Agenda packet — San Jacinto City Council, June 16, 2026 (part 2 of 5)

STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) RESOLUTION NO. 4134
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss

CITY OF SAN JACINTO )

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN

JACINTO CONFIRMING DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT FOR
LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND PARK DISTRICT NO. 2 (LLPD NO. 2) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Jacinto has initiated proceedings for the levy and collection of assessments for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 for LLPD No. 2 pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 (commencing with Section 22500) of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code (the “Act”), which, among other things, scheduled a public hearing on the levy and collection of assessments on the lots and parcels of assessable property within LLPD No. 2 of the City of San Jacinto, and WHEREAS, notice of said hearing was given pursuant to Section 22626 and duly published as required by Sections 22552 and 22553 of said Code; and WHEREAS, at the time and place of said hearing, as set forth in said resolution of intention, the City Council held the hearing and afforded all interested persons an opportunity to be heard, and considered all oral statements and all written protests or communications made or filed by any interested persons, and at the conclusion of said hearing determined that a majority protest, to wit: written protests filed and not withdrawn by property owners owning more than 50 percent of the area of assessable land within LLPD No. 2, had not been received.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, determined and ordered by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto as follows:

SECTION 1. Findings. The City Council finds that:
(a) The foregoing recitals are true and correct;
(b) All of the applicable requirements of the Act have been satisfied;
(c) A majority protest to the levy and collection of the proposed assessment has not been filed;
(d) The City Council may therefore proceed to confirm the diagram and assessment for LLPD No. 2 for Fiscal Year
2026-2027, and order the levy and collection of the
assessment;
Resolution No. 4134

Page 2 of 4 ends

(e) The assessments proposed to be levied on the lots and parcels of assessable property within LLPD No. 2 for the maintenance and servicing of public street lighting, traffic signals, landscaping, graffiti removal, parks, and appurtenant facilities during Fiscal Year 2026-2027, as contained in the Engineer’s Report (the “report”) on file with the City Clerk, are based on the proportionate special benefit derived by such lots and parcels from the availability of such public improvements and facilities;
(f) the proportionate special benefit derived by each such lot or parcel has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance and servicing of such public improvements and facilities;
(g) such assessments do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such lot and parcel; and
(h) such assessments will not exceed the maximum amounts of the assessments authorized by a vote of the property
owners in LLPD No. 2.

SECTION 2. Levy of Assessment.

Pursuant to Section 22631 of the Streets and Highways Code, the adoption of this resolution constitutes the levy of the assessment for the maintenance and servicing of public street lighting, traffic signals, landscaping, graffiti removal, parks, and appurtenant facilities within LLPD No. 2 during Fiscal Year 2026-2027, as contained in the report, and such assessment is hereby levied. The City Clerk is directed to file a certified copy of this resolution together with the diagram and assessment contained in the report with the County Auditor of the County of Riverside, who, pursuant to Section 22645 of the Streets and Highways Code, shall enter on the County Assessment Roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon, as shown in said assessment.

Resolution No. 4134

Page 3 of 4 ends

APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of June 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

CITY OF SAN JACINTO:
__________________________________
Crystal Ruiz, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Julia Espinoza, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

City Attorney
Best Best & Krieger, LLP
Resolution No. 4134

Page 4 of 4 ends

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss

CITY OF SAN JACINTO )
I, Julia Espinoza, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 4134 was passed, approved, and adopted at the Regular Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council held on the 16th day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL on the 16th day of June 2026. ______________________________
Julia Espinoza, City Clerk
City of San Jacinto
Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report For:

Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
May 2026

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. ENGINEER’S LETTER ........................................................................................................1

2. OVERVIEW......................................................................................................................2

2.1 Introduction.............................................................................................................2

3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS ..................................................3

4. SUMMARY OF ESTIMATE OF COSTS.................................................................................4

5. ESTIMATE OF COSTS .......................................................................................................7

6. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT.......................................................................................8

6.1 Method of Apportionment......................................................................................8

6.2 Assessment Formula ...............................................................................................9

6.3 Assessment Unit Method........................................................................................9

6.4 Consumer Price Index (CPI) Inflation ....................................................................10

7. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM................................................................................................ 11

8. ASSESSMENT ROLL........................................................................................................ 12

Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 2

2. OVERVIEW

2.1 Introduction
The Report describes the District and the charge per Assessment Unit (AU) for Fiscal Year 2026/27 based on the historical and estimated cost to maintain the improvements and provide the services that benefit parcels within the District. This District, by special benefit assessments, provides funding for the installation, operation, maintenance, and servicing of: streetlights and traffic signals; landscaped areas (parkways, medians, open space, detention/retention basins, etc.); municipal parks; drainage facilities; graffiti removal from horizontal and vertical surfaces which are appurtenant to the above items; all of which are located in public rights-of-way or easements in the District. The District is divided into multiple zones to allow the assessments to properly match the special benefits provided by the improvements to the assessed parcels within the District.

The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own assessor’s property identification number by the Riverside County Assessor’s Office. The Riverside County Auditor/Controller uses assessor’s property identification numbers and specific fund numbers to identify on the tax roll properties assessed for special district benefit assessments.

Following consideration of public comments at a noticed public hearing and review of this Report, the City Council may confirm this Report as submitted and order the levy and collection of assessments for Fiscal Year 2026/27. If approved, the assessment information will be submitted to the County Auditor/Controller and included on the property tax roll for each benefiting parcel for Fiscal Year 2026/27.

Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 3

3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS
Plans and specifications for the improvements have been prepared and approved as part of the improvement plans. These plans and specifications are on file and available for review at the office of the City Clerk and, by reference, have been made part of this Report.

The City Council in the Resolutions of Initiation and Intent for Fiscal Year 2014/15, in accordance with the Streets and Highways Code Section 22622, added a flood control basin to the improvements maintained in Zone 38 (Coventry Acres). The flood control basin is composed of lots 1 through 12, inclusive, and lots 78 through 83, inclusive, of Tract Number 31097, in the City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 398 pages 94 through 103, inclusive, of maps, in the Office of the Riverside County Recorder. The lots that compose the flood control basin are also known as assessor’s property identification numbers 434-520-001-9 through 434-520-012-9, inclusive, and 434-522-001-5 through 434-522-006-0, inclusive. The addition of the flood control basin to the improvements maintained by Zone 38 will not result in an increase to the annual maximum assessment as increased by the annual inflator, approved by the property owners, and assessable on real property within the boundaries of Zone

38. The flood control basin is necessary to protect the Tract and Zone improvements from flooding until other flood control measures are in place.

In Fiscal Year 2017/18, the authorized improvements for Zone 7 (Tesoro) included the repair of curbs, gutters, and sidewalks located within the boundaries of the District. These improvements and services are anticipated to be included in future years. The inclusion of these improvements maintained by Zone 7 will not result in an increase of the annual maximum assessment allowed.

Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 4

4. SUMMARY OF ESTIMATE OF COSTS
The following table is a summary of the Fiscal Year 2026/27 estimate of costs.

Zone
2026/27
Levy
Amount
2026/27
Maximum
Rate
2026/27
Actual
Rate
% of
Maximum
(1)
Zone 1 (Sagecrest) $233,061.36 $929.66 $929.66 100%
Zone 1A (Sagecrest) 5,463.00 910.54 910.54 100%
Zone 2 (Meridian Estates) 37,105.94 547.77 410.83 75%
Zone 3 (San Jacinto Ranch) 90,950.28 1,550.77 1,318.15 85% Zone 4 (Timothy Lane) 31,038.56 838.92 838.92 100%
Zone 5 (Sunset Ranch) 49,628.80 954.43 763.55 80%
Zone 6 (Heritage Ranch) 62,317.20 944.22 944.22 100%
Zone 7 (Tesoro) 222,361.98 1,050.65 893.05 85%
Zone 8 (Meadowbrook/Solano) 250,498.84 825.94 743.34 90% Zone 9 (Goldencrest) 185,001.48 980.45 833.38 85%
Zone 10A (Maravilla) 38,476.24 522.83 418.27 80%
Zone 10B (Sendera) 35,548.70 522.83 418.27 80%
Zone 11 (Sandalwood) 140,401.80 1,310.97 1,114.33 85%
Zone 12 (Windmill Plaza) 2,971.60 183.16 119.06 65%
Zone 13 (Park Meadows) 170,217.60 1,251.65 1,001.32 80% Zone 14 (MSJC) 732.80 916.03 732.82 80%
Zone 15 (Willow Creek Apts.) 6,293.18 10,488.71 6,293.23 60% Zone 16 (La Perla) 10,102.30 818.05 531.73 65%
Zone 17 (Cloverdale) 11,644.80 776.37 388.19 50%
Zone 18 (500 S. State Street) 1,362.80 120.93 66.51 55% Zone 19-1 (Walmart) 50,229.36 1,371.27 685.64 50%
Zone 19-2 (Cali Coffee – Santana’s) 3,944.14 1,711.88 1,027.13 60% Zone 20 (Durango) 148,021.02 1,112.96 1,112.96 100%
Zone 21 (Arterra) 101,785.36 697.19 697.19 100%
Zone 22 (Park Hill) 136,420.04 1,272.60 1,018.08 80%
Zone 23 (Summerfield Ranch) 32,660.60 885.16 398.32 45% Zone 24 (El Toro Market) 1,971.94 300.28 165.16 55%
Zone 25 (Stallions Crossing) 83,007.70 848.35 805.93 95% Zone 26 (The Ranch) 265,075.20 1,057.18 898.60 85%
Zone 27 (Potter Ranch) 231,508.38 926.63 880.30 95%
Zone 28 (Mountain View Business Park)(2) 699.24 2,428.08 728.42 30% Zone 29 (Creekside) 156,181.74 1,092.21 1,092.21 100%
Zone 30 (Almaden) 86,475.84 1,310.29 982.72 75%
Zone 31 (Belicia) 72,959.66 1,196.09 1,196.09 100%
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 5
Zone
2026/27
Levy
Amount
2026/27
Maximum
Rate
2026/27
Actual
Rate
% of
Maximum
(1)
Zone 32 (Cottonwood Ranch) $143,858.96 $1,155.99 $1,098.19 95% Zone 33 (Daybreak) 77,270.60 789.71 750.22 95%
Zone 34 (Palmilla) 49,744.64 777.30 777.30 100%
Zone 35 (Terragon) 55,347.14 758.22 758.22 100%
Zone 36 (Cypress) 52,195.92 776.75 621.40 80%
Zone 37 (Cypress/Daybreak) 33,254.38 786.19 707.57 90%
Zone 38 (Coventry Acres) 177,709.28 906.72 906.72 100%
Zone 39 (The Trails) 66,961.28 766.19 727.88 95%
Zone 40 (Winners Circle) 6,441.50 991.09 495.55 50%
Zone 41 (Mosaico) 101,854.48 1,243.68 1,119.32 90%
Zone 42 (Santa Bella) 24,945.84 815.25 692.97 85%
Zone 43 (Remington/Lyndon Trails) 190,146.04 986.01 936.71 95% Zone 44 (Lyon/Shadow Canyon Trail) 0.00 806.82 0.00 0%
Zone 45 (Tamarisk ) 324,938.02 1,351.98 1,284.38 95%
Zone 46 (Parkside Village) 153,958.00 1,099.74 1,099.74 100% Zone 47 (Maravilla Estates) 0.00 414.22 0.00 0%
Zone 48 (San Jacinto Valley Academy) (2) 2,215.64 5,769.99 4,615.99 80% Zone 49 (Pheasant Run) 110,409.76 1,130.53 1,130.53 100% Zone 50 (The Trails) 0.00 1,369.78 0.00 0%
Zone 51 (SJ Retail) 41,553.86 1,488.92 1,042.25 70%
Zone 52 (Graciella Court) 2,295.18 1,275.20 255.04 20%
Zone 53 (The Cove) 181,152.72 1,677.37 1,677.37 100%
Zone 54 (Santa Fe Apartments) 3,390.68 5,651.19 3,390.71 60% Zone 55 (The Cove) 173,860.68 1,679.86 1,259.89 75%
Zone 56 (SW Corner of 7th & Lyon -
Annexation Not Completed) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0%
Zone 57 (7th Ave. East of Kirby) 2,912.32 910.25 182.05 20% Zone 58 (SE Corner of 7th & Lyon) 0.00 1,607.43 0.00 0% Zone 59 (Rite Aide) 49,326.96 2,216.36 1,773.09 80%
Zone 60 (Stater Bros) 0.00 2,128.69 0.00 0%
Zone 61 (Oostdam Dr. & Ivy Crest Dr.) 29,933.00 951.83 809.05 85% Zone 62 (Meadowbrook II) 91,374.42 1,603.09 1,603.09 100% Zone 63 (Palisades Ranch/Catalpa Park) 235,285.12 2,253.73 2,028.36 90% Zone 64 (The Enclave) 5,698.40 1,424.63 1,139.70 80%
Zone 65 (Cheyenne) 52,963.28 1,922.48 1,826.36 95%
Zone 66 (Palm/Cottonwood) 5,457.32 1,240.51 248.10 20%
Zone 67 (Park Avenue Estates) 39,942.70 1,521.67 1,141.25 75% Zone 68 (Shaver East of Los Banos) 6,805.60 1,237.43 680.59 55% Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 6
Zone
2026/27
Levy
Amount
2026/27
Maximum
Rate
2026/27
Actual
Rate
% of
Maximum
(1)
Zone 69 (Calvary Chapel) $0.00 $501.68 $0.00 0%
Zone 70 (Wateka/DeAnza) 0.00 1,678.06 0.00 0%
Zone 71 (Edelbrock) 0.00 3,289.65 0.00 0%
Zone 72 (Thayer Animal Hospital) 0.00 3,820.48 0.00 0%
Zone 73 (San Jacinto Villas) 10,285.34 1,437.51 718.76 50% Zone 74 (Ramona Crossings) 0.00 825.00 0.00 0%
Zone 75 (SJUSD Nutrition Center) 941.66 1,353.02 135.30 10% Zone 76 (Luz del Sol) 507,661.50 2,108.72 1,581.54 75%
Zone 77 (Kalpesh Homes) 6,061.50 1,347.44 134.74 10%
Zone 78 (Carolino Homes) 0.00 1,130.34 0.00 0%
Zone 79 (State Street Auto Body) 0.00 3,128.95 0.00 0%
Zone 80 (AutoZone) 0.00 3,616.76 0.00 0%
Zone 81 (Maravilla - Commercial -
Annexation Not Completed) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0%
Zone 82 (SJ West Congregation) 0.00 3,517.62 0.00 0%
Zone 83 (790 S. State Street) 0.00 5,116.03 0.00 0%
Zone 84 (Parkside Medical Center) 0.00 1,106.97 0.00 0% Zone 85 (Gupta Medical Center) 4,720.46 3,685.02 1,289.76 35% Zone 86 (CVS Pharmacy) 30,419.32 3,157.85 2,999.95 95%
Zone 87 (County Animal Shelter -
Annexation Not Completed) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0%
Zone 88 (Family Dollar) 11,795.26 2,792.45 2,233.96 80% Zone 89 (Kirby Village) 0.00 500.15 0.00 0%
Zone 90 (Circle K) 0.00 5,965.89 0.00 0%
Zone 91 (O’ Reilly Auto Parts) 1,766.70 4,298.62 429.86 10% Total $6,022,974.94
(1) Percentages are approximate.
(2) The actual rate is greater than the 2026/27 levy amount due to the total AU being less than one AU.

Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 7

5. ESTIMATE OF COSTS
The following pages provide an estimate of the costs of the improvements for Fiscal Year 2026/27 for each zone, to include the maximum amounts and actual amounts that will be levied. The City determines the percentage of the maximum amount to be levied in each zone based on the District’s budget. These costs can include a reserve fund to cover a six-month portion of maintenance and servicing costs as well as an amount of surplus or deficit in the improvement fund from a previous fiscal year.

City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone: 1
Common Name/Location:

Sagecrest Development
(State/Chase/Sagecrest)
Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied: 100%
Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit $93.13
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit $93.13
Maximum Total $23,519.76
Actual Total $23,519.76
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit $451.42
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit $451.42
Maximum Total $112,403.26
Actual Total $112,403.26
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit $32.88
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit $32.88
Maximum Total $8,187.35
Actual Total $8,187.35
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit $352.23
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit $352.23
Maximum Total $88,956.33
Actual Total $88,956.33
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit $0.00
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit $0.00
Maximum Total $0.00
Actual Total $0.00
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit $0.00
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit $0.00
Maximum Total $0.00
Actual Total $0.00
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit $0.00
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit $0.00
Maximum Total $0.00
Actual Total $0.00
Number of Units/Assessment Units 252.55
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit $929.66
Zone Maximum $233,066.70
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit $929.66
Adjustment Rounding 0.00
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit $929.66
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied) $233,061.36
*3.55 AU not assessed for Park and
Landscape Maintenance
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
1A
Sagecrest Development
(State/Chase/Sagecrest)
100%
$137.55
$137.55
$825.30
$825.30
$415.31
$415.31
$2,491.86
$2,491.86
$30.23
$30.23
$181.40
$181.40
$327.45
$327.45
$1,964.68
$1,964.68
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
6 $910.54
$5,463.24
$910.54

0.00 $910.54
$5,463.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
2 Meridian Estates
(Washington/Meridian)
75%
$113.58
$85.19
$10,279.30
$7,709.48
$190.51
$142.88
$17,145.72
$12,859.29
$42.71
$32.03
$3,865.22
$2,898.91
$150.74
$113.05
$13,641.52
$10,231.14
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$50.24
$37.68
$4,546.58
$3,409.94
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00

90.5 $547.77
$49,478.35
$410.83
(0.01)
$410.82
$37,105.94
*.50 AU not assessed for Park
Maintenance
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
3 San Jacinto Ranch
(Cottonwood/Kirby)
85%
$100.02
$85.02
$6,901.63
$5,866.38
$1,168.32
$993.07
$80,613.74
$68,521.68
$19.71
$16.75
$1,359.93
$1,155.94
$226.99
$192.94
$15,662.28
$13,312.94
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$35.73
$30.37
$2,465.55
$2,095.72
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
69 $1,550.77
$107,003.12
$1,318.15
(0.01)
$1,318.14
$90,950.28
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
4 Timothy Lane (Evans/Las
Rosas)
100%
$139.97
$139.97
$5,179.03
$5,179.03
$152.59
$152.59
$5,645.75
$5,645.75
$51.50
$51.50
$1,905.49
$1,905.49
$445.37
$445.37
$16,478.55
$16,478.55
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$49.49
$49.49
$1,831.11
$1,831.11
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
37 $838.92
$31,039.94
$838.92

0.00 $838.92
$31,038.56
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
5 Sunset Ranch (Ramona
Blvd/Savory Lane)
80%
$62.83
$50.27
$4,084.12
$3,267.29
$346.05
$276.84
$22,493.39
$17,994.71
$9.52
$7.62
$618.77
$495.01
$493.38
$394.70
$32,069.54
$25,655.63
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$42.65
$34.12
$2,772.28
$2,217.82
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
65 $954.43
$62,038.09
$763.55
(0.01)
$763.54
$49,628.80
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
6 Heritage Ranch
(Cottonwood/Palm)
100%
$101.32
$101.32
$6,687.41
$6,687.41
$144.19
$144.19
$9,516.65
$9,516.65
$203.71
$203.71
$13,445.06
$13,445.06
$453.05
$453.05
$29,901.48
$29,901.48
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$41.94
$41.94
$2,768.10
$2,768.10
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
66 $944.22
$62,318.71
$944.22

0.00 $944.22
$62,317.20
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
7 Tesoro (Cottonwood/Kirby)
85%
$84.77
$72.05
$21,107.42
$17,941.31
$504.83
$429.10
$125,702.29
$106,846.95
$49.49
$42.07
$12,322.89
$10,474.45
$363.81
$309.24
$90,588.69
$77,000.38
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$47.76
$40.59
$11,891.02
$10,107.37
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
249
$1,050.65
$261,612.31
$893.05
(0.01)
$893.04
$222,361.98
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
8 Meadowbrook/Solano
(Kirby/7th Street)
90%
$120.93
$108.84
$40,754.87
$36,679.38
$286.93
$258.24
$96,695.94
$87,026.35
$112.00
$100.80
$37,744.53
$33,970.08
$255.06
$229.55
$85,954.79
$77,359.31
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$51.01
$45.91
$17,190.96
$15,471.86
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
337
$825.94
$278,341.09
$743.34

0.00 $743.34
$250,498.84
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
9 Goldencrest (San Jacinto
St./Ramona Expr.)
85%
$90.58
$77.00
$20,109.42
$17,093.00
$170.40
$144.84
$37,829.85
$32,155.37
$139.38
$118.48
$30,942.95
$26,301.50
$530.10
$450.58
$117,681.21
$100,029.03
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$49.98
$42.48
$11,096.06
$9,431.65
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
222
$980.45
$217,659.48
$833.38

0.00 $833.38
$185,001.48
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
10A
Maravilla
80%
$55.46
$44.37
$5,102.24
$4,081.79
$337.15
$269.72
$31,017.35
$24,813.88
$15.70
$12.56
$1,444.29
$1,155.44
$82.64
$66.11
$7,602.65
$6,082.12
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$31.89
$25.51
$2,934.05
$2,347.24
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
92 $522.83
$48,100.58
$418.27
(0.01)
$418.26
$38,476.24
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
10B
Sendera
80%
$57.99
$46.39
$4,928.89
$3,943.11
$317.91
$254.33
$27,022.45
$21,617.96
$35.05
$28.04
$2,978.98
$2,383.18
$82.05
$65.64
$6,974.11
$5,579.29
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$29.84
$23.87
$2,536.33
$2,029.07
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
85 $522.83
$44,440.75
$418.27
(0.01)
$418.26
$35,548.70
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
11 Sandalwood (Cottonwood
Ave.)
85%
$86.77
$73.75
$10,933.00
$9,293.05
$800.61
$680.52
$100,877.21
$85,745.63
$22.67
$19.27
$2,857.04
$2,428.48
$324.44
$275.77
$40,879.35
$34,747.45
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$76.48
$65.00
$9,635.94
$8,190.55
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
126
$1,310.97
$165,182.54
$1,114.33
(0.01)
$1,114.32
$140,401.80
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
12 Windmill Plaza
(Esplanade/Santa Fe)
65%
$125.56
$81.61
$3,133.86
$2,037.01
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$57.61
$37.45
$1,437.91
$934.64
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00

24.96 $183.16
$4,571.77
$119.06

0.00 $119.06
$2,971.60
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
13 Park Meadows (7th
Street/Lyon)
80%
$119.83
$95.87
$20,371.44
$16,297.15
$649.03
$519.23
$110,335.33
$88,268.26
$331.50
$265.20
$56,355.06
$45,084.05
$107.36
$85.89
$18,251.90
$14,601.52
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$43.92
$35.14
$7,466.83
$5,973.47
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
170
$1,251.65
$212,780.56
$1,001.32

0.00 $1,001.32
$170,217.60
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
14 MSJC (Eagle Dr/Country
Village Dr)
80%
$916.03
$732.82
$916.03
$732.82
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 $916.03
$916.03
$732.82

0.00 $732.82
$732.80
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Santa Fe/Esplanade)
60%
$1,987.06
$1,192.24
$1,987.06
$1,192.24
$4,557.51
$2,734.51
$4,557.51
$2,734.51
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$2,629.42
$1,577.65
$2,629.42
$1,577.65
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,314.71
$788.83
$1,314.71
$788.83
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 $10,488.71
$10,488.71
$6,293.23
(0.01)
$6,293.22
$6,293.18
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
16 La Perla (7th Street/Santa
Fe)
65%
$106.47
$69.21
$2,022.95
$1,314.92
$213.84
$138.99
$4,062.87
$2,640.86
$25.09
$16.31
$476.67
$309.83
$270.09
$175.56
$5,131.76
$3,335.64
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$202.56
$131.67
$3,848.73
$2,501.67
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
19 $818.05
$15,542.96
$531.73
(0.01)
$531.72
$10,102.30
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
17 Cloverdale (Evans/Katrina
Lane)
50%
$76.52
$38.26
$2,295.53
$1,147.76
$173.47
$86.73
$5,204.00
$2,602.00
$40.67
$20.34
$1,220.18
$610.09
$416.32
$208.16
$12,489.71
$6,244.85
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$69.39
$34.70
$2,081.71
$1,040.86
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
30 $776.37
$23,291.12
$388.19
(0.01)
$388.18
$11,644.80
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
18 500 S. State Street
55%
$61.58
$33.87
$1,261.70
$693.94
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$59.36
$32.65
$1,216.20
$668.91
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00

20.49 $120.93
$2,477.91
$66.51
(0.01)
$66.50
$1,362.80
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
19-1
Walmart
(State/Idyllwild,San
Jacinto/Commonwealth)
50%
$244.41
$122.20
$17,905.21
$8,952.60
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$128.53
$64.27
$9,416.34
$4,708.17
$888.22
$444.11
$65,070.86
$32,535.43
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$110.12
$55.06
$8,067.20
$4,033.60
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00

73.26 $1,371.27
$100,459.60
$685.64

0.00 $685.64
$50,229.36
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
19-2
Cali Coffee – Santana’s
(State/Idyllwild,San
Jacinto/Commonwealth)
60%
$874.55
$524.73
$3,358.26
$2,014.96
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$837.34
$502.40
$3,215.37
$1,929.22
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00

3.84 $1,711.88
$6,573.64
$1,027.13
(0.01)
$1,027.12
$3,944.14
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
20 Durango (Main/Ramona
Exp.)
100%
$140.45
$140.45
$18,680.30
$18,680.30
$452.81
$452.81
$60,224.37
$60,224.37
$84.48
$84.48
$11,235.98
$11,235.98
$387.36
$387.36
$51,518.69
$51,518.69
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$47.86
$47.86
$6,364.95
$6,364.95
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
133
$1,112.96
$148,024.29
$1,112.96

0.00 $1,112.96
$148,021.02
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
21 Arterra (Palm/7th Street)
100%
$137.58
$137.58
$20,087.19
$20,087.19
$319.72
$319.72
$46,678.64
$46,678.64
$83.40
$83.40
$12,176.07
$12,176.07
$88.45
$88.45
$12,914.18
$12,914.18
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$68.04
$68.04
$9,933.99
$9,933.99
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
146
$697.19
$101,790.06
$697.19
(0.01)
$697.18
$101,785.36
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
22 Park Hill (Park/Hewitt)
80%
$115.56
$92.44
$15,484.46
$12,387.57
$234.78
$187.82
$31,460.45
$25,168.36
$475.31
$380.24
$63,691.01
$50,952.81
$403.30
$322.64
$54,042.80
$43,234.24
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$43.66
$34.93
$5,849.97
$4,679.97
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
134
$1,272.60
$170,528.69
$1,018.08

0.00 $1,018.08
$136,420.04
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
23 Summerfield Ranch (7th
Street/Palm)
45%
$146.19
$65.79
$11,987.84
$5,394.53
$111.60
$50.22
$9,151.40
$4,118.13
$80.98
$36.44
$6,640.69
$2,988.31
$486.04
$218.72
$39,855.04
$17,934.77
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$60.34
$27.15
$4,948.18
$2,226.68
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
82 $885.16
$72,583.14
$398.32

0.00 $398.32
$32,660.60
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
24 El Toro Market (670 S. State
Street)
55%
$174.81
$96.14
$2,087.21
$1,147.96
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$125.48
$69.01
$1,498.19
$824.01
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00

11.94 $300.28
$3,585.40
$165.16

0.00 $165.16
$1,971.94
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
25 Stallions Crossing
(Cottonwood/Lyon)
95%
$191.96
$182.36
$19,771.80
$18,783.21
$277.62
$263.74
$28,594.73
$27,164.99
$140.34
$133.32
$14,454.95
$13,732.20
$164.44
$156.22
$16,937.19
$16,090.33
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$73.99
$70.29
$7,620.95
$7,239.91
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
103
$848.35
$87,379.63
$805.93
(0.01)
$805.92
$83,007.70
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
26 The Ranch
(Cottonwood/Cawston/7th
Street)
85%
$120.65
$102.55
$35,591.53
$30,252.80
$491.19
$417.51
$144,900.35
$123,165.30
$69.56
$59.13
$20,520.63
$17,442.54
$330.46
$280.89
$97,484.23
$82,861.59
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$45.33
$38.53
$13,372.05
$11,366.24
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
295
$1,057.18
$311,868.79
$898.60

0.00 $898.60
$265,075.20
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
27 Potter Ranch (Ramona
Blvd/Potter Rd.)
95%
$138.34
$131.42
$36,382.84
$34,563.70
$423.37
$402.20
$111,346.52
$105,779.20
$41.79
$39.70
$10,990.05
$10,440.54
$275.34
$261.57
$72,413.80
$68,793.11
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$47.80
$45.41
$12,571.07
$11,942.52
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
263
$926.63
$243,704.28
$880.30

0.00 $880.30
$231,508.38
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
28 Mountain View Business
Park (Main Street/Dillon
Ave.)
30%
$656.24
$196.87
$629.99
$189.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,771.84
$531.55
$1,700.97
$510.29
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00

0.96 $2,428.08
$2,330.96
$728.42

0.00 $728.42
$699.24
*The amount levied is less than the
actual rate due to the assignment
of .96 AU, which is not a whole AU.

City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
29 Creekside
(Cottonwood/Palm Ave.)
100%
$152.73
$152.73
$21,839.68
$21,839.68
$371.81
$371.81
$53,169.53
$53,169.53
$97.72
$97.72
$13,974.46
$13,974.46
$424.76
$424.76
$60,741.21
$60,741.21
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$45.18
$45.18
$6,460.44
$6,460.44
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
143
$1,092.21
$156,185.32
$1,092.21
(0.01)
$1,092.20
$156,181.74
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
30 Almaden (Lyon/DeAnza
Ave.)
75%
$115.59
$86.69
$10,172.19
$7,629.14
$419.72
$314.79
$36,935.68
$27,701.76
$128.90
$96.67
$11,343.11
$8,507.33
$581.94
$436.46
$51,210.93
$38,408.20
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$64.13
$48.10
$5,643.33
$4,232.50
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
88 $1,310.29
$115,305.24
$982.72

0.00 $982.72
$86,475.84
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
31 Belicia
(Washington/Mountain
Ave.)
100%
$112.18
$112.18
$6,843.23
$6,843.23
$247.77
$247.77
$15,114.14
$15,114.14
$8.43
$8.43
$514.28
$514.28
$754.06
$754.06
$45,997.55
$45,997.55
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$73.64
$73.64
$4,492.09
$4,492.09
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
61 $1,196.09
$72,961.29
$1,196.09
(0.01)
$1,196.08
$72,959.66
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
32 Cottonwood Ranch
(Cottonwood/Kirby Ave.)
95%
$131.10
$124.54
$17,173.88
$16,315.19
$476.32
$452.50
$62,397.87
$59,277.98
$49.56
$47.08
$6,492.13
$6,167.52
$454.40
$431.68
$59,526.36
$56,550.04
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$44.61
$42.38
$5,843.87
$5,551.68
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
131
$1,155.99
$151,434.11
$1,098.19
(0.01)
$1,098.18
$143,858.96
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
33 Daybreak
(Esplanade/Meridian Ave.)
95%
$123.46
$117.28
$12,715.93
$12,080.14
$536.27
$509.46
$55,235.78
$52,473.99
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$46.90
$44.56
$4,830.77
$4,589.23
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$83.08
$78.93
$8,557.20
$8,129.34
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
103
$789.71
$81,339.69
$750.22

0.00 $750.22
$77,270.60
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
34 Palmilla
(Washington/Arroyo Viejo)
100%
$104.03
$104.03
$6,657.81
$6,657.81
$540.30
$540.30
$34,579.31
$34,579.31
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$47.25
$47.25
$3,023.93
$3,023.93
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$85.72
$85.72
$5,486.01
$5,486.01
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
64 $777.30
$49,747.06
$777.30

0.00 $777.30
$49,744.64
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
35 Terragon
(Washington/Berringer)
100%
$75.03
$75.03
$5,477.47
$5,477.47
$548.11
$548.11
$40,011.99
$40,011.99
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$47.95
$47.95
$3,500.01
$3,500.01
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$87.13
$87.13
$6,360.50
$6,360.50
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
73 $758.22
$55,349.96
$758.22

0.00 $758.22
$55,347.14
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
36 Cypress
(Washington/Arroyo Viejo)
80%
$104.43
$83.55
$8,772.24
$7,017.79
$539.06
$431.24
$45,280.66
$36,224.53
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$47.16
$37.73
$3,961.21
$3,168.97
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$86.10
$68.88
$7,232.71
$5,786.17
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
84 $776.75
$65,246.83
$621.40

0.00 $621.40
$52,195.92
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
37 Cypress/Daybreak
(Washington/Villines)
90%
$109.05
$98.15
$5,125.35
$4,612.82
$538.62
$484.75
$25,314.94
$22,783.44
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$47.10
$42.39
$2,213.81
$1,992.43
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$91.42
$82.28
$4,296.68
$3,867.01
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
47 $786.19
$36,950.78
$707.57
(0.01)
$707.56
$33,254.38
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
38 Coventry Acres (Palm
Ave/De Anza Dr)
100%
$88.77
$88.77
$17,398.83
$17,398.83
$518.48
$518.48
$101,622.14
$101,622.14
$22.24
$22.24
$4,359.08
$4,359.08
$232.31
$232.31
$45,533.48
$45,533.48
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$44.92
$44.92
$8,803.37
$8,803.37
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
196
$906.72
$177,716.90
$906.72

0.00 $906.72
$177,709.28
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
39 The Trails
(Washington/Meridian)
95%
$107.69
$102.31
$9,907.83
$9,412.44
$527.20
$500.84
$48,502.17
$46,077.06
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$46.11
$43.81
$4,242.36
$4,030.24
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$85.19
$80.93
$7,837.24
$7,445.37
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
92 $766.19
$70,489.59
$727.88

0.00 $727.88
$66,961.28
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
40 Winners Circle (7th
Street/Kirby)
50%
$269.22
$134.61
$3,499.81
$1,749.91
$188.13
$94.07
$2,445.75
$1,222.87
$27.22
$13.61
$353.82
$176.91
$289.45
$144.73
$3,762.85
$1,881.43
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$217.07
$108.54
$2,821.96
$1,410.98
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
13 $991.09
$12,884.18
$495.55
(0.01)
$495.54
$6,441.50
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
41 Mosaico (Lyon Ave)
90%
$98.51
$88.66
$8,964.56
$8,068.10
$474.16
$426.74
$43,148.29
$38,833.46
$54.23
$48.81
$4,935.09
$4,441.58
$209.25
$188.32
$19,041.55
$17,137.40
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$407.54
$366.78
$37,085.74
$33,377.17
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
91 $1,243.68
$113,175.23
$1,119.32

0.00 $1,119.32
$101,854.48
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
42 Santa Bella
(Commonwealth Ave.)
85%
$143.45
$121.93
$5,164.24
$4,389.61
$529.49
$450.07
$19,061.58
$16,202.35
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$46.31
$39.37
$1,667.31
$1,417.21
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$96.00
$81.60
$3,456.03
$2,937.62
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
36 $815.25
$29,349.16
$692.97
(0.01)
$692.96
$24,945.84
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
43 Remington/Lyndon Trails
(Esplanade Ave.)
95%
$99.48
$94.51
$20,195.04
$19,185.29
$500.42
$475.40
$101,585.39
$96,506.12
$169.66
$161.18
$34,440.96
$32,718.91
$169.77
$161.28
$34,463.28
$32,740.12
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$46.68
$44.35
$9,476.19
$9,002.38
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
203
$986.01
$200,160.87
$936.71
(0.01)
$936.70
$190,146.04
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
44 Lyon/Shadow Canyon Trail
(Lyon Ave.)
0%
$134.87
$0.00
$13,487.38
$0.00
$189.66
$0.00
$18,965.55
$0.00
$282.21
$0.00
$28,221.06
$0.00
$146.99
$0.00
$14,698.85
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$53.10
$0.00
$5,309.55
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
100
$806.82
$80,682.38
$0.00

0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
45 Tamarisk (Cottonwood
Ave.)
95%
$94.35
$89.63
$23,870.86
$22,677.31
$817.23
$776.37
$206,760.19
$196,422.18
$61.01
$57.96
$15,436.30
$14,664.49
$333.62
$316.94
$84,405.83
$80,185.53
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$45.76
$43.48
$11,578.39
$10,999.47
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
253
$1,351.98
$342,051.56
$1,284.38

0.00 $1,284.38
$324,938.02
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
46 Parkside Village (Sanderson
Ave.)
100%
$95.41
$95.41
$13,357.99
$13,357.99
$253.00
$253.00
$35,419.46
$35,419.46
$191.05
$191.05
$26,746.77
$26,746.77
$513.27
$513.27
$71,857.57
$71,857.57
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$47.01
$47.01
$6,581.49
$6,581.49
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
140
$1,099.74
$153,963.29
$1,099.74

0.00 $1,099.74
$153,958.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
47 Maravilla Estates (Ramona
Expressway)
0%
$65.47
$0.00
$14,599.51
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$261.23
$0.00
$58,254.55
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$87.52
$0.00
$19,516.42
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
223
$414.22
$92,370.47
$0.00

0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
48 San Jacinto Valley Academy
(San Jacinto Ave.)
80%
$1,398.20
$1,118.56
$671.14
$536.91
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$2,573.72
$2,058.97
$1,235.38
$988.31
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,798.07
$1,438.46
$863.07
$690.46
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00

0.48 $5,769.99
$2,769.59
$4,615.99
(0.01)
$4,615.98
$2,215.64
*The amount levied is less than the
actual rate due to the assignment
of .48 AU, which is not a whole AU.

City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
49 Pheasant Run (Main
Street/Camino Los Banos)
100%
$109.06
$109.06
$10,847.33
$10,847.33
$239.93
$239.93
$21,833.63
$21,833.63
$135.74
$135.74
$13,500.36
$13,500.36
$573.10
$573.10
$57,000.36
$57,000.36
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$72.70
$72.70
$7,230.98
$7,230.98
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00

99.46 $1,130.53
$110,412.65
$1,130.53
(0.01)
$1,130.52
$110,409.76
*1 AU not assessed for Park
Maintenance.

City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
50 The Trails (Blodgett St.)
0%
$106.66
$0.00
$62,149.09
$0.00
$774.03
$0.00
$451,001.35
$0.00
$212.89
$0.00
$124,044.88
$0.00
$231.81
$0.00
$135,068.38
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$44.39
$0.00
$25,866.75
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
582.67
$1,369.78
$798,130.44
$0.00

0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
51 SJ Retail
(Esplanade/Sanderson)
70%
$323.46
$226.42
$12,896.45
$9,027.52
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$398.66
$279.06
$15,894.55
$11,126.19
$346.29
$242.41
$13,806.77
$9,664.74
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$420.51
$294.35
$16,765.55
$11,735.89
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00

39.87 $1,488.92
$59,363.33
$1,042.25
(0.01)
$1,042.24
$41,553.86
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
52 Graciella Court (6th Street)
20%
$379.68
$75.94
$3,417.15
$683.43
$263.46
$52.69
$2,371.11
$474.22
$46.62
$9.32
$419.57
$83.91
$292.72
$58.54
$2,634.50
$526.90
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$292.72
$58.54
$2,634.50
$526.90
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
9 $1,275.20
$11,476.83
$255.04

0.00 $255.04
$2,295.18
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
53 The Cove (Cottonwood Ave.)
100%
$122.57
$122.57
$13,237.91
$13,237.91
$514.57
$514.57
$55,573.33
$55,573.33
$597.29
$597.29
$64,506.90
$64,506.90
$405.11
$405.11
$43,751.41
$43,751.41
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$37.84
$37.84
$4,086.49
$4,086.49
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
108
$1,677.37
$181,156.05
$1,677.37
(0.01)
$1,677.36
$181,152.72
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
54 Santa Fe Apartments (Santa
Fe Ave.)
60%
$1,004.91
$602.95
$1,004.91
$602.95
$1,659.41
$995.64
$1,659.41
$995.64
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,866.79
$1,120.07
$1,866.79
$1,120.07
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,120.08
$672.05
$1,120.08
$672.05
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
1 $5,651.19
$5,651.19
$3,390.71
(0.01)
$3,390.70
$3,390.68
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
55 The Cove (Cottonwood Ave.)
75%
$126.56
$94.92
$17,464.63
$13,098.47
$514.19
$385.64
$70,957.57
$53,218.18
$596.83
$447.63
$82,363.09
$61,772.32
$404.79
$303.59
$55,861.39
$41,896.04
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$37.49
$28.12
$5,173.64
$3,880.23
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
138
$1,679.86
$231,820.32
$1,259.89
(0.01)
$1,259.88
$173,860.68
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
56 SW Corner of 7th & Lyon
(Annexation Not
Completed)
0%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
N/A
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00

0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
57 7th Ave. East of Kirby
(Sanderson Ave.)
20%
$285.14
$57.03
$4,562.25
$912.45
$298.95
$59.79
$4,783.16
$956.63
$45.91
$9.18
$734.50
$146.90
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$280.25
$56.05
$4,484.07
$896.81
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
16 $910.25
$14,563.98
$182.05
(0.01)
$182.04
$2,912.32
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
58 SE Corner of 7th & Lyon
(Kirby St.)
0%
$139.77
$0.00
$7,268.08
$0.00
$232.77
$0.00
$12,103.82
$0.00
$205.78
$0.00
$10,700.48
$0.00
$989.02
$0.00
$51,429.03
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$40.10
$0.00
$2,085.12
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
52 $1,607.43
$83,586.53
$0.00

0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
59 Rite Aide (State St./Ramona
Expwy)
80%
$332.00
$265.60
$9,236.31
$7,389.05
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$963.24
$770.59
$26,797.38
$21,437.91
$518.13
$414.50
$14,414.28
$11,531.42
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$402.99
$322.39
$11,211.20
$8,968.96
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00

27.82 $2,216.36
$61,659.18
$1,773.09
(0.01)
$1,773.08
$49,326.96
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
60 Stater Bros (State
St./Ramona Expwy)
0%
$243.72
$0.00
$9,746.34
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$790.53
$0.00
$31,613.30
$0.00
$684.03
$0.00
$27,354.21
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$410.42
$0.00
$16,412.53
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00

39.99 $2,128.69
$85,126.37
$0.00

0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
61 Oostdam Dr. & Ivy Crest Dr.
(Sanderson Ave./Kirby St.)
85%
$179.36
$152.46
$6,636.50
$5,641.03
$163.65
$139.10
$6,054.88
$5,146.65
$55.94
$47.55
$2,069.77
$1,759.30
$464.42
$394.76
$17,183.49
$14,605.97
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$88.46
$75.19
$3,272.89
$2,781.96
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
37 $951.83
$35,217.54
$809.05
(0.01)
$809.04
$29,933.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
62 Meadowbrook II (Esplanade
Ave./Kirby St.)
100%
$150.81
$150.81
$8,596.32
$8,596.32
$139.53
$139.53
$7,953.06
$7,953.06
$333.50
$333.50
$19,009.43
$19,009.43
$905.81
$905.81
$51,631.44
$51,631.44
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$73.43
$73.43
$4,185.66
$4,185.66
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
57 $1,603.09
$91,375.91
$1,603.09
(0.01)
$1,603.08
$91,374.42
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
63 Palisades Ranch (Catalpa
Park) (Seventh St./Crawson
Ave.)
90%
$106.15
$95.54
$12,313.66
$11,082.29
$98.82
$88.94
$11,463.43
$10,317.09
$1,429.79
$1,286.81
$165,855.23
$149,269.71
$546.14
$491.53
$63,352.80
$57,017.52
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$72.82
$65.54
$8,447.56
$7,602.81
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
116
$2,253.73
$261,432.69
$2,028.36

0.00 $2,028.36
$235,285.12
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
64 The Enclave (Sanderson
Ave./Lyon Ave.)
80%
$600.57
$480.46
$3,002.86
$2,402.29
$244.02
$195.21
$1,220.08
$976.07
$189.61
$151.69
$948.03
$758.43
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$390.43
$312.34
$1,952.15
$1,561.72
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
5 $1,424.63
$7,123.13
$1,139.70

0.00 $1,139.70
$5,698.40
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
65 Cheyenne (Sanderson
Ave./Kirby St.)
95%
$172.90
$164.25
$5,013.99
$4,763.29
$216.68
$205.85
$6,283.75
$5,969.57
$478.82
$454.88
$13,885.68
$13,191.40
$936.98
$890.13
$27,172.28
$25,813.67
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$117.11
$111.26
$3,396.28
$3,226.47
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
29 $1,922.48
$55,752.00
$1,826.36

0.00 $1,826.36
$52,963.28
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
66 Palm/Cottonwood (Palm
Ave./De Anza Dr.)
20%
$221.10
$44.22
$4,864.15
$972.83
$238.59
$47.72
$5,249.00
$1,049.80
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$650.69
$130.14
$14,315.11
$2,863.02
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$130.14
$26.03
$2,863.02
$572.60
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
22 $1,240.51
$27,291.29
$248.10

0.00 $248.10
$5,457.32
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
67 Park Avenue Estates (Hewitt
St.)
75%
$193.21
$144.91
$6,762.49
$5,071.87
$180.83
$135.62
$6,329.03
$4,746.77
$362.30
$271.72
$12,680.48
$9,510.36
$661.33
$496.00
$23,146.50
$17,359.87
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$124.00
$93.00
$4,339.86
$3,254.89
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
35 $1,521.67
$53,258.35
$1,141.25
(0.01)
$1,141.24
$39,942.70
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
68 Shaver East of Los Banos
(Hewitt St.)
55%
$352.71
$193.99
$3,527.12
$1,939.92
$307.15
$168.93
$3,071.51
$1,689.33
$116.83
$64.26
$1,168.35
$642.59
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$460.73
$253.40
$4,607.34
$2,534.04
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
10 $1,237.43
$12,374.32
$680.59
(0.01)
$680.58
$6,805.60
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
69 Calvary Chapel (Lyon Ave.)
0%
$136.28
$0.00
$5,895.38
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$178.97
$0.00
$7,742.29
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$186.43
$0.00
$8,064.86
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00

43.26 $501.68
$21,702.52
$0.00

0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
70 Wateka/DeAnza (Ramona
Blvd.)
0%
$195.19
$0.00
$2,147.04
$0.00
$204.07
$0.00
$2,244.72
$0.00
$110.08
$0.00
$1,210.86
$0.00
$890.47
$0.00
$9,795.12
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$278.27
$0.00
$3,060.98
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
11 $1,678.06
$18,458.71
$0.00

0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
71 Edelbrock (Esplanade
Ave./Buena Vista St.)
0%
$423.06
$0.00
$3,020.67
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$414.52
$0.00
$2,959.66
$0.00
$1,671.86
$0.00
$11,937.11
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$780.20
$0.00
$5,570.65
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00

7.14 $3,289.65
$23,488.09
$0.00

0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
72 Thayer Animal Hospital
(State St./Seventh St.)
0%
$333.82
$0.00
$1,442.10
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$2,360.02
$0.00
$10,195.27
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,126.64
$0.00
$4,867.10
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00

