Agenda packet — Mayor and City Council, June 17, 2026 (part 3 of 12)

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-070

A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA

AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING THE FINANCING TO

BE UNDERTAKEN BY THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL

FINANCE AUTHORITY FOR THE BENEFIT OF SAC
HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. IN AN AGGREGATE AMOUNT
NOT TO EXCEED $95,000,000 FOR THE PURPOSE OF

FINANCING A PORTION OF THE COSTS OF THE
ACQUISITION OF A BUILDING LOCATED AT 1003 E.

BRIER DRIVE IN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO,

CALIFORNIA, AND CERTAIN OTHER MATTERS
RELATING THERETO.

WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 5 of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California (the “Act”), certain public agencies (the “Members”) have entered into a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Relating to the California Municipal Finance Authority, dated as of January 1, 2004 (the “Agreement”) in order to form the California Municipal Finance Authority (the “Authority”), for the purpose of promoting economic, cultural and community development, and in order to exercise any powers common to the Members, including the issuance of bonds, notes or other evidences of indebtedness; and
WHEREAS, the City is a Member of the Authority in order to facilitate the promotion of economic, cultural and community development activities in the City, including the financing of projects therefor by the Authority; and
WHEREAS, the Authority is authorized to issue and sell revenue bonds for the purpose, among others, of financing or refinancing the construction of capital projects; and WHEREAS, the Section 4 of the Agreement requires the approval of the governing body of a Member for the issuance of bonds by the Authority with respect to any project located in the jurisdiction of such Member; and
WHEREAS, SAC Health System, Inc., a nonprofit public benefit corporation as described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Borrower”), has requested that the Authority issue and sell revenue bonds in the maximum principal amount of $95,000,000 (the “Bonds”) for the purpose of making a loan to the Borrower, to finance the acquisition, design, construction, renovation, and equipping of the building located at 1003 E. Brier Drive San Bernardino, California 92408, to include the building as part of the healthcare campus, and related capital improvement and equipment costs (the “Project”) owned and operated by the Borrower; and
Packet Page. 452
Resolution No. 2026-070
Resolution No. 2026-070
July 17, 2026

Page 2 of 5 ends

WHEREAS, pursuant to section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”), the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority must be approved by the “applicable elected representative” required to approve the issuance of Bonds under Section 147(f) of the Code; and WHEREAS, the Authority has requested that the Council approve the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority in order to satisfy the public approval requirement of section 147(f) of the Code and the requirements of Section 4 of the Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Project is located within the territorial limits of the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council is the elected legislative body of the City and is one of the “applicable elected representatives” required to approve the issuance of the Bonds under Section 147(f) of the Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to section 147(f) of the Code, following notice duly given a public hearing regarding the issuance of the Bonds was held and the Council now desires to approve the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority; and
WHEREAS, notice of such public hearing has been duly given as required by the Code, and such public hearing has been held at which all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard on all matters relative to the financing of the Project and the Authority’s issuance of the Bonds therefor; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest and for the public benefit that the Council approve the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority for the aforesaid purposes; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the City Council on June 17, 2026, at the Feldheym Central Library following a duly published notice thereof in a newspaper of general circulation in San Bernardino County, and all persons desiring to be heard have been heard; and WHEREAS, this Resolution is neither intended to nor shall it constitute an approval by the City Council of the San Bernardino Facility for any other purpose (including but not limited to compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act codified within the California Public Resources Code, Section 21100, et seq.).

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS SECTION 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporate herein by this reference.

SECTION 2. Approval. The City Council hereby approves the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority. It is the purpose and intent of the City Council that this resolution constitutes approval of the issuance of the Bonds (a) by the “applicable elected representative” of the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the area in which the Corporation’s facilities are located in accordance with section 147(f) of the Code and (b) by the Council in accordance with Section 4 of the Agreement.

Packet Page. 453
Resolution No. 2026-070
Resolution No. 2026-070
July 17, 2026

Page 3 of 5 ends

SECTION 3. Authority Responsibility. The issuance of the Bonds shall be subject to the approval of the Authority of all financing documents relating thereto to which the Authority is a party. The City shall have no responsibility or liability whatsoever with respect to the Bonds.

SECTION 4. City Officer Responsibility. The City’s officers are hereby authorized and directed (jointly and severally) to do any and all things; and to execute and deliver any and all documents which they deem necessary or advisable in order to carry out, give effect to, and comply with the terms and intent of this Resolution and the transaction approved.

SECTION 5. Adoption. The adoption of this Resolution shall not obligate the City or any department thereof to (i) provide any financing for the Project; (ii) approve any application or request for or take any other action in connection with any planning approval, permit or other action necessary for the acquisition, construction, rehabilitation or operation of the Project; (iii) make any contribution or advance any funds whatsoever to the Authority; or (iv) take any further action with respect to the Authority or its membership therein.

SECTION 6. City Clerk Responsibility. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed, jointly and severally, to do any and all things and to execute and deliver any and all documents which they deem necessary or advisable in order to carry out, give effect to and comply with the terms and intent of this resolution and the financing transaction approved hereby.

SECTION 7. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications; and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable.

SECTION 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately.

APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of San Bernardino California and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk this 17hday of June 2026.

Helen Tran, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Packet Page. 454
Resolution No. 2026-070
Resolution No. 2026-070
July 17, 2026

Page 4 of 5 ends

Attest:

Telicia Lopez, CMC, City Clerk
Approved as to form:

Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney
Packet Page. 455
Resolution No. 2026-070
Resolution No. 2026-070
July 17, 2026

Page 5 of 5 ends

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
I, Telicia Lopez , CMC, City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. 2026-070, adopted at a regular meeting held on the 17th day of June, 2026 by the following vote:

Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______
IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______
FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______
SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______
KNAUS _____ _____ _______ _______
FLORES _____ _____ _______ _______
ORTIZ _____ _____ _______ _______
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this 18 th day of June
2026.
____________________________
Telicia Lopez, CMC, City Clerk
Packet Page. 456
Packet Page. 457
Packet Page. 458

PUBLIC HEARING
City of San Bernardino
Request for Council Action
Date: June 17, 2026
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Tarik Rahmani, Director of Finance & Management Services Department: Finance & Management Services Department
Subject: City Manager’s Proposed Fiscal Year 2026/27 Operating Budget & FY 2027-2031 Capital Improvement Program (All
Wards)
Recommendation:

It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino:

1. Conduct the Public Hearing on the Proposed Fiscal Year 2026/27 Operating Budget and 2027-2031 Capital Improvement Plan; and

2. Adopt Resolution No. 2026-071 approving the City of San Bernardino’s Fiscal Year 2026/27 Operating Budget and 2027-2031 Capital Improvement Program; and

3. Adopt Resolution No. 2026-072 establishing the City’s Appropriations Limit as required by Article XIIIB of the California State Constitution; and

4. Adopt Resolution No. 2026-073 approving the updated Investment Policy for FY 2026/27; and

5. Approve any modifications made during the Public Hearing to be incorporated into the City of San Bernardino’s Fiscal Year 2026/27 Operating Budget and 2027-2031 Capital Improvement Program and included as part of the adopted budgets.

City Manager's Comments

Packet Page. 459
The City Manager recommends the proposed FY 2026/27 Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Program. Based on the discussion at the City Council study session on the budget, the proposed Capital projects has been revised to add back the projects that were recommended for deferral. In addition, the City Council requested that the City Manager look at the $3 million requested by public speakers for the Arts.

The City Manager reviewed the matter and is proposing the following for City Council consideration. (1) That the City Council appropriate $1 million from the Cultural Development Fund fund balance be appropriated in the General Fund budget specifically for the Arts. The City Council consider at a future meeting to create a Arts & Culture Committee to be staffed by the City Manager’s Office to recommend projects.

One consideration in doing this would be to create two separate Committees and have a dedicated Historic Preservation Committee and a dedicated Arts & Culture Committee. (3) Finally, the City Manager recommends he look at events for the coming year and see if there can be an Arts & Culture specific event.

Executive Summary
The FY 2026/27 Proposed Operating Budget and FY 2027-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) have been prepared in accordance with the City Charter and reflect the City’s commitment to maintain essential services, advancing strategic priorities, and preserving long-term fiscal sustainability amid a moderating economic environment.

The proposed budget totals $318.2 million in revenues and $328.5 million in expenditures across all funds, including $9.9 million in new CIP appropriations. The General Fund remains financially stable with projected spendable reserves of approximately $104.9 million, exceeding the City’s reserve policy requirements.

However, the budget continues to reflect structural challenges driven by slowing revenue growth, increasing personnel and operational costs, and the City’s reliance on economically sensitive revenue sources such as Sales and Use Tax and Measure S.

The proposed budget incorporates conservative revenue projections across all funds, target expenditure reductions, and continued investment in critical infrastructure and community priorities. Adoption of the budget and CIP will provide the financial framework necessary to support City operations, deliver services, and advance the City Council’s goals.

While reserves remain strong, recurring expenditure growth continues to outpace recurring revenue growth, creating a structural imbalance that must be addressed over time.

Background
Section 701 of the City Charter provides that, at least sixty (60) days prior to the beginning of each fiscal year, the City Manager shall prepare and submit to the Mayor and Council a proposed budget and accompanying budget message explaining the City’s financial plan, work programs, organizational goals, community priorities, and proposed financial policies for the ensuing fiscal year. Section 702 further requires the City Manager to prepare and submit a multi-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which is to be revised and extended annually for projects pending or under construction Packet Page. 460
or acquisition. Article VII, Section 703, states that the Council shall publish a general summary of the budget and CIP and hold one (1) or more public hearings. Following the public hearing(s), the budget and CIP shall be adopted, with any amendments deemed appropriate by the Council, before the beginning of each fiscal year.

On March 18, 2026, the Mayor and City Council received and filed the Fiscal Year 2025/26 Mid-Year Financial Update and adopted Resolution 2026-031 authorizing a budget amendment of $1,085,904 to the FY 2025/26 Operating Budget. The mid-year report projected year-end General Fund revenues of approximately $222.1 million and Packet Page. 461
an estimated year-end fund balance of approximately $153.3 million, inclusive of $113.3 million in spendable reserves. The revenue and expenditure conditions identified in the mid-year report, including slowed activity in Sales & Use Tax, Measure S, and Utility Users Tax, informed the revenue assumptions and expenditure framework underlying the proposed FY 2026/27 Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Program.

The development of the FY 2026/27 Operating and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget began in late 2025, at which time staff identified an initial General Fund funding gap between projected revenues and expenditures. During the FY 2026/27 Operating and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget Kickoff, the City Manager directed departments to prepare budget proposals that included up to a 5% reduction from their current appropriations. This approach was intended to help address ongoing revenue constraints and support the City’s efforts to achieve a balanced budget.

Departments were given flexibility in how to meet the reduction target, including holding positions vacant or reducing operational expenditures. While the full 5% reduction may not ultimately be necessary, the exercise provided a framework for identifying potential cost-saving measures and prioritizing essential services. Several key considerations occurring in FY 2025/26 influence the development of the proposed budget as city operations continue, evolve, and change, as does the external economic landscape at the National, State, and County level.

On April 29, 2026, the Mayor and City Council held a Special Meeting Budget Workshop to review the Proposed FY 2026/27 Operating and CIP Budget. The Budget Book and Budget in Brief were also made available online, in both English and Spanish, on the City’s website at https://www.sanbernardino.gov/195/Budget-Books. The proposed FY 2026/27 budget presented to the Mayor and City Council totaled $318.2 million in revenues and $333.4 million in expenditures, including $14.9 million for Capital Improvement Projects. To help balance the budget, $15.0 million in CIP projects was proposed for adjustment, with $8.8 million reallocated to more appropriate special revenue funds and $6.3 million proposed for deferral into FY 2026/27. The Mayor and City Council directed staff to return the deferred Capital Improvement Projects for further consideration at the Budget Hearing.

Discussion
The FY 2026/27 Proposed Budget is developed within a moderating economic environment marked by slowing growth, softening consumer activity, and evolving revenue performance across key categories. While some revenue streams continue to demonstrate resilience, other revenue streams, particularly those tied to consumer spending and development activity, are showing signs of deceleration. As a result, it is critical to evaluate broader national, state, and regional economic conditions to inform revenue assumptions and guide prudent financial planning for the upcoming fiscal year.

Economic Indicators
U.S. Real GDP Growth
Packet Page. 462
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is one of the broadest measures of a country’s economic activity since it estimates the total value of goods and services produced within a country over a specific period. According to the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Real GDP contracted 0.6% in Q1 2025 before rebounding through mid-year, then decelerated sharply to 0.5% in Q4 2025 and 1.6% in Q1 2026. Personal Consumption Expenditures with GDP is the most relevant factor to municipal revenue forecasting since it is the primary driver of taxable retail activity; this category followed a similar pattern of sharp declines and then a slight increase. It peaked at 3.5% in Q3 2025 before declining to 1.9% in Q4 2025 and 1.4% in Q1 2026. The GDP pictured below shows that the U.S. economy is still moving forward, but not in a smooth manner.

Businesses are investing and expanding, especially in technology and equipment, which has helped keep the economic growth positive. Meanwhile, households are becoming more careful with their spending, the housing market remains weak, and inflation is putting pressure on family budgets. Therefore, economic growth is occurring but not every sector that contributes to GDP is benefitting or contributing equally. Much of the recent growth is being supported by business investment, exports, and government spending rather than consumer spending. In the City of San Bernardino, the residents likely feel the effects of higher prices and housing costs even though at the national level, the economy appears to be slowly growing.

California and Regional Labor Market Conditions
A healthy job market means more people are working, earning, and spending, which for the City of San Bernardino would translate directly into sales tax revenue. By that measure, California and the Inland Empire are holding steady, but not growing. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that California’s unemployment rate has remained between 5.3% and 5.5% since November 2025. Locally, the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario region reported an unemployment rate of 4.9% in April 2026, with Packet Page. 463
essentially no net job growth over the prior year (extracted on June 4, 2026). The sectors growing locally, primarily healthcare and education, contribute to the regional economy, but they do not generate the volume of taxable transactions that fund City services. Sales tax is collected on goods and services purchased at stores, dealerships, restaurants, and job sites. The industries shrinking in our region are precisely those that drive that activity. Construction is down 4.0%, manufacturing down

4.2%, and professional and business services down 3.5% compared to the prior year.

When the industries that buy equipment, materials, and commercial services are contracting, the City feels it directly in its revenue. A regional job market that is flat overall, and declining in its most commercially active sectors, means the City must remain conservative in its revenue projections to respond to these patterns seen.

Fuel Prices & Revenue Volatility
Fuel prices represent one of the most visible and immediate economic forces affecting both the City’s revenue and its costs. Fuel prices increased significantly during FY 2025/26 due to a combination of global market conditions, refinery capacity constraints, regulatory requirements, and geopolitical uncertainty combined with the closure of two major California refineries – Phillips 66 & Valero’s Benicia – along with CARB regulations are contributing to the risk of prices continuing to rise in FY 2026/27. For the City, this means that when the gas prices go up, the City collects more in fuelrelated sales tax, simply because the taxable value of every gallon sold is higher. But, high gas prices also means that the City also has higher fuel expenses for its own fleet like police vehicles, public works trucks, and other essential equipment. An increase in revenue also comes with increased expenses. More broadly, when residents need to spend more at the pump, they have less to spend elsewhere such as restaurants, retailers, and car dealerships. These businesses generate the bulk of the City’s sales tax revenues, meaning that high fuel prices leave little room for broad-based sales tax growth in the year ahead.

California Sales Tax Trends & City of San Bernardino Performance After two consecutive years of decline, California’s sales tax revenues are showing signs of modest recovery. In HdL Companies’ March 2026 California Forecast, statewide sales tax revenues are projected to grow 1.8% in FY 2025/26 and 2.2% in FY 2026/27. While statewide growth is positive, the projections come with significant uncertainty, driven by tariff-related price changes, elevated fuel costs, and cautious consumer behavior that shows no signs of reversing in the near term. Locally, the City’s sales and use tax receipts for October through December 2025 were 8.5% higher than the same period the prior year. However, this increase was largely the result of a onetime recovery of taxes that had been missing from prior periods; this activity is not a reflection of stronger retail activity in the community. When those one-time adjustments are removed, underlying taxable sales in San Bernardino declined 6.9% compared to the same quarter in 2024. During that same period, San Bernardino County as a whole grew 5.9% meaning that the numbers the City is seeing are not keeping pace with its own region. Several factors are driving this gap – new competition from businesses outside the City limits continues to pull retail spending away from San Bernardino.

Online shopping is capturing a growing share of consumer dollars that once stayed Packet Page. 464
local, the loss of taxes from the prior closure of an outlet in the business and industry group, and key revenue categories such as general consumer goods and business-tobusiness sales posted notable declines this quarter.

California State Budget (Structural Deficit)
California continues to face significant long-term fiscal challenges despite recent improvements in near-term revenue projections. In January 2026, the Summary of the Governor’s Proposed 2026-27 Budget proposed a $348.9 billion State budget projecting an estimated $2.9 billion deficit for FY 2026/27, substantially lower than prior projections of approximately $18 billion due to stronger-than-anticipated tax collections, resilient financial markets, and improved revenue assumptions. However, despite the improved short-term outlook, the State’s broader fiscal condition remains structurally imbalanced. According to the California Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO), California is projected to continue facing ongoing structural deficits ranging between approximately $20 billion and $30 billion annually throughout the remainder of the decade, with some forecasts projecting annual shortfalls approaching $35 billion in future years. The LAO has noted that recent revenue gains have been heavily influenced by strong financial market performance and technology-sector related investment activity, both of which remain highly volatile and susceptible to economic downturns. The State’s fiscal condition remains particularly relevant to local governments, as structural imbalances at the State level may create additional risks for cities through reduced funding flexibility, delayed program reimbursements, shifts in fiscal responsibility, or future reductions in State-supported programs. Similar to many jurisdictions throughout California, the City continues to experience budgetary pressure associated with inflation, rising operational costs, labor expenditures, and slowing revenue growth. Accordingly, the City continues to prioritize conservative revenue forecasting, prudent expenditure management, and long-term financial sustainability in response to ongoing economic uncertainty at both the State and national levels.

FY 2026/27 Proposed Budget Overview
The City Manager’s Proposed Operating and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for the Fiscal Year 2026/27 for the City of San Bernardino totals $318.2 million in total revenues and $328.5 million in total expenditures. Of these expenditures, $9.9 million is newly requested funding for the Capital Improvement Program. The total budget reflects the City’s total financial plan across all fund types. These fund types can be categorized into five major fund categories: General Fund, Special Revenues Funds, Capital Project Funds (also known as Development Impact Fees), Enterprise Funds, and Internal Service Funds.

Packet Page. 465
An important distinction for these numbers is that some of the City’s funds are legally restricted: the dollars collected in certain fund types can only be spent on specific, designated purposes. Capital Project Funds, for example, are used exclusively for infrastructure and facility improvements; Enterprise Funds support the City’s integrated waste management operations; Internal Service Funds cover costs shared across City departments such as general liability, workers compensation, fleet operations, and information technology. Special Revenue Funds account for programs and services supported by dedicated revenue sources. The largest portion of the budget, General Fund, is the most significant fund type that supports the day-to-day operations and the delivery of core community services including public safety, parks, libraries, operations and maintenance. It is also the fund over which the City has the greatest discretion in how resources are allocated. The General Fund also provides financial support to special revenue funds whose own-source revenues are insufficient to fully cover their operational costs. In FY 2026/27, the General Fund includes a transfer of $7.6 million to the Animal Services Fund indicating a recurring General Fund obligation that reduce the dollars available for other City services.

FY 2026/27 General Fund Revenues
Fund Type Budgeted Revenues Budgeted Expenditures
Capital Project Funds 5,985,000$ 4,250,000$
Enterprise Funds 500,000$ 1,366,783$
General Fund 233,826,392$ 251,084,665$
Internal Service Funds 40,982,753$ 40,935,536$
Special Revenue 36,885,126$ 30,826,140$
Grand Total 318,179,271$ 328,463,124$
Packet Page. 466
Of the $233.8 million in budgeted General Fund revenues, Sales & Use Tax and Measure S are 44% of the total and Utility User Tax is the second largest category at 14%. The City is highly dependent on a single source of revenue that is volatile; the City’s financial condition is directly and immediately sensitive to changes in consumer spending and retail activity and is seen in the same fiscal year the slowdown occurs.

Sales and Use Tax & Measure S projected revenues for FY 2026/27 are reflected to decrease by $1.0 million combined, or -2%, as compared to the FY 2025/26 adopted budget. These projections are in line with the data available and trends seen locally:
consumer spending is cautious, regional retail is flat, and the City is underperforming the county. The revenue sources cannot be assumed to grow in the current environment, and staff recommends continuing to use a conservative projection for the time being.

Utility User Tax is projected to increase modestly by approximately $317k, or 1%, from the FY 2025/26 adopted budget. With energy costs rising driven by the Middle East conflict, and the closing of California refineries, higher utility costs may result in modest increases in Utility Users Tax revenues; however, these same increases create additional financial pressure on residents and businesses.

Licenses & Permits are projected to decrease in FY 2026/27 by $1.0 million, or -7%, due to slower development and a direct reflection of the labor market indications that show the construction sector employment is down by 4% regionally. With fewer construction projects occurring, less permits are pulled meaning the City may expect to see a decrease in these revenues.

Fines and Forfeitures & Intergovernmental are projected to increase by $3.3 million combined in FY 2026/27. The activity seen in both these revenue categories within FY 2025/26 due to parking enforcement fees and code administrative citations have been Revenue Category FY 2023/24
Actuals
FY 2024/25
Actuals
FY 2025/26
Adopted
FY 2025/26
Projected
Year-End Total
FY 2026/27
Proposed
Charges for services 6,829,807$ 6,184,405$ 5,822,130$ 6,728,670$ 6,113,237$ Fines and forfeitures 766,079$ 1,211,377$ 891,000$ 2,145,409$ 2,655,180$ Franchise Tax 14,328,378$ 13,908,285$ 14,560,000$ 14,546,664$ 13,963,040$ Intergovernmental 6,753,174$ 5,602,977$ 5,018,400$ 6,056,240$ 6,523,920$ Investment income 3,373,049$ 3,166,512$ 1,050,000$ 3,716,834$ 1,155,000$ Licenses & permits 16,059,891$ 14,575,494$ 14,287,000$ 14,171,910$ 13,286,910$ Measure S Sales Tax 51,214,630$ 51,617,498$ 52,040,000$ 51,821,000$ 51,540,000$ Miscellaneous 7,737,893$ 4,980,145$ 7,411,797$ 3,983,285$ 7,857,645$ Other Taxes 12,409,515$ 11,601,877$ 11,780,000$ 11,222,569$ 12,854,600$ Property Taxes in Lieu of VLF 23,604,046$ 25,443,736$ 25,149,250$ 25,198,138$ 28,418,653$ Sales and Use Tax 55,612,168$ 52,367,619$ 52,058,494$ 50,535,897$ 51,558,494$ Taxes 5,439$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Use of Money and Property 5,273,844$ 6,184,183$ 6,383,760$ 4,282,347$ 5,841,324$ Utility Users Tax 28,671,310$ 29,146,952$ 31,740,980$ 27,650,246$ 32,058,390$ General Fund Revenue Total 232,639,223$ 225,991,060$ 228,192,811$ 222,059,209$ 233,826,392$ Packet Page. 467
elevated and staff expects these revenue levels to sustain given the current operations in place.

General Fund Structural Gap
The FY 2026/27 Proposed Budget reflects an operational gap between General Fund revenues and expenditures. This gap reflects the cumulative pressure of a revenue base that has not kept pace with the cost of delivering services to a growing and evolving community.

The budget as originally proposed in the April 29, 2026, Budget Workshop included a plan to address this gap in part through the deferral of approximately $15 million in Capital Improvement Projects previously budgeted in the General Fund. Of that amount, $8 million was identified for transfer to more appropriate funding sources, with the remainder proposed for deferral into FY 2027/28. While these recommendations would have contributed toward closing the budget gap, they were also intended to align the Capital Improvement Program with current organizational capacity. The Engineering and Project Management teams are actively advancing an ambitious portfolio of projects that were programmed in prior years and are currently in various stages of design and construction. Deferring select projects would allow the City to focus available staff and resources, both financial and operational, on successfully delivering the significant work already underway, ensuring projects are completed as effectively, efficiently, and expeditiously as possible while maximizing the value of existing investments. Additionally, approximately $1.9 million in supplemental funding was added in FY 2026/27 to the City Hall project within General Fund in response to direction received from Mayor and City Council at the budget workshop.

At the direction of Mayor and City Council, the deferred Capital Improvement Projects are being returned for further consideration at the Budget Hearing. As a result, the operational gap remains an active item before the Council. The City’s ability to close this gap, and to build toward long-term structural balance, depends on two things working together: disciplined expenditure management and a deliberate, sustained effort to diversify and grow the City’s revenue base beyond its current dependence on sales tax.

FY 2026/27 General Fund Expenditures
The FY 2026/27 Proposed Budget reflects total General Fund Expenditures of $251.1 million, an increase of $6.4 million, or 2% from the FY 2025/26 Adopted Budget. While the overall change appears modest, the composition of that change shows a more nuanced story about the various cost pressures the City is managing. Visually shown below is also the percentage composition of the departments within the General Fund, the largest being Police Department at 60% of the total General Fund budget.

Packet Page. 468
Personnel Costs remains the single largest category in the General Fund, totaling $160.4 million in FY 2026/27. This represents 64% of the total General Fund expenditure budget, and $16.6 million increase, or 12% from the FY 2025/26 adopted budget. Primary cost drivers within this category are full-time salaries, insurance costs, and CalPERS Unfunded Liability. Full-time salaries increased by 9% reflecting negotiated compensation adjustments across bargaining units, as well as merit increases for those subject to receiving them. Insurance premiums are also rising, which reflects a 12% increase in the personnel costs, and lastly the CalPERS unfunded liability increased by 7% from the prior fiscal year, totaling $41.9 million. However, these increases also reflect the impact of the addition of 343 full-time positions to the City in the span of five (5) fiscal years: FY 2020/21 through FY 2025/26. The most significant growth occurred in FY 2021/22 through FY 2023/24 when the organization added 240 full-time positions through various initiatives. Position additions of this magnitude, in a short span of time, in a City that is dependent on volatile revenue sources, and lacks a steady revenue source such as Property Tax, creates significant operational pressure to support personnel costs but lessens the resources available for operational costs.

Maintenance and Operations expenditures in FY 2026/27 total $41.6 million, which is a 3% increase from the FY 2025/26 adopted budget. The majority of the line items within this category encompass a standard 3% inflationary adjustments with materials and supplies increasing by about 12% overall and outside legal services increasing by about 6%. These increases reflect the broader inflationary pressures on good, services, commodities, and the management of an active litigation environment.

Operating Expenses encompass the internal service charges throughout the City for Packet Page. 469
the Liability, Workers Compensation, Information Technology, and Fleet Funds. These expenses in FY 2026/27 total $45.5 million within General Fund, which is an 18% increase from the FY 2025/26 adopted budget. The primary increase for these charges are related the Fleet Service Charges due to rising maintenance costs, fuel costs, and increasing cost of the fleet lease model contract.

Capital Improvement Projects in the Proposed Budget encompass any new funding allocations in the General Fund for existing projects that require additional resources.

The budget allocation currently reflects $1.9 million specifically assigned to the City Hall Feasibility Study aligning with the Mayor and City Council’s direction during the April 29, 2026 Budget Workshop to continue forward with the City Hall project. The project currently has a budget allocation within General Fund in FY 2025/26 of $248k, the additional budget allocation in FY 2026/27 would bring the total project budget to $2.2 million which was previously identified by the engineering team to be the funding needing to complete the study.

Departmental Budget Reductions are included in the FY 2026/27 Proposed Budget to assist in working towards a reduced structural gap in the General Fund. Below are the items included in department budgets as reductions. These were submitted by the department, reviewed and approved by the City Manager after deeming the reductions to not impact core services the City provides to the community of San Bernardino. ❖ General Government’s budget is reduced by approximately $2.9 million due to the closure of a distribution center in 2025, which ended a sales tax sharing agreement, and reduced General Fund support for Animal Services following renegotiated partner cost-sharing agreements.
❖ City Manager’s Office budget is reduced by approximately $220k due to the department holding the Assistant City Manager position vacant for 8 months. ❖ The Finance Department’s budget is reduced by $194k due to the department holding a Grants Assistant position vacant for 12 months, a DBE Specialist vacant for six months, and an overall reduction in contractual services. ❖ Economic Development’s budget is reduced by approximately $198k due to the department holding a Senior Economic Development Manager vacant for 12 months.
❖ The Community Development & Housing Department’s budget is reduced by approximately $1.8 million. This reduction is primarily due to holding the following positions vacant for 12 months: one Assistant Planner (FLEX), one Community Development Technician, and one Ombudsperson. In addition, the Navigation Center operations budget has been revised from $2.0 million in originally programmed General Fund support, with $1.0 million now funded through the Opioid Fund. These operating costs are intended to be partially supported by the Opioid Fund for one year, after which staff will evaluate alternative funding sources during future budget development cycles. The department has also reduced $386k in contractual services. ❖ The Police Department’s budget is reduced by approximately $5.8 million which consists of $4.4 million in proposed salary savings and $1.4 million in motor vehicles.

Packet Page. 470
❖ The Parks & Recreation Department’s budget is reduced by $117k due to the department holding a Community Recreation Program Supervisor vacant for 12 months.
❖ The Public Works Department’s budget is reduced by approximately $1.3 million, primarily due to anticipated salary savings. The Engineering team that supports Capital Improvement Projects (CIPs) is budgeted in the General Fund; however, as staff actively work on projects, their time is charged to those projects. This results in a natural reduction in General Fund expenditures, as actual staff costs are recovered through project billing and allocated as overhead to the appropriate projects.
❖ The Library Department’s budget is reduced by approximately $265k primarily due to the department holding a Library Technician I (FLEX) position vacant for 12 months and reduced contractual services.

Department Budget Increases are included within General Fund and are minimal.

Below are items included in the FY 2026/27 Proposed Budget:
❖ The Police Department has an increase of approximately $350k due to ongoing contractual obligations that were previously funded by ARPA. ❖ The Parks & Recreation department has an increase of approximately $229k primarily due to increased funding for Special Events and pool maintenance contracts to continue allowing for year-round programming. ❖ The City Clerk, Public Works and Legal Services Department had increases tied to CPI increases in contractual obligations. Across the three departments, the budget increases total $249k.
❖ The Economic Development Department had a $74k increase due to contractual obligations for increased real estate services.

FY 2026/27 Projected Fund Balance
Fund Balance represents the accumulated financial resources available to the City, calculated as the difference between what the City collects over time versus what it’s spent. Fund Balance serves as a financial cushion to provide stability during periods of economic downturns and provides the City with saved resources to respond to unexpected needs without disrupting core services.

Category
FY 2021/22
Actuals
(audited)
FY 2022/23
Actuals
(audited)
FY 2023/24
Actuals
(audited)
FY 2024/25
Actuals
(audited)
FY 2025/26
Year-End
Estimated
FY 2026/27
Projected
Adopted
Beginning Fund Balance, as of June 30th 110,742,632$ 156,449,095$ 173,462,555$ 202,925,562$ 178,515,774$ 153,260,986$ Revenues 208,775,374$ 221,320,505$ 233,643,492$ 228,011,214$ 222,059,209$ 233,826,392$ Expenditures (Operating Only) (157,177,194)$ (190,984,572)$ (196,185,240)$ (239,687,480)$ (234,229,923)$ (249,133,197)$ Expenditures (CIP Only) (5,891,717)$ (13,322,473)$ (7,995,245)$ (12,733,522)$ (13,084,074)$ (1,951,468)$ CIP Project Deferral to Other Funding Source -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,849,187$ Net Surplus/Deficit - (Use of Fund Balance) 45,706,463$ 17,013,460$ 29,463,007$ (24,409,788)$ (25,254,788)$ (8,409,086)$ CIP Fund Balance Use 13,084,074$ 1,951,468$
Operations Fund Balance Use 5,553,929$ 6,457,618$
Carryovers from FY 24/25 Fund Balance Use 6,616,785$
Fund Balance 156,449,095$ 173,462,555$ 202,925,562$ 178,515,774$ 153,260,986$ 144,851,899$ Less: Nonspendable 40,204,687$ 41,421,536$ 40,806,497$ 39,593,408$ 40,000,000$ 40,000,000$ Ending Fund Balance 116,244,408$ 132,041,019$ 162,119,065$ 138,922,366$ 113,260,986$ 104,851,899$

CALCULATION OF FUND BALANCE
Packet Page. 471
The City’s projected General Fund balance at the close of FY 2026/27 is estimated to be $144.8 million, $40.0 million of it being nonspendable, meaning the actual spendable fund balance is projected to be $104.9 million. The projected fund balance also complies with the Council-adopted General Fund Reserve Policy of 25% total budgeted expenditures: 15% Emergency Reserve and 10% Economic Contingency Reserve. Together, these two reserves total $62.8 million reflecting the disciplined financial stewardship exercised over multiple budget cycles.

