Agenda packet — Santa Monica City Council, October 14, 2025 (part 8 of 8)

St. Joseph’s also shared a timeline that implicated city staff and at least 3 Councilmember’s, all who were informed of the project since February and provided no community outreach, further violating our rights.

Furthermore, I am concerned to have learned from St. Joseph’s that individuals in this shelter will not be subject to drug testing or complete background checks, yet they will be permitted to exit and and enter the facility and community freely during the day. This poses significant risks to our community, especially given the proximity of schools, community parks and local residents. Additionally, it was suggested that others looking for homeless services would benefit from outreach being conducted in the surrounding area, effectively putting more homeless, mentally ill and drug addicts in the neighborhood. You are not simply housing 49 people you are a beacon to everyone looking for homeless services.

Personally, I would like to highlight that the elementary school my children attend, Roosevelt elementary School, is located just 0.8miles from the planned shelter location. In addition to Roosevelt, multiple other preschools and elementary schools in close proximity, educating thousands of elementary-aged students. The potential impact on the safety and well-being of these children and staff members cannot be overstated. It is illegal for anyone on the sex registry to live within a mile of a school and your suggested background check process is not measurable or complete.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1887 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 475
It is clear your security plan beyond the shelter is not complete or adequate. The reputation of your owner and “partner” in this facility was highlighted in this LA Times article from last year and details serious safety concerns surrounding another one his projects: https://www.latimes.com/homelesshousing/story/2024-11-05/new-owner-cuts-security-janitors-at-skid-row-homeless-housing-as-tenantsfear-worsening-conditions Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who attend the impacted schools.

Protect our children, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Rob
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1888 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 476
Mitchell Kois
From: Mary Choi <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 9:00 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16B Support for Negrete

EXTERNAL
Dear Counclmembers,
I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

We have organized hundreds of people in days, soon it will be thousands, and we are deeply concerned about the planned opening of the homeless shelter on Ocean Avenue intended to serve 49 seriously mentally ill, drug-addicted and homeless individuals.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

The first public discussion on this topic took place THURSDAY, October 9th during a NOMA informational zoom meeting. However, it was clear the intention of St. Joseph's and LA County was to open the facility illegally and without notice or community input. Moreso, fully formed operational policies or adequate safety measures to protect the surrounding neighborhood were not and have not been presented or accepted.

St. Joseph's also shared a timeline that implicated city staff and at least THREE councilmembers, all who were informed of the project since FEBRUARY and provided no community outreach, further violating our rights.

Furthermore, I am concerned to have learned from St. Joseph's that individuals in this shelter will not be subject to drug testing or complete background checks, yet they will be permitted to exit and enter the facility and community freely during the day. This poses significant risks to our community, especially given the proximity of schools, community parks, and local residents. Additionally it was suggested that others looking for homeless services would benefit from outreach being conducted in the surrounding area, effectively putting more homeless, mentally ill and drug addicts in the neighborhood. You are not simply housing 49 people--you are attracting others seeking services, in an area we can all agree is not ideal for this project.

Personally, I would like to highlight that the elementary school my children attend is located within a mile of the planned shelter location. Please consider this detail. The center is in close proximity to multiple preschools and elementary schools, where thousands of elementary-aged children spend most of their days. This is not a bus-commuter area. We park on the streets. We walk our children through the same neighborhoods your patients will roam (without background checks, mind you). The potential impact on the safety and well-being of these children and staff members cannot be overstated. It is Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1889 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 477
illegal for anyone on the sex registry to live within a mile of a school and your suggested background check process is not measurable or complete.

It is clear your security plan beyond the shelter is not complete or adequate. The reputation of your owner and "partner" in this facility was highlighted in an LA Times article from last year and details serious safety concerns surrounding another one of his projects.

Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who attend the impacted schools.

Protect our children, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Mary Park
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1890 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 478
Mitchell Kois
From: Sarah J. <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 8:55 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; [email protected]

EXTERNAL
The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401

[Sent via email: [email protected]; [email protected]] The Honorable Lindsey P Horvath
Los Angeles County Supervisor, Third District
500 West Temple Street, Room 866
Los Angeles, CA 90012
[Sent via email: [email protected]]
RE:Request to Delay Opening of Proposed Mental Health Facilities with Voluntary Entry/ExitProcedures at 413/825 Ocean Ave Per Item 16-B

Dear Mayor Negrete, City Manager Chi, Honorable Members of the City Council and Supervise Horvath;
I am a mother, a taxpayer, and a deeply concerned citizen of Santa Monica. Twenty years ago, my grandfather was a resident of this very building. He was among the seniors fortunate enough to enjoy the dignity of an ocean view and the comfort of a professional, caring team supporting his daily needs. That was a time when this city valued its residents, its safety, and its integrity.

Today, I am appalled that the City would move forward with such a proposal—quietly, without transparency, and without regard for the people who live here. After an already devastating year marked by negligence and disregard for community well-being, this feels like yet another betrayal of public trust.

I grew up in Santa Monica and the Palisades. It was once a vibrant, prosperous city that attracted families and businesses alike. Now, it faces the same decay and dysfunction that plague the broader Los Angeles area. Every day, our streets reflect a worsening crisis of untreated mental illness and homelessness, despite the City’s repeated claims of funding and progress. We do not see the results. We do not feel safer. And we no longer believe the promises.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1891 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 479
And now, the introduction of this unlocked mental
health facility feels deeply disrespectful to the people who have built their lives and families here.

The recent Palisades Fire was a sobering reminder of how fragile safety has become in our coastal communities. Many of us watched in fear as the flames spread, knowing how unprepared and reactive our local systems have become. Instead of addressing the glaring deficiencies exposed by that disaster—fire prevention, emergency response, evacuation planning—the City seems more focused on pushing forward ill-conceived projects that put residents at greater risk.

When I read the claim that Los Angeles is ranked the
second safest city in America, I laughed out loud. It is an insult to every resident who has witnessed the
opposite. The idea of placing a facility of this nature within steps of our homes—where my three young
children walk, play, and live—is reckless, dangerous,
and wholly unacceptable.

I am demanding accountability. The residents of this community deserve honesty, transparency, and respect. If the City continues to disregard its citizens and ignore the very real dangers we face—from wildfires to rising crime—it will not only lose our trust but meet firm and organized resistance from those of us determined to protect our homes, our children, and what Santa Monica once stood for.

Today, I am writing as a Santa Monica resident to express my concerns about the secretive negotiations between unnamed City Council Members, the City’s Housing and Human Services Department (HHS), the County Department of Mental Health (DMH) to fund – with taxpayer money – a 49-bed facility for the homeless and several mentally ill. This project, according to the CEO of St. Joseph’s Center, was brought forward to the County when a private developer who is currently suing the City of Santa Monica, sought out the County and St. Joseph’s to provide taxpayer support to subsidize his property at 413 Ocean Avenue and 825 Ocean Avenue.

While residents of Santa Monica must notify their surrounding neighbors for a mere hedge modification or expansion of a school sports court, no courtesy was provided to the community on this project that has significant reverberations throughout the entire City. The secrecy in which this project was approved without any public notification, permitting requirements, or consideration of the surrounding community and itscitywide financial burden is grossly negligent.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1892 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 480
As such, we want to record our opposition to this project and provide full support for Item 16-B on the October 14, 2025 City Council agenda, corresponding to Mayor Negrete’s October 9, 2025 memorandum titled “Request for City Council Direction on Community Engagement, Zoning Clarity, and Accountability for LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects.” This proposal offers a thoughtful and balanced framework that promotes compassion and transparency while ensuring accountability, public safety, and community trust for the entire population of Santa Monica. While this project is specific to the community near Palisades Park, every single community in Santa Monica deserves notification and public input in any projects that affect their community, writ large. While it is this community today, it can be any community tomorrow.

We request the City and County work together to request a delay of the project at 413/825 Ocean Ave. until all of the items in 16-B have been discussed in public hearings and a new analysis explaining the rationale behind this project, the alternative sites that were considered, and if the County made a decision that is in compliance with the needs defined by the City and its residents.

Specifically, as it relates to Item 16-B:

1. Comprehensive Outreach and Communication
We strongly support Direction #1, which calls for coordination between the City, LA County Department of Mental Health (DMH), St. Joseph Center, and the project developer to ensure robust outreach to residents and nearby businesses—including the numerous schools, hotels, small businesses, and other stakeholders along Ocean Avenue and its surrounding radius. Residents and local business owners deserve timely notice and a chance to understand project goals, operations, and impacts. Transparent engagement fosters cooperation rather than conflict and ensures that city decisions reflect both compassion and local input.

2. Compliance with Proposition 1 and the Good Neighbor Policy Direction #2 correctly emphasizes compliance with all state laws. These laws explicitly require citizen and professional involvement at all stages of the planning process (Welfare & Institutions Code §5604.2(a)(4)). Enforcing these mandates ensures that mental health projects are developed with appropriate compassion for affected communities with input from residents, law enforcement, educators, housing experts, business owners, and those with lived experience.

This is fidelity to the law and the spirit of partnership that newly passed state requires.

3. Clarification of Zoning and Public Notification Requirements Direction #3 requests clarification of zoning classifications, use types, and public notice procedures for supportive, shelter, and transitional housing projects. Clear zoning definitions protect both residents and service providers by establishing predictable rules and preventing misunderstandings about what types of uses are permitted “by right.” Ensuring that every neighborhood receives formal notice when a project is proposed is an essential safeguard for democratic participation. Every Santa Monican deserves to understand what are allowable uses for the buildings in their communities, particularly around communities that serve children and seniors.

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1893 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 481
supportive housing—and how each is governed under City and State law.

The Mayor’s proposed public communications strategy—including a dedicated FAQ webpage, hotline for concerns, and clear follow-up protocols—is precisely the kind of accessible, factbased communication the community needs. The fact that no one has yet been able to access any public documentation regarding the process and application in which these facilities were approved and funded with taxpayer funds speaks to the lack of transparency the law requires.

5. Verification of Developer Qualifications and Financial Transparency Direction #5’s call for verification of the developer’s goals, operational record, legal standing, and compensation from LA County is essential for accountability. Residents have a right to know who is behind these projects, how public funds are being used, and whether any conflicts of interest or active litigation exist. This transparency builds confidence in both the City’s and County’s stewardship of public resources, and that site selection is driven by thoughtful due diligence, published documentation, and needs analyses that demonstrate funding needs are matched to the highest and best use, instead of driven by calls from developers who are seeking subsidized operations while they seek entitlements.

6. Retrospective Review and Corrective Action
Direction #6 ensures that the entire City of Santa Monica benefits from a thoughtful approach to compassionate care. We must learn from past experience by reviewing similar projects in Sunset Park and the Pico Neighborhood. If community engagement was inadequate in earlier projects, the City should take corrective steps now—establishing consistent contact systems, feedback channels, and neighborhood support mechanisms. This proactive stance prevents repeated errors and strengthens long-term public trust. Given the City’s financial challenges with cut services, particularly in public safety, we must provide support to all affected services across the City that no department is overly burdened by County-driven decisions that silence City taxpayers.

Conclusion
The Mayor’s memo provides a clear roadmap toward a balanced approach—one that supports mental health initiatives while demanding accountability, transparency, and respect for Santa Monica residents. I respectfully urge the City Council to adopt all six directives in full and to hold LA County and its nonprofit partners to the highest standards of openness, compliance, and community collaboration.

In addition, on page 5 of the City of Santa Monica’s Homelessness Strategic Plan one of the first stated values of the plan is to be transparent. I quote: “Transparent. We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community.” The mission statement of the strategic plan also claims to “promote the wellbeing of all”, but that clearly was not followed in the case of 413/825 Ocean Avenue.

This is not just about policy—it is about people. It is about families who have built their lives here, children who deserve safety, and seniors who once found peace in this community. It is about restoring trust in a city that has lost its way.

I am pleading with you: work with our community and with the County to pause the opening of the unlocked mental illness facilities at 413/825 Ocean Avenue. Show us that Santa Monica still stands for transparency, safety, and compassion—not secrecy, danger, and disregard.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1894 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 482
The residents of this city will not remain silent. We love Santa Monica, and we will fight to preserve the safety, dignity, and integrity that once defined it.

Sincerely,
Sarah Jonovic
102 Ocean Way, Santa Monica 90402
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1895 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 483
Mitchell Kois
From: Jane Holmes <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 8:55 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Council Mailbox
Subject: Item 16B Support for Negrete
Importance: High

EXTERNAL
I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

We have organized hundreds of people in days, soon it will be thousands, and we are all deeply concerned about the planned opening of the homeless shelter on Ocean Avenue intended to serve 49 seriously mentally ill, drug addicted and homeless individuals.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

The first public discussion on this topic took place Thursday, October 9th during a NOMA informational zoom meeting. However, it was clear the intention of St. Joseph’s and LA County was to open the facility illegally and without notice or community input. More so, fully formed operational polices or adequate safety measures to protect the surrounding neighborhood were not and have not been presented or accepted.

The potential impact on the safety and well-being of these children and staff members cannot be overstated. It is illegal for anyone on the sex registry to live within a mile of a school and your suggested background check process is not measurable or complete.

It is clear your security plan beyond the shelter is not complete or adequate. The reputation of your owner and “partner” in this facility was highlighted in this LA Times article from last year and details serious safety concerns surrounding another one his projects:
https://www.latimes.com/homeless-housing/story/2024-11-05/new-owner-cuts-security-janitors-at-skid-row-homeless-housing-astenants-fear-worsening-conditions Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who attend the impacted schools.

Protect our children, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Jane Holmes
Resident of Santa Monica
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1896 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 484
Mitchell Kois
From: Leila Nasseri <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 8:47 AM
To: Council Mailbox
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16 B Support for Negrete

EXTERNAL
RE: Item 16B Support for Negrete
Dear Coucilmembers,
I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

The potential impact on the safety and well-being of these children and staff members cannot be Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1897 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 485
overstated. It is illegal for anyone on the sex registry to live within a mile of a school and your suggested background check process is not measurable or complete.

It is clear your security plan beyond the shelter is not complete or adequate. The reputation of your owner and “partner” in this facility was highlighted in this LA Times article from last year and details serious safety concerns surrounding another one his projects: https://www.latimes.com/homelesshousing/story/2024-11-05/new-owner-cuts-security-janitors-at-skid-row-homeless-housing-astenants-fear-worsening-conditions Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who attend the impacted schools.

Protect our children, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Leila Vavra
My new email address: [email protected]
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1898 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 486
Mitchell Kois
From: Julie Chung <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 8:47 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Council Mailbox
Subject: RE: Item 16B Support for Negrete

EXTERNAL
Dear Coucilmembers,
I am wriƟng to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violaƟon of our due process rights.

The first public discussion on this topic took place Thursday, October 9th during a NOMA informaƟonal zoom meeƟng.

However, it was clear the intenƟon of St. Joseph’s and LA County was to open the facility illegally and without noƟce or community input. More so, fully formed operaƟonal polices or adequate safety measures to protect the surrounding neighborhood were not and have not been presented or accepted.

St. Joseph’s also shared a Ɵmeline that implicated city staff and at least 3 Councilmember’s, all who were informed of the project since February and provided no community outreach, further violaƟng our rights.

