:
REVIEWERS:
Nancy Rothlisberger, Finance Department - Budget Created/Initiated - 3/25/2026 Joanna Cucchi, Electric Department - Financial & Administrative Approved - 4/20/2026 Shawn Matchim, Electric Department - All Approved - 4/22/2026 Daniel Beans, Electric Department - All Approved - 4/22/2026
Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 4/22/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 4/22/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 4/23/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 4/23/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 4/24/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 4/24/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 4/27/2026
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 5/6/2026
Item #: VII.34
File #: 0800-02 & 0201
Item ID: 2026-269
Title: Environmental Utilities Department - FY2026-27 Proposed Budget Update Contact: Brian Craighead 916-774-5783 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends that the City Council receive an update on the proposed FY2026-27 budget for the Environmental Utilities Department.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council receive an update on the proposed FY2026-27 budget for the Environmental Utilities Department.
BACKGROUND
This presentation is to provide an update on the proposed FY2026-27 budget for the Environmental Utilities Department.
FISCAL IMPACT
This is an informational item only and has no fiscal impact.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The budget update from the Environmental Utilities Department meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
2. Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world
Respectfully Submitted,
Brian Craighead, Assistant Environmental Utilities Director Sean Bigley, Environmental Utilities Director
ATTACHMENTS:
REVIEWERS:
Nancy Rothlisberger, Finance Department - Budget Created/Initiated - 3/25/2026 Scott Pettingell, Finance Department Approved - 4/16/2026
Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 4/20/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 4/20/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 4/21/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 4/21/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 4/22/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 4/23/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 4/23/2026
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 5/6/2026
Item #: VII.35
File #: 0801 & 0201
Item ID: 2026-335
Title: Capital Improvement Program Proposed Budget Preview for Fiscal Year 2026-27 Contact: Lainie Anderson 916-774-5440 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff will give a presentation on the Capital Improvement Program proposed budget preview for Fiscal Year 2026-27.
RECOMMENDATION
This is an informational item. No action is required.
BACKGROUND
Staff will provide an overview of the significant capital improvement projects (CIP's) from all departments that are requesting funding for the coming fiscal year.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact from this presentation.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The Capital Improvement Program presentation meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
1. Ensure a safe and healthy community
2. Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world
3. Enhance economic vitality
4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth
5. Support community engagement and advocacy
6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Lainie Anderson, Administrative Assistant
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director
ATTACHMENTS:
REVIEWERS:
Lainie Anderson, Public Works Department - Administration Division Created/Initiated - 4/15/2026 Stefanie Kemen, Public Works Department - Administration Division Approved - 4/16/2026 Jason Shykowski, Public Works Department - All Approved - 4/17/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 4/20/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 4/20/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 4/21/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 4/21/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 4/22/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 4/22/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 4/22/2026
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 5/6/2026
Item #: VII.36
File #: 0206-08-01
Item ID: 2026-299
Title: 2026/2027 Landscaping and Lighting Districts Assessments - Initiate Proceedings, Intent to Levy, Approval of Engineer's Reports
Contact: Jeannine Thrash 916-774-5473 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of the engineer's annual levy reports for Fiscal Year 2026/2027 and ordering the levy and collection of assessments within the described Landscaping and Lighting Districts (individually "LLD" and collectively "LLDs"). The City currently has eight active LLDs. These districts were formed within the City to levy and collect assessments for maintenance of public improvements pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (Sections 22500, et seq.) and Article XIII D of the California Constitution. The districts are levied annually to fund landscape services in each LLD. There is no impact to the General Fund.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the following resolutions:
1. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Initiating Proceedings for the Annual Levy of Assessments for the Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2026/2027.
Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Declaring Its Intention to Levy Annual Assessments for the Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2026/2027.
Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Preliminary Approval of the Engineer's Annual Levy Report for the Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2026/2027.
2. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Initiating Proceedings for the Annual Levy of Assessments for the Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2026/2027.
Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Declaring Its Intention to Levy Annual Assessments for the Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2026/2027.
Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Preliminary Approval of the Engineer's Annual Levy Report for the Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2026/2027.
3. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Initiating Proceedings for the Annual Levy of Assessments for the Johnson Ranch Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2026/2027.
Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Declaring Its Intention to Levy Annual Assessments for the Johnson Ranch Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2026/2027.
Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Preliminary Approval of the Engineer's
Annual Levy Report for the Johnson Ranch Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2026/2027.
4. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Initiating Proceedings for the Annual Levy of Assessments for the North Central Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2026/2027.
Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Declaring Its Intention to Levy Annual Assessments for the North Central Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2026/2027.
Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Preliminary Approval of the Engineer's Annual Levy Report for the North Central Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2026/2027.
5. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Initiating Proceedings for the Annual Levy of Assessments for the Northwest Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2026/2027.
Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Declaring Its Intention to Levy Annual Assessments for the Northwest Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2026/2027.
Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Preliminary Approval of the Engineer's Annual Levy Report for the Northwest Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2026/2027.
6. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Initiating Proceedings for the Annual Levy of Assessments for the Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2026/2027.
Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Declaring Its Intention to Levy Annual Assessments for the Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2026/2027.
Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Preliminary Approval of the Engineer's Annual Levy Report for the Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2026/2027.
7. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Initiating Proceedings for the Annual Levy of Assessments for the Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2026/2027.
Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Declaring Its Intention to Levy Annual Assessments for the Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2026/2027.
Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Preliminary Approval of the Engineer's Annual Levy Report for the Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2026/2027.
8. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Initiating Proceedings for the Annual
Levy of Assessments for the Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2026/2027.
Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Declaring Its Intention to Levy Annual Assessments for the Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2026/2027.
Resolution of the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, Preliminary Approval of the Engineer's Annual Levy Report for the Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2026/2027.
Staff also recommends that June 3, 2026, at 6 p.m. be set as the date and time to hold the public hearing.
Each Engineer's Report submitted for the Public Hearing will include an affidavit signed by the Engineer.
The Engineer shall sign the affidavit for each following Council's preliminary approval of the Engineer's Reports.
BACKGROUND
The City of Roseville currently has eight active Landscaping and Lighting Districts (LLDs). These districts were formed within the City of Roseville to levy and collect assessments for maintenance of public improvements pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (Sections 22500, et seq.) and Article XIII D of the California Constitution.
The Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District was formed in 2006 to levy and collect assessments for the maintenance and operation of improvements benefiting parcels within the District. The cost of maintaining the streetscape improvements is spread equally to the subject properties, based on their percentage of total front footage of all affected parcels. The District is located in the Historic Old Town area in Downtown Roseville.
The Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District was formed in 1995 to levy and collect assessments for the maintenance of certain public improvements that benefit parcels within the District. The District is located in the Infill Plan area.
The Johnson Ranch Landscaping and Lighting District was formed in 1989 to levy and collect assessments for the maintenance of certain public landscape, open space, floodway and stream courses located within the Southeast Roseville Specific Plan area.
The Northwest Roseville Specific Plan Landscaping and Lighting District was formed in 1989 to fund the maintenance of public landscape medians and corridors, vernal pool preserves, bike trails, and certain park improvements. The district does not cover the entire Northwest Specific Plan area and only funds improvements within its established boundaries. In 2004, the Dunmore Junction subdivision was annexed into the district as Zone A, and the Legacy subdivision was annexed as Zone B. Unlike the majority of the other LLDs, this district does not include an inflationary escalator, and the annual assessment has remained unchanged since 1989. The City sought voter approval to increase the assessment and add an annual escalator in 2006, 2011, and 2021; however, these adjustments were not approved by property owners within the district, and the assessment remains unchanged.
The Olympus Pointe Landscaping and Lighting District was formed in 1989 to levy and collect assessments for the maintenance of certain public improvements within the Northeast Roseville Specific
Plan Area. In 2005, the property owners in the district approved, through a mailed ballot, an assessment increase and an annual escalation factor. This allows the City to keep pace with increasing maintenance costs.
The Riverside Avenue Landscaping and Lighting District was formed in 2007 to levy and collect assessments for the maintenance and operation of improvements benefiting parcels within the District. The cost of maintaining the streetscape improvements is spread equally to the subject properties, based on their percentage of the total front footage of all affected parcels.
The Vernon Street Landscaping and Lighting District was formed in 2001 to levy and collect assessments for maintenance of streetscape improvements within the district boundaries. The cost of maintaining the streetscape improvements is spread equally to the subject properties based on their percentage of total front footage of all affected parcels.
Assessment Statistics
FISCAL IMPACT
All charges are needed to fund landscape services in each LLD. There is no impact on the General Fund.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378.