However, the cumulative four-year trend shows that while the City meets its reserve policy entering FY 2026/27, the net fund balance overall has declined approximately $27 million since FY 2022/23, with the high point in recent years. The decline has two distinct origins:
❖ The first dynamic is the intentional use of fund balance to support capital improvement projects. This reserve accumulated since the adoption of Measure S and use of this reserve is a legitimate and planned use of reserves that reflect the City’s investment in infrastructure and facilities. Capital fund balances drawdown, while still impacting overall fund balance, represent deliberate decisions made in the context of the broader investment strategy for the City’s parks, facilities, streets, etc.
❖ The second dynamic is unplanned use of fund balance. In FY 2024/25, the General Fund revenues fell short of what was needed to fully cover the operational expenditures.

The FY 2026/27 budget reflects a projected operational deficit of approximately $8.4 million, partially offset by $8.8 million in Capital Improvement Projects being transferred to more appropriate funding sources and that budget then reverting back into fund balance. The net draw on fund balance is manageable in the context of current reserves and the City remains in compliance with its reserve policy. The trend line for future years remains clear though: the single largest expenditure pressure in General Fund, personnel costs, continue growing approximately 12% annually while the City’s largest and most critical revenue source isn’t keeping pace and is estimated to grow modestly but is subject to global, state and local economic changes. If the gap between rising costs and modest revenue growth persists, the City’s fund balance will ACFR 2021-22 ACFR 2022-23 ACFR 2023-24 ACFR 2024-25
Category

FUND BALANCE
06-30-2022

FUND BALANCE
06-30-2023

FUND BALANCE
06-30-2024

FUND BALANCE
06-30-2025

FUND BALANCE
06-30-2026
(estimated)

FUND BALANCE
06-30-2027
(estimated)
Nonspendable 40,204,687 41,421,536 40,806,497 39,593,408 40,000,000 40,000,000 Restricted 2,107,208 2,086,366 2,099,574 2,164,740 1,800,000 1,800,000 Committed
Animal Services 68,387 68,387 - - - -
General Plan Update 55,048 142,877 551,312 471,515 600,000 600,000 Measure S - Capital Projects 57,201,940 81,762,949 86,734,706 68,201,640 46,480,551 39,680,733 15% Emergency Reserve 28,130,824 28,788,264 35,618,054 38,628,262 38,628,261 37,662,700 10% Economic Contingency Reserve 18,753,883 19,192,176 23,745,369 25,752,175 25,752,174 25,108,466 Assigned 6,669,342 - 13,370,050 3,704,034 - -
Unassigned 3,257,776 - - - - -
TOTAL FUND BALANCE 156,449,095 173,462,555 202,925,562 178,515,774 153,260,986 144,851,899 Less: Nonspendable 40,204,687 41,421,536 40,806,497 39,593,408 40,000,000 40,000,000 NET FUND BALANCE 116,244,408 132,041,019 162,119,065 138,922,366 113,260,986 104,851,899

FUND BALANCE DESIGNATION
Packet Page. 472
continue to absorb the difference. The FY 2026/27 Proposed Budget has been built on a foundation of conservative revenue assumptions and deliberate expenditure management reflecting a responsible budget during a challenging economic environment. The City’s long-term fiscal health depends on thoughtful management of our resources and focusing on prioritization in each year, ensuring optimization of all available resources, and the need to grow and diversify the revenue base within the City.

Capital Improvement Program FY 2027-2031
The City’s capital improvement program is a testament to the sustained investment San Bernardino has made in its future. Across all funds, the City maintains an amended capital budget of approximately $196.0 million in FY 2025/26, including $54.6 million in General Fund capital. Of that, Measure S portfolio alone accounts for nearly $51.7 million. Approximately $163.9 million in prior-year appropriations are expected to carry forward into FY 2026/27, with an additional $9.9 million in proposed new appropriations to continue supporting ongoing projects. This portfolio also reflects approximately $8.8 million in General Fund project budget reallocations to more appropriate funding sources, ensuring the program is aligned with current capacity and funding strategy.

Together, this results in a CIP portfolio of approximately $165 million entering FY 2026/27. These figures represent more than funding – they are real commitments to the neighborhoods, streets, and facilities that shape daily life for our residents. Active capital priorities span the full breadth of community investment, from street rehabilitation and park improvements to the Navigation Center, a transformational project funded through ARPA and other dedicated funding sources that reflects the City’s commitment to addressing homelessness with lasting, meaningful solutions.

Delivering on commitments of this scale requires disciplined management of capacity alongside funding. The City’s engineering and project management team is actively advancing an ambitious portfolio of projects, doing so with the focus and precision that complex capital delivery demands. With $163.9 million in active appropriations already in motion across the organization, the priority this fiscal year is to advance the work already underway and deliver it to the community as effectively and efficiently as possible.

FY 2026/27 Appropriations Limit Calculation
Article XIIIB of the California Constitution, introduced by Proposition 4 in 1979 and later amended by Proposition 111 in 1990, imposes limits on the growth rate of appropriations for cities and other local governments. This growth rate is based on changes in population and California's Per Capita Personal Income. In May 2026, the California Department of Finance provided cities with updated factors for population change and Per Capita Personal Income to use in calculating their appropriation limits.

For Fiscal Year 2026-27, the change in the California Per Capita Personal Income is

4.95% and the change in San Bernardino's population is -0.06%. Based on this data, San Bernardino's appropriation limit for FY 2026-27 is calculated at $545,191,566. The total appropriations subject to limitation in the City’s FY 2026-27 budget is $188,964,926. The City remains below the legal appropriation limit by $356,226,640.

Packet Page. 473
Personnel Compensation
As changes are made to salaries or classifications, the City is required to adopt a revised salary schedule and resolution in a public meeting. The attached salary schedule meets the California Public Employees Retirement Systems (CalPERS) pay rate reporting requirements in accordance with Government Code Section 20636 defining “Compensation Earnable” and the California Code of Regulations (CCR) Section 570.5. Attachment 9 provides the City of San Bernardino’s city-wide FY 2026/27 salary schedule.

Investment Policy
State law requires that all municipalities have an investment policy approved by its governing board and that it approves the policy on an annual basis. The investment policy serves as the foundation of a local agency’s investment goals and priorities. A good investment policy encompasses the cash, treasury, and investment management functions of an agency. It serves as a guide for setting and achieving program objectives, defines rules and establishes benchmarks, and reduces exposure to liability. An approved investment policy demonstrates that the governing body is performing its fiduciary responsibilities, thereby instilling trust and confidence in the public it serves. It is also important to note that rating agencies pay close attention to an agency’s investment policy and portfolio in determining its credit rating. The Finance Department is responsible for submitting the Investment Policy for adoption by the Mayor and City Council on an annual basis. For FY 2026/27, the City had no major policy or operational changes in the Investment Policy. Attachment 5 provides the City of San Bernardino’s Investment Policy for FY 2026/27.
2021-2025 Strategic Targets and Goals
The proposed budget review aligns with all key targets of the City Council’s Strategic Plan: Improved Operational & Financial Capacity, Focused, Aligned Leadership and Unified Community, Improved Quality of Life, Economic Growth & Development.

Funding projects and programs at every level of the organization ensures that the City can achieve the goals and priorities established by the Mayor and City Council.

Fiscal Impact
The adoption of the operating budget allocates the available resources to programs, services, and departments for the upcoming fiscal year. The total revenue allocations for FY 2026/27, across all funds is $318,179,271.11: $233,826,392 in General Fund and $84,352,879.11 for all Other Funds. The total operating and CIP expenditure allocations for FY 2025/26 across all funds is $328,463,123.98: $251,084,665 in General Fund and $77,378,458.99 for all Other Funds. Of these expenditure allocations, $9,899,568 specifically pertain to CIP expenditures.

Conclusion
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino:

1. Conduct the Public Hearing on the Proposed Fiscal Year 2026/27 Operating Budget and 2027-2031 Capital Improvement Plan; and

2. Adopt Resolution No. 2026-071 approving the City of San Bernardino’s Fiscal Packet Page. 474
Year 2026/27 Operating Budget and 2027-2031 Capital Improvement Program; and

3. Adopt Resolution No. 2026-072 establishing the City’s Appropriations Limit as required by Article XIIIB of the California State Constitution; and

4. Adopt Resolution No. 2026-073 approving the updated Investment Policy for FY 2026/27; and

Attachments
Attachment 1 - Resolution 2026-071 (Budget Adoption)
Attachment 2 - Resolution 2026-072 (Appropriations Limit) Attachment 3 - Exhibit A Appropriations Limit Calculation – 2027 Attachment 4 - Resolution No. 2026-073 (Investment Policy) Attachment 5 - Exhibit A – Investment Policy Statement FY 2026-27 Attachment 6 - Exhibit A – Investment Policy Statement FY 2026-27 (Tracked Changes)
Attachment 7 - General Fund Reserve Policy
Attachment 8 - Public Hearing Notice Publication English Attachment 8 - Public Hearing Notice Publication Spanish Attachment 9 – 2026-27 Salary Schedule
Attachment 10 – FY 2027-2031 Updated CIP List
Attachment 11 – Proposed Measure S CIP Deferrals
Ward:

All Wards
Synopsis of Previous Council Actions:

April 29, 2026 - Mayor and City Council held the budget workshop for the Proposed FY 2026/27 Budget.

CC
Eric Levitt, City Manager
Packet Page. 475
Resolution No. 2026-071
Resolution 2026-071
June 17, 2026

Page 1 of 4 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-071

RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA,

APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE CITY OF SAN
BERNARDINO’S OPERATING BUDGET AND CAPITAL

IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) FOR FISCAL YEARS
2026/27 AND AUTHORIZING THE CARRYOVER OF

ENCUMBRANCES AND UNEXPENDED APPROPRIATIONS

FOR AUTHORIZED BUT UNCOMPLETED PROJECTS,
UPON APPROVAL BY THE CITY MANAGER.

WHEREAS, Section 701 of the Charter of the City of San Bernardino mandates that at least sixty (60) days prior to the beginning of each fiscal year, the City Manager shall prepare and submit to the Mayor and City Council the proposed budget and an accompanying message, outlining the proposed financial policies of the City for the ensuing fiscal year and the impact of those policies on future years; and
WHEREAS, Section 703 of the Charter requires the City Council to publish a general summary of the proposed budget and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and to hold one or more public hearings thereon, after which the budget and CIP shall be adopted, as they may be amended, by the Council before the beginning of the fiscal year; and WHEREAS, the City Manager has prepared and submitted the proposed Fiscal Year 2026/27 Operating Budget and the FY 2027–2031 Capital Improvement Program, aligning with the City's Strategic Plan and addressing key priorities such as infrastructure reinvestment, fiscal sustainability, and enhanced service delivery; and
WHEREAS, the proposed budget reflects a total of $328.5 million in expenditures across all funds, including $9.9 million allocated for capital improvements, and incorporates strategic measures including department-wide expenditure reductions, an additional 2.5% reduction in travel and training expenditures, optimization of Internal Service Funds, and vacancy retention strategies; and
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted publicly noticed budget workshops on April 29, 2026, and is holding a duly noticed public hearing on June 17, 2026, thereby providing multiple opportunities for public input, review, and discussion in accordance with the City Charter and in support of transparency and community engagement in the budget adoption process; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council have considered the proposed FY 2026/27 Operating Budget and CIP for FY 2027-2031 and input from the public, and desire to adopt the Proposed FY 2026/27 Operating Budget and CIP for FY 2027-2031 as the FY 2026/27 Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Program.

Packet Page. 476
Resolution No. 2026-071
Resolution 2026-071
June 17, 2026

Page 2 of 4 ends

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 2. The Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino hereby approve and adopt the Fiscal Year 2026/27 Operating Budget and the Fiscal Years 2027–2031 Capital Improvement Program as proposed by the City Manager. The total revenue allocations for FY 2026/27, across all funds is $318,179,271.11: $233,826,392 in General Fund and $84,352,879.11 for all Other Funds. The total operating and CIP expenditure allocations for FY 2025/26 across all funds is $328,463,123.98: $251,084,665 in General Fund and $77,378,458.99 for all Other Funds.

Of these expenditure allocations, $9,899,568 specifically pertain to CIP expenditures. Thes totals listed are subject to any amendments or modifications approved by the City Council during the public hearing on June 17, 2026.

SECTION 3. The City Manager, or designee, are hereby authorized and directed to make any necessary changes, amendments, or technical corrections to the Fiscal Year 2026/27 Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Program to reflect the actions and decisions made by the City Council during the budget public hearing process, and to implement the adopted budget in accordance with City Council direction.

SECTION 4. The FY 2026/27 Position Summary, as presented in the budget documents, is hereby adopted, establishing the City’s authorized full-time staffing levels for the fiscal year.

SECTION 5. Upon the close of Fiscal Year 2025/26, the Fiscal Year 2026/27 Operating Budget shall be automatically amended to include and reappropriate any outstanding encumbrances, ensuring adequate funding for legally committed obligations. Additionally, unexpended appropriations for authorized, but uncompleted projects, as approved by the City Council, may be carried forward into the Fiscal Year 2026/27 Operating Budget upon approval of the City Manager.

SECTION 6. The Capital Improvement Program Budget for Fiscal Year 2026/27 shall be considered amended upon the close of Fiscal Year 2025/26 to include and reappropriate funds for all previously approved projects that have not been initiated or completed. The Mayor and City Council authorize the City Manager, or designee, to carryover balances on Capital Improvement Projects (CIP), both encumbrances and continuing appropriations, from the prior years into the next fiscal year to ensure the continuation of approved projects.

SECTION 7. The City Manager, or designee, are hereby authorized to appropriate donations and grants received during FY 2026/27 up to $100,000 per source or grantor, per department. Donations and grant awards that require any matching funds (in-cash), or that exceed the $100,00 limit from a single source or grantor per department, shall require City Council approval. Any resolutions authorizing budget amendments related to donations and grants in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.

Packet Page. 477
Resolution No. 2026-071
Resolution 2026-071
June 17, 2026

Page 3 of 4 ends

SECTION 8. The Mayor and City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.

SECTION 9. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable.

SECTION 10. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately.

APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk this 17th day of June 2026.

Helen Tran, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Attest:

Telicia Lopez, CMC, City Clerk
Approved as to form:

Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney
Packet Page. 478
Resolution No. 2026-071
Resolution 2026-071
June 17, 2026

Page 4 of 4 ends

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
I, Telicia Lopez, CMC, City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. 2026-071, adopted at a regular meeting held on the 17th day of June 2026 by the following vote:

Telicia Lopez, CMC, City Clerk
Packet Page. 479
Resolution No. 2026-072
Resolution 2026-072
June 17, 2026

Page 1 of 3 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-072

RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA,
DETERMINING AND ESTABLISHING FISCAL YEAR 2026-
27 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT (GANN LIMIT) PURSUANT TO

ARTICLE XIII B OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, AS AMENDED BY PROPOSITION 111
AND SENATE BILL 88.

WHEREAS, Article XIII B of the Constitution of the State of California as proposed by the initiative Measure approved by the people at the special statewide election held on November 6, 1979, provides that the total annual appropriations subject to limitation of each local government shall not exceed the appropriations limit of such entity for the prior year adjusted for changes in the cost of living and population except as otherwise specifically provided for in said Article; and WHEREAS, Section 7910 of the Government Code provides that each year the governing body of each local jurisdiction shall, by resolution, establish its appropriations limit for the following fiscal year pursuant to Article XIII B at a regularly scheduled meeting or a noticed special meeting; and

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 2. The Appropriations Limit for the City of San Bernardino, as established in accordance with Article XIII B of the Constitution of the State of California and detailed as Exhibit “A,” is $545,191,566.

SECTION 3. The Mayor and City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.

SECTION 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk this 17th day of June 2026.

Packet Page. 480
Resolution No. 2026-072
Resolution 2026-072
June 17, 2026

Page 2 of 3 ends

Helen Tran, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Attest:

Telicia Lopez, CMC, City Clerk
Approved as to form:

Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney
Packet Page. 481
Resolution No. 2026-072
Resolution 2026-072
June 17, 2026

Page 3 of 3 ends

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)

COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO)

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO)
I, Telicia Lopez, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. 2026-072, adopted at a regular meeting held on the 17th day of June 2026 by the following vote:

Telicia Lopez, CMC, City Clerk
Packet Page. 482
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO  FY 2026/27 ADOPTED OPERATING & CAPITAL BUDGET Appropriations Limits
FY 2025-26 Appropriations Limit 519,789,307
FY 2026-27 Adjustment Factors
Percentage Change in Per Capita Personal Income 4.95%
Percentage Change in Population -0.06%
Appropriations Change Factor (Change in CPI x Change in Population) 1.04887030 FY 2026-2027 APPROPRIATION LIMIT 545,191,566
FY 2026-2027 APPROPRIATIONS SUBJECT TO LIMITATIONS 188,964,926 (OVER)/UNDER APPROPRIATION LIMIT 356,226,640

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
FY 2026-27

APPROPRIATION LIMITATION COMPUTATION
For Fiscal Year 2026-27, the change in the California Per Capita Personal Income is 4.95% and the change in San Bernardino's population is -0.06%. Based on this data, San Bernardino's appropriation limit for FY 2026-27 is calculated at $545,191,566. The total appropriations subject to limitation in the City’s FY 2026-27 budget is $188,964,926. The City remains below the legal appropriation limit by $356,226,640.

Article XIIIB of the California Constitution, introduced by Proposition 4 in 1979 and later amended by Proposition 111 in 1990, imposes limits on the growth rate of appropriations for cities and other local governments. This growth rate is based on changes in population and California's Per Capita Personal Income. In May 2026, the California Department of Finance provided cities with updated factors for population change and Per Capita Personal Income to use in calculating their appropriation limits.

Packet Page. 483
(b)
(a) Percentage (c) (d) (f) (g)
Appropriation Beginning Change in Percentage Percentage (e) Appropriation Ending Limit Appropriation Per Capita Change in Change in Greater of Change Appropriation Year Limit Personal Income County Population City Population (c) or (d) Factor Limit 2013-2014 288,220,388
2014-2015 288,220,388 -0.23% 0.78% 0.41% 0.78% 1.0054821 289,800,429 2015-2016 289,800,429 3.82% 1.09% 0.65% 1.09% 1.0495164 304,150,298 2016-2017 304,150,298 5.37% 0.93% 0.76% 0.93% 1.0634994 323,463,662 2017-2018 323,463,662 3.69% 1.16% 0.60% 1.16% 1.0489280 339,290,105 2018-2019 339,290,105 3.67% 0.95% 0.49% 0.95% 1.0465487 355,083,601 2019-2020 355,083,601 3.85% 0.90% 0.11% 0.90% 1.0478465 372,073,109 2020-2021 372,073,109 3.73% 0.51% 0.13% 0.51% 1.0425902 387,919,788 2021-2022 387,919,788 5.73% 0.17% -0.62% 0.17% 1.0590974 410,844,843 2022-2023 410,844,843 7.55% 0.14% -0.55% 0.14% 1.0770057 442,482,238 2023-2024 442,482,238 4.44% 0.12% 1.25% 1.25% 1.0574550 467,905,055 2024-2025 467,905,055 3.62% 0.42% 0.39% 0.42% 1.0405520 486,879,559 2025-2026 486,879,559 6.44% 0.30% 0.08% 0.30% 1.0675932 519,789,307 2026-2027 519,789,307 4.95% -0.06% -0.46% -0.06% 1.0488703 545,191,566 City of San Bernardino
GANN Limit Calculation
For the years 2014-2027
Packet Page. 484
May 1, 2026
Dear Fiscal Officer:

Price Factor and Population Information
Appropriations Limit
California Revenue and Taxation Code section 2227 requires the Department of Finance to transmit an estimate of the percentage change in population to local governments.

Each local jurisdiction must use their percentage change in population factor for January 1, 2026, in conjunction with a change in the cost of living, or price factor, to calculate their appropriations limit for fiscal year 2026–27. Attachment A provides the change in California’s per capita personal income and an example for utilizing the factors to calculate the 2026–27 appropriations limit. Attachment B provides the city and unincorporated county population percentage change. Attachment C provides the population percentage change for counties and their summed incorporated areas. The population percentage change data excludes federal and state institutionalized populations and military populations.

Population Percent Change for Special Districts
Some special districts must establish an annual appropriations limit. California Revenue and Taxation Code section 2228 provides additional information regarding the appropriations limit. Article XIII B, section 9(C) of the California Constitution exempts certain special districts from the appropriations limit calculation mandate. Special districts required by law to calculate their appropriations limit must present the calculation as part of their annual audit. Any questions special districts have on this requirement should be directed to their county, district legal counsel, or the law itself. No state agency reviews the local appropriations limits.

Population Certification
The population certification program applies only to cities and counties. California Revenue and Taxation Code section 11005.6 mandates Finance to automatically certify any population estimate that exceeds the current certified population with the State Controller’s Office. Finance will certify the higher estimate to the State Controller by June 1, 2026. Please note: The prior year’s city population estimates may be revised.

The per capita personal income change is based on historical data.

If you have any questions regarding this data, please contact the Demographic Research Unit at (916) 323-4086.
/s Erika Li
Attachment
Packet Page. 485
May 2026
Attachment A
A. Price Factor: Article XIII B specifies that local jurisdictions select their cost of living factor to compute their appropriation limit by a vote of their governing body. The cost of living factor provided here is per capita personal income. If the percentage change in per capita personal income is selected, the percentage change to be used in setting the fiscal year 2026–27 appropriation limit is:

Per Capita Personal Income
Fiscal Year Percentage change
(FY) over prior year
2026-27 4.95
B. Following is an example using sample population change and the change in California per capita personal income as growth factors in computing a 2026–27 appropriation limit.
2026–27:

Per Capita Cost of Living Change = 4.95 percent
Population Change = -0.14 percent
Per Capita Cost of Living converted to a ratio: 4.95 + 100 = 1.0495 100
Population converted to a ratio: -0.14 + 100 = 0.9986
100
Calculation of factor for FY 2026–27: 1.0495 x 0.9986 = 1.0480 Packet Page. 486
California Department of Finance
Demographic Research Unit
Population Data for Price and Population Letter
Population and Excluded Population for January 1, 2025 and January 1, 2026 Released: May 1, 2026
Table of Contents (links to internal worksheets)
Example Page with Price Factor
Population Data by Jurisdiction
Population Data by County
For more information about the population estimates:
https://dof.ca.gov/forecasting/demographics/estimates-e1/ Data Prepared by:

Demographic Research Unit
California Department of Finance
email: [email protected]
phone: (916) 323-4086
Packet Page. 487
About the Data
FISCAL YEAR 2026-27
Attachment B
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions*
January 1, 2025 to January 1, 2026, and Total Population January 1, 2026 City County
Percent Change 25-
26 Population Minus
Exclusions 1-1-25
Population Minus
Exclusions 1-1-26
Total Population 1-1-
26 Adelanto San Bernardino -1.73 37,298 36,652 36,652
Apple Valley San Bernardino -0.53 75,633 75,229 75,236
Barstow San Bernardino -0.93 24,656 24,427 24,727
Big Bear Lake San Bernardino -0.79 4,959 4,920 4,920
Chino San Bernardino 0.42 92,161 92,550 95,946
Chino Hills San Bernardino -0.56 77,626 77,191 77,191
Colton San Bernardino -0.70 53,219 52,844 52,844
Fontana San Bernardino 0.60 218,460 219,774 219,774
Grand Terrace San Bernardino -0.90 12,933 12,817 12,817 Hesperia San Bernardino 0.72 102,613 103,349 103,349
Highland San Bernardino -0.60 56,997 56,655 56,655
Loma Linda San Bernardino -0.18 25,399 25,354 25,400
Montclair San Bernardino 2.19 37,557 38,378 38,378
Needles San Bernardino 0.15 4,789 4,796 4,796
Ontario San Bernardino 1.36 185,346 187,863 187,863
Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino -0.24 176,846 176,418 176,418 Redlands San Bernardino -0.27 74,013 73,811 73,811
Rialto San Bernardino 0.66 106,104 106,809 106,809
San Bernardino San Bernardino -0.46 221,973 220,961 222,292 Twentynine Palms San Bernardino -0.41 16,892 16,823 27,166 Upland San Bernardino -0.75 78,996 78,406 78,406
Victorville San Bernardino -0.63 136,737 135,871 139,680 Yucaipa San Bernardino -0.54 55,008 54,711 54,711
Yucca Valley San Bernardino -0.70 21,952 21,798 21,798
Unincorporated San Bernardino -0.55 291,844 290,253 299,046 Incorporated San Bernardino 0.01 1,898,167 1,898,407 1,917,639 County Total San Bernardino -0.06 2,190,011 2,188,660 2,216,685 *Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.

Packet Page. 488
About the Data
FISCAL YEAR 2026-27
Attachment C
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions*
January 1, 2025 to January 1, 2026, and Total Population January 1, 2026 City County Percent Change 25-26
Population Minus
Exclusions 1-1-25
Population Minus
Exclusions 1-1-26 Total Population 1-1-26
Incorporated San Bernardino 0.01 1,898,167 1,898,407 1,917,639 County Total San Bernardino -0.06 2,190,011 2,188,660 2,216,685 *Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.

Packet Page. 489
Resolution No. 2026-073
Resolution 2026-073
June 17, 2026

Page 1 of 3 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-073

RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA,

APPROVING AN INVESTMENT POLICY FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2026/2027
WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino has an existing investment policy consistent with state law and sound financial management; and
WHEREAS, the state law requires that the managing board of any municipality within the state review and reapprove the investment policy on an annual basis; and WHEREAS, the annual adoption of the Investment Policy will be included in conjunction with the adoption of the new biennial budget cycles; and WHEREAS, the Director of Finance has reviewed the 2026/27 investment policy last revised November 5, 2025, and has recommended changes to the proposed policy attached hereto as Exhibit “A”; and
WHEREAS, such policy is presented to the Mayor and City Council for its review and approval for Fiscal Year 2026/27 and is consistent with state law.

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 2. The Mayor and City Council hereby adopt the “Investment Policy for FY 2026/27,” attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein and made a part of this Resolution.

SECTION 4. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable.

SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately.

Packet Page. 490
Resolution No. 2026-073
Resolution 2026-073
June 17, 2026

Page 2 of 3 ends

APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk this 17th day of June 2026.

Helen Tran, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Attest:

Telicia Lopez, CMC, City Clerk
Approved as to form:

Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney
Packet Page. 491
Resolution No. 2026-073
Resolution 2026-073
June 17, 2026

Page 3 of 3 ends

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
I, Telicia Lopez, CMC, City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. 2026-073, adopted at a regular meeting held on the 17th day of June 2026 by the following vote:

Telicia Lopez, CMC, City Clerk
Packet Page. 492

CITY OF

SAN BERNARDINO

INVESTMENT POLICY
Fiscal Year 2026/27
Proposed June 17, 2026
Tarik Rahmani
Director of Finance & Management Services
Exhibit A
Packet Page. 493
I. PURPOSE
To establish guidelines for the prudent investment of public funds in a manner that will protect City funds, meet daily cash flow expenditures, and comply with all federal, state, and local laws and ordinances governing the investment of public funds.

II. POLICY & ADOPTION
It shall be the policy of the City of San Bernardino to annually review and adopt an Investment Policy by resolution of the City Council. This Policy applies to all financial assets and funds held by the City of San Bernardino and the Successor Agency to the San Bernardino Redevelopment Agency. The funds covered by this policy include:
*General Fund
*Special Revenue Funds
*Capital Project Funds
*Proprietary Funds
*Other funds that may be created
Any modifications to the Policy must be approved by the City Council.

III. PROCEDURES
The Director of Finance shall annually review the City's Investment Policy, and incorporate any changes in state law, recommendations from the City's Investment Advisor, recommendations from the various national and state organizations of municipal finance officers, or other changes recommended by City staff. The revised Investment Policy shall be presented to the Finance Committee and the City Council for review and approval.
(A) Responsibilities
No person may engage in investment activities except as provided under the terms of this Policy and the procedures established by the Director of Finance.

1. Responsibilities of the City Council
The City Council shall annually consider and adopt a written Investment Policy. As provided in this Policy, the Council shall receive monthly Investment Reports.

2. Responsibilities of the Director of Finance
The Director of Finance is appointed by and serves at the pleasure of the City Manager and is subject to his/her direction and supervision. The Director of Finance is charged with responsibility for the conduct of all Finance Department operations. The City Charter places the "City Exhibit A
Packet Page. 494
Treasurer" responsibilities amongst the duties of the Director of Finance.

That individual is charged with responsibility for carrying out all investment actions. He/she may delegate the day-to-day investment activities to their designee(s) but not the responsibility for the overall investment program. If authorized by the City Council, the Director of Finance may also utilize the services of an external investment advisor to assist with the investment program.

The Director of Finance, through supporting staff members, is responsible to manage all public funds and securities belonging to or under the control of the City and the Successor Agency, including the deposit and investment of those funds in accordance with principles of sound treasury management and applicable laws and ordinances.

Appropriate internal controls designed to ensure that assets of the City are protected from loss, theft, or misuse, including but not limited to separation of duties and multiple approvers for transactions, shall be maintained at all times in order to safeguard the City's assets.

3. Responsibilities of the City's Investment Advisor (if applicable) The City may engage in the services of outside professionals for evaluation and advice regarding the City's investment program. An authorized Investment Advisor may provide investment management services, which may also include facilitating trade executions under the direction of the Director of Finance or designee. Any Investment Advisor shall be registered by the Securities and Exchange Commission and licensed to do business in the State of California. An authorized Investment Advisor shall invest the City's funds in investments that are in compliance with this policy and provide accurate and timely reports of its investment activities to City staff. The Investment Advisor shall never take possession of the City's funds or assets.

4. Internal Controls
The Director of Finance is responsible for establishing and maintaining an internal control structure designed to ensure that the assets of the City are protected from loss, theft, fraud or misuse.

The City's external independent auditing firm shall perform an annual analysis and review of internal controls, account activity and compliance with policies and procedures.
(B) Prudent Investor Rule
The standard of prudence to be used by the Director of Finance shall be the "prudent investor" standard. This shall be applied in the context of managing an overall portfolio.

Exhibit A
Packet Page. 495
The "Prudent Investor Rule" provides, pursuant to California Government Code Section 53600.3, that investments shall be made with judgment and care-under circumstances then prevailing - which persons of prudence, discretion and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived. The Director of Finance and any designee of the Director of Finance, as investment officers acting in accordance with written
procedures and the investment policy and exercising due diligence, shall be relieved of personal responsibility for any individual security's credit risk or market price changes, provided deviations from expectations are reported to the City Council in a timely fashion and appropriate action is taken to control adverse developments.
(C) Ethics and Conflicts of Interest
In addition to state and local statutes relating to conflicts of interest, all persons involved in the investment process shall refrain from personal business activity that conflicts with proper execution of the investment program or impairs their ability to make impartial investment decisions. Employees and investment officers are required to annually file applicable financial disclosures as required for “public officials who manage public investments” by the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) and are subject to California law relative to conflicts of interest.
(D) Level of Investment
The City strives to maintain the level of investment of all investable cash as near to 100 percent as possible through current and projected cash flow management.

The Director of Finance shall maintain a system to monitor and forecast revenues and expenditures so that City funds can be invested to the fullest extent possible while providing sufficient liquidity to meet the City's reasonably anticipated cash flow requirements. Maturities of investments will be selected to provide necessary liquidity, manage interest rate risk, and optimize earnings. Because of inherent difficulties in accurately forecasting cash flow requirements, a portion of the portfolio should be continuously invested in readily available funds. (E) Investment Objectives
The City seeks safety and liquidity in all of its investments followed by yield.

Safety, liquidity, and yield are defined as follows:

1. Safety. Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the investment program. Investments shall be undertaken in a manner that seeks to ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio.