Furthermore, I am concerned to have learned from St. Joseph’s that individuals in this shelter will not be subject to drug tesƟng or complete background checks, yet they will be permiƩed to exit and and enter the facility and community freely during the day. This poses significant risks to our community, especially given the proximity of schools, community parks and local residents. AddiƟonally, it was suggested that others looking for homeless services would benefit from outreach being conducted in the surrounding area, effecƟvely puƫng more homeless, mentally ill and drug addicts in the neighborhood. You are not simply housing 49 people you are a beacon to everyone looking for homeless services.

Personally, I would like to highlight that the elementary school my children aƩend, Carlthorp School, is located just 0.3 miles from the planned shelter locaƟon. In addiƟon to Carlthorp, mulƟple other preschools and elementary schools in close proximity, educaƟng thousands of elementary-aged students. The potenƟal impact on the safety and well-being of these children and staff members cannot be overstated. It is illegal for anyone on the sex registry to live within a mile of a school and your suggested background check process is not measurable or complete.

It is clear your security plan beyond the shelter is not complete or adequate. The reputaƟon of your owner and “partner” in this facility was highlighted in this LA Times arƟcle from last year and details serious safety concerns surrounding another one his projects: hƩps://urldefense.com/v3/__hƩps://www.laƟmes.com/homeless-housing/story/2024-11- 05/new-owner-cuts-security-janitors-at-skid-row-homeless-housing-as-tenants-fear-worseningcondiƟons__;!!OfuUnHCITYtmmjM!tacACltzm1y4ufXUm942i8ZwAfuMQvcD9veWzO4vVqC_frhvZNWFKi93aCsKMjgacnNY MeMESNlv52lOxf-huOl-i1M6nWk$
Simply accepƟng the risk and responsibility for approving this locaƟon is not acceptable. The introducƟon of such a facility without consideraƟon of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1899 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 487
It is your responsibility to prioriƟze the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who aƩend the impacted schools.

Protect our children, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Dr. Juliet Chung
Sent from my iPhone
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1900 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 488
Mitchell Kois
From: Dena Cook <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 8:46 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Ocean Avenue Homeless Shelter - Item 16B Support for Negrete Importance: High

EXTERNAL
Dear Council members,
I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

St. Joseph’s also shared a timeline that implicated city staƯ and at least 3 Councilmember’s, all who were informed of the project since February and provided no community outreach, further violating our rights.

Furthermore, I am concerned to have learned from St. Joseph’s that individuals in this shelter will not be subject to drug testing or complete background checks, yet they will be permitted to exit and and enter the facility and community freely during the day. This poses significant risks to our community, especially given the proximity of schools, community parks and local residents. Additionally, it was suggested that others looking for homeless services would benefit from outreach being conducted in the surrounding area, eƯectively putting more homeless, mentally ill and drug addicts in the neighborhood. You are not simply housing 49 people you are a beacon to everyone looking for homeless services.

Personally, I would like to highlight that the elementary school my children attend, Carlthorp School, is located just 0.3 miles from the planned shelter location. In addition to Carlthorp, multiple other preschools and elementary schools in close proximity, educating thousands of elementary-aged students. The potential impact on the safety and well-being of these children and staƯ members cannot be overstated. It is illegal for anyone on the sex registry to live within a mile of a school and your suggested background check process is not measurable or complete.

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1901 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 489
concerns surrounding another one his projects: https://www.latimes.com/homeless-housing/story/2024-11- 05/new-owner-cuts-security-janitors-at-skid-row-homeless-housing-as-tenants-fear-worsening-conditions Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who attend the impacted schools.

Protect our children, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Dena Cook
Dena Cook | Co-founder
310.600.7160
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1902 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 490
Mitchell Kois
From: HANNAH MINGHELLA <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 8:34 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Delay Opening of Proposed Mental Health Facilities with Voluntary Entry/Exit Procedures at 413/825 Ocean Ave Per Item 16-B

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete, City Manager Chi, and Honorable Members of the City Council, I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

Personally, I would like to highlight that the elementary school my children attend, Carlthorp School, is located just 0.3 miles from the planned shelter location. In addition to Carlthorp, there are multiple other preschools and elementary schools in close proximity, educating thousands of elementary-aged students. The potential impact on the safety and well-being of these children and staff members cannot be overstated. It is illegal for anyone on the sex registry to live within a mile of a school and yet you will be placing nearly 50 seriously mentally ill individuals less than 1/3 of a mile from our school and your suggested background check process is not measurable or complete.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1903 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 491
It is clear your security plan beyond the shelter is inadequate. The reputation of your owner and “partner” in this facility was highlighted in this LA Times article from last year and details serious safety concerns surrounding another one his projects: https://www.latimes.com/homeless-housing/story/2024-11- 05/new-owner-cuts-security-janitors-at-skid-row-homeless-housing-as-tenants-fear-worseningconditions Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who attend the impacted schools.

Protect our children, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Hannah Minghella
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1904 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 492
Mitchell Kois
From: warren brand <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 8:25 AM
To: Council Mailbox
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16and a Request to Delay Opening of Shelters for the Severely Mentally Ill at 413/825 Ocean Ave

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete, City Manager Chi, and Honorable Members of the City Council, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the process by which approvals and funding were secured for the two proposed mental health housing facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue. During the community town hall held on Thursday, October 9th, reps from the LA County Department of Mental Health confirmed that these facilities will not require background checks or sobriety. These policies raise serious safety and accountability concerns for nearby residents.

At the same time, I want to express my full support for Mayor Lana Negrete’s leadership and her recent memo calling for transparency and accountability surrounding these projects. Her call for clarity reflects the type of leadership Santa Monica needs at this critical time.

As a resident living next door to one of these sites, I can personally attest to the ongoing challenges in our neighborhood. We already experience frequent disturbances in the alleys and surrounding streets due to unhoused individuals. There have been repeated incidents of thefts and people sleeping or bathing in shared residential amenities such as our pool and jacuzzi. Our building is home to many seniors and families with young children, and these conditions already create a sense of vulnerability and unease.

Our community cares deeply about helping those who are struggling with homelessness and mental illness. However, these facilities are being placed in areas surrounded by senior housing, preschools, and elementary schools, all within a half-mile radius. Placing such facilities in dense residential and tourism-heavy zones, rather than near major transit lines in commercial or industrial areas, presents significant challenges for both the residents of the facilities and the surrounding community The Ocean Avenue and Palisades Park area plays a vital role in Santa Monica’s economy, supporting small businesses, schools, senior facilities, and tourism. The revenue generated here helps sustain essential city services at a time when our finances are already strained. It is critical that decisions of this magnitude are made with care, foresight, and full transparency.

For these reasons, I strongly urge the City Council to pause the opening of the 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue facilities until all due diligence has been completed and public hearings have been held.

Moving forward without proper review, impact studies, or open community discussion would undermine public trust and risk the safety and stability of both residents and future program participants. A temporary pause is a responsible and necessary step to ensure that Santa Monica approaches this issue thoughtfully and in accordance with its own standards for community engagement.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1905 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 493
Finally, I ask that the Council uphold the values outlined in Santa Monica’s Homelessness Strategic Plan, which begins with a commitment to transparency:
“We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community.”
The plan also commits to “promote the wellbeing of all,” yet that principle was not followed in the case of 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue. Our city deserves a process that honors those words through open dialogue, data-driven decisions, and respect for all stakeholders.

Thank you for your service to our community and for considering this important matter with the seriousness and care it deserves.

Sincerely,
Warren Brand
Resident
Ocean Ave. Santa Monica
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1906 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 494
Mitchell Kois
From: Amara Teresa Hastings <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 8:16 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: 413 & 825 Ocean Avenue Mental Health Facilities

EXTERNAL
RE: Item 16B Support for Negrete
Dear Coucilmembers,
I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

I am deeply concerned about the planned opening of the homeless shelters on Ocean Avenue intended to serve 49 seriously mentally ill, drug addicted and homeless individuals. Especially the one on Ocean at Georgina, closest to my home.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

In Santa Monica it takes so much effort to get permits to do simple home maintenance work. And I personally spent a lot of time, and energy supporting the creation of the Rainbow Garden on Montana and 4th, as the city talked to neighbors, had public input, etc. That was for a GARDEN. And now there apparently were secretive plans to allow a shelter for mentally ill people at the end of our street without any public conversation at all. This is unacceptable.

The first public discussion on this topic took place on Thursday, October 9th during a NOMA informational zoom meeting. However, it was clear the intention of St. Joseph’s and LA County was to open the facility illegally and without notice, or community input. More so, fully formed operational polices or adequate safety measures to protect the surrounding neighborhood were not and have not been presented or accepted.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1907 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 495
It is clear your security plan beyond the shelter is not complete or adequate. The reputation of your owner and “partner” in this facility was highlighted in this LA Times article from last year and details serious safety concerns surrounding another one his projects: https://www.latimes.com/homelesshousing/story/2024-11-05/new-owner-cuts-security-janitors-at-skid-row-homeless-housing-as-tenantsfear-worsening-conditions Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who live in the neighborhood and attend the impacted schools.

Protect our neighborhood, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Please see and sign this petition! It has grown significantly in numbers in a matter of just a few days. https://c.org/48yK5yYxtj
Sincerely,
Amara Hastings
Georgina Avenue Resident
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1908 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 496
Mitchell Kois
From: Drue Balaban-Naish <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 8:13 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: RE: Item 16B Support for Negrete

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmembers,
I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

The first public discussion on this topic took place Thursday, October 9th during a NOMA informational zoom meeting. However, it was clear the intention of St. Joseph’s and LA County was to open the facility illegally and without notice, community input. More so, fully formed operational polices or adequate safety measures to protect the surrounding neighborhood were not and have not been presented or accepted.

Furthermore, I am concerned to have learned from St. Joseph’s that individuals in this shelter will not be subject to drug testing or complete background checks, yet they will be permitted to exit and and enter the facility and community freely during the day. This poses significant risks to our community, especially given the proximity of THREE elementary schools, community parks and local residents. Additionally, it was suggested that others looking for homeless services would benefit from outreach being conducted in the surrounding area, effectively putting more homeless, mentally ill and drug addicts in the neighborhood. You are not simply housing 49 people you are a beacon to everyone looking for homeless services.

It is clear your security plan beyond the shelter is not complete or adequate. The reputation of your owner and “partner” in this facility has been questioned due to questionable actions/decisions operating similar facilities.

Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1909 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 497
It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who attend the impacted schools.

Protect our neighborhood, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
- - -
Drue Balaban Naish
Excuse typos. Sent from my phone
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1910 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 498
Mitchell Kois
From: Sarah Miriam Bederman <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 7:55 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: RE: Item 16B Support for Negrete

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmembers,
I am wriƟng to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violaƟon of our due process rights.

The first public discussion on this topic took place Thursday, October 9th during a NOMA informaƟonal zoom meeƟng.

However, it was clear the intenƟon of St. Joseph’s and LA County was to open the facility illegally and without noƟce, community input. More so, fully formed operaƟonal polices or adequate safety measures to protect the surrounding neighborhood were not and have not been presented or accepted.

It is clear your security plan beyond the shelter is not complete or adequate. The reputaƟon of your owner and “partner” in this facility was highlighted in this LA Times arƟcle from last year and details serious safety concerns surrounding another one his projects: hƩps://urldefense.com/v3/__hƩps://www.laƟmes.com/homeless-housing/story/2024-11- 05/new-owner-cuts-security-janitors-at-skid-row-homeless-housing-as-tenants-fear-worseningcondiƟons__;!!OfuUnHCITYtmmjM!pEtPkH5kpaYiOlha6b8iStYDAqaXS3DpOpHgxVUEGm6tD3j9C3oTewC00iFINhiFY3pmPrMNFWvWqoaySpoh_s35K64FP6WTFL2$ Simply accepƟng the risk and responsibility for approving this locaƟon is not acceptable. The introducƟon of such a facility without consideraƟon of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1911 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 499
It is your responsibility to prioriƟze the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who aƩend the impacted schools.

Protect our children, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Sarah Bederman
Sent from my iPhone
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1912 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 500
Mitchell Kois
From: Camille-Claire Grayson <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 7:52 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16B Support for Negret

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmembers,
I am writing to urge your support for Item 16B, which upholds our due process rights under SB326. We, the citizens, demand our right to due process.

Please understand that we are organizing, and the people are speaking. We will no longer tolerate the city prioritizing the needs of the homeless above the safety and well-being of our children, families, and tax-paying citizens. This approach by the LA City government has already driven businesses and significant tax contributors away, leaving our city diminished. If this continues, Santa Monica risks becoming like Philadelphia. As citizens, we will not allow this to happen to the land on which we pay taxes. The current situation with the homeless population is causing our city to fall into a desolate state.

The tide has turned, and the people are speaking. We will not accept this any longer.

Please hear us loud and clear. We are organizing.

Thank you,
Camille-Claire Grayson
FORMAL LETTER:

Dear Coucilmembers,
I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

The first public discussion on this topic took place Thursday, October 9th during a NOMA informational zoom meeting. However, it was clear the intention of St. Joseph’s and LA County was to open the facility illegally and without notice, community input. More so, fully formed operational polices or adequate safety measures to protect the surrounding neighborhood were not and have not been presented or Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1913 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 501
accepted.

Personally, I would like to highlight that the elementary school my children attend, Carlthorp School, is located just 0.3 miles from the planned shelter location. In addition to Carlthorp, multiple other preschools and elementary schools in close proximity, educating thousands of elementary-aged students. The potential impact on the safety and well-being of these children and staff members cannot be overstated. It is illegal for anyone on the sex registry to live within a mile of a school and your suggested background check process is not measurable or complete.

It is clear your security plan beyond the shelter is not complete or adequate. The reputation of your owner and “partner” in this facility was highlighted in this LA Times article from last year and details serious safety concerns surrounding another one his projects: https://www.latimes.com/homelesshousing/story/2024-11-05/new-owner-cuts-security-janitors-at-skid-row-homeless-housing-as-tenantsfear-worsening-conditions Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who attend the impacted schools.

Protect our children, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Camille-Claire Grayson
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1914 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 502
Mitchell Kois
From: Kelli Ferrone <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 7:34 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16B Support for Negrete

EXTERNAL
Dear Coucilmembers,
I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

The first public discussion on this topic took place Thursday, October 9th during a NOMA informational zoom meeting. However, it was clear the intention of St. Joseph’s and LA County was to open the facility illegally and without notice, community input. More so, fully formed operational polices or adequate safety measures to protect the surrounding neighborhood were not and have not been presented or accepted.

Personally, I would like to highlight that the elementary school my children attend, Canyon Charter, is located just 0.5 miles from the planned shelter location. That park is a frequent after school hang spot for our children. In addition to Canyon, multiple other preschools and elementary schools in close proximity, educating thousands of elementary-aged students. The potential impact on the safety and well-being of these children and staff members cannot be overstated. It is illegal for anyone on the sex registry to live within a mile of a school and your suggested background check process is not measurable or complete.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1915 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 503
It is clear your security plan beyond the shelter is not complete or adequate. The reputation of your owner and “partner” in this facility was highlighted in this LA Times article from last year and details serious safety concerns surrounding another one his projects: https://www.latimes.com/homelesshousing/story/2024-11-05/new-owner-cuts-security-janitors-at-skid-row-homeless-housing-as-tenantsfear-worsening-conditions Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who attend the impacted schools.

