Agenda packet — Santa Monica City Council, October 14, 2025 (part 4 of 8)

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

I am wriƟng to express my support for the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium restoraƟon project led by RevitalizaƟon Partners Group (RPG) and to urge you to extend the Exclusive NegoƟaƟng Agreement (ENA) by 6 months.

RPG has presented a design concept that preserves the Civic’s historic character while creaƟng a modern, accessible 3,000-seat performance venue. The plan maintains the building’s iconic exterior, includes essenƟal seismic upgrades and accessibility improvements, and adds complementary outdoor spaces and ameniƟes.

This project offers tremendous benefits to Santa Monica:
• Preserves our only building meeƟng all 6 landmarking criteria while returning it to its original purpose as a premier music venue • Provides significant economic impact through the cultural desƟnaƟon mulƟplier effect ($6 for every $1 in Ɵcket sales) • Revitalizes a dormant corner near 7 major hotels, the Expo line, and the freeway • Leverages federal tax credits already preliminarily approved by the California State Historic PreservaƟon Office RPG needs the 6-month extension to complete essenƟal detailed cost esƟmates and financial feasibility studies. This is a rare opportunity to revitalize downtown, help restore Santa Monica’s reputaƟon as a performance desƟnaƟon, and bring back the economic prosperity our city needs.

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely,
Nancy Gundlach
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 770 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 52 Mitchell Kois
From: Daniel Galamba <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 8:58 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: October 14, 2025 City Council Meeting Item 11.C-Support for RPG and City to continue the process to revitalize the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
I am sorry but this is item 11.C, not Item 5. Thank you.

Dr Daniel Galamba
________________________________________
From: Daniel Galamba <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2025 2:31 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; [email protected]; [email protected]; Jesse Zwick; [email protected] Subject: October 14, 2025 City Council MeeƟng Item 5-Support for RPG and City to conƟnue the process to revitalize the Civic Auditorium
Dear City Council and City Manager,
I urge you to conƟnue the negoƟaƟons with RPG so that our city can have a fully restored, state-of-the-art, Civic Auditorium. Santa Monica deserves nothing less.

Publicly owned venues for music and the arts are rare and important and should not be sold off or used for other purposes.

The fate of our historic Civic rests with you. RPG has conducted due diligence and prepared preliminary plans for an exciƟng world-class performing arts center at NO cost to taxpayers.

And by proposing a futurisƟc, exciƟng immersive experience, the Civic will aƩract a new generaƟon of residents and worldwide visitors, producing new revenue for our businesses and enhancing our city’s desƟnaƟon status.

I urge you to conƟnue to negoƟate in good faith with RPG. Ending discussions now would be a tragic missed opportunity and a huge loss for all of us.

Sincerely,
Dr Daniel Galamba
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 771 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 53 Mitchell Kois
From: Carolyn Hanlin <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 8:30 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

I am writing to express my support for the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium restoration project led by Revitalization Partners Group (RPG) and to urge you to extend the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) by 6 months.

This project offers tremendous benefits to Santa Monica:
• Preserves our only building meeting all 6 landmarking criteria while returning it to its original purpose as a premier music venue
• Provides significant economic impact through the cultural destination multiplier effect ($6 for every $1 in ticket sales)
• Revitalizes a dormant corner near 7 major hotels, the Expo line, and the freeway • Leverages federal tax credits already preliminarily approved by the California State Historic Preservation Office
RPG needs the 6-month extension to complete essential detailed cost estimates and financial feasibility studies. This is a rare opportunity to revitalize downtown, help restore Santa Monica’s reputation as a performance destination, and bring back the economic prosperity our city needs.

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely,
[Carolyn Hanllin]
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 772 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 54 Mitchell Kois
From: Lynne Schlosstein <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 8:15 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely,
Lynne Schlosstein
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 773 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 55 Mitchell Kois
From: JORDAN ELLIS <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 8:14 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely,
Jordan Ellis
Sunset Park resident
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 774 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 56 Mitchell Kois
From: ALICE ELLIS <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 8:14 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium
Importance: High

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely,
Alice Ellis, 90405
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 775 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 57 Mitchell Kois
From: Dave Childs <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 8:09 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely,
David Childs
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 776 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 58 Mitchell Kois
From: Lynda M Rush <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 7:39 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely,
Lynda Rush
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 777 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 59 Mitchell Kois
From: Hal Jaffe <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 7:02 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely,

HAROLD JAFFE
2626 34TH ST
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 778 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 60 Mitchell Kois
From: Hal Jaffe <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 7:01 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely,

HAROLD JAFFE
2626 34TH ST
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 779 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 61 Mitchell Kois
From: janet rt <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 7:00 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely,
Janet Tunick,
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 780 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 62 Mitchell Kois
From: John Reynolds <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 6:12 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers, I am writing to express my support for the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium restoration project led by Revitalization Partners Group (RPG) and to urge you to extend the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) by 6 months. RPG has presented a design concept that preserves the Civic’s historic character while creating a modern, accessible 3,000-seat performance venue. The plan maintains the building’s iconic exterior, includes essential seismic upgrades and accessibility improvements, and adds complementary outdoor spaces and amenities. This project offers tremendous benefits to Santa Monica: • Preserves our only building meeting all 6 landmarking criteria while returning it to its original purpose as a premier music venue • Provides significant economic impact through the cultural destination multiplier effect ($6 for every $1 in ticket sales) • Revitalizes a dormant corner near 7 major hotels, the Expo line, and the freeway • Leverages federal tax credits already preliminarily approved by the California State Historic Preservation Office RPG needs the 6-month extension to complete essential detailed cost estimates and financial feasibility studies. This is a rare opportunity to revitalize downtown, help restore Santa Monica’s reputation as a performance destination, and bring back the economic prosperity our city needs. Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months. Sincerely, John Reynolds 3217 17th street
213-598-2120
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 781 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 63 Mitchell Kois
From: Shane Murphy <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 4:51 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely,
Shane Murphy
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 782 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 64 Mitchell Kois
From: Kelley McIntosh <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 2:05 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely,
Kelley McIntosh
SM Resident
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 783 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 65 Mitchell Kois
From: Jerry <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 11:46 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely,
Jerry Nodiff
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 784 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 66 Mitchell Kois
From: ALAN MONT <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 10:18 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Fwd: City Council Mtg Oct 14- Support item 5

EXTERNAL
Begin forwarded message:

From: ALAN MONT <[email protected]>
Subject: City Council Mtg Oct 14- Support item 5
Date: October 12, 2025 at 11:48:35 AM PDT
To: Lana Negrete SM City Council <[email protected]>, Dan Hall SM City Council <[email protected]>, Ellis Raskin SM City Council <[email protected]>, Jesse Zwick SM City Council <[email protected]>, Natalya Zernitskaya SM City Council <[email protected]>, Barry Snell SM City Council <[email protected]>, Oliver Chi SM <[email protected]>, Caroline Torosis SM City Council <[email protected]>
City Council Members and City Manager,
I am writing to urge your SUPPORT of Item 5 at the next city council meeting on October 14th.

We have a tremendous opportunity to bring life back to our city by restoring the Civic Auditorium.

RPG has a vision, and we should continue negotiating with them until a final product is produced.

If we allow this opportunity to pass then that window will close for years to come- maybe forever!
Let’s make Santa Monica proud and create this world class auditorium in our world class city.

Thank you,
Alan Mont
818-261-8172
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 785 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 67 Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 786 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 68 Mitchell Kois
From: Larry Birstock <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 10:10 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely,
Larry Birstock
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 787 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 69 Mitchell Kois
From: Lauren Marie <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 10:08 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely,
Lauren Wyka
821 Bay
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 788 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 70 Mitchell Kois
From: Kevin McCarthy <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 10:03 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely,
Kevin McCarthy
1206 Grant St
SM 90405
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 789 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 71 Mitchell Kois
From: Nina Girvetz <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 9:54 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Once again I am wriƟng to express my support for the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium restoraƟon project led by RevitalizaƟon Partners Group (RPG) and to urge you to extend the Exclusive NegoƟaƟng Agreement (ENA) by 6 months.

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely,
Nina Girvetz
Ocean Park resident since 1985
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 790 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 72 Mitchell Kois
From: Sue Edwards <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 9:50 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Councilmembers,
Please conƟnue the exclusive negoƟaƟon agreement with RPG group to restore our Civic Auditorium as a concert and event venue.

Please do not be misled by false and incorrect statements made in a recent arƟcle in Santa Monica Forward.

Thank you.

Sue Edwards
428 - 15th St.
90402
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 791 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 73 Mitchell Kois
From: Mary Donovan <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 9:42 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely,
[Mary Donovan r name]

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 792 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 74 Mitchell Kois
From: Lauri Fraser <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 9:41 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-D - OPPOSE Covenant and Ordinance Changing the Zoning of 2644 30th St.

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

I urge you to
a) reject the 10-year deed restricƟon limiƟng only housing development at 2644 30th Street, b) oppose the ordinance upzoning of 2644 30th Street from residenƟal to commercial, and c) instruct Staff to return with rescission of the LUCE amendment.

The property, which is NOT located on a boulevard, currently has a 2-story office building daƟng from the 1950s and a surface parking lot. It is zoned R1 (residenƟal). The owner(s) want the property rezoned to Neighborhood Commercial (NC), which would allow it eventually to be redeveloped to 85 feet in height, with the current 55-foot height limit on Ocean Park Blvd. plus state density bonuses. This would be directly across 29th and 30th Streets from 1- and 2-story homes.

The proposed 10-year restricƟon on developing housing projects is merely a short-term reprieve from a tower shading the low-rise residenƟal neighborhood, and it offers no protecƟon against commercial acƟvity, which our General Plan specifically limits to the boulevards.

Procedural flaws with this spot upzoning include the following:

City Staff conƟnue to state that the parcel R1 (residenƟal) zoning was an “inadvertent error” in the 2010 LUCE, but this appears to be untrue. The LUCE update involved a lengthy process intended to protect residenƟal neighborhoods from commercial acƟvity, which was limited to the boulevards.

The City Staff and City AƩorney have spent a year helping the property owner upzone the parcel without disclosing this relaƟonship to the public.

City Staff allowed the owner to both skip the applicaƟon process for a zoning change and avoid paying $34,000 in applicaƟon fees.

The retail center on Ocean Park Blvd. between 29th and 30th, currently zoned Neighborhood Commercial, already extends further into the residenƟal neighborhood than the NC zones on the adjacent blocks. Upzoning even a porƟon of the 2644 30th parcel creates a “peninsula” of commercial use in a residenƟal neighborhood, and it is spot-zoning.

Upzoning to Neighborhood Commercial would also create addiƟonal density, traffic, parking shortages, noise, and infrastructure strain. Staff has provided no legiƟmate jusƟficaƟon for this upzoning. Proceeding virtually guarantees costly liƟgaƟon against the city. It also sets a dangerous precedent, opening floodgates for upzoning throughout all residenƟal neighborhoods. Other developers are waiƟng to follow suit, which will erode residents’ trust in local government and further exacerbate our already strained city resources.

Again, I urge you to a) reject the 10-year deed restricƟon limiƟng only housing development at 2644 30th Street, b) oppose the ordinance upzoning of 2644 30th Street, and c) instruct Staff to return with rescission of the LUCE amendment.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 793 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 75 Sincerely,
Lauri Fraser
Sent from my blow dryer
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 794 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 76 Mitchell Kois
From: Dannie Charney <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 9:39 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-D - OPPOSE Covenant and Ordinance Changing the Zoning of 2644 30th St.

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

I urge you to
a) reject the 10-year deed restriction limiting only housing development at 2644 30th Street, b) oppose the ordinance upzoning of 2644 30th Street from residential to commercial, and c) instruct Staff to return with rescission of the LUCE amendment.

The proposed 10-year restriction on developing housing projects is merely a short-term reprieve from a tower shading the low-rise residential neighborhood, and it offers no protection against commercial activity, which our General Plan specifically limits to the boulevards.

Procedural flaws with this spot upzoning include the following:

City Staff continue to state that the parcel R1 (residential) zoning was an “inadvertent error” in the 2010 LUCE, but this appears to be untrue. The LUCE update involved a lengthy process intended to protect residential neighborhoods from commercial activity, which was limited to the boulevards.

The City Staff and City Attorney have spent a year helping the property owner upzone the parcel without disclosing this relationship to the public.

City Staff allowed the owner to both skip the application process for a zoning change and avoid paying $34,000 in application fees.

The retail center on Ocean Park Blvd. between 29th and 30th, currently zoned Neighborhood Commercial, already extends further into the residential neighborhood than the NC zones on the adjacent blocks. Upzoning even a portion of the 2644 30th parcel creates a “peninsula” of commercial use in a residential neighborhood, and it is spot-zoning.

Proceeding virtually guarantees costly litigation against the city. It also sets a dangerous precedent, opening floodgates for upzoning throughout all residential neighborhoods. Other developers are waiting to follow suit, which will erode residents’ trust in local government and further exacerbate our already strained city resources.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 795 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 77 Again, I urge you to a) reject the 10-year deed restriction limiting only housing development at 2644 30th Street, b) oppose the ordinance upzoning of 2644 30th Street, and c) instruct Staff to return with rescission of the LUCE amendment.

Please stop the total destruction of what is left of our city. Say no to this and all SMF and developer demands on our residential areas.

Enough greed and short sightedness by all these groups.

Sincerely,
Danielle Charney
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 796 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 78 Mitchell Kois
From: Dannie Charney <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 9:36 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Please do not let SMF and it's developer lobby override this chance to restore history and dignity to our town. God knows, they have done enough damage and nothing is enough for them. Don't let them destroy this too.

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely,
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 797 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 79 Danielle Charney
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 798 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 80 Mitchell Kois
From: Alex Novakovich <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 9:34 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-D - OPPOSE Covenant and Ordinance Changing the Zoning of 2644 30th St.

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Procedural flaws with this spot upzoning include the following:

The City Staff and City AƩorney have spent a year helping the property owner upzone the parcel without disclosing this relaƟonship to the public.

City Staff allowed the owner to both skip the applicaƟon process for a zoning change and avoid paying $34,000 in applicaƟon fees.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 799 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 81 Sincerely,
Alex Novakovich
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 800 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 82 Mitchell Kois
From: Alex Novakovich <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 9:33 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely,
Alex Novakovich
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 801 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 83 Mitchell Kois
From: Peter Taffae <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 9:15 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Keep civic center

EXTERNAL
Please don’t vote to give away our heritage
Get Outlook for iOS
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 802 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 84 Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 8:52 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: Civic Auditorium (item11C)

EXTERNAL
Date:10 12 2025

To: [email protected]
cc: [email protected], [email protected]
RE: Support for RPG and City to continue the process to revitalize the Civic Auditorium (Item 11C)

City Council and City Manager,
I urge you to continue the negotiations with RPG so that our city can have a fully restored, state-of-theart, Civic Auditorium. Santa Monica deserves nothing less.

Publicly owned venues for music and the arts are rare and important and should not be sold off or used for other purposes.

The fate of our historic Civic rests with you. RPG has conducted due diligence and prepared preliminary plans for an exciting world-class performing arts center at NO cost to taxpayers.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 803 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 85 And by proposing a futuristic, exciting immersive experience, the Civic will attract a new generation of residents and worldwide visitors, producing new revenue for our businesses and enhancing our city’s destination status.

I urge you to continue to negotiate in good faith with RPG. Ending discussions now would be a tragic missed opportunity and a huge loss for all of us.

Thank you.

Howard Eliash
521 Montana Ave. # 204
Santa Monica , CA 90403
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 804 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 86 Mitchell Kois
From: Marc Verville <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 8:02 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Cc: [email protected]; 'Info Save the Civic'; [email protected]; councilmtgitems Subject: SMCC 2025-10-14 Item 11.C. - Please approve Revitalization Partners Group's (RPG) request for a 6-month Exclusive Negotiating Agreement extension Attachments: SMCC 2025-10-14 Item 11.C. - Written Comment - Verville 10-12-2025.pdf Importance: High

EXTERNAL
Dear City Council and City Manager Chi,
Re: SMCC 2025-10-14 Item 11.C. - Approval of First ModificaƟon to Exclusive NegoƟaƟon Agreement with RevitalizaƟon Partners Group, LLC (RPG) for the Civic Center Auditorium RenovaƟon, Programming and OperaƟon
This note is to strong urge you to select Staff OpƟon #1, Approve a six-month extension (two consecuƟve 90- day periods). As staff notes, this opƟon would conƟnue negoƟaƟons with RPG, while preserving the City’s ability to terminate if no viable plan emerges as prudent. This aligns with RPG’s sole request at this Ɵme which is a 180-day extension of the Exclusive NegoƟaƟon Agreement (ENA) in order to study and quanƟfy the financial and other impacts before any deal is finalized.

There are several major economic posiƟves in the RPG proposal that cannot be duplicated by any alternaƟve use of the site.

1. First, in their presentaƟon “The Santa Monica Civic Reimagined”, RPG repeatedly states that their proposal will require NO City money or bonds to realize this project. The RPG presentaƟon is Ɵtled “The Santa Monica Civic Reimagined” and can be found at: hƩps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTuyiJx0Bk4

2. Second, they are including a new park on the site of the exisƟng parking lot, adding green open space to the sector of the City which has the highest rate of densificaƟon.

3. Third, the eliminaƟon of parking will increase capacity uƟlizaƟon of the City’s exisƟng downtown parking faciliƟes by venue visitors. These faciliƟes generate General Fund revenues which the Council has declared to be of the highest priority for the City both in this Fiscal Emergency and for its long-term financial stability.

4. Fourth, the influx of visitors will form the nexus of economic revitalizaƟon and growth of all of Santa Monica’s unique revenue-generaƟng desƟnaƟon assets that include the Pier, the Promenade, Santa Monica Place, and the city’s large hotel footprint. Increasing hotel occupancy rates will, through the Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 805 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 87 Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT), generate one of the highest immediate posiƟve revenue impacts to the General Fund as it is one of the Fund’s highest revenue streams.

5. FiŌh, and criƟcally, RPG esƟmates that visitors this venue will spend an average of $300 per day, excluding Ɵcket prices. This represents an almost tenfold (10x) spend compared to the $33.47 total esƟmated 2024 daily spend for Daytrip Visitors that was noted in the HR&A analysis of the LA28 Olympic Volleyball proposal (see SMCC 2024-10-08 Item 7.A. - HR&A Advisors Full Report - AƩach 17146) The criƟcality to the City’s finances of the last two points cannot be overstated! The cratering of the City’s commercial economy, and therefore the City’s finances, is directly related to the precipitous declines in both visitors and their spending, as the following charts developed the Economic Impact Reports for the period 2017-2023 prepared by SM Travel & Tourism (SMTT):

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 806 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) Dear City Council and City Manager Chi,
Re: SMCC 2025-10-14 Item 11.C. - Approval of First Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement with Revitalization Partners Group, LLC (RPG) for the Civic Center Auditorium Renovation, Programming and Operation
This note is to strong urge you to select Staff Option #1, Approve a six-month extension (two consecutive 90- day periods). As staff notes, this option would continue negotiations with RPG, while preserving the City’s ability to terminate if no viable plan emerges as prudent. This aligns with RPG’s sole request at this time which is a 180-day extension of the Exclusive Negotiation Agreement (ENA) in order to study and quantify the financial and other impacts before any deal is finalized.

There are several major economic positives in the RPG proposal that cannot be duplicated by any alternative use of the site.

1. First, in their presentation “The Santa Monica Civic Reimagined”, RPG repeatedly states that their proposal will require NO City money or bonds to realize this project. The RPG presentation is titled “The Santa Monica Civic Reimagined” and can be found at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTuyiJx0Bk4

2. Second, they are including a new park on the site of the existing parking lot, adding green open space to the sector of the City which has the highest rate of densification.

3. Third, the elimination of parking will increase capacity utilization of the City’s existing downtown parking facilities by venue visitors. These facilities generate General Fund revenues which the Council has declared to be of the highest priority for the City both in this Fiscal Emergency and for its long-term financial stability.

4. Fourth, the influx of visitors will form the nexus of economic revitalization and growth of all of Santa Monica’s unique revenue-generating destination assets that include the Pier, the Promenade, Santa Monica Place, and the city’s large hotel footprint. Increasing hotel occupancy rates will, through the Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT), generate one of the highest immediate positive revenue impacts to the General Fund as it is one of the Fund’s highest revenue streams.

5. Fifth, and critically, RPG estimates that visitors this venue will spend an average of $300 per day, excluding ticket prices. This represents an almost tenfold (10x) spend compared to the $33.47 total estimated 2024 daily spend for Daytrip Visitors that was noted in the HR&A analysis of the LA28 Olympic Volleyball proposal (see SMCC 2024-10-08 Item 7.A. - HR&A Advisors Full Report - Attach 17146) The criticality to the City’s finances of the last two points cannot be overstated! The cratering of the City’s commercial economy, and therefore the City’s finances, is directly related to the precipitous declines in both visitors and their spending, as the following charts developed the Economic Impact Reports for the period 2017-2023 prepared by SM Travel & Tourism (SMTT):

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 807 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) There is NO OTHER OPTION for the site that can deliver the scale of benefits to the City that the RPG proposal provides. In addition to the direct economic multiplier that the RPG proposal provides, the City can increase the economic benefits even more by using the revitalized Civic as the catalyst to change its entire approach to managing its destination assets. Specifically, the City can abandon it’s legacy siloed asset management policies Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 808 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) and adopt a comprehensive, and integrated, destination asset portfolio asset management process. In this, the City can amplify economic benefits by coordinating the programming across all public destination assets and partnering with owners of the private assets to extend programming and synergistic activities. That asset portfolio includes:
• Year-round Mediterranean weather
• A live entertainment venue at the Civic Center
• SM Place shopping
• Promenade dining and entertainment
• 245 acres of world class beach
• A globally branded and historic pleasure pier
• Comprehensive hotel options
The city’s unique destination asset portfolio cannot be duplicated by Westfield, Caruso or any other singlevenue destination.

If RPG is not granted a 180-day extension of the ENA in order to study and quantify the financial and other impacts before any deal is finalized, then it will be clear that the City has no interest in economic revitalization within an environment of no other comparable revenue generating options and growth opportunities of this magnitude. Since housing is a net driver of increased General Fund costs, any option that includes that use will be economically counter-productive. And, the opportunity that the Civic represents will be lost forever.

It should also be noted that:

1. The staff report’s assertion that the City has not received any financial documentation or pro forma demonstrating the project’s financial feasibility appears to be a bit disingenuous since such data will be a deliverable of the conclusion of the requested ENA extension and

2. Staff’s attempt to independently develop a financial model by definition has significant economic omissions that only RPG can provide given its hands on experience in this field. As such, the City’s analysis by nonsubject matter experts (SME) is heavily biased in the downside.

3. In addition, Staff’s independently developed financial model omits hotel TOT uplift, sales tax uplifts, or Pier revenue uplifts noted, just to state a few omissions on the economic impact to the City. Such an analysis, executed without input from RPG (the SME here), should neither be attempted nor any such analysis output be used as the basis for any decision whatsoever.

I do not think it is hyperbole to state that denial of a 6-month ENA extension will represent active support of permanent city economic decline.

Please approve RPG’s request for a 6-month ENA extension.

Thank you,
Marc L. Verville
Former Audit Subcommittee Chair
Sunset Park, Santa Monica
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 809 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) nb: I have also attached a PDF of this note in case the charts are not included in the body of this email Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 810 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 88 Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 811 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 89 There is NO OTHER OPTION for the site that can deliver the scale of benefits to the City that the RPG proposal provides. In addiƟon to the direct economic mulƟplier that the RPG proposal provides, the City can increase the economic benefits even more by using the revitalized Civic as the catalyst to change its enƟre approach to managing its desƟnaƟon assets. Specifically, the City can abandon it’s legacy siloed asset management policies and adopt a comprehensive, and integrated, desƟnaƟon asset porƞolio asset management process. In this, the City can amplify economic benefits by coordinaƟng the programming across all public desƟnaƟon assets and partnering with owners of the private assets to extend programming and synergisƟc acƟviƟes. That asset porƞolio includes:
 Year-round Mediterranean weather
 A live entertainment venue at the Civic Center
 SM Place shopping
 Promenade dining and entertainment
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 812 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 90  245 acres of world class beach
 A globally branded and historic pleasure pier
 Comprehensive hotel opƟons
The city’s unique desƟnaƟon asset porƞolio cannot be duplicated by Wesƞield, Caruso or any other singlevenue desƟnaƟon.

If RPG is not granted a 180-day extension of the ENA in order to study and quanƟfy the financial and other impacts before any deal is finalized, then it will be clear that the City has no interest in economic revitalizaƟon within an environment of no other comparable revenue generaƟng opƟons and growth opportuniƟes of this magnitude. Since housing is a net driver of increased General Fund costs, any opƟon that includes that use will be economically counter-producƟve. And, the opportunity that the Civic represents will be lost forever.

It should also be noted that:

1. The staff report’s asserƟon that the City has not received any financial documentaƟon or pro forma demonstraƟng the project’s financial feasibility appears to be a bit disingenuous since such data will be a deliverable of the conclusion of the requested ENA extension and

2. Staff’s aƩempt to independently develop a financial model by definiƟon has significant economic omissions that only RPG can provide given its hands on experience in this field. As such, the City’s analysis by non-subject maƩer experts (SME) is heavily biased in the downside.

3. In addiƟon, Staff’s independently developed financial model omits hotel TOT upliŌ, sales tax upliŌs, or Pier revenue upliŌs noted, just to state a few omissions on the economic impact to the City. Such an analysis, executed without input from RPG (the SME here), should neither be aƩempted nor any such analysis output be used as the basis for any decision whatsoever.

I do not think it is hyperbole to state that denial of a 6-month ENA extension will represent acƟve support of permanent city economic decline.

Please approve RPG’s request for a 6-month ENA extension.

Thank you,
Marc L. Verville
Former Audit SubcommiƩee Chair
Sunset Park, Santa Monica
nb: I have also aƩached a PDF of this note in case the charts are not included in the body of this email Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 813 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 91 Mitchell Kois
From: Elizabeth Van Denburgh <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 7:57 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis
Subject: 11c - SUPPORT Extension of RPG term for Civic ENA

EXTERNAL
Dear Santa Monica City Council Members,
I am wriƟng to express my strong support for the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium restoraƟon project led by RevitalizaƟon Partners Group (RPG) and to urge you to extend the Exclusive NegoƟaƟng Agreement (ENA) by six months.

RPG has presented an exciƟng and thoughƞul design concept that preserves the Civic’s historic character while creaƟng a modern, accessible 2,500-3,000 seat performance venue. The plan maintains the building’s iconic exterior, includes essenƟal seismic upgrades and full accessibility improvements, and adds complementary outdoor spaces and ameniƟes.

This project offers tremendous benefits to Santa Monica:
• Preserves our only building meeƟng all six landmarking criteria while returning it to its original purpose as a premier music venue • Provides significant economic impact through the cultural desƟnaƟon mulƟplier effect (approximately $6 in local economic acƟvity for every $1 in Ɵcket sales) • Revitalizes a dormant corner and helps restore Santa Monica’s reputaƟon as a performance desƟnaƟon • Leverages federal tax credits already preliminarily approved by the California State Historic PreservaƟon Office • Perfect locaƟon near seven major hotels, the Expo line, and freeway access RPG needs the six-month extension to complete essenƟal detailed cost esƟmates and financial feasibility studies. This addiƟonal Ɵme is necessary to structure a sound lease agreement and minimize downstream surprises in this complex, mulƟmillion-dollar project.

This is one of our last and biggest opportuniƟes to revitalize downtown and bring back the economic prosperity our city so criƟcally needs. We cannot afford to let this transformaƟve project slip away due to an insufficient Ɵmeline.

Please extend the ENA agreement to allow RPG the Ɵme needed to properly validate this project for our city’s future.

Thank you for your consideraƟon.

Sincerely,
Elizabeth Van Denburgh
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 814 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 92 Mitchell Kois
From: Anna Marie <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 7:54 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis
Subject: 11c - SUPPORT Extension of RPG term for Civic ENA

RPG needs the six-month extension to complete essential detailed cost estimates and financial feasibility studies. This additional time is necessary to structure a sound lease agreement and minimize downstream surprises in this complex, multimillion-dollar project. This is one of our last and biggest opportunities to revitalize downtown and bring back the economic prosperity our city so critically needs. We cannot afford to let this transformative project slip away due to an insufficient timeline. Please extend the ENA agreement to allow RPG the time needed to properly validate this project for our city’s future.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
Anna Marie Howell
938 5th Street
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 815 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 93 Mitchell Kois
From: ELLEN PHILLIPS <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 7:20 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi
Subject: Save our Civic Auditorium (Item 11C)

Publicly owned venues for music and the arts are
rare and important and should not be sold off or
used for other purposes.

The fate of our historic Civic rests with you. RPG
has conducted due diligence and
prepared preliminary plans for an exciting worldclass performing arts center at NO cost to taxpayers.

And by proposing a futuristic, exciting immersive
experience, the Civic will attract a new generation
of residents and worldwide visitors, producing new
revenue for our businesses and enhancing our
city’s destination status.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 816 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 94 I urge you to continue to negotiate in good faith
with RPG. Ending discussions now would be a
tragic missed opportunity and a huge loss for all of
us.

Thank you.

Ellen Phillips
101 Marguerita Ave
Santa Monica, CA 90402
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 817 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 95 Mitchell Kois
From: GARY <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 6:50 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: Save the Civic

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
Please don't pass up this golden opportunity with RPG. They've clearly done some extraordinary work so far and, as a long-time resident since 1975, I believe their plans are sound.

The fact that no taxpayer money is involved is a major bonus.

Also, I'd ask that you ignore anything that Santa Monica Forward is attempting to say; clearly, they're out of touch with reality and don't have a clue.

Thanks for your consideration.

Best,
Gary Gurner
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 818 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 96 Mitchell Kois
From: Stephen Nathan <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 6:13 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Save The Civic!!

EXTERNAL
I am a longƟme Santa Monica resident, having lived here for 38 years. Bringing back the Civic would add so much to the city culturally and economically. It’s Ɵme to give something to the residents of Santa Monica in addiƟon to helping the needy in the city. I am a big supporter of the Peoples Concern and other programs that help the less fortunate, but it seems that hard working tax paying residents have someƟmes been overlooked. Business is leaving, the Promenade is a shadow of its former self and the Mall is clearly struggling. Saving the Civic is a wonderful first step in bringing back the vitality and soul of Santa Monica!
Sincerely,
Stephen Nathan
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 819 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 97 Mitchell Kois
From: Lindsay Flickinger <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 4:50 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis
Subject: 11c - SUPPORT Extension of RPG term for Civic ENA

Please extend the ENA agreement to allow RPG the Ɵme needed to properly validate this project for our city’s future.

Thank you for your consideraƟon.

Sincerely,
[Your name]Lindsay Flickinger
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 820 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 98 Mitchell Kois
From: Coleman, Anne L. <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 4:28 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Support for RPG’s vision of a refurbished Civic Center

EXTERNAL
Please vote in favor and support the refurbishment of the Civic Center by RPG. I am a Santa Monica homeowner.

Thanks,
Anne
Anne L Coleman, MD, PhD
Chair, Department of Ophthalmology
Director of JSEI
AffiliaƟon Chair of DEI
Bradley R Straatsma Endowed chair
________________________________
UCLA HEALTH SCIENCES IMPORTANT WARNING: This email (and any aƩachments) is only intended for the use of the person or enƟty to which it is addressed, and may contain informaƟon that is privileged and confidenƟal. You, the recipient, are obligated to maintain it in a safe, secure and confidenƟal manner. Unauthorized redisclosure or failure to maintain confidenƟality may subject you to federal and state penalƟes. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately noƟfy us by return email, and delete this message from your computer.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 821 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 99 Mitchell Kois
From: Ellen Rose <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 4:06 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis
Subject: 11c - SUPPORT Extension of RPG term for Civic ENA

Please extend the ENA agreement to allow RPG the Ɵme needed to properly validate this project for our city’s future.

Thank you for your kind consideraƟon.

Sincerely,
Ellen Rose
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 822 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 100
Mitchell Kois
From: Helen C Corrigan <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 3:43 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Nia Tang; Jennifer Taylor Subject: May 28, 2024 Agenda iten 4D

EXTERNAL
Dear City Council,
I urge you to extend negoƟaƟons with RPG regarding the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium.

The opportunity to have a major performing arts venue in our community is a one-of-a-kind chance for Santa Monica to claim the cultural status it deserves.

The visuals RPG has submiƩed demonstrate the group’s respect for the landmark architecture of the building. The fact that it will be revitalized at no cost to our city makes the proposal even more aƩracƟve.

Despite the city’s current dire financial straits, it is criƟcal that we think long-term. A revitalized Civic has the potenƟal to generate business and tax revenue many Ɵmes over.

I hope you agree that it is in the city’s best interest to allow RPG to explore more in-depth financial analyses and projecƟons.

Helen Corrigan
2500 4th Street #8
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 823 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 101
Mitchell Kois
From: Lisa <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 2:44 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis
Subject: 11c - SUPPORT Extension of RPG term for Civic ENA

EXTERNAL
Dear Santa Monica City Council Members,
My husband and I are longtime Santa Monica residents and want to bring the Civic Center back.

I am writing to express my strong support for the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium restoration project led by Revitalization Partners Group (RPG) and to urge you to extend the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) by six months.