2. Liquidity. The investment portfolio shall remain sufficiently liquid to meet operating requirements that may be reasonably anticipated. This is accomplished by structuring the portfolio so that securities mature Exhibit A
Packet Page. 496
concurrent with cash needs to meet anticipated demands.

3. Yield. The investment portfolio shall be designed with the objective of attaining a market rate of return, taking into account the investment risk constraints and liquidity needs. Return on investment is of secondary importance compared to the safety and liquidity objectives described above.
(F) Allowable Investments
The investments listed in this Policy are authorized investments pursuant to Sections 53601 and 53635 of the California Government Code and are authorized investments for the City subject, however, to the restrictions set forth in Section "K" of this Investment Policy. In the event that an apparent discrepancy is found between this Policy and the Government Code, the more restrictive parameters will take precedence.
(G) Collateralization
If collateral is required for a particular investment type, it will be provided in compliance with California Government Code requirements. (H) Investment Pools/Mutual Funds
Prior to investing in any pooled investment program (e.g., LAIF, money market funds), the Director of Finance will review the program's documentation (e.g., investment policy, policies for participation, fees) to determine the appropriateness of the pool for City funds. Whenever the City has funds invested in a pooled investment program, the Director of Finance should periodically review the pool's investment holdings. The review shall, at a minimum, obtain the following information:
 A description of eligible investment securities, and a written statement of investment policy and objectives.
 A description of interest calculations and how it is distributed, and how gains and losses are treated.
 A description of how the securities are safeguarded (including the settlement processes), and how often the securities are priced and the program audited.
 A description of who may invest in the program, how often, and what size of deposits and withdrawals are allowed.
 A schedule for receiving statements and portfolio listings.  A description of how the pool/fund utilizes reserves, retained earnings, etc.
 A fee schedule, including when and how fees are assessed.  The eligibility of the pool/fund to invest in bond proceeds and special district funds, and a description of its practices.
(I) Diversification
Exhibit A
Packet Page. 497
The City shall diversify the investments within the portfolio to avoid incurring unreasonable risks inherent in over-investing in specific instruments, individual financial institutions, or maturities. To promote diversification, unless a more restrictive limit applies, no more than 10% of the portfolio may be invested in the securities of any one issuer, regardless of security type; excluding U.S.

Treasuries, federal agencies, supranationals, medium-term notes, assetbacked/mortgage backed/CMO securities, and pooled investments such as LAIF, money market funds, or local government investment pools. (J) Maximum Maturities
For those investment types for which this Policy does not specify a maturity limit, no individual investment shall exceed a maturity of five years from the date of purchase unless the City Council has granted express authority to make that investment either specifically or as a part of an investment program approved by the City Council no less than three months prior to the investment. Both Agency and Non-Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities and Asset-Backed Securities may be measured by their Weighted-Average-Life when determining allowable maturity limits. The weighted average duration of the investment portfolio shall not exceed 3.0 years.
(K) Authorized Investments of the City
The following types of investments are authorized by this Policy

1. U.S. Treasury Instruments. United States Treasury notes, bonds, bills, or certificates of indebtedness, or those for which the faith and credit of the United States are pledged for the payment of principal and interest. There is no limitation as to the percentage of the City's portfolio that may be invested in this category. The maximum maturity for this investment is five years from the time of purchase.

2. State of California's Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). A State of California-managed investment pool. The maximum amount invested in this category may not exceed the limit set by LAIF for operating accounts ($75 million).

3. Local Government Investment Pools ("LGIP''). Shares of beneficial interest issued by joint powers authority organized pursuant to Section 6509.7 that invests in the securities and obligations authorized in Government Code (e.g. Cal Trust, CAMP, CLASS). The City will limit investments to LGIPs that seek to maintain a stable net asset value. There is no limitation as to the percentage of the City's portfolio that may be invested in this category.

4. Municipal Bonds. Registered state warrants or treasury notes or bonds of this state, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue-producing property owned, controlled, or operated by the state or Exhibit A
Packet Page. 498
by a department, board, agency, or authority of the state.

Registered treasury notes or bonds of any of the other 49 states in addition to California, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue-producing property owned, controlled, or operated by a state or by a department, board, agency, or authority of any of the other 49 states, in addition to California.

Bonds, notes, warrants, or other evidences of indebtedness of a local agency within this state, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue producing property owned, controlled, or operated by the local agency, or by a department, board, agency, or authority of the local agency.

Purchases are limited to securities rated in a rating category of "A" (longterm) or "A-1" (short-term) or their equivalents or better by a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (NRSRO). A maximum of 30% of the City's portfolio may be invested in this category. The maximum maturity for this investment is five years from the time of purchase.

5. Federal Agency Securities. Federal agency or United States governmentsponsored enterprise obligations, participations, or other instruments, including those issued by or fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by federal agencies or United States government-sponsored enterprises. There is no limitation as to the percentage of the City's portfolio that may be invested in this category. The maximum maturity for this investment is five years from the time of purchase. The maturity of Agency mortgage-backed or assetbacked securities shall be measured by Weighted-Average-Life (WAL), which is not to exceed 5 years.

6. Negotiable Certificates of Deposit. Negotiable certificates of deposit issued by a nationally or state-chartered bank, a savings association or a federal association, a state or federal credit union, or by a federally licensed or state-licensed branch of a foreign bank. Securities in this category shall be limited to the maximum amount covered by federal deposit insurance currently set at $250,000. A maximum of 30% of the City's portfolio may be invested in this category. The maximum maturity for this investment is five years from the time of purchase.

7. Commercial Paper. Commercial paper of "prime" quality of the highest ranking or of the highest letter and number rating as provided for by a NRSRO. The entity that issues the commercial paper shall meet all of the following conditions in either paragraph (1) or (2):

1. The entity meets the following criteria: (A) Is organized and operating in the United States as a general corporation; (B) Has total assets in excess of five hundred million dollars
($500,000,000), and (C) Has debt other than commercial paper, if any, that is rated in a rating category of "A" or its equivalent or better by an NRSRO.

Exhibit A
Packet Page. 499

2. The entity meets the following criteria: (A) is organized within the United States as a special purpose corporation, trust, or limited liability company, (B) Has program-wide credit enhancements including but not limited to, overcollateralization, letters of credit, or a surety bond, and
(C) Has commercial paper that is rated “A-1” or better, or the equivalent, by an NRSRO.

Purchases are limited to securities that have a maximum maturity of 397 days.

A maximum of 25% of the City’s portfolio may be invested in this category with a maximum of 10% per issuer.

8. Corporate or Medium-Term Notes. Corporate or medium-term notes, defined as all corporate and depository institution debt securities with a maximum remaining maturity of five years or less, issued by corporations organized and operating within the United States or by depository institutions licensed by the United States or any state and operating within the United States. Purchases are limited to securities rated in a rating category of "A" or its equivalent or better by an NRSRO. A maximum of 30% of the City's portfolio may be invested in this category with a maximum of 10% per issuer.

9. Money Market Funds ("MMF"). Purchases are restricted to Government Money Market Funds. Furthermore, these Money Market Funds must have met either of the following criteria: (A) Attained the highest ranking or the highest letter and numerical rating provided by not less than two NRSROs, or (B) Retained an investment advisor with not less than five years' experience and registered or exempt from registration with the SEC, with assets under management in excess of five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000). A maximum of 20% of the City's portfolio may be invested in this category.

10. Supranational Obligations. United States dollar denominated senior unsecured unsubordinated obligations issued or unconditionally guaranteed by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, International Finance Corporation, or Inter-American Development Bank, with a maximum remaining maturity of five years or less, and eligible for purchase and sale within the United States. Investments under this subdivision shall be rated in a rating category of "AA" or its equivalent or better by a NRSRO. A maximum of 30% of the City's portfolio may be invested in this category with a maximum of 10% per issuer.

11. Bankers Acceptances. Bankers’ acceptances are short-term debt instruments issued by a company that is guaranteed by a commercial bank.

Banker Acceptances are limited to institutions with short-term debt obligations of A-1 or higher and have long term debt obligations rated “A” or higher, or the equivalent, by an NRSRO. The maturity shall not exceed 180 days and no more than 40% of the total portfolio may be invested in Bankers’ Acceptances and no more than 5% per issuer.

Exhibit A
Packet Page. 500

12. Deposits Placed Through a Private Sector Entity. The City may invest in Certificates of Deposit placed through a deposit placement service that uses a private sector entity to place deposits with eligible depository institutions. These placements are subject to the following limitations:
• All deposits must be fully insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund (NCUSIF).
• The City may invest up to 50% of its surplus funds in such deposits through January 1, 2031.
• Beginning January 1, 2031, the investment limit will revert to 30% of surplus funds, unless otherwise amended by law.
• The placement service and the participating financial institutions must provide documentation verifying the full insurance of the deposits

13. Asset-Backed, Mortgage-Backed, Mortgage Pass-Through securities and Collateralized Mortgage Obligations. A mortgage passthrough security, collateralized mortgage obligation, mortgagebacked or other pay-through bond, equipment lease-backed certificate, consumer receivable passthrough certificate, or consumer receivablebacked bond with a maximum remaining maturity of five years or less as measured by Weighted-Average Life (WAL). Securities shall be rated in a rating category of “AA” or its equivalent or better by an NRSRO. A maximum of 20% of the City’s portfolio may be invested in the category.

Exhibit A
Packet Page. 501
City of San Bernardino Authorized Investment Policy Table Investment Type Maximum Term Maximum % of
Portfolio Maximum per Issuer Minimum Rating
US Treasury Obligations 5 Years NONE NONE NONE
Local Agency Investment
Fund (LAIF) N/A
The City may invest up
to the maximum
amount permitted by
California state law
($75 million).

N/A NONE
Joint Powers/Local
Government Investment
Pool

N/A NONE N/A NONE
Municipal Debt 5 Years 30% NONE A1, A
Federal Agency
Obligations
5 years (MBS/ABS
maturities
measured by
Weighted-AverageLife)

NONE NONE NONE
Certificate of Deposits 5 Years 30% $250K
Securites in this
category shall be
limited to the
maximum amount
covered by federal
deposit insurance.

Commercial Paper 397 days 25% 10% A1/P1, A
Medium Term/Corporate
Notes
5 Years 30% 10% A
Money Market Mutual
Funds N/A 20% NONE AAA
Supranational
Obligations
(IBRD, IFC, IDB)
5 Years 30% 10% AA
Bankers' Acceptances 180 Days 40% 5% A1, A
Asset-Backed, MortgageBacked, Mortgage PassThrough Securities and Collateralized Mortgage
Obligations
5 years as
measured by
Weighted-AverageLife
20% NONE AA
Exhibit A
Packet Page. 502
(L) Prohibited Investments
Furthermore, the City will not invest in inverse floaters, range notes, interestonly strips, or any security that could result in zero interest accrual if held to maturity. In order to anticipate market changes and provide a level of security for all funds, the collateralization level will 100% of market value for Certificate of Deposits and 102% for reverse purchase agreements or principal and accrued interest. Collateral will always be held by an independent third party with whom the entity has a current custodial relationship
(M) Performance Standards
The investment portfolio shall be managed with the objective of obtaining a market-average rate of return during budgetary and economic cycles, considering the City's investment risk constraints and the cash flow needs.

Investment return is a consideration only after the core investment portfolio tenets of safety and liquidity have been met. The Director of Finance will adopt a benchmark which best approximates the composition and weighted average maturity of the City's portfolio. The City will monitor the City's portfolio yield against the US Treasury Constant Maturity and the performance yield presented by LAIF. However, the benchmark will be used only as a reference tool and does not infer that the portfolio will be managed in an attempt to attain or exceed the stated benchmark. Benchmarks may change over time based on changes in market conditions or cash flow requirements.

The selected performance benchmarks shall be representative of the City's overall investment objectives and liquidity requirements. (N) Investment Reporting
The Director of Finance shall submit to the City Council, on a monthly basis, a report summarizing the individual transactions executed within the month. The Director of Finance shall submit to the City Council on a quarterly basis a report summarizing the status of the current investment portfolio and the individual transactions executed over the last quarter. The report shall be prepared in a manner which shall allow the City Council to ascertain whether investment activities during the reporting period have conformed to the Investment Policy.

The report will include the following elements:
 Type of investment
 Institution/Issuer
 Purchase Date
 Date of maturity
 Amount of deposit or cost of the investment
Exhibit A
Packet Page. 503
 Face value of the investment
 Current market value of securities and source of valuation  Rate of interest
 Interest earnings
 Statement relating the report to its compliance with the Statement of Investment Policy or the manner in which the portfolio is not in compliance
 Statement on availability of funds to meet the next six months’ obligations  Percentage of Portfolio by Investment Type
 Days to Maturity for all Investments
 Comparative report on Monthly Investment Balances & Interest Yields  Monthly transactions
The Investment Advisor shall report to the City, on a monthly basis, the weightedaverage-life for each structured security to ensure compliance with the individual 5-year weighted-average-life limitation.

All data shall be maintained by the Investment Advisor for record-keeping purposes. If a structured security is reported to have a weighted-average-life greater than 5 years, it shall be flagged for immediate discussion with both the City and Investment Advisor to determine if the security shall be held or liquidated, depending on underlying risk and broader market conditions.

Notwithstanding the aforementioned process, any security with a weightedaverage-life greater than 4 years shall be monitored on a monthly basis to note any reporting trends.
(O) Portfolio Review
The Director of Finance shall continually monitor portfolio performance to ensure that the securities in the portfolio are in compliance with this Policy. The Director of Finance shall report any issues of material non-compliance in the next monthly Investment Report. Percentage holding limits and diversification requirements listed in this Policy apply at the time a security is purchased. If a percentage holding limit or diversification requirement is exceeded due to a subsequent change in the portfolio, it is not a compliance violation, but no additional securities may be purchased in that category or for that issuer until the holdings are back under the Policy limits. Credit ratings, where shown, specify the minimum credit rating category required at purchase. In the event a security held by the City is subject to a credit rating change that brings it below the minimum credit ratings specified in this Policy, the Director of Finance will notify the City Council of the change in the next monthly Investment Report. The course of action to be followed will then be decided on a case-by-case basis, considering such factors as the reason for the change, prognosis for recovery or further rating downgrades, and the market price of Exhibit A
Packet Page. 504
the security. If a security is determined to be out of compliance with this Policy due to a subsequent change in this Policy or the Government Code, it may be held to maturity unless there is a requirement that the security be sold. (P) Debt Proceeds
Debt proceeds and bond reserve funds are to be invested in accordance with their respective bond indenture. If the indenture is silent as to the permitted investments, the bond proceeds will be invested in the securities permitted by this Policy. Notwithstanding the other provisions of this Policy, the percentage limitations listed elsewhere in this Policy do not apply to bond proceeds and bond proceeds may be invested beyond five years if the maturities of such investments do not exceed the expected use of the funds, the investments are deemed prudent in the opinion of the Director of Finance, and the investments are not prohibited by the applicable bond documents. Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes or other temporary financing proceeds shall not be invested for a term that exceeds the term of the debt.
(Q) Safe Keeping
To protect against potential losses by collapse of individual securities dealers, all deliverable securities owned by the City, including collateral on repurchase agreements, shall be held in safekeeping by a third party bank trust department acting as agent for the City under the terms of a custody agreement executed by the bank and by the City. All deliverable securities will be received and delivered using standard delivery-versus-payment procedures.
(R) Qualified Financial Institutions and Broker/Dealers The Director of Finance shall maintain a list of approved financial institutions authorized to provide investment related services to the City. In addition, the City shall maintain a list of approved security broker/dealers selected by conducting a process of due diligence. These may include 'primary' dealers or regional dealers that qualify under Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") Rule 15C3- 1 (uniform net capital rule). A copy of this Investment Policy shall be sent annually to all firms with which the City executes investments.

Additionally, all financial institutions and broker/dealers who desire to become qualified bidders of investment transactions must provide the Director of Finance with the following:
 Audited Financial Statements
 Proof of State Registration
 Copy of most recently filed Financial Industry Regulated Authority Exhibit A
Packet Page. 505
(FINRA) documentation
 Certification of having read the Investment Policy and depository contracts of the City of San Bernardino
The Director of Finance will review the existing list of either qualified broker/dealers or qualified bidders for investment transactions on an annual basis. At the discretion of the Director of Finance, and with the due diligence noted above, add or delete either broker/dealers or qualified bidders. (S) Continuing Education and Training
To ensure the highest level of professional standards for the execution of the investment program, investment staff responsible for the day-to-day management of the portfolio are encouraged to engage in continuing education in the areas of cash and investment management.

Exhibit A
Packet Page. 506

GLOSSARY
AGENCIES: Federal agency securities
BANKERS’ ACCEPTANCE (BA): A draft or bill of exchange accepted by a bank or trust company. The accepting institution guarantees payment of the bill, as well as the issuer. The drafts are drawn on a bank by an exporter or importer to obtain funds to pay for specific merchandise. An acceptance is a high grade negotiable instrument.

BENCHMARK: A comparative base for measuring the performance or risk tolerance of the investment portfolio. A benchmark should represent a close correlation to the level of risk and the average duration of the portfolio's investments
BROKER: A broker brings buyers and sellers together for a commission. He/she does not take a position.

CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT (CD): A time deposit with a specific maturity evidenced by a certificate. Large-denomination CD's are typically negotiable.

COLLATERAL: Securities, evidence of deposit or other property, which a borrower pledges to secure repayment of a loan. Also refers to securities pledged by a bank to secure deposits of public monies.

COMMERCIAL PAPER: Short term unsecured promissory note issued by a corporation (including limited liability companies) to raise working capital. These negotiable instruments are purchased at a discount to par value or at par value with interest bearing. Commercial paper is issued by corporations such as General Motors Acceptance Corporation, IBM, Bank of America, etc.

COUPON: a) The annual interest that a bond’s issuer promises to pay the bondholder on the bond’s face value. b) A certificate attached to a bond evidencing interest due on a payment date.

DEALER: A dealer, as opposed to a broker, acts as a principal in all transactions; buying and selling for his/her own account.

DELIVERY VERSUS PAYMENT: There are two methods of delivery of securities:
delivery versus payment and delivery versus receipt. Delivery versus payment is delivery of securities with an exchange of money for the securities. Delivery versus receipt is delivery of securities with an exchange of a signed receipt for the securities.

DIVERSIFICATION: Dividing investment funds among a variety of securities offering Exhibit A
Packet Page. 507
independent returns.

FEDERAL CREDIT AGENCIES: Agencies of the Federal government set up to supply credit to various classes of institutions (e.g. S&L’s, small business firms, students, farmers, farm cooperatives, and exporters).

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION (FDIC): A Federal agency that insures bank deposits, currently up to $250,00 per deposit.

LIQUIDITY: A liquid asset is one that can be converted easily and rapidly into cash without a substantial loss of value. In the money market, a security is said to be liquid if the spread between the bid and asked prices is narrow and a reasonable size can be done at those quotes.

LOCAL GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT POOL (LGIP): The aggregate of all funds from political subdivisions that are placed in the custody of the State Treasurer for investment and reinvestment.

MARKET VALUE: The price at which a security is trading and could presumably be purchased or sold.

MATURITY: The date upon which the principal or stated value of an investment becomes due and payable.

MONEY MARKET: The market in which short-term debt instruments (bills, commercial paper, bankers’ acceptances, etc.) are issued and traded.

NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED STATISTICAL RATING ORGANIZATION (“NRSRO”):

Firms that review and assess the creditworthiness of an obligor as an entity or with respect to specific securities or money market instruments and express their opinion in the form of a letter rating. A credit rating agency may apply to the SEC fore registration as a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (“NRSRO”). The primary rating agencies are Standard & Poor’s Corporation, Moody’s Investor Services, Inc. and Fitch, Inc.

NEGOTIABLE CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT: Generally, short-term debt instruments that usually pays interest and is used by a bank, savings or federal association, state or federal credit union, or state-licensed branch of a foreign bank. Negotiable CDs are traded in a secondary market and are payable upon order to the bearer or initial depositor (investor). Negotiable CDs are insured by FDIC up to $250,000, but they are Exhibit A
Packet Page. 508
not collateralized beyond that amount.

NON-NEGOTIABLE CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT: CDs that carry a penalty if redeemed prior to maturity. Non-negotiable CDs issued by banks and savings and loans are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to the amount of $250,000, including principal and interest. Amounts deposited above this amount may be secured with other forms of collateral through an agreement between the investor and issuer. Collateral may include other securities including Treasuries or agency securities such as those issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association.

PORTFOLIO: Collection of securities held by an investor.

PRIMARY DEALER: A group of government securities dealers who submit daily reports of market activity and positions and monthly financials statements to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and are subject to its informal oversight. Primary dealers include Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)-registered securities brokers/dealers, banks and a few unregulated firms.

PRUDENT PERSON RULE: An investment standard. In some states, the law requires that a fiduciary, such as a trustee, may invest money only in a list of securities selected by the custody state – the so-called “legal list”. In other states, the trustee may invest in a security if it is one that would be bought by a prudent person of discretion and intelligence who is seeking a reasonable income and preservation of capital.

RATE OF RETURN: The yield obtainable on a security based on its purchase price or its current market price. This may be the amortized yield to maturity; on a bond, the current income return.

SAFEKEEPING: The service provided by banks and trust companies for clients when the bank or trust company stores the securities, takes in coupon payments, and redeems issues at maturity.

SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION: Agency created by Congress to protected investors in securities transactions by administrating securities legislation.

SEC RULE 15c3-1: See “Uniform Net Capital Rule”.

SUPRANATIONAL SECURITIES: United States dollar denominated senior unsecured unsubordinated obligations issued or unconditionally guaranteed by the International Exhibit A
Packet Page. 509
Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), International Finance Corporate (IFC), or Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), with a maximum remaining maturity of five years or less, and eligible for purchase and sale within the United States.

Investments under this subdivision shall be rated “AA” or better by an NRSRO and shall not exceed 10 percent of the agency’s moneys that may be invested pursuant to this section.

TREASURY BILLS: A non-interest bearing discount security issued by the U.S.

Treasury to finance the national debt. Most bills are issued to mature in three months, six months, or one year.

TREASURY BOND: Long-term U.S. Treasury securities having initial maturities of more than 10 years.

TREASURY NOTES: Intermediate-term coupon bearing U.S. Treasury having initial maturities from one year to ten years.

UNIFORM NET CAPITAL RULE: Securities and Exchange Commission requirement that member firms as well as nonmember broker/dealers in securities maintain a maximum ratio of indebtedness to liquid capital of 15 to 1; also called the net capital rule and net capital ratio. Indebtedness covers all money owed to a firm, including margin loans and commitments to purchase securities, one reason new public issues are spread among members of underwriting syndicates. Liquid capital includes cash and assets easily converted into cash.

WEIGHTED-AVERAGE-LIFE (WAL): Measures the average length of time for anticipated principal repayments to measure a bond's risk and liquidity. In order to calculate a bond's WAL, assumptions must be made regarding prepayment event probabilities, prepayment amounts, prepayment speed, underlying asset leverage, and other collateral features as well as macroeconomic drivers such as, but not limited to, interest rate expectations, home prices, and mortgage rates. Institutionally, proprietary models use these various assumed inputs to estimate the amount and timing of principal repayments in order to produce a WAL output that functions as a useful metric to understand interest rate risk, prepayment risk, and extension risk.

YIELD: The rate of annual income return on an investment, expressed as a percentage. (a) Income Yield is obtained by dividing the current dollar income by the current market price for the security. (b) Net Yield or Yield to Maturity is the current income yield minus any premium above par or plus any discount from par in purchase price, with the adjustment spread over the period from the date of purchase to the date Exhibit A
Packet Page. 510
of maturity of the bond.

Exhibit A
Packet Page. 511

CITY OF

SAN BERNARDINO

INVESTMENT POLICY
Fiscal Year 2026/27
Proposed June 17, 2026
Jeannie Fortune Tarik Rahmani
Interim Director of Finance & Management Services
Exhibit A
Packet Page. 512
I. PURPOSE
To establish guidelines for the prudent investment of public funds in a manner that will protect City funds, meet daily cash flow expenditures, and comply with all federal, state, and local laws and ordinances governing the investment of public funds.

2. Responsibilities of the Director of Finance
The Director of Finance is appointed by and serves at the pleasure of the City Manager and is subject to his/her direction and supervision. The Director of Finance is charged with responsibility for the conduct of all Finance Department operations. The City Charter places the "City Exhibit A
Packet Page. 513
Treasurer" responsibilities amongst the duties of the Director of Finance.

Exhibit A
Packet Page. 514
The "Prudent Investor Rule" provides, pursuant to California Government Code Section 53600.3, that investments shall be made with judgment and care-under circumstances then prevailing - which persons of prudence, discretion and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived. The Director of Finance and any designee of the Director of Finance, as investment officers acting in accordance with written
procedures and the investment policy and exercising due diligence, shall be relieved of personal responsibility for any individual security's credit risk or market price changes, provided deviations from expectations are reported to the City Council in a timely fashion and appropriate action is taken to control adverse developments.
(C) Ethics and Conflicts of Interest
In addition to state and local statutes relating to conflicts of interest, all persons involved in the investment process shall refrain from personal business activity that conflicts with proper execution of the investment program or impairs their ability to make impartial investment decisions. Employees and investment officers are required to annually file applicable financial disclosures as required for “public officials who manage public investments” by the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) and are subject to California law relative to conflicts of interest.
(D) Level of Investment
The City strives to maintain the level of investment of all investable cash as near to 100 percent as possible through current and projected cash flow management.

Safety, liquidity, and yield are defined as follows:

2. Liquidity. The investment portfolio shall remain sufficiently liquid to meet operating requirements that may be reasonably anticipated. This is accomplished by structuring the portfolio so that securities mature Exhibit A
Packet Page. 515
concurrent with cash needs to meet anticipated demands.

3. Yield. The investment portfolio shall be designed with the objective of attaining a market rate of return, taking into account the investment risk constraints and liquidity needs. Return on investment is of secondary importance compared to the safety and liquidity objectives described above.
(F) Allowable Investments
The investments listed in this Policy are authorized investments pursuant to Sections 53601 and 53635 of the California Government Code and are authorized investments for the City subject, however, to the restrictions set forth in Section "K" of this Investment Policy. In the event that an apparent discrepancy is found between this Policy and the Government Code, the more restrictive parameters will take precedence.
(G) Collateralization
If collateral is required for a particular investment type, it will be provided in compliance with California Government Code requirements. (H) Investment Pools/Mutual Funds
Prior to investing in any pooled investment program (e.g., LAIF, money market funds), the Director of Finance will review the program's documentation (e.g., investment policy, policies for participation, fees) to determine the appropriateness of the pool for City funds. Whenever the City has funds invested in a pooled investment program, the Director of Finance should periodically review the pool's investment holdings. The review shall, at a minimum, obtain the following information:
 A description of eligible investment securities, and a written statement of investment policy and objectives.
 A description of interest calculations and how it is distributed, and how gains and losses are treated.
 A description of how the securities are safeguarded (including the settlement processes), and how often the securities are priced and the program audited.
 A description of who may invest in the program, how often, and what size of deposits and withdrawals are allowed.
 A schedule for receiving statements and portfolio listings.  A description of how the pool/fund utilizes reserves, retained earnings, etc.
 A fee schedule, including when and how fees are assessed.  The eligibility of the pool/fund to invest in bond proceeds and special district funds, and a description of its practices.
(I) Diversification
Exhibit A
Packet Page. 516
The City shall diversify the investments within the portfolio to avoid incurring unreasonable risks inherent in over-investing in specific instruments, individual financial institutions, or maturities. To promote diversification, unless a more restrictive limit applies, no more than 5% 10% of the portfolio may be invested in the securities of any one issuer, regardless of security type; excluding U.S.

4. Municipal Bonds. Registered state warrants or treasury notes or bonds of this state, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue-producing property owned, controlled, or operated by the state or Exhibit A
Packet Page. 517
by a department, board, agency, or authority of the state.

Exhibit A
Packet Page. 518

2. The entity meets the following criteria: (A) is organized within the United States as a special purpose corporation, trust, or limited liability company, (B) Has program-wide credit enhancements including but not limited to, overcollateralization, letters of credit, or a surety bond, and (C) Has commercial paper that is rated “A-1” or better, or the equivalent, by an NRSRO.

Purchases are limited to securities that have a maximum maturity of 270 397 days. A maximum of 25% of the City’s portfolio may be invested in this category with a maximum of 5% 10% per issuer.

10. Supranational Obligations. United States dollar denominated senior unsecured unsubordinated obligations issued or unconditionally guaranteed by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, International Finance Corporation, or Inter-American Development Bank, with a maximum remaining maturity of five years or less, and eligible for purchase and sale within the United States. Investments under this subdivision shall be rated in a rating category of "AA" or its equivalent or better by a NRSRO. A maximum of 10% 30% of the City's portfolio may be invested in this category with a maximum of 5% 10% per issuer. State law limits the percentage to 30% of the portfolio.

11. Bankers Acceptances. Bankers’ acceptances are short-term debt instruments issued by a company that is guaranteed by a commercial bank.

Banker Acceptances are limited to institutions with short-term debt obligations of A-1 or higher and have long term debt obligations rated “A” or higher, or the equivalent, by an NRSRO. The maturity shall not exceed 180 days and no more than 30% 40% of the total portfolio may be invested in Bankers’ Acceptances and no more than 5% per issuer.

Exhibit A
Packet Page. 519

13. Asset-Backed, Mortgage-Backed, Mortgage Pass-Through securities and Collateralized Mortgage Obligations. A mortgage passthrough security, collateralized mortgage obligation, mortgagebacked or other pay-through bond, equipment lease-backed certificate, consumer receivable passthrough certificate, or consumer receivablebacked bond with a maximum remaining maturity of five years or less as measured by Weighted-Average Life (WAL). Securities shall be rated in a rating category of “AA” or its equivalent or better by an NRSRO. No more than 20 percent of the market value of the City's investment portfolio shall be invested in this category. A maximum of 20% of the City’s portfolio may be invested in the category.

Exhibit A
Packet Page. 520
City of San Bernardino Authorized Investment Policy StTable Investment Type Maximum Term
Maximum % of
Portfolio Maximum per Issuer Minimum Rating
US Treasury Obligations 5 Years NONE NONE NONE
Local Agency Investment
Fund (LAIF) N/A
The City may invest up
to the maximum
amount permitted by
California state law
($75 million). N/A NONE
Joint Powers/Local
Government Investment
Pool

N/A NONE N/A NONE
Municipal Debt 5 Years 30% NONE A1, A
Federal Agency
Obligations
5 years (MBS/ABS
maturities
measured by
Weighted-AverageLife)

NONE NONE NONE
Certificate of Deposits 5 Years 30% $250K
Securites in this
category shall be
limited to the
maximum amount
covered by federal
deposit insurance.

Commercial Paper 270 397 days 25% 5% 10% A1/P1, A
Medium Term/Corporate
Notes
5 Years 30% 10% A
Money Market Mutual
Funds N/A 20% NONE AAA
Supranational
Obligations
(IBRD, IFC, IDB)
5 Years 30% 10% AA
Bankers' Acceptances 180 Days 30% 40% 5% A1, A
Asset-Backed, MortgageBacked, Mortgage PassThrough Securities and Collateralized Mortgage
Obligations
5 years as
measured by
Weighted-AverageLife
20% NONE AA
Exhibit A
Packet Page. 521
(L) Prohibited Investments
Furthermore, the City will not invest in inverse floaters, range notes, interestonly strips, or any security that could result in zero interest accrual if held to maturity. In order to anticipate market changes and provide a level of security for all funds, the collateralization level will 100% of market value for Certificate of Deposits and 102% for reverse purchase agreements or principal and accrued interest. Collateral will always be held by an independent third party with whom the entity has a current custodial relationship
(M) Performance Standards
The investment portfolio shall be managed with the objective of obtaining a market-average rate of return during budgetary and economic cycles, considering the City's investment risk constraints and the cash flow needs.