4.32 $3,820.48
$16,504.47
$0.00

0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
73 San Jacinto Villas (Santa Fe
Ave.)
50%
$116.96
$58.48
$1,673.75
$836.88
$826.47
$413.24
$11,826.85
$5,913.43
$65.53
$32.77
$937.79
$468.89
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$428.54
$214.27
$6,132.43
$3,066.21
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00

14.31 $1,437.51
$20,570.82
$718.76

0.00 $718.76
$10,285.34
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
74 Ramona Crossings (State
St./Ramona Blvd.)
0%
$147.61
$0.00
$2,032.53
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$141.93
$0.00
$1,954.31
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$535.47
$0.00
$7,373.40
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00

13.77 $825.00
$11,360.24
$0.00

0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
75 SJUSD Nutrition Center
(Cottonwood Ave./State St.)
10%
$487.24
$48.72
$3,391.16
$339.12
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$865.78
$86.58
$6,025.82
$602.58
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00

6.96 $1,353.02
$9,416.98
$135.30

0.00 $135.30
$941.66
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
76 Luz del Sol (Ramona
Exwy./Ramona Blvd./Bridge
Rd.)
75%
$76.36
$57.27
$24,512.27
$18,384.20
$927.20
$695.40
$297,630.47
$223,222.85
$480.16
$360.12
$154,131.99
$115,599.00
$557.08
$417.81
$178,822.75
$134,117.06
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$67.92
$50.94
$21,802.51
$16,351.88
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
321
$2,108.72
$676,899.99
$1,581.54

0.00 $1,581.54
$507,661.50
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
77 Kalpesh Homes (Ramona
Blvd./Savi St. - Lyon Ave./De
Anza Dr.)
10%
$154.19
$15.42
$6,938.57
$693.86
$170.40
$17.04
$7,667.98
$766.80
$273.11
$27.31
$12,290.15
$1,229.02
$605.84
$60.58
$27,262.93
$2,726.29
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$143.90
$14.39
$6,475.29
$647.53
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
45 $1,347.44
$60,634.92
$134.74

0.00 $134.74
$6,061.50
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
78 Carolino Homes – (Shaver
and Anda Loop)
0%
$299.42
$0.00
$4,191.83
$0.00
$302.58
$0.00
$4,236.18
$0.00
$139.30
$0.00
$1,950.13
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$389.04
$0.00
$5,446.55
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
14 $1,130.34
$15,824.70
$0.00

0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
79 State Street Auto Body
(Lyon Ave./De Anza Dr.)
0%
$721.37
$0.00
$2,055.91
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$2,407.58
$0.00
$6,861.60
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00

2.85 $3,128.95
$8,917.51
$0.00

0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
80 AutoZone (San Jacinto Ave.)
0%
$545.12
$0.00
$1,619.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$224.00
$0.00
$665.29
$0.00
$949.21
$0.00
$2,819.16
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,898.43
$0.00
$5,638.33
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00

2.97 $3,616.76
$10,741.78
$0.00

0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
81 Maravilla - Commercial
(Annexation Not
Completed)
0%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
N/A
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00

0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
82 SJ West Congregation
0%
$825.39
$0.00
$2,921.88
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$715.00
$0.00
$2,531.08
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,977.23
$0.00
$6,999.40
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00

3.54 $3,517.62
$12,452.36
$0.00

0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
83 790 S. State Street
0%
$535.99
$0.00
$1,318.53
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$224.59
$0.00
$552.49
$0.00
$2,488.83
$0.00
$6,122.53
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,866.62
$0.00
$4,591.89
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00

2.46 $5,116.03
$12,585.44
$0.00

0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
84 Parkside Medical Center
0%
$105.93
$0.00
$5,122.54
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$381.56
$0.00
$18,452.43
$0.00
$515.41
$0.00
$24,925.22
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$104.07
$0.00
$5,032.98
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00

48.36 $1,106.97
$53,533.17
$0.00

0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
85 Gupta Medical Center
35%
$533.35
$186.67
$1,952.07
$683.22
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$361.43
$126.50
$1,322.84
$463.00
$1,594.42
$558.05
$5,835.57
$2,042.45
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,195.81
$418.53
$4,376.68
$1,531.84
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00

3.66 $3,685.02
$13,487.16
$1,289.76

0.00 $1,289.76
$4,720.46
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
86 CVS Pharmacy (Sanderson
Ave.)
95%
$584.49
$555.27
$5,926.75
$5,630.42
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,555.16
$1,477.40
$15,769.33
$14,980.86
$610.92
$580.37
$6,194.69
$5,884.95
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$407.28
$386.91
$4,129.79
$3,923.30
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00

10.14 $3,157.85
$32,020.56
$2,999.95
(0.01)
$2,999.94
$30,419.32
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
87 County Animal Shelter
(Annexation Not
Completed)
0%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
N/A
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00

0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
88 Family Dollar (San Jacinto
Ave.)
80%
$307.71
$246.17
$1,624.73
$1,299.78
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$513.28
$410.62
$2,710.10
$2,168.08
$597.95
$478.36
$3,157.20
$2,525.76
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,101.49
$881.20
$5,815.89
$4,652.71
$272.01
$217.61
$1,436.21
$1,148.97

5.28 $2,792.45
$14,744.14
$2,233.96

0.00 $2,233.96
$11,795.26
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
89 Kirby Village (Portal Dr. and
S. Kirby St)
0%
$133.00
$0.00
$4,787.82
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$98.69
$0.00
$3,552.72
$0.00
$76.20
$0.00
$2,743.11
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$140.37
$0.00
$5,053.22
$0.00
$51.90
$0.00
$1,868.40
$0.00
36 $500.15
$18,005.28
$0.00

0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
90 Circle K (Sanderson Ave.)
0%
$331.32
$0.00
$1,659.93
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$2,971.48
$0.00
$14,887.09
$0.00
$1,135.84
$0.00
$5,690.54
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,009.63
$0.00
$5,058.26
$0.00
$517.62
$0.00
$2,593.28
$0.00

5.01 $5,965.89
$29,889.10
$0.00

0.00 $0.00
$0.00
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Estimate of Costs
Zone:

Common Name/Location:

Percentage of Maximum Rate to be Levied:

Description
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Park Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Landscape Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Storm Drain Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Detention Basin
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Graffiti Removal Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Sidewalk Maintenance Levy
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Maximum Total
Actual Total
Number of Units/Assessment Units
TOTALS
Maximum Rate Per Assessment Unit
Zone Maximum
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Adjustment Rounding
Actual Rate Per Assessment Unit
Balance to Levy (Actual Amount Levied)
91 O’ Reilly Auto Parts (San
Jacinto Ave.)
10%
$461.71
$46.17
$1,897.64
$189.76
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$2,585.97
$258.60
$10,628.34
$1,062.83
$199.77
$19.98
$821.07
$82.11
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$783.43
$78.34
$3,219.89
$321.99
$267.73
$26.77
$1,100.37
$110.04

4.11 $4,298.62
$17,667.32
$429.86

0.00 $429.86
$1,766.70
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 8

6. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT

6.1 Method of Apportionment
The net amount to be assessed upon parcels within the District is apportioned by a formula and method designed to fairly distribute such amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated special benefit to be received by each lot or parcel from the improvements within the District.

The maintenance and servicing of public landscaping, lighting, park facilities and street trees installed and constructed in public places in the City provides a special benefit which is received by each and every lot or parcel within the specified zones of benefit in the District. Landscaping and street trees within the District enhance the aesthetic appeal of parcels within the landscaping and street tree zones. Such landscaping improves erosion resistance and dust control. Street lights improve ingress and egress of such lots or parcels by illuminating access after sunset. Such street lights, by so improving ingress and egress, improve the security of such lots or parcels by improving the nighttime visibility of such lots or parcels and improve the access of emergency vehicles thereto, and in the case of commercial lots or parcels, facilitate the opening and operation of business uses after sunset.

The primary benefits of landscaping and street trees are as set forth below.

1. Improved aesthetic appeal of nearby parcels.

2. Green space within the urban environment.

3. Enhances wind breaks.

4. Improved erosion resistance.

5. Improved dust control.

6. Tends to instill a sense of pride within the neighborhood.

7. The enhancement of the value of property which results from the foregoing benefits.

The primary benefits of municipal parks are as set forth below.

1. Designated sites where children may gather to play without danger from traffic.

2. Designated sites where adult, youth and family activities can take place (i.e., picnics, baseball and softball leagues, soccer leagues, other athletic activities, art festivals, animal shows and training, etc.)

3. Green space and open space within the urban environment.

4. Availability of public restrooms.

5. The enhancement of the value of property which results from the foregoing benefits.

Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 9
The primary benefits of street lighting are set forth below:

1. Improvement to traffic circulation and reduction in nighttime accidents and attendant human misery and decrease in personal property loss.

2. The deterrence of crime and the aid to police protection.

3. Promotion of business during nighttime hours.

4. Increased nighttime safety on roads and highways.

5. The improved ability of pedestrians and motorists to see, which helps people safely find their way.

6. Improved ingress and egress to lots and parcels.

7. Reduction in vandalism and other criminal acts, and reduced damage to improvements.

8. The enhancement to the value of property which results from the foregoing benefits.

6.2 Assessment Formula
The basic formula used to calculate the amount spread to each lot or parcel within the District for each type of improvement or facility starts with an AU. The basic AU is given a value of one (1) for a single-family residential parcel. From this base, the remaining land use types are related according to their equivalent special benefit within a zone or future annexation. The purpose of this formula is to fairly equate special benefit conferred on property with differing land uses for each type of improvement or facility within a zone (e.g., single-family residential versus commercial office versus vacant property, for street lighting).

6.3 Assessment Unit Method
The following table shows the assessment formula using the AU method for common land uses:

Land Use
Landscaping
Assessment
Formula
Lighting
Assessment
Formula
Park
Assessment
Formula
Graffiti
Removal
Drainage
Assessment
Formula
Residential
Single Family

1.0 AU per
Residential Unit

1.0 AU per
Residential
Unit

1.0 AU per
Residential Unit

1.0 AU per
Residential
Unit
Commercial/
Industrial

3.0 AU per
Assessable Acre

3.0 AU per
Assessable
Acre

3.0 AU per
Assessable Acre

3.0 AU per
Assessable
Acre
Apartments 0.6 AU per Parcel 0.6 AU per
Parcel

0.6 AU per
Parcel

0.6 AU per
Parcel
Public Schools 0.0 AU per Parcel

0.5 AU per
Assessable
Acre

0.0 AU per
Parcel

0.5 AU per
Assessable Acre

0.5 AU per
Assessable
Acre
Churches 0.5 AU per
Assessable Acre

0.5 AU per
Assessable
Acre

0.5 AU per
Assessable Acre

0.5 AU per
Assessable
Acre
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 10

6.4 Consumer Price Index (CPI) Inflation
The original assessment formula states that the maximum assessments will be increased annually based on the change in the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County CPI as of January published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics; provided, however, that any annual increase shall not exceed seven and one-half percent (7.5%).

In January 2018, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) updated their geographic areas for computing CPI.

Previously, the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County index was made up of Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura counties. The BLS divided this index into two areas; one that represents Los Angeles and Orange counties (Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim) and another that represents Riverside and San Bernardino counties (Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario).

On June 19, 2018 a resolution was adopted by the City determining that the CPI to be used for future calculation of the maximum assessments is the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario Index beginning with the Fiscal Year 2019/20 calculation.

Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 11

7. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
The assessment diagrams for each zone have been prepared in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and are on file with the City. The lines and dimensions shown on maps of the County Assessor for the current year are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this report. All parcels of real property included within the District are described in detail on the assessor’s maps.

Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 12

8. ASSESSMENT ROLL
A listing of assessor’s parcels subject to the assessments for Fiscal Year 2026/27, along with the assessment amounts, is on file in the office of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference. Based on County Assessor’s secured roll data, current assessor’s parcels, including corrected and/or new assessor’s parcels, will be submitted and/or resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The annual assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel(s) shall be determined in accordance with the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this report. Therefore, if a single assessor’s parcel has a status change in development, other land use change, or subdivides into multiple assessor’s parcels, the charge amounts applied to each of the new assessor’s parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method outlined in the method of apportionment and assessment rate rather than a proportionate share of the original assessment amount
June 16, 2026
TO: City Council

REQUESTED
BY:

Kimberly Ganimian, Finance Director

APPROVED
BY:

Travis Randel, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT:

Proposed Resolution for Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 1 (the “District”) FY 2026- 2027 Annual Levy of Assessments
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council ADOPT Resolution No. 4133 confirming a diagram and assessment and levying the assessment for the District for FY 2026-2027.

DISCUSSION:

On June 2, 2026, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 4126 declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments within the District for FY 2026-2027 accepting the Engineer’s Report (the “Report”), giving notice and setting the time and place of the public hearing of the proposed assessment. The Report has been filed with the City Clerk and is available for review by the public.

The public hearing was duly noticed and the Resolution of Intent published, setting the public hearing for Tuesday, June 16, 2026, at 6:30 p.m.

Taxable parcels are assessed 100% of the maximum allowed as set forth in the Report for FY 2026-2027. The maximum allowed to be collected is not sufficient to cover the full cost of the current level of service provided to the District, therefore the FY 2026-2027 budget contains a subsidy from the General Fund to cover costs. Pursuant to Article XIIID of the California Constitution, approval by the property owners in the District is required in order to increase the assessment.

The assessment will be placed on the property owner’s tax bill for FY 2026-2027, payable with the ad valorem tax bill in two installments due on November 1, 2026 (delinquent December 10, 2026) and February 1, 2027 (delinquent April 10, 2027).

The adoption of this Resolution is required in order to continue the levy assessment of the District and to authorize its collection with the annual general levy secured property tax roll.

FISCAL IMPACT:

This action sets the annual levy and authorizes it to be collected on the tax roll. The estimated Revenue and Expenditures were budgeted for the District under Fund 025. There is no budgetary impact, unless this Resolution is not passed. Non-passage of Resolution No. 4133 would impair the ability of the District to collect the assessments needed to pay the District expenses and the services provided in the District would be discontinued or the General Fund would have to replace the entire revenue of the District.

The levy of approximately $659,602 is not enough to fund the budgeted expenditures of the District. Staff has estimated a budget subsidy of approximately $1,201,317 from the General Fund to make up the District shortfall.

Attachments
Resolution No. 4133 - LLPD 1 Levying Assessments.pdf
6-16-26 LLPD No. 1 FY 26-27 Engineer's Report.pdf
Resolution No. 4133

Page 1 of 4 ends

STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) RESOLUTION NO. 4133
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss

CITY OF SAN JACINTO )

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN

JACINTO CONFIRMING DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT FOR
LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING, AND PARK DISTRICT NO. 1 (LLPD NO. 1) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Jacinto has initiated proceedings for the levy and collection of assessments for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 for LLPD No. 1 pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 (commencing with Section 22500) of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code (the “Act”), which, among other things, scheduled a public hearing on the levy and collection of assessments on the lots and parcels of assessable property within LLPD No. 1 of the City of San Jacinto, and WHEREAS, notice of said hearing was given pursuant to Section 22626 and duly published as required by Sections 22552 and 22553 of said Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council has ordered the filing of an Engineer’s Report (the “report”) with the City Clerk, pursuant to law for the City Council’s consideration and subsequently thereto the City Council adopted its Resolution of Intention approving the report, and declaring the intention of the City Council to order the levy and collection of assessments to pay the costs and expenses of maintaining the landscaped areas, street lights and public parks in LLPD No. 1 for the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2026 and ending June 30, 2027; and
WHEREAS, in November, 1996 the voters of the State of California passed Proposition 218 which added Articles XIIIC and XIIID to the California Constitution requiring, among other things, new procedures for the approval of the levying of assessments against real property; and
WHEREAS, Article XIIID, Section 4 of the California Constitution requires that assessments comply with state procedural and approval provisions by July 1, 1997, unless and Assessment District meets certain exemptions as set forth in Section 5 of Article XIIID, which exemptions include the following:
“(a) any assessment imposed exclusively to finance capital costs or maintenance and operation expenses for sidewalks, streets, sewers, water, flood control, drainage system or vector control.” “(b) any assessment imposed pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the assessment at the time the assessment is initially imposed”; and
Resolution No. 4133

Page 2 of 4 ends

WHEREAS, assessments proposed for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 are exempt from Proposition 218 because the assessments either generate revenue for the operation and maintenance of streets and highways, all expenditures thereunder qualifying as street maintenance as defined by the State of California, or the assessments were approved by the property owners on June 16, 1992, originally imposed prior to the passage of Proposition 218; and
WHEREAS, the adoption of this Resolution, among other things, is required to levy the proposed assessment for Fiscal Year 2026-2027; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, determined and ordered by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, as follows:

SECTION 1: Following notice duly given by publication, the City Council has held a public hearing regarding the levy of the proposed assessment within LLPD No. 1 for the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2026 and ending June 30, 2027 to pay for the costs and expenses of maintaining and servicing the public landscaped improvements, street lights and parks installed and constructed within LLPD No. 1.

All interested persons were afforded the opportunity to hear and be heard regarding protests and objections have been considered by the City Council.

SECTION 2: The City Council hereby confirms the diagram and assessment set forth in the report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 and orders the maintenance and servicing of the public landscaped improvements, street lights and parks installed and constructed in LLPD No. 1 and as more particularly described in the report.

SECTION 3: The adoption of this Resolution constitutes the levy of an assessment for the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2026 and ending June 30, 2027. Said assessment is levied without regard to property valuation.

SECTION 4: The maintenance and servicing of the public landscaped areas, street lights and parks shall be performed pursuant to law and the County Auditor of Riverside County shall enter on the County Assessment Roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount of the assessment and such assessment shall then be collected at the same time and in the same manner as the County taxes are collected. After collection by the County, the net amount of the assessments shall be paid to the City Treasurer.

Resolution No. 4133

Page 3 of 4 ends

SECTION 5: The City Treasurer shall deposit all moneys representing assessments collected by the County to the credit of a special fund known as LLPD No. 1 Fund.

SECTION 6: The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file the assessment with the County Auditor, together with a certified copy of this Resolution upon its adoption.

SECTION 7: A certified copy of the assessment diagram shall be filed in the office of the City Clerk and open for public inspection.

APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of June 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

CITY OF SAN JACINTO:
__________________________________
Crystal Ruiz, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Julia Espinoza, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

City Attorney
Best Best & Krieger, LLP
Resolution No. 4133

Page 4 of 4 ends

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss

CITY OF SAN JACINTO )
I, Julia Espinoza, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 4133 was passed, approved, and adopted at the Regular Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council held on the 16th day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL on the 16th day of June 2026. ______________________________
Julia Espinoza, City Clerk
City of San Jacinto
Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report For:

Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 1
May 2026

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. ENGINEER’S LETTER ........................................................................................................1

2. OVERVIEW......................................................................................................................2

3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS ..................................................4

3.1 Landscaping and Park Maintenance .......................................................................4

3.2 Street Lights and Traffic Signals ..............................................................................4

3.3 Street Trees.............................................................................................................5

4. ESTIMATE OF COSTS .......................................................................................................6

5. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT.......................................................................................7

5.1 Method of Apportionment......................................................................................7

5.2 Zones of Benefit ......................................................................................................8

5.3 Assessment Formula ...............................................................................................9

6. ASSESSMENT UNIT (“AU”) METHOD.............................................................................. 11

7. BOUNDARIES AND ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM................................................................... 15

8. ASSESSMENT ROLL........................................................................................................ 16

Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 1 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 2

2. OVERVIEW
This District, by special benefit assessments, provides funding for the installation, operation, maintenance and servicing of: street lights and traffic signals, landscaped areas (parkways and medians, etc.) and municipal parks; on a citywide basis; all of which are located on public land, public rights-of-way, or in landscaping easements within the City.

In November of 1996, the voters of California passed Proposition 218 which added Articles XIII C and XIII D to the California Constitution. These Constitutional provisions affect the procedural and substantive requirements for the levy of assessments. Among other things, the requirements provide that assessed parcels of real property must receive a special benefit from assessments. Assessments are also subject to new majority protest requirements. These new requirements apply, unless an assessment district meets certain exemptions set forth in Proposition 218.

The following assessments are exempt from the procedures and approval process of Article XIII D of the California Constitution:

A. Any assessment imposed exclusively to finance the capital costs or maintenance and/or operation expenses for sidewalks, streets, sewers, water, flood control, drainage systems, or vector control; or B. Any assessment imposed pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the assessment at the time the assessment is initially imposed.

Zone A (Including Sub-Zones A-1, A-2 and A-3), Zone B and Zone E of the District qualify as existing assessments exempt under exemption "A" described above. This conclusion has been reached using the definitions provided by the Office of the Controller for the State of California and the Guidelines Relating to Gas Tax Expenditures published by the division of local government affairs. Under this definition, street improvements include, but are not limited to, such things as street lighting and parkway and median landscaping.

Zone D park maintenance assessments within the District also qualify as an existing assessment exempt under exemption "B" described above in that the park maintenance assessment imposed was consented to by all of the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the park maintenance assessment at the time the assessment was initially imposed. The language of Articles XIII C and XIII D will be subject to future legislation and court decisions in order to clarify the specific intent of these Constitutional provisions. At the time that this report was prepared no such legislation or judicial guidance existed with regard to determining how the property owner consent exemption would apply. However, the drafter of these provisions, the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, has stated that it intended to exempt from the procedural and substantive requirements those assessments being re-levied on an annual basis under an existing assessment district so long as the assessments are not increased. The proposed assessments for the 2026/27 Fiscal Year for the District fall within this exemption because they are merely the annual levy for assessments previously consented to by property owners, and are not being increased.

Section 22573, of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the “1972 Act”), requires assessments to be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. The section states:

Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 1 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 3
"The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.

The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]."
The 1972 Act also provides for the classification of various areas within an assessment district into different zones where, “by reason of variations in the nature, location and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive differing degrees of benefit from the improvements. A zone shall consist of all territory which will receive substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements." An assessment district may consist of contiguous or noncontiguous areas.

Although Proposition 218 mandates that parcels owned by public agencies be assessed if they receive special benefit from the improvements being serviced and maintained by the assessments; under the exemptions stated above, properties owned by public agencies, such as city, county, state, federal government, or board-governed special districts, are not assessed.

The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this report, refers to an individual property assigned its own assessor’s property identification number by the Riverside County Assessor’s Office. The Riverside County Auditor/Controller uses assessor’s property identification numbers and specific fund numbers to identify, on the tax roll, properties assessed for special district benefit assessments.

Following consideration of public comments at a noticed public hearing, and review of the Final Annual Engineer’s Report, the City Council may confirm the report as submitted and order the levy and collection of assessments for Fiscal Year 2026/27. If approved, the assessment information will be submitted to the Riverside County Auditor/Controller and included on the property tax roll for each benefiting parcel for Fiscal Year 2026/27.

Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 1 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 4

3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS
Plans and specifications for the improvements have been prepared and approved as part of the improvement plans. These plans and specifications are on file and available for review at the office of the City Engineer and, by reference, have been made part of this report.

3.1 Landscaping and Park Maintenance
A map showing the location of all landscaping sub-zones and park maintenance areas within the District is on file at City Hall with the City Clerk and is made a part of this report by reference.

Servicing means the furnishing of:

1. Water for the irrigation of any landscape, park improvement, the operation of any fountains, or the maintenance of any other appurtenant improvements.

2. Electric current or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for any public lighting facilities or for the lighting or operation of any other improvement.

Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of any improvement, including:

1. Installation, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any landscape, park improvement, including turf, shrub and tree plantings, statuary, fountains, other ornamental structures, lights, electrical systems, playground equipment, play courts, paving, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and public restrooms.

2. Removal of graffiti by washing, painting, grinding, sanding, or other usual means.

3. Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury.

4. The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste.

5. Land preparation which may be necessary for the installation, repair or replacement of landscape, park improvements, irrigation systems, sidewalks and drainage, including grading, leveling, cutting, filling, and sod.

3.2 Street Lights and Traffic Signals
A map showing the location of all street lights within the District is on file at City Hall with the City Clerk and is made a part of this report by reference.

Servicing means the furnishing of electric current or energy, gas or other illuminating agent for public street lighting and traffic signal facilities.

Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual installation, maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including the repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of a component of the street lighting system, traffic signal system, or appurtenant horizontal or vertical surfaces (including graffiti removal).

Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 1 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 5

3.3 Street Trees
Reference to Street Trees throughout this report is only a description of improvements that were proposed during initial formation of the District. The assessment for street trees, although approved by property owners during the initial formation of the District, was not levied by the City prior to the passage of Proposition 218. As such, since the District has been grandfathered in under the assessment methodology and assessment rates existing prior to Proposition 218, the assessment for street trees cannot be levied unless additional property owner approval is secured through the procedures outlined in Proposition 218.

Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 1 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 6

4. ESTIMATE OF COSTS
The following table provides an estimate of the costs of the improvements for Fiscal Year 2026/27.

Parks Cost Item
A-1 A-2 A-3 B C D Totals
City-wide Soboba Springs Rancho San Jacinto Lights No Lights $413,726 $16,743 $97,467 $155,178 $683,114
Maintenance & Operations
Supplies & Materials 2 0 0 500 0 0 500
Professional & Specialized Services 3 36,000 3,443 8,000 3,000 3,000 53,443 Repair & Maintenance 4
Contracts, Leases & Rents 5 128,750 52,483 355,000 60,664 153,500 750,397 Utilities 6 55,000 30,500 337,500 150,000 115,000 688,000 Overhead, Insurance & Bonds 30,294 6,770 0 32,763 49,337 119,164 Capital Outlays
(126,046) (72,853) (198,899)
Interfund Transfer (Equipment Replacement) (25,000) (3,000) (28,000) CSA 152 (206,800) (206,800)
(383,967) (71,421) (592,421) (7,510) (145,999) (1,201,318) TOTALS $254,802 $38,518 $77,000 $238,917 $0 $50,363 $659,602 Amount per AU 34.76 229.96 77.00 25.89 0.00 14.67
Rounding and Adjustments 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0 TOTAL AMOUNT TO ASSESSMENT $659,602
Notes:

2. Supplies and Materials include office supplies, uniforms and safety equipment, small tools, etc.

3. Professional and Specialized Services include assessment engineering, legal counsel, City administration and County Auditor fees.

4. Repair and Maintenance includes building and vehicle R&M, parts and supplies for landscaping, irrigation and mowing, and street light R&M.

5. Contracts, Leases and Rents include weekend restroom maintenance, landscape maintenance contracts, traffic signal maintenance provided by Riverside County/CALTRANS, and vertical surface maintenance (graffiti abatement).

6. Utilities include water, electricity, and street light maintenance provided by SCE and City of San Jacinto.

8. Subject to available funds.

Landscaping Lighting

CITY OF SAN JACINTO
LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND PARK DISTRICT No. 1

MAINTENANCE ESTIMATE
FISCAL YEAR 2026/27

BENEFIT ZONES

7. Fund Transfer from Rancho San Jacinto LLPD No. 2 funds to finance the LLPD No. 2 component of shared facilities in Rancho San Jacinto, and to account for the LLPD No. 2 zones that don't have parks and contribute to the City-wide parks.

Cost Items
Personnel Services 1
Interfund Transfer (LLPD No. 2) 7
Interfund Transfer (General Fund) 8

1. Personnel Services is calculated based on estimated hours and a fully-burdened hourly rate, which includes amounts for salaries, fringe benefits, and other departmental operating expenditures that cannot be directly assigned to one zone. Accordingly, all other expenditures are those directly charged to each zone.

Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 1 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 7

5. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT

5.1 Method of Apportionment
The net amount to be assessed upon lands within the District in accordance with this report is apportioned by a formula and method which fairly distributes the amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated special benefit to be received by each lot or parcel from the improvements, namely the maintenance and servicing of public landscaping, lighting and park facilities within such District.

The maintenance and servicing of public landscaping, lighting and park facilities installed and constructed in public places in the City provides a special benefit which is received by parcels within the specified zones of benefit in the District. Landscaping within the District enhances the aesthetic appeal of parcels within the landscaping zones. Such landscaping improves erosion resistance and dust control. Street lights improve ingress and egress from lots or parcels by illuminating access after sunset. Such street lights, by so improving ingress and egress, improve the security of such lots or parcels by improving the nighttime visibility of such lots or parcels and improve the access of emergency vehicles thereto and in the case of commercial lots or parcels, facilitate the opening and operation of business uses after sunset.

The primary benefits of landscaping are set forth below:

1. Improved aesthetic appeal of nearby parcels.

2. Green space within the urban environment.

3. Enhances wind breaks.

4. Improved erosion resistance.

5. Improved dust control.

6. Tends to instill a sense of pride within the neighborhood.

The primary benefits of municipal parks are as set forth below:

1. Designated sites where children may gather to play without danger from traffic.

3. Green space and open space within the urban environment.

4. Availability of public restrooms.

The primary benefits of street lighting are set forth below:

1. Improvement to traffic circulation and reduction in nighttime accidents and attendant human misery and decrease in personal property loss.

2. The deterrence of crime and aid to police protection.

3. Promotion of business during nighttime hours.

4. Increased nighttime safety on roads and highways.

Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 1 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 8

5. The improved ability of pedestrians and motorists to see, which helps people safely find their way.

6. Improved ingress and egress to lots and parcels.

7. Reduction in vandalism and other criminal acts, and reduced damage to improvements.

5.2 Zones of Benefit
The 1972 Act provides for areas within a district to be classified into different zones of benefit. The District is divided into separate zones and sub-zones for funding landscaping, lighting and park improvements. The various zones and sub-zones are delineated on the Assessment Diagram on file in the office of the City Clerk.

5.2.1 LANDSCAPING ZONES
Landscaping is divided into three (3) benefit sub-zones. These sub-zones are labeled A-1, A-2 and A-3 and are comprised of the areas described below:

Landscape Zone Descriptions:

1. Subzone A-1: All parcels in the fully inhabited areas of the City approximately bounded by the San Jacinto River, the southerly City Limit, the northerly prolongation of Pine Avenue, De Anza Drive, the San Diego Aqueduct, and the northerly City Limit to the San Jacinto River; with the exception of Subzones A-2 and A-3; and excluding parcels in Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2.

2. Subzone A-2: All parcels in the Soboba Springs (Village IV) Tract.

3. Subzone A-3: All parcels in the Rancho San Jacinto area that are not in Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2.

5.2.2 STREET LIGHTING ZONES
Street lighting is divided into two (2) benefit zones. These zones are labeled Zone B (lighted areas) and Zone C (non-lit outlying areas) and are comprised of the areas described below:

Street Lighting Zone Descriptions:

1. Zone B: Those parcels within the boundary of the District that have street lights installed within close proximity or that are surrounded by areas that have street lights.

2. Zone C: Those parcels within the boundary of the District that have no street lights within a reasonable distance. These parcels are primarily in outlying areas with little or no population.

5.2.3 PARKS ZONE
Parks are comprised of a single citywide benefit zone designated Zone D and as described below:

Parks Zone Description:

1. Zone D: All parcels within the District that are included in existing residential uses (including apartments, condominiums, PUD's, mobile home parks, recreational vehicle parks, etc.); Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 1 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 9
commercial/industrial uses; and churches/fraternal organizations; and are included in petitions signed when they were developed. No vacant parcels are included.

5.3 Assessment Formula
The formula used to calculate the amount spread to all parcels within the District for landscaping, street lighting, and parks starts with the basic assessment unit (“AU”). The basic AU is given a value of one (1) for a single-family residential parcel. From this base, the remaining parcels are related according to their equivalent benefit within each benefit zone or sub-zone. Zone A parcels are assessed for landscaping separately in three (3) sub-zones. Zone B parcels are assessed for street lighting and Zone C parcels are not assessed for street lighting. Zone D residential and commercial/industrial parcels containing dwelling units or business establishments are assessed for municipal parks.

Vacant parcels (agricultural, residential or commercial/industrial) are assigned 0.5 AU for landscaping and street lighting because they have a partial benefit due to the overall enhancement of the area and to the increase in accessibility from the installation and/or maintenance and servicing of said public improvements. Vacant parcels are not assessed for park maintenance.

Commercial/industrial and public utility parcels are assigned 3.0 AU per acre (1.0 AU minimum, 10.0 AU maximum) for landscaping, street lighting, and parks based upon the fact that one acre of commercial/industrial property is the equivalent of three single-family residences.

Small residences (less than 1,000 square feet and/or less than 50 feet of frontage) (Riverside County Land Use Code "RS") are assessed at a rate of 0.7 AU for landscaping and 1.0 AU for all other improvements due to smaller frontages relative to landscaping, but have the same benefit as other single-family residences from street lights and park maintenance.

Condominiums and PUD's are assigned 0.9 AU for each type of maintenance because, although these units have most of the characteristics of a single-family residence, they generally are somewhat smaller and have common areas and homeowner associations.

Apartments and common unit condominiums are assigned 0.6 AU per apartment unit for landscape maintenance and 0.8 AU for each of the other types of indicated public improvement because apartment units are typically smaller than a single-family residence.

Mobile homes are assigned 0.5 AU per mobile home unit for landscaping and 0.7 AU for street lighting and parks because these units are generally smaller than a single-family residence or condominium.

Recreational vehicle (RV) parks (own or rental) are assigned 0.3 AU for landscape maintenance and 0.7 AU for street lighting and parks for the same reasons cited for mobile homes, except that RV parks often have high vacancies, especially during the summer months.

Railroad parcels are assessed 0.5 AU per acre (1.0 AU minimum, 5.0 AU maximum) for street lighting only because street lighting causes a reduction in vandalism on railroad property and increases safety at railroad crossings, but receives less benefit than does a single-family residence because of the reduced activity on railroad tracks.

Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 1 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 10
Churches and fraternal organizations are assigned 0.5 AU per acre (1.0 AU minimum, 4.0 AU maximum) for each type of indicated public improvement because these parcels obtain benefit from each type of improvement, but at a reduced rate due to the periodic use of the property.

Assessments by zone, if applicable, are additive. As the land use on any specific parcel changes from one fiscal year to the next, the applicable assessment rate shall also change to reflect the change in land use.

Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 1 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 11

6. ASSESSMENT UNIT (“AU”) METHOD
The following table shows the assessment formula using the AU method for the most common County land use codes.

CITY OF SAN JACINTO
LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND PARK DISTRICT NO. 1

ASSESSMENT FORMULA USING ASSESSMENT UNIT (AU) METHOD
Land Use
Code Land Use
Zone A Landscaping
Assessment Formula
Zone B Lighting
Assessment Formula
Zone D Park
Assessment Formula
AA Agricultural Avocado Grove 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel AC Agricultural Citrus Grove 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel AD Agricultural Dairy 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel AI Agricultural Irrigated Farm 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel AL Agricultural Livestock 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel AN Agricultural Non-Irrigated 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel AO Agricultural - Other Crops 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel AP Agricultural Poultry 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel AR Agricultural Residential 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit AS Agricultural w/Structures 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel AV Agricultural Vineyard 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel AY Agricultural Vacant 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel A1 Agricultural Other 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel CA Apartments 0.6 AU per Unit 0.8 AU per Unit 0.8 AU per Unit CF Churches, Fraternal Orgs. 0.5 AU per Acre (1.0 AU min, 4.0 AU max)

0.5 AU per Acre
(1.0 AU min, 4.0 AU max)

0.5 AU per Acre
(1.0 AU min, 4.0 AU max)
Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 1 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 12

3.0 AU per Acre
(1.0 AU min, 10.0 AU max)

3.0 AU per Acre
(1.0 AU min, 10.0 AU max)
CR Commercial w/Residences 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit CY Commercial Vacant 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel C1
Commercial/Industrial

3.0 AU per Acre
(1.0 AU min, 10.0 AU max)

3.0 AU per Acre
(1.0 AU min, 10.0 AU max)
EP Exempt Public Property Exempt Exempt Exempt
HO Homeowner's Assn, Open Space Exempt Exempt Exempt
MF Mobile home Legal Foundation 0.5 AU per MH Parcel 0.7 AU per MH Parcel 0.7 AU per MH Parcel ML Mobile home, Leased Lot 0.5 AU per MH Parcel 0.7 AU per MH Parcel 0.7 AU per MH Parcel MO Mobile home Assessed 0.5 AU per MH Parcel 0.7 AU per MH Parcel 0.7 AU per MH Parcel MP Mobile home Rental/Lease Lot 0.5 AU per MH Unit 0.7 AU per MH Unit 0.7 AU per MH Unit MR Mobile home Lot Only 0.5 AU per MH Parcel 0.7 AU per MH Parcel 0.7 AU per MH Parcel MT Mobile home - Transient 0.3 AU per MH Unit 0.5 AU per MH Unit 0.5 AU per MH Unit M0 Mobile home Assessed 0.5 AU per MH Parcel 0.7 AU per MH Parcel 0.7 AU per MH Parcel M1 Mobile home Assessed 0.5 AU per MH Parcel 0.7 AU per MH Parcel 0.7 AU per MH Parcel PA Ag Preserve Avocado Grove 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 1 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 13

ASSESSMENT FORMULA USING ASSESSMENT UNIT (AU) METHOD
(Continued)
Land Use
Code Land Use
Zone A Landscaping
Assessment Formula
Zone B Lighting
Assessment Formula
Zone D Park
Assessment Formula
PC Ag Preserve Citrus Grove 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel PD Ag Preserve Dairy 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel PI Ag Preserve Irrigated Farm 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel PL Ag Preserve Livestock 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel PN Ag Preserve Non-Irrigated 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel PO Ag Preserve Other Crops 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel PP Ag Preserve Poultry 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel PR Ag Preserve Residential 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit PS Ag Preserve w/Structures 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel PV Ag Preserve Vineyard 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel PY Ag Preserve Vacant 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel P1 Ag Preserve Other 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel PX Ag Preserve 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel R- Residential 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit RA Residential Agriculture 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit RC Residential Condo/PUD 0.9 AU per Condo/PUD Unit 0.9 AU per Condo/PUD Unit 0.9 AU per Condo/PUD Unit R1 Residential Single Family 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 1 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 14

ASSESSMENT FORMULA USING ASSESSMENT UNIT (AU) METHOD
(Continued)
Land Use
Code Land Use
Zone A Landscaping
Assessment Formula
Zone B Lighting
Assessment Formula
Zone D Park
Assessment Formula
R2 Residential Duplex/Triplex 0.8 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit RS Residential Small 0.7 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit RR Railroad Parcels 0.0 AU per Parcel

0.5 AU per Acre
(1.0 AU min, 5.0 AU max) 0.0 AU per Parcel
RV Recreational Vehicle Lot 0.3 AU per RV Parcel 0.5 AU per RV Parcel 0.5 AU per RV Parcel UP Public Utility

3.0 AU per Acre
(1.0 AU min, 10.0 AU max)

0.0 AU per Parcel
YD Vacant Desert 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel YM Vacant Mountainous 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel YP Vacant - Prob. Residential 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel YR Vacant Residential 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel YS Vacant Land Miscellaneous 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel YY Vacant Remainder 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel

ASSESSMENT FORMULA USING ASSESSMENT UNIT (AU) METHOD
(Continued)
Notes:

1. Zone C is not assessed.

2. Public Utilities include gas, electricity, telephone, cable TV, etc. Public utility parcels are assessed in the same manner as commercial property because public utilities are “for profit” enterprises.

3. The fraternal organization category includes such organizations as the Elks Lodge, Moose Lodge, IOOF, Order of Eagles, Mason's, Women's Clubs, etc.

4. Public property includes that property that is exempt from assessment including property owned by the City, County, State, Federal Government, water districts and other special districts.

Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 1 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 15

7. BOUNDARIES AND ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
The boundaries of the District are completely within the City limits as shown on the maps on file with the City. The map below is for illustration purposes only. The boundary map and assessor’s maps serve as the assessment diagram for the District. The lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor for the current year are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this report. All parcels of real property included within the District are described in detail on the assessor’s maps.

Parcels within Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2, an assessment district formed in April 2002 and subsequent annexations thereto, that are within the boundaries of the District are not levied the District assessments.

Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 1 – City of San Jacinto Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 16

8. ASSESSMENT ROLL
The assessment roll is provided on the following pages. The description of each lot or parcel as part of the records of the County Assessor are by reference made part of this report.

Full list of parcels available at the San Jacinto City Clerk's Office June 16, 2026
TO: City Council

REQUESTED
BY:

Kimberly Ganimian, Finance Director

APPROVED
BY:

Travis Randel, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution for Assessment District 2003-1 FY 2026-2027 Annual Levy RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council ADOPT Resolution No. 4132 confirming a diagram and assessment and levying the assessment for Assessment District 2003-1 for FY 2026-2027.

DISCUSSION:

Assessment District 2003-1 is divided among 39 zones subject to assessments. The District Engineer’s report is presented as part of the resolution to confirm the Diagram and Levy an Assessment for FY 2026-2027. A copy of the Engineer’s report is included for your reference.

This is the twenty-first year that assessments will be levied in Assessment District 2003-1. The Engineer’s Report for FY 2026- 2027 proposes assessments of approximately $1,405,512 in 38 zones and approximately 3,855 parcels.

Only properties receiving special benefits, including an initial operating reserve set up, are being assessed to the property owners in FY 2026-2027. Therefore, not all parcels and zones annexed into Assessment District 2003-1 are being assessed either fully or partially in FY 2026-2027.

Assessment District 2003-1 is a post-Proposition 218 district. Every year, the maximum assessment rate is increased by the December Engineer News-Record Construction Cost Index for Los Angeles, not to exceed 6.0%, but the actual assessment levies are based on the actual costs incurred up to the maximum assessment amount.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The total proposed levy for the Assessment District 2003-1 is $1,405,512. The levies are paid only by property owners who are in the District. All property tax revenue received by the City for this District is restricted and can only be used to fund services for the District.

Attachments
Resolution No. 4132 - AD 2003-1 Levying Assessments.pdf 6-16-26 AD 2003-1 FY 26-27 Engineer's Report.pdf
Resolution No. 4132

Page 1 of 4 ends

STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) RESOLUTION NO. 4132
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss

CITY OF SAN JACINTO )

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SAN JACINTO CONFIRMING DIAGRAM AND
ASSESSMENT FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2003-1
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027
WHEREAS, on October 6, 2003, the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of San Jacinto (the “City”) formed Assessment District No. 2003-1 (the “Assessment District”) pursuant to the Benefits Assessment Act of 1982 (Government Code Section 54703 et seq.) (the “Act”) to finance the maintenance of street, road and highway improvements through the levy of assessments therein; and WHEREAS, NBS, as assessment engineer for the Assessment District, has prepared an engineer’s report for the Fiscal Year 2026-2027 assessment levy (the “Engineer’s Report”);
WHEREAS, subsequent to the formation of the Assessment District, several properties under development were annexed to the Assessment District; WHEREAS, the City has determined that the Assessment District must commence the annual assessment levy in Fiscal Year 2026-2027 in order to maintain street, road and highway improvements within the Assessment District; and WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to levy the assessment in accordance with the Engineer’s Report.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, determined and ordered by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto as follows:

Section 1. Findings. The City Council finds that:
(i) the preceding recitals are correct;
(ii) compliance has been had with all of the applicable requirements of the Act;
(iii) a majority protest to the levy and collection of the proposed assessment has not been filed;
(iv) the City Council may therefore proceed to confirm the diagram and assessment for the Assessment District for Fiscal Year 2026-2027; and order the levy and collection of the assessment;
Resolution No. 4132

Page 2 of 4 ends

(v) the assessments proposed to be levied on the lots and parcels of assessable property within the Assessment District for the maintenance of streets, road and highways during Fiscal Year 2026- 2027 as contained in the Engineer’s Report on file with the City Clerk (the “Report”), are based on the proportionate special benefits derived by such lots and parcels from the availability of such street, road and highway improvements;
(vi) the proportionate special benefits derived by each such lot or parcel has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of such street, road and highway improvements; (vii) such assessments do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefits conferred on each such lot and parcel; and
(viii) such assessments will not exceed the maximum amounts of the assessments authorized by a vote of the property owners in the Assessment District.

Section 2. Levy of Assessment.

Pursuant to the Act, the adoption of this resolution constitutes the levy of the assessment for the maintenance of street, road and highway improvements within the Assessment District during Fiscal Year 2026-2027, as contained in the Report, and such assessment is hereby levied. The City Clerk is directed to file a certified copy of this resolution together with the diagram and assessment contained in the Report with the County Auditor of the County of Riverside, who shall enter on the County Assessment Roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon, as shown in said assessment.

APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of June 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Resolution No. 4132

Page 3 of 4 ends

CITY OF SAN JACINTO
___________________________
Crystal Ruiz, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Julia Espinoza, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
City Attorney
Best Best & Krieger LLP
Resolution No. 4132

Page 4 of 4 ends

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss

CITY OF SAN JACINTO )
I, Julia Espinoza, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 4132 was passed, approved, and adopted at the Regular Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council held on the 16th day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL on the 16th day of June 2026. ______________________________
Julia Espinoza, City Clerk
City of San Jacinto
Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report For:

Assessment District No. 2003-1
May 2026

TABLE OF CONTENTS
ENGINEER’S LETTER ........................................................................................................1 OVERVIEW......................................................................................................................2

2.1 Introduction...............................................................................................................2 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS ..................................................3

3.1 Street Sweeping ........................................................................................................3

3.2 Slurry Seal..................................................................................................................3

3.3 Grind and Overlay .....................................................................................................3

3.4 Remove and Reconstruct ..........................................................................................3 ESTIMATE OF COSTS .......................................................................................................4 METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT.......................................................................................6 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM..................................................................................................9 ASSESSMENT ROLL........................................................................................................ 10

Assessment District 2003-1 – City of San Jacinto
Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 2

OVERVIEW

2.1 Introduction
This Annual Engineer’s Report (the “Report”) describes the City of San Jacinto Assessment District No. 2003-1 and the assessment levy for Fiscal Year 2026/27 based on the historical and estimated cost to maintain the improvements and provide the services that benefit parcels within the District. The District is divided into multiple Zones to allow the assessments to properly match the special benefits provided by the improvements to the assessed parcels within the District. This District, by special benefit assessments, provides funding for the maintenance of interior streets within the boundaries of the District, including street sweeping, slurry seal, grind and overlay of existing pavement, and replacement of damaged curb, sidewalk, and pavement. Each type of service is described in Section 3.

Assessment District 2003-1 – City of San Jacinto
Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 3

PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS
Plans and specifications for the improvements have been prepared and approved as part of the improvement plans. These plans and specifications are on file and available for review at the office of the City Engineer and, by reference, have been made part of this report.

3.1 Street Sweeping
This service shall consist of cleaning the streets within the District’s boundary by City forces or by public works contract. The street cleaning will be consistent with the current level of service for existing streets within the City limits.

The City negotiated an agreement in 2013 with CR&R in which CR&R would perform street sweeping services twice per month at no cost to the City. At that time and for subsequent years, the District budget and corresponding assessment levies were adjusted to reflect reduced costs for street sweeping.

