Upland City Council
September 22, 2025

Table 5-2: Proposed Bicycle Facilities Ranked by Priority MILE
RANK STREET FACILITY TYPE OF NEW
FROM FACILITY
ini (MILES)
Class Ill Bicycle Route,
1 Arrow Highway Claremont San Antonio Class II Bicycle Lane, 2.40 Boulevard Avenue Class IIB Buffered Bicycle
Lane
2 llth Street Monte Vista Hospital Class Ill Bicycle Route 3.58 Avenue Parkway
3 Foothill Boulevard Western City Grove Avenue Class IV Separated 4.08 limit Bikeway
4 8th Street Benson Eastern City Class III Bicycle Route, 2.32 Avenue limit Class II Bicycle Lane
Class II Bicycle Lane,
5 Mountain Avenue Mountain Lane 7th Street Class IIB Buffered Bicycle 4.08 Lane
6 9th Street Central Grove Avenue Class III Bicycle Route, 3.50 Avenue Class II Bicycle Lane
Class III Bicycle Route,
7 San Antonio Avenue 23rd Street 7th Street Class IV Separated 4.01 Bikeway, Class I Multi-Use
Path
Class IV Separated
8 Euclid Avenue 24th Street 7th Street Bikeway, Class I Multi-use 4.26 Path
Hospital Parkway/ Class Ill Bicycle Route,
Foothill Pacific Electric Class IV Separated
9 Memorial Park/lath Boulevard Trail Bikeway, Class I Multi-use 0.72 Avenue Path
Class II Bicycle Lane,
10 16th Street/Baseline Western City 2nd Avenue Class IV Separated 1.81 Road limit Bikeway
1— San Antonio Creek
u.

Channel (western
ix t Northern City Pacific Electric
G 11 city limit and then Class I Multi-use Path 4.35 Zit east of Monte Vista limit Trail
Z Avenue)
T.

C Class II Bicycle Lane,
E 12 Benson Avenue Mountain Burlington Class IV Separated 3.34 Avenue Street Bikeway
o City Limit
2 (Between
13 Monte Vista Avenue Claremont Pacific Electric Class IV Separated 0.97 o Boulevard Trail Bikeway
and Foothill
-o Boulevard)
c Ti
D
174 Page 519 of 707

BETWEEN MILES
RANK STREET FACILITY TYPE OF NEW
FROM TO FACILITY
(MILES
r.

Existing Class I
14 Cucamonga Creek 20th Street path along the Class I Multi-use Path 0.89 Trail Extension northeastern
city limit
15 15th Street Benson Campus Class Ill Bicycle Route 2.25 Avenue Avenue
16 13th Street Benson Campus Class II Bicycle Lane 2.26 Avenue Avenue
19th Avenue
(-395 ft. east
Mountain of Sunkist Class Ill Bicycle Route,
17 19th Street Avenue Street,where Class IIB Buffered Bicycle 1.57 existing Class Lane
II Bicycle Lane
begins)
18 18th Street Benson City limit Class Ill Bicycle Route 2.13 Avenue
1st Avenue D Street 7th Street Class IV Separated 0.66 Bikeway
19 Class III Bicycle Route,
Class II Bicycle Lane,
2nd Avenue 19th Street 7th Street Class IV Separated 2.75 Bikeway
Class II Bicycle Lane,
20 Campus Avenue 24th Street 13th Street Class IIB Buffered Bicycle 2.78 Lane
21 14th Street Benson Grove Avenue Class Ill Bicycle Route 2.97 Avenue
22 A Street Euclid Avenue Campus Class Ill Bicycle Route 0.55 Avenue
Utility Corridor 1
23 (along Campus 24th Street 19th Street Class I Multi-use Path 1.29 Avenue)
19th Street
24 Utility Corridor 2 19th Street/3rd (-170 ft.from Class I Multi-use Path 0.36 co Avenue Campus o
Avenue) .a
0 Foothill Class IIB Buffered Bicycle a) 25 Grove Avenue Boulevard 8th Street Lane 0.97 E
Mountain Campus Class III Bicycle Route, E
26 20th Street Avenue Avenue Class II Bicycle Lane 1.540 r
Total 62.4
i5
a
0 0

5.6 PRIORITY PROJECTS
Planning-level conceptual drawings and high-level cost estimates were developed for Y2-mile to 1-mile segments of ten priority projects to streamline future funding pursuits and project implementation. The priority projects shown in Table 5-3 and Figure 5-17 were selected for several reasons,including their role in providing connections to schools,parks,and commercial destinations; their need for safety improvement; and their importance to the community. The following section summarizes the bicycle facilities, pedestrian and ADA enhancements, and traffic calming measures proposed to facilitate safe and comfortable active transportation along key corridors. More detailed planning-level conceptual drawings are provided in Appendix D. As the City secures funding and initiates project implementation, projects will be integrated into the City's Capital Improvement Program, which is updated each year in the Annual Adopted Budget and posted on the City's website.