The report will include the following elements:
 Type of investment
 Institution/Issuer
 Purchase Date
 Date of maturity
Exhibit A
Packet Page. 522
 Amount of deposit or cost of the investment
 Face value of the investment
 Current market value of securities and source of valuation  Rate of interest
 Interest earnings
 Statement relating the report to its compliance with the Statement of Investment Policy or the manner in which the portfolio is not in compliance
 Statement on availability of funds to meet the next six months’ obligations  Percentage of Portfolio by Investment Type
 Days to Maturity for all Investments
 Comparative report on Monthly Investment Balances & Interest Yields  Monthly transactions
The Investment Advisor shall report to the City, on a monthly basis, the weightedaverage-life for each structured security to ensure compliance with the individual 5-year weighted-average-life limitation. Measures the average length of time for anticipated principal repayments to measure a bond's risk and liquidity. In order to calculate a bond's WAL, assumptions must be made regarding prepayment event probabilities, prepayment amounts, prepayment speed, underlying asset leverage, and other collateral features as well as macroeconomic drivers such as, but not limited to, interest rate expectations, home prices, and mortgage rates. Institutionally, proprietary models use these various assumed inputs to estimate the amount and timing of principal repayments in order to produce a WAL output that functions as a useful metric to understand interest rate risk, prepayment risk, and extension risk.

Notwithstanding the aforementioned process, any security with a weightedaverage-life greater than 4 years shall be monitored on a monthly basis to note any reporting trends.
(O) Portfolio Review
The Director of Finance shall continually monitor portfolio performance to ensure that the securities in the portfolio are in compliance with this Policy. The Director of Finance shall report any issues of material non-compliance in the next monthly Investment Report. Percentage holding limits and diversification requirements listed in this Policy apply at the time a security is purchased. If a percentage holding limit or diversification requirement is exceeded due to Exhibit A
Packet Page. 523
a subsequent change in the portfolio, it is not a compliance violation, but no additional securities may be purchased in that category or for that issuer until the holdings are back under the Policy limits. Credit ratings, where shown, specify the minimum credit rating category required at purchase. In the event a security held by the City is subject to a credit rating change that brings it below the minimum credit ratings specified in this Policy, the Director of Finance will notify the City Council of the change in the next monthly Investment Report. The course of action to be followed will then be decided on a case-by-case basis, considering such factors as the reason for the change, prognosis for recovery or further rating downgrades, and the market price of the security. If a security is determined to be out of compliance with this Policy due to a subsequent change in this Policy or the Government Code, it may be held to maturity unless there is a requirement that the security be sold. (P) Debt Proceeds
Debt proceeds and bond reserve funds are to be invested in accordance with their respective bond indenture. If the indenture is silent as to the permitted investments, the bond proceeds will be invested in the securities permitted by this Policy. Notwithstanding the other provisions of this Policy, the percentage limitations listed elsewhere in this Policy do not apply to bond proceeds and bond proceeds may be invested beyond five years if the maturities of such investments do not exceed the expected use of the funds, the investments are deemed prudent in the opinion of the Director of Finance, and the investments are not prohibited by the applicable bond documents. Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes or other temporary financing proceeds shall not be invested for a term that exceeds the term of the debt.
(Q) Safe Keeping
To protect against potential losses by collapse of individual securities dealers, all deliverable securities owned by the City, including collateral on repurchase agreements, shall be held in safekeeping by a third party bank trust department acting as agent for the City under the terms of a custody agreement executed by the bank and by the City. All deliverable securities will be received and delivered using standard delivery-versus-payment procedures.
(R) Qualified Financial Institutions and Broker/Dealers The Director of Finance shall maintain a list of approved financial institutions authorized to provide investment related services to the City. In addition, the City shall maintain a list of approved security broker/dealers selected by conducting a process of due diligence. These may include 'primary' dealers or regional dealers that qualify under Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") Rule 15C3- 1 (uniform net capital rule). A copy of this Investment Policy shall be sent Exhibit A
Packet Page. 524
annually to all firms with which the City executes investments.

Additionally, all financial institutions and broker/dealers who desire to become qualified bidders of investment transactions must provide the Director of Finance with the following:
 Audited Financial Statements
 Proof of State Registration
 Copy of most recently filed Financial Industry Regulated Authority (FINRA) documentation
 Certification of having read the Investment Policy and depository contracts of the City of San Bernardino
The Director of Finance will review the existing list of either qualified broker/dealers or qualified bidders for investment transactions on an annual basis. At the discretion of the Director of Finance, and with the due diligence noted above, add or delete either broker/dealers or qualified bidders. (S) Continuing Education and Training
To ensure the highest level of professional standards for the execution of the investment program, investment staff responsible for the day-to-day management of the portfolio are encouraged to engage in continuing education in the areas of cash and investment management.

Exhibit A
Packet Page. 525

CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT (CD): A time deposit with a specific maturity evidenced by a certificate. Large-denomination CD's are typically negotiable.

COLLATERAL: Securities, evidence of deposit or other property, which a borrower pledges to secure repayment of a loan. Also refers to securities pledged by a bank to secure deposits of public monies.

COUPON: a) The annual interest that a bond’s issuer promises to pay the bondholder on the bond’s face value. b) A certificate attached to a bond evidencing interest due on a payment date.

DEALER: A dealer, as opposed to a broker, acts as a principal in all transactions; buying and selling for his/her own account.

DIVERSIFICATION: Dividing investment funds among a variety of securities offering Exhibit A
Packet Page. 526
independent returns.

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION (FDIC): A Federal agency that insures bank deposits, currently up to $250,00 per deposit.

LOCAL GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT POOL (LGIP): The aggregate of all funds from political subdivisions that are placed in the custody of the State Treasurer for investment and reinvestment.

MARKET VALUE: The price at which a security is trading and could presumably be purchased or sold.

MATURITY: The date upon which the principal or stated value of an investment becomes due and payable.

MONEY MARKET: The market in which short-term debt instruments (bills, commercial paper, bankers’ acceptances, etc.) are issued and traded.

NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED STATISTICAL RATING ORGANIZATION (“NRSRO”):

PORTFOLIO: Collection of securities held by an investor.

RATE OF RETURN: The yield obtainable on a security based on its purchase price or its current market price. This may be the amortized yield to maturity; on a bond, the current income return.

SAFEKEEPING: The service provided by banks and trust companies for clients when the bank or trust company stores the securities, takes in coupon payments, and redeems issues at maturity.

SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION: Agency created by Congress to protected investors in securities transactions by administrating securities legislation.

SEC RULE 15c3-1: See “Uniform Net Capital Rule”.

SUPRANATIONAL SECURITIES: United States dollar denominated senior unsecured unsubordinated obligations issued or unconditionally guaranteed by the International Exhibit A
Packet Page. 528
Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), International Finance Corporate (IFC), or Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), with a maximum remaining maturity of five years or less, and eligible for purchase and sale within the United States.

Investments under this subdivision shall be rated “AA” or better by an NRSRO and shall not exceed 10 percent of the agency’s moneys that may be invested pursuant to this section.

TREASURY BILLS: A non-interest bearing discount security issued by the U.S.

Treasury to finance the national debt. Most bills are issued to mature in three months, six months, or one year.

TREASURY BOND: Long-term U.S. Treasury securities having initial maturities of more than 10 years.

TREASURY NOTES: Intermediate-term coupon bearing U.S. Treasury having initial maturities from one year to ten years.

Exhibit A
Packet Page. 530
“Attachment 1”
City of San Bernardino
General Fund Reserve Policy
Adopted November 21, 2018
I. PURPOSE
To 1) provide a framework for the allocation of available General Fund resources to various categories of budget reserves and 2) provide guidelines under which these reserves may be utilized for operating or capital purposes with approval by the Mayor and City Council.

II. BACKGROUND
Maintenance of sufficient budget reserves is a central component of sound financial management practices. Reserves are designed to set aside funding today for future liabilities, capital projects and capital purchases; assist in maintaining stable service levels in times of declining revenues and/or unanticipated operating expenditures; and facilitate the continuation of services in the event of natural disasters or fiscal emergencies.

The City of San Bernardino annually adopts an operating budget that allocates resources to City departments for the provision of services to the public. To determine the amount of funds available for appropriation, City management develops a revenue projection and notes the available reserve balance from the prior fiscal year. Proposed expenditures are then matched against these available resources. If proposed expenditures exceed projected revenue, utilization of available reserves may be used to meet the proposed level of spending thus decreasing the available reserve. When projected revenue exceeds proposed expenditures, the surplus increases the opening balance of available reserves if the budget is not amended to use these surplus funds. The City also has known capital needs that include facilities, equipment, vehicle, and infrastructure replacement. This policy’s goal is to ensure that sufficient resources exist to address these anticipated needs, as well as unanticipated needs that may arise on an infrequent basis.

Packet Page. 531
III. POLICY

1. General Fund Operating Reserve: It shall be the policy of the City of San Bernardino to maintain a General Fund operating reserve equal to 25% of General Fund budget appropriations. This reserve is to be further broken down as follows:

A. An Emergency Reserve of 15% - This reserve account is established for the purpose of addressing any extremely unusual and infrequent occurrences, such as a major natural disaster or a major unforeseen legal settlement or judgment. Utilization of the Emergency Reserve may only occur after the declaration of an emergency by a majority of the City Council. Following the resolution of the emergency, staff must present a plan to the Mayor and City Council to return the Emergency Reserve to the 15% minimum level as quickly as is practicable given the unique circumstances and requirements of each emergency.

B. An Economic Contingency Reserve of 10% - This reserve account is established for the purpose of providing a mechanism to allow for a measured and thoughtful reduction in expenditures during times of economic downturn. Utilization of the Economic Contingency Reserve requires approval by a majority of the City Council. When it is determined that the economic downturn has ended and the City’s financial condition is improving, staff is required to present a plan to the Mayor and City Council to return the economic contingency reserve to the 10% minimum level over a period of no more than five years.

If the General Fund operating reserve exceeds 30% of General Fund budget appropriations, staff is required to present a plan to the Mayor and City Council to utilize excess funds consistent with its adopted Goals and Objectives to a point that the balance is again consistent with the policy.

Uses could include accelerating funding into the special reserves noted below in this policy; capital projects, vehicle, or equipment purchases not originally planned for the current fiscal year; early repayment of outstanding debt obligations; or other expenditures of a one-time nature.

If an action of the City Council for a reason other than those described above reduces the General Fund operating reserve balance below the 25% level required by this policy, staff must include an allocation to reserves in the Packet Page. 532
following budget cycle sufficient to restore the reserve balance to the 25% minimum balance required by this policy.

2. General Fund Special Reserves: It shall be the policy of the City of San Bernardino to establish General Fund special reserves to provide funding for future anticipated liabilities and capital needs. These reserves shall be segregated into the following four accounts:

A. Risk Management Reserve – This reserve account is established to fund anticipated liabilities associated with general liability and workers’ compensation claims against the City. Its balance will be initially determined, and thereafter adjusted, based on the balance of available reserve funds after meeting the General Fund Operating Reserve requirement and then giving consideration to both the outstanding balance of claims as well as to the anticipated timing of claim payments.

B. City Facilities Reserve – This reserve account is established to fund the cost of replacing city buildings and park facilities. Its balance will be initially determined, and thereafter adjusted, based on the balance of available reserve funds after meeting the General Fund Operating Reserve requirement and then giving consideration to the facilities needs analysis maintained by the Public Works department.

C. Vehicles and Equipment Reserve – This reserve account is established to fund the cost of replacing General Fund-funded city vehicles and major equipment (including technology equipment). Its balance will be initially determined, and thereafter adjusted, based on the balance of available reserve funds after meeting the General Fund Operating Reserve requirement and then giving consideration to the vehicle and equipment assessment needs analyses maintained by the Fleet division and the Information Technology department.

D. Infrastructure Reserve – This reserve account is established to provide additional funding for the cost of replacing city infrastructure such as roads, sidewalks, and storm drains. These funds are to supplement dedicated non-General Fund revenue streams and competitive grants that also fund these types of projects. These funds may also provide for the match requirement on a grant when other resources are not available. No specific balance target is spelled out by this policy, but the reserve is Packet Page. 533
established for the receipt of funds for this purposes when directed by the Mayor and City Council.

The goal for General Fund special reserves is to fund at a level sufficient to address anticipated requirements over a projected period of 30 years, subject to availability of funds and prioritization of funding between the four categories of special reserves by the Mayor and City Council. As a part of each annual budget presented to the Mayor and City Council, staff will update the balances for the four categories of special reserves and any anticipated utilization or additions to the General Fund special reserves.

IV. PROCEDURES
At the conclusion of each fiscal year and at each fiscal year’s mid-year budget update, the General Fund reserve levels shall be reviewed by staff and detailed to the Mayor and City Council. The City Manager shall make recommendations for additions to or disbursements from the reserve funds consistent with this policy.

Packet Page. 534
This space for filing stamp only
OR#:

O R A N G E C O U N T Y R E P O R T E R
~ SINCE 1921 ~
600 W. Santa Ana Blvd., Suite 205, Santa Ana, California 92701-4542 Telephone (714) 543-2027 / Fax (714) 542-6841

PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2015.5 C.C.P.)
State of California )
County of Orange ) ss
Notice Type:

Ad Description:

I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer and publisher of the ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER, a newspaper published in the English language in the City of Santa Ana, and adjudged a newspaper of general circulation as defined by the laws of the State of California by the Superior Court of the County of Orange, State of California, under date of June 2, 1922, Case No. 13,421. That the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit:

Executed on: 10/10/2004
At Riverside, California
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Signature

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUN
473 E CARNEGIE DR #200, SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408
(909) 889-9666 (909) 884-2536
SB 4042043
Vanessa Alvarado

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO/CITY CLERK - LEAD
201 N. E ST. BUILDING A
SAN BERNARDINO, CA - 92401

HRG - NOTICE OF HEARING

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SAN BERNARDINO MCC
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer and publisher of the SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUN, a newspaper published in the English language in the city of SAN BERNARDINO, county of SAN BERNARDINO, and adjudged a newspaper of general circulation as defined by the laws of the State of California by the Superior Court of the County of SAN BERNARDINO, State of California, under date 06/27/1952, Case No. 73081. That the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit:
06/07/2026
06/08/2026

SAN BERNARDINO
!A000007420811! Email

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SAN BERNARDINO
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that
the City of San Bernardino Mayor
and City Council will hold a public
meeting on (June 17, 2026) at 5:00
PM in the City Council Chambers in
the Norman F. Feldheym Central
Library at 555 West 6thStreet, San
Bernardino, California. Visit the
City's agenda portal at
www.sbcity.org to access more
meeting information.

The purpose of the hearing is to
consider the following:
• Adoption the City Manager's
Proposed Fiscal Year 2026/27
Operating Budget
• Adoption of the Fiscal Year 2027-
2031 Capital Improvement Plan
(CIP)
• Establishment of the City's
Fiscal Year 2026/27 Appropriations
Limit as required by Article XIIIB
of the California Constitution and
Government Code § 7910
Notice is further given that
members of the public who wish to
comment on the public hearing you
may participate in the following
ways: 1) comments and contact
information can be emailed to
[email protected] by
2:30 P.M. the day of the scheduled
meeting; 2) attending the meeting in
person and providing your public
comment in person, not to exceed
three minutes.

If you challenge the matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else
raised at the public meeting
described in this notice or written
correspondence delivered to the City
Clerk at or prior to the public
meeting.

The City endeavors to be in total
compliance with the Americans with
Disabilities Act. If you require
assistance or auxiliary aids to
participate in the meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Office as far in advance of the meeting as possible. Additional information concerning the above matter may be obtained
from, and written comments should
be addressed to, San Bernardino
City Clerk, 290 North "D" Street, San
Bernardino, California 92401.

Telicia Lopez, CMC
City Clerk
DATED: June 17, 2026
6/7/26
SBS-4042043#
Packet Page. 535
This space for filing stamp only
OR#:

O R A N G E C O U N T Y R E P O R T E R
~ SINCE 1921 ~
600 W. Santa Ana Blvd., Suite 205, Santa Ana, California 92701-4542 Telephone (714) 543-2027 / Fax (714) 542-6841

PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2015.5 C.C.P.)
State of California )
County of Orange ) ss
Notice Type:

Ad Description:

Executed on: 10/10/2004
At Riverside, California
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Signature

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUN
473 E CARNEGIE DR #200, SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408
(909) 889-9666 (909) 884-2536
SB 4042049
Vanessa Alvarado

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO/CITY CLERK - LEAD
201 N. E ST. BUILDING A
SAN BERNARDINO, CA - 92401

HRG - NOTICE OF HEARING

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SAN BERNARDINO
!A000007420809! Email
AVISO DE AUDIENCIA PÚBLICA

CONCEJO MUNICIPAL DE LA

CIUDAD DE SAN BERNARDINO

POR MEDIO DEL PRESENTE SE
NOTIFICA que el Alcalde y el
Concejo Municipal de la Ciudad de
San Bernardino celebrarán una reunión pública el 17 de junio de 2026 a las 5:00 PM en la Sala del Concejo
Municipal ubicada en la Biblioteca Central Norman F. Feldheym, en 555 West 6th Street, San Bernardino,
California. Visite el portal de
agendas de la Ciudad en
www.sbcity.org para obtener más
información.

El propósito de la audiencia es
recibir comentarios y considerar lo siguiente:
- Aprobación del Presupuesto
Operativo Propuesto por el
Administrador de la Ciudad para el Año Fiscal 2026/27
- Aprobación del Plan de Mejoras
de Capital (CIP) para los Años
Fiscales 2027-2031
- Establecimiento del Límite de
Apropiaciones de la Ciudad para el
Año Fiscal 2026/27, conforme al
Artículo XIIIB de la Constitución
de California y el Código de
Gobierno § 7910
También se informa que los miembros del público que deseen comentar en la audiencia pública
pueden participar de las siguientes maneras:

1. Enviando sus comentarios e
información de contacto por
correo electrónico a
[email protected]
antes de las 2:30 P.M. del día
programado para la reunión, o;

2. Asistiendo en persona a la reunión
y proporcionando su comentario
público directamente. Por favor, consulte la agenda para obtener información adicional. La Ciudad se esfuerza por cumplir plenamente con la Ley de
Estadounidenses con
Discapacidades (ADA). Si necesita
asistencia o dispositivos auxiliares
para participar en la reunión, o si
requiere un intérprete, comuníquese
con la Oficina del Secretario
Municipal con la mayor antelación posible.

Un resumen general del presupuesto
estará disponible para consulta pública en el sitio web de la ciudad:
https://casanbernardino.civicplus.com/195/Bu dget-Books. Para obtener información adicional sobre este tema, o para enviar comentarios por
escrito, diríjase a: City Clerk, City of San Bernardino, 290 North "D" Street, San Bernardino, California 92401.

Packet Page. 536
Telicia Lopez, CMC
Secretaria Municipal Interina
FECHA: 17 de junio de 2026
6/4/26
SBS-4042049#
Packet Page. 537
City of San Bernardino - Citywide Salary Schedule
Effective July 6, 2026
CLASS
CODE

CLASSIFICATION TITLE FLSA STATUS UNIT
SALARY
RANGE

BOTTOM STEP
(Step 1)

TOP STEP
(Step 21)
Monthly/
Hourly

MANAGEMENT & CONFIDENTIAL
10012 ACCOUNTANT II - PAYROLL NON-EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 485 $ 5,930.52 $ Monthly 7,208.91 10508 ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST I FLEX (U) EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 496 $ 6,264.69 $ 7,614.42 Monthly 10510 ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST II (U) EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 526 $ 7,275.50 $ 8,844.05 Monthly 10081 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT TO CITY COUNCIL (U) NON-EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 464 $ 5,340.68 $ 6,491.82 Monthly 10094 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER (U) EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 430 $ 4,508.25 $ 5,478.63 Monthly 10092 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT TO THE MAYOR I (U) NON-EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 410 $ 4,080.13 $ 4,958.95 Monthly 10093 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT TO THE MAYOR II (U) NON-EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 430 $ 4,508.25 $ 5,478.63 Monthly 10534 ADMINISTRATIVE CLAIMS SPECIALIST NON-EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 420 $ 4,288.24 $ 5,212.25 Monthly 10042 AUDITOR I EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 515 $ 6,887.82 $ 8,371.94 Monthly 10043 AUDITOR II EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 537 $ 7,685.78 $ 9,342.33 Monthly 10135 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) COORDINATOR NON-EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 482 $ 5,842.53 $ 7,101.89 Monthly 10072 COUNCIL ADMINISTRATIVE SUPERVISOR (U) EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 506 $ 6,585.77 $ 8,004.48 Monthly 10650 DEPUTY CITY CLERK I (U) EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 490 $ 6,080.36 $ 7,263.74 Monthly 10120 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 500 $ 6,390.74 $ 7,634.23 Monthly 10707 EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT (U) NON-EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 430 $ 4,508.25 $ 5,478.63 Monthly 10982 EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO DIRECTOR (U) EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 464 $ 5,340.68 $ 6,491.82 Monthly 10978 EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO MAYOR (U) EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 502 $ 6,454.96 $ 7,846.32 Monthly 10976 EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER (U) EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 502 $ 6,454.96 $ 7,846.32 Monthly 10624 GIS ADMINISTRATOR EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 580 $ 9,525.46 $ 11,578.02 Monthly 10623 GIS ANALYST EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 483 $ 5,871.07 $ 7,136.37 Monthly 10778 GRANT WRITER NON-EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 506 $ 6,585.77 $ 8,004.48 Monthly 10683 HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST I EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 500 $ 6,390.74 $ 7,767.83 Monthly 10684 HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST II EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 518 $ 6,991.28 $ 8,498.00 Monthly 10682 HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST TRAINEE NON-EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 476 $ 5,670.09 $ 6,892.59 Monthly 10673 HUMAN RESOURCES GENERALIST NON-EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 490 $ 6,080.36 $ 7,390.86 Monthly 10627 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ANALYST I (FLEX) EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 498 $ 6,327.71 $ 7,691.72 Monthly 10626 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ANALYST II EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 520 $ 7,061.45 $ 8,583.62 Monthly 10388 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TECHNICIAN I (FLEX) NON-EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 430 $ 4,508.25 $ 5,478.63 Monthly 10389 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TECHNICIAN II NON-EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 460 $ 5,234.84 $ 6,363.39 Monthly 10319 LEGAL ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (U) NON-EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 497 $ 6,295.61 $ 7,652.48 Monthly 10516 MARKETING & MEDIA SPECIALIST EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 476 $ 5,670.09 $ 6,892.59 Monthly 10528 NETWORK SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATOR EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 566 $ 8,882.10 $ 10,796.71 Monthly 10122 OMBUDSPERSON EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 518 $ 6,991.28 $ 8,498.00 Monthly 10068 PAYROLL TECHNICIAN NON- EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 430 $ 4,508.25 $ 5,478.63 Monthly 10259 RECORDS MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST (U) EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 460 $ 5,234.84 $ 6,363.39 Monthly 10538 SAFETY OFFICER EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 530 $ 7,422.97 $ 9,022.44 Monthly 10222 SENIOR CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE (U) NON-EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 435 $ 4,621.22 $ 5,617.76 Monthly 10632 SENIOR GIS ANALYST EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 530 $ 7,422.97 $ 9,022.44 Monthly 10656 SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES TECHNICIAN NON-EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 461 $ 5,261.00 $ 6,395.50 Monthly 10622 SENIOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ANALYST EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 553 $ 8,324.37 $ 10,118.87 Monthly City of San Bernardino - Citywide Salary Schedule
Version Date: 6.9.2026
1 Exhibit B
Packet Page. 538
City of San Bernardino - Citywide Salary Schedule
Effective July 6, 2026
CLASS
CODE

CLASSIFICATION TITLE FLSA STATUS UNIT
SALARY
RANGE

BOTTOM STEP
(Step 1)

TOP STEP
(Step 21)
Monthly/
Hourly
10385 SENIOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TECHNICIAN EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 488 $ 6,019.71 $ 7,317.13 Monthly 10529 SENIOR NETWORK SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATOR EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 592 $ 10,112.92 $ 12,291.53 Monthly 10223 SENIOR OFFICE ASSISTANT (U) NON-EXEMPT CONFIDENTIAL 375 $ 3,426.08 $ 4,164.57 Monthly 10860 ACCOUNTING DIVISION MANAGER (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 608 $ 10,952.50 $ 13,313.05 Monthly 10979 ADMINISTRATIVE SUPERVISOR & EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 535 $ 7,609.67 $ 9,249.57 Monthly 10492 ASSISTANT BUILDING OFFICIAL EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 583 $ 9,668.16 $ 11,751.64 Monthly 10216 ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 580 $ 9,525.46 $ 11,578.02 Monthly 10104 ASSISTANT TO THE MAYOR I (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 430 $ 4,508.25 $ 5,478.63 Monthly 10105 ASSISTANT TO THE MAYOR II (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 480 $ 5,784.25 $ 7,030.53 Monthly 10106 ASSISTANT TO THE MAYOR III (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 530 $ 7,422.97 $ 9,022.44 Monthly 10107 ASSISTANT TO THE MAYOR IV (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 580 $ 9,525.46 $ 11,578.02 Monthly 10060 BUDGET DIVISION MANAGER (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 608 $ 10,952.50 $ 13,313.05 Monthly 10062 BUDGET OFFICER EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 581 $ 9,573.03 $ 11,635.10 Monthly 10500 BUILDING OFFICIAL (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 613 $ 11,229.58 $ 13,648.41 Monthly 10870 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT MANAGER EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 591 $ 10,061.79 $ 12,230.89 Monthly 10398 CHIEF DEPUTY CITY CLERK (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 565 $ 8,838.11 $ 10,743.20 Monthly 10801 CITY PLANNER (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 629 $ 12,161.91 $ 14,782.90 Monthly 10495 CIVIL ENGINEERING DIVISION MANAGER (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 620 $ 11,627.96 $ 14,133.60 Monthly 10273 CODE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION MANAGER (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 563 $ 8,750.10 $ 10,636.17 Monthly 10100 COMMUNITY INTERVENTION PROGRAM MANAGER (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 600 $ 10,524.39 $ 12,792.18 Monthly 10654 DEPUTY CITY CLERK II (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 530 $ 7,422.97 $ 9,022.44 Monthly 10675 DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF ANIMAL SERVICES (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 619 $ 11,569.69 $ 14,063.44 Monthly 10124 DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 629 $ 12,161.91 $ 14,782.90 Monthly 10066 DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE & MANAGEMENT SERVICES (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 629 $ 12,161.91 $ 14,782.90 Monthly 10720 DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF HOUSING AND HOMELESSNESS (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 629 $ 11,394.97 $ 13,850.89 Monthly 10610 DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES & RISK MANAGEMENT (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 629 $ 12,161.91 $ 14,782.90 Monthly 10638 DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 629 $ 12,161.91 $ 14,782.90 Monthly 10830 DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 629 $ 12,161.91 $ 14,782.90 Monthly 10732 DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PARKS/REC/COMM SVCS (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 629 $ 12,161.91 $ 14,782.90 Monthly 10803 DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 678 $ 15,528.53 $ 18,874.93 Monthly 10802 DEPUTY DIRECTOR/CITY PLANNER (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 662 $ 14,338.14 $ 17,427.67 Monthly 10400 DEPUTY LIBRARY DIRECTOR (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 575 $ 9,290.00 $ 11,292.61 Monthly 10140 DIVERSITY, EQUITY & INCLUSION OFFICER (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 590 $ 10,011.84 $ 12,170.24 Monthly 10125 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION MANAGER (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 600 $ 10,524.39 $ 12,792.18 Monthly 10119 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MANAGER (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 560 $ 8,620.48 $ 10,478.01 Monthly 10127 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECT MANAGER EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 560 $ 8,620.48 $ 10,478.01 Monthly 10367 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS MANAGER EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 565 $ 8,838.11 $ 10,743.20 Monthly 10180 ENGINEERING PROJECT MANAGER EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 590 $ 10,011.84 $ 12,170.24 Monthly 10200 ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING (ERP) PROJECT MANAGER EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 532 $ 7,496.70 $ 9,112.81 Monthly 10951 EXECUTIVE STAFF ASSISTANT TO CITY COUNCIL (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 550 $ 8,200.69 $ 9,969.04 Monthly 10939 FACILITIES & FLEET MAINTENANCE DIVISION MANAGER (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 591 $ 10,061.79 $ 12,230.89 Monthly 10512 FINANCIAL ANALYST EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 532 $ 7,496.70 $ 9,112.81 Monthly City of San Bernardino - Citywide Salary Schedule
Version Date: 6.9.2026
2 Exhibit B
Packet Page. 539
City of San Bernardino - Citywide Salary Schedule
Effective July 6, 2026
CLASS
CODE

CLASSIFICATION TITLE FLSA STATUS UNIT
SALARY
RANGE

BOTTOM STEP
(Step 1)

TOP STEP
(Step 21)
Monthly/
Hourly
10730 GRANT DIVISION MANAGER (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 601 $ 10,576.71 $ 12,856.40 Monthly 10698 HOMELESS OUTREACH COORDINATOR EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 532 $ 7,496.70 $ 9,112.81 Monthly 10700 HOMELESS SERVICES COORDINATOR EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 556 $ 8,450.43 $ 10,271.09 Monthly 10699 HOMELESS SOLUTIONS MANAGER (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 601 $ 10,576.71 $ 12,856.40 Monthly 10121 HOUSING COMPLIANCE SPECIALIST EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 500 $ 6,390.74 $ 7,767.83 Monthly 10129 HOUSING DIVISION MANAGER (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 601 $ 10,576.71 $ 12,856.40 Monthly 10672 HUMAN RESOURCES DIVISION MANAGER (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 590 $ 10,011.84 $ 12,170.24 Monthly 10637 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGER EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 599 $ 10,472.06 $ 12,727.97 Monthly 10159 LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 590 $ 10,011.84 $ 12,170.24 Monthly 10233 LEGISLATIVE & GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS MANAGER (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 593 $ 10,162.87 $ 12,353.38 Monthly 10401 LIBRARY DIRECTOR (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 635 $ 12,166.76 $ 14,787.60 Monthly 10530 MANAGEMENT ANALYST I (FLEX) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 476 $ 5,670.09 $ 6,892.59 Monthly 10531 MANAGEMENT ANALYST I (FLEX)(U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 476 $ 5,670.09 $ 6,892.59 Monthly 10533 MANAGEMENT ANALYST II (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 506 $ 6,585.77 $ 8,004.48 Monthly 10532 MANAGEMENT ANALYST II EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 506 $ 6,585.77 $ 8,004.48 Monthly 10503 MAYOR'S CHIEF OF STAFF (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 580 $ 9,525.46 $ 11,578.02 Monthly 10190 NEIGHBORHOOD & CUSTOMER SERVICE MANAGER (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 561 $ 8,663.30 $ 10,530.33 Monthly 10868 OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DIVISION MANAGER (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 591 $ 10,061.79 $ 12,230.89 Monthly 10064 PAYROLL SUPERVISOR EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 521 $ 7,097.12 $ 8,626.43 Monthly 10713 PLANNING DIVISION MANAGER (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 594 $ 10,214.01 $ 12,415.21 Monthly 10765 POLICE DISPATCH MANAGER EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 574 $ 9,243.62 $ 11,236.72 Monthly 10761 POLICE RECORDS MANAGER EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 574 $ 9,243.62 $ 11,236.72 Monthly 10509 PRINCIPAL ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 598 $ 10,419.74 $ 12,664.94 Monthly 10182 PRINCIPAL CIVIL ENGINEER EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 600 $ 10,524.39 $ 12,792.18 Monthly 10243 PRINCIPAL PLANNER EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 613 $ 11,229.58 $ 13,648.10 Monthly 10132 PROJECT MANAGER OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 550 $ 8,200.69 $ 9,969.04 Monthly 10212 PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 593 $ 10,162.87 $ 12,353.38 Monthly 10900 PUBLIC WORKS SAFETY AND TRAINING OFFICER EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 510 $ 6,717.77 $ 8,166.21 Monthly 10863 PURCHASING DIVISION MANAGER (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 598 $ 10,419.74 $ 12,664.94 Monthly 10440 REAL PROPERTY MANAGER EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 580 $ 9,525.46 $ 11,578.02 Monthly 10690 RISK DIVISION MANAGER (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 590 $ 10,011.84 $ 12,170.24 Monthly 10511 SENIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 576 $ 9,336.38 $ 11,348.50 Monthly 10154 SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 581 $ 9,573.03 $ 11,635.10 Monthly 10118 SENIOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MANAGER EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 600 $ 10,524.39 $ 12,792.18 Monthly 10514 SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST (U) EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 556 $ 8,450.43 $ 10,271.09 Monthly 10513 SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 556 $ 8,450.43 $ 10,271.09 Monthly 10300 SHELTER VETERINARIAN EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 678 $ 15,528.53 $ 18,874.93 Monthly 10689 SUPERVISING HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 559 $ 8,577.68 $ 10,425.68 Monthly 10443 TRAFFIC ENGINEER EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 573 $ 9,198.43 $ 11,180.83 Monthly 10740 TREASURY MANAGER EXEMPT MANAGEMENT 598 $ 10,419.74 $ 12,664.94 Monthly

