Agenda packet — Santa Monica City Council, August 27, 2024 (part 4 of 7)

G:\Project Files\2971 Santa Monica 2800 AA Bldg Remodel\01-Drawings\01-Revit\3-CD\2971 Santa Monica 2800 AA Bldg Remodel.rvt3/23/2023 5:19:10 PM 2800 AIRPORT AVENUE
SANTA MONICA CALIFORNIA 90405
A3.0 JSJSLNSANTA MONICA 3/15/23 2971 SANTA MONICA 2800 AA BLDG REMODEL 90% SUBMITTAL

DEMOLITION REFLECTIVE

CEILING PLAN
VC
N
1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"

DEMOLITION REFLECTIVE CELING PLAN

DEMOLITION KEYNOTES
H REMOVE EXISTING ELECTRICAL LIGHT FIXTURE, ETC. AND PREPARE FOR NEW ELECTRICAL WORK.

R REMOVE EXISTING GYB. BD CEILING. PREPARE AREA FOR NEW WORK.

WALL LEGEND

DEMO SYMBOL LEGEND
NO. REVISION DATE ISSUED

DEMOLITION NOTES

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR BIDDING ONLY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D

5.J.e
Packet Pg. 755 Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2) SD
SD
SD SD
SD
SD

SD SD SD

SD SD SD SD
SD
SD
SD
SD SD
SD
SD
SD
SD SD
SD
F SDF
F
F
F
F
T
F
F
F
F
F
F
SD
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
SD
SD
SD
SDF
SDF
1 A4.1
TYP.

OF 6
TYP.

OF 4
TYP.

OF 8 TYP.

OF 2
61 36
20 36
61 36

CLASSROOM
102

CLASSROOM
104

CLASSROOM
101

CLASSROOM
103
OFFICE
107
MECH. ROOM
109

HALLWAY
106

CLASSROOM
124

CLASSROOM
123
OFFICE
111

ELECTRICAL
ROOM
118

HALLWAY
116A HALLWAY
116B
MEN'S

RESTROOM
127

DRESSING ROOM
115

HALLWAY
110
FOYER
100

HALLWAY
108

WOMEN'S

RESTROOM
126
LOBBY
119

HALLWAY
112
(FINISHED TO BE

DONE BY TENANT)
TYP.

OF 9
TYP.

OF 14
TYP.

OF 2
TYP.

OF 12
TYP.

OF 6
TYP.

OF 2
TYP.

OF 7
(NO WORK)
02 02
61 36
61 36
02 61 36
02 02
61 36
02 61 36
61 36
61 36
61 36
02 02
02 02 02 TYP.

OF 12
02 61 36
61 36
61 36 61 36
02 TYP.

OF 3
20 02
20 36
02 TYP.

OF 4
61 36
(FINISHED TO BE

DONE BY TENANT)

WORKSHOP
117
65 65
65 65
66 66
66 66
66 66
66 66
66 20
3' - 0"
02 TYP.

OF 2
A2.2 4
02 TYP.

OF 2
36 02
65 65
65 65
27 27
OS
OS
OS
OS
OS
OS OS
OS
EXISTING WALLS TO REMAIN. PATCH AND REPAIR

TO MATCH EXISTING FINISHES WHERE DAMAGED
BY DEMOLITION.

WALLS / ITEMS TO BE DEMOLISHED
NEW 2x WOOD STUDS AT 16" O.C. WITH FINISHES
PER MATERIAL SCHEDULE.

NEW 8X8X16 CMU WALL

CLEAN / REINSTALL EXISTING SUPPLY AIR

GRILLES

CLEAN / REINSTALL EXISTING RETURN AIR

GRILLES

REINSTALL EXISTING SMOKE DETECTOR

REINSTALL EXISTING FIRE ALARM

NEW LIGHT FIXTURE

EXISTING SUPPLY AIR GRILLES

EXISTING RETURN AIR GRILLES

EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURE

EXISTING SMOKE DETECTOR

EXISTING FIRE ALARM

EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURE

EXISTING DATA OUTLET TO REMAIN

EXISTING JUNCTION BOX TO REMAIN
NEW CABINET FAN EXHAUST. SEE MECHANICAL

DRAWINGS
NEW OCCUPANCY SENSOR. SEE ELECTRICAL

DRAWINGS
OS
A. ELECTRICAL / MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND DEVICES: REINSTALL AND PROPERLY RECONNECT EXISTING DUCTWORK; SWITCHES; THERMOSTATS; AND OTHER EXISTING ELEC./MECH., EQUIPMENT AND DEVICES REMOVED DURING THE WORK BUT NOT INDICATED TO BE REMOVED. REINSTALL ONLY EQUIPMENT AND DEVICES THAT ARE IN GOOD CONDITION. DISCARD EQUIPMENT AND

DEVICES THAT ARE NOT IN CONDITION AT LEAST AS GOOD AS EXISTED BEFORE REMOVAL, AND PROVIDE NEW EQUIVALENT EQUIPMENT AND DEVICES. NEW

EQUIPMENT AND DEVICES SHALL EXACTLY MATCH THOSE REMOVED IN TYPE,

SIZE, FINISH, CONFIGURATION , AND OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. ALL INSTALLATION SHALL MEET CURENT BUILDING CODE.

B. PROVIDE NEW MATERIALS TO MATCH EXISTING UNDISTURBED WORK FOR CLOSING OF OPENINGS, REPAIRS, AND RENOVATION. NEW FINISH MATERIALS

AND SUBSTRATES TO MATCH EXISTING SHALL BE THE SAME TYPES, SIZES, QUALITIES, AND COLORS AS EXISTING ADJACENT MATERIAL. REPAIR ALL

DAMAGED OR DEFACED FLOOR, WALL, AND CEILING FINISHES ASSOCIATED WITH THESE ALTERATIONS.

C. THE CONTRACTOR/SUB-CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT THE PLANS TO THE FIRE DEPARTMENT FOR DEFERED APPROVAL. USE THE EXISTING EQUIPMENT WHERE POSSIBLE.

D. WHERE EXISTING PLUMBING VENT PIPES ARE REMOVED FROM THE ROOF AND

NEW ONES ARE INSTALLED THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PATCH AND REPAIR THE ROOF. THE PATCHING AND REPAIR SHALL BE DONE USING A SUB-

CONTRACTOREXPERIENCED WITH ROOFING IN GENERAL AND ROOFING REPAIRS.

E. FLOOR COVERING MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ASTM STANDARD E 648, AND HAVING A SPECIFIC OPTICAL DENSITY SMOKE RATING NOT TO EXCEED 450 PER ASTM E 662. CBC 804.4
Edward
Lok Ng
C-16840
REN.11/30/23

L ICENSED
A

RCHITECT
STAT E
OF
CA
L

I FORN IA
Client:

Consultant:

CAD Draft:

Architect:

Engineer:

Job Number:

Date Issue:

Client:

Designer: Architecture
InteriorsPlanning
1511 Cota Ave. Long Beach, CA 90813 Tel. 562-912-7900
These drawings and accompanying, as instruments of service, are the exclusive property of the Architect and their use and publication shall be restricted to the original site for which they were prepared. Re-use, reproduction or publication by any method, in whole or part, is prohibited by writtenpermission from the Architect. Title to these plans and specifications shall remain with the Architect without prejudice, and visual with them shall constitute prima facie eveidence of acceptance of these restrictions.

G:\Project Files\2971 Santa Monica 2800 AA Bldg Remodel\01-Drawings\01-Revit\3-CD\2971 Santa Monica 2800 AA Bldg Remodel.rvt3/23/2023 5:19:11 PM 2800 AIRPORT AVENUE
SANTA MONICA CALIFORNIA 90405
A3.1 JSJSLNSANTA MONICA 3/15/23
2971
SANTA MONICA 2800 AA BLDG

REMODEL
90% SUBMITTAL

RENOVATION

REFELECTIVE CEILING
PLAN
VC
N
1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"

RENOVATION REFLECTIVE CELING PLAN

RENOVATION KEYNOTES
02 NEW LED LIGHTING FIXTURES. SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWING FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.
20 NEW GYP. BD. CEILING. PROVIDE NEW INSULATION.
27 NEW R-30 CEILING INSULATION. CEILING FINISH TO BE DONE BY TENANT. 36 EXISTING SMOKE DETECTOR AND ANY DEVICES CONNECTED TO EXISTING FIRE ALARM SYSTEM NOT LIMITED TO SMOKE DETECTOR TO REMAIN. PROTEC IN PLACE. 61 PATCH AND REPAIR DAMAGED CEILING AS NEEDED. TO MATCH EXISTING. 65 NEW HEAT PUMP FAN COIL UNIT. SEE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. 66 PROVIDE NEW EXHAUST. SEE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS.

WALL LEGEND

RENOVATION SYMBOL LEGEND
NO. REVISION DATE ISSUED

RENOVATION NOTES

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR BIDDING ONLY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D

5.J.e
Packet Pg. 756 Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2) 6' - 0"
9' - 0"
P-1
CT-2 CT-2
P-1
21 P-2
LAV-1
P-1
CT-2
6 A5.0
3 LAV-1 LAV-1 WC-1 WC-1 WC-1 WC-2
21 CT-2
P-1
21 21 21
4 4 1 1 1 3
5 2 2 2
2 CT-2
P-1
WC-2
3 2 1
A5.0
2 6' - 0"
9' - 0"
21 P-1
CT-2
P-2
6 P-1
CT-2
WC-2
1 2
3 A5.0
2 WC-2 WC-1
21 21
LAV-1 LAV-1 UR-2 UR-1
UR-1
CT-2
P-1
3 1 4 4
2 2 5
CT-2
P-1
CT-2
P-1
CT-2
A5.0
4 UR-2
9' - 0"
P-1
RB-1 11 RB-1 P-1 78 RB-1
P-3
P-2
P-1
RB-1 RB-1
P-1
RBP-3-1
9' - 1 1/4"
OPEN
P-1 P-1
RB-1 RB-1 RB-1
OPEN
(N) WOOD BEAM
(N) WOOD BEAM
16' - 0" 12' - 0"
P-1
OPEN
P-3
RB-1
P-1
P-1
P-31

1. UNLESS SPECIFICALLY INDICATED OTHERWISE, PRODUCTS

SCHEDULED INDICATE QUALITY STANDARD REQUIRED, BUT ARE NOT INTENDED TO LIMIT COMPETITION. LISTED COLORS AND FINISHES ESTABLISH COLOR AND FINISH REQUIRED. EXCEPT FOR PRODUCTS NOTED AS "OWNER'S STANDARD," APPROVED EQUAL PRODUCTS MAY

BE SUBMITTED FOR OWNER REPRESENTATIVE'S REVIEW AND
APPROVAL. CONTRACTOR MAY REQUEST APPROVAL FROM OWNER

TO USE OR SUBSTITUTE ENVIRONMENTALLY PREFERABLE PRODUCTS AND RECYCLED PRODUCTS.

2. COLORS AND FINISHES SHALL MATCH SAMPLES AVAILABLE FOR VIEW

BY CONTRACTOR AT OWNER REPRESENTATIVE'S PROJECT SITE
OFFICE. ARCHITECT IS SOLE JUDGE OF COLOR AND FINISH MATCH.

3. WHERE "MATCH EXISTING" IS INDICATED, PROVIDE NEW MATERIAL AS NECESSARY TO PATCH OR EXTEND EXISTING MATERIAL. UNLESS AN

EXCEPTION IS SPECIFICALLY NOTED, NEW MATERIAL SHALL MATCH

EXISTING IN TYPE, MATERIAL, SIZE, THICKNESS, COLOR, AND PATTERN.

4. WHERE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS REQUIRE COLOR MATCH, BUT

EXISTING COLOR'S NAME IS UNKNOWN, MATCH COLORS AS NEARLY AS PRACTICABLE BY FIELD COMPARISON. ARCHITECT IS SOLE JUDGE OF COLOR MATCH ACCURACY. MISMATCHED COLORS WHERE MATCH
IS REQUIRED WILL BE REJECTED.

Edward
Lok Ng
C-16840
REN.11/30/23

L ICENSED ARCHITECT
STAT E OF CA L I FORN IA Client: Consultant: CAD Draft: Architect: Engineer:

Job Number:

Date Issue:

Client:

G:\Project Files\2971 Santa Monica 2800 AA Bldg Remodel\01-Drawings\01-Revit\3-CD\2971 Santa Monica 2800 AA Bldg Remodel.rvt3/23/2023 5:19:14 PM 2800 AIRPORT AVENUE
SANTA MONICA CALIFORNIA 90405
A4.0 JSJSLNSANTA MONICA 3/15/23 2971 SANTA MONICA 2800 AA BLDG REMODEL 90% SUBMITTAL

INTERIOR ELEVATIONS VC
N
O. REVISIO
N
D
A
TE IS
S
UED
1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
WOMEN'S RESTROOM - NORTH 2 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"WOMEN'S RESTROOM - EAST 3 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"WOMEN'S RESTROOM - SOUTH 4 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

WOMEN'S RESTROOM - WEST
5 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
MEN'S RESTROOM - NORTH 6 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"MEN'S RESTROOM - EAST 7 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"MEN'S RESTROOM - SOUTH 8 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

MEN'S RESTROOM - WEST
9 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
LOBBY - EAST 10 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"LOBBY - SOUTH
11 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
LOBBY - WEST 12 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

LOBBY - NORTH

RENOVATION KEYNOTES
11 NEW HOLLOW METAL DOOR AND HOLLOW METAL FRAME.
21 REINSTALL TOILET PARTITIONS AND PROVIDE NEW ATTACHED TOILET ACCESSORIES. 78 NEW WALL INFILL TO MATCH EXISTING, BY FILLING WITH CONCRETE AND #4 REBARS @12" O.C. EACH WAY AT CENTER OF WALL. PROVIDE #4 X 2'-0" DOWELS 6" INTO (E) CONCRETE WALL WITH " SET-XP" EXPOXY AROUND PERIMETER OF (N) OPENING.

ACCESSORY SCHEDULE
NO. EQUIP. MANUFACTURE COLOR/MODEL NO.
1 Bobrick B-221 Classic Series Surface Mounted Seat Cover Dispenser
Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc. B-221
2 Bobrick B-2888 Classic Series Surface Mounted Multi-roll Toilet Tissue Dispenser
Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc. B-2888
3 Bobrick B-5837.99 Two-Wall Wheelchair Toilet Compartment Peened Grab Bar
Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc. B-5837.99
4 Bobrick Mirror with Stainless Steel Channel Frame and Shelf Bobrick B-166 1824 5 Bobrick B-4112 Contura Series Surface Mounted Soap
Dispenser
Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc. B-4112
6 Bobrick B-3942 Classic Series Semi-Recessed Convertible Combination Towel and Waste Unit
Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc. B-3942

PLUMBING FIXTURE SCHEDULE

MARK TYPE DESCRIPTION CW HW W V
AP-1 ACCESS
PANEL

JL INDUSTRIES TMS WITH SCREW DRIVER - OPERATED STEEL CAM CLOSING MECHANISM.

DF-1 DRINKING

FOUNTAIN
ELKAY BI-LEVEL WATER COOLER - EZSTL8LC - VERSATILE
FD-1 FLOOR DRAIN J.R. SMITH FIG. 2115-A FLOOR DRAIN WITH DUCO CAST BODY, ROUND, HEEL

PROOF ADJUSTABLE STAINER GRATE WITH COMMON FRONT AND BACK DOUBLE DRAINAGE FLANGE, WEEP HOLES, 2" HUBLESS; FURNISH WITH TRAP PRIMER CONNECTION.
0' - 2" 0' - 1 1/2"
LAV-1 LAVATORY AMERICAN STANDARD WHEEL CHAIR USER WALL MOUNTED SINK WHTIE VITREOUS CHINA MODEL # 9141.011 OR EQUAL
LF-1 LAVATORY
FAUCET

AMERICAN STANDARD MONTERREY SINGLE CONTROL CENTERSET FAUCET-BASE MODEL-1.5 GPM; MODEL # 6114.110.002 OR EQUAL.
0' - 0 3/4" 0' - 2" 0' - 1 1/2"
TP-1 TRAP PRIMER PPP PRESSURE TYPE PRIMER WITH TRIM FOR MULTIPLE RUNOUTS 0' - 0 1/2" UR-1 URINAL AMERICAN STANDARD WASHBROOK FLOWISE 6590.001 ULTRA HIGH EFFICIENCY WHITE VITREOUS CHINA URINAL SYSTEM; 0.125GPF EXPOSED TOP SPUD URINAL & ULTIMA MANUAL URINAL FLUSH VALVE 6045013.002
0' - 0 3/4" 0' - 2" 0' - 1 1/2"
UR-2 URINAL AMERICAN STANDARD WASHBROOK FLOWISE 6590.001 (ADA) ULTRA HIGH EFFICIENCY WHITE VITREOUS CHINA URINAL SYSTEM; 0.125GPF EXPOSED TOP SPUD URINAL & ULTIMA MANUAL URINAL FLUSH VALVE 6045013.002 0' - 0 3/4" 0' - 2" 0' - 1 1/2"
WC-1 WATER
CLOSET
AMERICAN STANDARD MADERA MODEL 3461.528, ENLOGATED BOWL FLOOR MOUNTED WHITE VITRIOUS CHINA WATER CLOSET. 1.28 GPF WITH SELECTRONIC FLUSH VALVE AND ENLOGATED BOWL. OPEN FRONT SEAT FOR ACCESSIBLE INSTALLATION. OLSONITE SEAT #10 CT W/ OPEN FRONT.
0' - 1 1/2" 0' - 3" 0' - 2"
WC-2 WATER
CLOSET
AMERICAN STANDARD MADERA BARRIER FREE (ADA) MODEL 3461.528, ENLOGATED BOWL FLOOR MOUNTED WHITE VITRIOUS CHINA WATER CLOSET.

1.28 GPF WITH SELECTRONIC FLUSH VALVE AND ENLOGATED BOWL. OPEN FRONT SEAT FOR ACCESSIBLE INSTALLATION. OLSONITE SEAT #10 CT W/ OPEN FRONT.
0' - 1 1/2" 0' - 3" 0' - 2"
WHA-1 WATER
HAMMER

ARRESTOR
PPP #SWA-1000

FINISH MATERIAL NOTES

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR BIDDING ONLY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D

5.J.e
Packet Pg. 757 Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2) Level 1
0'- 0"
Level 2
9'- 9"
Level 3
19'- 5"
BASEMENT -10' - 0"
AREA
(NOT IN SCOPE)
AREA
(NOT IN SCOPE) AREA
(NOT IN SCOPE)
25 25
26 28 29
30 30

WORKSHOP
117
LOBBY
119
OFFICE
111

HALLWAY
108

CLASSROOM
124
(FINISHED TO BE DONE BY TENANT)
27 RB-1
P-1 P-1

STORAGE
15 HALLWAY
19B

CLASSROOM
14 P-1 P-1
RB-1 RB-1
11 11
P-2
78 P-2 P-2
EXISTING WALLS TO REMAIN. PATCH AND REPAIR

TO MATCH EXISTING FINISHES WHERE DAMAGED
BY DEMOLITION.

WALLS / ITEMS TO BE DEMOLISHED
NEW 2x WOOD STUDS AT 16" O.C. WITH FINISHES
PER MATERIAL SCHEDULE.

NEW 8X8X16 CMU WALL
Edward
Lok Ng
C-16840
REN.11/30/23

L ICENSED
A

RCHITECT
STAT E
OF
CA
L

I FORN IA
Client:

Consultant:

CAD Draft:

Architect:

Engineer:

Job Number:

Date Issue:

Client:

G:\Project Files\2971 Santa Monica 2800 AA Bldg Remodel\01-Drawings\01-Revit\3-CD\2971 Santa Monica 2800 AA Bldg Remodel.rvt3/23/2023 5:19:16 PM 2800 AIRPORT AVENUE
SANTA MONICA CALIFORNIA 90405
A4.1 JSJSLNSANTA MONICA 3/15/23
2971
SANTA MONICA 2800 AA BLDG

REMODEL
90% SUBMITTAL

SECTION
VC
1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
Section 1

RENOVATION KEYNOTES
11 NEW HOLLOW METAL DOOR AND HOLLOW METAL FRAME.
25 EXISTING WINDOW TO REMAIN. PROTECT IN PLACE.
26 EXISTING ROOFING TO REMAIN. PROTECT IN PLACE.
27 NEW R-30 CEILING INSULATION. CEILING FINISH TO BE DONE BY TENANT. 28 EXISTING STRUCTURAL BEAM TO REMAIN. PROTECT IN PLACE. 29 EXISTING CEILING JOISTS TO REMAIN. PROTECT IN PLACE. 30 EXISTING DOOR TO REMAIN. PROTECT IN PLACE.
78 NEW WALL INFILL TO MATCH EXISTING, BY FILLING WITH CONCRETE AND #4 REBARS @12" O.C. EACH WAY AT CENTER OF WALL. PROVIDE #4 X 2'-0" DOWELS 6" INTO (E) CONCRETE WALL WITH " SET-XP" EXPOXY AROUND PERIMETER OF (N) OPENING.

WALL LEGEND
NO. REVISION DATE ISSUED
P-2

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR BIDDING ONLY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D

5.J.e
Packet Pg. 758 Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2) Level 1
0'- 0"
Level 2
9'- 9"
22 P-3
P-3
P-3
64 64 64 64
64 64 64
33 33
79 79 79 79 79
79 79
79 79
93 93 93 93
94 Level 1
0'- 0"
Level 2
9'- 9"
Level 3
19'- 5"
22 22
P-3
P-3
P-3
79 11 79 P-2
11 78 94
Level 1
0'- 0"
Level 2
9'- 9"
Level 3
19'- 5"
22 P-3
P-3 P-3
P-3
P-3
33 23
64 64 64 P-2 79 79 79
93 P-3
Level 1
0'- 0"
Level 2
9'- 9"
Level 3
19'- 5"
22 22
P-3 33 23 33
P-3 P-3 P-3
P-3
P-2 P-3 P-2
P-2
22 P-2
P-3
P-3

1. UNLESS SPECIFICALLY INDICATED OTHERWISE, PRODUCTS

BE SUBMITTED FOR OWNER REPRESENTATIVE'S REVIEW AND
APPROVAL. CONTRACTOR MAY REQUEST APPROVAL FROM OWNER

TO USE OR SUBSTITUTE ENVIRONMENTALLY PREFERABLE PRODUCTS AND RECYCLED PRODUCTS.

2. COLORS AND FINISHES SHALL MATCH SAMPLES AVAILABLE FOR VIEW

BY CONTRACTOR AT OWNER REPRESENTATIVE'S PROJECT SITE
OFFICE. ARCHITECT IS SOLE JUDGE OF COLOR AND FINISH MATCH.

3. WHERE "MATCH EXISTING" IS INDICATED, PROVIDE NEW MATERIAL AS NECESSARY TO PATCH OR EXTEND EXISTING MATERIAL. UNLESS AN

EXCEPTION IS SPECIFICALLY NOTED, NEW MATERIAL SHALL MATCH

EXISTING IN TYPE, MATERIAL, SIZE, THICKNESS, COLOR, AND PATTERN.

4. WHERE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS REQUIRE COLOR MATCH, BUT

Edward
Lok Ng
C-16840
REN.11/30/23

L ICENSED
A

RCHITECT
STAT E
OF
CA
L

I FORN IA
Client:

Consultant:

CAD Draft:

Architect:

Engineer:

Job Number:

Date Issue:

Client:

G:\Project Files\2971 Santa Monica 2800 AA Bldg Remodel\01-Drawings\01-Revit\3-CD\2971 Santa Monica 2800 AA Bldg Remodel.rvt3/23/2023 5:19:19 PM 2800 AIRPORT AVENUE
SANTA MONICA CALIFORNIA 90405
A4.2 JSJSLNSANTA MONICA 3/15/23 2971 SANTA MONICA 2800 AA BLDG REMODEL 90% SUBMITTAL

EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS VC
NO. REVISION DATE ISSUED
1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"

EXTERIOR ELEVATION - NORTH
2 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"

EXTERIOR ELEVATION - EAST
3 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"

EXTERIOR ELEVATION - SOUTH
4 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"

EXTERIOR ELEVATION - WEST

RENOVATION KEYNOTES
11 NEW HOLLOW METAL DOOR AND HOLLOW METAL FRAME.
22 NEW WALL-MOUNTED LED LIGHT FIXTURE.
23 NEW CONCRETE LANDINGS AND STAIRS. REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE AND LANDSCAPING.
33 NEW ADA COMPLIANT HANDRAIL.
64 NEW WINDOW UNIT HEAT PUMP. SEE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS.
78 NEW WALL INFILL TO MATCH EXISTING, BY FILLING WITH CONCRETE AND #4 REBARS @12" O.C. EACH WAY AT CENTER OF WALL. PROVIDE #4 X 2'-0" DOWELS 6" INTO (E) CONCRETE WALL WITH " SET-XP" EXPOXY AROUND PERIMETER OF (N) OPENING. 79 REMOVE EXISTING HEATING UNIT, PROVIDE NEW WALL INFILL TO MATCH EXISTING. 93 REMOVE EXISTING FLUTE VENT. PROVIDE NEW WALL INFILL TO MATCH EXISTING. 94 REMOVE EXISTING WALL EXHAUST. PROVIDE NEW WALL INFILL TO MATCH EXISTING.

FINISH MATERIAL NOTES

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR BIDDING ONLY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D

5.J.e
Packet Pg. 759 Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2)

GRAB BAR
12" MIN. 24" MIN.
54" MIN.

GRAB BAR
24" MIN.
17" -18"
CL
60" MIN. CLEAR
M
A
N
E
U
V
E
RIN
G
S
P
A
C
E
60" MIN.
2% MAX. IN ANY

DIRECTION

STEEL SIGN WITH

PORCELAIN ENAMEL FINISH
(12" X 18" MIN., WHITE ON BLUE)
"VAN ACCESSIBLE" PLATE (12" X 16"

WHITE ON BLUE) STEEL SIGN WITH
PORCELAIN ENAMEL FINISH. MIN. 1"

HIGH LETTERING ONLY INSTALLED

WHEN HATCHED ACCESS AREA IS AT
LEAST 8' WIDE (LOCATED AT THE

INTERIOR SIDE OF THE ACCESSIBLE
STALL)

FINISH GRADE

CONCRETE FOOTING
12" SQ. X 2'-6" DEEP

MINIMUM FINE
$250
MIN.
3"
6'-8" MIN.

OR ROUND
12" SQ.

PARKING
ONLY
VAN

ACCESSIBLE
"MINIMUM FINE $250" PLATE (12" X 19"

WHITE ON BLUE) STEEL SIGN WITH
PORCELAIN ENAMEL FINISH. MIN. 1"

HIGH LETTERING
2'-6"
3" X 3" GLAV. STEEL TUBE

CENTERLINE POST W/ CENTERLINE

OF STALL

FINISH GRADE
2'-6"
A5.0
14 TRUNCATED
DOME
P.O.T.

PLAN
EA. WAY

2.3-2.4

0.18 - 0.22 HT.

RECESSED MOUNTED

SECTION/PLAN
(ALIGN EDGE OF

DETECTABLE SURFACE

FLUSH WITH ADJACENT
PAVING)MAX. 1/2" THK.

0.9 - 0.92 BASE

0.45 - 0.47 TOP
ALIGN

SECTION
NOTE:

DETECTABLE WARNING OF CLEARLY CONTRASTING COLOR
(COLOR: YELLOW, APPROXIMATE FS 33538 OF FEDERAL STANDARD 595C.)

TRUNCATED
DOME
P.O.T.

SECTION/PLAN
(ALIGN EDGE OF

DETECTABLE SURFACE

FLUSH WITH ADJACENT

PAVING)
ALIGN
NOTE:

DETECTABLE WARNING OF CLEARLY CONTRASTING COLOR
(COLOR: YELLOW, APPROXIMATE FS 33538 OF FEDERAL STANDARD 595C.)

FINISH SURFACE

ARROW POINTING IN

DIRECTION OF ACCESSIBLE
FEATURE. TYP.

NOTE: LETTERS AND

NUMERALS ARE RAISED
1/32" & ARE ACCOMPANIED
BY GRADE 2 BRAILLE.

CHARACTERS ARE
MINIMUM 5/8" HIGH AND A
MAXIMUM OF 2" HIGH.

ATTACH WITH 3M VHB
TAPE.
5' - 0"
12"

STRIKE SIDE OF
DOOR
EXIT
MOUNTING HEIGHT:

SIGNS WITH RAISED

CHARACTER AND BRAILLE
SHALL BE LOCATED 48

INCHES MINIMUM ABOVE

THE FINISH FLOOR OR

GROUND SURFACE,

MEASURED FROM THE

BASELINE OF THE LOWEST
LINE OF BRAILLE AND 60

INCHES MAXIMUM ABOVE

THE FINISH FLOOR OR

GROUND SURFACE,

MEASURED FROM THE

BASELINE OF THE

HIGHEST LINE OF RAISED
CHARACTERS.
3/8" MIN. -
1/2" MAX.

T
Y
P.
1/2" MIN.

CONTRACTED

CALIFORNIA
GRADE 2

BRAILLE

SUBMIT SHOP

DRAWINGS PRIOR

TO FABRICATION
5" X 5" SIGN, 1/8"

THICK NON-GLARE
ACRYLIC W/ 1/32"

RAISED TEXT AND
COPY. HELVETICA
65 MEDIUM TEXT &

FIELD COLOR TO BE

COORDINATED WITH
CITY. 1/4" ROUND

CORNERS
8" 8"
3/8" W/ EXPANSION JOINT

SEALANT W/ ROUNDED
BACKUP

PREMOULDED
FILLER
NOTE:

LOCATE E.J. @ 20'-0"
O.C. MAX. LOCATE PER

SITE PLAN
#4 @ 24" O.C.

A EXPANSION JOINT

B CONTROL JOINT
NOTE:

LOCATE C.J. @ 5'-0"
O.C. MAX. LOCATION PER

SITE PLAN
1/4" X 1" DEEP SAWCUT

OR TOOLED JOINT
AT CMU WALL:
3-#16 x 2 1/2" LONG

EXPANSION ANCHORS TO

WALL STRUCTURE OR AS

PROVIDED BY

ANUFACTURER
WALL

LOCATE GRAB BARS ON EACH SIDE, OR ONE SIDE AND THE BACK, OF THE WATER CLOSET, 33 INCHES ABOVE AND PARALLEL TO THE FLOOR. GRAB BARS AT THE SIDE ARE TO BE AT LEAST 42 INCHES LONG WITH THE FRONT END POSITIONED 24 INCHES IN FRONT OF THE WATER CLOSET. GRAB BARS AT THE BACK CAN NOT BE LESS THAN 36 INCHES LONG. THE DIAMETER OR WIDTH OF THE GRIPPING SURFACE IS REQUIRED TO BE 1 1/2" O.D., OR THE SHAPE IS TO PROVIDE AN EQUIVALENT GRIPPING SURFACE.

IF GRAB BARS ARE MOUNTED ADJACENT TO A WALL, THE SPACE BETWEEN THE WALL AND THE GRAB BARS IS TO BE 1 1/2 INCHES. GRAB BARS ARE TO RESIST 250 POUNDS OF DOWNWARD FORCE AND TORSION. GRAB BARS ARE TO BE MADE OF STAINLESS STEEL WITH A PINED SURFACE AND SNAP FLANGES OVER MOUNTING BOLTS.

AT STUD WALL:

USE MANUFACTURER'S

MOUNTING HARDWARE FOR

ATTACHMENT TO WALL
STRUCTURE. PROVIDE 1/8" MIN.

STEEL PLATE AS BACKING

PROVIDE
MIN. 2x12

SOLID BLK'G

AT WOOD

STUD WALLS

OR STEEL
PLATE

TOILET SEAT COVER DISPENSER(HIGHEST OPERABLE PART)

PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER(HIGHEST OPERABLE PART)

SANITARY NAPKIN DISPOSAL(HIGHEST OPERABLE PART)SOAP DISPENSER(HIGHEST OPERABLE PART)

MIRROR ABOVE LAVATORY(TOP AND BOTTOM EDGEOF REFLECTIVE SURFACE) FINISH
FLOOR
A.F.F.
40" MAX.
17" MIN. DEPTH
1' - 6"
34" MAX.

ADA-COMPLYING HAND WASHING

FAUCET AT WALL-HUNG LAVATORY

PROVIDE

PIPE INSULATION

FINISH FLOOR

LAVATORY
29" MIN.

KNEE CLR.
8"
TOE CLR.
6" MAX.

MIN.
9"
27" CLEAR KNEE SPACE
3' - 0"
3' - 0"
2" WIDE WHITE STRIPING -
2 COATS, TYP.

BLUE BACKGROUND -
2 COATS TYP.
1 1/2" WIDE WHITE STRIPING
WHEELCHAIR SYMBOL - 2
COATS TYP.

ALIGN AT END OF 90
DEG. STALL (ALIGN 2' FROM

END OF DIAGONAL STALL)
T
Y
P.
2"
4" DIA.

93.00°

78.00°
6"
4"
4"
7 3/4"
3"
2" WIDE WHITE STRIPING -
2 COATS, TYP.

BLUE BACKGROUND -
2 COATS TYP.
1 1/2" WIDE WHITE STRIPING
WHEELCHAIR SYMBOL - 2
COATS TYP.

ALIGN AT END OF 90
DEG. STALL (ALIGN 2' FROM

END OF DIAGONAL STALL)
4" DIA.
1/4" MIN. THICKNESS TYPICAL AND IN

CONTRASTING COLORS OF THE
DOOR. (TYPICAL) THE GENDER

WORD IS LOCATED DIRECTLY

UNDER PICTOGRAM
NOTE: LETTERS AND NUMERALS ARE
RAISED 1/32" AND ARE ACCOMPANIED BY
GRADE 2 BRAILLE. CHARACTERS ARE
MINIMUM 5/8" HIGH AND A MAXIMUM OF
2" HIGH. ATTACH WITH 4 STAINLESS
STEEL SCREWS.

H
EIG
H
T
N
O
T
E

SEE MOUNTING
MOUNTING HEIGHT:

SIGNS WITH RAISED CHARACTER AND
BRAILLE SHALL BE LOCATED 48 INCHES

MINIMUM ABOVE THE FINISH FLOOR OR

GROUND SURFACE, MEASURED FROM
THE

BASELINE OF THE LOWEST LINE OF
BRAILLE AND 60 INCHES MAXIMUM ABOVE

THE FINISH FLOOR OR GROUND

SURFACE, MEASURED FROM THE

BASELINE OF THE HIGHEST LINE OF
RAISED CHARACTERS.

CONTRACTED CALIFORNIA GRADE 2

BRAILLE

LATCH SIDE

OF DOOR
8"x6" SQ.

WOMEN
5" TYP.
3/8" MIN. -
1/2" MAX.

T
Y
P.
1/2" MIN.
8"x6" SQ.

MEN
5' - 0"
NOTE: LETTERS AND NUMERALS ARE
RAISED 1/32". CHARACTERS ARE
MINIMUM 5/8" HIGH AND A MAXIMUM OF
2" HIGH. ATTACH WITH 4 STAINLESS
STEEL SCREWS.
12" DIAMETER CIRCLE 1/4" THICK AND 12" EQUILATERAL TRIANGLE 1/4" THICK. THE WORD "RESTROOM" IS LOCATED DIRECTLY UNDER PICTOGRAM. COLOR OF TRIANGLE SHALL CONTRAST VISUALLY WITH THE COLOR OF THE CIRCLE. COLOR OF CIRCLE SHALL CONTRAST VISUALLY WITH THE DOOR COLOR.
1/8" MIN. RADIUS

AT CORNERS

TYPICAL AT LATCH SIDE

OF ENTRANCE DOOR

EASED EDGES
FINISH: ALL RESTROOM SIGNS SHALL
HAVE A NON-GLARE FINISH.

EQ. EQ.

RESTROOM RESTROOM
A5.0
7 3" SQ. GALVANIZED STEEL TUBE

REFLECTORIZED ACCESSIBLE SIGN
2 LOCK WASHERS
1/2" DIAMETER CARRIAGE BOLT
W/ NUT
FOR CONCRETE: SPRAY-APPLY 2 COATS

OF CONTRASTING EPOXY PAINT WITH
SILICA GRANULES TO PROVIDE ADACOMPLYING SLIP RESITATNCE.

FOR BRICK OR TILE: SPRAY-APPLY 2

COATS OF CONTRASTING ACRYLIC

ENAMMEL PAINT WITH SILICA GRANULES

TO PROVIDE ADA- COMPLYING SLIP

RESITNATCE
FOR VCT: PROVIDE 3M "SAFETY-WALK"

SLIP RESISTNAT FGNERAL PRPOSE
TAPE-600 SERIES OR EQUAL
1"
MAX.
2"

WARNING STRIPING

OF CLEARLY

CONTRASTING
COLOR
CONC.
30° MAX.

STEP
1/2" MAXIMUM

RADIOUS
6' - 0"
6" 6"
2- 1" DIA.

HOLES
MIN. 1" HIGH LETTERING

STEEL SIGN WITH

PORCELAIN ENAMEL FINISH
(17" X 22" MIN., WHITE ON BLUE)

VERIFY TELEPHONE INFORMATION

PRIOR TO SIGN CONSTRUCTION
3" X 3" GLAV.

STEEL TUBE

FINISH GRADE

CONCRETE FOOTING
12" SQ. X 2'-6" DEEP

UNAUTHORIZED

VEHICLES PARKED IN

DESIGNATED

ACCESSIBLE SPACES

NOT DISPLAYING

DISTINGUISHING

PLACARDS OR SPECIAL

LICENSE PLATES

ISSUED FOR PERSONS

WITH DISABILITIES

SHALL BE TOWED

AWAY AT OWNER'S
EXPENSE. TOWED

VEHICLES MAY BE

RECLAIMED

AT -----------------------

OR BY TELEPHONING
TELEPHONE No:
(_ _ _) _ _ _ - _ _ _ _
MIN.
3"
6'-8" MIN.

TYP. 2'-6"

FLOOR LINE
13 1/2" MINIMUM

TOP OF CONTROL
FLUSH CONTROL 17" MAXIMUM
44" MAXIMUM
17" - 19"
36" LONG S.S. GRAB BAR AT BACK OF WALL
FINISH FLR.

TOILET
PAPER

DISPENSER

TO HAVE

CONTINUOUS

PAPER FLOW
CBC
TOILET 11B-604.7
54" MIN.
7" MIN. TO 9" MAX.
36" MAXIMUM
33" MIN. AFF. TOP OF GRAB BAR
1 1/2"
MIN.

CLR.

GRAB BAR
19" MIN.

AND BELOW
24" MIN.

A5.0
5 TOILET SEAT
42" MIN. LONG S.S. GRAB BAR AT SIDE WALL
6" MIN. 3" MIN.

TUBE SLEEVE
2" STD.

THICKEN CONC.

WALKWAY WHERE
OCCURS
SET POST IN "EPOXY"
GROUT. CENTER RAIL
WITHIN HOLE.

FINISH SURFACE

WHERE OCCURS

FILL GAP W/

EPOXY GROUT
NEW 1 -1/2" O.D.

GALVANIZE STEEL TUBE
6"
4"
OVER
2" COMPACTED SAND BASE
VISQUEEN W.P
MEMBRANE 6 MIL. MIN.

FOR INTERIOR SLAB
#4 @ 16" O.C. EACH WAY
LEVEL
12"
36"
1 1/4" MAX.
1/2" RADIUS
MAX.

LEVEL
12"
1 1/2" O.D. GALVANIZED TUBE STEEL
WITH .120" WALL THICKNESS
NOTE:

GRIND SMOOTH

ALL WELDS
3" RADIUS
30 MAX.
3" RADIUS
TREAD + 12"
A5.0
22 A5.0
22 1' - 6"
TREAD TYP.
1' - 0"
A5.0
21 TYP.

LEVEL
12"
37"
1 1/4" MAX.
1/2" RADIUS
MAX.

LEVEL
12"
1 1/2" O.D. GALVANIVED TUBE STEEL
WITH .120" WALL THICKNESS
NOTE:

GRIND SMOOTH

ALL WELDS
3"
RADIUS
3" RADIUS
A5.0 TREAD + 12"
22 A5.0
22 SEE STRUCTURAL FOR

FURTHER INFO
1' - 6"
1' - 0"
A5.0
21 TYP.
3" RAD.
6" HIGH

CONCRETE

GUIDE CURB
1-1/2" O.D. GALVANIZE TUBE STEEL WITH

0.120" WALL THICKNESS AT TOP RAIL
INTERMEDIATE 1-1/2" O.D.

ROUND SUPPORT @ 6'-0"
O.C. MAX. WHERE
OCCURS
3" RAD.

TOP
OF

INCLINE
TOP OF

INCLINE
TYP.
0' - 6"
3' - 0"
15".
0' - 6" 15".

NOTE:

SEE PLAN

FOR RAIL AND

POST FINISH
A5.0
26 "HI"
FINISH
FLOOR

ABOVE FINISH FLOOR
36" MAXIMUM

CHILLED

DRINKING

FOUNTAINS
5" MAX. 15" MIN.

ABOVE FINISH FLOOR
38" MINIMUM TO 43" MAXIMUM

FACE OF WALL
"LOW"
48" CLEARANCE FOR DOUBLE
NOTE: PROVIDE 4" HIGH

MINIMUM FLOW OF
WATER.

DEEP
18" MINIMUM

CLEAR KNEE SPACE
27" MIN.

NEW 1-1/2" O.D. GALVINIZE

STEEL TUBE AT HANDRAILS

SET POST IN STEEL PIPE

SLEEVE & FILL WITH EPOXY
4 @ TOP

SCARIFY PORTION OF

RAIL IN CONTACT WITH
EPOXY

NEW CONCRETE CURB

CONCRETE RAMP

WHERE OCCURS

GALVANIZED (ASTM
A123) POST SLEEVE
2-1/4" DIA. STD.

STRENGTH STEEL
PIPE (ASTM A53.

GRADE B)
MIN.
0' - 3"
1-1/2" O.D. POST)
(3" DIAMETER COREDRILL FOR
0' - 6"
MAX.

CL
1/4" TYP.
1' - 0"
12"
18"
4"
4" CONCRETE SLAB
W/ #4 @ 12" O.C. EA.

WAY
2 #4 DOWEL
#4 REBAR TOP
& BOTTOM
2" AGGREGATE BASE
6"
NEW 1-1/2" DIA. GALVANIZE TUBE
STL. HANDRAIL W/.120"
THICKNESS, SET IN 2" DIA. DRILLED

HOLES W/ EPOXY
NEW 4" CONC. RAMP W/
#4 REBAR @ 16" O.C.E.W. 6" CURB
#4 REBAR TOP
& BOTTOM
2" AGGREGATE BASE
(90% COMPACTION)

COMPACT FILL
(90% COMPACTION)

EXISTING

PAVEMENT
EASE EDGES 1/2"
CHAMFER (TYP.)

RAIL POCKET FILLED WITH
EPOXY FOR SECURITY (TYP.)
(SEE PLAN)
VARIES

EXISTING PLANTER
1' - 0"
6" CURB
A5.0
26 4' - 0" MIN.

DETECTABLE WARNING

OF CLEARLY

CONTRASTING COLOR
(COLOR: YELLOW,
APPROXIMATE FS 33538 OF
FEDERAL STANDARD 595C.)
6" MIN. - 8" MAX. FROM

FACE OF CURB

FACE OF CURB FLUSH TRANSITION

BETWEEN RAMP

AND LANDING
X 4' - 0" X 8% MAX. SLOPE
8% MAX.

SLOPE
8% MAX.

SLOPE
3' - 0"
CURB FACE 6" OR LESS 7" 8" 9" 10" 11" 12"
X 6' 7' 8' 9' 10' 11' 12'

WALKWAY
NOTES:

CURB RAMP PER 2019 CBC SECTION
11B-406.

DETERMINED
BY CURB HT.

A5.0
19 Edward
Lok Ng
C-16840
REN.11/30/23

L ICENSED ARCHITECT
STAT E OF CA L I FORN IA Client: Consultant: CAD Draft: Architect: Engineer:

Job Number:

Date Issue:

Client:

G:\Project Files\2971 Santa Monica 2800 AA Bldg Remodel\01-Drawings\01-Revit\3-CD\2971 Santa Monica 2800 AA Bldg Remodel.rvt3/23/2023 5:19:22 PM 2800 AIRPORT AVENUE
SANTA MONICA CALIFORNIA 90405
A5.0 JSJSLNSANTA MONICA 3/15/23 2971 SANTA MONICA 2800 AA BLDG REMODEL 90% SUBMITTAL

ACCESSIBLE DETAILS VC
N
O. REVISIO
N
D
A
TE IS
S
UED
ACCS. R.R. STALL SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" 1
ADA PARKING SIGN SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" 15
DETECTABLE WARNINGSCALE: 1" = 1'-0" 19
DIRECTIONAL SIGN SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" 10
EXIT SIGN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 9
EXPANSION JOINT SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" 25 GRAB BAR SCALE: 6" = 1'-0" 5 MOUNTING HEIGHTS SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 6
ISA PARKING SIGN SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" 13 LAVATORY SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" 3 R.R. ROOM ID @ WALL SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 7
RESTROOM SIGN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 8
SIGN MOUNT SCALE: 3" = 1'-0" 14
STAIR STRIPING SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" 21
TIRE STOP STALL SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" 18
TOW-AWAY SIGN SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" 12
URINAL SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" 4
CORE DRILL SCALE: 3" = 1'-0" 22 WATER CLOSET SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" 2 CONCRETE SLAB SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" 20
HANDRAILS AT STAIRS SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" 17
STAIR SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" 16
RAMP HANDRAIL SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" 23
COREDRILL @ CURB SCALE: 3" = 1'-0" 26 DRINKING FOUNTAIN SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" 11 RAMP SECTION SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" 24
RAMP CROSS-SECTION SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" 27

CURB RAMP

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR BIDDING ONLY
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 30
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D

5.J.e
Packet Pg. 760 Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2) NEW 12x12 TILE

OVER MORTAR BED

NEW WOODEN STUDS
NEW 5/8" CEMENT BOARD

NEW TRACK FASTENERS
NEW 24x24 TILE OVER

CEMENT BOARD
NEW R-13 SOUND

INSULATION
0' - 2 1/2"

NEW CONCRETE
1% SLOPE MIN.
2% SLOPE MAX.

TO DRAIN

GLAZING

JAMB BEYOND

DOOR PER
SCHEDULE. WOOD
MAY OCCUR.

GASKET. TYP.

MAX.
10"
1/4"

NEW EXPANSION
JOINT

THRESHOLD-ALIGN

W/ JAMB
1/4" MAX
SLOPE
(E) GYP. BD. WALL
3 1/2"
(N) RUBBER BASE 4"
VINYL
(N) FLOORING AS

SCHEDULED

WATER-RESISTANT
GYP. BD. WALL

BULL NOSE
TILE/JOLLY AT TOP.

FLOORING AS

PER INTERIOR ELEVATION

SCHEDULED

TILE AS

SCHEDULED, THIN
SET OVER 5/8"

CEMENT BOARD

WATER-RESISTANT
GYP. BD. WALL

BULL NOSE
TILE/JOLLY AT TOP.

FLOORING AS

SCHEDULED

TILE AS

SCHEDULED, THIN
SET OVER 5/8"

CEMENT BOARD
4"
A B
2"
3"
T
Y
P
6"
12"
MIN.
6"
0' - 8"

NATIVE EARTHEN
GRADE
# 3@ 18" O.C. EA.

WAY,3" EDGE
DISTANCE T&B.

HOUSEKEEPING PAD
AS REQ'D. SEE
MECH. DWGS. FOR

LOCATION AND SIZE
MECH. UNIT PER
PLAN
3/4" CHAMFER

AT CORNERS

FASTEN TO PAD PER
6 FIELD - SUPPLIED

TIE DOWN - BOLTS
2" SAND
1" CROWN
3"
12"
2' - 0"
2" 3" 3"
TYP.
3"
3-#4 TIES @ 3" O.C. T&B
BALANCE OF #4 TIES @
8" O.C.

STEEL POST ( SEE

FENCE DETAIL FOR SIZE)
6 #6 VERT. EQUALLY
SPACED
12"
CLEAR
3"
#4 TIES, TYP.

STEEL POST #7 VERT., TYP. OF 4

SECTION
PLAN

SEE PLAN SEE PLAN
7' - 0"
4" SQ. JAMB / POST

OFFSET PULL

HANDLE ON BOTH

SIDES OF GATE WITH

MORTISE LOCK

GATE STRIKE

CHANNEL

FINISH GRADE
3'-0"
M
AX.
3"
A5.1
7 4"
8"
1' - 4"
6"
8'- 0"
18"
12"

CONCRETE FOOTING

CONCRETE CURB WITH
3/4" CHAMFER
#4 HORIZONTAL REBAR
AT 16" O.C. 2 AT TOP
8" CONCRETE BLOCK

WALL GROUTED

INTERIOR OF WALL

SHALL BE CLEAR OF

ANY OBSTRUCTIONS
#4 VERT. RE-BAR FULL

HEIGHT OF WALL AT
16" O.C.

MAINTAIN CONSTANT

ELEVATION AT TOP OF
BLOCK WALL.

CEMENT MORTAR CAP

CRUSHED

MISCELLANEOUS BASE
90% COMPACTION
#4 CONSTINUOUS

HORIZONTAL REBAR

CRUSHED

MISCELLANEOUS BASE
90% COMPACTION

CONCRETE BLOCK

WALL GROUTED
SLOPE DOWN AT 1/8" PER FOOT

WALK/ ALLEY
5°

45.00°
GROUTED 8" CONC. BLOCK WALL

STEEL ANGLE WITH REBAR

EMBEDDED IN GROUT ( FULL HEIGHT

OF BLOCK WALL)
#4 RE-BAR, 5" LONG, AT 16" O.C. FULL

PENERTRATION WELD TO ANGLE AT
45 DEGREE ANGLE TO EACH LEG.
3"X3"X1/4" GALVANIZED METAL

ANGLE FULL HEIGHT OF WALL
16" TIP
MAX
10' - 0"
8' - 0"
MIN.

VARIES
8'- 0" MIN.
10' - 0"
SLOPE ROOF @2% MIN.

SOLID ROOF STRUCTURE /

CANOPY TO MEET UBC AND

PANNING REQUIREMENTS

STEEL METAL COLUMN TUBING

AND EMBEDMENT PER UBC

REQUIRMENTS AND BUILDING

AND SAFTEY
RECOMMENDATIONS. ( KEEP
COLUMN CLEAR OF ANGLE REBAR EMBEDMENT)

CONCRETE BLOCK WALL WITH

SOILD GROUTED CELLS
GATE REQUIRED. MOTORIZED

ROLL-UP DOOR
A5.1
11 8' - 0" 2' - 0"
MAX
10' - 0"

PROVIDE

SEALANT,
TYP.

EXISTING

CONCRETE WALL

NEW HOLLOW

METAL FRAME

AT CMU CONDITIONS NEW HOLLOW METAL DOOR
0' - 2"

ANCHOR BOLT PER

MANUFACTURE

RECOMMENDATION
8"
(E) CONCRETE WALL

NEW HOLLOW

METAL FRAME

HM STOP

NEW HOLLOW

METAL DOOR

PROVIDE SHIM

AND SEALANT,
TYP.

NEW GROUT

ANCHOR BOLT PER

MANUFACTURE

RECOMMENDATION

JAMB BEYOND

DOOR PER
SCHEDULE.

KICKPLATE
10"
1/4"

NEW EXPANSION
JOINT

THRESHOLD-ALIGN

W/ JAMB
1/4" MAX
SLOPE
NEW 1-1/2" DIA.

GALVANIZE TUBE STL.

GUARDRAILING W/.120"
THICKNESS, SET IN 2"
DIA. DRILLED HOLES W/
EPOXY
EASE EDGES 1/2"
CHAMFER (TYP.)

RAIL POCKET FILLED

WITH EPOXY FOR
SECURITY (TYP.)
A5.0
26 #4 BARS AT 16" O.C.

EACH WAY
3"
2"
PROVIDE 90%

COMPACTION AT

EXISTING NATIVE

SUBGRADE

THICKEN EDGE ALL
SIDES. (TYP.)
NOTE: CRACK CONTROL JOINTS TO BE LOCATED WITH A MAXIMUM OF 8' SPACING OR AS DETERMINED BY CITY INSPECTOR IN BOTH DIRECTIONS. EXPANSION JOINTS TO BE LOCATED AT ALL SLAB OR BUILDING INTERFACE LOCATIONS.

CONCRETE SLAB

EXPANSION MATERIAL
1' - 0"
3' - 6"
10"
6"

EXISTING

RETAINING WALL
SIM
Edward
Lok Ng
C-16840
REN.11/30/23

L ICENSED ARCHITECT
STAT E OF CA L I FORN IA Client: Consultant: CAD Draft: Architect: Engineer:

Job Number:

Date Issue:

Client:

G:\Project Files\2971 Santa Monica 2800 AA Bldg Remodel\01-Drawings\01-Revit\3-CD\2971 Santa Monica 2800 AA Bldg Remodel.rvt3/23/2023 5:19:24 PM 2800 AIRPORT AVENUE
SANTA MONICA CALIFORNIA 90405
A5.1 JSJSLNSANTA MONICA 3/15/23
2971
SANTA MONICA 2800 AA BLDG

REMODEL
90% SUBMITTAL

DETAILS
VC
N
O. REVISIO
N
D
A
TE IS
S
UED
TILE AT WALL & FLOOR 3" = 1'-0" 1
THRESHOLD - ENTRY 3" = 1'-0" 2
BASE 6" = 1'-0" 4
BASE/WAINSCOT - TILE 3" = 1'-0" 5
HOUSEKEEPING PAD 1" = 1'-0" 13
FENCE CONC. FOOTING 1 1/2" = 1'-0" 7
GATE ELEVATION 3/8" = 1'-0" 8
SECTION B 1" = 1'-0" 15 SECTION C 1" = 1'-0" 12
TRASH ENCLOSURE - NORTH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 21 DETAIL D 1 1/2" = 1'-0" 11 TRASH ENCLOSURE - EAST SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 22
JAMB TO CONCRETE 3" = 1'-0" 10
HEAD TO CONCRETE 3" = 1'-0" 9
THRESHOLD - ENTRY 2 3" = 1'-0" 3

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR BIDDING ONLY
GUARDRAIL AT RETAIN.
1 1/2" = 1'-0" 6
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D

5.J.e
Packet Pg. 761 Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2)

CLASSROOM
102

CLASSROOM
104

CLASSROOM
101

CLASSROOM
103
OFFICE
107
MECH. ROOM
109

HALLWAY
106

CLASSROOM
124

CLASSROOM
123
OFFICE
111

ELECTRICAL
ROOM
118

HALLWAY
116A

HALLWAY
116B
MEN'S

RESTROOM
127

WORKSHOP
117

DRESSING ROOM
115

HALLWAY
110
FOYER
100

HALLWAY
108

WOMEN'S

RESTROOM
126
LOBBY
119

HALLWAY
112
STAIRS
26 STAIRS
27 (N) 4X6 WOOD POST W/
HDU2 SEE DETAIL
PROVIDE 3'-0" SQ. X 1'-0"
PAD WITH 6- #4

REINFORCING EACH WAY
UNDER
(E) WALL FOOTING
(E) SLAB ON
GRADE CONC.
(E) SLAB ON
GRADE CONC.
(E) SLAB ON
GRADE CONC.
(E) SLAB ON
GRADE CONC.
(E) SLAB ON
GRADE CONC.
(E) SLAB ON
GRADE CONC.
(E) FTG.
1' - 6"
(E) FTG.
1' - 2"
(E) FTG.
1' - 6"
(E) FTG.
1' - 2"
(E) FTG.
1' - 4"
(E) FTG.
1' - 0"
(E) FTG.
3' - 0"
(E) FTG.
4' - 8"
(E) FTG.
3' - 0"
(E) FTG.
4' - 8"
(E) FTG.
3' - 0"
(E) FTG.
4' - 8"
(E) FTG.
4' - 8"
(E) FTG.
3' - 1"
(E) FTG.
4' - 8"
(E) FTG.
3' - 1"
(E) FTG.
4' - 8"
(E) FTG.
3' - 1"
(E) FTG.
1' - 2"
(E) FTG.
1' - 2"
(E) FTG.
1' - 4"
(E) FTG.
1' - 2"
(E) FTG.
1' - 2"
(E) FTG.
1' - 4"
E( ) FTG.
1' - 4"
(E) FTG.
1' - 4" (E) FTG.
1' - 4"
(E) FTG.
1' - 4"
(E) FTG.
2' - 0"
(E) FTG.
2' - 0"
(E) FTG.
1' - 2"
(E) FTG.
1' - 2"
(E) FTG.
1' - 4"
(E) FTG.
1' - 4"
(E) FTG.
1' - 4"
(E) FTG.
2' - 0"
(E) FTG.
1' - 4"
(E) FTG.
1' - 4"
(E) FTG.
1' - 4"
(E) FTG.
1' - 4"
(E) FTG.
1' - 4"
(E) FTG.
1' - 4"
(N) ROOF

BEAM ABOVE

FOOTINGS AT BASTMENT LEVEL

FOOTINGS AT GRADE
SD1.0
16 SD1.0
16 (N) 4X6 WOOD POST W/
HDU2 SEE DETAIL
PROVIDE 3'-0" SQ. X 1'-0"
PAD WITH 6- #4

REINFORCING EACH WAY
UNDER
(E) WALL FOOTING
3' - 0"
TYP.