Table 5-3: Priority Projects
PROJECT STREET LENGTH
NUMBER FROM (MILES)
© 1 Arrow Highway Claremont Boulevard Grove Avenue 4.25 2 11th Street Monte Vista Avenue Hospital Parkway 3.58 3 Foothill Boulevard Western City Limit Grove Avenue 4.08 0 4 8th Street Benson Avenue Eastern City Limit 2.32 5 Mountain Avenue Mountain Lane 7th Street 4.08 00 6 9th Street Central Avenue Grove Avenue 3.50 7 San Antonio Avenue 23rd Street 7th Street 4.01 00 8 Euclid Avenue 24th Street 7th Street 4.26 9 Memorial Park/13th Avenue Foothill Boulevard Pacific Electric Trail 0.72 10 16th Street/Baseline Road City Limit Tanglewood Avenue 3.97 '11-
Projects in Progress
Certain segments within and adjacent to the priority projects in Table 5-3 have been identified by the City as high priority due to their proximity to Downtown Upland, the Upland Trail Station, and planned affordable housing development projects. The City has already secured grant funding u.
for the design and/or construction of these projects (shown in black in Figure 5-17):
aStowell Street (from Euclid Ave.to Sultana Ave.): Sidewalk, Class I multi-use path or other bicycle facility, and other improvements.

T. 1st Avenue and 2nd Avenue(from Stowell St.to 7th St.):Wayfinding signage and traffic study a for one-way couplet conversion on 1st Avenue and 2nd Avenue to create space for one-way c bicycle facilities.
a) 7th Street(from Euclid Ave.to 2nd Ave.):Wayfinding signage and a Class IV separated bike- o way or other bicycle facility.
2 2nd Avenue (from Stowell St.to A St.),A Street (from 2nd Ave.to 1st Ave.),and 1st Avenue (between A St.and D St.): Class IV separated bikeway or other bicycle facility, bicycle/pedes- o trian connection to Pacific Electric Trail, enhanced crossing at A Street/1st Avenue, upgraded rail crossingwith bicycle/pedestrian features, and other improvements. safety p
A Street(from 2nd Ave.to Campus Ave.),Campus Avenue(from A St.to Arrow Hwy.),and Arrow Highway(from Campus Ave.to 9th Ave.): Class IV separated bikeway or other bicy- cle facility, bicycle/pedestrian connection to Pacific Electric Trail, traffic signal modifications, wayfinding signage, and other improvements.
176 Page 521 of 707

At
San Antonio
Heights
Lu.
3R0
a
LOS ANGELES zisT Rancho
Cucamonga
COUNTY
20TH ���
�r -�— Jam._ rills U - M- •
19TH
•
MI 78TH ii■
7TH
J
`.� tc'ST •
IZLAI
I.:TH
rZ
Claremont Q
Izt 1;iTH I.
co
3 gg. PDOTHIL■L 3
„7 1H 2
� J
Li .4c
ce cn 9
z 1 ■n low 8 7
C
a
C 7 ..:H
z 6 z 6 ei
— m F
4 a 8561 4 —:
" I
■
___ mmormis I
Montclair
Ontario
Figure 5-17: Priority Projects &Conceptual Design Segments Top 10 Priority Projects Bicycle and Pedestrian School Collision Park
Conceptual Design Segment Density r' City Boundary High
Source:

Projects in Progress Low Parks&Schools:City of Upland Collisions:Transportation Injury Mapping
System,2012-2022
0 0.5 1 Kilo 522 o 0
I I I

Arrow Highway Project Length

4.25 miles
OEntire Project: Claremont Boulevard to Grove Avenue
Conceptual Design Segment: Euclid Avenue to Campus Avenue

EXISTING CONDITIONS
Arrow Highway is a 2-lane to 4-lane secondary i L T I t - - - 1 arterial that runs east to west with a posted / �f' �1r"� speed limit of 25 to 40 mph. Arrow highway t L E >Elltl�i II. . ‘ connects to major corridors that run north to .E.7 icemrsmi._ south, such as Mountain Avenue, San Antonio 21 . 'u' =`is , irdiAlikLnnrm�iin
Avenue,and Euclid Avenue.It contains a variety rr 1liLIh IIiiifi111111L " , of residential, retail, restaurant, office, service, ' MINE1C 1-:RJ111 i71r► industrial, school, and entertainment uses. �I'�9- IFI " ' ' ' ti
The corridor has 13 bus stops, a center turn S€IF411LaLf'1111111a�3al� lif /
lane in some segments, and is controlled by 6FIla3"WI gi Ills EE'o1.- I 14 signalized intersections. On-street parallel /- MIIIMEMEIMENn"ilmaliil: �,I parking ispermitted intermittentlythroughout ���IC-IlitilEllinll Y p g g ..m.. - !Ea3i l ii a -
the corridor, with parking prohibited in many - 1 - , -_ INFOOMLINam ■I—I areas. A Class III bicycle route exists along the i "Irriiii I`-EELI I-- entire corridor.

