Cities Index.
Agenda Packet

Salinas City Council
June 18, 2024

Document
Agenda Packet
Meeting
June 18, 2024
Body
Salinas City Council
Pages
19
Original file
76.1 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on salinas.legistar.com. That file is the official record.

Tuesday, June 18, 2024
4:00 PM
City of Salinas
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas, CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org

SALINAS ROTUNDA
City Council
Mayor Kimbley Craig
Councilmembers:

Carla Viviana González, District 1 - Tony Barrera, District 2 Jesus Valenzuela, District 3 - Orlando Osornio, District 4 Andrew Sandoval, District 5 - Anthony Rocha, District 6 Rene Mendez, City Manager
Christopher A. Callihan, City Attorney
City Clerk’s Office: (831) 758-7381
Meeting Agenda - Final
City Council Meeting Agenda - Final June 18, 2024

ZOOM WEBINAR PARTICIPATION
JOIN THE ZOOM WEBINAR TO PARTICIPATE LIVE AT:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/86127260119
To participate telephonically, call any number below:
+1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose) +1 669 444 9171 US +1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma) +1 346 248 7799 US (Houston) +1 719 359 4580 US +1 253 205 0468 US +1 689 278 1000 US +1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC) +1 305 224 1968 US +1 309 205 3325 US +1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago) +1 360 209 5623 US +1 386 347 5053 US +1 507 473 4847 US +1 564 217 2000 US +1 646 558 8656 US (New York) +1 646 931 3860 US Webinar ID: 861 2726 0119
If prompted to enter a participant ID, press #.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

ROLL CALL

PROCLAMATION
Juneteenth
National Portuguese Month, June 2024
California Rodeo Salinas, July 18 - 21, 2024
National Parks and Recreation Month, July 2024

PUBLIC COMMENT PROCEDURES
If you wish to make a general public comment or comment on a specific agenda item, you are encouraged to attend the City Council meeting in person. Public comment may also be submitted via email at [email protected] and will be entered into the record.

PUBLIC COMMENT TIME RESTRICTIONS
Public comments generally are limited to two minutes per speaker; the Mayor may further limit the time for public comments depending on the agenda schedule.

GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS
Receive public communications on items that are not on the agenda and that are in the City of Salinas’ subject matter jurisdiction. Comments on Consent, Consideration, and Closed session items should be held until the items are reached. The public may request that the legislative body consider adding an item for consideration on a future agenda. The public may comment on scheduled agenda items, including closed session items, as they are considered.

City of Salinas Page 2 Printed on 6/17/2024
City Council Meeting Agenda - Final June 18, 2024

PUBLIC HEARINGS
ID#24-330 Conditional Use Permit 2022-048 (1228 South Main Street); Appeal of CannaCruz, Inc. and referral from the Salinas Planning Commission Recommendation: Consider CannaCruz, Inc.'s appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of Conditional Use Permit 2022-048 and consider CannaCruz, Inc.'s application for a major amendment to Commercial Cannabis Permit 2023-007 to relocate from 1156 Abbott Street to 1228 South Main Street upon appeal of the Selection Committee's denial and upon referral from the Salinas Planning Commission.

ID#24-363 Wastewater Collection Public Hearing
Recommendation: Conduct a public hearing and determine the official number of written protests received on the proposed collection of wastewater collection fees and charges on the property tax roll by Monterey County and, if the number of valid protest votes is below 50% of the number of property owners or customers authorized to vote, approve a Resolution approving the City's 2024-2025 Annual Rate Report for Wastewater Collection and directing collection of the fees and charges detailed in the report on the Monterey County Tax Roll.

CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under Consent Agenda may be enacted by one motion unless a member of the Council or the public requests discussion or a separate vote.

ID#24-364 Minutes
Recommendation: Approve minutes of May 21, 2024, June 4, 2024, and June 11, 2024.

ID#24-361 Financial Claims
Recommendation: Approve financial claims report.

ID#24-155 Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project Phase 1, CIP 9510 Recommendation: Approve a Resolution approving the plans and specifications for the Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project Phase 1, CIP No. 9510; and award contract to Granite Construction Company for the Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project Phase 1, CIP No. 9510 in the amount of $15,637,796.93 (Base Bid minus Items 142, 143, 144 Plus Items 145, 146, 147, 148,149); and approve a transfer of funds in the amount of $5,300,000 to CIP 9510 - Boronda Road Congestion Relief Project.

ID#24-233 AVP Salinas-based Artist Grants Pilot Program Recommendation: Approve a Resolution approving the Alisal Vibrancy Plan Salinas-based Artist Grants Pilot Program ("Program"), and appropriating $150,000 from Capital Improvement Program 9246, EDE Alisal Vibrancy Plan, to fund the Program.

ID#24-282 Landscape Maintenance Districts Agreements for Services City of Salinas Page 3 Printed on 6/17/2024
City Council Meeting Agenda - Final June 18, 2024
Recommendation: Approve a Resolution approving specifications for the Annual Maintenance Districts' Landscape Services for the Harden Ranch, Mira Monte, Airport, and Woodside Maintenance Districts; and awarding contracts for Landscape Maintenance Services for Harden Ranch Maintenance District for an amount not to exceed $210,000 and Mira Monte, Airport, and Woodside Maintenance Districts for an amount not to exceed $207,057; and authorizing the City Manager to enter into agreements for services with Brightview Landscape Services, Inc. for landscape maintenance services.

ID#24-302 Master Services Agreements For On-Call Consultants For Project Management, Environmental Services, Construction Management, And Inspection Services
Recommendation: Approve a Resolution authorizing the establishment of a three-year On-Call List of consultants for project management, environmental services, construction management, and inspection services to include 4Leaf, Inc., CSG Consultants Inc., Rincon Consultants Inc., Epicus Group, Denise Duffy & Associates, Inc., Ausonio, Inc., and Cumming Group; and authorize the City Manager to execute the Master Services Agreement for Professional Services with the seven consultants on for a compensation amount not-to-exceed amount of $300,000.

ID#24-311 Amendment No. 3 to the Master Service Agreement for Professional Services with CSG Consultants, Inc.

Recommendation: Approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 3 to the Master Service Agreement for Professional Services between the City of Salinas and CSG Consultants, Inc. in the amount not to exceed $1,150,696.50 to provide design, inspection, project management, construction management, labor compliance and environmental services for various Capital Improvement Projects (CIPs).

ID#24-312 Direct Purchase of Body Armor for Firefighters Recommendation: Approve a Resolution authorizing the Purchasing Agent to complete the direct purchase of body armor and ballistic helmets from AARDVARK in the amount of $134,627.50, to include a 10% contingency for a total not to exceed amount of $148,090.25.

ID#24-315 R&B Helicopters, Inc. Lease Amendment No. 1 - 240 Mortensen Avenue Recommendation: Approve a Resolution authorizing the Mayor to enter into an Amendment to the Lease Agreement with R & B Helicopters, Inc. to grant an extension through June 30, 2025, with options for additional extensions on a month-to-month basis.

ID#24-321 Purchase of SMART Irrigation Controllers
Recommendation: Approve a Resolution authorizing the Purchasing Agent to complete the purchase of 48 SMART irrigation controllers from Martin's Irrigation Supply, Inc. for the amount of $184,177.98, plus a 10% contingency, for a total amount not to exceed $202,596.

ID#24-335 Closter Park Playground Equipment Purchase
Recommendation: Approve a Resolution authorizing the Purchasing Agent to complete the purchase of playground equipment for Closter Park from Landscape Structures, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $198,594; and approve the reallocation of $1,000,000 in ARPA Park Irrigation Upgrades for Closter Park Improvements.

ID#24-336 Agreement for Services with AMS.NET, Johnson Electronics, and MJ Communications For Security Cameras and Access Controls City of Salinas Page 4 Printed on 6/17/2024
City Council Meeting Agenda - Final June 18, 2024
Recommendation: Approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an Agreement for Services with AMS.NET Inc., Johnson Electronics Inc., and MJ Communications Inc. for the design, build, installation and maintenance of security cameras and access control systems at City owned facilities in a total amount not to exceed $1,000,000.

ID#24-339 Acceptance of the City Hall Emergency Roof Repairs Recommendation: Approve a Resolution accepting the City Hall Emergency Roof Repair Project for maintenance and responsibility.

ID#24-340 Subrecipient Funding Agreements for Homeless Services Projects for FY 24-25
Recommendation: Approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute Subrecipient Agreements for homeless services projects for FY 2024-2025 and authorizing the amendment of Subrecipient Funding Agreement No. 22SESG01 with Central Coast Center for Independent Living.

ID#24-341 Direct Purchase of Vigilant Fixed License Plate Reader (LPR) Camera Systems and Payment of the Annual Subscription Fee
Recommendation: Approve a Resolution authorizing the Purchasing Agent to complete the direct purchase of L5F Fixed License Plate Reader (LPR) camera systems and associated equipment and services from Vigilant Solutions, LLC for a total cost not to exceed $49,812.82; and a Resolution approving the expenditure of $35,559.43 and authorizing the City Manager to execute the associated annual subscription agreement for the period of July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2025, for the annual subscription fee with Vigilant Solutions, LLC.

ID#24-342 Direct Purchase of 12-Passenger Van
Recommendation: Approve a Resolution authorizing the Purchasing Agent to complete the direct purchase of one 2024 Ford Transit 12-Passenger Van for a total cost not to exceed $61,365.70.

ID#24-345 Agreement for Services with Cadence Team, Inc. for Network Infrastructure Maintenance and Support
Recommendation: Approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an Agreement for Services (Agreement) with Cadence Team, Inc. to provide network infrastructure maintenance, and support for a one (1) year term in an amount not to exceed $60,000.

ID#24-350 HVAC Maintenance Service Agreement Amendment No. 2 Recommendation: Approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 2 with Environmental Systems Inc. for HVAC Maintenance Services to modify the compensation terms to increase the annual rate of compensation by Two Hundred Eighty Dollars ($280) for a total not to exceed amount of Seventy Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Dollars ($70,750).

ID#24-355 Purchase of Battery Backup System for Servers Recommendation: Approve a Resolution authorizing the Purchasing Agent to purchase an Uninterruptible Power Supply system from CDW-G LLC., for server equipment in an amount not to exceed $81,000.

ID#24-356 Amendment No. 5 to Agreement for Services with Benitez Security Services, Inc.

City of Salinas Page 5 Printed on 6/17/2024
City Council Meeting Agenda - Final June 18, 2024
Recommendation: Approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 5 to Agreement for Services (No. 22ARPA04) with Benitez Security Services, Inc. to increase the compensation amount for a total amount not to exceed $1,285,237 and to extend the term to October 31, 2024.

ID#24-366 City Observed Holidays and Side-Letter Agreement for Public Safety Units Recommendation: Approve a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to sign side-letter agreements with the Fire Supervisors Association (FSA), Salinas Firefighters Local 1270, and Police Managers Association (PMA) recognizing Cesar Chavez Day and Juneteenth as holidays.

COUNCILMEMBERS’ REPORTS, APPOINTMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Receive communication from Councilmembers on reports, appointments and future agenda items. Councilmember comments are generally limited to three minutes.

ADJOURNMENT
_____________________________
Patricia M. Barajas, City Clerk

AGENDA MATERIAL / ADDENDUM
Any addendums will be posted within 72 hours of regular meetings or 24 hours of special meetings and in accordance with Californian Government Code Section 54954.2 and 54956. City Council agenda reports and other writings distributed to the legislative body may be viewed at the Salinas City Clerk’s Office, 200 Lincoln Avenue, Salinas, and are posted on the City’s website at www.cityofsalinas.org in accordance with California Government Code section 54597.5. The City Council may take action that is different than the proposed action reflected on the agenda.

Disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, may be requested by any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in the meeting. Language interpretation may be requested as soon as possible but by no later than 5 p.m. of the last business day prior to the meeting. Requests should be referred to the City Clerk’s Office At 200 Lincoln Avenue, Salinas, 758-7381, as soon as possible but by no later than 5 p.m. of the last business day prior to the meeting. Hearing impaired or TTY/TDD text telephone users may contact the city by dialing 711 for the California Relay Service (CRS) or by telephoning any other service providers’ CRS telephone number.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
This agenda was posted on June 14, 2024 in the Salinas Rotunda and City's website.

Meetings are streamed live at https://salinas.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx, televised live on Comcast Channel 25 and on http://www.youtube.com/thesalinaschannel at 4:00 p.m. on the date of the regularly scheduled meeting and will be broadcast throughout the day on Friday, Saturday, Monday and Wednesday following the meeting. For the most up-to-date Broadcast Schedule for The Salinas Channel on Comcast 25, please visit or subscribe to our Google Calendar located at http://tinyurl.com/SalinasChannel25. All past City Council meetings may also be viewed on the Salinas Channel on YouTube at http://www.youtube.com/thesalinaschannel.

City of Salinas Page 6 Printed on 6/17/2024
City Council Meeting Agenda - Final June 18, 2024
City of Salinas Page 7 Printed on 6/17/2024
City of Salinas
Legislation Text
200 Lincoln Ave., Salinas,
CA 93901
www.cityofsalinas.org
File #: ID#24-330, Version: 1
Conditional Use Permit 2022-048 (1228 South Main Street); Appeal of CannaCruz, Inc. and referral from the Salinas Planning Commission
Consider CannaCruz, Inc.'s appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of Conditional Use Permit 2022-048 and consider CannaCruz, Inc.'s application for a major amendment to Commercial Cannabis Permit 2023-007 to relocate from 1156 Abbott Street to 1228 South Main Street upon appeal of the Selection Committee's denial and upon referral from the Salinas Planning Commission.

City of Salinas Page 1 of 1 Printed on 6/14/2024
powered by Legistar™
Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: JUNE 18, 2024
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
FROM: LISA BRINTON, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
THROUGH: COURTNEY GROSSMAN, PLANNING MANAGER
BY: THOMAS WILES, SENIOR PLANNER
TITLE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2022-048 (1228 SOUTH MAIN STREET); APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION

DETERMINATION
RECOMMENDED MOTION:

Consider the appeal of the Planning Commission’s denial of CannaCruz Inc.’s application for Conditional Use Permit 2022-048 to:
a) Change the use from Retail to a proposed two-tenant Shopping Center within an existing 20,162 square-foot building located at 1228 South Main Street in the Commercial Retail - South Main Street Focused Growth Overlay District (CR–FG-3) Zoning District; b) Allow for a 41-space (51%) Parking Reduction per Zoning Code Table 37-50.100; c) Except the use from the requirements of Zoning Code Section 37-50.200 to allow for internal waste storage to be located within the existing structure; and d) Allow for Alternative Means of Compliance for landscaping located at 1228 South Main Street in the Commercial Retail – South Main Street Focused Growth Overlay District (CR-FG-3).

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

On August 23, 2022, CannaCruz, Inc. (“CannaCruz”), in an effort to relocate its commercial cannabis business (dispensary with associated delivery and distribution), submitted an application for Conditional Use Permit 2022-048 (CUP 2022-048) to change the use of an existing 20,162 square-foot building located at 1228 South Main Street in the Commercial Retail - South Main Street Focused Growth Overlay District (CR–FG-3) Zoning District from Retail to a proposed two-tenant Shopping Center. The two tenant uses include a 9,413 square-foot retail furniture store in the front portion (Unit “A”) of the building and a 10,749 square-foot cannabis dispensary with accessory delivery and distribution retail use in the rear portion (Unit “B”). CUP 2022-048 includes the allowance of a 41-space (51%) Parking Reduction pursuant to Zoning Code Table 37-

50.100, exception from the requirements of Zoning Code Section 37-50.200 to allow for internal waste storage to be located within the existing structure, and Alternative Means of Compliance for Page | 2
landscaping. On April 3, 2024, the Planning Commission considered and denied CannaCruz’s application for CUP 2022-48. On April 17, 2024, CannaCruz submitted an appeal of the Planning Commission’s determination.

Related to CUP 2022-048 is CannaCruz’s application for a major amendment to its Commercial Cannabis Permit 2023-007 (“CCP 2023-007”) which is also on appeal to the City Council. In order for CannaCruz to relocate from 1156 Abbott Street to 1228 South Main Street, both CUP 2022- 048 and CCP 2023-007 must be approved.

Staff is requesting that the City Council receive the report, consider whether to grant or to deny CannaCruz’s appeal of the Planning Commission’s denial of Conditional Use Permit 2022-048 (related to the establishment of a commercial cannabis use at 1228 South Main Street), make findings in support of its determination, and make findings with respect to compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

BACKGROUND:

CannaCruz is currently operating an existing cannabis dispensary with accessory delivery and distribution at 1156 Abbott Street (CCP 2023-003). CannaCruz has stated they need to relocate due to their lease ending. CannaCruz applied for Conditional Use Permit 2022-048 (CUP 2022- 048) to change the use of 1228 South Main Street from Retail to a proposed two-tenant Shopping Center within an existing 20,162 square-foot building. Proposed uses include a 9,413 square-foot retail furniture store in the front portion (Unit “A”) and a 10,749 square-foot cannabis dispensary with accessory delivery and distribution retail use in the rear portion (Unit “B”). CUP 2022-048 includes a, a 41-space (51%) Parking Reduction per Zoning Code Table 37-50.100 (40 off-street parking spaces), exception from the requirements of Zoning Code Section 37-50.200 to allow for internal waste storage to be located within the existing structure, and Alternative Means of Compliance for landscaping located on a 1.02-acre site at 1228 South Main Street in the Commercial Retail - South Main Street Focused Growth Overlay District (CR–FG-3) Zoning District; and
The property is owned by Samuel & Marguerite Kobrinsky, Trustees. A furniture store previously occupied the building until December 31, 2021. The following provides an overview of the land uses and zoning districts adjacent to the project site:

North: Restaurant and Multi-family Residential / Commercial Retail – South Main Street Focused Growth Overlay District (CR-FG-3)
South: Restaurant and Commercial / Commercial Retail – South Main Street Focused Growth Overlay District (CR-FG-3)
East: Shopping Center / Commercial Retail – South Main Street Focused Growth Overlay District (CR-FG-3)
West: Commercial / Commercial Retail – South Main Street Focused Growth Overlay District (CR-FG-3)
The project was originally scheduled for a Special Planning Commission public hearing on January 10, 2024. However, the hearing was cancelled due to concerns with zoning compliance. On Page | 3
December 29, 2023, the Applicant requested a 90-day time extension pursuant to Government Code Section 65957. Staff met with the Applicant on January 24, 2024, and February 28, 2024, to address outstanding issues. Revised plans were subsequently submitted, and a new hearing was scheduled for Planning Commission consideration on March 20, 2024. However, to ensure the complete processing of CCP 2023-007, the item was continued to the April 3, 2024, Planning Commission meeting.

Analysis:

Note: Analysis of related Commercial Cannabis Permit 2023-007 is contained in a separate City Council Staff Report dated June 18, 2024.

Conditional Use Permit 2022-048
The subject site is designated Retail by the 2002 Salinas General Plan and is located in the CRFG-3 (Commercial Retail – South Main Street Focused Growth Overlay) Zoning District. Per Zoning Code Section 37-30.190, the CR district allows a wide range of commercial retail uses such as retail stores, lodging, commercial recreation, personal services, business services and financial services. Until December 31, 2021, the site was occupied by a furniture store known as Legacy Furniture. The proposed Cannabis Dispensary is considered a retail use. Per Zoning Code Section 37-30.200, Table 37-30.90 and Section 37-40.220, retail uses are typically subject to consideration of an administrative Site Plan Review (SPR) process and would not require a CUP except for a parking reduction that exceeds an administrative level threshold. The request for more than a 30% parking reduction triggers consideration of a CUP by the Planning Commission.

The table below summarizes the square footage of the building by proposed use. (see Exhibits “E” and “L” of CUP 2022-048):

Description (floor plan) Area
(s.f.)
Percent
of Unit
“A”/”B”
Zoning Code
Use Classification
Correlation
Percent
of
Bldg.

Dispensary (Unit “B”)
(lobby, 565 s.f.)
6,543 61% (“B”) Retail 32%
Distribution/Fulfillment
(Unit “B”)
2,718 25% (“B”) Warehouse/Distribution 13%
Employee/Common Area
(Unit “B”)
1,488 14% (“B”) Accessory 8%
Furniture Store (Unit “A”) 9,413 100% (“A”) Retail 47%
Total: 20,162 100%
(both)
n/a 100%
As shown above, 79% (32%+47%=79%) of the floor area of the building would be allocated to retail (dispensary and furniture store) and 21% (13%+8%=21%) for distribution/fulfillment and employee/common area, which conforms with the Retail zoning district requirements.

The project site is located in the South Main Street Focused Growth Overlay District (FG-3). Per Page | 4
Zoning Code Section 37-40.200, the purpose of the Focused Growth Overlay District is the following:
(a) Create healthy neighborhood centers where residents of all economic and cultural backgrounds can live, work, walk, shop, exercise, and spend quality time outdoors; (b) Increase pedestrian activity by creating neighborhood centers that are conveniently accessed by public transit;
(c) Provide a mixture of uses to keep the neighborhoods active at all times of the day, not just morning and evening (as in the case of residential zones) or business hours (for commercial zones);
(d) Reduce vehicle trips and traffic by encouraging a mixture of uses and activities in one location;
(e) Encourage creative architecture and public design that communicate a neighborhood's locale, purpose, priorities, and personality to those who use the space; and (f) Create revitalized neighborhoods through infill development and redevelopment activities.

The proposed project substantially complies with the purposes of the FG-3 District through infill development by revitalizing an existing vacant building providing additional retail opportunities.

Per Zoning Code Section 37-40.250, the Mixed Use Development standards shall apply to all development in the Focused Growth Overlay. The primary entrance for the retail furniture use, Unit “A”, will be from South Main Street which will provide eyes to the street as per Zoning Code Section 37-30.280(f)(1). The South Main Street frontage will provide natural surveillance per Zoning Code Section 37-30.280(d) with the placement of windows, doors, and walkways.

The primary entrance for Unit “B” will be from a side entrance which is relatively close to the driveway entrance from South Main Street. The main entrance to the cannabis dispensary and distribution use, Unit “B”, would provide natural surveillance with the placement of windows, doors, and a walkway facing the north elevation. Ancillary storage for the retail use for Unit “B” would be in the rear of the unit and not located within the public view.

The project includes a six (6) foot tall fence along the west and south property lines and maintenance of an existing fence along the north property line to separate the use from adjacent properties. The project includes changes to the exterior building elevations and retention of the existing freestanding sign.

Landscaping:

The project includes landscaping along the South Main Street frontage and within the parking lot area. Per the project plans, 6,323 square-feet of the project site (14%) and 887 square-feet of the parking area (6%) would be landscaped, which exceeds the minimum Zoning Code requirements of 10% and 5% respectively. The applicant is requesting approval of Alternative Means of Compliance for landscaping pursuant to Zoning Code Section 37-50.690(i), wherein enhanced landscaping would be installed along the South Main Street frontage where visible to the public in lieu of the required property line and parking lot planters pursuant to Zoning Code Section 37- Page | 5

50.690(g)(1)(B) and (g)(4). Alternative Means of Compliance for Landscaping requires enhanced landscaping (trees, shrubs, and groundcover) to be installed along the South Main Street frontage, which will achieve results comparable to those achieved through strict interpretation of the Zoning Code as required per Zoning Code Sections 37-50.690(g)(1)(B) and (g)(4). Landscape and irrigation plans (see Exhibit “M” of CUP 2022-048) are compliant with a condition in CUP 2022- 048 that the proposed walkway from South Main Street to the main entrance of Unit “A” does not exceed four-feet (4’) in width to minimize hardscape along the public frontage.

Recycle/Trash Exception:

The recycling and solid waste facility is proposed to be located in the rear of the building in a secure 283 square-foot area, which requires consideration of an exception. The facility substantially complies with Zoning Code Section 37-30.280(t) because its location will be convenient for commercial users and associated odors and noise will not adversely impact nearby residential and commercial uses. On June 15, 2023, the City’s recycling and solid waste provider Republic Services reviewed the proposed design and stated that it meets their service requirements.

Pursuant to Zoning Code Section 37-50.200(d), the Conditional Use Permit would authorize an exception from the requirements of Zoning Code Section 37-50.200 to allow for internal waste storage to be located within the existing structure per Exhibit “E” of CUP 2022-048 (Proposed Floor Plan). Prior to the issuance of any building permit, proposed occupancy of Unit “A” and/or any additional changes in the use of the shopping center, shall require written confirmation from the City’s solid waste service provider to ensure that the recycling and solid waste provisions of the project will meet the service needs of the service provider.

Off-Street Parking Reduction
The project plans indicate the provision of 40 off-street parking spaces, including two (2) accessible spaces. Per Zoning Code Section 37-50.360, Table 37-50.100, a minimum of 81 offstreet parking spaces are required for the proposed shopping center (20,146/250 = 81). Due to the shortfall of parking, approval of the project requires consideration of a 41-space (51%) Parking Reduction. Planning Commission consideration is required for Parking Reductions exceeding 30%. In order to approve a Parking Reduction any one of the four (4) findings stated in Zoning Code Section 37-50.370(a)(1 – 4) need to be established. (1) Parking and loading requirements for an existing building(s), due to the exceptional shape or size of the site or other unusual site conditions, are burdensome to the point where they prevent a reasonable range of uses similar to other properties in the same zoning district;
(2) The use or activity is participating in a facilities trip reduction plan in accordance with Section 37-50.330: Vehicle trip reduction;
(3) Multiple uses with different peak parking hours are sharing the same parking and loading spaces; or
(4) Survey or other data exists which supports a reduction in parking and loading spaces for Page | 6
uses which, by their nature, are not likely to be converted to another use with greater parking requirements.”
The Applicant is requesting a Parking Reduction per Section 37-50.370(a)(4), which states:
(4) Survey or other data exists which supports a reduction in parking and loading spaces for uses which, by their nature, are not likely to be converted to another use with greater parking requirements.

The Applicant has submitted a traffic demand study entitled “CannaCruz Salinas Parking Demand Study dated February 9, 2024” (attached with the Staff Report and shown as Exhibit “L” of CUP 2022-048), which describes the proposed shopping center as follows:

1. 5,726 square-foot cannabis dispensary;

2. 2,387 square-foot distribution area;

3. 2,660 square-foot employee area; and

4. 9,373 square-foot furniture store.

Per Page 3 of the study, the Applicant states that due to a specific parking rate for cannabis dispensary and furniture store uses in the Zoning Code, that if the specific uses were broken down, then only 39 off-street parking spaces would be required. This is less than the 40 proposed on-site spaces. Page 4 of the study cites parking demand at existing cannabis dispensaries located in Aptos, Moss Landing, Prunedale, and Salinas. On Page 11, using the weighted average peak parking demand rate calculations for the cited dispensaries, the project is estimated to generate a peak parking demand of 37 off-street parking spaces, which is within the proposed 40 spaces. The 16 square-feet difference between the project plans and the Parking Demand Study is for common area such as walkways, which will not have impact on the requirement for off-street parking. The application materials indicate that the project would include 20 employees, with a maximum of 10 on-site employees at one time (see attached “CannaCruz Salinas Parking Demand Study dated February 9, 2024”).

The proposed CUP 2022-048 must be approved in order to allow for a 10,749 square-foot Cannabis Dispensary with accessory Delivery and Distribution in Unit “B” for the related amendment to Commercial Cannabis Permit 2023-003 to be considered. This is because the requested 51% Parking Reduction must be approved.

April 3, 2024, Planning Commission Meeting
On April 3, 2024, the Planning Commission considered CUP 2022-048. On April 3, 2024, the Planning Commission denied CannaCruz’s application for CUP 2022-048. Planning Commissioners expressed concern that the amendment to CCP 2023-007 should be considered concurrently with CUP 2022-048. Planning Commissioners also commented that consideration of amendments to CCP 2023-007 should be deferred to the City Council as a policy consideration.

In a letter dated April 17, 2024, CannaCruz appealed the Planning Commission’s April 3, 2024, decision to deny CannaCruz’s application for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP 2022-048). (A copy of CannaCruz’s April 17, 2024, letter is attached to this report for reference.) The appeal was Page | 7
originally scheduled for City Council consideration on June 11, 2024, in order to meet the sixtyday period required by Salinas Municipal Code section 37-60.1300; however, CannaCruz agreed to continue the appeal before the Salinas City Council to June 18, 2024. (A copy of CannaCruz’s May 21, 2024, email agreeing to continue the appeal to June 18, 2024, is attached to this report for reference.)
Police Department Considerations
The Salinas Police Department issued three memoranda related to CannaCruz’s Amendment Application: February 26, 2024; March 16, 2024; and March 19, 2024. (The Police Department memoranda are attached to this report for reference.)
The March 16, 2024, Memorandum addressed the proposed parking reduction and proposed relocation of CannaCruz to 1228 South Main Street and concluded there are “no issues with the parking reduction or relocation of the dispensary.” The March 16, 2024, Memorandum further concluded that “[a]lthough the subject site is located adjacent to a residential areas, it is the opinion of the Chief of Police that the operation of a Commercial Cannabis business in such location would not tend to cause a public nuisance or a situation which may result in repeated police department response or a negative impact on the adjacent residential units as stipulated by Municipal Code Section 5-07.27(d).” Release of the March 16, 2024, Memorandum was an administrative error:

The Memorandum was not a final draft intended for distribution.

The March 19, 2024, Memorandum replaced the March 16, 2024, Memorandum and addressed the proposed parking reduction and relocation of CannaCruz to 1228 South Main Street location and concluded that there “are no issues with the parking reduction proposed by the Conditional Use Permit or relocation of the dispensary.” (emphasis in original) The March 19, 2024, Memorandum additionally, however, raised concerns with traffic volumes and a nearby intersection and driveway location which has had approximately eighteen traffic collisions, one being fatal. The March 19, 2024, Memorandum also raised concerns with criminal activity at other cannabis dispensaries in Salinas and elsewhere in Monterey County. With respect to the proposed location’s adjacency to a residential use, the March 19. 2924, Memorandum concludes that in “the opinion of the Chief of Police…the operation of the Commercial Cannabis business in such location would tend to cause a public nuisance or a situation which may result in repeated police department response or a negative impact on the adjacent residential units as stipulated by Municipal Code Section 5-07.27(d).” The Police Department has identified issues related with the proposed related CCP 2023-007, which are discussed in the Staff Report for the Major Amendment to the Commercial Cannabis Permit.