Adoption of these resolutions meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
2. Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world
6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Jeannine Thrash, Management Analyst
Scott Pettingell, Finance Director
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution 26-122
2. Resolution 26-123
3. Resolution 26-124
4. 2026-27 Historic District LLD Engineers Report (IM)
5. Resolution 26-125
6. Resolution 26-126
7. Resolution 26-127
8. 2026-27 Infill LLD Engineers Report (IM)
9. Resolution 26-128
10. Resolution 26-129
11. Resolution 26-130
12. 2026-27 Johnson Ranch LLD Engineers Report (IM)
13. Resolution 26-131
14. Resolution 26-132
15. Resolution 26-133
16. 2026-27 North Central Roseville LLD Engineers Report (IM)
17. Resolution 26-134
18. Resolution 26-135
19. Resolution 26-136
20. 2026-27 Northwest Roseville LLD Engineers Report (IM)
21. Resolution 26-137
22. Resolution 26-138
23. Resolution 26-139
24. 2026-27 Olympus Pointe LLD Engineers Report (IM)
25. Resolution 26-140
26. Resolution 26-141
27. Resolution 26-142
28. 2026-27 Riverside Ave LLD Engineers Report (IM)
29. Resolution 26-143
30. Resolution 26-144
31. Resolution 26-145
32. 2026-27 Vernon St LLD Engineers Report (IM)
REVIEWERS:
Jeannine Thrash, Finance Department Created/Initiated - 4/14/2026 Scott Pettingell, Finance Department Approved - 4/17/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 4/21/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 4/22/2026
Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 4/23/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 4/23/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 4/24/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 4/24/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 4/27/2026
1 RESOLUTION NO. 26-122
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE,
CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF
ASSESSMENTS FOR THE HISTORIC DISTRICT LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026/2027, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF PART 2 OF DIVISION 15 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE The City Council of the City of Roseville, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the City Council has, by previous resolutions, formed the Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District (hereafter referred to as the “District”) pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, beginning with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the “Act”), which provides for the levy and collection of assessments by the County of Placer for the City of Roseville to pay for the maintenance and services of street lighting, landscaping, and all appurtenant facilities and operations related thereto; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services (hereafter “Engineer”) for the purpose of assisting with the establishment of the assessments, the annexation of territory, and the preparation and filing of an Engineer’s Annual Levy Report (hereafter referred to as the “Engineer’s Report”) with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act, and the California Constitution, Articles XIIIC and XIIID;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY
THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE HISTORIC DISTRICT LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1 Engineer’s Report: The City Council hereby orders the Engineer to prepare and file with the City Clerk the Engineer’s Report concerning the levy of assessments for the District in accordance with Chapter 3, Section 22622 of the Act.
Section 2 Proposed improvements and any substantial changes in existing improvements: The District improvements include: maintenance and operation of, and the furnishing of, services, materials and/or improvements for landscape, lighting, streetscape and hardscape areas, and other public improvements within the street rights-of-way and all appurtenant facilities related thereto as further described in the Engineer’s Report. The Engineer’s Report describes all new improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements.
2 RESOLUTION NO. 26-122
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS ___________ day of ___________, 2026. ____________________________________,
Mayor
City of Roseville
____________________________________,
City Clerk
City of Roseville
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF PLACER) ss.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE)
I, _______________________________, City Clerk of the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. ___________ was adopted by the City Council of said City of Roseville at a regular meeting of said council held on the __________ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
____________________________________,
City Clerk
City of Roseville
1 RESOLUTION NO.26-123
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE,
CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS
FOR THE HISTORIC DISTRICT LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FISCAL YEAR 2026/2027
The City Council of the City of Roseville, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the City Council has, by previous resolutions, formed the Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District (hereafter referred to as the “District”), and initiated proceedings for Fiscal Year 2026/2027, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, beginning with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the “Act”), which provides for the levy and collection of assessments by the County of Placer for the City of Roseville to pay for the maintenance, operation, and servicing of all improvements and facilities related thereto; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services for the purpose of assisting with the Annual Levy of the District and the preparation and filing of a report (hereinafter referred to as the “Engineer’s Report”) with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY
THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE HISTORIC DISTRICT LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3, SECTION 22624 OF THE ACT, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1 Intention: The City Council hereby declares that it is its intention to seek the Annual Levy of the District pursuant to the Act, over and including the land within the District boundary, and to levy and collect assessments on all such land to pay for the annual costs of the improvements.
Section 2 Proposed improvements and any substantial changes in existing improvements: The District improvements include: the maintenance and operation of, and the furnishing of, services, materials or improvements for landscape, lighting, streetscape and hardscape areas, including fencing, walls, signage, monuments, ground cover, shrubs, plants, irrigation systems, drainage systems, and other public improvements within the street right-of-way areas and all appurtenant facilities related thereto as further described in the Engineer’s Report. The Engineer’s Report also describes all new improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements.
2 Section 3 Boundaries and Designation: The boundaries of the District as previously defined in the formation documents of the original District. The District is known and designated as:
“Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District”
Section 4 Proposed Assessment Amounts: The proposed assessments are outlined in the Engineer’s Report. District Assessments are calculated in accordance with the method of apportionment established for the District and do not exceed the assessment rates and annual inflationary adjustment previously authorized by the City Council and approved by the property owners in accordance with the provisions of the California State Constitution, Article XIIID.
Section 5 Public Hearing: The City Council hereby declares its intention to conduct a Public Hearing annually concerning the levy of assessments for the District in accordance with Chapter 3, Section 22626 of the Act.
Section 6 Notice: The City Clerk shall give notice of the time and place of the Public Hearing by causing this resolution to be published once in the local newspaper not less than ten (10) days before the date of the hearing and by posting a copy of this resolution on the official bulletin board customarily used by the City Council for the posting of notices.
Section 7 Time and Place of Public Hearing: Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing on these matters will be held by the City Council on Wednesday, June 3, 2026, at 6:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as feasible in the regular meeting chambers located at 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, California.
3 RESOLUTION NO. 26-123
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS ___________ day of ___________, 2026. ____________________________________,
Mayor
City of Roseville
____________________________________,
City Clerk
City of Roseville
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF PLACER) ss.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE)
I, _______________________________, City Clerk of the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. ___________ was adopted by the City Council of said City of Roseville at a regular meeting of said council held on the __________ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
____________________________________,
City Clerk
City of Roseville
1 RESOLUTION NO. 26-124
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER’S ANNUAL
LEVY REPORT FOR THE HISTORIC DISTRICT LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FISCAL YEAR 2026/2027
The City Council of the City of Roseville, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the City Council has, by previous resolutions, ordered the preparation of an Annual Levy Report (hereafter referred to as the “Engineer’s Report”) for the district known and designated as the Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District (hereafter referred to as the “District”), pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, beginning with Section 22500 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”); and
WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services (hereinafter “Engineer”), for the purpose of assisting with the establishment of the assessments and the preparation and filing of an Engineer’s Report with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act and the requirements of the California Constitution, Articles XIIIC and XIIID; and WHEREAS, there has now been presented to this City Council the Engineer’s Report as required by Chapter 1, Article 4, Section 22566 of said Act; and WHEREAS, this City Council has carefully examined and reviewed the Engineer’s Report as presented, and is preliminarily satisfied with the District and with each of the budget items and documents set forth therein, and further finds that the assessments, on a preliminary basis, have been spread in accordance with the benefits received from the improvements, operation, maintenance, and services to be performed within the District, as set forth in said Engineer’s Report; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY THE
CITY COUNCIL FOR THE HISTORIC DISTRICT LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1 That the above recitals are all true and correct.
Section 2 That the Engineer’s Report, as presented, consists of the following:
a. A Description of Improvements
b. The Annual Budget (Costs and Expenses of Maintenance, Services, Operations, and District Administration)
c. The Assessment Roll containing the Fiscal Year 2026/2027 Levy for each Assessor Parcel within the District
2 Section 3 The Engineer’s Report is hereby approved on a preliminary basis and ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open to public inspection.
Section 4 The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, and the minutes of this meeting shall reflect the presentation of the Engineer’s Report.
