Agenda packet — Santa Monica City Council, October 14, 2025 (part 7 of 8)

To that end, please work with our community and the County to immediately pause the opening of the unlocked mental illness facilities at 413/825 Ocean Ave.

Sincerely,
Patrick Gigliotti
216 Georgina Avenue
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1609 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 214
Mitchell Kois
From: Mayo Narita <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 9:43 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; [email protected] Subject: Request to Delay Opening of Facilities for the Unhoused with Severe Mental Crises at 413/825 Ocean Ave
Attachments: Request to Delay Opening .docx

EXTERNAL
Please find attached a request to delay opening of facilities for the unhoused with severe mental crises at 413/825 Ocean Ave.

Thank you for your attention,
Megan Watanabe
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1610 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 10/13/2025
The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
RE: Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Facilities for the Unhoused with Severe Mental Crises at 413/825 Ocean Ave Dear Mayor Negrete, Honorable Members of the City Council, and City Manager Chi, I am writing to express my sincerest support for Mayor Negrete who has singlehandedly brought to light the non-transparent nature in which two facilities for the severely mentally ill were approved near schools, senior centers, and parks without any publicly available impact analyses, stakeholder notification, or community input per Welfare & Institutions Code §5604.2(a)(4)). I stand with my fellow Santa Monicans to request a suspension of the facilities at 413 Ocean Ave and 825 Ocean Ave until all six elements in Mayor Negrete’s memo are complete and publicly posted, particularly Item #6, which asks for a citywide comprehensive and transparent site review process for such facilities.

While tonight’s item appears to only be relevant to the two addresses above, this issue has citywide implications as it demonstrates that our city lacks a process to expend taxpayer funds in compliance with state law and the spirit of our City’s Strategic Plan on Homelessness, which require community and professional involvement at every stage. These provisions are designed to guarantee that the voices of those with lived experience of mental illness, along with residents, local businesses, and first responders, are all heard, respected, and accounted for – particularly as our city faces significant financial shortfalls.

The issue is not about opposing care—it is about ensuring that care is delivered responsibly, safely, cost effectively, and with dignity for all. The Mayor’s call for coordination between the City, Los Angeles County, and nonprofit providers ensures that these projects will be guided by expertise, empathy, and accountability. The community should be viewed as partners in this endeavor, to help all parties achieve the outcomes that benefit the wellbeing of all, which is one of the stated mission in the City’s Homelessness Strategic Plan.

By calling for clarity on zoning, transparency in developer practices, and robust public outreach, Mayor Negrete is not creating barriers to progress—she is building trust, ensuring that our city’s compassion is matched by competence in every single neighborhood across this city. This approach strengthens our collective ability to help people heal, stabilize, and reintegrate into the community.

Her leadership reminds us that compassion and accountability are not opposing values—they are inseparable. A community that truly cares about its most vulnerable must also care deeply about how decisions are made, how funds are spent, and how every stakeholder is treated.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1611 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) I stand in full support of Mayor Negrete’s efforts to make Santa Monica a model for both compassionate care and transparent governance. Los Angeles County should not be driving decisions that impact all of our communities without accountability, and thus, we simultaneously call on Third District LA County Supervisor Lindsay Horvath to intervene – to both pause funding for these projects and support Mayor Negrete’s detailed request.

In conclusion, we respectfully request your support for all six requests in Mayor Negrete’s memo and pause the opening of the facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean until all the analyses are posted and shared with the public. Thank you for your service to our city and for considering this important item.

Sincerely,
Megan Watanabe
1250 Capri Drive, Pacific Palisades, CA 90272
[email protected] / 310-415-2846
cc: Third District Los Angeles County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1612 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 215
Mitchell Kois
From: Alex Metaxas <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 9:44 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Request to Pause Approvals for the Mental Health Facilities 413/825 Ocean Ave in Santa Monica and Require a New Process that Follows State Law and the City’s Strategic Plan, Using the Item 16-B Memo as a Framework

EXTERNAL
October 13, 2025
The Honorable Lindsey P. Horvath
Los Angeles County Supervisor, Third District
500 West Temple Street, Room 866
Los Angeles, CA 90012
The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
Dear Supervisor Horvath, Mayor Negrete, Honorable Members of the City Council, and City Manager Chi, I am writing to express concern about the County’s non-transparent process in which two facilities for the severely mentally ill and unhoused were approved in our city near schools, senior centers, and parks without any publicly available impact analyses, stakeholder notification, or community input per Welfare & Institutions Code §5604.2(a)(4)). According to the LA County Department of Mental Health, there are no background checks or sobriety requirements at this facility, which allows for voluntary entry/exit without any plan for care, supervision, or enforcement once an individual leaves the premises. I stand with my fellow Santa Monicans to request the County work with the City of Santa Monica to suspend approvals for the facilities at 413 Ocean Ave and 825 Ocean Ave and to launch a new process that is in compliance with all laws governing public participation, and that address the six elements in Mayor Negrete’s memo.

Our community supports compassionate, accountable care that promotes the well-being of the entire city and county.

While this letter appears to only be relevant to the two addresses above, this issue has citywide implications as it demonstrates that our county and city lack a process to expend taxpayer funds in compliance with state law and the spirit of our City’s Strategic Plan on Homelessness, which require community and professional involvement at every stage.

These provisions are designed to guarantee that the voices of those with lived experience of mental illness, along with residents, local businesses, and first responders, are all heard with a mission for success – particularly as our city faces significant financial shortfalls.

The County should not be able to fund and approve facilities in our city without following proper notification and input required, per state law. The community should be viewed as partners in this endeavor, to help all parties achieve the outcomes that benefit the wellbeing of all, which is one of the stated missions in the City’s Homelessness Strategic Plan. The County and City must work collaboratively with stakeholders across our entire city – including those from Sunset Park, Pico Blvd, and the Palisades Park Community – to ensure transparency, collaboration, and accountability.

In conclusion, we respectfully request that you pause the opening of the facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean, reopen the approvals and analysis of these projects, and support the completion of all six points in Mayor Negrete’s memo associated with Item 16-B. Thank you to Mayor Negrete for bringing this important issue to our attention, and to all of you for your service to our city and for considering this important item Sincerely,
Alex Metaxas
1024 Harvard Street
Santa Monica, CA 90403
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1613 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 216
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1614 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 217
Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 9:43 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Support for Item 16B

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmembers,

I’m writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B. I have lived in Santa Monica for more than 23 years, and my daughter attends elementary school in the city. I am very concerned about the lack of communication and transparency regarding the Behavioral Health Bridge Housing slated to open on Ocean Avenue.

There has been no community engagement or notice regarding these projects. The first public discussion occurred at an October 9, 2025 North of Montana Association meeting. I listened to the entire portion of the meeting related to these facilities, and there was a lack of basic information. For example, there was no explanation about how residents will be screened for placement in these facilities, or what operational policies will be in place to support the success of the residents and the surrounding community. There was discussion of security and rules applied to ensure safety within the facilities, but no discussion of steps to ensure the safety of the surrounding community. I understand from the meeting that residents will not be subject to drug testing or background checks. There are schools in close proximity (including my daughter’s school, which is just a few blocks away), and the location is across the street from Palisades Park.

I ask you to please look into the procedural failures that led to a lack of public notice and a lack of community engagement. I ask that those procedural errors be corrected so that community stakeholders can have a voice and our questions answered before the facilities open. Please support Item 16B to support transparency.

Sincerely,
Enzo Der Boghossian
717 Euclid Street
Santa Monica, CA 90402
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1615 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 218
Mitchell Kois
From: Kim Drobny <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 9:42 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue

EXTERNAL
Dear Santa Monica Councilmembers,
We were not informed of the decision to turn 413 & 825 Ocean Ave into a shelter for severally mentally impaired homeless people is a derelict of duty.

Our beloved park’s safety and neighborhood is now threatened.

I am vehemently opposed of turning these sites into a shelter. It seems our councilmembers are determined to ruin our city.

Kim Drobny
632 11th Street
Santa Monica
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1616 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 219
Mitchell Kois
From: Jonathan David <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 9:40 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; [email protected]
Subject: Support for Mayor Negrete's Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Facilities for the Unhoused with Severe Mental Crises at 413/825 Ocean Ave

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete, Honorable Members of the City Council, and City Manager Chi, I am wriƟng to express concern about the County’s non-transparent process in which two faciliƟes for the severely mentally ill were approved in our city near schools, senior centers, and parks without any publicly available impact analyses, stakeholder noƟficaƟon, or community input per Welfare & InsƟtuƟons Code §5604.2(a)(4)). I stand with my fellow Santa Monicans to request the County work with the City of Santa Monica to pause the conƟnuaƟon of faciliƟes at 413 Ocean Ave and 825 Ocean Ave unƟl all six elements in Mayor Negrete’s memo are complete and publicly posted.

While tonight’s item appears to only be relevant to the two addresses above, this issue has citywide implicaƟons as it demonstrates that our city lacks a process to expend taxpayer funds in compliance with state law and the spirit of our City’s Strategic Plan on Homelessness, which require community and professional involvement at every stage. These provisions are designed to guarantee that the voices of those with lived experience of mental illness, along with residents, local businesses, and first responders, are all heard, respected, and accounted for – parƟcularly as our city faces significant financial shorƞalls.

The County should not be able to fund and approve faciliƟes in our city without following proper noƟficaƟon and input requires, per state law. The community should be viewed as partners in this endeavor, to help all parƟes achieve the outcomes that benefit the wellbeing of all,
which is one of the stated missions in the City’s Homelessness Strategic Plan.

In conclusion, we respecƞully request your support for all six requests in Mayor Negrete’s memo and pause the opening of the faciliƟes at 413 and 825 Ocean. Thank you for your service to our city and for considering this important item.

Sincerely,
Jonathan David
633 14th Street, Santa Monica, CA 90402
310.500.2355
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1617 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 220
Mitchell Kois
From: Anna Vastano <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 9:37 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Item 16-Negrete

EXTERNAL
Questions For the City Council Meeting 10/13
1) Mayor Negrete and other council members have stated that they did not know about the opening of the mental health facilities at 413/825 Ocean Ave. (although St. Joseph’s indicated otherwise) The legal standard is whether the mayor and council members “knew or reasonably should have known”. That said, what is the city doing to stop the opening of this facility? Is the city attorney filing for an injunction or some other legal means of delaying the opening until this matter can be properly vetted? If not, Why not?
2) Schizophrenia by definition includes delusional and irrational thought. How much liability insurance is St. Joseph’s and the property owner carrying? Is St. Joseph’s prepared to defend and indemnify the fiscally depleted city of Santa Monica? Is St. Joseph’s/ Property Owner/LA County going to accept liability/responsibility for the actions of these residents/ clients within the city of Santa Monica??? Thank you,
A Tax paying resident of Santa Monica
The Vastano Family
316 Marguerita Ave
Santa Monica
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1618 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 221
Mitchell Kois
From: Ron Grant <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 9:35 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: RE: Automatic reply: Mental Health Facilities 413/825 Ocean Ave in Santa Monica

EXTERNAL
Bjorn, you need to warn people that the submission will be posted on the City’s website.

Ron
Ronald J. Grant
Ronald J. Grant Law Corporation
310-393-0717 (office)
310-502-0025 (cell)
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages attached to it, may contain information that is confidential, legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure, and is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you must not read this transmission and that any disclosure, copying, printing, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone or return e-mail and delete the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner. Thank you.

From: councilmtgitems <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 9:19 AM
To: Ron Grant <[email protected]>
Subject: Automatic reply: Mental Health Facilities 413/825 Ocean Ave in Santa Monica Thank you for your email. Please be advised that this email will: 1) become part of the public record, 2) be filed with the City’s official records, and 3) be posted online at smgov.net/council/agendas. Comments will not be redacted and appear online as they are submitted.

If you plan to speak at the meeting and have an electronic presentation to show, please submit it to [email protected] no later than 12 PM on the day of the meeting.

Levine Act Disclosure. Pursuant to the Levine Act (Govt Code Section 84308), any party to a permit, license, contract, or other entitlement before the Council is required to disclose on the record any contribution, including aggregated contributions, of more than $250 made by the party or the party's agents within the preceding 12 months to any City official. Participants and agents are requested to make this disclosure as well. The disclosure must include the name of the party, participant, or agent, and any other person making the contribution; the name of the recipient, the amount of the contribution, and the date the contribution was made.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1619 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 222
Thank you,
The City Clerk’s Office
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1620 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 223
Mitchell Kois
From: Ann Song <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 9:34 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; [email protected] Subject: Request to Delay Opening of Facilities at 813 and 825 Ocean Avenue

EXTERNAL
The Honorable Lindsey P. Horvath
Los Angeles County Supervisor, Third District
500 West Temple Street, Room 866
Los Angeles, CA 90012

Oct 12, 2025
Dear Supervisor Horvath,
I am a resident of Santa Monica and I am beyond disappointed by the manner in which your office and the Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health has advanced the voluntary entry/exit facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue—all without any public notice whatsoever, and without any meaningful community engagement. I just learned of it for the very first time several days ago. My question is, how is this possible?
Santa Monica Mayor Lana Negrete noted that even the City itself was “recently made aware” of these County actions after funding had been approved and renovations were already underway. The residents have been completely blindsided and left to learn about these projects through rumors rather than official communication. This does nothing to earn the trust of a community and is a serious breach of transparency.

The Mayor’s memo from Oct 9th highlights that the County and its nonprofit partners failed to comply with Welfare and Institutions Code §5604.2(a)(4), which explicitly requires citizen and professional participation at all stages of the planning process. Where has the citizen and professional involvement been? There has been ZERO citizen and professional participation.

This includes the very critical aspect of engagement with residents, business owners, schools, and others directly impacted by these facilities. As a resident who lives at 801 Ocean Ave, which is just next door to 825 Ocean Ave, I have never once been engaged or made aware of this project or process until I heard about it from another resident, in passing, several days ago.

Instead, I understand that the projects were advanced quietly—without regard for the surrounding preschools, elementary schools, businesses and senior living facilities. The secrecy surrounding this process has eroded public trust and undermined the principles of open governance that your office has publicly committed to uphold.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1621 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 224
While the recently released FAQ states that the sites will provide “24/7 staffing” and “enhanced security,” there remains no coordinated plan to ensure safety beyond the facility grounds—as confirmed during the October 9th Town Hall attended by your staff, LA County DMH, and St. Joseph Center. Transparency after the fact is not transparency—it is damage control.

Just to clarify, I am not opposed to mental health care or supportive housing. I am opposed to being excluded from critical decisions that deeply impact our children, seniors, neighborhoods, schools, small businesses, and overall community safety. This community deserves an explanation—and an immediate pause in the opening of these facilities until proper due diligence, transparency, and public hearings occur in compliance with state law.

As a resident of Santa Monica, I respectfully urge you to:
 Pause the opening of the mental health facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue; and  Launch an investigation into the approval process, vendor selection, and site designation to ensure all legal and procedural requirements have been met with transparency and public engagement.

Thank you for your attention to this critical matter.

Sincerely,
Ann Song
801 Ocean Ave
[email protected]
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1622 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 225
Mitchell Kois
From: Scott Sussman <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 9:31 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; [email protected] Subject: RE: Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Facilities for the Unhoused with Severe Mental Crises at 413/825 Ocean Ave

EXTERNAL
10/13/25
The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
RE: Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Facilities for the Unhoused with Severe Mental Crises at 413/825 Ocean Ave Dear Mayor Negrete, Honorable Members of the City Council, and City Manager Chi, I am writing to express my sincerest support for Mayor Negrete who has singlehandedly brought to light the nontransparent nature in which two facilities for the severely mentally ill were approved near schools, senior centers, and parks without any publicly available impact analyses, stakeholder notification, or community input per Welfare & Institutions Code §5604.2(a)(4)). I stand with my fellow Santa Monicans to request a suspension of the facilities at 413 Ocean Ave and 825 Ocean Ave until all six elements in Mayor Negrete’s memo are complete and publicly posted, particularly Item #6, which asks for a citywide comprehensive and transparent site review process for such facilities.

By calling for clarity on zoning, transparency in developer practices, and robust public outreach, Mayor Negrete is not creating barriers to progress—she is building trust, ensuring that our city’s compassion is matched by competence in Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1623 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 226
every single neighborhood across this city. This approach strengthens our collective ability to help people heal, stabilize, and reintegrate into the community.

I stand in full support of Mayor Negrete’s efforts to make Santa Monica a model for both compassionate care and transparent governance. Los Angeles County should not be driving decisions that impact all of our communities without accountability, and thus, we simultaneously call on Third District LA County Supervisor Lindsay Horvath to intervene – to both pause funding for these projects and support Mayor Negrete’s detailed request.

Sincerely,
Scott Sussman
1299 Ocean Ave Santa Monica, CA 90401
cc: Third District Los Angeles County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath --
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1624 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 227
Mitchell Kois
From: Richard Brest <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 9:29 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: Kanika Soni
Subject: RE: Request to Pause Approvals for the Mental Health Facilities 413/825 Ocean Ave and Require a New Process that Follows State Law and the City’s Strategic Plan, Using the Item 16-B Memo as a Framework

EXTERNAL
Dear Supervisor Horvath, Mayor Negrete, Honorable Members of the City Council, and City Manager Chi, I am writing to express concern about the County’s non-transparent process in which two facilities for the severely mentally ill and unhoused were approved in our city near schools, senior centers, and parks without any publicly available impact analyses, stakeholder notification, or community input per Welfare & Institutions Code §5604.2(a)(4)). According to the LA County Department of Mental Health, there are no background checks or sobriety requirements at this facility, which allows for voluntary entry/exit without any plan for care, supervision, or enforcement once an individual leaves the premises. I stand with my fellow Santa Monicans to request the County work with the City of Santa Monica to suspend approvals for the facilities at 413 Ocean Ave and 825 Ocean Ave and to launch a new process that is in compliance with all laws governing public participation, and that address the six elements in Mayor Negrete’s memo.

Our community supports compassionate, accountable care that promotes the well-being of the entire city and county.

Sincerely,
Richard Brest
740 21st Place, Santa Monica 90402
[email protected]
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1625 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 228
Mitchell Kois
From: Caroline Matthews <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 9:28 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; [email protected]
Subject: Item 16B, Santa Monica City Council Meeting

EXTERNAL
October 13, 2025
The Honorable Lindsey P. Horvath
Los Angeles County Supervisor, Third District
500 West Temple Street, Room 866
Los Angeles, CA 90012
The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
[Sent via email: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]] RE: Request to Pause Approvals for the Mental Health Facilities Proposed at 413 Ocean Ave and 825 Ocean Ave in Santa Monica and Require a New Process That Follows State Law and the City's Strategic Plan, Using the Item 16-B Memo as a Framework
Dear Supervisor Horvath, Mayor Negrete, Honorable Members of the City Council, and City Manager Chi, I am writing to express my deep concern and disappointment about the County's non-transparent process in which two facilities for the severely mentally ill and homeless were approved in our city near schools, senior centers, and parks without any prior public notice, publicly available impact analyses, stakeholder notification, or community input per Welfare & Institutions Code §5604.2(a)(4)). According to the LA County Department of Mental Health, there are no background checks or sobriety requirements at this facility, which allows for voluntary entry/exit without any plan for care, supervision, or enforcement once an individual leaves the premises. I stand with my fellow Santa Monicans to request the County work with the City of Santa Monica to suspend approvals for the facilities at 413 Ocean Ave and 825 Ocean Ave and to launch a new process that is in compliance with all laws governing public participation, and that address the six elements in Mayor Negrete's memo.

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1626 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 229
funds in compliance with state law and the spirit of our City’s Strategic Plan on Homelessness, which requires community and professional involvement at every stage. These provisions are designed to guarantee that the voices of those with lived experience of mental illness, along with residents, local businesses, and first responders, are all heard with a mission for success – particularly as our city faces significant financial shortfalls.

In conclusion, I respectfully request that you pause the opening of the facilities at 413 Ocean Ave and 825 Ocean Ave, reopen the approvals and analyses of these projects, and support the completion of all six points in Mayor Negrete's memo associated with Item 16B. Thank you to Mayor Negrete for bringing this important issue to our attention, and to all of you for considering this important item.

Sincerely,
Caroline Matthews
Wilshire Montana Neighborhood, Santa Monica
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1627 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 230
Mitchell Kois
From: Rose Nelson <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 9:27 AM
To: 'Kelly Smith'; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Facilities for the Unhoused with Severe Mental Crises at 413/825 Ocean Ave

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete, Honorable Members of the City Council, and City Manager Chi, I am writing to express my sincerest support for Mayor Negrete who has singlehandedly brought to light the nontransparent nature in which two facilities for the severely mentally ill were approved near schools, senior centers, and parks without any publicly available impact analyses, stakeholder notification, or community input per Welfare & Institutions Code §5604.2(a)(4)). I stand with my fellow Santa Monicans to request a suspension of the facilities at 413 Ocean Ave and 825 Ocean Ave until all six elements in Mayor Negrete’s memo are complete and publicly posted, particularly Item #6, which asks for a citywide comprehensive and transparent site review process for such facilities.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1628 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 231
Rose Nelson
Resident of Santa Monica- 30+ years.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1629 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 232
Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 9:24 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; [email protected] Subject: Support for Mayor Negrete's Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Facilities for the Unhoused with Severe Mental Crises at 413/825 Ocean Ave

EXTERNAL
To whom it may concern:

I am not sure who is in charge of making this irrational and dumb decision, but this is yet again another one in a string of bad decisions. Over the past 4-5 years, for reasons that no sane person can comprehend, cities in and around southern California have decided to throw common sense out the window in the guise of being “fair and equitable”. What has resulted out of this is are dirtier cities (look around), higher rates of crime with police no longer feeling they have authority to help protect the general population, rampant drug use (when was this okay), and rampant homelessness (defecation is common). All to make the tiniest of the population feel like there is “equity”, while everyone else’s neighborhoods suƯer. Cities have been slowly decaying. It appears to me that Santa Moncia is no exception, just look at what’s happened to 3rd street and promenade as an example. It used to be bustling with tourists and now it is an alley for drug use, crime, and homelessness – visitor counts during high summer season was WAY down. Cities that have decided to buck the trend are Beverly Hills, Culver City, Newport, they appear to be doing much better at ensuring some sense of safety and stability.

1. Why do we need to put our neighbors and kids at any additional risk of issues? I don’t think anybody thinks that this type of service is bad, but why does it need to be next to so many residents, an elementary school, or parks?

2. Why do we need to have this on Ocean Ave, one of the most expensive real estate zip codes in the county? Are we not in a massive budget crises in California? Why do we need to close our eyes on costs when we are already stretched so thin on services? Most would agree that expanding police services would be a better use of the additional costs of operating at the proposed sites (compared to something more sane).

3. Why do we need to rush this without any other input from neighbors? When was it okay to jam this through the process? Do the sites not need CUPs in order to operate this type of business? Please listen to the voices of people. Also, please apply some common sense to what you are trying to accomplish. There are plenty of other locations that can handle this type of facility, with far less density and no neighboring elementary school or parks, and certainly at a far lower cost. You wouldn’t run your own households this way.

SM resident and concerned citizen,
Charles
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1630 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 233
Mitchell Kois
From: Hannah Catterall <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 9:23 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16-Negrete

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmembers,
I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

We have organized hundreds of people in days, soon it will be thousands, and we are all deeply concerned about the planned opening of the homeless shelter on Ocean Avenue intended to serve 49 seriously mentally ill, drug addicted and homeless individuals.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

The first public discussion on this topic took place Thursday, October 9th during a NOMA informational zoom meeting. However, it was clear the intention of St. Joseph’s and LA County was to open the facility illegally and without notice, community input. More so, fully formed operational polices or adequate safety measures to protect the surrounding neighborhood were not and have not been presented or accepted.

St. Joseph’s also shared a timeline that implicated city staff and at least 3 Councilmember’s, all who were informed of the project since February and provided no community outreach, further violating our rights.

Furthermore, I am concerned to have learned from St. Joseph’s that individuals in this shelter will not be subject to drug testing or complete background checks, yet they will be permitted to exit and and enter the facility and community freely during the day. This poses significant risks to our community, especially given the proximity of THREE elementary schools, community parks and local residents. Additionally, it was suggested that others looking for homeless services would benefit from outreach being conducted in the surrounding area, effectively putting more homeless, mentally ill and drug addicts in the neighborhood. You are not simply housing 49 people you are a beacon to everyone looking for homeless services.

It is clear your security plan beyond the shelter is not complete or adequate. The reputation of your owner and “partner” in this facility has been questioned due to questionable actions/decisions operating similar facilities.

Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1631 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 234
It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who attend the impacted schools.

Protect our neighborhood, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Hannah Catterall
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1632 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 235
Mitchell Kois
From: Melanie Wise <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 9:20 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: 413 & 825 Ocean Avenue Mental Health Facilities

EXTERNAL
Oct. 13, 2025
Lindsey P. Horvath
Los Angeles County Supervisor, Third District
500 West Temple Street, Room 866
Los Angeles, CA 90012
[Sent via email: [email protected];
cc: [email protected], [email protected]] Re: Failure of Transparency / Community Engagement Regarding 413 & 825 Ocean Avenue Mental Health Facilities Supervisor Horvath,
I am writing to express my deep concern and disappointment over the manner in which your office and the Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health advanced the voluntary entry/exit facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue for the homeless and severely mentally ill without prior public notice or community engagement. This is an egregious dereliction to the City of Santa Monica. So derelict, in fact, Mayor Negrete was able to claim the City was “…recently made aware …” when the news cameras rolled on Oct. 6, 2025 with the story of one of the facilities.

Los Angeles County’s actions after funding had been approved and renovations were already underway, residents blindsided, left to discover this project through rumor rather than proper notification. This was not a clerical error—it was a profound failure of transparency on the part of the county and a profound failure of Santa Monica leadership to properly manage its confines.

The County and its nonprofit partners neglected to comply with Welfare and Institutions Code §5604.2(a)(4) which explicitly requires citizen and professional involvement at all stages of the planning process, including residents, local businesses, schools, and those directly impacted by such facilities. None of the above were given that opportunity.

Instead, this project was quietly advanced without consideration of the preschools, elementary schools, senior living facilities, Santa Monicans, tourists, tourism (Santa Monica’s chief industry) impacting the potential to generate millions in revenue for a city already under fiscal strain. The secrecy surrounding this process has eroded public trust and undermined the very principles of open governance you have publicly spouted about.

Your office and St. Joseph Center’s newly released FAQ attempting to assure the public that the site will provide “24/7 staffing” and “enhanced security.” It is evident there is NO coordinated plan to provide safety beyond the walls of these facilities (as discussed at the October 9th Town Hall, where your office, the LA County DMH, and St. Joseph’s presented), therefore risking Santa Monica, her people and her industry. Transparency after the fact is not transparency—it’s damage control.

How is it The People of Santa Monica are to be at the whim of Los Angeles County in order to foist upon our city severely mentally ill people requiring no background checks or sobriety requirements (per a statement made by the LA County Department of Mental Health during a community town hall conducted on Thursday, October 9th). While VERY LATE, I do appreciate Mayor Negrete’s recent memo requesting transparency, community engagement, and accountability regarding the facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue.

Common sense dictates that projects supporting severely mentally ill people having rights to come and go as they choose SHOULD NOT BE anywhere near senior facilities, preschools, elementary schools, small businesses, residents, tourists, hotels, parks, Santa Monica’s chief economy of tourism (generating millions in tax revenue supporting our essential services), — all within a half-mile radius. The idea that installation of such a Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1633 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 236
facility, risking GREAT potential WITHOUT full public input, clear information, thoughtful consideration of available citywide resources (e.g., law enforcement, fire and rescue services, etc.), neighborhood safety, tourism, and existing financial stresses, perplexes the mind. Santa Monica City leadership and LABOS should have grave concerns over negligence lawsuits generated should this installation actually occur. Without the rigor of full impact/environmental study of the potential fallout, our city and Los Angeles County may have even graver legal concerns. And rightfully, injured parties may also consider pursuing legal endeavors that entertain personal capacity. On the very good chance that city or county law is being pre-empted, legal matters will ensue.

Our city is already under significant financial stress, and we must ensure that every funding decision protects our broader economic health. We WILL NOT be able to serve ANY vulnerable souls if we cannot maintain our financials.

Negrete’s call for transparency, zoning clarity, and proper community engagement is the only proper path forward. Our fair city is organized by Charter giving a weighted voice to The People of Santa Monica. The entire Council and LABOS should support efforts to bring accountability and balance to this incoming disaster – and minimally pause the opening of these facilities until all due diligence has been conducted, public hearings have been held, AND the public’s desires influence the final outcome. I’d bet big money, after transparency, the ability to install such facilities will evaporate like dew in the sun.

The community-centric measures outlined in the City of Santa Monica’s Homelessness Strategic Plan calls for transparency stating the effort to be:
“Transparent… We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community.” We can clearly observe failure on this point. The mission statement goes further to “promote the wellbeing of all”. And here’s the second noted failure as regards 413/825 Ocean Avenue. THE ONLY WAY this Homelessness Strategic Plan "serves the well being of all" will be TO NOT INSTALL the facility in the presently proposed locations.

I urge you to launch an investigation into the approach that was taken to approve these facilities, vendors, and sites until a full review is conducted with full transparency and meaningful public engagement, put this project to rest. It’s clear the Santa Monica Council and LABOS have the enviable position of plausible deniability given the project is run through an NGO.

Regards,
Melanie Wise
Santa Monican
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1634 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 237
Mitchell Kois
From: Matthew Cowan <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 9:19 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Santa Monica City Manager's Office Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Delay Opening of Proposed Mental Health Facilities with Voluntary Entry/Exit Procedures at 413 & 825 Ocean Ave, Per Item 16-B

EXTERNAL
The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
RE: Request to Delay Opening of Proposed Mental Health Facilities with Voluntary Entry/Exit Procedures at 413 & 825 Ocean Ave, Per Item 16-B Dear Mayor Negrete, City Manager Chi, and Honorable Members of the City Council, First off, I write to offer my heartfelt support and appreciation for Mayor Lana Negrete who has been a staunch supporter of every Santa Monican, as she seeks transparency for all our communities – both retrospectively and prospectively. In her memo associated with Item 16-B, she has constructively outlined a way forward for the entire city to engage on the important decisions surrounding the compassionate care of the city’s unhoused populations, and particularly those with severe mental health challenges.

Joseph’s Center, was brought forward to the County only once a private developer who is currently suing the City of Santa Monica, sought out the County and St. Joseph’s to offer up his sites at 413 Ocean Avenue and 825 Ocean Avenue. During a 10/9 Townhall organized by the North of Montana Association (NOMA), the LA County Department of Mental Health shared – for the first time with the community – that no background checks or sobriety requirements would be in place at these new facilities, and that those accepted at these facilities could voluntary enter and exit with no supervision plan beyond the facilities’ walls.

While those in Santa Monica must notify their surrounding neighbors for a mere hedge modification or expansion of a school sports court, no courtesy was provided to the community on this project that has significant reverberations throughout the entire City. The secrecy in which this project was approved without any public notification and its citywide financial/staffing burden is grossly negligent.

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1635 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 238
ensuring accountability, public safety, and community trust for the entire population of Santa Monica.

While this item is specific to one community currently, every single community in Santa Monica deserves notification and public input in any projects that affect their community, writ large.

Sunset Park, Pico Blvd, and Palisades Park have shown that while it is these communities today, it can be any neighborhood tomorrow.

We request the City and County work together to request a suspension of the project at 413/825 Ocean Ave. until all of the items in 16-B have been discussed in public hearings and a new analysis explaining the rationale behind this project, the alternative sites that were considered, and if the County made a decision that is in compliance with the needs defined by the City, its residents, and other stakeholders.

Specifically, as it relates to Item 16-B:

1. Comprehensive Outreach and Communication
We strongly support Direction #1, which calls for coordination between the City, LA County Department of Mental Health (DMH), St. Joseph Center, and the project developer to ensure robust outreach to residents and nearby businesses—including the numerous schools, hotels, small businesses, and other stakeholders along Ocean Avenue and its surrounding radius. Residents and local business owners deserve timely notice and a chance to understand project goals, operations, and impacts.

Transparent engagement fosters cooperation rather than conflict and ensures that city decisions reflect both compassion and local input.

2. Compliance with Proposition 1 and the Good Neighbor Policy Direction #2 correctly emphasizes compliance with all state laws. These laws explicitly require citizen and professional involvement at all stages of the planning process (Welfare & Institutions Code §5604.2(a)(4)). Enforcing these mandates ensures that mental health projects are developed with appropriate compassion for affected communities with input from residents, law enforcement, educators, housing experts, business owners, and those with lived experience. This is fidelity to the law and the spirit of partnership that newly passed state law requires.