Time Consideration:

The project was deemed complete on November 18, 2023. Originally, final action was required by January 17, 2024, pursuant to CEQA Section 15107. As stated above, on December 29, 2023, the Applicant requested a 90-day time extension pursuant to Government Code Section 65957.

Per Government Code Section 65957, the new deadline for action was April 16, 2024. On April 3, 2024, the Salinas Planning Commission denied CUP 2022-048. On April 12, 2024, the Applicant appealed the Planning Commission’s denial of CUP 2022-048 to the Salinas City Page | 8
Council. On May 14, 2024, the Salinas Commercial Cannabis Permit Selection Committee denied CCP 2023-007. On May 16, 2024, the Applicant appealed the Salinas Commercial Cannabis Permit Selection Committee denial of CCP 2023-007 to the Salinas Planning Commission. On May 21, 2024, pursuant to Zoning Code Section 37-60.1300(a), the Applicant requested an extension to the hearing date for the appeal to the City Council to allow for both CUP 2022-048 and CCP 2023-007 to be considered on the same City Council hearing date. On June 5, 2024, the Salinas Planning Commission determined to neither affirm, reverse, or modify the Selection Committee’s determination on CCP 2023-007 and referred the Selection Committee’s determination and appeal thereof to the City Council for consideration.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Depending on the Council’s action with respect to the above appeal the Council will need to either find the project categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In-fill Development Projects), if approved, or statutorily exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15270 (Projects Which are Disapproved), if denied.

If the project is approved, it will need to be determined to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act under Section 15332 (In-fill Development Projects) of the CEQA Guidelines. The project site consists of 1.02-acres and is served by existing utilities and public services. Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality.

If the project is denied, it will need to be determined to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15270 (Projects Which Are Disapproved) of the CEQA Guidelines. This is because as per this Section, CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency rejects or disapproves.

Alternatives Available to the Council:

The City Council is asked to consider CannaCruz’s appeal of the Planning Commission’s denial of CUP 2022-048. In doing so, the City Council should consider the information presented in this report and the information presented during the public hearing on this appeal and should then exercise its discretion and render a decision supported by specifically articulated findings.

The City Council has the following alternatives:

1. Grant CannaCruz’s appeal and approve Conditional Use Permit 2022-048.

2. Deny CannaCruz’s appeal and deny Conditional Use Permit 2022-048.

FINDINGS:

The City Council must establish findings to approve or deny the Conditional Use Permit and Commercial Cannabis Permit applications to change the use from Retail to a proposed two-tenant Page | 9
Shopping Center within an existing 20,162 square-foot building at 1228 South Main Street that includes a 10,749 square-foot Cannabis Dispensary with Accessory Delivery and Distribution retail use in the rear portion of the building, and to amend Commercial Cannabis Permit 2023-003 to relocate an existing Cannabis Dispensary with accessory Delivery and Distribution from 1156 Abbott Street to the subject site.

The City Council must approve the proposed Conditional Use Permit 2022-048 (CUP 2022-048) allowing for a 10,749 square-foot Cannabis Dispensary with accessory Delivery and Distribution in Unit B for the related amendment to Commercial Cannabis Permit 2023-003 (CCP 2023-007) to be considered. Findings for the City Council to consider in making a determination on CUP 2022-048, including a 41-space (51%) Parking Reduction, an exception to allow for internal waste storage to be located within the existing structure, and Alternative Means of Compliance for landscaping, include the following:
a. The proposed location of the use and structure is in accordance with the objectives of the Salinas General Plan, the Zoning Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located;
b. The use and structure will comply with the provisions of the Salinas Zoning Code, including the specific conditions required for the proposed use and structure; and c. The proposed location of the conditional use and the proposed conditions under which it would be operated or maintained are consistent with the Salinas General Plan and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare of persons residing or working in or adjacent to the neighborhood of such use, nor detrimental to properties or improvements in the vicinity or the general welfare of the City of Salinas.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

If approved, this action supports the Council’s Strategic Goals of Economic Development through the retention and addition of retail services and jobs.

DEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

The proposed project has been discussed among the Current Planning and Permit Services Divisions of the Community Development Department, the City Attorney, Police Department, the Public Works Department, and the Fire Department.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

No significant impacts to the City’s General Fund are anticipated with this application.

ATTACHMENTS:

Draft Conditional Use Permit 2022-048 approval document with the following exhibits:

Exhibit "A" Vicinity Map
Page | 10
Exhibit "B" Site Map (Sheet A0.0)
Exhibit "C" Site Plan (Sheet A1.0)
Exhibit "D" Existing Floor Plan (Sheet A2.0)
Exhibit "E" Proposed Floor Plan (Sheet A2.1)
Exhibit “F” Exterior Elevations (Sheet A4.0)
Exhibit “G” Landscape, Fencing, and Bicycle Parking Details (Sheet A9.0) Exhibit “H” Conceptual Landscape Plans (Sheet L1.0)
Exhibit "I" Engineer’s Report dated March 6, 2024
Exhibit "J" Police Department comments dated March 19, 2024 Exhibit “K” Permit Center comments dated February 28, 2024 Exhibit "L" CannaCruz Salinas Parking Demand Study dated February 9, 2024 Exhibit “M” Alternative Means of Compliance for Landscaping Draft Commercial Cannabis Permit 2023-007 approval document CannaCruz Salinas Parking Demand Study from Rick Engineering Company dated February 9, 2024
December 15, 2021, Zoning Information Letter from Adam Garrett to Grant Palmer Commercial Cannabis Permit 2023-003
Ordinance No. 2566 (N.C.S.) and Report to the City Council dated January 26, 2016 Ordinance No. 2597 (N.C.S.) and Report to the City Council dated August 15, 2017 Ordinance No. 2598 (N.C.S.) and Report to the City Council dated September 5, 2017 Ordinance No. 2600 (N.C.S.) and Report to the City Council dated November 7, 2017 June 5, 2024 Planning Commission Staff Report without exhibits June 5, 2024 Planning Commission unofficial minutes
June 4, 2024 Letter from JRG Attorneys at Law appealing Planning Commission denial of CCP 2023-007
June 4, 2024 Letter from Walker+Reed Attorneys at Law opposing CCP 2023-007 May 21, 2024, Email from Trinh Retterer to Christopher Callihan re CCP 2023-007 Amendment Appeal and extending appeal deadline for CUP 2022-048
May 16, 2024, Email (with attached Development Review Application) from Trinh Retterer to City Attorney re CCP 2023-007 Amendment Appeal
May 15, 2024, Letter from City Attorney to Trinh Retterer and Peter D. Brazil re Commercial Cannabis Permit (CCP 2023-007) Major Amendment: Selection Committee Review; Notice of Denial
May 7, 2024, Letter from City Attorney to Trinh Retterer re Commercial Cannabis Permit (CCP 2023-007) Major Amendment
Request for Amendment to Commercial Cannabis Permit (CCP) dated April 29, 2024 (with attachments)
April 17, 2024, Letter from Peter D. Brazil to Lisa Brinton re Conditional Use Permit CUP 2022- 048 Appeal of Planning Commission Decision
April 12, 2024, Letter of Appeal of Planning Commission denial of CUP 2022-048 from JRG Attorneys at Law
April 3, 2024 Planning Commission Staff Report without exhibits April 3, 2024 Planning Commission Official Minutes
Planning Commission Resolution 2024-04
April 3, 2024 CannaCruz CUP 2022-048 Letter to Planning Commission April 2, 2024 Walker+Reed Attorneys at Law Letter opposing CUP 2022-048 and CCP 2023-007 Page | 11
Comments from the Salinas Police Department dated February 26, 2024, March 16, 2024, and March 19, 2024
December 29, 2024 Letter from JRG Attorneys at Law requesting extension to the Permit Streamlining Act for CUP 2022-048
June 9, 2024 Letter of Opposition from Charlie Sammut
Public Correspondence concerning proposed projects dated March 26, 2024 to April 1, 2024 Correspondence from Elli’s Restaurant dated January 12 and 16, 2024 Correspondence from Dr. Ronconi dated December 4, 2023 to January 11, 2024 Sensitive Use for Cannabis Map for 1228 South Main Street CannaCruz Employee Handbook
CannaCruz Operations Manual for Salinas
CannaCruz Salinas Pro Forma
CannaCruz Salinas Security Plan
Cc: CannaCruz, Inc., Applicant
Trinh Retterer and Peter D. Brazil, JRG Attorneys at Law Samuel and Marguerite Kobrinsky, Trustees, Property Owner Other Interested Parties
I:\ComDev\Planning Share Space\Conditional Use Permits\2022 CUP's\CUP 2022-048 - 1228 S Main St\06-18-24 CC Materials\06-18-24 CUP 2022-048 CC Appeal Staff Report.docx

Page 1 of 15 ends

When recorded, return to:

CITY OF SALINAS
Community Development Department
65 West Alisal Street, Salinas, CA 93901
Attn: Thomas Wiles, Senior Planner
SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER’S USE ONLY
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Title of Document
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2022-048
(Related to CCP 2023-007)
City of Salinas
Community Development Department
WHEREAS, on March 20, 2024, the Salinas Planning Commission, at the request of the Applicant, Canna Cruz Inc., held a duly noticed special public hearing to consider Conditional Use Permit 2022-048; request to change the use from Retail to a proposed two-tenant Shopping Center within an existing 20,162 square-foot building; and
WHEREAS, on March 20, 2024, the Salinas Planning Commission continued this item to the April 3, 2024 public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the two shopping center uses include a 9,413 square-foot furniture store retail use in the front portion of the building and a 10,749 square-foot Cannabis Dispensary with accessory Delivery and Distribution retail use in the rear portion; and WHEREAS, the proposed shopping center includes 40 off-street parking spaces, which is below the required 81 off street parking spaces by the Zoning Code, resulting in a request for a 41- space (51%) Parking Reduction per Zoning Code Table 37-50.100; and WHEREAS, CUP 2022-048 includes a requested exception from the requirements of Zoning Code Section 37-50.200 to allow for internal waste storage to be located within the existing structure, and Alternative Means of Compliance for landscaping; and WHEREAS, applicant also requests to amend Commercial Cannabis Permit 2023-003 to allow the relocation of an existing Cannabis Dispensary with accessory Delivery and Distribution from 1156 Abbott Street to the subject site located at 1228 South Main Street within proximity of sensitive use buffers (CCP 2023-007); and
WHEREAS, on April 3, 2024, the Salinas Planning Commission denied CUP 2022-048 pursuant to Planning Commission Resolution 2024-04; and

Page 2 of 15 ends

WHEREAS, on April 12, 2024, the Applicant appealed the Salinas Planning Commission denial of CUP 2022-048 to the Salinas City Council; and WHEREAS, on May 21, 2014, pursuant to Zoning Code Section 37-60.1300(a), the Applicant requested an extension to the hearing date for the appeal to the City Council to allow for both CUP 2022-048 and related CCP 2023-007 to be considered on the same City Council hearing date
WHEREAS, on June 18, 2024, the City Council weighed the evidence presented at said public hearing, including the Staff Report which is on file at the Community Development Department together with the record of environmental review; and made the following findings; a. The proposed location of the use and structure is in accord with the objectives of the Salinas Zoning Code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the site is located; b. The use and structure will comply with use and development standards of the Salinas Zoning Code, including the specific conditions required for the proposed use and structure;
c. The location of the use and structure and the proposed conditions under which it would be operated and maintained will be consistent with the Salinas General Plan and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare of persons residing or working in or adjacent to the neighborhood of such use, nor detrimental to properties or improvements in the vicinity or the general welfare of the City of Salinas; and d. This conditional use has been evaluated in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended; and that the Salinas Planning Commission has reviewed and considered an exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Salinas City Council hereby grants and issues Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-048 pursuant to Article VI, Division 8: Conditional Use Permits, of Chapter 37 of the Salinas City Code and upon the following terms and conditions and not otherwise, to wit:

ISSUED TO: Canna Cruz, Inc.

PROPERTY OWNER: Samuel & Marguerite Kobrinsky, Trustees FOR USE: Change the use from Retail to a proposed two-tenant Shopping Center within an existing 20,162 square-foot
building with a 9,413 square-foot furniture store retail use in the front portion and a 10,749 square-foot Cannabis
Dispensary with accessory Delivery and Distribution retail use in the rear portion under Commercial Cannabis Permit 2023-007 (CCP 2023-007).

ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT: 1228 South Main Street

Page 3 of 15 ends

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 016-161-052-000
ZONING DISTRICT: Commercial Retail - South Main Street Focused Growth Overlay District (CR–FG-3)
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ACTION & DATE: Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) on June 18, 2024.

EXPIRATION DATE: None, once properly established, unless the subject retail use (Cannabis Dispensary with accessory Delivery and Distribution and Furniture Store) ceases operation for a continuous period of six (6) months or more.

RIGHT TO OPERATE/DEVELOP

1. The Permittee shall have the right to change the use from Retail to a proposed twotenant Shopping Center within an existing 20,162 square-foot building with a 9,413 square-foot furniture store retail use in the front portion and a 10,749 square-foot Cannabis Dispensary with accessory Delivery and Distribution retail use under CCP 2023-007 in the rear portion. This CUP includes a 41-space (51%) Parking Reduction per Zoning Code Table 37-50.100, exception from the requirements of Zoning Code Section 37-50.200 to allow for internal waste storage to be located within the existing structure, and Alternative Means of Compliance for landscaping, on the above-described property in accordance with the following exhibits incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this Permit:

Exhibit "A" Vicinity Map
Exhibit "B" Site Map (Sheet A0.0)
Exhibit "C" Site Plan (Sheet A1.0)
Exhibit "D" Existing Floor Plan (Sheet A2.0)
Exhibit "E" Proposed Floor Plan (Sheet A2.1)
Exhibit “F” Exterior Elevations (Sheet A4.0)
Exhibit “G” Landscape, Fencing, and Bicycle Parking Details (Sheet A9.0) Exhibit “H” Conceptual Landscape Plans (Sheet L1.0)
Exhibit "I" Engineer’s Report dated March 6, 2024
Exhibit "J" Police Department comments dated March 19, 2024 Exhibit “K” Permit Center comments dated February 28, 2024 Exhibit "L" CannaCruz Salinas Parking Demand Study dated February 9, 2024
Exhibit “M” Alternative Means of Compliance for Landscaping

LIMITATIONS ON USE

2. Hours of operation for the dispensary shall be limited to 8:30 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.

Page 4 of 15 ends

Monday through Sunday. Hours of operation for the office, storage, and packaging areas shall be limited to 9:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m. Monday through Sunday.

3. If the subject shopping center retail use (Cannabis Dispensary with accessory Delivery and Distribution and Furniture Store) ceases operation for a continuous period of six (6) months or more, this Conditional Use Permit shall become null and void.

4. The Cannabis Dispensary with accessory Delivery and Distribution use shall comply with the terms and conditions of related Commercial Cannabis Permit 2023-007.

5. A minimum six (6) foot tall fence shall be constructed along the north, west and south property lines, except for 15-feet from the front yard property line along the South Main Street frontage, where with maximum allowed height shall be three (3) feet.

6. Retail sales floor area shall not comprise less than 51% (5,495 square-feet) of the 10,773 square-foot Cannabis Dispensary with accessory Delivery and Distribution (Unit “B”).

7. To minimize hardscape, the walkway from South Main Street sidewalk into the front entrance of Unit “A” not exceed four-feet (4’) in width.

8. Unit “A” shall not be occupied until a building permit for a Tenant Improvement permit is processed and finaled. This shall be noted on the building permit plans (see Exhibit “K”).

NPDES REQUIREMENTS

9. The development shall conform to all National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and Low Impact Development (LID) requirements and standards in effect and required by the City Engineer when building permits are issued. The project will require a Storm Water Control Plan (SWCP) that identifies Stormwater Development Standards (SWDS) Compliance to be incorporated into the project (see attached Exhibit “I”).

FIRE PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS

10. All applicable requirements of the Salinas Fire Department including those items identified in Titles 19, 24 and 25 of the California Administrative Code must be met and may include, but not be limited to, provisions for fire alarm systems, fire extinguishers, sprinkler systems, emergency vehicle access and installation of fire hydrants.

Page 5 of 15 ends

11. If required, all fire sprinkler apparatus shall be incorporated into the overall site plan and building design. Such apparatus shall be located within building interiors, garages, stairwells, utility areas, trash areas and/or other areas substantially out of the public view. Fire Department connection pipes shall be painted to match the adjacent building.

CRIME PREVENTION REQUIREMENTS

12. Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall consult with the Police Department regarding crime prevention and security. Written confirmation from the Police Department demonstrating compliance with this condition shall be submitted to the Community Development Department prior to issuance of a building permit. Operation of the 10,749 square-foot retail use (Cannabis Dispensary with accessory Delivery and Distribution) shall comply with the attached Police Department comments dated March 19, 2024 (see Exhibit “J”), with all terms and conditions of related CCP 2023-007, and/or any future renewed and/or approved Commercial Cannabis Permit.

PARKING REQUIREMENTS

13. A minimum of 40 on-site parking spaces shall be provided including two (2) onsite parking space designated for people with disabilities in accordance with Article V, Division 2: Parking, Loading, and Outdoor Lighting. Bicycle parking (rack) shall be provided in accordance with Zoning Code Section 37-50.400 and Exhibit “G”. Pursuant to Zoning Code Section 37-50.370(a)(4), this Conditional Use Permit authorizes a 41-space 51-percent parking reduction as identified in Exhibit “L”, because survey or other data exists which supports a reduction in parking and loading spaces for uses which, by their nature, are not likely to be converted to another use with greater parking requirements. Any future uses with a greater offstreet parking demand than analyzed in the parking survey described in Exhibit “L” shall require an Amendment to this Conditional Use Permit.

14. All off-street parking and loading areas shall be graded, paved, drained, landscaped, striped, and maintained in accordance with Article V, Division 2: Parking, Loading, and Outdoor Lighting of the Salinas City Code.

SIGNS

15. A Master Sign Plan and a Sign Permit issued in accordance with Article V, Division 3: Signs of the Salinas City Code, shall be required for all signs. All signs shall be in compliance with the Master Sign Plan.

16. No canvas signs, banners, pennants, flags, streamers, balloons or other temporary or wind signs; no mobile, A-frame, or portable signs; no roof or canopy signs extending above a building roof; no signs that resemble any official marker erected

Page 6 of 15 ends

by the city, state or any governmental agency, or that by reason of position, shape, color or illumination would conflict with the proper functioning of any traffic sign or signal or would be a hazard to vehicular or pedestrian traffic; no signs which produce odor, sound, smoke, fire or other such emissions; and no animated, flashing, moving or rotating signs shall be permitted unless permitted in accordance with Article 5, Division 3: Signs of the Salinas Zoning Code, as may be amended from time to time.

OUTDOOR LIGHTING

17. Any new exterior lighting may be installed in accordance with Zoning Code Section 37-50.480 under the following limitations:
a. No floodlighting will be allowed on any structure.
b. Parking lot lighting shall be shielded to confine light spread to within the site boundaries and shall not exceed 25 feet in height. c. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the applicant shall submit a detailed lighting plan for review and approval by the Community Development Department.

BUILDING MATERIALS AND COLORS

18. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the materials and colors per zoning code requirements shall be identified on the building permit plans including a separate colors and materials page.

LANDSCAPING

19. Landscaping shall comply with the requirements of the State of California “Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance” (AB 1881) and Article V, Division 4 of the Salinas Zoning Code. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the applicant shall submit detailed final landscape and irrigation plans for review and approval by the Community Development Department. The landscape and irrigation plans shall include the following:
a. Per Zoning Code Section 37-20(b)(4), landscape areas shall incorporate plantings using a three-tier system: 1) grasses and groundcovers, 2) shrubs, and 3) trees.
b. Landscape plans shall show the location, type, size, and names of all plantings: ground covers (1-gallon minimum), shrubs (5-gallon minimum), and trees (15-gallon minimum).
c. Irrigation plans shall show size and location of irrigation pipe, heads, bibs, and backflow devices.

Page 7 of 15 ends

d. Plants shall be maintained and trimmed to three feet in height within the Areas of Unrestricted Visibility triangles at the driveways (15 feet) and street corners (25 feet).
e. All landscape islands within the parking area shall include a minimum of one 15-gallon tree.
f. Planters adjacent to the buildings shall be landscaped with shrubs of a minimum of 5-gallon size, 1-gallon containers for mass planting, and groundcover.
g. Exposed soil shall be landscaped with drought resistant groundcover that will propagate and take root quickly. A minimum two-inch layer of mulch shall be applied except in turf areas, creeping or rooting groundcovers, or direct seeding applications where mulch is contraindicated.
h. Turf shall be limited to 25% of the total landscaping area. No turf shall be permitted in areas with a dimension of less than eight (8) feet, or on slopes exceeding ten-percent.
i. Alternative Means of Compliance for Landscaping shall be approved per Zoning Code Section 37-50.690(i) as shown on Exhibit “M” because enhanced landscaping including, but not limited to trees, shrubs, mounding, decorative boulders, and groundcover) shall be installed along the South Main Street frontage shall achieve results comparable to those achieved through strict interpretation the Zoning Code as required per Zoning Code Sections 37-50.690(C)(3) and (4). j. To minimize hardscape, the landscape and irrigation plans shall show that the walkway from South Main Street sidewalk into the main entrance of Unit “A” not to exceed four-feet (4’) in width. k. Plant material shall conform to the following spacing standards:
i. A minimum of thirty feet from the property corner at a street intersection to the center of the first tree or large shrub; ii. A minimum of fifteen feet between center of trees and ten feet between large shrubs to light standards;
iii. A minimum of ten feet between center of trees or large shrubs and fire hydrants;
iv. A minimum of fifteen feet from the intersection of a driveway (for commercial, mixed use, or public/semipublic and industrial uses) with a street right-of-way to the center of any tree having a diameter larger than eighteen inches at maturity or large shrub

Page 8 of 15 ends

and a minimum of ten feet for residential uses.

RECYCLING AND SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL AREA

20. Pursuant to Zoning Code Section 37-50.200(d), this Permit authorizes an exception from the requirements of Zoning Code Section 37-50.200 to allow for internal waste storage to be located within the existing structure as per Exhibit “E” (Proposed Floor Plan). On June 15, 2023, the City’s recycling and solid waste provider Republic Services reviewed the proposed facility and stated that it meets their service requirements. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, future occupancy of Unit “A” and/or any additional changes in the use of the shopping center, shall require written confirmation from the City’s solid waste service provider to ensure that the recycling and solid waste provisions of the project will meet the service needs of the service provider.

MAINTENANCE

21. All parking areas, driveways, other paved surfaces, accessways and grounds shall be regularly maintained and kept free of weeds, litter, and debris. All traffic signs and pavement markings shall be clear and legible at all times. All landscaped areas shall be maintained free of weeds, trash, and debris, and all plant material shall be continuously maintained in a healthy, growing condition. All exterior building and wall surfaces shall be regularly maintained, and any damage caused by weathering, vandalism, or other factors shall be repaired in conformance with the terms and conditions of this Permit.

22. The Applicant, or successor-in-interest shall eradicate graffiti painted or marked on the facility within seventy-two (72) hours of occurrence pursuant to Municipal Code Section 5-03.19(a)(4).

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS

23. All existing damaged and hazardous sidewalks, and unused driveways shall be reconstructed to City standards prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.

24. Public improvements to serve the development shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and shall be installed in accordance with City standards. All utilities shall be installed underground with details to be included on the final improvement plans.

UTILITIES/EQUIPMENT SCREENING

25. All new utility lines shall be placed underground and all new power transformers shall be placed underground where permitted by the utility company. Where transformers must be pad-mounted above ground, they shall be located away from

Page 9 of 15 ends

the general public view or shall be effectively concealed by landscaping or a screen fence of a design approved by the utility company and the City Planner.

26. All new mechanical equipment and appurtenances (i.e. gas, water meters, electrical boxes, HVAC systems, refrigeration equipment, etc.), building or ground mounted, shall be screened from public view and adjacent properties. Roof vents shall be painted to blend with roof materials. Details shall be shown on the final construction and/or land plans and are subject to the approval of the City Planner.

PERMIT NOT TO SUPERSEDE OTHER REQUIRED LICENSING OR PERMITS

27. The issuance of this Permit shall not relieve the Permittee of any requirement to obtain permits or licensing from any county, regional, state or federal agencies. If applicable, a City Business License shall be obtained prior to commencement of use.

28. This Permit may be subject to water and sanitary sewer allocations. The Permittee will proceed at their own risk as water and sanitary sewer allocation may not be available at the time requested.

MODIFICATION OF APPROVED USE AND PLANS

29. Any modification to the terms and conditions of this Permit are subject to the issuance of a new Permit. The City Planner may approve minor modifications to this Permit if the City Planner finds the modification to be in substantial compliance with the original approval.

VIOLATION; REVOCATION

30. Use of the property shall be conducted in such a way that it does not constitute a nuisance to the use and enjoyment of surrounding properties or the City. Any permittee, person, firm, corporation, whether as principal, agent, employee or otherwise, violating, causing or maintaining the violation of any of the provision of this Permit shall be guilty of a misdemeanor or an infraction, as charged.

Alternatively, any violation of this Permit may be prosecuted administratively pursuant to the City’s Administrative Remedies Ordinance and/or other applicable laws, regulations or codes. Upon determination by the City Planner that there are reasonable grounds for revocation of this Permit, a revocation hearing shall be set to be heard before the Salinas Planning Commission in accordance with Article VI, Division 18: Enforcement and Penalties of the Salinas Zoning Code or such codes as may be subsequently adopted.

SUBSTANTIAL ACTION TIME LIMIT

31. This Permit shall expire one year after its effective date unless:

Page 10 of 15 ends

a. A building permit has been issued and construction diligently pursued; b. A certificate of occupancy has been issued;
c. The use is established in conformance with the provisions of the Zoning Code; or
d. The City Planner determines that substantial action has commenced to carry out the terms and intent of the Conditional Use Permit.

PERMIT VALIDATION

32. Pursuant to Zoning Code Section 37-60.530, this Permit shall be null and void and all terms and conditions shall have no force or effect unless this Permit is signed by the Permittee(s) and returned to City of Salinas Community Development Department within 90 days of approval. It is the applicant's responsibility to track the 90-day expiration date. No notice will be sent.

STANDARD CONDITIONS

33. Pursuant to Salinas City Code Section 1-8.1: Civil action enforcement, and Section 1-8.2: Liability for costs, permittee shall reimburse the City of Salinas for all costs and expenses (including but not limited to fees and charges of architects, engineers, attorneys, and other professionals, and court costs) incurred by the City in enforcing the provisions of this Permit.

34. The applicant(s) shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Salinas or any of its boards, commissions, agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City, its boards, commissions, agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul, the approval of this project/use. For Tentative Maps, this shall also apply when such claim or action is brought within the time period provided for in applicable state and/or local statutes. The City shall promptly notify the applicant(s) of any such claim, action, or proceeding. The City shall cooperate in the defense. Nothing contained in this condition shall prohibit the City from participation in a defense of any claim, action, or proceeding if the City bears its own attorney's fees and costs, and the City defends the action in good faith.

35. Notwithstanding any of the provisions in this permit, all improvements and uses shall comply with all other ordinances and regulations of the City of Salinas and all local, state and federal laws and regulations.

36. No further development other than that shown on this permit or attached exhibits shall be allowed unless or until an amendment to this permit has been approved.

Requests for a minor modification of an approved permit may be granted by the City Planner provided the modification is substantially in compliance with the original approval and conditions.

Page 11 of 15 ends

NOTICE OF CHALLENGE LIMITATIONS

37. Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 requires all Court challenges to the decision to grant this Permit be initiated within 90 days of the final decision of the City in this matter.

EXECUTIONS
THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT was approved by action of the Salinas City Council on June 18, 2024, and shall become effective immediately:

Effective Date:_ June 18, 2024 ____________________________________ Courtney Grossman
Planning Manager, City of Salinas
(Signatures Listed Below on Pages 10 through 14 Must Be Notarized)

Page 12 of 15 ends

THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT is hereby accepted upon the express terms and conditions hereof, and the undersigned Permittee agrees to strictly conform to and comply with each and all of this Permit's terms and conditions.

Dated:_______________ ___________________________
Bradford Palmer
Permittee
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF MONTEREY
On __________________ 202__, before me, _______________________, Notary Public, personally appeared _______________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature _________________________________

Page 13 of 15 ends

Dated:_______________ ___________________________
Grant Palmer
Permittee
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF MONTEREY
On __________________ 202__, before me, _______________________, Notary Public, personally appeared _______________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature _________________________________

Page 14 of 15 ends

CONSENT is hereby granted to the Permittee to carry out the terms and conditions of this Conditional Use Permit.

Dated:_______________ ___________________________
Samuel Kobrinsky, Trustee
Property Owner
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF MONTEREY
On __________________ 202__, before me, _______________________, Notary Public, personally appeared _______________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature _________________________________

Page 15 of 15 ends

Dated:_______________ ___________________________
Marguerite Kobrinsky, Trustee
Property Owner
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF MONTEREY
On __________________ 202__, before me, _______________________, Notary Public, personally appeared _______________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature _________________________________
I:\ComDev\Planning Share Space\Conditional Use Permits\2022 CUP's\CUP 2022-048 - 1228 S Main St\06-18-24 CC Materials\CUP 2022-048 - 06-18-24 Draft CC version.docx

Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: JUNE 18, 2024
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
FROM: LISA BRINTON, DIRECTOR
THROUGH: COURTNEY GROSSMAN, PLANNING MANAGER
BY: THOMAS WILES, SENIOR PLANNER
TITLE: MAJOR AMENDMENT TO COMMERCIAL CANNABIS PERMIT
2023-007; APPEAL ON REFERRAL FROM PLANNING

COMMISSION
RECOMMENDED MOTION:

Consider CannaCruz, Inc.’s appeal of the Selection Committee’s denial on referral from the Planning Commission for a major amendment to Commercial Cannabis Permit 2023-007 to relocate an existing Cannabis Dispensary with accessory Delivery and Distribution from 1156 Abbott Street to the subject site located at 1228 South Main Street within proximity of sensitive use buffers.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

On April 29, 2024, CannaCruz, Inc. (“CannaCruz”) submitted an application for a major amendment (“Amendment Application”) to Commercial Cannabis Permit 2023-007 (“CCP 2023- 007”) to relocate an existing Cannabis Dispensary with accessory Delivery and Distribution from 1156 Abbott Street to 1228 South Main Street. Following the City Attorney’s determination that the Amendment Application contained all the required information, the Amendment Application was forwarded to the Selection Committee appointed by the Interim City Manager for their review in accordance with Article VII of Chapter 5 of the Salinas Municipal Code. On May 14, 2024, the Selection Committee met to consider the Amendment Application and at that meeting denied the Amendment Application. On May 16, 2024, CannaCruz submitted the present appeal of the Selection Committee’s denial of the Amendment Application. The City Council must approve the proposed Conditional Use Permit 2022-048 (CUP 2022-048) allowing for a 10,749 square-foot Cannabis Dispensary with accessory Delivery and Distribution in Unit “B” for the related amendment to Commercial Cannabis Permit 2023-003 (CCP 2023-007) to be considered.