Protect our children, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Kelli Ferrone
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1916 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 504
Mitchell Kois
From: Sara Rehnmark <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 7:26 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16B Support for Negrete

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmembers,
I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

The first public discussion on this topic took place Thursday, October 9th during a NOMA informational zoom meeting. However, it was clear the intention of St. Joseph’s and LA County was to open the facility illegally and without notice, community input. More so, fully formed operational polices or adequate safety measures to protect the surrounding neighborhood were not and have not been presented or accepted.

Furthermore, I am concerned to have learned from St. Joseph’s that individuals in this shelter will not be subject to drug testing or complete background checks, yet they will be permitted to exit and and enter the facility and community freely during the day. This poses significant risks to our community, especially given the proximity of THREE elementary schools, community parks and local residents. Additionally, it was suggested that others looking for homeless services would benefit from outreach being conducted in the surrounding area, effectively putting more homeless, mentally ill and drug addicts in the neighborhood. You are not simply housing 49 people you are a beacon to everyone looking for homeless services.

Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1917 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 505
It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who attend the impacted schools.

Protect our neighborhood, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Sara Rehnmark
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1918 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 506
Mitchell Kois
From: Valerie Amos <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 7:26 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16B support for Negrete

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmembers,
I am wriƟng to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violaƟon of our due process rights.

The first public discussion on this topic took place Thursday, October 9th during a NOMA informaƟonal zoom meeƟng.

Furthermore, I am concerned to have learned from St. Joseph’s that individuals in this shelter will not be subject to drug tesƟng or complete background checks, yet they will be permiƩed to exit and and enter the facility and community freely during the day. This poses significant risks to our community, especially given the proximity of THREE elementary schools, community parks and local residents. AddiƟonally, it was suggested that others looking for homeless services would benefit from outreach being conducted in the surrounding area, effecƟvely puƫng more homeless, mentally ill and drug addicts in the neighborhood. You are not simply housing 49 people you are a beacon to everyone looking for homeless services.

It is clear your security plan beyond the shelter is not complete or adequate. The reputaƟon of your owner and “partner” in this facility has been quesƟoned due to quesƟonable acƟons/decisions operaƟng similar faciliƟes.

Simply accepƟng the risk and responsibility for approving this locaƟon is not acceptable. The introducƟon of such a facility without consideraƟon of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

It is your responsibility to prioriƟze the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who aƩend the impacted schools.

Protect our neighborhood, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Valerie Amos
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1919 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 507
Mitchell Kois
From: Kim DeGeorge <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 6:51 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16B Support for Negrete

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmembers,
I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

The first public discussion on this topic took place Thursday, October 9th during a NOMA informational zoom meeting. However, it was clear the intention of St. Joseph’s and LA County was to open the facility illegally and without notice, community input. More so, fully formed operational polices or adequate safety measures to protect the surrounding neighborhood were not and have not been presented or accepted.

Personally, I would like to highlight that the elementary school my children attend, Carlthorp School, is located just 0.3 miles from the planned shelter location. In addition to Carlthorp, multiple other preschools and elementary schools in close proximity, educating thousands of elementary-aged students. The potential impact on the safety and well-being of these children and staff members cannot be overstated. It is illegal for anyone on the sex registry to live within a mile of a school and your suggested background check process is not measurable or complete.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1920 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 508
It is clear your security plan beyond the shelter is not complete or adequate. The reputation of your owner and “partner” in this facility was highlighted in this LA Times article from last year and details serious safety concerns surrounding another one his projects: https://www.latimes.com/homelesshousing/story/2024-11-05/new-owner-cuts-security-janitors-at-skid-row-homeless-housing-as-tenantsfear-worsening-conditions Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who attend the impacted schools.

Protect our children, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Kim DeGeorge
Get Outlook for iOS
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1921 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 509
Mitchell Kois
From: Ryan Ward <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 6:46 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16B Support for Negrete

EXTERNAL
Dear Coucilmembers,
I am writing to strongly urge you to support item 16B and our legal, due process rights under SB326.

The Good Neighbor Policy requirement (via SB326) was not followed and is a clear violation of our due process rights.

The first public discussion on this topic took place Thursday, October 9th during a NOMA informational zoom meeting. However, it was clear the intention of St. Joseph’s and LA County was to open the facility illegally and without notice, community input. More so, fully formed operational polices or adequate safety measures to protect the surrounding neighborhood were not and have not been presented or accepted.

Personally, I would like to highlight that there are multiple preschools and elementary schools in close proximity, educating thousands of elementary-aged students (including my son in a few years). The potential impact on the safety and well-being of these children and staff members cannot be overstated. It is illegal for anyone on the sex registry to live within a mile of a school and your suggested background check process is not measurable or complete.

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1922 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 510
housing/story/2024-11-05/new-owner-cuts-security-janitors-at-skid-row-homeless-housing-as-tenantsfear-worsening-conditions Simply accepting the risk and responsibility for approving this location is not acceptable. The introduction of such a facility without consideration of our legal, due process rights is dangerous.

It is your responsibility to prioritize the safety of your current community members, especially the many children who attend the impacted schools.

Protect our children, vote yes for item 16B to support transparency and our due process rights.

I look forward to your response and or support for item 16B.

Sincerely,
Ryan Ward
832.385.0641
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1923 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 511
Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2025 6:35 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Paul Song
Subject: Item-16-Negrete

EXTERNAL
As a homeowner in Santa Monica for over 15 years, I am outraged to have learned of the designaƟon of 413 and 825 Ocean Ave. as “acute mental health faciliƟes,” just LAST week and their planned opening THIS month. There are more than a thousand elementary school children who aƩend schools within walking distance to the faciliƟes. Neither Roosevelt, Carlthorp or Canyon Schools have parking for parents, therefore children under 12 are walking everyday to get to schools.

To be springing this on a community without any prior public noƟce or engagement about safety protocols is uƩerly reprehensible. The lack of transparency is why people have totally lost faith in government, especially when it obvious that someone is profiƟng handsomely for this total disregard for the community.

Those suffering from mental illness deserve proper support that includes resources, drug treatment, programming— none of which can be easily accessed in a community where there is nothing around but schools and parks where children and elderly roam.

Members of this council have been aware of this project and neglected to share with the community—including the police department, how to ensure safety when no criminal background checks are required, no drug tesƟng and an open door policy.

If residents can stay 90 days, we are talking about potenƟally hundreds of very sick people cycling through these faciliƟes —only 15 of whom are required to be from Santa Monica. With no resources in the immediate area, what are people going to do?
WHO WILL LIABLE WHEN THERE IS AN INCIDENT?
Santa Monica deserves beƩer than silence and secrecy. We deserved accountability.

Lisa Ling
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1924 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 512
Mitchell Kois
From: Todd Thomson <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2025 9:54 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Todd S. Thomson
Subject: 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue.

EXTERNAL
I strongly object to the current plan to turn these locaƟons into housing for severely mentally ill paƟents. I can’t imagine a worse locaƟon in Santa Monica for such a facility, right across from a heavily trafficked park regularly used by children, elderly, and many Santa Monica residents. There was zero discussion with the community about this plan, and there was clearly a mis-characterizaƟon by the city manager’s department of the zoning required for housing “seriously mentally ill parients”.

This mis-use has been a pure money-grab by the developer as he is gaming the city council, the city, the county and the state to generate more revenue from his property than he would from legiƟmate rentals. Shame on the city council for being so ignorant or naive or corrupt as to not put a stop to this.

Please do your jobs, and find a more appropriate locaƟon for this facility.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1925 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 513
Mitchell Kois
From: Erik Hodge <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2025 9:14 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16B Support for Negrete

EXTERNAL
All -
I’m a concerned Santa Monica resident. I ask that you please review all maƩers pertaining to the development properƟes at 825 and 413 Ocean Ave. I have two small children and live 2 blocks from 825 Ocean. This is project is of deep concern to me.

Please review in the upcoming meeƟng.

Best,
Erik
Erik Hodge
226 Palisades Ave
Santa Monica, CA 90402
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1926 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 514
Mitchell Kois
From: Josh Singer <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2025 8:13 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: item 16b -Negrete

EXTERNAL
We are submitting our objection to the homeless shelter slated to open at 413 ocean avenue for the severely mentally ill.

We have a young child who attends school a thousand feet from the facility -- one of several schools (and preschools) in close walking distance.

As a parent and a constituent, we urge you to support item 16B, and our Due Process rights under SB326.
josh singer
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1927 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 515
Mitchell Kois
From: Lauren Ruvo <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2025 8:09 PM
To: Council Mailbox
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16-Negrete

EXTERNAL
Dear City Council Members,
I have lived in Santa Monica for 6 years and is the city my husband and I have chosen to raise our two sons. We live in the lively North of Montana community and love the neighbors, friends, and general sense of community that has been culƟvated since we moved here. We love that our boys know their neighbors and will grow up with many neighbors as lifelong friends, at least this is our hope. See, we moved to this neighborhood because of its reputaƟon for its reputaƟon for being safe. With the new 49 bed mental health facility for “severely mentally ill individuals” on Ocean Avenue there is great concern for the safety of all families living in Santa Monica. While safety is my top concern, I also, along with many neighbors, can’t help but wonder what will happen to property values when this facility is established on the premier Ocean Avenue? Many of us stretch ourselves thin to live in this neighborhood with our biggest asset being our home. To diminish this by allowing this facility to open in a premier residenƟal neighborhood is a huge mistake that will likely have devastaƟng consequences for the rest of our beauƟful Santa Monica. Residents deserve beƩer than to be blindsided by learning of this opening at the last minute. What will city council do to stop this? And, if it cannot be stopped, what will be done to protect the high level of safety that North of Montana residents have come to expect? With respect,
Lauren Ruvo Carroll, JD
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1928 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 516
Mitchell Kois
From: Paul Dolansky <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2025 6:00 PM
To: Council Mailbox
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16-Negrete

EXTERNAL
I am a long time resident in this neighborhood. I encourage you to vote to oppose St. Joseph Center from putting a facility for severely mentally disabled individuals in the midst of a solely residential neighborhood at 413 Ocean Ave, Santa Monica
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1929 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 517
Mitchell Kois
From: Lee Rosenbaum <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2025 3:13 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Proposed Interim Housing Facility at 413 Ocean Avenue

EXTERNAL
To the Santa Monica City Council:

As a resident of the block where the proposed interim housing facility is located, I fear that my objecƟons to the proposal might smack of NIMBY-ism. I assure you that this is not the case.

At the NOMA Zoom forum on Thursday evening, the following became apparent, either through direct statements from the representaƟves of the L.A. County Department of Mental Health or of St. Joseph’s Center which intends to operate the facility:

1. The project is described by its proponents as housing for people with “acute behavioral health needs”: in other words, people with severe mentally illness. Is this really the right locaƟon for such a facility, across from the largest park in the city on highly desirable ocean-view property?

2. The proponents claim that priority will be given to Santa Monica residents. How does an unhoused person qualify as a “resident” of Santa Monica? Won’t this state priority simply encourage more homeless people to camp out in Palisades Park and other parts of the city?

2. There has been no disclosure – despite being specifically asked – of the success rate of such faciliƟes. They should be touƟng their successes, not hiding from disclosure.

3. There will be no criminal background or substance abuse checks of prospecƟve residents, only a check to see if they are registered sex offenders. This is hardly reassuring.

4. The residents will be free to come and go between 7:00 am and 9:00 pm, but where will they go? There are no shops, community centers, or faciliƟes within easy walking distance of this locaƟon. There is no provision for security in the neighborhood beyond the confines of the building itself, which we are told will have two guards, one at the front and one at the back of the building. There is no provision for addiƟonal security in Palisades Park, which is undoubtedly where many of the residents will spend their days. There are two elementary schools within walking distance of the building, Carlthorp School and Roosevelt Elementary School; parents of students are gravely concerned that their children might be exposed to demonstraƟons of “acute mental health needs” when residents of the facility are freely wandering the neighborhood. Who will be responsible when (not if, but when) something bad happens to a resident or, worse, to a child?

5. The refusal of St. Joseph’s and the DMH to explain the relaƟonship of the building’s owner to this project is disconcerƟng. We have learned from the Zoom chat that he is currently suing the City of Santa Monica over its refusal to grant him permits for some other project(s), and this acƟon on his part appears to be retaliatory.

6. While we have been told that it is impossible to stop this project from going forward, one of the neighborhood residents introduced himself as the owner of many properƟes and said that this proposal is being misrepresented as interim housing when in fact it is a mental health facility, and that this change of use requires permits from the City which have not been sought. This in itself should trigger an invesƟgaƟon by the City AƩorney.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1930 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 518

7. Finally, there must be more transparency from the City as to who knew about this and when. St. Joseph’s claims to have informed city staff in Housing and Human Development about this plan in March. They say that somewhere between three and five city council members were informed. The new city manager claims to have learned about this when he took office in August. So how is it possible that the mayor only learned of this less than two weeks ago? And why was the public not informed of this at any step for the past six months? There is a serious breakdown in communicaƟon here. There must be accountability.

There is no quesƟon that homelessness is a serious problem in Santa Monica and in Los Angeles County. But temporarily housing 29 people (and another 20 in the second property they hope to use later) is hardly going far to solving the problem. Certainly, people with mental illness deserve treatment and respect, but this is simply the wrong place to give it to them.

I urge the City Council to determine what acƟons they might take to stop this from going forward.

Sincerely,
Lee Rosenbaum
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1931 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 519
Mitchell Kois
From: estelle elinson <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2025 2:48 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Item-Negrete

EXTERNAL
Please stop this facility from being completed before more informaƟon and transparency is revealed to the neighborhood.

Estelle Elinson
Sent from my iPhone
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1932 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 520
Mitchell Kois
From: JANE BARTEL <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 1:22 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16-Negrete - Mental Health Facility on Ocean Avenue

EXTERNAL
Dear Santa Monica City Council,
We are wriƟng to let you know that my husband and I strongly oppose the establishment of the two mental health care facilites slated to open at 419 and 825 Ocean Avenue.

The property owner appears to have negoƟated this business deal in a less than transparent manner and the residents living closest to these buildings have been leŌ in the dark unƟl now.

We learned on the zoom call last night that no doctors or health services will be provided at these faciliƟes and that the paƟents will need to be shuƩled to the Valley for treatment. This is illogical.

The lack of proper supervision and secuity are alarming.

The idea that these paƟents will be allowed to wander around the neighborhood unƟl 9pm at night is disturbing.

What will happen when they don’t show up back at the building on Ɵme? We all know what is really going to happen - the paƟents will head over to our beauƟful Palisades Park.

Palisades Park is one of the most iconic parks in California where residents and tourists from all over the city come to enjoy the ocean views, music concerts, picnics, family gatherings - all of the things that this park was created for. They do not come here to be frightened by mentally ill people. There are already enough mentally Ill people in the park.

They are also going to head over to Montana Avenue where they can pan handle and harrass the people dining and shopping.

Montana has just finally found it’s fooƟng again aŌer years of struggle. New businesses and restaurants are opening.

Why would you jeprodize this success?
We are seniors living at 201 Ocean Avenue. There are insane people that scream, walk up to you and yell at you and are generally threatening. It’s scary. We already carry pepper spray.