EXECUTIVE/CONTRACTED/ELECTED
City of San Bernardino - Citywide Salary Schedule
Version Date: 6.9.2026
3 Exhibit B
Packet Page. 540
City of San Bernardino - Citywide Salary Schedule
Effective July 6, 2026
CLASS
CODE

CLASSIFICATION TITLE FLSA STATUS UNIT
SALARY
RANGE

BOTTOM STEP
(Step 1)

TOP STEP
(Step 21)
Monthly/
Hourly
09644 ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER (U) EXEMPT EXECUTIVE 705 17,767.80 $ $ 21,594.62 Monthly 09280 CHIEF OF POLICE (U) # EXEMPT EXECUTIVE NA 34,810.33 $ Monthly 09372 DEPUTY CITY MANAGER (U) EXEMPT EXECUTIVE 700 17,330.15 $ $ 21,064.23 Monthly 09685 DIRECTOR OF ANIMAL SERVICES (U) EXEMPT EXECUTIVE 660 14,195.44 $ $ 17,254.06 Monthly 09526 DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING (U) EXEMPT EXECUTIVE 662 14,338.16 $ $ 17,427.68 Monthly 09527 DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (U) EXEMPT EXECUTIVE 662 14,338.16 $ $ 17,427.68 Monthly 09701 DIRECTOR OF FINANCE & MANAGEMENT SERVICES (U) EXEMPT EXECUTIVE 692 16,652.31 $ $ 20,240.13 Monthly 09665 DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES & RISK MANAGEMENT (U) EXEMPT EXECUTIVE 660 14,195.44 $ $ 17,254.06 Monthly 09625 DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (U) EXEMPT EXECUTIVE 660 14,195.44 $ $ 17,254.06 Monthly 09731 DIRECTOR OF PARKS/REC/COMMUNITY SERVICES (U) EXEMPT EXECUTIVE 662 14,338.16 $ $ 17,427.68 Monthly 09753 DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS, OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE (U) EXEMPT EXECUTIVE 692 16,652.31 $ $ 20,240.13 Monthly 09399 CITY CLERK (U) # EXEMPT NA N/A $14,083.33 Monthly 00601 CITY COUNCIL EXEMPT ELECTED NA $3,394.91 Monthly
09370 CITY MANAGER (U) # EXEMPT NA NA $27,749.99 Monthly 00502 MAYOR EXEMPT ELECTED NA $4,166.67 Monthly

GENERAL
30011 ACCOUNTANT I (FLEX) NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 465 $ 5,478.10 $ Monthly 6,659.17 30012 ACCOUNTANT II NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 485 $ 6,053.45 $ Monthly 7,358.35 30017 ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN I (FLEX) NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 399 $ 3,942.58 $ Monthly 4,791.07 30018 ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN II NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 419 $ 4,355.29 $ Monthly 5,293.58 30030 ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN III NON- EXEMPT GENERAL 437 $ 4,764.36 $ Monthly 5,791.27 30709 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 400 $ 3,962.00 $ Monthly 4,815.32 30140 ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER I (FLEX) NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 411 $ 4,185.35 $ Monthly 5,087.24 30141 ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER II NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 424 $ 4,465.75 $ Monthly 5,428.31 30092 ANIMAL LICENSE INSPECTOR NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 370 $ 3,410.91 $ Monthly 4,146.51 30130 ANIMAL SERVICES REPRESENTATIVE NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 370 $ 3,410.91 $ Monthly 4,146.51 30119 ANIMAL SHELTER ATTENDANT NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 370 $ 3,410.91 $ Monthly 4,146.51 30400 ARBORIST NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 452 $ 5,134.57 $ Monthly 6,241.59 30894 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT/REAL PROP SPECIALIST NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 500 $ 6,523.21 $ Monthly 7,928.86 30271 ASSISTANT BUYER NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 430 $ 4,601.69 $ Monthly 5,592.19 30312 ASSISTANT LITERACY PROGRAM COORDINATOR NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 365 $ 3,327.15 $ Monthly 4,044.54 30168 ASSISTANT PLANNER (FLEX) NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 502 $ 6,588.77 $ Monthly 8,008.97 30072 BUILDING INSPECTOR I (FLEX) NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 460 $ 5,343.37 $ Monthly 6,495.29 30073 BUILDING INSPECTOR II NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 487 $ 6,114.15 $ Monthly 7,431.18 30074 BUILDING INSPECTOR III NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 511 $ 6,891.01 $ Monthly 8,376.76 30502 BUSINESS REGISTRATION INSPECTOR NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 459 $ 5,316.66 $ Monthly 6,462.52 30650 BUSINESS REGISTRATION REPRESENTATIVE I NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 419 $ 4,355.29 $ Monthly 5,293.58 30651 BUSINESS REGISTRATION REPRESENTATIVE II NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 429 $ 4,578.63 $ Monthly 5,564.28 30292 CEMETERY CARETAKER NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 395 $ 3,863.68 $ Monthly 4,696.38 30450 CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER I (FLEX) NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 441 $ 4,860.24 $ Monthly 5,907.80 30455 CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER II NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 472 $ 5,673.52 $ Monthly 6,895.86 City of San Bernardino - Citywide Salary Schedule
Version Date: 6.9.2026
4 Exhibit B
Packet Page. 541
City of San Bernardino - Citywide Salary Schedule
Effective July 6, 2026
CLASS
CODE

CLASSIFICATION TITLE FLSA STATUS UNIT
SALARY
RANGE

BOTTOM STEP
(Step 1)

TOP STEP
(Step 21)
Monthly/
Hourly
30135 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG)/HOUSING PROGRAM ASSISTANT NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 420 $ 4,377.14 $ Monthly 5,320.28 30890 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TECHNICIAN NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 446 $ 4,982.84 $ Monthly 6,057.11 30120 COMMUNITY INTERVENTION PROGRAM COORDINATOR NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 438 $ 4,788.62 $ Monthly 5,820.41 30754 COMMUNITY POLICING SPECIALIST NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 470 $ 5,616.48 $ Monthly 6,827.90 30821 COMMUNITY RECREATION PROGRAM COORDINATOR NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 388 $ 3,731.37 $ Monthly 4,536.16 30990 COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAM COORDINATOR NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 438 $ 4,788.62 $ Monthly 5,820.41 30621 CUSTODIAN NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 368 $ 3,376.93 $ Monthly 4,105.24 30222 CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 386 $ 3,694.96 $ Monthly 4,491.25 30226 CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE (BILINGUAL) NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 396 $ 3,883.11 $ Monthly 4,720.65 30227 CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE (BILINGUAL) (U) NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 396 $ 3,883.11 $ Monthly 4,720.65 30224 CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE (U) NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 386 $ 3,694.96 $ Monthly 4,491.25 30100 DATA ANALYST NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 444 $ 4,934.30 $ Monthly 5,997.62 30831 ELECTRICIAN I (FLEX) NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 445 $ 4,958.56 $ Monthly 6,026.75 30841 ELECTRICIAN II NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 465 $ 5,478.10 $ Monthly 6,659.17 30432 ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I (FLEX) NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 450 $ 5,083.60 $ Monthly 6,179.72 30434 ENGINEERING ASSISTANT II NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 475 $ 5,758.50 $ Monthly 7,000.26 30436 ENGINEERING ASSISTANT III NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 511 $ 6,891.01 $ Monthly 8,376.76 30445 ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 446 $ 4,982.84 $ Monthly 6,057.11 30420 ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS COORDINATOR NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 464 $ 5,451.40 $ Monthly 6,626.40 30921 EQUIPMENT MECHANIC I (FLEX) NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 431 $ 4,623.55 $ Monthly 5,620.12 30902 EQUIPMENT MECHANIC II NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 450 $ 5,083.60 $ Monthly 6,179.69 30943 EQUIPMENT SERVICE WORKER NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 408 $ 4,123.44 $ Monthly 5,011.97 30707 EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 430 $ 4,601.69 $ Monthly 5,592.19 30623 FACILITIES MAINTENANCE MECHANIC NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 420 $ 4,377.14 $ Monthly 5,320.28 30506 FLEET PARTS STOREKEEPER NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 398 $ 3,921.93 $ Monthly 4,767.99 30944 FLEET PARTS TECHNICIAN NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 438 $ 4,788.62 $ Monthly 5,820.41 30133 GRANTS ANALYST NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 476 $ 5,787.62 $ Monthly 7,035.46 30136 GRANTS ASSISTANT NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 390 $ 3,768.99 $ Monthly 4,581.06 30098 GROUNDWORKER ARBORIST NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 392 $ 3,806.63 $ Monthly 4,627.18 30516 HAZMAT TECHNICIAN NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 452 $ 5,134.57 $ Monthly 6,241.59 30698 HOMELESS OUTREACH SPECIALIST NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 464 $ 5,451.39 $ Monthly 6,626.40 30699 HOMELESS SERVICES ASSISTANT NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 420 $ 4,377.13 $ Monthly 5,320.29 30207 HUMAN RESOURCES TECHNICIAN NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 418 $ 4,333.44 $ Monthly 5,268.10 30101 HVAC MECHANIC NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 460 $ 5,343.37 $ Monthly 6,495.29 30638 LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION INSPECTOR I (FLEX) NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 447 $ 5,008.34 $ Monthly 6,087.44 30639 LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION INSPECTOR II NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 467 $ 5,533.93 $ Monthly 6,725.92 30113 LEAD ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 437 $ 4,764.36 $ Monthly 5,791.27 30080 LEAD BUILDING INSPECTOR NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 526 $ 7,426.33 $ Monthly 9,027.38 30463 LEAD CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 498 $ 6,458.89 $ Monthly 7,851.15 30311 LEAD CUSTODIAN NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 397 $ 3,902.52 $ Monthly 4,743.72 30932 LEAD EQUIPMENT MECHANIC NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 470 $ 5,616.48 $ Monthly 6,827.90 30490 LEAD MAINTENANCE WORKER NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 452 $ 5,134.57 $ Monthly 6,241.59 City of San Bernardino - Citywide Salary Schedule
Version Date: 6.9.2026
5 Exhibit B
Packet Page. 542
City of San Bernardino - Citywide Salary Schedule
Effective July 6, 2026
CLASS
CODE

CLASSIFICATION TITLE FLSA STATUS UNIT
SALARY
RANGE

BOTTOM STEP
(Step 1)

TOP STEP
(Step 21)
Monthly/
Hourly
30593 LEAD PARKS CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE WORKER NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 471 $ 5,645.61 $ Monthly 6,861.88 30335 LIBRARIAN I (FLEX) NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 450 $ 5,083.60 $ Monthly 6,179.72 30366 LIBRARIAN II NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 479 $ 5,875.01 $ Monthly 7,141.05 30341 LIBRARY ASSISTANT NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 370 $ 3,410.91 $ Monthly 4,146.51 30380 LIBRARY NETWORK TECHNICIAN NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 422 $ 4,420.83 $ Monthly 5,373.69 30391 LIBRARY TECHNICIAN I (FLEX) NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 380 $ 3,585.70 $ Monthly 4,358.93 30392 LIBRARY TECHNICIAN II NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 402 $ 4,000.84 $ Monthly 4,863.88 30215 LITERACY PROGRAM COORDINATOR NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 470 $ 5,616.48 $ Monthly 6,827.90 30486 MAINTENANCE WORKER I (FLEX) NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 393 $ 3,826.04 $ Monthly 4,650.25 30487 MAINTENANCE WORKER II NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 415 $ 4,269.11 $ Monthly 5,189.21 30488 MAINTENANCE WORKER III NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 425 $ 4,487.60 $ Monthly 5,455.04 30425 NPDES INSPECTOR I (FLEX) NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 461 $ 5,370.06 $ Monthly 6,528.07 30426 NPDES INSPECTOR II NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 485 $ 6,053.45 $ Monthly 7,358.35 30611 PARKS MAINTENANCE WORKER I (FLEX) NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 390 $ 3,768.99 $ Monthly 4,581.06 30622 PARKS MAINTENANCE WORKER II NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 421 $ 4,398.98 $ Monthly 5,346.99 30691 PLANNING AIDE NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 456 $ 5,237.76 $ Monthly 6,366.64 30680 PLANS EXAMINER I (FLEX) NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 499 $ 6,491.65 $ Monthly 7,890.01 30682 PLANS EXAMINER II NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 534 $ 7,728.57 $ Monthly 9,395.19 30481 PLUMBER NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 450 $ 5,083.60 $ Monthly 6,179.72 30585 POOL MAINTENANCE COORDINATOR NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 421 $ 4,398.98 $ Monthly 5,346.99 10360 PROGRAMMING/TRAFFIC ASSISTANT NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 400 $ 3,962.00 $ Monthly 4,815.33 30580 PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR I (FLEX) NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 476 $ 5,787.62 $ Monthly 7,035.46 30583 PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR II NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 499 $ 6,491.65 $ Monthly 7,890.01 30584 PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR III NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 529 $ 7,539.21 $ Monthly 9,163.34 30825 RECREATION THERAPIST NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 468 $ 5,560.63 $ Monthly 6,759.92 30115 REGISTERED VETERINARY TECHNICIAN NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 450 $ 5,083.60 $ Monthly 6,179.72 30708 SENIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 420 $ 4,377.14 $ Monthly 5,320.28 30229 SENIOR ANIMAL SERVICES REPRESENTATIVE NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 390 $ 3,768.99 $ Monthly 4,581.06 30410 SENIOR ARBORIST NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 502 $ 6,588.77 $ Monthly 8,008.97 30228 SENIOR CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 435 $ 4,717.01 $ Monthly 5,734.20 30230 SENIOR CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE (BILINGUAL) NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 445 $ 4,958.56 $ Monthly 6,026.75 30232 SENIOR CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE (BILINGUAL)(U) NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 445 $ 4,958.56 $ Monthly 6,026.75 30710 SENIOR OFFICE ASSISTANT NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 375 $ 3,497.09 $ Monthly 4,250.89 30978 SOLID WASTE FIELD INSPECTOR NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 450 $ 5,083.60 $ Monthly 6,179.72 30447 TRAFFIC SIGNAL TECHNICIAN I (FLEX) NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 450 $ 5,083.60 $ Monthly 6,179.72 30448 TRAFFIC SIGNAL TECHNICIAN II NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 484 $ 6,023.11 $ Monthly 7,320.70 30449 TRAFFIC SIGNAL TECHNICIAN III NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 513 $ 7,099.79 $ Monthly 8,315.01 30667 TREASURY ASSISTANT NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 399 $ 3,942.58 $ Monthly 4,791.07 30125 VETERINARY ASSISTANT NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 400 $ 3,962.00 $ Monthly 4,815.33 30620 VOLUNTEER COORDINATOR NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 358 $ 3,213.05 $ Monthly 3,904.95 30000 WEED ABATEMENT COORDINATOR NON-EXEMPT GENERAL 462 $ 5,396.77 $ 6,560.85 Monthly City of San Bernardino - Citywide Salary Schedule
Version Date: 6.9.2026
6 Exhibit B
Packet Page. 543
City of San Bernardino - Citywide Salary Schedule
Effective July 6, 2026
CLASS
CODE

CLASSIFICATION TITLE FLSA STATUS UNIT
SALARY
RANGE

BOTTOM STEP
(Step 1)

TOP STEP
(Step 21)
Monthly/
Hourly

MIDDLE MANAGEMENT
20013 ACCOUNTANT III EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 520 $ 7,204.67 $ Monthly 8,757.72 20457 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SUPERVISOR EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 484 $ 6,020.48 $ Monthly 7,317.51 20320 ANIMAL SERVICES MANAGER EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 526 $ 7,423.06 $ Monthly 9,023.43 20319 ANIMAL SERVICES SUPERVISOR EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 478 $ 5,843.34 $ Monthly 7,102.75 20620 AQUATICS SUPERVISOR EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 468 $ 5,558.21 $ Monthly 6,756.94 20169 ASSOCIATE PLANNER EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 530 $ 7,573.52 $ Monthly 9,205.44 20250 BUILDING INSPECTION SUPERVISOR EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 542 $ 8,040.65 $ Monthly 9,773.27 20263 BUSINESS REGISTRATION MANAGER EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 530 $ 7,573.51 $ Monthly 9,205.44 20271 BUYER EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 460 $ 5,341.01 $ Monthly 6,492.44 20923 COMMUNITY RECREATION MANAGER EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 556 $ 8,621.83 $ 10,479.42 Monthly 20925 COMMUNITY RECREATION PROGRAM SUPERVISOR EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 488 $ 6,141.79 $ Monthly 7,465.53 20504 COMMUNITY SERVICES CENTER SUPERVISOR EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 458 $ 5,288.84 $ Monthly 6,428.15 20781 COMMUNITY SERVICES OFFICER SUPERVISOR EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 480 $ 5,901.57 $ Monthly 7,173.12 20424 CONSTRUCTION MANAGER NON-EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 585 $ 9,963.75 $ 12,110.11 Monthly 20600 CRIME FREE PROGRAM COORDINATOR EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 490 $ 6,203.68 $ Monthly 7,540.76 20616 CUSTODIAL SUPERVISOR EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 477 $ 5,814.21 $ Monthly 7,066.35 20200 DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE) SPECIALIST EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 560 $ 8,795.33 $ 10,690.52 Monthly 20441 ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE NON-EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 532 $ 7,648.73 $ Monthly 9,297.64 20444 ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT MANAGER EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 560 $ 8,795.33 $ 10,690.52 Monthly 20024 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE MANAGER EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 551 $ 8,409.49 $ 10,222.19 Monthly 20025 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 523 $ 7,313.86 $ Monthly 8,889.97 20092 FACILITIES MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR NON-EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 515 $ 7,027.52 $ Monthly 8,541.74 20060 FOOD SERVICE SUPERVISOR NON-EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 478 $ 5,843.34 $ Monthly 7,102.75 20160 FORENSICS SUPERVISOR NON-EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 543 $ 8,080.68 $ Monthly 9,821.80 20490 FORESTRY SUPERVISOR NON-EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 542 $ 8,040.65 $ Monthly 9,773.27 20100 GRANTS MANAGER (U) EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 506 $ 6,719.33 $ Monthly 8,166.84 20170 LEAD FORENSICS SPECIALIST NON-EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 516 $ 7,062.72 $ Monthly 8,584.22 20388 LIBRARY CIRCULATION SUPERVISOR EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 460 $ 5,341.01 $ Monthly 6,492.44 20385 LIBRARY NETWORK ADMINISTRATOR EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 492 $ 6,265.55 $ Monthly 7,615.98 20387 LIBRARY PROGRAM COORDINATOR EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 450 $ 5,081.36 $ Monthly 6,176.99 20484 MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR NON-EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 522 $ 7,277.47 $ Monthly 8,845.07 20555 NPDES MANAGER EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 525 $ 7,386.66 $ Monthly 8,978.54 20178 PARK RANGER SUPERVISOR EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 480 $ 5,901.57 $ Monthly 7,173.12 20603 PARKS AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR NON-EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 534 $ 7,725.17 $ Monthly 9,391.07 20400 PERMIT SERVICES SUPERVISOR EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 494 $ 6,328.66 $ Monthly 7,692.43 20772 POLICE DISPATCH SUPERVISOR NON-EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 514 $ 6,992.34 $ Monthly 8,499.28 20765 POLICE RECORDS SUPERVISOR NON-EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 464 $ 5,448.99 $ Monthly 6,623.50 20019 PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 550 $ 8,367.03 $ 10,171.22 Monthly 20864 PROCUREMENT CONTRACT SPECIALIST EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 520 $ 7,204.67 $ Monthly 8,757.72 20949 PROPERTY AND EVIDENCE SUPERVISOR EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 494 $ 6,328.66 $ Monthly 7,692.43 City of San Bernardino - Citywide Salary Schedule
Version Date: 6.9.2026
7 Exhibit B
Packet Page. 544
City of San Bernardino - Citywide Salary Schedule
Effective July 6, 2026
CLASS
CODE

CLASSIFICATION TITLE FLSA STATUS UNIT
SALARY
RANGE

BOTTOM STEP
(Step 1)

TOP STEP
(Step 21)
Monthly/
Hourly
20243 SENIOR PLANNER * EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 567 $ 9,108.37 $ 11,070.29 Monthly 20995 STATION MANAGER EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 490 $ 6,203.68 $ Monthly 7,540.76 20336 TECHNOLOGY LIBRARIAN EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 502 $ 6,585.89 $ Monthly 8,005.45 20437 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE NON-EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 532 $ 7,648.73 $ Monthly 9,297.64 20438 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS AND SYSTEMS ANALYST EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 552 $ 8,451.96 $ 10,273.15 Monthly 20370 TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND LIGHTING SUPERVISOR NON-EXEMPT MIDDLE MANAGEMENT 533 $ 7,687.57 $ Monthly 9,343.74

PART-TIME
00300 APPRENTICE (PT) NON-EXEMPT NA 381 $17.65 $21.44 Hourly 00194 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATOR (PT) NON-EXEMPT NA 493 $29.94 $36.39 Hourly 00605 CRIME DATA TECHNICIAN (PT) NON-EXEMPT NA 368 $17.03 $20.68 Hourly 00054 CUSTODIAL AIDE (PT) NON-EXEMPT NA 368 $17.03 $20.68 Hourly 00083 EXTRA RELIEF HEAVY LABORER (PT) NON-EXEMPT NA 368 $17.03 $20.68 Hourly 00259 FOOD SERVICE PROGRAM SPECIALIST (PT) NON-EXEMPT NA 368 $17.03 $20.68 Hourly 00308 LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINEE NON-EXEMPT NA NA $34.77 $34.77 Hourly 00361 LIBRARY PAGE (PT) NON-EXEMPT NA 368 $17.03 $20.68 Hourly 00133 LIFEGUARD (PT) NON-EXEMPT NA 377 $16.96 $20.61 Hourly 00192 POLICE CADET (PT) NON-EXEMPT NA 368 $17.03 $20.68 Hourly 00520 POLICE CALL TAKER (PT) NON-EXEMPT NA 396 $19.85 $24.14 Hourly 00331 POOL MANAGER I (PT) NON-EXEMPT NA 421 $20.91 $25.41 Hourly 00333 POOL MANAGER II (PT) NON-EXEMPT NA 443 $23.33 $28.36 Hourly 00222 RECREATION AIDE (PT) NON-EXEMPT NA 368 $17.03 $20.68 Hourly 00244 RECREATION LEADER (PT) NON-EXEMPT NA 375 $17.98 $21.86 Hourly 00230 RECREATION SPECIALIST (PT) NON-EXEMPT NA 400 $18.83 $22.89 Hourly 00256 RECREATION SUPERVISOR (AQUATICS) (PT) NON-EXEMPT NA 481 $28.20 $34.28 Hourly 00266 SECURITY OFFICER I (PT) NON-EXEMPT NA 378 $17.04 $20.71 Hourly 00265 SECURITY OFFICER II (PT) NON-EXEMPT NA 402 $19.02 $23.12 Hourly 00283 SENIOR LIFEGUARD (PT) NON-EXEMPT NA 396 $18.46 $22.44 Hourly 00294 SENIOR RECREATION LEADER (PT) NON-EXEMPT NA 382 $18.62 $22.64 Hourly 00019 STUDENT INTERN (PT) NON-EXEMPT NA 368 $17.03 $20.68 Hourly 00301 VETERINARIAN - PER DIEM NON-EXEMPT NA NA $187.50 $187.50 Hourly

POLICE MANAGEMENT
50141 ASSISTANT CHIEF OF POLICE EXEMPT POLICE MANAGEMENT P6 26,655.51 $ $25,879.15 Monthly 50283 POLICE CAPTAIN (U) EXEMPT POLICE MANAGEMENT P5 21,772.90 $ $21,138.74 Monthly 50402 POLICE LIEUTENANT EXEMPT POLICE MANAGEMENT P4 18,500.24 $ $17,961.41 Monthly

POLICE SAFETY
40466 DETECTIVE/CORPORAL NON-EXEMPT POLICE SAFETY P2 $ 9,739.80 $12,401.26 Monthly 40751 POLICE OFFICER NON-EXEMPT POLICE SAFETY P1 $ 8,387.68 $10,875.40 Monthly 40332 POLICE SERGEANT NON-EXEMPT POLICE SAFETY P3 11,021.96 $ $14,013.77 Monthly

POLICE CIVILIAN
33017 ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN I (FLEX) - POLICE NON-EXEMPT POLICE CIVILIAN 399 $ 3,946.31 $ Monthly 4,795.59 City of San Bernardino - Citywide Salary Schedule
Version Date: 6.9.2026
8 Exhibit B
Packet Page. 545
City of San Bernardino - Citywide Salary Schedule
Effective July 6, 2026
CLASS
CODE

CLASSIFICATION TITLE FLSA STATUS UNIT
SALARY
RANGE

BOTTOM STEP
(Step 1)

TOP STEP
(Step 21)
Monthly/
Hourly
33018 ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN II - POLICE NON-EXEMPT POLICE CIVILIAN 419 $ 4,359.41 $ Monthly 5,298.60 33709 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT - POLICE NON-EXEMPT POLICE CIVILIAN 400 $ 3,965.76 $ Monthly 4,819.89 33758 COMMUNITY SERVICES OFFICER NON-EXEMPT POLICE CIVILIAN 427 $ 4,536.80 $ Monthly 5,514.87 33603 CRIME ANALYST NON-EXEMPT POLICE CIVILIAN 493 $ 6,305.84 $ Monthly 7,664.20 33602 CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION OFFICER NON-EXEMPT POLICE CIVILIAN 493 $ 6,305.84 $ Monthly 7,664.20 33707 EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT - POLICE NON-EXEMPT POLICE CIVILIAN 430 $ 4,606.06 $ Monthly 5,597.49 33165 FORENSICS SPECIALIST I (FLEX) NON-EXEMPT POLICE CIVILIAN 448 $ 4,964.13 $ Monthly 5,975.65 33166 FORENSICS SPECIALIST II NON-EXEMPT POLICE CIVILIAN 478 $ 5,851.42 $ Monthly 7,112.60 33515 MARKETING & PUBLIC RELATIONS SPECIALIST NON-EXEMPT POLICE CIVILIAN 461 $ 5,375.15 $ Monthly 6,534.27 30178 PARK RANGER NON-EXEMPT POLICE CIVILIAN 397 $ 3,906.23 $ Monthly 4,748.22 33581 PARKING ENFORCEMENT OFFICER NON-EXEMPT POLICE CIVILIAN 380 $ 3,589.10 $ Monthly 4,363.06 33848 POLICE FLEET MAINTENANCE EXPEDITOR NON-EXEMPT POLICE CIVILIAN 398 $ 3,925.65 $ Monthly 4,772.51 33218 POLICE PERSONNEL AND TRAINING TECHNICIAN NON-EXEMPT POLICE CIVILIAN 457 $ 5,269.45 $ Monthly 6,405.47 33219 POLICE RECORDS TECHNICIAN I (FLEX) NON-EXEMPT POLICE CIVILIAN 369 $ 3,397.13 $ Monthly 4,129.79 33220 POLICE RECORDS TECHNICIAN II NON-EXEMPT POLICE CIVILIAN 390 $ 3,772.57 $ Monthly 4,585.41 33947 PROPERTY AND EVIDENCE TECHNICIAN I (FLEX) NON-EXEMPT POLICE CIVILIAN 411 $ 4,189.32 $ Monthly 5,092.06 33948 PROPERTY AND EVIDENCE TECHNICIAN II NON-EXEMPT POLICE CIVILIAN 472 $ 5,678.90 $ Monthly 6,902.42 33770 RANGEMASTER NON-EXEMPT POLICE CIVILIAN 465 $ 5,483.29 $ Monthly 6,665.48 33710 SENIOR OFFICE ASSISTANT - POLICE NON-EXEMPT POLICE CIVILIAN 375 $ 3,500.40 $ Monthly 4,254.92

POLICE DISPATCH
32767 POLICE DISPATCHER I (FLEX) NON-EXEMPT POLICE DISPATCH 433 $ 4,906.72 $ Monthly 5,964.50 32768 POLICE DISPATCHER II NON-EXEMPT POLICE DISPATCH 464 $ 5,726.94 $ Monthly 6,961.25 City of San Bernardino - Citywide Salary Schedule
Version Date: 6.9.2026
9 Exhibit B
Packet Page. 546
POLICE SAFETY .