WALL FTG.
(E) 12"
SD1.0
19 SD1.0
19 SD1.0
15 Edward
Lok Ng
C-16840
REN.11/30/23

L ICENSED
A

RCHITECT
STAT E
OF
CA
L

I FORN IA
Client:

Consultant:

CAD Draft:

Architect:

Engineer:

Job Number:

Date Issue:

Client:

G:\Project Files\2971 Santa Monica 2800 AA Bldg Remodel\01-Drawings\01-Revit\3-CD\2971 Santa Monica 2800 AA Bldg Remodel.rvt3/23/2023 5:19:25 PM 2800 AIRPORT AVENUE
SANTA MONICA CALIFORNIA 90405
S1.0 JSJSLNSANTA MONICA 3/15/23 2971 SANTA MONICA 2800 AA BLDG REMODEL 90% SUBMITTAL

STRUCTURAL

FOUNDATION PLAN VC
NO. REVISION DATE ISSUED
1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"

STRUCTURAL FOUNDATION PLAN
N

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR BIDDING ONLY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D

5.J.e
Packet Pg. 762 Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2)

CLASSROOM
102

CLASSROOM
104

CLASSROOM
101

CLASSROOM
103
OFFICE
107
MECH. ROOM
109

HALLWAY
106

CLASSROOM
124

CLASSROOM
123
OFFICE
111

ELECTRICAL
ROOM
118

HALLWAY
116A

HALLWAY
116B
MEN'S

RESTROOM
127

WORKSHOP
117

DRESSING ROOM
115

HALLWAY
110
FOYER
100

HALLWAY
108

WOMEN'S

RESTROOM
126
LOBBY
119

HALLWAY
112
STAIRS
26 STAIRS
27 (N) 4X6 WOOD POST
(N) 4X6
WOOD
POST
(E) 2x12 R.J.
@ 24" O.C.

EXPOSED

CEILING
(E) 2x12 R.J.
@ 24" O.C.
(E) 2x12 R.J.
@ 24" O.C.
(E) 7" X 29' 4" LAMINATED GIRDER(E) 7" X 29' 4" LAMINATED GIRDER(E) 7" X 29' 4" LAMINATED GIRDER (E) 2x12 R.J.
@ 24" O.C.
(E) 2x6 R.J.
@ 24" O.C.
(E) 2x6 R.J.
@ 24" O.C.
(E) 2x12 R.J.@ 24" O.C.
(E) 2x12 R.J.@ 24" O.C.

CONCRETE SLAB AND CONCRETE BEAM
(E) 8" X10'4'

CONCRETE BEAM
2-#4 BOTT.
(E) 2x12 R.J.
@ 24" O.C.
(E) 2x12 R.J.@ 24" O.C. (E) 2x12 R.J.
@ 24" O.C.
(E) 2x12 R.J.
@ 24" O.C.

CONCRETE SLAB AND CONCRETE BEAM
(E) 2x12 R.J.@ 24" O.C.(E) 2-3X12(E) 2x12 R.J.@ 24" O.C. (E) 2x12 R.J.@ 24" O.C.

CONCRETE SLAB AND CONCRETE BEAM
(E) 2x12 R.J.@ 24" O.C.
(N) 51/4" X 11 1/4" ROOF
BEAM PARALLAM 2.0 E W.S
PSL
12' - 0" 16' - 0" 5' - 0"
15' - 4"
SD1.0
17 SD1.0
17 SD1.0
18 Edward
Lok Ng
C-16840
REN.11/30/23

L ICENSED
A

RCHITECT
STAT E
OF
CA
L

I FORN IA
Client:

Consultant:

CAD Draft:

Architect:

Engineer:

Job Number:

Date Issue:

Client:

G:\Project Files\2971 Santa Monica 2800 AA Bldg Remodel\01-Drawings\01-Revit\3-CD\2971 Santa Monica 2800 AA Bldg Remodel.rvt3/23/2023 5:19:26 PM 2800 AIRPORT AVENUE
SANTA MONICA CALIFORNIA 90405
S2.0 JSJSLNSANTA MONICA 3/15/23 2971 SANTA MONICA 2800 AA BLDG REMODEL 90% SUBMITTAL

STRUCTURAL ROOF

FRAMING PLAN VC
NO. REVISION DATE ISSUED
1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"

STRUCTURAL ROOF FRAMING PLAN
N

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR BIDDING ONLY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D

5.J.e
Packet Pg. 763 Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2)

1. ALL LUMBER SHALL BE NO. 2 GRADE MARKED DOUGLAS FIR LARCH FOR VERTICAL MEMBERS, HORIZONTAL MEMBERS AND STUDS, AND NO. 1

DOUGLAS FIR FOR BEAMS
AND HEADERS INCLUDING 4 X POSTS OR LARGER.

2. PLYWOOD SHALL CONFORM TO U.S. PRODUCT STANDARDS PS-I DOUGLAS FIR NO. 1 OR "CDX" WHEN NOTED ON DRAWINGS AND SHALL BE INSPECTED BEFORE BEING COVERED.

3. WOOD SILLS SHALL BE PRESSURE-TREATED DOUGLAS FIR, U.N.O. WHEN THEY ARE IN CONTACT WITH CONCRETE OR MASONRY WITHIN 48" OF THE GROUND.

4. GALVANIZED NAILS SHALL BE USED FOR EXTERIOR WOOD. ALL NAILS SHALL

BE COMMON WIRE OR GALVANIZED BOX FOR SHEAR WALLS AND
DIAPHRAGMS.

5. ALL FINISH WOOD, EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR, SHALL BE NAILED WITH FINISH NAILS AND COUNTERSUNK.

6. DO NOT CUT STRUCTURAL MEMBERS FOR PIPES, ETC., UNLESS SPECIFICALLY DETAILED OR STATED IN THE CODE.

7. FIRE STOPS: PROVIDE BLOCKING AT ALL INTERSECTIONS OF STUD WALLS TO FLOOR, STAIRS, CEILING, ROOF, AND FURRED SPACES.

8. ALL LUMBER SHALL BE DOUGLAS FIR LARCH TYPE.

9. PROVIDE STANDARD PLATE WASHERS FOR BOLTS BEAR ON WOOD. U.N.O.

10. JOISTS AND RAFTERS SHALL BE BLOCKED WITH 2 X @ 8'-0" O.C. MAX.

11. DOUBLE FLOOR JOISTS WHERE THEY ARE PARALLEL TO PARTITIONS.

1. CONCRETE SHALL BE 2,500 PSI AT 28 DAYS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.

2. CONCRETE: 1 PART CEMENT, 2 1/2 PARTS SAND, AND 3 1/2 PARTS 3/4" DIA.

ROCK. TOTAL WATER SHALL NOT EXCEED 7 GALLONS PER SACK OF CEMENT.

3. GROUT: 1 PART CEMENT, 3 PARTS SAND, 2 PARTS 3/8" DIA. MAXIMUM PEA GRAVEL OR APPROVED EQUAL.

4. CEMENT SHALL BE TYPE V PORTLAND "S" PER ASTM C-150.

1. REINFORCED STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A615, GRADE 40 FOR SIZES #3 AND #4 GRADE 60 FOR SIZES #5 AND LARGER.

2. WELDED FABRIC (MESH) SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST REVISED ASTM A185. SMOOTH WIRE FABRIC SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A85 YIELD STRENGTH 60 KSI

3. ALL BARS IN MASONRY SHALL BE LAPPED A MINIMUM OF 40 BAR DIAMETERS (2'-0" MIN.) AT ALL SPLICES UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.

4. ALL BARS I N CONCRETE SHALL BE LAPPED A NIMINUM OF 36 BAR DIAMETERS (2'-0" MIN.) AT ALL SPLICES UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.

5. SPLICES OF HORIZONTAL REBAR IN WALLS AND FOOTINGS SHALL BE STAGGERED 4'-0" MINIMUM. ALL BENDING OF REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST EDITION OF CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE.

1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS

PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK, REPORTING ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE DESIGNER.

2. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL HAVE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS ON THE DRAWINGS.

3. THE DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE DESIGNER.

4. ALL WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST EDITION OF CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE.

5. WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE:

CONTRACTOR AND SUB-CONTRACTOR SHALL PURCHASE AND MAINTAIN,

COMPLETE COVERAGE TO PROTECT THE CLAIMS UNDER WORKERS
COMPENSATION ACTS, AND SHOW PROOF THEREOF.

6. UTILITY SERVICES: CONTRACTORS AND SUB-CONTRACTORS SHALL CONFIRM

LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES AND NOTIFY ALL PERSONS WORKING ON SITE OF EXISTING UTILITIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND IDENTIFY ACTIVE

UTILITY SERVICES AND TEMPORARY DE-ACTIVATE THEM WHEN THEY CONSTITUTE A HAZARD. LOCATION OF GAS, ELECTRIC AND WATER METERS TO CONFORM WITH UTILITY COMPANY REQUIREMENTS.

7. PROTECT EXISTING CONSTRUCTION FINISHES, ADJACENT PROPERTY, PLANTING AND TREES. PROTECT THE WORK FROM RAIN AND OTHER NATURAL ELEMENTS. REPAIR, REFINISH, OR REPLACE ANY ITEMS DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION.

8. TEMPORARY ELECTRIC AND WATER SERVICES FURNISHED AND PAID FOR BY THE CONTRACTOR.

9. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TEMPORARY TOILET IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL ORDINANCES IF NO EXISTING TOILET AVAILABLE ON SITE.

10. CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE

RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF

CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT HIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL

DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE DESIGNER

HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN

CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK ON THIS PROJECT,

EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE DESIGNER.

1. JOIST TO SOIL OR GIRDER, TOE NAIL---------------------------------------------------------3-8d

2. BRIDGING TO JOIST, TOE NAIL EACH END---------------------------------------------------2-8d

3. 1" X 6" SUBFLOOR OR LESS TO EACH JOIST, FACENAIL--------------------------------2-8d

4. WIDER THAN 1" X 6" SUBFLOOR TO EACH JOIST, FACE NAIL-----------------------3-8d

5. 2" SUBFLOOR TO JOIST OR GIRDER, BLIND AND FACE NAIL-----------------------2-16d

6. SOLE PLATE TO JOIST OR BLOCKING, FACE NAIL-------------------------- 16d @ 16" 0.C.

7. TOP PLATE TO STUD, END NAIL--------------------------------------------------------------2-16d

8. STUD TO SOLE PLATE-----------------------------------4-8d, TOENAIL OR 2-16d, END NAIL

9. DOUBLE STUDS, FACE NAIL---------------------------------------------------------16d @ 24" O.C.

10. DOUBLE TOP PLATES, FACE NAIL------------------------------------------------16d @16" O.C.

11. TOP PLATES, LAPS AND INTERSECTIONS, FACE NAIL------------------------------2-16d

12. CONTINUOUS HEADER, TWO PIECES---------- 16d @ 16" O.C. ALONG EACH EDGE

13. CEILING JOISTS TO PLATE, TOE NAIL---------------------------------------------------------3-8d

14. CONTINUOUS HEADER TO STUD, TOE NAIL-------------------------------------------------4-8d

15. CEILING JOISTS, LAPS OVER PARTITIONS, FACE NAIL-------------------------------3-16d

16. CEILING JOISTS TO PARALLEL RAFTERS, FACE NAIL--------------------------------3-16d

17. RAFTER TO PLATE, TOE NAIL-------------------------------------------------------------------3-8d

18. 1" BRACE TO EACH STUD AND PLATE, FACE NAIL--------------------------------------2-8d

19. 1" x 8" SHEATHING TO EACH BEARING, FACE NAIL-------------------------------------2-8d

20. WIDER THAN 1" X 8" SHEATHING TO EACH BEARING, FACE NAIL------------------3-8d

21. BUILT-UP CORNER STUDS---------------------------------------------------------16d @ 24" O.C.

22. DOUBLE TOP PLATES, LAP SPLICE--------------------------------------------------------8-16d

23. BLOCKING BETWEEN JOISTS OR RAFTERS TO TOP PLATES, TOE NAIL--3-8d

24. BUILT-UP GIRDER AND BEAMS---------- 20d @ 32" O.C. @ TOP AND BOTTOM AND STAGGERED 2-20d AT ENDS AND AT EACH SPLICE.

25. RIM JOIST TO TOP PLATE, TOE NAIL---------------------------------------------8d @ 6" O.C.

BORED HOLES - MAXIMUM SIZE HOLE.
40% OF WIDTH
2 x 4 - 1.4" (1 3/8") DIA. HOLE
2 x 6 - 2.2" (2 3/16") DIA. HOLE

BORED HOLES IN DOUBLE STUDS - MAXIMUM
SIZE HOLE IN DOUBLE STUDS - 60% OF WIDTH

NO MORE THAN TWO ADJOINING DOUBLE
STUDS TO BE BORED.
2 x 4 - 2.1" (2 1/8") DIA. HOLE
2 x 6 - 3.3" ( 3 5/16") DIA. HOLE
NOTCHES - MAXIMUM DEPTH 25% OF WIDTH
2 x 4 - .87" (7/8") DEEP NOTCH
2 x 6 - 1.37" (1 3/8") DEEP NOTCH
*
* 5/8" MIN.

EDGE

DISTANCE
STUD

EXTERIOR WALLS AND BEARING WALLS
BORED HOLES - MAXIMUM SIZE HOLE.
60% IF WIDTH
2 x 4 - 2.1" (2 1/8") DIA. HOLE
2 x 6 - 3.3" (3 5/16") DIA. HOLE.

NOTCHES - MAXIMUM DEPTH.
40% IF WIDTH
2 x 4 - 1.4" (1 3/8") DEEP NOTCH
2 x 6 - 2.2" (2 3/16") DEEP NOTCH
* PORTION OF STUD REMAINING AT NOTCHES

OR HOLES SHALL BE SOUND WOOD WITHOUT

EXCESSIVE STRENGTH-REDUCING

PROPERTIES SUCH AS KNOTS, BREAKS, SPUTS
EXCESSIVE SLOPE OF GRAIN. ETC.

STUD
* 5/8" MIN.

EDGE

DISTANCE
*
WIDTH
NOTCHES WITHIN 1/3 SPAN EACH END

THIRD OF SPAN BUT BORED HOLES ARE PERMITTED

NOTCHES NOT PERMITTED WITHIN MIDDLE

BORED HOLES ALSO PERMITTED
2 x SOLID BLOCKING
(EXCEPT WHERE ENDS OF JOISTS

ARE NAILED TO A HEADER, BAND

OR RIM JOIST OR TO ANY ADJOINING
STUD)
NOTCH AT ENDD/4MAX.D/6MAX.D/3MAX.2" MIN.

JOISTS DEPTH "D"

FLOOR JOIST
D/6MAX.

D/3MAX.
2" MIN.

EA. END
2 -2x TOP PLATES
(MAY BE OMITTED IF WALL HAS

PLYWOOD)
1x6 LET-IN BRACE @ 25' +/- & ENDS 3-8d
EA. END TO PLATE 2-8d TO EA. STUD
LINTEL
DOOR

TRIMMER
FLOOR
LINE
LINTEL

TRIMMER
2 x SILL
SPLICE
3-20d
TYP.
16d @
12" O.C.

WINDOW
2x STUDS
@ 16" O.C.
6-16d
TYP. SPLICE
4'-0" MIN. LAP
"A34" F.A." TYP. AT

EXTERIOR

OPENINGS EXCEPT

WHERE HOLDOWN
OCCURS

BOTTOM PLATE

LINTEL SIZE SCHEDULE
4" STUDS 6"
STUDS

MAX ALLOW SPANS TRIMMER
4x4
4x6
4x8
4x10
4x12
4x6
6x6
6x8
6x10
6x12
4'-0"
6'-0"
8'-0"
10'-0"
12'-0"

UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR DETAILED
2x MIN.
2x MIN.
3x MIN.
3x MIN.
4x MIN.

NEW 5/8" GYP. BD.

NEW 2x4 PLATE
CONT. PRESSURE
TREATED W/ 1/4" DIA X 3"
SHOT PIN @ 32" O.C. TYP.
(ITW-RAMSET 1524 SDB)
NEW 2x4 STUDS
@ 16" O.C.

CONCRETE FLOOR
(N) SIMPSON CLIP
"STC" @ 4'-0" O.C.

VERTICAL

SLOTTED HOLES
(N) 3-16d EA. END
(E) C.J.
(N) 2x BLOCKING
AT 4'-0" O.C.
(N) 2-2x PLATES
(N) STUDS @ 16" O.C.
(N) FINISH

CEILING JOISTS
PERPEN. TO WALL
(E) C.J. @ 16" O.C.
(N) "STC" CLIP
@ 4'-0" O.C.
1" GAP
1" GAP
NOTE: LOCATE NAILS AT TOP OF SLOTTED HOLES OF CLIP "STC" 2x CONT. PLATE

PRESSURE TREATED
OR CALIF. REDWOOD

0.145" DIA. x 3" SHOT PINS
@ 4'-0" O.C. MAX.

ITW-RAMSET "1500" (I.C.C.
#ESR-1799) OR EQ.
5/8" +/- GYP. BD. CEMENT

BACKER BD & TILE
EXISTING 2x CLG.

JOIST @ 16" O.C.

NEW 2"x CONTINOUS

BLOCKING
DOUBLE 2x TOP PLATE

NEW CEILING
2x4 @ 16" O.C. WOOD
STUDS.
(2x6 WHERE NOTED)
6" THICK CONCRETE
2ND FLOOR SLAB
Edward
Lok Ng
C-16840
REN.11/30/23

L ICENSED
A

RCHITECT
STAT E
OF
CA
L

I FORN IA
Client:

Consultant:

CAD Draft:

Architect:

Engineer:

Job Number:

Date Issue:

Client:

G:\Project Files\2971 Santa Monica 2800 AA Bldg Remodel\01-Drawings\01-Revit\3-CD\2971 Santa Monica 2800 AA Bldg Remodel.rvt3/23/2023 5:19:28 PM 2800 AIRPORT AVENUE
SANTA MONICA CALIFORNIA 90405
SD1.0 LAJSLOK SANTA MONICA 3/15/23 2971 SANTA MONICA 2800 AA BLDG REMODEL 90% SUBMITTAL

TYPICAL DETAILS AND

GENERAL NOTESVC

CARPENTRY

CONCRETE

GENERAL REINFORCED STEEL

NAILING SCHEDULE
1" = 1'-0"
7 EXT. BEARING WALL
1" = 1'-0"
8 INT. NON BEARING
1" = 1'-0"
9 CUTTING, NOTCHING AND BORING
FRAMING DETAIL SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" 10
NON-STRUCTURAL WALLSCALE:1 1/2" = 1'-0" 12
NON BEARING WALL SCALE:1 1/2" = 1'-0" 11
TYPICAL STUD WALL SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" 13
DETAIL 14 SCALE: N.T.S. 14
DETAIL 15 SCALE: N.T.S. 15
NO. REVISION DATE ISSUED
TYP. POST CONNECTION SCALE: N.T.S. 17
HOLDOWN TO EX. FTG. SCALE: N.T.S. 16
DETAIL 18 SCALE: N.T.S. 18
DETAIL 19 SCALE: N.T.S. 19

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR BIDDING ONLY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D

5.J.e
Packet Pg. 764 Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2)

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR BIDDING ONLY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D 5.J.e Packet Pg. 765
Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2)

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR BIDDING ONLY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D 5.J.e Packet Pg. 766
Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2)

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR BIDDING ONLY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D 5.J.e Packet Pg. 767
Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2)

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR BIDDING ONLY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D 5.J.e Packet Pg. 768
Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2)

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR BIDDING ONLY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D 5.J.e Packet Pg. 769
Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2)

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR BIDDING ONLY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D 5.J.e Packet Pg. 770
Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2)

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR BIDDING ONLY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D 5.J.e Packet Pg. 771
Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2)

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR BIDDING ONLY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D 5.J.e Packet Pg. 772
Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2)

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR BIDDING ONLY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D 5.J.e Packet Pg. 773
Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2)

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR BIDDING ONLY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D 5.J.e Packet Pg. 774
Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2)

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR BIDDING ONLY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D 5.J.e Packet Pg. 775
Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2)

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR BIDDING ONLY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D 5.J.e Packet Pg. 776
Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2)

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR BIDDING ONLY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D 5.J.e Packet Pg. 777
Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2)

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR BIDDING ONLY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D 5.J.e Packet Pg. 778
Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2)

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR BIDDING ONLY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D 5.J.e Packet Pg. 779
Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2)

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR BIDDING ONLY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D 5.J.e Packet Pg. 780
Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2)

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR BIDDING ONLY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D 5.J.e Packet Pg. 781
Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2)

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR BIDDING ONLY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D 5.J.e Packet Pg. 782
Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2)

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR BIDDING ONLY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D 5.J.e Packet Pg. 783
Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2)

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR BIDDING ONLY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D 5.J.e Packet Pg. 784
Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2)

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR BIDDING ONLY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D 5.J.e Packet Pg. 785
Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2)

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR BIDDING ONLY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D 5.J.e Packet Pg. 786
Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2)

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR BIDDING ONLY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D 5.J.e Packet Pg. 787
Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2)

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR BIDDING ONLY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D 5.J.e Packet Pg. 788
Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2)

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR BIDDING ONLY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D 5.J.e Packet Pg. 789
Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2)

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR BIDDING ONLY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D 5.J.e Packet Pg. 790
Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2)

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION- FOR BIDDING ONLY
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D 5.J.e Packet Pg. 791
Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2) Exhibit
5 Payment and Performance Bonds
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D

5.J.e
Packet Pg. 792 Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2) DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D

5.J.e
Packet Pg. 793 Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2) DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D

5.J.e
Packet Pg. 794 Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2) DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D

5.J.e
Packet Pg. 795 Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2) DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D

5.J.e
Packet Pg. 796 Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2) DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D

5.J.e
Packet Pg. 797 Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2) DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D

5.J.e
Packet Pg. 798 Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2) DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D

5.J.e
Packet Pg. 799 Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2) DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D

5.J.e
Packet Pg. 800 Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2) DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D

5.J.e
Packet Pg. 801 Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2) DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D

5.J.e
Packet Pg. 802 Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2) Exhibit
6 Insurance Requirements
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D

5.J.e
Packet Pg. 803 Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2) 1 Construction Contract Insurance Requirements
Contractor shall procure and maintain insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property that may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, its agents, representatives, employees, or subcontractors.

I. Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

1. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an “occurrence” basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal and advertising injury, with limits of no less than $3,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (Insurance Services Office Form CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

2. Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Form CA 00 01 covering Code 1 (any auto), or if Contractor has no owned autos, Code 8 (hired) and Code 9 (nonowned), with limits of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

3. Workers’ Compensation: Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits and Employers’ Liability Insurance with limits of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.

Contractors providing services such as excavation, grading, and/or drilling or that involve environmental hazards will also possess:

4. Contractors’ Pollution Legal Liability. Insurance covering pollution conditions arising out of the actions performed by or on behalf of the Contractor with limits of no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence or claims/$2,000,000 policy aggregate.

If the Contractor maintains broader coverage or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City of Santa Monica requires and shall be entitled to any broader coverage or higher limits maintained by the Contractor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City of Santa Monica.

II. Other Insurance Provisions
The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D

5.J.e
Packet Pg. 804 Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2) 2 1. Additional Insured Status: The City of Santa Monica, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of Contractor including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. CGL coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Contractor’s insurance at least as broad as the combination of Insurance Services Office Forms: (1) CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38 and (2) CG 20 37.

2. Primary Coverage: For any claims related to this Agreement, the Contractor’s insurance shall be primary coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Form CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City of Santa Monica, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City of Santa Monica, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be in excess of the Contractor’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

3. Notice of Cancellation: Each insurance policy required herein shall state that coverage shall not be cancelled except after notice has been given to the City of Santa Monica.

4. Waiver of Subrogation: Contractor hereby grants to the City of Santa Monica a waiver of any right of subrogation which any insurer of said Contractor may acquire against the City of Santa Monica by virtue of payment of any loss. Contractor agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City of Santa Monica has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.

The Workers’ Compensation policy shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City of Santa Monica for all work performed by the Contractor, its employees, agents and subcontractors.

III. Self-Insured Retentions
Self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City of Santa Monica.

The City of Santa Monica may require the Contractor to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide satisfactory proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self-insured retention may be satisfied by either the name insured or the City of Santa Monica.

IV. Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in California with a current A.M. Best rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City of Santa Monica.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D

5.J.e
Packet Pg. 805 Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2) 3 V. Claims Made Policies
If the policy provides “claims made” coverage:

1. The Retroactive Date must be shown and must be before the date of this Agreement or the start of work.

2. The insurance must be maintained, and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least 5 years after completion of work.

3. If the policy is cancelled or not renewed, and not replaced with another “claims made” policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the effective Agreement date, the Contractor must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of 5 years after completion of work.

VI. Verification of Coverage
Contractor shall furnish the City of Santa Monica with original certificates and amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage provided by this clause) and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsement Page of the CGL policy listing all policy endorsements. These documents must be received and approved by the City of Santa Monica before work commences. However, failure to obtain required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Contractor’s obligation to provide them. The City of Santa Monica reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including the endorsements required herein, at any time.

VII. Failure to Maintain Insurance Coverage
If Contractor, for any reason, fails to maintain insurance coverage which is required pursuant to this Agreement, the same shall be deemed a material breach of contract.

The City of Santa Monica, at its sole option, may terminate this Agreement and obtain damages from the Contractor resulting from said breach.

VIII. Subcontractors
Contractor shall require and verify that all Subcontractors maintain insurance meeting the minimum requirements stated below:

1. All Subcontractors are required to possess insurance meeting the minimum scope and limits identified below:
a. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an “occurrence” basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal and advertising injury, DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D

5.J.e
Packet Pg. 806 Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2) 4 with limits of no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (Insurance Services Office Form CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. b. Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Form CA 00 01 covering Code 1 (any auto), or if the Subcontractor has no owned autos, Code 8 (hired) and Code 9 (non-owned), with limits of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
c. Workers’ Compensation: Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits and Employers’ Liability Insurance with limits of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.

Subcontractors providing services such as excavation, grading, and/or drilling or that involve environmental hazards will also possess:
d. Contractors’ Pollution Liability: Insurance covering pollution conditions arising out of actions performed by or on behalf of the Subcontractor, with limits no less than $1,000,000 each claim/$2,000,000 in the annual aggregate.

If the Subcontractor maintains broader coverage or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City of Santa Monica requires and shall be entitled to any broader coverage or higher limits maintained by the Subcontractor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City of Santa Monica.

2. All Subcontractors are required to comply with the insurance provisions established in Sections II through IV above.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D

5.J.e
Packet Pg. 807 Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2) 5 Effective 4/20/18
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D

5.J.e
Packet Pg. 808 Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2) Exhibit
7 Oaks Initiative Disclosure
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D

5.J.e
Packet Pg. 809 Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2) DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D

5.J.e
Packet Pg. 810 Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2) Exhibit
8 Living Wage Certification
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D

5.J.e
Packet Pg. 811 Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2) DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D

5.J.e
Packet Pg. 812 Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2) Exhibit
9 Prevailing Wage Acknowledgement Form
DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D

5.J.e
Packet Pg. 813 Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2) DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D

5.J.e
Packet Pg. 814 Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2) DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D

5.J.e
Packet Pg. 815 Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2) DocuSign Envelope ID: 16232FDB-2F04-4709-81BB-EDBD7E1E578D

5.J.e
Packet Pg. 816 Attachment: Executed contract for the 2800 Airport Avenue Reno (6508 : 2800 Airport Ave Renovation Construction Modification 2) City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: August 27, 2024
Agenda Item: 5.K
1 of 4
To: Mayor and City Council
From: David Martin, Director, Administration
Subject: Approval to Authorize City Manager to Execute and Negotiate Lease Agreements with Bergamot Station Arts Center Tenants
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt a finding of Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines and a finding no possibility of significant effect pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) of the CEQA Guidelines;

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute and negotiate a 41-month lease agreement with Social and Public Art Resource Center (SPARC) through 2027; and

3. Authorize the City Manager to execute and negotiate lease agreements with Bergamot Station Arts Center (Bergamot) tenants for up to 36 months (through 2027).

Summary
Staff recommends Council authorization for the City Manager to execute and negotiate lease agreements (Agreements) at Bergamot of up to 36 months or through 2027 in lieu of annual terms. The Agreements would support tenant investment and streamline lease renewals for long-term tenants in good standing.

Discussion
Bergamot is located at 2525 Michigan Avenue (Property) and is one of Santa Monica’s most prominent cultural arts assets and cultural hubs. The City purchased the Property in 1989 with Department of Transportation (DOT) funds and with the goal that the

5.K
Packet Pg. 817
2 of 4
Property could serve future transit needs, including providing a revenue source for DOT.

Around 1993, as an interim measure until future transit developments were realized, the City master-leased the Property to a developer and gallerist to curate and operate an arts center we know today as Bergamot.

In 2000, Council approved Bergamot Station Leasing Guidelines (Guidelines) to maintain and enhance the interim use of Bergamot in service and support of the Santa Monica arts community. In recognition of City investment, the then master lessee was offered a five-year term lease plus five one-year options. In turn, the master lessee(s) offered annual subleases to tenants to coincide with its one-year options.

The City assumed responsibilities of the overall ground lease in 2022 and direct administration of Agreements. The City maintained the one-year lease renewal structure for continuity and flexibility in anticipation of future redevelopment of the Property. In July 2024, Council authorized executing a contract with Rising Realty Partners for property management of Bergamot.

SPARC
In February 2024, SPARC executed a six-month lease agreement with the City at Bergamot Station Arts Center. SPARC has since requested to extend its lease through 2027 to meet a condition of grant funding.

SPARC received a grant from the State of California Natural Resource Agency (Grant) to replace, repair, and improve the Great Wall of Los Angeles Mural and Great Wall Interpretive Bridge (Great Wall). The Great Wall is a half-mile long mural depicting the history of California through images of significant figures and historic events from diverse and traditionally marginalized communities. An element of the Grant includes site control of rental space to support the Great Wall project. To meet the condition of the Grant, SPARC proposes extending its lease through 2027, or an extension of approximately 41 months.

5.K
Packet Pg. 818
3 of 4
The proposed extension would be in continued service and support to the arts community in Santa Monica, create synergy within Bergamot, and provide stability to one of the largest gallery spaces at Bergamot with rental revenue backed by the Grant.

Bergamot Lease Agreements
Agreements at Bergamot are offered annually, mirroring Guidelines, to Bergamot tenants in good standing. Tenants have expressed that one-year leases do not lend confidence to invest in their spaces; and City and property management staff experience an administrative burden to negotiate and execute nearly 30 Agreements annually.

The proposed modification would allow for negotiation and execution of Agreements of up to 36 months for tenants in good standing, provide confidence for tenant investment, and reallocate property management resources.

Redevelopment
Bergamot is identified as a priority development site for affordable housing in the City’s Housing Element. Staff will be presenting to Council at this meeting on the proposed timeline for implementation. The proposed extension of Agreements through 2027 would not interfere with the Property’s redevelopment timeline.

Past Council Actions
Meeting Date Description
12/05/2000 Council approved and authorized the City Manager to implement Bergamot Station Leasing Guidelines
Environmental Review
The Agreements are exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines. Section 15301 exempts Class 1 (Existing Facilities) projects from CEQA, which include the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or

5.K
Packet Pg. 819
4 of 4
topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use.

The Agreements provide for the leasing of the existing Bergamot Station and would not expand use of the Property. Therefore, the Agreements are exempt pursuant to Section 15301. Additionally, the Agreements are exempt from CEQA pursuant to the Common Sense Exemption of CEQA Guidelines, which states that CEQA does not apply “where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment.” The Agreements would lease City-owned real estate and would not result in adverse physical impacts on the environment, and as such, is exempt from CEQA.

Financial Impacts and Budget Actions
There is no immediate financial impact or budget action necessary as a result of the recommended actions. Staff will return to Council if specific budget actions are required in the future.

Prepared By: Ava Lee, Senior Development Analyst
Approved Forwarded to Council

5.K
Packet Pg. 820
City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: August 27, 2024
Agenda Item: 5.L
1 of 5
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Ramon Batista, Police Chief, Police Department
Subject: Approval of Purchase of Video Storage System for the Police Department's Closed-Circuit Television (CCTV) system.

Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council

1. Adopt a finding of no possibility of significant effect pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.

2. Authorize the Procurement Manager to issue a purchase order with Convergint Technologies LLC. for a video storage system for the Police Department. This recommended award is made as an exception to the competitive bidding process pursuant to Section 2.24.25(c) and is for the total amount not to exceed $762,045 (including a $69,277 contingency).

Summary
The City’s current video storage system for the Police Department’s closed-circuit television (CCTV) system was purchased in 2019 and is no longer compatible with the newer video management systems and higher resolution videos. Staff seeks City Council approval to authorize the Procurement Manager to issue a purchase order with Convergint Technologies LLC (Convergint) for a video storage system, which comes with five years of maintenance, in an amount not to exceed $762,045, which includes a 10% contingency.

Discussion
The City’s current video storage system archives video from over 825 cameras on Santa Monica City’s closed-circuit television (CCTV) system, which includes cameras

5.L
Packet Pg. 821
2 of 5
from the 3rd St. Promenade, the Pier, Big Blue Bus, parks, Santa Monica Public Library, Santa Monica Airport, traffic intersection cameras, and other City facilities such as City Hall, the Public Safety Facility (PSF), and parking structures.

The Video Management System (VMS) is the software and hardware system which allows video access for the user and sets the parameters regarding the storage of recorded video from cameras it manages. The current Santa Monica City VMS (Teledyne FLIR) is in the process of being replaced using Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC) Organized Retail Theft (ORT) Prevention grant funds as part of the Santa Monica Analytical Real Time (SMART) Center project.

The quality and number of CCTV cameras is increasing across the city, due to the SMART Center project and new cameras being acquired by the various departments across the City. These new, modern cameras require ever more storage capacity and processing capabilities. The coming modern VMS also requires a high-capacity, highperformance storage system for rapid and reliable recall of stored video.

The current Isilon video storage system was purchased in 2019, is beyond its service life, and is no longer able to support the City’s new VMS and the new camera network’s higher resolution videos and processing demands. Moreover, the current storage system and VMS have been fraught with repeated failures to capture video and retrieve video for important investigations.

The grant-funded purchase of the new VMS, coupled with the prospect of having to add video storage capacity to the aging and underperforming current storage system, prompted staff to seek options for replacing and modernizing the video storage system.

To procure this new video storage system, the initial plan was to use existing Information Services Department (ISD) vendor contracts through which the video storage unit and servers could be purchased. After the selection of Genetec as the City’s new VMS platform provider through the SMART Center grant project, Genetec informed the City that they could provide a video storage solution using Genetec’s proprietary video compression algorithms. This proprietary solution would reduce the amount of data storage required, as compared to the standard storage solutions being proposed through the ISD vendors. Police and ISD staff decided to use the Genetec solution as it was more cost effective when compared to other standard offerings. The new storage solution would be physically located on City property and managed locally

5.L
Packet Pg. 822
3 of 5
by ISD staff. Convergint offers competitive pricing for the purchase of the Genetec solution as a result of an existing contract with OMNIA, a governmental and private cooperative purchasing agency that serves state, local, and education entities as they acquire goods or services.

The upgraded video storage system would serve as a key tool to increase safety in Santa Monica by providing reliable and rapid video recall to support post-incident criminal investigations, real-time operations for the coming SMART Center, secure and safe facilities across the City, as well as efficient management of City operations such as traffic flow.
.

5.L
Packet Pg. 823
4 of 5
Vendor Selection
Exception to Competitive Bidding
Staff recommends Convergint Technologies LLC. to furnish and deliver a Video Storage system as an exception to competitive bidding per Muni Code 2.24.250 (c).

OMNIA is a governmental and private cooperative purchasing agency that serves state, local, and education entities. As a cooperative purchasing agency, they acquire goods or services by aggregating the demand of two or more entities in an effort to obtain more economical pricing. Staff would utilize OMNIA contract #R220702 that was established on April 1, 2022 and expires on March 31, 2025, with two additional one-year renewal options. The cooperative contract provides competitive leveraged pricing for Facility Technology Integration & Security System Services. c. competitive procedures were followed by a governmental agency, federal, state, county, city, joint powers agency, special district, or cooperative purchasing agency and the goods or services are supplied to the City at the same or better price;
Environmental Review
The purchase order for a new video storage system is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. The agreement is covered by the common sense exemption which states that CEQA does not apply, “where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment.” The purchase order will provide for a video storage system. Therefore, it can be seen with certainty that actions would not result in adverse physical impacts on the environment, and as such, is exempt from CEQA.

Financial Impacts and Budget Actions
Staff seeks authority to approve funding from the General Fund resulting from resources generated by Measure CS to award a purchase order with Convergint Technologies LLC. for a video storage system.

Purchase Order Request
FY 2024-25
Request Amount
Department Account # Total Contract
Amount
$762,045 01180003.550010.98979 $762,045

5.L
Packet Pg. 824
5 of 5
Prepared By: Jose Arroyo, Senior Administrative Analyst Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:

A. Convergint - OAKS INITIATIVE FORM
B. Convergint - Levine Act Disclosure Form

5.L
Packet Pg. 825

CITY OF SANTA MONICA

OAKS INITIATIVE NOTICE

NOTICE TO APPLICANTS, BIDDERS, PROPOSERS

AND OTHERS SEEKING DISCRETIONARY PERMITS, CONTRACTS,

OR OTHER BENEFITS FROM THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA
Santa Monica’s voters adopted a City Charter amendment commonly known as the Oaks Initiative. The Oaks Initiative requires the City to provide this notice and information about the Initiative’s requirements. You may obtain a full copy of the Initiative’s text from the City Clerk.

This information is required by City Charter Article XXII—Taxpayer Protection. It prohibits a public official from receiving, and a person or entity from conferring, specified personal benefits or campaign advantages from a person or entity after the official votes, or otherwise takes official action, to award a “public benefit” to that person or entity. The prohibition applies within and outside of the geographical boundaries of Santa Monica.

All persons or entities applying or receiving public benefits from the City of Santa Monica shall provide the names of trustees, directors, partners, and officers, and names of persons with more than a 10% equity, participation or revenue interest. An exception exists for persons serving in those capacities as volunteers, without compensation, for organizations exempt from income taxes under Section 501(c)(3), (4), or (6), of the Internal Revenue Code. However, this exception does not apply if the organization is a political committee or controls political committees. Examples of a “public benefit” include public contracts to provide goods or services worth more than $25,000 or a land use approval worth more than $25,000 over a 12-month period.

In order to facilitate compliance with the requirements of the Oaks Initiative, the City compiles and maintains certain information. That information includes the name of any person or persons who is seeking a “public benefit.” If the “public benefit” is sought by an entity, rather than an individual person, the information includes the name of every person who is: (a) trustee, (b) director, (c) partner, (d) officer, or has (e) more than a ten percent interest in the entity. Therefore, if you are seeking a “public benefit” covered by the Oaks Initiative, you must supply that information on the Oaks Initiative Disclosure Form. This information must be updated and supplied every 12 months.

Docusign Envelope ID: EE929671-C479-49FC-8780-88F353496812

5.L.a
Packet Pg. 826 Attachment: Convergint - OAKS INITIATIVE FORM (6511 : Purchase Video Storage System)

CITY OF SANTA MONICA

OAKS INITIATIVE DISCLOSURE FORM
In order to facilitate compliance with the requirements of the Oaks Initiative, the City compiles and maintains certain information. That information includes the name of any person or persons who is seeking a “public benefit.” If the “public benefit” is sought by an entity, rather than an individual person, the information includes the name of every person who is: (a) trustee, (b) director, (c) partner, (d) officer, or has (e) more than a ten percent interest in the entity.

Public benefits include:

1. Personal services contracts in excess of $25,000 over any 12-month period;

2. Sale of material, equipment or supplies to the City in excess of $25,000 over a 12- month period;

3. Purchase, sale or lease of real property to or from the City in excess of $25,000 over a 12- month period;

4. Non-competitive franchise awards with gross revenue of $50,000 or more in any 12-month period;

5. Land use variance, special use permit, or other exception to an established land use plan, where the decision has a value in excess of $25,000;

6. Tax “abatement, exception, or benefit” of a value in excess of $5,000 in any 12- month period; or

7. Payment of “cash or specie” of a net value to the recipient of $10,000 in any 12- month period.

Name(s) of persons or entities receiving public benefit:

Name(s) of trustees, directors, partners, and officers:

Name(s) of persons with more than a 10% equity, participation, or revenue interest:

Prepared by: ____________________________Title: __________________________ Signature: ______________________________________ Date: ________________ Email: ____________________________________ Phone: ____________________ FOR CITY USE ONLY:

Bid/PO/Contract # ____________________________ Permit # ___________________________ [email protected] 714-546-2780
Docusign Envelope ID: EE929671-C479-49FC-8780-88F353496812 7/25/2024
General Manager Bob Berkery

5.L.a
Packet Pg. 827 Attachment: Convergint - OAKS INITIATIVE FORM (6511 : Purchase Video Storage System) City of Santa Monica Levine Act Disclosure Form

CITY OF SANTA MONICA

CALIFORNIA LEVINE ACT DISCLOSURE
In 2022, California’s SB1439 extended requirements under Government Code Section 84308, also known as the "Levine Act", to prohibit City “Officers” from participating in any action related to a contract, license, permit, or entitlement if such Officer received campaign contributions totaling more than $250 within the previous twelve months, and for twelve months following the date of a final decision, from a party or participant to the proceeding, or their agent.

Section 84308(a)(4) of the Levine Act defines an "Officer" as follows: “Officer” means any elected or appointed officer of an agency, any alternate to an elected or appointed officer of an agency, and any candidate for elective office in an agency. The term “Officer” is further defined 2 Cal. Code Regs. Section 18438.1, which states:

An officer of an agency includes only those persons who make, participate in making, or in any way attempt to use their official position to influence a decision in the license, permit, or entitlement for use proceeding, or who exercise authority or budgetary control over the agency or officers who may do so, and:
(1) Serve in an elected position, including an official appointed to an elected position due to an interim vacancy or an election otherwise canceled because the official was the sole candidate for the position;
(2) Serve as a member of a board or commission;
(3) Serve as the chief executive of a state agency, or county, city or district of any kind; or
(4) Have decision making authority with respect to the proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use and is also a candidate for elected office or has been a candidate for elective office in the 12 months prior to the proceeding.

Have you, your company, or any agent on behalf of you or your company, made any political contributions of more than $250 to any City Officer in the twelve months preceding the date of the submission of your application or proposal? ____YES ____ NO
Name of Councilmember or City Officer: _________________________________ ✔
Docusign Envelope ID: EE929671-C479-49FC-8780-88F353496812

5.L.b
Packet Pg. 828 Attachment: Convergint - Levine Act Disclosure Form (6511 : Purchase Video Storage System) City of Santa Monica Levine Act Disclosure Form
Name of Contributor: _________________________________________________ Date(s) of Contribution(s): ____________________________________________ Amount(s) ________________________________________________________ Please specify below and/or add additional sheet(s) to identify additional Councilmembers or City Officers to whom you and/or your agents made campaign contributions.

Answering YES does not preclude the City of Santa Monica from awarding a contract, license, permit, or entitlement or taking any subsequent action related to the item. It does, however, preclude the identified City Officer from participating in any actions related to such item.

By signing below, you certify you also agree to disclose to the City any future contributions made to Councilmembers or other City Officers by you or your agent(s) after the date of signing this disclosure form, and within 12 months following the approval, renewal, or extension of the requested contract, license, permit, or entitlement.

I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.

Signed: ____________________________ Date: ____________________ Print Name: _________________________ Title: _____________________ Company: __________________________
Additional Disclosures:

Please note this form is a public record and subject to a California Public Records Act request.

Bob Berkery General Manager Convergint Technologies LLC Docusign Envelope ID: EE929671-C479-49FC-8780-88F353496812 7/25/2024

5.L.b
Packet Pg. 829 Attachment: Convergint - Levine Act Disclosure Form (6511 : Purchase Video Storage System) City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: August 27, 2024
Agenda Item: 5.M
1 of 6
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Rick Valte, Public Works Director, Public Works, Facilities Maintenance Subject: Approval of First Modifications to Agreements with Bayview Construction, Inc., Olympos Painting, Inc., and RAMCO General Engineering Contractors, Inc. for As-Needed General Contractor Services

5.M
Packet Pg. 830
2 of 6
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that City Council:

1. Adopt a finding of Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15301 (Existing Facilities), of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines;

2. Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a first modification to agreement #11352 in an amount not to exceed $1,666,667 with Bayview Construction, Inc., for citywide as-needed general contracting services as required by Public Works. This will result in an additional amount not to exceed $666,667 for two years, and an additional amount not to exceed $1,000,000 for one additional three-year renewal option for a new total amount not to exceed $2,516,667 over a 5-year period with future year funding contingent on Council budget approval.

3. Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a first modification to agreement #11353 in an amount not to exceed $1,666,667 with Olympos Painting, Inc., for citywide as-needed general contracting services as required by Public Works. This will result in an additional amount not to exceed $666,667 for two years, and an additional amount not to exceed $1,000,000 for one additional three-year renewal option for a new total amount not to exceed $3,541,667 over a 5-year period with future year funding contingent on Council budget approval; and

4. Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a first modification to agreement #11354 in an amount not to exceed $1,666,667 with RAMCO General Engineering Contractors, Inc. (RAMCO Inc.) for citywide as-needed general contracting services as required by Public Works. This will result in an additional amount not to exceed $666,667 for two years, and an additional amount not to exceed $1,000,000 for one additional three-year renewal option for a new total amount not to exceed $3,916,667 over a 5-year period with future year funding contingent on Council budget approval.

Summary
The City of Santa Monica utilizes general contractor services to perform work that requires specialized equipment, contractor licensing, and technical expertise that cannot be provided by City staff. Staff solicits the services of a general contractor over 150 times per year to ensure effective and efficient maintenance of the City’s infrastructure.

These contracted services range from jobs that require immediate attention due to safety concerns, to large-scale repairs that require specific State Contractor Licenses and equipment certifications. Since the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) typically covers preventative maintenance to critical infrastructure, staff anticipates an increase in frequency of immediate attention and large-scale repairs due to fewer CIP projects being funded. Staff recommends the additional spending authority to replenish exhausted budget authority, allowing staff to continue to utilize the as-needed

5.M
Packet Pg. 831
3 of 6
contractors to make immediate repairs and address safety needs at City facilities for the public and staff in a timely fashion.

Discussion
The Facilities Maintenance Division of Public Works employs four in-house staff to provide carpentry services at City facilities. Such services include locksmith repairs, stucco patching, weather stripping, partition/door installations and the repair of various fixtures throughout the city. Public Works staff solicits the services of a general contractor over 150 times per year to respond to citywide general contractor requests and to assist with overall maintenance and upkeep of City-owned facilities. These services range from jobs that require immediate attention due to safety concerns such as window repairs, trip hazards, and roof leaks to large-scale projects such as wall framing, floor replacements, concrete repairs, playground equipment repairs, and office renovations. Staff also utilizes general contractor services for capital improvement projects when small maintenance scopes grow to include multiple construction activities and are incorporated into a larger scope of services. This increases the cost of the maintenance contract, therefore exhausting the maintenance budget authority at a faster rate.

The City has historically contracted out general contracting services. The “Contract and As-Needed Staffing Review Policy, Practice, Recommendations” report (Attachment A) approved on January 13, 2015, recommended that general contracting services be contracted due to equipment requirements, specialized expertise, and risk management.

On January 24, 2023, Council awarded Bid #4432 (Attachment B), as a split award and authorized the City Manager to negotiate and execute the following agreements:
• Agreement #11352 (Attachment C) to Bayview Construction, Inc., to provide general contractor services in an amount not to exceed $340,000 for two years, with an additional three-year renewal option in the amount of $510,000 for a total amount not to exceed $850,000 over a 5-year period.

5.M
Packet Pg. 832
4 of 6
• Agreement #11353 (Attachment D) to Olympos Painting Inc., to provide general contractor services in an amount not to exceed $750,000 for two years, with an additional three-year renewal option in the amount of $1,125,000 for a total amount not to exceed $1,875,000 over a 5-year period.
• Agreement #11354 (Attachment E) to RAMCO, Inc., to provide general contractor services in an amount not to exceed $900,000 for two years, with aon additional three-year renewal option in the amount of $1,350,000 for a total amount not to exceed $2,250,000 over a 5-year period.

In the past 16 months, there has been an increase in the need for general contracting services due to repair projects resulting from deferred maintenance. Many maintenance projects expanded to include unanticipated scope that is typically included in CIP projects. Staff keeps the original as needed contractor on the project until it is complete to limit responsibility for all construction activity associated with the project to one contractor.

To ensure adequate funding remains available for ongoing maintenance requests, future urgent repair work, as well as small capital projects, modifications for additional spending authority is recommended.

Environmental Review
The awards for general contractor services are categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15301. Section 15301 of the CEQA State Guidelines provides Class 1 (existing facilities) exemption for projects that consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, leasing, licensing, permitting, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of the existing or former use. The awards for the general contractor services would not result in any modifications to existing facilities. The existing facilities would be maintained and repaired with the general contractor services and the award of services would not

5.M
Packet Pg. 833
5 of 6
expand or materially change existing facilities or operations. Therefore, the award agreements are categorically exempt as set forth in Section 15301 of the CEQA State Guidelines.

Past Council Actions
Meeting Date Description
01/13/15 (Attachment A) Staff Report – As-Needed and Contract Staffing Review Report
01/24/23 (Attachment B) Staff Report – City Council authorization to award Bid #4432 to Bayview Construction, Inc., Olympos Painting
Inc., and RAMCO Inc. and execute Agreements 11352,
11353 and 11354 for general contractor services.

Financial Impacts and Budget Actions
Staff seeks authority to approve available funding from various General Fund, Enterprise Funds and CIP accounts to increase the agreement amounts with Bayview Construction, Inc. (#11352), Olympos Painting Inc. (#11353), and RAMCO Inc. (#11354) for citywide general contractor services. Accounts would be provided by Departments and Divisions when as-need repair services are requested. The costs of these services would be covered using existing budgeted funds within the requesting departments’ budgets.

Agreement Modification Request
Agreement
#
Current
Authorized
Amount
FY 2024-25
Modified
Request
Amount
Future
Years’
Amount
Dept/CIP
Account #
Total
Revised
Contract
Amount
11352 $850,000 $666,667 $1,000,000 Various Accounts $2,516,667 11353 $1,875,000 $666,667 $1,000,000 Various Accounts $3,541,667 11354 $2,250,000 $666,667 $1,000,000 Various Accounts $3,916,667 Future year funding is contingent on Council budget approval.

5.M
Packet Pg. 834
6 of 6
Prepared By: Kyla Johnson, Senior Administrative Analyst Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:

A. Policy for Hiring Contracted Staff_January 13, 2015 Staff Report B. Staff Report January 24, 2023
C. Bayview_Agreement #11352
D. Olympos_Agreement #11353
E. RAMCO_Agreement #11354
F. Oaks Initiative Form - Bayview Construction
G. Levine Act Disclosure Form - Bayview Construction
H. Oaks Initiative Form - RAMCO
I. Levine Act Disclosure Form - RAMCO
J. Oaks Initiative Form - Olympos Construction
K. Levine Act Disclosure Form - Olympos Construction

5.M
Packet Pg. 835

5.M.a
Packet Pg. 836 Attachment: Policy for Hiring Contracted Staff_January 13, 2015 Staff Report (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification)

5.M.a
Packet Pg. 837 Attachment: Policy for Hiring Contracted Staff_January 13, 2015 Staff Report (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: January 24, 2023
Agenda Item: 5.A
1 of 6
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Rick Valte, Public Works Director, Public Works, Facilities Maintenance Subject: Award Bid and Authorize Agreements to Provide Citywide General Contracting Services
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Award Bid #4432 to Bayview Construction, Inc., Olympos Painting, Inc. and RAMCO, General Engineering Contractor, for citywide as-needed general contracting services as required by the Public Works Department.

2. Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute an agreement with Bayview Construction, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $340,000 for two years, with one additional three-year renewal option in the amount of $510,000 for a total amount not to exceed $850,000 over a 5-year period with future year funding contingent on Council budget approval.

3. Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute an agreement with Olympos Painting, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $750,000 for two years, with one additional three-year renewal option in the amount of $1,125,000 for a total amount not to exceed $1,875,000 over a 5-year period with future year funding contingent on Council budget approval.

4. Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute an agreement with RAMCO, General Engineering Contractor, in an amount not to exceed $900,000 for two years, with one additional three-year renewal option in the amount of $1,350,000 for a total amount not to exceed $2,250,000 over a 5-year period with future year funding contingent on Council budget approval.

5. Adopt a finding of Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15301 (Existing Facilities), of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.