Entire Project
• •
RECOMMENDATIONS I I Conceptual Design Segment
Recommendations are visualized in the Con-
ceptual Design Segment and can be applied
throughout the corridor as appropriate.
► New bicycle facilities and enhancements AT A GLANCE (i.e., Class II bicycle lanes, Class III bicy-
cle route, speed limit reduction, pavement , _' markings, signage, and traffic calming) , ...,,,• ► Install Class II/IIB bicycle lanes (from Clare- *11 VI , mont Boulevard to San Antonio Avenue)
Schools Parks
► Enhance existing Class III bicycle route with
signage, pavement markings, and traffic
calming measures (from San Antonio Ave- diu42 '�'! 'i nue to Grove Avenue) ,,r, ,
# 40 .
► Traffic calming measures(i.e.,speed cushions,
4 speed feedback signs,and curb extensions) Pedestrian Bicycle cg
o ► Intersection improvements (i.e., hardened Collisions Collisions centerlines, signage, and high-visibility
z crosswalk markings
T.
c ► ADA improvements (i.e., ADA-compliant PROPOSED CONDITIONS E curb ramps, Pedestrian Push Buttons (PPBs),
a) and bus stops)
o ► Bus stop amenities (i.e., shelters and trash .
2 receptacles) ,
1::
�= ► Maintenance (i.e., street tree maintenance) . o
Note:This priority project is adjacent to a project in \I\ :: . • ..
c progress on the following streets:
o
Ti Street (from 2nd Ave. to Campus Ave.), __ D ampus Avenue (from A St.to Arrow Hwy.),and
rrow Highway(from Campus Ave.to 9th Ave.)
178 Page 523 of 707

9 Conceptual Design Segment: Arrow Highway from Euclid Avenue to Campus Avenue Upgrade existing Q Install bus shelter and g ' -' • 4.E. J� signalized intersection trash receptacles IL.' with high visibility at bus stop and 1/.1I/• ti I.• +r.;•i y �' �;crosswalks,'Keep bring stop into ADA ❑ IIt -
Clear'pavement compliance.OmniTrans u.w '' •_,,, marking,and coordination needed. ' >; • _ hardened centerline.

Realign curb ramps
with crosswalks. Fl . •
I, %-014.ilick1.11i4fe
Upland Junior
• • • Enhance existing Install bus shelter and High School • Class Ill bicycle trash receptacles
F I? route by reducing at bus stop and
speed limit to 30 bring stop into
n mph or lower(per SB ADA compliance. __ 5�i I OmniTrans
��iiI ;:� .� � 1216)and installing " sharrow pavement coordination needed.
"* = markings and'Share
' '~*, I E• I•i"' the Road'signage.
"" Upgrade existing
Restripe pavement signalized intersection Upland markings,add a with'Left Turn Yield on Elementary centerline,and a stop N 1s Ave Green'signage and School bar. _ hardened centerlines.

Realign north-west
i,.• 0 curb ramp with
' crosswalks.

Upgrade existing • ;I• ti
signalized intersection - .'_ _ _ _' 1 Replace(2)non 1 5t1,Ave byrealigning curb ADA Pedestrian Push
g gT.� `} il
Buttons(PPBs)per "
ramps with crosswalks
�- —ice} •,►: .�
and adding hardened Traffic Signal Master I =• • , , 'M -••-
• Plan (TSMP). ;' i v 1 '
centerlines. ( ) •;,', :, _ 9
Maintain street trees Install yellow high
sn to ensure signage
w visibility. visibility crosswalks
at all crossings
�_! ....tmAkItt Im lement trafficwithin a school zone p ��- distance(600 ft.).
calming measures
y - approaching N 6th ve
• ., schools,such as Implement traffic �� speed cushions, calming measures
speed feedback
y signs,and curb Upgrade existing approaching extensions. signalized intersection schools,such as f ' ` speed cushions,
-4
tistik
with high visibility speed feedback
, k• '' crosswalks,'Left a g signs,and curb Turn Yield on
Green'signage and extensions.

Upgrade existing hardened centerlines.
signalized intersection Realign curb ramps •t7 with'Left Turn Yield on with crosswalks. Campus Ave Green'signage and
hardened centerlines. 1F o
Realign curb ramps 0
with crosswalks. Replace(3)non ADA - ,i
e -0
- -•• PPBs per TSMP. •- . J+E_,— - - _ c a)
Upland Junior 00 E
High School E
0 School Existing Bicycle Facilities Proposed Bicycle Facilities N Park Class I Multi-Use Path - - Class I Multi-Use Path Lb Q Transit stop r................ Class II Bicycle Lane - - Class II Bicycle Lane N Class III Bicycle Route - - Class III Bicycle Route Q Signalized Intersection Class IV Separated Bikeway - - Class IV Separated Bikeway U
Note: Conceptual design segments demonstrate only a portion of the entire project length.

