Exhibit D - Initial Study-MND and Appendices — San Jose City Council, August 9, 2022 (part 9 of 10)

Owner State: CA Contact Email:

Owner ZIP Code: 92660 Started On: 8/30/2007
Owner Phone: (408) 467-7532
Site Activities (Search Result)
Waste Disch Req No: Throughput UOM:

Site Regulatory Stat: Pre-regulation Remaining Capacity: 0 Act Opl Status: Closed Remaining Cap Date:

Act Regulatory Stat: Pre-regulations Max Permit Capacity: 0 Activity Category: Disposal Capacity UOM:

Act Classification: Solid Waste Disposal Site Total Acreage: 0 Activity is Archived: No Disposal Acreage: 0
WDR Landfill Class: Permitted Elevation: 0
Cease Operation: 1/1/1988 Permitted Elev Type:

Cease Oper Type: Actual Permitted Depth: 0
Inspection
Frequency:

Quarterly Permitted Depth Type:

Site Name: Route 237 Lincoln Technology Park
Activity: Solid Waste Disposal Site
Max Permitted Throughput: 0
Inert Debris Engineered Fill: No
Extra Details
Enforcement Agency (LEA/EA): San Jose
Site Activities (Export)
WDR No: Remaining Capacity: 0
WDR Landfill Class: Remaining Cap Dt:

Act is Archived: No Max Permit Cap: 0
Act Opl Status: Closed Capacity UOM:

Act Regulatory Stat: Pre-regulations Total Acreage: 0.00 Activity Category: Disposal Disposal Acreage: 0.00
Act Classification: Solid Waste Disposal Site Permitted Elev : 0 Cease Operation: 1/1/1988 Permitted Elev Tp:

Cease Operation Tp: Actual Permitted Depth: 0
Insp Frequency: Quarterly Permitted Depth Tp:

Site Name: Route 237 Lincoln Technology Park
Site Point of Contact: Abel Martinez-Centeno
Activity: Solid Waste Disposal Site
97 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Max Permitted Throughput: 0
Throughput UOM:
m-17-827704411-b 1 of 1 ESE 0.40 /
2,087.53

8.64 /
-3

ROAD CONSTRUCTION
NORTH 1ST STREET & HWY 237
SAN JOSE CA 95113
p1p-827704411-y1y
Global ID: T10000008022 Site Facility Type: CLEANUP PROGRAM SITE Status: OPEN - INACTIVE County: SANTA CLARA
Status Date: 6/16/2016 Latitude: 37.41885
Longitude: -121.95867
Data Source: Cleanup Program Sites from GeoTracker Search; Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Facilities Detail(as Nov 16 2020) RB Case No: 43S0304 CUF Case: NO
Local Case No: Case Worker:

Begin Date: 11/19/2015 File Location: All Files are on GeoTracker or in the Local Agency Database
Stop Method:

Lead Agency: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)
Local Agency:

Potential COC: Lead
Potential Media of Concern: Soil
How Discovered:

How Discovered Description:

Stop Description:

Calwater Watershed Name: Santa Clara - Coyote Creek (205.30) DWR GW Subbasin Name: Santa Clara Valley - Santa Clara (2-009.02) Disadvantaged Community:

Site History:

Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Regulatory Activity(as Nov 16 2020) Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 1993-11-03 00:00:00
Action: Other Report / Document
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 1993-11-01 00:00:00
Action: Correspondence
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 1993-10-01 00:00:00
Action: Other Report / Document
Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Status History(as Nov 16 2020) Status: Open - Inactive
Status Date: 2016-06-16 00:00:00
Status: Open - Case Begin Date
Status Date: 2015-11-19 00:00:00
Status: Open - Inactive
Status Date: 2015-11-19 00:00:00
Cleanup Program Sites from GeoTracker Search - Regulatory Profile (as of Oct 06, 2020) Project Status: WDR Place Type:

CUF Claim: WDR File:

CUF Priority Assign: WDR Order:

CUF Amount Paid: File Location: ALL FILES ARE ON GEOTRACKER OR IN 17 CLEANUP
SITES
98 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB

THE LOCAL AGENCY DATABASE
Facility Type: Composting Method:

User Defined Beneficial Use:

Designated Beneficial Use: MUN, AGR, IND, PROC
Designated Beneficl Use Desc: Municipal and Domestic Supply, Agricultural Supply, Industrial Service Supply, Industrial Process Supply Project Oversight Agencies:

Report Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report?global_id=T10000008022 Cleanup Status Detail: OPEN - INACTIVE AS OF 6/16/2016
Cleanup History Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report_include? global_id=T10000008022&tabname=regulatoryhistory
Potential COC: LEAD
Potential Media of Concern: SOIL
GW Monitoring Freq:

DWR GW Sub Basin: Santa Clara Valley - Santa Clara (2-009.02) Calwater Watershed Name: Santa Clara - Coyote Creek (205.30) Post Closure Site Management:

Future Land Use:

Cleanup Oversight Agencies: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2) (LEAD) - CASE #: 43S0304 Site History:

No site history available
Sites from GeoTracker Search - Regulatory Activities (as of Oct 06, 2020) Action Type: Response Requested - Other
Action Date: 11/3/1993
Received Issue Date: 11/3/1993
Action: Other Report / Document
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T10000008022&doc_id=5891996 Title Description Comments:

Site Description/Characterization
Action Type: Response Requested - Other
Action Date: 11/1/1993
Received Issue Date: 11/1/1993
Action: Correspondence
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T10000008022&doc_id=5891994 Title Description Comments:

Dumping site discovered
Action Type: Response Requested - Other
Action Date: 10/1/1993
Received Issue Date: 10/1/1993
Action: Other Report / Document
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T10000008022&doc_id=5891995 Title Description Comments:

Soil Sampling Plan
Sites from GeoTracker Search - Documents (as of Oct 06, 2020) Document Type: Site Documents Submitted:

Document Date: 11/3/1993 Submitted By: HOLLUND RUDOLPH (REGULATOR) Size :

Title: SITE DESCRIPTION/CHARACTERIZATION - REGULATOR RESPONSE Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T10000008022&document_id=5891996 Type: OTHER REPORT / DOCUMENT
Document Type: Site Documents Submitted:

Document Date: 11/1/1993 Submitted By: HOLLUND RUDOLPH (REGULATOR) Size :

Title: DUMPING SITE DISCOVERED - REGULATOR RESPONSE
99 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T10000008022&document_id=5891994 Type: CORRESPONDENCE
Document Type: Site Documents Submitted:

Document Date: 10/1/1993 Submitted By: HOLLUND RUDOLPH (REGULATOR) Size :

Title: SOIL SAMPLING PLAN - REGULATOR RESPONSE
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T10000008022&document_id=5891995 Type: OTHER REPORT / DOCUMENT
Sites from GeoTracker Search - Cleanup Status History (as of Oct 06, 2020) Status: Open - Inactive
Date : 6/16/2016
Status: Open - Inactive
Date : 11/19/2015
Status: Open - Case Begin Date
Date : 11/19/2015
m-18-859597335-b 1 of 1 ENE 0.42 /
2,239.32

4.37 /
-8
AT&T Mobility - MILPITAS III
(USID13126)
121 NORTECH PKWY
SAN JOSE CA 95134
p1p-859597335-y1y
Siteid: 373196
Latitude: 37.423635
Longitude: -121.959351
Original Source: CHAZ
Record Date: 30-MAY-2017
m-19-859597810-b 1 of 1 E 0.44 /
2,301.43

10.87 /
-1

SILICON QUEST INTERNATIONAL
4425 FORTRAN DR
SAN JOSE CA 95134
p1p-859597810-y1y
Siteid: 153593
Latitude: 37.422127
Longitude: -121.958160
Original Source: CHAZ
Record Date: 30-MAY-2017
m-20-820287862-b 1 of 3 SW 0.44 /
2,315.61

19.37 /
7 SANTA CLARA GATEWAY

GREAT AMERICA WAY &

LAFAYETTE
SANTA CLARA CA 95050
p1p-820287862-y1y
Estor/EPA ID: 43290008 Permit Renewal Lead:

Site Code: 201317 Project Manager: CLAUDE JEMISON
Nat Priority List: NO Supervisor: CHERYL PROWELL
Acres: 40 ACRES Public Partici Spclst:

Special Program: VOLUNTARY CLEANUP PROGRAM Census Tract: 6085505001 Funding: SITE PROPONENT County: SANTA CLARA
Assembly District: 25 Latitude: 37.4164033876626
Senate District: 10 Longitude: -121.974303178873
School District:

APN: 104-01-057, 104-01-095, 104-01-098, 104-01-099, 104-01-101, 104-01-104 Cleanup Status: CERTIFIED / OPERATION & MAINTENANCE AS OF 11/26/2003 Cleanup Oversight Agencies: DTSC - SITE CLEANUP PROGRAM - LEAD AGENCY Site Type: VOLUNTARY CLEANUP
Office: CLEANUP BERKELEY
Past Use that Caused Contam: MANUFACTURED GAS PLANT
Potential Media Affected: SOIL
18 19
20 DELISTED
HAZ

DELISTED
HAZ
VCP
100 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Potential Contamin of Concern:

POLYNUCLEAR AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS (PAHS), TPH-MOTOR OIL, TPH-DIESEL, TPH-GAS Site History:

The site is owned by the City of Santa Clara. The site consists of flat, open fields lying south of Highway 237, north of the closed All Purpose Landfill, and between Great America Parkway and Lafayette Street. Yerba Buena Way cuts it in an eastwest direction. Historically, this site has been marshland.

In the early 1950's, it was developed as a charcoal factory and then a crating facility. Support equipment for the now closed All Purpose landfill was stored on this site and included gasoline and diesel fuel storage.

Status: CERTIFIED / OPERATION & MAINTENANCE - LAND USE RESTRICTIONS Program Type: VOLUNTARY CLEANUP
CalEnviroScreen Score: 46-50%
Summary Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=43290008 Land Use Restrictions
Site Management
Requirements:

ASPHALT COVER NOT TO BE DISTURBED WITHOUT APPROVAL

DAY CARE CENTER PROHIBITED

ELDER CARE CENTER PROHIBITED

HOSPITAL USE PROHIBITED

LAND USE COVENANT

NO EXCAVATION OF CONTAMINATED SOILS WITHOUT AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVAL

NOTIFY AFTER CHANGE OF PROPERTY OWNER

NOTIFY PRIOR TO SUBSURFACE WORK
PUBLIC OR PRIVATE SCHOOL FOR PERSONS UNDER 21 PROHIBITED

REQUIRES SURFACE COVERS

RESIDENCE USE PROHIBITED
Title: Deed Restrictions for Yerba Buena Way
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/view_document? docurl=/public/deliverable_documents/7401288688/Santa%20Clara%20ybw%20DEED%2Epdf Date Recorded: 11/20/2003
Site Management
Requirements:

DAY CARE CENTER PROHIBITED

HOSPITAL USE PROHIBITED
PUBLIC OR PRIVATE SCHOOL FOR PERSONS UNDER 21 PROHIBITED

RESIDENCE USE PROHIBITED
Title: Deed Restriction for the Consolidation Cell
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/view_document? docurl=/public/deliverable_documents/5227231681/Santa%20Clara%20cell%20DEED%2Epdf Date Recorded: 11/20/2003
Future Activities
Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: 5 Year Review Reports
Due Date: 2021
Completed Activities
Title: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Letter
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=60337729 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 9/24/2013
Comments: A letter notifying RP/owner of DTSC oversight cost estimates.

Title: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate letter
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=60302572 101 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 9/4/2012
Comments:

Title: 2008 DTSC Annual Site Inspection and Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=6010868 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/Visit Date Completed: 4/25/2008
Comments: The roadway and cell area are in good condition. However, a section of the fence was damaged.

Title: CEQA
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=5003647 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: CEQA - Initial Study/ Neg. Declaration
Date Completed: 5/30/2001
Comments: Approval of Initial Study and Negative Declaration along with the RAP.

Title: Soil Management Plan
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=60318411 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Soils Management Plan
Date Completed: 12/20/2012
Comments:

Title: 2009 DTSC Cost Estimate
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=6017460 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 10/13/2009
Comments:

Title: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=60287385 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 12/15/2011
Comments:

Title: 2008 RP Annual Inspection Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=6015356 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Operations and Maintenance Report
Date Completed: 2/4/2008
Comments:

Title: RP Annual Cap Inspection and Report
102 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=6010191 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Operations and Maintenance Report
Date Completed: 2/3/2006
Comments:

Title: DTSC Annual LUR Inspection and Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=6017071 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/Visit Date Completed: 5/16/2011
Comments:

Title: Annual Summary Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=60393528 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Operations and Maintenance Report
Date Completed: 2/2/2017
Comments: City of Santa Clara staff performed an inspection of the capped areas of the site on January 30, 2017 and submitted an annual summary report documenting the inspection. No damage to or deterioration of the capped areas were observed and the cap was found to be in satisfactory condition. Based on the annual summary report, DTSC concluded site is in compliance with the Land Use Covenant and the Operation and Maintenance Agreement.

Title: 2007 DTSC Cap Inspection
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=6009160 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/Visit Date Completed: 4/27/2007
Comments: No problems noted during the inspection.

Title: 2006 RP Annual Inspection
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=6014489 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Operations and Maintenance Report
Date Completed: 1/24/2007
Comments: No problems noted.

Title: RP Annual Inspection Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=60263464 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Operations and Maintenance Report
Date Completed: 11/29/2012
Comments: The results of the inspection noted that the consolidated cell cap and the Yerba Buena Way cap surfaces were in very good condition with no visible cracks or deterioration that would allow surface water to penetrate through the cap.

Title: Press Release - Certification
Title Link:

Area Name:

Area Link:
103 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Public Notice
Date Completed: 12/18/2003
Comments: Press Release issued announcing certification of the project.

Title: Annual Summary Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=60393530 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Operations and Maintenance Report
Date Completed: 1/15/2019
Comments:

Title: Five-Year Review Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=6027572 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Title: Deed Restriction for the Consolidation Cell
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=6008641 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Land Use Restriction
Date Completed: 11/20/2003
Comments: Deed Restrictions recorded. The total restricted area is proximately 3/4 of an acre.

Title: Public Notice for 5-Year Review Completion
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=6020962 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Public Notice
Date Completed: 5/27/2010
Comments:

Title: 2009 DTSC Annual Site Inspection and Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=6012689 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/Visit Date Completed: 7/16/2009
Comments: The Yerba Buena Way roadway was observed to be in good condition and well maintained, with no evidence of pavement disturbance. Additionally, the containment cell was well-vegetated and there was no ponded water, erosion, spalling or large cracks or holes observed. There was no evidence of any activities or conditions prohibited by the Deed Restriction in either the containment cell area or on Yerba Buena Way.

Title: Proposed Impacted Soil Removal Notice/Soil Management Plan Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=60346746 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Soils Management Plan
Date Completed: 12/31/2013
Comments: Notification was provided to DTSC that soil is to be removed from an approximately 25-feet long by 60-feet wide 104 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
area at the western end of the consolidation cell where polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-impacted soil was placed in September 2001. DTSC approved the work proceeding and approved the Soil Management Plan and Health and Safety Plan that were submitted with the notification.

Title: 5 Year Review Reports
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=5003643 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: 5 Year Review Reports
Date Completed: 1/21/2010
Comments: The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has reviewed the Five-Year Review Yerba Buena Way. The Five Year Review is hereby approved.

Title: RP Annual Inspection Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=60263463 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Operations and Maintenance Report
Date Completed: 4/13/2012
Comments: The City of Santa Clara submitted its Annual Summary Report for 2011 that documents the results of a visual inspection of the consolidation cell cap surface. DTSC approved the Report and recommended that a checklist be included in next year's inspection report.

Title: RP Annual Inspection Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=60263465 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Operations and Maintenance Report
Date Completed: 3/11/2014
Comments: The City of Santa Clara performed a cap inspection on February 18, 2014 in accordance with the Operations and Maintenance Plan. The inspection noted that, with the exception of the west end, the consolidation cell cap is in very good condition with few visible cracks or deterioration that would allow surface to penetrate through the cap.

The west end of the consolidation cell is being reconstructed to be within the property boundaries. The Yerba Buena Way (now Great American Parkway) cap surfaces were in satisfactory condition.

Title: Remedial Action Completion Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=5003650 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Remedial Action Completion Report
Date Completed: 8/5/2003
Comments: RMDL - Remedial Action approved. Approximately 15,636 cubic yards of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)- impacted material was placed in the consolidation cell and capped with a minimum of 2 feet of clean soil, and approximately 16,247 cubic yards of PAHs-impacted material, along with approximately 3,860 cubic yards of petroleum hydrocarbon-impacted soil, was excavated and removed offsite. Yerba Buena Way contained PAHsimpacted material. The Yerba Buena Way and the consolidation cell required deed restrictions and operation and maintenance. An Operation and Maintenance Plan was approved for the Consolidation Cell and Yerba Buena Way.

Title: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Letter
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=60337732 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 10/3/2016
Comments:

Title: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Letter
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=60337734 Area Name:

Area Link:
105 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 9/14/2018
Comments:

Title: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Letter
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=60427235 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 9/19/2017
Comments:

Title: Certification
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=5003649 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Certification
Date Completed: 11/26/2003
Comments: Site Certification as cleaned up.

Title: Remedial Design
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=5003648 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Design/Implementation Workplan
Date Completed: 7/13/2001
Comments:

Title: Annual Summary Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=60393529 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Operations and Maintenance Report
Date Completed: 2/2/2018
Comments:

Title: Annual Summary Reports.

Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=60393527 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Operations and Maintenance Report
Date Completed: 1/29/2016
Comments:

Title: RP Annual Inspection Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=60263462 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Operations and Maintenance Report
Date Completed: 1/28/2011
Comments:

Title: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=60416228 Area Name:
106 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 10/7/2020
Comments: Emailed annual cost estimate letter on 10/7/2020. -EC
Title: 2010 Annual Inspection and Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=6015493 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/Visit Date Completed: 9/30/2010
Comments: The Yerba Buena Way roadway was observed to be in good condition and well maintained, with no evidence of pavement disturbance. Additionally, the containment cell was well-vegetated and there was no ponded water, erosion, spalling or large cracks or holes observed. There was no evidence of any activities or conditions prohibited by the Deed Restriction in either the containment cell area or on Yerba Buena Way.

Title: DTSC Annual Cap Inspection Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=6010939 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Other Report
Date Completed: 4/11/2006
Comments:

Title: Operations and Maintenance Workplan
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=5003645 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Operations and Maintenance Plan
Date Completed: 8/5/2003
Comments: O&M PLAN approved for operation and maintenance activities at both, the Consolidation Cell and Yerba Buena Way.

Title: VCA
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=5003175 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Standard Voluntary Agreement
Date Completed: 5/19/2000
Comments: VCA - Signed Voluntary Cleanup Agreement (VCA) with the City of Santa Clara for the investigation and remediation of PAHs at the site.

Title: Remedial Action Plan
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=5003651 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Remedial Action Plan
Date Completed: 5/30/2001
Comments: RAP - Remedial Action Plan (RAP) approved for the remediation of the Santa Clara Gateway. The RAP required excavation and on-site consolidation and capping of the PAH-contaminated soil and excavation and off-site disposal of petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated soil. The capped area will be deed restricted to prevent uncontrolled access
Title: Public Participation Plan
Title Link:

Area Name:
107 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Public Participation Plan / Community Relations Plan Date Completed: 3/1/2001
Comments: Final Public participation plan
Title: Operation and Maintenance Agreement
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=5003644 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Operation & Maintenance Order/Agreement
Date Completed: 11/10/2003
Comments: OMA - Operation and Maintenance Agreement approved, which requires operation and maintenance of the Consolidation Cell and Yerba Buena Way.

Title: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Letter
Title Link:

Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 10/16/2014
Comments:

Title: Remedial Investigation / Feasibility Study
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=5003174 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Remedial Investigation / Feasibility Study Date Completed: 4/17/2001
Comments: RIFS - Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study approved. Investigations identified buried layers of black material, apparently derived from prior charcoal manufacturing activities. Samples of this material indicate the presence of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Petroleum hydrocarbon-impacted soil was encountered underneath and surrounding a maintenance building and the existing garage. Groundwater samples have shown contamination.

Title: Public Notice for Draft Remedial Action Plan
Title Link:

Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Public Notice
Date Completed: 4/16/2001
Comments: Copy of the Public Notice announcing the start of the public comment period for the draft RAP.

Title: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Letter
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=60337731 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 10/15/2015
Comments:

Title: Deed Restrictions for Yerba Buena Way
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=6008642 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Land Use Restriction
Date Completed: 11/20/2003
108 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Comments: Deed Restrictions recorded. The total restricted area is proximately 3.5 acres.

Title: Fact Sheet - Draft Remedial Action Plan
Title Link:

Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Fact Sheets
Date Completed: 4/17/2001
Comments: Fact Sheet issued announcing the start of the public comment period for the draft RAP.

Title: Soil Management Plan Great America Way (Formallly Yerba Buena Way) Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=60361188 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Soils Management Plan
Date Completed: 5/28/2014
Comments:

Title: Impacted Soil Removal Completion Report - Santa Clara Gateway Parcel 3 and Parcel 3 Remainder Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=60383372 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Other Report
Date Completed: 3/2/2015
Comments: The report presents a summary of the removal of 1,557 tons of impacted soil from a portion of a consolidation cell that was inadvertently constructed on Parcel 3 (most of the consolidation cell is situated on Parcel 3 Remainder).

The excavated soil was disposed at a permitted Class II landfill. m-20-820321921-b 2 of 3 SW 0.44 /
2,315.61

19.37 /
7 SANTA CLARA GATEWAY

GREAT AMERICA WAY &

LAFAYETTE
SANTA CLARA CA 95050
p1p-820321921-y1y
Estor/EPA ID: 43290008 Permit Renewal Lead:

Site Code: 201317 Project Manager: CLAUDE JEMISON
Nat Priority List: NO Supervisor: CHERYL PROWELL
Acres: 40 ACRES Public Partici Spclst:

POLYNUCLEAR AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS (PAHS), TPH-MOTOR OIL, TPH-DIESEL, TPH-GAS Site History:

Status: CERTIFIED / OPERATION & MAINTENANCE - LAND USE RESTRICTIONS Program Type: VOLUNTARY CLEANUP
20 LUR
109 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
CalEnviroScreen Score: 46-50%
Summary Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=43290008 Land Use Restrictions
Site Management
Requirements:

ASPHALT COVER NOT TO BE DISTURBED WITHOUT APPROVAL

DAY CARE CENTER PROHIBITED

ELDER CARE CENTER PROHIBITED

HOSPITAL USE PROHIBITED

LAND USE COVENANT

NO EXCAVATION OF CONTAMINATED SOILS WITHOUT AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVAL

NOTIFY AFTER CHANGE OF PROPERTY OWNER

NOTIFY PRIOR TO SUBSURFACE WORK
PUBLIC OR PRIVATE SCHOOL FOR PERSONS UNDER 21 PROHIBITED

REQUIRES SURFACE COVERS

DAY CARE CENTER PROHIBITED

HOSPITAL USE PROHIBITED
PUBLIC OR PRIVATE SCHOOL FOR PERSONS UNDER 21 PROHIBITED

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: 5 Year Review Reports
Due Date: 2021
Completed Activities
Title: Five-Year Review Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=6027572 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Title: 2008 DTSC Annual Site Inspection and Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=6010868 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/Visit Date Completed: 4/25/2008
Comments: The roadway and cell area are in good condition. However, a section of the fence was damaged.

Title: 2008 RP Annual Inspection Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=6015356 Area Name:

Area Link:
110 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Operations and Maintenance Report
Date Completed: 2/4/2008
Comments:

Title: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Letter
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=60337729 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 9/24/2013
Comments: A letter notifying RP/owner of DTSC oversight cost estimates.

Title: Soil Management Plan Great America Way (Formallly Yerba Buena Way) Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=60361188 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Soils Management Plan
Date Completed: 5/28/2014
Comments:

Title: RP Annual Inspection Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=60263462 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Operations and Maintenance Report
Date Completed: 1/28/2011
Comments:

Title: Annual Summary Reports.

Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=60393527 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Operations and Maintenance Report
Date Completed: 1/29/2016
Comments:

Title: Press Release - Certification
Title Link:

Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Public Notice
Date Completed: 12/18/2003
Comments: Press Release issued announcing certification of the project.

Title: DTSC Annual Cap Inspection Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=6010939 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Other Report
Date Completed: 4/11/2006
Comments:

Title: 5 Year Review Reports
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=5003643 Area Name:
111 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Title: 2007 DTSC Cap Inspection
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=6009160 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/Visit Date Completed: 4/27/2007
Comments: No problems noted during the inspection.

Title: Fact Sheet - Draft Remedial Action Plan
Title Link:

Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Fact Sheets
Date Completed: 4/17/2001
Comments: Fact Sheet issued announcing the start of the public comment period for the draft RAP.

Title: Remedial Action Plan
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=5003651 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Land Use Restriction
Date Completed: 11/20/2003
Comments: Deed Restrictions recorded. The total restricted area is proximately 3.5 acres.

Title: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=60416228 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 10/7/2020
Comments: Emailed annual cost estimate letter on 10/7/2020. -EC
Title: Remedial Action Completion Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=5003650 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Remedial Action Completion Report
112 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Date Completed: 8/5/2003
Comments: RMDL - Remedial Action approved. Approximately 15,636 cubic yards of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)- impacted material was placed in the consolidation cell and capped with a minimum of 2 feet of clean soil, and approximately 16,247 cubic yards of PAHs-impacted material, along with approximately 3,860 cubic yards of petroleum hydrocarbon-impacted soil, was excavated and removed offsite. Yerba Buena Way contained PAHsimpacted material. The Yerba Buena Way and the consolidation cell required deed restrictions and operation and maintenance. An Operation and Maintenance Plan was approved for the Consolidation Cell and Yerba Buena Way.

Title: Public Notice for 5-Year Review Completion
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=6020962 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Public Notice
Date Completed: 5/27/2010
Comments:

Title: 2010 Annual Inspection and Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=6015493 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Title: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Letter
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=60337731 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 10/15/2015
Comments:

Title: Annual Summary Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=60393529 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Operations and Maintenance Report
Date Completed: 2/2/2018
Comments:

Title: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Letter
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=60337732 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 10/3/2016
Comments:

Title: Public Notice for Draft Remedial Action Plan
Title Link:

Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Public Notice
Date Completed: 4/16/2001
113 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Comments: Copy of the Public Notice announcing the start of the public comment period for the draft RAP.

Title: RP Annual Inspection Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=60263464 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Title: VCA
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=5003175 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Title: Annual Summary Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=60393530 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Operations and Maintenance Report
Date Completed: 1/15/2019
Comments:

Title: Public Participation Plan
Title Link:

Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Title: Proposed Impacted Soil Removal Notice/Soil Management Plan Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=60346746 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Soils Management Plan
Date Completed: 12/31/2013
Comments: Notification was provided to DTSC that soil is to be removed from an approximately 25-feet long by 60-feet wide area at the western end of the consolidation cell where polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-impacted soil was placed in September 2001. DTSC approved the work proceeding and approved the Soil Management Plan and Health and Safety Plan that were submitted with the notification.
114 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Title: Impacted Soil Removal Completion Report - Santa Clara Gateway Parcel 3 and Parcel 3 Remainder Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=60383372 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

The excavated soil was disposed at a permitted Class II landfill.

Title: CEQA
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=5003647 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: CEQA - Initial Study/ Neg. Declaration
Date Completed: 5/30/2001
Comments: Approval of Initial Study and Negative Declaration along with the RAP.

Title: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=60287385 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 12/15/2011
Comments:

Title: Annual Summary Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=60393528 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Title: DTSC Annual LUR Inspection and Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=6017071 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/Visit Date Completed: 5/16/2011
Comments:

Title: 2006 RP Annual Inspection
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=6014489 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Operations and Maintenance Report
Date Completed: 1/24/2007
Comments: No problems noted.

Title: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate letter
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=60302572 Area Name:
115 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 9/4/2012
Comments:

Title: Certification
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=5003649 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Certification
Date Completed: 11/26/2003
Comments: Site Certification as cleaned up.

Title: Soil Management Plan
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=60318411 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Soils Management Plan
Date Completed: 12/20/2012
Comments:

Title: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Letter
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=60427235 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 9/19/2017
Comments:

Title: Remedial Investigation / Feasibility Study
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=5003174 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Title: 2009 DTSC Cost Estimate
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=6017460 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 10/13/2009
Comments:

Title: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Letter
Title Link:

Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 10/16/2014
Comments:
116 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Title: Remedial Design
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=5003648 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Design/Implementation Workplan
Date Completed: 7/13/2001
Comments:

Title: RP Annual Inspection Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=60263465 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

The west end of the consolidation cell is being reconstructed to be within the property boundaries. The Yerba Buena Way (now Great American Parkway) cap surfaces were in satisfactory condition.

Title: RP Annual Cap Inspection and Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=6010191 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Operations and Maintenance Report
Date Completed: 2/3/2006
Comments:

Title: RP Annual Inspection Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=60263463 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Title: 2009 DTSC Annual Site Inspection and Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=6012689 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Title: Deed Restriction for the Consolidation Cell
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=6008641 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Land Use Restriction
Date Completed: 11/20/2003
Comments: Deed Restrictions recorded. The total restricted area is proximately 3/4 of an acre. 117 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Title: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Letter
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=60337734 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 9/14/2018
Comments:

Title: Operations and Maintenance Workplan
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=5003645 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Operations and Maintenance Plan
Date Completed: 8/5/2003
Comments: O&M PLAN approved for operation and maintenance activities at both, the Consolidation Cell and Yerba Buena Way.
m-20-866001928-b 3 of 3 SW 0.44 /
2,315.61

19.37 /
7 SANTA CLARA GATEWAY

GREAT AMERICA WAY &

LAFAYETTE
SANTA CLARA CA 95050
p1p-866001928-y1y
Estor/EPA ID: 43290008 Assembly District: 25
Site Code: 201317 Senate District: 10
Nat Priority List: NO Permit Renewal Lead:

APN: 104-01-057, 104-01-095, 104-01-098, 104-01-
099, 104-01-101, 104-01-104
Public Partici Spclst:

Census Tract: 6085505001 Project Manager: CLAUDE JEMISON Site Type: VOLUNTARY CLEANUP County: SANTA CLARA
Address Description: GREAT AMERICA WAY & LAFAYETTE Latitude: 37.4164033876626 Office: CLEANUP BERKELEY Longitude: -121.974303178873
Special Program: VOLUNTARY CLEANUP PROGRAM Acres: 40 ACRES Funding: SITE PROPONENT Supervisor: CHERYL PROWELL
Cleanup Status: CERTIFIED / OPERATION & MAINTENANCE AS OF 11/26/2003 Cleanup Oversight Agencies: DTSC - SITE CLEANUP PROGRAM - LEAD AGENCY School District:

Past Use that Caused Contam: MANUFACTURED GAS PLANT
Potential Media Affected: SOIL
Potential Contamin of Concern:

POLYNUCLEAR AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS (PAHS), TPH-MOTOR OIL, TPH-DIESEL, TPH-GAS Site History:

Status: CERTIFIED / OPERATION & MAINTENANCE - LAND USE RESTRICTIONS A2 Program Type: VOLUNTARY CLEANUP
CalEnviroScreen Score: 46-50%
Summary Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=43290008 Land Use Restrictions
Site Management
Requirements:

ASPHALT COVER NOT TO BE DISTURBED WITHOUT APPROVAL

DAY CARE CENTER PROHIBITED

ELDER CARE CENTER PROHIBITED

HOSPITAL USE PROHIBITED

LAND USE COVENANT

NO EXCAVATION OF CONTAMINATED SOILS WITHOUT AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVAL 20 ENVIROSTOR
118 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB

NOTIFY AFTER CHANGE OF PROPERTY OWNER

NOTIFY PRIOR TO SUBSURFACE WORK
PUBLIC OR PRIVATE SCHOOL FOR PERSONS UNDER 21 PROHIBITED

REQUIRES SURFACE COVERS

DAY CARE CENTER PROHIBITED

HOSPITAL USE PROHIBITED
PUBLIC OR PRIVATE SCHOOL FOR PERSONS UNDER 21 PROHIBITED

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 10/3/2016
Comments:

Title: Annual Summary Reports.

Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=60393527 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Operations and Maintenance Report
Date Completed: 1/29/2016
Comments:

Title: RP Annual Inspection Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=60263462 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Operations and Maintenance Report
Date Completed: 1/28/2011
Comments:

Title: 2009 DTSC Cost Estimate
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=6017460 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
119 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Date Completed: 10/13/2009
Comments:

Title: DTSC Annual Cap Inspection Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=6010939 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Other Report
Date Completed: 4/11/2006
Comments:

Title: Deed Restriction for the Consolidation Cell
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=6008641 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Land Use Restriction
Date Completed: 11/20/2003
Comments: Deed Restrictions recorded. The total restricted area is proximately 3/4 of an acre.

Title: Remedial Design
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=5003648 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Design/Implementation Workplan
Date Completed: 7/13/2001
Comments:

Title: Remedial Action Plan
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=5003651 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Public Notice
Date Completed: 4/16/2001
Comments: Copy of the Public Notice announcing the start of the public comment period for the draft RAP.

Title: VCA
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=5003175 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Title: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Letter
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=60337729 120 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 9/24/2013
Comments: A letter notifying RP/owner of DTSC oversight cost estimates.

Title: Operations and Maintenance Workplan
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=5003645 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Operations and Maintenance Plan
Date Completed: 8/5/2003
Comments: O&M PLAN approved for operation and maintenance activities at both, the Consolidation Cell and Yerba Buena Way.

Title: Remedial Investigation / Feasibility Study
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=5003174 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Title: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=60416228 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 10/7/2020
Comments: Emailed annual cost estimate letter on 10/7/2020. -EC
Title: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Letter
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=60427235 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 9/19/2017
Comments:

Title: RP Annual Inspection Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=60263465 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

The west end of the consolidation cell is being reconstructed to be within the property boundaries. The Yerba Buena Way (now Great American Parkway) cap surfaces were in satisfactory condition.

Title: RP Annual Inspection Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=60263464 121 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Title: Deed Restrictions for Yerba Buena Way
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=6008642 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Land Use Restriction
Date Completed: 11/20/2003
Comments: Deed Restrictions recorded. The total restricted area is proximately 3.5 acres.

Title: CEQA
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=5003647 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: CEQA - Initial Study/ Neg. Declaration
Date Completed: 5/30/2001
Comments: Approval of Initial Study and Negative Declaration along with the RAP.

Title: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Letter
Title Link:

Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 10/16/2014
Comments:

Title: Soil Management Plan Great America Way (Formallly Yerba Buena Way) Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=60361188 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Soils Management Plan
Date Completed: 5/28/2014
Comments:

Title: Public Notice for 5-Year Review Completion
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=6020962 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Public Notice
Date Completed: 5/27/2010
Comments:

Title: 2008 DTSC Annual Site Inspection and Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=6010868 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/Visit Date Completed: 4/25/2008
Comments: The roadway and cell area are in good condition. However, a section of the fence was damaged. 122 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Title: Fact Sheet - Draft Remedial Action Plan
Title Link:

Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Fact Sheets
Date Completed: 4/17/2001
Comments: Fact Sheet issued announcing the start of the public comment period for the draft RAP.

Title: 2006 RP Annual Inspection
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=6014489 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Operations and Maintenance Report
Date Completed: 1/24/2007
Comments: No problems noted.

Title: Public Participation Plan
Title Link:

Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Public Participation Plan / Community Relations Plan Date Completed: 3/1/2001
Comments: Final Public participation plan
Title: Annual Summary Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=60393530 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Operations and Maintenance Report
Date Completed: 1/15/2019
Comments:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

The excavated soil was disposed at a permitted Class II landfill.

Title: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate letter
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=60302572 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 9/4/2012
Comments:

Title: 2010 Annual Inspection and Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=6015493 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:
123 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Document Type: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/Visit Date Completed: 9/30/2010
Comments: The Yerba Buena Way roadway was observed to be in good condition and well maintained, with no evidence of pavement disturbance. Additionally, the containment cell was well-vegetated and there was no ponded water, erosion, spalling or large cracks or holes observed. There was no evidence of any activities or conditions prohibited by the Deed Restriction in either the containment cell area or on Yerba Buena Way.

Title: 5 Year Review Reports
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=5003643 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Title: Annual Summary Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=60393529 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Operations and Maintenance Report
Date Completed: 2/2/2018
Comments:

Title: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Letter
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=60337731 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 10/15/2015
Comments:

Title: Proposed Impacted Soil Removal Notice/Soil Management Plan Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=60346746 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Title: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=60287385 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 12/15/2011
Comments:

Title: 2009 DTSC Annual Site Inspection and Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=6012689 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/Visit Date Completed: 7/16/2009
124 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Comments: The Yerba Buena Way roadway was observed to be in good condition and well maintained, with no evidence of pavement disturbance. Additionally, the containment cell was well-vegetated and there was no ponded water, erosion, spalling or large cracks or holes observed. There was no evidence of any activities or conditions prohibited by the Deed Restriction in either the containment cell area or on Yerba Buena Way.

Title: 2008 RP Annual Inspection Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=6015356 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Operations and Maintenance Report
Date Completed: 2/4/2008
Comments:

Title: Press Release - Certification
Title Link:

Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Public Notice
Date Completed: 12/18/2003
Comments: Press Release issued announcing certification of the project.

Title: RP Annual Inspection Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=60263463 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Title: DTSC Annual LUR Inspection and Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=6017071 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/Visit Date Completed: 5/16/2011
Comments:

Title: 2007 DTSC Cap Inspection
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=6009160 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/Visit Date Completed: 4/27/2007
Comments: No problems noted during the inspection.

Title: RP Annual Cap Inspection and Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=6010191 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Operations and Maintenance Report
Date Completed: 2/3/2006
Comments:

Title: Certification
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=5003649 125 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Certification
Date Completed: 11/26/2003
Comments: Site Certification as cleaned up.

Title: Operation and Maintenance Agreement
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=5003644 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Title: Remedial Action Completion Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=5003650 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Title: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Letter
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&enforcement_id=60337734 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 9/14/2018
Comments:

Title: Annual Summary Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=60393528 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Title: Five-Year Review Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=6027572 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: 5 Year Review Reports
Date Completed: 2/18/2015
Comments: DTSC concurred with the conclusion of the Five-Year Review that the selected remedial action remains protective of human health and the environment.
126 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Title: Soil Management Plan
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43290008&doc_id=60318411 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Soils Management Plan
Date Completed: 12/20/2012
Comments:
m-21-866871009-b 1 of 2 WNW 0.44 /
2,332.56

5.38 /
-7
FAMILY HEALTH FOUND. OF
ALVISO, MED. CLI
1621 GOLD STREET
SAN JOSE-ALVISO CA 95002
p1p-866871009-y1y
Estor/EPA ID: 43800003 Assembly District: 25
Site Code: Senate District: 10
Nat Priority List: NO Permit Renewal Lead:

APN: NONE SPECIFIED Public Partici Spclst:

Census Tract: 6085504602 Project Manager:

Site Type: CALMORTGAGE County: SANTA CLARA
Address Description: 1621 GOLD STREET Latitude: 37.4247990595004 Office: CLEANUP SACRAMENTO Longitude: -121.975341009375 Special Program: Acres: 0 ACRES
Funding: CALMORTGAGE Supervisor: WILLIAM BECKMAN
Cleanup Status: NO ACTION REQUIRED AS OF 6/27/1994
Cleanup Oversight Agencies: DTSC - SITE CLEANUP PROGRAM - LEAD AGENCY School District:

Past Use that Caused Contam: NONE
Potential Media Affected: NO MEDIA AFFECTED
Potential Contamin of Concern:

NO CONTAMINANTS FOUND
Site History:

DTSC performed an environmental assessment for the Office of Statewide Planning and Development, Cal-Mortgage Loan Insurance Division a sister agency as a part of the real estate due diligence process under a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for the guaranteed loan insurance program for the construction, improvement, and expansion of various health care facilities.

Status: NO ACTION REQUIRED
A2 Program Type: CALMORTGAGE
CalEnviroScreen Score: 81-85%
Summary Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=43800003 Completed Activities
Title: Phase 1
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43800003&doc_id=5002407 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Phase 1
Date Completed: 6/27/1994
Comments: Pursuant to the MOU, DTSC has reviewed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and other documents for the Family Health Foundation of Alviso, Inc., Alviso Medical Clinic (FHFA). The subject property is an existing community health clinic which is owned and operated by FHFA. No change in use is being proposed. A Supplemental Phase I Environmental Assessment Report was prepared by DTSC and concluded that no action was needed for this property; there is no contamination on the property. m-21-891194048-b 2 of 2 WNW 0.44 /
2,332.56

5.38 /
-7
FAMILY HEALTH FOUND. OF
ALVISO, MED. CLI
1621 GOLD STREET
SAN JOSE-ALVISO CA 95002
p1p-891194048-y1y
21 21

ENVIROSTOR

CALSITES
127 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
ID No: 43800003 Assembly:

Status Date: 06/27/1994 Senate:

NPL: Region: 2
Tier: Region Name: BERKELEY
Fund: County Co: 43
Access : Facility County: SANTA CLARA
Access Code: NOT REPORTED Lat Deg: 0
Cortese: Lat Min: 0
Hrscore: Lat Sec: 0
Hrsdate: Lat Dir:

Groundwater Contam: Long Deg: 0
GW Code: NOT REPORTED Long Min: 0
No Sources: 0 Long Sec: 0
RWQCB Name: SAN FRANCISCO BAY Long Dir:

Branch Name: CALMORTGAGE Llmethod:

Staff: SKARINEN Lldesc:

Senior: BCOLER
Status Name: NO ACTION - FOR CALMORTGAGE ONLY
Type Name: CALMORTGAGE ONLY
Lead Name: DEPT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL
SIC Name: HEALTH SERVICES
Filename:

Comments:

Pursuant to the MOU, DTSC has reviewed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and other documents for the Family Health Foundation of Alviso, Inc., Alviso Medical Clinic (FHFA). The subject property is an existing community health clinic which is owned and operated by FHFA. No change in use is being proposed. A Supplemental Phase I Environmental Assessment Report was prepared by DTSC and concluded that no action was needed for this property; there is no contamination on the property.

Background:
m-22-810467082-b 1 of 7 NW 0.45 /
2,366.83

2.11 /
-10

ALVISO INDEPENDENT OIL
5002 ARCHER ST
ALVISO CA 95002
p1p-810467082-y1y
EPA Handler ID: CAL000161743
Gen Status Universe: Large Quantity Generator
Contact Name: KIRK D HAYWARD
Contact Address: P.O. BOX 2407 , , UNION CITY , CA, 94587 , US Contact Phone No and Ext: 510-476-1740
Contact Email: [email protected]
Contact Country: US
Land Type: Private
County Name: SANTA CLARA
EPA Region: 09
Receive Date: 20100701
Location Latitude: 37.428096
Location Longitude: -121.972543
Violation/Evaluation Summary
Note: VIOLATION or UNDETERMINED: There are VIOLATION or UNDETERMINED details or records associated with this facility (EPA ID) in the Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement table dated Jan, 2021.

Violation Details
Citation:

Violation Short Description: Transporters - General
Violation Type: 263.A
Violation Determined Date: 20061026
Scheduled Compliance Date:

Return to Compliance: Documented
Actual Return to Compl: 20061103
Violation Responsible Agency: State
22 RCRA TSD
128 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Enforcement Details
Enforcement Type: 112
Enforcement Type Description:

Enforcement Action Date: 20061103
Enf Disposition Status:

Disposition Status Date:

Enforcement Lead Agency: State
Proposed Penalty Amount:

Final Amount:

Paid Amount:

Enforcement Type: 720
Enforcement Type Description: CRIMINAL INDICTMENT
Enforcement Action Date: 20070517
Enf Disposition Status:

Disposition Status Date:

Enforcement Lead Agency: State
Proposed Penalty Amount:

Final Amount:

Paid Amount:

Violation Details
Citation:

Violation Short Description: TSD - General
Violation Type: 264.A
Violation Determined Date: 20061026
Scheduled Compliance Date:

Return to Compliance: Documented
Actual Return to Compl: 20061103
Violation Responsible Agency: State
Enforcement Details
Enforcement Type: 112
Enforcement Type Description:

Enforcement Action Date: 20061103
Enf Disposition Status:

Disposition Status Date:

Enforcement Lead Agency: State
Proposed Penalty Amount:

Final Amount:

Paid Amount:

Enforcement Type: 720
Enforcement Type Description: CRIMINAL INDICTMENT
Enforcement Action Date: 20070517
Enf Disposition Status:

Disposition Status Date:

Enforcement Lead Agency: State
Proposed Penalty Amount:

Final Amount:

Paid Amount:

Violation Details
Citation:

Violation Short Description: Permits - Application
Violation Type: 270.B
Violation Determined Date: 20061026
Scheduled Compliance Date:

Return to Compliance: Documented
129 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Actual Return to Compl: 20061103
Violation Responsible Agency: State
Enforcement Details
Enforcement Type: 720
Enforcement Type Description: CRIMINAL INDICTMENT
Enforcement Action Date: 20070517
Enf Disposition Status:

Disposition Status Date:

Enforcement Lead Agency: State
Proposed Penalty Amount:

Final Amount:

Paid Amount:

Enforcement Type: 112
Enforcement Type Description:

Enforcement Action Date: 20061103
Enf Disposition Status:

Disposition Status Date:

Enforcement Lead Agency: State
Proposed Penalty Amount:

Final Amount:

Paid Amount:

Violation Details
Citation:

Violation Short Description: TSD - Financial Requirements Violation Type: 264.H
Violation Determined Date: 20021205
Scheduled Compliance Date:

Return to Compliance: Documented
Actual Return to Compl: 20031016
Violation Responsible Agency: State
Enforcement Details
Enforcement Type: 385
Enforcement Type Description: SINGLE SITE CA/FO
Enforcement Action Date: 20040701
Enf Disposition Status:

Disposition Status Date:

Enforcement Lead Agency: State
Proposed Penalty Amount:

Final Amount: 50000
Paid Amount:

Enforcement Type: 112
Enforcement Type Description:

Enforcement Action Date: 20030108
Enf Disposition Status:

Disposition Status Date:

Enforcement Lead Agency: State
Proposed Penalty Amount:

Final Amount:

Paid Amount:

Violation Details
Citation:

Violation Short Description: TSD - General Facility Standards Violation Type: 264.B
Violation Determined Date: 20021119
130 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Scheduled Compliance Date:

Return to Compliance: Documented
Actual Return to Compl: 20030121
Violation Responsible Agency: State
Enforcement Details
Enforcement Type: 112
Enforcement Type Description:

Enforcement Action Date: 20021126
Enf Disposition Status:

Disposition Status Date:

Enforcement Lead Agency: State
Proposed Penalty Amount:

Final Amount:

Paid Amount:

Enforcement Type: 385
Enforcement Type Description: SINGLE SITE CA/FO
Enforcement Action Date: 20040701
Enf Disposition Status:

Disposition Status Date:

Enforcement Lead Agency: State
Proposed Penalty Amount:

Final Amount: 50000
Paid Amount:

Violation Details
Citation:

Violation Short Description: TSD - Financial Requirements Violation Type: 264.H
Violation Determined Date: 20021119
Scheduled Compliance Date:

Return to Compliance: Documented
Actual Return to Compl: 20040701
Violation Responsible Agency: State
Enforcement Details
Enforcement Type: 385
Enforcement Type Description: SINGLE SITE CA/FO
Enforcement Action Date: 20040701
Enf Disposition Status:

Disposition Status Date:

Enforcement Lead Agency: State
Proposed Penalty Amount:

Final Amount: 50000
Paid Amount:

Enforcement Type: 112
Enforcement Type Description:

Enforcement Action Date: 20021126
Enf Disposition Status:

Disposition Status Date:

Enforcement Lead Agency: State
Proposed Penalty Amount:

Final Amount:

Paid Amount:

Violation Details
Citation:

Violation Short Description: TSD - Financial Requirements 131 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Violation Type: 264.H
Violation Determined Date: 20021119
Scheduled Compliance Date:

Return to Compliance: Documented
Actual Return to Compl: 20030121
Violation Responsible Agency: State
Enforcement Details
Enforcement Type: 385
Enforcement Type Description: SINGLE SITE CA/FO
Enforcement Action Date: 20040701
Enf Disposition Status:

Disposition Status Date:

Enforcement Lead Agency: State
Proposed Penalty Amount:

Final Amount: 50000
Paid Amount:

Enforcement Type: 112
Enforcement Type Description:

Enforcement Action Date: 20021126
Enf Disposition Status:

Disposition Status Date:

Enforcement Lead Agency: State
Proposed Penalty Amount:

Final Amount:

Paid Amount:

Violation Details
Citation:

Violation Short Description: Permits - Application
Violation Type: 270.B
Violation Determined Date: 20021119
Scheduled Compliance Date:

Disposition Status Date:

Enforcement Lead Agency: State
Proposed Penalty Amount:

Final Amount: 50000
Paid Amount:

Enforcement Type: 112
Enforcement Type Description:

Enforcement Action Date: 20021126
Enf Disposition Status:

Disposition Status Date:

Enforcement Lead Agency: State
Proposed Penalty Amount:

Final Amount:

Paid Amount:

Violation Details
132 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Citation:

Violation Short Description: TSD - General Facility Standards Violation Type: 264.B
Violation Determined Date: 20010308
Scheduled Compliance Date:

Return to Compliance: Documented
Actual Return to Compl: 20011218
Violation Responsible Agency: State
Enforcement Details
Enforcement Type: 385
Enforcement Type Description: SINGLE SITE CA/FO
Enforcement Action Date: 20011218
Enf Disposition Status:

Disposition Status Date:

Enforcement Lead Agency: State
Proposed Penalty Amount:

Final Amount: 4500
Paid Amount:

Enforcement Type: 112
Enforcement Type Description:

Enforcement Action Date: 20010312
Enf Disposition Status:

Disposition Status Date:

Enforcement Lead Agency: State
Proposed Penalty Amount:

Final Amount:

Paid Amount:

Violation Details
Citation:

Violation Short Description: TSD - Financial Requirements Violation Type: 264.H
Violation Determined Date: 20010308
Scheduled Compliance Date:

Disposition Status Date:

Enforcement Lead Agency: State
Proposed Penalty Amount:

Final Amount: 4500
Paid Amount:

Enforcement Type: 112
Enforcement Type Description:

Enforcement Action Date: 20010312
Enf Disposition Status:

Disposition Status Date:

Enforcement Lead Agency: State
Proposed Penalty Amount:

Final Amount:

Paid Amount:
133 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Violation Details
Citation:

Violation Short Description: TSD - Container Use and Management Violation Type: 264.I
Violation Determined Date: 20010308
Scheduled Compliance Date:

Return to Compliance: Documented
Actual Return to Compl: 20011218
Violation Responsible Agency: State
Enforcement Details
Enforcement Type: 112
Enforcement Type Description:

Enforcement Action Date: 20010312
Enf Disposition Status:

Disposition Status Date:

Enforcement Lead Agency: State
Proposed Penalty Amount:

Final Amount:

Paid Amount:

Violation Details
Citation:

Violation Short Description: TSD - Tank System Standards Violation Type: 264.J
Violation Determined Date: 20010308
Scheduled Compliance Date:

Return to Compliance: Documented
Actual Return to Compl: 20011218
Violation Responsible Agency: State
Enforcement Details
Enforcement Type: 112
Enforcement Type Description:

Enforcement Action Date: 20010312
Enf Disposition Status:

Disposition Status Date:

Enforcement Lead Agency: State
Proposed Penalty Amount:

Final Amount:

Paid Amount:

Violation Details
Citation:

Violation Short Description: TSD - General Facility Standards Violation Type: 264.B
Violation Determined Date: 19990914
Scheduled Compliance Date:

Return to Compliance: Documented
Actual Return to Compl: 19990914
Violation Responsible Agency: State
Enforcement Details
Enforcement Type: 112
Enforcement Type Description:

Enforcement Action Date: 20000920
Enf Disposition Status:
134 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Disposition Status Date:

Enforcement Lead Agency: State
Proposed Penalty Amount:

Final Amount:

Paid Amount:

Violation Details
Citation:

Violation Short Description: TSD - General Facility Standards Violation Type: 264.B
Violation Determined Date: 19990914
Scheduled Compliance Date:

Return to Compliance: Documented
Actual Return to Compl: 20000920
Violation Responsible Agency: State
Enforcement Details
Enforcement Type: 385
Enforcement Type Description: SINGLE SITE CA/FO
Enforcement Action Date: 20000920
Enf Disposition Status:

Disposition Status Date:

Enforcement Lead Agency: State
Proposed Penalty Amount:

Final Amount: 55000
Paid Amount:

Enforcement Type: 112
Enforcement Type Description:

Enforcement Action Date: 20000920
Enf Disposition Status:

Disposition Status Date:

Enforcement Lead Agency: State
Proposed Penalty Amount:

Final Amount:

Paid Amount:

Violation Details
Citation:

Violation Short Description: TSD - Contingency Plan and Emergency Procedures Violation Type: 264.D
Violation Determined Date: 19990914
Scheduled Compliance Date:

Return to Compliance: Documented
Actual Return to Compl: 19990914
Violation Responsible Agency: State
Enforcement Details
Enforcement Type: 112
Enforcement Type Description:

Enforcement Action Date: 20000920
Enf Disposition Status:

Disposition Status Date:

Enforcement Lead Agency: State
Proposed Penalty Amount:

Final Amount:

Paid Amount:

Violation Details
135 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Citation:

Violation Short Description: TSD - Container Use and Management Violation Type: 264.I
Violation Determined Date: 19990914
Scheduled Compliance Date:

Disposition Status Date:

Enforcement Lead Agency: State
Proposed Penalty Amount:

Final Amount: 55000
Paid Amount:

Enforcement Type: 112
Enforcement Type Description:

Enforcement Action Date: 20000920
Enf Disposition Status:

Disposition Status Date:

Enforcement Lead Agency: State
Proposed Penalty Amount:

Final Amount:

Paid Amount:

Violation Details
Citation:

Violation Short Description: TSD - Tank System Standards Violation Type: 264.J
Violation Determined Date: 19990914
Scheduled Compliance Date:

Disposition Status Date:

Enforcement Lead Agency: State
Proposed Penalty Amount:

Final Amount: 55000
Paid Amount:

Enforcement Type: 112
Enforcement Type Description:

Enforcement Action Date: 20000920
Enf Disposition Status:

Disposition Status Date:

Enforcement Lead Agency: State
Proposed Penalty Amount:

Final Amount:

Paid Amount:
136 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Violation Details
Citation:

Violation Short Description: Permits - Application
Violation Type: 270.B
Violation Determined Date: 19990914
Scheduled Compliance Date:

Disposition Status Date:

Enforcement Lead Agency: State
Proposed Penalty Amount:

Final Amount: 55000
Paid Amount:

Enforcement Type: 112
Enforcement Type Description:

Enforcement Action Date: 20000920
Enf Disposition Status:

Disposition Status Date:

Enforcement Lead Agency: State
Proposed Penalty Amount:

Final Amount:

Paid Amount:

Evaluation Details
Evaluation Start Date: 20180618
Evaluation Type Description: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Violation Short Description:

Return to Compliance Date:

Evaluation Agency: State
Evaluation Start Date: 20070416
Evaluation Type Description: FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEW
Violation Short Description:

Return to Compliance Date:

Evaluation Agency: State
Evaluation Start Date: 20061103
Evaluation Type Description: NOT A SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIER Violation Short Description:

Return to Compliance Date:

Evaluation Agency: State
Evaluation Start Date: 20061026
Evaluation Type Description: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Violation Short Description: Permits - Application
Return to Compliance Date: 20061103
Evaluation Agency: State
Evaluation Start Date: 20061026
Evaluation Type Description: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Violation Short Description: Transporters - General
Return to Compliance Date: 20061103
Evaluation Agency: State
Evaluation Start Date: 20061026
137 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Evaluation Type Description: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Violation Short Description: TSD - General
Return to Compliance Date: 20061103
Evaluation Agency: State
Evaluation Start Date: 20061026
Evaluation Type Description: SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIER
Violation Short Description:

Return to Compliance Date:

Evaluation Agency: State
Evaluation Start Date: 20040701
Evaluation Type Description: NOT A SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIER Violation Short Description:

Return to Compliance Date:

Evaluation Agency: State
Evaluation Start Date: 20021205
Evaluation Type Description: FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEW
Violation Short Description: TSD - Financial Requirements Return to Compliance Date: 20031016
Evaluation Agency: State
Evaluation Start Date: 20021119
Evaluation Type Description: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Violation Short Description: Permits - Application
Return to Compliance Date: 20030121
Evaluation Agency: State
Evaluation Start Date: 20021119
Evaluation Type Description: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Violation Short Description: TSD - Financial Requirements Return to Compliance Date: 20030121
Evaluation Agency: State
Evaluation Start Date: 20021119
Evaluation Type Description: SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIER
Violation Short Description:

Return to Compliance Date:

Evaluation Agency: State
Evaluation Start Date: 20021119
Evaluation Type Description: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Violation Short Description: TSD - Financial Requirements Return to Compliance Date: 20040701
Evaluation Agency: State
Evaluation Start Date: 20021119
Evaluation Type Description: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Violation Short Description: TSD - General Facility Standards Return to Compliance Date: 20030121
Evaluation Agency: State
Evaluation Start Date: 20010308
Evaluation Type Description: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Violation Short Description: TSD - Financial Requirements Return to Compliance Date: 20011218
Evaluation Agency: State
Evaluation Start Date: 20010308
Evaluation Type Description: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Violation Short Description: TSD - General Facility Standards Return to Compliance Date: 20011218
Evaluation Agency: State
Evaluation Start Date: 20010308
Evaluation Type Description: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Violation Short Description: TSD - Tank System Standards Return to Compliance Date: 20011218
138 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Evaluation Agency: State
Evaluation Start Date: 20010308
Evaluation Type Description: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Violation Short Description: TSD - Container Use and Management Return to Compliance Date: 20011218
Evaluation Agency: State
Evaluation Start Date: 20000920
Evaluation Type Description: NOT A SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIER Violation Short Description:

Return to Compliance Date:

Evaluation Agency: State
Evaluation Start Date: 19990914
Evaluation Type Description: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Violation Short Description: TSD - General Facility Standards Return to Compliance Date: 20000920
Evaluation Agency: State
Evaluation Start Date: 19990914
Evaluation Type Description: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Violation Short Description: TSD - Container Use and Management Return to Compliance Date: 20000920
Evaluation Agency: State
Evaluation Start Date: 19990914
Evaluation Type Description: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Violation Short Description: TSD - Contingency Plan and Emergency Procedures Return to Compliance Date: 19990914
Evaluation Agency: State
Evaluation Start Date: 19990914
Evaluation Type Description: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Violation Short Description: Permits - Application
Return to Compliance Date: 20000920
Evaluation Agency: State
Evaluation Start Date: 19990914
Evaluation Type Description: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Violation Short Description: TSD - Tank System Standards Return to Compliance Date: 20000920
Evaluation Agency: State
Handler Summary
Importer Activity: No
Mixed Waste Generator: No
Transporter Activity: No
Transfer Facility: No
Onsite Burner Exemption: No
Smelting, Melting and Refining: No
Underground Injection Control: No
Commercial TSD: No
Used Oil Transporter: No
Used Oil Transfer Facility: No
139 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Used Oil Processor: No
Used Oil Refiner: No
Used Oil Burner: No
Used Oil Market Burner: No
Used Oil Spec Marketer: No
Hazardous Waste Handler Details
Sequence No: 1
Receive Date: 20100701
Handler Name: ALVISO INDEPENDENT OIL
Federal Waste Generator Code: 1
Generator Code Description: Large Quantity Generator
Source Type: Annual/Biennial Report update with Notification Waste Code Details
Hazardous Waste Code: 352
Waste Code Description: Other organic solids
Owner/Operator Details
Owner/Operator Ind: Current Operator Street No:

Type: Private Street 1:

Name: CLEARWATER ENVIRONMENTAL

MANAGEMENT
Street 2:

Date Became Current: 19960701 City:

Date Ended Current: State:

Phone: Country:

Source Type: Annual/Biennial Report update with Notification Zip Code:

Owner/Operator Ind: Current Owner Street No:

Type: Private Street 1: P.O. BOX 2407
Name: CLEARWATER ENVIRONMENTAL

MANAGEMENT
Street 2:

Date Became Current: 19960701 City: UNION CITY
Date Ended Current: State: CA
Phone: 510-476-1740 Country: US
Source Type: Annual/Biennial Report update with Notification Zip Code: 94587 m-22-820210011-b 2 of 7 NW 0.45 /
2,366.83

2.11 /
-10

CLEARWATER ENV MGMT DBA

ALVISO INDEPENDENT OIL
5002 ARCHER ST
ALVISO CA 95002
p1p-820210011-y1y
EPA ID: CAL000161743 County: SANTA CLARA
Geotracker Address: 5002 ARCHER ST Geotracker Lat: 37.427823 Geotracker City: ALVISO Geotracker Long: -121.972196
Report URL: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/eerp_profile_report?global_id=3001260 Inspection Information
Inspection Type: Financial Records Review - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Violations: No Violations
Inspection Date: 4/16/2007
Return to Compliance:

Report Sent Date: 5/17/2007
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection - Standardized Permit Violations: Class 1, Class 2
Inspection Date: 11/19/2002
Return to Compliance: 7/1/2004
Report Sent Date: 2/27/2003
22 INSP

COMP ENF
140 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection - Standardized Permit Violations: No Violations
Inspection Date: 6/18/2018
Return to Compliance:

Report Sent Date:

Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Violations: Class 1, Minor
Inspection Date: 10/26/2006
Return to Compliance: 11/3/2006
Report Sent Date: 2/28/2007
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection - Standardized Permit Violations: Class 1, Minor
Inspection Date: 9/14/1999
Return to Compliance: 9/20/2000
Report Sent Date: 10/22/1999
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection - Standardized Permit Violations: Class 2, Minor
Inspection Date: 3/8/2001
Return to Compliance: 12/18/2001
Report Sent Date: 6/11/2001
Inspection Type: Financial Records Review - Standardized Permit Violations: Class 1, Class 2
Inspection Date: 12/5/2002
Return to Compliance: 10/16/2003
Report Sent Date: 1/8/2003
Enforcement Information (ENVIROSTOR ICE Sites Data Download) Enforcement Type: Consent Order with Enforcement and Settlement - Federal CA/FO (385) Enforcement Date: 9/20/2000
Enforcement Type: Consent Order with Enforcement and Settlement - Federal CA/FO (385) Enforcement Date: 7/1/2004
Enforcement Type: Consent Order with Enforcement and Settlement - Federal CA/FO (385) Enforcement Date: 12/18/2001
Permitting
Site Code: 200534 Assembly District: 25
Program Type: HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY Senate District: 10 Facility Type: HIST PERMITTED Census Tract: 6085504602
Calenviro Screen Percentile Sc: 81-85%
Site Facility Type: UNDERGOING CLOSURE - PERMIT AUTHORITY: Standardized Facility History:

QUARTERLY UPDATE
Quarterly Update Period: April, 2020 - June, 2020
The facility is still non-operational and is undergoing closure. Due to operator being unresponsive on closure, Permitting referred, on 11/1/2016, the oversight of the facility closure has been transferred to DTSC's Cleanup program.

FACILITY DESCRIPTION/ HISTORY
Clearwater Environmental Management, doing business as Alviso Independent Oil, operated a hazardous waste storage and transfer facility for wastes from off-site generators. The facility consists of a leased area within a seven (7) acre parcel (APN 015-12-063) at the very end of Archer Street and is offset by 64 feet to the northeast from the end of Archer Street in Alviso, CA. Archer Street officially ends at State Street in San Jose. The facility property is located behind 1341 Archer Street right on the edge of the Alviso Slough. The nearest residences are located on State Street within a quarter mile.

The wastes stored and transferred by Alviso are generated from gas stations, lube change businesses, car dealers and industrial accounts. Occasional pickups include oily wastewater and sludge from used oil tanks, and oily water from spill cleanups. The off-spec petroleum wastes that Alviso receives come from refineries. The wastes were transported from offsite generators to the facility on a "milkrun" modified manifest system where only one 141 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
manifest addresses an entire truckload of wastes. The wastes were stored in containers or tanks.

PERMITTING REGULATORY DESCRIPTION/ HISTORY
The facility had operated at this site since 1976. This facility was known as Alviso Independent Oil from its inception until it was sold to Clearwater Environmental Management in January 1997. Clearwater was granted a Series C Standardized Hazardous Waste Facility Permit, which was effective on December 24, 1997, and expired on December 24, 2007. Prior to the effective date of the Standardized Permit, the facility was authorized under a Standardized Permit Grant of Interim Status issued in 1993.

The Standardized Permit authorized storage in four (4) tanks with a combined capacity of 45,000 gallons, a container storage area with a capacity of two (2) 55-gallon drums, and a proposed container storage area with a capacity of 88 55-gallon drums. Wastes were consolidated and stored in tanks and then transferred to trucks for transportation to treatment or disposal facilities. Clearwater was not authorized to treat or dispose of waste at its facility.

Clearwater did not renew the Standardized Permit prior to its expiration on December 24, 2007, and therefore the facility is not currently in operation.

The site is undergoing closure with oversight by DTSC. DTSC issued an enforcement order to the facility in July of 2013 for failing to submit a closure certification.

DTSC Investigation Compliance Enforcement Sites
Envirostor ID: 3001260 Latitude: 37.427823
Status: No Action Longitude: -121.972196
Site Type: INSPECTION
Site Details from REST Service
Envirostor ID: 3001260 Latitude: 37.427823
Status: No Action Longitude: -121.972196
Site Type: INSPECTION
m-22-820300755-b 3 of 7 NW 0.45 /
2,366.83

2.11 /
-10

CLEARWATER ENV MGMT DBA

ALVISO INDEPENDENT OIL
5002 ARCHER ST
ALVISO CA 950020000
p1p-820300755-y1y
Estor/EPA ID: CAL000161743 Assembly District: 25
Site Code: 200534 Senate District: 10
Nat Priority List: Permit Renewal Lead:

APN: Public Partici Spclst:

Census Tract: Project Manager:

Site Type: UNDERGOING CLOSURE- PERMIT
AUTHORITY: Standardized
County: SANTA CLARA
Address Description: 5002 ARCHER ST Latitude: 37.427823 Office: Longitude: -121.972196
Special Program: Acres:

Funding: Supervisor:

Cleanup Status:

Cleanup Oversight Agencies:

School District:

Past Use that Caused Contam:

Potential Media Affected:

Potential Contamin of Concern:

Site History:

QUARTERLY UPDATE
Quarterly Update Period: July, 2020 - Sept, 2020
The facility is still non-operational and is undergoing closure. Due to operator being unresponsive on closure, Permitting referred, on 11/1/2016, the oversight of the facility closure has been transferred to DTSC's Cleanup program.

The wastes stored and transferred by Alviso are generated from gas stations, lube change businesses, car dealers and industrial accounts. Occasional pickups include oily wastewater and sludge from used oil tanks, and oily water from spill cleanups. The off-spec petroleum wastes that Alviso receives come from refineries. The wastes were transported from offsite generators to the facility on a "milkrun" modified manifest system where only one manifest addresses an entire truckload of wastes. The wastes were stored in containers or tanks.

Clearwater did not renew the Standardized Permit prior to its expiration on December 24, 2007, and therefore the facility is not currently in operation.

The site is undergoing closure with oversight by DTSC. DTSC issued an enforcement order to the facility in July of 2013 for failing to submit a closure certification.

Status: UNDERGOING CLOSURE
A2 Program Type: HAZ WASTE - Standardized
CalEnviroScreen Score: 81-85%
Summary Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/hwmp_profile_report?global_id=CAL000161743 Status: NO ACTION
A2 Program Type: INSPECTION
CalEnviroScreen Score: 81-85%
Summary Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/eerp_profile_report?global_id=3001260 Permit Units - Completed Activities
Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS
Event Description: NEW OPERATING PERMIT - FINAL PERMIT
Date: 12/24/1997
Doc Link: https://www.hwmpenvirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/site_documents/8586850821/Alviso%20Permit%2012%5F24% 5F97%20for%20Envirostor%206%5F27%5F07%2Epdf
Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS
Event Description: NEW OPERATING PERMIT - FINAL PERMIT (EFFECTIVE) Date: 12/24/1997
Doc Link:

Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS
Event Description: NEW OPERATING PERMIT - PUBLIC COMMENT (END) Date: 11/22/1997
Doc Link:

Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS
Event Description: NEW OPERATING PERMIT - FINAL PERMIT (EXPIRES) Date: 12/24/2007
Doc Link:

Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS
Event Description: NEW OPERATING PERMIT - 2ND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY ISSUED Date: 12/9/1996
Doc Link: https://www.hwmpenvirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/site_documents/7209577262/2nd%20NOD%2Epdf Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS
Event Description: NEW OPERATING PERMIT - APPLICATION PART A RECEIVED Date: 3/31/1994
Doc Link: https://www.hwmpenvirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/site_documents/2242520987/1993%2D10%2D26% 20Standardized%20Permit%2Epdf
Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS
Event Description: NEW OPERATING PERMIT - APPLICATION PART B RECEIVED Date: 3/31/1994
Doc Link:
143 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS
Event Description: NEW OPERATING PERMIT - FINAL CEQA
Date: 9/5/1997
Doc Link: https://www.hwmpenvirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/site_documents/3733875870/Initial%20Study%2Epdf Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS
Event Description: NEW OPERATING PERMIT - DRAFT PERMIT
Date: 10/8/1997
Doc Link:

Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS
Event Description: NEW OPERATING PERMIT - PUBLIC COMMENT (BEGIN) Date: 10/8/1997
Doc Link: https://www.hwmpenvirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/site_documents/6144040763/Fact%20Sheet%2Epdf Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS
Event Description: NEW OPERATING PERMIT - 1ST NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY ISSUED Date: 2/28/1996
Doc Link: https://www.hwmpenvirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/site_documents/5491040885/NOD%2Epdf Units Undergoing Closure
Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS
Event Description: REFERRED FOR CLOSURE TO OTHER AGENCY - REFERRED FOR CLOSURE TO OTHER AGENCY Date: 11/1/2016
Doc Link:

Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS
Event Description: CLOSURE - CLOSURE NOTICE RECEIVED
Date: 3/9/2012
Doc Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/hwmp_final_documents? global_id=CAL000161743&link_key=701&document_category=CLOSURE+NOTICE&event_description=Closure+ %2D+CLOSURE+NOTICE+RECEIVED+&mytype=pa
Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS
Event Description: CLOSURE - CLOSURE PLAN RECEIVED
Date: 3/9/2012
Doc Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/hwmp_final_documents? global_id=CAL000161743&link_key=701&document_category=PLAN+RECEIVED&event_description=Closure+% 2D+CLOSURE+PLAN+RECEIVED+&mytype=pa
Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS
Event Description: CLOSURE - CLOSURE PLAN APPROVED
Date: 5/8/2012
Doc Link:
m-22-820356656-b 4 of 7 NW 0.45 /
2,366.83

2.11 /
-10

CLEARWATER ENVIRONMENTAL

MANAGEMENT DBA ALVISO

INDEPENDENT OIL
5002 ARCHER ST
ALVISO CA 950020000
p1p-820356656-y1y
Estor/EPA ID: CAL000048571 Permit Renewal Lead:

Site Code: 200534 Project Manager:

Nat Priority List: Supervisor:

Acres: Public Partici Spclst:

Special Program: Census Tract:

Funding: County: SANTA CLARA
Assembly District: 25 Latitude: 37.427826
Senate District: 10 Longitude: -121.972199
School District:

APN:

Cleanup Status:

Cleanup Oversight Agencies:

Site Type: CLOSED
Office:
22 HWP
144 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Past Use that Caused Contam:

Potential Media Affected:

Potential Contamin of Concern:

Site History:

This Facility is a duplicate of CAL000161743 and therefor being administratively closed due to being a duplicate. All TSDF and status will be kept under Clearwater Env Mgmt DBA Alviso Independent Oil CAL000161743.

Status: CLOSED
Program Type: HAZ WASTE - Standardized
CalEnviroScreen Score: 81-85%
Summary Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/hwmp_profile_report?global_id=CAL000048571 Permit Units - Completed Activities
Unit: NO PERMIT ACTIVITIES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED FOR THIS SITE Event Description:

Date:

Doc Link:

Units Undergoing Closure
Unit: TANK 1
Event Description: CLOSURE ADMINISTRATIVE - ISSUE CLOSURE VERIFICATION Date: 11/15/2016
Doc Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/hwmp_final_documents? global_id=CAL000048571&link_key=1178&document_category=CLOSURE+VERIFICATION&event_description=C losure+Administrative+%2D+ISSUE+CLOSURE+VERIFICATION+&mytype=pa m-22-820356705-b 5 of 7 NW 0.45 /
2,366.83

2.11 /
-10

CLEARWATER ENV MGMT DBA

ALVISO INDEPENDENT OIL
5002 ARCHER ST
ALVISO CA 950020000
p1p-820356705-y1y
Estor/EPA ID: CAL000161743 Permit Renewal Lead:

Site Code: 200534 Project Manager:

Nat Priority List: Supervisor:

Acres: Public Partici Spclst:

Special Program: Census Tract:

Funding: County: SANTA CLARA
Assembly District: 25 Latitude: 37.427823
Senate District: 10 Longitude: -121.972196
School District:

APN:

Cleanup Status:

Cleanup Oversight Agencies:

Site Type: UNDERGOING CLOSURE- PERMIT AUTHORITY: Standardized Office:

Past Use that Caused Contam:

Potential Media Affected:

Potential Contamin of Concern:

Site History:

FACILITY DESCRIPTION/ HISTORY
Clearwater Environmental Management, doing business as Alviso Independent Oil, operated a hazardous waste storage and transfer facility for wastes from off-site generators. The facility consists of a leased area within a seven (7) acre parcel (APN 015-12-063) at the very end of Archer Street and is 22 HWP
145 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
offset by 64 feet to the northeast from the end of Archer Street in Alviso, CA. Archer Street officially ends at State Street in San Jose. The facility property is located behind 1341 Archer Street right on the edge of the Alviso Slough. The nearest residences are located on State Street within a quarter mile.

The wastes stored and transferred by Alviso are generated from gas stations, lube change businesses, car dealers and industrial accounts. Occasional pickups include oily wastewater and sludge from used oil tanks, and oily water from spill cleanups. The off-spec petroleum wastes that Alviso receives come from refineries. The wastes were transported from offsite generators to the facility on a "milkrun" modified manifest system where only one manifest addresses an entire truckload of wastes. The wastes were stored in containers or tanks.

Clearwater did not renew the Standardized Permit prior to its expiration on December 24, 2007, and therefore the facility is not currently in operation.

The site is undergoing closure with oversight by DTSC. DTSC issued an enforcement order to the facility in July of 2013 for failing to submit a closure certification.

Status: UNDERGOING CLOSURE
Program Type: HAZ WASTE - Standardized
CalEnviroScreen Score: 81-85%
Summary Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/hwmp_profile_report?global_id=CAL000161743 Status: NO ACTION
Program Type: INSPECTION
CalEnviroScreen Score: 81-85%
Summary Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/eerp_profile_report?global_id=3001260 Permit Units - Completed Activities
Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS
Event Description: NEW OPERATING PERMIT - FINAL PERMIT (EXPIRES) Date: 12/24/2007
Doc Link:

Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS
Event Description: NEW OPERATING PERMIT - APPLICATION PART B RECEIVED Date: 3/31/1994
Doc Link:

Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS
Event Description: NEW OPERATING PERMIT - PUBLIC COMMENT (BEGIN) Date: 10/8/1997
Doc Link: https://www.hwmpenvirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/site_documents/6144040763/Fact%20Sheet%2Epdf Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS
Event Description: NEW OPERATING PERMIT - 1ST NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY ISSUED Date: 2/28/1996
Doc Link: https://www.hwmpenvirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/site_documents/5491040885/NOD%2Epdf Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS
Event Description: NEW OPERATING PERMIT - PUBLIC COMMENT (END) Date: 11/22/1997
Doc Link:

Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS
Event Description: NEW OPERATING PERMIT - FINAL PERMIT (EFFECTIVE) Date: 12/24/1997
Doc Link:

Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS
Event Description: NEW OPERATING PERMIT - FINAL PERMIT
Date: 12/24/1997
Doc Link: https://www.hwmpenvirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/site_documents/8586850821/Alviso%20Permit%2012%5F24% 146 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
5F97%20for%20Envirostor%206%5F27%5F07%2Epdf
Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS
Event Description: NEW OPERATING PERMIT - APPLICATION PART A RECEIVED Date: 3/31/1994
Doc Link: https://www.hwmpenvirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/site_documents/2242520987/1993%2D10%2D26% 20Standardized%20Permit%2Epdf
Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS
Event Description: NEW OPERATING PERMIT - 2ND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY ISSUED Date: 12/9/1996
Doc Link: https://www.hwmpenvirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/site_documents/7209577262/2nd%20NOD%2Epdf Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS
Event Description: NEW OPERATING PERMIT - DRAFT PERMIT
Date: 10/8/1997
Doc Link:

Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS
Event Description: NEW OPERATING PERMIT - FINAL CEQA
Date: 9/5/1997
Doc Link: https://www.hwmpenvirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/site_documents/3733875870/Initial%20Study%2Epdf Units Undergoing Closure
Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS
Event Description: CLOSURE - CLOSURE PLAN APPROVED
Date: 5/8/2012
Doc Link:

Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS
Event Description: REFERRED FOR CLOSURE TO OTHER AGENCY - REFERRED FOR CLOSURE TO OTHER AGENCY Date: 11/1/2016
Doc Link:

Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS
Event Description: CLOSURE - CLOSURE PLAN RECEIVED
Date: 3/9/2012
Doc Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/hwmp_final_documents? global_id=CAL000161743&link_key=701&document_category=PLAN+RECEIVED&event_description=Closure+% 2D+CLOSURE+PLAN+RECEIVED+&mytype=pa
Unit: MULTIPLE UNITS
Event Description: CLOSURE - CLOSURE NOTICE RECEIVED
Date: 3/9/2012
Doc Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/hwmp_final_documents? global_id=CAL000161743&link_key=701&document_category=CLOSURE+NOTICE&event_description=Closure+ %2D+CLOSURE+NOTICE+RECEIVED+&mytype=pa
m-22-846769091-b 6 of 7 NW 0.45 /
2,366.83

2.11 /
-10

CLEARWATER ENVIRONMENTAL

MANAGEMENT DBA ALVISO

INDEPENDENT OIL
5002 ARCHER ST
ALVISO CA 950020000
p1p-846769091-y1y
Estor/EPA ID: CAL000048571 Assembly District: 25
Site Code: 200534 Senate District: 10
Nat Priority List: Permit Renewal Lead:

APN: Public Partici Spclst:

Census Tract: Project Manager:

Site Type: CLOSED County: SANTA CLARA
Address Description: 5002 ARCHER ST Latitude: 37.427826 Office: Longitude: -121.972199
Special Program: Acres:

Funding: Supervisor:

Cleanup Status:

Cleanup Oversight Agencies:
22 ENVIROSTOR
147 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
School District:

Past Use that Caused Contam:

Potential Media Affected:

Potential Contamin of Concern:

Site History:

Status: CLOSED
A2 Program Type: HAZ WASTE - Standardized
CalEnviroScreen Score: 81-85%
Summary Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/hwmp_profile_report?global_id=CAL000048571 Permit Units - Completed Activities
Unit: NO PERMIT ACTIVITIES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED FOR THIS SITE Event Description:

Date:

Doc Link:

2.11 /
-10

CLEARWATER ENV MGMT DBA

ALVISO INDEPENDENT OIL
5002 ARCHER ST
ALVISO CA 950020000
p1p-866002291-y1y
Estor/EPA ID: 60002564 Assembly District: 25
Site Code: 200534, 601698 Senate District: 10
Nat Priority List: NO Permit Renewal Lead:

APN: 01505034 Public Partici Spclst:

Census Tract: 6085504602 Project Manager: MELESSIA DOWNHAM Site Type: CORRECTIVE ACTION County: SANTA CLARA
Address Description: 5002 ARCHER ST Latitude: 37.42982
Office: NORTHERN CALIFORNIA SCHOOLS &

SANTA SUSANA
Longitude: -121.973624
Special Program: Acres: 1 ACRES
Funding: NOT APPLICABLE Supervisor: LORA JAMESON
Cleanup Status: ACTIVE AS OF 10/17/2017
Cleanup Oversight Agencies: DTSC - SITE CLEANUP PROGRAM - LEAD AGENCY School District:

Past Use that Caused Contam: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Contamin of Concern:

NONE SPECIFIED
Site History:

Clearwater Environmental Management, doing business as Alviso Independent Oil, operated a hazardous waste storage and transfer facility for wastes from off-site generators. The facility consists of a leased area within a seven (7) acre parcel (APN 015-12-063) at the very end of Archer Street and is offset by 64 feet to the northeast from the end of Archer Street in Alviso, CA. Archer Street officially ends at State Street in San Jose. The facility property is located behind 1341 Archer Street right on the edge of the Alviso Slough. The nearest residences are located on State Street within a quarter mile.

The wastes stored and transferred by Alviso are generated from gas stations, lube change businesses, car dealers and industrial accounts. Occasional pickups include oily wastewater and sludge from used oil tanks, and oily water from spill cleanups. The off-spec petroleum wastes that Alviso receives come from refineries. The wastes were transported from offsite generators to the facility on a "milkrun" modified manifest system where only one 22 ENVIROSTOR
148 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
manifest addresses an entire truckload of wastes. The wastes were stored in containers or tanks..

Status: ACTIVE
A2 Program Type: CORRECTIVE ACTION
CalEnviroScreen Score: 81-85%
Summary Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=60002564 m-23-820222869-b 1 of 2 SSW 0.45 /
2,396.30

7.05 /
-5
All Purpose Landfill
5500 Lafayette St
Santa Clara CA 95054
p1p-820222869-y1y
SWIS No: 43-AO-0001 Latitude: 37.41639
EPA Fed Registry ID: Longitude: -121.97056
Operational Status: Closed County: Santa Clara
Regulatory Status: Permitted Site ZIP: 95054
Site is Archived: No ARB District: Bay Area
Absorbed on: SWRCB Region: San Francisco Bay
Absorbed by: Site Point of Contact: Janelle Heinzler
Site Inert Debris Eng Fill: No
Closed Illegal Aband: Yes
Closed Illegal Aband Cat: C1
Finance Assuran Responsible: Yes
Incorporated City: Santa Clara
Local Government: Santa Clara
Reporting Agency Legal Name: County of Santa Clara
Reporting Agency Department: Department of Environmental Health, Hazardous Material Compliance Division Enforcing Agency Legal Name: County of Santa Clara
Enforcing Agency Department: Department of Environmental Health, Hazardous Material Compliance Division Site Owners
Site Type: Disposal Only Contact Name: Dave Staub
Owner Name: City Of Santa Clara Contact First Name: Dave Owner Address: 1500 Warburton Ave Contact Last Name: Staub Owner City: Santa Clara Contact Title: Director, City Street Dept Owner State: CA Contact Email:

Owner ZIP Code: 95050 Started On: 8/16/1994
Owner Phone: (408) 615-3086
Site Activities (Search Result)
Waste Disch Req No: Throughput UOM: Tons per day
Site Regulatory Stat: Permitted Remaining Capacity: 0
Act Opl Status: Closed Remaining Cap Date:

Act Regulatory Stat: Permitted Max Permit Capacity: 0
Activity Category: Disposal Capacity UOM:

Act Classification: Solid Waste Disposal Site Total Acreage: 0 Activity is Archived: No Disposal Acreage: 0
WDR Landfill Class: Permitted Elevation: 0
Cease Operation: 10/1/1993 Permitted Elev Type:

Cease Oper Type: Actual Permitted Depth: 0
Inspection
Frequency:

Quarterly Permitted Depth Type:

Site Name: All Purpose Landfill
Activity: Solid Waste Disposal Site
Max Permitted Throughput: 400
Inert Debris Engineered Fill: No
Site Operators
Site Type: Disposal Only Is Archived: No
Operator Name: City Of Santa Clara Contact Name: Dave Staub Operator Address: 1500 Warburton Avenue Contact First Name: Dave Operator City: Santa Clara Contact Last Name: Staub
23 SWF/LF
149 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Operator State: CA Contact Title: Director, City Street Dept Operator ZIP Code: 95050 Contact Email:

Operator Phone: (408) 615-3086 Started on: 8/16/1994
Site Waste
Site Type: Disposal Only Activity Category: Disposal
Waste Type: Construction/demolition Act Classification: Solid Waste Disposal Site Activity Oper Status: Closed Activity Is Archived: No
Act Regulatory Stat: Permitted
Activity: Solid Waste Disposal Site
Site Type: Disposal Only Activity Category: Disposal
Waste Type: Industrial Act Classification: Solid Waste Disposal Site Activity Oper Status: Closed Activity Is Archived: No
Act Regulatory Stat: Permitted
Activity: Solid Waste Disposal Site
Extra Details
Enforcement Agency (LEA/EA): Santa Clara County
Site Activities (Export)
WDR No: Remaining Capacity: 0
WDR Landfill Class: Remaining Cap Dt:

Act is Archived: No Max Permit Cap: 0
Act Opl Status: Closed Capacity UOM:

Act Regulatory Stat: Permitted Total Acreage: 0.00
Activity Category: Disposal Disposal Acreage: 0.00
Act Classification: Solid Waste Disposal Site Permitted Elev : 0 Cease Operation: 10/1/1993 Permitted Elev Tp:

Cease Operation Tp: Actual Permitted Depth: 0
Insp Frequency: Quarterly Permitted Depth Tp:

Site Name: All Purpose Landfill
Site Point of Contact: Janelle Heinzler
Activity: Solid Waste Disposal Site
Max Permitted Throughput: 400
Throughput UOM: Tons per day
m-23-890874651-b 2 of 2 SSW 0.45 /
2,396.30

7.05 /
-5

ALL PURPOSE LANDFILL
5500 LAFAYETTE ST
SANTA CLARA CA 95050
p1p-890874651-y1y
Certification ID: CP0009 Monday Hours:

Certification Status: Tuesday Hours:

Registration ID: Wednesday Hours:

Application ID: Thursday Hours:

Operation Begin Date: 01/12/89 Friday Hours:

Operation End Date: 08/04/94 Saturday Hours:

Org or Agency: Sunday Hours:

Agency: Aluminium: YES
Grand Fathered: Glass:

Phone No: (408) 988-8028 Plastic:

County: SANTA CLARA Bimetal:

Rural:

Organization:

Mailing Address:

Mailing City:

Mailing State:

Mailing Zip:

Website:

Email:
23 CONTAINER
RECY
150 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
m-24-820223048-b 1 of 1 WNW 0.46 /
2,438.36

9.05 /
-3
Sainte Claire Landfill
Gold And Moffat St
Alviso (In San Jose) CA 95002
p1p-820223048-y1y
SWIS No: 43-CR-0008 Latitude: 37.42373
EPA Fed Registry ID: Longitude: -121.97585
Operational Status: Closed County: Santa Clara
Regulatory Status: Unpermitted Site ZIP: 95002
Site is Archived: No ARB District: Bay Area
Absorbed on: SWRCB Region: San Francisco Bay
Absorbed by: Site Point of Contact: Abel Martinez-Centeno Site Inert Debris Eng Fill: No
Closed Illegal Aband: Yes
Closed Illegal Aband Cat: C1
Finance Assuran Responsible: No
Incorporated City: Santa Clara County (Unincorporated)
Local Government: Santa Clara County (Unincorporated)
Reporting Agency Legal Name: City of San Jose
Reporting Agency Department: Department of Planning, Building, and Code Enforcement Enforcing Agency Legal Name: City of San Jose
Enforcing Agency Department: Department of Planning, Building, and Code Enforcement Site Activities (Search Result)
Waste Disch Req No: Throughput UOM:

Site Regulatory Stat: Unpermitted Remaining Capacity: 0 Act Opl Status: Closed Remaining Cap Date:

Act Regulatory Stat: Unpermitted Max Permit Capacity: 0 Activity Category: Disposal Capacity UOM:

Act Classification: Solid Waste Disposal Site Total Acreage: 0 Activity is Archived: No Disposal Acreage: 0
WDR Landfill Class: Permitted Elevation: 0
Cease Operation: Permitted Elev Type:

Cease Oper Type: Permitted Depth: 0
Inspection
Frequency:

Quarterly Permitted Depth Type:

Site Name: Sainte Claire Landfill
Activity: Solid Waste Disposal Site
Max Permitted Throughput: 0
Inert Debris Engineered Fill: No
Extra Details
Enforcement Agency (LEA/EA): San Jose
Site Activities (Export)
WDR No: Remaining Capacity: 0
WDR Landfill Class: Remaining Cap Dt:

Act is Archived: No Max Permit Cap: 0
Act Opl Status: Closed Capacity UOM:

Act Regulatory Stat: Unpermitted Total Acreage: 0.00
Activity Category: Disposal Disposal Acreage: 0.00
Act Classification: Solid Waste Disposal Site Permitted Elev : 0 Cease Operation: Permitted Elev Tp:

Cease Operation Tp: Permitted Depth: 0
Insp Frequency: Quarterly Permitted Depth Tp:

Site Name: Sainte Claire Landfill
Site Point of Contact: Abel Martinez-Centeno
Activity: Solid Waste Disposal Site
Max Permitted Throughput: 0
Throughput UOM:
24 SWF/LF
151 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
m-25-820180149-b 1 of 1 WNW 0.47 /
2,458.04

2.39 /
-10

PRIVATE RESIDENCE

PRIVATE RESIDENCE
SAN JOSE CA 95101
p1p-820180149-y1y
Global ID: T0608501811 County: SANTA CLARA
Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED Latitude: 37.426255
Status Date: 11/21/1995 Longitude: -121.974778
Case Type: LUST CLEANUP SITE
Date Source: LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Search; LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download
LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Facilities Detail(as Nov 16 2020) RB Case No: Potential COC: Gasoline
Local Case No: How Discovered:

Begin Date: 1/1/1994 Stop Method:

Lead Agency: SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOP Stop Description:

Local Agency: SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOP Case Worker: UST
CUF Case: NO File Location: All Files are on GeoTracker or in the Local Agency Database
Potential Media of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water) How Discovered Description:

Calwater Watershed Name: Santa Clara - Coyote Creek (205.30) DWR GW Subbasin Name: Santa Clara Valley - Santa Clara (2-009.02) Disadvantaged Community:

Site History:

LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Regulatory Activity(as Nov 16 2020) Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date : 11/21/1995
Action: Closure/No Further Action Letter
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 4/20/1995
Action: Other Report / Document
Action Type: Other
Date : 1/1/1994
Action: Leak Reported
LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Regulatory Contacts(as Nov 16 2020) Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Address: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300 Contact Name: UST CASE WORKER Email:

City: SAN JOSE Phone No: 4089183400
Organization Name: SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOP
Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Address: 1515 CLAY ST SUITE 1400 Contact Name: Regional Water Board Email:

City: OAKLAND Phone No:

Organization Name: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)
LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Status History(as Nov 16 2020) Status: Completed - Case Closed
Status Date: 11/21/1995
Status: Open - Case Begin Date
Status Date: 1/1/1994
LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Regulatory Profile (as of Oct 06, 2020) 25 LUST
152 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Site Facility Name: PRIVATE RESIDENCE Potential COC: GASOLINE Site Facility Type: LUST CLEANUP SITE Facility Type:

Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED Composting Method:

Project Status: Address: PRIVATE RESIDENCE
WDR Place Type: City: SAN JOSE
WDR File: Zip: 95101
WDR Order: County: SANTA CLARA
CUF Priority Assig: CUF Claim:

CUF Amount Paid:

File Location: ALL FILES ARE ON GEOTRACKER OR IN THE LOCAL AGENCY DATABASE Designated Beneficial Use: MUN, AGR, IND, PROC
Project Oversight Agencies:

Report Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report?global_id=T0608501811 Cleanup Status Detail: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED AS OF 11/21/1995 Cleanup History Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report_include?global_id=T0608501811&tabname=regulatoryhistory Potential Media of Concern: OTHER GROUNDWATER (USES OTHER THAN DRINKING WATER) User Defined Beneficial Use:

DWR GW Sub Basin: Santa Clara Valley - Santa Clara (2-009.02) Calwater Watershed Name: Santa Clara - Coyote Creek (205.30) Post Closure Site Management:

Future Land Use:

Cleanup Oversight Agencies: SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOP (LEAD) CASEWORKER: UST CASE WORKER
SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)
CASEWORKER: Regional Water Board
SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT - CASE #: 06S1W09G04f Gndwater Monitoring Freque:

Designated Beneficial Use
Desc:

Municipal and Domestic Supply, Agricultural Supply, Industrial Service Supply, Industrial Process Supply Site History:

No site history available
LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Cleanup Status History (as of Oct 06, 2020) Status: Completed - Case Closed
Date : 11/21/1995
Status: Open - Case Begin Date
Date : 1/1/1994
LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Regulatory Activities (as of Oct 06, 2020) Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions
Action Date: 11/21/1995
Received Issue Date: 11/21/1995
Action: Closure/No Further Action Letter
Doc Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0608501811&enforcement_id=6151520&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments:

Action Type: Response Requested - Other
Action Date: 4/20/1995
Received Issue Date: 4/20/1995
Action: Other Report / Document
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608501811&doc_id=5764321 Title Description Comments:

SCVWD Electronic Files
Action Type: Leak Action
Action Date: 1/1/1994
Received Issue Date:

Action: Leak Reported
153 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Doc Link:

Title Description Comments:

LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Documents (as of Oct 06, 2020) Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 11/21/1995 Submitted By: COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA STUDENT

INTERN (REGULATOR)
Type: CLOSURE/NO FURTHER ACTION LETTER Submitted:

Title: UNKNOWN
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608501811&enforcement_id=6151520 Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 4/20/1995 Submitted By: COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA STUDENT

INTERN (REGULATOR)
Type: OTHER REPORT / DOCUMENT Submitted:

Title: SCVWD ELECTRONIC FILES - REGULATOR RESPONSE
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608501811&document_id=5764321 m-26-820144436-b 1 of 2 WNW 0.48 /
2,548.81

3.87 /
-8
San Jose Fire Station #25
1590 Gold St San Jose
CA
p1p-820144436-y1y
SCVWD ID: 06S1W09G01f
Closure Date: 1/28/2002
Link: http://lustop.sccgov.org/files/06S1W09G01f/
m-26-820179486-b 2 of 2 WNW 0.48 /
2,548.81

3.87 /
-8
SAN JOSE FIRE STATION #25
1590 GOLD ST
SAN JOSE CA 95101
p1p-820179486-y1y
Global ID: T0608501172 County: SANTA CLARA
Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED Latitude: 37.4253206331789 Status Date: 1/28/2002 Longitude: -121.975858211517
Case Type: LUST CLEANUP SITE
Date Source: LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Search; LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download
LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Facilities Detail(as Nov 16 2020) RB Case No: Potential COC: Gasoline
Local Case No: How Discovered:

Begin Date: 6/24/1984 Stop Method:

Lead Agency: SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOP Stop Description:

Calwater Watershed Name: Santa Clara - Coyote Creek (205.30) DWR GW Subbasin Name: Santa Clara Valley - Santa Clara (2-009.02) Disadvantaged Community:

Site History:

LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Regulatory Activity(as Nov 16 2020) Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date : 1/28/2002
Action: Closure/No Further Action Letter
Action Type: RESPONSE
26 26

SANTACLARA
LO
LUST
154 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Date : 11/26/2001
Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 9/10/2001
Action: Correspondence
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 8/27/2001
Action: Other Report / Document
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 8/24/2001
Action: Verbal Communication
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 7/25/2001
Action: Other Report / Document
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 7/9/2001
Action: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 7/16/2000
Action: Other Report / Document
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 7/16/2000
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 2/25/1999
Action: Other Report / Document
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 1/21/1999
Action: Correspondence
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date : 12/18/1998
Action: Staff Letter - #32685
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 4/17/1998
Action: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date : 2/11/1998
Action: Staff Letter - #32683
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 10/15/1996
Action: Remedial Progress Report
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date : 8/19/1996
Action: Staff Letter - #32681
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date : 8/12/1996
Action: Notice of Responsibility - #40382
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 2/19/1987
Action: Unauthorized Release Form
Action Type: Other
Date : 6/24/1984
155 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Action: Leak Reported
LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Regulatory Contacts(as Nov 16 2020) Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Address: 1515 CLAY ST SUITE 1400 Contact Name: Regional Water Board Email:

City: OAKLAND Phone No:

Organization Name: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)
Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Address: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300 Contact Name: UST CASE WORKER Email:

City: SAN JOSE Phone No: 4089183400
Organization Name: SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOP
LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Status History(as Nov 16 2020) Status: Completed - Case Closed
Status Date: 1/28/2002
Status: Open - Site Assessment
Status Date: 1/13/1987
Status: Open - Case Begin Date
Status Date: 6/24/1984
LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Regulatory Profile (as of Oct 06, 2020) Site Facility Name: SAN JOSE FIRE STATION #25 Potential COC: GASOLINE Site Facility Type: LUST CLEANUP SITE Facility Type:

Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED Composting Method:

Project Status: Address: 1590 GOLD ST
WDR Place Type: City: SAN JOSE
WDR File: Zip: 95101
WDR Order: County: SANTA CLARA
CUF Priority Assig: CUF Claim:

CUF Amount Paid:

File Location: ALL FILES ARE ON GEOTRACKER OR IN THE LOCAL AGENCY DATABASE Designated Beneficial Use: MUN, AGR, IND, PROC
Project Oversight Agencies:

Report Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report?global_id=T0608501172 Cleanup Status Detail: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED AS OF 1/28/2002 Cleanup History Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report_include?global_id=T0608501172&tabname=regulatoryhistory Potential Media of Concern: OTHER GROUNDWATER (USES OTHER THAN DRINKING WATER) User Defined Beneficial Use:

DWR GW Sub Basin: Santa Clara Valley - Santa Clara (2-009.02) Calwater Watershed Name: Santa Clara - Coyote Creek (205.30) Post Closure Site Management:

Future Land Use:

Designated Beneficial Use
Desc:

Municipal and Domestic Supply, Agricultural Supply, Industrial Service Supply, Industrial Process Supply Site History:

No site history available
LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Cleanup Status History (as of Oct 06, 2020) Status: Completed - Case Closed
Date : 1/28/2002
156 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Status: Open - Site Assessment
Date : 1/13/1987
Status: Open - Case Begin Date
Date : 6/24/1984
LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Regulatory Activities (as of Oct 06, 2020) Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions
Action Date: 1/28/2002
Received Issue Date: 1/28/2002
Action: Closure/No Further Action Letter
Doc Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0608501172&enforcement_id=6261186&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments:

Action Type: Response Requested - Reports
Action Date: 11/26/2001
Received Issue Date: 11/26/2001
Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608501172&doc_id=5858467 Title Description Comments:

GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT REPORT
Action Type: Response Requested - Other
Action Date: 9/10/2001
Received Issue Date: 9/10/2001
Action: Correspondence
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608501172&doc_id=5858458 Title Description Comments:

CORRESPONDENCE FILE FROM LUSTOP 12/22/1989-9/10/2001
Action Type: Response Requested - Other
Action Date: 8/27/2001
Received Issue Date: 8/27/2001
Action: Other Report / Document
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608501172&doc_id=5858457 Title Description Comments:

AMENDMENT FROM LUSTOP
Action Type: Response Requested - Other
Action Date: 8/24/2001
Received Issue Date: 8/24/2001
Action: Verbal Communication
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608501172&doc_id=5858462 Title Description Comments:

PHONE LOG FROM LUSTROP 08/8/1996-8/24/2001
Action Type: Response Requested - Other
Action Date: 7/25/2001
Received Issue Date: 7/25/2001
Action: Other Report / Document
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608501172&doc_id=5858456 Title Description Comments:

ADDENDUM FROM LUSTOP
Action Type: Response Requested - Workplans
157 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Action Date: 7/9/2001
Received Issue Date: 7/9/2001
Action: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608501172&doc_id=5858465 Title Description Comments:

WORKPLAN
Action Type: Response Requested - Reports
Action Date: 7/16/2000
Received Issue Date: 7/16/2000
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608501172&doc_id=5858459 Title Description Comments:

QUARTERLY GROUNDWATER REPORT
Action Type: Response Requested - Reports
Action Date: 7/16/2000
Received Issue Date: 7/16/2000
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608501172&doc_id=5858460 Title Description Comments:

QUARTERLY GROUNDWATER REPORT
Action Type: Response Requested - Other
Action Date: 7/16/2000
Received Issue Date: 7/16/2000
Action: Other Report / Document
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608501172&doc_id=5858461 Title Description Comments:

MAPS METROSCAN FROM LUSTOP
Action Type: Response Requested - Other
Action Date: 2/25/1999
Received Issue Date: 8/18/2000
Action: Other Report / Document
Doc Link:

Title Description Comments:

Additional Information Report
Action Type: Response Requested - Other
Action Date: 1/21/1999
Received Issue Date: 1/21/1999
Action: Correspondence
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608501172&doc_id=5858464 Title Description Comments:

STATE RELATED COORESPONDENCE FROM LUSTOP 08/13/1996-1/21/1999 Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions
Action Date: 12/18/1998
Received Issue Date: 12/18/1998
Action: Staff Letter - #32685
Doc Link:

Title Description Comments:

Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions
Action Date: 2/11/1998
Received Issue Date: 2/11/1998
158 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Action: Staff Letter - #32683
Doc Link:

Title Description Comments:

Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions
Action Date: 8/19/1996
Received Issue Date: 8/19/1996
Action: Staff Letter - #32681
Doc Link:

Title Description Comments:

Action Type: Notices
Action Date: 8/12/1996
Received Issue Date: 8/12/1996
Action: Notice of Responsibility - #40382
Doc Link:

Title Description Comments:

Action Type: Response Requested - Other
Action Date: 2/19/1987
Received Issue Date: 2/19/1987
Action: Unauthorized Release Form
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608501172&doc_id=5858466 Title Description Comments:

URF
Action Type: Response Requested - Workplans
Action Date: 4/17/1998
Received Issue Date:

Action: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan
Doc Link:

Title Description Comments:

Soil and Water Investigation Workplan
Action Type: Response Requested - Reports
Action Date: 10/15/1996
Received Issue Date:

Action: Remedial Progress Report
Doc Link:

Title Description Comments:

Remedial Progress Report
Action Type: Leak Action
Action Date: 6/24/1984
Received Issue Date:

Action: Leak Reported
Doc Link:

Title Description Comments:

LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Documents (as of Oct 06, 2020) Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 1/28/2002 Submitted By: CANDACE GARCIA (REGULATOR) Type: CLOSURE/NO FURTHER ACTION LETTER Submitted:

Title: UNKNOWN
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608501172&enforcement_id=6261186 Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 11/26/2001 Submitted By: CANDACE GARCIA (REGULATOR) 159 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Type: SOIL AND WATER INVESTIGATION
REPORT
Submitted:

Title: GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT REPORT
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608501172&document_id=5858467 Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 9/10/2001 Submitted By: CANDACE GARCIA (REGULATOR) Type: CORRESPONDENCE Submitted:

Title: CORRESPONDENCE FILE FROM LUSTOP 12/22/1989-9/10/2001 Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608501172&document_id=5858458 Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 8/27/2001 Submitted By: CANDACE GARCIA (REGULATOR) Type: OTHER REPORT / DOCUMENT Submitted:

Title: AMENDMENT FROM LUSTOP
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608501172&document_id=5858457 Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 8/24/2001 Submitted By: CANDACE GARCIA (REGULATOR) Type: VERBAL COMMUNICATION Submitted:

Title: PHONE LOG FROM LUSTROP 08/8/1996-8/24/2001
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608501172&document_id=5858462 Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 7/25/2001 Submitted By: CANDACE GARCIA (REGULATOR) Type: OTHER REPORT / DOCUMENT Submitted:

Title: ADDENDUM FROM LUSTOP
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608501172&document_id=5858456 Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 7/9/2001 Submitted By: CANDACE GARCIA (REGULATOR) Type: SOIL AND WATER INVESTIGATION

WORKPLAN
Submitted:

Title: WORKPLAN
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608501172&document_id=5858465 Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 581 KB
Document Date: 7/16/2000 Submitted By: CANDACE GARCIA (REGULATOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted:

Title: QUARTERLY GROUNDWATER REPORT -
Title Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/regulators/deliverable_documents/2639485239/GWM%5FR%5F2000% 2D07%2D16%2Epdf
Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 581 KB
Document Date: 7/16/2000 Submitted By: CANDACE GARCIA (REGULATOR) Type: MONITORING REPORT - QUARTERLY Submitted:

Title: QUARTERLY GROUNDWATER REPORT -
Title Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/regulators/deliverable_documents/2520063638/GWM%5FR%5F2000% 2D07%2D16%2Epdf
Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 7/16/2000 Submitted By: CANDACE GARCIA (REGULATOR) Type: OTHER REPORT / DOCUMENT Submitted:

Title: MAPS METROSCAN FROM LUSTOP
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608501172&document_id=5858461 Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 1/21/1999 Submitted By: CANDACE GARCIA (REGULATOR) Type: CORRESPONDENCE Submitted:

Title: STATE RELATED COORESPONDENCE FROM LUSTOP 08/13/1996-1/21/1999 Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608501172&document_id=5858464 Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 2/19/1987 Submitted By: CANDACE GARCIA (REGULATOR) Type: UNAUTHORIZED RELEASE FORM Submitted:

Title: URF
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608501172&document_id=5858466 160 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
m-27-820361053-b 1 of 1 SSW 0.49 /
2,582.00

8.62 /
-3

ALL PURPOSE LANDFILL
5401 LAFAYETTE STREET
SANTA CLARA CA 95054
p1p-820361053-y1y
Estor/EPA ID: 43490056 Assembly District: 25
Site Code: Senate District: 10
Nat Priority List: NO Permit Renewal Lead:

APN: NONE SPECIFIED Public Partici Spclst:

Census Tract: 6085505001 Project Manager:

Site Type: * HISTORICAL County: SANTA CLARA
Address Description: 5401 LAFAYETTE STREET Latitude: 37.4116914 Office: CLEANUP BERKELEY Longitude: -121.9697979
Special Program: * SITE CHAR & ASSESS GRANT (CERCLA
104)
Acres: NONE SPECIFIED
Funding: Supervisor:

Cleanup Status: REFER: RWQCB AS OF 5/8/1989
Cleanup Oversight Agencies: NONE SPECIFIED
School District:

Past Use that Caused Contam: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Contamin of Concern:

ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS (ACM), CONTAMINATED SOIL, EMPTY CONTAINERS, LESS THAN 30 GALLONS, HOUSEHOLD WASTES Site History:

Status: REFER: RWQCB
A2 Program Type: HISTORICAL
CalEnviroScreen Score: 46-50%
Summary Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=43490056 Completed Activities
Title: Site Screening
Title Link:

Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Site Screening
Date Completed: 10/6/1987
Comments: Site Screening Done: Operator (Mission): Union Carbide, 270 Park Avenue, NY, NY 10017, (212) 551-4515. Site is adjacent to Santa Clara Landfill.