DISCUSSION:

On January 26, 2016, the Salinas City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2566 allowing for the establishment, operation, and regulation of commercial cannabis businesses for the dispensing, Page | 2
distribution, cultivation, and manufacturing of medical marijuana and medical marijuana products. (A copy of the City Council’s January 26, 2016, Report to the City Council and of Ordinance No. 2566 (N.C.S.) are attached to this report for reference. Ordinance No. 2566 repealed a prohibition on the establishment and operation of medical marijuana cultivation facilities and manufacturing facilities, allowed for a limited number of commercial cannabis businesses to open and to operate, provided for a competitive process for the limited number of commercial cannabis permits, and imposed operating restrictions on such businesses in order to protect neighboring properties and businesses from the negative effects of commercial cannabis businesses and in order to protect the health, safety, an welfare of the general public. In adopting the ordinance, the City Council found that reasonable regulations on commercial cannabis businesses were necessary to address the negative impacts and nuisance impacts of such businesses. At the time of the City Council’s adoption of Ordinance No. 2566, one medical marijuana edible manufacturing and wholesale distribution facility had begun operating in the city prior to the City’s having established any land use controls or requirements on the operation of such businesses. Included among the regulations in Ordinance No. 2566 were restrictions on the proximity of commercial cannabis businesses to sensitive uses. The City Council also found that without regulations on the operation of commercial cannabis businesses, there would be an immediate threat to the public health, safety, and welfare from the establishment of commercial cannabis businesses in the City.

The City Council subsequently amended Ordinance No. 2566 (the City’s commercial cannabis business regulations) on three occasions:
a. Ordinance No. 2597 (N.C.S.) adopted on August 15, 2017, increased the maximum number of permits which may be issued in the dispensary, manufacturing, and cultivation categories; provided for an administrative process for cannabis testing facilities; and included administrative revisions to the City’s commercial cannabis regulations to reflect changes in state law and changes in the City’s implementation of the commercial cannabis business regulations. (A copy of Ordinance No. 2597 and the associated Report to the City Council are attached to this report for reference.)
b. Ordinance No. 2598 (N.C.S.) adopted on September 5, 2017, recodified several chapters and articles of the Salinas Municipal Code, including those related to the regulations on commercial cannabis businesses. No changes were made to the content of those provisions outlining the regulations on commercial cannabis businesses. (A copy of Ordinance No. 2598 (N.C.S.) and the associated Report to the City Council are attached to this report for reference.)
c. Ordinance No. 2600 (N.C.S.) adopted on November 29, 2017, updated the regulations on commercial cannabis businesses codified at Article VII of Chapter 5 of the Salinas Municipal Code. Specifically, Ordinance No. 2600 specified that businesses involving adult-use cannabis and cannabis products may operate within the city. Ordinance No. 2600 also clarified the City’s permitting structure for commercial cannabis businesses, clarified the operating requirements of various types of commercial cannabis businesses, established reasonable regulations relating to the growing of cannabis within a private residence for personal use, and included administrative changes to the regulations to reflect changes in state law and in the City’s implementation of the Salinas Municipal Code. (A copy of Page | 3
Ordinance No. 2600 (N.C.S.) and the associated Staff Report to the City Council are attached to this report for reference.)
Commercial Cannabis Permit 2023-007
Note: Analysis of related Conditional Use Permit 2022-048 is stated in a separate City Council Staff Report dated June 18, 2024.

CannaCruz’s Proposed Relocation to 1228 South Main Street In the context of the above-described commercial cannabis regulations, in late 2021, CannaCruz began the process of attempting to relocate from its current location at 1156 Abbott Street to its proposed location at 1228 South Main Street. In response to CannaCruz’s request for zoning information related to the 1228 South Main Street location, in a Zoning Information Letter dated December 15, 2021, the City identified that the proposed location was within 1,000 feet of six sensitive uses identified in the Salinas Municipal Code (section 5-07.27) including four alcoholrelated uses, one smoke shop, and one church. (A copy of the City’s December 15, 2021, letter is attached to this report for reference.) The Zoning Information Letter did not identify the proposed location’s adjacency to a residential use as an issue of concern. The Zoning Information Letter also did not identify approximately nine other alcohol related uses. The following is a list of all of the 15 sensitive uses located within 1,000 feet of the subject property.

1. 72 East San Joaquin Street; religious assembly – Saint Ansgar’s Lutheran Church – 845 feet away;

2. 20 San Miguel Avenue; food and beverage sales with liquor sales – Tokyo Oriental Foods and Gifts – 905 feet away;

3. 1140 South Main Street; food and beverage sales with liquor sales – CVS Pharmacy – 860 feet away;

4. 1150 South Main Street; food and beverage sales with liquor sales – Lucky Supermarket – 640 feet away;

5. 1152 South Main Street; retail sales – smoke and vape shop – Clout Nine Cigar and Vapor – 600 feet away;

6. 1160 South Main Street; restaurant with liquor sales – Round Table Pizza – 490 feet away;

7. 1190 South Main Street; restaurant with liquor sales – Smalley’s Roundup – 350 feet away;

8. 1220 South Main Street; restaurant with liquor sales – Mi Taqueria – 50 feet away;

9. 1237 South Main Street; restaurant with liquor sales – Taqueria Super Pollo – 462 Page | 4
feet away;

10. 1250 South Main Street; restaurant with liquor sales – Elli’s – 20 feet away;

11. 1275 South Main Street; food and beverage sales with liquor sales – Star Market – 438 feet away;

12. 1300 South Main Street; service station with liquor sales – Shell – 456 feet away;

13. 1320 South Main Street; food and beverage sales with liquor sales – Nob Hill Foods – 600 feet away;

14. 1334 South Main Street; restaurant with liquor sales – Guadalajara Grill, LLC – 845 feet away; and

15. 1366 South Main Street; restaurant with liquor sales – Stonies Taphouse & Bistro – 902 feet away
Based on the December 2021 Zoning Information Letter, CannaCruz continued the process of relocating to the proposed location and on August 23, 2022, submitted an application for Conditional Use Permit 2022-048 (CUP 2022-048) to change the use at 1228 South Main Street from Retail to a proposed two-tenant Shopping Center within an existing 20,162 square-foot building. The two tenant uses include a 9,413 square-foot retail furniture store in the front portion (Unit “A”) of the building and a 10,749 square-foot Cannabis Dispensary with accessory Delivery and Distribution retail use in the rear portion (Unit “B”). CUP 2022-048 also includes the allowance of a 41-space (51%) Parking Reduction per Zoning Code Table 37-50.100, exception from the requirements of Zoning Code Section 37-50.200 to allow for internal waste storage to be located within the existing structure, and Alternative Means of Compliance for landscaping Planning Commission consideration is required for Parking Reductions exceeding 30%. On August 24, 2023, an application was submitted for an amendment to their Commercial Cannabis Permit to relocate to the proposed location.

April 3, 2024, Planning Commission Meeting
On April 3, 2024, the Planning Commission considered CUP 2022-048. CCP 2023-007 was also originally scheduled to be considered by the Planning Commission on April 3, 2024, however, due to concerns from the City Attorney and the Community Development Director with the completeness of the application and the process by which the application was reviewed, CCP 2023- 007 was not presented to the Planning Commission for consideration.

On April 3, 2024, the Planning Commission denied CannaCruz’s application for CUP 2022-048.

Planning Commissioners expressed concern that the amendment to CCP 2023-007 should be considered concurrently with CUP 2022-048. Planning Commissioners also commented that consideration of amendments to CCP 2023-007 should be deferred to the City Council as a policy consideration. In a letter dated April 17, 2024, CannaCruz appealed the Planning Commission’s April 3, 2024, decision to deny CannaCruz’s application for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP 2022- Page | 5
048). (A copy of CannaCruz’s April 17, 2024, letter is attached to this report for reference.) The appeal was originally scheduled for City Council consideration on June 11, 2024, in order to meet the sixty-day period required by Salinas Municipal Code section 37-60.1300; however, CannaCruz agreed to continue the appeal before the Salinas City Council to June 18, 2024. (A copy of CannaCruz’s May 21, 2024, email agreeing to continue the appeal to June 18, 2024, is attached to this report for reference.)
June 5, 2024, Planning Commission Meeting
On June 5, 2024, the Planning Commission considered CCP 2023-007. After hearing public testimony from both the Applicant and the public concerning the proposed Commercial Cannabis Permit, the Planning Commission by a unanimous 7-0 vote determined to neither affirm, reverse, or modify the Selection Committee’s determination and refer the Selection Committee’s determination and appeal thereof to the City Council for consideration. (Correspondence submitted to the Planning Commission from JRG Attorneys at Law and Walker+Reed Attorneys at Law dated June 4, 2024, are attached to this Report for reference.) During the public hearing the Planning Commission received public comment both for and against CannaCruz’s proposed relocation. Members of the public expressed concern for the potential negative impacts on the community including the potential for youth exposure to cannabis products, impacts on traffic, and impacts on parking. Planning Commissioners commented positively on the security measures proposed by CannaCruz and CannaCruz’s management of its current commercial cannabis business at 1156 Abbott Street. Planning Commissioners also expressed concern about potential negative impacts which may result from the proposed relocation including traffic impacts and proximity to sensitive uses. Planning Commissioners also expressed concern over the City’s processes including the need for the Municipal Code and cannabis regulations to be updated, the lack of available locations for cannabis businesses to open and operate (because of the restrictions imposed on proximity to sensitive uses). Ultimately, the Planning Commission neither affirmed nor denied CannaCruz’s appeal and instead referred the appeal to the City Council for consideration in part due to the fact that the City Council would also be considering CannaCruz’s appeal of CUP 2022-048 on June 18, 2024. Draft Planning Commission minutes from the June 5, 2024 public hearing have been attached for review.

Commercial Cannabis Permits—Amendment Procedures
The holder of a Commercial Cannabis Permit issued by the City may request amendments to their permits pursuant to the procedures outlined in Salinas Municipal Code section 5-07.09. Pursuant to section 5-07.09, the holder of a Commercial Cannabis Permit may request a change to the business location by submitting all items normally required for a new application, except that information related to the principals or operations that will remain unchanged and are not directly related to the site may be excluded. The application for a change to the business location must submit all items normally required for a new application as outlined on section 5-07.07.

On April 29, 2024, CannaCruz submitted an Amendment Application to relocate its existing Cannabis Dispensary with accessory Delivery and Distribution from 1156 Abbott Street to 1228 South Main Street. (A copy of CannaCruz’s Amendment Application is attached to this report for Page | 6
reference.) On May 7, 2024, the City Attorney determined the Amendment Application to contain all of the required information and forwarded the Amendment Application to the Selection Committee for their review. (A copy of the City Attorney’s May 7, 2024, letter is attached to this report for reference.).

Selection Committee’s Determination and Findings
As outlined in section 5-07.09(a)(2) the Selection Committee is required to review the proposed new location and may approve an amendment to the new location if it can make the following findings:
a. The new site would not be located within the distances specified in section 5-07.27, unless an exception is approved pursuant that section;
b. The relocation to the new site would not create any significant negative impacts greater than those that existed at the original site;
c. The proposed location is located in an appropriate zoning district for the proposed use; and d. Owners of real property located within three hundred feet of the proposed site have been notified and have had an opportunity to provide information to the City regarding the proposed site.

On May 14, 2024, the Selection Committee met to consider the Amendment Application and at that meeting denied the Amendment Application. During that meeting, the Selection Committee conveyed their reasons for the denial and the findings of fact upon which their decision was based to the City Attorney. In a letter to Trinh Retterer and Peter D. Brazil dated May 15, 2024, the City Attorney informed CannaCruz that the Selection Committee had denied CannaCruz’s Amendment Application and also informed CannaCruz of the reasons for the denial. (A copy of the City Attorney’s May 15, 2024, letter is attached to this Report for reference.) As described in the May 15, 2024, letter, the Selection Committee denied CannaCruz’s Amendment Application for the following reasons:
a. The proposed location (1228 South Main Street) is located within 1,000 feet of two sensitive uses listed in section 5-07.27: a smoke-shop (Clout Nine Smoke Shop) located at 1152 South Main Street and a location where alcohol is sold or served for individual consumption on the premises (Ellis’ Restaurant) located at 1250 South Main Street; the proposed location is immediately adjacent to the alcohol related use. The Selection Committee did not find that the intent of Article VII of Chapter 5 of the Salinas Municipal Code, as outlined in section 5-07.01, could otherwise be met. b. The proposed location (1228 South Main Street) is located adjacent to a residential use and, therefore, a determination must be made by either the Police Chief or the Community Development Director as to whether the operation of a commercial cannabis business at this location would tend to cause a public nuisance or a situation which may result in repeated police department response or a negative impact on the adjacent residential uses as required by section 5-07.27(d).
c. Article VII of Chapter 5 of the Salinas Municipal Code reflects the City’s policy and intent that commercial cannabis businesses should not be located in proximity to sensitive uses and reflects the City’s overall master planning perspective that commercial cannabis Page | 7
businesses are best suited for industrial or commercial areas that are not in proximity to sensitive uses, including residential areas.

On May 16, 2024, pursuant to Salinas Municipal Code Section 5-07.10 CannaCruz timely submitted the present appeal of the Selection Committee’s denial of the Amendment Application. (A copy of CannaCruz’s May 16, 2024, appeal of the Selection Committee’s denial is attached to this report for reference.)
Police Department Considerations
The Salinas Police Department issued three memoranda related to CannaCruz’s Amendment Application: February 26, 2024; March 16, 2024; and March 19, 2024. (The Police Department memoranda are attached to this report for reference.)
The February 26, 2024, Memorandum specifically addressed only the proposed parking layout at the 1228 South Main Street location and concluded there are “no issues with the parking lot layout.” The February 26, 2024, Memorandum did not address any other issues related to the proposed relocation, including the findings of the Police Chief pursuant to section 5-07.27(d) due to the proposed location’s adjacency to a residential use.

The March 16, 2024, Memorandum addressed the proposed parking reduction and proposed relocation of CannaCruz to 1228 South Main Street and concluded there are “no issues with the parking reduction or relocation of the dispensary.” The March 16, 2024, Memorandum further concluded that “[a]lthough the subject site is located adjacent to a residential areas, it is the opinion of the Chief of Police that the operation of a Commercial Cannabis business in such location would not tend to cause a public nuisance or a situation which may result in repeated police department response or a negative impact on the adjacent residential units as stipulated by Municipal Code Section 5-07.27(d).” Release of the March 16, 2024, Memorandum was an administrative error:

The Memorandum was not a final draft intended for distribution.

The March 19, 2024, Memorandum replaced the March 16, 2024, Memorandum and addressed the proposed parking reduction and relocation of CannaCruz to 1228 South Main Street location and concluded that there “are no issues with the parking reduction or relocation of the dispensary.” (emphasis in original) The March 19, 2024, Memorandum additionally, however, raised concerns with traffic volumes and a nearby intersection and driveway location which has had approximately eighteen traffic collisions, one being fatal. The March 19, 2024, Memorandum also raised concerns with criminal activity at other cannabis dispensaries in Salinas and elsewhere in Monterey County.

With respect to the proposed location’s adjacency to a residential use, the March 19. 2924, Memorandum concludes that in “the opinion of the Chief of Police…the operation of the Commercial Cannabis business in such location would tend to cause a public nuisance or a situation which may result in repeated police department response or a negative impact on the adjacent residential units as stipulated by Municipal Code Section 5-07.27(d).” Of concern to the Salinas Police Department is the proximity of the proposed location to two specific sensitive uses identified in the Salinas Municipal Code and the proposed location’s adjacency to a residential use. Elli’s Restaurant is immediately adjacent to the proposed location Page | 8
and includes a bar where alcoholic beverages are served. Elli’s Restaurant is a popular location for customers to gather in the bar area to drink alcohol, socialize, and watch sporting events. Alcoholic beverages are also served in the dining portion of the restaurant. The combination of an alcohol related use immediately adjacent to a commercial cannabis business creates the potential for foot traffic between the two locations, including foot traffic from intoxicated individuals along the sidewalk on South Main Street and through the driveway of the proposed location in order to gain access to the proposed location at the rear of the building. As discussed below, this portion of South Main Street contains a high-volume of vehicular traffic regularly traveling at speeds above the posted speed limit. Clout Nine Smoke Shop, a second sensitive use, is located within 1,000 feet of the proposed location.

The proposed location is directly adjacent to a residential apartment complex with ten second floor windows with a direct line of sight to the parking lot of the proposed commercial cannabis business. Customers are anticipated to each take approximately six minutes to complete their transactions which would result in vehicles potentially entering and exiting the parking lot each seven to eight minutes throughout the business’s hours of operation, driving along the fence separating the proposed location from the adjacent residential use. Depending on the hours of operation, this could mean that vehicles would be entering and exiting the proposed location during the nighttime hours which would require the use of vehicle headlights. This could result in light from the vehicles’ headlights shining into the apartment windows each time a vehicle entered of existed the parking lot. There is also other potential for customers entering and exiting their vehicles to create noise and other impacts on the adjacent residential use including, potentially, the use of cannabis projects in their vehicles and/or the parking lot of the proposed location. These conditions have the potential to create noise impacts on the adjacent residential use and the occupants of the residential units, some of which may be families with children.

There is only one narrow driveway entrance and exit to the proposed location; the narrow width of the driveway makes it difficult for two cars to fit and safely pass each other as they enter and exit the parking located at the rear of the building. The driveway to the proposed location is accessible only by way of southbound South Main Street (a high volume major arterial roadway that leads in one direction to Highway 68) and immediately south of the intersection of South Main Street and Plaza Circle. This location has had seven vehicle collisions in the last four years, one of which was a fatal collision between a vehicle and a cyclist. In the broader area from South Main Street at San Joaquin Street to South Main Street and Blanco Road, there have been eighteen collisions.

Customers of the proposed location would turn over in six-minute increments; customers are anticipated to each take approximately six minutes to complete their transactions. With the proposed location anticipated to be a high-volume business (a higher volume business than the previous furniture store use), that would mean that more customers/vehicles than have been present in the past would be entering and exiting the proposed location through a narrow driveway and narrow driveway entrance onto South Main Street every seven to eight minutes. This area of South Main Street has high volumes of traffic which regularly moves at speeds in excess of the posted speed limit (see attached CannaCruz Salinas Parking Demand Study from Rick Engineering Company dated February 9, 2024).

Page | 9
The conditions discussed above present a threat to the public health, safety, and welfare. It is anticipated that under these conditions establishment of the proposed commercial cannabis business at this proposed location would tend to cause a situation which may result in repeated police department response or a negative impact on the adjacent residential uses Time Consideration:

The project was deemed complete on November 18, 2023. Originally, final action was required by January 17, 2024, pursuant to CEQA Section 15107. As stated above, on December 29, 2023, the Applicant requested a 90-day time extension pursuant to Government Code Section 65957.

Per Government Code Section 65957, the new deadline for action was April 16, 2024. On April 3, 2024, the Salinas Planning Commission denied CUP 2022-048. On April 12, 2024, the Applicant appealed the Planning Commission’s denial of CUP 2022-048 to the Salinas City Council. On May 14, 2024, the Salinas Commercial Cannabis Permit Selection Committee denied CCP 2023-007. On May 16, 2024, the Applicant appealed the Salinas Commercial Cannabis Permit Selection Committee denial of CCP 2023-007 to the Salinas Planning Commission. On May 21, 2024, pursuant to Zoning Code Section 37-60.1300(a), the Applicant requested an extension to the hearing date for the appeal to the City Council to allow for both CUP 2022-048 and CCP 2023-007 to be considered on the same City Council hearing date. On June 5, 2024, the Salinas Planning Commission determined to neither affirm, reverse, or modify the Selection Committee’s determination on CCP 2023-007 and referred the Selection Committee’s determination and appeal thereof to the City Council for consideration.

Alternatives Available to the Council:

The City’s Selection Committee denied CannaCruz’s Amendment Application to relocate its commercial cannabis business to 1228 South Main Street. The reasons for the Selection Committee’s denial are described above and in the attached May 15, 2024, letter. CannaCruz appealed the Selection Committee’s denial to the Planning Commission and on June 5, 2024, the Planning Commission referred the appeal to the City Council.

The City Council is now asked to consider CannaCruz’s appeal of the Selection Committee’s denial. In doing so, the City Council should consider the City’s commercial cannabis regulations, including the regulations related to sensitive uses, and how the commercial cannabis regulations apply to CannaCruz’s application to relocate and operate a commercial cannabis business at 1228 South Main Street. The City Council should consider the information presented in this report and the information presented to it during the public hearing on this appeal and should then exercise its discretion and render a decision supported by specifically articulated findings.

The City Council has the following alternatives:

1. Affirm the determination made by the Selection Committee to deny CannaCruz’s application for a major amendment to Commercial Cannabis Permit 2023-007;

2. Reverse the determination made by the Selection Committee to deny CannaCruz’s application for a major amendment to Commercial Cannabis Permit 2023-007; Page | 10

3. Modify the determination made by the Selection Committee to deny CannaCruz’s application for a major amendment to Commercial Cannabis Permit 2023-007.

Following City Council’s determination, a Resolution consistent with the City Council’s determination will be prepared and brought back to the City Council at a subsequent meeting for consideration and approval.

Findings.

When considering CannaCruz’s appeal and exercising its independent discretion in making a determination supported by specifically articulated findings, the City Council should consider the following:

1. With respect to the proximity of the proposed location to sensitive uses, the City Council may make findings that, based on the information presented to the City Council during its public hearing on the appeal, even though the proposed location is located within 1,000 feet of sensitive uses the intent of the City’s commercial cannabis regulations may otherwise be met. In other words, the City Council could find that even though the proposed location is within 1,000 feet of several alcohol-related uses, a religious assembly use, and a smoke shop the establishment of a commercial cannabis business at the proposed location would not have a negative impact on the health, safety, and welfare of the general public; would not create negative effects on neighboring properties or businesses; and, would otherwise be consistent with the purpose and the intent of the City’s commercial cannabis regulations:
a. [To] promote the development of businesses in the commercial cannabis industry in a responsible manner while imposing regulations to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the residents, neighborhoods, and businesses of Salinas. b. [To] accommodate the needs of medically ill persons that require treatment with medicinal cannabis and medicinal cannabis products.
c. [To] regulate the personal non-medicinal use and consumption of cannabis and cannabis products in a manner consistent with state law. d. [To] regulate cannabis activity in the City of Salinas concurrently with the State of California.

2. With respect to the adjacency of the proposed location to a residential zoning district, the City Council may make findings that even though the proposed location is adjacent to a residential zoning district, based on the information presented to the City Council during its public hearing on the appeal, the operation of a commercial cannabis business at this location would not tend to cause a public nuisance or a situation which may result in repeated police department response or a negative impact on the adjacent residential use.

Page | 11
CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Not a Project. The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).

In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ATTACHMENTS:

Draft Conditional Use Permit 2022-048 approval document with the following exhibits:

Exhibit "A" Vicinity Map
Exhibit "B" Site Map (Sheet A0.0)
Exhibit "C" Site Plan (Sheet A1.0)
Exhibit "D" Existing Floor Plan (Sheet A2.0)
Exhibit "E" Proposed Floor Plan (Sheet A2.1)
Exhibit “F” Exterior Elevations (Sheet A4.0)
Exhibit “G” Landscape, Fencing, and Bicycle Parking Details (Sheet A9.0) Exhibit “H” Conceptual Landscape Plans (Sheet L1.0)
Exhibit "I" Engineer’s Report dated March 6, 2024
Exhibit "J" Police Department comments dated March 19, 2024 Exhibit “K” Permit Center comments dated February 28, 2024 Exhibit "L" CannaCruz Salinas Parking Demand Study dated February 9, 2024 Exhibit “M” Alternative Means of Compliance for Landscaping Draft Commercial Cannabis Permit 2023-007 approval document CannaCruz Salinas Parking Demand Study from Rick Engineering Company dated February 9, 2024
December 15, 2021, Zoning Information Letter from Adam Garrett to Grant Palmer Commercial Cannabis Permit 2023-003
Ordinance No. 2566 (N.C.S.) and Report to the City Council dated January 26, 2016 Ordinance No. 2597 (N.C.S.) and Report to the City Council dated August 15, 2017 Ordinance No. 2598 (N.C.S.) and Report to the City Council dated September 5, 2017 Ordinance No. 2600 (N.C.S.) and Report to the City Council dated November 7, 2017 June 5, 2024 Planning Commission Staff Report without exhibits June 5, 2024 Planning Commission unofficial minutes
June 4, 2024 Letter from JRG Attorneys at Law appealing Planning Commission denial of CCP 2023-007
June 4, 2024 Letter from Walker+Reed Attorneys at Law opposing CCP 2023-007 May 21, 2024, Email from Trinh Retterer to Christopher Callihan re CCP 2023-007 Amendment Appeal and extending appeal deadline for CUP 2022-048
Page | 12
May 16, 2024, Email (with attached Development Review Application) from Trinh Retterer to City Attorney re CCP 2023-007 Amendment Appeal
May 15, 2024, Letter from City Attorney to Trinh Retterer and Peter D. Brazil re Commercial Cannabis Permit (CCP 2023-007) Major Amendment: Selection Committee Review; Notice of Denial
May 7, 2024, Letter from City Attorney to Trinh Retterer re Commercial Cannabis Permit (CCP 2023-007) Major Amendment
Request for Amendment to Commercial Cannabis Permit (CCP) dated April 29, 2024 (with attachments)
April 17, 2024, Letter from Peter D. Brazil to Lisa Brinton re Conditional Use Permit CUP 2022- 048 Appeal of Planning Commission Decision
April 12, 2024, Letter of Appeal of Planning Commission denial of CUP 2022-048 from JRG Attorneys at Law
April 3, 2024 Planning Commission Staff Report without exhibits April 3, 2024 Planning Commission Official Minutes
Planning Commission Resolution 2024-04
April 3, 2024 CannaCruz CUP 2022-048 Letter to Planning Commission April 2, 2024 Walker+Reed Attorneys at Law Letter opposing CUP 2022-048 and CCP 2023-007 Comments from the Salinas Police Department dated February 26, 2024, March 16, 2024, and March 19, 2024
December 29, 2024 Letter from JRG Attorneys at Law requesting extension to the Permit Streamlining Act for CUP 2022-048
June 9, 2024 Letter of Opposition from Charlie Sammut
Public Correspondence concerning proposed projects dated March 26, 2024 to April 1, 2024 Correspondence from Elli’s Restaurant dated January 12 and 16, 2024 Correspondence from Dr. Ronconi dated December 4, 2023 to January 11, 2024 Sensitive Use for Cannabis Map for 1228 South Main Street CannaCruz Employee Handbook
CannaCruz Operations Manual for Salinas
CannaCruz Salinas Pro Forma
CannaCruz Salinas Security Plan
Cc: CannaCruz, Inc., Applicant
Trinh Retterer and Peter D. Brazil, JRG Attorneys at Law Samuel and Marguerite Kobrinsky, Trustees, Property Owner Other Interested Parties
I:\ComDev\Planning Share Space\Conditional Use Permits\2022 CUP's\CUP 2022-048 - 1228 S Main St\06-18-24 CC Materials\06-18-24 CCP 2023-007 CC Appeal Staff Report.docx

Page 1 of 19 ends

COMMERCIAL CANNABIS PERMIT (CCP) 2023-007
(Amends CCP 2023-003)
City of Salinas
WHEREAS, the City of Salinas has adopted Chapter 5, Article VII of its City Code to allow for the operation of commercial cannabis activity within the City of Salinas; and WHEREAS, the City accepted applications for commercial cannabis businesses in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 5, Article VII; and WHEREAS, the City of Salinas granted and issued Commercial Cannabis Business Permit No. 2017-001 pursuant to Chapter 5, Article VII of the Salinas City Code and upon the terms and conditions listed therein; and
WHEREAS, on December 28, 2017, CCP 2017-001 was amended to allow for adult-use cannabis business (First Amended CCP 2017-001); and
WHEREAS, on November 13, 2018, the First Amended CCP 2017-001 was amended to allow for additional time for the business to obtain permits and complete work at the approved premises; and
WHEREAS, on May 23, 2019, a Certificate of Occupancy was issued for the premises of East of Eden, marking the effective date of CCP 2017-001; and WHEREAS, on March 18, 2020, Canna Cruz filed a request to amend CCP 2017-001 and the City of Salinas granted Commercial Cannabis Business Permit No. 2020-013 on May 23, 2020 pursuant to Chapter 5, Article VII of the Salinas City Code and upon the terms and conditions listed in the permit and not otherwise; and
WHEREAS, on June 15, 2021, Canna Cruz filed a request to amend CCP 2020-13 and the City of Salinas granted Commercial Cannabis Business Permit No. 2021-003 on June 23, 2021 pursuant to Chapter 5, Article VII of the Salinas City Code and upon the terms and conditions listed in the permit and not otherwise; and
WHEREAS, on April 8, 2022, Canna Cruz filed a request to amend CCP 2021-003 and the City of Salinas granted Commercial Cannabis Business Permit No. 2022-005 on June 30, 2022 pursuant to Chapter 5, Article VII of the Salinas City Code and upon the terms and conditions listed in the permit and not otherwise; and
WHEREAS, on February 28, 2023, Canna Cruz filed a request to amend CCP 2022-003 and the City of Salinas granted Commercial Cannabis Business Permit No. 2023-003 on May 23, 2023 pursuant to Chapter 5, Article VII of the Salinas City Code and upon the terms and conditions listed in the permit and not otherwise; and

Page 2 of 19 ends

WHEREAS, on June 23, 2023, Canna Cruz filed an Amendment to CCP 2023-003 pursuant to City Code Section 5-07.09 to relocate the business location of CCP 2023-003 from 1156 Abbott Street (APN: 002-881-057-00) to 1228 South Main Street (APN: 016-161-052-000); and
WHEREAS, on August 23, 2022, Canna Cruz applied for related Conditional Use Permit 2022-048 (CUP 2022-048) to change the use from Retail to a proposed two-tenant Shopping Center within an existing 20,162 square-foot building to include a 9,413 square-foot furniture store retail use in the front portion and a 10,749 square-foot Cannabis Dispensary with accessory Delivery and Distribution retail use in the rear portion.