11th Street Project Length

3.58 miles
OEntire Project: Monte Vista Avenue to Hospital Parkway Conceptual Design Segment: Mountain Avenue to Euclid Avenue

EXISTING CONDITIONS
llth Street is a 2-lane collector street that , r J'L — I -\ runs east to west with a posted speed limit I 1 --- L�E�FIIf�1r� ‘
of 35 mph. llth Street connects to major ' "�Zlkra'11Prll corridors that run north to south such as / 2,"0• + � _ Mountain Avenue, San Antonio Avenue, / 'r•arg111iir uii�iii� .,,� ��' rraf'rmLIr1 11����i11111WL __ . t
and Euclid Avenue. It contains a variety of ' . �F.�iL4111C 1E�--RJ111 i71r► residential, retail, restaurant, office, service, flMKTRIFifillfll ",i� I " ' ' ��ti
industrial, park, school, and entertainment S11EN110'11111112 11 uses. The corridor has no bus stops and is / 6 r'` I� uww +=,limp t controlled by seven signalized intersections. i `.. C� mom , { On-street parallel parking is permitted / ��lit:el s sure '_.1 r.w mf .1.. it s
intermittently throughout the corridor with t ~ — 1 - -, - 1�I�!�i; R.7 III—I itet�IE1 L 1 1ir ~
parking prohibited in many areas. No bicycle i _. facilities exist along the entire corridor.

Entire Project
RECOMMENDATIONS I • •I Conceptual Design Segment
Recommendations are visualized in the
Conceptual Design Segment and can be
applied throughout the corridor as appro-
priate. AT A GLANCE
► New bicycle facilities and enhancements ;Ol1 -� (i.e., Class III bicycle route, speed limit , ,,_,,,. reduction, pavement markings, signage, w ` 3 and traffic calming)
► Traffic calming measures (i.e., speed Schools Parks cushions, raised crosswalks, speed
feedback signs, and curb extensions) '''
► Intersection improvements (i.e., hardened 61147 "i .2 `M�r
centerlines, signage, and high-visibility
g y Pedestrian Bicycle
Q crosswalk markings)
ce
o ► ADA improvements (i.e., ADA-compliant Collisions Collisions a curb ramps, Pedestrian Push Buttons
Z (PPBs), and bus stops)
► i e., shelters and trash PROPOSED CONDITIONS
o Bus stop amenities (.

EL receptacles)
s
°' ► Crossing enhancements (i.e., RRFBs and
a high-visibility crosswalk markings)
o , NI ■■ .

O _
se,
v ■
180 Page 525 of 707

9 Conceptual Design Segment:llth Street from Mountain Avenue to Euclid Avenue I
*_�� 'k+ } Upgrade all standard
Mountain Ave
crosswalks to
P yellow high-visibilityI
1 Upgrade existing I• crosswalks when within I ..ruce Ave - signalized intersection school zone distance I — -- •- fi T.

Install green with high-visibility t, (600 ft.). transition striping vi crosswalks,'Left Turn Yield I Upland High at intersections for on Green'signage and 1 School Class II hardened centerlines. Add truncated domes proposed r to existing curb ramps
Bicycle Lanes. Realign curb ramps with where absent. crosswalks. 1
Add a high-visibility N Ukiah Way I
crosswalk. Replace(5)non-ADA - . _ I
I PPBs per TSMP. ' •
{�q�
Birch Ave 1 41 I
. la
K;: I.s I,
Upgrade east-west I - Y
standard crosswalks N Tulare►Nay I
I
________________________
to yellow high- 1 Baldy 1' Consider installing visibility crosswalks. I View Park an RRFB and raised I _.•••-.�•...• 1 crosswalk for existing I Consider installing north-south crosswalk.
an RRFB for existing Conduct a traffic
north-south I study to determine if 1 crosswalk.Conduct I Install Class III bicycle warranted. I a traffic study I route.Reduce speed
to determine if limit to 30 mph or lower
warranted. (per SB 1216)and install 1 N Redding Way • I • sharrow pavement Install Class III bicycle
I
markings and'Share the route.Reduce speed
Install'School Bus I Road'signage. limit to 30 mph or r Stop Ahead'signs. lower(per SB 1216) 1
and install sharrow
Explore options to Balmy View pavement markings ;Ln prevent flooding Elementary and'Share the Road' I d during rain events. I School signage. I Implement traffic N Quince Ave
Upgrade existing p Implement traffic
calming
crosswalks to high- I measures Upgrade existing I calming measures approaching schools, approaching schools,
visibility crosswalks. signalized intersection 1 such as speed cushions, such as speed speed feedback signs, with high visibility I cushions,speed Consider installing and curb extensions. crosswalks,'Keep I feedback signs,and an RRFB for north- I Mac Clear'pavement Ave g south crosswalk. marking,and curb extensions.

Conduct a traffic I Upgrade existing hardened centerlines. study to determine 1 signalized intersection Realign curb ramps if warranted. I with'Left Turn Yield on with crosswalks.