3. Clarification of Zoning and Public Notification Requirements Direction #3 requests clarification of zoning classifications, use types, and public notice procedures for supportive, shelter, and transitional housing projects. Clear zoning definitions protect both residents and service providers by establishing predictable rules and preventing misunderstandings about what types of uses are permitted “by right.” Ensuring that every neighborhood receives formal notice when a project is proposed is an essential safeguard for democratic participation. Every Santa Monican deserves to understand what are allowable uses for the buildings in their communities, particularly around communities that serve children and seniors.

4. Public Explanation of Land Use and Operational Standards Direction #4 calls for a clear public explanation of the legal basis that allows these facilities to operate without a discretionary City permit. Residents must understand the distinctions between a mental health facility, a transitional housing facility, an emergency shelter, and supportive housing—and how each is governed under City and State law. The Mayor’s proposed public communications strategy—including a dedicated FAQ webpage, hotline for concerns, and clear follow-up protocols—is precisely the kind of accessible, fact-based communication the community needs. The fact that no one has yet been able to access any public documentation regarding the process and application in which these facilities were approved and funded with taxpayer funds speaks to the lack of transparency the law requires.

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1636 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 239
resources, and that site selection is driven by thoughtful due diligence, published documentation, and needs analyses that demonstrate funding needs are matched to the highest and best use, instead of driven by calls from developers who are seeking subsidized operations while they seek entitlements.

6. Retrospective Review and Corrective Action
Direction #6 ensures that the entire City of Santa Monica benefits from a thoughtful approach to compassionate care. We must learn from past experience by reviewing similar projects in Sunset Park and the Pico Neighborhood. If community engagement was inadequate in earlier projects, the City should take corrective steps now—establishing consistent contact systems, feedback channels, and neighborhood support mechanisms. This proactive stance prevents repeated errors and strengthens long-term public trust. Given the City’s financial challenges with cut services, particularly in public safety, we must provide support to all affected services across the City that no department is overly burdened by County-driven decisions that silence City taxpayers.

Conclusion
The Mayor’s memo provides a clear roadmap toward a balanced approach—one that supports mental health initiatives while demanding accountability, transparency, and respect for Santa Monica residents. I respectfully urge the City Council to adopt all six directives in full and to hold LA County and its nonprofit partners to the highest standards of openness, compliance, and community collaboration.

In addition, on page 5 of the City of Santa Monica’s Homelessness Strategic Plan one of the first stated values of the plan is to be transparent. I quote: “Transparent. We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community.” The mission statement of the strategic plan also claims to “promote the well-being of all”, but that clearly was not followed in the case of 413/825 Ocean Avenue.

To that end, please work with our community and the County to immediately pause the opening of the unlocked mental illness facilities at 413/825 Ocean Ave.

Sincerely,
Matthew Cowan
400 block of 9th Street, Santa Monica, CA 90402
cc: LA County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath, Third District Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1637 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 240
Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 9:18 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; [email protected] Subject: Support for Mayor Negrete's Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Facilities for the Unhoused with Severe Mental Crises at 413/825 Ocean Ave

EXTERNAL
To whom it may concern:

SM resident and concerned citizen,
Charles

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1638 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 241
Mitchell Kois
From: wise malissa <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 9:17 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Agenda Item 16B

EXTERNAL
RE: Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Shelters for the Severely Mentally Ill at 413/825 Ocean Ave
Dear Mayor Negrete, City Manager Chi, and Honorable Members of the City Council, I want to express my strong opposition to the above mentioned facilities. It should be illegal the process that approved and funded these two mental health facilities - which require no background checks or sobriety requirements, per a statement made by the LA County Department of Mental Health during a community town hall conducted on Thursday, October 9th. As such, I also write to express my strong concern that our Mayor Lana Negrete’s had no idea this project was underway and almost in service. I do hope our leadership can attain transparency, community engagement, and accountability. We need to stop what is happening with regard to the facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue and re-start with a process that is community oriented.

Our beautiful city is already enduring tremendous amounts of crime, acts of violence and illicit activities. We do not need our children, seniors, residents, businesses and tourists to be subjected to more safety concerns related to mental health facilities with an open door policy.

While our community cares deeply about helping those struggling with mental illness and homelessness, these projects are located in areas surrounded by senior facilities, preschools, and elementary schools—all within a half-mile radius. This makes it especially important that decisions like this are made with full public input, clear information, and thoughtful consideration of available citywide resources (e.g., law enforcement), neighborhood safety, and tourism impacts particularly as our city is under significant financial stress.

The areas near Palisades Park are not only home to schools, senior living facilities, small businesses, and residents but also significantly support Santa Monica’s tourism economy, generating millions in annual tax revenue that support essential city services. Our city is already under significant financial stress, and we must ensure that every funding decision protects both our most vulnerable residents and our broader economic health.

Mayor Negrete’s call for transparency, zoning clarity, and proper community engagement is the only proper path forward. Our fair city is organized by Charter giving a weighted voice to The People of Santa Monica. The entire Council must support efforts to bring accountability and balance to this important issue – and pause the opening of these facilities until all due diligence has been conducted and public hearings have been held.

We must follow the transparency, community-centric measures outlined in the City of Santa Monica’s Homelessness Strategic Plan, where one of the first stated values of the plan is to be transparent. To expand, the document states the goal of the effort is to be: “Transparent… We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community.” The mission statement of the strategic plan also claims to “promote the wellbeing of all”, but that clearly was not followed in the case of 413/825 Ocean Avenue.

Thank you for your service to our city and for considering this important item. Good luck to you and watch your back.

Sincerely,
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1639 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 242
Malissa Wise
Santa Monican
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1640 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 243
Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 9:17 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: 'Adam Paper'
Subject: Agenda Item No. 16B

EXTERNAL
October 13th, 2025, 9:16am PST
The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
RE: Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Shelters for the Severely Mentally Ill at 413/825 Ocean Ave
Dear Mayor Negrete, City Manager Chi, and Honorable Members of the City Council, I want to express my strong opposition to the process in which approvals and funding were secured for two mental health facilities which require no background checks or sobriety requirements, per a statement made by the LA County Department of Mental Health during a community town hall conducted on Thursday, October 9th. As such, I also write to express my strong support for Mayor Lana Negrete’s leadership and her recent memo requesting transparency, community engagement, and accountability regarding the facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue.

While I feel our community cares deeply about helping those struggling with mental illness and homelessness, these projects are located in areas surrounded by senior facilities, preschools, and elementary schools—all within a half-mile radius. This makes it especially important that decisions like this are made with full public input, clear information, and thoughtful consideration of available citywide resources (e.g., law enforcement), neighborhood safety, and tourism impacts particularly as our city is under significant financial stress.

Mayor Negrete’s call for transparency, zoning clarity, and proper community engagement is exactly what Santa Monica needs right now. I hope the entire Council supports her efforts to bring accountability and balance to this important issue – and pause the opening of these facilities until all due diligence has been conducted and public hearings have been held.

We must follow the transparency, community-centric measures outlined in the City of Santa Monica’s Homelessness Strategic Plan, where one of the first stated values of the plan is to be transparent. To expand, the documents states the goal of the effort is to be: “Transparent… We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community.” The mission statement of the strategic plan also claims to “promote the wellbeing of all”, but that clearly was not followed in the case of 413/825 Ocean Avenue.

Thank you for your service to our city and for considering this important item.

Sincerely,
Adam Paper
Santa Monica Resident
[email protected]
______________________
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1641 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 244
Mitchell Kois
From: STEPHEN LABLE <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 9:16 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: Opposition to the Two Behavioural Health Bridge Facilities - Santa Monica

EXTERNAL
Dear City Council Members,
I have recently come to learn about the two behavioural health centers being planned at 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue. I am wriƟng to express my deep concern as to the locaƟon of these two faciliƟes and the impact that it may have on the neighborhood. I fully support providing mental health services to those in need but have many quesƟons about the feasibility of the proposed site. I am wriƟng in support of Mayor Negrete’s addiƟon of item 16B to the agenda of the October 14th meeƟng and in opposiƟon to the locaƟon of these two faciliƟes. Surely there must be a more appropriate site within the city limit that does not include beach front property. At a Ɵme when the city is struggling financially, this project seems like absolute madness and not the direcƟon our community should be going.

Stephen Lable
303 9th Street
Santa Monica, CA 90402
+310 606 1925
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1642 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 245
Mitchell Kois
From: Seth Zeleznik <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 9:08 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: flavia Lopes
Subject: Request to Pause Approvals for the Mental Health Facilities 413/825 Ocean Ave Attachments: City Council - 16B - 10 13 25.docx

EXTERNAL
Good Morning - please find attached a letter expressing our concern around the approval process for the mental health facilities on Ocean Avenue, request a pause of this deeply flawed process and a new process that complies with state laws and the City's strategic plan.

Sincerely,
Seth and Flavia Zeleznik
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1643 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) October 13, 2025
The Honorable Lindsey P. Horvath
Los Angeles County Supervisor, Third District
500 West Temple Street, Room 866
Los Angeles, CA 90012
The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
[Sent via email: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]] RE: Request to Pause Approvals for the Mental Health Facilities 413/825 Ocean Ave in Santa Monica and Require a New Process that Follows State Law and the City’s Strategic Plan, Using the Item 16-B Memo as a Framework Dear Supervisor Horvath, Mayor Negrete, Honorable Members of the City Council, and City Manager Chi,
I am writing to express concern about the County’s non-transparent process in which two facilities for the severely mentally ill and unhoused were approved in our city near schools, senior centers, and parks without any publicly available impact analyses, stakeholder notification, or community input per Welfare & Institutions Code §5604.2(a)(4)). According to the LA County Department of Mental Health, there are no background checks or sobriety requirements at this facility, which allows for voluntary entry/exit without any plan for care, supervision, or enforcement once an individual leaves the premises. I stand with my fellow Santa Monicans to request the County work with the City of Santa Monica to suspend approvals for the facilities at 413 Ocean Ave and 825 Ocean Ave and to launch a new process that is in compliance with all laws governing public participation, and that address the six elements in Mayor Negrete’s memo.

Our community supports compassionate, accountable care that promotes the well-being of the entire city and county. While this letter appears to only be relevant to the two addresses above, this issue has citywide implications as it demonstrates that our county and city lack a process to expend taxpayer funds in compliance with state law and the spirit of our City’s Strategic Plan on Homelessness, which require community and professional involvement at every stage. These provisions are designed to guarantee that the voices of those with lived experience of mental illness, along with residents, local businesses, and first responders, are all heard with a mission for success – particularly as our city faces significant financial shortfalls.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1644 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) The County should not be able to fund and approve facilities in our city without following proper notification and input requires, per state law. The community should be viewed as partners in this endeavor, to help all parties achieve the outcomes that benefit the wellbeing of all, which is one of the stated missions in the City’s Homelessness Strategic Plan. The County and City must work collaboratively with stakeholders across our entire city – including those from Sunset Park, Pico Blvd, and the Palisades Park Community – to ensure transparency, collaboration, and accountability.

Sincerely,
Seth and Flavia Zeleznik
533 Euclid Street, Santa Monica, CA 90402
cc: Third District Los Angeles County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1645 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 246
Mitchell Kois
From: Erika S. <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 9:02 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; [email protected] Subject: Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Facilities for the Unhoused with Severe Mental Crises at 413/825 Ocean Ave

EXTERNAL
The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
RE: Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Facilities for the Unhoused with Severe Mental Crises at 413/825 Ocean Ave Dear Mayor Negrete, Honorable Members of the City Council, and City Manager Chi, I am writing to express my sincerest support for Mayor Negrete who has singlehandedly brought to light the non-transparent nature in which two facilities for the severely mentally ill were approved near schools, senior centers, and parks without any publicly available impact analyses, stakeholder notification, or community input per Welfare & Institutions Code §5604.2(a)(4)). I stand with my fellow Santa Monicans to request a suspension of the facilities at 413 Ocean Ave and 825 Ocean Ave until all six elements in Mayor Negrete’s memo are complete and publicly posted, particularly Item #6, which asks for a citywide comprehensive and transparent site review process for such facilities.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1646 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 247
Her leadership reminds us that compassion and accountability are not opposing values—they are inseparable. A community that truly cares about its most vulnerable must also care deeply about how decisions are made, how funds are spent, and how every stakeholder is treated.

Sincerely,
Erika Spitzer
Resident & Parent of Children in nearby school
cc: Third District Los Angeles County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1647 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 248
Mitchell Kois
From: morris chen <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 8:58 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Pause Approvals for the Mental Health Facilities 413/825 Ocean Ave in Santa Monica and Require a New Process that Follows State Law and the City’s Strategic Plan, Using the Item 16-B Memo as a Framework

EXTERNAL
October 13, 2025
The Honorable Lindsey P. Horvath
Los Angeles County Supervisor, Third District
500 West Temple Street, Room 866
Los Angeles, CA 90012
The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
RE: Request to Pause Approvals for the Mental Health Facilities 413/825 Ocean Ave in Santa Monica and Require a New Process that Follows State Law and the City’s Strategic Plan, Using the Item 16-B Memo as a Framework Dear Supervisor Horvath, Mayor Negrete, Honorable Members of the City Council, and City Manager Chi, I am writing to express concern about the County’s non-transparent process in which two facilities for the severely mentally ill and unhoused were approved in our city near schools, senior centers, and parks without any publicly available impact analyses, stakeholder notification, or community input per Welfare & Institutions Code §5604.2(a)(4)). According to the LA County Department of Mental Health, there are no background checks or sobriety requirements at this facility, which allows for voluntary entry/exit without any plan for care, supervision, or enforcement once an individual leaves the premises. I stand with my fellow Santa Monicans to request the County work with the City of Santa Monica to suspend approvals for the facilities at 413 Ocean Ave and 825 Ocean Ave and to launch a new process that is in compliance with all laws governing public participation, and that address the six elements in Mayor Negrete’s memo.

Our community supports compassionate, accountable care that promotes the well-being of the entire city and county.

The County should not be able to fund and approve facilities in our city without following proper notification and input requires, per state law. The community should be viewed as partners in this endeavor, to help all parties achieve the outcomes that benefit the wellbeing of all, which is one of the stated missions in the City’s Homelessness Strategic Plan. The County and City must work collaboratively with stakeholders across our entire city – including those from Sunset Park, Pico Blvd, and the Palisades Park Community – to ensure transparency, collaboration, and accountability.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1648 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 249
In conclusion, we respectfully request that you pause the opening of the facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean, reopen the approvals and analysis of these projects, and support the completion of all six points in Mayor Negrete’s memo associated with Item 16-B. Thank you to Mayor Negrete for bringing this important issue to our attention, and to all of you for your service to our city and for considering this important item.

Sincerely,
Morris Chen
215 22nd Street, Santa Monica 90402
[email protected]
cc: Third District Los Angeles County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1649 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 250
Mitchell Kois
From: Sanam Safavi <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 8:57 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; [email protected]; [email protected]; Council Mailbox Subject: RE: Request to Pause Approvals for the Mental Health Facilities 413/825 Ocean Ave in Santa Monica and Require a New Process that Follows State Law and the City’s Strategic Plan, Using the Item 16-B Memo as a Framework

Our community supports compassionate, accountable care that promotes the well-being of the entire city and county.

In conclusion, we respectfully request that you pause the opening of the facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean, reopen the approvals and analysis of these projects, and support the completion of all six points in Mayor Negrete’s memo associated with Item 16-B. Thank you to Mayor Negrete for bringing this important issue to our attention, and to all of you Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1650 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 251
for your service to our city and for considering this important item.

Sincerely,
Sanam Safavi
428 14th street
(818)416-5796
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1651 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 252
Mitchell Kois
From: Norman Levine <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 8:55 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: Homeless shelters on Ocean Avenue

EXTERNAL
I agree that the City of Santa Monica needs to address the homeless situation and the solution must exist at least partly within the community, but I am opposed to the Ocean Avenue locations and opposed to the procedure that was followed to reach this point.

Norman Levine, 104 Larkin Place, Santa Monica
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1652 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 253
Mitchell Kois
From: Kelly Smith <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 8:52 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Facilities for the Unhoused with Severe Mental Crises at 413/825 Ocean Ave

Sincerely,
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1653 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 254
Kelly Smith
1105 Idaho Avenue, Santa Monica, CA 90403
[email protected]
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1654 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 255
Mitchell Kois
From: Carey Kim <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 8:41 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; [email protected] Cc: charles kim; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Facilities for the Unhoused with Severe Mental Crises at 413/825 Ocean Ave

EXTERNAL
10/13/25
The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
RE: Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Facilities for the Unhoused with Severe Mental Crises at 413/825 Ocean Ave Dear Mayor Negrete, Honorable Members of the City Council, and City Manager Chi, I am writing to express my sincerest support for Mayor Negrete who has singlehandedly brought to light the non-transparent nature in which two facilities for the severely mentally ill were approved near schools, senior centers, and parks without any publicly available impact analyses, stakeholder notification, or community input per Welfare & Institutions Code §5604.2(a)(4)). I stand with my fellow Santa Monicans to request a suspension of the facilities at 413 Ocean Ave and 825 Ocean Ave until all six elements in Mayor Negrete’s memo are complete and publicly posted, particularly Item #6, which asks for a citywide comprehensive and transparent site review process for such facilities.

The issue is not about opposing care—it is about ensuring that care is delivered responsibly, safely, cost eƯectively, and with dignity for all. The Mayor’s call for coordination between the City, Los Angeles County, and nonprofit providers ensures that these projects will be guided by expertise, empathy, and accountability. The community should be viewed as partners in this endeavor, to help all parties achieve the outcomes that benefit the wellbeing of all, which is one of the stated mission in the City’s Homelessness Strategic Plan.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1655 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 256
By calling for clarity on zoning, transparency in developer practices, and robust public outreach, Mayor Negrete is not creating barriers to progress—she is building trust, ensuring that our city’s compassion is matched by competence in every single neighborhood across this city. This approach strengthens our collective ability to help people heal, stabilize, and reintegrate into the community.

I stand in full support of Mayor Negrete’s eƯorts to make Santa Monica a model for both compassionate care and transparent governance. Los Angeles County should not be driving decisions that impact all of our communities without accountability, and thus, we simultaneously call on Third District LA County Supervisor Lindsay Horvath to intervene – to both pause funding for these projects and support Mayor Negrete’s detailed request.

Thank you for your service to our city and for considering this important item.

Sincerely,
Carey Kim
Santa Monica, CA
cc: Third District Los Angeles County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1656 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 257
Mitchell Kois
From: Rebecca Brown <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 8:31 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: Urgent Concerns Regarding Mental Health Facilities at 413 & 825 Ocean Avenue

EXTERNAL
Dear City Councilmembers,
I’m reaching out with a heavy heart and growing concern after learning about the imminent opening of homeless mental health facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue.

It seems these plans were made without any real community consultation or public transparency. Naturally, this has left many of us feeling blindsided, and frankly, ignored.

Let me be clear: this isn’t about lacking compassion. Santa Monica has always led with heart. We know mental health and homelessness are serious issues that demand thoughtful, sustainable solutions. But opening facilities of this scale in a dense residential neighborhood, without input from the very people who live there, has sparked a wave of concern that is impossible to ignore.

You may be thinking, “They’re just overreacting,” or “It’s a done deal.” But what you’re hearing from residents is more than just pushback—it’s fear, frustration, and a sense of betrayal. Sadness. A feeling like the people we elected forgot about us.

Would it be unreasonable to ask for a temporary halt until a proper public review can take place? We need transparency. We need clarity. And we need assurance that this decision is being made with—not around—the community.

Please hear this for what it is: not resistance to the cause, but resistance to the process.

We’re asking for your leadership, your voice, and your willingness to ask the hard questions before these doors open.

Thank you,
Rebecca Brown
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1657 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 258
Mitchell Kois
From: Stacey Stanley <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 8:23 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; [email protected] Subject: 413 / 825 Ocean Ave Support for Mayor Negrete's Agenda Item 16 Attachments: SMCC Mayor Letter.pdf

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete, Honorable Members of the City Council, and City Manager Chi, I am writing to express my sincerest support for Mayor Negrete who has brought to light the non-transparent nature in which two facilities for the severely mentally ill were approved near schools, senior centers, and parks without any publicly available impact analyses, stakeholder notification, or community input per Welfare & Institutions Code §5604.2(a)(4)). I stand with my fellow Santa Monicans to request a suspension of the facilities at 413 Ocean Ave and 825 Ocean Ave until all six elements in Mayor Negrete’s memo are complete and publicly posted, particularly Item #6, which asks for a citywide comprehensive and transparent site review process for such facilities.

Please see my full letter attached.
- Jeffrey Farr
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1658 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 10/13/2025
The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
[Sent via email: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]]
RE: Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Facilities for the Unhoused with Severe Mental Crises at 413/825 Ocean Ave Dear Mayor Negrete, Honorable Members of the City Council, and City Manager Chi, I am writing to express my sincerest support for Mayor Negrete who has singlehandedly brought to light the non-transparent nature in which two facilities for the severely mentally ill were approved near schools, senior centers, and parks without any publicly available impact analyses, stakeholder notification, or community input per Welfare & Institutions Code §5604.2(a)(4)). I stand with my fellow Santa Monicans to request a suspension of the facilities at 413 Ocean Ave and 825 Ocean Ave until all six elements in Mayor Negrete’s memo are complete and publicly posted, particularly Item #6, which asks for a citywide comprehensive and transparent site review process for such facilities.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1659 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) Her leadership reminds us that compassion and accountability are not opposing values—they are inseparable. A community that truly cares about its most vulnerable must also care deeply about how decisions are made, how funds are spent, and how every stakeholder is treated.

Sincerely,
Jeffrey Paul Farr
436 Georgina Ave, Santa Monica CA 90402
[email protected]
cc: Third District Los Angeles County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1660 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 259
Mitchell Kois
From: Greta WZ <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 8:22 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: 16-Negrete

EXTERNAL
I oppose this measure to set up this in my neighborhood.

Greta Witt
303 18th street
Santa Monica ca
90402
Monday, Oct 13 - *NOON DEADLINE*
To submit your objection into the public record in advance of Tuesday’s City of Santa Monica Council submit an email to the two addresses below with the subject line: "Item 16-Negrete":
[email protected]
[email protected]
Tuesday, October 14th at 5:30pm
Attend the Santa Monica City Council meeting, where the 413/825 Ocean Ave homeless shelters for the severely mentally ill will be discussed. A copy of the agenda, which links to Mayor Lana Negrete’s request to re-open analysis of the project can be found here. (https://santamonicacityca.iqm2.com/Citizens/Detail_Meeting.aspx?ID=1454) Here are ways you can participate:
• Participate in Person: The meeting is held in the City Council Chambers at 1685 Main Street, Room 250, Santa Monica, CA.
[email protected]
Get Outlook for iOS
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1661 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 260
Mitchell Kois
From: Barbara Mack <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 8:00 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue

EXTERNAL
I oppose the establishment of the two homeless shelters on Ocean Avenue Barbara Mack
100 Larkin Place
Santa Monica, CA 90402
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1662 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 261
Mitchell Kois
From: Laura S M <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 7:48 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Re: Request to Delay Opening of Proposed Mental Health Facilities with Voluntary Entry/Exit Procedures at 413/825 Ocean Ave Per Item 16-B

EXTERNAL
Forgot the date
On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 7:43 AM Laura S M <[email protected]> wrote:

Monday Oct 13,2025 7:45 AM
Dear Mayor Negrete, City Manager Chi, and Honorable Members of the City Council, I am writing as a Santa Monica resident to express my concerns about the secretive negotiations between unnamed City Council Members, the City’s Housing and Human Services Department (HHS), the County Department of Mental Health (DMH) to fund – with taxpayer money – a 49-bed facility for the unhoused and several mentally ill. This project, according to the CEO of St. Joseph’s Center, was brought forward to the County only once a private developer who is currently suing the City of Santa Monica, sought out the County and St. Joseph’s to offer up his sites at 413 Ocean Avenue and 825 Ocean Avenue.

I write to also offer my heartfelt support and appreciation for Mayor Lana Negrete who is the only voice on the City Council who has been transparent and forthcoming with our community about these facilities and constructively outlining a way forward for the entire city to engage on such important funding decisions.

While residents of Santa Monica must notify their surrounding neighbors for a mere hedge modification or expansion of a school sports court, no courtesy was provided to the community on this project that has significant reverberations throughout the entire City. The secrecy in which this project was approved without any public notification, permitting requirements, or consideration of the surrounding community and its citywide financial burden is grossly negligent.

As such, we want to record our opposition to this project and provide full support for Item 16-B on the October 14, 2025 City Council agenda, corresponding to Mayor Negrete’s October 9, 2025 excellent and fair memorandum titled “Request for City Council Direction on Community Engagement, Zoning Clarity, and Accountability for LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects.” This proposal offers a thoughtful and balanced framework that promotes compassion and transparency while ensuring accountability, public safety, and community trust for the entire population of Santa Monica. While this project is specific to the community near Palisades Park, every single community in Santa Monica deserves notification and public input in any projects that affect their community, writ large. While it is this community today, it can be any community tomorrow.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1663 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 262
We request the City and County work together to request a delay of the project at 413/825 Ocean Ave. until all of the items in 16-B have been discussed in public hearings and a new analysis explaining the rationale behind this project, the alternative sites that were considered, and if the County made a decision that is in compliance with the needs defined by the City and its residents.

Specifically, as it relates to Item 16-B:

The Mayor’s proposed public communications strategy—including a dedicated FAQ webpage, hotline for concerns, and clear follow-up protocols—is precisely the kind of accessible, fact-based communication the community needs. The fact that no one has yet been able to access any public documentation regarding the process and application in which these facilities were approved and funded with taxpayer funds speaks to the lack of transparency the law requires.

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1664 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 263
confidence in both the City’s and County’s stewardship of public resources, and that site selection is driven by thoughtful due diligence, published documentation, and needs analyses that demonstrate funding needs are matched to the highest and best use, instead of driven by calls from developers who are seeking subsidized operations while they seek entitlements.

6. Retrospective Review and Corrective Action
Direction #6 ensures that the entire City of Santa Monica benefits from a thoughtful approach to compassionate care. We must learn from past experience by reviewing similar projects in Sunset Park and the Pico Neighborhood. If community engagement was inadequate in earlier projects, the City should take corrective steps now— establishing consistent contact systems, feedback channels, and neighborhood support mechanisms. This proactive stance prevents repeated errors and strengthens long-term public trust. Given the City’s financial challenges with cut services, particularly in public safety, we must provide support to all affected services across the City that no department is overly burdened by County-driven decisions that silence City taxpayers.

In addition, on page 5 of the City of Santa Monica’s Homelessness Strategic Plan one of the first stated values of the plan is to be transparent. I quote: “Transparent. We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community.” The mission statement of the strategic plan also claims to “promote the wellbeing of all”, but that clearly was not followed in the case of 413/825 Ocean Avenue.

Thank you for your leadership in ensuring Santa Monica’s approach to mental health and homelessness remains both compassionate and responsible. To that end, please work with our community and the County to pause the opening of the unlocked mental illness facilities at 413/825 Ocean Ave.

Sincerely,
Laura Miller
144 Alta Ave
Santa Monica CA 90402
Tel. 310-4980931
[email protected]
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1665 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 264
Mitchell Kois
From: Laura S M <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 7:43 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Delay Opening of Proposed Mental Health Facilities with Voluntary Entry/Exit Procedures at 413/825 Ocean Ave Per Item 16-B

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete, City Manager Chi, and Honorable Members of the City Council, I am writing as a Santa Monica resident to express my concerns about the secretive negotiations between unnamed City Council Members, the City’s Housing and Human Services Department (HHS), the County Department of Mental Health (DMH) to fund – with taxpayer money – a 49-bed facility for the unhoused and several mentally ill. This project, according to the CEO of St. Joseph’s Center, was brought forward to the County only once a private developer who is currently suing the City of Santa Monica, sought out the County and St. Joseph’s to offer up his sites at 413 Ocean Avenue and 825 Ocean Avenue.

The secrecy in which this project was approved without any public notification, permitting requirements, or consideration of the surrounding community and its citywide financial burden is grossly negligent.

We request the City and County work together to request a delay of the project at 413/825 Ocean Ave. until all of the items in 16-B have been discussed in public hearings and a new analysis explaining the rationale behind this project, the Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1666 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 265
alternative sites that were considered, and if the County made a decision that is in compliance with the needs defined by the City and its residents.

Specifically, as it relates to Item 16-B:

4. Public Explanation of Land Use and Operational Standards Direction #4 calls for a clear public explanation of the legal basis that allows these facilities to operate without a discretionary City permit. Residents must understand the distinctions between a mental health facility, a transitional housing facility, an emergency shelter, and supportive housing—and how each is governed under City and State law. The Mayor’s proposed public communications strategy—including a dedicated FAQ webpage, hotline for concerns, and clear follow-up protocols—is precisely the kind of accessible, factbased communication the community needs. The fact that no one has yet been able to access any public documentation regarding the process and application in which these facilities were approved and funded with taxpayer funds speaks to the lack of transparency the law requires.

5. Verification of Developer Qualifications and Financial Transparency Direction #5’s call for verification of the developer’s goals, operational record, legal standing, and compensation from LA County is essential for accountability. Residents have a right to know who is behind these projects, how public funds are being used, and whether any conflicts of interest or active litigation exist. This transparency builds confidence in both the City’s and County’s stewardship of public resources, and that site selection is driven by thoughtful due diligence, published documentation, and needs analyses that demonstrate funding needs are matched to the highest and best use, Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1667 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 266
instead of driven by calls from developers who are seeking subsidized operations while they seek entitlements.

6. Retrospective Review and Corrective Action
Direction #6 ensures that the entire City of Santa Monica benefits from a thoughtful approach to compassionate care. We must learn from past experience by reviewing similar projects in Sunset Park and the Pico Neighborhood. If community engagement was inadequate in earlier projects, the City should take corrective steps now— establishing consistent contact systems, feedback channels, and neighborhood support mechanisms. This proactive stance prevents repeated errors and strengthens long-term public trust. Given the City’s financial challenges with cut services, particularly in public safety, we must provide support to all affected services across the City that no department is overly burdened by County-driven decisions that silence City taxpayers.

In addition, on page 5 of the City of Santa Monica’s Homelessness Strategic Plan one of the first stated values of the plan is to be transparent. I quote: “Transparent. We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community.” The mission statement of the strategic plan also claims to “promote the wellbeing of all”, but that clearly was not followed in the case of 413/825 Ocean Avenue.

Sincerely,
Laura Miller
144 Alta Ave
Santa Monica CA 90402
Tel. 310-4980931
[email protected]
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1668 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 267
Mitchell Kois
From: Isabelle Carroll <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 7:34 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Opposition to the proposed two sites for homeless shelter for the severely mentally ill

EXTERNAL
As a resident of Santa Monica, I oppose the opening of 413 825 Ocean Avenue to be used as a homeless shelter for the mentally ill.

There was absolutely no transparency from the beginning it was hidden from the community and the council, which is outrageous.

That lack of transparency in itself shows the uncertainty of how the community would’ve reacted to the proposal Saint Joseph’s is fully aware of that fact that’s why there was no transparency.

The fact that the housing of the mentally ill trumps any concern for the safety of the community is outrageous.

As a resident, I support the effort to house the homeless but a mentally ill facility in a densely populated community is unacceptable. Another opƟon could’ve been a women’s shelter or a group home for families that are working and in need of housing. The community would’ve been less likely to reject a proposal of that nature if there was full transparency.

Surely there is another viable locaƟon for these individuals. St. Joseph’s is certainly aware that mentally ill homeless resist housing.

They have difficulty with structure and being told what to do. I am very skepƟcal about the ability of supervision for any ouƟngs at all Please consider another locaƟon.

Isabelle Carroll
Sent from my iPhone
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1669 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 268
Mitchell Kois
From: Mette Vandborg <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 7:34 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: RE: Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Shelters for the Severely Mentally Ill at 413/825 Ocean Ave

EXTERNAL
10/13/2025
The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
RE: Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Shelters for the Severely Mentally Ill at 413/825 Ocean Ave
Dear Mayor Negrete, City Manager Chi, and Honorable Members of the City Council, I want to express my strong opposition to the process in which approvals and funding were secured for two mental health facilities which require no background checks or sobriety requirements, per a statement made by the LA County Department of Mental Health during a community town hall conducted on Thursday, October 9th. As such, I also write to express my strong support for Mayor Lana Negrete’s leadership and her recent memo requesting transparency, community engagement, and accountability regarding the facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue.

