Exhibit D - Initial Study-MND and Appendices — San Jose City Council, August 9, 2022 (part 2 of 10)

Alviso Hotel, San Jose - Santa Clara County, Annual
Alviso Hotel, San Jose
Santa Clara County, Annual
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 6.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - BMPs, Tier 3 mitigationEnergy Mitigation - SJCE is the electrciity provider in San Jose. Will provide 100% carbon free electricity from 2021 on Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
Trips and VMT - o Trips Post-model computation with EMFAC2017, building const = est 100 cement total round trips, paving = 200cy asphalt Vehicle Trips - provided traffic, hotel trip gen rate with reduction = 7.64, 7.66, 5.56Vehicle Emission Factors - EMFAC2017 Santa Clara County 2023 Emissions FactorsWoodstoves - Energy Use - Water And Wastewater - WWTP 100% aerobicOff-road Equipment - Provided construction equip & hours 9/8/2020Off-road Equipment - Provided construction equip & hours 9/8/2020Off-road Equipment - Provided construction equip & hours 9/8/2020Off-road Equipment - Provided construction equip & hours 9/8/2020Grading - grading = 900cy importDemolition - tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 0.02
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 2/26/2022 1/15/2022 tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 0.02
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 3/13/2021 7/1/2021tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 1/29/2022 5/15/2022tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 3/25/2022 5/15/2022tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 2/13/2021 2/15/2021tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 1/28/2022 1/15/2022tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 2/25/2022 5/25/2022tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 2/12/2021 2/15/2021tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 3/12/2021 4/15/2021tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 8.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 85.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 44.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 230.00 142.00 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 11.00
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 FinaltblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblFleetMix MCY 5.2800e-003 5.1323e-003
tblFleetMix LHD2 5.0110e-003 5.2522e-003tblFleetMix MCY 5.2800e-003 5.1323e-003tblFleetMix LHD2 5.0110e-003 5.2522e-003tblFleetMix LHD2 5.0110e-003 5.2522e-003tblFleetMix LHD2 5.0110e-003 5.2522e-003tblFleetMix LHD2 5.0110e-003 5.2522e-003tblFleetMix LHD1 0.01 0.02tblFleetMix LHD1 0.01 0.02tblFleetMix LHD1 0.01 0.02tblFleetMix LHD1 0.01 0.02tblFleetMix LDT2 0.18 0.18tblFleetMix LHD1 0.01 0.02tblFleetMix LDT2 0.18 0.18tblFleetMix LDT2 0.18 0.18tblFleetMix LDT2 0.18 0.18tblFleetMix LDT2 0.18 0.18tblFleetMix LDT1 0.04 0.05tblFleetMix LDT1 0.04 0.05tblFleetMix LDT1 0.04 0.05tblFleetMix LDT1 0.04 0.05tblFleetMix LDA 0.61 0.59tblFleetMix LDT1 0.04 0.05tblFleetMix LDA 0.61 0.59tblFleetMix LDA 0.61 0.59tblFleetMix LDA 0.61 0.59tblFleetMix LDA 0.61 0.59tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 0.02tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 0.02tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 0.02 tblFleetMix UBUS 1.5290e-003 1.2609e-003
tblFleetMix SBUS 6.2900e-004 9.2340e-004tblFleetMix UBUS 1.5290e-003 1.2609e-003tblFleetMix SBUS 6.2900e-004 9.2340e-004tblFleetMix SBUS 6.2900e-004 9.2340e-004tblFleetMix SBUS 6.2900e-004 9.2340e-004tblFleetMix SBUS 6.2900e-004 9.2340e-004tblFleetMix OBUS 2.1680e-003 1.6221e-003tblFleetMix OBUS 2.1680e-003 1.6221e-003tblFleetMix OBUS 2.1680e-003 1.6221e-003tblFleetMix OBUS 2.1680e-003 1.6221e-003tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 0.01tblFleetMix OBUS 2.1680e-003 1.6221e-003tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 0.01tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 0.01tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 0.01tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 0.01tblFleetMix MH 7.2000e-004 7.5923e-004tblFleetMix MH 7.2000e-004 7.5923e-004tblFleetMix MH 7.2000e-004 7.5923e-004tblFleetMix MH 7.2000e-004 7.5923e-004tblFleetMix MDV 0.11 0.11tblFleetMix MH 7.2000e-004 7.5923e-004tblFleetMix MDV 0.11 0.11tblFleetMix MDV 0.11 0.11tblFleetMix MDV 0.11 0.11tblFleetMix MDV 0.11 0.11tblFleetMix MCY 5.2800e-003 5.1323e-003tblFleetMix MCY 5.2800e-003 5.1323e-003tblFleetMix MCY 5.2800e-003 5.1323e-003 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 4.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 1.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 1.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 1.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 1.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Aerial LiftstblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Tractors/Loaders/BackhoestblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Sweepers/ScrubberstblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Other General Industrial EquipmenttblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Tractors/Loaders/BackhoestblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType ExcavatorstblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.37 0.37tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Sweepers/ScrubberstblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.38tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.46 0.46 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.53 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.37 0.37
tblLandUse LotAcreage 1.73 0.00tblLandUse LotAcreage 7.17 1.92tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 312,180.00 108,702.00tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.39 0.00 tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 900.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 76,800.00 70,757.00
tblFleetMix UBUS 1.5290e-003 1.2609e-003tblFleetMix UBUS 1.5290e-003 1.2609e-003tblFleetMix UBUS 1.5290e-003 1.2609e-003 tblVehicleEF HHD 0.91 0.40
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.08 0.00tblVehicleEF HHD 1.61 6.34tblVehicleEF HHD 0.34 0.02tblVehicleEF HHD 0.05 0.05 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 13.00 0.00tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 34.00 0.00tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 13.00 0.00tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 171.00 0.00tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 8.00 0.00tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 5.00 0.00tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 113.00 0.00tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 67.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 0.00
tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 641.35 210 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 1.10tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 2.70tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 2.70tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 1.70tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 2.60tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 1.10tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 2.60tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 2.60tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 0.30tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 0.70tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 3.40tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 2.90tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 3.40tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD 0.48 0.49
tblVehicleEF HHD 9.8000e-005 3.0000e-006tblVehicleEF HHD 5.1360e-003 1.1600e-004tblVehicleEF HHD 0.01 0.01tblVehicleEF HHD 1.7800e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF HHD 0.09 3.0000e-006tblVehicleEF HHD 0.04 9.9140e-003tblVehicleEF HHD 0.09 0.03tblVehicleEF HHD 4.1700e-004 5.9400e-004tblVehicleEF HHD 0.42 0.43tblVehicleEF HHD 6.1000e-005 1.0000e-006tblVehicleEF HHD 9.8000e-005 3.0000e-006tblVehicleEF HHD 5.1360e-003 1.1600e-004tblVehicleEF HHD 5.9180e-003 0.02tblVehicleEF HHD 9.7000e-005 1.0000e-006tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.03tblVehicleEF HHD 8.8320e-003 8.8780e-003tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0500e-004 1.0000e-006tblVehicleEF HHD 7.7170e-003 2.5550e-003tblVehicleEF HHD 0.04 0.04tblVehicleEF HHD 6.1860e-003 0.02tblVehicleEF HHD 8.0650e-003 2.6700e-003tblVehicleEF HHD 0.06 0.06tblVehicleEF HHD 1.98 2.68tblVehicleEF HHD 19.39 2.32tblVehicleEF HHD 11.75 0.05tblVehicleEF HHD 13.99 5.44tblVehicleEF HHD 4,386.48 1,065.38tblVehicleEF HHD 1,557.95 1,436.68tblVehicleEF HHD 3.69 5.9190e-003 tblVehicleEF LDA 0.07 0.23
tblVehicleEF LDA 0.01 0.01tblVehicleEF LDA 0.04 0.20tblVehicleEF LDA 0.09 0.09tblVehicleEF LDA 0.02 0.03tblVehicleEF LDA 5.6900e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF LDA 0.03 0.04tblVehicleEF LDA 0.06 0.21tblVehicleEF LDA 2.3450e-003 9.3000e-005tblVehicleEF LDA 8.4470e-003 7.4590e-003tblVehicleEF LDA 0.04 0.20tblVehicleEF LDA 0.09 0.09tblVehicleEF LDA 0.02 0.03tblVehicleEF LDA 2.0520e-003 1.6040e-003tblVehicleEF LDA 0.03 0.04tblVehicleEF LDA 2.2310e-003 1.7440e-003tblVehicleEF LDA 1.4980e-003 1.2490e-003tblVehicleEF LDA 0.06 0.18tblVehicleEF LDA 1.6260e-003 1.3560e-003tblVehicleEF LDA 55.12 52.02tblVehicleEF LDA 0.04 0.03tblVehicleEF LDA 1.08 2.16tblVehicleEF LDA 234.26 245.28tblVehicleEF LDA 4.7330e-003 0.05tblVehicleEF LDA 0.50 0.56tblVehicleEF HHD 0.10 3.0000e-006tblVehicleEF LDA 3.3580e-003 1.9580e-003tblVehicleEF HHD 0.15 0.08tblVehicleEF HHD 4.1700e-004 5.9400e-004tblVehicleEF HHD 6.1000e-005 1.0000e-006 tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.42 2.79
tblVehicleEF LDT2 6.4640e-003 0.07tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.68 0.79tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.16 0.34tblVehicleEF LDT2 4.9930e-003 3.2450e-003tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.03 0.03tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.15 0.58tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.21 0.16tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.06 0.07tblVehicleEF LDT1 7.2200e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.08 0.08tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.15 0.31tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.9360e-003 2.6160e-003tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.02 0.02tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.15 0.58tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.21 0.16tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.06 0.07tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.6840e-003 2.0630e-003tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.08 0.08tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.9190e-003 2.2440e-003tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.0100e-003 1.6250e-003tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.13 0.23tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.1830e-003 1.7660e-003tblVehicleEF LDT1 68.20 62.87tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.10 0.08tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.29 2.35tblVehicleEF LDT1 292.52 292.91tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.01 0.06tblVehicleEF LDT1 1.00 0.95tblVehicleEF LDT1 7.8390e-003 4.1630e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD1 687.79 794.16
tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.58 1.08tblVehicleEF LHD1 8.98 8.94tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.15 0.19tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.02 0.77tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 8.5450e-003tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.02tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.10 0.34tblVehicleEF LHD1 5.3570e-003 5.1620e-003tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.02 0.02tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.07 0.42tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.10 0.12tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.04 0.06tblVehicleEF LDT2 7.9700e-004 9.3000e-005tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.04 0.06tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.09 0.31tblVehicleEF LDT2 3.3280e-003 0.01tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.01 0.01tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.07 0.42tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.10 0.12tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.04 0.06tblVehicleEF LDT2 2.0990e-003 1.6050e-003tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.04 0.06tblVehicleEF LDT2 2.2820e-003 1.7450e-003tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.5110e-003 1.2790e-003tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.11 0.27tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.6420e-003 1.3890e-003tblVehicleEF LDT2 77.35 68.58tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.07 0.07tblVehicleEF LDT2 332.30 316.76 tblVehicleEF LHD2 3.3720e-003 3.1550e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.32 0.52tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.29 0.08tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.3460e-003 1.0320e-003tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.15 0.11tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.10 0.08tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.03tblVehicleEF LHD1 3.7100e-004 1.1700e-004tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.6370e-003 2.0240e-003tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.0000e-005 8.7000e-005tblVehicleEF LHD1 6.7510e-003 7.7550e-003tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.32 0.52tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.26 0.08tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.3460e-003 1.0320e-003tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.12 0.09tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.10 0.08tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.02tblVehicleEF LHD1 8.7800e-004 2.3700e-004tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.6370e-003 2.0240e-003tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.5220e-003 2.4370e-003tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 9.7200e-003tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.5500e-004 2.5800e-004tblVehicleEF LHD1 8.2300e-004 7.9000e-004tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 9.7470e-003tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 0.01tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.99 0.32tblVehicleEF LHD1 8.6000e-004 8.2500e-004tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.07 0.06tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.10 0.73tblVehicleEF LHD1 32.26 11.83 tblVehicleEF LHD2 8.1500e-004 1.0700e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 6.8630e-003 7.4240e-003tblVehicleEF LHD2 2.6100e-004 7.8000e-005tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.09 0.04tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.3600e-004 1.3400e-004tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.10 0.11tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.07 0.28tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.01 0.02tblVehicleEF LHD2 4.3700e-004 5.4700e-004tblVehicleEF LHD2 8.1500e-004 1.0700e-003tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.03 0.04tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.01 0.01tblVehicleEF LHD2 3.8300e-004 1.2300e-004tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.1880e-003 1.3610e-003tblVehicleEF LHD2 2.6910e-003 2.6880e-003tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.01 0.02tblVehicleEF LHD2 4.1600e-004 1.3300e-004tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.2420e-003 1.4230e-003tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.01 0.01tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.69 0.88tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.44 0.18tblVehicleEF LHD2 24.06 7.83tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.10 0.10tblVehicleEF LHD2 13.98 14.00tblVehicleEF LHD2 705.76 768.73tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.55 0.62tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.16 0.63tblVehicleEF LHD2 6.7190e-003 8.4310e-003tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.12 0.14tblVehicleEF LHD2 7.5730e-003 7.0600e-003 tblVehicleEF MCY 2.73 2.74
tblVehicleEF MCY 0.70 0.69tblVehicleEF MCY 0.49 0.99tblVehicleEF MCY 6.8300e-004 6.0400e-004tblVehicleEF MCY 0.90 1.81tblVehicleEF MCY 2.20 1.94tblVehicleEF MCY 2.0680e-003 2.0800e-003tblVehicleEF MCY 2.20 2.21tblVehicleEF MCY 0.60 1.97tblVehicleEF MCY 0.70 0.69tblVehicleEF MCY 0.49 0.99tblVehicleEF MCY 3.5160e-003 2.8590e-003tblVehicleEF MCY 0.90 1.81tblVehicleEF MCY 3.7340e-003 3.0390e-003tblVehicleEF MCY 1.8770e-003 1.8400e-003tblVehicleEF MCY 0.32 0.27tblVehicleEF MCY 2.0080e-003 1.9690e-003tblVehicleEF MCY 45.14 61.04tblVehicleEF MCY 1.15 1.15tblVehicleEF MCY 10.18 9.03tblVehicleEF MCY 169.68 210.17tblVehicleEF MCY 0.16 0.26tblVehicleEF MCY 18.74 18.87tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.10 0.05tblVehicleEF MCY 0.45 0.33tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.12 0.13tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.07 0.28tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.02tblVehicleEF LHD2 4.3700e-004 5.4700e-004tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.03 0.04 tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF MDV 0.22 0.42tblVehicleEF MH 0.03 0.01tblVehicleEF MDV 0.03 0.02tblVehicleEF MDV 0.11 0.44tblVehicleEF MDV 0.16 0.14tblVehicleEF MDV 0.06 0.07tblVehicleEF MDV 1.0640e-003 8.0200e-004tblVehicleEF MDV 0.06 0.07tblVehicleEF MDV 0.20 0.38tblVehicleEF MDV 4.4500e-003 3.7430e-003tblVehicleEF MDV 0.02 0.02tblVehicleEF MDV 0.11 0.44tblVehicleEF MDV 0.16 0.14tblVehicleEF MDV 0.06 0.07tblVehicleEF MDV 2.2840e-003 1.7560e-003tblVehicleEF MDV 0.06 0.07tblVehicleEF MDV 2.4830e-003 1.9090e-003tblVehicleEF MDV 1.6590e-003 1.3930e-003tblVehicleEF MDV 0.23 0.32tblVehicleEF MDV 1.8000e-003 1.5110e-003tblVehicleEF MDV 101.69 82.02tblVehicleEF MDV 0.13 0.08tblVehicleEF MDV 2.68 3.13tblVehicleEF MDV 444.47 383.41tblVehicleEF MDV 0.02 0.08tblVehicleEF MDV 1.06 0.87tblVehicleEF MCY 2.39 2.11tblVehicleEF MDV 9.4310e-003 3.9100e-003tblVehicleEF MCY 0.60 1.97 tblVehicleEF MHD 0.38 0.39
tblVehicleEF MHD 4.5180e-003 1.9320e-003tblVehicleEF MHD 0.05 9.4870e-003tblVehicleEF MH 0.35 0.11tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 3.5450e-003tblVehicleEF MH 0.12 0.09tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 1.44tblVehicleEF MH 0.07 0.06tblVehicleEF MH 0.28 0.25tblVehicleEF MH 6.8600e-004 1.8500e-004tblVehicleEF MH 0.81 0.71tblVehicleEF MH 0.32 0.10tblVehicleEF MH 0.01 0.02tblVehicleEF MH 0.09 0.07tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 1.44tblVehicleEF MH 0.07 0.06tblVehicleEF MH 0.28 0.25tblVehicleEF MH 1.0380e-003 2.5200e-004tblVehicleEF MH 0.81 0.71tblVehicleEF MH 3.2190e-003 3.2750e-003tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.02tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.02tblVehicleEF MH 1.1290e-003 2.7400e-004tblVehicleEF MH 0.81 0.25tblVehicleEF MH 0.01 0.01tblVehicleEF MH 58.85 18.68tblVehicleEF MH 1.29 1.36tblVehicleEF MH 5.58 2.13tblVehicleEF MH 1,212.08 1,532.75tblVehicleEF MH 1.96 1.11 tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.11
tblVehicleEF MHD 4.6300e-004 2.1100e-004tblVehicleEF MHD 0.05 0.02tblVehicleEF MHD 0.04 0.02tblVehicleEF MHD 0.04 0.02tblVehicleEF MHD 7.1800e-004 9.3000e-005tblVehicleEF MHD 8.9400e-004 4.1700e-004tblVehicleEF MHD 1.2790e-003 6.9600e-004tblVehicleEF MHD 0.01 0.01tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.11tblVehicleEF MHD 0.35 0.05tblVehicleEF MHD 4.6300e-004 2.1100e-004tblVehicleEF MHD 0.04 0.02tblVehicleEF MHD 0.04 0.02tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.02tblVehicleEF MHD 8.3200e-004 1.1000e-004tblVehicleEF MHD 8.9400e-004 4.1700e-004tblVehicleEF MHD 1.1800e-004 4.0900e-004tblVehicleEF MHD 2.9680e-003 6.6480e-003tblVehicleEF MHD 3.1090e-003 6.9550e-003tblVehicleEF MHD 9.0500e-004 1.1900e-004tblVehicleEF MHD 10.17 1.70tblVehicleEF MHD 1.2300e-004 4.2700e-004tblVehicleEF MHD 0.36 0.43tblVehicleEF MHD 1.11 1.44tblVehicleEF MHD 1,189.79 1,095.06tblVehicleEF MHD 61.47 9.38tblVehicleEF MHD 5.92 1.14tblVehicleEF MHD 132.71 73.35tblVehicleEF MHD 0.36 0.26 tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.1720e-003 1.0840e-003
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.01 0.01tblVehicleEF OBUS 7.5700e-004 1.5300e-004tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.31 0.09tblVehicleEF OBUS 9.6200e-004 8.7300e-004tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.04 0.03tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.03 0.18tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.03 0.05tblVehicleEF OBUS 5.1500e-004 4.8000e-004tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.1720e-003 1.0840e-003tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.02 0.02tblVehicleEF OBUS 2.5210e-003 6.7120e-003tblVehicleEF OBUS 7.4400e-004 1.3000e-004tblVehicleEF OBUS 8.0900e-004 1.4200e-004tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.8000e-005 1.1500e-004tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.9000e-005 1.2000e-004tblVehicleEF OBUS 2.6550e-003 7.0290e-003tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.88 1.44tblVehicleEF OBUS 2.72 1.09tblVehicleEF OBUS 66.88 15.48tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.21 0.37tblVehicleEF OBUS 99.56 91.93tblVehicleEF OBUS 1,293.67 1,341.74tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.44 0.47tblVehicleEF OBUS 5.01 1.90tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.03 0.02tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.24 0.57tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.01 7.0630e-003tblVehicleEF OBUS 6.3660e-003 4.0130e-003tblVehicleEF MHD 0.38 0.06 tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.4880e-003 2.2700e-004
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.04 5.2210e-003tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.97 0.24tblVehicleEF SBUS 8.2900e-004 4.2000e-005tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.4510e-003 5.3700e-004tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.6280e-003 2.7270e-003tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.03tblVehicleEF SBUS 9.0100e-004 4.6000e-005tblVehicleEF SBUS 7.7100e-003 3.7360e-003tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.01tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.03tblVehicleEF SBUS 12.10 0.81tblVehicleEF SBUS 8.0590e-003 3.9050e-003tblVehicleEF SBUS 8.47 3.53tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.71 4.87tblVehicleEF SBUS 1,051.90 1,060.99tblVehicleEF SBUS 56.07 3.98tblVehicleEF SBUS 9.75 0.70tblVehicleEF SBUS 1,109.35 347.39tblVehicleEF SBUS 8.17 2.18tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.05 0.52tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 6.3560e-003tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.08 4.7830e-003tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.34 0.10tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.83 0.05tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.05 0.03tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.03 0.18tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.05 0.06tblVehicleEF OBUS 5.1500e-004 4.8000e-004tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.02 0.02 tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.2820e-003 1.9000e-005
tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.20 5.0960e-003tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.0540e-003 1.4000e-005tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.25 0.03tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.0000e-003 8.3320e-003tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.21 5.3280e-003tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.1460e-003 1.5000e-005tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.59 0.07tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.01 0.03tblVehicleEF UBUS 9.47 0.73tblVehicleEF UBUS 14.57 0.01tblVehicleEF UBUS 2,067.88 1,597.13tblVehicleEF UBUS 103.85 1.39tblVehicleEF UBUS 4.81 10.12tblVehicleEF UBUS 7.98 0.14tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.27 1.35tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.04 1.4170e-003tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.04tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.53 0.03tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.4880e-003 2.2700e-004tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.14 0.10tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.04 5.2210e-003tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.40 0.35tblVehicleEF SBUS 7.2900e-004 3.9000e-005tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.4510e-003 5.3700e-004tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 3.3060e-003tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.01tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.04tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.48 0.03tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.11 0.09 tblWater SepticTankPercent 10.33 0.00
tblWater SepticTankPercent 10.33 0.00tblWater SepticTankPercent 10.33 0.00tblWater AnaerobicandFacultativeLagoonsPerce nt

2.21 0.00
tblWater SepticTankPercent 10.33 0.00tblWater AnaerobicandFacultativeLagoonsPerce nt

2.21 0.00
tblWater AnaerobicandFacultativeLagoonsPerce
nt

2.21 0.00
tblWater AerobicPercent 87.46 100.00tblWater AerobicPercent 87.46 100.00tblWater AerobicPercent 87.46 100.00tblWater AerobicPercent 87.46 100.00 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 7.64
tblWater AerobicPercent 87.46 100.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 7.66tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 5.56 tblVehicleEF UBUS 8.3050e-003 5.9200e-004tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.63 6.4410e-003tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.1230e-003 8.0000e-006tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.90 1.38tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.2820e-003 1.9000e-005tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.04 1.3300e-004tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.02 0.01tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.1810e-003 1.4000e-005tblVehicleEF UBUS 8.3050e-003 5.9200e-004tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.58 5.8830e-003tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.1230e-003 8.0000e-006tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.58 0.02tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.04 1.3300e-004

55.00 36.92 46.82 77.48 31.85 50.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

4.69 39.01 -12.42 0.00
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Bio- CO2
PM10

0.0135 0.0117 0.0252 3.6500e- 0.0000 43.1614 43.1614 0.0140 0.0000 43.5104 003
Maximum 0.6320 0.2188 0.3253 4.9000e- 0.0117 0.0154
004

0.0000 11.5054 11.5054 2.3700e003 0.0000 3.8800e- 0.0000 11.5646 003 3.8800e- 003 0.0000 3.8800e- 003 3.8800e- 003 2022 0.6320 0.0601 0.0889 1.3000e- 004

0.0135 0.0117 0.0252 3.6500e- 0.0000 43.1614 43.1614 0.0140 0.0000 43.5104 003
2021 0.0112 0.2188 0.3253 4.9000e- 0.0117 0.0154
004
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Maximum 0.6367 0.3913 0.2870 4.9000e- 0.0299 0.0213 0.0512 0.0162 0.0196 0.0359 0.0000 43.1615 43.1615 0.0140 0.0000 43.5104 004

0.0000 11.5054 11.5054 2.3700e003 0.0000 3.3600e- 0.0000 11.5646 003 3.3600e- 003 0.0000 3.2300e- 003 3.2300e- 003 2022 0.6367 0.0659 0.0815 1.3000e- 004 2021 0.0381 0.3913 0.2870 4.9000e- 0.0299 0.0213 0.0512 0.0162 0.0196 0.0359 0.0000 43.1615 43.1615 0.0140 0.0000 43.5104 004
NBioCO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2

2.0 Emissions Summary

2.1 Overall Construction
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
tblWater SepticTankPercent 10.33 0.00
PM10 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

25.8237 1,395.195
8 1,421.0195 1.4894 0.0116 1,461.722
0 Total 1.0966 1.0211 4.2770 0.0121 1.1150 0.0267 1.1418 0.2983 0.0262 0.3245

1.9296 3.0131 4.9427 7.0600e003 4.2800e- 003 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.3952 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 23.8941 0.0000 23.8941 1.4121 0.0000 59.1965

0.0000 1,042.590
6 1,042.5906 0.0525 0.0000 1,043.902
5 1.1150 8.7700e003 1.1238 0.2983 8.1900e- 003 Mobile 0.5633 0.7850 4.0726 0.0106 0.3065

0.0000 349.5803 349.5803 0.0177 7.3600e003 Energy 0.0260 0.2361 0.1983 1.4200e- 0.0179 0.0179 0.0179 0.0179 352.2152 0030.0000 0.0118 0.0118 3.0000e005 2.0000e- 0.0000 0.0126 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 Area 0.5073 6.0000e- 005 6.0700e- 003 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2

2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
6 5-1-2022 7-31-2022 0.0969 0.0926
Highest 0.5010 0.5017
4 11-1-2021 1-31-2022 0.2179 0.16675 2-1-2022 4-30-2022 0.5010 0.50172 5-1-2021 7-31-2021 0.0774 0.04473 8-1-2021 10-31-2021 0.1519 0.0858 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 2-1-2021 4-30-2021 0.0957 0.0408
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0.83Acres of Paving: 4.31 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 163,053; Non-Residential Outdoor: 54,351; Striped Parking Area:
85 6 Paving Paving 5/15/2022 5/25/2022 5 85 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 1/15/2022 5/15/2022 5 55 4 Building Construction Building Construction 7/1/2021 1/15/2022 5 1423 Trenching Trenching 4/15/2021 6/30/2021 5 11 2 Grading Grading 2/15/2021 4/15/2021 5 44
End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 2/1/2021 2/15/2021 5

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.63 6.51 0.86 22.77 6.41 NBio-CO2 Total
CO2
CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Bio- CO2
PM10

25.8237 1,302.646
8 1,328.4705 1.4766 8.9900e003 1,368.065 6 Total 1.0966 1.0211 4.2770 0.0121 1.1150 0.0267 1.1418 0.2983 0.0262 0.3245

1.9296 3.0131 4.9427 7.0600e003 4.2800e- 003 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.3952 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 23.8941 0.0000 23.8941 1.4121 0.0000 59.1965

0.0000 1,042.590
6 1,042.5906 0.0525 0.0000 1,043.902
5 1.1150 8.7700e003 1.1238 0.2983 8.1900e- 003 Mobile 0.5633 0.7850 4.0726 0.0106 0.3065

0.0000 257.0314 257.0314 4.9300e003 4.7100e- 003 Energy 0.0260 0.2361 0.1983 1.4200e- 0.0179 0.0179 0.0179 0.0179 258.5588 0030.0000 0.0118 0.0118 3.0000e005 2.0000e- 0.0000 0.0126 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 Area 0.5073 6.0000e- 005 6.0700e- 003 0.0000 Category tons/yr MT/yr

10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Site Preparation 2 0.00 0.00 0.00Trenching 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle
Class
Hauling
Vehicle
Class
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 2.60 97 0.37Architectural Coating Aerial Lifts 1 2.40 63 0.31Building Construction Other General Industrial Equipment 1 5.10 88 0.34 Trenching Sweepers/Scrubbers 1 2.00 64 0.46Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 2.90 78 0.48Paving Rollers 1 2.60 80 0.38Paving Paving Equipment 1 2.60 132 0.36Paving Pavers 1 2.60 130 0.42Building Construction Welders 0 0.00 46 0.45Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 1.70 97 0.37Building Construction Generator Sets 0 0.00 84 0.74Building Construction Forklifts 1 3.40 89 0.20Building Construction Cranes 1 3.40 231 0.29Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 1.10 97 0.37Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.10 247 0.40Grading Graders 1 0.30 187 0.41Grading Excavators 1 0.70 158 0.38Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 2.70 97 0.37Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 1 2.70 247 0.40Trenching Excavators 1 1.00 158 0.38Trenching Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 1.30 97 0.37 Load Factor
Grading Sweepers/Scrubbers 1 2.00 64 0.46
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 1.8999 1.8999 6.1000e004 0.0112 1.2000e- 0.0000 1.9153 003 0.0124 6.1400e- 003 1.1000e- 003 7.2400e- 003 Total 2.2900e- 003 0.0239 0.0117 2.0000e- 005

0.0000 1.8999 1.8999 6.1000e004 1.2000e- 0.0000 1.9153 003 1.2000e- 003 1.1000e- 003 1.1000e- 003 Off-Road 2.2900e- 003 0.0239 0.0117 2.0000e- 005

0.0112 0.0000 0.0112 6.1400e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003

0.0000 6.1400e003 Fugitive Dust
CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2 Total CO2
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Cleaner Engines for Construction EquipmentReplace Ground CoverWater Exposed AreaReduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads

3.2 Site Preparation - 2021

10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Architectural Coating 2 0.00 0.00 0.00Paving 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.80

10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Building Construction 4 0.00 0.00 0.00Grading 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 1.8999 1.8999 6.1000e004 5.0300e- 0.0000 1.9153 003 2.9000e- 004 5.3200e- 003 1.3800e- 003 2.9000e- 004 1.6700e- 003 Total 4.6000e- 004 7.8100e- 003 0.0128 2.0000e- 005

0.0000 1.8999 1.8999 6.1000e004 2.9000e- 0.0000 1.9153 004 2.9000e- 004 2.9000e- 004 2.9000e- 004 Off-Road 4.6000e- 004 7.8100e- 003 0.0128 2.0000e- 005

5.0300e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
003

0.0000 5.0300e003 1.3800e- 003 0.0000 1.3800e- 003 Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 5.6782 5.6782 1.8400e003 0.0187 3.1400e- 0.0000 5.7242 003 0.0219 0.0101 2.8900e- 003 Total 5.8000e- 0.0130 003 0.0593 0.0375 6.0000e- 005

0.0000 5.6782 5.6782 1.8400e003 3.1400e- 0.0000 5.7242 003 3.1400e- 003 2.8900e- 003 2.8900e- 003 Off-Road 5.8000e- 003 0.0593 0.0375 6.0000e- 005 Fugitive Dust 0.0187 0.0000 0.0187 0.0101 0.0000 0.0101 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2

3.3 Grading - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2

3.4 Trenching - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 5.6782 5.6782 1.8400e003 8.4200e- 0.0000 5.7242 003 1.3500e- 003 9.7700e- 003 2.2700e- 003 1.3500e- 003 3.6200e- 003 Total 1.4700e- 003 0.0279 0.0418 6.0000e- 005

0.0000 5.6782 5.6782 1.8400e003 1.3500e- 0.0000 5.7242 003 1.3500e- 003 1.3500e- 003 1.3500e- 003 Off-Road 1.4700e- 003 0.0279 0.0418 6.0000e- 005

8.4200e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
003

0.0000 8.4200e003 2.2700e- 003 0.0000 2.2700e- 003 Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10

0.0000 4.3032 4.3032 1.3900e003 1.1100e- 0.0000 4.3380 003 1.1100e- 003 1.1100e- 003 1.1100e- 003 Total 1.0300e- 003 0.0189 0.0370 5.0000e- 005

0.0000 4.3032 4.3032 1.3900e003 1.1100e- 0.0000 4.3380 003 1.1100e- 003 1.1100e- 003 1.1100e- 003 Off-Road 1.0300e- 003 0.0189 0.0370 5.0000e- 005 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 4.3032 4.3032 1.3900e003 1.8900e- 0.0000 4.3380 003 1.8900e- 003 1.7400e- 003 1.7400e- 003 Total 3.1800e- 003 0.0299 0.0347 5.0000e- 005

0.0000 4.3032 4.3032 1.3900e003 1.8900e- 0.0000 4.3380 003 1.8900e- 003 1.7400e- 003 1.7400e- 003 Off-Road 3.1800e- 003 0.0299 0.0347 5.0000e- 005 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 0.0268 0.2782 0.2031 3.6000e- 0.0151 0.0151 0.0139 0.0139 0.0000 31.2801 31.2801 0.0101 0.0000 31.5330 004
Off-Road 0.0268 0.2782 0.2031 3.6000e- 0.0151 0.0151 0.0139 0.0139 0.0000 31.2801 31.2801 0.0101 0.0000 31.5330 004
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2

3.5 Building Construction - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

8.9400e- 0.0000 31.2800 31.2800 0.0101 0.0000 31.5330
003

8.9400e003 8.9400e- 003 8.9400e- 003 Total 8.2300e- 003 0.1642 0.2338 3.6000e- 004

8.9400e- 0.0000 31.2800 31.2800 0.0101 0.0000 31.5330
003

8.9400e003 8.9400e- 003 8.9400e- 003 Off-Road 8.2300e- 003 0.1642 0.2338 3.6000e- 004 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 2.3702 2.3702 7.7000e004 9.5000e- 0.0000 2.3894 004 9.5000e- 004 8.7000e- 004 8.7000e- 004 Total 1.7800e- 003 0.0183 0.0150 3.0000e- 005

0.0000 2.3702 2.3702 7.7000e004 9.5000e- 0.0000 2.3894 004 9.5000e- 004 8.7000e- 004 8.7000e- 004 Off-Road 1.7800e- 003 0.0183 0.0150 3.0000e- 005 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 2.3702 2.3702 7.7000e004 6.8000e- 0.0000 2.3894 004 6.8000e- 004 6.8000e- 004 6.8000e- 004 Total 6.2000e- 004 0.0124 0.0177 3.0000e- 005

0.0000 2.3702 2.3702 7.7000e004 6.8000e- 0.0000 2.3894 004 6.8000e- 004 6.8000e- 004 6.8000e- 004 Off-Road 6.2000e- 004 0.0124 0.0177 3.0000e- 005 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Archit. Coating 0.6291 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 7.1258 7.1258 9.5000e004 1.8100e- 0.0000 7.1495 003 1.8100e- 003 1.8000e- 003 1.8000e- 003 Total 0.6338 0.0361 0.0512 8.0000e- 005

0.0000 7.1258 7.1258 9.5000e004 1.8100e- 0.0000 7.1495 003 1.8100e- 003 1.8000e- 003 1.8000e- 003 Off-Road 4.6600e- 003 0.0361 0.0512 8.0000e- 005 Archit. Coating 0.6291 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10

0.0000 2.0094 2.0094 6.5000e004 6.0000e- 0.0000 2.0257 004 6.0000e- 004 5.5000e- 004 5.5000e- 004 Total 1.1400e- 003 0.0116 0.0153 2.0000e- 005 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 2.0094 2.0094 6.5000e004 6.0000e- 0.0000 2.0257 004 6.0000e- 004 5.5000e- 004 5.5000e- 004 Off-Road 1.1400e- 003 0.0116 0.0153 2.0000e- 005 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2

3.7 Paving - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 7.1258 7.1258 9.5000e004 2.8000e- 0.0000 7.1495 003 2.8000e- 003 2.8000e- 003 2.8000e- 003 Total 0.6309 0.0399 0.0539 8.0000e- 005

0.0000 7.1258 7.1258 9.5000e004 2.8000e- 0.0000 7.1495 003 2.8000e- 003 2.8000e- 003 2.8000e- 003 Off-Road 1.7500e- 003 0.0399 0.0539 8.0000e- 005 PM10 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 2.0094 2.0094 6.5000e004 4.1000e- 0.0000 2.0257 004 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 Total 4.6000e- 004 7.7700e- 003 0.0173 2.0000e- 005 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 2.0094 2.0094 6.5000e004 4.1000e- 0.0000 2.0257 004 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 Off-Road 4.6000e- 004 7.7700e- 003 0.0173 2.0000e- 005 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unenclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual VMT
Hotel 1,642.60 1,646.90 1195.40 3,000,615 3,000,615

4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT

0.0000 1,042.590
6 1,042.5906 0.0525 0.0000 1,043.902
5 1.1150 8.7700e003 1.1238 0.2983 8.1900e- 003 Unmitigated 0.5633 0.7850 4.0726 0.0106 0.3065

0.0000 1,042.590
6 1,042.5906 0.0525 0.0000 1,043.902
5 1.1150 8.7700e003 1.1238 0.2983 8.1900e- 003 Mitigated 0.5633 0.7850 4.0726 0.0106 0.3065 NBioCO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Category tons/yr MT/yr
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2 Fugitive Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Percent of Electricity Use Generated with Renewable Energy ROG NOx CO SO2

0.022089 0.001622 0.001261 0.005132 0.000923 0.000759

0.000923 0.000759
Unenclosed Parking with Elevator 0.590598 0.052780 0.178080 0.107080 0.021013 0.005252 0.013411 Parking Lot 0.590598 0.052780 0.178080 0.107080 0.021013 0.005252 0.013411 0.022089 0.001622 0.001261 0.005132

0.022089 0.001622 0.001261 0.005132 0.000923 0.000759

0.000923 0.000759
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.590598 0.052780 0.178080 0.107080 0.021013 0.005252 0.013411 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.590598 0.052780 0.178080 0.107080 0.021013 0.005252 0.013411 0.022089 0.001622 0.001261 0.005132

0.022089 0.001622 0.001261 0.005132 0.000923 0.000759

SBUS MH
Hotel 0.590598 0.052780 0.178080 0.107080 0.021013 0.005252 0.013411 Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY

0.00 0.00 0 0 0

4.4 Fleet Mix

0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00

0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Other Asphalt Surfaces 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00

0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Unenclosed Parking with
Elevator

9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00

61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00
H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
Hotel 9.50 7.30 7.30 19.40

4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or CW
Total 1,642.60 1,646.90 1,195.40 3,000,615 3,000,615

4.7100e003 0.0179 0.0179 0.0000 257.0314 257.0314 4.9300e- 258.5588 003 0.1983 1.4200e- 003 0.0179 0.0179 CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Hotel 4.81659e+
006

0.0260 0.2361
PM2.5
Total
SO2 Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO
257.0314 4.9300e003 4.7100e- 003 258.5588
Mitigated

0.0179 0.0179 0.0179 0.0000 257.0314

0.0000
Total 0.0260 0.2361 0.1983 1.4200e003 0.0179

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unenclosed
Parking with
Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
258.5588
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0179 0.0000 257.0314 257.0314 4.9300e003 4.7100e- 003 1.4200e- 003 Hotel 4.81659e+ 0.0179 0.0179 0.0179 006 0.0260 0.2361 0.1983 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
257.0314 257.0314 4.9300e003 4.7100e- 003 258.5588

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas

0.0179 0.0179 0.0179 0.0179 0.0000

4.9300e003 4.7100e- 003 258.5588
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0260 0.2361 0.1983 1.4200e003

0.0179 0.0179 0.0000 257.0314 257.0314

93.6565
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0260 0.2361 0.1983 1.4200e003 0.0179 0.0179

0.0000 0.0000 92.5490 92.5490 0.0128 2.6400e003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Electricity
Unmitigated
Electricity 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mitigated
Land Use kWh/yr t
on
MT/yr
Mitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

13.2319
Total 92.5490 0.0128 2.6400e003 93.6565
Unenclosed
Parking with
Elevator
137269 13.0754 1.8100e003 3.7000e- 004

0.0000
Parking Lot 6020 0.5734 8.0000e005 2.0000e- 005 0.5803 Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

79.8443
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Land Use kWh/yr t
on
MT/yr
Hotel 828309 78.9001 0.0109 2.2500e003
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
257.0314 257.0314 4.9300e003 4.7100e- 003 258.5588

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity

0.0179 0.0179 0.0179 0.0179 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0260 0.2361 0.1983 1.4200e003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unenclosed
Parking with
Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000
Other Asphalt 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
PM10 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2

6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 0.0118 0.0118 3.0000e005 2.0000e- 0.0000 0.0126 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 Unmitigated 0.5073 6.0000e- 005 6.0700e- 003 0.0000

0.0000 0.0118 0.0118 3.0000e005 2.0000e- 0.0000 0.0126 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 Mitigated 0.5073 6.0000e- 005 6.0700e- 003 0.0000 NBioCO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2

6.0 Area Detail

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10

0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unenclosed
Parking with
Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hotel 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

7.0 Water Detail

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

0.0000 0.0118 0.0118 3.0000e005 2.0000e- 0.0000 0.0126 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 Total 0.5073 6.0000e- 005 6.0700e- 003 0.0000

0.0000 0.0118 0.0118 3.0000e005 2.0000e- 0.0000 0.0126 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 Landscaping 5.6000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 6.0700e- 003 0.0000 Consumer 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products

0.4439
Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating

0.0629
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 0.0118 0.0118 3.0000e005 2.0000e- 0.0000 0.0126 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 Total 0.5073 6.0000e- 005 6.0700e- 003 0.0000

0.4439
Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating

0.0629
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr

6.3952
Land Use Mgal t
on
MT/yr
Hotel 5.45386 /

0.605984

4.9427 7.0600e003 4.2800e- 003
Mitigated
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

0.0000
Total 4.9427 7.0600e003 4.2800e- 003 6.3952
Unenclosed
Parking with
Elevator
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

6.3952
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Land Use Mgal t
on
MT/yr
Hotel 5.45386 /

0.605984

4.9427 7.0600e003 4.2800e- 003

7.2 Water by Land Use
Unmitigated
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Unmitigated 4.9427 7.0600e003 4.2800e- 003 6.3952
Category t
on
MT/yr
Mitigated 4.9427 7.0600e003 4.2800e- 003 6.3952
Land Use tons t
on
MT/yr

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Unmitigated 23.8941 1.4121 0.0000 59.1965
ton
MT/yr
Mitigated 23.8941 1.4121 0.0000 59.1965

8.0 Waste Detail

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Category/Year
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

0.0000
Total 4.9427 7.0600e003 4.2800e- 003 6.3952
Unenclosed
Parking with
Elevator
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power

0.0000
Total 23.8941 1.4121 0.0000 59.1965
Unenclosed
Parking with
Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

59.1965
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Land Use tons t
on
MT/yr
Hotel 117.71 23.8941 1.4121 0.0000
Mitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

0.0000
Total 23.8941 1.4121 0.0000 59.1965
Unenclosed
Parking with
Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

59.1965
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hotel 117.71 23.8941 1.4121 0.0000
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number

11.0 Vegetation
Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2

Page 1 of 1 ends

Alviso Hotel, San Jose - Santa Clara County, Annual
Alviso Hotel, San Jose - 2030
Santa Clara County, Annual

1.0 Project Characteristics

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 43.00 Space 0.00 17,200.00 0
Unenclosed Parking with Elevator 192.00 Space 0.00 70,757.00 0 Hotel 215.00 Room 1.92 108,702.00 0
Other Asphalt Surfaces 22.97 1000sqft 0.00 22,973.00 0
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 187.79 1000sqft 4.31 187,792.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 58 Climate Zone 4 Operational Year 2030
Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric CompanyCO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 210 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.029 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.006

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics - PG&E 2017 Intensity Factor = 210Land Use - Provided land usesConstruction Phase - Provided construction schedule 9/8/2020Off-road Equipment - Provided construction equip & hours 9/8/2020Off-road Equipment - Provided construction equip & hours 9/8/2020 Off-road Equipment - Provided construction equip & hours 9/8/2020 Off-road Equipment - Provided construction equip & hours 9/8/2020Off-road Equipment - Provided construction equip & hours 9/8/2020Off-road Equipment - Provided construction equip & hours 9/8/2020Grading - grading = 900cy importDemolition - Trips and VMT - o Trips Post-model computation with EMFAC2017, building const = est 100 cement total round trips, paving = 200cy asphalt Vehicle Trips - provided traffic, hotel trip gen rate with reduction = 7.64, 7.66, 5.56Vehicle Emission Factors - EMFAC2017 Santa Clara County 2030 Emissions FactorsWoodstoves - Energy Use - Water And Wastewater - WWTP 100% aerobicConstruction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - BMPs, Tier 3 mitigationEnergy Mitigation - SJCE is the electrciity provider in San Jose. Will provide 100% carbon free electricity from 2021 on Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 6.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 FinaltblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 11.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 44.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 230.00 142.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 8.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 85.00tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 2/12/2021 2/15/2021tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 3/12/2021 4/15/2021tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 1/28/2022 1/15/2022tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 2/25/2022 5/25/2022tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 3/25/2022 5/15/2022tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 2/13/2021 2/15/2021tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 3/13/2021 7/1/2021tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 1/29/2022 5/15/2022tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 2/26/2022 1/15/2022 tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 0.02tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 0.02
tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 0.02
tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 0.02tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 0.02tblFleetMix LDA 0.62 0.60tblFleetMix LDA 0.62 0.60tblFleetMix LDA 0.62 0.60tblFleetMix LDA 0.62 0.60tblFleetMix LDA 0.62 0.60tblFleetMix LDT1 0.03 0.05tblFleetMix LDT1 0.03 0.05tblFleetMix LDT1 0.03 0.05tblFleetMix LDT1 0.03 0.05tblFleetMix LDT1 0.03 0.05tblFleetMix LDT2 0.18 0.17tblFleetMix LDT2 0.18 0.17tblFleetMix LDT2 0.18 0.17tblFleetMix LDT2 0.18 0.17tblFleetMix LDT2 0.18 0.17tblFleetMix LHD1 0.01 0.02tblFleetMix LHD1 0.01 0.02tblFleetMix LHD1 0.01 0.02tblFleetMix LHD1 0.01 0.02tblFleetMix LHD1 0.01 0.02tblFleetMix LHD2 5.0600e-003 5.5563e-003tblFleetMix LHD2 5.0600e-003 5.5563e-003tblFleetMix LHD2 5.0600e-003 5.5563e-003tblFleetMix LHD2 5.0600e-003 5.5563e-003tblFleetMix LHD2 5.0600e-003 5.5563e-003tblFleetMix MCY 5.1220e-003 4.7803e-003tblFleetMix MCY 5.1220e-003 4.7803e-003 tblFleetMix MCY 5.1220e-003 4.7803e-003
tblFleetMix MCY 5.1220e-003 4.7803e-003tblFleetMix MCY 5.1220e-003 4.7803e-003tblFleetMix MDV 0.10 0.11tblFleetMix MDV 0.10 0.11tblFleetMix MDV 0.10 0.11tblFleetMix MDV 0.10 0.11tblFleetMix MDV 0.10 0.11tblFleetMix MH 6.5100e-004 7.2763e-004tblFleetMix MH 6.5100e-004 7.2763e-004tblFleetMix MH 6.5100e-004 7.2763e-004tblFleetMix MH 6.5100e-004 7.2763e-004tblFleetMix MH 6.5100e-004 7.2763e-004tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 0.01tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 0.01tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 0.01tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 0.01tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 0.01tblFleetMix OBUS 2.2210e-003 1.4429e-003tblFleetMix OBUS 2.2210e-003 1.4429e-003tblFleetMix OBUS 2.2210e-003 1.4429e-003tblFleetMix OBUS 2.2210e-003 1.4429e-003tblFleetMix OBUS 2.2210e-003 1.4429e-003tblFleetMix SBUS 6.4600e-004 9.0041e-004tblFleetMix SBUS 6.4600e-004 9.0041e-004tblFleetMix SBUS 6.4600e-004 9.0041e-004tblFleetMix SBUS 6.4600e-004 9.0041e-004tblFleetMix SBUS 6.4600e-004 9.0041e-004tblFleetMix UBUS 1.4700e-003 1.1782e-003tblFleetMix UBUS 1.4700e-003 1.1782e-003 tblFleetMix UBUS 1.4700e-003 1.1782e-003
tblFleetMix UBUS 1.4700e-003 1.1782e-003tblFleetMix UBUS 1.4700e-003 1.1782e-003 tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 900.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 76,800.00 70,757.00tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 312,180.00 108,702.00tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.39 0.00tblLandUse LotAcreage 1.73 0.00tblLandUse LotAcreage 7.17 1.92tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.53 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.37 0.37tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.38tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.46 0.46tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.37 0.37tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Sweepers/ScrubberstblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType ExcavatorstblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Sweepers/ScrubberstblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Other General Industrial EquipmenttblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Aerial LiftstblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Tractors/Loaders/BackhoestblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 1.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 1.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 1.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 1.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 4.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 2.90tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 3.40tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 0.70tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 3.40tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 0.30tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 2.60tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 2.60tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 2.60tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 1.10tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 2.70tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 1.70tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 1.10tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 2.70tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 0.00 tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 641.35 210 tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 113.00 0.00tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 67.00 0.00tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 8.00 0.00tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 5.00 0.00tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 13.00 0.00tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 171.00 0.00tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 13.00 0.00tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 34.00 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD 0.27 0.02tblVehicleEF HHD 0.06 0.05tblVehicleEF HHD 0.06 0.00tblVehicleEF HHD 1.43 6.28tblVehicleEF HHD 0.94 0.41 tblVehicleEF HHD 4.01 6.6850e-003
tblVehicleEF HHD 4,037.05 930.05tblVehicleEF HHD 1,498.85 1,226.35tblVehicleEF HHD 12.27 0.05tblVehicleEF HHD 12.16 5.20tblVehicleEF HHD 1.59 2.52tblVehicleEF HHD 19.20 2.31tblVehicleEF HHD 3.6830e-003 2.1460e-003tblVehicleEF HHD 0.06 0.06tblVehicleEF HHD 0.04 0.04tblVehicleEF HHD 5.6600e-003 0.02tblVehicleEF HHD 1.3500e-004 1.0000e-006tblVehicleEF HHD 3.5230e-003 2.0530e-003tblVehicleEF HHD 0.03 0.03tblVehicleEF HHD 8.8550e-003 8.9050e-003tblVehicleEF HHD 5.4140e-003 0.02tblVehicleEF HHD 1.2400e-004 1.0000e-006tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0100e-004 1.0000e-006tblVehicleEF HHD 4.6010e-003 5.8000e-005tblVehicleEF HHD 0.37 0.42tblVehicleEF HHD 6.4000e-005 1.0000e-006tblVehicleEF HHD 0.08 0.02tblVehicleEF HHD 4.1900e-004 2.8400e-004tblVehicleEF HHD 0.07 2.0000e-006tblVehicleEF HHD 0.04 8.6530e-003tblVehicleEF HHD 0.01 0.01tblVehicleEF HHD 1.8800e-004 1.0000e-006tblVehicleEF HHD 1.0100e-004 1.0000e-006tblVehicleEF HHD 4.6010e-003 5.8000e-005tblVehicleEF HHD 0.43 0.49 tblVehicleEF HHD 6.4000e-005 1.0000e-006
tblVehicleEF HHD 0.15 0.07tblVehicleEF HHD 4.1900e-004 2.8400e-004tblVehicleEF HHD 0.08 2.0000e-006tblVehicleEF LDA 1.8990e-003 9.5900e-004tblVehicleEF LDA 2.1050e-003 0.03tblVehicleEF LDA 0.33 0.41tblVehicleEF LDA 0.63 1.72tblVehicleEF LDA 181.37 213.89tblVehicleEF LDA 42.51 45.13tblVehicleEF LDA 0.03 0.02tblVehicleEF LDA 0.03 0.13tblVehicleEF LDA 1.1470e-003 9.2900e-004tblVehicleEF LDA 1.8260e-003 1.2750e-003tblVehicleEF LDA 1.0560e-003 8.5500e-004tblVehicleEF LDA 1.6790e-003 1.1720e-003tblVehicleEF LDA 0.02 0.02tblVehicleEF LDA 0.06 0.06tblVehicleEF LDA 0.02 0.02tblVehicleEF LDA 4.7560e-003 3.2470e-003tblVehicleEF LDA 0.03 0.17tblVehicleEF LDA 0.03 0.12tblVehicleEF LDA 1.8150e-003 9.0000e-005tblVehicleEF LDA 4.3500e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF LDA 0.02 0.02tblVehicleEF LDA 0.06 0.06tblVehicleEF LDA 0.02 0.02tblVehicleEF LDA 6.9190e-003 4.7160e-003tblVehicleEF LDA 0.03 0.17tblVehicleEF LDA 0.03 0.13 tblVehicleEF LDT1 3.6800e-003 1.6710e-003
tblVehicleEF LDT1 4.5270e-003 0.04tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.55 0.54tblVehicleEF LDT1 1.12 1.85tblVehicleEF LDT1 233.07 258.41tblVehicleEF LDT1 54.62 55.17tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.05 0.03tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.06 0.15tblVehicleEF LDT1 1.4520e-003 1.0700e-003tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.1870e-003 1.4610e-003tblVehicleEF LDT1 1.3350e-003 9.8400e-004tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.0110e-003 1.3440e-003tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.05 0.05tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.12 0.09tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.04 0.04tblVehicleEF LDT1 9.1170e-003 6.5000e-003tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.09 0.36tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.06 0.15tblVehicleEF LDT1 2.3350e-003 2.5670e-003tblVehicleEF LDT1 5.6500e-004 0.00tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.05 0.05tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.12 0.09tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.04 0.04tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.01 9.4830e-003tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.09 0.36tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.07 0.17tblVehicleEF LDT2 2.9960e-003 1.7260e-003tblVehicleEF LDT2 3.1970e-003 0.04tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.49 0.56tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.89 2.29 tblVehicleEF LDT2 264.16 267.33
tblVehicleEF LDT2 61.38 57.57tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.04 0.03tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.05 0.17tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.3060e-003 1.0250e-003tblVehicleEF LDT2 2.0190e-003 1.3400e-003tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.2010e-003 9.4400e-004tblVehicleEF LDT2 1.8570e-003 1.2320e-003tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.03 0.05tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.07 0.09tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.03 0.05tblVehicleEF LDT2 7.4390e-003 6.5530e-003tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.06 0.34tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.04 0.18tblVehicleEF LDT2 2.6450e-003 9.4800e-003tblVehicleEF LDT2 6.2800e-004 8.5000e-005tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.03 0.05tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.07 0.09tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.03 0.05tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.01 9.5240e-003tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.06 0.34tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.05 0.20tblVehicleEF LHD1 3.9820e-003 4.1480e-003tblVehicleEF LHD1 8.6490e-003 5.1950e-003tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 9.0230e-003tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.14 0.18tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.61 0.47tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.67 0.89tblVehicleEF LHD1 8.93 8.25tblVehicleEF LHD1 641.43 698.55 tblVehicleEF LHD1 26.94 10.09
tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.06 0.05tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.53 0.30tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.67 0.23tblVehicleEF LHD1 7.8900e-004 9.1500e-004tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 9.9010e-003tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 7.0190e-003tblVehicleEF LHD1 6.6500e-004 2.1000e-004tblVehicleEF LHD1 7.5500e-004 8.7500e-004tblVehicleEF LHD1 2.6030e-003 2.4750e-003tblVehicleEF LHD1 9.7020e-003 6.6710e-003tblVehicleEF LHD1 6.1100e-004 1.9300e-004tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.8620e-003 1.4030e-003tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.08 0.05tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.01 0.02tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.0210e-003 7.7200e-004tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.10 0.07tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.26 0.43tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.15 0.04tblVehicleEF LHD1 8.9000e-005 8.0000e-005tblVehicleEF LHD1 6.2670e-003 6.8120e-003tblVehicleEF LHD1 3.0000e-004 1.0000e-004tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.8620e-003 1.4030e-003tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.08 0.05tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.02 0.02tblVehicleEF LHD1 1.0210e-003 7.7200e-004tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.11 0.09tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.26 0.43tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.16 0.05tblVehicleEF LHD2 2.5430e-003 2.5050e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 5.3180e-003 5.3390e-003
tblVehicleEF LHD2 3.2330e-003 4.8110e-003tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.12 0.13tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.45 0.49tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.88 0.48tblVehicleEF LHD2 13.62 13.00tblVehicleEF LHD2 675.95 679.81tblVehicleEF LHD2 21.83 6.44tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.07 0.07tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.22 0.38tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.26 0.12tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.0460e-003 1.5020e-003tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.01 0.01tblVehicleEF LHD2 9.3120e-003 0.01tblVehicleEF LHD2 3.7400e-004 1.0600e-004tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.0000e-003 1.4370e-003tblVehicleEF LHD2 2.7080e-003 2.7110e-003tblVehicleEF LHD2 8.8860e-003 0.01tblVehicleEF LHD2 3.4400e-004 9.8000e-005tblVehicleEF LHD2 5.1500e-004 6.4200e-004tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.02tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.01 0.01tblVehicleEF LHD2 3.0800e-004 3.7400e-004tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.09 0.10tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.04 0.14tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.04 0.02tblVehicleEF LHD2 1.3300e-004 1.2400e-004tblVehicleEF LHD2 6.5670e-003 6.5570e-003tblVehicleEF LHD2 2.3300e-004 6.4000e-005tblVehicleEF LHD2 5.1500e-004 6.4200e-004 tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.02 0.02
tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.01 0.02tblVehicleEF LHD2 3.0800e-004 3.7400e-004tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.11 0.11tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.04 0.14tblVehicleEF LHD2 0.05 0.02tblVehicleEF MCY 0.46 0.32tblVehicleEF MCY 0.16 0.25tblVehicleEF MCY 17.52 17.61tblVehicleEF MCY 10.34 9.20tblVehicleEF MCY 171.38 209.76tblVehicleEF MCY 42.85 59.23tblVehicleEF MCY 1.14 1.14tblVehicleEF MCY 0.32 0.27tblVehicleEF MCY 2.1570e-003 2.1380e-003tblVehicleEF MCY 3.3210e-003 2.8620e-003tblVehicleEF MCY 2.0120e-003 1.9940e-003tblVehicleEF MCY 3.1070e-003 2.6760e-003tblVehicleEF MCY 0.88 1.79tblVehicleEF MCY 0.61 0.63tblVehicleEF MCY 0.46 0.95tblVehicleEF MCY 2.12 2.13tblVehicleEF MCY 0.46 1.49tblVehicleEF MCY 2.11 1.88tblVehicleEF MCY 2.0640e-003 2.0760e-003tblVehicleEF MCY 6.5900e-004 5.8600e-004tblVehicleEF MCY 0.88 1.79tblVehicleEF MCY 0.61 0.63tblVehicleEF MCY 0.46 0.95tblVehicleEF MCY 2.66 2.67 tblVehicleEF MCY 0.46 1.49
tblVehicleEF MCY 2.30 2.04tblVehicleEF MDV 5.1180e-003 1.7720e-003tblVehicleEF MDV 7.2260e-003 0.04tblVehicleEF MDV 0.68 0.55tblVehicleEF MDV 1.51 2.32tblVehicleEF MDV 358.67 322.27tblVehicleEF MDV 82.28 67.92tblVehicleEF MDV 0.07 0.04tblVehicleEF MDV 0.11 0.18tblVehicleEF MDV 1.3880e-003 1.0340e-003tblVehicleEF MDV 2.0820e-003 1.3440e-003tblVehicleEF MDV 1.2780e-003 9.5400e-004tblVehicleEF MDV 1.9150e-003 1.2360e-003tblVehicleEF MDV 0.05 0.06tblVehicleEF MDV 0.13 0.10tblVehicleEF MDV 0.05 0.06tblVehicleEF MDV 0.01 6.8870e-003tblVehicleEF MDV 0.09 0.34tblVehicleEF MDV 0.10 0.20tblVehicleEF MDV 3.5870e-003 2.9760e-003tblVehicleEF MDV 8.4800e-004 6.2800e-004tblVehicleEF MDV 0.05 0.06tblVehicleEF MDV 0.13 0.10tblVehicleEF MDV 0.05 0.06tblVehicleEF MDV 0.02 9.9830e-003tblVehicleEF MDV 0.09 0.34tblVehicleEF MDV 0.11 0.22tblVehicleEF MH 8.2310e-003 5.0270e-003tblVehicleEF MH 0.02 0.02 tblVehicleEF MH 0.45 0.31
tblVehicleEF MH 3.72 1.64tblVehicleEF MH 1,184.19 1,350.27tblVehicleEF MH 56.79 15.54tblVehicleEF MH 0.84 1.06tblVehicleEF MH 0.62 0.24tblVehicleEF MH 0.01 0.01tblVehicleEF MH 0.01 0.02tblVehicleEF MH 8.8300e-004 2.1200e-004tblVehicleEF MH 3.2210e-003 3.2970e-003tblVehicleEF MH 0.01 0.02tblVehicleEF MH 8.1200e-004 1.9500e-004tblVehicleEF MH 0.46 0.35tblVehicleEF MH 0.04 0.03tblVehicleEF MH 0.18 0.14tblVehicleEF MH 0.04 0.04tblVehicleEF MH 0.01 0.54tblVehicleEF MH 0.22 0.07tblVehicleEF MH 0.01 0.01tblVehicleEF MH 6.3200e-004 1.5400e-004tblVehicleEF MH 0.46 0.35tblVehicleEF MH 0.04 0.03tblVehicleEF MH 0.18 0.14tblVehicleEF MH 0.05 0.05tblVehicleEF MH 0.01 0.54tblVehicleEF MH 0.24 0.08tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 3.8320e-003tblVehicleEF MHD 2.7470e-003 1.0340e-003tblVehicleEF MHD 0.03 8.3830e-003tblVehicleEF MHD 0.37 0.41 tblVehicleEF MHD 0.25 0.15
tblVehicleEF MHD 3.74 0.87tblVehicleEF MHD 131.96 65.10tblVehicleEF MHD 1,167.79 993.45tblVehicleEF MHD 59.45 8.55tblVehicleEF MHD 0.34 0.34tblVehicleEF MHD 1.04 1.43tblVehicleEF MHD 9.99 1.69tblVehicleEF MHD 5.2000e-005 1.6200e-004tblVehicleEF MHD 3.0080e-003 7.0060e-003tblVehicleEF MHD 8.2100e-004 1.1200e-004tblVehicleEF MHD 5.0000e-005 1.5500e-004tblVehicleEF MHD 2.8710e-003 6.6960e-003tblVehicleEF MHD 7.5400e-004 1.0300e-004tblVehicleEF MHD 6.4300e-004 2.8900e-004tblVehicleEF MHD 0.03 0.01tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.02tblVehicleEF MHD 3.8200e-004 1.6800e-004tblVehicleEF MHD 0.04 0.01tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.07tblVehicleEF MHD 0.23 0.04tblVehicleEF MHD 1.2710e-003 6.1800e-004tblVehicleEF MHD 0.01 9.4800e-003tblVehicleEF MHD 6.6000e-004 8.5000e-005tblVehicleEF MHD 6.4300e-004 2.8900e-004tblVehicleEF MHD 0.03 0.01tblVehicleEF MHD 0.03 0.03tblVehicleEF MHD 3.8200e-004 1.6800e-004tblVehicleEF MHD 0.05 0.01tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.07 tblVehicleEF MHD 0.25 0.05
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.01 7.0980e-003tblVehicleEF OBUS 4.0840e-003 2.1970e-003tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.02 0.02tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.24 0.64tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.30 0.26tblVehicleEF OBUS 4.08 1.58tblVehicleEF OBUS 110.55 97.36tblVehicleEF OBUS 1,272.30 1,210.85tblVehicleEF OBUS 64.94 13.46tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.24 0.43tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.85 1.45tblVehicleEF OBUS 2.74 1.13tblVehicleEF OBUS 2.2000e-005 1.4200e-004tblVehicleEF OBUS 2.8340e-003 7.8820e-003tblVehicleEF OBUS 9.3800e-004 1.5600e-004tblVehicleEF OBUS 2.1000e-005 1.3600e-004tblVehicleEF OBUS 2.6900e-003 7.5260e-003tblVehicleEF OBUS 8.6200e-004 1.4400e-004tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.1660e-003 1.0620e-003tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.01 0.02tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.03 0.05tblVehicleEF OBUS 5.3200e-004 4.8700e-004tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.04 0.02tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.03 0.18tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.26 0.08tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.0660e-003 9.2400e-004tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.01 0.01tblVehicleEF OBUS 7.2100e-004 1.3300e-004tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.1660e-003 1.0620e-003 tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.01 0.02
tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.05 0.06tblVehicleEF OBUS 5.3200e-004 4.8700e-004tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.05 0.02tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.03 0.18tblVehicleEF OBUS 0.28 0.08tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.81 0.07tblVehicleEF SBUS 7.6490e-003 4.4040e-003tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.06 6.3380e-003tblVehicleEF SBUS 8.87 2.93tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.48 0.37tblVehicleEF SBUS 7.57 0.86tblVehicleEF SBUS 1,023.58 337.48tblVehicleEF SBUS 1,008.60 970.50tblVehicleEF SBUS 61.81 5.06tblVehicleEF SBUS 4.35 2.71tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.72 3.09tblVehicleEF SBUS 10.76 1.18tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.1870e-003 2.0480e-003tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 0.01tblVehicleEF SBUS 8.4940e-003 0.02tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.1020e-003 6.8000e-005tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.0920e-003 1.9600e-003tblVehicleEF SBUS 2.5880e-003 2.6690e-003tblVehicleEF SBUS 8.1060e-003 0.02tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.0130e-003 6.2000e-005tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.7080e-003 8.7000e-004tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.03 8.3040e-003tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.05 0.32tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.7580e-003 4.1400e-004 tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.07 0.06
tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.05tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.40 0.04tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.01 3.2190e-003tblVehicleEF SBUS 9.7440e-003 9.2880e-003tblVehicleEF SBUS 7.4900e-004 5.0000e-005tblVehicleEF SBUS 3.7080e-003 8.7000e-004tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.03 8.3040e-003tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.53 0.46tblVehicleEF SBUS 1.7580e-003 4.1400e-004tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.08 0.07tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.02 0.05tblVehicleEF SBUS 0.43 0.04tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.23 1.86tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.05 2.1860e-003tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.04 14.11tblVehicleEF UBUS 7.59 0.14tblVehicleEF UBUS 1,937.16 1,668.67tblVehicleEF UBUS 126.43 1.40tblVehicleEF UBUS 4.75 0.71tblVehicleEF UBUS 13.02 0.02tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.54 0.07tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.01 0.03tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.10 5.1160e-003tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.3960e-003 1.5000e-005tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.23 0.03tblVehicleEF UBUS 3.0000e-003 8.3320e-003tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.10 4.8930e-003tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.2840e-003 1.4000e-005tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.5990e-003 6.1000e-005 tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.04 8.1400e-004
tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.5170e-003 3.6000e-005tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.23 0.03tblVehicleEF UBUS 9.4350e-003 4.9280e-003tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.65 9.2610e-003tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.02 0.01tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.4020e-003 1.4000e-005tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.5990e-003 6.1000e-005tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.04 8.1400e-004tblVehicleEF UBUS 1.5170e-003 3.6000e-005tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.48 1.90tblVehicleEF UBUS 9.4350e-003 4.9280e-003tblVehicleEF UBUS 0.71 0.01 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 7.66tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 5.56tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 7.64 tblWater AerobicPercent 87.46 100.00tblWater AerobicPercent 87.46 100.00tblWater AerobicPercent 87.46 100.00tblWater AerobicPercent 87.46 100.00tblWater AerobicPercent 87.46 100.00tblWater AnaerobicandFacultativeLagoonsPerce nt