Green'signage and
Camphor I hardened centerlines. ,;,:

Realign curb ramps with o•
Add a yellow high crosswalks. Laur,•I Ave
visibility crosswalks. I Install bus shelter and 1 Consider east to west trash receptacles
1 dedicated left turn. at bus stop and
I Conduct a traffic study to determine if warranted. i p bring stop into Bring bus stop into ADA compliance. ADA compliance.t OmniTrans OmniTrans c 1 • { coordination needed. O
Replace(2)non-ADA _. coordination needed. •,7 I PPBs per TSMP. .:
0 } Euclid Ave
San Antonio Ave ' N
11 I Q 0 E
School Existing Bicycle Facilities Proposed Bicycle Facilities 0 a
Park Class I Multi-Use Path - - Class I Multi-Use Path CrS Q Transit stop • Class II Bicycle Lane - - Class II Bicycle Lane 6 Class III Bicycle Route - - Class III Bicycle Route a Signalized Intersection Class IV Separated Bikeway - - Class IV Separated Bikeway U
Note: Conceptual design segments demonstrate only a portion of the entire project length.

Foothill Boulevard Project Length

4.08 miles
OEntire Project: Western City limit to Grove Avenue
Conceptual Design Segment: Campus Avenue to Memorial Park

EXISTING CONDITIONS
Foothill Boulevard is a 4-lane major arterial , .,.•L — I that runs east to west with a posted speed / 1 LOEa�Flif��� ‘
limit of 45 mph, except near Upland High ' "�Zl "1E School. Foothill Boulevard contains a variety z,"6 in of retail, restaurant, office, service, industrial, I. �r•�rgIIILrmr�r>•ii�� .� „ rrWriMih IIiii�HIIIIL __ -. t
park, school, and entertainment uses. The I ��MINI 11C 1�•--:1111 �71r► corridor has 20 bus stops, a center turn / lirMIP'RlMTUI "-'l lane or medians, frontage roads, and is Iv g I 'I" " 'ig€IiF..lrailllimPta 11
controlled by 15 signalized intersections. On- / ur.wea"WWI 6w_ w. 1 street parking is not permitted and Class II / �lIME■ -EMMI ll`MEME 1l1il1Iisimiii�1 ' I
bicycle lanes exist along the entire corridor. ? IIRE III—I
--
OrillFirRECOMMENDATIONS - "Ir•�' Ri•7 PE=,1� 1— Recommendations are visualized in the —
Conceptual Design Segment and can be Entire Project applied throughout the corridor as appro- I • •I Conceptual Design Segment priate.
► Bicycle facility upgrade (i.e., Class IV
separated bikeways and green transition
striping) AT A GLANCE
► Intersection improvements (i.e., hardened
centerlines, signage, pedestrian safety *11
II=1
islands, and high-visibility crosswalk Inrklig . markings) •
► ADA improvements (i.e., ADA-compliant
Schools Parks
curb ramps, bus stops, and Pedestrian
Push Buttons)
sattra itiat,-
► Bus stop amenities (i.e., shelters and trash
)
rece tacles 5 6
t Pedestrian Bicycle
a ► Roadway modifications (i.e., lane
ce
o narrowing and raised center median) Collisions Collisions z ► Placemaking opportunities (i.e., street
L furnishing and public art) PROPOSED CONDITIONS c
0 E
aJ
f
o \ ',
r W I 1
iii
:.
,....

O _
182 Page 527 of 707

9 Conceptual Design Segment: Foothill Boulevard from Campus Avenue to Memorial Park I s ir[, ii._: .r
Install bus shelters at .' r.*..
, : : I
bus stop.OmniTrans o' �'— ...
coordination itt. [ _needed.
it'
►' Campus Ave 1
Install green
I= P transition striping at
intersections and
Iill! h driveways.

Upgrade existing 1 Opportunity to install I signalized I street furnishing or I: Consider reducing intersection with
high-visibility -nI public art. I. number of driveways g y ❑ 3 alongFoothill
crosswalks and ❑ '" I i°
�1 I -__ - ? w Boulevard to limit pedestrian safety 27I � . r_ 1 a
islands.Realign opportunities for
v� I ,- conflicts between
curb ramps with ¢I '' ' • , Upgrade striped d crosswalks or add n center turn lane I ,� road users. truncated domes to a raised center I
0 to existing curbs. - , .1 median• • median with I E planting. Memorial I a) o.

Install green L 2
transition striping I Park I n w xi
at intersection I R
tip=
i IIINVII.. .
and driveways. r
I y Upgrade existing Upgrade existing
n Class II Bicycle signalized f
I Lane to a Class IV Turn Yield on Green'intersection with'Left 1N 13th Ave ■ a
I o Separated Bikeway. I.
c signage.Realign • Upgrade existing I -n curb ramps with Class II Bicycle a Install green crosswalks or add
g transition striping at truncated domes to Lane to a Class IV Separated Bikeway.

I S • intersections and existing curbs.

X a driveways.