SALARY SCHEDULE
EFFECTIVE JULY 6, 2026
CLASS

CODE CLASSIFICATION TITLE UNIT
SALARY
RANGE
Step 1
First 6
Months of
Service
Step 2
Following
18 Months
of Service
Step 3
Third Year
of Service
Step 4
Fourth Year of
Service
Step5
Fifth &
Subsequen
t
Years of
Service
40466 DETECTIVE/CORPORAL POA P2 $9,739.80 $10,498.46 $11,257.15 $12,014.63 $12,773.30 40751 POLICE OFFICER POA P1 $8,387.68 $9,090.87 $9,795.29 $10,498.46 $11,201.66 40332 POLICE SERGEANT POA P3 $11,021.96 $11,874.69 $12,727.47 $13,581.44 $14,434.18 Exhibit B
Packet Page. 547
Project Name Category Ward Status FY 25/26
Amended Budget
FY 25/26
Expenditures Remaining Balance FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY29/30 FY30/31 Funding Source California Theater Renovation Buildings 1 Complete $ 2,949,176.70 3,080,028.41 $ 130,851.71 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S, Federal Grants, Cultural Development Fund City Hall Rehabilitation Project Buildings 1 Planning $ - 248,532.00 $ 248,532.00 $ 1,951,468.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S Emergency BU Generator for CNG Station Buildings 1 Planning $ - 208,072.31 $ 208,072.31 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S Encanto Park Community Center Improvements Buildings 1 Construction $ 894.03 2,310,235.34 $ 2,309,341.31 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Donations Fund, CDBG CV-1, CDBG CV-3, Cultural Development Fund Feldheym Central Library Revitalization Buildings 1 Planning $ 200,278.83 6,773,597.45 $ 6,573,318.62 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Library Facilities, State Grants Gym Flooring at Rudy Hernandez Community Center Buildings 1 Construction $ 241,765.57 320,334.00 $ 78,568.43 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ General Fund, State Grants, Cultural Development Fund HVAC replacement at Ruben Campos/Nunez Park Buildings 1 Construction $ 350,012.22 425,880.00 $ 75,867.78 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ CDBG, AB 1600 Parkland and Op Lytle Creek Community Center and Park Renovations Buildings 3 Planning $ 4,276.80 - $ (4,276.80) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Local Grants Makers Room/Computer Room at Feldheym Library Buildings 1 Design $ 35.58 102,067.78 $ 102,032.20 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ ARPA Fund Navigation Center - SB Hope Campus Buildings 1 Construction $ 4,971,878.69 25,345,522.33 $ 20,373,643.64 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Donations Fund, Measure S, ARPA Fund, CDBG, State Grants, Local Grants,

HOME ARP, HHAP
New Animal Shelter Buildings 3 Construction $ 1,954,008.22 2,984,156.37 $ 1,030,148.15 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S, Animal Services Fund One Stop Permitting Center Buildings 1 Planning $ - 798,031.25 $ 798,031.25 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S, Public Use Facilities Police Locker Room Renovation Buildings 1 Design $ 41,301.47 466,737.57 $ 425,436.10 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Law Enforcement Facilities Police Shooting Range at Perris Hill Park Buildings 2 Design $ - 600,000.00 $ 600,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Law Enforcement Facilities Roosevelt Bowl Rehabilitation Buildings 2 Design $ 41,975.24 907,806.12 $ 865,830.88 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S, ARPA Fund Waterman Landfill Vapor Extraction Buildings 3 Planning $ 163,138.60 4,438,546.00 $ 4,275,407.40 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Integrated Waste Management Villasenor Cameras Buildings 1 Design $ 64,471.89 100,000.00 $ 35,528.11 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S Amtrack-Metrolink - SBCTA ADA Platform Buildings 1 Planning $ - 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S California Theater - HVAC Replacement Buildings 1 Planning $ 15.42 750,000.00 $ 749,984.58 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S Regal Theater - HVAC Replacement Buildings 1 Planning $ - 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S Villasenor Library - Foundation Surfacing Buildings 1 Planning $ - 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S Rudy Hernandez - Roof Replacement Buildings 1 Planning $ - 400,000.00 $ 400,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S City Hall - 201A & B Buildings - Roof Replacement Buildings 1 Planning $ - 500,000.00 $ 500,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S 5th Street Senior Center - SCE Transformer Pad Buildings 1 Planning $ - 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S City Hall - 201a & 201b - SCE Transformer Pad Buildings 1 Planning $ - 35,000.00 $ 35,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S California Theater - Parking Structure (3 Level) Buildings 1 Planning $ 189.60 125,000.00 $ 124,810.40 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S City Hall Parking Structure (5 Level) Buildings 1 Design $ 10,180.87 150,000.00 $ 139,819.13 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S Shandin Hills Golf Club - Rehabilitation and Parking Lot Design Buildings 5 Planning $ - 1,000,000.00 $ 1,000,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S 5th St Senior Ctr Kitchen Phase 2 Buildings 1 Complete $ - 3,155.13 $ 3,155.13 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S Police Building Management System Buildings 1 Construction $ 59,441.55 70,303.63 $ 10,862.08 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Law Enforcement Facilities Public Works Rehab Buildings 1 Planning $ - 39,341.00 $ 39,341.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ CDBG School of Hope Demo Buildings 1 Construction $ 103,190.00 130,566.12 $ 27,376.12 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ General Fund FY 25/26 SB Hope Campus Buildings 1 Construction $ - 2,439,593.35 $ 2,439,593.35 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ CDBG, CDBG CV-1, CDBG CV-3 San Bernardino Police Fusion Center Buildings 1 Design $ - 107,000.00 $ 107,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Local Grants MWSC Soil Extraction Buildings All Planning $ - 250,000.00 $ 250,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Integrated Waste Management $ 55,274,506.16 $ 11,156,231.28 $ 44,118,274.88 $ 1,951,468.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - Lytle Creek Park Improvements - Futsal Field Parks & Recreation 3 Complete $ 6,799.80 145,024.10 $ 138,224.30 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ ARPA Fund, Cultural Development Fund Nicholson Park, Park Improvements Parks & Recreation 6 Construction $ 965,599.16 1,282,600.24 $ 317,001.08 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S, ARPA Fund, Liability Fund Newmark Ball Field(s) Lighting System Installation Parks & Recreation 4 Construction $ 93,343.84 720,215.50 $ 626,871.66 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S, AB 1600 Parkland and Op Speicher Park Multipurpose Field New Lighting Installation Parks & Recreation 2 Construction $ 88,100.80 466,954.48 $ 378,853.68 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S, AB 1600 Parkland and Op Citywide Irrigation System Upgrade Parks & Recreation All Planning $ - 250,000.00 $ 250,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S Hernandez Community Center: Security Fencing Parks & Recreation 1 Planning $ - 250,000.00 $ 250,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S Park Restrooms Program Parks & Recreation All Planning $ 7,163.84 996,925.17 $ 989,761.33 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S Wildwood Park & Encanto Park - Phase 1: Baseball/Softball fields repair Parks & Recreation 1, 4 Planning $ - 989,663.26 $ 989,663.26 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S Ruben Campos Community Center Parks & Recreation 1 Complete $ 230,510.18 559,928.08 $ 329,417.90 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S Perris Hills Senior Center Renovation Parks & Recreation 2 Planning $ - 396,535.31 $ 396,535.31 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S Bobby Vega Park Improvements Parks & Recreation 1 Planning $ 316.01 250,000.00 $ 249,683.99 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ AB 1600 Parkland and Op Parks Master Plan Study Parks & Recreation All Complete $ - 200,739.00 $ 200,739.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S Speicher Park Ballfields Improvements: Parking lot, concession stands, and restrooms (Phase 1) Parks & Recreation 2 Construction $ 1,832,954.00 4,877,804.71 $ 3,044,850.71 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S, County ARPA, Local Grants, Cultural Development Fund Seccombe Lake Park Improvements Parks & Recreation 1 Construction $ 6,426,568.37 8,843,943.37 $ 2,417,375.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ ARPA Fund, Local Grants City of San Bernardino Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) - All Projects Investing in the Future of San Bernardino
Buildings
Packet Page. 548
Project Name Category Ward Status FY 25/26
Amended Budget
FY 25/26
Expenditures Remaining Balance FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY29/30 FY30/31 Funding Source City of San Bernardino Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) - All Projects Investing in the Future of San Bernardino
Norton Park - Pickleball Courts Parks & Recreation 1 Planning $ 7,722.17 1,200,000.00 $ 1,192,277.83 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S Jerry Lewis Swim Center Improvements Parks & Recreation 2 Design $ 4,121.46 498,094.86 $ 493,973.40 $ 250,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S, Aquatics Facilities Pool Filtration Systems Improvements Parks & Recreation 0 Planning $ - 400,000.00 $ 400,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Aquatics Facilities Anne Shirrells Park gazebo Parks & Recreation 6 Planning $ - 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S Nicholson Park, park Improvements - Phase II Parks & Recreation 1 Design $ - 993,755.00 $ 993,755.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S, Local Grants Route 66 Park Centennial 3 parks - Nunez, La Plaza, Gutierrez Parks & Recreation 1, 6 Planning $ - 2,500,000.00 $ 2,500,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ AB 1600 Parkland and Op Delmann Heights Park - Field and Track Phases 1-3 Parks & Recreation 6 Planning $ - 500,000.00 $ 500,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S Expansion of Walk Trail - Electric Ave and 40th St Parks & Recreation 4 Planning $ - 350,000.00 $ 350,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S Villasenor Library - Parking Lot Surfacing Parks & Recreation 1 Cancelled $ 6,113.51 250,000.00 $ (406.30) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S Rowe Library - Parking Lot Surfacing Parks & Recreation 7 Construction $ 9,520.28 250,000.00 $ 240,479.72 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S Tom Minor Park -Park Improvements Parks & Recreation 5 Planning $ - 750,000.00 $ 750,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S Encanto Park Improvements Parks & Recreation 1 Planning $ - - $ 244,292.79 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S County ARPA Guadalupe Upgrades Parks & Recreation 1 Construction $ 10,986.00 14,683.42 $ 3,697.42 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ County ARPA Sal Saavedra Park: Guadalupe field, fence, stands, reroofing Parks & Recreation 1 Construction $ - 33,282.41 $ 33,282.41 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ ARPA Fund Field and Path of Travel at Gutierrez Park Parks & Recreation 6 Planning $ 1,050,413.72 1,093,539.46 $ 43,125.74 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ CDBG, Local Grants, AB 1600 Parkland and Op Ball Field Improvements at Encanto Park Parks & Recreation 1 Construction $ 254,544.36 272,025.60 $ 17,481.24 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ CDBG, AB 1600 Parkland and Op La Plaza Park Improvements Parks & Recreation 1 Design $ 55,292.74 1,789,657.00 $ 1,734,364.26 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S, Local Grants $ 31,150,370.97 $ 11,050,070.24 $ 20,100,300.73 $ 250,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - Annual Storm Drain Culvert Repairs Storm Drain All Design $ 19,578.39 1,664,066.10 $ 1,644,487.71 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Storm Drain Fund Storm Drain Catch Basin Screen Installation Storm Drain All Planning $ 259.32 535,152.72 $ 534,893.40 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S, Storm Drain Fund Waterman/Baseline Culvert Storm Drain 1 & 2 Planning $ - 135,000.68 $ 135,000.68 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Storm Drain Fund Sierra Way Storm Drain improvements Storm Drain 4, 7 Design $ 1,578.16 3,788,537.80 $ 3,786,959.64 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Storm Drain Fund Mt. Vernon Storm Drain Storm Drain 6 Design $ 3,248.47 6,123,143.02 $ 6,119,894.55 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Storm Drain Fund Sierra Way Storm Drain Storm Drain 4, 7 Design $ - 6,500,000.00 $ 6,500,000.00 $ 2,150,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S, Storm Drain Fund Meyers Creek Focused Drainage Study Storm Drain 5 Design $ 21,812.00 67,843.44 $ 46,031.44 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Storm Drain Fund Drainage Channel at Cajon Blvd & Shenandoah Way Storm Drain 6 Planning $ - 250,000.00 $ 250,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Storm Drain Fund Hill Drive Storm Drain - Acacia to Mayfield Storm Drain 4 Design $ 22,173.14 1,544,607.60 $ 1,522,434.46 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S, Storm Drain Fund 19th St at Massachusetts Drainage Improvements Storm Drain 6 Design $ 2,505.91 511,000.00 $ 508,494.09 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S, Storm Drain Fund Pleasant Hill Storm Drain Easement and Storm Drain Palm Ave Storm Drain 4 Design $ 18,003.52 818,760.00 $ 800,756.48 $ 750,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S, Storm Drain Fund Lynwood - Piedmont - Pepper Storm Drain Storm Drain 4 Design $ 19,646.22 1,070,260.00 $ 1,050,613.78 $ 1,000,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S, Storm Drain Fund Drainage Inlet Repairs and Cross Gutters (Annual) FY25/26 Storm Drain All Planning $ - 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S, Storm Drain Fund Lynwood Dr at Arden Storm Drain Easement - Replace Corrugated Metal Pipe Storm Drain 4 Construction $ - 250,000.00 $ 250,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S, Storm Drain Fund $ 23,358,371.36 $ 108,805.13 $ 23,249,566.23 $ 4,000,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - Pavement Rejuvenation at Various Locations (Annual) Streets All Planning $ 26,900.00 2,664,043.85 $ 2,637,143.85 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S, Measure I University Parkway Extension - (State Street Extension) Phase 1- 16th St. to Baseline Rd. Streets 6 Design $ 48,300.15 1,181,374.92 $ 1,133,074.77 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Regional Circulation System Mt. Vernon Ave. Bridge Replacement (SBCTA Lead) Streets 3 Construction $ 831,323.64 2,739,985.95 $ 1,908,662.31 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Regional Circulation System 40th Street Widening from Electric Ave to Johnson St Streets 4 Design $ - 5,762,868.83 $ 5,762,868.83 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Regional Circulation System State HWY I-215 and University Parkway Interchange Streets 5 & 6 Construction $ - 2,865,741.54 $ 2,865,741.54 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ General Fund, Measure I H St. Widening from Kendall Dr. to 40th St. Streets 4 Design $ - 3,893,398.28 $ 3,893,398.28 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure I, Regional Circulation System Construct Median on Kendall Ave to "E" St - Curve Streets 4, 5, 7 Construction $ 6,596.64 3,050,000.00 $ 3,043,403.36 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S, Gas Tax Fund, Measure I Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation Streets All Planning $ - 9,829,390.20 $ 9,829,390.20 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ RMRA Fund, Measure I Pavement Management Program Streets All Design $ 283,068.27 797,560.62 $ 514,492.35 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure I Storm Drain
Parks
Packet Page. 549
Project Name Category Ward Status FY 25/26
Amended Budget
FY 25/26
Expenditures Remaining Balance FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY29/30 FY30/31 Funding Source City of San Bernardino Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) - All Projects Investing in the Future of San Bernardino
Street Sweeping Signage Program Streets All Planning $ - 1,515,448.00 $ 1,515,448.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S Cross Street Bridge Bridge Replacement Streets 2 Construction $ 1,682,619.34 1,865,401.55 $ 182,782.21 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ General Fund SB County (Lead) Joint Street Rehabilitation Projects: Lynwood Dr & Other Roads Streets Various Design $ - 3,583,750.00 $ 3,583,750.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure I, RMRA Fund, Gas Tax Fund SB County (Lead) Joint Project Bridges - 4th Avenue and Mountain Drive Streets 5 Design $ - 756,250.00 $ 756,250.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ RMRA Fund, Gas Tax Fund ADA Transition Plan/Report (RFP) Streets All Design $ 2,599.89 1,000,000.00 $ 997,400.11 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S, Gas Tax Fund, Measure I State Highway CA-210 at Waterman Avenue (Caltrans Lead) Streets 7 Construction $ 555,625.37 996,774.09 $ 441,148.72 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S, Measure I Bridge Management - Master Plan Streets All Planning $ - 500,000.00 $ 500,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S 28th Street Traffic Calming Measures Streets 7 Design $ 44,212.53 506,641.00 $ 462,428.47 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S, Traffic Safety Fund Rialto Ave - Medians at Metrolink Crossing Rancho Ave Streets 3 Design $ 9,057.40 344,606.55 $ 335,549.15 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S, Traffic Safety Fund Phase I Pavement Rehabilitation - 14 Locations Streets All Planning $ 5,715,366.72 7,110,551.72 $ 1,395,185.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ RMRA Fund, Gas Tax Fund "E" St - Medians from Fairway Drive to 10th Street Streets 1, 2, 3 Design $ 1,137.52 3,503,000.00 $ 3,501,862.48 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Federal Grants, Traffic Safety Fund Bridge Repair at various locations (Annual) FY25/26 Streets All Planning $ 4,234.53 250,000.00 $ 245,765.47 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Traffic Safety Fund ADA Access Ramps Street Improvements in Various Locations (Annual) (Ramps) FY25/26 Streets All Planning $ - 500,000.00 $ 500,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Gas Tax Fund, Measure I Street Improvements (Rehabilitation) City Wide at 50 locations Streets All Planning $ - 18,898,134.58 $ 18,898,134.58 $ 2,500,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S, RMRA Fund, Gas Tax Fund, Measure I City of Highland Joint Project (Caltrans Lead): CA-210 & Victoria Ave Interchange Streets 2 & 4 Design $ - 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Traffic Safety Fund Street and Storm Drain improvements Victoria Ave from 6th to 3rd St Streets 1 Planning $ - 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Traffic Safety Fund SB County (Lead) Joint Street Rehabilitation Project: Old Waterman Canyon Rd Streets 4 Planning $ - 339,000.00 $ 339,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure I City of Rialto Eucalyptus Ave - Rialto Ave to Merril Street Repair Streets 6 Planning $ - 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Gas Tax Fund Study Report (PSR) I-215 Fwy & Palm Ave Interchange Project Streets 5,6 Planning $ - 500,000.00 $ 500,000.00 $ 678,100.00 $ 874,750.00 $ 874,750.00 $ - $ - $ Traffic Safety Fund, Measure I, Regional Circulation System Waterman Ave Street Scaping Project Streets 4 Design $ - 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Measure S Operational Improvements: I-210 Fwy and Del Rosa Ave Streets 4,7 Planning $ - 500,000.00 $ 500,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Traffic Safety Fund 5th Street and Pedley Rd Streets 1 Complete $ 340,877.00 355,500.00 $ 14,623.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ RMRA Fund, Gas Tax Fund St Rehab Major Arterial Entrance Streets Various Design $ - 7,352,750.90 $ 7,352,750.90 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ RMRA Fund, Measure I $ 83,512,172.58 $ 9,551,919.00 $ 73,960,253.58 $ 3,178,100.00 $ 874,750.00 $ 874,750.00 $ - $ - Traffic Signal Improvements at Various Locations (Annual) Traffic Controls All Design $ 773.57 159,625.71 $ 158,852.14 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Traffic Safety Fund, Local Regional Circulation Traffic Signal Battery Backup Systems (Annual) Traffic Controls All Design $ 5,607.32 76,609.12 $ 71,001.80 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Traffic Safety Fund, Local Regional Circulation Street Light Replacement at Various Locations (Annual) Traffic Controls All Design $ - 168,011.71 $ 168,011.71 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Gas Tax Fund, Traffic Safety Fund Traffic Safety Controls - Hardware Improvements (Annual) Traffic Controls All Design $ - 193,412.74 $ 193,412.74 $ 100,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Traffic Safety Fund, Local Regional Circulation Traffic Management Center (TMC) Traffic Controls All Design $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Local Regional Circulation Planning Study for Safety and Roads Baseline Traffic Controls All Design $ 143,041.60 286,576.00 $ 143,534.40 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Federal Grants, Local Regional Circulation Uncontrolled Crosswalks Evaluation Traffic Controls All Design $ 3,069.50 176,000.00 $ 172,930.50 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Traffic Safety Fund, Local Regional Circulation Upgrade Downtown Guide Signs Traffic Controls 1 Planning $ - 55,000.00 $ 55,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Gas Tax Fund Signing and Striping at Various Locations (Annual) FY25/26 Traffic Controls All Planning $ 143,535.51 420,000.00 $ 276,464.49 $ 420,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Traffic Safety Fund Rectangular Flashing Beacons (Annual) FY25/26 Traffic Controls All Planning $ - 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Traffic Safety Fund Traffic Calming Studies (Annual) Traffic Controls All Planning $ - 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Traffic Safety Fund Traffic Counts, Design and Traffic Reports (Annual) Traffic Controls All Planning $ - 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Local Regional Circulation Master Communication - Initial Assessment Traffic Controls All Planning $ - 200,000.00 $ 200,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Traffic Safety Fund 5th St and Arrowhead Ave Traffic Signal Modification Traffic Controls 1 Planning $ - 45,000.00 $ 45,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Traffic Safety Fund 5th St and Sierra Way Taffic Signal Modifications Traffic Controls 1 Planning $ - 45,000.00 $ 45,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Traffic Safety Fund Metal Gates (pipe) @ Mirada Road and Citrus St Traffic Controls 4 Planning $ - 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Traffic Safety Fund Traffic Signal at Hunts Ln and Harwick Dr Traffic Controls 3 Planning $ - 45,000.00 $ 45,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Traffic Safety Fund Baseline Smart Corridor Traffic Controls 1,2,6 Planning $ - 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Traffic Safety Fund Upgrade Various Signal Hardware Traffic Controls All Complete $ 4,734.36 435,752.25 $ 431,017.89 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Federal Grants, State Grants Implement Advance Dilemma Zone Traffic Controls 1,2,3,6,7 Complete $ - 16,227.18 $ 16,227.18 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Federal Grants, State Grants EECBG Voucher Program - Solar Retrofit 2024 Traffic Controls 1,2,5,7 Construction $ - 510.55 $ 510.55 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Federal Grants $ 2,747,725.26 $ 300,761.86 $ 2,446,963.40 $ 520,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 196,043,146.33 $ 32,167,787.51 $ 163,875,358.82 $ 9,899,568.00 $ 874,750.00 $ 874,750.00 $ - $ - Streets
Traffic
Total Capital Improvement Program Budget
Packet Page. 550
Project Name Category Ward Status
Proposed Deferral
Amount from FY
2025/26
Funding Source
City Hall Rehabilitation Project* Buildings 1 Planning $ 248,532 Measure S Emergency BU Generator for Compressed Natural Gas Station Buildings 1 Planning $ 208,072 Measure S One Stop Permitting Center Buildings 1 Planning $ 400,000 Measure S Villasenor Cameras Buildings 1 Design $ 35,528 Measure S Villasenor Library - Foundation Surfacing at 5th and Mt Vernon Avenue Buildings 1 Planning $ 50,000 Measure S Citywide Irrigation System Upgrade Parks & Recreation All Planning $ 250,000 Measure S Hernandez Community Center: Security Fencing Parks & Recreation 1 Planning $ 250,000 Measure S Ruben Campos Community Center Parks & Recreation 1 Planning $ 250,000 Measure S Perris Hills Senior Center Renovation Parks & Recreation 2 Planning $ 396,535 Measure S Norton Park - Pickleball Courts Parks & Recreation 1 Planning $ 1,194,390 Measure S Delmann Heights Park - Field and Track Phases 1-3 Parks & Recreation 6 Planning $ 500,000 Measure S Expansion of Walk Trail - Electric Ave and 40th St Parks & Recreation 4 Planning $ 350,000 Measure S Tom Minor Park -Park Improvements Parks & Recreation 5 Planning $ 750,000 Measure S Street Sweeping Signage Program Streets All Planning $ 1,000,000 Measure S Bridge Management - Master Plan Streets All Planning $ 500,000 Measure S Deferral Total $ 6,383,058
FY 2026/27 Proposed CIP Measure S Deferrals
*Project has additional FY 2026/27 allocation to bring total amount to $2.2M.

Packet Page. 551

CONSENT CALENDAR
City of San Bernardino
Request for Council Action
Date: June 17, 2026
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Telicia Lopez, City Clerk
Department: City Clerk
Subject: Notice and Call of the General Municipal Election Run-Off Recommendation:

It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, take the following actions to conduct the General Municipal Run-Off Election on Tuesday, November 3, 2026:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 2026-074 calling for the holding of a General Municipal Run-Off Election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, for the election of certain officers as required by the provisions of the San Bernardino City Charter;

2. Adopt Resolution No.2026-075 requesting the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino to consolidate a General Municipal Run-Off Election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, with the Statewide General Election to be held on the same date pursuant to section 10403 of the Elections Code;

3. Adopt Resolution No. 2026-076 adopting regulations for Candidates for elective office pertaining to candidate statements submitted to the voters at an election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2026.

City Manager's Comments
NA
Executive Summary
Adopt the resolutions associated with the City of San Bernardino, November 3, 2026, General Municipal Run-Off Election. Calling the Election, and requesting to consolidate the Election with the County of San Bernardino Statewide General, and regulations for candidate statements.

Background
Pursuant to Article 8, Section 800, of the City Charter, the primary and general Packet Page. 552
municipal election shall be held in said City in consolidation with the State Primary Election and the State General Election and every two (2) years thereafter. City elections shall follow the provisions and procedures of the State Elections Code as applicable to general law cities.

The City participated in the statewide Primary Election on June 2, 2026. The election results will be provided to City staff following the completion of the canvass by the County of San Bernardino Registrar of Voters.

The following offices were subject to election in the June 2026 Primary Election:
• First Ward Council Member
• Second Ward Council Member
• Fourth Ward Council Member
• Mayor
As the result the following offices are subject to a run-off election in November:
• First Ward Council Member
• Second Ward Council Member
• Fourth Ward Council Member
Discussion
Pursuant to Section 10400 of the Election Code, the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino must request that the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino consolidate the City’s municipal election with the consolidated Statewide General Election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2026. Further, the County requires a resolution from the City of San Bernardino authorizing the San Bernardino County Registrar of Voters to conduct the election and canvass the returns. The County will provide most of the election services. The City Clerk will be responsible for providing and transmitting the necessary documents to the County to hold the election and provide for receipt of all candidates’ statements and related documents, including dissemination of information to prospective candidates. The candidate nomination period will begin on Monday, July 13, 2026, and will end on Friday, August 7, 2026.

Results to the general election shall be certified by the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, following the completion of the canvass by the County of San Bernardino Registrar of Voters.

Pursuant to section 103307 and 13308 of the California Elections Code each Candidate for nonpartisan elective office in any local agency, including any city, county, city and county, or district, may prepare a candidate’s statement with the name, age, and occupation of the candidate and a brief description, of no more than 200 words, of the candidate’s education and qualifications expressed by the candidate himself or herself. However, the governing body of the local agency may authorize an increase in the limitations on words for the statement from 200 to 400 words. The statement shall not include the party affiliation of the candidate, nor membership or activity in partisan political organizations. The statement shall be limited to a recitation of Packet Page. 553
candidate’s own personal background and qualifications and shall not in any way make reference to other candidates for that office or to another candidate’s qualifications, character, or activities. The Mayor and City Council can direct staff to increase the number of words in the statement from 200 to 400 words.

Approval from the Mayor and City Council will result in the scheduling of the General Municipal Election on Tuesday, November 2, 2026, for three (3) Members of the City Council for Wards 1, 2 and 4, to the voters of the City.

As the City’s Election Office, the City Clerk is to be directed to publish a notice of the general election which shall contain the following:

A. The time of the election.

B. The offices to be filled, specifying full or short term.

C. The hours the polls will be open.
2021-2025 Strategic Targets and Goals
Adopting the Resolutions associated with the 2026 General Election aligns with Key Strategic Target Goal No. 1a: Establish a clear policy direction and predictable organization structures.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact with this item. The Primary Election and General Election Run-Off have been budgeted. As the election develops, any impact on the General Fund will be brought forward for Council consideration and approval.

Conclusion
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, take the following actions to conduct the General Municipal Run-Off Election on Tuesday, November 3, 2026:
• Adopt Resolution No. 2026-074 calling for the holding of a General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, for the election of certain officers as required by the provisions of the San Bernardino City Charter; • Adopt Resolution No. 2026-075 requesting the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino consolidate a General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, with the Statewide General Election to be held on the same date pursuant to section 10403 of the Elections Code; • Adopt Resolution No. 2026-076 adopting regulations for Candidates for elective office pertaining to candidate statements submitted to the voters at an election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2026.

Attachments
Attachment 1 - Resolution No. 2026-074 – Noticing and Calling the General Election Municipal Election
Attachment 2 - Resolution No. 2026-075 – Requesting to Consolidate the General Election with the County Board of Supervisors
Packet Page. 554
Statewide General Election
Attachment 3 - Resolution No. 2024-076 – Establishing a Candidate Statement Policy
Ward:

All Wards
Synopsis of Previous Council Actions:

None
Packet Page. 555
Resolution No. 2026-074
Resolution 2026-074
June 17, 2026

Page 1 of 3 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-074

RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA,

CALLING FOR THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL

MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY,
NOVEMBER 3, 2026, FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN

OFFICERS AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE

SAN BERNARDINO CITY CHARTER
WHEREAS, under the provisions of the San Bernardino City Charter, a General Municipal Election shall be held on November 3, 2026, for the purpose of a run-off election to elect Members of the City Council from Wards 1, 2, and 4, for the full term of four years.

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 2. That pursuant to the requirements of the San Bernardino City Charter, there is called and ordered to be held in the City of San Bernardino, California, on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, a General Municipal Election for the purpose of a run-off election to elect Members of the City Council from Wards 1, 2, and 4, for the full term of four years.

SECTION 3. That the City Clerk is authorized, instructed, and directed to coordinate with the County of San Bernardino to procure and furnish any and all official ballots, notices, printed matter and all supplies, equipment and paraphernalia that may be necessary in order to properly and lawfully conduct the election.

SECTION 4. The Mayor and City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.

SECTION 5. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable.

SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately.

APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk this 17th day of June 2026.

Packet Page. 556
Resolution No. 2026-074
Resolution 2026-074
June 17, 2026

Page 2 of 3 ends

Helen Tran, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Attest:

Telicia Lopez, CMC, City Clerk
Approved as to form:

Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney
Packet Page. 557
Resolution No. 2026-074
Resolution 2026-074
June 17, 2026

Page 3 of 3 ends

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
I, Telicia Lopez, CMC, City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. 2026-074, adopted at a regular meeting held on the 17th day of June 2026 by the following vote:

Telicia Lopez, CMC, City Clerk
Packet Page. 558
Resolution No. 2026-075
Resolution 2026-075
June 17, 2026

Page 1 of 5 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-075

RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA,

ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR

ELECTIVE OFFICE PERTAINING TO CANDIDATE

STATEMENTS SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS AT AN
ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3,
2026
WHEREAS, §13307 of the Elections Code of the State of California provides that the governing body of any local agency adopt regulations pertaining to materials prepared by any candidate for a municipal election, including costs of the optional candidate statement; and WHEREAS, Section 13307(b) of the California Elections Code states that the Statement of each candidate shall be printed in type of uniform size and darkness, and with uniform spacing; and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk is responsible for enforcing formatting requirements that exceed those acceptable by the County and wishes to streamline the review process by imposing limits relating to the format of candidate statements to block format, and prohibit Bolding, Capitalized Words, Italics, and Underlining. The City Clerk has final sign-off and approval of all candidate statements for elected city offices in accordance with state and local law.

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. General Provisions. That pursuant to §13307 of the Elections Code of the State of California, each candidate for elective office to be voted for at an Election to be held in the City of San Bernardino on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, may prepare a candidate’s statement on an appropriate form provided by the City Clerk. The statement may include the name, age and occupation of the candidate and a brief description of no more than 200 words of the candidate’s education and qualifications expressed by the candidate himself or herself. The statement shall not include party affiliation of the candidate, nor membership or activity in partisan political organizations. The statement shall be filed in typewritten form in the office of the City Clerk at the time the candidate’s nomination papers are filed. The statement may be withdrawn, but not changed, during the period for filing nomination papers and until 5:00 p.m. of the next working day after the close of the nomination period.

The City Clerk shall require each candidate filing a statement to pay a deposit in advance, as a condition of having his or her statement included in the voters' pamphlet.

SECTION 2. Foreign Language Policy.

A. Pursuant to the Federal Voting Rights Act, candidate statements will be translated into all languages required by the County of San Bernardino. The County is required to translate candidate’s statements into the following languages: Spanish.

Packet Page. 559
Resolution No. 2026-075
Resolution 2026-075
June 17, 2026

Page 2 of 5 ends

B. The County will print and mail sample ballots and candidate statements to all voters in English and Spanish. The County will make the sample ballots and candidates statements in the required languages available at all polling places, on the County’s website, and in the City Clerk’s Department for the City of San Bernardino.

SECTION 3 Endorsements. It is the policy of the San Bernardino County Registrar of Voters that any named individual or specific organization listed as an endorsement in a candidate statement must be verified by the City Clerk of the City of San Bernardino as endorsing the candidate prior to printing in the Voter Information Guide and Sample Ballot. Verification of the endorsement must be in the form of a copy of a letter of endorsement, or in a direct communication from the endorser to the City Clerk in the form of email or mailed correspondence. All endorsements or verification of endorsements from an individual or organization of a candidate must be submitted to the City Clerk no later than 5:00 PM on the last day of the filing period for review and verification. The verified endorsements will then be provided to the San Bernardino County Registrar of Voters.

SECTION 4. Payment.

A. Translations:

1. The candidate shall be required to pay for the cost of translating the candidate’s statement into any required foreign language as specified in (A) and/or (B) of Section 2 above pursuant to Federal and\or State law.

2. The candidate shall be required to pay for the cost of translating the candidate’s statement into any foreign language that is not required as specified in (A) and/or (B) of Section 2 above, pursuant to Federal and\or State law, but is requested as an option by the candidate.

B. Printing:

1. The candidate shall be required to pay for the cost of printing the candidate’s statement in English in the main voter pamphlet.

2. The candidate shall be required to pay for the cost of printing the candidate’s statement in a foreign language required in (A) of Section 2 above, in the main voter pamphlet.

3. The candidate shall be required to pay for the cost of printing the candidate’s statement in a foreign language requested by the candidate per (B) of Section 2 above, in the main voter pamphlet.

4. The candidate shall be required to pay for the cost of printing the candidate’s statement in a foreign language required by (A) of Section 2 above, in the facsimile voter pamphlet.

The City Clerk shall provide an estimate the total cost of printing, handling, translating, and mailing the candidate’s statements filed pursuant to this section, including costs incurred as a result of complying with the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (as amended), and require each candidate filing a statement to pay in advance to the local agency his or her estimated pro rata share as a condition of having his or her statement included in the voter’s pamphlet. An estimated payment is required, and the estimate is just an approximation of the actual cost that varies from one election to another election and may be significantly more or less than the estimate, depending on the actual number of candidates filing statements. Accordingly, the City Clerk is not bound by the estimate and may, Packet Page. 560
Resolution No. 2026-075
Resolution 2026-075
June 17, 2026

Page 3 of 5 ends

on a pro rata basis, bill the candidate for additional actual expense or refund any excess paid depending on the final actual cost. In the event of underpayment, the City Clerk may require the candidate to pay the balance of the cost incurred. In the event of overpayment, the City Clerk shall prorate the excess amount among the candidates and refund the excess amount paid within 30 days of the election.

SECTION 5. Miscellaneous.

A) All translations shall be provided by professionally certified translators.

B) The City Clerk shall comply with all recommendations and standards set forth by the California Secretary of State regarding occupational designations and other matters relating to elections.

SECTION 6 . Additional Materials. No candidate will be permitted to include additional materials in the sample ballot package.

SECTION 7. That the City Clerk shall provide each candidate or the candidate’s representative a copy of this Resolution at the time nominating petitions are issued.

SECTION 8. That all previous resolutions establishing council policy on payment for candidate statements are repealed.

SECTION 9. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

SECTION 10. The Mayor and City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.

SECTION 11. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable.

SECTION 12. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately.

APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk this 17th day of June 2026.