3 RESOLUTION NO. 26-124
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS ___________ day of ___________, 2026. ____________________________________,
Mayor
City of Roseville
____________________________________,
City Clerk
City of Roseville
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF PLACER) ss.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE)
I, _______________________________, City Clerk of the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. ___________ was adopted by the City Council of said City of Roseville at a regular meeting of said Council held on the __________ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
____________________________________,
City Clerk
City of Roseville
27368 Via Industria
Suite 200
Temecula, CA 92590
T 951.587.3500 | 800.755.6864
F 951.587.3510
www.willdan.com
City of Roseville
Historic District
Landscaping and Lighting District
FY 2026/27 ENGINEER’S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT
Intent Meeting: May 6, 2026
Public Hearing: June 3, 2026
ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
Establishment of Annual Rates and Charges for the:
Historic District
Landscaping and Lighting District
City of Roseville
Placer County, State of California
This Report describes the District and any relevant zones therein, including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for Fiscal Year 2026/27 as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention.
Reference is hereby made to the Placer County Assessor’s maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council.
Dated this ______day of ________, 2026.
Willdan Financial Services
Assessment Engineer
On Behalf of the City of Roseville
By: ________________________________
Mickey Ashley
Project Manager
District Administration Services
By: ________________________________
Tyrone Peter
PE # C 81888
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. OVERVIEW .....................................................................................................1 A. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................1 B. COMPLIANCE WITH THE CURRENT LEGISLATION.................................2 C. DESCRIPTION OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES...............................................2 D. IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED BY THE 1972 ACT .................................2 E. DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS AND MAINTENANCE...........4 II. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT...................................................................6 A. GENERAL ............................................................................................................6 B. BENEFIT ANALYSIS..........................................................................................6 C. DESCRIPTION OF THE METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT .......................9 D. ANNUAL INFLATIONARY ADJUSTMENT...................................................11 III. DISTRICT BUDGET......................................................................................12 A. FY 2026/27 BUDGET.......................................................................................12 B. FY 2026/27 ASSESSMENT RATES..............................................................13 C. FY 2026/27 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION............................................13 D. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS ............................................................14 E. REHABILITATION RESERVE – CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN.........19 APPENDIX A – DISTRICT BOUNDARY MAP ........................................................20 APPENDIX B — FY 2026/27 ASSESSMENT ROLL...............................................23
FY 2026/27 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 1 I. OVERVIEW
A. INTRODUCTION
The City of Roseville (“City”) annually levies and collects special assessments in order to maintain the improvements within the Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District (“District”). The District was formed on April 5, 2006 and is levied annual assessments pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (“1972 Act”).
The Engineer’s Report (“Report”) describes the District, any new annexations, changes to the District, and the proposed assessments for the period of July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2027. The special benefit assessments are based on historical and estimated costs to maintain the District improvements. These assessments, which provide a direct and special benefit to properties within the District, will provide funding for the operation and maintenance of District improvements.
The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessor’s Parcel Number (“APN”) by the Placer County Assessor’s Office. The Placer County Auditor/Controller uses Assessor’s Parcel Numbers and specific Tax Code Accounts, to identify on the County’s tax roll, properties assessed for special district benefit assessments.
Following approval of the Report, the City Council will by resolution order the improvements to be made and confirm the levy and collection of assessments herein pursuant to the 1972 Act. The assessment rates and method of apportionment described in this Report as approved or modified by the City Council define the assessments to be applied to each parcel within the District for Fiscal Year (“FY”) 2026/27. The assessments as approved will be submitted to the Placer County Auditor/Controller to be included on the property tax roll for each parcel.
If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the Current Fiscal Year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel numbers will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel or parcels shall be based on the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved by the City Council.
FY 2026/27 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 2 B. COMPLIANCE WITH THE CURRENT LEGISLATION
The City Council, pursuant to the provisions of the “Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972”, being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, beginning with Section 22500 (the “1972 Act”); Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California (“Article XIIID”); and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act, beginning with Government Code Section 53750 (the “Implementation Act”) (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the “Assessment Law”) initiated proceedings for the formation of the District on February 15, 2006 and to levy and collect annual assessments against lots and parcels within the District for FY 2006/07. On April 5, 2006, pursuant to Assessment Law, the City conducted a Public Hearing and tabulated the returned ballots. The City determined that a majority protest did not exist and approved the District’s maximum assessment rate and annual inflationary adjustment factor.
Pursuant to the 1972 Act, an annual Public Hearing is conducted by the City Council to accept property owner and public comments, to review the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report prior to approving the annual assessments to be levied on the County tax rolls. The assessments described in this Report have been prepared in accordance with the 1972 Act and Assessment Law.
C. DESCRIPTION OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
The territory within the District consists of all lots, parcels and subdivisions of land as shown on the Boundary Map titled “Boundary Map of Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District” as referenced in Appendix A-1 of this Report.
The District is located within the City’s Historic Old Town, west of Highway 80, south of Pleasant Street, north and east of Washington Boulevard, and north and west of the Union Pacific Railroad. The District consists of mostly commercial parcels in a concentrated area of the Downtown primarily fronting the following streets: Church Street northeast of Washington Boulevard, Main Street between Washington Boulevard and Lincoln Street, Pacific Street and Lincoln Street where the improvements end approximately one block south of Pleasant Street.
D. IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED BY THE 1972 ACT
As applicable or may be applicable to a proposed District, the 1972 Act defines improvements to mean one or any combination of the following:
• The installation or planting of landscaping.
• The installation or construction of statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities.
• The installation or construction of public lighting facilities. • The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal
FY 2026/27 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 3 of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities. • The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing. • The acquisition of any existing improvement otherwise authorized pursuant to this section.
Incidental expenses associated with the improvements including, but not limited to:
The cost of preparation of the report, including plans, specifications, estimates, diagram, and assessment;
• The costs of printing, advertising, and the publishing, posting, and mailing of notices;
• Compensation payable to the County for collection of assessments; • Compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services; • Any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing of the improvements;
• Any expenses incidental to the issuance of bonds or notes pursuant to Section 22662.5.
• Costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or increased assessment.
The 1972 Act defines "Maintain" or "maintenance" to mean furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including:
• Repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. • Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury.
• The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste. • The cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.
Furthermore, the 1972 Act specifies that where the cost of improvements (other than maintenance and operations) is greater than can be conveniently raised from a single annual assessment, an assessment to be levied and collected in annual installments. In that event, the governing body may choose to do any of the following:
• Provide for the accumulation of the moneys in an improvement fund until there are sufficient moneys to pay all or part of the cost of the improvements. • Provide for a temporary advance to the improvement fund from any available and unencumbered funds of the local agency to pay all or part of
FY 2026/27 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 4 the cost of the improvements and collect those advanced moneys from the annual installments collected through the assessments.
• Borrow an amount necessary to finance the estimated cost of the proposed improvements. The amount borrowed, including amounts for bonds issued to finance the estimated cost of the proposed improvements.
E. DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS AND MAINTENANCE
The District, through the levy of special assessments, provides funding for ongoing maintenance, operation and servicing of landscaping and lighting improvements located within the public rights-of-ways and dedicated easements located within the District. These improvements may include, but are not limited to, all materials, equipment, utilities, labor, and appurtenant facilities related to the ongoing maintenance of the improvements. Maintenance services will be provided by City personnel and/or private contractors. The proposed improvements to be maintained and services are generally described as follows:
Landscaping Improvements
The landscaping improvements have been designed to enhance the area within the District and may include, but are not limited to ground cover, shrubs and plants, trees, irrigation and drainage systems, trash receptacles, ornamental lighting, masonry walls or other fencing, hardscape improvements, monuments and landmarks, recreational facilities and associated appurtenances located within the street rights-of-way and public areas within the District. Specifically, the proposed landscape improvement areas for this District are:
• Parkway landscaping and hardscape improvements within the public right of ways of the streets within the district including, but not limited to, Lincoln Street, Main Street, Church Street, Pacific Street, and the northeast side of Washington Boulevard estimated at 14,450 square feet of landscaping; • Various amenities associated with the landscape improvements and public areas within the District, including, but not limited to, trash receptacles, street furniture, bike racks, entry signs, sidewalks, fencing, and retaining walls.
Specifically, not included as District improvements are those improvements located on private property, improvements and facilities that are outside the boundaries of the District and/or are funded by other sources available to the City, including those portions of the median and parkway landscaping on Washington Boulevard (southwest side of the street) that are outside the District boundaries.
FY 2026/27 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 5 Public Lighting Improvements
The lighting improvements may include, but are not limited to, the cost of providing, maintaining, and servicing of lighting fixtures, poles, meters, conduits, electrical cable, and associated appurtenant facilities associated with:
• Lighting facilities within the landscaped areas and public areas including safety lights, security lights or ornamental lights installed as part of the District improvements; and
• Public street light improvements located on the streets within the District.