RPG has presented an exciting and thoughtful design concept that preserves the Civic’s historic character while creating a modern, accessible 2,500-3,000 seat performance venue. The plan maintains the building’s iconic exterior, includes essential seismic upgrades and full accessibility improvements, and adds complementary outdoor spaces and amenities.

This is one of our last and biggest opportunities to revitalize downtown and bring back the economic prosperity our city so critically needs. We cannot afford to let this transformative project slip away due to an insufficient timeline.

Please extend the ENA agreement to allow RPG the time needed to properly validate this project for our city’s future.

Thank you for your consideration.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 824 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 102
Best,
Lisa & Christopher Stilson
837 Lincoln Blvd #8
Santa Monica, CA 90403
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 825 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 103
Mitchell Kois
From: Miriam Alpern <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 2:33 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis
Subject: 11c - SUPPORT Extension of RPG term for Civic ENA

Please extend the ENA agreement to allow RPG the Ɵme needed to properly validate this project for our city’s future.

Thank you for your consideraƟon.

Sincerely,
- Miriam Alpern
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 826 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 104
Mitchell Kois
From: Claudia Dikinis <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 2:23 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: 11c - SUPPORT Extension of RPG term for Civic ENA

EXTERNAL
Dear Santa Monica City Council Members, I am writing to express my strong support for the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium restoration project led by Revitalization Partners Group (RPG) and to urge you to extend the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) by six months. RPG has presented an exciting and thoughtful design concept that preserves the Civic’s historic character while creating a modern, accessible 2,500-3,000 seat performance venue. The plan maintains the building’s iconic exterior, includes essential seismic upgrades and full accessibility improvements, and adds complementary outdoor spaces and amenities. This project offers tremendous benefits to Santa Monica: • Preserves our only building meeting all six landmarking criteria while returning it to its original purpose as a premier music venue • Provides significant economic impact through the cultural destination multiplier effect (approximately $6 in local economic activity for every $1 in ticket sales) • Revitalizes a dormant corner and helps restore Santa Monica’s reputation as a performance destination • Leverages federal tax credits already preliminarily approved by the California State Historic Preservation Office • Perfect location near seven major hotels, the Expo line, and freeway access RPG needs the six-month extension to complete essential detailed cost estimates and financial feasibility studies. This additional time is necessary to structure a sound lease agreement and minimize downstream surprises in this complex, multimillion-dollar project. This is one of our last and biggest opportunities to revitalize downtown and bring back the economic prosperity our city so critically needs. We cannot afford to let this transformative project slip away due to an insufficient timeline.

Please extend the ENA agreement to allow RPG the time needed to properly validate this project for our city’s future. Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely, Claudia Dobkins Dikinis,
Santa Monica Resident for 48 years
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 827 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 105
Mitchell Kois
From: Andrew Max Cahn <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 2:15 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis
Subject: 11c - SUPPORT Extension of RPG term for Civic ENA

EXTERNAL
Hello Dear Santa Monica City Council Members,
Santa Monica needs help.

I am wriƟng to express my strong support for the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium restoraƟon project led by RevitalizaƟon Partners Group (RPG) and to urge you to extend the Exclusive NegoƟaƟng Agreement (ENA) by six months.

Please extend the ENA agreement to allow RPG the Ɵme needed to properly validate this project for our city’s future.

Thank you for your consideraƟon.

Sincerely
Andrew M Cahn
Resident, designer, fan of Santa Monica since 1986 and advocate for the city’s renewal.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 828 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 106
Mitchell Kois
From: Chrissi Durbin <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 2:08 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis
Subject: 11c - SUPPORT Extension of RPG term for Civic ENA

Please extend the ENA agreement to allow RPG the Ɵme needed to properly validate this project for our city’s future.

Thank you for your consideraƟon.

Sincerely,
Chris Durbin
PLEASE
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 829 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 107
Mitchell Kois
From: Len Billet <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 1:53 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis
Subject: 11c - SUPPORT Extension of RPG term for Civic ENA

Please extend the ENA agreement to allow RPG the time needed to properly validate this project for our city’s future.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
Leonard Billet
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 830 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 108
Mitchell Kois
From: Claudia Dikinis <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 1:21 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: Extend the ENA for RPG + The Civic Cente

EXTERNAL
to: [email protected]
cc: [email protected], [email protected], barry.snell@sant amonica.gov, [email protected], [email protected], natalya.zernitsk [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Extend the ENA for RPG + The Civic Center
Dear Santa Monica City Council Members,
I am writing to express my strong support for the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium restoration project led by Revitalization Partners Group (RPG) and to urge you to extend the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) by six months.

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 831 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 109
RPG needs the six-month extension to complete essential detailed cost estimates and financial feasibility studies. This additional time is necessary to structure a sound lease agreement and minimize downstream surprises in this complex, multimillion-dollar project.

Please extend the ENA agreement to allow RPG the time needed to properly validate this project for our city’s future.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
Claudia Dobkins Dikinis,
Santa Monica Resident for 48 Years
<^..^>
***************************************************************** "By words the mind is winged." - Aristophanes
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 832 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 110
Mitchell Kois
From: josecolmano <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 1:07 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis
Subject: 11c - SUPPORT Extension of RPG term for Civic ENA

Please extend the ENA agreement to allow RPG the time needed to properly validate this project for our city’s future.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
Josef and Irene Colman
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 833 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 111
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 834 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 112
Mitchell Kois
From: Charlotte Wolter <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 12:58 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis
Subject: 11c - SUPPORT Extension of RPG term for Civic ENA

EXTERNAL
Dear Santa Monica City Council Members,
I am writing to express my support for the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium restoration project led by Revitalization Partners Group (RPG) and to urge you to extend the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) by six months.

RPG has presented an interesting and thoughtful design concept that preserves the Civic’s historic character while creating a modern, accessible 2,500-3,000 seat performance venue. The plan maintains the building’s iconic exterior, which is important. RPG adds that the restoration includes essential seismic upgrades, full accessibility improvements and complementary outdoor spaces and amenities. I will leave evaluation of those elements to you.

This project appears to offer benefits to Santa Monica:
• Preserves the only building meeting all six landmarking criteria -- I don't know what those are, but I hope you do -- while returning it to its original purpose as a premier music venue • May provide significant economic impact as a cultural destination with a multiplier effect (approximately $6 in local economic activity for every $1 in ticket sales) • Revitalizes a dormant corner and may help restore Santa Monica’s reputation as a performance destination
• Uses federal tax credits that, RPG says, are already preliminarily approved by the California State Historic Preservation Office
• Because its location is near seven major hotels, the Expo line (most important) and freeway access RPG says it needs a six-month extension to complete essential detailed cost estimates and financial feasibility studies. RPG says this additional time is necessary to structure a sound lease agreement and minimize downstream surprises in this complex, multimillion-dollar project. It sounds like a fairly modest amount of time for such a complex project.

This appears to be an opportunity to revitalize downtown and bring back the economic prosperity our city so critically needs. The council should not let this transformative project slip away because of an insufficient timeline.

Please extend the ENA agreement to allow RPG the time needed to properly validate this project for our city’s future.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 835 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 113
Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
Charlotte Wolter
927 18th Street, Apt. A
Santa Monica, California
90403
Home: 310-597-4040
Mobile: 310-663-3699
[email protected]
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 836 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 114
Mitchell Kois
From: MAURYA COLEMAN <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 12:37 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis
Subject: 11c - SUPPORT Extension of RPG term for Civic ENA

Please extend the ENA agreement to allow RPG the Ɵme needed to properly validate this project for our city’s future.

Thank you for your consideraƟon.

Sincerely,
Maurya Coleman
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 837 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 115
Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 12:32 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis
Subject: 11c - SUPPORT Extension of RPG term for Civic ENA

Please extend the ENA agreement to allow RPG the Ɵme needed to properly validate this project for our city’s future.

Thank you for your consideraƟon.

Sincerely,
Mary Nardoza
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 838 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 116
Mitchell Kois
From: janet heinle <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 11:36 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: 11c - SUPPORT Extension of RPG term for Civic ENA

RPG has presented an exciting and thoughtful design concept that preserves the Civic’s historic character while creating a modern, accessible 2,500-3,000 seat performance venue.

The plan maintains the building’s iconic exterior, includes essential seismic upgrades and full accessibility improvements, and adds complementary outdoor spaces and amenities.

This project offers tremendous benefits to Santa Monica: • Preserves our only building meeting all six landmarking criteria while returning it to its original purpose as a premier music venue • Provides significant economic impact through the cultural destination multiplier effect (approximately $6 in local economic activity for every $1 in ticket sales) • Revitalizes a dormant corner and helps restore Santa Monica’s reputation as a performance destination • Leverages federal tax credits already preliminarily approved by the California State Historic Preservation Office • Perfect location near seven major hotels, the Expo line, and freeway access RPG needs the six-month extension to complete essential detailed cost estimates and financial feasibility studies. This additional time is necessary to structure a sound lease agreement and minimize downstream surprises in this complex, multimilliondollar project. This is one of our last and biggest opportunities to revitalize downtown and bring back the economic prosperity our city so critically needs. We cannot afford to let this transformative project slip away due to an insufficient timeline. Please extend the ENA agreement to allow RPG the time needed to properly validate this project for our city’s future. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Janet Heinle Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 839 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 117
Mitchell Kois
From: Christie Savage <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 11:25 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis
Subject: 11c - SUPPORT Extension of RPG term for Civic ENA

EXTERNAL
Dear Santa Monica City Council Members,
I remember (as a teenager) the days that the Santa Monica Civic hosted the Academy Awards - it was beyond exciting. We used to drive by to see the limos arriving! I have followed with great interest RPG’s proposal to restore and expand the site and am writing to express my strong support for the restoration project led by Revitalization Partners Group (RPG) and to urge you to extend the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) by six months.

Please extend the ENA agreement to allow RPG the time needed to properly validate this project for our city’s future.

Thank you for your consideration.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 840 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 118
Sincerely,
Christie Savage
Sent from my iPad
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 841 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 119
Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 11:19 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis
Subject: 11c - SUPPORT Extension of RPG term for Civic ENA

Please extend the ENA agreement to allow RPG the Ɵme needed to properly validate this project for our city’s future.

Thank you for your consideraƟon.

Sincerely,
Suzanne Watson
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 842 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 120
Mitchell Kois
From: Lynette Kozdron <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 11:06 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis
Subject: 11c - SUPPORT Extension of RPG term for Civic ENA

Please extend the ENA agreement to allow RPG the time needed to properly validate this project for our city’s future.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
Lynette Kozdron
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 843 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 121
Mitchell Kois
From: Melissa Ward <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 10:53 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis
Subject: 11c - SUPPORT Extension of RPG term for Civic ENA

Please extend the ENA agreement to allow RPG the Ɵme needed to properly validate this project for our city’s future.

This civic center was the heart of Santa Monica for decades. Many years before I moved here I would come up to see concerts there from Orange County. Loving visiƟng Santa Monica led me to move here in 1984. I and everyone else were devastated when it closed down. Please move this project forward so that we may once again enjoy many different and varied events in this historic and wonderful civic center, and maybe, just maybe, it will steer Santa Monica towards a more civil union in our beloved Bay City.

Thank you for your consideraƟon.

Sincerely,
Melissa Ward
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 844 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 122
Mitchell Kois
From: Roberta Strait <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 10:49 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis
Subject: 11c - SUPPORT Extension of RPG term for Civic ENA

Please extend the ENA agreement to allow RPG the Ɵme needed to properly validate this project for our city’s future.

Thank you for your consideraƟon.

Sincerely,
[Your name]
Roberta Strait
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 845 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 123
Mitchell Kois
From: Santa Monica Forward <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 10:33 AM
To: Dan Hall; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; councilmtgitems; Ellis Raskin; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis
Cc: Carl Hansen; Bradley Ewing; [email protected] Subject: 11C: Terminate Exclusive Negotiation Agreement and Chart a New Course Attachments: 2025-10-11_ Terminate Civic ENA.pdf

EXTERNAL
Hello Council Members,
Please see the letter from Santa Monica Forward attached.

Brad Ewing and Carl Hansen
Co-Chairs, Santa Monica Forward
--
We are working for a diverse, progressive, sustainable and equitable Santa Monica.

SantaMonicaForward.org
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 846 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 11C: Terminate Exclusive Negotiation Agreement and Chart a New Course 2025-10-11
Mayor Negrete and Councilmembers,
We write to urge the City Council to terminate the Exclusive Negotiation Agreement (ENA) with Revitalization Partners Group (RPG) regarding the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium and so the city can pursue an alternative approach that maximizes the city's long-term financial interests and community needs.

Santa Monica faces a critical budget crisis. Against this backdrop, the decision regarding the Civic Auditorium is not merely about one building; it is a fundamental question about how the city will allocate scarce resources and capitalize on its most valuable assets.

The Civic Auditorium sits on prime real estate positioned at the gateway between downtown Santa Monica and the Main Street corridor. This land represents one of the city's most valuable untapped assets. The opportunity cost of committing this site to a financially unviable project while the city struggles to balance the budget cannot be justified.

RPG's Proposal: A Litany of Problems
The city's own staff analysis demonstrates conclusively that the RPG proposal is not viable without substantial public subsidy. In their staff report, city staff conducted an independent financial modeling exercise based on the verbal information RPG has provided and industry-standard assumptions. The results are stark.

Under RPG's most optimistic scenario (200 shows per year at 100 percent occupancy with a 30 percent operating margin) the project generates an unlevered internal rate of return of approximately 7 percent and remains $25 million underwater on a net present value basis.

Under a realistic base case scenario of 150 shows annually at 85 percent occupancy with a 20 percent operating margin, the project yields only a 3 percent unlevered IRR and remains $120 million in deficit.

As city staff concluded, "the project appears to perform well below industry benchmarks," and "the concept being advanced by RPG appears to be financially unviable without a significant subsidy or restructured scope."
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 847 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) Beyond the financial shortcomings, the ENA process has demonstrated troubling weaknesses that further undermine confidence in RPG.

The ENA began negotiations in July 2024 and was formally executed in April 2025, representing over a year of engagement. Despite this timeline, RPG has failed to deliver the financial documentation essential for informed decision-making. RPG has provided only verbal financial representations and preliminary design concepts. Most significantly, RPG has not provided a written pro forma, capital stack, or operating plan. City staff notes that "RPG has not provided staff with any financial or business plan demonstrating the feasibility of their proposed concept." RPG has requested repeated extensions of the ENA term. The initial six-month exclusive period was extended multiple times before the ENA was finally executed in April 2025. Now, with the six-month ENA term having expired on October 8, 2025, RPG is requesting yet another extension, this time for six months, to complete work that should have been done during the exclusivity period.

RPG has maintained an opaque approach to sharing planning materials. When the city's staff reviewed preliminary designs, they were instructed that the materials were confidential.

Subsequently, RPG released these designs to the public without clear coordination with the city and without the transparency that a public asset redevelopment should require.

Problems Inherent to the RPG Proposal Design
Beyond the financial analysis and process shortcomings, the design itself raises significant concerns about the city's long-term interests.

The proposal leaves pedestrian-unfriendly blank walls facing Main and Pico streets. This design choice actively undermines the city's investment in Main Street revitalization and represents a missed opportunity for street activation and economic vitality to connect the downtown and Main Street pedestrian corridors.

The proposal also limits the flexibility of the facility. The interior is designed narrowly as a theater and concert venue with little adaptability for other uses. Santa Monica's hospitality industry has consistently emphasized the scarcity of convention and meeting space in the city. No hospitality operators can offer truly significant ballroom or multi-use event space. The RPG design does not appear to address this community need and forecloses opportunities for revenue generation that could benefit the city and support the local economy.

Additionally, there are serious concerns about the business partners themselves. The Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice is currently investigating Live Nation and Ticketmaster.

Given these legal and regulatory clouds, entering into a long-term agreement with these entities presents additional risk to the city.

Finally, RPG's financial proposal is less generous to the city than initially presented. While emphasizing that they will not use city money on the project, RPG has requested to pay the city Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 848 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) only $1 per year in ground rent. This represents an extraordinarily favorable arrangement for RPG: they would gain control of a prime downtown asset worth tens of millions of dollars in exchange for minimal annual compensation. The company would absorb the primary benefits of the development while the city bears the opportunity cost of forgoing alternative uses of this land.

The Path Forward: Pursue Highest and Best Use of the
Site
We urge the City Council to take the following actions:

First, remove the landmark status of the Civic Auditorium. The landmark designation restricts the city's options and constrains the potential uses of the land. While historic preservation has value, that value should not prevent the city from pursuing options that serve the broader fiscal health and community interests. The Civic has been vacant for 12 years, in large part due to the landmark restriction foreclosing feasible uses of the land.

Second, terminate the ENA with RPG effective immediately. The repeated extensions, lack of financial documentation, and demonstrated economic infeasibility of the proposal are sufficient grounds for termination. The city has waited over a year with minimal progress toward a viable project.

Third, issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) with two distinct options. Option One should invite proposals for the rehabilitation and adaptive reuse of the existing Civic Auditorium building.

Option Two should invite proposals for a "blank slate" redevelopment scenario where the site can be redeveloped without constraints related to historic preservation.

This two-track RFP will accomplish several objectives. It will allow serious preservation-oriented developers to submit competing proposals for adaptive reuse. If RPG is genuinely committed to the project and confident in its feasibility, they can compete for the preservation track. However, the blank slate option will also allow the city to explore alternative uses that may generate substantially greater revenue and serve community needs more effectively.

Fourth, implement a land value capture strategy through ground lease arrangements rather than outright sale. The city should not sell this land. A ground lease preserves the city's ownership while generating ongoing revenue streams. The lease structure should be designed to capture a meaningful share of the project's revenues and success, ensuring that the public retains long-term value from this valuable public asset.

The revenue potential of this site can be vigorously investigated across multiple uses: a modern, flexible concert venue suitable for the 21st century; a convention center or meeting space that addresses the shortage of such facilities in Santa Monica; hotel development that capitalizes on the site's downtown location; or mixed-use development including housing that addresses the city's housing shortage.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 849 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) Importantly, enabling positive revenue generation on this site is an opportunity for the city to address the Civic's original sin. A portion of the revenue can fund ongoing reparations for the families forcibly displaced by the destruction of the Belmar neighborhood.

Conclusion
Santa Monica cannot afford to lock in a $360 million development that will require subsidy to operate and that will generate minimal, if any, ongoing revenue to the city. The Civic Auditorium site is too valuable, and the city's fiscal circumstances are too precarious, to accept an arrangement in which a private developer gains control of prime downtown real estate for $1 per year.

The Council has the opportunity to chart a different course. By terminating the ENA, removing the landmark constraint, and issuing a competitive RFP with both preservation and blank slate options, the city can unlock the genuine economic potential of this asset. This approach respects preservation interests while also ensuring that the city's fiscal health is not subordinated to any single developer's vision.

We urge you to act decisively on these four recommendations.

Brad Ewing and Carl Hansen
Co-Chairs, Santa Monica Forward
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 850 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 124
Mitchell Kois
From: Lesley Holden <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 10:30 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis
Subject: 11c - SUPPORT Extension of RPG term for Civic ENA

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 851 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 125
Mitchell Kois
From: barry engelman <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 10:26 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis
Subject: 11c - SUPPORT Extension of RPG term for Civic ENA

Please extend the ENA agreement to allow RPG the Ɵme needed to properly validate this project for our city’s future.

Thank you for your consideraƟon.

Sincerely,
Barry Engelman
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 852 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 126
Mitchell Kois
From: Elizabeth Lerer <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 10:19 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Dan Hall; Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: Item 11.C. Support for RPG and City to continue the process to revitalize the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and Councilmembers,
The Civic cultural center plan as envisioned by RPG would create a joyful and needed nexus for our city. I have never seen a proposed project that is as beauƟfully scaled and that feels as right as this one does.

Sad and discouraging that the majority of the current City Council lacks the personal lived experience of being longƟme residents of Santa Monica.

Do the right thing to show you care about and respect our community.

Please extend the ENA and conƟnue to negoƟate with RPG.

Thank you,
Elizabeth Lerer
Resident of 40+ years
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 853 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 127
Mitchell Kois
From: Darin Toohey <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 8:20 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Re: Santa Monica Civic Restoration

EXTERNAL
Dear City Council Members,
This message is to voice my support for restoraƟon of the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium and surrounding areas to presence and enhance this amazing venue and resource for your great city. Although I now live in Boulder, Colorado, I grew up in Southern California and I visited the venue oŌen as a music fan in the 1970s. It was a wonderful venue then, and it could be an even beƩer one in the future. As I watch my current town of Boulder struggle with housing, I understand the pressures to find affordable soluƟons. So I understand your burden. I do believe that historic venues like our Boulder Theater and the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium are important aƩractors that enhance the value of city centers, leading to long-term stability and growth.

Thank you for the opportunity to weigh in from afar, and best of luck with your decision.

Darin Toohey - formerly La Habra, CA, now Boulder, CO
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 854 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 128
Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2025 9:34 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: PLEASE SAVE THE CIVIC

EXTERNAL
Please, please, please support RPG’s vision for a restored Civic Auditorium and do everything in your power to make this happen. With all the negative going on in our community we desperately need this to build toward a better Santa Monica.

Sincerely,
Cathy Tryon
30 year resident of Santa Monica
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 855 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 129
Mitchell Kois
From: Susan Stangl <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2025 8:06 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: [email protected]; Oliver Chi
Subject: Support RPG and City to revitalize the Civic Auditorium (Item 11C)

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members and City Manager,
We have the opportunity to give our city a fully restored state-of-the-art Civic Auditorium at NO cost to us, the taxpayers. As a teen and young adult, I attended many concerts at the civic and my high school graduation from St. Monica's was held there. too. It would be a shame to waste this chance and lose out on a new music and arts center for our city. Going downtown or to Hollywood for all our entertainment is a pain and so many west-siders would love the chance to have a new facility that is also close to public transit. It would bring many locals and visitors to our city for meals and a drink after the concerts as well.

PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE continue negotiations with RPG in good faith and give us a chance at a wordclass facility in our city.

Thank you!
Susan Stangl
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 856 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 130
Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2025 7:15 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: Save Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Date: 10/11/25

To: [email protected]
cc: [email protected], info@savethecivi
c.org
RE: Support for RPG and City to continue the
process to revitalize the Civic Auditorium (Item
11C)

City Council and City Manager,
I urge you to continue the negotiations with RPG
so that our city can have a fully restored, state-ofthe-art, Civic Auditorium. Santa Monica deserves nothing less.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 857 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 131
Publicly owned venues for music and the arts are
rare and important and should not be sold off or
used for other purposes.

The fate of our historic Civic rests with you. RPG
has conducted due diligence and
prepared preliminary plans for an exciting worldclass performing arts center at NO cost to taxpayers.

I urge you to continue to negotiate in good faith
with RPG. Ending discussions now would be a
tragic missed opportunity and a huge loss for all of
us.

Thank you.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 858 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 132
Allen Nelson
534 21st Place
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 859 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 133
Mitchell Kois
From: Andrea H. <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2025 6:15 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: The SM Civic Auditorium - letter in support of keeping and revitalizing the SM Civic

EXTERNAL
October 11, 2025
RE: Support for RPG and City to continue the process to revitalize the Civic Auditorium (Item 11C)
Dear Mayor Negrete; City Manager Chi; and Councilmembers Caroline Torosis, Dan Hall, Ellis Raskin, Barry Snell, Natalya Zernitskaya, and Jesse Zwick, My name is Andrea Halperin. I am writing to you to request continuing the negotiations with RPG so that our city can have a fully restored, state-of-the-art, Civic Auditorium.

I grew up in Santa Monica in the 1970's and 1980's, and I attended wonderful concerts in the Santa Monica Civic, as well as participating in the wonderful Stairway of the Stars at the SM Civic through the SMMUSD music program where all the district elementary schools, middle schools, and Samohi participated together in choir, band, and orchestra. It was an unforgettable and incredible experience for all the students from all grades and ages throughout Santa Monica and Malibu.

And also going to great trade shows at the SM Civic too.

The SM Civic currently has a seating capacity of about 3,000. As a comparison, the Saban Theater has a capacity of only 2,000, and the Greek Theater has a capacity of about 5,900.

So obviously there is potential for substantial revenue.

People on the Westside as well as farther, will welcome attending concerts and events in Santa Monica, versus traveling to farther venues.

Publicly owned venues for music and the arts are rare and important and should not be sold off or used for other purposes.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 860 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 134
The fate of our historic Civic rests with you. RPG has conducted due diligence and prepared preliminary plans for an exciting world-class performing arts center at NO cost to taxpayers.

And by proposing a futuristic, exciting immersive experience, the Civic will attract a new generation of residents and worldwide visitors, producing new revenue for our businesses and enhancing our city’s destination status.

I urge you to continue to negotiate in good faith with RPG. Ending discussions now would be a tragic missed opportunity and a huge loss for all of us.

Many thanks,
Andrea
Andrea Halperin
12533 San Vicente Blvd.

Los Angeles CA 90049
310-295-8774
[email protected]
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 861 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 135
Mitchell Kois
From: Ellie Farbstein <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2025 5:45 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: SAVE THE CIVIC AUDITORIUM

EXTERNAL
October 14, 2025 Meeting
To: [email protected]
cc: [email protected], [email protected]
RE: Support for RPG and City to continue the process to revitalize the Civic Auditorium (Item 11C)
City Council and City Manager,
I urge you to continue the negotiations with RPG so that our city can have a fully restored, state-of-the-art, Civic Auditorium. Santa Monica deserves nothing less.

Publicly owned venues for music and the arts are rare and important and should not be sold off or used for other purposes.

The fate of our historic Civic rests with you. RPG has conducted due diligence and prepared preliminary plans for an exciting world-class performing arts center at NO cost to taxpayers.

And by proposing a futuristic, exciting immersive experience, the Civic will attract a new generation of residents and worldwide visitors, producing new revenue for our businesses and enhancing our city’s destination status.

I urge you to continue to negotiate in good faith with RPG. Ending discussions now would be a tragic missed opportunity and a huge loss for all of us.

Thank you.

ELLIE FARBSTEIN
40 year santa monica resident, homeowner, voter
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 862 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 136
Mitchell Kois
From: Jo Baxter <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2025 4:46 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: Save the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL

To: [email protected]
cc: [email protected], info@savethecivi
c.org
RE: Support for RPG and City to continue the
process to revitalize the Civic Auditorium (Item
11C)

City Council and City Manager,
I urge you to continue the negotiations with RPG
so that our city can have a fully restored, state-ofthe-art, Civic Auditorium. Santa Monica deserves nothing less.

Publicly owned venues for music and the arts are
rare and important and should not be sold off or
used for other purposes.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 863 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 137
The fate of our historic Civic rests with you. RPG
has conducted due diligence and
prepared preliminary plans for an exciting worldclass performing arts center at NO cost to taxpayers.

I urge you to continue to negotiate in good faith
with RPG. Ending discussions now would be a
tragic missed opportunity and a huge loss for all of
us.

Thank You,
Jo Baxter
Marguerita Avenue
Santa Monica 90402
Sent from my iPad
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 864 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 138
Mitchell Kois
From: Sherrill Kushner <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2025 4:39 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear City Council members:

You have been offered an amazing gift: restoring and revitalizing the historic Civic Auditorium and Santa Monica's adjacent downtown at no cost to the city or its residents! There is nothing to lose and everything to gain.

The Auditorium could be a big draw to the city which has lost opportunities like the Marathon and the Olympics. A 3,000- seat arts and music venue with close proximity to our hotels, restaurants and beaches creates a once-in-a-lifetime chance to put the city back the map in an area where potential was being neglected.

Give RPG the additional time it needs to make this a reality. It will be worth the investment of time.

Sincerely,
Sherrill Kushner
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 865 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 139
Mitchell Kois
From: Julie Pedone <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2025 4:25 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Civic

EXTERNAL
Hi
I’d like to express my support for the refurbished legendary civic center. As a SM naƟve band local resident, it is detrimental that we preserve what’s leŌ of our city.

Kindly
Julie Pedone
This message will self destruct.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 866 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 140
Mitchell Kois
From: Victor Fresco <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2025 3:16 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Cc: Oliver Chi
Subject: Item 11c Please Vote to Save and Restore the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmembers.

I urge you to grant RPG a 180-day extension so they can continue to do their due diligence on restoring the Civic Auditorium.

Santa Monicans have waited more than a decade for the Civic to be remade into a proper performing arts venue. Now, we finally have a serious, capable partner proposing an extraordinary plan—even adding a new park!

When the Civic reopens as a world-class venue where Santa Monicans can enjoy exciting cultural events, no one will think twice about amount of time the negotiations took to get it right.

We’re so close to something great. Let’s do everything we can to make it happen! Thank you!
Victor Fresco
514 Palisades Ave
Santa Monica
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 867 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 141
Mitchell Kois
From: Dan J. <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2025 3:08 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Agenda Item #11C. Supporting approval of 6-month extension to RPG.

EXTERNAL
Dear Members of City Council,
I strongly urge you to approve the six-month extension for RPG to continue their work on the proposal for revitalizing the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium and the surrounding Civic Center area.

For the past several months, RPG has been developing a comprehensive vision—one that seeks not just to restore an architectural landmark, but to reimagine the Civic Center as a vibrant cultural and community hub. Their effort has been thoughtful, detailed, and deeply engaged with the complexities of this historic site. Allowing a modest six-month extension will give them the time needed to crystalize this ambitious and carefully coordinated proposal into a clear, actionable plan.

This is more than an architectural project; it is an investment in Santa Monica’s future. Reviving the Civic Auditorium will bring new energy to our local economy, draw visitors and artists from across the region, and create a civic gathering place that celebrates our city’s rich cultural legacy. Restaurants, shops, and nearby neighborhoods will all benefit from the renewed vitality that a thriving performance and event space will bring.

A project of this scope and importance deserves the time needed to be done right. The additional six months requested is a small but critical step toward achieving a truly transformative result—one that will honor Santa Monica’s history while shaping its future.

I urge you to grant RPG the time they need to complete this extraordinary effort. The outcome will be a lasting gift to our entire community—an enduring place of art, culture, and civic pride.

Thank you for your thoughtful consideration and commitment to Santa Monica’s continued vitality.

Sincerely,
Daniel Jansenson
_______________________
Daniel Jansenson Architect
telephone: 310.451.5907
1424 4th St. 221
Santa Monica, CA 90401
www.danjansenson.com
www.linkedin.com/in/danieljansenson
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 868 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 142
Mitchell Kois
From: Ryan Morris <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2025 2:58 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Save SM Civic Auditorium!!

EXTERNAL
Dear City Council,
Thank you for your hard work and dedication to our city. I am writing to express my strong support for saving our beloved Civic Auditorium.

As a long-time resident of 4th and Ashland and the former owner of Flying Saucers Cafe (next to Vidiots), I have a deep appreciation for the Civic Auditorium. It has been a unique and legendary landmark for decades, and it would be a tragedy to lose such a quirky and awesome icon. Like many others, I have countless cherished memories within its walls.

Please do the right thing and ensure the preservation of this important community asset! Thank you,
Ryan MacLeod Morris
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 869 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 143
Mitchell Kois
From: Daniel Galamba <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2025 2:31 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: October 14, 2025 City Council Meeting Item 5-Support for RPG and City to continue the process to revitalize the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear City Council and City Manager,
I urge you to conƟnue the negoƟaƟons with RPG so that our city can have a fully restored, state-of-the-art, Civic Auditorium. Santa Monica deserves nothing less.

Publicly owned venues for music and the arts are rare and important and should not be sold off or used for other purposes.

The fate of our historic Civic rests with you. RPG has conducted due diligence and prepared preliminary plans for an exciƟng world-class performing arts center at NO cost to taxpayers.

I urge you to conƟnue to negoƟate in good faith with RPG. Ending discussions now would be a tragic missed opportunity and a huge loss for all of us.

Sincerely,
Dr Daniel Galamba
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 870 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 144
Mitchell Kois
From: Brent Cohen <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2025 1:37 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: Keep the Civic Alive

EXTERNAL
City Council and City Manager,
Please stay at the table with RPG. Santa Monica deserves a fully restored, state-of-the-art Civic Auditorium — not another abandoned promise.

Publicly owned venues for music and the arts are civic treasures. Once they’re gone, they’re gone. The Civic can again be a cultural anchor — restored, re-energized, and self-sustaining — without costing taxpayers a dime. RPG has already done the homework and drafted plans that reimagine the space as a world-class performing arts center and immersive experience.

Reviving the Civic isn’t just preservation — it’s economic strategy. It means new audiences, new business, and renewed civic pride. Ending negotiations now would waste that momentum and close the door on a rare opportunity.

Please keep negotiating in good faith. Let’s bring the Civic back to life.

Thank you,
- Brent & Wendy Cohen, 2254 Cloverfield Blvd. (40+ year residents and homeowners) To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
photo Brent Cohen
310-613-0204 | [email protected]
GMT +8
Santa Monica, CA
To help
protect your
privacy,
Micro so ft
Office
prevented
auto matic
download of
this picture
from the
Internet.

To help
protect your
privacy,
Micro so ft
Office
prevented
auto matic
download of
this picture
from the
Internet.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 871 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 145
Mitchell Kois
From: Samuel Tolkin <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2025 11:31 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: RPG Extension Request, Agenda Item 11C

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and Councilmembers,
As a former Planning Commissioner and architect residing in our City for over 50 years, I cannot stress or urge more forcefully the importance of allowing RPG to continue work on the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium restoration. We cannot afford to let this asset be lost both as the architectural icon it is or as the entertainment venue it was and most certainly can be again.