Summary
The City utilizes general contractor services to perform work that requires specialized equipment, contractor licensing and technical expertise that cannot be provided by City staff. Staff solicits the services of a general contractor approximately 90 times per year

5.M.b
Packet Pg. 838 Attachment: Staff Report January 24, 2023 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) 2 of 6
to ensure effective and efficient maintenance of the City’s infrastructure. These contracted services range from jobs that require immediate attention due to safety concerns to large-scale repairs that require specific State Contractor Licenses and equipment certifications. Staff recommends a split award for the three best bidders:
• Bayview Construction, Inc. – to provide general contractor repair services in an amount not to exceed $340,000 for two years, with one additional three-year renewal option in the amount of $510,000 including an increase subject to the Cost-of-Living Adjustment (COLA) for renewal years 2 through 5, for a total amount not to exceed $850,000 over a 5-year period
• Olympos Painting, Inc. – to provide general contractor repair services in an amount not to exceed $750,000 for two years, with one additional three-year renewal option in the amount of $1,125,000 including an annual 10% increase for renewal years 3 through 5, for a total amount not to exceed $1,875,000 over a 5- year period
• RAMCO, General Engineering Contractor – to provide general contractor repair services in an amount not to exceed $900,000 for two years, with one additional three-year renewal option in the amount of $1,350,000 including an annual 2% increase for renewal years 2 through 5, for a total amount not to exceed $2,250,000 over a 5-year period
Discussion
The Facilities Maintenance Division employs four in-house staff to provide carpentry services at City facilities. Such services include furniture modifications, locksmith repairs, stucco patching, weather stripping, partition/door installations and the repair of various fixtures throughout the City. Staff solicits the services of a general contractor approximately 90 times per year to respond to citywide general contractor requests and to assist with the overall maintenance of City-owned facilities. These services range from jobs that require immediate attention due to safety concerns such as window repairs, trip hazards and roof leaks to large-scale projects such as wall framing, floor replacements, concrete repairs, playground equipment repairs and office renovations

5.M.b
Packet Pg. 839 Attachment: Staff Report January 24, 2023 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) 3 of 6
and remodeling. The City has historically contracted out general contracting services.

The “Contract and As-Needed Staffing Review Policy, Practice, Recommendations” report (Attachment A) approved on January 13, 2015, recommended that general contracting services be contracted due to equipment requirements, specialized expertise, and risk management. Additionally, to expedite responsiveness to requests for such services, staff recommends a split award to three contractors.

On September 26, 2017 (Attachment B), Council awarded Bid #4285 and authorized the City Manager to negotiate and execute Contract 10550 (Attachment C) with RAMCO General Engineering Contractor, in an amount not to exceed $1,946,211 over a fiveyear period to perform citywide general contractor services. The need for these services are continual thus staff seeks to execute agreements to address: 1) small-scale, urgent and after-hour general contractor repair services, 2) general contractor repair services that require painting and/or waterproofing, and 3) general construction repair services that require renovations, demolition, and framing. The requested not to exceed amounts account for increases in the City’s demand for as-needed general contractor services, prevailing wage rates, material costs and fuel and equipment surcharges.

Vendor Selection
Bidder Recommendation
Best Bidders Bayview Construction, Inc.

Olympos Painting, Inc.

RAMCO, General Engineering Contractor
Evaluation Criteria Bid evaluated on years of municipal general construction experience, pricing, renewal options and requested increases, and price preference for local businesses.

Municipal Code SMMC 2.24.180
Submittals Received
Vendor Hourly Rate Overtime Rate
Bayview Construction, Inc. $71.32 $94.94

5.M.b
Packet Pg. 840 Attachment: Staff Report January 24, 2023 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) 4 of 6
Bid Data
Date Posted Posted On Advertised in (City
Charter & SMMC)
Vendors
Downloaded
Date Publicly
Opened
09/13/2022 City’s Online
Bidding Site
Santa Monica
Daily Press
32 10/11/2022
Best Bidder Justification
Bids were evaluated based on the criteria in SMMC 2.24.180 including years of municipal general construction experience, pricing, renewal options and requested increases, and price preference for local businesses. Staff determined that Bayview Construction, Inc., Olympos Painting, Inc., and RAMCO, General Engineering Contractor are the best bidders based on the following criteria: 1) years of municipal general construction experience, 2) pricing and 3) renewal options and requested increases, and 4) price preference for local businesses. Additionally, staff assessed ability, capacity, and skill by evaluating various California State Contractors licenses each firm possessed.

Environmental Assessment
The awards for general contractor services are categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15301. Section 15301 of the CEQA State Guidelines provides Class 1 (existing facilities) exemption for projects that Plumbing by Todd R. Marsh, Inc. dba TRM $75.00 $95.00
RAMCO, General Engineering Contractor $72.00 $98.50
Olympos Painting, Inc. $76.00 $103.00
Omega Construction Company, Inc. $79.00 $118.50
Concept Consultant, Inc. $137.00 $131.63
Metro Builders & Engineers Group $70.00 $250.00
Tiger Construction, LLC $120.00 $240.00
M. Brey Electric, Inc. $165.00 $220.00
Waisman Construction, Inc. $175.00 $250.00
PUB Construction, Inc. $160.00 $300.00

5.M.b
Packet Pg. 841 Attachment: Staff Report January 24, 2023 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) 5 of 6
consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, leasing, licensing, permitting, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of the existing or former use. The awards for the general contractor services would not result in any modifications to existing facilities. The existing facilities would be maintained and repaired with the general contractor services and the award of services would not expand or materially change existing facilities or operations. Therefore, the project is categorically exempt as set forth in Section 15301 of the CEQA State Guidelines.

Past Council Actions
Meeting Date Description
01/13/15
(Attachment A)
Staff Report – As-Needed and Contract Staffing Review Report 09/26/17
(Attachment B)
Staff Report – City Council authorization to award Bid #4285 to RAMCO and negotiate and execute Contract 10550 for general contractor services
Financial Impacts and Budget Actions
Staff seeks authority to approve available funding from various General Fund, Enterprise Funds and CIP accounts to award agreements with Bayview Construction, Inc., Olympos Painting, Inc., and RAMCO, General Engineering Contractor for citywide general contractor services. Future year funding is contingent on Council budget approval.

Contract Request
Vendor
FY 2022-23
Request Amount
Future Years
Amounts
Department/
CIP Accounts #
Total Contract
Amount
Bayview Construction, Inc. $60,000  $790,000 Various Accounts   $850,000 Olympos Painting, Inc. $250,000 $1,625,000 Various Accounts  $1,875,000 RAMCO General
Engineering Contractor $325,000 $1,925,000 Various Accounts  $2,250,000

5.M.b
Packet Pg. 842 Attachment: Staff Report January 24, 2023 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) 6 of 6
Prepared By: Kyla Johnson, Senior Administrative Analyst Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:

A. January 13, 2015_Staff Report
B. September 26, 2017_Staff Report
C. RAMCO_Contract 10550
D. Bayview_OAKS
E. Olympos_OAKS
F. RAMCO_OAKS

5.M.b
Packet Pg. 843 Attachment: Staff Report January 24, 2023 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) - 1 -
Agreement No. 11352 (CCS)

CONTRACTUAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Contractual Services Agreement (“Agreement”), entered into as of _________________ (“Execution Date”), by and between the CITY OF SANTA MONICA, a municipal corporation (“City”), and BAYVIEW CONSTRUCTION, INC. (“BAYVIEW”), is made with reference to the following:

RECITALS:

A. The City is a municipal corporation duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the State of California with the power to carry on its business as it is now being conducted under the statutes of the State of California and the Charter of the City.

B. BAYVIEW is qualified to do business, and is doing business, in the State of California. BAYVIEW represents it has the background, knowledge, experience and expertise necessary to provide the services set forth in this Agreement.

C. The City and BAYVIEW desire to enter into an agreement for the BAYVIEW to provide contractual services to the City as set forth herein, upon the terms and conditions set forth below.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed by and between the undersigned parties as follows:

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

1. Term. This Agreement begins on the Execution Date and terminates two calendar years after the Execution Date, unless sooner terminated in accordance with Section 14 (“Initial Term”).

1.1 Option to Extend. The City, in its sole and complete discretion, shall have the option to renew this agreement for up to one (1) additional three (3) year period (“Extension Term”), in accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit B.

2. BAYVIEW Services. BAYVIEW will perform all of the services (“Services”) described in Exhibit A, Scope of Services. BAYVIEW will complete the Services in accordance with Exhibit B, Budget.

3. City Services. The City agrees to:

3.1 Make available to BAYVIEW any currently existing documents, data or information required for the performance of the Services.

3.2 Designate a representative authorized to act on behalf of City.

3.3 Promptly examine and render findings on all documents submitted for staff review by BAYVIEW
DocuSign Envelope ID: 48AFA797-7AA3-4841-940A-2A38DD299328 10/12/2023

5.M.c
Packet Pg. 844 Attachment: Bayview_Agreement #11352 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) - 2 -

4. Compensation. The City will compensate BAYVIEW for the Services performed in an amount not to exceed Three Hundred Forty Thousand Dollars ($340,000), as set forth in Exhibit B.

4.1 Total Amount Not To Exceed. In the event the City exercises the (1) additional (3) year renewal option, the total amount for the Term and Extension Term shall not exceed Eight Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($850,000), as set forth in Exhibit B.

5. Invoices. BAYVIEW will invoice the City for the Services in accordance with Exhibit B and the City will pay any undisputed amount within 30 days of receipt.

6. Notices. All notices, demands, requests or approvals to be given under this Agreement, must be in writing and will be deemed served when delivered personally, by email, or on the third business day after deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, registered or certified, addressed as follows:

6.1 All notices, demands, requests or approvals to the City:

Facilities Maintenance Division
City of Santa Monica
2500 Michigan Avenue
Santa Monica, California 90404
Attention: Shidan Adlparvar
Re: Contract No. 11352 (CCS)
with a copy to:

Santa Monica City Attorney’s Office
1685 Main Street, Third Floor
Santa Monica, California 90401
Attention: City Attorney
Re: Contract No. 11352 (CCS)

6.2 All notices, demands, requests or approvals to BAYVIEW:

7. Independent Parties. Both parties to this Agreement will be acting in an independent capacity and not as agents, employees, partners, or joint venturers of one another.

Neither the City nor its officers or employees will have any control over the conduct of BAYVIEW or any of BAYVIEW’s agents, employees, or subcontractors, except as otherwise provided in this Agreement.

8. Integrated Agreement. This Agreement represents the full and complete understanding of every kind or nature whatsoever between the parties. Any preliminary negotiations and agreements of any kind or nature are merged into this Agreement. No oral agreement or implied covenant may be held to vary the provisions DocuSign Envelope ID: 48AFA797-7AA3-4841-940A-2A38DD299328

5.M.c
Packet Pg. 845 Attachment: Bayview_Agreement #11352 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) - 3 -
of this Agreement. This Agreement may be modified only by written agreement signed by City and BAYVIEW, and approved as to form by the City Attorney.

9. Insurance. Prior to commencing work, BAYVIEW must procure, maintain and pay for insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property that may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Services by BAYVIEW or BAYVIEW’s agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors for the duration of this Agreement. BAYVIEW must obtain insurance that, at a minimum, meets the requirements for insurance set forth in Exhibit C, Insurance Requirements and Verifications.

10. Defense and Indemnification.

10.1 BAYVIEW agrees to defend, indemnify, protect, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, boards and commissions, and employees (collectively, “City”) from and against any and all liability, claims, demands, damages, or costs, including but not limited to attorney’s fees, or payments for injury to any person or property (collectively, “Losses”) caused or claimed to be caused by the act, errors, and/or omissions of BAYVIEW, or BAYVIEW’s employees, agents, officers, and subcontractors. BAYVIEW’s responsibilities under this Section 10.1 include liability arising from, connected with, caused by, or claimed to be caused by the active or passive negligent acts or omissions of the City, which may be in combination with the acts or omissions of BAYVIEW, its employees, agents or officers, or subcontractors; provided, however, that BAYVIEW’s duty to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless shall not include any Losses arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City. Notwithstanding BAYVIEW’s obligation to defend City hereunder, City has the right to conduct its own defense and seek reimbursement for reasonable costs of defense from BAYVIEW, if City chooses to do so.

10.2 Enforcement Costs. BAYVIEW agrees to pay any and all costs the City incurs enforcing the indemnity, defense and hold harmless provisions set forth in Section 10.1.

11. Prohibition Against Transfers.

11.1 BAYVIEW may not assign, hypothecate, or transfer this Agreement or any interest therein directly or indirectly, by operation of law or otherwise without the prior written consent of City. Any attempt to do so without the City’s consent will be null and void, and any assignee, hypothecatee or transferee acquires no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer.

11.2 The sale, assignment, transfer or other disposition of any of the issued and outstanding capital stock of BAYVIEW or of any general partner or joint venturer or syndicate member of BAYVIEW, if a partnership or joint venture or DocuSign Envelope ID: 48AFA797-7AA3-4841-940A-2A38DD299328

5.M.c
Packet Pg. 846 Attachment: Bayview_Agreement #11352 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) - 4 -
syndicate exists, which results in changing the control of BAYVIEW, will be construed as an assignment of this Agreement. Control means 50% or more of the voting power of the corporation.

12. Permits and Licenses. BAYVIEW, at its sole expense, must obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement all required business and professional permits, licenses and certificates.

13. Waiver. A waiver of any breach of this Agreement may not be deemed a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant, or condition of this Agreement.

14. Default and Termination.

14.1 If BAYVIEW fails or refuses to perform any of the provisions of this Agreement, and if the default is not cured within a period of five days after the City’s written notice of default specifying the nature of the default, City may immediately terminate this Agreement by written notice to BAYVIEW.

14.2 The City has the option, at its sole discretion and without cause, of terminating this Agreement by giving ten days’ written notice to BAYVIEW. Upon termination of this Agreement, City will pay BAYVIEW any compensation earned and unpaid up to the effective date of termination.

15. Compliance with Law. BAYVIEW must comply with all laws of the State of California and the United States, and all ordinances, rules and regulations enacted or issued by City including, but not limited to, Articles 2 and 3, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 of the Labor Code, State of California related to prevailing wage, apprentices, penalties, and certified payroll.

16. Notice of Registration Requirements with and Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. BAYVIEW hereby acknowledges and agrees that:

16.1No contractor or subcontractor may be listed on a bid proposal for a public works project (submitted on or after March 1, 2015) unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5 [with limited exceptions from this requirement for bid purposes only under Labor Code section 1771.1(a)].

16.2No contractor or subcontractor may be awarded an agreement for public work on a public works project (awarded on or after April 1, 2015) unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5.

16.3This project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 48AFA797-7AA3-4841-940A-2A38DD299328

5.M.c
Packet Pg. 847 Attachment: Bayview_Agreement #11352 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) - 5 -

17. Discrimination. BAYVIEW may not discriminate in the provision of services hereunder because of race, color, religion, national origin, ancestry, sex, age, sexual orientation, marital status, AIDS or disability.

18. Nuisance. BAYVIEW may not maintain, commit, or permit the maintenance or commission of any nuisance in connection with the performance of services under this Agreement.

19. Records.

19.1 BAYVIEW must maintain complete and accurate records with respect to costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by the City for any services provided where compensation is on the basis of hourly rates, subcontractor costs, or other direct costs. BAYVIEW must keep the records, together with supporting documents, separate from other documents and records and maintain them for a period of three years after receipt of final payment.

19.2 BAYVIEW must maintain records in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of the Services and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

BAYVIEW must clearly identify all records and make them readily accessible to the City. At the City’s request, BAYVIEW must provide records in an electronic format and, if necessary, access to any proprietary software to view such electronic records.

19.3 BAYVIEW must allow the City to have free access to BAYVIEW’s books and records and to inspect all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. The City has the right to examine or audit BAYVIEW’s records, and BAYVIEW agrees to cooperate with any examination or audit of its records. If a City audit discloses an error of 5% or more in information reported by BAYVIEW, BAYVIEW agrees to pay the cost of the City’s audit computed on the basis of four times the direct payroll of the audit staff completing the audit and audit report.

20. Work Product; Reports.

20.1 Any work product prepared or caused to be prepared by BAYVIEW or any subcontractor for this Agreement will be the exclusive property of City. No work product given to or prepared by BAYVIEW or any subcontractor pursuant to this Agreement may be made available to any individual or organization by BAYVIEW without prior written approval by City.

20.2 At the City’s request, BAYVIEW must furnish reports concerning the status of the Services.

21. Standard of Care. BAYVIEW agrees to provide all Services, including services performed by any subcontractor, in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill DocuSign Envelope ID: 48AFA797-7AA3-4841-940A-2A38DD299328

5.M.c
Packet Pg. 848 Attachment: Bayview_Agreement #11352 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) - 6 -
ordinarily exercised by members of BAYVIEW’s profession currently practicing in the same locality under similar conditions.

22. Subcontractors.

22.1 If BAYVIEW proposes to have any subcontractor perform any part of the Services, BAYVIEW must submit a request for approval in writing, describing the scope of work to be subcontracted, the name of the proposed subcontractor, and the total price or hourly rates used in preparing an estimated cost for the subcontractor’s services. The City, in its sole discretion, may grant or deny the request.

22.2 BAYVIEW will be responsible for the quality of any subcontractor’s work. Every subcontract or agreement of any kind entered into between BAYVIEW and any subcontractor (or between any subcontractor and others) must contain the following provision:

This agreement is consistent with all terms and conditions of the Agreement No. 11352 (CCS) entered into between the City of Santa Monica and BAYVIEW
on^^____________________.

23. Governing Law. The laws of the State of California, without regard to any choice of law provisions, will govern this Agreement.

24. Venue and Jurisdiction. The City and BAYVIEW agree that the Services will take place in Los Angeles County. Any litigation arising out of this Agreement may only be brought in either the United States District Court, Central District of California, or the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, West District, as appropriate. The parties agree that venue exists in either court, and each party expressly waives any right to transfer to another venue. The parties further agree that either court will have personal jurisdiction over the parties to this Agreement.

25. Survival of Provisions and Obligations. Any provision of this Agreement, which by its nature must be exercised after termination of this Agreement, will survive termination and remain effective for a reasonable time. Any obligation that accrued prior to termination of this Agreement will survive termination of this Agreement.

26. Execution in Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts with the same effect as if both parties hereto had executed the same document. All counterparts shall be construed together and shall constitute a single Agreement. Any signature to this Agreement transmitted electronically through DocuSign or PDF shall be deemed an original signature and be binding upon the parties hereto (it being agreed that such electronic signature shall have the same force and effect as an original signature).

DocuSign Envelope ID: 48AFA797-7AA3-4841-940A-2A38DD299328 10/12/2023

5.M.c
Packet Pg. 849 Attachment: Bayview_Agreement #11352 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) - 7 -
///

27. Exhibits. The following exhibits are incorporated by reference into this Agreement as though fully set forth herein.

Exhibit A Scope of Services
Exhibit B Budget
Exhibit C Insurance Requirements
In witness whereof, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written.

ATTEST:
______________________________

DENISE ANDERSON-WARREN
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________

LANE DILG
City Attorney

CITY OF SANTA MONICA,
a municipal corporation
By: ______________________________

RICK COLE
City Manager

BAYVIEW
#VENDOR
By: ________________________________
DocuSign Envelope ID: 48AFA797-7AA3-4841-940A-2A38DD299328 9/26/2023

DOUGLAS SLOAN
City Attorney
10/12/2023
Ulrich Dargel

PRESIDENT
BAYVIEW CONSTRUCTION, INC.
10/12/2023
Dave White
City Manager
Denise Anderson-Warren
City Clerk
10/16/2023

5.M.c
Packet Pg. 850 Attachment: Bayview_Agreement #11352 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) Exhibit A
Scope of Services

1. GENERAL. BAYVIEW shall provide general contractor services as required by the Facilities Maintenance Division. Work may include, but is not limited to, renovations, remodels, door and window installations, siding repairs, demolition work, framing, interior finishes and wood/beam/joist repairs. Jobs shall be quoted individually and requested as required (no guaranteed usage).

2. APPROVAL OF WORK. BAYVIEW shall provide a written proposal with pricing for approval for all jobs requested by Facilities Maintenance staff. All work under this contract must be authorized by either a Facilities Supervisor, Facilities Services Administrator or Facilities Services Manager. City staff shall approve all jobs in writing prior to the start of work (generally in the form of an e-mail) with the exception of emergency work requested by staff to address a clear and present hazard to the public, City staff, the environment and/or City property. A written proposal or invoice shall be submitted to the City with accurate cost information as soon as is practicable after emergency work approval based on a verbally provided cost estimate.

3. CONTRACTORS LICENSE / REGISTRATION WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS. BAYVIEW shall maintain a valid B General Building Contractor License during the term of this Agreement. BAYVIEW shall maintain a valid registration as a Public Works contractor on the Department of Industrial Relations website: http://www.dir.ca.gov/PublicWorks/PublicWorks.html

4. PERFORMANCE OF WORK. Work dates / times shall be coordinated in advance with Facilities Services staff who shall facilitate access to City locations. The City may opt to provide materials and/or labor to assist with various plumbing contractor work.

5. PREVAILING WAGE / CERTIFIED PAYROLL RECORDS. BAYVIEW shall perform all Services under this contract under prevailing wage. Certified payroll records shall be submitted electronically via the State Department of Industrial Relations’ electronic Certified Payroll Reporting (eCPR) system, and if requested, to Facilities Maintenance staff.

6. WASTE MATERIALS DISPOSAL. BAYVIEW shall remove any hazardous waste materials generated by work performed under this contract per Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations. It is BAYVIEW’s sole responsibility to ensure that all hazardous waste materials are either recycled safely and effectively or treated and disposed of in landfills or incinerators per EPA guidelines.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 48AFA797-7AA3-4841-940A-2A38DD299328

5.M.c
Packet Pg. 851 Attachment: Bayview_Agreement #11352 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) Exhibit B
Budget
I. Labor Rates. Jobs shall be quoted individually with specifications provided by Facilities Maintenance staff using the labor rates noted below (per Bid 4432):

Initial Term Regular Labor Rate (per
hour)
Overtime Labor Rate (per hour)
Year 1 $71.32 $94.94
Year 2 $71.32 $94.94
Extension Term Regular Labor Rate (per
hour)
Overtime Labor Rate (per hour)
Year 3 * *
Year 4 * *
Year 5 * *
*Increase from Initial Term subject to the Cost-of-Living Adjustment (C0LA) for renewal years 3-5, for a total amount not to exceed $850,000 over a 5-year period II. Additional Pricing.

2.1.1. Material = cost + 10%

2.1.2. Rates for equipment, materials and reimburseables shall be indicated on individual job proposals.

III. Contract Term. The City will compensate BAYVIEW for the Services performed during the Initial Term in an amount not to exceed $340,000.

IV. Extension Term(s). In the event the City exercises the (1) additional (3) year renewal option, the total amount of the Contract Term and Extension Term(s) shall not exceed $850,000.

V. Invoices. BAYVIEW shall invoice the City per job under Net 30 terms.

Exhibit C
Insurance Requirements
DocuSign Envelope ID: 48AFA797-7AA3-4841-940A-2A38DD299328

5.M.c
Packet Pg. 852 Attachment: Bayview_Agreement #11352 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) Contractual Services Agreement Insurance Requirements
Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property that may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors.

Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

1. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an “occurrence” basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal and advertising injury, with limits of no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (Insurance Services Office Form CG 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

2. Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Form CA 00 01 covering Code 1 (any auto), or if Contractor has no owned autos, Code 8 (hired) and Code 9 (non-owned), with limits of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

If the Contractor maintains broader coverage or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City of Santa Monica requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage or higher limits maintained by the Contractor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City of Santa Monica.

Other Insurance Provisions

1. The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
a. Additional Insured Status: The City of Santa Monica, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of Contractor including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. CGL coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Contractor’s insurance (at least as broad as DocuSign Envelope ID: 48AFA797-7AA3-4841-940A-2A38DD299328

5.M.c
Packet Pg. 853 Attachment: Bayview_Agreement #11352 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) Insurance Services Office Form CG 20 10 11 85, or if not available, through the addition of both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38 and CG 20 37). b. Primary Coverage: For any claims related to this Agreement, the Contractor’s insurance shall be primary coverage as least as broad as Insurance Services Office Form CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City of Santa Monica, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City of Santa Monica, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be in excess of the Contractor’s insurance and shall not contribute with it. c. Notice of Cancellation: Each insurance policy required herein shall state that coverage shall not be cancelled except after notice has been given to the City of Santa Monica.
d. Waiver of Subrogation: Contractor hereby grants to the City of Santa Monica a waiver of any right of subrogation which any insurer of said Contractor may acquire against the City of Santa Monica by virtue of payment of any loss. Contractor agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City of Santa Monica has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.

Self-Insured Retentions
Self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City of Santa Monica. The City of Santa Monica may require the Contractor to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide satisfactory proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self-insured retention may be satisfied by either the name insured or the City of Santa Monica.

Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in California with a current A.M. Best rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City of Santa Monica.

Verification of Coverage
Contractor shall furnish the City of Santa Monica with original certificates and amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage provided by this clause). All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City DocuSign Envelope ID: 48AFA797-7AA3-4841-940A-2A38DD299328

5.M.c
Packet Pg. 854 Attachment: Bayview_Agreement #11352 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) of Santa Monica before work commences. However, failure to obtain required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Contractor’s obligation to provide them.

The City of Santa Monica reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including the endorsements required herein, at any time.

Failure to Maintain Insurance Coverage
If Contractor, for any reason, fails to maintain insurance coverage which is required pursuant to this Agreement, the same shall be deemed a material breach of contract. The City of Santa Monica, at its sole option, may terminate this Agreement and obtain damages from the Contractor resulting from said breach.

Subcontractors
Contractor shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein. All exceptions must be approved in writing by the Risk Manager.

Footnotes
# 1: Workers’ Compensation insurance coverage is not required if the Contractor does not have employees. The Contractor must, however, execute the City’s Workers’ Compensation Coverage Exemption Declaration Form.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 48AFA797-7AA3-4841-940A-2A38DD299328

5.M.c
Packet Pg. 855 Attachment: Bayview_Agreement #11352 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) - 1 -
Agreement No. 11353 (CCS)

CONTRACTUAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Contractual Services Agreement (“Agreement”), entered into as of _________________ (“Execution Date”), by and between the CITY OF SANTA MONICA, a municipal corporation (“City”), and Olympos Painting, Inc., DBA: Olympos Construction (“OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION”), is made with reference to the following:

RECITALS:

B. OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION is qualified to do business, and is doing business, in the State of California. OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION represents it has the background, knowledge, experience and expertise necessary to provide the services set forth in this Agreement.

C. The City and OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION desire to enter into an agreement for OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION to provide contractual services to the City as set forth herein, upon the terms and conditions set forth below.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed by and between the undersigned parties as follows:

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

1. Term. This Agreement begins on the Execution Date and terminates two calendar years after the Execution Date (“Term”), unless sooner terminated in accordance with Section 14 or extended pursuant to Section 1.1, below.

1.1. Option to Extend. The City, in its sole and complete discretion, shall have the option to renew this agreement for up to one (1) additional three (3) year period ("Extension Term"), in accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit B. The City may exercise its option to extend by letter written by the City Manager.

2. OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION Services. OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION will perform all of the services (“Services”) described in Exhibit A, Scope of Services.

OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION will complete the Services in accordance with Exhibit B, Budget.

3. City Services. The City agrees to:

Make available to OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION any currently existing documents, data or information required for the performance of the Services.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DCA47081-4DC0-4BB9-8118-39F27203F943 6/2/2023

5.M.d
Packet Pg. 856 Attachment: Olympos_Agreement #11353 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) - 2 -

3.1 Designate a representative authorized to act on behalf of City.

3.2 Promptly examine and render findings on all documents submitted for staff review by OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION.

4. Compensation. The City will compensate OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION for the Services performed in an amount not to exceed Seven Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($750,000), as set forth in Exhibit B.

4.1 Total Amount Not To Exceed. In the event the City exercises the (1) additional (3) year renewal option, the total amount for the Term and Extension Term shall not exceed One Million Eight Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand Dollars ($1,875,000), as set forth in Exhibit B.

5. Invoices. OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION will invoice the City for the Services in accordance with Exhibit B and the City will pay any undisputed amount within 30 days of receipt.

6.1 All notices, demands, requests or approvals to the City:

Facilities Maintenance Division
City of Santa Monica
2500 Michigan Avenue
Santa Monica, California 90404
Attention: Shidan Adlparvar
Re: Agreement No. 11353
with a copy to:

Santa Monica City Attorney’s Office
1685 Main Street, Third Floor
Santa Monica, California 90401
Attention: City Attorney
Re: Agreement No. 11353

6.2 All notices, demands, requests or approvals to OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION:

Olympos Construction, Inc.
80 W Cochran Street, Unit A
Simi Valley, California 93065
Attention: Christos Skianis
Re: Agreement No. 11353
DocuSign Envelope ID: DCA47081-4DC0-4BB9-8118-39F27203F943

5.M.d
Packet Pg. 857 Attachment: Olympos_Agreement #11353 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) - 3 -

7. Independent Parties. Both parties to this Agreement will be acting in an independent capacity and not as agents, employees, partners, or joint venturers of one another.

Neither the City nor its officers or employees will have any control over the conduct of OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION or any of OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION’s agents, employees, or subcontractors, except as otherwise provided in this Agreement.

8. Integrated Agreement. This Agreement represents the full and complete understanding of every kind or nature whatsoever between the parties. Any preliminary negotiations and agreements of any kind or nature are merged into this Agreement. No oral agreement or implied covenant may be held to vary the provisions of this Agreement. This Agreement may be modified only by written agreement signed by City and OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION, and approved as to form by the City Attorney.

9. Insurance. Prior to commencing work, OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION must procure, maintain and pay for insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property that may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Services by OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION or OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION’s agents,
representatives, employees or subcontractors for the duration of this Agreement.

OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION must obtain insurance that, at a minimum, meets the requirements for insurance set forth in Exhibit C, Insurance Requirements and Verifications.

10. Defense and Indemnification.

10.1 OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION agrees to defend, indemnify, protect, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, boards and commissions, and employees (collectively, “City”) from and against any and all liability, claims, demands, damages, or costs, including but not limited to attorney’s fees, or payments for injury to any person or property (collectively, “Losses”) caused or claimed to be caused by the act, errors, and/or omissions of OLYMPOS
CONSTRUCTION, or OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION’s employees, agents, officers, and subcontractors. OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION’s responsibilities under this Section 10.1 include liability arising from, connected with, caused by, or claimed to be caused by the active or passive negligent acts or omissions of the City, which may be in combination with the acts or omissions of OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION, its employees, agents or officers, or subcontractors; provided, however, that OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION’s duty to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless shall not include any Losses arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City.

Notwithstanding OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION’s obligation to defend City hereunder, City has the right to conduct its own defense and seek reimbursement for reasonable costs of defense from OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION, if City chooses to do so.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DCA47081-4DC0-4BB9-8118-39F27203F943

5.M.d
Packet Pg. 858 Attachment: Olympos_Agreement #11353 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) - 4 -

10.2 Enforcement Costs. OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION agrees to pay any and all costs the City incurs enforcing the indemnity, defense and hold harmless provisions set forth in Section 10.1.

11. Prohibition Against Transfers.

11.1 OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION may not assign, hypothecate, or transfer this Agreement or any interest therein directly or indirectly, by operation of law or otherwise without the prior written consent of City. Any attempt to do so without the City’s consent will be null and void, and any assignee, hypothecatee or transferee acquires no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer.

11.2 The sale, assignment, transfer or other disposition of any of the issued and outstanding capital stock of OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION or of any general partner or joint venturer or syndicate member of OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION, if a partnership or joint venture or syndicate exists, which results in changing the control of OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION, will be construed as an assignment of this Agreement. Control means 50% or more of the voting power of the corporation.

12. Permits and Licenses. OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION, at its sole expense, must obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement all required business and professional permits, licenses and certificates.

13. Waiver. A waiver of any breach of this Agreement may not be deemed a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant, or condition of this Agreement.

14. Default and Termination.

14.1 If OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION fails or refuses to perform any of the provisions of this Agreement, and if the default is not cured within a period of five days after the City’s written notice of default specifying the nature of the default, City may immediately terminate this Agreement by written notice to OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION.

14.2 The City has the option, at its sole discretion and without cause, of terminating this Agreement by giving ten days’ written notice to OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION. Upon termination of this Agreement, City will pay OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION any compensation earned and unpaid up to the effective date of termination.

15. Compliance with Law. OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION must comply with all laws of the State of California and the United States, and all ordinances, rules and regulations enacted or issued by City including, but not limited to, Articles 2 and 3, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 of the Labor Code, State of California related to prevailing wage, apprentices, penalties, and certified payroll.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DCA47081-4DC0-4BB9-8118-39F27203F943

5.M.d
Packet Pg. 859 Attachment: Olympos_Agreement #11353 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) - 5 -

16. Notice of Registration Requirements with and Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION hereby acknowledges and agrees that:

16.3This project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.

17. Discrimination. OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION may not discriminate in the provision of services hereunder because of race, color, religion, national origin, ancestry, sex, age, sexual orientation, marital status, AIDS or disability.

18. Nuisance. OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION may not maintain, commit, or permit the maintenance or commission of any nuisance in connection with the performance of services under this Agreement.

19. Records.

19.1 OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION must maintain complete and accurate records with respect to costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by the City for any services provided where compensation is on the basis of hourly rates, subcontractor costs, or other direct costs. OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION must keep the records, together with supporting documents, separate from other documents and records and maintain them for a period of three years after receipt of final payment.

19.2 OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION must maintain records in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of the Services and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION must clearly identify all records and make them readily accessible to the City. At the City’s request, OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION must provide records in an electronic format and, if necessary, access to any proprietary software to view such electronic records.

19.3 OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION must allow the City to have free access to OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION’s books and records and to inspect all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. The City has the right to examine or audit OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION’s records, and OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION agrees to cooperate with any examination or DocuSign Envelope ID: DCA47081-4DC0-4BB9-8118-39F27203F943

5.M.d
Packet Pg. 860 Attachment: Olympos_Agreement #11353 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) - 6 -
audit of its records. If a City audit discloses an error of 5% or more in information reported by OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION, OLYMPOS
CONSTRUCTION agrees to pay the cost of the City’s audit computed on the basis of four times the direct payroll of the audit staff completing the audit and audit report.

20. Work Product; Reports.

20.1 Any work product prepared or caused to be prepared by OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION or any subcontractor for this Agreement will be the exclusive property of City. No work product given to or prepared by OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION or any subcontractor pursuant to this Agreement may be made available to any individual or organization by OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION without prior written approval by City.

20.2 At the City’s request, OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION must furnish reports concerning the status of the Services.

21. Standard of Care. OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION agrees to provide all Services, including services performed by any subcontractor, in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION’s profession currently practicing in the same locality under similar conditions.

22. Subcontractors.

22.1 If OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION proposes to have any subcontractor perform any part of the Services, OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION must submit a request for approval in writing, describing the scope of work to be subcontracted, the name of the proposed subcontractor, and the total price or hourly rates used in preparing an estimated cost for the subcontractor’s services. The City, in its sole discretion, may grant or deny the request.

22.2 OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION will be responsible for the quality of any subcontractor’s work. Every subcontract or agreement of any kind entered into between OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION and any subcontractor (or between any subcontractor and others) must contain the following provision:

This agreement is consistent with all terms and conditions of the Agreement No. 11353 (CCS) entered into between the City of Santa Monica and OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION
on^^____________________.

23. Governing Law. The laws of the State of California, without regard to any choice of law provisions, will govern this Agreement.

24. Venue and Jurisdiction. The City and OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION agree that the Services will take place in Los Angeles County. Any litigation arising out of this DocuSign Envelope ID: DCA47081-4DC0-4BB9-8118-39F27203F943 6/2/2023

5.M.d
Packet Pg. 861 Attachment: Olympos_Agreement #11353 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) - 7 -
Agreement may only be brought in either the United States District Court, Central District of California, or the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, West District, as appropriate. The parties agree that venue exists in either court, and each party expressly waives any right to transfer to another venue. The parties further agree that either court will have personal jurisdiction over the parties to this Agreement.

5.M.d
Packet Pg. 862 Attachment: Olympos_Agreement #11353 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) - 8 -

27. Exhibits. The following exhibits are incorporated by reference into this Agreement as though fully set forth herein.

Exhibit A Scope of Services
Exhibit B Budget
Exhibit C Insurance Requirements
In witness whereof, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written.

ATTEST:
______________________________

DENISE ANDERSON-WARREN
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________

LANE DILG
City Attorney

CITY OF SANTA MONICA,
a municipal corporation
By: ______________________________

RICK COLE
City Manager
OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION Corporation
#VENDOR
By: ________________________________
DocuSign Envelope ID: DCA47081-4DC0-4BB9-8118-39F27203F943

DOUGLAS SLOAN
6/2/2023
City Attorney
Christos Skianis
6/2/2023
CFO
Olympos Construction, Inc.
6/2/2023
City Manager
David White
City Clerk
6/15/2023
Denise Anderson-Warren

5.M.d
Packet Pg. 863 Attachment: Olympos_Agreement #11353 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) Exhibit A
Scope of Services

1. GENERAL. OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION shall provide general contractor services as required by the Facilities Maintenance Division. Work may include, but is not limited to, renovations, remodels, door and window installations, siding repairs, demolition work, framing, interior finishes and wood/beam/joist repairs. Jobs shall be quoted individually and requested as required (no guaranteed usage).

2. APPROVAL OF WORK. OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION shall provide a written proposal with pricing for approval for all jobs requested by Facilities Maintenance staff. All work under this contract must be authorized by either a Facilities Supervisor, Facilities Services Administrator or Facilities Services Manager. City staff shall approve all jobs in writing prior to the start of work (generally in the form of an e-mail) with the exception of emergency work requested by staff to address a clear and present hazard to the public, City staff, the environment and/or City property. A written proposal or invoice shall be submitted to the City with accurate cost information as soon as is practicable after emergency work approval based on a verbally provided cost estimate.

3. CONTRACTORS LICENSE / REGISTRATION WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS. OLYMPOS
CONSTRUCTION shall maintain a valid B General Building Contractor License during the term of this agreement. OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION shall maintain a valid registration as a Public Works contractor on the Department of Industrial Relations website: http://www.dir.ca.gov/Public-Works/PublicWorks.html

5. PREVAILING WAGE / CERTIFIED PAYROLL RECORDS. OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION shall perform all services under this contract under prevailing wage.

Certified payroll records shall be submitted electronically via the State Department of Industrial Relations’ electronic Certified Payroll Reporting (eCPR) system, and if requested, to Facilities Maintenance staff.

6. WASTE MATERIALS DISPOSAL. OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION shall remove any hazardous waste materials generated by work performed under this contract per Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations. It is OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION’s sole responsibility to ensure that all hazardous waste materials are either recycled safely and effectively or treated and disposed of in landfills or incinerators per EPA guidelines.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DCA47081-4DC0-4BB9-8118-39F27203F943

5.M.d
Packet Pg. 864 Attachment: Olympos_Agreement #11353 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) Exhibit B
Budget
I. Labor Rates. Jobs shall be quoted individually with specifications provided by Facilities Maintenance staff using the labor rates noted below (per Bid 4432):

Contract Term Regular Labor Rate (per
hour)
Overtime Labor Rate (per hour)
Year 1 $76.00 $103.00
Year 2 $76.00 $103.00
Extension Term Regular Labor Rate (per
hour)
Overtime Labor Rate (per hour)
Year 3 $83.60 $113.30
Year 4 $91.96 $124.63
Year 5 $101.16 $137.09
II. Additional Pricing.

2.1.1. Material = cost + 0%

2.1.2. Rates for equipment, materials and reimburseables shall be indicated on individual job proposals.

III. Contract Term. The City will compensate OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION for the services performed in an amount not to exceed $750,000.

IV. Extension Term(s). In the event the City exercises the (1) additional (3) year renewal option, the total amount of the Contract Term and Extension Term(s) shall not exceed $1,875,000.

V. Invoices. OLYMPOS CONSTRUCTION shall invoice the City per job under Net 30 terms.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DCA47081-4DC0-4BB9-8118-39F27203F943

5.M.d
Packet Pg. 865 Attachment: Olympos_Agreement #11353 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) Exhibit C
Insurance Requirements
Contractual Services Agreement Insurance Requirements
Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property that may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors.

Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

1. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an “occurrence” basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal and advertising injury, with limits of no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (Insurance Services Office Form CG 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

Other Insurance Provisions

5.M.d
Packet Pg. 866 Attachment: Olympos_Agreement #11353 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) behalf of Contractor including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. CGL coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Contractor’s insurance (at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Form CG 20 10 11 85, or if not available, through the addition of both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38 and CG 20 37). b. Primary Coverage: For any claims related to this Agreement, the Contractor’s insurance shall be primary coverage as least as broad as Insurance Services Office Form CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City of Santa Monica, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City of Santa Monica, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be in excess of the Contractor’s insurance and shall not contribute with it. c. Notice of Cancellation: Each insurance policy required herein shall state that coverage shall not be cancelled except after notice has been given to the City of Santa Monica.
d. Waiver of Subrogation: Contractor hereby grants to the City of Santa Monica a waiver of any right of subrogation which any insurer of said Contractor may acquire against the City of Santa Monica by virtue of payment of any loss. Contractor agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City of Santa Monica has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.

Verification of Coverage
DocuSign Envelope ID: DCA47081-4DC0-4BB9-8118-39F27203F943

5.M.d
Packet Pg. 867 Attachment: Olympos_Agreement #11353 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) Contractor shall furnish the City of Santa Monica with original certificates and amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage provided by this clause). All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City of Santa Monica before work commences. However, failure to obtain required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Contractor’s obligation to provide them.

The City of Santa Monica reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including the endorsements required herein, at any time.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DCA47081-4DC0-4BB9-8118-39F27203F943

5.M.d
Packet Pg. 868 Attachment: Olympos_Agreement #11353 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) - 1 -
Agreement No. 11354 (CCS)

CONTRACTUAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Contractual Services Agreement (“Agreement”), entered into as of _________________ (“Execution Date”), by and between the CITY OF SANTA MONICA, a municipal corporation (“City”), and RAMCO General Engineering Contractors (“RAMCO”), is made with reference to the following:

RECITALS:

B. RAMCO is qualified to do business, and is doing business, in the State of California.

RAMCO represents it has the background, knowledge, experience and expertise necessary to provide the services set forth in this Agreement.

C. The City and RAMCO desire to enter into an agreement for RAMCO to provide contractual services to the City as set forth herein, upon the terms and conditions set forth below.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed by and between the undersigned parties as follows:

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

1. Term. This Agreement begins on the Execution Date and terminates two calendar years after the Execution Date, unless sooner terminated in accordance with Section

14. 1.1 Option to Extend. The City, in its sole and complete discretion, shall have the option to renew this agreement for up to one (1) additional three (3) year period (“Extension Term”), in accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit B.

2. RAMCO Services. RAMCO will perform all of the services (“Services”) described in Exhibit A, Scope of Services. RAMCO will complete the Services in accordance with Exhibit B, Budget.

3. City Services. The City agrees to:

3.1 Make available to RAMCO any currently existing documents, data or information required for the performance of the Services.

3.2 Designate a representative authorized to act on behalf of City.

3.3 Promptly examine and render findings on all documents submitted for staff review by RAMCO.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 2745FEFD-B906-4CE2-A90B-134D49221763 3/31/2023

5.M.e
Packet Pg. 869 Attachment: RAMCO_Agreement #11354 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) - 2 -

4. Compensation. The City will compensate RAMCO for the Services performed in an amount not to exceed Nine Hundred Thousand Dollars ($900,000), as set forth in Exhibit B.

4.1 Total Amount Not To Exceed. In the event the City exercises the (1) additional 3-year renewal option, the total amount for the Term and Extension Term shall not exceed Two Million Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($2,250,000), as set forth in Exhibit B.

5. Invoices. RAMCO will invoice the City for the Services in accordance with Exhibit B and the City will pay any undisputed amount within 30 days of receipt.

6.1 All notices, demands, requests or approvals to the City:

Facilities Maintenance Division
City of Santa Monica
2500 Michigan Avenue
Santa Monica, California 90404
Attention: Shidan Adlparvar
Re: Agreement No. 11354
with a copy to:

Santa Monica City Attorney’s Office
1685 Main Street, Third Floor
Santa Monica, California 90401
Attention: City Attorney
Re: Agreement No. 11354

6.2 All notices, demands, requests or approvals to RAMCO:

RAMCO
PO Box 920878
Sylmar, California 91390
Attention: Emilio Ramirez
[email protected]
Re: Agreement No. 11354

7. Independent Parties. Both parties to this Agreement will be acting in an independent capacity and not as agents, employees, partners, or joint venturers of one another.

Neither the City nor its officers or employees will have any control over the conduct DocuSign Envelope ID: 2745FEFD-B906-4CE2-A90B-134D49221763

5.M.e
Packet Pg. 870 Attachment: RAMCO_Agreement #11354 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) - 3 -
of RAMCO or any of RAMCO’s agents, employees, or subcontractors, except as otherwise provided in this Agreement.

8. Integrated Agreement. This Agreement represents the full and complete understanding of every kind or nature whatsoever between the parties. Any preliminary negotiations and agreements of any kind or nature are merged into this Agreement. No oral agreement or implied covenant may be held to vary the provisions of this Agreement. This Agreement may be modified only by written agreement signed by City and RAMCO, and approved as to form by the City Attorney.

9. Insurance. Prior to commencing work, RAMCO must procure, maintain and pay for insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property that may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Services by RAMCO or RAMCO’s agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors for the duration of this Agreement. RAMCO must obtain insurance that, at a minimum, meets the requirements for insurance set forth in Exhibit C, Insurance Requirements and Verifications.

10. Defense and Indemnification.

10.1 RAMCO agrees to defend, indemnify, protect, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, boards and commissions, and employees (collectively, “City”) from and against any and all liability, claims, demands, damages, or costs, including but not limited to attorney’s fees, or payments for injury to any person or property (collectively, “Losses”) caused or claimed to be caused by the act, errors, and/or omissions of RAMCO, or RAMCO’s employees, agents, officers, and subcontractors. RAMCO’s responsibilities under this Section

10.1 include liability arising from, connected with, caused by, or claimed to be caused by the active or passive negligent acts or omissions of the City, which may be in combination with the acts or omissions of RAMCO, its employees, agents or officers, or subcontractors; provided, however, that RAMCO’s duty to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless shall not include any Losses arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City.

Notwithstanding RAMCO’s obligation to defend City hereunder, City has the right to conduct its own defense and seek reimbursement for reasonable costs of defense from RAMCO, if City chooses to do so.

10.2 Enforcement Costs. RAMCO agrees to pay any and all costs the City incurs enforcing the indemnity, defense and hold harmless provisions set forth in Section 10.1.

11. Prohibition Against Transfers.

11.1 RAMCO may not assign, hypothecate, or transfer this Agreement or any interest therein directly or indirectly, by operation of law or otherwise without the prior written consent of City. Any attempt to do so without the City’s consent will be DocuSign Envelope ID: 2745FEFD-B906-4CE2-A90B-134D49221763

5.M.e
Packet Pg. 871 Attachment: RAMCO_Agreement #11354 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) - 4 -
null and void, and any assignee, hypothecatee or transferee acquires no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer.

11.2 The sale, assignment, transfer or other disposition of any of the issued and outstanding capital stock of RAMCO or of any general partner or joint venturer or syndicate member of RAMCO, if a partnership or joint venture or syndicate exists, which results in changing the control of RAMCO, will be construed as an assignment of this Agreement. Control means 50% or more of the voting power of the corporation.

12. Permits and Licenses. RAMCO, at its sole expense, must obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement all required business and professional permits, licenses and certificates.

13. Waiver. A waiver of any breach of this Agreement may not be deemed a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant, or condition of this Agreement.

14. Default and Termination.

14.1 If RAMCO fails or refuses to perform any of the provisions of this Agreement, and if the default is not cured within a period of five days after the City’s written notice of default specifying the nature of the default, City may immediately terminate this Agreement by written notice to RAMCO.

14.2 The City has the option, at its sole discretion and without cause, of terminating this Agreement by giving ten days’ written notice to RAMCO. Upon termination of this Agreement, City will pay RAMCO any compensation earned and unpaid up to the effective date of termination.

15. Compliance with Law. RAMCO must comply with all laws of the State of California and the United States, and all ordinances, rules and regulations enacted or issued by City including, but not limited to, Articles 2 and 3, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 of the Labor Code, State of California related to prevailing wage, apprentices, penalties, and certified payroll.

16. Notice of Registration Requirements with and Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. RAMCO hereby acknowledges and agrees that:

DocuSign Envelope ID: 2745FEFD-B906-4CE2-A90B-134D49221763

5.M.e
Packet Pg. 872 Attachment: RAMCO_Agreement #11354 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) - 5 -

16.3This project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.

17. Discrimination. RAMCO may not discriminate in the provision of services hereunder because of race, color, religion, national origin, ancestry, sex, age, sexual orientation, marital status, AIDS or disability.

18. Nuisance. RAMCO may not maintain, commit, or permit the maintenance or commission of any nuisance in connection with the performance of services under this Agreement.

19. Records.

19.1 RAMCO must maintain complete and accurate records with respect to costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by the City for any services provided where compensation is on the basis of hourly rates, subcontractor costs, or other direct costs. RAMCO must keep the records, together with supporting documents, separate from other documents and records and maintain them for a period of three years after receipt of final payment.

19.2 RAMCO must maintain records in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of the Services and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

RAMCO must clearly identify all records and make them readily accessible to the City. At the City’s request, RAMCO must provide records in an electronic format and, if necessary, access to any proprietary software to view such electronic records.

19.3 RAMCO must allow the City to have free access to RAMCO’s books and records and to inspect all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. The City has the right to examine or audit RAMCO’s records, and RAMCO agrees to cooperate with any examination or audit of its records. If a City audit discloses an error of 5% or more in information reported by RAMCO, RAMCO agrees to pay the cost of the City’s audit computed on the basis of four times the direct payroll of the audit staff completing the audit and audit report.

20. Work Product; Reports.

20.1 Any work product prepared or caused to be prepared by RAMCO or any subcontractor for this Agreement will be the exclusive property of City. No work product given to or prepared by RAMCO or any subcontractor pursuant to this Agreement may be made available to any individual or organization by RAMCO without prior written approval by City.

20.2 At the City’s request, RAMCO must furnish reports concerning the status of the Services.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 2745FEFD-B906-4CE2-A90B-134D49221763

5.M.e
Packet Pg. 873 Attachment: RAMCO_Agreement #11354 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) - 6 -

21. Standard of Care. RAMCO agrees to provide all Services, including services performed by any subcontractor, in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of RAMCO’s profession currently practicing in the same locality under similar conditions.

22. Subcontractors.

22.1 If RAMCO proposes to have any subcontractor perform any part of the Services, RAMCO must submit a request for approval in writing, describing the scope of work to be subcontracted, the name of the proposed subcontractor, and the total price or hourly rates used in preparing an estimated cost for the subcontractor’s services. The City, in its sole discretion, may grant or deny the request.

22.2 RAMCO will be responsible for the quality of any subcontractor’s work. Every subcontract or agreement of any kind entered into between RAMCO and any subcontractor (or between any subcontractor and others) must contain the following provision:

This agreement is consistent with all terms and conditions of the Agreement No. 11354 (CCS) entered into between the City of Santa Monica and RAMCO on^^____________________.

23. Governing Law. The laws of the State of California, without regard to any choice of law provisions, will govern this Agreement.

24. Venue and Jurisdiction. The City and RAMCO agree that the Services will take place in Los Angeles County. Any litigation arising out of this Agreement may only be brought in either the United States District Court, Central District of California, or the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, West District, as appropriate. The parties agree that venue exists in either court, and each party expressly waives any right to transfer to another venue. The parties further agree that either court will have personal jurisdiction over the parties to this Agreement.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 2745FEFD-B906-4CE2-A90B-134D49221763 3/31/2023

5.M.e
Packet Pg. 874 Attachment: RAMCO_Agreement #11354 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) - 7 -

27. Exhibits. The following exhibits are incorporated by reference into this Agreement as though fully set forth herein.

Exhibit A Scope of Services
Exhibit B Budget
Exhibit C Insurance Requirements
In witness whereof, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written.

ATTEST:
______________________________

DENISE ANDERSON-WARREN
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________

LANE DILG
City Attorney

CITY OF SANTA MONICA,
a municipal corporation
By: ______________________________

RICK COLE
City Manager
RAMCO, General Engineering Contractor
#VENDOR
By: ________________________________
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2745FEFD-B906-4CE2-A90B-134D49221763

DOUGLAS SLOAN
3/29/2023
City Attorney
RAMCO, General Engineereing Contractors
Emilio Ramirez
Emilio RamirezOwner
3/30/2023
David White
City Manager
3/31/2023
Assistant City Clerk
Nikima Newsome
4/3/2023

5.M.e
Packet Pg. 875 Attachment: RAMCO_Agreement #11354 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) Exhibit A
Scope of Services

1. GENERAL. RAMCO shall provide general contractor services as required by the Facilities Maintenance Division. Work may include, but is not limited to, renovations, remodels, door and window installations, siding repairs, demolition work, framing, interior finishes and wood/beam/joist repairs. Jobs shall be quoted individually and requested as required (no guaranteed usage).

2. APPROVAL OF WORK. RAMCO shall provide a written proposal with pricing for approval for all as needed jobs requested by Facilities Maintenance staff. All work under this contract must be authorized by either a Facilities Supervisor or Facilities Services Administrator. City staff shall approve all jobs in writing prior to the start of work (generally in the form of an e-mail approval) with the exception of emergency work requested by staff to address a clear and present hazard to the public, City staff, the environment and/or City property. A written proposal or invoice shall be submitted to the City with accurate cost information as soon as is practicable after emergency work approval based on a verbally provided cost estimate.

3. CONTRACTORS LICENSE / REGISTRATION WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS. RAMCO shall maintain a valid a B General Building Contractor License during the term of this agreement. RAMCO shall maintain a valid registration as a Public Works contractor on the Department of Industrial Relations website: http://www.dir.ca.gov/PublicWorks/PublicWorks.html

5. PREVAILING WAGE / CERTIFIED PAYROLL RECORDS. RAMCO shall perform all services under this contract under prevailing wage. Certified payroll records shall be submitted electronically via the State Department of Industrial Relations’ electronic Certified Payroll Reporting (eCPR) system, and if requested, to Facilities Maintenance staff.

6. WASTE MATERIALS DISPOSAL. RAMCO shall remove any hazardous waste materials generated by work performed under this contract per Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations. It is RAMCO’s sole responsibility to ensure that all hazardous waste materials are either recycled safely and effectively or treated and disposed of in landfills or incinerators per EPA guidelines.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 2745FEFD-B906-4CE2-A90B-134D49221763

5.M.e
Packet Pg. 876 Attachment: RAMCO_Agreement #11354 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) Exhibit B
Budget
I. Labor Rates. Jobs shall be quoted individually with specifications provided by Facilities Maintenance staff using the labor rates noted below (per Bid 4432):

Contract Term Regular Labor Rate (per hour) Overtime Labor Rate (per hour)
Year 1 $72.00 $98.50
Year 2 $73.44 $100.47
Extension Term Regular Labor Rate (per hour) Overtime Labor Rate (per hour)
Year 3 $74.91 $102.48
Year 4 $76.41 $104.53
Year 5 $77.94 $106.62
II. Additional Pricing.

2.1.1. Material = cost + 10%

2.1.2. No charge for retests

2.1.3. Rates for equipment, materials and reimburseables shall be indicated on individual job proposals.

III. Contract Term. The City will compensate RAMCO for the services performed in an amount not to exceed $900,000.

IV. Extension Term(s). In the event the City exercises the (1) additional (3) year renewal option, the total amount of the Contract Term and Extension Term(s) shall not exceed $2,250,000.