Specifically excluded from the assessment are the street light energy costs. These costs will continue to be paid for by the City from other revenue sources.
Detailed maps of the locations and descriptions of the specific improvements to be maintained by the District are on file in the Office of Public Works and by reference are made part of this Report.
Description of Maintenance and Services
Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of landscaping and street lighting improvements facilities and appurtenant facilities, including repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the landscaping and street lighting improvements, or appurtenant facilities; providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of landscaping improvements including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, mowing, spraying, fertilizing and treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste; and the cleaning sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.
Servicing means the furnishing of water and electricity for the irrigation of the landscape improvements or appurtenant facilities and the furnishing of electric current or energy for the operation of the landscaping improvements or appurtenant facilities. The street lighting improvements shall be maintained to provide adequate illumination; however, the City will be paying the actual energy costs to provide illumination.
FY 2026/27 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 6 II. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
A. GENERAL
The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping, and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value:
“The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.”
The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the Improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on estimated benefit to each parcel.
B. BENEFIT ANALYSIS
In conjunction with the provisions of the 1972 Act, the California Constitution Article XIIID addresses several key criteria for the levy of assessments, notably:
Article XIIID Section 2d defines District as follows:
“District means an area determined by an agency to contain all parcels which will receive a special benefit from a proposed public improvement or property-related service”;
Article XIIID Section 2i defines Special Benefit as follows:
“Special benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large.
General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit.” Article XIIID Section 4a defines proportional special benefit assessments as follows:
“An agency which proposes to levy an assessment shall identify all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed. The proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of a public improvement, the maintenance and operation expenses of a public improvement, or the cost of the property related service being provided. No assessment shall be
FY 2026/27 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 7 imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel.”
This District was formed to establish and provide for the improvements that enhance the presentation of the surrounding properties and developments. These improvements will directly benefit the parcels to be assessed within the District.
The assessments and method of apportionment is based on the premise that the assessments will be used to construct and install landscape and lighting improvements within the District as well as provide for the annual maintenance of those improvements, and the assessment revenues generated by District will be used solely for such purposes.
The costs of the proposed improvements have been identified and allocated to properties within the District based on special benefit. The improvements to be provided by this District and for which properties will be assessed have been identified as an essential component and local amenity that provides a direct reflection and extension of the properties within the District which the property owners and residents have expressed a high level of support.
The method of apportionment (method of assessment) set forth in the Report is based on the premise that each assessed property receives special benefits from the landscape and lighting improvements within the District, and the assessment obligation for each parcel reflects that parcel’s proportional special benefits as compared to other properties that receive special benefits.
To identify and determine the proportional special benefit to each parcel within the District, it is necessary to consider the entire scope of the improvements provided as well as the properties that benefit from those improvements. The improvements and the associated costs described in this Report have been carefully reviewed and have been identified and allocated based on a benefit rationale and calculations that proportionally allocate the net cost of only those improvements determined to be of special benefit to properties within the District. The various public improvements and the associated costs have been identified as either “general benefit” (not assessed) or “special benefit”.
The City initiated and conducted property owner protest ballot proceedings in accordance with Article XIIID. Each of the proposed Improvements, the associated costs and assessments were identified and allocated based on special benefit pursuant to the provisions of Article XIIID and 1972 Act. Additionally, the Improvements and the annual costs of ensuring the maintenance and operation of the Improvements are of direct and special benefit to the properties.
The City annually levies and collects special benefit assessments in order to maintain and service the District Improvements. The District provides for specific Improvements and services that include the maintenance and operation of landscaping and lighting Improvements and associated appurtenances located within the District’s public rights-of-way and dedicated easements. The annual
FY 2026/27 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 8 assessment is based on the historical and estimated costs to maintain the Improvements that provide a benefit to properties within these Districts. The Improvements within the District and the costs of those Improvements are identified and budgeted separately, including all expenditures, deficits, surpluses, revenues, and reserves.
All Improvements within the District and the properties associated with those Improvements were reviewed for benefit prior to the formation of the District.
Because the Improvements affront the benefited parcels, it has been determined that there is no measurable general benefit to properties outside the District or to the public at large. In making this determination it should be noted that similar improvements within California are typically maintained by individual property owners, through some type of association or a special district as allowed by State Law since the on-going maintenance of these improvements are a special benefit to the properties associated with those improvements.
The method of apportionment (method of assessment) for the District is based on the premise that each of the assessed parcels within the District receives special benefit from the Improvements maintained and financed by District assessments.
The presence of these Improvements and the close proximity of the Improvements to the properties within the District enhance the desirability and security of properties within the District.
The landscape Improvements provided by the District may include landscaped parkways, perimeters, entryways, local medians, slopes, internal amenities and appurtenant facilities. Street lighting Improvements may include all energy costs and necessary maintenance to the facilities related thereto. The annual assessments outlined in this Report are proposed to cover the estimated costs to provide all necessary service, operation, administration, and maintenance required to keep these Improvements in a healthy, vigorous, and satisfactory condition. The special benefits associated with the local landscaping Improvements are specifically:
The special benefits associated with all landscaping Improvements are specifically:
• Enhanced desirability of properties through association with the Improvements. • Improved aesthetic appeal of properties providing a positive representation of the area and properties.
• Enhanced adaptation of the urban environment within the natural environment from adequate landscaping.
• Environmental enhancement through improved dust and debris control, and fire prevention.
• Increased sense of pride in ownership of property within the District resulting from well-maintained Improvements associated with the properties.
FY 2026/27 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 9 • Enhanced quality of life through well-maintained landscaped areas. • Reduced criminal activity and property-related crimes (especially vandalism) against properties in the District through well-maintained surroundings and amenities including abatement of graffiti.
• Enhanced environmental quality of the parcels by moderating temperatures, providing oxygenation and attenuating noise.
The special benefits of street lighting are the convenience, safety, and security of property, improvements, and goods. Specifically:
• Enhanced deterrence of crime and the aid to police protection. • Increased nighttime safety on streets and roads within the Districts. • Improved ability of pedestrians and motorists to see. • Improved ingress and egress to property.
• Reduced vandalism and other criminal acts and damage to Improvements or property.
• Improved traffic circulation and reduced nighttime accidents and personal property loss.
• Increased promotion of business during nighttime hours in the case of commercial properties.
All of the preceding special benefits contribute to a specific enhancement and desirability of each of the assessed parcels within the District.
C. DESCRIPTION OF THE METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
To establish the special benefit to the individual parcels within the District a formula that spreads the costs of the maintenance based on the special benefit must be established. The improvements have been reviewed and the following formula has been established to apportion the maintenance costs based on benefit.
For purposes of the Assessment Methodology, the terms hereinafter set forth have been the following meanings:
Acreage means the land area of an Assessor’s Parcel as shown on an Assessor’s Parcel map-, or if the land area is not shown on an Assessor’s parcel map, the land area shown on the applicable final map, parcel map, condominium plan, record of survey or other recorded document creating and describing such area of land.
Multi-Family Residential means a residence for which building permits have been issued for attached residential units for rental purposes.
FY 2026/27 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 10 Single-Family Residential Unit means a single residential home. This land use includes detached or attached for sale units intended for single-family occupancy.
Commercial means property being used or zoned for either commercial or industrial use.
Three components were used in the methodology to determine each parcels assessment; 1) Front footage of parcels along the proposed street improvements; 2) acreage of benefiting parcels; and 3) Current land use of parcels. Based on these three components the assessments were determined as follows:
First, the parcels Front Footage was determined based on Assessor’s Parcel maps or other sources. Only Front footage on streets that will be improved was used.
For parcels with Front Footage on more than one side (corner lots), the total Front Footage was divided by two to provide an average Front Footage. It was determined that twenty percent (20%) of the total budget was reasonably attributed to Front Footage; therefore twenty percent (20%) of the budget was spread to Front Footage.
Second, each parcel’s Acreage was calculated based on Assessors Parcels map.
It was determined that eighty percent (80%) of the budget was reasonably attributed to Acreage; therefore eighty (80%) of the budget was spread on Acreage. In the event that common area parcels are created subsequent to the formation of the District, the acreage of any such common area parcels shall be apportioned to the remaining assessable parcels of the subdivision and/or parcel split(s) related to the creation of the common area parcel(s).
Third, the current land use of the parcel was determined using the County’s secured roll. Parcels currently used as a Single-Family Residence or Multi-Family Residences were determined to receive twenty-five (25%) of the benefit in relation to commercial parcels. Additionally, it was determined that single Family Residential Parcels benefit equally from the improvements, therefore the total assessment calculated based on the formula was averaged between the five Single Family Residential parcels to determine a Single-Family Residential rate per Unit.