Don't let this opportunity slip away!
Samuel M. Tolkin
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 872 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 146
Mitchell Kois
From: Cindy Bendat <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2025 10:48 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Oliver Chi
Subject: Item 11C on the October 14th Council Agenda

EXTERNAL
Dear CIty Council members:

I could not be more excited about the possibility of renovating the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium, and I fully support the ENA extension requested by RPG so that they can continue to do their due diligence in making this happen.

There is not a better partner than RPG. The group behind it represents decades of experience in event management. Their plans are forward looking. Their vision is my vision. The entire area will be renovated, and at no cost to the City. This is a no-brainer.

It's also what residents want. And we've been waiting for a very long time.

I urge you to continue negotiations with RPG and to grant the 180 day ENA extension.

Thank you.

Cindy Bendat
35-year resident
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 873 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 147
Mitchell Kois
From: Peter Spelman <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2025 10:39 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: SM CIVIC: Please extend RPG for 6 months

EXTERNAL
Hello Council Members and Mr. Chi:

Please do not consider ending your negotiations with RPG. They have come up with a wonderful plan that meets so many of the City's needs, financially, culturally, physically. They are not requesting any funding from the City. It costs you/us nothing to do this and lets them come up with a more final, complete plan.

We are on the cusp of something great, something will last for decades and decades. Please continue the negotiations in good faith and allow the possibility that we will once again have a wonderful Santa Monica Civic Auditorium.

Thank you.

Peter Spelman
730 Marine Street
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 874 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 148
Mitchell Kois
From: Michael J <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2025 10:07 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Please Extend RPG’s Time to Advance the Santa Monica Civic Restoration

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and Councilmembers,
I urge you to approve the six-month extension for RPG to continue work on the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium restoration.

This is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to revive an architectural landmark and bring back a worldclass performance venue that will energize our local economy, support the arts, and honor Santa Monica’s cultural legacy.

Please allow RPG the additional six months they have requested to complete their work and bring this vital community project to fruition. This extension is a small step toward a truly transformative civic achievement.

I appreciate your thoughtful consideration.

Sincerely,
Michael Jolly
Santa Monica Resident
Sent from Gmail Mobile
Electronic Privacy Notice: This email and any attachments contain information that is, or may be covered by, electronic communications privacy laws and is confidential and proprietary. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that you are legally prohibited from retaining, using, copying, distributing, or otherwise disclosing this information in any manner. Instead, please reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then immediately delete it. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 875 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 149
Mitchell Kois
From: Diana Gordon <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2025 10:06 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis
Subject: 11c - SUPPORT Extension of RPG term for Civic ENA

Please extend the ENA agreement to allow RPG the Ɵme needed to properly validate this project for our city’s future.

Thank you for your consideraƟon.

Sincerely,
[Your name]
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 876 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 150
Mitchell Kois
From: Jeffrey Gordon <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2025 8:10 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi
Cc: SMCLC; [email protected]
Subject: Item 11C October 14, 2025 Council Agenda

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Council,
The revitalized Civic as proposed by RPG is one of the most exciƟng and posiƟve things for Santa Monica in a long Ɵme.

It is great for residents and our cultural life. For our hotels and restaurants and their employees who are suffering a great deal. We’d also keep the iconic Civic and public land would remain public land. And at no cost to SM. In fact, it will bring in a good deal of revenue.

I urge you to conƟnue our negoƟaƟons and grant them more Ɵme to complete the next step.

Jeff Gordon
Santa Monica Resident
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 877 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 151
Mitchell Kois
From: Carla Finnerman <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2025 6:39 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Save The Civic

EXTERNAL
10/11/2025

City Council and City Manager,
I urge you to continue the negotiations with RPG so that our city can have a fully restored, state-of-theart, Civic Auditorium. Santa Monica deserves nothing less.

Publicly owned venues for music and the arts are rare and important and should not be sold off or used for other purposes.

The fate of our historic Civic rests with you. RPG has conducted due diligence and prepared preliminary plans for an exciting world-class performing arts center at NO cost to taxpayers.

And by proposing a futuristic, exciting immersive experience, the Civic will attract a new generation of residents and worldwide visitors, producing new revenue for our businesses and enhancing our city’s destination status.

I urge you to continue to negotiate in good faith with RPG. Ending discussions now would be a tragic missed opportunity and a huge loss for all of us.

Thank you.

Carla Finnerman
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 878 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 152
Mitchell Kois
From: Patty Ferry <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2025 1:05 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Please save the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
I have just been made aware of the fact that the historic Santa Monica Civic Auditorium is in jeopardy of being demolished. I can’t believe this would even be considered. The Civic was important to me when I lived in Los Angeles in the seventies and eighties, and I’m sure it is just as important to many others. I saw some of my favorite artists in concert there and even catered a few of them when Pacific Presentations was a major concert promoter in California.

Please don’t allow yourselves to follow the cruel and short sided path of erasing important landmarks, especially the Santa Monica Civic, which means so much to the culture and history of Los Angeles and the City of Santa Monica.

Kind regards,
Patricia Ferry
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 879 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 153
Mitchell Kois
From: Jeanne Laurie <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2025 12:09 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis
Subject: 11c - SUPPORT Extension of RPG term for Civic ENA

Please extend the ENA agreement to allow RPG the time needed to properly validate this project for our city’s future.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 880 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 154
Jeanne Laurie
Sunset Park
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 881 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 155
Mitchell Kois
From: Robyn Latter <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 10:19 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Santa Monica Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Progress and development are a normal part of our society, but there are some things that should be preserved no maƩer what profit could be made by others. Santa Monica Civic Auditorium is one of those places.

From its architecture to its historical significance, to the memories of the ciƟzens of Santa Monica, and surrounding areas, it is a unique landmark that deserves preservaƟon.

Santa Monica has become an overbuilt and crumbling city in the past decade. Please vote to retain a piece of its heritage so that future generaƟons may fall in love with it like the rest of us have over the years. Santa Monica has many other areas developers can squeeze revenue from, please leave this liƩle bit untouched.

Thank you so much!
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 882 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 156
Mitchell Kois
From: Michael Lockitch <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 10:09 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
I just wanted to raise my voice in favor of the preservation of the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium. I have lived in Santa Monica for over 45 of the last 50 years and that place is of great personal and community significance to me. In addition to the many many special music events I have attended there, many other varied Shows and Exhibits, my Law School Graduation was held there!
We can't just keep building more buildings and parking lots here in beautiful Samo-bythe-Sea, we must fight to preseve that which is purely ours at the heart of the matter.

I pledge my support to any efforts to keep it from becoming extinct!! MICHAEL D. LOCKITCH, JD
855 Tenth Street
(310)452-7000
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 883 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 157
Mitchell Kois
From: Brian Kehew <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 10:05 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Santa Monica Civic return- please!

EXTERNAL
It's a venue of an INTERESTING SIZE - we don't have anything on the West Side that holds that many people with an upscale setting. We need this place to exist! It will benefit all the hotels and shops and restaurants of course, too!
Brian Kehew
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 884 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 158
Mitchell Kois
From: Nancy Lamell <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 9:02 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: City Council 10/14/2025 - Closed Session - Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear City Council Members,
I understand that the City Council is considering a request by Revitalization Partners Group (RPG) to extend the period of their Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) with the City to further develop the details of RPG's proposal to revitalize the Civic Auditorium as a world class performing arts venue.

I have reviewed a short video posted by RPG on the Save The Civic website and, while acknowledging that I know nothing about the conditions and procedures applicable to the ENA, nor what other matters the Council must take into consideration with respect to the Civic Auditorium, I would like to share my observations:

1. I am thrilled that an effort to revitalize the Civic as a performing arts venue is underway, and I would like the Council to continue to pursue those efforts.

2. I am inclined to support RPG's request for a 180 day extension of the ENA, since RPG is actively pursuing its plans to revitalize the Civic. I do not want to see that effort cut off. That said, if there are other parties waiting to develop and present alternative plans for the Civic, or if RPG can (and will) continue to develop their proposal even if there is a period of non-exclusive negotiating while others can also negotiate, that may be a viable alternative. I am not advocating allowing RPG to monopolize the field if there may be competing proposals. I just don't want to see the project dropped.

3. RPG's video raised some questions for me that I would like to see addressed in their plans (or the plans of any other potential bidder):

The video did not address parking at all, other than to say that current surface parking will be turned into a park. A concert venue that seats up to 3,000 people, not to mention performers and staff, needs parking. I hope there will be substantial underground parking. Yes, the Civic is close to the Metro station and some people will use public transportation, but a large portion of the audiences will drive, particularly for evening performances. (I like to use the train to go to downtown LA for matinee performances, but I don't use it at night because the trains run less frequently at the time performances get out, and too many unhoused people use the trains at night to get off the street.)
The RPG video mentioned "state of the art acoustics." This worries me. I want to ensure that the revitalized auditorium will have good NATURAL acoustics, as well as a state of the art sound system. The space needs natural acoustics for unamplified orchestra, band, and choir performances, and Stairway of the Stars, as well as a good amplified sound system for rock Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 885 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 159
concerts, musicals, and variety performances. I toured the JAMS auditorium when it was new, and the tour leader proudly told us that the auditorium was intentionally designed to be acoustically "dead" so that it could be manipulated electronically. That might be nice in theory, but in practice it is a disaster. It requires schools to invest more in sound enhancement (individual mics, batteries, area mics, etc.) and professional sound engineers, than they would if the stage had good natural acoustics. In one JAMS musical theater performance, a student's mic went out, and she obviously was singing as loud as she could but she could not be heard at all! At Santa Monica Symphony concerts, the sound is uneven around the hall, and much better in the stadium seats than in the orchestra, probably because the sound engineer is at the top of the stadium seats. And, at those concerts, since the sound is engineered for orchestra, the spoken introductions are mushy and hard to discern.

I believe that the six mid-century vertical design elements at the front of the Civic Auditorium have historic significance (and even landmark protection?). In renderings in the RPG video, it appeared that those elements are different - still there, but without the same unique design. Please ensure that those design elements are protected in any revitalization of the Civic Auditorium.

Thank you for taking the time to consider my observations.

Sincerely,
Nancy B. Lamell
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 886 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 160
Mitchell Kois
From: Gina Simas <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 6:03 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: Please Support of RPG’s vision for a restored Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
All,
As a resident of Santa Monica for over 20 years, I urge all of you to please support RPG’s vision for a restored Civic Auditorium. Our community both desires and needs this communal space that can lead us into the future. My family and friends would love to attend concerts in our own backyard, as opposed to having to trek to the Hollywood Bowl or the Greek. This will bring revenue, tourists and togetherness to our City, at a time when our City desperately needs it. Thank you for your time and attention on this matter.

Sincerely,
Gina
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 887 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 161
Mitchell Kois
From: Joan Gand <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 5:46 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Save the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Please don't allow it to be torn down - its such a great historic building and could be revamped to today's standards. Look at what other cities have done with their vintage theaters - successfully restoring them for the public to enjoy!
Joan
--
Joan Gand
PS Modcom Education Committee Chair
La Jolla Historical Society Board
The Gand Band, www.thegandband.com
Gand Concert Sound and Installations www.gand.com
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 888 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 162
Mitchell Kois
From: Margaret Bach <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 5:19 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: Civic Auditorium --a once in a civic-lifetime opportunity

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmembers and City Manager Chi,
There is good news, finally! The revitalization plan for the landmark Santa Monica Civic Auditorium.

I urge you to approve the next step -- continued negotiations with RPG, which -- it is our hope -- will lead to a revitalized Civic, a landmark and iconic public treasure -- at no cost to the city or taxpayers.

Yes -- we need some good news, and you have the power to deliver it.

Sincerely,
Margaret Bach
former Santa Monica Landmarks Commissioner and multi-decade resident of Santa Monica Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 889 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 163
Mitchell Kois
From: Suzanne England <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 4:55 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Santa Monica Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Hello,
I’m wriƟng to say how much I hope the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium is refurbished and kept open for people to enjoy into the future.

I’ve enjoyed shows here for years, and am actually shocked that anyone would want to remove such a historical place.

Keep the music alive in Santa Monica!!
This venue is an incredible asset to the community, bringing live music to the city. The refurbishment, at no cost to the city, is an economic mulƟplier for the area bringing jobs, visitors, tourism, and lots of retail and restaurant money as a result of their brilliant design and programming. The outdoor venue will be beauƟful as well, adding green and a friendly summer atmosphere.

Please don’t take the music away.

Sincerely,
Suzanne England
Los Angeles Resident
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 890 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 164
Mitchell Kois
From: David Schwartz <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 4:52 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: David Schwartz
Subject: Save the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
To the Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council, I’m writing to urge you — with all the passion and respect I can express — to save the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium.

For generations, the Civic wasn’t just a building — it was the beating heart of Santa Monica’s cultural life. It was the place where we gathered to hear music that defined eras, to see performances that shaped our youth, and to share in the kind of community that made this city so extraordinary. I still remember seeing legends like The Doors, Albert King, and Jethro Tull there — moments that remain etched in the memories of thousands of us who lived here.

This iconic venue has been silent for too long, but its bones still hold that magic. Across Los Angeles, we’ve seen what happens when great historic venues are restored: they bring art, community, and vitality back to life. The same can happen here. There are already committed artists, filmmakers, and local supporters who want to underwrite the restoration — people ready to give the Civic a new chapter as a cultural landmark for the next generation.

Please don’t let the Civic become another victim of short-sighted development. Tearing it down to build another faceless complex would erase a piece of Santa Monica’s soul — something that can never be replaced once it’s gone.

You have the power to protect a space that has meant so much to so many. Restore it, reimagine it, and reopen it as the gathering place it was always meant to be. Let the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium sing again.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 891 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 165
With deep respect and hope,
David Schwartz
Lifelong supporter of the arts
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 892 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 166
Mitchell Kois
From: Lisa Walmsley <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 4:25 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: SM Civic

EXTERNAL
PLEASE save The Santa Monica Civic Auditorium!!
This is our history! So many great concerts and events have been there my whole life! Santa Monica is now SO overcrowded, the last thing we need is more condos or apartments.

Please preserve this important site!!
Thank you!
Lisa Harrison
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 893 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 167
Mitchell Kois
From: D M <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 4:17 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Please give your consent to RPG for an extension of 6 months

EXTERNAL
Thank you City Council for recognizing all the hoops the RPG group has leapt through to make a successful presentation regarding the Santa Monica Civic.

I am excited about the design. I'm the one who reached out to architect Louis Naidorf 2 years ago and asked him to be on our guidance committee.

He enthusiastically said yes!
I'm also the one who began making signs and spreading the word about saving Chain Reaction with Jerry Rubin and others. It will be a crime if that sculpture is not highlighted in a special way. Besides wondering how everyone's going to park, I'm sure these items will be addressed if RPG is granted a 6 month extension to complete their renderings.

Thank you for reading my statement aloud at the city council meeting October 14th.

All the best,
Dian Andrews
Resident of Santa Monica for over 40 years.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 894 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 168
Mitchell Kois
From: Stephanie Tainsky <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 3:44 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: Save the Civic

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmembers:

I am totally confused about why you would even consider the possibility of ending your negotiations with RPG, particularly because they are not requesting funding from the city.

Please continue the negotiations in good faith and gift our city a state of the art Santa Monica Civic Auditorium.

Please do not damage this process.

Thanks,
Stephanie Tainsky
730 Marine Street
Stephanie Tainsky, LMFT
310-478-1330 (office)
310-804-2883 (cell)
[email protected]
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 895 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 169
Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 3:27 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: hi

EXTERNAL
save the Civic Auditorium according to the new plan. Mitchell Lachman 117Fraser Santa MMonica Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 896 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 170
Mitchell Kois
From: Doreen Ringer-Ross <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 3:08 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Santa Monica Civic

EXTERNAL
Please save the Santa Monica Civic and help it remain a venue. It was a shining jewel of Santa Monica. I saw many glorious shows there over the years. It’s a civic treasure that should be restored.

Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 897 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 171
Mitchell Kois
From: Karen Blechman <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 3:05 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi
Subject: RE: Support for RPG and City to continue the process to revitalize the Civic Auditorium – Item 5

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,
I have looked at RPG's splendid proposals for the Civic Auditorium and hope that you will support them. I believe that the Auditorium could be a tremendous asset for Santa Monica, providing world-class entertainment for residents and visitors alike, and contributing mightily to the city's coffers.

Please do your utmost to advance this project.

Thank you,
Karen Blechman
Santa Monica resident since 1979
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 898 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 172
Mitchell Kois
From: Nick Cross <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 2:50 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Save the Civic

EXTERNAL
Good evening
I felt compelled to write as I have many fond memories with family and friends, enjoying live music and entertainment over the years.

Understanding a decision is to be made on its fate I wanted to implore the council to consider the value that entertainment and the Civic precinct can bring once again with the right long term support.

It will require an agreement from the council to support, to being our communities together (particular during these decisive times. This could be one way to do so where it has the proposed long term backing and support of prominent industry figures.

Hoping my small message resonates and encourages a positive decision for our community.

Best,
Nick
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 899 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 173
Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 2:38 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick

EXTERNAL
10 Oct 25
To: [email protected]
cc: [email protected],
[email protected]
RE: Support for RPG and City to continue the
process to revitalize the Civic Auditorium – Item 5
City Council and City Manager,
I urge you to continue the negotiations with RPG
so that our city can have a fully restored, state-ofthe-art, Civic Auditorium. Santa Monica deserves nothing less.

Publicly owned venues for music and the arts are
rare and important and should not be sold off or
used for other purposes.

The fate of our historic Civic rests with you. RPG
has conducted due diligence and
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 900 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 174
prepared preliminary plans for an exciting worldclass performing arts center at NO cost to taxpayers.

I urge you to continue to negotiate in good faith
with RPG. Ending discussions now would be a
tragic missed opportunity and a huge loss for all of
us.

Thank you.

Susan Suntree, 1223 11th St, Santa Monica,
CA 90401
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 901 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 175
Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 2:28 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: ITEM 5 Santa Monica Civic

EXTERNAL
RE: Support for RPG and City to continue the process to revitalize the Civic Auditorium – Item 5

City Council and City Manager,
The Santa Monica Civic Auditorium was an icon of Santa Monica, and part of our fond shared legacy of those with deep ties to Santa Monica, a place with many happy memories. Tales of events from the Santa Monica Civic continue for decades upon decades. (I will always remember my first concert, with Jerry Garcia, of the Grateful dead at the "civic") I hope that it will be so again.

I urge you to continue the negotiations with RPG so that our city can have a fully restored, state-ofthe-art, Civic Auditorium. Santa Monica deserves nothing less.

Publicly owned venues for music and the arts are rare and important and should not be sold off or used for other purposes.

The fate of our historic Civic rests with you. RPG has conducted due diligence and prepared preliminary plans for an exciting world-class performing arts center at NO cost to taxpayers.

And by proposing a futuristic, exciting immersive experience, the Civic will attract a new generation of residents and worldwide visitors, producing new revenue for our businesses and enhancing our city’s destination status.

I urge you to continue to negotiate in good faith with RPG. Ending discussions now would be a tragic missed opportunity and a huge loss for all of us.

Thank you.

Wendy Lamm
212 16th St.

Santa Monica, CA 90402
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 902 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 176
Mitchell Kois
From: Mary <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 2:27 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis
Cc: [email protected]; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office Subject: Agenda item #5: Support for RPG and City to continue the process to revitalize the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear City Council and City Manager,
I urge you to continue the negotiations with RPG so that our city will have a fully restored, revitalized, state-of-the-art Civic Auditorium. RPG has provided a well thought out detailed preliminary plan to bring back this world-class performing arts center at NO COST to the City or taxpayers.

This revitalized Civic Auditorium venue will attract local community members, as well as visitors from across the state, nationally, as well as internationally. This will provide much needed revenue for our local businesses while enhancing Santa Monica’s destination status.

Vote Yes to support continuing this process with RPG.

With appreciation,
Mary Hubbell
Ocean Park
Sent from my iPad
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 903 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 177
Mitchell Kois
From: Dave Pearlman <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 2:20 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Civic

EXTERNAL
Please save the Santa Monica Civic!

Best Regards,
Dave
Pearlman Microphones
Canyon Country, CA
818 203 5007
www.pearlmanmicrophones.com
No trees were harmed in the creation of this message although a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 904 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 178
Mitchell Kois
From: Chrissi Durbin <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 2:16 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: SAVE CIVIC

EXTERNAL
Pleeze
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 905 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 179
Mitchell Kois
From: Mercy Baron <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 2:14 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Please Save the SM Civic!!

EXTERNAL
Please don't tear down another landmark! My whole youth is tied to this wonderful place. Don't give into the greed of developers! Some things are worth saving, this is one of them! Mercy Baron
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 906 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 180
Mitchell Kois
From: David Lappen <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 2:04 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: Support for RPG and City to continue the process to revitalize the Civic Auditorium – Item 5

Publicly owned venues for music and the arts are
rare and important and should not be sold off or
used for other purposes.

The fate of our historic Civic rests with you. RPG
has conducted due diligence and
prepared preliminary plans for an exciting worldclass performing arts center at NO cost to taxpayers.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 907 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 181
And by proposing a futuristic, exciting immersive
experience, the Civic will attract a new generation
of residents and worldwide visitors, producing new
revenue for our businesses and enhancing our
city’s destination status.

I urge you to continue to negotiate in good faith
with RPG. Ending discussions now would be a
tragic missed opportunity and a huge loss for all of
us.

Thank you.

David Lappen
625 19th Street
SM
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 908 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 182
Mitchell Kois
From: Tim Kittleson <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 2:01 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: Santa Monica Civic

EXTERNAL
City Council and City Manager,
At your meeting on November 14 I urge you to continue the negotiations with RPG so that our city can have a fully restored, state-of-the-art, Civic Auditorium. Santa Monica deserves nothing less.

Publicly owned venues for music and the arts are rare and important and should not be sold off or used for other purposes.

The fate of our historic Civic rests with you. RPG has conducted due diligence and prepared preliminary plans for an exciting world-class performing arts center at NO cost to taxpayers.

And by proposing a futuristic, exciting immersive experience, the Civic will attract a new generation of residents and worldwide visitors, producing new revenue for our businesses and enhancing our city’s destination status.

I urge you to continue to negotiate in good faith with RPG. Ending discussions now would be a tragic missed opportunity and a huge loss for all of us.

Thank you.

Tim Kittleson
1057 20th Street
Santa Monica CA 90403
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 909 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 183
Mitchell Kois
From: Anita <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 1:38 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Support for RPG and City to continue the process to revitalize the Civic Auditorium – Item 5

EXTERNAL
City Council and City Manager,
I urge you to continue the negotiations with RPG so that our city can have a fully restored, state-of-theart, Civic Auditorium. Santa Monica deserves nothing less.

Publicly owned venues for music and the arts are rare and important and should not be sold off or used for other purposes.

The fate of our historic Civic rests with you. RPG has conducted due diligence and prepared preliminary plans for an exciting world-class performing arts center at NO cost to taxpayers.

And by proposing a futuristic, exciting immersive experience, the Civic will attract a new generation of residents and worldwide visitors, producing new revenue for our businesses and enhancing our city’s destination status.

I urge you to continue to negotiate in good faith with RPG. Ending discussions now would be a tragic missed opportunity and a huge loss for all of us.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Anita Szafran
929 Idaho Ave, Apt 1, Santa Monica, 90403
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 910 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 184
Mitchell Kois
From: Donnie Graves <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 1:13 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Please Save SM Civic

EXTERNAL
Dear Santa Monica City Council,
Even though I was born aŌer the TAMI Show, I grew up on that video, believing that Santa Monica was the center of the wonderful world of music.

When I moved to California, from Atlanta to work for Michael Jackson (prior to Prince, SƟng, U2, Herbie Hancock and several other known musical arƟsts) I moved to Santa Monica, because of the Santa Monica Civic and the special place that is SM!
The last thing So Cal & Santa Monica need is another high rise Condo building…kindly hold onto and embrace the Civic Center, it should restored and reopened…I promise you all, it will put Santa Monica back on the music and entertainment map. Film, Television, Streaming, Specials…they’ll all return and none of you will have to leave “town” to see some of the best shows on earth.

We all know it’s a major jewel in the amazing crown that is Santa Monica…don’t let it be lost.

Donnie Graves
[email protected]
213/247-0298
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 911 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 185
Mitchell Kois
From: Ed Berghoff <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 12:48 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Saving The Santa Monica Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
To whom it concerns,
I grew up in Santa Monica and the Civic was the place all my friends and I would go to hear the best acts perform. I saw Cream, Bob Dylan, Hank Williams Jr. Journey, Tim Buckley and so many more there. I also personally performed there twice with my old band The Bozone, featuring your own reƟred city aƩorney, David Fairweather, at Hal Jepsen’s “A Sea For Yourself” screenings.

The Civic is an impressive and important Santa Monica landmark and must be saved for future generaƟons. As there’s already support and funds to update revive the venue, this should be a no brainer.

Santa Monica doesn’t need more condos, it needs its historical landmarks. It needs its architectural monuments.

Please save the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium!
Sincerely,
Ed Berghoff
Sent from my iPad
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 912 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 186
Mitchell Kois
From: Ruth Peeples <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 12:24 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Save the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Santa Monica City Council,
As a longtime resident of the Westside and someone who has seen and loved many, many concerts of all types at the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium, I am distressed beyond measure at reports that the iconic former venue will be demolished to make room for more condominiums. While I know Santa Monica is struggling with housing, this is not the time or the location to put housing. We strongly suggest the Council accept the offer of renovation from a consortium of musicians and others who don't want to see part of our history gone forever. PLEASE accept the offer to renovate and reopen the SMCA. It will bring life and, better yet, great music back to Santa Monica, generating a lot of revenue for the City.

Thank you for your consideration.

Best regards,
Ruth Peeples
310-922-0616
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 913 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 187
Mitchell Kois
From: Daniel Kohn <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 12:20 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Santa Monica Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
To Whom It May Concern:

During my entire time living in Los Angeles, whenever I went to Santa Monica, one of my favorite places to visit was the Civic Auditorium. I've attended a number of concerts there over the years, and while there, I can feel the history in the building. It's such an important landmark and part of music history. It needs to be treated as such. There's not much that ties the city to its glorious history, but this building is exactly that.

Please save the SMCA and keep the city's rich history alive.

Thank you for your consideration.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Kohn
E: [email protected]
IG: @thedanielkohn
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 914 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 188
Mitchell Kois
From: Brian <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 12:14 PM
To: councilmtgitems

EXTERNAL
The Santa Monica Civic Auditorium is such an ICONIC venue and well worth all efforts proposed in the video you shared..Let's hope that the City of Santa Monica can save and respect its past history and build for a forward future celebrating its truly special place on the planet!! Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 915 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 189
Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 12:04 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Convention centet

EXTERNAL
Please save this convention center for music
Sent from AOL on Android
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 916 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 190
Mitchell Kois
From: Ken Sharp <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 11:42 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Please save the Santa Monica Civic!

EXTERNAL
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 917 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 191
Mitchell Kois
From: Michael Des Barres <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 11:32 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Santa Monica Civic rock ‘n’ roll

EXTERNAL
When I first came to the United States in 1972 I was in a band called Silverhead. We were all 20/21 years old. Our first show was at the Santa Monica Civic. We were told that it was a rock ‘n’ roll Palace a must even more important than the whiskey a gogo. I have never forgoƩen that night, that show, that place. It’s Walls echo with the greatest rock ‘n’ roll music ever performed live. Thank you for reading. In other words, resurrect rock ‘n’ roll.

Michael Des Barres.

Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 918 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 192
Mitchell Kois
From: BRIAN RAY <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 11:27 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: The Santa Monica Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Hello,
I’m wriƟng to you today, not just as an avid fan of midsized music and arts venues, but as a person who was raised in the Pacific Palisades and took the number 9 bus to Santa Monica so I could go to exciƟng concerts at the great Santa Monica Civic.

I also write to you as a longƟme member of Paul McCartney‘s band, an avid fan of mid century architecture, as well as a SM property owner / local taxpayer with four rental units a few blocks south of the Civic on 4th Street.

Please do the right thing and revitalize this cultural and architectural landmark so that we can all be proud of our CITY for standing up for the arts and for architecture.

Please, please please do not bow to the pressure of developers who would just as soon destroy it and build 250 faceless condominiums there.

I’m very proud of the work I’ve done on the board of directors in Palm Springs California in order to save their historic Plaza Theatre in the middle of town. Our grand opening is a month away and we’re all thrilled for the public support.

It is projected to add $40 million/yr to the local economy there with hotels, restaurants businesses, and patronage.

We can do the same, only bigger in our fair city if we make the right choice.

Thank you for reading this,
Brian Ray
Paul McCartney band
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 919 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 193
Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 11:22 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: The Santa Monica Civic

EXTERNAL
You must keep the Santa Monica Civic alive!
It has been the locale of so many historic SoCal rock shows including the filming of the legendary TAMI show.

The history, the location, the architecture…they are what’s left of 20th Century Santa Monica.

David Leaf
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 920 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 194
Mitchell Kois
From: Jerry Archer <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 11:09 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: SAVE THE CIVIC

EXTERNAL
Save the CIVIC!!!
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 921 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 195
Mitchell Kois
From: JORDAN ELLIS <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2025 7:41 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: May 28, 2024 Agenda Item 4D

EXTERNAL
A restored, vibrant, PUBLIC Civic Auditorium serving as a venue for the performing, musical and visual arts. Such a Civic would make our City a cultural and arts destination for Santa Monicans, Southern Californians and beyond; a source of pride (and tax revenue!) for the people of our great City.

The Civic has ALWAYS been a place for the performing arts and music. Those pursuits are vital in building community and enhancing culture. Many Santa Monicans make their living in arts and entertainment. The City should respect that community and not eliminate what was, and could be again, a world-class center for music and the arts
Thanks,
Jordan Ellis
Sunset Park resident
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 922 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 196
Mitchell Kois
From: Ed Harker <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2025 2:52 PM
To: Lana Negrete
Cc: Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; councilmtgitems; Nia Tang; Oliver Chi; Jennifer Taylor
Subject: RPG plans, Tuesday, October 14th City Council Meeting

EXTERNAL
Dear Council,
Please move forward with RPG's plans (Revitalization Partners Group LLC) to seismically upgrade, restore, program, and operate our landmark Civic Auditorium as a performing arts and cultural center.

Give them the time they need; they've proven they're on the right path and doing a terrific job.

Thank you,
Ed Harker
SM resident since 1984
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 923 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 197
Mitchell Kois
From: janine autolitano <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2025 2:26 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: RE: Support for RPG and City to continue the process to revitalize the Civic Auditorium – Item 5

EXTERNAL
臵臶臸臹臺臻臷 虵芩芪芫芬芭芨虵虹虺虻虼虽虾虿臶臸臹臺臻臷臵 虵芨芩芪芫芬芭虵虺虻虼虽虾虿虹臶臸臹臺臻臷臵 虵芩芪芫芬芭芨虵虺虻虼虽虾虿虹臶臸臹臺臻臷臵 虵芨芩芪芫芬芭虵虺虻虼虽虾虿虹臵臶臸臹臺臻臷虵
City Council and City Manager,
I urge you to continue the negotiations with RPG so that our city can have a fully restored, state-of-the-art, Civic Auditorium.

Santa Monica deserves nothing less.

Publicly owned venues for music and the arts are rare and important and should not be sold off or used for other purposes.

The fate of our historic Civic rests with you. RPG has conducted due diligence and prepared preliminary plans for an exciting world-class performing arts center at NO cost to taxpayers.

And by proposing a futuristic, exciting immersive experience, the Civic will attract a new generation of residents and worldwide visitors, producing new revenue for our businesses and enhancing our city’s destination status.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 924 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 198
I urge you to continue to negotiate in good faith with RPG.

Ending discussions now would be a tragic missed opportunity and a huge loss for all of us.

Thank you.

Janine Autolitano
2425 3rd St
Santa Monica 90405
臵臶臸臹臺臻臷 虵芩芪芫芬芭芨虵虹虺虻虼虽虾虿臶臸臹臺臻臷臵 虵芨芩芪芫芬芭虵虺虻虼虽虾虿虹臶臸臹臺臻臷臵 虵芩芪芫芬芭芨虵虺虻虼虽虾虿虹臶臸臹臺臻臷臵 虵芨芩芪芫芬芭虵虺虻虼虽虾虿虹臵臶臸臹臺臻臷虵
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 925 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 199
Mitchell Kois
From: L. Barber & C. Yost <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2025 12:29 PM
To: [email protected]; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Nia Tang; Jennifer Taylor; Bea Nemlaha
Subject: Saving the Santa Monica Civic

EXTERNAL
October 9, 2025
To the Santa Monica City Council,
I would urge you to continue the work on saving the Santa Monica Civic auditorium.

First, it is a splendid and unique piece of architecture in a perfect location in the city’s Civic Center.

Next, with the multitude of events that are happening all over the greater Los Angeles area, be they lectures, theatre, music, etc., Santa Monica would value from having such an auditorium. And the RPG group has a wonderful vision of how to make the Civic and its surroundings a world-class venue.

Lastly, you have a well thought out plan from RPG to rehab the structure. There will be no public financing, there will be a new park and marketplace with an outdoor concert area. What a plus for the city.

I am a member of the Santa Monica Conservancy and the producer of the yearly production of ‘Save the Pier!’, the play that details how the citizens and eventually, the City Council saved the pier from being torn down.