V. Invoices. RAMCO shall invoice the City per job under Net 30 terms.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 2745FEFD-B906-4CE2-A90B-134D49221763

5.M.e
Packet Pg. 877 Attachment: RAMCO_Agreement #11354 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) Exhibit C
Insurance Requirements
Contractual Services Agreement Insurance Requirements
Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property that may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors.

Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

1. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an “occurrence” basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal and advertising injury, with limits of no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (Insurance Services Office Form CG 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

Other Insurance Provisions

5.M.e
Packet Pg. 878 Attachment: RAMCO_Agreement #11354 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) behalf of Contractor including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. CGL coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Contractor’s insurance (at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Form CG 20 10 11 85, or if not available, through the addition of both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38 and CG 20 37). b. Primary Coverage: For any claims related to this Agreement, the Contractor’s insurance shall be primary coverage as least as broad as Insurance Services Office Form CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City of Santa Monica, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City of Santa Monica, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be in excess of the Contractor’s insurance and shall not contribute with it. c. Notice of Cancellation: Each insurance policy required herein shall state that coverage shall not be cancelled except after notice has been given to the City of Santa Monica.
d. Waiver of Subrogation: Contractor hereby grants to the City of Santa Monica a waiver of any right of subrogation which any insurer of said Contractor may acquire against the City of Santa Monica by virtue of payment of any loss. Contractor agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City of Santa Monica has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.

Verification of Coverage
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2745FEFD-B906-4CE2-A90B-134D49221763

5.M.e
Packet Pg. 879 Attachment: RAMCO_Agreement #11354 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) Contractor shall furnish the City of Santa Monica with original certificates and amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage provided by this clause). All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City of Santa Monica before work commences. However, failure to obtain required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Contractor’s obligation to provide them.

The City of Santa Monica reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including the endorsements required herein, at any time.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 2745FEFD-B906-4CE2-A90B-134D49221763

5.M.e
Packet Pg. 880 Attachment: RAMCO_Agreement #11354 (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification)

5.M.f
Packet Pg. 881 Attachment: Oaks Initiative Form - Bayview Construction (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) City of Santa Monica Levine Act Disclosure Form

CITY OF SANTA MONICA

A list of Santa Monica Elected Officials and members of boards and commissions can be found at the following links. The party making this certification is responsible for determining whether a recipient of a political contribution is a City Officer prior to completing this form.
https://www.smgov.net/departments/council/
https://www.santamonica.gov/departments/rent-control
Have you, your company, or any agent on behalf of you or your company, made any political contributions of more than $250 to any City Officer in the twelve months preceding the date of the submission of your application or proposal? ____YES ____ NO
Name of Councilmember or City Officer: _________________________________

5.M.g
Packet Pg. 882 Attachment: Levine Act Disclosure Form - Bayview Construction [Revision 1] (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) City of Santa Monica Levine Act Disclosure Form
Name of Contributor: _________________________________________________ Date(s) of Contribution(s): ____________________________________________ Amount(s) ________________________________________________________ Please specify below and/or add additional sheet(s) to identify additional Councilmembers or City Officers to whom you and/or your agents made campaign contributions.

I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.

Signed: ____________________________ Date: ____________________ Print Name: _________________________ Title: _____________________ Company: __________________________
Additional Disclosures:

Please note this form is a public record and subject to a California Public Records Act request.

5.M.g
Packet Pg. 883 Attachment: Levine Act Disclosure Form - Bayview Construction [Revision 1] (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification)

5.M.h
Packet Pg. 884 Attachment: Oaks Initiative Form - RAMCO (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification)

5.M.i
Packet Pg. 885 Attachment: Levine Act Disclosure Form - RAMCO (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification)

5.M.i
Packet Pg. 886 Attachment: Levine Act Disclosure Form - RAMCO (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification)

CITY OF SANTA MONICA

OAKS INITIATIVE NOTICE

NOTICE TO APPLICANTS, BIDDERS, PROPOSERS

AND OTHERS SEEKING DISCRETIONARY PERMITS, CONTRACTS,

This information is required by City Charter Article XXII—Taxpayer Protection.

It prohibits a public official from receiving, and a person or entity from conferring, specified personal benefits or campaign advantages from a person or entity after theofficial votes, or otherwise takes official action, to award a “public benefit” to that person or entity. The prohibition applies within and outside of the geographical boundaries of SantaMonica.

Examples of a “public benefit” include public contracts to provide goods or services worth more than $25,000 or a land use approval worth more than $25,000 over a 12- month period.

In order to facilitate compliance with the requirements of the Oaks Initiative, theCity compiles and maintains certain information. That information includes the name of any personorpersons whois seeking a “publicbenefit.” If the“public benefit” is sought by an entity, ratherthan an individual person, the information includes the nameof everyperson who is: (a) trustee, (b) director, (c) partner, (d) officer, or has (e) more than a ten percent interest in the entity. Therefore, if you are seeking a “public benefit” covered by the Oaks Initiative, you must supply that information on the Oaks Initiative Disclosure Form. This information must be updated and supplied every 12 months.

5.M.j
Packet Pg. 887 Attachment: Oaks Initiative Form - Olympos Construction (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification)

CITY OF SANTA MONICA

Public benefits include:

1. Personal services contracts in excess of $25,000 over any 12-monthperiod;

2. Sale of material, equipment or supplies to the City in excess of $25,000 over a 12- month period;

3. Purchase, sale or lease of real property to or from the City in excess of $25,000 over a 12- month period;

4. Non-competitive franchise awards with gross revenue of $50,000 or more inany 12-month period;

5. Land use variance, special use permit, or other exception to an established land use plan, where the decision has a value in excess of $25,000;

6. Tax “abatement, exception, or benefit” of a value in excess of $5,000 in any 12- month period; or

7. Payment of “cash or specie” of a net value to the recipient of $10,000 in any 12- month period.

Name(s) of persons or entities receiving public benefit:

Name(s) of trustees, directors, partners, and officers:

Name(s) of persons with more than a 10% equity, participation, or revenue interest:

Prepared by: Title:

Signature: Date:

Email: Phone:

Permit #
FOR CITY USE ONLY:

Bid/PO/Contract #

5.M.j
Packet Pg. 888 Attachment: Oaks Initiative Form - Olympos Construction (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) City of Santa Monica Levine Act Disclosure Form

CITY OF SANTA MONICA

A list of Santa Monica Elected Officials and members of boards and commissions can be found at the following links. The party making this certification is responsible for determining whether a recipient of a political contribution is a City Officer prior to completing this form.
https://www.smgov.net/departments/council/
https://www.santamonica.gov/departments/rent-control
https://www.smgov.net/boards
Have you, your company, or any agent on behalf of you or your company, made any political contributions of more than $250 to any City Officer in the twelve months preceding the date of the submission of your application or proposal? ____YES ____ NO
Name of Councilmember or City Officer: _________________________________

5.M.k
Packet Pg. 889 Attachment: Levine Act Disclosure Form - Olympos Construction [Revision 1] (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) City of Santa Monica Levine Act Disclosure Form
Name of Contributor: _________________________________________________ Date(s) of Contribution(s): ____________________________________________ Amount(s) ________________________________________________________ Please specify below and/or add additional sheet(s) to identify additional Councilmembers or City Officers to whom you and/or your agents made campaign contributions.

I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.

Signed: ____________________________ Date: ____________________ Print Name: _________________________ Title: _____________________ Company: __________________________
Additional Disclosures:

Please note this form is a public record and subject to a California Public Records Act request.

5.M.k
Packet Pg. 890 Attachment: Levine Act Disclosure Form - Olympos Construction [Revision 1] (6520 : General Contractor Services Modification) City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: August 27, 2024
Agenda Item: 5.N
1 of 1
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Douglas Sloan, City Attorney, City Attorney's Office, Administration Subject: Second Reading and Adoption of an Ordinance Repealing Santa Monica Municipal Code (SMMC) Chapter 3.23 and Amending SMMC Chapter 3.22 to Establish a Permanent Shared Mobility Device Program
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Ordinance.

Executive Summary
At its meeting on July 23, 2024, the City Council introduced for first reading an Ordinance repealing Santa Monica Municipal Code (SMMC) Chapter 3.23 and amending SMMC Chapter 3.22 to establish a permanent Shared Mobility Device Program. The ordinance is now presented to the City Council for adoption.

Prepared By: Bradley Michaud, Principal Legal Analyst
Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:

A. ORD-Shared Mobility Services 2d

5.N
Packet Pg. 891
1 City Council Meeting: August 27, 2024 Santa Monica, California ORDINANCE NUMBER _________ (CCS)
(City Council Series)

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SANTA MONICA AMENDING SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL CHAPTER 3.22 TO

ESTABISH A LONG-TERM SHARED MOBILITY DEVICE PERMIT PROGRAM, AND REPEALING SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 3.23
WHEREAS, in September 2017, shared electric scooters were introduced by a private operator in Santa Monica; and
WHEREAS, in recognizing that a regulated shared mobility device program could be a valued component of Santa Monica’s local transportation network by promoting alternatives to car trips, in June 2018, the City approved a Shared Mobility Device Pilot Program and associated fees to develop a new area of policy, regulation, operation, and enforcement for shared mobility devices in the City; and WHEREAS, in March 2021, Council adopted a Second Shared Mobility Device Pilot Program, and also directed staff to, upon the conclusion of the Second Shared Mobility Device Pilot Program, shift from a temporary permitting model to a longer-term contracting model with fewer operators for shared mobility services in the City; and WHEREAS, after careful consideration of potential paths forward, City staff recommended a pivot away from contracted shared mobility service to a refreshed and mature long-term permit-based program since the request for proposal process determined that the rationale for shifting toward a contract-based model (centered on the operational stability and efficiency of longer-term commitments from contracted operators, the ability to impose greater affordability constraints on operator fares, and the

5.N.a
Packet Pg. 892 Attachment: ORD-Shared Mobility Services 2d (6540 : Shared Mobility Program - Second Reading) 2 ability to revamp device types and service offerings from operators in a new set of operational agreement) were unlikely to fully materialize, particularly with respect to fare affordability; and
WHEREAS, in the period since Council first directed City staff to select contracted shared mobility service in August 2022, numerous operators have prematurely halted operations within the City, diminished service across other operating regions, declared bankruptcy, and/or halted operations altogether; and
WHEREAS, the City’s shared mobility device program itself continues to offer substantial benefit to the Santa Monica community, including the following: (1) while the ongoing shared mobility pilot is down to two of its initial four operators, and 1,400 of its initial 2,200 permitted devices, ridership in the system – and the mobility benefits that ridership reflects – continues to outpace available alternatives; and (2) in the first quarter of calendar year 2024, the City’s shared mobility program saw a total of 125,736 trips; and
WHEREAS, many of these trips are serving valuable transportation ends, connecting people to jobs, restaurants, and other local destinations; and WHEREAS, the City may continue to benefit from shared mobility services by converting the Second Shared Mobility Device Pilot Program into a long-term permitting program, adopting the following amendments, and updating the administrative regulations.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Chapter 3.22 of the Santa Monica Municipal Code is hereby amended

5.N.a
Packet Pg. 893 Attachment: ORD-Shared Mobility Services 2d (6540 : Shared Mobility Program - Second Reading) 3 as follows:

Chapter 22. SHARED MOBILITY DEVICE PROGRAM
§ 3.22.010. Purpose.

Consistent with the City's goals of enhancing mobility and access, easing traffic congestion, and promoting sustainability, this Chapter creates a program to facilitate the use of shared mobility devices while ensuring the protection of public health and safety, including the safety of the public traveling by foot, bicycle, or vehicle on public sidewalks, streets, and other public rights-of-way. The program also seeks to recover the costs to the City of overseeing and enforcing the operation and regulation of a shared mobility device program.
§ 3.22.020. Definitions.
"Abandon" shall mean leaving an item unattended for any length of time. "Director" shall mean the Director of Transportation or designee. "Mobility officer" shall mean the City's mobility manager or designee. "Operator" shall mean any person or business entity selected by the City to participate in the second shared mobility device pilot program and in good standing with the City, or any person or business entity selected by the City to participate in the long-term shared mobility device program pursuant to this Chapter.
"Public area" shall mean any outdoor area that is open to the public for public use, whether owned or operated by the City or a private party. "Public right-of-way" shall mean any public alley, parkway, public transportation path, roadway, sidewalk, or street that is owned, granted by easement, operated, or controlled by the City.

5.N.a
Packet Pg. 894 Attachment: ORD-Shared Mobility Services 2d (6540 : Shared Mobility Program - Second Reading) 4 "Shared mobility device" shall mean any transportation device by which a person can be propelled, moved or drawn, that is displayed, offered or placed for rent in any public area or public right-of-way, except that a "shared mobility device" does not include any device being vended or made available for rent exclusively from a vehicle pursuant to a valid City vending permit; a car share vehicle, as defined by Chapter 3.06 of this Code; a moped, as defined by California Vehicle Code Section 406; a device authorized by the City bike share system pursuant to Chapter 3.20 of this Code; a taxicab as regulated in Chapter 6.49 of this Code; a device operated by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority; or any other device excluded pursuant to administrative regulations.
§ 3.22.025. Administrative regulations.
(a) The Director may adopt administrative regulations to implement the provisions of this Chapter, including, but not limited to, permit application procedures and permit standards, which may include regulations relating to lawful conduct, public safety, data sharing, data privacy, and/or the timely removal of hazards. (b) No person shall fail to comply with the City's administrative regulations. Any violation of any administrative regulation issued pursuant to this Section shall constitute a violation of this Code and shall subject the violator to the penalties set forth in this Chapter.
§ 3.22.030. Prohibited conduct.

Notwithstanding any other provision of this Code, no person shall:
(a) Display, offer or make available for rent any shared mobility device within the City, unless the person has first obtained: (1) a valid shared mobility operator permit

5.N.a
Packet Pg. 895 Attachment: ORD-Shared Mobility Services 2d (6540 : Shared Mobility Program - Second Reading) 5 issued in accordance with this Chapter: and (2) a business license issued in accordance with Chapter 6.04 of this Code;
(b) Abandon a shared mobility device not authorized by this Chapter in the public rightof-way or a public area in such a way that the device is available for rent; or (c) Abandon a shared mobility device in the public right-of-way or a public area in a manner that: (1) obstructs travel upon or blocks access to a public right-of-way; (2) poses an immediate public safety hazard; or (3) is otherwise prohibited by applicable laws or administrative regulations.
§ 3.22.040. Maximum number of shared mobility operator permits and shared mobility devices permitted.
(a) The Mobility Officer shall issue up to four shared mobility operator permits authorizing the deployment of one or more shared mobility devices within the City.

No shared mobility operator permits shall be issued to any operator that proposes to deploy any shared mobility device that is exclusively powered by the human body or powered by combustion engine.
(b) The Mobility Officer shall establish the number of shared mobility devices whose deployment within the City is authorized under each shared mobility operator permit. No more than on a weekly basis or within fourteen days following any City Council action adjusting the maximum number of permitted operators or devices pursuant to subsection (d) of this section, the Mobility Officer may adjust the maximum number of devices authorized by each shared mobility operator permit.

In making determinations regarding the maximum number of authorized devices, the Mobility Officer shall take into consideration market needs, the total number of

5.N.a
Packet Pg. 896 Attachment: ORD-Shared Mobility Services 2d (6540 : Shared Mobility Program - Second Reading) 6 devices and the total number of devices of any particular type deployed in the City, device utilization, and any other criteria set forth in administrative regulations. The Mobility Officer shall first publish his or her tentative adjustment decision under this Section, along with reasons supporting the decision, and solicit comments prior to making a final determination. The Mobility Officer's final determinations under this Section shall constitute the final decision of the City and are not subject to further administrative review. No person shall fail to comply with the Mobility Officer's established device limitations.
(c) No operator shall be granted authorization for less than fifty shared mobility devices of one type.
(d) At any time, in the City Council's discretion, the City Council may reassess the number of shared mobility operator permits authorized for issuance. The City Council, in its discretion, may determine by resolution that the number of shared mobility operator permits or the number of total authorized devices should be reduced or increased.
§ 3.22.050. Shared mobility operator permit application procedure, fees and requirements.
(a) Any person seeking to obtain a shared mobility operator permit shall submit a written application, signed under penalty of perjury, using the form designated by the Mobility Officer for that purpose.
(b) The City Council may establish permit fees and charges by resolution, which shall:
(1) Defray the City's costs in administering and enforcing the provisions of this Chapter; and

5.N.a
Packet Pg. 897 Attachment: ORD-Shared Mobility Services 2d (6540 : Shared Mobility Program - Second Reading) 7 (2) Reflect charges associated with use of public property pursuant to this Chapter.
(c) The Mobility Officer shall specify the information that must be provided in connection with an application and the form in which the information is to be provided. The application shall contain, at a minimum, the following information:
(1) The name and business address of each person or entity that: (i) has more than a ten percent equity, participation, or revenue interest in the applicant; or (ii) is a trustee, director, partner, or officer of that entity or of another entity that owns or controls the applicant, except persons serving in those capacities as volunteers, without compensation, for organizations exempt from income taxes under Section 501(c) (3), (4), or (6) of the Internal Revenue Code;
(2) The name and business address of any parent or subsidiary of the applicant, namely, any other business entity owning or controlling the applicant in whole or in part, or owned or controlled in whole or in part by the applicant, and a statement describing the nature of any such parent or subsidiary business entity;
(3) Information sufficient to show that the applicant is financially, technically, and legally qualified to operate and maintain a shared mobility device system;
(4) A description of the proposed plan of operation, including, at a minimum, a detailed description of:
(A) The applicant's current operations as a shared mobility device

5.N.a
Packet Pg. 898 Attachment: ORD-Shared Mobility Services 2d (6540 : Shared Mobility Program - Second Reading) 8 provider in the City and other jurisdictions;
(B) The applicant's proposed operations in the City including the maximum numbers and types of shared mobility devices anticipated to be deployed under the permit program, the plan for balancing deployment of shared mobility devices for Citywide coverage, the plan for shared mobility device maintenance, levels of staff for operations and administration, and the plan for customer service; (C) The applicant's regulatory compliance program;
(D) The applicant's history of, intent to, and ability to comply with state and local law;
(E) The applicant's plans to implement safety programs, including, for example, programs by which the applicant will receive information about and notify users of inappropriate use, encourage users to use appropriate safety devices such as helmets, and discourage users from leaving devices in locations that create hazards in the public right-of-way for persons with disabilities and others;
(F) The applicant's plans to educate users of shared mobility devices about applicable California Vehicle Code provisions and other applicable laws, regulations, and guidelines;
(G) The applicant's plans to comply with applicable Federal, State, and local data privacy laws and otherwise to protect the privacy of personal information provided by users and to provide the City with data necessary for the City to ensure accessibility and availability of

5.N.a
Packet Pg. 899 Attachment: ORD-Shared Mobility Services 2d (6540 : Shared Mobility Program - Second Reading) 9 the public right-of-way and other public space for shared use by all, and protect the health, welfare, and safety of the public; (H) The applicant's plans for encouraging use of shared mobility devices as a substitute for trips by car and as a linkage to existing public mass transit systems; and
(I) The applicant's plans for complying with any other requirements set forth by the administrative regulations.
(5) Expect to the extent specifically requested by an applicant, all applications shall be treated as public records pursuant to the California Public Records Act and shall be distributed to all applicants in the event of any appeal by any applicant. If an applicant believes that any portions of an application should be exempt from treatment as a public record and distribution to other applicants, the applicant shall specifically designate those portions and, with respect to each such portion, provide a written explanation of the reasons for the designation. § 3.22.060. Shared mobility operator selection.
(a) The shared mobility operator selection committee shall be established by the Mobility Officer. The committee shall consist of City staff with appropriate knowledge and experience, as further set forth in the administrative regulations. (b) The committee shall review all applications and make written recommendations to the Mobility Officer based on a ranking of each qualified applicant in accordance with objective criteria set forth by this Chapter and the administrative regulations. (c) Each qualified applicant shall be evaluated based upon objective criteria including:
experience; proposed operations plan; financial wherewithal and stability;

5.N.a
Packet Pg. 900 Attachment: ORD-Shared Mobility Services 2d (6540 : Shared Mobility Program - Second Reading) 10 adequacy of insurance; ability to begin operations in a timely manner; public education strategies; willingness to permit application materials to be treated as public record and made available to the public and other applicants; relevant record of the applicant's or officers', owners' or principals' violations of Federal, State or local law, or rules and regulations; quality, durability and safety record of proposed devices; proposed public right-of-way management and safety plan; and any other objective criteria established by the administrative regulations. (d) Each applicant shall be provided an opportunity to submit written comments or objections to the committee's recommendations.
(e) The Mobility Officer shall set forth, in writing, the reasons supporting his or her determinations. The Mobility Officer may request additional information from City staff, any applicant, or any other source that would assist in determining the final qualifications and rankings.
(f) The Mobility Officer shall grant a shared mobility device operator permit to the highest ranking applicants, depending on the number of available openings for operators. Should applicants among the highest ranks receive the same score, a lottery shall be used to establish the final rankings for any applicants that achieved the same score.
(g) The Mobility Officer shall, on a date determined by the Mobility Officer, post on the City's website, and send to all applicants by email notice of the posting with a link to the City's website, all of the following: the ranking determinations as to all applicants, the determination of the highest ranked applicants to whom shared mobility device operator permits will be issued, the written reasons supporting the

5.N.a
Packet Pg. 901 Attachment: ORD-Shared Mobility Services 2d (6540 : Shared Mobility Program - Second Reading) 11 Mobility Officer's determinations, and all portions of all applications other than those portions that applicants have specifically designated with written reasons as exempt from treatment as public records and distribution to the other applicants. (h) No later than fourteen calendar days after the date on which the Mobility Officer posts and distributes notice of the Mobility Officer's determinations, an applicant may file an appeal of the Mobility Officer's determinations, with respect to that applicant only, to the Director. The administrative regulations shall contain the process for appeal. In connection with any appeal, no applicant shall be entitled to receive the application materials submitted by any other applicant that the other applicant has designated with written reasons as exempt from treatment as a public record and distribution to the other applicants. The issuance of any shared mobility device operator permits shall be stayed until the Director has issued his or her final determinations.
(i) In the event of an appeal by any applicant, the Director shall review the Mobility Officer's determinations in their totality de novo and, no later than twenty-eight calendar days after the date on which the Mobility Officer posts and distributes notice of the Mobility Officers determinations, the Director shall either confirm the Mobility Officer's determinations or render his or her own determinations of applicant ranking and of the applicants to whom mobility device operator permits will be issued. The Director shall set forth, in writing, the reasons supporting his or her final determinations.
(j) The Director's determinations under this Section shall constitute the final decision of the City and shall not be subject to further administrative review.

5.N.a
Packet Pg. 902 Attachment: ORD-Shared Mobility Services 2d (6540 : Shared Mobility Program - Second Reading) 12 (k) The Mobility Officer may impose, as part of any shared mobility operator permit issued, any and all conditions that are necessary to effectuate the purposes of this Chapter, mitigate traffic impacts, ensure accessibility of the public right-of-way and availability of public space for shared use by all, or protect the health, welfare, and safety of the public. No person shall fail to comply with such permit conditions. (Added by Ord. No. 2630CCS § 2, adopted 2/11/20)
§ 3.22.070. Limitations on City liability.

To the fullest extent permitted by law, the City shall not assume any liability whatsoever with respect to having issued a shared mobility operator permit or otherwise approving the operation of any shared mobility device. As a condition to the issuance of any shared mobility operator permit, the applicant shall be required to meet all of the following conditions:
(a) The applicant must execute an agreement, in a form approved by the City Attorney, agreeing to indemnify, defend (at applicant's sole cost and expense), and hold harmless the City, and its council, council members, boards, board members, commissions, commission members, task forces, task force members, officers, officials, employees, representatives, volunteers, and agents from any and all claims, losses, damages, injuries, or liabilities which arise out of, or which are in any way related to, the City's issuance of or decision to approve a shared mobility operator permit; the process used by the City in making its decision to approve a shared mobility operator permit; the operation and use of any shared mobility device deployed by any operator who has received a shared mobility operator permit; the classification by the operator of any individuals or entities performing

5.N.a
Packet Pg. 903 Attachment: ORD-Shared Mobility Services 2d (6540 : Shared Mobility Program - Second Reading) 13 services for the operator as employees or contractors; or the alleged violation of any Federal, State or local laws by the applicant or any of its officers, managers, employees, contractors, or agents.
(b) Maintain insurance at coverage limits, and with conditions thereon determined necessary and appropriate from time to time, as determined by the City's Risk Manager and name the City of Santa Monica as additional insured. The applicant's insurance policy shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be cancelled except after thirty days prior written notice by certified mail has been given to the City. If any insurance policy issued to a permittee is cancelled for any reason, the permit issued under this Chapter is automatically suspended. In order to reinstate the permit, the permittee shall provide a new certificate and policy of insurance to the City.
(c) Reimburse the City for all costs and expenses, including, but not limited to, attorney fees and costs, which it may be required to pay as a result of any legal challenge arising out of or in any way related to any claim, loss, damage, injury, or liability as to which the applicant has an obligation to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City pursuant to subsection (a) above. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such legal challenge, but such participation shall not relieve any of the obligations imposed hereunder.
§ 3.22.080. Grounds for revocation, suspension or denial.

A shared mobility operator permit may be revoked, suspended, or denied by the Director based upon any of the following grounds:

5.N.a
Packet Pg. 904 Attachment: ORD-Shared Mobility Services 2d (6540 : Shared Mobility Program - Second Reading) 14 (a) An applicant or operator, including its employees, managers, officers, principals, directors, owners, contractors, representatives, or agents:
(1) Making one or more false or misleading statements, or material omissions on the permit application, during the application process, or during the permit program;
(2) Failing to provide information requested or required by the City; (3) Operating or proposing to operate in a manner that endangers public health or safety; or
(4) Failing to comply with any requirement imposed by the provisions of this Code (or successor provision or provisions) including any rule, regulation, condition or standard promulgated pursuant to this Chapter (or successor provision or provisions), or any term or condition imposed on the shared mobility operator permit, or any provision of State or Federal law. (b) Conviction of the operator, to include any of its officers, principals, directors, or owners, of a criminal offense that is substantially related to the qualifications, functions or duties of the shared mobility business or profession, including, but not limited to, any criminal conviction involving a violent or serious felony, fraud, deceit, or embezzlement.
§ 3.22.090. Program term.

Permits issued pursuant to this Chapter shall take effect immediately, and shall remain valid unless revoked or suspended pursuant to Section 3.22.080 of this Chapter. § 3.22.100. Impoundment of devices.
(a) A shared mobility device that is displayed, offered, or made available for rent, or

5.N.a
Packet Pg. 905 Attachment: ORD-Shared Mobility Services 2d (6540 : Shared Mobility Program - Second Reading) 15 abandoned, in the public right-of-way or a public area in violation of Section 3.22.030 shall be subject to immediate impoundment by the City. (b) The City Council may adopt impound fees by Resolution, which shall reflect the City's enforcement, investigation, storage, and impound costs. (c) No person shall retrieve any impounded shared mobility device except upon demonstrating proper proof of ownership of the device and payment of applicable impound fees.
§ 3.22.110. Enforcement.
(a) Any person who violates any provision of this Chapter, including any permit condition, shall be guilty of an infraction, which shall be punishable by a fine not exceeding two hundred fifty dollars, or a misdemeanor, which shall be punishable by a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars per violation or by imprisonment in the County Jail for a period not exceeding six months or by both such fine and imprisonment.
(b) Any person who violates any provision of this Chapter, including any permit condition, shall be subject to administrative fines and administrative penalties pursuant to Chapter 1.09 and Chapter 1.10 of this Code. (c) Any person convicted of violating this Chapter in a criminal case, or found to be in violation of this Chapter in a civil or administrative case brought by a law enforcement agency, shall be ordered to reimburse the City and other participating law enforcement agencies their full investigative costs.

SECTION 2. Chapter 3.23 of the Santa Monica Municipal Code is hereby repealed in its entirety.

5.N.a
Packet Pg. 906 Attachment: ORD-Shared Mobility Services 2d (6540 : Shared Mobility Program - Second Reading) 16 SECTION 3. Any provision of the Santa Monica Municipal Code or appendices thereto inconsistent with the provisions of this Ordinance, to the extent of such inconsistencies and no further, is hereby repealed or modified to that extent necessary to effect the provisions of this Ordinance.

SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of the ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 5. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall attest to the passage of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall cause the same to be published once in the official newspaper within 15 days after its adoption. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty days after adoption.

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________
Douglas Sloan, City Attorney

5.N.a
Packet Pg. 907 Attachment: ORD-Shared Mobility Services 2d (6540 : Shared Mobility Program - Second Reading) City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: August 27, 2024
Agenda Item: 5.O
1 of 4
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Feroz Merchhiya, Chief Information Officer, Information Services Department Subject: Award Sole Source Purchase Order to vCloud Technologies, Inc. for Proofpoint's Email Security Solution
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt a finding of no possibility of significant effect pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines;

2. Authorize the Procurement Manager to issue a purchase order with vCloud Tech Inc. for Proofpoint’s Email Security Solution for the Information Services Department in an amount not to exceed $52,046 for an initial five-month term, with two (2) additional one-year renewal options to extend on the same terms and conditions for a total amount not to exceed $316,957 (including a $28,815 contingency) with future year funding contingent on Council budget approval.

This recommended authorization is made as an exception to the competitive bidding process pursuant to Section 2.24.250(c).

Summary
Ensuring the security and integrity of email and technology systems is critical to the delivery of City services and operations. Proofpoint’s Email Security solution, available for purchase through vCloud Tech Inc. (vCloud), provides critical protection against email-based threats such as phishing, malware, and business email compromise (BEC).

Procuring Proofpoint’s Email Security solution will ensure the City remains secure and resilient against emerging email threats. Staff seeks City Council approval to authorize the Procurement Manager to issue a purchase order with vCloud for Proofpoint’s Email Security in the amount not to exceed $52,046 for an initial five-month term, with two (2) additional one-year renewal options each in an amount not to exceed $118,048, to

5.O
Packet Pg. 908
2 of 4
extend on the same terms and conditions for a total amount not to exceed $316,957, which includes a 10% contingency.

Discussion
Since 2019, the City of Santa Monica has relied on Proofpoint’s Email Security to secure its inbound, outbound, and internal emails. As a leading email security solution, Proofpoint’s Email Security offers unique insights into email-based threats and proactively implements protective measures as new threats emerge. Email is one of the most popular vectors for cyberattacks. Without a robust email security solution in place, the City would be vulnerable to a myriad of cyber threats.

The City has successfully and responsibly protected itself with other Proofpoint products purchased through vCloud in the past. On December 12, 2023, City Council awarded Bid #4471 to vCloud to provide Proofpoint's Intelligent Classification and Protection, Enterprise Data Loss Prevention, and Web Security solutions to monitor and safeguard the City’s data stored with cloud-based providers, strengthen identity management, and provide greater cybersecurity risk prioritization to aid in cyberattack prevention.

Proofpoint’s Email Security has demonstrated its effectiveness by intercepting emails containing unknown malware or links to new phishing sites before they reached City employees. In 2024, from April-July, more than half of all incoming emails were blocked as threats, significantly reducing the City’s exposure to cyber risks. Only a fraction of emails were ultimately delivered, underscoring the critical role that Proofpoint’s Email Security plays in maintaining the City’s digital security.

Switching to a new email security solution could disrupt current workflows and require time for integration and adaptation. By continuing with Proofpoint’s Email Security, the City can maintain consistent security measures without interruptions to email operations. Transitioning to a new solution could also incur significant costs, including the purchase of new licenses, implementation fees, and additional training for staff.

Continuing with Proofpoint’s Email Security avoids these expenses and leverages existing investments in the current system. Additionally, City staff are already familiar

5.O
Packet Pg. 909
3 of 4
with Proofpoint’s interface and functionality, minimizing the need for extensive retraining and ensuring a smooth continuation of operations.

Proofpoint’s Email Security solution aligns with the City’s commitment to protecting its digital assets. This initiative supports the goal of minimizing cyber threats and ensuring the safety and security of City communications.

Vendor Selection
Exception to Competitive Bidding
Staff recommends vCloud Tech Inc. (vCloud) to provide Proofpoint’s Email Security solution as an exception to competitive bidding per Muni Code 2.24.250 (c). The National Association of State Procurement Officials (NASPO) conducted a competitive bidding process awarding vCloud as an authorized reseller. Under the State of California’ Participating Addendum, the City of Santa Monica is eligible to piggyback on the NASPO Master Contract Number: AR2472, Contract Number: 7-17-70-40-05. The City of Santa Monica intends to utilize this agreement, which not only ensures competitive pricing but also aligns closely with the City’s requirements for an email protection solution.
c. competitive procedures were followed by a governmental agency, federal, state, county, city, joint powers agency, special district, or cooperative purchasing agency and the goods or services are supplied to the City at the same or better price;
Environmental Review
The proposed agreement with vCloud to provide Proofpoint Email Security software solution is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that CEQA does not apply, “where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment.” The email security solution is programmatic in nature and would not result in adverse physical effects on the environment, and so therefore, is exempt from CEQA.

Financial Impacts and Budget Actions

5.O
Packet Pg. 910
4 of 4
Staff seeks authority to approve available funding from the General Fund to authorize a purchase order with vCloud Tech Inc. for Proofpoint Email Security solution.

Agreement Request
FY 2024-25 Request
Amount Future Years Amount Account Number(s)
Total
Contract
Amount
$52,046 $264,911 01140001.529230 $316,957
Future year funding is contingent on Council budget approval.

Prepared By: Keenan McCardle, Principal Information Security Analyst Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:

A. Staff Report Item 5.J 12.13.2023 vCloud Proofpoint Cybersecurity Software B. vCloud - FY23-24_Oaks_Initiative_Disclosure_Form
C. Levine Act Disclosure Form

5.O
Packet Pg. 911
City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: December 12, 2023
Agenda Item: 5.J
1 of 5
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Christopher Smith, Deputy City Manager, Information Services Department Subject: Accept Bid with vCloud Tech for Proofpoint Cybersecurity Software Licenses Recommended Action
Staff Recommends that the City Council

1. Award Bid #4471 to vCloud Tech to provide Proofpoint's Intelligent Classification and Protection, Enterprise Data Loss Prevention, and Web Security solutions, associated licensing, and services as required by the Information Services Department;

2. Authorize the Procurement Manager to issue a purchase order with vCloud Tech for Proofpoint's Intelligent Classification and Protection, Enterprise Data Loss Prevention, and Web Security solutions, associated licensing, and services in the amount not to exceed $506,826 for an initial two-year term, with one additional one-year renewal option to extend on the same terms and conditions for a total amount not to exceed $799,918, with future year funding contingent on Council budget approval; and

3. Adopt a finding of Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15061(d)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.

Summary
Ensuring the security and integrity of data and technology systems is critical to the delivery of City services and operations. Every function of City business relies on technology in some way. In 2021, the Information Services Department (ISD) was awarded funding totaling $692,153 as a part of the annual U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Federal Emergency Management Agency's Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) grant to be used on cybersecurity program enhancements.

The City again received UASI grant funding in the amount of $370,000 in the 2022 grant cycle to support the City’s information security efforts. ISD will utilize the grant funding

5.O.a
Packet Pg. 912 Attachment: Staff Report Item 5.J 12.13.2023 vCloud Proofpoint Cybersecurity Software (6548 : Award Sole Source Purchase Order to vCloud 2 of 5
to issue a purchase order with vCloud Tech to implement solutions from Proofpoint to monitor and safeguard the City’s data stored with cloud-based providers, strengthen identity management, and provide greater cybersecurity risk prioritization to aid in cyberattack prevention.

Discussion
The City of Santa Monica’s Information Services Department manages a technology environment that includes over 300 software systems, 2,000 computers, a data center, several cloud-hosted solutions, a disaster recovery environment, fiber networks connecting City facilities and assets, and public-facing webpages and portals used by City customers. It is vital this technology and the data stored in them is maintained in such a way to provide resilience and to protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the City’s operations.

Selecting Proofpoint’s intelligent classification and protection, data loss prevention, and web security solution is part of ISD’s strategic plan aimed at fortifying the City’s cybersecurity posture. The comprehensive capabilities of Proofpoint’s solution provide robust protection against data breaches and cyber threats. Intelligent Classification and Protection ensure sensitive information is appropriately handled, reducing the risk of data leaks. The data loss prevention features offer an additional layer of defense, preventing unauthorized access and safeguarding critical business data. Coupled with advanced web security measures, Proofpoint’s solution not only mitigates cybersecurity risks but also promotes a secure online environment for City staff and the public.

Ultimately, choosing Proofpoint aligns with City’s commitment to maintaining the highest standards of data security and safeguarding the integrity of City operations.

The City has used Proofpoint information security tools since 2019. The addition of Proofpoint's Intelligent Classification and Protection, Enterprise Data Loss Prevention, and Web Security solutions will integrate with the City's existing information security tools to ensure more secure monitoring and protection of the City's technology and allows ISD staff to address the full spectrum of people-centric data-loss scenarios.

These tools also ensure more secure computing by staff, whether in the office or

5.O.a
Packet Pg. 913 Attachment: Staff Report Item 5.J 12.13.2023 vCloud Proofpoint Cybersecurity Software (6548 : Award Sole Source Purchase Order to vCloud 3 of 5
working remotely and adds additional security to protect sensitive data stored in City systems.

Vendor Selection
Bidder Recommendation
Best Bidder vCloud Tech, Inc.

Evaluation Criteria Price; the ability, capacity and skill of the bidder to perform or provide the materials or services. The City shall have absolute discretion in determining the applicability and weight of the criteria listed above. The City is not required to select the bid with the lowest price.

Municipal Code SMMC 2.24.180
Submittals Received
Vendor Total 3 Year Pricing Vendor Total 3 Year Pricing vCloud Tech $799,918 Wave Strong $821,934
Axelliant LLC $803,150 Smart IT Pros Inc $837,944
Phaeton Solutions LLC $811,475
Bid Data
Date Posted Posted On
Advertise In
(City Charter & SMMC)
Vendors
Downloaded
Date Publicly
Opened
10/18/2023 City's Online
Bidding Site
Santa Monica Daily Press 22 11/17/2023
Best Bidder Justification
Staff recommends vCloud Tech, Inc. as the best bidder to provide Proofpoint's Intelligent Classification and Protection, Enterprise Data Loss Prevention, and Web Security solutions, associated licensing, and services. vCloud Tech offered the best overall pricing for licensing and has successfully provided Proofpoint licensing for the City as well as being a trusted vendor.

Past Council Actions
Meeting Date Description
5/10/2022
(attachment A)
Authorization to accept the 2021 Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) Grant Funds for Homeland Security Projects and enter into a Subrecipient agreement with the City of Los Angeles
Environmental Review
The bid award to provide Proofpoint's Intelligent Classification and Protection, Enterprise Data Loss Prevention, and Web Security solutions, associated licensing, and services is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. The award agreement is covered by the

5.O.a
Packet Pg. 914 Attachment: Staff Report Item 5.J 12.13.2023 vCloud Proofpoint Cybersecurity Software (6548 : Award Sole Source Purchase Order to vCloud 4 of 5
common sense exemption which states that CEQA does not apply, where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment.

Financial Impacts
Staff seeks authority to approve available funding from the Miscellaneous Grants Fund to award a purchase order to vCloud Tech to provide Proofpoint's Intelligent Classification and Protection, Enterprise Data Loss Prevention, and Web Security solutions, associated licensing, and services. Future year funding is contingent on Council budget approval.

5.O.a
Packet Pg. 915 Attachment: Staff Report Item 5.J 12.13.2023 vCloud Proofpoint Cybersecurity Software (6548 : Award Sole Source Purchase Order to vCloud 5 of 5
If future grant funds are not awarded to the City to cover the costs of continuing the subscription beyond this three-year period, staff will seek alternative funding opportunities or discontinue its use of these tools.

Purchase Order Request
FY 2023-24
Request Amount Future Years Amount Account # Total Contract Amount $477,692 $0 20140001.55518F $477,692
$29,134 $293,092 20140001.55518G $322,226
$506,826 $293,092 TOTAL $799,918
Prepared By: Christopher Smith, Deputy City Manager
Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:

A. 2021 Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) Grant Funds for Homeland Security Projects (Web Link)
B. vCloud - FY23-24_Oaks_Initiative_Disclosure_Form

5.O.a
Packet Pg. 916 Attachment: Staff Report Item 5.J 12.13.2023 vCloud Proofpoint Cybersecurity Software (6548 : Award Sole Source Purchase Order to vCloud

CITY OF SANTA MONICA OAKS INITIATIVE DISCLOSURE FORM
In order to facilitate compliance with the requirements of the Oaks Initiative, the City compiles and maintains certain information. That information includes the name of any person or persons who is seeking a “public benefit.” If the “public benefit” is sought by an entity, rather than an individual person, the information includes the name of every person who is: (a) trustee, (b) director, (c) partner, (d) officer, or has (e) more than a ten percent interest in the entity.

Public benefits include:

1. Personal services contracts in excess of $25,000 over any 12-month period;

2. Sale of material, equipment or supplies to the City in excess of $25,000 over a 12- month period;

3. Purchase, sale or lease of real property to or from the City in excess of $25,000 over a 12- month period;

4. Non-competitive franchise awards with gross revenue of $50,000 or more in any 12-month period;

5. Land use variance, special use permit, or other exception to an established land use plan, where the decision has a value in excess of $25,000;

6. Tax “abatement, exception, or benefit” of a value in excess of $5,000 in any 12- month period; or

7. Payment of “cash or specie” of a net value to the recipient of $10,000 in any 12- month period.

Name(s) of persons or entities receiving public benefit:
vCloud Tech Inc.

Name(s) of trustees, directors, partners, and officers:

Muhammad Khan (CEO) 49% Nadia Khan (President) 51%
Name(s) of persons with more than a 10% equity, participation, or revenue interest:

Prepared by: Muhammad Khan Title: CEO
Signature: Date: 11/07/2023
Email: [email protected] Phone: (310) 870-1235
FOR CITY USE ONLY:

Bid/PO/Contract # Permit #
Muhammad Khan (CEO) 49% Nadia Khan (President) 51%

5.O.b
Packet Pg. 917 Attachment: vCloud - FY23-24_Oaks_Initiative_Disclosure_Form (6548 : Award Sole Source Purchase Order to vCloud for Proofpoint's Email City of Santa Monica Levine Act Disclosure Form

CITY OF SANTA MONICA

A list of Santa Monica Elected Officials and members of boards and commissions can be found at the following links. The party making this certification is responsible for determining whether a recipient of a political contribution is a City Officer prior to completing this form.
https://www.smgov.net/departments/council/
https://www.santamonica.gov/departments/rent-control
https://www.smgov.net/boards
Have you, your company, or any agent on behalf of you or your company, made any political contributions of more than $250 to any City Officer in the twelve months preceding the date of the submission of your application or proposal? ____YES ____ NO
Name of Councilmember or City Officer: _________________________________

5.O.c
Packet Pg. 918 Attachment: Levine Act Disclosure Form (6548 : Award Sole Source Purchase Order to vCloud for Proofpoint's Email Security) City of Santa Monica Levine Act Disclosure Form
Name of Contributor: _________________________________________________ Date(s) of Contribution(s): ____________________________________________ Amount(s) ________________________________________________________ Please specify below and/or add additional sheet(s) to identify additional Councilmembers or City Officers to whom you and/or your agents made campaign contributions.

I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.

Signed: ____________________________ Date: ____________________ Print Name: _________________________ Title: _____________________ Company: __________________________
Additional Disclosures:

Please note this form is a public record and subject to a California Public Records Act request.

5.O.c
Packet Pg. 919 Attachment: Levine Act Disclosure Form (6548 : Award Sole Source Purchase Order to vCloud for Proofpoint's Email Security) SANTA MONICA CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
TO: Public
FROM: City Attorney’s Office
RE: Levine Act Disclosure Form
DATE: January 25, 2024
The Levine Act (Government Code 84308) is a California law aimed at preventing “pay to play” practices by prohibiting parties, participants, and their agents in a proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement from contributing more than $250 to an officer of the City during a 12-month period. The prohibition applies to any 12-month period while the proceeding is pending and for 12 months following the date a final decision is rendered in the proceeding.

State law requires a party to a proceeding to disclose any contributions exceeding an aggregate $250 that the party and their agents have made to an officer of the City within the preceding 12 months. The Disclosure Form is intended to assist City officials with recognizing when they have an obligation to disclose and recuse themselves, and to aid parties with their disclosure obligations.

1. To what sort of proceedings is the disclosure form applicable? The Levine Act applies to all discretionary entitlements and contracts, with the exception of labor contracts, personal employment contracts, and contracts that must be awarded to the lowest responsive/responsible bidder. It does not apply to ministerial approvals.

For instance, the Levine Act applies to the following:
• Building and development permits
• Conditional use permits
• Contracts generally (unless an exception applies):
o Contracts for goods, services, professional services
o Real property contracts for purchase, sale, lease
o Contract amendments
o Settlement agreements
o Small contracts, including purchase orders, and zero dollar contracts (no de minimis exception)
• Public street abandonments
• Private development plans
• Professional license revocations
• Rezoning of specific real estate parcels
• Event permits
• Rulemaking procedures affecting a particular industry where only a small number of businesses are affected

5.O.c
Packet Pg. 920 Attachment: Levine Act Disclosure Form (6548 : Award Sole Source Purchase Order to vCloud for Proofpoint's Email Security)

Page 2 ends

• Special district formation proceedings involving the creation of a special use or benefit to the person in the district
• Tentative subdivision and parcel maps
• Zoning variances
• Vacation of a public easement across private property • Pre-applications, such as for General Plan Amendment, considered by the legislative body prior to filing of formal application
• Contracts entered under the City Manager’s Authority
• Closed session items that may result in a contract/settlement agreement approved by Council (real estate or litigation)
It does not apply to:
• Purely ministerial decisions
• General policy decisions or rules where the interests affected are many and diverse
• Ordinances and resolutions (except items like development agreements adopted by ordinance)
• Ballot measures
• Departmental policies
• Council rules
• Contracts awarded to the lowest responsive/responsible bidder (not applicable in Santa Monica)
• Labor contracts and project labor agreements
• Personal employment contracts
• Allocation of resources in the City budget

2. Who is required to disclose?
A “party” to a proceeding is any person who files an application for, or is the subject of, a proceeding. In general, a person or company who applies for a permit, license, or right to use property in a particular way, which requires the City’s discretionary approval, will qualify as a party.

Parties are also required to disclose contributions by their agents. An “agent” is someone who (1) represents a party to a proceeding for compensation; and (2) appears before or otherwise communicates with the City for the purpose of influencing the pending proceeding. This can include law firms, architects, engineers, consultants, and similar entities. Both the individual and their employer or firm are considered “agents.” A party should also disclose contributions of other entities majority owned by the party, as well as contributions of any other entity whose contributions it directs or controls.

3. What must be disclosed?
A party must disclose campaign contributions over $250 made in the prior twelve months.

A “contribution” is anything of value for which the party has not received full consideration, including money, nonmonetary items, payments made for advertising or

5.O.c
Packet Pg. 921 Attachment: Levine Act Disclosure Form (6548 : Award Sole Source Purchase Order to vCloud for Proofpoint's Email Security)

Page 3 ends

other expenses coordinated with a candidate or committee, loans, tickets to political fundraisers, etc.

4. Who is considered an officer of the City?
An “officer” is anyone who may make, participate in making, or attempt to influence a decision in the proceeding or who exercises authority over officers who may do so. This includes elected officials, members of appointed boards and commissions, the City Manager, and any individual who is a candidate for elected office or who has been a candidate in the twelve months prior to the decision. This definition is included on the Disclosure Form.

5. When should the disclosure occur?
The Disclosure Form must be completed (1) by a party to a contract with the City (or that party’s agent) at the time the party submits a response to a Request for Proposal or other competitive solicitation, enters into contract negotiations with the City, or executes a contract with the City, whichever is earliest; or (2) by a party to a license, permit, or other entitlement proceeding before the City at the time the party (or their agent) submits the license, permit, or entitlement application to the City. The party (or their agent) must submit a supplemental form if they make any new reportable contributions while the same contract, license, permit, or other entitlement is being considered. The party (or their agent) must also use the form if they need to correct any previously submitted form.

Parties are solely responsible for completing the form accurately, and could face penalties for failure to do so. The California Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) is the body who enforces violations of the Levine Act. If a party is uncertain about whether they are required to report or combine a contribution, they should consult with their attorney.

Nothing herein constitutes legal advice and individuals are urged to consult with their own attorney regarding the requirements of the law. To the extent there is any inconsistency, the language of the Levine Act and FPPC Regulations govern over this notice. Resources for officers, parties, participants, and agents, are available on the FPPC’s website at https://www.fppc.ca.gov/learn/pay-to-play-limits-and-prohibitions.html

5.O.c
Packet Pg. 922 Attachment: Levine Act Disclosure Form (6548 : Award Sole Source Purchase Order to vCloud for Proofpoint's Email Security) City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: August 27, 2024
Agenda Item: 5.P
1 of 5
To: Mayor and City Council
From: David Martin, Director, Administration
Subject: Adoption of Resolution of Intention to Amend the Municipal Code to Increase the Maximum Allowed Height of Fences, Walls, and Hedges in the Front Setbacks of R2, R3, and R4 Zoning Districts and to Address the Rules for Measuring the Heights of Fences, Walls, and Hedges Located on Top of Retaining Walls
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt a finding of no possibility of significant effect pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.

2. Adopt a Resolution declaring its intention to amend the Municipal Code to increase the maximum allowed height of fences, walls, and hedges in the front setbacks of R2, R3, and R4 zoning districts and to address the rules for measuring the heights of fences, walls, and hedges located on top of retaining walls.

Summary
On June 25, 2024 City Council directed staff, per Item 16-C, to return with amendments to the Municipal Code to allow in the R2, R3, and R4 zoning districts front fence, wall, and hedge heights up to 72 inches in height in the front setback, to address measurements that may include retaining walls. Council also directed staff to suspend enforcement and processing of pending fence, wall, and hedge applications in the R2, R3, and R4 zones until the ordinance becomes effective in R2, R3, and R4 zones for those that would comply with that standard.

On August 7, 2024, the Planning Commission considered and failed to adopt a Resolution of Intention to consider amendments to the Zoning Ordinance to increase

5.P
Packet Pg. 923
2 of 5
the maximum allowed height of fences, walls, and hedges in the front setbacks of R2, R3, and R4 zoning districts to a maximum height of 72 inches and to address the rules for measuring the heights of fences, walls, and hedges located on top of retaining walls.

Pursuant to Santa Monica Municipal Code (SMMC) Section 9.46.030, the City Council can also initiate the Zoning Ordinance text amendment through adoption of a Resolution of Intention. Resolutions of Intention are a required step in the process to provide a formal public notice that amendments to the Zoning Ordinance will be considered at a future meeting. If Council adopts the attached Resolution of Intention, the process still requires that the Planning Commission consider the proposed amendments and make their formal recommendation to the City Council. The Council will then consider the Planning Commission’s recommendation on the proposed amendments at a future hearing.

Discussion
Currently the Zoning Ordinance allows fence, wall, and hedge heights up to 42 inches in the front setback within all zoning districts except the Downtown Community Plan Area with the option to apply for a discretionary height modification should additional height be requested pursuant to Santa Monica Municipal Code (SMMC) Sections

9.21.050(A)(1) and 9.43.050(B).

Pursuant to SMMC Section 9.04.050(D), the height of any fence, wall, or hedge shall be measured from the lowest finished grade adjacent to either side of the fence, wall, or hedge. The height shall be measured in a continuum at each point along the fence, wall, or hedge. In the case of fences, walls, or hedges that are parallel to and within 5 feet of a public sidewalk or other public way, grade shall be the elevation of the closest point on the sidewalk or public way.

The height of a fence that is on top of a retaining wall is measured from the lowest existing grade point within a 3-foot radius of any point on such fence to the highest point of the fence on the highest side of the wall. Any fence or railing required to comply with minimum height in applicable Building Code requirements is permitted.

5.P
Packet Pg. 924
3 of 5
On June 25, 2024, in response to concerns raised related to protecting privacy and private spaces in the City’s R2, R3 and R4 zones due to the development volume in those districts as a result of changes in State law that allows for greater density, Council directed staff to return with amendments to the Municipal Code to increase the maximum height limit of fences, walls, and hedges in the front setbacks of the R2, R3, and R4 zoning districts to a limit of 72 inches. The direction did not include other zoning districts nor the fence, wall, and hedge height limits in side and rear setbacks.

Additionally, Council directed staff to address how retaining walls are measured and potentially explore not including retaining walls towards the measurement of maximum permitted fence, wall, hedge heights.

The Planning Commission did not adopt a Resolution of Intention at their August 7, 2024 meeting. However, pursuant to SMMC Section 9.46.030, Council can also initiate a Zoning Amendment process by adopting the attached resolution.

The attached Resolution of Intention represents the formal commencement of the process for the Planning Commission to consider recommending to the City Council amendments to the Municipal Code to increase the maximum allowed height of fences, walls, and hedges in the front setbacks of R2, R3, and R4 zoning districts to a maximum height of 72 inches and to address the rules for measuring the heights of fences, walls, and hedges located on top of retaining walls. The resolution does not represent any specific recommendations by staff or predict any final decisions by the City Council.

Instead, this resolution signifies the beginning of the formal process of a Zoning Text Amendment which requires that the Planning Commission make a recommendation to the City Council on the proposed changes. The Council will then hold a final public hearing on the proposed amendments. Following approval of the Resolution of Intention, formal Planning Commission consideration of these amendment is tentatively scheduled to occur on September 4, 2024, with City Council consideration to follow.

Past Council Actions
Meeting Date Description
06/25/24 (attachment Request by Councilmember Parra and Mayor Brock to direct

5.P
Packet Pg. 925
4 of 5
B) the City Manager and City Attorney to return with
amendments to the Municipal Code, including a potential interim zoning ordinance, to allow in R2, R3, and R4 zone districts only front fence, wall, and hedge heights to be limited to 72” in height in the front setback, address
measurements that may include retaining walls, and
suspend enforcement and pending applications until the
ordinance becomes effective in R2, R3, and R4 for those that would comply with that standard.

Environmental Status
This Resolution of Intention is the formal initiation of the process to consider permanent amendments to the Zoning Ordinance in accordance with the formal procedures of the SMMC and as such, is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines which states that CEQA does not apply “where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment.” The resolution of intention is a required step that is administrative in nature. Therefore, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment.

Financial Impacts and Budget Actions
There is no immediate financial impact or budget action necessary as a result of the recommended action.