WHEREAS, related CUP 2022-048 also includes a 41-space (51%) Parking Reduction per Zoning Code Table 37-50.10, exception from the requirements of Zoning Code Section 37-

50.200 to allow for internal waste storage to be located within the existing structure, and Alternative Means of Compliance for landscaping; and
WHEREAS, on March 20, 2024, a duly noticed public hearing was scheduled for the Salinas Planning Commission to consider Commercial Cannabis Business Permit 2023-007 (CCP 2023-007) along with related CUP 2022-048; and
WHEREAS, to ensure the complete processing of CCP 2023-007 and CUP 2022-048, the applications were continued to the April 3, 2024 Planning Commission meeting; and WHEREAS, it was determined due to concerns with the completeness of the application for CCP 2023-007, it was not presented for consideration at the April, 3, 2024 Planning Commission hearing; and
WHEREAS, on May 14, 2024, a duly noticed hearing was scheduled for the Salinas Commercial Cannabis Selection Committee to consider CCP 2023-007; and WHEREAS, on May 14, 2024, the Salinas Commercial Cannabis Selection Committee denied CCP 2023-007; and
WHEREAS, on May 16, 2024, the Applicant appealed the Salinas Commercial Cannabis Permit Selection Committee denial of CCP 2023-007 to the Salinas Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, on June 5, 2024, the Salinas Planning Commission determined to neither affirm, reverse, or modify the Selection Committee’s determination on CCP 2023-007 and referred the Selection Committee’s determination and appeal thereof to the City Council for consideration; and
WHEREAS, on June 18, 2024, at a duly noticed public hearing, the Salinas City Council determined that the related Conditional Use Permit 2022-048 (CUP 2022-048) to be categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and approved CUP 2022-048 pursuant to the terms and conditions of the permit; and

Page 3 of 19 ends

WHEREAS, on June 18, 2024, at a duly noticed public hearing the Salinas City Council also considered Commercial Cannabis Permit 2023-007 (CUP 2023-007); and WHEREAS, pursuant to City Code Section 5-07.08, the City Council has reviewed the amended CCP application.

WHEREAS, pursuant to City Code Section 5-07.09(a)(2), the City Council has reviewed the proposed new business location and has made the following findings:
a. Even though the new site is located within the sensitive distances specified in City Code Section 5-07.27, an exception has been approved pursuant to this Section; b. The relocation of the new site would not create any significant negative impacts greater than those that existing at the original site;
c. The proposed location is located in an appropriate Zoning District for the proposed use; and
d. Owners of real property located within 300-feet of the proposed site have been notified and have had the opportunity to provide information to the City regarding the proposed site.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Salinas hereby amends CCP 2023-003 by granting and issuing this Commercial Cannabis Business Permit No. 2023-007 pursuant to Chapter 5, Article VII of the Salinas City Code and upon the following terms and conditions and not otherwise, to wit:

ISSUED TO (“Permittee”): Bradford Palmer & Grant Palmer Dba Canna Cruz
FOR USE: Dispensary
WITH ACCESSORY USE(S): Delivery & Distribution (Non-Third Party) FOR TYPE(S): Adult-Use & Medicinal
ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT: 1228 South Main Street, Salinas, California ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 016-161-052-000
EXPIRATION DATE: This Permit shall expire 12 months from the Effective Date.

Page 4 of 19 ends

RIGHT TO OPERATE
The Permittee shall have the right to operate a Commercial Cannabis Business— Dispensary on the above described property in accordance with this Permit. In addition, the Permittee shall have the right to make deliveries to customers at locations other than the Dispensary storefront.

GENERAL CONDITIONS

1. Permittee may conduct business in either the medicinal (“M”-Type) or adult-use (“A”-Type) markets.

2. Cannabis shall not be smoked, ingested, or otherwise consumed on the premises (“Premises” shall mean 1228 South Main Street, Salinas, California).

3. Per SMC Section 5-07.22, alcoholic beverages shall not be sold, dispensed, or consumed on the premises. Consumption of alcohol on the premises during nonbusiness hours is permissible provided that no alcohol is stored at the site, consumption shall be limited to invited guests at private events, and no monetary or any other form of compensation shall be collected to attend the event or partake in the consumption of alcohol or any other event activities. Service of alcohol shall comply with any and all requirements of the Bureau of Alcoholic Beverage Control, including any requirement to obtain any necessary permits.

4. In general, no person under the age of twenty-one (21) years shall be allowed within the building where cannabis is distributed or sold, except that persons who are at least eighteen (18) years of age and possess a valid physician’s recommendation may be allowed access for the purpose of purchasing medicinal cannabis and cannabis products. Additionally, persons under the age of eighteen (18) who are qualified patients may be allowed in those areas where cannabis is sold or otherwise distributed to qualified patients provided they are accompanied by a person with a valid caregiver’s card. Persons under the age of eighteen (18) years who do not meet the requirements specified above may be allowed in those areas where cannabis is neither sold nor otherwise distributed, provided they are accompanied by a parent or legal guardian. These requirements shall be clearly and legibly posted near the entrance to the Dispensary.

5. Per SMC Section 5-07.29, there shall not be a physician located in or on the premises at any time for the purpose of evaluating patients for the issuance of a medical marijuana recommendation or card.

Page 5 of 19 ends

6. Per SMC Section 5-07.39(g), prior to dispensing medicinal cannabis or medicinal cannabis products to any person, the business shall obtain additional voice verification from the recommending physician’s office that the person requesting cannabis or cannabis products is a qualified patient.

7. Per SMC Section 5-07.29, this Permit and any other Permits or licenses issued to the business from a government agency shall be conspicuously displayed in an interior location of the premises in an area which has patient access.

8. Per SMC Section 5-07.18, the Permittee shall maintain a City of Salinas business license, pay all applicable fees, charges, and taxes, and comply with all applicable provisions and requirements of that business license.

9. Per SMC Section 5-07.15, the Permittee shall pay any applicable taxes and fees, whether federal, state, or local.

10. Per SMC Section 5-07.33, the Permittee shall collect all sales and uses taxes and/or transaction taxes required under local and/or state law, and shall remit those monies to the State of California for disbursement to the City of Salinas in accordance with established reporting principles. Any tax that has not been remitted to the City shall be deemed a debt owed to state agencies and/or the City of Salinas by the person required to collect and remit the tax.

11. This Permit does not vest in any person a property right or other vested right. This Permit confers the privilege to operate a Commercial Cannabis Business for a limited term pursuant to the terms and the conditions of this Permit and of all applicable laws, rules, and regulations. Failure to comply with one or more of the terms and conditions of this Permit or any applicable law, rule, or regulation shall be grounds for immediate revocation of this Permit.

12. If the Commercial Cannabis Permit (CCP) was granted on the basis of false material information, written or oral, given willfully or negligently by the applicant, this Permit shall be immediately revoked.

13. Per SMC Section 5-07.16, violations of SMC Chapter 5, Article VII are deemed unlawful and a public nuisance. If business activity at the premises results in a public nuisance, the Permittees may be subject to injunctive relief and/or revocation of the CCP.

14. Per SMC Section 5-07.08(a), this Permit shall expire one year after the date on which it becomes effective. Application for renewal shall be filed with the Community Development Department no later than 60 days prior to the expiration

Page 6 of 19 ends

date of this Permit. In the event this Permit is not amended in a timely manner, the Permittee shall immediately cease all operations commenced pursuant to this Permit. No extensions to this Permit or to the deadline to submit an application for renewal will be considered or granted. Subject to applicable laws, applications for renewal will be evaluated based solely upon the Permittee’s compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and Permit conditions (including the conditions of this Permit), and shall not be affected by outside actions such as the establishment of a new sensitive use within 1,000 feet of the site, proposals for cannabis businesses by other operators or at other sites, or any other concerns not related to operations at the subject site.

15. Per SMC Section 5-07.23, this CCP is granted only to the below-signed Permittee(s) for the site defined herein. This Permit shall not be amendable to any other site or to any other person. For purposes of this Permit, “person” shall include an individual or any entity. No person shall operate a commercial cannabis business under this Permit at any place or at any location other than that identified on the Permit. No person shall amend ownership or control of this commercial cannabis business or amend this Permit unless the Permittee first obtains the consent of the City and otherwise meets the requirements for the amend under the City Code. Any attempt to amend this Permit without the City’s prior consent will render this Permit immediately void and revoked and no longer of any force or effect and the commercial cannabis business must immediately cease operations.

The Permittee may not assign this Permit or any of the privileges granted hereunder to any other person or entity or allow any other person or entity to operate the commercial cannabis business established pursuant to this Permit.

16. Per SMC Section 5-07.07, no person who has been convicted of a felony or crime of moral turpitude within the past ten years may be engaged (actively or passively) in the operation of any commercial cannabis business, unless the felony or crime is exempted from this restriction as described in SMC Section 5-07.07(b).

17. Per SMC Section 5-07.09, any change as to which individuals are listed as the Permittees of the CCP shall be requested in the form of a permit amendment request. Such requests shall be reviewed by the City’s Cannabis Selection Committee, who shall reject or approve the request based on findings that the new Permittee(s) would comply with the business’s operating requirements and would possess the expertise and ability to operate the business.

Page 7 of 19 ends

NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY/ENVIRONMENT

18. Per SMC Section 5-07.33, sales of cannabis and cannabis products at the Dispensary location shall occur only between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 9:00 p.m.

Monday through Sunday.

19. The Permittee shall maintain the premises’ parking areas, driveways, accessways and grounds, landscaped areas, and exterior building surfaces in accordance with all applicable regulations, as required by the SMC. The premises shall be maintained free of weeds, litter, and debris. Traffic signs and pavement markings shall be maintained to be clear and legible.

20. Per SMC Section 5-07.29(b), any outdoor storage, display, or sale of merchandise of any kind is prohibited.

21. Per SMC Section 5-07.29(a), no cannabis or cannabis products or graphics depicting cannabis or cannabis products shall be visible from the exterior of the property. All signage proposed for the premises shall be subject to the prior review and approval of the City.

22. Per SMC Section 5-07.33, any cannabis or cannabis product must be in an opaque (non-see-through) package, such as a bag, before it leaves the commercial cannabis business.

23. Per SMC Section 5-07.29, odor prevention devices and techniques, such as a ventilation system with a carbon filter, shall be incorporated to ensure that odors from cannabis are not detectable offsite. Commercial cannabis businesses shall provide a sufficient odor absorbing ventilation and exhaust system so that odor generated inside the facility that is distinctive to its operation is not detected outside of the facility, anywhere on adjacent property or public rights-of-way, on or about the exterior or interior common area walkways, hallways, breezeways, foyers, lobby areas or any other areas available for use by common tenants or the visiting public, or within any other unit located inside the same building as the commercial cannabis business. As such, commercial cannabis businesses must install and maintain the following equipment or any other equipment which the City Manager or his/her designee determines has the same or better effectiveness:
a. An exhaust air filtration system with odor control that prevents internal odors from being emitted externally; and
b. An air system that creates negative air pressure between the commercial cannabis business’s interior and exterior so that the odors generated inside

Page 8 of 19 ends

the commercial cannabis business are not detectable on the outside of the commercial cannabis business.

24. The Permittee must maintain all weighing devices in compliance with local, state or federal law.

25. The Permittee must follow all local, state and federal requirements for waste disposal. Any waste including cannabis product must be stored in a secure location on-site until disposed of in a legal fashion.

POINT-OF-SALE REQUIRMENTS

26. Per SMC Section 5-07.41, the business shall not make any deliveries within 1,000 feet of any school, park, or daycare center, except that deliveries may be made to an individual at their place of residence.

27. Per State Law (Section 5417 of the Bureau of Cannabis Control Order of Adoption), vehicles used for deliveries to consumers shall not have any marking or other indications on the exterior of the vehicle that may indicate that the delivery employee is carrying cannabis goods for delivery. Only the Permittee or an employee of the Permittee shall be in the delivery vehicle. Cannabis goods shall not be left unattended in a motor vehicle unless the motor vehicle is locked and equipped with an active vehicle alarm system. The Permittee shall comply with all other applicable State requirements of the Bureau of Cannabis Control regarding cannabis delivery.

28. Per SMC Section 5-07.41(b), the business shall verify the identity of delivery customers via the presentation of a valid identification card issued by a governmental agency that includes the recipient’s name, date of birth, and photograph (unless the State of California designates alternative forms of identification to be acceptable for this purpose).

29. Per SMC Section 5-07.41(c), the Permittee shall not deliver any cannabis or cannabis products to any person under the age of 21 years, except a person with an identification card. Deliveries shall be made directly to the person placing the request for delivery and may not be delivered to another individual at the site, except that deliveries to a caretaker are permitted, and deliveries to a minor may be made to that minor’s parents or legal guardians.

30. Per SMC Section 5-07.41(d), prior to the sale of any cannabis or cannabis product to a minor, the delivery company shall obtain the consent of the minor’s parents or legal guardians. This may include a one-time blanket approval provided that the terms of the approval are clearly articulated.

31. Per SMC Section 5-07.39(c), any cannabis or cannabis product must be in an

Page 9 of 19 ends

opaque (non-see-through) package, such as a bag, at the time of delivery.

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

32. A list of all hazardous materials which will be stored or utilized on site shall be provided to the Salinas Fire Chief. This list shall include the amount and methods of storage of these materials. Prior to the commencement of cannabis activity, the Fire Chief shall ensure that the Permittee has obtained all required Permits necessary. At any time between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. and without notice, the Fire Chief and/or his/her designee may enter the premises for the purpose of observing compliance with applicable regulations regarding the handling and use of hazardous materials.

SITE SECURITY

33. Per SMC Section 5-07.24, the Permittee shall be responsible and liable for safety and security in and around the commercial cannabis operation, and shall provide adequate security on the premises, including lighting and alarms, to ensure the safety of persons and to protect the premises from theft and other crimes. The Permittee shall maintain the following security measures, unless otherwise determined by the Chief of Police. The City and the Salinas Police Department are also authorized to require additional security measures as deemed necessary. a. The site shall be monitored at all times. This may be accomplished by installing HD security cameras which may be accessed remotely in realtime by the Salinas Police Department. The Permittee shall work with the Salinas Police Department to ensure the video feed is compatible with Police Department software/hardware. Site Monitoring shall include external and internal areas, including all doors, windows, and vehicle entrances/exits. Video and other records shall be preserved for a minimum of forty-five (45) days.
b. Entrances into the dispensary shall be locked at all times with entry strictly controlled. A "buzz-in" electronic/mechanical entry system shall be utilized to limit access to and entry to the dispensary to separate it from the reception/lobby area. Individuals must show valid identification in order to gain access into the dispensary.
c. Whenever the business or any other party is engaged in loading and unloading of vehicles for the distribution of cannabis, cannabis products, and/or cash to and from the site, a minimum of one security guard shall be present to observe the amend of the cannabis, cannabis product, or cash between the delivering vehicle and the building. This guard shall be

Page 10 of 19 ends

equipped with gear that enables the guard to immediately contact law enforcement as necessary. The business shall maintain a loading area either within the building, an enclosed and secure fenced area, or, if these are infeasible, as close as possible to the building entrance to minimize the amount of transport through the parking lot. Loading and unloading shall not occur from adjacent properties without the prior approval of the property owner.
d. All restroom facilities shall remain locked and under the control of management.
e. Windows shall be secured to prevent unauthorized break-ins – any bars or other physical barrier devices shall be installed in the interior of the building and shall comply with Fire Code requirements.
f. Security systems shall be designed to continue all operations during power outages.
g. Panic buttons shall be installed throughout the facility as deemed necessary h. A minimum of one uniformed security guard shall be present at the premises during business hours so as to maintain a clear view of the parking area and the building entrance, in order to ensure the safety of patients. i. The premises shall be adequately screened and/or fenced to ensure that nearby businesses and properties are not otherwise affected by the operations of the Commercial Cannabis Business.
j. The Permittee shall maintain adequate parking on the site of the premises and make such parking available for patrons of the commercial cannabis business. The Permittee shall ensure that the operations of the Commercial Cannabis Business do not affect the parking lots of other nearby businesses. k. All cannabis product shall be stored in a locked room, safe, or vault. If the product is stored in a room or vault, said room or vault shall be reinforced or otherwise protected so that access may not be gained through the application of force equal or lessor to that produced by a vehicle collision.

If the product is stored in a safe, the safe shall be secured so as to prevent the safe from being removed from the site.
l. Individuals not involved in the cannabis business shall be escorted from the site immediately.

Page 11 of 19 ends

m. The plans shall include procedures detailing the handling of cash on-site.

Said plan shall include the range of cash expected at the site daily; the number of deposits made each day; procedures for making deposits, including personnel involved; whether employees are paid in cash and, if so, when these payments occur; and the amount of cash expected to be stored on-site overnight. Cash stored overnight in excess of $500 shall be stored in a locked room, safe, or vault. If the product is stored in a room or vault, said room or vault shall be reinforced or otherwise protected so that access may not be gained through the application of force equal or lessor to that produced by vehicle collision. If the product is stored in a safe, the safe shall be secured so as to prevent the safe from being removed from the site.

34. Per SMC Section 5-07.19, the Permittee shall keep accurate records of its commercial cannabis activities pursuant to the requirements of the California Business and Professions Code, as it may be amended from time-to-time.

35. Per SMC Section 5-07.24, the Permittee shall notify the Salinas Police Department and the Community Development Department within 24 hours after discovering any of the following: diversion, theft, loss, or any criminal activity involving the commercial cannabis operation; the less or unauthorized alteration of records related to cannabis, registering qualifying patients, primary caregivers, or employees or agents of the commercial cannabis business; or any other breach of security.

36. Per SMC Section 5-07.24(b), the Permittee shall designate a liaison to the Police Department who will be responsible for managing communications regarding all security matters. This person shall be reasonably available to the Police Department or to City Staff regarding security measures.

37. Per SMC Section 5-07.20(a), at any time during hours of operation and without notice, City officials may enter the premises for the purpose of observing compliance of the commercial cannabis operation, including access to and inspection of the commercial cannabis operation’s records, books, accounts, financial data, and any and all data relevant to its Permitted activities for the purpose of conducting an audit or examination. It is unlawful for any person having any responsibility over a commercial cannabis operation to refuse to allow, impede, obstruct, or interfere with an inspection, or the review of the copying of records and monitoring (including recordings) including, but not limited to, the concealment, destruction, and falsification of any recordings or records.

38. The Chief of Police shall make the determination whether any measure taken in accordance with this section of the Permit has been done in an appropriate manner.

Page 12 of 19 ends

If, in the opinion of the Chief of Police, the measures taken do not provide an acceptable level of security, the Chief of Police may immediately suspend or revoke this Permit. Upon such suspension or revocation, the Permittee shall immediately cease all operations commenced pursuant to this Permit.

PATIENT SAFETY/PRODUCT INTEGRITY

39. The Permittee shall comply with all state and local regulations regarding product safety.

40. All cannabis and cannabis products sold shall have been cultivated, manufactured, and transported by licensed facilities that maintain operations in full conformance with the state and local regulations.

41. Per SMC Section 5-07.19(d), subject to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA) regulations, each business shall allow City officials to have access to the Commercial Cannabis Business’s books, records, accounts, and any and all data relevant to its Permitted activities for the purpose of conducting an audit or examination. Books, records, accounts, and any and all relevant data will be produced no later than twenty-four (24) hours after receipt of the City’s request.

42. Businesses shall maintain an inventory control and reporting system that accurately documents the present location, amounts, and descriptions of all cannabis and cannabis products for all stages of the growing and production or manufacturing process until purchase in accordance with applicable law. Such records will be made available to the City for inspection upon request.

43. The Permittee shall adhere to State requirements of the California Cannabis Trackand-Trace System.

44. Per SMC Section 5-07.39(e), the business shall make all records related to testing laboratory results for the cannabis or cannabis product being delivered available to the consumer upon request.

45. Per SMC Section 5-07.44, all manufactured cannabis products shall be individually wrapped at the original point of preparation. Packaging shall, at a minimum, include the elements as specified in California Business and Professions Code section 26120, as the same may be amended from time-to-time or superseded or replaced by subsequent state legislation or by any department or division of the state of California.

Page 13 of 19 ends

46. All food products, food storage facilities, food-related utensils, equipment and materials shall be approved, used, managed and handled in accordance to the provisions of the California Retail Food Code, California Health and Safety Code sections 113700 - 114437. All food products shall be protected from contamination at all times, and all food handlers must be clean, in good health and free from communicable diseases. The Monterey County Environmental Health Bureau may inspect the commercial cannabis business at any time during business hours to ensure compliance with this section.

47. Per State law (California Business and Professions Code Section 26000 – 26250), the business shall comply with all State regulatory requirements for product packaging, including the following minimum requirements:
a. Prior to delivery or sale, cannabis and cannabis products shall be labeled and placed in a resealable, tamper-evident, child-resistant package and shall include a unique identifier for the purposes of identifying and tracking cannabis and cannabis products.
b. Packages and labels shall not be made to be attractive to children. c. All cannabis and cannabis product labels and inserts shall include the following information prominently displayed in a clear and legible fashion in accordance with the requirements, including font size, prescribed by the bureau or by the State Department of Public Health:

C(1). Labels for cannabis shall include the following information displayed in a clear and legible font:

C(1)(a) “GOVERNMENT WARNING: THIS PACKAGE CONTAINS
CANNABIS, A SCHEDULE I CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE. KEEP
OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN AND ANIMALS. CANNABIS MAY
ONLY BE POSSESSED OR CONSUMED BY PERSONS 21 YEARS OF
AGE OR OLDER UNLESS THE PERSON IS A QUALIFIED PATIENT.

CANNABIS USE WHILE PREGNANT OR BREASTFEEDING MAY BE
HARMFUL. CONSUMPTION OF CANNABIS IMPAIRS YOUR
ABILITY TO DRIVE AND OPERATE MACHINERY. PLEASE USE
EXTREME CAUTION.”

C(1)(b) Labels for cannabis products shall include the following information displayed in a clear and legible font:
“GOVERNMENT WARNING: THIS PRODUCT CONTAINS
CANNABIS, A SCHEDULE I CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE. KEEP
OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN AND ANIMALS. CANNABIS

PRODUCTS MAY ONLY BE POSSESSED OR CONSUMED BY

Page 14 of 19 ends

PERSONS 21 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER UNLESS THE PERSON IS
A QUALIFIED PATIENT. THE INTOXICATING EFFECTS OF
CANNABIS PRODUCTS MAY BE DELAYED UP TO TWO HOURS.

CANNABIS USE WHILE PREGNANT OR BREASTFEEDING MAY BE
HARMFUL. CONSUMPTION OF CANNABIS PRODUCTS IMPAIRS
YOUR ABILITY TO DRIVE AND OPERATE MACHINERY. PLEASE
USE EXTREME CAUTION.”
C(2) For packages containing only dried flowers, the net weight; (C)(3) Identification of the source and date of cultivation, the type of cannabis or cannabis product and the date of manufacturing and packaging; (C)(4) The appellation of origin, if any;
(C)(5) A list of pharmacologically active ingredients, including, but not limited to, tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), cannabidiol (CBD), and other cannabinoid amount in milligrams per serving, servings per package, and the THC and other cannabinoid amount in milligrams for the package total. (C)(6) A warning if nuts or other known allergens are used. (C)(7) Information associated with the unique identifier issued by the Department of Food and Agriculture.
(C)(8) For a medicinal cannabis product sold at a retailer, the statement “FOR MEDICAL USE ONLY.”
(C)(9) Any other requirement set by the bureau or the State Department of Public Health.
d. Only generic food names may be used to describe the ingredients in edible cannabis products.
e. In the event the Attorney General determines that cannabis is no longer a Schedule I controlled substance under federal law, the label prescribed in subdivision (C) shall no longer require a statement that cannabis is a Schedule I controlled substance.

48. Per SMC Section 5-07.39(d), no edible cannabis products requiring refrigeration or hot-holding shall be sold or distributed. Baked products (e.g., brownies, bars, cookies, cakes), tinctures, and other non-refrigerated type items may be sold.

Page 15 of 19 ends

49. Per SMC Section 5-07.19(f), business records shall be maintained by the Permittee for a period of not less than seven years. Such records shall be made available for inspection consistent with California Business and Professions Code Section 26160 and any additional rules promulgated by the licensing authority pursuant to that section or the city council by resolution or ordinance.

LABOR & EMPLOYMENT

50. Any person who is an employee or who otherwise works or volunteers for the Permittee shall obtain a Work Permit in accordance with the requirements of the SMC, Section 5-07.25. No person under the age of 21 years of age shall be eligible for a Work Permit.

51. If, during the term of employment, an employee is charged with a felony or crime of moral turpitude, that employee shall immediately have their duties restricted to roles which do not involve the handling of any cannabis product, any access to financial records, or any opportunity to access inventory records, unless they are under the in-person supervision of a manager or principal that has not been accused of any felony or crime involving moral turpitude. A charge for transporting cannabis or cannabis products to or from a legally licensed and/or permitted cannabis business shall not be considered when implementing this paragraph.

Employees that are convicted or plead no contest to a charge of the same shall be immediately barred from performing any duties and their employment shall be promptly terminated in accordance with applicable laws. The business shall notify the Chief of Police in writing within 10 days of becoming aware that an employee has been charged or convicted of a felony or crime of moral turpitude. This permit may be immediately revoked and of no longer any force or effect.

52. Employees shall not consume or be under the influence of any controlled substances during work hours, unless a valid prescription from a medical professional has first been obtained.

53. To the extent permitted by law, the Permittee shall prioritize the hiring of employees from within the City of Salinas, within the Salinas Valley, and within Monterey County, in that order. The business shall annually include with any application for a renewal a list of the number of employees currently hired, the average and median hourly wages for all employees, and the zip codes of employees at the time of hire.

54. The Permittee shall provide compensation to its employees equal to or greater than that described in its application to the City.

Page 16 of 19 ends

PERMIT NOT TO SUPERSEDE OTHER REQUIRED LICENSING OR PERMITS

55. The Permit does not constitute a land-use entitlement or any other vested right and shall not absolve the Permittee of any requirements to obtain any reviews or Permits by the City’s Community Development Department. Said reviews or Permits may include, but are not limited to, Conditional Use Permits, Site Plan Reviews, Building Permits, and/or environmental analyses performed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Permittee shall obtain all necessary land use entitlements prior to beginning operations or performing any work on site.

56. When applicable, the Permittee must legally hold all required State Licenses under the Medicinal and Adult-Use Regulation and Safety Act, as it may be amended, and under all other applicable state laws. The issuance of this Permit shall not relieve the Permittee of any requirement to obtain Permits or licensing from any county, regional, or state agencies.

MODIFICATION OF APPROVED USE

57. Any modifications to the terms and conditions of this Permit are subject to the issuance of a new Permit. Modifications must be requested through the permit amendment process, as described in SMC Section 5-07.90.

PERMIT VALIDATION

58. This Permit shall be null and void and all terms and conditions shall have no force or effect unless this Permit is signed by the Permittee(s) and returned to City of Salinas Community Development Department.

STANDARD CONDITIONS

59. Pursuant to Salinas City Code Section 1-8.1: Civil action enforcement, and Section 1-8.2: Liability for costs, Permittee shall reimburse the City of Salinas for all costs and expenses (including but not limited to fees and charges of architects, engineers, attorneys, and other professionals, and court costs) incurred by the City in enforcing the provisions of this Permit.

60. The applicant(s) shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Salinas or any of its boards, commissions, agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City, its boards, commissions, agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul, the approval or the issuance of this Permit. The City shall promptly notify the Permittee of any such claim, action, or proceeding. The City shall cooperate in the defense. Nothing contained in this condition shall prohibit the City from participation in a defense of any claim, action,

Page 17 of 19 ends

or proceeding if the City bears its own attorney's fees and costs, and the City defends the action in good faith.

61. Notwithstanding any of the provisions in this Permit, the Permittee will at all times comply with all applicable laws and regulations, as the same may be promulgated, amended, or updated from time-to-time.

62. The City may in its discretion amend this Permit from time-to-time in order to address changes to the operations of the Commercial Cannabis Business or changes in applicable laws, rules, or regulations.

63. The Permittee understands and acknowledges that all principals named on this Permit, as well as all owners, managers, supervisors, or employees of the Commercial Cannabis Business, must complete a background check and all principals named on this Permit must clear the background check and meet the requirements of the Salinas Municipal Code. If one or more of the principals or other individuals either fails to complete a background check or fails the background check, this Permit shall become immediately null and void and revoked and the Commercial Cannabis Business must cease all operations permitted hereunder.

NOTICE OF CHALLENGE LIMITATIONS

64. Consistent with California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6, all Court challenges to the decision to issue this Permit must be initiated within 90 days of the date of issuance.

EXECUTIONS
THIS COMMERCIAL CANNABIS PERMIT was approved by action of the City of Salinas City Council on June 18, 2024 and shall become effective immediately pursuant to Salinas Municipal Code Section 5-07-09(d):

Effective Date: June 18, 2024 ___________________________________ Courtney Grossman
Planning Manager
(Signatures Listed Below on Pages 17 and 18 Must Be Notarized)

Page 18 of 19 ends

THIS COMMERCIAL CANNABIS PERMIT is hereby accepted upon the express terms and conditions hereof, and the undersigned Permittee agrees to strictly conform to and comply with each and all of this Permit's terms and conditions.