Title: Discovery
Title Link:

Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: * Discovery
Date Completed: 9/24/1981
Comments: Inactive site identified via Superfund Notification.

Title: Discovery
Title Link:

Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: * Discovery
Date Completed: 10/12/1983
Comments: Records Search: ERRIS.
m-28-820142777-b 1 of 2 NW 0.50 /
2,630.05

2.95 /
-9
George Maciel Trucking
1252 State St San Jose
p1p-820142777-y1y
27 28

ENVIROSTOR

SANTACLARA
LO
161 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
CA
SCVWD ID: 06S1W09H01f
Closure Date:

Link: http://lustop.sccgov.org/files/06S1W09H01f/
m-28-820192448-b 2 of 2 NW 0.50 /
2,630.05

2.95 /
-9

GEORGE MACIEL TRUCKING
1252 STATE STREET
SAN JOSE CA 95002
p1p-820192448-y1y
Global ID: T0608552020 County: SANTA CLARA
Status: OPEN - ASSESSMENT & INTERIM

REMEDIAL ACTION
Latitude: 37.427991688169
Status Date: 12/4/2017 Longitude: -121.974039673805
Case Type: LUST CLEANUP SITE
Date Source: LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Search; LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download
LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Facilities Detail(as Nov 16 2020) RB Case No: 14-579 Potential COC: Diesel
Local Case No: 06S1W09H01f How Discovered: Tank Closure Begin Date: 7/8/1999 Stop Method: Close and Remove Tank Lead Agency: SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOP Stop Description:

Local Agency: SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOP Case Worker: TLF
CUF Case: YES File Location: All Files are on GeoTracker or in the Local Agency Database
Potential Media of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water) How Discovered Description:

Calwater Watershed Name: Santa Clara - Coyote Creek (205.30) DWR GW Subbasin Name: Santa Clara Valley - Santa Clara (2-009.02) Disadvantaged Community:

Site History:

LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Regulatory Activity(as Nov 16 2020) Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 8/7/2020
Action: Other Workplan
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date : 6/3/2020
Action: Staff Letter
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date : 1/28/2020
Action: Staff Letter
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date : 8/15/2019
Action: Clean Up Fund - Case Closure Review Summary Report (RSR) Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 6/14/2019
28 LUST
162 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Action: Other Report / Document - Regulator Responded
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date : 3/12/2019
Action: Staff Letter
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 1/11/2019
Action: Site Assessment Report - Regulator Responded
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 10/30/2018
Action: Monitoring Report - Semi-Annually
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date : 10/9/2018
Action: Email Correspondence
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date : 8/14/2018
Action: Staff Letter
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 8/7/2018
Action: Other Workplan - Regulator Responded
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date : 6/7/2018
Action: Staff Letter
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 5/25/2018
Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report - Regulator Responded Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 4/30/2018
Action: Monitoring Report - Semi-Annually
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date : 2/21/2018
Action: Staff Letter
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 2/2/2018
Action: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan - Regulator Responded Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date : 12/4/2017
Action: Staff Letter
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 11/30/2017
Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 10/30/2017
Action: Monitoring Report - Semi-Annually
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date : 10/24/2017
Action: Email Correspondence
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date : 9/8/2017
Action: Staff Letter
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 8/11/2017
Action: Monitoring Report - Semi-Annually
163 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date : 8/8/2017
Action: Staff Letter
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 7/30/2017
Action: Monitoring Report - Semi-Annually
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 7/30/2017
Action: Well Installation Report
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date : 5/12/2017
Action: Staff Letter
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 4/30/2017
Action: Monitoring Report - Semi-Annually
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 3/30/2017
Action: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan - Regulator Responded Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date : 3/27/2017
Action: Staff Letter
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date : 2/23/2017
Action: Staff Letter
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 12/30/2016
Action: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan - Regulator Responded Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date : 10/27/2016
Action: Staff Letter
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date : 9/24/2015
Action: Notice to Comply
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 5/8/2015
Action: Interim Remedial Action Report
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 4/30/2015
Action: Monitoring Report - Semi-Annually
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date : 1/22/2015
Action: Staff Letter
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 1/9/2015
Action: Remedial Progress Report
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 10/30/2014
Action: Monitoring Report - Semi-Annually
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date : 9/11/2014
Action: Staff Letter
164 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 9/5/2014
Action: Well Installation Workplan - Regulator Responded Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date : 7/10/2014
Action: Staff Letter
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 3/5/2014
Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 12/20/2013
Action: Well Installation Report
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 8/21/2013
Action: Correspondence
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date : 8/21/2013
Action: Staff Letter
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 8/16/2013
Action: Well Installation Workplan - Regulator Responded Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 8/12/2013
Action: Proposed Plan
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date : 6/28/2013
Action: Staff Letter
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 6/17/2013
Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date : 5/23/2013
Action: Notice to Comply
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 1/18/2013
Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 1/10/2013
Action: Verbal Communication
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date : 9/20/2012
Action: Staff Letter
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 8/31/2012
Action: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan - Regulator Responded Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 8/30/2012
Action: Proposed Plan
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date : 7/13/2012
Action: Staff Letter
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
165 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Date : 3/17/2011
Action: Staff Letter
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 10/19/2009
Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 10/19/2009
Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report - Regulator Responded Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 9/29/2009
Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date : 7/14/2009
Action: Staff Letter
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 5/8/2009
Action: Preliminary Site Assessment Workplan
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 4/29/2009
Action: Proposed Plan
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date : 4/16/2009
Action: Warning Letter
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date : 6/21/2005
Action: Warning Letter - #32690
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 9/27/2001
Action: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date : 8/27/2001
Action: Staff Letter - #32690
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 5/17/2001
Action: Correspondence
Action Type: Other
Date : 4/19/2000
Action: Leak Reported
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 4/19/2000
Action: Unauthorized Release Form
Action Type: Other
Date : 7/8/1999
Action: Leak Stopped
Action Type: Other
Date : 7/8/1999
Action: Leak Discovery
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date : 8/1/1983
Action: Other Report / Document
LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Regulatory Contacts(as Nov 16 2020) 166 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Address: 1515 CLAY ST SUITE 1400 Contact Name: Regional Water Board Email:

City: OAKLAND Phone No:

Organization Name: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)
Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Address: 1555 Berger Dr.

Contact Name: TRAVIS L. FLORA Email: [email protected] City: SAN JOSE Phone No: 4089183486
Organization Name: SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOP
LUST Cleanup Sites from GeoTracker Cleanup Sites Data Download - Status History(as Nov 16 2020) Status: Open - Assessment & Interim Remedial Action
Status Date: 12/4/2017
Status: Open - Verification Monitoring
Status Date: 10/20/2015
Status: Open - Site Assessment
Status Date: 4/19/2000
Status: Open - Case Begin Date
Status Date: 7/8/1999
LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Regulatory Profile (as of Oct 06, 2020) Site Facility Name: GEORGE MACIEL TRUCKING Potential COC: DIESEL Site Facility Type: LUST CLEANUP SITE Facility Type:

Cleanup Status: OPEN - ASSESSMENT & INTERIM

REMEDIAL ACTION
Composting Method:

Project Status: Address: 1252 STATE STREET
WDR Place Type: City: SAN JOSE
WDR File: Zip: 95002
WDR Order: County: SANTA CLARA
CUF Priority Assig: C CUF Claim: 15417
CUF Amount Paid: $150,924
File Location: ALL FILES ARE ON GEOTRACKER OR IN THE LOCAL AGENCY DATABASE Designated Beneficial Use: MUN, AGR, IND, PROC
Project Oversight Agencies:

Report Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report?global_id=T0608552020 Cleanup Status Detail: OPEN - ASSESSMENT & INTERIM REMEDIAL ACTION AS OF 12/4/2017 Cleanup History Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report_include?global_id=T0608552020&tabname=regulatoryhistory Potential Media of Concern: OTHER GROUNDWATER (USES OTHER THAN DRINKING WATER) User Defined Beneficial Use:

DWR GW Sub Basin: Santa Clara Valley - Santa Clara (2-009.02) Calwater Watershed Name: Santa Clara - Coyote Creek (205.30) Post Closure Site Management:

Future Land Use:

Cleanup Oversight Agencies: SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOP (LEAD) - CASE #: 06S1W09H01f CASEWORKER: TRAVIS L. FLORA
SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2) - CASE #: 14-579
CASEWORKER: Regional Water Board
Gndwater Monitoring Freque:

Designated Beneficial Use
Desc:

Municipal and Domestic Supply, Agricultural Supply, Industrial Service Supply, Industrial Process Supply Site History:

On July 8th 1999 , one 10,000 gallon underground tank last containing diesel was removed. According to visual descriptions by Inspector Jeff Mouroux of the San Jose Fire Department, the tank was intact with no visible corrosion holes, however the excavation contained visible and olfactory signs of oil on the tank, on the excavation sidewalls and on the groundwater, described as black and oil like. Two soil samples were recovered from each end of the tank, along the excavation sidewall at the soil groundwater interface (approximately 11 feet bgs.). One groundwater grab sample was also recovered from the bottom of the excavation. Both samples were recovered under the direction of Inspector Mouroux. Soil samples "T-1" and "T-2" contained 290 parts per million (ppm) and 290 ppm of TPH as diesel respectively, while groundwater sample "GW" contained 9.6 ppm TPH as diesel. It was noted by the analytical lab that all three samples were diluted due to high concentrations of non-target hydrocarbons and that although the soil sample results were within quantitation range, the chromatographic pattern was not typical of fuel. Opinion of ERS is that the contaminate visually and analytically observed may also be that of a heavier hydrocarbon, such as motor oil, and that future samples also be analyzed for TPH as motor oil. 167 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Cleanup Status History (as of Oct 06, 2020) Status: Open - Assessment & Interim Remedial Action
Date : 12/4/2017
Status: Open - Verification Monitoring
Date : 10/20/2015
Status: Open - Site Assessment
Date : 4/19/2000
Status: Open - Case Begin Date
Date : 7/8/1999
LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Regulatory Activities (as of Oct 06, 2020) Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions
Action Date: 6/3/2020
Received Issue Date: 6/3/2020
Action: Staff Letter
Doc Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6437217&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments:

DEH requires Additional Site Investigation Work Plan
Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions
Action Date: 1/28/2020
Received Issue Date: 1/28/2020
Action: Staff Letter
Doc Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6425976&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments:

Out of Compliance - First Notice
Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions
Action Date: 8/15/2019
Received Issue Date: 8/15/2019
Action: Clean Up Fund - Case Closure Review Summary Report (RSR) Doc Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6412723&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments:
15417 1st RSR Rationale Additional Work August 2019
Action Type: Response Requested - Other
Action Date: 6/14/2019
Received Issue Date: 4/29/2020
Action: Other Report / Document - Regulator Responded
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608552020&doc_id=5988014 Title Description Comments:

Additional Site Investigation Report
Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions
Action Date: 3/12/2019
Received Issue Date: 3/12/2019
Action: Staff Letter
Doc Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6387817&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments:
168 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
DEH requests Additional Site Investigation Report
Action Type: Response Requested - Reports
Action Date: *1/11/2019
Received Issue Date: 1/15/2019
Action: Site Assessment Report - Regulator Responded
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608552020&doc_id=5972373 Title Description Comments:

Site Investigation Report
Action Type: Response Requested - Reports
Action Date: 10/30/2018
Received Issue Date: 9/8/2018
Action: Monitoring Report - Semi-Annually
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608552020&doc_id=6160105 Title Description Comments:

Second semi-annual 2018 groundwater monitoring report
Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions
Action Date: 10/9/2018
Received Issue Date: 10/9/2018
Action: Email Correspondence
Doc Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6371758&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments:

DEH approves extension request
Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions
Action Date: 8/14/2018
Received Issue Date: 8/14/2018
Action: Staff Letter
Doc Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6366717&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments:

DEH conditionally approves work plan
Action Type: Response Requested - Workplans
Action Date: 8/7/2018
Received Issue Date: 8/7/2018
Action: Other Workplan - Regulator Responded
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608552020&doc_id=5966705 Title Description Comments:

Additional Data Gap Work Plan
Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions
Action Date: 6/7/2018
Received Issue Date: 6/7/2018
Action: Staff Letter
Doc Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6360467&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments:

DEH requires additional data gap work plan
Action Type: Response Requested - Reports
Action Date: 5/25/2018
Received Issue Date: 5/29/2018
Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report - Regulator Responded 169 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608552020&doc_id=5957559 Title Description Comments:

Additional Site Assessment Report
Action Type: Response Requested - Reports
Action Date: 4/30/2018
Received Issue Date: 4/14/2018
Action: Monitoring Report - Semi-Annually
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608552020&doc_id=6160104 Title Description Comments:

First semi-annual 2018 groundwater monitoring report
Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions
Action Date: 2/21/2018
Received Issue Date: 2/21/2018
Action: Staff Letter
Doc Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6349258&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments:

DEH req. Additional Site Assessment Report
Action Type: Response Requested - Workplans
Action Date: 2/2/2018
Received Issue Date: 2/2/2018
Action: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan - Regulator Responded Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608552020&doc_id=5949511 Title Description Comments:

Additional Site Assessment Work Plan
Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions
Action Date: 12/4/2017
Received Issue Date: 12/4/2017
Action: Staff Letter
Doc Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6342494&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments:

DEH case review, and request for Additional Site Assessment Work Plan Action Type: Response Requested - Reports
Action Date: *11/30/2017
Received Issue Date: 11/30/2017
Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608552020&doc_id=5933100 Title Description Comments:

Additional Well Point Installation Report
Action Type: Response Requested - Reports
Action Date: 10/30/2017
Received Issue Date: 8/16/2017
Action: Monitoring Report - Semi-Annually
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608552020&doc_id=6160103 Title Description Comments:

Semi-annual groundwater monitoring report
Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions
Action Date: 10/24/2017
Received Issue Date: 10/24/2017
170 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Action: Email Correspondence
Doc Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6339528&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments:
30-day extension approval
Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions
Action Date: 9/8/2017
Received Issue Date: 9/8/2017
Action: Staff Letter
Doc Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6335853&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments:

Letter approval for MW-1990 destruction, and well point/piezometer install Action Type: Response Requested - Reports
Action Date: 8/11/2017
Received Issue Date: 8/16/2017
Action: Monitoring Report - Semi-Annually
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608552020&doc_id=5949403 Title Description Comments:
2nd 2017 Semi-Annual Groundwater Report
Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions
Action Date: 8/8/2017
Received Issue Date: 8/8/2017
Action: Staff Letter
Doc Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6329568&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments:

Well Point Installation approval
Action Type: Response Requested - Reports
Action Date: 7/30/2017
Received Issue Date: 7/30/2017
Action: Well Installation Report
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608552020&doc_id=5919735 Title Description Comments:

Well Point Installation Report
Action Type: Response Requested - Reports
Action Date: 7/30/2017
Received Issue Date: 4/3/2017
Action: Monitoring Report - Semi-Annually
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608552020&doc_id=5919734 Title Description Comments:
1st 2017 SA Groundwater Monitoring Report
Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions
Action Date: 5/12/2017
Received Issue Date: 5/12/2017
Action: Staff Letter
Doc Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6319735&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments:

Groundwater Monitoring Requirements
171 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Action Type: Response Requested - Reports
Action Date: 4/30/2017
Received Issue Date: 4/3/2017
Action: Monitoring Report - Semi-Annually
Doc Link:

Title Description Comments:

Semi-annual groundwater monitoring report
Action Type: Response Requested - Workplans
Action Date: *3/30/2017
Received Issue Date: 3/15/2017
Action: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan - Regulator Responded Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608552020&doc_id=5913655 Title Description Comments:

Work Plan for Additional Site Assessment
Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions
Action Date: 3/27/2017
Received Issue Date: 3/27/2017
Action: Staff Letter
Doc Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6315237&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments:

Work Plan Approval Letter
Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions
Action Date: 2/23/2017
Received Issue Date: 2/23/2017
Action: Staff Letter
Doc Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6312533&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments:

Letter Request for Work Plan for Additional Site Assessment-Late Action Type: Response Requested - Workplans
Action Date: 12/30/2016
Received Issue Date: 3/15/2017
Action: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan - Regulator Responded Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608552020&doc_id=5904239 Title Description Comments:

Workplan for additional Site Assessment
Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions
Action Date: 10/27/2016
Received Issue Date: 10/27/2016
Action: Staff Letter
Doc Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6302164&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments:

Request for workplan submittal
Action Type: Enforcement/Orders
Action Date: 9/24/2015
Received Issue Date: 9/24/2015
Action: Notice to Comply
Doc Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6261480&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments:
172 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Action Type: Response Requested - Reports
Action Date: 5/8/2015
Received Issue Date: 10/16/2015
Action: Interim Remedial Action Report
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608552020&doc_id=5826925 Title Description Comments:

Dewatering Report
Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions
Action Date: 1/22/2015
Received Issue Date: 1/22/2015
Action: Staff Letter
Doc Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6233861&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments:

Action Type: Response Requested - Reports
Action Date: 1/9/2015
Received Issue Date: 9/29/2015
Action: Remedial Progress Report
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608552020&doc_id=5816150 Title Description Comments:

Well Installation and Groundwater Extraction Report
Action Type: Response Requested - Reports
Action Date: 10/30/2014
Received Issue Date: 11/6/2014
Action: Monitoring Report - Semi-Annually
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608552020&doc_id=5809703 Title Description Comments:

Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions
Action Date: 9/11/2014
Received Issue Date: 9/11/2014
Action: Staff Letter
Doc Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6220246&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments:

Action Type: Response Requested - Workplans
Action Date: 9/5/2014
Received Issue Date: 9/7/2014
Action: Well Installation Workplan - Regulator Responded Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608552020&doc_id=5809702 Title Description Comments:
- See 9/11/2014 directive letter.

Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions
Action Date: 7/10/2014
Received Issue Date: 7/10/2014
Action: Staff Letter
Doc Link:

Title Description Comments:

Action Type: Response Requested - Reports
Action Date: 3/5/2014
Received Issue Date: 3/5/2014
Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608552020&doc_id=5853788 173 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Title Description Comments:

GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT REPORT
Action Type: Response Requested - Reports
Action Date: 12/20/2013
Received Issue Date: 6/30/2014
Action: Well Installation Report
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608552020&doc_id=5778984 Title Description Comments:

Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions
Action Date: 8/21/2013
Received Issue Date: 8/21/2013
Action: Staff Letter
Doc Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6172306&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments:

WP Approval
Action Type: Response Requested - Other
Action Date: 8/21/2013
Received Issue Date: 8/21/2013
Action: Correspondence
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608552020&doc_id=5853782 Title Description Comments:

CORRESPONDENCE FILE FROM LUSTOP 08/27/2001-8/21/2013
Action Type: Response Requested - Workplans
Action Date: 8/16/2013
Received Issue Date: 12/5/2013
Action: Well Installation Workplan - Regulator Responded Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608552020&doc_id=5774328 Title Description Comments:
- See 8/21/2013 Directive Letter.

Action Type: Response Requested - Workplans
Action Date: 8/12/2013
Received Issue Date: 8/12/2013
Action: Proposed Plan
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608552020&doc_id=5853793 Title Description Comments:

WORKPLAN
Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions
Action Date: 6/28/2013
Received Issue Date: 6/28/2013
Action: Staff Letter
Doc Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6165162&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments:

Action Type: Response Requested - Reports
Action Date: 6/17/2013
Received Issue Date: 6/17/2013
Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608552020&doc_id=5853787 Title Description Comments:

GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT REPORT
174 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Action Type: Enforcement/Orders
Action Date: 5/23/2013
Received Issue Date: 5/23/2013
Action: Notice to Comply
Doc Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6160040&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments:

Out of Compliance Letter
Action Type: Response Requested - Other
Action Date: 1/10/2013
Received Issue Date: 1/10/2013
Action: Verbal Communication
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608552020&doc_id=5853784 Title Description Comments:

PHONE LOG FROM LUSTROP 1/10/2013
Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions
Action Date: 9/20/2012
Received Issue Date: 9/20/2012
Action: Staff Letter
Doc Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6138344&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments:

Conditional Work Plan Approval
Action Type: Response Requested - Workplans
Action Date: 8/31/2012
Received Issue Date: 8/31/2012
Action: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan - Regulator Responded Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608552020&doc_id=5742157 Title Description Comments:

Work Plan for Additional Site Assessment - See 9/20/2012 directive letter.

Action Type: Response Requested - Workplans
Action Date: 8/30/2012
Received Issue Date: 8/30/2012
Action: Proposed Plan
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608552020&doc_id=5853792 Title Description Comments:

WORKPLAN
Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions
Action Date: 7/13/2012
Received Issue Date: 7/13/2012
Action: Staff Letter
Doc Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6130198&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments:

Request for Work Plan for Additional Site Assessment
Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions
Action Date: 3/17/2011
Received Issue Date: 3/17/2011
Action: Staff Letter
Doc Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6080852&temptable=ENFORCEMENT 175 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Title Description Comments:

Late Letter for Submittal
Action Type: Response Requested - Reports
Action Date: 10/19/2009
Received Issue Date: 10/19/2009
Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608552020&doc_id=5853786 Title Description Comments:

GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT REPORT
Action Type: Response Requested - Reports
Action Date: 10/19/2009
Received Issue Date: 10/19/2009
Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report - Regulator Responded Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608552020&doc_id=5644641 Title Description Comments:

Subsurface Investigation Report
Action Type: Response Requested - Reports
Action Date: 9/29/2009
Received Issue Date: 9/29/2009
Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608552020&doc_id=5853789 Title Description Comments:

GR
Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions
Action Date: 7/14/2009
Received Issue Date: 7/14/2009
Action: Staff Letter
Doc Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6020604&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments:

Workplan Approval
Action Type: Response Requested - Workplans
Action Date: 5/8/2009
Received Issue Date: 4/29/2009
Action: Preliminary Site Assessment Workplan
Doc Link:

Title Description Comments:

Action Type: Response Requested - Workplans
Action Date: 4/29/2009
Received Issue Date: 4/29/2009
Action: Proposed Plan
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608552020&doc_id=5853791 Title Description Comments:

WORKPLAN
Action Type: Enforcement/Orders
Action Date: 4/16/2009
Received Issue Date: 4/16/2009
Action: Warning Letter
Doc Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents? global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6010264&temptable=ENFORCEMENT Title Description Comments:
176 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
2nd late ltr 2735 days late; psa wp
Action Type: Enforcement/Orders
Action Date: 6/21/2005
Received Issue Date: 6/21/2005
Action: Warning Letter - #32690
Doc Link:

Title Description Comments:

Action Type: Response Requested - Workplans
Action Date: 9/27/2001
Received Issue Date: 1/1/1965
Action: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan
Doc Link:

Title Description Comments:

Soil and Water Investigation Workplan
Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions
Action Date: 8/27/2001
Received Issue Date: 8/27/2001
Action: Staff Letter - #32690
Doc Link:

Title Description Comments:

Action Type: Response Requested - Other
Action Date: 5/17/2001
Received Issue Date: 5/17/2001
Action: Correspondence
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608552020&doc_id=5853785 Title Description Comments:

STATE RELATED COORESPONDENCE FROM LUSTOP 06/7/2000-5/17/2001 Action Type: Response Requested - Other
Action Date: 4/19/2000
Received Issue Date: 4/19/2000
Action: Unauthorized Release Form
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608552020&doc_id=5853790 Title Description Comments:

URF
Action Type: Response Requested - Other
Action Date: 8/1/1983
Received Issue Date: 8/1/1983
Action: Other Report / Document
Doc Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents_all?global_id=T0608552020&doc_id=5853783 Title Description Comments:

MAPS METROSCAN FROM LUSTOP
Action Type: Response Requested - Reports
Action Date: 1/18/2013
Received Issue Date:

Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report
Doc Link:

Title Description Comments:

Additional Site Assessment Report and Site Conceptual Model Action Type: Response Requested - Reports
177 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Action Date: 4/30/2015
Received Issue Date:

Action: Monitoring Report - Semi-Annually
Doc Link:

Title Description Comments:

Action Type: Response Requested - Workplans
Action Date: 8/7/2020
Received Issue Date:

Action: Other Workplan
Doc Link:

Title Description Comments:

Additional Site Investigation Work Plan
Action Type: Leak Action
Action Date: 4/19/2000
Received Issue Date:

Action: Leak Reported
Doc Link:

Title Description Comments:

Action Type: Leak Action
Action Date: 7/8/1999
Received Issue Date:

Action: Leak Discovery
Doc Link:

Title Description Comments:

Action Type: Leak Action
Action Date: 7/8/1999
Received Issue Date:

Action: Leak Stopped
Doc Link:

Title Description Comments:

Action Type: Enforcement - Other
Action Date:

Received Issue Date:

Action: Unknown
Doc Link:

Title Description Comments:

Action Type: Enforcement - Other
Action Date:

Received Issue Date:

Action: Unknown
Doc Link:

Title Description Comments:

Action Type: Other Regulatory Actions
Action Date:

Received Issue Date:

Action: Email Correspondence
Doc Link:

Title Description Comments:

LUST Sites from GeoTracker Search - Documents (as of Oct 06, 2020) Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 6/3/2020 Submitted By: TRAVIS FLORA (REGULATOR) 178 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted:

Title: DEH REQUIRES ADDITIONAL SITE INVESTIGATION WORK PLAN Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6437217 Document Type: Site Documents Size : 4,513 KB
Document Date: 4/22/2020 Submitted By: FORREST COOK (AUTH_RP) Type: SOIL AND WATER INVESTIGATION
REPORT
Submitted:

Title: ADDITIONAL SOIL, WATER, AND SOIL GAS INVESTIGATION & LTCP DATA GAP ANALYSIS REPORT Title Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/6554943382/T0608552020.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 1/28/2020 Submitted By: TRAVIS FLORA (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted:

Title: OUT OF COMPLIANCE - FIRST NOTICE
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6425976 Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 8/15/2019 Submitted By: KHRSTINARAE LEYBA (REGULATOR) Type: CLEAN UP FUND - CASE CLOSURE

REVIEW SUMMARY REPORT (RSR)
Submitted:

Title: 15417 1ST RSR RATIONALE ADDITIONAL WORK AUGUST 2019 Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6412723 Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 3/12/2019 Submitted By: TRAVIS FLORA (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted:

Title: DEH REQUESTS ADDITIONAL SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6387817 Document Type: Site Documents Size : 3,794 KB
Document Date: 1/15/2019 Submitted By: BEN HALSTED (AUTH_RP) Type: SOIL AND WATER INVESTIGATION
REPORT
Submitted:

Title: INVESTIGATIVE REPORT
Title Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/1334271371/T0608552020.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 10/9/2018 Submitted By: TRAVIS FLORA (REGULATOR) Type: EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE Submitted:

Title: DEH APPROVES EXTENSION REQUEST
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6371758 Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 1,887 KB
Document Date: 9/6/2018 Submitted By: BEN HALSTED (AUTH_RP) Type: MONITORING REPORT - SEMI-ANNUALLY Submitted:

Title: SEMI-ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT
Title Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/3127447724/T0608552020.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 8/14/2018 Submitted By: TRAVIS FLORA (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted:

Title: DEH CONDITIONALLY APPROVES WORK PLAN
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6366717 Document Type: Site Documents Size : 1,790 KB
Document Date: 8/7/2018 Submitted By: BEN HALSTED (AUTH_RP) Type: SOIL AND WATER INVESTIGATION

WORKPLAN
Submitted:

Title: INVESTIGATIVE WORK PLAN
Title Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/9981940150/T0608552020.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : 621 KB
Document Date: 6/13/2018 Submitted By: BEN HALSTED (AUTH_RP) Type: REMEDIAL PROGRESS REPORT Submitted:

Title: REPORT OF SOIL DISPOSAL
Title Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/1654358148/T0608552020.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size :
179 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Document Date: 6/7/2018 Submitted By: TRAVIS FLORA (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted:

Title: DEH REQUIRES ADDITIONAL DATA GAP WORK PLAN
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6360467 Document Type: Site Documents Size : 3,302 KB
Document Date: 5/25/2018 Submitted By: BEN HALSTED (AUTH_RP) Type: SOIL AND WATER INVESTIGATION
REPORT
Submitted:

Title: INVESTIGATIVE REPORT
Title Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/6817520380/T0608552020.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 1,978 KB
Document Date: 4/13/2018 Submitted By: BEN HALSTED (AUTH_RP) Type: MONITORING REPORT - SEMI-ANNUALLY Submitted:

Title: SEMI-ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT
Title Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/2134146332/T0608552020.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 2/21/2018 Submitted By: TRAVIS FLORA (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted:

Title: DEH REQ. ADDITIONAL SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6349258 Document Type: Site Documents Size : 1,500 KB
Document Date: 2/2/2018 Submitted By: BEN HALSTED (AUTH_RP) Type: SOIL AND WATER INVESTIGATION

WORKPLAN
Submitted:

Title: INVESTIGATIVE WORK PLAN
Title Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/5319424569/T0608552020.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 12/4/2017 Submitted By: TRAVIS FLORA (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted:

Title: DEH CASE REVIEW, AND REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL SITE ASSESSMENT WORK PLAN Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6342494 Document Type: Site Documents Size : 1,891 KB
Document Date: 11/30/2017 Submitted By: BEN HALSTED (AUTH_RP) Type: SITE INVESTIGATION Submitted:

Title: INVETIGATIVE REPORT
Title Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/7163873493/T0608552020.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 10/24/2017 Submitted By: TRAVIS FLORA (REGULATOR) Type: EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE Submitted:

Title: 30-DAY EXTENSION APPROVAL
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6339528 Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 9/8/2017 Submitted By: SOMIRA PECH (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted:

Title: LETTER APPROVAL FOR MW-1990 DESTRUCTION, AND WELL POINT/PIEZOMETER INSTALL Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6335853 Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 1,600 KB
Document Date: 8/11/2017 Submitted By: BEN HALSTED (AUTH_RP) Type: MONITORING REPORT - SEMI-ANNUALLY Submitted:

Title: SEMI-ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT
Title Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/7254945755/T0608552020.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 8/8/2017 Submitted By: SOMIRA PECH (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted:

Title: WELL POINT INSTALLATION APPROVAL
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6329568 Document Type: Site Documents Size : 1,340 KB
Document Date: 7/30/2017 Submitted By: BEN HALSTED (AUTH_RP) 180 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Type: SITE INVESTIGATION Submitted:

Title: INVESTIGATIVE REPORT
Title Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/6821021735/T0608552020.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 5/12/2017 Submitted By: CANDACE GARCIA (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted:

Title: GROUNDWATER MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6319735 Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 1,946 KB
Document Date: 3/27/2017 Submitted By: BEN HALSTED (AUTH_RP) Type: MONITORING REPORT - SEMI-ANNUALLY Submitted:

Title: SEMI-ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT
Title Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/3445884406/T0608552020.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 3/27/2017 Submitted By: CANDACE GARCIA (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted:

Title: WORK PLAN APPROVAL LETTER
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6315237 Document Type: Site Documents Size : 1,398 KB
Document Date: 3/13/2017 Submitted By: BEN HALSTED (AUTH_RP) Type: SITE INVESTIGATION WORKPLAN Submitted:

Title: INVESTIGATIVE WORK PLAN
Title Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/7816932380/T0608552020.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 2/23/2017 Submitted By: CANDACE GARCIA (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted:

Title: LETTER REQUEST FOR WORK PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL SITE ASSESSMENT-LATE Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6312533 Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 10/27/2016 Submitted By: CANDACE GARCIA (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted:

Title: REQUEST FOR WORKPLAN SUBMITTAL
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6302164 Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 1,229 KB
Document Date: 6/30/2016 Submitted By: BEN HALSTED (AUTH_RP) Type: MONITORING REPORT - SEMI-ANNUALLY Submitted:

Title: SEMI-ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT
Title Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/2288405001/T0608552020.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size : 774 KB
Document Date: 10/16/2015 Submitted By: BEN HALSTED (AUTH_RP) Type: INTERIM REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT Submitted:

Title: PERCH WATER COLLECTION SUMP INSTALLATION REPORT
Title Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/2803949713/T0608552020.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 1,493 KB
Document Date: 10/12/2015 Submitted By: BEN HALSTED (AUTH_RP) Type: MONITORING REPORT - SEMI-ANNUALLY Submitted:

Title: SEMI-ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT
Title Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/5813331365/T0608552020.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 9/24/2015 Submitted By: CANDACE GARCIA (REGULATOR) Type: NOTICE TO COMPLY Submitted:

Title: UNKNOWN
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6261480 Document Type: Site Documents Size : 1,361 KB
Document Date: 6/1/2015 Submitted By: BEN HALSTED (AUTH_RP) Type: SITE INVESTIGATION Submitted:

Title: INVESTIGATIVE REPORT
Title Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/4614920914/T0608552020.PDF 181 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 1/22/2015 Submitted By: CHRIS WIDMANN (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted:

Title: UNKNOWN
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6233861 Document Type: Site Documents Size : 1,391 KB
Document Date: 1/8/2015 Submitted By: BEN HALSTED (AUTH_RP) Type: SITE INVESTIGATION Submitted:

Title: INVESTIGATIVE REPORT
Title Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/8319862127/T0608552020.PDF Document Type: Monitoring Reports Size : 1,441 KB
Document Date: 10/2/2014 Submitted By: BEN HALSTED (AUTH_RP) Type: MONITORING REPORT - SEMI-ANNUALLY Submitted:

Title: SEMI-ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT
Title Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/7833047091/T0608552020.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 9/11/2014 Submitted By: RINA BANKS (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted:

Title: UNKNOWN
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6220246 Document Type: Site Documents Size : 779 KB
Document Date: 9/5/2014 Submitted By: BEN HALSTED (AUTH_RP) Type: SITE INVESTIGATION WORKPLAN Submitted:

Title: INVESTIGATIVE WORK PLAN
Title Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/9886919140/T0608552020.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 3/5/2014 Submitted By: CANDACE GARCIA (REGULATOR) Type: SOIL AND WATER INVESTIGATION
REPORT
Submitted:

Title: GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT REPORT
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&document_id=5853788 Document Type: Site Documents Size : 1,660 KB
Document Date: 2/12/2014 Submitted By: BEN HALSTED (AUTH_RP) Type: SOIL AND WATER INVESTIGATION
REPORT
Submitted:

Title: INVESTIGATIVE REPORT
Title Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/8682817578/T0608552020.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 8/21/2013 Submitted By: CANDACE GARCIA (REGULATOR) Type: CORRESPONDENCE Submitted:

Title: CORRESPONDENCE FILE FROM LUSTOP 08/27/2001-8/21/2013 Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&document_id=5853782 Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 8/21/2013 Submitted By: CHRIS WIDMANN (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted:

Title: WP APPROVAL
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6172306 Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 8/21/2013 Submitted By: CANDACE GARCIA (REGULATOR) Type: CORRESPONDENCE Submitted:

Title: CORRESPONDENCE FILE FROM LUSTOP 08/27/2001-8/21/2013 - REGULATOR RESPONSE Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&document_id=5853782 Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 8/12/2013 Submitted By: CANDACE GARCIA (REGULATOR) Type: PROPOSED PLAN Submitted:

Title: WORKPLAN
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&document_id=5853793 182 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Document Type: Site Documents Size : 731 KB
Document Date: 8/12/2013 Submitted By: BEN HALSTED (AUTH_RP) Type: SOIL AND WATER INVESTIGATION

WORKPLAN
Submitted:

Title: INVESTIGATIVE WORKPLAN
Title Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/8592423915/T0608552020.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 6/28/2013 Submitted By: CHRIS WIDMANN (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted:

Title: UNKNOWN
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6165162 Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 6/17/2013 Submitted By: CANDACE GARCIA (REGULATOR) Type: SOIL AND WATER INVESTIGATION
REPORT
Submitted:

Title: GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT REPORT
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&document_id=5853787 Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 5/23/2013 Submitted By: CHRIS WIDMANN (REGULATOR) Type: NOTICE TO COMPLY Submitted:

Title: OUT OF COMPLIANCE LETTER
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6160040 Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 1/10/2013 Submitted By: CANDACE GARCIA (REGULATOR) Type: VERBAL COMMUNICATION Submitted:

Title: PHONE LOG FROM LUSTROP 1/10/2013
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&document_id=5853784 Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 9/20/2012 Submitted By: CHRIS WIDMANN (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted:

Title: CONDITIONAL WORK PLAN APPROVAL
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6138344 Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 8/30/2012 Submitted By: CANDACE GARCIA (REGULATOR) Type: PROPOSED PLAN Submitted:

Title: WORKPLAN
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&document_id=5853792 Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 7/13/2012 Submitted By: CHRIS WIDMANN (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted:

Title: REQUEST FOR WORK PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL SITE ASSESSMENT Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6130198 Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 3/17/2011 Submitted By: (REGULATOR)
Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted:

Title: LATE LETTER FOR SUBMITTAL
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6080852 Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 10/19/2009 Submitted By: CANDACE GARCIA (REGULATOR) Type: SOIL AND WATER INVESTIGATION
REPORT
Submitted:

Title: GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT REPORT
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&document_id=5853786 Document Type: Site Documents Size : 783 KB
Document Date: 10/16/2009 Submitted By: BEN HALSTED (AUTH_RP) Type: SOIL AND WATER INVESTIGATION
REPORT
Submitted:

Title: SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATIVE REPORT
Title Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/6344632983/T0608552020.PDF 183 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 9/29/2009 Submitted By: CANDACE GARCIA (REGULATOR) Type: SOIL AND WATER INVESTIGATION
REPORT
Submitted:

Title: GR
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&document_id=5853789 Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 7/14/2009 Submitted By: KRISTI CONG (REGULATOR) Type: STAFF LETTER Submitted:

Title: WORKPLAN APPROVAL
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6020604 Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 4/29/2009 Submitted By: CANDACE GARCIA (REGULATOR) Type: PROPOSED PLAN Submitted:

Title: WORKPLAN
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&document_id=5853791 Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 4/16/2009 Submitted By: KRISTI CONG (REGULATOR) Type: WARNING LETTER Submitted:

Title: 2ND LATE LTR 2735 DAYS LATE; PSA WP
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&enforcement_id=6010264 Document Type: Site Documents Size : 2,723 KB
Document Date: 4/9/2009 Submitted By: BEN HALSTED (AUTH_RP) Type: SOIL AND WATER INVESTIGATION

WORKPLAN
Submitted:

Title: INVESTIGATIVE WORKPLAN
Title Link: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/6865470230/T0608552020.PDF Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 5/17/2001 Submitted By: CANDACE GARCIA (REGULATOR) Type: CORRESPONDENCE Submitted:

Title: STATE RELATED COORESPONDENCE FROM LUSTOP 06/7/2000-5/17/2001 Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&document_id=5853785 Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 4/19/2000 Submitted By: CANDACE GARCIA (REGULATOR) Type: UNAUTHORIZED RELEASE FORM Submitted:

Title: URF
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&document_id=5853790 Document Type: Site Documents Size :

Document Date: 8/1/1983 Submitted By: CANDACE GARCIA (REGULATOR) Type: OTHER REPORT / DOCUMENT Submitted:

Title: MAPS METROSCAN FROM LUSTOP
Title Link: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/view_documents?global_id=T0608552020&document_id=5853783 m-29-820297021-b 1 of 3 WNW 0.50 /
2,640.48

2.18 /
-10

ALVISO INDEPENDENT OIL CO
1110 TAYLOR ST
ALVISO CA 950020000
p1p-820297021-y1y
Estor/EPA ID: 80001742 Assembly District: 25
Site Code: Senate District: 10
Nat Priority List: NO Permit Renewal Lead:

APN: NONE SPECIFIED Public Partici Spclst:

Census Tract: 6085504602 Project Manager:

Site Type: CORRECTIVE ACTION County: SANTA CLARA
Address Description: 1110 TAYLOR ST Latitude: 37.426065 Office: CLEANUP BERKELEY Longitude: -121.975948
Special Program: Acres: 0 ACRES
Funding: Supervisor: MARK PIROS
Cleanup Status: INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF 6/22/2009 Cleanup Oversight Agencies: NONE SPECIFIED
School District:
29 ENVIROSTOR
184 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Past Use that Caused Contam: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Contamin of Concern:

NONE SPECIFIED
Site History:

Status: INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION
A2 Program Type: CORRECTIVE ACTION
CalEnviroScreen Score: 81-85%
Summary Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=80001742 m-29-820356990-b 2 of 3 WNW 0.50 /
2,640.48

2.18 /
-10

ALVISO INDEPENDENT OIL CO
1110 TAYLOR ST
ALVISO CA 950020000
p1p-820356990-y1y
Estor/EPA ID: CAD980695340 Permit Renewal Lead:

Site Code: Project Manager:

Nat Priority List: Supervisor:

Acres: Public Partici Spclst:

Special Program: Census Tract:

Funding: County: SANTA CLARA
Assembly District: 25 Latitude: 37.426065
Senate District: 10 Longitude: -121.975948
School District:

APN:

Cleanup Status:

Cleanup Oversight Agencies:

Site Type: CLOSED
Office:

Past Use that Caused Contam:

Potential Media Affected:

Potential Contamin of Concern:

Site History:

This facility is a duplicate of CAL000161743, which was a permitted facility and is now undergoing closure. This facility is therefore being administrative closed due to being a duplicate.

Status: CLOSED
Program Type: HAZ WASTE - RCRA
CalEnviroScreen Score: 81-85%
Summary Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/hwmp_profile_report?global_id=CAD980695340 Permit Units - Completed Activities
Unit: NO PERMIT ACTIVITIES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED FOR THIS SITE Event Description:

Date:

Doc Link:

Units Undergoing Closure
Unit: UNIT1
Event Description: CLOSURE ADMINISTRATIVE - ISSUE CLOSURE VERIFICATION Date: 10/18/2017
Doc Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/hwmp_final_documents? global_id=CAD980695340&link_key=782&document_category=CLOSURE+VERIFICATION&event_description=Cl osure+Administrative+%2D+ISSUE+CLOSURE+VERIFICATION+&mytype=pa m-29-846769085-b 3 of 3 WNW 0.50 /
2,640.48

2.18 /
-10

ALVISO INDEPENDENT OIL CO
1110 TAYLOR ST
ALVISO CA 950020000
p1p-846769085-y1y
29 29
HWP

ENVIROSTOR
185 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Estor/EPA ID: CAD980695340 Assembly District: 25
Site Code: Senate District: 10
Nat Priority List: Permit Renewal Lead:

APN: Public Partici Spclst:

Census Tract: Project Manager:

Site Type: CLOSED County: SANTA CLARA
Address Description: 1110 TAYLOR ST Latitude: 37.426065 Office: Longitude: -121.975948
Special Program: Acres:

Funding: Supervisor:

Cleanup Status:

Cleanup Oversight Agencies:

School District:

Past Use that Caused Contam:

Potential Media Affected:

Potential Contamin of Concern:

Site History:

This facility is a duplicate of CAL000161743, which was a permitted facility and is now undergoing closure. This facility is therefore being administrative closed due to being a duplicate.

Status: CLOSED
A2 Program Type: HAZ WASTE - RCRA
CalEnviroScreen Score: 81-85%
Summary Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/hwmp_profile_report?global_id=CAD980695340 Permit Units - Completed Activities
Unit: NO PERMIT ACTIVITIES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED FOR THIS SITE Event Description:

Date:

Doc Link:

2.20 /
-10

ALVISO INDEPENDENT OIL

COMPANY
1110 TAYLOR
ALVISO CA 95002
p1p-810471758-y1y
EPA Handler ID: CAD980695340
Gen Status Universe: Small Quantity Generator
Contact Name: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER
Contact Address: 1110 TAYLOR , , ALVISO , CA, 95002 , US Contact Phone No and Ext: 408-262-2715
Contact Email:

Contact Country: US
County Name: SANTA CLARA
EPA Region: 09
Land Type: Other
Receive Date: 19900403
Location Latitude: 37.426233
Location Longitude: -121.975916
Event/Area Details
30 RCRA

CORRACTS
186 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Area Name: ENTIRE FACILITY
Event Code:

Corrective Action Event Descri:

Actual Date of Event:

Orig Sched Event Date:

New Sched Event Date:

Best Date:

Groundwater Release Indicator:

Soil Release Indicator:

Air Release Indicator:

Surface Waste Release Ind:

Event Responsible Agency:

Violation/Evaluation Summary
Note: NO RECORDS: As of Jan 2021, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID).

Handler Summary
Importer Activity: No
Mixed Waste Generator: No
Transporter Activity: No
Transfer Facility: No
Onsite Burner: No
Smelting, Melting and Refining: No
Underground Injection Control: No
Commercial TSD: No
Used Oil Transporter: No
Used Oil Transfer Facility: No
Used Oil Processor: No
Used Oil Refiner: No
Used Oil Burner: No
Used Oil Market Burner: No
Used Oil Spec Marketer: No
Hazardous Waste Handler Details
Sequence No: 1
Receive Date: 19900403
Handler Name: ALVISO INDEPENDENT OIL COMPANY
Federal Waste Generator Code: 2
Generator Code Description: Small Quantity Generator
Source Type: Notification
Owner/Operator Details
Owner/Operator Ind: Current Operator Street No:

Type: Private Street 1: NOT REQUIRED
Name: NOT REQUIRED Street 2:

Date Became Current: City: NOT REQUIRED
Date Ended Current: State: ME
Phone: 415-555-1212 Country:

Source Type: Notification Zip Code: 99999
Owner/Operator Ind: Current Owner Street No:

Type: Private Street 1: NOT REQUIRED
Name: LARRY EVANS Street 2:

Date Became Current: City: NOT REQUIRED
Date Ended Current: State: ME
Phone: 415-555-1212 Country:

Source Type: Notification Zip Code: 99999
187 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
m-31-824925481-b 1 of 1 E 0.55 /
2,910.14

6.83 /
-5

SILICON GENESIS CORPORATION
145 BAYTECH DRIVE
SAN JOSE CA 95134
p1p-824925481-y1y
Estor/EPA ID: 60002120 Assembly District: 25
Site Code: Senate District: 10
Nat Priority List: NO Permit Renewal Lead:

APN: NONE SPECIFIED Public Partici Spclst:

Census Tract: 6085504602 Project Manager:

Site Type: TIERED PERMIT County: SANTA CLARA
Address Description: 145 BAYTECH DRIVE Latitude: 37.422279 Office: CLEANUP BERKELEY Longitude: -121.956102
Special Program: Acres: 0.3 ACRES
Funding: RESPONSIBLE PARTY Supervisor: JULIE PETTIJOHN
Cleanup Status: INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF 2/28/2020 Cleanup Oversight Agencies: DTSC - HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM - LEAD AGENCY School District:

Past Use that Caused Contam: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Contamin of Concern:

NONE SPECIFIED
Site History:

I see no evidence that DTSC referred this back to Santa Clara county. Therefore marking this site as inactive-needs evaluation based on a review of the documentation, JP 2/28/2020.

Status: INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION
A2 Program Type: TIERED PERMIT
CalEnviroScreen Score: 81-85%
Summary Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=60002120 Completed Activities
Title: Tiered Permitting Phase I Environmental Assessment Checklist Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60002120&doc_id=60386137 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Phase 1
Date Completed: 11/17/2014
Comments:
m-32-820299243-b 1 of 1 SSE 0.68 /
3,587.96

9.33 /
-3
ITALIX CO., INC.
2232 CALLE DEL MUNDO
SANTA CLARA CA 95054
p1p-820299243-y1y
Estor/EPA ID: 71002788 Assembly District: 25
Site Code: Senate District: 10
Nat Priority List: NO Permit Renewal Lead:

APN: NONE SPECIFIED Public Partici Spclst:

Census Tract: 6085505001 Project Manager:

Site Type: TIERED PERMIT County: SANTA CLARA
Address Description: 2232 CALLE DEL MUNDO Latitude: 37.4100449 Office: CLEANUP BERKELEY Longitude: -121.9638376
Special Program: Acres: NONE SPECIFIED
Funding: Supervisor:

Cleanup Status: INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF
Cleanup Oversight Agencies: NONE SPECIFIED
School District:

Past Use that Caused Contam: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Contamin of Concern:
31 32

ENVIROSTOR

ENVIROSTOR
188 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB

NONE SPECIFIED
Site History:

9.21 /
-3
NU-METAL FINISHING, INC.
2262 CALLE DEL MUNDO
SANTA CLARA CA 95054
p1p-820296039-y1y
Estor/EPA ID: 71002694 Assembly District: 25
Site Code: Senate District: 10
Nat Priority List: NO Permit Renewal Lead:

APN: NONE SPECIFIED Public Partici Spclst:

Census Tract: 6085505001 Project Manager:

Site Type: TIERED PERMIT County: SANTA CLARA
Address Description: 2262 CALLE DEL MUNDO Latitude: 37.409768 Office: CLEANUP BERKELEY Longitude: -121.964643
Special Program: Acres: NONE SPECIFIED
Funding: Supervisor:

Cleanup Status: INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF
Cleanup Oversight Agencies: NONE SPECIFIED
School District:

Past Use that Caused Contam: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Contamin of Concern:

NONE SPECIFIED
Site History:

Status: INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION
A2 Program Type: TIERED PERMIT
CalEnviroScreen Score: 46-50%
Summary Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=71002694 Completed Activities
Title: Phase I Environmental Assessment Checklist
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=71002694&doc_id=60414554 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Phase 1
Date Completed: 8/22/2016
Comments: Based on the owner's certification, no action is required. DTSC has not validated this information. m-34-820299848-b 1 of 1 SE 0.72 /
3,799.21

12.41 /
0 SUPERTEX
71 VISTA MONTANA
SAN JOSE CA 95134
p1p-820299848-y1y
Estor/EPA ID: 71003060 Assembly District: 25
Site Code: Senate District: 10
Nat Priority List: NO Permit Renewal Lead:

APN: NONE SPECIFIED Public Partici Spclst:

Census Tract: 6085505009 Project Manager:

Site Type: TIERED PERMIT County: SANTA CLARA
Address Description: 71 VISTA MONTANA Latitude: 37.4135459 Office: CLEANUP BERKELEY Longitude: -121.956562
Special Program: Acres: NONE SPECIFIED
33 34

ENVIROSTOR

ENVIROSTOR
189 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Funding: Supervisor:

Cleanup Status: REFER: OTHER AGENCY AS OF
Cleanup Oversight Agencies: NONE SPECIFIED
School District:

Past Use that Caused Contam: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Contamin of Concern:

NONE SPECIFIED
Site History:

Status: REFER: OTHER AGENCY
A2 Program Type: TIERED PERMIT
CalEnviroScreen Score: 61-65%
Summary Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=71003060 m-35-866002548-b 1 of 1 SE 0.72 /
3,813.68

12.51 /
0 71 VISTA MONTANA
71 VISTA MONTANA
SAN JOSE CA 95134
p1p-866002548-y1y
Estor/EPA ID: 60000591 Assembly District: 25
Site Code: 201738 Senate District: 10
Nat Priority List: NO Permit Renewal Lead:

APN: 097-52-027 Public Partici Spclst:

Census Tract: 6085505009 Project Manager:

Site Type: VOLUNTARY CLEANUP County: SANTA CLARA
Address Description: 71 VISTA MONTANA Latitude: 37.4135150082989 Office: CLEANUP BERKELEY Longitude: -121.95652828226
Special Program: Acres: 4.21 ACRES
Funding: SITE PROPONENT Supervisor: MARK PIROS
Cleanup Status: INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF 8/1/2008 Cleanup Oversight Agencies: DTSC - SITE CLEANUP PROGRAM - LEAD AGENCY School District:

Past Use that Caused Contam: AGRICULTURAL - ORCHARD, AGRICULTURAL - ROW CROPS Potential Media Affected: SOIL
Site History:

DTSC received a Request for Agency Oversight Application for the Site in February 2007 and prepared a Voluntary Cleanup Agreement (VCA) with Sobrato Development Companies (Sobrato) to oversee further investigation and cleanup of the Site. Sobrato did not enter into the VCA or proceed with further investigation and cleanup. A January 2007 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for the Site indicates there were conceptual plans for high density residential development of the Site. During historical soil sampling, DDT, DDD, DDE, arsenic, and lead were detected in soil above residential screening levels and were attributed to the former agricultural use of the Site. Supertex began operating on the Site in 1999 and manufactured semiconductor components. In a February 18, 2016 letter to Supertex, the County of Santa Clara Department of Environmental Health acknowledged the closure of the facility. The Phase I ESA Report noted no significant concerns were identified regarding hazardous materials use and storage at the Supertex facility. The building where Supertex operated remains on the Site and the Site has not been redeveloped.