2.21 0.00
tblWater AnaerobicandFacultativeLagoonsPerce
nt

2.21 0.00
tblWater SepticTankPercent 10.33 0.00tblWater SepticTankPercent 10.33 0.00tblWater SepticTankPercent 10.33 0.00tblWater SepticTankPercent 10.33 0.00 tblWater SepticTankPercent 10.33 0.00

2.0 Emissions Summary
SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2

2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
Area 0.5073 5.0000e005 6.0400e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0118 0.0118 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0126 Energy 0.0260 0.2361 0.1983 1.4200e003 0.0179 0.0179 0.0179 0.0179 0.0000 349.5803 349.5803 0.0177 7.3600e- 003 352.2152 Mobile 0.3959 0.6230 3.1006 9.3200e003 1.1153 6.8900e- 003 1.1222 0.2984 6.4500e- 003 0.3049 0.0000 906.2339 906.2339 0.0374 0.0000 907.1682 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 23.8941 0.0000 23.8941 1.4121 0.0000 59.1965 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.9296 3.0131 4.9427 7.0600e003 4.2800e- 003 6.3952 Total 0.9292 0.8592 3.3049 0.0107 1.4743 0.0116 1,324.987 8 1.1153 0.0249 1.1402 0.2984 0.0244 0.3228
SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

25.8237 1,258.839
1 1,284.6628
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
Area 0.5073 5.0000e005 6.0400e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0118 0.0118 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0126 Energy 0.0260 0.2361 0.1983 1.4200e003 0.0179 0.0179 0.0179 0.0179 0.0000 257.0314 257.0314 4.9300e- 003 4.7100e- 003 258.5588 Mobile 0.3959 0.6230 3.1006 9.3200e003 1.1153 6.8900e- 003 1.1222 0.2984 6.4500e- 003 0.3049 0.0000 906.2339 906.2339 0.0374 0.0000 907.1682 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 23.8941 0.0000 23.8941 1.4121 0.0000 59.1965 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.9296 3.0131 4.9427 7.0600e003 4.2800e- 003 6.3952 Total 0.9292 0.8592 3.3049 0.0107 1.1153 0.0249 1.1402 0.2984 0.0244 0.3228 25.8237 1,166.290 2 1,192.1138 1.4615 8.9900e003 1,231.331 3
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total
CO2
CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.35 7.20 0.87 22.77 7.07 CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG NOx NBioCO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Mitigated 0.3959 0.6230 3.1006 9.3200e003 1.1153 6.8900e- 003 1.1222 0.2984 6.4500e- 003 0.3049 0.0000 906.2339 906.2339 0.0374 0.0000 907.1682 Unmitigated 0.3959 0.6230 3.1006 9.3200e003 1.1153 6.8900e- 003 1.1222 0.2984 6.4500e- 003 0.3049 0.0000 906.2339 906.2339 0.0374 0.0000 907.1682

4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Hotel 1,642.60 1,646.90 1195.40 3,000,615 3,000,615
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unenclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 1,642.60 1,646.90 1,195.40 3,000,615 3,000,615

4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or CW H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Hotel 9.50 7.30 7.30 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4 Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Unenclosed Parking with
Elevator

9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Other Asphalt Surfaces 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Hotel 0.595423 0.053963 0.171400 0.106522 0.021043 0.005556 0.013639 0.023425 0.001443 0.001178 0.004780 0.000900 0.000728 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.595423 0.053963 0.171400 0.106522 0.021043 0.005556 0.013639 0.023425 0.001443 0.001178 0.004780 0.000900 0.000728 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.595423 0.053963 0.171400 0.106522 0.021043 0.005556 0.013639 0.023425 0.001443 0.001178 0.004780 0.000900 0.000728 Parking Lot 0.595423 0.053963 0.171400 0.106522 0.021043 0.005556 0.013639 0.023425 0.001443 0.001178 0.004780 0.000900 0.000728 Unenclosed Parking with Elevator 0.595423 0.053963 0.171400 0.106522 0.021043 0.005556 0.013639 0.023425 0.001443 0.001178 0.004780 0.000900 0.000728

5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Percent of Electricity Use Generated with Renewable Energy ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 92.5490 92.5490 0.0128 2.6400e003 93.6565 NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0260 0.2361 0.1983 1.4200e003 0.0179 0.0179 0.0179 0.0179 0.0000 257.0314 257.0314 4.9300e- 003 4.7100e- 003 258.5588 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0260 0.2361 0.1983 1.4200e003 4.9300e- 003 4.7100e- 003 258.5588

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas

0.0179 0.0179 0.0179 0.0179 0.0000
CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
257.0314 257.0314
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Hotel 4.81659e+
006

0.0260 0.2361 0.1983 1.4200e003 0.0179 0.0179 0.0179 0.0179 0.0000 257.0314 257.0314 4.9300e- 003 4.7100e- 003 258.5588 Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unenclosed
Parking with
Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0179

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 257.0314

0.0000
Total 0.0260 0.2361 0.1983 1.4200e003 257.0314 4.9300e- 003 4.7100e- 003 258.5588 Mitigated

0.0179 0.0179 0.0179
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Hotel 4.81659e+
006

1.4200e003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0179 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0260 0.2361 0.1983 257.0314 257.0314 4.9300e003 4.7100e- 003 258.5588

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity

0.0179 0.0179 0.0179
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr t
on
MT/yr
Hotel 828309 78.9001 0.0109 2.2500e003 79.8443
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 6020 0.5734 8.0000e005 2.0000e- 005
137269 13.0754 1.8100e003 3.7000e- 004

0.00000.5803

13.2319
Total 92.5490 0.0128 2.6400e003 93.6565
Unenclosed
Parking with
Elevator
Mitigated
CO2e

0.0000 0.0000
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O

0.0000 0.0000
Land Use kWh/yr t
on
MT/yr
Hotel 0 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000
Unenclosed
Parking with
Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10

0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2

6.0 Area Detail

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx NBioCO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Mitigated 0.5073 5.0000e005 6.0400e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0118 0.0118 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0126 Unmitigated 0.5073 5.0000e005 6.0400e- 003 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 0.0000 0.0126 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0118 0.0118

6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2 ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
Architectural
Coating

0.0629 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.4439 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 5.5000e004 5.0000e- 005 6.0400e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0118 0.0118 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0126 Total 0.5073 5.0000e005 6.0400e- 003 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 0.0000 0.0126 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 0.0118 0.0118
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated
ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
Architectural
Coating

0.0629 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.4439 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 5.5000e004 5.0000e- 005 6.0400e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0118 0.0118 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0126 Total 0.5073 5.0000e005 6.0400e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0118 0.0118 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0126

7.0 Water Detail

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category t
on
MT/yr
Mitigated 4.9427 7.0600e003 4.2800e- 003 6.3952
Unmitigated 4.9427 7.0600e003 4.2800e- 003 6.3952

7.2 Water by Land Use
Unmitigated
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal t
on
MT/yr
Hotel 5.45386 /

0.605984

4.9427 7.0600e003 4.2800e- 003 6.3952
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000
Total 4.9427 7.0600e003 4.2800e- 003 6.3952
Unenclosed
Parking with
Elevator
0 / 0
Mitigated
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal t
on
MT/yr
Hotel 5.45386 /

0.605984

4.9427 7.0600e003 4.2800e- 003 6.3952
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000
Total 4.9427 7.0600e003 4.2800e- 003 6.3952
Unenclosed
Parking with
Elevator
0 / 0

8.0 Waste Detail

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Category/Year
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
ton
MT/yr
Mitigated 23.8941 1.4121 0.0000 59.1965
Unmitigated 23.8941 1.4121 0.0000 59.1965

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons t
on
MT/yr
Hotel 117.71 23.8941 1.4121 0.0000 59.1965
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000
Total 23.8941 1.4121 0.0000 59.1965
Unenclosed
Parking with
Elevator
0 Mitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons t
on
MT/yr
Hotel 117.71 23.8941 1.4121 0.0000 59.1965
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000
Total 23.8941 1.4121 0.0000 59.1965
Unenclosed
Parking with
Elevator
0 Horse Power Load Factor

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power
Boiler Rating Fuel Type
Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number

11.0 Vegetation
Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year
Attachment 3: EMFAC2017 Calculations

Phase
CalEEMod WORKER TRIPS
CalEEMod VENDOR TRIPS
Total Worker Trips
Total Vendor Trips
CalEEMod HAULING TRIPS
Worker Trip Length
Vendor Trip Length
Hauling Trip Length
Worker Vehicle Class
Vendor Vehicle Class
Hauling Vehicle Class
Worker
VMT
Vendor
VMT
Hauling
VMT
Demolition 0 0 0 10.8 7.3 20 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 0 0 0Site Preparation 5 0 55 0 0 10.8 7.3 20 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 594 0 0Grading 13 0 572 0 112 10.8 7.3 20 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 6177.6 0 2240Trenching 8 0 520 0 0 10.8 7.3 20 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 5616 0 0 Building Construction 171 67 24282 9514 200 10.8 7.3 7.3 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 262245.6 69452.2 1460 Architectural Coating 34 0 2890 0 0 10.8 7.3 20 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 31212 0 0 Paving 13 0 104 0 48 10.8 7.3 7.3 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 1123.2 0 350.42021 2/1/21 12/31/21 334 240 2022 1/1/22 5/25/22 145 103
479 343 Total Workdays
Phase Start Date End Date Days/Week Workdays
Demolition 0 0 0 0Site Preparation 2/1/2021 2/15/2021 5 11 Grading 2/15/2021 4/15/2021 5 44Trenching 4/15/2021 6/30/2021 5 65Building Construction 7/1/2021 1/15/2022 5 142Architectural Coating 1/15/2022 5/15/2022 5 85Paving 5/15/2022 5/25/2022 58Number of Days Per Year CalEEMod Construction Inputs
Pollutants ROG NOx CO SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total NBio‐ CO2
YEAR Metric Tons
2021 0.0321 0.2689 0.3028 0.0014 0.0874 0.0211 0.1085 0.0132 0.0106 0.0238 138.01432022 0.0115 0.0995 0.1199 0.0006 0.0380 0.0084 0.0464 0.0057 0.0039 0.0096 58.4424 2021 0.0217 0.0769 0.1069 0.0002 0.0088 0.0025 0.0113 0.0013 0.0013 0.0026 21.3472 2022 0.0086 0.0313 0.0451 0.0001 0.0038 0.0010 0.0048 0.0006 0.0005 0.0010 9.1180 Summary of Construction Traffic Emissions (EMFAC2017)
Tons
Criteria Pollutants
Toxic Air Contaminants (1 Mile Trip Length)
Year 2023
Season EmissionType LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MHA CH4_IDLEX 0000 0.005162 0.003155 0.003545 0.024833819 0.007063 0 0 0.051479 0 A CH4_RUNEX 0.001958 0.004163 0.003245 0.00391 0.008545 0.00706 0.001932 0.049536467 0.004013 1.348781 0.326994 0.006356 0.0108 A CH4_STREX 0.047744 0.063181 0.066279 0.077681 0.015 0.008431 0.009487 4.90854E‐07 0.017607 0.001417 0.255241 0.004783 0.023194A CO_IDLEX 0000 0.185249 0.138442 0.388783 6.342287544 0.573374 0 0 2.176398 0A CO_RUNEX 0.56207 0.946438 0.787567 0.865358 0.768919 0.621061 0.261063 0.395696608 0.470154 10.11652 18.86893 0.51865 1.109312A CO_STREX 2.160562 2.346256 2.785419 3.129575 1.083381 0.63132 1.136225 0.005919328 1.895072 0.139137 9.034026 0.699825 2.132057 A CO2_NBIO_IDLEX 0000 8.942095 14.00074 73.35401 1065.376459 91.92835 0 0 347.3949 0A CO2_NBIO_RUNEX 245.2799 292.9084 316.762 383.4057 794.1566 768.7296 1095.065 1436.676046 1341.742 1597.13 210.1672 1060.994 1532.749 A CO2_NBIO_STREX 52.01687 62.87067 68.57931 82.01676 11.82811 7.832833 9.380273 0.049284883 15.47806 1.390925 61.03922 3.981795 18.67936A NOX_IDLEX 0000 0.058295 0.098034 0.431519 5.438234036 0.369473 0 0 3.527869 0A NOX_RUNEX 0.033072 0.078073 0.067378 0.083492 0.730308 0.876464 1.444056 2.680938629 1.441249 0.728908 1.148719 4.873886 1.363761A NOX_STREX 0.176158 0.230265 0.270417 0.324369 0.321259 0.182356 1.696526 2.321334599 1.089647 0.010032 0.270672 0.811844 0.245583A PM10_IDLEX 0000 0.000825 0.001423 0.000427 0.00267045 0.00012 0 0 0.003905 0A PM10_PMBW 0.03675 0.03675 0.03675 0.03675 0.07644 0.08918 0.13034 0.060919337 0.13034 0.069383 0.01176 0.7448 0.13034A PM10_PMTW 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.009747 0.01075 0.012 0.03551304 0.012 0.033326 0.004 0.010909 0.013099 A PM10_RUNEX 0.001356 0.001766 0.001389 0.001511 0.01021 0.015665 0.006955 0.024670765 0.007029 0.005328 0.001969 0.031247 0.023972 A PM10_STREX 0.001744 0.002244 0.001745 0.001909 0.000258 0.000133 0.000119 7.19411E‐07 0.000142 1.52E‐05 0.003039 4.55E‐05 0.000274A PM25_IDLEX 0000 0.00079 0.001361 0.000409 0.002554927 0.000115 0 0 0.003736 0A PM25_PMBW 0.01575 0.01575 0.01575 0.01575 0.03276 0.03822 0.05586 0.026108287 0.05586 0.029736 0.00504 0.3192 0.05586A PM25_PMTW 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002437 0.002688 0.003 0.00887826 0.003 0.008332 0.001 0.002727 0.003275A PM25_RUNEX 0.001249 0.001625 0.001279 0.001393 0.00972 0.014962 0.006648 0.023603494 0.006712 0.005096 0.00184 0.029882 0.022889 A PM25_STREX 0.001604 0.002063 0.001605 0.001756 0.000237 0.000123 0.00011 6.61472E‐07 0.00013 1.4E‐05 0.002859 4.18E‐05 0.000252A ROG_DIURN 0.038084 0.081984 0.061288 0.070174 0.002024 0.00107 0.000417 2.53874E‐06 0.001084 1.94E‐05 1.809555 0.000537 0.707189A ROG_HTSK 0.09006 0.15803 0.120816 0.135544 0.075635 0.041911 0.019674 0.00011586 0.016051 0.000133 0.689105 0.005221 0.05968 A ROG_IDLEX 0000 0.021316 0.015901 0.018316 0.428946297 0.045786 0 0 0.241386 0 A ROG_RESTL 0.033665 0.06596 0.058242 0.067485 0.001032 0.000547 0.000211 1.40536E‐06 0.00048 7.82E‐06 0.985054 0.000227 0.247171A ROG_RUNEX 0.007459 0.017917 0.013146 0.016466 0.092959 0.111603 0.017071 0.025760254 0.025484 0.019672 2.208057 0.086453 0.06941A ROG_RUNLS 0.202838 0.577726 0.418479 0.440788 0.521043 0.276429 0.112019 0.000593596 0.177971 0.000592 1.969445 0.035286 1.439379A ROG_STREX 0.211356 0.306088 0.307495 0.382282 0.075776 0.042231 0.050853 2.56712E‐06 0.090401 0.005883 1.941958 0.027318 0.096685A SO2_IDLEX 0000 8.68E‐05 0.000134 0.000696 0.009914298 0.000873 0 0 0.003306 0A SO2_RUNEX 9.26E‐05 0.002616 0.010439 0.003743 0.007755 0.007424 0.010439 0.013153522 0.012917 0.011293 0.00208 0.010129 0.015045A SO2_STREX 0 0 9.28E‐05 0.000802 0.000117 7.75E‐05 9.28E‐05 4.87714E‐07 0.000153 1.38E‐05 0.000604 3.94E‐05 0.000185 A TOG_DIURN 0.038084 0.081984 0.061288 0.070174 0.002024 0.00107 0.000417 2.53874E‐06 0.001084 1.94E‐05 1.809555 0.000537 0.707189A TOG_HTSK 0.09006 0.15803 0.120816 0.135544 0.075635 0.041911 0.019674 0.00011586 0.016051 0.000133 0.689105 0.005221 0.05968 A TOG_IDLEX 0000 0.030064 0.021432 0.02485 0.493262188 0.059237 0 0 0.345172 0A TOG_RESTL 0.033665 0.06596 0.058242 0.067485 0.001032 0.000547 0.000211 1.40536E‐06 0.00048 7.82E‐06 0.985054 0.000227 0.247171A TOG_RUNEX 0.010845 0.026122 0.019145 0.023909 0.114266 0.130419 0.021706 0.078007034 0.034475 1.37699 2.736079 0.103211 0.092037A TOG_RUNLS 0.202838 0.577726 0.418479 0.440788 0.521043 0.276429 0.112019 0.000593596 0.177971 0.000592 1.969445 0.035286 1.439379A TOG_STREX 0.231408 0.335127 0.336668 0.418547 0.082966 0.046238 0.055677 2.81067E‐06 0.098977 0.006441 2.11358 0.02991 0.105858 CalEEMod EMFAC2017 Emission Factors Input
Year 2023
FleetMixLandUseSubType LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MHHotel 0.590598 0.05278 0.17808 0.10708 0.021013 0.005252 0.013411 0.022089 0.001622 0.001261 0.005132 0.000923 0.000759Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.590598 0.05278 0.17808 0.10708 0.021013 0.005252 0.013411 0.022089 0.001622 0.001261 0.005132 0.000923 0.000759Other Non‐Asphalt Surface 0.590598 0.05278 0.17808 0.10708 0.021013 0.005252 0.013411 0.022089 0.001622 0.001261 0.005132 0.000923 0.000759 Parking Lot 0.590598 0.05278 0.17808 0.10708 0.021013 0.005252 0.013411 0.022089 0.001622 0.001261 0.005132 0.000923 0.000759Unenclosed Parking with E 0.590598 0.05278 0.17808 0.10708 0.021013 0.005252 0.013411 0.022089 0.001622 0.001261 0.005132 0.000923 0.000759 CalEEMod EMFAC2017 Fleet Mix Input
Year 2030
Season EmissionType LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MHA CH4_IDLEX 0000 0.004148 0.002505 0.003832 0.024231453 0.007098 0 0 0.070082 0 A CH4_RUNEX 0.000959 0.001671 0.001726 0.001772 0.005195 0.005339 0.001034 0.04518098 0.002197 1.859484 0.319087 0.004404 0.005027A CH4_STREX 0.028931 0.035248 0.041821 0.043924 0.009023 0.004811 0.008383 4.34672E‐07 0.015222 0.002186 0.24786 0.006338 0.019545A CO_IDLEX 0000 0.17731 0.131894 0.405402 6.28489984 0.644155 0 0 2.927328 0 A CO_RUNEX 0.411156 0.540474 0.559142 0.551517 0.468742 0.489111 0.152189 0.405949458 0.262856 14.11073 17.60732 0.374881 0.311691A CO_STREX 1.716961 1.849789 2.287973 2.324828 0.890393 0.484256 0.872515 0.006685308 1.577018 0.139137 9.199577 0.858725 1.635194A CO2_NBIO_IDLEX 0000 8.251826 13.00041 65.09769 930.0496847 97.36242 0 0 337.4754 0 A CO2_NBIO_RUNEX 213.8884 258.4057 267.3331 322.2663 698.5465 679.813 993.4479 1226.348086 1210.85 1668.671 209.7572 970.5049 1350.267 A CO2_NBIO_STREX 45.12682 55.17203 57.56738 67.91602 10.09364 6.438033 8.550649 0.051649278 13.46187 1.401901 59.22586 5.059627 15.54123A NOX_IDLEX 0000 0.045908 0.074209 0.341766 5.199426871 0.431935 0 0 2.710433 0A NOX_RUNEX 0.019319 0.033468 0.034489 0.035665 0.299902 0.384329 1.428316 2.517362076 1.448391 0.706433 1.137409 3.086533 1.063099A NOX_STREX 0.125333 0.151052 0.168209 0.179169 0.225227 0.124883 1.689216 2.314548745 1.129093 0.015157 0.270173 1.184451 0.23668A PM10_IDLEX 0000 0.000915 0.001502 0.000162 0.002145897 0.000142 0 0 0.002048 0A PM10_PMBW 0.03675 0.03675 0.03675 0.03675 0.07644 0.08918 0.13034 0.061109857 0.13034 0.069383 0.01176 0.7448 0.13034A PM10_PMTW 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.009901 0.010844 0.012 0.035621239 0.012 0.033326 0.004 0.010676 0.013189 A PM10_RUNEX 0.000929 0.00107 0.001025 0.001034 0.007019 0.013839 0.007006 0.023790073 0.007882 0.005116 0.002138 0.021245 0.016043 A PM10_STREX 0.001275 0.001461 0.00134 0.001344 0.00021 0.000106 0.000112 5.80093E‐07 0.000156 1.52E‐05 0.002862 6.76E‐05 0.000212 A PM25_IDLEX 0000 0.000875 0.001437 0.000155 0.002053066 0.000136 0 0 0.00196 0A PM25_PMBW 0.01575 0.01575 0.01575 0.01575 0.03276 0.03822 0.05586 0.026189939 0.05586 0.029736 0.00504 0.3192 0.05586A PM25_PMTW 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002475 0.002711 0.003 0.00890531 0.003 0.008332 0.001 0.002669 0.003297A PM25_RUNEX 0.000855 0.000984 0.000944 0.000954 0.006671 0.013218 0.006696 0.022760894 0.007526 0.004893 0.001994 0.02031 0.015312A PM25_STREX 0.001172 0.001344 0.001232 0.001236 0.000193 9.76E‐05 0.000103 5.33374E‐07 0.000144 1.4E‐05 0.002676 6.22E‐05 0.000195A ROG_DIURN 0.024903 0.046388 0.048996 0.057349 0.001403 0.000642 0.000289 1.32994E‐06 0.001062 6.14E‐05 1.786807 0.00087 0.347564A ROG_HTSK 0.061657 0.093564 0.089096 0.0981 0.054855 0.024352 0.013852 5.78076E‐05 0.015622 0.000814 0.631299 0.008304 0.028392 A ROG_IDLEX 0000 0.01734 0.013466 0.01847 0.422100311 0.050126 0 0 0.322319 0 A ROG_RESTL 0.022934 0.041206 0.048532 0.056738 0.000772 0.000374 0.000168 7.97633E‐07 0.000487 3.58E‐05 0.946881 0.000414 0.1401A ROG_RUNEX 0.003247 0.0065 0.006553 0.006887 0.072661 0.0982 0.011844 0.024014489 0.016744 0.026969 2.128511 0.060159 0.038911 A ROG_RUNLS 0.170512 0.364405 0.336782 0.340289 0.429696 0.143744 0.071507 0.000284481 0.181965 0.004928 1.487321 0.053902 0.535482A ROG_STREX 0.118715 0.154126 0.182707 0.199251 0.043726 0.022756 0.041407 2.2699E‐06 0.076636 0.009261 1.877593 0.036024 0.074231 A SO2_IDLEX 0000 7.99E‐05 0.000124 0.000618 0.00865265 0.000924 0 0 0.003219 0A SO2_RUNEX 9E‐05 0.002567 0.00948 0.002976 0.006812 0.006557 0.00948 0.011212041 0.011649 0.010417 0.002076 0.009288 0.013242A SO2_STREX 0 0 8.46E‐05 0.000628 9.99E‐05 6.37E‐05 8.46E‐05 5.11111E‐07 0.000133 1.39E‐05 0.000586 5.01E‐05 0.000154A TOG_DIURN 0.024903 0.046388 0.048996 0.057349 0.001403 0.000642 0.000289 1.32994E‐06 0.001062 6.14E‐05 1.786807 0.00087 0.347564A TOG_HTSK 0.061657 0.093564 0.089096 0.0981 0.054855 0.024352 0.013852 5.78076E‐05 0.015622 0.000814 0.631299 0.008304 0.028392 A TOG_IDLEX 0000 0.02413 0.017772 0.025282 0.485180108 0.063906 0 0 0.463821 0 A TOG_RESTL 0.022934 0.041206 0.048532 0.056738 0.000772 0.000374 0.000168 7.97633E‐07 0.000487 3.58E‐05 0.946881 0.000414 0.1401A TOG_RUNEX 0.004716 0.009483 0.009524 0.009983 0.08579 0.112949 0.014288 0.071682245 0.021563 1.898202 2.666273 0.071678 0.048331 A TOG_RUNLS 0.170512 0.364405 0.336782 0.340289 0.429696 0.143744 0.071507 0.000284481 0.181965 0.004928 1.487321 0.053902 0.535482A TOG_STREX 0.129977 0.168749 0.200041 0.218155 0.047875 0.024915 0.045336 2.48526E‐06 0.083906 0.01014 2.04481 0.039442 0.081274 CalEEMod EMFAC2017 Emission Factors Input
Year 2030
FleetMixLandUseSubType LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MHHotel 0.595423 0.053963 0.1714 0.106522 0.021043 0.005556 0.013639 0.023425 0.001443 0.001178 0.00478 0.0009 0.000728Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.595423 0.053963 0.1714 0.106522 0.021043 0.005556 0.013639 0.023425 0.001443 0.001178 0.00478 0.0009 0.000728Other Non‐Asphalt Surface 0.595423 0.053963 0.1714 0.106522 0.021043 0.005556 0.013639 0.023425 0.001443 0.001178 0.00478 0.0009 0.000728 Parking Lot 0.595423 0.053963 0.1714 0.106522 0.021043 0.005556 0.013639 0.023425 0.001443 0.001178 0.00478 0.0009 0.000728Unenclosed Parking with E 0.595423 0.053963 0.1714 0.106522 0.021043 0.005556 0.013639 0.023425 0.001443 0.001178 0.00478 0.0009 0.000728 CalEEMod EMFAC2017 Fleet Mix Input
NOx
Exhaust
TOG
Evaporative
TOG
Exhaust
PM
Exhaust
CO
Exhaust
CO2
Exhaust
1 1 1111 *PM Exhaust off model factor is only applied to the PM Exhaust emissions not start/idle

1.0002 1.0001 1.0002 1.0009 1.0005 1.00231.0004 1.0003 1.0004 1.0018 1.0014 1.00651.0007 1.0006 1.0007 1.0032 1.0027 1.01261.0012 1.0010 1.0011 1.0051 1.0044 1.02071.0018 1.0016 1.0016 1.0074 1.0065 1.03091.0023 1.0022 1.0020 1.0091 1.0083 1.0394 Enter NA in the date field if adjustments do not apply

1.0028 1.0028 1.0024 1.0105 1.0102 1.04751.0034 1.0035 1.0028 1.0117 1.0120 1.05541.0040 1.0042 1.0032 1.0129 1.0138 1.06291.0047 1.0051 1.0037 1.0142 1.0156 1.07021.0054 1.0061 1.0042 1.0155 1.0173 1.07701.0061 1.0072 1.0047 1.0169 1.0189 1.08341.0068 1.0083 1.0052 1.0182 1.0204 1.08931.0075 1.0095 1.0058 1.0196 1.0218 1.09471.0081 1.0108 1.0063 1.0210 1.0232 1.09971.0088 1.0121 1.0069 1.0223 1.0244 1.10411.0094 1.0134 1.0074 1.0236 1.0255 1.10801.0099 1.0148 1.0079 1.0248 1.0265 1.11141.0104 1.0161 1.0085 1.0259 1.0274 1.11431.0109 1.0174 1.0090 1.0270 1.0281 1.11681.0113 1.0186 1.0095 1.0279 1.0288 1.11891.0116 1.0198 1.0099 1.0286 1.0294 1.12071.0119 1.0207 1.0103 1.0293 1.0299 1.12211.0122 1.0216 1.0106 1.0299 1.0303 1.12331.0124 1.0225 1.0109 1.0303 1.0306 1.12431.0125 1.0233 1.0111 1.0308 1.0309 1.12511.0127 1.0240 1.0113 1.0311 1.0311 1.12581.0128 1.0246 1.0115 1.0314 1.0313 1.12631.0128 1.0252 1.0116 1.0316 1.0315 1.12681.0129 1.0257 1.0117 1.0318 1.0316 1.1272 Enter Year: 2021 1.0002 1.0001 1.0002 1.0009 1.0005 1.0023 2024
Year
2021202220232042203620252026202720282029203020312032203320342035 The off-model adjustment factors need to be applied only to emissions from gasoline light duty vehicles (LDA, LDT1, LDT2 and MDV). Please note that the adjustment factors are by calendar year and includes all model years.