Here is another opportunity for the City Council to create a ‘win’ for the City of Santa Monica, do not allow this piece of Santa Monica’s history and future to slip through your fingers.

Yours sincerely,
Carolyn Yost
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 926 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 200
Mitchell Kois
From: L. Barber & C. Yost <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2025 12:23 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Oliver Chi; Nia Tang; Jennifer Taylor; [email protected]; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; councilmtgitems Subject: Santa Monica Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
It is my understanding there is a proposal coming before the city council to renew the ENA by Revitalization Partners Group to assess, develop, and operate the Civic Auditorium. I support the renewing of that proposal.

The Santa Monica Civic Auditorium is not only a historic landmark it is also embedded in the hearts and minds of the residents who live in Santa Monica and the westside. Thousands of us remember attending concerts by The Kinks, Stevie Wonder, and David Bowie. I’ll never forget discovering Bruce Springsteen as the opening act for Dr. John and the Night Trippers. The Cvic Auditorium has enormous cultural cachet and it shouldn’t be cast aside. Great opportunity awaits.

As coordinator for Friends of Santa Monica Pier in the early 1970s, I see similarities in the opportunity that the Civic presents to be upgraded along the lines spelled out by the exciting plan offered by RPG. I truly hope the council will proceed along that line of action.

Be a part of this compelling vision for theCivic Auditorium as another stellar point in the excitement of Santa Monica.

Sincerely,
Larry Barber
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 927 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 201
Mitchell Kois
From: Michele Blair <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2025 11:47 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Please save the SMCivic

EXTERNAL
Dear Council,
As a longƟme Santa Monica resident, I support saving the Civic and RPG architects taking on the project.

Thank you,
Michèle Blair
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 928 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 202
Mitchell Kois
From: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2025 9:43 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Please do *not* save the Civic

EXTERNAL
At a time when Santa Monica has declared a state of fiscal distress, it seems unwise to pursue a plan to “save” the obsolete, unsafe, and architecturally insignificant Civic Auditorium. Such a plan will spend a lot of money to convert one white elephant into another.

The idea of converting the auditorium to serve as a sports venue for SaMoHi is a poor one. The conversion cannot possibly be the best use of this valuable plot of land, and is unlikely to bring a good result for SaMoHi while spending lots of money.

The auditorium, currently an attractive nuisance, should be razed and converted temporarily to parking, unless someone quickly comes forward with a better proposal that will yield a very high return to Santa Monica.

Mark Brown
Santa Monica resident
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 929 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 203
Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2025 9:03 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Support for RPG and City to continue the process to revitalize the Civic Auditorium – Item 5

EXTERNAL
City Council and City Manager,
I urge you to continue the negotiations with RPG so that our city can have a fully restored, state-of-the-art, Civic Auditorium. Santa Monica deserves nothing less.

Publicly owned venues for music and the arts are rare and important and should not be sold off or used for other purposes. The fate of our historic Civic rests with you. RPG has conducted due diligence and prepared preliminary plans for an exciting world-class performing arts center at NO cost to taxpayers. And by proposing a futuristic, exciting immersive experience, the Civic will attract a new generation of residents and worldwide visitors, producing new revenue for our businesses and enhancing our city’s destination status.

I urge you to continue to negotiate in good faith with RPG. Ending discussions now would be a tragic missed opportunity and a huge loss for all of us.

Thank you,
Kelly Hsiao
Resident of 90405
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 930 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 204
Mitchell Kois
From: Will von Bernuth <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2025 8:58 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Support for RPG and City to continue the process to revitalize the Civic Auditorium – Item 5

Publicly owned venues for music and the arts are rare and important and should not be sold off or used for other purposes.

The fate of our historic Civic rests with you. RPG has conducted due diligence and prepared preliminary plans for an exciting world-class performing arts center at NO cost to taxpayers.

And by proposing a futuristic, exciting immersive experience, the Civic will attract a new generation of residents and worldwide visitors, producing new revenue for our businesses and enhancing our city’s destination status.

I urge you to continue to negotiate in good faith with RPG. Ending discussions now would be a tragic missed opportunity and a huge loss for all of us.

Thank you.

Will von Bernuth
Santa Monica, 90405
_____________________________
Will von Bernuth
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 931 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 205
Mitchell Kois
From: Paul Plambeck <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2025 8:48 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Please Support Saving the Civic Center as a Pillar of Santa Monica’s Heritage

EXTERNAL
Dear Santa Monica City Council,
I am writing to express my strong support for saving and restoring the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium. The Civic is a historic cultural landmark and an essential part of Santa Monica’s identity. Preserving it is about more than a building—it reflects our city’s values, our artistic legacy, and our commitment to honoring the community that came before us.

Efforts to abandon or disregard historic sites—much like the ongoing debate around the future of Santa Monica Airport—risk stripping away our shared heritage. These places tell the story of how Santa Monica became the city it is today. Rather than erasing them, we should embrace thoughtful revitalization that gives them new purpose while preserving their history.

Protecting our cultural and historical assets will strengthen Santa Monica’s future. I urge the Council to extend negotiations with RPG, and to remain committed to keeping the Civic a vital part of our community.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
Paul Plambeck
1512 Pacific St., Santa Monica, CA
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 932 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 206
Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2025 7:27 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
Do the city a favor. Extend the contract and give any other support needed going forward to make this landmark reclamation a reality. It will benefit the city in so many ways for decades to come.

Laurel Schmidt and Durnford King
Ocean Park
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 933 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 207
Mitchell Kois
From: Nancy Gottesman <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2025 5:45 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: Save the Civic

Publicly owned venues for music and the arts are
rare and important and should not be sold off or
used for other purposes.

The fate of our historic Civic rests with you.

Nancy Gottesman
10 Ocean Park Blvd., unit 15
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 934 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 208
Mitchell Kois
From: Michele Cole <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2025 5:26 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: Item 5 October 14, 2025 Council Meeting Support for RPG and City to continue the process to revitalize the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Item 5
Revitalize Civic Auditorium
City Council and City Manager,
As a long time Santa Monica resident I urge you to continue negotiations with RPG to fully restore the Civic Auditorium. Help continue to make/keep Santa Monica a world class city.

Music and art events are unique and would bring publicity and tourism to the City.

I urge you to continue to negotiate in good faith with RPG.

Please save the Civic Auditorium.

Thank you
Michele Cole
Santa Monica
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 935 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 209
Mitchell Kois
From: Dannie Charney <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2025 1:04 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Natalya Zernitskaya
Cc: Oliver Chi; Info Save the Civic
Subject: ITEM 5 :Mtg 10/14/2025 SUPPORT for RPG and City to continue negotiations

EXTERNAL
Date: October 8,2025
RE: Support for RPG and City to continue the
process to revitalize the Civic Auditorium – Item 5

City Council and City Manager,
I urge you to continue the negotiations with RPG
so that our city can have a fully restored, state-ofthe-art, Civic Auditorium. Santa Monica deserves nothing less.

Publicly owned venues for music and the arts are
rare and important and should not be sold off or
used for other purposes.

The fate of our historic Civic rests with you. RPG
has conducted due diligence and
prepared preliminary plans for an exciting worldItem 11-C October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 936 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 210
class performing arts center at NO cost to
taxpayers.

I urge you to continue to negotiate in good faith
with RPG. Ending discussions now would be a
tragic missed opportunity and a huge loss for all of
us.

Thank you.

Danielle Charney
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 937 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 211
Mitchell Kois
From: MICHAEL TARBET <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2025 12:51 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Make the Civic a working concert venue

EXTERNAL
Don’’t wait. I want to go again before I’m gone
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 938 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 212
Mitchell Kois
From: Phyllis Chavez <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2025 12:25 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; Nia Tang; Jennifer Taylor
Subject: Save The Civic

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I strongly support continuing negotiations to save, reactivate the Civic! Santa Monicans strongly support this effort! I am one of them.

I support and want a restored, vibrant, exciting, PUBLIC Civic Auditorium. It will have zero cost to the taxpayers. It will bring in tax revenue.

Please decide on October 14, 2025 to move forward with RPG'S plans! We will continue to own the Civic and it will be a beautiful performing arts and cultural center again for our great city! Yes, go forward. Yes, save the Civic. Yes, it IS a good idea. Let's do it! Thank you,
Phyllis Chavez
Sunset Park
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 939 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 213
Mitchell Kois
From: Phyllis Chavez <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2025 12:22 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis
Cc: Oliver Chi; Nia Tang; Jennifer Taylor
Subject: Save The Civic

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I strongly support continuing negotiations to save, reactivate the Civic! Santa Monicans strongly support this effort! I am one of them.

I support and want a restored, vibrant, exciting, PUBLIC Civic Auditorium. It will have zero cost to the taxpayers. It will bring in tax revenue.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 940 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 214
Mitchell Kois
From: Phyllis Chavez <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2025 12:15 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Fw: Save The Civic

I support and want a restored, vibrant, exciting, PUBLIC Civic Auditorium. It will have zero cost to the taxpayers. It will bring in tax revenue.

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 941 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 215
On October 14, 2025, our City Council will decide whether to move forward with RPG's plans (Revitalization Partners Group LLC) to seismically upgrade, restore, program, and operate our landmark Civic Auditorium as a performing arts and cultural center. Santa Monica residents will continue to own the Civic. RPG will not ask the City for any funds. RPG is a consortium of Make Good Group, Irving Azoff, Oak View Group, and Live Nation.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 942 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 216
Mitchell Kois
From: Jeff <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2025 12:07 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: oliver.chi@santamonicagov; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Council Agenda Item 5. October 14, 2025

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Council,
The revitalized Civic as proposed by RPG is one of the most exciƟng and posiƟve things for Santa Monica in a long Ɵme.

It is great for residents and our cultural life. For our hotels and restaurants and their employees who are suffering a great deal. And at no cost to SM. In fact, it will bring in a good deal of revenue.

I urge you to conƟnue our negoƟaƟons and grant them the Ɵme to complete the next step.

Jeff Gordon
Santa Monica Resident
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 943 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 217
Mitchell Kois
From: Kate Flather <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2025 11:55 AM
To: [email protected]; councilmtgitems; [email protected]; Oliver Chi; Nia Tang; Jennifer Taylor
Subject: In support of the City moving forward with the process of revitalizing the Civic Auditorium with RPG

EXTERNAL
Dear City Council and Manager,
In advance of next week's meeting, I am writing in support of the City of Santa Monica continuing the discussions and negotiations with RPG towards a fully restored, state-of-the-art, FUNCTIONING Civic Auditorium.

This was such an incredible cultural resource when I first moved to the Ocean Park neighborhood over 31 years ago. I remember seeing so much great live music there in the '90s, as well as attending the rad' CA-BOOM architectural expo' in 2006. It has been greatly missed since shuttering. That is was - and is - walkable from so many Santa Monica neighborhoods is pretty special. And now of course, the train basically comes right to it as well.

I have reviewed RPG's plans. They seem considered, creative, respectful of the surrounding area as well as the building's history, and architecturally tasteful.
(One suggestion: bring back that analog-dot sign.)
Everybody I know here is in favor of this.

Thank you for all the work on our collective behalf.

Sincerely,
Kate Flather
3002 3rd Street
Unit 312
Santa Monica
90405
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 944 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 218
Mitchell Kois
From: Richard Orton <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2025 11:09 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Oct 14 Meeting about Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Council,
I understand you are going to review the progress for updating the Civic Auditorium on Tuesday October

14. If an extension is needed please grant it to save this iconic local treasure. I've seen the plans and they look great, a real money maker for the community.

Thanks,
Richard Orton
Ocean Park
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 945 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 219
Mitchell Kois
From: Eden Kusmiersky <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2025 10:36 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: Support for RPG and City to continue the process to revitalize the Civic Auditorium – Item 5

EXTERNAL
Dear City Council and City Manager,
I urge you to continue the negotiations with RPG so that our city can have a fully restored, state-of-theart, Civic Auditorium. Santa Monica deserves nothing less.

Publicly owned venues for music and the arts are rare and important and should not be sold off or used for other purposes.

The fate of our historic Civic rests with you. RPG has conducted due diligence and prepared preliminary plans for an exciting world-class performing arts center at NO cost to taxpayers.

And by proposing a futuristic, exciting immersive experience, the Civic will attract a new generation of residents and worldwide visitors, producing new revenue for our businesses and enhancing our city’s destination status.

I urge you to continue to negotiate in good faith with RPG. Ending discussions now would be a tragic missed opportunity and a huge loss for all of us.

Thank you,
Eden Kusmiersky
1321 Pine Street
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 946 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 220
Mitchell Kois
From: Stacey Ravel Abarbanel <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2025 10:25 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; Amber Richane; Elaine Polachek Subject: Revitalized SM Civic, WOW!

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and Council Members::

I’ve just seen the RPG video on their plans for a revitalized Santa Monica Civic Auditorium and I am thrilled at the prospect of a vital civic center venue and public park, too! This seems like precisely the kind of investment we need for downtown, and I commend all involved parties on bringing this idea to this point. And to think that all of this could happen within a half mile walk from the E line station, so that able folks could walk to a concert from public transportation?! Amazing.

I hope you will commit to whatever RPG needs to make this exciting opportunity a reality.

Thank you,
Stacey Ravel Abarbanel
1039 Harvard Stree
[email protected]
310/736-5300
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 947 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 221
Mitchell Kois
From: JL H <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2025 10:11 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Support for RPG and City to continue the process to revitalize the Civic Auditorium – Item 5

Publicly owned venues for music and the arts are rare and important and should not be sold off or used for other purposes.

The fate of our historic Civic rests with you. RPG has conducted due diligence and prepared preliminary plans for an exciting world-class performing arts center at NO cost to taxpayers.

And by proposing a futuristic, exciting immersive experience, the Civic will attract a new generation of residents and worldwide visitors, producing new revenue for our businesses and enhancing our city’s destination status.

I urge you to continue to negotiate in good faith with RPG. Ending discussions now would be a tragic missed opportunity and a huge loss for all of us.

Thank you.

Jennifer Happillon
1721 Carlyle Avenue
Santa Monica, Ava 90402
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 948 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 222
Mitchell Kois
From: Mark Ford <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2025 9:55 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: Support for RPG and City to continue the process to revitalize the Civic Auditorium – Item 5

EXTERNAL
City Council and City Manager,
I urge you to continue the negotiations with RPG so that our city can have a fully restored, state-ofthe-art, Civic Auditorium. Santa Monica deserves nothing less. As the parents of a 2 year old in Ocean Park, we value a vibrant local cultural life and this will help reinvigorate the arts in Santa Monica and bring tourists and funds to our community.

Publicly owned venues for music and the arts are rare and important and should not be sold off or used for other purposes.

The fate of our historic Civic rests with you. RPG has conducted due diligence and prepared preliminary plans for an exciting world-class performing arts center at NO cost to taxpayers.

And by proposing a futuristic, exciting immersive experience, the Civic will attract a new generation of residents and worldwide visitors, producing new revenue for our businesses and enhancing our city’s destination status.

I urge you to continue to negotiate in good faith with RPG. Ending discussions now would be a tragic missed opportunity and a huge loss for all of us.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 949 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 223
Thank you.

Mark Ford and Reid Thompson
2623 3rd st Santa Monica 90405
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 950 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 224
Mitchell Kois
From: Alan Levenson <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2025 9:53 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 5 - civic center redevelopment group

EXTERNAL
Please extend Ɵme for the civic center redevelopment group.

Thank you.

Alan Levenson
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 951 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 1 Mitchell Kois
From: Christy Hobart <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 10:41 AM
To: [email protected]; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; councilmtgitems Cc: Oliver Chi; Nia Tang; Jennifer Taylor
Subject: October 14, 2025 Council Meeting - Item 11.C. - Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and Councilmembers -
Please approve a 6-month extension of the ENA with RPG, and ask RPG to return with a fully-developed proposal and financing plan at the end of that period.

Thank you for understanding that this is a ONE-TIME-ONLY opportunity now for our City and that the community continues to value deeply having a Civic Center with the Auditorium as its centerpiece.

Sincerely,
Christy Hobart
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 952 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 2 Mitchell Kois
From: Anne Saldo <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 10:39 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Honorable Councilmembers,
I am writing to express my support for the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium restoration project led by Revitalization Partners Group (RPG) and to urge you to extend the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) by 6 months.

This project offers tremendous benefits to Santa Monica. This is a rare opportunity to revitalize downtown, help restore Santa Monica’s reputation as a performance destination, and bring back the economic prosperity our city needs.

Sincerely,
Anne & Gerald Saldo
1004 Wilson Pl
SM CA 90405
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 953 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 3 Mitchell Kois
From: Schlosstein, Lynne <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 8:10 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely,
Lynne Schlosstein
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 954 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 4 Mitchell Kois
From: mmoody <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 10:35 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Caroline Torosis; Ellis Raskin Subject: RPG Extension

EXTERNAL
I am in favor of extending the ENA agreement with RPG.

Sally Hibbard
Santa Monica resident
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 955 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 5 Mitchell Kois
From: Diane Fresco <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 10:23 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Tonight's session - Continue RPG negotiations please!

EXTERNAL
Dear Mr Chi and City County members:

Please continue negotiations with RPG for a restored Santa Monica Civic. My family and I would love to attend events in our hometown at the envisioned new complex. I think it's a net plus for the city.

Please let negotiations continue!
Thanks so much for your consideration.

Diane Fresco
514 Palisades Avenue
Santa Monica 90402
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 956 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 6 Mitchell Kois
From: lmarreola <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 10:23 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete
Subject: Oct. 14 Item 11.C- Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmembers,
Please approve a 6 month extension of ENA with RPG to return with a fully developed proposal and financing plan at the end of that period. Great cities gave Civic Auditoriums.

Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S21 5G, an AT&T 5G smartphone Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 957 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 7 Mitchell Kois
From: Joanna Baker <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 10:19 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Please Vote to Restore the Civic

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members:

I am writing to express my strong support for the work and negotiations that are currently underway with RPG to restore and revitalize the Civic Auditorium!
Both of my children (ages 12 and 16) are lovers of theatre, music, and all performing arts. They are able to take part in world famous arts programs through their Santa Monica schools which I am so thankful for.

It is only fitting that our city should also have a world class arts and entertainment venue like the proposed revitalized Civic. It would be an amazing asset to our city and to the future performers and artists of Santa Monica.

I hope you will support continuing the negotiations with RPG.

Thank you,
Joanna Baker
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 958 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 8 Mitchell Kois
From: lmarreola <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 10:15 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete
Subject: 10-14 Item 11.C Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S21 5G, an AT&T 5G smartphone Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 959 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 9 Mitchell Kois
From: Victor Fresco <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 10:03 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: Item 11C: Support RPG's request for 60-day extension to revitalize the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
What will be your legacy?
What is the legacy of the Council members who came before you—those who voted to demolish the Pier and replace it with a floating resort, a decision that was overturned when residents rose up to say “no”.

Do we remember that Council for anything other than that calamitous vote? Tonight, it is your turn to decide your legacy. Like the Pier before it, our Civic Auditorium is in disrepair. And like the Pier, we have an opportunity to restore it, and turn it into a thriving, historic centerpiece of our community that will place Santa Monica at the cultural forefront of Los Angeles and beyond.

Tonight is our chance to do something great. How will future generations judge us if we fail? Victor Fresco
Santa Monica
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 960 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 10 Mitchell Kois
From: Mica Nafshun-Bone <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 10:02 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Cc: Oliver Chi
Subject: City Council10/14 Item11-C-SUPPORT 6-monthextension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
I am in support of the 6 month extension.

It would be great to have a music venue in Santa Monica Mica Nafshun-Bone
Santa Monica resident
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 961 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 11 Mitchell Kois
From: Lori Nafshun <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 9:50 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Cc: Oliver Chi
Subject: Support for RPG and City to continue the process to revitalize the Civic Auditorium (Item 11C)

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and Honorable Council Members:

I support the concept of both RPG and The City of Santa Monica using fact based data to determine if the rehabilitation of the Civic is a project that can be realized.

Why would we not give this important project the time needed to know for certain? A Revitalized Civic:
• Will Require No Public Funding
• Will Maintain Public Ownership
• Will Respect the Historic Architecture
• Will Be Rehabbed & Operated by Successful Experienced Professions • Will Be Rehabbed & Operated by Successful Experienced Professions Who Are Well Funded • Will Have State of the Art Audio and Visual Technology
• Will Give Us a Venue that Takes Less than 2 Hours to Travel to on a Weeknight • Will Bring Live Music Back to Santa Monica
• Will Become an Economic Driver for Shops, Restaurants, The Pier , DTSM, Main Street • Will Increase Tax Revenue for the City of Santa Monica The Consequences of a Six Month Extension:
• We will all be six months older
• Property Taxes will be due again
Let’e give this tremendous project the gift of time.

Thank you for your time.

Lori Nafshun
Santa Monia Resident
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 962 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 12 Mitchell Kois
From: Bea Nemlaha <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 9:49 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Cc: Oliver Chi; Nia Tang
Subject: 10/14/25 Council Agenda Item 11C

EXTERNAL
Council Members,
I write in support of RPG’s request for a 6 month extension of time to refine and present its design and financial plans for our Civic Auditorium’s rebirth as a 21st century performing arts center, one which will give young generations new memories that make Santa Monica again a cherished city.

Santa Monica currently has no true civic center. A city without a civic center is nothing more than just another suburb of Los Angeles with no distinctive character of its own. You have the power to fix this by granting RPG time to continue its work.

The Civic Center envisioned in Santa Monica’s 2005 City Master Plan was anchored by the Civic Auditorium. RPG’s proposal to preserve and restore this mid-20th century landmark and to program and operate it as a 21st century performing arts center will give Santa Monica residents a civic center they deserve, one which will once again re-new Santa Monica’s fading reputation as a desired destination for visitors from near and far, a civic center which will be an economic driver for the city.

Surely 6 more short months to continue discussing with RPG a plan to restore and operate a civic center at no cost to the city or its taxpayers is worth the city’s time. Anything less would be a betrayal of the Council’s obligation to Santa Monica’s residents to bring back the spirit of the city we all chose to be our home.

Bea Nemlaha
Ocean Park
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 963 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 13 Mitchell Kois
From: Susanne Jacobson <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 9:39 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely,
Susanne Jacobson
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 964 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 14 Mitchell Kois
From: Craig A Horowitz <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 9:37 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely,
Craig Horowitz
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 965 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 15 Mitchell Kois
From: Alex Maddalosso <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 9:28 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely,
Alex Maddalosso
[email protected]
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 966 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 16 Mitchell Kois
From: Katy MacLeod <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 9:22 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Support for RPG and City to continue the process to revitalize the Civic Auditorium (Item 11C)

Publicly owned venues for music and the arts are rare and important and should not be sold off or used for other purposes.

The fate of our historic Civic rests with you. RPG has conducted due diligence and prepared preliminary plans for an exciting world-class performing arts center at NO cost to taxpayers.

And by proposing a futuristic, exciting immersive experience, the Civic will attract a new generation of residents and worldwide visitors, producing new revenue for our businesses and enhancing our city’s destination status.

I urge you to continue to negotiate in good faith with RPG. Ending discussions now would be a tragic missed opportunity and a huge loss for all of us.

Thank you.

Katy MacLeod
465 21st Pl, Santa Monica
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 967 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 17 Mitchell Kois
From: J. D. <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 9:19 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: Item 11C: Support for RPG and City to continue the process to revitalize the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear City Council and City Manager,
I urge you to continue the negotiations with RPG so that our City can have a fully restored, state-of-theart, Civic Auditorium.

Thank you.

John Dahl
SM Citizen/Resident
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 968 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 18 Mitchell Kois
From: Clerk Mailbox
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 9:18 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: FW: Yes on Extending the ENA with RPG (Item 11C) Mitchell Kois
Staff Assistant III | City Clerk’s Office
(310) 458-8211 x5518
From: Susan Jain <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 9:11 AM
To: Lana Negrete <[email protected]>; Dan Hall <[email protected]>; Caroline Torosis <[email protected]>; Natalya Zernitskaya <[email protected]>; Ellis Raskin <[email protected]>; Barry Snell <[email protected]>; Jesse Zwick <[email protected]>; Council Mailbox <[email protected]>; Clerk Mailbox <[email protected]>
Subject: re: Yes on Extending the ENA with RPG (Item 11C)

EXTERNAL
Good morning, Esteemed Council Members,
This morning, I write to encourage you to vote to extend the ENA period with RPG for an additional 180 days. Given the building's design, history, and location, and RPG's extensive professional, personal assets, and stated goal to make the renovation and reopening a $0 outlay for the City, let's give RPG some more time.

I thought Marc L. Verville, Former Audit Subcommittee Chair, Sunset Park, did a great job outlining the reasons for such an extension in the Opinion piece published in today's Santa Monica Mirror.

The Civic Auditorium is a bold symbol of Santa Monica's historic support for arts and culture. Let's allow that storied space to gather people, uplift our spirits, and stimulate our financial and cultural economies. Over these past few years, we've been through a lot. Let the Civic become our Phoenix soaring up from the ashes to take flight anew.

Best regards,
Susan
Susan Pertel Jain, PhD,
Chair,
Santa Monica Arts Commission
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 969 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 19 Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 970 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 20 Mitchell Kois
From: Judith Meister <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 9:14 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: RE: Item 11C Approval to extend ENA with RPG for six-months

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
Please extend the original Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) with RPG for six months to allow completion of the financial analysis and negotiations for the restoration of the landmark Santa Monica Civic Auditorium. The proposed state-of-the-art facility will be an important asset for the City’s performing arts, culture, finances, and reputation.

Your support of this request is greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,
Judith Meister
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 971 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 21 Mitchell Kois
From: Deborah Roetman <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 9:13 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: SAVE THE CIVIC!

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,
Please vote to extend the RPG contract to revitalize the SM Civic! Deborah Roetman
Santa Monica Resident
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 972 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 22 Mitchell Kois
From: Jerry Rubin <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 9:07 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: [email protected]; Ellis Raskin; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall
Subject: Santa Monica Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
걡걢걣虶虷虸Dear Council Members:

I know you can be counted on to grant RPG the 6 months Ɵme they need to further develop a plan that will save and revitalize our cherished Santa Monica Civic Auditorium.

Onward! TOGETHER! EnthusiasƟcally!
Jerry Rubin
310-399-1000
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 973 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 23 Mitchell Kois
From: Faustino Garza <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 9:06 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely,
Jeanne Eisenman
1351 Pacific Street
Santa Monica
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 974 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 24 Mitchell Kois
From: Jennifer Kashdan <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 9:04 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; councilmtgitems
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

This project offers tremendous benefits to Santa Monica:
• Preserves our only building meeting all 6 landmarking criteria while returning it to its original purpose as a premier music venue
• Provides significant economic impact through the cultural destination multiplier effect ($6 for every $1 in ticket sales)
• Revitalizes a dormant corner near 7 major hotels, the Expo line, and the freeway • Leverages federal tax credits already preliminarily approved by the California State Historic Preservation Office RPG needs the 6-month extension to complete essential detailed cost estimates and financial feasibility studies.

This is a rare opportunity to revitalize downtown, help restore Santa Monica’s reputation as a performance destination, and bring back the economic prosperity our city needs.

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Thank you,
--
Jennifer Kashdan
90403
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 975 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 25 Mitchell Kois
From: Faustino Garza <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 9:04 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely,
Faustino Garza
1351 Pacific Street
Santa Monica
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 976 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 26 Mitchell Kois
From: elizabeth ostrom <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 9:01 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: RE: Support for RPG and City to continue the process to revitalize the Civic Auditorium (Item 11C)

EXTERNAL
City Council and City Manager,
I implore you all to think about those of us who are Santa Monica residents: both longterm and those who are recent transplants. WE ARE HERE because we value community. We know our neighbors, we buy from locally owned shops, we VALUE our history and the idea that the future can be BRIGHTER with good decision making... I ask you to make a GREAT decision today. Please continue the negotiations with RPG so that our city can have a fully restored, state-of-the-art, Civic Auditorium. Santa Monica deserves to keep this historical, community space while bringing it into the modern times.

Publicly owned venues for music and the arts are rare and important and should not be sold off or used for other purposes.

The fate of our historic Civic rests with YOU. RPG has conducted due diligence and prepared preliminary plans for an exciting world-class performing arts center at NO cost to taxpayers.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 977 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 27 And by proposing a futuristic, exciting immersive experience, the Civic will attract a new generation of residents and worldwide visitors, producing new revenue for our businesses and enhancing our city’s destination status.

I urge you to continue to negotiate in good faith with RPG. Ending discussions now would be a tragic missed opportunity and a huge loss for all of us.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Elizabeth Ostrom, 32 year resident of Santa Monica (initially a renter, now a homeowner) Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 978 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 28 Mitchell Kois
From: Andrew Wilder <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 8:52 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: Item 11C - SUPPORT for RPG and City to continue the process to revitalize the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear City Council and City Manager,
I urge you to continue the negotiations with RPG so that our city can have a fully restored, stateof-the-art, Civic Auditorium. Santa Monica deserves nothing less.

Publicly owned venues for music and the arts are rare and important and should not be sold off or used for other purposes.

The fate of our historic Civic rests with you. RPG has conducted due diligence and prepared preliminary plans for an exciting, world-class performing arts center at NO cost to taxpayers.

And by proposing a futuristic, exciting immersive experience, the Civic will attract a new generation of residents and worldwide visitors, producing new revenue for our businesses and enhancing our city’s destination status.

I urge you to continue to negotiate in good faith with RPG. Ending discussions now would be a tragic missed opportunity and a huge loss for all of us.

Thank you.

Andrew
Sunset Park
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 979 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 29 Mitchell Kois
From: lori brown <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 8:48 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: SUPPORT Agenda Item 11-C – (1/14/25) Extension needed for Civic ENA

EXTERNAL
My family and I request that this City Council extend the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) for the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium restoration project as requested by Revitalization Partners Group (RPG).

Extending the ENA agreement by 6 months will allow RPG the time needed to complete essential detailed cost estimates and financial feasibility studies. This additional time has been requested to structure a sound lease agreement and minimize downstream surprises in this complex, multimilliondollar project.

The following are impressive and important aspects to the proposal:

RPG commits that their proposal will require no City money or bonds, but to financing the project on its own.

RPG has presented a plan that preserves the Civic’s historic character while creating a modern, accessible 2,500-3,000 seat performance venue. The plan maintains the building’s iconic exterior, includes essential seismic upgrades and full accessibility improvements, adding complementary outdoor spaces and amenities.

A new park is planned on the site of the existing parking lot, adding green open space.

The project leverages federal tax credits already preliminarily approved by the California State Historic Preservation Office
The City’s existing downtown parking facilities will meet the demand created by events at the Civic, which is located near major hotels, the Expo line, and has freeway access.

Vote to extend!!!!
thank you
Lori Brown
Resident
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 980 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 30 Mitchell Kois
From: jane wiedlea <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 8:32 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Save the Santa Monica Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Please retain the Santa Monica Auditorium and bring it up to date with modern methods of presentation. The building is a part of our history and design worthy of saving. However, it does need updating for the modern world.

Sincerely,
Jane Wiedlea Koehler
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 981 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 31 Mitchell Kois
From: Barry Simon <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 8:29 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis
Subject: 11c - SUPPORT Extension of RPG term for Civic ENA

Please extend the ENA agreement to allow RPG the time needed to properly validate this project for our city’s future.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
Barry SImon
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 982 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 32 507 California Ave
Santa Monica, CA
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 983 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 33 Mitchell Kois
From: Mitchell Greenhill <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 8:22 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: Save the Santa Monica Civic

EXTERNAL
Dear Santa Monica City Council:

As a resident of Santa Monica since 1976, I to urge you to proceed towards saving the saving the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium. Grant the necessary extension and do NOT be distracted from the goal in partnership with the consortium RPG.

Our business, Folklore Inc., presented Pete Seeger at the Civic Auditorium many years ago. Earlier the iconic building hosted the likes of James Brown, the Rolling Stones, Chuck Berry, etc etc. I know from first-hand experience how cultural centers around the nation have revitalized the financial health, spirit and identity of communities. As you well know, the City of Santa Monica is currently facing a host of challenges. Give us all the revitalized Santa Monica Civic Auditorium as a central vision around which we all can rally with pride.

The recent Santa Monica Mirror article by Architect and former Planning Commission member Mario Fonda-Bonardi of S.M.a.r.t. Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow expresses my feelings precisely, so I quote it below.

Thank you,
Mitchell Greenhill
3010 7th Street
Santa Monica, CA 90405

1. It maintains the building as a state-of-the-art music and performance venue that it was originally meant to be.

2. It preserves the historic defining features of this Landmark: the clean, simple lines, the mass of the tall fly vs the curved roof, the dramatic facade with spires, etc, .etc. While only one of six Santa Monica criteria are necessary to be landmarked, this is the only Santa Monica building that meets all six of the landmarking criteria.

3. RPG is the right size and has the experience and resources to tackle such a large, demanding project.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 984 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 34 4. This 2500 to 3000-seat theater restoration will inject some optimism and refurbish Santa Monica’s image as music/performance destination. Such signature investments in high-visibility projects can alter the gloomy cloud that is hanging over the regional economy.

5. The reopening of this dormant building will have a substantial activation benefit to this dead corner of the block.

6. RPG has already cleared one financial hurdle, having gotten their project’s preliminary approval by the California State Historic Preservation Office. This approval, along with its National Registry, is essential to making available the federal tax credits, which are key to the feasibility of what will be a multi-million dollar rehabilitation.