Helen Tran, Mayor
Packet Page. 561
Resolution No. 2026-075
Resolution 2026-075
June 17, 2026

Page 4 of 5 ends

City of San Bernardino
Attest:

Telicia Lopez, CMC, City Clerk
Approved as to form:

Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney
Packet Page. 562
Resolution No. 2026-075
Resolution 2026-075
June 17, 2026

Page 5 of 5 ends

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
I, Telicia Lopez, CMC, City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. 2026-075, adopted at a regular meeting held on the 17th day of June 2026 by the following vote:

Telicia Lopez, CMC, City Clerk
Packet Page. 563
Resolution No. 2026-076
Resolution 2026-076
June 17, 2026

Page 1 of 4 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-076

RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA,

REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE

COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CONSOLIDATE A

GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON
NOVEMBER 3, 2026, WITH THE STATEWIDE GENERAL

ELECTION TO BE HELD ON THE SAME DATE
PURSUANT TO § 10403 OF THE ELECTIONS CODE
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Bernardino called a General Municipal Election to be held on November 3, 2026, for the purpose of a run-off election to elect Members of the City Council from Wards 1, 2, and 4, for the full term of four years, and WHEREAS, it is desirable that the General Municipal election be consolidated with the Statewide General election to be held on the same date and that within the city the precincts, polling places (vote centers) and election officers of the two elections be the same, and that the county election department of the County of San Bernardino canvass the returns of the General Municipal Election and that the election be held in all respects as if there were only one election.

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 2. That pursuant to the requirements of § 10403 of the Elections Code, the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino is hereby requested to consent and agree to the consolidation of a General Municipal Election with the Statewide General election on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, for the purpose of the election of two (2) Members of the City Council, for the full term of four (4) years.

SECTION 3. That the county election department is authorized to canvass the returns of the General Municipal Election. The election shall be held in all respects as if there were only one election, and only one form of ballot shall be used. The election will be held and conducted in accordance with the provisions of law regulating the statewide or special election.

SECTION 4. That the Board of Supervisors is requested to issue instructions to the county election department to take any and all steps necessary for the holding of the consolidated election.

Packet Page. 564
Resolution No. 2026-076
Resolution 2026-076
June 17, 2026

Page 2 of 4 ends

SECTION 5. That the City of San Bernardino recognizes that additional costs will be incurred by the County by reason of this consolidation and agrees to reimburse the County for any costs.

SECTION 6. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the Board of Supervisors and the county election department of the County of San Bernardino.

SECTION 7. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

SECTION 10. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately.

APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk this 17th day of June 2026.

Helen Tran, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Attest:

Telicia Lopez, CMC, City Clerk
Packet Page. 565
Resolution No. 2026-076
Resolution 2026-076
June 17, 2026

Page 3 of 4 ends

Approved as to form:

Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney
Packet Page. 566
Resolution No. 2026-076
Resolution 2026-076
June 17, 2026

Page 4 of 4 ends

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
I, Telicia Lopez, CMC, City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. 2026-076, adopted at a regular meeting held on the 17th day of June 2026 by the following vote:

Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______
IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______
FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______
SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______
KNAUS _____ _____ _______ _______
FLORES _____ _____ _______ _______
ORTZ _____ _____ _______ _______
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this 18th day of June 2026.

Telicia, Lopez, CMC, City Clerk
Packet Page. 567

CONSENT CALENDAR
City of San Bernardino
Request for Council Action
Date: June 17, 2026
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Gabriel Elliott, Director of Community Development & Housing Department: Community Development & Housing
Subject: Adoption of Ordinance No. MC-1661 Banning Short-Term Rentals (All Wards)
Recommendation:

It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Ordinance No. MC-1661 amending Section 19.02.050 (Basic Provisions – Definitions) and Chapter 19.04 (Residential Zones) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code banning short-term and vacation rentals in the City of San Bernardino.

City Manager's Comments
The City Manager recommends approval of the adoption of Ordinance No. MC-1661 consistent with City Council action.

Executive Summary
At the April 15 City Council meeting, the City Council introduced and read by title only and waived further reading of Ordinance No. MC-1661 of the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, amending Section 19.02.050 (Basic Provisions – Definitions) and Chapter 19.04 (Residential Zones) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code (SBMC Title 19) banning short term and vacation rentals in the City of San Bernardino.

Background
The consideration of a Short-Term Rental program was continued from the City Council meeting of March 18, 2026, to allow staff to present a Regulatory Program to initiate a 2-Year Pilot Program at the direction of the City Council. At the City Council meeting of April 15, 2026, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. MC-1661 banning ShortTerm Rentals in the City of San Bernardino.

Discussion
Packet Page. 568
The City’s Municipal Code (SBMC) does not specifically address short-term rentals.

However, a commercial use is generally prohibited in residential zones, unless specifically permitted. Because the SBMC does not expressly prohibit or allow shortterm rentals, the issue of the SBMC’s intent is disputed by residential property owners who wish to lease to tourists and/or retreatants for short stays. The City of San Bernardino does not currently have an ordinance that expressly regulates STRs and has experienced the negative effects of excessive noise, parking problems and discarded trash on surrounding properties, resulting in numerous complaints, creating a threat to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, and welfare of the community. The convenience and marketability of online Short-Term Rental websites such as Airbnb.com, Homeaway.com, and VRBO.com have encouraged City property owners (and leaseholders) to rent residential properties to tourists and other visitors on a short-term basis.

To manage the ban on short-term rentals, the City has engaged the services of Deckard Technologies, a company that utilizes data science expertise to assist local governments with managing compliance activity and enforcement, such as short-term rentals properties. The latest proposal from Deckard Technologies is attached (Attachment 2).

Deckard Technologies will utilize Rentalscape, a platform that accurately tracks activity within the City of San Bernardino to identify the exact addresses of the STR listings within the City limits. This enables accurate display of STR activity within the City and its community districts. With the ban in place, Deckard Technologies will collect the following information regarding active STRs in the City of San Bernardino:

1. Information on STRs currently active in the City of San Bernardino;

2. The aggregate revenue from actively listed bookings;

3. The average number of nights booked per reservation;

4. The major platforms used by STR hosts;

5. Average daily rates;

6. Booking trends during the Reporting Period;

7. Identify, by address, the violations of STR ordinances within the City;

8. Identify the actively listed STRs by month and address;

9. The total number of properties actively listed in the City of San Bernardino during the Reporting Period;

10.List the property owners; and

11.List the permit history of each property offering STRs in the San Bernardino.

Service Cost include the following:

1. Annual Software Subscription: $8,500 (Identification, Compliance Monitoring and Rental Activity based on properties that are listed in Rentalscape as identified STRs).

2. Outreach Campaign: Included to drive compliance. Three letter campaign to inform and encourage property owners to become compliant with the Packet Page. 569
Registration Process.

3. 24/7 Live Hotline & Online Form. $5,000 annually. Classic Level Live Answered Hotline and Online Form that can dispatch to responsible parties depending on identified call and form flow.

4. Maximum Price: In no event will the total subscription fees in the first year exceed $13,500. Future years’ renewals will be subject to an annual increase.

Strategic Targets and Goals
A Development Code Amendment banning Short Term or vacation rentals is consistent with the City’s General Plan and aligns with Key Target Goal No. 3:

Improved Quality of Life and, more specifically, 3a: Improve the City’s appearance, cleanliness, and attractiveness. Specifically, a ban will update the Development Code to prohibit short term and vacation rentals in all residential zones, while regulating the land use will provide the City with the tools that will ensure consistency with the City’s land use designations as required by the City’s General Plan.

Fiscal Impact
Aside from the $13,500 annual subscription fee for Deckard Technologies’ services, there may be other costs associated with city staff time following through with the information provided by Deckard Technologies.

There is a potential for the City to collect a fine of $1,000 per day from property owners who continue to run STRs in violation of the ban.

Conclusion
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Ordinance No. MC-1661 amending Section 19.02.050 (Basic Provisions – Definitions) and Chapter 19.04 (Residential Zones) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code banning short-term and vacation rentals in the City of San Bernardino.

Attachments
Attachment 1 Ordinance No. 1661 – Banning Short Term Rentals Attachment 2 Exhibit A Development Code Section 19.02
Attachment 3 Exhibit B Development Code Section 19.04
Attachment 4 Exhibit C Development Code Section 19.04
Attachment 5 Deckard Technologies Agreement
Ward:

All Wards
Synopsis of Previous Council Actions:

On December 12, 2023, the Planning Commission, by a unanimous vote, adopted Resolution No. 2023-043PC forwarding a recommendation that the Mayor and City Council approve Development Code Amendment 23-01, amending Section 19.02.050 (Basic Provisions – Definitions) and Chapter 19.04 (Residential Zones) of the City of Packet Page. 570
San Bernardino Development Code (SBMC Title 19) in order to establish a Short-Term Rental Program in the City of San Bernardino. The Planning Commission also found that Development Code Amendment 23-01 was exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act.

On February 21, 2024, staff had presented Development Code Amendment 23-01 (Short-Term Rental Program) to the Mayor and City Council, with a recommendation to adopt a Short-Term rental program and approve Development Code Amendment 23-01 amending Section 19.02.050 (Basic Provisions – Definitions) and Chapter 19.04 (Residential Zones) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code (SBMC Title 19) in order to establish a Short-Term Rental Program in the City of San Bernardino. Staff was directed to bring back further analysis on short-term rentals and program enforcement.

On June 5, 2024, when the item was brought back to the City Council as directed, the Council, by a narrow majority, voted to ban short-term rentals in the city and requested that staff bring back an enforcement plan.

On December 9, 2025, staff presented a Resolution to the Planning Commission banning short-term rentals and Development Code Amendment 25-09 providing the mechanism to adopt the ban. However, the Planning Commission rejected the ban and instead re-forwarded Planning Commission Resolution 2023-043 (Attachment 3) memorializing their decision to push forward a recommendation to approve a regulatory program.

On February 18, 2026, staff presented two Ordinances for consideration, Ord. MC1660 adopting a regulatory program, and Ord. MC-1661 banning short-term rentals, along with Development Code amendment 23-01 (Short-Term Rental Program) to the Mayor and City Council, with a recommendation to adopt a Short-Term Rental program and approve Development Code Amendment 23-01 amending Section 19.02.050 (Basic Provisions – Definitions) and Chapter 19.04 (Residential Zones) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code (SBMC Title 19) in order to establish a Short-Term Rental Program in the City of San Bernardino. Staff was directed to bring back a revised regulatory program that would serve as a 2-year pilot program for short-term rentals.

On March 18, 2026, the item was continued to allow staff to provide additional information regarding regulating or prohibiting STRs in the city residential districts.

On April 15, 2026, Ordinance No. MC-1661 was adopted banning short-term rentals in the City of San Bernardino.

CC: Eric Levitt, City Manager
Packet Page. 571
Ordinance No. MC-1661
1 ORDINANCE NO. MC-1661

AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING SECTION 19.02.050 (BASIC PROVISIONS –
DEFINITIONS) AND CHAPTER 19.04 (RESIDENTIAL

ZONES) OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT CODE (SBMC TITLE 19) BANNING

SHORT TERM AND VACATION RENTALS IN THE CITY
OF SAN BERNARDINO; AND FINDING THAT THE

ACTION IS EXEMPT FROM REVIEW UNDER THE

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
WHEREAS, in recent years there has been an increase in privately-owned residential properties being used as short-term rentals in the City of San Bernardino (“City”); and WHEREAS, the unregulated use of existing housing as short-term rentals can escalate the demand for City services and create adverse impacts in residential zones; and WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino has received numerous complaints about residents leasing their residential properties to travelers and for weekend retreats as short-term rentals; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino Municipal Code (“SBMC”) does not specifically address short-term rentals; and
WHEREAS, on December 12, 2023, the Planning Commission, by a unanimous vote, adopted Resolution No. 2023-043PC forwarding a recommendation that the Mayor and City Council to approve Development Code Amendment 23-01, amending Section 19.02.050 (Basic Provisions – Definitions) and Chapter 19.04 (Residential Zones) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code (SBMC Title 19) to establish a Short-Term Rental Program in the City of San Bernardino; and found that Development Code Amendment 23-01 was exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act; and
WHEREAS, on February 21, 2024, staff took forward a recommendation to the Mayor and City Council for the adoption of a regulatory scheme for Short-Term Rentals; and WHEREAS, the City Council, at the meeting, directed staff to conduct additional analysis on enforcement measures and the effects of a Short-Term Rental Program on the City’s housing market; and
WHEREAS, on June 5, 2024, the City Council banned short-term rentals in the City; and WHEREAS, Development Code Amendment 25-09 is a City-initiated amendment to Section 19.02.050 (Basic Provisions – Definitions) and Chapter 19.04 (Residential Zones) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code (SBMC Title 19) in order to ban Short-Term Rentals in the City of San Bernardino; and
Packet Page. 572
Ordinance No. MC-1661
2 WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino would also explore the assessment of Transient Occupancy Taxes on banned Short Term Rental locations within the City of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, the City would employ the use of third-party software to track, identify, and accurately display Short Term Rental activities within the City and within community districts and ensure that everyone is held accountable to play by the same set of rules, follow all guidelines and ordinances, and pay their fair share of fees and taxes; and WHEREAS, on December 9, 2025, pursuant to the requirements of Section 19.52.040 (Hearings and Appeals – Hearing Procedures) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, the Planning Commission held a duly-noticed public hearing at which interested persons had an opportunity to testify in support of, or opposition to Development Code Amendment 25-09 and at which meeting, the Planning Commission considered Development Code Amendment 25-09 and adopted Resolution No. 2025-059 rejecting the ban on Short Term Rentals.

THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 2. Finding of Facts
Finding No. 1: The proposed ban on Short Term and vacation rentals is consistent with the General Plan.

Finding of Fact: The proposed Ordinance banning Short Term and vacation rentals in the city is consistent with the General Plan, as follows:

Land Use Goal 2.1: Preserve and enhance San Bernardino’s unique Neighborhoods.

Land Use Goal 2.2: Promote development that integrates with and minimizes impacts on surrounding land uses.

San Bernardino contains a wide range of neighborhoods accommodating an assortment of lifestyles. Each neighborhood has, or can have, its own unique character that is a source of pride for the residents. Neighborhood characteristics are defined by many factors: what the neighborhood looks like, what it feels like, and how well it is maintained. But more importantly, it is an image in the minds of those who live and work there and in the perceptions of those who visit the neighborhoods.

The rise of short-term rentals within the City has generated discussions as to their impact on the general character of neighborhoods in which they may be located and the cost of city services to monitor them.

Packet Page. 573
Ordinance No. MC-1661
3 The adoption of an Ordinance banning Short Term and vacation Rentals preserves the integrity and character of the residential neighborhoods in which they are located, and prevents negative impacts such as excessive noise, littering, loitering on the residential neighborhoods and the community at large.

Finding No. 2: The proposed Ordinance banning Short Term and vacation rentals would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City.

Finding of Fact: An Ordinance banning Short Term and vacation rentals is in the interest or furtherance of the public health, safety, convenience, and general welfare in that it preserves the residential characteristics of residential zoning districts while mitigating the harm to the residential zoning districts that result from the negative impacts of the use.

SECTION 3. Amendment. Section 19.02.050 of the San Bernardino Development Code and Chapter 19.04 of the San Bernardino Development Code are hereby revised as set forth in Exhibits A, B, and C, all attached hereto and incorporated herein by these references.

SECTION 4. Certification. The City Clerk of the City of San Bernardino shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause publication to occur in a newspaper of general circulation and published and circulated in the City in a manner permitted under Section 36933 of the Government Code of the State of California.

SECTION 5. Compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. The Mayor and City Council, having independently reviewed and analyzed the record before it, including written and oral testimony, and having exercised their independent judgment, finds that there is no substantial evidence supporting a fair argument that approval of the ban on Short Tern and vacation rentals will result in a significant effect on the environment, and thus the project is exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b) of the California Environmental Quality Act guidelines due to the fact that the activity does not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change to the environment.

SECTION 6. Notice of Exemption: The Planning Division of the Community Development and Housing Department is hereby directed to file a Notice of Exemption with the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino within five (5) working days of final approval certifying the City’s compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act in approving Ordinance MC-1661.

SECTION 7. Severability: If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance, or any part thereof, is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The Mayor and City Council hereby declare that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase be declared Packet Page. 574
Ordinance No. MC-1661
4 unconstitutional. If for any reason any portion of this Ordinance is found to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the balance of this Ordinance shall not be affected.

SECTION 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption.

APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk this 17th day of June , 2026.

Helen Tran, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Attest:

Telicia Lopez, CMC, City Clerk
Approved as to form:

Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney
Packet Page. 575
Ordinance No. MC-1661
5 CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
I, Telicia Lopez, CMC, City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Ordinance No. MC-1661, introduced by the City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, at a regular meeting held the 15th day of April 2026. Ordinance No. MC-1661 was approved, passed and adopted at a regular meeting held the 17
th day of June, 2026 by the following vote:

Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT

SANCHEZ
IBARRA

FIGUEROA

SHORETT
KNAUS
FLORES
ORTIZ
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino, this 18 th day of June, 2026.

Telicia Lopez, CMC, City Clerk
Packet Page. 576
Ordinance No. MC-1661
6 EXHIBIT A
Development Code Section 19.02.050
(Definitions)
Section 19.02.050 (Definitions) shall be modified to read as follows:
“19.02.050 DEFINITIONS
The words and phrases set out in this section, when used in this Development Code, shall, for the purposes of this Development Code only, have the following respective meanings. These definitions do not apply to any other chapter of the Municipal Code, and the same words and phrases may have different meanings in other chapters of the Municipal Code. …
Agent. A person or entity, who does not hold any interest in the property and who has authority to act on behalf of the owner.
…
Bedroom. A room designed primarily for sleeping that meets the definition of the California Building Codes currently adopted by the City.
…
Check-in. The arrival of a guest at a vacation-rental property or agent’s office. …
Guest House. Living quarters, having no kitchen facilities, located on the same premises with a main building and occupied for the sole use of members of the family, temporary guest, or persons permanently employed on the premises. This definition shall not include ADUs built subject to Section 19.04.030(2)(P) (Accessory Dwelling Units). …
Home-Sharing. The rental of bedrooms in a residential unit for a term of 29 or fewer consecutive days while the owner of the unit is present and living in the unit. …
Hosting Platform. A person or entity who participates in vacation rentals by collecting or receiving a fee, directly or indirectly through an agent or intermediary, for conducting a booking transaction using any medium of facilitation. Examples include, but are not limited to, VRBO.com, Airbnb.com, homestay.com and other internet and non-internet-based services that facilitate bookings for a fee.
…
Multi-Family Residential. Two (2) or more dwelling units in a single building on a site.

Packet Page. 577
Ordinance No. MC-1661
7 …
Owner. A person or entity, who holds record fee title to the property, except that “owner” does not include the holder of a leasehold interest in the property. …
Responsible Party. The lessee of a vacation-rental property. …
Short-Term Rental or Short-Term Rental Property. A residential dwelling unit that is leased for a term of 29 or fewer consecutive days.”

Packet Page. 578
Ordinance No. MC-1661

EXHIBIT B
Development Code Section 19.04.020
(Permitted, Development Permitted, and Conditionally Permitted Uses)

19.04.020 (Permitted, Development Permitted, and Conditionally Permitted Uses); Table 04.01 (Residential Zones – Permitted, Development Permitted, and Conditionally Permitted Uses) shall be modified to read as follows:
“TABLE 04.01

PERMITTED, DEVELOPMENT PERMITTED, AND

CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USES

LAND USE ACTIVITY RE RL RS RS RM RMH RH RS
H

1. Residential Uses
A. Community Care Facility (6 or less) P P P P P P P X
B. Condominium or Townhouse D D D D D D D X
C. Convalescent Homes X X X C D D D X
D. Day Care Center C C C
E. Day Care Homes, Family
8 or less children
9 to 15 children

P P P P P P P X

D D D D D D D X
F. Dormitories/Fraternity/Sorority X X X X C C C X
G. Homeless Facilities X X X X C C C X
H. Manufactured Housing D D D D D D D X
I. Mobile Home Parks or Subdivisions D D D D D D D X
J. Multi-Family Dwellings X X X D D D D X
K. Multi-Family Dwellings, Existing X X X P P P P X
L. Planned Residential Developments X X X D D D D X
M. Accessory Dwelling Unit P P P P P P P P
N. Senior Citizen/Congregate Care Housing X X X D D D D D O. Single-Family Dwellings D D D D D D D X
P. Single-Family Dwellings, Existing P P P P P P P X
Q. Small Lot Subdivision X X X D D D D X
R. Student Housing Complex X X X X X X X C
R. Short-Term Rentals X X X X X X X X
”
Packet Page. 579
Ordinance No. MC-1661

EXHIBIT C
Development Code Section 19.04.030(2)
(Residential Zones Specific Standards)

19.04.030(2) (Residential Zones Specific Standards); Table 04.03 (Residential Zones Specific Standards) shall be modified to read as follows:
“TABLE 04.03

RESIDENTIAL ZONES SPECIFIC STANDARDS
Specific Standards RE RL RS RU RM RMH RH RSH CO CG-2 CR-2 A. Accessory Structure + + + + + + +

+ + +
B. Day Care Facility + + + + + + + + + +
C. Day Care Home,
Large Family
+ + + + + + +
D. Density
Bonus/Affordable
+ + + + + + + + + +
Housing or Amenities
E. Front/Rear Yard + + + + +
Averaging
F. Golf Courses & Related + + + + + + +
Facilities
G. Guest House + + + +
H. Minimum Room Size + + + + + + + + + +
I. Minimum Dwelling
Size
+ + + + + + + + + +
J. Mobile Home & + + + + + + +
Manufactured Housing
K. Mobile Home Park or + + + + + + +
Subdivision
L. Multiple Family
Housing
+ + + + + +
M. Multi-Family Housing,
Existing
+ + + +
N. Planned Residential +
Development
O. Recreational Vehicle + + + + + + +
Storage
P. Second Accessory + + + + + + +
Dwelling Unit
Q. Senior Citizen/ + + + + + + +
Congregate Care
Housing

R. Single-Family
Dwellings, Existing
+ + + + + + + + + +
S. Small Lot Subdivisions +
T. Social Service Uses/ + + + + + +
Centers
U. Vocational/Trade
Schools
+
V. Student Housing
Complex
+
W. Urban Lot Splits + + +
X. Two-Unit Projects + + +
Y. Short-Term Rentals + + + + + + +

Key: “+” applies in the zone.”
Packet Page. 580
Deckard Technologies, Inc. MSA 2-9-2026

MASTER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Master Professional Services Agreement (the "Agreement") is made and entered into as of ______________________ (the “Effective Date”) by and between Deckard Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Deckard”), having its principal offices located at 1620 5th Avenue, Suite 400, San Diego, CA 92101 and the City of San Bernardino, CA (“Client”), having its principal offices at 201 North “E” Street, San Bernardino, CA 92401.

RECITALS
WHEREAS, Deckard provides advanced data analytics and technology solutions for real estate through its proprietary Rentalscape platform (the “Platform”); WHEREAS, Client desires to engage Deckard to perform the services described in SOWs attached to this Agreement in accordance with the terms and conditions hereof; NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows:

1. Statements of Work.

1.1. Client hereby retains Deckard and Deckard hereby agrees to use the Platform to perform certain data analytics services (the “Services”), which shall be specified in writing in statement(s) of work executed by the parties hereto (each an “SOW”). The SOW for the initial Services to be performed by Deckard is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Each subsequent SOW shall be signed by both parties and shall set forth, upon terms mutually agreeable to the parties, the specific Services to be performed by Deckard, the timeline and schedule for the performance of such Services and the compensation to be paid by Client to Deckard for the provision of such Services, as well as any other relevant terms and conditions. If a SOW includes the development of specific work product, the specifications of such work product shall be set forth on the relevant SOW. The parties shall attach a copy of each Statement of Work to this Agreement and each such SOW shall be incorporated herein by reference. Any changes to an SOW shall be in writing, executed by each party (each a “Change Order”), attached to the original SOW and incorporated therein and attached hereto as part of Exhibit A. All such executed SOWs and Change Orders are subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, are incorporated herein, and made a part hereof. In the event of any conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any SOW or Change Order the terms of this Agreement shall control.

1.2. Deckard agrees to apply Deckard’s best efforts to the performance of Services under this Agreement competently and professionally, and will deliver the work product as set forth in the applicable SOW. Deckard shall devote such time and attention to the performance of Deckard’s duties under this Agreement, as shall reasonably be required by Client, or as customary in the software industry.

2. Performance of Services. In carrying out the Services, Deckard shall fully comply with any and all applicable codes, laws and regulations and, if applicable, the rules of the site at which the Services are performed. Deckard shall provide a project manager who shall oversee the day-to-day performance of the Services and ensure the orderly performance of the Services consistent with each SOW and this Agreement. Deckard’s project manager shall reasonably cooperate with Client’s project manager and keep him or her informed of the work progress.

Packet Page. 581
Deckard Technologies, Inc. MSA 2-9-2026

3. Fees.

3.1. Client shall pay all fees in the amount and in the time periods set forth in the applicable SOW. In no event shall the fees payable to Deckard hereunder exceed any maximum amount set out in the SOW. Client shall reimburse Deckard for actual and reasonable expenses incurred in performing the Services that are set forth in an SOW or otherwise approved in advance by Client, including meals, incidental expenses and reasonable travel costs incurred for travel in such amounts as authorized by the Federal or specified State or local travel regulations. Original receipts must be presented with any invoice for such costs and/or expenses and Deckard shall attest that the costs and/or expenses are actual and allocated to the Services.

3.2. Deckard agrees to use commercially reasonable efforts to ensure that invoices comply with the form, timeliness and any supporting certification requirements that are provided to Deckard by Client in writing from time to time during the Term. Unless otherwise specified in an SOW, Client shall pay all invoices within 30 days of Client’s receipt of such invoice.

3.3. Client agrees that custom development requests outside of the scope of work may incur a fee of $250 hourly rate at a minimum of 2 hours of labor. Client agrees that custom requests may or may not be released on the original agreed upon release date.

4. Taxes. Deckard acknowledges that as an independent contractor, Deckard may be required by law to make payments against estimated income or other taxes due federal, state and other governments.

Deckard agrees to bear any and all expenses, including legal and professional fees, increased taxes, penalties and interest that Deckard or Client may incur as a result of any attempt to challenge or invalidate Deckard’s status as an independent contractor, and Deckard agrees to defend, and hold Client harmless from any liability thereon.

5. Term and Termination.

5.1. The term of this Agreement (“Term”) shall commence on the Effective Date and shall continue in force and effect for a period of one year; the Term shall be automatically renewed thereafter for additional periods of one year each unless terminated by either party by giving written notice of termination to the other party not less than 60 days before the end of the then-current period. Termination shall have no effect on Client’s obligation to pay the applicable labor rate with respect to Services rendered prior to the effective date of termination.

5.2. Termination. This Agreement shall be terminated as follows:

5.2.1. By either party by giving the other party 60 days prior written notice; provided that, such termination shall not be effective until each and every SOW then outstanding shall have been fully performed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the SOW.

5.2.2. Upon the entering into or filing by or against either party of a petition, arrangement, or proceeding seeking an order for relief under the bankruptcy laws of the United States, a receivership for any of the assets of the other party, an assignment for the benefit of its creditors, or the dissolution, liquidation, or insolvency of the other party.

5.2.3. Client may terminate this Agreement or any SOW if Deckard materially breaches this Agreement or the applicable SOW and fails to cure such breach to Client’s reasonable satisfaction within 30 days of Deckard receipt of written notice thereof.

Packet Page. 582
Deckard Technologies, Inc. MSA 2-9-2026

5.3. Continuation. This Agreement shall continue in full force and effect following the termination of any SOW, unless otherwise agreed by the parties.

5.4. Post Termination Obligations. Upon the expiration or termination of this Agreement or any SOW for any reason, Deckard shall: (i) carry out an orderly winding down of the affected work; (ii) deliver to Client the applicable work/deliverables not previously delivered in its then current form and any documents or other information in whatever manner related thereto, (iii) return any property of the Client then in Deckard’s possession; and (iv) submit a final invoice to Client for any Services performed prior to the date of such termination and as otherwise permitted by this Agreement. Client shall pay Deckard those amounts due for Services performed up to the date of termination.

6. Cooperation. Deckard expressly agrees that it shall reasonably cooperate with and assist Client in: (a) responding to any inquiry or claim by or from any Federal, State or local government agency regarding the performance of this Agreement; and/or (b) exercising any rights that Client may have to pursue any remedies available to it under any applicable Federal, State or local law or regulation.

7. Deckard Personnel. Deckard shall perform all Services in a professional and workmanlike manner by individuals qualified to perform the Services. Deckard may, at its discretion, subcontract with other companies or individuals to carry out some part of the Services, provided that Deckard shall remain responsible for the oversight of all work performed.

8. Relationship of the Parties. Deckard is, and at all times during the term of this Agreement shall be, an independent contractor of Client. Deckard shall not represent to any Client customer or other person or entity that it has any right, power or authority to create any contract or obligation, either express or implied, on behalf of, or binding upon Client or to any way modify the terms and conditions of any SOW. This Agreement shall not create or in any way be interpreted to create a partnership, joint venture, or formal business organization of any kind between the parties.

9. Representations and Warranties.

9.1. Deckard represents and warrants that:

9.1.1. Deckard shall perform all Services in a competent, professional, workman-like manner and in accordance with the governing SOW and any applicable industry and/or professional standards;

9.1.2. It has the legal right and authority to enter into this Agreement and perform the Services under any SOW under which it agrees to perform Services;

9.1.3. Upon execution by an authorized representative, this Agreement will be a binding agreement, enforceable against Deckard in accordance with its terms; and

9.1.4. Entering into this Agreement or performing work under a particular SOW shall not violate any agreement (written or implied) with any third party.

9.2. Client represents and warrants that:

9.2.1. It has the legal right and authority to enter into this Agreement and to deliver the Data to Deckard to perform the Services;
Packet Page. 583
Deckard Technologies, Inc. MSA 2-9-2026

9.2.2. Upon execution by an authorized representative, the Agreement will be a binding Agreement, enforceable against Client in accordance with its terms; and

9.2.3. Entering into this Agreement or performing work under a particular SOW shall not violate any agreement (written or implied) with any third party.

These warranties shall survive inspection, acceptance, and payment and are in addition to all other warranties expressed or implied by law.

10. Nondisclosure of Confidential Information. During the performance of this Agreement certain proprietary, technical and financial information may be disclosed by one party (“Disclosing Party”) to the other party (“Receiving Party”) and shall be deemed proprietary if marked with a conspicuous legend identifying it as proprietary or confidential information (“Confidential Information”). The Receiving Party shall not use less than the same efforts to prevent the disclosure of Confidential Information received hereunder as is used to protect its own Confidential Information, and in no event, however, less than a reasonable degree of care. Disclosure of Confidential Information received hereunder shall be restricted to those individuals who are directly participating in the performance of the Services under this Agreement. Confidential Information shall not include information that the Receiving Party can demonstrate by competent evidence is (a) rightfully known to the Receiving Party without obligations of non-disclosure, prior to receipt of such information from the Disclosing Party; (b) independently developed by the Receiving Party without the benefit or use of the Confidential Information furnished by the Disclosing Party, or obtained in good faith from a third party having no obligation to keep such information confidential; or (c) publicly known through no breach of this Agreement. Receiving Party may disclose Confidential Information when required by operation of law or pursuant to the order of a governmental agency, but only upon prior written notice to the other party to allow the other party the opportunity to take appropriate legal measures to protect the Confidential Information. The parties acknowledge that any unauthorized use or disclosure of the Confidential Information may cause irreparable damage to the other Party, for which there is no adequate remedy at law, and shall entitle the other Party to obtain immediate injunctive relief without any requirement to post bond, in addition to all other available remedies.

11. Liability Limitations; Disclaimer. ALL DELIVERABLES PROVIDED TO CLIENT BY DECKARD UNDER THIS AGREEMENT ARE PROVIDED “AS IS” WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, WHETHER EXPRESS, IMPLIED, STATUTORY OR OTHERWISE. IN NO EVENT SHALL

EITHER PARTY OR ITS RESPECTIVE EMPLOYEES, REPRESENTATIVES OR SUBSIDIARIES BE

LIABLE FOR ANY CONSEQUENTIAL, INDIRECT, PUNITIVE, INCIDENTAL OR SPECIAL DAMAGES,

WHETHER FORESEEABLE OR UNFORESEEABLE, AND WHETHER OR NOT SUCH PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. THE TOTAL LIABILITY OF EACH

PARTY ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNT PAID BY CLIENT TO DECKARD UNDER THIS AGREEMENT.