Surely there is a more appropriate locaƟon for these faciliƟes to be located closer to the actual services that the paƟents require to recover from their illness.

Thank you for your Ɵme and consideraƟon.

Best wishes,
Jane Bartel and Marcus Viscidi
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1933 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 521
Mitchell Kois
From: Jason Marconi <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 9:34 AM
To: Council Mailbox
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16-Negrete - Mental Health Facility on Ocean Ave.

EXTERNAL
Santa Monica City Council and City Manager Chi, I employer you to do everything you can to fight the opening of these facilities. It is time to file a lawsuit against the state and the county. The city of Santa Monica and it's residents do NOT want this facility to open. The city is already in such dire straights. Do you really think that the opening of this facility is going to help us move in the right direction. Take that 30,000 feet view and take a look. Palisades park is going to be a mess and the surrounding area will suffer as well. If i was a tourist I would not consider this a beutiful and safe place. There is a school 0.3 miles from the center, think about the children.

It is time to STOP THIS FACILITY FROM OPENING. I know the city is broke, but it would be better to purchase this facility from the land owner and have it sit empty. The amount of property damage that is about to take place is going to be high.

DO YOUR JOBS AND STOP THIS.

Jason Marconi
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1934 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 522
Mitchell Kois
From: Fredda Jaffe <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2025 7:04 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16-Negrete

EXTERNAL
Very concerned about plans for 413 Ocean Ave. I live on San Vicente and am already concerned with feeling unsafe in our neighborhood from the increase of homeless in Palisades Park. Please advise what safety measures will be taken when needed.

Fredda Jaffe
202 San Vicente Blvd.

Sent from my iPad
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1935 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 523
Mitchell Kois
From: Purchasing <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2025 1:07 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: St. Joseph Center Item 16-Negrete

EXTERNAL
Council Members,
Council Members,
What exactly are you doing to stop St. Joseph Center from putting a facility for severely mentally disabled individuals in the midst of a solely residential neighborhood at 413 Ocean Ave., Santa Monica? Do homeless deserve more rights than tax-paying residents? They have already destroyed the Promenade by scaring away shoppers leaving a ghost town of empty storefronts. They have colonized Reed Park with its needle exchange making it unusable to citizens. Now, if you let them, they will get to destroy another neighborhood and Palisades Park across the street.

I await your response.

Samuel Korn
515 Ocean Ave. SPHA
Santa Monica Ca., 90402
310-883-8280
[email protected]
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1936 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 524
Mitchell Kois
From: Kara Guilfoyle <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2025 12:21 PM
To: Council Mailbox
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16- Negrete

EXTERNAL
Good morning,
I have just heard about the plan to move severely mentally disabled homeless individuals to 413 Ocean Avenue. As a resident of Santa Monica for 13 years, I am HIGHLY AGAINST this decision. The site is incredibly inappropriate for the services being provided. This is a residential area and the one sliver of Santa Monica park that hasn't been completely destroyed by the homeless population.

Most of our local parks are completely unusable for the residents d/t homeless individuals, who have become increasingly more violent and dangerous over the past several years. The promenade has become less and less attractive to tourism, shops can barely stay open, and our city is littered with trash from mentally ill people. Santa Monica has become increasingly unsafe over the decade I have lived here. I have been followed in broad daylight by homeless men. I have witnessed homeless individuals shove, hit, scream, and throw objects at people and vehicles. There are human feces and urine in the streets. Theft from private homes and vehicles is insanely rampant. I personally have been screamed at and stalked by homeless people for doing nothing more than minding my own business, packages and mail stolen regularly, my window of my apartment cut into in a break-in attempt. I can't even walk on Wilshire anymore whatsoever.

The one area I can safely take a walk alone (and only when light out because after dark is absolute no-go anymore) and enjoy a clean and safe space is between San Vicente and Idaho to Ocean and 12th streets.

This decision will absolutely change the safety in those streets.

The decision to house severely mentally ill homeless individuals at this address will be signing a death sentence to what remains of the former Santa Monica reputation. After 13 years here, I have only seen this city care less and less about its residents.

What is the city doing to protect its residents?
--
Kara Guilfoyle, MSN, FNP-BC
(c) 513.312.5819
(e) [email protected]
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1937 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 525
Mitchell Kois
From: Katy MacLeod <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2025 12:18 PM
To: Council Mailbox
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16-Negrete

EXTERNAL
Dear Santa Monica City Council,
Please stop the St. Joseph Center from putting a facility for severely mentally disabled individuals in the peaceful residential neighborhood of 413 Ocean Ave.

The Palisades Park is the only park my family frequents as Reed Park and others in the area have become unsafe due to drug addicted and mentally ill unhoused individuals. My daughter's life was threatened by an individual with schizophrenia (so please do not take "severely mentally ill" lightly). While care must be provided, certainly not in area like 413 Ocean Ave.

I'm so tired of certain City Council members favoring mentally ill drug addicts who threaten the safety of long time taxing paying residents.

Considering the significant financial crisis Santa Monica is facing, why would you allow dangerous individuals in high tourist and high property tax areas? We've already lost the Promenade and Santa Monica Place.

Please exercise your common sense and stop this facility on Ocean Ave.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
Katy MacLeod
(15 yr Santa Monica resident)
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1938 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 526
Mitchell Kois
From: James Gortikov <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2025 9:34 AM
To: Dan Palmer; Council Mailbox
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: RE: Item 16-Negrete: 413 Ocean Ave.

EXTERNAL
I wholeheartedly agree with Mr. Palmer. I am a current resident just around the corner from the proposed facility and have plans to move even closer to the facility in approximately 2 weeks. Should this facility be approved, as an integral part of this neighborhood, the City will encounter extreme resistance as Mr.

Palmer pointed out. Further, our housing values and rental market, for which my company is one of the most dominant property owners in Santa Monica, will be gravely impacted and compromised by the proposed use. Quite frankly, the decision I find unconscionable! Mr. Brock as I am aware lives within immediate proximity of the subject property under discussion. I would welcome his perspectives.

Sincerely,
Jim GorƟkov
President
GorƟkov Enterprises, Inc.

A Real Estate Investment and Development Company
P.O. Box 7096, Santa Monica, CA 90406
jgorƟkov@gorƟkoventerprises.com
C: (818) 535-5434
From: Dan Palmer <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2025 8:50 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Item 16-Negrete: 413 Ocean Ave.

What exactly are you doing to stop the County of Los Angeles and St. Joseph Center from puƫng a facility for severely mentally disabled individuals with total freedom to come-and-go as they please (To buy drugs? To defecate in the park? To squabble?) in the midst of a solely residenƟal neighborhood at 413 Ocean Ave, Santa Monica?
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1939 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 527

Do homeless deserve more rights than law-abiding, tax-paying residents? They have colonized Reed Park (enabled by needle exchange) making it a regular scene for overdoses and de facto unusable to law-abiding people who deserve a safe park. And, the sociopathic severely mentally disabled individuals make Tongva Park dangerous.

My wife regularly walks our dog in Palisades Park, one of the last places available for reasonably safe use – at certain hours. But even before this influx of addiƟonal severely mentally disabled individuals the park is not safe at night, early morning (before 10AM) or aŌer dusk.

With the acquiescence of the City Council, the County is using a quiet residenƟal neighborhood in Santa Monica as a dumping ground for the region's problems. With this ill-considered facility it - if you let them proceed as contemplated – it will destroy Palisades Park across the street, making it into a de facto open air insane asylum.

This proposal – to locate this populaƟon with freedom to spill out unsupervised into the park and surrounding community, deterioraƟng public safety - is insane. The City must take every available procedural and legal opƟon to stop this from moving forward.

Dan Palmer
Santa Monica resident and taxpayer for more than 20 years Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1940 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 528
Mitchell Kois
From: Dan Palmer <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2025 8:50 AM
To: Council Mailbox
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16-Negrete: 413 Ocean Ave.

EXTERNAL
What exactly are you doing to stop the County of Los Angeles and St. Joseph Center from puƫng a facility for severely mentally disabled individuals with total freedom to come-and-go as they please (To buy drugs? To defecate in the park? To squabble?) in the midst of a solely residenƟal neighborhood at 413 Ocean Ave, Santa Monica?
Do homeless deserve more rights than law-abiding, tax-paying residents? They have colonized Reed Park (enabled by needle exchange) making it a regular scene for overdoses and de facto unusable to law-abiding people who deserve a safe park. And, the sociopathic severely mentally disabled individuals make Tongva Park dangerous.

Dan Palmer
Santa Monica resident and taxpayer for more than 20 years Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1941 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 529
Mitchell Kois
From: Stanley H Epstein <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2025 7:43 AM
To: Oliver Chi
Cc: Bruce Leddy; Chip Goodman; John Alle; Phil Brock; Epstein HP; Jeff Segal; Victor Fresco; [email protected]; John Cyrus Smith; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Barry Snell Subject: NOMA meeting-413 Ocean Avenue

EXTERNAL
Dear Mr. City Manager. The NOMA community is anxious to meet you this evening.

My neighbors have huge concerns about the proposed 413 Ocean operaƟon for 48 homeless people with severe mental health problems.

Transparency issues are a major problem. The project has been discussed by St. Joseph’s, the County, State and Developer for more than 2 years, but the Mayor states that the City learned about it a few weeks ago. I am skepƟcal.

Therefore, kindly be prepared to advise the community in detail this evening what you have learned as to knowledge by your predecessor, Council members or staff concerning when they found out about the project, what they learned and what they did. Item 16 Tuesday , which Lana will support but which she unfortunately omiƩed from the Agenda posted last evening, is ridiculous because you and Lana have every right and fiduciary duty to request an invesƟgaƟon and should have.

If this quesƟon and all other related maƩers do not have priority for you, many people will have a big problem.

Sincerely, Stan Epstein. 310 393 7619
Sent from my iPad
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1942 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 530
Mitchell Kois
From: Michelle Darrow <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2025 11:34 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: "Item 16-Negrete"

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed placement of a high-needs facility for severely mentally disabled individuals by St. Joseph Center at 413 Ocean Avenue, a site located squarely within a solely residential neighborhood.

While compassion for the unhoused and mentally ill is essential, City policy must also protect the character, safety, and livability of residential communities. Santa Monica has already shouldered a disproportionate share of the region’s homelessness crisis. The Promenade has suffered significant business closures tied to declining foot traffic and public-safety concerns, and Reed Park has become largely unusable for families—conditions compounded by programs such as the needle exchange. In our immediate area, we are already experiencing vehicle dwelling along Ocean Avenue and Georgina, with little to no visible enforcement or consequences. Adding another high-needs facility steps from Palisades Park risks repeating these patterns, further degrading public spaces and destabilizing nearby blocks.

It appears the County—too often with the City’s acquiescence—is relying on Santa Monica to absorb more than its fair share of regional burdens. I urge the Council to reject this siting and insist on a more equitable distribution of services across Los Angeles County, prioritized for appropriately zoned, nonresidential locations with robust on-site security, clinical staffing, and clear performance and accountability metrics.

Please prioritize the safety, stability, and quality of life of Santa Monica residents in your decisionmaking. At minimum, before any action is taken, the City should:
 Conduct full community outreach and a publicly noticed hearing;  Require a comprehensive impact and safety plan with measurable outcomes; and  Enforce existing rules regarding vehicle dwelling and public nuisance along Ocean Avenue, Georgina, and adjacent streets.

Sincerely,
Michelle Darrow, RN, MSN, FNP
123 Georgina Avenue, Unit 1
SM, CA 90402
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1943 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 531
310-710-9244

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1944 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 532
Mitchell Kois
From: Kyle Miller <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2025 8:00 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16 Negrete

EXTERNAL
Writing to express our disbelief that mentally ill people will be housed on 413 Ocean Avenue. We vehemently disagree with this decision. We truly hope it will be reconsidered as we are certain there is a better solution that does impact the tax paying citizenry of Santa Monica.

Kyle and Michael Miller
1239 19th Street, Apt 11
SM 90404
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1945 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 533
Mitchell Kois
From: Jill Shimmel <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2025 8:23 AM
To: Council Mailbox
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Please stop st Joseph center

EXTERNAL
I just learned about the intended opening of St Joseph Center which will be one block away from our home at 515 Ocean.

It is shocking that this has not been addressed earlier and that the potential concerns have not been discussed with nearby residents.

We implore you to take whatever action possible to put a pause on opening this facility and potentially adding to the further destruction of our once beautiful and safe neighborhood.

Sincerely, Jill and Mark Shimmel, 515 Ocean Avenue
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1946 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 534
Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2025 4:31 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16-Negrete

EXTERNAL
What exactly are our representatives on City Council doing to stop St. Joseph Center from putting a facility for severely mentally disabled individuals in the midst of a solely residential neighborhood at 413 Ocean Ave, Santa Monica? Do homeless deserve more rights than tax-paying residents? They have already destroyed the Promenade by scaring away shoppers leaving a ghost town of empty storefronts; they have colonized Reed Park with its needle exchange making it unusable to citizens. Now, if you let them, they will get to destroy another neighborhood and Palisades Park across the street.

I await your response.

Harriet P. Epstein
310 570 0695
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1947 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 1 Mitchell Kois
From: Carey Kim <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 8:38 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; [email protected] Cc: charles kim; [email protected]
Subject: Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Facilities for the Unhoused with Severe Mental Crises at 413/825 Ocean Ave 10/13/25
The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
RE: Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Facilities for the Unhoused with Severe Mental Crises at 413/825 Ocean Ave Dear Mayor Negrete, Honorable Members of the City Council, and City Manager Chi, I am writing to express my sincerest support for Mayor Negrete who has singlehandedly brought to light the non-transparent nature in which two facilities for the severely mentally ill were approved near schools, senior centers, and parks without any publicly available impact analyses, stakeholder notification, or community input per Welfare & Institutions Code §5604.2(a)(4)). I stand with my fellow Santa Monicans to request a suspension of the facilities at 413 Ocean Ave and 825 Ocean Ave until all six elements in Mayor Negrete’s memo are complete and publicly posted, particularly Item #6, which asks for a citywide comprehensive and transparent site review process for such facilities.

While tonight’s item appears to only be relevant to the two addresses above, this issue has citywide implications as it demonstrates that our city lacks a process to expend taxpayer funds in compliance with state law and the spirit of our City’s Strategic Plan on Homelessness, which require community and professional involvement at every stage. These provisions are designed to guarantee that the voices of those with lived experience of mental illness, along with residents, local businesses, and first responders, are all heard, respected, and accounted for – particularly as our city faces significant financial shortfalls.

The issue is not about opposing care—it is about ensuring that care is delivered responsibly, safely, cost eƯectively, and with dignity for all. The Mayor’s call for coordination between the City, Los Angeles County, and nonprofit providers ensures that these projects will be guided by expertise, empathy, and accountability. The community should be viewed as partners in this endeavor, to help all parties achieve the outcomes that benefit the wellbeing of all, which is one of the stated mission in the City’s Homelessness Strategic Plan.