7. Large cultural destinations have a multiplier effect on the local economy. For every dollar sold in ticket purchases, it’s not unusual for the local economy to get an additional $6 boost. This is very valuable to a financially struggling City. Just the announcement that this is in the works will start ginning up the local economy.

8. This building is perfectly sited for its role as a music destination within two blocks of seven major hotels and at the end of the 10 freeway and the EXPO light rail line and within 20-25 minutes to LAX.

People who attend and perform at the kinds of events being proposed are willing to travel and often need a place to stay.

9. Adding a new music venue here may make it possible to have a “performing arts complex” with simultaneous musical festival performances at the Civic, at Barnum Hall, and at the Greek Theater on the high school campus.

10. Finally, it both honors the memories of all the stars who played there, the memories of all their fans (many of whom still live in Santa Monica), and it also creates a new source of wonderful memories for the fans and performers who will play there this century. This includes young public school children who will perform there under the banner of programs such as Stairways to the Stars.

The next step is to do a detailed cost estimate and feasibility study to see that the design and programming (with the various alternatives) is feasible and “pencils out” allowing for all the uncertainties, revisions, delays inherent in construction, and considering the vagaries of audience response. These financial studies take time and are essential to the structuring the final lease deal with the City. RPG is asking for a 6-month extension to the original Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) to do this financial workup. It is worth the time to do it right to preclude as much as possible downstream surprises.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 985 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 35 Mitchell Kois
From: phillis dudick <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 8:20 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Ellis Raskin; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall
Subject: 10/14 AGENDA ITEM 11-C SUPPORT FOR 180 DAY EXTENSION

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor Negrete and Councilmembers:

As a 30+ year Santa Monica resident, firstly I want to thank our Council for entering into an exclusive agreement with the RPG organization and for continuing negotiations.

I recognize there have been some disruptions, including the effects of the Palisades fire on member(s) of the group. However, do find this group highly intentioned and committed.

We've now reached the final mile and are being asked for 180 days to complete a multi-layered analysis and negotiation with the City. I strongly support this effort.

So far, The Civic vision presented shows a potential boon for our economy, and also, importantly, a boon for our collective Samta Monica "spirit" and pride.

This magnificent, internationally recognized, architectural masterpiece holds Santa Monica history and past glory, which can be renewed for generations to come.

Revitalized, The Civic can address our collective hunger for the performing arts in Santa Monica, enhance quality of life intergenerationally, and become a destination for those near and far.

The bottom line, however, is important too. The staff report is based on financial hypotheticals at this point. By granting RPG the time they say they need to complete the data, we will clearly know what is possible.

We've come this far. Please grant RPG a 180-day extension.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
Phillis Dudick
Santa Monica Resident
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 986 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 36 Mitchell Kois
From: Roberta Levitow <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 8:10 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: Save the Santa Monica Civic

EXTERNAL
Dear Santa Monica City Council:

I am writing to you as a 30-year + resident of Santa Monica to urge you to proceed towards saving the saving the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium. Grant the necessary extension and do NOT be distracted from the goal in partnership with the consortium RPG.

I am now a retired cultural worker and I know from first-hand experience how cultural centers around the nation have revitalized the financial health, spirit and identity of communities. As you well know, the City of Santa Monica is currently facing a host of challenges. Give us all the revitalized Santa Monica Civic Auditorium as a central vision around which we all can rally with pride.

Thank you,
Roberta Levitow
3010 7th Street
Santa Monica, CA 90405

1. It maintains the building as a state-of-the-art music and performance venue that it was originally meant to be.

3. RPG is the right size and has the experience and resources to tackle such a large, demanding project.

4. This 2500 to 3000-seat theater restoration will inject some optimism and refurbish Santa Monica’s image as music/performance destination. Such signature investments in high-visibility projects can alter the gloomy cloud that is hanging over the regional economy.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 987 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 37 5. The reopening of this dormant building will have a substantial activation benefit to this dead corner of the block.

People who attend and perform at the kinds of events being proposed are willing to travel and often need a place to stay.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 988 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 38 Mitchell Kois
From: Dahvi Waller <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 8:00 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: [email protected]; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: SUPPORT Agenda Item 11-C – (1/14/25) Grant the Extension needed by ENA to Save the Civic

EXTERNAL
Dear Santa Monica Council,
I am writing to request that you extend the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) for the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium restoration project as requested by Revitalization Partners Group (RPG).

Extending the ENA agreement by six months will allow RPG the time needed to complete essential detailed cost estimates and financial feasibility studies. This additional time has been requested to structure a sound lease agreement and minimize downstream surprises in this complex, multimillion-dollar project.

The following are impressive and important aspects to the proposal:

RPG commits that their proposal will require no City money or bonds, but to financing the project on its own.

A new park is planned on the site of the existing parking lot, adding green open space.

The project leverages federal tax credits already preliminarily approved by the California State Historic Preservation Office The City’s existing downtown parking facilities will meet the demand created by events at the Civic, which is located near major hotels, the Expo line, and has freeway access.

Thank you,
Dahvi Waller
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 989 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 39 Mitchell Kois
From: Wendy Nishikawa Jaffa <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 7:58 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; councilmtgitems
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,
I am writing to express my support for the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium restoration project led by Revitalization Partners Group (RPG) and to urge you to extend the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) by 6 months. RPG has presented a design concept that preserves the Civic’s historic character while creating a modern, accessible 3,000-seat performance venue. The plan maintains the building’s iconic exterior, includes essential seismic upgrades and accessibility improvements, and adds complementary outdoor spaces and amenities. This project offers tremendous benefits to Santa Monica: • Preserves our only building meeting all 6 landmarking criteria while returning it to its original purpose as a premier music venue • Provides significant economic impact through the cultural destination multiplier effect ($6 for every $1 in ticket sales) • Revitalizes a dormant corner near 7 major hotels, the Expo line, and the freeway • Leverages federal tax credits already preliminarily approved by the California State Historic Preservation Office RPG needs the 6-month extension to complete essential detailed cost estimates and financial feasibility studies. This is a rare opportunity to revitalize downtown, help restore Santa Monica’s reputation as a performance destination, and bring back the economic prosperity our city needs. Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely, Wendy Jaffa
1842-20th ST
Santa Monica, CA 90404
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 990 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 40 Mitchell Kois
From: Wendy Dembo <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 7:28 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,
I am wriƟng to express my support for the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium restoraƟon project led by RevitalizaƟon Partners Group
(RPG) and to urge you to extend the Exclusive NegoƟaƟng Agreement (ENA) by 6 months.

This project offers tremendous benefits to Santa Monica:
• Preserves our only building, meeƟng all 6 landmarking criteria while returning it to its original purpose as a premier music venue • Provides significant economic impact through the cultural desƟnaƟon mulƟplier effect ($6 for every $1 in Ɵcket sales) • Revitalizes a dormant corner near 7 major hotels, the Expo line, and the freeway • Leverages federal tax credits already preliminarily approved by the California State Historic PreservaƟon Office RPG needs the 6-month extension to complete essenƟal, detailed cost esƟmates and financial feasibility studies. This is a rare opportunity to revitalize downtown, help restore Santa Monica’s reputaƟon as a performance desƟnaƟon, and bring back the economic prosperity our city needs.

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely,
Wendy Dembo
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 991 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 41 Mitchell Kois
From: Caitlin Moore <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 7:07 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely,
Caitlin
This message was sent from my phone, please excuse typos.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 992 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 42 Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 6:27 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: RE: Item 11C Approval to extend ENA with RPG for six-months

Your support of this request is greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,
Jodi Summers
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 993 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 43 Mitchell Kois
From: Dwight Twilley <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 6:14 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Santa Monica Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Council,
Please help save the Historic Santa Monica Civic Auditorium. Many of us attended shows & events there.

At one time it “was” the place to play in LA and to to in LA.

Sincerely,
Jan Twilley
CEO
Dwight Twilley Productions
蚙蚚蚛
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 994 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 44 Mitchell Kois
From: Gary Freedman <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 5:40 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete
Subject: Agenda Item 11-C

EXTERNAL
To The Santa Monica City Council
As a long time Santa Moncia resident (more than 50 years) I enjoyed many events and concerts at the Santa Monica
Civic Auditorium.

I very much look forward to its revitalization and urge you to vote to extend the ENA agreement with RPG for the 6 months requested.

Sincerely,
Gary and Donna Freedman
533 9th Street.

Santa Monica, CA 90402
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 995 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 45 Mitchell Kois
From: William Schoene <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 1:46 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,
We are wriƟng to express our support for the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium restoraƟon project led by RevitalizaƟon Partners Group
(RPG) and to urge you to extend the Exclusive NegoƟaƟng Agreement (ENA) by 6 months.

We went to many concerts at the Civic; it was a great venue for up-and-coming bands. We look forward to going there again.

This project offers tremendous benefits to ;Santa Monica:
• Preserves our only building meeƟng all 6 landmarking criteria while returning it to its original purpose as a premier music venue • Provides significant economic impact through the cultural desƟnaƟon mulƟplier effect ($6 for every $1 in Ɵcket sales) • Revitalizes a dormant corner near 7 major hotels, the Expo line, and the freeway • Leverages federal tax credits already preliminarily approved by the California State Historic PreservaƟon Office RPG needs the 6-month extension to complete essenƟal detailed cost esƟmates and financial feasibility studies. This is a rare opportunity to revitalize downtown, help restore Santa Monica’s reputaƟon as a performance desƟnaƟon, and bring back the economic prosperity our city needs.

Again, we urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely,
Mr. & Mrs. William J. Schoene
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 996 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 46 Mitchell Kois
From: Heather Staves <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 1:23 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: RE: Item 11C Approval to extend ENA with RPG for six-months

Your support of this request is greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,
Heather
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 997 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 47 Mitchell Kois
From: Evelyn Lauchenauer <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 12:03 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

Thank you,
Evelyn Lauchenauer
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 998 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 48 Mitchell Kois
From: girltunes <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 11:28 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: SUPPORT Agenda Item 11-C – (1/14/25) Grant the Extension needed by ENA to Save the Civic

EXTERNAL
Dear Santa Monica City Council,
Please SUPPORT Agenda Item 11-C - (1/14/25) -- grant the extension needed by ENA to save our Civic Center.

I stand with Northeast Neighbors Association whose position stated the following:

Santa Monica Forward is an influential developer-funded political machine cloaked in “progressive” branding that is masterful at hijacking the narrative in this city.

The Santa Monica Daily Press reported today on the conflict:

Civic Auditorium proponents challenge City analysis of revitalization plan 10/13/25 -- Santa Monica Daily Press
https://smdp.com/uncategorized/hopeful-saviors-of-the-civic-challenge-city-analysis-of-revitalization-plan/ Northeast Neighbors requests that the City Council extend the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) for the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium restoration project as requested by Revitalization Partners Group (RPG).

The following are impressive and important aspects to the proposal:

RPG commits that their proposal will require no City money or bonds, but to financing the project on its own.

A new park is planned on the site of the existing parking lot, adding green open space.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 999 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 49 Thank you for your consideration. Please act in favor of what the residents desire and deserve rather than the developers.

Sincerely,
Ferris Gluck
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1000 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 50 Mitchell Kois
From: Shari Phillips <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 11:22 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: SUPPORT Agenda Item 11-C – (1/14/25) Grant the Extension needed by ENA to Save the Civic

EXTERNAL
Dear City Council Members and Mayor Negrete,
I’d like to ask the City Council to extend the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) for the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium restoration project as requested by Revitalization Partners Group (RPG).

I feel preserving the Civic Auditorium at no cost to the city is a worthwhile project. With so many projects that ask for the taxpayers to cough up more money, this is a welcome project. My kids performed at the auditorium all through their public school years and our family has attended many events until it was closed. Please do not allow yet another historic institution be taken away from our city.

Sincerely,
Shari Phillips
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1001 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 51 Mitchell Kois
From: Dannie Charney <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 11:22 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick Subject: Subject: SUPPORT Agenda Item 11-C – (1/14/25) Grant the Extension needed by ENA to Save the Civic.

EXTERNAL
Re: SUPPORT Agenda Item 11-C – (1/14/25) Extension needed for Civic ENA I greatly request that the City Council extend the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) for the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium restoration project as requested by Revitalization Partners Group (RPG).

The following are impressive and important aspects to the proposal:

RPG commits that their proposal will require no City money or bonds, but to financing the project on its own.

RPG has presented a plan that preserves the Civic’s historic characterwhile creating a modern, accessible 2,500-3,000 seat performance venue. The plan maintains the building’s iconic exterior, includes essential seismic upgrades and full accessibility improvements, adding complementary outdoor spaces and amenities.

A new park is planned on the site of the existing parking lot, adding green open space.

The project leverages federal tax credits already preliminarily approved by the California State Historic Preservation Office
The City’s existing downtown parking facilities will meet the demandcreated by events at the Civic, which is located near major hotels, the Expo line, and has freeway access.

Thank you
Danielle Charney
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1002 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 52 Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1003 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 53 Mitchell Kois
From: Ann Hoover <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 11:17 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; Jennifer Taylor; Nia Tang; Susan Cline; Heidi von Tongeln; Susan Cola; Oscar Santiago; Jing Yeo; Jenny Rogers; Sofia Klatzker; Micah Akerson; Steven Johnson; Maryanne LaGuardia; John Smith; Sonam Makker; Barry Rosenbaum; Karen Melick; Peter James
Subject: October 14, 2025 Council Meeting - Item 11.C. - Civic Auditorium -santa monc ENA with RPG

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete, Mayor Pro Tem Torosis, and Esteemed Councilmembers - I write today to encourage all of you to take the next step to honor the civic heart of our City and to nurture, preserve, and enhance for continued public use our Civic Auditorium and what's supposed to be the "Civic Auditorium Park" surrounding it per the Civic Center Specific Plan. https://www.santamonica.gov/media/Document%20Library/Topic%20Explainers/Planning%20Resour ces/Civic%20Center%20Specific%20Plan%202018.05.22%20amended.pdf Accordingly, please vote in favor of a 6-month extension of the ENA with RPG.

Three (3) months is too short a timeframe given that RPG would need be back at Council on January 15th, right after the November / December holidays. Three months also is not a realistic timeframe when 4 sets of attorneys need to vet everything. So let's please be anticipatory, reasonable, thoughtful, and kind and support a 6-month extension with a hard stop to see the full-blown business plan.

Also, please remember that -
(1) Since the ENA was sent to RPG for review last August 2024, we've...  ...had 2 City Managers and 1 Interim City Manager,
 Council composition has changed significantly with the addition of 4 new members,  the Palisades and Eaton fires occurred and at least 2 RPG principals lost their homes,  as a result of City leadership turnover, certain aspects of the negotiation to date likely may have been tweaked or been refocused, which would require, at minimum, additional time for RPG to process, analyze, respond and incorporate; and
(2) RPG did not seek out the Civic Auditorium opportunity. Instead, it came forward from resident advocacy - RPG in so many ways is doing us a favor by taking this project on, not the other way around. In somehow dismissing or disrespecting RPG's efforts tonight, the community would be dismissed and disrespected as well. I ask you to please not do that.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1004 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 54 Instead, let’s treat this opportunity with the respect and fairness, excitement and gratitude that it deserves.

RPG is made up of the best in the business; they deserve our highest professional courtesy and esteem. The public deserves that as well.

And the foregoing are right in line with the City Team's new values of HUMILITY, INTEGRITY, MOTIVATION, AND CARE. Please model for everyone in town what this looks like by extending the ENA with RPG for 6 months.

Thank you -
Ann Bowman
Resident, 29 years
Recreation and Parks Commissioner
Civic Center Task Force Co-Chair
Great Park Coalition Board of Directors
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1005 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 55 Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 10:40 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Natalya Zernitskaya; Oliver Chi
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - Marc Verville letter Attachments: SMCC 2025-10-14 Item 11.C. - Written Comment - Verville 10-12-2025.pdf

EXTERNAL
October 13, 2025
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Council members,
I don't always agree with Marc Verville, but in the attached letter that he wrote to you, I think he's hit the nail on the head in explaining why the City Council should extend the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) with the RPG group for 6 months.

As you can see from Marc's LinkedIn.com entry --
https://www.linkedin.com/in/marc-l-verville-60180 --
he's had many years of experience in finance in the entertainment industry, including executive positions with Warner Bros. and the Walt Disney Company, and he earned an MBA from the Anderson School of Management at UCLA.

Please read Marc's letter.

Zina Josephs

************************************************
Vice President, Finance and Technology
 Warner Bros. Entertainment Group of Companies
Apr 2019 - Oct 2019 7 months
Burbank

To help
protect your
privacy,
Micro so ft
Office
prevented
auto matic
download of
this picture
from the
Internet.

Machinima,
Inc., a
division of
Warner Bros.

Digital Net Head of Finance and Technology
Machinima, Inc., a division of Warner Bros. Digital Networks, Inc.

Aug 2014 - Mar 2019 4 years 8 months
Greater Los Angeles Area

To help
protect your
privacy,
Micro so ft
Office
prevented
auto matic
download of
this picture
from the
Internet.

Warner Bros.

Entertainmen
t Group of
Companies Warner Bros. Entertainment Group of Companies 8 years 9 months
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1006 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 56 o Vice President Finance and Business Analysis, Home Entertainment

Jan 2013 - Mar 2015 2 years 3 months
Burbank
o VP Finance and Administration

Jul 2006 - Dec 2012 6 years 6 months

To help
protect your
privacy,
Micro so ft
Office
prevented
auto matic
download of
this picture
from the
Internet.

SVP Corporate Finance
Gemstar - TV Guide International, Inc.

Nov 2003 - Jul 2006 2 years 9 months

To help
protect your
privacy,
Micro so ft
Office
prevented
auto matic
download of
this picture
from the
Internet.

Chief Financial Officer
Radical Communication, Inc.

May 2000 - Oct 2001 1 year 6 months

To help
protect your
privacy,
Micro so ft
Office
prevented
auto matic
download of
this picture
from the
Internet.

Walt Disney
Company
Graphic
Vice President Finance, International Television
Walt Disney Company
1995 - 2000 5 years

To help
protect your
privacy,
Micro so ft
Office
prevented
auto matic
download of
this picture
from the
Internet.

The Walt
Disney
Company
Graphic
Finance Manager at Television Animation (Production)
The Walt Disney Company
1989 - 1992 3 years

To help
protect your
privacy,
Micro so ft
Office
prevented
auto matic
download of
this picture
from the
Internet.

PRICEWATER
HOUSE

COOPERS,
S.C . Graphic
Senior Staff Accountant
PRICEWATERHOUSE COOPERS, S.C.
1986 - 1989 3 years
Century City, CA
Education

To help
protect your
privacy,
Micro so ft
Office
prevented
auto matic
download of
this picture
from the
Internet.

UCLA
Anderson
School of
Manag ement
Graphic University of California, Los Angeles - The Anderson School of Management MBA Business


To help
protect your
privacy,
Micro so ft
Office
prevented
auto matic
download of
this picture
from the
Internet.

California
State
University,
Northridge
Graphic California State University-Northridge
Bachelor’s Degree Business Administration and Management, Finance and Marketing Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1007 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) Dear City Council and City Manager Chi,
Re: SMCC 2025-10-14 Item 11.C. - Approval of First Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement with Revitalization Partners Group, LLC (RPG) for the Civic Center Auditorium Renovation, Programming and Operation
This note is to strong urge you to select Staff Option #1, Approve a six-month extension (two consecutive 90- day periods). As staff notes, this option would continue negotiations with RPG, while preserving the City’s ability to terminate if no viable plan emerges as prudent. This aligns with RPG’s sole request at this time which is a 180-day extension of the Exclusive Negotiation Agreement (ENA) in order to study and quantify the financial and other impacts before any deal is finalized.

There are several major economic positives in the RPG proposal that cannot be duplicated by any alternative use of the site.

2. Second, they are including a new park on the site of the existing parking lot, adding green open space to the sector of the City which has the highest rate of densification.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1008 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) There is NO OTHER OPTION for the site that can deliver the scale of benefits to the City that the RPG proposal provides. In addition to the direct economic multiplier that the RPG proposal provides, the City can increase the economic benefits even more by using the revitalized Civic as the catalyst to change its entire approach to managing its destination assets. Specifically, the City can abandon it’s legacy siloed asset management policies Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1009 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) and adopt a comprehensive, and integrated, destination asset portfolio asset management process. In this, the City can amplify economic benefits by coordinating the programming across all public destination assets and partnering with owners of the private assets to extend programming and synergistic activities. That asset portfolio includes:
• Year-round Mediterranean weather
• A live entertainment venue at the Civic Center
• SM Place shopping
• Promenade dining and entertainment
• 245 acres of world class beach
• A globally branded and historic pleasure pier
• Comprehensive hotel options
The city’s unique destination asset portfolio cannot be duplicated by Westfield, Caruso or any other singlevenue destination.

It should also be noted that:

I do not think it is hyperbole to state that denial of a 6-month ENA extension will represent active support of permanent city economic decline.

Please approve RPG’s request for a 6-month ENA extension.

Thank you,
Marc L. Verville
Former Audit Subcommittee Chair
Sunset Park, Santa Monica
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1010 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) nb: I have also attached a PDF of this note in case the charts are not included in the body of this email Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1011 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 57 Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 10:40 PM
To: 'Santa Monica City Council:'; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; councilmtgitems Cc: Oliver Chi; Nia Tang; Jennifer Taylor
Subject: October 14, 2025 Council Meeting - Item 11.C. - Civic Auditorium

Thank you for understanding that this is a ONE-TIME-ONLY opportunity now for our City and that the community continues to value deeply having a Civic Center with the Auditorium as its centerpiece.

Sincerely,
David Crellin
142 Hart Ave
Santa Monica
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1012 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 58 Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 10:35 PM
To: 'Santa Monica City Council:'; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; councilmtgitems Cc: Oliver Chi; Nia Tang; Jennifer Taylor
Subject: October 14, 2025 Council Meeting - Item 11.C. - Civic Auditorium

The Civic Auditorium is a historic building that should be preserved and enjoyed by future generations. This is a wonderful opportunity for the city to have a state of the art music/arts venue that will create a civic and cultural center.

Sincerely,
Alison Stirland
142 Hart Avenue
Santa Monica
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1013 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 59 Mitchell Kois
From: Cathy Larson <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 10:15 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: SUBJECT: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

I support for the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium restoration project led by Revitalization Partners Group (RPG) and to urge you to extend the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) by 6 months.

The people of Santa Monica want the Civic Auditorium restored and used by the public. It is part of history and could become a vibrant current cultural resource as well.

Cathy Larson
Santa Monica resident
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1014 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 60 Mitchell Kois
From: Danny Guggenheim <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 10:03 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - Support for 6-month extension with RPG for the Civic

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,
The Civic is a special place for the thousands of us who have grown up here or otherwise spent decades here as residents. My favorite memory is volunteering at the 20th anniversary screening of Big Wednesday, but there were also so many great concerts….

This a great opportunity for SM on so many fronts. Please extend the ENA and give it a chance to become a reality.

Thank you.

Daniel Guggenheim
Sunset Park resident since 2006
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1015 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 61 Mitchell Kois
From: Karen Croner <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 9:57 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,
People used to come to Santa Monica because it was unique. We offered music, art. The Civic Center was a huge part of that. If you want to revitalize the city, revitalize the Civic Center with this agreement…It’s OUR Civic Center. Not yours. It belongs to the tax paying residents. Don’t drain our city of its soul. Care about the unique spirit of our
city and support music and art. Human beings are not just apartment units. Think Humans. Not Units.

Especially at this moment in our nations’ history.

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely,
Karen Croner
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1016 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 62 Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1017 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 63 Mitchell Kois
From: Nikki Kolhoff <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 9:35 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Cc: Oliver Chi; Savethecivic Info
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,
It feels like you are on a rampage to destroy every last cultural resource, neighborhood gem, and piece of Santa Monica history you can. Will anything be left after you are done serving your developer overlords? How visonless do you and your staff have to be to suggest a constant demolition and sale of everything that defines our town?

This project offers tremendous benefits to Santa Monica:
• Preserves our only building meeting all 6 landmarking criteria while returning it to its original purpose as a premier music venue
• Provides significant economic impact through the cultural destination multiplier effect ($6 for every $1 in ticket sales)
• Revitalizes a dormant corner near 7 major hotels, the Expo line, and the freeway • Leverages federal tax credits already preliminarily approved by the California State Historic Preservation Office RPG needs the 6-month extension to complete essential detailed cost estimates and financial feasibility studies.

This is a rare opportunity to revitalize downtown, help restore Santa Monica’s reputation as a performance destination, and bring back the economic prosperity our city needs.

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months. It's the only defensible choice.

Regards,
Nikki Kolhoff
Santa Monica Resident and Voter
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1018 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 64 Mitchell Kois
From: Leanna Einbinder <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 9:15 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely,
Leanna Einbinder
90405
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1019 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 65 Mitchell Kois
From: Santa Monica City Manager's Office
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 9:13 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: FW: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium
From: Tina <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 7:12 AM
To: Santa Monica City Manager's Office <[email protected]> Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

This project offers tremendous benefits to Santa Monica: • Preserves our only building meeting all 6 landmarking criteria while returning it to its original purpose as a premier music venue • Provides significant economic impact through the cultural destination multiplier effect ($6 for every $1 in ticket sales) • Revitalizes a dormant corner near 7 major hotels, the Expo line, and the freeway • Leverages federal tax credits already preliminarily approved by the California State Historic Preservation Office RPG needs the 6-month extension to complete essential detailed cost estimates and financial feasibility studies. This is a rare opportunity to revitalize downtown, help restore Santa Monica’s reputation as a performance destination, and bring back the economic prosperity our city needs.

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely,
Tina Cox
90405
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1020 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 66 Mitchell Kois
From: Zoey Grecco <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 8:59 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Save the Santa Monica Civic!

EXTERNAL
Dear Council,
My name is Zoey Grecco and I live at 1701 Pier Ave unit b, Santa Monica CA 90405. I am 25 years old. I would love to have a Santa Monica based concert venue. Please save the civic.

Sincerely,
Zoey Grecco
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1021 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 67 Mitchell Kois
From: Jake Simon <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 8:54 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis
Subject: 11c - SUPPORT Extension of RPG term for Civic ENA

EXTERNAL
Hi folks
I am writing to express my support for the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium restoration project led by Revitalization Partners Group (RPG). I've long hoped for something to be done there. We need to get Santa Monica back to business!
Thanks!
Jake
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1022 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 68 Mitchell Kois
From: LINDA KNAB <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 8:50 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Santa Monica needs to preserve and restore the Civic Auditorium. It has so much important history and when restored will be a wonderful state of the art venue for Santa Monica.

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely,
Linda Reinbold
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1023 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 69 Mitchell Kois
From: Paula Mazur <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 8:45 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely,
Paula Mazur
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1024 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 70 Mitchell Kois
From: Lois Bostwick <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 8:31 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely,
Lois Bostwick
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1025 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 71 Mitchell Kois
From: A Erickson <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 8:18 PM
Subject: Support for RPG and City to continue the process to revitalize the Civic Auditorium (Item 11C)

EXTERNAL
To members of the Santa Monica City Council,
As a longtime Santa Monica resident, I would urge you to continue the work to save the Santa Monica Civic auditorium.

It's such a unique piece of architecture in a perfect location in the city’s Civic Center.

With so many events happening in the greater Los Angeles area, Santa Monica would benefit from restoring the Civic as a working auditorium. And the RPG group has a wonderful vision of how to make the Civic and its surroundings a world-class venue. Hopefully, the review process would be under the SM Landmarks Commission for design review, which would then ensure that RPG would follow procedures in accordance with the Landmarks Ordinance.

RPG seems to have developed a well-thought out plan to rehab the structure. There will be no public financing, and there will be a new park and marketplace with an outdoor concert area. What an asset for Santa Monica!
I hope the City Council will grab this ‘win’ for the City of Santa Monica. Do not allow this piece of Santa Monica’s history slip through your fingers. Instead, ensure that it will become a vibrant part of Santa Monica's future!
Sincerely,
AnnaLisa Erickson
AnnaLisa Erickson
[email protected]
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1026 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 72 Mitchell Kois
From: Suze Q Puszkiewicz <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 8:05 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: Save The Historic Santa Monica Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Member
Im writing this because I believe in the value of the Civic Auditorium.

I've enjoyed so many wonderful events there in the past.

I was disheartened when it closed.

I remember seeing Lenny Kravitz return there for a concert.

The Gem and Jewelry show held there yearly.

Thanksgiving for the Community Homeless by Volunteers yearly.

Awards Cermonies etc.

We are now losing Bergamot Station.

Our shopping centers.

Community Restaurants.

Our Community Beach feel.

Enormous Apartment complexes consume us.

What are you leaving us in the community to enjoy?
Please save and restore The Historic Santa Monica Civic Auditorium to bring back Community Events.

Quit removing everything we have formed memories with. Things that make us a Community. Things that make the residents feel Santa Monica Strong.

Preserve our history as you guide it into its future. Expensive high rise communities only make us feel more isolated and lost in the cement and mortar.

Thank you
Susan Puszkiewicz
30 year resident
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1027 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 73 Mitchell Kois
From: Leisle Bartley <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 7:45 PM
To: [email protected]; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; councilmtgitems Cc: Oliver Chi; Nia Tang; Jennifer Taylor
Subject: October 14, 2025 Council Meeting - Item 11.C. - Civic Auditorium

Our community wants a restored, vibrant PUBLIC Civic Auditorium to serve as a venue for the performing, musical and visual arts! We want our community to be a cultural and arts destination for those of us in Santa Monica and surrounding communities. A destination for great events right here in Santa Monica - bringing the community together! A world class concert and performing arts center would provide the city with a revenue stream for decades - and bring wonderful cultural entertainment to town! Not to mention the economic activity bringing people to the hotels and restaurants when people travel to Santa Monica for the concerts and events at the Civic Auditorium! Thank you for understanding that this is a ONE-TIME-ONLY opportunity now for our City and that the community continues to deeply value having a Civic Center with the Auditorium as its centerpiece.

Sincerely,
Leisle Bartley
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1028 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 74 Mitchell Kois
From: Wendy <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 7:18 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: RE: Item 11C Approval to extend ENA with RPG for six-months

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
Please extend the original Exclusive NegoƟaƟng Agreement (ENA) with RPG for six months to allow compleƟon of the financial analysis and negoƟaƟons for the restoraƟon of the landmark Santa Monica Civic Auditorium. The proposed state-of-the-art facility will be an important asset for the City’s performing arts, culture, finances, and reputaƟon.

I strongly support this extension of the ENA for RPG. The Civic Auditorium has been an important venue in the history of Santa Monica for so many events. In my own personal life I’ve experienced junior high graduaƟons, countless movie and concert events, charity sales (the Colleagues sale). This venue can again be a valued asset in the community if this group is given a chance to submit their full plan. I hope they include plans for underground parking to replace the above ground lot.

Your support of this request is greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,
Wendy Fulton
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1029 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 75 Mitchell Kois
From: Cinnamon Chaney <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 6:38 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: May 28, 2024 Agenda Item 4D

EXTERNAL
Please conƟnue to work with RPG to save the Civic Center! Cinnamon Chaney
5th St
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1030 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 76 Mitchell Kois
From: Chuck Hoover <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 6:18 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Cc: councilmtgitems; Nia Tang; Oliver Chi; Jennifer Taylor Subject: 10/14/25 Council Meeting - Item 11.C. - Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and Councilmembers -
Please approve a 6-month extension of the ENA with RPG, and ask RPG to return with a fullydeveloped proposal and financing plan at the end of that period.

This is an unique opportunity for our City to figure out how to revitalize the Civic Auditorium, which is an important part of the City history and can be an important part of the future.

Thank you for your consideration.

Chuck Hoover
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1031 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 77 Mitchell Kois
From: Helen Landon <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 6:07 PM
Subject: Item 11C Support for RPG and City to continue the process to revitalize the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor, City Council Members and City Manager,
I don’t want to see the city selling off a treasure such as the Civic. We’ll never get it back. It’s there. Let’s honor it and preserve it, not just for the memories, but for the future.

How lucky is our city to have a publicly owned venue for all kinds of cultural activities. It should not end up in privately owned hands. You have an opportunity to do something that current residents as well as future generations will thank you for.

I am writing to ask that you please extend the current negotiations with RPG. Please allow them the necessary time to continue their planning and to bring something exciting and ultimately lucrative back to our city. I would love to see the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium restored and put back into use. There are so many wonderful events and activities that took place there for so many years and that could take place going forward.

I urge you to continue to negotiate in good faith with RPG. Ending discussions now would be a tragic missed opportunity and a huge loss for all of us.

Sincerely,
Helen Zielinski Landon
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1032 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 78 Mitchell Kois
From: Louis Landon <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 5:49 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: : My support for SM Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
City Council and City Manager,
As a long-time resident of Santa Monica who has appreciated and attended events at the Civic when it was open, I urge you to continue the negotiations with RPG so that our city can have a fully restored, state-of-the-art, Civic Auditorium!! We need it and have nothing like it.

Please do not sell it- that is selling a public city resource that can never be replaced! I urge you to continue to negotiate in good faith with RPG.

Thank you.

Louis Landon
229 San Vicente Blvd. #E
Santa Monica , CA 90402
[email protected]
310-210-3535
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1033 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 79 Mitchell Kois
From: Tricia Crane <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 5:47 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: SUPPORT Agenda Item 11-C – (1/14/25) Grant the Extension needed by ENA to Save the Civic

EXTERNAL
To: Santa Monica City Council
From: The Board of Northeast Neighbors
Re: SUPPORT Agenda Item 11-C – (1/14/25) Grant the Extension needed by ENA to Save the Civic Northeast Neighbors requests that the City Council extend the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) for the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium restoration project as requested by Revitalization Partners Group (RPG).