Adjustment Factors for EMFAC2017 Gasoline Light Duty Vehicles 20492050
NA
20432044204520462047204820372038203920402041
Source: EMFAC2017 (v1.0.3) Emission Rates
Region Type: CountyRegion: Santa ClaraCalendar Year: 2021Season: AnnualVehicle Classification: EMFAC2007 CategoriesUnits: miles/day for VMT, trips/day for Trips, g/mile for RUNEX, PMBW and PMTW, g/trip for STREX, HOTSOAK and RUNLOSS, g/vehicle/day for IDLEX, RESTLOSS and DIURNRegion Calendar Y Vehicle CatModel Yea Speed Fuel Population VMT Trips NOx_RUNENOx_IDLEXNOx_STREXPM2.5_RU PM2.5_IDL PM2.5_STRPM2.5_PMPM2.5_PMPM10_RUNPM10_IDLEPM10_STR PM10_PMTPM10_PMBCO2_RUNECO2_IDLEXCO2_STREXCH4_RUNECH4_IDLEXCH4_STREXN2O_RUNEN2O_IDLEXN2O_STREXROG_RUNEROG_IDLEXROG_STREXROG_HOTSROG_RUNLROG_REST ROG_DIUR TOG_RUNETOG_IDLEXTOG_STREXTOG_HOTSTOG_RUNLTOG_RESTLTOG_DIUR CO_RUNEXCO_IDLEX CO_STREX SOx_RUNE SOx_IDLEX SOx_STREX Santa Clara 2021 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 5.162845 484.6824 103.2982 4.062598 0 0.407731 0.001311 0 0.000823 0.005 0.02646 0.001426 0 0.000895 0.02 0.06174 2025.269 0 47.29512 0.112325 0 0.000414 0.149526 0 0.012575 0.585782 0 0.002169 0.156953 0.96912 0.038977 0.070674 0.854771 0 0.002374 0.156953 0.96912 0.038977 0.070674 32.05552 0 5.02137 0.020042 0 0.000468 Santa Clara 2021 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 8105.749 988266.7 86260.08 4.147844 63.6365 1.887942 0.058758 0.087222 0 0.008868 0.026073 0.061415 0.091165 0 0.035473 0.060837 1528.481 11606.57 0 0.006422 0.218177 0 0.240256 1.824391 0 0.138263 4.697294 00000 0.157402 5.347512 00000 0.5229 60.00634 0 0.01444 0.109653 0 Santa Clara 2021 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Natural Ga 336.2009 13706.54 1311.183 1.939434 21.5699 0 0.005088 0.034407 0 0.009 0.02646 0.005318 0.035962 0 0.036 0.06174 3233.282 4101.533 0 3.57235 1.261083 0 0.659126 0.836124 0 0.176593 0.0496 00000 3.788896 1.323011 00000 10.63714 21.51231 0000 Santa Clara 2021 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 715693.3 26189161 3369392 0.044609 0 0.21159 0.001358 0 0.001822 0.002 0.01575 0.001477 0 0.001981 0.008 0.03675 266.3197 0 56.92202 0.002711 0 0.058853 0.004863 0 0.027764 0.010662 0 0.269366 0.108645 0.230465 0.191774 0.221801 0.015551 0 0.294921 0.108645 0.230465 0.191774 0.221801 0.690036 0 2.392069 0.002635 0 0.000563 Santa Clara 2021 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 6670.999 255156.4 31695.34 0.087271 0 0 0.007648 0 0 0.002 0.01575 0.007994 0 0 0.008 0.03675 205.4073 0 0 0.000708 0 0 0.032287 0 0 0.015244 000000 0.017354 000000 0.210705 0 0 0.001942 0 0 Santa Clara 2021 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 24022.27 869835.7 117842.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.002 0.01575 0 0 0 0.008 0.03675 000000000000 0.004888 0 0.00456 0.017501 0 0 0 0.004888 0 0.00456 0.017501 000000Santa Clara 2021 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 71628.15 2413668 331256 0.105802 0 0.272111 0.001862 0 0.002385 0.002 0.01575 0.002025 0 0.002594 0.008 0.03675 308.1227 0 66.19689 0.005661 0 0.076866 0.008066 0 0.03002 0.024911 0 0.384911 0.189186 0.681609 0.358705 0.461608 0.036311 0 0.421425 0.189186 0.681609 0.358705 0.461608 1.200263 0 2.537143 0.003049 0 0.000655 Santa Clara 2021 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 39.89374 725.5582 131.2284 1.268412 0 0 0.168474 0 0 0.002 0.01575 0.176091 0 0 0.008 0.03675 413.9966 0 0 0.010139 0 0 0.065074 0 0 0.218297 000000 0.248517 000000 1.237222 0 0 0.003914 0 0 Santa Clara 2021 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 483.8807 18039.76 2391.303 0 0 0000 0.002 0.01575 0 0 0 0.008 0.03675 000000000000 0.004888 0 0.00456 0.017501 0 0 0 0.004888 0 0.00456 0.017501 000000 Santa Clara 2021 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 246759.9 8311704 1150425 0.087782 0 0.326789 0.001356 0 0.001737 0.002 0.01575 0.001475 0 0.001889 0.008 0.03675 338.518 0 73.70907 0.004072 0 0.077467 0.007118 0 0.035187 0.01674 0 0.36702 0.133338 0.446757 0.285742 0.307995 0.024414 0 0.40184 0.133338 0.446757 0.285742 0.307995 0.930639 0 3.014399 0.00335 0 0.000729 Santa Clara 2021 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1518.218 59025.65 7458.416 0.041668 0 0 0.004904 0 0 0.002 0.01575 0.005126 0 0 0.008 0.03675 282.8504 0 0 0.000657 0 0 0.04446 0 0 0.01415 000000 0.016109 000000 0.12212 0 0 0.002674 0 0Santa Clara 2021 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 2166.546 67548.49 10876.24 0 0 0000 0.002 0.01575 0 0 0 0.008 0.03675 000000000000 0.004888 0 0.00456 0.017501 0 0 0 0.004888 0 0.00456 0.017501 000000 Santa Clara 2021 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 16540.61 571642.7 246430.4 0.262338 0.03949 0.549198 0.002191 0 0.000401 0.002 0.03276 0.002383 0 0.000436 0.008 0.07644 1017.255 122.0379 19.14342 0.012124 0.123606 0.02716 0.015765 0.003154 0.042297 0.059375 0.45228 0.137987 0.130258 0.89758 0.02599 0.052227 0.08664 0.659966 0.151079 0.130258 0.89758 0.02599 0.052227 1.086844 3.748723 1.811769 0.010067 0.001208 0.000189Santa Clara 2021 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 10609.08 409397.3 133448.8 1.862203 2.152154 0 0.023297 0.02704 0 0.003 0.03276 0.02435 0.028263 0 0.012 0.07644 552.5074 134.745 0 0.007585 0.005098 0 0.086846 0.02118 0 0.163311 0.10976 00000 0.185919 0.124954 00000 0.686231 0.909745 0 0.005223 0.001274 0Santa Clara 2021 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 2219.575 77018.29 33068.36 0.272207 0.039035 0.535592 0.002122 0 0.00036 0.002 0.03822 0.002307 0 0.000392 0.008 0.08918 1160.22 140.2323 21.7453 0.010038 0.122897 0.026292 0.016913 0.003077 0.040901 0.045762 0.447168 0.133103 0.127611 0.884759 0.023996 0.048928 0.066776 0.652507 0.145731 0.127611 0.884759 0.023996 0.048928 0.835401 3.750559 1.839341 0.011481 0.001388 0.000215 Santa Clara 2021 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4214.571 160661.6 53014 1.542154 2.158821 0 0.022944 0.027219 0 0.003 0.03822 0.023981 0.02845 0 0.012 0.08918 621.5562 215.9968 0 0.007204 0.005098 0 0.0977 0.033952 0 0.155094 0.10976 0 0 0 0 0 0.176564 0.124954 00000 0.650931 0.909745 0 0.005876 0.002042 0Santa Clara 2021 MCY Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 32119.63 239436.8 64239.26 1.15497 0 0.270443 0.001772 0 0.00303 0.001 0.00504 0.001893 0 0.003213 0.004 0.01176 210.3906 0 61.75755 0.33122 0 0.25818 0.066438 0 0.015338 2.253066 0 1.967635 0.716612 2.132348 1.002545 1.822873 2.774349 0 2.14098 0.716612 2.132348 1.002545 1.822873 19.56337 0 8.976601 0.002082 0 0.000611 Santa Clara 2021 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 149542.9 4865312 690430.3 0.11839 0 0.410054 0.001476 0 0.002019 0.002 0.01575 0.001604 0 0.002194 0.008 0.03675 409.4409 0 89.81723 0.005494 0 0.095775 0.008922 0 0.03884 0.024634 0 0.48393 0.15482 0.49034 0.340146 0.361645 0.034949 0 0.529797 0.15482 0.49034 0.340146 0.361645 1.127252 0 3.59329 0.004052 0 0.000889 Santa Clara 2021 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 3426.389 128242 16726.03 0.044109 0 0 0.004602 0 0 0.002 0.01575 0.00481 0 0 0.008 0.03675 370.3019 0 0 0.000514 0 0 0.058206 0 0 0.011068 000000 0.0126 000000 0.188966 0 0 0.003501 0 0 Santa Clara 2021 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 687.5446 22639.78 3509.471 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.002 0.01575 0 0 0 0.008 0.03675 000000000000 0.004888 0 0.00456 0.017501 0 0 0 0.004888 0 0.00456 0.017501 000000Santa Clara 2021 MH Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 2931.22 26379 293.2393 0.474084 0 0.332292 0.001724 0 0.000381 0.003 0.05586 0.001875 0 0.000414 0.012 0.13034 1782.907 0 26.40751 0.017557 0 0.033119 0.028008 0 0.03399 0.078746 0 0.143103 0.096257 2.347589 0.039223 0.115979 0.114906 0 0.15668 0.096257 2.347589 0.039223 0.115979 2.065959 0 3.165436 0.017643 0 0.000261 Santa Clara 2021 MH Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 984.446 9504.941 98.4446 4.382014 0 0 0.092722 0 0 0.004 0.05586 0.096914 0 0 0.016 0.13034 1031.304 0 0 0.005198 0 0 0.162107 0 0 0.111901 000000 0.127391 000000 0.400207 0 0 0.00975 0 0 Santa Clara 2021 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1410.134 72248.39 28213.97 0.591018 0.088168 0.389628 0.001358 0 0.000497 0.003 0.05586 0.001477 0 0.00054 0.012 0.13034 1752.404 539.4334 40.1358 0.018696 0.257865 0.042095 0.027833 0.0072 0.028931 0.092815 1.007984 0.233354 0.09611 0.563096 0.020857 0.043005 0.135436 1.470848 0.255494 0.09611 0.563096 0.020857 0.043005 2.155492 15.06152 5.301778 0.017341 0.005338 0.000397 Santa Clara 2021 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 9487.148 545455.1 96101.91 3.194916 8.74953 1.398943 0.080969 0.02675 0 0.003 0.05586 0.08463 0.02796 0 0.012 0.13034 1081.992 930.4887 0 0.009431 0.005843 0 0.170074 0.14626 0 0.203046 0.125806 00000 0.231153 0.143221 00000 0.573058 2.609835 0 0.010222 0.008791 0 Santa Clara 2021 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 502.2127 24696.47 10048.27 0.501682 0.065104 0.329488 0.000916 0 0.000212 0.003 0.05586 0.000996 0 0.00023 0.012 0.13034 1793.018 381.4064 26.74037 0.014791 0.200187 0.030949 0.025044 0.005583 0.026445 0.070359 0.746923 0.159737 0.026848 0.294072 0.016083 0.036997 0.102667 1.089908 0.174892 0.026848 0.294072 0.016083 0.036997 1.576822 5.778528 3.351004 0.017743 0.003774 0.000265 Santa Clara 2021 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 767.9729 54443.73 7049.223 2.779706 13.63199 1.84 0.044765 0.045778 0 0.003 0.05586 0.046789 0.047848 0 0.012 0.13034 1202.163 1945.083 0 0.005321 0.035079 0 0.188963 0.30574 0 0.114561 0.755235 00000 0.130419 0.859777 00000 0.397353 8.822131 0 0.011357 0.018376 0 Santa Clara 2021 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 235.3456 11037.57 941.3825 0.448701 0.923977 0.560273 0.001205 0 0.000494 0.002 0.3192 0.001311 0 0.000537 0.008 0.7448 872.735 2601.946 49.24562 0.012804 2.443216 0.058897 0.025163 0.088108 0.05292 0.063019 10.60409 0.336056 0.060254 0.423958 0.009983 0.025 0.091957 15.47346 0.367939 0.060254 0.423958 0.009983 0.025 1.371308 82.01386 8.8054 0.008636 0.025748 0.000487 Santa Clara 2021 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1013.214 32006.31 11692.35 6.970742 45.79682 0.74176 0.043352 0.053733 0 0.003 0.3192 0.045313 0.056163 0 0.012 0.7448 1153.149 3727.733 0 0.004763 0.013307 0 0.181259 0.585948 0 0.102551 0.286497 00000 0.116746 0.326154 00000 0.279558 5.707206 0 0.010894 0.035218 0 Santa Clara 2021 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 8.415569 1059.368 33.66228 0.456042 0 1.173674 0.000327 0 9.66E‐05 0.003 0.05586 0.000355 0 0.000105 0.012 0.13034 2351.957 0 104.4673 0.006811 0 0.169572 0.0345 0 0.088962 0.022728 0 0.727258 0.171351 1.189018 0.028073 0.044636 0.033164 0 0.796256 0.171351 1.189018 0.028073 0.044636 0.499495 0 8.852622 0.023275 0 0.001034 Santa Clara 2021 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 423.0651 46463.12 1692.26 0.803452 0 0 0.005651 0 0 0.008415 0.029326 0.005907 0 0 0.03366 0.068427 1481.161 0 0 0.077358 0 0 0.232818 0 0 0.001105 000000 0.078949 000000 0.131304 0 0 0.014002 0 0 Santa Clara 2021 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Natural Ga 103.9599 12318.22 415.8396 0.489341 0 0 0.003183 0 0 0.008475 0.029034 0.003327 0 0 0.033899 0.067745 2016.304 0 0 6.413624 0 0 0.411037 0 0 0.091638 000000 6.545574 000000 49.80412 00000 Source: EMFAC2017 (v1.0.3) Emission Rates
Region Type: CountyRegion: Santa ClaraCalendar Year: 2022Season: AnnualVehicle Classification: EMFAC2007 CategoriesUnits: miles/day for VMT, trips/day for Trips, g/mile for RUNEX, PMBW and PMTW, g/trip for STREX, HOTSOAK and RUNLOSS, g/vehicle/day for IDLEX, RESTLOSS and DIURNRegion Calendar Y Vehicle CatModel Yea Speed Fuel Population VMT Trips NOx_RUNENOx_IDLEXNOx_STREXPM2.5_RU PM2.5_IDL PM2.5_STRPM2.5_PMPM2.5_PMPM10_RUNPM10_IDLEPM10_STR PM10_PMTPM10_PMBCO2_RUNECO2_IDLEXCO2_STREXCH4_RUNECH4_IDLEXCH4_STREXN2O_RUNEN2O_IDLEXN2O_STREXROG_RUNEROG_IDLEXROG_STREXROG_HOTSROG_RUNLROG_REST ROG_DIUR TOG_RUNETOG_IDLEXTOG_STREXTOG_HOTSTOG_RUNLTOG_RESTLTOG_DIUR CO_RUNEXCO_IDLEX CO_STREX SOx_RUNE SOx_IDLEX SOx_STREX Santa Clara 2022 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 4.973172 516.9338 99.50323 3.654204 0 0.338391 0.001236 0 0.000744 0.005 0.02646 0.001344 0 0.00081 0.02 0.06174 1964.961 0 46.86739 0.097725 0 0.00044 0.140899 0 0.010576 0.494672 0 0.002301 0.136891 0.830556 0.033943 0.061166 0.721824 0 0.00252 0.136891 0.830556 0.033943 0.061166 30.00648 0 5.27737 0.019445 0 0.000464 Santa Clara 2022 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 8277.463 1011013 88031.26 3.535499 63.08378 2.080194 0.033949 0.03347 0 0.008873 0.026088 0.035484 0.034983 0 0.035494 0.060872 1486.606 11783.13 0 0.003901 0.215524 0 0.233674 1.852143 0 0.08399 4.640183 00000 0.095616 5.282495 00000 0.366847 63.30293 0 0.014045 0.111321 0 Santa Clara 2022 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Natural Ga 348.7902 14223.14 1360.282 1.755776 21.14752 0 0.004789 0.030991 0 0.009 0.02646 0.005006 0.032392 0 0.036 0.06174 3203.692 4060.116 0 3.511574 1.248503 0 0.653093 0.827681 0 0.161697 0.045805 00000 3.710887 1.306054 00000 10.70122 21.55662 0000 Santa Clara 2022 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 733557.7 26455304 3456649 0.03872 0 0.197227 0.001299 0 0.001748 0.002 0.01575 0.001413 0 0.001902 0.008 0.03675 259.2126 0 55.39361 0.002345 0 0.054199 0.004449 0 0.026685 0.009015 0 0.243726 0.100881 0.22086 0.178182 0.20337 0.013151 0 0.266848 0.100881 0.22086 0.178182 0.20337 0.63218 0 2.325265 0.002565 0 0.000548 Santa Clara 2022 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 7146.668 268335.1 33963.02 0.071556 0 0 0.006579 0 0 0.002 0.01575 0.006877 0 0 0.008 0.03675 200.3149 0 0 0.000626 0 0 0.031487 0 0 0.013485 000000 0.015352 000000 0.198488 0 0 0.001894 0 0 Santa Clara 2022 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 25894.61 943282.8 126428 000000 0.002 0.01575 0 0 0 0.008 0.03675 000000000000 0.004888 0 0.00456 0.017501 0 0 0 0.004888 0 0.00456 0.017501 000000 Santa Clara 2022 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 73556.92 2443329 340743.8 0.091156 0 0.251292 0.001724 0 0.002226 0.002 0.01575 0.001875 0 0.002421 0.008 0.03675 300.527 0 64.49485 0.004882 0 0.070027 0.007217 0 0.028775 0.021236 0 0.344801 0.173613 0.628849 0.332831 0.420667 0.030964 0 0.377511 0.173613 0.628849 0.332831 0.420667 1.068397 0 2.450832 0.002974 0 0.000638Santa Clara 2022 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 36.8388 667.9121 121.0603 1.185315 0 0 0.157566 0 0 0.002 0.01575 0.164691 0 0 0.008 0.03675 408.3259 0 0 0.009501 0 0 0.064183 0 0 0.204561 000000 0.232879 000000 1.159574 0 0 0.00386 0 0 Santa Clara 2022 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 624.8771 24059.07 3099.469 0 0 0000 0.002 0.01575 0 0 0 0.008 0.03675 000000000000 0.004888 0 0.00456 0.017501 0 0 0 0.004888 0 0.00456 0.017501 000000 Santa Clara 2022 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 250455.4 8295824 1167439 0.077278 0 0.299792 0.001307 0 0.001684 0.002 0.01575 0.001421 0 0.001831 0.008 0.03675 327.6413 0 71.42656 0.003665 0 0.072415 0.006473 0 0.033384 0.014906 0 0.339292 0.128171 0.436499 0.281495 0.299507 0.021744 0 0.371482 0.128171 0.436499 0.281495 0.299507 0.860463 0 2.923834 0.003242 0 0.000707 Santa Clara 2022 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1663.513 62652.21 8136.947 0.039252 0 0 0.004754 0 0 0.002 0.01575 0.004969 0 0 0.008 0.03675 275.5741 0 0 0.000647 0 0 0.043316 0 0 0.013935 000000 0.015864 000000 0.123161 0 0 0.002605 0 0Santa Clara 2022 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 2695.96 82111.52 13502.44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.002 0.01575 0 0 0 0.008 0.03675 000000000000 0.004888 0 0.00456 0.017501 0 0 0 0.004888 0 0.00456 0.017501 000000Santa Clara 2022 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 16536.9 566343.8 246375.2 0.235238 0.038471 0.530556 0.002161 0 0.000388 0.002 0.03276 0.00235 0 0.000422 0.008 0.07644 1006.569 121.1222 18.98971 0.01086 0.121305 0.025473 0.014262 0.003125 0.041267 0.052874 0.440699 0.129054 0.125369 0.861898 0.025267 0.050121 0.077153 0.643067 0.141298 0.125369 0.861898 0.025267 0.050121 0.97349 3.751848 1.764958 0.009961 0.001199 0.000188 Santa Clara 2022 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 11104.44 423266.4 139679.8 1.613919 2.033114 0 0.021273 0.026869 0 0.003 0.03276 0.022235 0.028084 0 0.012 0.07644 544.3042 133.047 0 0.007318 0.005098 0 0.085557 0.020913 0 0.157544 0.10976 00000 0.179353 0.124954 00000 0.661457 0.909745 0 0.005146 0.001258 0 Santa Clara 2022 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 2253.3 77523.96 33570.81 0.240034 0.037891 0.516259 0.002078 0 0.000346 0.002 0.03822 0.00226 0 0.000377 0.008 0.08918 1147.291 139.0737 21.54397 0.008737 0.120275 0.024583 0.015135 0.003045 0.039911 0.039365 0.434196 0.123837 0.121118 0.819863 0.023133 0.046225 0.057441 0.633578 0.135586 0.121118 0.819863 0.023133 0.046225 0.722025 3.75488 1.776904 0.011353 0.001376 0.000213 Santa Clara 2022 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4438.985 166319.5 55836.85 1.346918 2.041795 0 0.021771 0.027131 0 0.003 0.03822 0.022756 0.028358 0 0.012 0.08918 612.5422 213.4891 0 0.007003 0.005098 0 0.096283 0.033558 0 0.150761 0.10976 00000 0.171631 0.124954 00000 0.634383 0.909745 0 0.005791 0.002018 0 Santa Clara 2022 MCY Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 32925.36 241011 65850.71 1.151611 0 0.270649 0.001812 0 0.002978 0.001 0.00504 0.001937 0 0.003161 0.004 0.01176 210.2729 0 61.39967 0.328946 0 0.256691 0.06628 0 0.015352 2.228751 0 1.954835 0.704215 2.060677 0.995009 1.817765 2.753726 0 2.127328 0.704215 2.060677 0.995009 1.817765 19.18808 0 9.0045 0.002081 0 0.000608 Santa Clara 2022 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 151961.1 4876240 702265.7 0.099589 0 0.371177 0.001397 0 0.001912 0.002 0.01575 0.001519 0 0.002079 0.008 0.03675 396.236 0 86.90417 0.004621 0 0.087878 0.007887 0 0.036541 0.019446 0 0.437645 0.147462 0.472734 0.331376 0.347901 0.028322 0 0.479161 0.147462 0.472734 0.331376 0.347901 0.980018 0 3.406111 0.003921 0 0.00086 Santa Clara 2022 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 3721.225 135478.8 18101.22 0.038775 0 0 0.004203 0 0 0.002 0.01575 0.004393 0 0 0.008 0.03675 360.3121 0 0 0.000478 0 0 0.056636 0 0 0.010285 000000 0.011709 000000 0.184421 0 0 0.003406 0 0 Santa Clara 2022 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 1080.167 34834.41 5508.057 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.002 0.01575 0 0 0 0.008 0.03675 000000000000 0.004888 0 0.00456 0.017501 0 0 0 0.004888 0 0.00456 0.017501 000000Santa Clara 2022 MH Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 2891.835 26265.33 289.2991 0.413359 0 0.334516 0.001633 0 0.000362 0.003 0.05586 0.001776 0 0.000394 0.012 0.13034 1756.095 0 25.97914 0.015124 0 0.032419 0.025426 0 0.034963 0.066433 0 0.137518 0.088945 2.156488 0.036513 0.106238 0.096939 0 0.150564 0.088945 2.156488 0.036513 0.106238 1.697423 0 3.037213 0.017378 0 0.000257Santa Clara 2022 MH Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1019.353 9712.32 101.9353 4.184918 0 0 0.085576 0 0 0.004 0.05586 0.089445 0 0 0.016 0.13034 1018.587 0 0 0.005027 0 0 0.160108 0 0 0.108225 000000 0.123206 000000 0.382773 0 0 0.009629 0 0Santa Clara 2022 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1456.112 75284.48 29133.88 0.474932 0.088412 0.377896 0.001319 0 0.000469 0.003 0.05586 0.001435 0 0.00051 0.012 0.13034 1722.789 532.6547 39.09903 0.014881 0.262553 0.04023 0.023376 0.007484 0.029181 0.072945 1.011617 0.219187 0.087649 0.506692 0.018903 0.038182 0.106442 1.47615 0.239982 0.087649 0.506692 0.018903 0.038182 1.680953 15.10368 4.939745 0.017048 0.005271 0.000387 Santa Clara 2022 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 9430.024 551923.8 94917.85 2.277066 7.413096 1.687822 0.039812 0.015538 0 0.003 0.05586 0.041612 0.01624 0 0.012 0.13034 1050.628 914.98 0 0.004378 0.004667 0 0.165144 0.143822 0 0.094265 0.100481 00000 0.107314 0.11439 00000 0.32147 2.58681 0 0.009926 0.008644 0 Santa Clara 2022 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 501.9655 24150.25 10043.33 0.443255 0.065137 0.32561 0.000952 0 0.000213 0.003 0.05586 0.001035 0 0.000232 0.012 0.13034 1767.375 377.9272 26.38965 0.013022 0.200837 0.030332 0.022732 0.005646 0.026387 0.061436 0.747416 0.156088 0.026802 0.295531 0.015889 0.036065 0.089647 1.090627 0.170897 0.026802 0.295531 0.015889 0.036065 1.365657 5.781487 3.261978 0.01749 0.00374 0.000261 Santa Clara 2022 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 762.3964 53839.19 6991.348 2.314382 10.4182 2.005848 0.021086 0.015288 0 0.003 0.05586 0.02204 0.015979 0 0.012 0.13034 1185.916 1892.098 0 0.002538 0.027964 0 0.18641 0.297411 0 0.054653 0.602048 00000 0.062218 0.685386 00000 0.239321 8.657847 0 0.011204 0.017876 0 Santa Clara 2022 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 249.3134 11500.83 997.2534 0.430325 0.924415 0.566946 0.001196 0 0.000498 0.002 0.3192 0.001301 0 0.000541 0.008 0.7448 865.5448 2582.545 48.67377 0.011856 2.442701 0.058309 0.024366 0.088243 0.053528 0.058325 10.61061 0.332747 0.061157 0.415506 0.010413 0.025261 0.085108 15.48298 0.364316 0.061157 0.415506 0.010413 0.025261 1.259002 82.05319 8.624782 0.008565 0.025556 0.000482 Santa Clara 2022 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1014.086 31965.96 11702.42 6.765334 45.00081 0.786274 0.042018 0.05033 0 0.003 0.3192 0.043917 0.052605 0 0.012 0.7448 1145.085 3716.49 0 0.004669 0.013069 0 0.179991 0.584181 0 0.100532 0.281366 00000 0.114448 0.320314 00000 0.27746 5.867721 0 0.010818 0.035112 0 Santa Clara 2022 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 8.419396 1059.849 33.67758 0.491737 0 1.236285 0.000328 0 9.7E‐05 0.003 0.05586 0.000356 0 0.000105 0.012 0.13034 2351.817 0 104.599 0.006789 0 0.178596 0.036386 0 0.091633 0.022728 0 0.768536 0.190076 1.35875 0.031079 0.049249 0.033164 0 0.84145 0.190076 1.35875 0.031079 0.049249 0.527722 0 8.852622 0.023273 0 0.001035 Santa Clara 2022 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 423.2358 46482.16 1692.943 0.803453 0 0 0.005651 0 0 0.008415 0.029326 0.005907 0 0 0.033661 0.068427 1481.178 0 0 0.077358 0 0 0.232821 0 0 0.001105 000000 0.078949 000000 0.131304 0 0 0.014002 0 0 Santa Clara 2022 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Natural Ga 104.0289 12325.91 416.1154 0.48934 0 0 0.003183 0 0 0.008475 0.029034 0.003327 0 0 0.033899 0.067746 2016.3 0 0 6.413607 0 0 0.411036 0 0 0.091638 000000 6.545556 000000 49.80397 00000 Source: EMFAC2017 (v1.0.3) Emission Rates
Region Type: CountyRegion: Santa ClaraCalendar Year: 2023Season: AnnualVehicle Classification: EMFAC2007 CategoriesUnits: miles/day for VMT, trips/day for Trips, g/mile for RUNEX, PMBW and PMTW, g/trip for STREX, HOTSOAK and RUNLOSS, g/vehicle/day for IDLEX, RESTLOSS and DIURNRegion Calendar Y Vehicle CatModel Yea Speed Fuel Population VMT Trips NOx_RUNENOx_IDLEXNOx_STREXPM2.5_RU PM2.5_IDL PM2.5_STRPM2.5_PMPM2.5_PMPM10_RUNPM10_IDLEPM10_STR PM10_PMTPM10_PMBCO2_RUNECO2_IDLEXCO2_STREXCH4_RUNECH4_IDLEXCH4_STREXN2O_RUNEN2O_IDLEXN2O_STREXROG_RUNEROG_IDLEXROG_STREXROG_HOTSROG_RUNLROG_REST ROG_DIUR TOG_RUNETOG_IDLEXTOG_STREXTOG_HOTSTOG_RUNLTOG_RESTLTOG_DIUR CO_RUNEXCO_IDLEX CO_STREX SOx_RUNE SOx_IDLEX SOx_STREX Santa Clara 2023 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 4.815448 553.4124 96.34748 3.178298 0 0.254165 0.001157 0 0.000623 0.005 0.02646 0.001259 0 0.000677 0.02 0.06174 1915.642 0 46.38676 0.084318 0 0.000462 0.130889 0 0.008571 0.409676 0 0.002416 0.109047 0.558691 0.026465 0.047808 0.597798 0 0.002645 0.109047 0.558691 0.026465 0.047808 27.8207 0 5.57125 0.018957 0 0.000459 Santa Clara 2023 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 8401.79 1034051 89180.29 2.696198 57.80539 2.360147 0.023887 0.026373 0 0.008879 0.026103 0.024967 0.027565 0 0.035514 0.060907 1411.729 11326.45 0 0.001106 0.214953 0 0.221904 1.78036 0 0.023817 4.627869 00000 0.027114 5.268477 00000 0.233741 67.52667 0 0.013337 0.107007 0 Santa Clara 2023 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Natural Ga 360.3246 14693.25 1405.266 1.588314 20.76108 0 0.004529 0.028055 0 0.009 0.02646 0.004734 0.029323 0 0.036 0.06174 3174.275 4018.428 0 3.456549 1.237751 0 0.647097 0.819183 0 0.148044 0.042416 00000 3.64007 1.291393 00000 10.76049 21.60789 0000 Santa Clara 2023 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 751359.6 26739811 3542534 0.034059 0 0.184615 0.001247 0 0.001682 0.002 0.01575 0.001356 0 0.001829 0.008 0.03675 252.091 0 53.87356 0.002048 0 0.050071 0.004113 0 0.025656 0.007696 0 0.221504 0.094205 0.212597 0.166193 0.187545 0.011228 0 0.242518 0.094205 0.212597 0.166193 0.187545 0.586148 0 2.259775 0.002495 0 0.000533 Santa Clara 2023 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 7591.987 280497.7 36090.42 0.058679 0 0 0.005598 0 0 0.002 0.01575 0.005851 0 0 0.008 0.03675 195.1926 0 0 0.000552 0 0 0.030682 0 0 0.011887 000000 0.013532 000000 0.188023 0 0 0.001845 0 0 Santa Clara 2023 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 28074.67 1034348 136585.9 000000 0.002 0.01575 0 0 0 0.008 0.03675 000000000000 0.004888 0 0.00456 0.017501 0 0 0 0.004888 0 0.00456 0.017501 000000 Santa Clara 2023 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 75517.84 2475367 350251 0.078745 0 0.232751 0.001604 0 0.002087 0.002 0.01575 0.001745 0 0.00227 0.008 0.03675 292.8794 0 62.80265 0.004214 0 0.063907 0.006493 0 0.02759 0.018087 0 0.309393 0.159698 0.584022 0.309209 0.384203 0.026384 0 0.338746 0.159698 0.584022 0.309209 0.384203 0.955745 0 2.366858 0.002898 0 0.000621 Santa Clara 2023 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 34.1777 620.5176 112.4335 1.098891 0 0 0.146297 0 0 0.002 0.01575 0.152912 0 0 0.008 0.03675 401.6268 0 0 0.008837 0 0 0.06313 0 0 0.190256 000000 0.216594 000000 1.080107 0 0 0.003797 0 0 Santa Clara 2023 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 788.4144 31182.48 3917.01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.002 0.01575 0 0 0 0.008 0.03675 000000000000 0.004888 0 0.00456 0.017501 0 0 0 0.004888 0 0.00456 0.017501 000000Santa Clara 2023 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 254167.5 8294772 1184412 0.06837 0 0.275999 0.001263 0 0.001639 0.002 0.01575 0.001374 0 0.001783 0.008 0.03675 316.8848 0 69.17216 0.003305 0 0.067695 0.00592 0 0.031692 0.013288 0 0.313842 0.123254 0.427158 0.276975 0.291298 0.019387 0 0.343617 0.123254 0.427158 0.276975 0.291298 0.800025 0 2.837237 0.003136 0 0.000685 Santa Clara 2023 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1802.688 66004.69 8781.203 0.037098 0 0 0.004581 0 0 0.002 0.01575 0.004788 0 0 0.008 0.03675 268.3329 0 0 0.000636 0 0 0.042178 0 0 0.01369 000000 0.015585 000000 0.124122 0 0 0.002537 0 0 Santa Clara 2023 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 3304.555 98384.64 16510.28 0 0 0000 0.002 0.01575 0 0 0 0.008 0.03675 000000000000 0.004888 0 0.00456 0.017501 0 0 0 0.004888 0 0.00456 0.017501 000000 Santa Clara 2023 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 16555.13 562142 246646.7 0.210457 0.037398 0.511224 0.002137 0 0.000377 0.002 0.03276 0.002324 0 0.00041 0.008 0.07644 994.5276 120.0678 18.82225 0.009676 0.118805 0.02387 0.012895 0.003089 0.040194 0.046707 0.428491 0.120584 0.120359 0.829144 0.024473 0.047994 0.068155 0.625253 0.132025 0.120359 0.829144 0.024473 0.047994 0.867722 3.754766 1.724 0.009842 0.001188 0.000186Santa Clara 2023 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 11594.64 435998.6 145846 1.400562 1.919948 0 0.019496 0.026734 0 0.003 0.03276 0.020378 0.027943 0 0.012 0.07644 535.8142 131.265 0 0.007088 0.005098 0 0.084223 0.020633 0 0.152594 0.10976 00000 0.173718 0.124954 00000 0.641529 0.909745 0 0.005065 0.001241 0Santa Clara 2023 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 2285.018 77947.41 34043.37 0.21093 0.036728 0.496392 0.002042 0 0.000334 0.002 0.03822 0.00222 0 0.000363 0.008 0.08918 1132.921 137.76 21.32176 0.007566 0.117557 0.022949 0.013529 0.00301 0.038884 0.03359 0.420989 0.114958 0.114086 0.752468 0.022171 0.043386 0.049014 0.614306 0.125864 0.114086 0.752468 0.022171 0.043386 0.620201 3.758932 1.718516 0.011211 0.001363 0.000211 Santa Clara 2023 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4660.728 171541.4 58626.09 1.17888 1.93121 0 0.020832 0.02707 0 0.003 0.03822 0.021774 0.028294 0 0.012 0.08918 603.2432 210.8377 0 0.00683 0.005098 0 0.094821 0.033141 0 0.147052 0.10976 00000 0.167409 0.124954 00000 0.621451 0.909745 0 0.005703 0.001993 0 Santa Clara 2023 MCY Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 33683.49 242470.7 67366.97 1.148719 0 0.270672 0.00184 0 0.002859 0.001 0.00504 0.001969 0 0.003039 0.004 0.01176 210.1672 0 61.03922 0.326994 0 0.255241 0.066143 0 0.01536 2.208057 0 1.941958 0.689105 1.969445 0.985054 1.809555 2.736079 0 2.11358 0.689105 1.969445 0.985054 1.809555 18.86893 0 9.034026 0.00208 0 0.000604 Santa Clara 2023 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 154431.4 4896063 714241.1 0.085683 0 0.336488 0.001332 0 0.001823 0.002 0.01575 0.001448 0 0.001982 0.008 0.03675 383.1839 0 84.08131 0.004049 0 0.08064 0.007039 0 0.034344 0.016817 0 0.396565 0.140569 0.457303 0.323766 0.336538 0.024505 0 0.434185 0.140569 0.457303 0.323766 0.336538 0.891357 0 3.240031 0.003792 0 0.000832 Santa Clara 2023 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4004.429 142223.9 19410.39 0.034292 0 0 0.003829 0 0 0.002 0.01575 0.004002 0 0 0.008 0.03675 350.448 0 0 0.000445 0 0 0.055086 0 0 0.009578 000000 0.010904 000000 0.180483 0 0 0.003313 0 0 Santa Clara 2023 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 1532.638 48234.63 7794.674 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.002 0.01575 0 0 0 0.008 0.03675 000000000000 0.004888 0 0.00456 0.017501 0 0 0 0.004888 0 0.00456 0.017501 000000Santa Clara 2023 MH Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 2857.04 26157.03 285.8182 0.361451 0 0.336127 0.001555 0 0.000345 0.003 0.05586 0.001691 0 0.000375 0.012 0.13034 1731.827 0 25.56622 0.013045 0 0.031746 0.02323 0 0.035777 0.05596 0 0.132332 0.081683 1.97006 0.033844 0.096831 0.081657 0 0.144887 0.081683 1.97006 0.033844 0.096831 1.390474 0 2.91812 0.017138 0 0.000253 Santa Clara 2023 MH Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1053.778 9907.819 105.3778 4.0099 0 0 0.079211 0 0 0.004 0.05586 0.082793 0 0 0.016 0.13034 1007.175 0 0 0.004873 0 0 0.158314 0 0 0.104917 000000 0.119441 000000 0.367033 0 0 0.009521 0 0 Santa Clara 2023 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1507.68 78317.15 30165.67 0.385258 0.088623 0.367592 0.001293 0 0.000446 0.003 0.05586 0.001406 0 0.000485 0.012 0.13034 1697.438 526.34 38.16999 0.011942 0.266499 0.038604 0.019927 0.007724 0.029367 0.057622 1.014767 0.206928 0.080059 0.455824 0.017154 0.033931 0.084081 1.480746 0.22656 0.080059 0.455824 0.017154 0.033931 1.316681 15.14023 4.623501 0.016798 0.005209 0.000378 Santa Clara 2023 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 9262.822 558718.8 92583.75 1.59247 5.703996 2.12952 0.007398 0.005414 0 0.003 0.05586 0.007733 0.005658 0 0.012 0.13034 1010.629 886.4048 0 0.000529 0.003602 0 0.158857 0.13933 0 0.011387 0.077551 00000 0.012963 0.088286 00000 0.113094 2.687765 0 0.009548 0.008374 0 Santa Clara 2023 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 503.4572 23697.77 10073.17 0.401971 0.065148 0.321785 0.000992 0 0.000219 0.003 0.05586 0.001079 0 0.000239 0.012 0.13034 1743.614 374.6133 26.08015 0.011771 0.201157 0.029667 0.020963 0.005691 0.026276 0.05538 0.74759 0.152323 0.027045 0.299878 0.01619 0.03654 0.080811 1.090882 0.166775 0.027045 0.299878 0.01619 0.03654 1.211154 5.782545 3.193149 0.017254 0.003707 0.000258 Santa Clara 2023 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 753.4001 53354.33 6899.877 1.902854 8.28017 2.210652 0.009253 0.002588 0 0.003 0.05586 0.009671 0.002705 0 0.012 0.13034 1163.247 1820.683 0 0.000567 0.024706 0 0.182846 0.286186 0 0.012205 0.531913 00000 0.013895 0.605542 00000 0.141032 9.053135 0 0.01099 0.017201 0Santa Clara 2023 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 263.5229 11968.77 1054.092 0.420713 0.924728 0.578334 0.001201 0 0.000506 0.002 0.3192 0.001307 0 0.00055 0.008 0.7448 859.0893 2565.057 48.16666 0.011122 2.441451 0.057864 0.023879 0.088232 0.054355 0.054742 10.61517 0.330464 0.063152 0.426847 0.010977 0.026004 0.07988 15.48964 0.361817 0.063152 0.426847 0.010977 0.026004 1.167899 82.08092 8.465591 0.008501 0.025383 0.000477 Santa Clara 2023 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1013.614 31894.7 11696.96 6.544978 44.13946 0.832887 0.040645 0.046993 0 0.003 0.3192 0.042483 0.049118 0 0.012 0.7448 1136.76 3703.284 0 0.004568 0.012858 0 0.178683 0.582105 0 0.098352 0.27682 00000 0.111967 0.315138 00000 0.275014 6.038953 0 0.01074 0.034987 0 Santa Clara 2023 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 8.423223 1060.331 33.69289 0.150806 0 0.638272 0.002209 0 0.000888 0.003 0.05586 0.002402 0 0.000966 0.012 0.13034 1956.542 0 88.49758 0.007038 0 0.09018 0.015696 0 0.066738 0.022728 0 0.374288 0.008476 0.037646 0.001991 0.00493 0.033164 0 0.409798 0.008476 0.037646 0.001991 0.00493 0.258128 0 8.852622 0.019362 0 0.000876 Santa Clara 2023 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 430.5287 46874.38 1722.115 0.802545 0 0 0.005646 0 0 0.008399 0.029403 0.005901 0 0 0.033598 0.068607 1480.062 0 0 0.077245 0 0 0.232645 0 0 0.001104 000000 0.078834 000000 0.131094 0 0 0.013992 0 0 Santa Clara 2023 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Natural Ga 96.97562 11960.41 387.9025 0.491564 0 0 0.003197 0 0 0.008538 0.028723 0.003341 0 0 0.034153 0.06702 2024.074 0 0 6.451045 0 0 0.412621 0 0 0.092173 000000 6.583765 000000 50.12464 00000 Source: EMFAC2017 (v1.0.3) Emission Rates
Region Type: CountyRegion: Santa ClaraCalendar Year: 2030Season: AnnualVehicle Classification: EMFAC2007 CategoriesUnits: miles/day for VMT, trips/day for Trips, g/mile for RUNEX, PMBW and PMTW, g/trip for STREX, HOTSOAK and RUNLOSS, g/vehicle/day for IDLEX, RESTLOSS and DIURNRegion Calendar Y Vehicle CatModel Yea Speed Fuel Population VMT Trips NOx_RUNENOx_IDLEXNOx_STREXPM2.5_RU PM2.5_IDL PM2.5_STRPM2.5_PMPM2.5_PMPM10_RUNPM10_IDLEPM10_STR PM10_PMTPM10_PMBCO2_RUNECO2_IDLEXCO2_STREXCH4_RUNECH4_IDLEXCH4_STREXN2O_RUNEN2O_IDLEXN2O_STREXROG_RUNEROG_IDLEXROG_STREXROG_HOTSROG_RUNLROG_REST ROG_DIUR TOG_RUNETOG_IDLEXTOG_STREXTOG_HOTSTOG_RUNLTOG_RESTLTOG_DIUR CO_RUNEXCO_IDLEX CO_STREX SOx_RUNE SOx_IDLEX SOx_STREX Santa Clara 2030 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 6.644908 846.0095 132.9513 2.895279 0 0.044486 0.001084 0 0.000414 0.005 0.02646 0.001179 0 0.00045 0.02 0.06174 1677.599 0 40.07141 0.06849 0 0.000337 0.127319 0 0.001575 0.302922 0 0.001761 0.044849 0.220711 0.012382 0.020645 0.442024 0 0.001928 0.044849 0.220711 0.012382 0.020645 28.21474 0 5.186707 0.016601 0 0.000397 Santa Clara 2030 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 9431.66 1177485 101453.9 2.539781 56.05241 2.353151 0.023044 0.021785 0 0.008907 0.026186 0.024086 0.02277 0 0.035627 0.061101 1202.821 10016.29 0 0.001063 0.214358 0 0.189067 1.574421 0 0.022896 4.615071 00000 0.026066 5.253907 00000 0.238872 67.80499 0 0.011364 0.094629 0 Santa Clara 2030 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Natural Ga 400.4237 16329.01 1561.653 0.881174 19.09434 0 0.003462 0.015749 0 0.009 0.02646 0.003619 0.016461 0 0.036 0.06174 2899.524 3653.632 0 3.225286 1.19295 0 0.591087 0.744817 0 0.090199 0.028054 00000 3.341906 1.230036 00000 11.01311 21.88788 0000 Santa Clara 2030 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 869969.1 28403709 4092414 0.020358 0 0.132956 0.000879 0 0.001249 0.002 0.01575 0.000956 0 0.001359 0.008 0.03675 211.6944 0 44.94162 0.001023 0 0.030835 0.003085 0 0.020493 0.003388 0 0.12606 0.065117 0.180811 0.11416 0.123291 0.004944 0 0.13802 0.065117 0.180811 0.11416 0.123291 0.43107 0 1.801842 0.002095 0 0.000445 Santa Clara 2030 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 10023.63 337674.2 47693.27 0.01676 0 0 0.001829 0 0 0.002 0.01575 0.001912 0 0 0.008 0.03675 166.1368 0 0 0.000273 0 0 0.026114 0 0 0.005885 000000 0.006699 000000 0.146966 0 0 0.001571 0 0 Santa Clara 2030 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 46172.96 1625146 221619.4 000000 0.002 0.01575 0 0 0 0.008 0.03675 000000000000 0.004888 0 0.00456 0.017501 0 0 0 0.004888 0 0.00456 0.017501 000000 Santa Clara 2030 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 88972.38 2670256 412660.2 0.034308 0 0.154254 0.000998 0 0.001379 0.002 0.01575 0.001085 0 0.001499 0.008 0.03675 248.8135 0 52.89319 0.001722 0 0.036164 0.003879 0 0.021779 0.00667 0 0.15755 0.095382 0.371981 0.194977 0.219194 0.009733 0 0.172497 0.095382 0.371981 0.194977 0.219194 0.548445 0 1.868724 0.002462 0 0.000523Santa Clara 2030 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 12.41764 352.1646 54.72798 0.189506 0 0 0.017188 0 0 0.002 0.01575 0.017965 0 0 0.008 0.03675 322.0531 0 0 0.001569 0 0 0.050622 0 0 0.033785 000000 0.038462 000000 0.286183 0 0 0.003045 0 0 Santa Clara 2030 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 2180.044 81488.93 10672.84 0 0 0000 0.002 0.01575 0 0 0 0.008 0.03675 000000000000 0.004888 0 0.00456 0.017501 0 0 0 0.004888 0 0.00456 0.017501 000000 Santa Clara 2030 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 281546.9 8446247 1307139 0.035247 0 0.174198 0.000925 0 0.001282 0.002 0.01575 0.001006 0 0.001394 0.008 0.03675 256.344 0 55.96845 0.00178 0 0.043514 0.003847 0 0.023481 0.006634 0 0.189401 0.09208 0.348635 0.233116 0.234964 0.00968 0 0.20737 0.09208 0.348635 0.233116 0.234964 0.568541 0 2.344012 0.002537 0 0.000554Santa Clara 2030 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 2576.298 81354.46 12261.45 0.02908 0 0 0.003937 0 0 0.002 0.01575 0.004115 0 0 0.008 0.03675 226.4921 0 0 0.000595 0 0 0.035601 0 0 0.01282 000000 0.014595 000000 0.129762 0 0 0.002141 0 0 Santa Clara 2030 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 8320.478 213767.2 40645.17 0 0 0000 0.002 0.01575 0 0 0 0.008 0.03675 000000000000 0.004888 0 0.00456 0.017501 0 0 0 0.004888 0 0.00456 0.017501 000000 Santa Clara 2030 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 17444.25 563109.1 259893.3 0.098098 0.030587 0.387515 0.002081 0 0.000333 0.002 0.03276 0.002264 0 0.000362 0.008 0.07644 897.5407 110.5325 17.36665 0.004317 0.101968 0.015524 0.006844 0.002802 0.033538 0.018245 0.350811 0.075233 0.094381 0.739315 0.019801 0.035959 0.026623 0.511903 0.082371 0.094381 0.739315 0.019801 0.035959 0.368714 3.768698 1.531971 0.008882 0.001094 0.000172Santa Clara 2030 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 14887.61 510107.2 187267.4 0.522674 1.343027 0 0.011738 0.026289 0 0.003 0.03276 0.012269 0.027477 0 0.012 0.07644 478.8761 118.3357 0 0.006165 0.005098 0 0.075273 0.018601 0 0.13273 0.10976 00000 0.151104 0.124954 00000 0.579164 0.909745 0 0.004527 0.001119 0 Santa Clara 2030 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 2535.293 81915.35 37772.09 0.091162 0.030032 0.379653 0.001975 0 0.000297 0.002 0.03822 0.002148 0 0.000323 0.008 0.08918 1021.816 126.3902 19.57212 0.00327 0.10112 0.014626 0.00699 0.00275 0.032936 0.012455 0.344716 0.06918 0.074032 0.436992 0.016932 0.02908 0.018175 0.503009 0.075743 0.074032 0.436992 0.016932 0.02908 0.249204 3.775612 1.472175 0.010112 0.001251 0.000194 Santa Clara 2030 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 6126.051 201454.9 77058.01 0.503536 1.378592 0 0.017789 0.026933 0 0.003 0.03822 0.018593 0.028151 0 0.012 0.08918 540.7481 191.3797 0 0.006181 0.005098 0 0.084998 0.030082 0 0.133066 0.10976 00000 0.151486 0.124954 00000 0.586662 0.909745 0 0.005112 0.001809 0 Santa Clara 2030 MCY Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 38839.87 253703.2 77679.74 1.137409 0 0.270173 0.001994 0 0.002676 0.001 0.00504 0.002138 0 0.002862 0.004 0.01176 209.7572 0 59.22586 0.319087 0 0.24786 0.065566 0 0.015364 2.128511 0 1.877593 0.631299 1.487321 0.946881 1.786807 2.666273 0 2.04481 0.631299 1.487321 0.946881 1.786807 17.60732 0 9.199577 0.002076 0 0.000586 Santa Clara 2030 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 173606 5113918 803848 0.03715 0 0.190209 0.00093 0 0.001318 0.002 0.01575 0.001012 0 0.001433 0.008 0.03675 309.7804 0 67.68816 0.001872 0 0.04685 0.004005 0 0.024192 0.007071 0 0.21174 0.103941 0.361114 0.278651 0.281249 0.010317 0 0.231829 0.103941 0.361114 0.278651 0.281249 0.571385 0 2.441594 0.003066 0 0.00067 Santa Clara 2030 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 5652.323 175214.3 26820.46 0.016338 0 0 0.001999 0 0 0.002 0.01575 0.00209 0 0 0.008 0.03675 295.1303 0 0 0.000296 0 0 0.04639 0 0 0.006382 000000 0.007265 000000 0.160558 0 0 0.00279 0 0 Santa Clara 2030 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 5412.776 143464.5 26723.4 000000 0.002 0.01575 0 0 0 0.008 0.03675 000000000000 0.004888 0 0.00456 0.017501 0 0 0 0.004888 0 0.00456 0.017501 000000 Santa Clara 2030 MH Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 2781.183 26082.35 278.2296 0.161957 0 0.344848 0.001294 0 0.000284 0.003 0.05586 0.001408 0 0.000309 0.012 0.13034 1534.746 0 22.64387 0.005412 0 0.028477 0.014768 0 0.039513 0.01789 0 0.108156 0.041368 0.780207 0.020421 0.050661 0.026105 0 0.118417 0.041368 0.780207 0.020421 0.050661 0.321425 0 2.382509 0.015188 0 0.000224 Santa Clara 2030 MH Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1271.562 11026.54 127.1562 3.194675 0 0 0.048471 0 0 0.004 0.05586 0.050662 0 0 0.016 0.13034 913.8987 0 0 0.004117 0 0 0.143652 0 0 0.088635 000000 0.100905 000000 0.288665 0 0 0.00864 0 0 Santa Clara 2030 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1942.274 96462.8 38861.02 0.137179 0.089333 0.328382 0.001276 0 0.000397 0.003 0.05586 0.001388 0 0.000432 0.012 0.13034 1512.526 477.0555 33.02741 0.004329 0.277482 0.032379 0.010371 0.008413 0.029895 0.018098 1.025296 0.159937 0.053505 0.276198 0.013009 0.02236 0.026409 1.49611 0.175111 0.053505 0.276198 0.013009 0.02236 0.365535 15.26266 3.370143 0.014968 0.004721 0.000327 Santa Clara 2030 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 11245.42 599136.6 111242.1 1.636194 4.546441 2.164606 0.007568 0.002068 0 0.003 0.05586 0.00791 0.002162 0 0.012 0.13034 909.8747 786.5238 0 0.000503 0.003226 0 0.14302 0.123631 0 0.010837 0.069445 00000 0.012337 0.079058 00000 0.11784 2.775159 0 0.008596 0.007431 0 Santa Clara 2030 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 521.2442 22324.56 10429.05 0.201397 0.065222 0.308429 0.001191 0 0.000252 0.003 0.05586 0.001295 0 0.000274 0.012 0.13034 1542.791 344.1269 23.61734 0.005871 0.202191 0.026706 0.012891 0.005853 0.026143 0.025703 0.748687 0.134449 0.027407 0.319238 0.017082 0.037276 0.037506 1.092483 0.147204 0.027407 0.319238 0.017082 0.037276 0.529537 5.789149 2.766701 0.015267 0.003405 0.000234Santa Clara 2030 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 845.8557 51263.29 7867.551 1.991442 9.302951 2.216948 0.010285 0.002947 0 0.003 0.05586 0.01075 0.003081 0 0.012 0.13034 1066.293 1893.973 0 0.000596 0.028932 0 0.167606 0.297706 0 0.012842 0.6229 00000 0.01462 0.709124 00000 0.14672 10.36618 0 0.010074 0.017893 0 Santa Clara 2030 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 362.3014 15198.78 1449.205 0.285961 0.92653 0.616868 0.001215 0 0.000547 0.002 0.3192 0.001322 0 0.000595 0.008 0.7448 803.9675 2414.339 44.56576 0.00626 2.435971 0.055823 0.018735 0.089714 0.057177 0.030067 10.64152 0.317303 0.073145 0.474779 0.014584 0.030637 0.043873 15.52808 0.347407 0.073145 0.474779 0.014584 0.030637 0.649967 82.24088 7.563743 0.007956 0.023892 0.000441 Santa Clara 2030 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 980.5629 30722.11 11315.56 4.472027 34.94152 1.257143 0.029756 0.025511 0 0.003 0.3192 0.031102 0.026664 0 0.012 0.7448 1052.894 3501.127 0 0.003486 0.012263 0 0.1655 0.550328 0 0.075046 0.264022 00000 0.085434 0.300569 00000 0.238791 7.720739 0 0.009947 0.033077 0 Santa Clara 2030 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 8.45001 1063.703 33.80004 0.336697 0 0.964336 0.002209 0 0.000888 0.003 0.05586 0.002402 0 0.000966 0.012 0.13034 1956.157 0 89.19596 0.006892 0 0.139066 0.027885 0 0.079916 0.022728 0 0.589249 0.05182 0.313542 0.009109 0.015639 0.033164 0 0.645153 0.05182 0.313542 0.009109 0.015639 0.405122 0 8.852622 0.019358 0 0.000883 Santa Clara 2030 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 376.8943 42036.62 1507.577 0.804174 0 0 0.005656 0 0 0.008428 0.029265 0.005912 0 0 0.03371 0.068284 1523.264 0 0 0.077448 0 0 0.239436 0 0 0.001107 000000 0.079041 000000 0.131472 0 0 0.0144 0 0 Santa Clara 2030 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Natural Ga 152.2876 16985.28 609.1502 0.487691 0 0 0.003174 0 0 0.008428 0.029265 0.003317 0 0 0.03371 0.068284 2010.534 0 0 6.385838 0 0 0.40986 0 0 0.091241 000000 6.517216 000000 49.56612 00000 Attachment 4: Construction Emissions and Health Risk Calculations The Estuary @ Terra, San Jose CA
DPM Emissions and Modeling Emission Rates - Unmitigated DPM
Modeled Emission
Construction DPM Area DPM Emissions Area Rate
Year Activity (ton/year) Source (lb/yr) (lb/hr) (g/s) (m2 ) (g/s/m2)
2021 Construction 0.0238 CON_DPM 47.5 0.01447 1.82E-03 13336 1.37E-07 2022 Construction 0.0043 CON_DPM 8.6 0.00263 3.31E-04 13336 2.48E-08 Total 0.0281 56.1 0.0171 0.0022
Construction Hours
hr/day = 9 (7am - 4pm)
days/yr = 365
hours/year = 3285
The Estuary @ Terra, San Jose CA
PM2.5 Fugitive Dust Emissions for Modeling - Unmitigated PM2.5
Modeled Emission
Construction Area PM2.5 Emissions Area Rate
Year Activity Source (ton/year) (lb/yr) (lb/hr) (g/s) (m2 ) g/s/m2
2021 Construction CON_FUG 0.0175 35.0 0.01067 1.34E-03 13,336.0 1.01E-07 2022 Construction CON_FUG 0.0006 1.1 0.00035 4.41E-05 13,336.0 3.31E-09 Total 0.0181 36.2 0.0110 0.0014
Construction Hours
hr/day = 9 (7am - 4pm)
days/yr = 365
hours/year = 3285
The Estuary @ Terra, San Jose, CA - Construction Health Impact Summary Maximum Impacts at MEI Location - Without Mitigation
Maximum Concentrations Maximum
Exhaust Fugitive Cancer Risk Hazard Annual PM2.5
Emissions PM10/DPM PM2.5 (per million) Index Concentration Year (μg/m3
) (μg/m3) Infant/Child (-) (μg/m3)
2021 0.0014 0.0011 0.25 0.0003 0.003
2022 0.0003 0.00004 0.04 0.0001 0.0003
Total -- 0.3 --
Maximum 0.0014 0.0011 - 0.0003 0.003
Maximum Impacts at Mayne Elementary School
Unmitigated Emissions
Maximum Concentrations Maximum
Exhaust Fugitive Child Hazard Annual PM2.5
Construction PM2.5/DPM PM2.5 Cancer Risk Index Concentration Year (μg/m3
) (μg/m3) (per million) (-) (μg/m3)
2021 0.0015 0.0011 0.09 0.0003 0.003
2022 0.0003 0.00004 0.02 0.0001 0.0003
Total -- 0.1 --
Maximum 0.0015 0.0011 - 0.0003 0.003
The Estuary @ Terra, San Jose, CA - Construction Impacts - Without Mitigation Maximum DPM Cancer Risk and PM2.5 Calculations From Construction Impacts at Off-Site MEI Location - 1.5 meter receptor height Cancer Risk (per million) =CPF x Inhalation Dose x ASF x ED/AT x FAH x 1.0E6 Where: CPF = Cancer potency factor (mg/kg-day)-1
ASF = Age sensitivity factor for specified age group
ED = Exposure duration (years)
AT = Averaging time for lifetime cancer risk (years)
FAH = Fraction of time spent at home (unitless)
Inhalation Dose = Cair x DBR x A x (EF/365) x 10-6
Where: Cair = concentration in air (μg/m3)
DBR = daily breathing rate (L/kg body weight-day)
A = Inhalation absorption factor
EF = Exposure frequency (days/year)
10-6 = Conversion factor
Values
Infant/Child Adult
Age --> 3rd Trimester 0 - 2 2 - 16 16 - 30
Parameter
ASF = 10 10 3 1
CPF = 1.10E+00 1.10E+00 1.10E+00 1.10E+00
DBR* = 361 1090 572 261
A = 1 1 1 1
EF = 350 350 350 350
AT = 70 70 70 70
FAH = 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.73
* 95th percentile breathing rates for infants and 80th percentile for children and adults Construction Cancer Risk by Year - Maximum Impact Receptor Location Infant/Child - Exposure Information Infant/Child Adult - Exposure Information Adult Exposure Age Cancer Modeled Age Cancer Maximum
Exposure Duration DPM Conc (ug/m3) Sensitivity Risk DPM Conc (ug/m3) Sensitivity Risk Hazard Fugitive Total Year (years) Age Year Annual Factor (per million) Year Annual Factor (per million) Index PM2.5 PM2.5 0 0.25 -0.25 - 0* 2021 0.0014 10 0.02 2021 0.0014 - -
1 1 0 - 1 2021 0.0014 10 0.23 2021 0.0014 1 0.004 0.0003 0.0011 0.0025 2 1 1 - 2 2022 0.0003 10 0.04 2022 0.0003 1 0.001 0.0001 0.00004 0.0003 3 1 2 - 3 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
4 1 3 - 4 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
5 1 4 - 5 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
6 1 5 - 6 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
7 1 6 - 7 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
8 1 7 - 8 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
9 1 8 - 9 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
10 1 9 - 10 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
11 1 10 - 11 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
12 1 11 - 12 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
13 1 12 - 13 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
14 1 13 - 14 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
15 1 14 - 15 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
16 1 15 - 16 0.0000 3 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
17 1 16-17 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
18 1 17-18 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
19 1 18-19 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
20 1 19-20 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
21 1 20-21 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
22 1 21-22 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
23 1 22-23 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
24 1 23-24 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
25 1 24-25 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
26 1 25-26 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
27 1 26-27 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
28 1 27-28 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
29 1 28-29 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
30 1 29-30 0.0000 1 0.00 0.0000 1 0.00
Total Increased Cancer Risk 0.3 0.005
* Third trimester of pregnancy

The Estuary @ Terra, San Jose, CA - Construction Impacts - Without Mitigation Maximum DPM Cancer Risk and PM2.5 Calculations From Construction Impacts at Mayne Elementary School (3+ years old) - 1.0 meters - Child Exposure Student Cancer Risk (per million) = CPF x Inhalation Dose x ASF x ED/AT x 1.0E6 Where: CPF = Cancer potency factor (mg/kg-day)-1
ASF = Age sensitivity factor for specified age group
ED = Exposure duration (years)
AT = Averaging time for lifetime cancer risk (years)
Inhalation Dose = Cair x SAF x 8-Hr BR x A x (EF/365) x 10-6 Where: Cair = concentration in air (μg/m3)
SAF = Student Adjustment Factor (unitless)
= (24 hrs/9 hrs) x (7 days/5 days) = 3.73
8-Hr BR = Eight-hour breathing rate (L/kg body weight-per 8 hrs) A = Inhalation absorption factor
EF = Exposure frequency (days/year)
10-6 = Conversion factor
Values
Infant School Child Adult
Age --> 0 - <2 2 - <16 16 - 30
Parameter
ASF = 10 3 1
CPF = 1.10E+00 1.10E+00 1.10E+00
8-Hr BR* = 1200 520 240
A = 1 1 1
EF = 250 250 250
AT = 70 70 70
SAF = 1.00 3.73 1.00
* 95th percentile 8-hr breathing rates for moderate intensity activities Construction Cancer Risk by Year - Maximum Impact Receptor Location Child - Exposure Information Child
Exposure Age* Cancer
Exposure Duration DPM Conc (ug/m3) Sensitivity Risk Hazard Fugitive Total Year (years) Age Year Annual Factor (per million) Index PM2.5 PM2.5 1 1 3 -4 2021 0.0015 3 0.1 0.0003 0.0011 0.0026
2 1 4 - 5 2022 0.0003 3 0.02 0.0001 0.00004 0.0003
Total Increased Cancer Risk 0.1
* Children assumed to be 3 years of age or older
Maximum
Attachment 5: Community Risk Screening and Calculations Date of Request 9/24/2020
Contact Name Casey DivineAffiliation Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc.Phone 707‐794‐0400 x103Email [email protected]
Project Name The Estuary @ TerraAddress
Across from 5030 N 1st Street
City San JoseCounty Santa ClaraType (residential, commercial, mixed use, industrial, etc.) HotelProject Size (# of units or building square feet) 215 rooms Table A: Requester Contact Information
Comments:

Risk & Hazard Stationary Source Inquiry FormThis form is required when users request stationary source data from BAAQMDThis form is to be used with the BAAQMD's Google Earth stationary source screening tables.

Click here for guidance on coducting risk & hazard screening, including roadways & freeways, refer to the District's Risk & Hazard Analysis flow chart.

Click here for District's Recommended Methods for Screening and Modeling Local Risks and Hazards document.

For Air District assistance, the following steps must be completed:

1. Complete all the contact and project information requested in . Incomplete forms will not be processed. Please include a project site map.2. Download and install the free program Google Earth, http://www.google.com/earth/download/ge/, and then download the county specific Google Earth stationary source application files from the District's website, http://www.baaqmd.gov/Divisions/Planning‐and‐Research/CEQA‐GUIDELINES/Tools‐and‐Methodology.aspx. The small points on the map represent stationary sources permitted by the District (Map A on right). These permitted sources include diesel back‐up generators, gas stations, dry cleaners, boilers, printers, auto spray booths, etc. Click on a point to view the source's Information Table, including the name, location, and preliminary estimated cancer risk, hazard index, and PM2.5 concentration.

3. Find the project site in Google Earth by inputting the site's address in the Google Earth search box.4. Identify stationary sources within at least a 1000ft radius of project site. Verify that the location of the source on the map matches with the source's address in the Information Table, by using the Google Earth address search box to confirm the source's address location. Please report any mapping errors to the District.5. List the stationary source information in blue section only.6. Note that a small percentage of the stationary sources have Health Risk Screening Assessment (HRSA) data INSTEAD of screening level data. These sources will be noted by an asterisk next to the Plant Name (Map B on right). If HRSA values are presented, these values have already been modeled and cannot be adjusted further.7. Email this completed form to District staff. District staff will provide the most recent risk, hazard, and PM2.5 data that are available for the source(s). If this information or data are not available, source emissions data will be provided. Staff will respond to inquiries within three weeks.

Note that a public records request received for the same stationary source information will cancel the processing of your SSIF request.

Submit forms, maps, and questions to Areana Flores at 415‐749‐4616, or [email protected] Table A: Requester Contact Information
Table B
Table A
Construction MEI
Distance from
Receptor (feet) or
MEI1 Plant No. Facility Name Address Cancer Risk2
Hazard
Risk2 PM2.52 Source No.3 Type of Source4 Fuel Code5 Status/Comments Distance
Adjustment
Multiplier
Adjusted
Cancer Risk
Estimate
Adjusted
Hazard
Risk
Adjusted
PM2.5
1000 23434 South Bay Development, LLC 4353 N 1st Street 0.31 ‐‐ ‐‐ Generators 2018 Dataset 0.04 0.01 #VALUE! #VALUE! 340 20630 Verizon Wireless‐Alviso 4701 N 1st Street 1.20 ‐‐ ‐‐ Generators 2018 Dataset 0.22 0.3 #VALUE! #VALUE!Footnotes:

1. Maximally exposed individual
c. BAAQMD Reg 11 Rule 16 required that all co‐residential (sharing a wall, floor, ceiling or is in the same building as a residential unit) dry cleaners cease use of perc on July 1, 2010.

Date last updated: 03/13/2018
g. This spray booth is considered to be insignificant.

4. Permitted sources include diesel back‐up generators, gas stations, dry cleaners, boilers, printers, auto spray booths, etc.11. Further information about common sources:
a. Sources that only include diesel internal combustion engines can be adjusted using the BAAQMD's Diesel Multiplier worksheet. b. The risk from natural gas boilers used for space heating when <25 MM BTU/hr would have an estimated cancer risk of one in a million or less, and a chronic hazard index of Therefore, there is no cancer risk, hazard or PM2.5 concentrations from co‐residential dry cleaning businesses in the BAAQMD. d. Non co‐residential dry cleaners must phase out use of perc by Jan. 1, 2023. Therefore, the risk from these dry cleaners does not need to be factored in over a 70‐year period, but instead e. Gas stations can be adjusted using BAAQMD's Gas Station Distance Mulitplier worksheet.

6. If a Health Risk Screening Assessment (HRSA) was completed for the source, the application number will be listed here.7. The date that the HRSA was completed.8. Engineer who completed the HRSA. For District purposes only.9. All HRSA completed before 1/5/2010 need to be multiplied by an age sensitivity factor of 1.7.10. The HRSA "Chronic Health" number represents the Hazard Index.5. Fuel codes: 98 = diesel, 189 = Natural Gas.2. These Cancer Risk, Hazard Index, and PM2.5 columns represent the values in the Google Earth Plant Information Table.3. Each plant may have multiple permits and sources. f. Unless otherwise noted, exempt sources are considered insignificant. See BAAQMD Reg 2 Rule 1 for a list of exempt sources.

Table B: Google Earth data

!"#$

%$&
'"("#!
)$* #
+
,-./.-/0-/12
-,,34
1 5 6
78
9

!!"#$ % & ! '#()( *+*+

!!"#$ % & ! '#()
, -./

0011234
(55 6!7#8
#9:&6;<!=
>>? 5@5#*#('!#!
! <#A6'?+
, B2C3
DE
F
0GHIJKL3C
(@(5 <! #?&
M5(MM N<
!6
'( *6!O#P7#'! !"#
'Q# <"#7 R
"# ; %!'#S
6#!7'#'6
%'#T6&"#U#V;%!"#!6#U#'U'! <! &&
#&6T
#T7<#' !#';% S %#W &!7#X 'Q#%
< <Y#+''''<!'#
#%6<"%!"M#
P7#'%
< <Y#&:&# ;# '#<6!#
%6<""#S6
#: & ! <Y#'<' ! :#& <"#''#'%7# '#'%766&'=#'< 6
#%<!
'=#"
#%
'=# <"#7 &!7#S % & ! 'M#
Z#?6;

Y7!#()#8
#+
#+
#[ & !
#\ < Y<!#9 '!
%!
2169-G East Francisco Blvd., San Rafael, CA 94901 (415) 454-8868 tel [email protected] www.wra-ca.com Biological Resources Assessment

ALVISO HOTEL

SAN JOSE, SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Prepared For:

David J. Powers & Associates, Inc.
1871 The Alameda, Suite 200
San Jose, California 95126
Contact: Desiree Dei Rossi
[email protected]
WRA Contact:

Bianca Clarke
[email protected]
Date:

February 2020
WRA Project #:
29259
i
List of Preparers
Justin Semion – Principal-in-charge
Bianca Clarke – Project Manager
Scott Batiuk – Plant Biologist
Rei Scampavia – Biologist
Brian Kearns – Wildlife Biologist
Sundaran Gillespie – GIS Analysist
ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLES.......................................................................................................................iii LIST OF APPENDICES .............................................................................................................iii LIST OF ACRONYMS................................................................................................................iv

1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................. 1

2.0 REGULATORY BACKGROUND......................................................................................... 1

2.1 Sensitive Biological Communities .............................................................................. 1

2.1.1 Waters of the United States ........................................................................... 1

2.1.2 Waters of the State........................................................................................ 2

2.1.3 San Francisco Bay and Shoreline .................................................................. 2

2.1.3 Streams, Lakes, and Riparian Habitat............................................................. 2

2.1.4 Essential Fish Habitat .................................................................................... 3

2.1.5 Other Sensitive Biological Communities ........................................................ 3

2.1.6 Relevant Local Policies, Ordinances, and Regulations .................................. 3 City of San Jose Ordinances and Policies................................................... 3 Santa Clara Valley Habitat Plan.................................................................. 4

2.2 Special-Status Species .............................................................................................. 4

3.0 METHODS.......................................................................................................................... 5

3.1 Biological Communities ........................................................................................... 6

3.1.1 Non-sensitive Biological Communities ........................................................... 6

3.1.2 Sensitive Biological Communities .................................................................. 6

3.2 Special-Status Species .............................................................................................. 7

3.2.1 Literature Review........................................................................................... 7

3.2.2 Site Assessment............................................................................................ 7

4.0 RESULTS ........................................................................................................................... 8

4.1 Project Area Description ............................................................................................ 8

4.2 Soils........................................................................................................................... 9

4.3 Biological Communities.............................................................................................. 9

4.3.1 Non-Sensitive Biological Communities......................................................... 10

4.3.2 Sensitive Aquatic Communities.................................................................... 10

4.3 Special-Status Species .............................................................................................11

4.3.1 Special-Status Plant Species....................................................................... 11

4.3.2 Special-Status Wildlife ................................................................................. 12

4.3.3 Listed Wildlife Species Unlikely to Occur in the Project Area ....................... 13

4.4.4 Wildlife Movement Corridors........................................................................ 16

5.0 POTENTIAL IMPACTS, AVOIDANCE, MINIMIZATION, AND MITIGATION MEASURES. 17

5.1 Project Description.....................................................................................................17

5.2 Significance Threshold Criteria ..................................................................................17

5.3 Potentially Significant Impacts...................................................................................18

5.3.1 Biological Communities................................................................................ 18

5.3.2 Special-status Plant Species ....................................................................... 20

5.3.3 Special-status Wildlife Species .................................................................... 21

6.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 24 iii

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Description of California Rare Plant Ranks and Threat Codes..................................... 5 Table 2. Non-Sensitive and Sensitive Biological Communities within the Project Area............ 10

LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A – Figures
Figure 1. Project Area Location
Figure 2. Project Area Soils
Figure 3. Biological Communities Present within the Project Area Figure 4. Special-Status Plant Species within 5-Miles of the Project Area Figure 5. Special-Status Wildlife Species within 5-Miles of the Project Area Figure 6. Project Footprint
Appendix B – List of Observed Plant and Wildlife Species Appendix C – Potential for Special-status Plant and Wildlife Species to Occur in the Project Area Appendix D – Representative Project Area Photographs
Appendix E – Bird-Safe Design Letter
iv

LIST OF ACRONYMS
ADA Americans with Disabilities Act
BCDC San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission BRA Biological Resources Assessment
CCR California Code of Regulations
CDFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife
CESA California Endangered Species Act
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CFGC California Fish and Game Code
CFP California Fully Protected Species
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
City City of San Jose
CNDDB California Natural Diversity Database
CNPS California Native Plant Society
Corps U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
CRR California Ridgway’s Rail
CRPR CNPS Rare Plant Rank
CSRL California Soils Resources Lab
CWA Clean Water Act
EFH Essential Fish Habitat
EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
ESA Federal Endangered Species Act
General Plan Envision San Jose 2040 General Plan
HCP Habitat Conservation Plan
HMMP Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan
MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act
MSL Mean Sea Level
NETR Nationwide Environmental Title Research
NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service
NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
OHWM Ordinary High Water Mark
Project Alviso Hotel Project
RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board
SCVHCP Santa Clara Valley Habitat Conservation Plan
SMHM Salt Marsh Harvest Mouse
SSC Species of Special Concern
USDA U.S. Department of Agriculture
USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
USGS U.S. Geological Survey
WBWG Western Bat Working Group
WRA WRA, Inc.
v
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
1 1.0 INTRODUCTION
On December 17, 2019, WRA, Inc. (WRA) performed a Biological Resources Assessment (BRA) on a property located at 4553 North First Street, San Jose, Santa Clara County, California (Project Area, Appendix A, Figure 1). The northern portion of the approximately 6-acre Project Area is being developed as a the TopGolf entertainment complex. The southern portion is a vacant parcel and is the main subject of this analysis.

The purpose of this assessment is to gather information necessary to complete a review of biological resources under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This report describes the results of the site visit, which assessed the Project Area and immediately adjacent areas for: (1) the potential to support special-status plant and wildlife species; (2) the potential presence of sensitive biological communities such as wetlands or riparian habitats; and (3) the potential presence of other sensitive biological resources protected by local, state, and federal laws and regulations.

A BRA provides general information on the potential presence of sensitive species and habitats.

The BRA is not an official protocol-level survey for listed species that may be required for project approval by local, state, or federal agencies. Our determinations regarding the potential of the Project Area to support special-status plant and wildlife species were based primarily on the suitability of habitats within the Project Area, the proximity of known occurrences, and an on-site inspection. This assessment is based on information available at the time of the study and onsite conditions that were observed during the site visit conducted in December 2019.

2.0 REGULATORY BACKGROUND
The following sections explain the regulatory context of this BRA, including applicable laws and regulations that informed field investigations.

2.1 Sensitive Biological Communities
Sensitive biological communities include habitats that fulfill special functions or have special values, such as wetlands, streams, or riparian habitat. These habitats are protected under federal regulations such as the Clean Water Act (CWA); state regulations such as the Porter-Cologne Act, Section 1600-1616 of the California Fish and Game Code (CFGC), and CEQA; or local ordinances or policies such as city or county tree ordinances, Special Habitat Management Areas, and city or county general plan elements.

2.1.1 Waters of the United States
The United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) regulates “Waters of the United States” under Section 404 of the CWA. Waters of the U.S. are defined in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) as waters susceptible to use in commerce, including interstate waters and wetlands, all other waters (intrastate waterbodies, including wetlands), and their tributaries (33 CFR 328.3).

Potential wetland areas, according to the three criteria used to delineate wetlands as defined in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987), are identified by the presence of (1) hydrophytic vegetation, (2) hydric soils, and (3) wetland hydrology.

Areas that are inundated at a sufficient depth and for a sufficient duration to exclude growth of hydrophytic vegetation are also subject to Section 404 jurisdiction as “other waters” and are often characterized by an ordinary high water mark (OHWM), and herein referred to as non- 2 wetland waters. Non-wetland waters, for example, generally include lakes, rivers, and streams.

The placement of fill material into Waters of the U.S. generally requires an individual or nationwide permit from the Corps under Section 404 of the CWA.

2.1.2 Waters of the State
The term “Waters of the State” is defined by the Porter-Cologne Act as “any surface water or groundwater, including saline waters, within the boundaries of the state.” The Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) protects all waters in its regulatory scope and has special responsibility for wetlands, riparian areas, and headwaters. These aquatic resources have high resource value, are vulnerable to filling, and may not be systematically protected by other programs. RWQCB jurisdiction also includes wetlands and waters that may not be regulated by the Corps under Section 404, such as isolated wetlands.

Waters of the State are regulated by the RWQCB under the State Water Quality Certification Program which regulates discharges of fill and dredged material under Section 401 of the CWA and the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act. Projects that require a Corps permit or fall under other federal jurisdiction and have the potential to impact Waters of the State are required to comply with the terms of the Water Quality Certification determination. If a proposed project does not require a federal permit but does involve dredge or fill activities that may result in a discharge to Waters of the State, the RWQCB has the option to regulate the dredge and fill activities under its state authority in the form of Waste Discharge Requirements.

2.1.3 San Francisco Bay and Shoreline
The San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) has regulatory jurisdiction, as defined by the McAteer-Petris Act, over the Bay and its shoreline, which generally consists of the area between the Bay shoreline and a line 100 feet landward of and parallel to the shoreline. BCDC has two areas of jurisdiction: San Francisco Bay and the Shoreline Band. These areas are defined in the McAteer-Petris Act (PRC Section 66610). San Francisco Bay comprises areas that are subject to tidal action from the south end of the Bay to the Golden Gate (Point Bonita-Point Lobos) and to the Sacramento River line (a line between Stake Point and Simmons Point, extended northeasterly to the mouth of Marshall Cut), including all sloughs, tidelands (land lying between mean high tide and mean low tide); submerged lands (land lying below mean low tide), and marshlands. Specifically, it extends to the mean high tide line where tidal marsh is absent and up to 5 feet above mean sea level (MSL) where tidal marsh is present. The shoreline band consists of all territory located between the shoreline of San Francisco Bay as defined above and a line 100 feet landward of and parallel with that line, but excluding any portions of such territory which are included in other areas of BCDC jurisdiction; provided that the Commission may, by resolution, exclude from its area of jurisdiction any area within the shoreline band that it finds and declares is of no regional importance to the Bay.

2.1.3 Streams, Lakes, and Riparian Habitat
Streams and lakes, as habitat for fish and wildlife species, are subject to jurisdiction by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) under Sections 1600-1616 of California Fish and Game Code. Alterations to or work within or adjacent to streambeds or lakes generally require a 1602 Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement. The term “stream”, which includes creeks and rivers, is defined in the California Code of Regulations (CCR) as “a body of water that flows at least periodically or intermittently through a bed or channel having banks and supports fish or other aquatic life [including] watercourses having a surface or subsurface flow that supports or has supported riparian vegetation” (14 CCR 1.72). In addition, the term “stream” can include 3 ephemeral streams, dry washes, watercourses with subsurface flows, canals, aqueducts, irrigation ditches, and other means of water conveyance if they support aquatic life, riparian vegetation, or stream-dependent terrestrial wildlife (CDFG 1994). “Riparian” is defined as “on, or pertaining to, the banks of a stream.” Riparian vegetation is defined as “vegetation which occurs in and/or adjacent to a stream and is dependent on, and occurs because of, the stream itself” (CDFG 1994). Removal of riparian vegetation also requires a Section 1602 Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement from CDFW.

2.1.4 Essential Fish Habitat
Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) is regulated through the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), a division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Protection of EFH is mandated through changes implemented in 1996 to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act) to protect the loss of habitat necessary to maintain sustainable fisheries in the United States. The Magnuson-Stevens Act defines EFH as "those waters and substrate necessary to fish for spawning, breeding, feeding, or growth to maturity" [16 USC 1802(10)]. NMFS further defines essential fish habitat as areas that contain habitat essential to the long-term survival and health of our nation's fisheries. EFH can include the water column, certain bottom types such as sandy or rocky bottoms, vegetation such as eelgrass or kelp, or structurally complex coral or oyster reefs. Under regulatory guidelines issued by NMFS, any federal agency that authorizes, funds, or undertakes action that may affect EFH is required to consult with NMFS (50 CFR 600.920).

2.1.5 Other Sensitive Biological Communities
Other sensitive biological communities not discussed above include habitats that fulfill special functions or have special values. Natural communities considered sensitive are those identified by the CDFW in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations. The CDFW ranks sensitive communities as "threatened" or "very threatened" and keeps records of their occurrences in its California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB; CDFW 2019a). Sensitive plant communities are also identified by CDFW (2019b) and the California Native Plant Society (CNPS, 2019a).

Vegetation alliances are ranked 1 through 5 by CNDDB based on NatureServe's (2019) methodology, with those alliances ranked globally (G) or statewide (S) as 1 through 3 considered sensitive. Impacts to sensitive natural communities identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or those identified by the CDFW or United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) must be considered and evaluated under CEQA (CCR Title 14, Div. 6, Chap. 3, Appendix G). Specific habitats may also be identified as sensitive in city or county general plans or ordinances.

2.1.6 Relevant Local Policies, Ordinances, and Regulations City of San Jose Ordinances and Policies
The City of San Jose (City) Riparian Corridor Protection and Bird-Safe Design Council Policy (City 2016) provides guidance consistent with the goals, policies, and actions of the City’s Envision San Jose 2040 General Plan (General Plan; City 2011). New buildings in existing urban infill areas are required to have a minimum 100-foot setback from riparian corridors. Additionally, new development should use materials and lighting that are designed and constructed to reduce light and glare impacts to riparian corridors and should be directed away from riparian corridors.

Bird-Safe Design Guidance includes: (1) the design of buildings and structures should avoid mirrors and large areas of reflective glass, (2) avoidance of transparent glass skyways, walkways, 4 or entryways, (3) free-standing glass walls, and transparent building corners, (4) avoidance of funneling open space to a building façade.

The General Plan (City 2011) was written to serve as a guide for future development and growth in the City. Included in the General Plan is guidance pertaining to environmental resources and encourages the restoration of diked historic wetlands to their natural state by opening them to tidal action.

New development projects that create 10,000 square feet or more of impervious surface area must comply with the City Post-Construction Urban Runoff Management Policy (City 2006). This policy requires all these development and redevelopment projects to implement post-construction best management practices and treatment control measures to the maximum extent practicable.

Santa Clara Valley Habitat Plan
The Santa Clara Valley Habitat Plan (SCVHP) (County of Santa Clara 2012) is intended to provide an effective framework to protect, enhance, and restore natural resources in specific areas of Santa Clara County, while improving and streamlining the environmental permitting process for impacts on threatened and endangered species. Projects located within the SCVHP area may obtain permits and mitigation coverage through payment of in-lieu fees. Projects receiving permits through the SCVHP must also implement avoidance and minimization measures included in the SCVHP to reduce the potential for take of covered species and potential impacts to sensitive resources. These measures are outlined in Chapter 6 of the SCVHP.

2.2 Special-Status Species
Plant and Wildlife Species
Special-status species include those plants and wildlife species that have been formally listed, are proposed as endangered or threatened, or are candidates for such listing under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) or California Endangered Species Act (CESA). The ESA affords protection to federally listed species. The CESA affords protection to both state-listed species and those that are formal candidates for state listing. The federal Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act also provides broad protections to both eagle species that in some regards are similar to those provided by ESA. In addition, CDFW Species of Special Concern, which are species that face extirpation in California if current population and habitat trends continue, are considered special-status species. Although CDFW Species of Special Concern generally have no special legal status, they are given special consideration under the CEQA. Bat species are also evaluated for conservation status by the Western Bat Working Group (WBWG), a nongovernmental entity; bats named as a “High Priority” or “Medium Priority” species for conservation by the WBWG are typically considered special-status and also considered under CEQA. In addition to regulations for special-status species, most native birds in the United States (including non-status species) are protected the CFGC, i.e., sections 3503, 3503.5 and 3513, and guidance for protection is provided by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) of 1918. Under CFGC, destroying active nests, eggs, and young is illegal.

Plant species included within the CNPS Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (Inventory) with California Rare Plant Rank (CRPR) of 1 and 2 are also considered special-status plant species and must be considered under CEQA. Very few CRPR 3 or CRPR 4 plant species meet the definitions of Section 1901 Chapter 10 of the Native Plant Protection Act or Sections 2062 and 2067 of the CDFW Code that outlines CESA. However, CNPS and CDFW strongly recommend that these species be fully considered during the preparation of environmental 5 documentation relating to CEQA. This may be particularly appropriate for the type locality of a CRPR 4 plant, for populations at the periphery of a species range or in areas where the taxon is especially uncommon or has sustained heavy losses, or from populations exhibiting unusual morphology or occurring on unusual substrates. A description of the CRPRs is provided below in Table 1.

Table 1. Description of California Rare Plant Ranks and Threat Codes CRPR (formerly known as CNPS Lists)
Rank 1A Presumed extirpated in California and either rare or extinct elsewhere Rank 1B Rare, threatened, or endangered in California and elsewhere Rank 2A Presumed extirpated in California, but more common elsewhere Rank 2B Rare, threatened, or endangered in California, but more common elsewhere Rank 3 Plants about which more information is needed - A review list Rank 4 Plants of limited distribution - A watch list
Threat Ranks

0.1 Seriously threatened in California

0.2 Moderately threatened in California

0.3 Not very threatened in California
Critical Habitat
Critical habitat is a term defined in the ESA as a specific geographic area that contains features essential for the conservation of a threatened or endangered species and that may require special management and protection. The ESA requires federal agencies to consult with the USFWS to conserve listed species on their lands and to ensure that any activities or projects they fund, authorize, or carry out will not jeopardize the survival of a threatened or endangered species. In consultation for those species with critical habitat, federal agencies must also ensure that their activities or projects do not adversely modify critical habitat to the point that it will no longer aid in the species’ recovery. In many cases, this level of protection is similar to that already provided to species by the ESA jeopardy standard. However, areas that are currently unoccupied by the species but that are needed for the species’ recovery are protected by the prohibition against adverse modification of critical habitat.