By calling for clarity on zoning, transparency in developer practices, and robust public outreach, Mayor Negrete is not creating barriers to progress—she is building trust, ensuring that our city’s compassion is matched by competence in every single neighborhood across this city. This approach strengthens our collective ability to help people heal, stabilize, and reintegrate into the community.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1948 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 2 Her leadership reminds us that compassion and accountability are not opposing values—they are inseparable. A community that truly cares about its most vulnerable must also care deeply about how decisions are made, how funds are spent, and how every stakeholder is treated.

I stand in full support of Mayor Negrete’s eƯorts to make Santa Monica a model for both compassionate care and transparent governance. Los Angeles County should not be driving decisions that impact all of our communities without accountability, and thus, we simultaneously call on Third District LA County Supervisor Lindsay Horvath to intervene – to both pause funding for these projects and support Mayor Negrete’s detailed request.

In conclusion, we respectfully request your support for all six requests in Mayor Negrete’s memo and pause the opening of the facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean until all the analyses are posted and shared with the public.

Thank you for your service to our city and for considering this important item.

Sincerely,
Carey Kim
Santa Monica, CA
cc: Third District Los Angeles County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1949 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 3 Mitchell Kois
From: Rita Branch <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 5:01 PM
To: Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete
Cc: Caroline Torosis; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; councilmtgitems
Subject: Ocean Avenue Homeless Housing
Enough is enough! I've watched this City go down hill now for awhile since the train came, but the last 5 years has destroyed the city I have call home now for 25 years. Its unbearable to let my kid walk by himself or ride a bike by himself. What In The world are you guys thinking. This is the last stretch of peace we have left. This town will become like San Francisco it already has on a lower scale unless we fight back and say no no more!! I will fight and I will not allow it anymore. People are waking up now, even the ones that supported this nonsense the NIMBY you have woken up and finally all of us right left in the middle say NO MORE! We all have had enough of this idiotic ways that dont help anyone We will be there tomorrow and we will fight.

Rita Branch
Owner - Secret Room Events
516 San Vicente Blvd
Direct line. 3105008996
Sent from my T-Mobile 5G Device
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1950 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 4 Mitchell Kois
From: Nancy Morse <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 10:31 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis; Oliver Chi
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 16-B - SUPPORT Re: LA County and Nonprofit housing in Santa Monica

EXTERNAL
To: Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 16-B - SUPPORT Re: LA County and Nonprofit housing in Santa Monica From: Nancy Morse
Dear Mayor Negrete, City Councilmembers, and City Manager, I am in support of this measure, and I agree with the items in Mayor Negrete's memo. The county needs to respect the city and its residents.

And the community should be able to have input. While these types of faciliƟes are necessary, they need to be implemented while addressing the concerns of the neighbors.

Sincerely,
Nancy Morse
90404
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1951 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 5 Mitchell Kois
From: Judy Levinthal <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 9:08 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: The Mental Health Facilities planned for 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue

EXTERNAL
I am writing to voice my opposition to the plan of St. Joseph Center and the LA County Dept of Mental Health to open homeless mental health facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue. This plan has been imposed on Santa Monica without adequate notice and input from the residents of Santa Monica and from the city government.

I support item 16B that Mayor Lana Negrete has placed on the agenda.

Sincerely,
Judy Levinthal
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1952 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 6 Mitchell Kois
From: Susan Stangl <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 8:51 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi
Subject: St. Joseph Mental Health Facilities (Item 16B)

EXTERNAL
Dear council members,
I was dismayed to learn that homeless mental health facilities will be opening soon in Santa Monica without an opportunity for residents and citizens to be informed and have a chance to make their concerns known.

As a physician, I have worked with homeless patients both at the Samoshel location (with medical students from UCLA) and at the Downtown Women's center on Skid Row downtown. I also recall some problems with a similar facility on Pico near SMC years ago. This population has a specific set of issues and needs that cannot be met adequately by the type of facilities planned. Like many other residents, I am concerned about adequate staffing and care for the residents as well as their safety and that of the local community. I do not want to be another NIMBY person, but I do think that not everything should exist in every neighborhood. The city of Santa Monica is NOT homogeneous in character, nor should it be.

Also, Palisades Park is a destination for locals, Santa Monica residents from other parts of the city and visitors from the LA area and beyond. Increasing the number of wandering mentally ill residents will hurt that community, scare away visitors and add to the already out of control problem of unhoused persons in our city that is already putting a strain on our resources.

I know we can always "wait and see" what happens and deal with problems as they arise, but I promise you, they will.

Thank you!
Susan Stangl
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1953 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 7 Mitchell Kois
From: Michael Boccella <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 8:33 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request for City Council Direction on Community Engagement, Zoning Clarity, and Accountability for LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects

EXTERNAL
To: Oliver Chi, City Manager
From: Lana Negrete, Mayor
Date: October 9, 2025
Re: Request for City Council Direction on Community Engagement, Zoning Clarity, and Accountability for LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects
Recently, the City was made aware that the LA County Department of Mental Health (DMH), in partnership with St. Joseph Center, intends to establish two Behavioral Health Bridge Housing facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue in Santa Monica. The two properties will collectively serve to facilitate 49 interim housing beds for homeless individuals with severe behavioral health needs. St. Joseph Center will lease and operate the sites, while DMH will fund the services and program oversight through State Behavioral Health Bridge Housing resources.

I want to be clear that I support the intent of establishing these types of facilities, as they are needed pieces of infrastructure to bolster our homelessness response efforts. Further, LA County and St. Joseph Center have indicated that Santa Monica residents will be prioritized for placement, and that the facilities will include 24/7 staffing, on-site clinicians, and security personnel.

With that being said, the community has raised questions regarding possible impacts from this project.

Residents have also expressed frustration over the lack of prior notice or opportunity for public input before funding was approved by LA County and site renovations began.

Given the sensitivity of this matter and the community concerns expressed, I am requesting the following:

1. With respect to outreach related to the facilities on Ocean Avenue, direct that the City Manager coordinate with LA County, St. Joseph Center, and the project developer to ensure broad Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1954 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 8 communication and outreach to both residents and adjacent businesses, including the Oceana (located two doors down from 825 Ocean Avenue) and other nearby stakeholders.

2. Direct that the City Manager work with the County of Los Angeles, relevant nonprofit partners, and project developers to ensure that all proposed supportive, shelter, or transitional housing projects within the City of Santa Monica comply with the intent and requirements of Proposition 1 and the Good Neighbor Policy (SB 326), including the community engagement provision set forth in Welfare and Institutions Code § 5604.2(a)(4), which requires citizen and professional involvement at all stages of the planning process – specifically including community members, business owners, housing, law enforcement, education, and others who interact with individuals living with mental illness on a daily basis.

3. Direct that the City Manager clarify zoning classifications, use types, and building-code provisions applicable to each supportive-service, shelter, and transitional housing type use, including whether such uses are permitted, conditionally permitted, or require discretionary review, and to return with recommendations that ensure that appropriate public notification always occurs to a neighborhood when such a project is being officially proposed.

4. Direct that the City Manager clearly define for the public the land use regulations that allow the facilities on Ocean to operate without needing to obtain a discretionary City permit. Along those lines, this work effort should include identification of what constitutes a mental-health facility, a transitional housing facility, an emergency shelter, and a supportive housing facility, and those details should be developed into a citywide communication strategy to inform the public about details related to these types of operations. That communications strategy should include: (1) an accessible webpage containing a comprehensive project FAQ detailing purpose, population served, staffing, hours of operation, and oversight; (2) a designated hotline or contact person for residents and businesses to report nuisances or concerns; and (3) clear response protocols and follow-up mechanisms.

5. Direct that staff attempt to obtain from LA County verification with respect to the Ocean facility developer’s goals, operational record, and legal standing, in addition to how much LA County is paying the developer, and confirming that any developer or property owner involved in these projects is in good standing and not engaged in active litigation with the City or related public entities.

6. Please place this item on the October 14 agenda for full City Council consideration.

7. Finally, direct that the City Manager conduct a retrospective review of similar existing or recently approved projects – including those located in Sunset Park and the Pico Neighborhood – to determine whether proper community engagement and communication occurred, and, where lacking, to implement corrective measures and ensure that appropriate neighborhood contact and support systems are now in place.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1955 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 9 Michael Boccella
[email protected]
(917) 319-8714
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1956 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 10 Mitchell Kois
From: Kelli <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 7:33 AM
To: Lana Negrete; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Council Mailbox Subject: Item 16-Negrete

EXTERNAL
Subject: Support for Item 16-Negrete – Immediate Pause on 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue Projects Dear Mayor and Councilmembers,
I strongly urge the Council to support Item 16 from Councilmember Negrete and immediately pause occupancy at 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue until there is:
 Full transparency,
 Proper zoning clarification, and
 Meaningful community engagement.

These projects have moved forward with inadequate public oversight and without sufficient answers to residents' legitimate concerns. I respectfully request the Council take the following actions:

1. Ensure Broad Community Outreach
Direct the City Manager to work with LA County, St. Joseph Center, and the property owner to conduct robust outreach to nearby residents, businesses, and schools, ensuring they are fully informed and have a voice in the process.

2. Clarify Zoning and Use Regulations
Clearly explain the zoning classifications, use types, and building code provisions that govern these facilities. Going forward, require public notification and input before similar projects are approved or implemented.

3. Improve Transparency and Communication
Disclose the regulations that allow these sites to operate without City-issued permits. Establish a public communication plan that includes:
 An accessible FAQ,
 A designated hotline, and
 Clear response protocols for community concerns.

4. Verify Developer’s Legal and Operational Standing
Require full transparency from the developer and service provider by verifying:
 Operational history,
 Legal standing,
 Payments received from LA County, and
 Whether they are in good standing and free from litigation with the City.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1957 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 11 5. Review Past Projects for Accountability
Conduct a retrospective review of similar housing and shelter projects in Santa Monica to ensure that public engagement, safety, and accountability have been consistently upheld.

6. Disclose Key Program Details
Publish the County Department of Mental Health (DMH) contract, staffing plan, and licensing status. Host a public meeting to present:
 Staff credentials,
 Incident reporting protocols, and
 Resident screening criteria.

7. Develop a Citywide Safety and Oversight Plan
Establish a citywide plan that addresses:
 Neighborhood safety,
 Cost oversight, and
 Due process protections for residents and business owners.

In summary, these facilities should not begin operations until the community has clarity and confidence in their management, oversight, and legal compliance. I urge you to support Item 16 and take the necessary steps to protect both the integrity of our city’s planning process and the well-being of all residents.

Thank you,
Kelli Urode
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1958 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 12 Mitchell Kois
From: Diane Bakst <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 1:14 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Cc: ICE Tommaso Zanobini
Subject: Objections to mental health facilities on Ocean Avenue

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor, City Council Members and City Manager of Santa Monica, We are writing to express deep concerns over the mental health facilities that are to open imminently at 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue. We have been residents at 301 Ocean Avenue for several years and know the exact blocks of these facilities very well.

We are OBJECT for multiple reasons and would like to register our objections as part of the City Council’s discussions on this matter:
1) It is outrageous that these uses are allowed on Ocean Avenue, and if allowed, it is negligent that NO resident input was solicited prior to these plans being unveiled and foisted upon the neighbors. As we live a few doors down, why were we not notified or asked for input before this was presented as a “done deal”?
2) The homeless/unhoused population in Santa Monica is indeed a problem for those experiencing it, as well as for taxpaying neighbors like us who must confront the unhoused population daily. We absolutely support the need for comprehensive treatment such as outlined by St. Joseph’s. That said, we do not agree that these locations are appropriate.
3) We chose Ocean Avenue for its unparalleled ocean views and peacefulness. We take daily walks and runs in Palisades Park and use the stairs/ramps to the beach. This public gem has been tarnished by years of unhoused people sleeping, walking around unclothed, yelling/disrupting the peace, and using/gathering around the bathrooms. This has made it unpleasant and dangerous for other residents to access certain stretches of the park, pathways, stairs and bathrooms— services that we, taxpayers, fund each year and cannot fully enjoy.

It is already outrageous that this public park has been diminished for so long, and now we are going to add potentially MORE severely mentally ill people to this area?? This is a BAD plan for the neighbors. 4) Many other LA residents and tourists make their way to Ocean Avenue daily to enjoy the sunsets and peace from city life. Concentrating/adding more mentally ill people will impact perceptions of safety and damage Santa Monica’s draw for tourists. Even the proposed “security guards” at the designated entrances/exits is an intrusive and off-putting presence in the otherwise quiet, residential area.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1959 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 13 5) We have been investing in Santa Monica and this project makes us doubt our real estate and business interests in the city. With these high taxes, diminished public facilities and the lack of regard for our input/concerns on this matter, we are reconsidering if we can continue to invest here.

Sincerely,
Diane Bakst and Tommaso Zanobini
301 Ocean Avenue
#220
Santa Monica, CA 90402
E-mail: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1960 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 14 Mitchell Kois
From: Craigshep <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 12:05 AM
To: [email protected]; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; [email protected]; [email protected]; Jesse Zwick; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Lana Negrete; [email protected]; Barry Snell; Dan Hall; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: REAL STORY OF PROPOSED BRIDGE HOUSING AT 413 and 825 OCEAN? A $4M DEVELOPER SUBSIDY AND BENEFIT TO OUT OF TOWN OWNER w/CA TAXES?

EXTERNAL
Bourne Financial Group potential litigation re fraud….
https://klaymantoskes.com/investigations/bourne-seniors-housing-funds-investor-loss-investigation/ Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

On Monday, October 13th, 2025 at 11:42 PM, Craigshep <[email protected]> wrote:

Real Story of 413 Ocean and 825 Ocean
Proposed Bridge Housing?

1. The two sites under much discussion the past two weeks are not owned by developer Leo Pustilnikov. They are owned by Bourne Financial Group https:Bournefg.com/portfolio/ via an LLC that has the same mailing address “BFG Santa Monica Propco, LLC” https://www.bizprofile.net/fl/winter-park/bfg-santa-monica-propco

2. Leo P has a Master Lease with an Option agreement where he controls the sites under his LLC “Hope for Samo”, in turn leases the sites to St. Joseph’s, then gets to use County (taxpayer) funds to pay his option rent, and thus gives him time to entitle the site to develop them site into something else.

Here is his LLC
https://www.bizprofile.net/ca/beverly-hills/hope-for-samo-llc Here are screenshots from the recorded documents backing up my notes above… Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1961 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 15 Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1962 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 16 Signature page showing true owner. I am sure since he is in Winter Park FL he cares a lot about Santa Monica and the immediate neighborhood.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1963 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 17 Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1964 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 18 Leo’s option agreement…
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1965 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 19 Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1966 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 20 The City Council and LA County seem like they should be answering a LOT more questions about this. Who on the city council has accepted donations from this developer? I wonder if he is donating to Lindsey Horvath? No due process for Santa Monica residents about this project. No notice as required under Prop 1 “Community Support” guidelines. No specifics of the parameters of the proposed use other than a rushed, vague, inconsistent 6 slide discussion from St. Joseph’s.

Taxpayers deserve answers and citizens deserve better.

Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1967 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 21 Mitchell Kois
From: Craigshep <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 11:43 PM
To: [email protected]; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; [email protected]; [email protected]; Jesse Zwick; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Lana Negrete; [email protected]; Barry Snell; Dan Hall; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: REAL STORY OF PROPOSED BRIDGE HOUSING AT 413 and 825 OCEAN? A $4M DEVELOPER SUBSIDY AND BENEFIT TO OUT OF TOWN OWNER w/CA TAXES? Attachments: image.png

EXTERNAL
Real Story of 413 Ocean and 825 Ocean
Proposed Bridge Housing?