The base year maximum assessment rates approved to be levied in FY 2006/07 are provided in the table below.
Base Year (FY 2006/07)
Maximum Assessment Rates
Land Use Front Footage Acreage Rate Flat Rate
Commercial $1.99 per Front Foot $2,582.41 per Acre N/A
Multi-Family Residential $0.50 per Front Foot $645.60 per Acre N/A Single-Family Residential N/A N/A $132.00 per Unit
FY 2026/27 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 11 The following formula is used to calculate each parcel’s assessment (proportional benefit) for those parcels that are not Single-Family Residential parcels.
Front Footage Rate x Parcel’s Adjusted Front Footage = Parcel Front Footage Levy Acreage Rate x Parcel’s Adjusted Acreage = Parcel Acreage Levy Proposed Levy per Parcel = Parcel Front Footage Levy + Parcel Acreage Levy The Assessment Range Formula shall be applied to all future assessments within the District beginning in fiscal year 2007/08. Generally, if the proposed annual assessment for the current fiscal year is less than or equal to the calculated Maximum Assessment, then the Assessment is equal to the initial Assessment (approved by property owners within the District) adjusted annually by three percent (3%).
Beginning in the second fiscal year (Fiscal Year 2007/08) and each fiscal year thereafter, the Maximum Assessment would be recalculated, and a new Maximum Assessment established within the District.
The Maximum Assessment is adjusted annually and is calculated independent of the District’s annual budget and proposed annual assessment. Any proposed annual assessment is not considered an increased assessment, even if the proposed assessment is greater than the assessment applied in the prior fiscal year.
Although the Maximum Assessment will increase each year, the actual assessment may remain unchanged. The Maximum Assessment adjustment is designed to establish a reasonable limit on assessments. The Maximum Assessment calculated each year does not require or facilitate an increase to the annual assessment and neither does it restrict assessments to the adjustment maximum amount. If the budget and assessment for the fiscal year do not require an increase, or the increase is less than the adjusted Maximum Assessment, the required budget and assessment may be applied without additional property owner balloting. If the budget and assessments calculated requires an increase greater than the adjusted Maximum Assessment, then the assessment is considered an increased assessment and would be subject to balloting.
D. ANNUAL INFLATIONARY ADJUSTMENT
If the proposed assessment rates increase over the prior fiscal year’s maximum assessment rates by a percentage no greater than the 3%, then the proposed assessment rates are not considered an increase.
FY 2026/27 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 12 III. DISTRICT BUDGET
A. FY 2026/27 BUDGET
Fund balance information is reported in Section C on the following page.
FY 2026/27 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 13 B. FY 2026/27 ASSESSMENT RATES
C. FY 2026/27 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION
FY 2026/27 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 14 D. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS
Description of the terms used in the preceding Budget, Assessment Rates and Fund Balance tables are listed below:
BUDGET:
DIRECT COSTS
Contract Maintenance - Landscaping - Includes all regularly scheduled contract labor, required to properly maintain and ensure the satisfactory condition of all landscaping, irrigation and drainage systems and appurtenant facilities.
Repair and Maintenance - Landscaping - This item includes landscape improvement repair and maintenance costs that are generally unforeseen and not normally included in the annual maintenance contract costs. This may include repair of damaged amenities due to vandalism, storms, etc. Planned replacements or upgrades that provide a direct benefit to the District during the Current Fiscal Year may also be included. Costs could include the renovation of improvements such as irrigation systems.
Repair and Maintenance - Lighting - This item includes lighting improvement repair and maintenance costs. This may include repair of damaged amenities due to vandalism, storms, etc. Planned replacements or upgrades that provide a direct benefit to the District during the Current Fiscal Year may also be included.
Repair and Maintenance - Streetscape and Signage - This item includes repair and maintenance costs of streetscape and sign improvements. Streetscape improvements include street furniture, sidewalks, curbs, gutters, parking stripes, brick pavers, benches, bike racks, and trash receptacles. This may include repair of damaged amenities due to vandalism, storms, etc. May include planned replacements or upgrades not listed below that provide a direct benefit to the District.
Repair & Maintenance – Tree Work - This line item includes annual costs for tree maintenance not included in the annual contract maintenance portion of the budget. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.
Utilities - The furnishing of water and electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the improvements.
Rehab Reserve Expenditures - Non-Routine Tree Work – Expected costs to maintain trees other than costs of annual repair and maintenance. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.
Rehab Reserve Project Expenditures – Expected costs for installation, replacement or planned upgrades of District improvements for the current year that
FY 2026/27 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 15 were previously funded or accumulated in the Rehabilitation Reserve. The Rehabilitation Reserve is used to accumulate funds for costs associated with the future rehabilitation or replacement of District improvements that cannot be conveniently raised from a single year’s assessment. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.
ADMINISTRATION COSTS
City Administration – Estimated costs incurred by the City Finance Department and other departments in preparing the annual budget for the Engineer’s Report, together with other financial information required to determine the annual assessment. These costs would also include the preparation, posting and publishing of public notices required for City Council action relating to the District, as well as the costs to perform legal review of documents.
Contract Administration – Parks Dept – Estimated Costs of the Parks, Recreation and Libraries Department (“Parks Department”) to coordinate and oversee the maintenance contracts and overall repair and maintenance of the District. This amount also includes the cost of the Parks Department’s estimates and analysis of certain budget items, estimated costs and useful lives of certain District Improvements.
County Auditor Fees - A fee of 1% of the total levy amount that is charged to the District by the County for placing assessments on property tax bills.
Consulting and Professional Services – Includes the costs and expenses of contracting with various professionals to provide legal, engineering and district administration services directly related to the District, including the calculation of the annual assessment amounts, the preparation of the Engineer’s’ Report.
Public Hearing Publishing Costs –Includes the out of pocket costs to publish public notices required for City Council action relating to the District.
Total Direct and Administration Costs – The total expected costs of the District.
BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS
Replenishment/(Use) of Operating Reserve – A “Replenishment” increases the levy in order to replenish the Operating Reserve. On the other hand, a “Use” of the Operating Reserve decreases the levy by drawing funds from the Operating Reserve for current year expenditures. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget. Further information regarding the function of the Operating Reserve is provided under “FUND BALANCE INFORMATION” in the following pages of this Section.
FY 2026/27 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 16 Contribution for / (Use of) Rehab Reserve — A “Contribution” increases the levy in order to generate funding for the Rehabilitation Reserve. This reserve allows for the accumulation of funds for possible rehabilitation projects or replacements in future years. On the other hand, a “Use of” of the Rehabilitation Reserve provides current year funding of rehabilitation projects or replacements from available funds within the Rehabilitation Reserve. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget. Further information regarding the function of the Rehabilitation Reserve is provided under “FUND BALANCE INFORMATION” in the following pages of this Section.
Rounding Adjustment – The necessary rounding adjustment(s) due to limitations of the County property tax system that requires even penny levy amounts to be placed on the secured tax roll.
BALANCE TO LEVY - This is the total amount to be levied and collected through assessments for the current fiscal year for each zone. The Balance to Levy represents the sum of the total District costs together with any applicable adjustments to the budget as described above.
ASSESSMENT RATES:
Number of Assessable Parcels - The total number of parcels that are expected to be assessed. Non-assessable lots or parcels include government-owned land, public utility-owned property, land principally encumbered by public rights-of-way or easements, common areas, and/or parcels within the boundaries of the District currently do not benefit from the improvements and are therefore not assessed.
Total Assessable Front Footage – the total number of Front Feet within the District, adjusted for corner parcels, Multi-Family Residential and Single-Family Residential Parcels will be assessed as calculated in accordance with the methodology set out in Section C of this Report.
Total Assessable Acreage – the total Acreage within the District, adjusted for Multi-Family Residential and Single-Family Residential Parcels that will be assessed as calculated in accordance with the methodology set out in Section C of this Report.
Total Single-Family Residential Parcels – the total number of parcels currently being used as Single-Family Residences.
Applied Assessment Rates – The applied assessment rates for each of the District’s land use types.
Maximum Assessment Rates per Front Foot – The maximum dollar amount that can be assessed per Adjusted Front Foot for the District’s land use type for the current fiscal year.
FY 2026/27 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 17 Maximum Assessment Rates per Acre – The maximum dollar amount that can be assessed per Adjusted Acreage Foot for the District’s land use type for the current fiscal year.