On a personal note. We are one of the many unfortunate families who lost our home due to the Palisades Fire. We moved to Marguerita Ave in Santa Monica. The building we now live in is less than ½ block away from the property on 413 Ocean Ave. A week ago today, my husband was assaulted by a mentally unstable man with an iron rod, and ended up in the hospital with fractures, lacerations etc. Now you want to jam an obviously incompatible use with 49 residents exhibiting all the characteristics that make the City unsafe, bad for trade, bad for families and bad for property values, and insert it into one of the last relatively safe pockets of public space, the North end of Palisades Park. I urge you to put an immediate stop to this.

The areas near Palisades Park are not only home to schools, senior living facilities, small businesses, and residents but also significantly support Santa Monica’s tourism economy, generating millions in annual tax revenue that support essential city services. Our city is already under significant financial stress, and we must Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1670 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 269
ensure that every funding decision protects both our most vulnerable residents and our broader economic health.

We must follow the transparency, community-centric measures outlined in the City of Santa Monica’s Homelessness Strategic Plan, where one of the first stated values of the plan is to be transparent. To expand, the documents states the goal of the effort is to be: “Transparent… We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community.” The mission statement of the strategic plan also claims to “promote the wellbeing of all”, but that clearly was not followed in the case of 413/825 Ocean Avenue.

Thank you for your service to our city and for considering this important item.

Sincerely,
Mette Vandborg
130 Marguerita Ave, Santa Monica, CA 90402
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1671 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 270
Mitchell Kois
From: Richard Thaler <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 7:09 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16B

EXTERNAL
We support item 16B in the city council agenda and oppose the proposed homeless mental health facility on Ocean Ave.

We are seniors who have made Santa Monica our home for the past 47 years. We walk the Palisades Park daily. Placing 49 severely mentally ill people, some of whom will be violent, in the middle of a residenƟal area and across from a beloved community park is cruel and irresponsible towards the residents of our city. Yes, the facility will have 24hr security- but who will secure the safety and well being of us residents when the mental paƟents are free to come and go?
We support giving treatment to ill people- but not at the expense of the health, safety, and well being of the community.

Richard and Agnes Thaler
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1672 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 271
Mitchell Kois
From: Una Au <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 6:55 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16B Support for Negrete

EXTERNAL
Dear Coucilmembers,
I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

The first public discussion on this topic took place Thursday, October 9th during a NOMA informational zoom meeting. However, it was clear the intention of St. Joseph’s and LA County was to open the facility illegally and without notice or community input. More so, fully formed operational polices or adequate safety measures to protect the surrounding neighborhood were not and have not been presented or accepted.

Furthermore, I am concerned to have learned from St. Joseph’s that individuals in this shelter will not be subject to drug testing or complete background checks, yet they will be permitted to exit and and enter the facility and community freely during the day. This poses significant risks to our community, especially given the proximity of schools, community parks and local residents. Additionally, it was suggested that others looking for homeless services would benefit from outreach being conducted in the surrounding area, effectively putting more homeless, mentally ill and drug addicts in the neighborhood. You are not simply housing 49 people you are a beacon to everyone looking for homeless services.

Personally, I would like to highlight that the elementary school my children attend, Carlthorp School, is located just 0.3 miles from the planned shelter location. In addition to Carlthorp, multiple other preschools and elementary schools in close proximity, educating thousands of elementary-aged students. The potential impact on the safety and well-being of these children and staff members cannot be overstated. It is illegal for anyone on the sex registry to live within a mile of a school and your suggested background check process is not measurable or complete.

It is clear your security plan beyond the shelter is not complete or adequate. The reputation of your Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1673 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 272
owner and “partner” in this facility was highlighted in this LA Times article from last year and details serious safety concerns surrounding another one his projects: https://www.latimes.com/homelesshousing/story/2024-11-05/new-owner-cuts-security-janitors-at-skid-row-homeless-housing-as-tenantsfear-worsening-conditions Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who attend the impacted schools.

Protect our children, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Una Au
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1674 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 273
Mitchell Kois
From: frankie stabler-sholem <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 6:42 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16-Negrete

EXTERNAL
As the owner of 141 Georgina Ave I am begging you to reconsider the placing of a homeless shelter on my corner.

I have already had incidents of vagrants and a mentally ill older man unlawfully entering my property and refusing to leave.

I am not willing to risk the safety of my family by having this facility on my corner.

I feel unsafe when I walk on 2nd Street to see my doctor once a week as I have been accosted every single time by unhoused delusional people, some very aggressive.

We must return Santa Monica to a safe environment for our senior citizens and our children.

Thank you
Frankie Sholem
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1675 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 274
Mitchell Kois
From: Coleman, Anne L. <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 6:37 AM
To: Lana Negrete
Cc: councilmtgitems; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis; Natalya Zernitskaya; Oliver Chi; Jesse Zwick
Subject: OceanAve mental health facility

EXTERNAL

Recently, I was made aware that the LA County Department of Mental Health (DMH), in partnership with St. Joseph Center, intends to establish two Behavioral Health Bridge Housing facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue in Santa Monica. The two properties will collectively serve to facilitate 49 interim housing beds for homeless individuals with severe behavioral health needs. St. Joseph Center will lease and operate the sites, while DMH will fund the services and program oversight through State Behavioral Health Bridge Housing resources.

I want to be clear that I support the intent of establishing these types of facilities, as they are needed pieces of infrastructure to bolster our homelessness response efforts. Further, LA County and St. Joseph Center have indicated that Santa Monica residents will be prioritized for placement, and that the facilities will include 24/7 staffing, on-site clinicians, and security personnel.

With that being said, the community has raised questions regarding possible impacts from this project. I am frustrated over the lack of prior notice or opportunity for public input before funding was approved by LA County and site renovations began.

Given the sensitivity of this matter and the community concerns expressed, I am requesting the following:

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1676 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 275

1. With respect to outreach related to the facilities on Ocean Avenue, direct that the City Manager coordinate with LA County, St. Joseph Center, and the project developer to ensure broad communication and outreach to both residents and adjacent businesses, including the Oceana (located two doors down from 825 Ocean Avenue) and other nearby stakeholders.

2. Direct that the City Manager work with the County of Los Angeles, relevant nonprofit partners, and project developers to ensure that all proposed supportive, shelter, or transitional housing projects within the City of Santa Monica comply with the intent and requirements of Proposition 1 and the Good Neighbor Policy (SB 326), including the community engagement provision set forth in Welfare and Institutions Code § 5604.2(a)(4), which requires citizen and professional involvement at all stages of the planning process – specifically including community members, business owners, housing, law enforcement, education, and others who interact with individuals living with mental illness on a daily basis.

3. Direct that the City Manager clarify zoning classifications,use types, and building-code provisions applicable to each supportive-service, shelter, and transitional housing type use, including whether such uses are permitted, conditionally permitted, or require discretionary review, and to return with recommendations that ensure that appropriate public notification always occurs to a neighborhood when such a project is being officially proposed.

4. Direct that the City Manager clearly define for the public the land use regulations that allow the facilities on Ocean to operate without needing to obtain a discretionary City permit. Along those lines, this work effort should include identification of what constitutes a mental-health facility, a transitional housing facility, an emergency shelter, and a supportive housing facility, and those details should be developed into a citywide communication strategy to inform the public about details related to these types of operations. That communications strategy should include: (1) an accessible webpage containing a comprehensive project FAQ detailing purpose, population Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1677 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 276
served, staffing, hours of operation, and oversight; (2) a designated hotline or contact person for residents and businesses to report nuisances or concerns; and (3) clear response protocols and follow-up mechanisms.

5. Direct that staff attempt to obtain from LA County verification with respect to the Ocean facility developer’s goals, operational record, and legal standing, in addition to how much LA County is paying the developer, and confirming that any developer or property owner involved in these projects is in good standing and not engaged in active litigation with the City or related public entities.

6. Please place this item on the October 14 agenda for full City Council consideration.

7. Finally, direct that the City Manager conduct a retrospective review of similar existing or recently approved projects – including those located in Sunset Park and the Pico Neighborhood – to determine whether proper community engagement and communication occurred, and, where lacking, to implement corrective measures and ensure that appropriate neighborhood contact and support systems are now in place.

Thank you for realizing the impact that your decisions have on our community. We are fortunate to have Oliver Chi as our new city manager. Let’s put him and yourselves to work and be the leaders that we are born to be!
I have been a Santa Monica homeowner for 30 years.

Best regards,
Anne
Anne L Coleman, MD, PhD
Chair, Department of Ophthalmology
Director of JSEI
Affiliation Chair of DEI
Bradley R Straatsma Endowed chair
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1678 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 277
UCLA HEALTH SCIENCES IMPORTANT WARNING: This email (and any attachments) is only intended for the use of the person or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. You, the recipient, are obligated to maintain it in a safe, secure and confidential manner. Unauthorized redisclosure or failure to maintain confidentiality may subject you to federal and state penalties. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately notify us by return email, and delete this message from your computer.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1679 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 278
Mitchell Kois
From: Mujon Baghai <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 2:11 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; [email protected] Subject: Item 16B Support for Negrete

EXTERNAL
The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401

[Sent via
email: [email protected]; [email protected]; lana.negrete @santamonica.gov; [email protected]; [email protected]; Da [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Na [email protected]; [email protected]] RE:Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Facilities for the Unhoused with Severe Mental Crises at 413/825 Ocean Ave

Dear Mayor Negrete, Honorable Members of the City Council, and City Manager Chi, I am writing to express my sincerest support for Mayor Negrete who has singlehandedly brought to light the non-transparent nature in which two facilities for the severely mentally ill were approved near schools, senior centers, and parks without any publicly available impact analyses, stakeholder notification, or community input per Welfare & Institutions Code §5604.2(a)(4)). I stand with my fellow Santa Monicans to request a suspension of the facilities at 413 Ocean Ave and 825 Ocean Ave until all six elements in Mayor Negrete’s memo are complete and publicly posted, particularly Item #6, which asks for a citywide comprehensive and transparent site review process for such facilities.

The issue is not about opposing care—it is about ensuring that care is delivered responsibly, safely, cost effectively, and with dignity for all. The Mayor’s call for coordination between the City, Los Angeles County, and nonprofit providers ensures that these projects will be guided by expertise, empathy, and accountability. The community should be viewed as Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1680 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 279
partners in this endeavor, to help all parties achieve the outcomes that benefit the wellbeing of all, which is one of the stated mission in the City’s Homelessness Strategic Plan.

Sincerely,
Mujon Baghai
535 Ocean Avenue 9D
Santa Monica, CA 90402
cc:Third District Los Angeles County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1681 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 280
Mitchell Kois
From: Melanie Wise <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 12:24 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Agenda Item 16B

EXTERNAL
Sunday Oct. 12, 2025
Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
[Sent via email: [email protected]; [email protected]] RE: Agenda Item 16 Commentary Request to DENY (minimally delay until proper public discourse is conducted) Opening of Shelters for the Severely Mentally Ill at 413/825 Ocean Ave Mayor Negrete, City Manager Chi, and Members of the City Council, I write to express my strong opposition to the above mentioned facilities.

The process in which approvals and funding were secured for two mental health facilities that completely preempted the city of Santa Monica’s leadership leaves one thinking: which of our city’s leaders are actually paying attention to what is occurring WITHIN OUR CITY? As a Santa Monican, I can NOT do squat on any piece of land within the limits of the city without a permit. HOW did these facilities get renovated WITHOUT THE EXPRESS KNOWLEDGE OF OUR CITY LEADERS? If these facilities are catching the council flat footed, it’s fair to say that ZERO due diligence has been performed.

How is it The People of Santa Monica are to be at the whim of Los Angeles county in order to foist upon our city severely mentally ill people requiring no background checks or sobriety requirements (per a statement made by the LA County Department of Mental Health during a community town hall conducted on Thursday, October 9th). While VERY LATE, I do appreciate Mayor Negrete’s recent memo requesting transparency, community engagement, and accountability regarding the facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1682 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 281
Common sense dictates that projects supporting severely mentally ill people having rights to come and go as they choose SHOULD NOT BE anywhere near senior facilities, preschools, elementary schools, small businesses, residents, tourists, hotels, parks, Santa Monica’s chief economy of tourism (generating millions in tax revenue supporting our essential services), — all within a half-mile radius.

The idea that installation of such a facility, risking GREAT potential WITHOUT full public input, clear information, thoughtful consideration of available citywide resources (e.g., law enforcement, fire and rescue services, etc.), neighborhood safety, tourism,and existing financial stresses perplexes the mind. City leadership should have grave concerns over negligence lawsuits generated should this installation actually occur. Without the rigor of full impact/environmental study of the potential fallout, our city and Los Angeles County may have even graver legal concerns. And rightfully, injured parties may also consider pursuing legal endeavors that entertain personal capacity. On the very good chance that Santa Monica law is being pre-empted, legal matters will ensue.

Negrete’s call for transparency, zoning clarity, and proper community engagement is the only proper path forward. Our fair city is organized by Charter giving a weighted voice to The People of Santa Monica. The entire Council should support efforts to bring accountability and balance to this incoming disaster – and minimally pause the opening of these facilities until all due diligence has been conducted, public hearings have been held, AND the public’s desires influence the final outcome. I’d bet big money, after transparency, the ability to install such facilities will evaporate like dew in the sun.

The community-centric measures outlined in the City of Santa Monica’s Homelessness Strategic Plan calls for transparency stating the effort to be: “Transparent… We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community.” We can clearly observe failure on this point. The mission statement goes further to “promote the wellbeing of all”. And here’s the second noted failure as regards 413/825 Ocean Avenue. THE ONLY WAY this Homelessness Strategic Plan "serves the well being of all" will be TO NOT INSTALL the facility in the presently proposed locations.

And finally, it is clear the City of Santa Monica is hostage to ‘managed decline’. Since 2016, the face of the entire city has changed. This is by purposeful design to birth a 15 minute city, despite many declarations of ignorance while failing to serve The People of Santa Monica. At this point, the actions and words rarely collide making the less than transparent city plan cast a mighty shadow (meaning, average people can see through the nonsense). Conduct yourselves accordingly. And Ms. Negrete, you may have throne chasers after your seat.

Best,
Melanie Wise
Santa Monican
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1683 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 282
Mitchell Kois
From: Claudia Matles <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 11:18 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16 Negrete

EXTERNAL
Sent from my iPhone
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1684 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 283
Mitchell Kois
From: Jennifer Broder <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 10:42 PM
To: Council Mailbox
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Delay Opening of Proposed Mental Health Facilities with Voluntary Entry/Exit Procedures at 413/825 Ocean Ave Per Item 16-B

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete, City Manager Chi, and Honorable Members of the City Council, I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

The first public discussion on this topic took place Thursday, October 9th during a NOMA informational zoom meeting. However, it was clear the intention of St. Joseph’s and LA County was to open the facility illegally and without notice or community input. More so, fully formed operational polices or adequate safety measures to protect the surrounding neighborhood were not and have not been presented or accepted.

Furthermore, I am concerned to have learned from St. Joseph’s that individuals in this shelter will not be subject to drug testing or complete background checks, yet they will be permitted to exit and and enter the facility and community freely during the day. This poses significant risks to our community, especially given the proximity of schools, community parks and local residents. Additionally, it was suggested that others looking for homeless services would benefit from outreach being conducted in the surrounding area, effectively putting more homeless, mentally ill and drug addicts in the neighborhood. You are not simply housing 49 people you are a beacon to everyone looking for homeless services.

There are multiple preschools and elementary schools in close proximity, educating thousands of elementary-aged students. The potential impact on the safety and well-being of these children and staff members cannot be overstated. It is illegal for anyone on the sex registry to live within a mile of a school and yet you will be placing nearly 50 seriously mentally ill individuals less than 1/3 of a mile from these schools and your suggested background check process is not measurable or complete.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1685 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 284
It is clear your security plan beyond the shelter is inadequate. The reputation of your owner and “partner” in this facility was highlighted in this LA Times article from last year and details serious safety concerns surrounding another one his projects:
https://www.latimes.com/homeless-housing/story/2024-11-05/new-owner-cuts-security-janitors-atskid-row-homeless-housing-as-tenants-fear-worsening-conditions Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who attend the impacted schools.

Protect our children, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Jennifer
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1686 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 285
Mitchell Kois
From: Laura LIM <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 10:41 PM
To: Lana Negrete; councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16 - Mtg Oct 14

EXTERNAL
I am vehemently opposed to the mental health facility planned on Ocean Avenue. This is one of the worst ideas Santa Monica has ever had. An unsecured insane asylum walking distance to schools and the public at large. If you think tourism is down now, what do you think will happen when word gets out that the beach front strip of mulƟmillion dollar condos and 5 star restaurants is also home to a mental insƟtuƟon. Unbelievable.

Sincerely,
LL
Santa Monica resident and home owner
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1687 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 286
Mitchell Kois
From: Jeanne Bernstein <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 10:37 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Stop

EXTERNAL
Please do not add any sick, homeless, drug taking people to our residences or parks Jeanne Bernstein Ocean Avenue Santa Monica Sent from my iPhone
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1688 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 287
Mitchell Kois
From: Vanessa Vlcek <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 10:35 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Council Mailbox
Subject: Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Shelters for the Severely Mentally Ill at 413/825 Ocean Ave

EXTERNAL
10/12/25
The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1689 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 288
decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community.” The mission statement of the strategic plan also claims to “promote the wellbeing of all”, but that clearly was not followed in the case of 413/825 Ocean Avenue.

Thank you for your service to our city and for considering this important item.

Sincerely,
Vanessa Vlcek
San Vicente/Ocean Resident
Sent from my iPhone
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1690 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 289
Mitchell Kois
From: Alan Leavitt <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 10:33 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Item 16 - Negrete

EXTERNAL
To whom it may concern: (everyone in Santa Monica)
>
> These faciliƟes that are planned for prime real estate and family areas in Santa Monica are dangerous and unregulated spaces that are going to bring harm to our community.
>
> It’s quite unfortunate that this was done the way it was, and the risks it brings to the community far outweigh the benefits it will bring.
>
> Please slow this process down for the proper input from the community and evaluaƟon for beƩer opƟons as this community already has enough issues it needs to deal with. >
> I support mental health treatment but would implore you to do it with proper services and oversight and community input and involvement. Done safely, ethically and transparently. >
> Thank you,
> Alan LeaviƩ
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1691 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 290
Mitchell Kois
From: Lacey Rose <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 10:27 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16B Support for Negrete

EXTERNAL
Dear Council members,
I am submitting my objection to the homeless shelter slated to open at 413 ocean avenue for the severely mentally ill.

I have two daughters who attend school a thousand feet from the facility -- one of several schools (and preschools) in close walking distance. My mother, an elderly widow, lives even closer.

As a concerned parent, daughter and a constituent, we urge you to support item 16B, and our Due Process rights under SB326.

Sincerely,
Lacey Rose
The Hollywood Reporter
Writer-At-Large
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1692 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 291
Mitchell Kois
From: Alena <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 10:10 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Suspend Approval and Funding of Facilities 413 & 825 Ocean Ave in Santa Monica, CA Due to Noncompliance with State Law and City Plans

EXTERNAL
Dear Supervisor Horvath,
I am writing to express my deep concern and disappointment over the manner in which your office and the Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health advanced funding and approvals for the voluntary entry/exit facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue for the unhoused and severely mentally ill without prior public notice or community engagement.

As City of Santa Monica Mayor Lana Negrete made clear in her October 9, 2025 memo to the Santa Monica City Manager, even the City of Santa Monica was “recently made aware” of the County’s actions after funding had been approved and renovations were already underway.

Residents were blindsided, left to discover this project through rumor rather than proper notification. This was not a clerical error—it was a profound failure of transparency.

The Mayor’s memo further highlights that the County and its nonprofit partners neglected to comply with Welfare and Institutions Code §5604.2(a)(4), which explicitly requires citizen and professional involvement at all stages of the planning process. That includes residents, local businesses, schools, and those directly impacted by such facilities. None of these stakeholders were given that opportunity.

Instead, this project was quietly advanced without consideration of the preschools, elementary schools, senior living facilities, and impacts on the city’s tourism hub that generates millions in revenue for a city already under fiscal strain. The secrecy surrounding this process has eroded public trust and undermined the very principles of open governance you have publicly championed.

While your office and St. Joseph Center’s newly released FAQ attempts to assure the public that the site will provide “24/7 staffing” and “enhanced security,” it is evident there is no coordinated plan to provide safety beyond the walls of these facilities, as discussed at the October 9th Town Hall, where your office, the LA County DMH, and St. Joseph’s presented. Transparency after the fact is not transparency—it’s damage control.

In addition, on page 5 of the City of Santa Monica’s Homelessness Strategic Plan one of the first stated values of the plan is to be transparent. I quote: “Transparent. We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community.” The mission statement of the strategic plan also claims to “promote the wellbeing of all”, but that clearly was not followed as we have outlined.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1693 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 292
Supervisor Horvath, the people of Santa Monica are not opposed to providing mental health care or supportive housing. We are opposed to being cut out of decisions that so profoundly affect our children, elderly, neighborhoods, schools, small businesses, safety, and economic stability.

You owe this community an explanation and must put a pause to the opening of these facilities until proper due diligence is completed in a public forum that is in compliance withthe law.

We urge you to pause the opening of the mental health facilities at 413 Ocean Avenue and 825 Ocean Avenue, and launch an investigation into the approach that was taken to approve these facilities, vendors, and sites until a full review is conducted with full transparency and meaningful public engagement.

Sincerely,
Alena Hwang
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1694 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 293
Mitchell Kois
From: Rebecca Lee <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 10:10 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: RE: Item 16B Support for Negrete

EXTERNAL
Dear Coucil members,
I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

Furthermore, I am concerned to have learned from St. Joseph’s that individuals in this shelter will not be subject to drug testing or complete background checks, yet they will be permitted to exit and and enter the facility and community freely during the day. This poses significant risks to our community, especially given the proximity of schools, community parks and local residents. Additionally, it was suggested that others looking for homeless services would benefit from outreach being conducted in the surrounding area, effectively putting more homeless, mentally ill and drug addicts in the neighborhood. You are not simply housing 49 people you are a beacon to everyone looking for homeless services.

It is clear your security plan beyond the shelter is not complete or adequate. The reputation of your Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1695 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 294
owner and “partner” in this facility was highlighted in this LA Times article from last year and details serious safety concerns surrounding another one his projects: https://www.latimes.com/homelesshousing/story/2024-11-05/new-owner-cuts-security-janitors-at-skid-row-homeless-housing-as-tenantsfear-worsening-conditions Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who attend the impacted schools.

Protect our children, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Rebecca Lee
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1696 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 295
Mitchell Kois
From: Kaity LeMay <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 9:53 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; [email protected] Subject: RE: Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Facilities for the Unhoused with Severe Mental Crises at 413/825 Ocean Ave

EXTERNAL
October 12, 2025
The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
[Sent via email: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]]
RE: Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Facilities for the Unhoused with Severe Mental Crises at 413/825 Ocean Ave
Dear Mayor Negrete, Honorable Members of the City Council, and City Manager Chi, I am writing to express my sincerest support for Mayor Negrete who has singlehandedly brought to light the nontransparent nature in which two facilities for the severely mentally ill were approved near schools, senior centers, and parks without any publicly available impact analyses, stakeholder notification, or community input per Welfare & Institutions Code §5604.2(a)(4)). I stand with my fellow Santa Monicans to request a suspension of the facilities at 413 Ocean Ave and 825 Ocean Ave until all six elements in Mayor Negrete’s memo are complete and publicly posted, particularly Item #6, which asks for a citywide comprehensive and transparent site review process for such facilities.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1697 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 296
Her leadership reminds us that compassion and accountability are not opposing values—they are inseparable. A community that truly cares about its most vulnerable must also care deeply about how decisions are made, how funds are spent, and how every stakeholder is treated.

Sincerely,
Kaity LeMay
Resident of Brentwood, Los Angeles & Parent at Carlthorp School, Santa Monica cc: Third District Los Angeles County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1698 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 297
Mitchell Kois
From: Lisa Ling <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 9:53 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Facilities for the Unhoused with Severe Mental Crises at 413/825 Ocean Ave

EXTERNAL
The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
Dear Mayor Negrete, Honorable Members of the City Council, and City Manager Chi, I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

As a homeowner in Santa Monica for over 15 years, I am outraged to have learned of the designation of 413 and 825 Ocean Ave. as “acute mental health facilities,” just LAST week and their planned opening THIS month. There are more than a thousand elementary school children who attend schools within walking distance to the facilities. Neither Roosevelt, Carlthorp or Canyon Schools have parking for parents, therefore children under 12 are walking everyday to get to schools.

To be springing this on a community without any prior public notice or engagement about safety protocols is utterly reprehensible. The lack of transparency is why people have totally lost faith in government, especially when it obvious that someone is profiting handsomely for this total disregard for the community.

Those suffering from mental illness deserve proper support that includes resources, drug treatment, programming—none of which can be easily accessed in a community where there is nothing around but schools and parks where children and elderly roam.

Members of this council have been aware of this project and neglected to share with the community— including the police department, how to ensure safety when no criminal background checks are required, no drug testing and an open door policy.

If residents can stay 90 days, we are talking about potentially hundreds of very sick people cycling through these facilities —only 15 of whom are required to be from Santa Monica. With no resources in the immediate area, what are people going to do?
WHO WILL LIABLE WHEN THERE IS AN INCIDENT?
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1699 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 298
Santa Monica deserves better than silence and secrecy. We deserve accountability. WE DESERVE DUE PROCESS!
Lisa Ling
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1700 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 299
Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 9:49 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: mentlhealth

EXTERNAL
not at this locaƟon, more suited in Victorvile or Lancaster,Riversie.

M Lachman 117 Fraser Santa Monica
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1701 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 300
Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 9:47 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: mental health on ocean ave

EXTERNAL
NIMBY on this locaƟon- Victorvile or Lancaster more suited for it.

Mitchell lachamn
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1702 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 301
Mitchell Kois
From: Cassandra Bujarski <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 9:33 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Council Mailbox; Lana Negrete; councilmtgitems; Dan Hall; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Jesse Zwick; [email protected]; Natalya Zernitskaya; [email protected]
Subject: Re: 413 Ocean Ave. and 825 Ocean Ave--Request For Action at This Week's Council Meeting

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and Honorable Members of the City Council:

As a resident of Santa Monica, I am wriƟng to express my dismay at the non-transparent nature in which two faciliƟes for severely mentally ill homeless individuals were approved near schools, senior centers, and parks without any publicly available impact analyses, stakeholder noƟficaƟon, or community input per Welfare & InsƟtuƟons Code §5604.2(a)(4)).

I stand with many fellow Santa Monicans to request a suspension of the faciliƟes at 413 Ocean Ave and 825 Ocean Ave the ("Ocean Projects") unƟl all six elements in Mayor Negrete’s memo of October 9 (Item 16B on this week's Council agenda) are complete and publicly posted, parƟcularly item #6 therein, which asks for a citywide comprehensive and transparent site review process for such faciliƟes.

While Mayor Nagrete's Item 16B appears to be focused on future faciliƟes and prospecƟve communicaƟon on the Ocean Projects, I request that these items apply retroacƟvely to the Ocean Projects, which should be subjected to the same benefit of transparency as promised on page 5 of the City of Santa Monica's Homelessness Strategic Plan: "We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intenƟons, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community." That trust has been seriously compromised.

These provisions are designed to guarantee that the voices of those with lived experience of mental illness, along with tenants, homeowners, local businesses, and first responders, are all heard, respected, and accounted for – parƟcularly as our city faces significant financial shorƞalls.

Calling for clarity on permiƫng, zoning, environmental consideraƟons, public safety consideraƟons, transparency in developer pracƟces, and robust public outreach is not a barrier to progress, but rather a way to foster the trust of our community. Let's match compassion with competence, strengthening our collecƟve ability to help people heal, stabilize, and reintegrate the ill into the community. A community that truly cares about its most vulnerable must also care deeply about how decisions are made, how funds are spent, and how every stakeholder is treated Los Angeles County should not be driving decisions that impact all of our communiƟes without accountability, and thus, we simultaneously call on Third District LA County Supervisor Lindsay Horvath to intervene, to both pause funding for these projects and support Mayor Negrete’s detailed request--as applied to the Ocean Projects.

In conclusion, we respecƞully request your support for all six requests in Mayor Negrete’s memo and pause the opening of the faciliƟes at 413 Ocean and 825 Ocean unƟl all the perƟnent disclosures and analyses are posted and shared with the public. Thank you for your service to our city and for considering this important item.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1703 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 302
Sincerely,
Cassandra Bujarski
212 20th Street
Santa Monica, CA 90402
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1704 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 303
Mitchell Kois
From: Freida Dubin <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 9:32 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue

EXTERNAL
I oppose the homeless mental health facilities planned for 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue.

As a Santa Monica resident for over 40 years who lives a few blocks from these facilities, it is unwise to have these facilities across the street from the park where there are many people, including families with children. Many times, I have seen homeless and/or mentally ill people screaming, annoying, and threatening people in the park, littering, and destroying park property with no accountability. There is a real likelihood that they will wind up supervised or unsupervised in the park and cause fear and harm to residents. There is also the likelihood that other homeless mentally ill people will congregate around those facilities and across the street at the park.

When I first moved here, I felt very safe going to the park. That is no longer true. I no longer use the restrooms as there are no dedicated women's facilities and with homeless men near the restrooms, I do not feel safe. As you were elected to represent Santa Monica residents, you need to consider their concerns.

Freida Dubin
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1705 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 304
Mitchell Kois
From: Catherine Jayne <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 9:29 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Regarding supportive housing 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue

EXTERNAL
Oct. 12, 2025
The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
[Sent via email: [email protected]; [email protected]] RE: Lack of Public Transparency and Compliance with the City’s Homelessness Strategic Plan / Request to Delay Opening of Proposed Mental Health Facilities with Voluntary Entry/Exit Procedures at 413 & 825 Ocean Ave, Per Item 16-B Dear Mayor Negrete, City Manager Chi, and Honorable Members of the City Council, First off, I write to offer my heartfelt support and appreciation for Mayor Lana Negrete who has been a staunch supporter of every Santa Monican, as she seeks transparency for all our communities – both retrospectively and prospectively. In her memo associated with Item 16-B, she has constructively outlined a way forward for the entire city to engage on the important decisions surrounding the compassionate care of the city’s unhoused populations, and particularly those with severe mental health challenges.

In addition, I am writing as a Santa Monica resident to express my concerns about the secretive negotiations between unnamed City Council Members, the City’s Housing and Human Services Department (HHS), the County Department of Mental Health (DMH) to fund – with taxpayer money – a 49-bed facility for the unhoused and several mentally ill. This project, according to the CEO of St. Joseph’s Center, was brought forward to the County only once a private developer who is currently suing the City of Santa Monica, sought out the County and St. Joseph’s to offer up his sites at 413 Ocean Avenue and 825 Ocean Avenue. During a 10/9 Townhall organized by the North of Montana Association (NOMA), the LA County Department of Mental Health shared – for the first time with the community – that no background checks or sobriety requirements would be in place at these new facilities, and that those accepted at these facilities could voluntary enter and exit with no supervision plan beyond the facilities’ walls.

While residents of Santa Monica must notify their surrounding neighbors for a mere hedge modification or expansion of a school sports court, no courtesy was provided to the community on this project that has significant reverberations throughout the entire City. The secrecy in which this project was approved without any public notification and its citywide financial/staffing burden is grossly negligent.

As such, we want to record our opposition to this project and provide full support for Item 16-B on the October 14, 2025 City Council agenda, corresponding to Mayor Negrete’s October 9, 2025 excellent and fair memorandum titled “Request for City Council Direction on Community Engagement, Zoning Clarity, and Accountability for LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects.” This proposal offers a thoughtful and balanced framework that promotes compassion and transparency while ensuring accountability, public safety, and community trust for the entire population of Santa Monica. While this item is specific to one community currently, every single community in Santa Monica deserves notification and public input in any projects that affect their community, writ large. Sunset Park, Pico Blvd, and Palisades Park have shown that while it is these communities today, it can be any neighborhood tomorrow.

We request the City and County work together to request a delay of the project at 413/825 Ocean Ave. until all of the items in 16-B have been discussed in public hearings and a new analysis explaining the rationale behind this project, the alternative sites that were considered, and if the County made a decision that is in compliance with the needs defined by the City, its residents, and other stakeholders.