The following are impressive and important aspects to the proposal:

RPG commits that their proposal will require no City money or bonds, but to financing the project on its own.

A new park is planned on the site of the existing parking lot, adding green open space.

Thank you
Tricia Crane, Chair
on behalf of the Board of Northeast Neighbors
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1034 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 80 Mitchell Kois
From: Matt Goldenberg D.O. <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 5:45 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

This is a longstanding community resource. I played stairway to the stars as a kid and I want future residents to have the same opportunity to experience the community engagement and pride at a revitalized Civic Auditorium.

Please do everything possible to keep the Civic in our community and accessible to all.

Matt Goldenberg
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1035 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 81 Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 5:38 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; [email protected]; Jesse Zwick
Subject: CITY COUNCIL 10/14 ITEM 11-C-SUPPORT 6-MONTH EXTENSION OF ENA FOR CIVIC

AUDITORIUM

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Kay Ward
Wilmont
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1036 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 82 Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 5:28 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Natalya Zernitskaya; Oliver Chi
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C -- Civic Aud -- Memories + Civic Auds in nearby cities

EXTERNAL
October 13, 2025

To: Mayor Negrete and City Council members
From: Zina Josephs
RE: 10/14/25 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium It occurs to me that some of the City Council members may not have been living here before 2013 and/or may have never attended an event at the Santa Monica Civic. So, here are some of my personal memories of the Civic Auditorium, plus some additional information:
1) TV broadcasts from the Civic Auditorium of the Academy Awards:
“Home of the Academy Awards”: https://calisphere.org/item/0d8424127112a8e39250eede23132c7c/ 1961: The 33rd Annual Academy Awards at Santa Monica Civic Auditorium. Best Actor in a Supporting Role goes to Peter Ustinov. Shirley Jones accepts the Oscar for Best Actress in a Supporting Role. Greer Garson announces the award for Best Actor. Burt Lancaster receives the award for his leading role in “Elmer Gantry.” Yul Brynner announces Elizabeth Taylor as the winner of Best Actress for her role in “Butterfield 8.” Audrey Hepburn announces the winner for Best Picture. Billy Wilder, the producer of the film “The Apartment,” accepts the Oscar.
1962: The 34th Annual Oscars held at the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium. Rita Moreno receives the award for the best supporting actress. The best actor award goes to Maximilian Schell and best actress award to Sophia Loren. The best picture award goes to “West Side Story.” 1964: The 36th Academy Awards at the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium. Gregory Peck announces the Best Actress award for Patricia Neal…Frank Sinatra announces the winner of Best Picture. “Tom Jones” gets Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1037 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 83 the Best Picture award…Anne Bancroft announces the winner of the Best Actor award. Sidney Poitier receives Best Actor award for his performance in “Lilies of the Field.” He is the first African American to receive the Best Actor Award.
1966: Santa Monica History Museum: The 38th Academy Awards ceremony, hosted by Bob Hope, was held at the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium. It was the first Academy Awards to be broadcast live in color.

The two most nominated films were "Dr. Zhivago" and "The Sound of Music." 2) While at USC, a friend and I attended a sold-out concert by the legendary Pete Seeger. It was a sing-along with 3,000 people in the audience.
3) When my husband was working at the RAND Corporation and we were living in an apartment on 4th & Bay, we walked over to the Civic to attend a sold-out concert by Peter, Paul and Mary. 4) When our daughter was at Grant Elementary, she performed in SMMUSD “Stairway of the Stars” concerts at the Civic, along with 1,000 other elementary middle, and high school student musicians each year. There were 2 sold-out performances every year.

Other performers at the Civic included David Bowie, Sonic Youth, Dinosaur, Jr., Screaming Trees, Cell, Fluf, The Cramps, Klaus Nomi, Top Jimmy & The Rhythm Pigs, Eric Clapton, Frank Sinatra, Village People, Mötley Crüe, Dave Brubeck, Laura Nyro, The Limeliters, Ella Fitzgerald, Elton John, Free, Traffic, Prince, Tim Buckley, Bob Dylan, James Brown and The Rolling Stones in the legendary T.A.M.I Show, Pink Floyd, George Carlin, The Eagles, and "Weird Al" Yankovic. 2) Albums recorded at the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Albums_recorded_at_the_Santa_Monica_Civic_Auditorium a) 1961 – The Kingston Trio – “Live at Santa Monica Civic Auditorium” -- released 2007 b) 1963 – George Shearing Quintet – “Jazz Concert”
c) 1972 – Ella Fitzgerald, Count Basie Orchestra – “Jazz at the Santa Monica Civic ‘72” d) 1972 – David Bowie's Ziggy Stardust tour – “Live Santa Monica ‘72” – released legally in 2008 e) 1972 – George Carlin – “Class Clown”
f) 1980 – The Eagles – “Eagles Live”
g) 1980 – Fleetwood Mac – “Live”
h) 1995 – Phish – “A Live One” (platinum)
3) Here are some nearby cities that have Civic Auditoriums:
a) Bellflower has the Bristol Civic Auditorium
https://www.bellflower.org/departments/parks___recreation/recreation_facilities/bristol_civic_auditorium.php Culver City has its Veterans Memorial Building, which includes an auditorium. https://wwwculvercityhistoricalsociety.org/veterans-memorial-building/ Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1038 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 84 c) Glendale has its Civic Auditorium.
https://www.glendaleca.gov/government/departments/community-services-parks/parks-facilities-historicsites/glendale-civic-auditorium d) Malibu has the Malibu Civic Theater, a large auditorium that was previously privately owned. https://www.malibucity.org/facilities/facility/details/Malibu-City-Hall-3 e) Pasadena has its Pasadena Civic Auditorium.
https://www.visitpasadena.com/civic-auditorium/
f) San Gabriel has its Civic Auditorium (San Gabriel Mission Playhouse)\ https://www.lahtf.org/theaters/missionplayhouse/ -- The San Gabriel Mission Playhouse is an opulent theater steeped in history, complete with tapestries presented by the King of Spain, a beautifully carved and painted ceiling, a fully operational Wurlitzer Theatre Organ, and chandeliers that replicate the lanterns used on Spanish galleons which sailed around the tip of South America en route to California in the 1800’s. g) Torrance has its Armstrong Theatre.
https://arts.torranceca.gov/our-city/general-services/cultural-arts/james-r-armstrong-theatr h) Thousand Oaks has its Civic Arts Plaza Theatres.
https://www.toaks.org/departments/cultural-affairs/civic-arts-plaza-3340 i) The City of Los Angeles has the Greek Theatre.
https://www.lagreektheatre.com/connect/history-of-the-greek-theatre j) The County of Los Angeles has:
-- Walt Disney Concert Hall,
https://www.laphil.com/about/our-venues/about-the-walt-disney-concert-hall -- the Los Angeles Music Center, including
-- the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion,
-- the Mark Taper Forum,
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1039 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 85 -- the Ahmanson Theatre, and
-- the Kirk Douglas Theatre, plus
-- the Hollywood Bowl, and
-- the nearby Ford Amphitheatre.
k) Orange County has the Segerstrom Center for the Performing Arts (originally the Orange County Center for the Performing Arts) -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Segerstrom_Center_for_the_Arts ************************************************************************* These performing arts centers are sources of pride, and they bring people together in a positive way. The Santa Monica Civic Auditorium should continue to be City-owned, per the Civic Center Specific Plan, and it should come back to life as a performing arts venue and a source of pride for the City of Santa Monica and its residents.

************************************************************************* Background:

Closing the Civic Auditorium was a “big deal” judging from the number of articles in local newspapers and City Council agenda items:

Santa Monica Civic Auditorium -- on the city web site:
http://www.smgov.net/departments/ccs/civicauditorium/
Civic Auditorium -- on Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Monica_Civic_Auditorium Civic Auditorium Declared a Landmark in 2002:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_City_of_Santa_Monica_Designated_Historic_Landmarks Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1040 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 86 "Santa Monica Civic to Get $47 Million Renovation" -- 5/30/11 -- Santa Monica Mirror - - http://www.smmirror.com/articles/News/Santa-Monica-Civic-Auditorium-to-Get-47-MillionRenovation/32286 "Civic Auditorium: Once and Future Masterpiece" -- 6/30/11 -- Santa Monica Dispatch - - http://www.santamonicadispatch.com/2011/06/civic-auditorium-once-and-future-masterpiece/ City Council -- 1/24/12 agenda item 3-M:

Revised Design-Build Contract for Civic Auditorium Remodel & Seismic Upgrade Recommended Action -- Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a revision to the previously approved Design-Build Contract No. 9396 (CCS) with Morley Construction Company, a California-based company, in an amount not to exceed $51,944,432 (includes a 5% contractor contingency, a 10% owner contingency, and allowances).

This not to exceed amount of $51,944,432 includes the previously Council approved amount ($35,000,000), preconstruction and design fee ($5,000,000), added scope ($4,000,000) and City’s owner contingency and allowances ($7,944,432).

2. Appropriate budget increases as outlined in the Financial Impacts & Budget Actions section of this report.

3. Authorize the Director of Public Works to issue any necessary change orders to complete the work within budget authority.
htttp://www01.smgov.net/cityclerk/council/agendas/2012/20120124/s2012012403-M.htm City Council -- 8/14/12 agenda item 4-C:

Contingency Planning Related to the Dissolution of Redevelopment Recommended Action -- Staff recommends that the City Council: Authorize staff to proceed with certain priority projects while suspending other priority projects, in light of recent legislative actions related to the dissolution of redevelopment; and Direct staff to return to council at a future date with additional information, as well as necessary appropriations or adjustments to project budgets.

Executive Summary -- This report provides information about recent amendments to the State law that dissolved redevelopment agencies, the impacts of those amendments upon the City’s ability to fund priority capital improvement projects, and recommendations regarding continued work on each project.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1041 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 87 http://www.smgov.net/departments/council/agendas/2012/20120814/s2012081408-C.htm "Council Stalls Civic, Samohi Improvements" -- 8/15/12 -- Santa Monica Daily Press - - http://www.smdp.com/council-stalls-civic-samohi-improvements/ "Historic Civic Will Go Dark" -- 8/15/12 -- Santa Monica Patch - - http://santamonica.patch.com/groups/politics-and-elections/p/historic-civic-will-go-dark City Council -- 10/23/12 agenda item 4-A:

Options for the future of the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium Recommended Action -- Staff recommends that the City Council review and provide direction on which options for the future of the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium Council wishes staff to further analyze for future decision-making.

Executive Summary -- The $51.9 million renovation of the landmark Santa Monica Civic Auditorium (Civic) is suspended due to recent legislative actions related to the dissolution of redevelopment and the uncertainty of funds designated for this project. The facility is still scheduled to close on June 30, 2013. Since the August 14, 2012 meeting at which City Council
authorized the suspension, staff has identified options for the facility and potential funding sources. These options fall under four broad categories: 1) partial renovation; 2) full renovation; 3) adaptive re-use; and 4) demolition.
http://www.smgov.net/departments/council/agendas/2012/20121023/s201210234A.pdf "Santa Monica Civic Auditorium Will Close in June as Planned" -- 10/26/12 -- Santa Monica0 Lookout - - http://www.surfsantamonica.com/ssm_site/the_lookout/news/News-2012/October2012/10_26_2012_Santa_Monica_Civic_Auditorium_Will_Close_in_June_As_Planned.html "City Council Sticks to Planned Closing Date for Civic Auditorium" -- 11/2/12 -- The Argonaut -- http://argonautnews.com/santa-monica-city-council-sticks-to-planned-closing-date-for-civic-auditorium/ "American Film Market: Civic Auditorium Theater Essential to the Future" -- 1/24/13 -- Santa Monica Daily Press -- http://smdp.com/afm-civic-auditorium-theater-essential-to-the-future/117191 Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1042 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 88 "'Save the Santa Monica Civic' Group Steps Forward" -- 5/7/13 -- Santa Monica Patch -- http://santamonica.patch.com/groups/politics-and-elections/p/save-the-civic-santa-monica "Civic Center Will Have to Learn New Tricks to Survive" -- 5/10/13 -- Santa Monica Daily Press - - http://smdp.com/civic-center-will-have-to-learn-new-tricks-to-survive/122176 "To Preserve Santa Monica Civic Auditorium, Revise Specific Plan, Says Expert Panel" -- 5/13/13 -- Santa Monica Lookout -- http://www.surfsantamonica.com/ssm_site/the_lookout/news/News2013/May2013/05_13_2013_To_Preserve_Santa_Monica_Civic_Auditorium_Revise_Specific_Plan_Says_Exp ert_Panel.html
"Curtains for the Civic" -- 5/19/13 -- Santa Monica Daily Press -- http://smdp.com/curtains-for-thecivic/122417 Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1043 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 89 Mitchell Kois
From: Nicole Picard <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 5:21 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: RE: Item 11C Approval to extend ENA with RPG for six-months

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and Council Members,
Please extend the original Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) with RPG for six months to allow completion of the financial analysis and negotiations for the restoration of the landmark Santa Monica Civic Auditorium. The proposed state-of-the-art facility will be an important asset for the City’s performing arts, culture, finances, and reputation.

Your support of this request is greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,
Nicole Picard
Picard Productions
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1044 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 90 Mitchell Kois
From: Richard Orton <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 5:14 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Save the Civic Auditorium it is a unique treasure

Sanat Monica has had a Civic Auditorium going back to 1912 when the first one was built at the Ocean Park Pier. Keep this tradition ongoing.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1045 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 91 Your support of this request is greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,
Richard Orton
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1046 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 92 Mitchell Kois
From: June Stoddard <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 5:10 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: 11C- SAVE THE CIVIC-Support for RPG and City to revitalize the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
RE: (Item 11C)
City Council and City Manager,
I urge you to continue the negotiations with RPG so that our city can have a fully restored, state-of-the-art, Civic Auditorium. Santa Monica deserves nothing less.

Publicly owned venues for music and the arts are rare and important and should not be sold off or used for other purposes.

The fate of our historic Civic rests with you. RPG has conducted due diligence and prepared preliminary plans for an exciting world-class performing arts center at NO cost to taxpayers.

By proposing a futuristic, exciting immersive experience, the Civic will attract a new generation of residents and worldwide visitors, producing new revenue for our businesses and enhancing our city’s destination status.

I urge you to continue to negotiate in good faith with RPG. Ending discussions now would be a missed opportunity and a huge loss for Santa Monica.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1047 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 93 Please listen,
June
--
June Stoddard
310-721-4121 c
[email protected]
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1048 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 94 Mitchell Kois
From: Nancy Morse <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 4:34 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis; Oliver Chi
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
To: Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium From: Nancy Morse
Dear Mayor Negrete, City Councilmembers, and City Manager, Please conƟnue the negoƟaƟons with RevitalizaƟon Partners Group (RPG) to restore the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium.

RPG has presented a design concept that will make this historic building once again be a state-of-the-art venue for music and the arts, and help restore Santa Monica’s reputaƟon as a performance desƟnaƟon.

The Auditorium is public owned and should not be sold off or used for other purposes.

As a performance desƟnaƟon, it will bring income to Santa Monica, and businesses in the area.

Please extend the ENA agreement to allow RPG the Ɵme needed to properly validate this project. To not do so would be foolish and a tremendous loss to all.

Sincerely,
Nancy Morse
90404
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1049 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 95 Mitchell Kois
From: Gay <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 4:25 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: RE: Item 11C Approval to extend ENA with RPG for six-months

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
Please extend the original Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) with RPG for six months to allow completion of the financial analysis and negotiations for the restoration of the landmark Santa Monica Civic Auditorium. The proposed state-of-the-art facility will be an important asset for the City%2��s performing arts, culture, finances, and reputation.

Your support of this request is greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,
Gay L Parrish, Los Angeles/Preservationist
Sent from AOL on Android
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1050 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 96 Mitchell Kois
From: Jay Sloofman <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 4:20 PM
To: Lana Negrete
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Save+the+Civic

EXTERNAL
The opening of a homeless shelter for individuals with mental illness at 413/425 Ocean Avenue in Santa Monica is a disasterious idea for the community. The proposed locaƟon is alarmingly at the heart of residenƟal neighborhoods, an elementary school, and Palisades Park. This proximity raises safety concerns for all, especially children and elderly residents.

The proposed site is near a protected green space that serves as a vital ecological and recreaƟonal asset for the community. This facility will negaƟvely impact the safety and enjoyment of the area.

I urge the decision-makers to consider alternaƟve sites that are beƩer suited for a homeless/mental illness facility.

LocaƟons further from dense residenƟal areas and sensiƟve environmental zones should be prioriƟzed.

While the establishment of a facility like this is undoubtedly essenƟal, it is crucial to choose a locaƟon that respects the needs and concerns of the community it serves.

H. Jay Sloofman
516 San Vicente Blvd.

Unit 307
Santa Monica, CA 90402
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1051 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 1 Mitchell Kois
From: Heather Thomason <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 11:59 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Cc: Oliver Chi
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,
I am writing to express my strong support for the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium restoration project led by Revitalization Partners Group (RPG) and to respectfully urge you to extend the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) by six months.

Given the scale and significance of this project, it’s essential to allocate sufficient time to ensure excellence. The proposed six-month extension represents a modest yet vital investment in delivering outcomes that will both respect Santa Monica’s history and define its path forward.

A restored historic concert venue bringing world-class musical acts to our city would be an ideal anchor for downtown revitalization. The location is exceptional: a short walk from the Expo line terminus, making it accessible via public transit to residents across the LA region. When this kind of connectivity comes to a possible major cultural site without having to create the public transportation, we must take advantage of it.

I am concerned that if we don’t grant this extension to RPG, that will mean Council is looking at another use entirely for the site. And while I understand some of the ostensible merits of at least some of these other options, I feel strongly that the concert venue offers unique advantages:
• Hotel development: We already have hotel capacity in Santa Monica. What we need is a compelling reason for visitors to fill those existing rooms. A major performance venue would drive tourism and support our current hospitality businesses. • Housing: While I strongly support deed-restricted affordable housing in Santa Monica, this particular site offers a rare opportunity to preserve historic architecture while creating a cultural destination that benefits the entire community. (I also enthusiastically support Save the Civic’s proposal to include a ticket fee directed toward a reparations fund for those in the Belmar community who were displaced during earlier parts of Santa Monica history in order to build the civic, and I hope this can be incorporated into the final plan.)
• School district sports facility: While our schools absolutely deserve adequate recreational space, limiting this prominent downtown location to exclusive use for our high school would be a missed opportunity. The broader community deserves access to this civic asset, and the economic benefits— Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1052 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 2 visitors dining, shopping, and exploring a revitalized Third Street Promenade—would strengthen our entire city. I could also imagine the school getting some kind of unique access to the Civic auditorium in the scenario when it becomes a restored performance space.

On a personal note: As a parent of two small children, getting across town for live music has become nearly impossible. This venue would be transformative for Westside residents who face similar constraints. Access to live music and cultural experiences shouldn’t require hours of travel time—this project would bring that vitality to our own community.

The Council has granted extensions in other circumstances—including, very recently, multi-year extensions for developers on affordable housing requirements that I frankly questioned—but a six-month extension for this massive cultural project is both modest and well-justified.

This is a rare opportunity to revitalize downtown, restore Santa Monica’s reputation as a performance destination, and generate economic activity our city needs. We have much to gain by allowing RPG additional time to complete this work, and little to lose by granting this extension.

Thank you for your consideration.

Heather Thomason
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1053 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 3 Mitchell Kois
From: Carol Lemlein <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 11:58 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete
Subject: RE: Item 11C Approval to extend ENA with RPG for six months Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and Council Members,
We strongly support the extension of the ENA with RPG for six months RPG is a capable sponsor with large-scale entertainment venue experience providing programming for the current market. It is committed to preservation of the existing historic structure in a way that meets the needs of the entertainment market and qualifies the National Register property for historic tax credits.

A six month extension of the ENA will
 provide time to refine the proposal and respond to public suggestions and concerns. and
 provide additional data demonstrating not only the feasibility of its proposal but also its very positive impact on the Santa Monica economy without additional public funding.

We urge you to support the extension of the ENA.

Sincerely,
Carol Lemlein and Eric Natwig
Long-time Sunset Park residents
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1054 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 4 Mitchell Kois
From: Thea Phillips <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 11:57 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi; Council Mailbox Subject: Support Agenda Item 11-C
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
I request that the City Council extend the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) for the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium restoration project as requested by Revitalization Partners Group (RPG).

The following are impressive and important aspects to the proposal:

RPG commits that their proposal will require no City money or bonds, but to financing the project on its own.

A new park is planned on the site of the existing parking lot, adding green open space.

Thank you,
Thea Phillips
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1055 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 5 Mitchell Kois
From: George Ferrell <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 11:56 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: Extend ENA Agreement
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Santa Monica Council Members:

We support extending the ENA agreement to allow RPG time to complete their proposal. This is a common-sense, no-cost project that preserves our history and will stimulate business.

Peggy and George Ferrell
Extending the ENA agreement by 6 months will allow RPG the time needed to complete essential detailed cost estimates and financial feasibility studies. This additional time has been requested to structure a sound lease agreement and minimize downstream surprises in this complex, multimillion-dollar project.

The following are impressive and important aspects to the proposal:

RPG commits that their proposal will require no City money or bonds, but to financing the project on its own.

A new park is planned on the site of the existing parking lot, adding green open space.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1056 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 6 Mitchell Kois
From: Info Save the Civic <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 11:55 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Oliver Chi; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya
Subject: Item 11C. Support for six month extension for ENA Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
City Council and City Manager,

Residents have worked tirelessly for two years to bring our Civic Auditorium back to life.

Miraculously, we found a suiter capable of doing exactly that at no cost to Santa Monica or its taxpayers.

This is a project that will inspire a wholecommunity—a chance to do something great and return a cultural icon to use, expertly restored with all the amenities of a world-class performing arts center.

The Civic has sat idle for over a decade. When its history is written, will anyone care that it took an extra six months for RPG to provide its financials?

Might we really look back and say, the industry leaders who stepped forward to restore the Civic to its full glory, asked forsix more months to provide their financialsso instead we demolished it.

We urge you to do the right thing and give
RPG the extension it seeks.

Thank you.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1057 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 7 Save the Civic Steering Committee

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1058 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 8 Mitchell Kois
From: Susan Potter <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 11:54 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: RE: Item 11C Approval to extend ENA with RPG for six-months Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

Your support of this request is greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,
Susan Gabriel PoƩer
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1059 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 9 Mitchell Kois
From: Katharine Dreyfuss <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 11:53 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Support agenda item 11-C (1/14/25)
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Hello, Councilmembers:

Please resist the effort of Santa Monica Forward to discourage your plan to extend the ENA for the Civic Auditorium. Our city still needs this structure.

Thank you for supporting Agenda Item 11-C.

Best,
Katharine Dreyfuss
621 25th Street
Santa Monica, CA 90402
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1060 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 10 Mitchell Kois
From: Darrell Clarke <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 11:53 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: RE: Item 11C Approval to extend ENA with RPG for six-months Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

Your support of this request is greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,
Darrell Clarke
Santa Monica Planning Commissioner 1999-2007
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1061 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 11 Mitchell Kois
From: Melina Mae Castorillo <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 11:50 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Item 11C Approval to extend ENA with RPG for six-months Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

Your support of this request is greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,
Melina Castorillo
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1062 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 12 Mitchell Kois
From: Clerk Mailbox
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 11:46 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: FW: Extending the ENA with RPG (Item 11C)
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Mitchell Kois
Staff Assistant III | City Clerk’s Office
(310) 458-8211 x5518
From: Michelle Edgar <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 11:45 AM
To: Lana Negrete <[email protected]>; Dan Hall <[email protected]>; Caroline Torosis <[email protected]>; Natalya Zernitskaya <[email protected]>; Ellis Raskin <[email protected]>; Barry Snell <[email protected]>; Jesse Zwick <[email protected]>; Council Mailbox <[email protected]>; Clerk Mailbox <[email protected]>
Subject: Extending the ENA with RPG (Item 11C)

EXTERNAL
Subject: Restoring the Soul of Santa Monica: Support for the Civic Auditorium Dear Council Members,
As a member of the Santa Monica Arts Commission, I write with deep conviction to encourage you to extend the ENA period with RPG for an additional 180 days.

The Civic Auditorium is more than a building — it is the cultural heartbeat of our city. From its historic stage that once united generations through music and community, to its architectural integrity that continues to inspire, this space stands as a beacon of Santa Monica’s creative identity.

With over 10+ years in the music and entertainment industry — working across major record labels, talent agencies, and cultural institutions — I have witnessed first-hand how venues like the Civic serve as catalysts for creativity, community engagement, and economic revitalization. The leadership and vision that RPG brings to the table reflect the kind of expertise, passion, and partnership required to restore the Civic to its rightful place as a cornerstone of Santa Monica’s cultural ecosystem.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1063 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 13 These are the right partners, at the right time, to bring this historic space back to life. Our community needs it - not just as a stage for performance, but as a gathering place for inspiration, education, and connection.

In this moment, when so much of our world feels fragmented, we have the opportunity to lead with imagination - to restore not just a building, but the very soul of our city. Let’s give RPG the time and partnership they need to finish what they started and allow the Civic to rise once again.

Thank you in advance for your time and here to be of service for whatever else you might need. I can be reached at 847-334-2753
Kind Regards,
Michelle Edgar
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1064 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 14 Mitchell Kois
From: Alisa Becket <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 11:45 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: Support for RPG and City of SM to continue the process to revitalize the Civic Auditorium (Item 11C)
Importance: High
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members and City Manager Oliver Chi,
My grandfather, Welton Becket designed the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium, which opened in 1958. As you know, the Civic holds significant cultural, architectural, and historical importance, especially in Southern California’s entertainment history. A prime example of mid-century modern civic architecture, blending sleek lines, large open interior spaces, and innovative engineering, the Civic was fortunately designated a City Landmark by Santa Monica in April 2002. Not only is the building itself, historically significant, but was also a cultural and entertainment landmark and became one of Southern California’s premier venues for concerts, film premieres, and award shows.

My grandfather, designed the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium not just as a building, but as a living, breathing symbol of community. He wanted it to be what he called a “people’s auditorium”, a place where everyone could come together, whether for concerts, school graduations, conventions, or celebrations that marked the rhythm of civic life and for the general public. When it opened in 1958, he described it as a space that “belongs to the city, but more importantly, to the people,” reflecting his belief that architecture should serve both beauty and purpose. He engineered the auditorium with an innovative hydraulic floor that could transform the hall from a theater to a ballroom or exhibition space, allowing it to adapt as the city evolved. The building’s sweeping modernist lines and glass facades were not just for style, they were meant to express openness, optimism, and connection in a postwar world hungry for progress. Today, as we fight to preserve the Civic Auditorium’s future, I think about his vision: a cultural heart for Santa Monica that bridges art, architecture, and community. To lose this place would be to lose part of our city’s soul, and a piece of my grandfather’s enduring dream for what public spaces could mean.

I urge you to extend negotiations with RPG, who have thoughtfully designed a plan to restore, enhance and reopen the Civic Auditorium, bringing it back to the public. Their vision, funding and forward momentum will bring the building back to what it was meant for - to celebrate the arts and bring the community together. Please help our city and make the decision to continue the process to restore my grandfathers original idea of the building and to give Santa Monica back its own cultural heart — a venue for the people blending art, entertainment, and civic life.

Thank you,
Alisa Becket
Los Angeles, CA
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1065 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 15 Mitchell Kois
From: Clerk Mailbox
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 11:41 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: FW: A Letter From The Creation and Parks Commission Re: Civic Auditorium Attachments: 10_14_25 Council Item 11 C Recreation and Parks Commission Letter To Council Re The Civic Auditorium.pdf; 10_28_24 Recreation & Parks Commission and the Civic Auditorium.pdf; 09_28_23 - Recreation and Parks Commission Letter To Council Re The Civic Auditorium.pdf
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Mitchell Kois
Staff Assistant III | City Clerk’s Office
(310) 458-8211 x5518
From: Noe Mendoza <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 5:42 PM
To: Council Mailbox <[email protected]>; Lana Negrete <[email protected]>; Caroline Torosis <[email protected]>; Jesse Zwick <[email protected]>; Dan Hall <[email protected]>; Ellis Raskin <[email protected]>; Barry Snell <[email protected]>; Natalya Zernitskaya <[email protected]> Cc: Clerk Mailbox <[email protected]>; Santa Monica City Manager's Office <[email protected]>; Jenny Rogers <[email protected]>; Micah Akerson <[email protected]>; Steven Johnson <[email protected]>; Maryanne LaGuardia <[email protected]>; John Smith <[email protected]>; Barry Rosenbaum <[email protected]>; Ann Bowman <[email protected]>; Sonam Makker <[email protected]>; Karen Melick <[email protected]> Subject: A Letter From The Creation and Parks Commission Re: Civic Auditorium Hello esteemed Council Members and City Manager,
I hope you had a wonderful weekend!
I have attached to this email a letter from the Recreation and Parks Commission re: City Council Agenda Item 11.C (10/14/25), Approval of First Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement with Revitalization Partners Group, LLC for the Civic Center Auditorium Renovation, Programming and Operation.

Also attached are letters previously sent by the Commission regarding the Civic Auditorium.

Thank you and have a wonderful rest of your day!
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1066 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 16 Noe Mendoza
Staff Assistant III
santamonica.gov
Facebook | Twitter | Instagram
Subscribe to City of Santa Monica Email Updates
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1067 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) Recreation and Parks Commission
September 28, 2023
Mayor and City Council Members
City of Santa Monica
1685 Main Street,
Santa Monica, CA 90401
Re: The Civic Auditorium
Dear Mayor Davis and City Council members:

We emphasize that the Commission is against the City selling the Auditorium to any third party, including to the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District (SMMUSD), for any purpose.

We highlight the significant input provided by the community over several decades in the Civic Center Specific Plan (CCSP), which is the governing planning document for the Civic Center area. The Auditorium is the centerpiece of the CCSP and historically has been the community's most significant venue for civic and public life. We also call your attention to the many hours of community input that informed the Civic Working Group (CWG) process in 2014-2015, which is reflected in the CWG Report dated November 2015, presented to Council in February 2016.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1068 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) The then-Chair of the Recreation and Parks Commission was among the nine members appointed by Council to the CWG, along with appointees from the Arts, Planning, and Landmarks Commissions.

Over 1,700 individuals, most of whom resided or worked in the City at that time, provided input during the CWG process and per the CWG Report (page 20) "[t]he overwhelming public response...reflected a desire to maintain the Civic for performing arts and cultural uses".

Further, the Commission recognizes recent public sentiments expressed at Council, School Board, and other public community meetings in strong support of maintaining the Auditorium exclusively as a civic asset in perpetuity.

Accordingly, we advise Council to end negotiations with SMMUSD under the Surplus Land Act as soon as legally possible and suggest this process move forward quickly enough to preserve the possibility of a reopening in conjunction with the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics.

The Recreation and Parks Commission looks forward to working with City Council, Staff and the community to revitalize the Auditorium as a civic, cultural, and performance venue.

Sincerely,
Santa Monica Recreation and Parks Commission
Maryanne LaGuardia, Chair
Andrew Gomez, Vice Chair
Lori Brown
John Cyrus Smith
Arati Desai Wagabaza
Steven Johnson
Ann Bowman
Cc: David White, City Manager
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1069 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 1685 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401 • (310) 458-8411 • [email protected] santamonica.gov • @cityofsantamonica • @santamonicacity Monday, October 13, 2025
Re: City Council Agenda Item 11.C (10/14/25), Approval of First Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement with Revitalization Partners Group, LLC for the Civic Center Auditorium Renovation, Programming and Operation
Dear Mayor Negrete and Esteemed Councilmembers,
The Recreation & Parks Commissioners voted at our September 25 meeting to write this letter to express our continued support of pursuing a robust partnership that will restore and reopen the historic Santa Monica Civic Auditorium as our city’s most significant venue for civic and public life, and as a performance venue we can all be proud of.

Attached are past letters from the Commission that highlight our consistent defense of the Civic, and note the substantial community input and broad public support for the facility going back decades, from the creation of the Civic Center Specific Plan of 2005 to the Civic Working Group process over 2013-2014, all the way through to our support of the ENA that is in place today with Revitalization Partners Group (RPG).

Recent enthusiasm for early design presentations from RPG continues to reflect the public’s interest in seeing this cultural icon revitalized at the heart of our City.

The RPC looks forward to seeing Council and Staff continue to make progress towards this widely supported and eminently worthy community goal.