Prepared By: Shira Moch, Associate Planner
Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:

A. CDD-Reso-Resolution of Intention re Fence Wall Hedge Heights 08.27.24 B. City Council Meeting - June 25, 2024 (Web Link)

5.P
Packet Pg. 926
5 of 5
C. Planning Commission Meeting August 7, 2024 (Web Link) D. Written Comments

5.P
Packet Pg. 927
1 City Council Meeting: August 27, 2024 Santa Monica, California RESOLUTION NUMBER _________ (CCS)
(City Council Series)

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SANTA MONICA DIRECTING THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO INITATE AN AMENDMENT TO THE TEXT OF THE CITY’S ZONING ORDINANCE TO INCREASE

THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED HEIGHTS OF FENCES, WALLS AND HEDGES IN THE FRONT SETBACKS OF R2, R3 AND R4 ZONING DISTRICTS AND TO ADDRESS

THE RULES FOR MEASURING THE HEIGHTS OF FENCES, WALLS AND HEDGES

LOCATED ON TOP OF RETAINING WALLS
WHEREAS, the City’s new Zoning Ordinance, Chapters 9.01 through 9.52 of Article 9 of the Santa Monica Municipal Code (“Zoning Ordinance”), became effective on July 24, 2015; and
WHEREAS, currently the Zoning Ordinance, in accordance with Santa Monica Municipal Code (SMMC) Section 9.21.050(A)(1), allows fence, wall, and hedge heights up to 42 inches in the front setback within all zoning districts, with the option to apply for a discretionary height modification should additional height be requested pursuant to SMMC Section 9.43.050(B); and
WHEREAS, SMMC Section 9.04.050(D), provides rules for measurement of any fence, wall, or hedge, including specific rules for measuring fences, walls and hedges located on top of retaining walls; and
WHEREAS, during its Regular Meeting on June 25, 2024, in response to concerns raised related to protecting privacy and private spaces in the City’s R2, R3 and R4 zones due to the development volume in those districts as a result of changes in State law that allows for greater density, the City Council directed staff to return with amendments to the Municipal Code to allow front fence, wall, and hedge heights to be limited to 72 inches in

5.P.a
Packet Pg. 928 Attachment: CDD-Reso-Resolution of Intention re Fence Wall Hedge Heights 08.27.24 [Revision 1] (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate 2 height in the front setback within the R2, R3, and R4 zoning districts and address measurements that include retaining walls.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Pursuant to Santa Monica Municipal Code Section 9.46.030(A), the City Council does hereby direct the Planning Commission to initiate an amendment to the text of the Zoning Ordinance, as set forth in Exhibit A, attached to this Resolution.

SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect.

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________

DOUGLAS SLOAN
City Attorney

5.P.a
Packet Pg. 929 Attachment: CDD-Reso-Resolution of Intention re Fence Wall Hedge Heights 08.27.24 [Revision 1] (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate 3 EXHIBITA
[behind this page]

5.P.a
Packet Pg. 930 Attachment: CDD-Reso-Resolution of Intention re Fence Wall Hedge Heights 08.27.24 [Revision 1] (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate 4 TOPIC DESCRIPTION

SMMC SECTION(S) TO

BE REVIEWED

AND/OR AMENDED

INCLUDE BUT MAY
NOT BE LIMITED TO:

Fences, Walls
and Hedges
Consider possible amendments to:
• Increase fence, wall and hedge heights to 72
inches in front setback in the R2, R3 and R4
Zoning Districts
• Address the rules for measuring the heights of
fences, walls and hedges located on top of
retaining walls

9.04.050, Land Use
Regulations, Measuring
Height

9.21.050, Fences, Walls
and Hedges

9.43.050, Applicability:

Fence, Wall, and Hedge
Height Modifications

9.43.080, Procedures
and Required Findings
for Fence, Wall and
Hedge Height
Modifications

5.P.a
Packet Pg. 931 Attachment: CDD-Reso-Resolution of Intention re Fence Wall Hedge Heights 08.27.24 [Revision 1] (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate 1 David Yakobson
From: Leslie Lambert <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2024 11:30 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Phil Brock; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; [email protected]; Lana Negrete; Gleam Davis; Gleam Davis; Caroline Torosis; Caroline Torosis; Oscar De La Torre; Oscar de la Torre; Jesse Zwick; Jesse Zwick; Suzie Lockwood Cc: Jing Yeo; Tony Kim; David Martin; David White; Nina Fresco Subject: Item 5P

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Brock, Mayor Pro Tem Negrete and Councilmembers:

Please remove Item 5P from the Consent Calendar and direct Planning staff, the SMPD and other relevant City staff to return with security measures that provide alternatives to the proposed six foot fences, walls and hedges on the front property lines in R2,R3 and R4 Districts. I am speaking as a resident but did participate in the August 6 Planning Commission meeting at which this Resolution of Intention was unanimously rejected. I encourage you to read the letter and materials that Commissioner Fresco emailed you today. The insights from the Vallejo Police Department could provide guidance.

My opposition to allowing six foot fences, walls and hedges on the front yard property line is based on the following:

1. It sends the message that Santa Monica is an unsafe community, and that no security alternatives exist other than walling ourselves off from each other. It demonstrates the "broken window" principle by telling people that we are not able to support a thriving, healthy city because of the fear of crime among some of us.

2. It undermines the sense of community among neighbors.

3. It is a sledge hammer approach to dealing with code enforcement issues.

4. It is my understanding that residential intruders generally enter a property from the back if an alley exists. That has been my personal experience.

5. The Planning Commission has been told for years that walled-in properties present a danger to police officers entering a property without knowing what they will encounter in the front yard.

6. It is misguided to consider six foot barriers as a mitigation against density. Frankly, I have no idea how this thinking got traction at all other than "us/them" fears.

Basing the City's urban design standards on the Fort Apache Mode directly contradicts Santa Monica's principles of inclusion, a strong sense of community and identity, and a desirable and welcoming place for people to live, work, and spend leisure time. Please do not proceed with Item 5P.

Thank you for your consideration.

Leslie Lambert
Sunset Park Resident
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 932 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) 1 David Yakobson
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2024 9:02 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Christine Parra; Oscar De La Torre; Phil Brock; [email protected]; Gleam Davis; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick
Cc: Jing Yeo; Tony Kim; David Martin; David White; Suzie Lockwood; Nina Fresco; Nina Fresco
Subject: Fences Walls and Hedges
Attachments: Vallejo CPTED-Handbook-2021.pdf

EXTERNAL
Dear City Council,
Please remove item 5P from the Consent Calendar and revise the ROI to be more broad. Let planners come up with a better safer solution to Santa Monica’s Fence Wall and Hedge issues.

This proposal is trying to solve a compliance problem with an ordinance solution that will make our city less safe, less attractive, and less friendly. Better standards for retaining walls will solve the greater part of compliance problems without the need for costly variances. For the rest, a new, complaint 42” front yard fence on a 50-foot parcel does not have to be very expensive. A very small fund could subsidize many, many people for whom compliance is a hardship. Or let your planning staff and the planning commission come up with other kinds of work arounds.

Furthermore, I don’t understand the need for privacy in front yard setbacks in neighborhoods zoned for multi-unit development where that open space is already shared among multiple tenants. Let’s not do this. Instead we can create an environment where we get to know our neighbors and look out for each other.

Cities all over the world have adopted Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles and put information about it on their public safety websites. The non-profit, International CPTED Association was founded in 1996 to research and develop public policy for crime prevention (https://www.cpted.net/A-brief-history). Today they provide certification programs for architects and law enforcement worldwide. Santa Monica PD officers who do Home Security Assessments on site are trained in CPTED and use CPTED principles when offering recommendations to homeowners about design features that make a home safer against crime.

CPTED principles very clearly and concisely recommend against tall barriers that remove building frontages adjacent from public rights of way from public view. Opaque and semi opaque fences walls and hedges in front yard setbacks adjacent to public sidewalks should not block sightlines to entryways or create shadowy hiding places. People with bad intentions do not want their nefarious activities witnessed. A well-lit yard open to public view and leading to windows and doors with good locks is just too risky for them. It’s a simple principle summed up by the three L’s:

Locks, Lights, and Landscape.

Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 933 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) 2 Pedestrian-safe sidewalks are also impacted. Sidewalks should be visible from as many different vantage points as possible and be well lit at night. Pedestrians are not safe walking unseen between rows of hedges on either side of the road, a condition we are fast approaching on many Santa Monica streets.

An excellent brochure published by the City of Vallejo, California, which I’m told many other California cities have also published a version of, is especially clear because it includes real-life examples and diagrams showing why certain conditions aren't safe and how places look and function safely once the principles are applied. Click here to download or find it attached below. I hope Santa Monica will make its own CPTED brochure sometime soon.

I would argue that FWH heights of six feet in our city doesn’t actually qualify as a legal text amendment according to the findings in 9.46 for amending the zoning ordinance because those heights promote crime and are therefore contrary to the goals of public health, safety, and general welfare.

A highly unusual Planning Commission vote against adoption of the ROI, an unwillingness to even discuss the possibility of allowing front yard fences, walls, and hedges to be 6,’ should send a very strong message to you about the inadvisability of this idea.

Let’s regulate to achieve safe urban design that helps our citizens build community and take care of each other. Please adjust the ROI to be more broad so planners and the Planning Commission can advise you on how to handle this based on the best information available for a better Santa Monica.

Best,
Nina Fresco
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 934 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges)

Crime Prevention Through
Environmental Design
CPTED
• OPPORTUNITY TO REDUCE CRIME
• REDUCE CITIZENS’ FEAR OF CRIME
• ENCOURAGE SOCIAL INTERACTION
• ADDRESS QUALITY OF LIFE CONCERNS
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 935 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Contents
Introduction to CPTED………………………………………………………………………………… 4

1. Natural Surveillance………………………………………………………..…………………. 6

2. Natural Access Control………………………………………………….………….……….. 11

3. Territorial Reinforcement…………………………………………….……….………….... 12

4. Activity Support…………………………………………………………………………………… 15

5. Maintenance………………………………………………………………….………………….. 19
The Broken Window Theory…………………………………………………………………………. 20 Vallejo Program Suggestions ……………………………………………………………… 28 Appendix 1: Landscaping……………………………………………………………………………… 29 Table 1: Suggested Vegetation………………………………………….………….………… 33 Appendix 2: Security Mechanisms………………………………………………………………… 38 Table 1: Community Surveillance Cameras 43
Appendix 3: Lighting for Safety……….……………………………………………………………. 44 Situational Crime Prevention Techniques 57
Table 1: Types of Lighting and Cost Analysis………………………….………………… 58 Table 2: Types of Fixtures…………………………………………….…………………………. 59 Table 3: Types of Directional Lighting……………………………………………………… 60 2 Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 936 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) 3 Purpose
The goal of the CPTED requirements in the Vallejo CPTED Program is to reduce opportunitiesfor crimes that are inherent in the design ofstructures, landscape, and/or in the design of the community/neighborhood.

Disclaimer: CPTED principles and strategies are suggested for the purpose of reducing criminal activity on your property. It does not in any way predict or prevent all crime risks.

Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 937 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Introduction
4 The theory and guidelines of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED), pronounced ‘sep-ted’, were first created in the 1960s; and like everything else, it evolved into what it is today. CPTED is a well-established and well-researched field of crime prevention utilized internationally. It has proven methods that increase the responsible, positive use of property while decreasing the likelihood of criminal behavior.
‘“Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design” (CPTED) is a pro-active crime prevention philosophy based on the theory that proper design and effective use of the built environment can lead to a reduction in crime and the fear of crime, as well as an improvement in the quality of life for the community, and that it aims to reduce or even remove the opportunity for crime to occur in an environment and promote positive interaction with the space by legitimate users;’
The responsibility for reducing crime and the fear of crime should be shared between the police, local governments, local businesses, the voluntary sector, and the local community. This training document is provided on CPTED principles to everyone involved in the urban planning process to ensure that all participants are aware of their roles and responsibilities in relation to preventing crime and reducing feelings of insecurity within the community.’
At its core, CPTED addresses ‘target hardening’. Sometimes a citizen cannot remove a target. However, you can harden the target. Target hardening involves the use of locks, electronic devices, or other hardware that will detect, deny, delay and deter the criminal away from the intended target.
 Detect – By utilizing good security techniques, you can cause the offender to make noise, which will increase the risk of detection, which may persuade them from not committing the crime.
 Deny – By engraving valuables, using security electronic equipment (GPS enabled devices), increased surveillance, or by moving other valuables out of view.  Delay – Many time crimes are committed because of an easy opportunity. By using good crime prevention techniques, you can increase the time and effort needed to commit the crime.
 Deter – By utilizing the previous three techniques, the citizen may prevent a crime by deterring the crime from the property to an easier target elsewhere.

Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 938 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) The Five Principles of CPTED
5 1. Natural
Surveillance

5. Maintenance

COMMUNITY

2. Natural
Access Control

4. Activity
Support

3. Territorial
Reinforcement
It cannot be overemphasized that ALL of these principles applied equally will lend to the objectives of enhanced livability and greater natural safety of the community.

Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 939 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Natural Surveillance:
6 Natural Surveillance is the placement of physical features, activities and people in such a way as to maximize visibility of the community. “To see and be seen.” •Involves design and maintenance elements that ensure full opportunity for residents to engage in their normal behavior and activities to observe the space around them. •Creates an opportunity for the owner/management team to minimize the opportunity for concealment or secrecy by a person intending to commit a criminal act. • Increases visibility with landscaping in conjunction with proper lighting. •Increases the chance of apprehension; therefore, reducing an opportunity for the criminal element
• This is achieved by:
- appropriate and uniformed lighting
- low or see-through fencing / shrubs
- removal / redesign of areas that offer concealment
◦ blind corners
◦ shrubs / trees
◦ walls
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 940 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Examples of Natural Surveillance: “Eyes on Ground”
7 The criminal is hidden by tall foliage. Street view is obscured by tall foliage.

Clear line of sight from the porch and on to the street. Area is illuminated with proper heights and no obstructions.

Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 941 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Examples of Natural Surveillance: “Eyes on Ground”
8 Solid wall prevents visibility, but the see-through fence promotes Natural Surveillance.

Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 942 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Examples of Natural Surveillance: “Eyes on Ground”
eliminated. 9
Unable to see through the property: Blind spots behind the fence offering concealment to the criminal element.

Clear view through the property: Blind spots and concealment opportunities Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 943 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Examples of Natural Surveillance: “Eyes on Ground”
Overgrown vegetation prevents the ability to see in or out of the home and offers concealment for the criminal element.

Trimmed and maintained vegetation offers curb appeal, clears visibility, and rids concealment opportunities for the criminal element. 10 Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 944 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Natural Access Control
11 The Lofts
123
Unit numbers
clearly marked
Lit sign clearly
marks the
entrance
Security fencing, gates,
and landscaping
Natural Access Control is the physical guidance of people coming and going from a space by the placement of entrances, exits, fencing, landscaping, and lighting.
• Clearly define entrances and exits
- Minimize uncontrolled movement
- Well lit for greater natural surveillance
• Security fencing, gates, and hostile vegetation
- Decreases the criminal element’s accessibility
- Keeps people on the designated path
• Wayfinding throughout the community
- Community directory
- Marked community activity spaces, buildings, and units - Clearly identifiable walkways with direction
• Layers of security mechanisms
- Primary locks on doors / windows
- Secondary locks on door/window locks
- Security system
- Surveillance system
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 945 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Territorial Reinforcement
12 Owner/Management Teams are responsible for Private;
Semi-private; and, occasionally, Semi-public.

Territorial Reinforcement creates a clear delineation of space and separates your space from non-legitimate users
•Accomplished with landscaping, hardscaping, fencing, signs, flags, artwork, and seating
• Expresses pride and ownership of your space
Public is the open thoroughfare for all to travel
Semi-public is the public pedestrian space
Semi-private is the front yard, sidewalk, and driveway leading to your home Private is your porch/patio and home
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 946 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) 13 Seating shows personal
touch and ownership.

Flags show personal
touch and ownership.

Landscaping and fencing
define the transition
from public to private
areas.

Examples of Territorial Reinforcement
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 947 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) 14 Examples of Territorial Reinforcement Signage
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 948 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) 15 Parks and Playgrounds
Activity Support
Activity Support encourages activity in a location so that individuals become a part of thenatural surroundings, thus creating “natural surveillance.” •An active place that increases the use of the activity space, is enjoyed safely, and adds value to the space, while discouraging actions of non-legitimate users. • This is accomplished with active and passive efforts. - Passive – design elements that make area appealing and safe , such as parks, pools, playground, community rooms
- Active – scheduled events or steps taken to attract users to the area, such as picnics, community and sporting events, concerts, play groups
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 949 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Examples of Activity Support
16 This image depicts an area that was unutilized or under-utilized, but was repurposed into an active gathering place in the community, creating “Natural Surveillance.” Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 950 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Examples of Activity Support
17 This image depicts an area that was unutilized or under-utilized, but was repurposed into an active gathering place in the community, creating “Natural Surveillance.” Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 951 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Examples of Activity Support
18 The creation of community space provided an active gathering place in the community, creating “Natural Surveillance.” Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 952 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) 19 Maintenance
Routine and preventative maintenance helps ensure CPTED elements serve their intended purpose.
•Allows for the continued use of a space for its intended purpose. • Serves as an additional expression of territorial reinforcement. •Demonstratesthat someone cares and is watching over the property. - Neglected space often results in mistreatment by people - Willingness to call the police in the event of suspicious or criminal activity Examples of Maintenance
• Keep apartments to code standards
• Repair any damaged property
• Remove graffiti
• Replace / upgrade lighting
• Keep trash dumpster areas clean
• Maintain landscaping
• Remove abandoned / illegal vehicles
• Keep grounds free of trash, debris, and hazards
When done on a regular and consistent basis, maintenance can prevent ‘The Broken Window Theory’ or perceived lack of concern from becoming a reality in your community.

Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 953 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) 20 The Broken Windows Theory
The broken windows theory is a criminological theory that states that visible signs of crime, anti-social behavior, and civil disorder create an urban environment that encourages further crime and disorder, including serious crimes. The theory suggests that policing methods that target minor crimes, such as vandalism, loitering, public drinking, jaywalking and fare evasion, help to create an atmosphere of order and lawfulness.

The theory was introduced in a 1982 article by social scientists James Q. Wilson and George L. Kelling.

In short, when we see things broken or dilapidated, it is perceived that no one cares or is looking after it with any sense of ownership; thus, it is okay to further cause damage or violate the area/community without repercussions. This theory is also applied to people. When a person appears “broken” (e.g. an addict, prostitute, homeless, etc.) it is believed no one cares about them, so they, too, are violated without trouble or repercussion. The criminal’s thought is, “Who’s going to stop me or report it?” Crime is more likely to occur in communities with less care, less cleanliness, and less orderliness.

The theory states that maintaining and monitoring environments to prevent small crimes such as graffiti, trespassing, disorderly behavior, criminal damage, theft, and public drinking helps to create an atmosphere of order and lawfulness, thereby preventing more serious crimes from happening.

Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 954 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Examples of Maintenance
21 Set and maintain living standards for the community
BEFORE
AFTER
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 955 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Examples of Maintenance
22 Properly repair/replace damaged property
Damage this severe requires
replacement of the door, framing,
and locks.

Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 956 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Examples of Maintenance
23 Remove graffiti – Treat problem area(s) and surfaces with anti-graffiti paint orsupplies; it ultimately reduces future costs and labor.

Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 957 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Examples of Maintenance
24 Keep trash dumpster areas clean
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 958 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Examples of Maintenance
25 Following the 2’/6’ Rule, the shrubs are trimmed low, the tree canopies are high, and the properties are
clean throughout.

Maintain Landscaping
The above picture depicts overgrown shrubs, creating a visual barrier and hiding places for the criminal element.

Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 959 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Examples of Maintenance
26 Remove abandoned, unregistered, and/or illegal vehicles Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 960 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Examples of Maintenance
27 Enforce parking standards.

Confirm signage standards with the traffic
and/or police departments.

Consider a parking standard that vehicles
cannot be backed in, so all license plates
are visible.

Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 961 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) 28 CPTED Program Suggestions
BASIC
 Landscaping (2’/6’ Rule)

INTERMEDIATE
 Deadbolts with 1” inch throw
 3” strike plate screws
 Window and sliding door locks

ADVANCED
 Uniform lighting (table)
 Solid core doors
 180º eye viewer
 Legible apartment/building numbers
 Illuminated directory at entrance(s)
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 962 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) 29 Appendix 1:

Landscaping
Considerations when landscaping:
• What is the vegetation maturity and growth rate?
• How and what is its shape at full growth?
• Is it poisonous or dangerous to human or animal life? • Will it interfere with established or future lighting? • Will it interfere with lines of sight (natural surveillance)? • Is it friendly to activity space?
• What kind of maintenance will it require?
• Does it litter?
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 963 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Landscaping
30 Requirement for ALL levels is the 2ft/6ft Rule:
- Trim dense shrubs at 2ft or less. - Trim tree canopies at 6ft or higher.

Both reduce hiding places and increases lighting and overall visibility. 6 ft
2 ft
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 964 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Landscaping
Other recommendations:
31 Plant hostile vegetation under
and along walls and accessible
windows.

This deters access to
windows, trespassing, and
degradation of walls.

Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 965 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Landscaping
Other recommendations:
32 Avoid the use of rip-rap or river rocks; these become tools of opportunity.

Use small granite rocks in landscaping; it can be heard when walked on.

Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 966 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) 33 Table 1:

Suggested Vegetation
Recommended Plant Material:

The following lists are not meant to be all-inclusive, but to represent plants that require minimal maintenance to meet visual surveillance objectives.

SHRUBS
Ambrosia Deltoidea Ambrosia Dumosa White Bursage
Triangle leaf Bur-sage Artemisia Caucasica Silver Spreader Artemisia Schmidtiana Silver Mound Artiplex Semiba Obata Saltbush Dalea Greggii Indigo Bush
Dalea Oaxacana Eriogonum Umbellatum
Buckwheat Euphorbia Rigida Euphorbia
Gutierrezia Microcephala Juniper (except
Procumbens) Juniperus Chinensis var.

Krameria Parvifolia Snakeweed Krameria Parvifolia
Lantana Montevidensis Spreading Sunshine Maytenus Phyllanthoides Mangle Dulce
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 967 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Suggested Vegetation
34 BARRIER PLANTS (Hostile)
Acacia Constricta Acacia Greggii Agave
White Thorn Acacia Catclaw Acacia Pithecellobium
Atriplex Lentiformis Quailbush, Big Saltbush Bougainvillea Carissa Natal Plum Condalia Warnockii
Mexican Crucillo Ferocactus Barrel Cactus
Fouquieria Splendens Ocotillo Texas Ebony
Pyracantha Firethorn Rosa
Celtis Pallida Desert Hackberry Rose
Cercidium Floridum Blue Palo Verde Cercidium Microphyllum Foothill Palo Verde Chaenomeles Flowering Quince
Chamaerops Humilis Mediterranean Fan Palm Ilex
Holly Ilex Vomitoria Stoke’s Yaupon Holly
Lycium Species Wolfberry, Lycium Mayt enus Phyllanthoides Baja Dulce Opuntia Prickly Pear
Yucca Aloifolia Spanish Bayonet Yucca Baccata
Datil Yucca Zizyphus Obtusifolia Gray Thorn
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 968 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Suggested Vegetation
35 GROUND COVER PLANTS
Carpobrotus Edulis Malephora Crocea Santolina Virens
Ice Plant Myoporum Parvifolium Green Santolina
Clianthus Formosus Myoporum Verbena Bipinnatifida
Sturt’ s Desert Pea Oenothera Berlandieri Verbena
Convolvulus Mauritanicus Mexican Evening Prim rose Verbena Peruviana Ground Morning Glory Oenothera Stubbei Peruvian Verbena Gazania Spp. Saltillo Prim rose Verbena Rigida
Gazania Rosmarinus Officinallis Sandpaper Verbena
Lantana Montevidensis Prostrate Rosemary Verbena Tenera Trailing Lantana Santolina
Chamaecyparissus Moss Verbena
Lavender Cotton Wedelia Wedelia Trilobata

PERENNIAL WILFLOWERS
AllioniaIncarnata Dichelostiemma Pulchellum Evolvulus Arizonicus Trailing Windmills Bluedicks Arizona Blue Eyes
Bahia Absinthifolia Dyssodia Acerosa Ipomopsis Longiflora Bahia Dyssodia Pale Blue Trumpets
Baileye Multiradiata Dyssodia Pentachaeta Justicia Sonorae Desert Marigold Erigeron Divergens Sonoran Justicia
Casttilleja Chromosa Spreading Fleabane Linum Lewisii
Indian Paintbrush Blue Flax
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 969 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Suggested Vegetation

ANNUAL WILDFLOWERS
Abronia Villosa Ipomoea Leptotoma Monarda Austromontana Sand-Verbena Morning Glory Bee Balm
Camissonia Brevipes Kallstroemia Grandiflora Monoptilon Bellioides Yellow Cups Arizona Poppy Belly Flower
Catharanthus Roseus Lasthenia Chrysostoma Nama Demissum Madagascar Periwinkle Layia Platyglossa Purple Mat
Clarkia Amoena Tidy Tips Nam a Hispidum
Farewell-to-Spring Lesquerella Gordonii Nemphila Maculata Collinsia Heterophylla Yellow Blanket Five Spot
Chinese-houses Linaria Spp. Nemophila Menziesii
Coreopsis Bigelovii Toadflax Baby Blue Eyes
Desert Coreopsis Dimorphotheca Spp African Daisy
Eriophyllum Lanosum Lupinus Arizonicus Arizona Lupine
Lupinus Densiflorus Oenothera Deltoides Birdcage Evening Primrose Oenothera Primiveris Woolly Daisy Eriophyllum Wallacei
Lupine Lupinus Sparsiflorus Desert Lupine
Evening Prim rose Orthocarpus Purpurascens Owl’ s Clover Eschscholzia Calif Machaeranthera Canescens Pectis Papposa California Poppy (Aster Bigelovii) Big Aster Chinch Weed Eschscholzia Machaeranthera
Tanacetifolia Perityle Emoryi
Mexicana Painted Spurge Rock Daisy
Mexican Gold Poppy (Aster) Tahoka Daisy Matriciaria Grandiflora Euphorbia Heterphylla Pineapple Weed Cream Cups 36
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 970 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Suggested Vegetation
37 ANNUAL WILDFLOWERS (Continued)
Platystemon Californicus Gaillardia Pulchella Fire Wheel Blanket Fl Gilia Leptantha Mattiola Longibpetala cv.
‘Bicornis’ Evening Scented Stock
Mim ulus Begelovii Probosacidea Parviflora Devil’ s Claw Rafinesquia Neomexicana Showy Blue Gilia Gomphrene Globosa Globe Amaranth Helipterum Sp. Helipterum
Begelow’s Monkeyflower Mohavea Confertiflora Ghost Flower Desert-chicory Salvia Columbariae Chia
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 971 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Security Mechanisms
38 Intermediate level requirements:

Deadbolt locks on all exterior doors
Bolt must have a minimum 1” throw and strike plates installed with 3” screws into the framing.

Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 972 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Security Mechanisms
Intermediate requirements:

Secondary locks (thumb, pinned, rods, etc.) on all accessible windows and sliding doors Pins prevent the door or
window from opening.

Thumb locks reduce the opportunity of the door or
window opening; but if a hole is drilled into the track and the screw is twisted through, then it will prevent
the door or window from opening.
39 Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 973 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Security Mechanisms
Intermediate requirements:

Secondary locks (thumb, pinned, rods, etc.) on all accessible windows and sliding doors 40 Installing screws above the door’s pane
prevents lifting.

Installing a drop bar prevents the door from
sliding.

Placing a wooden or metal rod, that fits
“snugly,” prevents the door from sliding.

Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 974 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Security Mechanisms
41 Advanced requirements:

Solid core doors witha minimum thickness of1¾“
◦ Wood and metal are BEST
180 eye viewer
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 975 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Security Mechanisms
42 Replace the hinge screws
with the security screws.

Other recommendations:

Security hinges or replacement screws keep the door locked in place even if the hinge pins are removed.

Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 976 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Community Surveillance Cameras: Table 1
43 Community safety shouldn’t stop at your front door. Flock Safety helps HOAs, Neighborhood Associations, and law enforcement work together to capture the objective evidence needed to reduce crime rates, improve neighborhood security, and protect home values.

Thousands of HOAs already trust Flock Safety to automate their neighborhood watch. Flock Safety may help protect you from neighborhood crime with LPR (license plate recognition) cameras that see like a detective. Their devices capture objective evidence, like license plates and vehicle details, and most importantly with the ability to send real-time alerts to law enforcement computers mounted in police cars so they can take action, even while our citizen’s sleep.

When someone is driving a stolen or wanted vehicle into the community’s neighborhood, Flock Safety will alert the authorities? With Flock Safety, the community camera can automatically alert police when vehicles associated with crimes, sex offenders, and missing persons enter their neighborhood so that the police can proactively take the appropriate action to keep the community safe.

Neighbors is a neighborhood watch app that provides real-time, local crime and safety information.

Download the free Neighbors app on iOS or Android, join your neighborhood, and use the app to:
monitor neighborhood activity; share crime and safety-related videos, photos and text-based posts; and receive real-time safety alerts from your neighbors, local law enforcement and the Ring team. Download Neighbors from the App Store or Google Play Store today to join your digital neighborhood watch. For more information visit www.ring.com/neighbors.

With Ring Neighbors Portal App – citizens with Ring technology can take responsibility for the security of their neighborhood. Neighbors Portal Apps provide real-time crime and safety alerts from your neighbors and public safety agencies. With Neighbors Portal App, communities are able to know when and where things are happening in their area and share updates to keep your community informed.

Together with the community, police can co-produce prevention and intervention while leading to more effective and fair enforcement.

https://ring.com/neighbors https://www.flocksafety.com/product-overview/ Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 977 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges)

LIGHTING
44 Lighting is so much more than screwing in a light bulb! Lighting is used for the illumination of human activity and security. Lighting by itself does not prevent crime, but it does provide a sense of safety, the ability to SEE a potential threat, which provides the opportunity of choice. Proper lighting allows a person to clearly see and identify a person’s relevant descriptors, facial features, and various colorsof clothing or objects at 100 feet.

When applied within the CPTED principles, lighting is a great tool for owners, management teams, and residents to control and reduce FEAR, and the opportunity for criminal activity. Proper lighting, in conjunction with “natural surveillance,” is the best application.

Crimes against persons and property are self explanatory, but crimes against society (gambling, prostitution, and drug violations, etc.) represent society’s prohibition against engaging in certain types of activity; they are typically victimless crimes in which persons or property are not the object.

Statistics:
• Most U.S. crimes occur at night (6p-6a):
- Crimes against persons: 52%
- Property crimes: 40%
- Crimes against society: 55%
Purpose:
• Reduce:
- Crimes - Trespassers - Concealment - Lawsuits
• Increase:
- Security - Confidence - Territoriality - Use/Surveillance Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 978 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Lighting Comparisons
Light trespass(pollution)
45 Lighting “Language”:
• Foot-candle (FC) – a unit of illumination that is equivalent to the illumination of one candle at a distance of one foot
• Luminance – light reflected from a surface, otherwise known as brightness • Lumen – measure of the luminous flux emitted by one candle’s intensity (brightness) • Watt – a unit of power
• Uniform lighting – relative or equal luminance over an area • Adaptation – time for the human eye to adjust to lighting change • Light trespass (pollution) – unwanted light that crosses property lines Considerations when planning or retro-fitting lighting:

Lighting should:
• be energy efficient and illuminated during ALL hours of darkness; both are accomplished by using timers or dawn to dusk sensors.
• be vandal and tamper resistant.
• provide uniform and consistent levels of illumination that prevents pockets of shadows or glare where an adult-size person could gain concealment. • illuminate the following:
- Building and door numbers (visible from the street, numbers at least 6” in height) - Dark walls and corners
- All exterior doors
- Pathways
- Parking structures
- Specified and common areas
- Persons or objects at 100 feet
Be certain to replace damaged lighting; and when doing so, consider upgrading to LED and changing the fixtures. (See Tables 2-5)
Maintaining the same style of fixture throughout the community will show Territorial Reinforcement
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 979 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Lighting Comparisons
Light trespass(pollution)
46 The BEST is not always the BRIGHTEST
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 980 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Lighting Comparisons
Light trespass(pollution)
47 GOOD lighting is intentional and not random.

Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 981 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Lighting Comparisons
Examples of obstructed and unobstructed lighting
The light is obstructed by the tree illustrating
the importance of planning and maintaining
the landscaping and lighting.

Keep all lights free of any obstruction
for the best uniform lighting.
47 Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 982 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Lighting Comparisons
Examples of obstructed and unobstructed lighting
48 The light is obstructed by the tree,
casting a variety of shadows
Keep all lights free of any
obstruction for the best
uniform lighting.

Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 983 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Lighting Comparisons
49 Examples of overly bright and glare
Overly bright lights shock the
human eyes and cause a
temporary blindness.

Direct vs. Reflected Glare
Direct glare occurs when a
source of brightness is in the
line of vision.

Reflected glare occurs when
brightness from the source is
reflected on a shiny surface that
is in the line of vision
Glare makes it hard to see,
causing an unsafe situation
By simply blocking an overly
bright light, we allow you to see
beyond it, demonstrating the
importance of directed and
shielded lighting.

Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 984 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Lighting Comparisons
Examples of glare
HP sodium vapor or metal halide
lights without direction: Unable to
see subject directly under the light.

Directed LED lights provide uniform
lighting: Clearly able to see subject
and his surroundings.
50 Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 985 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Lighting Comparisons
HPS/Metal Halide vs LED
51 LED lighting:
- directed and reduces light trespass - reduces glare and offers true color rendition - reduces energy costs up to 70% - provides more uniform lighting and reduces shadows Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 986 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Lighting Comparisons
HPS/Metal Halide vs LED
52 LED lighting:
- reduces energy costs up to 70% - provides uniform lighting - reduces shadows - reduces glare
- offerstrue color rendition
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 987 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Lighting Comparisons
Range of uniformity and overlap
53 Pedestrian area, parking area, and roadway are clearly illuminated.

Pedestrian area is not illuminated.

Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 988 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Lighting Comparisons
Range of uniformity and overlap
Although the lighting is directional, the failure to overlap allowed shadows and void areas that provides an adult-size person with concealment.

The additional posts provide overlapped and uniform light, effectively eliminating the vulnerable areas.

Lighting designed to provide safe levels of visibility for all users The pedestrian is not illuminated, and several surrounding areas offer great concealment for the criminal element.

Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 989 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Lighting Comparisons
HPS/Metal Halide vs LED
55 It is apparent the LED
lighting provides a more
uniform, brighter, and pure
illumination of the space.

It createsa safer
environment.

It enables a person to
clearly see a person, object,
and true colors (color
rendition) at 100 feet or
better.

Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 990 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Lighting Comparisons
HPS/Metal Halide vs LED
56 Which
street
would
you
rather
walk
along?
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 991 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) 57 Situational Crime Prevention
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 992 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Table 1:

Lighting Type and Cost Analysis
58 Type Initial
Costs
Energy
Costs
Life
Hours Pros Cons
Light Emitting
Diodes (LED) $25.99 $82.17 60,000
Longest life
Highly rugged
Instant light
Silent operation
Low energy costs
Best color rendition
Continuous development
High initial cost
High Pressure
Sodium $19.99 $92.50 24,000
Low energy costs
Good life
Good optical control
Moderate initial cost
Fair color rendition
Contains mercury
Restart time
Cycle at end of life
Low Pressure
Sodium $29.99 $19.54 14,000 Low energy costsHigh efficiency High initial cost
Worst color rendition
Safety concerns
Metal Halide $18.19 $38.20 12,000
Low energy costs
High efficiency
Good optical control
Great color rendition
Moderate initial cost
Restart time
Short life
Contains mercury
Compact
Fluorescent (CFL) $4.98 $191.73 10,000
Minimal initial cost
Good efficiency
Moderate life
90% less heat
Good color rendition
Instant ON response
Full intensity atstart-up
Contains mercury
Fluorescent $15.99 $92.80 6,000
Moderate initial cost
Good efficiency
Good color rendition
Instant ON response
Moderate energy costs
Moderate life
Contains mercury
Quartz/Quartz
Halogen $9.98 $789.60 2,000 Good color rendition
High heat
Short Life
Low efficiency
Fragile
Incandescent $1.38 $821.72 750 -2000 Minimal initial cost High energy costs
Short life
High heat
Low efficiency
Fair color rendition
Fragile
Assessment is based on 60,000 hours of operation of 800 lumens.

Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 993 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Table 2:

Lighting Fixtures
Fixture Definition Benefits Limitations
BEST - Commonly used for wide
coverage in large spaces (parking
lots, streets, playing fields, etc.)
Zero intensity at or above
horizontal .
- Limits spill light onto adjacent
property.
- Reduces glare.
- No light is emitted directly from
the luminaire into the sky.

May reduce pole spacing to
maintain uniformity; increasing
pole and luminaire quantities for
proper lighting.

BETTER - Commonly used for wide
coverage in large spaces (parking
lots, streets, playing fields, etc.)
Intensity at or above 90°
horizontal no more
than 2.5%.

Small increase in high-angle light
allowsincreased pole spacing.
- May allow some up-light from
fixture causing trespass.
- Typically a small overall impact
on sky glow.

GOOD - Commonly used for wide
coverage in large spaces (parking
lots, streets, playing fields, etc.)
Intensity at or above 90°
horizontal, no more
than 5%.

High-angle light accents taller
vertical surfacessuch as buildings.

Most light is still directed
downward.
- Little control of light at
property line.
- Potential for
increased glare when using high
wattage luminaires.
- Typically directs more light
into the sky than cutoff.

No limitations on light distribution
at any angle.

Uniform luminous surfaces such
as internally illuminated signs or
globes. Wattage should be
limited. Suitable for sports
lighting, facade, landscape, or
other applications where
luminaires are tilted due
to limitations in pole or fixture
locations.
- Location and aiming are critical.
- Most likely of all
categories to produce offensive
brightness and
sky glow.
- Easily shaken and broken
Vandal Resistant
Lighting fixtures designed for use
in abusive environments; most
common forms of abuse are
impact and prying.
- Increased safety
- Durable
- Reduced maintenance
- Reduced costs
- Aesthetically pleasing
- Initial cost
- Application options regarding
lamp posts
Bollard
Provides elements of safety for
larger outdoor spaces.
- Defines space and boundaries
- Physical barrier
- Illuminate pedestrian areas
- Greater light than standard
decorative lighting for
pedestrians
- Initial costs
- Reduced amount of
Illumination
59 Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 994 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) 60 Lighting Fixtures
Fixture Definition Benefits Limitations
Up-lighting
Known as spotlights, flood
lights, and well lights. Often
used to illuminate building
numbers, flags, landscaping
- Illuminates building numbers
- Aesthetically pleasing with a
dramatic effect
- Greater opportunity of light
trespass
Decorative
Small, limited illuminating
lighting fixtures to add
ambient lighting to a space
- Defines space and boundaries
- Aesthetically pleasing
- Initial costs
- Reduced amount of Illumination
- Not likely to be vandal resistant
Vandal / Tamperresistant fixtures
Install lighting fixtures with tamper resistant screws.

Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 995 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) 61 Table 3:

Directional Lighting Fixtures
Directionalstyle lighting
Most of the lighting on the LEFT does NOT provide direction and permits lighting trespass and lighting pollution.

Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 996 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) Works Cited:

City of Chandler. City of Chandler. CPTED Handbook. Replicated. Chandler: City of Chandler https://www.chandlerpd.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/CPTED-Handbook-v4-20170627.pdf City of Portland. City of Portland CPTED Definition and Policy Strategies. Portland: City of Portland, n.d. Web. 9 Oct. 2015.

City of Portland. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. Portland: City of Portland, n.d.

Web. 9 Oct. 2015.

City of Tempe. City of Tempe - CPTED Guidelines. Tempe: City of Tempe, 1997.

Florida Design Out Crime Association (FLDOCA). City of Tempe. Web. 9 Oct. 2015.

Hushen, Art. "Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design." Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design - Basic. Paradise Valley Police Department, Paradise Valley. Jan. 2015.

Lecture.

Mesa Police Department. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. Mesa: Mesa Police Department, n.d. Web. 9 Oct. 2015.

Mesa Police Department. Tri Star Mgr Handbook. Mesa: Mesa Police Department, n.d. Tri Star Mgr Handbook. Web. 9 Oct. 2015.

Oakland Police Department. CPTED Security Handbook. Oakland: Oakland Police Department, n.d. Greater Rockridge Neighborhood Crime Prevention Council. Web. 9 Oct. 2015. "Why Does Outdoor Lighting Matter?" Illinois Coalition for Responsible Outdoor Lighting. N.p., n.d. Web. 30 Nov. 2015.
62 Item 5-P
August 27, 2024
Item 5-P
August 27, 2024

5.P.d
Packet Pg. 997 Attachment: Written Comments (6561 : Resolution of Intention to Initiate Amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance for Fences, Walls and Hedges) City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: August 27, 2024
Agenda Item: 5.Q
1 of 3
To: Mayor and City Council
From: David Martin, Director, Administration
Subject: Approval of First Modification to License Agreement with Cirque du Soleil Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt a finding of no possibility of significant effect pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines; and

2. Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a first modification to the License Agreement No.11517 between the City and Cirque du Soleil to provide a rent credit and extend hours of amplified sound for the evening of October 24, 2024.

Summary
On December 12, 2023, Council authorized the City Manager to negotiate and execute a license agreement with Cirque du Soleil to welcome back their iconic big top tent on a portion of Beach Lot 1N, the parking lot north of the Pier, from October 1, 2024 to January 24, 2025. The last time Cirque du Soleil brought its traveling circus to Santa Monica was 10 years prior. The City is excited to host the return of Cirque du Soleil as part of the City’s post-pandemic economic recovery and expansion of community cultural offerings that will benefit the economic wellbeing of the community. To help support their opening success, Cirque needs to make some additional improvements to Lot 1N to accommodate their electrical needs, and has requested that the City allow them to host a premiere event on the site on October 24, 2024, which would necessitate a modification to the license agreement.

5.Q
Packet Pg. 998
2 of 3
Discussion
As part of the site preparation for the show it was determined the electrical equipment which powers the event site and parking lot lights requires replacement prior to the event’s occupancy. The cost for repairs is estimated to be $168,000 including building permits and fees, engineering drawings and project management. This repair will be funded by Cirque du Soleil. Staff seeks authorization to modify the License to provide a $50,000 rent credit to partially offset Cirque’s costs against the site rental fee of $1,544,309. The investment in Lot 1N to improve the electrical equipment will benefit the City and Beach Lot visitor experience and help support future event activations on this site.

Also, the License Agreement between the parties limits the use of amplified sound to 10PM. Cirque du Soleil requests permission to allow amplified sound inside their tent on the night of Thursday, October 24, 2024 until 1:30 AM to coincide with their official premiere show and after-party. Other than this one evening, use of amplification will continue to be limited to 10PM. A neighborhood notice will be sent to residences within a 500 foot radius of the event in advance and will include contact information should there be any concerns. All speakers will be directed away from residences and it is not anticipated that the amplified sound will be audible outside the tent.

Environmental Review
The License Agreement is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines. Section 15301 exempts Class 1 (Existing Facilities) projects from CEQA, which include the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. The agreement involves the licensing of the existing property located at 1550 Pacific Coast Highway, and would not result in the expansion of this site. Therefore, the agreement is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15301.

Additionally, the agreement is exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines which states that CEQA does not apply “where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on

5.Q
Packet Pg. 999
3 of 3
the environment.” The proposed modifications of the agreement would not result in a physical environmental effect on the environment, and as such is exempt from CEQA.

Past Council Actions
Meeting Date Description
12/12/2023
(Attachment A)
Approval to Enter into a License Agreement with Cirque du Soleil
Financial Impacts and Budget Actions
The recommended action is estimated to result in a reduction in the amount of $50,000 in the site rental fee to the Beach Fund for FY 2024-25. If approved, the revenue adjustments will be included in the FY 2024-25 midyear budget process.

Prepared By: Elana Buegoff, Pier Administrator
Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:

A. 12.12.2023 Staff Report (Web Link)
B. OaksInitiativeNotice
C. Levine Act Disclosure Form

5.Q
Packet Pg. 1000
Oaks Initiative Notice

CITY OF SANTA MONICA

NOTICE TO APPLICANTS, BIDDERS, PROPOSERS

AND OTHERS SEEKING DISCRETIONARY PERMITS, CONTRACTS, OR OTHER

BENEFITS FROM THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA
Santa Monica’s voters adopted a City Charter amendment commonly known as the Oaks Initiative. It prohibits a public official from receiving specified personal benefits from a person or entity after the official votes, or otherwise takes official action, to award a “public benefit” to that person or entity. Examples of a “public benefit” include public contracts to provide goods or services worth more than $25,000 or a land use approval worth more than $25,000.

The Oaks Initiative requires the City to provide this note and information about the Initiative’s requirements. An information sheet on the Oaks Initiative is attached.

You may obtain a full copy of the Initiative’s text from the City Clerk.

Therefore, if you are seeking a “public benefit” covered by the Oaks Initiative, you must supply that information on the attached form (Attachment A).

5.Q.b
Packet Pg. 1001 Attachment: OaksInitiativeNotice [Revision 1] (6562 : First Modification to License Agreement with Cirque du Soleil) (Attachment A)
City of Santa Monica
Oaks Initiative Disclosure Form
All persons or entities receiving public benefits defined below from the City of Santa Monica shall provide the names of trustees, directors, partners and officers and names of those with more than a 10% equity, participation or revenue interest. This information is required by City Charter Article XXII—Taxpayer Protection.

Name of Entity: ____________________________________________ NAME(S) OF PERSONS OR ENTITIES RECEIVING PUBLIC BENEFIT:

Cirque du Soleil America Newco Inc.

NAME(S) OF TRUSTEES, DIRECTORS, PARTNERS, AND OFFICERS: Stephane Lefebvre, Mike Newquist, Duncan J. Fisher, Jocelyn Cote, Emmanuelle Leclerc-Granger NAME(S) OF THOSE WITH MORE THAN A 10% EQUITY, PARTICIPATION OR REVENUE INTEREST: Cirque du Soleil USA Newco Inc.

Public benefits include:

1. Personal services contracts in excess of $25,000 over any 12-month period;

2. Sale of material, equipment or supplies to the City in excess of $25,000 over a 12-month period;

3. Purchase, sale or lease of real property to or from the City in excess of $25,000 over a 12-month period;

4. Non-competitive franchise awards with gross revenue of $50,000 or more in any 12-month period;

5. Land use variance, special use permit, or other exception to an established land use plan, where the decision has a value in excess of $25,000;

6. Tax “abatement, exception, or benefit” of a value in excess of $5,000 in any 12-month period; or

7. Payment of “cash or specie” of a net value to the recipient of $10,000 in any 12-month period.

Prepared by: _Jorg Schlegel___________ Signature:

Date: ___8/19/2024________ Title: Director Site Selection FOR CITY USE ONLY:

Bid/PO/Contract # ___________________________ Permit # _____________________________________ (1/06)

5.Q.b
Packet Pg. 1002 Attachment: OaksInitiativeNotice [Revision 1] (6562 : First Modification to License Agreement with Cirque du Soleil) City of Santa Monica Levine Act Disclosure Form

CITY OF SANTA MONICA

Have you, your company, or any agent on behalf of you or your company, made any political contributions of more than $250 to any City Officer in the twelve months preceding the date of the submission of your application or proposal? ____YES ____ NO
Name of Councilmember or City Officer: _________________________________ Docusign Envelope ID: 44E63E48-3852-484E-8E1D-6C3BC4870307

5.Q.c
Packet Pg. 1003 Attachment: Levine Act Disclosure Form [Revision 1] (6562 : First Modification to License Agreement with Cirque du Soleil) City of Santa Monica Levine Act Disclosure Form
Name of Contributor: _________________________________________________ Date(s) of Contribution(s): ____________________________________________ Amount(s) ________________________________________________________ Please specify below and/or add additional sheet(s) to identify additional Councilmembers or City Officers to whom you and/or your agents made campaign contributions.

I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.

Signed: ____________________________ Date: ____________________ Print Name: _________________________ Title: _____________________ Company: __________________________
Additional Disclosures:

Please note this form is a public record and subject to a California Public Records Act request.
8/19/2024 Duncan J. Fisher President, Touring Show Division Gaia / Cirque du Soleil Docusign Envelope ID: 44E63E48-3852-484E-8E1D-6C3BC4870307

5.Q.c
Packet Pg. 1004 Attachment: Levine Act Disclosure Form [Revision 1] (6562 : First Modification to License Agreement with Cirque du Soleil) 1 June 11, 2024
(NOT APPROVED)

CITY OF SANTA MONICA

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 11, 2024
A regular meeting of the Santa Monica City Council was called to order by Mayor Brock at 5:34 p.m., on Tuesday, June 11, 2024, at City Council Chambers, 1685 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA and 29 Powder Ridge Rd, Crested Butte, CO 81224.

Roll Call: Present: Mayor Phil Brock (arrived at 6:37 p.m.) Mayor Pro Tem Lana Negrete
Councilmember Gleam Davis
Councilmember Oscar de la Torre (absent)
Councilmember Christine Parra
Councilmember Caroline Torosis
Councilmember Jesse Zwick (via teleconference)
Also Present: City Manager David White
City Attorney Douglas Sloan
Interim City Clerk Nikima S. Newsome
CONVENE/PLEDGE On order of the Mayor, the City Council convened at 5:34 p.m., with all members present except Councilmember de la Torre and Mayor Brock. Councilmember Parra led the assemblage in the Pledge of Allegiance.

LEVINE ACT

DISCLOSURE
Pursuant to the Levine Act (Govt Code Section 84308), any party to a permit, license, contract, or other entitlement before the Council is required to disclose on the record any contribution, including aggregated contributions, of more than $250 made by the party or the party's agents within the preceding 12 months to any City official.

Participants and agents are requested to make this disclosure as well.

The disclosure must include the name of the party, participant, or agent, and any other person making the contribution; the name of the recipient, the amount of the contribution, and the date the contribution was made.

No recusals were made pursuant to the Levine Act.

AGENDA

MANGEMENT
Mayor Pro Tem Negete announced that Item 3.D. would be heard after Closed Session.

5.R
Packet Pg. 1005 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jun 11, 2024 5:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) 2 June 11, 2024
Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Negrete, seconded by Councilmember Davis to hear public input on the continued items since public input was not heard on these items at the previous meeting.

The motion was approved by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers Zwick, Parra, Davis, Torosis,
Mayor Pro Tem Negrete
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember de la Torre,
Mayor Brock

GENERAL PUBLIC
INPUT:

Members of the public Anya Baroff, Jerry Rubin, Linda Clark, Jeremy Middlesworth, John Berry, Rachel Lee Millena, Denise Barton, Johnathan Foster, Lava Sunder, Stuart Selonick, People of California, John Macalaster, Aubrey West, Dhun May, and Harvey Eder commented on various local issues.

PUBLIC INPUT FOR

CLOSED SESSION,

SPECIAL AGENDA

ITEMS AND CONSENT
CALENDAR ONLY:

No members of the public commented on closed session items.

No members of the public commented on special agenda items.

Members of the public Denise Barton commented on consent calendar items.

PROCLAMATIONS/

COMMENDATIONS/

SPECIAL AGENDA
ITEMS

3.A. Proclamation: Men's Health Month, was presented.

3.B. Proclamation: Juneteenth, was presented.

3.C. Commendation: Visionary Leaders in Action Coalition, was presented.

3.D. Commendation: Rip City Skates, was presented.

3.E. City Manager Report, was presented.

CLOSED SESSIONS On order of the Mayor, the City Council recessed at 6:41 p.m., to consider closed sessions and returned at 7:15 p.m., with all members present, to report the following:

4.A. Conference with legal counsel - existing litigation - Gov. Code §54956.9(d)(1): Santos Dolores Amaya De Vides v. Santa Monica; LASC Case No. 23STCV09774
The City Attorney advised this matter was heard with no reportable action taken.

5.R
Packet Pg. 1006 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jun 11, 2024 5:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) 3 June 11, 2024

4.B. Conference with legal counsel - existing litigation - Gov. Code §54956.9(d)(1): Scott Harber v. Santa Monica; LASC Case No. 22STCV02016
The City Attorney advised this matter was heard with no reportable action taken.

4.C. Conference with legal counsel - existing litigation - Gov. Code § 54956.9(d)(1): Christina Choi, et al. v. Santa Monica, et al.; LASC Case No. 22STCV21608 [report out only]
The City Attorney advised this matter was heard with no reportable action taken.

4.D. Conference with legal counsel - existing litigation - Gov. Code § 54956.9(d)(1): Robinson, Cheyenne, et al. v. Santa Monica, et al., LASC Case No. 21STCV2239 [report out only]
Choi v. City; personal injury case settled for $2.95 million; Council approved the settlement authority at the January 23, 2024, meeting with a vote of 7-0.

Robinson v. City; personal injury case settled for $3 million total, with $2.75 million to Robinson and $250,000 to Eny-Edy; Council approved settlement authority at the May 14, 2024, meeting with a vote of 6-0, with Councilmember de la Torre absent.

REPORT ON COUNCIL
TRAVEL
There was nothing to report on Council travel.

CONSENT CALENDAR: All items were considered and approved in one motion unless removed by a Councilmember for discussion.

Motion by Councilmember Torosis, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Negrete, to approve the Consent Calendar, reading resolutions by title only and waiving further reading thereof. The motion was approved by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers Torosis, Davis, Parra, Zwick,
Mayor Pro Tem Negrete, Mayor Brock
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember de la Torre

LIGHTING AND

ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES

5.A. Authorization of Purchase Orders with One Source
Distributors and Turtle ALA, LLC for General Lighting and Electrical Supplies, was approved.

5.R
Packet Pg. 1007 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jun 11, 2024 5:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) 4 June 11, 2024
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt a finding of Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15301 (Existing Facilities), of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines;

2. Award Bid SP2711 to One Source Distributors, as the primary vendor, and Turtle ALA, LLC., as the secondary vendor for the purchase and delivery of general lighting and electrical supplies for the Public Works Department;

3. Authorize the Procurement Manager to issue a Purchase Order with One Source Distributors for General Lighting & Electrical Supplies in the amount not to exceed $1,080,000 (for one year, with four additional one-year renewal options to extend at increases between 12% to 15%) for a total amount not to exceed $5,400,000, with future year funding contingent on Council budget approval; and

4. Authorize the Procurement Manager to issue a Purchase Order with Turtle ALA, LLC. for General Lighting & Electrical Supplies in the amount not to exceed $545,000 (for one year, with four additional one-year renewal options to extend at increases of 5%) for a total amount not to exceed $2,725,000, with future year funding contingent on Council budget approval.

POOR REPAIR AND

MAINTENANCE

5.B. Award Bid with Commercial Aquatic Services for Pool Repair and Maintenance, wad approved.

Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt a finding of Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines;

2. Award Bid #4482 to Commercial Aquatic Services, Inc for the repair and maintenance of City pools and treated splash pads for the Public Works Department; and

3. Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute an agreement with Commercial Aquatic Services in an amount not to exceed $649,400, plus a contingency of $157,116, for a two-year term, with three one-year renewal options, on the same terms and conditions for a total amount not to exceed $806,516 over a five-year period, with future year funding contingent on Council budget approval.

FEMA HAZARD

MITIGATION GRANT

5.C. Approval to Accept FEMA Hazard Mitigation Grant Funds for Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, was approved.

Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

5.R
Packet Pg. 1008 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jun 11, 2024 5:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) 5 June 11, 2024

1. Adopt a finding of no possibility of significant effect pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.

2. Authorize the City Manager to accept a grant awarded in an amount of $135,000 from the Department of Homeland Security for the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program in the City Manager’s Office, and to accept all grant renewals.

3. Authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents to accept the grant and all grant renewals.

4. Adopt the attached resolution with the State of California, Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (CalOES) Program.

5. Authorize budget changes as outlined in the Financial Impacts & Budget Action section of this report (requires 5 votes).

BRAKE PARTS 5.D. Award Purchase Order with American Moving Parts, LLC for Transit Bus and Fire Department Brake Parts, was approved.

Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt a finding of Categorical Exemption (Class 1 Existing Facilities) pursuant to Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines;

2. Award Bid #4488 to American Moving Parts LLC for the purchase of brake components for transit buses and heavy-duty fire apparatus for the Transportation and Fire Departments;

3. Authorize the Procurement Manager to issue a purchase order with American Moving Parts, LLC for the purchase of transit bus and heavy-duty fire apparatus brake parts in the amount not to exceed $169,096 for one year, with five additional one-year renewal options to extend on the same terms and conditions for a total amount not to exceed $1,177,097, which includes a 10% contingency, with future year funding contingent on Council budget approval.

ELECTRIC VEHICLE

CHARGERS

5.E. Approve Modification to Award with GreenWealth Energy Solutions for Electric Vehicle Charging Services, was approved.

Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt a finding of Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15301 (Existing Facilities), Section 15302 (Replacement/Reconstruction), and Section 15303 (New Construction of Small Structures) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines; and

2. Approve a modification to contract award #372 to increase the number of electric vehicle chargers and locations with GreenWealth Energy Solutions, Inc., with no change in contract authority or term.

5.R
Packet Pg. 1009 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jun 11, 2024 5:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) 6 June 11, 2024

BUS STOP AND

SHELTER CELLULAR

SERVICES

5.F. Approval of Second Contract Modification with WaySine, LLC for Real-Time Arrival Sign Cellular Service, was approved.

Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council

1. Adopt a finding of Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15302(Replacement and Reconstruction) and Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.

2. Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a second modification to agreement #10757 (CCS) in an amount not to exceed $165,600 with WaySine, L.L.C., for parts and continued cellular service for existing real-time signs at Big Blue Bus stops and shelters for the Department of Transportation. This will result in a 7-year amended agreement with a new total amount not to exceed $977,725 with future year funding contingent on Council budget approval.

UASI 2023 GRANT 5.G. Accept UASI 2023 Grant and Approve 3rd Modification with Advanced Problem Solving, LLC, was approved.

Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Authorize the City Manager to accept a grant award in the amount of $250,000 from the 2022 Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) for homeland security projects in the Fire Department;

2. Authorize the City Manager to accept a grant award in the amount of $1,433,607 from the 2023 Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) for homeland security projects in the Fire and Police Departments;

3. Authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents to accept the grants and any subsequent grant modifications;

4. Adopt a finding of no possibility of significant effect pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines;

5. Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a third modification to agreement no. 10967 in the amount of $850,000 with Advanced Problem Solving, LLC (APS), a California-based company, to coordinate and host the grant-funded Regional Training Delivery Model for the Fire Department. This will result in a fiveyear amended agreement with a new total amount not to exceed $5,782,000, with future year funding contingent on Council budget approval; and

6. Authorize a budget amendment as outlined in the Financial Impacts & Budget Actions section of this report (requires 5 votes).

DATA PROTECTION

SERVICES

5.H. Approval of Agreement with Nth Generation Computing, Inc. for Cohesity Data Protection, was approved.

5.R
Packet Pg. 1010 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jun 11, 2024 5:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) 7 June 11, 2024
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute an agreement with Nth Generation Computing, Inc. for data protection hardware, software, and services for the Information Services Department. This recommended award is made as an exception to the competitive bidding process pursuant to Section 2.24.250 (c) and is for a total amount not to exceed $1,140,041.00, with future year funding contingent on Council budget approval.

2. Adopt a finding of no possibility of significant effect pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.

COUNCIL MEETING 5.I. Approval of Cancellation of Regular City Council Meeting for August 13, 2024, was approved.

Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council vote to cancel the regular meeting scheduled for August 13, 2024, due to a lack of a quorum.

MINUTES 5.J. Minutes of the City Council - Special Meeting - Jun 1, 2024 9:00 AM, were approved.

MINUTES 5.K. Minutes of the City Council - Special Meeting - May 14, 2024 4:30 PM, were approved.

PUBLIC INPUT ON

REMAINING AGENDA
ITEMS:

Member of the public Jerry Rubin commented on continued item 8.D.

Member of the public Denise Barton commented on item 7.A.

Member of the public Martin Ronzio Garcia commented on item 8.E.

Member of the public Laurie Delgado commented on item 10.A.

STUDY SESSION:

HOUSING ELEMENT
PHASE 2

7.A. Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation Study Session, was presented.

Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Receive the presentation on, discuss, and provide direction regarding proposed concepts for 6th Cycle Housing Element Phase 2 Implementation Programs.

Questions asked and answered of staff included: will deed-restricted

5.R
Packet Pg. 1011 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jun 11, 2024 5:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) 8 June 11, 2024
affordable housing units be potentially eliminated; would any state law changes be taken into consideration; what constitutes deed-restricted affordable housing; would rent-controlled units converted to deed-restricted affordable housing units retain the same rental rates; has the Rent Control Board been involved; what are the open space standards; were any architects consulted; were there studies tied to adaptive reuse; which building types are ideal for adaptive reuse purposes; has the Fire Department been consulted with; will towers be allowed throughout the Bergamot plan and are they applicable to housing or commercial properties; how will potential increased traffic be addressed; regarding replacement units under SB30, will lowincome households be required to be deed restricted units, do any state or local protections exist for the moderate income renter to have right of first refusal; what is the goal of the proposed in-leu fee study; why would adaptive reuse projects include additional construction; of all proposed choices, which would be the most conservative; are there incentives tied to creating ground floor green space; would reduced podium footprints promote open space; will parking be strictly onsite; how will the increased demand for parking be mitigated; can parking permits be denied for residential areas for major streets; and what is the percentage of office vacancies in Santa Monica.

Considerable discussion ensued on topics including, but not limited to, codifying a preference for replacement units to be deed restricted for lowincome households or rent controlled; prohibiting projects that results in a net reduction in housing units; using parcel size to determine open space; gradation-based solution complicating requirements; requiring open space on the ground floor; building heights; restricting the conversion of hotels/motels to multiple unit dwelling use in the ARO, particularly in the Coastal Zone; feasibility of adaptive reuse projects; and additional floor of open space being permitted for adaptive reuse projects.

CONTINUED ITEMS:

TRANSIENT

OCCUPANCY TAX

ADVISORY COMMITTEE

8.A. Appointment to an unscheduled vacancy on the Transient Occupancy Tax Advisory Committee for a term ending on June 30, 2025. (Continued from 5/14/2024), was heard.

On order of the Mayor, the floor was opened for nominations.

Councilmember Davis nominated Jacob M. Dlouhy.

Councilmember Torosis nominated Kevin Anawati.

Jacob M. Dlouhy was appointed by the following vote:

Dlouhy: Councilmembers Zwick, Parra, Davis, Mayor Pro Tem Negrete,

5.R
Packet Pg. 1012 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jun 11, 2024 5:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) 9 June 11, 2024
Mayor Brock
Anawati: Councilmember Torosis

HUMAN SERVICES

COMMISSION

8.B. Appointment to one unscheduled vacancy on the Human Services Commission for a term ending on June 30, 2026, was continued to the June 25
th meeting.

COMMISSION OF

SUSTAINABILITY,

ENVIRONMENTAL

JUSTICE AND THE

ENVIRONMENT

8.C. Recommendation to rescind the appointment of Jeff Bush to the Commission of Sustainability, Environmental Justice and the Environment; and, appoint to that unscheduled vacancy for a term ending on June 30, 2024, was continued to be held in conjunction with the annual appointments at the next meeting with a full Council.

TREE REMOVAL AND
CANOPY

8.D. Request of Mayor Brock that the City Manager and City Attorney develop policies that regulate tree removal as a result of new development including exploring replacement requirements as part of the development or on public property to protect and preserve the City’s tree canopy. In developing this policy, the City Manager is being asked to consider requiring three replacement trees for every tree removed. (Continued from 5/28/2024), was presented.

Considerable discussion ensued on topics including, but not limited to, feasibility of moving a tree instead of planting three additional trees; impact of narrowness of sidewalks on planting trees and potential methods to widen sidewalks.

Direction given to staff to consider the replacement of trees that are lost on private property.

Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Negrete, seconded by Councilmember Parra, to approve the recommended action. The motion was approved by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers Torosis, Davis, Parra, Zwick,
Mayor Pro Tem Negrete, Mayor Brock
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember de la Torre

SIDEWALK OUTDOOR

DINING FEES

8.E. Request of Mayor Brock, Vice Mayor Negrete, and
Councilmember de la Torre that the City Manager and City Attorney evaluate the attached request from Downtown Santa Monica, Inc. and return to City Council with recommendations to reduce the per square foot monthly fees associated with the use of sidewalks for outdoor dining on the Third Street Promenade to support the City’s economic recovery. In addition, the City Manager and City Attorney are also

5.R
Packet Pg. 1013 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jun 11, 2024 5:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) 10 June 11, 2024
being asked to evaluate and return to City Council with recommendations for incentives such as waiving fees for a period of time to spur outdoor dining on sidewalks on the Third Street Promenade, was presented.

Considerable discussion ensued on topics including, but not limited to, why is this limited to just Third Street and will there be an appreciable financial impact.

Motion by Councilmember Parra, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Negrete, to approve the recommended action. The motion was approved by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers Zwick, Parra, Davis, Torosis,
Mayor Pro Tem Negrete, Mayor Brock
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember de la Torre
ORDINANCES:

MASSAGE

ESTABLISHEMENTS

10.A. Introduction and Adoption of Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance No. 2781 (CCS) to Remove the Minor Use Permit, Location, and Facility Requirements for Massage Establishments from the City’s Personal Service Use Standards for Specific Uses and Activities, was introduced and adopted.

Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt a finding of Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.

2. Introduce and adopt an Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance amending the text of the Zoning Ordinance to remove the Minor Use Permit, location, and facility requirements for massage establishments from the Personal Service use standards for specific uses and activities contained in Santa Monica Municipal Code Section 9.31.230.

Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Negrete, seconded by Councilmember Parra, to adopt the ordinance, reading by title only and waiving further reading thereof. The motion was approved by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers Torosis, Davis, Parra, Zwick,
Mayor Pro Tem Negrete, Mayor Brock
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember de la Torre

10.B. Introduce for First Reading an Ordinance Amending Santa

5.R
Packet Pg. 1014 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jun 11, 2024 5:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) 11 June 11, 2024
Monica Municipal Code Chapter 9.53 to Align the City’s
Transportation Demand Management Ordinance with South Coast Air Quality Management District’s (AQMD) Rule 2202 and Adopt a Resolution Approving Amendments to the Related Memorandum of Understanding with AQMD, was introduced.

Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt a finding of no possibility of significant effect pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) and a finding of Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines;

2. Introduce for first reading an ordinance amending Santa Monica Municipal Code Chapter 9.53 (Transportation Demand
Management) to align with the South Coast Air Quality Management District’s Rule 2202 regulations; and

3. Adopt Resolution No. 11589 (CCS) approving amendments to the related Memorandum of Understanding with the South Coast Air Quality Management District.

Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Negrete, seconded by Councilmember Davis, to introduce and hold first reading of the ordinance reading by title only and waiving further reading thereof. The motion was approved by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers Torosis, Davis, Parra, Zwick,
Mayor Pro Tem Negrete, Mayor Brock
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember de la Torre

ELECTRIC VEHICLE

CHARGING ACCESS

10.C. Introduce for First Reading an Ordinance that Supports Electric Vehicle Charging Access by Adopting Local Amendments to the 2022 California Green Building Standards Code, was introduced.

Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt a finding of Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15308 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines;

2. Introduce for first reading the attached Ordinance that adopts local amendments under SMMC Chapter 8.102 to the 2022 California Green Buildings Standards Code to support increased access to electric vehicle charging;

3. Adopt attached Resolution No. 11590 (CCS) that provides findings of local climatic, geological, topographical, and environmental conditions as required to adopt Santa Monica local amendments to the 2022 California Green Building Standards Code; and

5.R
Packet Pg. 1015 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jun 11, 2024 5:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) 12 June 11, 2024

4. Direct the City Manager to file the adopted Resolution and Ordinance amending the California Green Building Standards Code with the California Building Standards Commission.

Questions asked and answered of staff included: is this a requirement for new construction; what options are available for existing buildings; who receives the rebate; is there a requirement on the reliability of the charger; is the City legally allowed to require a response time on fixing broken chargers; will any education be provided to consumers; is the City looking into methods to promote panel upgrades that support load-sharing; has the code been updated to allow load-sharing capabilities.

Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Negrete, seconded by Councilmember Torosis, to introduce and hold first reading of the ordinance reading by title only and waiving further reading thereof. The motion was approved by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers Zwick, Parra, Davis, Torosis,
Mayor Pro Tem Negrete, Mayor Brock
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember de la Torre
Motion by Mayor Brock, seconded by Councilmember Torosis, to continue the meeting past 11 P.M.

AYES: Councilmembers Zwick, Parra, Davis, Torosis,
Mayor Pro Tem Negrete, Mayor Brock
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember de la Torre
STAFF

ADMINISTRATIVE
ITEMS:

GENERAL MUNICIPAL

ELECTION

11.A. Adoption of Resolutions related to the General Municipal Election to be held on November 5, 2024, was adopted.

Recommended Action
Staff recommends that City Council adopt:

1. A resolution calling for a General Municipal Election to be held on November 5, 2024; and

2. A resolution requesting that the Municipal Election be consolidated with the Los Angeles (LA) County Statewide General Election and request services from the LA County Registrar-Recorder for the General Municipal Election; and

3. A finding of no possibility of significant effect pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.

Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Negrete, seconded by Councilmember Parra, to

5.R
Packet Pg. 1016 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jun 11, 2024 5:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) 13 June 11, 2024
adopt the staff recommendation. The motion was approved by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers Zwick, Parra, Davis, Torosis,
Mayor Pro Tem Negrete, Mayor Brock
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember de la Torre

COUNCILMEMBER
DISCUSSION ITEMS:

HOUSING AUTHORITY
BOARD

16.A. Appointment to two unscheduled vacancies on the Housing Authority Board for both terms ending on June 30, 2026, was continued to the June 25th meeting.

OPEN STREETS EVENTS 16.B. Request of Councilmember Davis that the City Council approve City sponsorship of Main Street Business Improvement Association’s two Open Street events -- the Summer Soulstice on July 13, 2024 and Day of the Dog on September 7, 2024. City Fees related to the two Open Street events include, but are not limited to, the application, administrative, neighbor notification, temporary traffic control, temporary no parking, public safety and zero waste plan fees associated in an amount up to $16,000.00 of waived fees for both events, was presented.

Motion by Councilmember Davis, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Negrete, to approve the recommendation. The motion was approved by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers Torosis, Davis, Parra, Zwick,
Mayor Pro Tem Negrete, Mayor Brock
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember de la Torre

CITY COUNCIL ETHICS
RULES

16.C. Request of Councilmembers Davis, Torosis, and Zwick that the City Council: 1. Direct the City Attorney to return with a proposal to ensure the City’s ethics rules apply to Councilmembers; 2. Direct the City Attorney to return with a proposal to initiate an investigation into recent leaks of confidential information disclosed in Closed Session; and 3. Direct the City Attorney to return with one or more proposals to impose penalties on Councilmembers and staff who inappropriately leak confidential information out of Closed Session, was presented.

Questions asked and answered of staff included: what would be the cost of an investigation and what funds would be used; what the course of action would be if the investigation revealed someone violated the Brown Act; would consequences be determined under this item; and can complaints be made with the District Attorney’s Public Integrity Division.

5.R
Packet Pg. 1017 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jun 11, 2024 5:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) 14 June 11, 2024
Considerable discussion ensued on topics including, but not limited to:
concerns with potential costs to the City due to these leaks; concerns with weaponizing the City Attorney’s Office for political gain; there is no benefit to enact penalties for violating closed session confidentiality without conducting an investigation to determine violators.

Motion by Councilmember Parra, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Negrete, to reaffirm section 1 and make a friendly amendment to 2nd and 3rd section and add a 4th.

Section 2: Direct the City Attorney to return with a proposal on how to handle future confirmed leaks of information from Closed Session and what the remedy would be.

Section 3: Direct the City Attorney to return with a proposal with how to revise Council rules to include disciplines or penalties for habitual offenses.

Section 4: Direct the City Attorney to return wit ha proposal wit how to handle repeat Brown Act offenses to include discipline or penalties.

Substitute motion by Councilmember Zwick, seconded by Councilmember Davis, to vote on the original Motion, with proposed amendments. The motion failed by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmembers Zwick, Davis, Torosis,
NOES: Councilmember Parra,
Mayor Pro Tem Negrete, Mayor Brock
ABSENT: Councilmember de la Torre
Motion by Councilmember Parra, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Negrete, to reaffirm section 1 and to amend sections 2, 3, and 4 as follows:

Section 2: Direct the City Attorney to return with a proposal on how to handle future confirmed leaks of information from Closed Session and what the remedy would be.

Section 3: Direct the City Attorney to return with a proposal with how to revise Council rules to include disciplines or penalties for habitual offenses.

Section 4: Direct the City Attorney to return wit ha proposal wit how to handle repeat Brown Act offenses to include discipline or penalties.

Motion passed by the following roll call vote.

5.R
Packet Pg. 1018 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jun 11, 2024 5:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) 15 June 11, 2024
AYES: Councilmembers Torosis, Davis, Parra, Zwick,
Mayor Pro Tem Negrete, Mayor Brock
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember de la Torre
ADJOURNMENT On order of the Mayor, the City Council meeting adjourned at 12:01 A.M. in memory of Reverand James Lawson.

ATTEST: APPROVED:

Nikima S. Newsome Phil Brock
Interim City Clerk Mayor

5.R
Packet Pg. 1019 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jun 11, 2024 5:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) 1 July 23, 2024
(NOT APPROVED)

CITY OF SANTA MONICA

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JULY 23, 2024
A regular meeting of the Santa Monica City Council was called to order by Mayor Brock at 5:32 p.m., on Tuesday, July 23, 2024, at City Council Chambers, 1685 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA.

Roll Call: Present: Mayor Phil Brock
Mayor Pro Tem Lana Negrete (Arrived at 7:48 p.m.)
Councilmember Gleam Davis
Councilmember Oscar de la Torre
Councilmember Christine Parra
Councilmember Caroline Torosis (Arrived at 5:46 p.m.)
Councilmember Jesse Zwick (Arrived at 5:39 p.m.)
Also Present: City Manager David White
City Attorney Douglas Sloan
City Clerk Nikima S. Newsome
CONVENE/PLEDGE On order of the Mayor, the City Council convened at 5:32 p.m., with all members present except Councilmembers Zwick, Torosis, and Mayor Pro Tem Negrete. Assistant City Manager Susan Cline led the assemblage in the Pledge of Allegiance.

LEVINE ACT

Participants and agents are requested to make this disclosure as well.

No recusals were made pursuant to the Levine Act.

AGENDA

MANAGEMENT
Item 5.A. was removed from the Consent Calendar to be heard in conjunction with Item 10.B. at the request of staff.

Motion by Mayor Brock, seconded by Councilmember Parra, to hear

5.S
Packet Pg. 1020 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jul 23, 2024 5:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) 2 July 23, 2024
Special Agenda Items before General Public Input was approved unanimously by voice vote with Councilmembers Zwick, Torosis, and Mayor Pro Tem Negrete absent.

GENERAL PUBLIC
INPUT:
(Councilmember Torosis
arrived at 5:46 p.m.)
Members of the public Molly Silk; Christopher Lutz; Jerry Rubin; Wade Kelley; Denise Barton; Willie; Johnathan Foster; and Zoe Muntaner commented on various local issues.

PUBLIC INPUT FOR

CLOSED SESSION,

SPECIAL AGENDA

ITEMS AND CONSENT
CALENDAR ONLY:

Member of the public Zoe Muntaner commented on closed session items.

No members of the public commented on special agenda items.

Members of the public Carol Lemlein; Bea Nemlaha; and Zoe Muntaner commented on consent calendar items.

PROCLAMATIONS/

COMMENDATIONS/

SPECIAL AGENDA
ITEMS
(Councilmember Zwick
arrived at 5:39 p.m.)

3.A. Commendation: Fedora Primo, was presented.

3.B. Commendation: Officers Dilworth and Pike, was presented.

3.C. City Manager Report, was presented.

CLOSED SESSIONS On order of the Mayor, the City Council recessed at 6:13 p.m., to consider closed sessions and returned at 7:22 p.m., with all members present, to report the following:

4.A. Conference with legal counsel - existing litigation - Gov. Code §54956.9(d)(1): Rebecca de la Cruz v. City; LASC Case No. 20STCV01487.

The City Attorney advised this matter was heard with no reportable action taken.

4.B. Conference with legal counsel - consider initiation of litigation - Gov. Code §54956.9(d)(4): City v. 3M, Dupont, et al., regarding PFAS contamination.

The City Attorney advised this matter was heard with no reportable action taken.

4.C. Conference with legal counsel - consider joining amicus brief - Gov. Code §54956.9(d)(4): California Apartment Association, et al., v.

City of Pasadena, et al., B329883.

5.S
Packet Pg. 1021 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jul 23, 2024 5:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) 3 July 23, 2024
The City Attorney advised Council agreed to join the amicus brief by a vote of 6-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Negrete absent from the meeting.

4.D. Conference with real estate negotiator - Gov. Code §54956.8:
properties: 1636 5th Street (Parking Lot 29) (APNs 4290-011-903, 4290-011-904, 4290-011-905); 1636 5th Street (Apple Building) (APN 4290-011-906); Expo Terminus Line parking lot (APNs 4290-011-909, 4290-011-902, 4290-011-901); owner of record: City of Santa Monica; City negotiators: Jennifer Taylor, Economic Development Manager, and Nia Tang, Economic Development Administrator; party to be negotiated with: Alex Pratt, Vice President of Development, AMCAL Multi-Housing, Inc.; under negotiation: price and terms of payment for sale.

The City Attorney advised this matter was heard with no reportable action taken.

4.E. Conference with legal counsel - existing litigation - Gov. Code §54956.9(d)(1): Black Lives Matter Los Angeles, et al. v. City, et al.; USDC Case No. 2:21-cv-05253 [report out only]
The City Attorney advised that this matter was a civil rights class action settled for $2.3 million; Council approved the settlement at the January 23, 2024, meeting with a vote of 7-0.

REPORT ON COUNCIL
TRAVEL
Councilmember Parra reported that she traveled to attend a seminar for the Independent Cities Association. Topics discussed were AI and how it's going to affect and has been affecting crime; public speaking and how to present like a rockstar; the constitutionality of SB 9; and strengthening Cradle to Career ecosystems in your City.

CONSENT CALENDAR: All items were considered and approved in one motion unless removed by a Councilmember for discussion.

At the request of staff, Item 5.A. was removed from the Consent Calendar to be heard in conjunction with Item 10.B.

Motion by Councilmember Davis, seconded by Councilmember Zwick, to approve the Consent Calendar except for Item 5.A., reading resolutions by title only and waiving further reading thereof. The motion was approved by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers de la Torre, Torosis, Davis, Parra, Zwick, Mayor Brock
NOES: None

5.S
Packet Pg. 1022 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jul 23, 2024 5:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) 4 July 23, 2024
ABSENT: Mayor Pro Tem Negrete

TREATMENT PLANT

UPGRADES

5.B. Award Construction Contract for Treatment Plant Upgrades, was approved.

Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt a finding of categorical exemptions pursuant to Section 15301, Section 15302, and Section 15311 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines;

2. Award Bid SP#2684 to Metro Builders & Engineers Group, Ltd. for the construction of the Water Treatment Plant Upgrades Project for the Public Works Department;

3. Award Request for Proposal (RFP) SP#2684 & SP#2678 to MNS Engineers, Inc. to provide construction management and observation services for the Treatment Plant Upgrades Project and the Groundwater Injection Well SM-11i and Monitoring Wells MWi-2 & MWi-3 Drilling and Equipping for the Public Works Department;

4. Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a construction contract with Metro Builders & Engineers Group, Ltd. in an amount not to exceed $9,466,289 (including a 18.9% contingency);

5. Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a construction management agreement with MNS Engineering, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $820,000 for a term of 5 years; and

6. Authorize the Director of Public Works to issue any necessary change orders to the construction contract, to complete additional work within contract authority.

ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE

CONTROL GRANT

5.C. Adoption of Resolution No. 11606 (CCS) Authorizing Acceptance of the 2024-25 Alcoholic Beverage Control Grant, was adopted.

Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt attached Resolution No. 11606 (CCS) authorizing the acceptance of a grant awarded in the amount of $80,229 from the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) for the 2024-25 ABC Grant Program in the Police Department.

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents to accept the grant and all grant renewals, if awarded.

3. Adopt a finding of no possibility of significant effects pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act, and authorize a budget amendment as outlined in the Financial Impacts and Budget Actions section of this report (requires 5 votes).

TURF EQUIPMENT 5.D. Award Sole Source Purchase Order to Stotz Equipment for Provision and Delivery of Turf Equipment, was approved.

5.S
Packet Pg. 1023 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jul 23, 2024 5:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) 5 July 23, 2024
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt a finding of categorical exemption pursuant to Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines; and

2. Authorize the Procurement Manager to issue a purchase order with Stotz Equipment for the provision and delivery of turf equipment and replacement parts for the Public Works Department. This recommended award is made as an exception to the competitive bidding process pursuant to Section 2.24.250(b) and is for a total amount not to exceed $310,000 with future year funding contingent on Council budget approval.

CIVIC CENTER

AUDITORIUM

5.E. Approval of Exclusive Negotiation Agreement with
Revitalization Partners Group, LLC for the Civic Center Auditorium Renovation, Programming and Operation, was approved.

Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Authorize the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute an Exclusive Negotiation Agreement with Revitalization Partners Group, LLC for the renovation, programming, and operation of the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium located at 1855 Main Street.

2. Adopt a finding of no possibility of significant effect pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.

PUBLIC

TRANSPORTATION

AGENCY SAFETY PLAN

5.F. Approval of Revisions to Big Blue Bus’ Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan, was approved.

Recommended Action
Staff Recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt a finding of no possibility of significant effect pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA);

2. Approve revisions to adopted Big Blue Bus’s Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan.

LAND USE

MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

5.G. Award Contract to Speridian Technologies, LLC for
Implementation and Support of a Permitting and Land Use Management System, was approved.

Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

5.S
Packet Pg. 1024 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jul 23, 2024 5:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) 6 July 23, 2024

1. Adopt a finding of no possibility of significant effect pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines;

2. Award RFP# 364 to Speridian Technologies, LLC for a new permitting and land use management system for the Information Services Department;

3. Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute an agreement with Speridian Technologies, LLC, in an amount not to exceed $3,837,353 (including a $348,852 contingency) for five years, with future year funding contingent on Council budget approval.

4. Authorize budget amendments as outlined in the Financial Impacts and Budget Actions section of this report (requires 5 votes).

PUBLIC INPUT ON

REMAINING AGENDA
ITEMS:

Members of the public Jeffrey Hoover, Caro Vilain, Jason Mastbaum, and Jerry Rubin commented on Item 10.B.

Member of the public Denise Barton commented on Item 14.B.

ORDINANCES:

MASSAGE

ESTABLISHMENTS

10.A. Introduction and Adoption of an Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance Extending Interim Zoning Regulations Adopted by Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance 2781 (CCS) to Remove the Minor Use Permit, Location, and Facility Requirements for Massage Establishments from the City’s Personal Service Use Standards for Specific Uses and Activities, was introduced and adopted.

Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt a finding of no possibility of significant effect pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.

2. Introduce and adopt an Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance extending interim zoning regulations adopted by Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance 2781 (CC) amending the text of the Zoning Ordinance to remove the Minor Use Permit, location, and facility requirements for massage establishments from the Personal Service use standards for specific uses and activities contained in Santa Monica Municipal Code Section 9.31.230.

Items 10.B. and 5.A. were heard concurrently.

Questions asked and answered of staff including clarification that this will allow an extension of the interim ordinance to allow for furthermonitoring.

Motion by Councilmember Torosis, seconded by Councilmember Parra, to adopt the ordinance, reading by title only and waiving further reading thereof. The motion was approved by the following vote:

5.S
Packet Pg. 1025 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jul 23, 2024 5:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) 7 July 23, 2024
AYES: Councilmembers de la Torre, Torosis, Davis, Parra, Zwick, Mayor Brock
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mayor Pro Tem Negrete

CONTRACTED SHARED

MOBILITY SERVICE
(Mayor Pro Tem Negrete
arrived at 7:48 p.m.)

PERMANENT SHARED

MOBILITY PROGRAM

5.A. Approval to Reject All Bids for Contracted Shared Mobility Service Providers and Continue the Existing Permit-Based Program with Select Revisions, was presented.

Recommended Action
Staff recommends that Council:

1. Adopt a finding of no possibility of significant effect pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.

2. Reject all bids in RFP #344 Contracted Shared Mobility Services for the Department of Transportation.

Items 5.A and 10.B were heard concurrently.

Motion by Councilmember Torosis, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Negrete, to introduce and hold first reading of the ordinance reading by title only and waiving further reading thereof. The motion was approved by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers Zwick, Parra, Davis, Torosis, de la Torre, Mayor Pro Tem Negrete, Mayor Brock
NOES: None
ABSENT: None

10.B. Introduction for First Reading an Ordinance Repealing Santa Monica Municipal Code (SMMC) Chapter 3.23 and Amending SMMC Chapter 3.22 to Establish a Permanent Shared Mobility Device Program - Item 5.A and 10.B to be heard concurrently, was introduced and held first reading.

Recommended Action
Staff recommends that Council:

1. Adopt a finding of categorical exemption pursuant to Section 15301 and Section 15308 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.

2. Introduce for first reading an ordinance to repeal Santa Monica Municipal Code (SMMC) Chapter 3.23 “Shared Mobility Device Program” and amend SMMC Chapter 3.22 “Second Shared Mobility Device Pilot Program” to update for an on-going permit-based program.

5.S
Packet Pg. 1026 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jul 23, 2024 5:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) 8 July 23, 2024
Questions asked and answered of staff included approving the move from a contractual process to a permit process; how complaints are received; does this process allow for more flexibility; is robust conversation happening around geofences, riding in impermissible areas, and nuisance riding; what led to the change to this program from the previous program; how will the City ensure obtaining a better classification of various mobile devices; how does Santa Monica rank fees/taxes charged to operators; how will renewal/revocation process work; are there any planned incentives to encourage operators to implement parking corrals or parking devices; will Santa Monica be building out the infrastructure to implement Metro bikeshare; are injuries as a result of crashes on mobile devices documented; is it illegal to ride a shared mobility device without a helmet; is it illegal for minors to ride shared mobility devices; have any of the current operators improved their monitoring systems to inhibit minor riders; is there any data on the citations issued to users of shared mobility devices; what are the cost of scooters; is it cheaper for a user to us a scooter vs. an e-bike; how many complaints were received via 311 in 2023; what is the plan to mitigate resident safety concerns with scooters; why has it taken so long to get to this point; did the shift in market and the second pilot impact negotiations; how many operators are being proposed to be permitted; will there be a net number of devices permitted; will number of devices be regulated to eliminate overcrowding on the streets; have community benefits such as discounts been discussed in the negotiation process; can the geofencing technology be regulated and will the operators comply; how many trips are there per year on mobility devices; how many of those trips are replacing car trips; would e-bikes further decrease car trips; how many automobile crashes occurred 2023; is it known as to why crashes on shared mobility devices are going down; will more protected bike lanes assist with safety; does state law prohibit the City from imposing helmet laws for shared mobility riders; what is the average price of ride by Veo and how does it compare to Lyft or Uber; is a docking system being considered to eliminate e-bikes being strewn about; how can illegal bike systems be prohibited from entering the City; how is geofencing being used to keep e-bikes and scooters off the beach bike path, boardwalk, and out of Palisades Park; are they allowed on the bike path; is it a universal ban by ordinance or is imposed on the operators; is there signage to prevent illegal riding on the paths and parks; and would the deployment of devices be based on demand.

Considerable discussion ensued on topics including, but not limited to concerns relating to the implementation of a more robust bike system; parsing out more bikes to scooters; polling of residents to eliminate scooters; and ramping down scooters as a more robust shared mobility program with e-bikes is implemented.

Motion by Councilmember Torosis, seconded by Councilmember Davis, to introduce and hold first reading of the ordinance reading by title only and

5.S
Packet Pg. 1027 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jul 23, 2024 5:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) 9 July 23, 2024
waiving further reading thereof. The motion was approved by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers Zwick, Parra, Davis, Torosis, de la Torre Mayor Pro Tem Negrete, Mayor Brock
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Direction to staff to poll residents regarding utilization and to ramp down scooters as a bike share system is implemented based on utilization data, polling of residents, injury incidents, and 311 complaints.

RESOLUTIONS:

PARKING FACILITY

TAX REVENUE

MEASURE
(Councilmember de la Torre
excused at 9:01 p.m.)
(Councilmember de la Torre
returned at 9:03 p.m.)

14.A. Adoption of Resolution No. 11607 (CCS) to place a Parking Facility Tax revenue measure on the November 2024 Ballot, was adopted.

Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt a finding of no possibility of significant effect pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines;

2. Adopt Resolution No. 11607 (CCS) to place a measure on the November 5, 2024, General Municipal Election Ballot to increase the City’s Parking Facility Tax rate by 8% and exempt City-owned lots and structures from the tax increase (Attachment A), which would be accompanied by an advisory measure that would allow voters to express their preference that at least half of the additional revenue generated by the Parking Facility Tax Measure should be allocated to address public safety and homelessness; and

3. Identify Council Members, if any, who wish to prepare arguments for or against the Parking Facility Tax measure or the accompanying advisory measure.

Questions asked and answered of staff included does an advisory measure require an advisory committee; is the funding intended to be spent according to the advisory measure spent as such; when would generated revenue be seen; how will it be allocated; can the discussion regarding the allocation of funds take place prior to the funds being generated at a study session in the fall; and can the language of the measure be amended to enhance public safety to place emphasis on the intended use of the funds.

Considerable discussion ensued on topics including, but not limited to meeting budget shortfalls pertaining to public safety; use of receipt of insurance funds to offset budget shortfalls; advisory measure reflecting will of the voters; and requesting letters for the measure that reflect the intent of the measure.

5.S
Packet Pg. 1028 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jul 23, 2024 5:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) 10 July 23, 2024
Motion by Councilmember Davis, seconded by Councilmember Torosis, to adopt the staff recommendation. The motion was approved by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers de la Torre, Torosis, Davis, Parra, Zwick Mayor Pro Tem Negrete, Mayor Brock
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Councilmember Zwick was selected to draft the arguments in favor of the measures. The due date for the arguments for and against is August 6. 2024.

Direction to staff to return in the Fall with a study session regarding the allocation and use of the funds to be generated from the measure(s).

SIGN PLACEMENT
(Councilmember de la Torre
excused at 9:40 p.m.)

14.B. Adoption of Resolution No. 11608 (CCS) Disapproving Signs Placed on the Third Street Promenade, was adopted.

Recommended Action
Offered for City Council consideration is a Resolution expressing the Council’s disapproval of signs placed on the Third Street Promenade brought pursuant to a Council 16 Item.

Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Negrete, seconded by Councilmember Torosis, to adopt the staff recommendation. The motion was approved by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers Torosis, Davis, Parra, Zwick,
Mayor Pro Tem Negrete, Mayor Brock
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember de la Torre

COUNCILMEMBER
DISCUSSION ITEMS:

VOTING DELEGATE

DESIGNATION

16.A. Designation of voting delegate and alternate(s) for the League of California Cities Annual Conference and Expo, to be held October 16 - 18, 2024, in Long Beach, California, was heard.

Motion by Mayor Brock, seconded by Councilmember Zwick to select Mayor Brock the voting delegate and Mayor Pro Tem Negrete as the alternate. The motion was approved by voice vote with all members present except Councilmember de la Torre.

GRATITUITIES BAN 16.B. Request of Mayor Brock and Councilmember Davis that the City Attorney return at the next meeting with his proposals (included in the staff report for the July 9 meeting) to address the recent U. S.

5.S
Packet Pg. 1029 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jul 23, 2024 5:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) 11 July 23, 2024
Supreme Court decision in Snyder which, absent a clear ban on gratuities by a local jurisdiction, purports to allow city officials to accept gratuities. This item was not addressed by Council at its last meeting, was heard.

Motion by Councilmember Parra, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Negrete, to approve the recommendation. The motion was approved by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers Zwick, Parra, Davis, Torosis,
Mayor Pro Tem Negrete, Mayor Brock
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember de la Torre
ADJOURNMENT On order of the Mayor, the City Council meeting adjourned at 9:54 p.m.

ATTEST: APPROVED:

Nikima S. Newsome Phil Brock
City Clerk Mayor

5.S
Packet Pg. 1030 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jul 23, 2024 5:30 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: August 27, 2024
Agenda Item: 7.A
1 of 15
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Rick Valte, Public Works Director, Public Works, Office of Sustainability & the Environment
Subject: Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that City Council:

1. Provide direction on project elements such as community outreach/engagement, project scale, placement, and other necessary project elements;

2. Review and comment on the high-level plans set forth for the expansion of Santa Monica’s beach dune network; and

3. Provide direction on the creation of a specific plan related to the SaMo3 project, beach dune master plan or sea level rise mitigation plan.

Executive Summary
As per City Council (Council) authorization on May 24, 2016, the City of Santa Monica (City) entered a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with The Bay Foundation (TBF) to conduct a pilot restoration of a three-acre portion of Santa Monica beach. In December of 2016, the Santa Monica beach dune restoration pilot project was installed and subsequently underwent adaptive management and monitoring until the conclusion of those activities in 2021. The pilot project was successful in demonstrating the potential for low-cost natural solutions, such as beach restoration, to bring significant ecological and resilience benefits to Santa Monica’s coastline.

In January of 2024, the original MOU from the pilot project was amended to include a scope of work for an additional 5-acre expansion of dune restoration south of the existing pilot site on north Santa Monica beach. This Phase 2 (SaMo2) project was

7.A
Packet Pg. 1031
2 of 15
installed in March of 2024 by TBF and will undergo a 5-year monitoring and adaptive management program similar to the pilot project.

To further demonstrate low-cost natural coastal adaptation solutions in the face of climate vulnerabilities such as sea level rise and coastal flooding, staff proposes an expanded beach dune restoration scenario across Santa Monica beach as a Phase 3 of this project (SaMo3). The goal of this study session is to seek Council direction on various details of the proposed scenario, related community/stakeholder outreach efforts and guidance on related planning elements to support the successful implementation of the next phase of this project.

Background
Benefits of Beach Dune Restoration
Santa Monica beach is one of the most heavily used beaches in California, with over 17 million visitors every year. As the last line of defense between the ocean and urban landscape, Santa Monica beach is a uniquely situated resource. Southern California beaches are highly sensitive and are easily impacted by threats such as: native species removal and extinction, erosion, non-natural sediment and sand transport, pollution, and loss of natural structure due to daily vegetation and topsoil removal through grooming and other regular beach maintenance. As a vital buffer, beaches and beach dunes offer protection to homes, roads, and critical infrastructure (bike paths, telephone lines, parks, etc.) from sea level rise as well as natural tidal and wave fluctuations. Natural beach habitats and dune systems regulate sand transport to create resilient beaches, which better adapt to climate change impacts.

Santa Monica beach, and other beaches in LA County/Southern California, have been subjected to the continuous removal of natural features over many years. Mechanical maintenance, the construction of harbors and breakwaters, coastal infrastructure, piers, and other developments have interrupted physical and biological processes of natural beach and dune ecosystems. To draw more tourists to Santa Monica beach, grooming was implemented long ago to create bigger, flatter, more aesthetic beaches. Santa Monica grooms its beaches more frequently than many other beaches throughout the

7.A
Packet Pg. 1032
3 of 15
state to maintain this aesthetic and remove debris. On the other hand, ungroomed beaches have developed natural features such as low dunes away from active recreations areas. These features not only support native, endemic species of plants and animals, they also provide a natural, cost-effective buffer to storm surges and other predictable threats, including sea level rise and increased erosion.

Southern California beaches, such as Santa Monica beach, provide habitat for many birds and animal species, including federally-designated “critical habitat” for the threatened Western Snowy Plover. In addition to providing habitat for birds and animals, coastal strand ecosystems have diverse native vegetation communities and provide a vital habitat for invertebrate species. The current condition of Santa Monica beach’s groomed and flattened sand with removed vegetation provides almost no habitat value for these species. Without vegetation, erosion is more frequent and there is no system in place to promote sand build-up.

7.A
Packet Pg. 1033
4 of 15
History of the Santa Monica Beach Restoration Pilot Project and SaMo2 In 2016, Council authorized an agreement (Attachment A) between the City and The Bay Foundation (TBF) to conduct a pilot restoration of a three-acre portion of Santa Monica State Beach (Figures 1 and 2).

Figure 1. Santa Monica Beach Restoration Pilot site plans

7.A
Packet Pg. 1034
5 of 15
Figure 2. Aerial rendering of Santa Monica Beach Restoration Pilot The pilot project restored approximately three acres of sandy coastal habitats located on the beaches of Santa Monica by utilizing existing sediments to transform a portion of the current beach into a sustainable coastal strand and foredune habitat complex resilient to sea level rise.

In December of 2016, the Santa Monica beach dune restoration pilot was implemented.

This included the installation of fencing and seeding of native coastal strand vegetation species. The project was then physically and biologically monitored over the next 5 years.

In December 2021, TBF released the final Year 5 annual report (Attachment B) for the Santa Monica Beach Restoration Pilot Project summarizing activities and findings from December 2015-October 2021. As stated in the year 5 report on page 1, “The project positively engaged the public, created new partnerships and outreach connections, restricted grooming in a 3.25-acre area, allowed vegetation to grow, encouraged sand hummocks (small dunes) to form along fence lines and within the project area, provided

7.A
Packet Pg. 1035
6 of 15
comprehensive science-based monitoring data to inform nature-based beach restoration solutions, and is bringing back a rare coastal habitat type to the Los Angeles region.”
In 2021, TBF secured funding from the Refugio Beach Oil Spill Settlement through the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation to pursue an additional beach restoration project in Santa Monica (SaMo2). This project builds on the pilot project by restoring an additional 5 acres of sandy coastal habitats (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Aerial perspective of the latest site plans for the SaMo 2 Beach Dune Restoration Project The SaMo2 project is located 500m south of the existing pilot site and expands around the existing Snowy Plover enclosure (Image 4).

7.A
Packet Pg. 1036
7 of 15
Image 4. View of recently installed NW restoration polygon at SaMo2 site.

Stakeholder Outreach
Significant public outreach took place to solicit stakeholder feedback on various elements during the project development stage of both the pilot project and SaMo2.

During phase 1 (pilot project) stakeholder outreach, members of the public, as well as key stakeholder organizations had multiple opportunities to provide feedback on the project and suggested changes that were included in the design. Since its completion in 2021, the project has been featured in scientific articles and in the press. Most notably, Johnston et al. 2023 (Using Dune Restoration on an Urban Beach as a Coastal Resilience Approach) was published in Frontiers in Marine Science in July of 2023 and was featured in the USCB Current newspaper. In October 2023, the LA Times wrote an op-ed highlighting the importance of natural coastal restoration efforts.

In 2022 and 2023, the SaMo2 project entered the planning, design and permitting phase. Like the pilot project, multiple public meetings were held to gather input from organizational and residential stakeholders.

In January of 2024, the previously approved MOU from the pilot project was amended as a Contractual Services Agreement to include the Scope of Work for the SaMo2

7.A
Packet Pg. 1037
8 of 15
project (Attachment C). This agreement terminates in 2027, with 5 one-year renewal options. In early 2024, an updated Coastal Development Permit application was submitted by the City of Santa Monica to the California Coastal Commission (CCC). In addition, the Commission on Sustainability, the Environment and Environmental Justice provided a letter of support for the project to the CCC (Attachment D). The project was listed on the March 2024 CCC meeting agenda as an immaterial amendment and was unanimously approved by the CCC. The project was then installed by the Bay Foundation on March 14th.

The pilot project has served as a valuable proof of concept for scalable, low-cost natural solutions to adapt to climate change and associated hazards. The SaMo2 project is expected to deliver similar results over the next 5 years. In addition to being the first line of defense for the coast, the public benefits of these projects include beautifying the developed coastline, educating the public about the importance of natural landscapes, and promoting tourism based on environmental values. Perhaps most importantly, these projects have served as examples of strategies that balance priorities of both climate action/adaptation and public recreational use.

It is certain that Santa Monica and other coastal cities in California will experience some degree of sea level rise and coastal flooding. To protect the coastline, while delivering additional ecosystem services, staff have determined that scaling beach dune restoration across Santa Monica beach must be prioritized to meet climate goals.

Discussion
Santa Monica’s Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP - 2019) (Attachment E) and Climate Vulnerability Assessment (2017) (Attachment F) both identify coastal sea level rise and flooding as one of Santa Monica’s most substantial climate threats. The CAAP outlines the enhancement of natural systems to prevent coastal flooding as a priority objective. Action CF5 in the CAAP lists beach nourishment and dune creation to allow for these types of projects to take place on beaches within the City. As we move towards the future, the magnitude and frequency of coastal flooding events is expected to increase, with latest guidance suggesting that California may see anywhere from .5 to

7.A
Packet Pg. 1038
9 of 15

1.2 feet (.15 - .36 meters) of sea level rise by 20501. As an adaptive and preventative measure, low-cost natural solutions to improve coastal resilience, such as beach dunes, have become a vital tool to combat vulnerabilities brought by Climate Change.

Project Overview
Based on the success of the 3.25-acre installation of phase 1 in Santa Monica, and the recent installation of 5-acres as ‘SaMo2’, the City of Santa Monica is partnering with The Bay Foundation with the intention of installing an additional 43 acres of coastal sand dunes with California native vegetation on Santa Monica State Beach. The proposed project will consist of a checkerboard-type footprint of smaller polygons, ranging from one to two acres in size, spanning the beach from the border with Will Rogers State Beach to the border with Venice Beach. To balance the need for recreational space and access to the shore with conservation and coastal resilience, some of the polygons will be near the shoreline and the other polygons will form a back dune habitat adjacent to the bike path, parking lots and the upper portions of storm drain outfalls. The project is fully funded by State legislative appropriation to The Bay Foundation, with funds managed by the State Coastal Conservancy. The Bay Foundation will lead development and implementation of the project, while, as the land manager, the City holds authority to make final decisions on project design, placement, stakeholder outreach, coastal permitting, etc.

The Office of Sustainability and the Environment Division of Public Works has been working with TBF to develop a draft site plan option for the SaMo3 project. This expanded dune restoration scenario, as outlined below, will bring significant, longlasting ecological and coastal resilience benefits to the City of Santa Monica. The proposed site plan balances priorities of public recreation and existing use space while maximizing restored area. Staff is seeking Council direction on planning/design components of the restoration scenario listed below.
1 California Ocean Protection Council (OPC), “State of California Sea Level Rise Guidance: 2024 Science and Policy Update”, (2024).

7.A
Packet Pg. 1039
10 of 15
The work plan for this dune creation project will involve a sequential approach every six months, along 4 areas (10-13 acres/area) of the coastline within City borders. Each phase of this dune project will consist of six components: 1) area delineation and implementation, using a minimalist post-and-rope boundary approach to define polygons and pedestrian pathways and minimal use of sand fencing, followed by the introduction of California native dune vegetation species from a CCC-approved palette with seed and container stock, 2) using standardized and regularly scheduled dune monitoring protocols to measure success and inform adaptive management (supplementing seed and container stock), and regular maintenance, such as weeding and litter removal, 3) community outreach using engaging signage and social media, 4) public engagement by way of regularly scheduled volunteer events for the duration of the grant (2.5yrs) with the possibility of the City extending the volunteer program into the future, 5) educational opportunities for all levels of students, and 6) basic and applied research to improve understanding of dune creation, sand accumulation and the associated dynamism.

Stakeholder Outreach
Extensive outreach will be conducted prior to and through project implementation through a series of meetings, stakeholder workshops, and public field trips. Once feedback is received from stakeholders and Council, adjustments to the final site footprint will be made. A first round of stakeholder meetings is currently ongoing with the public agencies, such as State Parks, LA County Department of Beaches and Harbors, LA County Lifeguards, Santa Monica Police, Santa Monica Public Works staff and local tribes. Also included in this round of stakeholder meetings are other elected officials (neighborhood, County, State, Federal), and organizations, including USC Sea Grant, Surfrider Foundation, State and local chapters of Audubon, and Heal the Bay. A community handout will be published and distributed to the above stakeholders, describing the importance of sand dunes for coastal resilience and biodiversity, and a map of the proposed footprint.

Once initial stakeholder feedback is received, a second round of outreach will be held, which will be specifically for community members, business owners and other users of

7.A
Packet Pg. 1040
11 of 15
the Santa Monica beach in the broader Los Angeles vicinity. This will be held in-person in a local, accessible location and virtually to maximize outreach to the public. In both settings, a slide show demonstrating the benefits, with photos of successful Santa Monica dunes and the footprint, with renderings for scale and color, will be presented.

Further, an online comment period will be conducted to provide community members with the opportunity to contribute to this stage of the project.

Ultimately, the final footprint of the project will be adjusted after the input of each of these three rounds of outreach.

Project Benefits
In addition to providing habitat for wildlife and beautifying beaches, dune systems accumulate and sequester sand as plants mature, resulting in structures that are resistant to erosion. The erosive threats of sea level rise and intensifying storms leave mechanically groomed beaches vulnerable to erosion. Dune vegetation builds dunes that resist such erosive forces with a remarkable resilience. The vegetation in the dunes at the forefront of phase 1 of the dunes project, namely saltbush (Atriplex leucophylla, Amaranthaceae), have exhibited post-disturbance recovery accompanied by sand replacement. As such, with the development of the smaller “embryo” dunes coupled with the increased elevation of the foredunes, the natural “softscape” of sand dunes will greatly improve coastal resilience, and the long-term benefits of habitat availability to coastal wildlife, including for sensitive species. Dunes will also create a natural buffer between the ocean and beachfront homes and municipal infrastructure.

The proposed project will increase biodiversity by installing California native coastal dune vegetation, from a previously approved species palette to an otherwise highly disturbed sandy beach. While none of the species on the plant palette are special-status plants, the coastal dune vegetation of southern California is among the rarest in the region. After installing the perimeter of the dunes and during the stormy season, natural driftwood and seashells will be placed into the restoration areas. The driftwood would add natural character to the site, contribute to sand accumulation and dune formation, and provide microhabitats for additional wildlife.

7.A
Packet Pg. 1041
12 of 15
Substantial increases in the diversity of native flora and fauna are expected. This coastal dune plant community would attract a wide array of additional wildlife, from invertebrates such as spiders, beetles, and butterflies to the potential for the California legless lizard, and birds, several of which are species of interest. Nesting shorebirds, such as the western Snowy Plover and the California Least Tern, will benefit by the increase in protected roosting and nesting sites, and in the back dune restoration areas, with the addition of sea cliff buckwheat the host plant for the federally endangered El Segundo Blue butterfly will be provided.

SaMo3 Site Plan – Total Area = 43 Acres
Figure 4a. Aerial view of proposed site map for SaMo3 on North Santa Monica Beach

7.A
Packet Pg. 1042
13 of 15
Figure 4b. Aerial view of proposed site map for SaMo3 on South Santa Monica Beach.

SaMo3 Site Plan (Figures 4a & 4b): The proposed footprint has a total of 43 acres and strikes a balance between shoreline and back beach restoration zones. This scenario offers both benefits of maximized shoreline protection, shoreline access, storm drain beautification, and wildlife considerations, while leaving plenty of recreational space and maintaining existing resources, such as volleyball courts and permitted use sites. For all maps, peak summer umbrella density was used as an overlay and beach parking lot visitation is color coded for total occupancy during peak summer months. The maps also display existing permitted beach use and sports areas, ensuring that these locations are not impacted. The hatched area north of the Santa Monica Pier adjacent to lot 1550 is subject to further updates pending Olympic volleyball planning. On the south side of the pier, the area near Barnard way features four polygons with pathways representing North, South, East and West.

7.A
Packet Pg. 1043
14 of 15
On the westward facing edges of each shoreline polygon, it is important to consider that these areas will not be fenced, and that the area in between the ocean and west edges of polygons will maintain existing use as recreational space. This scenario considers the need for restoring portions of the beach, while adjusting for heavily used beach recreation areas and leaving them open for public enjoyment. Project-specific benefits include:
• Protection for bird species, including the Western Snowy Plover • Beautified bike path area protected from sand accumulation • Sufficient spacing for emergency vehicles and beach maintenance teams • Designated areas for interpretive experiences for the public • Maximized shoreline recreation space and access from key points such as parking areas and walkways including ADA access
Environmental Review
The Phase 3 Dunes Restoration Project is statutorily exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 21080.56 of the Public Resources Code, which exempts a project to restore or provide habitat for California native fish and wildlife meeting certain requirements. On June 20, 2024, the City submitted a concurrence request to the Director of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.56, subdivision (e). The request seeks the CDFW Director's concurrence with the City’s determination on June 20, 2024, that the Project meets certain qualifying criteria set forth in Section 21080.56 of the Public Resources Code.

On August 2, 2024, the CDFW Director concurred with the City’s determination that the Project meets the qualifying criteria set forth in Public Resources Code section 21080.56, subdivisions (a) to (d), inclusive (Concurrence). Specifically, the CDFW Director concurred with the City that the Project meets all of the following conditions: (1) the Project is exclusively to conserve, restore, protect, or enhance, and assist in the recovery of California native fish and wildlife, and the habitat upon which they depend; or is exclusively to restore or provide habitat for California native fish and wildlife; (2) the

7.A
Packet Pg. 1044
15 of 15
Project may have public benefits incidental to the Project’s fundamental purpose; (3) the Project will result in long-term net benefits to climate resiliency, biodiversity, and sensitive species recovery; and includes procedures and ongoing management for the protection of the environment; and (4) Project construction activities are solely related to habitat restoration. This concurrence is posted online at https://wildlife.ca.gov/Notices/CEQA.

Therefore, the Project is statutorily exempt and no further environmental review is necessary.

Financial Impacts and Budget Actions
There is no immediate financial impact or budget action necessary as a result of recommended action. Staff will return to Council if specific budget actions are required in the future.

Prepared By: Nico Predock, Sustainability Analyst
Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:

A. Staff Report MOU for Beach Dune Restoration Pilot Project (1) B. SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1)
C. City_of_Santa_Monica_CSA_Bay_Foundation_SaMo2_1-9-24_FINAL.docx D. BeachDune2.0 Letter of Support (1)
E. CAAP_SantaMonica
F. Santa_Monica_Vulnerability_Assessment
G. Written Comments
H. PowerPoint Presentation

7.A
Packet Pg. 1045
City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: May 24, 2016
Agenda Item: 3.K
1 of 5
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Dean Kubani, Sustainability Manager, Office of Sustainability & the Environment
Subject: Memorandum Of Understanding for Beach Dune Restoration Pilot Project Recommended Action
Staff recommends that City Council authorize the City Manager to negotiate and enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with The Bay Foundation to conduct a pilot restoration of a three acre portion of Santa Monica State Beach.

Executive Summary
The Bay Foundation is proposing to complete a pilot project involving the passive restoration of a three acre portion of Santa Monica Beach with the intent to restore native plant and animal species and demonstrate a low-cost, natural approach to address future sea level rise and coastal flooding related to climate change. This project would be fully funded and implemented by The Bay Foundation with guidance provided by City staff. The Memorandum of Understanding (Attachment 1) outlines the terms and conditions that The Bay Foundation would need to meet in order to proceed with the project. There is no financial or budgetary impact to the City from entering into the Memorandum of Understanding with The Bay Foundation.