Dated:_______________ ___________________________
Bradford Palmer
Permittee
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF MONTEREY
On __________________ 202__, before me, _______________________, Notary Public, personally appeared _______________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature _________________________________

Page 19 of 19 ends

THIS COMMERCIAL CANNABIS PERMIT is hereby accepted upon the express terms and conditions hereof, and the undersigned Permittee agrees to strictly conform to and comply with each and all of this Permit's terms and conditions.

Dated:_______________ ___________________________
Grant Palmer
Permittee
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF MONTEREY
On __________________ 202__, before me, _______________________, Notary Public, personally appeared _______________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature _________________________________
I:\ComDev\Planning Share Space\Conditional Use Permits\2022 CUP's\CUP 2022-048 - 1228 S Main St\06-18-24 CC Materials\CCP 2023-007 - 06-18-24 Draft CC version.docx
February 9, 2024
Mr. Grant Palmer
CannaCruz, Inc.
115 Limekiln Street
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
SUBJECT: CANNACRUZ SALINAS PARKING DEMAND STUDY
(RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY JOB NUMBER 19633)

Dear Mr. Palmer:

Rick Engineering Company (RICK) has prepared this parking demand study to evaluate the parking requirement of the CannaCruz Salinas cannabis dispensary store, which proposes to relocate from its current site at 1156 Abbott Street in Salinas to a site located at 1228 South Main Street in Salinas.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
CannaCruz Salinas proposes to redevelop the existing former furniture store (Legacy Fine Furniture) in a 20,146 square-foot free-standing building located at 1228 South Main Street in Salinas. The existing CannaCruz Salinas cannabis dispensary store would be relocated from its current location at 1156 Abbott Street in Salinas to the proposed site at 1228 South Main Street. In addition, a furniture store use is proposed for the front half of the building. Below is a breakdown of the proposed uses and floor areas that would be provided within the 20,146 square-foot building:
• 5,726 square-foot cannabis dispensary
• 2,387 square-foot distribution area
• 2,660 square-foot employee area
• 9,373 square-foot furniture store
The hours of operation for the existing and proposed CannaCruz Salinas sites are from 8:30 AM to 9:00 PM Monday through Sunday. The hours of operation for the proposed furniture store are estimated to be from 10:00 AM to 5:00 PM Monday through Sunday.

The total estimated number of employees for the proposed cannabis dispensary is 20 employees, and a maximum of 7 employees are estimated to be on-site at one time. The total estimated number of employees for the proposed furniture store is 10 employees, and a maximum of 3 employees are estimated to be onsite at one time.

The project proposes to take full access from one driveway on Main Street. A total of 40 parking spaces are currently provided on the site, which includes two (2) ADA parking spaces. The project site plan is illustrated in Exhibit 1 following this letter.

Mr. Grant Palmer
February 9, 2024

Page 2 of 11 ends

EXISTING USE PARKING CONDITIONS
The existing former furniture store (Legacy Fine Furniture) was the original tenant/owner of the 20,146 square-foot building at 1228 South Main Street, and was required to provide a minimum of 34 parking spaces based on the City’s parking requirement for a furniture store use (1 space per 600 square-feet) per Section 37-50.350 of the City of Salinas Municipal Code (Basic Requirements for Off-Street Parking and Loading). The existing 40 parking spaces on the site exceeds the City’s minimum parking requirement by 6 parking spaces.

Table 1 below summarizes the minimum required parking spaces for the existing former furniture store use based on the City’s off-street parking requirement per Section 37-50.350 of the City of Salinas Municipal Code, and also the estimated peak parking demand for a furniture store (Land Use 890) per the 5th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation Manual (January 2019).

Table 1
Existing Use Parking Conditions
Existing Use Size/Area Parking Rate
Minimum
Parking
Spaces
Required
Existing
Parking
Spaces
Provided
Off-Street Parking Requirements per City of Salinas Municipal Code Furniture Store 20,146 sq. ft. Furniture Store: 1 per 600 sq. ft. 34 40 Estimated Existing Parking Demand per ITE Parking Generation Furniture Store
(ITE Land Use 890) 20,146 sq. ft. Weekday: 0.48 per 1,000 SF Saturday: 0.96 per 1,000 SF 191 40 Sources:

Table 37-50.100, Section 37-50.350, City of Salinas Municipal Code (Basic Requirements for Off-Street Parking and Loading.

ITE Parking Generation Manual (5th Edition, January 2019). 1 Based on peak Saturday parking demand rate per ITE Parking Generation Manual (5th Edition, January 2019)

PROPOSED PROJECT PARKING REQUIREMENT
Table 37-50.100 (Schedule A: Off-Street Parking and Loading Spaces Required) in Section 37-50.350 of the City of Salinas Municipal Code does not include a specific parking requirement rate for a cannabis dispensary use. Per Table 37-50.100, any retail sales uses that are not listed as a specific use classification are required to use the general retail sales parking rate of 1 space per 300 square-feet. In addition, because the existing 20,146 square-foot building would be shared by two different tenants/owners, the proposed uses would be defined as a shopping center, which has a parking rate of 1 space per 250 square-feet for floor areas over 15,000 square-feet.

Based on the 5,726 square-foot floor area of the proposed cannabis dispensary use and excluding the other proposed uses, a minimum of 20 parking spaces would be required per the City’s general retail sales parking rate. The proposed distribution use would be similar to a warehousing and storage use, which has a parking rate of 1 space per 1,000 square-feet per Table 37-50.100 in Section 37-50.350 of the City of Salinas Municipal Code. If the City’s warehousing and storage parking rate was applied to the 2,387 square-foot distribution area, an additional 3 parking spaces would be required. If the City’s furniture store parking rate of 1 space per 600 square-feet was applied to the proposed 9,373 square-foot furniture store use, an additional 16 parking spaces would be required, and a combined total of 39 parking spaces would be required for the project.

Mr. Grant Palmer
February 9, 2024

Page 3 of 11 ends

The City of Salinas zoning code does not allow for bifurcation of uses for parking requirements when the primary use is commercial retail, and also because the existing 20,146 square-foot building would be shared by two different tenants/owners, the City’s shopping center (floor areas over 15,000 square-feet) parking rate of 1 space per 250 square-feet would be required to be used for the entire 20,146 square-foot building.

If the City’s shopping center parking rate was applied to the 20,146 square-foot project floor area, a minimum of 81 parking spaces would be required. The project proposes to provide a total of 40 parking spaces; therefore, the project would have a shortage of 41 parking spaces if the City’s shopping center parking rate was used for the entire site.

Table 2 below summarizes the minimum parking spaces that would be required if using a combination of the City’s general retail, warehousing/storage, and furniture store parking rates versus using the City’s shopping center parking rate for the entire 20,146 square-foot building.

Table 2
City of Salinas Off-Street Parking Requirements
Proposed Use Size/Area No. of
Employees City’s Parking Rate
Minimum
Parking
Spaces
Required
Parking
Spaces
Provided
(Surplus/
Shortage)
Minimum Required Parking Based on General Retail/Warehousing/Furniture Store Parking Rates Cannabis Dispensary 5,726 sq. ft.

Total: 30
Onsite: 10
General Retail: 1 per 300 sq. ft. 20
40 Distribution 2,387 sq. ft. Warehousing/Storage: 1 per 1,000 sq. ft. 3 Employee Area 2,660 sq. ft. Ancillary Use 0
Furniture Store 9,373 sq. ft. Furniture Store: 1 per 600 sq. ft. 16 Total 39 40 (+1)
Minimum Required Parking Based on Shopping Center Parking Rate Only Cannabis Dispensary/
Furniture Store 20,146 sq. ft. Total: 30 Onsite: 10
Shopping Center (over 15,000 sq. ft.):
1 per 250 sq. ft. 81 40 (-41)
Source:

Table 37-50.100, Section 37-50.350, City of Salinas Municipal Code (Basic Requirements for Off-Street Parking and Loading Due to the lack of a specific parking rate for a cannabis dispensary use in the City’s Municipal Code, this parking demand study has been prepared to survey four existing cannabis dispensary sites with the purpose of calculating a peak parking demand rate that is specific to a cannabis dispensary use.

Mr. Grant Palmer
February 9, 2024

Page 4 of 11 ends

EXISTING PARKING OCCUPANCY SURVEYS
Parking occupancy surveys were conducted at four existing cannabis dispensaries in the greater SalinasSanta Cruz area on one weekday (Tuesday and Thursday) and on one weekend day (Saturday) to develop a specific parking demand rate for a cannabis dispensary in the local area. The existing cannabis dispensaries were selected based on the following criteria to ensure accuracy and comparability to the proposed site:
• Occupies a stand-alone building that is not shared with other businesses; and • Provides a parking lot that is exclusively used by the cannabis dispensary and is not shared with other uses.

The following existing cannabis dispensaries met the above-listed criteria, and parking occupancy surveys were conducted at these sites on Saturday, May 14, 2022, Tuesday, May 17, 2022, Saturday, June 25, 2022, and Thursday, June 30, 2022:
1) Santa Cruz Naturals, 9077 Soquel Drive, Aptos, CA
2) White Fire Prunedale, 2329 San Miguel Canyon Road, Prunedale, CA 3) One Plant, 10031 Reese Circle, Salinas, CA
4) East of Eden Cannabis Co., 8022 Moss Landing Road, Moss Landing, CA The number of parking spaces provided for each cannabis dispensary site was counted prior to conducting the parking occupancy surveys to determine the parking utilization rates by time of day for each survey site.

Below are the current hours of operation for each of the cannabis dispensary survey sites:

Santa Cruz Naturals
• Monday-Friday: 8:00 AM – 8:00 PM
• Saturday-Sunday: 10:00 AM - 8:00 PM
White Fire Prunedale
• Monday-Sunday: 8:00 AM – 8:00 PM
One Plant
• Monday-Sunday: 9:00 AM – 8:00 PM
East of Eden Cannabis Co.
• Monday-Sunday: 8:00 AM – 8:00 PM
The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation Manual (5th Edition, 2019) provides a time-of-day distribution of parking demand for a cannabis dispensary use, which shows a peak parking demand at 2:00 PM, and with at least 50% of the peak parking demand occurring between 10:00 AM and 7:00 PM.

Based on the published ITE time-of-day parking demand distribution for a cannabis dispensary and the hours of operation for the four selected cannabis dispensary survey sites, the parking occupancy surveys were recorded on an hourly basis beginning at 10:00 AM and ending at 8:00 PM.

Mr. Grant Palmer
February 9, 2024

Page 5 of 11 ends

Table 3 provides the results of the weekday parking occupancy survey, and the results of the weekend parking occupancy survey are provided in Table 4. The raw parking count data is provided in Attachment A following this letter.

Tables 3 and 4 show the following peak parking utilizations of the individual existing cannabis dispensaries:
• Santa Cruz Naturals: Weekday = 38% (5-6 PM); Weekend = 23% (4-6 PM) • White Fire Prunedale: Weekday = 17% (4-6 PM); Weekend = 28% (5-6 PM) • One Plant: Weekday = 61% (3-4 PM); Weekend = 61% (1-2 PM) • East of Eden Cannabis Co.: Weekday = 25% (10 AM-1 PM); Weekend = 50% (3-4 PM) Table 3 shows that the average peak parking utilization of the four cannabis dispensary sites occurs between 3:00 PM and 4:00 PM on a typical weekday, with an average peak parking utilization of 32%.

Table 4 shows that on a typical weekend, the average peak parking utilization of the four cannabis dispensary sites occurs between 3:00 PM and 5:00 PM, with an average peak parking utilization of 35%.

PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
The results of the parking occupancy surveys were used to develop weekday and weekend parking demand rates for a cannabis dispensary use, which will be used to determine the estimated peak parking demand and required parking spaces for the proposed CannaCruz Salinas cannabis dispensary store.

Individual peak parking demand rates were calculated for each of the four existing cannabis dispensaries based on the number of parking spaces per thousand square-feet of building area. The approximate building areas of the four cannabis dispensary locations are listed below:
• Santa Cruz Naturals: 1,674 square-feet
• White Fire Prunedale: 1,646 square-feet
• One Plant: 7,240 square-feet (includes distribution and storage space) • East of Eden Cannabis Co.: 3,048 square-feet
Weekday and weekend peak parking demand rates for the four above-listed cannabis dispensary locations were calculated by dividing the peak parking demand (highest occupied parking spaces) by the building area in thousands of square-feet, as shown in the following equation: A = B / (C / 1,000), where A is the peak parking demand rate, B is the peak parking demand highest occupied parking spaces), and C is the building area in square-feet, which is divided by 1,000 to convert building area to thousand square-feet.

The results of the weekday and weekend peak parking demand rate calculations are shown in Table 5 and Table 6, respectively.

As shown in Table 5, the average weekday peak parking demand rate was calculated at 1.75 parking spaces per thousand square-feet.

Table 6 shows that the average weekend peak parking demand rate was calculated at 1.92 parking spaces per thousand square-feet.

Mr. Grant Palmer
February 9, 2024 Page 6 of 11
Table 3
Existing Weekday Parking Occupancy Surveys
Time
Santa Cruz Naturals
9077 Soquel Drive
Aptos, CA
White Fire Prunedale
2329 San Miguel
Canyon Road
Prunedale, CA
One Plant
10031 Reese Circle
Salinas, CA
East of Eden Cannabis Co.
8022 Moss Landing Road
Moss Landing, CA

TOTAL SURVEY
SITES
Parking Supply Parking Supply Parking Supply Parking Supply Parking Supply 13 18 18 8 57
Occupied
Parking
Spaces
Percent
Utilization
Occupied
Parking
Spaces
Percent
Utilization
Occupied
Parking
Spaces
Percent
Utilization
Occupied
Parking
Spaces
Percent
Utilization
Total
Occupied
Spaces
Average
Percent
Utilization
10:00 - 11:00 AM 2 15% 1 6% 8 44% 2 25% 13 23%
11:00 AM - 12:00 PM 1 8% 2 11% 10 56% 2 25% 15 26%
12:00 - 1:00 PM 1 8% 2 11% 8 44% 2 25% 13 23%
1:00 - 2:00 PM 1 8% 1 6% 7 39% 1 13% 10 18% 2:00 - 3:00 PM 2 15% 0 0% 9 50% 1 13% 12 21% 3:00 - 4:00 PM 4 31% 2 11% 11 61% 1 13% 18 32%
4:00 - 5:00 PM 4 31% 3 17% 8 44% 0 0% 15 26% 5:00 - 6:00 PM 5 38% 3 17% 9 50% 0 0% 17 30% 6:00 - 7:00 PM 3 23% 1 6% 6 33% 1 13% 11 19% 7:00 - 8:00 PM 2 15% 1 6% 7 39% 0 0% 10 18% Note: Hour with the highest parking demand for each individual site is shaded in gray, and the hour with the highest overall parking demand is outlined in thick box and indicated in bold.

Mr. Grant Palmer
February 9, 2024 Page 7 of 11
Table 4
Existing Weekend Parking Occupancy Surveys
Time
Santa Cruz Naturals
9077 Soquel Drive
Aptos, CA
White Fire Prunedale
2329 San Miguel
Canyon Road
Prunedale, CA
One Plant
10031 Reese Circle
Salinas, CA
East of Eden Cannabis Co.
8022 Moss Landing Road
Moss Landing, CA

TOTAL SURVEY
SITES
Parking Supply Parking Supply Parking Supply Parking Supply Parking Supply 13 18 18 8 57
Occupied
Parking
Spaces
Percent
Utilization
Occupied
Parking
Spaces
Percent
Utilization
Occupied
Parking
Spaces
Percent
Utilization
Occupied
Parking
Spaces
Percent
Utilization
Total
Occupied
Spaces
Average
Percent
Utilization
10:00 - 11:00 AM 1 8% 2 11% 9 50% 0 0% 12 21%
11:00 AM - 12:00 PM 2 15% 1 6% 10 56% 2 25% 15 26%
12:00 - 1:00 PM 2 15% 1 6% 9 50% 1 13% 13 23%
1:00 - 2:00 PM 1 8% 1 6% 11 61% 1 13% 14 25% 2:00 - 3:00 PM 0 0% 2 11% 8 44% 2 25% 12 21% 3:00 - 4:00 PM 2 15% 4 22% 10 56% 4 50% 20 35% 4:00 - 5:00 PM 3 23% 4 22% 10 56% 3 38% 20 35% 5:00 - 6:00 PM 3 23% 5 28% 9 50% 1 13% 18 32% 6:00 - 7:00 PM 1 8% 3 17% 9 50% 1 13% 14 25% 7:00 - 8:00 PM 1 8% 2 11% 6 33% 3 38% 12 21% Note: Hour with the highest parking demand for each individual site is shaded in gray, and the hour with the highest overall parking demand is outlined in thick box and indicated in bold.

Mr. Grant Palmer
February 9, 2024

Page 8 of 11 ends

Table 5
Weekday Peak Parking Demand Rate Calculations
Time
Santa Cruz Naturals
9077 Soquel Drive
Aptos, CA
White Fire Prunedale
2329 San Miguel Canyon Road
Prunedale, CA
One Plant
10031 Reese Circle
Salinas, CA
East of Eden Cannabis Co.
8022 Moss Landing Road
Moss Landing, CA
Average
Weekday
Peak
Parking
Demand
Rate
(per KSF)
Parking Supply Parking Supply Parking Supply Parking Supply 13 18 18 8
Building Size (Sq. Ft.) Building Size (Sq. Ft.) Building Size (Sq. Ft.) Building Size (Sq. Ft.) 1,674 1,646 7,240 3,048
Occupied
Parking
Spaces
Percent
Utilization
Peak
Parking
Demand
Rate1
(per KSF)
Occupied
Parking
Spaces
Percent
Utilization
Peak
Parking
Demand
Rate1
(per KSF)
Occupied
Parking
Spaces
Percent
Utilization
Peak
Parking
Demand
Rate1
(per KSF)
Occupied
Parking
Spaces
Percent
Utilization
Peak
Parking
Demand
Rate1
(per KSF)
10:00 - 11:00 AM 2 15% 1 6% 8 44% 2 25%

1.75 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM 1 8% 2 11% 10 56% 2 25% 0.66
12:00 - 1:00 PM 1 8% 2 11% 8 44% 2 25%
1:00 - 2:00 PM 1 8% 1 6% 7 39% 1 13% 2:00 - 3:00 PM 2 15% 0 0% 9 50% 1 13% 3:00 - 4:00 PM 4 31% 2 11% 11 61% 1.52 1 13% 4:00 - 5:00 PM 4 31% 3 17% 1.82 8 44% 0 0% 5:00 - 6:00 PM 5 38% 2.99 3 17% 9 50% 0 0% 6:00 - 7:00 PM 3 23% 1 6% 6 33% 1 13% 7:00 - 8:00 PM 2 15% 1 6% 7 39% 0 0% Note: Peak parking demand rates for the individual cannabis dispensaries are shaded in gray and indicated in bold. KSF = Thousand Square-Feet 1 Each parking demand rate was calculated by dividing the peak parking demand (highest occupied parking spaces) by the building area in thousands of square-feet, as shown in the following equation: A = B / (C / 1,000), where A is the parking demand rate, B is peak parking demand highest occupied parking spaces), and C is the building area in square-feet, which is divided by1,000 to convert building area to thousand square-feet.

Mr. Grant Palmer
February 9, 2024

Page 9 of 11 ends

Table 6
Weekend Peak Parking Demand Rate Calculations
Time
Santa Cruz Naturals
9077 Soquel Drive
Aptos, CA
White Fire Prunedale
2329 San Miguel Canyon Road
Prunedale, CA
One Plant
10031 Reese Circle
Salinas, CA
East of Eden Cannabis Co.
8022 Moss Landing Road
Moss Landing, CA
Average
Saturday
Peak
Parking
Demand
Rate
(per KSF)
Parking Supply Parking Supply Parking Supply Parking Supply 13 18 18 8
Building Size (Sq. Ft.) Building Size (Sq. Ft.) Building Size (Sq. Ft.) Building Size (Sq. Ft.) 1,674 1,646 7,240 3,048
Occupied
Parking
Spaces
Percent
Utilization
Peak
Parking
Demand
Rate1
(per KSF)
Occupied
Parking
Spaces
Percent
Utilization
Peak
Parking
Demand
Rate1
(per KSF)
Occupied
Parking
Spaces
Percent
Utilization
Peak
Parking
Demand
Rate1
(per KSF)
Occupied
Parking
Spaces
Percent
Utilization
Peak
Parking
Demand
Rate1
(per KSF)
10:00 - 11:00 AM 1 8% 2 11% 9 50% 0 0%

1.92 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM 2 15% 1 6% 10 56% 2 25%
12:00 - 1:00 PM 2 15% 1 6% 9 50% 1 13%
1:00 - 2:00 PM 1 8% 1 6% 11 61% 1.52 1 13% 2:00 - 3:00 PM 0 0% 2 11% 8 44% 2 25% 3:00 - 4:00 PM 2 15% 4 22% 10 56% 4 50% 1.31 4:00 - 5:00 PM 3 23% 1.79 4 22% 10 56% 3 38% 5:00 - 6:00 PM 3 23% 5 28% 3.04 9 50% 1 13% 6:00 - 7:00 PM 1 8% 3 17% 9 50% 1 13% 7:00 - 8:00 PM 1 8% 2 11% 6 33% 3 38% Note: Peak parking demand rates for the individual cannabis dispensaries are shaded in gray and indicated in bold. KSF = Thousand Square-Feet 1 Each parking demand rate was calculated by dividing the peak parking demand (highest occupied parking spaces) by the building area in thousands of square-feet, as shown in the following equation: A = B / (C / 1,000), where A is the parking demand rate, B is peak parking demand highest occupied parking spaces), and C is the building area in square-feet, which is divided by 1,000 to convert building area to thousand square-feet.

Mr. Grant Palmer
February 9, 2024

Page 10 of 11 ends

Based on the calculated peak parking demand rates shown in Tables 5 and 6, weighted average peak parking demand rates for an entire week (7 days) were calculated for the individual survey sites, from which an overall weighted average parking rate for an entire week was calculated. The weighted average calculations were made by applying the weekday peak parking demand rates over a 4-day period from Monday through Thursday, and by applying the weekend peak parking demand rates over a 3-day period from Friday through Sunday.

The following equation shows how the weighted average peak demand parking rates were calculated: A = ((B x 4) + (C x 3)) / 7, where A is the weighted average peak parking demand rate, B is the weekday peak parking rate, and C is the weekend peak parking demand rate. The overall average peak parking demand rate was calculated by dividing the sum of the individual average peak parking demand rates of the survey sites by the number of survey sites (4).

Table 7 shows the results of the weighted average peak parking demand rates for the individual survey sites and the overall weighted average peak parking demand rate.

Table 7
Weighted Average Peak Parking Demand Rate Calculations
Survey Site
Weekday
Peak Parking
Demand
Rate
(per KSF)
Weekend
Peak Parking
Demand Rate
(per KSF)
Weighted
Average
Peak Parking
Demand Rate
(per KSF)
Santa Cruz Naturals
9077 Soquel Drive, Aptos, CA 2.99 1.79 2.47
White Fire Prunedale
2329 San Miguel Canyon Road
Prunedale, CA

1.82 3.04 2.34
One Plant
10031 Reese Circle, Salinas, CA 1.52 1.52 1.52
East of Eden Cannabis Co.
8022 Moss Landing Road
Moss Landing, CA

0.66 1.31 0.94
Overall Weighted Average Peak Parking Demand Rate (per KSF) 1.82 1The weighted average calculations were made by applying the weekday peak parking demand rates over a 4-day period from Monday through Thursday, and by applying the weekend peak parking demand rates over a 3-day period from Friday through Sunday.

As shown in Table 7, an overall average peak parking demand rate of 1.82 parking spaces per thousand square-feet was calculated for a cannabis dispensary use. To compare with the City’s parking rates that are typically based on 1 parking space per floor area size, the calculated cannabis dispensary peak parking demand of 1.82 parking spaces per thousand square-feet would be approximately 1 parking space per 550 square-feet.

Based on the overall weighted average peak parking demand rate shown in Table 7, the estimated peak parking demand for the proposed CannaCruz Salinas cannabis dispensary and proposed furniture store is shown below in Table 8. Because the calculated peak parking demand rate for a cannabis dispensary (1 parking space per 550 square-feet) would be higher than that of a furniture store (1 parking space per 600 square-feet), the cannabis dispensary parking rate was applied to the entire 20,146 square-foot building.

Mr. Grant Palmer
February 9, 2024

Page 11 of 11 ends

Table 8
Estimated Peak Parking Demand of Proposed Project
Land Use Size Unit Peak Parking
Demand Rate
Peak
Parking
Demand
(No. of Spaces)
Existing
On-Site
Parking
Spaces
Parking
Surplus
Cannabis Dispensary/
Furniture Store 20.146 KSF 1 per 550 SF (1.82 per KSF) 37 40 3 KSF = Thousand Square-Feet
1 Based on weighted weekday/weekend average peak parking demand rate that was derived from the parking occupancy counts that were collected at four existing cannabis dispensary facilities.

As shown in Table 8, the proposed CannaCruz Salinas cannabis dispensary is estimated to generate a peak parking demand for 37 parking spaces. The project site currently provides 40 parking spaces.

CONCLUSIONS
This parking demand study was prepared to evaluate the parking requirement of the CannaCruz Salinas cannabis dispensary store, which proposes to relocate from its current site at 1156 Abbott Street in Salinas to a site located at 1228 South Main Street in Salinas.

Since the City of Salinas Municipal Code does not include any published parking rate for a cannabis dispensary use, parking occupancy surveys were conducted at four cannabis dispensary sample sites in the greater Salinas/Santa Cruz area. Parking demand rates were calculated based on the peak parking demand and building square-footage of each cannabis dispensary. The weighted average weekday/weekend peak parking demand rates were calculated for each surveyed cannabis dispensary, and an overall weighted average peak parking demand rate was calculated and applied to the proposed CannaCruz Salinas site.

Utilizing these site-specific parking rates, the CannaCruz Salinas cannabis dispensary and proposed furniture store was estimated to generate a peak parking demand for 37 parking spaces, resulting in a surplus of 3 parking spaces. Therefore, the results of this parking demand study show that the existing 40 on-site parking spaces are anticipated to provide sufficient parking for the proposed project.

It must be noted that this parking demand analysis is conservative by using the project’s entire building square-footage (20,146 square-feet) to calculate the peak parking demand rather than only the retail sales areas of the combined cannabis dispensary and furniture store (15,099 square-feet). Most existing cannabis dispensaries have floor areas under 10,000 square-feet, with the four survey cannabis dispensaries providing examples of typical floor area sizes for this type of use.

If you have any questions regarding the results of this analysis, please contact me directly at (619) 291- 0707.

Sincerely,

RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY

David Mizell, AICP Mark Jugar, P.E., T.E., P.T.O.E.

Associate Traffic Planner Associate
L:\Files\19633\text\19633.003.CannaCruzSalinasPkgStudy_REVISED_2024-0209.docx Attachments
(E.) ROLL-UP DOOR

DISTRIBUTOR

PRODUCT STORAGE
630 ft²

ORDER FULFILLMENT
1067 ft²

SECURED

CASHIER AREA
504 ft²
MERCH. SALES AREA
1360 ft²

ENTRY / LOBBY
565 ft²

RETAIL AREA
2200 ft²

BREAK ROOM
200 ft²
OFFICE
192 ft²
RETAIL

STORAGE
62 ft²

SAFE ROOM
SERVER ROOM 89 ft²
68 ft²

DISTRIBUTOR

PRODUCT INTAKE / SAMPLING (BY TEST LAB)
/ BATCH STORAGE
407 ft²

SECURITY OFFICE
152 ft²
POS

ONE-WAY GLASS

ONE-WAY GLASS

XPRESS XPRESS XPRESS XPRESS

ARTWORK
POS

FALSE WALL - WINDOW DISPLAYS

RECEPTION DESK
MERCH.

POS
(E.) RAMP
UP

STAFF LOCKERS
(TO BE DETERMINED BY SITE VISIT)
UP

CASHIER CASHIER CASHIER

CASHIER

CASHIER
(E.) RAMP
UP

PASSAGEWAY
206 ft²

ARTWORK / PHOTO MOMENT ARTWORK / PHOTO MOMENT

VENDOR POP-UP STATION
416 ft²
(E.) STAIRS UP

MEDIA AREA
619 ft²

ONE-WAY GLASS
COUNTER + WALL SHELVES

PRODUCT DISPLAY CASES

PRODUCT DISPLAY CASESPRODUCT DISPLAY CASES

NO PARKING

DISTRIBUTOR

SECURE VEHICLE LOADING AREA

WASTE STORAGE
283 ft²

STORAGE
67 ft²
(E.) W/C
80 ft²
(E.) W/C
80 ft²
ENTRY
ENTRY
S. MAIN STREET

NEW BIKE RACKS

NEW BIKE RACKS
21'-6 1/16" 34'-5" 10'-5 1/8" 13'-8" 9'-11" 9'-5 7/16" 16'-5 5/8" 7'-5" 7'-5" 64'-6 1/8" 201'-10"
6'-9" 14'-0"
6'-6" 5'-9" 15'-9" 10'-5"5'-5"
29'-2" 14'-5" 14'-6" 29'-4"
47'-4 1/2" 35'-6" 35'-0"
30'-8"
81'-6 3/16"
40'-10 1/8" 19'-1" 19'-0" 19'-5" 19'-0" 28'-4" 18'-2" 19'-7" 14'-9" 29'-10" 120'-2" 90'-2"
SHEET NO.

DATESCALE
NO. DATE REVISION / ISSUE

SHEET SIZE
11x17
1 2
SALINAS, CA.

PROFESSIONAL SEAL

DRAWN BY

PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN
COMMENTS:

R.F.