Specifically, as it relates to Item 16-B:

3. Clarification of Zoning and Public Notification Requirements Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1706 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 305
Direction #3 requests clarification of zoning classifications, use types, and public notice procedures for supportive, shelter, and transitional housing projects. Clear zoning definitions protect both residents and service providers by establishing predictable rules and preventing misunderstandings about what types of uses are permitted “by right.” Ensuring that every neighborhood receives formal notice when a project is proposed is an essential safeguard for democratic participation. Every Santa Monican deserves to understand what are allowable uses for the buildings in their communities, particularly around communities that serve children and seniors.

5. Verification of Developer Qualifications and Financial Transparency Direction #5’s call for verification of the developer’s goals, operational record, legal standing, and compensation from LA County is essential for accountability. Residents have a right to know who is behind these projects, how public funds are being used, and whether any conflicts of interest or active litigation exist. This transparency builds confidence in both the City’s and County’s stewardship of public resources, and that site selection is driven by thoughtful due diligence, published documentation, and needs analyses that demonstrate funding needs are matched to the highest and best use, instead of driven by calls from developers who are seeking subsidized operations while they seek entitlements.

In addition, on page 5 of the City of Santa Monica’s Homelessness Strategic Plan one of the first stated values of the plan is to be transparent. I quote: “Transparent. We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community.” The mission statement of the strategic plan also claims to “promote the wellbeing of all”, but that clearly was not followed in the case of 413/825 Ocean Avenue.

Thank you for your leadership in ensuring Santa Monica’s approach to mental health and homelessness remains both compassionate and responsible.

To that end, please work with our community and the County to pause the opening of the unlocked mental illness facilities at 413/825 Ocean Ave.

Sincerely,
Catherine Jayne
305 Georgina Ave.

Catherine Jayne, Ph.D.

Cal Real Estate License No: 01433947
310-738-5101
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1707 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 306
Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 9:26 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: 413 and 825 Ocean avenue
Attachments: City of SM - Item 16-B - Detailed Letter re Mayor's Memo.docx

EXTERNAL
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1708 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) October 12, 2025
The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
[Sent via email: [email protected]; [email protected]] RE: Request to Delay Opening of Proposed Mental Health Facilities with Voluntary Entry/Exit Procedures at 413/825 Ocean Ave Per Item 16-B Dear Mayor Negrete, City Manager Chi, and Honorable Members of the City Council, I am writing as a Santa Monica resident to express my concerns about the secretive negotiations between unnamed City Council Members, the City’s Housing and Human Services Department (HHS), the County Department of Mental Health (DMH) to fund – with taxpayer money – a 49-bed facility for the unhoused and several mentally ill. This project, according to the CEO of St. Joseph’s Center, was brought forward to the County only once a private developer who is currently suing the City of Santa Monica, sought out the County and St. Joseph’s to offer up his sites at 413 Ocean Avenue and 825 Ocean Avenue.

We request the City and County work together to request a delay of the project at 413/825 Ocean Ave. until all of the items in 16-B have been discussed in public hearings and a new analysis explaining the rationale behind this project, the alternative sites that were considered, and if the County made a decision that is in compliance with the needs defined by the City and its residents.

Specifically, as it relates to Item 16-B:

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1709 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects)

5. Verification of Developer Qualifications and Financial Transparency Direction #5’s call for verification of the developer’s goals, operational record, legal standing, and compensation from LA County is essential for accountability. Residents have a right to know who is behind these projects, how public funds are being used, and whether any conflicts of interest or active litigation exist. This transparency builds confidence in both the City’s and County’s stewardship of public resources, and that site selection is driven by thoughtful due diligence, published documentation, and needs analyses that demonstrate funding needs are matched to the highest and best use, instead of driven by calls from developers who are seeking subsidized operations while they seek entitlements.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1710 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects)

In addition, on page 5 of the City of Santa Monica’s Homelessness Strategic Plan one of the first stated values of the plan is to be transparent. I quote: “Transparent. We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community.” The mission statement of the strategic plan also claims to “promote the wellbeing of all”, but that clearly was not followed in the case of 413/825 Ocean Avenue.

Sincerely,
Norman Galper
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1711 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 307
Mitchell Kois
From: Jason Bergsman <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 9:20 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: 413 Ocean Ave. and 825 Ocean Ave--Request For Action at This Week's Council Meeting

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and Honorable Members of the City Council:

As a resident of Santa Monica, I am writing to express my dismay at the non-transparent nature in which two facilities for severely mentally ill homeless individuals were approved near schools, senior centers, and parks without any publicly available impact analyses, stakeholder notification, or community input per Welfare & Institutions Code §5604.2(a)(4)).

I stand with many fellow Santa Monicans to request a suspension of the facilities at 413 Ocean Ave and 825 Ocean Ave the ("Ocean Projects") until all six elements in Mayor Negrete’s memo of October 9 (Item 16B on this week's Council agenda) are complete and publicly posted, particularly item #6 therein, which asks for a citywide comprehensive and transparent site review process for such facilities.

While Mayor Nagrete's Item 16B appears to be focused on future facilities and prospective communication on the Ocean Projects, I request that these items apply retroactively to the Ocean Projects, which should be subjected to the same benefit of transparency as promised on page 5 of the City of Santa Monica's Homelessness Strategic Plan: "We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community." That trust has been seriously compromised.

The city should seek a fair process that "promotes the wellbeing of all", including residents, when expending taxpayer funds--whatever their source--to address homelessness, in compliance with state law and the spirit of our City’s Strategic Plan on Homelessness, which both require community and professional involvement at every stage. These provisions are designed to guarantee that the voices of those with lived experience of mental illness, along with tenants, homeowners, local businesses, and first responders, are all heard, respected, and accounted for – particularly as our city faces significant financial shortfalls.

Calling for clarity on permitting, zoning, environmental considerations, public safety considerations, transparency in developer practices, and robust public outreach is not a barrier to progress, but rather a way to foster the trust of our community. Let's match compassion with competence, strengthening our collective ability to help people heal, stabilize, and reintegrate the ill into the community. A community that truly cares about its most vulnerable must also care deeply about how decisions are made, how funds are spent, and how every stakeholder is treated
.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1712 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 308
Los Angeles County should not be driving decisions that impact all of our communities without accountability, and thus, we simultaneously call on Third District LA County Supervisor Lindsay Horvath to intervene, to both pause funding for these projects and support Mayor Negrete’s detailed request--as applied to the Ocean Projects.

In conclusion, we respectfully request your support for all six requests in Mayor Negrete’s memo and pause the opening of the facilities at 413 Ocean and 825 Ocean until all the pertinent disclosures and analyses are posted and shared with the public. Thank you for your service to our city and for considering this important item.

Sincerely,
Jason Bergsman
212 20th Street
Santa Monica, CA 90402
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1713 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 309
Mitchell Kois
From: Bahereh Enayati <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 9:17 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Council Mailbox
Subject: Proposal for metal facility

EXTERNAL
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed mental health facility on Ocean Avenue. I am a longtime resident of Santa Monica and have been a proud member of this community. Over the years, I have witnessed a heartbreaking decline in the safety, charm, and desirability of our once-great city — largely due to a series of ill-conceived decisions made by city and governmental agencies.

Placing a mental health institution on Ocean Avenue — one of the most iconic, valuable, and beautiful stretches of real estate in the entire country — is beyond belief. This decision defies logic, community values, and common sense. It demonstrates a complete disregard for residents, property owners, and families who have built their lives here.

As a resident I no longer feel safe walking the streets of Santa Monica. What used to be a peaceful and vibrant community has become a place where residents feel vulnerable and on edge. Children can no longer safely ride their bikes or walk to school without concern. This is not the Santa Monica I moved in nearly fave decades ago and were proud to call our home.

There are countless other locations far more suitable for such a facility — areas that would not compromise the safety, character, and economic vitality of our city’s most treasured neighborhood. Choosing Ocean Avenue, of all places, shows a deep misunderstanding of both the community’s needs and the long-term implications of this decision.

As a lifelong Santa Monica resident and property owner, I am appalled. I love this city deeply, but the continual erosion of its safety and reputation through reckless planning decisions is devastating. I urge you in the strongest possible terms to reconsider and reject this proposal.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1714 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 310
Respectfully,
Darioush Enayati
Santa Monica Native and Resident    
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1715 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 311
Mitchell Kois
From: Jennifer Leavitt <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 9:15 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Item 16 - Negrete

EXTERNAL
To whom it may concern: (everyone in Santa Monica)
These faciliƟes that are planned for prime real estate and family areas in Santa Monica are dangerous and unregulated spaces that are going to bring harm to our community.

It’s quite unfortunate that this was done the way it was, and the risks it brings to the community far outweigh the benefits it will bring.

Please slow this process down for the proper input from the community and evaluaƟon for beƩer opƟons as this community already has enough issues it needs to deal with.

I support mental health treatment but would implore you to do it with proper services and oversight and community input and involvement. Done safely, ethically and transparently.

Thank you,
Jenni LeaviƩ
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1716 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 312
Mitchell Kois
From: Jason Bergsman <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 9:13 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: 413 Ocean Ave. and 824 Ocean Ave--Request For Action at This Week's Council Meeting

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and Honorable Members of the City Council:

While Mayor Nagrete's Item 16B appears to be focused on future facilities and prospective communication on the Ocean Projects, I request that these items apply retroactively to the Ocean Projects, which should be subjected to the same benefit of transparency as promised on page 5 of the City of Santa Monica's Homelessness Strategic Plan--"We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community." That trust has been seriously compromised.

The city should seek a fair process that "promotes the wellbeing of all"--including (again quoted from the Strategic Plan) to expend taxpayer funds--whatever their source--in compliance with state law and the spirit of our City’s Strategic Plan on Homelessness, which require community and professional involvement at every stage. These provisions are designed to guarantee that the voices of those with lived experience of mental illness, along with tenants, homeowners, local businesses, and first responders, are all heard, respected, and accounted for – particularly as our city faces significant financial shortfalls.

Los Angeles County should not be driving decisions that impact all of our communities without accountability, and thus, we simultaneously call on Third District LA County Supervisor Lindsay Horvath Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1717 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 313
to intervene, to both pause funding for these projects and support Mayor Negrete’s detailed request--as applied to the Ocean Projects.

In conclusion, we respectfully request your support for all six requests in Mayor Negrete’s memo and pause the opening of the facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean until all the pertinent disclosures analyses are posted and shared with the public. Thank you for your service to our city and for considering this important item.

Sincerely,
Jason Bergsman
212 20th Street
Santa Monica, CA 90402
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1718 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 314
Mitchell Kois
From: Bahereh Enayati <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 9:13 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Protesting the proposed mental facility on Ocean Ave

As a female resident, I no longer feel safe walking the streets of Santa Monica. What used to be a peaceful and vibrant community has become a place where residents feel vulnerable and on edge. Children can no longer safely ride their bikes or walk to school without concern. This is not the Santa Monica I moved in nearly fave decades ago and were proud to call our home.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1719 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 315
Respectfully,
Bahereh Joy Enayati
Santa Monica Native and Resident
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1720 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 316
Mitchell Kois
From: Aleese Orr <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 9:06 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: Request to Delay Opening at 413/825 Ocean Ave Per Item 16-B

EXTERNAL
October 12, 2025
The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
[Sent via email: [email protected]; [email protected]] RE: Request to Delay Opening of Proposed Mental Health Facilities with Voluntary Entry/Exit Procedures at 413/825 Ocean Ave Per Item 16-B
Dear Mayor Negrete, City Manager Chi, and Honorable Members of the City Council, I am writing as a Santa Monica resident to express my concerns about the secretive negotiations between unnamed City Council Members, the City’s Housing and Human Services Department (HHS), the County Department of Mental Health (DMH) to fund – with taxpayer money – a 49-bed facility for the unhoused and several mentally ill. This project, according to the CEO of St. Joseph’s Center, was brought forward to the County only once a private developer who is currently suing the City of Santa Monica, sought out the County and St. Joseph’s to offer up his sites at 413 Ocean Avenue and 825 Ocean Avenue.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1721 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 317
We request the City and County work together to request a delay of the project at 413/825 Ocean Ave. until all of the items in 16-B have been discussed in public hearings and a new analysis explaining the rationale behind this project, the alternative sites that were considered, and if the County made a decision that is in compliance with the needs defined by the City and its residents.

Specifically, as it relates to Item 16-B:

1. Comprehensive Outreach and Communication
We strongly support Direction #1, which calls for coordination between the City, LA County Department of Mental Health (DMH), St. Joseph Center, and the project developer to ensure robust outreach to residents and nearby businesses— including the numerous schools, hotels, small businesses, and other stakeholders along Ocean Avenue and its surrounding radius. Residents and local business owners deserve timely notice and a chance to understand project goals, operations, and impacts. Transparent engagement fosters cooperation rather than conflict and ensures that city decisions reflect both compassion and local input.

Every Santa Monican deserves to understand what are allowable uses for the buildings in their communities, particularly around communities that serve children and seniors.

4. Public Explanation of Land Use and Operational Standards Direction #4 calls for a clear public explanation of the legal basis that allows these facilities to operate without a discretionary City permit. Residents must understand the distinctions between a mental health facility, a transitional housing facility, an emergency shelter, and supportive housing—and how each is governed under City and State law. The Mayor’s proposed public communications strategy—including a dedicated FAQ webpage, hotline for concerns, and clear follow-up protocols— is precisely the kind of accessible, fact-based communication the community needs. The fact that no one has yet been able to access any public documentation regarding the process and application in which these facilities were approved and funded with taxpayer funds speaks to the lack of transparency the law requires.

5. Verification of Developer Qualifications and Financial Transparency Direction #5’s call for verification of the developer’s goals, operational record, legal standing, and compensation from LA County is essential for accountability. Residents have a right to know who is behind these projects, how public funds are being used, and whether any conflicts of interest or active litigation exist. This transparency builds confidence in both the City’s and County’s stewardship of public resources, and that site selection is driven by thoughtful due diligence, published documentation, and needs analyses that demonstrate funding needs are matched to the highest and best use, instead of driven by calls from developers who are seeking subsidized operations while they seek entitlements.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1722 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 318
Conclusion
The Mayor’s memo provides a clear roadmap toward a balanced approach—one that supports mental health initiatives while demanding accountability, transparency, and respect for Santa Monica residents. I respectfully urge the City Council to adopt all six directives in full and to hold LA County and its nonprofit partners to the highest standards of openness, compliance, and community collaboration.

In addition, on page 5 of the City of Santa Monica’s Homelessness Strategic Plan one of the first stated values of the plan is to be transparent. I quote: “Transparent. We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community.” The mission statement of the strategic plan also claims to “promote the wellbeing of all”, but that clearly was not followed in the case of 413/825 Ocean Avenue.

Sincerely,
Aleese Orr
308 Alta Ave, Santa Monica
[email protected]
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1723 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 319
Mitchell Kois
From: Yury Kapgan <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 9:03 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Facilities

EXTERNAL
Oct. 12, 2025
The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401

RE: Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Facilities for the Unhoused with Severe Mental Crises at 413/825 Ocean Ave Dear Mayor Negrete, Honorable Members of the City Council, and City Manager Chi, I am writing to express my sincerest support for Mayor Negrete who has singlehandedly brought to light the non-transparent nature in which two facilities for the severely mentally ill were approved near schools, senior centers, and parks without any publicly available impact analyses, stakeholder notification, or community input per Welfare & Institutions Code §5604.2(a)(4)). I stand with my fellow Santa Monicans to request a suspension of the facilities at 413 Ocean Ave and 825 Ocean Ave until all six elements in Mayor Negrete’s memo are complete and publicly posted, particularly Item #6, which asks for a citywide comprehensive and transparent site review process for such facilities.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1724 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 320
By calling for clarity on zoning, transparency in developer practices, and robust public outreach, Mayor Negrete is not creating barriers to progress—she is building trust, ensuring that our city’s compassion is matched by competence in every single neighborhood across this city. This approach strengthens our collective ability to help people heal, stabilize, and reintegrate into the community.

Thank you for your service to our city and for considering this important item.

Sincerely,
Yury Kapgan
143 Foxtail Dr, Santa Monica, CA 90402
[email protected]
cc: Third District Los Angeles County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1725 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 321
Mitchell Kois
From: Laurie Rosenthal <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 8:56 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: Homeless Mental Health Facility on Ocean Avenue

EXTERNAL
Hello:

It is preposterous that the Ocean Avenue facility can open without the usual vetting that is required for all Santa Monica citizens/business owners/developers when we want to open a new business, build a new home, or even remodel an old home. The amount of procedures that must be followed is staggering.

Why is this project exempt from the law?
Please make this facility follow the rules and procedures just like everyone else.

Please do not approve this until more information is known.

Please support Item 16B.

Thank you,
Laurie Rosenthal
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1726 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 322
Mitchell Kois
From: Paul Song <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 8:54 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; [email protected]; [email protected]; Lana Negrete; Lisa Ling
Subject: RE: Item 16B Support for Negrete

EXTERNAL
Dear Santa Monica City Councilmembers,
I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

Before anyone brings up being a NIMBY, please know that my wife, Lisa Ling and I are extremely passionate and supportive of improving mental health services and the overall human condition. We experience unhoused mentally ill in Santa Monica on a daily basis.

Lisa has even done stories on one such individual who physically threatened to kill me in Santa Monica in the very same neighborhood where this is being opened. The individual had schizophrenia and was off all meds.
https://tv.apple.com/us/episode/las-mental-healthcrisis/umc.cmc.3uhik393y7c6iav3dakh5653z?showId=umc.cmc.4jcs236olhngke46lt58mj 5g
Ling devotes an hour to the mental illness crisis in Los Angeles and how it ties into the city’s homeless encampments. The episode opens with Ling’s first-hand experience:

Her husband and daughter were confronted and threatened by a homeless man in Santa Monica who was later arrested for burglary. Ling tracks down the man and interviews him after his incarceration.

We have learned from St. Joseph’s that individuals in this shelter will not be subject to drug testing or complete background checks, yet they will be permitted to exit and enter the facility and community freely during the day. Having experienced this violence first hand, I think it is very irresponsible and exposes our community to potential risks and unintended consequences, especially given the close proximity of schools, community parks, and local residents. We have also learned that St. Joseph's has no Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1727 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 323
prior experience with full-time live-in mental health centers and that their only mental health facilities are day only service centers, not homes.

Having already seen my oldest daughter traumatized by
such a violent encounter, I would like to highlight
that there are multiple other preschools and elementary schools in close proximity, educating thousands of
elementary-aged students.

It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of the Santa Monica community members first, especially the many children who attend the impacted schools. And it is clear that your security plan beyond the shelter is not complete or adequate.

And this plan only sets aside a small percentage of spots for Santa Monica mentally ill unhoused residents. Why
are you asking Santa Monica residents to bear the brunt to treat a majority non-Santa Monica population.

It is clear that the Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

The first public discussion on this topic took place Thursday, October 9th during a NOMA informational zoom
meeting. However, it was clear the intention of St. Joseph’s and LA County was to open the facility illegally and without notice, community input. More so, fully formed operational policies or adequate safety measures to protect the surrounding neighborhood were not and have not been presented or accepted.

St. Joseph’s also shared a timeline that implicated city staff and at least 3 Council Members, all who were informed of the project since February and provided no community outreach, further violating Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1728 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 324
our rights. This is over 6 months where we could have all tried to work together for a solution, but instead this was all done in secrecy and abruptly forced upon us.

Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location and keeping the affected community in the dark is wrong and unacceptable! Especially without community knowledge or input.

Protect our children, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Best,
Paul Song
234 Alta Avenue
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1729 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 325
Mitchell Kois
From: Brigette Lubin <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 8:52 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; [email protected] Cc: Aaron Lubin
Subject: Re: 413 Ocean Avenue - My in-laws live 4 doors down - this is unsafe for them

EXTERNAL
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 12, 2025, at 8:49 PM, Brigette Lubin <[email protected]> wrote:

Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 12, 2025, at 10:46 AM, Brigette Lubin
<[email protected]> wrote:

Dear Mayor Negrete, City Manager Chi, and Honorable Members of the City Council,
I am writing as a Santa Monica resident to express my concerns about the secretive negotiations between unnamed City Council Members, the City’s Housing and Human Services Department (HHS), the County Department of Mental Health (DMH) to fund – with taxpayer money – a 49-bed facility for the unhoused and several mentally ill. This project, according to the CEO of St. Joseph’s Center, was brought forward to the County only once a private developer who is currently suing the City of Santa Monica, sought out the County and St. Joseph’s to offer up his sites at 413 Ocean Avenue and 825 Ocean Avenue.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1730 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 326
As such, we want to record our opposition to this project and provide full support for Item 16-B on the October 14, 2025 City Council agenda, corresponding to Mayor Negrete’s October 9, 2025 excellent and fair memorandum titled “Request for City Council Direction on Community Engagement, Zoning Clarity, and Accountability for LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects.” This proposal offers a thoughtful and balanced framework that promotes compassion and transparency while ensuring accountability, public safety, and community trust for the entire population of Santa Monica. While this project is specific to the community near Palisades Park, every single community in Santa Monica deserves notification and public input in any projects that affect their community, writ large. While it is this community today, it can be any community tomorrow.

We request the City and County work together to request a delay of the project at 413/825 Ocean Ave. until all of the items in 16-B have been discussed in public hearings and a new analysis explaining the rationale behind this project, the alternative sites that were considered, and if the County made a decision that is in compliance with the needs defined by the City and its residents.

Specifically, as it relates to Item 16-B:

4. Public Explanation of Land Use and Operational Standards Direction #4 calls for a clear public explanation of the legal basis that allows these facilities to operate without a discretionary City permit. Residents must understand the distinctions between a mental health facility, a transitional housing facility, an emergency shelter, and supportive housing—and how each is governed under City and State law. The Mayor’s proposed public communications strategy—including a dedicated FAQ webpage, hotline for concerns, and clear follow-up protocols—is precisely the kind of accessible, fact-based communication the community needs. The fact that no one has yet been able to access Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1731 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 327
any public documentation regarding the process and application in which these facilities were approved and funded with taxpayer funds speaks to the lack of transparency the law requires.

5. Verification of Developer Qualifications and Financial Transparency Direction #5’s call for verification of the developer’s goals, operational record, legal standing, and compensation from LA County is essential for accountability. Residents have a right to know who is behind these projects, how public funds are being used, and whether any conflicts of interest or active litigation exist. This transparency builds confidence in both the City’s and County’s stewardship of public resources, and that site selection is driven by thoughtful due diligence, published documentation, and needs analyses that demonstrate funding needs are matched to the highest and best use, instead of driven by calls from developers who are seeking subsidized operations while they seek entitlements.

This proactive stance prevents repeated errors and strengthens long-term public trust.

Given the City’s financial challenges with cut services, particularly in public safety, we must provide support to all affected services across the City that no department is overly burdened by County-driven decisions that silence City taxpayers.

In addition, on page 5 of the City of Santa Monica’s Homelessness Strategic Plan one of the first stated values of the plan is to be transparent. I quote: “Transparent. We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community.” The mission statement of the strategic plan also claims to “promote the wellbeing of all”, but that clearly was not followed in the case of 413/825 Ocean Avenue.

Sincerely,
Brigette Lubin
653 Kingman Avenue
Santa Monica, CA
_____________________
Brigette Lubin
Ocean Showroom
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1732 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 328
Cooper Building
860 S Los Angeles St. #520
Los Angeles. CA 90014
c: 213.842.9684
[email protected]
ELAINE KIM * LUSANA * SOIA&KYO * Oliveve
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1733 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 329
Mitchell Kois
From: Scott Parish <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 8:52 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Council Mailbox
Cc: Helen Johns
Subject: Opposition to Ocean Avenue Mental Health Facility — Request for Full Environmental and Community Review

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and Members of the Santa Monica City Council, As a long term resident of Santa Monica and one with children a block from this facility, I am writing to formally oppose the proposed mental health facility on Ocean Avenue in its current form, based on procedural deficiencies, unaddressed environmental impacts, and inadequate community engagement, rather than any objection to mentalhealth services themselves.

Santa Monica has long supported inclusive and compassionate care, but this particular project raises serious concerns regarding process, location suitability, and public safety planning that warrant a full review before approval.

1. Inadequate Environmental and Impact Review (CEQA)
The project appears to have moved forward without a complete Environmental Impact Report (EIR). A facility of this intensity — involving 24-hour operations, emergency response coordination, and increased service calls — meets the threshold for review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Key unexamined impacts include:

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1734 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 330
 Traffic and parking load on Ocean Avenue, where existing congestion and limited curbside capacity already challenge residents and visitors.  Public safety impacts from increased emergency vehicle activity, which have not been modeled.
 Noise and light impacts from 24-hour operations in a mixed-use corridor adjacent to residential zones.

2. Procedural Irregularities and Lack of Notice
Several nearby residents report not receiving formal notice of the project’s hearings or approvals. City and county guidelines require notice to property owners and tenants within 500 feet of the site. If notice was missed, this constitutes a procedural defect that invalidates prior approvals until corrected.

3. Land-Use Compatibility and Zoning Concerns
The proposed use is inconsistent with the current zoning and area plan for this section of Ocean Avenue, which prioritizes coastal access, tourism, and compatible residential density.

The facility’s operational model—essentially a hybrid residential-institutional use— requires a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), and that CUP must demonstrate that the project will not adversely affect adjacent properties. No such finding appears in the public record.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1735 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 331

4. Public Safety and Service Burden
Data from comparable facilities in Los Angeles and Long Beach show an average increase of 25–40% in police, fire, and paramedic calls within a two-block radius during the first year of operation.

Given that Santa Monica’s emergency services are already operating above capacity, this project’s approval without a mitigation plan places both residents and clients at risk.

5. Alternative Sites and Collaborative Options
If the City and County are intent on adding a behavioral-health resource, it should be located where access to medical infrastructure, transit, and controlled campus-style environments already exists — for example, near the UCLA Santa Monica Medical Center corridor or underused public parcels zoned for institutional use.

Ocean Avenue lacks that infrastructure and will instead face operational strain.

6. Requested Actions
I respectfully request that the City Council:

1. Suspend project approvals pending a full CEQA Environmental Impact Report.

2. Require proper mailed notice and new public hearings for all affected residents and businesses.

3. Commission an independent public-safety and traffic impact study before granting any building permits.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1736 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 332

4. Engage a neighborhood working group to evaluate alternative locations or operational adjustments.

Conclusion
Santa Monica residents are not opposing mental-health care; we are asking for good planning, lawful procedure, and appropriate siting. The City has an obligation to ensure that projects of this scale meet objective environmental, safety, and procedural standards before proceeding.

Thank you for your consideration and for ensuring that development decisions are transparent, lawful, and consistent with the City’s General Plan and community values.

Scott Parish
415-818-2201
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1737 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 333
Mitchell Kois
From: Brigette Lubin <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 8:50 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Aaron Lubin
Subject: Re: 413 Ocean Avenue - My in-laws live 4 doors down - this is unsafe for them

EXTERNAL
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 12, 2025, at 10:46 AM, Brigette Lubin <[email protected]> wrote:

Dear Mayor Negrete, City Manager Chi, and Honorable Members of the City Council, I am writing as a Santa Monica resident to express my concerns about the secretive negotiations between unnamed City Council Members, the City’s Housing and Human Services Department (HHS), the County Department of Mental Health (DMH) to fund – with taxpayer money – a 49-bed facility for the unhoused and several mentally ill. This project, according to the CEO of St. Joseph’s Center, was brought forward to the County only once a private developer who is currently suing the City of Santa Monica, sought out the County and St. Joseph’s to offer up his sites at 413 Ocean Avenue and 825 Ocean Avenue.

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1738 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 334
explaining the rationale behind this project, the alternative sites that were considered, and if the County made a decision that is in compliance with the needs defined by the City and its residents.

Specifically, as it relates to Item 16-B:

Enforcing these mandates ensures that mental health projects are developed with appropriate compassion for affected communities with input from residents, law enforcement, educators, housing experts, business owners, and those with lived experience. This is fidelity to the law and the spirit of partnership that newly passed state requires.

5. Verification of Developer Qualifications and Financial Transparency Direction #5’s call for verification of the developer’s goals, operational record, legal standing, and compensation from LA County is essential for accountability. Residents have a right to know who is behind these projects, how public funds are being used, and whether any conflicts of interest or active litigation exist. This transparency builds confidence in both the City’s and County’s stewardship of public resources, and that site selection is driven by thoughtful due diligence, published documentation, and needs analyses that demonstrate funding needs are matched to the highest and best use, instead of driven by calls from developers who are seeking subsidized operations while they seek entitlements.

6. Retrospective Review and Corrective Action
Direction #6 ensures that the entire City of Santa Monica benefits from a thoughtful approach to compassionate care. We must learn from past experience by reviewing similar projects in Sunset Park and the Pico Neighborhood. If community engagement was inadequate in earlier projects, the City should take corrective steps now—establishing consistent contact systems, feedback channels, and neighborhood support mechanisms. This proactive stance prevents repeated errors and strengthens long-term public trust. Given the City’s financial challenges with cut services, particularly in public safety, we must provide Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1739 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 335
support to all affected services across the City that no department is overly burdened by County-driven decisions that silence City taxpayers.

In addition, on page 5 of the City of Santa Monica’s Homelessness Strategic Plan one of the first stated values of the plan is to be transparent. I quote: “Transparent. We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community.” The mission statement of the strategic plan also claims to “promote the wellbeing of all”, but that clearly was not followed in the case of 413/825 Ocean Avenue.

Sincerely,
Brigette Lubin
653 Kingman Avenue
Santa Monica, CA
_____________________
Brigette Lubin
Ocean Showroom
Cooper Building
860 S Los Angeles St. #520
Los Angeles. CA 90014
c: 213.842.9684
[email protected]
ELAINE KIM * LUSANA * SOIA&KYO * Oliveve
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1740 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 336
Mitchell Kois
From: John Rumer <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 8:50 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Council Mailbox
Subject: Item 16 - Negrete

EXTERNAL
I am writing to express my strong objection to the proposed transitional housing facility for homeless individuals with serious mental illness at 413 and 425 Ocean Avenue, as reported in The Lookout on October 6, 2025. While I support efforts to address homelessness and mental health, I am deeply concerned about the lack of transparency, community input, and oversight in this project’s planning and implementation.

Key issues include:
1 Lack of Community Notification: The City and residents were not informed until after funding was secured and permits were filed, undermining trust. This approach, as you noted, is “not how you build community trust.”
2 Public Safety Concerns: The open-door policy, allowing residents to leave the facility, raises risks in an already strained area with significant homelessness-related police calls (e.g., eight daily responses to nearby parks). The proposed 24/7security and curfew are insufficient without clear off-site supervision plans. 3 Inappropriate Location: These prime oceanfront properties, valued at millions, are in a residential and tourist-heavy zone near Palisades Park. Placing a high-acuity facility here could exacerbate local safety and quality-of-life issues.
4 Limited City Oversight: As a private project funded by the County and operated by St. Joseph Center, the City’s inability to alter or stop it—due to state mandates like Proposition 1—feels like a loss of local control.

I urge the City to:
• Advocate for relocating the facility to a less residential or tourist-centric area. • Demand enhanced safety measures, such as locked wings or mandatory off-site chaperones, to protect the community.
• Hold the Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health and St. Joseph Center accountable with transparent metrics on resident screening, incident reporting, and program outcomes. • Explore legal avenues, like appealing the Change of Use Permit, to ensure proper review.

I appreciate your efforts to organize a town hall and encourage robust community engagement to address these concerns. Please keep residents informed and consider our objections before the project moves forward.

Sincerely,
John Rumer
129 Alta Ave, Santa Monica, CA 90402
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1741 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 337
Mitchell Kois
From: John Skinner <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 8:44 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; [email protected]; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; [email protected]
Subject: Request to Delay Opening of Proposed Mental Health Facilities with Voluntary Entry/Exit Procedures at 417/825 Ocean Ave Per Item 16-B

We request the City and County work together to request a delay of the project at 413/825 Ocean Ave. until all of the items in 16-B have been discussed in public hearings and a new analysis explaining the rationale behind this project, the alternative sites that were Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1742 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 338
considered, and if the County made a decision that is in compliance with the needs defined by the City and its residents.

Specifically, as it relates to Item 16-B:

This is fidelity to the law and the spirit of partnership that newly passed state requires.

The Mayor’s proposed public communications strategy—including a dedicated FAQ webpage, hotline for concerns, and clear follow-up protocols—is precisely the kind of accessible, factbased communication the community needs. The fact that no one has yet been able to access any public documentation regarding the process and application in which these facilities were approved and funded with taxpayer funds speaks to the lack of transparency the law requires.