Background
Over 17 million visitors frequent the beaches of Santa Monica every year. Southern California beach systems and associated wildlife are highly impacted by threats, including native species extirpation and extinction, erosion, non-natural sediment and sand transport through mechanical means, pollution, and loss of natural morphology due to daily vegetation and top soil removal through grooming and other regular maintenance. However, these systems also offer essentially the last line of defense in terms of natural “softscape” protection. As a vital part of the coastline, beaches and dunes support and protect homes, roads, and infrastructure, providing a natural buffer from sea level rise (SLR) as well as from tidal and wave action from the ocean. Beach habitats and dunes are critical in managing sand transport to create resilient beach morphologies, which naturally adapt to climate change impacts.

Since the 1960s, beaches in the Los Angeles area, including Santa Monica State Beach, have been subjected to the continuous removal of natural features. Mechanical maintenance of beaches has significant impacts on the physical and biological

7.A.a
Packet Pg. 1046 Attachment: Staff Report MOU for Beach Dune Restoration Pilot Project (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) 2 of 5
processes of natural beach and dune ecosystems. Over much of the state, and in many parts of the country, beaches are not frequently groomed, but are instead allowed to develop natural features such as low dunes away from active recreation areas. These features not only support native, and in many cases, rare and endemic species of plants and animals, they also provide a cost-effective buffer to storm surges and other regular, predictable threats, including SLR and increased erosion.

In addition to providing habitat for birds and other animals, including federallydesignated “critical habitat” for the threatened western snowy plover, coastal strand habitats have a varied native vegetation community and provide a vital habitat for invertebrate species. Thus, the current condition of groomed and flattened sand with vegetation removed provides almost no habitat value and removes all of the ecosystem services. Without vegetation, erosion is more frequent and there is nothing to trap winddriven transport of sand.

Discussion
The Bay Foundation (TBF), a 501(c)3 non-profit organization founded in 1990 to restore and enhance Santa Monica Bay and local coastal waters, approached the City of Santa Monica with a proposal to develop a pilot beach dune restoration project to achieve goals of restoring native plant and animal species and demonstrating a low-cost, natural approach to address future sea level rise and coastal flooding related to climate change.

Staff determined that conducting a pilot project on a portion of Santa Monica’s beach could benefit the City by providing a more sheltered habitat for the threatened western snowy plover population that annually winters on Santa Monica’s beaches, and by evaluating a possible model for mitigating impacts of future sea level rise along the city’s coastline. The project would also result in a publicly-accessible natural habitat area on Santa Monica Beach that would provide opportunities for bird watching, science education and passive recreation activities. TBF has obtained support for the pilot project from the California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR), Santa Monica Bay Restoration Commission, University of California, Santa Barbara, Loyola Marymount University, Audubon Society, California Native Plant Society, Heal the Bay, Friends of Ballona Wetlands, several elected officials, and additional expert scientists.

The preferred site for the pilot project is a single contiguous three acre zone of beach located adjacent to the northern City boundary, between the high tide line and the beach bike path and just north of the Annenberg Community Beach House (Attachment 2). This pilot project would involve utilization of existing sediments to passively restore and transform a portion of the current beach into a sustainable coastal strand and foredune habitat complex which would be resilient to sea level rise. It would involve installation of sand fencing around the perimeter of the site and hand seeding of four species of native dune plant species throughout the area. After seeding and planting vegetation, sandy coastal strand habitats and plant hummocks would develop, which

7.A.a
Packet Pg. 1047 Attachment: Staff Report MOU for Beach Dune Restoration Pilot Project (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) 3 of 5
would then begin to support invertebrates and birds. As the vegetation grows it would begin trapping sand transported by wind, naturally increasing the elevation of plant hummocks over time to an estimated height of 2-3 feet. Because beach dunes accrete sediment transported from the ocean they would continue to grow concurrently with rising sea levels. This dynamic process can continue as long as the vegetation community is robust and healthy. This process has repeatedly been demonstrated in pilot projects in other California counties, such as the Surfer’s Point restoration project in Ventura County. Future restored conditions would include no mechanized raking or flattening of the sand and removal of vegetation, however the site would continue to be accessible to the public via pathways and from the shoreline.

All funding for the project for fencing, signage, seeds and plant materials and other project expenses would be provided by TBF. Permitting, implementation, and postrestoration maintenance and monitoring would also be coordinated and conducted by TBF. TBF would consult with the City of Santa Monica on all project logistics, design and implementation and would not proceed without City approval. TBF would implement a biological, physical, and social monitoring plan before the restoration to collect baseline data, for the duration of the restoration project, and several years afterwards to assess success. Additional “control” data along the adjacent unrestored beach would be collected as part of a before-after-control-impact ecological assessment monitoring program. Data would be collected for up to ten years to evaluate the ecological health of the created coastal strand ecosystem and its potential for long-term adaptation to accelerated rates of sea level rise. Funding for monitoring and maintenance will also be provided by TBF.

Public Outreach
TBF has met with members of the Beach Club, which is directly adjacent to the proposed project site to discuss the project and identify any potential concerns. At that meeting the Beach Club did not identify any significant concerns with the proposed project and expressed general support for it moving ahead. TBF also hosted a public meeting at the Annenberg Community Beach House on April 27, 2016, to which property owners and residents along Pacific Coast Highway, between the project site and the Santa Monica Pier, were invited. Eighteen people including local residents, members of the Audubon Society, Heal the Bay, and other stakeholder groups attended the meeting. Questions and discussion focused on the location of the pilot, accessibility of the site to the public, the types of fencing to be used, and the maintenance and monitoring of the site. No significant concerns were raised regarding the proposed project.

This pilot project has the support of adjacent property owners and other stakeholders and would benefit the City of Santa Monica by restoring native plant and animal

7.A.a
Packet Pg. 1048 Attachment: Staff Report MOU for Beach Dune Restoration Pilot Project (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) 4 of 5
species, demonstrating a low-cost, natural approach to address future sea level rise and coastal flooding related to climate change, and providing a publicly-accessible natural habitat on Santa Monica Beach.

Environmental Analysis
Section 15333 of CEQA Guidelines provides (Class 33) exemption for the maintenance, restoration, enhancement, or protection of habitat (no greater than 5 acres) for fish, plants, or wildlife provided that:
1) There would be no significant adverse impact on endangered, rare, or threatened species or their habitat
2) There are no hazardous materials at or around the project site that may be disturbed or removed, and
3) The project will not result in impacts that are significant when viewed in connection with the effects of past, current, or probable future projects The project consists of the utilization of existing sediments to passively restore and transform approximately 3 acres of the current beach into a sustainable coastal strand and dune habitat complex which would be resilient to sea level rise. The project would result in a beneficial impact on wildlife and would not result in the disturbance or removal of hazardous materials at the site. Furthermore, the project will not result signification impacts in combination with other projects. Therefore, this project is a Class 33 project that is categorically exempt per Section 15333 of the CEQA Guidelines.

Financial Impacts and Budget Actions
There is no immediate financial impact or budget action necessary as a result of the recommended action.

Prepared By: Jennifer Simmons, Administrative Staff Assistant Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:

A. MOU for Beach Dune Restoration Project - Attachment 1

7.A.a
Packet Pg. 1049 Attachment: Staff Report MOU for Beach Dune Restoration Pilot Project (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) 5 of 5
B. Admin_Beach Dune Proposed Project Location - Attachment 2

7.A.a
Packet Pg. 1050 Attachment: Staff Report MOU for Beach Dune Restoration Pilot Project (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Santa Monica Beach
Restoration Pilot Project
Year 5 Annual Report
December 2021
Prepared for:

City of Santa Monica
California Coastal Commission
US Environmental Protection Agency
California Department of Parks and Recreation
The Bay Foundation
8117 W. Manchester Ave. #750
Playa Del Rey, CA 90293
(888) 301-2527
www.santamonicabay.org

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1051 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
Santa Monica Beach Restoration Pilot Project
Year 5 Annual Report
December 2021
Prepared by: The Bay Foundation
Prepared for:

City of Santa Monica, California Coastal Commission, US Environmental Protection Agency, California Department of Parks and Recreation
Authors:

Karina Johnston, Chris Enyart, Maggie Jenkins, Dane Lazarus, Sara Cuadra, The Bay Foundation Scientific Contributors:

David Hubbard, Coastal Restoration Consultants, Inc.

Dr. Jenifer Dugan, University of California Santa Barbara Dr. John Dorsey, Loyola Marymount University’s Coastal Research Institute Dan Cooper, Cooper Ecological Monitoring, Inc.

Dr. Karen Martin, Pepperdine University
Dr. Sean Anderson, California State University Channel Islands Dr. Guangyu Wang, Santa Monica Bay Restoration Commission Evyan Sloane, California State Coastal Conservancy
Suggested Citation:

Johnston, K., C. Enyart, M. Jenkins, D. Lazarus, and S. Cuadra. 2021. Santa Monica Beach Restoration Pilot Project: Year 5 Annual Report. Report prepared by The Bay Foundation for City of Santa Monica, California Coastal Commission, US Environmental Protection Agency, and California Department of Parks and Recreation. 118 pages.

Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the US Environmental Protection Agency and the Metabolic Studio (Annenberg Foundation; Grant 15-541) for funding the implementation of this pilot project, and our partners: City of Santa Monica and California Department of Parks and Recreation. Their support has allowed us to explore nature-based protection measures to increase coastal resilience, while bringing back an important coastal habitat to the Los Angeles region. Thanks also to the students and interns with Loyola Marymount University’s Coastal Research Institute who contributed many hours to implementation and monitoring. We would also like to thank the many supporters of this project and members of the public, without whom it would not have happened.

The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the US Environmental Protection Agency or Metabolic Studio, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1052 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
Table of Contents
Executive Summary.......................................................................................................................................1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................3 Background ...............................................................................................................................................3 Project Goals.............................................................................................................................................4 Project Description....................................................................................................................................5 Public Outreach.............................................................................................................................................9 Selected Media Links ..............................................................................................................................12 Permitting ...................................................................................................................................................13 Scientific Monitoring...................................................................................................................................14 Individual Protocols and Results.............................................................................................................14 Wrack Cover........................................................................................................................................16 Vegetation Cover and Seedling Density..............................................................................................20 Vegetation Mapping ...........................................................................................................................29 Invertebrates.......................................................................................................................................33 Avifauna ..............................................................................................................................................34 Grunion and Other Wildlife.................................................................................................................39 Physical Characteristics.......................................................................................................................40 Photo Point .........................................................................................................................................71 Adaptive Management, Maintenance, and Site Use ..................................................................................74 Site Use ...............................................................................................................................................76 Conclusions and Recommendations...........................................................................................................78 Literature Cited...........................................................................................................................................80

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1053 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
List of Figures
Figure 1. Photo of the vegetated dunes in March 2021 on the right in contrast to the groomed beach on the left...........................................................................................................................................................4 Figure 2. Photograph of the project site prior to restoration at Santa Monica Beach, Santa Monica, CA. .6 Figure 3. Map of the Santa Monica Beach Restoration Pilot Project location and general vicinity.............6 Figure 4. Artistic rendering overview of project area, post-establishment of vegetation (rendering credit:

Studio-MLA). .................................................................................................................................................7 Figure 5. Photograph of post-restoration project site in Year 1 (25 January 2017). ....................................8 Figure 6. Photograph of post-restoration project site in Year 5 (11 April 2021)..........................................8 Figure 7. Social media post promoting the project site and Coastal Cleanup Day on 17 September 2020 (left) and soliciting stakeholder feedback on program priorities on 12 February 2021 (right)..................10 Figure 8. Wrack survey transect at the restoration site (left) and control site (right). ..............................17 Figure 9. Average percent cover of wrack by species (top) and trash and terrestrial debris (bottom) in the restoration area and control site across all surveys. Note variable y-axis for each graph.........................18 Figure 10. Photograph of wrack transect at restoration site with primarily bare ground and sparse Phyllospadix sp. on 13 August 2021 (bottom). ...........................................................................................19 Figure 11. Photograph of wrack line with unknown red algae on 30 October 2020..................................19 Figure 12. Photograph of mixed wrack clump comprised of Phyllospadix sp. and an unknown red algae found on 30 October 2020 (left) and photo of Macrocystis pyrifera found on the 21 May 2021 wrack survey (right)...............................................................................................................................................20 Figure 13. Photograph of various vegetation in restoration site. Top left: pink sand verbena; top right:
red sand verbena; bottom left: beach evening-primrose; bottom right: beach salt bush. .......................22 Figure 14. Photograph of various vegetation in restoration site. Top left: woolly heads; top right: nonnative sea rocket; bottom: beach bur sage. ...............................................................................................23 Figure 15. Relative percent cover by species for all transects (live vegetation only, 13-Dec-16 was baseline survey with no vegetation identified). .........................................................................................24 Figure 16. Average absolute native and non-native vegetation cover during all surveys within the restoration area (top) and at the control site (bottom). Asterisk (*) indicates two additional targeted transects surveyed on 17 August 2021.......................................................................................................25 Figure 17. Photograph of various interspersed native vegetation scattered throughout the project site with areas of sandy bare ground (21 May 2021)........................................................................................26 Figure 18. Juvenile beach evening-primrose within quadrat sampling, pencil used for scale. (30 October 2020). ..........................................................................................................................................................28 Figure 19. Absolute native vegetation cover within restoration site for August 2021 survey...................29 Figure 20. Representative photo of project area (13 August 2021). ..........................................................30 Figure 21. Absolute % Cover of red sand verbena (Abronia maritima) (top) and beach bur sage (Ambrosia chamissonis) (bottom), August 2021 survey...............................................................................................31 Figure 22. Absolute % Cover of beach salt bush (Atriplex leucophylla) and beach evening-primrose (Camissoniopsis cheiranthifolia), August 2021 survey................................................................................32 Figure 23. Photograph of researchers conducting invertebrate core surveys (7 March 2019)..................33 Figure 24. Dune beetle identified on vegetation within the restoration area (5 February 2020)..............34 During Year 5, many of the same avifauna species were identified as in previous years, including the California brown pelican (Pelacanus occidentalis californicus) and gulls. Birds were within the restoration

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1054 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
area, adjacent control areas, and nearshore waters both flying over and foraging. Western snowy plovers (Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus) were not observed during the Year 5 targeted avian surveys, but were observed near and within the site during other on-site activities (Figure 25). Additional avifauna surveys will continue to inform the identified species present and activities within and adjacent to the restoration area................................................................................................................................35 Figure 26. Photograph of snowy plovers foraging directly outside of the project area (top) and whimbrels foraging throughout the site (bottom) on 5 February 2020.......................................................................35 Figure 27. Photo within the restoration area from 30 March 2021. ..........................................................36 Dan Cooper, an ornithologist, detected a nesting plover within the restoration area on 18 April 2017 and confirmed the presence of one egg in a nest scrape containing bits of shells and adjacent debris. This confirmed nest was the first one in the Los Angeles region in almost 70 years. Local, state, and federal agencies were all immediately notified along with the Santa Monica Audubon Society, an important local stakeholder group who have conducted bird surveys in Los Angeles for many decades and who maintain the plover enclosure on the southern portion of Santa Monica Beach. On 24 April 2017, US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), who have jurisdiction over federally threatened species, several ornithologists, and TBF installed a mini-enclosure over the nest and confirmed the presence of three eggs. After the mini-enclosure was installed, the male plover immediately returned to the nest (Figure 28).

Unfortunately, over subsequent weeks, extremely high winds buried the nest, which was subsequently abandoned. While plovers were identified within the restoration area in the breeding season in 2018- 2020, no subsequent nesting attempts were made (Figure 28.). Signs were posted around the perimeter of the site notifying the public of possible nesting. Crows and dogs have occasionally been observed and could potentially deter plovers and other shorebirds from using and nesting in the site.........................37 Figure 28. Photograph of nesting western snowy plover (credit: Tom Ryan 24 April 2017)......................37 Figure 29. Map of WSP critical habitat (Subunit CA 45A) and restoration area boundary (Data source:

USFWS ECOS 2018). ....................................................................................................................................38 Figure 30. Dolphin photographed swimming offshore in front of restoration area (5 February 2020).....40 Figure 31. Monthly precipitation totals (inches) for the wet weather months (October-May). Daily precipitation data were downloaded from NOAA Climate Date Online (CDO) and originally recorded at the LAX rain gauge. Asterisk indicates project installation month in December 2016. .............................42 Figure 32. TBF staff and CRI interns conducting an elevation profile survey on 21 May 2021. .................48 Figure 33. Restoration Transect 1 elevation profiles during Winter Beach surveys (Elevation in NAVD88). ....................................................................................................................................................................49 Figure 34. Restoration Transect 1 elevation profiles during Summer Beach surveys (Elevation in NAVD88)......................................................................................................................................................49 Figure 35. Restoration Transect 2 elevation profiles during Winter Beach surveys (Elevation in NAVD88). ....................................................................................................................................................................50 Figure 36. Restoration Transect 2 elevation profiles during Summer Beach surveys (Elevation in NAVD88)......................................................................................................................................................50 Figure 37. Restoration Transect 3 elevation profiles during Winter Beach surveys (Elevation in NAVD88). ....................................................................................................................................................................51 Figure 38. Restoration Transect 3 elevation profiles during Summer Beach surveys (Elevation in NAVD88)......................................................................................................................................................51 Figure 39. Restoration Transect 4 elevation profiles during Winter Beach surveys (Elevation in NAVD88). ....................................................................................................................................................................52

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1055 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
Figure 40. Restoration Transect 4 elevation profiles during Summer Beach surveys (Elevation in NAVD88)......................................................................................................................................................52 Figure 41. Control Transect 1 (non-restored area) elevation profiles during Winter Beach surveys (Elevation in NAVD88).................................................................................................................................53 Figure 42. Control Transect 1 (non-restored area) elevation profiles during Summer Beach surveys (Elevation in NAVD88).................................................................................................................................53 Figure 43. Control transect 2 (non-restored area) elevation profiles during Winter Beach surveys (Elevation in NAVD88).................................................................................................................................54 Figure 44. Control transect 2 (non-restored area) elevation profiles during Summer Beach surveys (Elevation in NAVD88).................................................................................................................................54 Figure 45. Photograph of vegetated dune hummock within the restoration area (13 August 2021)........55 Figure 46. Photographs of vegetated dune hummocks within the restoration area on 21 May 2021 ......56 Figure 47. (cont’d from above) Photographs of vegetated dune hummocks within the restoration area on 21 May 202 ............................................................................................................................................57 Figure 48. Year 1 (top, four months after implementation) and Year 2 topographic map of restoration site...............................................................................................................................................................58 Figure 49. Year 5 topographic map of restoration site. The survey boundary was extended to capture dune buildup along the outside of the fence line.......................................................................................59 Figure 50. Photograph of sand build-up along the northern fence line in the restoration area (top: 9 May 2017, approximately five months after implementation; and bottom: 30 October 2020)........................60 Figure 51. Sand buildup along the south side of the fencing (top) and along the east side of the fencing (bottom) on 30 March 2021. ......................................................................................................................61 Figure 52. Berm topography (top left: 17 December 2016, top right: 25 January 2017, bottom left: 8 March 2018, and bottom right: 13 August 2021). ......................................................................................62 Figure 53. Sand grain in restoration site (left: pebbles; middle: coarse sand; right: medium to very fine sand)............................................................................................................................................................63 Figure 54. Photographs showing larger grains at the base of the dune and finer grains on top due to aeolian processes (top: 29 April 2019; bottom: 5 February 2020).............................................................64 Figure 55. Baseline (top) followed by post-restoration sand grain results for all transects (dry sample averages).....................................................................................................................................................65 Figure 56 (cont’d from above). Post-restoration sand grain results for all transects (dry sample averages). ....................................................................................................................................................................66 Figure 57 (cont’d from above). Post-restoration sand grain results for all transects (dry sample averages). ....................................................................................................................................................................67 Figure 58. Photographs of eroded beach face following a winter king tide on 25 January 2017 (left) and a gentler sloping beach face on 15 August 2018 during summer season (right). .........................................67 Figure 59. Organics (loss on ignition) analysis on sand samples (18 July 2018). ........................................70 Figure 60. Average percent organics in sediment samples by survey date (dry samples only). ................70 Figure 61. Representative site photographs from 21 May 2021 and 17 August 2021 looking north. .......72 Figure 62. Representative photos of the restoration area on 21 May 2021 looking south. ......................73 Figure 63. TBF staff and Marymount High School interns picking up trash as a part of adaptive management on 13 August 2021................................................................................................................75 Figure 64. Human use of the restoration site [top: a family using the symbolic pathway through the middle of the restoration area (15 August 2020); second: summer beach visitors setting their chairs and

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1056 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
towels around the restoration area (15 August 2020); third: beach visitors reading one of the interpretive signs in the restoration area (21 May 2021); bottom: fisherman fishing oceanward of the restoration area (13 August 2021)..............................................................................................................77 List of Tables
Table 1. Summary of key parameters, protocols implemented, and survey dates. Asterisk indicates baseline survey. ..........................................................................................................................................15 Table 2. Seedling data results by species for 24 March 2017, 11 January 2018, and 22 February 2019 reported as counts, average number / m², and extrapolated counts for the entire restoration area (bold rows). Asterisk indicates non-native species..............................................................................................27 Table 3. Avifauna species identified as present in the restoration area and in the surrounding area adjacent to the restoration. Data for all surveys were combined..............................................................36 Table 4. Walker scale for monitoring California grunion runs....................................................................39 Table 5. Results from grunion surveys conducted at the Santa Monica Restoration Site in Year 5...........40 Table 6. Summary data for temperature and wind speed collected on site during surveys. Asterisk indicates NOAA data instead of in situ data due to equipment malfunction (January and February 2020). ....................................................................................................................................................................43 Table 7. Table displaying NOAA temperature and humidity monthly data for the Santa Monica Municipal Airport Station (downloaded on 31 August 2020)......................................................................................44 Table 8. Table displaying NOAA wind speed and precipitation monthly data for the Santa Monica Municipal Airport Station (downloaded on 31 August 2020).....................................................................45 Table 9. Grain size results from December 2016 (baseline) and post-restoration (March 2017, September 2017, May 2018, November 2018, May 2019, November 2019). ..............................................................68

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1057 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
1 Executive Summary
This report summarizes activities for the Santa Monica Beach Restoration Pilot Project from December 2015 through October 2021. The restoration was implemented in two phases over the course of two weeks in December 2016 including the installation of fencing and seeding of native coastal strand vegetation species. For details on the implementation efforts and prior monitoring, please reference prior reports (Johnston et al. 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020). Post-restoration physical and biological monitoring has occurred since 2016 and is completed based on permit requirements and included in this Year 5 Report. As the project was meant to be an experimental pilot for the region, no specific, quantifiable success criteria were set; however, the project can be evaluated against its ability to meet the project goals. The project positively engaged the public, created new partnerships and outreach connections, restricted grooming in an approximately 3-acre area, allowed vegetation to grow, encouraged sand hummocks to form along fence lines and within the project area, provided comprehensive science-based monitoring data to inform nature-based beach restoration solutions, and is bringing back a rare coastal habitat type to the Los Angeles region.

Additionally, the increased functions within the restoration habitat area included benefits to several notable species. Nesting of the federally threatened western snowy plover had not been recorded in the Los Angeles region for almost 70 years, and the first nest for the Los Angeles region was found in April 2017 within the restoration area and contained three eggs. Plovers have been repeatedly identified within and adjacent to the project area throughout all five years, where previously they had not been documented on site. Furthermore, a new native plant species, possibly a rare variant of woolly heads (Nemacaulis denudata), was identified as germinating in the project area in 2017 and was identified in all future years. As the seeds of this species are not sold by the seed provider, it is probable that there was either an existing seed bank for this species already along Santa Monica Beach, or that it was transported by wind, waves, birds, or humans. It was not identified in areas adjacent to the project site.

Another native plant, pink sand verbena (Abronia umbellata) was also identified on site and was not included intentionally by the seed provider. Another biological addition to the restoration project area found in surveys from 2017 through 2021 (but not baseline surveys prior to restoration) were dune beetles, which provided an increased layer of the food web available to foraging birds and wildlife.

Data suggest that the restoration area is considerably different from both the control sites and from itself over time as compared to the baseline surveys, especially for increased vegetation cover and changes in sand morphology. Absolute vegetation cover continues to increase slowly over time, to a maximum in Year 5 of approximately 7% native cover, with patches of dense vegetation interspersed with bare sand, similar to natural coastal strand habitats. Vegetation reaches a maximum of approximately 25% cover adjacent to the fence lines. It is likely that the vegetation community will continue to establish over time, but will probably remain patchy, as is the trend for coastal strand habitats. Elevation data continued to show differences between restoration site transects and controls, with greater topographic complexity and elevation heights in the restoration site. Whereas the groomed control areas were flattened and uniform, the restoration area had small dune hummocks, increases in berm height, and consistent sand retention across seasons and years. Adaptive management in the form of supplemental seeding and fencing is being considered for implementation in future years and will be

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1058 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
2 evaluated as part of a revised adaptive management plan for the application for a Coastal Development Permit amendment to establish the project site as a permanent feature.

The variability of the berm over time and the notable increases in elevation along the fenced perimeters, oceanward berm, and throughout the restoration area surrounding patches of vegetation suggest that longer periods of time for scientific evaluation for these parameters would also allow for additional trends to be defined. If funding is available, future monitoring and research efforts would continue to inform sand topography within the restoration site in response to vegetation growth, fence placement, and seasonal changes. For more information, details, artistic renderings, and links to public documents, reports, and photographs, please visit the project website.

Figure ES- 1. Post-restoration site photographs taken in Year 5 on 30 March and 21 May 2021.

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1059 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
3 Introduction
Background
Over 17 million visitors frequent the beaches of Santa Monica every year. Beaches are broadly recognized and highly valued as cultural and economic resources for coastal regions (Dugan et al. 2015).

However, their value as ecosystems is often less appreciated. Southern California beach systems and associated wildlife are highly impacted by threats, including native species extirpation and extinction, erosion, non-natural sediment and sand transport through mechanical means, pollution, and loss of natural morphology due to daily vegetation and top soil removal through grooming and other regular maintenance (Dugan et al. 2003). However, these systems also offer essentially the last line of defense in terms of nature-based protection as components of a living shoreline. As a vital part of our coastline, beaches and dunes support and protect our homes, roads, and infrastructure, providing a natural buffer from sea level rise (SLR) as well as from tidal and wave action from the ocean. Beach habitats and dunes are critical in managing sand transport to create resilient beach morphologies, which naturally buffer climate change impacts. By restoring natural processes to impacted beach systems, we improve their ecological and utilitarian functions, and serve as a model for similar projects statewide.

Since the 1960s, beaches in the Los Angeles area have been subjected to the continuous removal of natural features as they begin to develop. Mechanical maintenance of beaches has significant impacts on the physical and biological processes of natural beach and dune ecosystems (Dugan et al. 2003, Dugan and Hubbard 2009, Hubbard et al. 2013). Over much of the state, and in many parts of the country, beaches are not frequently groomed, but are instead allowed to develop natural features, such as low dunes away from active recreation areas. These features not only support native, and in many cases, rare and endemic species of plants and animals, they also provide a cost-effective buffer to storm surges and other regular, predictable threats, including SLR and increased erosion.

In addition to providing habitat for avifauna, including Federally designated “Critical Habitat” (US Fish and Wildlife Service) for the threatened western snowy plover (Charadrius nivosus alexandrius), coastal strand habitats have a varied native vegetation community, including species such as red sand verbena (Abronia maritima), beach evening-primrose (Camissoniopsis cheiranthifolia), and beach saltbush (Atriplex leucophylla), and provide a vital habitat for invertebrate species. Thus, the current condition of groomed and flattened sand with vegetation removed for most of the beaches in Los Angeles and the Santa Monica Bay provides almost no habitat value and removes all of the ecosystem services (Dugan et al. 2003, Hubbard et al. 2013, Gilburn 2012). Without vegetation, erosion is more frequent and there is nothing to trap wind-driven aeolian transport of sand (Nordstrom et al. 2011).

Restored conditions of the beach include no mechanized ‘flattening’ of the sand and removal of vegetation. After seeding and planting vegetation, sandy coastal strand habitats and plant hummocks are forming, which then support higher levels of the ecological community (e.g., invertebrates, birds).

Recent scientific literature highlights the need for ecosystem-level, rather than species-level, beach restoration planning to achieve the greatest ecological benefits (e.g., Schlacher et al. 2008). This project represents one example of that model.

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1060 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
4 Project Goals
This pilot project restored approximately three acres of sandy coastal strand habitat located on the beaches of Santa Monica by utilizing existing sediments to transform a portion of the current beach into a sustainable coastal strand and foredune habitat complex resilient to sea level rise. As an alternative to traditional hardscaping options, this project will continue to evaluate a living, restored shoreline with a diverse wildlife community as an alternate approach to combat climate change (Figure 1).

Another project goal was to assist in bringing back a native, diverse, endemic-rich, coastal plant and wildlife community which has been almost completely extirpated from the Los Angeles region. Enabling the return of broad ecosystem functions will create increased protection for coastal infrastructure and residences from sea level rise and erosion while providing a vital refuge for invertebrates, birds, and rare coastal vegetation species.

This demonstration site will also serve as a model for the region, showing that heavy recreational use of beaches and meaningful habitat restoration are not incompatible goals. It continues to provide not only a scientific basis to develop guidelines and protocols but an integrated, locally-based program for increasing the usefulness of natural environments in a developed area. It also evaluates “soft” low-cost nature-based shore protection from sea-level rise and storms while providing public benefits and enhancing natural resource values. All these benefits are also evaluated in the context of existing recreational uses of the beach.

Additional benefits of healthy beach ecosystems include, but are not limited to:
• Enhancing a developed coastline
• Critical habitat for rare coastal strand vegetation and invertebrate species • Habitat for birds, possibly including the threatened western snowy plover • Familiarizing residents, especially children, with a healthy, natural landscape • Promoting tourism through unique aesthetic and bird watching opportunities • Educational opportunities including native plants and healthy beach management practices • Understanding of a ‘soft-scape’ climate change protection project • Natural shoreline protection through buffering and absorption of wave energy • Sea water filtration and food web support
• Detrital processing and nutrient recycling
Figure 1. Photo of the vegetated dunes in March 2021 on the right in contrast to the groomed beach on the left.

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1061 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
5 Project Description
The pilot project of approximately three acres aimed to return a healthy and beautiful ecosystem to Santa Monica State Beach (Figure 2), which in turn, will help evaluate and address climate change issues for both humans and wildlife. This pilot project used low-lying sand fencing and native plant seeds to actively restore approximately two out of three acres of a highly impacted beach system (Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6). The third acre is comprised of the dry and wet sand shore-ward of the project area that remained ungroomed (passive restoration through not raking the sand), and the area immediately adjacent to the perimeter of the sand fence, which also remained ungroomed.

Design aspects feature curved, flowing, low-lying fence lines, a path through the restoration area, and an unenclosed perimeter along the water’s edge – all components requested by various members of the public during the first few months of outreach about the project. Many of these design components were incorporated to minimize disturbance, and even enhance different forms of interactions and recreation along the beach. The site allows visitors to continue to recreate as well as enjoy the local native flora and fauna that are currently absent along the groomed beaches of the Santa Monica Bay.

Specialized coastal strand and foredune vegetation was seeded and continues to grow, develop, and trap sand transported by wind. Wind-driven sand bumps into vegetation, falls, and accretes, naturally increasing the elevation of plant hummocks over time. Additional trapping of sand has occurred through the deployment of sand fencing. Because beach dunes have the potential to accrete sediment transported from the ocean, they could continue to grow concurrently with rising sea levels. This dynamic process can continue as long as the vegetation community remains robust and healthy. This process has repeatedly been demonstrated in the scientific literature as well as in pilot projects in other California counties, such as the Surfer’s Point restoration project in Ventura County.

Pre-restoration monitoring and project implementation began in November and December 2016, and required approximately three weeks, including monitoring. It was followed by post-restoration monitoring for five years. This report details results of the fifth year of monitoring (Year 5). For more information, details, artistic renderings, maps, and links to public documents and photographs, please visit the project website: http://www.santamonicabay.org/santa-monica-beach-restoration-pilot/.

This project would not have been possible without two additional project partners: City of Santa Monica (land managers) and California Department of Parks and Recreation (land owners). We are very grateful for their support and enthusiasm in the implementation of this pilot project. Additionally, we are also grateful for the many proponents and supporters of this project, including but not limited to: Audubon Society – Santa Monica Chapter and Los Angeles Chapter, Loyola Marymount University (LMU), Coastal Research Institute (CRI), University of California Santa Barbara, Cooper Ecological Monitoring, Inc., Coastal Restoration Consultants, Inc., California Native Plant Society, Congress Member Ted Lieu, Assembly Member Richard Bloom, Senator Fran Pavley, Los Angeles World Airports, Friends of Ballona Wetlands, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Heal the Bay, University of Southern California Sea Grant Program, Santa Monica Bay Restoration Commission, Santa Monica Bay National Estuary Program, US Environmental Protection Agency, Patagonia, Council Member Paul Koretz, Girl Scout Troop 10975, Friends of LAX Dunes, Studio-MLA, US Green Building Council – LA, beach managers, and many local residents.

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1062 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
6 Figure 2. Photograph of the project site prior to restoration at Santa Monica Beach, Santa Monica, CA.

Figure 3. Map of the Santa Monica Beach Restoration Pilot Project location and general vicinity.

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1063 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
7 Figure 4. Artistic rendering overview of project area, post-establishment of vegetation (rendering credit: Studio-MLA).

Project
Area
Lifeguard
Tower
Annenberg
Beach House
PCH

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1064 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase Year
5 Annual Report, December 2021
8 Figure 5. Photograph of post-restoration project site in Year 1 (25 January 2017).

Figure6. Photograph of post-restoration project site in Year 5 (11 April 2021).

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1065 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
9 Public Outreach
Significant public outreach has been conducted as part of this project through meetings, events, tours, social media, newspaper articles, newsletters, and a project webpage (Figure 7). Outreach is ongoing and occurs on-site to beach visitors who have questions and through local media. The ability for the public to interact with, learn from, and benefit from this project are vital project goals.

Members of the public had multiple opportunities to provide feedback about the project, and suggested changes were incorporated into the project design. Public-requested components include, but are not limited to, the curved sand fence, a 3-foot maximum fence height, several of the flowering plant species (e.g., red sand verbena), no fence along the open ocean side of the project, and an extra buffer of open space on the ocean-ward side of the project area to allow for pedestrian traffic and lifeguard vehicle emergency access. Additionally, outreach occurred in advance of the application for permitting from the California Coastal Commission, in accordance with permit conditions for the project. More than 20 public meetings, tours, or media articles occurred for this project prior to its implementation. Since implementation in December 2016, many additional news articles and tours have occurred. Additionally, several television segments have also aired, including on KNBC, KCAL, and KSCI.

Several important outreach components occurred for this project through the development of a website that highlighted artistic renderings, photographs, project information, and additional materials. Perhaps even more importantly from an outreach perspective was the installation of two interpretive signs designed to educate visitors on the importance of recreating natural ecosystems as an approach to combat sea level rise and provide vital habitat for plants and wildlife. Both the artistic renderings and interpretive signs were designed by Studio-MLA. Funding for the signs was provided by the Los Angeles County Supervisor District 3 (Sheila Kuehl’s Office) and City of Santa Monica. The project website and frequently asked questions can be found at the following link:
http://www.santamonicabay.org/explore/beaches-dunes-bluffs/beach-restoration/santa-monicabeach-restoration-pilot/. Selected media links are presented below the outreach photographs. The site is frequently written about in local newspapers, blogs, newsletters, and social media postings.

During Years 1-5 following implementation, The Bay Foundation (TBF) staff presented at Beach Ecology Coalition meetings (Southern California stakeholder group), LA County Beach Commission meetings, and a Southern California Living Shorelines workshop. Additional outreach for the project included presentations with the NOAA Coastal Resiliency Network, 9 th National Summit on Coastal and Estuarine
Restoration and Management (December 2018), serving as a key member of a panel with the City of Santa Monica’s LCP and sea level rise event (15 March 2018), a presentation at the Southern California Academy of Sciences annual meeting (3 May 2019), presentations and a video created as part of the California Dune Science Network (December 2021). Tours aimed to engage the community on the impacts of sea level rise have occurred through the Annenberg Community Beach House, the Santa Monica Bay Audubon Society, CRI, Girl Scouts, and others.

The Girl Scouts tour was intended to be a part of a docent tour program where TBF would give site tours and provide outreach and educational materials to local scout troops, who would in turn give tours to the general public. However, implementation of the docent tour program was postponed due to the

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1066 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
10 COVID-19 pandemic. While COVID-19 prohibited some on-site outreach activities during Years 4 and 5, TBF continued to explore and utilize virtual means of outreach, including presentations at the Adapt LA webinar (June 2020), Los Angeles Regional Collaborative for Climate Action and Sustainability (LARC) virtual meeting (May 2020), and City of Santa Monica’s Sustainability Department meeting (July 2020).

Despite on-site outreach activities being limited through Year 5 due to safety concerns associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, TBF continued to find opportunities to share the project and ongoing monitoring results with the public, as well as to beach managers and coastal scientists in the region. One highlight of Year 5 was sharing the progress of the project and how it has informed other Living Shorelines projects on two podcasts, the Dragonfruit Podcast and the American Shore and Beach Podcast (October 2020). TBF also engaged with stakeholders through presentations at the American Shore and Beach Preservation Association Conference (October 2020 and March 2021), Beach Ecology Coalition meeting (January 2021), Society for Ecological Restoration Conference (June 2021), and National Conference on Ecosystem Restoration (July 2021), and by participating in the Los Angeles Snowy Plover meeting (January 2021). The Santa Monica Beach Pilot project was highlighted by the City of Santa Monica in an October 2020 blog post titled, “Santa Monica’s Natural Dune Restoration Project Celebrates 4 Years”, which described project progress to date. A Los Angeles Times article in August 2021 also highlighted the project as a model for the region and discussed the role of dune restoration in buffering impacts to sea level rise and rebuilding California’s historical coastal dunes. Lastly, TBF continues to promote the project through social media and through classes at LMU.

Figure 7. Social media post promoting the project site and Coastal Cleanup Day on 17 September 2020 (left) and soliciting stakeholder feedback on program priorities on 12 February 2021 (right).

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1067 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
11 Figure 8. Photographs taken on 13 August 2021 (top) and 21 May 2021 (bottom) of human use of the project site.

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1068 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
12 Selected Media Links
• KPCC 89.3 interview with Executive Director Tom Ford on 7 December 2016. • Santa Monica Lookout article on 5 December 2016.
• Curbed LA article on 6 December 2016.
• Next City article about the project on 16 March 2017. • City of Santa Monica press release about the ribbon cutting event on 3 May 2017. • Ventura County Star article about the project and plovers on 8 May 2017. • Daily Breeze article about the Western Snowy Plovers nesting on site on 9 May 2017. • KCET article about the project on 9 May 2017.
• Los Angeles Times article about the project and plovers on 10 May 2017. • Santa Monica Daily Press article about the Western Snowy Plovers nesting on 11 May 2017. • The Argonaut article mentioning project in context of sea level rise in LA on 5 July 2017. • Stormwater Solutions article on 10 August 2017.
• Baywire feature Quarter 3 – 2017. The Baywire provides news and updates from the Santa Monica Bay National Estuary Program.
• Baywire feature Quarter 4 – 2017: Annual Report.
• Hakai Magazine (international) article about the pilot project, trash maintenance, and Santa Monica beaches on 31 July 2018.
• KPCC 89.3 interview with Director of Watershed Programs, Melodie Grubbs, on 20 September 2019 highlighting the potential of the project to combat sea level rise. • Dragonfruit Podcast with Science Director, Karina Johnston discussing adapting coastalines, on 29 October 2020.
• American Shore and Beach Podcast with Science Director, Karina Johnston discussing naturebased adaptation to improve coastal resiliency on 30 October 2020. • City of Santa Monica blog post highlighting the project progress through Year 4 posted on 15 October 2020.
• Los Angeles times article mentioning project as a model for other Living Shorelines projects published on 2 August 2021.

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1069 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
13 Permitting
TBF, in coordination with the City of Santa Monica (City) and California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR), obtained the necessary permits to implement the Santa Monica Beach Restoration Pilot Project. Approval from the City at a public City Council meeting in the form of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and restoration site plan stamped and approved by the Planning Department was obtained prior to the submittal of a Coastal Development Permit application to the California Coastal Commission (Commission). Additionally, a CEQA exemption was filed and obtained by the City to implement this project.

In October 2016, the Commission approved permit application No. 5-16-0632 with the following special conditions:
1) An assumption of risk, waiver of liability and indemnity; 2) Limited development authorization period;
3) Dune habitat creation plan;
4) Public access requirements; and
5) Permit compliance.

Permit condition 1 included a waiver signed by the City and DPR. Regarding permit condition 2, CDP No. 5-16-0632 authorizes the approved beach restoration project for a period of five years from the date of Commission action. After such time, the authorization for continuation and active management of the dune habitat shall cease, unless the applicants submit an amendment to this permit, or new CDP application to the Commission, and that amendment or permit is approved, thereby extending the time period for the project. The dune habitat created pursuant to the permit may remain in place. The third permit condition was met by the Implementation and Monitoring Plan and the Site Plan. Permit conditions 4 and 5 were met throughout the duration of the project.

Year 5 marks the conclusion of the initial five-year CDP approval period. Following discussions with Coastal Commission, the City, and public stakeholders and interested entities, TBF and the City have opted to establish the site as a permanent feature of the coastline through a CDP amendment. The partners are currently drafting the CDP amendment application and revised adaptive management plan.

Coordination and communications are ongoing with federal and state agencies with an interest in this project, beach management, and/or wildlife (e.g., US Fish and Wildlife Service). All annual reports for this project will be made publicly available on TBF website: www.santamonicabay.org. For details on the implementation of the project in December 2016 and prior years of summary data, please reference the previous reports on TBF’s website.

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1070 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
14 Scientific Monitoring
Accurate and robust scientific monitoring is a vital part of any restoration project. Monitoring is used to assess successful project implementation; for example, in this project, monitoring accretion rates of sand and elevation changes allowed for an assessment of the success of the project in combating sea level rise. TBF implemented a biological, physical, and human use long-term monitoring plan to quantifiably evaluate the project over five years. Additional “control” data were collected along the adjacent unrestored beach as part of a before-after-control-impact ecological assessment monitoring program. Specialist scientists such as ornithologists and invertebrate biologists are partners in this project and contributed their expertise in implementation of the monitoring program. Data was collected for five years to evaluate the ecological health of the created coastal strand ecosystem and its potential for long-term adaptation to accelerated rates of sea level rise.

The development of the monitoring plan was conducted with input from many scientific advisors throughout southern California (details can be found in the “Implementation and Monitoring Plan” document available on the website). Additionally, data were collected to help inform other projects in southern California evaluating nature-based methods of shoreline protection.

Pre-restoration baseline monitoring occurred in December 2016 prior to the implementation of the seeding component of the restoration project to allow a comparison of the pre- and post-project conditions of the area. Post-restoration monitoring occurred beginning in January 2017. Table 1 summarizes the monitoring sampling design that occurred from the time period 1 December 2016 through 17 August 2021. Table 1 lists ten major parameters, the primary protocol(s) implemented for each parameter, and the frequency of implementation. Additional protocols for management efforts such as trash collection, human use, and invasive vegetation removal are described in the Adaptive Management, Maintenance, and Site Use section of the report, below.

Individual Protocols and Results
Each of the following subsections summarizes the methods of an individual protocol implemented as part of the monitoring program and the associated results. For in depth details on objectives, equipment, field preparation, field methods, quality control check procedures, and datasheets, refer to the individual Standard Operating Procedures listed below within the California Estuarine Wetland Monitoring Manual, publicly available for free download: http://www.santamonicabay.org/californiaestuarine-wetlands-monitoring-manual-level-3/. Additionally, some protocols were adopted from Dugan et al. 2015 Final Report: Baseline Characterization of Sandy Beach Ecosystems along the South Coast of California.

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1071 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
15 Table 1. Summary of key parameters, protocols implemented, and survey dates. Asterisk indicates baseline survey.

Parameter Protocol Survey Dates
Wrack Cover Percent cover and composition
by species
28 December 2016*; 14 February, 12 March, 21 June, 20
September 2017; 11 January, 8 March, 24 May, 15 August, 16 November 2018; 22 February, 21 May, 1 August, 6 November 2019; 5 February,24 July, 27 August, and 30 October 2020; 21 May and 13 August 2021
Vegetation Cover
and Seedling Density
Transects assessing cover by
species; quadrat density counts
13 December 2016*; 24 March, 21 June, 20 September 2017; 11 January, 24 May, 15 August, 14 December 2018; 22 February, 21 May, 1 August, 6 November 2019; 5 February,24 July, 27 August, and 30 October 2020; 21 May, 13 and 17 August 2021
Vegetation Mapping
**
Polygons depicting species
composition (once vegetation
sufficiently established)
4 October 2019; 21 August 2020; 21 May and 17 August 2021 Invertebrates Cores along transects using 1mm
mesh bags as sieve
28 December 2016*; 18 July 2017; 8 March, 15 August 2018; 7 March 2019
Avifauna
Visual presence and behavior
surveys; nesting surveys by
USFWS; plover surveys by
Audubon Society
10 December 2016*; 5 January, 22 February, 18 April, 24 April 2017, 13 July 2018; 7 March, 28 August 2019; 5 February, 24 July, 27 August, 30 October 2020; and 17 August 2021
throughout quarterly surveys and supplemental surveys by Audubon Society
Grunion and Other
Wildlife
Protocols follow
www.grunion.org, and use the
Walker Scale
April and June 2017; March, April, and July 2018; June 2019; 26 May, 10, 14, 24, and 25 June 2021; and additional surveys by grunion volunteers
Weather Conditions
Wind speed (Kestrel), max wind
speed, air temperature,
precipitation data (NOAA)
14 and 28 December 2016*; 13 and 25 January, 4, 14, and 23 February, 24 March, 12 April, 21 June, 21 August, 13 September 2017; 11 January, 8 March, 13 April, 24 May, 15 August, 12 December 2018; 22 February, 25 April, 21 May, 1, 28 August, 4 October, 6 November 2019; 21 January, 5 February, 24 July, 21 August, and 30 October 2020; 19 February and 13 August 2021 Elevation Elevation profiles and crosssections; topographic map 13 December 2016*; 24 March, 21 June, 13 September 2017; 13 February, 24, 29 May, 15 August, 14 December 2018; 22
February, 21 May, 1 August, 6 November 2019; 5 February, and 24 July, 24 August, and 30 October 2020; 21 May, 13 and 17 August 2021
Sand Deposition and
Sediment Grain Size
MWAC method (Goossens et al
2000); sieve method; Empirical
sand transport calculations (Hsu
1981)
13 December 2016*; 24 March, 13 September 2017; 24 May, 16 November 2018; 21 May, 3 June, 6 November 2019; 24 July 2020; 13 August 2021
Photo Point Georeferenced photograph series
from fixed locations
13*, 17 December 2016; 13, 25 January, 4 February, 24 March, 25 April, 21 August, 13 September 2017; 11 January, 8 March, 13 April, 24 May, 15 August, 19 December 2018; 22 February, 25 April, 21 May, 1 August, 6 November 2019; 5 February, 24 July, 27 August, and 30 October 2020; 21 May and 13 August 2021 ** Indicates additional monitoring parameter added in Year 4.

For details on the individual protocols and sampling design, refer to the Santa Monica Beach Restoration Pilot Project Implementation and Monitoring Plan.

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1072 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
16 Wrack Cover
Wrack cover surveys were conducted to determine the percent cover, composition by species, and average depth of macrophyte wrack in the swash zone area directly in front of the restoration site and at a control site (Figure 8). A total of four line-intercept transects were surveyed, consisting of two transects in the swash zone directly in front of the restoration site and two transects in the swash zone of the control areas outside the project area. Wrack was identified to species when possible [e.g., giant kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera)]. These transects also recorded trash, tar, driftwood, other detritus or terrestrial debris in a similar manner. Wrack cover surveys for Years 1-4 were conducted on 28 December 2016; 14 February, 12 March, 21 June, and 20 September 2017; 11 January, 8 March, 24 May, 15 August, and 16 November 2018; 22 February, 21 May, and 1 August, 6 November 2019; 5 February, and 24 July 2020. Year 5 wrack monitoring surveys were conducted on 8 August and 30 October 2020 and 21 May and 13 August 2021.

During the pre-restoration baseline surveys conducted in December 2016, only giant kelp and surfgrass (Phyllospadix torreyi) were observed and the overall wrack cover was low, with an average wrack cover of 0.06% in both restoration and control transects (Figure 9, top). In post-restoration surveys wrack cover was highly variable across Years 1-5 (2017-2021). Wrack cover included seven species: giant kelp, surfgrass, Sargassum spp., Egregia menziesii, Ulva spp., Gelidium spp., and an unknown red turf algae.

Post-restoration surveys display a pattern of lower wrack cover during the winter surveys and higher wrack cover during the spring through fall surveys, possibly indicating seasonal fluctuations. Wrack cover was consistently low in December through March. This trend continued into Year 4, showing low cover in the winter survey (February 2020) and higher cover in the summer survey (July 2020; Figure 9, top). Timing of peak wrack cover was variable by year but occurred sometime between May and October. Cover between the restoration and control site were also highly variable and remained so through Year 5. Overall, there were not substantial differences in wrack cover observed between restoration and control sites over time (Figure 9, top). Wrack cover may be similar across restoration and control sites because there is no grooming along the restoration transect surveys and control transect surveys are conducted below most grooming activity along the high tide line.

In Years 1-5, overall wrack cover remained relatively low, yet variable, ranging between 0% and 15% (Figure 9). Cover was frequently dominated by giant kelp and surfgrass, but wrack composition was highly variable by survey. During spring (May 2021) and summer (August 2020 and 2021) of Year 5, there was relatively low wrack cover, ranging between 1.3% to 5%, dominated by surf grass (Figure 10, Figure 10). In October of Year 5, there was a substantial increase in the average wrack cover in both the control (33%) and restoration (23%) transects. This increase in wrack cover was driven by a high abundance of a red turf algae, with 32% average cover observed in the control and 20% in the restoration sites (Figure 11, Figure 12). A similar but smaller spike in abundance of the unknown red algae was observed in both restoration and control transects in September 2017 and in the restoration site in August 2018.

Terrestrial debris and trash were variable throughout the surveys (Figure 9, bottom). During the prerestoration baseline surveys conducted in December 2016, there was no trash observed and less than 1% cover of terrestrial debris (e.g., twigs, leaves, feather, other natural debris, etc.) in both restoration and control sites. Terrestrial debris in Years 1-5 was relatively low across all surveys, with a maximum

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1073 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
17 average cover of approximately 23% in the restoration site (January 2018) and range between 0% and 10% for all other surveys. In Year 5, terrestrial debris remained low, with less than 1% observed in all transects. Trash also remained low across all surveys in Year 5, at less than 1% average cover in both the control and restoration sites (Figure 9). This indicates either a lack of trash in the survey areas, or beneficial adaptive management measures such as hand-removal of trash that are shown to be effective at maintaining the restoration and control areas with very low overall trash cover.

Figure 8. Wrack survey transect at the restoration site (left) and control site (right).

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1074 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
18 Figure 9. Average percent cover of wrack by species (top) and trash and terrestrial debris (bottom) in the restoration area and control site across all surveys. Note variable y-axis for each graph.
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION
12/28/2016 2/14/2017 3/12/2017 6/21/2017 9/20/2017 1/11/2018 3/8/2018 5/24/2018 8/15/2018 11/16/2018 2/22/2019 5/21/2019 8/1/2019 11/6/2019 2/5/2020 7/24/2020 8/27/2020 10/30/2020 5/21/2021 8/13/2021 Average % Cover
Survey Date and Site
Wrack - Average Percent Cover
Unkown red algae
Gelidium spp.

Ulva
Sargasum spp.

Phyllospadix
Macrocystis
Egregia
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION

CONTROL

RESTORATION
12/28/2016 2/14/2017 3/12/2017 6/21/2017 9/20/2017 1/11/2018 3/8/2018 5/24/2018 8/15/2018 11/16/2018 2/22/2019 5/21/2019 8/1/2019 11/6/2019 2/5/2020 7/24/2020 8/27/2020 10/30/2020 5/21/2021 8/13/2021 Average % Cover
Survey Date and Site
Trash and Terrestrial Debris - Average Percent Cover
Trash Debris

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1075 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
19 Figure 10. Photograph of wrack transect at restoration site with primarily bare ground and sparse Phyllospadix sp. on 13 August 2021 (bottom).

Figure 11. Photograph of wrack line with red turf algae on 30 October 2020.

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1076 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
20 Figure 12. Photograph of mixed wrack clump comprised of Phyllospadix sp. and a red alga found on 30 October 2020 (left) and another algae photo found on the 21 May 2021 wrack survey (right).

Vegetation Cover and Seedling Density
Vegetation cover surveys can be used to provide a wide range of information and data, including summarizing the prevalence of native and non-native plant cover, determining species cover, relative species richness and diversity, and assessing canopy height. The primary objective of the transect- and quadrat-level cover surveys for this project was to assess the approximate cover of native coastal strand vegetation over time. The line-intercept transect and cover class quadrat survey methods are described, along with example field data sheets, in SOP 3.2 Vegetation Cover Surveys (TBF 2015b). Data were evaluated as percent cover by species. Additionally, individual seedlings were counted within randomly selected quadrats as part of the Cover Class Quadrat vegetation cover assessment method semiannually. Data are presented as germinated seedlings per square meter categorized by species and nativity, following assessment procedures described in SOP 3.4 Seed Bank Germination (TBF 2015c), and seedling data are also extrapolated up to the whole restoration area at approximately 6,900 m².

Four vegetation transects were surveyed within the restoration area and compared to two control transects surveyed outside the restoration area (approximately 100 m south of the restoration area).

Vegetation cover surveys were conducted on 13 December 2016; 24 March, 21 June, and 20 September 2017; 11 January, 24 May, 15 August, and 14 December 2018; 22 February, 21 May, 1 August, and 6 November 2019; 5 February, 24 July, 27 August, and 30 October 2020; 21 May, 13 and 17 August 2021.

In addition, two supplemental transects within the restoration area were surveyed on 17 August 2021.

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1077 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
21 These targeted transects were placed off-location of the fixed transects in case there was a trampling effect of vegetation cover on the existing permanent fixed location transects. The transects were parallel to existing transects, with one located approximately two meters south of the northern sand fence boundary, and the second approximately five meters south of the bisectional walking path.

All four of the seeded vegetation species germinated within and immediately adjacent to the restoration area [i.e., beach evening-primrose, red sand verbena, beach bur sage (Ambrosia chamissonis), and beach salt bush (Figure 13). Additionally, three other vegetation species germinated within the project area, two native and one non-native. The two natives were woolly heads and pink sand verbena, and the non-native species was European sea rocket (Cakile maritima) (Figure 14). Neither woolly heads, a native and possibly rare species variant, nor pink sand were in the seed mix as confirmed by the seed provider; thus, it is probable that there was either an existing seed bank for these species already along Santa Monica Beach, or that they were transported by wind, waves, birds, or humans. Combining all transects surveyed in Year 5, the highest proportions of cover were found to be beach evening-primrose and beach saltbush (Figure 15). In all years, sea rocket exhibited the lowest cover of any of the present species and was periodically removed by hand from within the restoration area as an adaptive management maintenance activity, requiring very little effort, and less over time as the seed bank depleted. As Figure 15 displays, the vegetation continues to be represented by multiple species exhibiting seasonal variations (rather than dominated by one or two species), with a more even cover distribution of native vegetation.