3.0 METHODS
On December 17, 2019, the Project Area was traversed on foot to determine: (1) plant communities present within the Project Area, (2) if existing conditions provided suitable habitat for any special-status plant or wildlife species, and (3) if sensitive habitats are present. All plant and wildlife species encountered were recorded and are listed in Appendix B. Plants were identified using The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California 2nd Edition (Baldwin et al. 2012) and Jepson Flora Project (eFlora 2019) to the taxonomic level necessary to determine rarity.

Plant nomenclature follows the Jepson Flora Project (2019), except where noted. For cases in 6 which regulatory agencies, CNPS, or other entities base rarity on older taxonomic treatments, precedence was given to the treatment used by those entities.

3.1 Biological Communities
Prior to the site visit, soil survey data for Santa Clara County (CSRL 2019) were examined to determine whether any unique soil types capable of supporting sensitive plant communities or aquatic features have been mapped in the Project Area. Additional sources, such as U.S.

Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute quadrangle maps for the Calaveras Reservoir, Milpitas, Niles, San Jose East, San Jose West, Cupertino, La Costa Valley, Mountain View, and Newark quadrangles (USGS 2018a-i) and available aerial imagery (Google Earth 2019, NETR 2019) were also reviewed to determine the potential for sensitive biological communities to occur in the Project Area. Where possible, biological communities were classified based on existing descriptions found in A Manual of California Vegetation, Online Edition (CNPS 2019a). However, it was necessary to identify variants of community types or to describe non-vegetated or heavily disturbed areas that are not described in the literature. Biological communities were classified as sensitive or non-sensitive as defined by CEQA and other applicable laws and regulations.

3.1.1 Non-sensitive Biological Communities
Non-sensitive biological communities are those communities that are not afforded special protection under CEQA, and other state, federal, and local laws, regulations, and ordinances.

These communities may, however, provide suitable habitat for some special-status plant or wildlife species and are identified or described in Section 4.4.1 below.

3.1.2 Sensitive Biological Communities
Sensitive biological communities are defined as those communities that are given special protection under CEQA and other applicable federal, state, and local laws, regulations and ordinances. Applicable laws and ordinances are discussed above in Section 2.0. Special methods used to identify sensitive biological communities are discussed below. Sensitive biological communities are identified and described in Section 4.4.1 below.

Wetlands and Non-Wetland Waters
The Project Area was surveyed to determine if any wetlands and non-wetland waters potentially subject to jurisdiction by the Corps, RWQCB, or CDFW were present. The assessment was based primarily on the presence of wetland plant indicators and inundation, but may also include any observed indicators of wetland hydrology or wetland soils. Any potential wetland areas were identified as areas dominated by plant species with a wetland indicator status1 of OBL, FACW, or FAC as given on the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers National Wetlands Plant List (Lichvar et al. 2016). Evidence of wetland hydrology can include direct evidence (primary indicators), such as visible inundation or saturation, algal mats, and oxidized root channels, or indirect (secondary) indicators, such as a water table within two feet of the soil surface during the dry season. Some indicators of wetland soils include dark colored soils, soils with a sulfidic odor, and soils that contain redoximorphic features as defined by the Corps Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987) and Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States (USDA 2018).

1 OBL = Obligate, always found in wetlands; FACW = Facultative wetland, usually found in wetlands; FAC = Facultative, equal occurrence in wetland or non-wetlands.
7 The preliminary wetland and non-wetland waters assessment was based primarily on the presence of areas characterized by hydrophytic vegetation or unvegetated, ponded areas.

Collection of additional data will be necessary to prepare a delineation report suitable for submission to the Corps.

Other Sensitive Biological Communities
The Project Area was evaluated for the presence of other sensitive biological communities, including riparian areas or other sensitive plant communities recognized by CDFW. Prior to the site visit, aerial photographs, local soil maps, and A Manual of California Vegetation, Online Edition (CNPS 2019a) were reviewed to assess the potential for sensitive biological communities to occur in the Project Area. All alliances within the Project Area with a ranking of 1 through 3 in the Natural Communites List (CDFW 2019b) were considered sensitive biological communities and mapped. These communities are described in Section 4.1.2 below.

3.2 Special-Status Species

3.2.1 Literature Review
Potential occurrence of special-status species in the Project Area was evaluated by first determining which special-status species occur in the vicinity of the Project Area through a literature and database search. Database searches for known occurrences of special-status species focused on the Milpitas, Mountain View, Newark, Niles, La Costa Valley, Calaveras Reservoir, San Jose East, San Jose West, and Cupertino quadrangles (USGS 2018a-i). The following sources were reviewed to determine which special-status plant and wildlife species have been documented to occur in the vicinity of the Project Area:
• A Field Guide to Western Reptiles and Amphibians (Stebbins 2003) • Aerial photographs (Google Earth 2019, NETR 2019)
• Inventory (CNPS 2019b)
• CNDDB (CDFW 2019a)
• CDFG publication “California’s Wildlife, Volumes I-III” (Zeiner et al. 1990) • CDFW and University of California Press publication California Amphibian and Reptile Species of Special Concern (Thomson et al. 2016)
• CDFW publication, California Bird Species of Special Concern in California (Shuford and Gardali 2008)
• Final Santa Clara Valley Habitat Plan (County of Santa Clara 2012) • Historic Aerials (NETR 2019)
• National Wetland Inventory (USFWS 2019a)
• Information for Conservation and Planning Database (USFWS 2019b) • Online Soil Survey (CSRL 2019)
• WBWG, Species Accounts Region 5 (WBWG 2019)

3.2.2 Site Assessment
The December 2019 site visit was conducted to search for suitable habitats for listed species.

Habitat conditions observed at the Project Area were used to evaluate the potential for presence of listed species based on these searches and the professional expertise of the investigating biologists. The potential for each listed species to occur in the Project Area was then evaluated according to the following criteria:
8 • No Potential: Habitat on and adjacent to the site is clearly unsuitable for the species requirements (foraging, breeding, cover, substrate, elevation, hydrology, plant community, site history, disturbance regime).
• Unlikely: Few of the habitat components meeting the species requirements are present, and/or the majority of habitat on and adjacent to the site is unsuitable or of very poor quality. The species is not likely to be found on the site. • Moderate Potential: Some of the habitat components meeting the species requirements are present, and/or only some of the habitat on or adjacent to the site is unsuitable. The species has a moderate probability of being found on the site.
• High Potential: All of the habitat components meeting the species requirements are present and/or most of the habitat on or adjacent to the site is highly suitable.

The species has a high probability of being found on the site. • Present: Species is observed on the site or has been recorded (i.e., CNDDB, other reports) on the site recently.

The site assessment is intended to identify the presence or absence of suitable habitat for each special-status species known to occur in the vicinity to determine its potential to occur in the Project Area. The site visit does not constitute a protocol-level survey and is not intended to determine the actual presence or absence of a species. All species observed in the Project Area were recorded and are listed in Appendix B.

In cases where little information is known about species occurrences and habitat requirements, the species evaluation was based on best professional judgment of WRA biologists with experience working with these species and habitats.

Special-status species, if observed during the site visit, were recorded and are discussed below in Section 4.3 and in Appendix C. For some species, a site assessment visit at the level conducted for this report may not be sufficient to determine presence or absence of a species to the specifications of regulatory agencies. In these cases, a species may be assumed to be present or further protocol-level special-status species surveys may be necessary. Special-status species for which further protocol-level surveys may be necessary are described in Section 5.0.

4.0 RESULTS
A general description of the Project Area and the results of the site assessment are provided in the following sections. A list of plant and wildlife species observed is included as Appendix B.

The assessment of the potential for special-status plant and wildlife species to occur in the Project Area is provided as Appendix C. Photographs of the Project Area are provided as Appendix D.

4.1 Project Area Description
An analysis of available historic aerial imagery (NETR 2019, Google Earth 2019) shows that the Project Area and surrounding region were used for agricultural purposes from at least 1948 through at least 1960. Prior to the 1960s, the Guadalupe River ran through the Project Area. By 1968, Guadalupe River was channelized and relocated west of the Project Area; the now-isolated drainage feature observed in the Project Area is part of the original alignment of the Guadalupe River that was left intact. Over time, the topography the Project Area and surrounding areas were altered by grading, fill, and development, and the Project Area is now surrounded on all sides by residential and commercial development, undeveloped vacant lands, and to the west, the developed Guadalupe River trail and the modern Guadalupe River channel. 9 The northern portion of the Project Area is a flat graded terrace currently under construction.

Much of the northern portion of the Project Area is being developed as a TopGolf entertainment complex, and several structures associated with outdoor recreation have been installed. The southern portion of the Project Area is comprised of a steep-banked, relict portion of the Guadalupe River channel, and an adjacent (to the north), vacant, flat terrace. Several homeless encampments were observed in the southern portion of the Project Area.

4.2 Soils
The online soil survey (CSRL 2019) indicates that the Project Area contains three soil mapping units from three soil series: Novato clay, 0 to 1 percent slopes, tidally flooded, Clear Lake silty clay, 0 to 2 percent slopes drained, and Campbell silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, protected.

These native soil series are described below and are shown on Figure 2.

Campbell Series: The Campbell series consist of moderately fine or fine texture soils that occur on very gently sloping fringes of alluvial fans. A representative profile for this series consist of grayish brown (10YR 5/2) or dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2) with rust-brown mottles. The Campbell soil series is not on the U.S. national hydric soils list (NRCS 2019).

Clear Lake Series: The Clear Lake series consists of very deep, poorly drained soils located on plains and flat basins, which formed in alluvium derived from sandstone and shale. A representative profile for the series consists of a very dark gray (N 3/0) clay layer 39 inches thick with few faint redoximorphic concentrations in the upper 13 inches. Below this layer to a depth of about 60 inches is a light olive brown (2.5Y 5/4) clay layer with light yellowish brown (10YR 6/4) masses of iron accumulations. This soil is a very hard, firm, and very sticky clay. These soils are listed on the U.S. national hydric soils list (NRCS 2019).

Novato Series: The Novato series consists of deep, very poorly drained soils that formed in alluvium deposited along the margin of bays. Novato soils consist of, silty clay loams, silty clays, or clays with very slow runoff and slow permeability. A representative profile for this series consists of very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2) clay loam to 6 inches with dark brown (7.5YR 3/4) mottles. This is underlain by dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2) clay with many very dark brown (7.5YR 2.5/3) mottles. These soils are listed on the U.S. national hydric soils list (NRCS 2019).

4.3 Biological Communities
Table 2 summarizes the area of each biological community type observed in the Project Area.

Two non-sensitive biological communities are present in the Project Area: developed and ruderal herbaceous. Two sensitive aquatic communities are present in the Project Area: seasonal wetlands and non-wetland waters. Biological communities in the Project Area are shown on Figure 3 and further described below.
10 Table 2. Non-Sensitive and Sensitive Biological Communities within the Project Area Biological Community Acres within the Project Area
Non-Sensitive
Developed 3.00
Ruderal Herbaceous 2.49
Sensitive
Seasonal Wetland 0.16
Non-Wetland Waters 0.58
Total 6.23

4.3.1 Non-Sensitive Biological Communities
Developed. CDFW Rank: none. The northern portion of the Project Area consists of mostly bare ground, which has been graded and is currently under construction. Grading appears to be active and recent, as the only vegetation in developed areas consisted of sparse cover by annual grass seedlings. Due to the early stage of growth, vegetation in developed areas was not identifiable.

Ruderal Herbaceous. CDFW Rank: none. As described above, the Project Area has been highly altered and disturbed. As a result, the vegetation is characterized by non-native, herbaceous species typical of ruderal, highly disturbed conditions. Ruderal herbaceous vegetation was observed along the slopes of the Guadalupe River canal and within the southern portion of the Project Area below the recently graded area. Dominant species observed include black mustard (Brassica nigra), ripgut brome (Bromus diandrus), smilo grass (Stipa miliacea var. miliacea), and oat grass (Avena spp.). Scattered coyote brush (Baccharis pilularis) was present in the eastern portion of the Project Area, and other shrub species are occasionally present at low cover, including Italian buckthorn (Rhamnus alaterna) and tree tobacco (Nicotiana glauca).

4.3.2 Sensitive Aquatic Communities
Seasonal wetland. CWA Section 404/401. Three potential seasonal wetlands are present in the shallow depressions in the terrace northwest of the non-wetland waters feature (Figure 3). These depressions are characterized by mix of hydrophytic and often halophytic vegetation such as pickleweed (Salicornia pacifica), alkali heath (Frankenia salina), perennial pepperweed (Lepidium latifolium), salt grass (Distichlis spicata), and beardless wildrye (Elymus triticoides). The edges of these features transition into the vegetation characteristic of the ruderal herbaceous biological community. Shrubs and trees were absent.

Non-Wetland Waters. CDFW Rank: none. CWA Section 404/401, CFGC Section 1600. The non-wetland waters feature, present along the southern boundary of the Project Area, is comprised of the relict portion of the historic Guadalupe River channel (Figure 3). Between 1960 and 1968, the Guadalupe River was channelized, creating this isolated drainage feature. No inlet or outlet was observed during the site visit. Despite having no apparent inlet, based on historic aerial imagery (Google Earth 2019), this feature appears to be perennially inundated, with only slight fluctuations in the water level. Given the depth of this feature, ground water may be a primary source of the perennial inundation, but further investigation would be required to confirm this. Non-wetland waters within the Project Area do not have any tidal connection to the Bay or the Guadalupe River, they are not subject to BCDC’s Bay jurisdiction. The Project Area is also 11 greater than 100 feet inland from nearby tidal vegetation, at its closest, and thus it is not within the Shoreline Band.

The non-wetland waters feature is almost entirely unvegetated, though a narrow band of hydrophytic vegetation is present around the water’s edge comprised primarily of pickleweed and salt grass. This narrow band of vegetation was too small to map separately and was included as part of the non-wetland waters feature.

4.3 Special-Status Species

4.3.1 Special-Status Plant Species
Based upon a review of the resources and databases listed above, 51 special-status plant species have been documented in the vicinity of the Project Area. Two of these species have moderate or high potential to occur within the Project Area. The remaining 49 species are unlikely or have no potential to occur in the Project Area as a result of the high level of disturbance and a lack of suitable habitat elements such as vernal pool, chaparral, and woodland habitats or serpentine substrate. No special-status plant species were observed during the assessment site visit.

Special-status plant species documented in the CNDDB within 5 miles of the Project Area are shown in Figure 4. The two species with moderate or high potential to occur within the Project Area are discussed below. Measures to reduce avoid or reduce impacts to a less than significant level for the following species are described in Section 5.3 of this assessment.

Congdon’s tarplant (Centromadia parryi ssp. congdonii). CRPR 1B.1. High Potential.

Congdon’s tarplant is an annual herb in the composite family (Asteraceae) that blooms from May to October (November). It typically occurs on alkaline soils, sometimes described as heavy white clay, in valley and foothill grassland habitats ranging from 0 to 755 feet (0 to 230 meters) in elevation (CDFW 2019a, CNPS 2019b). Known associated species include hyssop loosestrife, coyote thistle (Eryngium sp.), annual beard grass (Polypogon monspeliensis), and Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon) (CDFW 2019a). The nearest known occurrence of Congdon’s tarplant is half a mile east of the Project Area, in an annually disked ruderal field (CDFW 2019a).

Congdon’s tarplant is a disturbance-adapted species, and within the Project Area, it has high potential to occur at the edges of the non-wetland waters feature and in mesic areas on the terrace above the non-wetland waters feature, which have not already been graded. At the time of the December 17, 2019 site visit, site conditions were not suitable to ascertain presence of this species given its phenology and prior site disturbance.

San Joaquin spearscale (Extriplex joaquinana). CRPR 1B.2. Moderate Potential. San Joaquin spearscale is an annual herb in the goosefoot family (Chenopodiaceae) that blooms from April to October. It typically occurs in seasonal alkali sink scrub and wetlands in chenopod scrub, alkali meadow, and valley and foothill grassland habitat at elevations ranging from 0 to 2,740 feet in elevation (CDFW 2019a, CNPS 2019b). Known associated species include salt grass, alkali heath, Mediterranean barley (Hordeum marinum), Italian rye grass (Festuca perennis), bird’s-foot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus), docks (Rumex crispus, R. pulcher), tarplants (Centromadia parryi, C. pungens), pickleweed, and fat hen (Atriplex triangularis) (CDFW 2019a). The nearest known occurrence of San Joaquin spearscale is over 4.5 miles north of the Project Area, in the Pacific Commons Preserve, where it was observed growing on the edge of a created vernal pool.

San Joaquin spearscale is a disturbance-tolerant species, and within the Project Area, it has moderate potential to occur at the edges of the non-wetland waters feature and in mesic areas on the terrace above the non-wetland waters feature, which have not already been graded. 12 4.3.2 Special-Status Wildlife
42 special-status wildlife species have been recorded in the vicinity of the Project Area. Appendix C summarizes the potential for each of these species to occur within the Project Area. The species determined to have no potential to occur within the Project Area require habitat elements which are completely absent from the site such as tidal estuaries or marshes, perennial stream or riverine sources, vernal pools, riparian habitat, rock outcrops, buildings, and forest communities. For the species determined to be unlikely to occur at the site, some elements of suitable habitat may be present (e.g., grasses, brackish water, trees, or shrubs); however, the distance from known ranges or documented occurrences, and/or the lack of required habitat elements (e.g., tidally influenced water, burrows, etc.) reduce the potential for these species to occur and may preclude their presence. One special-status species that has been evaluated to be unlikely and is in the SCVHP survey zone is tricolored blackbird (Agelaius tricolor).

Of the 42 special-status species documented in the vicinity of the Project Area, four have potential to occur within the Project Area, including San Francisco common yellowthroat (Geothlypis trichas sinuosa), white-tailed kite (Elanus leucurus), northern harrier (Circus cyaneus), and burrowing owl (BUOW, Athene cunicularia). These three species are discussed below. Measures to reduce avoid or reduce impacts to a less than significant level for the following species are described in Section 5.3 of this assessment.

San Francisco (saltmarsh) common yellowthroat (Geothlypis trichas sinuosa); CDFW Species of Special Concern. Moderate Potential. This subspecies of the common yellowthroat is found in freshwater marshes, coastal swales, riparian thickets, brackish marshes, and saltwater marshes. Their breeding range extends from Tomales Bay in the north, Carquinez Strait to the east, and Santa Cruz County to the south. This species requires thick, continuous cover such as tall grasses, tule patches, or riparian vegetation down to the water surface for foraging and prefers willows for nesting (Shuford and Gardali 2008).

Foraging habitat for this species is not present around water features contained within the Project Area, but is present along the adjacent Guadalupe river corridor in dense cattail patches. Nesting may occur in small shrubs along the periphery of the Project Area; thus this species has moderate potential to occur.

White-tailed Kite (Elanus leucurus); CDFW Fully Protected. Moderate Potential. Whitetailed kite is resident in open to semi-open habitats throughout the lower elevations of California, including grasslands, savannahs, woodlands, agricultural areas and wetlands. Vegetative structure and prey availability seem to be more important habitat elements than associations with specific plants or vegetative communities (Dunk 1995). Nests are constructed mostly of twigs and placed in trees, often at habitat edges. Nest trees are highly variable in size, structure, and immediate surroundings, ranging from shrubs to trees greater than 150 feet tall (Dunk 1995). This species preys upon a variety of small mammals, as well as other vertebrates and invertebrates.

Foraging areas for this species are widely present in the vicinity of the Project Area, mainly in the areas associated with adjacent Don Edwards National Wildlife Refuge. Nesting habitat on the Project Area is limited, although several isolated trees and shrubs are present that could serve as nesting substrates. Foraging habitat exists on the Project Area in the ruderal herbaceous areas. Given the presence of foraging and limited nesting habitat in the vicinity, this species has moderate potential to occur on the Project Area.

Northern Harrier (Circus cyaneus); CDFW Species of Special Concern. Moderate Potential.

Northern harrier occurs as a resident and winter visitor in open habitats throughout most of 13 California, including freshwater and brackish marshes, grasslands and fields, agricultural areas, and deserts. Harriers typically nest in treeless areas within patches of dense, relatively tall, vegetation, the composition of which is highly variable; nests are placed on the ground and often located near water or within wetlands (Shuford and Gardali 2008). Harriers are birds of prey and subsist on a variety of small mammals and other vertebrates.

Foraging habitat for this species is present on the Project Area in developed ruderal herbaceous areas, as well as in the vicinity within wetland and ruderal herbaceous and other open space areas. Nesting opportunities for this species are limited within the Project Area, but nesting may occur in vegetation along the edges of the seasonal wetland area. Due to the presence of nearby foraging habitat and potential nesting habitat, this species has moderate potential to occur on the Project Area.

Burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia). CDFW Species of Special Concern; USFWS Bird of Conservation Concern. The burrowing owl occurs as a year-round resident and winter visitor in much of California’s lowlands, inhabiting open areas with sparse or non-existent tree or shrub canopies. Typical habitat is annual or perennial grassland, although human-modified areas such as agricultural lands and airports are also used (Poulin et al. 1993). This species is dependent on burrowing mammals to provide the burrows that are characteristically used for shelter and nesting, and in northern California is typically found in close association with California ground squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi). Manmade substrates such as pipes or debris piles may also be occupied in place of burrows. Prey consists of insects and small vertebrates. Breeding typically takes place from March to July.

Burrowing owl is routinely documented in the vicinity of the Project Area, the closest occurrence being 0.3 mile to the southeast (CDFW 2019a). Though ground squirrel activity has not been observed on the Project Area, individual ground squirrels were heard making alarm calls along the Guadalupe River levee during the December 17, 2019 site visit. Burrow surrogates are additionally available on the Project Area within developed areas, chiefly in the form of concrete block piles and culverts around water features. Current vegetation conditions on the Project Area within ruderal herbaceous and developed communities are characterized by bare ground or sprouting annual grasses, and most areas are dominated by vegetation <6” in height with the exception of the seasonal wetland area. Although ground squirrel activity is not currently present on the site, burrowing owl occurs regularly nearby and has a moderate potential to use burrow surrogate features on the site for wintering or breeding.

4.3.3 Listed Wildlife Species Unlikely to Occur in the Project Area Listed species that are documented to occur in the vicinity of the Project Area, but are unlikely or have no potential to occur in the Project Area include: California black rail (Laterallus jamaicensis coturniculus), California Ridgway’s rail (Rallus obsoletus obsoletus), tricolored blackbird (Agelaius tricolor), salt marsh harvest mouse (SMHM, Reithrodontomys raviventris), and California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiensis). These species are discussed below.

California black rail (Laterallus jamaicensis coturniculus), State Threatened, CDFW Fully Protected Species. Unlikely. California black rail is the resident black rail subspecies that occurs in California coastal salt and brackish marshes from Bodega Bay to Morro Bay, with additional populations known from freshwater marshes near or in the northern Sierra Nevada foothills (Eddleman et al. 1994, Richmond et al. 2008). According to a published analysis by Spautz et al. (2005), important habitat elements for this species within the San Francisco Bay estuary are: 1) emergent marsh dominated by pickleweed (Salicornia spp.), marsh gumplant (Grindelia stricta), bulrush (Bolboschoenus maritimus), rushes (Juncus spp.), and/or cattails 14 (Typha spp.); 2) high density of vegetation below four inches in height; 3) high marsh elevation with transitional upland vegetation; 4) large total area of contiguous marsh; 5) proximity to a major water source; and, 6) isolation from disturbance. This species feeds primarily on invertebrates.

Black rails are extremely secretive and very difficult to glimpse or flush; identification typically relies on voice. Nests are placed on the ground in dense wetland vegetation.

California black rail is documented to occur nearby on portions of the Don Edwards National Wildlife Refuge Complex (CDFW 2019a). However, suitable habitat is typically characterized by large contiguous areas of marsh with adjacent areas of transitional upland. The Project Area does not contain these or any other habitat characteristics typical of areas occupied by this species. Construction activites and related disturbances are present in the Project Area as part of previously permitted projects and surrounding urban development. Though individuals of this species may periodically forage along the margins of the adjacent Guadalupe River, this species is unlikely to occur on the Project Area.

California Ridgway’s (clapper) rail (Rallus obsoletus obsoletus). Federal Endangered, State Endangered, CDFW Fully Protected Species. The California Ridgway’s rail (CRR), formerly known as California clapper rail (R. longirostris obsoletus), is the resident Ridgway’s/clapper rail subspecies of northern and central California. Although more widespread in the past, it is currently restricted to the San Francisco Bay estuary. The CRR occurs only within salt and brackish marshes. According to Harvey (1988), Shuford (1993) and Eddleman and Conway (1998), important CRR habitat components are: 1) well-developed tidal sloughs and secondary channels; 2) beds of cordgrasss (Spartina spp.) in the lower marsh zone; 3) dense salt marsh vegetation for cover, nest sites, and brooding areas; 4) intertidal mudflats, gradually sloping banks of tidal channels, and cordgrass beds for foraging; 5) abundant invertebrate food resources; and 6) transitional vegetation at the marsh edge to serve as a refuge during high tides.

In south and central San Francisco Bay and along the perimeter of San Pablo Bay, CRR typically inhabits salt marshes dominated by pickleweed and cordgrasss. Brackish marshes supporting CRR occur along major sloughs and rivers of San Pablo Bay and along tidal sloughs of Suisun Marsh. Nesting occurs from March through July, with peak activity in late April to late May (DeGroot 1927, Harvey 1980, Harvey 1988). CRR nests, constructed of wetland vegetation and platform-shaped, are placed near the ground in clumps of dense vegetation, usually in the lower marsh zone near small tidal channels (DeGroot 1927, Evens and Page 1983, Harvey 1988).

California Ridgway’s rail is documented to occur nearby on portions of the Don Edwards National Wildlife Refuge Complex (CDFW 2019a). However, suitable habitat is typically characterized by large contiguous areas of marsh with tidally influenced water bodies and large tidal mudflats for foraging. The Project Area does not contain these or any other habitat characteristics typical of areas occupied by this species. Construction activites and related disturbances are present in the Project Area as part of previously permitted projects and surrounding urban development.

Though individuals of this species may periodically forage along the margins of the adjacent Guadalupe River, this species is unlikely to occur on the Project Area.

Tricolored blackbird (Agelaius tricolor). State Threatened, CDFW Species of Special Concern. The tricolored blackbird is a locally common resident in the Central Valley and along coastal California. Most tricolored blackbirds reside in the Central Valley March through August, then moving into the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and east to Merced County and coastal locations during winter (Meese et al. 2014). This species breeds adjacent to fresh water, preferring emergent wetlands with tall, dense cattails or tules, thickets of willow or blackberry, and/or tall herbs. Flooded agricultural fields with dense vegetation are also used (Shuford and Gardali 2008). This species is highly colonial; nesting habitat must be large enough to support a minimum of 30 pairs, and colonies are commonly substantially larger (up to thousands of pairs). 15 The tricolored blackbird often intermingles with other blackbird species during the non-breeding season. Individuals typically forage up to 5.6 miles (9 kilometers) from their colonies although in most cases only a small part of the area within this range provides suitable foraging (Hamilton and Meese 2006).

Tricolored blackbird have been documented in the area; the nearest documented occurrence of this species is approximately 2.3 miles to the east in the riparian vegetation along Coyote Creek (CDFW 2019a). However this species relies on dense emergent vegetation (i.e., cattails) adjacent to semi-fresh water sources such as; rivers, lakes, creeks, and/or pond edges. Although the Project Area does have a water source, the Project Area does not contain emergent vegetation or other tall herbaceous vegetation suitable for this species’ foraging and nesting.

Suitable habitat for this species occurs chiefly along the Guadalupe River. This species is unlikely to occur on the Project Area.

Salt Marsh Harvest Mouse (Reithrodontomys raviventris), Federal Endangered, State Endangered, CDFW Fully Protected Species. Unlikely. SMHM is a relatively small rodent found only in suitable salt- and brackish-marsh habitat in the greater San Francisco Bay, San Pablo Bay, and Suisun Bay areas. This species has been divided into two subspecies: the northern SMHM (Reithrodontomys raviventris halicoetes) which lives in the brackish marshes of the San Pablo and Suisun Bays, and the SMHM (Reithrodontomys raviventris raviventris) which is found in the marshes of San Francisco Bay. The Project Area occurs within the range of the southern subspecies, which generally persists in smaller and more isolated populations than the northern subspecies. Most of the marshes of the South San Francisco Bay in particular are narrow, strip-like marshes and thus support fewer harvest mice than those in the northern portions of the species’ range (USFWS 2010). The basic habitat associated with SMHM has been described as pickleweed dominated vegetation (Fisler 1965), though more recent studies have shown that SMHM is supported equally in pickleweed-dominated and mixed-vegetation (including native and non-native salt- and brackish-marsh species) (Sustaita et al. 2005, Sustaita et al. 2011). Known SMHM habitat in the Suisun Bay marshes is often composed of mixed salt- and brackish-marsh vegetation such as rushes, alkali heath, fat hen, and saltgrass, with pickleweed as a relatively minor component. The SMHM does not burrow, and thus it is dependent on yearround vegetative cover. As such, the plant species composition is less important than the quality of cover from predators and the food provided by the vegetation. SMHM prefers deep, dense vegetative cover between 11.8 and 23.6 inches [30 – 50 centimeters] in height (USFWS 2013), though there are indicators that shorter stands (5.9 inches [15 centimeters] is the shortest commonly used) of pickleweed may also support an abundance of this species (Fisler 1965; Shellhammer et al. 1982).

SMHM is present in contiguous areas of pickleweed marsh contained within Don Edwards National Wildlife Refuge. The Project Area itself, however, provides marginal habitat for this species. The seasonal wetland area may provide potential foraging habitat on the Project Area, although vegetation in this area is likely not sufficiently dense to provide adequate cover for SMHM, and would leave them highly exposed to predators, including feral cats that are present nearby. The Project Area does not contain primary habitat for this species, and any individuals that may forage or seek high tide refuge on portions of the Project Area would originate from the emergent vegetation along the Guadalupe river, which is chiefly comprised of plant species not typical of SMHM occupation. The existing bike path along the Guadalupe river and corresponding infrastructure (i.e. short wall between the path and the river) provide a barrier to dispersal for SMHM that might forage within the Project Area. Suitable upland refugia exists on the river side of the bike path as well, suggesting that SMHM would not need to disperse in the Project Area during high tide events. The nearest occurrences of this species are additionally 2.5 miles or 16 more from the Project Area, and are separated from the Project Area by residential and light industrial development (CDFW 2019a). Due to significant barriers of dispersal onto the Project Area and the lack of suitable upland habitat, this species is unlikely to occur on the Project Area.

California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense), Federal Threatened, State Threatened. The California tiger salamander is restricted to grasslands and low-elevation foothill regions in California (generally under 1500 feet) where it uses seasonal aquatic habitats for breeding. The salamanders breed in natural ephemeral pools, or ponds that mimic ephemeral pools (stock ponds that go dry), and occupy substantial areas surrounding the breeding pool as adults. California tiger salamanders spend most of their time in the grasslands surrounding breeding pools. They survive hot, dry summers by living underground in burrows (such as those created by ground squirrels and other mammals and deep cracks or holes in the ground) where the soil atmosphere remains near the water saturation point. During wet periods, the salamanders may emerge from refugia and feed in the surrounding grasslands.

The nearest documented occurrences of the species are approximately 4.25 miles to the north, and are confined to vernal pool habitats in uplands associated with Don Edwards National Wildlife Refuge (CDFW 2019a). No vernal pool habitats exist on the Project Area, and mammal burrows are limited within close proximity to any water features. The Project Area was historically tidal marsh habitat and habitat or within the local range for the species. Furthermore, the Project Area lacks a source population for colonizations. The nearest known occurrences of this species are beyond the typically accepted dispersal distance for this species, and the interceding space provides many barriers to dispersal including urban development and numerous large highways and interstates. Due to the lack of suitable habitat on the Project Area and the lack of a nearby source population that could provide colonizing individuals, this species is unlikely to occur on the Project Area.

4.3.4 Wildlife Movement Corridors
Wildlife corridors provide connectivity between habitat areas for common species, enhancing species richness and diversity. Where habitat areas are subject to pressures from development, defined movement corridors and/or contiguous open space areas are of particular importance as they provide cover, water, and food between seasonal breeding and foraging areas.

Most of the Project Area has currently been cleared of vegetation and graded. Remaining annual grassland in the Project Area, mainly present around seasonal wetlands and near the non-wetland water feature, may serve as a corridor for local wildlife. East of the Project Area, residential development and light industrial development quickly becomes dense. Dense development to the east likely precludes wildlife movement in this direction. Animals may traverse the Project Area briefly during use of the Guadalupe River as a foraging habitat, though they would likely preferentially use existing larger tracts of annual grassland present immediately to the south to avoid ongoing disturbances associated with construction and corporate operations. Adjacent and nearby barriers to dispersal include fencing that abuts pavement (preventing burrowing underneath) and without openings large enough to allow passage. These barriers reduce the functionality of the Project Area as a corridor other than occasional local movements in this direction. The Project Area is additionally not contained within any defined habitat connectivity areas described in the Essential Connectivity Areas dataset (CDFW 2014). 17 5.0 POTENTIAL IMPACTS, AVOIDANCE, MINIMIZATION, AND MITIGATION MEASURES

5.1 Project Description
The Alviso Hotel Project (Project) proposes construction of a 108,702 square foot, 215-room hotel in a five-story building. The northeastern corner of the site would include a surface parking lot with 43 parking spaces, and a three-story parking garage with 192 spaces, for a total of 235 parking spaces. Figure 6 shows the Project footprint in relation to biological communities within the Project Area. The proposed five-story building would reach a maximum height of 65 feet including architectural elements, mechanical equipment screens, and elevator shafts. The eastern side of the building would be set back 50 feet from the wetland area to the southeast.

The proposed building exterior would include use of standing seam metal roof, horizontal and vertical fiber-cement siding, metal siding, aluminum storefront lobby entry, garage green screen, perforated metal panels, vinyl windows, metal railing balconies, and bay windows.

The Project would not involve demolition since the Project footprint is currently undeveloped.

Construction activities would last approximately six months, beginning in spring of 2021. Access to the site would be provided by a 26-foot wide driveway on the northwestern corner of the Project Area. This driveway would connect with two planned roads from an adjacent project, both exiting onto North First Street. The driveway would also connect with two proposed roadways within the proposed site. As described above, a total of 235 parking spaces would be provided, including 14 electrical vehicle parking spaces, and nine Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) parking spaces.

A number of new trees will be planted in the Project Area. Landscaping will also include a wide variety of small, medium, and large shrubs and grasses. Landscaping would be installed around the boundary of the site, as well as throughout the site’s interior. The total landscaped area proposed would be 187,792 square-feet.

The site would be graded to drain in a northwest direction. Bioretention swales with catch basins would be installed in the northwest and south corners of the project site. The Project would install new storm drains, which would connect with planned storm drain lines from an adjacent project.

5.2 Significance Threshold Criteria
Pursuant to Appendix G, Section IV of the State CEQA Guidelines, a project would have a significant impact on biological resources if it would:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special-status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the CDFW or USFWS; b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the CDFW or USFWS;
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the CWA (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means; 18 d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites;
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance; and/or,
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan.

This report utilizes these thresholds in the analysis of impacts and determination of the significance of those impacts. The assessment of impacts under CEQA is based on the changes caused by the Project relative to the existing conditions in the Project Area. The existing conditions in the Project Area are described above, based on the site visit conducted in 2019. In applying CEQA Appendix G, the terms “substantial” and “substantially” are used as the basis for significance determinations in many of the thresholds, but are not defined qualitatively or quantitatively in CEQA or in technical literature. In some cases, such as direct impacts to specialstatus species listed under the CESA or ESA, the determination of a substantial impact may be relatively straightforward. In other cases, the determination is less clear, and requires application of best professional judgment based on knowledge of site conditions as well as the ecology and physiology of biological resources present in a given area. Determinations of whether or not Project activities will result in a substantial adverse effect to biological resources are discussed in the following sections for sensitive biological communities, special-status plant species, and special-status wildlife species.

5.3 Potentially Significant Impacts
Two sensitive aquatic communities are present within the Project Area: seasonal wetland and non-wetland waters. Two special-status plant species and four special-status wildlife species have potential to occur within the Project Area. Potential impacts to these sensitive resources associated with the proposed Project are discussed below. Recommended avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures to reduce such impacts are also included.

5.3.1 Biological Communities
Impact BIO-01: Wetlands and Non-Wetland Waters
The Project Area contains two sensitive aquatic communities: seasonal wetland and non-wetland waters. Seasonal wetland and non-wetland waters within the Project Area are potentially subject to Corps and RWQCB under Sections 404 and 401 of the CWA, CDFW under Section 1600 of the CFGC. Any impacts to these aquatic communities would be potentially significant and would require the obtainment of relevant permits thorugh the Corps, RWQCB, and CDFW. Without proper erosion and sedimentation measures, ground-disturbing activities and vegetation removal also increase the likelihood of sedimentation occurring in adjacent seasonal wetland and nonwetland waters wthin the Project Area outside of the proposed limit of disturbance. Additionally, earth work and equipment use may result in erosion, siltation, or discharge of fuels or other construction equipment-related substances into the seasonal wetlands. Discharge of sediment or hazardous materials may impact potentially jurisdictional features within the Project Area.

In the absence of suitable mitigation measures, any impacts to seasonal wetland would be potentially significant. The proposed Project shall implement Conditions 3 and 12 of the SCVHCP 19 to reduce construction impacts to steams, wetlands, and riparian habitat. These Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) conditions require avoidance of wetlands and require construction setbacks for streams and riparian area during construction. Mitigation measures, based on these conditions, are outlined below.

Mitigation for Impact BIO-01
BIO MM-1.0: Avoidance of Wetlands and Non-Wetland Waters Portions of the proposed Project slated for development are to be located away from the seasonal wetland and non-wetland waters; therefore no impacts are expected. It is recommended that any Project work be conducted more than 50 feet from the edge of the wetland or non-wetland water features, outside of the “Wetland Avoidance Buffer” (Figure 6), to provide a protective buffer. The following measures will ensure avoidance of direct impacts to wetlands and non-wetland waters during construction activity:
• The Wetland Avoidance Buffer shall be temporarily staked prior to construction, using orange construction fencing, lathe and flagging or its equivalent, by a qualified biologist to ensure that construction equipment and personnel avoid these features. • Fencing shall be erected along the outer edge of the Project Area, between the Project Area and any adjacent wetland or pond.
• Applicable avoidance and minimization measures shall be implemented during construction. To this end, all personnel working within or adjacent to the Wetland Avoidance Buffer will be trained by a qualified biologist in the avoidance and minimization measure outlined in Table 6-2 of the SCVHCP. Training materials shall be submitted to the City’s Supervising Environmental Planner upon request.

BIO MM-1.1: Avoidance of Indirect Effects to Wetlands
The site would be graded to drain in a northwest direction, away from potential jurisdictional aquatic features. Bioretention swales with catch basins would be installed in the northwest and south corners of the project site. The Project would install new storm drains, which would connect with planned storm drain lines from an adjacent project. The following measures will ensure avoidance of erosion or pollution to wetlands during construction activity:
• Appropriate erosion control measures (e.g., fiber rolls, filter fences, vegetative buffer strips) shall be used on site to reduce siltation and runoff of contaiminants into wetlands or non-wetland waters. Filter fences and mesh, if used, shall be of material that will not trap reptiles and amphibians. Erosion control blankets shall be used as a last resort because of their tendency to biodegrade slowly and trap reptiles and amphibians. • Erosion-control measures shall be placed between the wetland or pond and the outer edge of the Project site. Fiber rolls used for erosion control shall be certified as free of noxious weed seed.
• Vehicles and equipment shall be parked on pavement, existing roads, and previously disturbed area.
• No construction or maintenance vehicles shall be refuled within 200 feet of avoided wetlands and non-wetland waters unless a bermed and lined refueling area is constructed and hazardous material absorbent pads are available in the case of a spill. • Used cleaning materials (e.g., liquids) shall be disposed of safely, and if necessary, taken off site for proper disposal. Used disposable globes should be retained for safe disposal in sealed bags.
20 With the implementation of BIO MM-1.0 and BIO MM-1.1, there will be no impacts to wetlands and non-wetland waters.

Impact BIO-02: Invasive Weeds
The Project Area is located within an urban matrix in which a number of invasive weeds are known to occur. Movement of equipment to and from the site has the potential to result in the introduction or spread of invasive weeds. In the absence of suitable mitigation measures, the introduction and/or spread of invasive weeds would be considered a significant impact.

BIO MM-2.0: Containment of Invasive Weeds
With the implementation of the following measures, the introduction and spread of invasive weeds would be reduced to less than significant:
• All seeds and straw materials used on site shall be composed of weed-free rice (or similar acceptable material) straw, and all gravel and fill material shall be certified wed free. Proof of certification, in the form of a California Department of Food and Agriculture Form 66- 079 “Certificate of Quarantine Compliance,” or equivalent certification, shall be submittd to the City’s Supervising Environmental Planner prior to issuance of a grading permit. • During construction, vehicles and equipment shall be washed (including wheels, undercarriages, and bumpers) before leaving and after entering the Project footprint.

Vehicles shall be cleaned at existing construction yards or legal operating car washes. • Following construction, temporary impact zones or any disturbed ground that will not be under hardscape, landscaped, or maintained, shall be reseeded with a native seed mixture. Seed mixtures applied for erosion control shall be composed of native species appropriate for the site in order to provide long-term erosion control and slow colonization by invasive non-native plants.

5.3.2 Special-status Plant Species
Potential Impact BIO-03: Potential Impacts to Special-status Plant Species Two special-status plant species have a moderate or high potential to occur in the Project Area based on the availability of suitable habitat, the presence of associated plant species, and the proximity to documented occurrences. The timing of the site visit was not sufficient to identify these species based on their documented bloom periods. None of the special-status plant species covered under the SCVHCP have potential to occur in the Project Area.

The majority of the Project Area has either already been graded or is located within the Wetland Avoidance Buffer, in which no impacts are to occur. However, Congdon’s tarplant and San Joaquin spearscale could occur in mesic areas of ruderal herbaceous vegetation outside of the Wetland Avoidance Buffer, and these plants would be impacted by construction activities such as grading and hardscaping. Congdon’s tarplant and San Joaquin spearscale are CRPR 1B species, meaning that they are considered extinct, rare, threatened or endangered throughout their range in California, and impacts to them must be considered under CEQA. If present in the Project Area, impacts to the aforementioned special-status plant species could be significant under CEQA (criterion A).
21 BIO MM-3.0: Potential Impacts to Special-status Plant Species Protocol-level surveys shall be conducted in non-developed areas during the documented bloom period of Congdon’s tarplant (May to November) and San Joaquin spearscale (April to October) to determine the presence of these species. Survey timing may fluctuate based on blooming periods of appropriate reference site locations.

If special-status plant surveys result in negative findings, no impacts would occur, and no mitigation would be required. Similarly, if special-status plant surveys find either species are observed within the Project Area but can be avoided, these plants would not be impacted, and no mitigation would be required. However, if either species is found to be present, the implementation of following measures would reduce Project impact on special-status plants to less than significant:
• If a population of Congdon’s tarplant or San Joaquin spearscale is identified in the Project footprint and cannot be avoided, mitigation for loss of individuals shall be conducted.

Mitigation shall be achieved by establishing a new population in the seasonal wetland and ruderal herbaceous vegetation that occur within the Wetland Avoidance Buffer. This area shall not be developed by the project and contains suitable habitat types for establishing a new population. Mitigation shall be a 1:1 ratio of plant establishment, on an acreage basis.
• Annual monitoring shall include quantitative sampling of the Congdon’s tarplant or San Joaquin spearscale population to determine the number of germinated/surviving plants.

This monitoring shall continue annually or until success criteria have been met; once annual monitoring has documented that a self-sustaining population has been successfully established on site, this mitigation measure shall be determined to have been met.
• Establishment of the plant population shall be subject to a Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (HMMP), prepared by a qualified biologist. The HMMP shall be submitted to the City’s Supervising Environmental Planner for review and approval prior to the start of construction.

5.3.3 Special-status Wildlife Species
Of the 42 special-status wildlife species known to occur in the greater vicinity of the Project Area, four were determined to have moderate or high potential to occur or are present in the Project Area. Impact avoidance and minimization recommendations are discussed below.

Impact BIO-04: Nesting Birds
No special-status birds were observed within the Project Area during the site assessment. Two special-status bird species without species-specific guidance have a moderate potential to occur in the Project Area and include: white-tailed kite and northern harrier.

None of the bird species listed above are state or federally listed as endangered, threatened or candidates for listing. White-tailed kite is listed as a California fully protected species, while northern harrier is a CDFW Species of Special Concern (SSC). These designations require extra consideration for buffer zones around active nests, but otherwise require protection and surveys to be completed in the same manner as other species protected under the MBTA and CFGC. If nesting birds are present during construction, they may be impacted directly or indirectly by operation of equipment, increased noise, and increased human presence. Impacts to common 22 native nesting birds and the aforementioned special-status birds would be considered a significant impact under CEQA.

BIO MM-4.0: Nesting Bird Mitigation Measure
For the protection of special-status birds and native nesting birds protected by the MBTA and CFGC, future Project activities shall occur outside of the nesting season from September 1 – January 31, to the extent feasible.

If working outside of the nesting season is not possible, and project activities are initiated during the nesting season (February 1 – August 31), a qualified wildlife biologist shall conduct a nesting bird survey no more than 14 days prior to the start of Project activities. If no active nests are identified during the surveys, no impacts will occur to birds and work will progress without restriction. If active nests are identified, a no-disturbance buffer around the nest shall be implemented to avoid impacts to nesting birds. Buffers will be determined by a qualified biologist, and typically range from 25 feet to 500 feet depending on the species, nest location, and protection status of that species. After an active nest is determined to no longer be active, because of young fledging or predation, the buffer around the nest shall be removed and work shall progress without restriction. With the implementation of these measures, the Project will have no impact on nesting and/or protected birds.

Impact BIO-05: Burrowing Owl
Although ground squirrels are not active on the Project Area, burrow surrogates that may become occupied by burrowing owls exist in crevices in stockpiles and manmade culverts adjacent to water features. Burrowing owl is common in the vicinity of the Project Area, and may disperse through the Project Area or potentially use it as wintering or breeding habitat. Burrowing owl is a CDFW SSC, and is therefore given special considerations with regards to no-work buffers and any actions that could exclude the species from suitable or occupied habitat. Burrowing owls that could be present on the Project Area could be directly harmed if burrows or burrow surrogate structures are graded, excavated, or otherwise disassembled. Any impacts to burrowing owls or occupied burrows as a result of Project activities would be considered a significant impact under CEQA.

BIO MM-5.0: Burrowing Owl Pre-Construction Surveys
Work on the Project Area shall be preceded by a pre-construction survey focused on detecting burrowing owl. Burrowing owl surveys should be conducted in accordance with the CDFW Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (2012), and often consist of a minimum of two (2) surveys that are conducted within14 days and then 24-48 hours of work start to ensure burrowing owl absence. If burrowing owl is determined to be present, avoidance buffers of up to 500 feet may be instituted around occupied burrows until such time as the burrow becomes unoccupied through natural processes. Burrowing owl are not known to currently occupy the Project Area and suitable burrows or burrow surrogates within the Project Area are minimal. Although unlikely, should occupied burrows be unavoidable and passive exclusion be necessary, a Relocation Plan would be developed and follow guidelines set forth in the CDFW Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFW 2012). Guidelines include number of owls to be relocated, an analysis of impacts caused by relocation activities, identification of adjacent burrowing owl habitat, and any additional recommendations for minimization of impacts or post-relocation monitoring. Avoidance of occupied burrows as determined through pre-construction surveys and, if necessary, preparation and implementation of a Relocation Plan, will cause the Project to have no impact on burrowing owl.
23 Impact BIO-06: Bird collision risk with structures
The Project Area is in the vicinity of known avian breeding and migratory habitat. Building features, most often those associated with lighting or glass components (i.e. glazing), can attract birds from these nearby habitats and cause mortality in the form of collisions resulting from confusion. Any impacts to local or migrating birds resulting from building design features that are considered hazardous would be considered a significant impact under CEQA.

BIO MM-6.1: Bird-safe building design
In accordance with the San Jose Downtown Design Guidelines Section 4.4.2b (“Bird Safety”) and MM BIO-6.1 of the TopGolf @ Terra Project Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND, File no.

PDC16-013, GPT16-001), building designs shall be adjusted as needed to comply with guidelines in the aforementioned documents. General examples of potential plan alterations include:
• Reducing or treating of glazed surfaces;
• Controls on timing of decorative lighting;
• Elimination of glazed railings or “transparent corners”, and; • Reducing building features that may channel flight paths during migratory periods.

Bird-safe design review was conducted for this Project by a WRA avian biologist, the results of which are included in Appendix E. This design review details the level of compliance of current Project plans with the MND and the San Jose Downtown Design Guidelines, and includes recommendations for reducing potential impacts where they exist. With the incorporation of design changes recommended in Appendix E, the impact to local and migratory birds resulting from potential collisions with structures will be reduced to a less than significant level. 24 6.0 REFERENCES
Baldwin, BG, DH Goldman, DJ Keil, R Patterson, TJ Rosatti, and DH Wilken (eds.). 2012. The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, 2nd Edition. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
[CDFG] California Department of Fish and Game. Environmental Services Division (ESD). 1994.

A Field Guide to Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreements, Sections 1600-1607, California Fish and Game Code.
[CDFW] California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2012. Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation.
[CDFW] California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2014. Essential Connectivity Areas – California Essential Habitat Connectivity. Biogeographic Data Branch.

Accessed December 2019.
[CDFW] California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2019a. Natural Diversity Database, Wildlife and Habitat Data Analysis Branch. Sacramento. Accessed December 2019. [CDFW] California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2019b. California Natural Community List.

Biogeographic Data Branch.Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program, Sacramento, CA. Accessed December 2019.
[CNPS] California Native Plant Society. 2019a. A Manual of California Vegetation, Online Edition.

California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA. http://www.cnps.org/cnps/vegetation/.

Accessed December 2019.
[CNPS] California Native Plant Society. 2019b. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants.

California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, California. Available at:
www.cnps.org/inventory. Accessed December 2019.
[CSRL] California Soil Resources Lab. 2019. Online Soil Survey. Available at:
http://casoilresource.lawr.ucdavis.edu/drupal. Accessed December 2019. [City] City of San Jose. 2006. Post-Construction Urban Runoff Management. Council Policy.

Policy Number 6-29. Effective Date: February 3, 1998. Revised August, 15, 2006. [City] City of San Jose. 2011. Envision San Jose 2040. General Plan. Adopted November 1, 2011.
[City] City of San Jose. 2016. Riparian Corridor Protection and Bird-Safe Design. Council Policy.

Policy Number 6-34. Effective Date: August 23, 2016.

County of Santa Clara. 2012. Final Santa Clara Valley Habitat Plan. August. Prepared by ICF International. Prepared for: City of Gilroy, City of Morgan Hill, City of San Jose, County of Santa Clara, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, Santa Clara Valley Water District.

DeGroot, D.S. 1927. The California clapper rail: its nesting habits, enemies and habitat. Condor 29(6): 259-270.
25 Dunk, JR. 1995. White-tailed Kite (Elanus leucurus), The Birds of North America Online (A Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology. http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/178.

Accessed December 2019.

Eddleman, W. R and C. J. Conway. 1998. Clapper Rail (Rallus longirostris). In: The Birds of North America, No. 340. A. Poole and F. Gill, eds. The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, and the American Ornithologists’ Union, Washington, D.C.

Eddleman, W.R., R.E. Flores and M. Legare. 1994. Black Rail (Laterallus jamaicensis), The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online:
http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/123.

Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Department of the Army, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi 39180-0631.

Evens, J. and G. Page. 1983. The ecology of rail populations at Corte Madera Ecological Preserve with recommendations for management. Report prepared for the Marin Audubon Society. 62 pp.

Fisler, GF. 1965. Adaptations and speciation in harvest mice of the marshes of San Francisco Bay. University of California Publications in Zoology 77: 1-108.

Google Earth. 2019. Aerial Imagery 1993-2019. Accessed December 2019.

Hamilton III, WJ and RJ Meese. 2006. Habitat and population characteristics of Tricolored Blackbird colonies in California. 2005 final report. U.C. Davis for California Department. of Fish and Game.

Harvey, T. E. 1988. Breeding biology of the California clapper rail in South San Francisco Bay.

Transactions of the Western Section of the Wildlife Society 24: 98-104.

Harvey, T. E. 1980. A breeding season survey of the California clapper rail (Rallus longirostns obsoletus) in South San Francisco Bay. San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge, Newark, California.

Jepson Flora Project (eds.). 2019. Jepson eFlora. http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/IJM.html. Accessed December 2019.

Lichvar, RW, DL Banks, WN Kirchner, and NC Melvin. 2016. The National Wetland Plant List:
2016 wetland ratings. Phytoneuron 2016-30: 1-17.Meese, R.J., E.C. Beedy and W.J.

Hamilton, III. 2014. Tricolored Blackbird (Agelaius tricolor), The Birds of North America Online (A Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/423. [NETR] Nationwide Environmental Title Research. 2019. Historic Aerials. http://www.historicaerials.com/; Most recently accessed: December 2019.

NatureServe. 2019. NatureServe Conservation Status.
http://explorer.natureserve.org/ranking.htm. Accessed December 2019. 26 [NRCS] Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2019. NRCS Hydric Soils List. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcseprd1316620.html.

Accessed December 2019.

Poulin, Ray, L. D. Todd, E. A. Haug, B. A. Millsap and M. S. Martell. 2011. Burrowing Owl (Athene cunicularia), The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online:
http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/061doi:10.2173/bna.61 Shellhammer, H.S., Jackson, R., Davilla, W., Gilroy, A.M., Harvey, H.T., and Simons, L. 1982.

Habitat Preferences of Salt Marsh Harvest Mice (Reithrodontomys raviventris). The Wasmann Journal of Biology. Vol: 40(1-2). pp. 102-144.

Spautz, H., N. Nur, and D. Stralberg. 2005. California Black Rail (Laterallus jamaicensis coturniculus) Distribution and Abundance in Relation to Habitat and Landscape Features in the San Francisco Bay Estuary. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR191: 465-468.

Shuford, WD, and Gardali, T, eds. 2008. California Bird Species of Special Concern: A ranked assessment of species, subspecies, and distinct populations of birds of immediate conservation concern in California. Studies of Western Birds 1. Western Field Ornithologists, Camarillo, California, and CDFG, Sacramento.

Stebbins, RC. 2003. A Field Guide to Western Reptiles and Amphibians, 3rd Edition. The Peterson Field Guide Series, Houghton Mifflin Company, New York.

Sustaita, D, L Barthman-Thompson, P Quickert, L Patterson, and S Estrella. 2005. Annual Salt Marsh Harvest Mouse Demography and Habitat Use in Suisun Marsh Conservation Areas.

Presentation at the CALFED Science Conference.

Sustaita, D, PF Quickert, L Patterson, L Barthman-Thompson, S Estrella. 2011. Salt Marsh Harvest Mouse Demography and Habitat Use in the Suisun Marsh, California. The Journal of Wildlife Management 75(6): 1498-1507.

Thomson, RC, AN Wright, and HB Shaffer. 2016. California Amphibian and Reptile Species of Special Concern. Co-published by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and University of California Press. Oakland, California.
[USDA] United States Department of Agriculture. 2018. Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States: A Guide for Identifying and Delineating Hydric Soils, Version 8.2. L.M.

Vasilas, G.W. Hurt, and J.F. Berkowitz (eds.). Natural Resources Conservation Service.

In cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils, Fort Worth, TX. [USFWS] 2010. Salt marsh harvest mouse (Reithrodontomys raviventris) 5-Year Review:

Summary and Evaluation. Sacramento, California. 49 pp. February 16. [USFWS] US Fish and Wildlife Service. 2013. Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California. Sacramento, California. xviii + 605 pp. [USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2019a. National Wetlands Inventory website. U.S.

Department of the Interior, USFWS, Washington D.C. http://www.fws.gov/nwi. Accessed December 2019.
27 [USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2019b. Information for Conservation and Planning Database. https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/. Accessed December 2019. [USGS] U.S. Geological Survey. 2018a. Calveras Reservoir 7.5-minute quadrangle. [USGS] U.S. Geological Survey. 2018b. Cupertino 7.5-minute quadrangle. [USGS] U.S. Geological Survey. 2018c. La Costa Valley 7.5-minute quadrangle. [USGS] U.S. Geological Survey. 2018d. Milpitas 7.5-minute quadrangle. [USGS] U.S. Geological Survey. 2018e. Mountain View 7.5-minute quadrangle. [USGS] U.S. Geological Survey. 2018f. Newark 7.5-minute quadrangle. [USGS] U.S. Geological Survey. 2018g. Niles 7.5-minute quadrangle. [USGS] U.S. Geological Survey. 2018h. San Jose East 7.5-minute quadrangle. [USGS] U.S. Geological Survey. 2018i. San Jose West 7.5-minute quadrangle. [WBWG] Western Bat Working Group. 2019. Species Accounts. http://www.wbwg.org/speciesinfo/species_accounts/species_accounts.html. Accessed December 2019.

Zeiner, DC, WF Laudenslayer Jr., KE Mayer, and M White. 1990. California's Wildlife, Volume I-III: Amphibians and Reptiles, Birds, Mammals. California Statewide Wildlife Habitat Relationships System, California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento.

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

APPENDIX A

FIGURES
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Path: L:\Acad 2000 Files\29000\29259\GIS\ArcMap\Location_20191216.mxd Sources: National Geographic, WRA | Prepared By: mweidenbach, 1/21/2020 Project Area
View Extent
Alviso Hotel
Biological Resources Assessment
Santa Clara County, California
0 1 2
Miles
Figure 1. Project Area Location
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
166
W
Path: L:\Acad 2000 Files\29000\29259\GIS\ArcMap\Soils_20200121.mxd Sources: Esri World Imagery, SSURGO, WRA | Prepared By: mweidenbach, 1/21/2020 Alviso Hotel
Biological Resources Assessment
Santa Clara County, California
0 100 200
Feet
Figure 2. Project Area Soils
Project Area (6.23 ac)
Soil Types
166: Campbell silt loam, 0 to 2
percent slopes, protected
W: Water
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Path: L:\Acad 2000 Files\29000\29259\GIS\ArcMap\BioComms_20200121.mxd Alviso Hotel
Biological Resources Assessment
Santa Clara County, California
0 100 200
Feet
Sources: Esri World Imagery, WRA | Prepared By: mweidenbach, 1/21/2020 Figure 3. Biological Communities Present within the Project Area Project Area (6.23 ac)
Biological Communities:

Sensitive
Seasonal Wetland (0.16 ac)
Non-wetland Waters (0.58 ac)
Non-Sensitive
Ruderal Herbaceous (2.49 ac)
Developed (3.00 ac)
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
1 1
1 2
3 3
4 5
6 6
6 6 6
6 6
6 6
6 6
6 7
7 7
7 7
7 7
8 9
9 9
9 10
11 12 12
13 14
14 15
15 15
15 Path: L:\Acad 2000 Files\29000\29259\GIS\ArcMap\CNDDB_Plants_20191216.mxd

1. alkali milk-vetch

2. arcuate bush-mallow

3. brittlescale

4. California alkali grass

5. California seablite

6. Congdon's tarplant

7. Contra Costa goldfields

8. hairless popcornflower

9. Hoover's button-celery

10. lesser saltscale

11. Point Reyes salty bird's-beak

12. prostrate vernal pool navarretia

13. robust spineflower

14. saline clover

15. San Joaquin spearscale
Project Area
5-mile Buffer
Alviso Hotel
Biological Resources Assessment
Santa Clara County, California
0 1 2
Miles
Figure 4. Special-Status Plant Species
within 5-miles of the Project Area
Sources: National Geographic, CNDDB Oct 2019, WRA | Prepared By: mweidenbach, 1/21/2020 This Page Intentionally Left Blank
1 1
1 1
2 2
2 2
2 2 2
2 2 2
2 2
2 2 2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 3 3
3 3
3 3
4 3
5 5
5 6
6 6
6 6
6 7
8 9
10 11
11 12
13 14
15 15
15 15
15 15
15 15
15 15
15 15
15 15
15 15
16 16
17 17
17 17
17 17
18 19
20 20
20 20
21 21
21 21
22 23
23 23
23 24
24 24
24 25
26 26
27 27
27 Path: L:\Acad 2000 Files\29000\29259\GIS\ArcMap\CNDDB_Wildlife_20191216.mxd

1. Alameda song sparrow

2. burrowing owl

3. California black rail

4. California least tern

5. California Ridgway's rail

6. California tiger salamander

7. Crotch bumble bee

8. great blue heron

9. hoary bat

10. longfin smelt

11. California brackishwater snail

12. northern California legless lizard

13. northern harrier

14. obscure bumble bee

15. salt-marsh harvest mouse

16. salt-marsh wandering shrew

17. saltmarsh common yellowthroat

18. steelhead - central California coast DPS

19. Swainson's hawk

20. tricolored blackbird

21. vernal pool tadpole shrimp

22. western bumble bee

23. western pond turtle

24. western snowy plover

25. western yellow-billed cuckoo

26. white-tailed kite

27. yellow rail
Project Area
5-mile Buffer
Alviso Hotel
Biological Resources Assessment
Santa Clara County, California
0 1 2
Miles
Figure 5. Special-Status Wildlife Species
within 5-miles of the Project Area
Sources: National Geographic, CNDDB Oct 2019, WRA | Prepared By: mweidenbach, 1/21/2020 This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Path: L:\Acad 2000 Files\29000\29259\GIS\ArcMap\Impact_20200114.mxd Alviso Hotel Biological Resources Assessment
Santa Clara County, California
0 100 200
F±eet
Figure 6. Project Footprint
Sources: Esri World Imagery, WRA | Prepared By: pkobylarz, 4/26/2021 Project Area (6.23 ac)
Project Footprint (3.06 ac)
Top of Bank
100ft TOB Setback
Wetland Avoidance Buffer (2.14 ac.)
Plan Details
Biological Communities:

Sensitive
Seasonal Wetland (0.16 ac)
Non-wetland Waters (0.58 ac)
Non-Sensitive
Ruderal Herbaceous (2.49 ac)
Developed (3.00 ac)
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

APPENDIX B

LIST OF OBSERVED PLANT AND WILDLIFE SPECIES
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
B-1
Appendix B-1. Plant Species Observed in the Project Area.