Potential Contamin of Concern:

ARSENIC, DDD, DDE, DDT, DIELDRIN
Status: INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION
A2 Program Type: VOLUNTARY CLEANUP
CalEnviroScreen Score: 61-65%
Summary Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=60000591 Completed Activities
Title: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000591&doc_id=60452867 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Phase 1
Date Completed: 1/23/2007
35 ENVIROSTOR
190 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Comments: This Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report was submitted along with the Request for Agency Oversight Application that DTSC received from PES Environmental on behalf of Sobrato Development Companies. DTSC did not oversee the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment.

Title: Santa Clara County Letter to Supertex Inc. - Response to Closure of PBR Unit Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000591&enforcement_id=60406046 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Correspondence
Date Completed: 2/18/2016
Comments: The County of Santa Clara Hazardous Materials Compliance Division acknowledged receiving the final closure package for the Permit by Rule unit at the Supertex facility, and concluded the treatment operation was closed as of February 9, 2016 and is no longer subject to the operating standards of Permit by Rule. m-36-820299366-b 1 of 1 SE 0.74 /
3,888.46

12.72 /
1 AKASHIC MEMORIES CORP., SAN
JOSE
305 W. TASMAN DRIVE
SAN JOSE CA 95134
p1p-820299366-y1y
Estor/EPA ID: 71003087 Assembly District: 25
Site Code: Senate District: 10
Nat Priority List: NO Permit Renewal Lead:

APN: NONE SPECIFIED Public Partici Spclst:

Census Tract: 6085505009 Project Manager:

Site Type: TIERED PERMIT County: SANTA CLARA
Address Description: 305 W. TASMAN DRIVE Latitude: 37.412018 Office: CLEANUP BERKELEY Longitude: -121.957761
Special Program: Acres: NONE SPECIFIED
Funding: Supervisor:

Cleanup Status: INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF
Cleanup Oversight Agencies: NONE SPECIFIED
School District:

Past Use that Caused Contam: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Contamin of Concern:

NONE SPECIFIED
Site History:

Status: INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION
A2 Program Type: TIERED PERMIT
CalEnviroScreen Score: 61-65%
Summary Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=71003087 m-37-878648277-b 1 of 1 ESE 0.74 /
3,889.76

12.26 /
0 VISTA MONTANA PARK
4145 N. 1ST STREET
SAN JOSE CA 95134
p1p-878648277-y1y
Estor/EPA ID: 60000294 Assembly District: 25
Site Code: 201657, 202049, 202331 Senate District: 10
Nat Priority List: NO Permit Renewal Lead:

APN: 097-52-013, 097-52-028, 097-52-029, 097-52-
041, 097-52-042, 097-53-015, 09752013,
09752028, 09752029, 09753015
Public Partici Spclst:

Census Tract: 6085505009 Project Manager: JOVANNE VILLAMATER Site Type: VOLUNTARY CLEANUP County: SANTA CLARA
Address Description: 4145 N. 1ST STREET Latitude: 37.4147563182448 Office: CLEANUP BERKELEY Longitude: -121.955296943667
Special Program: VOLUNTARY CLEANUP PROGRAM Acres: 20.75 ACRES Funding: SITE PROPONENT Supervisor: CHERYL PROWELL
Cleanup Status: ACTIVE AS OF 9/11/2006
Cleanup Oversight Agencies: DTSC - SITE CLEANUP PROGRAM - LEAD AGENCY School District:

Past Use that Caused Contam: AGRICULTURAL - ORCHARD
36 37

ENVIROSTOR

ENVIROSTOR
191 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Potential Media Affected: SOIL
Potential Contamin of Concern:

ARSENIC, DDT, LEAD
Site History:

The site was used as an orchard beginning before 1939. In the 1980s, office buildings were constructed at the site and occupied by various electronics and semiconductor manufacturing companies. Environmental site assessments have identified pesticide, arsenic, and lead impacts to shallow soil at the site. No impacts to groundwater have been detected.

The various parcels that comprise the project site have been redeveloped with different uses:
-Parcel C (4041 North First Street) has been developed into a public park, which is overseen by DTSC for ongoing operation and maintenance activities, including the annual inspection and maintenance of the surface to ensure underlying impacted soils remain are not accessed. -Parcel A (4145 North First Street and 55 Vista Montana) has been developed into a multifamily residential complex. DTSC will oversee ongoing operation and maintenance activities, which will include the annual inspection and maintenance of the surface cap and on-site buildings, to ensure underlying impacted soils remain are not accessed.
-Parcel B1/B2 (81 Vista Montana and 305 Tasman Drive) has been developed into a multifamily residential complex, small public park, and public right of way street. DTSC will oversee ongoing operation and maintenance activities, which will include the annual inspection and maintenance of the surface cap and on-site buildings containing subterranean parking, to ensure underlying impacted soils are not accessed.

JV 08-2018
Status: ACTIVE - LAND USE RESTRICTIONS
A2 Program Type: VOLUNTARY CLEANUP
CalEnviroScreen Score: 61-65%
Summary Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=60000294 Land Use Restrictions
Site Management
Requirements:

LAND USE COVENANT

NO EXCAVATION OF CONTAMINATED SOILS WITHOUT AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVAL

NO EXCAVATION OR ACTIVITIES WHICH DISTURB THE SOIL BELOW A SPECIFIED DEPTH (SEE

COVENANT FOR DEPTH) WITHOUT AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF A SOIL MANAGEMENT PLAN Title: Land Use Restriction - Parcel B1/B2 Park Area
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/view_document? docurl=/public/deliverable_documents/4804766595/Vista%20Montana%20B1%5FB2%20Park%20LUC%20%2D% 20Conformed%20Copy%2Epdf
Date Recorded: 6/26/2017
Site Management
Requirements:

NONE SPECIFIED
Title: Land Use Restriction (Parcel A)
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/view_document? docurl=/public/deliverable_documents/7740020573/VMP%20Parcel%20A%20Domain%5FRecorded%20LUC% 2Epdf
Date Recorded: 4/5/2019
Site Management
Requirements:

DAY CARE CENTER PROHIBITED

ELDER CARE CENTER PROHIBITED

HOSPITAL USE PROHIBITED

LAND USE COVENANT

NO EXCAVATION OR ACTIVITIES WHICH DISTURB THE SOIL BELOW A SPECIFIED DEPTH (SEE

COVENANT FOR DEPTH) WITHOUT AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF A SOIL MANAGEMENT PLAN

NOTIFY PRIOR TO CHANGE IN LAND USE
PUBLIC OR PRIVATE SCHOOL FOR PERSONS UNDER 21 PROHIBITED

RAISING OF FOOD PROHIBITED
Title: Land Use Restriction (Parcel C)
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/view_document? docurl=/public/deliverable_documents/3270370304/Vista%20Montana%20Land%20Use%20Covenant%20% 20Agreement%20recorded%2Epdf
Date Recorded: 9/3/2015
Currently Scheduled Activities
Area Name: City Parcels
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1971540&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True 192 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: 5 Year Review Reports
Due Date: 4/28/2021
Revised Date:

Future Activities
Area Name: Parcel B1/B2
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970989&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area: Public Street (Orchard Way)
Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Land Use Restriction
Due Date: 2021
Area Name: Parcel A
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970988&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: 5 Year Review Reports
Due Date: 2026
Area Name: Parcel A
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970988&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: 5 Year Review Reports
Due Date: 2021
Area Name: Parcel B1/B2
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970989&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area: Residential Development
Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Certification
Due Date: 2021
Area Name: City Parcels
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1971540&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: 5 Year Review Reports
Due Date: 2026
Area Name: Parcel B1/B2
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970989&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area: Residential Development
Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Land Use Restriction
Due Date: 2021
Area Name: Parcel B1/B2
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970989&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area: Public Street (Orchard Way)
Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Certification
Due Date: 2022
Completed Activities
Title: Annual Cost Estimate for 2020-2021
193 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&enforcement_id=60487444 Area Name: Parcel B1/B2
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970989&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 10/5/2020
Comments: Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, Annual Cost Estimate transmitted via email on 10/05/2020.

Title: Annual Cost Estimate for 2020-2021 (City of San Jose) Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&enforcement_id=60487443 Area Name: City Parcels
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1971540&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 10/5/2020
Comments: Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, Annual Cost Estimate transmitted via email on 10/05/2020.

Title: Land Use Restriction (Parcel A)
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&enforcement_id=60306345 Area Name: Parcel A
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970988&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Land Use Restriction
Date Completed: 4/5/2019
Comments: The Land Use Covenant between DTSC and Vista Montana Park Holdings LLC prohibits single-family residences, hospitals, schools for people under 18 years of age, and day care centers for children on the Site without prior written approval from DTSC. Disturbance of soils below constructed site cap is prohibited without a Soil Management Plan approved by DTSC.

Land Use Covenant signed by DTSC on 04/04/2019; Recorded by the Santa Clara County Assessor on 04/05/2019.

Title: Removal Action Completion Report for Parcel B1/B2 Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&doc_id=60336105 Area Name: Parcel B1/B2
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970989&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Removal Action Completion Report
Date Completed: 6/16/2017
Comments: The Completion Report details installation of the cap at Parcels B1 and B2. Both parcels were redeveloped collectively as a multi-unit residential complex; a public right of way/street; and small park. Individual Land Use Covenants (LUCs), Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Plans and Agreements will be developed for each of the three areas separately, and the Parcel B1/B2 site certified once all LUCs and O&M Agreements have been executed.

Title: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate for Parcels A and B1/B2 for 2016-2017 Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&enforcement_id=60414305 Area Name: Parcel A
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970988&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 9/30/2016
Comments: DTSC letter with oversight cost estimate for fiscal year 2016/2017 Title: 2016 Annual Inspection Report - Operation and Maintenance Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&doc_id=60400698 Area Name: Parcel C
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970990&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area:
194 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Land Use Restriction Monitoring Report
Date Completed: 9/14/2016
Comments:

Title: Operation and Maintenance Plan for Parcel A
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&doc_id=60417213 Area Name: Parcel A
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970988&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Operations and Maintenance Plan
Date Completed: 4/11/2016
Comments: The Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Plan outlines the cap inspection, maintenance, and reporting for Parcel A.

The cap consists of building foundations, pavement/asphalt, and landscaped areas with 2 feet clean soil cover.

Annual inspections and reporting are required. The O&M Plan was included as Appendix F of and approved as part of the Removal Action Completion Report.O&M Plan.

Title: Removal Action Completion Report for Parcel A
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&doc_id=60306334 Area Name: Parcel A
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970988&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Removal Action Completion Report
Date Completed: 4/11/2016
Comments:

Title: Certification for Parcel C
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&enforcement_id=60306347 Area Name: Parcel C
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970990&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Certification
Date Completed: 9/15/2015
Comments: DTSC certified the completion of the removal action at the Parcel C Operable Unit. Parcel C has been developed into a public park. A clean cap of varying thickness and materials (depending on use within the park) spans the entire parcel to prevent human contact with soil containing elevated levels of arsenic. Operation and maintenance to preserve the cap integrity will be implemented under an Operation and Maintenance Agreement between the City of San Jose, Equity Residential (developer), and DTSC. A Land Use Covenant restricting sensitive uses on Parcel C was recorded with the Santa Clara County Assessors Office on 09/03/2015.

Title: RAW Fieldwork - Implement Parcel C Fieldwork
Title Link:

Area Name: Parcel C
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970990&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Fieldwork
Date Completed: 10/3/2014
Comments: Site construction activities and the capping of Parcel C were completed.

Title: RAW Phase 1A Implementation (Parcel A)
Title Link:

Area Name: Parcel A
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970988&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Fieldwork
Date Completed: 6/1/2012
Comments: Earth-moving activities completed at site; construction of on-site buildings and installation of hardscape cap to commence in Fall 2012.

Title: Fact Sheet/Work Notice for VMP Parcels A and C
195 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&doc_id=60270206 Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Work Notice
Date Completed: 7/8/2011
Comments: Fact Sheet/Work Notice sent out to mailing list providing notification of fieldwork for Removal Action Workplan implementation to begin on July 18, 2011.

Title: 2019 Annual Inspection Report - Parcel C & Parcel B1/B2 Park Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&doc_id=60465230 Area Name: City Parcels
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1971540&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Land Use Restriction Monitoring Report
Date Completed: 9/15/2020
Comments: Park caps at Parcel C and Parcel B1/B2 in tact. Current Land use allowed per Land Use Covenant.

Title: 2017 Annual Inspection Report - Parcel C
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&doc_id=60400702 Area Name: Parcel C
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970990&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Land Use Restriction Monitoring Report
Date Completed: 3/9/2018
Comments: City of San Jose staff performed an annual inspection of the Vista Montana Community Park - Parcel C on December 19, 2017 and submitted an inspection report to DTSC. The Site cap was observed to be in good condition, and compliance with the restrictions and requirements of the land use covenant was verified. Parcel C remains as open park area.

Title: 2017 Annual Inspection Report - Land Use Covenant Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&doc_id=60400700 Area Name: Parcel C
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970990&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Land Use Restriction Monitoring Report
Date Completed: 4/3/2017
Comments: City of San Jose Environmental Services Department staff performed an annual inspection at Parcel C to verify compliance with the Land Use Covenant and the integrity of the cap. No violations of the Land Use Covenant were identified and the site cap was observed to be in good condition with no disturbances. A park continues to operate on Parcel C (allowable use per the Land Use Covenant),
Title: 2015-2016 Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&enforcement_id=60398580 Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 10/7/2015
Comments:

Title: Soil Management Plan
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&doc_id=60391551 Area Name: Parcel C
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970990&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Soils Management Plan
Date Completed: 4/17/2015
Comments: The Soil Management Plan addresses proper handling and management of potentially impacted soils encountered during any future utility work or special construction work that would disturb soil beneath the constructed cap on 196 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Parcel C.

Title: Public Notice for the Explanation of Significant Differences for the Removal Action Workplan Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&doc_id=60331681 Area Name: Parcel B1/B2
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970989&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Public Notice
Date Completed: 11/20/2013
Comments: Public Notice published in San Jose Mercury News (English) and El Observador (Spanish).

Title: RAW Fieldwork - Implement Parcel B1/B2 Fieldwork Title Link:

Area Name: Parcel B1/B2
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970989&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Fieldwork
Date Completed: 9/9/2016
Comments: Cap construction was completed, except for some landscape planting and irrigation installation at the park area.

The cap was constructed to prevent site users from being exposed to underlying arsenic-impacted soil.

Title: Public Notice
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&doc_id=6015577 Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Public Notice
Date Completed: 10/12/2007
Comments: Public comment period set to begin 10/18/2007.

Title: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate for 2018-2019 (City of San Jose) Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&enforcement_id=60450537 Area Name: City Parcels
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1971540&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 10/4/2018
Comments: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate sent 10/04/2018.

Title: Operation & Maintenance Agreement for Parcel B1/B2 Park Area Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&enforcement_id=60336108 Area Name: Parcel B1/B2
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970989&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area: Park Area
Sub Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=60000294&site_id=2010294 Document Type: Operation & Maintenance Order/Agreement
Date Completed: 9/14/2017
Comments: Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement between Equity Residential, the City of San Jose, and DTSC. No financial assurance required is required by the O&M Agreement--City of San Jose is a local government agency, and is exempt. The O&M Agreement covers cap maintenance and DTSC oversight for the Parcel B1/B2 Park Area, which is a small portion of the larger Vista Montana Park site. Certification of the Public Street and Residential Portion of the Parcel B1/B2 will be handled separately.

Title: Removal Action Workplan
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&doc_id=6012015 Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Removal Action Workplan
Date Completed: 5/9/2008
197 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Comments: DTSC approved Final RAW on 5/9/2008.

Title: Fact Sheet
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&doc_id=6015576 Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Fact Sheets
Date Completed: 10/12/2007
Comments: Public comment period set to begin 10/18/2007.

Title: Land Use Restriction - Parcel B1/B2 Park Area
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&enforcement_id=60336107 Area Name: Parcel B1/B2
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970989&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area: Park Area
Sub Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=60000294&site_id=2010294 Document Type: Land Use Restriction
Date Completed: 6/26/2017
Comments: Land Use Covenant for Santa Clara County Assessor Parcel Number 097-52-042 (new parcel, portion of Parcel B1/B2 Operable Unit). Parcel is now a children's park (tot-lot), A two foot thick cap covers the parcel. The Land Use Covenant includes a prohibition on sensitive land uses, requires a DTSC-approved Soil Management Plan for disturbance of impacted soil underlying the cap, and includes a prohibition on drilling for water/oil/gas. The parcel is to be maintained by the City of San Jose.

Signed by DTSC on 06/23/2017; Recorded with the Santa Clara County Assessor on 06/26/2017.

Title: CEQA Responsible Agency Checklist
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&enforcement_id=60333836 Area Name: Parcel B1/B2
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970989&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: CEQA - Responsible Agency Review
Date Completed: 10/25/2013
Comments: The City of San Jose is the lead CEQA agency for the cleanup and development project at the Site. The City prepared and approved an EIR and two addenda to the EIR for the project. Based the evaluation in the Responsible Agency checklist, DTSC concurred with the City's findings in its CEQA documents pertaining to the remedy modification made through the Explanation of Significant Differences.

Title: Parcel C Addendum to RAW - Redesign of Cap Construction Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&enforcement_id=60339503 Area Name: Parcel C
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970990&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Correspondence
Date Completed: 7/18/2013
Comments: The construction design of Parcel C will be redesigned, within the design concessions agreed upon by the City of San Jose (Letter dated April 17, 2013.) Instead of an at-grade 2-foot clean cap across the entirety of Parcel C, clean import fill will be brought to Parcel C to raise the grade. All landscaped areas and utility corridors will have at least 2 feet clean fill; asphalt-paved areas will not be required to have 2 feet clean fill lying beneath site surface cap.

Title: 2012-2013 Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&enforcement_id=60311493 Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 10/31/2012
Comments:

Title: Review of Existing Data
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&doc_id=6012944 198 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Site Characterization Report
Date Completed: 9/26/2006
Comments: Site characterization approved. Site investigations indicated that shallow soil is impacted from historical pesticide use. Arsenic determined to be primary contaminant of concern at site.

Title: Project Concept Acknowledgment
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&doc_id=6015556 Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Technical Report
Date Completed: 8/17/2006
Comments: Letter acknowledges that project concept of residential development above ground-level parking with capped arsenic-impacted soils is generally feasible with identified controls and in the context of Department precedents.

Letter refers project proponents to DTSC Sensitive Uses Policy Memo.

Title: Site Characterization Reports
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&doc_id=6011852 Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Technical Report
Date Completed: 4/28/2006
Comments: Site investigations indicated that shallow soil is impacted from historical pesticide use. Arsenic concentrations were observed to be elevated. Other pesticide-associated COCs were detected at concentrations below human health screening levels.

Title: Operations and Maintenance Plan
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&doc_id=6016902 Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Operations and Maintenance Plan
Date Completed: 5/9/2008
Comments: RAW finalized on 5-9-2008; O&M Plan is Appendix G of RAW. O&M Agreement to be drafted when construction commences.

Title: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate for 2018-2019 (Equity Residential) Title Link:

Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 10/4/2018
Comments: DTSC annual oversight cost estimate for fiscal year 2018/2019 Title: Operation and Maintenance Plan for Parcel B1/B2 Park Area Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&doc_id=60417215 Area Name: Parcel B1/B2
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970989&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area: Park Area
Sub Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=60000294&site_id=2010294 Document Type: Operations and Maintenance Plan
Date Completed: 7/11/2017
Comments: The Operation and Maintenance Plan for the Park Area of Parcel B1/B2 outlines the procedures for inspection, reporting, and maintenance of the hardscape cap to ensure it continues to be an effective barrier to the underlying impacted soil.

Title: Operation and Maintenance Plan - Parcel C
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&doc_id=60417211 199 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Area Name: Parcel C
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970990&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Operations and Maintenance Plan
Date Completed: 3/4/2015
Comments: The Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Plan outlines the cap inspection, maintenance, and reporting for Parcel C.

The Site-wide cap, which varies in the materials that comprise it and in thickness, must be maintained. No disturbance of underlying arsenic-impacted soil shall take place without notification to DTSC. Annual inspections and reporting are required. The O&M Plan was included as Appendix F of and approved as part of the Removal Action Completion Report.

Title: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate Letter
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&enforcement_id=60380503 Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 10/10/2014
Comments:

Title: DTSC Response to Prospective Redesign of Parcel C Cap Construction Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&enforcement_id=60328934 Area Name: Parcel C
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970990&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Correspondence
Date Completed: 4/17/2013
Comments: Letter drafted to City of San Jose, upon request: DTSC amenable to redesign of the cap to be constructed at Parcel C, given the following provisions: 1)final cap design is submitted to DTSC for approval prior to field implementation; 2) the O&M Plan is revised to reflect new design aspects; and 3) the future Land Use Covenant and Operations and Maintenance Agreement will reflect new design aspects, and provide pertinent and appropriate information as needed (ie depth to impacted soil across site, modified site-specific Soil Management Plan).

Title: CEQA
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&enforcement_id=6010006 Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: CEQA - Responsible Agency Review
Date Completed: 5/9/2008
Comments: Notice of Determination and Statement of Findings signed with Final RAW approval on 5/9/2008; sent to OEARA for filing.

Title: Voluntary Cleanup Agreement
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&enforcement_id=6009295 Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Standard Voluntary Agreement
Date Completed: 9/11/2006
Comments: Voluntary Cleanup Agreement signed.

Title: Certification for Parcel A
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&enforcement_id=60306343 Area Name: Parcel A
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970988&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Certification
Date Completed: 4/24/2019
Comments: Parcel A of larger site has been certified on 04/24/2019. Parcel A has completed the implementation of the Removal Action Workplan activities, and institutional controls (Land Use Covenant, Operations and Maintenance 200 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Agreement) put in place.

Title: 2017 Annual Inspection Report - Parcel B1/B2 Park Area Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&doc_id=60442141 Area Name: Parcel B1/B2
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970989&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area: Park Area
Sub Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=60000294&site_id=2010294 Document Type: Land Use Restriction Monitoring Report
Date Completed: 3/9/2018
Comments: City of San Jose staff performed an annual inspection of the Vista Montana Neighborhood Park - Parcel B1/B2 on December 19, 2017 and submitted an inspection report to DTSC. The Site cap was observed to be in good condition, and compliance with the restrictions and requirements of the land use covenant was verified..

Title: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate for Parcels A and B1/B2 for 2017-2018 Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&enforcement_id=60432467 Area Name: Parcel B1/B2
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970989&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 10/9/2017
Comments: DTSC oversight cost estimate for fiscal year 2017/2018 (July 1, 2017 - June 30, 2018) Title: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate for Parcel C for 2016-2017 Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&enforcement_id=60414306 Area Name: Parcel C
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970990&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 9/30/2016
Comments: DTSC letter with oversight cost estimate for fiscal year 2016/2017 Title: Completion Report for Parcel C (Including Operation and Maintenance Plan) Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&doc_id=60306341 Area Name: Parcel C
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970990&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Removal Action Completion Report
Date Completed: 3/24/2015
Comments:

Title: Work Notice for Parcel C Fieldwork
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&doc_id=60348203 Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Work Notice
Date Completed: 1/23/2014
Comments: DTSC distributed the work notice to inform the community about the start of cleanup activities on Parcel C, a fiveacre portion of the Site. and to describe the activities that may be observed.

Title: Work Notice for RAW Fieldwork, Parcel B1/B2
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&doc_id=60331683 Area Name: Parcel B1/B2
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970989&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Work Notice
Date Completed: 10/25/2013
Comments: The Work Notice announces the start of the fieldwork on Parcels B1 and B2 that is detailed in the Explanation of 201 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Significant Differences.

Title: Explanation of Significant Differences for Removal Action Workplan - Parcel B1/B2 Disposal of Impacted Soils Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&doc_id=60331679 Area Name: Parcel B1/B2
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970989&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Removal Action Workplan w/ESD
Date Completed: 10/25/2013
Comments: The Explanation of Significant Differences details a modification of the remedy selected in the Final Removal Action Work Plan previously approved by DTSC due to the addition of a subterranean parking garage to the design of the residential redevelopment project at Parcels B1 and B2. Consolidation of impacted soil and the construction of a cap were selected for Parcels B1 and B2 in the Final Removal Work Plan. The ESD modifies the actions to be taken on Parcels B1 and B2 to excavation and off-site disposal of impacted soil along with the construction of a cap over impacted soils to remain in some areas at Parcels B1 and B2.

Title: Land Use Restriction (Parcel C)
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&enforcement_id=60306338 Area Name: Parcel C
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970990&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Land Use Restriction
Date Completed: 9/3/2015
Comments: A Land Use Covenant that restricts land use and activities on Parcel C was recorded with Santa Clara County Recorder on 09-03-2015. The Land Use Covenant prohibits sensitive land uses (i.e. residences, hospital, day care, and school for persons under age 18) on Parcel C. Activities that disturb soil below the site cover/cap are required to performed in accordance with a DTSC-approved Soil Management Plan. A public park has been constructed and is expected to remain on the parcel.

Title: Operation & Maintenance Agreement for Parcel C
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&enforcement_id=60306339 Area Name: Parcel C
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970990&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Operation & Maintenance Order/Agreement
Date Completed: 8/28/2015
Comments: The Operation and Maintenance Agreement for Parcel C was fully executed on August 28, 2015. The Agreement is between DTSC, the City of San Jose, and Equity Residential. Both parties are responsible for implementing operation and maintenance activities for the cap at Parcel C, where a public park has been constructed.

Title: Community Profile
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&doc_id=6013366 Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Community Profile
Date Completed: 3/22/2007
Comments: Community profile approved. Survey indicated low community interest in site cleanup.

Title: 2018 Annual Inspection Report - Parcel C & Parcel B1/B2 Park Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&doc_id=60400713 Area Name: City Parcels
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1971540&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Land Use Restriction Monitoring Report
Date Completed: 9/15/2020
Comments: Park caps at Parcel C and Parcel B1/B2 Park are in tact. Land use per acceptable uses allowed by Land Use Covenant of both Parcel C and Parcel B1/B2 Park.

Title: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate for 2019-2020 (City of San Jose) Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&enforcement_id=60465112 202 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Area Name: City Parcels
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1971540&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 10/11/2019
Comments:

Title: Operation & Maintenance Agreement for Parcel A
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&enforcement_id=60306346 Area Name: Parcel A
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970988&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Operation & Maintenance Order/Agreement
Date Completed: 4/4/2019
Comments: Operation and Maintenance Agreement between DTSC and Vista Montana Park Apartments for Parcel A.

Title: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate for Parcel C for 2017-2018 Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&enforcement_id=60432478 Area Name: Parcel C
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970990&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate
Date Completed: 10/9/2017
Comments: DTSC oversight cost estimate for fiscal year 2017/2018 (July 1, 2017 - June 30, 2018) Title: Certification for Parcel B1/B2 Park Area
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=60000294&enforcement_id=60434853 Area Name: Parcel B1/B2
Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report? global_id=60000294&ou_id=1970989&hideside=True&printerfriendly=True Sub Area: Park Area
Sub Area Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=60000294&site_id=2010294 Document Type: Certification
Date Completed: 9/21/2017
Comments:
m-38-820293659-b 1 of 1 S 0.75 /
3,940.74

9.10 /
-3
SUN CIRCUITS, INC. - LAFAYETTE
5191 LAFAYETTE STREET
SANTA CLARA CA 95054
p1p-820293659-y1y
Estor/EPA ID: 71003561 Assembly District: 25
Site Code: Senate District: 10
Nat Priority List: NO Permit Renewal Lead:

APN: NONE SPECIFIED Public Partici Spclst:

Census Tract: 6085505001 Project Manager:

Site Type: TIERED PERMIT County: SANTA CLARA
Address Description: 5191 LAFAYETTE STREET Latitude: 37.4086779 Office: CLEANUP BERKELEY Longitude: -121.9677568
Special Program: Acres: NONE SPECIFIED
Funding: Supervisor:

Cleanup Status: INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF
Cleanup Oversight Agencies: NONE SPECIFIED
School District:

Past Use that Caused Contam: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Contamin of Concern:

NONE SPECIFIED
Site History:

Status: INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION
38 ENVIROSTOR
203 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
A2 Program Type: TIERED PERMIT
CalEnviroScreen Score: 46-50%
Summary Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=71003561 m-39-820295901-b 1 of 1 SSE 0.78 /
4,095.38

9.78 /
-2
COATEK, INC.
2272 CALLE DE LUNA
SANTA CLARA CA 95054
p1p-820295901-y1y
Estor/EPA ID: 71003228 Assembly District: 25
Site Code: Senate District: 10
Nat Priority List: NO Permit Renewal Lead:

APN: NONE SPECIFIED Public Partici Spclst:

Census Tract: 6085505001 Project Manager:

Site Type: TIERED PERMIT County: SANTA CLARA
Address Description: 2272 CALLE DE LUNA Latitude: 37.4085995 Office: CLEANUP BERKELEY Longitude: -121.9638365
Special Program: Acres: NONE SPECIFIED
Funding: Supervisor:

Cleanup Status: INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF
Cleanup Oversight Agencies: NONE SPECIFIED
School District:

Past Use that Caused Contam: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Contamin of Concern:

NONE SPECIFIED
Site History:

9.67 /
-2

PARAGON ELECTRONIC
SYSTEMS, INC.
2318 CALLE DE LUNA
SANTA CLARA CA 95054
p1p-820295557-y1y
Estor/EPA ID: 71003542 Assembly District: 25
Site Code: Senate District: 10
Nat Priority List: NO Permit Renewal Lead:

APN: NONE SPECIFIED Public Partici Spclst:

Census Tract: 6085505001 Project Manager:

Site Type: TIERED PERMIT County: SANTA CLARA
Address Description: 2318 CALLE DE LUNA Latitude: 37.4079792 Office: CLEANUP BERKELEY Longitude: -121.9658901
Special Program: Acres: 0 ACRES
Funding: Supervisor: MARK PIROS
Cleanup Status: NO ACTION REQUIRED AS OF 10/2/1997
Cleanup Oversight Agencies: NONE SPECIFIED
School District:

Past Use that Caused Contam: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Contamin of Concern:

NONE SPECIFIED
Site History:

Status: NO ACTION REQUIRED
A2 Program Type: TIERED PERMIT
CalEnviroScreen Score: 46-50%
Summary Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=71003542 39 40

ENVIROSTOR

ENVIROSTOR
204 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Completed Activities
Title: Inspection - Phase I Verification
Title Link:

Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Phase I Verification
Date Completed: 10/2/1997
Comments:
m-41-878648552-b 1 of 1 S 0.82 /
4,347.12

10.17 /
-2

WESTERN DIGITAL
5102 CALLE DEL SOL
SANTA CLARA CA 95054
p1p-878648552-y1y
Estor/EPA ID: 71002774 Assembly District: 24
Site Code: Senate District: 13
Nat Priority List: NO Permit Renewal Lead:

APN: NONE SPECIFIED Public Partici Spclst:

Census Tract: 6085505001 Project Manager:

Site Type: TIERED PERMIT County: SANTA CLARA
Address Description: 5102 CALLE DEL SOL Latitude: 37.4076935 Office: CLEANUP BERKELEY Longitude: -121.9650724
Special Program: Acres: NONE SPECIFIED
Funding: Supervisor:

Cleanup Status: INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF
Cleanup Oversight Agencies: NONE SPECIFIED
School District:

Past Use that Caused Contam: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Contamin of Concern:

NONE SPECIFIED
Site History:

11.04 /
-1
NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC. - 400

N FIRST ST
4000 N. FIRST STREET
SAN JOSE CA 95134
p1p-820297477-y1y
Estor/EPA ID: 71002971 Assembly District: 25
Site Code: Senate District: 10
Nat Priority List: NO Permit Renewal Lead:

APN: NONE SPECIFIED Public Partici Spclst:

Census Tract: 6085505009 Project Manager:

Site Type: TIERED PERMIT County: SANTA CLARA
Address Description: 4000 N. FIRST STREET Latitude: 37.415309 Office: CLEANUP BERKELEY Longitude: -121.952411
Special Program: Acres: NONE SPECIFIED
Funding: Supervisor:

Cleanup Status: INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF
Cleanup Oversight Agencies: NONE SPECIFIED
School District:

Past Use that Caused Contam: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Contamin of Concern:

NONE SPECIFIED
41 42

ENVIROSTOR

ENVIROSTOR
205 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Site History:

Facility Comments: Per 7/11/02 CUPA correspondence with facility, treated waste stream is not hazardous. CUPA withdrew authorization for 1 CA unit.

28.93 /
17 SOUTH BAY ASBESTOS AREA

FT OF LIBERTY ST GUADALUPE
RIV
ALVISO CA 95002
p1p-807276430-y1y
EPA ID: CAD980894885 Latitude: 37.429861
SITE ID: 0902250 Longitude: -121.9811
SEMS ID: 902250
NPL (SEMS FOIA 004)
Final Date: 06/10/86 County: SANTA CLARA
Federal Facility: No Latitude: 37.429861
SAA (Superfund Alt.): Longitude: -121.981100
NPL Status Information (EPA's Where You Live Map)
SITS ID: 931
Status: NPL Site
Construction Completion No: 565
Construction Completion: 09/23/1998
Proposed Date: 10/15/1984
Listing Date: 06/10/1986
NOID Date:

Deletion Date:

Notice of Data Availability:

Site Listing Narrative: <a href="https://semspub.epa.gov/src/document/09/2400238" target="_blank">CAD980894885 (PDF)</a> Site Progress Profile: <a href="https://cumulis.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0902250" target="_blank">South Bay Asbestos Area</a>
Proposed Fr Notice: <a href="https://semspub.epa.gov/src/document/11/189641" target="_blank">10/15/1984 (PDF)</a> Listing Fr Notice: <a href="https://semspub.epa.gov/src/document/11/189628" target="_blank">06/10/1986 (PDF)</a> NOID Fr Notice:

Deletion Fr Notice:

Restoration Fr Notice:

Site Had a Partial Deletion: No
m-44-878648460-b 1 of 1 ESE 0.97 /
5,139.62

9.93 /
-2

TWIN CREEKS TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.
3930 N. FIRST STREET
SAN JOSE CA 95134
p1p-878648460-y1y
Estor/EPA ID: 71002098 Assembly District: 25
Site Code: Senate District: 10
Nat Priority List: NO Permit Renewal Lead:

APN: NONE SPECIFIED Public Partici Spclst:

Census Tract: 6085505009 Project Manager:

Site Type: TIERED PERMIT County: SANTA CLARA
Address Description: 3930 N. FIRST STREET Latitude: 37.4144283 Office: CLEANUP BERKELEY Longitude: -121.9506576
Special Program: Acres: 0 ACRES
Funding: Supervisor: MARK PIROS
Cleanup Status: INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF 5/11/2009 Cleanup Oversight Agencies: NONE SPECIFIED
School District:

Past Use that Caused Contam: NONE SPECIFIED
43 44
NPL

ENVIROSTOR
206 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED
Site History:

Facility Comments: TP initial notification 5/11/2009
Potential Contamin of Concern:

NONE SPECIFIED
Status: INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION
A2 Program Type: TIERED PERMIT
CalEnviroScreen Score: 61-65%
Summary Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=71002098 Completed Activities
Title: Phase I Verification
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=71002098&doc_id=60289585 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Phase 1
Date Completed: 5/7/2010
Comments: Phase I checklist indicates no further action. This has not been verified by DTSC. m-45-820293887-b 1 of 1 ESE 0.99 /
5,235.70

11.71 /
0 SUNPOWER CORP.
3939 N FIRST ST
SAN JOSE CA 95134
p1p-820293887-y1y
Estor/EPA ID: 71003820 Assembly District: 25
Site Code: Senate District: 10
Nat Priority List: NO Permit Renewal Lead:

APN: NONE SPECIFIED Public Partici Spclst:

Census Tract: 6085505009 Project Manager:

Site Type: TIERED PERMIT County: SANTA CLARA
Address Description: 3939 N FIRST ST Latitude: 37.412576 Office: CLEANUP BERKELEY Longitude: -121.951498
Special Program: Acres: NONE SPECIFIED
Funding: Supervisor:

Cleanup Status: INACTIVE - NEEDS EVALUATION AS OF
Cleanup Oversight Agencies: NONE SPECIFIED
School District:

Past Use that Caused Contam: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Contamin of Concern:

NONE SPECIFIED
Site History:

9.57 /
-3

OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS

CORP LDFL-ALVISO

LOS ESTEROS RD
SAN JOSE CA 95134
p1p-820296578-y1y
Estor/EPA ID: 43490055 Assembly District: 22
Site Code: Senate District:

Nat Priority List: NO Permit Renewal Lead:

APN: NONE SPECIFIED Public Partici Spclst:
45 46

ENVIROSTOR

ENVIROSTOR
207 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Map Key Number of
Records
Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev/Diff
(ft)
Site DB
Census Tract: 6085504602 Project Manager:

Site Type: EVALUATION County: SANTA CLARA
Address Description: LOS ESTEROS RD Latitude: 37.4327482298858 Office: CLEANUP BERKELEY Longitude: -121.954042228754
Special Program: * SITE CHAR & ASSESS GRANT (CERCLA
104)
Acres: 53 ACRES
Funding: RESPONSIBLE PARTY Supervisor:

Cleanup Status: REFER: RWQCB AS OF 4/24/1987
Cleanup Oversight Agencies: RWQCB 2 - SAN FRANCISCO BAY - LEAD AGENCY School District:

Past Use that Caused Contam: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Contamin of Concern:

UNCATEGORIZED
Site History:

Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation (OCF) owned and operated a solid waster disposal site at the site from 1955 to the 1980s. Since 1985 Zanker Road Resource Management Limited has owned and operated the site known as Zanker Material Processing Facility Landfill (ZMPF). IT is a Class III waste disposal site and is permitted for the disposal of off-specification materials and waste product from the Owens-Corning Fiberglass Plant. The wastes typically consists of insulation, roof shingles, and non-recyclable waste.

Status: REFER: RWQCB
A2 Program Type: EVALUATION
CalEnviroScreen Score: 81-85%
Summary Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report?global_id=43490055 Completed Activities
Title: Site Screening
Title Link: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/final_documents2?global_id=43490055&doc_id=6010198 Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Site Screening
Date Completed: 1/2/2002
Comments: The Regional Water Board provides oversight for this site.

Title: Site Screening
Title Link:

Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: Site Screening
Date Completed: 4/24/1987
Comments: Completed Site Screening. In September 1985, a Preliminary Assessment (PA) determined that hazardous wastes such as metals and solvents may have been disposed in the landfill including furnace refractory, brick, slag, chromium dust, methylene chloride, waste adhesives, paint, solvent and diacetone alcohol, and epoxy resin. The SF Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) required the installation of leachate collection and removal system.

Title: Discovery
Title Link:

Area Name:

Area Link:

Sub Area:

Sub Area Link:

Document Type: * Discovery
Date Completed: 10/12/1983
Comments:
208 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 h-Unplottable Summary
Total: 3 Unplottable sites
DB Company Name/Site
Name
Address City Zip ERIS ID
uu-CALSITES-891190679-aa SOUTH BAY ASBESTOS
AREA

FT OF LIBERTY ST GUADALUPE
RIV
SAN JOSE CA 95002 891190679
uu-SUPERFUND ROD-859643217-aa SOUTH BAY ASBESTOS
AREA

FT OF LIBERTY ST GUADALUPE
RIV
ALVISO CA 95002 859643217
uu-SWAT-822570359-aa SANTA CLARA ALL

PURPOSE LANDFILL
SOUTH OF HWY 237 OFF

LAFAYETTE SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
CA 822570359

CALSITES

SUPERFUND ROD
SWAT
Unplottable Summary
209 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 h-Unplottable Report
Site: SOUTH BAY ASBESTOS AREA
FT OF LIBERTY ST GUADALUPE RIV SAN JOSE CA 95002 uu-CALSITES-891190679-bb ID No: 43490060 Assembly: 22
Status Date: 01/01/1984 Senate: 10
NPL: L Region: 2
Tier: Region Name: BERKELEY
Fund: C County Co: 43
Access : Facility County: SANTA CLARA
Access Code: NOT REPORTED Lat Deg: 0
Cortese: Lat Min: 0
Hrscore: Lat Sec: 0
Hrsdate: Lat Dir:

Groundwater Contam: N Long Deg: 0
GW Code: Long Min: 0
No Sources: 0 Long Sec: 0
RWQCB Name: SAN FRANCISCO BAY Long Dir:

Branch Name: NORTH COAST Llmethod:

Staff: PLEE1 Lldesc:

Senior:

Status Name: ANNUAL WORKPLAN - ACTIVE SITE
Type Name: NPL SITE, RP-FUNDED
Lead Name: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
SIC Name: ELECTRIC, GAS & SANITARY SERVICES
Filename:

Comments:

Completed RA. In July 1993, US EPA and the responsible parties encapsulated the asbestos contaminated fill in a Highway 237 embankment under construction. Completed RA. Issued ROD for the Ring Levee Operable Unit (OU) requiring removal of the entire levee, after flood control improvements on the Coyote Creek were completed. Issued Record of Decision (ROD) for the truckyards/landfill requiring that sampling be conducted on these properties followed by capping or soil removal. Issued Orders to four of the Truckyard owners requiring them to pave their respective yards. By late 1992, three of the truckyards removed all asbestos contaminated fill to residential levels. For Neu Truck Yard, the remaining truck yard property, the US EPA will be conducting soil sampling to determine what further action is required. Recorded Deed Restrictions.

Background:

During the 1950s, several landfills in the Alviso area accepted wastes from an asbestos cement pipe manufacturing facility. This waste was later used for raising the grade of the site and for constructing a ring-levee, resulting in asbestos contamination throughout the Alviso area and covering roughly 330 acres.

The Site was listed on the Federal Superfund list in 1985. U.S. EPA has been the lead regulatory agency overseeing work. The Site was divided into two operable units - the Ring Levee and the Landfill/Truckyard.

On September 30, 1997, U.S. EPA and Lincoln 237 Associates Limited Partnership and Lincoln Property Company No. 2233 Limited Partnership entered into two Prospective Purchaser Agreements and Covenant Not to Sue for the Western Parcel and the Eastern parcel, respectively. The agreements incorporated Soil Management Plans describing soil control measures for asbestos and asbestos containing materials, methane, petroleum hydrocarbons, and lead. A portion of the Santos Landfill is Parcel 1 of the Eastern Parcel. Parcel 2 (not part of Santos Landfill), is the other portion of the Eastern Parcel Agreement and requires a deed restiction since asbestos waste piping was found there. The Final Soil Management Report, dated January 28, 1999, describes the construction activities performed at the Eastern Parcel pursuant to the requirements of the Soil Management Plan (1997). The construction activities included construction of a Cap (consisting of five two-story office buildings, pavement and 18 inches of clean soil in landscaped areas), and installation of a passive gas collection system to remove methane migrating upward from under the Cap. On June 16, 1999, U.

S. EPA and Legacy Partners 2335 LLC entered into an Agreement and Covenant Not to Sue for the Collishaw Property. Santos Landfill - A portion of the Santos Landfill is Parcel 1 of the Eastern Parcel Agreement and Covenant Not to Sue which requires a deed restriction. Parcel 2 (not part of Santos Landfill) is part of the Eastern PPA, also requires a deed restiction since asbestos waste piping was found there.

The rest of the Santos Landfill is the Summerset Mobile Estates mobile home park and the property located on the northern side of the Guadalupe River. Santos is planning to send U. S. EPA information that shows that the northern property is not part of the Santos Landfill. Sainte Claire Landfill - is located on the northern side of the Guadalupe River and divided into two parcels by Gold Street. The part on the eastern side of Gold Street is operated as a truck yard/storage yard. The part on the western side of Gold Street is undeveloped. Both parcels require a deed restriction as a landfill area that received asbestos waste in the past. Marshland Landfill is regulated under the RWQCB and a deed restriction has been recorded under the RWQCB authority. U.S. EPA and Legacy Partners entered into a Prospective Purchaser Agreement and Covenant Not to Sue for this area (now known as the Highway 237 Disposal Site) which included another Soil Management Plan during construction.

CALSITES
Unplottable Report
210 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Site: SOUTH BAY ASBESTOS AREA
FT OF LIBERTY ST GUADALUPE RIV ALVISO CA 95002 uu-SUPERFUND ROD-859643217-bb EPA ID: CAD980894885
Site ID: 0902250
NPL Status: Final
Non NPL Status:

County: SANTA CLARA
Region: 09
Data Source(s): U.S. EPA SUPERFUND PROGRAM - Source: SEMS Superfund Public User Database - FOIA-002 Records of Decision (RODS), ROD Amendments, and Explanation of Significant Differences (ESDs); Searchable Superfund Decision Documents database (https://www.epa.gov/superfund/search-superfund-documents), made available by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Retrieved on February 23, 2021.

Document Information
Doc ID: 2243199
Date: 09/28/2011
Pub No:

Description:

PDF Link: https://semspub.epa.gov/src/document/09/2243199 Title: Explanation of significant differences (ESD) to ROD, OU 2 - overall site(17 pp, 2.52 MB) Doc ID: 88126052
Date: 06/26/1991
Pub No:

Description:

PDF Link: https://semspub.epa.gov/src/document/09/88126052 Title: Record of decision (ROD) amendment, Ring Levee OU, w/attchs (appendix 1 & responsiveness summary)(32 pp,

1.97 MB)
Doc ID: 88126201
Date: 09/29/1989
Pub No:

Description:

PDF Link: https://semspub.epa.gov/src/document/09/88126201 Title: Record of decision (ROD), General OU, w/o attchs (administrative record index, responsiveness summary, or public meeting transcript)(33 pp, 1.92 MB)
Doc ID: 88126054
Date: 09/28/1988
Pub No:

Description:

PDF Link: https://semspub.epa.gov/src/document/09/88126054 Title: Record of decision (ROD), Ring Levee OU, w/attchs (admin record index & responsiveness summary)(313 pp,

21.18 MB)
Historical Document Information
Doc ID: 100003211
Date: 09/29/1989
PDF Link: https://semspub.epa.gov/src/document/09/100003211 Title: Record of Decision(33 pp, 1.93 MB)
Action Information
Seq ID: 2
Action Name: GOVT ESD
Operable Unit Name: RING LEVEE
Actual Comp Date: 11/18/93
Seq ID: 1
Action Name: GOVT ROD Amendment
Operable Unit Name: RING LEVEE
Actual Comp Date: 06/26/91

SUPERFUND ROD
211 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Seq ID: 3
Action Name: GOVT Decision Document (ROD)
Operable Unit Name: OVERALL SITE
Actual Comp Date: 09/29/89
Seq ID: 2
Action Name: GOVT Decision Document (ROD)
Operable Unit Name: RING LEVEE
Actual Comp Date: 09/29/88
Seq ID: 3
Action Name: GOVT ESD
Operable Unit Name: OVERALL SITE
Actual Comp Date: 09/28/11
Site: SANTA CLARA ALL PURPOSE LANDFILL
SOUTH OF HWY 237 OFF LAFAYETTE SANTA CLARA, CA 95050 CA uu-SWAT-822570359-bb Site Leak:

Rank: 2
SWIS Number: 43-AO-0001
Report Status Code: P
Report Status: PENDING
Site Classification Code:

Transcribe Source: Solid Waste Assessment Test (SWAT) Program Report to the Legislature 1989-1990 Site Classification:

Activity Status Code:

Activity Description:

Character of Site Code:

Character of Site:

Size of Site Code:

Size of Site:

Proposal Status:

Site Leak Desc:

Type of Leak:

Enforce Action:

Enforce Action Desc:

Waste Management Unit:

Waste Discharger Sys NO: 2 438026001
Initial Notif Date:

Proposal Due Date:

Report Due Date: 07/01/88
Anticipated Rprt Submit Dt:

Report Received Date: 07/01/88
Report Target Review Date:

Report Resubmitted Due Date:

Report Resubmitted Rcvd Dt:

Report Approval Date:

Anticip Proposal Submit Dt:

Proposal Received Date:

Proposal Target Review Date:

Proposal Status Code:

Proposal Resubmitted Due Dt:

Proposal Resubmitted
Received Due Date:

Proposal Accepted Date:

Exemption Questionnaire
Approved Date:

Waiver Approved Date:

Type of Leak Code:

DHS & CWMB Notif Date:

Report Summ Sent Date:

Monitor Program Revise Date:

Revise WDR Target Date:

Hazardous Waste Surface:

Above Reg Level Surface:

Below Reg Level Surface:

Hazardous Waste Ground:

Above Reg Level Ground:

Below Reg Level Ground:

SWAT
212 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Hazardous Waste Vadose:

Above Reg Level Vadose:

Below Reg Level Vadose:

Surface:

Ground:

Vadose:

Operator Name: CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CITY HALL
Agency Name:

County Number:

County Name: SANTA CLARA
Regional Board Contact:

Region: SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGION 2
Remarks:
213 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 h-Appendix: Database Descriptions
Environmental Risk Information Services (ERIS) can search the following databases. The extent of historical information varies with each database and current information is determined by what is publicly available to ERIS at the time of update. ERIS updates databases as set out in ASTM Standard E1527-13, Section 8.1.8 Sources of Standard Source Information:
"Government information from nongovernmental sources may be considered current if the source updates the information at least every 90 days, or, for information that is updated less frequently than quarterly by the government agency, within 90 days of the date the government agency makes the information available to the public." Standard Environmental Record Sources
Federal
Facility Response Plan: rr-FRP-bb
List of facilities that have submitted Facility Response Plans (FRP) to EPA. Facilities that could reasonably be expected to cause "substantial harm" to the environment by discharging oil into or on navigable waters are required to prepare and submit Facility Response Plans (FRPs). Harm is determined based on total oil storage capacity, secondary containment and age of tanks, oil transfer activities, history of discharges, proximity to a public drinking water intake or sensitive environments.

Government Publication Date: Dec 2, 2020
Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program: rr-DOE FUSRAP-bb The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from the Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations. The DOE Office of Legacy Management (LM) established long-term surveillance and maintenance (LTS&M) requirements for remediated FUSRAP sites. DOE evaluates the final site conditions of a remediated site on the basis of risk for different future uses. DOE then confirms that LTS&M requirements will maintain protectiveness.

Government Publication Date: Mar 4, 2017
National Priority List: rr-NPL-bb
National Priorities List (Superfund)-NPL: EPA's (United States Environmental Protection Agency) list of the most serious uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous waste sites identified for possible long-term remedial action under the Superfund program. The NPL, which EPA is required to update at least once a year, is based primarily on the score a site receives from EPA's Hazard Ranking System. A site must be on the NPL to receive money from the Superfund Trust Fund for remedial action.