5. Verification of Developer Qualifications and Financial Transparency Direction #5’s call for verification of the developer’s goals, operational record, legal standing, and compensation from LA County is essential for accountability. Residents have a right to know who is behind these projects, how public funds are being used, and whether any conflicts of interest or active litigation exist. This transparency builds confidence in both the City’s and County’s stewardship of public resources, and that site selection is driven by thoughtful due diligence, published documentation, and needs analyses that demonstrate funding needs are Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1743 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 339
matched to the highest and best use, instead of driven by calls from developers who are seeking subsidized operations while they seek entitlements.

6. Retrospective Review and Corrective Action
Direction #6 ensures that the entire City of Santa Monica benefits from a thoughtful approach to compassionate care. We must learn from past experience by reviewing similar projects in Sunset Park and the Pico Neighborhood. If community engagement was inadequate in earlier projects, the City should take corrective steps now—establishing consistent contact systems, feedback channels, and neighborhood support mechanisms. This proactive stance prevents repeated errors and strengthens long-term public trust. Given the City’s financial challenges with cut services, particularly in public safety, we must provide support to all affected services across the City so that no department is overly burdened by County-driven decisions that silence City taxpayers.

Conclusion
It is extremely frustrating as a lifelong Santa Monica resident to feel like the safety and well-being of the city's tax paying residents are not a priority. I am SICK AND TIRED of always hearing about important issues at the last minute. Why is it that you as politicians campaign on transparency, and yet do things like this in such a stealth manner?
The location of these facilities are near elementary schools and park land areas that are used by a ton of local residents of all ages. It only takes one awful incident from a mentally unstable person to destroy the lives of many. We have personal friends who have been impacted by awful actions of people that truly need 24 hour care. Please stand up for your constituents!!
The Mayor’s memo provides a clear roadmap toward a balanced approach—one that supports mental health initiatives while demanding accountability, transparency, and respect for Santa Monica residents. I respectfully urge the City Council to adopt all six directives in full and to hold LA County and its nonprofit partners to the highest standards of openness, compliance, and community collaboration.

In addition, on page 5 of the City of Santa Monica’s Homelessness Strategic Plan one of the first stated values of the plan is to be transparent. I quote: “Transparent. We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community.” The mission statement of the strategic plan also claims to “promote the wellbeing of all”, but that clearly was not followed in the case of 413/825 Ocean Avenue.

Sincerely,
John Skinner
323 9th Street
Santa Monica, CA 90402
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1744 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 340
[email protected]
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1745 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 341
Mitchell Kois
From: Mayes, Mike <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 8:42 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: RE: Item 16B Support for Negrete

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmembers,
I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

We have organized hundreds of people in days, soon it will be thousands, and we are all deeply concerned about the planned opening of the homeless shelter on Ocean Avenue intended to serve seriously mentally ill, drug addicted and homeless individuals.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1746 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 342
It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who attend the impacted schools.

Protect our neighborhood, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Mike Mayes
Resident of 90403 and parent at Roosevelt elementary school Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1747 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 343
Mitchell Kois
From: Sela Obot <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 8:41 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16-Negrate

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmembers and Neighborhood Representatives,
I write in absolute opposition to locating a mental-health supportive housing facility at 413 and 429 Ocean Avenue. As someone who lives at 201 Ocean Avenue, I will myself and others be placed at real risk. The asserted safety improvements touted by proponents are speculative; many credible studies suggest the opposite is plausible — particularly in a dense urban neighborhood with high street activity and limited buffer zones.

Below are the reasons why crime is very likely to increase and why this proposal should be rejected outright.

Why crime will likely skyrocket

1. Empirical evidence of crime increases around similar facilities o A study of emergency winter shelters in Vancouver found a 56% increase in property crime within 100 m of an opened shelter (theft, vandalism) compared to when the shelter was closed.
o That same study noted that crime impact is highly localized to within ~400 meters (2–3 block radius).
o Although not exactly the same as a full-time supportive housing facility, these results show how proximity shelters can attract opportunistic crime. o In other settings of homeless shelters, business owners and neighbors have reported unintended negative spillover: increased loitering, petty theft, drug-use paraphernalia depositing, and safety concerns. (E.g. reports around navigation centers in Vancouver). o Thus, installing such a facility in a densely mixed-residential corridor provides fertile ground for crime “hotspotting” — especially at night, when guard supervision is lower and perimeter control is harder.

2. Routine Activity theory / criminology logic
o Theory supports the notion that increased opportunities + decreased guardianship lead to more crime. When you bring in a vulnerable population, some with histories of substance use, mental health crises, or prior criminal justice contact, the likelihood of incidents (drug dealing, trespass, disorderly behavior, confrontations) rises. The more transient or loosely monitored the population, the greater that risk.
o If internal security is lax, poorly staffed, or reactive rather than proactive, the facility becomes a magnet for external criminal actors (drug suppliers, opportunists) who exploit vulnerabilities. In effect, you’re importing crimes of opportunity, not just accommodating a “stable” group.

3. Evidence is mixed — we cannot assume “no harm”
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1748 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 344
o Supporters often point to studies that show neutral or negligible crime change after supportive housing (e.g. Been et al. 2008 found no statistically significant uptick in NYC neighborhoods). But those studies typically involve lower-acuity, rigorously monitored projects, often in denser metro contexts with more police presence and buffer populations. They are not analogous to a high-intensity mental-health facility in a narrow, high-foot-traffic corridor adjacent to residential homes. o Moreover, many academic reviews state that limited research exists on how high-acuity, lower-barrier housing (for persons with serious mental health or substance-use histories) affects crime, especially in local neighborhoods. o Hence, proponents rely on weak “no effect” conclusions — but we are not in a position to gamble on worst-case externalities.

4. Safety for women and vulnerable neighbors is especially at risk o As a woman, my fear is not abstract. Panic, harassment, confrontations, late-night breakins, disorder — these escalate quickly in transitional populations and under-resourced security.
o When security is stretched, patrols may lag, and external public areas adjacent to the facility may become staging points for illicit behavior that preys on passersby — especially in low-visibility hours. That is not paranoia; it is the predictable consequence of mixing high-risk operations next to residential zones.

Oppose it entirely, not “with conditions”
Given the elevated risk, this proposal should be flatly rejected at this location. No amount of “conditions,” “oversight,” or “staffing guarantees” can fully eliminate danger when the surrounding environment is ill-suited.

If the City insists on pursuing supportive housing, do it somewhere else — a location with:
 Wider setbacks from residential streets
 Proximity to service hubs, medical infrastructure, and police support  Fewer children’s walk routes and fewer pedestrians going by late at night  Further from schools
But here, among tightly built housing fronts on Ocean Avenue, a facility is a wrong fit.

Alternative use: serve elderly fire victims to align with zoning The property is zoned for elderly housing. If the City must repurpose, it should prioritize elderly homeowners in our community whose homes were destroyed by the Palisades fire or those who cannot afford to rebuild.

This alternative serves those who are less risky, more stable, and critically in need of housing. It would be far less burdensome to manage and would align with neighborhood character.

Final statement
 I completely reject placing a mental-health housing facility at or near 201 Ocean Avenue.  The risk of crime escalation, especially in our immediate environment, is too high to justify.  If the City wants to help, it must find another site—not in our residential corridor—and must prioritize fire-ruined elderly residents who deserve compassion, not new risks to our families.

Please record this opposition in the official file, confirm receipt, and notify me of any hearings. I will show up and speak against it.

Best,
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1749 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 345
Sela Obot
Sources:

1. https://www.santamonica.gov/crime-statistics

2. https://www.santamonica.gov/topic-explainers/crime-reports-and-statistics

3. https://www.neighborhoodscout.com/ca/santa-monica/crime

4. https://www.areavibes.com/santa+monica-ca/crime

5. https://smdp.com

6. https://ucr.fbi.gov

7. https://www.crimemapping.com

8. https://furmancenter.org/files/publications/A3ImpactofSHonNeighborhoods_000.pdf

9. https://crim.sas.upenn.edu/sites/default/files/Ridgeway_Effect%20of%20Emergency%20Shelter s-v5_1.2.2018.pdf

10. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6659163
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1750 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 346
Mitchell Kois
From: Sean Fulp <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 8:35 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Santa Monica City Manager's Office
Cc: [email protected]; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems Subject: Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Facilities for the Unhoused with Severe Mental Crises at 413/825 Ocean Ave Attachments: Letter to SM Mayor, Manager and City Council RE 413 & 825 Ocean Ave.pdf

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete, Honorable Members of the City Council, and City Manager Chi, I am writing to express my sincerest support for Mayor Negrete who has single handedly brought to light the non-transparent nature in which two facilities for the severely mentally ill were approved near schools, senior centers, and parks without any publicly available impact analyses, stakeholder notification, or community input per Welfare & Institutions Code §5604.2(a)(4). I stand with my fellow Santa Monicans to request a suspension of the facilities at 413 Ocean Ave and 825 Ocean Ave until all six elements in Mayor Negrete’s memo are complete and publicly posted, particularly Item #6, which asks for a citywide comprehensive and transparent site review process for such facilities.

The issue is not about opposing care, it is about ensuring that care is delivered responsibly, safely, cost effectively, and with dignity for all. The Mayor’s call for coordination between the City, Los Angeles County, and nonprofit providers ensures that these projects will be guided by expertise, empathy, and accountability. The community should be viewed as partners in this endeavor, to help all parties achieve the outcomes that benefit the wellbeing of all, which is one of the stated mission in the City’s Homelessness Strategic Plan.

By calling for clarity on zoning, transparency in developer practices, and robust public outreach, Mayor Negrete is not creating barriers to progress, she is building trust, ensuring that our city’s compassion is matched by competence in every single neighborhood across this city. This approach strengthens our collective ability to help people heal, stabilize, and reintegrate into the community.

Her leadership reminds us that compassion and accountability are not opposing values, they are inseparable. A community that truly cares about its most vulnerable must also care deeply about how decisions are made, how funds are spent, and how every stakeholder is treated.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1751 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 347
I stand in full support of Mayor Negrete’s efforts to make Santa Monica a model for both compassionate care and transparent governance. Los Angeles County should not be driving decisions that impact all of our communities without accountability, and thus, we simultaneously call on Third District LA County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath to intervene – to both pause funding for these projects and support Mayor Negrete’s detailed request.

Sincerely,
Sean Fulp 3019 Wilshire Blvd, #138 Santa Monica, CA
cc: Third District Los Angeles County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1752 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) October 12, 2025
The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
[Sent via email: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]]
RE: Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Facilities for the Unhoused with Severe Mental Crises at 413/825 Ocean Ave Dear Mayor Negrete, Honorable Members of the City Council, and City Manager Chi, I am writing to express my sincerest support for Mayor Negrete who has singlehandedly brought to light the non-transparent nature in which two facilities for the severely mentally ill were approved near schools, senior centers, and parks without any publicly available impact analyses, stakeholder notification, or community input per Welfare & Institutions Code §5604.2(a)(4)). I stand with my fellow Santa Monicans to request a suspension of the facilities at 413 Ocean Ave and 825 Ocean Ave until all six elements in Mayor Negrete’s memo are complete and publicly posted, particularly Item #6, which asks for a citywide comprehensive and transparent site review process for such facilities.

Docusign Envelope ID: BE1D0320-964F-4A8F-B3CE-8BB343343657 Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1753 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) By calling for clarity on zoning, transparency in developer practices, and robust public outreach, Mayor Negrete is not creating barriers to progress—she is building trust, ensuring that our city’s compassion is matched by competence in every single neighborhood across this city. This approach strengthens our collective ability to help people heal, stabilize, and reintegrate into the community.

Sincerely,
Sean Fulp
3019 Wilshire Blvd, #138
Santa Monica, CA
cc: Third District Los Angeles County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath Docusign Envelope ID: BE1D0320-964F-4A8F-B3CE-8BB343343657 Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1754 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 348
Mitchell Kois
From: Dena Cook <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 8:36 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Ocean Avenue Homeless Shelter - Item 16B Support for Negrete Importance: High

EXTERNAL
Dear Council members,
I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

The first public discussion on this topic took place Thursday, October 9th during a NOMA informational zoom meeting. However, it was clear the intention of St. Joseph’s and LA County was to open the facility illegally and without notice or community input. More so, fully formed operational polices or adequate safety measures to protect the surrounding neighborhood were not and have not been presented or accepted.

St. Joseph’s also shared a timeline that implicated city staƯ and at least 3 Councilmember’s, all who were informed of the project since February and provided no community outreach, further violating our rights.

Furthermore, I am concerned to have learned from St. Joseph’s that individuals in this shelter will not be subject to drug testing or complete background checks, yet they will be permitted to exit and and enter the facility and community freely during the day. This poses significant risks to our community, especially given the proximity of schools, community parks and local residents. Additionally, it was suggested that others looking for homeless services would benefit from outreach being conducted in the surrounding area, eƯectively putting more homeless, mentally ill and drug addicts in the neighborhood. You are not simply housing 49 people you are a beacon to everyone looking for homeless services.

Personally, I would like to highlight that the elementary school my children attend, Carlthorp School, is located just 0.3 miles from the planned shelter location. In addition to Carlthorp, multiple other preschools and elementary schools in close proximity, educating thousands of elementary-aged students. The potential impact on the safety and well-being of these children and staƯ members cannot be overstated. It is illegal for anyone on the sex registry to live within a mile of a school and your suggested background check process is not measurable or complete.

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1755 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 349
concerns surrounding another one his projects: https://www.latimes.com/homeless-housing/story/2024-11- 05/new-owner-cuts-security-janitors-at-skid-row-homeless-housing-as-tenants-fear-worsening-conditions Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who attend the impacted schools.

Protect our children, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Dena Cook
Dena Cook | Co-founder
310.600.7160
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1756 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 350
Mitchell Kois
From: Aaron Lubin <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 8:33 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: 413 Ocean Ave.; my elderly parents live at 433 Ocean Ave...

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete, City Manager Chi, and Honorable Members of the City Council, I am writing as a Santa Monica resident (as well as on behalf of my 86 year-old parents) to express my concerns about the secretive negotiations between unnamed City Council Members, the City’s Housing and Human Services Department (HHS), the County Department of Mental Health (DMH) to fund – with taxpayer money – a 49-bed facility for the unhoused and several mentally ill. This project, according to the CEO of St. Joseph’s Center, was brought forward to the County only once a private developer who is currently suing the City of Santa Monica, sought out the County and St. Joseph’s to offer up his sites at 413 Ocean Avenue and 825 Ocean Avenue.

We request the City and County work together to request a delay of the project at 413/825 Ocean Ave. until all of the items in 16-B have been discussed in public hearings and a new analysis explaining the rationale behind this project, the alternative sites that were considered, and if the County made a decision that is in compliance with the needs defined by the City and its residents.

Specifically, as it relates to Item 16-B:

1. Comprehensive Outreach and Communication
We strongly support Direction #1, which calls for coordination between the City, LA County Department of Mental Health (DMH), St. Joseph Center, and the project developer to ensure robust outreach to residents and nearby businesses— including the numerous schools, hotels, small businesses, and other stakeholders along Ocean Avenue and its surrounding radius. Residents and local business owners deserve timely notice and a chance to understand project goals, operations, and impacts. Transparent engagement fosters cooperation rather than conflict and ensures that city decisions reflect both compassion and local input.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1757 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 351

Every Santa Monican deserves to understand what are allowable uses for the buildings in their communities, particularly around communities that serve children and seniors.

4. Public Explanation of Land Use and Operational Standards Direction #4 calls for a clear public explanation of the legal basis that allows these facilities to operate without a discretionary City permit. Residents must understand the distinctions between a mental health facility, a transitional housing facility, an emergency shelter, and supportive housing—and how each is governed under City and State law. The Mayor’s proposed public communications strategy—including a dedicated FAQ webpage, hotline for concerns, and clear follow-up protocols— is precisely the kind of accessible, fact-based communication the community needs. The fact that no one has yet been able to access any public documentation regarding the process and application in which these facilities were approved and funded with taxpayer funds speaks to the lack of transparency the law requires.

5. Verification of Developer Qualifications and Financial Transparency Direction #5’s call for verification of the developer’s goals, operational record, legal standing, and compensation from LA County is essential for accountability. Residents have a right to know who is behind these projects, how public funds are being used, and whether any conflicts of interest or active litigation exist. This transparency builds confidence in both the City’s and County’s stewardship of public resources, and that site selection is driven by thoughtful due diligence, published documentation, and needs analyses that demonstrate funding needs are matched to the highest and best use, instead of driven by calls from developers who are seeking subsidized operations while they seek entitlements.

In addition, on page 5 of the City of Santa Monica’s Homelessness Strategic Plan one of the first stated values of the plan is to be transparent. I quote: “Transparent. We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community.” The mission statement of the strategic plan also claims to “promote the wellbeing of all”, but that clearly was not followed in the case of 413/825 Ocean Avenue.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1758 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 352
Best,
Aaron Lubin
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1759 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 353
Mitchell Kois
From: Donna Ferrentino <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 8:31 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Item 16B Support for Negrete

EXTERNAL

I stand with my fellow Santa Monicans to request an immediate psuspension of the facilities at 413 Ocean Ave and 825 Ocean Ave until all six elements in Mayor Negrete’s memo are complete and publicly posted, particularly Item #6, which asks for a citywide comprehensive and transparent site review process for such facilities.

While tonight’s item appears to only be relevant to the two addresses above, this issue has citywide implications as it demonstrates that our city lacks a process to expend taxpayer funds in compliance with state law and the spirit of our City’s Strategic Plan on Homelessness, which require community and professional involvement at every stage. These provisions are designed to guarantee that the voices of those with experience of mental illness, along with residents, local businesses, and first responders, are all heard, respected, and accounted for – particularly as our city faces significant financial shortfalls.

The issue is not about opposing care—it is about ensuring that care is delivered responsibly, safely, cost effectively, and with dignity for all.

The Mayor’s call for coordination between the City, Los Angeles County, and nonprofit providers ensures that these projects will be guided by expertise, empathy, and accountability. The community should be viewed as partners in this endeavor, to help all parties achieve the outcomes that benefit the wellbeing of all, which is one of the stated mission in the City’s Homelessness Strategic Plan.

By calling for clarity on zoning, transparency in developer practices, and robust public outreach, Mayor Negrete is not creating barriers to progress—she is building trust, ensuring that our city’s compassion is matched by competence in every single neighborhood across Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1760 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 354
this city. This approach strengthens our collective ability to help people heal, stabilize, and reintegrate into the community.

Sincerely,
Donna Ferrentino
868 BrookTree Road
LA CA 90272
Rustic Canyon Resident
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1761 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 355
Mitchell Kois
From: Sean Casto <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 8:25 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Item 16- Negrete . Opposing the project
Attachments: Opposition_Letter_Sean_Casto.docx

EXTERNAL
To whom it may concern,
Please see my letter in opposition of the project on 413/825 Ocean Avenue attached Warmest Regards,
Sean
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1762 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) Subject: Item 16-Negrete – Opposition to Homeless Shelter Project at 413/825 Ocean Avenue
Dear Mayor Negrete and Members of the Santa Monica City Council, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed homeless shelter developments at 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue. I recognize the need to address homelessness and mental health issues in our community, but placing such a facility in a dense residential and family area is not the right approach.

The proposed sites sit across from a park filled with children every day, as well as seniors and local families who rely on that space for recreation. This proposal poses significant safety and quality-of-life concerns. Our city already struggles to manage the growing crisis of homelessness, and adding another intensive-use facility here will only strain our already limited resources.

This project risks creating unsafe conditions, depressing property values, and undermining the progress our community has made in improving safety and livability. I urge the Council to consider alternative sites that balance compassion with practicality and safety for all residents.

Thank you for considering the voices of local families who care deeply about the future of Santa Monica.

Sincerely,
Sean Casto
201 Ocean Ave., Apt. 1006B
Santa Monica, California
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1763 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 356
Mitchell Kois
From: Amara Teresa Hastings <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 8:28 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: [email protected]; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Natalya Zernitskaya
Subject: 413 & 825 Ocean Avenue Mental Health Facilities

EXTERNAL
RE: Item 16B Support for Negrete
Dear Coucilmembers,
I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

I am deeply concerned about the planned opening of the homeless shelters on Ocean Avenue intended to serve 49 seriously mentally ill, drug addicted and homeless individuals. Especially the one on Ocean at Georgina, closest to my home.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

In Santa Monica it takes so much effort to get permits to do simple home maintenance work. And I personally spent a lot of time, and energy supporting the creation of the Rainbow Garden on Montana and 4th, as the city talked to neighbors, had public input, etc. That was for a GARDEN. And now there apparently were secretive plans to allow a shelter for mentally ill people at the end of our street without any public conversation at all. This is unacceptable.

The first public discussion on this topic took place on Thursday, October 9th during a NOMA informational zoom meeting. However, it was clear the intention of St. Joseph’s and LA County was to open the facility illegally and without notice, or community input. More so, fully formed operational polices or adequate safety measures to protect the surrounding neighborhood were not and have not been presented or accepted.

Furthermore, I am concerned to have learned from St. Joseph’s that individuals in this shelter will not be subject to drug testing or complete background checks, yet they will be permitted to exit and and enter the facility and community freely during the day. This poses significant risks to our community, especially given the proximity of schools, community parks and local residents. Additionally, it was suggested that others looking for homeless services would benefit from outreach being conducted in the surrounding area, effectively putting more homeless, mentally ill and drug addicts in the neighborhood. You are not simply housing 49 people you are a beacon to everyone looking for homeless services.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1764 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 357
It is clear your security plan beyond the shelter is not complete or adequate. The reputation of your owner and “partner” in this facility was highlighted in this LA Times article from last year and details serious safety concerns surrounding another one his projects: https://www.latimes.com/homelesshousing/story/2024-11-05/new-owner-cuts-security-janitors-at-skid-row-homeless-housing-as-tenantsfear-worsening-conditions Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who live in the neighborhood and attend the impacted schools.

Protect our neighborhood, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Please see and sign this petition! It has grown significantly in numbers in a matter of just a few days. https://c.org/48yK5yYxtj
Sincerely,
Amara Hastings
Georgina Avenue Resident
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1765 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 358
Mitchell Kois
From: Erik Hodge <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 8:16 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Facilities for the Unhoused with Severe Mental Crises at 413/825 Ocean Ave

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete, Honorable Members of the City Council, and City Manager Chi, My name is Erik Hodge and I am a resident of Santa Monica, along with my children, Lleyton (age 4), Belle (age 2) and my wife (pregnant with baby number 3).

I am writing to express my sincerest support for Mayor Negrete who has brought to light the nontransparent nature in which two facilities for the severely mentally ill were approved near schools, senior centers, and parks without any publicly available impact analyses, stakeholder notification, or community input per Welfare and Institutions Code §5604.2(a)(4)). I stand with my fellow Santa Monicans to request a suspension of the facilities at 413 Ocean Ave and 825 Ocean Ave until all six elements in Mayor Negrete’s memo are complete and publicly posted, particularly Item #6, which asks for a citywide comprehensive and transparent site review process for such facilities.

While tonight’s item appears to be only relevant to the two addresses above, this issue has citywide implications as it demonstrates that our city lacks a process to expend taxpayer funds in compliance with state law and the spirit of our City’s Strategic Plan on Homelessness, which require community and professional involvement at every stage.

By calling for clarity on zoning, transparency in developer practices, and robust public outreach, Mayor Negrete is not creating barriers to progress—she is building trust, ensuring that our city’scompassion is matched by competence in every single neighborhood across this city. This approach strengthens our collective ability to help people heal, stabilize, and reintegrate into the community.

A community that truly cares about its most vulnerable must also care deeply about how decisions are made, how funds are spent, and how every stakeholder is treated. Los Angeles County should not be driving decisions that impact all of our communities without accountability, and thus, we simultaneously call on Third District LA County Supervisor Lindsay Horvath to intervene – to both pause funding for these projects and support Mayor Negrete’s detailed request.

Sincerely,
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1766 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 359
Erik Hodge
226 Palisades Ave
Santa Monica, Ca 90402
310 779 2360
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1767 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 360
Mitchell Kois
From: Alex amirkhanian <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 8:10 PM
To: Council Mailbox
Cc: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; [email protected] Subject: Homeless Shelter 413 Ocean ave.

EXTERNAL
Dear Members of the City Council,
I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed homeless shelter at 413 Ocean Ave. and 825 Ocean. While I understand the importance of addressing homelessness in our community, I believe this location is unsuitable for such a facility, and I respectfully urge the council to reconsider this proposal.

My primary concerns include:

1. Impact on Neighborhood Safety and Quality of Life: The proposed location is in close proximity to residential areas, schools, and local businesses. Increased foot traffic and potential loitering could create safety concerns for residents and visitors, particularly families with young children.

2. Lack of Community Input: Many residents feel that there has been insufficient transparency and engagement with the community regarding this proposal. A project of this magnitude requires thorough consultation with those who will be directly affected.

3. Alternative Locations: There may be more suitable locations for a homeless shelter that are less disruptive to residential and commercial areas, such as sites with better access to public transportation and existing social services.

I strongly support efforts to provide compassionate solutions for homelessness, but these efforts must balance the needs of all community members. I respectfully request that the city council explore alternative locations and engage in further dialogue with residents to address these concerns.

Thank you for your time and consideration. I urge you to prioritize the well-being of our neighborhood and reconsider the placement of the shelter at 413 Ocean Ave. I look forward to attending any public hearings on this matter and contributing to a constructive discussion.

Sincerely,
Alex Amirkhanian
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1768 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 361
Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 8:04 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Facilities for the Unhoused with Severe Mental Crises at 413/825 Ocean Ave

EXTERNAL
To the Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council — As a homeowner and parent of young children in the neighborhood, I’m wriƟng to express my concern about the process by which approvals were granted for the new housing faciliƟes on Ocean Avenue which have become an important topic of conversaƟon over the past week.

My understanding is that proper protocols to seek input from the community about these faciliƟes may not have been followed. I would therefore urge you to immediately pause whatever approvals have been given which are allowing the opening process for the faciliƟes to conƟnue, so that a proper invesƟgaƟon of what happened can be conducted.

It seems to me that there are enough quesƟon marks that exist about the approval process and severe concern on the part of residents, business owners, and schools in the area of the faciliƟes should they indeed be opened that this would be the most prudent course of acƟon.

Many thanks for your consideraƟon of my posiƟon of this maƩer.

Doug Scherrer
203 20th Street in Santa Monica
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1769 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 362
Mitchell Kois
From: warren brand <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 7:59 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya
Subject: Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Shelters for the Severely Mentally Ill at 413/825 Ocean Ave

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete, City Manager Chi, and Honorable Members of the City Council, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the process by which approvals and funding were secured for the two proposed mental health housing facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue. During the community town hall held on Thursday, October 9th, reps from the LA County Department of Mental Health confirmed that these facilities will not require background checks or sobriety. These policies raise serious safety and accountability concerns for nearby residents.

At the same time, I want to express my full support for Mayor Lana Negrete’s leadership and her recent memo calling for transparency and accountability surrounding these projects. Her call for clarity reflects the type of leadership Santa Monica needs at this critical time.

As a resident living next door to one of these sites, I can personally attest to the ongoing challenges in our neighborhood. We already experience frequent disturbances in the alleys and surrounding streets due to unhoused individuals. There have been repeated incidents of thefts and people sleeping or bathing in shared residential amenities such as our pool and jacuzzi. Our building is home to many seniors and families with young children, and these conditions already create a sense of vulnerability and unease.

Our community cares deeply about helping those who are struggling with homelessness and mental illness. However, these facilities are being placed in areas surrounded by senior housing, preschools, and elementary schools, all within a half-mile radius. Placing such facilities in dense residential and tourism-heavy zones, rather than near major transit lines in commercial or industrial areas, presents significant challenges for both the residents of the facilities and the surrounding community The Ocean Avenue and Palisades Park area plays a vital role in Santa Monica’s economy, supporting small businesses, schools, senior facilities, and tourism. The revenue generated here helps sustain essential city services at a time when our finances are already strained. It is critical that decisions of this magnitude are made with care, foresight, and full transparency.

For these reasons, I strongly urge the City Council to pause the opening of the 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue facilities until all due diligence has been completed and public hearings have been held.

Moving forward without proper review, impact studies, or open community discussion would undermine public trust and risk the safety and stability of both residents and future program participants. A temporary pause is a responsible and necessary step to ensure that Santa Monica approaches this issue thoughtfully and in accordance with its own standards for community engagement.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1770 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 363
Finally, I ask that the Council uphold the values outlined in Santa Monica’s Homelessness Strategic Plan, which begins with a commitment to transparency:
“We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community.”
The plan also commits to “promote the wellbeing of all,” yet that principle was not followed in the case of 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue. Our city deserves a process that honors those words through open dialogue, data-driven decisions, and respect for all stakeholders.

Thank you for your service to our community and for considering this important matter with the seriousness and care it deserves.

Sincerely,
Warren Brand
Resident
Ocean Ave. Santa Monica
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1771 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 364
Mitchell Kois
From: Laura Marcus <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 7:58 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Council Mailbox
Subject: Item 16-Negrete

EXTERNAL
Dear City Council,
I am wriƟng to express my deep concern and disappointment over the manner in which the Los Angeles County Department of mental health advanced the voluntary entry/exit faciliƟes at 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue for the unhoused and severely mentally ill without prior public noƟce or community engagement.

As City of Santa Monica Mayor Lana Negrete made clear in her October 9, 2025 memo to the Santa Monica City Manager, even the city of Santa Monica was “recently made aware“ of the counƟes acƟons aŌer funding and have been approved and renovaƟons were already underway. Residence were blindsided, leŌ to discover this project through rumor rather than proper noƟficaƟon. This was not a clerical error– – it was a profound failure of transparency.

The Mayor’s memo further highlights that the county and its nonprofit partners neglected to comply with welfare and instrucƟons code. §5604.2(a)(4), which explicitly requires ciƟzen and professional involvement at all stages of the planning process. That includes residence, local businesses, schools, and those directly impacted by such faciliƟes. None of these stakeholders were given that opportunity.

Instead, this project was quietly advanced without consideraƟon of the preschools, elementary schools, senior, living faciliƟes, and impacts on the ciƟes, tourism hub that generates millions in revenue for a city already under fiscal strain.

The secretary surrounding this process has eroded public trust and undermine the very principles of open governance you have publicly Champion.

While LA County and St. Joseph Center’s newly released FAQ aƩempts to assure the public that the site will provide “24/7 staffing“ and “enhanced security,“ it is evident there is no coordinated plan to provide safety beyond the walls of these faciliƟes, as discussed at the October 9th Town Hall, where the LA County DMH, and St. Joseph’s presented.

Transparency aŌer the fact is not transparency – – it’s damage control.

In addiƟon, on page 5 of the city of Santa Monica‘s homelessness strategic plan one of the first stated values of the plan is to be transparent. I quote: “Transparency. We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intenƟons, decisions, and results to the foster the trust of our community.” The mission statement of the strategic plan also claims to “promote the well-being of all“, but that clearly was not followed as we have outlines.

The people of Santa Monica are not opposed to providing mental healthcare or supporƟve housing. We are opposed to being cut out of decisions that so profoundly affect our children, elderly, neighborhoods, schools, small businesses, safety, and economic stability. you owe this community an explanaƟon and must put a pause to the opening of these faciliƟes unƟl proper due diligence is completed in a public forum that is in compliance with the law.

We urge you to pause the opening of the mental health faciliƟes at 413 Ocean Avenue and 825 Ocean Avenue and launch an invesƟgaƟon into the approach that was taken to approve these faciliƟes,, and sites unƟl a full review is conducted with full transparency and meaningful public engagement.

Sincerely,
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1772 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 365
Laura Marcus
Wilmot Neighborhood
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1773 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 366
Mitchell Kois
From: Esther Cameron <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 7:54 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16B-Negrete

EXTERNAL
I oppose this non-transparent process and LA County Supervisor Lindsay Horvath's plan to open a 49 bed facility for the Severely Mentally Ill at 413 and 825 Ocean Ave.

Esther Cameron
909 Arizona Ave. #1
Santa Monica CA 90401
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1774 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 367
Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 7:44 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Item 16B-Negrete

EXTERNAL
Hi,
This bill is highly unacceptable and I vehemently oppose. We don’t need more mental health faciliƟes in Santa Monica where we walk our dogs and babies and already have to worry about our safety with all the homeless and mentally ill.