Scientific Name Common Name Form Wetland
Status*
Atriplex prostrata Fat-hen annual herb FACW
Avena barbata Slim oat annual, perennial
grass -
Avena fatua Wildoats annual grass -
Baccharis pilularis ssp.
consanguinea Coyote brush shrub -
Bellis perennis English lawn daisy perennial herb -
Brassica nigra Black mustard annual herb -
Bromus catharticus Rescue grass annual, perennial
grass -
Bromus diandrus Ripgut brome annual grass -
Bromus hordeaceus Soft chess annual grass FACU
Capsella bursa-pastoris Shepherd's purse annual herb FACU Carduus pycnocephalus ssp.
pycnocephalus Italian thistle annual herb -
Cerastium glomeratum Large mouse ears annual herb UPL
Conium maculatum Poison hemlock perennial herb FACW
Cynodon dactylon Bermuda grass perennial grass FACU
Distichlis spicata Salt grass perennial grass FAC
Dittrichia graveolens Stinkwort annual herb -
Elymus triticoides Beardless wild rye perennial grass FAC Erodium cicutarium Coastal heron's bill annual herb -
Erodium moschatum Whitestem filaree annual herb -
Euthamia occidentalis Western goldenrod perennial herb FACW Festuca bromoides Brome fescue annual grass FACU
Festuca myuros Rattail sixweeks grass annual grass FACU Festuca perennis Italian rye grass annual, perennial
grass
FAC
Ficus carica Common fig tree FACU
Foeniculum vulgare Fennel perennial herb -
Frankenia salina Alkali heath perennial herb FACW
Fumaria sp. Fumitory Annual herb -
B-2
Scientific Name Common Name Form Wetland
Status1
Geranium dissectum Wild geranium annual herb -
Heliotropium curassavicum var.
oculatum Seaside heliotrope perennial herb FACU
Helminthotheca echioides Bristly ox-tongue annual, perennial herb FAC
Hirschfeldia incana Short-podded mustard perennial herb - Hordeum brachyantherum Meadow barley perennial grass FACW Hordeum marinum ssp.
gussoneanum Barley annual grass FAC
Hordeum murinum Foxtail barley annual grass FACU
Lactuca serriola Prickly lettuce annual herb FACU
Lepidium latifolium Perennial pepperweed perennial herb FAC Malva nicaeensis Bull mallow annual herb -
Malvella leprosa Alkali mallow perennial herb FACU
Marrubium vulgare White horehound perennial herb FACU
Matricaria discoidea Pineapple weed annual herb FACU
Medicago polymorpha California burclover annual herb FACU Melilotus indicus Annual yellow sweetclover annual herb FACU Nicotiana glauca Tree tobacco tree, shrub FAC
Olea europaea Olive tree, shrub -
Pinus sp. Pine Tree -
Plantago coronopus Cut leaf plantain annual herb FAC
Plantago lanceolata Ribwort perennial herb FAC
Polypogon monspeliensis Annual beard grass annual grass FACW Pseudognaphalium luteoalbum Jersey cudweed annual herb FAC Raphanus sativus Radish annual, biennial
herb -
Rhamnus alaternus Italian buckthorn shrub FACU
Rubus armeniacus Himalayan blackberry shrub FAC
Rumex crispus Curly dock perennial herb FAC
Salicornia pacifica Pickleweed perennial herb OBL
Sherardia arvensis Field madder annual herb -
B-3
Scientific Name Common Name Form Wetland
Status1
Silybum marianum Milk thistle annual, perennial
herb -
Solanum cf. nigrum Nightshade annual herb FACU
Sonchus asper ssp. asper Sow thistle annual herb FAC
Sonchus oleraceus Sow thistle annual herb UPL
Stipa miliacea var. miliacea Smilo grass perennial grass - Taraxacum sp. Dandelion perennial herb FACU
Tragopogon porrifolius Salsify perennial herb -
Trifolium repens White clover perennial herb FACU
Vicia sativa Spring vetch annual herb, vine FACU
Washingtonia robusta Washington fan palm tree FACW
All species identified using the Jepson eFlora [Jepson Flora Project (eds.) 2019]; nomenclature follows Jepson eFlora [Jepson Flora Project (eds.) 2019]
* Wetland Status: National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands, Arid West Region (Lichvar et al. 2016) OBL: Almost always a hydrophyte, rarely in uplands
FACW: Usually a hydrophyte, but occasionally found in uplands FAC: Commonly either a hydrophyte or non-hydrophyte
FACU: Occasionally a hydrophyte, but usually found in uplands UPL: Rarely a hydrophyte, almost always in uplands
NL: Rarely a hydrophyte, almost always in uplands
NI: No information; not factored during wetland delineation B-4
Appendix B-2. Wildlife Species Observed in the Project Area.

Scientific Name Common Name
Anas platyrhynchos mallard
Branta canadensis Canada goose
Calypte anna Anna’s hummingbird
Carpodacus mexicanus house finch
Cathartes aura turkey vulture
Charadrius vociferus killdeer
Corvus brachyrhynchos American crow
Hirundinidae sp. swallow
Sayornis nigricans black phoebe
Zonotrichia leucophrys white-crowned sparrow

APPENDIX C

POTENTIAL FOR SPECIAL-STATUS PLANT AND WILDLIFE SPECIES

TO OCCUR IN THE PROJECT AREA
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
C-1
Appendix C. Potential for Special-status Species to Occur in the Project Area. List compiled from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Natural Diversity Database (CDFW 2019a), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Information for Planning and Conservation Database (USFWS 2019b), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Threatened and Endangered Species Lists, and California Native Plant Society Electronic Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (CNPS 2019b) for the Milpitas, Mountain View, Newark, Niles, La Costa Valley, Calaveras Reservoir, San Jose East, San Jose West, and Cupertino USGS 7.5' quadrangles (USGS 2018a-i).

SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
PLANTS
Santa Clara thorn-mint Rank 4.2 Chaparral (often
serpentine), cismontane
woodland, coastal scrub.

Elevation ranges from 260
to 3935 feet (80 to 1200
meters). Blooms Mar-Jun.

No Potential. The Project
Area does not contain
chaparral, cismontane
woodland, or coastal scrub
habitats or serpentine
substrate.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

California androsace Rank 4.2 Chaparral, cismontane
woodland, coastal scrub,
meadows and seeps,
pinyon and juniper
woodland, valley and
foothill grassland.

Elevation ranges from 490
to 4280 feet (150 to 1305
meters). Blooms Mar-Jun.

Unlikely. The Project
Area does not contain
chaparral, cismontane
woodland coastal scrub,
meadows and seeps, or
pinyon and juniper
woodland. The Project
Area has been heavily
altered and disturbed by
historic and modern land
management activities
(e.g. agriculture, grading,
levee construction, golfing
facility) and is very weedy;
as a result, it provides poor
quality habitat for and is
unlikely to support this
species.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-2
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
alkali milk-vetch Rank 1B.2 Playas, valley and foothill grassland (adobe clay),
vernal pools. Elevation
ranges from 0 to 195 feet
(1 to 60 meters). Blooms
Mar-Jun.

No Potential. The Project
Area does not contain
playa or vernal pool
habitats or adobe clay
substrate.

No further action
recommended for this
species.
brittlescale Rank 1B.2 Chenopod scrub, meadows
and seeps, playas, valley
and foothill grassland,
vernal pools. Elevation
ranges from 0 to 1050 feet
(1 to 320 meters). Blooms
Apr-Oct.

Unlikely. The Project Area
does not contain chenopod
scrub, meadows and
seeps, playas or venal pool
habitats. The Project Area
has been heavily altered
and disturbed by historic
and modern land
management activities
(e.g. agriculture, grading,
levee construction, golfing
facility) and is very weedy;
as a result, it provides poor
quality habitat for and is
unlikely to support this
species
No further action
recommended for this
species.
lesser saltscale Rank 1B.1 Chenopod scrub, playas,
valley and foothill
grassland. Elevation
ranges from 45 to 655 feet
(15 to 200 meters). Blooms
May-Oct.

No Potential. The Project
Area does not contain
chenopod scrub and playa
habitats. In addition, this
species is known to occur
in sandy soils (CDFW
2018), which are not
present within the Project
Area.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-3
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
big-scale balsamroot Rank 1B.2 Chaparral, cismontane
woodland, valley and
foothill grassland. Elevation
ranges from 145 to 5100
feet (45 to 1555 meters).

Blooms Mar-Jun.

Unlikely. The Project Area
does not contain chaparral
or cismontane woodland
habitats. The Project Area
has been heavily altered
and disturbed by historic
and modern land
management activities
(e.g. agriculture, grading,
levee construction, golfing
facility) and is very weedy;
as a result, it provides poor
quality habitat for and is
unlikely to support this
species. In addition, this
species is often known
from serpentine and
volcanic-influenced
substrates, which are not
present within the Project
Area.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

Brewer's calandrinia Rank 4.2 Chaparral, coastal scrub.

Elevation ranges from 30
to 4005 feet (10 to 1220
meters). Blooms (Jan)MarJun.

Unlikely. The Project Area
does not contain chaparral
or coastal scrub habitats.

No further action
recommended for this
species.
chaparral harebell Rank 1B.2 Chaparral (rocky, usually
serpentine). Elevation
ranges from 900 to 4100
feet (275 to 1250 meters).

Blooms May-Jun.

No Potential. The Project
Area does not chaparral
habitat or rocky or
serpentine substrates and
is outside the known
elevation range for this
species.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-4
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
Congdon's tarplant Rank 1B.1 Valley and foothill
grassland (alkaline).

Elevation ranges from 0 to
755 feet (0 to 230 meters).

Blooms May-Oct(Nov).

High Potential. This
disturbance-adapted
species has moderate
potential to occur in mesic,
ruderal herbaceous areas
and along the fringe of the
non-wetland waters
feature.

Protocol-level surveys
should be conducted for
this species during the
documented bloom period
(May to November), or
when plants are readily
identifiable.

Point Reyes bird's-beak Rank 1B.2 Marshes and swamps
(coastal salt). Elevation
ranges from 0 to 35 feet (0
to 10 meters). Blooms JunOct.

Unlikely. This species is
known tidally influenced
salt marsh habitat, which is
not present within the
Project Area.

No further action
recommended for this
species.
robust spineflower FE, Rank 1B.1 Chaparral (maritime),
cismontane woodland
(openings), coastal dunes,
coastal scrub. Elevation
ranges from 5 to 985 feet
(3 to 300 meters). Blooms
Apr-Sep.

No Potential. The Project
Area does not contain
chaparral, cismontane
woodland, coastal dunes,
or coastal scrub habitats.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

Mt. Hamilton fountain thistle Rank 1B.2 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, valley and
foothill grassland. Elevation
ranges from 325 to 2920
feet (100 to 890 meters).

Blooms (Feb)Apr-Oct.

No Potential. This
species is known to occur
only on serpentine
substrate (CDFW 2018),
which is not present within
the Project Area.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

Santa Clara red ribbons Rank 4.3 Chaparral, cismontane
woodland. Elevation
ranges from 295 to 4920
feet (90 to 1500 meters).

Blooms (Apr)May-Jun(Jul).

No Potential. The Project
Area does not contain
chaparral or cismontane
woodland habitats.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-5
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
Lewis' clarkia Rank 4.3 Broadleafed upland forest,
closed-cone coniferous
forest, chaparral,
cismontane woodland,
coastal scrub. Elevation
ranges from 95 to 3920
feet (30 to 1195 meters).

Blooms May-Jul.

No Potential. The Project
Area does not contain
broadleafed upland forest,
closed-cone coniferous
forest, chaparral,
cismontane woodland, or
coastal scrub habitats.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

San Francisco collinsia Rank 1B.2 Closed-cone coniferous forest, coastal scrub.

Elevation ranges from 95
to 820 feet (30 to 250
meters). Blooms (Feb)MarMay.

No Potential. The Project
Area does not contain
closed-cone coniferous
forest or coastal scrub
habitats.

No further action
recommended for this
species.
clustered lady's-slipper Rank 4.2 Lower montane coniferous forest, north coast
coniferous forest. Elevation
ranges from 325 to 7990
feet (100 to 2435 meters).

Blooms Mar-Aug.

No Potential. The Project
Area does not contain
lower montane coniferous
forest or North Coast
coniferous forest habitats.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

Hospital Canyon larkspur Rank 1B.2 Chaparral (openings), cismontane woodland
(mesic), coastal scrub.

Elevation ranges from 635
to 3595 feet (195 to 1095
meters). Blooms Apr-Jun.

No Potential. The Project
Area does not contain
chaparral, cismontane
woodland or coastal scrub
habitats and is outside the
elevation range for this
species.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-6
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
western leatherwood Rank 1B.2 Broadleafed upland forest, closed-cone coniferous
forest, chaparral,
cismontane woodland,
north coast coniferous
forest, riparian forest,
riparian woodland.

Elevation ranges from 80
to 1395 feet (25 to 425
meters). Blooms JanMar(Apr).

No Potential. The Project
Area does not contain
broadleafed upland forest,
closed-cone coniferous
forest, chaparral,
cismontane woodland,
North Coast coniferous
forest, riparian forest, or
riparian woodland habitats.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

Santa Clara Valley dudleya FE, Rank 1B.1 Cismontane woodland, valley and foothill
grassland. Elevation
ranges from 195 to 1495
feet (60 to 455 meters).

Blooms Apr-Oct.

No Potential. This species
occurs on rocky outcrops
(CDFW 2018), which are
not present within the
Project Area.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

Jepson's woolly sunflower Rank 4.3 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, coastal scrub.

Elevation ranges from 655
to 3365 feet (200 to 1025
meters). Blooms Apr-Jun.

No Potential. The Project
Area does not contain
chaparral, cismontane
woodland, or coastal scrub
habitats and is outside the
elevation range for this
species.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

Hoover's button-celery Rank 1B.1 Vernal pools. Elevation ranges from 5 to 150 feet
(3 to 45 meters). Blooms
(Jun)Jul(Aug).

No Potential. The Project
Area does not contain
vernal pool habitat.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-7
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
San Joaquin spearscale Rank 1B.2 Chenopod scrub, meadows and seeps, playas, valley
and foothill grassland.

Elevation ranges from 0 to
2740 feet (1 to 835
meters). Blooms Apr-Oct.

Moderate Potential. This
disturbance-tolerant
species has moderate
potential to occur at the
edges of the non-wetland
waters feature and in the
flat, ruderal herbaceous
area adjacent to the north
of the non-wetland waters
feature.

Protocol-level surveys
should be conducted for
this species during the
documented bloom period
(April to October), or when
plants are readily
identifiable.
stinkbells Rank 4.2 Chaparral, cismontane
woodland, pinyon and
juniper woodland, valley
and foothill grassland.

Elevation ranges from 30
to 5100 feet (10 to 1555
meters). Blooms Mar-Jun.

Unlikely. The Project Area
does not contain chaparral,
cismontane woodland, or
pinyon and juniper
woodland habitats. The
Project Area has been
heavily altered and
disturbed by historic and
modern land management
activities (e.g. agriculture,
grading, levee
construction, golfing
facility) and is very weedy;
as a result, it provides poor
quality habitat for and is
unlikely to support this
species.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-8
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
fragrant fritillary Rank 1B.2 Cismontane woodland,
coastal prairie, coastal
scrub, valley and foothill
grassland. Elevation
ranges from 5 to 1345 feet
(3 to 410 meters). Blooms
Feb-Apr.

Unlikely. The Project Area
does not contain
cismontane woodland,
coastal prairie, or coastal
scrub habitats. The
Project Area has been
heavily altered and
disturbed by historic and
modern land management
activities (e.g. agriculture,
grading, levee
construction, golfing
facility) and is very weedy;
as a result, it provides poor
quality habitat for and is
unlikely to support this
species.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-9
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
Diablo helianthella Rank 1B.2 Broadleafed upland forest, chaparral, cismontane
woodland, coastal scrub,
riparian woodland, valley
and foothill grassland.

Elevation ranges from 195
to 4265 feet (60 to 1300
meters). Blooms Mar-Jun.

Unlikely. The Project Area
does not contain
broadleafed upland forest,
chaparral, cismontane
woodland, coastal scrub, or
riparian woodland habitats.

The Project Area has been
heavily altered and
disturbed by historic and
modern land management
activities (e.g. agriculture,
grading, levee
construction, golfing
facility) and is very weedy;
as a result, it provides poor
quality habitat for and is
unlikely to support this
species. In addition, this
species is usually known
from chaparral/oak
woodland interface habitat
on rocky soils (CDFW
2018), and such habitats
and substrate are not
present within the Project
Area.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

Loma Prieta hoita Rank 1B.1 Chaparral, cismontane
woodland, riparian
woodland. Elevation
ranges from 95 to 2820
feet (30 to 860 meters).

Blooms May-Jul(Aug-Oct).

No Potential. The Project
Area does not contain
chaparral, cismontane
woodland, and riparian
woodland habitats.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-10
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
coast iris Rank 4.2 Coastal prairie, lower
montane coniferous forest,
meadows and seeps.

Elevation ranges from 0 to
1970 feet (0 to 600
meters). Blooms Mar-May.

No Potential. The Project
Area does not contain
coastal prairie, lower
montane coniferous forest
or meadows and seeps
habitats.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

Contra Costa goldfields FE, Rank 1B.1 Cismontane woodland, playas (alkaline), valley
and foothill grassland,
vernal pools. Elevation
ranges from 0 to 1540 feet
(0 to 470 meters). Blooms
Mar-Jun.

Unlikely. The Project Area
does not contain
cismontane woodland,
playa, or vernal pool
habitats. The Project Area
has been heavily altered
and disturbed by historic
and modern land
management activities
(e.g. agriculture, grading,
levee construction, golfing
facility) and is very weedy;
as a result, it provides poor
quality habitat for and is
unlikely to support this
species.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-11
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
bristly leptosiphon Rank 4.2 Chaparral, cismontane
woodland, coastal prairie,
valley and foothill
grassland. Elevation
ranges from 180 to 4920
feet (55 to 1500 meters).

Blooms Apr-Jul.

Unlikely. The Project Area
does not contain chaparral,
cismontane woodland, or
coastal prairie habitats.

No further action
recommended for this
species.
serpentine leptosiphon Rank 4.2 Cismontane woodland,
coastal scrub, valley and
foothill grassland. Elevation
ranges from 390 to 3705
feet (120 to 1130 meters).

Blooms Mar-Jun.

No Potential. This
species is only known from
serpentine substrate
(CDFW 2018), which is not
present within the Project
Area.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-12
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
woolly-headed lessingia Rank 3 Broadleafed upland forest, coastal scrub, lower
montane coniferous forest,
valley and foothill
grassland. Elevation
ranges from 45 to 1000
feet (15 to 305 meters).

Blooms Jun-Oct.

Unlikely. The Project Area
does not contain
broadleafed upland forest,
coastal scrub, or lower
montane coniferous forest
habitats. This species is
known from serpentine and
upland clay substrates,
which are not present
within the Project Area.

The nearest documented
occurrence of this species
is approximately 10 miles
east of the Project Area.

No further action
recommended for this
species.
smooth lessingia Rank 1B.2 Chaparral, cismontane
woodland, valley and
foothill grassland.

Elevation ranges from 390
to 1380 feet (120 to 420
meters). Blooms (AprJun)Jul-Nov.

No Potential. This
species is only known from
serpentine substrate
(CDFW 2018), which is not
present within the Project
Area.

No further action
recommended for this
species.
arcuate bush-mallow Rank 1B.2 Chaparral, cismontane
woodland. Elevation
ranges from 45 to 1165
feet (15 to 355 meters).

Blooms Apr-Sep.

Unlikely. The Project Area
does not chaparral or
cismontane woodland
habitats.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

Hall's bush-mallow Rank 1B.2 Chaparral, coastal scrub.

Elevation ranges from 30
to 2495 feet (10 to 760
meters). Blooms (Apr)MaySep(Oct).

No Potential. The Project
Area does not contain
chaparral or coastal scrub
habitats.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-13
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
Mt. Diablo cottonweed Rank 3.2 Broadleafed upland forest, chaparral, cismontane
woodland, valley and
foothill grassland. Elevation
ranges from 145 to 2705
feet (45 to 825 meters).

Blooms Mar-May.

Unlikely. The Project Area
does not contain
broadleafed upland forest,
chaparral, or cismontane
woodland habitats. The
Project Area has been
heavily altered and
disturbed by historic and
modern land management
activities (e.g. agriculture,
grading, levee
construction, golfing
facility) and is very weedy;
as a result, it provides poor
quality habitat for and is
unlikely to support this
species.

No further action
recommended for this
species.
elongate copper moss Rank 4.3 Broadleafed upland forest, chaparral, cismontane
woodland, coastal scrub,
lower montane coniferous
forest, meadows and
seeps, subalpine
coniferous forest. Elevation
ranges from 0 to 6430 feet
(0 to 1960 meters).

No Potential. The Project
Area does not contain
broadleafed upland forest,
chaparral, cismontane
woodland, coastal scrub,
lower montane coniferous
forest, meadows and
seeps, or subalpine
coniferous forest habitats.

This species is typically
known from metamorphic
substrate in fens, and this
substrate and habitat are
not present within the
Project Area.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-14
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
San Antonio Hills monardella Rank 3 Chaparral, cismontane woodland. Elevation
ranges from 1045 to 3280
feet (320 to 1000 meters).

Blooms Jun-Aug.

No Potential. The Project
Area does not contain
chaparral or cismontane
woodland habitats and is
outside the elevation range
for this species.

No further action
recommended for this
species.
woodland woolythreads Rank 1B.2 Broadleafed upland forest (openings), chaparral
(openings), cismontane
woodland, north coast
coniferous forest
(openings), valley and
foothill grassland. Elevation
ranges from 325 to 3935
feet (100 to 1200 meters).

Blooms (Feb)Mar-Jul.

No Potential. The Project
Area does not contain
broadleafed upland forest,
chaparral, cismontane
woodland, or North Coast
coniferous forest habitats.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

Patterson's navarretia Rank 1B.3 Meadows and seeps.

Elevation ranges from 490
to 1410 feet (150 to 430
meters). Blooms MayJun(Jul).

No Potential. The Project
Area does not contain
meadows and seeps
habitat. This species is
known from serpentine
substrate (CDFW 2018),
which is not present within
the Project Area.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-15
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
prostrate vernal pool navarretia Rank 1B.1 Coastal scrub, meadows and seeps, valley and
foothill grassland (alkaline),
vernal pools. Elevation
ranges from 5 to 3970 feet
(3 to 1210 meters). Blooms
Apr-Jul.

Unlikely. The Project Area
does not contain coastal
scrub, meadows and
seeps, or vernal pool
habitats. The Project Area
has been heavily altered
and disturbed by historic
and modern land
management activities
(e.g. agriculture, grading,
levee construction, golfing
facility) and is very weedy;
as a result, it provides poor
quality habitat for and is
unlikely to support this
species.

No further action
recommended for this
species.
hairless popcornflower Rank 1A Meadows and seeps
(alkaline), marshes and
swamps (coastal salt).

Elevation ranges from 45
to 590 feet (15 to 180
meters). Blooms Mar-May.

Unlikely. The Project Area
has been heavily altered
and disturbed by historic
and modern land
management activities
(e.g. agriculture, grading,
levee construction, golfing
facility) and is very weedy;
as a result, it provides poor
quality habitat for and is
unlikely to support this
species.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-16
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
California alkali grass Rank 1B.2 Chenopod scrub,
meadows and seeps,
valley and foothill
grassland, vernal pools.

Elevation ranges from 5 to
3050 feet (2 to 930
meters). Blooms Mar-May.

No further action
recommended for this
species.
chaparral ragwort Rank 2B.2 Chaparral, cismontane
woodland, coastal scrub.

Elevation ranges from 45
to 2625 feet (15 to 800
meters). Blooms JanApr(May).

No further action
recommended for this
species.
maple-leaved checkerbloom Rank 4.2 Broadleafed upland forest, coastal prairie, coastal
scrub, north coast
coniferous forest, riparian
woodland. Elevation
ranges from 0 to 2395 feet
(0 to 730 meters). Blooms
(Mar)Apr-Aug.

No Potential. The Project
Area does not contain
broadleafed upland forest,
coastal prairie, coastal
scrub, North Coast
coniferous forest, or
riparian woodland habitats.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-17
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
long-styled sand-spurrey Rank 1B.2 Meadows and seeps,
marshes and swamps.

Elevation ranges from 0 to
835 feet (0 to 255 meters).

Blooms Feb-May(Jun).

No Potential. The Project
Area does not contain
meadows and seeps
habitat. This species is
known from serpentine
substrate (CDFW 2018),
which is not present within
the Project Area.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

Metcalf Canyon jewelflower FE, Rank 1B.1 Valley and foothill grassland (serpentine).

Elevation ranges from 145
to 2625 feet (45 to 800
meters). Blooms Apr-Jul.

No Potential. This
species is known only from
serpentine outcrops, which
are not present within the
Project Area.

No further action
recommended for this
species.
most beautiful jewelflower Rank 1B.2 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, valley and
foothill grassland. Elevation
ranges from 310 to 3280
feet (95 to 1000 meters).

Blooms (Mar)Apr-Sep(Oct).

No Potential. The Project
Area does not contain
freshwater marsh and
swamp habitat and is
outside the elevation range
for this species.

No further action
recommended for this
species.
slender-leaved pondweed Rank 2B.2 Marshes and swamps
(assorted shallow
freshwater). Elevation
ranges from 980 to 7055
feet (300 to 2150 meters).

Blooms May-Jul.

No Potential. This species
is only known from tidally
influenced marsh habitat,
which is not present within
the Project Area.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-18
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
California seablite FE, Rank 1B.1 Marshes and swamps
(coastal salt). Elevation
ranges from 0 to 50 feet (0
to 15 meters). Blooms JulOct.

No further action
recommended for this
species.
saline clover Rank 1B.2 Marshes and swamps,
valley and foothill
grassland (mesic, alkaline),
vernal pools. Elevation
ranges from 0 to 985 feet
(0 to 300 meters). Blooms
Apr-Jun.

No further action
recommended for this
species.
caper-fruited tropidocarpum Rank 1B.1 Valley and foothill grassland (alkaline hills).

Elevation ranges from 0 to
1495 feet (1 to 455
meters). Blooms Mar-Apr.

No Potential. This
species is known only from
serpentine outcrops, which
are not present within the
Project Area.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-19
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS

WILDLIFE
Mammals
pallid bat
Antrozous pallidus

SSC, WBWG
High
Found in a variety of
habitats ranging from
grasslands to mixed
forests, favoring open and
dry, rocky areas. Roost
sites include crevices in
rock outcrops and cliffs,
caves, mines, and also
hollow trees and various
manmade structures such
as bridges, barns, and
buildings (including
occupied buildings).

Roosts must protect bats
from high temperatures.

Very sensitive to
disturbance of roosting
sites.

Unlikely. The Project
Area does not provide
suitable roosting habitat for
this species. This species
may forage within the
Project Area.

No further action
recommended for this
species.
hoary bat
Lasiurus cinereus
WBWG
Medium
Prefers open forested
habitats or habitat
mosaics, with access to
trees for cover and open
areas or habitat edges for
feeding. Roosts in dense
foliage of medium to large
trees. Feeds primarily on
moths.

No Potential. The Project
Area does not contain
large trees, and is not
adjacent to forested
habitat. This species is
not expected to roost or
foraging within the Project
Area.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-20
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
long-eared myotis
Myotis evotis
WBWG
Medium
Occurs in semiarid
shrublands, sage,
chaparral, and agricultural
areas, but is usually
associated with coniferous
forests from sea level to
9000 feet. Individuals roost
under exfoliating tree bark,
and in hollow trees, caves,
mines, cliff crevices, and
rocky outcrops on the
ground. They also
sometimes roost in
buildings and under
bridges.

Unlikely. Forested habitat
for this species is not
present within the Project
Area to provide suitable
roosting habitat. This
species may occasionally
forage or migrate over the
Project Area.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

Townsend's western big-eared bat
Corynorhinus townsendii townsendii

SSC, WBWG
High
Humid coastal regions of
northern and central
California. Roost in
limestone caves, lava
tubes, mines, buildings
etc. Will only roost in the
open, hanging from walls
and ceilings. Roosting
sites limiting. Extremely
sensitive to disturbance
No Potential. The Project
Area does not contain
suitable forest habitat to
support foraging or
roosting of this species.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-21
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
salt marsh harvest mouse
Reithrodontomys raviventris
FE, SE, CFP Endemic to emergent salt
and brackish wetlands of
the San Francisco Bay
Estuary. Pickleweed
marshes are primary
habitat; also occurs in
various other wetland
communities with dense
vegetation. Does not
burrow, builds loosely
organized nests. Requires
higher areas for dryland
refugia during high tides.

Unlikely. The Project
Area contains no tidal or
brackish marsh, and is
separated from suitable
habitat by several
dispersal barriers. The
Project Area provides only
marginal upland habitat.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

San Francisco dusky-footed woodrat
Neotoma fuscipes annectens
SSC Forest habitats of
moderate canopy and
moderate to dense
understory. Also in
chaparral habitats.

Constructs nests of
shredded grass, leaves,
and other material. May
be limited by availability of
nest-building materials.

No Potential. The Project
Area and adjacent areas
do not contain densely
forested areas with litterdense understory that this
species requires
No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-22
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
salt-marsh wandering shrew
Sorex vagrans halicoetes
SSC Salt marshes of the south
arm of San Francisco Bay.

Medium high marsh 6 to 8
feet above sea level where
abundant driftwood is
scattered among
Salicornia.

Unlikely. The Project
Area contains marginal
marsh vegetation along
the shore of the nonwetland water feature in
the southern portion of the
Project Area. However,
this species requires
dense continuous tidal
marsh habitat. The
nearest documented
occurrence is less than a
mile north of the Project
Area (CDFW 2018).

No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-23
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
Birds
tricolored blackbird
Agelaius tricolor
ST Nearly endemic to
California, where it is most
numerous in the Central
Valley and vicinity. Highly
colonial, nesting in dense
aggregations over or near
freshwater in emergent
growth or riparian thickets.

Also uses flooded
agricultural fields.

Abundant insect prey near
breeding areas essential.

Unlikely. The Project
Area does not contain
dense stands of emergent
vegetation this species
requires for nesting. The
nearest documented
occurrence is 1 mile north
within the Don Edwards
San Francisco Bay
National Wildlife Refuge
(CDFW 2019).

No further action
recommended for this
species.
golden eagle
Aquila chrysaetos
BGEPA, CFP Occurs year-round in
rolling foothills, mountain
areas, sage-juniper flats,
and deserts. Cliff-walled
canyons provide nesting
habitat in most parts of
range; also nests in large
trees, usually within
otherwise open areas.

Unlikely. The Project
Area does not contain
large trees, cliff walls, or
platforms to provide
support nesting of this
species. Foraging unlikely
based on habitats present,
but could occur transiently.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-24
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
great blue heron
Ardea herodias
Breeding sites
protected by
CDFW
Year-round resident.

Nests colonially or semicolonially in tall trees and
cliffs, also sequested
terrestrial substrates.

Breeding sites usually in
close proximity to foraging
areas: marshes, lake
margins, tidal flats, and
rivers. Forages primarily
on fishes and other aquatic
prey, also smaller
terrestrial vertebrates.

Unlikely. The Project
Area does not contain
nesting substrates to
support a breeding colony,
though individuals are
likely to forage in the
nearby Guadalupe River.

No further action
recommended for this
species.
snowy egret
Egretta thula
Breeding sites
protected by
CDFW
Year-round resident.

Nests colonially, usually in
trees, at times in
sequestered beds of
dense emergent
vegetation (e.g., tules).

Rookery sites usually
situated close to foraging
areas: marshes, tidal-flats,
streams, wet meadows,
and borders of lakes.

Unlikely. The Project
Area does not contain
nesting substrates to
support a breeding colony,
though individuals are
likely to forage in the
nearby Guadalupe River.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-25
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
burrowing owl
Athene cunicularia
SSC Year-round resident and
winter visitor. Occurs in
open, dry grasslands and
scrub habitats with lowgrowing vegetation,
perches and abundant
mammal burrows. Preys
upon insects and small
vertebrates. Nests and
roosts in old mammal
burrows, most commonly
those of ground squirrels.

Moderate Potential.

Numerous occurrences for
this species are found
within one mile of the
Project Area. Though
ground squirrels and other
fossorial mammals are
largely absent from the
Project Area, the species
may utilize man-made
burrow analogs, such as
pipes and culverts, which
are present.

Pre-construction burrowing
owl surveys should be
conducted to ensure no
impacts occur to breeding
or overwintering burrowing
owls. See section 5.3.3 for
mitigation measures
specific to burrowing owl.

Swainson’s hawk
Buteo swainsoni
ST Summer resident in
Central Valley and limited
portions of the southern
California interior. Nests in
tree groves and isolated
trees in riparian and
agricultural areas,
including near buildings.

Forages in grasslands and
scrub habitats as well as
agricultural fields,
especially alfalfa. Preys on
arthropods year-round as
well as smaller vertebrates
during the breeding
season.

No Potential. This
species is not currently
known to occupy the
region of the Project Area.

The nearest documented
occurrence is 5 miles
south of the Project Area,
is from 1889, and is listed
as “possibly extirpated”
(CDFW 2019). The
Project Area additionally
does not contain trees
suitable for nesting.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-26
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
northern harrier
Circus cyaneus
SSC Year-round resident and
winter visitor. Found in
open habitats including
grasslands, prairies,
marshes and agricultural
areas. Nests on the
ground in dense
vegetation, typically near
water or otherwise moist
areas. Preys on small
vertebrates.

Moderate Potential.

Open grassland areas
within the Project Area are
limited in extent, but do
exist in proximity to the
ephemeral wetland areas.

This species may forage
on or migrate through the
Project Area.

Nesting bird surveys
should be conducted on
the Project Area to
determine whether this
species is breeding. See
section 5.3.3 for measures
specific to this and other
native avian species.
yellow rail
Coturnicops noveboracensis
SSC Summer resident in
eastern Sierra Nevada in
Mono County, breeding in
shallow freshwater
marshes and wet
meadows with dense
vegetation. Also a rare
winter visitor along the
coast and other portions of
the state. Extremely
cryptic.

Unlikely. The Project
Area does not provide the
specific marsh/meadow
habitat required by this
species.

No further action
recommended for this
species.
western snowy plover
Charadrius nivosus (alexandrines)
nivosus
FT, SSC, RP Federal listing applies only
to the Pacific coastal
population. Year-round
resident and winter visitor.

Occurs on sandy beaches,
salt pond levees, and the
shores of large alkali
lakes. Nests on the
ground, requiring sandy,
gravelly or friable soils.

No Potential. The Project
Area does not contain mud
flat or gravel bar habitats
typical of breeding areas
for this species.

Additionally no foraging
opportunities exist on the
Project Area.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-27
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
white-tailed kite
Elanus leucurus
SFP Year-round resident in
coastal and valley
lowlands with scattered
trees and large shrubs,
including grasslands,
marshes and agricultural
areas. Nests in trees, of
which the type and setting
are highly variable. Preys
on small mammals and
other vertebrates.

Moderate Potential.

Trees adjacent to the
Project Area provide
suitable nesting habitat,
and open areas for
foraging are present within
the Project Area.

Nesting bird surveys
should be conducted on
the Project Area to
determine whether this
species is breeding. See
section 5.3.3 for measures
specific to this and other
native avian species.

American peregrine falcon
Falco peregrinus anatum
FD, SD, CFP Year-round resident and
winter visitor. Occurs in a
wide variety of habitats,
though often associated
with coasts, bays, marshes
and other bodies of water.

Nests on protected cliffs
and also on man-made
structures including
buildings and bridges.

Preys on birds, especially
waterbirds. Forages
widely.

Unlikely. Nesting
substrates for this species
do not exist on the Project
Area, and would likely only
be present on distant
buildings or large power
poles.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-28
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
San Francisco (saltmarsh) common
yellowthroat
Geothlypis trichas sinuosa
SSC Resident of the San
Francisco Bay region, in
fresh and salt water
marshes. Requires thick,
continuous cover down to
water surface for foraging;
tall grasses, tule patches,
willows for nesting.

Moderate Potential. The
Project Area does not
contain dense stands of
cattails and tules to
support nesting. Suitable
habitat may exist in areas
adjacent to the Project
Area along the Guadalupe
River. The nearest
documented occurrence is
less than a half mile north
of the Project Area (CDFW
2018).

Nesting bird surveys
should be conducted on
the Project Area to
determine whether this
species is breeding. See
section 5.3.3 for measures
specific to this and other
native avian species.

Alameda song sparrow
Melospiza melodia pusillula
SSC Year-round resident of salt
marshes bordering the
south arm of San
Francisco Bay. Inhabits
primarily pickleweed
marshes; nests placed in
marsh vegetation, typically
shrubs such as gumplant.

Unlikely. The Project
Area lacks salt marsh
habitat. The nearest
documented occurrence is

0.5 mile south along the
Guadalupe River (CDFW
2019).

No further action
recommended for this
species.

California black rail
Laterallus jamaicensis coturniculus
ST, SFP Year-round resident in
marshes (saline to
freshwater) with dense
vegetation within four
inches of the ground.

Prefers larger, undisturbed
marshes that have an
extensive upper zone and
are close to a major water
source. Extremely
secretive and cryptic.

Unlikely. The Project
Area does not contain tidal
or brackish marsh.

Individuals may very
occasionally make forays
into the Project Area from
the nearby Guadalupe
River, but will not breed on
the Project Area.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-29
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
California Ridgway’s (clapper) rail
Rallus obsoletus obsoletus
FE, SE, SFP Year-round resident in tidal
marshes of the San
Francisco Bay estuary.

Requires tidal sloughs and
intertidal mud flats for
foraging, and dense marsh
vegetation for nesting and
cover. Typical habitat
features abundant growth
of cordgrass and
pickleweed. Feeds
primarily on mollusks and
crustaceans.

Unlikely. The Project
Area does not contain tidal
or brackish marsh.

Individuals may very
occasionally make forays
into the Project Area from
the nearby Guadalupe
River, but will not breed on
the Project Area.

No further action
recommended for this
species.
black skimmer
Rynchops niger
SSC Found primarily in
southern California; South
San Francisco Bay has a
small resident population.

Nests colonially on gravel
bars, low islets, and sandy
beaches
No Potential. The Project
Area and immediately
adjacent areas do not
contain gravel bars or
sandy beaches this
species requires for
nesting and foraging.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-30
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
California least tern
Sternula antillarum browni
FE, SE, CFP Summer resident along the
coast from San Francisco
Bay south to northern Baja
California; inland breeding
also very rarely occurs.

Nests colonially on barren
or sparsely vegetated
areas with sandy or
gravelly substrates near
water, including beaches,
islands, and gravel bars.

In San Francisco Bay, has
also nested on salt pond
margins.

No Potential. The Project
Area does not contain
suitable beaches, alkali
flats or any other
appropriate nesting
habitat.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-31
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
bank swallow
Riparia riparia
ST Summer resident in
riparian and other lowland
habitats near rivers, lakes
and the ocean in northern
California. Nests colonially
in excavated burrows on
vertical cliffs and bank cuts
(natural and manmade)
with fine-textured soils.

Historical nesting range in
southern and central areas
of California has been
eliminated by habitat loss.

Currently known to breed
in Siskiyou, Shasta, and
Lassen Cos., portions of
the north coast, and along
Sacramento River from
Shasta Co. south to Yolo
Co.

No Potential. The Project
Area does not contain
riparian vegetation or cliffs
this species requires for
nesting.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

Reptiles and Amphibians
Alameda whipsnake
Masticophis lateralis euryxanthus
FT, ST Inhabits chaparral and
foothill-hardwood habitats
in the eastern Bay Area.

Prefers south-facing
slopes and ravines with
rock outcroppings where
shrubs form a vegetative
mosaic with oak trees and
grasses and small
mammal burrows provide
basking and refuge.

No Potential. The Project
Area is out of this species’
range, is devoid of rock
outcroppings, and does
not contain chaparral or
foothill habitat.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-32
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
western pond turtle
Actinemys marmorata
SSC A thoroughly aquatic turtle
of ponds, marshes, rivers,
streams and irrigation
ditches with aquatic
vegetation. Require
basking sites such as
partially submerged logs,
vegetation mats, or open
mud banks, and suitable
upland habitat (sandy
banks or grassy open
fields) for egg-laying.

Unlikely. The Project
Area lacks suitable stream
and river habitat. Water
features adjacent to the
Project Area do not
possess suitable
substrates for basking or
emergent vegetation for
cover, and appear to have
very poor water quality.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

California red-legged frog
Rana draytonii
FT, SSC Lowlands and foothills in
or near permanent sources
of deep water with dense
emergent and/or
overhanging riparian
vegetation. Favors
perennial to intermittent
ponds, marshes, and
stream pools. Requires 11
to 20 weeks of continuous
inundation for larval
development. Disperses
through upland habitats
during and after rains.

Unlikely. The Project
Area does not contain
suitable habitat to support
breeding of this species.

Adjacent water features
are of poor quality and do
not provide vegetation for
cover. The nearest
documented occurrence
over 5 miles east of the
Project Area, and
significant barriers to
dispersal exist between
those and the Project Area
(CDFW 2019).

No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-33
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
California tiger salamander
Ambystoma californiense
FT, ST Inhabits grassland, oak
woodland, ruderal and
seasonal pool habitats.

Adults are fossorial and
utilize mammal burrows
and other subterranean
refugia. Breeding occurs
in vernal pools and other
seasonal water features
but also breeds in
perennially inundated
ponds, especially if nonnative predators are
absent.

No Potential. The Project
Area is separated from the
nearest known occurrence
(4 miles north of the
Project Area; CDFW 2019)
by urban development.

The Project Area is
historically marsh and
diked marsh and is outside
of the historic range for
this species.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-34
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
Santa Cruz black salamander
Aneides flavipunctatus niger
SSC Climbing salamanders of
the genus Aneides
frequent damp woodlands
and are usually found
hiding under various debris
(i.e. bark, woodrat nests,
logs). The Santa Cruz
black salamander exists
south of the San Francisco
Bay and was only recently
recognized as a separate
and protected species.

Santa Cruz black
salamander is highly
sedentary, preferring to
stay hidden under riparian
debris. Prey items include
millipedes, spiders, and
other insects (Stebbins
and McGinnis 2012).

No Potential. The Project
Area is outside of the
known breeding range of
this species.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

California giant salamander
Dicamptodon ensatus
SSC Occurs in the north-central
Coast Ranges. Moist
coniferous and mixed
forests are typical habitat;
also uses woodland and
chaparral. Adults are
terrestrial and fossorial,
breeding in cold,
permanent or semipermanent streams.

Larvae usually remain
aquatic for over a year.

No Potential. The Project
Area and adjacent areas
do not contain moist
coniferous forests.

Additionally, the Project
Area does not contain
freshwater stream habitat
to support breeding. The
nearest suitable habitat is
over 5 miles east of the
Project Area (CDFW
2019).

No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-35
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
foothill yellow-legged frog
Rana boylii
SC, SSC Found in or adjacent to
rocky streams in a variety
of habitats. Prefers partlyshaded, shallow streams
and riffles with a rocky
substrate; requires at least
some cobble-sized
substrate for egg-laying.

Needs at least 15 weeks to
attain metamorphosis.

Feeds on both aquatic and
terrestrial invertebrates.

No Potential. The Project
Area does not contain
suitable rocky stream
habitat. The nearest
documented occurrence is
over 5 miles east of the
Project Area (CDFW
2019).

No further action
recommended for this
species.
northern California legless lizard
Anniella pulchra
SSC Fossorial species,
inhabiting sandy or loose
loamy soils under relatively
sparse vegetation.

Suitable habitat includes
dunes, stream terraces,
and scrub and chaparral.

Adequate soil moisture is
essential.

No Potential. The Project
Area does not contain
loamy soils to support this
species. The nearest
documented occurrence if
7 miles south from the
Project Area (CDFW
2019).

No further action
recommended for this
species.

Fishes
Delta smelt
Hypomesus transpacificus
FT, ST Endemic to the
Sacramento-San Joaquin
estuary in areas where salt
and freshwater systems
meet. Occurs seasonally
in Suisun Bay, Carquinez
Strait and San Pablo Bay.

Seldom found at salinities
> 10 ppt; most often at
salinities < 2 ppt.

No Potential. The Project
Area does not contain
estuarine waters.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-36
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
steelhead - central CA coast DPS
Oncorhynchus mykiss irideus
FT Occurs from the Russian
River south to Soquel
Creek and Pajaro River.

Also in San Francisco and
San Pablo Bay Basins.

Adults migrate upstream to
spawn in cool, clear, welloxygenated streams.

Juveniles remain in fresh
water for 1 or more years
before migrating
downstream to the ocean.

No Potential. The Project
Area does not contain
suitable anadromous or
estuarine waters.

No further action
recommended for this
species.
longfin smelt
Spirinchus thaleichthys
FC, ST, SSC Euryhaline, nektonic and
anadromous. Found in
open waters of estuaries,
mostly in middle or bottom
of water column. Prefer
salinities of 15 to 30 ppt,
but can be found in
completely freshwater to
almost pure seawater.

No Potential. The Project
Area does not contain
riverine or estuarine
waters.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-37
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
Invertebrates
vernal pool tadpole shrimp
Lepidurus packardi
FE Inhabits vernal pools and
swales in the Sacramento
Valley containing clear to
highly turbid water. Pools
commonly found in grass
bottomed swales of
unplowed grasslands.

Some pools are mudbottomed and highly
turbid.

No Potential. The Project
Area does not contain
vernal pool habitat to
support this species.

No further action
recommended for this
species.
conservancy fairy shrimp
Branchinecta conservatio
FE Endemic to the grasslands
of the northern two-thirds
of the Central Valley;
found in large, turbid
pools. Inhabit astatic
pools located in swales
formed by old, braided
alluvium; filled by
winter/spring rains, last
until June.

No Potential. The Project
Area does not contain
vernal pool habitat to
support this species.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

Bay checkerspot butterfly
Euphydryas editha bayensis
FT, RP Restricted to native
grasslands on outcrops of
serpentine soil in the
vicinity of San Francisco
Bay. Plantago erecta is the
primary host plant;
Orthocarpus densiflorus
and O. purpurscens are
the secondary host plants.

No Potential. Suitable
habitat is not present for
this species in the Project
Area. The nearest
documented occurrence is
over 5 miles from the
Project Area (CDFW
2019).

No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-38
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
monarch butterfly
Danaus plexippus
Winter roosts
protected
Winter roost sites extend
along the coast from
northern Mendocino to
Baja California, Mexico.

Roosts located in windprotected tree groves
(eucalyptus, Monterey
pine, Monterey cypress),
with nectar and water
sources nearby.

No Potential. Suitable
roosting habitat,
characterized by large
stands of trees that
provide thermoregulation
and protection, is not
present on the Project
Area.

No further action
recommended for this
species.
western bumble bee
Bombus occidentalis
SC Formerly common
throughout much of
western North America;
populations from southern
British Columbia to central
California have declined.

Occurs in a wide variety of
habitat types. Nests are
constructed annually in
pre-existing cavities,
usually on the ground (e.g.
mammal burrows). Many
plant species are visited
and pollinated.

Unlikely. Though the
Project Area contains
relatively few burrows that
could be used by ground
nesting bees, no western
bumblebees were
observed during site visits.

Additionally, this species is
generally considered to be
extirpated from the San
Francisco Bay Area.

No further action
recommended for this
species.

C-39
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
crotch bumble bee
Bombus crotchii
SC Nearly endemic to
California, the crotch
bumblebee historically
occupied grasslands and
shrublands in southern
and central California with
occasional records in the
northern part of the state.

Requires floral resources
and undisturbed nest sites.

No Potential. Generally
speaking, this species is
presumed to be extirpated
from the San Francisco
Bay Area. However, areas
of floral resources and
annual grass are present
on the Project Area that
might support this species
if it was regionally present.

No further action
recommended for this
species.
*Key to status codes:

FC Federal Candidate for Listing
FE Federal Endangered
BGEPA Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act Species
FT Federal Threatened
SC (E/T) State Candidate for Listing (Endangered/Threatened) SE State Endangered
CFP California Fully Protected Species
SR State Rare
SSC State Species of Special Concern
ST State Threatened
Rank 1A California Rare Plant Rank (CRPR) 1A: Plants presumed extinct in California Rank 1B CRPR 1B: Plants rare, threatened or endangered in California and elsewhere Rank 2A CRPR 2A: Plants presumed extirpated in California, but more common elsewhere Rank 2B CRPR 2B: Plants rare, threatened, or endangered in California, but more common elsewhere Rank 3 CRPR 3: Plants about which CNPS needs more information (a review list) Rank 4 CRPR 4: Plants of limited distribution (a watch list) WBWG Western Bat Working Group High or Medium-high Priority Species Potential to Occur:

No Potential. Habitat on and adjacent to the site is clearly unsuitable for the species requirements (cover, substrate, elevation, hydrology, plant community, site history, disturbance regime).

Unlikely. Few of the habitat components meeting the species requirements are present, and/or the majority of habitat on and adjacent to the site is C-40
SPECIES STATUS* HABITAT

REQUIREMENTS

POTENTIAL TO OCCUR

IN THE PROJECT AREA

RECOMMENDATIONS
unsuitable or of very poor quality. The species is not likely to be found on the site.

Moderate Potential. Some of the habitat components meeting the species requirements are present, and/or only some of the habitat on or adjacent to the site is unsuitable. The species has a moderate probability of being found on the site.

High Potential. All of the habitat components meeting the species requirements are present and/or most of the habitat on or adjacent to the site is highly suitable. The species has a high probability of being found on the site.

Results and Recommendations:

Present. Species was observed on the site or has been recorded (i.e. CNDDB, other reports) on the site recently.

Assumed Present. Species is assumed to be present on-site based on the presence of key habitat components.

Assumed Present without Impact. Species assumed present; however, project activities will not have an impact on the species.

Presumed Absent. Species is presumed to not be present due to a lack of key habitat components.

Not Observed. Species was not observed during dedicated/formal surveys.

Not Present. Species is considered not present due to a clear lack of any suitable habitat and/or local range limitations.

APPENDIX D

REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT AREA PHOTOGRAPHS
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Photograph 1. Photograph of recently graded, developed portion of the Project Area. Photo taken December 17, 2019.

Photograph 2. Photograph of ruderal herbaceous vegetation, dominated by non-native annual grasses and smilo grass (Stipa miliacea var. miliacea) along the northern boundary of the Project Area. Photograph taken December 17, 2019.

Appendix D. Representative Photographs 1
Photograph 3. Photograph of a potential wetland feature (foreground). Non-native annual grassland visible in background. Photograph taken April 13, 2018.

Photograph 4. Photograph of non-wetland waters, surrounded by ruderal herbaceous vegetation, in the southern portion of the Project Area. Photograph taken December 17, 2019.

Appendix D. Representative Photographs 2

APPENDIX E

BIRD-SAFE DESIGN LETTER
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
January 13, 2021
Michael Lisenbee
David J. Powers & Associates, Inc.
1871 The Alameda, Suite 200
San Jose, CA 951262
Re: “Bird-safe” design review for The Estuary @ Terra Hotel commercial development, Alviso, California – 2021 Update
Dear Mr. Lisenbee:

This letter provides a review of the proposed Estuary @ Terra Hotel development (Project) in Alviso, Santa Clara County, California, within the context of “bird-safe” requirements outlined in Mitigation Measure (MM) BIO-6.1 in the Topgolf @ Terra Project Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND, File no. PDC16-013, GPT16-001), and the San Jose Downtown Design Guidelines Section 4.4.2b (“Bird Safety”). The proposed development is located along the north side of the Guadalupe River and immediately east of North 1st Street in the City of Alviso (Project Area).

The plans for this project were originally reviewed by WRA, Inc. (WRA) in the context of bird safety in a letter dated December 20, 2019. However, subsequent material and design changes have necessitated that the building plans be reassessed to ensure that changes remain in compliance with best practices and local ordinances. This review includes a general discussion of bird safety concerns in the context of the aforementioned measures and guidelines, which in turn indicates the level of significant of risk for bird strikes of the project under CEQA.

Subsequent sections specifically address updated design elements that may influence the frequency of bird collisions with the proposed development, and provide pertinent recommendations to reduce any potential impacts to a less than significant level.

Background
A search of relevant bird safety background literature was conducted as a part of this review, including the following:
• “Bird-Friendly Building with Glass and Light” (Schmid et al. 2013) • “Bird-Friendly Building Design” (Sheppard 2011)
• “Standards for Bird-Safe Buildings” (San Francisco Planning Department 2011) Generally speaking, buildings that feature extensive amounts of clear or especially reflective glass on the exterior and/or heavily vegetated areas directly adjacent to buildings can result in a relatively high incidence of bird collisions. Though not thoroughly understood, it is presumed that birds in flight see through glass faces and discern apparently desirable areas on the other side, and/or interpret reflections of the surrounding environment (e.g., the sky, vegetation) to be actual habitat or otherwise attractive space. Vegetated pathways leading towards building facades can also encourage birds to fly towards buildings, resulting in collisions primarily on the lower stories.
2 MM BIO-6.1 stipulates a number of restrictions related to building design, the goal of which is to reduce the likelihood of bird strikes with buildings and structures associated with the Project.

Three specific design elements that may cause excessive risk for bird collisions are outlined:
• Façade Treatments: The measure stipulates that no more than 10 percent of the surface area of facades between the ground and 60 feet above the ground shall have untreated glazing. Bird-friendly treatments that may be applied to mitigate risk from glazed surfaces include the use of opaque glass, covering of clear glass with patterns, the use of paned glass with fenestration patterns, and the use of external screens over nonreflective glass. • Funneling of Flight Paths: Buildings shall be designed to avoid the funneling of flight paths along buildings or trees towards a building façade. • Skyways, walkways, or glass walls: Glass skyways or walkways and freestanding glass walls shall not be incorporated into the buildings’ design Additionally, the City of San Jose Downtown Design Guidelines (hereafter “Guidelines”) and City Council Policy 6-34 (Riparian Corridor Protection and Bird-Safe Design) provide guidance on bird-safe design in areas where birds are most common. The area north of Highway 237, which includes the Project Area, is specifically mentioned in these guidelines as a location where birdsafe design is an important consideration. The Guidelines identify the following measures as being conducive to reducing bird collision risk:
• Buildings within 300 feet of a riparian corridor should have all glazing treated that is visible from the riparian corridor with a bird safety treatment. o Bird safety treatments may include: exterior screens, louvers, grilles, shutters, sunshades, bird-safe patterns, or other methods to reduce the likelihood of bird collisions
o Exterior decorative lighting on these buildings should additionally be turned off between 2:00 AM and 6:00 AM, except during June, July, December, and January where birds may be migrating and constraints may be increased. This may involve turning non-emergency lighting off or shielding it at night (after sunset) to minimize light from buildings that is visible to birds. • Avoid creating areas of glazing through which trees, landscaped areas, water features, or the sky is visible unless a bird safety treatment is used. • Reduce or eliminate upward-facing spotlights on buildings. • Do not plant landscaping tree lines that are perpendicular to glass façades. • Do not use mirrored glass.
• Use a bird safety treatment [as detailed in MM BIO-6.1] on the façade of any floor of the building within 15 vertical feet of the level of and visible from a green roof, including a green roof on an adjacent building within 20 horizontal feet, if the facade has 50% or more glazed surface
Assessment
For the updated building design specifications, WRA reviewed the “Planned Development Permit for Hotel Alviso @ Terra” architectural document by CORBel architects and associated firms (dated Oct. 29, 2020). The Project is one component of a larger overall development, and consists of one five-story 110,700 gross square foot building; the footprint of the building is anticipated to be approximately 47,000 square feet. Adjoining the hotel will be a three level parking garage that will accommodate 235 total car parking stalls, in addition to 12 motorcycle 3 spaces and bicycle parking areas. In addition, the Project involves approximately 192,000 square feet of landscaping/hardscaping that will involve paving for access to the hotel and other facilities and the installation of shrubs/street trees surrounding the hotel itself.

The updated buildings’ design is similar in many ways to the original 2019 drawing, and incorporates many of the same elements that reduce the potential for bird collisions. Many of the following statements are based on the assumptions that all glass used in construction will be clear (i.e. non-reflective) and that any exterior decorative lighting will not be directed upward and will conform to on/off timing guidance detailed in the City Guidelines:
• The amount of glazing proposed is relatively low overall in comparison to some similarlyscaled developments in the region. The percent of glazing on the exterior elevations is less than 50 percent overall and approximately the same on all faces. The remainder of the buildings’ exteriors consist of opaque materials (e.g. cement and metal siding).

Additionally, in almost all cases windows are isolated from each other at regular intervals, versus being grouped/conjoined to form larger contiguous window panels (see exceptions below). The only semi-contiguous glazing occurs at ground level, where there is a relatively low risk of bird collision; additionally, this panel is broken up at regular intervals by fenestration and pillars.
• All residential units within the development will have interior blinds or curtains installed on windows. While the frequency of use of these blinds will presumably vary based on the preferences of individual occupants, it seems likely that blinds will be regularly used in at least some (if not most) of the units throughout the various portions of the development, reducing the overall likelihood of birds attempting to fly through the glazing.
• Overhangs, spatially offset adjacent faces, and similar forms of architectural relief along the exterior of the building will “break up” the exterior of the building visually (providing “visual noise”), and increase the likelihood that flying birds will perceive the building as a solid surface. Shadows formed by these overhangs and relief will contribute to this perception. Areas of exterior relief are prominent on all of the building elevations. • Similar to the architectural relief elements described above, the buildings will feature different colors and textures across adjacent faces and sections, creating additional “visual noise”. The siding patterns are additionally varied between having vertical and horizontal lines, which will create further “visual noise” on larger contiguous areas. • While the original design included hotel room balconies with associated guardrails, the new design eliminates balconies on higher levels of the hotel. There is thus no longer any risk associated with collisions with these features. • The parking garage designs suggest that no glazing will be used in the construction of this structure, greatly reducing collision risk. Green walls installed along the ground level of the parking structure may attract some birds (e.g., for foraging opportunities), but do not constitute any notable collision risk given that surrounding surfaces contain minimal glazing and are opaque (i.e. concrete or metal). The remainder of the parking garage is planned to be constructed of opaque materials.
• Though the Project Area is in relatively close proximity to wetlands associated with the Don Edwards National Wildlife Refuge Complex, it is surrounded on all other sides by 4 urban (residential or light industrial) development. As such, it is unlikely to provide a collision risk to flocks of waterbirds (e.g., waterfowl, shorebirds) that congregate on San Francisco Bay and shoreline habitats during the winter period and spring-fall migration. • Landscaping on the Project Area is generally in accordance with bird safe guidelines.

Most of the street trees around the perimeter of the building will not extend upward past the ground floor to provide collision opportunities with more heavily glazed upper floors, and these trees are oriented parallel (rather than perpendicular) to any larger glazed areas on the building.

Recommendations
In WRA’s assessment of the 2019 plans, transparent building corners (i.e., design features where the corner of a building is transparent) were identified as a potential collision risk. This feature can cause birds to become confused when they see potential perches or habitat through the corner and attempt to traverse the area. WRA’s review of the current building design suggests that the newest iteration of the planned construction no longer includes transparent building corners; thus, collision risk associated with this design feature no longer exists for this project.

Though the designs for the Project suggest a low overall risk for bird collisions, some elements do still pose a relatively increased risk. If building elements are considered to conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources (i.e. bird-safe design guidelines), interfere substantially with the movement of native resident or migratory wildlife species, or potentially have a substantial adverse impact on any special-status species, these impacts could be considered significant under CEQA or in violation of the project MMRP. Problematic design elements are outlined below and respectively followed by measures that would reduce any impacts to a less than significant level:

Non-treated glazing on building elevations proximal to wetland areas Though not a design element per se, the Project is located directly adjacent to, and within 300 feet of, the Guadalupe River to the northeast. This area contains large patches of wetland vegetation that could provide habitat for birds that typically use riparian or wetland areas. The presence of untreated glazing will likely result in an increased risk of collision.