Government Publication Date: Feb 23, 2021
National Priority List - Proposed: rr-PROPOSED NPL-bb
Includes sites proposed (by the EPA, the state, or concerned citizens) for addition to the NPL due to contamination by hazardous waste and identified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a candidate for cleanup because it poses a risk to human health and/or the environment.

Government Publication Date: Feb 23, 2021
Deleted NPL: rr-DELETED NPL-bb
The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL.

In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate.

Government Publication Date: Feb 23, 2021
SEMS List 8R Active Site Inventory: rr-SEMS-bb
The Superfund Program has deployed the Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS), which integrates multiple legacy systems into a comprehensive tracking and reporting tool. This inventory contains active sites evaluated by the Superfund program that are either proposed to be or are on the National Priorities List (NPL) as well as sites that are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. The Active Site Inventory Report displays site and location information at active SEMS sites. An active site is one at which site assessment, removal, remedial, enforcement, cost recovery, or oversight activities are being planned or conducted.

Government Publication Date: Jan 28, 2021
FRP

DOE FUSRAP
NPL

PROPOSED NPL

DELETED NPL
SEMS
Appendix: Database Descriptions
214 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 SEMS List 8R Archive Sites: rr-SEMS ARCHIVE-bb
The Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS) Archived Site Inventory displays site and location information at sites archived from SEMS. An archived site is one at which EPA has determined that assessment has been completed and no further remedial action is planned under the Superfund program at this time.

Government Publication Date: Jan 28, 2021
Inventory of Open Dumps, June 1985: rr-ODI-bb
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) provides for publication of an inventory of open dumps. The Act defines "open dumps" as facilities which do not comply with EPA's "Criteria for Classification of Solid Waste Disposal Facilities and Practices" (40 CFR 257).

Government Publication Date: Jun 1985
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System - CERCLIS:
rr-CERCLIS-bb
Superfund is a program administered by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to locate, investigate, and clean up the worst hazardous waste sites throughout the United States. CERCLIS is a database of potential and confirmed hazardous waste sites at which the EPA Superfund program has some involvement. It contains sites that are either proposed to be or are on the National Priorities List (NPL) as well as sites that are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. The EPA administers the Superfund program in cooperation with individual states and tribal governments; this database is made available by the EPA.

Government Publication Date: Oct 25, 2013
EPA Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands: rr-IODI-bb Public Law 103-399, The Indian Lands Open Dump Cleanup Act of 1994, enacted October 22, 1994, identified congressional concerns that solid waste open dump sites located on American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN) lands threaten the health and safety of residents of those lands and contiguous areas. The purpose of the Act is to identify the location of open dumps on Indian lands, assess the relative health and environment hazards posed by those sites, and provide financial and technical assistance to Indian tribal governments to close such dumps in compliance with Federal standards and regulations or standards promulgated by Indian Tribal governments or Alaska Native entities.

Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 1998
CERCLIS - No Further Remedial Action Planned: rr-CERCLIS NFRAP-bb An archived site is one at which EPA has determined that assessment has been completed and no further remedial action is planned under the Superfund program at this time. The Archive designation means that, to the best of EPA's knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL). This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site.

Government Publication Date: Oct 25, 2013
CERCLIS Liens: rr-CERCLIS LIENS-bb
A Federal Superfund lien exists at any property where EPA has incurred Superfund costs to address contamination ("Superfund site") and has provided notice of liability to the property owner. A Federal CERCLA ("Superfund") lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Government Publication Date: Jan 30, 2014
RCRA CORRACTS-Corrective Action: rr-RCRA CORRACTS-bb
RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. At these sites, the Corrective Action Program ensures that cleanups occur.

EPA and state regulators work with facilities and communities to design remedies based on the contamination, geology, and anticipated use unique to each site.

Government Publication Date: Jan 22, 2021
RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD Facilities: rr-RCRA TSD-bb
RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. This database includes Non-Corrective Action sites listed as treatment, storage and/or disposal facilities of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).

Government Publication Date: Jan 22, 2021

SEMS ARCHIVE
ODI

CERCLIS
IODI

CERCLIS NFRAP

CERCLIS LIENS

RCRA CORRACTS

RCRA TSD
215 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 RCRA Generator List: rr-RCRA LQG-bb
RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Large Quantity Generators (LQGs) generate 1,000 kilograms per month or more of hazardous waste or more than one kilogram per month of acutely hazardous waste.

Government Publication Date: Jan 22, 2021
RCRA Small Quantity Generators List: rr-RCRA SQG-bb
RCRA Info is the EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Small Quantity Generators (SQGs) generate more than 100 kilograms, but less than 1,000 kilograms, of hazardous waste per month.

Government Publication Date: Jan 22, 2021
RCRA Very Small Quantity Generators List: rr-RCRA VSQG-bb RCRA Info is the EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Very Small Quantity Generators (VSQG) generate 100 kilograms or less per month of hazardous waste, or one kilogram or less per month of acutely hazardous waste. Additionally, VSQG may not accumulate more than 1,000 kilograms of hazardous waste at any time.

Government Publication Date: Jan 22, 2021
RCRA Non-Generators: rr-RCRA NON GEN-bb
RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste.

Government Publication Date: Jan 22, 2021
Federal Engineering Controls-ECs: rr-FED ENG-bb
Engineering controls (ECs) encompass a variety of engineered and constructed physical barriers (e.g., soil capping, sub-surface venting systems, mitigation barriers, fences) to contain and/or prevent exposure to contamination on a property. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Government Publication Date: Aug 26, 2020
Federal Institutional Controls- ICs: rr-FED INST-bb
Institutional controls are non-engineered instruments, such as administrative and legal controls, that help minimize the potential for human exposure to contamination and/or protect the integrity of the remedy. Although it is EPA's (United States Environmental Protection Agency ) expectation that treatment or engineering controls will be used to address principal threat wastes and that groundwater will be returned to its beneficial use whenever practicable, ICs play an important role in site remedies because they reduce exposure to contamination by limiting land or resource use and guide human behavior at a site.

Government Publication Date: Aug 26, 2020
Land Use Control Information System: rr-LUCIS-bb
The LUCIS database is maintained by the U.S. Department of the Navy and contains information for former Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) properties across the United States.

Government Publication Date: Sep 1, 2006
Emergency Response Notification System: rr-ERNS 1982 TO 1986-bb Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports controlled by the National Response Center. The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting oil, chemical, radiological, biological, and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories.

Government Publication Date: 1982-1986

RCRA LQG

RCRA SQG

RCRA VSQG

RCRA NON GEN

FED ENG

FED INST
LUCIS
ERNS 1982 TO 1986
216 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Emergency Response Notification System: rr-ERNS 1987 TO 1989-bb Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports controlled by the National Response Center. The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting oil, chemical, radiological, biological, and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories.

Government Publication Date: 1987-1989
Emergency Response Notification System: rr-ERNS-bb
Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports made available by the United States Coast Guard National Response Center (NRC). The NRC fields initial reports for pollution and railroad incidents and forwards that information to appropriate federal/state agencies for response. These data contain initial incident data that has not been validated or investigated by a federal/state response agency.

Government Publication Date: Nov 9, 2020
The Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) Brownfield Database: rr-FED BROWNFIELDS-bb Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties protects the environment, reduces blight, and takes development pressures off greenspaces and working lands. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Government Publication Date: Jan 6, 2021
Historical Gas Stations: rr-HIST GAS STATIONS-bb
This historic directory of service stations is provided by the Cities Service Company. The directory includes Cities Service filling stations that were located throughout the United States in 1930.

Government Publication Date: Jul 1, 1930
FEMA Underground Storage Tank Listing: rr-FEMA UST-bb
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) of the Department of Homeland Security maintains a list of FEMA owned underground storage tanks.

Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2017
Petroleum Refineries: rr-REFN-bb
List of petroleum refineries from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Refinery Capacity Report. Includes operating and idle petroleum refineries (including new refineries under construction) and refineries shut down during the previous year located in the 50 States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and other U.S. possessions. Survey locations adjusted using public data.

Government Publication Date: Jul 10, 2020
Petroleum Product and Crude Oil Rail Terminals: rr-BULK TERMINAL-bb List of petroleum product and crude oil rail terminals made available by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Includes operable bulk petroleum product terminals located in the 50 States and the District of Columbia with a total bulk shell storage capacity of 50,000 barrels or more, and/or the ability to receive volumes from tanker, barge, or pipeline; also rail terminals handling the loading and unloading of crude oil that were active between 2017 and 2018. Petroleum product terminals comes from the EIA-815 Bulk Terminal and Blender Report, which includes working, shell in operation, and shell idle for several major product groupings. Survey locations adjusted using public data.

Government Publication Date: Apr 28, 2020
LIEN on Property: rr-SEMS LIEN-bb
The EPA Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS) provides LIEN information on properties under the EPA Superfund Program.

Government Publication Date: Jan 28, 2021
Superfund Decision Documents: rr-SUPERFUND ROD-bb
This database contains a listing of decision documents for Superfund sites. Decision documents serve to provide the reasoning for the choice of (or) changes to a Superfund Site cleanup plan. The decision documents include Records of Decision (ROD), ROD Amendments, Explanations of Significant Differences (ESD), along with other associated memos and files. This information is maintained and made available by the US EPA (Environmental Protection Agency).

Government Publication Date: Feb 23, 2021
State
ERNS 1987 TO 1989
ERNS

FED BROWNFIELDS

HIST GAS STATIONS

FEMA UST
REFN

BULK TERMINAL

SEMS LIEN

SUPERFUND ROD
217 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 State Response Sites: rr-RESPONSE-bb
A list of identified confirmed release sites where the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity. These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority and high potential risk. This database is state equivalent NPL.

Government Publication Date: Jan 13, 2021
EnviroStor Database: rr-ENVIROSTOR-bb
The EnviroStor Data Management System is made available by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). Includes Corrective Action sites, Tiered Permit sites, Historical Sites and Evaluation/Investigation sites. This database is state equivalent CERCLIS.

Government Publication Date: Jan 13, 2021
Delisted State Response Sites: rr-DELISTED ENVS-bb
Sites removed from the list of State Response Sites made available by the EnviroStor Data Management System, Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC).

Government Publication Date: Jan 13, 2021
Solid Waste Information System (SWIS): rr-SWF/LF-bb
The Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) database made available by the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) contains information on solid waste facilities, operations, and disposal sites throughout the State of California. The types of facilities found in this database include landfills, transfer stations, material recovery facilities, composting sites, transformation facilities, waste tire sites, and closed disposal sites.

Government Publication Date: Feb 8, 2021
Solid Waste Disposal Sites with Waste Constituents Above Hazardous Waste Levels: rr-SWRCB SWF-bb This is a list of solid waste disposal sites identified by California State Water Resources Control Board with waste constituents above hazardous waste levels outside the waste management unit.

Government Publication Date: Sep 20, 2006
EnviroStor Hazardous Waste Facilities: rr-HWP-bb
A list of hazardous waste facilities including permitted, post-closure and historical facilities found in the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) EnviroStor database.

Government Publication Date: Jan 13, 2021
Sites Listed in the Solid Waste Assessment Test (SWAT) Program Report: rr-SWAT-bb In a 1993 Memorandum of Understanding, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) agreed to submit a comprehensive report on the Solid Waste Assessment Test (SWAT) Program to the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB). This report summarizes the work completed to date on the SWAT Program, and addresses both the impacts that leakage from solid waste disposal sites (SWDS) may have upon waters of the State and the actions taken to address such leakage.

Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 1995
Construction and Demolition Debris Recyclers: rr-C&D DEBRIS RECY-bb This listing of Construction and Demolition Debris Recyclers is maintained by the California Intergrated Waste Management Board-common C&D materials include lumber, drywall, metals, masonry (brick, concrete, etc.), carpet, plastic, pipe, rocks, dirt, paper, cardboard, or green waste related to land development.

Government Publication Date: Jun 20, 2018
Recycling Centers: rr-RECYCLING-bb
This list of Certified Recycling Centers that are operating under the state of California's Beverage Container Recycling Program is maintained by the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery.

Government Publication Date: Nov 2, 2020
Listing of Certified Processors: rr-PROCESSORS-bb
This list of Certified Processors that are operating under the state of California's Beverage Container Recycling Program is maintained by the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery.

Government Publication Date: Oct 27, 2020
Listing of Certified Dropoff, Collection, and Community Service Programs: rr-CONTAINER RECY-bb This list of Certified Dropoff, Collection, and Community Service Programs (non-buyback) operating under the state of California's Beverage Container Recycling Program is maintained by the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery.

Government Publication Date: Dec 16, 2020

RESPONSE

ENVIROSTOR

DELISTED ENVS
SWF/LF

SWRCB SWF
HWP
SWAT

C&D DEBRIS RECY

RECYCLING

PROCESSORS

CONTAINER RECY
218 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Land Disposal Sites: rr-LDS-bb
Land Disposal Sites in GeoTracker, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)'s data management system. The Land Disposal program regulates of waste discharge to land for treatment, storage and disposal in waste management units. Waste management units include waste piles, surface impoundments, and landfills.

Government Publication Date: Nov 16, 2020
Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Reports: rr-LUST-bb
List of Leaking Underground Storage Tanks within the Cleanup Sites data in GeoTracker database. GeoTracker is the State Water Resources Control Board's (SWRCB) data management system for managing sites that impact groundwater, especially those that require groundwater cleanup (Underground Storage Tanks, Department of Defense and Site Cleanup Program) as well as permitted facilities such as operating Underground Storage Tanks. The Leak Prevention Program that overlooks LUST sites is the SWRCB in California's Environmental Protection Agency.

Government Publication Date: Nov 16, 2020
Delisted Leaking Storage Tanks: rr-DELISTED LST-bb
List of Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUST) cleanup sites removed from GeoTracker, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)'s database system, as well as sites removed from the SWRCB's list of UST Case closures.

Government Publication Date: Feb 2, 2021
Permitted Underground Storage Tank (UST) in GeoTracker: rr-UST-bb List of Permitted Underground Storage Tank (UST) sites made available by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) in California's Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Government Publication Date: Mar 23, 2021
Proposed Closure of Underground Storage Tank Cases: rr-UST CLOSURE-bb List of UST cases that are being considered for closure by either the California Environmental Protection Agency, State Water Resources Control Board or the Executive Director that have been posted for a 60-day public comment period.

Government Publication Date: Feb 2, 2021
Historical Hazardous Substance Storage Information Database: rr-HHSS-bb The Historical Hazardous Substance Storage database contains information collected in the 1980s from facilities that stored hazardous substances. The information was originally collected on paper forms, was later transferred to microfiche, and recently indexed as a searchable database. When using this database, please be aware that it is based upon self-reported information submitted by facilities which has not been independently verified. It is unlikely that every facility responded to the survey and the database should not be expected to be a complete inventory of all facilities that were operating at that time. This database is maintained by the California State Water Resources Control Board's (SWRCB) Geotracker.

Government Publication Date: Aug 27, 2015
Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System: rr-UST SWEEPS-bb The Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System (SWEEPS) is a historical listing of active and inactive underground storage tanks made available by the California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB).

Government Publication Date: Oct 1, 1994
Aboveground Storage Tanks: rr-AST-bb
A statewide list from 2009 of aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) made available by the Cal FIRE Office of the State Fire Marshal (OSFM). This list is no longer maintained or updated by the Cal FIRE OSFM.

Government Publication Date: Aug 31, 2009
SWRCB Historical Aboveground Storage Tanks: rr-AST SWRCB-bb A list of aboveground storage tanks made available by the California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). Effective January 1, 2008, the Certified Unified Program Agencies (CUPAs) are vested with the responsibility and authority to implement the Aboveground Petroleum Storage Act (APSA).

Government Publication Date: Dec 1, 2007
Oil and Gas Facility Tanks: rr-TANK OIL GAS-bb
Locations of oil and gas tanks that fall under the jurisdiction of the Geologic Energy Management Division of the California Department of Conservation (CalGEM) (CCR 1760). CalGEM was formerly the Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR).

Government Publication Date: Feb 12, 2021
LDS
LUST

DELISTED LST
UST

UST CLOSURE
HHSS

UST SWEEPS
AST

AST SWRCB

TANK OIL GAS
219 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Delisted Storage Tanks: rr-DELISTED TNK-bb
This database contains a list of storage tank sites that were removed by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) in California's Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Cal FIRE Office of State Fire Marshal (OSFM).

Government Publication Date: Mar 18, 2021
California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Tanks: rr-CERS TANK-bb List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Aboveground Petroleum Storage and Underground Storage Tank regulatory programs. The CalEPA oversees the statewide implementation of the Unified Program which applies regulatory standards to protect Californians from hazardous waste and materials.

Government Publication Date: Feb 9, 2021
Delisted California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Tanks: rr-DELISTED CTNK-bb This database contains a list of Aboveground Petroleum Storage and Underground Storage Tank sites that were removed from in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal.

Government Publication Date: Feb 9, 2021
Historical Hazardous Substance Storage Container Information - Facility Summary: rr-HIST TANK-bb The State Water Resources Control Board maintained the Hazardous Substance Storage Containers listing and inventory in th 1980s. This facility summary lists historic tank sites where the following container types were present: farm motor vehicle fuel tanks; waste tanks; sumps; pits, ponds, lagoons, and others; and all other product tanks. This set, published in May 1988, lists facility and owner information, as well as the number of containers. This data is historic and will not be updated.

Government Publication Date: May 27, 1988
Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Facility Sites with Land Use Restrictions: rr-LUR-bb The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program (SMBRP) list includes sites cleaned up under the program's oversight and generally does not include current or former hazardous waste facilities that required a hazardous waste facility permit. The list represents land use restrictions that are active. Some sites have multiple land use restrictions.

Government Publication Date: Jan 13, 2021
CALSITES Database: rr-CALSITES-bb
This historical database was maintained by the Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) for more than a decade. CALSITES contains information on Brownfield properties with confirmed or potential hazardous contamination. In 2006, DTSC introduced EnviroStor as the latest Brownfields site database.

Government Publication Date: May 1, 2004
Hazardous Waste Management Program Facility Sites with Deed / Land Use Restrictions: rr-HLUR-bb The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Hazardous Waste Management Program (HWMP) has developed a list of current or former hazardous waste facilities that have a recorded land use restriction at the local county recorder's office. The land use restrictions on this list were required by the DTSC HWMP as a result of the presence of hazardous substances that remain on site after the facility (or part of the facility) has been closed or cleaned up. The types of land use restriction include deed notice, deed restriction, or a land use restriction that binds current and future owners.

Government Publication Date: Feb 18, 2021
Deed Restrictions and Land Use Restrictions: rr-DEED-bb List of Deed Restrictions, Land Use Restrictions and Covenants in GeoTracker made available by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) in California's Environmental Protection Agency. A deed restriction (land use covenant) may be required to facilitate the remediation of past environmental contamination and to protect human health and the environment by reducing the risk of exposure to residual hazardous materials.

Government Publication Date: Nov 16, 2020
Voluntary Cleanup Program: rr-VCP-bb
List of sites in the Voluntary Cleanup Program made available by the Department of Toxic Substances and Control (DTSC). The Voluntary Cleanup Program was designed to respond to lower priority sites. Under the Voluntary Cleanup Program, DTSC enters site-specific agreements with project proponents for DTSC oversight of site assessment, investigation, and/or removal or remediation activities, and the project proponents agree to pay DTSC's reasonable costs for those services.

Government Publication Date: Jan 13, 2021
GeoTracker Cleanup Program Sites: rr-CLEANUP SITES-bb
A list of Cleanup Program sites in the state of California made available by The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) of the California Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). SWRCB tracks leaking underground storage tank cleanups as well as other water board cleanups.

DELISTED TNK

CERS TANK

DELISTED CTNK

HIST TANK
LUR

CALSITES
HLUR
DEED
VCP

CLEANUP SITES
220 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Government Publication Date: Nov 16, 2020
Delisted County Records: rr-DELISTED COUNTY-bb
Records removed from county or CUPA databases. Records may be removed from the county lists made available by the respective county departments because they are inactive, or because they have been deemed to be below reportable thresholds.

Government Publication Date: Apr 1, 2021
Tribal
Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUSTs) on Indian Lands: rr-INDIAN LUST-bb LUSTs on Tribal/Indian Lands in Region 9, which includes California.

Government Publication Date: Apr 8, 2020
Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) on Indian Lands: rr-INDIAN UST-bb USTs on Tribal/Indian Lands in Region 9, which includes California.

Government Publication Date: Apr 8, 2020
Delisted Tribal Leaking Storage Tanks: rr-DELISTED ILST-bb Leaking Underground Storage Tank facilities which have been removed from the Regional Tribal LUST lists made available by the EPA.

Government Publication Date: Apr 14, 2020
Delisted Tribal Underground Storage Tanks: rr-DELISTED IUST-bb Underground Storage Tank facilities which have been removed from the Regional Tribal UST lists made available by the EPA.

Government Publication Date: Apr 14, 2020
County
Santa Clara County - Historic Solvent Case Listing: rr-SANTACLARA HSOL-bb The Santa Clara Valley Water District was responsible for the oversight of solvent and toxic release cases and maintained a list of historic solvent cases in Santa Clara County.

Government Publication Date: Aug 22, 2016
Santa Clara County - Local Oversight Program Listing: rr-SANTACLARA LO-bb A list of Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUST) facilities in Santa Clara County Provided by Santa Clara Department of Environmental Health (DEH). Since July 1, 2004 the DEH has served as the oversight agency for investigations and clean-up of petroleum releases from underground storage tanks through implementation of the Local Oversight Program (LOP) contract with the State Water Resources Control Board.

Government Publication Date: Jun 14, 2017
Santa Clara County - Underground Storage Tanks: rr-UST SANTACLARA-bb List of underground storage tanks made available by the County of Santa Clara's Hazardous Materials Compliance Division.

Government Publication Date: Mar 9, 2021
Santa Clara County - CUPA Facilities List: rr-SANTACLARA CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in Santa Clara County. This list is made available by Santa Clara County Department of Environmental health (DEH). DEH's Hazardous Materials Compliance Division (HMCD) is CUPA for the county with jurisdiction within the Cities of Los Altos Hills, Monte Sereno, and Saratoga; and in all unincorporated areas of Santa Clara County, including Moffett Field, San Martin, and Stanford.

Government Publication Date: Mar 13, 2021
Santa Clara County - City of San Jose Hazardous Material Facilities: rr-SANJOSE HM-bb A list of facilities with hazardous materials, including underground and aboveground tanks. This list is maintained by the City of San Jose Fire Department.

Government Publication Date: Oct 15, 2020

DELISTED COUNTY

INDIAN LUST

INDIAN UST

DELISTED ILST

DELISTED IUST

SANTACLARA HSOL

SANTACLARA LO

UST SANTACLARA

SANTACLARA CUPA

SANJOSE HM
221 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Santa Clara County - Gilroy City CUPA Facilities List: rr-GILROY CUPA-bb The Gilroy City Fire Marshal's office maintains a list of CUPA Facilities located in Gilroy City.

Government Publication Date: Sep 21, 2020
Santa Clara County - Sunnyvale City CUPA List: rr-SUNNYVALE CUPA-bb A list of facilities associated with various Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) programs in Sunnyvale City, Santa Clara County. This list is made available by the Fire Prevention & Hazardous Materials division of the Sunnyvale Department of Public Safety.

Government Publication Date: Jul 16, 2019
Additional Environmental Record Sources
Federal
PFOA/PFOS Contaminated Sites: rr-PFAS NPL-bb
List of sites where PFOA or PFOS contaminants have been found in drinking water or soil. Made available by the Federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Government Publication Date: Mar 1, 2021
Facility Registry Service/Facility Index: rr-FINDS/FRS-bb The Facility Registry Service (FRS) is a centrally managed database that identifies facilities, sites, or places subject to environmental regulations or of environmental interest. FRS creates high-quality, accurate, and authoritative facility identification records through rigorous verification and management procedures that incorporate information from program national systems, state master facility records, and data collected from EPA's Central Data Exchange registrations and data management personnel. This list is made available by the Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA).

Government Publication Date: Nov 2, 2020
Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Program: rr-TRIS-bb
The EPA's Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) is a database containing data on disposal or other releases of over 650 toxic chemicals from thousands of U.

S. facilities and information about how facilities manage those chemicals through recycling, energy recovery, and treatment. One of TRI's primary purposes is to inform communities about toxic chemical releases to the environment.

Government Publication Date: Feb 19, 2020
Perfluorinated Alkyl Substances (PFAS) Releases: rr-PFAS TRI-bb List of Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) facilities at which the reported chemical is a Per- or polyfluorinated alkyl substance (PFAS) included in the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s consolidated PFAS Master List of PFAS Substances. The EPA's Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) is a database containing data on disposal or other releases of over 650 toxic chemicals from thousands of U.S. facilities and information about how facilities manage those chemicals through recycling, energy recovery, and treatment.

Government Publication Date: Feb 19, 2020
Perfluorinated Alkyl Substances (PFAS) Water Quality: rr-PFAS WATER-bb The Water Quality Portal (WQP) is a cooperative service sponsored by the United States Geological Survey (USGS), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the National Water Quality Monitoring Council (NWQMC). This listing includes records from the Water Quality Portal where the characteristic (environmental measurement) is in the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s consolidated PFAS Master List of PFAS Substances.

Government Publication Date: Jul 20, 2020
Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System: rr-HMIRS-bb US DOT - Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) Incidents Reports Database taken from Hazmat Intelligence Portal, U.S. Department of Transportation.

Government Publication Date: Sep 1, 2020
National Clandestine Drug Labs: rr-NCDL-bb
The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this data as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy.

Government Publication Date: Oct 5, 2020

GILROY CUPA

SUNNYVALE CUPA

PFAS NPL

FINDS/FRS
TRIS

PFAS TRI

PFAS WATER
HMIRS
NCDL
222 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Toxic Substances Control Act: rr-TSCA-bb
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is amending the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) section 8(a) Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) rule and changing its name to the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) rule.

The CDR enables EPA to collect and publish information on the manufacturing, processing, and use of commercial chemical substances and mixtures (referred to hereafter as chemical substances) on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory (TSCA Inventory). This includes current information on chemical substance production volumes, manufacturing sites, and how the chemical substances are used. This information helps the Agency determine whether people or the environment are potentially exposed to reported chemical substances. EPA publishes submitted CDR data that is not Confidential Business Information (CBI).

Government Publication Date: Apr 11, 2019
Hist TSCA: rr-HIST TSCA-bb
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is amending the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) section 8(a) Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) rule and changing its name to the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) rule.

The 2006 IUR data summary report includes information about chemicals manufactured or imported in quantities of 25,000 pounds or more at a single site during calendar year 2005. In addition to the basic manufacturing information collected in previous reporting cycles, the 2006 cycle is the first time EPA collected information to characterize exposure during manufacturing, processing and use of organic chemicals. The 2006 cycle also is the first time manufacturers of inorganic chemicals were required to report basic manufacturing information.

Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2006
FTTS Administrative Case Listing: rr-FTTS ADMIN-bb
An administrative case listing from the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), together known as FTTS. This database was obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) National Compliance Database (NCDB). The FTTS and NCDB was shut down in 2006.

Government Publication Date: Jan 19, 2007
FTTS Inspection Case Listing: rr-FTTS INSP-bb
An inspection case listing from the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), together known as FTTS. This database was obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) National Compliance Database (NCDB). The FTTS and NCDB was shut down in 2006.

Government Publication Date: Jan 19, 2007
Potentially Responsible Parties List: rr-PRP-bb
Early in the cleanup process, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) conducts a search to find the potentially responsible parties (PRPs). EPA looks for evidence to determine liability by matching wastes found at the site with parties that may have contributed wastes to the site.

Government Publication Date: Feb 23, 2021
State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing: rr-SCRD DRYCLEANER-bb The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners (SCRD) was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. Coalition members are states with mandated programs and funding for drycleaner site remediation. Current members are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin.

Government Publication Date: Nov 08, 2017
Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS): rr-ICIS-bb The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) is a system that provides information for the Federal Enforcement and Compliance (FE&C) and the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) programs. The FE&C component supports the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Civil Enforcement and Compliance program activities. These activities include Compliance Assistance, Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement. The NPDES program supports tracking of NPDES permits, limits, discharge monitoring data and other program reports.

Government Publication Date: Jan 6, 2021
Drycleaner Facilities: rr-FED DRYCLEANERS-bb
A list of drycleaner facilities from Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO) online search. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) tracks facilities that possess NAIC and SIC codes that classify businesses as drycleaner establishments.

Government Publication Date: Feb 17, 2021
Delisted Drycleaner Facilities: rr-DELISTED FED DRY-bb
List of sites removed from the list of Drycleaner Facilities (sites in the EPA's Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) with NAIC or SIC codes identifying the business as a drycleaner establishment).

Government Publication Date: Feb 17, 2021
TSCA

HIST TSCA

FTTS ADMIN

FTTS INSP
PRP

SCRD DRYCLEANER
ICIS

FED DRYCLEANERS

DELISTED FED DRY
223 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Formerly Used Defense Sites: rr-FUDS-bb
Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) are properties that were formerly owned by, leased to, or otherwise possessed by and under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Defense prior to October 1986, where the Department of Defense (DoD) is responsible for an environmental restoration. This list is published by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Government Publication Date: Jan 28, 2020
Former Military Nike Missile Sites: rr-FORMER NIKE-bb
This information was taken from report DRXTH-AS-IA-83A016 (Historical Overview of the Nike Missile System, 12/1984) which was performed by Environmental Science and Engineering, Inc. for the U.S. Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials Agency Assessment Division. The Nike system was deployed between 1954 and the mid-1970's. Among the substances used or stored on Nike sites were liquid missile fuel (JP-4); starter fluids (UDKH, aniline, and furfuryl alcohol); oxidizer (IRFNA); hydrocarbons (motor oil, hydraulic fluid, diesel fuel, gasoline, heating oil); solvents (carbon tetrachloride, trichloroethylene, trichloroethane, stoddard solvent); and battery electrolyte. The quantities of material a disposed of and procedures for disposal are not documented in published reports. Virtually all information concerning the potential for contamination at Nike sites is confined to personnel who were assigned to Nike sites. During deactivation most hardware was shipped to depot-level supply points. There were reportedly instances where excess materials were disposed of on or near the site itself at closure. There was reportedly no routine site decontamination.

Government Publication Date: Dec 1, 1984
PHMSA Pipeline Safety Flagged Incidents: rr-PIPELINE INCIDENT-bb A list of flagged pipeline incidents made available by the U.S. Department of Transportation (US DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). PHMSA regulations require incident and accident reports for five different pipeline system types.

Government Publication Date: Jul 7, 2020
Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS): rr-MLTS-bb
A list of sites that store radioactive material subject to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing requirements. This list is maintained by the NRC. As of September 2016, the NRC no longer releases location information for sites. Site locations were last received in July 2016.

Government Publication Date: Aug 5, 2020
Historic Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS) sites: rr-HIST MLTS-bb A historic list of sites that have inactive licenses and/or removed from the Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS). In some cases, a site is removed from the MLTS when the state becomes an "Agreement State". An Agreement State is a State that has signed an agreement with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) authorizing the State to regulate certain uses of radioactive materials within the State.

Government Publication Date: Jan 31, 2010
Mines Master Index File: rr-MINES-bb
The Master Index File (MIF) contains mine identification numbers issued by the Department of Labor Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) for mines active or opened since 1971. Note that addresses may or may not correspond with the physical location of the mine itself.

Government Publication Date: Nov 3, 2020
Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act Sites: rr-SMCRA-bb An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE) to provide information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory contains information on the location, type, and extent of Abandoned Mine Land (AML) impacts, as well as information on the cost associated with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing problems are reclaimed.

Government Publication Date: Dec 18, 2020
Mineral Resource Data System: rr-MRDS-bb
The Mineral Resource Data System (MRDS) is a collection of reports describing metallic and nonmetallic mineral resources throughout the world.

Included are deposit name, location, commodity, deposit description, geologic characteristics, production, reserves, resources, and references. This database contains the records previously provided in the Mineral Resource Data System (MRDS) of USGS and the Mineral Availability System/Mineral Industry Locator System (MAS/MILS) originated in the U.S. Bureau of Mines, which is now part of USGS. The USGS has ceased systematic updates of the MRDS database with their focus more recently on deposits of critical minerals while providing a well-documented baseline of historical mine locations from USGS topographic maps.

Government Publication Date: Mar 15, 2006
Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Sites: rr-URANIUM-bb FUDS

FORMER NIKE

PIPELINE INCIDENT
MLTS

HIST MLTS
MINES
SMCRA
MRDS

URANIUM
224 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 The Legacy Management Office of the Department of Energy (DOE) manages radioactive and chemical waste, environmental contamination, and hazardous material at over 100 sites across the U.S. The L.M. Office manages this database of sites registered under the Uranium Mill Tailings Control Act (UMTRCA).

Government Publication Date: Mar 4, 2017
Alternative Fueling Stations: rr-ALT FUELS-bb
List of alternative fueling stations made available by the US Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy. Includes Biodiesel stations, Ethanol (E85) stations, Liquefied Petroleum Gas (Propane) stations, Ethanol (E85) stations, Natural Gas stations, Hydrogen stations, and Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE). The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) obtains information about new stations from trade media, Clean Cities coordinators, a Submit New Station form on the Station Locator website, and through collaborating with infrastructure equipment and fuel providers, original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), and industry groups.

Government Publication Date: Jan 18, 2021
Registered Pesticide Establishments: rr-SSTS-bb
List of active EPA-registered foreign and domestic pesticide-producing and device-producing establishments based on data from the Section Seven Tracking System (SSTS). The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) Section 7 requires that facilities producing pesticides, active ingredients, or devices be registered. The list of establishments is made available by the EPA.

Government Publication Date: Mar 31, 2020
Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Notifiers: rr-PCB-bb
Facilities included in the national list of facilities that have notified the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) activities. Any company or person storing, transporting or disposing of PCBs or conducting PCB research and development must notify the EPA and receive an identification number.

Government Publication Date: Nov 19, 2020
State
Dry Cleaning Facilities: rr-DRYCLEANERS-bb
A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes: power laundries, family and commercial, linen supply, commercial laundry, dry cleaning and pressing machines - Coin Operated Laundry and Dry Cleaning. This is provided by the Department of Toxic Substance Control.

Government Publication Date: Feb 22, 2021
Delisted Drycleaners: rr-DELISTED DRYCLEANERS-bb
Sites removed from the list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers, made available by the California Department of Toxic Substance Control.

Government Publication Date: Feb 22, 2021
Non-Toxic Dry Cleaning Incentive Program: rr-DRYC GRANT-bb A list of grant recipients of the Non-Toxic Dry Cleaning Incentive Program made available by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). The program provides grants to eligible dry cleaning businesses to assist them in transitioning away from PERC machines to alternative non-toxic and non-smog forming technologies.

Government Publication Date: Feb 28, 2018
Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS): rr-PFAS-bb
List of sites from the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)'s GeoTracker at which one or more of the potential contaminants of concern are in the PFAS Master List of PFAS Substances made available by the Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA).

Government Publication Date: Nov 16, 2020
PFOA/PFOS Groundwater: rr-PFAS GW-bb
A list of water wells from the Groundwater Ambient Monitoring and Assessment Program (GAMA) Groundwater Information System with the groundwater chemical perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) (NL = 0.014 UG/L) or perfluorooctanoic sulfonate (PFOS) (NL = 0.013 UG/L). The GAMA Groundwater Information System search is made available by California Water Boards.

Government Publication Date: Oct 22, 2020
Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List - Site Cleanup: rr-HWSS CLEANUP-bb

ALT FUELS
SSTS
PCB

DRYCLEANERS

DELISTED DRYCLEANERS

DRYC GRANT
PFAS

PFAS GW

HWSS CLEANUP
225 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 The Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites (Cortese) List is a planning document used by the State, local agencies and developers to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act requirements in providing information about the location of hazardous materials release sites. This list is published by California Department of Toxic Substance Control.

Government Publication Date: Nov 10, 2020
List of Hazardous Waste Facilities Subject to Corrective Action: rr-DTSC HWF-bb This is a list of hazardous waste facilities identified in Health and Safety Code (HSC) § 25187.5. These facilities are those where Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has taken or contracted for corrective action because a facility owner/operator has failed to comply with a date for taking corrective action in an order issued under HSC § 25187, or because DTSC determined that immediate corrective action was necessary to abate an imminent or substantial endangerment.

Government Publication Date: Jul 18, 2016
EnviroStor Inspection, Compliance, and Enforcement: rr-INSP COMP ENF-bb A list of permitted facilities with inspections and enforcements tracked in the Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) EnviroStor.

Government Publication Date: Oct 7, 2020
School Property Evaluation Program Sites: rr-SCH-bb
A list of sites registered with The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) School Property Evaluation and Cleanup (SPEC) Division. SPEC is responsible for assessing, investigating and cleaning up proposed school sites. The Division ensures that selected properties are free of contamination or, if the properties were previously contaminated, that they have been cleaned up to a level that protects the students and staff who will occupy the new school.

Government Publication Date: Jan 13, 2021
California Hazardous Material Incident Report System (CHMIRS): rr-CHMIRS-bb A list of reported hazardous material incidents, spills, and releases from the California Hazardous Material Incident Report System (CHMIRS). This list has been made available by the California Office of Emergency Services (OES).

Government Publication Date: Jan 21, 2021
Historical California Hazardous Material Incident Report System (CHMIRS): rr-HIST CHMIRS-bb A list of reported hazardous material incidents, spills, and releases from the California Hazardous Material Incident Report System (CHMIRS) prior to 1993. This list has been made available by the California Office of Emergency Services (OES).

Government Publication Date: Jan 1, 1993
Hazardous Waste Manifest Data: rr-HAZNET-bb
A list of hazardous waste manifests received each year by Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). The volume of manifests is typically 900,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 450,000 - 500,000 shipments.

Government Publication Date: Oct 24, 2016
Historical Hazardous Waste Manifest Data: rr-HIST MANIFEST-bb A list of historic hazardous waste manifests received by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) from year the 1980 to 1992. The volume of manifests is typically 900,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 450,000 - 500,000 shipments.

Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 1992
DTSC Registered Hazardous Waste Transporters: rr-HW TRANSPORT-bb The California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) maintains this list of Registered Hazardous Waste Transporters.

Government Publication Date: Oct 19, 2020
Registered Waste Tire Haulers: rr-WASTE TIRE-bb
This list of registered waste tire haulers is maintained by the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery.

Government Publication Date: Dec 16, 2020
California Medical Waste Management Program Facility List: rr-MEDICAL WASTE-bb This list of Medical Waste Management Program Facilities is maintained by the California Department of Public Health. The Medical Waste Management Program (MWMP) regulates the generation, handling, storage, treatment, and disposal of medical waste by providing oversight for the implementation of the Medical Waste Management Act (MWMA). The MWMP permits and inspects all medical waste off-site treatment facilities, medical waste transporters, and medical waste transfer stations. This list contains transporters, treatment, and transfer facilities.

Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2020

DTSC HWF

INSP COMP ENF
SCH
CHMIRS

HIST CHMIRS
HAZNET

HIST MANIFEST

HW TRANSPORT

WASTE TIRE

MEDICAL WASTE
226 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Historical Cortese List: rr-HIST CORTESE-bb
List of sites which were once included on the Cortese list. The Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites (Cortese) List is a planning document used by the State, local agencies and developers to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act requirements for providing information about the location of hazardous sites.

Government Publication Date: Nov 13, 2008
Cease and Desist Orders and Cleanup and Abatement Orders: rr-CDO/CAO-bb The California Environment Protection Agency "Cortese List" of active Cease and Desist Orders (CDO) and Cleanup and Abatement Orders (CAO). This list contains many CDOs and CAOs that do NOT concern the discharge of wastes that are hazardous materials. Many of the listed orders concern, as examples, discharges of domestic sewage, food processing wastes, or sediment that do not contain hazardous materials, but the Water Boards' database does not distinguish between these types of orders.

Government Publication Date: Feb 16, 2012
California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Hazardous Waste Sites: rr-CERS HAZ-bb List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the following regulatory programs:

Hazardous Chemical Management, Hazardous Waste Onsite Treatment, Household Hazardous Waste Collection, Hazardous Waste Generator, RCRA LQ HW Generator. The CalEPA oversees the statewide implementation of the Unified Program which applies regulatory standards to protect Californians from hazardous waste and materials.

Government Publication Date: Feb 9, 2021
Delisted Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Hazardous Waste Sites: rr-DELISTED HAZ-bb This database contains a list of sites that were removed from the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) in the following regulatory programs: Hazardous Chemical Management, Hazardous Waste Onsite Treatment, Household Hazardous Waste Collection, Hazardous Waste Generator, RCRA LQ HW Generator.

Government Publication Date: Nov 29, 2018
Sites in GeoTracker: rr-GEOTRACKER-bb
GeoTracker is the State Water Resource Control Boards' data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. This is a list of sites in GeoTracker that aren't otherwise categorized as LUST, Land Disposal Sites (LDS), Cleanup Sites, or sites having Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR). This listing includes program types such as Underground Injection Control (UIC), Confined Animal Facilities (CAF), Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program, plans, and non-case information.

Government Publication Date: Nov 16, 2020
Mines Listing: rr-MINE-bb
This list includes mine site locations extracted from the Mines Online database, maintained by the California Department of Conservation. Mines Online (MOL) is an interactive web map designed with GIS features that provide information such as the mine name, mine status, commodity sold, location, and other mine specific data. Please note: Mine location information is provided to assist experts in determining the location of mine operators in accordance with California Civil Code section 1103.4 and reflects information reported by mine operators in annual reports provided under Public Resources Code section 2207. While the Division of Mine Reclamation (DMR) attempts to populate MOL with accurate location information, the DMR cannot guarantee the accuracy of operator reported location information.

Government Publication Date: Jan 12, 2021
Recorded Environmental Cleanup Liens: rr-LIEN-bb
The California Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) maintains this list of liens placed upon real properties. A lien is utilized by the DTSC to obtain reimbursement from responsible parties for costs associated with the remediation of contaminated properties.

Government Publication Date: Nov 16, 2020
Waste Discharge Requirements: rr-WASTE DISCHG-bb
List of sites in California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) Program in California, made available by the SWRCB via GeoTracker. The WDR program regulates point discharges that are exempt pursuant to Subsection 20090 of Title 27 and not subject to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. The scope of the WDRs Program also includes the discharge of wastes classified as inert, pursuant to section 20230 of Title 27.

Government Publication Date: Nov 16, 2020
Toxic Pollutant Emissions Facilities: rr-EMISSIONS-bb
A list of criteria and toxic pollutant emissions data for facilities in California made available by the California Environmental Protection Agency - Air Resources Board (ARB). Risk data may be based on previous inventory submittals. The toxics data are submitted to the ARB by the local air districts as requirement of the Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Program. This program requires emission inventory updates every four years.

Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2018

HIST CORTESE

CDO/CAO

CERS HAZ

DELISTED HAZ

GEOTRACKER
MINE
LIEN

WASTE DISCHG

EMISSIONS
227 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 Clandestine Drug Lab Sites: rr-CDL-bb
The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) maintains a listing of drug lab sites. DTSC is responsible for removal and disposal of hazardous substances discovered by law enforcement officials while investigating illegal/clandestine drug laboratories.

Government Publication Date: Jan 19, 2021
Tribal
No Tribal additional environmental record sources available for this State.

County
No County additional environmental databases were selected to be included in the search.

CDL
228 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040600167 h-Definitions
Database Descriptions: This section provides a detailed explanation for each database including: source, information available, time coverage, and acronyms used. They are listed in alphabetic order.

Detail Report: This is the section of the report which provides the most detail for each individual record. Records are summarized by location, starting with the project property followed by records in closest proximity.

Distance: The distance value is the distance between plotted points, not necessarily the distance between the sites' boundaries. All values are an approximation.

Direction: The direction value is the compass direction of the site in respect to the project property and/or center point of the report.

Elevation: The elevation value is taken from the location at which the records for the site address have been plotted. All values are an approximation.

Source: Google Elevation API.

Executive Summary: This portion of the report is divided into 3 sections:
'Report Summary'- Displays a chart indicating how many records fall on the project property and, within the report search radii. 'Site Report Summary'-Project Property'- This section lists all the records which fall on the project property. For more details, see the 'Detail Report' section.
'Site Report Summary-Surrounding Properties'- This section summarizes all records on adjacent properties, listing them in order of proximity from the project property. For more details, see the 'Detail Report' section.

Map Key: The map key number is assigned according to closest proximity from the project property. Map Key numbers always start at #1. The project property will always have a map key of '1' if records are available. If there is a number in brackets beside the main number, this will indicate the number of records on that specific property. If there is no number in brackets, there is only one record for that property.

The symbol and colour used indicates 'elevation': the red inverted triangle will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Lower Elevation', the yellow triangle will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Higher Elevation' and the orange square will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Same Elevation.' Unplottables: These are records that could not be mapped due to various reasons, including limited geographic information. These records may or may not be in your study area, and are included as reference.

Definitions

APPENDIX E

SITE ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST AND

ASTM TRANSACTION SCREEN AND ENVIRONMENTAL SITE

ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE

APPENDIX F

PERTINENT INFORMATION FOR PRIOR INVESTIGATION
APN 015-48-006
logica
Innovative Strategies for Environmental and
Natural Resource Management
5 Third Street, Suite 808 [email protected]
San Francisco, California 94103 www.geologicagroup.com
Phone: (415) 722-3629 ~ Fax: (888) 858-1382
December 6, 2018
Terra Development, LLC
461 S. Milpitas Blvd, Suite 1
Milpitas, CA 95035
Attention: Ms. Trang TuNguyen

LETTER REPORT

SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATIONS

SOIL VAPOR, SOIL & GROUNDWATER TESTING

FORMER PIN HIGH GOLF CENTER PARCELS
4701 NORTH FIRST STREET

SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA

Dear Ms. TuNguyen:

1.0 INTRODUCTION
GEOLOGICA INC. (GEOLOGICA) is pleased to present this Letter Report (Report) describing Subsurface Investigations comprising soil vapor, soil, and groundwater testing at the above-referenced property (Figure 1). It is our understanding that the property is to be redeveloped for various commercial / retail uses; residential occupancy is not being contemplated. The scope of work discussed in this Report was developed based on discussions with Ms. Trang TuNguyen and Mr. Cleet Carlton of the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). The Work Plan for this investigation, dated August 29, 2018, was submitted to the RWQCB and was later modified in a comment response letter to the RWQCB dated October 23, 2018, which addressed comments from the RWQCB.

This Letter Report also references a concurrent soil, soil vapor, and groundwater investigation undertaken on behalf of one of the future tenants, Top Golf, by Intertek PSI, and described in a report, included as an appendix, entitled Subsurface Investigation Report (PSI, 2018). The purpose of that work was to assess subsurface conditions in key areas of the future Top Golf facility, both for construction-related purposes and to assess issues potentially associated with future occupancy.

Dec 6, 2018
Subsurface Investigation Report
4701 North First Street
San Jose, CA

2.0 BACKGROUND
As noted in our Phase II Soil & Groundwater Investigation Report (GEOLOGICA, 2016) and in previous work by E2C (2004b), low level exceedances of the 2016 RWQCB ESLs for petroleum hydrocarbons, metals, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and other constituents have been noted at scattered, essentially random, locations across the site in soil and, to a lesser extent, groundwater. These exceedances appear to be largely related to historic undocumented fill placed over the entire site in the past and do not preclude commercial / industrial development of the property as intended. Given that the site is to be developed for commercial use and will be completely paved or otherwise covered/capped, the expectation is that no remedial work is necessary. Since unknown or uninvestigated areas of the site could contain low levels of TPH, metals, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) or other constituents, a Soil Management Plan (SMP) has been developed and submitted to the RWQCB. The SMP was approved by the RWQCB on September 7, 2018 and provides guidelines for such activities as, but necessarily limited to, the following:

Site grading to address soil stockpile management,
Soil Stockpiling,
Soil testing/waste classification for off-site disposal, Dust control,
Stormwater & groundwater (if encountered) management,
Worker safety.

As noted earlier, any excess soils to be removed from the property will require testing for appropriate disposal at a designated facility under the site-specific Soil Management Plan (SMP). Based on the test results, we expect that most soils will be appropriate for disposal at a Class II facility. However, some soils could classify as hazardous waste, based on lead content or other constituents, and thus require disposal at a Class I facility.

3.0 PURPOSE OF WORK PERFORMED
The purpose of the work outlined herein was to respond to specific concerns expressed by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Case Officer for the Site, Mr. Cleet Carlton, during a recent site visit on May 11, 2018. These included:

Vapor Intrusion Assessment of the potential for a vapor intrusion/soil vapor condition at the site related to the possible presence of low levels of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the fill or in groundwater beneath the property.

Dec 6, 2018
Subsurface Investigation Report
4701 North First Street
San Jose, CA
Lateral Extent of TPH at boring GP-2 in Parcel 6 Evaluation of the extent of an apparent petroleum
groundwater previously in a subsurface investigation conducted by GEOLOGICA (2016) in the southwest corner (Parcel 6) of the property at location GP-2. The RWQCB Case Officer agreed that, depending on the nature and extent of the hot spot, it may be appropriate to leave the material in place given future use plans, and address impacts as necessary through the SMP, or potentially to remove it by excavation if a discrete area of impact can be identified. This area is east of the future Top Golf development and is not currently targeted for development. (PSI, 2018): Subsurface Investigation Report - It should be noted that one of the future tenants of a portion of the property, Top Golf, independently contracted for soil, soil vapor, and groundwater testing at the property inside the boundaries of the future Top Golf entertainment facility/business center acreage. Their report, prepared by Intertek PSI, dated October 2, 2018, and entitled Subsurface Investigation Report (PSI, 2018), is appended to this report and their results are incorporated into the general discussion of results. The purpose of that work was to assess subsurface conditions in key areas of the future Top Golf facility, both for construction-related purposes and to assess issues potentially associated with future occupancy including vapor intrusion.

4.0 SCOPE OF WORK
The following sections discuss the details of the GEOLOGICA work performed.

Sampling and boring locations are illustrated on Figure 2. Task 1 Preliminary Activities This task included procurement and scheduling of subcontractors, coordination with on-site personnel, obtaining necessary permits / access, marking proposed soil boring locations and notifying Underground Services Alert (USA) to identify utilities approaching the site. Drilling at the site did not require a drilling permit from the Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD).

Task 2 Field Program Our field program included activities to evaluate soil vapor, soil, and groundwater quality on the property (see Figure 2), as follows:

Task 2a - Soil Vapor Survey. GEOLOGICA engaged a licensed driller, Environmental Control Associates Inc. (ECA) of Santa Cruz, CA, to complete temporary soil vapor probes on the subject property. On October 29-30, 2018, ECA installed two soil vapor probes at each of ten survey locations (SV-1 to SV-10) across the Site. At each survey location, temporary soil vapor probes were completed at depths of 5 ft and 10 ft below ground surface (bgs). Four sets of soil vapor probes (SV-1 to SV-4) were advanced on the northern parcel, adjacent to North First Street, which has been identified for retail and possible hotel development. Six sets of soil vapor probes (SV- Dec 6, 2018
Subsurface Investigation Report
4701 North First Street
San Jose, CA
5 to SV-10) were advanced on the Top Golf development parcel, beneath the anticipated location of the future entertainment center/conference building.

This soil vapor survey was conducted in accordance with the DTSC/RWQCB July 2015 Advisory Soil Gas Investigation guidelines for collection of soil gas samples for ESLs. Prior to sampling, a
flow test was conducted at each temporary soil vapor probe using a clean 60-milliliter (ml) syringe and vacuum gauge. All soil vapor probes met the DTSC criteria to be sampled. Groundwater was not encountered in any of the deeper borings. Soil vapor samples were collected in clean, 1.4-liter stainless steel summa canisters provided by the analytical laboratory. Each summa canister was equipped with a clean, dedicated flow regulator to limit the purge rate to 150 ml per minute (ml/min) in accordance with DTSC guidance. During sampling, a plastic box was set over the well head to form a leak check shroud. Then a piece of paper towel moistened with a leak check compound (isopropyl alcohol) was placed under the shroud to check for direct leakage into the well head tubing assembly or leakage around the surface well seal during sampling. After sampling, the borings were sealed in accordance with SCVWD regulations.

Task 2b - Parcel 6 Soil & Groundwater Testing. Eight soil borings were advanced to depths of 12 to 28 ft bgs at eight - from the GEOLOGICA (2016) GP-2 location, where elevated TPH in soil and groundwater was previously detected, as detailed below.
10 ft Step-Out Borings - Four locations were sited approximately 10 ft north, south, east, and west of GP-2 (GP-2-10N, GP-2-10S, GP-2-10E, and GP-2- 10W). These borings were advanced to 24 or 28 ft bgs for both groundwater and soil sampling.
20-ft Step-Out Borings - The other four locations were sited approximately 20 ft north, south, east, and west of GP-2 (GP-2-20N, GP-2-20S, GP-2-20E, and GP-2-20W) and were advanced to 12 ft bgs for soil sampling only.