AS NOTED
1 A02

PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN
SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"
1228 MAIN STREET, SALINAS CA. 93901
APN: 016-161-052
2-7-24

CANNABIS RETAIL DISPENSARY

PROPOSED TENANT IMPROVEMENT
NOTE:Distribution – pre-test batches, sampling, post-test batches, packaging, labeling, records storage, surveillance system storage, loading/unloading/inventory intake, order fulfillmentFulfillment – receipt of retail orders and fulfillment of retail orders from distribution product storage (wholesale to retail) TOTAL RETAIL = 5,726 SQ. FT. TOTAL RETAIL FULFILLMENT = 2,387 SQ. FT TOTAL EMPLOYEE/OFFICE = 1,134 SQ. FT.

COMMON AREA = 1,526 SF SQ. FT.

UNIT B

PROPOSED CHANGE OF USE TO

CANNABIS RETAIL &

ANCILLARY DISTRIBUTION
9,247 ft² UNIT A

NO CHANGE IN USE PROPOSED

EXISTING FURNITURE RETAIL
9,373 ft²

ATTACHMENT A

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Rick Engineering Company
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 5620 Friars Rd
www.metrotrafficdata.com San Diego, CA 92110

SITE LATITUDE

ADDRESS LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Space # Note 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 1 Street0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0
2 Street0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
3 East ADA0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 East0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 East1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0
6 East0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 East1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1
8 East0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
9 North0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
10 North0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 North0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12 North0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
13 North0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SPACES 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM TOTALS: 13 2111244532
% Occupied: 15% 8% 8% 8% 15% 31% 31% 38% 23% 15%
Tuesday, May 17, 2022 Clear
Parking Occupancy
Santa Cruz Naturals 36.9757
9077 Soquel Dr, Aptos, CA 95003 -121.8881
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Rick Engineering Company
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 5620 Friars Rd
www.metrotrafficdata.com San Diego, CA 92110

SITE LATITUDE

ADDRESS LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Space # Note 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 1 Street0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0
2 Street0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
3 East ADA0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 East0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 East1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0
6 East0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 East1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1
8 East0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
9 North0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
10 North0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 North0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12 North0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
13 North0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SPACES 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM TOTALS: 13 2111244532
% Occupied: 15% 8% 8% 8% 15% 31% 31% 38% 23% 15%
Saturday, May 14, 2022 Clear
Parking Occupancy
Santa Cruz Naturals 36.9757
9077 Soquel Dr, Aptos, CA 95003 -121.8881
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Rick Engineering Company
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 5620 Friars Rd
www.metrotrafficdata.com San Diego, CA 92110

SITE LATITUDE

ADDRESS LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Space # Note 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 1 North0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
2 North0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 North0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
4 North0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 North0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
6 North0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 North0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 North0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 North0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10 North0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 North0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12 East0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
13 East0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
14 East0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
15 East0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16 East0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
17 East0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
18 Rear ADA1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1
SPACES 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM TOTALS: 18 1221023311
% Occupied: 6% 11% 11% 6% 0% 11% 17% 17% 6% 6%
Tuesday, May 17, 2022 Clear
Parking Occupancy
White Fire Prunedale 36.8033
2329 San Miguel Canyon Rd, Prunedale, CA 93907 -121.6669 Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Rick Engineering Company
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 5620 Friars Rd
www.metrotrafficdata.com San Diego, CA 92110

SITE LATITUDE

ADDRESS LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Space # Note 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 1 North0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
2 North0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 North0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
4 North0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 North0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
6 North0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 North0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 North0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 North0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10 North0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 North0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12 East0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
13 East0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
14 East0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
15 East0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16 East0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
17 East0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
18 Rear ADA1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1
SPACES 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM TOTALS: 18 1221023311
% Occupied: 6% 11% 11% 6% 0% 11% 17% 17% 6% 6%
Saturday, May 14, 2022 Clear
Parking Occupancy
White Fire Prunedale 36.8033
2329 San Miguel Canyon Rd, Prunedale, CA 93907 -121.6669 Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Rick Engineering Company
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 5620 Friars Rd
www.metrotrafficdata.com San Diego, CA 92110

SITE LATITUDE

ADDRESS LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Space # Note 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 1 Front ADA 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Front 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1
3 Front 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0
4 Front 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
5 Front 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
6 Front ADA 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 Front 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 Front 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 Front 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
10 Front 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 Front 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
12 Rear 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
13 Rear 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
14 Rear 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
15 Rear 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16 Rear 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
17 Rear 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
18 Rear 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
SIDE - 1212222210
SPACES 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM TOTALS: 18 9 10 9 11 8 10 10 9 9 6
% Occupied: 50% 56% 50% 61% 44% 56% 56% 50% 50% 33%
Saturday, June 25, 2022 Clear
Parking Occupancy
One Plant (Salinas/Prunedale) 36.772204°
10031 Reese Cir, Salinas, CA 93907 -121.667995°
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Rick Engineering Company
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 5620 Friars Rd
www.metrotrafficdata.com San Diego, CA 92110

SITE LATITUDE

ADDRESS LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Space # Note 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 1 Front ADA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Front 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1
3 Front 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 Front 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1
5 Front 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1
6 Front ADA 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0
7 Front 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 Front 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0
9 Front 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
10 Front 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
11 Front 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
12 Rear 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
13 Rear 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0
14 Rear 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
15 Rear 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16 Rear 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
17 Rear 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
18 Rear 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
SIDE - 2222211100
SPACES 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM TOTALS: 18 8 10 8 7 9 11 8 9 6 7
% Occupied: 44% 56% 44% 39% 50% 61% 44% 50% 33% 39%
Thursday, June 30, 2022 Clear
Parking Occupancy
One Plant (Salinas/Prunedale) 36.772204°
10031 Reese Cir, Salinas, CA 93907 -121.667995°
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Rick Engineering Company
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 5620 Friars Rd
www.metrotrafficdata.com San Diego, CA 92110

SITE LATITUDE

ADDRESS LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Space # Note 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 1 Street 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0
2 South 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 South 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 South 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 South 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 South 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 South 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
8 South ADA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SPACES 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM TOTALS: 8 2221110010
% Occupied: 25% 25% 25% 13% 13% 13% 0% 0% 13% 0%
Tuesday, May 17, 2022 Clear
Parking Occupancy
East of Eden Cannabis Co 36.7982
8022 Moss Landing Rd, Moss Landing, CA 95039 -121.7864
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Rick Engineering Company
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 5620 Friars Rd
www.metrotrafficdata.com San Diego, CA 92110

SITE LATITUDE

ADDRESS LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Space # Note 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 1 Street 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
2 South 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 South 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0
4 South 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1
5 South 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 South 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
7 South 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
8 South ADA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SPACES 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM TOTALS: 8 0211243113
% Occupied: 0% 25% 13% 13% 25% 50% 38% 13% 13% 38%
Saturday, May 14, 2022 Clear
Parking Occupancy
East of Eden Cannabis Co 36.7982
8022 Moss Landing Rd, Moss Landing, CA 95039 -121.7864
December 15, 2021
Grant Palmer
115 Limekiln Street
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
RE: ZONING INFORMATION FOR A COMMERCIAL CANNABIS
BUSINESS (CCB) LOCATED AT 1228 SOUTH MAIN STREET IN THE CR-FG-3 (COMMERCIAL RETAIL – SOUTH MAIN STREET FOCUSED
GROWTH OVERLAY 3) ZONING DISTRICT (APN: 016-161-052-000) (ZLTR 2021-011)
Dear Mr. Palmer:

On December 8, 2021 the Community Development Department received your request for zoning information for the above referenced site in connection with a Commercial Cannabis Business (CCB) consisting of:
1) Dispensary
The subject site is located in the CR-FG-3 (Commercial Retail – South Main Street Focused Growth Overlay 3) Zoning District (APN 016-161-052-000). The following provides an overview of the adjacent land uses and zoning districts to the site:

North: Residential/Commercial Retail – South Main Street Focused Growth Overlay 3 (CR-FG-3)
South: Restaurant/Commercial Retail – South Main Street Focused Growth Overlay 3 (CR-FG-3)
East: Shopping Center/Commercial Retail – South Main Street Focused Growth Overlay 3 (CR-FG-3)
West: Medical Office/Commercial Retail – South Main Street Focused Growth Overlay 3 (CR-FG-3)
Project case files applicable to the site are listed below. Copies are available in our office for review.

1. SP 2011-015 – Sign Permit 2011-015
Zoning Analysis of the proposed CCB.

1. Dispensary: Dispensary, which is most closely defined as Retail Sales per Zoning Code Section 37-10.420, is permissible in the underlying CR-FG-3 Zoning District through the Site Plan Review process per Zoning Code Section 37-30.200, Table 37-30.90.

Analysis of Sensitive Uses.

The CCB must not be within a 1,000-foot radius of schools, churches, libraries, colleges, smoke shops, hookah lounges or other sensitive uses as in described in S.M.C Section 16B-30.70, unless otherwise allowed per the Municipal Code. Per available records, City staff has determined that the proposed CCB is located within a 1,000-foot radius of several sensitive uses (measured from parcel to parcel), as follows:

1. 1152 S Main Street: retail sales – smoke and vape shop – Clout Nine Cigar and Vapor, 600 feet away

2. 72 E San Joaquin Street: religious assembly – Saint Ansgars Lutheran Church, 845 feet away

3. 1250 S Main Street: restaurant with liquor sales – Elli’s – 20 feet away

4. 1275 S Main Street: food and beverage sales with liquor sold – Star Market – 438 feet away

5. 1320 S Main Street: food and beverage sales with liquor sold – Nob Hill Foods – 600 feet away

6. 1150 S Main Street: food and beverage sales with liquor sold – Lucky – 640 feet away
Note the issuance of a “Zoning Information Letter” does not mean the written evidence of permission given by the City of Salinas or any of its officials to operate a CCB nor does it not mean “permit” within the meaning of the Permit Streamlining Act, nor does it constitute an entitlement under the Zoning or Building Codes, and a regulatory permit for the purpose of regulating a CCB does not constitute a permit that runs with the land on which the CCB is established.

Zoning information may be accessed via the Internet at the following link (look for Chapter 37 Zoning at the bottom left side column):
http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientId=16597&stateId=5&stateName=Californ ia
Information regarding Building Permits, Code Enforcement, and Certificates of Occupancy may be obtained from Permit and Inspection Services, located at 65 West Alisal Street, Salinas, CA 93901 (phone 831-758-7251).

Should you need additional information from the Community Development Department, please contact me at 831-758-7206.

Sincerely,
Adam Garrett
Assistant Planner
Enclosures: Map of Parcels Within 1,000 Feet of 1228 S Main Street Portion of Sensitive Use Map for Subject Site
Property Report for 1228 S Main Street
I:\ComDev\Planning Share Space\Zoning Letters\2021\ZLTR 2021-018 - (1228 S Main St)\ZLTR 2021-011.doc Map of subject property with a 1000-foot buffer
Map of sensitive uses in area surrounding the subject property Subject Property

1 DATE: January 26, 2016
FROM: Christopher A. Callihan, City Attorney
SUBJECT: AN ORDINANCE RELATED TO THE ESTABLISHMENT AND THE REGULATION OF COMMERCIAL CANNABIS BUSINESSES—ADOPTION

RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council consider adopting an ordinance allowing for the establishment of commercial cannabis businesses in Salinas and regulations on the location and the operation of commercial cannabis businesses.

It is further recommended that the City Council provide direction to the City Attorney and the City Clerk as to the preparation of a business tax to be submitted to Salinas voters for their approval at the June 2016 statewide presidential primary election.

DISCUSSION:

On January 6, 2016, Council member Lutes introduced an ordinance (as presented) allowing for the establishment and the operation of a limited number of commercial cannabis businesses. Having been introduced, the City Council is now asked to consider adopting the ordinance which, if adopted, would become effective in thirty (30) days.

The City Council’s introduction of the ordinance represents a significant policy change for the City established in 2007 when the City Council adopted an ordinance prohibiting medical marijuana dispensaries. With the State’s recent adoption of the Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act, cities across the state are having to address the question whether to allow medical marijuana businesses to open in their jurisdictions or to prohibit them. Like Salinas, those other cities are also looking to balance the needs of their residents who need/use marijuana as medication against those of their residents who do not and who do not want medical marijuana businesses to open in their communities.

During the City Council’s January 6, 2016 public hearing on the ordinance, Council members Barrera and McShane asked questions concerning the hours and days of operation during which dispensaries may operate. The hours and days, as considered and recommended by the Planning Commission, and set in the ordinance are Monday through Saturday 8:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M., including holidays.

Council member Barrera questioned whether the hours and days of operation for dispensaries provided sufficient access to patients in need of medication. Council member McShane asked how the hours and days of operation for dispensaries compared to other cities. Provided here is a

REPORT TO THE

CITY COUNCIL
City of Salinas, California
2 comparison of the hours and days of Salinas’s ordinance against the hours and days of three local cities:

City Permitted Days Permitted Hours
Salinas Monday – Saturday 8:00 A.M. – 7:00 P.M. (proposed) Del Rey Oaks Monday – Sunday 10:00 A.M. – 8:00 P.M.

Santa Cruz Monday – Sunday 10:00 A.M. – 9:00 P.M.
10:00 A.M. – 7:00 P.M.
8:30 A.M. – 7:00 P.M.

San Jose Monday – Sunday 9:00 A.M. – 9:00 P.M.

During the City Council Subcommittee’s discussions on medical marijuana and the establishment of commercial cannabis businesses in Salinas, they provided direction that a business tax be presented to the voters at a rate of 12% - 15% of the businesses’ gross receipts. To provide flexibility in setting the rate, the City Attorney has recommended that if the business tax rate ceiling is going to be 15% that the ordinance establishing the business tax set the rate as being “up to 15%”, with the rate subject to change (not exceeding that ceiling) by the City Council. Provided here is a comparison of the business tax rates of the three same local cities mentioned above:

City Tax Rate
Del Rey Oaks None
Santa Cruz 7% with an option to increase to
10%
San Jose 10% (initial rate was 7%)
As a point of reference for the City Council as it makes its determination of a business tax rate, City staff are not aware of any city in California with a rate above 10%. This should be taken into consideration as imposing too high a tax rate may have the unintended negative effect of forcing commercial cannabis businesses “underground” and over-burdening them such that they cannot maintain fiscal solvency. If the City Council provides direction to the City Attorney and the City Clerk to prepare a business tax to be submitted to the voters, the ballot materials will be brought forward to the City Council in late February or early March and will include alternative programs for the City Council’s consideration.

As the City Council begins to contemplate the presentation of a commercial cannabis business tax to the voters, the City Council should begin to consider the initial tax rate to be imposed and the possible negative effects of too high a tax rate. The imposition of too high a tax may prevent these businesses may cause these businesses to remain “in the shadows”. City staff will prepare different models of taxation and will present those to the City Council’s Finance Subcommittee for consideration and a recommendation before consideration by the full City Council.

Adoption of the ordinance has certain benefits including providing Salinas residents more ready access to marijuana medications without having to drive to neighboring cities and bringing medical marijuana businesses “out of the shadows”, making them more mainstream, and incorporating them into the fabric of the community. Knowing where these businesses are located and how they are operating arguably provides the City with greater opportunity to address the negative attendant effects of these businesses. Additionally, having these businesses more mainstream and having them 3 incorporate research and innovation into their business models (as recommended by the Planning Commission) mat likely result in a higher quality, safer product for Salinas’s residents who choose to use marijuana as medication; allowing Salinas’s residents more ready access to the medication of their choice and allowing innovative businesses to open and to establish operations in Salinas may result in a higher quality products being available to the patients, which may not be available “on the street” or in the black market.

After the City Council introduced the ordinance, the Monterey County Health Department provided comments on the City’s ordinance and suggest that the City include provisions for food safety, storage of hazardous materials, and solid waste disposal. Those edits are incorporated into the attached ordinance and are shown in underlined type-face. As the City’s health officer, the Health Department would enforce compliance with those provisions of the City’s ordinance.

ISSUE
Shall the City Council adopt an ordinance related to the establishment of regulations on commercial cannabis businesses?
Shall the City Council provide direction to the City Attorney and the City Clerk as to the preparation of a business tax to be submitted to Salinas voters for their approval at the June 2016 statewide presidential primary election?

CEQA CONSIDERATIONS
The environmental impacts of the project have been analyzed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The proposed ordinance is exempt from further environmental analysis per CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment.

FISCAL IMPACTS
There are no direct, immediate fiscal impacts to the City with the City Council’s introduction and adoption of the ordinance; however, there will be an impact on City resources associated with the review of applications, processing of permits and other approvals, inspections and background checks, and other support City Staff will provide to this program. Additional funding is needed to provide and to support the resources necessary to support the program and should be provided through fees charged to the businesses. Fee resolutions will be prepared and will later be presented to the City Council. In addition, if also directed by the City Council, a tax measure imposing a on commercial cannabis businesses will be prepared and will be presented to the voters for their consideration and approval. Without sufficient resources to manage this program, the City and the community may realize negative impacts. The City Council is encouraged to consider having the fees in place and the tax measure approved before any permits are issued to commercial cannabis businesses.

TIME CONSIDERATIONS
Unless AB 21 is passed by the State Legislature, there is some ambiguity as to the effectiveness of the March 1, 2016 deadline established in the Medical Marijuana Regulations and Safety Act. As of the 4 preparation of this Report, AB 21 was passed by the Senate Health Committee without opposition, but had not yet been considered by the full Legislature. The City currently has moratoria in place on new, additional manufacturing facilities and cultivation facilities, as well as a prohibition on dispensaries (since 2007). The City Council could choose to leave the existing prohibitions in place and consider an ordinance at a later date or consider the ordinance now for introduction and adoption.

COUNCIL GOALS
Adoption of the ordinance does not directly advance any of the City Council’s goals or initiatives; however, to the extent commercial cannabis businesses are allowed to establish and operate the ordinance includes requirements and operating restrictions designed to mitigate negative impacts on the city and on the community.

ALTERNATIVES AVAILABLE TO COUNCIL
The City Council could choose to not introduce the proposed ordinance or to provide direction regarding the preparation of a tax measure.

CONCLUSION
The City’s consideration of an ordinance to permit the establishment of commercial cannabis businesses and the implementation of regulations upon those businesses is a significant change in policy. The City Council’s Subcommittee directed that an ordinance be prepared to allow for the establishment of a limited number of commercial cannabis businesses and to provide for the regulation of such businesses. The Planning Commission considered a draft proposed ordinance and recommended a final draft ordinance be presented to the City Council with provisions consistent with what the Subcommittee recommended, in addition to other specific considerations. The City Council considered the draft ordinance recommended by the Planning Commission and introduced the same on January 6, 2016. A final draft ordinance (incorporating recent suggested edits by the Monterey County Health Department) is now ready for the City Council’s adoption, with the ordinance effective thirty days thereafter. Following adoption, City staff will prepare application materials, selection criteria, and will prepare a business tax measure for the City Council consideration for presentation to the voters.

DISTRIBUTION BACK UP PAGES
City Manager Ordinance
City Attorney
Department Heads

Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: AUGUST 15, 2017
DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE
CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
FROM: ANDREW MYRICK, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MANAGER
CHRISTOPHER A. CALLIHAN, CITY ATTORNEY
TITLE: GOVERNANCE OF COMMERCIAL CANNABIS BUSINESSES
RECOMMENDED MOTION:

Staff Recommends that the City Council take the following actions:
1) Adopt the proposed Ordinance amending Chapter 16B of the Salinas Municipal Code; 2) Approve the proposed Resolution related to application procedures for the issuance of additional commercial cannabis permits; and
3) Approve the proposed Resolution to implement the provisions of Chapter 19A, relating to taxes on commercial cannabis businesses.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the Council adopt the attached Ordinance and approve the attached Resolutions, which will enable staff to begin the implementation of further activities associated with regulating the medicinal commercial cannabis industry.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Based on Council feedback at the Council Meeting of July 11, 2017, City staff has prepared the materials necessary to allow the City to be able to review permit applications in a manner that will reduce the time required while maintaining standards, implement procedures to monitor and provide reporting to the Council and the community regarding the commercial cannabis industry, and implement the City’s taxation protocols in accordance with Measure L.

BACKGROUND:

History of Cannabis Regulations
For many years, the cannabis plant (also known as marijuana and/or hemp) has been (and remains) a controlled substance under the Federal Controlled Substances Act. However, in recent decades debate has arisen regarding the potentially beneficial impacts of using cannabis to treat certain medical conditions. As of the date of this Report, 29 states and the District of Colombia have Page | 2
passed laws providing for the use of cannabis for medical purposes, and an additional 16 states have passed laws allowing for the use of certain extracts from the cannabis plant to be used medicinally in certain situations.

Furthermore, debate has also arisen regarding the question of whether cannabis should be allowed to be used for recreational purposes. The argument in favor of legality is based on the theory that cannabis, like tobacco/nicotine and alcohol, can be consumed responsibly by adults if properly regulated. As of this date, seven states, including California, and the District of Colombia have legalized cannabis for recreational use.

Although California has been gradually permitting the possession and use of medicinal cannabis since 1996, in 2015 the California legislature significantly changed the industry by passing the Medical Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (MCRSA), which created a licensing structure to allow for the legal cultivation, manufacture, and sales of medicinal cannabis and medicinal cannabis product. In response to this bill, the City Council in January 2016 adopted Chapter 16B of the Municipal Code regulating commercial cannabis businesses. Chapter 16B stipulated a limited number of four types of businesses, and provided regulations for these businesses.

Additionally, Chapter 16B explicitly excluded recreational cannabis.

Two significant changes impacting the commercial cannabis industry in Salinas were approved by voters during the November 2016 election. The first of these was Measure L, a tax on commercial cannabis businesses placed on the ballot by the City Council that passed with nearly 75% of the vote. This resulted in the addition of Chapter 19A to the Municipal Code, which provides tax rates for commercial cannabis businesses and specifies the methods of collection for these taxes.

The second significant change that occurred in the November 2016 election was the passage of Proposition 64 (aka the Adult Use of Marijuana Act, or AUMA), which provided a framework for the legalization of recreational cannabis in California, effective January 1, 2018. As a result of this, the California legislature repealed MCRSA and incorporated its provisions, with some modifications, into AUMA, creating the Medicinal and Adult-Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (MAUCRSA). The MAUCRSA was signed into law by Governor Brown on June 27, 2017, and became effective immediately. Several bills that would make additional changes to these regulations are under review in the legislature. State regulations are currently under development.

Background of Current Ordinance and Resolutions
Pursuant to Chapter 16B and the MCRSA, the City of Salinas developed regulations relating to the acceptance and processing of permits for commercial cannabis businesses (which were approved by the City Council on May 17, 2016), and began accepting applications for medical commercial cannabis businesses in June 2016. The process for reviewing these applications ran from July 2016 through May 2017, and was conducted by a Selection Committee. This Committee originally consisted of four City employees with guidance and leadership provided by HdL Consultants; however, upon the retirement of one of the Committee members, Hdl assumed the additional role of serving on the Committee. The process originally consisted of a three-phase application review, with each phase scored or reviewed separately. Business interviews were conducted in January 2017, and the selected businesses were announced in May 2017.

Page | 3
During a meeting of the Council Finance Subcommittee on June 5, 2017, the members of the Subcommittee (Councilmembers Barrera, Davis, and Mayor Gunter) expressed concern regarding the permitting process (specifically regarding the length of time spent reviewing the applications) and with the limitations to the number of businesses provided in the Ordinance. The Subcommittee requested that staff bring a revised Ordinance to the July 11, 2017, City Council meeting in order to increase the number of permits available to Cultivation, Dispensary, and Manufacturing businesses from three to five per category, and creating a path forward for testing laboratories.

Upon receiving this feedback, staff conducted a thorough review of Chapter 16B with the Subcommittee’s concerns in mind. While not all of the challenges associated with the permitting process were tied to the Ordinance, staff identified a number of changes, both major and minor, that could be modified to streamline application processing. In addition, staff identified additional business types (in addition to Cultivation, Manufacturing, Dispensaries, and Delivery) that had been effectively prohibited through the lack of a process for approval; procedures for approval for Testing Facilities and Distribution were added to the Ordinance.

On June 27, 2017, the MAUCRSA was signed into law, immediately changing the State’s regulatory structure in significant ways. Staff promptly conducted a review of the MAUCRSA and made modifications to the proposed Ordinance – however, due to the July 4th holiday, staff was unable to conduct a comprehensive review prior to the hearing on July 11. Due to the upcoming Council break, staff made the decision to introduce the Ordinance on schedule, and to take the five-week break following the hearing as an opportunity for a more comprehensive examination.

At the City Council meeting of July 11, 2017, the Council requested clarification on a number of items, both regarding the proposed ordinance and relating to the implementation of Chapter 16B, regarding both the need expressed by Council to provide excellent customer service as well as to understand the impacts of that operation on City resources. The Ordinance, Resolutions, and additional information that are brought before the Council in this Report are intended to address many of these concerns.

ANALYSIS:

Ordinance
As discussed at the July 11 Council Meeting, the Ordinance presented makes a number of modifications to the permitting regime. The most significant modifications are:
1) Increase the number of permissible locations for Cultivation, Manufacturing, and Dispensaries from 3 to 5, and establishing a maximum of 5 Distribution permits; 2) Addition of an Administrative Permit for testing laboratories and Distribution locations under 500 square feet in size;
3) Allowed additional staff flexibility to review and approve applications located near certain sensitive receptors, particularly alcohol-related uses; and Page | 4
4) Streamlined the application process by designating a Selection Committee to review Permits and moving some administrative functions to the City Manager’s Office.

Since the Ordinance was introduced on July 11, staff has been able to more comprehensively review SB 94. A number of inconsistencies were identified between the City’s existing law, which was developed under MCSRA, and the provisions of MAUCRSA. Changes have been made between the Ordinance provided on July 11 and the one before Council today for the purposes of making our Ordinance consistent with MAUCRSA. The City Attorney has opined that, because these changes are not significant and/or are designed to bring the Ordinance in compliance with another law, it is not necessary to reintroduce the Ordinance. These additional changes include:
- Correction of references to MCSRA to reference correct laws. - Modification to definitions and other provisions to maintain consistency with MAUCSRA. - Correction of Section references and/or drafting errors. - Clarification regarding the counting of Delivery and Distribution Permits, based on the provisions of MAUCRSA.
- Clarify that applicants charged or convicted of a crime within the past ten years are ineligible to receive permits, except for cannabis-related crimes that were considered legal by the respective State at the time the crime occurred.

Resolution to Grant Staff Discretion in Developing Permit Review Processes As noted above, one of the changes to the Ordinance is to empower staff, through the Selection Committee, to develop and implement review processes for applications for a commercial cannabis business. The current law requires all materials to be adopted by the City Council – while this method does have the positive advantage of being thoroughly vetted in a public setting, it also makes it much more difficult for staff to respond quickly to new information, and requires Council action for relatively minor changes. Under the new Ordinance, staff would continue to inform Council on a regular basis regarding the application process, as well as the industry generally, and Council would be able to provide feedback to staff. Applications guidelines would continue to be published and be available for the public, and staff would be available to respond to questions.

For example, Council has requested that staff examine the possibility of conducting some sort of closed review for applications that we not approved in the first round. Under current law, since Council has adopted a previous Resolution indicating the process to be followed, staff would need to prepare a new permitting process for Council approval, which could take several weeks. This process would need to be repeated for every round, with significant modifications requiring new Council action, potentially delaying processing of applications, depending on the issue. Under the proposed Resolution and Ordinance, staff could develop details around Council principles, and could make adjustments as necessary during the process.

On balance, staff believes that the advantages gained from flexibility and responsiveness outweigh any potential disadvantages created by requiring that all rule changes go through the City Council, and recommends that Council support the Resolution. The Resolution does stipulate that the next round of review would include only those applications submitted in the first round; a proposed permitting process has been provided later in this Report.

Page | 5
Resolution Implementing the Tax Provisions included in Chapter 19A In November 2016, Salinas voters approved Measure L, which added Chapter 19A to the Salinas Municipal Code. This Chapter defines taxes that are to be disbursed by commercial cannabis businesses to the City of Salinas (these taxes are in addition to taxes and fees associated with other business types). Taxes would initially be set at $15/square foot of canopy space for cultivation, and 5% of gross receipts for Manufacturing, Delivery, and Dispensary businesses; in May 2019, these amounts would increase to $25/square foot and 10% of gross receipts, respectively, with annual increases to the cultivation tax annually thereafter. Chapter 19A also provides collection procedures for the tax and interest rates and penalties for making late payments.

Chapter 19A-10.120 indicates that late payments shall be subject to a 25% penalty, plus an interest rate to be determined by the Council. This Resolution would set that interest rate at 1% per quarter.

NEXT STEPS:

Upon acceptance by the Council of the Ordinance and Resolutions included in this Report, staff intends to proceed with implementation as defined below. No action is being requested of Council regarding the information below; rather, it is being provided so that Council may provide feedback and input to staff.

Permit Round 1B
During the last Council meeting, Council requested that staff explore the possibility of awarding the additional permits created by the updated Ordinance to the applicants who applied for but did not receive a permit, or to conduct a new review in a “closed” round of applications. Upon review, staff proposes the following:
- Staff would conduct a follow-up, “closed” round for only those applicants that applied for permits but were not approved in Round 1 (Round 1B). A list of applicants in each category who would be eligible to participate in this round, including Round 1 final scores, is attached to this Report.
- The Selection Committee would include the same staff members (Andrew Myrick, Megan Hunter, and Matt Pressey) in order to maintain the institutional knowledge for these applications. The fourth member, formerly occupied by Hdl Consultants, would be filled by David Shaw from the Salinas Police Department.
- Prior to September 14 (the effective date of the Ordinance), the Selection Committee would meet with the applicants and provide detailed feedback regarding the rationale for awarding the scores that they were awarded. This would enable the applicants to make any needed corrections and develop updated materials. Staff would use the opportunity to develop a revised single-phase review process with an updated scoring rubric. - On and around September 14, applicants would be allowed to indicate their continued interest in obtaining a permit from the City, and would be allowed to submit additional information to supplement their original application. There would be no application fee. - The Selection Committee would review the materials, conduct interviews, and score the applications between September 18, 2017 and October 6, 2017. Given the limited number Page | 6
of applicants and most Committee Member’s familiarity with the applications, staff believes this timeframe is realistic.
- The Selection Committee would announce any additional permits to be awarded during the week of October 9, but no later than October 13, 2017.