Maximum Assessment Rate per SF Residential Unit – The maximum dollar amount that can be assessed per Single Family Unit within the District for the current fiscal year.
Potential Maximum Assessment – The total amount that is expected to be assessed against all parcels within the District for the Current Fiscal Year.
FUND BALANCE INFORMATION:
OPERATING RESERVE
Beginning Operating Reserve Balance 7-1-2026 (est.) - The anticipated beginning balance of cash and receivables net of any unpaid prior year obligations for each Zone. These beginning balances shall be used to fund each Zone’s expenditures from July 1, 2026 to December 31, 2026, as the Operating Reserve is required to compensate for the approximate six-month delay between the start of the District’s fiscal year and the receipt of the collections from the County. All Rehabilitation Reserve balances, if any, are excluded from the Operating Reserve balances and shall be shown separately in the Report.
Replenish from FY 2026/27 Levy – This amount is added to the FY 2026/27 levy in order to replenish the Operating Reserve. Due to the six-month delay from the District’s receipt of assessment collections, the Operating Reserve balance shall be sufficiently funded to provide for expenditures from July 1, 2026 (the beginning of the Fiscal Year) through December 31, 2026. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.
Use for FY 2026/27 Expenses – The amount of the Operating Reserve to be used to fund FY 2026/27 expenses. Portions of the Operating Reserve may be slated for current year expenditures in order to reduce the Ending Operating Reserve Balance to an amount no greater than the expected District costs for the period of July 1, 2026 (the beginning of the Fiscal Year) through December 31, 2026. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.
Transfer from/(to) the Rehab Reserve — The amount of Operating Reserve monies to be transferred to or from the Rehabilitation Reserve. Periodically, funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve may be needed to respond to changing maintenance needs of the improvements or other factors. Accordingly, any or all funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve are subject to transfer into the same zone’s Operating Reserve, at the discretion of the Parks Department, in order to provide
FY 2026/27 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 18 for the maintenance and operation of the improvements. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.
Ending Operating Reserve Balance 6-30-2027 (est.) - This amount represents the anticipated Operating Reserve balance/(deficit) for each Zone as of June 30, 2027. The size of each Zone’s Operating Reserve is limited by Streets and Highways Code 22569 which states that an Operating Reserve shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance, service and incidental expenses from the first day of the fiscal year (July 1) to the date that the Agency expects to receive the first apportionment of collections from the County, which is estimated to be December 31. Therefore, each Zone may retain an Operating Reserve amounting to the District’s first six-months of expenses in order to meet ongoing obligations until the first collections are received from the County. All Rehabilitation Reserve balances, if any, are excluded from the Operating Reserve balances and shall be shown separately in the Report.
REHABILITATION RESERVE
Beginning Rehab Reserve Balance 7-1-2026 (est.) — The projected balance of funds in the Rehabilitation Reserve as of July 1, 2026. Streets and Highways Code 22660 allows the District to generate and accumulate funds over several years to fund District improvements that cannot be conveniently raised from a single year’s assessment.
Collect from FY 2026/27 Levy — This amount is added to the FY 2026/27 levy to accumulate funding of future year rehabilitation projects, replacements, restorations or upgrades of District improvements. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.
Use for FY 2026/27 Rehab Projects – The amount of Rehabilitation Reserve monies expected to be transferred out of the Rehabilitation Reserve to fund the costs of installation, replacement or planned upgrades of District improvements for the current year. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.
Transfer from/(to) the Operating Reserve — The amount of Rehabilitation Reserve monies to be transferred to or from the Operating Reserve. Periodically, funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve may be needed to respond to changing maintenance needs of the improvements or other factors. Accordingly, any or all funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve are subject to transfer into the same zone’s Operating Reserve, at the discretion of the Parks Department, in order to provide for the maintenance and operation of the improvements. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the budget.
Ending Rehab Reserve Balance 6-30-2027 (est.) - The projected balance of funds in the Rehabilitation Reserve as of June 30, 2027. These funds shall be used to provide for future year rehabilitation projects, replacements, restorations or
FY 2026/27 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 19 upgrades of District improvements which cannot be conveniently raised from a single year’s assessment.
Should the District have no Rehabilitation Reserve balances or related activity, no Rehabilitation Reserve information shall be presented in the Report.
E. REHABILITATION RESERVE – CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Streets and Highways Code 22660 allows the District to generate and accumulate funds over several years to fund District improvements that cannot be conveniently raised from a single year’s assessment.
The Report provides a five-year Capital Improvement Plan (“CIP”) which shows projected expenditures related to the rehabilitation, restoration and/or replacement of District improvements, and other allowable costs. The Current Fiscal Year CIP is shown in the preceding Budget Section A. The projected CIP costs for the remaining four years are provided below.
Description
FY
2027-28
FY
2028-29
FY
2029-30
FY
2030-31
4 Year
Total
Repair, replace and/or refurbish street furniture (pots) $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $12,000 Repair, replace streetscape and hardscape 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000 6,800 Replace, repair, renovate and/or refurbish plants, landscape & related mat'ls 2,900 3,100 3,300 2,501 11,801
Replace, repair lighting fixtures 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 8,000 Non-routine tree work 3,023 3,114 3,207 3,303 12,647
Total Projected Expenditures $12,323 $12,814 $13,307 $12,804 $51,248 From time to time, funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve may be needed to respond to changing needs due to the condition of the improvements or other factors. Accordingly, any or all funds held in a Rehabilitation Reserve are subject to transfer into the Districts’ Operating Reserve, at the discretion of the Parks Department, in order to provide for the maintenance and/or operation of the improvements.
FY 2026/27 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 20 APPENDIX A – DISTRICT BOUNDARY MAP
The boundary map for the District has previously been submitted to the Clerk of the City in the format required under the 1972 Act and is, by reference, hereby made part of this Report. These District Boundary Maps are available for inspection at the office of the City Clerk during normal business hours.
For general reference purposes, a summary of the District’s Boundaries is presented herein.
FY 2026/27 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 21
FY 2026/27 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 22
FY 2026/27 Historic District Landscaping and Lighting District Page 23 APPENDIX B — FY 2026/27 ASSESSMENT ROLL
Parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as shown on the Placer County Assessor's map for the year in which this Report is prepared.
A listing of parcels to be assessed within this District, along with the proposed assessment amounts, shall be submitted to the City Clerk, under separate cover, and by reference is made part of this Report.
Non-assessable lots or parcels may include areas of public streets and other roadways (typically not assigned an APN by the County); dedicated public easements, open space areas and rights-of-ways including public greenbelts and parkways; utility rights-of-ways; common areas; landlocked parcels, small parcels vacated by the County, bifurcated lots, and any other property that cannot be developed, excepting common area parcels. These types of parcels are considered to receive little or no benefit from the improvements and are therefore exempted from assessment.
At the conclusion of the public hearing for the District and the proposed assessments, approval of the Report (as submitted or as modified) confirms the method of apportionment and the assessment rate to be levied against each eligible parcel and thereby constitutes the approved levy and collection of assessments for FY 2026/27. The listing of parcels and the amount of assessment to be levied shall be submitted to the County Auditor/Controller and included on the FY 2026/27 property tax roll for each parcel.
If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the Current Fiscal Year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel numbers will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel or parcels shall be based on the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this Report. Therefore, if a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate rather than a proportionate share of the original assessment.