3.2 Slurry Seal
This service shall consist of providing a slurry seal or asphaltic coating over pavement areas within the District on an average interval of four years. The service shall be performed by City forces or by public works contract, and shall include all required striping and traffic control associated with the work. Slurry seal operations will not occur in interval years where grind and overlay or replacement activities, as described below, are scheduled.

3.3 Grind and Overlay
This service shall consist of grinding out the upper two inches (approximately) of asphalt paving and replacing it with a new layer of asphalt on an average interval of twelve years. The service shall be performed by City forces or by public works contract, and shall include all required striping and traffic control associated with the work. Grinding and overlay operations shall not occur within interval years where Remove and Reconstruct operations, as described below, are scheduled.

3.4 Remove and Reconstruct
It is estimated that approximately every 36 years the asphaltic layer of the pavement structural section will need to be removed and replaced. In addition, it is assumed that 10% of curb and sidewalk improvements will need to be repaired or replaced, due to normal damage and deterioration. This service shall consist of such removals and replacements and shall be performed by City forces or by public works contract, and shall include all required striping and traffic control associated with the work.

Assessment District 2003-1 – City of San Jacinto
Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 4

ESTIMATE OF COSTS
The estimated costs for Fiscal Year 2026/27 include maintenance, servicing and administrative costs. The table reflects the maximum and actual assessment amounts based on such estimated costs.

Zone Description
Maximum
Rate per Lot
or Acre
Maximum
Assessment
per Zone(3)
% of
Maximum
to Levy
Actual
Rate Per
Lot or Acre
Total
Estimate of
Costs
1 – Sunset Ranch $451.96 $29,377.95 98.64% $445.82 $28,978.30 2 – Goldencrest 358.50 51,983.93 98.28% 352.34 51,089.30 3 – Park Meadows 385.46 65,529.17 98.33% 379.02 64,433.40 4 – Goldencrest 422.41 32,526.22 98.57% 416.36 32,059.72 5 – Summerfield Ranch 391.81 32,129.17 98.85% 387.30 31,758.60 6 – Durango 431.40 57,376.69 98.70% 425.78 56,628.74
7 – Park Hill 400.58 53,678.51 98.11% 393.00 52,662.00
8 – Mosaico 457.40 41,623.89 98.66% 451.26 41,064.66
9 – Stallions Crossing 436.38 44,947.42 99.01% 432.06 44,502.18 10 – Meadowbrook 328.67 69,350.40 98.44% 323.54 68,266.94 11 – Potter Ranch 370.93 97,554.61 98.55% 365.54 96,137.02 12 – Sandalwood 445.97 56,193.44 98.33% 438.52 55,253.52 13 – Remington/Lyndon Trails 321.99 65,365.59 98.07% 315.78 64,103.34 14 – San Jacinto Ranch 455.38 31,421.44 98.44% 448.26 30,929.94 15 – Parkside Village 349.30 48,902.58 98.45% 343.88 48,143.20 16 – Coventry Acres 350.13 68,625.87 98.22% 343.88 67,400.48 17 – Creekside 370.72 53,013.04 98.54% 365.30 52,237.90 18 – Belicia 410.36 25,032.19 98.56% 404.44 24,670.84
19 – Almaden 480.19 42,257.29 98.78% 474.32 41,740.16
20 – Cottonwood Ranch 307.19 40,242.03 98.17% 301.56 39,504.36 21 – Tamarisk 347.43 87,900.41 98.34% 341.66 86,439.98
22 – Groove Not Assessed
23 – CNH 337.27 30,691.86 57.82% 195.00 17,745.00
24 – The Cove 455.82 62,903.69 98.72% 449.98 62,097.24
28 – The Cove 420.51 45,415.25 98.69% 415.00 44,820.00
29 – Cameo Homes Not Assessed
30 – Distinctive Homes 340.80 17,721.65 98.53% 335.78 17,460.56 31 – Ron Clark Ernesto Ruiz Not Assessed
32 – Griffin Communities 423.28 15,661.44 98.49% 416.88 15,424.56 33 – Meadowbrook II 443.22 25,263.94 98.58% 436.92 24,904.44 34 – Catalpa 354.99 41,179.78 98.28% 348.88 40,470.08
35 – Osborne – Cheyenne 518.15 15,026.45 98.80% 511.92 14,845.68 36 – RSI Park Avenue (Lots 13-
15, 25-31) 872.58 8,725.85 99.13% 864.98 8,649.80
Assessment District 2003-1 – City of San Jacinto
Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 5
Zone Description
Maximum
Rate per Lot
or Acre
Maximum
Assessment
per Zone(3)
% of
Maximum
to Levy
Actual
Rate Per
Lot or Acre
Total
Estimate of
Costs
36 – RSI Park Avenue (Lots 12,
32) 436.29 872.58 99.13% 432.48 864.96
36 – RSI Park Avenue (Lots 1-
11, 16-24, 33-35) (1) 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00
37 – Shaver 739.74 7,397.46 99.39% 735.22 7,352.20
38 – KS Development 675.66 7,432.35 0.00% 0.00 0.00
39 – Shea 310.27 99,599.40 73.17% 227.02 72,873.42
40 – Kalpesh 452.76 20,374.41 0.00% 0.00 0.00
41 – Carolino 815.71 11,420.05 0.00% 0.00 0.00
42 – DBN Parkside Medical 19,522.63 39,045.26 0.00% 0.00 0.00 Totals $1,543,763.47 $1,405,512.52
(1) Lots 1-11, 16-24, and 33-35 within Zone 36 will receive no special benefit in Fiscal Year 2026/27 and therefore will not be levied.
(2) The maximum rate per acre for Zone 42 is based on a net acreage of 15.74 at the time of annexation into the District.
(3) Slight variances may occur due to rounding
Assessment District 2003-1 – City of San Jacinto
Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 6

METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
Assessments levied pursuant to the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 must be based on the benefit to the parcel, which will be derived from the provision of the services. The services funded by the assessments levied within each Zone include the maintenance of interior streets within such Zone. The formation engineer determined the services funded by a given Zone provide direct and special benefit to property within such Zone.

Typically, identification of the benefits associated with maintenance services is the first step in developing the assessment spread methodology. The District will provide short term and long term maintenance of the streets within each Zone. The resulting benefits to the parcels within each Zone consist of, but are not limited to the following:

1. Safe vehicular and pedestrian access; and

2. Clean and presentable streets and gutters.

In order to allocate the assessments in proportion to the special benefits that each parcel will receive from the services, an in-depth analysis was performed for each Zone upon annexation to the District, since each Zone has its own interior street facilities. The analysis entailed three component tasks: (1) identification of service costs, (2) allocation of costs, and (3) calculation of assessments. The maximum assessment per lot or acre for each Zone was calculated upon annexation to the District.

The initial assessment calculation assumed that if the total number of residential lots or developable acreage within a Zone changed based on the recordation of a final map, the total annual cost would be reallocated to the actual number of residential lots or developable acreage within such Zone.

The method of apportionment and initial maximum assessment rates were prepared and approved as part of each Zone annexation’s Engineer’s Report. The Engineer’s Report for each Zone annexation is on file and available for review at the office of the City Clerk and, by reference, have been made part of this report.

Each year, the maximum assessment rate escalates by an amount equal to the percentage change in the Engineering News-Record Construction Cost Index for Los Angeles (the “Construction Cost Index”), measured as of the month of December in the calendar year which ends in the previous fiscal year, with a maximum annual increase of six percent (6.00%) and a minimum annual increase of zero percent (0.00%).

For Fiscal Year 2026/27, the maximum assessments increased by 0.888%.

The table on the following page describes the method of apportionment per Zone for Fiscal Year 2026/27.

Assessment District 2003-1 – City of San Jacinto
Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 7
Zone Assessable Per
Count of Lots or
Acres(1)(2)
1 – Sunset Ranch Residential Lot 65
2 – Goldencrest Residential Lot 145
3 – Park Meadows Residential Lot 170
4 – Goldencrest Residential Lot 77
5 – Summerfield Ranch Residential Lot 82
6 – Durango Residential Lot 133
7 – Park Hill Residential Lot 134
8 – Mosaico Residential Lot 91
9 – Stallions Crossing Residential Lot 103
10 – Meadowbrook Residential Lot 211
11 – Potter Ranch Residential Lot 264
12 – Sandalwood Residential Lot 126
13 – Remington/Lyndon Trails Residential Lot 203
14 – San Jacinto Ranch Residential Lot 69
15 – Parkside Village Residential Lot 140
16 – Coventry Acres Residential Lot 196
17 – Creekside Residential Lot 143
18 – Belicia Residential Lot 61
19 – Almaden Residential Lot 88
20 – Cottonwood Ranch Residential Lot 131
21 – Tamarisk Residential Lot 253
22 – Groove Not Assessed
23 – CNH Residential Lot 102
24 – The Cove Residential Lot 138
28 – The Cove Residential Lot 108
29 – Cameo Homes Not Assessed
30 – Distinctive Homes Residential Lot 52
31 – Ron Clark Ernesto Ruiz Not Assessed
32 – Griffin Communities Residential Lot 37
33 – Meadowbrook II Residential Lot 57
34 – Catalpa Residential Lot 116
35 – Osborne – Cheyenne Residential Lot 29
36 – RSI Park Avenue (Lots 13-15, 25-31) Residential Lot 10 36 – RSI Park Avenue (Lots 12, 32) Residential Lot 2
36 – RSI Park Avenue (Lots 1-11, 16-24, 33-35) Residential Lot 0 37 – Shaver Residential Lot 10
38 – KS Development Residential Lot 11
Assessment District 2003-1 – City of San Jacinto
Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 8
Zone Assessable Per
Count of Lots or
Acres(1)(2)
39 – Shea Residential Lot 321
40 – Kalpesh Residential Lot 45
41 – Carolino Residential Lot 1 lot (14 units)
42 – DBN Parkside Medical Developable Acre 15.74 acres
Assessment District 2003-1 – City of San Jacinto
Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 9

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
The assessment diagrams for each Zone are on file and available for review at the office of the City Clerk, and are incorporated herein by reference. The lines and dimensions shown on maps of the County Assessor for the current year are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this report. All parcels of real property included within the District are described in detail on the assessor’s maps.

Assessment District 2003-1 – City of San Jacinto
Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report 10

ASSESSMENT ROLL
A listing of assessor’s parcels subject to the assessments for Fiscal Year 2026/27, along with the assessment amounts, is on file in the office of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference. Based on County Assessor’s secured roll data, current assessor’s parcels, including corrected and/or new assessor’s parcels, will be submitted and/or resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The annual assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel(s) shall be determined in accordance with the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this report. Therefore, if a single assessor’s parcel has a status change in development, other land use change, or subdivides into multiple assessor’s parcels, the charge amounts applied to each of the new assessor’s parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method outlined in the method of apportionment and assessment rate rather than a proportionate share of the original assessment amount.

June 16, 2026
TO: City Council

REQUESTED
BY:

Mathew Osborn, Water Utilities Superintendent

APPROVED
BY:

Travis Randel, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT: Adoption of the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan and 2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan RECOMMENDATION:

Staff Recommends that the City Council:

1. CONDUCT a Public Hearing to receive public comment and accept any protests.

2. ADOPT Resolution No. 4131, approving and adopting the City of San Jacinto 2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan.

3. ADOPT Resolution No. 4130, approving and adopting the City of San Jacinto 2025 Urban Water Management Plan.

4. AUTHORIZE staff to submit the adopted Water Shortage Contingency Plan and Urban Water Management Plan to the California Department of Water Resources, the California State Library, and any other required agencies.

BACKGROUND:

The City of San Jacinto prepared its 2025 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) in accordance with the Urban Water Management Planning Act and applicable sections of the California Water Code. Urban water suppliers are required to update their UWMP's at least once every five years. The 2025 UWMP must be adopted and submitted to the California Department of Water Resources by July 1, 2026.

The City is required to prepare an UWMP because it is classified as an urban water supplier. An urban water supplier is a water supplier that provides water for municipal purposes to more than 3,000 customers or supplies more than 3,000 acre feet of water annually. The City currently serves 4,604 municipal water connections and supplied 2,448 acre feet of water in 2025.

The UWMP is intended to serve as a long term water planning document. It evaluates the City’s existing and projected water demands, available water supplies, water service reliability, drought risk, demand management measures, and water shortage response actions. The UWMP also includes the standardized reporting tables required by the Department of Water Resources.

The California Water Code also requires urban water suppliers to prepare and adopt a Water Shortage Contingency Plan. The City’s 2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan (WSCP) is included as Chapter 8 of the UWMP. Although it is included within the UWMP, it also functions as a stand alone planning document for water shortage response. For that reason, staff is recommending that the City Council ADOPT the UWMP and the WSCP by separate resolutions.

DISCUSSION:

The 2025 UWMP summarizes the City’s projected water demands, available water supplies, water service reliability, drought planning, conservation efforts, and shortage response actions through the year 2050. This staff report provides the key information from the UWMP in a summary format so the City Council can review the major planning assumptions, projected demands, supply sources, reliability findings, and required adoption actions without needing to read through the entire UWMP.

Plan Preparation and Required Elements
The City’s 2025 UWMP was prepared as an individual UWMP specific to the City of San Jacinto’s water service area. The UWMP uses calendar year data and reports water quantities in acre feet. The City coordinated with Eastern Municipal Water District as part of the preparation of the UWMP and provided the required water use projections to Eastern Municipal Water District for regional planning purposes.

The 2025 UWMP includes service area information, water use characterization, water supply characterization, SB X7 7 target reporting, water service reliability, a five year Drought Risk Assessment, demand management measures, and the WSCP. The appendices include the Department of Water Resources standardized tables, the completed Plan checklist, reduced reliance documentation, public hearing notices, climate change information, groundwater management information, the San Jacinto Basin Judgment, Ordinance No. 09 16, local hazard mitigation information, water rates, and adoption resolutions.

Plan Content Purpose
Service Area Description
Identifies the City water service area, current population, projected population, climate, and land use planning assumptions.

Water Use Characterization Summarizes 2025 water use and projected demands through 2050 by customer category.

Water Supply Characterization Identifies groundwater from the San Jacinto Basin and treated groundwater from Eastern Municipal Water District as the City’s water supply sources.

Water Service Reliability Compares projected supplies and demands during normal year, single dry year, and multiple dry year conditions.

Drought Risk Assessment
Evaluates the City’s ability to meet demands during a five consecutive year drought period.

Water Shortage Contingency
Plan
Provides the City’s shortage response framework, including six shortage levels, demand reduction actions, communication protocols, enforcement, and monitoring.

Service Area and Population
The City owns and operates a water distribution system that serves a portion of the City of San Jacinto. The water service area covers approximately 4 square miles and is located in Riverside County at the base of the San Jacinto Mountains. The UWMP identifies a 2025 water service area population of 20,938. The service area population is projected to increase to 25,970 by 2050. These population projections are used to evaluate future demands, future supply needs, and overall water service reliability.

Year Population
2025 20,938
2030 21,675
2035 22,879
2040 23,866
2045 24,896
2050 25,970
Water Demand
The City’s total 2025 potable water use was 2,448 acre feet. The largest water use category was single family residential, followed by commercial, multi family residential, institutional and governmental, distribution system water loss, landscape, industrial, and agricultural use. The UWMP includes distribution system water loss because it is a required component of UWMP reporting and supports ongoing system performance tracking. 2025 Water Use Category Volume, Acre Feet
Single Family 1,267
Multi Family 342
Commercial 347
Industrial 42
Institutional and Governmental 218
Landscape 85
Agricultural 1
Distribution System Water Loss 146
Total Potable Water Use 2,448
Future Water Demands
The demand projections were developed using the City’s current water use, customer categories, anticipated population growth, and water conservation assumptions. Total potable water demand is projected to increase from 2,692 acre feet in 2030 to 3,224 acre feet in 2050. This represents an increase of 532 acre feet from 2030 to 2050, which is generally associated with anticipated growth in the City’s water service area.

Year Projected Total Water Demand, Acre Feet
2030 2,692
2035 2,842
2040 2,964
2045 3,092
2050 3,224
Water Supplies
The City’s water supplies consist primarily of groundwater pumped from the San Jacinto Basin. The City also has the ability to receive treated groundwater from Eastern Municipal Water District when needed for emergency purposes, operational needs, or to supplement City supplies. In 2025, the City’s actual water supplies totaled 2,448 acre feet. Of that amount, 1,436 acre feet came from City groundwater wells and 1,012 acre feet came from Eastern Municipal Water District wells all located in the San Jacinto Basin.

The City’s projected future supplies are anticipated to come primarily from the City’s own groundwater wells in the San Jacinto Basin. Water from Eastern Municipal Water District is not intended to be a regular supply source and would be used for emergency situations, operational needs, or when necessary to supplement City supplies. The UWMP also identifies a future water supply project consisting of a new intertie with Eastern Municipal Water District to improve emergency water supply reliability.

Groundwater Supply
Groundwater from the San Jacinto Basin remains the City’s primary local water supply. The San Jacinto Basin is adjudicated and managed by the Hemet San Jacinto Watermaster. Local groundwater production is a key part of the City’s long term water reliability. San Jacinto’s groundwater production over the last five years has varied based on operational conditions, well availability, water quality, and the use of supplemental treated groundwater from Eastern Municipal Water District.

Year Groundwater Pumped (Acre Feet)
2021 2,611
2022 2,572
2023 1,820
2024 2,403
2025 1,436
Water Service Reliability
The 2025 UWMP evaluates the City’s ability to meet projected demands during normal year, single dry year, and multiple dry year conditions. The UWMP compares projected supplies to projected demands through 2050. Based on the supply and demand comparisons included in The UWMP, the City’s planned supplies are projected to meet demands through 2050 under normal, single dry, and multiple dry year conditions.

Drought Risk Assessment
The 2025 UWMP includes a five year Drought Risk Assessment. The Drought Risk Assessment reviews the City’s ability to provide water during a five consecutive year drought period. This assessment considers projected water supplies, projected water demands, historical drought hydrology, potential supply constraints, and available management tools. The Drought Risk Assessment is intended to help the City plan for an extended drought rather than only reviewing a single year supply condition.

Water Shortage Contingency Plan
Chapter 8 of the UWMP is the City’s 2025 WSCP. The WSCP provides a detailed approach for how the City will respond to an actual or anticipated water shortage. The WSCP includes procedures for the Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment, water shortage levels, shortage response actions, supply augmentation options, demand reduction measures, operational changes, emergency response planning, seismic risk planning, communication protocols, enforcement procedures, financial considerations, monitoring requirements, and future Plan updates.

The WSCP includes six standard water shortage levels. These levels create a consistent and progressive response structure based on the severity of the shortage. Shortage response actions may include public outreach, increased conservation messaging, voluntary or mandatory restrictions, operational changes, enforcement of water waste restrictions, and other actions necessary to respond to water shortage conditions.

Water Shortage Level Shortage Range
Level 1 Up to 10 percent
Level 2 Up to 20 percent
Level 3 Up to 30 percent
Level 4 Up to 40 percent
Level 5 Up to 50 percent
Level 6 Greater than 50 percent
Demand Management Measures and Conservation
The UWMP includes a discussion of the City’s demand management measures. These measures are intended to reduce water demands, improve water use efficiency, and help the City meet water use targets. The City’s demand management measures include water waste prevention ordinances, metering, conservation pricing, public education and outreach, programs to assess and manage distribution system real loss, and water conservation program coordination and staffing support.

The City meters customer connections and reports water use by customer category. The City also uses a rate structure that promotes water conservation. The UWMP states that the City met its 2020 water use target through implementation of demand management measures. The City’s SB X7 7 target was 147 gallons per capita per day.

The City’s actual 2020 use was 131 gallons per capita per day, and the City met its 2020 target.

Water Loss Reporting
The City submitted annual water loss audit information for each year from 2020 through 2024. Water loss reporting is required as part of the UWMP process and is used to evaluate distribution system performance and progress toward water loss standards. The UWMP identifies the State Water Board’s calculated 2028 water loss standard and compares it with the City’s most recent water loss audit. This information helps the City continue tracking real and apparent water losses and supports future operational planning.

Recycled Water
The UWMP identifies that recycled water is not currently used within the City’s water service area and is not currently planned for direct use within the service area. Wastewater collected from the City’s water service area is treated by Eastern Municipal Water District at the San Jacinto Valley Regional Water Reclamation Facility. The UWMP also recognizes regional efforts related to water supply reliability and reduced reliance on imported water supplies, including groundwater management, water use efficiency, and potential regional recycled water replenishment efforts.

Reduced Reliance on Imported Water Supplies
The appendices include documentation regarding reduced regional reliance on imported water supplies. The City primarily relies on groundwater produced from the San Jacinto Basin and can receive treated groundwater from Eastern Municipal Water District also pumped from the San Jacinto Basin. The City’s demand management measures, groundwater basin management efforts, and local supply planning support reduced reliance on imported water supplies.

Public Hearing, Adoption, and Submittal
A Public Hearing is required prior to adoption of the UWMP and the WSCP. The City has made the draft documents available for public review and has provided notice of the public hearing in accordance with applicable requirements. The City Council is being asked to adopt the 2025 UWMP and the 2025 WSCP by separate resolutions.

Following adoption, staff will submit the adopted UWMP and WSCP to the California Department of Water Resources within 30 days of adoption and by the required July 1, 2026 deadline. Staff will also submit the required documents to the California State Library and make the adopted documents available to the public as required.

Adoption of both plans will allow the City to satisfy California Water Code requirements and maintain eligibility for certain State administered water grants and loans.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

Adoption of the 2025 UWMP and the 2025 WSCP is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act because the action consists of adopting planning documents and does not approve a specific construction project or physical change to the environment.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no direct fiscal impact associated with adoption of the 2025 UWMP and the 2025 WSCP. Adoption of the plans helps maintain compliance with State requirements and supports continued eligibility for certain State administered water grants and loans.

Attachments
City of San Jacinto - 2025 Urban Water Management Appendices Draft.pdf City of San Jacinto - 2025 Urban Water Management Draft.pdf City of San Jacinto - 2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan Draft.pdf Resolution No. 4130 - 2025 UWMP.pdf
Resolution No. 4131 - WSCP.pdf

CITY OF SAN JACINTO
2025 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN

APPENDIX A

DWR STANDARDIZED TABLES
CA3310032 City of San Jacinto 4,604 2,448
4,604 2,448
Submittal Table 2-1 Retail: Public Water Systems
Add additional rows as needed
NOTES:

Volume of Water
Supplied 2025 (AF)
DWR NOTES:

Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure selected in Submittal Table 2-3.

Total
Public Water System
Number
Public Water System
Name
Number of Municipal
Connections 2025
Select
One
Name of Regional Alliance or
RUWMP (Drop Down List)
NOTES:

Submittal Table 2-2: Plan Identification
Type of Plan
Individual UWMP
If Water Supplier is also a member of a SB X7-7
Regional Alliance, select name from the dropdown.

Regional Urban Water Management Plan (RUWMP)
If Supplier selected RUWMP, select name from
the drop-down.

Supplier is a wholesale supplier
Supplier is a retail supplier
UWMP Tables are in calendar years
UWMP Tables are in fiscal years
Unit AF
Submittal Table 2-3: Supplier Identification
Type of Supplier (select one or both)
Fiscal or Calendar Year (select one)
If using fiscal years provide month and date that the fiscal year begins (mm/dd)
Units of measure used in UWMP
(Select from the drop down list).
01/01
DWR NOTES:

Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent
throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.

NOTES:

Submittal Table 2-4 Retail: Water Supplier Information Exchange Water Code Section 10631(h)
The retail Supplier has informed the following wholesale supplier(s) of projected water use.

Wholesale Water Supplier Name
Add additional rows as needed
Eastern Municipal Water District
NOTES:
2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050(opt)
20,938 21,675 22,879 23,866 24,896 25,970
Submittal Table 3-1 Retail: Population - Current and Projected Water Code Section 10631(a)
Population
Served
NOTES:

Use Type
Drop down list
May select each use multiple times
These are the only use types that will be
recognized by the WUEdata online submittal tool
Potable or NonPotable
(OPTIONAL)
Drop down list
Volume (AF)
Single Family Potable 1,267
Multi-Family Potable 342
Commercial Potable 347
Industrial Potable 42
Institutional/Governmental Potable 218
Landscape Potable 85
Agricultural Potable 1
Distribution System Water Loss Potable 146
2448
0 Total 2,448
Submittal Table 4-1 Retail: Total Uses for Potable and Non-Potable Water — Actual Water Code Section 10631(d)(1)
NOTES:

DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure selected in Submittal Table 2-3. 2025 Actual Water Use
Add additional rows as needed
Subtotal Potable
Subtotal Non-Potable
Additional Description
(as needed)
Use Type
Drop down list
May select each use multiple times
These are the only Use Types that will be
recognized by the WUEdata online submittal tool
Potable or Non-Potable
(OPTIONAL)
Drop down list
2030 (AF) 2035 (AF) 2040 (AF) 2045 (AF) 2050 opt (AF)
Single Family Potable 1,393 1,470 1,534 1,600 1,669
Multi-Family Potable 376 397 414 432 450
Commercial Potable 382 403 420 438 457
Industrial Potable 46 49 51 53 55
Institutional/Governmental Potable 239 253 264 275 287
Landscape Potable 94 99 103 108 112
Agricultural Potable 1 1 1 1 1
Distribution System Water Loss Potable 161 170 177 185 193 2,692 2,842 2,964 3,092 3,224
0 0 0 0 0
2,692 2,842 2,964 3,092 3,224
Add additional rows as needed.

Submittal Table 4-2 Retail: Total Uses for Potable, and Non-Potable Water — Projected Water Code Section 10631(d)(1)
Projected Water Use
(Report To the Extent that Records are Available)
Additional Description
(as needed)
NOTES:

Total
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure selected in Submittal Table 2-3.

Subtotal Non-Potable
Subtotal Potable
Are Future Water Savings Included in Projections?
Drop down list (y/n)
Yes
If "Yes" to above, state the section or page number, in the cell to the right, where citations of the codes, ordinances, or otherwise are utilized in demand projections are found.

Optional Suppliers may complete Optional Submittal Table 4-4 R to quantify the expected savings.

Section 4.2.5
and Chapter
8 Are Lower Income Residential Demands Included In Projections? Drop down list (y/n)
Yes
Optional If the method for accounting Lower Income Residential Demands has been included, provide page number where this accounting can be found.

Submittal Table 4-3 Retail: Inclusion in Water Use Projections Water Code Section 10631 (a), 10631 (d)(4)(A), and 10631 (d)(4)(B) NOTES:

DWR NOTES: Additional guidance is provided in Appendix K.

Public Water System ID #
Reported in Table 2-1 R Reporting Period
Submitted to DWR Water
Loss Audit Program
(yes/no)
2020 Yes
2021 Yes
2022 Yes
2023 Yes
2024 Yes
Submittal Table 4-5 Retail: Water Loss Audit Reporting
Water Code Section 10631(d)(3)(A)
CA3310032
DWR NOTES: Suppliers will provide a link to the WUEdata submittals of their Water Loss Audit Reports.

NOTES:

Report submittal status for all five years for each Public Water System as available.

Add rows as needed
2028 Real Water Loss
Standard per Unit per
day
Units for Real Water Loss
Drop down list
Number of Units
(Connections or Miles corresponding
with units selected)
Volume of Total Real
Loss
(from AWWA Water
Loss Audit)
(AF)
2028 Apparent Water Loss
Standard per Unit
per Day
Units for
Apparent Water
Loss
Number of
Connections
Volume of Total
Apparent Loss
(from AWWA Water
Loss Audit)
(AF)
CA3310032 Yes 21.3
Gallons per
Service
Connection per
Day (GPSCD)
4600 79.183 15.4 4.0
Gallons per
Service
Connection per
Day (GPSCD)
4600 12.045 2.3
Gallons per
Service
Connection per
Day (GPSCD)
Gallons per
Service
Connection per
Day (GPSCD)
Submittal Table 4-6 Retail: Progress Towards 2028 Water Loss Standard Water Code Section 10631(d)(3)(C)
NOTES:

Apparent Water Loss
Did the Water Board Calculate
a Water Loss Standard for this
Public Water System? (y/n)
If no, Supplier will not
complete this row.

Real Water Loss
Water Board's Calculated Water Loss Standards
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) for Water Loss MUST remain consistent with units reported in Submittal Table 2-3. The units reported in Submittal Table 2-3 are used in this table's calculations.

Public Water
System ID #
Reported in
Submittal Table 2-
1 R
Add additional rows as needed.

Most Recent AWWA Water Loss Audit
Real Water
Loss Per Unit
per Day
Most Recent AWWA Water Loss Audit
Apparent Water
Loss Per Unit per
Day
State Water Board Standard State Water Board Standard
Actual 2025 GPCD
(From SB X7-7
Compliance Form)
Did Supplier meet
the 2020 Target in
2025?
No Individual
Target
147 131 Yes NA
Submittal Table 5-1 Retail: SB X7-7 2020 Target Progress Water Code Section 10608.40
NOTES:

Did Supplier
Achieve Targeted
Reduction for
2020?
Actual 2020
GPCD
2020 Target
Regional
Alliance Target
or Individual
Target?
Drop down list
DWR NOTES:

Suppliers calculating a 2025 GPCD will need to complete and submit SB X 7-7 Compliance Tables to verify the use of SB X7-7 Methodologies.

Suppliers that were part of a merger or consolidation since 2020 see Chapter 5 and Appendix P for guidance.

NA=Not Applicable
Check the box if the Supplier was not an Urban Water Supplier during or before the 2020 UWMP reporting cycle.

Proceed to the next table.

Only for suppliers that did not meet
the Target in 2020
See DWR NOTES below. Was Supplier part of
a merger or
consolidation since
2020?
Groundwater Type
Drop Down List
May use each category
multiple times
Potable or
Non-Potable
(OPTIONAL)
Drop down list
Location or Basin Name 2021 (AF) 2022 (AF) 2023 (AF) 2024 (AF) 2025 (AF) Alluvial Basin Potable San Jacinto Basin 2611 2572 1820 2403 1436 2,611 2,572 1,820 2,403 1,436
Add additional rows as needed
Submittal Table 6-1 Retail: Groundwater Volume Pumped
Water Code Section 10631(4) and 10631(4)(c)
DWR NOTES:

Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure selected in Submittal Table 2-3.

NOTES
Total
Check the box if the Supplier does not pump groundwater.

Proceed to the next table.

Check the box if all or part of the groundwater described below is desalinated. (OPTIONAL) Name of Wastewater
Collection Agency
Wastewater
Volume
Metered or
Estimated?

OPTIONAL
Drop Down List
Volume of
Wastewater Collected
from UWMP Service
Area 2025 (AF)
Name of Wastewater
Treatment Plant (WWTP) and
Place ID Number
Drop down list
Is WWTP
Located Within
UWMP Area?
Drop Down List
Eastern Municipal Water
District
Estimated 882
San Jacinto Valley RWRF,
Place ID 259193 No
882
Check the box if there is no wastewater collection system.

Proceed to the next table.

NOTES:

Submittal Table 6-2 Retail: Wastewater Collected Within Service Area Water Code Section 10633(a)
Percentage of 2025 service area population served by wastewater collection system (OPTIONAL)
Percentage of 2025 service area served by wastewater collection system (OPTIONAL) DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure selected in Submittal Table 2-3.

Additional Guidance: See Appendix M, Section M.21 for detailed guidance on this table.

Wastewater Collection Recipient of Collected Wastewater Total Wastewater Received from UWMP
Service Area in 2025:

Add additional rows as needed
Treatment
Level
Drop down list
Volume
(AF)
Treatment
Level
Drop down list
Volume
(AF)
Treatment
Level
Drop down list
Volume
(AF)
Treatment
Level
Drop down list
Volume
(AF)
Treatment
Level
Drop down list
Volume
(AF)
Name of other
entity
0 - 0 0 0 0 0
Submittal Table 6-3 Retail: Wastewater Treatment and Outcomes Within UWMP Service Area Water Code Section 10633(b)
DWR NOTES:

Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure selected in Submittal Table 2-3.

IPR: Indirect Potable Reuse would have the treatment level of its end use requirement in the Level of Treatment drop-down.

Additional Guidance: See Appendix M, Section M.21 for detailed guidance on this table.

Water Recycled Outside
of UWMP Service Area
(enter data as applicable)
Effluent Discharge that is
not a Permitted Recycled
Water Use
(enter data as applicable)
Required Discharge for
Instream Flow
(enter data as applicable)
Delivered to Another Entity for Additional
Treatment
(enter data as applicable)
Add additional rows as needed
2025 Outcomes of Treated Wastewater
Check the box if no wastewater is treated or disposed of within the UWMP service area.

Proceed to the next table.

Does This
Plant Treat
Wastewater
Generated
Outside the
UWMP Service
Area?
(OPTIONAL)
Drop down list
Wastewater
Treatment Plant
Name and Place ID
Number
Drop down list
Total 2025
Volume of
Water
Treated
(AF)
NOTES:

Total
2025 Volume
of Wastewater
Received from
UWMP Service
Area
(As Reported
in Submittal
Table 6-2 R)
(AF)
Water Recycled Within
UWMP Service Area
(enter data as applicable)
Volume Narrative page number
(OPTIONAL)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Use Type
Drop down list
Potable or Non-Potable
(after treatment if treated)
(OPTIONAL)
Drop down list
Additional Information
(as needed)
Add additional rows as needed
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure selected in Submittal Table 2-3.

Additional Guidance: See Appendix M, Section M.21 for detailed guidance on this table.

Potential recycled water use: a description of the feasibility of these uses must be included in the narrative.

Multiple Producers: If you have multiple recycled water producers, submit a separate table for each.

NOTES:
2025 (AF) 2030 (AF) 2050 (AF) 2035
(AF)
2040
(AF)
2045
(AF)
Subtotal Potable
Subtotal Non-Potable
Check box if recycled water is not used and is not planned for use within the service area of the supplier. The supplier will only complete the column on "Potential Recycled Water Use" and submit an accompanying narrative on the feasibility of that potential recycled water use.

Submittal Table 6-4 Retail: Recycled Water Direct Beneficial Uses Within Service Area Water Code Section 10633 (c),(d),(e)
Potential Recycled Water Use
Name(s) of Facility/ies Producing (Treating) the Recycled Water (OPTIONAL) :

Name of Supplier Operating the Recycled Water Distribution System (OPTIONAL) :

Volume of Supplemental Water Added in 2025 (OPTIONAL) :

Source of 2025 Supplemental Water (OPTIONAL) :
2020 Projection
for 2025 (AF)
2025 Actual
Use (AF)
0 0
NOTES:

Total
DWR NOTES:

Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure reported in Submittal Table 2-3
Additional Guidance: See Appendix M, Section M.21 for detailed guidance on this table.

Use Type
Drop Down list
Submittal Table 6-5 Retail: 2020 UWMP Recycled Water Use Projection Compared to 2025 Actual
Water Code Section 10633(e)
Check the box if recycled water was not used in 2025 nor previously projected for use in 2020.

Proceed to the next table.

Add additional rows as needed
Section 6.2.5
Name of Action Description
Expected Increase in Recycled
Water Use (AF)
0 0
Total (AF)
DWR NOTES:

Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) MUST remain consistent with units reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure selected in Submittal Table 2-3.

The unit conversion to Acre Feet addresses the Water Code's requirement that this value be provided in acre-feet.

NOTES:

Submittal Table 6-6 Retail: Methods to Encourage Future Recycled Water Use Water Code Section 10633(f)
Check the box if the Supplier does not plan to expand recycled water use in the future. Supplier will not complete the table below but will provide narrative explanation.

Provide page location of narrative in the UWMP
Add additional rows as needed
Unit Conversion to AF
Planned Implementation
Year
Section 6.2.10
Drop Down
List
(yes/no)
If Yes, Supplier Name
New Intertie Yes EMWD
For emergency water
supplies Potable 2026 All Year Types 3,200 AFY
Planned for Use
in Year Type
Drop Down List
NOTES:

Submittal Table 6-7 Retail: Expected Future Water Supply Projects or Programs Water Code Section 10631(f)
DWR NOTES:

Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure reported in Submittal Table 2-3.

Check the box if some or all of the supplier's future water supply projects or programs are not compatible with this table and are described in a narrative format.

Check the box if there are no expected future water supply projects or programs that provide a quantifiable increase to the agency's water supply.

Proceed to the next table.

Planned
Implementation
Year
Add additional rows as needed
Joint Project with other
suppliers? Expected
Increase in
Water Supply
to Supplier
(This may be
a range) (AF)
Provide page location of narrative in the UWMP
Name of Future
Projects or Programs
Additional Description
(as needed)
Potable or Non-Potable
(after treatment if treated)
(OPTIONAL)
Drop Down list
Water Supply
Drop down list
May use each category multiple
times. These are the only water
supply categories that will be
recognized by the WUEdata online
submittal tool
Potable or Non-Potable
(after treatment if treated)
(OPTIONAL)
Drop Down list
Actual Volume
(AF)
Total Entitlement
(OPTIONAL)
See 'DWR Notes'
below (AF)
Groundwater (not desalinated) San Jacinto Basin Potable 1,436 Purchased or Imported Water Treated groundwater purchased from EMWD Potable 1,012
2,448 0
0 0
2,448 0
Submittal Table 6-8 Retail: Water Supplies — Actual
Water Code Section 10631(b)
2025
NOTES:

DWR NOTES:

Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure selected in Submittal Table 2-3.

Total Entitlement: e.g. Water Right, Groundwater Allocation, Contracted Amount.

Add additional rows as needed
Total
Subtotal Potable
Subtotal Non-Potable
Additional Description
(as needed)
Water Supply
Reasonably
Available
Volume
(AF)
Total
Entitlement
(OPTIONAL)
See 'DWR Notes'
below (AF)
Reasonably
Available
Volume (AF)
Total
Entitlement
(OPTIONAL)
See 'DWR Notes'
below (AF)
Reasonably
Available
Volume
(AF)
Total
Entitlement
(OPTIONAL)
See 'DWR Notes'
below (AF)
Reasonably
Available
Volume (AF)
Total
Entitlement
(OPTIONAL)
See 'DWR Notes'
below (AF)
Reasonably
Available
Volume (AF)
Total
Entitlement
(OPTIONAL)
See 'DWR Notes'
below (AF)
Groundwater (not
desalinated) San Jacinto Basin Potable 2,692 2,842 2,964 3,092 3,224 Purchased or Imported
Water
Treated
groundwater
purchased from
EMWD
Potable 0 0 0 0 0
2,692 0 2,842 0 2,964 0 3,092 0 3,224 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2,692 0 2,842 0 2,964 0 3,092 0 3,224 0
2050 (opt)
Add additional rows as needed
Total
NOTES:
2030 2035 2040 2045
Subtotal Non-Potable
Subtotal Potable
DWR NOTES:

Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.

Total Entitlement: e.g. Water Right, Groundwater Allocation, Contracted Amount.

Submittal Table 6-9 Retail: Water Supplies — Projected Water Code Section 10631 (b) Projected Water Supply (Report to the Extent Practicable) Drop down list
May use each category
multiple times. These are the
only water supply categories
that will be recognized by the
WUEdata online submittal
tool
Additional Detail
on Water Supply
Potable or Non-Potable
(after treatment if treated)
(OPTIONAL)
Drop Down list
Water Delivery Product
drop down list
(If delivering more than one type of product recommend
using Table O-1C)
Retail Potable
Deliveries
Start Date of Reporting Period 1/1/2025
End Date of Reporting Period 12/31/2025
Is upstream embedded energy in the values reported? No
Units of Measure for Water AF
Total Utility
See DWR NOTES
Hydropower Net Utility
2,448 2,448
2,420,152 2,420,152
3,034 - 3,034
Quantity of Self-Generated Renewable Energy
936586 kWh
Data Quality (Estimate, Metered Data, Combination of Estimates and Metered Data) Combination of Estimates and Metered Data
Data Quality Narrative:

Narrative:

Optional Submittal Table O-1B: Recommended Energy Reporting - SINGLE DELIVERY PRODUCT - TOTAL UTILITY

APPROACH
The total energy consumed was identified based on Southern California Edison (SCE) billing records. Although the total energy consumed includes electricity usage for general administration (which is not an identified water management process), general administration energy use is considered to be negligible compared to overall water system use and has not been netted out.

Only for Water Delivery Products Under the Urban Water Supplier's Operational Control
Sum of All Water
Management Processes
Non-Consequential Hydropower
DWR NOTES:

Total Utility:The volume of water entered in the “Total Utility” column should equal the volume of water entering the distribution system (excluding recycled water); in most cases, this is the total volume calculated in UWMP Table 4-1: 2025 Actual Total Uses for Potable and Non-Potable Water. Note if recycled water is included in your Submittal Table 4-1, you must exclude it from your volume in this table.

NOTES:

The total energy consumption includes energy associated with operating groundwater production wells and booster pumps to deliver water in the distribution system. Energy consumption is associated with operating groundwater water treatment. Energy consumption is also associated with plant lighting and air conditioning, and operating the Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system and chlorination injection pumps. Self generated renewable energy is based off of solar panel power generation at the Artesia and Grand well sites.

Volume of Water Entering Process
Energy Consumed (kWh)
Energy Intensity (kWh/vol. converted to MG)
% of Average Supply
Average Year 2020 100%
Single-Dry Year 2017 103.1%
Consecutive Dry Years 1st Year 2011 104.9%
Consecutive Dry Years 2nd Year 2012 114.4%
Consecutive Dry Years 3rd Year 2013 111.8%
Consecutive Dry Years 4th Year 2014 106.6%
Consecutive Dry Years 5th Year 2015 85.7%
2650
2733
Year Type
Base Year
If not using a
calendar year, type
in the last year of
the fiscal, water
year, or range of
years, for example,
water year 2024-
2025, use 2025
Optional Submittal Table 7-1 Retail: Basis of Water Year Data (Reliability Assessment) Available Supplies if
Year Type Repeats
Check the box if quantification of available supplies
is not compatible with this table and is provided
elsewhere in the UWMP.

Location: [insert location from UWMP]
Volume Available (AF)
Quantification of available supplies is provided in this table as either volume only, percent only, or both.
2781
3031
NOTES:
2963
2824
2270
DWR NOTES: Supplier may use multiple versions of Submittal Table 7-1 R if different water sources have different base years and the supplier chooses to report the base years for each water source separately. If a Supplier uses multiple versions of Submittal Table 7-1 R, in the "Note" section of each submittal table, state that multiple versions of Submittal Table 7-1 R are being used and identify the particular water source that is being reported in each submittal table.

Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table reports the units of measure reported in Submittal Table 2-3. 2030 (AF) 2035 (AF) 2040 (AF) 2045 (AF) 2050 (AF)
Supply totals
(autofill from Submittal
Table 6-9 R)
2,692 2,842 2,964 3,092 3,224
Use totals
(autofill from Submittal
Table 4-2 R)
2,692 2,842 2,964 3,092 3,224
Surplus/(shortfall) 0 0 0 0 0
WSCP - supply
augmentation benefit
WSCP - use reduction
savings benefit
Revised Surplus/(shortfall)
OPTIONAL Planned WSCP Actions
Submittal Table 7-2 Retail: Normal Year Supply and Use Comparison Water Code Section 10635 (a)
NOTES:

DWR NOTES : Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.

Supply totals 2,776 2,931 3,057 3,189 3,325
Use totals 2,776 2,931 3,057 3,189 3,325
Surplus/(shortfall) 0 0 0 0 0
WSCP - supply
augmentation benefit
WSCP - use reduction
savings benefit
Revised
Surplus/(shortfall)
2050 (AF)
DWR NOTES : Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.

NOTES
Submittal Table 7-3 Retail: Single Dry Year Supply and Use Comparison Water Code Section 10635(a)
OPTIONAL Planned WSCP Actions
2030 (AF) 2035 (AF) 2040 (AF) 2045 (AF)
2030 (AF) 2035 (AF) 2040 (AF) 2045 (AF) 2050 (AF)
Supply totals 2,825 2,982 3,111 3,245 3,383
Use totals 2,825 2,982 3,111 3,245 3,383
Surplus/(shortfall) 0 0 0 0 0
WSCP - supply augmentation benefit
WSCP - use reduction savings benefit
Revised Surplus/(shortfall)
Supply totals 3,079 3,251 3,390 3,537 3,688
Use totals 3,079 3,251 3,390 3,537 3,688
Surplus/(shortfall) 0 0 0 0 0
WSCP - supply augmentation benefit
WSCP - use reduction savings benefit
Revised Surplus/(shortfall)
Supply totals 3,010 3,178 3,314 3,457 3,605
Use totals 3,010 3,178 3,314 3,457 3,605
Surplus/(shortfall) 0 0 0 0 0
WSCP - supply augmentation benefit
WSCP - use reduction savings benefit
Revised Surplus/(shortfall)
Supply totals 2,869 3,029 3,159 3,295 3,436
Use totals 2,869 3,029 3,159 3,295 3,436
Surplus/(shortfall) 0 0 0 0 0
WSCP - supply augmentation benefit
WSCP - use reduction savings benefit
Revised Surplus/(shortfall)
Supply totals 2,306 2,434 2,539 2,649 2,762
Use totals 2,306 2,434 2,539 2,649 2,762
Surplus/(shortfall) 0 0 0 0 0
WSCP - supply augmentation benefit
WSCP - use reduction savings benefit
Revised Surplus/(shortfall)
Submittal Table 7-4 Retail: Multiple Dry Years Supply and Use Comparison Water Code Section 10635(a)
OPTIONAL Planned WSCP Actions
Third year
Fifth year
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.

OPTIONAL Planned WSCP Actions
OPTIONAL Planned WSCP Actions
Fourth year OPTIONAL Planned WSCP Actions
NOTES:

First year
Second year OPTIONAL WSCP Actions
2026 Total
Total Water Use (AF) 2,620
Total Supplies (AF) 2,781
Surplus/Shortfall w/o WSCP Action 161
WSCP - supply augmentation benefit (AF)
WSCP - use reduction savings benefit (AF)
Revised Surplus/(shortfall)
2027 Total
Total Water Use (AF) 2,912
Total Supplies (AF) 3,031
Surplus/Shortfall w/o WSCP Action 119
WSCP - supply augmentation benefit (AF)
WSCP - use reduction savings benefit (AF)
Revised Surplus/(shortfall)
2028 Total
Total Water Use (AF) 2,901
Total Supplies (AF) 2,963
Surplus/Shortfall w/o WSCP Action 62
WSCP - supply augmentation benefit (AF)
WSCP - use reduction savings benefit (AF)
Revised Surplus/(shortfall)
2029 Total
Total Water Use (AF) 2,817
Total Supplies (AF) 2,824
Surplus/Shortfall w/o WSCP Action 7
WSCP - supply augmentation benefit (AF)
WSCP - use reduction savings benefit (AF)
Revised Surplus/(shortfall)
2030 Total
Total Water Use (AF) 2,306
Total Supplies (AF) 2,270
Surplus/Shortfall w/o WSCP Action (36)
WSCP - supply augmentation benefit (AF)
WSCP - use reduction savings benefit (AF) 36
Revised Surplus/(shortfall) 0
NOTES:

DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain
consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.