Permit Round 2
If any permits remain unallocated after Round 1B, staff will explore the possibility of implementing a second, open permitting round. Depending on response and interest, staff may afterwards continue to open future Rounds, or may develop an “open application” process.

Administrative Permits
Staff will develop forms and procedures for the issuance of Administrative Permits. It is anticipated that these will be completed by the effective date of the Ordinance (September 14).

Work Permits
The Ordinance requires all potential employees for commercial cannabis businesses to obtain a Work Permit from the Police Department. The Police Department currently has procedures in place for conducting background checks on prospective card room employees. The Department feels that these procedures would be adequate and appropriate for screening potential employees of commercial cannabis businesses. Internal procedures require slightly more development, but it is expected that the Department will be prepared to begin the intake of applications in the near future.

Monitoring/Reporting
The City Manager’s Office will provide support in maintaining a record of important dates and events, such as renewals, and in the collection of data at the time of renewal. Updates to the Council regarding the performance and the impact of commercial cannabis industry on both the economy and the municipal operations of City of Salinas will be provided at regular intervals as stipulated in the Ordinance.

Impact of City Operations/Establishment of Fee Structure During the July 11 City Council meeting, Council requested information regarding the ongoing costs the City may incur in monitoring and regulating these types of businesses. As it is very difficult to estimate at this time what the City costs would be in a comprehensive fashion, staff has analyzed the likely impacts of individual actions on specific Departments. These impacts are summarized below:

Page | 7
City Attorney’s Office
- Review and Interpretation of City Ordinances
o This is a standard service provided to the City. Staff will monitor time spent on this activity, and, if the amounts are excessive, will return to Council with a remedy at a later date.
- Assistance in the Review and Drafting of Commercial Cannabis Permit Applications o The City will charge Permit Application Fees to offset these costs. These fees will be examined regularly.

City Manager’s Office
- Review of Administrative Permits
o Minor costs for time and application development, to be offset by fees collected. - Coordination of Selection Committee
o Inconsistent but significant time investment selecting and managing Selection Committee. Costs to be offset by permit application fees. - Reporting and Departmental Coordination
o Coordination of efforts between Departments, and collection of data from multiple sources to provide periodic reports to Council and Community. Potentially significant time investment, offset by monitoring fee.
- Tracking of Significant Dates (ie expiration dates)
o Moderate costs to be made up from collection of monitoring fee.

Community Development Department
- Review of Land Use Permit Applications
o Unknown staff time investment, a significant portion of which would be offset through Permit application fees.
- Code Enforcement Activity
o Unknown costs ranging from negligible to very significant, depending on the number and validity of complaints. Costs to be offset through cost recovery fees and citation payments.

Fire Department
- Compliance Inspections
o Fire Inspectors are required to conduct annual inspections of all businesses. Costs are offset through fees.
- Review of Permits and Hazardous Materials Plans
o Minor to Moderate costs of staff time, offset through the collection of permit application fees.
- Emergency Response
o Response to 911 calls or as otherwise needed, as with all businesses. Unknown whether incidence of these responses will exceed normal baseline levels. Cost recovery may be possible depending on the individual circumstances.

Page | 8
Police Department
- Emergency Response
o Response to 911 calls or as otherwise needed. Unknown whether incidence of these responses will exceed normal baseline levels. Cost recovery may be possible depending on the individual circumstances.
- Tracking of Incidents
o Minor to significant (depending on frequency and type of calls made) costs, potentially offset through monitoring fees.
- Review of Permits and Site Security Plans
o Minor to Moderate Costs of Staff time, to be offset through permit application fees. - Review and processing of Work Permits/ Issue Cannabis ID Cards o Significant staff time for permit intake and processing, to be offset through permit application fees.

As noted, in several instances the activities mentioned include activities pursued as a normal part of business, and fees are already in place to cover the City’s costs of implementation. There are additional fees which will need to be established or modified to cover some of these costs – however staff is still analyzing the appropriate fee amounts. Staff will present a Resolution establishing any necessary fees to the Council prior to the effective date of the Ordinance.

Recreational Use
Recreational (or Adult) use is not addressed here. Staff anticipates bringing an updated Ordinance and/or Resolution, as deemed appropriate, prior to the effective date for the legalization of recreational cannabis businesses (January 1, 2018).

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

The City Council’s approval of the proposed Ordinance and/or Resolutions is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. [CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3)] STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

The City Council’s approval of the proposed Ordinance and/or Resolutions is not among the City Council’s current goals and objectives as identified in the City Council’s current Strategic Plan.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

The various items are expected to have the following financial impacts:
1) The proposed Ordinance would most likely generate unknown but significant additional revenues for the City relative to existing law. This would primarily be accomplished by the proposed increases in the number of available permits, which would in turn provide an Page | 9
increase in revenues. Although increasing the number of permits could also result in an increase in City costs associated with permitting, monitoring, and enforcement, it is expected, although not assured, that revenues generated would be significantly greater than costs incurred.
2) The proposed Resolution providing additional staff discretion in structuring the permitting process would result in minor reductions to staff time and costs due to modifications in procedures.
3) The proposed Resolution establishing procedures to implement Chapter 19A would establish the interest rate for late payments and allow staff to begin collection of the appropriate taxes, which would likely result in additional revenues being brought in to the City of Salinas. The exact amount will vary depending on the number of businesses and their commercial success, but it is expected to be significant. The use of these funds would be unrestricted and could be used for general governmental purposes.

It should be noted that these projections are based only on existing law and the proposed Ordinance. A review of the potential impacts of permitting or not permitting recreational cannabis will be provided at a later date.

ATTACHMENTS:

Proposed Ordinance Amending Chapter 16B of the Salinas Municipal Code Proposed Resolution Granting Discretion to Staff in Developing Permit Application Procedures Proposed Resolution Establishing the Interest Rate for Unpaid Cannabis Tax Round 1B Eligible Applicants and Round 1 Scores

Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: September 5, 2017
DEPARTMENT: CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
FROM: Christopher A. Callihan, City Attorney
TITLE: City Code Update
RECOMMENDED MOTION:

Adopt the proposed Ordinance to update and to recodify various Chapters and Articles of the Salinas Municipal Code.

RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council adopt the proposed Ordinance.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Beginning in early 2017, the City Attorney’s began a comprehensive review and update of the City Code. The purpose of this effort is to identify and to remove outdated provisions of the City Code, as well as to identify opportunities to streamline and to modernize City regulations and codified in the City Code. Chapter 1 through Chapter 3 have been updated, as well as one Article of Chapter 4 (related to the Airport and Airport regulations). This proposed Ordinance updates Chapter 5 which will now be titled “Public Peace and Public Morals.” This Chapter includes the Public Art Program and if the proposed Ordinance is adopted will also include regulations pertaining to Fireworks, Graffiti, Massage Businesses and Technicians, Card Rooms, Bingo, and Commercial Cannabis Businesses. Much of the regulations are recodifications of existing provisions, but some provisions of existing Chapter 6 are proposed to be repealed as being outdated and unnecessary.

ANALYSIS:

Update to Chapter 5 of the Salinas Municipal Code.

Continuing the effort to review and to update the City Code, Chapter 5 is the next proposed to be updated. Chapter 5, titled “Public Peace and Public Morals,” currently consists of only one Article:

Article I, the Public Art Program. Proposed to be included in updated Chapter 5 are the following Articles:

Page | 2

1. Article I, Public Art Program. This is a new Ordinance adopted by the City Council in early 2017.

2. Article II, Fireworks. This is a recodification of existing Chapter 13A. Chapter 13A consists of regulations on the possession and the use of fireworks. These regulations remain unchanged through the proposed recodification as Chapter 13A exists as the result of a voter initiative approved in 2016. Because Chapter 13A was put into the City Code by voter initiative, the City Council cannot change the provisions of Chapter 13A absent voter approval.

3. Article III, Graffiti. This is a recodification of Chapter 14A. No amendments to the graffiti regulations are proposed with this update.

4. Article IV, Regulation of Massage Businesses and Technicians. This is a recodification of Chapter 16A. Chapter 16A was updated in May 2015 as a result in changes to State law.

No amendments to the massage businesses and technician regulations are proposed with this update.

5. Article V, Card Rooms. This is a recodification of Article IV of Chapter 6. The City’s regulations on card rooms were last updated in 2011 when Bankers Casino began operating. The provisions of Article IV of Chapter 6 were reviewed by staff at the California Gambling Control Commission, as required by State law. No amendments to the City’s card room regulations are proposed with this update; any updates would be subject to the prior review and approval of the Gambling Control Commission prior to the City’s adoption thereof.

6. Article VI, Bingo. This is a recodification of Article V of Chapter 6. The City’s bingo regulations are current and up-to-date. As such, no amendments to the City’s bingo regulations are proposed with this update.

7. Article VII, Commercial Cannabis Businesses. This is a recodification of Chapter 16B.

The City Council recently (August 15, 2017) updated the City’s regulations on Commercial Cannabis Businesses, so no amendments are proposed with this update.

Additional articles will be added to updated Chapter 5 in the next phase of the City Code update.

Repeal of Articles Within Chapter 6.

The proposed Ordinance recodifies two of the existing six Articles of Chapter 6. The remaining Articles are either outdated and unnecessary or are already repealed and exist only as placeholders.

The proposed Ordinance would eliminate all of the remaining Articles of Chapter 6 and reserve it for future use. Following is a list of the Articles and their subject matter:

Article I, In General. This Article contains general provisions related to games and amusement activities including, for example, regulations against minors playing pinball machines and the prohibition of certain games (billiards, dice, cards) in close proximity to schools and location restrictions on the sale or service of alcohol near schools. These regulations are now incorporated Page | 3
into other sections of the City Code or in permits and approvals for uses which include those sorts of activities. There is no longer a need for a general Article for those purposes.

Article II, Public Dances. These provisions were originally codified in 1935 through Ordinance No. 200. The City has the authority to regulate public dances, however, the provisions of Article II are no longer in effect. For example, Article II requires a permit for any public dance held in any place in the City. No such permits have been issued in recent years and to the extent any such dance would constitute a special event, there is a separate process in the Municipal Code for such events. There is no longer a need for an Article regulating public dances.

Article III, Pool Rooms, Billiard Parlors, Card Tables, etc. Codified into the Municipal Code in 1954 and 1959, the City’s regulations embodied in this Article are outdated and are no longer enforced. Section 6-26 requires any person wanting to operate a pool or billiard hall to obtain a permit from the City Manager. This Article also contains restrictions on operating hours and a prohibition on the presence of minors in such businesses. No permits have been issued by the City Manager for a pool or billiard hall in recent years. The City has the authority to regulate such businesses, however, those regulations can be incorporated into planning-level permits, for example, rather than through a separate business-specific permit. Additionally, all of the City’s card room regulations are codified in a more-recent Article (Article 5 of updated Chapter 5).

Article IV, Card Rooms. This Article is proposed to be recodified to Article 5 of updated Chapter

5. As discussed above, the card room regulations are unchanged through this codification.

Article V, Bingo. This Article is proposed to be recodified to Article 6 of updated Chapter 5. As discussed above, the bingo regulations are unchanged through this recodification.

Article VI, Fortunetelling. This Article was repealed through Ordinance No. 2131 (N.C.S.).

Recodification Table.

Attached to this Report is the most-recent version of the Recodification Table. This Table shows the different changes made and movements made to those Chapters and those Articles affected by the City Code update.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

The City Council’s approval of the proposed Ordinance and/or Resolutions is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. [CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3)] STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

While not a specific item in the current Strategic Plan, the proposed Ordinance supports the City Council’s efforts to promote an effective, sustainable government. Having current, up-to-date Page | 4
regulations in place and removing unnecessary requirements can have the effect of supporting economic development activity.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

No impact to the City’s General Fund or Measures V or G are anticipated with the adoption of the proposed Ordinance.

ATTACHMENTS:

Proposed Ordinance
Recodification Table

Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: NOVEMBER 7, 2017
DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE
FROM: ANDREW MYRICK, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MANAGER
TITLE: UPDATE TO CANNABIS ORDINANCE
RECOMMENDED MOTION:

Staff Recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed Ordinance amending Chapter 5, Article VII of the Salinas Municipal Code.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the Council adopt the attached Ordinance..

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The attached Ordinance would establish the parameters for the operation of all adult-use and medicinal commercial cannabis activities, provide regulation for the growing of cannabis for personal use, and regulate both of these so as to preserve the quality of life for residents that choose not to engage in these activities.

BACKGROUND:

History of Cannabis Regulations
Chapter 5, Article VII (formerly Chapter 16B) of the Salinas Municipal Code regulates the commercial cannabis industry. Under Proposition 64, passed by California voters in November 2016, the use of cannabis by adults 21 years and over for non-medicinal purposes (defined as “adult-use” in the law and colloquially referred to as “recreational use”) will be legal in the State of California effective January 1, 2018.

The City of Salinas has previously adopted two Ordinances. The first is Chapter 19A of the Municipal Code, which was adopted by the voters in November 2016, and places taxes upon commercial cannabis businesses engaging in Cultivation, Manufacturing, Delivery, and Dispensary uses. The second is Chapter 5, Article VII (originally adopted as Chapter 16B but relocated to Chapter 5, Article VII in September 2017), which regulates the operations of commercial cannabis businesses in Salinas. This second Chapter was amended in August 2017 in order to bring it into alignment with several provisions of the California Medicinal and Adult-Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (MAUCRSA), which was adopted by the State in June 2017.

Page | 2
However, the August amendment left open the question of whether the City of Salinas would prohibit commercial cannabis businesses from engaging in the adult-use market.

This Ordinance attempts to address a number of items, each of which is discussed in more detail below:
1) Growth of Cannabis for Personal Consumption
2) Adult-Use Commercial Cannabis Activity
3) Permitting Procedures
4) Regulations
ANALYSIS:

Growth of Cannabis for Personal Consumption (“Personal Grow”) Under State Law, a person may now have up to six living plants at their residence for their own personal use. Local jurisdictions may not prohibit growing these plants inside a residence or an enclosed accessory structure (such as a shed), although a jurisdiction may adopt “reasonable regulations.” The attached Ordinance proposes several regulations to clarify the requirements.

Jurisdictions may prohibit the cultivation of cannabis outdoors – this Ordinance would do so. At this point, the primary concerns among staff relate to potential odors from the plants (particularly given that most schools and parks are located in residential areas) as well as potential security concerns that could arise.

Under MAUCRSA, by prohibiting the growing of cannabis outdoors for personal use, the City would be ineligible for a particular grant established by that law that would be available through the California Board of State and Community Corrections. These grants would be funded through State taxes collected from cannabis businesses, and could be used to law enforcement, fire protection, or other local programs addressing public health and safety associated with the implementation of MAUCRSA. However, because these grants would be funded through taxes collected from cannabis businesses, the level of funding is unknown at this time, and the grants would likely not be available until the second half of 2018 at the earliest. Staff recommends that outdoor grows be prohibited for the time being, while the experiences of jurisdictions that choose to permit these grows are studied. Once more information about the potential grant opportunity becomes available, the City will be able to reassess whether the prohibition on outdoor grows is appropriate.

Staff explored the possibility of establishing a required administrative permit for Personal Grows.

While there would be potential benefits to knowing the locations of these uses and ensuring through the permit that those engaging in a Personal Grow would be aware of the requirements, it was determined that requiring a permit of this type would create a significant burden on staffing resources. Therefore, staff is recommending that no permit be required at this time. However, staff will analyze data from Code Enforcement activities related to this subject and will provide additional information on this topic in the next Council update to determine whether a permit would be necessary.

Page | 3
Adult-Use Commercial Cannabis Activity
There are six types of commercial cannabis businesses that may be permitted by the City of Salinas: Cultivation, Delivery, Dispensary, Distribution, Manufacturing, and Testing Laboratories.

Commercial Cannabis Activity is currently limited to activities related to the medicinal market, with the exception of Testing Laboratories (as described below).

This Ordinance proposes to permit all businesses to engage in either or both the adult-use and medicinal markets; however, retailers (Delivery and Dispensary) would be required to participate in the medicinal market regardless of whether they also wish to engage in the adult use market.

This requirement is to ensure that medicinal products remain available to Salinas residents. The total number of permits authorized by the Code would not be increased (ie there would not be separate “medicinal” and “adult-use” permits).

Staff is aware that there is a high level of controversy in allowing businesses to engage in the adultuse market. Staff has approached this analysis under the principal that while adult-use cannabis usage is undesirable, its use has also been permitted by the voters of the State of California, and any actions taken by the City must focus on how the City can take advantage of this reality while mitigating negative impacts. Additionally, staff has approached this on the principal that medicinal cannabis can and does treat many actual medical conditions, and that residents that would benefit from this should continue to have access.

Regardless of the actions of the City, residents will have access to legal cannabis through other jurisdictions, and will in fact be able to grow their own. Also, the legal market is unlikely to totally eliminate the illegal market, and legal businesses will need to continue to be competitive if they are to survive. If the legal market fails, the City would be supplied with cannabis only through the illegal market, but with significantly less ability to ensure that operations do not detract from resident’s quality of life. Given these parameters, it is the opinion of staff that prohibition would be ineffective at curtailing the potential destructive impacts, but would reduce the potential positive benefits to the City.

A more detailed summary of staff’s analysis on the impacts of adding adult-use cannabis to the existing operations currently allowed for medicinal cannabis for each type of business is below:
1) Analytical Type (Testing Facilities) – These facilities deal in only very minute amounts of cannabis with little to no market value. Furthermore, as there is little cannabis on-site, the impacts on surrounding areas would be no greater than any other laboratory, which is generally a low-impact use. Jobs created in these facilities would generally be higher-skill and higher-wage technical positions. The State heavily regulates these facilities. State law explicitly states that Testing Facilities may engage in testing both medicinal and adult-use cannabis and cannabis products. Given all this, staff believes that the public interest is best served by allowing this business type to participate in the adult-use market. 2) Industrial Businesses (Cultivation, Manufacturing, and Distribution) – These businesses have no public interaction. However, they have the capability of meeting consumer demand not only in the City of Salinas, but throughout the State of California. These Page | 4
businesses would be the largest job generators of all cannabis industry types, and as their sales increase so would their economic impact. Security requirements being imposed by the City of Salinas are significant. However, given their larger market, the growth of industrial businesses here in Salinas shouldn’t have any impact on local consumption, which would be a mix of products produced locally and from out-of-the area. Prohibiting the growing, manufacture, or transport of adult-use cannabis would put our businesses at a significant disadvantage over their competitors while doing little if anything to impact cannabis usage. Given the lack of benefits of prohibition, coupled with the real harm caused by not permitting it, staff recommends the allowance of adult-use cannabis for industrial processes.
3) Retail Businesses (Delivery, Dispensary) – These businesses are the ones that interact with the customers and sell cannabis directly to the public. This point-of-sale means that the operations of these businesses will have a potentially greater impact on the community than other business types.

Dispensaries operate as a physical point-of-sale. Staff believes the potential negative impacts of dispensaries engaging in adult-use cannabis would be similar to those of a liquor store – however, like liquor stores, if properly regulated, these impacts can be mitigated and the business can coexist with its neighbors. Currently, these businesses are required to engage in a number of measures to enhance site security (such as buzz-in doors and internal and external security), implement a track-and-trace program, and provide guidance to customers at the site. Staff believes that these procedures, coupled with the ability of the City to immediately shut down any businesses found to be operating in a manner that would constitute a nuisance, would keep the impacts minimal.

Staff examined several alternatives to allowing adult-use cannabis to be sold at dispensaries. Total prohibition of sales of adult-use was considered – however, given that the products could be obtained from elsewhere, including other jurisdictions, the illegal market, or even grown at home, this was deemed to be ineffective. Staff also examined whether segregating adult-use and medicinal cannabis would have a positive impact – none were identified, and doing so may have necessitated an increase in the number of permits and created challenges for businesses to respond to shifting demands. Given the options available, staff believes that the best option is for the Council to allow the sale of adult-use cannabis at dispensaries, with the understanding that permittees will need to work hard to prevent their business from becoming a nuisance to the neighborhood.

Delivery businesses have a very different set of challenges, as there is no centralized point of sale. However, the point of sale could potentially occur anywhere. Medicinal Delivery is already permitted, so staff examined the impacts of adult-use delivery. After analysis, staff is recommending that adult-use cannabis be permitted for delivery.

This conclusion is based upon an analysis of the alternatives. The City has the option of prohibiting Deliveries within the City. While this is legally permissible, it would be very difficult to enforce. Furthermore, although the City can regulate and tax businesses within the City, those from outside the City could continue to do so (and collect tax revenue for Page | 5
their respective jurisdiction), and the City would have a greatly reduced ability to respond to concerns. Furthermore, even if the legal market could be stopped, residents could grow their own cannabis, and the illegal market would still be available. Given that allowing the delivery of adult-use cannabis would provide the City with the most leverage in dealing with the businesses, would provide the most revenue to the City, and would likely occur whether the City allows it or not, staff is recommending that Delivery businesses be allowed to sell cannabis for adult-use. However, staff is recommending several new restrictions to the actual delivery of cannabis in Salinas, including a prohibition of delivering within 1,000 feet of a school, park, or daycare center (unless it is to a private residence).

Permitting Procedures (Division 3)
The Ordinance provides a reorganization of various sections to provide clarity regarding the permits that are available and which requirements apply to which permit types. Procedures for amending existing permits have also been added.

Regulations (Divisions 4 through 10)
Many regulations have been modified, added, and deleted due to information obtained through the regulation of the industry up to this point.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

The City Council’s approval of the proposed Ordinance and/or Resolutions is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. [CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3)] STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

The City Council’s approval of the proposed Ordinance and/or Resolutions is not among the City Council’s current goals and objectives as identified in the City Council’s current Strategic Plan.

FISCAL AND SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

Enabling Industrial-Type businesses to engage in the Adult-Use Market would make them more competitive and likely more successful than they would be if limited to the medicinal market.

Allowing the sale of Adult-Use Cannabis would likely result in a significant increase in revenues, particularly given that medicinal products are exempt from sales and use tax.

Personal Grows may result in an increase in the number of response requests for service from City Departments, which would result in unknown costs to the City; however, the City has not allowed any uses other than what the State has already permitted, and the City can mitigate its costs by responding to complaints through Code Enforcement, rather than the Police Department.

Page | 6
It should be noted that these projections are based only on existing law and the proposed Ordinance. State regulations have not yet been released as of the date this Report was authored, and it is unknown how any potential regulations would interact with the Ordinance to impact the financial impact.

ATTACHMENTS:

Proposed Ordinance Amending Chapter 5, Article VII of the Salinas Municipal Code Redlined Ordinance Showing Proposed Changes
Page | 1

CITY OF SALINAS

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT
DATE: JUNE 5, 2024
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: COURTNEY GROSSMAN, PLANNING MANAGER
BY: LISA BRINTON, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
CHRISTOPHER A. CALLIHAN, CITY ATTORNEY
TITLE: COMMERCIAL CANNABIS PERMIT 2023-007; APPEAL OF

SELECTION COMMITTEE DETERMINATION
RECOMMENDATION:

Consider the appeal of CannaCruz, Inc. from the Selection Committee’s denial of CannaCruz’s application for a major amendment to Commercial Cannabis Permit 2023-007 to relocate an existing Cannabis Dispensary with accessory Delivery and Distribution from 1156 Abbott Street to 1228 South Main Street.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

On April 29, 2024, CannaCruz, Inc. (“CannaCruz”) submitted an application for a major amendment (“Amendment Application”) to Commercial Cannabis Permit 2023-007 (“CCP 2023- 007”) to relocate an existing Cannabis Dispensary with accessory Delivery and Distribution from 1156 Abbott Street to 1228 South Main Street. Following the City Attorney’s determination that the Amendment Application contained all the required information, the Amendment Application was forwarded to the Selection Committee appointed by the Interim City Manager for their review in accordance with Article VII of Chapter 5 of the Salinas Municipal Code. On May 14, 2024, the Selection Committee met to consider the Amendment Application and at that meeting denied the Amendment Application. On May 16, 2024, CannaCruz submitted the present appeal of the Selection Committee’s denial of the Amendment Application.

DISCUSSION:

Background:

On January 26, 2016, the Salinas City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2566 allowing for the Page | 2
establishment, operation, and regulation of commercial cannabis businesses for the dispensing, distribution, cultivation, and manufacturing of medical marijuana and medical marijuana products. (A copy of the City Council’s January 26, 2016, Report to the City Council and of Ordinance No. 2566 (N.C.S.) are attached to this report for reference. Ordinance No. 2566 repealed a prohibition on the establishment and operation of medical marijuana cultivation facilities and manufacturing facilities, allowed for a limited number of commercial cannabis businesses to open and to operate, provided for a competitive process for the limited number of commercial cannabis permits, and imposed operating restrictions on such businesses in order to protect neighboring properties and businesses from the negative effects of commercial cannabis businesses and in order to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the general public. In adopting the ordinance, the City Council found that reasonable regulations on commercial cannabis businesses were necessary to address the negative impacts and nuisance impacts of such businesses. At the time of the City Council’s adoption of Ordinance No. 2566, one medical marijuana edible manufacturing and wholesale distribution facility had begun operating in the city prior to the City’s having established any land use controls or requirements on the operation of such businesses. Included among the regulations included in Ordinance No. 2566 were restrictions on the proximity of commercial cannabis businesses to sensitive uses. The City Council also found that without regulations on the operation of commercial cannabis businesses, there would be an immediate threat to the public health, safety, and welfare from the establishment of commercial cannabis businesses in the City.

The City Council subsequently amended Ordinance No. 2566 (the City’s commercial cannabis business regulations) on three occasions:
a. Ordinance No. 2597 (N.C.S.) adopted on August 15, 2017, increased the maximum number of permits which may be issued in the dispensary, manufacturing, and cultivation categories; provided for an administrative process for cannabis testing facilities; and included administrative revisions to the City’s commercial cannabis regulations to reflect changes in state law and changes in the City’s implementation of the commercial cannabis business regulations. (A copy of Ordinance No. 2597 and the associated Report to the City Council are attached to this report for reference.)
b. Ordinance No. 2598 (N.C.S.) adopted on September 5, 2017, recodified several chapters and articles of the Salinas Municipal Code, including those related to the regulations on commercial cannabis businesses. No changes were made to the content of those provisions outlining the regulations on commercial cannabis businesses. (A copy of Ordinance No. 2598 (N.C.S.) and the associated Report to the City Council are attached to this report for reference.)
c. Ordinance No. 2600 (N.C.S.) adopted on November 29, 2017, updated the regulations on commercial cannabis businesses codified at Article VII of Chapter 5 of the Salinas Municipal Code. Specifically, Ordinance No. 2600 specified that businesses involving adult-use cannabis and cannabis products may operate within the city. Ordinance No. 2600 also clarified the City’s permitting structure for commercial cannabis businesses, clarified the operating requirements of various types of commercial cannabis businesses, established Page | 3
reasonable regulations relating to the growing of cannabis within a private residence for personal use, and included administrative changes to the regulations to reflect changes in state law and in the City’s implementation of the Salinas Municipal Code. (A copy of Ordinance No. 2600 (N.C.S.) and the associated Staff Report to the City Council are attached to this report for reference.)
CannaCruz’s Proposed Relocation to 1228 South Main Street In the context of the above-described commercial cannabis regulations, in late 2021, CannaCruz began the process of attempting to relocate from its current location at 1156 Abbott Street to its proposed location at 1228 South Main Street. In response to CannaCruz’s request for zoning information related to the 1228 South Main Street location, in a Zoning Information Letter dated December 15, 2021, the City identified that the proposed location was within 1,000 feet of six sensitive uses identified in the Salinas Municipal Code (section 5-07.27) including five alcoholrelated uses and one church. (A copy of the City’s December 15, 2021, letter is attached to this report for reference.) The Zoning Information Letter did not identify the proposed location’s adjacency to a residential use as an issue of concern.

Based on this information, CannaCruz continued the process of relocating to the proposed location and on August 23, 2022, submitted an application for Conditional Use Permit 2022-048 (CUP 2022-048) to change the use at 1228 South Main Street from Retail to a proposed two-tenant Shopping Center within an existing 20,162 square-foot building. The two tenant uses include a 9,413 square-foot retail furniture store in the front portion (Unit “A”) of the building and a 10,749 square-foot Cannabis Dispensary with accessory Delivery and Distribution retail use in the rear portion (Unit “B”). CUP 2022-048 also includes the allowance of a 41-space (51%) Parking Reduction per Zoning Code Table 37-50.100, exception from the requirements of Zoning Code Section 37-50.200 to allow for internal waste storage to be located within the existing structure, and Alternative Means of Compliance for landscaping Planning Commission consideration is required for Parking Reductions exceeding 30%. On August 24, 2023, an application was submitted for an amendment to their Commercial Cannabis Permit to relocate to the proposed location.

April 3, 2024, Planning Commission Meeting
On April 3, 2024, the Planning Commission considered CUP 2022-048. CCP 2023-007 was also originally scheduled to be considered by the Planning Commission on April 3, 2024, however, due to concerns from the City Attorney and the Community Development Director with the completeness of the application, CCP 2023-007 was not presented to the Planning Commission for consideration.

On April 3, 2024, the Planning Commission denied CannaCruz’s application for CUP 2022-048.

Planning Commissioners expressed concern that the amendment to CCP 2023-007 should be considered concurrently with CUP 2022-048. Planning Commissioners also commented that consideration of amendments to CCP 2023-007 should be deferred to the City Council as a policy Page | 4
consideration. In a letter dated April 17, 2024, CannaCruz appealed the Planning Commission’s April 3, 2024, decision to deny CannaCruz’s application for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP 2022- 048). (A copy of CannaCruz’s April 17, 2024, letter is attached to this report for reference.) The appeal was originally scheduled for City Council consideration on June 11, 2024, in order to meet the sixty-day period required by Salinas Municipal Code section 37-60.1300; however, CannaCruz agreed to continue the appeal before the Salinas City Council to June 18, 2024. (A copy of CannaCruz’s May 21, 2024, email agreeing to continue the appeal to June 18, 2024, is attached to this report for reference.)
Commercial Cannabis Permits—Amendment Procedures
The holder of a Commercial Cannabis Permit issued by the City may request amendments to their permits pursuant to the procedures outlined in Salinas Municipal Code section 5-07.09. Pursuant to section 5-07.09, the holder of a Commercial Cannabis Permit may request a change to the business location by submitting all items normally required for a new application, except that information related to the principals or operations that will remain unchanged and are not directly related to the site may be excluded. The application for a change to the business location must submit all items normally required for a new application as outlined on section 5-07.07.