These step-out locations supplemented previous step-out borings that were completed approximately 50 ft and 150 ft from GP-2 (GEOLOGICA, 2016). The soil borings were advanced using a truck-mounted direct push/vibratory hammer drill rig by ECA on October 30-31, 2018. Continuous sample cores were collected during drilling using dual-wall drill rod to minimize carry-down. Observations regarding soil characteristics at the boring locations were recorded in a field notebook. Soil samples were collected from sample intervals exhibiting visual or olfactory indications of contamination and/or at approximately 4, 8, and 12 ft bgs. Samples were screened in Dec 6, 2018
Subsurface Investigation Report
4701 North First Street
San Jose, CA
the field using a hand-held photoionization detector (PID) to screen for the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons.

Groundwater Testing - After encountering groundwater in the step-out borings located 10 ft away from GP-2, g were collected
from each of the four boring locations (GP-2-10N, GP-2-10S, GP-2-10E, and GP-2-10W).

Once the groundwater table was reached casing
equipped with 5 ft of slotted screen was installed in each boring to facilitate groundwater sampling. Groundwater samples were collected using peristaltic pump fitted with clean, dedicated tubing to fill laboratory-supplied sample containers. After sampling, the borings were grouted in accordance with SCVWD regulations.

Task 3 - Laboratory Testing Soil vapor, soil, and groundwater samples collected during the field program were submitted to an off-site California-certified analytical laboratory following chain-of-custody procedures. Our testing program consisted of the following:

Soil Vapor Testing. Two soil vapor samples (5-foot and 10-foot) per location (total of 20 samples) were submitted to a California-certified laboratory, Analytical Sciences in Petaluma, CA. Soil vapor samples were analyzed for VOCs by EPA Method TO-15.

Soil Testing. Three discrete soil samples collected from each of the 10-ft step-out borings (GP-2-10N, GP-2-10S, GP-2-10E, and GP-2-10W) and two discrete soil samples collected from each of the 20-ft step-out borings (GP-2-20N, GP-2-20S, GP2-20E, and GP-2-20W) were submitted to a California-certified laboratory, Enthalpy Analytical, in Berkeley, CA for analysis. All soil samples were tested for TPH-d and TPH-mo by EPA Method 8015M with and without silica-gel cleanup to remove natural organic carbon. All sample results were reported on a dry weight basis.

Groundwater Testing. Four (4) were analyzed for
TPH-d and TPH-mo by EPA Method 8015M by Enthalpy Analytical in Berkeley, CA. Samples for TPH analysis were processed both with and without silica-gel cleanup to remove natural organic carbon.

Task 4 Investigation Derived Waste Management Drill cuttings and equipment decontamination water (aka IDW) were contained in 55-gallon DOT-approved drums that are stored onsite pending receipt of testing results. Depending on the analytical testing results, IDW will be disposed appropriately at approved, licensed facilities. Depending on Dec 6, 2018
Subsurface Investigation Report
4701 North First Street
San Jose, CA
the timing of field activities, IDW may be disposed of with other planned soil/water disposal activities.

5.0 SOIL VAPOR, SOIL & GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
The following sections describe the results of the subsurface testing. The corresponding laboratory reports are included in Appendix A. 5.1 Soil & Groundwater Conditions Based on borings advanced for the current study to depths varying from 12 to 28 ft below ground surface (bgs), the site is immediately underlain by non-engineered fill material comprising clayey sands and sandy clays. Occasional concrete and asphalt fragments have been noted in the fill material in the past, but probe refusal did not occur.

Groundwater was encountered at depths of approximately 10 to 14 feet bgs at the Site in October 2018. The boring locations were not surveyed so a site-specific groundwater flow direction could not be determined. Generally northwesterly flow towards the Guadalupe River and San Francisco bay is expected.

5.2 Soil Vapor Testing Results
Analytical results from the 20 collected soil vapor samples are summarized in Table 1 and presented on Figure 3. All reported constituent concentrations were below their current respective RWQCB Commercial/Industrial (C/I) Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs) for Evaluation of Potential Vapor Intrusion. In general, concentrations appeared to be slightly higher at the 10 ft depth than at the 5 ft depth. Key detections were as follows:

Results suggest relatively widespread and consistent low-level detections of the fuel-related VOCs: benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX).

Benzene was detected at concentrations up to 58 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3).

Chlorinated solvents, tetrachloroethane (PCE), trichloroethane (TCE), cis-1,2- dichloroethene (cis-DCE), and trans-1,2-dichloroethene (trans-DCE), were reported at only one soil vapor sample location, SV-9. PCE was detected at the 5 ft depth at 22 µg/m3, but not at the 10 ft depth, while TCE, cis-DCE, and transDCE were detected at the 10 ft depth only at concentrations ranging from 44 to 68 µg/m3. The leak check compound, isopropyl alcohol, was not reported in any soil vapor sample.

Dec 6, 2018
Subsurface Investigation Report
4701 North First Street
San Jose, CA

5.3 Parcel 6 GP-2 Step-Out Testing
The following sections present the results of testing in the previously identified apparent in the eastern portion of the site near GP-2 (east of the Top Golf acreage). Relevant investigation data from GEOLOGICA (2016) have been incorporated into the following discussion and figures.

5.3.1 Soil Analytical Results
Testing results of the soil collected in October 2018 samples are summarized in Table 2 and presented on Figure 4. The corresponding laboratory reports are included in Appendix A. Table 2 incorporates soil data from GEOLOGICA (2016) such that the table presents the original detections at GP-2 itself, plus results from step-out soil borings in the four compass directions of 10 ft, 20 ft, and 50 ft from GP-2. Results of samples collected from a 150 ft step-out boring to the east were also included as well. Key results were as follows:

TPH-d In 2016, TPH-d was reported in initial boring GP-2 soil samples at concentrations of up to 1,400 mg/kg at an 8 ft depth. In the 2018 step-out borings, TPH-d levels ranged up to 610 mg/kg in the GP-2-E at an 8 ft depth, which was a step-out boring 50 ft to the east of the original GP-2 location.

TPH-mo In 2016, TPH-mo was reported in initial boring GP-2 soil samples at concentrations of up to 4,800 mg/kg, also at a depth of 8 ft bgs. In the 2018 step-out borings, TPH-mo levels ranged up to 2,300 mg/kg in the GP-2-10W at 8 ft bgs, a step-out boring 10 ft to the west.

Discussion All detected TPH-d and TPH-mo concentrations were below the RWQCB Direct Exposure Commercial/Industrial ESL of 1,100 and 140,000 mg/kg, respectively. TPH-d numbers were also consistently below the leaching to groundwater ESL of 3,600 mg/kg.

5.3.2 Groundwater Analytical Results
Results from the groundwater samples collected in October 2018 are summarized in Table 3 and presented on Figure 5. The corresponding laboratory reports are included in Appendix A. Table 3 incorporates groundwater data from GEOLOGICA (2016) such that the table presents the original detections at GP-2 itself, plus step-out grab groundwater samples in the four compass directions at distances of 10 ft and 50 ft from GP-2. A 150 ft step-out groundwater sample to the east was also included as well. Key results were as follows:

Dec 6, 2018
Subsurface Investigation Report
4701 North First Street
San Jose, CA
TPH-d In 2016, TPH-d was reported in the initial boring GP-2 groundwater sample at a concentration of 1,900 micrograms per liter (ug/L) with silica gel cleanup (SGCU). TPH-d was reported in the 2018 step-out borings completed 10 ft north, south, east, and west of GP-2 at concentrations ranging from 69 to 260 ug/L without SGCU but was only reported in the northern step-out boring at 92 ug/L with SGCU.

TPH-d was detected in the northern and southern step-out borings completed in 2016 at a distance of 50 ft from GP-2 at concentrations of 380 and 81 ug/L, respectively, with SGCU. TPH-d was also reported in the 2016 step-out boring completed 150 ft east of GP-2 at a concentration of 130 ug/L with SGCU.

TPH-mo In 2016, TPH-mo was reported in the initial boring GP-2 groundwater sample at concentration of 10,000 ug/L with SGCU. TPH-mo was reported in the 2018 step-out borings completed 10 ft north, south, and west of GP-2 at concentrations ranging from 420 to 2,100 ug/L without SGCU but was only reported in the northern step-out boring at 1,300 ug/L with SGCU. TPH-mo was detected in the northern, eastern, and southern step-out borings completed in 2016 at a distance of 50 ft from GP-2 at concentrations ranging from 220 to 1,100 ug/L with SGCU.

TPH-mo was also reported in the 2016 step-out boring completed 150 ft east of GP-2 at a concentration of 310 ug/L with SGCU.

Discussion TPH-d testing results exceeded the RWQCB Tier 1 ESL for TPH-d (100 ug/L) at several locations. The Tier 1 ESL is based on the MCL; it should be noted that groundwater in the area is not identified as a source of drinking water. TPH-d ESLs based on aquatic habitat (640 ug/l) and gross contamination (2,500 ug/l) were nowhere exceeded, except at GP-2. It should be noted that the laboratory report indicated that the TPH-d detections do nor match the diesel standard. Compounds identified as diesel probably reflect a degraded motor oil or other lubricant.

The TPH-mo testing results nowhere exceeded the gross contamination ESL of 50,000 ug/L. However, the RWQCB has concluded that motor oil is insoluble and that motor oil detections in groundwater are likely petroleum degradates. The RWQCB has suggested combining TPH-d and TPH-mo results for comparison to the TPH-d standards. This approach would suggest groundwater ESL exceedances at GP2 and possibly 10 ft and 50 ft to the north of GP-2.

6.0 SUMMARY OF PSI (2018): SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION REPORT Top Golf, the future entertainment facility / conference center tenant, independently contracted for soil, soil vapor, and groundwater testing at the property inside the boundaries of the future Top Golf acreage. Their report, prepared by Intertek PSI, dated October 2, 2018, and entitled Subsurface Investigation Report (PSI, 2018), is Dec 6, 2018
Subsurface Investigation Report
4701 North First Street
San Jose, CA
included as Appendix B. The purpose of that work was to assess subsurface conditions in key areas of the future Top Golf facility, both for construction-related purposes and to assess issues potentially associated with future occupancy including vapor intrusion.

6.1 PSI (2018) Scope of Work
The PSI (2018) scope of work included the following:

Soil Vapor Sampling - Installation and sampling of five (5) soil vapor probes (SV-1 through SV-5) in August 2018 within the footprint of the future Top Golf building complex. Five summa cannisters were submitted for analytical testing for VOCs by TO-15. All samples were collected at 5 ft bgs. The PSI soil vapor sampling locations are indicated on Figure 2. Soil & Groundwater Sampling - Advancement and sampling of nine (9) directpush borings (B1 through B9) at various locations within the future Top Golf acreage. Two to three soil samples were tested from each boring. Grab groundwater samples were tested from four of the borings. Soil samples were tested for a broad suite of parameters including: TPH-g, TPH-d, TPH-mo; VOCs; and CAM 17 metals. Groundwater samples were tested for: TPH-g, TPH-d, TPHmo; and VOCs.

6.2 PSI (2018) Testing Results
Soil Vapor Testing Results In general, a broader suite of VOCs was detected in the PSI (2018) survey than in the current GEOLOGICA study. VOCs detected in PSI (2018) are summarized below:
o BTEX - The BTEX compounds were broadly detected in all five of the probes consistent with the current study. Benzene detections ranged from 7.3 to 41 µg/m3. o Chlorinated Solvents PCE, TCE, and cis-DCE were detected in one or more probes. In contrast to the current GEOLOGICA study, PCE was detected at every probe location with a maximum detection of 260 µg/m3. o Other VOCs Various other volatile chemicals were detected in one or more samples at low levels including: acetone, carbon disulfide, Dec 6, 2018
Subsurface Investigation Report
4701 North First Street
San Jose, CA
isopropanol, chloroform, cyclohexane, heptane, styrene, freon-11, and several others.

Soil Testing Results Detections in soil samples are summarized below:
o TPH Consistent with the GEOLOGICA (2016) studies, and excluding boring B4 in the eastern acreage of the site, no TPH-g was detected, but TPH-d and TPH-mo were detected in every other boring at relatively low levels: TPH-d was detected up to 330 mg/kg and TPHmo was detected up to 3,700 mg/kg. In boring B4, however, visual evidence of petroleum hydrocarbon contamination was noted with maximum detections as follows: TPH-g (120 mg/kg); TPH-d (940 mg/kg); and TPH-mo (7,000 mg/kg). The B4 location is not coincident with GP-2 in the current study. The location of boring B4 is indicated on Figure 2. o VOCs VOCs were generally not detected in soil except again at boring B4 where a suite of volatiles was detected including the following maximum values: benzene (24 ug/kg); PCE (740 ug/kg); TCA (590 ug/kg); TCE (610 ug/kg); vinyl chloride (290 ug/kg); naphthalene (120 ug/kg); and others.
o Metals No significant issues were identified for metals. Minor scattered ESL exceedances were noted for nickel, mercury, and arsenic. Off-site soil disposal may require WET testing based on lead and chromium concentrations.

Groundwater Testing Results - Detections in groundwater samples are summarized below:
o TPH No TPH-g or TPH-mo was detected. TPH-d was detected in two borings (B1 and B4) at levels up to 430 ug/L. Boring B1 is near the 2016 GP-2 boring.

VOCs VOCs were detected in two borings (B1 and B4) at the following maximum concentrations: PCE (5.9 ug/L); TCA (13 ug/L); TCE (14 ug/L); 1,1-DCE (33 ug/L); vinyl chloride (3.0 ug/L).

Dec 6, 2018
Subsurface Investigation Report
4701 North First Street
San Jose, CA

7.0 DISCUSSION
The following sections provide further discussion of the results.

7.1 Soil Vapor Survey Results
The site is expected to be developed into all commercial spaces and entirely capped with paving1or buildings. Based on the results of the two soil gas surveys presented in this report and the current 2016 commercial/industrial vapor intrusion ESLs, soil vapor detections do not indicate a significant risk of contaminated vapors migrating into the future Top Golf development, future hotel, or future retail spaces.

However, we understand that the State Water Resources Control Board, the San Francisco Bay RWQCB, and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), are currently developing a supplemental vapor intrusion guidance document for conducting uniform vapor intrusion evaluations in California. This guidance has not yet been issued, but we understand that the new guidance will result in more stringent vapor intrusion screening levels for soil gas by incorporating the USEPA-recommended attenuation factor of

0.03 for all soil gas. Key commercial / industrial ESLs that would result based on the new attenuation factor are estimated to be as follows: PCE (70 µg/m3); TCE (100 µg/m3); and, benzene (14 µg/m3). GEOLOGICA soil gas testing results reported herein largely meet even the anticipated new ESLs. However, the PSI (2018) soil vapor results exhibit several potential exceedances of the estimated 2019 PCE ESL in three out of their five soil vapor samples (up to 260 µg/m3). Given the discrepancy in detections between the two soil vapor surveys, it may be appropriate to collect additional soil vapor data in the area of the future Top Golf building or to conduct further human health risk evaluation to assess the best path forward regarding possible mitigation action in the future Top Golf building.

7.2 Parcel 6 Soil and Groundwater Results
The original concern about the boring GP-2 location was largely driven by the elevated detection in groundwater of TPH-mo (10,000 ug/L), which potentially suggested either significant groundwater contamination or a significant petroleum hydrocarbon soil source was present near GP-2. Step-out testing of soil has now been undertaken at distances of 10 ft, 20 ft, 50 ft, and to the east 150 ft, from GP-2; step-out groundwater testing has been undertaken at 10ft, 50 ft, and to the east 150 ft from GP-2.

Step-out testing suggests that the elevated TPH-mo detection in groundwater at the GP-2 location is highly isolated and anomalous; it may actually reflect incorporation 1 The Top Golf golf driving range facility is not surfaced with turf; it comprises a high-tech, impervious surface.

Dec 6, 2018
Subsurface Investigation Report
4701 North First Street
San Jose, CA
of TPH-contaminated soil into the water sample. Soil and groundwater testing for TPH-d and TPH-mo in the step out borings in the vicinity of GP-2 indicated sporadic TPH detections similar to other areas of the site where variable, low level detections of TPH-d and TPH-mo are typical. It does not appear that a discrete area of sufficiently distinct elevated TPH-containing soil has been identified for removal. Given that this area of the site is not targeted for redevelopment, we recommend no further action in the area; any development in this area would follow the SMP for handling of impacted material.

8.0 CONCLUSIONS
Soil Vapor Two soil vapor surveys were conducted in the areas of future development. Given the expectation that soil vapor ESLs may decline significantly as part of new RWQCB vapor intrusion guidance and that potential (future) exceedances were noted in one of the surveys, it may be appropriate to collect additional soil vapor data in the area of the future Top Golf building or to conduct further human health risk evaluation to assess the best path forward with regard to possible mitigation action.

Soil & Groundwater - As noted in the current work, in GEOLOGICA (2016), and in previous work by E2C (2004b), sporadic detections of various compounds including the TPH compounds, VOCs, and metals are present in soil and, to a lesser extent groundwater, across the site. These essentially random detections appear related to historic fill placed over the entire property and contaminants evidently distributed within that fill. In some cases, these comprise exceedances of the 2016 RWQCB ESLs. Given that the site is to be developed for commercial use and will be completely paved or otherwise covered and encapsulated, removal of these exceedances both in the GP-2 area and the PSI (2018) B4 area does not appear necessary or practical. The Soil Management Plan has been developed to detail procedures to manage low level contamination when subsurface work or grading is anticipated.

Dec 6, 2018
Subsurface Investigation Report
4701 North First Street
San Jose, CA
Should you have any questions about this Report
Brian at (415) 722-3629.

Sincerely,
GEOLOGICA INC. Daniel W. Matthews, R.G. Brian F. Aubry, R.G., C.E.G., C.Hg.

Associate Hydrogeologist Principal
Attachments:

Figure 1 Site Location Map
Figure 2 Soil Vapor Probe and Soil Boring Location Map
Figure 3 Summary of Soil Vapor Analytical Results
Figure 4 Summary of Soil Analytical Results
Figure 5 Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results
Table 1 Summary of Soil Vapor Analytical Results
Table 2 Summary of Soil Analytical Results
Table 3 Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results
Appendix A Laboratory Analytical Testing Reports
Appendix B PSI (2018) Subsurface Investigation Report
Approx. Future Hotel Location Approx. Future Retail Building Location Approx. Top Golf Building Location SV-1 SV-2 SV-3 SV-4 SV-5 SV-6 SV-7 SV-8 SV-9 SV-10 0 Approximate Scale in feet150 N 4701 North First Street San Jose, California Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results Figure 5 Soil Boring ID Analyte Concentration / Analyte concentration with silica-gel cleanup (ug/L) ND Not Dectected B4 Key Soil and "Grab" Groundwater Sample Location Soil Sample Location Soil Vapor Sampling Location Previous Soil Sampling Location (2016) Previous Step-out Soil and “Grab” Groundwater Sample Location (2016) PSI (2018) Soil Boring B4 (estimated location) PSI (2018) Soil Vapor Sample (estimated location) B4 TPH-d GP-2-E2130 TPH-mo 310 TPH-dGP-2-END TPH-mo 310 TPH-dGP-2-WND TPH-mo ND TPH-dGP-2-S 81 TPH-mo TPH-d 220 GP-2-N380 TPH-mo 1,100 *Silica-gel clean up was used in TPH analysis of 2016 soil samples Approx. Future Hotel Location Approx. Future Retail Building Location Approx. Top Golf Building Location SV-1 SV-2 SV-3 SV-4 SV-5 SV-6 SV-7 SV-8 SV-9 SV-10 0 Approximate Scale in feet150 N 4701 North First Street San Jose, California Summary of Soil Analytical Results Figure 4Soil Boring ID Depth of Soil Sample (feet) Analyte Concentration / Analyte concentration with silica-gel cleanup (mg/Kg) ND Not Dectected B4 Key Soil and "Grab" Groundwater Sample Location Soil Sample Location Soil Vapor Sampling Location Previous Soil Sampling Location (2016) Previous Step-out Soil and “Grab” Groundwater Sample Location (2016) PSI (2018) Soil Boring B4 (estimated location) PSI (2018) Soil Vapor Sample (estimated location) B4 Analyte concentration exceeds C/I ESL *Silica-gel clean up was used in TPH analysis of 2016 soil samples 1,400 Approx. Future Hotel Location Approx. Future Retail Building Location Approx. Top Golf Building Location 0 Approximate Scale in feet150 N 4701 North First Street San Jose, California Summary of Soil Vapor Analytical Results GP-2-10S GP-2-20S GP-2-20E GP-2-10E GP-2-10W GP-2-20W GP-2 GP-2-10W GP-2-20W Key Soil and "Grab" Groundwater Sample Location Soil Sample Location Soil Vapor Sampling Location Previous Soil Sampling Location (2016) PSI (2018) Soil Boring B4 (estimated location) PSI (2018) Soil Vapor Sample (estimated location) Figure 3Soil Vapor Boring ID Depth of Soil Vapor Sample (feet bgs) Analyte Concentration (ug/m3) * Not Dectected Previous Step-out Soil and “Grab” Groundwater Sample Location (2016) GP-2-E2 GP-2-E GP-2-S GP-2-W GP-2-W B4 B4 Approx. Future Hotel Location Approx. Future Retail Building Location Approx. Top Golf Building Location SV-1 SV-2 SV-3 SV-4 SV-5 SV-6 SV-7 SV-8 SV-9 0 Approximate Scale in feet150 N 4701 North First Street San Jose, California Soil Vapor Probe and Soil Boring Location Map GP-2-10S GP-2-20S GP-2-20E GP-2-10E GP-2-10W GP-2-20W GP-2 GP-2-10W GP-2-20W GP-2-E2 GP-2-E GP-2-S GP-2-W GP-2-W B4 SV-10 Key Soil and "Grab" Groundwater Sample Location Soil Sample Location Soil Vapor Sampling Location Previous Soil Sampling Location (2016) Previous Step-out Soil and “Grab” Groundwater Sample Location (2016) PSI (2018) Soil Boring B4 (estimated location) PSI (2018) Soil Vapor Sample (estimated location) B4

APPENDIX G

PERTINENT INFORMATION FOR PRIOR INVESTIGATIONS
4701 N FIRST STREET
logica
Report
Phase II Soil & Groundwater
Investigation
Pin High Golf Center & 3 Adjacent Parcels
4701 North First Street
San Jose, California 95002
Submitted to:

Terra Hospitality, Inc.

March 17, 2016
Prepared by:

Geologica Inc. 220 4th Street, Suite 201
Oakland, California 94607
Phone: (415) 597-7888
Fax: (888) 858-1382

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION & PURPOSE ............................................................................................................ 1 2 SITE DESCRIPTION & HISTORY ........................................................................................................ 1

2.1 Site Location and Description .......................................................................................... 1

2.2 Property Summary History ............................................................................................... 2 3 SURFACE & SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ....................................................................................... 2

3.1 Topography ........................................................................................................................ 3

3.2 Soil Conditions .................................................................................................................. 3

3.3 Surface Water .................................................................................................................... 3

3.4 Groundwater Conditions ................................................................................................... 4 4 PREVIOUS SITE INVESTIGATIONS ................................................................................................... 4

4.1 Geotechnical Engineering Reports .................................................................................. 4

4.1.1 USE (1985): Preliminary Soil & Foundation Investigation / Piezometer Installation ............................................................................................................ 4

4.1.2 Terrasearch (1987): Geotechnical Feasibility Evaluation .................................. 5

4.1.3 USE (2001): Updated Geotechnical Investigation .............................................. 5

4.2 Environmental Investigation reports ............................................................................... 5

4.2.1 E2C (1996): Phase I & II Environmental Site Assessment ................................. 6

4.2.2 E2C (2004a): Precursor Summary Phase I Environmental Assessment .......... 6

4.2.3 E2C (2004b): Phase II Environmental Site Assessment .................................... 6 5 SCOPE OF WORK ............................................................................................................................... 8

5.1 Initial Soil & Groundwater Testing January 2016 ....................................................... 8

5.1.1 Preliminary Activities ........................................................................................... 9

5.1.2 .......................................... 9

5.1.3 Drilling and Soil Sampling procedures ............................................................... 9

5.1.4 Soil analytical Testing Program ........................................................................ 10

5.1.5 ..................................................... 10

5.1.6 Groundwater Analytical Testing Program ........................................................ 11

5.2 Supplemental Soil & Groundwater Testing February 2016 ..................................... 11

5.2.1 Supplemental Soil Sampling & Testing ............................................................ 11

5.2.2 Supplemental Groundwater Sampling .............................................................. 12 6 SOIL AND GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS ................................................................... 12

6.1 Soil and Groundwater Conditions .................................................................................. 12

6.1.1 Soils Encountered at the Site ............................................................................ 12

6.1.2 Groundwater Occurrence .................................................................................. 12

6.2 Soil Sampling Analytical Results ................................................................................... 13

6.2.1 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) ............................................................... 13

6.2.2 Pesticides ............................................................................................................ 13

6.2.3 Metals .................................................................................................................. 14

6.2.4 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) .................................................................... 14

6.2.5 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) ............................................................... 14

6.3 Groundwater Sampling Analytical Results ................................................................... 14

6.3.1 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) ............................................................... 15

6.3.2 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) ............................................................... 16

6.3.3 Dissolved Metals ................................................................................................ 16 7 SUMMARY & DISCUSSION .............................................................................................................. 16

7.1 Review of Previous and Current Results ....................................................................... 16

7.2 Soil .................................................................................................................................... 16

7.2.1 Overview ............................................................................................................. 16

7.2.2 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ......................................................................... 17

7.2.3 Metals .................................................................................................................. 17

7.2.4 Other Constituents ............................................................................................. 17

7.2.5 Soil Testing Implications for Redevelopment .................................................. 18

7.3 Groundwater .................................................................................................................... 18

7.3.1 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) ............................................................... 18

7.3.2 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) ............................................................... 18 8 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................................... 19 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................ 21

FIGURES
TABLES

APPENDICES
1 INTRODUCTION & PURPOSE
Figure 1
2 SITE DESCRIPTION & HISTORY

2.1 Site Location and Description
Figure 1
Figure 1

2.2 Property Summary History
Section 4
3 SURFACE & SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Section 4

3.1 Topography
Section 2.2
Section 3.2

3.2 Soil Conditions

3.3 Surface Water
Figure 1

3.4 Groundwater Conditions
Figure 1
4 PREVIOUS SITE INVESTIGATIONS

4.1 Geotechnical Engineering Reports

4.1.1 USE (1985): PRELIMINARY SOIL & FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION / PIEZOMETER INSTALLATION

4.1.2 TERRASEARCH (1987): GEOTECHNICAL FEASIBILITY EVALUATION

4.1.3 USE (2001): UPDATED GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION

4.2 Environmental Investigation reports
Section 4.2.4
Tables A-1 A-4 Appendix A.

Appendix A
Figure 2a
Figure 2b.

Figure 3

4.2.1 E2C (1996): PHASE I & II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

4.2.2 E2C (2004A): PRECURSOR SUMMARY PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

4.2.3 E2C (2004B): PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Tables A-1 A-4 Appendix A.

Appendix A
Table A-1 A-4 Appendix A.

Figure 2a
Figure 2b.

Figure 3
Appendix A

4.2.4 OFF-SITE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
5 SCOPE OF WORK
Section 6

5.1 Initial Soil & Groundwater Testing January 2016

5.1.1 PRELIMINARY ACTIVITIES

5.1.2 SOIL AND GROUNDWATER RAB SAMPLING LOCATIONS
Figures 4 5

5.1.3 DRILLING AND SOIL SAMPLING PROCEDURES

5.1.4 SOIL ANALYTICAL TESTING PROGRAM

5.1.5 GROUNDWATER GRAB SAMPLING PROCEDURES

5.1.6 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL TESTING PROGRAM

5.2 Supplemental Soil & Groundwater Testing February 2016 Figure 4 5

5.2.1 SUPPLEMENTAL SOIL SAMPLING & TESTING
Section 5.1

5.2.2 SUPPLEMENTAL GROUNDWATER SAMPLING
6 SOIL AND GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS

6.1 Soil and Groundwater Conditions

6.1.1 SOILS ENCOUNTERED AT THE SITE

6.1.2 GROUNDWATER OCCURRENCE

6.2 Soil Sampling Analytical Results
Table 1, Figure 4
Table 1

6.2.1 TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (TPH)

6.2.2 PESTICIDES

6.2.3 METALS

6.2.4 POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBS)

6.2.5 VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOCS)

6.3 Groundwater Sampling Analytical Results
Table 2
Figure 5.

Table 2 Table 2

6.3.1 TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (TPH)

6.3.2 VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOCS)

6.3.3 DISSOLVED METALS
7 SUMMARY & DISCUSSION

7.1 Review of Previous and Current Results

7.2 Soil

7.2.1 OVERVIEW OF CURRENT AND PREVIOUS RESULTS
Section 3.2),
Section 4.2

7.2.2 TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
Figure 3
Figures 2a and 2b

7.2.3 METALS

7.2.4 PCBS

7.2.5 OTHER CONSTITUENTS

7.2.6 SOIL TESTING IMPLICATIONS FOR REDEVELOPMENT

7.3 Groundwater
Section 4.2.4

7.3.1 TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (TPH)

7.3.2 VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOCS)
Section 6.3.2
Section 4.2.4
8 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS
PCB Presence
the
detection of PCBs in soil in the vacant lots in excess of Previous Soil Testing Results: Vacant Lot Phase II Investigation San Jose, CA 95002 FIGURE 2a Former Santos Landfill Tri-Valley Excavating Former Marshland Landfill Library Youth Center School (Acreage Under Development) (Acreage Under Development) Cisco Site 6/ Syntax Ct. Disposal Site Vacant Acreage IBM Harmonic Vacant Acreage Pin High Golf Center Former Excel Landscape & Turner Equipment Verizon 015-39-027 fence River Meander Loop015-39-020 APN 015-39-020 APN 015-39-026 APN 015-39-027 APN 015-03-012 APN 015-03-018 10.81 acres 25.36 acres ~0.10 acres 1.376 acres 0.619 acres 015-39-026 “Lowland Area” logica Soil Sampling Location (E2C, 2004) Groundwater Sampling Location (E2C, 2004) Analyte concentration in groundwater in milligrams per kilogram (mg/Kg) Analyte concentration greater than Table S-1 or Table S-2 Enivronmental Screening Level (ESL) <50 Analyte not Detected above reporting limit 11 150 EXPLANATION Not Analyzed - SITE VICINITY MAP Pin High Acreage San Jose, CA 95002 FIGURE 1 Residential Residential Retail Community Center Residential Former Sainte Claire Landfill Residential & Storage Yards Former Santos Landfill Tri-Valley Excavating Former Marshland Landfill Library Youth Center School (Acreage Under Development) (Acreage Under Development) Cisco Site 6/ Syntax Ct. Disposal Site Vacant Acreage IBM Harmonic Vacant Acreage Pin High Golf Center RV Lot Former Excel Landscape & Turner Equipment Verizon 015-39-027 fence River Meander Loop015-39-020 015-03-012 015-03-018 APN 015-39-020 APN 015-39-026 APN 015-39-027 APN 015-03-012 APN 015-03-018 10.81 acres 25.36 acres ~0.10 acres 1.376 acres 0.619 acres015-39-026 “Lowland Area”

Analytes Units
Analytes Units
Analytes Units
logica
Submitted to:

Prepared by:

Geologica Inc.
logica
Innovative Strategies for Environmental and
Natural Resource Management
5 Third Street, Suite 808 [email protected]
San Francisco, California 94103 www.geologicagroup.com
Phone: (415) 722-3629 ~ Fax: (888) 858-1382
Work Plan Addendum
Work Plan Addendum
Subsurface Investigation Letter Report
Work Plan Addendum
Phase II Soil & Groundwater
Soil Vapor & Groundwater Testing
4701 North First Street
San Jose, CA
Investigation Report
Soil Vapor & Groundwater Testing
4701 North First Street
San Jose, CA
Phase II Subsurface Investigation
o
o
o
µ
Soil Vapor & Groundwater Testing
4701 North First Street
San Jose, CA
o
o
Soil Vapor & Groundwater Testing
4701 North First Street
San Jose, CA
Work Plan Addendum
Soil Vapor & Groundwater Testing
4701 North First Street
San Jose, CA
Soil Vapor & Groundwater Testing
4701 North First Street
San Jose, CA
µ
µ
Soil Vapor & Groundwater Testing
4701 North First Street
San Jose, CA
µ µ
µ
µ µ
Subsurface Investigations Soil Vapor, Soil & Groundwater Testing
Subsurface Investigation Report
Phase II Soil & Groundwater Investigation
Soil Vapor & Groundwater Testing
4701 North First Street
San Jose, CA
µ
µ µ µ
Soil Vapor & Groundwater Testing
4701 North First Street
San Jose, CA
µ
µ
µ
Soil Vapor & Groundwater Testing
4701 North First Street
San Jose, CA
Soil Vapor & Groundwater Testing
4701 North First Street
San Jose, CA

FIGURES

April 12, 2021
File No. 43S1202(NV)
TNT Land Development Services, Inc.

Attn: Trang Tu-Nguyen
1566 Davis Street
San Jose, CA 95126
[email protected]
Subject: Request by TNT Development services to forgo deed restriction at 4701 North 1st Street / 10 Topgolf Drive, San Jose
Dear Ms. Tu-Nguyen:

This letter responds to your request to waive the deed restriction requirement for the Topgolf venue located at 4701 North 1st Street, San Jose.

After reviewing your request, we have agreed to refrain from requiring a residential deed restriction at this time. Installation of a vapor barrier beneath the Topgolf property, in addition to clean pre-occupancy sub-slab vapor sampling results, indicate that the threat from the remaining subsurface contaminants is being properly mitigated for the present property usage.

However, the most recent subsurface investigation found multiple volatile organic compound (VOC) detections above residential environmental screening levels (ESLs) in both groundwater and soil vapor. While we recognize that current zoning prohibitions do not allow for residential development in this area, zoning laws are often revised.

Therefore, we reserve the right to re-impose a deed restriction requirement if zoning mandates in this area change to include residential development.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (510) 622-2336 or [email protected].

Sincerely,
Keith E. Roberson
Senior Engineering Geologist
Copy by email: [email protected]

APPENDIX H

SEMI-ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT

SYNTAX COURT DISPOSAL SITE

APPENDIX I

PERTINENT INFORMATION FOR PRIOR INVESTIGATIONS

SANTOS LANDFILL AREA
SEMS-RM DOCID # 100021504
[This page is intentionally left blank.]
South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site Five-Year Review i
Executive Summary
This is the fifth Five-Year Review of the South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site located in San Jose, California. The purpose of this Five-Year Review is to determine if the remedy is protective of human health and the environment.

The South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site (Site) is located in the Alviso district of San Jose, California, at the southern edge of San Francisco Bay. The Site includes a mix of residential, commercial, light industrial and agricultural land uses, and it covers an area of 550 acres. The Five-Year Review has been prepared because hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants remain at the Site above levels that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted exposure.

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) signed the Record of Decision (ROD) for the Ring Levee in 1988 and the remedy was completed in 1994.

EPA signed the ROD for the Overall Site in 1989 to address asbestos contamination at three landfills and four truck yards. The Santos, Marshland, and Sainte Claire Landfills were thought to have accepted asbestos waste from an asbestos cement pipe manufacturing plant. EPA selected the following remedies for the Site to protect long-term human health and the environment:

Paving asbestos-contaminated truck and industrial yards after soil sampling that determined the extent of necessary paving
Monthly wet sweeping of Alviso streets
Locating and removing obvious asbestos sources such as pipes and disposing of them in an off-site landfill
Placing deed restrictions on landfills after verifying the adequacy of cover material pursuant to National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) Program for asbestos.

Establishing institutional controls to ensure maintenance of remediation measures Routine maintenance and monitoring
EPA determined that paving four truck yards, removing and capping asbestos-contaminated soil, and wet sweeping of Alviso streets addressed the asbestos contamination.

EPA signed an Explanation of Significant Difference (ESD) on September 28, 2011, modifying the 1989 ROD remedies in two ways: wet sweeping of Alviso streets is no longer required to control asbestos in street dust, and the placement of deed restrictions is no longer required for the Marshland or Sainte Claire Landfills. EPA collected soil samples in 2004 and 2011 and determined that asbestos levels in the Sainte Claire Landfill were below the site cleanup level of one percent asbestos. The 2011 ESD also determined that the State of California institutional controls meet the deed restriction requirements in the 1989 ROD on the Marshland Landfill.

As part of the operation and maintenance of the landfill caps, EPA required Soil Management Plans for the Marshland and Santos landfills. The plans include monitoring, inspecting, reporting, notifying ii South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site Five-Year Review
government agencies and engineering requirements. EPA and state agencies must be notified prior to any redevelopment or construction activities.

The Santos and Marshland landfill caps have achieved the remedial action objectives to prevent inhalation of asbestos. The remedy for the truck yards is complete. Deed restrictions are in place at the Bixby Technology Center portion and the Summerset Mobile Estates portion of the Santos Landfill.

There is a governmental control for the Legacy America Center portion of the Marshland Landfill. All landfill caps are being maintained.

The remedy at South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site is protective of human health and the environment.

The asbestos exposure risk has been lowered to acceptable levels by removing asbestos containing material, installing and maintaining landfill caps, and implementing institutional controls at properties with landfill caps for asbestos containing material.

South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site Five-Year Review iii
Contents
Executive Summary.................................................................................................................. i List of Figures ..........................................................................................................................iv List of Tables ............................................................................................................................iv List of Abbreviations ...............................................................................................................iv

1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1

1.1. Background.................................................................................................................. 3

1.2. Physical Characteristics ............................................................................................... 3

1.3. Hydrology .................................................................................................................... 6

2. Remedial Actions Summary ............................................................................................. 6

2.1. Basis for Taking Action ................................................................................................ 6

2.2. Remedy Selection and Implementation ........................................................................ 6

2.3. Operation and Maintenance ......................................................................................... 9

3. Progress Since the Last Five-Year Review ..................................................................... 9

3.1. Previous Five-Year Review Protectiveness Statement and Issues ............................... 9

3.2. Work Completed at the Site During this Five-Year Review Period ..............................10

4. Five-Year Review Process ...............................................................................................11

4.1. Community Notification and Site Interviews ................................................................11

4.1.1. Five-Year Review Public Notice ...........................................................................11

4.2. Data Review ...............................................................................................................11

4.3. Site Inspection ............................................................................................................11

5. Technical Assessment ....................................................................................................12

5.1. Question A: Is the remedy functioning as intended by the decision documents? .........12

5.2. Question B: Are the exposure assumptions, Toxicity Data, Cleanup Levels, and Remedial Action Objectives Used at the Time of Remedy Selection Still Valid? ....................12

5.3. Question C: Has Any Other Information Come to Light That Could Call Into Question the Protectiveness of the Remedy? .......................................................................................13

6. Issues/Recommendations ...............................................................................................13

6.1. Other Findings ............................................................................................................13

7. Protectiveness Statement ...............................................................................................14

8. Next Review ......................................................................................................................14 Appendix A: List of Documents Reviewed .........................................................................15 Appendix B: Site Chronology..............................................................................................16 iv South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site Five-Year Review
Appendix C: ARAR Assessment.........................................................................................18 Appendix D: Press Notice ...................................................................................................21 Appendix E: Interview Forms ..............................................................................................22 Appendix F: Site Inspection Report and Photos ...............................................................24 List of Figures
Figure 1. Location Map for the South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site ..........................................4 Figure 2. Detailed Map for the South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site ........................................... 5 List of Tables
Table 1. Five-Year Review Summary Form ................................................................................ 2 Table 2. Summary of Institutional Controls ................................................................................. 8 Table 3. Status of Recommendations from the 2015 Five-Year Review ................................... 10 Table 4. Protectiveness Statement ........................................................................................... 14 List of Abbreviations
ARARs applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements bgs below ground surface
CCR California Code of Regulations
EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
ESD Explanation of Significant Differences
OSHA Operational Safety and Health Administration
ROD Record of Decision
South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site Five-Year Review 1

1. Introduction
The purpose of a Five-Year Review is to evaluate the effectiveness of a remedy to determine if the remedy is protective of human health and the environment. The Five-Year Review report documents the methods, findings, and conclusions. In addition, the Five-Year Review report identifies issues found during the review and recommends addressing them.

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is preparing this Five-Year Review pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act Section 121, 40 Code of Federal Regulation Section 300.430(f)(4)(ii) of the National Contingency Plan and EPA policy.

This is the fifth Five-Year Review for the South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site (Site). The triggering action is the completion date of the previous Five-Year Review. The Five-Year Review has been prepared due to the fact that hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants remain at the site above levels that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted exposure.

The Site consists of the Ring Levee and the Overall Site. The Ring Levee was constructed to prevent flooding of the Alviso District and it contained locally quarried rock with naturally occurring asbestos.

EPA completed an Explanation of Significant Differences (ESD) in 1993 to remove the Ring Levee, and to remove the temporary replacement levee. The Ring Levee and the temporary replacement levee were removed in 1994 and 1997, respectively. Since there was no asbestos contamination left in place, there is no requirement to conduct a Five-Year Review for the Ring Levee.

The Site includes three former landfills and four truck yards. The Marshland, Santos and Sainte Claire landfills accepted asbestos-containing material. In 2004, asbestos-contaminated soils were removed from the truck yards. Subsequently, EPA concluded that the asbestos contamination was effectively removed from the truck yards and no further action was required. In 2011, EPA completed an ESD which removed the requirement for institutional controls on Sainte Claire Landfill. The EPA determined that the asbestos level in the Sainte Claire landfill was below the action level. This Five-Year Review evaluates the remedy, operation and maintenance and deed restrictions for the Marshland and Santos Landfills in the Overall Site.

The South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site Five-Year Review began on October 3, 2019, and was led by Grace Ma of EPA Region 9, Remedial Project Manager for the Site. Participants included Kathryn Richwine, William Gardiner and Benino McKenna of the United States Army Corps of Engineers.

2 South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site Five-Year Review
Table 1. Five-Year Review Summary Form

SITE IDENTIFICATION
Site Name: South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site
EPA ID: 0902250 CERCLIS ID: CAD980894885
Region: 9 State: CA City/County: San Jose/Santa Clara County

SITE STATUS
NPL Status: Final
Multiple OUs? Yes Has the site achieved construction completion? Yes

REVIEW STATUS
Lead agency: EPA
[If “Other Federal Agency”, enter Agency name]: Author name (Federal or State Project Manager): Grace Ma Author affiliation: EPA Region 9
Review period: 10/2/2019 - 8/15/2020
Date of site inspection: 2/4/2020
Type of review: Statutory
Review number: 5
Triggering action date: 9/10/2015
Due date (five years after triggering action date): 9/15/2020 South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site Five-Year Review 3

1.1. Background
The South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site (Site) is located in the City of San Jose and County of Santa Clara in the southern extent of San Francisco Bay (Figure 1). The 550-acre Site includes the Alviso District and a mix of residential, commercial and light industrial land uses. Approximately 2,100 residents live in the Alviso District, which is part of the City of San Jose. This Site is located between Highway 237, Santa Clara, Milpitas, and new office developments to the east and northeast.

Asbestos-containing soil and rock were used to construct a ring levee to protect the low-lying areas of Alviso from flooding. In addition, Alviso landfills were thought to have received asbestos waste from an asbestos cement pipe manufacturing plant. Furthermore, local truck yards may have been contaminated with asbestos-containing soil and rock from the ring levee that had blown onto the truck yards. The South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site (Site) consists of two Operable Units: the Ring Levee (Operable Unit 1) and the Overall Site (Operable Unit 1).

Three landfills were located within the Site boundaries: the Santos, Marshland, and Sainte Claire Landfills (Figure 2). The Santos Landfill is subdivided into two separately owned parcels: the Summerset Mobile Home Estates and the Bixby Technology Center (currently known as Gold Street Tech Center).

The Marshland Landfill is also known as Highway 237 Landfill. The Legacy America Center (currently known as America Center) is located on the Marshland Landfill.

The Santos and Marshland Landfills were thought to have received asbestos waste from an asbestos cement pipe manufacturing plant from 1953-1982. Several types of waste were produced at the plant and transported to the landfills, including broken asbestos/cement pipe, machine and processing waste, and asbestos fiber bags. There were reports of Alviso residents using asbestos material to fill their yards and asbestos cement pipe to drain excess water from their properties before installation of curbs and gutters (EPA 2010). In addition, some areas within the Site, such as truck yards, may have been filled with asbestos-containing soils in order to raise the elevation of their properties to improve flood protection (EPA 2010).

1.2. Physical Characteristics
The Alviso District is prone to flooding due to its low elevation and proximity to San Francisco Bay. The Guadalupe River and Coyote Creek are located to the west and northeast of Alviso and enter San Francisco Bay. In 1963, the Santa Clara Valley Water District channelized the Guadalupe River to provide greater flood flow capacity. The river and creek are under tidal influence and therefore, high tides impede discharge to the Bay. Numerous salt evaporation ponds are present between Alviso and the Bay and they impede natural drainage into the Bay (EPA 1991). 4 South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site Five-Year Review

Figure 1. Location Map for the South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site Five-Year Review 5
Figure 2. Detailed Map for the South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site 6 South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site Five-Year Review

1.3. Hydrology
The South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site is located next to the Guadalupe River. The Guadalupe River, along with the Coyote Creek, Los Gatos Creek and Llagas Creek, forms a major drainage basin within the Santa Clara Valley. The Guadalupe River and Coyote Creek flow into San Francisco Bay immediately north of the Site. Tidal effects near the Bay make the Guadalupe River water brackish and unsuitable for beneficial use except for recreation (CDM et al. 1988). In addition, high concentrations of calcium, magnesium, and potassium were found in groundwater samples during the Remedial Investigation (CDM et al. 1988).

Santa Clara Valley aquifers are composed of unconsolidated to semi-consolidated alluvial materials derived from the surrounding mountain ranges. Tidal and marine deposits are interbedded with these alluvial materials, becoming thicker in areas near San Francisco Bay. Confined and unconfined groundwater aquifers occur in the Santa Clara Valley. Near the South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site, the native sediments are predominately fine-grained clays, silts, and sandy clays. Ancient stream channels at varying depths below the surface cut these beds of fine-grained material (EPA 2005). Wells and borings drilled for the 1988 Remedial Investigation encountered only clay and silty clay in the upper 20 to 30 feet below the site. The low permeability of the sediments resulted in very low flow rates during well sampling (CDM et al. 1988). Additional data and detailed maps are located in the 1998 Remedial Investigation report prepared for EPA by Camp Dresser and McKee.

The field investigations revealed that the groundwater table occurs between five and ten feet below ground surface (bgs) in Alviso. Groundwater flow direction at the Site is undetermined due to the flatness of the topography, the river, salt evaporation ponds, and water mounding at the Marshland Landfill (EPA 2005).

2. Remedial Actions Summary

2.1. Basis for Taking Action
EPA was concerned about the inhalation of asbestos from naturally occurring asbestos and asbestos containing materials. Asbestos is the only identified hazardous substance found at the Site.

2.2. Remedy Selection and Implementation
There are two Records of Decision for the Site: one for the Ring Levee, and one for the Overall Site. On September 29, 1988, the EPA signed the Record of Decision (ROD) to select a remedy addressing asbestos contamination in the Ring Levee. The remedy consisted of capping the Ring Levee in place. The remedial action objective of the selected remedy was to control the release of asbestos fibers from levee soils. The 1988 remedy was modified by a 1991 ROD Amendment and a 1993 Explanation of Significant Differences (ESD) to provide for removal and temporary replacement of the entire Ring Levee.

South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site Five-Year Review 7
The total removal of the asbestos-containing Ring Levee was completed in 1994 and removal of a temporary replacement levee was completed in 1997. Since there was no asbestos contamination left in place, there is no requirement for conducting a Five-Year Review for the Ring Levee.

The EPA signed the ROD for the Overall Site on September 29, 1989, selecting remedies to address asbestos contamination at three landfills and four truck yards. The landfills within the Site (Santos, Marshland, and Sainte Claire Landfills) contained asbestos waste from an asbestos cement pipe manufacturing plant (Figure 1). The remedial action objective of the selected remedy was to control the release of asbestos.

The remedy consisted of:

Paving asbestos-contaminated truck and industrial yards after sampling to determine extent of necessary paving
Wet sweeping of Alviso streets on a monthly basis
Locating and removing obvious asbestos sources such as pipes and disposing of them in an offsite landfill Placing deed restrictions on landfills after verifying the adequacy of cover material pursuant to National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) Program for asbestos Establishing institutional controls to ensure maintenance of remediation measures Routine maintenance and monitoring
The paving was completed by 1992 at the four truck yards using asphalt, concrete or chip seal pavement.

By November 2004, owners of all four truck yards had elected to excavate and dispose the contaminated soil off-site, thus removing any potential exposure from those properties. On the basis of the results of confirmation soil sampling, EPA concluded that the asbestos contamination was effectively removed from these properties, the remediation was completed, and no further action was required.

The City of San Jose conducted wet sweeping of Alviso streets on a monthly basis after the 1989 ROD was issued. In August 2007, EPA conducted additional activity-based sampling for asbestos in the Alviso community. EPA concluded that asbestos exposures from typical dust generating activities (including vehicular traffic on the streets) were below risk-based levels of concern. Therefore, the streets did not require any further wet sweeping.

At the time of the 1989 ROD, the landfill cap covers were in place and EPA determined that the covers met the asbestos control requirements. Land Use Covenants were placed on the Bixby Technology Center portion in 2004 and a Land Use Covenant1 was placed on the Summerset Mobile Home Estate portion of the Santos Landfill in 2011. A landfill closure statement for Marshland Landfill was recorded in 2007.

To ensure maintenance of remediation measures, EPA has required, through the deed restriction and Land Use Covenant, the development of Soil Management Plans. These plans include monitoring, inspecting, 1 The 2011 Explanation of Significant Differences clarified that the term “deed restriction” is now known as a Land Use Covenant.
8 South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site Five-Year Review
reporting requirements, and notification and engineering requirements if there is development on the landfill.

On September 28, 2011, an ESD was completed. This ESD removed the requirement for institutional controls on Sainte Claire Landfill and also removed the requirement for monthly wet street sweeping.

EPA determined that the asbestos level in the Sainte Claire landfill was below the action level of one percent asbestos in soil based on soil sampling results in 2004 and 2011. The ESD also determined that the existing Water Board requirements and the California Integrated Waste Management Board2 Titles 14 and 27 regulations meet the deed restriction requirements on the Marshland Landfill. Accordingly, a FiveYear Review is only required for the Marshland and the Santos Landfills.

EPA documented which properties need institutional controls in the 2011 ESD (Table 2). Institutional controls were added to minimize exposure to asbestos in areas, which were determined to pose a risk to human health and the environment.

Table 2. Summary of Institutional Controls
Location Institutional
Control Called for
in the Decision
Documents
Impacted
Parcels(s)
Objective Title of
Instrument
Implemented and
Date (or planned)
Santos Landfill,
Summerset
Mobile Estates
Land Use Covenant Assessor’s
Parcel No. 015-
34-043
Limits land use for the
Summerset Mobile
Home Park and sets up
reporting
requirements.

Covenant to restrict
use of Property
Environmental
Restriction,
recorded Sept. 14,
2011.

Santos Landfill,
Bixby
Technology
Center
Land Use Covenant Assessor’s
Parcel Nos.
015-34-027, 28,
81, 83, 84, and
90 Limits land use for the
Bixby Technology
Center and sets up
reporting
requirements.

Covenant and
Agreement for
Environmental
Restriction,
recorded October
21, 2004.

Marshland
Landfill, Legacy
America Center
Governmental
Control
Assessor’s
Parcel Nos.
015-45-011,
025, 027, 028,
029, and 030
Verifies that
requirements under
Titles 14 and 27 are
being implemented,
the cover is
maintained and cover
is routinely inspected.

Titles 14 and 27
CCR regulations
implemented by
the City of San
Jose. Landfill
closure recorded
Sept. 4, 2007. 2
California Integrated Waste Management Board’s responsibilities have now been transferred to the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle).