I was walking today with my newborn and was almost assaulted by a mentally ill individual. I called 911 immediately. As a mother alone with a newborn I felt unsafe and scared for the life of my child. We do not need more of these types of people in Santa Monica.

This is completely outrageous and not what Santa Monica needs. I am a taxpayer here and we should have had a say in this. Absolutely disgraceful.

Thanks,
Lauren Kolodny
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1775 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 368
Mitchell Kois
From: Jenni Pfaff <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 7:34 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Item 16B-Negrete

EXTERNAL
Hi City CouncilI have never reached out before, but this topic is too important for me to sit quietly. Please please please help the residents of Santa Monica. I absolutely oppose the non-transparent process and LA County Supervisor Lindsay Horvath's plan to open a 49 bed facility for the severely mentally ill at 413 and 825 Ocean Ave. How and why could this happen? This is our beautiful, special community where we walk safely with our children. This is unacceptable.

Please take this seriously.

Jenni Pfaff
Santa Monica, CA resident.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1776 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 369
Mitchell Kois
From: Matt Held <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 7:23 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Lauren Kolodny Held; Santa Monicans United
Subject: Item 16B-Negrete

EXTERNAL
Hello,
I strongly oppose this bill, project, non-transparent process and LA County Supervisor Lindsay Horvath’s Plan to open a 49 Bed facility for the Severely Mentally Ill at 413 and 825 Ocean Ave.

I live about a mile away (900 block of Arizona Ave, 90401), but walk through the park regularly with my dog and baby in a stroller.

This is blatantly illegal and a violation of every persons right to peace and quiet enjoyment of a public area. These mentally sick people ruin the city and make walking around extremely dangerous. I witness this every day a block away from my home at reed park where there are needle exchanges. In fact, today a couple with a stroller was chased by a lunatic homeless person and yelling for help - check the police record if you don’t believe me.

What this proposal is attempting to do is beyond illegal and myself and a coalition of local Santa Monicans plan on suing the city, county, council members, and primarily the county supervisor.

What yall are doing in unacceptable and you will not proceed.

I look forward to our day in court if you decide to pursue disgusting plan without proper disclosure, discussion and voting by local representatives.

Sincerely,
Matt Held
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1777 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 370
Mitchell Kois
From: Valerie Rokhlin <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 7:16 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Fwd: Item 16B Support

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmembers,
I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

We have organized hundreds of people in days, soon it will be thousands, and we are all deeply concerned about the planned opening of the homeless shelter on Ocean Avenue intended to serve seriously mentally ill, drug addicted and homeless individuals.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

It is clear your security plan beyond the shelter is not complete or adequate. The reputation of your owner and “partner” in this facility has been called into question with reporting by the LA Times.

Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who attend the impacted schools.

Protect our neighborhood, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Valerie Rokhlin
834 4th St, Apt 103, Santa Monica CA, 90403
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1778 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 371
Mitchell Kois
From: Chris Lapierre <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 7:11 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16B Support

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmembers,
I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

We have organized hundreds of people in days, soon it will be thousands, and we are all deeply concerned about the planned opening of the homeless shelter on Ocean Avenue intended to serve seriously mentally ill, drug addicted and homeless individuals.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who attend the impacted schools.

Protect our neighborhood, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Chris Lapierre
834 4th St, Apt 103, Santa Monica CA, 90403
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1779 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 372
Mitchell Kois
From: Jared Ablon <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 6:53 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Council Mailbox
Subject: Item 16B Support for Negrete

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmembers,
I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1780 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 373
It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who attend the impacted schools.

Protect our neighborhood, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Jared Ablon
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1781 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 374
Mitchell Kois
From: Douglas Spencer <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 6:41 PM
To: Council Mailbox; Clerk Mailbox; councilmtgitems; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Opposition to Item 16 - Negrete: High-Acuity Supportive Housing Facility at 413 Ocean Ave

EXTERNAL
Dear Santa Monica City Council Members,
I am writing as a concerned long-time resident of Santa Monica, where I have lived for over 25 years, to strongly oppose Item 16 - Negrete.

This proposal involves a 47-unit high-acuity supportive housing facility at 413 Ocean Ave, planned by LA County and St. Joseph Center for individuals with serious mental illness who are free to come and go. As a taxpayer-funded project on prime oceanfront real estate directly across from Palisades Park and family-oriented areas, it raises profound concerns about public safety, fiscal responsibility, and a blatant lack of community input.

In my professional career spanning more than 20 years as an executive leader in financial institutions and organizational management—including roles as President and CEO of Gilmore Bank and Diva Limousine, and current service as President of the Spencer Family Trust managing property portfolios in Santa Monica—I have consistently prioritized stakeholder engagement, risk mitigation, and community enhancement. My involvement on non-profit boards and as a guest lecturer at UCLA has deepened my commitment to fostering safe, thriving neighborhoods. This background compels me to speak out against a project that could undermine the very fabric of our community without adequate safeguards.

Public safety risks are paramount: Past high-acuity facilities in Santa Monica have correlated directly with increased crime, disturbances, and safety incidents. This site's proximity to families and park visitors heightens the instability risks for high-acuity residents without secure systems in place.

Moreover, leasing luxury oceanfront property squanders millions in taxpayer dollars that should fund dedicated treatment campuses, not exacerbate spillover in inappropriate residential zones.

The opacity of this process is indefensible. Our community was blindsided, with no consultation before the decision, and critical details remain absent—security protocols, screening, oversight, or even the true scope of the "temporary" five-year term (with no barriers to renewal or expansion). This mirrors the disastrous Manor on Pico Boulevard, where inadequate supervision, resident complaints, safety breaches, and failed communication with city leaders resulted in a judgment of operational failure due to oversight lapses.

I demand substantive answers to these essential questions prior to any approval:

1. What specific security plan, including 24/7 guard presence, incident response, and reporting, will be enforced?

2. Who will be excluded (e.g., violent offenders), and who oversees enforcement?

3. How will the open-door policy be managed to prevent risks from unresponsive patients, and by whom?

4. Given taxpayer funds addressing spillover here, why not select more suitable sites?

5. Will renewal or expansion be possible after five years? Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1782 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 375
I attended the neighborhood meeting on October 9 with the NOMA Association and facility operators, where dozens of residents echoed these fears. I urge the Council to reject this proposal decisively, safeguarding our neighborhood's safety, transparency, and prudent use of public resources.

As someone deeply invested in Santa Monica's future—both personally and through my property management and community leadership—I am available to discuss this further.

Thank you for your urgent attention. I await your response and a firm commitment to our community's well-being.

Sincerely,
Douglas C. Spencer
Spencer Family Trust
Santa Monica, CA 90402
[email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) (310) 897-4002
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/douglas-spencerCC: City Clerk ([email protected]) Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1783 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 376
Mitchell Kois
From: Margarita Casto <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 6:11 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Item 16 - Negrete. Opposition of the project on ovean ave Attachments: Opposition_Letter_Margarita_Casto.docx

EXTERNAL
To to whom it may concern,
Please see attached my letter in opposition of the project on 413/825 Ocean Avenue Best,
--
Margarita Casto
LBC Boston, CEO
(617) 206-4820 ext. 555 (O)
(516) 592-1620 (C)
1512 Hancock St - Quincy, MA 02169
www.lbcboston.com
Contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are confidential and are intended solely for addressee. The information may also be legally privileged. This transmission is sent in trust, for the sole purpose of delivery to the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail or phone and delete this message and its attachments, if any.

Sent from my iPhone
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1784 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) Subject: Item 16-Negrete – Opposition to Homeless Shelter Project at 413/825 Ocean Avenue
Dear Mayor Negrete and Members of the Santa Monica City Council, As a longtime resident of Santa Monica and a mother, I am writing to express my firm opposition to the proposed homeless shelter projects at 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue. While I wholeheartedly believe in supporting those experiencing homelessness, locating a facility for the severely mentally ill across from a park where hundreds of children play daily is deeply concerning.

This neighborhood already faces challenges with mental health and homelessness in public spaces. Introducing an additional high-need facility here will only increase safety risks for children, seniors, and families who live and spend time in this area. The strain on our already limited police and emergency resources will grow, and the sense of safety and community we value will diminish.

This project, as proposed, would also negatively impact property values and the stability of this residential neighborhood. I urge the Council to reject this location and instead pursue alternatives that are safer, more suitable, and properly equipped to serve this population responsibly.

Thank you for your attention to the wellbeing and safety of Santa Monica residents.

Sincerely,
Margarita Casto
201 Ocean Ave., Apt. 1006B
Santa Monica, California
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1785 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 377
Mitchell Kois
From: Cindy <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 6:13 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16B Support for Negrete

EXTERNAL
Dear Council members,
I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1786 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 378
It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who attend the impacted schools.

Protect our neighborhood, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Cindy Firestone
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1787 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 379
Mitchell Kois
From: Ryan Grossman <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 5:57 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Council Mailbox
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Insane ideas - ocean ave homeless shelter and insane asylum

EXTERNAL
To whom it may concern: (everyone in Santa Monica)
These facilities that are planned for prime real estate and family areas in Santa Monica are dangerous and unregulated spaces that are going to bring harm to our community.

The lack of notice and the fact they have no oversight are not a community effort to solve any problems, but a power play that will continue the degradation of our once great city.

It’s quite unfortunate that this was done the way it was, and the risks it brings to the community far outweigh the benefits it will bring to anyone, let alone the neighbors.

The area on Colorado, located by public transportation, and other homeless services seem to be a much more effective area, away from families, kids and tourists, rather than allowing people with drug problems and mental health problems to be directly exposed to kids and near homes that present an opportunity for people with problems to rob and hurt.

Please slow this process down for the properly input from the community and evaluation for better options as this community already has enough issues it needs to deal with.

There will be no psychiatrist, no drug testing, no medical licensing, no background checks. 49+ high risk people rotated every 90 days with minimal supervision allowed to come and go as they please.

I support mental health treatment but would implore you to do it with proper services and oversight and community input and involvement. Done safely, ethically and transparently.

Thank you,
Ryan Grossman
Grossman Estates
917 7th Street | Santa Monica, CA 90493
C: 310.739.7679
[email protected]
BettercallRyan.com
The sender believes that this E-mail and any attachments were free of any virus, worm, Trojan horse, and/or malicious code when sent. This Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1788 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 380
message and its attachments could have been infected during transmission. By reading the message and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts full responsibility for taking protecti ve and remedial action about viruses and other defects. The sender's company is not liable for any loss or damage arising in any way from this message or its attachments.

Nothing in this email shall be deemed to create a binding contract to purchase/sell real estate. The sender of this email does not have the authority to bind a buyer or seller to a contract via written or verbal communications including, but not limited to, email communications.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1789 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 381
Mitchell Kois
From: Wendy Overmire <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 5:57 PM
To: councilmtgitems; [email protected]
Subject: Item 16B Support for Negreta

EXTERNAL
Dear Coucilmembers,
I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

The first public discussion on this topic took place Thursday, October 9th during a NOMA informational zoom meeting. However, it was clear the intention of St. Joseph’s and LA County was to open the facility illegally and without notice or community input. More so, fully formed operational polices or adequate safety measures to protect the surrounding neighborhood were not and have not been presented or accepted.

Furthermore, I am concerned to have learned from St. Joseph’s that individuals in this shelter will not be subject to drug testing or complete background checks, yet they will be permitted to exit and and enter the facility and community freely during the day. This poses significant risks to our community, especially given the proximity of schools, community parks and local residents. Additionally, it was suggested that others looking for homeless services would benefit from outreach being conducted in the surrounding area, effectively putting more homeless, mentally ill and drug addicts in the neighborhood. You are not simply housing 49 people you are a beacon to everyone looking for homeless services.

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1790 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 382
schools in close proximity, educating thousands of elementary-aged students. The potential impact on the safety and well-being of these children and staff members cannot be overstated. It is illegal for anyone on the sex registry to live within a mile of a school and your suggested background check process is not measurable or complete.

It is clear your security plan beyond the shelter is not complete or adequate. The reputation of your owner and “partner” in this facility was highlighted in this LA Times article from last year and details serious safety concerns surrounding another one his
projects: https://www.latimes.com/homeless-housing/story/2024-11- 05/new-owner-cuts-security-janitors-at-skid-row-homeless-housing-astenants-fear-worsening-conditions Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who attend the impacted schools.

Protect our children, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Wendy Overmire
Santa Monica Resident and Parent
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1791 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 383
Mitchell Kois
From: Shenghan Zhang <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 5:34 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Item 16B Support for Negrete

EXTERNAL
Dear Coucilmembers,
I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

The first public discussion on this topic took place Thursday, October 9th during a NOMA informational zoom meeting. However, it was clear the intention of St. Joseph’s and LA County was to open the facility illegally and without notice or community input. More so, fully formed operational policies or adequate safety measures to protect the surrounding neighborhood were not and have not been presented or accepted.

St. Joseph’s also shared a timeline that implicated city staff and at least 3 Council members, all who were informed of the project since February and provided no community outreach, further violating our rights.

Furthermore, I am concerned to have learned from St. Joseph’s that individuals in this shelter will not be subject to drug testing or complete background checks, yet they will be permitted to exit and enter the facility and community freely during the day. This poses significant risks to our community, especially given the proximity of schools, community parks and local residents. Additionally, it was suggested that others looking for homeless services would benefit from outreach being conducted in the surrounding area, effectively putting more homeless, mentally ill and drug addicts in the neighborhood. You are not simply housing 49 people, you are a beacon to everyone looking for homeless services.

Personally, I would like to highlight that the elementary school my child attends, Carlthorp School, is located just 0.3 miles from the planned shelter location. In addition to Carlthorp, there are multiple other preschools and elementary schools in close proximity, educating thousands of elementary-aged students. The potential impact on the safety and well-being of these children and staff members cannot be overstated. It is illegal for anyone on the sex registry to live within a mile of a school and your suggested background check process is not measurable or complete.

It is clear your security plan beyond the shelter is not complete or adequate. The reputation of your Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1792 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 384
owner and “partner” in this facility was highlighted in this LA Times article from last year and details serious safety concerns surrounding another one his projects: https://www.latimes.com/homelesshousing/story/2024-11-05/new-owner-cuts-security-janitors-at-skid-row-homeless-housing-as-tenantsfear-worsening-conditions Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who attend the impacted schools.

Protect our children, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Shenghan Zhang
Carlthorp Parent
--
- Shenghan
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1793 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 385
Mitchell Kois
From: Stanley Weiser <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 5:13 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: CITY OF SM, ITEM 16B, and a request to delay the opening Attachments: City of SM - Item 16-B - Version 2 - SW-Support for Mayor 2.pdf Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1794 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) Oct. 12, 2025
The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
[Sent via email: [email protected]; [email protected]] RE: Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Facilities for the Unhoused with Severe Mental Crises at 413/825 Ocean Ave Dear Mayor Negrete, City Manager Chi, and Honorable Members of the City Council, I am writing to express my opposition to the process in which the facilities for the severely mentally ill were approved with taxpayer funds at 413 and 825 Ocean Ave.

I also share my heartfelt support for Mayor Lana Negrete’s leadership in addressing one of the most complex and sensitive challenges facing our community—how best to care for individuals living with severe mental illness and homelessness, while ensuring that our policies remain transparent, inclusive, and grounded in sound public process.

Mayor Negrete’s October 9 memorandum reflects a thoughtful and compassionate approach to public service. Her acknowledgment of the urgent need for behavioral health housing, coupled with her insistence on due diligence, community engagement, and transparency, embodies the balanced leadership Santa Monica deserves.

This issue is not about opposing care—it is about ensuring that care is delivered responsibly, safely, and with dignity for those it is meant to serve. The Mayor’s call for coordination between the City, Los Angeles County, and nonprofit providers ensures that these projects will be guided by expertise, empathy, and accountability.

Her emphasis on compliance with Welfare & Institutions Code §5604.2(a)(4))—which require citizen and professional involvement at every stage of planning—honors both the spirit and the letter of these laws. These provisions are designed to guarantee that the voices of those with lived experience of mental illness, along with residents, local businesses, and first responders, are all heard and respected. Given the facilities’ close proximity to several senior living facilities, preschools, and elementary schools, the lack of a general community safety plan and/or early notification is grossly negligent.

By calling for clarity on zoning, transparency in developer practices, and robust public outreach, Mayor Negrete is not creating barriers to progress—she is building trust, ensuring that our city’s compassion is matched by competence. This approach strengthens our collective ability to help people heal, stabilize, and reintegrate into the community.

I stand in full support of Mayor Negrete’s efforts to make Santa Monica a model for both compassionate care and transparent governance.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1795 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) As such, we hope you support all six requests in Mayor Negrete’s memo and pause the opening of the facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean until all the analyses are posted and shared with the public.

Thank you for your service to our city and for considering this important item.

Sincerely,
Stanley Weiser & Karen Klein
614 Palisades Ave.

Santa Monica, CA 90402
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1796 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 386
Mitchell Kois
From: Anna Batalin <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 5:08 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Re: Item 16B Support for Negrete

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmembers,
I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1797 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 387
It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who attend the impacted schools.

Protect our neighborhood, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Anna Batalin
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1798 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 388
Mitchell Kois
From: Maxim Batalin <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 5:06 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: RE: Item 16B Support for Negrete

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmembers,
I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1799 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 389
It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who attend the impacted schools.

Protect our neighborhood, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Maxim Batalin
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1800 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 390
Mitchell Kois
From: BRUCE GOLDSMITH <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 5:05 PM
To: councilmtgitems; [email protected]
Subject: Item 16-Negrete

EXTERNAL
I oppose this non-transparent process and LA county supervisor Lindsay Horvath's plan to open a 49 bed facility for the Severely Mentally Ill at 413 and 825 Ocean Ave.

Bruce Goldsmith
801 Ocean Ave
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1801 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 391
Mitchell Kois
From: Ryan Stouffer Smith <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 4:57 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Council Mailbox
Subject: Request to Delay Opening of Mental Health Facilities at 413 and 815 Ocean Ave.

EXTERNAL
Dear Trusted Coucilmembers,
I am a Santa Monica resident and parent of students at two independent schools (one elementary, one preschool) near 4th and Montana.

I am writing in support of Mayor Negrete's agenda item 16-B and to urge you to respect the legal due process rights of Santa Monica residents under SB326.

I attended law school at Yale and Stanford where we doggedly studied civil procedure. As you well know, due process rights are table stakes for any functioning government; an unflinching commitment thereto is how we maintain order and equality in any society.

In connection with St. Joseph Center's occupation of two sites on Ocean Avenue, the Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed; the due process rights owed to the residents of Santa Monica thereunder were violated, full stop.

I urge you to take immediate, remedial action and adhere to all legal requirements in connection with these openings, for the sake of your constituents.

Respectfully,
Ryan Smith
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1802 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 392
Mitchell Kois
From: Katherine Griffith <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 4:41 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16- Negrete

EXTERNAL
Hello,
I am writing to voice my objection to the 413/825 Ocean Ave housing project for the severely mentally ill that was pushed through without appropriate communication, community engagement, and considerations on the impact on area. Below is an email I sent to Supervisor Horvath summarizing the reasons for objection:
---
Dear Supervisor Horvath,
I am writing to voice my serious concern and frustration regarding how your office, alongside the Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health, has moved forward with the voluntary entry/exit facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue for the unhoused and those with severe mental illness, all without any prior community input or notice.

As highlighted by Santa Monica Mayor Lana Negrete in her October 9, 2025 memo to the City Manager, even our local government was caught off guard by these developments, only learning of them after funding was secured and renovations had begun. This left residents, including myself, stunned, piecing together the plan through whispers rather than official channels. This wasn’t a simple oversight—it was a significant lapse in openness.

The Mayor’s memo also points out that the County and its nonprofit collaborators failed to adhere to Welfare and Institutions Code §5604.2(a)(4), which mandates the inclusion of citizens and experts throughout the planning stages. This should involve input from locals, shop owners, educators, and those directly affected by these sites—yet none of us were consulted.

Rather than a transparent process, this initiative was pushed ahead quietly, ignoring the implications for nearby daycares, local schools, retirement homes, and the bustling tourist zone that drives so much of our city’s income, especially when we’re already facing budget challenges. This lack of openness has shaken my confidence and challenged the values of accessible governance you’ve long supported.

Your recent FAQ with St. Joseph Center tries to reassure us with promises of "24/7 staffing" and "improved security," but the October 9th Town Hall made it clear there’s no comprehensive safety strategy beyond the facility walls—a point raised by your office, LA County DMH, and St. Joseph’s representatives. Offering transparency only after the fact feels more like a cover-up than accountability.

Moreover, the City of Santa Monica’s Homelessness Strategic Plan, on page 5, lists transparency as a Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1803 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 393
core value, stating: "Transparent. We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to build community trust." It also aims to "enhance the wellbeing of all," a goal that seems overlooked given these actions.

Supervisor Horvath, my neighbors and I support mental health services and supportive housing, but we object to being excluded from decisions that so deeply impact our kids, seniors, local streets, classrooms, small businesses, safety, and financial health. I demand an explanation and insist on a halt to these facility openings until a thorough review is conducted publicly, in line with legal standards.

I urge you to suspend the launch of the mental health facilities at 413 Ocean Avenue and 825 Ocean Avenue, and initiate a detailed investigation into how these sites, vendors, and plans were approved, ensuring a complete reassessment with full disclosure and genuine public involvement.

Sincerely,
Katherine Griffith
[email protected]
129 Alta Ave, Santa Monica CA 90402
Katherine Griffith
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1804 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 394
Mitchell Kois
From: Kayla Carmichael <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 4:29 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16-Negrete

EXTERNAL
Kayla Carmichael
311 Ocean Ave
Santa Monica, CA 90402
310-751-4590
October 12, 2025
To Whom It May Concern,
I am writing not just as a Santa Monica resident, but as a parent, a neighbor, and someone who deeply loves this city — to express my strong opposition to the sudden and secretive approval of a 49-bed highacuity behavioral health facility at 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue.

This plan has blindsided our community. It was pushed through quietly, with no public notice, no hearing, and no opportunity for residents to voice our concerns. Many of us only learned about it after permits had already been issued and operations had begun. This kind of stealth process feels like a betrayal of public trust.

This facility is being placed directly next to Palisades Park — a space where children play, families walk together, seniors relax and socialize, and the community gathers to enjoy one of the most beautiful stretches of coastline in California. This is not an industrial block or a forgotten street. It’s the heart of our neighborhood. And now, we’re being told that a high-acuity facility for individuals with severe mental illness and drug addiction will open here, without any serious input from the people who live nearby.

Let me be clear: I support compassionate solutions to homelessness and mental health — but this is not the way to do it. Placing this kind of facility in one of the city's most densely visited, family-oriented, and unprotected public areas is not compassion. It’s carelessness.

We are already seeing the toll of the ongoing homelessness crisis in Santa Monica. Families avoid downtown. Children are no longer safe walking through areas that used to be vibrant and full of life. And now, this facility — described as serving "Santa Monicans" but in reality receiving high-acuity patients from all over Los Angeles County — is being quietly installed in our neighborhood without the necessary support systems in place to ensure safety and success for anyone involved.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1805 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 395
This isn’t just about property values. It’s about peace of mind. It’s about our kids walking to school. It’s about elderly neighbors who no longer feel safe visiting the park. It’s about maintaining a community we’ve all invested in with our time, energy, and yes, our tax dollars.

There is still time to reconsider this. I urge you — please — stop this project at its current location and involve the community in a transparent process to find a more appropriate site. We are not opposed to helping people. We are opposed to decisions that are made without us, behind closed doors, at the expense of our safety and our future.

We deserve better. Santa Monica deserves better.

Sincerely,
Kayla
Concerned Santa Monica Resident
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1806 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 396
Mitchell Kois
From: Ariel Barnhart <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 4:03 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Nicholas Barnhart
Subject: Item 16b-Support For Negrete

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
We are submiƫng our objecƟon to the homeless shelter slated to open at 413 ocean avenue for the severely mentally ill.

We have young children who aƩend school a thousand feet from the facility -- one of several schools (and preschools) in close walking distance.

As parents and consƟtuents, we urge you to support item 16B, and our Due Process rights under SB326.

Thank you,
Ariel and Nic Barnhart
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1807 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 397
Mitchell Kois
From: Alex S <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 4:02 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16-Negrete

EXTERNAL
Dear Council members,
I live in Santa Monica a block away from where the proposal is being made. I already am afraid of my safety due to the number of homeless in Santa Monica, now you like to burden me more with mentally ill people.

Please vote NO.

Thank you,
Soheil Alexander Soleimani
530 Georgina Ave.

S.M. Ca 90402
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1808 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 398
Mitchell Kois
From: R <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 3:59 PM
To: councilmtgitems; [email protected]
Cc: Bruce Goldsmith
Subject: Item 16-Negrete

EXTERNAL
I strongly Oppose this non-transparent process and LA County Supervisor Lindsay Horvath’s Plan to open a 49 Bed facility for the Severely Mentally Ill at 413 and 825 Ocean Ave .

Rumi Habuki
801 Ocean Ave #504 Santa Monica
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1809 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 399
Mitchell Kois
From: ci dixon <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 3:42 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16-Negrete - Pause 413 & 825 Ocean Ave Facilities Pending Transparent Review

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and Councilmembers,
I am submitting this comment for Item 16-Negrete. I support reopening analysis and request a pause on the 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue facilities until there is full transparency, proper zoning clarification, and a public process that includes residents, nearby schools, businesses, and public safety.

I am a Santa Monica resident and the mother of a disabled daughter who walks independently in our neighborhood. I support mental health care and housing, but this specific plan moved forward without adequate notice, medical licensing or staffing clarity, or a clear accountability framework. Calling this “supportive interim housing” while avoiding Title 22 licensing creates a safety and oversight gap that the City’s police, fire, and paramedics will be forced to fill at local expense.

Key concerns:
 Process and transparency - the City was “recently made aware” after funding and renovations were underway, undermining public trust.
 Zoning and legal clarity - if this is truly medical, it should be licensed and regulated; if it is housing, it should meet applicable housing and conditional use standards.
 Clinical safety - 24/7 security is not clinical care. No RN or psychiatrist on site means crises default to 911.  City costs and liability - emergency response, ER transports, and potential claims will land on Santa Monica taxpayers.
 Ownership and maintenance - the landlord remains responsible for habitability, pests, plumbing, and repairs, and his record raises concerns.

I respectfully ask Council to:

1. Support Item 16-Negrete and request a pause on occupancy.

2. Direct staff to obtain and publish the County DMH contract, staffing plan, and any licensing determinations.

3. Require a public meeting with detailed staffing credentials, incident reporting, and resident screening criteria.

4. Clarify zoning status and whether this use constitutes a change of use.

5. Publish a plan for neighborhood safety, costs, and accountability across agencies.

Thank you for protecting both vulnerable residents who deserve real care and the surrounding community that deserves a transparent, lawful process.

Sincerely,
Caroline Dixon
229 4th Street, 90402
[email protected]
(310) 498-6764
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1810 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 400
Mitchell Kois
From: Jessica M <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 3:38 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Voluntary Entry/Exit Facilities for the Severely Mentally Ill at 413/825 Ocean Ave

EXTERNAL
Dear Members of the City Council,
I am writing as a concerned resident to request that each Councilmember publicly disclose their knowledge of and involvement in the County-funded projects at 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue—including any communications, meetings, or briefings related to the facilities for the unhoused and severely mentally ill.

As outlined in Mayor Negrete’s October 9, 2025 memo, even City leadership was “recently made aware” of the County’s actions only after funding was approved and renovations were already underway. This revelation raises serious concerns about the breakdown of transparency and intergovernmental communication that has left both residents and local officials in the dark.

Given the proximity of these sites to preschools, elementary schools, senior living facilities, and Santa Monica’s key tourism and business corridor, the community has a right to know:
When did each Councilmember first learn of these projects? What information was provided, by whom, and when?
Were any City departments consulted prior to the County’s approval or the commencement of construction?
Why was this site selected, and what alternative analyses were conducted to ensure the highest and best use of taxpayer funds?
What actions, if any, has the City taken to ensure that proper community engagement— required under Welfare and Institutions Code §5604.2(a)(4)—was conducted before these facilities moved forward?
Transparency after decisions are made is not true transparency. The residents of Santa Monica deserve open dialogue, accountability, and proactive disclosure—not a retroactive explanation for actions that affect public safety, local schools, and the city’s economic stability.

More specifically, on page 5 of the City of Santa Monica’s Homelessness Strategic Plan one of the first stated values of the plan is to be transparent. I quote: “Transparent. We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1811 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 401
trust of our community.” The mission statement of the strategic plan also claims to “promote the wellbeing of all”, but that clearly was not followed in the case of 413/825 Ocean Avenue.

I respectfully urge the Council to work with the County and the Department of Mental Health to delay the opening of these facilities and require a full public accounting from all City departments and elected officials with any knowledge or involvement in these projects to restore trust. Residents across our city deserve transparency on how such future projects will be evaluated and how the community can be a partner along the way – especially as full implementation of the Mental Health Services Act will be in effect starting in July of 2026.

Thank you for your attention to this urgent matter.

Sincerely,
Jessica Munoz
Santa Monica
[email protected]

Sent from my iPhone
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1812 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 402
Mitchell Kois
From: Mercy Valdes <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 3:27 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: "Item 16-Negrete"

EXTERNAL
I want to formally submit my objection to the Saint Joseph's Severe Mental Health housing being opened at 413 and 825 Ocean Ave into the public record in advance of Tuesday’s City of Santa Monica Council. I will not be speaking just emailing about my objection to be added as a name objecting this project. Zip code 90402.

Thanks!
Mercy
--------
Mercy Valdes
305-336-2497
[email protected]
linkedin.com/in/mercyvaldes
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1813 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 403
Mitchell Kois
From: Walter Parkes <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 3:14 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: 16-B

EXTERNAL
While we support finding soluƟons to accommodate homeless mentally ill paƟents in Santa Moncia, I strongly you oppose this non-transparent process and LA County Supervisor Lindsay Horvath’s Plan to open a 49-bed facility with voluntary entry/exit for the severely mentally ill at 413 and 825 Ocean Ave, and support the Mayor’s outlined acƟons in the Item 16-B memo.

Walter Parkes
Laurie MacDonald
300 Georgina Avenue
Santa Monica, California.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1814 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 404
Mitchell Kois
From: Mahtab Partovi <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 3:05 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: No to mental illness housing on ocean Ave

EXTERNAL
I have lived in Santa monica for 45 years and over the year the crime and homelessness has gotten out of control.

My once safe beachside neighborhood is a disgrace and dangerous.

I walk 6mo old child that I walk on ocean Ave everyday from ocean towers where we live to Montana and back. We pass the proposed mental institution twice a day.

The thought of allowing mentally unstable people to be able to come and go as they please on the most expensive street in the country is absurd.

Please do not allow this to happen to our beautiful Santa Monica.

The vengeful real estate developer who was kicked off the city council needs to be stopped.

Mahtab Partovi DDS
Orthodontist
360orthodontics.com
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1815 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 405
Mitchell Kois
From: Nancy Peters <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 3:04 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: 413/825 Ocean Ave - Request to delay opening

EXTERNAL
October 12, 2025

The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401

[Sent via email: [email protected]; [email protected]] RE:Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Shelters for the Severely Mentally Ill at 413/825 Ocean Ave

Dear Mayor Negrete, City Manager Chi, and Honorable Members of the City Council, I want to express my strong opposition to the process in which approvals and funding were secured for two mental health facilities which require no background checks or sobriety requirements, per a statement made by the LA County Department of Mental Health during a community town hall conducted on Thursday, October 9th. As such, I also write to express my strong support for Mayor Lana Negrete’s leadership and her recent memo requesting transparency, community engagement, and accountability regarding the facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue. [Add personal information about why this is relevant to you – kids in school, business impacts, lived experience] While our community cares deeply about helping those struggling with mental illness and homelessness, these projects are located in areas surrounded by senior facilities, preschools, and elementary schools—all within a half-mile radius. This makes it especially important that decisions like this are made with full public input, clear information, and thoughtful consideration of available citywide resources (e.g., law enforcement), neighborhood safety, and tourism impacts particularly as our city is under significant financial stress.

We must follow the transparency, community-centric measures outlined in the City of Santa Monica’s Homelessness Strategic Plan, where one of the first stated values of the plan is to be transparent. To expand, the documents states the goal of the effort is to be: “Transparent… We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community.” The mission statement of the strategic plan also claims to “promote the wellbeing of all”, but that clearly was not followed in the case of 413/825 Ocean Avenue.

Thank you for your service to our city and for considering this important item.