On April 29, 2024, CannaCruz submitted an Amendment Application to relocate its existing Cannabis Dispensary with accessory Delivery and Distribution from 1156 Abbott Street to 1228 South Main Street. (A copy of CannaCruz’s Amendment Application is attached to this report for reference.) On May 7, 2024, the City Attorney determined the Amendment Application to contain all of the required information and forwarded the Amendment Application to the Selection Committee for their review. (A copy of the City Attorney’s May 7, 2024, letter is attached to this report for reference.)
Selection Committee’s Determination and Findings
As outlined in section 5-07.09(a)(2) the Selection Committee is required to review the proposed new location and may approve an amendment to the new location if it can make the following findings:
a. The new site would not be located within the distances specified in section 5-07.27, unless an exception is approved pursuant that section;
b. The relocation to the new site would not create any significant negative impacts greater than those that existed at the original site;
c. The proposed location is located in an appropriate zoning district for the proposed use; and d. Owners of real property located within three hundred feet of the proposed site have been notified and have had an opportunity to provide information to the City regarding the proposed site.

On May 14, 2024, the Selection Committee met to consider the Amendment Application and at that meeting denied the Amendment Application. During that meeting, the Selection Committee Page | 5
conveyed their reasons for the denial and the findings of fact upon which their decision was based to the City Attorney. In a letter to Trinh Retterer and Peter D. Brazil dated May 15, 2024, the City Attorney informed CannaCruz that the Selection Committee had denied CannaCruz’s Amendment Application and also informed CannaCruz of the reasons for the denial. (A copy of the City Attorney’s May 15, 2024, letter is attached to this Report for reference.) As described in the May 15, 2024, letter, the Selection Committee denied CannaCruz’s Amendment Application for the following reasons:
a. The proposed location (1228 South Main Street) is located within 1,000 feet of two sensitive uses listed in section 5-07.27: a smoke-shop (Clout Nine Smoke Shop) located at 1152 South Main Street and a location where alcohol is sold or served for individual consumption on the premises (Ellis’ Restaurant) located at 1250 South Main Street; the proposed location is immediately adjacent to the alcohol related use. The Selection Committee did not find that the intent of Article VII of Chapter 5 of the Salinas Municipal Code, as outlined in section 5-07.01, could otherwise be met. b. The proposed location (1228 South Main Street) is located adjacent to a residential use and, therefore, a determination must be made by either the Police Chief or the Community Development Director as to whether the operation of a commercial cannabis business at this location would tend to cause a public nuisance or a situation which may result in repeated police department response or a negative impact on the adjacent residential uses as required by section 5-07.27(d).
c. Article VII of Chapter 5 of the Salinas Municipal Code reflects the City’s policy and intent that commercial cannabis businesses should not be located in proximity to sensitive uses and reflects the City’s overall master planning perspective that commercial cannabis businesses are best suited for industrial or commercial areas that are not in proximity to sensitive uses, including residential areas.

On May 16, 2024, pursuant to Salinas Municipal Code section 5-07.10 CannaCruz timely submitted the present appeal of the Selection Committee’s denial of the Amendment Application. (A copy of CannaCruz’s May 16, 2024, appeal of the Selection Committee’s denial is attached to this report for reference.)
Police Department Considerations
The Salinas Police Department issued three memoranda related to CannaCruz’s Amendment Application: February 26, 2024; March 16, 2024; and March 19, 2024. (The Police Department memoranda are attached to this report for reference.)
The February 26, 2024, Memorandum specifically addressed only the proposed parking layout at the 1228 South Main Street location and concluded there are “no issues with the parking lot layout.” The February 26, 2024, Memorandum did not address any other issues related to the proposed relocation, including the findings of the Police Chief pursuant to section 5-07.27(d) due to the proposed location’s adjacency to a residential use.

Page | 6
The March 16, 2024, Memorandum addressed the proposed parking reduction and proposed relocation of CannaCruz to 1228 South Main Street and concluded there are “no issues with the parking reduction or relocation of the dispensary.” The March 16, 2024, Memorandum further concluded that “[a]lthough the subject site is located adjacent to a residential areas, it is the opinion of the Chief of Police that the operation of a Commercial Cannabis business in such location would not tend to cause a public nuisance or a situation which may result in repeated police department response or a negative impact on the adjacent residential units as stipulated by Municipal Code Section 5-07.27(d).” Release of the March 16, 2024, Memorandum was an administrative error:

The Memorandum was not a final draft intended for distribution.

The March 19, 2024, Memorandum replaced the March 16, 2024, Memorandum and addressed the proposed parking reduction and relocation of CannaCruz to 1228 South Main Street location and concluded that there “are no issues with the parking reduction or relocation of the dispensary.” (emphasis in original) The March 19, 2024, Memorandum additionally, however, raised concerns with traffic volumes and a nearby intersection and driveway location which has had approximately eighteen traffic collisions, one being fatal. The March 19, 2024, Memorandum also raised concerns with criminal activity at other cannabis dispensaries in Salinas and elsewhere in Monterey County.

With respect to the proposed location’s adjacency to a residential use, the March 19. 2924, Memorandum concludes that in “the opinion of the Chief of Police…the operation of the Commercial Cannabis business in such location would tend to cause a public nuisance or a situation which may result in repeated police department response or a negative impact on the adjacent residential units as stipulated by Municipal Code Section 5-07.27(d).” Of concern to the Salinas Police Department is the proximity of the proposed location to two sensitive uses identified in the Salinas Municipal Code and the proposed location’s adjacency to a residential use. Elli’s Restaurant is immediately adjacent to the proposed location and includes a bar where alcoholic beverages are served.1 Elli’s Restaurant is a popular location for customers to gather in the bar area to drink alcohol, socialize, and watch sporting events. Alcoholic beverages are also served in the dining portion of the restaurant. The combination of an alcohol related use immediately adjacent to a commercial cannabis business creates the potential for foot traffic between the two locations, including foot traffic from intoxicated individuals along the sidewalk on South Main Street and through the driveway of the proposed location in order to gain access to the proposed location at the rear of the building. As discussed below, this portion of South Main Street contains a high-volume of vehicular traffic regularly traveling at speeds above the posted speed limit. Clout Nine Smoke Shop, a second sensitive use, is located within 1,000 feet of the proposed location.

The proposed location is directly adjacent to a residential apartment complex with ten second floor windows with a direct line of sight to the parking lot of the proposed commercial cannabis business. Customers are anticipated to each take approximately six minutes to complete their transactions which would result in vehicles potentially entering and exiting the parking lot each seven to eight minutes throughout the business’s hours of operation, driving along the fence

1 Three grocery stores at which alcohol is sold are also located within 1,000 feet of the proposed location: Star Market, Lucky’s, and Nob Hill.

Page | 7
separating the proposed location from the adjacent residential use. Depending on the hours of operation, this could mean that vehicles would be entering and exiting the proposed location during the nighttime hours which would require the use of vehicle headlights. This could result in light from the vehicles’ headlights shining into the apartment windows each time a vehicle entered of existed the parking lot. There is also other potential for customers entering and exiting their vehicles to create noise and other impacts on the adjacent residential use including, potentially, the use of cannabis projects in their vehicles and/or the parking lot of the proposed location. These conditions have the potential to create noise impacts on the adjacent residential use and the occupants of the residential units, some of which may be families with children.

There is only one narrow driveway entrance and exit to the proposed location; the narrow width of the driveway makes it difficult for two cars to fit and safely pass each other as they enter and exit the parking located at the rear of the building. The driveway to the proposed location is accessible only by way of southbound South Main Street (a high volume major arterial roadway that leads in one direction to Highway 68) and immediately south of the intersection of South Main Street and Plaza Circle. This location has had seven vehicle collisions in the last four years, one of which was a fatal collision between a vehicle and a cyclist. In the broader area from South Main Street at San Joaquin Street to South Main Street and Blanco Road, there have been eighteen collisions.

Customers of the proposed location would turn over in six-minute increments; customers are anticipated to each take approximately six minutes to complete their transactions.2 With the proposed location anticipated to be a high-volume business (a higher volume business than the previous furniture store use), that would mean that more customers/vehicles than have been present in the past would be entering and exiting the proposed location through a narrow driveway and narrow driveway entrance onto South Main Street every seven to eight minutes. This area of South Main Street has high volumes of traffic which regularly moves at speeds in excess of the posted speed limit.

The conditions discussed above present a threat to the public health, safety, and welfare. It is anticipated that under these conditions establishment of the proposed commercial cannabis business at this proposed location would tend to cause a situation which may result in repeated police department response or a negative impact on the adjacent residential uses.

Alternatives Available to the Commission
The City’s Selection Committee denied CannaCruz’s Amendment Application to relocate its commercial cannabis business to 1228 South Main Street. The reasons for the Selection Committee’s denial are described above and in the attached May 15, 2024, letter. CannaCruz has appealed the Selection Committee’s denial.

The Planning Commission is now asked to consider CannaCruz’s appeal. In doing so, the Planning Commission should consider the City’s commercial cannabis regulations, including the

2 The six-minute customer turnover times were provided by CannaCruz at a May 8, 2024, meeting with City staff.

Page | 8
regulations related to sensitive uses, and how the commercial cannabis regulations apply to CannaCruz’s application to operate a commercial cannabis business at 1228 South Main Street.

The Planning Commission should consider the information presented in this report and the information presented to it during the public hearing on this appeal and should then exercise its discretion and render a decision supported by specifically articulated findings.

The Planning Commission has the following alternatives:

1. Affirm the determination made by the Selection Committee to deny CannaCruz’s application for a major amendment to Commercial Cannabis Permit 2023-007;

2. Reverse the determination made by the Selection Committee to deny CannaCruz’s application for a major amendment to Commercial Cannabis Permit 2023-007;

3. Modify the determination made by the Selection Committee to deny CannaCruz’s application for a major amendment to Commercial Cannabis Permit 2023-007; or

4. Neither affirm, reverse, or modify the Selection Committee’s determination and refer the Selection Committee’s determination and appeal thereof to the City Council for consideration.

Time Consideration:

As discussed above, CannaCruz’s appeal of the Planning Commission’s denial of Conditional Use Permit 2022-048 is scheduled for consideration by the City Council on June 18, 2024. Any action required by the City Council in relation to CCP 2023-007 will also be scheduled for consideration by the City Council on June 18, 2024.

Public Notice
Public notice of this appeal was mailed to all property owners within 300-feet of 1228 South Main, as well as to all interested parties. The public notice was posted on site at the proposed location (1228 South Main Street) and in City Hall and the Salinas Permit Center on May 21, 2024, and was published in the Monterey Herald on May 25, 2024.

CEQA CONSIDERATION:

Not a Project. The City of Salinas has determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378).

In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, Page | 9
this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Ordinance No. 2566 (N.C.S.) and Report to the City Council

2. Ordinance No. 2597 (N.C.S.) and Report to the City Council

3. Ordinance No. 2598 (N.C.S.) and Report to the City Council

4. Ordinance No. 2600 (N.C.S.) and Report to the City Council

5. December 15, 2021, Zoning Information Letter from Adam Garrett to Grant Palmer

6. April 17, 2024, Letter from Peter D. Brazil to Lisa Brinton re Conditional Use Permit CUP2022-048 Appeal of Planning Commission Decision.

7. May 21, 2024, Email from Trinh Retterer to Christopher Callihan re CCP2023-007 Amendment Appeal

8. Request for Amendment to Commercial Cannabis Permit (CCP) dated April 29, 2024 (with attachments)

9. May 7, 2024, Letter from City Attorney to Trinh Retterer re Commercial Cannabis Permit (CCP 2023-007) Major Amendment

10. May 15, 2024, Letter from City Attorney to Trinh Retterer and Peter D. Brazil re Commercial Cannabis Permit (CCP 2023-007) Major Amendment: Selection Committee Review; Notice of Denial

11. May 16, 2024, Email (with attached Development Review Application) from Trinh Retterer to City Attorney re CCP2023-007 Amendment Appeal
Cc: CannaCruz, Inc., Applicant
Trinh Retterer and Peter D. Brazil, JRG Attorneys at Law Samuel and Marguerite Kobrinsky, Trustees, Property Owner Other Interested Parties
1 UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
OF THE

SALINAS PLANNING COMMISSION
June 5, 2024
The meeting was called to order at 4:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber Rotunda.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

ROLL CALL

WELCOME AND STAFF INTRODUCTIONS
PRESENT: Chairperson Gonzalez and Commissioners Burrola, Manzo, McKelvey Daye, Meeks, Purnell, and Ramos
ABSENT: None
STAFF: City Attorney, Chris Callihan; Community Development Director, Lisa Brinton; Acting Police Chief, John Murray; Planning Manager, Courtney Grossman; Senior Planner, Thomas Wiles; and Administrative Aide, Maira Robles
Chairperson Gonzales introduced and welcomed Commissioner Tyler J. Burrola to the Salinas Planning Commission.

COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
Chairperson Gonzalez opened for public comment at 4:01 p.m.

No public comments were received.

Chairperson Gonzalez closed for public comment at 4:01 p.m.

CONSENT
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: May 1, 2024
Upon motion by Commissioner Meeks, and a second by Commissioner McKelvey Daye, the minutes of May 1, 2024, were approved. The motion carried by the following vote:

AYES: Chairperson Gonzalez and Commissioners Burrola, Manzo, McKelvey Daye, Meeks, Purnell, and Ramos
NOES: None
2 ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: May 29, 2024
Upon motion by Commissioner Manzo, and a second by Commissioner Meeks, the minutes of May 29, 2024, were approved. The motion carried by the following vote:

AYES: Chairperson Gonzalez and Commissioners Burrola, Manzo, McKelvey Daye, Meeks, Purnell, and Ramos
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None

PUBLIC HEARINGS
Commercial Cannabis Permit 2023-007; Appeal of Selection Committee Determination City Attorney, Chris Callihan, informed that the three Salinas Police Memorandums previously missing from the original agenda packet, are now attached and have been distributed by email and at the dais to the Salinas Planning Commission.

Mr. Callihan presented a PowerPoint presentation, which is on file at the Community Development Department.

Commissioner Burrola requested clarification from staff regarding the change of opinion as presented in the Police Department memorandums dated February 26, 2024, March 16, 2024, and March 19, 2024. Commissioner Burrola inquired if additional information had been presented to the Police Department to cause the change of opinion or if this had been an administrative error.

Acting Police Chief, John Murray, informed that an initial conversation occurred between he and Sergeant Magana prior to the release of the memorandum dated March 16, 2024. After a closer review of the site, Mr. Murray requested to withdraw the memorandum dated March 16, 2024, and presented the memorandum dated March 19, 2024.

Commissioner Manzo inquired if the Applicant, CannaCruz, Inc., was made aware at the time of submittal, that the project site is near two sensitive uses.

Mr. Callihan confirmed that that this information was relayed to the applicant in the Zoning Information Letter dated December 15, 2021.
3 Commissioner McKelvey Daye requested clarification regarding the items presented for consideration at this hearing and those presented for consideration on April 3, 2024.

Mr. Callihan informed that the Planning Commission denied Conditional Use Permit 2022-048 on April 3, 2024, and an appeal is scheduled for presentation to the City Council on June 18, 2024. The item presented today, is to consider the appeal of CannaCruz, Inc., from the Selection Committee's denial of the application for a Major Amendment to Commercial Cannabis Permit 2023-007 to relocate from 1156 Abbott Street to 1228 South Main Street.

Commissioner McKelvey Daye acknowledged the concerns with the proposed site and requested additional information of the concerns outlined in the Police Department memorandum.

Mr. Murray indicated concerns with the proposed relocation site due to the following: the site is adjacent to a residential area, it is in an area that is very busy with traffic because of the intersection with South Main Street, and Plaza Circle, and the driveway of the location is very narrow. Mr.

Murray indicated that there have been approximately 18 traffic collisions since 2021 at the intersection of South Main Street and Plaza Circle with one being a fatal traffic collision.

Commissioner Meeks inquired about the number and the nature of the crimes reported for the area.

Mr. Murray indicated that he did not have specific crime data, and informed that a significant number of calls for the area involve incidents at the bar located at Elli’s Great American Restaurant.

Additionally, Mr. Murray indicated that there have been several burglaries at Marijuana Dispensaries throughout Monterey County and in Salinas, and stated concerns as such crimes could create a situation which may result in a negative impact to the neighboring residential units.

Commissioner Meeks inquired about the traffic flow when vehicles exit the proposed site.

Mr. Murray indicated that vehicles exiting the site are permitted a right turn only.

Commissioner Ramos inquired about the previous use for the site and what the difference would be regarding the traffic impact consideration if a different type of business were to request to relocate to this site.

Mr. Murray indicated that the previous use of the site was a furniture store and his concern with the traffic impact is primarily due to the nature of the business and the potential trip count that may be generated by such business.

Commissioner Ramos inquired if there have been changes to the recommendation for denial made by the Selection Committee.

Mr. Callihan informed that the Selection Committee’s recommendation for denial is based on the site’s proximity to sensitive uses, the adjacent residential use, and that the City’s overall master planning perspective is that commercial cannabis businesses are best suited for industrial or commercial areas that are not in proximity to sensitive uses, including residential areas. 4 Commissioner Purnell inquired about the roles of the staff members appointed to the Selection Committee.

Mr. Callihan informed that the five staff appointed to the Selection Committee include the following:
an Associate Planner, an Economic Development Manager, a Police Sergeant, a staff member from Public Works, and a staff member from Library and Community Services.

Regarding the concern of the site’s proximity to other sensitive uses, Commissioner Purnell inquired what alternative mitigation could be offered should the Planning Commission decide to modify the Selection Committee’s recommendation for denial on said basis.

As an example, Mr. Callihan indicated that the Planning Commission could request that the applicant provide some screening or buffer to mitigate the impact of the project to the adjacent residential units.

Chairperson Gonzalez inquired about the specific information regarding staff’s concerns with the proximity of the site to the other sensitive uses, specifically the smoke shop and the bar.

Mr. Murray indicated that the police department frequently responds to bar fights and one of his concerns, is for intoxicated individuals to access the cannabis dispensary. Mr. Murray added that, although it is the intent of the Applicant that cannabis products will not be consumed on-site, there is potential for this to occur, and this would only add to existing traffic safety concerns.

Chairperson Gonzalez inquired if there are feasible structural changes that can be made should the Planning Commission direct staff to work with the applicant in mitigating the traffic impact of the project.

Mr. Callihan indicated that it may be difficult for staff to identify those changes at this time; however, if this is the direction of the Commission, staff may consider mitigations measures such as the addition of a stop sign or alternative roadway design measures to decrease and control traffic speed at the site.

Chairperson Gonzalez opened for a statement from the applicant at 4:26 p.m.

Peter Brazil, Applicant’s Attorney, provided public comment in support of the project and indicated the reasons for the applicant’s request to relocate to the proposed project site.

Chairperson Gonzalez opened for public comment at 4:36 p.m.

Brad Palmer, CannaCruz, Inc., Co-Owner, provided public comment in support of the project.

Coby Butler, CannaCruz, Inc., employee and Monterey County resident, provided public comment in support of the project.

Jorge Rubio, Sun Street Centers Employee, provided public comment in opposition of the project. 5 Julianna, Sun Street Centers Volunteer, provided public comment in opposition of the project.

Salinas resident (name not provided), provided public comment in opposition of the project.

Anahi Martinez, Salinas High School student, provided public comment in opposition of the project.

Ms. Martinez, Salinas resident, provided public comment in opposition of the project.

Cassandra, Salinas resident, provided public comment in opposition of the project.

Crystal, Salinas resident, provided public comment in opposition of the project.

Anthony, Salinas resident, provided public comment in opposition of the project.

Genesis Mojica, Youth Organizer, provided public comment in opposition of the project.

Saidee Santos, Salinas resident, provided public comment in opposition of the project.

Eloise Shim, Salinas resident, provided public comment in opposition of the project.

Ramon, Salinas resident, provided public comment in opposition of the project.

Christopher Bahn, Salinas resident, provided public comment in opposition of the project.

Salinas resident (name not provided), provided public comment in opposition of the project.

Aaron, Salinas resident, provided public comment in opposition of the project.

Salinas resident (name not provided), provided public comment in opposition of the project.

Jayden, Hartnell College student, provided public comment in opposition of the project.

Cesar, Salinas resident, provided public comment in opposition of the project.

Dallas, Marine Corps Veteran, provided public comment in opposition of the project.

Salinas resident (name not provided), provided public comment in opposition of the project.

Edgar, Salinas resident, provided public comment in opposition of the project.

Grant Palmer, CannaCruz, Inc., Co-Owner, provided public comment in support of the project.

Rose Clark, Salinas resident, provided public comment in opposition of the project.

Charlie Sammut, commercial property owner, provided public comment in opposition of the project. 6 Luis Gutierrez, Salinas resident, provided public comment in opposition of the project.

Chairperson Gonzalez closed for public comment at 5:07 p.m.

In addition to the public comments provided at the public hearing, three additional comment letters were received and made available to the Planning Commission. All public comments received during and after the public hearing, will become part of the record.

Commissioner Burrola inquired if the Community Development Director could provide a statement regarding the potential nuisances that could result due to the proposed relocation.

Community Development Director, Lisa Brinton, informed that she is not part of the Selection Committee, however, has read and understands the traffic and safety concerns presented by the Police Department staff and the concerns relating to the proximity of the project site to the adjacent residential units.

Mr. Callihan indicated that a public nuisance is only one of the potential findings that could be made as to whether the operation of a commercial cannabis business at this location would tend to cause a public nuisance or a situation which may result in repeated police department response or a negative impact on the adjacent residential uses.

Commissioner Burrola inquired if this is the first occurrence of a commercial business requesting to relocate.

Mr. Callihan confirmed that this is the first relocation request received from a commercial cannabis business in the City.

Commissioner Burrola inquired if the Planning Commission were to request recommendations from Staff regarding a modification to the determination made by the Selection Committee, would it be possible to receive it before the City Council hearing of June 18, 2024.

Mr. Callihan indicated that, should this be the Planning Commission’s request, a Special Meeting would be required for Staff to return with recommendations.

Commissioner Burrola inquired if both the Conditional Use Permit and the Commercial Cannabis Permit are required for operation of the Commercial Cannabis business.

Mr. Callihan confirmed that the applicant would need both the Conditional Use Permit and the Commercial Cannabis Permit approved to operate their business.

Commissioner Burrola inquired about the intent of the current code, specifically Article VII of Chapter 5 of the Salinas Municipal Code which indicates that commercial cannabis businesses should not be located in proximity to sensitive that commercial cannabis businesses are best suited for industrial or commercial areas. Mr. Burrola asked if it is fair to say that if changes to this specific code section are needed, it is best for the policy making body that is accountable to City voters, to make said changes.
7 Mr. Callihan acknowledged Commissioner Burrola’s statement.

Commissioner Manzo inquired about the security measures that the Applicant has established to prevent youth access to cannabis products.

Mr. Palmer indicated that there has never been an incident relating to cannabis sales to minors.

Additionally, Mr. Palmer stated that video and sale records are kept for a 90-day period and assured that identification cards are scrutinized to ensure validity.

Commissioner Manzo inquired about the number of vehicles per hour that are anticipated and what measures the applicant will take to ensure patrons are not utilizing neighboring commercial parking spaces.

Mr. Palmer indicated that a traffic study concluded that there is adequate parking at the proposed site and that as part of their application, there is a request to build a fence between the proposed site and the Elli’s Great American Restaurant parking area. Additionally, security will be onsite to enforce requirements and monitor vehicle activity.

Commissioner Manzo inquired about the businesses’ policy regarding the sale of cannabis products to intoxicated individuals.

Mr. Palmer indicated that his business observes a strict policy prohibiting the sell of products to intoxicated individuals and upholds the right to refuse service to anyone. He also stated that on-site consumption of cannabis products is not permissible.

Commissioner McKelvey Daye inquired about the traffic study.

Mr. Palmer indicated that the traffic study has been revised to allow for the consideration of an additional tenant at the proposed site.

Commissioner McKelvey Daye inquired from the Applicant about the weight that the current business location has on their incident free record.

Mr. Palmer indicated that although the current location is within an industrial zone, it is still accessible and yet, they have never experienced any of the nuisance concerns expressed by staff or the public at any of their three locations.

Commissioner Meeks inquired about the zoning for the other two commercial properties occupied by the applicant in both Watsonville and in Santa Cruz.

Mr. Palmer indicated he did not recall the zoning for the other two locations, but believed them to be in commercial zones.

Commissioner Ramos acknowledged both the assurances presented by the Applicant, and the concerns presented by staff and the public.
8 Commissioner Purnell inquired about the tax revenue amounts generated from the operation of Commercial Cannabis Permits.

Planning Manager, Courtney Grossman, indicated that he did not have revenue data on hand and added that revenue peaked in 2021 and has since been in a decline. Mr. Grossman added that commercial cannabis businesses are required to complete annual renewals.

Commercial Purnell inquired if staff is aware of current vacant sites that the Applicant may relocate to.

Mr. Grossman indicated that an analysis of vacant sites would be required to determine an alternate location, however, typically the responsibility of selecting a site falls on the applicants. Mr.

Grossman indicated that the City allows for a maximum of five Dispensary Permits for Commercial Cannabis businesses, and only three are currently operational.

Chairperson Gonzalez inquired about the storefront and advertisement visibility.

Mr. Palmer stated that the proposed business site would not be visible from S. Main Street. Mr.

Palmer added that CannaCruz, Inc., has paid over seven hundred thousand dollars in both taxes and fees in the past year.

Chairperson Gonzalez inquired if it is the City’s practice to assist in identifying alternate locations for the relocation of Commercial Cannabis businesses.

Mr. Grossman informed that the City and applicants utilize the GIS Mapping database as a tool to identify locations that meet the required regulations, however, data is not always up to date as there are frequent changes to the location of sensitive uses. Mr. Grossman added that although staff is available to assist, the responsibility of identifying an adequate location is that of the applicant.

Mr. Grossman requested to clarify tax revenue data previously provided and reported the following:
$1.8 million in 2020, $2 million in 2021, $1.5 million in 2022, and $1.074 in 2023.

Ms. Brinton indicated that staff’s role is to respond to zoning inquiries and provide zoning information letters informing of any restrictions that may exist for those sites.

Chairperson Gonzalez inquired from the Applicant about the number of customers per hour that are expected.

Mr. Palmer indicated he did not recall this data specifically, however, the completed traffic study estimated approximately four hundred to five hundred vehicles per day.

Commissioner Ramos inquired about the hours of operation for the proposed business. 9 Mr. Palmer indicated that the hours of operation are from 9 a.m. to 9 p.m., seven days per week. Mr.

Palmer added that although relocation of his business has been challenging due to the sensitive use requirements, he understands that this is his responsibility as the applicant.

Commissioner McKelvey Daye inquired about the repercussions to the Applicant if they fail to secure a relocation site.

Mr. Palmer indicated that they would go out of business and stated that the landlord at the current site has issued a thirty-day notice.

Commissioner McKelvey Daye inquired if the permits will be revoked once the applicant vacates their current location.

Mr. Callihan indicated that the permits would remain in good standing for the current location.

Commissioner McKelvey Daye indicated that there are various challenges with the City’s code as is, both for business owners who may need to relocate and for residents. She added that it is important to revisit the code and amend it if necessary as she anticipates there will be additional Commercial Cannabis business that will also have to relocate in the future.

Commissioner Manzo acknowledged the challenges in identifying alternate business locations due to existing regulations and sensitive use distance requirements, as well as the concerns presented by the public.

Commissioner Meeks expressed concerns with the proposed business location due to crime and the traffic impact and moved to neither affirm, reverse, or modify the Selection Committee’s determination and refer the Selection Committee’s determination and appeal thereof to the City Council for consideration.

Mr. Brazil requested an additional comment period to respond to outstanding inquires.

Chairperson acknowledged Mr. Brazil’s request and allowed for a two-minute comment period for responses from the applicant team.

Mr. Brazil indicated the following in support of the project and in response to the concerns expressed by the public: the requested relocation site is zoned as a commercial zone, not a residential zone, CannCruz, Inc., contributes significantly to tax revenue, the proposed location meets and exceeds the required distance from schools, and lastly, the proposed site would deter crime due to the narrowness of the existing driveway.

Chairperson Gonzalez returned to Commissioner Meeks for a motion.

Commissioner Meeks moved to neither affirm, reverse, or modify the Selection Committee’s determination and refer the Selection Committee’s determination and appeal thereof to the City Council for consideration. Commissioner Gonzalez seconded the motion. The motion carried by the following vote:
10 AYES: Chairperson Gonzalez and Commissioners Burrola, Manzo, McKelvey Daye, Meeks, Purnell, and Ramos
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None

OTHER BUSINESS
General Plan Steering Committee Update
Ms. Brinton informed that a public review draft will become available in late summer of 2024.

Commissioner Manzo inquired if the Planning Commission will have a study session for the public review draft of the General Plan.

Ms. Brinton informed that Staff will return to the Planning Commission on July 17, 2024, with a study session regarding the Environmental Justice and Public Safety Elements. At a later date, Staff will also present an Economic Development Update and Economic Development Strategic Plan, and the Environmental Impact Report. The final draft is expected to become available in the Fall of 2024.

FOLLOW-UP REPORTS
No follow-up reports were discussed.

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Mr. Grossman clarified that the study session regarding the Environmental Justice and Public Safety Elements is scheduled for presentation to the Planning Commission on July 3, 2024. On July 17, 2024, staff also expects to present the draft of the Alisal District Identity Master Plan and a Central Area Specific Plan, Tentative Map.

ADJOURNMENT
Chairperson Gonzalez reviewed for quorum for the May 15, 2024, meeting and adjourned at 5:48 p.m.
______________________ _______________________

ROSA GONZALEZ COURTNEY GROSSMAN
Chairperson Executive Secretary

June 4, 2024

Page 1 ends
← All documents from this meeting