Sincerely,
City of Santa Monica Recreation & Parks Commission
Steven Johnson, Chair
Maryanne LaGuardia, Vice Chair
John Cyrus Smith
Ann K. Bowman
Barry Rosenbaum
Karen Melick
Sonam Makker
cc: Oliver Chi, Jenny Rogers, Micah Akerson, Noe Mendoza Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1070 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 1 of 2
Monday, February 10, 2025 at 09:50:52 Pacific Standard Time Monday, February 10, 2025 at 09:50:52 Pacific Standard Time Monday, February 10, 2025 at 09:50:52 Pacific Standard Time Subject:Subject:Subject:Subject: Recreation & Parks Commission and the Civic Auditorium Date:Date:Date: Tuesday, May 28, 2024 at 10:40:54AM Pacific Daylight Time From:From:From: Steven Johnson
To:To:To: councilmtgitems
CC:CC:CC: Jenny Rogers, David White, Phil Brock, Christine Parra, Lana Negrete, Oscar de la Torre, Jesse Zwick, Gleam Davis, Caroline Torosis, Ann Bowman, Lori Brown, Arati Desai Wagabaza, Maryanne LaGuardia, John Smith, Andrew Gomez, Noe Mendoza, Jennifer Taylor, Nia Tang Attachments: Attachments: Attachments: image001.png, Recreation and Parks Commission Letter To Council Re The Civic Auditorium.pdf Dear Mayor Brock, Mr. White, and Esteemed Councilmembers:

Pursuant to the directive outlined in Article X, Section 1014 of the City Charter (Recreation and Parks Commission. Powers and duties.) with respect to all matters pertaining to public recreation, including playgrounds, music and entertainment, our Commission (RPC) voted unanimously on September 19, 2023 in support of the City retaining ownership of the Civic Auditorium and the RPC submitted a letter to you dated September 28, 2023 (copycopy attachedattachedattachedattached) in which we highlighted the significant input provided by the community over several decades in favor of revitalizing the Auditorium, which historically has been the community's most significant venue for civic and public life.

The letter also spotlighted for Council that during the Civic Working Group (CWG) process (2013-2014) over 1,700 individuals, most of whom resided or worked in the City at that time, provided input during the process and per the CWG Report (page 20) "[t]he overwhelming public response...reflected a desire to maintain the Civic for performing arts and cultural uses".

Further, in our September 28, 2023 letter we recognized the most recent public sentiments expressed at Council and other public community meetings in strong support of maintaining the Auditorium exclusively as a civic asset in perpetuity.

We are gratified to see that this community hope and goal may be advanced tonight in Closed Session Item 4.D. The RPC looks forward to working with Council, Staf, Revitalization Partners Group, LLC, and the community to restore and reopen the Auditorium as a civic, cultural, and performance venue.

Sincerely,
Recreation and Parks Commission
Steven Johnson, Chair
Andrew Gomez, Vice Chair
Maryanne LaGuardia
Lori Brown
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1071 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 2 of 2
John C. Smith
Arati Desai Wagabaza
Ann K. Bowman
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1072 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 17 Mitchell Kois
From: Laura Kachergus <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 11:40 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely,
Laura Kachergus
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1073 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 18 Mitchell Kois
From: Elizabeth Lerer <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 11:34 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Lana Negrete; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Oliver Chi
Subject: Item 11.C. Civic - vote for 6 month extension! Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and Council Members,
Please extend negoƟaƟons with RPG for six months.

Thank you,
Elizabeth Lerer
Resident
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1074 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 19 Mitchell Kois
From: D'Orsogna, Maria R <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 11:29 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Why do Developers Want to Kill the Civic?
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear all,
I don't know if this is true, but if it is shame on Santa Monica Forward.

Please do the right thing and approve of the project to restore the Civic Auditorium tonight, on October 14th without delay and without turning the location into a hotel, apartments, or a mental health institute.

Shame on Santa Monica Forward.

Maria
From: Save the Civic <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 2:22 PM
To: D'Orsogna, Maria R <[email protected]>
Subject: Why do Developers Want to Kill the Civic?

Can't see this message? View in browser
Save the Civic
To help
protect your
privacy,
Micro so ft
Office
prevented
auto matic
download of
this picture
from the
Internet.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1075 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 20 October 12, 2025

Dear Friend of the Civic Auditorium,

The developer group Santa Monica Forward — which advocates for more development, everywhere, all the time — just released a hit piece saying Santa Monica “deserves better” than a fullyrestored Civic Auditorium at NO COST TO TAXPAYERS.

They falsely claim that making a deal with the very creditable industry leaders who want to restore the Civic (RPG) would somehow cost Santa Monica money. But the fact is, RPG has already committed to financing the rehab and operation of the Civic 100%. And as we’re pretty sure SMForward knows, that commitment would be put in writing when the City negotiates and signs a contract with RPG.

SMForward also pretends that if the City walks away from this deal, Santa Monica could simply find another suitor for the project.

Having spent years looking for such a suiter, Save the Civic knows this is, at best, magical thinking.

More likely, Forward knows what we know: if the City blows this opportunity, the Civic will likely sit abandoned a few more years — removed from landmark status (as Forward proposes!) — and replaced with what Forward really wants and even suggests in its hit piece: “hotel development” or “mixed-use”.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1076 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 21 Killing the Civic advances developers’ dystopian dreams — where every corner, every neighborhood, every street in Santa Monica has either a hotel or massive mixed-used
building — a homogeneous landscape that replaces
everything unique in our city.

It’s no mystery what developers want for our Civic
Auditorium. The only mystery is why on earth our city would give it to them.

Santa Monica “deserves better” than allowing special interests to decide which cultural landmarks live or die.

We’re closer than ever to a fully restore Civic Auditorium at NO COST TO TAXPAYERS. Let’s make it happen!

Save the Civic Steering Committee
https://www.savethecivic.org

If you haven’t already, please visit our website: savethecivic.org and register your contact information so we can notify you with updates or when action is needed. .
[email protected]
Share on social
To help
protect
your
privacy,
Microso
ft Office
prevent
ed
automa
tic
downlo
ad of
this
Check out our site
T
o
h
e
l
p
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
This email was sent from this site.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1077 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 22 If you no longer wish to receive this email, change your email preferences here.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1078 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 23 Mitchell Kois
From: Robert Wright <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 11:29 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Support for a restored Civic Auditorium
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
I’m very much in support of RPG’s vision for a restored Civic Auditorium. Please approve!
Robert Wright
Santa Monica
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1079 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 24 Mitchell Kois
From: D'Orsogna, Maria R <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 11:36 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Re: Why do Developers Want to Kill the Civic?
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
More on this - please do the right thing tonight.

Santa Monica Forward does NOT represent the best interests of residents. They represent capital. Their agenda isn’t inclusion, equity, or sustainability as they claim — it’s deregulated development for profit. ----
Tim Sexton is here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Sexton
and here are his statements:
"We are not asking, and never have asked for a penny. We're not asking for any money from the city, nor any subsidy from the city,"
Sexton emphasized the team's personal connection to the venue and questioned why the city would terminate negotiations when no alternative exists.
"That's where we did some of our earliest and most famous shows,” Sexton said. “One of the most famous ever, of course, is the Eagles live album, which was recorded in Santa Monica Civic." He called the consortium's assembled expertise rare and valuable. "This array of people in RPG doesn't grow on trees, you know, to have this group of people all together wanting to save the Santa Monica Civic, and not only save it, but make it an important 21st Century destination for not only West Side citizens and the citizens of Santa Monica, but for people all over the world," Sexton said.
https://smdp.com/uncategorized/hopeful-saviors-of-the-civic-challenge-city-analysis-of-revitalization-plan/ Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1080 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 25 Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1081 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 26 Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 11:24 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Nina Fresco
Subject: Santa Monica Civic Auditorium, Item 11C
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear City Council,
Save the Civic. A lot of things have changed in Santa Monica and many more will have to change to accommodate the differences. Changes in city policy and direction have to be made ethically and holistically. Obviously housing, community development, and economic growth are critical but without the context of cultural heritage, well-being, local identity, aesthetics, vibrancy, and livability, we are sunk.

Saving the Civic Auditorium is a perfect opportunity for holistic planning and governance. The concept drawings we have seen prove that this iconic historic structure can simultaneously accommodate an event facility of the future and remain a uniquely Santa Monica attraction.

It took the city decades to finally approve DAs for the Miramar and Geary projects. Those developers stuck it out year after year as city councils changed and the range of demands on their projects were constantly in flux. This project is asking the city to wait a few extra months, not years or decades. If we can close the deal with this deep-pocketed consortium, it promises to result in a fully baked project with shovels in the ground in short order, an elusive goal these days.

Please see it through.

Let’s not abandon the Civic Auditorium to seek some imagined “highest and best use” for the site instead. This term refers to the up-front profit margins of developers and is not an ethical standard for cities which must think about profits over time in terms of money but also community values. Profits to cities come from the effects of development and the venue proposal that is still evolving appears to strive to deliver community as well as economic benefits in spades.

To say it doesn’t pencil out based on the information you have so far is inappropriate. The city has long since acknowledged that it should not be in the entertainment venue business. Let the experts do the calculations.

We have numerous sites suitable for large amounts of housing in the city and only one Civic Auditorium. To nonetheless scrap this project and turn the site into housing will take years of SLA Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1082 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 27 processes and RFPs to begin and could end up in a stalled project like so many other housing projects in town. As for hotels, after the same processing delays there is no telling if our flow of visitors will increase enough to fill another hotel in time. And, we still have the Miramar and the Geary projects in the pipeline and very few tourists.

Before you, is the first half of a proposal from the world leaders in entertainment venues, a fastgrowing industry. They are proposing to invest hundreds of millions of dollars in our city, asking only for a place to do it. Why harass them over a longer timeline at the front end to create the proposal? From them, we will get an attraction that will increase Santa Monicas revenue streams continuously for a generation and reinvigorate our local economy in ways other uses can’t. It’s nerve wreaking to make a deal with a consortium of corporations so much bigger than the city government itself. Please be bold and bring the Civic Auditorium, and along with it the City of Santa Monica, back to life.

Sincerely,
Nina Fresco
(on her own behalf)
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1083 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 28 Mitchell Kois
From: Jennifer Schab <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 11:14 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: Please Save the Civic Auditorium
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Letter to Council in anticipation of the
October 14, 2025 Meeting
Date: 10/14/2025
To: [email protected]
cc: [email protected], [email protected]
RE: Support for RPG and City to continue the process to revitalize the Civic Auditorium (Item 11C)
City Council and City Manager,
I urge you to continue the negotiations with RPG so that our city can have a fully restored, state-of-the-art, Civic Auditorium. Santa Monica deserves nothing less.

Publicly owned venues for music and the arts are rare and important and should not be sold off or used for other purposes.

The fate of our historic Civic rests with you. RPG has conducted due diligence and prepared preliminary plans for an exciting world-class performing arts center at NO cost to taxpayers.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1084 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 29 And by proposing a futuristic, exciting immersive experience, the Civic will attract a new generation of residents and worldwide visitors, producing new revenue for our businesses and enhancing our city’s destination status.

I urge you to continue to negotiate in good faith with RPG. Ending discussions now would be a tragic missed opportunity and a huge loss for all of us.

Thank you.
--
Jennifer Schab
713 Ashland Avenue, Santa Monica, CA 90405
310 663 9482
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1085 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 30 Mitchell Kois
From: John Murdock <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 11:12 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: ENA for Civic
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Please vote to grant the 6-month extension.

Thank you,
John Murdock
1209 Pine Street
Santa Monica, CA 90405
tel. (310) 450-1859
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1086 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 31 Mitchell Kois
From: Connor Webb <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 11:02 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Ellis Raskin; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell
Subject: 11C: Please Reimagine the Civic Auditorium for Public Good Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and Councilmembers,
Santa Monica faces a serious budget crisis, yet the City is being asked to consider a development proposal that would worsen our financial position. I urge you to terminate the Exclusive Negotiation Agreement with RPG for the Civic Auditorium and pursue an open, competitive process that truly serves the public interest.

Staff analysis shows RPG’s proposal would require a large public subsidy and produce little revenue for the City. Even under optimistic assumptions, the project runs a $25 million deficit, and the gap is $120 million under more realistic projections. Despite this, RPG would pay the City only $1 per year for control of prime downtown land worth tens of millions of dollars.

RPG is now asking for an extension to the ENA, despite failing to provide documentation like financial plans, operating projections, more advanced design, etc. I personally have little faith in RPG’s ability to deliver anything close to the project that Santa Monica deserves. The Civic Auditorium is one of Santa Monica’s most valuable public assets, and we need to utilize that asset for the public good by creating a space that benefits the coming generations of Santa Monicans, not hand it over to a private developer under unfavorable terms that will further burden our budget and negatively impact public services for years to come.

I urge the City Council to take four key actions:

1. Remove the Civic Auditorium’s landmark status, which has limited redevelopment options and kept the site vacant for more than a decade.

2. End the ENA with RPG immediately.

3. Issue a new RFP with two tracks-- one for adaptive reuse and one for new redevelopment-- to explore all viable options and allow us to determine what will result in the best project for the public.

4. Adopt a land value capture strategy using ground leases that maintains City ownership of the property and generates meaningful ongoing revenue to support essential city services.

With this, the City can consider a wider range of possibilities for one of our most prized assets: a modern performance venue, a convention center or event space, a hotel, a mixed-use project including housing, or a combination of those uses. Through competition and transparency, Santa Monica can identify the best use that benefits residents and strengthens the City’s finances.

Sincerely,
Connor Webb
Mid-City/ 90404
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1087 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 32 Mitchell Kois
From: Jane Bordal <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 11:01 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Save the Civic
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Good morning,
I’m a resident adding my voice to those hopeful we can save the historic Santa Monica Civic Center and bring back the music. Please prioriƟze this goal over other uses for that space! Thanks for your efforts to resolve this complicated issue — without sacrificing an important landmark and cultural venue.

Sincerely,
Jane Bordal
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1088 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 1 Mitchell Kois
From: Russell Bjorkman <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 5:25 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Nia Tang; Jennifer Taylor Subject: October 14, 2025 Council Meeting - Item 11.C. - Civic Auditorium

Thank you for understanding that this is a one-time-only opportunity now for our City and that the community continues to value deeply having a Civic Center with the Auditorium as its centerpiece.

Sincerely,
Russell Bjorkman
Russell Bjorkman
[email protected]
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1089 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 2 Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 5:21 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Nia Tang; Jennifer Taylor Subject: October 14, 2025 Council Meeting - Item 11.C. - Civic Auditorium

My husband and I just drove past there yesterday and were wondering what is happening with the revitalization plan ... and today i read that RPG is requesting more time to quantify the economic benefits. Please give them this time and hopefully we can bring back the Civic as a vibrant entertainment venue in our city.

Thank you for understanding that this is a ONE-TIME-ONLY opportunity now for our City and that the community continues to value deeply having a Civic Center with the Auditorium as its centerpiece.

Sincerely,
Rebecca Terlizzi
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1090 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 3 Mitchell Kois
From: Nicole Widmyer <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 5:00 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Nia Tang; Jennifer Taylor Subject: Civic Center Proposal

Thank you for understanding that this is a ONE-TIME-ONLY opportunity now for our City and that the community continues to deeply value having a Civic Center with the Auditorium as its centerpiece.

Sincerely,
Nicole Widmyer, Santa Monica Resident, and Samohi parent Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1091 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 4 Mitchell Kois
From: Pamela Mayes <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 4:23 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Nia Tang; Jennifer Taylor Subject: Exclusive Negotiating Agreement with Revitalization Partners Group (RPG) to revive and operate the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium.

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and Councilmembers,
Please approve a 6-month extension of the ENA with RPG, and ask RPG to return with a fully-developed proposal and financing plan at the end of that period.

Thank you for understanding that this is a ONE-TIME-ONLY opportunity now for our City and that the community continues to value deeply having a Civic Center with the Auditorium as its centerpiece.

Sincerely,
Pamela Mayes
(310)903-8593
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1092 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 5 Mitchell Kois
From: Pamela Mayes <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 4:22 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Nia Tang; Jennifer Taylor Subject: Exclusive Negotiating Agreement with Revitalization Partners Group (RPG) to revive and operate the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium.

Thank you for understanding that this is a ONE-TIME-ONLY opportunity now for our City and that the community continues to value deeply having a Civic Center with the Auditorium as its centerpiece.

Sincerely,
Pamela Mayes
(310)903-8593
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1093 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 6 Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 4:12 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi; Caroline Torosis; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell Subject: Santa Monica Civic Auditorium

Your support of this request is greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,
Deborah Mego

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1094 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 7 Mitchell Kois
From: Julie Millett <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 4:07 PM
To: [email protected]; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; [email protected]; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; councilmtgitems Cc: Oliver Chi; Nia Tang; Jennifer Taylor
Subject: October 14, 2025 Council Meeting - Item 11.C - Civic Auditorium

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and Councilmembers:

Please approve a very much needed 6-month extension of the ENA with RPG, and direct RPG to return with a fullydeveloped proposal and financing plan at the end of that period.

This is a ONE TIME ONLY opportunity for our City. Your community consƟtuents conƟnue to deeply value having a Santa Monica City Center with the Auditorium as its centerpiece.

Sincerely,

JULIE MILLETT
27-year Santa Monica resident
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1095 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 8 Mitchell Kois
From: Marthawked <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 4:01 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Save the civic

EXTERNAL
RE: October 14, 2025 Council Meeting - Item 11.C. - Civic Auditorium Dear Mayor Negrete and Councilmembers -
Please approve a 6-month extension of the ENA with RPG, and ask RPG to return with a fullydeveloped proposal and financing plan at the end of that period.

Thank you for understanding that this is a ONE-TIME-ONLY opportunity now for our City and that the community continues to value deeply having a Civic Center with the Auditorium as its centerpiece.

Sincerely,
Martha Burr
Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1096 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 9 Mitchell Kois
From: Regina O'Brien <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 3:47 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Santa Monica Civic

The Santa Monica Civic is a Modernist Masterpiece with lasting Architectural and Cultural legacy. I went to many a show there as a young person, and often championed as the Chairperson of the Modern Committee (ModCom) of the Los Angeles Conservancy.

Restoring it to a venue is a perfect use of the space, and I hope very much for the sake of our City that the current plans can be realized.

Your support of this request is greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,
Regina O'Brien Wronske
--
Regina O'Brien Wronske
213-910-9163
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1097 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 10 Mitchell Kois
From: Patricia Meyer <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 3:41 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Nia Tang; Jennifer Taylor Subject: October 14, 2025 Council Meeting - Item 11.C. - Civic Auditorium

Thank you for understanding that this is a ONE-TIME-ONLY opportunity now for our City and that the community continues to value deeply having a Civic Center with the Auditorium as its centerpiece.

Sincerely,
Patricia K. Meyer
Writer/Producer
Assistant Professor
Screenwriting
School of Film & Television
Loyola Marymount University
Mobile: (310)968-4044
Website: patriciakmeyer.net
Podcast: Daughters & their Fathers: It's Complicated
podcast.patriciakmeyer.net
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1098 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 11 Mitchell Kois
From: Amy Wilkes <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 3:37 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Nia Tang; Jennifer Taylor Subject: RE: October 14, 2025 Council Meeting - Item 11.C. - Civic Auditorium

Thank you for understanding that this is a ONE-TIME-ONLY opportunity now for our City and that the community continues to value deeply having a Civic Center with the Auditorium as its centerpiece.

Sincerely,
Amy Wilkes

AMY WILKES
Estate Director
m: 310.980.4406
CalBRE#: 02043267
2115 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1099 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 12 Mitchell Kois
From: Katharine Dreyfuss <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 2:21 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Save the Civic Auditorium!

EXTERNAL
Hello Council members,
Please stick to your guns on behalf of revitalizing the Civic Auditorium, an institution which continues to serve a united Santa Monica population in countless ways.

Thank you for your participation in its continued support.

Best,
Katharine Dreyfuss
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1100 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 13 Mitchell Kois
From: Leslie Hope <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 1:28 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: RE: Item 11C Approval to extend ENA with RPG for six-months

Your support of this request is greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,
Leslie Hope
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1101 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 14 Mitchell Kois
From: Lulu Cafe <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 1:15 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: SUPPORT Agenda Item 11-C – (1/14/25) Grant the Extension needed by ENA to Save the Civic.

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I've lived in Santa Moncia since 1980, and prior to its closure attended many different types of events at the Civic. It's a treasure that can and should be restored and revived. RPG wants to do this, at no cost to the City.

Please give them the chance to bring back this treasure.

Thank you,
Glenna Dumey
1250 Harvard Street
310-890-5886
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1102 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 15 Mitchell Kois
From: Angela Ma <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 1:10 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: RE: Item 11C Approval to extend ENA with RPG for six-months

Your support of this request is greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,
[Your name]
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1103 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 16 Mitchell Kois
From: Robert Freel <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 1:02 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete
Subject: RE: Item 11C Approval to extend ENA with RPG for six-months

Your support of this request is greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,
Robert Freel
Santa Monica resident
Sent from my mobile device. Please excuse typos.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1104 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 17 Mitchell Kois
From: David Misch <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 1:00 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: SUPPORT Agenda Item 11-C – (1/14/25) Grant the Extension needed by ENA to Save the Civic

EXTERNAL
Northeast Neighbors requests that the City Council extend the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) for the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium restoration project as requested by Revitalization Partners Group (RPG).

The following are impressive and important aspects to the proposal:

RPG commits that their proposal will require no City money or bonds, but to financing the project on its own.

A new park is planned on the site of the existing parking lot, adding green open space.

Thank you.

David Misch
1027 Princeton St.

Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1105 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 18 Mitchell Kois
From: Gayle Gilman <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 12:51 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: Santa Monica Civic

EXTERNAL
To: Santa Monica City Council
From: A Concerned Resident
Re: SUPPORT Agenda Item 11-C – (1/14/25) Extension needed for Civic ENA Northeast Neighbors requests that the City Council extend the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) for the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium restoration project as requested by Revitalization Partners Group (RPG).

The following are impressive and important aspects to the proposal:

RPG commits that their proposal will require no City money or bonds, but to financing the project on its own.

A new park is planned on the site of the existing parking lot, adding green open space.

Don’t ruin one of the best developments happening in this city in years.

Thank you
Gayle Gilman
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1106 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 19 Mitchell Kois
From: Susan Suntree <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 12:31 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: RE: Item 11C Approval to extend ENA with RPG for six-months

Your support of this request is greatly appreciated.

Susan Suntree
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1107 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 20 Mitchell Kois
From: Robert H. Taylor <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 12:16 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: Re: SUPPORT Agenda Item 11-C – (1/14/25) Extension needed for Civic ENA

EXTERNAL
I urge the City Council to extend the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) for the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium restoration project as requested by Revitalization Partners Group (RPG).

The following are impressive and important aspects to the proposal:

RPG commits that their proposal will require no City money or bonds, but to financing the project on its own.

A new park is planned on the site of the existing parking lot, adding green open space.

Thank you
Bob Taylor
Ocean Park Resident
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1108 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 21 Mitchell Kois
From: richard colman <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 12:13 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: RE: Item 11C Approval to extend ENA with RPG for six-months

EXTERNAL
I spent my youth seeing shows at the Santa Monica CIVIC - preserve it - dont fuck it up !! Dear Council Members,
Please extend the original Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) with RPG for six months to allow completion of the financial analysis and negotiations for the restoration of the landmark Santa Monica Civic Auditorium. The proposed state-of-the-art facility will be an important asset for the City’s performing arts, culture, finances, and reputation.

Your support of this request is greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,
[Your name]
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1109 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 22 Mitchell Kois
From: Jenny Lipson <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 12:09 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: RE: Item 11C Approval to extend ENA with RPG for six-months

Your support of this request is greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,
Jenny Lipson
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1110 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 23 Mitchell Kois
From: Victoria Yust <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 12:09 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: RE: Item 11C Approval to extend ENA with RPG for six-months

This Welton Becket building is worth preserving. We can’t keep losing valuable landmarks in Southern California. And, we need more performing arts venues on the westside.

Your support of this request is greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,
Victoria Yust
Victoria Yust, AIA
Architect
Tierra Sol y Mar, Inc.
601 Rose Avenue
Venice, CA 90291
T 310.392.2775
[email protected]
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1111 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 24 Mitchell Kois
From: Jenny Lipson <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 12:09 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: RE: Item 11C Approval to extend ENA with RPG for six-months

Your support of this request is greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,
Jenny Lipson
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1112 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 25 Mitchell Kois
From: nancy hall <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 12:04 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Barry Snell; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Ellis Raskin; Natalya Zernitskaya; Dan Hall; Council Mailbox
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-C - SUPPORT 6-month extension of ENA for the Civic Auditorium

RPG has presented a design concept that preserves the Civic’s historic character while creating a modern, accessible 3,000-seat performance venue. The plan maintains the building’s iconic exterior, includes essential seismic upgrades and accessibility improvements, and adds complementary outdoor spaces and amenities. T his project offers tremendous benefits to Santa Monica:
• Preserves our only building meeting all 6 landmarking criteria while returning it to its original purpose as a premier music venue
• Provides significant economic impact through the cultural destination multiplier effect ($6 for every $1 in ticket sales) • Revitalizes a dormant corner near 7 major hotels, the Expo line, and the freeway • Leverages federal tax credits already preliminarily approved by the California State Historic Preservation Office RPG needs the 6-month extension to complete essential detailed cost estimates and financial feasibility studies.

This is a rare opportunity to revitalize downtown, help restore Santa Monica’s reputation as a performance destination, and bring back the economic prosperity our city needs.

Again, I urge you to extend the ENA agreement with RPG by 6 months.

Sincerely,
Nancy Hall
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1113 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) 26 Mitchell Kois
From: Tony Huizar <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 12:01 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Barry Snell Subject: ITEM 11c - Support for Santa Monica Civic Auditorium - Attachments: Support Agenda Item 11C.pdf

EXTERNAL
October 14, 2025
Dear Mayor Lana Negrete and Councilmembers,
On behalf of the Pico Neighborhood Association, we express our full support for the City’s continued partnership with the Revitalization Partners Group (RPG) in the effort to restore and reactivate the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium.

For more than a decade, this historic landmark has remained closed, a reminder of both its cultural legacy and the challenges of bringing such a significant public asset back to life. After multiple failed attempts to secure a qualified partner, RPG has assembled a world-class team uniquely positioned to deliver on both the vision and execution required to reopen the Civic. Their experience in live entertainment, sustainability, and adaptive reuse sets them apart, and their stated commitment to move forward without public subsidy should be seen as a tremendous benefit to the City and its taxpayers.

While staff’s financial analysis raises valid questions, the expertise within RPG drawing on proven partners from Live Nation, Oak View Group, and others deserves a full opportunity to address those questions directly. Restarting the process now would only delay progress, add uncertainty, and risk losing a team with a proven record of success on projects of this scale.

The Civic Auditorium has always represented more than a building; it is a shared space for art, culture, and civic pride. Its revival would not only restore a cornerstone of Santa Monica’s identity but also bring economic vitality that supports local businesses and reaffirms the City’s role as a cultural leader.

For these reasons, the Pico Neighborhood Association urges the City Council to extend the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement and allow RPG to continue its work with staff toward a viable, transparent, and true community-serving plan.

Sincerely,
Tony Huizar
Chair, Pico Neighborhood Association
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1114 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium)

PICO NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION
October 14, 2025
Dear Mayor Lana Negrete and Councilmembers,
On behalf of the Pico Neighborhood Association, we express our full support for the City’s continued partnership with the Revitalization Partners Group (RPG) in the effort to restore and reactivate the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium.

PICO NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION | SANTA MONICA 90404 | [email protected] Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1115 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium)

PICO NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION
For these reasons, the Pico Neighborhood Association urges the City Council to extend the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement and allow RPG to continue its work with staff toward a viable, transparent, and true community-serving plan.

Sincerely,
Tony Huizar
Chair, Pico Neighborhood Association
PICO NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION | SANTA MONICA 90404 | [email protected] Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.f
Packet Pg. 1116 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 2] (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for the Civic Center Auditorium) Civic
Auditorium
Exclusive Negotiations
Agreement
First Modification Request
Administrative Item: 11.C.

City Council Meeting
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.g
Packet Pg. 1117 Attachment: Powerpoint Presentation (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for Background
• Current assessment process with RPG began back on December 12, 2023 • At that time, City Council directed that staff initiate a request for letters of interest in redeveloping the Civic Auditorium site • RPG was eventually identified as the entity with which the City would engage exclusive negotiations on July 23, 2024
• RPG is comprised of three entities, including Make Good Group, Azoff Company / Oak View Group, and Live Nation • Discussions w/ RPG regarding development of the ENA were cumbersome • The City submitted the ENA to RPG on July 31, 2024
• Staff attempted to engage w/ RPG on at least 5 occasions to finalize the ENA in August, September, and October 2024 • Eventually, on October 14, 2024, staff and RPG engaged together with the Coastal Commission, and at that point, RPG confirmed they were working on ENA redlines
• ENA redlines were submitted by RPG back to the City on October 25, 2024, and the City provided responses and counter provisions back to RPG on November 8, 2024 • The City attempted to connect with RPG on the ENA on November 18, December 5, and December 10, 2024 ENA Development Background
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.g
Packet Pg. 1118 Attachment: Powerpoint Presentation (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for Background
• Eventually, on December 13, RPG indicated they would have concept designs by the end of January 2025, with a pro forma developed by Q2-2025 • To facilitate this process, RPG requested a 9-month ENA term, which the City considered and approved on December 17, 2024
• At that time, the City Council also provided a deadline to execute the ENA by January 27, 2025 • However, on January 27, 2025, RPG requested that the City provide an additional extension to finalize the ENA
• The City Council amended the ENA deadline to February 28, 2025, a deadline that RPG missed • Finally, on March 25, 2025, the City Council provided a final extension to execute the ENA, which was eventually completed on April 8, 2025 ENA Development Background
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.g
Packet Pg. 1119 Attachment: Powerpoint Presentation (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for Background
• Per the ENA terms, RPG had between April 8 – October 8 to engage the following workplan • Develop a scope of work
• Coordinate preliminary architectural concepts
• Identify total anticipated development costs and financing sources • Establish a proposed development schedule
• Identify community benefits from the project • Engage community engagement • Establish a proposed programming plan • Create an operational plan related to the project identified • With the ENA having expired on October 8, the City Council is now in a position to consider whether to extend exclusive negotiations with RPG or conclude the ENA to pursue other redevelopment / reuse options for the Civic
ENA Terms
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.g
Packet Pg. 1120 Attachment: Powerpoint Presentation (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for Background
• Since April 8, 2025, RPG has completed the following work • Completed basic due diligence and preliminary design concepts • Presented conceptual renderings to the City that they have asked to remain confidential
• Proposed utilizing the Civic as a venue for immersive “holographic show” technology, to include the development of 14,000 square feet of new retail / restaurant space
• Of note, through the 6-month ENA period, RPG has not provided the City with any documented financial analysis, written pro forma, development plan, or operating protocols
RPG Due Diligence Work Progress
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.g
Packet Pg. 1121 Attachment: Powerpoint Presentation (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for Background
• RPG has shared that they have engaged three architectural firms – including Jerde, Stufish, and BluePrint Studio – to assess the Civic site • Utilizing those architects, RPG developed a preliminary design deck for the Civic that was presented one-time for City staff and councilmember review • City was not allowed to retain the design concepts presented, with RPG stating that the designs were confidential
• However, RPG released designs to the public during the week of October 6, and eventually emailed the City a confidential design deck on October 8 and informed staff that the plans should not be shared publicly
RPG Engagement To Date
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.g
Packet Pg. 1122 Attachment: Powerpoint Presentation (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for Background
• Based on a review of the design concepts, RPG has envisioned the following: • Restoring the original design of the Civic including its original main lobby and exterior features • Historic elements of the Civic would be preserved or restored to meet historic tax credit requirements • The parking where SWIP and surface lot is located would be relocated toward the rear of the Civic, creating an open and flexible ‘green space’ park space that can be programmed for a wide variety of events on the former courthouse parking lot area, and would include a new building approximately 14,000 square feet of food and beverage offerings on the periphery of the proposed new park space
• The proposal also envisions reconfiguring the Civic to increase its audience capacity from 3,000 to slightly more than 3,300 • The draft designs also contemplate the creation of a roof top bar / restaurant atop the East Wing and stage-house that backs onto Pico • The current parking located at the front of the Civic would be relocated to the rear of the building on Pico, and RPG’s design does not consider developing any additional parking capacity for the expanded venue • For the Civic itself, RPG is proposing the installation of new technology to create immersive avatar / holographic shows that blend live performers with digital artists superimposed on the stage using motion capture technology RPG Design Concept Overview
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.g
Packet Pg. 1123 Attachment: Powerpoint Presentation (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for Background
• As shared previously, RPG did not provide the City with any financial, budgetary, operational, or implementation plans associated with their assessment of the Civic
• RPG did provide some verbal details related to their project, including a description of the proposed capacity of the reformatted Civic (3,300 seats) and an estimated ticket price per show ($125) • Staff supplemented that information with additional City knowledge about the site to develop a rough order-of-magnitude financial model for the project • Of note, the analysis performed by staff is not intended to serve as a definitive financial marker for the project, but is instead intended to assess the financial likelihood / feasibility of the envisioned project • Details utilized by staff as part of our assessment included: • Appraisals of the Civic property conducted in 2023 • Statement of probable construction cost developed by the firm Cumming in May 2023 to convert the Civic into a sports / entertainment venue Project Viability Assessment Performed
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.g
Packet Pg. 1124 Attachment: Powerpoint Presentation (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for 2023 Appraisals Conducted Background
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.g
Packet Pg. 1125 Attachment: Powerpoint Presentation (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for 2023 ROM Developed By Cumming Background
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.g
Packet Pg. 1126 Attachment: Powerpoint Presentation (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for ROM Fiscal Viability Review Background
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.g
Packet Pg. 1127 Attachment: Powerpoint Presentation (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for Background
• As noted previously, the assessment performed by staff should not be taken to be a definitive assessment regarding the feasibility of RPG’s proposed project • Given that RPG provided no actual financial, business, or operational details, the analysis by staff utilized prior data collected in 2023; rough-order-of-magnitude cost assessments assumed for the holographic system and retail project; and verbal details provided by RPG • With that being said, the ROM analysis performed seems to indicate that the project would perform below industry benchmarks
• The Civic project envisioned by RPG could still be actualized, however the concept being advanced appears to be financially unviable without a subsidy or restructured scope Project Appears Challenging To Execute
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.g
Packet Pg. 1128 Attachment: Powerpoint Presentation (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for Background
• RPG has asked that the City Council consider playing a ~7 minute video that they released to the public outlining their proposed project • If the 6-month extension were to be granted, RPG has indicated that they would: • Develop a more formal project scope and project cost estimates • Develop a pro forma for the project • Identify a financing structure for the project • Continue to engage in community outreach RPG’s Request
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.g
Packet Pg. 1129 Attachment: Powerpoint Presentation (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for Background
• Approve a six-month ENA extension to RPG
• Grant a three-month ENA extension to RPG
• Decline to extend the ENA with RPG and provide staff with direction to explore alternative options for the Civic site • Of note, declining to extend the ENA would not preclude the City from continuing to work with RPG
City Council Options
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.g
Packet Pg. 1130 Attachment: Powerpoint Presentation (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for Questions? Background
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025
Item 11-C
October 14, 2025

11.C.g
Packet Pg. 1131 Attachment: Powerpoint Presentation (7314 : 11C. Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement for City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: October 14, 2025
Agenda Item: 11.D
1 of 4
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Heidi Von Tongeln, Interim City Attorney, City Attorney's Office, Administration
Subject: Acceptance of Agreement Imposing Restrictions on Real Property for the Parcel Located at 2644 30th Street and Second Reading and Adoption of an Ordinance Amending the Official Districting Map for a Portion of the Parcel Located at 2644 30th Street
Recommended Actions
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt a finding that the acceptance of the attached Agreement Imposing Restrictions on Real Property (Covenant) for the parcel located at 2644 30th Street is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) of the CEQA Guidelines, consistent with the findings set forth in the “Environmental Review” section of this Report;

2. Accept the attached Agreement Imposing Restrictions on Real Property (Covenant) for the parcel located at 2644 30th Street.