ASSESSOR
PARCEL NUMBER
LAND
USE CHARGE MAXIMUM ASMT
FRONT
FOOTAGE ACRES SF UNITS LEGAL DESCRIPTION
011-143-008-000 MFR $688.56 $688.57 140.0 0.4821 0.0 LOTS 1 2 3 BLK 5 MCRAE ADDN 011-145-008-000 MFR 669.22 669.23 120.0 0.4810 0.0 PARCEL 1 MAIN STREET PLAZA APTS OF PARCEL MAP 36-5 011-146-008-000 SFR 238.40 238.41 0.0 0.0000 1.0 FR LOTS 8 9 BLK 2 MCRAE ADDN 011-146-011-000 COM 925.96 925.97 50.0 0.1600 0.0 LOT 12 BLK 2 MCRAE ADDN 011-146-012-000 COM 925.96 925.97 50.0 0.1600 0.0 L 13 BLK 2 MCRAE ADDN 011-146-013-000 COM 925.96 925.97 50.0 0.1600 0.0 LOT 14 BLK 2 MCRAE ADDN 011-146-016-000 SFR 238.40 238.41 0.0 0.0000 1.0 FR LOTS 8 9 BLK 2 MCRAE ADDN 011-146-017-000 SFR 238.40 238.41 0.0 0.0000 1.0 POR LOTS 8 & 9 BLK 2 MCRAE ADDN MOR A-38 011-146-024-000 COM 1,266.76 1,266.77 100.31 0.1943 0.0 L 10 & P L 11 BLK 2 MCRAE ADD 011-146-025-000 COM 748.80 748.81 39.64 0.1300 0.0 POR L 11 BLK 2 MCRAE ADDITION 011-146-026-000 MFR 696.78 696.79 150.0 0.4814 0.0 PARCEL 2 MAIN STREET PLAZA APTS OF PARCEL MAP 36-5 011-147-002-000 COM 1,358.40 1,358.42 80.0 0.2296 0.0 FR LOTS 9 10 BLK 1 MCRAE ADDN 011-147-006-000 COM 1,303.76 1,303.76 50.0 0.2410 0.0 FR LOT 7 BLK 1 MCRAE ADDN 011-147-007-000 COM 1,875.88 1,875.89 75.0 0.3444 0.0 LOTS 5 6 BLK 1 MCRAE ADDN 011-147-008-000 COM 786.00 786.02 40.0 0.1377 0.0 LOT 4 BLK 1 MCRAE ADDN 011-147-009-000 COM 2,060.44 2,060.45 110.0 0.3570 0.0 LOTS 2 3 FR 1 BLK 1 MCRAE ADDN 011-147-010-000 COM 963.60 963.61 0.0 0.2066 0.0 LOT IN RSVL 011-147-011-000 COM 589.62 589.63 30.0 0.1033 0.0 FR LOT 1 BLK 1 MCRAE ADDN 011-147-016-000 SFR 238.40 238.41 0.0 0.0000 1.0 LOT 1 THE BELVEDERE GG-69 011-147-017-000 SFR 238.40 238.41 0.0 0.0000 1.0 LOT 2 THE BELVEDERE GG-69 011-147-018-000 SFR 238.40 238.41 0.0 0.0000 1.0 LOT 3 THE BELVEDERE GG-69 011-147-019-000 SFR 238.40 238.41 0.0 0.0000 1.0 LOT 4 THE BELVEDERE GG-69 011-147-020-000 SFR 238.40 238.41 0.0 0.0000 1.0 LOT 5 THE BELVEDERE GG-69 011-147-021-000 SFR 238.40 238.41 0.0 0.0000 1.0 LOT 6 THE BELVEDERE GG-69 011-147-022-000 SFR 238.40 238.41 0.0 0.0000 1.0 LOT 7 THE BELVEDERE GG-69 011-147-023-000 SFR 238.40 238.41 0.0 0.0000 1.0 LOT 8 THE BELVEDERE GG-69 011-147-024-000 SFR 238.40 238.41 0.0 0.0000 1.0 LOT 9 THE BELVEDERE GG-69 011-147-025-000 SFR 238.40 238.41 0.0 0.0000 1.0 LOT 10 THE BELVEDERE GG-69 011-147-026-000 SFR 238.40 238.41 0.0 0.0000 1.0 LOT 11 THE BELVEDERE GG-69 011-147-027-000 SFR 238.40 238.41 0.0 0.0000 1.0 LOT 12 THE BELVEDERE GG-69 011-147-028-000 SFR 238.40 238.41 0.0 0.0000 1.0 LOT 13 THE BELVEDERE GG-69 011-147-029-000 SFR 238.40 238.41 0.0 0.0000 1.0 LOT 14 THE BELVEDERE GG-69 011-147-030-000 SFR 238.40 238.41 0.0 0.0000 1.0 LOT 15 THE BELVEDERE GG-69 011-147-031-000 SFR 238.40 238.41 0.0 0.0000 1.0 LOT 16 THE BELVEDERE GG-69 011-147-032-000 SFR 238.40 238.41 0.0 0.0000 1.0 LOT 17 THE BELVEDERE GG-69 011-147-033-000 SFR 238.40 238.41 0.0 0.0000 1.0 LOT 18 THE BELVEDERE GG-69 011-147-034-000 Exempt 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0000 0.0 LOT A THE BELVEDERE GG-69 012-121-001-000 COM 2,101.16 2,101.17 160.0 0.3272 0.0 FR LOTS 11 14 15 16 BLK 38 R 012-121-002-000 COM 1,236.84 1,236.85 140.0 0.1573 0.0 FR L 12 13 BLK 38 RSVL 012-121-003-000 COM 4,984.96 4,984.97 201.0 0.9139 0.0 LOTS BLK 38 RSVL City of Roseville
Historic District Landscape and Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2026/27 Preliminary Assessment Roll
Willdan Financial Services Page 1 of 2
ASSESSOR
PARCEL NUMBER
LAND
USE CHARGE MAXIMUM ASMT
FRONT
FOOTAGE ACRES SF UNITS LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Roseville
Historic District Landscape and Lighting District
Fiscal Year 2026/27 Preliminary Assessment Roll
012-121-007-000 COM 662.46 662.47 81.15 0.0795 0.0 LOT 8 BLK 38 RSVLE 012-121-009-000 COM 550.96 550.97 50.0 0.0796 0.0 POR L 7 BLOCK 38 ROSEVILLE 012-121-011-000 EXE 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0000 0.0 L 1 113 MAIN ST O-70 012-121-012-000 COM 189.52 189.53 26.0 0.0206 0.0 UNIT 1 113 MAIN STREET CONDO 012-121-013-000 COM 150.42 150.43 22.0 0.0153 0.0 UNIT 2 113 MAIN STREET CONDO 012-121-014-000 COM 139.22 139.24 22.0 0.0129 0.0 UNIT 3 113 MAIN STREET CONDO 012-122-001-000 COM 3,351.12 3,351.13 150.0 0.6029 0.0 L 12 THRU 16 RSVLLE 012-122-003-000 COM 2,717.02 2,717.04 208.59 0.4218 0.0 L 5 BLK 21 ROSEVILLE 012-200-004-000 COM 360.48 360.48 31.0 0.0534 0.0 LOT 7 BANK CORNER ADDN 012-200-005-000 COM 360.48 360.48 31.0 0.0534 0.0 LOT 6 BANK CORNER ADDN 012-200-006-000 COM 360.48 360.48 31.0 0.0534 0.0 OWL CLUB FRNSHNGS/FXTRS LOT 5 BANK CORNER ADDN 012-200-007-000 COM 430.62 430.64 16.0 0.0800 0.0 POR BANK CORNER SUBD 012-200-008-000 COM 514.84 514.84 55.0 0.0680 0.0 L 3 4 BANK CORNER ADDN 012-200-009-000 COM 470.68 470.70 47.0 0.0647 0.0 LOTS 1 2 BANK CORNER ADDN 012-200-010-000 COM 1,053.82 1,053.82 53.0 0.1851 0.0 FR LOTS 9 10 11 12 BLK 22 RSVL 012-200-011-000 COM 1,430.20 1,430.21 107.5 0.2238 0.0 LOT 8 FR 7 BLK 22 RSVLE 012-200-012-000 COM 1,081.06 1,081.07 55.0 0.1894 0.0 FR LOTS 6 7 BLK 22 RSVLE 012-200-013-000 COM 786.00 786.02 40.0 0.1377 0.0 FR LOTS 5 6 BLK 22 RSVLE 012-200-026-000 COM 107.74 107.74 0.0 0.0231 0.0 FR L 12 BLK 22 RSVLE 012-200-027-000 COM 433.24 433.24 31.0 0.0690 0.0 FR L 12 BLK 22 L 8 BANK C 012-200-030-000 COM 427.36 427.37 50.0 0.0531 0.0 POR LOT 13 BLK 22 ROSEVILLE 012-200-032-000 MFR 1,464.00 1,464.02 281.68 1.0374 0.0 1.32 AC PAR 1 PM 36-66 Summary Fields Value
ACTIVE PARCELS 62
LEVIED PARCELS 60
CHARGE $46,156.78
MAXIMUM ASMT $46,157.32
FRONT FEET 2,974.87
ACRES 8.7909
SF UNITS 21
Willdan Financial Services Page 2 of 2
1 RESOLUTION NO 26-125
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE,
CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF
ASSESSMENTS FOR THE INFILL AREA LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026/2027, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF PART 2 OF DIVISION 15 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE The City Council of the City of Roseville, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the City Council has, by previous resolutions, formed the Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District and annexed territory therein (hereafter referred to as the “District”) and annexed territory therein pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, beginning with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the “Act”), which provides for the levy and collection of assessments by the County of Placer for the City of Roseville to pay for the maintenance and services relating to landscaping, all appurtenant facilities and operations related thereto; and WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services (hereafter “Engineer”) for the purpose of assisting with the establishment of the assessments, the annexation of territory, and the preparation and filing of an Engineer’s Annual Levy Report (hereafter referred to as the “Engineer’s Report”) with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act, and the California Constitution, Articles XIIIC and XIIID;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY
THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE INFILL AREA LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1 Engineer’s Report: The City Council hereby orders the Engineer to prepare and file with the City Clerk the Engineer’s Report concerning the levy of assessments for the District in accordance with Chapter 3, Section 22622 of the Act.