Sincerely,
Nancy Peters
240 Alta Ave
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1816 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 406
Mitchell Kois
From: Alex Egan Ramanathan <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 2:59 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Council Mailbox
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Request to delay opening of proposed mental health facilities with Voluntary Entry / Exit Procedures at 413/825 Ocean Ave Per Item 16-B

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete, City Manager Chi, and Honorable Members of the City Council,

I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

The first public discussion on this topic took place Thursday, October 9th during a NOMA informational zoom meeting. However, it was clear the intention of St. Joseph’s and LA County was to open the facility illegally and without notice or community input. More so, fully formed operational polices or adequate safety measures to protect the surrounding neighborhood were not and have not been presented or accepted.

Furthermore, I am concerned to have learned from St. Joseph’s that individuals in this shelter will not be subject to drug testing or complete background checks, yet they will be permitted to exit and enter the facility and community freely during the day. This poses significant risks to our community, especially given the proximity of schools, community parks and local residents. Additionally, it was suggested that others looking for homeless services would benefit from outreach being conducted in the surrounding area, effectively putting more homeless, mentally ill and drug addicts in the neighborhood. You are not simply housing 49 people; you are a beacon to everyone looking for homeless services.

Personally, I would like to highlight that the elementary school my children attend, Carlthorp School, is located just 0.3 miles from the planned shelter location. In addition to Carlthorp, there are multiple other preschools and elementary schools in close proximity, educating thousands of elementary-aged students. The potential impact on the safety and well-being of these children and staff members cannot be overstated. It is illegal for anyone on the sex registry to live within a mile of a school and yet you will be placing nearly 50 seriously mentally ill individuals less than 1/3 of a mile from our school and your suggested background check process is not measurable or complete.

It is clear your security plan beyond the shelter is inadequate. The reputation of your owner and “partner” in this facility was highlighted in this LA Times article from last year and details serious safety concerns surrounding another one his projects: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.latimes.com/homelesshousing/story/2024-11-05/new-owner-cuts-security-janitors-at-skid-row-homeless-housing-as-tenants-fearworseningItem 16-B October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1817 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 407
conditions__;!!AbgBjg!zXkFh5Sm194ZEbXoeAu3BO0oTRYHmO0s51FELOHdXKrFBOuOI_vCwcwtmap0JR1d cmTDv04Gf7mwZlTx-RMz$

Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who attend the impacted schools.

Protect our children, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Alex Ramanathan
1014 Amherst Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90049
Carlthorp School Parent
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1818 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 408
Mitchell Kois
From: Mimi Lee Chen <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 2:53 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: RE: Item 16B Support for Negrete

EXTERNAL
Dear Coucilmembers,
I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

The first public discussion on this topic took place Thursday, October 9th during a NOMA informational zoom meeting. However, it was clear the intention of St. Joseph’s and LA County was to open the facility illegally and without notice or community input. More so, fully formed operational polices or adequate safety measures to protect the surrounding neighborhood were not and have not been presented or accepted.

Furthermore, I am concerned to have learned from St. Joseph’s that individuals in this shelter will not be subject to drug testing or complete background checks, yet they will be permitted to exit and and enter the facility and community freely during the day. This poses significant risks to our community, especially given the proximity of schools, community parks and local residents. Additionally, it was suggested that others looking for homeless services would benefit from outreach being conducted in the surrounding area, effectively putting more homeless, mentally ill and drug addicts in the neighborhood. You are not simply housing 49 people you are a beacon to everyone looking for homeless services.

Personally, I would like to highlight that the preschool school my children attend, First Presbyterian Nursery School, is located just 0.5 miles from the planned shelter location. In addition to First Pres, multiple other preschools and elementary schools in close proximity, educating thousands of elementary-aged students. The potential impact on the safety and well-being of these children and staff members cannot be overstated. It is illegal for anyone on the sex registry to live within a mile of a school and your suggested background check process is not measurable or complete.

It is clear your security plan beyond the shelter is not complete or adequate. The reputation of your Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1819 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 409
owner and “partner” in this facility was highlighted in this LA Times article from last year and details serious safety concerns surrounding another one his projects: https://www.latimes.com/homelesshousing/story/2024-11-05/new-owner-cuts-security-janitors-at-skid-row-homeless-housing-as-tenantsfear-worsening-conditions Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who attend the impacted schools.

Protect our children, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Mimi Chen
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1820 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 410
Mitchell Kois
From: MICHAEL A. BELGRAVE <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 2:38 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Home
Subject: Re:nItem 16B-NEGRETE Locations for mental ill on Ocean Ave.

EXTERNAL
To:

The Santa Monica City Council Members,
I wish to be place on record expressing my opposiƟon and disappointment to ITEM 16-B NEGRETE being force on us the residents of Santa Monica, we had no hearings to discuss or vent our concerns on this maƩer thats being force upon us.

The process on how these two properƟes were green light for the use oh housing MENTALlY ILL was not a transparent one, we deserved beƩer.

The open door policy proposed for these two faciliƟes located at 413 and 825 Ocean Ave, having the MENTALLY ILL going in and out was tried by this same organizaƟon and failed miserably.

I’v lived in this City Santa Monica, and as a resident we need and deserve beƩer. We already have plenty of mentally ill and homeless about, around and in our parks and neighborhoods, families, elderly in wheelchairs, kids people walking their dogs use the park daily and my now have to contend with these two faciliƟes.

As our elected representaƟves, please use your office and all tool available to you to stop this catastrophe from happening.

Many Thanks,
Michael A Belgrave

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1821 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 411
Mitchell Kois
From: Nick Hedges <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 2:10 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16- Negrete

EXTERNAL
Regarding 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue.

I am a resident of North of Montana, living at Euclid and Georgina. I also own a property at the 500 block of San Vincente where my elderly relaƟves live and have a child at Carlthorp School. As such I am a long Ɵme resident and tax payer in Santa Monica (20 years).

I implore the council to do everything in their power to follow due legal process in the planned locaƟon of this Class 3 mental health facility. In my opinion this is a very poor locaƟon for such a facility with close proximity to various vulnerable community members such as children, women and the elderly who use Palisades Park and aƩend close by schools.

The nature of the facility is such that potenƟally dangerous individuals will be housed and free to exit and mingle with the community at will between 7am-9pm every day. I do not believe Santa Monica has the necessary resources to ensure that this is safe for the community.

Due legal process has not been followed and I strongly believe that Senate Bill 326 “The Good Neighbor Policy” has been violated. I stand with thousands of other community members ready to resource and fight this in the courts. This will be extremely expensive for the City of Santa Monica and enƟrely unnecessary.

Sincerely,
Nick Hedges
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1822 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 412
Mitchell Kois
From: Fernanda London <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 2:04 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Delay Opening of Proposed Mental Health Facilities with Voluntary Entry/Exit Procedures at 413/825 Ocean Ave Per Item 16-B

Joseph’s Center, was brought forward to the County when a private developer who is currently suing the City of Santa Monica, sought out the County and St. Joseph’s to provide taxpayer support to subsidize his property at 413 Ocean Avenue and 825 Ocean Avenue.

As such, we want to record our opposition to this project and provide full support for Item 16-B on the October 14, 2025 City Council agenda, corresponding to Mayor Negrete’s October 9, 2025 memorandum titled “Request for City Council Direction on Community Engagement, Zoning Clarity, and Accountability for LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects.” This proposal offers a thoughtful and balanced framework that promotes compassion and transparency while ensuring accountability, public safety, and community trust for the entire population of Santa Monica. While this project is specific to the community near Palisades Park, every single community in Santa Monica deserves notification and public input in any projects that affect their community, writ large. While it is this community today, it can be any community tomorrow.

We request the City and County work together to request a delay of the project at 413/825 Ocean Ave. until all of the items in 16-B have been discussed in public hearings and a new analysis explaining the rationale behind this project, the alternative sites that were considered, and if the County made a decision that is in compliance with the needs defined by the City and its residents.

Specifically, as it relates to Item 16-B:

1. Comprehensive Outreach and Communication
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1823 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 413
We strongly support Direction #1, which calls for coordination between the City, LA County Department of Mental Health (DMH), St. Joseph Center, and the project developer to ensure robust outreach to residents and nearby businesses—including the numerous schools, hotels, small businesses, and other stakeholders along Ocean Avenue and its surrounding radius. Residents and local business owners deserve timely notice and a chance to understand project goals, operations, and impacts. Transparent engagement fosters cooperation rather than conflict and ensures that city decisions reflect both compassion and local input.

This is fidelity to the law and the spirit of partnership that newly passed state requires.

The Mayor’s proposed public communications strategy—including a dedicated FAQ webpage, hotline for concerns, and clear follow-up protocols—is precisely the kind of accessible, factbased communication the community needs. The fact that no one has yet been able to access any public documentation regarding the process and application in which these facilities were approved and funded with taxpayer funds speaks to the lack of transparency the law requires.

5. Verification of Developer Qualifications and Financial Transparency Direction #5’s call for verification of the developer’s goals, operational record, legal standing, and compensation from LA County is essential for accountability. Residents have a right to know who is behind these projects, how public funds are being used, and whether any conflicts of interest or active litigation exist. This transparency builds confidence in both the City’s and County’s stewardship of public resources, and that site selection is driven by thoughtful due diligence, published documentation, and needs analyses that demonstrate funding needs are matched to the highest and best use, instead of driven by calls from developers who are seeking subsidized operations while they seek entitlements.

6. Retrospective Review and Corrective Action
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1824 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 414
Direction #6 ensures that the entire City of Santa Monica benefits from a thoughtful approach to compassionate care. We must learn from past experience by reviewing similar projects in Sunset Park and the Pico Neighborhood. If community engagement was inadequate in earlier projects, the City should take corrective steps now—establishing consistent contact systems, feedback channels, and neighborhood support mechanisms. This proactive stance prevents repeated errors and strengthens long-term public trust. Given the City’s financial challenges with cut services, particularly in public safety, we must provide support to all affected services across the City that no department is overly burdened by County-driven decisions that silence City taxpayers.

In addition, on page 5 of the City of Santa Monica’sHomelessness Strategic Plan one of the first stated values of the plan is to be transparent. I quote: “Transparent. We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community.” The mission statement of the strategic plan also claims to “promote the wellbeing of all”, but that clearly was not followed in the case of 413/825 Ocean Avenue.

Sincerely,
Fernanda London, MPA
12 year resident home on 23d and Georgina
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1825 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 415
Mitchell Kois
From: Fernanda London <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 2:00 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16B Support for Negrete

EXTERNAL
To:
[email protected]
[email protected]
Dear Coucilmembers,
I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

The first public discussion on this topic took place Thursday, October 9th during a NOMA informational zoom meeting. However, it was clear the intention of St. Joseph’s and LA County was to open the facility illegally and without notice or community input. More so, fully formed operational polices or adequate safety measures to protect the surrounding neighborhood were not and have not been presented or accepted.

Furthermore, I am concerned to have learned from St. Joseph’s that individuals in this shelter will not be subject to drug testing or complete background checks, yet they will be permitted to exit and and enter the facility and community freely during the day. This poses significant risks to our community, especially given the proximity of schools, community parks and local residents. Additionally, it was suggested that others looking for homeless services would benefit from outreach being conducted in the surrounding area, effectively putting more homeless, mentally ill and drug addicts in the neighborhood. You are not simply housing 49 people you are a beacon to everyone looking for homeless services.

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1826 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 416
be overstated. It is illegal for anyone on the sex registry to live within a mile of a school and your suggested background check process is not measurable or complete.

It is clear your security plan beyond the shelter is not complete or adequate. The reputation of your owner and “partner” in this facility was highlighted in this LA Times article from last year and details serious safety concerns surrounding another one his projects: https://www.latimes.com/homelesshousing/story/2024-11-05/new-owner-cuts-security-janitors-at-skid-row-homeless-housing-as-tenantsfear-worsening-conditions Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who attend the impacted schools.

Protect our children, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Fernanda London
Fernanda London, MPA
COO
L&L Insurance Agency
11933 Wilshire Blvd.

Los Angeles, CA 90025
T 310.473.7368
F 310.996.0227
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1827 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 417
Mitchell Kois
From: Julia Noik <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 1:47 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; [email protected] Cc: Craig Noik
Subject: Support for Negrete-16b
Attachments: The Honorable Lindsey P. Horvath.docx; The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council.docx

EXTERNAL
10/12/2025
The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
[Sent via email: [email protected]; [email protected]] RE:Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Shelters for the Severely Mentally Ill at 413/825 Ocean Ave Dear Mayor Negrete, City Manager Chi, and Honorable Members of the City Council, I want to express my strong opposition to the process in which approvals and funding were secured for two mental health facilities which require no background checks or sobriety requirements, per a statement made by the LA County Department of Mental Health during a community town hall conducted on Thursday, October 9th. As such, I also write to express my strong support for Mayor Lana Negrete’s leadership and her recent memo requesting transparency, community engagement, and accountability regarding the facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue. [Add personal information about why this is relevant to you – kids in school, business impacts, lived experience] While our community cares deeply about helping those struggling with mental illness and homelessness, these projects are located in areas surrounded by senior facilities, preschools, and elementary schools—all within a half-mile radius. This makes it especially important that decisions like this are made with full public input, clear information, and thoughtful consideration of available citywide resources (e.g., law enforcement), neighborhood safety, and tourism impacts particularly as our city is under significant financial stress.

We must follow the transparency, community-centric measures outlined in the City of Santa Monica’s Homelessness Strategic Plan, where one of the first stated values of the plan is to be transparent. To expand, the documents states the goal of the effort is to be: “Transparent… We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community.” The mission statement of the strategic plan also claims to “promote the wellbeing of all”, but that clearly was not followed in the case of 413/825 Ocean Avenue.

Thank you for your service to our city and for considering this important item.

Sincerely,
Julia Noik
218 Alta Ave, Santa Monica, CA 90402
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1828 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 418
10/12/2025
The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
[Sent via email: [email protected]; [email protected]] RE:Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Shelters for the Severely Mentally Ill at 413/825 Ocean Ave Dear Mayor Negrete, City Manager Chi, and Honorable Members of the City Council, I want to express my strong opposition to the process in which approvals and funding were secured for two mental health facilities which require no background checks or sobriety requirements, per a statement made by the LA County Department of Mental Health during a community town hall conducted on Thursday, October 9th. As such, I also write to express my strong support for Mayor Lana Negrete’s leadership and her recent memo requesting transparency, community engagement, and accountability regarding the facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue. [Add personal information about why this is relevant to you – kids in school, business impacts, lived experience] While our community cares deeply about helping those struggling with mental illness and homelessness, these projects are located in areas surrounded by senior facilities, preschools, and elementary schools—all within a half-mile radius. This makes it especially important that decisions like this are made with full public input, clear information, and thoughtful consideration of available citywide resources (e.g., law enforcement), neighborhood safety, and tourism impacts particularly as our city is under significant financial stress.

We must follow the transparency, community-centric measures outlined in the City of Santa Monica’s Homelessness Strategic Plan, where one of the first stated values of the plan is to be transparent. To expand, the documents states the goal of the effort is to be: “Transparent… We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community.” The mission statement of the strategic plan also claims to “promote the wellbeing of all”, but that clearly was not followed in the case of 413/825 Ocean Avenue.

Thank you for your service to our city and for considering this important item.

Sincerely,
Julia Noik
218 Alta Ave, Santa Monica, CA 90402
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1829 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 10/12/2025
The Honorable Lindsey P. Horvath
Los Angeles County Supervisor, Third District
500 West Temple Street, Room 866
Los Angeles, CA 90012
[Sent via email: [email protected]]
Re: Lack of Transparency and Community Engagement Regarding 413 & 825 Ocean Avenue Mental Health Facilities
Dear Supervisor Horvath,
I am writing to express my deep concern and disappointment over the manner in which your office and the Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health advanced the voluntary entry/exit facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue for the unhoused and severely mentally ill without prior public notice or community engagement.

Residents were blindsided, left to discover this project through rumor rather than proper notification. This was not a clerical error—it was a profound failure of transparency.

In addition, on page 5 of the City of Santa Monica’s Homelessness Strategic Plan one of the first stated values of the plan is to be transparent. I quote: “Transparent. We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community.” The mission statement of the strategic plan also claims to “promote the wellbeing of all”, but that clearly was not followed as we have outlined.

Supervisor Horvath, the people of Santa Monica are not opposed to providing mental health care or supportive housing. We are opposed to being cut out of decisions that so profoundly affect our children, elderly, neighborhoods, schools, small businesses, safety, and economic stability. You owe this community an explanation and must put a pause to the opening of these facilities until proper due diligence is completed in a public forum that is in compliance with the law.

Sincerely,
Julia Noik
218 Alta Ave, Santa Monica
[Optional: Email / Phone]
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1830 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 10/12/2025
The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
[Sent via email: [email protected]; [email protected]] RE:Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Shelters for the Severely Mentally Ill at 413/825 Ocean Ave
Dear Mayor Negrete, City Manager Chi, and Honorable Members of the City Council, I want to express my strong opposition to the process in which approvals and funding were secured for two mental health facilities which require no background checks or sobriety requirements, per a statement made by the LA County Department of Mental Health during a community town hall conducted on Thursday, October 9th. As such, I also write to express my strong support for Mayor Lana Negrete’s leadership and her recent memo requesting transparency, community engagement, and accountability regarding the facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue.
[Add personal information about why this is relevant to you – kids in school, business impacts, lived experience] While our community cares deeply about helping those struggling with mental illness and homelessness, these projects are located in areas surrounded by senior facilities, preschools, and elementary schools—all within a half-mile radius. This makes it especially important that decisions like this are made with full public input, clear information, and thoughtful consideration of available citywide resources (e.g., law enforcement), neighborhood safety, and tourism impacts particularly as our city is under significant financial stress.

We must follow the transparency, community-centric measures outlined in the City of Santa Monica’s Homelessness Strategic Plan, where one of the first stated values of the plan is to be transparent. To expand, the documents states the goal of the effort is to be: “Transparent… We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community.” The mission statement of the strategic plan also claims to “promote the wellbeing of all”, but that clearly was not followed in the case of 413/825 Ocean Avenue.

Thank you for your service to our city and for considering this important item.

Sincerely,
Julia Noik
218 Alta Ave, Santa Monica, CA 90402
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1831 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 419
Mitchell Kois
From: David Skinner <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 1:44 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16B-Negrete

EXTERNAL
To whom it may concern:

I am writing to oppose the non-transparent process, and LA County Supervisor Lindsay Horvath’s plan, to open a 49 Bed facility for the Severely Mentally Ill at 413 and 825 Ocean Ave.

As a ten year resident of Brentwood who has raised my family here, I know this neighborhood well and use the park regularly. While I respect and support the need to house our mentally ill, doing so in an ocean front area with significant and near continuous public usage seems like a poor decision. It seems it would create unnecessary risk for the public and patients to creat housing in an area with such continuous pedestrian usage. And it seems unjust to taxpayers to make this decision without input or consideration from local individuals who will be affected by the change.

A discussion with local representation seems like a reasonable next step. I appreciate you taking this into consideration.

David Skinner
3424 Mandeville Canyon Rd, Los Angeles, CA 90049
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1832 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 420
Mitchell Kois
From: G. William Birrell <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 1:39 PM
To: [email protected]; councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Delay Opening of Proposed Mental Health Facilities

EXTERNAL
10 October 2025
The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
[Sent via email: [email protected]; [email protected]] RE: Request to Delay Opening of Proposed Mental Health Facilities with Voluntary Entry/Exit Procedures at 413/825 Ocean Ave Per Item 16-B
Dear Mayor Negrete, City Manager Chi, and Honorable Members of the City Council, I am writing as a Santa Monica resident to express my concerns about the secretive negotiations between unnamed City Council Members, the City’s Housing and Human Services Department (HHS), the County Department of Mental Health (DMH) to fund – with taxpayer money – a 49-bed facility for the unhoused and several mentally ill. This project, according to the CEO of St. Joseph’s Center, was brought forward to the County only once a private developer who is currently suing the City of Santa Monica, sought out the County and St. Joseph’s to offer up his sites at 413 Ocean Avenue and 825 Ocean Avenue.

While this project is specific to the community near Palisades Park, every single community in Santa Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1833 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 421
Monica deserves notification and public input in any projects that affect their community, writ large.

While it is this community today, it can be any community tomorrow.

We request the City and County work together to request a delay of the project at 413/825 Ocean Ave. until all of the items in 16-B have been discussed in public hearings and a new analysis explaining the rationale behind this project, the alternative sites that were considered, and if the County made a decision that is in compliance with the needs defined by the City and its residents.

Specifically, as it relates to Item 16-B:

Transparent engagement fosters cooperation rather than conflict and ensures that city decisions reflect both compassion and local input.

5. Verification of Developer Qualifications and Financial Transparency Direction #5’s call for verification of the developer’s goals, operational record, legal standing, and compensation from LA County is essential for accountability. Residents have a right to know who is behind these projects, how public funds are being used, and whether any conflicts of interest or active litigation exist. This transparency builds confidence in both the City’s and County’s stewardship of public resources, and that site selection is driven by thoughtful due diligence, published documentation, and Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1834 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 422
needs analyses that demonstrate funding needs are matched to the highest and best use, instead of driven by calls from developers who are seeking subsidized operations while they seek entitlements.

In addition, on page 5 of the City of Santa Monica’s Homelessness Strategic Plan one of the first stated values of the plan is to be transparent. I quote: “Transparent. We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community.” The mission statement of the strategic plan also claims to “promote the wellbeing of all”, but that clearly was not followed in the case of 413/825 Ocean Avenue.

Sincerely,
G. William Birrell
144 Alta Ave.

Santa Monica, CA 90402
[email protected]
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1835 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 423
Mitchell Kois
From: Susan La Bassiere <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 1:37 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: ITEM 16B-NEGRETE

EXTERNAL
To the Santa Monica City Council Members,
I wish to put on record my opposiƟon firstly to a completely non-transparent process and secondly to Supervisor Lindsay Horvath’s plan, to establish 2 open-door faciliƟes for the SEVERELY MENTALLY ILL at 413 and 825 Ocean Ave.

As a resident of Santa Monica for over twenty years, I believe that this city deserves much beƩer-planned and wellthought out soluƟons to the issues of mental illness and homelessness, rather than placing two residenƟal faciliƟes in an area across the street from a park that is used by families and individuals all day and evening. Frankly there are already enough issues with mentally ill individuals in the park, without addiƟonal similar people living right there.

Please do something to stop this “secret” plan.

Thank you.

Patricia S. La Bassiere
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1836 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 424
Mitchell Kois
From: Jason Kakoyiannis <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 12:59 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16B - Negrete

EXTERNAL
I strongly oppose this non-transparent process and LA County Supervisor Lindsay Horvath’s Plan to open a 49 Bed facility for the Severely Mentally Ill at 413 and 825 Ocean Ave.

Respectfully,
Jason Kakoyiannis
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1837 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 425
Mitchell Kois
From: Aleese Orr <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 12:35 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: 413/825 Ocean Ave - Request to Delay Opening

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1838 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 426
We request the City and County work together to request a delay of the project at 413/825 Ocean Ave. until all of the items in 16-B have been discussed in public hearings and a new analysis explaining the rationale behind this project, the alternative sites that were considered, and if the County made a decision that is in compliance with the needs defined by the City and its residents.

Specifically, as it relates to Item 16-B:

1. Comprehensive Outreach and Communication
We strongly support Direction #1, which calls for coordination between the City, LA County Department of Mental Health (DMH), St. Joseph Center, and the project developer to ensure robust outreach to residents and nearby businesses— including the numerous schools, hotels, small businesses, and other stakeholders along Ocean Avenue and its surrounding radius. Residents and local business owners deserve timely notice and a chance to understand project goals, operations, and impacts. Transparent engagement fosters cooperation rather than conflict and ensures that city decisions reflect both compassion and local input.

Every Santa Monican deserves to understand what are allowable uses for the buildings in their communities, particularly around communities that serve children and seniors.

4. Public Explanation of Land Use and Operational Standards Direction #4 calls for a clear public explanation of the legal basis that allows these facilities to operate without a discretionary City permit. Residents must understand the distinctions between a mental health facility, a transitional housing facility, an emergency shelter, and supportive housing—and how each is governed under City and State law. The Mayor’s proposed public communications strategy—including a dedicated FAQ webpage, hotline for concerns, and clear follow-up protocols— is precisely the kind of accessible, fact-based communication the community needs. The fact that no one has yet been able to access any public documentation regarding the process and application in which these facilities were approved and funded with taxpayer funds speaks to the lack of transparency the law requires.

5. Verification of Developer Qualifications and Financial Transparency Direction #5’s call for verification of the developer’s goals, operational record, legal standing, and compensation from LA County is essential for accountability. Residents have a right to know who is behind these projects, how public funds are being used, and whether any conflicts of interest or active litigation exist. This transparency builds confidence in both the City’s and County’s stewardship of public resources, and that site selection is driven by thoughtful due diligence, published documentation, and needs analyses that demonstrate funding needs are matched to the highest and best use, instead of driven by calls from developers who are seeking subsidized operations while they seek entitlements.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1839 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 427
Conclusion
The Mayor’s memo provides a clear roadmap toward a balanced approach—one that supports mental health initiatives while demanding accountability, transparency, and respect for Santa Monica residents. I respectfully urge the City Council to adopt all six directives in full and to hold LA County and its nonprofit partners to the highest standards of openness, compliance, and community collaboration.

In addition, on page 5 of the City of Santa Monica’s Homelessness Strategic Plan one of the first stated values of the plan is to be transparent. I quote: “Transparent. We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community.” The mission statement of the strategic plan also claims to “promote the wellbeing of all”, but that clearly was not followed in the case of 413/825 Ocean Avenue.

Sincerely,
Aleese Orr
308 Alta Ave, Santa Monica
[email protected]
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1840 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 428
Mitchell Kois
From: Shannon Rugani <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 11:52 AM
To: Council Mailbox
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16-Negrete

EXTERNAL
10/12/2025

The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401

[Sent via email: [email protected]; [email protected]]

RE:Request to Delay Opening of Proposed Mental Health Facilities with Voluntary Entry/ExitProcedures at 413/825 Ocean Ave Per Item 16-B

As such, we want to record our opposition to this project and provide full support for Item 16-B on the October 14, 2025 City Council agenda, corresponding to Mayor Negrete’s October 9, 2025 memorandum titled “Request for City Council Direction on Community Engagement, Zoning Clarity, and Accountability for LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects.” This proposal offers a thoughtful and balanced framework that promotes compassion and transparency while ensuring accountability, public safety, and community trust for the entire population of Santa Monica. While this project is specific to the community near Palisades Park, Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1841 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 429
every single community in Santa Monica deserves notification and public input in any projects that affect their community, writ large. While it is this community today, it can be any community tomorrow.

We request the City and County work together to request a delay of the project at 413/825 Ocean Ave. until all of the items in 16-B have been discussed in public hearings and a new analysis explaining the rationale behind this project, the alternative sites that were considered, and if the County made a decision that is in compliance with the needs defined by the City and its residents.

Specifically, as it relates to Item 16-B:

This is fidelity to the law and the spirit of partnership that newly passed state requires.

The Mayor’s proposed public communications strategy—including a dedicated FAQ webpage, hotline for concerns, and clear follow-up protocols—is precisely the kind of accessible, factbased communication the community needs. The fact that no one has yet been able to access any public documentation regarding the process and application in which these facilities were approved and funded with taxpayer funds speaks to the lack of transparency the law requires.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1842 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 430

5. Verification of Developer Qualifications and Financial Transparency Direction #5’s call for verification of the developer’s goals, operational record, legal standing, and compensation from LA County is essential for accountability. Residents have a right to know who is behind these projects, how public funds are being used, and whether any conflicts of interest or active litigation exist. This transparency builds confidence in both the City’s and County’s stewardship of public resources, and that site selection is driven by thoughtful due diligence, published documentation, and needs analyses that demonstrate funding needs are matched to the highest and best use, instead of driven by calls from developers who are seeking subsidized operations while they seek entitlements.

In addition, on page 5 of the City of Santa Monica’sHomelessness Strategic Plan one of the first stated values of the plan is to be transparent. I quote: “Transparent. We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community.” The mission statement of the strategic plan also claims to “promote the wellbeing of all”, but that clearly was not followed in the case of 413/825 Ocean Avenue.

Sincerely,
Shannon Rugani
201 Ocean Ave Santa Monica CA 90402
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1843 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 431
Mitchell Kois
From: Sarah Miriam Bederman <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 11:57 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Re: Request to Delay Opening of Proposed Mental Health Facilities with Voluntary Entry/Exit Procedures at 413/825 Ocean Ave Per Item 16-B

We request the City and County work together to request a delay of the project at 413/825 Ocean Ave. until all of the items in 16-B have been discussed in public hearings and a new analysis explaining the rationale behind this project, the alternative sites that were considered, and if the County made a decision that is in compliance with the needs defined by the City and its residents.

Specifically, as it relates to Item 16-B:

1. Comprehensive Outreach and Communication
We strongly support Direction #1, which calls for coordination between the City, LA County Department of Mental Health (DMH), St. Joseph Center, and the project developer to ensure robust outreach to residents and nearby businesses— including the numerous schools, hotels, small businesses, and other stakeholders along Ocean Avenue and its surrounding radius. Residents and local business owners deserve timely notice and a chance to understand project goals, operations, and impacts. Transparent engagement fosters cooperation rather than conflict and ensures that city decisions reflect both compassion and local input.

2. Compliance with Proposition 1 and the Good Neighbor Policy Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1844 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 432
Direction #2 correctly emphasizes compliance with all state laws. These laws explicitly require citizen and professional involvement at all stages of the planning process (Welfare & Institutions Code §5604.2(a)(4)). Enforcing these mandates ensures that mental health projects are developed with appropriate compassion for affected communities with input from residents, law enforcement, educators, housing experts, business owners, and those with lived experience. This is fidelity to the law and the spirit of partnership that newly passed state requires.

Every Santa Monican deserves to understand what are allowable uses for the buildings in their communities, particularly around communities that serve children and seniors.

4. Public Explanation of Land Use and Operational Standards Direction #4 calls for a clear public explanation of the legal basis that allows these facilities to operate without a discretionary City permit. Residents must understand the distinctions between a mental health facility, a transitional housing facility, an emergency shelter, and supportive housing—and how each is governed under City and State law. The Mayor’s proposed public communications strategy—including a dedicated FAQ webpage, hotline for concerns, and clear follow-up protocols— is precisely the kind of accessible, fact-based communication the community needs. The fact that no one has yet been able to access any public documentation regarding the process and application in which these facilities were approved and funded with taxpayer funds speaks to the lack of transparency the law requires.

5. Verification of Developer Qualifications and Financial Transparency Direction #5’s call for verification of the developer’s goals, operational record, legal standing, and compensation from LA County is essential for accountability. Residents have a right to know who is behind these projects, how public funds are being used, and whether any conflicts of interest or active litigation exist. This transparency builds confidence in both the City’s and County’s stewardship of public resources, and that site selection is driven by thoughtful due diligence, published documentation, and needs analyses that demonstrate funding needs are matched to the highest and best use, instead of driven by calls from developers who are seeking subsidized operations while they seek entitlements.

In addition, on page 5 of the City of Santa Monica’s Homelessness Strategic Plan one of the first stated values of the plan is to be transparent. I quote: “Transparent. We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community.” The mission statement of the strategic plan also claims to “promote the wellbeing of all”, but that clearly was not followed in the case of 413/825 Ocean Avenue.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1845 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 433
Sincerely,
Sarah Bederman
14130 Attilla Road, Santa Monica 90402 - Santa Monica Canyon [email protected]
323-422-8291
--
Sarah Miriam Bederman, PMH-C
M.A., TESOL
M.A., Spanish
Student, M.A. in Clinical Psychology with Emphasis in Marriage & Family Therapy - Pepperdine University Graduate School of Education & Psychology
Postpartum Support
International:

Specialized Coordinator for Unplanned C-Section + Online Support Group Facilitator [email protected]
"We must be the change we wish to see in the world." -Mahatma Gandhi "Education is not preparation for life; education is life itself." -Dewey Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1846 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 434
Mitchell Kois
From: Marianne Chow <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 11:46 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Grant Newman
Subject: Item 16B Support for Negrete

EXTERNAL
Dear Coucilmembers,
I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

The first public discussion on this topic took place Thursday, October 9th during a NOMA informational zoom meeting. However, it was clear the intention of St. Joseph’s and LA County was to open the facility illegally and without notice or community input. More so, fully formed operational polices or adequate safety measures to protect the surrounding neighborhood were not and have not been presented or accepted.