Submittal Table 7-5 Retail: Five-Year Drought Risk
Assessment
Water Code Section 10635(b)(3)
OPTIONAL Planned WSCP Actions (use reduction and supply augmentation)
OPTIONAL Planned WSCP Actions (use reduction and supply augmentation)
OPTIONAL Planned WSCP Actions (use reduction and supply augmentation)
OPTIONAL Planned WSCP Actions (use reduction and supply augmentation)
OPTIONAL Planned WSCP Actions (use reduction and supply augmentation)
Standard
Shortage
Levels
Percent
Shortage Range
Suppliers
Shortage
Levels
Percent Shortage
Range
1 Up to 10% 1 Up to 20%
2 Up to 20% 1 Up to 20%
3 Up to 30% 2 Up to 40%
4 Up to 40% 2 Up to 40%
5 Up to 50% 3 Up to 50%
6 >50% 3 50%
Submittal Table 8-1: Cross-reference for Standard vs
Supplier Shortage Levels
Water Code Section 10632(a)(3)(B)
Check the box if the Supplier uses the Standard
six levels of water shortage.

Proceed to the next table.

NOTES:

Yes
Volume or
Percentage
Drop down
Shortage Gap
Reduction Value
(May be a range)
(AF)
1 Transfers Volume 0 Not applicable (see Notes)
2 Transfers Volume 0 Not applicable (see Notes)
3 Transfers Volume 0 Not applicable (see Notes)
4 Transfers Volume 0 Not applicable (see Notes)
5 Transfers Volume 0 Not applicable (see Notes)
6 Transfers Volume 0 Not applicable (see Notes)
Submittal Table 8-2 Retail: Supply Augmentation and Other Actions Water Code Section 10632(a)(4)(A),(C) and (E)
Add additional rows as needed
NOTES: The City will consider increased production from the San Jacinto Basin using existing facilities to address increased demands. As noted on Table 8-3, the City plans to implement demand reduction measures in the event water supplies from existing sources are not sufficient to meet anticipated demands.

Is the Supplier completing this table using the standard six levels? (yes/no) How much is this going to reduce the
shortage gap?
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.

Shortage
Level
Supply Augmentation Methods and
Other Actions by Water Supplier
Drop down list
These are the only categories that will
be accepted by the WUEdata online
submittal tool
Additional Explanation or Reference
(OPTIONAL)
Yes
Volume or
Percentage
Drop down
Shortage Gap
Reduction Value
(May be a range)
(AF)
1 Landscape - Limit landscape
irrigation to specific times Volume
Collective reduction
from all Shortage
Level 1 actions is up
to 252 AF
Yes
1 Landscape - Other landscape
restriction or prohibition Volume
Collective reduction
from all Shortage
Level 1 actions is up
to 252 AF
Limit on Watering Duration Yes
1 Landscape - Restrict or prohibit
runoff from landscape irrigation Volume
Collective reduction
from all Shortage
Level 1 actions is up
to 252 AF
Yes
1 Other - Prohibit use of potable water for washing hard surfaces Volume Collective reduction
from all Shortage
Level 1 actions is up
to 252 AF
Yes
1 Water Features - Restrict water use
for decorative water features, such
as fountains
Volume
Collective reduction
from all Shortage
Level 1 actions is up
to 252 AF
Re-circulating water required for water
fountains and decorative water features Yes
1 Other - Prohibit vehicle washing
except at facilities using recycled or
recirculating water
Volume
Collective reduction
from all Shortage
Level 1 actions is up
to 252 AF
Yes
1 CII - Restaurants may only serve water upon request Volume Collective reduction
from all Shortage
Level 1 actions is up
to 252 AF
Yes
1 CII - Lodging establishment must
offer opt out of linen service Volume
Collective reduction
from all Shortage
Level 1 actions is up
to 252 AF
Yes
1 CII - Other CII restriction or
prohibition Volume
Collective reduction
from all Shortage
Level 1 actions is up
to 252 AF
No installation of Single Pass Cooling Systems Yes
1 CII - Other CII restriction or
prohibition Volume
Collective reduction
from all Shortage
Level 1 actions is up
to 252 AF
No installation of Non-re-circulating water
systems in Car Wash and Laundry Systems Yes
1 CII - Commercial kitchens required
to use pre-rinse spray valves Volume
Collective reduction
from all Shortage
Level 1 actions is up
to 252 AF
Yes
1 CII - Other CII restriction or
prohibition Volume
Collective reduction
from all Shortage
Level 1 actions is up
to 252 AF
All Commercial Car Wash Systems must have
installed operational re-circulating water
systems
Yes
1 Landscape - Limit landscape
irrigation to specific days Volume
Collective reduction
from all Shortage
Level 1 actions is up
to 252 AF
During Nov-Mar, limited to three days per week
on a schedule established by the City Yes
1 Other - Customers must repair
leaks, breaks, and malfunctions in a
timely manner
Volume
Collective reduction
from all Shortage
Level 1 actions is up
to 252 AF
Must be repaired within 72 hours of notification
by the City Yes
2 Other Volume
Collective reduction
from all Shortage
Level 2 actions is up
to 504 AF
Includes all Stage 1 Actions Yes
3 Other Volume
Collective reduction
from all Shortage
Level 3 actions is up
to 756 AF
Includes all Stage 2 Actions Yes
3 Other - Customers must repair
leaks, breaks, and malfunctions in a
timely manner
Volume
Collective reduction
from all Shortage
Level 3 actions is up
to 756 AF
Must be repaired within 48 hours of notification
by the City Yes
3 Other water feature or swimming
pool restriction Volume
Collective reduction
from all Shortage
Level 3 actions is up
to 756 AF
Filling or refilling ornamental lakes or ponds is
prohibited except to sustain aquatic life Yes
3 Other water feature or swimming
pool restriction Volume
Collective reduction
from all Shortage
Level 3 actions is up
to 756 AF
Refilling of more than one foot and initial filling
of residential swimming pools or outdoor spas with potable water is prohibitedYes 4 Other Volume
Collective reduction
from all Shortage
Level 4 actions is up
to 1,007 AF
Includes all Stage 3 Actions Yes
5 Other Volume
Collective reduction
from all Shortage
Level 5 actions is up
to 1,259 AF
Includes all Stage 4 Actions Yes
5 Landscape - Prohibit all landscape
irrigation Volume
Collective reduction
from all Shortage
Level 5 actions is up
to 1,259 AF
Yes
5 Other - Customers must repair
leaks, breaks, and malfunctions in a
timely manner
Volume
Collective reduction
from all Shortage
Level 5 actions is up
to 1,259 AF
Must be repaired within 24 hours of notification
by City Yes
5 Other Volume
Collective reduction
from all Shortage
Level 5 actions is up
to 1,259 AF
No new potable water service Yes
5 CII - Other CII restriction or
prohibition Volume
Collective reduction
from all Shortage
Level 5 actions is up
to 1,259 AF
Limits on Building Permits Yes
5 Other Volume
Collective reduction
from all Shortage
Level 5 actions is up
to 1,259 AF
The City may discontinue service to customers who willfully violate provisions Yes 5 Other Volume
Collective reduction
from all Shortage
Level 5 actions is up
to 1,259 AF
No new annexations Yes
6 Other Volume
Collective reduction
from all Shortage
Level 6 actions is
greater than 1,259
AF
Includes all Stage 5 Actions Yes
Is the Supplier completing this table using the standard six levels? (yes/no) Submittal Table 8-3 Retail: Demand Reduction Actions Water Code Section 10632(a)(4)(B),(D), and (E) Add additional rows as needed
How much is this going to reduce the
shortage gap?
Shortage
Level
Demand Reduction Actions
Drop down list
These are the only categories that will
be accepted by the WUEdata online
submittal tool. Select those that apply.

Additional Explanation or Reference
(OPTIONAL)
NOTES:

Penalty, Charge,
or Other
Enforcement?
For Retail Suppliers
Only
Drop Down List
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.

City Name 60 Day Notice
Drop Down (yes/no)
Notice of Public
Hearing
Drop Down (yes/no)
San Jacinto Yes Yes
County Name
Drop Down List
60 Day Notice
Drop Down (yes/no)
Notice of Public
Hearing
Drop Down (yes/no)
Riverside County Yes Yes
Submittal Table 10-1 Retail: Notification to Cities and Counties
Water Code Section 10621(b) and 10642
Add additional rows as needed
Add additional rows as needed
NOTES:

CITY OF SAN JACINTO
2025 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN

APPENDIX B

COMPLETED PLAN CHECKLIST
Retail
(x = required)
Wholesale
(x = required
)
Order 2025 Guidebook Location Water Code Section Summary as Applies to UWMP Subject Relevant Submittal Table 2025 UWMP Location
x x 1 Chapter 1 10615 A plan shall describe and evaluate sources of supply, reasonable and practical efficient uses, reclamation and demand management activities. Introduction and overview n/a Chapter 1 Lay Description x x 1 Chapter 1 10630.5
Each plan shall include a simple description of the Supplier’s plan including water availability, future requirements, a strategy for meeting needs, and other pertinent information. Additionally, a Supplier may also choose to include a simple description at the beginning of each chapter.

Plan preparation n/a Beginning of each Chapter
x x 2.1 Section 2.1 10620(b) Every person that becomes a Supplier shall adopt UWMP within one year after it has become a Supplier. Plan preparation n/a Section 2.1 x n/a 2.5 Section 2.5 10644 Supplier shall report the Public Water Systems number, volume of delivered water, and number of connections that are included in this UWMP. Plan preparation 2-1 Sections 2.1 and 2.5 x x 2.5 Section 2.5 10644 Supplier shall report if this UWMP is an individual UWMP and whether the Supplier belongs to a regional UWMP or regional alliance. Plan preparation 2-2 Sections 2.2 and 2.5 x x 2.5 Section 2.5 10644 Supplier shall report whether the data is in fiscal or calendar years and the units of measure used for reporting water volumes. Plan preparation 2-3 Sections 2.3 and 2.5 x x 2.4 Section 2.4 10642
Provide supporting documentation that the Supplier has encouraged active involvement of diverse social, cultural, and economic elements of the population within the service area prior to and during the preparation of the plan and contingency plan.

Plan preparation n/a Section 2.4
x x 2.4 Section 2.4.2 10620(d)(3)
Coordinate the preparation of its plan with other appropriate agencies in the area, including other Suppliers that share a common source, water management agencies, and relevant public agencies, to the extent practicable.

Plan preparation n/a Section 2.4.2
x n/a 2.4 Section 2.4.1 10631(h) Retail Suppliers will include documentation that they have provided their Wholesale Supplier(s)—if any—with water use projections from that source. Plan preparation 2-4 R Sections 2.4.1 and 2.5 n/a x 2.4 Section 2.4.1 10631(h)
Wholesale Suppliers will provide their Suppliers with identification and quantification of the existing and planned sources of water available from the Wholesale Supplier to the Supplier during various water year types.

Plan preparation 2-4 W n/a
x x 3 Chapter 3.0 10631(a) Describe the Supplier service area. System description n/a Section 3.1 and 3.2 x x 3.3 Section 3.3 10631(a) Describe the climate of the Supplier’s service area. System description n/a Section 3.3 x x 3.4 Section 3.4.1 10631(a) Provide the current and projected service area populations for 2030, 2035, 2040, 2045 and optionally 2050. System description 3-1 Sections 3.4 and 3.6
x x 3.4 Section 3.4.2 10631(a) Describe other social, economic, and demographic factors affecting the Supplier’s water management planning. System description n/a Section 3.4.2
x x 3.5 Section 3.5 10631(a)
Describe the land uses within the service area… include the current and projected land uses within the existing or anticipated service area affecting the Supplier’s water management planning. Describe the land uses within the service area.

System description and
baselines n/a Section 3.5
x Optional 4.2 Sections 4.2.3 and 4.2.4 10631(d)(1) Quantify past, current, and projected water use, identifying the uses among water use sectors. System water use 4-1 and 4-2 Sections 4.2 and 4.4 x Optional 4.3 Section 4.3.1 10631(d)(3)(A) Report the distribution system water loss for each of the five years preceding the plan update. System water use 4-5 Sections 4.3 and 4.4 x n/a 4.3 Section 4.3.2 10631(d)(3)(C) Retail Suppliers shall provide data to show the distribution loss standards were met. System water use 4-6 Sections 4.3 and 4.4 x n/a 4.2 Section 4.2.5.4 10631.1(a) Include projected water use needed for lower income housing projected in the service area of the Supplier. System water use 4-3 Sections 4.2.5.5 and 4.4 x n/a 4.2 Section 4.2.5.3 10631(d)(4)(A) In projected water use, include estimates of water savings from adopted codes, plans, and other policies or laws. System water use 4-3 Section 4.2.5.3
x n/a 4.2 Section 4.2.5.3 10631(d)(4)(B) Provide citations of codes, standards, ordinances, or plans used to make water use projections. System water use 4-3 Sections 4.2.5.3 and 9.1 x n/a 4.2 Section 4.2.5.3 10631(d)(4)(B)(ii)
To the extent that a Supplier reports the information described in subparagraph (A), an urban water Supplier shall… Indicate the extent that the water use projections consider savings from codes, standards, ordinances, or transportation and land use plans. Water use projections that do not account for these water savings shall be noted of that fact.

System water use 4-3 Section 4.2.5.3
x x 4.2 Section 4.2.5.6 10635(b) Demands under climate change considerations must be included as part of the drought risk assessment. System water use n/a Section 4.2.5.6 n/a x 5.1 Section 5.1 10608.36 Wholesale Suppliers shall include an assessment of present and proposed future measures, programs, and policies to help their Retail Suppliers achieve targeted water use reductions. Baselines and targets n/a n/a x n/a 5.2 Section 5.2 10608.4
Retail Suppliers shall report on their compliance in meeting their water use targets. Reporting requirements will vary depending on whether the Supplier:
- Was considered an urban retail water supplier in 2020, - Met its 2020 target in 2020, or
- Was part of a merger or consolidation since 2020.

Chapter 5 Subsections 5.2.1, 5.2.2, and 5.2.3 address each of these situations.

Baselines and targets 5-1 Sections 5.2 and 5.3
x x 6.1 Section 6.1 10631(b)(2) When multiple sources of water supply are identified, describe the management of each supply in relationship to other identified supplies. System supplies n/a Sections 6.1 and 6.2 x x 6.1 Sections 6.1 and 6.2 10631(b)(1)
Provide a discussion of anticipated supply availability under a normal, single dry year, and a drought lasting five years, as well as more frequent and severe periods of drought, including changes in supply due to climate change.

System supplies n/a Sections 6.1, 6.2, 7.1, and 7.2
x x 6.2 Section 6.2.2 10631(b)(4)(C)
Indicate whether groundwater is an existing or planned source of water available to the Supplier. If groundwater is identified as an existing or planned source of water… (include) a detailed description and analysis of the location, amount and sufficiency of groundwater pumped by the Supplier for the past five years.

Water supplies and recycled
water 6-1 Sections 6.2.2 and 6.4
x x 6.2 Section 6.2.2 10631(b)(4)(A)
Indicate whether a groundwater sustainability plan or groundwater management plan has been adopted by the Supplier or if there is any other specific authorization for groundwater management. Include a copy of the plan or authorization.

System supplies n/a Section 6.2.2
x x 6.2 Section 6.2.2 10631(b)(4)(B) Describe the groundwater basin. System supplies n/a Section 6.2.2 x x 6.2 Section 6.2.2 10631(b)(4)(B) Indicate if the basin has been adjudicated and include a copy of the court order or decree and a description of the amount of water the Supplier has the legal right to pump. System supplies n/a Section 6.2.2 x x 6.2 Section 6.2.2 10631(b)(4)(B) For unadjudicated basins… (include) information as to whether DWR has identified the basin as a high- or medium-priority basin in the most current official departmental bulletin… Water supplies and recycled
water n/a Section 6.2.2
x x 6.2 Section 6.2.2 10631(b)(4)(B) For unadjudicated basins… describe efforts by the Supplier to coordinate with sustainability or groundwater agencies to achieve sustainable groundwater conditions.

Water supplies and recycled
water n/a Section 6.2.2
x x 6.2 Section 6.2.2. 10631(b)(4)(C)
If groundwater is identified as an existing or planned source of water… (include) a detailed description and analysis of the location, amount and sufficiency of groundwater pumped by the Supplier for the past five years.

System supplies n/a Section 6.2.2
x x 6.2 Section 6.2.2 10631(b)(4)(D) Provide a detailed description and analysis of the amount and location of groundwater that is projected to be pumped. System supplies 6-9 Section 6.2.2
x x 6.1 Section 6.1 10631(b) Identify and quantify the existing and planned sources of water available for 2025, 2030, 2035, 2040, 2045 and optionally 2050. System supplies 6-8 and 6-9 Section 6.4 x x 6.2 Section 6.2.7 10631(c) Describe the opportunities for exchanges or transfers of water on a short-term or long-term basis. System supplies n/a Section 6.2.7 x n/a 6.2 Section 6.2.5 10633(a) Describe the wastewater collection and treatment systems in the Supplier’s service area with quantified amount of collection and treatment and the disposal methods.

System supplies (recycled
water) 6-2 Sections 6.2.5 and 6.4
x x 6.2 Section 6.2.5 10633(b) Describe the quantity of treated wastewater that meets recycled water standards, is being discharged, and is otherwise available for use in a recycled water project.

System supplies (recycled
water) 6-3 Sections 6.2.5 and 6.4
x x 6.2 Section 6.2.5 10633(c) Describe the recycled water currently being used in the Supplier's service area. System supplies (recycled water) 6-4 Sections 6.2.5 and 6.4
x x 6.2 Section 6.2.5 10633(d) Describe and quantify the potential uses of recycled water and provide a determination of the technical and economic feasibility of those uses.

System supplies (recycled
water) 6-4 Sections 6.2.5 and 6.4
x x 6.2 Section 6.2.5 10633(e) Describe the projected use of recycled water within the Supplier's service area at the end of 5, 10, 15, and 20 years, and describe the actual use of recycled water in comparison to uses previously projected.

System supplies (recycled
water) 6-4 and 6-5 Sections 6.2.5 and 6.4
x x 6.2 Section 6.2.5 10633(f) Describe the actions that may be taken to encourage the use of recycled water and the projected results of these actions in terms of acre-feet of recycled water used per year.

System supplies (recycled
water) 6-6 Sections 6.2.5 and 6.4
x x 6.2 Section 6.2.5 10633(g) Provide a plan for optimizing the use of recycled water in the Supplier's service area. System supplies (recycled water) n/a Sections 6.2.5 and 6.4
x x 6.2 Section 6.2.6 10631(g) Describe desalinated water project opportunities for long-term supply. System supplies 6-7 Section 6.2.6 x x 6.2 Section 6.2.10 10631(f)
Describe the expected future water supply projects and programs that may be undertaken by the water Supplier to address water supply reliability in average, single-dry, and for a period of drought lasting five consecutive water years.

System supplies 6-7 Sections 6.2.10 and 6.4
x x 6.3 Section 6.3 and Appendix O 10631.2(a) The UWMP must include energy information, as stated in the code, that a Supplier can readily obtain. System suppliers, energy intensity
O-1A, O-1B, O-1C,
and O-2 Section 6.3
x 7.1 Section 7.1 10634 Provide information on the quality of existing sources of water available to the Supplier and the manner in which water quality affects water management strategies and supply reliability.

Water supply reliability
assessment n/a Section 7.2
x x 7.2 Section 7.2 10635(a)
Service Reliability Assessment: Assess the water supply reliability during normal, dry, and a drought lasting five consecutive water years by comparing the total water supply sources available to the Supplier with the total projected water use over the next 20 years.

Water supply reliability
assessment 7-2, 7-3, and 7-4 Sections 7.3 and 7.4
x x 7.2 Section 7.2.3 10620(f) Describe water management tools and options to maximize resources and minimize the need to import water from other regions.

Water supply reliability
assessment n/a Section 7.2.3
x x 7.3 Section 7.3 10635(b) Provide a drought risk assessment as part of information considered in developing the demand management measures and water supply projects.

Water supply reliability
assessment n/a Section 7.3
x x 7.3 Section 7.3 10635(b)(1) Include a description of the data, methodology, and basis for one or more supply shortage conditions that are necessary to conduct a drought risk assessment for a drought period that lasts five consecutive years.

Water supply reliability
assessment n/a Section 7.3
x x 7.3 Section 7.3 10635(b)(2) Include a determination of the reliability of each source of supply under a variety of water shortage conditions.

Water supply reliability
assessment n/a Section 7.3
x x 7.3 Section 7.3 10635(b)(3) Include a comparison of the total water supply sources available to the Supplier with the total projected water use for the drought period.

Water supply reliability
assessment 7-5 Section 7.3
x x 7.3 Section 7.3 10635(b)(4)
Include considerations of the historical drought hydrology, plausible changes on projected supplies and demands under climate change conditions, anticipated regulatory changes, and other locally applicable criteria.

Water supply reliability
assessment n/a Section 7.3
x x 8 Chapter 8 10632(a) Provide a water shortage contingency plan (WSCP) with specified elements below. Water shortage contingency planning n/a Chapter 8
x x 8 Chapter 8 10632(a)(1) Provide an analysis of water supply reliability (from Guidebook Chapter 7) in the WSCP. Water shortage contingency planning n/a Chapter 8
x x 8.2 Section 8.2 10632(a)(2)(A) Provide the written decision-making process and other methods that the Supplier will use each year to determine its water reliability.

Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Section 8.2
x x 8.2 Section 8.2 10632(a)(2)(B) Provide data and methodology to evaluate the Supplier’s water reliability for the current year and one dry year pursuant to factors in the code.

Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Section 8.2
x x 8.3 Section 8.3 10632(a)(3)(A)
Define six standard water shortage levels of 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50% shortage, and greater than 50% shortage. These levels shall be based on supply conditions, including percent reductions in supply, changes in groundwater levels, changes in surface elevation, or other conditions. The shortage levels shall also apply to a catastrophic interruption of supply.

Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Section 8.3
x x 8.3 Section 8.3 10632(a)(3)(B) Suppliers with an existing WSCP that uses different water shortage levels must cross reference their categories with the six standard categories.

Water shortage contingency
planning 8-1 Sections 8.3 and 8.14
x x 8.4 Section 8.4 10632(a)(4)(A) Suppliers with WSCPs that align with the defined shortage levels must specify locally appropriate supply augmentation actions.

Water shortage contingency
planning 8-2 Sections 8.4.1 and 8.14
x x 8.4 Section 8.4 10632(a)(4)(B) Specify locally appropriate demand reduction actions to adequately respond to shortages. Water shortage contingency planning 8-3 Sections 8.4.2 and 8.14
x x 8.4 Section 8.4 10632(a)(4)(C) Specify locally appropriate operational changes. Water shortage contingency planning 8-2 Section 8.4.3
x x 8.4 Section 8.4 10632(a)(4)(D) Specify additional mandatory prohibitions against specific water use practices that are in addition to Statemandated prohibitions are appropriate to local conditions.

Water shortage contingency
planning Table 8-3 Section 8.4.4
x x 8.4 Section 8.4 10632(a)(4)(E) Estimate the extent to which the gap between supplies and demand will be reduced by implementation of the action.

Water shortage contingency
planning 8-2 and 8-3 Sections 8.4.7 and 8.14
x x 8.4 Section 8.4.6 10632.5 The UWMP shall include a seismic risk assessment and mitigation plan. Water shortage contingency plan n/a Section 8.4.6
x x 8.5 Section 8.5 10632(a)(5)(A) Suppliers must describe that they will inform customers, the public and others regarding any current or predicted water shortages.

Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Section 8.5
x x 8.5 Section 8.5 10632(a)(5)(B),
10632(a)(5)(C)
Suppliers must describe that they will inform customers, the public and others regarding any shortage response actions triggered or anticipated to be triggered and other relevant communications.

Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Section 8.5
x n/a 8.6 Section 8.6 10632(a)(6) Retail Supplier must describe how it will ensure compliance with and enforce provisions of the WSCP. Water shortage contingency planning n/a Section 8.6
x x 8.7 Section 8.7 10632(a)(7)(A) Describe the legal authority that empowers the Supplier to enforce shortage response actions. Water shortage contingency planning n/a Section 8.7
x x 8.7 Section 8.7 10632(a)(7)(B) Provide a statement that the Supplier will declare a water shortage emergency per Water Code Chapter 3. Water Shortage Emergencies .

Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Section 8.7
x x 8.7 Section 8.7 10632(a)(7)(C) Provide a statement that the Supplier will coordinate with any city or county within which it provides water for the possible proclamation of a local emergency.

Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Section 8.7
x x 8.8 Section 8.8 10632(a)(8)(A) Describe the potential revenue reductions and expense increases associated with activated shortage response actions.

Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Section 8.8
x x 8.8 Section 8.8 10632(a)(8)(B) Provide a description of mitigation actions needed to address revenue reductions and expense increases associated with activated shortage response actions.

Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Section 8.8
x n/a 8.8 Section 8.8 10632(a)(8)(C) Retail Suppliers must describe the cost of compliance with Water Code Chapter 3.3, Excessive Residential Water Use During Drought.

Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Section 8.8
x n/a 8.9 Section 8.9 10632(a)(9) Retail Suppliers must describe the monitoring and reporting requirements and procedures that ensure appropriate data are collected, tracked, and analyzed for purposes of monitoring customer compliance.

Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Section 8.9
x x 8.10 Section 8.10 10632(a)(10) Describe reevaluation and improvement procedures for monitoring and evaluation the WSCP to ensure risk tolerance is adequate and appropriate water shortage mitigation strategies are implemented.

Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Section 8.10
x n/a 8.11 Section 8.11 10632(b) Analyze and define water features that are artificially supplied with water, including ponds, lakes, waterfalls, and fountains, separately from swimming pools and spas.

Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Section 8.11
x x 8.12 Section 8.12 10632(c) Make available the WSCP to customers and any city or county where it provides water within 30 days after adoption of the plan.

Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Sections 8.12 and 10.6
x n/a 9.1 Sections 9.1 10631(e)(1)
Retail Suppliers shall provide a description of the nature and extent of each demand management measure implemented over the past five years. The description will address specific measures listed in code.

Demand management
measures
n/a Section 9.1.1
n/a x 9.2 Sections 9.2 10631(e)(2) Wholesale Suppliers shall describe specific demand management measures listed in code, their distribution system asset management program, and Supplier assistance program.

Demand management
measures
n/a n/a
x n/a 10 Chapter 10 10608.26(a) Retail Suppliers shall conduct a public hearing to discuss adoption, implementation, and economic impact of water use targets (recommended to discuss compliance).

Plan adoption, submittal, and
implementation n/a Sections 10.3 and 10.4
x x 10.2 Section 10.2.1 10621(b) Notify, at least 60 days prior to the public hearing, any city or county within which the Supplier provides water that the Supplier will be reviewing the UWMP and considering amendments or changes to the plan.

Plan adoption, submittal, and
implementation 10-1 Section 10.2
x x 10.4 Section 10.4 10621(f) Each urban water Supplier shall update and submit its 2025 plan to DWR by July 1, 202 6. Plan adoption, submittal, and implementation n/a Section 10.5
x x 10.2 Sections 10.2.2, 10.3, and

10.5 10642 Provide supporting documentation that the Supplier made the UWMP and WSCP available for public inspection, published notice of the public hearing, and held a public hearing about the UWMP and WSCP.

Plan adoption, submittal, and
implementation n/a Sections 10.2, 10.3, and 10.4
x x 10.2 Section 10.2.2 10642 The Supplier is to provide the time and place of the hearing to any city or county within which the Supplier provides water.

Plan adoption, submittal, and
implementation 10-1 Section 10.3
x x 10.3 Section 10.3.2 10642 Provide supporting documentation that the UWMP and WSCP has been adopted as prepared or modified. Plan adoption, submittal, and implementation n/a Sections 10.4 and 10.9
x x 10.4 Section 10.4 10644(a) Provide supporting documentation that the Supplier has submitted their UWMP to the California State Library.

Plan adoption, submittal, and
implementation n/a Section 10.5.3
x x 10.4 Section 10.4 10644(a)(1) Provide supporting documentation that the Supplier has submitted their UWMP to any city or county within which the Supplier provides water no later than 30 days after adoption.

Plan adoption, submittal, and
implementation n/a Section 10.5.4
x x 10.4 Sections 10.4.1 and 10.4.2 10644(a)(2) The UWMP, or amendments to the UWMP, submitted to DWR shall be submitted electronically. Plan adoption, submittal, and implementation n/a Sections 10.5 and 10.9
x x 10.7 Section 10.7.2 10644(b) If revised, submit a copy of the WSCP to DWR within 30 days of adoption. Plan adoption, submittal, and implementation n/a Section 10.9
x x 10.5 Section 10.5 10645(a) Provide supporting documentation that, not later than 30 days after filing a copy of its UWMP with DWR, the Supplier has or will make the plan available for public review during normal business hours.

Plan adoption, submittal, and
implementation n/a Section 10.6
x x 10.5 Section 10.5 10645(b) Provide supporting documentation that, not later than 30 days after filing a copy of its WSCP with DWR, the Supplier has or will make the plan available for public review during normal business hours.

Plan adoption, submittal, and
implementation n/a Section 10.6
x x 10.6 Section 10.6 10621(c) If Supplier is regulated by the Public Utilities Commission, include its plan and contingency plan as part of its general rate case filings.

Plan adoption, submittal, and
implementation n/a Section 10.7

CITY OF SAN JACINTO
2025 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN

APPENDIX C

DEMONSTRATION OF REDUCED IMPORTED WATER

RELIANCE

DEMONSTRATION OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE DELTA PLAN FOR

PARTICIPANTS IN COVERED ACTIONS
(2015 THROUGH 2050)

CITY OF SAN JACINTO
Introduction
Pursuant to the California Department of Water Resources (DWR), an urban water supplier that anticipates participating in or receiving water from a proposed project (or “covered action”) such as a multi-year water transfer, conveyance facility, or new diversion that involves transferring water through, exporting water from, or using water in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (Delta) should provide information in their 2015, 2020, and 2025 Urban Water Management Plans (UWMPs) for use in demonstrating consistency with Delta Plan Policy WR P1, “Reduce Reliance on the Delta Through Improved Regional Water Self-Reliance”. In addition, pursuant to California Code of Regulations, Title 23, § 5003:
(c)(1) Water suppliers that have done all of the following are contributing to reduced reliance on the Delta and improved regional self-reliance and are therefore consistent with this policy:
(A) Completed a current Urban or Agricultural Water Management Plan (Plan) which has been reviewed by the California Department of Water Resources for compliance with the applicable requirements of Water Code Division 6, Parts 2.55,

2.6, and 2.8;
(B) Identified, evaluated, and commenced implementation, consistent with the implementation schedule set forth in the Plan, of all programs and projects included in the Plan that are locally cost effective and technically feasible which reduce reliance on the Delta; and
(C) Included in the Plan, commencing in 2015, the expected outcome for measurable reduction in Delta reliance and improvement in regional self-reliance.

The expected outcome for measurable reduction in Delta reliance and improvement in regional self-reliance shall be reported in the Plan as the reduction in the amount of water used, or in the percentage of water used, from the Delta watershed. For the purposes of reporting, water efficiency is considered a new source of water supply, consistent with Water Code section 1011(a).

The City of San Jacinto (City) produces groundwater from the San Jacinto Basin. The City can also purchase treated groundwater supplies from Eastern Municipal Water District, which is a member agency of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD). EMWD’s water supplies consist of groundwater and imported water (a majority of which is supplied from the Colorado River Aqueduct). The City purchases treated groundwater from EMWD on an emergency basis to supplement City groundwater production and for preventative maintenance. The City's projected purchases of treated groundwater from EMWD are not anticipated to be a significant source of water supply.

Overall, the City is not anticipated to rely on imported water supplies from the Delta.

Reduced Reliance Calculation Tables
Pursuant to DWR guidance, Tables C-1 through C-4 were prepared to show the potential reduction of reliance on imported water supplies for the City. The City has used these tables to demonstrate its reduced regional reliance on imported water supplies, but not specifically Delta Watershed supplies. For each of the tables, a “Baseline year” was selected. Water demands during subsequent years (from 2015 through 2050 in five-year increments) were compared to water demands during the Baseline year. Table C-1 considers the population and service area water demands, and a demand in gallons per capita per day (GPCD) water use rate was calculated for each of the years following the Baseline year. The calculated reduction in GPCD from the Baseline year was then translated to an estimated amount of water saved as a result of water conservation measures. Table C-2 references the estimated amount of water saved from Table C-1 and shows the City’s water demand without water use efficiency in effect.

A method of showing reduced regional reliance on imported water supplies is to show increased regional self-reliance. Table C-3 lists water supply sources that contribute to regional self-reliance, including water use efficiency (from Table C-1 and C-2) and groundwater recharge activities. Regional self-reliance is expressed both in terms of acre feet (AF) and as a percentage.

The calculation of reduced regional reliance on imported water supplies is shown on Table C-4. Table C-4 also shows the percent change in imported water supplies relative to the City’s total supply. A negative percent change of imported water supplies indicates the City has reduced regional reliance on imported water supplies.

Since the Baseline year, the City has decreased its reliance on imported water supplies in 2015, 2020, 2025 and anticipates doing so through 2050.

The City has reduced regional reliance on imported water supplies as follows:
 The demand in GPCD for the "Baseline year" was compared to the GPCDs in subsequent years (from 2015 through 2050, in five-year increments). The reduced GPCD multiplied by the population in these subsequent years is indicative of the potential reduced regional reliance on imported water supplies and is included in Table C-1.

Reduced regional reliance on imported water supplies is discussed below. The sum of the increased regional self-reliance and the sum of the reduced regional reliance on imported water demand resulting from these categories is reflected on Table C-3 and Table C-4, respectively, and is reflective of the City’s overall reduced reliance.

Reduced GPCD
Section 6.2.2 of the City’s 2025 UWMP describes the management of the San Jacinto Basin. The City primarily relies on groundwater produced from the San Jacinto Basin, which is adjudicated and managed by the Hemet - San Jacinto Watermaster. The City can also purchase treated groundwater from Eastern Municipal Water District.

Chapter 9 of the 2025 UWMP describes the Demand Management Measures which the City has implemented to reduce the amount water used by its customers. In addition, Chapter 6 of the 2025 UWMP describes the groundwater basin management measures implemented by the Hemet – San Jacinto Watermaster. Collectively these actions translate to a reduction in the GPCD usage rate which is described further in Chapter 5 of the 2025 UWMP.

Pursuant to DWR guidance, reduced reliance on imported water supplies can be demonstrated by first selecting a “Baseline” water demand, represented by total potable water demands during 2010. Table C-1 summarizes the “Baseline” water usage by the City in 2010 (assuming demand reduction efforts had not been implemented); actual water usage in 2015, 2020, and 2025; and projected water usage through 2050 in fiveyear increments. Table C-2 demonstrates that if water conservation measures had not been implemented by the City, there may have been a greater reliance on imported water supplies during subsequent years as compared to the Baseline year. However, as discussed below and shown in Table C-1, the reduced water demands have resulted in reduced regional reliance on imported water supplies as compared to the Baseline year.

The City’s potable water demand during 2010, along with the corresponding service area population, were used to determine the Baseline GPCD. Subsequently, the actual demands for 2015, 2020, and 2025 were compared to the calculated population to obtain the recent GPCD which includes the water conservations measures which have been implemented (those demand management measures are described in Chapter 9 of the 2025 UWMP). The “Water Supplies Contributing to Regional Self-Reliance" are also provided in Table C-3. The differences between the Baseline GPCD and the 2015, 2020, and 2025 GPCDs are effectively considered a demonstration of the reduced regional reliance on imported water supplies with the understanding that any potential increased demand by the City resulting from increased population could have been required from imported water supplies, absent the City’s new water supplies which contribute to selfreliance. A similar methodology is used for the projected potable water demands (2025 UWMP Table 4-2) and populations (2025 UWMP Table 3-1).

The decrease in GPCD compared to the Baseline year has resulted in an overall decrease in reliance on water supplies from imported water supplies. As shown in Table C-4, the percentage of water supplies from imported water supplies relative to the City’s total supply has decreased, and is projected to decrease, from the percentage in the Baseline year.

Recycled Water for Groundwater Replenishment
EMWD is currently reviewing potential for implementing an advanced water purification facility, or the Purified Water Replenishment project. The proposed Purified Water Replenishment project will treat recycled water through a multi-stage process of microfiltration and reverse osmosis. The purified water could then be blended with additional treated water before being pumped into recharge basins located predominantly in the City of San Jacinto area. Replenished water would go through a natural physical and biological purification process for at least six months. The proposed Purified Water Replenishment project, when constructed, will further reduce regional reliance on imported water supplies.

Table C-1: Optional Calculation of Water Use Efficiency -To be completed if Water Supplier does not specifically estimate Water Use Efficiency as a supply Service Area Water Use Efficiency Demands
(Acre-Feet)
Baseline
(2010) 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
(Optional)
Service Area Water Demands with Water Use Efficiency Accounted For 2,270 2,795 2,650 2,448 2,692 2,841 2,964 3,092 3,225 Non-Potable Water Demands
Potable Service Area Demands with Water Use Efficiency Accounted For 2,795 2,270 2,650 2,448 2,692 2,841 2,964 3,092 3,225 Total Service Area Population Baseline
(2010) 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
(Optional)
Service Area Population 17,961 17,113 20,938 21,675 22,879 23,866 24,896 25,970 25,970 Water Use Efficiency Since Baseline
(Acre-Feet)
Baseline
(2010) 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
(Optional)
Per Capita Water Use (GPCD) 113 146 113 101 105 106 106 106 111 Change in Per Capita Water Use from Baseline (GPCD) (33) (33) (45) (41) (40) (40) (40) (35) Estimated Water Use Efficiency Since Baseline 770 663 1,092 1,045 1,057 1,102 1,150 1,017 Table C-2: Calculation of Service Area Water Demands Without Water Use Efficiency Total Service Area Water Demands
(Acre-Feet)
Baseline
(2010) 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
(Optional)
Service Area Water Demands with Water Use Efficiency Accounted For 2,270 2,795 2,650 2,448 2,692 2,841 2,964 3,092 3,225 Reported Water Use Efficiency or Estimated Water Use Efficiency Since Baseline 770 663 1,092 1,045 1,057 1,102 1,150 1,017 Service Area Water Demands without Water Use Efficiency Accounted For 2,795 2,934 3,420 3,540 3,737 3,898 4,066 4,242 4,242 Table C-3: Calculation of Supplies Contributing to Regional Self-Reliance Water Supplies Contributing to Regional Self-Reliance
(Acre-Feet)
Baseline
(2010) 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
(Optional)
Water Use Efficiency 663 - 770 1,092 1,045 1,057 1,102 1,150 1,017 Water Recycling
Stormwater Capture and Use
Advanced Water Technologies
Conjunctive Use Projects
Local and Regional Water Supply and Storage Projects
Other Programs and Projects the Contribute to Regional Self-Reliance Water Supplies Contributing to Regional Self-Reliance - 663 770 1,092 1,045 1,057 1,102 1,150 1,017 Service Area Water Demands without Water Use Efficiency (Acre-Feet)
Baseline
(2010) 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
(Optional)
Service Area Water Demands without Water Use Efficiency Accounted For 2,795 2,934 3,420 3,540 3,737 3,898 4,066 4,242 4,242 Change in Regional Self Reliance
(Acre-Feet)
Baseline
(2010) 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
(Optional)
Water Supplies Contributing to Regional Self-Reliance - 663 770 1,092 1,045 1,057 1,102 1,150 1,017 Change in Water Supplies Contributing to Regional Self-Reliance 663 770 1,092 1,045 1,057 1,102 1,150 1,017 Percent Change in Regional Self Reliance
(As Percent of Demand w/out WUE)
Baseline
(2010) 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
(Optional)
Percent of Water Supplies Contributing to Regional Self-Reliance 0.0% 22.6% 22.5% 30.8% 28.0% 27.1% 27.1% 27.1% 24.0% Change in Percent of Water Supplies Contributing to Regional Self-Reliance 22.6% 22.5% 30.8% 28.0% 27.1% 27.1% 27.1% 24.0% Table C-4: Calculation of Reliance on Water Supplies from the Delta Watershed Water Supplies from the Delta Watershed
(Acre-Feet)
Baseline
(2010) 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
(Optional)
CVP/SWP Contract Supplies
Delta/Delta Tributary Diversions
Transfers and Exchanges
Other Water Supplies from the Delta Watershed1 - - - - - - - - - Total Water Supplies from the Delta Watershed - - - - - - - - - Service Area Water Demands without Water Use Efficiency (Acre-Feet)
Baseline
(2010) 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
(Optional)
Service Area Water Demands without Water Use Efficiency Accounted For 2,795 2,934 3,420 3,540 3,737 3,898 4,066 4,242 4,242 Change in Supplies from the Delta Watershed
(Acre-Feet)
Baseline
(2010) 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
(Optional)
Water Supplies from the Delta Watershed - - - - - - - - - Change in Water Supplies from the Delta Watershed - - - - - - - - Percent Change in Supplies from the Delta Watershed
(As a Percent of Demand w/out WUE)
Baseline
(2010) 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
(Optional)
Percent of Water Supplies from the Delta Watershed 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Change in Percent of Water Supplies from the Delta Watershed 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1 Annual production greater than the City’s adjusted Production Right will be addressed through an assessment for the purchase of imported water from EMWD for groundwater replenishment. The City is projected to exceed its adjusted Production Right slighty. Imported water for replnishment purposes from EMWD is primarily from the Colorado River Aqueduct.

CITY OF SAN JACINTO
2025 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN

APPENDIX D

NOTIFICATION LETTERS AND NOTICES OF PUBLIC

HEARING

CITY OF SAN JACINTO
2025 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN

APPENDIX E

CLIMATE CHANGE CONSIDERATIONS (CAL- ADAPT
DATA)
Annual Averages https://cmip5.cal-adapt.org/tools/annual-averages 1 of 5 3/30/2026, 2:05 PM
Annual Averages https://cmip5.cal-adapt.org/tools/annual-averages 2 of 5 3/30/2026, 2:05 PM
Annual Averages https://cmip5.cal-adapt.org/tools/annual-averages 3 of 5 3/30/2026, 2:05 PM

Annual Averages https://cmip5.cal-adapt.org/tools/annual-averages 5 of 5 3/30/2026, 2:05 PM
Annual Averages https://cmip5.cal-adapt.org/tools/annual-averages 1 of 5 3/30/2026, 2:04 PM
Annual Averages https://cmip5.cal-adapt.org/tools/annual-averages 2 of 5 3/30/2026, 2:04 PM
Annual Averages https://cmip5.cal-adapt.org/tools/annual-averages 3 of 5 3/30/2026, 2:04 PM

Annual Averages https://cmip5.cal-adapt.org/tools/annual-averages 5 of 5 3/30/2026, 2:04 PM

CITY OF SAN JACINTO
2025 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN

APPENDIX F

GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
(NOVEMBER 2007)

CITY OF SAN JACINTO
2025 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN

APPENDIX G

SAN JACINTO BASIN JUDGMENT
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
GERALD D. SHOAF, SBN 41084
RED~EANDSHEruliLL
1950 MARKET ST.

RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
(951) 684-2520 .

Fax (951) 684-9583
[email protected]
Attorneys for Plaintiff

EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
EASTERN :MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, ) CASE NO.:

A California Municipal Water District, )
) STIPULATED JUDGMENT
Plain tift; )
VS. )
)
CITY OF HEMET; )
CITY OF SAN JACINTO; )

LAKE HEMET MUNICIPAL WATER )
DISTRICT; )
DOES 1 through 1,000, inclusive, )

FINDINGS

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. )
Defendants. )

TABLE OF CONTENTS
--- ---------- ----------------- --------------- --------------- Complaint ------ ------------------------------------------------ Parties ----------- ----- - --------------------------------- A. Eastern------------------------------------------------------------- B. Lake Hemet ---------------------------------------------------- C. Hemet --------------------------------------
D. San Jacinto ----------------------------------------- E. Pumpers ------------ -------- --- -------------------------- Answers and Stipulation for Judgment ------------------------ Sole Producers ---------------------------------
Importance of Surface Water and Groundwater ----------- Stipulated Judgment
-1-
5 5
5 5
5 5
6 6
6 6
6 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 6.

7. 8.

1. )
Overdraft ------------------------------------------
Importance of Judgment ----------------------------------- Jurisdiction --------------------------------------------

JUDGMENT

DEFINITIONS ----------------------------------------------

1.1 Adjusted Production Right -------------------------------

1.2 Administrative Assessment -------------------------------

1.3 Administrative Expenses -----------------

1.4 Advisor ----- --------- ------ --------------~-

1.5 Annual Basin Yield ------------------------------------

1.6 Base Production Right ---------------------------

1.7 Carry-Over Credit ------------------------------ 1.8 Class A Participant --------------------------------

1.9 Class B Participant ------------------------------

1.10 Fiscal Year --------,..--------------------------------

1.11 Fruitvale Documents -------------------------------------

1.12 1.13

1.14 1.15

1.16 1.17

1.18 1.19

1.20 1.21

1.22 1.23

1.24 1.25

1.26 1.27

1.28 1.29

1.30 1.31

1.32 1.33

1.34 (a) Fruitvale Judgment ------------------------------- (b) Fruitvale Mutual Water Company
Sale of Assets ------------------------------------
(c) Fruitvale Mutual Water Company
Agency Agreements --------------------------
Groundwater -------------------------------------
Groundwater Degradation
Imported Water
In-Lieu Water
Management Area -------------------------------
Metropolitan -------------------------------------
Natural Recharge ------------------------------
New Pumper -------------------------------------
Non-Participant ---------------------------
Overdraft ---------------------------------
Overlying Right --------------------~----
Party or Parties -------------------------------------
Person ------------------------------------------------- Physical Solution ----------------------------------
Private Pumper --------------------------------
Public Agency or Agencies ----------------------------
Recharge or Replenish -----------------------
Recharge Right ------------------------------------
Recycled Water -----------------------------------
Replenishment Assessment -------------------------
Replenishment Expenses -----------------------
Safe Yield --------------------------------------
Settlement Agreement------------------------------------------- Stipulated Judgment
-2-
6 6
6 7
7 7
7 7
7 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 9
9 9
9 9
9 9
9 9
9 10
10 10
10 10
10 10
10 10
11 11
11 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 2.
9 10
11 12 3.
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20 4.
21 22
23 24
25 5.
26 27
28 1.35 Soboba Tribe ------------------------------------------------

1.36 Soboba Action---------------------------------------------------

1. 3 7 Storage Agreement ------------·-------------------

1.3 8 Storage Right ---------------------------- ------------------

1.39 Stored Water -----------------
---------------------------------

1.40 Supplemental Water -------------------------·----·--------

1.41 Surface Water ----------------------
-----------------

1.~2 1lrallSfer ------------------------------------------- 1.43 Tribal Water Rights -------------------------------------------

1.44 Tunnel -------------------------------------------

1.45 Watennaster --------------------------------------

1.46 Water Management Plan --------------------- -----------

EXHIDITS ---------------------------------------------------- "A" - Management Area and
Management Area Watershed ------------------------
"B" - Parties to this Judgment ------------------------ "C" - Description of each Public Agency's and
Class B Participant's Base Production Right ----------------

PUBLIC AGENCIES' WATERRIGHTS --
---------

3.1 Base Production Right-------------------------------------------

3.1.1 Eastern --------
---------------------------

3.1.2 Lake Hemet -----------------------------

3.1.3 Hemet -------------------------------------

3.1.4 San Jacinto --------------------------------

3.1.5 Adjustments ----------------------------

3.2 Adjusted Production Rights ------------------------------

3.3 Allocation ofUnused Imported Water-------------
------------

3.4 Public Agency Production Assessments ----------

3.5 Surface Rights----------------------------------------------------

3.6 Fruitvale Judgment, Sale of Assets, and Agreements-------

3. 7 Fruitvale Agency Rights -------------------------------

PRIVATE PUMPERS' WATER RIGHTS ------------------

4.1 Recognition ofRights -----------------------------------

4.2 Non-Participation ---------------------------

4.3 Class A Participation -----------------------------------

4.4 Class B Participation ----------
---- ------------

4.5 In-Lieu Water Use ---------------

4.6 Future Production Participation ------------------------

4.7 Replacement Wells -----------------------------
---

TRIBAL WATER RIGHTS -------------------------------------------

5.1 Senior Right -------------------------------

5.2 Metropolitan Water ------------------------------

5.3 Settlement Payment -------------------------------

5.4 Capital Facilities ----------
----------·-------

5.5 Public Agencies' Use of Facilities --------------------

5.6 Acknowledgment ofSoboba Tribe Settlement
Stipulated Judgment
-3-
11 11
11 11
11 12
12 12
12 12
12 12
12 12
12 12
13 13
13 13
13 13
13 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
17 17
17 18
20 21
21 21
21 22
22 22
22 23
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

6. 7.