Section 2 Proposed improvements and any substantial changes in existing improvements: The District improvements include: maintenance and operation of and the furnishing of services, materials and/or improvements for the landscape and lighting areas adjacent to property within the Pheasant Run, Cirby Oaks II and Reuter Ranch subdivisions, and other public improvements within the street right-of-way areas and all appurtenant facilities related thereto as further described in the Engineer’s Report. The Engineer’s Report also describes all new improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements.
2 RESOLUTION NO. 26-125
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS ___________ day of ___________, 2026. ____________________________________,
Mayor
City of Roseville
____________________________________,
City Clerk
City of Roseville
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF PLACER) ss.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE)
I, _______________________________, City Clerk of the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. ___________ was adopted by the City Council of said City of Roseville at a regular meeting of said council held on the __________ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
____________________________________,
City Clerk
City of Roseville
1 RESOLUTION NO.26-126
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE,
CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS
FOR THE INFILL AREA LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FISCAL YEAR 2026/2027
The City Council of the City of Roseville, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the City Council has, by previous resolutions, formed the Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District (hereafter referred to as the “District”), and initiated proceedings for Fiscal Year 2026/2027, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, beginning with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the “Act”), which provides for the levy and collection of assessments by the County of Placer for the City of Roseville to pay for the maintenance, operation and servicing of all improvements and facilities related thereto; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services for the purpose of assisting with the Annual Levy of the District and the preparation and filing of a report (hereinafter referred to as the “Engineer’s Report”) with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY
THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE INFILL AREA LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3, SECTION 22624 OF THE ACT, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1 Intention: The City Council hereby declares that it is its intention to seek the Annual Levy of the District pursuant to the Act, over and including the land within the District boundary, and to levy and collect assessments on all such land to pay for the annual costs of the improvements.
Section 2 Proposed improvements and any substantial changes in existing improvements: The District improvements include: maintenance and operation of and the furnishing of services, materials or improvements for the landscape and lighting areas, including turf, ground cover, shrubs and trees, irrigation systems, drainage systems, and other public improvements within the street right-of-way areas and all appurtenant facilities related thereto as further described in the Engineer’s Report. The Engineer’s Report also describes all new improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements.
2 Section 3 Boundaries and Designation: The boundaries of the District as previously defined in the formation documents of the original District and any annexations thereto. The District includes the parcels within the areas known as the Pheasant Run, Cirby Oaks II and Reuter Ranch subdivisions. The District is known and designated as:
“Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District”
Section 4 Proposed Assessment Amounts: The proposed assessments are outlined in the Engineer’s Report. District Assessments are calculated in accordance with the method of apportionment established for the District and do not exceed the assessment rates.
Section 5 Public Hearing: The City Council hereby declares its intention to conduct a Public Hearing annually concerning the levy of assessments for the District in accordance with Chapter 3, Section 22626 of the Act.
Section 6 Notice: The City Clerk shall give notice of the time and place of the Public Hearing by causing this resolution to be published once in the local newspaper not less than ten (10) days before the date of the hearing and by posting a copy of this resolution on the official bulletin board customarily used by the City Council for the posting of notices.
Section 7 Time and Place of Public Hearing: Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing on these matters will be held by the City Council on Wednesday, June 3, 2026 at 6:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as feasible in the regular meeting chambers located at 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, California.
3 RESOLUTION NO. 26-126
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS ___________ DAY OF ___________, 2026. ____________________________________,
Mayor
City of Roseville
____________________________________,
City Clerk
City of Roseville
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF PLACER) ss.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE)
I, _______________________________, City Clerk of the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. ___________ was adopted by the City Council of said City of Roseville at a regular meeting of said council held on the __________ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
____________________________________,
City Clerk
City of Roseville
1 RESOLUTION NO. 26-127
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER’S ANNUAL
LEVY REPORT FOR THE INFILL AREA LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FISCAL YEAR 2026/2027
The City Council of the City of Roseville, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the City Council has, by previous Resolutions, ordered the preparation of an Annual Levy Report (hereafter referred to as the “Engineer’s Report”) for the district known and designated as the Infill Area Landscaping and Lighting District (hereafter referred to as the “District”), pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, beginning with Section 22500 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”); and WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services (hereinafter “Engineer”), for the purpose of assisting with the establishment of the assessments and the preparation and filing of an Engineer’s Report with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act and the requirements of the California Constitution, Articles XIIIC and XIIID; and WHEREAS, there has now been presented to this City Council the Engineer’s Report as required by Chapter 1, Article 4, Section 22566 of said Act; and WHEREAS, this City Council has carefully examined and reviewed the Engineer’s Report as presented, and is preliminarily satisfied with the District and with each of the budget items and documents set forth therein, and further finds that the assessments, on a preliminary basis, have been spread in accordance with the benefits received from the improvements, operation, maintenance, and services to be performed within each Zone, as set forth in said Engineer’s Report; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY THE
CITY COUNCIL FOR THE INFILL AREA LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1 That the above recitals are all true and correct.
2 Section 2 That the Engineer’s Report, as presented, consists of the following:
a. A Description of Improvements
b. The Annual Budget (Costs and Expenses of Maintenance, Services, Operations and District Administration)
c. The Assessment Roll containing the Fiscal Year 2026/2027 Levy for each Assessor Parcel within the District
Section 3 The Engineer’s Report is hereby approved on a preliminary basis and ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open to public inspection.
Section 4 That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, and the minutes of this meeting shall reflect the presentation of the Engineer’s Report.
3 RESOLUTION NO. 26-127
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS ___________ day of ___________, 2026. ____________________________________,
Mayor
City of Roseville
____________________________________,
City Clerk
City of Roseville
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF PLACER) ss.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE)
I, _______________________________, City Clerk of the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. ___________ was adopted by the City Council of said City of Roseville at a regular meeting of said council held on the __________ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
____________________________________,
City Clerk
City of Roseville
27368 Via Industria
Suite 200
Temecula, CA 92590
T 951.587.3500 | 800.755.6864
F 951.587.3510
www.willdan.com
City of Roseville
Infill Area
Landscaping and Lighting District
FY 2026/27 ENGINEER’S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT
Intent Meeting: May 6, 2026
Public Hearing: June 3, 2026
ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
Establishment of Annual Rates and Charges for the:
Infill Area
Landscaping and Lighting District
City of Roseville
Placer County, State of California
This Report describes the District and any relevant zones therein, including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for Fiscal Year 2026/27 as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention.
Reference is hereby made to the Placer County Assessor’s maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council.
Dated this ______day of ________, 2026.
Willdan Financial Services
Assessment Engineer
On Behalf of the City of Roseville
By: ________________________________
Mickey Ashley
Project Manager
District Administration Services
By: ________________________________
Tyrone Peter
PE # C 81888
DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. OVERVIEW .....................................................................................................1 A. INTRODUCTION......................................................................................1 B. COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT LEGISLATION.....................................2 C. DESCRIPTION OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES.........................................2 D. IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED BY THE 1972 ACT .............................3 E. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND BENEFITS..........................4 II. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT...................................................................6 A. GENERAL ................................................................................................6 B. SPECIAL BENEFIT ANALYSIS................................................................6 C. RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT.........................................8 III. DISTRICT BUDGET........................................................................................9 A. FY 2026/27 BUDGET...............................................................................9 B. FY 2026/27 ASSESSMENT RATES ......................................................10 C. FY 2026/27 FUND BALANCE INFORMATION ......................................10 D. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS.....................................................10 E. REHABILITATION RESERVE – CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN .......16 APPENDIX A – DISTRICT BOUNDARY MAPS......................................................15 APPENDIX B — FY 2026/27 ASSESSMENT ROLL...............................................19