Recommendation: Treatment of windows
Any glazing on the building, particularly any panes that will not possess blinds or other screens to create additional opacity, shall be treated in a recommended manner to reduce the likelihood of bird collision. These methods may include: exterior screens, louvers, grilles, shutters, sunshades, bird-safe patterns, use of non-reflective glazing, and the use of paned glass with fenestration patterns as detailed in MM BIO 6.1.

Landscaping adjacent to buildings could be attractive to birds and increase collision risk As per the project plans, landscaping, including the use of larger trees, is planned for areas adjacent to the hotel building. While landscaping does not inherently provide a bird collision risk, the presence of large trees near glazed areas can provide an increased risk of collision simply as a result of proximity. This can be particularly pronounced if the trees used in landscaping provide high quality nesting habitats or foraging opportunities for avian species. 5 Recommendation: Tree placement and selection
Any trees used in landscaping that are adjacent to areas of untreated glazing should be species where the growth of which will be limited to at or below the first story.

Additionally, tree species should be selected for locations next to untreated glazing on buildings that do not provide valuable resources for birds (e.g., food such as berries or other fruits, or cavities for nesting in their adult state).

Summary
The Project features several design elements that reduce the overall risk of bird collisions, though some elements involving untreated glazing and landscaping may present a relatively higher risk. WRA recommends treatment on all glazed areas that are not fitted with blinds or screens, as outlined in the city Guidelines and referenced in MM BIO-6.1, as well as selection of tree species in landscaping that occurs next to buildings that do not provide particularly attractive foraging or nesting opportunities. Minimizing the extent of artificial night lighting utilized, save that for safety purposes, is also recommended. Given the existing design features, the incorporation of the recommendations and measures provided herein should be regarded as having minimized collision risk as stated in associated regulatory materials.

Consequently, the potential impact to nearby avifauna under CEQA as it relates to bird-safe building design is considered to be less than significant.

Please contact me with questions.

Sincerely,
Brian Kearns, Ph.D.

Wildlife Biologist
6 References
San Francisco Planning Department. 2011. Standards for Bird-Safe Buildings. July. 41 pp.

Schmid, H., W. Doppler, D. Heynen & M. Rössler (2013): Bird-Friendly Building with Glass and Light. 2., revised Edition. Swiss Ornithological Institute, Sempach.

Sheppard, C. 2011. Bird-Friendly Building Design. American Bird Conservancy, The Plains, VA, 60 pp.
6 References
San Francisco Planning Department. 2011. Standards for Bird-Safe Buildings. July. 41 pp.

Schmid, H., W. Doppler, D. Heynen & M. Rössler (2013): Bird-Friendly Building with Glass and Light. 2., revised Edition. Swiss Ornithological Institute, Sempach.

Sheppard, C. 2011. Bird-Friendly Building Design. American Bird Conservancy, The Plains, VA, 60 pp.

ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT OF APPROXIMATELY 36 ACRES AT 4701 N. 1ST STREET IN THE ALVISO AREA
OF SAN JOSÉ IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Prepared by:

Sunshine Psota, M.A., RPA
Holman & Associates
3615 Folsom Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
[email protected]
Prepared for:

Michael Lisenbee
David J. Powers & Associates
1871 The Alameda, Suite 200
San Jose, CA 95126
November 2015
CONFIDENTIAL:

This report contains confidential cultural resources location information; report distribution should be restricted to those with a need to know. Cultural resources are nonrenewable, and their scientific, cultural, and aesthetic values can be significantly impaired by their disturbance. To deter vandalism, artifact hunting, and other activities that can damage cultural resources, the location of cultural resources should be kept confidential. The legal authority to restrict cultural resources information is in California Government Code 6254.1 and the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Section 304.

Cover photo: Overview of eastern tract with current golfing facility, looking north.

Archaeological Survey Report of Approximately 36 Acres at 4701 N. 1st Street Holman & Associates, San Francisco in the Alviso area of San José in Santa Clara County November 2015 i

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
The approximately 36-acre Project Area is located at 4701 N. 1st Street in the Alviso area of San José in Santa Clara County. This report documents archival literature review and an archaeological survey. This report will assist the developers with the City of San José planning process.

A records search and literature review identified no previously recorded archaeological sites within the project footprint. Previous archaeological studies included portions of the Project Area and identified the potential for buried archaeological resources within its boundaries.

Native American consultation began by contacting the Native American Heritage Commission. A second letter was sent when no response was received after six weeks. Their response did not identify any concerns, but included a list of 11 individuals/groups who were also contacted. Of the three who have responded to date, none have expressed any concerns. At no time during the consultation process was any specific Native American resource identified within or adjacent to the Project Area.

On 8 October 2015, Holman & Associates conducted an intensive survey of the Project Area. No prehistoric or historic-era cultural materials were noted, Holman & Associates recommends a qualified archaeologist trained in both California prehistoric and historic current methods complete a presence/absence exploration with a backhoe once specific plans are designed and prior to any earth moving activities.

In the unlikely event cultural resources are discovered during the proposed construction work, the following information should be considered to address the situation. If undetected, buried, or previously unrecognized archaeological deposits or materials of any kind are inadvertently exposed during any construction activity, work within 100 ft. of the find shall cease until a qualitied archaeologist can assess the find and provide recommendations for further treatment, if warranted. Construction and potential impacts to the area(s) within a radius determined by the archaeologist shall not recommence until the assessment is complete.

Archaeological Survey Report of Approximately 36 Acres at 4701 N. 1st Street Holman & Associates, San Francisco in the Alviso area of San José in Santa Clara County November 2015 ii

CONTENTS
Summary of Findings ..................................................................................................................................... i Contents ........................................................................................................................................................ ii Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 3 Sources Consulted ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Records Search Methods and Results ..................................................................................................... 3 Agency and Public Consulted ................................................................................................................ 4 Background ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Environmental ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Ethnography ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Historic Overview .................................................................................................................................. 6 Archaeological Sensitivity ...................................................................................................................... 7 Field Methods ............................................................................................................................................... 7 Study Summary and Findings ....................................................................................................................... 7 Survey Findings ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Western Tract ................................................................................................................................... 8 Driving Range and Eastern Tract ..................................................................................................... 8 Recommendations .................................................................................................................................. 8 References ..................................................................................................................................................... 9

MAPS AND PHOTOS
Map 1. Location of TopGolf Driving Range Project, N. 1st Street, Alviso, Santa Clara County .............. 12 Map 2. Aerial View of Project Area with Proposed Improvements.. ......................................................... 13 Photo 1. Overview of open area of fill in Western Tract ............................................................................ 14 Photo 2. Paved area for vehicular storage in Western Tract. ...................................................................... 14 Photo 3. Overview of golfing area situated on raised fill. .......................................................................... 14 Photo 4. View of North 1st Street with raised fill area to south (left) ........................................................ 14 Photo 5. Overview of unmaintained Eastern Tract. .................................................................................... 14

APPENDIX
Native American Consultation

Archaeological Survey Report of Approximately 36 Acres at 4701 N. 1st Street Holman & Associates, San Francisco in the Alviso area of San José in Santa Clara County November 2015 3 INTRODUCTION
The approximately 36-acre TopGolf Project Area is located at 4701 North 1st Street in the Alviso area of San José in Santa Clara County (Maps 1 and 2). Currently 26 acres are developed with the Pin High Golf Center, which consists of a ground-level driving range, three golf holes, and additional golf instructional areas, along with associated infrastructure such as parking, lights, and netting. The adjacent 10 acres to the west is partially undeveloped, and an area closest to Pin High Golf Course is used for recreational vehicle storage. Plans for this western area consist of constructing a hotel to provide as many as 225 hotel rooms and 100,000 square feet (sf) of commercial uses. This report documents an archival literature search, and archaeological survey conducted by Holman & Associates on 8 October 2015. The investigation and will assist the developers with the City of San José planning process.

This report was prepared by Sunshine Psota, M.A. (Cultural Resources Management [CRM]), Registered Professional Archaeologist (RPA). The author has more than 35 years of experience in California archaeology, much of it in the San Francisco Bay Area. She meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for professionals in prehistoric and historical archaeology. The survey was conducted by Kevin Dobinson (B.A.), who has more than 15 years of experience in California archaeology.

SOURCES CONSULTED

RECORDS SEARCH METHODS AND RESULTS
On 1 October 2015, the author performed a records search at the Northwest Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS), Sonoma State University (File Number 14-516). The review included all cultural resources mapped on the CHRIS base maps within a quarter mile of the Project Area, and within an eighth of a mile for studies. Also reviewed were historic-era maps and literature on file including state and federal inventories. Reports and maps from Holman & Associates’ library were also used and limited archival research was conducted.

The CHRIS has plotted no cultural resources within the Project Area. Three cultural resources detailing the built environment are recorded within a quarter mile:
- P-43-346, also designated CA-SCL-339H, documents the standing concrete wall and foundation of the former Bayside Cannery Warehouse (Dexter and Rivera 2011); - P-43-1110, also designated CA-SCL-810H, describes an historic ship building facility at the Port of Alviso which operated during World War II (Dexter and Hatoff 1998); and - P-43-1468, consists of the 18th and 19th century Port of Alviso District including residences, public buildings, warehouses, and docks, and is listed on the National and California registers (Kerr 1978).

Four previous investigations have included portions of the TopGolf Project Area though none identified any cultural resources within or adjacent to the Project Area. Holman (2000) conducted an archival and field study of most if not all of the current Project Area. He described his study area as undeveloped in the north, a golf course in the center, a remnant slough of Guadalupe River in the east, and trailer and equipment storage in the Moffat, Liberty, North 1st streets western area. He noted Cartier’s recent investigations of a survey and trenching of a nearby property to the east. Cartier had identified a well-shaped bowl mortar and some fragments of potentially heat-affected rock in the spoils of an

Archaeological Survey Report of Approximately 36 Acres at 4701 N. 1st Street Holman & Associates, San Francisco in the Alviso area of San José in Santa Clara County November 2015 4 excavated drainage ditch. Cartier recorded the resource as CA-SCL-485 (over a quarter of a mile east of the TopGolf Project Area) and then conducted subsurface trenching along the northern side of North 1st Street without identifying buried cultural materials or deposits. Holman’s survey of the property documented extremely limited soil visibility, recent fill, and the high potential for nearby buried archaeological sites. He recommended additional research be conducted because so much of his study area was unavailable for mechanical subsurface exploration, specifically the golf course area.

In 1980, Detlefs et al. conducted research and a field survey for the Guadalupe River Flood Control Project. That study included the southern edge of the current Project Area along the banks of the current channel of the Guadalupe River. Their research identified a historically sensitive area within the southeast portion of the TopGolf Project Area that was associated with the Charles W. Young/Peter Burnett house from the mid to late 1800s.

Basin Research Associates (1995) completed a Master Plan for Alviso that included the entire Project Area. Their study included both archival research of previously identified cultural resources and a windshield survey of potential additional buildings constructed in the 1800s. No archaeological survey work was completed for any of their study area.

In 2010, Busby completed a Historic Property Survey Report for the San José Bay Trail Master Plan Project. That project consisted of 13.3 miles of trails in the Alviso area including the south central portion of the current Project Area by the Guadalupe River.

Four other investigations have been conducted within an eighth of a mile to the Project Area (Busby 1997; Garaventa and Harmon 1982; Holman 1989, 1992). Garaventa and Harmon’s project area abutted the northeastern end of the current Project Area by North 1st Street. These researchers recommended archaeological monitoring of ground disturbing activities (Garaventa and Harmon 1982:12). Holman’s 1992 study area was just north of the current Project Area, north of 1st Street between Grand Ave. in the west and Mayne School in the east, and it was covered with fill. Busby’s 1997 study area was a smaller footprint but in the same location as Holman’s 1989 study. Busby (1997:6) recommended archaeological monitoring of earth disturbing activities.

In this general area, Native American sites tend to be situated adjacent to the edge of the historic margins of San Francisco Bay, and adjacent to creeks and rivers. Given changes to riparian systems and bay margins over several millennia, and a nearby former wetland environment or pond to the northeast, the likelihood of subsurface Native American deposits within the Project Area is moderate to high.

A review of the California Inventory of Historic Resources (CA-DPR 1976) and the most recent California’s Office of Historic Preservation’s Historic Property Data File (2012) did not identify any cultural resources within the Project Area. Nor do the City of San José’s Heritage Resources Inventory (2014a) City Districts (2015), and Designated City Landmarks (2014b) list any resources within or adjacent to the Project Area.

AGENCY AND PUBLIC CONSULTED
Holman & Associates contacted the Native American Heritage Commission on 24 September 2015 to request a review of the Sacred Land Files for any evidence of cultural resources or traditional properties of potential concern to Native Americans within or adjacent to the Project Area (see Appendix for correspondence). When the Commission did not responded by 2 November, the author contacted the Commission later that day, and also the following day. Another inquiry letter with map was emailed on 3

Archaeological Survey Report of Approximately 36 Acres at 4701 N. 1st Street Holman & Associates, San Francisco in the Alviso area of San José in Santa Clara County November 2015 5 November 2015. The Commission responded on 10 November with a list of eleven Native American contacts who may be able to provide information on possible areas of cultural sensitivity. That day, the author contacted each of these by email or one by regular mail requesting any information about cultural resources in the vicinity or any concerns they would like to express about this particular project.

That day Ed Ketchum, Historian for the Amah Mutsun Tribal Band responded that the project is near the area associated with Ulistac on lands controlled by the Tamien speakers. He believes these lands are best represented by the Muwekma Tribal Band (who were also contacted). The next day, Valentin Lopez, Chairman of the Amah Mutsun Tribal Band, replied that the project is outside the traditional territory of the Amah Mutsun, and the tribe had no comment. Andrew Galvan responded that he had no comments based on the recommendations provided at the end of this report. No other comments were received. At no time during the consultation process was any specific Native American resource identified within or adjacent to the study area.

BACKGROUND

ENVIRONMENTAL
The project footprint is situated east of where the Guadalupe River empties into the southernmost portion of San Francisco Bay. The Project Area lies within the Alviso area of northern San José. The land slopes from 5 to 16 ft. above mean sea level with the lowest elevation in the southeast. The project footprint is situated on part of a large alluvial valley floor just east of the southern portion of San Francisco Bay.

Soils are mapped as Urbanland Xerothents (123), an anthropogenic fill, in the westernmost portion of the Project Area (USGS 2015). The paved storage area and the parking facility for golfing are noted as Urban – Clear Lake Complex (150). The golfing center is mapped as Clear Lake Silty Clay (161), an alluvium basin soil typically consisting of 0-66 inches of silty clay. The southeastern-most area consists of Campbell silty loam (166) formed on alluvial fans, frequently comprised of 0-24 inches of silty loam underlain by 25-51 inches of silty clay loam with 51-79 inches of silty clay below.

Geological deposits are recorded along the western edge and closest to the current channel of the Guadalupe River as Alluvial fan – estuarine complex deposits (Qhfe; Witter et al. 2006). Alluvial fan deposits, fine facies (Qhff), are mapped for the remaining portions of the golf course area. According to an 1857 mapping of the wetlands of San Francisco Bay, the entire Project Area was part of the flat lands adjacent to historic bay margins. This environment could have served as a prime resource area for native people with small special task sites geared towards subsistence activities

ETHNOGRAPHY
The project area lies within the territory controlled ethnographically by Costanoan or Ohlonespeakers (Levy 1978). A member of the Utian language family, the Ohlone language was spoken throughout the San Francisco Peninsula, the East Bay, and the Monterey Bay area. Some Native American descendants of these people still prefer the term “Costanoan,” while others prefer Ohlone, whereas still others more readily identify with specific tribelet names.

The project area is situated within the Alviso SF Solano tribelet (Milliken 2006:Figure 5, 46). The Alviso SR Solano were centered around the historic-era community of Alviso and they also controlled

Archaeological Survey Report of Approximately 36 Acres at 4701 N. 1st Street Holman & Associates, San Francisco in the Alviso area of San José in Santa Clara County November 2015 6 other parts of the estuary that frames South San Francisco Bay in Santa Clara and Alameda counties (Milliken 1995:252, 256). Their western boundary likely extended to the Guadalupe River. No ethnographic villages have been identified within or adjacent to the Project Area (Kroeber 1925:465; Levy 1978:485; Milliken 1995).

HISTORIC OVERVIEW
Initial Spanish contact with the local Native Americans probably began prior to the establishment of the Mission Santa Clara in 1777 (Hoover et al. 1990). The missions’ goals of colonizing the local Native American community were accomplished by using them to provide the labor for building, construction and daily operations of the missions. After secularization of the missions, large areas of land were opened for landgrants with the Project Area part of Rincon de Los Esteros landgrant. The associated Alviso (Valencia) adobe was constructed around 1830 and it was situated on a large bend of the Guadalupe River a half mile east of Liberty Street and north of the Alviso – Milpitas Road (now State Route 237; Detlefs et al. 1980:9; Hendry and Bowman 1940:865) beyond the southeastern end of the Project Area. During the Hispanic Period, the project footprint was likely part of a large grazing area.

The Project Area is situated between the Hispanic waterfront of the Embarcadero de Santa Clara on the south side of the Guadalupe River about a half mile upstream from present day Alviso and the historical downtown portion of Alviso that took its place as a port (Busby 1997:3-4). The town was surveyed in 1849 and was incorporated three years later. The major thoroughfare was the San José – Alviso Road, now North 1st Street. At its peak, Alviso was one of the major commercial shipping ports in northern California. But when the San Francisco to San José railroad was constructed in the 1870s, it was not near Alviso and the town declined from economic neglect despite several enterprising efforts to revitalize the area including a cannery. The town was incorporated into the City of San José in the 1960s.

A review of historic-era maps was conducted to expand on the changing historical land use patterns of the preceding approximately 160 years. Before the community of Alviso was established, the bay marsh was situated close to the northwest corner of the Project Area at North 1st and Liberty streets (Nichols & Wright 1971 projecting USCGS 1857). By 1876, the northern and western portions of the Project Area were owned by C.W. Young with a house situated between North 1st Street and a gooseneck of the Guadalupe River (Thompson & West 1876). O. Whitbaugh owned 19 acres to the east including most of the Eastern Tract.

By 1899, the port of Alviso (see SCL-335) was developed between Alviso and Guadalupe sloughs (USCGS 1899). One building was situated near the northwest corner and five buildings were extant in the southern central portion of the Project Area. North 1st was the main road from the port south to San José, laid out east of the Guadalupe River. West of the Guadalupe River, the Southern Pacific’s Santa Cruz Division railroad tracks carried goods between Alviso and Santa Clara where that spur linked up with the Monterey Division. The Guadalupe River once meandered more with goosenecks before flood control project straightened its channel; prior to recent channelization more land was present between North 1st and the river than the current Project Area entails.

Sanborn Insurance Maps offer few details because the town ended at Liberty Street, however, a oneroom building was depicted facing that road in 1908 with a similarly shaped outbuilding to the rear (Sanborn Insurance Company 1908). This location is now part of the southwestern portion of the Project Area. By 1930, a one-story two-room Japanese School with two outbuildings was situated back from

Archaeological Survey Report of Approximately 36 Acres at 4701 N. 1st Street Holman & Associates, San Francisco in the Alviso area of San José in Santa Clara County November 2015 7 Liberty Street midway between that street and the current Project Area (Sanborn Insurance Company 1930).

By 1942, the Project Area contained eight buildings, none fronting North 1st Street. All were situated along a dirt road approximately equidistant between North 1st and the then unchannelized course of the river (US Army 1942, 1947). The southeastern portion of the Project Area was situated adjacent to a marsh that had once been part of the river. Gold Street was constructed just east of the railroad tracks.

Salt ponds were constructed west of Alviso within wetlands. Between 1951 and 1953, the dirt road (now Moffat Street) had been improved in the western quadrant of the Project Area (USGS 1951, 1953). Four buildings were situated within the Project Area: a new one in the northwest, a new one in the southwest and two previously depicted buildings remaining in the south central portion. To the east and south, lands were planted in orchards, and to the north and west more lands were converted to salt ponds. By 1961, three buildings faced Liberty Street and no other buildings were extant within the Project Area (USGS 1961). Small ponds, presumably remnants of past flooding, had formed between the leveed main river channel and the Project Area.

ARCHAEOLOGICAL SENSITIVITY
Portions of the golf course and associated parking area are moderate to highly sensitive to contain buried Native American sites. The potential for historic-era archaeological deposits associated with several different buildings is also high, and those locations are dispersed throughout the Project Area and have been briefly described above.

FIELD METHODS
On 8 October 2015, Holman & Associates conducted a surface reconnaissance focusing on all accessible lands within the Project Area. Locations with exposed soil were inspected for evidence of subsurface material or paleosols that might have been redeposited on the surface during previous impacts to the parcels. Where exposed soils were encountered, a trowel was used to remove engineering gravels and vegetation to increase the area of visibility and enabled inspection.

STUDY SUMMARY AND FINDINGS
Plans to improve an existing golf course and driving range and adjacent parcels used for vehicular storage will include a driving range, limited golf course, and hotel. A records search did not identify any recorded cultural resources within the Project Area even though several previous studies included portions of the project footprint. Because of past periods of alluviation and more recent construction activities including fill deposits, there is a moderate to high possibility of buried archaeological deposits.

Initial Native American consultation did not identify any concerns about specific resources within the Project Area.

SURVEY FINDINGS
The Project Area is described in three sections: the Western Tract, the Golfing Center, and the Eastern Tract (Map 2). Photos 1-5 provide clarification to the discussion below.

Archaeological Survey Report of Approximately 36 Acres at 4701 N. 1st Street Holman & Associates, San Francisco in the Alviso area of San José in Santa Clara County November 2015 8 Western Tract
Most of this area was not accessible for archaeological surveying because it is paved and fenced (Photo 2). In the southeast corner, some soil was visible and consists of gray to tan/gray silt. The compacted soil contains some modern debris and is recent fill.

The westernmost area adjacent to Liberty Street is approximately one to two feet above street level.

Soil is tan to brown silt mixed with modern debris including concrete, plastic, and metal scraps (Photo 1).

The area adjacent to North 1st Street is approximately four feet higher than the road (Photo 4).

Driving Range and Eastern Tract
The active, current driving range is surrounded by a small golf course (Cover Photo) and only the perimeter of the course could be surveyed. The perimeter had exposed soil, tan/gray to gray fine silt with fine-grained sand that was most likely imported when landscaping the range and course. The golf center’s parking lot is covered with imported gravel. The landscaped area in the parking lot had some visible soil, tan silt with some small gravel. A mound area in the southwest portion is composed of tan soil with gravels.

The Eastern Tract was covered in heavy vegetation with very limited tan silty soil visible (Photo 5).

The area is the lowest of the project footprint and is approximately 10 to 12 feet below the top of the levee. In contrast, the driving range is about five to six feet below the levee. The lands adjacent North 1st Street are covered with gravels and include a storm drain (Photo 4).

RECOMMENDATIONS
The archaeological survey did not identify any cultural resources within the Project Area. Based on the information presented above and the moderate to high potential for archaeological deposits, Holman & Associates recommends that a qualified archaeologist trained in both California prehistoric and historic current methods complete a presence/absence exploration with a backhoe once specific plans are designed and prior to any earth moving activities. If any potentially California Register eligible resources are identified, they should be briefly documented, photographed, mapped, and tarped before the area is backfilled. If any archaeological resources are identified, Holman & Associates recommends a research design and treatment plan be completed by a qualified archaeologist before the archaeologists return to that location to hand excavate the feature(s) or deposits.

Archaeological Survey Report of Approximately 36 Acres at 4701 N. 1st Street Holman & Associates, San Francisco in the Alviso area of San José in Santa Clara County November 2015 9 REFERENCES
Basin Research Associates
1995 Cultural Resources Assessment for Alviso Master Plan Area, City of San José, Santa Clara County, California. Basin Research Associates, San Leandro. Prepared for David J. Powers & Associates, San José.

Busby, Colin I.
1997 Cultural Resources Assessment – Alviso Block Bounded by North 1st Street, Michigan Avenue, Archer Street, and Grand Boulevard, City of San José, Santa Clara County. Basin Research Associates, San Leandro. Prepared for David J. Powers & Associates, San José. 2010 Historic Property Survey Report for the City of San José’s San José Bay Trail Master Plan.

Basin Research Associates, San Leandro.

California Department of Parks and Recreation (CA-DPR)
1976 California Inventory of Historic Resources. Department of Parks and Recreation, Sacramento.

California Office of Historic Preservation (CA-OHP)
2012 Directory of Properties in the Historic Property Data File for Santa Clara County, update to 4 April 2012 (most recent). Office of Historic Preservation, Sacramento.

City of San José
2014a Heritage Resources Inventory. Available at https://www.sanJoséca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/ 35475.
2014b Designated City Landmarks. Available at http://www.sanJoséca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/ 35476.
2015 City Districts. Available at http://www.sanJoséca.gov/index.aspx?NID=2967.

Detlefs, Charlene, Robert Cartier, Glory Laffey, Joe Morris, Gerrit Fenenga, and Peter Johnson 1980 Cultural Resource Evaluation of the Presence or Absence if Historic and Prehistoric Sites for the Guadalupe River Flood Control Project. Archaeological Resource Management, San José.

Prepared for The Santa Clara Valley Water District.

Dexter, Sean, and Brian Hatoff
1998 Site Record for CA-SCL-810H (Primary No. P-43-1110). On file at the Northwest Information Center, California Historical Resources Information System, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, California.

Dexter, Sean, and Rivera, R.
2001 Site Record for CA-SCL-339H (Primary No. P-43-346). On file at the Northwest Information Center, California Historical Resources Information System, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, California.

Garaventa, Donna M., and Robert M. Harmon
1982 A Cultural Resources Assessment of a Land Parcel, Alviso, Santa Clara County. Basin Research Associates, San Leandro. Prepared for Knap, Clark, and Knapp, San José.

Hendry, G., and J. Bowman
1940 The Spanish and Mexican Adobes and Other Buildings in the Nine San Francisco Area Counties, 1776 to about 1810. Ms. on file, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.

Archaeological Survey Report of Approximately 36 Acres at 4701 N. 1st Street Holman & Associates, San Francisco in the Alviso area of San José in Santa Clara County November 2015 10 Holman, Miley P.
1989 Archaeological Research and Field Inspection of Leslie Salt Company Property, Alviso, Santa Clara County. Holman & Associates, San Francisco. Prepared for LSA, Pt. Richmond. 1992 Archaeological Field inspection of Alviso GPA, Alviso, San José, Santa Clara County, California. Holman & Associates, San Francisco. Prepared for Mindigo & Associates, San José. 2000 Archaeological Field Inspection of the Proposed Boccaardo Property Parcels 1, 2, 3, and 4 (APN 015-3-012, 015-39-020, 015-39-026, 015-39-027), Alviso, Santa Clara County, California. Holman & Associates, San Francisco. Prepared for David Powers & Associates, San José.

Hoover, Mildred Brooke, Hero Eugene Rensch, Douglas E. Kyle, Ethel G Rensch 1990 Historic Spots in California. Fourth edition. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto.

Kerr, S.
1978 Primary Record for P-43-1468. On file at the Northwest Information Center, California Historical Resources Information System, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, California.

Kroeber, A.L.
1925 Handbook of Indians of California. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 78, Washington, D.C.

Levy, Richard
1978 Costanoan. In Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8: California, editor R.F. Heizer, pp. 485-495. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.

Milliken, Randall
1995 A Time of Little Choice: The Disintegration of Tribal Culture in the San Francisco Bay Area, 1769-1810. Ballena Press, Menlo Park, California.
2006 The Central California Ethnographic Community Distribution Model, Version 2.0, with Special Attention to the San Francisco Bay. With contributions by Jerome King and Patricia Mikkelsen.

Consulting in the Past and Far Western Anthropological Research Group, Davis, California.

Prepared for California Department of Transportation, District 4, Oakland.

Nichols, Donald R. and Wright, Nancy A.,
1971 Preliminary Map of Historic Margins of Marshland, San Francisco Bay, California. U.S.

Geological Survey Open-File Report, scale 1:125,000.

Sanborn Map and Publishing Co. (Sanborn Insurance Company) 1908-1950 Sanborn Insurance Maps for Alviso, California. Sanborn Map and Publishing Co., New York.

Thompson & West
1876 Historic Atlas Map of Santa Clara County. Thompson & West, San Francisco.

United State Army (US Army)
1942 Milpitas 15' Quadrangle.
1947 Milpitas 15' Quadrangle.

United State Coast and Geodetic Survey (USCGS)
1857 Milpitas Alto 15' Quadrangle.
1899 Milpitas 15' Quadrangle.

Archaeological Survey Report of Approximately 36 Acres at 4701 N. 1st Street Holman & Associates, San Francisco in the Alviso area of San José in Santa Clara County November 2015 11 United States Geological Survey (USGS)
1951 Milpitas 15' Quadrangle.
1953 Milpitas 15' Quadrangle.
1961 Milpitas 15' Quadrangle.
2015 Online web soils survey. National Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. Available athttp://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/ WebSoilSurvey.aspx. Accessed 3 November 2015.

Witter, Robert C., Keith L. Knudsen, Janet M. Sowers, Carl M. Wentworth, Richard D. Koehler, and Carolyn E. Randolph
2006 Maps of Quaternary Deposits and Liquefaction Susceptibility in the Central San Francisco Bay Region, California. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1037, Online Version 1.1, Menlo Park, California, http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1037/, Updated May 5, 2006, Accessed 17 January 2012.

Map 1. Location of TopGolf Driving Range Project, N. 1st Street, Alviso, Santa Clara County , California

QUADRANGLE LOCATION
MN
17 Based on Milpitas, CA USGS Topographic 7.5' Series - 1961, Photorevised 1980 SCALE
1 MILE
1 KILOMETER
0 0

PROJECT AREA

PROJECT AREA
Map 2. Aerial View of Project Area with Proposed Improvements 1 2
3 Photo 1. Overview of open area of fill in Western Tract. Photo 2. Paved area for vehicular storage in Western Tract. Photo 3. Overview of golfing area situated on raised fill. Photo 4.

View of North 1st Street with raised fill area to south (left). Photo 5. Overview of unmaintained Eastern Tract. 5 4
1 Appendix E:

Phase I – Environmental Site Assessment
geologica
Report
Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment
Pin High Golf Center & 3 Adjacent Parcels
4701 North First Street
San Jose, California 95002
Submitted to:

Terra Hospitality, Inc.

November 10, 2015
Prepared by:

Geologica Inc.
220 4th Street, Suite 201
Oakland, California 94607
Phone: (415) 597-7888
Fax: (888) 858-1382
Innovative Strategies for Managing Environmental Liability GEOLOGICA INC.
220 4th Street, Suite 201 ~ Oakland, California 94607
415.597.7888 telephone ~ 888.858.1382 facsimile
[email protected]
November 10, 2015
Terra Hospitality, Inc.
c/o CBRE
225 W. Santa Clara Street, 10th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Attention: Mr. Jag Kapoor
Subject: DRAFT Report
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Pin High Golf Center & 3 Adjacent Parcels
4701 North First Street
San Jose, California
Dear Mr. Kapoor:

GEOLOGICA INC. is pleased to present this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) report for the above-referenced property.

We have enjoyed working with you on this project and appreciate the opportunity to be of service. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at (415) 597- 7888.

Very truly yours,
GEOLOGICA, INC.

Mark Hallee, P.G.

Senior Geologist
Brian F. Aubry, P.G., C.E.G., C.Hg.

Principal
We declare that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in 40 CFR 312.10. We have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. We have developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Report, Phase I ESA i
Pin High Golf Center, 4701 N. 1st Street, San Jose
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...............................................................................................................................1 1 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................................6

1.1 Guidance Protocol............................................................................................................. 6

1.2 Purpose .............................................................................................................................. 6

1.3 Scope of Services.............................................................................................................. 6

1.4 Exclusions.......................................................................................................................... 7

1.5 Credentials......................................................................................................................... 7 2 SITE SETTING.....................................................................................................................................8

2.1 Site Location and Description.......................................................................................... 8

2.2 Surrounding Properties .................................................................................................... 8

2.3 Physical Setting................................................................................................................. 9

2.3.1 Site Topography ...................................................................................................9

2.3.2 Surface Water .......................................................................................................9

2.4 Geology and Soil ............................................................................................................... 9

2.4.1 Regional Conditions.............................................................................................9

2.4.2 Site Soil Conditions..............................................................................................9

2.5 Groundwater.................................................................................................................... 10

2.5.1 Regional Conditions........................................................................................... 10

2.5.2 Site Groundwater Conditions............................................................................ 10 3 SITE RECONNAISSANCE................................................................................................................. 12

3.1 Property Description....................................................................................................... 12

3.1.1 Pin High Golf Center (Portions of Parcels 026 and 020) ................................. 12

3.1.2 Southeast “Lowland” Area (Portion of Parcel 020) ......................................... 13

3.1.3 Cell Tower Facility (Parcel 027)......................................................................... 13

3.1.4 RV Storage Yard (Portion of Parcel 026) .......................................................... 13

3.1.5 Vacant Parcels (Parcels 012, 018, and a portion of 026) ................................. 14

3.2 Hazardous Materials........................................................................................................ 14

3.2.1 Pin High Golf Center .......................................................................................... 14

3.2.2 Verizon Cell Tower Facility ................................................................................ 15

3.3 Hazardous Wastes........................................................................................................... 15

3.3.1 Pin High Golf Center .......................................................................................... 15

3.3.2 RV Storage Yard ................................................................................................. 15

3.4 ASTs, USTs, and Other Subsurface Structures ............................................................ 15

3.5 Polychlorinated Biphenyls.............................................................................................. 15

3.6 Other Potential Environmental Issues........................................................................... 16

3.7 Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACMs)......................................................................... 16

3.8 Utilities ............................................................................................................................. 16

3.8.1 Electrical Service and Natural Gas ................................................................... 16

3.8.2 Potable Water...................................................................................................... 16

3.8.3 Sanitary Sewers and Storm Drains ................................................................... 17

3.8.4 Trash Pickup and Disposal................................................................................ 17 4 HISTORICAL RECORDS REVIEW.................................................................................................... 18 Table of Contents, cont’d.

Report, Phase I ESA ii
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose

4.1 Property History Summary ............................................................................................. 18

4.2 Interviews......................................................................................................................... 19

4.3 User Questionnaire and Environmental Lien Search ................................................... 19

4.4 Historical Aerial Photographs ........................................................................................ 19

4.5 USGS Topographic Maps................................................................................................ 22

4.6 Historical City Directories............................................................................................... 23

4.7 Historical Sanborn Maps................................................................................................. 23 5 PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES ........................................................................................ 24

5.1 Prior Documents List ...................................................................................................... 24

5.2 Geotechnical Engineering Reports................................................................................ 24

5.2.1 USE (1985): Preliminary Soil & Foundation Investigation............................... 24

5.2.2 Terrasearch (1987): Geotechnical Feasibility Evaluation................................ 25

5.2.3 USE (2001): Updated Geotechnical Investigation............................................ 26

5.3 Environmental Investigation Reports ............................................................................ 26

5.3.1 E2C (1996): Phase I & II Environmental Site Assessment............................... 26

5.3.2 E2C (2004): Precursor Summary Phase I Environmental Assessment.......... 27

5.3.3 E2C (2004): Phase II Environmental Site Assessment .................................... 28

5.4 Off-Site Properties........................................................................................................... 29

5.4.1 Cisco Site 6/Syntax Court Disposal Site........................................................... 29

5.4.2 South Bay Asbestos Area.................................................................................. 30 6 AGENCY RECORDS AND DATABASES ......................................................................................... 32

6.1 Governmental Agency Records ..................................................................................... 32

6.1.1 Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD)...................................................... 32

6.1.2 Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health (SCCDEH) ........... 32

6.1.3 City of San Jose (SJ).......................................................................................... 32

6.1.4 Bay Area Air Quality Management District (AQMD)......................................... 32

6.1.5 San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)................... 32

6.1.6 CalRecycle .......................................................................................................... 33

6.1.7 California EPA, Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) ................ 33

6.2 EDR Report ...................................................................................................................... 33

6.2.1 Database Summary – Subject Property............................................................ 33

6.2.2 Database Summary – Surrounding Properties ................................................ 33 7 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.................................................................................. 36

7.1 Data Gaps......................................................................................................................... 36

7.2 Recognized Environmental Conditions......................................................................... 36

7.3 Recommendations .......................................................................................................... 37 8 LIMITATIONS..................................................................................................................................... 39 9 REFERENCES................................................................................................................................... 40 Table of Contents, cont’d.

Report, Phase I ESA iii
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose

FIGURES
1 Site Location Map
2 Site Vicinity Map

APPENDICES
A Site Photographs
B EDR Reports
C Relevant Records
D Prior Investigation Reports

ATTACHMENT
1 Professional Resumes
Report, Phase I ESA 1
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose
REPORT

PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
PIN HIGH GOLF CENTER & 3 ADJACENT PARCELS
4701 NORTH FIRST STREET

SAN JOSE, CA

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Purpose This report presents the results of a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) conducted by GEOLOGICA, INC. (GEOLOGICA) to identify Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) at or near the above-referenced site. This ESA was performed in conjunction with the pending acquisition and development of the subject property.

Scope The scope of work for this ESA was based on GEOLOGICA’S proposal to Terra Hospitality dated October 8, 2015. The scope of work was in general conformance with the requirements specified in ASTM Standard E1527-13 and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI) rule adopted in November 2013. Any exceptions to or deletions from these guidance protocols are described within this report.

General Site
Description
and
Surroundings
The approximately 36-acre property comprises of five contiguous parcels located along the south side of North First Street in the Alviso section of San Jose (the “property” or “site”). The property is identified by APNs 015-39-020 (10.3 acres), -026 (24.1 acres), and -027 (~0.1 acre), and 015-03-012 (0.6 acre) and -018 (1.4 acres). The eastern half of the site is occupied by the Pin High Golf Center, with an address of 4701 North First St. The western half of the site is occupied by an RV storage yard and a vacant lot. The surrounding area is mixed residential and commercial.

Physical
Setting
The property is situated on the coastal plain immediately south of tidal flats that fringe the southern San Francisco Bay. The topography in this part of San Jose has a very gentle slope to the north. The natural elevation of the subject property appears to range from about sea level to approximately 5 feet above mean sea level. However, the site elevation has been raised by up to 14 ft by the placement of imported fill soils during and prior to the mid-1980s. The nearest significant surface water body is the Guadalupe River, located along the southern border of the golf course. A former incised meander loop of the river is located along (and within) the southeast boundary of the subject site.

Subsurface
Conditions
Soils – Soils at the site consist of loose, moderate- to well-sorted sandy or clayey silt grading to sandy or silty clay. As noted above, up to 14 feet of fill materials have been placed on top of native soils at the site. The fill material in places contains significant accumulations of concrete and asphalt debris. USE (2001) noted that there was “a 14 feet thick concrete debris and gravel layer in the southeastern portion of the golf course and the low-lying area.” Subsurface data from the nearby Syntax Court site indicated a deeper sandy zone is present at >33 feet bgs (GEOLOGICA, 2015).

Groundwater - USE (2001) indicated that groundwater was encountered in soil borings at depths of approximately 14 to 15 feet below ground surface (bgs). In contrast, boring logs in USE (1985) indicated that groundwater was encountered at depths in the range of about 7 to 18 feet, with most logs reporting groundwater at 7 to 8 feet bgs. Although the prevailing groundwater gradient is believed to be northwesterly, the flow direction appears to have recently reversed to southeasterly, reflecting drought conditions (GEOLOGICA, 2015).

Site
Observations
The Pin High Golf Center occupies the western two-thirds of Parcel 020 and the eastern half of Parcel 026; an undeveloped “lowland” area occupies the eastern one-third of Parcel 020; an RV storage yard occupies the western half of Parcel 026; a Verizon cell phone tower facility occupies Parcel 027; and Parcels 012 and 018 are undeveloped lots at the west end of the Report, Phase I ESA 2
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose
property.

Pin High Golf Center – Most of the acreage at Pin High is devoted to a driving range, practice putting greens, and a 3-hole regulation golf course. A clubhouse is located on the western side of Pin High. A maintenance yard is located along the south property line south of the clubhouse; the yard is entirely unpaved and oil stains are common throughout. The yard includes two canopy structures. Tractors, mowers, and other equipment, some inoperative and/or partly dissembled, are parked under the canopy structures. Three 55-gallon drums of diesel fuel and waste oil were noted under the western canopy. An out-of-service diesel fuel storage tank (~100-gallon size) on steel legs is located on the south side of the storage locker.

An out-of-service irrigation water supply well is located at the far eastern corner of Pin High, adjacent to North First Street. The well was taken out of service 10-15 years ago when the City of San Jose began supplying Pin High with reclaimed municipal water for irrigation. “Lowland” Area – The southeastern portion of the property is fenced off from the Pin High property and is topographically lower than the golf course. A former section of the Guadalupe River (a meander loop) is located along the southeastern border and contains perennial water.

The area between the meander loop and the Pin High fence is overgrown with dense, native brush. Scattered trash was observed within the brush area. Large, broken pieces of concrete and asphalt associated with fill soils are exposed at the north end of the meander loop.

Cell Tower – A Verizon cellular communications facility is located along the southern property line of the subject site, south of the Pin High parking lot. The facility is enclosed by a concrete-block wall and locked chain link gate. The Verizon facility includes an airconditioned concrete blockhouse, cellular communications tower, and an emergency dieselfueled generator.

RV Storage Yard – The RV storage yard is completely enclosed by a chain link fence, with privacy slats on three sides. The yard is asphalt-paved, except for some potholes and a dirt area in the northeast corner that measures roughly 75 feet on a side. Oil stains were common on the pavement. The western two-thirds of the yard was completely empty. The eastern section of the yard contained several old RVs, several boats, a few old vehicles and truck trailers, and four roll-off dumpsters that were full of trash and debris.

Vacant Parcels – These western parcels are fenced, vacant lots. The vacant section at the east end of Moffat Street was formerly occupied by Turner Equipment and Excel Landscape. All of the vacant sections were dirt-covered with small fragments of asphalt, concrete, or rocks scattered around the surface.

Hazardous
Materials and
Wastes
Pin High Maintenance Yard - The Pin High maintenance yard contained two, old 55-gallon drums sitting on a makeshift pad over bare ground. One of the drums (no visible label) had a hand crank pump with dispenser hose affixed to the top, and the number “3” scrawled on the side. The other drum was labeled diesel #2. Three 5-gallon pails of petroleum hydrocarbon wastes were noted. One of the pails was filled with empty 1-quart motor oil containers and an old grease gun cartridge. There were 1-gallon containers of herbicide and bleach in the storage locker and other miscellaneous products in 1-gallon and smaller containers.

Cell Tower - The Verizon cell tower facility has a 210-gallon diesel fuel tank (belly tank) and lead-acid battery associated with a standby electrical generator.

RV Storage Yard - Various 5-gallon pails (most with lids), other odd sized containers, and an unlabeled 55-gallon plastic drum were staged adjacent to a half-demolished metal-sided shed.

Site History Ownership - The subject property has reportedly been under the same ownership, the Boccardo family, since approximately 1940 to the present time. Various tenants have occupied portions of the property during that time.

Historic Use - The subject property was mostly farmland from before 1939 until around 1970.

A complex of farm buildings (some of which may date back to before 1899) was located near the middle of Parcel 026 until the late 1960s or early 1970s. There were also several buildings of uncertain use on the south side of Parcel 018 from before 1939 until the late 1960s or early Report, Phase I ESA 3
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose
1970s. One or two homes were apparently present in the northwest corner of Parcel 012 from the early 1950s until the late 1970s. Parcels 012 and 018 subsequently remained vacant until the present.

Fill Placement – The site elevation has been raised over the years by fill placement. In addition, based on anecdotal information, it appears that areas in Alviso in the site vicinity were used historically, to varying degrees, as informal or formal dumping grounds for placing excess soils and demolition debris. Based on site investigations, significant amounts of fill material with incorporated concrete and asphalt debris have apparently been placed at the site over the years.

The sources of the soils and debris are largely unknown.

Recent Use - Turner Equipment and Excel Landscape first occupied their portions of Parcel 026 in the 1980s, and then vacated by about 2009. In the late 1980s to early 1990s, the middle portion of Parcel 026 was being used as a storage yard for trailers, boats, and the like, while the rest of the site was vacant. The latter storage yard was replaced by the Pin High Golf Center in 1993/1994. The existing RV storage yard in the western half of Parcel 026 opened between 1993 and 1996.

Previous
Studies
Several environmental and geotechnical investigations were conducted form 1985 – 2004. Key environmental reports included:

E2C (1996): Phase I & II Environmental Site Assessment – E2C noted in this report that some areas of Alviso were used as dumping grounds for asbestos wastes for over 30 years, and the subject site was within the bounds of the South Bay Asbestos Area, a Superfund site. Based on that, soil sampling was conducted at 15 locations to evaluate for asbestos in the onsite fill.

Sampling included the collection of 28 soil samples at various depths between 2 and 12 feet bgs. The laboratory analyses did not detect the presence of asbestos in any of the samples.

E2C (2004b): Phase II Environmental Site Assessment – This Phase II was conducted to evaluate for potential contamination at the Pin High Maintenance Area, Turner Equipment, and the vacant Parcels 012 and 018. Over 80 soil samples and three grab groundwater sample were collected. Selected samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), metals, pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Soil testing indicated: TPH as diesel and/or motor oil at certain locations in all three areas; and metals at Turner Equipment and the vacant parcels. Traces of some pesticides and PCBs were found within the vacant parcels; VOCs were not detected in any samples. No constituents of concern were detected in the three grab groundwater samples. Because RWQCB Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs) were exceeded in the three target areas, E2C recommended that soil in these areas be excavated and removed for proper disposal. This remediation was not conducted; it was reportedly deferred to site redevelopment.

Offsite Issues Two nearby sites are of interest:

Cisco Site 6 / Syntax Ct Disposal Site - The Cisco Site 6 site (also known as the Syntax Court Disposal Site) is present to the southeast adjacent to the intersection of Highway 237 and North First Street. Some amount of more formal landfilling of waste refuse occurred in the southeast portion at this property near Highway 237. The waste refuse landfilling operations are believed to have occurred in the late 1950s and 1960s, and consisted mainly of domestic-type trash buried beneath at least 2 feet of soil. The landfill site is in the process of being closed under Title 27. Shallow groundwater at the Cisco Site 6/Syntax Ct Disposal Site has been impacted by chlorinated VOCs which are believed to be sourced from the waste refuse layer in a localized area south of the former Syntax Ct, near the intersection of North First Street and Highway 237. A program of in-situ groundwater remediation by injection has recently been undertaken under the oversight of the RWQCB; this program is expected to address impacts near the source area resulting in down-gradient reductions in VOC concentrations over time.

The leading edge of a shallow groundwater VOC plume appears to extend onto the eastern edge of Parcel 020 of the subject property. The Cisco Site 6/Syntax Court Disposal Site property owners are currently working with the RWQCB, DTSC, CalRecycle, and the City of Report, Phase I ESA 4
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose
San Jose Local Enforcement Agency (LEA) to comply with Title 27 and the DTSC/RWQCB environmental requirements. Concurrently, the site is under development as an office park and hotel property.

South Bay Asbestos Area (SBAA) - The South Bay Asbestos Area (SBAA), located to the east and southeast of the property, was placed on the National Priorities List (NPL or Superfund) in 1984, and it is also in the CERCLIS database. Reportedly, prior to the 1980s, portions of the Alviso area were used as dumping grounds to combat ground subsidence and reduce flood hazards. During the 1950s, several landfills in the Alviso area accepted wastes from an asbestos cement pipe manufacturing facility. Contaminated fill was also used for raising the grade of the area and for constructing a ring-levee, which resulted in asbestos contamination being spread throughout the Alviso area by windblown dust and truck traffic on unpaved lots. The main concern within the SBAA was exposure to asbestos fibers that became airborne in dust. EPA (2015) believes that the risk of exposure to asbestos has been lowered to acceptable levels within the SBAA. The representative of the ownership, James Rees, stated that it has been determined that the subject property is not within the bounds of the former South Bay Asbestos Area.

Conclusions GEOLOGICA has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the ASTM Standard E 1527-13 for APNs 015-39-020, -026, -027 and 015-03-012 and -018 in San Jose, California. Any exceptions to, or deletions from these practices were described in this report where applicable. Based on the scope of services and limitations of this Phase I ESA, Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) were identified in connection with the subject property. The following RECs are associated with the subject site:
• Undocumented Fill and Debris – Undocumented fill, sometimes containing concrete debris and other material, reportedly underlies most or all of the property. Significant accumulations of concrete debris were noted in the southeastern portion of the Pin High facility.
• Soil – Soil samples from specific areas of the property were tested by E2C (2004); evidence of TPH and metals contamination in exceedance of RWQCB Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs) was reported. Recommendations for remediation were made by E2C, but apparently were not implemented. Oil stains on the ground and pavement at the Pin High maintenance yard and RV storage yard were observed during a site visit for the current study.
• Groundwater – Off-site shallow groundwater at the Cisco Site 6/Syntax Ct Disposal Site to the southeast has been impacted by chlorinated VOCs. These are believed to be sourced from a localized area near the intersection of North First Street and Highway 237. A program of in-situ groundwater remediation by injection has recently been undertaken by the owners of that property under the oversight of the RWQCB. The leading edge of the shallow groundwater VOC plume appears to extend onto the eastern edge of Parcel 020 of the subject property.

In addition to the above noted RECs, several environmental compliance issues were noted:
• No Hazardous Material Business Plan appears to have ever been in place with the City of San Jose or the County of Santa Clara for the Pin High Maintenance Area and associated fuel storage.
• An out-of-service irrigation well is located at the far eastern corner of the Pin High acreage, adjacent to North First Street. The well is reportedly about 150 feet deep and was installed shortly after Pin High was constructed (1993). No other construction details were available. The well was reportedly taken out of service 10 - 15 years ago when the City of San Jose installed piping to supply Pin High with reclaimed municipal water for irrigation purposes. The well was not identified on a database list of registered water supply wells in the area, suggesting that the well is not registered with the State of California Department Report, Phase I ESA 5
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose
of Water Resources (DWR). The well is currently not plumbed for on-site irrigation water supply. DWR regulations require that wells out of service for more than one year be closed.
• Two groundwater piezometers were installed by USE (1985). In 1989, an attempt was made by USE at the owner’s request to find the piezometers so that they could be properly closed. Apparently, E2C was unable to locate the peizometers, which had apparently been buried. Thus, the two piezometers at the site were never properly abandoned or closed under county permit. They may be uncovered during future grading operations.

Recommendations
We recommend a Phase II investigation to evaluate potential contamination in soil and groundwater at the site and to assess whether undocumented fill and / or groundwater may require special handling for off-site disposal if future construction /grading generates excess soil or water. GEOLOGICA recommends the following Phase II work:
• Exploratory Soil Sampling – Soil samples should be collected to evaluate for petroleum hydrocarbons and metals contamination, and other constituents when indicated. Sampling should include areas formerly identified for remediation by E2C (2004), and also selected areas across the entire site to assess the undocumented fill and provide a baseline prior to redevelopment of the property.
• Groundwater Sampling – Grab groundwater samples should be collected in selected areas of the property to evaluate for petroleum hydrocarbons, VOCs, pesticides, and metals contamination and to provide a baseline prior to redevelopment of the property.

GEOLOGICA also recommends the following:
• Soil Management Plan – Given the unknown nature of the fill materials at the site and detections in previous environmental investigations, development of a formal Soil Management Plan in association with future property redevelopment may be appropriate.

The plan would establish appropriate measures to be taken to manage soils that may contain residual levels of potential contaminants that could be present in soils and/or groundwater on the property and procedures in the event that unforeseen conditions are encountered. Issues to be covered might include soil management, stockpiling, soil profiling to ensure proper soil disposal, and appropriate implementation of worker safety measures.
• Closure of Irrigation Well – Unmaintained, out-of-service wells can become conduits for vertical migration of contaminants. If the well is not going to be used or properly maintained, it should probably be formally decommissioned by a licensed well driller. • Pin High Maintenance Yard – If the Pin High facility is going to continue to operate, we recommend improving housekeeping practices in the maintenance yard with regard to storage of petroleum products and hazardous chemicals. This would include use of proper spill containment pallets for 55-gallon drums and small containers. Pin High should also assess whether a Hazardous Materials Business Plan (HMBP) is currently required by making inquiry with the Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health (SCCDEH).

Report, Phase I ESA 6
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose
1 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by GEOLOGICA, INC. (GEOLOGICA) at the request of Mr. Jag Kapoor of Terra Hospitality, Inc. This ESA was conducted for a 36-acre property located in the Alviso section San Jose, California (“subject property” or “site”). The general location of the property is shown on Figure 1. It is our understanding that the ESA has been requested in connection with the acquisition and development of the subject property by Terra Hospitality.

1.1 Guidance Protocol
The scope of work for this ESA was based on GEOLOGICA’s proposal to Terra Hospitality, Inc. dated October 8, 2015. The scope of work was in general conformance with the requirements specified in ASTM Standard E1527-13, including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI) rule adopted in November 2013. Any exceptions to or deletions from these guidance protocols are described within this report.

1.2 Purpose
The purpose of this Phase I ESA was to review past and present land use practices and activities at and near the subject property for evidence of Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) that could result in impacts to soil, soil vapor, surface water, and/or groundwater at, beneath, or originating from the subject property. The end result of this Phase I ESA is a listing of identified RECs, defined by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) as “the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property due to a release to the environment; under conditions indicative of a release to the environment or under conditions that pose a material threat of future release. De minimis conditions are not recognized environmental conditions.” ASTM Standard E1527-13 also defines a Controlled Recognized Environmental Condition (CREC) as the condition where a previous release at a property was granted a risk-based closure, but the contaminants were allowed to remain in place under certain restrictions or conditions. The ASTM Standard specifies that a Historical Recognized Environmental Condition (HREC) is one where a past release was addressed at a property to a level that allows for unrestricted residential use.

1.3 Scope of Services
This Phase I ESA was accomplished through, and limited to, the following tasks:
• Interviews with knowledgeable personnel;
• Site walk-through and windshield survey of the surrounding vicinity; • Review of records reasonably available at local and regional public agencies through office visits, telephone contacts, website research, and environmental database search; Report, Phase I ESA 7
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose
• Investigation of site history through interviews and review of readily available historical documentation such as: a) aerial photos, b) topographic maps, c) Sanborn fire insurance maps, d) city directories, e) agency files, and f) previous site investigation documents; and
• Review of readily available documentation from standard resources regarding environmental, physiographic, geologic, and hydrogeologic conditions.

1.4 Exclusions
The sampling of air, soil, groundwater, surface water, drinking water, suspect asbestoscontaining materials, lead-based paint, or laboratory testing for hydrocarbons, lead, radon, or other compounds was not included as a part of our scope of services, nor is the sampling and testing of these materials within the normal scope of a Phase I ESA. This ESA did not constitute a comprehensive regulatory compliance, endangered species, wetlands, indoor air quality, or high-voltage power line audit.

1.5 Credentials
This report has been prepared under the professional supervision of the principal(s) whose signature(s) appear herein. The information contained in this report has received appropriate technical review and approval. The conclusions represent professional judgments and are founded upon the findings of the investigations identified in the report and the interpretation of such data based on our experience and expertise according to the existing standards of care for work of this kind. Resumes of the professionals involved in preparing this report are included in Attachment 1 at the end of this report.

Report, Phase I ESA 8
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose
2 SITE SETTING

2.1 Site Location and Description
The site comprises approximately 36 acres and is located in the northern (Alviso) part of San Jose (Figure 1). The property is identified by Santa Clara County Assessor’s parcel numbers:
• 015-39-020 (10.3 acres) referred to herein as “Parcel 020”; • 015-39-026 (24.1 acres) referred to herein as “Parcel 026”; • 015-39-027 (~0.1 acre) referred to herein as “Parcel 027”; • 015-03-012 (0.6 acre) referred to herein as “Parcel 012”; and, • 015-03-018 (1.4 acres) referred to herein as “Parcel 018”.

Representative photos of the property are included in Appendix A. The Pin High Golf Center (4701 N. First Street) occupies the western two-thirds of Parcel 020 and the eastern half of Parcel 026; an recreational vehicle (RV) storage yard occupies the western half of Parcel 026; a Verizon cell phone tower facility occupies Parcel 027; and Parcels 012 and 018 are undeveloped lots at the west end of the property. The elongated, irregularly-shaped site is bounded on the north by North First Street, on the west by Liberty Street, on the south by Moffat Street and the Guadalupe River channel, and on the east by undeveloped land (Figure 2).

2.2 Surrounding Properties
The surrounding area includes vacant land, land under development, and mixed use developments such as a school, public library, residential, storage yards, and retail. Adjacent properties are identified on Figure 2. The property is bordered by the following developments/land uses:
• East – The site is bordered on the east by vacant land owned by the State, and by vacant land that is being developed in phases as an office business park with a hotel. • West – The site is bordered on the west by Liberty Street, beyond which are homes, the Alviso Community Center, the Alviso Health Center, and a gated and fenced parking lot. • North – The site is bordered on the north by North First Street, beyond which are, from east to west, an elementary school, youth center, public library, two residential subdivisions and, at the northeast corner of First and Liberty Streets, a small retail center.
• South – The eastern half of the site is bordered on the south by the channelized Guadalupe River with an adjacent paved bicycle trail along the riverfront. The western half of the site is bordered on the south by Moffat Street, dilapidated homes, Tri-Valley Excavation, and several storage yards.

Report, Phase I ESA 9
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose

2.3 Physical Setting

2.3.1 SITE TOPOGRAPHY
The property is located at the north end of the Santa Clara Valley. The property is situated on the coastal plain immediately south of tidal flats that fringe the southern San Francisco Bay.

The topography in this part of San Jose has a very gentle slope to the north. However, the Diablo Range is located only about six miles to the east. Based on review of the U.S.

Geological Survey’s Milpitas topographic quadrangle (USGS, 1980), the natural elevation of the subject property appears to range from about sea level to approximately 5 feet above mean sea level. However, the site elevation has been raised by the placement of imported fill soils during and prior to the mid-1980s reportedly to reduce the flood hazard. A geotechnical report for the subject site prepared by Terrasearch (1987) noted that this site was previously “at or below sea level, and the present topography is the result of a continuing program of land fill.” Terrasearch (1987) reported 1 to 10 feet of uncompacted fill material across the whole property. The fill material in places contains significant accumulations of concrete and asphalt debris. USE (2001) noted that there was “a 14 feet thick concrete debris and gravel layer in the southeastern portion of the golf course and the low-lying area.”

2.3.2 SURFACE WATER
The nearest significant surface water body is the channelized Guadalupe River, located along the southern border of the golf course (Figure 2). A former incised meander loop of the river is located along (and within) the southeast boundary of the subject site. This former channel segment is isolated from the present-day river channel. The channel segment apparently intersects the water table and contains several feet of perennial standing water.

2.4 Geology and Soil

2.4.1 REGIONAL CONDITIONS
The San Francisco Bay region, including Santa Clara Valley, is part of the Coast Ranges geomorphic province of California. This province is characterized by northwest-trending ridges and valleys. The Diablo Range borders the eastern side of Santa Clara Valley. This mountain range is cored by rocks of the Franciscan Complex that are structurally overlain by the Coast Range Ophiolite and marine clastic rocks of the Mesozoic-age Great Valley Sequence (Wentworth, et al, 1999). The Calaveras and Hayward faults are major active faults that transect the southwestern front of the Diablo Mountains.

2.4.2 SITE SOIL CONDITIONS
The subject site is located on a coastal plain near the tidal flats of the southern San Francisco Bay. Surficial sediments at the site have been classified as Holocene-age levee deposits, Report, Phase I ESA 10
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose
consisting of loose, moderate- to well-sorted sandy or clayey silt grading to sandy or silty clay (Helley et al, 1994). The former river channel at the southeast end of the site is mapped as a floodplain deposit (Helley et al, 1994).

As noted above, up to 14 feet of fill materials have been placed on top of native soils at the site.

Terrasearch (1987) reports:
“the entire site is covered with uncompacted fill and rubble ranging from 1 to 10 feet in thickness. Approximately 90% of the rubble consists of non-degradable broken concrete slabs. Beneath the fill, the native soils consist of basically medium stiff sandy silty clays with some local soft pockets.”
USE (2001) indicated that the entire south half of the golf course is underlain by fill containing “concrete debris and gravel,” and describes native site soils as “stiff silty clay” to a depth of at least 35 feet. In a previous geotechnical report for the site, USE (1985) noted that “at the time of our investigation, various organic debris, concrete blocks, and other refuse were being added to extend the fill area still further” to the southeast in Parcel 020.

2.5 Groundwater
The following sections discuss regional and local groundwater conditions.

2.5.1 REGIONAL CONDITIONS
The site is located within the Santa Clara Valley Groundwater Basin. The water-bearing formations of the basin comprise two principle units: the Plio-Pleistocene age Santa Clara Formation and younger alluvium of Pleistocene to Holocene age (California Dept. of Water Resources [CDWR], 2004). The combined thickness of these two units probably exceeds 1,500 feet. The alluvium is the most important water-bearing unit in the Santa Clara Basin, and all large production wells derive their water from it (CDWR, 2004). The alluvium is generally comprised of unconsolidated gravel, sand, silt, and clay deposited principally as a series of convergent alluvial fans.

The prevailing regional groundwater gradient is believed to be northwesterly parallel to the Guadalupe River, and towards San Francisco Bay.