8. 9.

10. PHYSICAL SOLUTION --------
--------------------------

6.1 Purpose and Objective -------------------------------

6.2 Need for Flexibility ------------------------

6.3 Rights to Groundwater --------- -------------------

6.4 Resolution of Priorities -----------------------------

6.5 Water Management Plan -------------------

6.6 Replenishment Pro gram ---------------------------

6.7 Storage Right ------------------------------------

6.8 Recycled Water ---------------------------------

6.9 Assessment Program --
------------------------------

6.10 Export ----------------·--------------------------- -------

6.11 Capital Facilities --,- ------------------------------ INJUNCTION ------------------------·----------------

CONTINUING JURI SD I CTI ON---------------------------------------

8.1 Full Jurisdiction --------------------------------------

8.2 Motion to Interpret -------------------------------------------

W ATERMAS TER ----------------------------------------------------

9.1 Composition ----------------------------------------------------

9.2 Terms ----
--------------·-----------·------------

9.3 Removal and Replacement -----------------------------

9.4 Voting -------------------------------------------------------------

9.5 Court Review -------
·-----------------------------------------

9.6 Powers and Duties ------
-----------------------------

9.6.1 Water Management Plan ----------------------

9.6.2 Independent Counsel ----------------------------

9.6.3 Advisor ---------------------------------

9.6.4 Operations and Other Functions-----------------------

9.6.4.1 Operations- Phase I Facilities ----------

9.6.4.2 Operations- Other Facilities -----------

9.6.4.3 Purchase ofWater for
Groundwater Recharge ----------

9.6.4.4 Data Collection ----------------------

9.6.4.5 Accounting --------------------------------

9.6.4.5.1 Financial Accounting---------------

9.6.4.5.2 Water Use, Storage and
Transfers-----------------------

9.6.5 Technical Advisory Committee -------------------------

9.6.6 Reservation ofRights ---------
--------------------

9.6.7 Rules and Regulations-----------------------------------

9.6.8 Reports to Court --------------------
---

9.6.9 Notice to Parties ----
----------

9.7 Watermaster Records ------------------
:MISCELLANEOUS---------------------------------------·------ 1 0.1 Intervention After Judgment -----------------------------------

10.2 Loss of Rights -----------------------------------------------------

10.3 Attorney's Fees and Costs -------------
Stipulated Judgment
-4-
23 23
23 23
23 24
26 27
28 29
30 30
31 32
32 32
32 32
32 32
32 33
33 33
33 33
34 34
34 34
35 35
35 36
36 36
37 37
37 37
37 37
37 37
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

FINDINGS
After consideration of the pleadings and the Stipulation for Entry of Judgment, the Court finds that:

1. Complaint. On May 16, 2012, PlaintiffEastern Municipal Water District ("Eastern") filed a Complaint against Defendants Lake Hemet Municipal Water District (''Lake Hemet"), City of Hemet (''Hemet"), City of San Jacinto ("San Jacinto"), and DOES 1 through 1,000, inclusive. The Complaint requests a declaration ofPlainti:ffs and Defendants' individual and collective rights to Surface Water and Groundwater in the Canyon Subbasin, the San Jacinto Upper Pressure Subbasin downstream to Bridge Street, and the Hemet Basin ("Management Area") and the imposition of a Physical Solution to achieve the optimum, reasonable, beneficial use of the waters of the Management Area pursuant to section 2 of article X of the California Constitution. A map describing the boundaries of the Management Area is attached to this Judgment as Exhibit "A" and to the Complaint.

2. Parties.

A. Eastern. Eastern is a California municipal water district formed pursuant to the Municipal Water District Law, California Water Code Sections 71000-73001 (West 1966), with its principal place ofbusiness in Riverside County, California. Eastern diverts Surface Water from the San Jacinto River, and pumps Groundwater from the Management Area for use by its customers within its boundaries.

B. Lake Hemet. Lake Hemet is a California municipal water district formed pursuant to the Municipal Water District Law, California Water Code Sections 71000-73001 (West 1966), with its principal place ofbusiness in Riverside County, California. Lake Hemet diverts Surface Water from the Santa Jacinto River and its tributaries, and pumps Groundwater from the Management Area for use by its customers within its boundaries. c. Hemet. Hemet is a California municipal corporation providing utility services pursuant to the California Constitution, article XI, section 9. Hemet pumps Groundwater from the Management Area for use by its customers within its boundaries.

Stipulated Judgment
-5-
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24.
25 26
27 28
D. San Jacinto. San Jacinto is a California municipal corporation providing utility services pursuant to the California Constitution, article XI, section 9. San Jacinto pumps Groundwater from the Management Area for use by its customers within its boundaries.

E. Pumpers. Does 1 through 1,000, inclusive, are Persons or entities who own farms or other property within the Management Area, and pump Groundwater from the Management Area.

3. Answers and Stipulation for Judgment. All defendants have filed Answers, and all Parties have filed a Stipulation for Entry of Judgment.

4. Sole Producers. Other than the Soboba Band ofLuiseiio Indians, and certain overlying users not Parties to this litigation, the Parties claim essentially all of the rights to produce Surface Water and Groundwater in the Management Area.

5. Importance of Surface Water and Groundwater. Surface water and Groundwater from the Management Area are important water supplies for agriculture, domestic and municipal use. The Parties have a mutual and collective interest in the coordinated management of such water resources to ensure that the common resource is used efficiently and reasonably, and that it is sustained and replenished.

6. Overdraft. It is estimated that the Overdraft of the Management Area is approximately 10,000 acre-feet per year. This estimate will be refined through further studies to be completed pursuant to the Water Management Plan, including data on the several subbasins within the Management Area. Studies confirm that in recent years the total Groundwater production from the Management Area, including pumping by those Persons not Parties to this litigation, has averaged approximately 54,800 acre-feet per year.

7. Importance of Judgment. The Parties have an interest in the Physical Solution imposed by this Judgment to promote the efficient and coordinated management of Surface Water and Groundwater, to avoid problems from Overdraft, to assist in protecting the rights of the Soboba Band ofLuiseiio Indians, to sustain and enhance water resources, and to resolve competing claims to Surface Water and Groundwater.

8. Jurisdiction. This Court has jurisdiction to enter this Judgment declaring and Stipulated Judgment
-6-
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
)
adjudicating the rights of the Parties to the reasonable and beneficial use of Surface Water and Groundwater in the Management Area, and to impose a Physical Solution pursuant to law, including California Constitution, article X, section 2.

JUDGMENT
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:

1. DEFINITIONS.

1.1 Adjusted Production Right- the Base Production Right of each Public Agency, as adjusted pursuant to Sections 3.2 to 3.2.5.

1.2 Administrative Assessment- an acre-foot charge to be levied against each Public Agency for water pumped up to its Adjusted Production Right, including any unused amount of such Right that is pumped in a following year (Carry-Over Credit). Such assessments shall be used for Administrative Expenses, and for the purchase of Supplemental Water after Administrative Expenses have been paid. No Administrative Assessment shall be levied on a Party's pumping of its share oflmported, Supplemental, or Stored Water.

1.3 Administrative Expenses- Include, but are not limited to, Watermaster's expenses for office rental, personnel, supplies, office equipment, general overhead, preparing and collecting assessments, monitoring well pumping, measuring water levels, sampling and analyzing water quality, compiling and inte:rpreting collected data, conducting special studies, litigation, and such other expenses as are reasonable and necessary for the Watermaster to carry out its duties under the Physical Solution and Water Management Plan.

1.4 Advisor. An independent engineering firm or qualified individual as provided in Section 9.6.3.

1.5 Annual Basin Yield- the quantity of Groundwater that Watermaster determines the Parties may Produce from the Management Area in a calendar year without a replenishment obligation under the Physical Solution.

Stipulated Judgment
-7-
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

1.6 Base Production Right- a water right of a Public Agency or Class B Participant.

1.7 Carry-Over Credit- a Public Agency's or a Class B Participant's credit against the Replenishment Assessment in a Fiscal Year, based on the Agency's Adjusted or Base Production Right or share oflmported Water not produced in prior calendar years.

1.8 Class A Participant- a Private Pumper who stipulates to this Judgment and participates in the Water Management Plan as defined in Sections 4.3 to 4.3.5.

1.9 Class B Participant- a Private Pumper who stipulates to this Judgment and participates in the Water Management Plan as defined in Sections 4.4 to 4.4.6.

1.10 Fiscal Year- the period from July 1 through June 30 ofthe following calendar year.

1.11 Fruitvale Documents-
(a) Fruitvale Judgment- The Judgment and Decree entered in the Superior Court for the County ofRiverside on June 4, 1954, in an action titled The City of San Jacinto, et al. v. Fruitvale Mutual Water Company, et al , Case No. 51-546; (b) Fruitvale Mutual Water Company Sale of Assets to EasternThat certain "Agreement for the Sale of Assets of the Fruitvale Mutual Water Company to Eastern Municipal Water District" dated September 10, 1971 ("Purchase Agreement"); (c) Fruitvale Mutual Water Company Agency Agreements- The Agreement Between the City of San Jacinto and Eastern Municipal Water District dated November 2, 1971, the Agreement Between Lake Hemet Municipal Water District and Eastern Municipal Water District dated June 9, 1972, and the Agreement Between the City of Hemet and Eastern Municipal Water District dated June 13, 1972, all providing for recognition of ownership of stock in Fruitvale Mutual Water Company by the Cities and by Lake Hemet, and making provision for the continued sale of water produced through the Fruitvale facilities by Eastern to the Cities and to Lake Hemet.

1.12 Groundwater- all water within and beneath the ground surface ofthe Management Area.

Stipulated Judgment
-8-
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24

1.13 Groundwater Degradation (also "groundwater quality degradation" and ''water quality degradation," "Degradation" and "Degraded Groundwater")- Water contamination as defined in state and/or federal law, and other conditions of reduced water quality as determined by the Watermaster to be harmful or undesirable for the operation of the Management Area.

1.14 Imported Water- An average of7,500 acre feet annually of water sold by The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California to Eastern pursuant to Section 4.4 of the Soboba Band ofLuisefio Indians "Settlement Agreement."

1.15 In-Lieu Water- Groundwater that is not pumped, but which would have otherwise been pumped by the holder of an Overlying or Appropriative Right within the Management Area, by virtue of the pumper's agreement with an Agency or the Watermaster to receive and use Recycled Water or other nonpotable water in lieu of Groundwater.

1.16 Management Area -the Canyon, the San Jacinto Upper Pressure, and the Hemet North and Hemet South Basins, as delineated on the map attached as Exlnbit "A."

1.17 Metropolitan- The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California.

1.18 Natural Recharge- Groundwater replenishment within the Management Area occurring from precipitation o.n the surface, percolation from surface flows of the San Jacinto River and its tributaries, spreading or injection of such surface flows, return flows from irrigation, and subsurface inflows.

1.19 New Pumper- a Private Pumper who pumps for the first time after entry of Judgment herein.

1.20 Non-Participant- a Private Pumper who elects not to participate in the Management Plan, orto be a Party to this Judgment.

1.21 Overdraft- a condition whereby pumping in the Management Area 25 exceeds the Safe Yield thereof
26 27
28 1.22 Overlving Right - the appurtenant right of an owner ofland overlying the Management Area to pump water from such land for beneficial use thereon.

Stipulated Judgment
-9-
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 1.23 Party or Parties - Eastern, Lake Hemet, Hemet, San Jacinto and the othe Persons listed in the attached Exhibit "B."

1.24 Person- any individual, partnership, association, corporation, trust, government agency or other organization.

1.25 Physical Solution-the Court decreed method of managing the water supply of the Management Area to maximize the reasonable and beneficial use of the waters thereof pursuant to the California Constitution, article X, section 2, to eliminate Overdraft pursuant to the provisions ofthis Judgment, to protect the prior rights of the Soboba Tribe, and to provide for the substantial enjoyment of all water rights recognizing their priorities.

1.26 Private Pumper- a Person who owns land with an Overlying Right or other right in the Management Area and pumps more than 25 acre-feet per year. Private Pumper includes New Pumpers.

1.27 Public Agency or Agencies - Eastern, Lake Hemet, Hemet and San 14 Jacinto.
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

1.28 Recharge or Replenish- to sink, spread or inject water directly or indirectly underground in the Management Area

1.29 Recharge Right- the rights of Eastern and Lake Hemet to pump and use water previously replenished to the Management Area as provided in Section 6. 7 .4.

1.30 Recycled Water - treated wastewater which is processed and suitable for controlled use in the Management Area, including Recharge.

1.31 Replenishment Assessment- a charge to be levied against each Public Agency for each acre foot, or portion thereof, of Groundwater pumped in excess of the sum of its respective Adjusted Production Right, its share oflmported Water, Stored Water, Supplemental Water, and applicable Carry-Over Credits and Recharge Rights; and against each Class B Participant for pumping in excess of its 1995-99 average production, i.e., its Base Production Right. The rate of such assessments shall be determined by the Watermaster and shall be used for Replenishment Expenses.

Stipulated Judgment
-10-
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14

1.32 Replenishment Expenses- Watermaster expenses, including, but not limited to, the acquisition of Supplemental Water supplies, development ofln-Lieu Water projects, acquisition or improvement of land, and for the construction, maintenance and operation of facilities necessary to replenish Groundwater in the Management Area, or otherwise to provide water to Parties within the Management Area

1.33 Safe Yield- the long term, average quantity of water supply in the Management Area that can be pumped without causing undesirable results, including the gradual reduction of natural Groundwater in storage over long-term hydrologic cycles. The initial Safe Yield of the Management Area is estimated to be approximately 45,000 acre feet per year.

1.34 Settlement Agreement- that Agreement titled "The Soboba Band of Luiseiio Indians Settlement Agreement" among the Soboba Tribe, the United States, as Trustee for the Tribe, Eastern Municipal Water District, Lake Hemet Municipal Water District, and The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California.

1.35 Soboba Tribe (sometimes the "Tribe")-the Soboba Band ofLuiseiio 15 Indians.
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 1.36 Soboba Action- the lawsuit entitled Soboba Band of Mission Indians, etc., v. Metropolitan, etc., et al, U.S. District Court, Central District of California, Case No. 00-84208 GAF (MANx).

1.37 Storage Agreement- an agreement between Watermaster and a Party to store Supplemental Water (other than a Party's share ofimported Water) by sinking, spreading, injecting or in-lieu procedures in the Management Area, and to establish a manner of accounting for the credit therefore and subsequently to recover such water, without payment of Administrative or Replenishment Assessments.

1.38 Storage Right- a Party's right to store and pump Supplemental Water (not required for a Party's share oflmported Water) pursuant to a Storage Agreement.

1.39 Stored Water- Supplemental Water (other than a Party's share of Imported Water) stored by a Party pursuant to a Storage Agreement.

Stipulated Judgment
-11-
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14

1.40 Supplemental Water- nontributary water imported into the Management Area, including imported water (i.e., other than or in addition to Imported Water as defined in Section 1.14), Recycled Water, In-Lieu Water, and other nonpotable water.

1.41 Surface Water- all water tributary to the Management Area and flowing above the ground surface.

1.42 Transfer- a temporary or permanent authorized conveyance, assignment, sale, contract or lease of part or all of a Public Agency's Carry-Over Credit, Storage Right or Recharge Right to any other Party, or a temporary assignment, contract, lease or sale of a Public Agency's share ofimported Water.

1.43 Tribal Water Rights- the Soboba Tribe's rights to water set forth in Section 4.1 ofthe Settlement Agreement and Section 5 ofthis Stipulated Judgment.

1.44 Tunnel- the San Jacinto Tunnel in Riverside County, California, constructed by Metropolitan in the 1930s.

1.45 Watermaster-the Board with the powers and duties defined in Section 15 9.
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 1.46 Wa ter M anagement Plan (sometimes the "Plan")- the Plan adopted by the Watermaster, as it may be modified from time to time, to implement the Physical Solution, to ensure an adequate and reliable source of future water supply for the Management Area, and to protect the prior rights of the Soboba Tribe.

2. EXHffiiTS.

The following exhibits are attached to this Judgment and incorporated in it:
"A." Map of the Management Area and the Management Area Watershed. "B." List ofParties to this Judgment.
"C." Description of each Public Agency's and Class A and Class B Participant's Base Production Right.

Stipulated Judgment
-12-
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

3. PUBUC AGENCIES' WATER RIGHTS.

3.1 Base Production Right. The Public Agencies are owners of rights to pump Groundwater from the Management Area as set forth in Exhibit "C." These rights are for a calendar year and were calculated as follows:

3.1.1 Eastern. The Base Production Right ofEastern is based upon its respective average pumping for calendar years 1995-1999, less an adjustment of 1800 acre-feet representing a portion of a credit which it receives from Metropolitan for seepage into Metropolitan's San Jacinto Tunne~ for Eastern's use of Fruitvale water elsewhere, and for use of Fruitvale water by Lake Hemet, San Jacinto, and Hemet. The 1995-1999 period was chosen to reflect recent production prior to the commencement of negotiations leading to this Stipulated Judgment.

3.1.2 Lake Hemet. The Base Production Right of Lake Hemet is based on its average production for calendar years 1995-1999.

3.1.3 Hemet. The Base Production Right of Hemet is based on its average production for calendar years 1995-99, plus an adjustment of900 acre feet per year representing a portion ofthe seepage credit referenced in Section 3.1.1.

3.1.4 San Jacinto. The Base Production Right of San Jacinto is based upon its average Production for calendar years 1995-1999, plus 500 acre-feet per year, and plus an adjustment of900 acre feet per year representing a portion of the seepage credit referenced in Section 3 .1.1. The 500 acre-feet per year has been added because San Jacinto's recent pumping does not reflect its historic production, due to water purchases and other factors.

3.1.5 Adjustments. The Base Production Rights of Hemet and San Jacinto each include 900 acre-feet per year that have been added to their respective amounts of pumping for calendar years 1995-1999. These amounts have been added to provide Hemet and San Jacinto a fair share ofwater from, and to resolve disputes regarding, Eastern's use of tunnel seepage, Eastern's use of Fruitvale waters, and Lake Hemet's surface stream diversions. These additional amounts of900 acre-feet per year shall be treated as the first amounts pumped by Hemet and San Jacinto, shall not be subject to reduction by the Watennaster as provided in Stipulated Judgment
-13-
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
Sections 3.2 to 3.2.2, and shall not be subject to any Administrative or Replenishment Assessments as provided in Sections 3.4 to 3.4.2, or to any other fee or charge imposed under the Management Plan.

3.2 Adjusted Production Rights. It is the goal of the Physical Solution to adjust the Base Production Rights ofthe Public Agencies over time on a pro-rata basis to a level consistent with the Watermaster's determination of Safe Yield. The reduction will be based on periodic demand, hydrology, Recharge, and the community's ability to pay for Supplemental Water, and protection of the Tribal Water Rights. In order to implement this reduction in a phased manner, each Public Agency's Base Production Right shall be subject to adjustment as follows:

3.2.1 Subject to Section 3.1.5, a 10% reduction from each Base Production Right in the first full year after entry of this Judgment.

3.2.2 Until Adjusted Production Rights are consistent with the Public Agencies' share of Safe Yield, Watermaster shall determine the required reductions in Adjusted Production Rights in each subsequent year to achieve Safe Yield within a reasonable period of time as determined by the Watermaster, considering the extent of the Overdraft, the economic impact on the Parties bound by this Judgment, and other relevant factors. The goal is to achieve Safe Yield over a six (6) year period assuming an annual Overdraft oflO,OOO acre feet. In the event the extent of the Overdraft is greater or lesser than assumed, then the period oftime reasonably required to reach Safe Yield may be extended or reduced accordingly. However, in no event shall any reduction be more than 10% of the Adjusted Production Rights of the prior year.

3.2.3 A Public Agency Party may pump in excess ofits Adjusted Production Right, without any additional Administrative or Replenishment Assessment, by an amount equal to its share of the 7,500 acre feet per year oflmported Water that is not used by the Tribe provided such water has been previously delivered and is stored or will be delivered during the current water year. The amount of the Tribe's unused portion of the 7,500 acre feet shall be determined annually by the Watennaster. Shares of unused Imported Water shall be allotted to Stipulated Judgment
-14-
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 ·12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
)
the Public Agency Parties in proportion to Base Production Rights, and shall be acquired and paid for pursuant to contract with Eastern.
3 .2.4 A Base Production Right of a Public Agency serving the land of a Class B Participant shall be increase<I in an amount equal to such Participant's Base Production Right, adjusted and reduced pursuant to Sections 3.2.1 and 3.2.2, when the Participant's land is converted from agricultural use to water service from the Public Agency, pursuant to Section

4.4.3. 3.2.5 The Adjusted Production Rights of the Public Agencies may be increased by the W atermaster on a pro rata basis to the extent that pumping by Class A participants, or pumping by Persons not Parties to this Judgment, may decrease, and the Watermaster finds that achieving the goal of maintaining the Management Area in a Safe Yield condition can still be met.

3.3 Allocation of Unused Imported Water. A Public Agency's share of Imported Water that is not used by the Soboba Tribe, as described in Section 3.2.3 shall be subject to the following additional rules:

3.3.1 To the extent that a Public Agency does not use all of its share of the Imported Water, the unused portion may be stored for its account for future use or transfer by the Public Agency.

3.3.2 A Public Agency may lease, sell or otherwise transfer any portion of the Public Agency's stored Imported Water or of the then current year's share of the Imported Water to another Public Agency or to the Watermaster.

3.4 Public Agency Production Assessments. Public Agency pumping shall be subject to the following assessments:

3.4.1 An Administrative Assessment as provided in Section 1.2. The Administrative Assessment will be $50.00 per acre-foot of a Party's Adjusted Production Right pumped after entry ofthis Judgment. The Watermaster shall set the Administrative Assessment rate annually thereafter. The first 900 acre feet per year of Adjusted Production Right pumped Stipulated Judgment
-15-
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
)
by Hemet and San Jacinto and water pumped by a Public Agency pursuant to Section 3.4 above shall not be subject to such assessment.

3.4.2 A Replenishment Assessment will be levied on each Public Agency as provided in Section 1. 31. However, a Public Agency may pump Groundwater in excess ofthe sum of its Adjusted Production Right, its share oflmported Water, Supplemental Water applicable Carry-Over Credits per Section 6.9.2, Recharge Rights, and production of Stored Water, in order to meet increasing demands, provided that such excess extractions shall be subject to Replenishment Assessments.

3.5 Surface Rights. Eastern holds License Number 016667 from the State Water Resources Control Board to divert, spread and recover surface flows of the San Jacinto River within the Management Area. Lake Hemet holds pre-1914 appropriative rights to divert and store surface flows in Lake Hemet, and to divert surface flows tributary to but outside of the Management Area from Strawberry Creek and from the North and South Forks of the San Jacinto River. All Parties acknowledge such Eastern and Lake Hemet rights, and the fact that they are not subject to any assessments under this Judgment; provided that any water pumped by Eastern under its License shall be included in its Adjusted Production Right.

3.6 F ruitvale Judgment. Sale of Assets, and Agreements. The Court hereby finds that Eastern purchased all of the water rights and assets of the Fruitvale Mutual Water Company ("Fruitvale") pursuant to the Agreement described in Section 1.11(b) hereo±:
and is now the owner thereof Eastern, as the successor in interest to Fruitvale, is also a defendant in the action described in Section 1.11 (a) hereof The Court finds that the only other remaining Party in such action is the plaintiff City of San Jacinto. The Court retained continuing jurisdiction in such action, and Eastern has made annual reports pursuant to the Fruitvale Judgment. Pursuant to stipulation between Eastern and San Jacinto, and in accord with the Physical Solution and terms ofthis Judgment, the Court hereby finds that the rights and obligations of the Fruitvale Judgment have been subsumed in, and superseded by, this Judgment and are no longer enforceable; that the limitations upon the place and amounts of water use in the Fruitvale Judgment, the Purchase Agreement (including the provisions regarding domestic water Stipulated Judgment
-16-
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
rates within the Fruitvale Improvement District) and the Agency Agreements, all descnbed in Sections 1.11 (a), (b) and (c) are no longer applicable or enfor~eable; and that the continuing jurisdiction of the Court under the Fruitvale Judgment and the obligations ofEastern to report thereunder, are hereby terminated; provided, however, that any service area agreements or agreements related to mutual aid or system interties between any of the Public Agency Parties are not affected by this Judgment.

3.7 Fruitvale Agency Rights. The water rights of Hemet, San Jacinto and Lake Hemet under the several agreements with Eastern described in Section 1.11 (c) hereof have been incorporated in their respective Base Production Rights under this Judgment.

4. PRIVATE PUMPERS' WATER RIGHTS

4.1 Recognition of Rights. The Private Pumpers are owners of Overlying or other water rights to pump from the Management Area. The Public Agencies recognize these rights, and do not intend to take or adversely impact these rights without an agreement with the owner of such rights. There is no intent to affect water use that is consistent with the historical use ofthe Private Pumpers.

4.2 Non-Participation. A Private Pumper can elect not to participate in the Water Management Plan and not to formally acknowledge its existence. Such Pumpers are referred to as Non-Participants. Non-Participants shall continue to exercise whatever water rights they may hold under California law unaffected by the Plan. However, the Parties do not waive their rights to challenge any new or expanded use of water or water rights. NonParticipants will not have the option of intervening as a Party under the Judgment at a later date.

4.3 Class A Participation. A Private Pumper can become a Party to the Judgment as a Class A Participant under the following terms:

4.3.1 A Class A Participant who or which approves this Physical Solution may vote for and/or be elected to serve as the Private Pumper representative on the Watermaster, but other than as set forth in Sections 4.3.4 and 4.3.5, shall not otherwise have any obligation for the implementation of the Physical Solution or the Water Management Plan.

Stipulated Judgment
-17-
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
)

4.3.2 A Class A Participant may, without any assessment by the Watermaster, pump from the Participant's property within the Management Area the amount of water that can be put to reasonable and beneficial use in the Participant's historic place of use or as authorized under California law.

4.3.3 Unless the Watennaster determines otherwise, a Class A Participant shall have the right to convert to Class B Participation during a grace period that shall end 3 years after the entry of this Judgment and upon payment of the total assessments, without interest, that the Class A Participant would have paid had the Class A Participant elected to be a Class B Participant from the later of the initial production of Groundwater or the entry of the Judgment herein. Conversely, the converting Participant will be given Carry-Over Credits to which the Participant would have been entitled as a Class B Participant during said period pursuant to Section 6.9.2 below; said Carry-Over Credits may be used to offset any replenishment assessments, including any that would become due following the conversion.

4.3.4 A Class A Participant hereby authorizes the installation ofwater meters, and the collection and reading of Groundwater production, level and water quality data from the Class A Participant's well(s) by personnel authorized by the Watennaster. The metering, meter reading, and other related monitoring efforts shall be at no cost to the Class A Participant, and the Class A Participant shall receive copies of the reports and information obtained upon request.

4.3.5 A Class A Participant shall describe or otherwise identify the Participant's land and wells within the Management Area. The heirs, successors and assigns of such land and wells shall succeed to the benefits of the Participant's rights under the Judgment, and be bound by the obligations thereo~ provided that such successor intervenes as a Party under the Judgment. Absent such intervention, the successor will be treated as a Non-Participant.

4.4 Class B Participation. A Private Pumper can become a Class B Participant on the following terms:

4.4.1 A Class B Participant's Base Production Right shall be equal to the Participant's average annual production during the calendar years 1995 through 1999, less any Stipulated Judgment
-18-
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
)
amount of water that had been used on land that was developed for non-agricultural purposes after 1999, subject to adjustments by the Watermaster pursuant to Section 4.4.1.1. Any In-Lieu Water used during said period in place of Groundwater production shall be treated as part ofthe Groundwater production for calculating Base Production Rights. The Class B Participant shall pay Replenishment Assessments on amounts in excess of its Base Production Right, subject to any Carry-Over Credit adjustments pursuant to Section 6.9.2, but shall not be subject to Administrative Assessments, and until transfer to a Public Agency, such Base Production Right shall not be subject to reduction to Safe Yield. In the absence of production history for the entire period (1995-99), the Watermaster, using all available information including power consumption records and records of water use by similar farming operations in the area, will estimate the average annual production for the Participant.

4.4.1.1 In the event that the land of a Class B Participant or of a Class A Participant that requests conversion to Class B Participation did not go into full production during the period 1995-1999, or in the absence of a sufficient production history or record, the Watermaster will determine the Base Production Rights to be assigned to such Participant, using all information available to it.

4.4.1.2 Upon written request by a Class B Participant, the Watermaster shall have the authority to adjust the Class B Participant's Base Production Rights for such period, and on such terms and conditions, as the Watermaster deems appropriate under the circumstances. For example, but not by way oflimitation, the Watermaster could increase the Participant's Base Production Rights on a temporary basis to permit increased Groundwater production during dry periods, or for frost protection, with or without a requirement that such increased production be offset or "repaid" by a decrease in Groundwater production during subsequent wet periods, or to account for added acreage or for a change in crops or use of the land or for a change in ownership. Where new trees were planted during the period 1995-1999, the Waterrnaster may calculate the Base Production Rights based on known or estimated water use at maturity of such trees.

Stipulated Judgment
-19-
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

4.4.2 The Class B Participant approves this Physical Solution and may vote for and/or be elected to serve as the Private Pumper's representative on the Watermaster.

4.4.3 Upon conversion of a Class B Participant's land from agricultural to a use that requires water service from a Public Agency, the Public Agency shall credit, to the extent legally permissible, the Class B Participant's Base Production Right, adjusted pursuant to the percentage reductions in Sections 3 .2.1 and 3 .2.2, against any requirement then in effect for any water supply assessment requirements, against any fees associated with water supply that the Public Agency may then have in effect. The Public Agency serving the converted land shall receive a credit added to its Base Production Right as set forth in Section 3.2.4.

4.4.4 Upon the sale of property to which or for which Base Production Rights have been assigned by reason ofthe judgment herein, the Class B Participant may transfer said rights to the purchaser on condition that the purchaser agrees in writing to be bound by thee terms of the judgment as a Class B Participant.

4.4.5 The Class B Participant hereby authorizes the installation of meters and the collection and reading of Groundwater production, water level and water quality data from the Class B Participant's well(s) by personnel authorized by the Watermaster. The metering, meter reading and other related monitoring efforts shall be at no cost to the Class B Participant, and the Class B Participant shall receive copies of the reports and information obtained upon request.

4.4.6 A Class B Participant shall describe or otherwise identify the Participant's land and wells within the Management Area. The heirs, successors and assigns of such land and wells shall succeed to the benefits of the Participant's rights under the Judgment, and be bound by the obligations thereof, provided that such successor intervenes as a Party under the Judgment. Absent such intervention, the successor will be treated as a Non-Participant. A Class B Participant may transfer Base Production Rights to new or replacement land on terms and conditions established by the Watermaster.

4.5 In-Lieu Water Use. In the event any Private Pumper receives Supplemental Water from a Public Agency to serve an historic use in place of Groundwater, or Stipulated Judgment
-20-
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
otherwise engages in an in-lieu program after entry of the Judgment herein, the Overlying Right of the Private Pumper shall not be diminished by the receipt and use of such Supplemental Water or by engaging in an in-lieu program. In the event a Class B Participant received In-Lieu Water for use in place of Groundwater during the period 1995-99, for purposes of determining Base Production Rights, said use shall be considered as Groundwater use.

4.6 Future Production Participation. Any New Pumper after the entry of this Judgment may intervene in this action and Judgment only as a Class A Participant and may not thereafter convert to Class B status.

4.7 Replacement WeUs. Re-drilling of existing wells and the drilling of new wells to replace existing wells will not be considered new production as provided in Section 4.6.

5. TRIBAL WATER RIGHTS
The Tribal Water Rights have been determined as part of a settlement among the Soboba Tribe, the United States, Eastern, Lake Hemet and Metropolitan. The settlement is reflected in a Settlement Agreement, Congressional legislation and appropriation of funds, and a Judgment in the Soboba Action. Such settlement includes the following provisions, which shall be effective only upon fulfillment of all of the conditions precedent set forth in Article 3 of the Settlement Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto.

5.1 Senior Right. The Soboba Tribe shall have a prior and paramount right, superior to all others, to pump 9000 acre-feet per year (3000 acre feet from the Canyon Subbasin and the remainder from a portion of the San Jacinto Upper Pressure Subbasin referred to as the Intake Subbasin), for use on the Reservation, as defined in Article 2.20 ofthe Settlement Agreement, and on lands now owned or hereafter acquired by the Soboba Tribe contiguous to th Reservation or within the Canyon and Intake Subbasins; provided, however, that such use shall be limited to amounts set forth in a development schedule from 2,900 acre feet per year to 4,100 acre-feet per year for the first 50 years after the Effective Date as set forth in Exhibit ''I" to the Settlement Agreement. The Tribe's right to pump applies to all Groundwater, whether replenished by Natural Recharge or by Supplemental Water. In addition, the Tribe shall have the right to purchase additional water from the Watermaster during the fifty years that its use is Stipulated Judgment
-21-
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
)
limited according to Exhibit "I" to the Settlement Agreement at the rate then being charged to th Public Agencies under the Water Management Plan. In the event the Soboba Tribe is unable, except for mechanical failure of its wells, pumps or water facililties, to produce from its existing wells or equivalent replacements up to 3,000 AFA production from the Canyon Subbasin and the remainder of its Tribal Water Rights from the Intake Subbasin, Eastern and Lake Hemet shall deliver any shortage to the Soboba Tribe as provided in Section 4.1 C of the Settlement Agreement. Pumping for such purpose shall not be subject to Administrative or Replenishment Assessments, and shall not be counted as part of Adjusted Production Rights.

5.2 Metropolitan Water. The Soboba settlement provides, among other matters, that Metropolitan will use its best efforts to deliver sufficient Imported Water to yield 7,500 acre-feet per year, based upon 15 year averages, for Recharge in the Management Area at its untreated replenishment water rate, or any successor rate of equivalent price as provided in Section 4.4A of the Settlement Agreement.

5.3 Settlement Payment. Subject to the Effective Date of the Settlement Agreement and funding by the United States, Eastern pursuant to the terms set forth in the Water Management Plan, will pay the Soboba Tribe $17 million dollars pursuant to Article 4.7A of the Settlement Agreement in consideration, in part, of the Tribe's agreement to limit its water use according to Exhibit "I" to the Settlement Agreement for the first 50 years after the Effective Date. Subject to contracts with Eastern, the Public Agencies shall have the right to pump and use all Imported Water not used by the Tribe, and the unused portion of the Tribal Water Rights shall be available for use by the Parties, pursuant to their rights herein.

5.4 Capital Facilities. Eastern on behalfofthe Water Management Plan participants will receive $10 million from the United States, to be applied to the costs of constructing and operating the Phase I capital facilities necessary to import and Recharge Supplemental Water as described in the Plan.

5.5 Public Agencies' Use of Facilitie-s. Additional grant funds from the State of California or the United States may also be available for such capital facilities. The rights of Stipulated Judgment
-22-
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
the Public Agencies to the use of such facilities will be affirmed by contract as set forth in Sections 9.6.4(1) and 9.6.4(3).

5.6 Acknowledgement of Soboba Tribe Settlement. The Parties to this Judgment hereby recognize the Tribal Water Rights, as set forth above, and the applicable provisions of the Soboba Tribe Settlement Agreement, and acknowledge that protection ofTribal Water Rights is one of the goals of the Water Management Plan.

6. PHYSICAL SOLUTION.

6.1 Purpose and Objective. Pursuant to California water law and the California Constitution, article X, section 2, the Court adopts this Physical Solution to maximize reasonable beneficial use of Surface Water, Groundwater and Supplemental Water for water users in or dependent upon the Management Area, to eliminate Overdraft, to protect the prior rights ofthe Soboba Tribe, and to provide the Parties with the substantial enjoyment of their respective rights, including, the priorities thereof

6.2 Need for Flexibility. In order to adapt to potential changes in hydrology, land use, and social and economic conditions, the Physical Solution must provide some degree o flexibility and adaptability. Accordingly, the Court retains broad jurisdiction to supplement the discretion granted to the Watermaster herein.

6.3 Rights to Groundwater. Groundwater in the Management Area may occur from: Natural Recharge; spreading operations of natural flows; Recharge with Supplemental Water acquired with assessment funds; return flows, fallowing or in-lieu recharge programs financed with assessment funds. All such Groundwater shall be available to support the pumping ofthe Parties as allowed herein, and shall not be the property of any individual Party. Subject to the provisions of Section 6. 7 .2, this Section does not preclude any Party, pursuant to a Storage Agreement, from storing Supplemental Water at its own cost, retaining title thereto, and pumping such water without assessment.

6.4 Resolution of Priorities. By reason of the long and continuous Overdraft ofthe Management Area, the contribution of all Parties to the Overdraft, the economies that have developed on the basis of the Overdraft, the severe economic disruption that could occur under Stipulated Judgment
-23-
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
strict priorities and the doctrines of prescription and laches, the complexity of determining appropriative priorities, and the need to make the maximum beneficial use ofthe water resources of the State, the Parties are estopped and barred from asserting specific priorities or preferences to the pumping of Groundwater in the Management Area, except as provided in this Judgment, and the Court finds that the provisions of this Judgment provide for the substantial enjoyment of the respective rights of the Parties.

6.5 Water Management Plan. The Watermaster will approve and implement a Water Management Plan to enforce and implement the Physical Solution, and may modify such Plan as conditions require, subject to the provisions of the Settlement Agreement. The Plan will also facilitate and accommodate the settlement of the water rights of the Soboba Tribe, and shall be subject to the approval of the Soboba Tribe and the United States as trustee for the Tribe.

The Parties agree that the Plan shall incorporate and serve to implement the following goals:

6.5.1 Groundwater levels within the Management Area have generally been declining for a number of years, and the Management Area is presently in a condition of Overdraft. The Watermaster shall calculate the Safe Yield of the Management Area on an annual basis, at least until the Overdraft is substantially eliminated. The Plan will, within a reasonable period, eliminate Groundwater Overdraft and provide for excess production by implementing a combination of available water resources management elements. These elements include: reduction in natural Groundwater production; enhanced Recharge with native and/or Supplemental Water; increased use of Recycled Water; in-lieu replenishment; acquisition and development of Supplemental Water; and water conservation programs.

6.5.2 The Management Area is expected to experience residential, commercial, and industrial growth and development over the next decade. The estimated amount of Supplemental Water that will be necessary to provide for and adequately serve this new growth and development is 15,000 acre feet per year. The Water Management Plan shall accommodate the orderly expansion of existing water production and service systems, and provide a clear planning process for meeting these projected growth trends.

Stipulated Judgment
-24-
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

6.5.3 The Plan should be implemented in a manner to protect and/or enhance Management Area water quality.

6. 5.3 .1 The W atermaster is authorized to undertake direct operations in connection with reducing, controlling or dealing with Groundwater Degradation, including development or purchase of water supplies of any nature (local private rights, Imported Water, Recycled Water, salvaged water, and/or low quality water).

6.5.3.2 The Watermaster is also authorized to provide incentives to the Public Agencies or other Groundwater producers to encourage production of Degraded Groundwater as the Watermaster deems appropriate. For example, the Watermaster could provide that all or some portion of such production would not be charged against the producer's Base Production Rights and/or could adjust or not impose the Administrative and/or Replenishment Assessment otherwise due. The Watermaster may determine the appropriate incentives on a case-by-case basis or may establish a formula or schedule that would reflect or be based on benefits to the Management Area resulting from such production.

6.5.3.3 If implementation of certain elements of the Plan causes limited localized water quality Degradation and such Degradation impedes the then current beneficial uses of water by any Public Agency in the Management Area, the Watermaster shall implement appropriate mitigation measures to ensure the water supply to the affected Public Agency, and shall bear the associated cost.

6.5.3.4 The standards for local water quality Degradation shall be defined by the Watennaster, and such definitions may be amended from time to time.

6.5.4 The Water Management Plan should serve to support the pursuit o cost-effective water supply and water treatment by the Public Agencies, both individually and collectively.

6.5.5 The Water Management Plan should serve to protect Tribal Water Rights.

6.5.6 The Watermaster shall implement a monitoring program to ensure that Plan activities follow best management and engineering principles to protect Management Stipulated Judgment
-25-
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
Area water resources, and to compile and analyze data on Groundwater production, water levels, water quality and Groundwater in storage.

6.6 Replenishment Program. The Groundwater replenishment programs be administered by the Watermaster. The program shall include: the acquisition of Supplemental Water; the collection and expenditure ofReplenishment Assessments; the Recharge of the Management Area; and the construction and operation of all necessary facilities, including but not limited to, development of surface and subsurface percolation and injection facilities. In addition, a source of Recharge Water for agencies contributing to the Settlement Payment described in Section 5.3 will be Imported Water provided by Metropolitan under the Settlement Agreement, and not used by the Soboba Tribe.

6.6.1 Priority for replenishment will be based on an equitable apportiomnent of available replenishment water among the subbasins after full consideration of:

6.6.1.1 The Public Agency's participation in the payment in the Settlement Payment described in Section 5.3.

6.6.1.2 Hydrologic conditions in the Management Area.

6.6.1.3 The Management Area's Water demands.

6.6.1.4 The availability of storage capacity to accommodate the Natural Recharge of surface flows.

6.6.1.5 The availability of appropriate conveyance facilities.

6.6.1.6 The availability of Supplemental Water,

6.6.1.7 Protection ofTribal Water Rights.

6.6.2 The Watermaster is encouraged to take advantage of surplus Imported Water from Metropolitan that occasionally may be available at low cost, and to use available assessment funds to bank such Recharge Water against future production in excess of Adjusted Production Rights.

6.6.3 The Public Agencies shall independently or jointly operate their present facilities to maximize the existing spreading and Recharge operations of natural flow in Stipulated Judgment
-26-
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
the Management Area. Such Recharge Water shall be available to support the pumping of all users, and shall not be the property of the spreading Public Agency.

6.6.4 All water used to replenish any subbasin in the Management Area shall meet the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region requirements, and the provisions of Article 4.2 of the Settlement Agreement, and may be used in any subbasin where such requirements are met.

6.7 Storage Rights. Unused storage capacity may exist in the Management Area, and this capacity will be managed by the Watermaster conjunctively with natural and available Supplemental Water supplies.

6.7.1 Subject to availability of assessment funds and unused storage capacity as determined by Watermaster, the Management Area may be Recharged when water is available, to be drawn upon by the Public Agencies in later years when such Supplemental Water may not be available.

6.7.2 Unused storage capacity, as determined by Watermaster, and pursuant to a Storage Agreement, may be used for "put and take" operations with Supplemental Water that is paid for by any Public Agency provided that:

6.7.2.1 Such operations do not interfere with the rights of any other pumper, or with the use of the storage capacity for Recharge and storage under the Water Management Plan.

6.7.2.2 The Watermaster shall have the first right to purchase any water available for Recharge for use under the Plan.

6.7.2.3 Later recovery of Stored Water shall exclude losses, and shall not be subject to either Administrative or Replenishment Assessments.
service area ofthe Party.
storage.

6. 7.2.4 Such recovered water may be used anywhere within the

6. 7.2.5 Such Stored Water may be transferred while still in Stipulated Judgment
-27-
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

6. 7.3 Any conjunctive use programs within the Management Area for the benefit ofterritory outside of the Management Area shall be subject to the Watermaster's approval and the governance provisions herein. Any storage, conjunctive use programs by third Parties, or in-lieu recharge programs financed with assessment funds, shall be subject to the Watermaster's approval and the governance provisions herein; provided that Metropolitan has the right under the Soboba Settlement Agreement to use up to 40,000 acre-feet of storage capacity in the San Jacinto Upper Pressure Subbasin for the pre-delivery of water required under Section 5.2.

6. 7.4 Eastern and Lake Hemet have previously provided water for replenishment ofthe Management Area. As of May 1, 2005 these amounts, less losses, were 12,694 acre-feet for Eastern and 950 acre-feet for Lake Hemet Such Parties shall have Recharge Rights to recover these amounts, less any future losses, without either Administrative or Replenishment Assessments, and may use such Rights to offset excess pumping in lieu of Replenishment Assessments. The water available under such Recharge Rights shall be pumped within 15 years of the entry ofthis Judgment, but not more than 2000 acre-feet in a single year.

The Public Agencies shall notifY the Watennaster when such Recharged Water is being pumped, and in what amounts, and the Watermaster shall keep an accounting of the amounts remaining.

The use of such credits shall be interpreted and administered so as not to increase the replenishment obligations or assessments of those Parties without such past credits, or after such credits have been fully used.

6. 7.5 The accounting for recovery of Stored Water or Recharge Water :from the Management Area shall not include any water that escapes therefrom and migrates downstream beyond the Management Area. Losses will be calculated based upon best engineering principles.

6.8 Recvcled Water. The use of Recycled Water produced by Eastern can be of substantial benefit in providing additional water in the Management Area. The Watermaster shall have a right of :first refusal to purchase all Recycled Water produced from treatment Stipulated Judgment
-28-
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
facilities serving the Management Area that is not subject to then existing contracts. Such Recycled Water may be used for Recharge or direct use within the Management Area.

6.8.1 Each Public Agency may implement its own Recycled Water program, for direct use, subject to the availability of Recycled Water. The Public Agency shall be responsible for financing, operating and maintaining the facilities necessary for that program.