South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site Five-Year Review 9

2.3. Operation and Maintenance
The City of San Jose Local Enforcement Agency periodically monitors compliance with the institutional controls’ objectives. The City of San Jose is the lead enforcement agency and conducts annual inspections of the Site landfills to ensure compliance with the applicable Title 27 standards. In addition, all postclosure land uses must be designed and maintained to protect public health and safety, and must maintain the integrity of the cap. Landfill owners are required to file with the County of Santa Clara Office of the Clerk-Recorder and the City of San Jose, a detailed description of the landfill property including a map, boundaries of fill areas, closure date, location of closure and post-closure plans, and a statement that the future site use is restricted in accordance with the post-closure maintenance plan. In addition, landfill owners are required to: (1) notify prospective owners of the applicable standards, conditions of closure and compliance agreements and (2) notify the City of San Jose within 30 days of any property transfer (EPA 2010).

3. Progress Since the Last Five-Year Review

3.1. Previous Five-Year Review Protectiveness Statement and Issues The protectiveness statement from the 2015 Five-Year Review for the South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site stated the following:

The remedy at South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site is protective of human health and the environment.

The risk of exposure to asbestos has been lowered to acceptable levels by removing asbestoscontaining material or capping and implementing institutional controls at landfills with asbestoscontaining material.

No issues that affected the protectiveness of the remedy were noted during the 2015 Five-Year Review.

The 2015 Five-Year Review included five recommendations to improve performance of the remedy. 10 South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site Five-Year Review
Table 3. Status of Recommendations from the 2015 Five-Year Review Recommendations Current
Status
Current Implementation
Status Description
Completion
Date (if
applicable)
Assess the need for additional work, not
specified in the ROD, around the vacant lot
and unpaved truck yard where recent soil
disturbance is located.

Completed EPA reviewed previous
sampling and air monitoring
and concluded that it
adequately addressed the vacant
lot and truck yards. No future
work is needed at the truck yard
or vacant lot after reviewing the
existing data.
2015
Based on observations during the site
inspection, some asphalt parking lots and
driveways at the Bixby Tech Center require
repair and maintenance. Such activities if
conducted will ensure maintenance of the
remedy.

Completed Asphalt parking lots and
driveway maintenance and
repairs were done based on
observations during the site
inspection.
2/4/2020
The Legacy America Center Soil Management
Plan update and landfill cap inspection occurs
every five years. The landfill cap inspection
report should be submitted by October 1,
2019. In addition, the Legacy America Center
Soil Management Plan needs updates with this
due date requirement.

Completed The Legacy America Center
Soil Management Plan and the
landfill cap inspection report
were submitted.
4/3/2020
The Bixby Technology Center landfill cap
inspection report occurs every five years. The
next landfill cap inspection report should be
submitted by October 1, 2019.

Completed The Bixby Technology Center
landfill cap inspection report
was submitted.
2/25/2019
The Summerset Mobile Estates inspection
report occurs every thirty months. The next
inspection report should be submitted to EPA
by October 1, 2019.

Incomplete The Summerset Mobile Estates
inspection report still needs to
be prepared and submitted.

3.2. Work Completed at the Site During this Five-Year Review Period EKI, Inc. is the consultant for the Bixby Tech Center Marshland Landfill cap. EKI, Inc. submitted a January 2019 landfill cap inspection report that identified minor cracks and evidence of normal wear and tear on the eastern half of the Site (EKI 2019), although the cracks and damage were spread all over the landfill cap as documented in the 2015 Five-Year Review Report (EPA 2015). EKI, Inc. submitted a March 2020 landfill cap inspection report for the Five-Year Review Report (EKI 2020). Bixby Tech Center paid a contractor to repair the cracks in the asphalt landfill cap. EKI confirmed that the cracks in the eastern part of the asphalt landfill cap had been repaired and resurfaced. In addition, EKI, Inc. identified two issues that should be addressed:

Operational issues were identified with twelve passive methane gas vents atop posts. The vents were observed to be malfunctioning and therefore, not allow methane gas to vent from the soil.

South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site Five-Year Review 11
Exposed joints within the concrete surface were observed at three loading docks, located in between each set of buildings.

The America Center Maintenance Association submitted the Soil Management Update Report on April 3, 2020. The report is due every five years and it includes a site inspection, a review of the Soil Management Plan, and a review of the Site activities to assess if the soil plans and management are still working as intended. The landfill cap inspection report did not identify any significant erosion or damage to the landfill cap except for a settlement crack near one office building at 6201 America Center Drive.

As noted in the report, this crack did not extend to the clay layer of the cap and was scheduled to be repaired soon.

4. Five-Year Review Process

4.1. Community Notification and Site Interviews

4.1.1. Five-Year Review Public Notice
EPA published a public notice in the Santa Clara Weekly on February 25, 2020, stating that there was a Five-Year Review and inviting the public to submit any comments to the EPA. The Five-Year Review report will be available at the following locations:

Alviso Branch Library EPA Region 9 Superfund Records Center 5050 North First Street 75 Hawthorne Street
San Jose, California 95002 San Francisco, CA 94105
408-253-3626 415-820-4700

4.1.2. Site Interviews
During the Five-Year Review process, an interview was conducted to document any perceived problems or successes with the remedy that has been implemented to date. Mark Wheeler, the consultant for the America Center, submitted responses on April 3, 2020. Mr. Wheeler discussed the maintenance activities for the remedy over the past five years and the major construction activities that breached the cap. All activities were monitored for compliance with the Soil Management Plan. Mr. Wheeler noted that although there are no trespassing signs posted, hikers occasionally walk through the area. Security patrols for America Center will approach and tell people to leave the area.

4.2. Data Review
No analytical data were collected during this Five-Year Review Period.

4.3. Site Inspection
EPA and USACE conducted a Site inspection on February 4, 2020. No active remediation is currently being conducted on site.
12 South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site Five-Year Review
The EPA and USACE inspectors visited the Legacy America Center site, the Aloft Hotel, and the truck yards located on State Street in Alviso to inspect asphalt caps and view the status of each parcel. All asphalt caps associated with the site appear to be in good condition and well maintained (Appendix F).

The inspectors were unable to access vents at the America Center that were included in the 2015 FiveYear Review report. All wells located near the Aloft Hotel are secured, locked and in good condition and the passive methane gas vents located at the Bixby Technology Center appear to be in good working condition although several vents were not moving. The observed components of the remedy appear to be working as designed.

5. Technical Assessment

5.1. Question A: Is the remedy functioning as intended by the decision documents?
Yes, the remedy is operating and functioning as intended by the ROD and ESD for the Overall Site.

The Santos and Marshland Landfill caps have achieved the remedial action objectives to prevent direct contact with asbestos-contaminated soil and debris. EPA, CalRecycle, Regional Water Board and the City of Jose have monitored operation and maintenance of the landfill caps. EPA removed asbestoscontaminated soil and paved four truck yards as part of the remedy. The truck yards are still in service.

No further action is required and the remedy for the truck yards is complete.

The ROD required institutional controls for the Marshland and Santos Landfills. Land Use Covenants were placed on the Gold Street Technology Center portion in 2004 and the Summerset Mobile Estates portion in 2011 of the Santos Landfill. The Bixby Tech Center at the Marshland Landfill had a deed restriction placed in 2007. Institutional controls are in place at the Legacy America Center and at the Marshland Landfill to maintain and routinely inspect the cap. The parking lots at the Legacy America Center appear to be well maintained with little to no cracking or damage observable during the site inspection.

5.2. Question B: Are the exposure assumptions, Toxicity Data, Cleanup Levels, and Remedial Action Objectives Used at the Time of Remedy Selection Still Valid?
Yes. There are no substantive regulatory changes since the previous Five-Year Review. No chemical specific regulations or health-based standards for asbestos existed when the 1989 ROD was signed. EPA used quantitative risk characterization to determine the cleanup goals for the Site.

There have been no changes to the physical conditions of the Site that would negatively affect the protectiveness of the remedy. The removal of the Ring Levee in 1994, and paving truck yards in Alviso in 1992 eliminated or controlled major sources of asbestos exposure for the community. All landfill caps are intact and well maintained.

South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site Five-Year Review 13

5.3. Question C: Has Any Other Information Come to Light That Could Call Into Question the Protectiveness of the Remedy?
No weather-related events or natural disasters (flooding or earthquakes) have affected the protectiveness of the remedy. The United States Government Accountability Office 2019 report has an interactive map on potential climate change impacts on Superfund Sites. South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site is susceptible to the following hazards:

Highest flood hazard
Flooding at high tide with no additional sea level rise EPA should continue monitoring the operation and maintenance of landfill caps and ensuring landfill cap inspection reports are submitted on time. There is no other information that calls into question the protectiveness of the remedy.

6. Issues/Recommendations
There are no issues that affect protectiveness.

6.1. Other Findings
Bixby Tech Center is responsible for repairing any passive methane gas vents that are not functioning and allowing methane gas to vent. They are responsible for repairing exposed joints within the concrete surface at three loading docks. EPA and USACE identified cracks in the northern portion of the asphalt landfill cap that will need to be repaired before the 2025 Five-Year Review.

The following recommendation improves reliability of the remedy but does not affect current and/or future protectiveness: Summerset Mobile Estates did not submit a landfill cap inspection report, which is scheduled to occur every thirty months, for the 2020 EPA Five-Year Review Report. During the EPA and USACE 2019 Site Inspection, the asphalt cap was in excellent condition with no cracks or damage evident. EPA should consider conducting an intermediate cap inspection in 2023 if the Summerset Mobile Estates landfill cap inspection report is not submitted before then. 14 South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site Five-Year Review

7. Protectiveness Statement
Table 4. Protectiveness Statement
Sitewide Protectiveness Statement
Protectiveness Determination:

Protective
Protectiveness Statement:

The remedy at South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site currently protects human health and the environment because the risk of exposure to asbestos has been lowered to acceptable levels by removing asbestoscontaining material or capping and implementing institutional controls at landfills with asbestos containing material.

8. Next Review
The next Five-Year Review report for the South Bay Asbestos Superfund Site is required five years from the completion date of this review.

THE ESTUARY @ TERRA

NOISE AND VIBRATION ASSESSMENT
San José, California
October 2, 2020
Prepared for:

Desiree Dei Rossi
Assistant Project Manager
David J. Powers & Associates, Inc.
1736 Franklin Street, Suite 300
Oakland, CA 94612
Prepared by:

Michael S. Thill
429 East Cotati Avenue
Cotati, CA 94931
(707) 794-0400
Project: 19-189
1 INTRODUCTION
The Estuary @ Terra project site (APN 015-39-020) is an approximately 6.23-acre undeveloped lot located south of North First Street and north of Highway 237 in the Alviso area of San José.

The site is bound by the Guadalupe River to the south, State-owned open space to the east, and privately-owned parcels to the north and west. The site is within the boundaries of the Alviso Master Plan.

The project proposes construction of a 108,702 square foot, 215-room hotel in a five-story building. The northeastern corner of the site would include a surface parking lot with 43 parking spaces, and a four-story parking garage with 192 spaces, for a total of 235 parking spaces.

This report evaluates the project’s potential to result in significant noise and vibration impacts with respect to applicable California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines. The report is divided into three sections: 1) the Setting Section provides a brief description of the fundamentals of environmental noise and groundborne vibration, summarizes applicable regulatory criteria, and discusses existing noise conditions in the project vicinity; 2) the General Plan Consistency Section discusses land use compatibility utilizing policies in the City’s General Plan; and, 3) the Impacts and Mitigation Measures Section describes the significance criteria used to evaluate project impacts, provides a discussion of each project impact, and presents measures, where necessary, to mitigate the impacts of the project on sensitive receptors in the vicinity.

SETTING
Fundamentals of Environmental Noise
Noise may be defined as unwanted sound. Noise is usually objectionable because it is disturbing or annoying. The objectionable nature of sound could be caused by its pitch or its loudness. Pitch is the height or depth of a tone or sound, depending on the relative rapidity (frequency) of the vibrations by which it is produced. Higher pitched signals sound louder to humans than sounds with a lower pitch. Loudness is intensity of sound waves combined with the reception characteristics of the ear. Intensity may be compared with the height of an ocean wave in that it is a measure of the amplitude of the sound wave.

In addition to the concepts of pitch and loudness, there are several noise measurement scales which are used to describe noise in a particular location. A decibel (dB) is a unit of measurement which indicates the relative amplitude of a sound. The zero on the decibel scale is based on the lowest sound level that the healthy, unimpaired human ear can detect. Sound levels in decibels are calculated on a logarithmic basis. An increase of 10 decibels represents a ten-fold increase in acoustic energy, while 20 decibels is 100 times more intense, 30 decibels is 1,000 times more intense, etc. There is a relationship between the subjective noisiness or loudness of a sound and its intensity. Each 10 decibel increase in sound level is perceived as approximately a doubling of loudness over a fairly wide range of intensities. Technical terms are defined in Table 1. 2 There are several methods of characterizing sound. The most common in California is the Aweighted sound level (dBA). This scale gives greater weight to the frequencies of sound to which the human ear is most sensitive. Representative outdoor and indoor noise levels in units of dBA are shown in Table 2. Because sound levels can vary markedly over a short period of time, a method for describing either the average character of the sound or the statistical behavior of the variations must be utilized. Most commonly, environmental sounds are described in terms of an average level that has the same acoustical energy as the summation of all the time-varying events. This energy-equivalent sound/noise descriptor is called Leq. The most common averaging period is hourly, but Leq can describe any series of noise events of arbitrary duration.

The scientific instrument used to measure noise is the sound level meter. Sound level meters can accurately measure environmental noise levels to within about plus or minus 1 dBA. Various computer models are used to predict environmental noise levels from sources, such as roadways and airports. The accuracy of the predicted models depends upon the distance the receptor is from the noise source. Close to the noise source, the models are accurate to within about plus or minus 1 to 2 dBA.

Since the sensitivity to noise increases during the evening and at night -- because excessive noise interferes with the ability to sleep -- 24-hour descriptors have been developed that incorporate artificial noise penalties added to quiet-time noise events. The Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) is a measure of the cumulative noise exposure in a community, with a 5 dB penalty added to evening (7:00 pm - 10:00 pm) and a 10 dB addition to nocturnal (10:00 pm - 7:00 am) noise levels. The Day/Night Average Sound Level (DNL or Ldn) is essentially the same as CNEL, with the exception that the evening time period is dropped and all occurrences during this three-hour period are grouped into the daytime period.

Effects of Noise
Sleep and Speech Interference
The thresholds for speech interference indoors are about 45 dBA if the noise is steady and above 55 dBA if the noise is fluctuating. Outdoors the thresholds are about 15 dBA higher. Steady noises of sufficient intensity (above 35 dBA) and fluctuating noise levels above about 45 dBA have been shown to affect sleep. Interior residential standards for multi-family dwellings are set by the State of California at 45 dBA DNL. Typically, the highest steady traffic noise level during the daytime is about equal to the DNL and nighttime levels are 10 dBA lower. The standard is designed for sleep and speech protection and most jurisdictions apply the same criterion for all residential uses. Typical structural attenuation is 12-17 dBA with open windows. With closed windows in good condition, the noise attenuation factor is around 20 dBA for an older structure and 25 dBA for a newer dwelling. Sleep and speech interference is therefore possible when exterior noise levels are about 57-62 dBA DNL with open windows and 65-70 dBA DNL if the windows are closed. Levels of 55-60 dBA are common along collector streets and secondary arterials, while 65-70 dBA is a typical value for a primary/major arterial. Levels of 75-80 dBA are normal noise levels at the first row of development outside a freeway right-of-way. In order to achieve an acceptable interior noise environment, bedrooms facing secondary roadways need 3 to be able to have their windows closed, those facing major roadways and freeways typically need special glass windows.

Annoyance
Attitude surveys are used for measuring the annoyance felt in a community for noises intruding into homes or affecting outdoor activity areas. In these surveys, it was determined that the causes for annoyance include interference with speech, radio and television, house vibrations, and interference with sleep and rest. The DNL as a measure of noise has been found to provide a valid correlation of noise level and the percentage of people annoyed. People have been asked to judge the annoyance caused by aircraft noise and ground transportation noise. There continues to be disagreement about the relative annoyance of these different sources. When measuring the percentage of the population highly annoyed, the threshold for ground vehicle noise is about 50 dBA DNL. At a DNL of about 60 dBA, approximately 12 percent of the population is highly annoyed. When the DNL increases to 70 dBA, the percentage of the population highly annoyed increases to about 25-30 percent of the population. There is, therefore, an increase of about 2 percent per dBA between a DNL of 60-70 dBA. Between a DNL of 70-80 dBA, each decibel increase increases by about 3 percent the percentage of the population highly annoyed. People appear to respond more adversely to aircraft noise. When the DNL is 60 dBA, approximately 30- 35 percent of the population is believed to be highly annoyed. Each decibel increase to 70 dBA adds about 3 percentage points to the number of people highly annoyed. Above 70 dBA, each decibel increase results in about a 4 percent increase in the percentage of the population highly annoyed.
4 TABLE 1 Definition of Acoustical Terms Used in this Report Term Definition
Decibel, dB A unit describing, the amplitude of sound, equal to 20 times the logarithm to the base 10 of the ratio of the pressure of the sound measured to the reference pressure. The reference pressure for air is 20 micro Pascals.

Sound Pressure Level Sound pressure is the sound force per unit area, usually expressed in micro Pascals (or 20 micro Newtons per square meter), where 1 Pascal is the pressure resulting from a force of 1 Newton exerted over an area of 1 square meter. The sound pressure level is expressed in decibels as 20 times the logarithm to the base 10 of the ratio between the pressures exerted by the sound to a reference sound pressure (e. g., 20 micro Pascals). Sound pressure level is the quantity that is directly measured by a sound level meter.

Frequency, Hz The number of complete pressure fluctuations per second above and below atmospheric pressure. Normal human hearing is between 20 Hz and 20,000 Hz. Infrasonic sound are below 20 Hz and Ultrasonic sounds are above 20,000 Hz.

A-Weighted Sound
Level, dBA
The sound pressure level in decibels as measured on a sound level meter using the A-weighting filter network. The A-weighting filter deemphasizes the very low and very high frequency components of the sound in a manner similar to the frequency response of the human ear and correlates well with subjective reactions to noise.

Equivalent Noise Level,
Leq
The average A-weighted noise level during the measurement period.

Lmax, Lmin
The maximum and minimum A-weighted noise level during the measurement period.

L01, L10, L50, L90 The A-weighted noise levels that are exceeded 1%, 10%, 50%, and 90% of the time during the measurement period.

Day/Night Noise Level,
Ldn or DNL
The average A-weighted noise level during a 24-hour day, obtained after addition of 10 decibels to levels measured in the night between 10:00 pm and 7:00 am.

Community Noise
Equivalent Level,
CNEL
The average A-weighted noise level during a 24-hour day, obtained after addition of 5 decibels in the evening from 7:00 pm to 10:00 pm and after addition of 10 decibels to sound levels measured in the night between 10:00 pm and 7:00 am.

Ambient Noise Level The composite of noise from all sources near and far. The normal or existing level of environmental noise at a given location.

Intrusive That noise which intrudes over and above the existing ambient noise at a given location. The relative intrusiveness of a sound depends upon its amplitude, duration, frequency, and time of occurrence and tonal or informational content as well as the prevailing ambient noise level.

Source: Handbook of Acoustical Measurements and Noise Control, Harris, 1998.

5 TABLE 2 Typical Noise Levels in the Environment
Common Outdoor Activities Noise Level (dBA) Common Indoor Activities 110 dBA Rock band
Jet fly-over at 1,000 feet
100 dBA
Gas lawn mower at 3 feet
90 dBA
Diesel truck at 50 feet at 50 mph Food blender at 3 feet 80 dBA Garbage disposal at 3 feet
Noisy urban area, daytime
Gas lawn mower, 100 feet 70 dBA Vacuum cleaner at 10 feet Commercial area Normal speech at 3 feet
Heavy traffic at 300 feet 60 dBA
Large business office
Quiet urban daytime 50 dBA Dishwasher in next room
Quiet urban nighttime 40 dBA Theater, large conference room Quiet suburban nighttime
30 dBA Library
Quiet rural nighttime Bedroom at night, concert hall
(background)
20 dBA
Broadcast/recording studio
10 dBA
0 dBA
Source: Technical Noise Supplement (TeNS), California Department of Transportation, September 2013.

6 Fundamentals of Groundborne Vibration
Ground vibration consists of rapidly fluctuating motions or waves with an average motion of zero. Several different methods are typically used to quantify vibration amplitude. One method is the Peak Particle Velocity (PPV). The PPV is defined as the maximum instantaneous positive or negative peak of the vibration wave. In this report, a PPV descriptor with units of mm/sec or in/sec is used to evaluate construction generated vibration for building damage and human complaints. Table 3 displays the reactions of people and the effects on buildings that continuous or frequent intermittent vibration levels produce. The guidelines in Table 3 represent syntheses of vibration criteria for human response and potential damage to buildings resulting from construction vibration.

Construction activities can cause vibration that varies in intensity depending on several factors.

The use of pile driving and vibratory compaction equipment typically generates the highest construction related groundborne vibration levels. Because of the impulsive nature of such activities, the use of the PPV descriptor has been routinely used to measure and assess groundborne vibration and almost exclusively to assess the potential of vibration to cause damage and the degree of annoyance for humans.

The two primary concerns with construction-induced vibration, the potential to damage a structure and the potential to interfere with the enjoyment of life, are evaluated against different vibration limits. Human perception to vibration varies with the individual and is a function of physical setting and the type of vibration. Persons exposed to elevated ambient vibration levels, such as people in an urban environment, may tolerate a higher vibration level.

Structural damage can be classified as cosmetic only, such as paint flaking or minimal extension of cracks in building surfaces; minor, including limited surface cracking; or major, that may threaten the structural integrity of the building. Safe vibration limits that can be applied to assess the potential for damaging a structure vary by researcher. The damage criteria presented in Table 3 include several categories for ancient, fragile, and historic structures, the types of structures most at risk to damage. Most buildings are included within the categories ranging from “Historic and some old buildings” to “Modern industrial/commercial buildings”. Construction-induced vibration that can be detrimental to the building is very rare and has only been observed in instances where the structure is at a high state of disrepair and the construction activity occurs immediately adjacent to the structure.

The annoyance levels shown in Table 3 should be interpreted with care since vibration may be found to be annoying at lower levels than those shown, depending on the level of activity or the sensitivity of the individual. To sensitive individuals, vibrations approaching the threshold of perception can be annoying. Low-level vibrations frequently cause irritating secondary vibration, such as a slight rattling of windows, doors, or stacked dishes. The rattling sound can give rise to exaggerated vibration complaints, even though there is very little risk of actual structural damage.

7 TABLE 3 Reaction of People and Damage to Buildings from Continuous or Frequent Intermittent Vibration Levels
Velocity Level,
PPV (in/sec) Human Reaction Effect on Buildings

0.01 Barely perceptible No effect

0.04 Distinctly perceptible Vibration unlikely to cause damage of any type to any structure

0.08 Distinctly perceptible to
strongly perceptible
Recommended upper level of the vibration to
which ruins and ancient monuments should be
subjected

0.1 Strongly perceptible Virtually no risk of damage to normal buildings

0.25 Strongly perceptible to
severe
Threshold at which there is a risk of damage to
historic and some old buildings.

0.3 Strongly perceptible to
severe
Threshold at which there is a risk of damage to
older residential dwellings such as plastered
walls or ceilings

0.5 Severe - Vibrations
considered unpleasant
Threshold at which there is a risk of damage to
newer residential structures
Source: Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual, California Department of Transportation, September 2013.

Regulatory Background – Noise
The State of California and the City of San José have established regulatory criteria that are applicable in this assessment. The State of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Appendix G, are used to assess the potential significance of impacts pursuant to local General Plan policies, Municipal Code standards, or the applicable standards of other agencies.

A summary of the applicable regulatory criteria is provided below.

State of California
State CEQA Guidelines. CEQA contains guidelines to evaluate the significance of effects of environmental noise attributable to a proposed project. Under CEQA, noise impacts would be considered significant if the project would result in:
(a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local General Plan or Noise Ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies; (b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels; or (c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or where such a plan has not been adopted within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, if the project would expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels.
8 2019 California Building Code, Title 24, Part 2. The current version of the California Building Code (CBC) requires interior noise levels attributable to exterior environmental noise sources to be limited to a level not exceeding 45 dBA DNL/CNEL in any habitable room.

City of San José
City of San José General Plan. The Environmental Leadership Chapter in the Envision San José 2040 General Plan sets forth policies with the goal of minimizing the impact of noise on people through noise reduction and suppression techniques, and through appropriate land use policies in the City of San José. The following policies are applicable to the proposed project:

EC-1.1 Locate new development in areas where noise levels are appropriate for the proposed uses. Consider federal, state, and City noise standards and guidelines as a part of new development review. Applicable standards and guidelines for land uses in San José include:

Interior Noise Levels
 The City’s standard for interior noise levels in residences, hotels, motels, residential care facilities, and hospitals is 45 dBA DNL. Include appropriate site and building design, building construction and noise attenuation techniques in new development to meet this standard. For sites with exterior noise levels of 60 dBA DNL or more, an acoustical analysis following protocols in the City-adopted California Building Code is required to demonstrate that development projects can meet this standard. The acoustical analysis shall base required noise attenuation techniques on expected Envision General Plan traffic volumes to ensure land use compatibility and General Plan consistency over the life of this plan.

Exterior Noise Levels
 The City’s acceptable exterior noise level objective is 60 dBA DNL or less for residential and most institutional land uses (Table EC-1). The acceptable exterior noise level objective is established for the City, except in the environs of the San José International Airport and the Downtown, as described below:
o For new multi-family residential projects and for the residential component of mixed-use development, use a standard of 60 dBA DNL in usable outdoor activity areas, excluding balconies and residential stoops and porches facing existing roadways. Some common use areas that meet the 60 dBA DNL exterior standard will be available to all residents. Use noise attenuation techniques such as shielding by buildings and structures for outdoor common use areas. On sites subject to aircraft overflights or adjacent to elevated roadways, use noise attenuation techniques to achieve the 60 dBA DNL standard for noise from sources other than aircraft and elevated roadway segments. 9 EC-1.2 Minimize the noise impacts of new development on land uses sensitive to increased noise levels (Categories 1, 2, 3 and 6) by limiting noise generation and by requiring use of noise attenuation measures such as acoustical enclosures and sound barriers, where feasible. The City considers significant noise impacts to occur if a project would:
• Cause the DNL at noise sensitive receptors to increase by five dBA DNL or more where the noise levels would remain “Normally Acceptable”; or • Cause the DNL at noise sensitive receptors to increase by three dBA DNL or more where noise levels would equal or exceed the “Normally Acceptable” level.

EC-1.3 Mitigate noise generation of new nonresidential land uses to 55 dBA DNL at the property line when located adjacent to existing or planned noise-sensitive residential and public/quasi-public land uses.

EC-1.6 Regulate the effects of operational noise from existing and new industrial and commercial development on adjacent uses through noise standards in the City’s Municipal Code.

EC-1.7 Require construction operations within San José to use best available noise suppression devices and techniques and limit construction hours near residential uses per the City’s Municipal Code. The City considers significant construction noise impacts to occur if a project located within 500 feet of residential uses or 200 feet of commercial or office uses would:
 Involve substantial noise generating activities (such as building demolition, grading, excavation, pile driving, use of impact equipment, or building framing) continuing for more than 12 months.

For such large or complex projects, a construction noise logistics plan that specifies hours of construction, noise and vibration minimization measures, posting or notification of construction schedules, and designation of a noise disturbance coordinator who would respond to neighborhood complaints will be required to be in place prior to the start of construction and implemented during construction to reduce noise impacts on neighboring residents and other uses. 10 Santa Clara County
Santa Clara County Airport Land Use Commission Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The Comprehensive Land Use Plan adopted by the Santa Clara County Airport Land Use Commission contains standards for projects within the vicinity of San José International Airport, which are relevant to this project:

Policy N-3 Noise impacts shall be evaluated according to the Aircraft Noise Contours presented on Figure 5 (2022 Aircraft Noise Contours).

Policy N-4 No residential or transient lodging construction shall be permitted within the 65 dB CNEL contour boundary unless it can be demonstrated that the resulting interior sound levels will be less than 45 dB CNEL and there are no outdoor patios or outdoor activity areas associated with the residential portion of a mixed use residential project or a multi-unit residential project. (Sound wall noise mitigation measures are not effective in reducing noise generated by aircraft flying overhead.)
11 Regulatory Background – Vibration
City of San José
City of San José General Plan. The Environmental Leadership Chapter in the Envision San José 2040 General Plan sets forth policies to achieve the goal of minimizing vibration impacts on people, residences, and business operations in the City of San José. The following policies are applicable to the proposed project:

EC-2.3 Require new development to minimize continuous vibration impacts to adjacent uses during demolition and construction. For sensitive historic structures, including ruins and ancient monuments or building that are documented to be structurally weakened, a continuous vibration limit of 0.08 in/sec PPV (peak particle velocity) will be used to minimize the potential for cosmetic damage to a building. A continuous vibration limit of 0.20 in/sec PPV will be used to minimize the potential for cosmetic damage at buildings of normal conventional construction. Equipment or activities typical of generating continuous vibration include but are not limited to: excavation equipment; static compaction equipment; vibratory pile drivers; pile-extraction equipment; and vibratory compaction equipment. Avoid use of impact pile drivers within 125 feet of any buildings, and within 300 feet of historical buildings, or buildings in poor condition. On a project-specific basis, this distance of 300 feet may be reduced where warranted by a technical study by a qualified professional that verifies that there will be virtually no risk of cosmetic damage to sensitive buildings from the new development during demolition and construction. Transient vibration impacts may exceed a vibration limit of 0.08 in/sec PPV only when and where warranted by a technical study by a qualified professional that verifies that there will be virtually no risk of cosmetic damage to sensitive buildings from the new development during demolition and construction.

Existing Noise Environment
Figure 1 is an aerial image of the site vicinity overlaid with the project site plan. Existing noisesensitive receptors in the project vicinity include Mayne Elementary School, the Alviso Branch Library, single-family residences north of North First Street, and the Summerset Mobile Estates west of the Guadalupe River.

Due to Shelter-in-Place restrictions implemented by the State of California1 at the time of this
study, traffic volumes along the surrounding roadways were lower. A noise monitoring survey was not completed to document ambient noise levels during this time period because resultant noise levels would not be representative of typical conditions.

In order to establish the environmental baseline for the project, noise data contained in the City of San José General Plan were reviewed along with noise data from a nearby project. A review of these data indicates that the noise environment in the project vicinity is primarily the result of 1Cal. Exec. Order No. N-33-20, March 19, 2020.
12 vehicular traffic along Highway 237 and North First Street. In 2008, Highway 237 produced a noise level of approximately 82 dBA DNL at 75 feet from the near direction of travel.2 The
General Plan noise contour information shows that noise levels at boundaries of the project site nearest to Highway 237 are approximately 65 dBA DNL, as shown in Figure 2. Noise levels along Highway 237 are not projected to measurably increase by 2035.

Noise data quantified by Bollard Acoustical Consultants for the Topgolf @ Terra Project3 in 2015 indicate that ambient noise levels ranged from 65 to 66 dBA DNL at Location A, which is representative of the noise environment at the nearest residences on North First Street, and from 62 to 64 dBA DNL at Location B, which is representative of residences west of the Guadalupe River.
2 Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc., “Envision San Jose 2040 General Plan Comprehensive Update Environmental Noise Assessment,” December 2010.
3 City of San Jose, Initial Study Topgolf @ Terra Project, Table 4.12-1, September 2016. 12 FIGURE 1 Project Vicinity and Site Plan Source: Google Earth, 2020. 13 FIGURE 2 Project Site in Relation to General Plan Noise Contours Source: Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc., “Envision San José 2040 General Plan Comprehensive Update Environmental Noise Assessment,” December 2010.

Project
Site
14 GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS
Noise and Land Use Compatibility
Future Exterior Noise Environment
The exterior noise threshold established in the City’s General Plan for new hotel projects is 60 dBA DNL at usable outdoor activity areas, excluding private balconies and porches. The project site plan identifies a small amenity deck south of the hotel lobby that would be exposed to future exterior noise levels of approximately 65 dBA DNL. Exterior noise levels at the amenity deck would exceed the City’s 60 dBA DNL threshold at the center of the outdoor use area by up to 5 dBA DNL and would be considered to be “conditionally acceptable” with respect to the noise environment. Due to the limited size and open nature of this amenity deck, the City could allow the outdoor use area without additional measures to reduce noise levels because future exterior noise levels would fall within the conditionally acceptable noise level range for hotels. However, if the City does not allow the amenity deck in a conditionally acceptable noise environment, noise control measures would be required to meet the City’s normally acceptable threshold of 60 dBA DNL.

Measures to Reduce Exterior Noise Levels
Methods available to reduce exterior noise levels at the amenity deck include site planning alternatives (e.g., using the proposed buildings as noise barriers), the construction of traditional noise barriers, or a combination of the above. A minimum 5-foot high noise barrier, as measured from the base elevation of the deck, could be constructed along the southern perimeter of the amenity deck to reduce noise levels by 5 dBA. The noise barrier should be solid from grade to top, with no cracks or gaps, in order to be effective. Barrier materials should have a minimum surface density of three lbs./ft.2
, and a clear barrier would be optimal in order to maintain aesthetic appeal (i.e., ½-inch laminated glass). With the implementation of this barrier, the exterior noise environment at the amenity deck would be maintained at or below 60 dBA DNL.

Future Interior Noise Environment

The City of San José requires that interior noise levels within hotels be maintained at 45 dBA DNL or less. Interior noise levels would vary depending upon the design of the buildings (relative window area to wall area) and the selected construction materials and methods.

Standard hotel construction methods provide approximately 25 dBA of exterior-to-interior noise reduction assuming windows are closed. In noise environments ranging from 65 to 70 dBA DNL, interior noise levels can typically be maintained below 45 dBA DNL with the incorporation of an adequate forced-air mechanical ventilation system in each hotel room, allowing the windows to be closed to control noise. In noise environments exceeding 70 dBA DNL, a combination of forced-air mechanical ventilation and sound-rated construction methods is often necessary to meet the interior noise level limit.

The southern façade of the proposed hotel building would receive the highest traffic noise exposure. At 830 feet from the center of Highway 237, the southern-facing hotel rooms would be exposed to future exterior noise levels up to 65 dBA DNL. Rooms located along the northern, 15 eastern, and western building façades would be exposed to lower traffic noise levels due to acoustical shielding provided by the hotel building itself and setback of the building from North First Street. In addition to the traffic noise exposure, the northern and western building façades would be exposed to operational noise associated with the Topgolf project. Figure 3 displays the noise levels expected from the Topgolf project at the proposed hotel building. Based on these data, Topgolf noise levels would reach 60 dBA Leq at the hotel building, and the worst-case DNL noise level, estimated assuming this worst-case noise level during operational hours (9:00 am to 2:00 am), would reach 63 dBA. Based on the future exterior noise exposure anticipated at the site, interior noise levels attributable to exterior environmental noise sources would exceed 45 dBA DNL assuming windows are open for ventilation.

Measures to Reduce Future Interior Noise Levels
The following noise insulation features should be incorporated into the proposed project:
 Provide a suitable form of forced-air mechanical ventilation, as determined by the local building official, for all hotel rooms, so that windows can be kept closed to control noise.

The implementation of these noise insulation features would reduce interior noise levels to 45 dBA DNL or less in the hotel rooms.
16 FIGURE 3 Topgolf Project Noise Levels at Project Site Source: Google Earth, 2020 and City of San José, Initial Study Topgolf @ Terra Project, Figure 4.12-2, September 2016. 17 NOISE IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
Significance Criteria
The following criteria were used to evaluate the significance of noise or vibration resulting from the project:
 A significant noise impact would be identified if the project would generate a substantial temporary or permanent noise level increase over ambient noise levels at existing noisesensitive receptors surrounding the project site. o A significant noise impact would be identified if construction-related noise would temporarily increase ambient noise levels at sensitive receptors. The City of San José considers large or complex projects involving substantial noise-generating activities and lasting more than 12 months significant when within 500 feet of residential land uses or within 200 feet of commercial land uses or offices. o A significant permanent noise level increase would occur if project-generated traffic would result in: a) a noise level increase of 5 dBA DNL or greater, with a future noise level of less than 60 dBA DNL, or b) a noise level increase of 3 dBA DNL or greater, with a future noise level of 60 dBA DNL or greater. o A significant noise impact would be identified if the project would expose persons to or generate noise levels that would exceed applicable noise standards presented in the General Plan.
 A significant impact would be identified if the construction of the project would generate excessive vibration levels surrounding receptors. Groundborne vibration levels exceeding

0.2 in/sec PPV would have the potential to result in cosmetic damage to normal buildings.
 A significant noise impact would be identified if the project would expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive aircraft noise levels.

Impact 1a: Construction Noise. The construction of the project would temporarily increase ambient noise levels in the project vicinity, but construction activities would occur at distances greater than 500 feet from the nearest residential uses and more than 200 feet from the nearest commercial or office uses. This is a less-thansignificant impact.

Policy EC-1.7 of the City’s General Plan requires that all construction operations within the City to use best available noise suppression devices and techniques and to limit construction hours near residential uses per the Municipal Code allowable hours, which are between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday when construction occurs within 500 feet of a residential land use. Further, the City considers significant construction noise impacts to occur if a project located within 500 feet of residential uses or 200 feet of commercial or office uses 18 would involve substantial noise-generating activities (such as building demolition, grading, excavation, pile driving, use of impact equipment, or building framing) continuing for more than 12 months.

Construction activities generate considerable amounts of noise, especially during earth-moving activities when heavy equipment is used. The construction of the proposed project would involve grading, excavation to lay foundations, trenching, building erection, and paving. The hauling of imported and exported soil and materials would generate truck trips on local roadways as well.

Grading of the site would import approximately 900 cubic yards of fill. Construction activities would last approximately eighteen months, beginning in spring of 2021.

During each stage of construction, there would be a different mix of equipment operating, and noise levels would vary by stage and vary within stages, based on the amount of equipment in operation and the location at which the equipment is operating. Typical construction noise levels at 50 feet are shown in Tables 4 and 5. Table 4 shows the average noise level ranges, by construction phase, and Table 5 shows the maximum noise level ranges for different construction equipment. Most construction noise falls with the range of 80 to 90 dBA at 50 feet from the source.

TABLE 4 Typical Ranges of Construction Noise Levels at 50 Feet, Leq (dBA) Domestic
Housing
Office Building,
Hotel, Hospital,
School, Public
Works
Industrial
Parking Garage,
Religious
Amusement &
Recreations,
Store, Service
Station
Public Works
Roads &
Highways,
Sewers, and
Trenches

I II I II I II I II
Ground
Clearing 83 83 84 84 84 83 84 84
Excavation 88 75 89 79 89 71 88 78
Foundations 81 81 78 78 77 77 88 88
Erection 81 65 87 75 84 72 79 78
Finishing 88 72 89 75 89 74 84 84
I - All pertinent equipment present at site.

II - Minimum required equipment present at site.

Source: U.S.E.P.A., Legal Compilation on Noise, Vol. 1, p. 2-104, 1973.

19 TABLE 5 Construction Equipment 50-foot Noise Emission Limits Equipment Category Lmax Level (dBA)1,2 Impact/Continuous Arc Welder
Auger Drill Rig
Backhoe
Bar Bender
Boring Jack Power Unit
Chain Saw
Compressor3
Compressor (other)
Concrete Mixer
Concrete Pump
Concrete Saw
Concrete Vibrator
Crane
Dozer
Excavator
Front End Loader
Generator
Generator (25 KVA or less)
Gradall
Grader
Grinder Saw
Horizontal Boring Hydro Jack
Hydra Break Ram
Impact Pile Driver
Insitu Soil Sampling Rig
Jackhammer
Mounted Impact Hammer (hoe ram)
Paver
Pneumatic Tools
Pumps
Rock Drill
Scraper
Slurry Trenching Machine
Soil Mix Drill Rig
Street Sweeper
Tractor
Truck (dump, delivery)
Vacuum Excavator Truck (vac-truck)
Vibratory Compactor
Vibratory Pile Driver
All other equipment with engines larger than 5 HP
73 85
80 80
80 85
70 80
85 82
90 80
85 85
85 80
82 70
85 85
85 80
90 105
84 85
90 85
85 77
85 85
82 80
80 84
84 85
80 95
85 Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Impact
Impact
Continuous
Impact
Impact
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Continuous
Notes:
1 Measured at 50 feet from the construction equipment, with a “slow” (1 sec.) time constant. 2 Noise limits apply to total noise emitted from equipment and associated components operating at full power while engaged in its intended operation.
3 Portable Air Compressor rated at 75 cfm or greater and that operates at greater than 50 psi.

Source: Mitigation of Nighttime Construction Noise, Vibrations and Other Nuisances, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, 1999.

20 As shown in Table 4, construction noise levels produced by the project would typically range from 78 to 89 dBA Leq at a distance of 50 feet from the source with all pertinent equipment present at the site. With the minimum required equipment present at the site, construction noise levels produced by the project would typically range from 75 to 84 dBA Leq at a distance of 50 feet from the source. Construction-generated noise levels drop off at a rate of about 6 dBA per doubling of the distance between the source and receptor. Shielding by buildings or terrain can provide an additional 5 to 10 dBA noise reduction at distant receptors.

The nearest noise-sensitive educational and residential land uses would be located approximately 900 feet from the acoustic center of the construction site. Construction noise levels at 900 feet would range from 53 to 64 dBA Leq with all pertinent equipment present at the site and from 50 to 59 dBA Leq with the minimum required equipment present at the site. Construction noise levels would generally be within the range of typical daytime noise levels (58 to 63 dBA Leq) 4 experienced at the nearest noise-sensitive educational and residential land uses. The nearest commercial or office uses would be located approximately 600 feet from the acoustic center of the construction site. Construction noise levels at 600 feet would range from 57 to 68 dBA Leq with all pertinent equipment present at the site and from 54 to 63 dBA Leq with the minimum required equipment present at the site.

Per General Plan Policy EC-1.7, temporary noise increases due to project construction would be considered less-than-significant as the as the construction activity would occur more than 500 feet from the nearest sensitive residential uses and more than 200 feet from the nearest commercial or office uses.

Mitigation Measure 1a: None required.

Impact 1b: Permanent Noise Level Increase. The proposed project would not result in a permanent noise level increase at existing noise-sensitive land uses in the project vicinity due to project-generated traffic. This is a less-than-significant impact.

A significant impact would result if traffic generated by the project would substantially increase noise levels at sensitive receptors in the vicinity. A substantial increase would occur if: a) the noise level increase is 5 dBA DNL or greater, with a future noise level of less than 60 dBA DNL, or b) the noise level increase is 3 dBA DNL or greater, with a future noise level of 60 dBA DNL or greater. The existing noise environment in the surrounding area would exceed 60 dBA DNL; therefore, a significant impact would occur if project-generated traffic would permanently increase noise levels by 3 dBA DNL. For reference, a 3 dBA DNL noise increase would be expected if the project would double existing traffic volumes along a roadway.

For the proposed project, peak hour turning movements were provided for seven study intersections. Existing plus project traffic volumes were compared to existing volumes to estimate the project’s contribution to permanent noise level increases expected in the project vicinity. Upon comparison of these traffic conditions, traffic noise increases of less than 1 dBA DNL were estimated for the roadways serving the site. Traffic noise increases are summarized in 4 City of San Jose, Initial Study Topgolf @ Terra Project, Table 4.12-1, September 2016. 21 Table 6, below. The project would neither result in a doubling of traffic volumes nor result in a permanent noise increase of 3 dBA DNL or more. This is a less-than-significant impact.

TABLE 6 Traffic Noise Increase Summary
Roadway Segment Existing
PM Peak
Hour Volume
Existing Plus
Project PM
Peak Hour
Volume
Relative
Noise Level
Increase,
dBA DNL
North First Street
North of Trinity Pak Drive 543 577 0
Trinity Park Drive to Bay
Vista Drive 633 716 <1
Bay Vista Drive to Nortech
Parkway 633 716 <1
South of Nortech Parkway 933 1016 0
Trinity Park Drive East of North First Street 31 31 0
Nortech Parkway East of North First Street 358 358 0
Source: Fehr & Peers, July 2020 and Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc., September 2020.

Mitigation Measure 1b: None required.

Impact 1c: Noise Levels in Excess of Standards. The proposed project would not generate noise in excess of standards established in the City’s General Plan at the nearby sensitive receptors. This is a less-than-significant noise impact.

On site noise sources, including mechanical equipment for heating, ventilation, and cooling purposes, exhaust fans and other similar equipment, parking lots, truck deliveries, etc., would not occur in areas near noise-sensitive receptors. No noise-generating sources are anticipated for this project that would exceed the applicable noise limits over 600 feet from the project site. Such noise sources would produce noise levels well below ambient noise levels in the area resulting from vehicle traffic, aircraft, and other commercial and industrial operations. This is a less-thansignificant impact.

Mitigation Measure 1c: None required.

Impact 2: Exposure to Excessive Groundborne Vibration. The project site is located over 200 feet from existing or proposed buildings near the project site. At this minimum distance, construction-related vibration levels would not exceed the City’s thresholds for vibration levels received at historic buildings or buildings of normal conventional construction. This is a less-than-significant impact.

Construction phases proposed by the project include site preparation, grading/excavation, trenching/ foundation, and new building framing and finishing. Project construction activities would not include pile driving or other substantial sources of vibration.

According to Policy EC-2.3 of the City of San José General Plan, a vibration limit of 0.08 in/sec PPV shall be used to minimize the potential for cosmetic damage to sensitive historical 22 structures, and a vibration limit of 0.20 in/sec PPV shall be used to minimize damage at buildings of normal conventional construction.

Vibration levels would vary depending on soil conditions, construction methods, and equipment used. Table 7 presents typical vibration levels that could be expected from construction equipment at a distance of 25 feet. Jackhammers typically generate vibration levels of 0.035 in/sec PPV, and drilling typically generates vibration levels of 0.09 in/sec PPV at a distance of 25 feet. Table 7 also summarizes the distances to the 0.08 in/sec PPV threshold for historic buildings and to the 0.2 in/sec PPV threshold for all other buildings of normal conventional construction.

TABLE 7 Vibration Source Levels for Construction Equipment Equipment PPV at
25 ft.
(in/sec)
Minimum Distance to
Meet 0.08 in/sec PPV
(feet)
Minimum Distance to
Meet 0.2 in/sec PPV
(feet)
Clam shovel drop 0.202 58 26
Hydromill (slurry
wall)
in soil 0.008 3 1
in rock 0.017 6 2
Vibratory Roller 0.210 60 27
Hoe Ram 0.089 28 12
Large bulldozer 0.089 28 12
Caisson drilling 0.089 28 12
Loaded trucks 0.076 24 10
Jackhammer 0.035 12 5
Small bulldozer 0.003 1 <1
Source: Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, Federal Transit Administration, Office of Planning and Environment, U.S. Department of Transportation, FTA Report No. 0123, September 2018, as modified by Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc., September 2020.

Construction vibration may at times be perceptible at the common property lines of the project site but would minimal and dissipate rapidly with distance from the construction activity occurring at the time. Since the project site is located over 200 feet from buildings nearest the project site, no vibration-related impacts are identified at any of the nearest sensitive receptors to the project site. This is a less-than-significant impact.

Mitigation Measure 2: None Required.

Impact 3: Excessive Aircraft Noise. The project site is located approximately 3.5 miles from the nearest airport, and the proposed project would not expose people residing or working at the site to excessive aircraft noise. This is a less-thansignificant impact.

Norman Y. Mineta San José International Airport is a public-use airport located approximately

3.5 miles south-southeast of the project site. Figure 4 shows that the project site lies well outside the 2037 60 dBA CNEL noise contour of the airport, according to the City’s new Airport Master 23 Plan Environmental Impact Report.
5 This means that future exterior noise levels due to aircraft would not exceed 60 dBA CNEL/DNL. According to Policy EC-1.11 of the City’s General Plan, the required safe and compatible threshold for exterior noise levels would be at or below 65 dBA CNEL/DNL for aircraft. Similarly, Moffett Federal Airfield is located approximately 4 miles west of the project site, and this airport produces considerably less environmental noise, as compared to Norman Y. Mineta San José International Airport. Noise levels produced by Moffett Federal Airfield aircraft are insignificant at the site and would be clearly compatible with the proposed land use. This is a less-than-significant impact.

Mitigation Measure 3: None required.
5 David J. Powers & Associates, Inc., Integrated Final Environmental Impact Report, Amendment to Norman Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport Master Plan, April 2020. 24 FIGURE 4 2037 CNEL Noise Contours for SJIA Relative to Project Site

60 CNEL
60 CNEL
Project
Site
25 Appendix A
Qualifications of Technical Expert
26 429 East Cotati Avenue
Cotati, California 94931
Tel: 707-794-0400 Fax: 707-794-0405
www.illingworthrodkin.com [email protected]
MICHAEL S. THILL
Mr. Thill is a principal of the firm with 22 years of professional experience in the field of acoustics. His expertise includes performing field research, analyzing data, and noise modeling. He has conducted numerous field surveys in a variety of acoustical environments to quantify airborne noise levels, groundborne vibration levels, and hydro-acoustic noise levels. He has analyzed and summarized complex sets of data for inclusion into noise models. Mr. Thill has been trained, and is a regular user of FHWA’s Traffic Noise Model (TNM), and is familiar with federal and State procedures for preparing highway noise study reports.

Mr. Thill has authored technical noise reports for various land use proposals including residential, commercial, educational, and industrial developments. He has managed the General Plan Update noise studies for several communities in California and has recommended policy language in order to maintain compatible noise levels community-wide. Some of his recent major projects have included the assessment of noise and vibration from data center projects, quarry expansion projects, groundwater recharge projects, and winery projects where operations and special events have been of concern in rural settings. He has vast experience explaining acoustical concepts and the results of his analyses in public forums to the general public and project decisionmakers.

Mr. Thill has also led traffic noise investigations for major transportation projects including the Route 4 Bypass project (2003 to 2013) and the I-680/Route 4 Interchange project (2014 to 2015) in Contra Costa County, California. He managed the noise study reports the US Highway 101 and State Route 85 Express Lanes projects for the Santa Clara County Valley Transit Authority (2011 to 2013), proposed along 66 miles, combined, of project study area between Mountain View and Morgan Hill, California. In 2013, Mr. Thill led the analyses of noise impacts due to the Jennings Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Rail Crossing Project, and in 2015, Mr. Thill led the analysis of noise impacts and noise abatement for the US Highway 101 / Hearn Avenue Interchange Project in Santa Rosa, California.

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
2009 - Present Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc.

Principal Petaluma, California
2005 - 2009 Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc.

Senior Consultant Petaluma, California

1998 - 2005 Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc.

Staff Consultant Petaluma, California

EDUCATION
1998 University of California at Santa Barbara
B.S., Major: Environmental Science

PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES
Institute of Noise Control Engineering
Association of Environmental Professionals
Alviso Hotel
Transportation
Analysis Report
Prepared for:

David J. Powers & Associates, Inc.