2.5.2 SITE GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS
Shallow (First) Groundwater - USE (2001) indicated that groundwater was encountered in soil borings at depths of approximately 14 to 15 feet below ground surface (bgs). In contrast, boring logs in USE (1985) indicated that groundwater was encountered at depths in the range of about 7 to 18 feet, with most logs reporting groundwater at 7 to 8 feet bgs. Boring logs by Report, Phase I ESA 11
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose
Terrasearch (1987) reported that groundwater was encountered at depths in the range of 5 to 16 feet bgs. Shallow groundwater beneath the site is not a source of drinking water.

Deeper Groundwater – Subsurface data from the adjacent Syntax Court site indicated a deeper groundwater-bearing sandy zone is present at >33 feet bgs (GEOLOGICA, 2015). The deeper zone was found to be physically separated from the shallow groundwater-bearing zone by a 5 to 10-foot thick silt and clay horizon. Analyses of groundwater grab samples indicated that the deeper zone has higher salinity than the shallow groundwater (chloride concentrations up to 8,400 mg/L versus 2,000 mg/L, respectively). This suggests that the deeper zone has been impacted by salt water intrusion from San Francisco Bay.

Groundwater Flow Direction - Although the prevailing groundwater gradient is believed to be northwesterly parallel to the Guadalupe River, and towards San Francisco Bay, monitoring well data from the nearby Syntax Court site to the southeast (Figure 2) indicated that the site flow direction in shallow groundwater appears to have reversed in the last few years to be southeasterly, probably reflecting drought conditions (GEOLOGICA, 2015).

Report, Phase I ESA 12
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose
3 SITE RECONNAISSANCE
A site reconnaissance was conducted on October 23, 2015 by GEOLOGICA Principal, Brian Aubry, PG, and Senior Geologist, Mark Hallee, PG. Site access was provided by Mr. Don Rumpf, the operator of the Pin High Golf Center since 1993. Observations noted during the site visit are summarized below. The site layout is shown on Figure 2. Representative photographs of the site are included in Appendix A.

3.1 Property Description
The site comprises a number of different land uses, each of which is described separately below.

3.1.1 PIN HIGH GOLF CENTER (PORTIONS OF PARCELS 026 AND 020) The Pin High Gold Center (Pin High) occupies a reported 17.5 acres in the eastern half of Parcel 026 and the western portion of Parcel 020. Most of the acreage at Pin High is devoted to a driving range, practice putting greens, and 3-hole regulation golf course. A clubhouse is located on the western side of the Pin High site. The clubhouse includes a small Pro Shop, restaurant/snack bar with outdoor patio, men and women restrooms, several offices, and small workshop for repairing golf clubs. An asphalt-paved parking lot and an unpaved overflow lot are located on the west side of the clubhouse. A maintenance yard is located along the south property line south of the clubhouse, adjacent to a Verizon cell tower facility (Parcel 027).

Between the maintenance yard and clubhouse is a concrete wash-down pad equipped with a hose bib where mowers are washed. Drainage from the pad runs off onto the adjacent soil.

Two old trailers and a large stack of railroad ties are located adjacent to the wash pad. An outof-service irrigation well, and associated steel storage tank, are located at the far eastern corner of the Pin High acreage, adjacent to North First Street. According to Mr. Rumpf, the well is about 150 feet deep and was installed shortly after Pin High was constructed (1993). No other information was available regarding well construction. The well was reportedly taken out of service 10 - 15 years ago when the City of San Jose installed piping to supply Pin High with reclaimed municipal water for irrigation purposes. The well was not identified on the EDR list of water supply wells presented in Appendix B, suggesting that the well is not registered with the State of California. Mr. Rumpf said the well is not capped, though it is currently not plumbed for water supply use.

Maintenance Yard - The Pin High maintenance yard is entirely unpaved; oil stains are common throughout. The yard includes two canopy structures. Tractors, mowers, and various other equipment, some inoperative and/or partly dissembled, are parked under the canopy structures.

Carpet mats were laid down over some sections of the dirt floor, apparently to intercept oil leakage from the equipment. There are also work benches, storage shelves, and tool cabinets under the eastern canopy structure. A Porta-Potty and three 55-gallon drums of diesel fuel and waste oil were noted under the western canopy. A walk-in storage locker is located adjacent to Report, Phase I ESA 13
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose
the western canopy. The storage locker contained hand tools, employee lockers, an old desk, numerous old, 5-gallon plastic gasoline cans, and various supplies such as fertilizer, weed killer, motor oil, bleach, grass seed, etc. An out-of-service diesel fuel storage tank (~100-gallon size) is located on the south side of the storage locker. The tank sits about five feet off the ground, supported by rusty steel legs.

3.1.2 SOUTHEAST “LOWLAND” AREA (PORTION OF PARCEL 020)
The southeastern one-third of Parcel 020 is fenced off from the Pin High golf facility property and is apparently a designated wetland area regulated under U.S. Army Corps of Engineers jurisdiction. This area is a lowland area topographically lower than the golf course.

Former Meander Loop - A former section of the Guadalupe River (a meander loop) is located along the southeastern border of Parcel 020 and contains perennial ponded water, presumably because the channel intersects the local water table. Meander loops of this configuration are sometimes called “ox bow lakes” and this is apparently a remnant of the former Guadalupe River that was not filled in at the time of channelization (early 1960s). In this case, the former meander loop has topographically-high earthen levees along each of its banks, isolating it from the adjacent engineered channel of the river, as well as making it difficult to see until you are next to it or above it. The meander loop had formerly extended into the adjacent property on the east, but was filled in by that property owner sometime prior to the 1980s. Large pieces of broken concrete and asphalt within the fill are exposed at the north end of the meander loop in Parcel 020.

The lowland area between the meander loop and the Pin High fence is overgrown with dense, native brush. Scattered recent trash was observed within the brush area, and there were two places along a path where numerous old style glass bottles and jars had been collected and apparently “stashed.”

3.1.3 CELL TOWER FACILITY (PARCEL 027)
A Verizon cellular communications facility is located along the southern property line of the subject site, south of the Pin High parking lot. There was no access into this facility. The facility is enclosed by a concrete-block wall and locked chain link gate. The Verizon facility includes an air-conditioned concrete blockhouse, cellular communications tower, and an emergency diesel-fueled generator. The emergency generator is discussed further in Section

3.2.2. This facility pre-dates Pin High, according to Mr. Rumpf.

3.1.4 RV STORAGE YARD (PORTION OF PARCEL 026)
An RV storage yard occupies the western half of Parcel 026, bordered by First Street on the north and Moffat Street on the south. The rectangular yard is completely enclosed by a chain link fence, with privacy slats on three sides. The yard is asphalt-paved, except for some Report, Phase I ESA 14
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose
potholes and a dirt area in the northeast corner that measures roughly 75 feet on a side. Oil stains were commonly observed on the pavement. At the time of our visit, most of the yard had been vacated and there were several workers and a backhoe continuing with the yard cleanup.

The western two-thirds of the yard was completely empty. The ongoing cleanup was focused on the eastern one-third of the yard. The eastern section of the yard contained several old RVs, several boats, a few old vehicles and truck trailers, and four roll-off dumpsters that were full of trash and debris. Several piles of trash and scrap metal were also noted. Portable, external generators were running at two of the RVs, suggesting that they were occupied. There were no utilities such as water or electricity at the RV yard. High-voltage, overhead power lines cross through the middle of the yard in a northeast-southwest direction.

3.1.5 VACANT PARCELS (PARCELS 012, 018, AND A PORTION OF 026) Parcels 012, 018, and a small portion of 026 are fenced, vacant lots that could not be entered.

However, the lots were easily viewed from outside the fence. Parcels 012 and 018, located between the RV storage yard and Liberty Street, are fenced as a single lot. The vacant section of Parcel 026 is located at the east end of Moffat Street. According to E2C (2004), Turner Equipment and Excel Landscaping formerly operated at this location as described in Section

4.1. All of the vacant sections were dirt-covered with small fragments of asphalt, concrete, or rocks scattered around the surface. Parcels 012 and 018 appear to have been disked earlier in the year and had little vegetation cover or trash. The Parcel 026 lot contained actively growing tumbleweeds, and several trees and tall shrub and a small soil pile. The source of the soil pile was not evident.

3.2 Hazardous Materials
The following subsections discuss hazardous materials observed during the site visit.

3.2.1 PIN HIGH GOLF CENTER
The Pin High maintenance yard contained two, old 55-gallon drums sitting on a makeshift pad over bare ground under the western canopy. One of the drums (no visible label) had a hand crank pump with dispenser hose affixed to the top, and the number “3” scrawled on the side of the drum. The other drum was labeled diesel #2. We also noted 1-gallon and quart containers of motor oil and retail size (e.g., spray cans) of other vehicle maintenance products such as WD40. We observed four lead-acid batteries sitting on shelves and in other locations in the maintenance yard. Within the storage locker, there were 1-gallon containers of herbicide and bleach in the storage locker and other miscellaneous products in 1-gallon and smaller containers. Fuel for the gasoline-powered equipment (e.g., mowers) is reportedly purchased offsite in 5-gallon containers when needed. Some of the 5-gallon containers observed in the storage locker probably held gasoline. There does not appear to have ever been a Hazardous Materials Business Plan in place for Pin High with the City of San Jose or Santa Clara County; thus, the facility has been out of compliance for some time with regard to hazardous material Report, Phase I ESA 15
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose

3.2.2 VERIZON CELL TOWER FACILITY
The Hazardous Materials Business Plan for the Verizon cell tower facility indicates that there is a 210-gallon diesel fuel tank (belly tank) and lead-acid battery associated with the standby electrical generator. The generator was observed from the front gate of the facility during our site visit and it appeared to be in good condition.

3.3 Hazardous Wastes
The following subsections discuss hazardous wastes observed during the site visit.

3.3.1 PIN HIGH GOLF CENTER
The Pin High maintenance yard contained an unlabeled 55-gallon drum and three 5-gallon pails of petroleum hydrocarbon wastes (mostly motor oil) under the western canopy structure. One of the pails was filled with empty 1-quart motor oil containers and an empty grease gun cartridge.

These containers and the drum were grouped together on a rubber mat with 4 x 4 timbers acting as secondary containments curbs. No significant staining was observed around this hazardous waste storage area. We also observed an old lead-acid battery sitting out in the open on a piece of lumber.

3.3.2 RV STORAGE YARD
At the RV storage yard we observed a grouping of various 5-gallon pails (most with lids), other odd sized containers, and an unlabeled 55-gallon plastic drum staged adjacent to a halfdemolished metal-sided shed. We presume that these wastes consist mostly of motor oil, antifreeze, paint, etc. that was left behind by former tenants, and that they will be properly disposed offsite as part of the ongoing RV yard cleanup.

3.4 ASTs, USTs, and Other Subsurface Structures
No evidence of underground storage tanks (USTs) or other subsurface containment structures was noted at the site. Aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) at Pin High include the out-of-service diesel AST in the maintenance yard (~100-gallon size) and a water AST associated with the outof-service irrigation well in the eastern corner of the property. Mr. Rumpf could not recall when either of the ASTs was last used.

3.5 Polychlorinated Biphenyls
There was no evidence of potential PCB-containing electrical or hydraulic equipment at the property. A pad-mounted electrical transformer with a PG&E label is located on the south side of the Pin High clubhouse. This transformer was presumably installed when Pin High was constructed in 1993, so is unlikely to contain PCBs.

Report, Phase I ESA 16
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose

3.6 Other Potential Environmental Issues
No evidence of USTs, vent pipes, fill pipes, drains, subgrade clarifiers, monitoring wells, pools of liquid, odors, septic tanks, or suspicious patches in the pavement was observed during the site visit. No distressed vegetation or unusual stains were observed except for the oil stains in the Pin High maintenance area and in the RV storage yard. No evidence of onsite waste disposal was noted. Two piezometers were reportedly installed in Parcels 026 and 020 in 1985 by USE (1985). Based on documentation provided by a representative of the current owner, James Rees, in 1989, the company that installed the piezometers, United Soil Engineering (USE), was requested to remove those wells by the owners. However, USE was unable to find the piezometers and concluded that they had been covered over by soil and lost. We did not find the piezometers during our site visit. There is no evidence that the piezometers were properly abandoned / closed under permit.

3.7 Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACMs)
GEOLOGICA performed a visual building survey of accessible areas for damaged suspect friable and non-friable ACMs during the site reconnaissance.
• Friable materials can be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure when dry.
• Non-friable materials are those in which the fibers have been locked in by a bonding agent, coating, or binder, and may not release fibers during normal use and handling.

Improper handling of non-friable ACMs, such as grinding or sanding, will render those materials friable.

The use of ACMs in the building industry was phased out during the 1970s. Based on the age of the Pin High clubhouse (1993), ACMs are unlikely to be present. The EPA recommends treating all building materials as suspect ACMs unless proven otherwise. Any suspect ACMs should be evaluated and handled in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local regulations prior to remodeling or renovations. Potential ACM observed during our site visit included only wallboard. Mr. Rumpf had no knowledge of potential ACMs at the property.

3.8 Utilities

3.8.1 ELECTRICAL SERVICE AND NATURAL GAS
Electrical service and natural gas for this area are provided by PG&E.

3.8.2 POTABLE WATER
Potable water is provided by the City of San Jose Municipal Water System.

Report, Phase I ESA 17
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose

3.8.3 SANITARY SEWERS AND STORM DRAINS
Public sewers and storm drains are maintained by the City of San Jose. The Pin High property has storm drains at various locations throughout. Mr. Rumpf indicated that he believes these drains empty into the municipal system and ultimately flow to the bay.

3.8.4 TRASH PICKUP AND DISPOSAL
Trash disposal service is provided by the municipal contractor, Garden City Sanitation.

Report, Phase I ESA 18
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose
4 HISTORICAL RECORDS REVIEW
This section summarizes information about the history and development of the property. The history discussion is based upon a review of aerial photographs, topographic maps, Sanborn maps, and city directories provided by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR). Information may also have been obtained from agency files, prior environmental reports, and interviews with knowledgeable individuals. Appendix B includes copies of the historical records provided by EDR.

4.1 Property History Summary
Ownership - The subject property has reportedly been under the same ownership, the Boccardo family, since approximately 1940 to the present time. Various tenants have occupied portions of the property during that time.

Historic Use - The subject property was mostly farmland from before 1939 until around 1970.

A complex of farm buildings (some of which may date back to before 1899) was located near the middle of parcel 026 until the late 1960s or early 1970s. There were also several buildings of uncertain use on the south side of parcel 018 from before 1939 until the late 1960s or early 1970s. One or two inferred homes were present in the northwest corner of parcel 012 from the early 1950s until the late 1970s. Parcels 012 and 018 subsequently remained vacant until the present.

Fill Placement / Dumping – Terrasearch (1987) noted that this site was previously “at or below sea level, and the present topography is the result of a continuing program of land fill.” In addition, based on anecdotal information, it appears that areas in Alviso in the site vicinity were used historically, to varying degrees, as informal or formal dumping grounds for excess soils and demolition debris. In the case of the subject property, this dumping comprised primarily soil with incorporated asphalt and concrete chunks. The Syntax Court Waste Disposal site is situated to the west of the property, near the intersection of Highway 237 and North First Street (see Section 5.4.1). In addition, asbestos wastes were apparently dumped in the acreage to the east of the site for over 30 years, and that property was identified as the South Bay Asbestos Area, a Superfund site (see Section 5.4.2). It has been determined that the subject property is not within the bounds of either the Sytnax Court Disposal Site or the South Bay Asbestos Area.

However, based on site investigations described in Section 5.2, significant amounts of fill material with incorporated concrete and asphalt debris have apparently been placed at the site over the years. The sources of the soils and debris are largely unknown. Fill may have started to be placed in Parcel 020 and in the eastern half of Parcel 026 in the 1960s, about the time when the Guadalupe River was channelized. Additional fill may have been placed starting in the late 1970s and extending to the late 1980s.

Report, Phase I ESA 19
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose
Recent Use - Turner Equipment and Excel Landscape first occupied their portions of Parcel 026 in the 1980s, and then vacated by about 2009. In the late 1980s to early 1990s, the middle portion of Parcel 026 was being used as a storage yard for trailers, boats, and the like, while the rest of the site was vacant. The latter storage yard was replaced by the Pin High Golf Center in 1993/1994. The existing RV storage yard in the western half of parcel 026 opened between 1993 and 1996.

4.2 Interviews
Mr. Hallee and Mr. Aubry interviewed Mr. Don Rumpf, proprietor of the Pin High Golf Center, during our site visit. In addition, Mr. Aubry interviewed a representative of the property owner, Mr. James Rees of Boccardo Management Corp. and visited Mr. Rees office to review files.

Information obtained from these interviews and file review has been included elsewhere in this report where appropriate.

4.3 User Questionnaire and Environmental Lien Search
A User Questionnaire, as presented in ASTM E1527-13, was completed by Mr. Nick Whitstone, Vice President of CBRE. Mr. Whitstone was unaware of any environmental liens, activity or use limitations (AULs), or any encumbrances to the property. Furthermore, no environmental liens or AULs were found in an environmental lien search for the property parcels conducted for GEOLOGICA by AFX Title LLC. The completed questionnaire and AFX environmental lien reports are included in Appendix C.

4.4 Historical Aerial Photographs
EDR provided GEOLOGICA with historical aerial photographs from 1939, 1948, 1950, 1956, 1968, 1974, 1979, 1982, 1993, 1998, 2005, 2006, 2009, 2010, and 2012. These photos are included in Appendix B. Our review of those records is described in the following paragraphs. • 1939 - The 1939 aerial photograph shows the subject property and surroundings to be farmland. Parcel 026 consists of a number of rectangular cultivated fields. Parcel 020 appears to be fallow, and Parcels 012 and 018 do not appear to be farmed. A slough, as depicted on the current Assessor’s parcel map (Appendix C), runs east-west along the border between parcels 020 and 026. The slough appears to connect on the west with a former meander loop of the Guadalupe River that abuts the south side of Parcel 026. A tree-lined driveway enters the mid-section of Parcel 026 from 1st Street and leads to a group of farm buildings on the south side of that parcel. A small orchard is present on the west side of the farm buildings. A faintly visible driveway enters the eastern part of parcel 020 from 1st Street and leads to an isolated small building or shed. A meandering reach of the Guadalupe River occupies the southeast side of Parcel 020. Most of the land between the southern border of the site and the Guadalupe River appears to not be cultivated. A single, barn-sized building sits directly south of the western part of Parcel 026 and appears to be accessed from Liberty Street by a dirt driveway. A group of Report, Phase I ESA 20
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose
buildings of uncertain affinity is present in the southern part of Parcel 018 facing the future Moffat Street, and two isolated small buildings are present in the northern half of the parcel. Parcel 012 is vacant. There is a building directly south of Parcel 018 and several buildings on the west side of Liberty Street opposite Parcels 012 and 018. The north side of 1st Street is mostly cultivated fields.
• 1948 - The 1948 aerial photo shows minor changes compared to 1939. The small orchard is gone from parcel 026. Parcel 020 appears to be under cultivation. The slough along the border between Parcels 020 and 026 is much more evident in this photo, with a bright reflective texture delineating the axis of the slough. A small pond appears to be present at the west end of the slough. There are additional small buildings in parcel 018.

Parcel 012 remains vacant. Moffat Street extends a short distance east of Liberty Street and there are buildings of varying sizes along the south side of Moffat. There are also several additional buildings along the north side of 1st Street. • 1950 - There is little significant change evident on the aerial photo from 1950. Parcel 020 does not appear to be under cultivation. There appears to be ground surface disturbance (grading or plowing) in parts of Parcels 012 and 018. Several additional buildings are present along the south side of Moffat Street. • 1956 - The 1956 air photo shows that Parcels 020 and 026 are under cultivation, including the former slough that previously separated the two parcels. There appear to be two buildings at the northwest corner of Parcel 012, both within the parcel. Parcel 012 and most of the north half of parcel 018 appear to otherwise be vacant. Mayne Elementary School is present on the north side of 1st Street. There are also several commercial buildings on the north side of 1st Street opposite Parcel 012. • 1968 - The 1968 aerial photo shows that the western half of Parcel 026 is under cultivation, but the eastern half and Parcel 020 appears to be fallow. There is a cluster of light colored, roughly circular objects in the southeast corner of Parcel 026 that might be soil piles. An apparent dirt road off of 1st Street runs through the east side of the inferred dirt piles. The latter road connects with another dirt road (or levee) that runs east-southeast across the property from near the east end of Moffat Street. These roads might be construction-related, because the Guadalupe River has been realigned to a new, engineered channel. A former meander loop of the river at the southeast end of parcel 020 has been cut-off and isolated from the new river channel. Water is evident in the cut-off meander loop. Due to poor photo quality, it is not clear whether there are still buildings in the south part of Parcel 018, or whether the farm buildings are still present in the mid-section of Parcel 026. There appears to be ground disturbance in Parcels 012 and 018, and a dirt trail/road is evident running north-south through both parcels. There are two commercial buildings on the adjacent property on the east side of Parcel 026.

There is a new commercial development on the north side of 1st Street opposite the midsection of Parcel 026. An apparent auto salvage yard is present on the south side of Moffat Street, opposite Parcel 026.
• 1974 - The 1974 air photo shows generally similar conditions at the site and adjacent properties as in 1968. Parcels 020 and 026 are fallow. The farm buildings are no longer present in the mid-section of Parcel 026. Small, rectangular, light colored objects (hay Report, Phase I ESA 21
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose
bales?) are visible along the boundary between Parcels 020 and 026. There is also surface disturbance at the east end of Parcel 026, exposing irregular patches of light colored soil. It appears that fill is being placed on the adjacent property on the east side of Parcel 026, and the former meander loop on that property has been filled in. The buildings are gone from the southern part of Parcel 018, but several smaller, truck-sized objects are visible along the south boundary of that parcel. A house is evident off the northwest corner of parcel 012. Most of the ground surface in Parcels 012 and 018 appears to be disturbed and uneven.
• 1979/1982 - The 1979 and 1982 air photos indicate little change to the site or adjacent properties compared to 1974. The entire subject site appears to be fallow. The inferred homes appear to be gone from the northwest corner of Parcel 012. In 1982, there appears to be a building and several smaller structures present in the portion of Parcel 026 occupied by Turner Equipment and Excel Landscape. There are bright areas of apparent surface disturbance at the eastern end of Parcel 026 and western end of parcel 020. These areas appear to consist of groups of clusters composed of small circular features that could be piles of soil. A possible vehicle trail or haul road, connecting to 1st Street at either end, roughly bisects the bright clusters. The adjacent property on the east appears to be an open-air storage yard for rows of unidentified objects. The preexisting buildings also remain on the latter property. A commercial facility on the north side of 1st Street, opposite the mid-section of the site, appears to be gone. • 1993 - The 1993 photo shows several changes to the site and surroundings compared to 1982. An area encompassing the future Pin High parking lot, and extending to the south boundary of Parcel 026, appears to be a storage yard. There are numerous square and rectangular objects in the yard that are about the size of truck trailers. There are also similar type objects in the adjacent portion of the site on the south side of Moffat Street.

All other parts of the site appear to be vacant land. The Pin High clubhouse and driving range are not yet present. The adjacent property on the east and most of the north side of 1st Street are also vacant. The auto salvage yard is gone from the south side of Moffat Street. Water is present in the former meander loop on the southeast edge of parcel 020.

Regarding the storage yards noted above, Terrasearch (1987) reported “A variety of existing structures are located on the southwestern corners of the property… Some of these structures are mobile. Additionally, the area adjacent and to the east of these lots is being used as storage facilities for mobile trailers and dry storage for a variety of boat types.”
• 1998 - The 1998 air photo is very poor quality, but shows that the Pin High clubhouse and driving range are present, and the parking lot matches the current configuration.

The RV storage lot in the western part of Parcel 026 is also present, but nothing in storage can be identified on the photo.
• 2005/2012 - The 2005 through 2012 photos show the site and surroundings to be generally similar throughout that period. The Pin High Golf Center, RV storage yard, and cell tower facility are present. Parcels 012 and 018 are vacant, graded lots. The southeast portion of Parcel 020 adjacent to the former meander loop is vacant and apparently unused. The section of the subject site on the south side of Moffat Street Report, Phase I ESA 22
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose
(Turner Equipment and Excel Landscape) contained numerous small buildings and rectangular objects (trailers or storage lockers?) in 2005 and 2006, but was largely vacant by 2009 and thereafter. Surrounding properties appear to be the same as the current developments described in Section 2.2.

4.5 USGS Topographic Maps
EDR provided GEOLOGICA with historical USGS topographic maps that dated from 1899, 1953, 1961, 1968, 1973, and 1980. Our review of those records is described in the following bullets. • 1899 - The 1899 topographic map shows that 1st Street was present, with scattered small buildings along it. Liberty Street is also present and small buildings are indicated along either side of that road. There are short roads leading off the southwest side of 1st Street at the approximate middle and east end of the subject site. Small buildings (home or farm) are shown at the ends of each of the latter roads. Most of the subject site and adjacent properties are otherwise depicted as vacant land. Agricultural use was not indicated. The Guadalupe River is shown in its natural channel meandering along the southwest and southeast sides of the site.
• 1953 - The 1953 map depicts the site and adjacent properties as mostly undeveloped land. The short road near the east end of the site is no longer present, but the one near the middle of the site remains, and there are two small buildings at the end of that street (within the subject site). Moffat Street is also present and small buildings are indicated along either side of that road. High-voltage power lines are shown crossing through the western part of the subject site in a northeast-southwest direction. First Street has been improved and is labeled as Hwy 9. Orchards are depicted in the general area, but row crops are not shown.
• 1961 - The 1961 topographic map depicts the site similar to the 1953 map, except that the short road entering the middle of the site, and the associated buildings, are no longer present. The surroundings are also little changed except on the north side of 1st Street, where the Mayne Elementary School, library, and several small buildings are now present. A disconnected, secondary meander channel is depicted along the north side of the Guadalupe River. The secondary channel extends into the southern part of the subject property.
• 1968 - The 1968 map shows that the subject site remains undeveloped land. Adjacent properties are also unchanged compared to 1961. The Guadalupe River has been straightened and channelized, but an arcuate length of the former channel along the southeastern boundary of the site has apparently not been filled in. The secondary meander noted on the 1961 map has been filled in. All that remains of the meander is a small, circular pond in the south-central part of the subject site. • 1973/1980 - The 1973 and 1980 topographic maps depict little change compared to 1968. The subject site is shown as undeveloped. On the 1980 map, two small buildings are depicted on the adjacent property to the east. The 1980 map indicates that a section of the former river channel (meander loop) directly southeast of the site has been filled in, but not the contiguous channel segment located within the subject site.

Report, Phase I ESA 23
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose

4.6 Historical City Directories
EDR researched the known addresses for the subject site using historical Haines Criss-Cross Directories for the period of 1970 to 2011. The directories were generally reviewed at five-year intervals. The results have been compiled by EDR into a City Directory Abstract (Appendix B). The listings for 4701 N. 1st Street are:
• Pin High Golf Center in 1996, 2000, and 2005.

The listings for 1561 Liberty Street (Parcel 012) are reported as:
• “residential” in 1970, 1975, and 1980.

There were no listings for 1700 Moffat Street (referenced to Parcel 027 by some sources).

There was no other city directory information for the property.

4.7 Historical Sanborn Maps
No historical Sanborn maps for the property were available from EDR.

Report, Phase I ESA 24
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose
5 PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
This section summarizes previous environmental/geotechnical investigations and documents for the property. Portions of selected key documents are included in Appendix D.

5.1 Prior Documents List
A number of environmental site assessment and geotechnical reports have been prepared for the subject property and were provided by the seller. The following reports are discussed in this section:

Geotechnical Engineering Studies
• United Soil Engineering, Inc. (1985), Preliminary Soil and Foundation Investigation and Piezometer Installation for Taylor Street, San Jose, California: for Lincoln Property Company, July 2, 1985.
• Terrasearch, Inc. (1987), Geotechnical Feasibility Evaluation on Proposed Mobile Home Park, St. Claire Corporation Property, APN 15-39-16 and 20, Taylor Street, Alviso, California: for Brandenburg, Staedler and Moore, March 25, 1987. • United Soil Engineering, Inc. (2001), Updated Geotechnical Investigation and Pavement Design, Proposed Development Land of Saint Claire Properties, Southeast Corner of North First Street and Liberty Street, San Jose, California: for Boccardo Management Group, LLC, February 2001.

Environmental Investigations
• E2C (1996), Phase I & II Environmental Site Assessment, Including Asbestos Soil Sampling, Pin High Golf Center, R. V. Storage, Excel Landscape, Turner Construction, & G.T.E. Mobilnet, North First Street & Moffat Street, San Jose, California: for Vasona Properties, October 23, 1996.
• E2C (2004a), Precursor Summary Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, 4701 N. First Street, Alviso, California: for Sainte Claire Corp., April 14, 2004. • E2C (2004b), Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, 4701 N. First Street, San Jose, California: for Sainte Claire Corp., September 20, 2004.

5.2 Geotechnical Engineering Reports

5.2.1 USE (1985): PRELIMINARY SOIL & FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION & PIEZOMETER INSTALLATION This geotechnical investigation was conducted by USE to determine the nature of the surface and subsurface soil at the site. The investigation included 13 exploratory test borings, the collection of soil samples for geotechnical and pollutant analyses, and the installation of two piezometers for groundwater “pollutant testing.” The pollutant testing was reportedly Report, Phase I ESA 25
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose
conducted by Safety Specialists, Inc., and the type of analyses and results are not discussed in this USE report. No 1985 report by Safety Specialists was found in the seller’s files according to Mr. James Rees. Soil boring depths ranged from 17½ feet to 40 feet bgs. USE found that “varying amounts of fill and refuse currently exist on the site. The thickness of this fill material varies throughout the site.” On the western side of Parcel 026, the fill material consisted primarily of “concrete, asphalt, various other construction debris, and some refuse.” The fill thickness ranged from 5 to 12½ feet, and was generally thicker towards the south. USE reported that “at the time of our investigation, various organic debris, concrete blocks, and other refuse were being added to extend the fill area still further.” Groundwater depth varied from 7 to 18 feet bgs among the borings. Piezometer borings were drilled to a depth of 23 feet bgs. One piezometer was located near the center of the eastern half of Parcel 026 and the other was installed near the former meander loop along the southeast side of Parcel 020.

Based on documentation provided by James Rees, in 1989, the company that installed the piezometers, United Soil Engineering (USE), was requested to remove those wells by the owners. However, USE was unable to locate the piezometers in the field and concluded that they had been covered over by soil and lost. We did not find the piezometers during our site visit. There is no regulatory file evidence that the piezometers were properly abandoned / closed under permit.

5.2.2 TERRASEARCH (1987): GEOTECHNICAL FEASIBILITY EVALUATION This geotechnical investigation was performed on former APN 015-39-016 (later re-parceled to 015-39-026 and 027) and Parcel 020. The investigation was for a proposed development described as “a mobile home park placed on 34.5 acres of low-lying land whose elevation will be raised for flood control purposes by placing approximately 7 to 9 feet of engineered fill.” The fieldwork included 7 borings and 11 backhoe test pits to collect soil samples for geotechnical testing. The depth to groundwater reported in the Terrasearch boring logs ranged from 5 to 16 ft bgs. Terrasearch (1987) noted that this site was previously “at or below sea level, and the present topography is the result of a continuing program of land fill.” In addition, “the now infilled dry slough of the Guadalupe River, which transects the subject property from northeast to southwest, will contain an additional depth of fill.”1 The Terrasearch report concluded that “the entire site is covered with uncompacted fill and rubble ranging from 1 to 10 feet in thickness. Approximately 90% of the rubble consists of non-degradable broken concrete slabs.”

1 The fill was reportedly later removed from the slough after the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers determined that the fill had been placed in violation of the Clean Water Act.

Report, Phase I ESA 26
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose

5.2.3 USE (2001): UPDATED GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
At the time of this field investigation, the site was described as “an irregular-shaped, relatively flat parcel of land with scattered drainage channels located around the boundary of the site. An existing golf course and low-lying area occupied the eastern portion of the site. The central portion of the site was occupied by an RV storage yard…The northern section of the property was a vacant parcel of land. Due to the operation of the golf course, during our previous investigation we could not gain access to the golf course and low-lying area adjacent to it.

However, during this updated investigation access to the above-mentioned area was available.” The fieldwork consisted of 7 soil borings to depths ranging from 7 to 35 feet bgs. Groundwater was encountered in three of the borings at a depth of 15-16 feet bgs. USE (2001) noted that there was “a 14 feet thick concrete debris and gravel layer in the southeastern portion of the golf course and the low-lying area.” Figure 2 of the USE report shows that the concrete-laden fill underlies the entire southern half of the golf course and the western half of parcel 020.

5.3 Environmental Investigation Reports

5.3.1 E2C (1996): PHASE I & II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT This assessment was performed for the entire subject site. The Phase I ESA was done in accordance with the old ASTM standard in effect at the time, E1527-94. Land use at the site was the same as current usage, except for a small section of Parcel 026 located on the south side of Moffat Street, at the east end of that street [currently vacant]. Two businesses leased that portion of the parcel: Turner Equipment & Grading (a contractor) and Excel Landscape.

Site History - The report notes that the site was farmland in the past, but “it is our professional judgment that any past usage of herbicides or pesticides on the site does not represent a present environmental impairment.” E2C reported that although soils have been imported or dumped on parts of the site over many years, the imported soils and fill material on the vacant lot (Parcels 012 and 018), RV Storage, and the Pin High Golf Center have been emplaced over approximately the last three years. The imported soils and fill material are a mixture of medium to dark brown sands, silts, and clays with abundant waste materials such as asphalt, glass, and pieces of wood. The parts of the site occupied by Excel and Turner are several feet lower than the other areas, and may have only a thin veneer of fill material. The report notes that Turner and Excel began occupancy between 1982 and 1988, whereas the RV Storage and Pin High Golf Center portions of the site were developed in the early 1990s. E2C states there were no records of any USTs ever being on the site.

Site Inspection – During their site inspection, E2C observed “numerous mounds of temporarilystored soils” on Parcels 012 and 018. Excel occupied 0.2 acres and was observed to comprise a small office and storage shed at the front, two house trailers, three vehicles, a tractor, a truck trailer and a storage shed at the rear, and miscellaneous stored materials. Excel also had a 55- Report, Phase I ESA 27
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose
gallon drum, several partially full 5-gallon containers of used oil and coolant, and vehicle batteries stored on a wooden pallet. Turner occupied 0.38 acres and was observed to have six house trailers, seven vehicles, two boats, a generator, five sheds, and miscellaneous stored or junked materials. The premises were relatively clean, but the ground surface was stained with petroleum products in several areas. E2C attributed the staining to leakage from vehicles. The maintenance area at Pin High was noted to have an aboveground 500-gallon gasoline tank. The maintenance shed at Pin High had a 2-gallon container of gasoline, cans of paint, and small containers of other miscellaneous substances, including small quantities of pesticides stored in a chest. E2C reported that all areas at Pin High were very clean and well maintained.

Asbestos Testing – E2C noted that some areas of Alviso were used as dumping grounds for asbestos wastes for over 30 years, and the subject site was within the bounds of the South Bay Asbestos Area, a Superfund site (see Section 5.4.2 below). Based on that, soil sampling was conducted at 15 locations to evaluate for asbestos in the onsite fill. Sampling locations were not identified, but did not include the Turner and Excel premises. Sampling included the collection of 28 soil samples at various depths between 2 and 12 feet bgs. The laboratory analyses did not detect the presence of asbestos in any of the samples. According to Mr. James Rees, the property is not part of the South Bay Asbestos Area.

E2C concluded that “based on our site inspection and review of available past and present information on the subject site,… there has been no apparent adverse environmental impact from past or present on-site land use.” With respect to neighboring facilities, “there is no evidence to suggest that past or present activities on those properties has had an adverse environmental impact on the subject site.”

5.3.2 E2C (2004): PRECURSOR SUMMARY PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT This study included Parcels 026, 027, and an adjacent property located on the south side of Moffat Street at Liberty Street. The environmental assessment was mainly comprised of a site inspection for each leasee along with photographs. Observations reported by E2C for the subject property are as follows:

Turner Equipment & Grading (Turner) – Turner’s operation was observed “as noncompliant with state and federal automotive repair standards.” A lift was present near the rear of the premises with extensive oil staining on the hard-pack fill ground. Behind a removable shed, there was a waste oil basin with secondary containment, but the ground around it was heavily stained. E2C recommended “the collection of soil samples in areas where chemical storage and automotive repair exists.”
Pin High Golf Center – The maintenance area had “a noncompliant 55-gallon diesel tank” with the absence of secondary containment, and mounted on a steel frame inadequate for the load Report, Phase I ESA 28
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose
imposed by the tank.2 E2C states that Pin High has no record of permits, or a hazardous materials business plan as required by California regulations. E2C recommended that Pin High get into compliance and also “soil sampling to eliminate the possibility of contamination.” Verizon Wireless – The cell tower facility was noted to have a “150-gallon aboveground diesel tank, and battery acid” associated with an emergency generator. No Phase II sampling was recommended.

RV Storage – There were no concerns identified.

Excel Landscape – E2C recommended better management of “unlabeled waste drums”. The drum contents were not specified.

5.3.3 E2C (2004): PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT This Phase II investigation was conducted as a follow-up to the Precursor Phase I Assessment (E2C, 2004a) to evaluate for potential contamination at the Pin High Maintenance Area, Turner Equipment & Grading, and the vacant Parcels 012 and 018. E2C’s investigation included a second phase of “step out” soil sampling after chemicals of concern (COC) were identified during the first phase. Depending on the location, soil samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), total oil and grease (TOG), metals, pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). A grab groundwater sample was collected from each of the three target areas and over 80 soil samples were analyzed by E2C.

Overview of Results - Based on our review of the laboratory reports in E2C’s Appendix A, the E2C summary data tables omitted many of the test results. The soil analytical data indicated the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel, motor oil, or total oil & grease (TPH-d, TPH-mo, TOG) at certain locations in all three target areas; heavy metals such as arsenic, selenium, thallium, and mercury were noted at Turner Equipment and the vacant parcels; and traces of some pesticides and PCBs were noted within the vacant parcels. VOCs were not detected in any samples. The laboratory analyses did not detect chemicals of concern in the three grab groundwater samples.

Discussion of Results – TPH-d was detected in 18 soil samples from the Pin High Maintenance Area at concentrations ranging from 1.7 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) to 716 mg/kg. The latter sample also had a TPH-mo concentration of 1,250 mg/kg. TPH-d was detected in seven soil samples from Turner Equipment at concentrations in the range of 10-115 mg/kg. TOG was also detected in two samples from Turner Equipment at concentrations of 110 mg/kg and 4,700 mg/kg. Numerous samples from the vacant parcels contained TPH-d (0.6-985 mg/kg) and TPHmo (1-1,748 mg/kg).

2 This is the same AST described as a “500-gallon gasoline tank” in E2C (1996).

Report, Phase I ESA 29
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose
Arsenic was detected in numerous samples from Turner Equipment at concentrations in the range of 6.7-33 mg/kg. Arsenic was detected in numerous samples from the vacant parcels in the range of 6.8-155 mg/kg, with most samples reporting less than 20 mg/kg. Background concentrations for arsenic usually range up to about 15 mg/kg. Selenium was detected in three samples from Turner Equipment at concentrations in the range of 7.9-11 mg/kg. Selenium was detected in five samples from the vacant parcels at concentrations in the range of 8.5-13 mg/kg.

Thallium was detected in one sample from Turner Equipment at a concentration of 11.3 mg/kg.

Thallium was detected in six samples from the vacant parcels in the range of 5.2-17 mg/kg.

Mercury was detected in eight samples from Turner Equipment at concentrations of 0.074-4 mg/kg. Mercury was detected in numerous samples from the vacant parcels at concentrations in the range of 0.055-18 mg/kg, with all but two samples less than 10 mg/kg.

Because the RWQCB’s Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs) for shallow soil at commercial/industrial sites was exceeded by various constituents at all three target areas, E2C recommended that remediation be conducted. E2C outlined three areas on their Figures 3, 4, and 5 where soils should be excavated and removed for proper disposal (see Appendix D).

Based on GEOLOGICA’S recent discussion with the property owner, James Rees, remediation was never conducted. Mr. Rees indicated that it was expected that remediation would be conducted at the time of redevelopment.

5.4 Off-Site Properties
There are two off-site properties/areas of significant environmental concern that warrant discussion: 1) the Cisco Site 6/Syntax Court Disposal Site and 2) the South Bay Asbestos Area Superfund site. The following is a brief summary about these two properties and the associated environmental issues.

5.4.1 CISCO SITE 6/SYNTAX COURT DISPOSAL SITE
Site Setting and History - The Cisco Site 6 site (also known as the Syntax Court Disposal Site) is present to the southeast adjacent to the intersection of Highway 237 and North First Street.

The site itself is not immediately adjacent to the subject property, but rather is separated by the adjacent undeveloped parcel to the southeast of the subject property as shown on Figure 2, and in selected figures from GEOLOGICA (2015) included in Appendix C. The acreage surrounding and southeast of the City of Santa Clara sewer pump station has a Deed Restriction administered by DTSC because of shallow lead-containing fill soils. The acreage contiguous with the subject property at Parcels 020 and 026 is not deed restricted. The entire acreage south of the subject property was also subject to fill placement over the years, but some amount of more formal landfill of waste refuse occurred in the southeast portion of the property near Highway 237. The waste refuse landfilling operations are believed to have occurred in the late 1950s and 1960s, and consisted mainly of domestic-type trash buried beneath at least 2 feet of soil containing abundant concrete and asphalt rubble. The deed restricted portion of the property is listed in the Report, Phase I ESA 30
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose
CalRecycle SWIS database as an unpermitted former landfill site subject to CCR Title 27 regulation by CalRecycle and the City of San Jose. The landfill site is in the process of being closed under Title 27.

Shallow Groundwater Impacts - Shallow groundwater at the Cisco Site 6/Syntax Ct Disposal Site has been impacted by chlorinated VOCs which are believed to be sourced from the waste refuse layer in a localized area south of the former Syntax Ct, near the intersection of North First Street and Highway 237. A program of in-situ groundwater remediation by injection has recently been undertaken under the oversight of the RWQCB; this program is expected to address impacts near the source area resulting in down-gradient reductions in VOC concentrations over time. As shown on the figures in Appendix C, the leading edge of a shallow groundwater VOC plume appears to extend onto the eastern edge of Parcel 020 of the subject property.

Current Regulatory and Development Status - The Cisco Site 6/Syntax Court Disposal Site property owners are currently working with the RWQCB, DTSC, CalRecycle, and the City of San Jose Local Enforcement Agency (LEA) to comply with Title 27 and the DTSC/RWQCB environmental requirements. Concurrently, the site is under development as an office park and hotel property. This development plan includes the vacant property along the east side of Parcel 026, which is not included in the DTSC deed restriction. Under separate ownership, 3.5 acres in the southeastern corner of Cisco Site 6 is being redeveloped with a hotel. Title 27 has many specifications that must be followed for development of a landfill site.

5.4.2 SOUTH BAY ASBESTOS AREA
The South Bay Asbestos Area (SBAA) was placed on the National Priorities List (NPL or Superfund) in 1984, and it is also in the CERCLIS database. The map in the EDR Raduis Report in Appendix B indicates that Parcels 012, 018, and the western part of 026 fall within the bounds of the SBAA. However, that is not the case. The nearby former landfills included in the SBAA are shown on Figure 2.

History - The SBAA has been the subject of extensive investigations by EPA. Reportedly, prior to the 1980s, portions of the Alviso area were used as dumping grounds to combat ground subsidence and reduce flood hazards. During the 1950s, several landfills in the Alviso area accepted wastes from an asbestos cement pipe manufacturing facility. Contaminated fill was also used for raising the grade of the area and for constructing a ring-levee, which resulted in asbestos contamination being spread throughout the Alviso area by windblown dust and truck traffic on unpaved lots. The main concern within the SBAA was exposure to asbestos fibers that became airborne in dust.

Regulatory Status - According to EPA’s recent Five-Year Review (2015), the SBAA formerly consisted of two Operable Units (OUs): a Ring Levee (OU-1) constructed by the City of San Report, Phase I ESA 31
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose
Jose, and the Overall Site (OU-2). An excerpt from the EPA Five-Year Review (2015) is included in Appendix C. OU-1 has been remediated by the total removal of the asbestoscontaining Ring Levee, which was completed in 1994. The Ring Levee was located to the north of the subject property. OU-2 consists of three landfills and four truck yards. The landfills (Santos, Marshland, and Sainte Claire landfills) contained asbestos waste from an asbestos cement pipe manufacturing plant. The Santos landfill site has been redeveloped into two separately-owned parcels that include the Summerset Mobile Home Estates and the Bixby Technology Center (also known as Gold Street Tech Center). The Marshland Landfill (also known as the Hwy 237 landfill) is now the site of the America Center. The Santos and Marshland landfills are located southwest of the subject property on the opposite side of the Guadalupe River. The Sainte Claire landfill was determined in 2011 not to contain asbestos wastes above the action level. By November 2004, owners of all four truck yards in OU-2 had elected to excavate and dispose of the contaminated soil off-site, thus removing potential exposure from those properties. Based on confirmation soil sampling, EPA concluded that the asbestos contamination was effectively removed from the truck yard properties and no further action was required. The truck yards were located adjacent to the Ring Levee, north of the subject property. In August 2007, EPA conducted additional activity-based sampling for asbestos in the Alviso community. EPA concluded that asbestos exposures from typical dust generating activities (including vehicular traffic on the streets) were below risk-based levels of concern. To ensure maintenance of remediation measures at the former landfills of OU-2, EPA has required Deed Restrictions and Land Use Covenants (except at Sainte Claire), and the development of Soil Management Plans. EPA (2015) believes that the risk of exposure to asbestos has been lowered to acceptable levels within the SBAA. The representative of the ownership, James Rees, stated that it has been determined that the subject property is not within the bounds of the South Bay Asbestos Area.

Report, Phase I ESA 32
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose
6 AGENCY RECORDS AND DATABASES
GEOLOGICA made requests to local and State environmental agencies to inquire about relevant records for the subject site. Copies of pertinent agency records are included in Appendix C.

6.1 Governmental Agency Records
The following sections summarize the results of our agency research and inquiries.

6.1.1 SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT (SCVWD)
The SCVWD website for Local Oversight Program (LOP) Public Records was searched. No files or records were available for the subject property.

6.1.2 SANTA CLARA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH (SCCDEH) We submitted a written request to SCCDEH for a records search. The SCCDEH responded that the only records they had for the property were the 2011 and 2012 HazMat Business Plans (HMBP) for the Verizon cell tower facility. A copy of the 2012 HMBP is included in Appendix C. There is apparently no HMBP on file for Pin High. We also researched the LOP website database hosted by SCCDEH, but found no records for the subject site. As noted elsewhere in this report, no HazMat Business Plan appears to have ever been in place for the Pin High Maintenance Area and associated fuel storage.

6.1.3 CITY OF SAN JOSE (SJ)
The SJ files were viewed through the City’s online permits website. The records in the SJ online database included the original building permits for Pin High issued in 1993 and 1994, and subsequent permits for miscellaneous alterations. There were also numerous permits issued to Verizon for the cellular communications facility, including the installation of a new emergency generator in 2011. There were no permit records older that 1993.

6.1.4 BAY AREA AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (AQMD)
GEOLOGICA submitted a records request for the site to the AQMD. The AQMD responded that they had no records for the subject property other than a permit issued to Verizon for a standby emergency generator.

6.1.5 SAN FRANCISCO REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD (RWQCB) We submitted a written request to the RWQCB for a records search for the subject site. The RWQCB reported that they had no information about the property. We also searched the Geotracker website, but found no records for the subject property. A Geotracker link is reportedly in the process of being set up for the Syntax Court Disposal site. Various documents are in the public record for that site.

Report, Phase I ESA 33
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose

6.1.6 CALRECYCLE
GEOLOGICA submitted a written request to CalRecycle for any relevant records about the subject site. CalRecycle reported that they had no information concerning the property. We also reviewed CalRecycle’s online Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) database, but found no records for the property.

SWIS indicated that there is a closed landfill site (Sainte Claire Landfill) located one block west of the subject property, on the south side of Moffat Street at Gold Street. The location of the landfill is shown on Figure 2. Asbestos sampling results from the Sainte Claire Landfill demonstrated to the EPA and DTSC in 2011 that the site did not contain asbestos contamination above the Action Level, and no deed restriction was required for that site. The most recent City of San Jose Inspection Report for that landfill indicated no problems were found (Appendix C).

6.1.7 CALIFORNIA EPA, DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL (DTSC) The DTSC responded to our written records request that they had no files for the subject property. GEOLOGICA also searched DTSC’s online Envirostor database, but found no records concerning the site. An Envirostor listing does exist for the Cisco 6 site.

6.2 EDR Report
EDR prepared a regulatory database research report for this ESA entitled The EDR Radius Map Report with GeoCheck, dated October 14, 2015. The EDR report summarizes the results of a search of federal, state, and local agency environmental databases to identify hazardous waste generators, corrective action sites, landfills, UST facilities, and sites currently or previously under investigation for environmental violations. The search included the subject property and the surrounding area. The search radius for the report ranges from adjacent sites out to one mile from the property, as prescribed by the ASTM Standard, depending on the type of facility database being searched. The EDR report is presented in Appendix B. The following sections summarize pertinent findings from the EDR report.

6.2.1 DATABASE SUMMARY – SUBJECT PROPERTY
EDR reports that the only reference for the subject property is a Santa Clara County CUPA listing for Verizon because a HMBP has been submitted for their emergency generator.

6.2.2 DATABASE SUMMARY – SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
The EDR report indicated numerous listings within the search radius from among the agency databases and EDR’s proprietary databases. A number of the databases are duplicative and/or are no longer updated by the originating agency. Many of the facilities cited in the EDR report are listed on multiple databases. Therefore, the actual number of relevant facilities within the ASTM search area is lower than indicated.

Report, Phase I ESA 34
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose
The following list is a summary of the EDR findings for significant databases within specified radii together with a discussion for selected sites, if any, that are proximal and generally upgradient (south) of the subject property. The sites that are downgradient are unlikely to have impacted soil and groundwater at the subject property unless they are adjacent or are very proximal.

NPL – There is 1 site on this list within 1 mile of the subject property. • The South Bay Asbestos Area was discussed above in Section 5.4.2.

CERCLIS – There is 1 site (SBAA) on this list within 0.5 miles of the subject property.

RCRA-CORRACTS – There are 0 sites on the list within 1 mile of the subject property.

Envirostor – There are 17 sites on the list within 1 mile of the subject property. • The most important Envirostor-listed property is Cisco Site 6, which was discussed above in Section 5.4.1.
• Another nearby Envirostor facility is Alviso Independent Oil Company at 1110 Taylor Street, about 365 feet west-northwest (downgradient) of the subject site. The status of this facility as of June 2009 is “Inactive -- Needs Evaluation.” This facility is apparently closed and does not appear to be a concern for the subject site.

LUST – There are 10 sites on the list within 0.5 miles of the subject property. However, only three of the LUST sites are within 500 feet of the subject property, and none of the three are upgradient.
• The nearest LUST case is listed simply as a Private Residence (no address) in the EDR report. However, records in Geotracker indicate that the address for this site is 1110 Taylor Street, the same as the Envirostor listing for Alviso Oil Company. This is downgradient from the subject property. This LUST case is due to a release from a gasoline UST that reportedly had not been used since 1940. Contamination was minimal and the case was closed in 1995. This site does not pose a concern for the subject property.
• Another nearby LUST site is a San Jose Fire Station at 1590 Gold Street, about 390 feet west-northwest (downgradient) of the subject site. This case involved a release of gasoline discovered in 1984. The leaky UST was removed in 1987. The case was closed in 2002 after it was determined that residual contamination was limited to the immediate vicinity of the former UST. This site does not pose a concern for the subject property.
• The last LUST case within 500 feet is WSP Trucking at 1200 State Street, about 470 feet northwest of the subject site. This case involved a release of diesel fuel discovered in 1992. The case was closed in 1995 and does not pose a concern for the subject property.

SLIC – There is 3 sites on this list within 0.5 miles of the subject property. However, only one of the SLIC sites is within 1,000 feet of the subject property.

Report, Phase I ESA 35
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose
• Referred to as Moneymaker & Hoxie, with a vague location given by EDR as “cross Route 237 assemblage & Gold Street.” This would appear to be well over 500 feet southwest of the subject site, on the opposite side of the Guadalupe River. This SLIC site is not considered a threat to the subject property.

EDR Historical Auto Stations – There are 2 sites on the list within 0.25 miles of the subject property.
• The only information provided about these facilities are name, address, and year listed.

The paucity of information does not allow an objective conclusion to be drawn.

EDR Historical Cleaners – There are 0 sites on the list within 0.25 miles of the subject property.

The EDR report contains a list of Orphan Sites that have incomplete address information and could not be plotted on the map. A review of the 5 Orphan Sites in the EDR report did not reveal specific concerns for the subject property.

Report, Phase I ESA 36
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose
7 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The following sections detail Recognized Environmental Conditions and recommendations associated with this Phase I ESA. Noteworthy environmental compliance issues are also presented.

7.1 Data Gaps
The fill placed on the subject site in the 1980s and earlier is undocumented and from an unknown source(s). “Pollutant testing” was reportedly conducted on soil and groundwater samples from the site in 1987, but the results of that work are apparently not available. The sampling locations from E2C’s Phase II (2004b) 11 years ago are only roughly known based on sketch figures in their report, so remedial excavation of specific areas would entail significant uncertainty. No other significant data gaps, as defined in ASTM E 1527-13, have been identified in completing this Phase I ESA.

7.2 Recognized Environmental Conditions
GEOLOGICA has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the ASTM Standard E 1527-13 for APNs 015-39-020, -026, -027 and 015-03-012 and -018 in San Jose, California. Any exceptions to, or deletions from these practices were described in this report where applicable. Based on the scope of services and limitations of this Phase I ESA, Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) were identified in connection with the subject property. The following RECs are associated with the subject site:
• Undocumented Fill and Debris – Undocumented fill containing concrete debris and other material reportedly underlies most or all of the property. Significant accumulations of concrete debris were noted in the southeastern portion of the Pin High facility.
• Soil – Soil samples from specific areas of the property were tested by E2C (2004); evidence of TPH and metals contamination in exceedance of RWQCB Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs) was reported. Recommendations for remediation were made by E2C, but apparently were not implemented. Oil stains on the ground and pavement at the Pin High maintenance yard and RV storage yard were observed during a site visit for the current study.
• Groundwater – Off-site shallow groundwater at the Cisco Site 6/Syntax Ct Disposal Site to the southeast has been impacted by chlorinated VOCs. These are believed to be sourced from a localized area near the intersection of North First Street and Highway 237. A program of in-situ groundwater remediation by injection has recently been undertaken by the owners of that property under the oversight of the RWQCB. The leading edge of the shallow groundwater VOC plume appears to extend onto the eastern edge of Parcel 020 of the subject property.

Report, Phase I ESA 37
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose
In addition to the above noted RECs, several environmental compliance issues were noted:
• No HazMat Business Plan appears to have ever been in place with the City of San Jose or the County of Santa Clara for the Pin High Maintenance Area and associated fuel storage. In addition, housekeeping practices in the Pin High maintenance yard included storage of petroleum hydrocarbons and herbicide containers on bare soil without secondary containment to prevent incidental spillage of petroleum hydrocarbons or other chemicals (e.g., weed killer).
• An out-of-service irrigation well is located at the far eastern corner of the Pin High acreage, adjacent to North First Street. The well is reportedly about 150 feet deep and was installed shortly after Pin High was constructed (1993). No other information was available regarding well construction. The well was reportedly taken out of service 10 - 15 years ago when the City of San Jose installed piping to supply Pin High with reclaimed municipal water for irrigation purposes. The well was not identified on a database list of registered water supply wells in the area, suggesting that the well is not registered with the State of California Department of Water Resources (DWR). The well is currently not plumbed for on-site irrigation water supply. DWR regulations require that wells out of service for more than one year be closed. • Two groundwater piezometers were installed by USE (1985). In 1989, an attempt was made by USE at the owner’s request to find the piezometers so that they could be properly closed. Apparently, E2C was unable to locate the peizometers, which had apparently been buried. Thus, the two piezometers at the site were never properly abandoned or closed under county permit. They may be uncovered during future grading operations.

7.3 Recommendations
We recommend a Phase II investigation to evaluate potential contamination in soil and groundwater at the site and to assess whether undocumented fill and / or groundwater may require special handling for off-site disposal if future construction / grading generates excess soil or water.

GEOLOGICA recommends the following Phase II work:
• Exploratory Soil Sampling – Soil samples should be collected to evaluate for petroleum hydrocarbons and metals contamination, and other constituents when indicated. Sampling should include areas formerly identified for remediation by E2C (2004), and also selected areas across the entire site to assess the undocumented fill and provide a baseline prior to redevelopment of the property.

Report, Phase I ESA 38
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose
• Groundwater Sampling – Grab groundwater samples should be collected in selected areas of the property to evaluate for petroleum hydrocarbons, VOCs, pesticides, and metals contamination and to provide a baseline prior to redevelopment of the property.

Report, Phase I ESA 39
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose
8 LIMITATIONS
This report has been prepared solely for Terra Hospitality in accordance with GEOLOGICA’s proposal. Other parties may rely on the findings and conclusions of the report for informational purposes only. However, Terra Hospitality and other parties who may rely on the findings and conclusions of the report should recognize that this report is not a comprehensive site characterization and should not be construed as such. The findings and conclusions in this report are predicated on a site reconnaissance, a review of specified records, and a review of the historical usage of the property as presented in this report.

The information obtained is only relevant for the dates of the records reviewed or as of the date of the latest site visit. Thus, the information contained herein is only valid as of the date of the report, and should be updated in the future to reflect any changes in circumstances. The report should only be deemed conclusive with respect to the information obtained. No guarantee of the results of the study is made within the intent of this report or any subsequent report, correspondence or consultation, either express or implied. The services performed were conducted in accordance with the local standard of care in the geographic region at the time the services were rendered.

Report, Phase I ESA 40
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose
9 REFERENCES
• ASTM Designation E1527-13, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments:

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process: American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), West Conshohocken, PA.
• Brown and Caldwell, September 2006, South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project, Appendix L: Groundwater Analysis Report for South Bay Salt Pond EIS/R. • California Dept. of Water Resources, 2004, Santa Clara Valley Groundwater Basin:

Bull. 118, California’s Groundwater.
• E2C, April 14, 2004, Precursor Summary Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, 4701 N. First Street, Alviso, California: for Sainte Claire Corp. • E2C, September 20, 2004, Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, 4701 N. First Street, San Jose, California: for Sainte Claire Corp.
• EDR Inc., October 14, 2015, The EDR Radius Map Report with GeoCheck: Inquiry Number 4437954.2s.
• EDR Inc., October 19, 2015, City Directory Abstract: Inquiry Number 4437954.6. • EDR Inc., October 19, 2015, Aerial Photo Decade Package: Inquiry Number 4437954.5. • EDR Inc., October 14, 2015, Historical Topographic Map Report: Inquiry Number 4437954.4.
• EDR Inc., October 14, 2015, Certified Sanborn Map Report: Inquiry Number 4437954.3. • GEOLOGICA, May 1, 2015, Work Plan for Remediation and Monitoring of VOCs in Groundwater & Soil Vapor, 237 @ First Street Development Project, San Jose, California: for 237 North First Street Investors, LLC.
• Helley, E.J. et al, 1994, Quaternary Geology of Santa Clara Valley, Santa Clara, Alameda, and San Mateo Counties, California: A digital database: U.S. Geological Survey, Open-File Report 94-231.
• Terrasearch, Inc., March 25, 1987, Geotechnical Feasibility Evaluation on Proposed Mobile Home Park, St. Claire Corporation Property, Taylor Street, Alviso, California:
for Brandenburg, Staedler and Moore.
• United Soil Engineering, July 1985, Preliminary Soil and Foundation Investigation and Piezometer Installation for Taylor Street, San Jose, California: for Lincoln Property Company.
• United Soil Engineering, February 7, 2001, Updated Geotechnical Investigation and Pavement Design, Proposed Development Land of Saint Claire Properties, Southeast Corner of North First Street and Liberty Street, San Jose, California: for Boccardo Management Group.

Report, Phase I ESA 41
Pin High Golf Center & Adjacent Parcels, San Jose
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), September 10, 2015, Five-Year Review Report for South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site.
• U.S. Geological Survey, 1980, Milpitas, California 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle map.
• Wentworth, C.M., et al, 1999, Preliminary Geologic Map of the San Jose 30 x 60 Minute Quadrangle, California: U.S. Geological Survey, Open-File Report 98-795.