The Waterrnaster will support loan or grant applications, and the Public Agencies will work to integrate Recycled Water into the Water Management Plan, to the extent economically feasible while meeting regulatory standards.

6.8.2 Currently only Eastern has Recycled Water available for Recharge.

To the extent such Recycled Water is not acquired by the Watermaster for use under the Plan, any such water recharged in the Management Area shall remain the property of Eastern and may be pumped (less losses) without Replenishment Assessments.

6.9 Assessment Program. The Assessment Program contemplated by the Water Management Plan and consisting of Administrative Assessments and Replenishment Assessments as described in Sections 1.2, 1.30, and 3.4, respectively, shall be administered by Eastern pursuant to a contract with the Waterrnaster pursuant to the provisions of Section

9.6.4(5).

6.9.1 All Assessments shall be used for Replenishment Expenses and Administrative Expenses.

6.9.2 Subject to the limitations in this Judgment, each Public Agency that produces less than its Adjusted Production Right and share oflmported Water, and any Class B Participant producing less than its Base Production Right, shall have the following Carry-Over Credit:

6.9.2.1 Carry-Over Credit shall be the difference in acre-feet between a Public Agency's Adjusted Production Right and share oflmported Water and Supplemental Water, and the Public Agency's actual production in a calendar year, or the Class B Participant's Base Production Right and the Class B Participant's actual production in a calendar year.

Stipulated Judgment
-29-
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
)

6.9.2.2 The Carry-Over Credit may be applied to reduce the amount of acre feet upon which a Public Agency or Class B Participant must pay a Replenishment Assessment either for the previous year or in any subsequent year. Carry-Over Credits are transferable by a Public Agency to the Watermaster or, subject to a right of :first refusal by the Watermaster, to another Public Agency. Carry-Over Credits may be retained for more than one calendar year. The Public Agencies shall notify the Watermaster if a Carry-Over Credit is being retained. The Public Agencies shall notify the Watermaster if a Carry-Over Credit is being transferred and shall provide information requested by the Watermaster regarding the transfer.

6.9.2.3 The Waterrnaster shall keep an accounting of all Carry-Over Credits.

6.9.3 All Waterrnaster assessment invoices shall be payable to Watermaster within 60 days of notice. Any delinquent assessments shall bear interest at a rate to be set by the Watermaster. Watermaster is entitled to recover its reasonable expenses in collecting any assessment, including attorney's fees and costs.

6.9.4 The Watermaster is authorized to adjust assessments, where deemed appropriate, to provide incentives for production of Degraded Groundwater as described in Section 6.5.3.

6.10 Export. The Public Agencies may export water outside the Management Area, on a temporary basis, upon approval by the Waterrnaster. However, any water exported shall be replenished with an appropriate amount of similar or better quality water as determined by Watermaster. Water exports by the Public Agencies shall not interfere with the Water Management Plan or any other Public Agency's operations. The Water Management Plan will set forth the specific criteria for the export of water, including, but not limited to, conjunctive use programs.

6.11 Capital Facilities. Each Public Agency shall continue to own its existing capital facilities for water supply and management, subject to the provisions of Section 9.6.6.

However, the Phase I capital facilities necessary to implement the Water Management Plan shall Stipulated Judgment
-30-
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
be owned and operated by Eastern, pursuant to the Plan and in a fiduciary capacity for the bene:fi of all Parties under this Judgment, pursuant to Sections 5.4; 9.6.4(1); 9.6.4(3).

6.11.1 Financing ofWater Management Plan facilities maybe funded by assessments, regional capital fees, loans and grants, contributions for Storage Rights by Metropolitan or other third-parties, and municipal bonds. Responsibility for the costs of future capital facilities necessary to implement the Plan, beyond the Phase I facilities, shall be · determined by the Watermaster and apportioned based on relative benefit to be derived by each Public Agency.

6.11.2 Any of the participating Public Agencies may propose projects to be included in the Water Management Plan to increase the Management Area water supply.

Such proposals, after evaluation by the Watermaster, shall be included or rejected. If the Watermaster chooses to reject the proposal, the proposing Public Agency may implement the rejected project at its own cost so long as it does not significantly impact the implementation of the Management Plan and/or interfere with the ongoing production by the Public Agencies.

7. INJUNCTION.

Each Party and his, her or its officers, agents, employees, successors and assigns, is enjoined and restrained from:

7.1 Producing water from the Management Area without payment of required 1 9 Administrative Assessments.
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 7.2 Producing water from the Management Area in excess ofthe Party's Adjusted Production Right and share oflmported Water, or the Base Production Right in the case of a Class B Participant, without payment of required Replenishment Assessments.

Judgment.

7.3 7.4

7.5 Transferring Production Rights except as authorized in this Judgment.

Recharging water in the Management Area except as authorized in this Storing or exporting water except as authorized in this Judgment.

Stipulated Judgment
-31-
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

8. CONTINUING JURISDICTION.

8.1 Full Jurisdiction. Full jurisdiction, power and authority is reserved to the Court as to all matters contained in this Judgment, including expedited intervention by successors in interest to Private Pumpers, except:

8.1.1 To redetermine Base Production Rights of the Public Agencies or Class B Participants.

8.1.2 As otherwise limited by law.

8.2 Motion to Interpret. By motion to the Court, upon 30 days written notice and after hearing, any Party or Watermaster may request the Court to make such further or supplemental orders to interpret, enforce, carry-out or amend this Judgment. Any such motion shall be reviewed de novo by the Court. Any such motion shall be served on all Parties and Watermaster at the addresses on the Watermaster's notice list.

9. WATERMASTER.

9.1 Composition. The Watermaster shall consist of a board composed of one elected official and one alternate selected by each of the Public Agencies and one Private Pumper representative and one alternate selected by the Class A and Class B Private Pumpers.

9.2 Terms. Each member ofthe Watermaster shall serve until replaced by the Public Agency or Private Pumpers that made the original appointment, provided, however, that the election or removal of a Private Pumper representative shall be decided by a majority vote of the Class A and Class B Participants attending a meeting called for that purpose by written notic sent to each Class A and Class B Participant or their successors, by U. S. mail or electronic mail at least ten (1 0) days before such meeting. Said notice shall include the date, time and location of the meeting.

9.3 Removal and Replacement. Any Watermaster member may be removed and replaced by the same procedure used in his or her appointment.

9.4 Voting. Each member ofthe Watermaster shall have one vote. Four affirmative votes shall be required in order to constitute Watermaster action on each of the following matters. (1) any change sought in the form of governance; (2) any change in voting Stipulated Judgment
-32-
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
requirements; (3) retaining the services oflegal counsel and Advisor; ( 4) establishing, levying, increasing or decreasing all assessment amounts; (5) adopting or amending an annual budget; (6) determining the extent of Overdraft and quantifying Safe Yield; (7) determining Adjusted Production Rights; (8) decisions regarding the financing of Supplemental Water or facilities, other than any financing provisions included in this Stipulated Judgment as provided in Sections

5.3, 5.4, 5.5 hereof; (9) decisions regarding ownership of facilities, other than ownership ofthe Phase I facilities described in the Water Management Plan, which shall be owned by Eastern Municipal Water District, subject to a right of use by those Parties participating in the financing thereof; (10) policies for the management of the Management Area; (11) and any decision that involves a substantial commitment by the Watermaster, including any contracts for conserved water. All other actions by the Watermaster shall require three affirmative votes.

9.5 Court Review. Any action by the Watermaster, or any failure to act by virtue of insufficient votes, may be reviewed by the Court on motion by any Party, with notice to all other Parties. The Court's review shall be de novo, and the Court's decision shall constitute action by the Watermaster.

9.6 Powers and Duties. In order to implement the provisions of this Judgment, the Watermaster shall have the following duties and powers:

9.6.1 Water Management Plan. Watermaster shall develop and implement a Water Management Plan, with such additions and modifications as may from time to time be appropriate, and shall administer the provisions ofthis Judgment. The Water Management Plan shall be subject to approval by the Court, by the Soboba Tribe, and by the United States.

9.6.2 Independent Counsel. The Watermaster shall retain independent legal counsel to provide such legal services as the Watermaster may direct.

9.6.3 Advisor. The Watermaster shall retain either an independent engineering firm or qualified individual experienced in hydrology to evaluate and analyze the data collected by Eastern, and any conclusions based thereon, and to make recommendations to the Watermaster, referred to herein as "Advisor." The Advisor shall also provide general Stipulated Judgment
-33-
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
coordination among Eastern, the Technical Advisory Committee and the Watermaster with respect to their respective functions, and perform such executive functions as the Watermaster may direct. The Watermaster reserves the right to refer any matter it may choose to any Person it may select for assistance in carrying out its duties under this Judgment.

9.6.4 Operations and Other Functions.

9.6.4.1 Operations- Phase I Facilities. The Phase I Facilities (including capital facilities and spreading basins, as more particularly defmed in the Water Management Plan) are either existing facilities ofEastem that will be expanded or improved as part ofthe Water Management Plan, or are new facilities that will be integrated into Eastern's existing facilities and will be owned by Eastern. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of contracts to be entered into between Eastern and the Watermaster, and Eastern and the other Public Agencies, Eastern shall construct, install, and operate the Phase I Facilities consistent wit the Water Management Plan.

9.6.4.2 Operations- Other Facilities. The Water Management Plan anticipates the need for the construction and installation of other facilities in order to accomplish the goals of the Judgment. Such facilities may be constructed, installed and operated under contract with the Watermaster, by a member of the Watermaster or, in circumstances approved by the Watermaster, by other responsible entities.

9.6.4.3 Purchase of Water for Groundwater Recharge. The Soboba settlement requires Metropolitan to use its best efforts to deliver an average of7500 acre-feet per year oflmported Water for Recharge ofthe Management Area. This supply is dedicated :first to satisfy the rights ofthe Soboba Tribe as provided in the Settlement Agreement.

Such portion of the supply that is not used by the Soboba Tribe will be available to those Parties who have participated in the cost thereof Subject to the approval of the Watermaster, Eastem shall enter into a contract with Metropolitan for the purchase and delivery of such Imported Water supply .. Eastern shall also purchase as a member agency of Metropolitan, or otherwise acquire, such additional supplies of water as may be directed by the Watermaster to implement the Water Management Plan, subject to availability and transmission capacity. All such water Stipulated Judgment
-34-
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
)
delivered by Metropolitan, or otherwise acquired by Eastern, and all Eastern facilities used to deliver, recharge and recapture such water, shall be subject to rights of use by the Parties entitled thereto. Such rights of use shall be confirmed in detail in written contracts with Eastern.

Recycled water is also available for direct and indirect Groundwater Recharge from Eastern's wastewater treatment facilities serving the Management Area. The Watermaster shall have a right of first refusal to purchase all Recycled Water produced from such plants that is not subject to then existing contracts. The Watermaster is authorized to use its funds, or funds provided by the Parties, to purchase Imported Water, Supplemental Water, or other water.

9.6.4.4 Data Collection. The Watermaster shall provide for the collection and maintenance of all production, water level, water quality, and other technical data necessary under or required by the Water Management Plan (''Data"). Pursuant to the terms and conditions of a contract to be entered into between Eastern and the Watermaster, Eastern shall collect and maintain all such Data and transmit such Data to the Watermaster, its Advisor, and the Technical Advisory Committee as directed by the Watermaster. The foregoing clause does not restrict the ability of the Watermaster to enter into other agreements with other members of the Watermaster and/or private firms and individuals for the collection ofData.

9.6.4.5 Accounting.

9.6.4.5.1 Financial Accounting. The Watermaster shall
provide for the levy, billing, and collection of all assessments provided for under the Judgment, for the payment of costs and expenses of the Watermaster, and for the performance of such accounting and related functions as may be required in connection with those functions ("Accounting Functions"). All funds collected shall be held in a segregated account. All expenses and disbursements shall be separately accounted for. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of a contract to be entered into between Eastern and the Watermaster, Eastern shall initially perform the Accounting Functions for Watermaster. The foregoing clause does not restrict the ability of the Watermaster to enter into other agreements with other members of the Watermaster and/or private finns and individuals to provide some or all of the Accounting Functions.

Stipulated Judgment
-35-
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

9.6.4.5.2 Water Use, Storage and Transfers. The
Watermaster shall account for all production by Class A and Class B Participants and Public Agencies using information reported or obtained for that purpose. The Watermaster shall also account for Carry-Over Credits, including the transfer thereof where authorized, and for the use and/or storage and/or transfers oflmported Water by Public Agencies.

9.6.5 Technical Advisory Committee. There has been a Technical Advisory Committee that has functioned throughout the development of the Water Management Principles and Plan, and this Stipulated Judgment. That Connnittee has been composed of such managerial and technical representatives as the individual Parties decide to appoint. Each Party has paid the costs of its own representatives, and shall continue to do so in the future. The Technical Advisory Committee shall continue to function, and to provide such technical assistance as the Watermaster may request. The Technical Advisory Committee shall make recommendations to the Watermaster's Advisor and to the Watermaster on all matters requiring four votes for Watermaster action, and shall receive from Eastern all data associated with such matters for its review and evaluation. The Technical Advisory Connnittee and its members shall also function as a way to keep the City Councils, Boards of Directors and participating Private Pumpers fully informed about the implementation of this Judgment.

9.6.6 Reservation of Rights. The Watermaster reserves the right to assume, on its own, any functions set forth in Section 9.6.4, except as provided in Section

9.6.4(1), and to undertake all other acts required to implement the Plan and this Judgment, so long as it is legally capable of performing such functions. The Watermaster, if it should choose, may also act through or in conjunction with the other Public Agencies, or through a Joint Powers Agency composed of all the Public Agencies hereunder. Except as specifically provided in Section 9.6.4(1) with respect to Eastern's facilities used in Phase I, the Watermaster shall have no right to use or acquire the water facilities of any of the Parties, without their consent, provided that it is the intent of the Parties that their individual facilities will be available where appropriat to implement the Water Management Plan, upon terms equitable to all Parties, and consistent with their respective obligations to their own customers.

Stipulated Judgment
-36-
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
)

9.6.7 Rules and Regulations. The Watermaster may make such rules and regulations as may be necessary for its own operations as well as for the operation of the Plan and this Judgment, subject to Court approval. Meetings of the Watermaster shall be subject to the Brown Act .

9.6.8 Reports to Court. The Watermaster shall file annually with the Court, and serve on all Parties, a report regarding its activities during the preceding year, including an audited statement of all accounts and financial activities.

9.6.9 Notice to Parties. Watermaster shall maintain a current list of the Parties and their addresses for notice purposes. Rules for service shall be governed by the California Code of Civil Procedure and the California Rules of Court. Each Party shall notify Watermaster in writing ofthe name and address for its receipt of notice and service under this Judgment. A Party may change this infonnation by written notice to Watermaster. Notice shall be deemed sufficient if directed to the most recent address provided by the Watermaster.

9.7 Watermaster Records. Watermaster's records shall be kept at the office of Eastern unless changed by the Watermaster and approved by the Court. These records shall be treated as public records under the Public Records Act. California Government Code sections 6250-6277 (West 1995 and Supp. 2002).

10. MISCELLANEOUS.

10.1 Intervention After Judgment. A New Pumper can intervene in this action as a Class A Participant only, pursuant to Section 4.6. Any other Person who is an heir, successor or assign of an existing Party, may become a Party to this action and Judgment, subject to the conditions contained herein, by filing a petition in intervention. The petition may be filed and approved ex parte with notice to the Watermaster. Such intervener shall thereafter be a Pa bound by this Judgment, and entitled to the rights and privileges accorded under this Judgment to the Party such Person succeeds in this action.

10.2 Loss of Rights. No right adjudicated in this Judgment shall be lost by non-use, abandonment, forfeiture or otherwise, except upon a written election by the owner of the right filed with Watermaster, or by order of the Court upon noticed motion and after hearing.

Stipulated Judgment
-37-
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
-_)

10.3. Attorney's Fees and Costs. No Party shall recover any attorney's fees or costs in this proceeding from any Party.

DATED: --o/-ll-, zofo.

M.P. PAULETTE D. BARKLEY
Commissioner, Superior Court of
JUD~~t;t~e~gm: COURT
Stipulated Judgment
-38-

EXHIBIT A
IME
" A
0 0.5 1
~Mil es
• Cities
'--Major Watercourses
- Lakes and. Reservoirs
-- Major Roads
Management Area and Management Zones July 2006
Hemet I San Jacinto Water Management Plan •source: EMWD Figure 1.1 EXHIBIT "A"

CITY OF SAN JACINTO
2025 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN

APPENDIX H
ORDINANCE NO. 09-16
•
)

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss

CITY OF SAN JACINTO )
ORDINANCE NO. 09-16

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SAN
JACINTO AMENDING SECTION 13.04.070 OF CHAPTER

13.04 OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO MUNICIPAL CODE

ESTABLISHING WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER

SUPPLY SHORTAGE PROGRAM AND REGULATIONS
WHEREAS1 water is Riverside County's most precious natural resource; and WHEREAS, a reliable minimum supply of potable water is essential to the public health, safety and welfare of the people and economy of the southern California region; and
WHEREAS, Southern California is a semi-arid region and is largely dependent upon imported water supplies. A growing population, climate change, environmental concerns, and other factors in other parts of the State and western United States, make the region highly susceptible to water supply reliability Issues; and WHEREAS, residents, governments, businesses, and agriculture must work together to ensure the efficient use of water in homes, landscapes, public facilities and businesses; and
WHEREAS, Riverside County, water agencies and municipal governments are committed to the development and implementation of water conservation and supply shortage guidelines; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Jacinto has developed and adopted water conservation and water supply shortage program and regulations.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SectJon 1. Section 13.04 7 0 of Chapter 13.04 of the San Jacinto Municipal Code is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
"13.04 .070
A. Findings

1. A reliable minimum supply of potable water is essential to the public health, safety and welfare of the people and economy of the southern Califomia region.

2. Southern California is a semi-arid region and is largely dependent upon Imported water supplies. A growing population, climate change, environmental concerns, • B.
and other factors in other parts of the State and western United States, make the region highly susceptible to water supply reliability issues.

3. Careful water management that Includes active water conservation measures not only in times of drought, but at all times, is essential to ensure a reliable minimum supply of water to meet current and future water supply needs.

4. Article X, Section 2 of the California Constitution declares that the general welfare requires that water resources be put to beneficial use, waste or unreasonable use or unreasonable method of use of water be prevented, and conservation of water be fully exercised with a view to the reasonable and beneficial use thereof.

5. Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution declares that a city or county may make and enforce within Its limits all local. police, sanitary, and other ordinances and regulations not in conflict with general laws.

6. California Water Code section 375 authorizes water suppliers to adopt and enforce a comprehensive water conservation program to reduce water consumption and conserve supplies.

7. The adoption and enforcement of a water conservation and supply shortage program is necessary to manage the City of San Jacinta's potable water supply in the short and long-term and to avoid or minimize the effects of drought and shortage within the City of San Jacinto. Such program is essential to ensure a reliable and sustainable minimum supply of water for the public health, safety and welfare .

Declaration of Purpose and Intent.

1. The purpose of this chapter is to establish a water conservation and supply shortage program that will reduce water consumption within the City of San Jacinto through conservation. enable effective water supply planning, assure reasonable and beneficial use of water, prevent waste of water, and maximize the efficient use of water within the City of San Jacinto to avoid and minimize the effect and hardship of water shortage to the greatest extent possible.

2. This chapter establishes permanent water conservation standards intended to alter behavior related to water use efficiency at all times and further establishes three levels of water supply shortage response actions to be implemented during times of declared water shortage or declared water shortage emergency, with Increasing restrictions on water use in response to worsening drought or emergency conditions and decreasing supplies.

C. Definitions.

1. The following words and phrases whenever used in this chapter have the meaning defined In this section:
"Billing unit" means the unit of water used to apply water rates for purposes of calculating water charges for a persons water usage.
)
D.
"Landscape irrigation system., means an irrigation system with pipes, hoses, spray heads, or sprinkling devices that are operated by hand or through an automated system.
"Large landscape areas" means a lawn, landscape, or other vegetated area, or combination thereof, equal to more than one (1) acre of irrigable land. "Person" means any natural person or persons, corporation, public or private, governmental agency or institution, including all agencies and departments of City of San Jacinto, or any other user of water provided by the City of San Jacinto.
''Potable water'' means water which is suitable for drinking. "Recycled water'' means the reclamation and reuse of non·potable water for beneficial use as defined In Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations. "Single pass cooling systems" means equipment where water is circulated only once to cool equipment before being disposed.

Application

1. The provisions of this section apply to any person in the use of any potable water provided by the City of San Jacinto.

2. The provisions of this chapter do not apply to uses of water necessary to protect public health and safety or for essential government services, such as police, fire and other similar emergency services.

3. The provisions of this chapter do not apply to the use of recycled water.

4. The provisions of this section do not apply to the use of water by commercial nurseries and commercial growers to sustain plants, trees, shrubs, crops or other vegetation intended for commercial sale.

5. This section is intended solely to further the conservation of water. It Is not Intended to Implement any provision of federal, State, or local statutes, ordinances, or regulations relating to protection of water quality or control of drainage or runoff. Refer to the local jurisdiction or Regional Water Quality Control Board for information on any stormwater ordinances and stormwater management plans.

E. Permanent Water Conservation Requirements - Prohibition Against Waste The following water conservation requirements are effective at all times and are permanent. Violations of this section will be considered waste and an unreasonable use of water.

1. Limits on Watering Hours: Watering or irrigating of lawn, landscape or other vegetated area with potable water is prohibited between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Pacific Standard Time on any day, except by use of a handheld bucket or similar container, a hand-held hose equipped with a positive self- closing water shut-off nozzle or device, or for very short periods of time for the express purpose of adjusting or repairing an irrigation system.

2. Limit on Watering Duration: Watering or irrigating of lawn, landscape or other vegetated area with potable water using a landscape irrigation system or a watering device that is not continuously attended is limited to no more than fifteen (15) minutes of watering per day per station. This subsection does not apply to landscape irrigation systems that exclusively use very low•flow drip type irrigation systems when no emitter produces more than two (2) gallons of water per hour and weather based controllers or stream rotor sprinklers that meet a 70% efficiency standard.

3. No Excessive Water Flow or Runoff: Watering or irrigating of any lawn, landscape or other vegetated area in a manner that causes or allows excessive water flow or runoff onto an adjoining sidewalk, driveway, street, alley, gutter or ditch is prohibited.

4. No Washing Down Hard or Paved Surfaces: Washing down hard or paved surfaces, walls, roofs, including but not limited to sidewalks, walkways, driveways, parking areas, tennis courts. patios or alleys, is prohibited except when necessary to alleviate safety or sanitary hazards, and then only by use of a hand-held bucket or similar container, a hand-held hose equipped with a positive self.closing water shut-off device, a low-volume, high-pressure cleaning machine equipped to recycle any water used, or a low-volume high-pressure water broom.

5. Obligation to Fix Leaks, Breaks or Malfunctions: Excessive use, loss or escape of water through breaks, leaks or other malfunctions in the water user's plumbing or distribution system for any period of time after such escape of water should have reasonably been discovered and corrected and in no event more than 72 hours of receiving notice from the City of San Jacinto, is prohibited.

6. Re-circulating Water Required for Water Fountains and Decorative Water Features: Operating a water fountain or other decorative water feature that does not use re-circulated water is prohibited.

7. Limits on Washing Vehicles: Using water to wash or clean a vehicle, including but not limited to any automobile, truck, van, bus, motorcycle, boat or trailer, whether motorized or not is prohibited, except by use of a hand-held bucket or similar container or a hand•held hose equipped with a positive selfclosing water shut-off nozzle or device. This subsection does not apply to any commercial car washing facility.

8. Drinking Water Served Upon Request Only: Eating or drinking establishments, including but not limited to a restaurant, hotel, cafe, cafeteria, bar, or other public place where food or drinks are sold, served, or offered for sale, are prohibited from providing drinking water to any person unless expressly requested.

9. Commercial Lodging Establishments Must Provide Guests Option to Decline Daily Linen Services: Hotels, motels and other commercial lodging establishments must provide customers the option of not having towels and linen laundered dally. Commercial lodging establishments must prominently display notice of this option in each bathroom using clear and easily understood language .

10. No Installation of Single Pass Cooling Systems: Installation of single pass cooling systems is prohibited in buildings requesting new water service.

11. No Installation of Non-re-clrculatlng in Commercial Car Wash and Laundry Systems: Installation of non-re-circulating water systems Is prohibited in new commercial conveyor car wash and new commercial laundry systems.

12. Restaurants Required to Use Water Conserving Dish Wash Spray Valves:

Food preparation establishments, such as restaurants or cafes, are prohibited from using non-water conserving dish wash spray valves.

13. Commercial Car Wash Systems: Effective on January 1, 2010 all commercial conveyor car wash systems must have installed operational recirculating water systems, or must have secured a waiver of this requirement from the City of San Jacinto.

Level 1 Water Supply Shortage

1. A Level 1 Water Supply Shortage exists when the City Manager of the City of San Jacinto determines, In his/her sole discretion, that due to drought or other water supply conditions, a water supply shortage or threatened shortage exists and a consumer demand reduction Is necessary to make more efficient use of water and appropriately respond to existing water conditions. Upon the declaration by the City of San Jacinto of a Level 1 Water Supply Shortage condition, the City of San Jacinto will implement the mandatory Level 1 conservation measures identified in this section.

2. Additional Water Conse~ation Measures: In addition to the prohibited uses of water identified in Section E, the following water conservation requirements apply during a declared Level 1 Water Supply Shortage:
a. Limits on Watering Days: Watering or Irrigating of lawn, landscape or other vegetated area with potable water is limited to three days per week on a schedule established and posted by the City of San Jacinto.

During the months of November through March, watering or irrigating of lawn, landscape or other vegetated area with potable water is limited to no more than one day per week on a schedule establlshed and posted by the City of San Jacinto. This provision does not apply to landscape irrigation zones that exclusively use very low flow drip type Irrigation systems when no emitter produces more than two (2) gallons of water per hour. This provision also does not apply to watering or irrigating by use of a hand- )
held bucket or similar container, a hand-held hose equipped with a positive self-closing water shut-off nozzle or device, or for very short periods of time for the express purpose of adjusting or repairing an irrigation system.
b. Obligation lo Fix Leaks Breaks or Malfunctions: All leaks, breaks, or other malfunctions in the water user's plumbing or distribution system must be repaired within seventy-two (72) hours of notification by the City of San Jacinto unless other arrangements are made with the City of San Jacinto.

G. Level 2 Water Supply Shortage

1. A Level 2 Water Supply Shortage exists when the City Manager of the City of San Jacinto detennines, in his/her sole discretion, that due to drought or other water supply conditions, a water supply shortage or threatened shortage exists and a consumer demand reduction is necessary to make more efficient use of water and appropriately respond to existing water conditions. Upon the declaration by the City of San Jacinto of a Level 2 Water Supply Shortage condition, the City of San Jacinto will implement the mandatory Level 2 conservation measures identified in this seciion.

2. Additional Conservation Measures: In addition to the prohibited uses of water identified in Section E and F the following additional water conservation requirements apply during a declared Level 2 Water Supply Shortage:
a. Watering Days: Watering or irrigating of lawn, landscape or other vegetated area with potable water is limited to two days per week on a schedule established and posted by the City of San Jacinto. During the months of November through March, watering or irrigating of lawn, landscape or other vegetated area with potable water is limited to no more than one day per week on a schedule established and posted by the City of San Jacinto. This provision does not apply to landscape irrigation zones that exclusively use very low flow drip type irrigation systems when no emitter produces more than two (2) gallons of water per hour. This provision also does not apply to watering or irrigating by use of a handheld bucket or similar container, a hand-held hose equipped with a positive self-closing water shut-off nozzle or device, or for very short periods of time for the express purpose of adjusting or repairing an Irrigation system.
b. Obligation to Fix Leaks, Breaks or Malfunctions: All leaks, breaks, or other malfunctions in the water user's plumbing or distribution system must be repaired within forty-eight (48) hours of notification by the City of San Jacinto unless other arrangements are made with the City of San Jacinto.

H.
)
c. Limits on Filling Ornamental Lakes or Ponds: Filling or re-filling ornamental lakes or ponds is prohibited, except to the extent needed to sustain aquatic life. provided that such animals are of significant value and have been actively managed within the water feature prior to declaration of a supply shortage level under this ordinance.
d. Limits on Washing Vehicles: Using water to wash or clean a vehicle, including but not limited to, any automobile, truck, van, bus, motorcycle, boat or trailer, whether motorized or not, is prohibited except by use of a hand-held bucket or similar container, a hand•held hose equipped with a positive self-closing water shut-off nozzle or device, by high pressure/low volume wash systems. or at a commercial car washing facility that utilizes a re-circulating water system to capture or reuse water.
e. Limits on Filling Residential Swimming Pools & Spas: Re-filling of more than one foot and Initial filling of residential swimming pools or outdoor spas with potable water is prohibited.

Level 3 Water Supply Shortage - Emergency Condition

1. A Level 3 Water Supply Shortage condition Is also referred to as an "Emergency" condition. A Level 3 condition exists when the City Manager of the of City of San Jacinto declares a water shortage emergency and notifies its residents and businesses that a significant reduction in consumer demand is necessary to maintain sufficient water supplies for public health and safety.

Upon the declaration of a Level 3 Water Supply Shortage condition, the City of San Jacinto will implement the mandatory Level 3 conservation measures identified in this section.

2. Additional Conservation Measures: In addition to the prohibited uses of water identified in Section E, F, and G, the following water conservation requirements apply during a declared Level 3 Water Supply Shortage Emergency:
a. No Watering or lnigating: Watering or irrigating of lawn, landscape or other vegetated area with potable water Is prohibited. This restriction does not apply to the following categories of use, unless the City of San Jacinto has detennined that recycled water Is avaltable and may be applied to the use:
(1) Maintenance of vegetation, including trees and shrubs, that are watered using a hand-held bucket or similar container, handheld hose equipped with a positive self-closing water shut-off nozzJe or device;
(2) Maintenance of existing landscape necessary for fire protection;
)
(3) Maintenance of existing landscape for soll erosion control; ( 4) Maintenance of plant materials Identified to be rare or. essential to the well-being of protected species;
(5) Maintenance of landscape within active public parks and playing fields. day care centers, golf course greens, and school grounds, provided that such irrigation does not exceed two (2) days perweek.
(6) Actively irrigated environmental mitigation projects. b. Obligation to Fix Leaks, Breaks or Malfunctions: AH leaks, breaks. or other matfunctlons In the water user's plumbing or distributlon system must be repaired within twenty four (24) hours of notification by the City of San Jacinto unless other arrangements are made with the City of San Jacinto.
c. No New Potable Water Service: Upon declaration of a Level 3 Water Supply Shortage Emergency condition, no new potable water service will be provided. no new temporary meters or permanent meters will be provided, and no statements of immediate ability to serve or provide potable water service (such as. will-serve letters, certificates, or letters of availability) will be issued. except under the following circumstances:
(1) A valid, unexpired building permit has been issued for the project; or
(2) The project Is necessary to protect the publlc health. safety. and welfare; or
(3) The applicant provides substantial evidence of an
enforceable commitment that water demands for the project will be offset prior to the provision of a new water meter( s} to the satisfaction of the City of San Jacinto.

This provision does not predude the resetting or tum-on of meters to provide continuation of water service or the restoration of service that has been interrupted for a period of one year or less. d. Limits on BuUdlng Permits: The City of San Jacinto will limit or withhold the issuance of building permits which require new or expanded water service, except to protect the public health, safety and welfare, or In cases which meet the City of San Jacinto's adopted conservation offset requirements.
e. Discontinue Service: The City of San Jacintot in its sole discretion, may discontinue service to consumers who willfully violate provisions of this sectlon.
f. No New Annexations: Upon the declaration of a Level 3 Water Supply Shortage condition, the City of San Jacinto will suspend consideration of annexations to its service area. This subsection does not apply to boundary corrections and annexations that will not result In any Increased use of water.

I. Procedures for Determination/ Notification of Water Supply Shortage

1. Declaration and Notification of Water Supply Shortage: The existence of Level 1, level 2 or Level 3 Water Suppfy Shortage conditions may be declared by resolution of the City of San Jacinto adopted at a regular or special public meeting held In accordance with State law. The mandatory conservation requirements applicable to Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 conditions will take effect on the tenth day after the date the shortage level is declared.

Within five (5) days following the declaration of the shortage level, the City of San Jacinto must publish a copy of the resolution in a newspaper used for publication of official notices. If the City of San Jacinto activates a water al,ocation process, it must provide notice of the activation by inctuding It In the regular blllfng statement or by any other mailing to the address to which the City of San Jacinto customarily mails the billing statement for fees or charges for on-going water service. A water allocation will be effective on the fifth day following the date of mailing or at such later date as specified in the notice.

2. Mandatory Percentage Use Reductions: During a Level 3 Water Supply Shortage condition, all customers will be required to reduce water consumption by a percentage determined by the City Manager of the City of San Jacinto.

J. Hardship Waiver

1. Undue and Disproportionate Hardship: If. due to unique circumstances, a specific requirement of this chapter wouk:t result In undue hardship to a person using water or to property upon which water is used, that ls dlsproportionate to the impacts to water users generally or to similar property or classes of water users, then the person may apply for a waiver to the requirements as provided in this section,

2. Written Finding: The waiver may be granted or conditionally granted only upon a written finding of the existence of facts demonstrating an undue hardship to a person using water or to property upon which water Is used, that is disproportionate to the Impacts to water users generally or to similar property or classes of water use due to specific and unique circumstances of the user or the user's property.

K.
a. Application: Application for a waiver must be on a form prescribed by the City of San Jacinto and accompanied by a non-refundable processing fee set by the fee schedule of the City of San Jacinto. b. Supporting Documentation: The application must be accompanied by photographs, maps, drawings, and other information, Including a written statement of the applicant.
c. Required Findings for Waiver: An application for a waiver will be denied unless the City of San Jacinto finds, based on the Information provided in the application, supporting documents, or such additional Information as may be requested, and on water use lnfonnation for the property as shown by the records of the City of San Jacinto or its Agent, all of the following:
(1) That the waiver does not constitute a grant of special privilege Inconsistent With the limitations upon other residents and businesses;
(2) That because of special circumstances applicable to the property or its use, the strid application of this chapter would have a disproportionate Impact on the property or use that exceeds the lmpads to residents and businesses generally;
(3) That the authorizing of such waiver will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent properties, and will not materially affect the ability of the City of San Jacinto to effectuate the purpose of this chapter and will not be detrimental to the public interest; and (4) That the condition or situation of the subject property or the intended use of the property for which the waiver is sought Is not common, recurrent or general in nature.

3. Approval Authority: The Finance Director, or appointed designee must act upon any completed application no later than ten (10) days after submittal and may approve, conditionally approve, or deny the waiver. The applicant requesting the waiver must be promptly notified in writing of any action taken. Unless specified otherwise at the time a waiver is approved, the waiver wlll apply too the subject property during the period of the mandatory water supply shortage condition. The decision of the Finance Director, or appointed deslgnee Is final.

Penalties and V10lations

1. Misdemeanor: Any violation of this section may be prosecuted as a misdemeanor punishable by Imprisonment In the county jail for not more than thirty (30) days, or by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000), or by both.

2. Penalties: Penalties for failure to comply with any provisions of the section are as follows:
a. First Violation: The City of San Jacinto will issue a written warning and deliver a copy of this section by mall.
b. Second Violation: A second violation within the preceding twelve (12) calendar months is punishable by a fine not to exceed twenty five dollars ($25) ..
c. Third Violatlon: A third violation within the preceding twelve (12) calendar months is punishable by a fine not to exceed one hundred dollars ($100).
d. Fourth and Subsequent Violations: A fourth and any subsequent violation is punishable by a fine not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500). (1) Water Flow Restrictor. In addition to any Hnes, the City of San Jacinto may Install a water flow restrictor device of approximately one gallon per minute capacity for services up to one and one-half Inch size and comparatively slzed restrictors for larger services after written notice of Intent to install a flow restrictor for a minimum of forty eight (48) hours.
e. Discontinuing Service: In addition to any fines and the Installation of a water flow restrictor, the City of San Jacinto may disconnect a customer's water service for willful violations of this section and adequate notice to the customer.

3. Cost of Flow Restrictor and Disconnecting Service: A person or City of San Jacinto that violates this ordinance Is responsible for payment of the City of San Jacinto's charges for installing and/or removing any flow restricting device and for disconnecting and/or reconnecting service per the City of San Jacinta's schedule of charges then in effect. The charge for Installing and/or removing any flow restricting device must be paid to the CHy of San Jacinto before the device is removed. Nonpayment will be subject to the same remedies as nonpayment of basic water rates.

4. Separate Offenses: Each day that a violation of this ordinance occurs is a separate offense.

5. Notice and Hearing:
a. The City of San Jacinto will issue a Notice of V10lation by mall or personal delivery at least ten (10) days before taking enforcement action.

Such notice must describe the violation and the date by which corrective action must be taken. A customer may appeal the Notice of VlOlation by filing a written notice of appeal wtth the City of San Jacinto no later than . .
the close of business on the day before the date scheduled for enforcement action. Any Notice of Violation not timely appealed will be final. Upon receipt of a timely appeal, a hearing on the appeal will be scheduled, and the City of San Jacinto will mail written notice of the hearing date to the customer at least ten (10) days before the date of the hearing.
b. Pending receipt of a written appeal or pending a hearing pursuant to an appeal, the City of San Jacinto may take appropriate steps to prevent the unauthorized use of water as appropriate to the nature and extent of the vtolations and the current declared water Level condition.

L. Severabtlity
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase in this section Is for any reason held invalkl, the validity of the remainder of the chapter wUI not be affected. The City Council of the City of San Jacinto hereby declares it would have passed this chapter and each section. subsection. sentence, clause or phrase thereof, Irrespective of the fact that one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases or Is declared Invalid."
Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day (30th) day from and after its second reading.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 21111 day of May, 2009, by the following vote:

Ayres, Di Memmo, Mansperger, Potts, Stubblefield
None
None
None
t)~
By DaleSti.itiiii,tyo,
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Best Best & Krieger LLP
~~~ciiy',;'ttorney
. - .
.
.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIOE)ss

CITY OF SAN JACINTO )

CERTIFICATION
I. Barry McClellan. City Clerk hereby certify that the attached Is a true copy of Ordinance No. 09-16 introduced by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, at a regular meeting held the 7tti day of May, 2009. Ordinance 09-16 was approved. passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the San Jacinto City Council held the 21 st day of May, 2009.

WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Jacinto this 22nd day of May, 2009.

City of San Jacinto
vaA- ~ ellan, City Clerk

CITY OF SAN JACINTO
2025 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN

APPENDIX I
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE’S MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL

LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
jv|u{GvmGyp}lyzpklG
vwlyh{pvuhsGhylhG
tTqG
sGo¡GtGw
h YWYZ
}G\UXUY\
iGiSGk
j Gy l GtG
k OltkP
County of Riverside Operational AreaMulti-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 2 | PrefixContact Information Name: Title:Address:PhoneEmail:

Branden Boyd Emergency Management Program Supervisor, County of Riverside EMD450 E. Alessandro BlvdRiverside, CA 92508 (951) 470-5392 [email protected] Name: Title:Address:City, State, and Zip: Office:Email:

Mary Valterria Administrative Services Analyst II, County of Riverside EMD 450 E. Alessandro Blvd
Riverside, CA 92508 (951) 470-9297 [email protected]

County of Riverside Operational Area
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 3 | PrefixExecutive Summary The purpose of the County of Riverside Operational Area Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (MJLHMP), also known as the Base Plan, is to identify the County’s hazards, review and assess past disaster occurrences, estimate the probability of future occurrences, and set goals to mitigate potential risks to reduce or eliminate longterm risk to people and property from natural and human-caused hazards. The MJLHMP was prepared pursuant to the requirements of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 to achieve eligibility and potentially secure mitigation funding through Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Mitigation Assistance, Pre-Disaster Mitigation, and Hazard Mitigation Grant Programs. Riverside County's continual efforts to maintain a disaster-mitigation strategy is on-going. Our goal is to develop and maintain an all-inclusive plan to include all jurisdictions, special districts, businesses, and community organizations and to promote consistency, continuity, and unification. The County’s planning process followed a methodology presented by FEMA and CalOES which included conducting meetings with the Operational Area Planning Committee (OAPC) coordinated by County of Riverside Emergency Management Department (EMD) comprised of participating Federal, State, and local jurisdictions agencies, special districts, school districts, non-profit communities, universities, businesses, Tribal Leaders, and Healthcare Facilities. The MJLHMP identifies vulnerabilities, provides recommendations for prioritized mitigation actions, evaluates resources, and identifies mitigation shortcomings, provides future mitigation planning and maintenance of existing plan.

County of Riverside Operational AreaMulti-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 4 | PrefixPlan Adoption/Resolution The County and its participating jurisdictions will submit plans to Cal OES for a 45-day joint review with FEMA and will adhere to the recommended process. In addition, the County and its participants will wait to receive an “Approval Pending Adoption” before taking the plan to the local governing bodies for adoption. Upon approval, County and participating jurisdictions will insert signed resolutions. (See Appendix A for Draft Resolution) County of Riverside Operational Area
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 5 | PrefixAcknowledgments County Board of Supervisors: District 1 – Kevin Jeffries District 2 – Karen Spiegel District 3 – Chuck Washington District 4 – Manuel Perez District 5 – Yxstian Gutierrez EMD Planning Team: Brian MacGavin, Program Director Jennifer Smith, Emergency Management Program Supervisor (EMPS) William Luna, Emergency Services Coordinator Eric Cadden, EMPS Michael Ornelas, EMPS Catherine Farrokhi, Supervising Research Specialist Mary Valterria, Administrative Services Analyst II Shane Reichardt, Senior Public Information Specialist Support Staff: Moses Martinez, Senior GIS Specialist Marlene Lopez, Office Assistant II Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Steering Committee (OAPC) Representatives from county departments and political subdivisions within the county area. Jurisdictional Participation Special thanks to the participating local jurisdictions and special districts for collecting and compiling historical disaster information, providing area hazard identification summaries and completing their stand-alone local hazard mitigation plans. The local hazard assessments and insight are very instrumental to incorporate mitigation actions into the MJLHMP.

County of Riverside Operational AreaMulti-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 6 | PrefixTable of Contents Contact Information ........................................................................................................... 2Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 3Plan Adoption/Resolution ................................................................................................... 4Acknowledgments .............................................................................................................. 5Table of Contents ............................................................................................................... 6List of Tables ................................................................................................................... 12List of Figures .................................................................................................................. 15List of Maps ..................................................................................................................... 162023 MJLHMP Participants and Prospective Annexes ........................................................... 19List of Appendices ............................................................................................................ 20Section 1.0 – Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan .............................................. 22

1.1 Plan Description ......................................................................................................................... 22

1.2 Purpose of Plan and Authority ................................................................................................... 22 1.3 Grant Programs with Mitigation Plan Requirements ............................................................... 23

1.4 History of Multi-Jurisdictional Participants ............................................................................... 27 Section 2.0 – Community Profile ........................................................................................ 29

2.1 History............................................................................................................................................... 29

2.2 Geography and Climate .................................................................................................................... 30 2.3 Population Trends ............................................................................................................................ 35 2.4 Economy ........................................................................................................................................... 40 2.5 Land Use and Development Trends ................................................................................................. 48 2.6 Cities of Riverside County ................................................................................................................ 54

2.6.1 Banning ...................................................................................................................................... 54 2.6.2 Beaumont .................................................................................................................................. 55 2.6.3 Blythe ......................................................................................................................................... 55 2.6.4 Calimesa ..................................................................................................................................... 56 County of Riverside Operational Area
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 7 | Prefix

2.6.5 Canyon Lake............................................................................................................................... 57 2.6.6 Cathedral City ............................................................................................................................ 57

2.6.7 Coachella ................................................................................................................................... 58

2.6.8 Corona ....................................................................................................................................... 59

2.6.9 Desert Hot Springs ..................................................................................................................... 62 2.6.10 Eastvale .................................................................................................................................... 63 2.6.11 Hemet ...................................................................................................................................... 64 2.6.12 Indian Wells ............................................................................................................................. 64 2.6.13 Indio ......................................................................................................................................... 65 2.6.14 Jurupa Valley ........................................................................................................................... 662.6.15 Lake Elsinore ............................................................................................................................ 66

2.6.16 La Quinta ................................................................................................................................. 67

2.6.17 Menifee ................................................................................................................................... 68

2.6.18 Moreno Valley ......................................................................................................................... 68 2.6.19 Murrieta ................................................................................................................................... 68 2.6.20 Norco ....................................................................................................................................... 69 2.6.21 Palm Desert ............................................................................................................................. 72 2.6.22 Palm Springs ............................................................................................................................ 72 2.6.23 Perris ........................................................................................................................................ 74 2.6.24 Rancho Mirage ........................................................................................................................ 75 2.6.25 Riverside .................................................................................................................................. 78

2.6.26 San Jacinto ............................................................................................................................... 78 2.6.27 Temecula ................................................................................................................................. 79 2.6.28 Wildomar ................................................................................................................................. 80

2.7 Tribes of Riverside County ............................................................................................................... 81

2.7.1 Agua Caliente Indian Reservation............................................................................................. 81 2.7.2 Augustine Indian Reservation ................................................................................................... 81 2.7.3 Cabazon Indian Reservation ..................................................................................................... 81 2.7.4 Cahuilla Indian Reservation ...................................................................................................... 82 2.7.5 Colorado River Indian Reservation ........................................................................................... 82 2.7.6 Morongo .................................................................................................................................... 82 County of Riverside Operational AreaMulti-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 8 | Prefix

2.7.7 Pechanga Indian Reservation.................................................................................................... 83 2.7.8 Ramona Band of Cahuilla .......................................................................................................... 83 2.7.9 Santa Rosa Indian Reservation ................................................................................................. 84 2.7.10 Soboba Band of Mission Indians............................................................................................. 85 2.7.11 Torres-Martinez Indian Reservation (partly in Imperial County, California) ........................ 85 2.7.12 Twenty-Nine Palms Indian Reservation (partly in San Bernardino County) ......................... 85 Section 3.0 - The Planning Process ..................................................................................... 87

3.1 Planning Process Overview .............................................................................................................. 87 3.2 Hazard Mitigation 2023 Planning .................................................................................................... 88 3.3 2023 MJLHMP Update Process / LHMP Tools ................................................................................. 88

3.4 Operational Area Planning Process ................................................................................................. 90 3.5 EMD Planning Team ......................................................................................................................... 91 3.6 MJLHMP Steering Committee .......................................................................................................... 93 3.7 Public Outreach ................................................................................................................................ 93

3.7.1 Hazard Mitigation Meetings ..................................................................................................... 99

3.8 Existing Plans and Studies .............................................................................................................. 104 Section 4.0 – Updates and Mitigation Actions.................................................................... 106

4.1 Updates to 2023 MJLHMP Plan ...................................................................................................... 106 4.2 Hazard Updates .............................................................................................................................. 107 4.3 Mitigation Actions and Updates .................................................................................................... 109

4.3.1 2018 Plan Mitigation Actions (Historical Reference) ............................................................. 109 4.3.2 Prioritization Process .............................................................................................................. 129

4.4 Critical Facilities and Infrastructures ............................................................................................. 145

4.4.1 Mitigation Goals and Strategies Relating to Critical Facilities ............................................... 153 4.4.2 Loss Factors ............................................................................................................................. 155 4.4.4 Critical Infrastructures Maps .................................................................................................. 158

4.5 Estimated Property Loss ................................................................................................................ 165 Section 5.0 – Risk Assessment ......................................................................................... 168

5.1 Overview and Risk Assessment Process ........................................................................................ 168

5.1.1 Results and Methodology ....................................................................................................... 169 County of Riverside Operational Area
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 9 | Prefix

5.2 Consequence Analysis .................................................................................................................... 170 5.3 Hazard Profiles and Descriptions ................................................................................................... 176

5.3.1 Earthquake .............................................................................................................................. 177 5.3.2 Pandemic ................................................................................................................................. 209

5.3.3 Wildland Fire ........................................................................................................................... 214

5.3.4 Electrical Failure – Power Outage ........................................................................................... 230 5.3.5 Emerging Re-Emerging Infectious Diseases ............................................................................ 237 5.3.6 Cyber Attack ............................................................................................................................ 242 5.3.7 Terrorist Event ......................................................................................................................... 245 5.3.8 Communications Failure ......................................................................................................... 248 5.3.9 Flood ........................................................................................................................................ 255 5.3.10 Civil Disorder ......................................................................................................................... 282 5.3.11 Drought .................................................................................................................................. 284 5.3.12 Nuclear/Radiological Incident .............................................................................................. 294 5.3.13 Extreme Weather .................................................................................................................. 298 5.3.13.1 Extreme Heat ...................................................................................................................... 302 5.3.13.2 Severe Cold ......................................................................................................................... 310 5.3.13.3 Wind Event ......................................................................................................................... 312 5.3.13.4 Fog Event ............................................................................................................................ 317 5.3.13.5 Agricultural Event ............................................................................................................... 317 5.3.14 Transportation Failure .......................................................................................................... 329 5.3.15 Dam Failure ........................................................................................................................... 334 5.3.16 Aqueduct Failure ................................................................................................................... 342 5.3.17 Tornado ................................................................................................................................. 345

5.3.18 Insect Infestation ................................................................................................................... 351 5.3.19 Jail/Prison Event .................................................................................................................... 357 5.3.20 Pipeline Disruption ................................................................................................................ 360 5.3.21 Landslide ................................................................................................................................ 364 5.3.22 Hazardous Materials Incident ............................................................................................... 371 5.3.23 Water Supply Disruption/Contamination ............................................................................ 377 Section 6.0 National Flood Insurance Program .................................................................. 381 County of Riverside Operational AreaMulti-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 10 | Prefix

6.1 Community Rating System ............................................................................................................. 383 6.2 Repetitive Loss Properties ............................................................................................................. 385 Section 7.0 – Capabilities Assessment............................................................................... 387

7.1 Regulatory Mitigation Table .......................................................................................................... 387 7.2 Administrative/Technical Mitigation Table .................................................................................. 389 7.3 Fiscal Mitigation Capabilities ......................................................................................................... 391 7.4 Funding Opportunities ................................................................................................................... 392 7.5 Mitigation Outreach and Partnerships .......................................................................................... 396 7.5.1 Opportunities for Enhancement to Capabilities ........................................................................ 398 Section 8.0 – Goals and Strategies.................................................................................... 402

8.1 Goals and Objectives ...................................................................................................................... 402 8.2 Prioritizing Strategies ..................................................................................................................... 403 8.3 Future and Current Mitigation Strategies ..................................................................................... 403 8.4 On-going Mitigation Strategies ...................................................................................................... 411

8.4.1 Earthquake Strategies ............................................................................................................. 411 8.4.2 Flood Strategies ....................................................................................................................... 412 8.4.3 Fire Strategies .......................................................................................................................... 414

8.4.4 All Hazard Strategies ............................................................................................................... 415

8.5 Mitigation Actions .......................................................................................................................... 416 Section 9.0 Plan Implementation and Maintenance Process................................................ 418

9.1 Implementation .............................................................................................................................. 418 9.2 Role of MJLHMP Steering Committee ........................................................................................... 419 9.3 Incorporation into Existing Planning Mechanisms ........................................................................ 419 9.4 Maintenance Updates and Record of Changes ............................................................................. 421

10.0 Continued Public Involvement .................................................................................. 424APPENDIX A – Resolution Draft ........................................................................................ 426APPENDIX B – Participating Jurisdictions Contact Information Provided Upon Request .......... 429APPENDIX C – Public Outreach Presentations and Meetings................................................ 578 County of Riverside Operational Area
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 11 | PrefixAPPENDIX D – Inventory Template ................................................................................... 753APPENDIX E – Critical Facilities......................................................................................... 762APPENDIX F – Historical Landmarks .................................................................................. 763APPENDIX G – Trends Questionnaire ................................................................................ 771APPENDIX H – Mitigation Cost Analysis Guidelines ............................................................. 775APPENDIX I – References ................................................................................................ 778Appendix J – City of Menifee LHMP .................................................................................. 784Appendix K - Acronyms ................................................................................................... 786 County of Riverside Operational AreaMulti-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 12 | PrefixList of Tables Table 1: Participants and Prospective Annexes ........................................................................19Table 2: Riverside County Climate ............................................................................................32 Table 3: Unincorporated Area Population ..................................................................................36 Table 4: Historical Population Estimates for Riverside County Cities ........................................37Table 5: Riverside County Population Change (2010-2034) ......................................................39Table 6: Employment Growth Projections of Riverside and San Bernardino County .................45Table 7: Housing Projections by City .........................................................................................52 Table 8: Presentations and Meetings ........................................................................................99Table 9: Participant Meetings .................................................................................................. 101 Table 10: Hazard Identification ................................................................................................ 107Table 11: 2018 Plan Mitigation Actions ................................................................................... 109Table 12: 2023 MJLHMP Mitigation Actions ............................................................................ 130Table 13: Critical Facilities ...................................................................................................... 145 Table 14: Riverside County Capital Asset ............................................................................... 147Table 15: Riverside County Communications Infrastructure Facilities ..................................... 148Table 16: Riverside County Public Safety Enterprise Communications System Radio Locations ............................................................................................................................................... 149Table 17: Disaster Incidents, Casualties, and Cost by Type .................................................... 156Table 18: Riverside County Property Values by City ............................................................... 165Table 19: Unincorporated Riverside County Property Values .................................................. 166Table 20: 2018 and 2023 MJLHMP Update Participant Ranking Chart Template .................... 171Table 21: Jurisdictional Vulnerability Worksheet ..................................................................... 172 County of Riverside Operational Area
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 13 | PrefixTable 22: 2023 MJLHMP Top Five Identified Hazards ............................................................ 173Table 23: Historical Earthquakes in California - 5.0 and Above that may have impacted Riverside County .................................................................................................................................... 178Table 24: Chances of Significant Earthquakes on Major Faults in Riverside County ............... 181Table 25: Earthquake Magnitude, Intensity Measurements, and Intensity Characteristics ....... 182Table 26: Summary of HAZUS Estimated Impacts on Riverside County for the Earthquake Scenario from 2008 ................................................................................................................. 195Table 27: Summary of HAZUS – Estimated Impacts for Riverside County Essential Facilities in Two Earthquake Scenarios ..................................................................................................... 196 Table 28: Summary of HAZUS – Estimated Impacts for Riverside County Due to an M7.8 Scenario Earthquake on the Shakeout San Andreas Fault ..................................................................... 200 Table 29: Riverside County Essential Facility Loss Estimates – M7.8 “Shakeout” San Andreas Fault Scenario Earthquake ...................................................................................................... 204 Table 30: Riverside County Large Fires 500 Acres and Greater (2008-2019) ......................... 221Table 31: Large Wildland Incidents within Riverside to include Local and State Incidents ....... 222Table 32: Riverside County Power Outages (1993-2021) ....................................................... 233Table 33: Riverside County Flood History ............................................................................... 260Table 34: FIRM Flood Zones Table 34: FIRM Flood Zones ..................................................... 265Table 35: Flood Insurance Study Areas .................................................................................. 266Table 36: Summary of HAZUS – Estimated Impacts on Riverside County for Three Flood Scenarios ................................................................................................................................ 272 Table 37: Summary of HAZUS – Estimated Impacts for Riverside County Essential Facilities in Three Flood Scenarios ............................................................................................................ 273Table 38: Riverside County Essential Facilities Loss Estimates – 0.2 Percent Annual Chance Flood Scenario ........................................................................................................................ 275 Table 39: Estimated Impacts on Riverside County Fire Stations in a 1 Percent Annual Chance Flood Scenario ........................................................................................................................ 276 County of Riverside Operational AreaMulti-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 14 | PrefixTable 40: Estimated Impacts on Riverside County EOCs in a 0.2 Percent Annual Chance Flood (Levees Intact) Scenario ......................................................................................................... 277Table 41: Estimated Impacts on Riverside County Police Facilities in a 0.2 Percent Annual Chance Flood (Levees Intact) Scenario .................................................................................. 277Table 42: Estimated Impacts on Riverside School Districts in a 0.2 Percent Annual Chance Flood Scenario.................................................................................................................................. 278 Table 43: Estimated Impacts on Riverside County Hospitals in a 0.2 Percent Annual Chance Flood Scenario ........................................................................................................................ 279 Table 44: Storm Data (4/30/1950 to 8/31/2022) ...................................................................... 299Table 45: Riverside Climate .................................................................................................... 301 Table 46: Idyllwild Climate ...................................................................................................... 301Table 47: Blythe Climate ......................................................................................................... 302Table 48: The National Weather Service (NWS) Heat Index ................................................... 303Table 49: 1991 - 2020 Heat Deaths in California ..................................................................... 309Table 50: Agriculture-related disasters in Riverside County .................................................... 320 Table 51: Primary Crop-related Insect Infestations for Riverside County ................................. 325Table 52: Dams within the County of Riverside ....................................................................... 337Table 53: Fujita Tornado Damage Scale ................................................................................. 346Table 54: Historical Tornados Statistics for Riverside.............................................................. 348Table 55: Example Insect Species .......................................................................................... 353Table 56: History of Hazmat Incidents in 2021/2022 ............................................................... 373Table 57: Jurisdictions and Authorities Participating with National Flood Insurance Program.. 382 Table 58: Community Rating System Eligible Communities .................................................... 384Table 59: Riverside County Repetitive Loss Properties ........................................................... 385Table 60: Regulatory Tools ..................................................................................................... 387 County of Riverside Operational Area
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 15 | PrefixTable 61: Administrative/Technical Mitigation Tools ................................................................ 389Table 62: Fiscal Mitigation Capabilities ................................................................................... 391Table 63: Grant Funding Opportunities for Mitigation .............................................................. 392List of Figures Figure 1: East County Average Annual Temperature ...............................................................33Figure 2: West County Average Annual Temperature ...............................................................34Figure 3: Riverside County Population Growth - 2009 – 2019 ...................................................38Figure 4: Riverside County Economic and Labor Force Characteristics ....................................42Figure 5: Annual Labor Force and Employment Averages ........................................................43 Figure 6: County of Riverside Major Employers ........................................................................44Figure 7: Land Use Designation Key .........................................................................................48Figure 8: Housing and Household Characteristics .....................................................................51 Figure 9: County of Riverside Emergency Management Department Planning Team Organizational Chart .................................................................................................................92Figure 10: EMD LHMP Website ................................................................................................94Figure 11: Twitter Post ..............................................................................................................95Figure 12: LHMP English Postcard Side 1 ................................................................................96Figure 13: LHMP English Postcard Side 2 ................................................................................96Figure 14: LHMP Spanish Postcard Side 1 ...............................................................................97Figure 15: LHMP Spanish Postcard Side 2 ...............................................................................97Figure 16: Outreach Public Comment Flyer ..............................................................................98Figure 17: Riverside County FY Capital Assets ....................................................................... 144Figure 18: Summary of HAZUS – estimated Impacts for Riverside County in 2021 7.8 Shakeout Full Scenario ........................................................................................................................... 197 County of Riverside Operational AreaMulti-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 16 | PrefixFigure 19: Summary of HAZUS – estimated Impacts for Riverside in 2021 7.1 San Andreas (Coachella) Scenario............................................................................................................... 198 Figure 20: Direct Economic Loss in Riverside County Resulting from an M7.8 Scenario Earthquake on the “Shakeout” San Andreas Fault .................................................................. 201 Figure 21: California COVID-19 Update for December 8, 2022 ............................................... 212Figure 22: National Risk Index Score distribution .................................................................... 227Figure 23: Lumen Internet, ATT Hub Image ............................................................................ 249Figure 24: PSEC System Architecture .................................................................................... 251Figure 25: California’s drought level the month of November 2017-2020 ................................ 287Figure 26: California’s drought level November 2021-2022 ..................................................... 287Figure 27: April Snow Water Equivalence in the Southern Sierra 1950-2099 .......................... 290Figure 28: U.S Drought Monitor – California Compared - November 2022 and January 2023 . 292 Figure 29: Historic and Projected Extreme Heat Days, 1950 to 2099 ...................................... 304 Figure 30: Average Annual Maximum Temperatures in Riverside County ............................... 305Figure 31: Top Commodities ................................................................................................... 319 Figure 32: 2020 Pest Interceptions Chart ................................................................................ 326Figure 33: California Gas Lines ...............................................................................................361 List of Maps Map 1: Riverside County Supervisor Districts ...........................................................................47Map 21: Eastern Riverside County Wildfire Susceptibility Risks Map ...................................... 226Map 3: PSEC Sites and Microwave Interconnectivity across 7200 Square miles of Riverside County, CA ............................................................................................................................. 252 Map 4: FEMA FIRM Map 2022 – West County........................................................................ 263 County of Riverside Operational Area
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 17 | PrefixMap 5: FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map ............................................................................... 268Map 6: Local Studies Floodplain Map ..................................................................................... 270Map 7: Riverside County Surface Materials ............................................................................ 369Map 8: Riverside County Slope Instability Map ....................................................................... 370Map 39: Hazardous Material Facilities within the OA…………………………………….374 Map 40: Water Systems in Riverside County……………………………………………..376

County of Riverside Operational AreaMulti-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation PlanApril 2023EMD 5.1.25 18 | Prefix

This page intentionally left blank.

County of Riverside Operational Area
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 19 | Prefix2023 MJLHMP Participants and Prospective Annexes Table 1: Participants and Prospective Annexes City Jurisdictions Tribes
City of Banning Morongo Band of Mission Indians City of Beaumont Twenty-nine Palms Band of Mission Indians City of Blythe City of Calimesa City of Canyon Lake City of Cathedral – Dropped Out School Districts & Special DistrictsCity of Coachella Beaumont Unified School District City of Corona Desert Healthcare District & Foundation City of Desert Hot Springs Hemet Unified School District City of Eastvale High Valley Water District City of Hemet Idyllwild Fire Protection District City of Indian Wells Imperial Irrigation District City of Indio Moreno Valley Unified School District City of Jurupa Valley Perris Union High School District City of La Quinta Rancho California Water District City of Lake Elsinore Riverside County Office of Education City of Menifee (Appendix L) San Jacinto Unified School District City of Moreno Valley Western Municipal Water District City of Murrieta City of Norco *Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District
City of Palm Desert City of Palm Springs City of Perris City of Rancho Mirage City of Riverside City of San Jacinto City of Temecula City of Wildomar *Considered a Riverside County Department
County of Riverside Operational AreaMulti-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 20 | PrefixList of Appendices APPENDIX A – Resolution Draft APPENDIX B – Participating Jurisdictions and Letters of Commitment APPENDIX C – Public Outreach Meetings APPENDIX D – Inventory Template APPENDIX E – Critical Facilities APPENDIX F – Historical Landmarks APPENDIX G – Trends Questionnaire
APPENDIX H – Mitigation Cost Analysis Guidelines
APPENDIX I – References
APPENDIX J – City of Menifee LHMP
APPENDIX K – Acronyms
County of Riverside Operational Area
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation PlanApril 2023EMD 5.1.25 21 This page intentionally left blank.

County of Riverside Operational AreaMulti-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 22 | Section 1Section 1.0 – Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 1.1Plan Description The 2023 Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (MJLHMP) was written with the feedback and cooperation of multiple departments within the County of Riverside and multiple cities, tribes, and special districts. This plan is an update to the 2018 MJLHMP and reaffirms the commitment of the Riverside County Operational Area to reduce risks from natural and other hazards. Since 1980, Riverside County has had 49 Federal Disaster Declarations. The most recent Federally Declared Disaster was in September 2022 and was the result of the Fairview Fire. In addition, the county has experienced 21 Governor-Proclaimed State Disasters, with the most recent in September 2022. In 2022, Riverside County was impacted by floods, high winds, high heat, and fires. These natural disasters will occur again, often on a yearly basis. Riverside County cities, tribes, communities, and special districts share the common goal of becoming a disaster resistant operational area. 1.2Purpose of Plan and Authority Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000) (Public Law 106-390) provides the legal basis for FEMA mitigation planning requirements for State, local and Indian Tribal governments as a condition of mitigation grant assistance. DMA 2000 amended the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act by repealing the previous mitigation planning provisions and replacing them with a new set of requirements that emphasize the need for State, local, and Indian Tribal entities to closely coordinate mitigation planning and implementation efforts. The requirement for a State Hazard Mitigation Plan (SHMP) is continued as a condition of disaster assistance, adding incentives for increased coordination and integration of mitigation activities at the State level. DMA 2000 also established a requirement for local mitigation plans and authorized up to seven (7) percent of Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMPG) funds available to a State for development of State, local, and Indian Tribal mitigation plans.

County of Riverside Operational Area
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 23 | Section 11.3 Grant Programs with Mitigation Plan Requirements The Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) is authorized by Section 404 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, as amended (the Stafford Act), Title 42, United States Code (U.S.C.) 5170c. The key purpose of HMGP is to ensure that the opportunity to take critical mitigation measures to reduce the risk of loss of life and property from future disasters is not lost during the reconstruction process following a disaster. HMGP is available, when authorized under a Presidential major disaster declaration, in the areas of the State requested by the Governor. The amount of HMGP funding available to the Applicant is based upon the total Federal assistance to be provided by FEMA for disaster recovery under the Presidential major disaster declaration. The Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) program is authorized by Section 1366 of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended (NFIA), 42 U.S.C. 4104c, with the goal of reducing or eliminating claims under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). FEMA requires that the state, tribal, or local government applying for this form of assistance have adopted a hazard mitigation plan as a condition of receiving funding. The Disaster Recovery Reform Act of 2018 (DRRA) ² amended Section 203 of the Stafford Act. Through DRRA Section 1234, National Public Infrastructure Pre-Disaster Hazard Mitigation, FEMA will implement the amended authority in Section 203 by discontinuing the PDM grant program and establishing the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) grant program, associated program implementation materials, and notices. of funding opportunity (NOFOs). FEMA will fund BRIC from a six-percent set-aside of estimated disaster expenses for each major disaster, as authorized by Section 203(i). FEMA’s BRIC grant program give states, local communities, tribes, and territories funding to address future risks to natural disasters, including ones involving wildfires, drought, hurricanes, earthquakes, extreme heat, and flooding. See section 7.4 for Fiscal Mitigation Capabilities Section 322 of DMA 2000 specifically addresses mitigation planning at the state and local levels. It identifies requirements that allow HMGP funds to be used for planning activities and it increases the amount of HMGP funds available to states that have developed a comprehensive, enhanced mitigation plan prior to a disaster. States and communities must have an approved mitigation plan on file prior to receiving post-disaster HMGP funds. Local and tribal mitigation plans must demonstrate that their proposed mitigation measures are based on a sound planning process that accounts for the risk to and the capabilities of the individual communities. State governments have certain responsibilities for implementing Section 322, including:
x Preparing and submitting a standard or enhanced State Mitigation Plan County of Riverside Operational AreaMulti-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 24 | Section 1 x Reviewing and updating the State Mitigation Plan every five years Providing technical assistance and training to local governments to assist them in applying for HMGP grants and in developing local mitigation plans; and reviewing and approving local plans if the state is designated a managing state and has an approved enhanced plan. DMA 2000 is intended to facilitate cooperation between state and local authorities. It encourages and rewards local and state pre-disaster planning and promotes sustainability as a strategy for disaster resistance. This enhanced planning network is intended to enable local and state governments to articulate accurate needs for mitigation, resulting in faster allocation of funding and more effective risk reduction projects. FEMA prepared an Interim Final Rule, published in the Federal Register on February 26, 2002 (44 CFR Parts 201 and 206), which establishes planning and funding criteria for states and local communities. Since this ruling, FEMA has established revised planning policy guidance. That guidance goes into effect on April 19, 2023, which mandates new standards for mitigation plans approved following that date. The Riverside County Operational Area Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (MJLHMP) supports the values and goals of the FEMA, and Cal-OES. The 2018 State Hazard Mitigation Plan was used as a reference and source for relevant information and changes in the State of California Hazard Mitigation Planning process. The MJLHMP planning team members collaborated regularly with Cal-OES mitigation planning staff on the 2023 plan update. The 2018 State Hazard Mitigation Plan – An Enhanced State Mitigation Plan The document is a comprehensive update of the 2018 SHMP. It performs the following functions:

1. Describes goals, objectives, strategies, and priorities for future mitigation activities 2. Documents statewide hazard mitigation systems implemented in California to reduce risk

3. Highlights new hazard mitigation initiatives since the 2013 SHMP 4. Describes and illustrates mitigation progress and success stories 5. Facilitates integration of local, state, tribal, and private sector hazard mitigation activities into a comprehensive statewide effort
County of Riverside Operational Area
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 25 | Section 1Goals Shared with State Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan The County of Riverside Operational Area’s MJLHMP goals are shared with the State of California 2018 Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan. Goal 1: Significantly reduce life loss and injuries Goal 2: Minimize damage to structures and property, as well as interruption of essential services and activities
Goal 3: Protect the Environment Goal 4: Promote hazard mitigation and community resilience as both integrated public policy and standard business practice
While the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (“DMA 2000”) requires that local communities address only natural hazards, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) recommends that local comprehensive mitigation plans address human-caused and technological hazards to the extent possible. In the 2012 Plan, Riverside OA addressed an expansive set of hazards. Upon review of the hazards since 2018, and the numbers of human-caused incidents, the OAPC will continue to address the large set of humancaused, technological, and natural hazards. Communication Failure and Cyber Attacks had been added to the 2023 MJLHMP list of hazards. In 2022, the OAPC revised the hazards changing Flu Pandemic to Pandemic and adding Failure to Aqueduct to further define and allow for expanded use of the hazard definitions. In developing the original 2005 hazard list, the goal was to create a list by identifying all hazards that could potentially impact the Operational Area. This list was used as part of the planning process. Some of the disasters identified on the list were found to have a limited amount of supporting information about the potential impact, specific locations in the county where the hazard might arise, and the magnitude of that hazard on the economy, infrastructure, and residents of the County. The threats of all hazards identified in the 2018 plan were reassessed to ensure that they were still viable. The same process was used for the 2023 update. The 2023 MJLHMP Steering Committee met to address each hazard. The impact on the public; responders; continuity of operations including delivery of services; property, facilities, and infrastructure; environment; economic condition of the jurisdiction (OA); and public confidence in the jurisdiction’s (OA) governance were taken into consideration in analyzing the hazard rankings.

County of Riverside Operational AreaMulti-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 26 | Section 1Support of Broader County Vision The Riverside County MJLHMP supports the broader vision and values of the County of Riverside, along with the cities, special districts, and tribal leaders within the County. As stated in Riverside County General Plan of December 2015, Riverside County’s vision is summarized by saying:
“Riverside County is a family of special communities in a remarkable environmental setting.” Our vision is based on values that provide the foundation for common ground that, in turn; underpin the General Plan’s goals, policies, and actions. The people of Riverside County declare that they join together in holding the following values and seeking a community future based on them. It can be argued that our values are optimistic and very ambitious: that they require our best instincts to prevail. Of course-why would we seek less in shaping our communities? So, with that theme in mind, let us express the values that have motivated our community building and that will continue to do so in the future. x Community x Health x Inter-relatedness x Rights x Responsibilities x Risks x Diversity x Equity x Valued Contributions
x Varied
Communities
x Balance x Participation
x Volunteerism x Decision Making x Creativity and
Innovation
x Distinctiveness x Livable Centers x Housing x Natural Environment
x Human-caused
Environment
x Multi-Modal
Transportation
x Employment
x Safety x Planning Integration x Communication and
Information
x Quality Management
x Sustainability x Recreation x Healthy Food x Costs x Governmental Cooperation
x Youth in the
Community
Riverside County Operational Area Mission “To protect lives, properties, economies, and enhance efforts through multi-agency and tribal collaboration while striving to maximize our use of standardizations, sharing of resources, and political support.” County of Riverside Operational Area
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 27 | Section 11.4History of Multi-Jurisdictional Participants History of Participating Cities, Tribes, Hospitals, and Districts x Represented organizations from 24 cities,10 special districts, eight (8) school districts, 10 hospitals and one (1) tribe totaling 53 organizations participated in the 2005 MJLHMP. x Represented organizations from 27 cities, 11 special districts, 14 school districts, and one (1) hospital totaling 53 organizations participated in the 2012 MJLHMP. x Represented organizations from 26 cities, one (1) tribe, nine (9) school districts, one (1) hospital, and eight (8) special districts totaling 45 organizations participated in the 2018 MJLHMP. x Represented organizations from 28 cities, one (1) tribe, five (5) school districts, and seven (7) special districts participating in the 2023 MJLHMP.

County of Riverside Operational AreaMulti-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation PlanApril 2023EMD 5.1.25 28 This page intentionally left blank.

County of Riverside Operational Area
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 29 | Section 2Section 2.0 – Community Profile 2.1 History Taking its name from the City of Riverside, Riverside County was formed in 1893 from a small portion of San Bernardino County and a larger part of San Diego County. Although the county marks its political beginnings in 1893, the land was occupied long before Europeans and their descendants entered the areas by several Native American groups including the Serrano’s, the Luisenos, the Cupeño’s, the Chemehuevi, and the Cahuilla’s. One of the first Caucasian travelers through the area was Juan Bautista de Anza who led an overland expedition in 1774. In the late 18th century, the Spanish mission fathers of San Gabriel (Los Angeles County), San Juan Capistrano (Orange County), and San Luis Rey (San Diego) began colonizing the land and gradually used the interior valley in what is now western Riverside County for raising grain and cattle. During this period, Spain claimed all of California and Mexico. In the early 1820s, Mexican opposition leaders pronounced themselves free from Spanish rule, and California came under Mexican jurisdiction. The missions and their lands were secularized beginning in 1834 and the land was transferred as "grants" to Californians who were citizens of Mexico. The first land grant in what is now Riverside County, Rancho Jurupa, was given to Juan Bandini in 1838. In 1848, with the signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, California became a territory of the United States, and in 1850 California became a state. This event generated a steady flow of settlers into the area, including gold miners, entrepreneurs, health-seekers, speculators, politicians, adventurers, people seeking religious freedom, and individuals who envisioned utopian colonies. In May 1893, voters living within an area carved from San Bernardino County and San Diego County approved formation of Riverside County. On May 9, 1893, the county officially formed and began charting a course under its newly elected Board of Supervisors. The county's early years were linked to agriculture – yet commerce, construction, manufacturing, transportation, and tourism soon took hold. These industries contributed substantially to the region's rapid growth. Recent years have brought dramatic population growth. Between 1980 and 1990, the number of residents grew by over 76 percent, making Riverside the fastest-growing county in California. By 1992, the County was home to over 1.3 million residents, more than the entire population of 13 states, among them Maine, Nevada, Hawaii, and New County of Riverside Operational AreaMulti-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 30 | Section 2Hampshire. Current population estimates are 2.3 million residents, making Riverside County the fourth largest county by population in the state and 10th largest in the U.S.2.2 Geography and Climate Riverside County is the fourth largest county in the State of California, stretching nearly 200 miles west to east and comprising over 7,200 square miles of fertile river valleys, low deserts, mountains, foothills, and rolling plains. Riverside County shares borders with densely populated Orange, San Diego, San Bernardino, and Imperial Counties. The county extends from within 14 miles of the Pacific Ocean, as the crow flies, to the Colorado River and La Paz County, Arizona. Geographically Riverside County is mostly desert in the central and eastern portions of the county and has a Mediterranean climate in the western portion of the County. The County lies inland of Los Angeles County and is bordered by Orange County to the west, San Bernardino County to the north, and San Diego County and Imperial County to the south. Riverside County extends from the Santa Ana River at the eastern end of the Los Angeles basin, eastward to the Colorado River. It includes the desert regions of the Coachella Valley and Palm Springs, as well as the San Jacinto, Little San Bernardino, and Santa Rosa mountains. It contains portions of Anza-Borrego Desert State Park and Salton Sea State Recreation Area, as well as most of Joshua Tree National Park. Riverside County has five nationally protected areas: the Cleveland National Forest, Coachella Valley National Wildlife Refuge, and Joshua Tree National Park, a portion of the San Bernardino National Forest and the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument. The county has visitors all year round because of the varied climates and ability to visit mountains and deserts all in one day. The county has a total area of 7,303.13 square miles (18,915.0 km2), of which 7,207.37 square miles (18,667.0 km2) (or 98.69%) is land and 95.76 square miles (248.0 km2) (or 1.31%) is water. At roughly 180 miles (290 km) wide in the east-west dimension, the area of the county is massive. Riverside County is roughly the size of the State of New Jersey in total area. The City of Blythe, adjacent to the Colorado River, is a three-hour drive from the county seat, Riverside. There are at least three geomorphic provinces: the Inland Empire western portion, the Santa Rosa Mountains communities, and the desert region. Other subdivisions include tribal lands, the Colorado River communities, and the Salton Sea. The Inland Empire area of southern California is made up of the western portion of Riverside County.

County of Riverside Operational Area
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 31 | Section 2Geographically from east to west, Riverside County is mostly desert, with high heat in the summer and comfortable weather in the winter. Most of Joshua Tree National Park is located within the eastern part of the county. Elevations range from 11,499 feet (3,505 m) at the top of the San Gorgonio Mountain to 220 ft. (-67.1 m) below sea level at the Salton Sea. As you move towards the west, the San Jacinto Mountains separate the desert from the valleys. The summit of Mount San Jacinto stands 10,834 feet above sea level, and the San Jacinto Mountains are the second highest mountain range in Southern California. The Santa Ana River travels from Mt. San Gorgonio for nearly 100 miles (160 km) through San Bernardino, Riverside, and Orange counties before it eventually spills into the Pacific Ocean at Newport Beach and Huntington Beach. The western portion of the county has a Mediterranean climate and is the most densely populated area. The Santa Rosa Mountains, as well as the Southern California portion of the Sonoran Desert, physically divide Riverside County from San Diego County. Riverside County is home to a variety of endangered and protected species. Skillful planning and negotiation have resulted in the creation of several large habitat preserves, and the development of a multi-species habitat protection plan (MSHCP) for the western County area. The Plan protects 146 native species of plants, birds and animals and covers 1.26 million acres. The County is also participating in a MSHCP with the Coachella Valley Association of Governments in the Coachella Valley and surrounding mountains. Famous resort cities of the Coachella Valley such as Indian Wells, La Quinta, Rancho Mirage, Palm Springs, and Palm Desert are located within Riverside County. Riverside County is also home to many famous concerts and sports tournaments. The Coachella Valley Music and Arts Festival is a two-weekend event that attracts 198 thousand attendees and affects the local economy by over 84 million dollars a year. Stagecoach is a country music festival that attracts about 190 thousand over a three-day period. Coachella is a music festival established musical artists as well as emerging artists and reunited groups and attracts about 750 thousand people over a six-day period. The BNP Paribas Open is the largest professional combined ATP and WTA tennis tournament in the world. It houses 96 single players and 32 teams within the two stadiums. Another factor that brings people into Riverside County is the agriculture. There is an influx of farm workers according to the crop. Indio is the center of an important date growing region. In the desert areas, there is an increase in population during the winter by snowbirds. Many of the desert visitors are elderly or retired and may have Access and Functional Needs requirements. The term snowbird is used to describe people from the U.S. Northeast, U.S. Midwest, or Canada who spend a large portion of winter in warmer locales such as California, Arizona, Florida, Texas, the Carolinas, or elsewhere along the Sun County of Riverside Operational AreaMulti-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 32 | Section 2Belt region of the southern and southwest United States, Mexico, and areas of the Caribbean. Snowbirds are typically retirees, and business owners having second homes in warmer locations. Business owner snowbirds have businesses that can be easily moved from place to place, such as flea market and swap meet vendors. Many snowbirds travel and use Recreational Vehicles (RVs) as their secondary homes. Climate On average, there are 272 sunny days per year in Riverside County. The County average July high is around 95 degrees, and the January low is 43. Riverside County has on average 10 inches of rain per year. The US average is 38. Riverside County average snowfall is one (1) inch. The average US city gets 27 inches of snow per year. The number of days with any measurable precipitation is 30. Table 2: Riverside County Climate Climate Riverside, CA United States
Rainfall (in.) 11.3 38.1 Snowfall (in.) 0.0 27.8 Precipitation Days 34 106.2 Sunny Days 277 205 Avg. High 94.2 85.8 Avg. Low 42.4 21.7 UV Index 5.7 4.3 Elevation ft. 827 2,443 *Table is current as of December 2022 The information regarding the averages of the County does not accurately reflect the drastic differences in climate between the east and west portions of the County. The east portion of the County has a hot desert climate with average high summer temperatures over 100 degrees Fahrenheit. However, the average high summer temperatures for the County of Riverside Operational Area
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation PlanApril 2023EMD 5.1.25 33 | Section 2west portion of the County are below 95 degrees Fahrenheit. The following charts represent the two sides of the county:Figure 1: East County Average Annual Temperature 0 80604020
120100
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
High 72 75 82 88 96 103 108 107 102 92 79 71Average 56.5 60 66.5 72.5 80 86.5 92.5 92 86 75.5 63 55.5Low 41 45 51 57 64 70 77 77 70 59 47 40Precipitation 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.1 0 0 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.5 Temperature
Month
East County Average Annual Temperatures
County of Riverside Operational AreaMulti-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation PlanApril 2023EMD 5.1.25 34 | Section 2Figure 2: West County Average Annual Temperature*Charts are based on the most current information gathered from NOAA as of December 2022
Source: http://www.bestplaces.net/climate/city/california/riversidehttps://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/datatools/normals 0 908070605040302010
100
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
High 68 68 72 76 81 87 94 95 92 83 74 68Average 55 56 59 62.5 68 72.5 78 79 76.5 68.5 60 54.5Low 42 44 46 49 55 58 63 63 61 54 46 41Precipitation 2.5 2.7 1.8 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.9 1.5 Temperature
Month
West County Average Annual Temperatures
County of Riverside Operational Area
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 35 | Section 22.3 Population Trends Population growth in Riverside County has been quite rapid over the past two decades as can be seen in Figure 3 on the next page. According to the California Department of Finance, the population grew from approximately 1.2 million 1990 to nearly 2.45 million as of 2022. During this period, the county’s population more than doubled, making it the fastest growing county in California.

County of Riverside Operational AreaMulti-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 36 | Section 2Table 3: Unincorporated Area Population

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS
2020 2,418,185 2019 2,395,327 2018 2,372,473 2017 2,349,619 2016 2,326,765 2015 2,303,911 2014 2,281,057 2013 2,258,203 2012 2,235,349 2011 2,212,495 2010 2,189,641 1990 1,170,410 1980 663,166 1970 459,074 2020 Racial & Ethnic Population*2
Number Percent
White 800,972 33.20% African American 146,145 6.10% Asian 158,546 6.60% American Indian/Alaska Native 8,586 0.40%
Hawaiian and Pacific Islander
6,302 0.30%
Other Races 7,083 0.30% Two or More Races 70,535 2.90% Hispanic 1,211,185 50.3 Total 2,409,331 100% 2020 Population by Age *1
Number Percent
<5 150,424 6.24%
9-May 162,846 6.75%
14-Oct 184,845 7.67%
15-19 176,653 7.33%
20-24 161,765 6.71%
25-34 333,166 13.82%
35-44 316,169 13.12%45-54 298,690 12.39 55-59 147,480 6.12% 60-64 131,815 5.47%
65-74 201,114 8.34%
75-84 105,336 4.37%
85+ 39,028 1.61%
Vital Statistics *4
Total Births
Birth
Rate
Total
Death Death Rate
28,383 11.46 19,696 7.95 2020 Population by Sex *1
Number Percent Median Age
Male 1,207,397 50.11% 35.4
Female 1,201,934 49.88% 36.7
2020 Voter Registration *3
Number Percent
Democrat 530,258 40.51%
Republican 409,584 31.29%
Other 101,099 7.72%
No Party Preference 267,992 20.47%
Total Registered 1,308,933 100%
*Table was developed by EMD GIS SPECIALIST in 2022 and is the most current information available. Sources from: 1-U.S. Census Bureau; 2-California State Department of Finance; 3-Riverside County Projections; 4-California State Department of Finance County of Riverside Operational Area