August 2021
SJ20-1997

Table of Contents

1. Introduction............................................................................................................................... 1

1.1 Project Description...............................................................................................................................................................1

1.2 Transportation Analysis Scope ........................................................................................................................................1

1.2.1 CEQA Transportation Analysis Scope ...............................................................................................................2

1.2.2 Local Transportation Analysis Scope.................................................................................................................2

1.3 Report Organization............................................................................................................................................................2

2. Existing Transportation Conditions ........................................................................................ 3

2.1 VMT............................................................................................................................................................................................3

2.2 Roadway Facilities.................................................................................................................................................................6

2.2.1 Roadway Descriptions.............................................................................................................................................6

2.3 Transit Facilities .....................................................................................................................................................................7

2.4 Bicycle Facilities .....................................................................................................................................................................8

2.5 Pedestrian Facilities............................................................................................................................................................10

3. CEQA Transportation Analysis ............................................................................................... 14

3.1 CEQA Screening Criteria...................................................................................................................................................14

3.1.1 Local-Serving Retail Trip Generation Equivalent........................................................................................14

3.2 CEQA Cumulative Analysis ..............................................................................................................................................15

4. Local Transportation Analysis................................................................................................ 17

4.1 Study Intersections.............................................................................................................................................................17

4.2 Analysis Scenarios...............................................................................................................................................................17

4.3 Analysis Methods................................................................................................................................................................18

4.3.1 Signalized Intersection Operations..................................................................................................................18

4.3.2 Unsignalized Intersection Operations.............................................................................................................19

4.4 Adverse Effect Criteria.......................................................................................................................................................20

4.4.1 City of San José Criteria........................................................................................................................................21

4.5 Project Trips ..........................................................................................................................................................................21

4.5.1 Trip Generation Estimates ...................................................................................................................................22

4.5.2 Trip Distribution and Assignment ....................................................................................................................22

4.6 Intersection Operations Analysis ..................................................................................................................................26

4.6.1 Existing Conditions.................................................................................................................................................26

4.6.2 Background Conditions........................................................................................................................................27

4.6.3 Background Intersection Adverse Effects & Improvement Measures ...............................................28

4.6.4 Peak Hour Signal Warrant Analysis..................................................................................................................28

4.6.5 Left Turn Storage Analysis...................................................................................................................................28

4.7 Site Circulation and Access .............................................................................................................................................33

4.7.1 Vehicle Access ..........................................................................................................................................................33

4.7.2 Internal Vehicle Circulation.................................................................................................................................33

4.7.3 Bicycle Access ...........................................................................................................................................................34

4.7.4 Pedestrian Access ...................................................................................................................................................34

4.7.5 Emergency Access ..................................................................................................................................................35

4.8 Parking ....................................................................................................................................................................................35

4.8.1 Vehicle Parking ........................................................................................................................................................35

4.8.2 Bicycle Parking .........................................................................................................................................................36

5. Conclusions.............................................................................................................................. 38 Appendices
Appendix A: Transportation Counts
Appendix B: Approved Trip Inventory
Appendix C: San José VMT Evaluation Tool
Appendix D: Intersection Operations Analysis Output Sheets Appendix E: Signal Warrants
Appendix F: Detailed Site Plan Sheets
Appendix G: Fire Access Plan
List of Figures
Figure 1: Project Site Vicinity and Study Intersection Locations ......................................................................................1 Figure 2: Conceptual Project Site Plan........................................................................................................................................2 Figure 3: VMT Heat Map ..................................................................................................................................................................4 Figure 4: Similar Local Land Uses..................................................................................................................................................5 Figure 5: Existing Transit................................................................................................................................................................12 Figure 6: Existing Bicycle Facilities.............................................................................................................................................13 Figure 7: Project Trip Distribution..............................................................................................................................................24 Figure 8: Project Trip Assignment..............................................................................................................................................25 Figure 9: Existing Peak Hour Intersection Traffic Volumes, Lane Configurations, and Traffic Controls......... 30 Figure 10: Background Peak Hour Intersection Traffic Volumes, Lane Configurations, and Traffic Controls .........................................................................................................................................................................................31 Figure 11: Background Plus Project Peak Hour Intersection Traffic Volumes, Lane Configurations, and Traffic Controls ..........................................................................................................................................................32 Figure 12: Perpendicular Parking Layout to Avoid...............................................................................................................34 List of Tables
Table 1: Transit Route Schedules ..................................................................................................................................................7 Table 2: Equivalent Retail Site Estimates.................................................................................................................................15 Table 3: Envision San José 2040 General Plan Land Use and Transportation Policies.......................................... 16 Table 4: Signalized Intersection Level of Service Definitions.......................................................................................... 19 Table 5: Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Definitions..................................................................................... 20 Table 6: Alviso Hotel Trip Generation Estimates.................................................................................................................. 22 Table 7: Existing Conditions Intersection Operations........................................................................................................ 26 Table 8: Background Conditions Intersection Operations............................................................................................... 27 Table 9: Left-Turn Vehicle Queue Analysis.............................................................................................................................29 Table 10: Project Parking Supply Surplus/Deficit................................................................................................................ 36 Alviso Hotel Transportation Analysis Report
August 10, 2021
1 1. Introduction
This report presents the results of a transportation analysis (TA) conducted for the proposed hotel development located in the Alviso area of San José, California. The purpose of the TA is to evaluate the proposed Project’s potential transportation adverse effects for both California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and City requirements per Council Policy 5-1 and consistent with guidelines from the City of San José’s Transportation Analysis Handbook (2018).

1.1 Project Description
The site is located at 4701 North First Street on an approximately 6.23-acre undeveloped lot, north of State Route (SR) 237 in San José, as shown in Figure 1. The site is bound by the Guadalupe River to the south, State-owned open space to the east, and privately-owned parcels to the north and west. The site is within the boundaries of the Alviso Master Plan.

The Project proposes construction of a 215-room hotel in a five-story building. In addition to sleeping accommodations the hotel includes supporting facilities such as a gym, and 3,000 SF restaurant, bar and lounge. The northeastern corner of the site would include a surface parking lot with 27 spaces, and a fourstory parking garage with 209 spaces, for a total of 236 parking spaces. Access to the site would be provided via Top Golf Drive; a future 26-foot wide roadway on the northwestern boundary of the Project site. Top Golf Drive would connect with Anderson Alley and Bay Vista Drive from the adjacent approved Top Golf development, both exiting onto North First Street as two new planned intersections. Both the approved Top Golf development and the Project would be accessed via these intersections, which have been identified as intersections to be studied in the analysis. Anderson Alley would form a new fourth leg of the existing North First Street and Trinity Park Drive intersection. This connection is proposed as part of the Top Golf Development, which is also conditioned to install a traffic signal at the intersection. The second driveway to provide access to the Project site will be at the planned Bay Vista Drive’s intersection with North First Street.

A detailed site plan is shown in Figure 2.

1.2 Transportation Analysis Scope
The scope of work for this transportation analysis was prepared consistent with City of San José Transportation Analysis Policy (Council Policy 5-1). The City of San José developed a Transportation Analysis Handbook to implement Council Policy 5-1 and provide guidance on the need, scope, and content of transportation analysis. Council Policy 5-1 addresses transportation analysis requirements consistent with CEQA and City’s development application purposes.

Alviso Hotel Transportation Analysis Report
August 10, 2021
2 1.2.1 CEQA Transportation Analysis Scope
The CEQA scope was prepared for CEQA clearance purposes and to meet Council Policy 5-1, which adopts vehicle miles traveled (VMT) as the primary metric for transportation studies under CEQA. Consistent with Council Policy 5-1, the City outlines several CEQA Transportation Performance Metrics including:
• Total VMT
• VMT per capita (residential projects)
• VMT per employee (office or industrial projects)
• Net change in total VMT (retail, hotel, or school projects) Council Policy 5-1 includes guidance for screening retail projects, including hotels, for which a detailed CEQA analysis would not be required.

1.2.2 Local Transportation Analysis Scope
Given the adoption of Senate Bill (SB) 743 and Council Policy 5-1, the analysis for the LTA is conducted for the City’s development application process and not CEQA purposes. Council Policy 5-1 requires projects to perform a LTA to demonstrate conformance with multimodal transportation strategies, goals and policies in the General Plan, and address adverse effects to the transportation system. The LTA evaluates the effects of a development project on transportation, access, circulation, and related safety elements in the proximate area of the Project. An LTA also establishes consistency with the General Plan policies and goals through the following three objectives:

1. Ensures that a local transportation system is appropriate for serving the types, characters, and intensity of the surrounding land uses;

2. Encourages projects to reduce personal motorized vehicle-trips and increase alternative transportation mode share;

3. Addresses issues related to operations and safety for all transportation modes.

The study area and study intersections are presented on Figure 1. The LTA includes a discussion of the amount of traffic generated by the Project, a description and an evaluation of pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities and services near the site with a focus on site access and connections.

1.3 Report Organization
The following chapters are included in this report for evaluating transportation effects of the Project:

Chapter 1. Introduction includes the study purpose, the Project description, and an overview of the report.

Alviso Hotel Transportation Analysis Report
August 10, 2021
3 Chapter 2. Existing Conditions provides descriptions of the transportation system near the site including the roadways, transit service, pedestrian facilities, and bicycle facilities.

Chapter 3. CEQA Transportation Analysis describes the process used to evaluate the existing and Project VMT, presents the results of the VMT analysis, and discusses the Project’s consistency with Envision San José 2040 General Plan.

Chapter 4. Local Transportation Analysis presents the Project effects on the transportation system to meet City analysis requirements. It describes the process used to estimate the amount of Project-generated traffic generated and the assignment of Project-generated trips to the transportation system. This chapter also assesses the site plan regarding access for all modes, evaluates vehicle queuing at site access points, and compares the proposed parking supply to City code requirements.

Chapter 5. Conclusions summarizes the transportation analysis results.

Don
Edwards
NWR
Sunnyvale
Baylands Park

SUNNYVALE

SAN JOSE

:(7/$1'
7<3

5(01$176/28*+
723*2/)'5,9(
$1'(5621$//(<
%$<9,67$'5,9(

LANDS OF

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
APN: 015-39-014
VACANT

LANDS OF

SANTA CLARA VALLEY

WATER DISTRICT
APN: 015-39-019

LANDS OF

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
APN: 015-39-026

LANDS OF CITY OF SAN JOSE
APN: 015-43-002

ALVISO BRANCH LIBRARY

AND COMMUNITY CENTER

LANDS OF
237 NORTH FIRST ST HOLDINGS LLC
APN: 015-39-056
VACANT

LANDS OF

CITY OF SANTA CLARA
APN: 015-39-024

EXISTING

RESIDENTIAL

LANDS OF

SANTA CLARA VALLEY

WATER DISTRICT
APN: 015-39-029

FUTURE HOTEL
PDA16-034-02
6725<
3$5.,1**$5$*(
6)

63$&(6

5,3$5,$16(7%$&.

CONTEXTUAL

SITE PLAN

3523(57</,1(
3523(57</,1(
(;,67,1*

($6(0(17
5,*+72):$<
352-(&7%281'$5<
/(*(1'
,1&+ )((7

'5$:1%<

352-(&712

&$'':*),/(

&+(&.('%<

'(6,*1('%<

'$7(

6&$/(

HMHC
NO DATE DESCRIPTION PD19-031 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT HOTEL ALVISO @ TERRA 6 ?352-(&76??3/?3(50,7?&63':*
&63'

3.0
5 2&72%(5

2DNODQG5RDG

6DQ-RVH&$
+0+FDFRP
5 5(( ,1 *1( / 1$
52)(66,2
3 '(5(76, *(5
&$/ , )251 , $
2) (7$76
&,9, /
1R
717'(9(/230(
6(59,&(6

&25%H/DUFKLWHFWV
:LOVKLUH%OYG
6XLWH
/RV$QJHOHV
&$

ZZZFRUEHODUFKLWHFWVFRP
7(55$9(1785(
Conceptual Project Site Plan
Figure 2
SJ20-1997_2_SitePlan
Site Plan Source: HMH Engineers, Oct. 29, 2020
Alviso Hotel Transportation Analysis Report
August 10, 2021
3 2. Existing Transportation
Conditions
This chapter describes the existing transportation system near the site including VMT, roadways, transit service, bicycle facilities, and pedestrian facilities.

2.1 VMT
A VMT Heat Map showing existing employment area VMT in the Project Study Area is shown on Figure 3.

As described in detail in Chapter 3 of this report, the Project has been deemed to meet the City’s screening criteria for a VMT analysis exemption based on its shared characteristics with a local-serving retail land use.

Los Altos
Newark
Mountain View
Sunnyvale
Palo Alto
East
Palo
Alto
Fremont
Los Altos
Hills
San Jose Milpitas
Santa Clara

ALAMEDA

COUNTY SAN MATEO
COUNTY

SANTA CLARA
COUNTY
3101
Moett Blvd
El Camino Real
E Tasman Dr
W Tasman Dr
Oakland Rd
Warm Springs Blvd
Coleman Ave
N Capitol Ave
Zanker Rd
Lick Mill Blvd
Cushing Pkwy
Scott Blvd
Benton St
Orchard Pkwy
Alma St
California St
E El Camino Real
Cropley Ave
Fremont Blvd
N Jackson Ave
E Bayshore Rd
San Antonio Rd
N Mathilda Ave
N 4th St
Manila Ave
E Brokaw Rd
N Park Victoria Dr
Middle
eld Rd
S Main St
Alum Rock Ave
N McCarthy Blvd
Berryessa Rd
Lafayette St
S White Rd
E Caribbean Dr
S Mary Ave
Sunnyvale-Saratoga Rd
N 1st St
N San Antonio Rd
N 10th St
N 17th St
Fleming Ave
·109
·262
·130
·237
·84
·87
·85
·82
%&680
%&280
%&880
Project Site City of San José - VMT per Job
Threshold VMT Areas
Regional Average VMT Areas
Mitigatable VMT Areas
Immitigable VMT Areas
City Boundaries
County Boundaries
SJ20-1997_7_Alviso_VMT_Heatmap
0 2.5 5
Miles
San Jose VMT Heat Map
Figure 3
5 - m i l e B u f f e r
2 - m i l e B u f f e r
½ - m i l e B u f f e r
Los Altos
Newark
Mountain View
Sunnyvale
Palo Alto
East
Palo
Alto
Fremont
Los Altos
Hills
San Jose
Milpitas
Santa Clara

ALAMEDA

COUNTY SAN MATEO
COUNTY

SANTA CLARA
COUNTY
3101
Moett Blvd
El Camino Real
E Tasman Dr
W Tasman Dr
Oakland Rd
Warm Springs Blvd
Coleman Ave
N Capitol Ave
Zanker Rd
Lick Mill Blvd
Scott Blvd
Benton St
Orchard Pkwy
Alma St
California St
E El Camino Real
Cropley Ave
Fremont Blvd
N Jackson Ave
E Bayshore Rd
San Antonio Rd
N Mathilda Ave
N 4th St
Manila Ave
E Brokaw Rd
N Park Victoria Dr
Middle
eld Rd
S Main St
Alum Rock Ave
N McCarthy Blvd
Berryessa Rd
Lafayette St
S White Rd
E Caribbean Dr
S Mary Ave
Sunnyvale-Saratoga Rd
N 1st St
N San Antonio Rd
N 10th St
N 17th St
Fleming Ave
·109
·262
·130
·237
·84
·87
·85
·82
%&680
%&280
%&880
Project Site
City Boundaries
County Boundaries
Hotels within ½-mile Buer Radius
Hotels within 2-mile Buer Radius
Hotels within 5-mile Buer Radius
SJ20-1997_8_Alviso_Vicinity_LU
0 2.5 5
Miles
Project Site Vicinity and Similar Adjacent Land Uses
Figure 4
Alviso Hotel Transportation Analysis Report
August 10, 2021
6 2.2 Roadway Facilities
The Project site is in the northern portion of the City of San José. SR 237 provides regional access to the site via interchanges at North First Street and Great America Parkway. Local access is provided by Gold Street, Great America Parkway, Nortech Parkway, North First Street, and Trinity Park Drive.

2.2.1 Roadway Descriptions
The following describes roadways Project-related traffic will most likely travel on within the study area:

SR 237 is an east-west freeway that connects El Camino Real in Mountain View to I-680 in Milpitas. It is defined as a “Freeway” street typology, according to the Envision San José 2040 General Plan Transportation Network Diagram. It runs along the southern edge of the San Francisco Bay, linking the East Bay to the Peninsula. The freeway has two mixed-flow lanes plus one Express Lane in each direction within the study area. Express Lanes provide toll-free travel to carpools, motorcycles, and buses and provide solo drivers the choice to pay a toll to use the lanes during weekdays from 5:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Access to the Project site is provided at the Great America Parkway interchange and North First Street interchange.

Gold Street is a north-south street with one travel lane in each direction and a two-way left-turn lane between Moffat Street and North Taylor Street. It is defined as an “On-Street Primary Bicycle Facility” street typology, according to the Envision San José 2040 General Plan Transportation Network Diagram. It provides access to surrounding residential, commercial, and office land uses. Gold Street connects SR 237 west of the Project site and North First Street.

Great America Parkway is a north-south street with three travel lanes in each direction and a center median.

It provides access to the commercial corridor southwest of the Project site, and connects to SR 237 west of the Project site.

Nortech Parkway is an east-west street with two travel lanes in each direction and a two-way left-turn lane.

It provides access to surrounding office, commercial, and industrial uses. Nortech Parkway connects to North First Street south of the Project site.

North First Street is a north-south street with a northwest-southeast orientation within the study area. North of SR 237, it is defined as a “Main Street” street typology, according to the Envision San José 2040 General Plan Transportation Network Diagram. It is defined as a “Grand Boulevard” street typology south of SR 237.

It has three travel lanes in each direction south of the SR 237 eastbound ramps, two lanes in each direction between the SR 237 eastbound ramps and Tony P. Santos Street, and one lane in each direction north of Tony P. Santos Street. North First Street provides access to residential, commercial, office, and industrial Alviso Hotel Transportation Analysis Report
August 10, 2021
7 uses. It provides direct access to the Project site driveways at Trinity Park Drive/Anderson Alley and proposed Bay Vista Drive driveway.

Trinity Park Drive-Anderson Alley is an east-west street that turns into a north-south oriented street when it meets North First Street. Trinity Park Drive is a residential street with one travel lane in each direction that serves a residential community northwest of the Project site. Anderson Alley is a driveway that provides access to the Project site.

2.3 Transit Facilities
Bus and light rail transit (LRT) service in Santa Clara County is operated by the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA). The Project site is directly served by VTA local bus route 59. The Project site is within walking distance (approximately 750 feet) to the Route 59 bus stops on both sides of North First Street at Tony P. Santos Street. Transfers to bus route 59 include VTA Route 55, Rapid 57, as well as the Blue, Green, and Orange LRT Lines and the ACE Green shuttle. These routes are shown on Figure 5 and route schedules are shown in Table 1. The routes and schedules below reflect Covid-19 reduced service for essential travel.

Table 1: Transit Route Schedules
Route From To
Weekdays Saturdays Sundays and Holidays
Operating
Hours
Headways
(minutes)
Operating
Hours
Headways
(minutes)
Operating
Hours
Headways
(minutes)
VTA Bus
Route 55
Old Ironsides
& Tasman
Stelling &
Stevens
Creek
6:20 AM to
10:45 PM 30 to 60 7:50 AM to 8:00 PM 30 to 60 9:20 AM to 6:00 PM 60 VTA Bus
Route 59
Valley Fair
Transit
Center
Tasman &
Baypointe
6:00 AM to
7:40 PM 30 to 60 8:30 AM to 5:20 PM 60 8:30 AM to 5:20 PM 60 VTA
Rapid 57
West Valley
Fair Transit
Center
Old Ironsides
Station
6:15 AM to
10:50 PM 20 to 60 7:30 AM to 8:50 PM 30 to 60 7:25 AM to 8:30 PM 30 to 60 VTA Blue
Line
Santa Teresa
Station
Baypointe
Station
5:00 AM to
1:15 AM 20 to 45 5:30 AM to 1:15 AM 30 to 45 6:00 AM to 10:55 PM 30 VTA
Green
Line
Winchester
Station
Old Ironsides
Station
5:30 AM to
12:40 AM 20 to 30 6:20 AM to
12:35 AM 30 6:20 AM to
11:00 PM 30
VTA
Orange
Line
Mountain
View Station
Alum Rock
Station
5:30 AM to
12:45 PM 20 to 45 6:00 AM to 12:50 AM 30 to 45 6:00 AM to 11:20 PM 30 Alviso Hotel Transportation Analysis Report
August 10, 2021
8 ACE
Green -
Westbou
nd
Great
America ACE
Amtrak
Station
America
Center
Terminal
6:15 AM to
7:50 AM 45 to 75 No service No service
ACE
Green -
Eastboun
d
America
Center
Terminal
Great
America ACE
Amtrak
Station
3:25 PM to
5:40 PM 120 No service No Service
Notes:

1. Schedules reflect most recent Feb. 8, 2021 service changes.

2. Operating hours rounded to the nearest five minutes.

3. Headways are defined as the time between transit vehicles on the same route.

Source: VTA, March 2020.

2.4 Bicycle Facilities
Bikeway planning and design in California typically rely on guidelines and design standards established by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) in the Highway Design Manual (Chapter 1000:

Bikeway Planning and Design). Caltrans provides for four distinct types of bikeway facilities, as described below and shown in the accompanying figures.
• Class I Bikeways (Shared-Use Paths) provide a completely separate right-of-way and are designated for the exclusive use of bicycles and pedestrians, with vehicle and pedestrian cross-flow minimized.

In general, bike paths serve corridors when on-street facilities are not feasible or where sufficient right-of-way exists to allow them to be constructed.
• Class II Bikeways (Bicycle Lanes) are dedicated lanes for bicyclists generally adjacent to the outer vehicle travel lanes. These lanes have special lane markings, pavement legends, and signage. Bicycle lanes are typically five (5) feet wide. Adjacent vehicle parking and vehicle/pedestrian cross-flow are permitted.

Alviso Hotel Transportation Analysis Report
August 10, 2021
9 • Class III Bikeways (Bicycle Routes) are designated by signs or pavement markings for shared use with pedestrians or motor vehicles, but have no separated bike right-of-way or lane striping. Bike routes serve either to: a) provide a connection to other bicycle facilities where dedicated facilities are infeasible, or b) designate preferred routes through high-demand corridors. • Class IV Bikeways (cycle tracks or “separated” bikeways) provide a right-of-way designated exclusively for bicycle travel within a roadway and are protected from other vehicle traffic by physical barriers, including, but not limited to, grade separation, flexible posts, inflexible vertical barriers such as raised curbs or parked cars.

Alviso Hotel Transportation Analysis Report
August 10, 2021
10 Existing bicycle facilities in the study area are shown on Figure 6. Bicycle connectivity to the Project site is adequate, with Class II bike lanes present along the Project frontage on both sides of North First Street that extend from Liberty Street in the north and East Brokaw Road in the south. However, there are notable missing bicycle connections on Gold Street between the Guadalupe River Trail and North Taylor Street and on North Taylor Street between Gold Street and Liberty Street that would provide bicycle connectivity to the northwestern portion of the Alviso District, as well as to the Bay Trail and the business park fronting the Gold Street Connector. Bike lanes are provided on Nortech Parkway and Disk Drive northwest of the Project site. Great America Parkway has on-street bicycle lanes that extend from SR 237 past US 101 until just south of Central Expressway. Off-street trails along SR 237 connect bicyclists to business districts along North First Street. There are also off-street bicycle trails along the Guadalupe River and San Tomas Aquino Creek that provide access to central San José and Santa Clara. The Project includes an on-site connection to the Guadalupe River Trail at the southern limits of the site, as shown on Figure 2.

2.5 Pedestrian Facilities
Pedestrian facilities consist of sidewalks, crosswalks, and pedestrian signals at signalized intersections. The pedestrian environment was evaluated along the connecting roadways that directly serve the Project site and adjacent roadways that connect to transit stations and/or nearby destinations in the greater study area.

Pedestrian connectivity in the vicinity of the Project site is provided by a mostly complete network of sidewalks and crosswalks that serve the adjacent Alviso neighborhoods. However, there are currently sidewalks missing along the southern side of North First Street between Liberty Street and Tony P. Santos Street; the segment directly fronting the Project site. The approved Top Golf development when constructed will be required to close this sidewalk gap and provide a connection from the Project to the surrounding pedestrian facilities. Pedestrian facilities at study intersections are described below:

Intersection 1 – North First Street & Trinity Park Drive Alviso Hotel Transportation Analysis Report
August 10, 2021
11 • Side-street stop-controlled intersection with a marked stop-controlled crosswalk on the east leg crossing Trinity Park Drive
Intersection 3 – North First Street & Nortech Parkway
• Signalized intersection with marked crosswalks and pedestrian signals on all legs Intersection 4 – North First Street & SR 237 Westbound Ramps • Signalized intersection with marked crosswalks and pedestrian signals on north and west legs Intersection 5 – North First Street & SR 237 Eastbound Ramps • Signalized intersection with marked crosswalks and pedestrian signals on south and west legs Intersection 6 – Great America Parkway & SR 237 Westbound Ramps • Signalized intersection with marked crosswalks and pedestrian signals on north and west legs Intersection 7 – Great America Parkway & SR 237 Eastbound Ramps • Signalized intersection with marked crosswalks and pedestrian signals on south and west legs Don
Edwards
NWR
Sunnyvale
Baylands Park

SUNNYVALE

SAN JOSE

SANTA CLARA
Persian Dr
Great America Way
Lick Mill Blvd
Lafayette St
Great America Pkwy
Old Mountain View-Alviso Rd
Gold St
Nortech Pkwy
East Tasman Dr
Disk Dr
Caribbean Dr
Lawrence Expwy
Zanker Rd
Vista Montaña
N 1st St
Holger Way
West Tasman Dr
Headquarters Dr
Pacic Ave
Rio Robles Dr
Baypointe Pkwy
Los Esteros Rd
Grand Blvd
Reamwood Ave
TrinityPark Dr
·237
59 55 57
59 3
4 1
2 5
Existing Transit Service
Figure 5
SJ20-1997_1_StudyArea
Project Site Local Bus Route/Bus Stop
Frequent Bus
Light Commuter Rail
Altamont Corridor Express (ACE) Green Shuttle Route/Stop 0 0.25 0.5
Miles
57 55 59
Don
Edwards
NWR
Sunnyvale
Baylands Park

SUNNYVALE

SAN JOSE

SANTA CLARA
Persian Dr
Great America Way
Lick Mill Blvd
Lafayette St
Great America Pkwy
Old Mountain View-Alviso Rd
Gold St
Nortech Pkwy
East Tasman Dr
Disk Dr
Caribbean Dr
Lawrence Expwy
Zanker Rd
Vista Montaña
N 1st St
Holger Way
West Tasman Dr
Headquarters Dr
Pacic Ave
Rio Robles Dr
Baypointe Pkwy
Los Esteros Rd
Grand Blvd
Reamwood Ave
TrinityPark Dr
·237
3 4
1 2
5 6
7 Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities
Figure 6
SJ20-1997_1_StudyArea
Project Site
0 0.25 0.5
Miles
Existing Bike Facilities Existing Bike Facilities
Class I Bike Path Trails
Class II Bike Lane
Class III Bike Route
Alviso Hotel Transportation Analysis Report
August 10, 2021
14 3. CEQA Transportation Analysis
This chapter provides a description of the process used to evaluate Project VMT and discusses the Project’s consistency with Envision San José 2040 General Plan.

3.1 CEQA Screening Criteria
The City of San José’s Transportation Analysis Handbook describes the screening criteria used to determine whether a detailed CEQA transportation analysis would be required. Projects that meet the screening criteria “are expected to result in less-than-significant VMT impacts based on Project description, characteristics, and/or location.”
While the City’s screening criteria does not provide a metric to be used for a hotel or similar lodging-related land use, it does provide a screening criteria for local-serving retail of 100,000 square feet of total gross floor area or less without drive-through operations.

3.1.1 Local-Serving Retail Trip Generation Equivalent
Based on conversations with City Staff, it was determined that for VMT screening purposes the conversion of the hotel trip estimates to equivalent shopping center trip estimates would be appropriate to determine the size of a comparable retail site.

The Project is not expected to have an increase on overall VMT within the City. It will likely shorten existing trips currently occurring to other similar uses, thereby reducing overall VMT. Similar to the characteristics of a “local serving retail” land use, the hotel has less potential to generate new trips or VMT; it is more likely rather to divert trips from an existing use, because this new development is in some way more attractive in its location, setting, or otherwise to the traveler. In the case of the proposed Project, the hotel would attract existing hotel trips from the surrounding office developments.

The equivalent local-serving retail site estimates are presented in Table 2 using trip generation estimates, along with rates and data for the Shopping Center land use code 820 from ITE’s Trip Generation Manual.

Alviso Hotel Transportation Analysis Report
August 10, 2021
15 Table 2: Equivalent Retail Site Estimates
Land Use ITE Code Units Size Weekday Daily Trip
Generation Estimate1
Hotel 310 Rooms 215 1,798
Shopping Center2 820 KSF GLA 47.6 1,798
Notes:

1. Estimates generated for proposed Project, taken from Table 6. Trip estimates calculated using daily average rate of 8.36 trips per 1000 SF.

2. Square Footage estimate back-calculated using daily average rate of 37.75.

Fehr & Peers, March 2020.

The square footage of comparable local-serving retail uses presented in Table 2 demonstrates that the size of the proposed Hotel Project falls within the local-retail screening criteria (<100,000 square feet) and a detailed VMT analysis is not required per Council Policy 5-1.

3.2 CEQA Cumulative Analysis
According to the City’s Transportation Analysis Handbook, projects must demonstrate consistency with the Envision San José 2040 General Plan, referred to as the General Plan, to address cumulative impacts. The determination of consistency with the General Plan includes a project’s density, design, and conformance to the goals and policies set forth in the General Plan. This section describes the land use and transportation goals in the General Plan and the Project’s consistency with those goals.

The Project is consistent with the General Plan land use goals by developing in an identified Growth Area to preserve and protect the quality of existing neighborhoods.

The transportation goals in the General Plan aim to complete and maintain a multimodal transportation system with the emphasis on improvements of walking and bicycling facilities, and to maximize efficiency of the existing street system. As described in the existing conditions, the Project is located within a half mile radius of bus stops and provides connection to the Guadalupe River Trail.

The Project is consistent with the General Plan land use and transportation policies in Table 3.

Alviso Hotel Transportation Analysis Report
August 10, 2021
16 Table 3: Envision San José 2040 General Plan Land Use and Transportation Policies Land Use
LU-2.2
Include within the Land Use/Transportation Diagram significant job and housing growth capacity within the following identified growth areas:
• Specific Plan Areas – The City’s Specific Plans provide significant residential growth capacity and opportunities for mixed-use development. Alviso Master Plan…areas also include significant amounts of planned job growth.

Transportation
TR-1.1 Accommodate and encourage use of non-automobile transportation modes to achieve San José’s mobility goals and reduce vehicle trip generation and vehicle miles traveled (VMT).

TR-1.2 Consider impacts on overall mobility and all travel modes when evaluating transportation impacts of new developments or infrastructure projects.

TR-1.7
Require that private streets be designed, constructed and maintained to provide safe, comfortable, and attractive access and travel for motorists and for pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users of all ages, abilities, and preferences.

TR-2.2
Provide a continuous pedestrian and bicycle system to enhance connectivity throughout the City by completing missing segments. Eliminate or minimize physical obstacles and barriers that impede pedestrian and bicycle movement on City streets…
TR-2.8
Require new development where feasible to provide on-site facilities such as bicycle storage and showers, provide connections to existing and planned facilities, dedicate land to expand existing facilities or provide new facilities such as sidewalks and/or bicycle lanes/paths, or share in the cost of improvements.

TR-2.18 Provide bicycle storage facilities as identified in the San José Bicycle Master Plan.

TR-5.5
Require that new development, which includes new public or private streets, connect these streets with the existing public street network and prohibit the gating of private streets with the intention of restricting public access. Furthermore, where possible, require that the street network within a given project consists of integrated short blocks to facilitate bicycle and pedestrian travel and access.

Source: Envision San José 2040 General Plan, July, 2020.

Alviso Hotel Transportation Analysis Report
August 10, 2021
17 4. Local Transportation Analysis
This chapter presents the Project effects on the transportation system to meet City analysis requirements for development application purposes. It describes the process used to estimate the amount of Projectgenerated traffic generated and the assignment of Project-generated trips to the transportation system.

This chapter also assesses the site plan regarding access for all modes, evaluates vehicle queuing at site access points, and compares the proposed parking supply to City code requirements.

4.1 Study Intersections
The City’s Handbook indicates that intersections should be evaluated if the Project contributes ten or more vehicle trips per hour per lane to a signalized intersection. The following study intersections, followed by the jurisdictional criteria in parentheses, were selected in consultation with City staff:

1. North First Street & Trinity Park Drive (City of San José)

2. North First Street & Bay Vista Drive (new intersection, City of San José)

3. North First Street & Nortech Parkway (City of San José)

4. North First Street & SR 237 WB Ramps (City of San José and CMP)

5. North First Street & SR 237 EB Ramps (City of San José and CMP)

6. Great America Parkway & SR 237 WB Ramps (City of San José and CMP)

7. Great America Parkway & SR 237 EB Ramps (City of San José and CMP)

4.2 Analysis Scenarios
Roadway system operations are evaluated during the weekday morning (AM) and weekday afternoon (PM) peak hours for the following scenarios:

Existing Conditions – The analysis of existing conditions was based on traffic counts obtained from the City of San José, provided in Appendix A. These counts were scoped to be supplemented with new manual turning-movement counts to be collected in 2020. However, travel patterns were disrupted due to Covid19 and counts collected would not have reflected “normal” pre-Covid-19 conditions. Therefore, a 1% per year growth rate was applied to the City’s 2015-2016 traffic counts to develop pre-Covid-19 2020 traffic volumes used in this scenario.

Background Conditions – Future traffic forecasts without the proposed Project were developed for the Background Conditions by adding traffic from approved but not yet constructed and occupied Alviso Hotel Transportation Analysis Report
August 10, 2021
18 developments in the vicinity of the Project site to the Existing Conditions traffic counts. The City’ of San José provided this information via their Approved Trip Inventory (ATI), which is provided in Appendix B.

Background Plus Project Conditions – This traffic scenario provides an assessment of operating conditions under Background Conditions with the addition of Project-generated traffic and transportation network infrastructure proposed by the Project.

4.3 Analysis Methods
The operations of roadway facilities are described with the term level of service (LOS), a qualitative description of traffic flow based on such factors as speed, travel time, delay, and freedom to maneuver. Six levels are defined from LOS A, with little or no delay, to LOS F, with excessive delay. LOS E represents “atcapacity” operations. When traffic volumes exceed the intersection capacity, stop-and-go conditions result, and operations are designated as LOS F.

4.3.1 Signalized Intersection Operations
The method described in Chapter 16 of the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) (Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board) was used to prepare the level of service calculation for the study intersections. This level of service method, which is approved by the City of San José and VTA, analyzes a signalized intersection’s operation based on average control delay per vehicle. Control delay includes the initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. The average control delay is calculated using the TRAFFIX analysis software and is correlated to an LOS designation as shown in Table 4.

Alviso Hotel Transportation Analysis Report
August 10, 2021
19 Table 4: Signalized Intersection Level of Service Definitions Level of
Service Description Average Delay per Vehicle (seconds) A Operations with very low delay occurring with favorable progression and/or short cycle lengths. ≤ 10.0
B+
B
BOperations with low delay occurring with good progression and/or short cycle lengths.

10.1 to 12.0

12.1 to 18.0

18.1 to 20.0
C+
C
COperations with average delays resulting from fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures begin to appear.

20.1 to 23.0

23.1 to 32.0

32.1 to 35.0
D+
D
DOperations with longer delays due to a combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, and high volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratios. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable.

35.1 to 39.0

39.1 to 51.0

51.1 to 55.0
E+
E
EOperations with high delay values indicating poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high V/C ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences.

55.1 to 60.0

60.1 to 75.0

75.1 to 80.0
F Operations with delays unacceptable to most drivers occurring due to oversaturation, poor progression, or very long cycle lengths. > 80.0 Sources: Traffic Level of Service Analysis Guidelines, October 2014, VTA Congestion Management Program, June 2003; and Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2000.

4.3.2 Unsignalized Intersection Operations
The operations of the unsignalized intersections were evaluated using the method contained in Chapter 17 of the 2000 HCM. LOS ratings for stop-sign-controlled intersections are based on the average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle. At two-way or side-street-controlled intersections, the average control delay is calculated for each stopped movement, not for the intersection as a whole. For approaches composed of a single lane, the control delay is computed as the average of all movements in that lane.

Table 5 summarizes the relationship between delay and LOS for unsignalized intersections.

Alviso Hotel Transportation Analysis Report
August 10, 2021
20 Table 5: Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Definitions Level of Service Description Average Delay per
Vehicle (seconds)
A Little or no delay. ≤ 10.0
B Short traffic delays. 10.1 to 15.0
C Average traffic delays. 15.1 to 25.0
D Long traffic delays. 25.1 to 35.0
E Very long traffic delays. 35.1 to 50.0
F Extreme traffic delays with intersection capacity exceeded. > 50.0 Sources: Traffic Level of Service Analysis Guidelines, October 2014, VTA Congestion Management Program, June 2003; and Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2000.

Additionally, the City of San José applies the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) peak-hour volume signal warrant to evaluate operations at unsignalized intersections to verify whether the addition of Project-generated traffic will create an operation problem at the intersection.1 Warrant 3 – Peak hour vehicle volume
This warrant determines if the minor street traffic suffers undue delay when entering or crossing the major street for a minimum of one hour of an average day. This is based on the major street left turn volume, the higher-volume minor-street approach volume, and calculated delay for vehicles on the higher-volume minor-street approach.

4.4 Adverse Effect Criteria
This section outlines the City of San José and CMP intersection adverse effect criteria. A project’s contribution to a significant adverse effects on signalized intersections is considered improved when the improvement measure causes the intersection to operate at an acceptable level, delays are lower than they would be under No-Project conditions, or less than a four second increase occurs at intersections that operate at unacceptable levels.
1 Signal warrant analysis is intended to examine the general correlation between the planned level of future development and the need to install new traffic signals. It estimates future development-generated traffic compared to a sub-set of the standard traffic signal warrants recommended in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) guidelines. While satisfying one or more of these warrants could justify the installation of a signal at an intersection, this analysis should not serve as the only basis for deciding whether and when to install a signal. To reach such a decision, the full set of warrants should be investigated by an experienced engineer based on field-measured rather than forecast traffic data and a thorough study of traffic and roadway conditions. Furthermore, the decision to install a signal should not be based solely upon the warrants, since the installation of signals may lead to certain types of collisions. The City of San Jose should undertake regular monitoring of actual traffic conditions and accident data, and timely re-evaluation of the full set of warrants to prioritize and program intersections for signalization.

Alviso Hotel Transportation Analysis Report
August 10, 2021
21 4.4.1 City of San José Criteria
Significant adverse effects at signalized City of San José study intersections would occur when the addition of Project traffic causes one of the following:
• An intersection to deteriorate from an acceptable level of service (LOS D or better) to an unacceptable level (LOS E or F); or,
• An intersection already operating at LOS E or F to:
o Exacerbates unacceptable operations by increasing the critical delay more than four seconds and increasing the volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratio by 0.01 or more; or o An increase in the V/C ratio of 0.01 or more at an intersection with unacceptable operations when the change in critical delay is negative (i.e., decreases). This can occur if the critical movements change.

The City of San José minimum threshold for acceptable signalized intersection operations is LOS D, unless governed by an Area Development Policy, or protected intersection designation. All study intersections are within the boundaries of the Alviso Planning Area. For the purpose of this analysis, LOS D is used as the minimum threshold for signalized study intersections in San José.

The LOS standard for CMP intersections is LOS E. Traffic adverse effects at these intersections would occur when the addition of traffic associated with a project causes:
• Intersection operations to deteriorate from an acceptable level (LOS E or better) to an unacceptable level (LOS F); or
• Exacerbates unacceptable operations by increasing the average critical delay more than four seconds and increasing the critical volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratio by 0.01 or more at an intersection operating at LOS F; or
• The V/C ratio increases by 0.01 or more at an intersection with unacceptable operations (LOS F) when the change in critical delay is negative (i.e., decreases). This can occur if the critical movements change.

4.5 Project Trips
The amount of traffic added to the roadway system by a proposed development is estimated using a threestep process: (1) trip generation, (2) trip distribution, and (3) trip assignment. The first step estimates the amount of traffic added to the roadway network. The second step estimates the directions of travel to and from the Project site. The new vehicle trips are assigned to specific street segments and intersection turning Alviso Hotel Transportation Analysis Report
August 10, 2021
22 movements in the third step. The results of this process for the proposed Project are described in the following sections.

4.5.1 Trip Generation Estimates
Vehicle trip generation estimates for the proposed hotel were generated using rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition). Rates for the Hotel (ITE Land Use Code 310), were used. Then, a location-based adjustment was calculated using the City of San José VMT Evaluation Tool based on the 47,600 square feet of retail space (see conversion from hotel to retail in Chapter 3), and a place-type of suburbs with single-family housing. A screenshot from the first page of the City’s VMT Evaluation Tool, which was used to inform the location-based adjustment to trip generation, is provided in Appendix C. Trip generation estimates for peak AM, peak PM, and daily are shown in Table 6.

The Project with the location-based adjustment is expected to add 1,642 daily trips, including 93 AM and 118 PM peak hour trips.

Table 6: Alviso Hotel Trip Generation Estimates
Land Use Rooms
Weekday AM Trips Weekday PM Trips Daily Trips
In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total
Hotel¹ 215 60 42 102 66 63 129 899 899 1,798
Deduction with Location
Based Adjustment of 91.2%² (5) (4) (9) (6) (5) (11) (78) (78) (156) Total 55 38 93 60 58 118 821 821 1,642
Notes:

1. Hotel land use code 310, ITE, Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, 2017. Trip estimates calculated using average rates.

Daily rate = 8.36; In = 50%; Out = 50%
AM rate = 0.47; In = 59%; Out = 41%
PM rate = 0.6; In = 51%; Out = 49%

2. Location based adjustment calculated using City of San José VMT Evaluation Tool based on 47,600 square feet of retail space at the Project site (APN 015-39-020).

Fehr & Peers, March 2020.

4.5.2 Trip Distribution and Assignment
The distribution of the traffic generated by the Project onto the roadway system was based on the locations of complementary land uses, prevailing travel patterns, population densities in nearby neighborhoods and communities, and patterns used in recent TIAs completed in the area. The trip distribution percentages are listed below and shown on Figure 7:
• 20% to/from North First Street south of the Project site • 10% to/from Great America Parkway southwest of the Project site • 5% to/from Gold Street northwest of the Project site
Alviso Hotel Transportation Analysis Report
August 10, 2021
23 • 25% to/from SR 237 east of the Project site
• 40% to/from SR 237 west of the Project site (of this 40%, 15% using Great America Parkway interchange and 25% using North First Street interchange) Project trips were assigned to the roadway network based on the trip distribution. Figure 8 presents the AM and PM peak hour Project trips assigned to each turning movement at the study intersections.

Don
Edwards
NWR
Sunnyvale
Baylands Park

SUNNYVALE

SAN JOSE

SANTA CLARA
Persian Dr
Great America Way
Lick Mill Blvd
Lafayette St
Great America Pkwy
Old Mountain View-Alviso Rd
Gold St
Nortech Pkwy
East Tasman Dr
Disk Dr
Caribbean Dr
Lawrence Expwy
Zanker Rd
Vista Montaña
N 1st St
Holger Way
West Tasman Dr
Headquarters Dr
Pacic Ave
Rio Robles Dr
Baypointe Pkwy
Los Esteros Rd
Grand Blvd
Reamwood Ave
TrinityPark Dr
·237
3 4
1 2
5 40%
10%
5%
25%
20%
Project Trip Distribution
Figure 7
SJ20-1997_3_TripDistro
Project Site XX% Project Trip Distribution
0 0.25 0.5
Miles
6 7
Project Site
# Study Intersection
3 4
1 2
5 Project Trip Assignment
Figure 8
SJ20-1997_4_TripAssign
Project Site Study Intersection # New Intersection with Project XX (YY) AM (PM) Peak Hour Trac Volumes Signalized Intersection STOP Stop Sign 10 (11) 11 (17)
7 (10) 4 (4) 12 (13)

1. North 1st St/Trinity Park Dr/Anderson Alley
Anderson Alley Trinity Park Dr N 1st St
A
AF
CF
14 (15)
6 (9)4 (6)

6. Great America Pkwy/SR 237 WB Ramps
SR 237 WB Ramp
Great America Pkwy
C
CF
6 (6)
8 (9) 4 (6)

7. Great America Pkwy/SR 237 EB Ramps
A
C
C
39 (42)
27 (41)

3. North 1st Street/Nortech Parkway
Driveway Nortech Pkwy N 1st St
C
C
25 (27)
10 (15)17 (26)
14 (15)

4. North 1st Street/SR 237 WB Ramps
SR 237 WB On SR 237 WB Off N 1st St
C
CF F
11 (12)
8 (12)10 (15)
14 (15)

5. North 1st Street/Oakcrest/SR 237 EB Ramps
Oakcrest Estates SR 237 EB On N 1st St
C
AC F
SR 237 EB Off-ramp
29 (32)10 (11)
20 (30) 12 (13) 7 (10)

2. North 1st St/Bay Vista Drive
Bay Vista Dr
N 1st St
F
AC
CF
STOP
0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)

1. North 1st Street/Nortech Parkway
Driveway Nortech Pkwy N 1st St BF
ACE
ACE
ABF 0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)

2. North 1st Street/SR 237 WB Ramps
SR 237 WB On SR 237 WB Off N 1st St
AACC
CE
ABF 0 (0)
0 (0)0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)

3. North 1st Street/Oakcrest/SR 237 EB Ramps
Oakcrest Estates SR 237 EB On N 1st St AF
ACCF
AACCE
ABF
SR 237 EB Off-ramp
SR 237 WB Ramp
Great America Pkwy
Alviso Hotel Transportation Analysis Report
August 10, 2021
26 4.6 Intersection Operations Analysis
Intersection operations analysis was conducted using the analysis methods described above. Each scenario is discussed in the following sections. Detailed operations calculation worksheets are provided in Appendix D.

4.6.1 Existing Conditions
Existing traffic volumes are shown on Figure 9. All study intersections operate at LOS C or better under Existing Conditions, as shown in Table 7.

Table 7: Existing Conditions Intersection Operations
Intersection Control¹ LOS
Threshold² Peak Hour Average Delay³ LOS⁴

1. North First St & Trinity Park Dr SSSC D (San José) AM PM

0.6 (10.6)

0.3 (11.1)
B (B)
B (B)

2. North First St & Bay Vista Dr SSSC D (San José) AM
PM Exists only with Project

3. North First St & Nortech Pkwy Signal D (San José) AM PM

11.8 18.6
B+
B4. North First St & SR 237 WB Ramps Signal E (CMP) AM PM

18.2 17.8
BB

5. North First St & SR 237 EB Ramps Signal E (CMP) AM
PM

26.1 22.3
C
C+

6. Great America Pkwy & SR 237 WB Ramps Signal E (CMP) AM PM

18.1 23.9
BC

7. Great America Pkwy & SR 237 EB Ramps Signal E (CMP) AM PM

12.8 10.4
B
B+
Notes:

1. SSSC = side street stop-controlled; Signal = Signalized

2. LOS threshold is the minimum acceptable LOS (the threshold between acceptable and unacceptable level of service) by jurisdictional criteria.

3. Delay expressed in seconds per vehicle calculated using methods described in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, with adjusted saturation flow rates to reflect Santa Clara County Conditions for signalized intersections. Signalized intersection average control delay is calculated using weighted average delay of whole intersection. SSSC intersection average control delay is calculated for each stopped movement, not for the intersection as a whole. For approaches composed of a single lane, the control delay is computed as the average of all movements in that lane.

4. LOS calculations conducted using the TRAFFIX analysis software packages, which applies the methods described in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual.

Source: Fehr & Peers, July 2020.

Alviso Hotel Transportation Analysis Report
August 10, 2021
27 4.6.2 Background Conditions
Background Conditions traffic volumes were developed by adding the City’s ATI volumes to existing volumes, as shown on Figure 10. Background Plus Project volumes on Figure 11 were developed by adding Project trip assignment volumes on Figure 8 to Background volumes on Figure 10.

The approved Top Golf development is conditioned to install a traffic signal at the Trinity Park Drive & North First Street, which is currently side-street stop-controlled but will serve as the Top Golf development’s main project access point once it is developed. Thus, under Background and Background Plus Project conditions the intersection of Trinity Park Drive & North First Street is assumed to be signal controlled.

Under Background No Project and Plus Project conditions, all intersections, except for the intersection North First Street and SR 237 Westbound Ramps, operate at acceptable levels. The intersection of North First Street and SR 237 Westbound Ramps operates at an unacceptable LOS F without and with the Project during the PM peak hour. Intersection operations under Background and Background Plus Project conditions are summarized in Table 8.

Table 8: Background Conditions Intersection Operations
Intersection Control¹ LOS
Threshold²
Peak
Hour
Background Background Plus Project
Average
Delay³ LOS⁴ Average Delay³ LOS⁴
Δ in
Critical
V/C5
Δ in
Critical
Delay6

1. North First St &
Trinity Park Dr⁷ Signal D (San José) AMPM

16.8 18.6
B
B17.819.7
B
B0.0210.024

0.1 0.2

2. North First St &
Bay Vista Dr SSSC D (San José) AMPM
Exists only with
Project

0.5 (10.8)

0.6 (13.8)
B (B)
B (B)

0.031

0.068

0.5 0.6

3. North First St &
Nortech Pkwy Signal D (San José) AMPM

21.8 38.0
C+
D+

21.8 39.4
C+
D

0.000

0.013
-0.2

1.7 4. North First St &
SR 237 WB Ramps Signal E (CMP) AMPM

27.0 134.1
C
F

29.0 140.2
C
F

0.019

0.014

3.1 8.8

5. North First St &
SR 237 EB Ramps Signal E (CMP) AMPM

38.8 35.5
D+
D+

39.9 37.3
D
D+

0.007

0.009

1.4 3.0

6. Great America Pkwy
& SR 237 WB Ramps Signal E (CMP) AMPM

16.8 24.1
B
C

0.004

0.1 0.0

7. Great America Pkwy
& SR 237 EB Ramps Signal E (CMP) AMPM

14.6 13.8
B
B

14.8 14.1
B
B

0.006

0.2 0.2
Notes:

1. SSSC = side street stop-controlled; Signal = Signalized

2. LOS Threshold is the minimum acceptable LOS (the threshold between acceptable and unacceptable level of service) by jurisdictional criteria.

3. Delay expressed in seconds per vehicle calculated using methods described in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, with adjusted saturation flow rates to reflect Santa Clara County Conditions for signalized intersections. Signalized intersection average control Alviso Hotel Transportation Analysis Report
August 10, 2021
28 delay is calculated using weighted average delay of whole intersection. SSSC intersection average control delay is calculated for each stopped movement, not for the intersection as a whole. For approaches composed of a single lane, the control delay is computed as the average of all movements in that lane.

4. LOS calculations conducted using the TRAFFIX analysis software packages, which applies the methods described in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual.

5. Change in critical volume to capacity ratio between Background and Background Plus Project conditions.

6. Change in average critical movement delay between Background and Background Plus Project conditions.

7. Intersection is assumed to be signalized under Background Conditions based on TopGolf Project’s conditions of approval.

Bold text indicates intersection operates at an unacceptable level of service. Bold and underlined text indicates an adverse effect.

Source: Fehr & Peers, July 2020.

4.6.3 Background Intersection Adverse Effects & Improvement Measures Based on the criteria discussed above, the addition of Project trips in the PM peak hour at the intersection of North First Street & SR 237 WB Ramps would result in an adverse effect because the Project increases the V/C ratio by a value of 0.014 and increases critical delay by 8.8 seconds.

The adverse effect will be addressed by the Project paying its fair share of traffic impact fees (TIF) into the North San Jose Area Development Policy (NSJADP) based on Project PM peak hour trips traveling into the NSJADP. While the Project itself is not located within the boundaries of the NSJADP, based on the trip assignment presented in Figure 8, the project would generate 38 PM peak hour trips into and out of the NSJADP. The current fee is $18,725 per PM peak hour trip, as of July 1, 2021.

4.6.4 Peak Hour Signal Warrant Analysis
The peak hour volume signal warrant as described previously in section 4.3.2 was used to analyze unsignalized intersection operations at North First Street and Bay Vista Drive. Peak hour warrants were not met for either AM or PM peak hour conditions under the Background Plus Project scenario. Signal warrant worksheets are provided in Appendix E.

4.6.5 Left Turn Storage Analysis
The addition of Project traffic along the roadway network has the potential to add vehicles to left-turn movements such that the left-turn queues would exceed the turn pocket storage lengths. Queues that exceed the turn pocket storage length can impede through traffic movement along an approach. Potentially affected intersections were selected for this evaluation based on where the Project would add a minimum of 10 vehicles to a dedicated left-turn movement in at least one of the peak hours, which includes the following signalized intersections:
• Intersection 1: North First Street & Trinity Park Drive (Northbound left-turn pocket) • Intersection 2: North First Street & Bay Vista Drive (Northbound left-turn pocket) • Intersection 5: North First Street & SR 237 EB ramps (Southbound left-turn pocket) Alviso Hotel Transportation Analysis Report
August 10, 2021
29 • Intersection 7: Great America Parkway & SR 237 EB ramps (Eastbound left-turn pocket) The 95th percentile queues from the TRAFFIX LOS analysis were used to evaluate the projected queues at the identified left-turn movements for the Background and Background Plus Project Conditions. The results of the left-turn queue analysis are presented in Table 9.

San Jose City CouncilAugust 9, 2022

San Jose City Council
August 9, 2022