1. The two sites under much discussion the past two weeks are not owned by developer Leo Pustilnikov. They are owned by Bourne Financial Group https:Bournefg.com/portfolio/ via an LLC that has the same mailing address “BFG Santa Monica Propco, LLC”
https://www.bizprofile.net/fl/winter-park/bfg-santa-monica-propco

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1968 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 22 Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1969 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 23 Signature page showing true owner. I am sure since he is in Winter Park FL he cares a lot about Santa Monica and the immediate neighborhood.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1970 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 24 Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1971 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 25 Leo’s option agreement…
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1972 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 26 Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1973 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 27 The City Council and LA County seem like they should be answering a LOT more questions about this. Who on the city council has accepted donations from this developer? I wonder if he is donating to Lindsey Horvath? No due process for Santa Monica residents about this project. No notice as required under Prop 1 “Community Support” guidelines. No specifics of the parameters of the proposed use other than a rushed, vague, inconsistent 6 slide discussion from St. Joseph’s.

Taxpayers deserve answers and citizens deserve better.

Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1974 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1975 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 28 Mitchell Kois
From: Noma Boardmember <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 9:36 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 Item 16-B - OPPOSE MENTAL HEALTH TREATMENT FACILITY IN NOMA

EXTERNAL
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.

Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,
The Board of NOMA strongly supports our community's concerns and our community’s strong opposition to the facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue.

They are poorly conceived, thrust on our neighborhood without any notice or a chance for community input, and represent a potential danger to all of us.

Seriously mentally ill people — who will not be screened for drug use or prior criminal records — will be brought into our neighborhoods, close to elementary schools, and across from a park where children play, and the seniors take their walks.

It also appears individuals at these facilities will be allowed out — unsupervised — from 7am to 9pm, including after dark. The only requirement is that they are not registered sex offenders and that they are seriously mentally ill. Facility residents could include people convicted of violent crimes, abuse to women, children, or the elderly.

We support facilities that help the seriously mentally ill and homeless. More are needed. But this model and its location is ill-conceived and without regard Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1976 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 29 for community safety. It will lead to a reduction of public support for these services and a further erosion of confidence in our public officials, both at the County level and in Santa Monica.

On short notice about 300 Santa Monicans attended a Zoom meeting NOMA held this past Thursday. At least four City Council members, including the Mayor, were present as was our City Manager. The opposition was vocal and passionate; all who spoke were against placing these facilities in this neighborhood. This issue is not going away.

The City Council should be proactive in carrying out the specific requests we set out below.

NOMA supports this 16B item and specifically requests:

1. Legal Review: The City Attorney be directed to carry out as a high priority a full and thorough review (or re-review) of all legal options Santa Monica has to challenge this facility. These should include, without limitation, all arguments (a) that this facility is a “mental health facility” and not “supportive housing” as the facilities contend and which would result in their not qualifying for automatic approval, and (b) that there was a failure to provide the community with their legal right to be timely heard under SB326 and Welfare and Institutions Code §5604.2(a)(4), We urge that the City Attorney reach out to those who have expressed a desire to sue or have hired legal counsel so that the City can benefit from their legal analysis. The City Attorney should promptly report back to the Council all legal options.

2. Inspections and Enforcement: The applicable City departments should be directed to carry out a thorough review, including inspections, of compliance with all applicable City codes and laws at these facilities.

Residents have pointed out that codes have been strictly applied to their homes and businesses and they expect nothing less here.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1977 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 30 3. Taking Responsibility: The public should be told why neither the County nor the City informed residents of these projects until after they had been approved. Both need to come clean so residents can understand how and why they were not included in a process that will so dramatically affect their lives.

Who knew what and when, and what they did about it, should be part of this inquiry. Who from the City, if anyone, visited the properties and when. NOMA first learned of these projects only two weeks ago from Mayor Lana Negrete’s weekly newsletter.

4. Request the County Pause These Projects and Review: Finally, but importantly, the City Council should contact the LA County Dept. Of Mental Health and Supervisor Horvath and insist that they pause these projects while the County reviews the very flawed process involved, the law, and the appropriateness of placing these facilities in a residential neighborhood with the protocols discussed above.

Sincerely yours,
The Board of the North of Montana Association (NOMA)
smnoma.org
[email protected]
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1978 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 31 Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 9:01 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Request to Pause Approvals for the Mental Health Facilities 413/825 Ocean Ave in Santa Monica and Require a New Process that Follows State Law and the City's Strategic Plan, Using the Item 16-B Memo as a Framework

EXTERNAL
Dear Supervisor Horvath, Mayor Negrete, Honorable Members of the City Council, and City Manager Chi, I am wriƟng to express concern about the County’s non-transparent process in which two faciliƟes for the severely mentally ill and unhoused were approved in our city near schools, senior centers, and parks without any publicly available impact analyses, stakeholder noƟficaƟon, or community input per Welfare & InsƟtuƟons Code §5604.2(a)(4)).

According to the LA County Department of Mental Health, there are no background checks or sobriety requirements at this facility, which allows for voluntary entry/exit without any plan for care, supervision, or enforcement once an individual leaves the premises. I stand with my fellow Santa Monicans to request the County work with the City of Santa Monica to suspend approvals for the faciliƟes at 413 Ocean Ave and 825 Ocean Ave and to launch a new process that is in compliance with all laws governing public parƟcipaƟon, and that address the six elements in Mayor Negrete’s memo (hƩps://santamonicacityca.iqm2.com/CiƟzens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=4&ID=19244&MeeƟngID=1454).

Our community supports compassionate, accountable care that promotes the well-being of the enƟre city and county.

While this leƩer appears to only be relevant to the two addresses above, this issue has citywide implicaƟons as it demonstrates that our county and city lack a process to expend taxpayer funds in compliance with state law and the spirit of our City’s Strategic Plan on Homelessness, which require community and professional involvement at every stage. These provisions are designed to guarantee that the voices of those with lived experience of mental illness, along with residents, local businesses, and first responders, are all heard with a mission for success – parƟcularly as our city faces significant financial shorƞalls.

The County should not be able to fund and approve faciliƟes in our city without following proper noƟficaƟon and input required, per state law. The community should be viewed as partners in this endeavor, to help all parƟes achieve the outcomes that benefit the wellbeing of all, which is one of the stated missions in the City’s Homelessness Strategic Plan. The County and City must work collaboraƟvely with stakeholders across our enƟre city – including those from Sunset Park, Pico Blvd, and the Palisades Park Community – to ensure transparency, collaboraƟon, and accountability.

In conclusion, we respecƞully request that you pause the opening of the faciliƟes at 413 and 825 Ocean, reopen the approvals and analysis of these projects, and support the compleƟon of all six points in Mayor Negrete’s memo associated with Item 16-B. Thank you to Mayor Negrete for bringing this important issue to our aƩenƟon, and to all of you for your service to our city and for considering this important item.

Sincerely,
Ron Harari
Landlord of 801 Wilshire Blvd and 2665 Main St and AYSO Santa Monica Head Coach Ron Harari
President & CEO
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1979 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 32 Tova Capital, Inc.
10456 Lindbrook Dr.

Los Angeles, CA 90024
T: (310) 341-0876
M: (310) 591-4532
[email protected]
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1980 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 33 Mitchell Kois
From: Max Friedman <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 8:20 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Request to Pause Approvals for the Mental Health Facilities 413/825 Ocean Ave in Santa Monica and Require a New Process that Follows State Law and the City’s Strategic Plan, Using the Item 16-B Memo as a Framework

EXTERNAL
Dear Supervisor Horvath, Mayor Negrete, Honorable Members of the City Council, and City Manager Chi, I am writing to express concern about the County’s non-transparent process in which two facilities for the severely mentally ill and unhoused were approved in our city near schools, senior centers, and parks without any publicly available impact analyses, stakeholder notification, or community input per Welfare & Institutions Code §5604.2(a)(4)). According to the LA County Department of Mental Health, there are no background checks or sobriety requirements at this facility, which allows for voluntary entry/exit without any plan for care, supervision, or enforcement once an individual leaves the premises. I stand with my fellow Santa Monicans to request the County work with the City of Santa Monica to suspend approvals for the facilities at 413 Ocean Ave and 825 Ocean Ave and to launch a new process that is in compliance with all laws governing public participation, and that address the six elements in Mayor Negrete’s memo
(https://santamonicacityca.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=4&ID=19244&MeetingID=1454).

Our community supports compassionate, accountable care that promotes the well-being of the entire city and county. While this letter appears to only be relevant to the two addresses above, this issue has citywide implications as it demonstrates that our county and city lack a process to expend taxpayer funds in compliance with state law and the spirit of our City’s Strategic Plan on Homelessness, which require community and professional involvement at every stage. These provisions are designed to guarantee that the voices of those with lived experience of mental illness, along with residents, local businesses, and first responders, are all heard with a mission for success – particularly as our city faces significant financial shortfalls.

The County should not be able to fund and approve facilities in our city without following proper notification and input required, per state law. The community should be viewed as partners in this endeavor, to help all parties achieve the outcomes that benefit the wellbeing of all, which is one of the stated missions in the City’s Homelessness Strategic Plan. The County and City must work collaboratively with stakeholders across our entire city – including those from Sunset Park, Pico Blvd, and the Palisades Park Community – to ensure transparency, collaboration, and accountability.

In conclusion, we respectfully request that you pause the opening of the facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean, reopen the approvals and analysis of these projects, and support the completion of all six points in Mayor Negrete’s memo associated with Item 16-B. Thank you to Mayor Negrete for bringing this important issue to our attention, and to all of you for your service to our city and for considering this important item.

Sincerely,
Max Friedman
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1981 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 34 The Wilmont Neighborhood
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1982 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 35 Mitchell Kois
From: Zac Baldwin <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 7:13 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Agenda Item Commentary Request to DENY (minimally delay until proper public discourse is conducted) Opening of Shelters for the Severely Mentally Ill at 413/825 Ocean Ave

EXTERNAL
Mayor Negrete, City Manager Chi, and
Members of the City Council,
I write to express my strong opposition to the above mentioned facilities.

The process in which approvals and funding were secured for two mental health facilities that completely preempted the city of Santa Monica’s leadership leaves one thinking: which of our city’s leaders are actually paying attention to what is occurring WITHIN OUR CITY? As a Santa Monican, I can NOT do squat on any piece of land within the limits of the city without a permit. HOW did these facilities get renovated WITHOUT THE EXPRESS KNOWLEDGE OF OUR CITY LEADERS? If these facilities are catching the council flat footed, it’s fair to say that ZERO due diligence has been performed.

How is it The People of Santa Monica are to be at the whim of Los Angeles county in order to foist upon our city severely mentally ill people requiring no background checks or sobriety requirements (per a statement made by the LA County Department of Mental Health during a community town hall conducted on Thursday, October 9th). While VERY LATE, I do appreciate Mayor Negrete’s recent memo requesting transparency, community engagement, and accountability regarding the facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue.

Common sense dictates that projects supporting severely mentally ill people having rights to come and go as they choose SHOULD NOT BE anywhere near senior facilities, preschools, elementary schools, small businesses, residents, tourists, hotels, parks, Santa Monica’s chief economy of tourism (generating millions in tax revenue supporting our essential services), — all within a half-mile radius. The idea that installation of such a facility, risking GREAT potential WITHOUT full public input, clear information, thoughtful consideration of available citywide resources (e.g., law enforcement, fire and rescue services, etc.), neighborhood safety, tourism,and existing financial stresses perplexes the mind. City leadership should have grave concerns over negligence lawsuits generated should this installation actually occur. Without the rigor of full impact/environmental study of the potential fallout, our city and Los Angeles County may have even graver legal concerns. And rightfully, injured parties may also Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1983 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 36 consider pursuing legal endeavors that entertain personal capacity. On the very good chance that Santa Monica law is being pre-empted, legal matters will ensue.

Our city is already under significant financial stress, and we must ensure that every funding decision protects our broader economic health. We WILL NOT be able to serve ANY vulnerable souls if we cannot maintain our financials.

Negrete’s call for transparency, zoning clarity, and proper community engagement is the only proper path forward and ignored by either her or people in her staff. The action of building these facilities without permits is outrageous and illegal. Our fair city is organized by Charter giving a weighted voice to The People of Santa Monica. The entire Council should support efforts to bring accountability and balance to this incoming disaster – and minimally pause the opening of these facilities until all due diligence has been conducted, public hearings have been held, AND the public’s desires influence the final outcome. I’d bet big money, after transparency, the ability to install such facilities will evaporate like dew in the sun.

The community-centric measures outlined in the City of Santa Monica’s Homelessness Strategic Plan calls for transparency stating the effort to be: “Transparent… We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community.” We can clearly observe failure on this point. The mission statement goes further to “promote the wellbeing of all”. And here’s the second noted failure as regards 413/825 Ocean Avenue. THE ONLY WAY this Homelessness Strategic Plan "serves the well being of all" will be TO NOT INSTALL the facility in the presently proposed locations.

And finally, it is clear the City of Santa Monica is hostage to ‘managed decline’. Since 2016, the face of the entire city has changed. This is by purposeful design to birth a 15 minute city, despite many declarations of ignorance while failing to serve The People of Santa Monica. At this point, the actions and words rarely collide making the less than transparent city plan cast a mighty shadow (meaning, average people can see through the nonsense). Conduct yourselves accordingly.

Best,
Melanie Wise
Santa Monican
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1984 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 37 Mitchell Kois
From: Matt Goldenberg D.O. <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 6:44 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 16-B - OPPOSE MENTAL HEALTH TREATMENT FACILITY IN NOMA

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,

I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed homeless shelter/mental health facility on Ocean Ave.

There were 300 or more people, including many Santa Monica city council members, at the recent NOMA zoom meeting and there was wide and vocal opposition to this location. Everyone supports finding housing for those who are unhoused and providing treatment for individuals with mental health and substance use disorders. However, the location is NOT acceptable.

Our children and our families are STRONGLY opposed to putting a mental health and drug treatment program in our residential community, across the street from one of the only parks in NOMA and within

0.5 miles of three elementary schools.

Please do everything possible to find an alternative location for this facility.

Thank you,
Matt Goldenberg
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1985 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 38 Mitchell Kois
From: Ellie Farbstein <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 5:15 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Oliver Chi; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Council meeting item 16B

EXTERNAL
Dear council members
I am a very longƟme resident and voter in NOMA part of Santa Monica. I fully support all of the proposals put forth in ITEM 16B.

I am against the opening of the mental health faciliƟes on Ocean Ave and believe them to be illegal for the zoning without special permits.

Listen to the folks whom you represent please.