I Replace(3)non-ADA Install bus shelters
I Consider reducing PPBs per TSMP. and trash receptacles • �j • number of driveways at bus stops and �. 3 1 _AI along Foothill bring stops into ADA r
��I, - Boulevard to limit compliance.OmniTrans ti opportunities for I coordination needed.
,._
. ; conflicts between
Upgrade striped N Alta ve
`�_ I road users. center turn lanes
'��ss�4 to raised center
•
1 ` - I Upgrade existing medians with
signalized planting. ,�1 Q
. �`' • I A intersection with I f►1 ti high visibility I �J
:i
` I i, crosswalks
R" — +' li _ I and hardened
rr I centerlines.Realign
1 Etiii I curb ramps with 01 Ii* ' . 1 crosswalks or add A• �z • . truncated domes to
I existin• g curbs.

HosP��al ON" 01 0
1,7
0 I -O
C
memorial0 a)Park P E
I
E
School Existing Bicycle Facilities Proposed Bicycle Facilities 0 r
Park Class I Multi-Use Path - - Class I Multi-Use Path ici Q Transit stop Class II Bicycle Lane - - Class II Bicycle Lane 6 Class III Bicycle Route - - Class III Bicycle Route Q Signalized Intersection Class IV Separated Bikeway - - Class IV Separated Bikeway U
Note: Conceptual design segments demonstrate only a portion of the entire project length.

8th Street Project Length

2.32 miles
OEntire Project: Benson Avenue to Eastern City limit
Conceptual Design Segment: Euclid Avenue to 8th Street Reservoir Park

EXISTING CONDITIONS
8th Street is a 2-lane to 4-lane secondary _j51 —__
arterial that runs east to west with a posted I i • L ma speed limit of 35 to 40 mph. It contains a ' ', _ '�'� -, variety of residential, retail, restaurant, park, 2," �, diiipwioi school,and religious uses.The corridor has a �- r�A LER-m■ center turn lane on most of the corridor and / "JF.ilL .J■PJii is controlled by five signalized intersections. / I " w i a, tI� ,V On-street parking is permitted intermittently �• 66f ` throughout the residential and recreational /' Li aka l -� og�'- - 1 g se
segments of the corridor, with parking / 11�1�!■, �iiir. Y { / IIIIL._I�l""�II�..._� . �I
prohibited in all other areas. A Class III _ bicycle route exists from Euclid Avenue to Y ' - �► f n�� ���+� 11 ' rl. IL w -r
Campus Avenue. 1 - _� I
RECOMMENDATIONS Entire Project
Recommendations are visualized in the I • •I Conceptual Design Segment Conceptual Design Segment and can be
applied throughout the corridor as appro-
priate.
► New bicycle facilities and enhancements AT A GLANCE (i.e., Class II bicycle lanes, Class III bicycle
lift°
route, speed limit reduction, pavement , 'r, ...I::111 4 r 0.�,:'
markings, signage, and traffic calming) �,. . ► Traffic calming measures (i.e., speed
cushions,raised crosswalks,neighborhood Schools Parks traffic circles, and curb extensions)
► Intersection improvements (i.e., hardened ' '' centerlines, signage, LED stop si ns, and 6E148
I �""r''''high-visibility crosswalk markings O a ► Crossing enhancements (i.e., RRFBs and Pedestrian Bicycle cg
o high-visibility crosswalk markings) Collisions Collisions a ► ADA improvements (i.e., ADA-compliant
a curb ramps and bus stops)

PROPOSED CONDITIONS
a
EL
Note: This priority project is adjacent to
a a project in progress on the following k' ". _ - streets:
—` 1-,Ap -
01st Avenue and 2nd Avenue (from ) AIM
o Stowell St. to 7th St.)
a
Q
184 Page 529 of 707

9 Conceptual Design Segment: 8th Street from Euclid Avenue to 8th Street Reservoir Park r-
Upgrade existing Bring bus stops into Enhance existing •-1l •IP r l- Upgrade to LED stop signalized ADA compliance. Class III bicycle signs,high-visibility intersection with l OmniTrans route by reducing crosswalks,and high-visibility coordination speed limit to 30 realign curb ramps crosswalks,'Keep required. mph or lower(per SB 5Sul_ . _ _ with crosswalks Clear'pavement Q 1216)and installing or add truncated marking,hardened • Euclid Ave sharrow pavement domes to existing centerlines.Realign markings and'Share curbs. curb ramps with — ii�- the Road'signage.
crosswalks. 1( Alternatively,
1 (4 consider
neighborhood traffic I
Upgrade to LED stop circles as traffic
calming and for a
signs,high-visibility
Install Class II bicycle I crosswalks,and continuous traffic lanes from Euclid I realign curb ramps flow.

Avenue to 2nd I with crosswalksI
--
Avenue. I or add truncated
domes to existing
l curbs. Olivedale •
r-
5 IA Consider installing Park
1 _'T-• RRFBS at existing Consider installing a ).4.- `zK t uncontrolled north- mid-block crossing _. •-tr4 a 'I - south crosswalks with advanced •

1. 1- 1 +' or converting to warning signs,a all-way stops or raised and high-
] rt neighborhood traffic visibility crosswalk, ci
1' j I a rcles.
traf Conductficstudy and an RRFB.