Staff recommends that upon approval of Covenant that the City Council:

1. Adopt the attached Ordinance amending the Official Districting Map for a Portion of the Parcel Located at 2644 30th Street.

At its meeting on September 30, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution Number 11702 (CCS), amending the General Plan Land Use Map and introduced for first reading an Ordinance amending the Official Districting Map for a portion of the subject property located at 2644 30th Street developed with a commercial office building.

As explained in the September 30, 2025 staff report, the property owner voluntarily offered to execute a covenant with the City confirming its stated intention that for 10 years, the property owner will not (a) redevelop the commercial lots utilizing the new

11.D
Packet Pg. 1132
2 of 4
Neighborhood Commercial (NC) zoning standards for Housing Projects and/or (b) redevelop the Single-Unit Residential (R1) zoned surface parking.

The attached Agreement Imposing Restrictions on Real Property (Exhibit C) for Council’s acceptance is consistent with this voluntary offer. Specifically, through the covenant, the property owner agrees that, for a period ten years after the effective date of the ordinance amending the Official Districting Map, the property owner, its successors, and assigns:

A. Shall not file an application for a Housing Project, as defined in Santa Monica Municipal Code Section 9.52.020.1125 (“Housing Project”), and/or shall not redevelop the Commercial Lot, or any portion thereof, as a Housing Project; and
B. Shall not file an application for a Housing Project and/or shall not redevelop the Parking Lot, or any portion thereof.

Staff recommends that Council first adopt a finding that the acceptance of the attached Agreement Imposing Restrictions on Real Property (Covenant) for the parcel located at 2644 30th Street is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) and the attached Covenant.

Subsequently, the City Council is recommended to, under a separate motion, proceed with adoption of the Ordinance that is being presented for consideration.

11.D
Packet Pg. 1133
3 of 4
Environmental Review
The acceptance of the covenant is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that CEQA does not apply where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. Through the covenant, the property owner commits to restrictions on future development of the property for a period of ten years. No change in the physical environment would result from the covenant, because there would be no change to existing conditions on the parcel, and no development is proposed as part of accepting the covenant. Therefore, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the amendments may have a significant effect on the environment and accordingly, accepting the covenant is exempt from CEQA under Section 15061(b)(3).

On September 30, 2025, the amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map and Official Districting map were previously determined to be exempt from the CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) of the CEQA Guidelines.

Financial Impacts and Budget Actions
There is no immediate financial impact or budget action necessary as a result of the recommended action. Staff will return to Council if specific budget actions are required in the future.

Prepared By: Bradley Michaud, Legal Administrative Services Officer Approved Forwarded to Council

11.D
Packet Pg. 1134
4 of 4
Attachments:

A. ORD-30th Street Districting Map Amendments 2d
B. September 30, 2025 Staff Report (Web Link)
C. Deed Restriction 2644 30th
D. Written Comments

11.D
Packet Pg. 1135
1 City Council Meeting: October 14, 2025 Santa Monica, California ORDINANCE NUMBER ____ (CCS)
(City Council Series)

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA

AMENDING THE OFFICIAL DISTRICTING MAP OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA REGARDING TWO LOTS LOCATED WITHIN 2644 30TH STREET
WHEREAS, the Northwest 60 feet of lots 78 and 83 of Tract No. 1980 (the “Commercial Lots”, also shown on the map included in Attachment “A”) was developed in 1956 as a commercial office building, which includes approximately 35,000 square feet of leasable space; and
WHEREAS, historically, since at least 1961, this portion of the Commercial Lots was designated as C2 (Limited Commercial) on the City’s General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Districting Maps; and
WHEREAS, on July 6, 2010, the City Council adopted the Land Use and Circulation Element (“LUCE”) of the City’s General Plan, which included an amendment to the General Plan Use Map; and
WHEREAS, on June 23, 2015, the City adopted a revised Zoning Ordinance, which included a revised Official Districting Map; and
WHEREAS, when the General Plan Land Use and the Official Districting Maps were amended as part of the 2015 Zoning Ordinance update, the subject Commercial Lots were changed to Single Family Housing in the Land Use Map and Single-Unit Residential (R1) in the Official Districting Map, respectively; and WHEREAS, this rezoning to R1 appears to have been inadvertent given the longstanding use of the property and prior designation as C2; and

11.D.a
Packet Pg. 1136 Attachment: ORD-30th Street Districting Map Amendments 2d (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading) 2 WHEREAS, during the public review process and in the course of analyzing the boundaries of the newly created zoning districts, inconsistencies between the adopted LUCE Land Use Designation Map and the then existing Official Districting Map were identified as reflected in the April 14, 2015, Staff Report to City Council; and WHEREAS, as a result of the identified inconsistencies, City Staff attempted to compare the LUCE Map with the existing Official Districting Map in the City, to generate a listing of inconsistent parcels, and
WHEREAS, a list of 115 parcels with such inconsistencies (“Inconsistent Parcel List”) was prepared and included with the Staff Report to the Planning Commission and were reviewed in detail on June 18, 2014 and October 1, 2014; and WHEREAS, the Inconsistent Parcel List was also included and discussed in the April 14, 2015, City Council Staff Report and reviewed by the City Council prior to their voting on the Zoning Ordinance Districting Map; and
WHEREAS, the majority of these inconsistent parcels were those in the City whose land designations were changed to a commercial designation with the adoption of the LUCE Land Use Designation Map and were inconsistent with their predominantly residential zoning or partial residential zoning; and
WHEREAS, however, a portion of the properties on the Inconsistent Parcel List were those designated commercial/industrial on the then-existing Official Districting Map and improved with commercial/industrial uses but had been designated residential on the 2010 LUCE map; and
WHEREAS, the subject Commercial Lots appear to be similarly situated to these previously identified formerly commercial/industrial parcels; however, the subject Commercial Lots were inadvertently not included on the Inconsistent Parcel List; and

11.D.a
Packet Pg. 1137 Attachment: ORD-30th Street Districting Map Amendments 2d (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading) 3 WHEREAS, on May 5, 2015, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 10874 (CCS) amending the LUCE map to, among other things, change the LUCE designation for certain parcels that had been identified on the Inconsistent Parcel List as having inconsistent LUCE and then-existing Zoning Districting Map designations; and WHEREAS, on June 23, 2015, the City adopted a revised Zoning Ordinance, which included a revised Districting Map that designated the Commercial Lots as R1; and
WHEREAS, there are no permitted commercial uses in the R1 Zoning District; and
WHEREAS, the change of the Commercial Lots to the Single Family Housing designation and R1 zone has resulted in the existing building becoming a legal, nonconforming building and the existing uses becoming legal, nonconforming uses and, thus, creates impediments to future leasing opportunities and financing for the property given the limitations of the Single Family Housing designation and zoning of R1; and WHEREAS, on February 19, 2025, pursuant to Santa Monica Municipal Code Section 9.45.060(B), the Planning Commission adopted Resolution Number 25-003 (PCS), a Resolution of Intention, declaring its intention to consider recommending to the City Council that the Council, among other things, amend the General Plan Land Use Map and Official Districting Map of the City of Santa Monica for the Commercial Lots located at 2466 30th Street; and
WHEREAS, amending the Official Districting Map to zone the Commercial Lots located at 2644 30th Street as NC (Neighborhood Commercial) will correct the prior inadvertent designation and reflect the longstanding use of the Commercial Lots,

11.D.a
Packet Pg. 1138 Attachment: ORD-30th Street Districting Map Amendments 2d (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading) 4 removing impediments to future leasing and changes of use of the Commercial Lots; and
WHEREAS, amending the Official Districting Map to zone Commercial Lots located at 2644 30th Street as NC will correct the prior inadvertent designation and reflect the longstanding use of the property, ensure consistency with the General Plan, and remove impediments to future leasing and changes of use of the Commercial Lots, including the existing building; and
WHEREAS, on March 19, 2025, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing, and, after considering oral and written testimony regarding the proposed amendments to the Official Districting Map, adopted Resolution Number 25- 008 (PCS), recommending that the City Council amend the Official Districting Map for the Commercial Lots located at 2644 30th Street based on the following findings:

1. The change in district boundaries is consistent in principle with the General Plan in that the proposed amendments will provide consistency between existing development and the Official Districting Map. Due to an inadvertent reclassification of the Commercial Lots during both the 2010 Land Use and Circulation Element update and the 2015 Zoning Ordinance update to Single Family Housing and R1 (Single-Unit Residential), respectively, the commercial use of the Commercial Lots established in 1956 is now a nonconforming land use and the existing building on the Commercial Lots is a legal, nonconforming building. This inconsistency between the use and Official District Map has created impediments to future development due to the land use limitations of the R1 zoning district, leasing/changes of use tenant space within the building, and financing the property. The proposed change will rectify this issue by aligning the Official Districting Map with the historic existing commercial use of the

11.D.a
Packet Pg. 1139 Attachment: ORD-30th Street Districting Map Amendments 2d (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading) 5 Commercial Lots;

2. The change in district boundaries is consistent with the purpose of this Ordinance to promote the growth of the City in an orderly manner and to promote and protect the public health, safety, and general welfare in that the proposed change will align the Official Districting Map with the existing commercial development of the Commercial Lots. Since 1956 the Commercial Lots have been developed as a commercial use, but inadvertently during both the 2010 Land Use and Circulation Element update and 2015 Zoning Ordinance update was reclassified as Single Family Housing and R1 (Single-Unit Residential), respectively. This inconsistency between the use and zoning district has created impediments to future changes of use and development due to the land use limitations of the R1 zoning district, leasing tenant space within the building, and financing the property. The proposed change will rectify this issue by aligning the Official Districting Map with the historic existing use of the Commercial Lots; and

3. The change in district boundaries is necessary to achieve the balance of land uses desired by the City, consistent with the General Plan, and to increase the inventory of land within a given Zoning District in that the Commercial Lots have historically been developed with as a commercial use since 1956 and were zoned as such until it was inadvertently amended as part of both the 2010 Land Use and Circulation update and 2015 Zoning Ordinance update to Single Family Housing and R1 (Single-Unit Residential), respectively. This inadvertent reclassification has resulted in a nonconforming condition and impediments to future development due to land use limitations of the R1 zoning district, leasing tenant space with the building, and financing the property. The proposed change will align the Official District Map for the Commercial

11.D.a
Packet Pg. 1140 Attachment: ORD-30th Street Districting Map Amendments 2d (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading) 6 Lots with existing development; and
WHEREAS, the adjacent parking lot that is designated in the Land Use Map as Single Family Residential and in the Official Districting Map as R-1 Single-Unit Residential will remain unchanged; and
WHEREAS, on May 13, 2024, the City Council conducted a duly noticed hearing, and, after considering all oral and written testimony, decided to table the adoption of the amendments to the Official Districting Map to a later date; and WHEREAS, after renewed requests from the property owner and new information submitted in support thereof, on September 30, 2025, the City Council conducted a duly noticed hearing, and, after considering all oral and written testimony, desires to amend the Official Districting Map for the Commercial Lots located at 2644 30th Street as set forth below.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Based upon the oral and written testimony presented to the City Council at the public hearing on September 30, 2025, regarding the proposed change to the Official Districting Map for the Commercial Lots located at 2644 30th Street, the City Council hereby makes the following findings:

Due to an inadvertent reclassification of the Commercial Lots during both the 2010 Land Use and Circulation Element update and the 2015 Zoning Ordinance update to Single Family Housing and R1 (Single-Unit

11.D.a
Packet Pg. 1141 Attachment: ORD-30th Street Districting Map Amendments 2d (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading) 7 Residential), respectively, the commercial use of the Commercial Lots established in 1956 is now a nonconforming land use. This inconsistency between the use and Official District Map has created impediments to future leasing of tenant space within the building and financing the property due to the land use limitations of the R1 zoning district . The proposed change will rectify this issue by aligning the Official Districting Map with the historic existing commercial use of the Commercial Lots.

2. The change in district boundaries is consistent with the purpose of this Ordinance to promote the growth of the City in an orderly manner and to promote and protect the public health, safety, and general welfare in that the proposed change will align the Official Districting Map with the existing commercial development of the Commercial Lots. Since 1956 the Commercial Lots have been developed as a commercial use, but inadvertently during both the 2010 Land Use and Circulation Element update and 2015 Zoning Ordinance update were reclassified as Single Family Housing and R1 (Single-Unit Residential), respectively. This inconsistency between the use and zoning district has created impediments to future leasing of tenant space within the building and financing the property due to the land use limitations of the R1 zoning district. The proposed change will rectify this issue by aligning the Official Districting Map with the historic existing use of the Commercial Lots.

11.D.a
Packet Pg. 1142 Attachment: ORD-30th Street Districting Map Amendments 2d (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading) 8 the Commercial Lots have historically been developed with as a commercial use since 1956 and was zoned as such until it was inadvertently amended as part of both the 2010 Land Use and Circulation update and 2015 Zoning Ordinance update to Single Family Housing and R1 (Single-Unit Residential), respectively. This inadvertent reclassification has resulted in a nonconforming condition and impediments to future leasing of tenant space within the building and financing the property due to land use limitations of the R1 zoning district. The proposed change will align the Official District Map for the Commercial Lots with existing development.

Section 2. The City of Santa Monica Official Districting Map is hereby amended as set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto.

SECTION 3. Any provision of the Municipal Code or appendices thereto inconsistent with the provisions of this Ordinance, to the extent of such inconsistencies and no further, is hereby repealed or modified to that extent necessary to effect the provisions of this Ordinance.

SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of the ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 5. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall attest to the passage of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall cause the same to be published once in the official

11.D.a
Packet Pg. 1143 Attachment: ORD-30th Street Districting Map Amendments 2d (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading) 9 newspaper within 15 days after its adoption. This Ordinance shall become effective 30 days from its adoption.

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

HEIDI VON TONGELN
Interim City Attorney

11.D.a
Packet Pg. 1144 Attachment: ORD-30th Street Districting Map Amendments 2d (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading) 10 EXHIBIT A
Amendment to the Zoning Designation in the Official Districting Map for the Commercial Lots Located within 2644 30th Street
Address APN Zoning
Classification
Proposed
Portion of 2644
30th St described
as Northwest 60
feet of lots 78 and
83 of Tract No.
1980 (see map
below)
Portion of
4270-016-
084
R1 (Single-Unit
Residential)
NC (Neighborhood
Commercial)

11.D.a
Packet Pg. 1145 Attachment: ORD-30th Street Districting Map Amendments 2d (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading)

11.D.c
Packet Pg. 1146 Attachment: Deed Restriction 2644 30th (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading)

11.D.c
Packet Pg. 1147 Attachment: Deed Restriction 2644 30th (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading)

11.D.c
Packet Pg. 1148 Attachment: Deed Restriction 2644 30th (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading)

11.D.c
Packet Pg. 1149 Attachment: Deed Restriction 2644 30th (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading)

11.D.c
Packet Pg. 1150 Attachment: Deed Restriction 2644 30th (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading)

11.D.c
Packet Pg. 1151 Attachment: Deed Restriction 2644 30th (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading)

11.D.c
Packet Pg. 1152 Attachment: Deed Restriction 2644 30th (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading)

11.D.c
Packet Pg. 1153 Attachment: Deed Restriction 2644 30th (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading)

11.D.c
Packet Pg. 1154 Attachment: Deed Restriction 2644 30th (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading)

11.D.c
Packet Pg. 1155 Attachment: Deed Restriction 2644 30th (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading)

11.D.c
Packet Pg. 1156 Attachment: Deed Restriction 2644 30th (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading)

11.D.c
Packet Pg. 1157 Attachment: Deed Restriction 2644 30th (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading) 1 Mitchell Kois
From: Holly Silvers <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 3:41 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-D - OPPOSE Covenant and Ordinance Changing the Zoning of 2644 30th St.

EXTERNAL
I urge you to PLEASE!!!!!! Our neighborhood is begging you! a) reject the 10-year deed restriction limiting only housing development at 2644 30th Street, b) oppose the ordinance upzoning of 2644 30th Street from residential to commercial, and c) instruct Staff to return with rescission of the LUCE amendment.

This would be directly across 29th and 30th Streets from 1- and 2-story homes.

Procedural flaws with this spot upzoning include the following:
 City Staff continue to state that the parcel R1 (residential) zoning was an “inadvertent error” in the 2010 LUCE, but this appears to be untrue. The LUCE update involved a lengthy process intended to protect residential neighborhoods from commercial activity, which was limited to the boulevards.
 The City Staff and City Attorney have spent a year helping the property owner upzone the parcel without disclosing this relationship to the public.  City Staff allowed the owner to both skip the application process for a zoning change and avoid paying $34,000 in application fees.

Upzoning to Neighborhood Commercial would also create additional density, traffic, parking shortages, noise, and infrastructure strain. Staff has provided no legitimate justification for this upzoning. Proceeding virtually guarantees costly litigation against the city. It also sets a dangerous precedent, opening floodgates for upzoning throughout all residential neighborhoods. Other developers are waiting to follow suit, which will erode residents’ trust in local government and further exacerbate our already strained city resources.

Item 11-D
October 14, 2025
Item 11-D
October 14, 2025

11.D.d
Packet Pg. 1158 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading) 2 Again, I urge you to a) reject the 10-year deed restriction limiting only housing development at 2644 30th Street, b) oppose the ordinance upzoning of 2644 30th Street, and c) instruct Staff to return with rescission of the LUCE amendment.

Sincerely,
Holly Granelli
SM resident since 1999
Condo owner and business owner
Mom of 2 Grant Elementary students
Item 11-D
October 14, 2025
Item 11-D
October 14, 2025

11.D.d
Packet Pg. 1159 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading) 3 Mitchell Kois
From: Mayra Herrera <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 3:16 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-D - OPPOSE Covenant and Ordinance Changing the Zoning of 2644 30th St.

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Procedural flaws with this spot upzoning include the following:

The City Staff and City AƩorney have spent a year helping the property owner upzone the parcel without disclosing this relaƟonship to the public.

City Staff allowed the owner to both skip the applicaƟon process for a zoning change and avoid paying $34,000 in applicaƟon fees.

Item 11-D
October 14, 2025
Item 11-D
October 14, 2025

11.D.d
Packet Pg. 1160 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading) 4 Sincerely,
Mayra Herrera
Item 11-D
October 14, 2025
Item 11-D
October 14, 2025

11.D.d
Packet Pg. 1161 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading) 5 Mitchell Kois
From: Cydney Kirschbaum <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 3:01 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-D - OPPOSE Covenant and Ordinance Changing the Zoning of 2644 30th St.

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Procedural flaws with this spot upzoning include the following:

The City Staff and City AƩorney have spent a year helping the property owner upzone the parcel without disclosing this relaƟonship to the public.

City Staff allowed the owner to both skip the applicaƟon process for a zoning change and avoid paying $34,000 in applicaƟon fees.

Item 11-D
October 14, 2025
Item 11-D
October 14, 2025

11.D.d
Packet Pg. 1162 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading) 6 Sincerely,
Cydney and Kenneth
Cydney and Kenneth Kirschbaum
[email protected]
Item 11-D
October 14, 2025
Item 11-D
October 14, 2025

11.D.d
Packet Pg. 1163 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading) 7 Mitchell Kois
From: Mindi Shank <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 2:18 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-D - OPPOSE Covenant and Ordinance Changing the Zoning of 2644 30th St.

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Procedural flaws with this spot upzoning include the following:

The City Staff and City AƩorney have spent a year helping the property owner upzone the parcel without disclosing this relaƟonship to the public.

City Staff allowed the owner to both skip the applicaƟon process for a zoning change and avoid paying $34,000 in applicaƟon fees.

Item 11-D
October 14, 2025
Item 11-D
October 14, 2025

11.D.d
Packet Pg. 1164 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading) 8 Sincerely,
Mindi Shank
Item 11-D
October 14, 2025
Item 11-D
October 14, 2025

11.D.d
Packet Pg. 1165 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading) 9 Mitchell Kois
From: Kelli <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 2:12 PM
To: Lana Negrete; councilmtgitems; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-D - OPPOSE Covenant and Ordinance Changing the Zoning of 2644 30th St.

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to
a) reject the 10-year deed restriction limiting only housing development at 2644 30th Street, b) oppose the ordinance up zoning of 2644 30th Street from residential to commercial, and c) instruct Staff to return with rescission of the LUCE amendment.

The property, which is NOT located on a boulevard, currently has a 2-story office building dating from the 1950s and a surface parking lot. It is zoned R1 (residential). The owner(s) want the property rezoned to Neighborhood Commercial (NC), which would allow it eventually to be redeveloped to 85 feet in height, with the current 55-foot height limit on Ocean Park Blvd. plus state density bonuses. This would be directly across 29th and 30th Streets from 1- and 2-story homes. The proposed 10-year restriction on developing housing projects is merely a short-term reprieve from a tower shading the low-rise residential neighborhood, and it offers no protection against commercial activity, which our General Plan specifically limits to the boulevards. Procedural flaws with this spot up zoning include the following: City Staff continue to state that the parcel R1 (residential) zoning was an “inadvertent error” in the 2010 LUCE, but this appears to be untrue. The LUCE update involved a lengthy process intended to protect residential neighborhoods from commercial activity, which was limited to the boulevards. The City Staff and City Attorney have spent a year helping the property owner up zone the parcel without disclosing this relationship to the public. City Staff allowed the owner to both skip the application process for a zoning change and avoid paying $34,000 in application fees. The retail center on Ocean Park Blvd. between 29th and 30th, currently zoned Neighborhood Commercial, already extends further into the residential neighborhood than the NC zones on the adjacent blocks. Up zoning even a portion of the 2644 30th parcel creates a “peninsula” of commercial use in a residential neighborhood, and it is spot-zoning. Up zoning to Neighborhood Commercial would also create additional density, traffic, parking shortages, noise, and infrastructure strain. Staff has provided no legitimate justification for this up zoning. Proceeding virtually guarantees costly litigation against the city. It also sets a dangerous precedent, opening floodgates for up zoning throughout all residential neighborhoods. Other developers are waiting to follow suit, which will erode residents’ trust in local government and further exacerbate our already strained city resources. Again, I urge you to a) reject the 10-year deed restriction limiting only housing development at 2644 30th Street, b) oppose the ordinance up zoning of 2644 30th Street, and c) instruct Staff to return with rescission of the LUCE amendment.

Sincerely,
Kelli Urode
Item 11-D
October 14, 2025
Item 11-D
October 14, 2025

11.D.d
Packet Pg. 1166 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading) 10 Mitchell Kois
From: Vivien Flitton <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 1:53 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-D - OPPOSE Covenant and Ordinance Changing the Zoning of 2644 30th St.

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Sincerely,
Vivien FliƩon
Item 11-D
October 14, 2025
Item 11-D
October 14, 2025

11.D.d
Packet Pg. 1167 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading) 11 Mitchell Kois
From: Nancy Hicks <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 1:43 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-D - OPPOSE Covenant and Ordinance Changing the Zoning of 2644 30th St.

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,
We urge you to
a) reject the 10-year deed restriction limiting only housing development at 2644 30th Street, b) oppose the ordinance upzoning of 2644 30th Street from residential to commercial, and c) instruct Staff to return with rescission of the LUCE amendment.

Sincerely,
Nancy & Wes Hicks
Item 11-D
October 14, 2025
Item 11-D
October 14, 2025

11.D.d
Packet Pg. 1168 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading) 12 Mitchell Kois
From: LUCY F STONE <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 12:28 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-D - OPPOSE Covenant and Ordinance Changing the Zoning of 2644 30th St.

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Procedural flaws with this spot upzoning include the following:

The City Staff and City Attorney have spent a year helping the property owner upzone the parcel without disclosing this relationship to the public.

City Staff allowed the owner to both skip the application process for a zoning change and avoid paying $34,000 in application fees.

Item 11-D
October 14, 2025
Item 11-D
October 14, 2025

11.D.d
Packet Pg. 1169 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading) 13 Again, I urge you to a) reject the 10-year deed restriction limiting only housing development at 2644 30th Street, b) oppose the ordinance upzoning of 2644 30th Street, and c) instruct Staff to return with rescission of the LUCE amendment.

Sincerely,
[Lucy Frances Stone
Item 11-D
October 14, 2025
Item 11-D
October 14, 2025

11.D.d
Packet Pg. 1170 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading) 14 Mitchell Kois
From: Maury Pearl <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 12:11 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-D - OPPOSE Covenant and Ordinance Changing the Zoning of 2644 30th St.

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Procedural flaws with this spot upzoning include the following:

The City Staff and City Attorney have spent a year helping the property owner upzone the parcel without disclosing this relationship to the public.

City Staff allowed the owner to both skip the application process for a zoning change and avoid paying $34,000 in application fees.

Item 11-D
October 14, 2025
Item 11-D
October 14, 2025

11.D.d
Packet Pg. 1171 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading) 15 Again, I urge you to a) reject the 10-year deed restriction limiting only housing development at 2644 30th Street, b) oppose the ordinance upzoning of 2644 30th Street, and c) instruct Staff to return with rescission of the LUCE amendment.

Sincerely,
Maury Pearl
Sunset Park Resident
Item 11-D
October 14, 2025
Item 11-D
October 14, 2025

11.D.d
Packet Pg. 1172 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading) 16 Mitchell Kois
From: mwdobbs <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 11:53 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-D - OPPOSE Covenant and Ordinance Changing the Zoning of 2644 30th St.

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to
a) reject the 10-year deed restricƟon limiƟng only housing development at 2644 30th Street, b) oppose the ordinance upzoning of 2644 30th Street from residenƟal to commercial, and c) instruct Staff to return with rescission of the LUCE amendment.

The property, which is NOT located on a boulevard, currently has a 2-story office building daƟng from the 1950s and a surface parking lot.

It is zoned R1 (residenƟal). The owner(s) want the property rezoned to Neighborhood Commercial (NC), which would allow it eventually to be redeveloped to 85 feet in height, with the current 55-foot height limit on Ocean Park Blvd. plus state density bonuses. This would be directly across 29th and 30th Streets from 1- and 2-story homes.

Procedural flaws with this spot upzoning include the following:

City Staff conƟnue to state that the parcel R1 (residenƟal) zoning was an “inadvertent error” in the 2010 LUCE, but this appears to be untrue.

The LUCE update involved a lengthy process intended to protect residenƟal neighborhoods from commercial acƟvity, which was limited to the boulevards.

The City Staff and City AƩorney have spent a year helping the property owner upzone the parcel without disclosing this relaƟonship to the public.

City Staff allowed the owner to both skip the applicaƟon process for a zoning change and avoid paying $34,000 in applicaƟon fees.

Upzoning even a porƟon of the 2644 30th parcel creates a “peninsula” of commercial use in a residenƟal neighborhood, and it is spot-zoning.

Upzoning to Neighborhood Commercial would also create addiƟonal density, traffic, parking shortages, noise, and infrastructure strain.

Staff has provided no legiƟmate jusƟficaƟon for this upzoning.

Proceeding virtually guarantees costly liƟgaƟon against the city. It also sets a dangerous precedent, opening floodgates for upzoning throughout all residenƟal neighborhoods. Other developers are waiƟng to follow suit, which will erode residents’ trust in local government and further exacerbate our already strained city resources.

Item 11-D
October 14, 2025
Item 11-D
October 14, 2025

11.D.d
Packet Pg. 1173 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading) 17 Again, I urge you to a) reject the 10-year deed restricƟon limiƟng only housing development at 2644 30th Street, b) oppose the ordinance upzoning of 2644 30th Street, and c) instruct Staff to return with rescission of the LUCE amendment.

Sincerely,
Michael Dobbs.

Item 11-D
October 14, 2025
Item 11-D
October 14, 2025

11.D.d
Packet Pg. 1174 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading) 18 Mitchell Kois
From: Warren Allen <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 11:38 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-D - OPPOSE Covenant and Ordinance Changing the Zoning of 2644 30th St.

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Procedural flaws with this spot upzoning include the following:

The City Staff and City Attorney have spent a year helping the property owner upzone the parcel without disclosing this relationship to the public.

City Staff allowed the owner to both skip the application process for a zoning change and avoid paying $34,000 in application fees.

Item 11-D
October 14, 2025
Item 11-D
October 14, 2025

11.D.d
Packet Pg. 1175 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading) 19 Again, I urge you to a) reject the 10-year deed restriction limiting only housing development at 2644 30th Street, b) oppose the ordinance upzoning of 2644 30th Street, and c) instruct Staff to return with rescission of the LUCE amendment.

Sincerely,
Sarah J Allen
Item 11-D
October 14, 2025
Item 11-D
October 14, 2025

11.D.d
Packet Pg. 1176 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading) 20 Mitchell Kois
From: Warren Allen <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 11:38 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-D - OPPOSE Covenant and Ordinance Changing the Zoning of 2644 30th St.

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Procedural flaws with this spot upzoning include the following:

The City Staff and City Attorney have spent a year helping the property owner upzone the parcel without disclosing this relationship to the public.

City Staff allowed the owner to both skip the application process for a zoning change and avoid paying $34,000 in application fees.

Item 11-D
October 14, 2025
Item 11-D
October 14, 2025

11.D.d
Packet Pg. 1177 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading) 21 Again, I urge you to a) reject the 10-year deed restriction limiting only housing development at 2644 30th Street, b) oppose the ordinance upzoning of 2644 30th Street, and c) instruct Staff to return with rescission of the LUCE amendment.

Sincerely,
Warren M Allen
Item 11-D
October 14, 2025
Item 11-D
October 14, 2025

11.D.d
Packet Pg. 1178 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading) 22 Mitchell Kois
From: John Greene <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 11:31 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-D - OPPOSE Covenant and Ordinance Changing the Zoning of 2644 30th St.

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Procedural flaws with this spot upzoning include the following:

The City Staff and City AƩorney have spent a year helping the property owner upzone the parcel without disclosing this relaƟonship to the public.

City Staff allowed the owner to both skip the applicaƟon process for a zoning change and avoid paying $34,000 in applicaƟon fees.

Item 11-D
October 14, 2025
Item 11-D
October 14, 2025

11.D.d
Packet Pg. 1179 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading) 23 Sincerely,
John Greene
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-D
October 14, 2025
Item 11-D
October 14, 2025

11.D.d
Packet Pg. 1180 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 3] (7347 : 2644 30th Street Parcel Map - Second Reading) 24 Mitchell Kois
From: Ellyn Lerner <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 11:29 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-D - OPPOSE Covenant and Ordinance Changing the Zoning of 2644 30th St.

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

Procedural flaws with this spot upzoning include the following:
 City Staff continue to state that the parcel R1 (residential) zoning was an “inadvertent error” in the 2010 LUCE, but this appears to be untrue. The LUCE update involved a lengthy process intended to protect residential neighborhoods from commercial activity, which was limited to the boulevards.  The City Staff and City Attorney have spent a year helping the property owner upzone the parcel without disclosing this relationship to the public.
 City Staff allowed the owner to both skip the application process for a zoning change and avoid paying $34,000 in application fees.

Again, I urge you to a) reject the 10-year deed restriction limiting only housing development at 2644 30th Street, b) oppose the ordinance upzoning of 2644 30th Street, and c) instruct Staff to return with rescission of the LUCE amendment.

Sincerely,
Item 11-D
October 14, 2025
Item 11-D
October 14, 2025

Santa Monica City CouncilOctober 14, 2025

Santa Monica City Council
October 14, 2025