Sincerely
Ellen Farbstein
Sent from my liƩle iPhone
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1986 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 39 Mitchell Kois
From: Dina Klausner <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 5:12 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; [email protected]; [email protected]; Council Mailbox Subject: Re: Request to Suspend Approval and Funding of Facilities 413 & 825 Ocean Ave

EXTERNAL
The Honorable Lindsey P. Horvath
Los Angeles County Supervisor, Third District
500 West Temple Street, Room 866
Los Angeles, CA 90012
[Sent via
email: [email protected]; [email protected]; lana.negrete@santam onica.gov; [email protected]; [email protected]; Dan.Hall@santam onica.gov; [email protected]; [email protected]; Natalya.Zernitskaya@s antamonica.gov; [email protected]]
Re: Request to Suspend Approval and Funding of Facilities413 & 825 Ocean Ave in Santa Monica, CA Due to Noncompliance with State Law and City Plans

Dear Supervisor Horvath,
I am writing to express my deep concern and disappointment over the manner in which your office and the Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health advanced funding and approvals for the voluntary entry/exit facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue for the unhoused and severely mentally ill without prior public notice or community engagement.

Residents were blindsided, left to discover this project through rumor rather than proper notification. This was not a clerical error—it was a profound failure of transparency.

The Mayor’s memo further highlights that the County and its nonprofit partners neglected to comply with Welfare and Institutions Code §5604.2(a)(4), which explicitly requires citizen and professional involvement at all stages of the planning process. That includes residents, local businesses, schools, and those directly impacted by such facilities. None of these stakeholders were given that opportunity.

Instead, this project was quietly advanced without consideration of the preschools, elementary schools, senior living facilities, and impacts on the city’s tourism hub that generates millions in revenue for a city already under fiscal strain. The secrecy surrounding this process has eroded public trust and undermined the very principles of open governance you have publicly championed.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1987 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 40 While your office and St. Joseph Center’s newly released FAQ attempts to assure the public that the site will provide “24/7 staffing” and “enhanced security,” it is evident there is no coordinated plan to provide safety beyond the walls of these facilities, as discussed at the October 9th Town Hall, where your office, the LA County DMH, and St. Joseph’s presented. Transparency after the fact is not transparency—it’s damage control.

Supervisor Horvath, the people of Santa Monica are not opposed to providing mental health care or supportive housing. We are opposed to being cut out of decisions that so profoundly affect our children, elderly, neighborhoods, schools, small businesses, safety, and economic stability. You owe this community an explanation and must put a pause to the opening of these facilities until proper due diligence is completed in a public forum that is in compliance withthe law.

We urge you to pause the opening of the mental health facilities at 413 Ocean Avenue and 825 Ocean Avenue, and launch an investigation into the approach that was taken to approve these facilities, vendors, and sites until a full review is conducted with full transparency and meaningful public engagement.

Sincerely,
Dina Klausner
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1988 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 41 Mitchell Kois
From: Erika Shay <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 4:43 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16-Negrete

EXTERNAL
Dear Councilmembers and Neighborhood Representatives,
I write in absolute opposition to locating a mental-health supportive housing facility at 413 and 429 Ocean Avenue. As someone who lives at 201 Ocean Avenue, I will myself and others be placed at real risk. The asserted safety improvements touted by proponents are speculative; many credible studies suggest the opposite is plausible — particularly in a dense urban neighborhood with high street activity and limited buffer zones.

Below are the reasons why crime is very likely to increase and why this proposal should be rejected outright.

Why crime will likely skyrocket
Empirical evidence of crime increases around similar facilities A study of emergency winter shelters in Vancouver found a 56% increase in property crime within 100 m of an opened shelter (theft, vandalism) compared to when the shelter was closed.

That same study noted that crime impact is highly localized to within ~400 meters (2–3 block radius).

Although not exactly the same as a full-time supportive housing facility, these results show how proximity shelters can attract opportunistic crime.

In other settings of homeless shelters, business owners and neighbors have reported unintended negative spillover: increased loitering, petty theft, drug-use paraphernalia depositing, and safety concerns. (E.g. reports around navigation centers in Vancouver).

Thus, installing such a facility in a densely mixed-residential corridor provides fertile ground for crime “hotspotting” — especially at night, when guard supervision is lower and perimeter control is harder.

Routine Activity theory / criminology logic
Theory supports the notion that increased opportunities + decreased guardianship lead to more crime.

When you bring in a vulnerable population, some with histories of substance use, mental health crises, or prior criminal justice contact, the likelihood of incidents (drug dealing, trespass, disorderly behavior, confrontations) rises. The more transient or loosely monitored the population, the greater that risk.

If internal security is lax, poorly staffed, or reactive rather than proactive, the facility becomes a magnet for external criminal actors (drug suppliers, opportunists) who exploit vulnerabilities. In effect, you’re importing crimes of opportunity, not just accommodating a “stable” group.

Evidence is mixed — we cannot assume “no harm”
Supporters often point to studies that show neutral or negligible crime change after supportive housing (e.g. Been et al. 2008 found no statistically significant uptick in NYC neighborhoods). But those studies typically involve lower-acuity, rigorously monitored projects, often in denser metro contexts with more police presence and buffer populations. They are not analogous to a high-intensity mental-health facility in a narrow, high-foot-traffic corridor adjacent to residential homes.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1989 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 42 Moreover, many academic reviews state that limited research exists on how high-acuity, lower-barrier housing (for persons with serious mental health or substance-use histories) affects crime, especially in local neighborhoods.

Hence, proponents rely on weak “no effect” conclusions — but we are not in a position to gamble on worst-case externalities.

Safety for women and vulnerable neighbors is especially at risk As a woman, my fear is not abstract. Panic, harassment, confrontations, late-night break-ins, disorder — these escalate quickly in transitional populations and under-resourced security.

When security is stretched, patrols may lag, and external public areas adjacent to the facility may become staging points for illicit behavior that preys on passersby — especially in low-visibility hours.

That is not paranoia; it is the predictable consequence of mixing high-risk operations next to residential zones.

Oppose it entirely, not “with conditions”
Given the elevated risk, this proposal should be flatly rejected at this location. No amount of “conditions,” “oversight,” or “staffing guarantees” can fully eliminate danger when the surrounding environment is ill-suited.

If the City insists on pursuing supportive housing, do it somewhere else — a location with:

Wider setbacks from residential streets
Proximity to service hubs, medical infrastructure, and police support Fewer children’s walk routes and fewer pedestrians going by late at night Further from schools
But here, among tightly built housing fronts on Ocean Avenue, a facility is a wrong fit.

Alternative use: serve elderly fire victims to align with zoning The property is zoned for elderly housing. If the City must repurpose, it should prioritize elderly homeowners in our community whose homes were destroyed by the Palisades fire or those who cannot afford to rebuild.

This alternative serves those who are less risky, more stable, and critically in need of housing. It would be far less burdensome to manage and would align with neighborhood character.

Final statement
I completely reject placing a mental-health housing facility at or near 201 Ocean Avenue.

The risk of crime escalation, especially in our immediate environment, is too high to justify.

If the City wants to help, it must find another site—not in our residential corridor—and must prioritize fire-ruined elderly residents who deserve compassion, not new risks to our families.

Please record this opposition in the official file, confirm receipt, and notify me of any hearings. I will show up and speak against it.

Best,
Erika Shay
Sources:
https://www.santamonica.gov/crime-statistics
https://www.santamonica.gov/topic-explainers/crime-reports-and-statistics https://www.neighborhoodscout.com/ca/santa-monica/crime https://www.areavibes.com/santa+monica-ca/crime
https://smdp.com
https://ucr.fbi.gov
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1990 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 43 https://www.crimemapping.com
https://furmancenter.org/files/publications/A3ImpactofSHonNeighborhoods_000.pdf https://crim.sas.upenn.edu/sites/default/files/Ridgeway_Effect%20of%20Emergency%20Sheltersv5_1.2.2018.pdf https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6659163
This email contains information which may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive communications on behalf of the addressee), you may not use, copy, re-transmit, or disclose to anyone this email or any information contained in or attached to this email. If you have received this email in error, please advise the sender by reply email and immediately delete the email.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1991 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 44 Mitchell Kois
From: San Vicente Villas <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 4:42 PM
To: Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete
Cc: Caroline Torosis; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; councilmtgitems
Subject: Ocean Avenue Homeless Housing

EXTERNAL
To the Mayor, City Manager, and Members of the City Council, I strongly oppose the proposed placement of homeless facilities in our neighborhood. This plan is ill-conceived and deeply concerning. Our community already faces increased crime and vagrancy since 2020, and introducing such a facility here would only worsen these issues.

Residents in this area contribute among the highest property taxes in the City, and we deserve responsible, balanced urban planning. There are numerous vacant or underutilized commercial properties along Wilshire and Santa Monica Boulevards that would be far more appropriate locations for such a facility.

Why, then, is oceanfront property—directly across from one of the few clean and peaceful sections of Palisades Park—being targeted for this purpose? It defies both logic and fairness.

We implore you, as our elected representatives, to reject this plan and protect the character, safety, and livability of our neighborhood.

Respectfully,
Bettina Kaplan
San Vicente Blvd, Santa Monica, CA 90402
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1992 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 45 Mitchell Kois
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 4:33 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Subject: SM City Council Meeting - 10/14/2025 - Item 16B

EXTERNAL
It is extremely disturbing that we are only learning of the plan for opening of two supportive housing facilities for the severely mentally ill on Ocean avenue when they are within weeks of opening. While I agree that we desperately need facilities to deal with mentally ill homeless people, it is ridiculous that they are being put in a residential neighborhood near a K-12 school and businesses and a beautiful park that caters to tourists. Hearing that these facilities are not licensed for mental health care and what scrutiny comes from that and that residents will be free to come and go during the day is impossible to understand.

Based on comments made by county oƯicials, it seems that some Santa Monica city oƯicials were informed of this and decided to keep it secret as, it seems, the names of those people are being kept secret. The community has been kept in the dark and It feels like something is “rotten in the state of Denmark”.

Please take whatever action is necessary to uncover and correct what went wrong here. For the future of our city, we need to preserve welcoming and safe environments for residents, children, schools, businesses, and tourists.

Mentally ill people cannot be allowed to roam freely in our neighborhoods. This isn’t fair for them or for us or for the future of our community.

Thank you for your attention to this.

Cathy Tryon
30 year resident of Santa Monica
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1993 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 46 Mitchell Kois
From: Jay Sloofman <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 4:25 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Adrian McMeans; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Proposed Homeless/Mental Health Facility 413/425 Ocean Ave

EXTERNAL
The opening of a homeless shelter for individuals with mental illness at 413/425 Ocean Avenue in Santa Monica is a disasterious idea for the community. The proposed locaƟon is alarmingly at the heart of residenƟal neighborhoods, an elementary school, and Palisades Park. This proximity raises safety concerns for all, especially children and elderly residents.

The proposed site is near a protected green space that serves as a vital ecological and recreaƟonal asset for the community. This facility will negaƟvely impact the safety and enjoyment of the area.

I urge the decision-makers to consider alternaƟve sites that are beƩer suited for a homeless/mental illness facility.

LocaƟons further from dense residenƟal areas and sensiƟve environmental zones should be prioriƟzed.

While the establishment of a facility like this is undoubtedly essenƟal, it is crucial to choose a locaƟon that respects the needs and concerns of the community it serves.

H. Jay Sloofman
516 San Vicente Blvd.

Unit 307
Santa Monica, CA 90402
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1994 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 47 Mitchell Kois
From: Jon Farzam <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 4:22 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; [email protected] Subject: RE: Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Facilities for the Unhoused with Severe Mental Crises at 413/825 Ocean Ave

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete, Honorable Members of the City Council, and City Manager Chi, I am writing to express my sincerest support for Mayor Negrete who has singlehandedly brought to light the non-transparent nature in which two facilities for the severely mentally ill were approved near schools, senior centers, and parks without any publicly available impact analyses, stakeholder notification, or community input per Welfare & Institutions Code §5604.2(a)(4)). I stand with my fellow Santa Monicans to request a suspension of the facilities at 413 Ocean Ave and 825 Ocean Ave until all six elements in Mayor Negrete’s memo are complete and publicly posted, particularly Item #6, which asks for a citywide comprehensive and transparent site review process for such facilities.

The issue is not about opposing care—it is about ensuring that care is delivered responsibly, safely, cost effectively, and with dignity for all. The Mayor’s call for coordination between the City, Los Angeles County, and nonprofit providers ensures that these projects will be guided by expertise, empathy, and accountability. The community should be viewed as partners in this endeavor, to help all parties achieve the outcomes that benefit the wellbeing of all, which is one of the stated mission in the City’s Homelessness Strategic Plan.

Her leadership reminds us that compassion and accountability are not opposing values—they are inseparable. A community that truly cares about its most vulnerable must also care deeply about how decisions are made, how funds are spent, and how every stakeholder is treated.

I stand in full support of Mayor Negrete’s efforts to make Santa Monica a model for both compassionate care and transparent governance. Los Angeles County should not be driving decisions that impact all of our communities without accountability, and thus, we simultaneously call on Third District LA County Supervisor Lindsay Horvath to intervene – to both pause funding for these projects and support Mayor Negrete’s detailed request.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1995 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 48 In conclusion, we respectfully request your support for all six requests in Mayor Negrete’s memo and pause the opening of the facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean until all the analyses are posted and shared with the public. Thank you for your service to our city and for considering this important item.
cc: Third District Los Angeles County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath Sincerely,
Jon Farzam
Chief Executive Officer
Shore Hotel | Santa Monica Hotel | Ocean View Hotel
D 310.656.4530
E [email protected]
A 1515 Ocean Ave. Santa Monica, CA 90401
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.

Shore Hotel Logo
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.

Santa Monica Hotel Logo
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.

Ocean View Hotel Logo
PURSUANT TO 18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTIONS 2510-2521 ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS PRIVACY ACT THIS TRANSMISSION CONTAINS INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED

RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISCLOSURE, PHOTOCOPYING OR DISTRIBUTION OF THESE CONTENTS IS UNAUTHORIZED AND PROHIBITED BY LAW. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS IN ERROR, NOTIFY THE SENDER IMMEDIATELY AND DESTROY ALL COPIES THEREIN! Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1996 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 49 Mitchell Kois
From: Catherine Enderton <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 4:07 PM
To: Oliver Chi; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell
Subject: Mental Health Facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue

EXTERNAL
I'm a long time resident of Santa Monica living near this proposed project. I strongly object to the locations of the mental health housing facilities.

The locations are across from most popular park in Santa Monica which residents and tourists used to enjoy and still try to enjoy. The project encourages mentally ill people to be in close proximity to many children, elderly and tourists. Since they are severely mentally ill the chances of problem behaviors is very high. The people managing them will try to prevent potentially traumatizing incidents from occurring but they have no ability to prevent the mentally ill residents from using the park, being around the children, elderly and tourists.

I feel it's too risky. A better location should be found.

Catherine Enderton, Ph.D.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1997 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 1 Mitchell Kois
From: Ben Delbick <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 11:57 AM
To: Council Mailbox
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Pause Approvals for the Mental Health Facilities 413/825 Ocean Ave in Santa Monica and Require a New Process that Follows State Law and the City’s Strategic Pl Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

Sincerely,
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1998 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 2 Ben Delbick
Sawtelle
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 1999 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 3 Mitchell Kois
From: Thea Phillips <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 11:51 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Oliver Chi; Council Mailbox Subject: Item 16 - Mental Health Facility on Ocean ave
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
I oppose the properties at 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue being used as mental housing facilities, especially considering the history of the owner, Pustilnikov, and his shady businesses dealings. If it is true that this area is zoned residential and therefore cannot legally provide on-site medical or psychiatric care, meaning no doctors, no nurses, and no therapists then this is not a true treatment facility, but just housing with security guards, with the ability for the patients to come and go as they please. This is not how we should be treating the mentally challenged. Please do what you can to stop this owner from causing a nightmare for our residents, police force, and medical responders.