12. Indemnification. Deckard shall indemnify and hold Client harmless from and against any third party claims against and damages incurred by Client that are finally awarded by a court of competent jurisdiction (including reasonable attorneys’ fees) as a result of (a) injury or death to persons, or loss of or damage to property caused by the acts of Deckard or its agents; (b) a claim that the Services infringe the intellectual property rights of any third party; and (c) any violation by Deckard, its employees, agents, representatives or any person or entity acting on its behalf of any, Federal, State and/or local law, or regulation. Deckard shall be entitled to assume control of the settlement, compromise, negotiation and defense of any claim, and in such case, Deckard shall not enter into any settlement of any claim or action that adversely affects Client’s business or interests without its prior approval, which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. Client shall indemnify and hold Deckard harmless from and against Packet Page. 584
Deckard Technologies, Inc. MSA 2-9-2026
any third party claims against and damages incurred by Deckard that are finally awarded by a court of competent jurisdiction (including reasonable attorneys’ fees) as a result of (a) injury or death to persons, or loss of or damage to property caused by the acts of Client, its customers or its agents; (b) any violation by Client, its customers, employees, agents, representatives or any person or entity acting on its behalf of any, Federal, State and/or local law, or regulation. Client shall be entitled to assume control of the settlement, compromise, negotiation and defense of any claim, and in such case, Client shall not enter into any settlement of any claim or action that directly affects Deckard’s business or interests without its prior approval, which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed.

13. Proprietary Rights. The results of the Services delivered to Client in the form delivered to Client, including all reports, technical communications, drawings, records, charts, or other materials originated or prepared by Deckard for Client in performing the Services (all of the foregoing, collectively, the “Work Product”) shall be the property of Client, and Deckard hereby assigns all rights to such Work Product to Client. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing and subject to Deckard’s confidentiality obligations under this Agreement, Client acknowledges that the Work Product will include the aggregation and analysis of certain publicly available data and agrees that nothing contained in this Agreement shall be interpreted to prohibit Deckard from using its technology and other intellectual property to analyze the same or similar publicly available information for third parties. In addition, to the extent that Deckard incorporates any Deckard Property (as defined below), including any pre-existing or copyrighted work of Deckard into the Work Product, such Deckard Property shall remain the property of Deckard. Deckard grants to Client a perpetual, royalty-free, irrevocable, worldwide, non-exclusive license to use such Deckard Property in connection with exercising the rights of ownership granted to Client under this Agreement. In addition, nothing herein shall grant to Client any rights in the Platform or any other proprietary technologies and intellectual property used by Deckard in preparing any Work Product (“Deckard Property”).

14. Governing Law. This Agreement and all disputes relating to this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California, except as to any provisions of this Agreement that are properly governed by the laws of the United States. All controversies or disputes arising out of this Agreement shall be heard in either the state or federal courts sitting in San Diego County, California. THE PARTIES HERETO KNOWINGLY AND IRREVOCABLY WAIVE THEIR RIGHT TO A TRIAL BY JURY.

15. Assignment. Deckard shall not assign, transfer or sell its rights or obligations under the Agreement without Client’s prior written consent, which shall not be unreasonably withheld; provided that such consent shall not be required if the assignment is in connection with the sale of all or substantially all of Deckard’s business to which this Agreement relates, whether by merger, sale of stock, sale of assets or otherwise.

16. Severability; Survival. If any part, term, or provision of the Agreement is held invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the remainder of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect as if the Agreement has been executed with the invalid portion thereof eliminated. Upon termination or expiration of this Agreement, the terms and conditions set out in Sections 5.4, 8, and 10 through 22 will survive such termination.

17. Waiver of Breach. The waiver of a breach of the Agreement or the failure of a party to exercise any right under the Agreement shall in no event constitute a waiver of any other breach, whether similar or dissimilar in nature, or prevent the exercise of any right under the Agreement.

18. Force Majeure. Neither party shall be liable for any failure to perform, or delay in performing, any of its obligations hereunder due to causes beyond its reasonable control, and without the fault or negligence of that party. Such causes shall include, without limitation, Acts of God, acts of civil or military Packet Page. 585
Deckard Technologies, Inc. MSA 2-9-2026
authority, fire, flood, epidemic, pandemic, quarantine, freight embargo, civil commotion or acts of war, declared or undeclared.

19. Compliance with Laws. Each party agrees to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws and executive orders and regulations issued pursuant thereto and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the other party harmless from any claim, suit, loss, cost, damage, expense (including reasonable attorney’s fees), or liability by reason of the other party’s violation of this provision.

20. Dispute Resolution. In the event of a claim or dispute between the parties arising under this Agreement, such claim or dispute shall be settled by mutual agreement between the senior management of the parties, If an agreement is not reached within a reasonable time, except as otherwise provided in this section, any dispute concerning the terms and conditions of this Agreement may be resolved by pursuing any right or remedy available at law or in equity in accordance with this Agreement. Deckard shall, at all times, proceed diligently with the performance of the Services hereunder. Notwithstanding the above, Client’s contract with a governmental entity may include a disputes clause under FAR 52.233- 01 (the “Disputes Clause”), pursuant to which a prime contractor may pursue certain procedures in the event of a dispute between the customer and Client with respect to questions of law or fact relating to the government contract. In such case, all Deckard claims, controversies or disputes concerning matters that are subject to the Disputes Clause of the government contract shall be governed solely by such disputes clause Deckard shall be responsible for providing any and all certifications required by law or Client to enable Client or its customer to verify, support, or confirm such certifications. Both parties agree that the occurrence of a dispute under the Disputes Clause shall not interfere with either party’s performance or other obligations under this Agreement.

21. Entire Agreement. This Agreement and each SOW issued hereunder represent the entire understanding and agreement between the parties hereto and supersede all other prior written or oral agreements made by or on behalf of Client or Deckard. In the event of a conflict between the terms and conditions of this Agreement and any SOW, the Agreement shall control, unless the SOW expressly provides that it is intended to modify the Agreement. Deckard’s proposals shall not be part of this Agreement unless specifically referenced in the SOW and agreed to in writing by Client. This Agreement may be modified only by written agreement signed by the authorized representatives of the parties.

22. Communications and Notices. Other than communications required to be made by Deckard’s project manager to Client’s project manager, all notices, orders, directives, requests or other communications of the parties in connection with this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be provided as follows:

Packet Page. 586
Deckard Technologies, Inc. MSA 2-9-2026
In the case of Client: In the case of Deckard
________________________ Nickolas R. Del Pego, CEO
________________________ 1620 Fifth Ave Suite 400
________________________ San Diego, CA 92101
________________________ [email protected]

23. Media and/or Logo Use. Client agrees that Deckard shall have the right to use Client’s name and logo on website, marketing materials and advertisements. In addition, Client and Deckard will work together to identify appropriate testimonials to promote Rentalscape and to generate announcements, press engagements and public speaking events with respect to the benefits of the Services. Client shall have the right to revoke Deckard’s right to use its name and logo by providing Deckard with 30 days’ advance written notice. Upon the expiration or termination of this Agreement the rights set forth in this Section 23 shall terminate. [Signature Page Follows]
Packet Page. 587
Deckard Technologies, Inc. MSA 2-9-2026
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Deckard and Client have each caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives, effective as of the dates indicated below.

DECKARD TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

By:

Print Name:

Date:

Title:

CLIENT
By:

Print Name:

Date:

Title:

Packet Page. 588
Deckard Technologies, Inc. MSA 2-9-2026

EXHIBIT A

STATEMENT OF WORK
This Statement of Work (“SOW”) will be effective as of the last date of signature below, and upon execution will be incorporated into the Master Services Agreement between Deckard Technologies, Inc. and the City of San Bernardino, CA dated [EFFECTIVE DATE OF MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT] (the “Master Agreement”). Capitalized terms used in this SOW will have the same meaning as set forth in the Agreement.

1. Short Term Rental Service. Client desires to engage Deckard to use the Rentalscape Platform to prepare real estate property data for short-term rentals (“STRs”) on all identifiable properties within the City of San Bernardino in the State of California based upon publicly available data and such other data relevant to the Designated Geography to be provided to the client by Deckard (reports accessible from Rentalscape). The Reports shall include at a minimum:

1.1. Information on STRs currently active in the Designated Geography;

1.2. The aggregate revenue from actively listed bookings;

1.3. The average number of nights booked per reservation;

1.4. The major platforms used by STR hosts;

1.5. Average daily rates;

1.6. Booking trends during the Reporting Period;

1.7. Identify, by address, the following violations of STR ordinances within the Designated Geography;

1.7.1. Listings or advertisements that do not include an STR permit number;

1.7.2. Listings or advertisements that represent or offer occupancy in excess of the occupancy maximums in the Designated Geography; and

1.7.3. Properties advertised as STRs that are only permitted as long-term rentals;

1.8. Identify the actively listed STRs by month and address;

1.9. The total number of properties actively listed in the Designated Geography each month during the Reporting Period;

1.10. List the property owners; and

1.11. List the permit history of each property offering STRs in the Designated Geography.

2. Designated Geography. San Bernardino, CA
Packet Page. 589
Deckard Technologies, Inc. MSA 2-9-2026

3. Reporting Period. Reports available in the Rentalscape Platform throughout the year.

4. Fees; Payments.

4.1.         Annual Software Subscription: $8,500 (Identification, Compliance Monitoring and Rental Activity based on properties that are listed in Rentalscape as identified STRs). We approximate 135 properties by the end of year one as being Monitored in Rentalscape.

4.2.         Outreach Campaign: Included to drive compliance. Three letter campaign to inform and encourage property owners to become compliant with the Registration Process.

4.3. 24/7 Live Hotline & Online Form. $5,000 annually. Classic Level Live Answered Hotline and Online Form that can dispatch to responsible parties depending on identified call and form flow.

4.4.         Maximum Price:  In no event will the total subscription fees in the first year exceed $13,500. Future years’ renewals will be subject to an annual increase.

4.5.      Timing:  Client will pay the annual subscription fees within 30 days of receipt of invoices from Deckard.

All terms and conditions of the Agreement will apply to this SOW. This SOW will be effective as of the date of the last signature below.

SOW AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:

DECKARD TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

By:

Print Name:

Date:

Title:

CLIENT
By:

Print Name:

Date:

Title:

Packet Page. 590

CONSENT CALENDAR
City of San Bernardino
Request for Council Action
Date: June 17, 2026
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Gabriel Elliott, Director of Community Development & Housing Department: Community Development & Housing
Subject: Contract Amendment and Project Status Update for the Accela Land Management Services Project in the Amount
of $338,333.33 (All Wards)
Recommendation:

It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California,

1. Approve the following services for the Land Management Project:
a) A Managed Services agreement for Tier 2/3 Accela support for a period of 18 months in an amount not to exceed $180,000; and
b) An Accela OpenCounter subscription for a period of 18 months in an amount not to exceed $158,333.33; for a combined not-to-exceed amount of $338,333.33 Approval is subject to confirmation of the correct contracting party for Managed Services, since the attached scope references TruePoint Managed Services and not simply an amendment to the original Gray Quarter implementation agreement; and

2. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to sign the agreements, make ministerial revisions and any subsequent amendments to the scope of work without increasing the contract award amount, subject to the review and approval by the City Attorney as to form.

City Manager's Comments
The City Manager requests City Council authorization.

Executive Summary
The City previously approved an integrated Accela Land Management System project intended to modernize permitting, planning, building and safety, public works, inspections, business registration, and related land management functions.

Packet Page. 591
The Business Registration portion of the system went live in 2025. Other LMS functions remain in implementation and require a current status update before additional services are approved.

Staff is requesting approval of two additional services: Managed Services support in an amount not to exceed $180,000 and an Accela OpenCounter subscription in an amount not to exceed $158,333.33, for a combined total of $338,333.33.

Because the original LMS project involved significant ARPA and IT budget funding, this report provides a reconciliation of the original Council approval, contract amounts, expenditures to date, remaining balances, current module status, and the reason the additional services are being requested.

On November 20, 2024, Mayor and City Council approved the implementation of an integrated Land Management System (LMS) in a not-to-exceed amount of $3,200,000, for the term beginning January 1, 2025 and ending June 30, 2027. Council also authorized the City Manager, or designee, to sign the agreements, make ministerial revisions and any subsequent amendments to the scope of work without increasing the contract award amount, subject to the review and approval by the City Attorney as to form.

Additionally, council authorized the City Manager, or designee, to execute seven (7) optional one-year amendments at approximately $500,000 annually for FYs 2026-27 through 2032-33, and to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Onsite Computing for data conversion services for an amount not to exceed $520,000 (includes a 10% contingency) and execute all documents to effectuate the Agreement for the term beginning January 1, 2025 and ending December 31, 2026.

Finally council authorized the City Manager, or designee, to execute Professional Services Agreements with Willdan, CSG Consultants, and Rick Engineering each for an amount not to exceed $448,800 respectively (includes a 10% contingency), for supplemental staffing and execute all documents to effectuate the Agreement for the term beginning January 1, 2025, and ending December 31, 2026.

Not included in the original contract are two crucial services provided Grey Quarter and Accela – a Managed Services Agreement to provide SLA-based support to the Business Registration and other city departments, including Public Works, Building & Safety, and Planning once the software testing period is over and the software goes “live”, to provide on-the-minute technical support during the “live” processing of the software; and an Open Counter Subscription Agreement with Accela which will replace the G-Wiz subscription that was part of the original contract.

What is under consideration are an 18-month agreement for the Managed Services to provide technical support and the Open Counter Subscription. For the Managed Services Agreement, the amount proposed for the 18-month subscription is $180,000, which breaks down to $120,000 annually plus six months. For the Open Counter Packet Page. 592
Subscription, the amount proposed is $158.000, consisting of $58,000 for the remainder of the 2026 year, and $100,000 for the year 2027.

On July 19, 2023 staff presented an ARPA Update to the Mayor and City Council. At that time, $10,000,000 in ARPA funds was allocated to fund the City’s Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems for financial, budgeting, human capital management and the Land Management system (LMS) to improve citywide operations, streamline processes related to permitting, building safety, and other land management functions.

The LMS will replace outdated systems like PermitsPlus, which has been in place for more than 20 years and lacks the flexibility and automation necessary for modern city planning. These improvements aim to enhance efficiency, transparency, and service delivery for managing land-related activities in the City, making it easier for officials and the public to access and track relevant information. Staff’s estimate that a system able to serve all of the permitting, building and safety, and other land management functions will cost approximately $5,000,000, of which $3,200,000 will be ARPA funded.

Discussion
In 2025, when the Accela Land Management system went “live” with the Business Registration Division, it became apparent that there is a need for support services to help resolve technical glitches and other anomalies typical with updating from an old Land Management System to a new one.

LMS Function
/ Module
Included in
Original Scope
Current Status GoLive
Date
Notes
Business
Registration
Yes Live 2025 First live module
Building &
Safety
Yes To be confirmed by
project team
TBD Must disclose status
Planning Yes To be confirmed by
project team
TBD Must disclose status
Public Works Yes To be confirmed by
project team
TBD Must disclose status
Permitting Yes To be confirmed by
project team
TBD Must disclose status
Inspections Yes To be confirmed by
project team
TBD Must disclose status
Code
Enforcement
Yes To be confirmed by
project team
TBD Must disclose status
Data
Conversion
Yes To be confirmed by
project team
TBD Must disclose records
converted and records
remaining
Packet Page. 593
A land management system helps municipalities organize and manage land use, development, and property information and handles important tasks like zoning, issuing building permits, keeping property records, and planning infrastructure like roads and utilities. The system ensures that land is used in a way that supports the community's goals, protects the environment, and provides necessary public services.

It also makes it easier to involve the public in land-related decisions, helping the municipality grow in a balanced and efficient way.

The Managed Services Agreement will allow the city to have on-the-spot support services for any interruptions or problems emanating from the software update to Accela. Grey Quarter, which is the implementation consulting firm for the Accela Software project, will provide the Manages Services support. The cost for an 18-month subscription, which will cover the go “live” implementation for all city department (Public Works, Building & Safety, Planning, and Business Registration through December 2027, is $180,000.

The Open Counter Subscription, offered by Accela, is a new web-based interactive program that streamlines the user experience of obtaining city permits and/or applying for discretionary approvals, and considered an improvement to the G-WIZ subscription which was part of the 2024 contract. An 18-month subscription for this servide is $158,000, consisting of $58,000 for the remainder of 2026 and $100,000 for 2027.

The City of San Bernardino currently operates with PermitsPlus for land management.

Current technological advancements have outpaced its capabilities, and the system is no longer being developed or supported by Accela, the product manufacturer. This leaves the City with outdated tools, limited functionality, and growing operational risks.

Transitioning to a modernized LMS will address key challenges such as outdated technology, fragmented processes, and difficulty in accessing real-time data. This initiative is part of the broader effort to modernize City operations and ensure long-term sustainability in land management activities.

Contract /
Vendor
Contract NTE Expended to
Date
Charged to
ARPA
Charged to
IT Fund
Remaining
Gray Quarter Inc.
/ Accela
Implementation
$2,100,336.00 $2,100,336.00 $2,100,336.00 $0 $0
Gray Quarter Inc.
/ G-Wiz
$767,675.00 $283,181.00 $283,181.00 $0 $484,494.00
Accela Planning &
Building SaaS
$473,280.00 $473,280.00 $0 $473,280.00 $0
Onsite Data
Conversion
$517,000.00 $314,955.00 $0 $314,955.00 $202,045.00
Packet Page. 594
Rick
Engineering
$448,800.00 $148,775.40 $0 $148,775.40 $300,024.60
CSG
Consultants
$448,800.00 $125,325.00 $0 $125,325.00 $323,475.00
Willdan $448,800.00 $124,754.00 $0 $124,754.00 $324,046.00 Total $5,204,691.00 $3,570,606.40 $2,383,517.00 $1,187,089.40 $1,634,084.60 The City has pre-paid $2,100,336 to Gray Quarter Inc. / Accela Implementation.

OpenCounter / G-Wiz Replacement
The original LMS project included G-Wiz. The proposed OpenCounter subscription is described as replacing G-Wiz. Before approval, staff should clarify whether G-Wiz has been paid for, whether G-Wiz will be discontinued, whether any credit or refund applies, and whether OpenCounter creates a duplicate cost or replaces a previously approved service.

Strategic Targets and Goals
Investments in the community using the American Rescue Plan funds support Key Strategic Goal 2. Focused, Aligned Leadership and Unified Community, b.

Evaluate operations and performance, investment in resources, technology, and tools to continually improve organizational efficiency and effectiveness; and Goal 3.

Improved Quality of Life.

Fiscal Impact

The original LMS project estimate approved by Council was $5,066,400. The proposed amendment adds $338,333.33 in new costs: $180,000 for Managed Services and $158,333.33 for OpenCounter.

Funding Sources Project/Vendor Amount

1. ARPA Land Management System $3,200,000

2. IT Adopted FY2024-25
Budget Onsite Computing – Data conversion $520,000

3. IT Adopted FY2024-25
Budget
Willdan – Supplemental staffing
CSG – Supplemental staffing
Rick Engineering Company –
Supplemental Staffing
$448,800
$448,800
$448,800
TOTAL PROJECT ESTIMATE $5,066,400
Conclusion
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California,

1. Approve the following services for the Land Management Project:

Packet Page. 595
a) A Managed Services agreement for Tier 2/3 Accela support for a period of 18 months in an amount not to exceed $180,000; and
b) An Accela OpenCounter subscription for a period of 18 months in an amount not to exceed $158,333.33; for a combined not-to-exceed amount of $338,333.33 Approval is subject to confirmation of the correct contracting party for Managed Services, since the attached scope references TruePoint Managed Services and not simply an amendment to the original Gray Quarter implementation agreement; and

Attachments
Attachment 1 Staff Report and Attachments for the Mayor and City Council meeting of November 20, 2024, regarding
software implementation.

Attachment 2 Managed Services Agreement with Grey Quarter Attachment 3 Open Counter agreement with Accela
Ward:

All Wards
Synopsis of Previous Council Actions:

On November 20, 2024, the Mayor and City Council approved a Professional Services Agreement between the City of San Bernardino and Gray Quarter, Inc, for the Accela Civic Implementation Platform
CC: Eric Levitt, City Manager
Packet Page. 596

DISCUSSION
City of San Bernardino
Request for Council Action
Date: November 20, 2024
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Rochelle Clayton, Acting City Manager;
C. Jeannie Fortune, Interim Director of Finance & Management Services
Gabriel Elliot, Community Development & Housing Director Department: Finance & Management Services
Subject: Approval of the Software and Implementation Services with Gray Quarter / Accela for the integration of a Land Management System, and Related Staffing Actions (All
Wards)
Recommendation:

It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California:

1. Approve the software and implementation services with Gray Quarter / Accela, for the implementation of an integrated Land Management System (LMS) in a not-toexceed amount of $3,200,000, for the term beginning January 1, 2025 and ending June 30, 2027;

2. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to sign the agreements, make ministerial revisions and any subsequent amendments to the scope of work without increase to the contract award amount, subject to the review and approval by the City Attorney as to form;

3. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute seven (7) optional one-year amendments at approximately $500,000 annually for FYs 2026-27 through 2032- 33;

4. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Onsite Computing for data conversion services for an amount not to exceed $520,000 (includes a 10% contingency) and execute all documents to Packet Page. 597
effectuate the Agreement for the term beginning January 1, 2025 and ending December 31, 2026; and

5. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute a Professional Services Agreements with Willdan, CSG Consultants, and Rick Engineering each for an amount not to exceed $448,800 respectively (includes a 10% contingency), for supplemental staffing and execute all documents to effectuate the Agreement for the term beginning January 1, 2025, and ending December 31, 2026.

Executive Summary
Upgrading to a modern land management system with permitting capabilities can help improve a local government's workflow, reduce risks, and improve stakeholder trust:
• Reduce risks - Land management systems can help reduce the likelihood of operational and reputational risks;
• Improve stakeholder trust - Land management systems can improve stakeholder trust, which can impact projects and schedules; • Improve workflow - Land management systems can automate routine tasks, which can improve workflow efficiency and reduce manual effort; • Improve compliance - Land management systems can help with compliance with local, state, and national legislation, regulatory requirements, and social obligations;
• Improve transparency - Land management systems can bring together subject matter experts into one process, allowing them to collaborate and communicate more effectively;
• Improve communication - Land management systems can improve communication between agency offices and concerned parties.

Background
The City of San Bernardino was awarded $77,656,407 under the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA). The City received half of the funds in May 2021, and the remainder of the funds in May of 2022. On July 19, 2023 staff presented an ARPA Update to the Mayor and City Council. At that time, $10,000,000 in ARPA funds was allocated to fund the City’s Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems for financial, budgeting, human capital management and the Land Management system (LMS) to improve citywide operations, streamline processes related to permitting, building safety, and other land management functions. The LMS will replace outdated systems like PermitsPlus, which has been in place for years but lacks the flexibility and automation necessary for modern city planning. These improvements aim to enhance efficiency, transparency, and service delivery for managing land-related activities in the City, making it easier for officials and the public to access and track relevant information. Staff’s estimate that a system able to serve all of the permitting, building and safety, and other land management functions will cost approximately $5,000,000, of which $3,200,000 will be ARPA funded.

Discussion
Packet Page. 598
A land management system helps municipalities organize and manage land use, development, and property information. It handles important tasks like zoning, issuing building permits, keeping property records, and planning infrastructure like roads and utilities. The system ensures that land is used in a way that supports the community's goals, protects the environment, and provides necessary public services. It also makes it easier to involve the public in land-related decisions, helping the municipality grow in a balanced and efficient way.

The City of San Bernardino currently operates with PermitsPlus for land management.

This system is outdated and limits the City’s ability to provide efficient and streamlined services to citizens and businesses. PermitsPlus is a legacy system that has served its purpose but is no longer viable due to its outdated infrastructure. Current technological advancements have outpaced its capabilities, and the system is no longer being developed or supported by Accela, the product manufacturer. This leaves the City with outdated tools, limited functionality, and growing operational risks.

SOFTWARE
RFP #F-23-78 was posted on October 16, 2023. At the time of the close of the RFP on November 30, 2023, proposals were received from 10 vendors:
• Accela
• Applications Software Technology, LLC
• CentralSquare Technologies, LLC
• Infor US, LLC
• MainStar
• Online Solutions, LLC
• The Davenport Group USA, LTD
• TruePoint Solutions
• Tyler Technologies
• Visionary Integration Professionals
The 10 proposals were evaluated by the LMS Project Management Firm, ClientFirst Technology Consulting, based on non-price factors such as alignment with the project scope, implementation approach, business process expertise, past experience, project management capabilities, consultant skills and experience, ability to meet functional requirements, and compliance with the City’s contract terms. The final decision was primarily based on how well each proposed solution met the City's overall functional requirements, as outlined in the RFP.

Accela's land management system is a cloud-based Software as a Service (SaaS) solution that helps government agencies and planning departments manage land use and planning processes such as Civic Application for Planning; this will automate and Packet Page. 599
streamline planning applications, zoning regulations, development projects, public engagement, plans review, and permit applications.

Accela has been selected to modernize the City’s land management and permitting systems, based on its strong reputation and extensive experience in government technology. With over 20 years of service and a client base of more than 600 government agencies globally, Accela is recognized for providing reliable, scalable solutions that improve operational efficiency and public service delivery. Accela’s proven track record in successfully transitioning municipalities from legacy systems to modern, integrated platforms was a key factor in its selection. The company's history and deep understanding of government processes ensure that the City will benefit from a trusted partner capable of supporting its long-term goals and evolving needs.

Accela Automation offers modern features that PermitsPlus lacks, such as integration with geographic information systems (GIS), mobile inspections, enhanced crossdepartmental workflows, and real-time updates for public and internal users. Field workers can perform inspections or updates even in areas without network access, which was previously impossible with PermitsPlus. This offline functionality will allow for work in remote areas and ensure faster project completion. The transition to Accela enables streamlined workflows, automated permit tracking, and reporting. For example, instead of manually managing tasks across multiple departments, Accela automates these functions, reducing errors and duplication of efforts.

Approval is requested to contract with Accela based upon RFP #F-23-78 issued by the City of San Bernardino on October 16, 2023. The effective date of the contract is January 1, 2025 through December 31, 2026 and has ten (10) optional one-year amendments.

DATA CONVERSION
Onsite Computing Inc. (OSCI) will assist the City of San Bernardino with its transition to the new Land Management System (LMS) within Accela. With over 20 years of experience serving businesses, non-profits, and government organizations in Southern California, OSCI offers expertise in areas such as cybersecurity, compliance, and data migration.

OSCI's proposal focuses on data extraction and conversion, supporting the transition of various records from existing systems like ESRI ArcGIS, PermitsPlus, Go Enforce, Go Gov, and Progressive Solutions into the new Accela LMS. The project involves migrating significant volumes of records, including building permits, inspections, planning projects, and business licenses, with a retention period of five years for each.

The proposed project cost is $520,000 (includes a 10% contingency), spanning two years, with a planned kick-off in January 2025 and completion by January 2027. This includes the establishment of secure cloud resources within AWS Gov-Cloud for data extraction and staging, ensuring a secure and compliant environment throughout the process. OSCI will also provide technical support and training for City staff to ensure a seamless transition.

Packet Page. 600

SUPPLEMENTAL STAFFING
Staff seeks approval to enter into a Professional Services Agreement with Willdan, CSG Consultants, and Rick Engineering Company for temporary staffing support during the implementation and integration of the City’s Land Management System (LMS). The contracted personnel will assist with daily operations, allowing City staff to focus on key tasks such as system integration, data migration, user training, and technical support. This temporary support will help ensure the smooth integration of the LMS into municipal functions, minimizing disruptions and meeting project deadlines.

For 60 years, Willdan has delivered engineering and energy solutions that have transformed the public sector, implementing over 100 utility programs and supporting 230,000 public entities. Willdan also specializes in providing skilled temporary staffing for large-scale projects, ensuring well-trained personnel maintain operational continuity. Temporary staffing is particularly important for departments like Community Development & Housing and Public Works, allowing City staff to focus on key tasks such as workflow validation, technical troubleshooting, and data migration without disrupting daily operations.

Since 1991, CSG Consultants has exclusively served public agencies, sharing their commitments to the members of their communities and seamlessly providing a wide range of municipal services—from planning to community preservation. CSG Consultants seamlessly delivers a wide range of municipal services and contract staff support to over 200 communities throughout California and Nevada, which includes providing contract staff support, entitlement services and project management. In November 2018, CSG Consultants announced that it would transition to a 100% employee-owned company. The decision to become an employee-owned company ensures their commitment to each of their clients.

For over 65 years, Rick Engineering Company has partnered with public and private entities to provide innovative engineering, planning, and design solutions across multiple disciplines. Rick Engineering has supported cities and municipalities with a range of services, including civil engineering, land use planning, transportation design, and environmental consulting. Their expertise ensures that complex projects, such as infrastructure improvements and urban development, are executed efficiently, helping public agencies achieve their operational and community goals.

Temporary staffing is crucial for the successful implementation of the Land Management System (LMS) in departments like Community Development & Housing and Public Works. In Community Development & Housing, the LMS transition involves migrating workflows related to permit applications, inspections, code enforcement, and public inquiries. While permanent staff focus on validating workflows, resolving system issues, and ensuring regulatory compliance, temporary staff will maintain daily Packet Page. 601
operations, such as permit issuance and zoning compliance. In Public Works, temporary staffing will support tasks like project documentation, plan reviews, and technical inquiries, allowing permanent staff to focus on validating engineering workflows and addressing system issues. This ensures operational continuity and uninterrupted services during the LMS integration.

The investment in temporary staffing, will be balanced by the benefits of ensuring uninterrupted services and the successful implementation of the LMS. Willdan's, CSG Consultants’, and Rick Engineering’s services are proposed for the period from January 2025 through December 2026.

The Agreement with Onsite Computing for data conversion services and Willdan and CSG Consultants for supplemental staffing is being brought forward for the Mayor and City Council's approval in accordance with Section 3.04.010 D.3. of the City's Municipal Code and Section V (e) of the City's Purchasing Policy (Attachment 4). As outlined in both the Municipal Code and Purchasing Policy, a purchase that is otherwise approved by the action of the Mayor and City Council in a public meeting is exempt from the City's Purchasing Policy.

Mayor, City Council and City Manager Goals and Objectives Investments in the community using the American Rescue Plan funds support Key Strategic Goal 2. Focused, Aligned Leadership and Unified Community, b. Evaluate operations and performance, investment in resources, technology, and tools to continually improve organizational efficiency and effectiveness; and Goal 3. Improved Quality of Life.

Fiscal Impact
The total estimated cost for the LMS Migration project is detailed below:

Funding Sources Project/Vendor Amount

1. ARPA Land Management System $3,200,000

2. IT Adopted FY2024-25
Budget Onsite Computing – Data conversion $520,000

3. IT Adopted FY2024-25
Budget
Willdan – Supplemental staffing
CSG Consultants – Supplemental
staffing
Rick Engineering Company –
Supplemental Staffing
$448,800
$448,800
$448,800
TOTAL PROJECT ESTIMATE $5,066,400
Approval of this project has no fiscal impact on the General Fund.

Conclusion
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California:

Packet Page. 602

1. Approve the software and implementation services with Gray Quarter / Accela, for the implementation of an integrated Land Management System (LMS) in the amount of $3,200,000, for the term beginning January 1, 2025, and ending June 30, 2027;

2. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to sign the agreement, make ministerial revisions and any subsequent amendments to the scope of work without increase to the contract award amount, subject to the review and approval by the City Attorney as to form;

3. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute seven (7) optional one-year amendments at approximately $500,000 annually for FYs 2026-27 through 2032- 33;

4. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Onsite Computing for data conversion services for an amount not to exceed $520,00 (includes a 10% contingency) and execute all documents to effectuate the Agreement for the term beginning January 1, 2025, and ending December 31, 2026; and

Attachments
Attachment 1: Accela Subscription Agreement
Attachment 2: Gray Quarter Subscription / EPH Subscription Agreements Attachment 3: Gray Quarter Professional Services Agreement Attachment 4: Purchasing Policy
Attachment 5: Professional Services Agreement Onsite Computing Inc.

Attachment 6: Professional Services Agreement Willdan Engineering Attachment 7: Professional Services Agreement CSG Consultants Attachment 8: Professional Services Agreement Rick Engineering Company Ward:

All Wards
Synopsis of Previous Council Actions:

N/A
Packet Page. 603
TruePoint Professional Services Terms CONFIDENTIAL

Page 1 of 5 ends

Mayor and City CouncilJune 17, 2026

Mayor and City Council
June 17, 2026