Figures
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment geologica
Pin High Golf Center, 4701 N. 1st Street, San Jose

SITE LOCATION MAP
Pin High $FUHDJH
San Jose, CA 95002
FIGURE 1

SITE VICINITY MAP
Pin High Acreage
San Jose, CA 95002
FIGURE 2
Residential
Residential
Retail
Community
Center
Residential
Former
Sainte Claire
Landfill
Residential &
Storage Yards
Former
Santos
Landfill
Guadalupe River
Tri-Valley
Excavating
Former
Marshland
Landfill
Library Youth
Center School
(Acreage Under
Development)
(Acreage Under Development)
Cisco Site 6/
Syntax Ct. Disposal Site
Vacant
Acreage
IBM
Harmonic
Vacant
Acreage
Pin High
Golf Center
RV Lot
Former
Excel Landscape
& Turner Equipment
Verizon
015-39-027
City of
Santa Clara
Sewer Pump
Station
fence
River
Meander
Loop
015-39-020
015-03-012
015-03-018
APN 015-39-020
APN 015-39-026
APN 015-39-027
APN 015-03-012
APN 015-03-018

10.81 acres

25.36 acres
~0.10 acres

1.376 acres

0.619 acres
015-39-026
“Lowland
Area”
Appendix A
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment geologica
Pin High Golf Center, 4701 N. 1st Street, San Jose
Site Photographs

PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
October 13 & 23, 2015
Client Name:

Terra Hospitality
Site Location:
4701 N. First Street, San Jose, CA
Project No.

Photo No. 1
View Direction of
Photo:

South
Description:

The front entrance
and parking lot at Pin
High Golf Center.

The clubhouse is in
the background, left
of the driveway,
behind trees.

Photo No. 2
View Direction of
Photo:

North
Description:

Another view of the
Pin High parking lot.

Houses are in the
background on the
north side of First
Street.

PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
October 13 & 23, 2015
Client Name:

Terra Hospitality
Site Location:
4701 N. First Street, San Jose, CA
Project No.

Photo No. 3
View Direction of
Photo:

South
Description:

Practice putting
green with the
clubhouse in the
background. An
outdoor patio is
located on this side of
the clubhouse.

Photo No. 4
View Direction of
Photo:

North
Description:

The interior of the Pin
High clubhouse.

PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
October 13 & 23, 2015
Client Name:

Terra Hospitality
Site Location:
4701 N. First Street, San Jose, CA
Project No.

Photo No. 5
View Direction of
Photo:

North
Description:

The west end of the
driving range. The
clubhouse is in the
background, left of
center.

Photo No. 6
View Direction of
Photo:

Southeast
Description:

Looking down the Pin
High driving range.

In the background is
the steel
superstructure of an
office building under
construction on the
adjacent Cisco Site 6
property.

PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
October 13 & 23, 2015
Client Name:

Terra Hospitality
Site Location:
4701 N. First Street, San Jose, CA
Project No.

Photo No. 7
View Direction of
Photo:

West
Description:

An equipment wash
pad located between
the clubhouse and
the maintenance
yard. Note the stack
of railroad ties at
right. The vehicles in
the background are
on the adjacent TriValley Excavation lot.

Photo No. 8
View Direction of
Photo:

North
Description:

The Pin High
maintenance yard.

An out-of-service
diesel AST is at left, a
walk-in storage locker
is right of the AST,
and the western
canopy structure is
right of the locker.

The Verizon
blockhouse and cell
tower are in the
background.

PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
October 13 & 23, 2015
Client Name:

Terra Hospitality
Site Location:
4701 N. First Street, San Jose, CA
Project No.

Photo No. 9
View Direction of
Photo:

West
Description:

Faded blue drums of
diesel fuel under the
western canopy
structure.

Photo No. 10
View Direction of
Photo:

West
Description:

Hazardous waste
storage area under
the western canopy
structure.

PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
October 13 & 23, 2015
Client Name:

Terra Hospitality
Site Location:
4701 N. First Street, San Jose, CA
Project No.

Photo No. 11
View Direction of
Photo:

North
Description:

The eastern canopy
structure in the Pin
High maintenance
yard. Note the dark
oil stains on the
ground.

Photo No. 12
View Direction of
Photo:

South
Description:

Verizon’s standby
emergency generator
sits to the right of the
blockhouse within the
cell tower facility.

PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
October 13 & 23, 2015
Client Name:

Terra Hospitality
Site Location:
4701 N. First Street, San Jose, CA
Project No.

Photo No. 13
View Direction of
Photo:

North
Description:

The wellhead of the
out-of-service Pin
High irrigation well.

The pipe connects to
a steel AST off the
left edge of the photo.

Photo No. 14
View Direction of
Photo:

West
Description:

The vacant section of
3arcel 026 formerly
occupied by Turner
Equipment and Excel
Landscape.

PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
October 13 & 23, 2015
Client Name:

Terra Hospitality
Site Location:
4701 N. First Street, San Jose, CA
Project No.

Photo No. 15
View Direction of
Photo:

South
Description:

Another view of the
vacant section of
3arcel 026 formerly
occupied by Turner
Equipment and Excel
Landscape. A
vehicle fuel tank is in
the foreground in the
middle of Moffat
Street.

Photo No. 16
View Direction of
Photo:

Northwest
Description:

Looking across the
western portion of the
wetland area in
3arcel 020. The
fence of the Pin High
driving range is in the
background. The
paved Guadalupe
River bike trail is at
the left edge of the
photo.

PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
October 13 & 23, 2015
Client Name:

Terra Hospitality
Site Location:
4701 N. First Street, San Jose, CA
Project No.

Photo No. 17
View Direction of
Photo:

Northeast
Description:

Another view of the
wetland section of
3arcel 020 showing
the remnant meander
loop at the southeast
edge of the parcel.

Photo No. 18
View Direction of
Photo:

Southwest
Description:

A close-up view of
the former meander
loop from the north
end of that feature.

PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
October 13 & 23, 2015
Client Name:

Terra Hospitality
Site Location:
4701 N. First Street, San Jose, CA
Project No.

Photo No. 19
View Direction of
Photo:

East
Description:

View across the RV
storage lot from the
west end of the lot.

The RVs at right are
parked along Moffat
Street outside the
yard fence.

Photo No. 20
View Direction of
Photo:

North
Description:

The mid-section of
the RV storage lot
showing the highvoltage power lines
that cross through the
property. Note the oil
stains at the left
edge.

PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
October 13 & 23, 2015
Client Name:

Terra Hospitality
Site Location:
4701 N. First Street, San Jose, CA
Project No.

Photo No. 21
View Direction of
Photo:

North
Description:

The eastern portion
of the RV storage lot.

Photo No. 22
View Direction of
Photo:

Southeast
Description:

Miscellaneous
containers of waste
oil and other
hazardous waste
encountered during
the cleanup of the RV
storage yard. The
contents of the blue
drum are unknown.

PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
October 13 & 23, 2015
Client Name:

Terra Hospitality
Site Location:
4701 N. First Street, San Jose, CA
Project No.

Photo No. 23
View Direction of
Photo:

Northwest
Description:

Oil-stained pavement
in the northwest
corner of the RV
storage lot. The
asphalt pavement
has a thin coating of
sandy pea gravel.

Photo No. 24
View Direction of
Photo:

North
Description:

View across vacant
3arcel 018 from the
south property line.

PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
October 13 & 23, 2015
Client Name:

Terra Hospitality
Site Location:
4701 N. First Street, San Jose, CA
Project No.

Photo No. 25
View Direction of
Photo:

Northeast
Description:

View of 3arcel 018
from the intersection
of Moffat and Liberty
Streets.

Photo No. 26
View Direction of
Photo:

South
Description:

View across 3arcels
012 and 018 from the
north end of 3arcel
012. The fence of
the RV storage lot is
at the left edge of the
photo.

Appendix B
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment geologica
Pin High Golf Center, 4701 N. 1st Street, San Jose
EDR Reports

FORM-LBC-LMI
®kcehCoeG htiw tropeR ™paM suidaR RDE ehT
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
Pin High Golf Center
4701 N. First Street
San Jose, CA 95002
Inquiry Number: 4437954.2s
October 14, 2015

SECTION PAGE
Executive Summary ES1
Overview Map 2
Detail Map 3
Map Findings Summary 4
Map Findings 8
Orphan Summary 226
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1

GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary A-2
Physical Setting Source Map A-7
Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-8
Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1
TC4437954.2s Page 1
Thank you for your business.

Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.

Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,

ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.

Copyright 2015 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.

EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC4437954.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).

The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.

TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION

ADDRESS
4701 N. FIRST STREET
SAN JOSE, CA 95002

COORDINATES
Latitude (North): 37.4235000 - 37˚ 25’ 24.60’’
Longitude (West): 121.9701000 - 121˚ 58’ 12.36’’
Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 10
UTM X (Meters): 591129.2
UTM Y (Meters): 4142147.8
Elevation: 6 ft. above sea level

USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map: 5640070 MILPITAS, CA
Version Date: 2012

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
Portions of Photo from: 20120520
Source: USDA
4437954.2s Page 2
J38 ALL PURPOSE LANDFILL 5500 LAFAYETTE ST LUST, HIST LUST, SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST Higher 2246, 0.425, South J37 ALL PURPOSE LANDFILL 5500 LAFAYETTE STREE WMUDS/SWAT, LDS, WDS Higher 2246, 0.425, South J36 SANTA CLARA GATEWAY YERBA BUENA & LAFAYE ENVIROSTOR, VCP, DEED Higher 2194, 0.416, SSW I35 REBAR SPACER BLOCK C 1400 STATE ST LUST, HIST LUST, SWEEPS UST, CUPA Listings, SAN... Lower 1828, 0.346, North I34 REBAR SPACER BLOCK C 1400 STATE HIST CORTESE Lower 1804, 0.342, North 33 SAN JOSE CITY OF PUM 3519 GOLD LUST, CUPA Listings, HIST CORTESE, SAN JOSE HAZMAT Higher 1697, 0.321, SSW H32 FORMER BAYSIDE CANNE 1290 HOPE STREET SLIC, BROWNFIELDS Higher 1295, 0.245, WNW G31 ALVISO INDEPENDENT O 5002 ARCHER ST HWP, NPDES, WDS Lower 1246, 0.236, NNW H30 ACME BUILDING MAINTE 941 CATHERINE ST LUST, HIST LUST, SWEEPS UST Higher 1120, 0.212, WNW H29 ACME BUILDING MAINTE 941 CATHERINE ST. HIST UST, HIST CORTESE Higher 1120, 0.212, WNW G28 1341 ARCHER EDR US Hist Auto Stat Lower 1057, 0.200, NNW G27 INDIGO POOL SERVICE 1341 ARCHER ST SUITE SAN JOSE HAZMAT Lower 1057, 0.200, NNW G26 INDIGO POOLS INC 1341 ARCHER ST STOR CUPA Listings Lower 1057, 0.200, NNW G25 VOYAGER MARINE 1296 STATE STREET SLIC Lower 1056, 0.200, NNW 24 SYNTAX COURT D.S. SYNTAX CT, N 1ST ST. SWF/LF Higher 893, 0.169, ESE F23 OAKCREST ESTATES MHC 4271 N 1ST ST CUPA Listings, SAN JOSE HAZMAT Higher 891, 0.169, SSE F22 4271 N 1ST ST EDR US Hist Auto Stat Higher 891, 0.169, SSE 21 ALVISO PUMP STATION 3519 GOLD STREET HIST UST Lower 878, 0.166, NW 20 CISCO SYSTEMS SITE 6 NORTH FIRST STREET A ENVIROSTOR, VCP, DEED Higher 823, 0.156, ESE E19 ALVISO ROCK INC 1252 STATE ST RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 784, 0.148, NNW E18 GEORGE MACIEL TRUCKI 1252 STATE STREET LUST Higher 784, 0.148, NNW E17 GEORGE MACIEL TRUCKI 1252 STATE ST LUST, HIST LUST Higher 776, 0.147, NW 16 CITY OF SJ-ALVISO SW 60 WILSON WY CUPA Listings, SAN JOSE HAZMAT Higher 752, 0.142, NE D15 WSP TRUCKING INC 1200 STATE HIST CORTESE Higher 467, 0.088, NW D14 WSP TRUCKING INC. 1200 STATE ST LUST, HIST LUST Higher 467, 0.088, NW B13 ESCALANTE MOBIL SERV 1228 TAYLOR ST SWEEPS UST, HIST UST Higher 422, 0.080, WNW C12 FIRE STATION #25 1590 GOLD ST SWEEPS UST, HIST UST Higher 396, 0.075, WNW C11 SAINTE CLAIRE LANDFI GOLD AND MOFFAT ST SWF/LF Higher 392, 0.074, West C10 SAN JOSE FIRE STATIO 1590 GOLD ST LUST, HIST LUST, HIST CORTESE Higher 392, 0.074, WNW C9 SPRINT FS04XC135 1700 GOLD ST SUITE C SAN JOSE HAZMAT Higher 392, 0.074, WNW B8 ALVISO INDEPENDENT O 1110 TAYLOR RCRA-SQG, ENVIROSTOR, FINDS, HWP Higher 365, 0.069, WNW 7 CITY OF SJ-ALVISO SW N 1ST & TONY P SANTO CUPA Listings Higher 301, 0.057, East 6 PRIVATE RESIDENCE PRIVATE RESIDENCE LUST Higher 148, 0.028, NW 5 SPRINT FS04XC192 5164 N 1ST ST SUITE SAN JOSE HAZMAT Higher 33, 0.006, NW 4 MONEYMAKER & HOXIE CROSS ROUTE 237 ASSE SLIC Higher 32, 0.006, West A3 AT&T MOBILITY-GOLD/H 1315 MOFFAT ST CUPA Listings Higher 13, 0.002, WNW A2 AT&T MOBILITY GOLD H 1315 MOFFAT ST SAN JOSE HAZMAT Higher 13, 0.002, WNW Reg SOUTH BAY ASBESTOS A FT OF LIBERTY ST GUA NPL, CERCLIS, US ENG CONTROLS, US INST CONTROL,... Same 1 ft. 1 VERIZON WIRELESS: AL 4701 N 1ST ST CUPA Listings TP

MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
4701 N. FIRST STREET
SAN JOSE, CA 95134
Click on Map ID to see full detail.

MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)

ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTION SITE NAME ADDRESS 4437954.2s Page 3
52 NOVELLUS SYSTEMS INC 4000 N FIRST ST ENVIROSTOR, WDS Higher 5079, 0.962, ESE 51 JDS UNIPHASE 80 ROSE ORCHARD WAY RCRA-LQG, ENVIROSTOR, FINDS, CUPA Listings, SAN... Higher 5025, 0.952, ESE 50 SAN JOSE/SANTA CLARA 700 LOS ESTEROS ROAD ENVIROSTOR, LUST, SLIC, HIST LUST, VCP, SWEEPS... Higher 5015, 0.950, ENE 49 WESTERN DIGITAL 5102 CALLE DEL SOL ENVIROSTOR Higher 4566, 0.865, SSE 48 AKASHIC MEMORIES COR 305 W TASMAN ENVIROSTOR, CHMIRS, EMI Higher 4325, 0.819, SE 47 SUPERTEX INC 71 VISTA MONTANA ENVIROSTOR, VCP, NPDES, WDS Higher 4269, 0.809, SE 46 SUN CIRCUITS INCORPO 5191 LAFAYETTE ST. RCRA-LQG, ENVIROSTOR, FINDS, WDS Higher 4181, 0.792, South 45 COATEK INC 2272 CALLE DE LUNA ENVIROSTOR, EMI, NPDES Higher 4102, 0.777, SSE K44 NU METAL FINISHING I 2262 CALLE DEL MUNDO ENVIROSTOR, CHMIRS, EMI, HIST CORTESE, NPDES, WDS Higher 3769, 0.714, SSE K43 ITALIX 2232 CALLE DEL MUNDO ENVIROSTOR, EMI, NPDES, WDS Higher 3658, 0.693, SSE 42 VISTA MONTANA PARK 4145 N. 1ST STREET ENVIROSTOR, VCP, SAN JOSE HAZMAT Higher 3500, 0.663, ESE 41 SILICON GENESIS CORP 145 BAYTECH DRIVE ENVIROSTOR, CUPA Listings Higher 2892, 0.548, East 40 ALL PURPOSE LANDFILL 5401 LAFAYETTE STREE ENVIROSTOR, CHMIRS, HIST CORTESE Higher 2802, 0.531, South J39 ALL PURPOSE LANDIFLL 5500 LAFAYETTE SWF/LF, LUST, CHMIRS, EMI, Financial Assurance,... Higher 2246, 0.425, South

MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
4701 N. FIRST STREET
SAN JOSE, CA 95134
Click on Map ID to see full detail.

MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)

ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTION SITE NAME ADDRESS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC4437954.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4

TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was identified in the following records. For more information on this property see page 8 of the attached EDR Radius Map report:

Site Database(s) EPA ID
VERIZON WIRELESS: AL
4701 N 1ST ST
SAN JOSE, CA 95134
CUPA Listings N/A

DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases:

STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List
CERC-NFRAP CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS Corrective Action Report
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-CESQG RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS Land Use Control Information System

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC4437954.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5
Federal ERNS list
ERNS Emergency Response Notification System
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
RESPONSE State Response Sites
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing
UST Active UST Facilities
AST Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities
INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing

ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY Recycler Database
HAULERS Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing
INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands ODI Open Dump Inventory
DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register
SCH School Property Evaluation Program
CDL Clandestine Drug Labs
Toxic Pits Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites
US CDL Clandestine Drug Labs
Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
CA FID UST Facility Inventory Database
Local Land Records
LIENS Environmental Liens Listing
LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC4437954.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
CHMIRS California Hazardous Material Incident Report System LDS Land Disposal Sites Listing
MCS Military Cleanup Sites Listing
SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites
DOD Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information

EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems
RMP Risk Management Plans
RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PADS PCB Activity Database System
FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data
CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations
UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites
US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem US MINES Mines Master Index File
FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
CA BOND EXP. PLAN Bond Expenditure Plan
DRYCLEANERS Cleaner Facilities
EMI Emissions Inventory Data
ENF Enforcement Action Listing
Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing HAZNET Facility and Manifest Data
HWT Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database
MINES Mines Site Location Listing
MWMP Medical Waste Management Program Listing
NPDES NPDES Permits Listing
PEST LIC Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing
PROC Certified Processors Database
Notify 65 Proposition 65 Records
UIC UIC Listing
WASTEWATER PITS Oil Wastewater Pits Listing
WDS Waste Discharge System

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC4437954.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7
WIP Well Investigation Program Case List

EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR US Hist Cleaners EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners

EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases.

Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property.

Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed.

Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases.

Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.

STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL: Also known as Superfund, the National Priority List database is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund program. The source of this database is the U.S. EPA.

A review of the NPL list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/26/2015 has revealed that there is 1 NPL site within approximately 1 mile of the target property.

Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SOUTH BAY ASBESTOS A FT OF LIBERTY ST GUA 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) 0 8 Federal CERCLIS list
CERCLIS: The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states,

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC4437954.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8
municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.

A review of the CERCLIS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/25/2013 has revealed that there is 1 CERCLIS site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.

Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SOUTH BAY ASBESTOS A FT OF LIBERTY ST GUA 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) 0 8 Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-SQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.

A review of the RCRA-SQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/09/2015 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA-SQG site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.

Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ALVISO INDEPENDENT O 1110 TAYLOR WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.069 mi.) B8 51 Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries US ENG CONTROLS: A listing of sites with engineering controls in place.

A review of the US ENG CONTROLS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/09/2015 has revealed that there is 1 US ENG CONTROLS site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.

Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SOUTH BAY ASBESTOS A FT OF LIBERTY ST GUA 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) 0 8 US INST CONTROL: A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls.

A review of the US INST CONTROL list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/09/2015 has revealed that there is 1 US INST CONTROL site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.

Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SOUTH BAY ASBESTOS A FT OF LIBERTY ST GUA 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) 0 8

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC4437954.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
ENVIROSTOR: The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites.

A review of the ENVIROSTOR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/03/2015 has revealed that there are 17 ENVIROSTOR sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property.

Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SOUTH BAY ASBESTOS A FT OF LIBERTY ST GUA 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) 0 8 Facility Id: 43490060
Status: Active
ALVISO INDEPENDENT O 1110 TAYLOR WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.069 mi.) B8 51 Facility Id: 80001742
Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation
CISCO SYSTEMS SITE 6 NORTH FIRST STREET A ESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.156 mi.) 20 69 Facility Id: 43010027
Status: Certified O&M - Land Use Restrictions Only
SANTA CLARA GATEWAY YERBA BUENA & LAFAYE SSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.416 mi.) J36 96 Facility Id: 43290008
Status: Certified / Operation & Maintenance
ALL PURPOSE LANDFILL 5401 LAFAYETTE STREE S 1/2 - 1 (0.531 mi.) 40 117 Facility Id: 43490056
Status: Refer: RWQCB
SILICON GENESIS CORP 145 BAYTECH DRIVE E 1/2 - 1 (0.548 mi.) 41 119 Facility Id: 60002120
Status: Active
VISTA MONTANA PARK 4145 N. 1ST STREET ESE 1/2 - 1 (0.663 mi.) 42 120 Facility Id: 60000294
Status: Active
ITALIX 2232 CALLE DEL MUNDO SSE 1/2 - 1 (0.693 mi.) K43 131 Facility Id: 71002788
Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation
NU METAL FINISHING I 2262 CALLE DEL MUNDO SSE 1/2 - 1 (0.714 mi.) K44 141 Facility Id: 71002694
Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation
COATEK INC 2272 CALLE DE LUNA SSE 1/2 - 1 (0.777 mi.) 45 152 Facility Id: 71003228
Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation
SUN CIRCUITS INCORPO 5191 LAFAYETTE ST. S 1/2 - 1 (0.792 mi.) 46 161 Facility Id: 71003561
Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation
SUPERTEX INC 71 VISTA MONTANA SE 1/2 - 1 (0.809 mi.) 47 165

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC4437954.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10
Facility Id: 71003060
Facility Id: 60000591
Status: Refer: Other Agency
Status: Inactive - Action Required
AKASHIC MEMORIES COR 305 W TASMAN SE 1/2 - 1 (0.819 mi.) 48 171 Facility Id: 71003087
Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation
WESTERN DIGITAL 5102 CALLE DEL SOL SSE 1/2 - 1 (0.865 mi.) 49 175 Facility Id: 71002774
Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation
SAN JOSE/SANTA CLARA 700 LOS ESTEROS ROAD ENE 1/2 - 1 (0.950 mi.) 50 176 Facility Id: 60001622
Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation
JDS UNIPHASE 80 ROSE ORCHARD WAY ESE 1/2 - 1 (0.952 mi.) 51 213 Facility Id: 71002948
Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation
NOVELLUS SYSTEMS INC 4000 N FIRST ST ESE 1/2 - 1 (0.962 mi.) 52 223 Facility Id: 71002971
Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF: The Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. The data come from the Integrated Waste Management Board’s Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) database.

A review of the SWF/LF list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/17/2015 has revealed that there are 3 SWF/LF sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.

Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SAINTE CLAIRE LANDFI GOLD AND MOFFAT ST W 0 - 1/8 (0.074 mi.) C11 56 Facility ID: 43-CR-0008
SYNTAX COURT D.S. SYNTAX CT, N 1ST ST. ESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.169 mi.) 24 80 Facility ID: 43-AN-0021
Operational Status: Closed
Regulation Status: Pre-regulations
ALL PURPOSE LANDIFLL 5500 LAFAYETTE S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.425 mi.) J39 113 Facility ID: 43-AO-0001
Operational Status: Closed
Regulation Status: Permitted
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LUST: The Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board Leaking Underground Storage Tank Information System.

A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/14/2015 has revealed that there are 10

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC4437954.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11
LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.

Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PRIVATE RESIDENCE PRIVATE RESIDENCE NW 0 - 1/8 (0.028 mi.) 6 49 Status: Completed - Case Closed
Global Id: T0608501811
SAN JOSE FIRE STATIO 1590 GOLD ST WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.074 mi.) C10 54 Status: Completed - Case Closed
Facility Status: Case Closed
Date Closed: 01/28/2002
Global Id: T0608501172
SCVWD ID: 06S1W09G01F
date9: 1/28/2002
WSP TRUCKING INC. 1200 STATE ST NW 0 - 1/8 (0.088 mi.) D14 59 Status: Completed - Case Closed
Facility Status: Case Closed
Date Closed: 10/18/1995
Global Id: T0608501602
SCVWD ID: 06S1W10D01F
date9: 10/18/1995
GEORGE MACIEL TRUCKI 1252 STATE ST NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.147 mi.) E17 62 Facility Status: Preliminary site assessment underway
GEORGE MACIEL TRUCKI 1252 STATE STREET NNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.148 mi.) E18 62 Status: Open - Site Assessment
Global Id: T0608552020
SCVWD ID: 06S1W09H01F
ACME BUILDING MAINTE 941 CATHERINE ST WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.212 mi.) H30 82 Status: Completed - Case Closed
Facility Status: Case Closed
Date Closed: 11/08/1995
Global Id: T0608500098
SCVWD ID: 06S1W09G02F
date9: 11/8/1995
SAN JOSE CITY OF PUM 3519 GOLD SSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.321 mi.) 33 91 Status: Completed - Case Closed
Date Closed: 07/03/2000
Global Id: T0608500420
SCVWD ID: 06S1W09G03F
ALL PURPOSE LANDFILL 5500 LAFAYETTE ST S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.425 mi.) J38 112 Facility Id: 43-2041
Facility Status: Case Closed
date9: 4/18/1995
ALL PURPOSE LANDIFLL 5500 LAFAYETTE S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.425 mi.) J39 113 Date Closed: 04/18/1995
SCVWD ID: 06S1W16A01F
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ REBAR SPACER BLOCK C 1400 STATE ST N 1/4 - 1/2 (0.346 mi.) I35 93 Status: Completed - Case Closed
Facility Status: Case Closed
Date Closed: 11/14/1995

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC4437954.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 12
Global Id: T0608501092
SCVWD ID: 06S1W09A01F
date9: 11/14/1995
SLIC: SLIC Region comes from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board.

A review of the SLIC list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/14/2015 has revealed that there are 3 SLIC sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.

Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ MONEYMAKER & HOXIE CROSS ROUTE 237 ASSE W 0 - 1/8 (0.006 mi.) 4 49 Facility Id: SL18345765
FORMER BAYSIDE CANNE 1290 HOPE STREET WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.245 mi.) H32 91 Global Id: SL0608573060
Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ VOYAGER MARINE 1296 STATE STREET NNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.200 mi.) G25 80 Global Id: SL0608571140
Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed
HIST LUST: A listing of open and closed leaking underground storage tanks. This listing is no longer updated by the county. Leaking underground storage tanks are now handled by the Department of Environmental Health.

A review of the HIST LUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/29/2005 has revealed that there are 6 HIST LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.

Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SAN JOSE FIRE STATIO 1590 GOLD ST WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.074 mi.) C10 54 SCVWD ID: 06S1W09G01
WSP TRUCKING INC. 1200 STATE ST NW 0 - 1/8 (0.088 mi.) D14 59 SCVWD ID: 06S1W10D01
GEORGE MACIEL TRUCKI 1252 STATE ST NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.147 mi.) E17 62 SCVWD ID: 06S1W09H01
ACME BUILDING MAINTE 941 CATHERINE ST WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.212 mi.) H30 82 SCVWD ID: 06S1W09G02
ALL PURPOSE LANDFILL 5500 LAFAYETTE ST S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.425 mi.) J38 112 SCVWD ID: 06S1W16A01
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ REBAR SPACER BLOCK C 1400 STATE ST N 1/4 - 1/2 (0.346 mi.) I35 93 SCVWD ID: 06S1W09A01

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC4437954.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 13
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP: Contains low threat level properties with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents have request that DTSC oversee investigation and/or cleanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for DTSC’s costs.

A review of the VCP list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/03/2015 has revealed that there are 2 VCP sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.

Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CISCO SYSTEMS SITE 6 NORTH FIRST STREET A ESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.156 mi.) 20 69 Status: Certified O&M - Land Use Restrictions Only
Facility Id: 43010027
SANTA CLARA GATEWAY YERBA BUENA & LAFAYE SSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.416 mi.) J36 96 Status: Certified / Operation & Maintenance
Facility Id: 43290008
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS: A listing of sites the SWRCB considers to be Brownfields since these are sites have come to them through the MOA Process.

A review of the BROWNFIELDS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/25/2015 has revealed that there is 1 BROWNFIELDS site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.

Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ FORMER BAYSIDE CANNE 1290 HOPE STREET WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.245 mi.) H32 91

ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
WMUDS/SWAT: The Waste Management Unit Database System is used for program tracking and inventory of waste management units. The source is the State Water Resources Control Board.

A review of the WMUDS/SWAT list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/01/2000 has revealed that there is 1 WMUDS/SWAT site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.

Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ALL PURPOSE LANDFILL 5500 LAFAYETTE STREE S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.425 mi.) J37 109

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC4437954.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 14
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
HIST Cal-Sites: Formerly known as ASPIS, this database contains both known and potential hazardous substance sites. The source is the California Department of Toxic Substance Control. No longer updated by the state agency. It has been replaced by ENVIROSTOR.

A review of the HIST Cal-Sites list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/08/2005 has revealed that there is 1 HIST Cal-Sites site within approximately 1 mile of the target property.

Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SOUTH BAY ASBESTOS A FT OF LIBERTY ST GUA 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) 0 8 Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
SWEEPS UST: Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990’s. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list.

A review of the SWEEPS UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/01/1994 has revealed that there are 3 SWEEPS UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.

Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ FIRE STATION #25 1590 GOLD ST WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.075 mi.) C12 57 Status: A
Tank Status: A
Comp Number: 40733
ESCALANTE MOBIL SERV 1228 TAYLOR ST WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.080 mi.) B13 58 Status: A
Tank Status: A
Comp Number: 54699
ACME BUILDING MAINTE 941 CATHERINE ST WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.212 mi.) H30 82 Status: A
Tank Status: A
Comp Number: 65727
HIST UST: Historical UST Registered Database.

A review of the HIST UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/15/1990 has revealed that there are 4 HIST UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.

Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ FIRE STATION #25 1590 GOLD ST WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.075 mi.) C12 57 Facility Id: 00000040733
ESCALANTE MOBIL SERV 1228 TAYLOR ST WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.080 mi.) B13 58 Facility Id: 00000054699
ACME BUILDING MAINTE 941 CATHERINE ST. WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.212 mi.) H29 82 Facility Id: 00000065727
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ALVISO PUMP STATION 3519 GOLD STREET NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.166 mi.) 21 79

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC4437954.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 15
Facility Id: 00000068969
Local Land Records
DEED: The use of recorded land use restrictions is one of the methods the DTSC uses to protect the public from unsafe exposures to hazardous substances and wastes .

A review of the DEED list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/08/2015 has revealed that there are 3 DEED sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.

Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SOUTH BAY ASBESTOS A FT OF LIBERTY ST GUA 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) 0 8 Status: ACTIVE
Envirostor ID: 43490060
CISCO SYSTEMS SITE 6 NORTH FIRST STREET A ESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.156 mi.) 20 69 Status: CERTIFIED O&M - LAND USE RESTRICTIONS ONLY
Envirostor ID: 43010027
SANTA CLARA GATEWAY YERBA BUENA & LAFAYE SSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.416 mi.) J36 96 Status: CERTIFIED / OPERATION & MAINTENANCE
Envirostor ID: 43290008
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste.

A review of the RCRA NonGen / NLR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/09/2015 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA NonGen / NLR site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.

Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ALVISO ROCK INC 1252 STATE ST NNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.148 mi.) E19 67 ROD: Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid the cleanup.

A review of the ROD list, as provided by EDR, and dated 11/25/2013 has revealed that there is 1 ROD site within approximately 1 mile of the target property.

Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SOUTH BAY ASBESTOS A FT OF LIBERTY ST GUA 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) 0 8

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC4437954.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 16
PRP: A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties A review of the PRP list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/25/2013 has revealed that there is 1 PRP site within approximately 0.001 miles of the target property.

Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SOUTH BAY ASBESTOS A FT OF LIBERTY ST GUA 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) 0 8 ICIS: The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program.

A review of the ICIS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/23/2015 has revealed that there is 1 ICIS site within approximately 0.001 miles of the target property.

Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SOUTH BAY ASBESTOS A FT OF LIBERTY ST GUA 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) 0 8 Cortese: The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board (LUST), the Integrated Waste Board (SWF/LS), and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (Cal-Sites).

A review of the Cortese list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/24/2015 has revealed that there is 1 Cortese site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.

Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SOUTH BAY ASBESTOS A FT OF LIBERTY ST GUA 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) 0 8 Envirostor Id: 43490060
Cleanup Status: ACTIVE - LAND USE RESTRICTIONS
CUPA Listings: A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database.

California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities.

A review of the CUPA Listings list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 5 CUPA Listings sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.

Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ AT&T MOBILITY-GOLD/H 1315 MOFFAT ST WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.002 mi.) A3 48 CITY OF SJ-ALVISO SW N 1ST & TONY P SANTO E 0 - 1/8 (0.057 mi.) 7 51 CITY OF SJ-ALVISO SW 60 WILSON WY NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.142 mi.) 16 62 OAKCREST ESTATES MHC 4271 N 1ST ST SSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.169 mi.) F23 79 Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ INDIGO POOLS INC 1341 ARCHER ST STOR NNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.200 mi.) G26 81

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC4437954.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 17
HIST CORTESE: The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency.

A review of the HIST CORTESE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/01/2001 has revealed that there are 7 HIST CORTESE sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.

Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SOUTH BAY ASBESTOS A FT OF LIBERTY ST GUA 0 - 1/8 (0.000 mi.) 0 8 Reg Id: 43490060
SAN JOSE FIRE STATIO 1590 GOLD ST WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.074 mi.) C10 54 Reg Id: 43-1184
WSP TRUCKING INC 1200 STATE NW 0 - 1/8 (0.088 mi.) D15 61 Reg Id: 43-1651
ACME BUILDING MAINTE 941 CATHERINE ST. WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.212 mi.) H29 82 Reg Id: 43-0027
SAN JOSE CITY OF PUM 3519 GOLD SSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.321 mi.) 33 91 Reg Id: 43-0366
ALL PURPOSE LANDIFLL 5500 LAFAYETTE S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.425 mi.) J39 113 Reg Id: 43-2041
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ REBAR SPACER BLOCK C 1400 STATE N 1/4 - 1/2 (0.342 mi.) I34 93 Reg Id: 43-1100
HWP: Detailed information on permitted hazardous waste facilities and corrective action ("cleanups") tracked in EnviroStor.

A review of the HWP list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/24/2015 has revealed that there are 2 HWP sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property.

Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ALVISO INDEPENDENT O 1110 TAYLOR WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.069 mi.) B8 51 EPA Id: CAD980695340
Cleanup Status: UNKNOWN
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ALVISO INDEPENDENT O 5002 ARCHER ST NNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.236 mi.) G31 85 EPA Id: CAL000048571
EPA Id: CAL000161743
Cleanup Status: UNKNOWN
Cleanup Status: UNDERGOING CLOSURE

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC4437954.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 18
SAN JOSE HAZMAT: San Jose Hazmat Facilities.

A review of the SAN JOSE HAZMAT list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/10/2015 has revealed that there are 6 SAN JOSE HAZMAT sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.

Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ AT&T MOBILITY GOLD H 1315 MOFFAT ST WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.002 mi.) A2 48 File Num: 410728
SPRINT FS04XC192 5164 N 1ST ST SUITE NW 0 - 1/8 (0.006 mi.) 5 49 File Num: 407275
SPRINT FS04XC135 1700 GOLD ST SUITE C WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.074 mi.) C9 53 File Num: 411921
CITY OF SJ-ALVISO SW 60 WILSON WY NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.142 mi.) 16 62 File Num: 602443
OAKCREST ESTATES MHC 4271 N 1ST ST SSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.169 mi.) F23 79 File Num: 401324
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ INDIGO POOL SERVICE 1341 ARCHER ST SUITE NNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.200 mi.) G27 81 File Num: 401399

EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR US Hist Auto Stat: EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches.

A review of the EDR US Hist Auto Stat list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 2 EDR US Hist Auto Stat sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.

Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ Not reported 4271 N 1ST ST SSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.169 mi.) F22 79 Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ Not reported 1341 ARCHER NNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.200 mi.) G28 81

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC4437954.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 19
Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped. Count: 5 records.

Site Name Database(s)
____________ ____________

MARSHLAND SOLID WASTE FACILITY SWF/LF
AGNEWS DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER 1 LUST

MARSHLAND DISPOSAL SITE ODI

MARSHLAND DEVELOPMENTS, INC ENVIROSTOR

OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP LDFL- ENVIROSTOR
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.

EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
Database Property (Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted

STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL 1.000 1 0 0 0 NR 1
Proposed NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
NPL LIENS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
CERCLIS 0.500 1 0 0 NR NR 1
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List
CERC-NFRAP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
RCRA-SQG 0.250 1 0 NR NR NR 1
RCRA-CESQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
Federal institutional controls /
engineering controls registries
LUCIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
US ENG CONTROLS 0.500 1 0 0 NR NR 1
US INST CONTROL 0.500 1 0 0 NR NR 1
Federal ERNS list
ERNS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
RESPONSE 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
ENVIROSTOR 1.000 2 1 1 13 NR 17
State and tribal landfill and/or
solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF 0.500 1 1 1 NR NR 3
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LUST 0.500 3 3 4 NR NR 10
TC4437954.2s Page 4

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
Database Property (Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted INDIAN LUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
SLIC 0.500 1 2 0 NR NR 3
HIST LUST 0.500 2 2 2 NR NR 6
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
AST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
INDIAN UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
VCP 0.500 0 1 1 NR NR 2
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 1 0 NR NR 1

ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid
Waste Disposal Sites
WMUDS/SWAT 0.500 0 0 1 NR NR 1
SWRCY 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
HAULERS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
INDIAN ODI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
ODI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
DEBRIS REGION 9 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Local Lists of Hazardous waste /
Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
HIST Cal-Sites 1.000 1 0 0 0 NR 1
SCH 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
CDL 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
Toxic Pits 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
US CDL 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
SWEEPS UST 0.250 2 1 NR NR NR 3
HIST UST 0.250 2 2 NR NR NR 4
CA FID UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
Local Land Records
LIENS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
LIENS 2 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
DEED 0.500 1 1 1 NR NR 3
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
TC4437954.2s Page 5

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
Database Property (Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted CHMIRS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
LDS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
MCS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
SPILLS 90 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR 0.250 0 1 NR NR NR 1
FUDS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
DOD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
US FIN ASSUR 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
EPA WATCH LIST 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
2020 COR ACTION 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
TSCA 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
TRIS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
SSTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
ROD 1.000 1 0 0 0 NR 1
RMP 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
RAATS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
PRP 0.001 1 NR NR NR NR 1
PADS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
ICIS 0.001 1 NR NR NR NR 1
FTTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
MLTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
COAL ASH DOE 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
COAL ASH EPA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
PCB TRANSFORMER 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
RADINFO 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
HIST FTTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
DOT OPS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
CONSENT 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
INDIAN RESERV 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
UMTRA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
LEAD SMELTERS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
US AIRS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
US MINES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
FINDS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
CA BOND EXP. PLAN 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Cortese 0.500 1 0 0 NR NR 1
CUPA Listings 0.250 1 2 3 NR NR NR 6
DRYCLEANERS 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
EMI 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
ENF 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
Financial Assurance 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
HAZNET 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
HIST CORTESE 0.500 3 1 3 NR NR 7
HWP 1.000 1 1 0 0 NR 2
HWT 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
MINES 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
MWMP 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
NPDES 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
TC4437954.2s Page 6

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
Database Property (Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted PEST LIC 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
PROC 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Notify 65 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
SAN JOSE HAZMAT 0.250 3 3 NR NR NR 6
UIC 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
WASTEWATER PITS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
WDS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
WIP 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0

EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
EDR US Hist Auto Stat 0.250 0 2 NR NR NR 2
EDR US Hist Cleaners 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0

EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA LF 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
RGA LUST 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
- Totals -- 1 33 26 14 13 0 87
NOTES:

TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
TC4437954.2s Page 7
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
Program Description: HMBP FACILITY, 1-3 CHEMICALS
PE#: BP01
Region: SANTA CLARA
CUPA SANTA CLARA:

Actual:
6 ft.

Property SAN JOSE, CA 95134
Target 4701 N 1ST ST N/A
1 VERIZON WIRELESS: ALVISO CUPA Listings S112347079
Pathway: Not reported
CAS #: Not reported
Substance: Not reported
Substance ID: Not reported
NPL Status: Currently on the Final NPL
Substance Details:

Date Finalized: 06/10/86
Date Deleted: Not reported
Date Proposed: 10/15/84
EPA Region: 09
Site County: SANTA CLARA
Federal Site: No
Site State: CA
Site City: ALVISO
Site Zip: 95002
Site Status: Final
Site Name: SOUTH BAY ASBESTOS AREA
Site Details:

Category Value: 10
Category Description: Distance To Nearest Population-> 0 And <= 1/4 Mile NPL Status: Currently on the Final NPL
Category Value: 14
Category Description: Depth To Aquifer-> 10 And <= 25 Feet NPL Status: Currently on the Final NPL
Category Details:

Site Score: 44.68
Final Date: 1986-06-10 00:00:00
Federal: G
EPA Region: 9
Cerclis ID: 0902250
EPA ID: CAD980894885
NPL:

HIST CORTESE
Cortese
ICIS
PRP
ROD
DEED
HIST Cal-Sites
1 ft. ENVIROSTOR
< 1/8 US INST CONTROL
ALVISO, CA 95002 US ENG CONTROLS
Region FT OF LIBERTY ST GUADALUPE RIV CAD980894885 CERCLIS NPL SOUTH BAY ASBESTOS AREA NPL 1000405018
TC4437954.2s Page 8
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
State: CA
City: ALVISO
NPL Name: SOUTH BAY ASBESTOS AREA
Narratives Details:

Deleted Date: Not reported
Final Date: 06/10/1986
Proposed Date: 10/15/1984
NPL Status: Final
Site Status Details:
measures are being considered to further reduce exposures to asbestos fibers. residents to potentially significant levels of asbestosfibers. Additional October 1985, two areas of the town were paved to prevent exposure of remedial investigation is scheduled to begin in the spring of 1986. In contamination at the site and identify alternatives for remedial action. The remedial investigation/feasibility study to determine the extent of Interagency Agreement with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to conduct a species. Status June 10, 1986): In July l985, EPA entered into an Wildlife Refuge, which borders the town and harbors several endangered Evening winds may transport asbestos to the San Francisco Bay National l-square-mile area to determine the degree of risk to public health. the State plan to continue sampling the soil and air throughout the asbestos-laden dust, posing a potential health risk to residents. EPA and tests conducted by the State. Construction activities and wind action stir up Soil in the old landfill and around homes contains asbestos, according to site was first proposed for listing under the name Alviso Dumping Areas. used for fill material at various locations throughout the town. The asbestos waste inan old municipal landfill. In addition, asbestos waste was Bay, served as dumping areas for over 30 years. Companies disposed of located in north Santa Clara County on the southern edge of the San Francisco Conditions at proposal October 15, 1984): Portions of Alviso, California, Summary Details:

Scoring: 3
Pathway: SURFACE WATER PATHWAY
CAS #: 1332-21-4
Substance: ASBESTOS
Substance ID: U013
NPL Status: Currently on the Final NPL
Scoring: 3
Pathway: GROUND WATER PATHWAY
CAS #: 1332-21-4
Substance: ASBESTOS
Substance ID: U013
NPL Status: Currently on the Final NPL
Scoring: 4
Pathway: AIR PATHWAY
CAS #: 1332-21-4
Substance: ASBESTOS
Substance ID: U013
NPL Status: Currently on the Final NPL
Scoring: Not reported
SOUTH BAY ASBESTOS AREA (Continued) 1000405018
TC4437954.2s Page 9
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
Contact Title: Site Assessment Manager (SAM)
Contact Tel: Not reported
Contact Name: Carl Brickner
Contact ID: 13004003.00000
Contact Email: Not reported
Contact Title: Site Assessment Manager (SAM)
Contact Tel: (415) 972-4250
Contact Name: Sharon Murray
Contact ID: 13003858.00000
Contact Email: Not reported
Contact Title: Site Assessment Manager (SAM)
Contact Tel: (415) 972-3978
Contact Name: Leslie Ramirez
Contact ID: 13003854.00000
Contact Email: Not reported
Contact Title: On-Scene Coordinator (OSC)
Contact Tel: (415) 972-3075
Contact Name: Steven Calanog
Contact ID: 9270486.00000
CERCLIS Site Contact Name(s):

Site FUDS Flag: Not reported
Alias EPA ID: Not reported
CC Concurrence FY: 1998
CC Concurrence Date: 09/23/98
Site Fips Code: 06085
Non NPL Status Date: / /
Non NPL Status: Not reported
RResp Fed Agency Code: Not reported
RBRAC Code: Not reported
DMNSN Unit Code: ACRE
NPL Status: Currently on the Final NPL
Site Settings Code: SU
Classification: City Contamination
EPA Region: 09
RST Code: T
Parent ID: Not reported
NFRAP Flag: Not reported
Site Init By Prog: Not reported
USGS Quadrangle: Not reported
RCRA ID: Not reported
Site Orphan Flag: N
DMNSN Number: 550.00000
Federal Facility: Not a Federal Facility
USGC Hydro Unit: 18050003
SMSA Number: 7400
IFMS ID: 0942
Congressional District: 17
Short Name: SOUTH BAY ASBESTOS AREA
Facility County: SANTA CLARA
EPA ID: CAD980894885
Site ID: 0902250
CERCLIS:

SOUTH BAY ASBESTOS AREA (Continued) 1000405018
TC4437954.2s Page 10
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
species use the wetlands and surrounding upland habitats (i.e., land elevated (Falco peregrinus). Small mammals and a great number of birds and waterfowl lonqirostris obsoletus), Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos), and Peregrine Falcon Harvest Mouse (Reithrodontomys raviventris), California Clapper Rail (Rallus support several endangered or threatened species, including the Salt Marsh provide an interface between fresh and saltwater environments. The wetlands wetlands adjacent to Alviso are a significant wildlife habitat because they approximately 2.82 acres of wetlands were buried under the levee. The approximately 300 acres. The ring levee was partially constructed in wetlands; wetlands survives as the New Chicago Marsh, a National Wildlife Refuge covering San Francisco Bay have been filled or altered. Near Alviso, a fragment of Over the last century, most of the tidal flats and marshlands which surround effects of subsidence. The community of Alviso is adjacent to Bay wetlands. raised with soil and debris fill, some containing asbestos, to offset the potential for flooding. The land surrounding Alviso has been artificially six feet, to an elevation below sea level, significantly increasing the pumping caused the ground surface of the Santa Clara Valley to subside four to from irrigations wells. Between 1934 and 1967, aquifer compaction due to over agriculture in the region was facilitated by widespread ground water withdrawal Bay, further impeding natural drainage into the Bay. The development of high tides. Numerous salt evaporation ponds are present between Alviso and the are under tidal influence and therefore, discharge to the Bay is impeded during Water District (SCVWD) to provide for greater flood flow capacity. The streams flooding. The Guadalupe River was channelized in 1963 by the Santa Clara Valley do not provide natural local drainage since they are leveed to prevent overbank enter the Bay to the west and north-east of Alviso, respectively. These rivers region every few years. Two major streams, the Guadalupe River and Coyote Creek elevation and proximity to the Bay. Flood-producing storms occur within the and northeast. Alviso is highly susceptible to flooding, due to its low Santa Clara to the west and south and expanding office development to the east section of the Silicon Valley between Highway 237 to the south, rapidly growing Approximately 1700 residents live in Alviso. The town is located in a quiet industrial and agricultural land uses, comprising an area of about 550 acres. encompasses the community of Alviso, is a mix of residential, commercial, light Valley and at the southernmost extent of San Francisco Bay. The site, which Site Description: The South Bay Asbestos site is located at the northern end of the Santa Clara Alias Comments: PREVIOUS EPA ID# AZD 981 416 977
Alias ID: 201
ALVISO, CA 95002
Alias Address: FT OF LIBERTY ST GUADALUPE RIV
Alias Name: SOUTH BAY ASBESTOS AREA
Alias ID: 203
SANTA CLARA, CA 95054
Alias Address: FT OF LIBERTY ST GUADALUPE RIV
Alias Name: SOUTH BAY ASBESTOS AREA
Alias ID: 202
CA
Alias Address: Not reported
Alias Name: ALVISO (PREVIOUS NAME)
Alias ID: 201
ALVISO, CA 95002
Alias Address: W OF INTER OF LIBERTY & MOFFAT
Alias Name: ALVISO AREA
Alias ID: 101
CERCLIS Site Alias Name(s):

Contact Email: Not reported
SOUTH BAY ASBESTOS AREA (Continued) 1000405018
TC4437954.2s Page 11
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
complete removal of the levee, assuming it could be accomplished in a safe associated with disposing of the removed, material. The 1988 ROD noted that with replacing the levee’s flood protection function, and the difficulties operation, the institutional, regulatory, and technical problems associated proportionally greater potential for asbestos releases during removal the levee, an option that EPA did not select due to its high cost, the noted that the PRPs had indicated an interest in pursuing complete removal of preferred the complete removal of the asbestos-contaminated levee. The ROD Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs) and many of the community members Although the cover proposal received a generally favorable review, the of Decision selecting a vegetated soil cover for the levee in September 1988.

Operable Unit Feasibility Study (OUFS) for the ring levee, and signed a Record July of 1988 and again in October of 1989. In April 1988, EPA released the activities at the Environmental Education Center. The City sprayed the levee in periodically applying the sealant and to conduct operation and maintenance Agreement with EPA which required the City to maintain the levee by again in 1987. In April 1988, the City of San Jose signed a Consent EPA also sprayed the ring levee with a dust suppressing polymer in 1986 and Education Center, located within the New Chicago Marsh, to the east of Alviso. debris pile and chip sealing the road and parking lot at the Environmental School, paving an unpaved section of Spreckles Avenue, and removing an asbestos exposure around the town, including paving a lot adjacent to the George Mayne state in 1986, EPA conducted several emergency measures to reduce asbestos October 1984, with a score of 44.68. After assuming the lead role from the National Priorities List (NPL) in June of 1984, and was listed on the NPL in asbestos. The South Bay Asbestos Area site was proposed for inclusion on the from Azevedo Quarry, which was later found to contain up to 40% issued for the levee. The levee was constructed with serpentine soil and rock obtain an "after the fact permit" from the COE; however, no permit was ever and did not consult with other federal and state agencies. San Jose planned to the Army Corps of Engineers (COE), who has jurisdiction over such construction, urgency of the situation, San Jose did not obtain the necessary permits from existing and possible future flood waters from the community. Because of the existing levees. The ring levee was constructed in an attempt to divert town for sixteen days as flood waters overtopped the Coyote Creek channels and measure during a flood in March 1983, which caused the evacuation of the entire and weeds. The City of San Jose constructed the ring levee as an emergency levee. Areas removed from public access tend to be well-vegetated with grasses vegetation. In addition, it appears that motor vehicles may also drive over the bicycles on or adjacent to the levee. The levee in these areas is barren of walking and jogging along the berm, playing on the slopes, picnicking or riding a pedestrian walkway. Residents, and particularly children, have been seen town. The levee immediately adjacent to streets and homes is used heavily as levee to prevent foot traffic. The levee terminates at the northwestern end of western end, the levee borders two private homes. One home owner has fenced the along Spreckles Avenue and along the commercial truckyard operations. At its Street. The steep outboard or bayward side of the levee abuts wetlands areas where it continues behind the commercial trucking operations along State Spreckles Ave. The levee is isolated from public streets along the northwest, eastern side of Alviso (the O’Neil Tract), and continues along Grand Blvd. and crest. The ring levee immediately adjoins School Street, the homes on the eight acres. A narrow, approximately two-foot wide path exists along the side slopes generally steeper than 2:1, and covers an area of approximately feet in height, two miles in length, and has a trapezoidal shape. The levee has approximately 25,000 cubic yards of material and is approximately four to six the community of Alviso on the east, north, and northwest, was constructed of above the water level of the marsh). The ring levee, which extends around SOUTH BAY ASBESTOS AREA (Continued) 1000405018
TC4437954.2s Page 12
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
ring levee, and unpaved truck yards with significant vehicular traffic. By transported from the asbestos contaminated soil material in unpaved roads, the asbestos. It was believed that this asbestos in the street dust was being street sweeping was therefore abandoned in Alviso due to the presence of one percent action level in the samples of surface street dust. Conventional Investigation (1986-1988), asbestos was detected in trace amounts and above the ROD requires monthly wet sweeping of Alviso streets. During the Remedial Five-Year Reviews for the Ring Levee operable unit in the future. The OU2 no asbestos contamination left in place, there is no requirement for conducting 1994 and removal of the temporary levee was completed in 1997. Since there was removal of the asbestos-containing flood control ring levee was completed in temporary levee following completion of the flood control project. The total temporary replacement levee with clean soil material, and 3) Removal of the to the completion of Coyote Creek Flood Control Project, 2) Construction of a Ring Levee OU was issued in 1993 allowing: 1) Removal of the ring levee prior soil sampling. An Explanation of Significant Differences (ESD) relating to the during levee removal, and 5) asbestos air monitoring and confirmation asbestos lost wetland values, 4) implementation of dust control measures prior to and the previously existing wetlands underlying the levee as well as mitigation for material in compliance with state and federal requirements, 3) restoration of the Coyote Creek Flood Control Project, 2) off-site disposal of the levee removal of the entire asbestos contaminated ring levee following completion of Amendment in June 1991 selected a remedy with the following components: 1) preferred that the entire ring levee be removed. Consequently, an OU1 ROD have required capping the levee in place. However, the Alviso community original Ring Levee OU1 ROD in September, 1988 selected a remedy which would two-miles long), it posed the most serious threat to public health. The the SBA Site (as much as 40 percent) and covered the most area (almost soil. Because the ring levee contained the highest levels of asbestos within established the remediation goal of less than one percent asbestos in soil disturbance. Based on the detection limit for asbestos at that time, EPA health came through the inhalation pathway for asbestos that may result from extensive ambient air sampling, found that the most significant risk to human to determine cleanup goals for the Site. The quantitative studies, including characterization instead of Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements for asbestos in soils at the time of the 1989 ROD, EPA used a quantitative risk completed in June 1991. Since there were no health-based standards available 1989. A Record of Decision Amendment addressing Operable Unit 1 was monitoring. A ROD addressing Operable Unit 2 was completed in September inspections, and deed restrictions on landfills; and routine maintenance and wet sweeping; removal of asbestos waste debris; cover requirements, suitable resurfacing material; control of street dust emissions through monthly includes: paving contaminated truck and industrial yards with asphalt or other site that were not included in the Ring Levee Operable Unit. The overall remedy for the overall South Bay Asbestos Area site, to address those portions of the February 1989, and in September 1989, EPA signed a second Record of Decision Study for the South Bay Asbestos Area Site was released for public comment in Section 122 were sent in August 1988. The Remedial Investigation/Feasibility 1987 and to Raisch in February 1988. Special Notice letters pursuant to CERCLA supplier of the material. EPA sent general notice letters to San Jose in July Company. San Jose constructed the levee and A.J Raisch Paving Company was the potentially responsible parties, the City of San Jose and A.J. Raisch Paving Decision to select the removal alternative. EPA has identified two problems associated with this option, EPA would consider amending the Record of proposed to remove the levee, and could identify acceptable solutions to the would be a permanent solution. The ROD further stated that if the PRPs formally manner, would be at least as protective as the selected soil cover remedy and SOUTH BAY ASBESTOS AREA (Continued) 1000405018
TC4437954.2s Page 13
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
determined in the Third Five-Year Review Report that an ESD to the ROD should Regulations by the California State Integrated Waste Management Board. EPA Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region, and Title 27 Landfill Closure State agencies: as a Class III landfill by the California Regional Water notice recorded in its chain of title and is regulated by the following two recorded in its chain of title, however, this capped landfill does have a deed California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Land Use Covenant Marshland Landfill, also known as the Highway 237 Landfill, has not had a inspected and maintained by present and future owners and operators. The for the landfill areas were deed restrictions to ensure that the cover is requirements. Therefore, under the OU2 ROD, the only remedial action required acceptable and that the landfills were in compliance with NESHAPs cover that the soil covers at the Santos, Marshland, and Sainte Claire Landfills were review of asbestos sampling results and landfill closure plans it determined or other paving material would also meet these requirements. Based on EPA’s waste has been buried. Other suitable cover material such as concrete, asphalt cover or six inches of vegetated soil cover where it is known that asbestos Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) call for two feet of non-vegetated soil requirements under the Clean Air Act’s National Emissions Standards for control requirements for cover material thickness. The landfill cover former landfills after verifying that the three landfill areas met the asbestos 1953 until 1982. The OU2 ROD requires placing of deed restrictions on these received asbestos waste from an asbestos-cement pipe manufacturing plant from Site (Santos, Marshland, and Sainte Claire Landfills) were thought to have part of the remedy in the OU2 ROD. Three former landfills within the SBA levee), therefore; wet sweeping of Alviso streets is no longer required as a being controlled (landfill covers) or have been removed (truck yards and ring concern in the street dust because the major sources of asbestos exposure are confirmed that asbestos had been effectively eliminated as a contaminant of evaluation or remedial action is recommended. The results of this study traffic on the streets) are below risk-based levels of concern. No further typical dust generating activities in the Alviso community (including vehicular asbestos exposure assessment, EPA concluded that asbestos exposures from the analytical sensitivity of 0.25 percent. Based on the results of this All of these test results were non-detect for asbestos in street soil dust at from residential street dust throughout Alviso were also analyzed for asbestos. detectable amounts of asbestos fibers. A total of 20 soil samples collected were non-detect and the remaining 10 samples had very low concentrations of which were collected in the residential streets of Alviso. Of these samples, 24 ABS air samples were collected throughout the SBA Site including 34 samples method of measuring personal exposure to airborne asbestos. A total of 83 called "activity-based sampling" (ABS) and is considered a more representative fibers like driving a vehicle, riding a bike, or running on a field. This is simulating soil-disturbing activities that might cause exposure to asbestos Air samples were taken in the breathing zone of EPA technicians while site. This issue was identified during the Five-Year Review conducted in 2005. percent or less asbestos in soil) were sufficiently protective for the SBA sampling to address whether or not cleanup actions (previously based on one yards and landfill areas. In August 2007, EPA conducted additional asbestos within the SBA Site had been addressed including the ring levee, the truck operation. By 1994, all major sources of asbestos that required remediation the streets while emitting a minimal amount of dust during the sweeping been an effective method of removing debris and dust that had accumulated in part of a permanent City-wide street cleaning program in San Jose. This has streets on a monthly basis since the 1989 ROD was issued. This activity is now streets. The City of San Jose has routinely conducted wet sweeping of Alviso 1989, a considerable amount of dust had accumulated in the gutters of the SOUTH BAY ASBESTOS AREA (Continued) 1000405018
TC4437954.2s Page 14
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
Operable Unit: SITEWIDE
Priority Level: Higher priority for further assessment
Date Completed: 04/01/84
Date Started: / /
Action: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT
Action Code: 001
For detailed financial records, contact EDR for a Site Report.:

Action Anomaly: Not reported
Urgency Indicator: Not reported
Planning Status: Not reported
Primary Responsibility: EPA Fund-Financed
Operable Unit: SITEWIDE
Priority Level: Not reported
Date Completed: 04/01/84
Date Started: / /
Action: HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM PACKAGE
Action Code: 001
For detailed financial records, contact EDR for a Site Report.:

Action Anomaly: Not reported
Urgency Indicator: Not reported
Planning Status: Not reported
Primary Responsibility: EPA Fund-Financed
Operable Unit: SITEWIDE
Priority Level: Higher priority for further assessment
Date Completed: 04/01/84
Date Started: / /
Action: SITE INSPECTION
Action Code: 001
For detailed financial records, contact EDR for a Site Report.:

Action Anomaly: Not reported
Urgency Indicator: Not reported
Planning Status: Not reported
Primary Responsibility: EPA Fund-Financed
Operable Unit: SITEWIDE
Priority Level: Not reported
Date Completed: 11/01/83
Date Started: / /
Action: DISCOVERY
Action Code: 001
CERCLIS Assessment History:
the South Bay Asbestos Area Site was completed in September 2011.

Claire Landfill does not need a deed restriction. An ESD addressing OU2 of results are sufficient to demonstrate to EPA and DTSC that the former Sainte determining that no such deed restriction is required. Asbestos sampling ROD-required deed restriction placed on its title, but through this ESD EPA is requirements in the ROD. The Sainte Claire Landfill has not had the Landfill and that existing state requirements meet the deed restriction be used to clarify that no further controls are needed at the Marshland SOUTH BAY ASBESTOS AREA (Continued) 1000405018
TC4437954.2s Page 15
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
Action Anomaly: Not reported
Urgency Indicator: Not reported
Planning Status: Primary
Primary Responsibility: Federal Enforcement
Operable Unit: SITEWIDE
Priority Level: Not reported
Date Completed: 11/01/86
Date Started: 08/15/85
Action: NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST RESPONSIBLE PARTY SEARCH Action Code: 001
For detailed financial records, contact EDR for a Site Report.:

Action Anomaly: Not reported
Urgency Indicator: Not reported
Planning Status: Not reported
Primary Responsibility: EPA Fund-Financed
Operable Unit: SITEWIDE
Priority Level: Not reported
Date Completed: 06/10/86
Date Started: / /
Action: FINAL LISTING ON NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST
Action Code: 001
For detailed financial records, contact EDR for a Site Report.:

San Jose City CouncilAugust 9, 2022

San Jose City Council
August 9, 2022