Thank you,
Thea Phillips
310.387.5661
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 2000 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 4 Mitchell Kois
From: Bonnie BlueSkies <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 11:48 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Oliver Chi; Jesse Zwick
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Mental health facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
To: Santa Monica City Council
cc: Mayor Lana Negrete
Re: Homeless Mental Health Facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue, Santa Monica I have been a Santa Monica resident for more than 40 years.

I have lived in the North of Montana neighborhood for more than 30 years.

I attended the NOMA meeting last week and learned about the above issue. I’m baffled that the City government appears to be surprised that the facility is so far along—and that we, who live in this neighborhood, were not consulted or informed. What a shining example of Santa Monica’s apparent dysfunctional government.

The City of Santa Monica has already proven its willingness to ignore mental illness, at great cost to all of our citizens. How much of our collective tax money has been spent on trying to financially heal people who were permanently damaged by Uller, a Santa Monica-sponsored pedophile? $230 million? With more to be paid in the future? And how do these payments affect the rest of our city? I am speechless that you are willing to go down this road again.

It’s horrific enough that numerous people tried to bring the danger of the pedophile to the City of Santa Monica and were dismissed. It is horrific that it was allowed to go on so long—for decades.

The City of Santa Monica is now internationally famous for ignoring pedophilia. News articles about it have circulated all over the world. An abundance of detailed information is available to anyone on the internet. If I had known about this, I would not have bought my house in Santa Monica in 1995.

I certainly would not have come to Santa Monica as a tourist.

And I would never have raised a child here. Absolutely not.

It is an outrage to every citizen in Santa Monica and beyond that you are willing to now approve placing a facility for mentally ill people in that particular location—where in one minute, a facility resident can do staggering damage to an individual, a group, and torpedo our entire city—again.

This isn’t rocket science, people.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 2001 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 5 I have always loved Santa Monica, and I have given a great deal of time and money to our public schools. I’ve been happy and proud to do so. I was floored when I recently discovered the negligence of city officials who should have been paying attention and earning our trust. You can’t expect the people of Santa Monica to keep supporting you and paying our taxes when you are so thoughtless about our safety.

Please note that my objection is not about a halfway house for drug/alcohol addiction nor is it about housing the homeless. It is about housing mentally ill people in an area populated by children.

I promise that if this is approved, I will not vote for any of you again. I will also make sure that others are aware of your irresponsibility with regard to mental illness and our children. And I am unequivocably a lifelong democrat.

Your job is to make Santa Monica safe. And you are failing miserably.

Surely you know that pedophilia is in the national and international spotlight right now. If people were not aware of it, Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell made sure that everyone in Santa Monica knows about it now. Placing a mental health facility in that particular location is outrageous.

I urge you to take whatever measures are necessary to move the facility to a place that is not frequented by children.

You know better.

We all do.

Respectfully,
Bonnie Verburg
[email protected]
NOMA resident since 1995
Santa Monica resident since 1979
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 2002 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 6 Mitchell Kois
From: Lilly Wilen <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 11:48 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Santa Monica City Manager's Office Subject: Council agenda item 16B
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear City Council,
I recently became aware that LA County and St. Joseph Center intend to establish mental health housing and treatment facilities at 825 and 413 Ocean Avenue in the next month or so.

This announcement was shared with the community only a few days ago, leaving residents with very limited time to understand the plans and their potential implications.

Such a significant development warrants open communication and meaningful community engagement well in advance. It’s troubling that this information was not provided earlier, giving the impression that public input is not being valued.

I respectfully ask the Santa Monica City Council to do whatever is in its power (including making a direct appeal to LA County) to pause implementation of these projects to allow sufficient time for the community to review the details, express perspectives, and thoughtfully prepare for the changes that may affect our neighborhood and Palisades Park, which is right across the street.

Thank you,
Lilly Wilen
[email protected]
Santa Monica resident
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 2003 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 7 Mitchell Kois
From: Elizabeth Lerer <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 11:42 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall
Cc: Oliver Chi
Subject: Item 16.B. PAUSE Ocean Ave Facility.

Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and Council Members,
I support our Mayor’s request and ask that you act NOW to learn more before people are moved into 413 & 825 Ocean Ave.

Thank you,
Elizabeth Lerer
Resident
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 2004 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 8 Mitchell Kois
From: Jaqlyn Flesch <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 11:35 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Keep Our Children Safe in Santa Monica
Attachments: 413_825 Ocean Ave Letter to County Supervisor Horvath.pdf Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
--
Jaqlyn G. Flesch
Associate Marriage Family Therapist (IMF97887)
Yoga & Meditation Instructor
Holistic Health Consultant
Phone: 845-893-4774
Email: [email protected]
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 2005 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) [Date]
The Honorable Lindsey P. Horvath
Los Angeles County Supervisor, Third District
500 West Temple Street, Room 866
Los Angeles, CA 90012
[Sent via email: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]] Re: Request to Suspend Approval and Funding of Facilities 413 & 825 Ocean Ave in Santa Monica, CA Due to Noncompliance with State Law and City Plans Dear Supervisor Horvath,
I am writing to express my deep concern and disappointment over the manner in which your office and the Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health advanced funding and approvals for the voluntary entry/exit facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean Avenue for the unhoused and severely mentally ill without prior public notice or community engagement.

As City of Santa Monica Mayor Lana Negrete made clear in her October 9, 2025 memo to the Santa Monica City Manager, even the City of Santa Monica was “recently made aware” of the County’s actions after funding had been approved and renovations were already underway. Residents were blindsided, left to discover this project through rumor rather than proper notification. This was not a clerical error—it was a profound failure of transparency.

While your office and St. Joseph Center’s newly released FAQ attempts to assure the public that the site will provide “24/7 staffing” and “enhanced security,” it is evident there is no coordinated plan to provide safety beyond the walls of these facilities, as discussed at the October 9th Town Hall, where your office, the LA County DMH, and St. Joseph’s presented. Transparency after the fact is not transparency—it’s damage control.

In addition, on page 5 of the City of Santa Monica’s Homelessness Strategic Plan one of the first stated values of the plan is to be transparent. I quote: “Transparent. We strive to communicate clearly and openly, sharing our intentions, decisions, and results to foster the trust of our community.” The mission Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 2006 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) statement of the strategic plan also claims to “promote the wellbeing of all”, but that clearly was not followed as we have outlined.

Sincerely,
[Your Name]
[Your Address or Neighborhood]
[Optional: Email / Phone]
cc: City of Santa Monica Mayor Lana Negrete
City Council Members, City of Santa Monica
Oliver Chi, City Manager, City of Santa Monica
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 2007 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 9 Mitchell Kois
From: Hannah Wilen <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 11:36 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Santa Monica City Manager's Office; Council Mailbox Subject: Council agenda item 16.B.

Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear Santa Monica City Council,
I understand that LA County and St. Joseph Center will be placing mental health housing and treatment facilities at 825 and 413 Ocean Avenue in the very near future.

The community was only informed about this a few days ago.

It is simply not enough time for the community to discuss, voice our opinion, and prepare. It is improper for the county to have kept this information from us.

Please urge the county to delay the creation of these centers for a period long enough for the community to react by reviewing the plans, voicing opinions, and making other arrangements to prepare for the impact on our community and the park across the street.

Thank you,
Hannah Wilen
Resident of Santa Monica
[email protected]
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 2008 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 10 Mitchell Kois
From: Barry Wilen <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 11:20 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Santa Monica City Manager's Office Subject: Agenda item 16.B. - New Mental Health Facilities on Ocean Avenue Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Dear City Council,
Please take action to try to pause the implementation of the two mental heath faculties to be placed at the above addresses in Santa Monica.

The city of Santa Monica, its residents, and its businesses were only made aware of the plans for these facilities a few days ago. We need an appropriate amount of time to allow for review of the plans. If such facilities are implemented, we must assess the impact on our community and prepare accordingly.

Please urge the county or take any other available city action to delay the opening of these facilities to give the community a chance to review the plans, express opinions, make security and other recommendations, and take any other action as they see fit.

Thank you,
Barry Wilen, M.D.

Santa Monica resident
[email protected]
424-234-3764
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 2009 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 11 Mitchell Kois
From: Anne Saldo <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 10:53 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: City Council 10/14 item 11-D - OPPOSE Covenant and Ordinance Changing the Zoning of 2644 30th St.

Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged

EXTERNAL
Honorable Councilmembers,
We respectfully urge you to a) reject the 10-year deed restriction limiting only housing development at 2644 30th Street, b) oppose the ordinance upzoning of 2644 30th Street from residential to commercial, and c) instruct Staff to return with rescission of the LUCE amendment.

The proposed 10-year restriction on developing housing projects is merely a short-term reprieve for the low-rise residential neighborhood, and it offers no protection against commercial activity, which our General Plan specifically limits to the boulevards.

Proceeding sets a dangerous precedent, opening floodgates for upzoning throughout all residential neighborhoods, eroding residents’ trust in local government, and further exhausting our already strained city resources.

Sincerely,
Anne & Gerald Saldo
1004 Wilson Pl
SM CA 90405
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 2010 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 1 Mitchell Kois
From: Barbara Eskowitz <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 4:50 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Facilities for the Unhoused with Severe Mental Crises at 413/825 Ocean Ave

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete, City Manager Chi, and Honorable Members of the City Council, I am writing to express my opposition to the process in which the facilities for the severely mentally ill were approved with taxpayer funds at 413 and 825 Ocean Ave.

I also share my heartfelt support for Mayor Lana Negrete’s leadership in addressing one of the most complex and sensitive challenges facing our community—how best to care for individuals living with severe mental illness and homelessness, while ensuring that our policies remain transparent, inclusive, and grounded in sound public process.

Mayor Negrete’s October 9 memorandum reflects a thoughtful and compassionate approach to public service. Her acknowledgment of the urgent need for behavioral health housing, coupled with her insistence on due diligence, community engagement, and transparency, embodies the balanced leadership Santa Monica deserves.

This issue is not about opposing care—it is about ensuring that care is delivered responsibly, safely, and with dignity for those it is meant to serve. The Mayor’s call for coordination between the City, Los Angeles County, and nonprofit providers ensures that these projects will be guided by expertise, empathy, and accountability.

Her emphasis on compliance with Welfare & Institutions Code §5604.2(a)(4))—which require citizen and professional involvement at every stage of planning—honors both the spirit and the letter of these laws. These provisions are designed to guarantee that the voices of those with lived experience of mental illness, along with residents, local businesses, and first responders, are all heard and respected. Given the facilities’ close proximity to several senior living facilities, preschools, and elementary schools, the lack of a general community safety plan and/or early notification is grossly negligent.

By calling for clarity on zoning, transparency in developer practices, and robust public outreach, Mayor Negrete is not creating barriers to progress—she is building trust, ensuring that our city’s compassion is matched by competence. This approach strengthens our collective ability to help people heal, stabilize, and reintegrate into the community.

I stand in full support of Mayor Negrete’s efforts to make Santa Monica a model for both compassionate care and transparent governance.

As such, we hope you support all six requests in Mayor Negrete’s memo and pause the opening of the facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean until all the analyses are posted and shared with the public.

Thank you for your service to our city and for considering this important item.

Sincerely,
Barbara Eskowitz
North of Montana
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 2011 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 2 Mitchell Kois
From: Jim Barnett <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 4:17 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Letter Supporting Mayor's Actions
Attachments: City of SM - Item 16-B - Support for Mayor .pdf

EXTERNAL
Attached please find a letter regarding the Mayor's actions.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 2012 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) October 14, 2025
The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
[Sent via email: [email protected]; [email protected]] RE: Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Facilities for the Unhoused with Severe Mental Crises at 413/825 Ocean Ave Dear Mayor Negrete, City Manager Chi, and Honorable Members of the City Council, I am writing to express my opposition to the process in which the facilities for the severely mentally ill were approved with taxpayer funds at 413 and 825 Ocean Ave.

By calling for clarity on zoning, transparency in developer practices, and robust public outreach, Mayor Negrete is not creating barriers to progress—she is building trust, ensuring that our city’s compassion is matched by competence. This approach strengthens our collective ability to help people heal, stabilize, and reintegrate into the community.

I stand in full support of Mayor Negrete’s efforts to make Santa Monica a model for both compassionate care and transparent governance.

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 2013 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) As such, we hope you support all six requests in Mayor Negrete’s memo and pause the opening of the facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean until all the analyses are posted and shared with the public.

Thank you for your service to our city and for considering this important item.

Sincerely,
James Barnett
701 Ocean Avenue
Santa Monica, CA
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 2014 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 3 Mitchell Kois
From: Nancy Stone <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 4:16 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Mental health facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean Ave

EXTERNAL
Please don’t allow these facilities in this neighborhood.

Nancy Stone
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 2015 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 4 Mitchell Kois
From: Zach Friedland <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 4:09 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; [email protected] Subject: Support for Mayor Negrete’s Agenda Item 16 and a Request to Delay Opening of Facilities for the Unhoused with Severe Mental Crises at 413/825 Ocean Ave

Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 2016 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 5 In conclusion, we respectfully request your support for all six requests in Mayor Negrete’s memo and pause the opening of the facilities at 413 and 825 Ocean until all the analyses are posted and shared with the public. Thank you for your service to our city and for considering this important item.

Sincerely,
Zach Friedland
Resident & Parent of Children in nearby school
cc: Third District Los Angeles County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath --
Zach Friedland
[email protected]
(646) 339-3165
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 2017 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 6 Mitchell Kois
From: Planning Commission Comments
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 2:55 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: FW: STOP BUILDING IN OCEAN PARK
-----Original Message-----
From: Planning <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 1:16 PM
To: Planning Commission Comments <[email protected]> Subject: FW: STOP BUILDING IN OCEAN PARK
-----Original Message-----
From: Robyn Nissim <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 6:00 PM
To: Planning <[email protected]>
Subject: STOP BUILDING IN OCEAN PARK

EXTERNAL
Please shut this down. Ocean park is crowded enough and the last thing we need is more buildings and mulƟdweling units. You are destroying the neighborhood and contribuƟng to over crowding.

Stop building here. Stop pretending you’re creaƟng something affordable. You’re just destroying the neighborhood and have built enough in Santa Monica.

When is this going to end?!
Where is the data that shows we need more housing? There a thousands of empty units throughout Santa Monica. This is the last thing we need.

Robyn Nissim
A disgruntled tax paying homeowner
Please excuse typos, this message was sent from my iPhone 긕긖긗긘긙긔긚 Item 16-B
October 14, 2025
Item 16-B
October 14, 2025

16.B.b
Packet Pg. 2018 Attachment: Written Comment [Revision 2] (7359 : Mayor Negrete: LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects) 7 Mitchell Kois
From: Rachael Martin <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 2:36 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16B Support for Negrete