Vegetation cover assessed during the baseline (December 2016) surveys within both the restoration area and control site was zero and remained zero at the control site throughout all surveys (Figure 16).

Native vegetation cover was much higher than non-native cover (sea rocket) during all surveys, with zero relative and absolute non-native vegetation in Year 3 and 4 surveys. In Year 5, there was 7% relative and > 0.1% absolute non-native cover in the May 2021 cover, and zero relative and absolute non-native cover in all other Year 5 surveys. Native cover has increased over time, with seasonal variation. Absolute native cover fluctuated in Year 5, remaining between 3-5%. However, supplemental transects surveyed on 17 August 2021 showed native cover to be approximately 7%, the highest cover estimate of the project duration, slightly surpassing the November 2019 survey (Figure 16, top). Vegetation is likely to continue to increase and become more complex over time, though naturally occurring coastal strand habitats also usually have a significant portion of bare sand, even after becoming mature vegetation communities (Figure 17).

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1078 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
22 Figure 13. Photograph of various vegetation in restoration site. Top left: pink sand verbena; top right: red sand verbena; bottom left: beach evening-primrose; bottom right: beach salt bush.

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1079 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
23 Figure 14. Photograph of various vegetation in restoration site. Top left: woolly heads; top right: non-native sea rocket; bottom: beach bur sage.

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1080 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
24 Figure 15. Relative percent cover by species for all transects (live vegetation only, 13-Dec-16 was baseline survey with no vegetation identified). 24%
41%
36%
50% 47%
37%
27% 27%
44%
38% 35% 36%
44%
57%
62%
52% 54%
67%
41%
21%
21%
3%
7%
10%
28%
8%
7%
5% 2%
6%
6%
0%
9%
3%
10%
22%
14%
26% 35%
52%
29% 38%
33%
49%
36%
34%
24% 26%
14%
13%
6%
22%
14%
17%
21%
9%
14%
8%
16%
9%
24%
14% 7%
8%
18% 30%
1% 2%
2%
1% 1%
3%
3%
6%
1% 3%
1% 2% 1% 4% 3%
10%
2%
7%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
13-Dec-16 24-Mar-17 21-Jun-17 20-Sept-17 11-Jan-18 24-May-18 15-Aug-18 14-Dec-18 22-Feb-19 21-May-19 1-Aug-19 6-Nov-19 5-Feb-20 24-Jul-20 27-Aug-20 30-Oct-20 21-May-21 13-Aug-21 Relative Percent Cover (%)
Survey Date
Relative Percent Cover by Species for all Transects
Beach Evening Primrose Beach Bur Sage Beach Saltbush Red Sand Verbena Pink Sand Verbena Woolly Heads Sea Rocket Baseline (No Vegetation)

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1081 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
25 Figure 16. Average absolute native and non-native vegetation cover during all surveys within the restoration area (top) and at the control site (bottom). Asterisk (*) indicates two additional targeted transects surveyed on 17 August 2021. *
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 Average % Cover
Survey Date
Restoration Site Vegetation Cover
Native %
Non-native %
0 1
2 3
4 5
Average % Cover
Survey Date
Control Site Vegetation Cover
Native %
Non-native %

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1082 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
26 Figure 17. Photograph of various interspersed native vegetation scattered throughout the project site with areas of sandy bare ground (21 May 2021).

Both the baseline survey and each of the control surveys found zero seedlings on all transects. Table 2 displays the results of the seedling counts from within the restoration area on the 24 March 2017, 11 January 2018, 22 February 2019, 5 February 2020, 30 October 2020, and 21 May 2021 surveys and extrapolates the results up to the total project area (approximately 6,900 m²) by species. Note that the extrapolated data are based on averages and are thus not likely to represent an exact numerical count for the area but are considered estimates (rounded down to the closest thousand). Surveys conducted but not listed in Table 2 found no seedlings.

The March 2017 survey found more seedlings within the restoration area than the subsequent surveys, since it closely followed the initial vegetation seeding in December 2016 (Figure 18). The latter three surveys are better represented as flowering plants that produced germinated seedlings. The February 2020 survey recorded a low number of seedlings within the surveyed area, though many small juvenile individuals were present, which were too large to be categorized as seedlings. Similar results were seen in both October 2020 and May 2021 surveys. These surveys indicate ongoing natural re-seeding and germination by existing plants occurring throughout the site across the post-restoration survey years, as no additional seeds have been placed on site since December 2016.

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1083 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
27 Table 2. Seedling data results by species for 24 March 2017, 11 January 2018, and 22 February 2019 reported as counts, average number / m², and extrapolated counts for the entire restoration area (bold rows). Asterisk indicates non-native species.

Beach
bur sage
Beach
saltbush
Red sand
verbena
Pink
sand
verbena
Beach
evening
primrose
Woolly
heads
Sea
rocket
*
March 2017
Total Number of
Seedlings 337 35 9 0 71 0 9
Avg. Seedling
Count / m² 16.85 1.75 0.45 0 3.55 0 0.45
Total Estimated
for Restoration
Area
116,000 12,000 3,000 0 24,000 0 3,000
January 2018
Total Number of
Seedlings 36 16 2 0 56 0 0
Avg. Seedling
Count / m² 1.80 0.80 0.10 0 2.80 0 0
Total Estimated
for Restoration
Area
12,000 6,000 1,000 0 20,000 0 0
February 2019
Total Number of
Seedlings 207 10 5 0 36 0 0
Avg. Seedling
Count / m² 10.35 0.50 0.25 0 1.80 0 0
Total Estimated
for Restoration
Area
71,000 3,000 2,000 0 12,000 0 0
February 2020
Total Number of
Seedlings 50 0 0 0 1 0 0
Avg. Seedling
Count / m² 2.50 0 0 0 0.05 0 0
Total Estimated
for Restoration
Area
17,000 0 0 0 350 0 0

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1084 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
28 Beach
bur sage
Beach
saltbush
Red sand
verbena
Pink
sand
verbena
Beach
evening
primrose
Woolly
heads
Sea
rocket
*
October 2020
Total Number of
Seedlings 0 0 0 0 42 0 0
Avg. Seedling
Count / m² 0 0 0 0 2.10 0 0
Total Estimated
for Restoration
Area
0 0 0 0 15,000 0 0
May 2021
Total Number of
Seedlings 23 0 0 0 5 0 0
Avg. Seedling
Count / m² 1.15 0 0 0 0.25 0 0
Total Estimated
for Restoration
Area
8,000 0 0 0 1,700 0 0
Figure 18. Germinated seedlings within quadrat sampling, pencil used for scale (30 October 2020).

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1085 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
29 Vegetation Mapping
Vegetation mapping was a new monitoring parameter added once the vegetation was more established on site. This protocol uses a combination of aerial imagery, high-resolution Trimble GPS, and in-situ observations to delineate polygons depicting species composition. Vegetation mapping protocols are described in more detail in SOP 3.5 Vegetation Mapping (TBF 2015c).

Figure 19 displays the absolute native vegetation cover within the restoration area for the survey conducted on 17 August 2021 (Year 5). The highest absolute native cover (21-25%) was observed along the southern fence perimeter. Both the northern and southern plots display similar cover patterns with high native cover along the fencing perimeters, several large areas with cover in the 11-15% and 16-20% ranges, and the lowest cover (1-5%) in the central and oceanward regions. Only the access pathway displayed 0% cover due to the lack of seeding and the frequent trampling by beachgoers.

Figure 19. Absolute native vegetation cover within restoration site for August 2021 survey.

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1086 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
30 Figure 20. Representative photo of project area from oceanward looking northeast (13 August 2021).

Figures 21-22 display absolute cover for the four primary species on site: red sand verbena, beach bur sage, beach evening-primrose, and beach saltbush. All four species were present throughout the majority of the site. Red sand verbena exhibited 1-5% cover throughout most of the site, with several large areas with 6-10% and 11-15% cover (Figure 21 top). No red sand verbena was observed in the oceanward project area. The highest densities (6-10%) of beach bur sage were found along the northern and southern fence lines but was also present in lower amounts (1-5%) throughout most of the rest of the site (Figure 21 bottom). Beach salt bush (Figure 22 top) and beach evening-primrose was present in relatively low amounts (1-5%) most of the site, with slightly higher cover (6-10%) of beach eveningprimrose in the back beach portion of the site (Figure 22 bottom). Low cover of the four primary species throughout the site is consistent with natural coastal strand habitats, which exhibit patchy vegetation with large areas of bare sand.

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1087 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
31 Figure 21. Absolute % Cover of red sand verbena (Abronia maritima) (top) and beach bur sage (Ambrosia chamissonis) (bottom), August 2021 survey.

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1088 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
32 Figure 22. Absolute % Cover of beach salt bush (Atriplex leucophylla) and beach evening-primrose (Camissoniopsis cheiranthifolia), August 2021 survey.

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1089 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
33 Invertebrates
Invertebrate data were collected using techniques described in detail in Dugan et al. 2015 and led by scientists from Coastal Restoration Consultants, Inc., and the University of California, Santa Barbara.

Common examples of macroinvertebrate indicator taxa in southern California include talitrid amphipods (Megalorchestia spp.), and the common sand crab (Emerita analoga). Invertebrates were surveyed on 28 December 2016, 18 July 2017, 8 March 2018, 15 August 2018, and 7 March 2019 and led by expert beach scientists, David Hubbard and Dr. Jenifer Dugan. Data from the March 2018 and subsequent surveys were not able to be retrieved at the time of publication of this report due to logistical issues and laboratory closures related to COVID-19, but are anticipated to be available in 2022. Year 4 and 5 surveys were also cancelled due to COVID-19, but planned for 2022. Six within-restoration transects were surveyed and compared to data from six control transects located several hundred meters south of the restoration area (Figure 23). Additional sieving of sand adjacent to vegetation patches to assess dune beetle presence occurred on the 8 March 2018 survey. For additional method details, refer to the Santa Monica Beach Restoration Pilot Project Implementation and Monitoring Plan (October 2016).

Figure 23. Photograph of researchers conducting invertebrate core surveys (7 March 2019).

Upper intertidal beach fauna: There is little evidence that upper intertidal beach fauna has responded to the change in management at the pilot project site as of the 2017 samples. There has been little or no contrast between samples at the control site and the demonstration project. The December 2016 baseline surveys indicated low background levels of upper beach invertebrates (e.g., beach hoppers, Megalorchestia minor and M. benedictii) at between 300-400 individuals per meter of shoreline, with similar numbers at the restoration site and the control site. These data are indicative of the frequent beach grooming regime prior to restoration. Analyses of the December 2016 and July 2017 data indicate similar results for both surveys. Further surveys will help assess whether there is divergence between the control site and restoration site over time.

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1090 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
34 Fauna associated with dune vegetation: There has been no significant difference in aerial insects captured on yellow sticky cards to date between control and pilot project sites, during the first two years of project implementation. Subsequent survey data have not been processed due to COVID-19.

Other observations suggest that invertebrates associated with plants are responding to the restoration.

Dune beetles rapidly colonized the pilot project. Dune beetles were not present during the baseline monitoring (December 2016) surveys or in any control areas but were present during the July 2017 surveys and all subsequent surveys; these data indicate that dune beetles colonized post-restoration, an event likely attributable to the presence of new vegetation (Figure 18).

Figure 24. Dune beetle identified on vegetation within the restoration area (5 February 2020).

Avifauna
The presence and distribution of avifauna within an ecosystem is often used as an index of habitat quality due to their diet and vulnerability to environmental conditions (Conway 2008). Avifauna data are useful to characterize representative avian assemblages and spatial distributions within a particular area. Bird survey methods are described in detail, along with field data sheets, in SOP 5.1 Bird Abundance-Activity (TBF 2015d). The primary purpose of avifauna surveys for this project was to provide a general understanding of the bird community and corresponding behavior in the restoration area before and after restoration. Bird surveys were conducted by an ornithologist on 10 December 2016 (baseline, pre-restoration survey); 5 January, 22 February, 18 April, and 24 April 2017; and 13 July 2018.

Subsequent surveys were conducted by TBF staff on 7 March and 28 August 2019; 5 February, 24 July 2020, 27 August, 30 October 2020; and 17 August 2021. All bird data results are combined and reported below, comparing birds found within the restoration area and immediately adjacent to those found several hundred meters away or flying over the area.

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1091 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
35 In Years 1-5, frequently identified species on surveys included gulls and several shorebirds (e.g., willet, Tringa semipalmata) (Table 3). Shorebirds were observed both roosting and foraging within the restoration area, most notably, the federally threatened western snowy plover (Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus), which produced the first egg-bearing nest in the Los Angeles region in almost 70 years within the restoration area (discussed further below) in 2017. Plovers were identified foraging in front and throughout the enclosure on multiple occasions. In May 2018, a killdeer (Charadrius vociferous) nested within the restoration site. Several species of gull were also frequently identified in and around the restoration area, flying overhead, and in the adjacent ‘control’ sites. Urban species such as the rock pigeon (Columba livia) were identified primarily in adjacent areas, but not within the restoration site. On the July 2018 survey, an adult and juvenile peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus) were observed circling low over the sand inland of the restoration site. In Year 4, an osprey (Pandion haliaetus) and cormorant (Phalacrocorax sp.) were also observed within or adjacent to the restoration area.

During Year 5, many of the same avifauna species were identified as in previous years, including the California brown pelican (Pelacanus occidentalis californicus) and gulls. Birds were within the restoration area, adjacent control areas, and nearshore waters both flying over and foraging. Western snowy plovers (Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus) were not observed within site during the Year 5 targeted avian surveys but were observed near and within the site during other on-site activities (Figure 25) and were also identified by project partners roosting on site.

Figure 26. Photograph of snowy plovers foraging directly outside of the project area (top) and whimbrels foraging throughout the site (bottom) on 5 February 2020.

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1092 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
36 Figure 27. Photo within the restoration area from 30 March 2021.

Table 3. Avifauna species identified as present in the restoration area and in the surrounding area adjacent to the restoration. Data for all surveys were combined.

Category Common Name Scientific Name Restoration Adjacent Shorebird
Western Snowy Plover * Charadrius alexandrinus
nivosus
X X
Whimbrel Numenius phaeopus X X
Willet Tringa semipalmata X X
Sanderling Calidris alba X X
Marbled Godwit Limosa fedoa X
Long-billed Curlew Numenius americanus X X
Tern Thalasseus spp X
Open Water
Surf Scoter Melanitta perspicillata X
CA Brown Pelican ** Pelecanus occidentalis
californicus X X
Cormorant Phalacrocarax spp. X X
Gull
California Gull Larus californicus X X
Ring-billed Gull Larus delawarensis X X
Western Gull Larus occidentalis X X
Heermann’s Gull Larus heermanni X
Urban
Canada Goose Branta canadensis X
American Crow Corvus brachyrhynchos X X
Rock Pigeon (Feral Pigeon) Columba livia X
Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus X
Killdeer Charadrius vociferous X X
Raptor Osprey Pandion haliaetus X
* = rare species listed as threatened by USFWS
** = previously listed species, but delisted in 2008

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1093 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
37 Western Snowy Plover
The first four western snowy plovers identified within the restoration area were found roosting during a TBF bird survey on 23 February 2017, two months after the installation of the project. Plovers are known to overwinter in the vicinity (within an enclosure approximately 500 m south of the restoration area) but had not previously been identified using the specific restoration area of the beach. Throughout all surveys, care was taken to avoid disturbance to the birds. The restoration area falls within approximately the middle of the Santa Monica Beach critical habitat area for plovers (Subunit 45A, Figure 29), southwest of San Vicente Boulevard. As migrant plovers may start trying to identify breeding locations as early as March, plovers are carefully monitored throughout the year moving in and out of the restoration area.

Dan Cooper, an ornithologist, detected a nesting plover within the restoration area on 18 April 2017 and confirmed the presence of one egg in a nest scrape containing bits of shells and adjacent debris. This confirmed nest was the first one in the Los Angeles region in almost 70 years. Local, state, and federal agencies were all immediately notified along with the Santa Monica Audubon Society, an important local stakeholder group who have conducted bird surveys in Los Angeles for many decades and who maintain the plover enclosure on the southern portion of Santa Monica Beach. On 24 April 2017, US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), who have jurisdiction over federally threatened species, several ornithologists, and TBF installed a mini-enclosure over the nest and confirmed the presence of three eggs. After the mini-enclosure was installed, the male plover immediately returned to the nest (Figure 28).

Unfortunately, over subsequent weeks, extremely high winds buried the nest, which was subsequently abandoned. While plovers were identified within the restoration area in the breeding season in 2018- 2020, no subsequent nesting attempts were made (Error! Reference source not found.). Signs were posted around the perimeter of the site notifying the public of possible nesting. Crows and dogs have occasionally been observed and could potentially deter plovers and other shorebirds from using and nesting in the site.

Figure 28. Photograph of nesting western snowy plover (credit: Tom Ryan 24 April 2017).

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1094 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
38 Figure 29. Map of WSP critical habitat (Subunit CA 45A) and restoration area boundary (Data source: USFWS ECOS 2018).

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1095 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
39 Grunion and Other Wildlife
California grunion are a species of marine fish found only along the coast of southern California and northern Baja California. They exhibit unique spawning behavior, laying and fertilizing eggs completely out of the water, on high spring tides along sandy beaches (Martin 2006). Grunion spawn between March and August, with peak events between April and June. Grunion and other wildlife such as nearshore dolphins or fish can be indicators of the higher trophic levels of the sandy shore food web.

Grunion surveys were conducted in April and June 2017; March, April, and July 2018; and June 2019. No new surveys were conducted in Year 4 due to COVID-19, though surveys resumed in Year 5. Year 5 surveys were conducted in May and June 2021. Surveys were conducted at night, during peak high tide events and following a full or new moon. Grunion surveys followed standardized regional protocols with some data provided by citizen scientists conducting surveys using the same protocols. Data summaries for surveys not conducted by TBF and LMU’s CRI were provided by Dr. Karen Martin, Pepperdine University, through the community science Grunion Greeter program. In Year 5, grunion surveys were conducted as a part of a CRI student research project investigating the relationship between sand surface temperature and temperature at grunion egg depth. The Grunion Greeter Observation Form was completed during each survey and subsequently entered onto the regional web database at www.grunion.org. The Walker Scale was used as a monitoring metric, which ranges from W-0 to W-5 as shown in Table 4.

In Years 1-3 and Year 5, all reported surveys in the vicinity of the restoration area recorded Walker Scale results of W-0 (Table 5). While no grunion were observed during survey dates, there was evidence that they spawned in the area at least once in June 2018, as eggs were identified within the restoration area (K. Martin, Pepperdine University, pers. obs.). These results are consistent with pre-restoration baseline data from the survey location.

Table 4. Walker scale for monitoring California grunion runs.

Walker Scale Description
W-0 No fish, or 1 or 2 scouts, no spawning
W-1
10-100 fish spawning at different times in one or
several locations
W-2
100-500 fish spawning at different times, in one or
several locations
W-3
Hundreds of fish spawning in several locations or over
a broad area of the beach
W-4
Thousands of fish together, little sand visible between them over relatively small area for less than one hour
W-5
Fish covering beach, not possible to walk through the
run without stepping on fish, run lasts for an hour or
more over large area

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1096 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
40 Table 5. Results from grunion surveys conducted at the Santa Monica Restoration Site in Year 5.

Survey Date Walker Scale
26 May 2021 W-0
10 June 2021 W-0
14 June 2021 W-0
24 June 2021 W-0
25 June 2021 W-0
Other wildlife present in the area included dolphins frequently seen offshore foraging in the surf zone (e.g., Figure 30), jumping fish, high densities of bean clams in the intertidal zone (Donax gouldi), and sea lions also seen in the surf zone offshore.

Figure 30. Dolphin photographed swimming offshore in front of restoration area (5 February 2020).

Physical Characteristics
Physical characteristics help to characterize the beach in comparison to other locations (e.g., elevation profiles; Dugan et al. 2015). Additionally, site checks were performed at least quarterly to assess the condition of the fence, collect trash, etc. Specific data for physical characteristics collected and summarized in this report include precipitation, wind, temperature, climate data, elevation profiles, sand deposition, and sand grain size. Supplemental weather data were downloaded from AccuWeather Premium and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Climate Data Online. Weather patterns and climate data collected from external sources are meant to be representative, not indicative of specifics within the restoration area at any given moment in time.

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1097 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
41 Overall, the restoration site exhibited physical differences as compared to control locations and itself over time, primarily through the accretion of sand along the fence line, plant hummocks, and wrack line.

Elevation profiles and high-resolution topographical mapping of both the restoration area and control locations provide information on the change in physical topography over time.

Precipitation
The total rainfall for the wet weather months (October through May of the following year) was 16.32 inches during Year 1, 3.79 inches in Year 2, 16.94 inches in Year 3, 13.14 inches in Year 4, and 5.00 inches in Year 5, as measured by the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) rain gauge (Figure 31). Year 5 had similar rainfall to Year 2 and less rainfall than Years 1, 3, and 4. In Year 5, three out of the eight wet weather months experienced no rainfall. Approximately 97.6% of the total wet season rainfall occurred across three months (December 2020, January 2021, and March 2021), with rainfall ranging between

1.32 to 1.91 inches per month (Figure 31).

0.36 1.11

2.78 7.44

4.04 0.08 0.38 0.13

0.0 2.0

4.0 6.0

8.0 Oct-16 Nov-16 Dec-16 Jan-17 Feb-17 Mar-17 Apr-17 May-17 Precipitation (in)
Precipitation Total by Month -
Year 1 (October 2016 - May 2017)

0.00 0.10 0.01

1.40 0.10

2.07 0.05 0.06

0.0 2.0

4.0 6.0

8.0 Oct-17 Nov-17 Dec-17 Jan-18 Feb-18 Mar-18 Apr-18 May-18 Precipitation (in)
Precipitation Total by Month -
Year 2 (October 2017 - May 2018)

0.58 2.09

1.45 5.52

4.42 2.10

0.05 0.73

0.0 2.0

4.0 6.0

8.0 Oct-18 Nov-18 Dec-18 Jan-19 Feb-19 Mar-19 Apr-19 May-19 Precipitation (in)
Precipitation Total by Month -
Year 3 (October 2018 - May 2019)
*

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1098 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
42 Figure 31. Monthly precipitation totals (inches) for the wet weather months (October-May). Daily precipitation data were downloaded from NOAA Climate Date Online (CDO) and originally recorded at the LAX rain gauge.

Asterisk indicates project installation month in December 2016.

Wind and Temperature
Average sand temperature, wind speed, and maximum wind speed (over three minutes) were recorded in both the north and the south plots using a small, hand-held weather meter (Kestrel®) and a Fluke Mini IR Thermometer®. Data were collected on 14 and 28 December 2016; 13 and 25 January, 4, 14, and 23 February, 24 March, 12 April, 21 June, 21 August, and 13 September 2017; 11 January, 8 March, 13 April, 24 May, 15 August, and 12 December 2018; 22 February, 25 April, 21 May, 1 and 28 August, 4 October, and 6 November 2019; 21 January, 5 February, 24 July, and 21 and 27 August 2020; 19 February and 13 August 2021. Note values that are missing from Year 4 were due to technical equipment issues. NOAA climate data follow below.

Air temperature, sand temperature, and wind speeds were all highly variable depending on the specific conditions of survey days. Sunnier days / warmer summer months had higher sand temperatures over 40 °C (August and April, Table 6). The average wind speed recorded at 1.5 m in height ranged from approximately 0.5 to 5.7 m/s with gusts of up to 7.1 m/s. The average wind speed recorded along the ground was lower, ranging lower between 0.5 to 4.2 m/s with gusts of up to 5.0 m/s recorded during surveys (Table 6).
0 1.43

4.42 0.38 0

4.11 2.68

0.12 0.0

2.0 4.0

6.0 8.0
Oct-19 Nov-19 Dec-19 Jan-20 Feb-20 Mar-20 Apr-20 May-20 Precipitation (in)
Precipitation Total by Month -
Year 4 (October 2019 - May 2020)
0 0.1

1.65 1.91

0.02 1.32
0 0

0.0 2.0

4.0 6.0

8.0 Oct-19 Nov-19 Dec-19 Jan-20 Feb-20 Mar-20 Apr-20 May-20 Precipitation (in)
Precipitation Total by Month -
Year 5 (October 2020 - May 2021)

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1099 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
43 Table 6. Summary data for temperature and wind speed collected on site during surveys. Asterisk indicates NOAA data instead of in situ data due to equipment malfunction (January and February 2020).

Date Temperatures (°C) Wind Speed (m/s)
Year Month Air Sand Maximum
(1.5 meters)
Average
(1.5 meters)
Maximum
(ground)
Average
(ground)
2016 December 18.7 18.8 2.1 1.7 1.6 1.0
2017
January 14.2 19.9 2.9 2.4 2.3 1.7
February 14.5 26.7 7.1 5.7 5.0 4.2
March 17.2 22.4 2.5 2.1 2.1 1.6
April ---- ---- 3.0 2.7 2.4 2.0
June 18.8 36.5 2.5 2.1 2.1 1.8
August 24.4 29.3 4.0 3.2 2.6 2.0
September 23.9 40.8 6.1 3.9 4.3 3.0
2018
January 21.5 25.7 3.9 3.2 2.5 1.9
March 15.1 24.0 1.9 1.4 1.3 1.0
April 21.0 46.6 2.1 1.7 2.8 2.2
May 17.1 30.1 2.4 1.9 2.3 1.8
August ---- 46.3 5.3 4.1 3.9 3.0
December 16.2 11.2 1.4 0.8 0.6 0.5
2019
February 18.5 29.1 5.3 3.6 2.7 2.5
April 20.7 45.1 4.0 3.5 2.4 2.3
May 21.0 34.0 6.5 5.8 4.2 4.2
August 21.8 44.2 3.6 2.9 2.1 1.5
October --- 28.7 --- --- --- ---
November 21.2 29.4 1.9 5.7 --- ---
2020
January 12.8 ---- ---- 4.5 * ---- ----
February 12.8 ---- ---- 1.0 * ---- ----
July 21.6 27.6 1.7 0.5 1.7 0.5
August 24.0 40.7 5.2 4.0 3.65 2.8
2021
February 25.0 ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
August 23.7 ---- 2.1 1.7 2.0 1.6
NOAA Climate Data
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Climate Data Online were downloaded for the Santa Monica Municipal Airport Station on 31 August 2021. The data results are summarized in Table 7 and Table 8. Precipitation totals during the 2020-2021 winter were greater than that of Year 4, but less than Years 1-3 (Table 8). Wind gust observations remain high (25-40 mph) throughout 2020- 2021, except during August and September of 2020 and June and July of 2021. Humidity data for Years 3-5 were unavailable from the NOAA climate portal at the time of this report.

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1100 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
44 Table 7. Table displaying NOAA temperature and humidity monthly data for the Santa Monica Municipal Airport Station (downloaded on 31 August 2021).

Year Month
Temperature (°C) Humidity
Average Maximum Minimum Average
2016
October 18.9 34.4 12.8 74.4
November 17.0 34.4 7.8 60.8
December 14.0 27.2 5.6 67.5
2017
January 12.7 23.9 4.4 79.0
February 13.5 21.1 5 88.6
March 15.0 25.6 7.2 73.0
April 16.7 28.3 10 67.9
May 16.2 29.4 8.9 77.1
June 18.1 27.8 13.9 83.5
July 20.9 31.1 16.1 81.5
August 21.0 31.7 17.2 81.7
September 20.9 36.1 13.3 76.8
October 20.2 38.3 13.9 66.4
November 17.0 33.3 9.4 72.3
December 14.7 27.8 6.1 51.9
2018
January 15.2 30.6 6.7 67.7
February 13.4 26.1 5.0 62.1
March 13.6 26.7 5.6 77.9
April 15.0 28.3 9.4 72.0
May 15.7 24.4 11.1 77.4
June 17.8 23.9 13.3 77.3
July 21.8 36.7 16.1 76.6
August 23.8 27.8 20.3 N/A
September 22.1 25.3 18.9 N/A
October 21.1 25.3 17.0 N/A
November 19.2 24.5 13.9 N/A
December 16.2 20.9 11.6 N/A
2019
January 15.6 20.1 11.0 N/A
February 12.3 16.1 8.5 N/A
March 15.1 19.2 11.0 N/A
April 16.7 20.3 13.1 N/A
May 16.2 19.0 13.1 N/A
June 18.7 21.3 16.1 N/A
July 20.7 23.8 17.5 N/A
August 20.9 24.3 17.7 N/A
September 21.7 25.6 17.8 N/A
October 19.7 25.6 13.8 N/A
November 15.8 20.8 10.9 N/A

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1101 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
45 Year Month
Temperature (°C) Humidity
Average Maximum Minimum Average
December 13.6 17.9 9.2 N/A
2020
January 13.9 18.7 9.1 N/A
February 14.4 19.2 9.6 N/A
March 13.7 17.4 9.9 N/A
April 15.9 19.6 12.3 N/A
May 18.0 21.8 14.2 N/A
June 19.3 22.4 16.2 N/A
July 19.4 22.9 15.9 N/A
August 21.6 25.4 17.9 N/A
September 21.4 25.9 16.9 N/A
October 20.5 25.2 15.8 N/A
November ---- ---- ---- N/A
December 14.5 20.5 8.6 N/A
2021
January 14.2 19.7 8.8 N/A
February 14.4 19.3 9.4 N/A
March 13.5 18.4 8.7 N/A
April 15.9 20.1 11.6 N/A
May 16.8 19.7 13.9 N/A
June 18.8 21.7 15.9 N/A
July 20.7 23.6 17.9 N/A
Table 8. Table displaying NOAA wind speed and precipitation monthly data for the Santa Monica Municipal Airport Station (downloaded on 31 August 2021).

Year Month
Wind Speed (mph)
Precipitation
(cm)
Average Maximum Minimum Maximum
Gust
Total
2016
October 4.0 16.0 0.0 24.0 0.76
November 4.2 17.0 0.0 33.0 1.80
December 4.4 21.0 0.0 31.0 8.21
2017
January 4.9 22.0 0.0 32.0 15.71
February 4.1 26.0 0.0 40.0 7.38
March 4.6 20.0 0.0 36.0 0.38
April 5.6 23.0 0.0 37.0 0.22
May 5.2 17.0 0.0 31.0 0.11
June 4.7 15.0 0.0 23.0 0.0
July 4.9 14.0 0.0 21.0 0.0
August 4.7 14.0 0.0 20.0 0.0
September 4.5 15.0 0.0 23.0 0.0
October 3.8 13.0 0.0 22.0 0.0

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1102 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
46 Year Month
Wind Speed (mph)
Precipitation
(cm)
Average Maximum Minimum Maximum
Gust
Total
November 3.4 13.0 0.0 20.0 0.14
December 4.0 18.0 0.0 36.0 0.0
2018
January 3.9 20.0 0.0 31.0 3.04
February 4.4 22.0 0.0 31.0 0.26
March 4.6 16.0 0.0 29.0 8.1
April 5.0 21.0 0.0 37.0 0.06
May 4.8 16.0 0.0 25.0 0.18
June 5.0 17.0 0.0 21.0 0.0
July 5.1 14.0 0.0 22.0 0.0
August 4.9 18.1 0.0 28.0 0.0
September 4.5 16.1 0.0 21.9 0.0
October 4.2 25.1 0.0 35.1 0.51
November 3.7 21.9 0.0 31.1 1.57
December 4.1 21 0.0 33.1 1.68
2019
January 4.4 19.9 0.0 36.9 5.14
February 5.7 23.9 0.0 38.9 4.52
March 5.2 21 0.0 31.1 2.02
April 5.3 25.9 0.0 40.9 0.043
May 5.3 23 0.0 34.0 1.14
June 5.2 19.9 0.0 28.0 0.0
July 5.0 14.1 0.0 19.9 0.0
August 4.5 15.0 0.0 21.0 0.0
September 4.5 16.1 0.0 24.0 0.0
October 4.3 18.1 0.0 23.0 0.0
November 3.8 18.1 0.0 31.0 0.6
December 4.3 19.9 0.0 31.0 1.8
2020
January 3.8 18.1 0.0 33.0 0.2
February 4.7 25.9 0.0 47.0 0.0
March 4.7 23.0 0.0 33.0 1.8
April 4.9 18.1 0.0 25.0 0.9
May 4.9 19.9 0.0 30.0 0.1
June 5.6 21.9 0.0 32.0 0.0
July 4.7 17.0 0.0 25.0 0.0
August 4.7 15.0 0.0 20.0 0.0
September 3.8 16.1 0.0 20.0 0.0
October 3.6 18.1 0.0 32.0 0.0
November ---- ---- 0.0 ---- 0.15

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1103 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
47 Year Month
Wind Speed (mph)
Precipitation
(cm)
Average Maximum Minimum Maximum
Gust
Total
December 4 23.9 0.0 36.0 3.28
2021
January 4 23.0 0.0 36.0 4.47
February 4.7 21.9 0.0 36.0 0.0
March 4.9 21.0 0.0 34.0 2.89
April 5.1 19.9 0.0 29.0 0.0
May 5.1 19.9 0.0 32.0 0.0
June 5.4 17.0 0.0 25.0 0.0
July 5.1 17.0 0.0 23.0 0.25

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1104 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
48 Elevation Profiles
Elevation profile data were collected via four transects within the restoration area and two control transects outside the restoration area (approximately 100 m south of the restoration area) (Figure 32).

Elevation profiles provide a method to measure topographical changes within the seeded fenced area and beach face over time. Elevation profile data were collected on 13 December 2016 (baseline); 24 March, 21 June, and 13 September 2017; 13 February, 24 May, 29 May, 15 August, and 14 December 2018; 22 February, 21 May, 1 August, and 6 November 2019; 5 February, 24 July, and 30 October 2020; 21 May and 13 August 2021. Elevation profiles taken over the five years post-project implementation show notable changes from both the baseline and control transects (Figure 33– Figure 44). Figure 33 – Figure 44 are separated into ‘winter beach’ and ‘summer beach’ defined by the highly variable seasonal profile on beaches in Southern California. Data from Control Transect 2 on 24 July 2020 and Transect 3 on 24 August 2020 were removed during quality control checks due to equipment malfunction. Berm topology along the fenced perimeter of the site shows variations over time between the restoration site and control site, with up to a meter of sand deposition present in multiple locations.

All elevation profiles within the restoration area show an overall increase in elevation from the baseline surveys, indicating the deposition and retention of sand within the site. Sand build-up is greatest along the berm, nearest the beach face and ocean, and along the northern and southern fence perimeter. The southeast corner of the restoration area continues to show a high relative buildup of sediment (e.g., Restoration Transect 4, Figure 39 and Figure 40), which can be explained by the predominant wind pattern moving sand in that direction. Survey data show that control sites have shown slight variability over time, with seasonal changes in the berm and beach face, elevation variability, and a generally flat and even beach profile, all likely due to maintenance by grooming. In general, all restoration transects have shown a higher overall increase in elevation compared to control transects. Additionally, restoration transects are also now capturing the formation of plant hummocks across multiple seasons (e.g., at approximately the 40-meter mark along Transects 2, 3, and 4). Future surveys will allow for a continued assessment of sediment movement to support the evaluation of the restoration area as a possible buffer from climate change impacts such as sea level rise and wave erosion, though seasonal changes may also be captured.

Figure 32. TBF staff and CRI interns conducting an elevation profile survey on 21 May 2021.

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1105 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
49 Figure 33. Restoration Transect 1 elevation profiles during Winter Beach surveys (Elevation in NAVD88).

Figure 34. Restoration Transect 1 elevation profiles during Summer Beach surveys (Elevation in NAVD88).

0.0 0.5

1.0 1.5

2.0 2.5

3.0 3.5

4.0 4.5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Elevation (m)
Transect Distance (m)
Restoration Transect 1 (Winter Surveys) 13-Dec-16
24-Mar-17
13-Feb-18
14-Dec-18
22-Feb-19
6-Nov-19
5-Feb-20
30-Oct-20
21-May-21

0.0 0.5

1.0 1.5

2.0 2.5

3.0 3.5

4.0 4.5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Elevation (m)
Transect Distance (m)
Restoration Transect 1 (Summer Surveys) 13-Dec-16
21-Jun-17
13-Sep-17
24-May-18
15-Aug-18
21-May-19
1-Aug-19
24-Jul-20
24-Aug-20
13-Aug-21

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1106 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
50 Figure 35. Restoration Transect 2 elevation profiles during Winter Beach surveys (Elevation in NAVD88).

Figure 36. Restoration Transect 2 elevation profiles during Summer Beach surveys (Elevation in NAVD88).

0.0 0.5

1.0 1.5

2.0 2.5

3.0 3.5

4.0 4.5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Elevation (m)
Transect Distance (m)
Restoration Transect 2 (Winter Surveys) 13-Dec-16
24-Mar-17
13-Feb-18
14-Dec-18
22-Feb-19
6-Nov-19
5-Feb-20
30-Oct-20
21-May-21

0.0 0.5

1.0 1.5

2.0 2.5

3.0 3.5

4.0 4.5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Elevation (m)
Transect Distance (m)
Restoration Transect 2 (Summer Surveys) 13-Dec-16
13-Sep-17
24-May-18
15-Aug-18
21-May-19
1-Aug-19
24-Jul-20
24-Aug-20
13-Aug-21

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1107 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
51 Figure 37. Restoration Transect 3 elevation profiles during Winter Beach surveys (Elevation in NAVD88).

Figure 38. Restoration Transect 3 elevation profiles during Summer Beach surveys (Elevation in NAVD88).

0.0 0.5

1.0 1.5

2.0 2.5

3.0 3.5

4.0 4.5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Elevation (m)
Transect Distance (m)
Restoration Transect 3 (Winter Surveys) 13-Dec-16
24-Mar-17
13-Feb-18
14-Dec-18
22-Feb-19
6-Nov-19
5-Feb-20
30-Oct-20
21-May-21

0.0 0.5

1.0 1.5

2.0 2.5

3.0 3.5

4.0 4.5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Elevation (m)
Transect Distance (m)
Restoration Transect 3 (Summer Surveys) 13-Dec-16
13-Sep-17
24-May-18
15-Aug-18
21-May-19
1-Aug-19
24-Jul-20
13-Aug-21

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1108 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
52 Figure 39. Restoration Transect 4 elevation profiles during Winter Beach surveys (Elevation in NAVD88).

Figure 40. Restoration Transect 4 elevation profiles during Summer Beach surveys (Elevation in NAVD88).

0.0 0.5

1.0 1.5

2.0 2.5

3.0 3.5

4.0 4.5

5.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Elevation (m)
Transect Distance (m)
Restoration Transect 4 (Winter Surveys) 13-Dec-16
24-Mar-17
13-Feb-18
14-Dec-18
6-Nov-19
5-Feb-20
30-Oct-20
21-May-21

0.0 0.5

1.0 1.5

2.0 2.5

3.0 3.5

4.0 4.5

5.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Elevation (m)
Transect Distance (m)
Restoration Transect 4 (Summer Surveys) 13-Dec-16
13-Sep-17
29-May-18
15-Aug-18
21-May-19
1-Aug-19
24-Jul-20
24-Aug-20
13-Aug-21

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1109 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
53 Figure 41. Control Transect 1 (non-restored area) elevation profiles during Winter Beach surveys (Elevation in NAVD88).

Figure 42. Control Transect 1 (non-restored area) elevation profiles during Summer Beach surveys (Elevation in NAVD88).

0.0 0.5

1.0 1.5

2.0 2.5

3.0 3.5

4.0 4.5

5.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Elevation (m)
Transect Distance (m)
Control Transect 1 (Winter Surveys) 13-Dec-16
24-Mar-17
13-Feb-18
14-Dec-18
22-Feb-19
6-Nov-19
5-Feb-20
30-Oct-20
21-May-21

0.0 0.5

1.0 1.5

2.0 2.5

3.0 3.5

4.0 4.5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Elevation (m)
Transect Distance (m)
Control Transect 1 (Summer Surveys) 13-Dec-16
13-Sep-17
24-May-18
15-Aug-18
21-May-19
1-Aug-19
24-Jul-20
24-Aug-20
13-Aug-21

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1110 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
54 Figure 43. Control transect 2 (non-restored area) elevation profiles during Winter Beach surveys (Elevation in NAVD88).

Figure 44. Control transect 2 (non-restored area) elevation profiles during Summer Beach surveys (Elevation in NAVD88).

0.0 0.5

1.0 1.5

2.0 2.5

3.0 3.5

4.0 4.5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Elevation (m)
Transect Distance (m)
Control Transect 2 (Winter Surveys) 13-Dec-16
24-Mar-17
13-Feb-18
14-Dec-18
22-Feb-19
6-Nov-19
5-Feb-20
30-Oct-20
21-May-21

0.0 0.5

1.0 1.5

2.0 2.5

3.0 3.5

4.0 4.5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Elevation (m)
Transect Distance (m)
Control Transect 2 (Summer Surveys) 13-Dec-16
13-Sep-17
24-May-18
15-Aug-18
21-May-19
1-Aug-19
24-Jul-20
24-Aug-20
13-Aug-21

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1111 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
55 High-resolution elevation surveys using a Trimble Geo7x GPS were conducted on 12 April 2017 (Year 1), from 24 to 27 June 2018 (Year 2), on 21 August 2020 (Year 4), and 4 June 2021 (Year 5). Elevation points were downloaded, quality control checked, and analyzed in a geographic information system (GIS) to create a topographic surface of the restoration site. Figure 48 displays the topographic map results from the GPS elevation survey in May 2017 (top) and May/June 2018 (bottom) and Figure 49 displays results for Year 5. The Year 5 survey was conducted with higher resolution than previous surveys and all Year 5 data points had a precision of +/- 0.1m (post correction). The Year 5 survey boundary was also extended 2-3 m to capture the dune growth along the exterior of the perimeter fence. Year 4 results were not included due to a lower relative precision of points collected during that survey and a higher equipment error. The topographic data supplement the elevation profile transects and indicate a buildup of sand along the berm and fence perimeter, with smaller plant hummocks throughout the site. The Year 5 survey shows a noticeable increase in elevation throughout most of the restoration area. This is most apparent in the southern portion of the project footprint. Additionally, the micro-topography of the restoration site becomes increasingly more complex across each subsequent survey, which supports visual observations of the formation of dune hummocks around vegetation and wrack within the restoration site (Figure 45 and Figure 46).

Figure 50 and Figure 51 show buildup of sand along the northern fence perimeter in May 2017 and again in February 2020, where an increase of vegetation, especially red sand verbena and beach bur sage are present. Berm changes parallel to the ocean have also been observed in photographic documentation and monitoring data with seasonal variations present. The beach berm ridge is higher in elevation and more prominent in the restoration site. Figure 52 shows a time-series of the berm changes observed post-restoration. The continued rise in elevation of the berm in multiple elevation profiles and supporting topographical surveys indicate promising results that the site is potentially becoming more resilient to coastal flooding than other sections of the beach that retain a low, flat profile. Future surveys will continue to inform changes in the restoration site and berm morphology over time.

Figure 45. Photograph of vegetated dune hummock within the restoration area (13 August 2021).

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1112 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
56 Figure 46. Photographs of vegetated dune hummocks within the restoration area on 21 May 2021.

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1113 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
57 Figure 47. (cont’d from above) Photographs of vegetated dune hummocks within the restoration area on 21 May 2021.

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1114 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
58 Figure 48. Year 1 (top, four months after implementation) and Year 2 topographic map of restoration site.

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1115 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
59 Figure 49. Year 5 topographic map of restoration site. The survey boundary was extended to capture dune buildup along the outside of the fence line.

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1116 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
60 Figure 50. Photograph of sand build-up along the northern fence line in the restoration area (top: 9 May 2017, approximately five months after implementation; and bottom: 30 October 2020).

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1117 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
61 Figure 51. Sand buildup along the south side of the fencing (top) and along the east side of the fencing (bottom) on 30 March 2021.

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1118 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
62 Figure 52. Berm topography (top left: 17 December 2016, top right: 25 January 2017, bottom left: 8 March 2018, and bottom right: 13 August 2021).

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1119 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
63 Sand Deposition, Grain Size, and Organics
A set of baseline and post-restoration sand samples were collected from two control transects and four restoration transects on 13 December 2016 (baseline); 24 March and 13 September 2017; 24 May and 16 November 2018; 3 June and 6 November 2019; and 24 July 2020. Three samples were collected from each transect (approximately 3 meters south of the transect line to avoid footprints), including two dry samples off the 15 and 30 transect meter mark, and a wet sample near the waterline on the beach face.

Samples were weighed before and after drying to measure moisture content, then each sample was sorted using a set of sieves measuring from 2 mm (very fine pebbles) to 0.06 mm (very fine sand). A portion of each sample was also used to analyze organics based on the loss on ignition (LOI) method.

TBF conducts all sediment analyses in a laboratory located on the campus of LMU. Due to COVID-19 regulations and guidelines, TBF did not have access to the lab on LMU’s campus to complete sediment analyses. As a result, no sediment analyses were completed for Years 4 and 5. However, campus restrictions have recently lifted and TBF has begun sorting and prioritizing previously collected samples for analysis.

In Years 1-3 sand within the restoration site varied from pebbles (very fine) to very fine sand (Figure 53).

Small dunes and plant hummocks were observed to form with larger sized sediment at the base of the hummocks and finer grain sizes on top due to wind driven transport (Figure 54). Dry sand samples collected (averaged for 15 and 30 m) saw variable trends between surveys, with a small increase in very coarse sand and pebble percent composition within the restoration area (Figure 55 – Figure 57). The latest survey in November 2019 shows that coarse sand continues to be one of the most dominate grain size types. Visual observation in Years 4 and 5 support these previous findings of grain size distribution (Figure 54).

Figure 53. Sand grain in restoration site (left: pebbles; middle: coarse sand; right: medium to very fine sand).

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1120 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
64 Figure 54. Photographs showing larger grains at the base of the dune and finer grains on top due to aeolian processes (top: 29 April 2019; bottom: 5 February 2020).

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1121 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
65 Figure 55. Baseline (top) followed by post-restoration sand grain results for all transects (dry sample averages). 0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100
C1 C2 T1 T2 T3 T4
Control Restoration Area
Percent Composition (%)
Transect ID
Sand Grain (Baseline - December 2016)
Pebbles (Very Fine)
Sand (Very Course)
Sand (Course)
Sand (Medium)
Sand (Fine)
Sand (Very Fine)
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100
C1 C2 T1 T2 T3 T4
Control Restoration Area
Percent Composition (%)
Transect ID
Sand Grain (Post-Restoration - March 2017)
Pebbles (Very Fine)
Sand (Very Course)
Sand (Course)
Sand (Medium)
Sand (Fine)
Sand (Very Fine)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
C1 C2 T1 T2 T3 T4
Control Restoration Area
Percent Composition (%)
Transect ID
Sand Grain (Post-Restoration September 2017)
Pebbles (Very Fine)
Sand (Very Course)
Sand (Course)
Sand (Medium)
Sand (Fine)
Sand (Very Fine)

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1122 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
66 Figure 56 (cont’d from above). Post-restoration sand grain results for all transects (dry sample averages). 0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
C1 C2 T1 T2 T3 T4
Control Restoration Area
Percent Composition (%)
Transect ID
Sand Grain (Post-Restoration May 2018)
Pebbles (Very Fine)
Sand (Very Course)
Sand (Course)
Sand (Medium)
Sand (Fine)
Sand (Very Fine)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
C1 C2 T1 T2 T3 T4
Control Restoration Area
Percent Composition (%)
Transect ID
Sand Grain (Post-Restoration Nov 2018)
Pebbles (Very Fine)
Sand (Very Course)
Sand (Course)
Sand (Medium)
Sand (Fine)
Sand (Very Fine)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
C1 C2 T1 T2 T3 T4
Control Restoration
Percent Composition (%)
Transect ID
Sand Grain (Post-Restoration May 2019)
Pebbles (Very Fine)
Sand (Very Course)
Sand (Course)
Sand (Medium)
Sand (Fine)
Sand (Very Fine)

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1123 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
67 Figure 57 (cont’d from above). Post-restoration sand grain results for all transects (dry sample averages).

Wet sand results were reported separately (Table 9). Results from the wet sand samples were variable between the baseline survey and the post-restoration survey but displayed relatively similar results at both the control transects and the restoration transects. As the wet sand is outside of the area actively maintained for the restoration, the similarity between the control and restoration results for the wet sand was expected. The variability between the baseline and post-restoration surveys is likely due in part to the collection of the samples in two different wet sand locations based on the seasonal movement of the berm and wave erosion. Baseline sand composition, taken December 2016, was dominated by coarse and medium sand grains, and the data indicate an oscillation between medium grains during summer to coarse sand grains in winter season (Table 9). This shift in grain sizes is likely consistent with winter storms eroding the beach face followed by the deposition of sand in the calmer spring and summer months (Figure 58).

Figure 58. Photographs of eroded beach face following a winter king tide on 25 January 2017 (left) and a gentler sloping beach face on 15 August 2018 during summer season (right). 0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
C1 C2 T1 T2 T3 T4
Control Restoration
Percent Composition (%)
Transect ID
Sand Grain (Post-Restoration November 2019)
Pebbles (Very Fine)
Sand (Very Course)
Sand (Course)
Sand (Medium)
Sand (Fine)
Sand (Very Fine)

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1124 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
68 Table 9. Grain size results from December 2016 (baseline) and post-restoration (March 2017, September 2017, May 2018, November 2018, May 2019, November 2019).

Control Transects Restoration Area Transects
Grain Size C1 C2 T1 T2 T3 T4
Baseline
– wet
(Dec 2016)
Pebbles (Very Fine) 0.07% 0.00% 1.05% 0.88% 0.23% 0.33% Sand (Very Coarse) 0.38% 0.00% 0.68% 1.02% 1.57% 1.01%
Sand (Coarse) 78.52% 58.34% 8.01% 5.11% 93.44% 38.61%
Sand (Medium) 10.84% 33.34% 32.22% 17.19% 0.66% 32.12%
Sand (Fine) 10.12% 8.28% 57.01% 74.40% 4.00% 27.64%
Sand (Very Fine) 0.06% 0.05% 1.01% 1.35% 0.09% 0.27%
Post-Rest
–wet
(Mar 2017)
Pebbles (Very Fine) 0.21% 2.01% 7.91% 0.06% 0.69% 0.82% Sand (Very Coarse) 4.13% 9.22% 3.77% 2.91% 3.58% 5.82%
Sand (Coarse) 81.82% 78.78% 75.52% 95.89% 86.74% 88.43% Sand (Medium) 6.01% 5.69% 4.77% 0.67% 1.75% 1.36%
Sand (Fine) 7.72% 4.24% 7.91% 0.42% 2.06% 3.37%
Sand (Very Fine) 0.09% 0.05% 0.11% 0.04% 5.19% 0.16%
Post-Rest
–wet
(Sep 2017)
Pebbles (Very Fine) 0.11% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Sand (Very Coarse) 0.53% 1.17% 0.69% 0.00% 0.41% 0.40%
Sand (Coarse) 13.37% 4.69% 2.48% 2.33% 2.45% 2.38%
Sand (Medium) 64.53% 70.77% 51.31% 66.62% 62.40% 69.31% Sand (Fine) 21.16% 22.89% 44.98% 30.51% 34.33% 27.5%
Sand (Very Fine) 0.32% 0.47% 0.55% 0.55% 0.41% 0.40%
Post-Rest
–wet
(May 2018)
Pebbles (Very Fine) 0.10% 0.25% 0.13% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Sand (Very Coarse) 0.52% 0.74% 0.13% 0.30% 0.41% 0.42%
Sand (Coarse) 84.04% 72.65% 89.62% 86.21% 88.16% 80.21% Sand (Medium) 1.55% 5.82% 1.14% 1.35% 1.09% 1.88%
Sand (Fine) 13.47% 20.42% 8.73% 11.99% 10.20% 17.29%
Sand (Very Fine) 0.31% 0.12% 0.25% 0.15% 0.14% 0.21%
Post-Rest
–wet
(Nov 2018)
Pebbles (Very Fine) 0.39% 0.36% 0.38% 0.19% 0.20% 0.24% Sand (Very Coarse) 0.78% 0.54% 0.57% 0.37% 0.20% 0.48%
Sand (Coarse) 0.97% 1.26% 1.15% 0.93% 0.98% 1.21%
Sand (Medium) 81.75% 93.54% 96.36% 93.64% 97.65% 97.34% Sand (Fine) 14.76% 3.95% 1.53% 4.67% 0.98% 0.72%
Sand (Very Fine) 1.36% 0.36% 0.00% 0.19% 0.00% 0.00%
Post-Rest
–wet
(May 2019)
Pebbles (Very Fine) 0.10% 0.10% 0.85% 0.12% 0.00% 0.00% Sand (Very Coarse) 1.30% 1.28% 0.85% 1.60% 0.74% 1.13%
Sand (Coarse) 34.03% 19.78% 21.90% 67.20% 66.08% 69.33% Sand (Medium) 59.48% 65.55% 58.57% 25.52% 27.48% 24.07% Sand (Fine) 5.09% 13.19% 17.74% 5.43% 5.61% 5.39%
Sand (Very Fine) 0.00% 0.10% 0.08% 0.12% 0.09% 0.09%

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 1125 Attachment: SaMo-Beach-Project-Year-5_FINAL (1) (6227 : Santa Monica Beach Dune Restoration Phase 3 (30 min)) Year 5 Annual Report, December 2021
69 Control Transects Restoration Area Transects
Grain Size C1 C2 T1 T2 T3 T4
Post-Rest
–wet
(Nov 2019)
Pebbles (Very Fine) 0.81% 0.78% 0.52% 0.82% 0.52% 0.42% Sand (Very Coarse) 0.24% 0.28% 0.23% 0.36% 0.39% 0.36%
Sand (Coarse) 1.15% 1.28% 0.66% 0.76% 1.21% 0.87%
Sand (Medium) 89.28% 79.96% 4.13% 32.51% 93.01% 6.51%
Sand (Fine) 8.31% 17.23% 90.72% 64.93% 4.70% 90.20%
Sand (Very Fine) 0.13% 0.21% 2.44% 0.35% 0.11% 0.75%
Pebbles (Very Fine) 0.08% 0.26% 1.30% 0.27% 0.06% 0.89% Observationally, a shift in coarser sand and cobble was seen in the restoration site. Additionally, sand transport and deposition has been occurring along fence lines and around larger vegetation patches and wrack. High resolution elevation surveys confirm an increase in sand deposition along the fences and behind the berm.

A portion of each sediment sample was analyzed for organic matter and carbonate content using the loss on ignition (LOI) method (Figure 59). Samples were placed in weighted crucibles and weight loss was measured after heating the samples in a high-temperature furnace to remove organic matter. Figure 60 compares the average percent organics in dry sediments from the control site and restoration site by survey date. The restoration site shows a slightly higher overall percent organics composition in samples compared to the control site on each survey; however, there are only slight differences from the baseline (pre-restoration, December 2016). Sediments are an important site for organic matter decomposition and nutrient regeneration in coastal marine environments, and continued data collection may inform the effects the beach restoration project has on carbon cycling and transformations.

Santa Monica City CouncilAugust 27, 2024

Santa Monica City Council
August 27, 2024