It
Conduct a traffic
1 to determine if study to determine if l warranted. Implement warranted.
5 2nd Ave traffic calming
' measures,such
- as neighborhood
Enhance existing traffic circles,speed Upgrade to LED stop d speed Class III bicycle cushions, signs,high-visibility Upgrade to LED stop feedback signs,and
route by reducing g crosswalks,and
signs,high-visibility curb extensions. co
speed limit to 30 a realign curb ramps
crosswalks,and
mph or lower(per SB (n with crosswalks 1216)and installing realign curb ramps "" or add truncated sharrow pavement with crosswalks • domes to existing markings and'Share or add truncated curbs. the Road'signage. domes to existing N
S 3rd Ave curbs. .T,
_ -... .

Alternatively, ; • -.� -q`}- T
Implement consider ;
traffic calming neighborhood traffic , measures,such circles as traffic n Is
as neighborhood calming and for a
traffic circles,speed continuous traffic Campus Ave - cushions,speed flow.
feedback signs,and
curb extensions. • co
I C
0 S Sultana Ave l 8th Street ,7
• ' •c:c, I Reservoir - ,'; :§¢a• :. JP I Park a
� It ..b: 0 E
0 School Existing Bicycle Facilities Proposed Bicycle Facilities 0 r
Park Class I Multi-Use Path - - Class I Multi-Use Path C.ci Q Transit stop Class II Bicycle Lane - - Class II Bicycle Lane 6 Class III Bicycle Route - - Class III Bicycle Route Q Signalized Intersection Class IV Separated Bikeway - - Class IV Separated Bikeway U
Note: Conceptual design segments demonstrate only a portion of the entire project length.

Mountain Avenue AOProject Length

4.08 miles
OEntire Project: Mountain Lane to 7th Street
Conceptual Design Segment: Foothill Boulevard to 9th Street

EXISTING CONDITIONS
Mountain Avenue is a 4-lane to 6-lane major / *e - I -\ arterial that runs north to south with a posted I 1� �-- ti r�Flft =iM �
speed limit of 45 mph. Mountain Avenue . ',s ..r. � contains a variety of residential, retail, 2,"� _ , 214AII Ln rmi-- Iin
restaurant, office, service, entertainment, AMMA�N' lifll'llll�I� Illit " , park, school, and religious uses. The corridor ' Er-V aalli 1��--RJIIILEVI r► has a center turn lane or median, a railroad / 11,Ea RWinfll �'�,I1- crossing, and is controlled by18 signalized / ILWIIIIJ II1■.,€.!!1I 1 v g �r�_ .zlfr.11La�7IIIIII��a�IEli I
intersections. On-street parking is not 6T'F- 3WWYMUM' permitted and Class II bicycle lanes exist for / Midi INI■!IlllfllHUi�iir. Yli I
a short stretch north and south of Interstate / ?-� ::-IMIEWINE■ i 1 1 210. � _ — i _ IIF��i. ..::iT a Ri17 "-1
nE_==I
RECOMMENDATIONS —
Recommendations are visualized in the Entire Project Conceptual Design Segment and can be I • •I Conceptual Design Segment applied throughout the corridor as appro-
priate.
► New bicycle facilities (i.e., Class II bicycle AT A GLANCE lanes and green transition striping)
► Intersection improvements (i.e., hardened
centerlines, signage, and pedestrian lift° 'I safety islands) w A 111, ,;1
g
► ADA improvements (i.e., ADA-compliant Schools Parks curb ramps, bus stops, and pedestrian
push buttons)
► Bus stop amenities (i.e., shelters and trash # AO , receptacles) 811669► Crossing Enhancements (i.e., signage) u. Pedestrian Bicycle
4 Collisions Collisions
0 a
z
L PROPOSED CONDITIONS
0 L
aJ
0 2
•
_ -
,_,�
0 , i i
. .
_.

AI N.

Q
1 1
186 Page 531 of 707

9 Conceptual Design Segment: Mountain Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to 9th Street ! I Foot ill Blvd ,1 l� I Realign curb ramps --- II1,, — • [ with crosswalks or add` truncated domes to
Upgrade existing I Upgrade existing Install Class II Bicycle Lane. [ existing curbs. signalized intersection 1 striped center turn
with Leadin9 Pedestrian I lanes to a raised I Install green transition Intervals(LPIs),and center median. 1 striping at intersection a pedestrian safety I 1
and driveways for
island for east-west I Install Class II I proposed Class II raised center medians. Bicycle Lane. I Bicycle Lane.