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 37 | Section 2Table 4: Historical Population Estimates for Riverside County Cities *Current as of May 2020 Source https://rivcoeda.org/Portals/0/demographicReports/Population%20Reports/Historical%20Estimates%202010-2019.pdf?ver=2020-05-06-111746-313 County of Riverside Operational AreaMulti-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation PlanApril 2023EMD 5.1.25 38 | Section 2Figure 3: Riverside County Population Growth - 2009 – 2019Source: Riverside County Center for Demographics 2021/ State of California Department of Finance 2600000255000025000002450000240000023500002300000225000022000002150000 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Population Projected
County of Riverside Operational Area
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 39 | Section 2Table 5 below displays Riverside County’s population change and the components of this population change from 2010 through a projection of 2059. Net migration (in-migration minus out-migration) has accounted for the majority of the of the population growth for Riverside County for the past four (4) decades.Population growth has slowed in recent years but remained relatively high. Migration continues to be positive in the County, though at slower rates than early in the decade. Population growth will accelerate over the forecast but does not approach the previous peak levels. Table 5: Riverside County Population Change (2010-2034)

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

AVERAGE COMPONENTS OF POPULATION CHANGE
YEAR – 2010 - 2034
Years Change Births Deaths Net Migration
2010-2014 22912 26516 13016 9412 2015-2019 24437 29225 17116 12328 2020-2024 28921 28949 19880 19852 2025-2029 26832 29618 22732 19946 2030-2034 22541 29471 25366 18436 2035-2039 18453 28631 27936 17758 Source: CA Department of Finance 2021
County of Riverside Operational AreaMulti-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 40 | Section 22.4 Economy California Department of Transportation Long-Term Social-Economic Forecast: Riverside Riverside County is the fourth largest county in California in terms of total land area. Riverside County has a population of approximately 2.4 million people and a total of 622,141 wage and salary jobs. The income per capita is $32,079, and the median house income is $76,066 In 2021, total employment increased by 4.5 percent within Riverside County. The unemployment rate averaged 10.0 percent in 2020 and was projected to average 7.5 percent in 2021. In 2020, job growth was strongest in transportation. education and healthcare (+4,500 jobs), leisure and hospitality (+3,800 jobs), and transportation and warehousing (+3,300 jobs). Job losses were not observed in any major sector. Over the past five years, the population has increased at an average annual rate of 1.2 percent. A substantial portion of this growth was the result of net migration, as an average of 12,200 each year. Forecast Highlights •On an annual average basis, 32,400 non-farm jobs will be restored in Riverside County during 2021. • A full labor market recovery is expected by 2022. • Employment gains in 2021 will be largest in leisure services, professional business services, private education and healthcare, and retail trade. • The unemployment rate averaged 10.0 percent in 2020. It is expected to average 7.5 percent in 2021. • The population is expanding faster than broader Southern California, and this trend will continue. • Because of affordable home prices and job creation, net migration will remain positive between 2021 and 2026. • Over the 2021-2026 forecast period, more homes will be built than during the 2015- 2020 period.
• Home prices increased unexpectedly in 2020, rising by 10 percent. Prices are forecast to increase by another 7 to 9 percent in 2021.

County of Riverside Operational Area
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 41 | Section 2 • More than 19 million square feet of new industrial space is under construction. This paves the way for substantial logistics industry growth over the next 5 years. Source: https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/transportationplanning/documents/data-analytics-services/transportation-economics/socioeconomicforecasts/2021/2021-pdf/riverside-profile-a11y.pdf County of Riverside Operational AreaMulti-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 42 | Section 2Figure 4: Riverside County Economic and Labor Force Characteristics *Chart was developed by EMD GIS Specialist in 2023 and is the most current information available Source: http://gis.rivcoit.org/Portals/0/Documents/rcd/progress_reports/pr_2013/riverside_county.pdf County of Riverside Operational Area
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 43 | Section 2Figure 5: Annual Labor Force and Employment Averages Source: Riverside County Economic Development Agency https://rivcoeda.org/Portals/0/demographicReports/Employ/Apr%20Employ%2020.pdf?v er=2020-05-22-095416-947
County of Riverside Operational AreaMulti-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 44 | Section 2Figure 6: County of Riverside Major Employers County of Riverside Operational Area
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 45 | Section 2Table 6: Employment Growth Projections of Riverside and San Bernardino County Industry Title
Base Year
Employment
Estimate
2018[2][3]
Projected
Year
Employment
Estimate
2028
Numeric
Change
2018-2028
Percentage
Change
2018-2028
Total Employment 1,610,500 1,773,100 162,600 10.1%Self Employment[4] 88,400 96,400 8,000 9.0%Private Household Workers[5] 900 1,200 300 33.3%Total Farm 14,500 14,800 300 2.1%Total Nonfarm 1,506,700 1,660,700 154,000 10.2%Mining and Logging 1,200 1,100 -100 -8.3%Construction 105,200 119,000 13,800 13.1%Construction of Buildings 15,600 17,700 2,100 13.5%Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction 12,500 13,900 1,400 11.2%Specialty Trade Contractors 77,000 87,400 10,400 13.5%Foundation, Structure, and Building Exterior Contractors 24,000 27,200 3,200 13.3%Building Equipment Contractors 26,800 31,600 4,800 17.9%Building Finishing Contractors 17,800 19,800 2,000 11.2%Manufacturing 101,100 98,400 -2,700 -2.7%Durable Goods Manufacturing 65,100 63,000 -2,100 -3.2%Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing 15,000 15,400 400 2.7%Nondurable Goods Manufacturing 36,000 35,500 -500 -1.4%Trade, Transportation, and Utilities 379,600 434,800 55,200 14.5%Wholesale Trade 65,500 69,200 3,700 5.6%Merchant Wholesalers, Durable Goods 38,500 40,000 1,500 3.9%Merchant Wholesalers, Nondurable Goods 24,000 26,800 2,800 11.7%Retail Trade 181,200 183,400 2,200 1.2%Motor Vehicle and Parts Dealers 26,000 26,300 300 1.2%Automotive Parts, Accessories, and Tire Stores 7,500 7,200 -300 -4.0%Building Material and Garden Equipment and Supplies Dealers 14,300 14,300 0 0.0%Food and Beverage Stores 34,100 37,200 3,100 9.1%Health and Personal Care Stores 11,600 12,100 500 4.3%Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores 21,000 18,700 -2,300 -11.0%Clothing Stores 15,800 14,100 -1,700 -10.8%General Merchandise Stores 36,000 35,900 -100 -0.3%Transportation, Warehousing, and Utilities 132,900 182,200 49,300 37.1%Utilities 4,900 4,900 0 0.0%Transportation and Warehousing 128,000 177,300 49,300 38.5%Truck Transportation 27,000 33,600 6,600 24.4%General Freight Trucking 21,200 27,100 5,900 27.8%Couriers and Messengers 14,300 20,000 5,700 39.9%Warehousing and Storage 68,900 104,700 35,800 52.0%Information 11,400 12,100 700 6.1%Publishing Industries (except Internet) 1,600 1,500 -100 -6.3% County of Riverside Operational AreaMulti-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation PlanApril 2023EMD 5.1.25 46 | Section 2Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employment Projections Program.

County of Riverside Operational Area
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 47 | Section 2Governing Body Riverside County is governed by a five-member Board of Supervisors. By law, Supervisorial district boundaries are adjusted every ten years based on population changes reported by the U.S. Census Bureau. Map 1 outlines the current Supervisorial Districts. In 2020, the population by districts is the following: • District 1 (Kevin Jeffries): 487,008 • District 2 (Karen Spiegel): 488,527 • District 3 (Chuck Washington): 488,901 • District 4 (Manuel Perez): 465,027 • District 5 (Yxstian Gutierrez): 487,975 Map 1: Riverside County Supervisor Districts County of Riverside Operational AreaMulti-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 48 | Section 22.5 Land Use and Development Trends Existing land use within Riverside County is a mosaic of varying types of uses, ownership, character, and intensity. Uses include: Figure 7: Land Use Designation Key *https://planning.rctlma.org/Portals/14/Ch03_Land%20Use_FINAL%209-28-21.pdf While population growth continues, so does the need for further development. There are Land Use policies and elements within the Riverside County General Plan to help assure orderly development. In addition, the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) of Riverside County is tasked with the mission to provide an orderly pattern of growth that reconciles the varied needs of the County. One of the fundamental principles of LAFCO is to ensure the establishment of an appropriate and logical municipal government structure for the distribution of efficient and appropriate public services. LAFCO Land Use Objectives include:
x To encourage the orderly formation of local governmental agencies x To preserve agricultural land resources x To discourage urban sprawl County of Riverside Operational Area
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 49 | Section 2 Hazard risk and its impact on changes in development
While the Riverside County continues to expand and grow in population, the OA continues to conform to standards and best practices included standards for building, fire, and safety code. There has been no development within Riverside County unincorporated areas that have increased hazard risk or vulnerability since the previous plan was adopted in 2018. Please refer to jurisdictional LHMP annexes for hazard impacts on new development within city jurisdictional areas. Historical examples of development in Riverside County Keller Crossing was approved on October 9, 2013. This “Green Concept” environment set to create a mixed-use pedestrian-friendly community that is based on sustainability. This 200-acre property is located in western Riverside County, near Murrieta. Completed in July 2013, Temecula added a new hospital within its city limits to accommodate the needs of its residents. The medical facility sits on a 35-acre parcel and holds a total of 320 beds. Belle Terre is a 342.3- acre residential community located in Riverside’s French Valley. This development proposed a community of up to 1,282 homes. The Zoning Ordinance was approved on December 1, 2014. The Wine Country on the outskirts of Temecula is continuing to see a lot of development activity. Recognizing this, the Board of Supervisors adopted the Wine Country Community Plan in 2014, which consisted of revisions to the County General Plan, new design guidelines, and new zone classifications. The area has been classified as a Wine County Zone with the purpose of encourage agricultural cultivation, vineyards, wineries, equestrian uses, preserve the wine-making atmosphere, estate living, equestrian lifestyle and protect this area and its residents from incompatible uses which could result in reduced agricultural productivity and increased urbanization within the policy area. The Cabazon Outlet Mall in has expanded to add an additional 50 stores, an increase of 30 percent. The expansion was completed in 2014 and it included: 50 new retail stores, a 1,100-parking space structure, wider walkways and improved landscaping. The Cabazon Outlet Mall is now a 650,000 square foot complex with a total of 180 stores, making it one of the largest outlet centers in the state. In February 2015, the Colina del Oro housing plan was initiated and approved by Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO). It is a master-planned community consisting of both single and multi-family residential units. Within the community an array of recreational facilities would be built such as a community park, County of Riverside Operational AreaMulti-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 50 | Section 2community center, trails, and an open space park. 490 dwellings were planned within the 11.4-acre community. A new Kaiser Permanente medical office building opened in November 2022 on a 37-acre parcel of land at 28150 Keller Road Murrieta. A 254-bed hospital and parking structure is scheduled to be completed late 2023.

County of Riverside Operational Area
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 51 | Section 2Figure 8: Housing and Household Characteristics *Chart was developed by EMD GIS Specialist in 2013 and is the most current information available Source: http://gis.rivcoit.org/Portals/0/Documents/rcd/progress_reports/pr_2013/riverside_county .pdf
County of Riverside Operational AreaMulti-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 52 | Section 2Table 7: Housing Projections by City County of Riverside Operational Area
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 53 | Section 2 Source: Western Riverside Council of Government Council (WRCOG) County of Riverside Operational AreaMulti-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 54 | Section 22.6 Cities of Riverside County Riverside County has 28 cities and multiple special districts.Participating representatives from cities, tribes, special districts, and school districts attended workshops, and meetings and assisted with the hazard analysis for the region by discussing issues impacting their jurisdictions. These discussions increased their knowledge of the hazards influencing areas within Riverside County. The participants provided insight on hazards and concerns facing their jurisdictions, but not common across the county. Participating jurisdictions in the Riverside County MJLHMP have their own governing bodies (e.g., city councils, tribal councils, water district boards, hospital boards, etc.) and upon Cal OES and FEMA approval they will formally adopt the plan via resolution through their governing body. 2.6.1 Banning The City of Banning is in Riverside County in the San Gorgonio Pass area of California. It is approximately twenty-three (23) square miles in area and is 30 miles east of the County seat in the City of Riverside. Banning is 80 miles east of Los Angeles, 23 miles west of Palm Springs, 25 miles north of the resort mountain community of Idyllwild. Banning is immediately adjacent to Beaumont to the west and the Morongo Indian Reservation to the east. The Union Pacific Railroad and California State Highway 10 both run through the middle of the City. Smith Creek, a waterway that starts in the mountains and runs through the lower part of the valley, is close to Banning’s southern and eastern boundaries.Banning enjoys a yearly average daily temperature of approximately 79 degrees. Average temperatures are in the high 90’s during the summer and low 40’s during the winter. The average rainfall for Banning is about 16 inches per year. Incorporated in 1913, the City of Banning has a rich and colorful history. Initially, Banning served as a stagecoach and railroad stop between the Arizona territories and Los Angeles. Today, Banning is home to nearly 30,000 residents and features clean air, ample water supplies and the memorable and inspiring scenic vistas of Mt. San Gorgonio and Mt. San Jacinto. Its signature community event is Stagecoach Days, an annual rodeo and a parade that celebrates Banning’s Western heritage.

County of Riverside Operational Area
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 55 | Section 22.6.2 Beaumont The City of Beaumont is located in Riverside County and is bordered by City of Calimesa and unincorporated County areas, on the north by the unincorporated County areas (Cherry Valley), on the south by unincorporated County areas and the City of San Jacinto, and on the east by the City of Banning. Beaumont is located approximately 70 miles east of Los Angeles, 21 miles east of Riverside, and 21 miles southeast of San Bernardino. The geographic area governed by the Beaumont General Plan includes the City's boundaries as they existed in 2005 and the City's established Sphere of Influence. Because there is considerable variation within the area governed by the General Plan, the larger Beaumont Planning Area has been subdivided into eight smaller planning areas: 1) Town Center Planning Area, 2) Oak Valley Planning Area, 3) North Beaumont Planning Area, 4) East Beaumont Planning Area, 5) 6th Street Corridor Planning Area, 6) Southeast Beaumont Planning Area, Southwest Planning Area, 8) West Beaumont Planning Areas. The City of Beaumont was incorporated in November 1912. Founded at the turn of the twentieth century, Beaumont residents are proud of their city’s rich history and rural charm. The town served as a welcome “stopping-off point” for early travelers making their way from the Mohave desert to Los Angeles (L.A.), and later for L.A. residents eager to vacation in Palm Springs. Some, however, set down roots, drawn by the beautiful mountain vistas, clean, crisp air, and the abundance of cherry and apple orchards. Beaumont residents are proud of these early settlers and their families, many of whom continue to live and thrive in Beaumont. Population- City of Beaumont is estimated to have 45,118. (2015) The City of Beaumont provided specific information regarding extreme wind events, and the public notices that are sent during a wind event. 2.6.3 Blythe The City of Blythe is in Riverside County in the Palo Verde Valley of California. The City of Blythe comprises approximately 16,400 acres (approximately 27 square miles) in area and is 145 miles east of Riverside City, the County’s seat. The Blythe’s Sphere Of Influence (SOI) surrounds the incorporated city limits and comprises approximately 12,800 acres (approximately 20 square miles). The jurisdiction sits directly adjacent to La Paz County, Arizona on its eastern boundary and Imperial County along its southern boundary. The Colorado River is a waterway that forms the eastern boundary of Blythe. Regional access to Blythe is provided by Interstate-10 (I-10), State Highway 78 (SR-78), and State Route 95 (US 95). The Greyhound bus line also provides access to and from Blythe.

County of Riverside Operational AreaMulti-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 56 | Section 2Jurisdiction’s climate can be described as moderate. Temperatures and rainfall for jurisdiction are typical of that of the eastern part of Riverside County. The City of Blythe is a General Law city which was incorporated in 1916. It is located 225 miles east of Los Angeles and 150 miles west of Phoenix Arizona. The Colorado River embraces the east side of the Palo Verde Valley. The City has a Council-Manager form of municipal government. The City Council appoints the City Manager who is responsible for the day-to-day administration of City business and the coordination of all departments. The City Council is composed of five members elected biannually to alternating four-year terms. The City of Blythe encompasses an area of approximately 26.8 square miles and is situated 265 feet above sea level. Blythe has a California desert climate with winter temperatures averaging 55-75 degrees, and summer temperatures averaging 85-110 degrees. Annual rainfall is approximately four (4) inches per year. 2.6.4 Calimesa The City is located in the northwestern portion of Riverside County, between the cities of Yucaipa and Beaumont, between San Bernardino and Palm Springs. Calimesa is in the region known as the Inland Empire, which covers all of San Bernardino and Riverside Counties and is between the foothills of the San Bernardino and San Jacinto Mountains. The city's elevation ranges between 2,300 to 3,500 feet above sea level. According to the United States Census Bureau, the city has a total area of 14.8 square miles, all of it land. Climatic Conditions: Generally, Calimesa has an arid climate. Annual rainfall varies from ten (10) to twenty-three (23) inches within the San Gorgonio Pass area of Riverside County and the City. Hot, dry Santa Ana winds are common to areas within the City. These winds constitute a contributing factor, which causes small fires originating in rural and urban development to spread quickly and create the need for an increased level of fire protection. The City of Calimesa was incorporated on December 1, 1990, soon after the incorporation of its northern neighbor, the City of Yucaipa. Prior to its incorporation, the City of Calimesa existed as an unincorporated town that straddled the Riverside–San Bernardino County line at the location where Interstate 10 climbs the San Gorgonio Pass going eastward from Redlands, California. Historically, Calimesa was divided from Yucaipa, in San Bernardino County, by the Wildwood Canyon Wash and County Line Road. I-Street Park and Calimesa Elementary School providing services to the town of Calimesa were, and currently are, within the boundaries of Yucaipa. California State law prohibits city incorporation or annexation over county lines. Because of this, when Calimesa went through incorporation it was County of Riverside Operational Area
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 57 | Section 2unable to incorporate parts of what was considered within Calimesa. Although the two cities are in separate counties, both Yucaipa and Calimesa share the same basic street and address system, including street names which are congruent with both cities. The general boundary between the two cities is County Line Road, which ironically does not follow the exact county line in some places due to the alignment of Calimesa Creek, which meanders in and out of both Yucaipa and Calimesa. The City Limits of Calimesa extend southwest to the City of Beaumont. Although much less refined, the boundaries between Beaumont and Calimesa fall generally along the Southern California Edison (SCE) right-of-way that extends from the El Casco electrical sub-station facility near Moreno Valley, eastward. Near the I-10 freeway, Champions Drive is the common boundary between the two Cities. The City of Calimesa has an estimated population of 10,053. 2.6.5 Canyon Lake The City of Canyon Lake is an incorporated city in Riverside County. It is approximately four and a half square miles in area and is 31 miles south of the County seat, the City of Riverside. The City of Canyon Lake sits directly adjacent to the City of Menifee on its eastern boundary, City of Lake Elsinore on its Western and southern boundaries. The City of Canyon Lake lies between the I-15 and I-215. Railroad Canyon Road, an arterial highway, bisects the community and provides the major connection to these freeways. The San Jacinto River, a waterway that starts in the Mountains and runs over 75 miles through the County, feeds into Canyon Lake and flows into Lake Elsinore. The City of Canyon Lake climate in winter is rarely extreme, low temperatures almost never go below freezing. In the summer the high temperatures will hover in the high 90’s but during heat waves can exceed 100 degrees. Rainfall is typical of that of the rest of Riverside County. The City of Canyon Lake was established in March of 1968 as a relaxed private gated community offering recreational opportunities. Canyon Lake is primarily a bedroom community of mature and newer homes. As a private gated community, Canyon Lake has an equestrian center, campground, and many other amenities. The City of Canyon Lake incorporated on December 1, 1990, to become more responsive to its residents. 2.6.6 Cathedral City The City of Cathedral City is a corporate city in Riverside County in the Coachella Valley of California. It is approximately 20 square miles in area and is 64 miles east of the County seat, the City of Riverside. All borders of Cathedral City are within Riverside County. The Union Pacific Railroad and Interstate Highway 10 both run through the northern-most County of Riverside Operational AreaMulti-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 58 | Section 2portion of the City. The Santa Rosa Mountains border the southern-most portion of the city. Cathedral City’s climate can be described as arid most of the year, with summer heat more than 110 degrees Fahrenheit anytime from June through September, and colder winter evening temperatures as low as 25 degrees Fahrenheit from December through February. The average rainfall is less than three inches per year. Temperatures and rainfall for Cathedral City are typical of the rest of the Coachella Valley (eastern Riverside County). Cathedral City was established in 1925 and incorporated in 1981. Strategically located, with city limits on both sides of Interstate 10, Cathedral City is a haven for expanding and relocating businesses. Cathedral City’s population ranks in the top three cities in the Coachella Valley. Businesses view the region as a triangle of opportunity between Los Angeles and San Diego. Coachella Valley is situated inland, approximately equal distances from each metropolitan area. This triangle of commercial businesses, light industry, and professional services is expanding and becoming one metropolis of continued growth. 2.6.7 Coachella Coachella is a city in Riverside County, California; it is the easternmost city in the region collectively known as the Coachella Valley. It is located 28 miles east of Palm Springs, 72 miles east of Riverside, and 130 miles east of Los Angeles. The eastern half of the Coachella valley is below sea level, and the area's average elevation is 68 feet (35 m) below sea level. The Salton Sea, a saltwater lake located about 10 miles (16 km) South of Coachella, lies 227 feet (69 m) below sea level. The city also lends its name to the Coachella grapefruit; the town's stretch of State Route 111 is named Grapefruit Boulevard in its honor. Harrison Street or State Route 86 is declared historic U.S. Route 99, the major thoroughfare that connects with Interstate 10 a few miles north of town. Known as the "City of Eternal Sunshine", Coachella is largely a rural, agricultural, familyoriented community in the desert and one of the state's fastest growing cities in the late 20th century. When it first incorporated back in 1946, it had 1,000 residents, but the population was 45,407 at the 2010 census. The city was originally founded as Woodspur in 1876, when the Southern Pacific Railroad built a rail siding on the site. In the 1880s the indigenous Cahuilla tribe sold their land County of Riverside Operational Area
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 59 | Section 2plots to the railroads for new lands east of the current town site, and in the 1890s, a few hundred Mexican railroad workers took up settlement along the tracks. The origin of the name Coachella is unclear, but in 1901 the citizens of Woodspur voted on a new name for their community; at their town hall meeting, the homeowners settled on "Coachella". Some locals believe it was a misspelling of Conchilla, a Spanish word for the small white snail shells found in the valley's sandy soil, vestiges of a lake which dried up over 3,000 years ago. Coachella began as a 2.5-square-mile (6.5 km2) territory gridded out on the mesquite covered desert floor. Not until the 1950s did Coachella begin to expand into its present range, about 32 square miles (83 km2), an area which contained large year-round agricultural corporate farms and fruit groves, particularly of citrus (lemons, oranges, grapefruit) and date palms. Coachella became a city in 1946. During the incorporation voting process, the first city council was tentatively elected: Lester C. Cox, T. E. Reyes, John W. Westerfield, Lester True, and Paul S. Atkinson. Also elected on November 26, 1946, were City Clerk Marie L. Johnson and City Treasurer John C. Skene. John Westerfield was appointed mayor at the first meeting. 2.6.8 Corona The City of Corona is located approximately 45 miles southeast of Los Angeles in western Riverside County. It is located in a valley, framed by mountains and the Prado Basin. Original settlements focused development in an area within and adjacent to Grand Boulevard. As the City grew, the geographic limitations imposed by the Cleveland National Forest to the south and the Prado Basin to the northeast created natural barriers that confined the City. The City is bordered by the City of Norco to the north, the City of Riverside to the east, and Riverside County to the west and south. The City limits encompass 39.2 square miles and the population is approximately 159,132. A city whose heritage spans more than a century, Corona has emerged as an ethnically diverse community, where a significant percentage of the population is made up of young, well-educated families. The Corona community boasts many amenities that provide a first-rate quality of life for residents. The City has more than 394 acres of parks, with sports fields, basketball courts, playgrounds, tennis courts, two skate parks and an outdoor pool. Two major freeways and one railroad transect Corona. The Riverside Freeway (SR-91) runs east/west directly north of the City’s center, Interstate 15 (I-15) runs north/south near the eastern edge of the City, and the railroad parallels SR-91. These corridors are major transportation routes to the economic center of Orange County from the Inland Empire.

County of Riverside Operational AreaMulti-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 60 | Section 2Two geographical areas are considered to be within the boundaries of the City of Corona General Plan Planning area: lands within the City’s corporate limits, and lands within its Sphere of Influence (SOI). The SOI was defined by the City, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), and the Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO). It represents the areas likely to be served by and potentially annexed to the City. The SOI includes three geographically distinct areas including the West, East and South Spheres. The West Sphere encompasses three geographic areas: the Prado Basin, Coronita and the Foothill area. The East Sphere includes the areas of Home Gardens, Eagle Valley East, and El Cerrito. Temescal Canyon makes up the South Sphere. The City of Corona Planning area is within the South Coast Air Basin of California. The air basin is a 6,600-square mile area encompassing the non-desert portions of Riverside, Los Angeles, and San Bernardino Counties and all of Orange County. Bounded by the Pacific Ocean to the west and the San Gabriel, San Bernardino, and San Jacinto Mountains to the north and east, the South Coast Air Basin is an area of high air pollution potential. The climate of the South Coast Air Basin is dominated by the strength and position of the semi-permanent high-pressure center over the Pacific Ocean near Hawaii. It creates the climate conditions typical of Southern California, (i.e., relatively cool summers, mild winters, infrequent rainfall, cool daytime sea breezes, comfortable humidity, and ample sunshine). Periods of extremely hot weather, winter storms, or Santa Ana wind conditions interrupt this pattern. Unfortunately, the same atmospheric processes that create the desirable living climate combine to restrict the ability of the atmosphere to disperse the air pollution generated by the region’s population.The location of the Planning Area, east of the Chino Hills and Santa Ana Mountains, insulates it from the moderating effect of the ocean. Temperatures and precipitation in Corona vary more dramatically than coastal areas of the basin. Average summertime high temperatures range between about 85 to 92 degrees Fahrenheit from June through September, and average wintertime low temperatures are generally near 40 degrees in December and January. Rainfall is highly variable and confined almost exclusively to the winter months. Rainfall in Corona averages about 12.6 inches annually. Predominating winds travel from the ocean, across the urbanized coastal areas of Orange and Los Angeles Counties, to Corona through the Santa Ana River Canyon. The canyon acts as a funnel for air masses moving across the basin. Daytime winds are typically channeled through the canyon to create steady, abnormally high (greater than 12mph) wind velocities from the west. Typical nighttime conditions reverse, and light winds (less than 1 mph) drift back towards the ocean. Exceptions to this pattern occur when a high- County of Riverside Operational Area
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 61 | Section 2pressure center forms over the western United States and creates the strong, hot, dry, gusty Santa Ana winds, which move through Corona from the eastern deserts into the canyon. Corona’s historic resources are those physical elements, both structural and natural, which define Corona’s past. They help give the City its unique identity, charm, and orientation. These resources, when well preserved and maintained, provide the community with a sense of permanence, which fosters civic pride and stewardship among its residents and businesses. Information describing the historic and cultural resources were derived from the California Environmental Resources Evaluation Systems (CERES) website, as well as the Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP) (March 2000) existing setting conditions. Corona’s history is an evolution of Native American inhabitation, Missionary influence, agricultural development, and eventual rapid urbanization. The City’s growth and development is typical of many other areas in Southern California.In the early 1700s, prior to the arrival of the Spanish, the Gabrieleno and Luiseno Indians occupied the Corona area. These Native Americans used the hot waters in Temescal Canyon for bathing and religious ceremonies. Current residents and visitors still enjoy the rejuvenating mud baths and hot springs at the Glen Ivy Springs resort. Luiseno religious ceremonies were strictly followed, and remnants of some of their artistic pictographs and petroglyphs can still be found on rocks in undeveloped areas. In the early 1800s, the agricultural and cattle ranching base developed, and portions of Corona became part of the Mexican land grants (Rancho La Sierra Yorba, Rancho Jurupa, Rancho El Rincon, and Rancho El Sobrante de San Jacinto). With the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo (1846), Mexico ceded the Corona area as part of California to the United States. The Yorba, Serrano, Sepulveda, Cot, and Botiller families’ ranched sheep and cattle on the original ranchos in the area. Remnants of the Serrano tanning vats are still found on Old Temescal Canyon Road. In 1849, the California gold rush brought prospectors, settlers, and new development to southern California. The Butterfield Stage stops, and the Serrano adobes are found along this road. In 1886, developer Robert Taylor persuaded his partners: Rimpau, Joy, Garretson, and Merrill to form the South Riverside Land and Water Company. Together they raised approximately $110,000 to purchase approximately 12,000 acres of good agricultural land. Taylor realized the importance of water for the soon to be developed community, and additional funds were used to ensure that sufficient water rights were obtained. Taylor hired Anaheim engineer H. C. Kellogg to design a circular Grand Boulevard three miles round. Early residents used to parade their fancy buggies on this circular street that enclosed the main functions of the community: schools, churches, residences, and stores. To the north along the railroad tracks were the manufacturing plants and packing houses.

County of Riverside Operational AreaMulti-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 62 | Section 2The southern end of town was left to the citrus industry, and the mining companies were established just outside the city’s southeastern and eastern city limits.The town’s founders initially named their development South Riverside after the successful citrus community of Riverside, just a few miles away. Almost all the new settlers planted orange and lemon trees in hopes of gaining future profits. New groves continued to spring up and, by 1912, there were 5,000 acres of established lemon and orange groves. By 1913, Corona shipped more fruit than any other town in Southern California. In 1961, citrus was still considered the backbone of Corona’s economy and the largest source of revenue. In that year, citrus covered 7,500 acres. The labor force fluctuated between 400 and 1,800 workers at the peak of the harvest. An additional 500 people worked at the Exchange Lemon Products plant. By 1982, Corona’s agricultural industry faced a bleak future as production costs made the economics of farming financially unsuccessful. Plans were begun to replace the groves with approximately 12,500 dwelling units. On July 13, 1896, residents voted to incorporate and change the name of the community to Corona, which is Spanish for crown, in honor of the City’s circular Grand Boulevard. By 1900, the population had reached 1,434 people. On September 9, 1913, in observance of California’s Admission’s Day, Corona residents celebrated with an international automobile race on the Boulevard. The event attracted such auto racing greats as: Ralph DePalma, Barney Oldfield, Terrible Teddy Tetzlaff and Earl Cooper. More than 100,000 people came to the town of 4,000 to watch Cooper win the race and a prize of $8,250. It was so successful that races were held again in 1914 and 1916. The demise of the Corona road races was due not only to tragic deaths, which occurred in 1916, but also because of the cost and local effort needed to continually stage such an extravagant event. 2.6.9 Desert Hot Springs Desert Hot Springs is located approximately 112 miles from Los Angeles, in the center of Riverside County. The City sits in the foothills of the San Bernardino Mountains and overlooks the entire Coachella Valley. The southern city boundaries are adjacent to Palm Springs and Cathedral City, divided by Interstate 10. To the east of the city is the unincorporated community of Sky Valley. To the west are the unincorporated areas of North Palm Springs and White Water. To the north of the city is predominately Joshua Tree National Park and lands governed by the Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM). The City also sits at two entry points of the recently recognized, Sand to Snow National Monument. The area has sparse vegetation, which is consistent with the Southern California lower desert. Annual grass and desert flowers are dependent on annual precipitation averaging County of Riverside Operational Area
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 63 | Section 2just over 5 inches a year. Temperatures during the summer can reach 115 degrees during the peak day and the high 80’s during the night. Winter temperatures are in the high 70’s to low 80’s and lows at night average in the 50’s. Summers tend to produce occasional monsoonal thunderstorms, while the winter tends to be windy, depending on the low pressures systems reacting with the local mountain ranges. In 1913 Cabot Yerxa arrived in the City. He was the first Homesteader and discovered hot water on Miracle Hill. Due to the San Andreas Fault bisecting the hill, one side has cold water, the other has hot. His large adobe, hand built by Yerxa, is one of the oldest adobe structures in Riverside County and is listed on the Nation Register of Historic Places. The town was founded by L. W. Coffee on July 12, 1941. The original site was centered on the intersection of Palm Drive and Pierson Blvd. and was only a square mile in area. He named it Desert Hot Springs in honor of the waters Yerxa had discovered. The City of Desert Hot Springs incorporated in 1963, with 1,000 residents. Since that time, Desert Hot Springs has solidified itself as a tourist destination through its small spa hotels. In its early days the city's seclusion appealed to urban "escapees". Desert Hot Springs experienced periods of dizzying growth in the 1980s and 1990s when most of the vacant lots were filled with new houses and duplex apartments. The city's population doubled in the 1980s and increased by another 5,000 in the 2000 census. Between 2000 and 2010 the population grew by 9000 residents resulting in a final population count of 25,938 full time residents following the 2010 census. With much of the City’s land undeveloped, development in the city and population is expected to steadily grow for many years to come. The City is the home to (5) Elementary Schools, (2) Middle Schools and (1) High School, (3) Parks and a Health and Wellness Center serving residents of the Community. In 2014 the City Council adopted Ordinances allowing for Medical Marijuana Dispensaries and the large-scale Cultivation of Medical Marijuana. Development of this rapidly growing industry is permitted in the Industrial Zone of the City.2.6.10 Eastvale Eastvale is one of the newest cities in Western Riverside County. Eastvale incorporated on October 1, 2010, since then it has grown to a population of over 63,162 residents. Eastvale is 13.2 square miles strategically poised between Interstate 15 and California State Routes 91, 60, and 71, making access easy for residents, visitors, and businesses alike. Residents and visitors find the proximity of Ontario International Airport to be a County of Riverside Operational AreaMulti-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 64 | Section 2metropolitan advantage yet enjoy the small-town, neighborly charm of our young community. 2.6.11 Hemet The City of Hemet is located in the San Jacinto Valley in Riverside County, approximately 80 miles southeast of Downtown Los Angeles. The city covers about half of the valley, which it shares with the neighboring City of San Jacinto to the north and Diamond Valley Lake to the south. The San Jacinto Mountains to north provide a beautiful natural backdrop to the City. The average annual rainfall in Hemet is approximately 12 inches. The annual high temperature is 82 degrees while the annual low is 46 degrees. Average temperature in Hemet is 65 degrees. During the 19th century the land in Hemet was used for cattle ranching by Mission San Luis Rey. On January 20, 1910, the City of Hemet was incorporated and maintains a Council-Manager form of government. The incorporation helped to serve the growing city which also became a trading center for the San Jacinto Valley agriculture of citrus, apricots, peaches, olives, and walnuts. During WWII the City of Hemet hosted the Ryan School of Aeronautics, training over 6,000 fliers for the Army Air Force. Hemet-Ryan Airport still exists today in the same location. 2.6.12 Indian Wells Indian Wells is a small-scale residential-resort community located within the Coachella Valley in Riverside County. The City of La Quinta and the City of Palm Desert, along with unincorporated areas of Riverside County, adjoin the City. The current City limits encompass approximately 9,240 acres, or 14.4 square miles. Primary access to the City is from State Highway 111. Primary access to the region is by Interstate 10. State Route 74 also provides access to the Coachella Valley region from the south. Unincorporated lands to the northeast of the City are included within the Indian Wells sphere of influence. Indian Wells is best known for its world class resorts, catering to golf and tennis enthusiasts, and quality residential lifestyle. Residents of the City enjoy an ideal climate, with over 330 days of sunshine each year. The City’s beautiful surroundings include views of the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains. Indian Wells officially became a city on July 14, 1967. At that time, Indian Wells was the 16th city to incorporate in Riverside County and the 400th in California. It was the fourth city, after Indio, Coachella, and Palm Springs, to incorporate in the Coachella Valley. The election for incorporation was held on June 27, 1967, and according to the League of California Cities, had the largest percentage of approval for incorporation of any city in California. The voter turnout was 87 percent of the 285 registered voters with 93 percent County of Riverside Operational Area
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 65 | Section 2in favor of becoming a city. At incorporation, there were an estimated 855 legal residents and 585 homes. The Indian Wells area was inhabited long before incorporation, however. The name Indian Wells originated from a Cahuilla Indian hand-dug well, documented on the earliest maps of California prior to 1850. The original well was generally located north of present-day Highway 111 and east of Miles Avenue. The well serves as a stage station until a public well was established around 1870 and remained in use until 1910. Like most communities that were established in the Coachella Valley, Indian Wells’ origins are based on travelers’ needs for water and a place to rest. Both wells were destroyed by a massive flood in 1916. 2.6.13 Indio The City of Indio is a corporate city located in Riverside County, within the Coachella Valley of Southern California's Colorado Desert region, approximately 70 miles east of the County seat (City of Riverside), and 125 miles east of Los Angeles. The City limits encompass approximately 29.2 square miles in area. The City of Indio sits directly adjacent to the City of La Quinta, the City of Coachella, and the unincorporated areas of Riverside County. The Union Pacific Railroad, State Highway 111, and Interstate 10 run through the length of the City. The Coachella Valley Water District operates an aqueduct which conveys water from the Colorado River into the Coachella Valley and bisects the City from east to west and north to south. The climate of the City of Indio is influenced by the surrounding mountain ranges that contribute to the unique year-round warm and dry climate, with some of the warmest winters west of the Rocky Mountains. Indio experiences warm winters and hot summer climates with average annual high temperatures of 89.5 degrees Fahrenheit, and average annual low of 62.1 Fahrenheit. Summer highs above 110 degrees Fahrenheit are common while summer night lows often stay above 90 degrees Fahrenheit. The City of Indio is adjacent to the geologic Salton Sink and within the site of historic Lake Cahuilla. Indio is an official National Bird Sanctuary, as seasonal bird migration flight routes cross the city in route to and from the Salton Sea. Indio began as an Indian Village and winter home for Native Americans who regularly migrated from the surrounding mountains in the winter to the palm oases along the San Andreas Fault zone and other locations providing water, vegetation, and shelter. The Villages were located throughout the Coachella Valley and along the shores of ancient Lake Cahuilla. The discovery of gold in California in 1848 and the resulting Gold Rush brought a stream of miners and settlers through the Coachella Valley, providing a southern route to California less hazardous than crossing the Sierras. In 1872, Indio was selected as a division point for the Southern Pacific Railroad with the first train arriving in 1876 from Los Angeles and the completed southern transcontinental route in 1877. Indio's County of Riverside Operational AreaMulti-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 66 | Section 2first settlers were mainly railroad employees and local shopkeepers. By 1909, the Indio School census indicated that the school district had 43 families and 82 children within its boundaries. In 1914 the Southern Sierras Power Company completed an electric power line to the Coachella Valley to provide power for pumping water and powering homes. In 1930, Indio became the Coachella Valley's first incorporated city. 2.6.14 Jurupa Valley The City of Jurupa Valley is the newest city to incorporate within the State of California, in the County of Riverside, with an incorporation date of July 1, 2011. Jurupa Valley is approximately 44 square miles in area and is approximately 5 miles west of the County seat, the City of Riverside. Jurupa Valley is approximately 60 miles east of the City of Los Angeles and approximately 90 miles north of San Diego. It covers the area north and west of the Santa Ana River, south of the Riverside-San Bernardino County line, and east of Interstate 15 with CA Hwy 60 intersecting the length of the city from the east to the west. The City of Jurupa Valley has a moderate climate with annual rainfall at approximately 2 – 3.5 inches per year. Vegetation is green and bountiful in the winter but can become dry and dense during the summer months. Summers are warm and can reach temperatures above 109 degrees during the peak of the day and remain in the high 80’s during the evenings. Winter weather is mild averaging 65 – 76 degrees during the day and dropping down into the mid 30’s or 40’s in the evenings. Throughout most of the year, you can usually count on warm sunny days, with occasional mild to gusty winds throughout the late summer, fall, and early winter seasons. The population of Jurupa Valley was incorporated after the 2010 US State Census. Currently, the city’s population is 100,314 according to the 2015 US State Census. 2.6.15 Lake Elsinore The City of Lake Elsinore is a corporate city nestled at the foot of the Cleveland National Forest, within the southwest portion of Riverside County. The City boasts that Lake Elsinore is the largest natural recreational lake in Southern California and is bounded by wetlands. City of Lake Elsinore is located on the I-15 corridor at the intersection of State Route 74, 20 miles south of State Route 91. The City is about a 30-minute drive to metropolitan Orange County and forty-five minutes southwest from Riverside. San Diego is about a 75-minute drive south on I-15. Highway 74 connects westward over the Ortega Mountains to Orange County beach communities and eastward to mountain and desert cities in Riverside County. Lake Elsinore is 73 miles southeast of Los Angeles and 74 miles northeast of San Diego. The average rainfall per year is less than 12 inches total. The average winter low temperature is 35.8 degrees, while the average summer high is 98.4 degrees. The community enjoys a yearly average daily temperature of 78.5 degrees.

County of Riverside Operational Area
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 67 | Section 2The City of City of Lake Elsinore was organized, formed and incorporated under the laws of the State of California on April 9, 1888. From earliest times, the 300 natural Sulphur springs that fed Lake Elsinore were believed to have curative and magical properties by its Native American Indian inhabitants. These first inhabitants were called the Lake Entengvo Wumoma, which meant "Hot Springs by the Little Sea." Joining the Native American Indian inhabitants, the Spanish missionaries, soldiers, ranchers, and American trappers came to the valley. The Spanish padres renamed the lake "Laguna Grande." Early settlers established a town site around the lake, which they renamed Elsinore, representing the immortality given the town of Elsinore in Denmark by Shakespeare in "Hamlet." In the 1920s and 1930s, the City became a playground for movie stars and the lake a destination for world-record-setting boat races and Olympic swim team training. Sportsmen hunted duck on the lake and deer in the hills. Lake Elsinore has a “Council-Manager” general law form of government where the City Manager is appointed by the City Council and is the Chief Executive Officer of the Municipal Corporation. The Council acts as the board of directors of the municipal corporation and meets in a public forum where citizens may participate in the governmental process. The City Council consists of five members elected at-large, on a non-partisan basis. Residents elect the mayor and four council members, making each accountable to the entire citizenry. 2.6.16 La Quinta La Quinta is situated approximately 150 miles northeast of San Diego and 130 miles east of Los Angeles on the desert floor of the Coachella Valley. The valley is flanked on three sides by the Little San Bernardino, Santa Rosa, and San Jacinto Mountains. The protection afforded by the mountains contributes to the arid climate. Average rainfall per year is less than 5 inches total. Low temperatures rarely drop below freezing, while highs during the summer are usually in the triple digits and can reach a dry heat of 120 F degrees. Visitors from colder climates come to La Quinta and surrounding cities in the Coachella Valley from November to May because of our extremely mild winters. La Quinta’s climate can be described as Lower California desert.The City of La Quinta was organized, formed and incorporated under the laws of the State of California on May 1, 1982. It has a “Council-Manager” general law form of government where the City Manager is appointed by the City Council and is the Chief Executive Officer of the Municipal Corporation. The Council acts as the board of directors of the municipal corporation and meets in a public forum where citizens may participate in the governmental process. The City Council consists of five members elected at-large, on a County of Riverside Operational AreaMulti-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 68 | Section 2non-partisan basis. Residents elect the mayor and four council members, making each accountable to the entire citizenry. 2.6.17 Menifee The City of Menifee is in southwestern Riverside County approximately 30 miles southeast of the City of Riverside, California. The City encompasses approximately 50 square miles with an overall population of 83,447. On June 3, 2008, the residents of the communities encompassing the City of Menifee voted to incorporate Menifee into Riverside County's twenty-sixth city. The new City of Menifee was officially established on October 1, 2008. Interstate 215 traverses north and south through the center of Menifee, with existing community commercial areas located primarily along Newport, Bradley, and McCall Roads off of I-215. 2.6.18 Moreno Valley The City of Moreno Valley was officially incorporated on December 3, 1984, as a California general law municipality. Moreno Valley is comprised of three once-rural communities (Sunnymead, Edgemont and Moreno) and is located in the northwestern portion of Riverside County, approximately 66 miles east of Los Angeles, 42 miles west of Palm Springs and 100 miles north of San Diego. Moreno Valley is situated in a crescent of land bounded by the Box Springs Mountains to the north, the hills of the Badlands to the east and the mountains of Lake Perris State Recreation Area. The surrounding jurisdictions include the City of Riverside, the City of Perris, March Air Reserve Base, the San Jacinto Wildlife Area, and Lake Perris State Recreation Area. The population of Moreno Valley is estimated at 201,175. 2.6.19 Murrieta The City of Murrieta is approximately 34 square miles in area and is 50 miles south of the County seat, the City of Riverside. The City of Murrieta sits directly adjacent to the City of Temecula on the south, City of Menifee on the east, and the City of Wildomar on the northern boundaries. Murrieta is served by two major interstate freeways. I-215 runs through the eastern portion of the city, and I-15 runs through the western portion of the city. The Santa Margarita Watershed runs through the southwest portion of the City. Storm water runoff from portions of Lake Elsinore and Murrieta collects in the Murrieta & Temecula creeks and forms the Santa Margarita River south of the City. The City of Murrieta’s winters are almost never extreme, low temperatures rarely go below freezing. In the summer the high temperatures will hover in the 90's, but some days may County of Riverside Operational Area
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 69 | Section 2go over 100 during heat waves. Rainfall for City of Murrieta is typical of that of the rest of Riverside County. In 1980, Murrieta population was estimated to be 2,200. When Murrieta officially became a city on July 1, 1991, it was already home to more than 24,000 residents. By 2016, more than 113,000 people had moved into the City of Murrieta community, making it one of the five largest in Riverside County. The natural scenic beauty of the area and what is still by California standards reasonably priced housing continues to attract significant numbers of residents and businesses who are finding Murrieta a great place to grow. Those living in the community find distinguished schools, abundant recreation, excellent medical facilities, expanding employment opportunities and one of the lowest crime rates in Southern California. Entrepreneurs find a market growing larger by the day, above average household incomes, a skilled labor force and a business-friendly City Hall. It’s a community with a past and vision for its future. One that welcomes challenges embraces opportunity. More and more people are discovering what the Murrieta fathers envisioned more than a century ago: Murrieta is, indeed, a great place to grow. 2.6.20 Norco The City of Norco is located in the northwestern portion of Riverside County, near the convergence of Los Angeles, Orange, and Riverside Counties, approximately 45 miles southeast of the City of Los Angeles. It is located in a valley, framed by mountains and the Prado Basin. Original Settlements focused development in an area within and adjacent to Hamner Avenue, Highway. As the City grew, the geographic limitations imposed by the Norco Hills to the east and the Santa Ana River and the Prado Basin to the north and west created natural barriers that confined the City. The City is bordered by the City of Corona to the south and southwest, the City of Riverside to the east, and the cities of Eastvale and Jurupa Valley to the north and northeast. One major freeway transects Norco with no railroads. Interstate 15 (I-15) runs north/south through the middle of the City. This corridor is the major north-south transportation route in Southern California between Las Vegas and San Diego with nearby direct freeway interconnects to Los Angeles and Orange counties and the rest of the Inland Empire. The current City corporate limits are fairly congruous with the City’s Sphere of Influence (SOI). The City currently includes 15 square miles, with less than 50 acres currently in Riverside County remaining within the SOI. The SOI was defined by the City, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), and the Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO). It represents those areas likely to be served by and potentially annexed to the City. The SOI includes two small geographically distinct areas including a single row of mostly developed single-family homes along Bluff Street at the City’s southwestern edge along County of Riverside Operational AreaMulti-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 70 | Section 2the river bluffs and undeveloped property largely in the river floodplain in the northeast corner of the City. The City currently manages approximately 690 acres of open space within its Park Lands and an internal trail system throughout the City and its public right away of approximately 120 miles. The City of Norco Planning area is within the South Coast Air Basin of California. The air basin is a 6,600-square mile area encompassing the non-desert portions of Riverside, Los Angeles, and San Bernardino Counties and all of Orange County. Bounded by the Pacific Ocean to the west and the San Gabriel, San Bernardino, and San Jacinto Mountains to the north and east, the South Coast Air Basin is an area of high air pollution potential. The climate of the South Coast Air Basin is dominated by the strength and position of the semi-permanent high-pressure center over the Pacific Ocean near Hawaii. It creates the climate conditions typical of Southern California, (i.e., relatively cool summers, mild winters, infrequent rainfall, cool daytime sea breezes, comfortable humidity, and ample sunshine). Periods of extremely hot weather, winter storms, or Santa Ana wind conditions interrupt this pattern. Unfortunately, the same atmospheric processes that create the desirable living climate combines to restrict the ability of the atmosphere to disperse the air pollution generated by the region’s population.The location of the Planning Area, east of the Chino Hills and Santa Ana Mountains farther south, insulates it from the moderating effect of the ocean. Temperatures and precipitation in Norco vary more dramatically than coastal areas of the basin. Average summertime high temperatures range between about 85 to 92 degrees Fahrenheit from June through September, and average wintertime low temperatures are generally near 40 degrees in December and January. Rainfall is highly variable and confined almost exclusively to the winter months. Rainfall in Norco averages about 12.6 inches annually. Predominating winds travel from the ocean, across the urbanized coastal areas of Orange and Los Angeles Counties, to Norco through the Santa Ana River Canyon. The canyon acts as a funnel for air masses moving across the basin. Daytime winds are typically channeled through the canyon to create steady, abnormally high (greater than 12mph) wind velocities from the west. Typical nighttime conditions reverse, and light winds (less than 1 mph) drift back towards the ocean. Exceptions to this pattern occur when a highpressure center forms over the western United States and creates the strong, hot, dry, gusty Santa Ana winds, which move through Norco from the eastern deserts into the canyon. The pre-European history of Norco is much like the rest of Southern California where various tribes of Indians occupied the different portions of the region. The Luiseno Indians used and occupied a region that included the Norco-Corona area. The main village was in Temescal Canyon, and the Norco area was used as a hunting-gathering location. In 1846 the Norco area became part of the Mexican land grant, part of which was eventually County of Riverside Operational Area
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 71 | Section 2purchased for the purposed of growing orange trees. That was not successful, and the land was sold and subdivided as part of the Riverside Orange Heights Tract. The concept of “Norco” began as a subdivision of the North Corona Land Company in 1910, which again attempted to develop the area with orchard citrus crops, avocados, olives, etc. Years of experimentation showed the area was not suited to that purpose due to high winds, frost, and poor soil conditions. In 1921 the property was sold to the North Corona Land Company. At that time, fewer than 100 families resided in the area which was mainly a small farming community. The farmers gradually ventured into animal raising, especially poultry and rabbits, some of which are still active today. By the mid-1920’s, the North Corona Land Company owned 5,409 acres in the area. When the first school and the Norconian Club were constructed, the Norconian Club was constructed at hot sulfur well discovered while digging for irrigation water. It occupied a 700- acre site and was for years a favorite of Hollywood celebrities. Its use declined during the 1930’s and in 1941 the U.S. Navy bought the hotel and expanded it into a premier World War II-era hospital. Today, its grounds are divided between a weapons research facility and a state prison. Most of the resort remains intact, and its history and architecture have earned it a listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Today local leaders and organizations are working to ensure its recognition and preservation. The community’s first public recreational facility was developed in 1948 when the old Norco School was acquired as a community center. The Norco Recreation and Park District was then formed to maintain and operate the property. During the 1950’s and 1960’s Norco began to experience more growth, resulting from the population explosion occurring throughout the Southern California metropolitan area. The San Bernardino and Riverside freeways made the area more accessible from Los Angeles and Orange Counties, and Norco’s animal keeping lifestyle came within commuting distance from major centers of employment. Because of rapid growth in surrounding communities, and the previous loss of other animal keeping communities in the Los Angeles and Orange Counties when development pressures increased there, the City of Norco was incorporated in 1964 to preserve the animal keeping community that had established roots here. The development of the 130 acres of Silverlakes Equestrian and Sports Park along Hamner Avenue, between Norco and Eastvale, is currently attracting over 1 million visitors annually to the city and the region. The dominant activity in the park is soccer supplemented by equestrian horse competition. City of Norco is located in the northwestern portion of Riverside County. The City of Norco is surrounded by the City of Eastvale, Corona and Riverside. During the late 50‘s and early 60’s, southern California experienced rapid growth and due to the previous loss of County of Riverside Operational AreaMulti-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 72 | Section 2other animal keeping communities in the Los Angeles and Orange Counties areas, the City of Norco was incorporated in 1964 to preserve the animal keeping community. The City of Norco currently includes 14.3 square miles. The current population is approximately 27,336. 2.6.21 Palm Desert The City of Palm Desert is a charter city in Riverside County. The City of Palm Desert is a business, resort, and residential community centrally located in the heart of the Coachella Valley, in southeastern Riverside County, California. Known as the cultural and retail center of the desert communities, the City is 125 miles east of Los Angeles and just 15 miles east of Palm Springs. The valley is flanked on three sides by the Little San Bernardino, Santa Rosa, and San Jacinto Mountains. The protection afforded by the mountains contributes to the arid climate. Average rainfall per year is less than four inches. Low temperatures rarely drop below freezing, while highs during the summer are usually in the triple digits and can reach 115-120 degrees Fahrenheit; however, it’s a “dry” heat, with occasional periods of high humidity in the late summer months. Visitors from colder climates flock to Palm Desert and surrounding cities in the Coachella Valley from November to May because of the extremely mild winters. The City of Palm Desert incorporated as a charter city on November 26, 1973. It has a “Council-Manager” charter city form of government where the City Manager is appointed by the City Council and is the Chief Executive Officer of the Municipal Corporation. The Council acts as the board of directors of the municipal corporation and meets in a public forum where citizens may participate in the governmental process. The City Council consists of five members elected at-large, on a non-partisan basis. 2.6.22 Palm Springs The City of Palm Springs is a charter city in Riverside County located in the State of California. The City is nestled at the base of the San Jacinto and Santa Rosa Mountains, approximately 60 miles east of Riverside. Serving as the “gateway city” for the Coachella Valley, the City of Palm Springs comprises an incorporated area that encompasses 60,440 acres, or nearly 95 square miles. Palm Springs has a residential population of approximately 47,371 and an estimated seasonal population of over a 100,000 residents and guests. The City of Palm Springs is located within Riverside County Region VI Southern Administrative Region of the California Office of Emergency Services Agency (Cal OES). Primary access to the City is provided by Interstate 10 and California State Highway 111; north–south access to the City is provided via Indian Canyon Drive and County of Riverside Operational Area
Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan April 2023 EMD 5.1.25 73 | Section 2Gene Autry Trail. The Southern Pacific Railroad and Kinder Morgan natural gas pipeline run through the Coachella Valley and specifically through the City’s northern boundary.Palm Springs has an arid desert climate with annual rainfall of less than six inches. There are more than one hundred days a year when temperatures are 100°F or more. Hot, dry winds during the summer months along with seasonal Santa Ana winds are common to Palm Springs. The San Andreas Fault is a major earthquake fault located only a few miles north of Palm Springs. In addition, there are numerous minor faults located throughout Riverside County which are subject to earthquakes. The area encompassing the present City of Palm Springs was discovered centuries ago by the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, who established their village around the natural hot mineral springs (current site of the Spa Resort Casino) known for their medicinal and healing capabilities. Throughout the 19th century, many explorers, colonizers, and soldiers came through the desert, but it wasn’t until 1853 that United States Topographical Engineers described the combination of palm trees and warm springs they encountered as “Palm Springs.” The name became more commonly used several years later. In 1877, the Southern Pacific Railroad completed its line through the desert to the Pacific Ocean. A Congressional policy established that every odd section of land for 10 miles on either side if the track become the property of the railroad. Early development in Palm Springs was associated with attempts to establish agricultural activity in the area and in the southern portions of the Coachella Valley. In the 1920s, the region became a retreat for successful business and movie personalities, who took advantage of the warm weather, the remote location, and the hot water spas. The tourist and resort community of Palm Springs developed over the following decades and dramatically changed the character and economy of the Coachella Valley. In 1938, the City of Palm Springs was officially incorporated. In the 1950s, about 3000 sections of land were transferred to the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians in a checkerboard pattern. The checkerboard pattern is divided into Indian and non-Indian property holdings, based upon a grid pattern of square-mile sections of alternating ownerships. Indian land which has been subdivided into sections, half sections, and sometimes even smaller areas—is controlled by the Tribal Council or by individual allottees of the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (the Tribe). Over time, this checkerboard land-ownership pattern has led to inconsistent patterns of development since the majority of development has occurred on non-Indian and nonTribal owned lands.

San Jacinto City CouncilJune 16, 2026

San Jacinto City Council
June 16, 2026