Furthermore, I am concerned to have learned from St. Joseph’s that individuals in this shelter will not be subject to drug testing or complete background checks, yet they will be permitted to exit and and enter the facility and community freely during the day. This poses significant risks to our community, especially given the proximity of schools, community parks and local residents. Additionally, it was suggested that others looking for homeless services would benefit from outreach being conducted in the surrounding area, effectively putting more homeless, mentally ill and drug addicts in the neighborhood. You are not simply housing 49 people you are a beacon to everyone looking for homeless services.

The potential impact on the safety and well-being of these children and staff members cannot be overstated. It is illegal for anyone on the sex registry to live within a mile of a school and your suggested background check process is not measurable or complete.

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1847 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 435
serious safety concerns surrounding another one his projects: https://www.latimes.com/homelesshousing/story/2024-11-05/new-owner-cuts-security-janitors-at-skid-row-homeless-housing-astenants-fear-worsening-conditions Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who attend the impacted schools.

Protect our children, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Marianne & Grant Newman
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1848 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 436
Mitchell Kois
From: Ankur Kumar <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 11:41 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Delay Opening of Proposed Mental Health Facilities with Voluntary Entry/ExitProcedures at 413/825 Ocean Ave Per Item 16-B

EXTERNAL
The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401

[Sent via email: [email protected]; [email protected]]

RE:Request to Delay Opening of Proposed Mental Health Facilities with Voluntary Entry/ExitProcedures at 413/825 Ocean Ave Per Item 16-B

As such, we want to record our opposition to this project and provide full support for Item 16-B on the October 14, 2025 City Council agenda, corresponding to Mayor Negrete’s October 9, 2025 memorandum titled “Request for City Council Direction on Community Engagement, Zoning Clarity, and Accountability for LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects.” This proposal offers a thoughtful and balanced framework that promotes compassion and transparency while ensuring accountability, public safety, and community trust for the entire population of Santa Monica. While this project is specific to the community near Palisades Park, every single community in Santa Monica deserves notification and public input in any projects that affect their community, writ large. While it is this community today, it can be any community tomorrow.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1849 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 437
We request the City and County work together to request a delay of the project at 413/825 Ocean Ave. until all of the items in 16-B have been discussed in public hearings and a new analysis explaining the rationale behind this project, the alternative sites that were considered, and if the County made a decision that is in compliance with the needs defined by the City and its residents.

Specifically, as it relates to Item 16-B:

This is fidelity to the law and the spirit of partnership that newly passed state requires.

The Mayor’s proposed public communications strategy—including a dedicated FAQ webpage, hotline for concerns, and clear follow-up protocols—is precisely the kind of accessible, factbased communication the community needs. The fact that no one has yet been able to access any public documentation regarding the process and application in which these facilities were approved and funded with taxpayer funds speaks to the lack of transparency the law requires.

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1850 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 438
of interest or active litigation exist. This transparency builds confidence in both the City’s and County’s stewardship of public resources, and that site selection is driven by thoughtful due diligence, published documentation, and needs analyses that demonstrate funding needs are matched to the highest and best use, instead of driven by calls from developers who are seeking subsidized operations while they seek entitlements.

In addition, on page 5 of the City of Santa Monica’sHomelessness Strategic Plan one of the first stated values of the plan is to be transparent. I quote: “Transparent. We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community.” The mission statement of the strategic plan also claims to “promote the wellbeing of all”, but that clearly was not followed in the case of 413/825 Ocean Avenue.

Sincerely,
Ankur Kumar
201 Ocean Avenue, Unit 809P, Santa Monica, CA 90402
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1851 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 439
Mitchell Kois
From: Nicole Sinkys <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 11:29 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Msgr. Lloyd Torgerson; Msgr. Lloyd A. Torgerson; Felipe Sanchez; Lana Negrete; [email protected]
Subject: Item 16B Support for Mayor Negrete

EXTERNAL
10/12/2025
To Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
[Sent via email: [email protected]; [email protected]] RE: Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Proposed Voluntary Entry/Exit Facilities for Mental Health Crises at 413/825 Ocean Ave
Dear Mayor Negrete, City Manager Chi, and Members of the City Council, I write to request a delay to the opening of the mental health facilities at 413 Ocean Ave and 825 Ocean Avenue that were approved with no notification or input from neighboring stakeholders. These facilities require no background checks or sobriety requirements, per a statement made by the LA County Department of Mental Health during a community town hall conducted on Thursday, October 9th. I also write to record my strong support for Item 16-B and Mayor Lana Negrete who has called for transparency, zoning clarity, and proper community engagement.

At the October 9th town hall, it was abundantly clear that there were far more questions than answers. The Department of Mental Health, the 3rd District County Supervisor’s office, and St.

Joseph’s were focused on presenting on what occurs in the facilities but had not fully considered the broader impacts on the surrounding community, which include preschools, elementary schools, senior living facilities, parks, local businesses, and tourism-heavy landmarks - all within a half-mile of these unlocked facilities.

To add insult to injury, on page 5 of the City of Santa Monica’s Homelessness Strategic Plan one of the first stated values of the plan is to be transparent. I quote: “Transparent. We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community.” The mission statement of the strategic plan also claims to “promote the wellbeing of all”, but that clearly was not followed in the case of 413/825 Ocean Avenue.

I share my heartfelt support for Mayor Lana Negrete’s leadership in addressing one of the most complex and sensitive challenges facing our community—how best to care for individuals living with severe mental illness and homelessness, while ensuring that our policies remain transparent, inclusive, and grounded in sound public process.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1852 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 440
Her emphasis on compliance with Welfare & Institutions Code §5604.2(a)(4))—which requires citizen and professional involvement at every stage of planning—honors both the spirit and the letter of these laws. These provisions are designed to guarantee that the voices of those with lived experience of mental illness, along with residents, local businesses, and first responders, are all heard and respected. Given the facilities’ close proximity to several senior living facilities, preschools, and elementary schools, the lack of a general community safety plan and/or early notification is grossly negligent.

I urge the City Council to adopt the Mayor’s recommendations and reaffirm the City’s commitment to transparency, accountability, and public participation that profoundly affect all our communities - both retroactively and prospectively.

Thank you for your service to our city and for considering this important item and considering delaying the opening of these facilities.

Sincerely,
Nicole Sinkys
307 Marguerita Ave.
[email protected]
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1853 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 441
Mitchell Kois
From: Lesley Bulechek <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 11:28 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16B Support for Negrete-Concerned City Resident

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmembers,
I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

Furthermore, I am concerned to have learned from St. Joseph’s that individuals in this shelter will not be subject to drug testing or complete background checks, yet they will be permitted to exit and and enter the facility and community freely during the day. This poses significant risks to our community, especially given the proximity of schools, community parks and local residents. Additionally, it was suggested that others looking for homeless services would benefit from outreach being conducted in the surrounding area, effectively putting more homeless, mentally ill and drug addicts in the neighborhood. You are not simply housing 49 people you are a beacon to everyone looking for homeless services.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1854 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 442
It is clear your security plan beyond the shelter is not complete or adequate. The reputation of your owner and “partner” in this facility was highlighted in this LA Times article from last year and details serious safety concerns surrounding another one his projects: https://www.latimes.com/homelesshousing/story/2024-11-05/new-owner-cuts-security-janitors-at-skid-row-homeless-housing-as-tenantsfear-worsening-conditions Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who attend the impacted schools.

Protect our children, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
~Lesley Bulechek, Santa Monica Resident
Lesley Bulechek
(310) 909-3883
[email protected]
Sent from my iPhone
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1855 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 443
Mitchell Kois
From: Sean Eskovitz <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 11:13 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Council Mailbox
Subject: 413 Ocean Avenue

EXTERNAL
I have been alarmed to learn about recent land use decisions that the Santa Monica City Council is making that threaten severe consequences for our city. The most recent of which, which I understand will allow a 49-bed homeless shelter/mental health facility at 413 Ocean, just steps away from an elementary school, is especially concerning. The Council must give far more consideraƟon to the inevitable consequences of decisions like this one, which will destroy an important and valuable part of our city. Pursuing these policies will, moreover, embroil the city in expensive, protracted liƟgaƟon and lead to a strong push to remove Councilmembers from their posts. As a parent, consƟtuent, and homeowner, I urge you to support item 16B and recognize our due process rights under SB326.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1856 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 444
Mitchell Kois
From: Erik Anderson <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 11:01 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Council Mailbox
Subject: Item 16B Support for Negrete

EXTERNAL
Dear Coucil members,
I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

The first public discussion on this topic took place Thursday, October 9th during a NOMA informational zoom meeting. However, it was clear the intention of St. Joseph’s and LA County was to open the facility illegally and without notice or community input. More so, fully formed operational polices or adequate safety measures to protect the surrounding neighborhood were not and have not been presented or accepted.

Furthermore, I am concerned to have learned from St. Joseph’s that individuals in this shelter will not be subject to drug testing or complete background checks, yet they will be permitted to exit and and enter the facility and community freely during the day. This poses significant risks to our community, especially given the proximity of schools, community parks and local residents. Additionally, it was suggested that others looking for homeless services would benefit from outreach being conducted in the surrounding area, effectively putting more homeless, mentally ill and drug addicts in the neighborhood. You are not simply housing 49 people you are a beacon to everyone looking for homeless services.

It is clear your security plan beyond the shelter is not complete or adequate. The reputation of your Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1857 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 445
owner and “partner” in this facility was highlighted in this LA Times article from last year and details serious safety concerns surrounding another one his projects: https://www.latimes.com/homelesshousing/story/2024-11-05/new-owner-cuts-security-janitors-at-skid-row-homeless-housing-as-tenantsfear-worsening-conditions Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who attend the impacted schools.

Protect our children, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Erik Anderson
--
Erik Anderson
630.205.3942
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1858 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 446
Mitchell Kois
From: michal spitzer <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 10:54 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Council Mailbox
Subject: Item 16B

EXTERNAL
RE: Item 16B Support for Negrete
Dear Coucilmembers,
I am wriƟng to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violaƟon of our due process rights.

The first public discussion on this topic took place Thursday, October 9th during a NOMA informaƟonal zoom meeƟng.

However, it was clear the intenƟon of St. Joseph’s and LA County was to open the facility illegally and without noƟce, community input. More so, fully formed operaƟonal polices or adequate safety measures to protect the surrounding neighborhood were not and have not been presented or accepted.

St. Joseph’s also shared a Ɵmeline that implicated city staff and at least 3 Councilmember’s, all who were informed of the project since February and provided no community outreach, further violaƟng our rights.

Furthermore, I am concerned to have learned from St. Joseph’s that individuals in this shelter will not be subject to drug tesƟng or complete background checks, yet they will be permiƩed to exit and and enter the facility and community freely during the day. This poses significant risks to our community, especially given the proximity of schools, community parks and local residents. AddiƟonally, it was suggested that others looking for homeless services would benefit from outreach being conducted in the surrounding area, effecƟvely puƫng more homeless, mentally ill and drug addicts in the neighborhood. You are not simply housing 49 people you are a beacon to everyone looking for homeless services.

Personally, I would like to highlight that the elementary school my child aƩends, Canyon Charter Elementary is located just 0.6miles from the planned shelter locaƟon. In addiƟon to Canyon, mulƟple other preschools and elementary schools in close proximity, educaƟng thousands of elementary-aged students. The potenƟal impact on the safety and well-being of these children and staff members cannot be overstated. It is illegal for anyone on the sex registry to live within a mile of a school and your suggested background check process is not measurable or complete.

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1859 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 447
condiƟons__;!!OfuUnHCITYtmmjM!uUv_8QGhVyVAfWLSOkPANQYDDSzHB7CYEM7aykbq0POaJE6ObhFU_ZC3Ih1IWOors cXxG_Ki_eMWYl0VcWnovseL_Xc4UpJhKg$
Simply accepƟng the risk and responsibility for approving this locaƟon is not acceptable. The introducƟon of such a facility without consideraƟon of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

It is your responsibility to prioriƟze the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who aƩend the impacted schools.

Protect our children, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Michal Davis
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1860 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 448
Mitchell Kois
From: Vicky Goodman <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 10:54 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Mental Health Advocate Perspective regarding 413 and 825 projects

EXTERNAL
October 12, 2025

The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401

[Sent via email: [email protected]; [email protected]]

RE: Request to Delay Opening of Proposed Mental Health Facilities with Voluntary Entry/Exit Procedures at 413/825 Ocean Ave Per Item 16-B

Dear Mayor Negrete, City Manager Chi, and Honorable Members of the City Council, I am writing to you as a resident of Santa Monica for 45 years and as community mental health advocate for the past 20. I am a founding member of the UCLA Resnick Hospital Board of Advisors and the founder and president of the Friends of the Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA.

In both these capacities, I am writing to express my concerns about the secretive negotiations between unnamed City Council Members, the City’s Housing and Human Services Department (HHS), the County Department of Mental Health (DMH) to fund – with taxpayer money – a 49-bed facility for the unhoused and several mentally ill. This project, according to the CEO of St. Joseph’s Center, was brought forward to the County only once a private developer who is currently suing the City of Santa Monica, sought out the County and St. Joseph’s to offer up his sites at 413 Ocean Avenue and 825 Ocean Avenue. In speaking with a senior Department of Mental Health official on October 8, he told me confidentially that he only heard about this project that morning when he was asked to represent the DMH at that evening's NOMA meeting.

I was also told by the former head of the DMH that "this would have never happened under his watch" as he put community first.

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1861 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 449
significant reverberations throughout the entire City. The secrecy in which this project was approved without any public notification, permitting requirements, or consideration of the surrounding community and its citywide financial burden is grossly negligent.

As such, we want to record our opposition to this project and provide full support for Item 16-B on the October 14, 2025 City Council agenda, corresponding to Mayor Negrete’s October 9, 2025 excellent and fair memorandum titled “Request for City Council Direction on Community Engagement, Zoning Clarity, and Accountability for LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects.” This proposal offers a thoughtful and balanced framework that promotes compassion and transparency while ensuring accountability, public safety, and community trust for the entire population of Santa Monica. While this project is specific to the community near Palisades Park, every single community in Santa Monica deserves notification and public input in any projects that affect their community. While it is this community today, it can be any community tomorrow.

We request the City and County work together to request a delay of the project at 413/825 Ocean Ave. until all of the items in 16-B have been discussed in public hearings and a new analysis explaining the rationale behind this project, the alternative sites that were considered, and if the County made a decision that is in compliance with the needs defined by the City and its residents.

Specifically, as it relates to Item 16-B:

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1862 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 450
facility, a transitional housing facility, an emergency shelter, and supportive housing—and how each is governed under City and State law. The Mayor’s proposed public communications strategy—including a dedicated FAQ webpage, hotline for concerns, and clear follow-up protocols—is precisely the kind of accessible, fact-based communication the community needs. The fact that no one has yet been able to access any public documentation regarding the process and application in which these facilities were approved and funded with taxpayer funds speaks to the lack of transparency the law requires.

5. Verification of Developer Qualifications and Financial Transparency Direction #5’s call for verification of the developer’s goals, operational record, legal standing, and compensation from LA County is essential for accountability. Residents have a right to know who is behind these projects, how public funds are being used, and whether any conflicts of interest or active litigation exist. This transparency builds confidence in both the City’s and County’s stewardship of public resources, and that site selection is driven by thoughtful due diligence, published documentation, and needs analyses that demonstrate funding needs are matched to the highest and best use, instead of driven by calls from developers who are seeking subsidized operations while they seek entitlements.

I respectfully urge the City Council to adopt all six directives in full and to hold LA County and its nonprofit partners to the highest standards of openness, compliance, and community collaboration.

In addition, on page 5 of the City of Santa Monica’s Homelessness Strategic Plan one of the first stated values of the plan is to be transparent. I quote: “Transparent. We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community.” The mission statement of the strategic plan also claims to “promote the wellbeing of all”, but that clearly was not followed in the case of 413/825 Ocean Avenue.

Sincerely,
Vicky Goodman
401 Ocean Avenue Unit 2
[email protected]
Vicky Goodman
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1863 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 451
President and Founder
Friends of the Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA Resnick Neuropsychiatric Hospital Board of Advisors
https://www.friendsofsemelinstitute.org/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/UCLAFriendsofSemel/
Instagram - uclafriendsofsemel
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNSI8bpQYwPqbq0wCfc42wA Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1864 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 452
Mitchell Kois
From: Kristina <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 10:48 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 & Request to Delay 413/825 Ocean

EXTERNAL
October 12, 2025
The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
[Sent via email: [email protected]; [email protected]] RE: Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Facilities for the Unhoused with Severe Mental Crises at 413/825 Ocean Ave Dear Mayor Negrete, City Manager Chi, and Honorable Members of the City Council, I am writing to express my opposition to the process in which the facilities for the severely mentally ill were approved with taxpayer funds at 413 and 825 Ocean Ave.

Mayor Negrete’s October 9 memorandum reflects a thoughtful and compassionate approach to public service.

Her acknowledgment of the urgent need for behavioral health housing, coupled with her insistence on due diligence, community engagement, and transparency, embodies the balanced leadership Santa Monica deserves.

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1865 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 453
matched by competence. This approach strengthens our collective ability to help people heal, stabilize, and reintegrate into the community.

Her leadership reminds us that compassion and accountability are not opposing values—they are inseparable.

A community that truly cares about its most vulnerable must also care deeply about how decisions are made, how funds are spent, and how every stakeholder is treated.

I stand in full support of Mayor Negrete’s efforts to make Santa Monica a model for both compassionate care and transparent governance.

As such, we hope you support all six requests in Mayor Negrete’s memo and pause the opening of the facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean until all the analyses are posted and shared with the public.

Thank you for your service to our city and for considering this important item.

Sincerely,
Kristina Brittenham
Santa Monica Resident
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1866 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 454
Mitchell Kois
From: Brigette Lubin <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 10:46 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Aaron Lubin
Subject: 413 Ocean Avenue - My in-laws live 4 doors down - this is unsafe for them Importance: High

We request the City and County work together to request a delay of the project at 413/825 Ocean Ave. until all of the items in 16-B have been discussed in public hearings and a new analysis explaining the rationale behind this project, the alternative sites that were considered, and if the County made a decision that is in compliance with the needs defined by the City and its residents.

Specifically, as it relates to Item 16-B:

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1867 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 455
radius. Residents and local business owners deserve timely notice and a chance to understand project goals, operations, and impacts. Transparent engagement fosters cooperation rather than conflict and ensures that city decisions reflect both compassion and local input.

Every Santa Monican deserves to understand what are allowable uses for the buildings in their communities, particularly around communities that serve children and seniors.

4. Public Explanation of Land Use and Operational Standards Direction #4 calls for a clear public explanation of the legal basis that allows these facilities to operate without a discretionary City permit. Residents must understand the distinctions between a mental health facility, a transitional housing facility, an emergency shelter, and supportive housing—and how each is governed under City and State law. The Mayor’s proposed public communications strategy—including a dedicated FAQ webpage, hotline for concerns, and clear follow-up protocols— is precisely the kind of accessible, fact-based communication the community needs. The fact that no one has yet been able to access any public documentation regarding the process and application in which these facilities were approved and funded with taxpayer funds speaks to the lack of transparency the law requires.

5. Verification of Developer Qualifications and Financial Transparency Direction #5’s call for verification of the developer’s goals, operational record, legal standing, and compensation from LA County is essential for accountability. Residents have a right to know who is behind these projects, how public funds are being used, and whether any conflicts of interest or active litigation exist. This transparency builds confidence in both the City’s and County’s stewardship of public resources, and that site selection is driven by thoughtful due diligence, published documentation, and needs analyses that demonstrate funding needs are matched to the highest and best use, instead of driven by calls from developers who are seeking subsidized operations while they seek entitlements.

In addition, on page 5 of the City of Santa Monica’s Homelessness Strategic Plan one of the first stated values of the plan is to be transparent. I quote: “Transparent. We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community.” The mission statement of the strategic plan also claims to “promote the wellbeing of all”, but that clearly was not followed in the case of 413/825 Ocean Avenue.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1868 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 456
Thank you for your leadership in ensuring Santa Monica’s approach to mental health and homelessness remains both compassionate and responsible. To that end, please work with our community and the County to pause the opening of the unlocked mental illness facilities at 413/825 Ocean Ave.

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1869 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 457
Mitchell Kois
From: Katherine Eskovitz <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 10:40 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16-Negrete

EXTERNAL
We are submitting our objection to the 49-bed homeless shelter with open door policy slated to open at 413 ocean avenue for the severely mentally ill.

We have are close friends with many neighbors whose kids walk to and attend school a thousand feet from the facility -- one of several schools (and preschools) in close walking distance.

We are extremely worried about the safety of this highly residential neighborhood with a young population and many schools.

As a parent and a constituent, we urge you to support item 16B, and our Due Process rights under SB326.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1870 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 458
Mitchell Kois
From: Matt Grode <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 10:31 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Ocean Avenue Homeless Shelter

EXTERNAL
Dear Coucilmembers,
I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

The first public discussion on this topic took place Thursday, October 9th during a NOMA informational zoom meeting. However, it was clear the intention of St. Joseph’s and LA County was to open the facility illegally and without notice or community input. More so, fully formed operational polices or adequate safety measures to protect the surrounding neighborhood were not and have not been presented or accepted.

Furthermore, I am concerned to have learned from St. Joseph’s that individuals in this shelter will not be subject to drug testing or complete background checks, yet they will be permitted to exit and and enter the facility and community freely during the day. This poses significant risks to our community, especially given the proximity of schools, community parks and local residents. Additionally, it was suggested that others looking for homeless services would benefit from outreach being conducted in the surrounding area, effectively putting more homeless, mentally ill and drug addicts in the neighborhood. You are not simply housing 49 people you are a beacon to everyone looking for homeless services.

Personally, I would like to highlight that the elementary school my grandchildren attend, Carlthorp School, is located just 0.3 miles from the planned shelter location. My other grandson attend Roosevelt Elementary which is .5 miles away. In addition to these two schools, multiple other preschools and elementary schools in close proximity, educating thousands of elementary-aged students. The potential impact on the safety and well-being of these children and staff members cannot be overstated. It is illegal for anyone on the sex registry to live within a mile of a school and your suggested background check process is not measurable or complete.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1871 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 459
It is clear your security plan beyond the shelter is not complete or adequate. The reputation of your owner and “partner” in this facility was highlighted in this LA Times article from last year and details serious safety concerns surrounding another one his projects:
https://www.latimes.com/homeless-housing/story/2024-11-05/new-owner-cuts-security-janitors-atskid-row-homeless-housing-as-tenants-fear-worsening-conditions Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who attend the impacted schools.

Protect our children, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Matt Grode
422 24th St
Santa Monica
Mobile: 310/694-1425
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1872 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 460
Mitchell Kois
From: Mariana Suarez <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 10:18 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16B Support for Negrete

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmembers,
I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1873 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 461
It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who attend the impacted schools.

Protect our neighborhood, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Mariana Suarez
Mariana G. Suarez
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1874 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 462
Mitchell Kois
From: Shireen Enayati <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 10:14 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Council Mailbox
Subject: Formal Opposition to Proposed Mental Health Facility on Ocean Avenue

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members:

I am writing as a lifelong Santa Monica resident, born and raised here, and I am absolutely outraged by the proposal to place a mental health facility on Ocean Avenue.

This decision is not only irrational — it is an insult to the residents who have built, supported, and loved this city for generations.

Over the last several years, Santa Monica has been transformed — and not for the better.

Reckless decisions made by city officials have made our once-beautiful, safe, and thriving community unrecognizable. Crime, homelessness, and general disorder have taken over our streets. What used to be one of the most desirable cities in the world has been allowed to deteriorate into a place where people no longer feel safe walking outside.

And now, the City wants to place a mental institution north of Montana — on what is arguably one of the most valuable and iconic pieces of property in the entire country. It’s beyond comprehension. It’s infuriating. How could anyone in their right mind think this is an appropriate use for such a location?
As a woman who has been assaulted by mentally ill homeless people near my home and by Palisades Park, I can say without hesitation that Santa Monica no longer feels safe.

Every day feels more unsettling. Children no longer feel secure riding their bikes or walking to school. Families and long-time residents are scared, frustrated, and heartbroken by what our city has become — and this proposal only makes things worse.

There are countless other locations better suited for such a facility — but North of Montana, oceanside Santa Monica should never have even been considered. This is yet another example of tone-deaf, irresponsible, and destructive decision-making from city officials who seem completely disconnected from the people they claim to serve.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1875 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 463
I am disgusted by the direction this city has taken. I have invested in Santa Monica, I own several properties here, and I have dedicated my life to being part of this community. Yet the decisions being made by the City are destroying everything that once made Santa Monica exceptional.

Enough is enough. Stop sacrificing the safety, beauty, and integrity of this city. Reject this plan — and start listening to the residents who actually live here, pay taxes here, and care about the future of Santa Monica.

Sincerely,
Shireen Enayati
Santa Monica Native and Property Owner
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1876 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 464
Mitchell Kois
From: Tim Tareco <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 10:11 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16B Support for Negrete

EXTERNAL
Dear Council members,
I am wriƟng to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violaƟon of our due process rights.

The first public discussion on this topic took place Thursday, October 9th during a NOMA informaƟonal zoom meeƟng.

It is clear your security plan beyond the shelter is not complete or adequate. The reputaƟon of your owner and “partner” in this facility was highlighted in this LA Times arƟcle from last year and details serious safety concerns surrounding another one his projects: hƩps://urldefense.com/v3/__hƩps://www.laƟmes.com/homeless-housing/story/2024-11- 05/new-owner-cuts-security-janitors-at-skid-row-homeless-housing-as-tenants-fear-worseningcondiƟons__;!!OfuUnHCITYtmmjM!soavJX9aqS4hvNt_3WpRRi5G09iIOEcQA0pSdNdDAaHqcAa0bZJSNVUjg3plIlIHCRY66kXy40JQeqDAY1Rxog$ Simply accepƟng the risk and responsibility for approving this locaƟon is not acceptable. The introducƟon of such a facility without consideraƟon of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

It is your responsibility to prioriƟze the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who aƩend the impacted schools.

Protect our neighborhood, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1877 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 465
Sincerely,
Tim Tareco
201 Ocean Avenue
Unit 1503B
Santa Monica, CA 90402
Ɵmtareco.com
917.576.7791
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1878 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 466
Mitchell Kois
From: Rebecca Gomez Hild <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 9:55 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: RE: Item 16B Support for Negrete

EXTERNAL
Dear Council members,
I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

Furthermore, I am concerned to have learned from St. Joseph’s that individuals in this shelter will not be subject to drug testing or complete background checks, yet they will be permitted to exit and and enter the facility and community freely during the day. This poses significant risks to our community, especially given the proximity of schools, community parks and local residents. Additionally, it was suggested that others looking for homeless services would benefit from outreach being conducted in the surrounding area, effectively putting more homeless, mentally ill and drug addicts in the neighborhood. You are not simply housing 49 people you are a beacon to everyone looking for homeless services.

It is clear your security plan beyond the shelter is not complete or adequate. The reputation of your Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1879 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 467
owner and “partner” in this facility was highlighted in this LA Times article from last year and details serious safety concerns surrounding another one his projects: https://www.latimes.com/homelesshousing/story/2024-11-05/new-owner-cuts-security-janitors-at-skid-row-homeless-housing-as-tenantsfear-worsening-conditions Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who attend the impacted schools.

Protect our children, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Rebecca Hild
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1880 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 468
Mitchell Kois
From: Suzanne Rode <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 9:48 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete
Subject: Item 16B support for negrete

EXTERNAL
To:
[email protected]
[email protected]
RE: Item 16B Support for Negrete
Dear Coucilmembers,
I am wriƟng to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violaƟon of our due process rights.

The first public discussion on this topic took place Thursday, October 9th during a NOMA informaƟonal zoom meeƟng.

However, it was clear the intenƟon of St. Joseph’s and LA County was to open the facility illegally and without noƟce or community input. More so, fully formed operaƟonal polices or adequate safety measures to protect the surrounding neighborhood were not and have not been presented or accepted.

Personally, I would like to highlight that the elementary school my children aƩend, Carlthorp School, is located just 0.3 miles from the planned shelter locaƟon. In addiƟon to Carlthorp, mulƟple other preschools and elementary schools in close proximity, educaƟng thousands of elementary-aged students. The potenƟal impact on the safety and well-being of these children and staff members cannot be overstated. It is illegal for anyone on the sex registry to live within a mile of a school and your suggested background check process is not measurable or complete.

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1881 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 469
05/new-owner-cuts-security-janitors-at-skid-row-homeless-housing-as-tenants-fear-worseningcondiƟons__;!!OfuUnHCITYtmmjM!vWetOvyPlvmXyOcrwsbul_pORlIStu3pmMTt5Cv5ungyA50tyYIU819XOxuE3oiI6k7Dsi nYQKVpY6ldrxNACiXT_6Pa8rVS6A$
Simply accepƟng the risk and responsibility for approving this locaƟon is not acceptable. The introducƟon of such a facility without consideraƟon of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

It is your responsibility to prioriƟze the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who aƩend the impacted schools.

Protect our children, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Suzanne Hunt
Santa Monica Resident and Parent
Sent from my iPhone
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1882 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 470
Mitchell Kois
From: Lily Ablon <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 9:31 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Council Mailbox
Subject: Item 16B Support for Negrete

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmembers,
I am wriƟng to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violaƟon of our due process rights.

The first public discussion on this topic took place Thursday, October 9th during a NOMA informaƟonal zoom meeƟng.

Furthermore, I am concerned to have learned from St. Joseph’s that individuals in this shelter will not be subject to drug tesƟng or complete background checks, yet they will be permiƩed to exit and and enter the facility and community freely during the day. This poses significant risks to our community, especially given the proximity of THREE elementary schools, community parks and local residents. AddiƟonally, it was suggested that others looking for homeless services would benefit from outreach being conducted in the surrounding area, effecƟvely puƫng more homeless, mentally ill and drug addicts in the neighborhood. You are not simply housing 49 people you are a beacon to everyone looking for homeless services.

It is clear your security plan beyond the shelter is not complete or adequate. The reputaƟon of your owner and “partner” in this facility has been quesƟoned due to quesƟonable acƟons/decisions operaƟng similar faciliƟes.

Simply accepƟng the risk and responsibility for approving this locaƟon is not acceptable. The introducƟon of such a facility without consideraƟon of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

It is your responsibility to prioriƟze the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who aƩend the impacted schools.

Protect our neighborhood, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Lily Ablon
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1883 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 471
Sent from my iPhone
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1884 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 472
Mitchell Kois
From: Kiley Taslitz <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 9:31 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16B Support for Negrete

EXTERNAL
Dear Coucil members,
I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

The first public discussion on this topic took place Thursday, October 9th during a NOMA informational zoom meeting. However, it was clear the intention of St. Joseph’s and LA County was to open the facility illegally and without notice or community input. More so, fully formed operational polices or adequate safety measures to protect the surrounding neighborhood were not and have not been presented or accepted.

Furthermore, I am concerned to have learned from St. Joseph’s that individuals in this shelter will not be subject to drug testing or complete background checks, yet they will be permitted to exit and and enter the facility and community freely during the day. This poses significant risks to our community, especially given the proximity of schools, community parks and local residents. Additionally, it was suggested that others looking for homeless services would benefit from outreach being conducted in the surrounding area, effectively putting more homeless, mentally ill and drug addicts in the neighborhood. You are not simply housing 49 people you are a beacon to everyone looking for homeless services.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1885 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 473
It is clear your security plan beyond the shelter is not complete or adequate. The reputation of your owner and “partner” in this facility was highlighted in this LA Times article from last year and details serious safety concerns surrounding another one his projects: https://www.latimes.com/homelesshousing/story/2024-11-05/new-owner-cuts-security-janitors-at-skid-row-homeless-housing-as-tenantsfear-worsening-conditions Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who attend the impacted schools.

Protect our children, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Kiley Anderson
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1886 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 474
Mitchell Kois
From: Robert Vartan <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 9:27 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Santa Monica City Manager's Office Subject: Item 16B Support for Negrete

EXTERNAL
Dear Council members,
I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

The first public discussion on this topic took place Thursday, October 9th during a NOMA informational zoom meeting.

However, it was clear the intention of St. Joseph’s and LA County was to open the facility illegally and without notice, community input. More so, fully formed operational polices or adequate safety measures to protect the surrounding neighborhood were not and have not been presented or accepted.

Santa Monica City CouncilOctober 14, 2025

Santa Monica City Council
October 14, 2025