Realign curb ramps 1
with crosswalks or add I Replace(5) non-ADA truncated domes to 1 I PPBs per TSMP.
existing curbs. I Add'Left Turn Yield on
Green'signage and
Install green transition I hardened centerlines for striping at intersection Arrow Hwy.
and driveways for
proposed Class II
Bicycle Lane. 1 W Arrow Hwy
Replace(1)non-ADA 1
PPBs per TSMP. I re 1
1 ! I
1 - ,- I • - Install bus shelter and
.:-' I t I trash receptacle at bus
I stop and bring into ADA
I f m I compliance.OmniTrans
Upgrade striped center I Q 1 coordination needed. turn lane approaching I E
intersection to raised L ra I
center median with I = + _ ' =
' —
planting. 1 #'117 A „�t y
1 I
�. `alp • I Replace non-ADA PPB.
11th St :► I
— — 11 I •acific Electric Trail
Upgrade existing 1 ; Add advanced
signalized intersection I warning signage for with hardened [ « I existing trail crossing. centerlines for 11th Street 1 - 17,E Realign curb ramps striping.Realign curb I r. with crosswalks or add 1 ramps with crosswalks _ >:: ` truncated domes to or add truncated I ¢. existing curbs.
domes to existing curbs. 1 .1.°u
D -1 r-Y-
- 1 a
Replace(5)non-ADA `^'•_
PPBs per TSMP. I Ajt,-,L�`- ",-"
Add'Left Turn Yield on
Green'signage and
x_ 1 hardened centerlines
_ I for 9th St. coc
k 1
it„..., „ I
9th St
0 Oil E
_ i I , E
�
0 School Existing Bicycle Facilities Proposed Bicycle Facilities 0 r
Park Class I Multi-Use Path - - Class I Multi-Use Path C.ci RI Transit stop Class II Bicycle Lane - - Class II Bicycle Lane 6 Class III Bicycle Route - - Class III Bicycle Route Q Signalized Intersection Class IV Separated Bikeway - - Class IV Separated Bikeway U
Note: Conceptual design segments demonstrate only a portion of the entire project length.

9th Street Project Length

3.50 miles
OEntire Project: Central Avenue to Grove Avenue
Conceptual Design Segment: Euclid Avenue to Campus Avenue

EXISTING CONDITIONS
9th Street is a 2-lane collector street that runs I -', L — l -\ east to west with a posted speed limit of 35 1 1 W'- mph,with a lower speed limit of 15 mph though i ti E iiikm "v_ ‘ Downtown Upland. 9th Street connects to �Zla'i�_p 1 0.rmuumIIUII11[MS Upland's Historic Downtown and it contains a / y'raa�?Ilkahlirmilln variety of residential, retail, restaurant, office, FRAM nil "'� ' , LAIN llilC lESIIlII_Vill•
service, and entertainment uses. The corridor / & AWRII rigiME -,I� has a center turn lane or median on some / I " ' ' ' wsegments and is controlled by eight signalized SEI�.1IL��7IIIIIIE�al li intersections. On-street parking is permitted /_ 6r' 1�3YIIIWi�+= i intermittentlythroughout the residential 1 IrI ndnIME !lir 1 portions of the corridor but prohibited in most 1 LIE I 4111.
other areas. No bicycle facilities exist along the Y ' — , -- INFIRE 1 entire corridor. 1 _ _ ,_ —
RECOMMENDATIONS Entire Project
Recommendations are visualized in the Con- I • •I Conceptual Design Segment ceptual Design Segment and can be applied
throughout the corridor as appropriate.
► New bicycle facilities (i.e., Class II bicycle
lanes, Class III bicycle route, signage, and AT A GLANCE green transition striping)
► Install Class III bicycle route (from Central *11 ‘ iit 1 1v
Avenue to 2nd Avenue) w4_ 0► Install Class II bicycle lanes (from 2nd Avenue to Grove Avenue) Schools Parks
► Intersection improvements (i.e., hardened
centerlines, signage, LED stop signs, and - high-visibility crosswalk markings) r.-.
► Traffic calming measures (i.e., speed
u. cushions, neighborhood traffic circles, and Pedestrian Bicycle 4 curb extensions) Collisions Collisions a ► ADA improvements (i.e., ADA-compliant
z curb ramps and bus stops)
T. ► Bus stop amenities (i.e., shelters) PROPOSED CONDITIONS a
► Crossing Enhancements(i.e.,RRFBs,signage,
a) and high-visibility crosswalk markings)
1,.'.
o k,
Note: This priority project is adjacent to two
projects in progress on the following streets: ` ' -x, �� © 2nd Avenue (from Stowell St. to A St.), A - _ _ Street (from 2nd Ave. to 1st Ave.), and 1st ! D Avenue (between A St. and D St.)
c t
A Street (from 2nd Ave. to Campus Ave.), - - coo -e Q Campus Avenue (from A St. to Arrow
Hwy.),and Arrow Highway (from Campus
188 Ave.to 9th Ave.) Page 533 of 707

9 Conceptual Design Segment: 9th Street from Euclid Avenue to Campus Avenue J� i -••I • I.-; • .

Install bus shelters at I' -:'. r
unshaded bus stop Install Class II Bicycle Lanes.
1 and bringboth stops 1 -
p I � r �:;�
EU'l into ADA compliance.

OmniTrans I
I coordination needed. I
Upgrade existing I Install Class III bicycle I -;_= • • r= = signalized intersection I I -
with high visibility route.Reduce speed N 4th Ave "� A'4• , crosswalks,'Keep I limit to 30 mph or I lower(per SB 1216) I T - '
•
Clear'pavement -6-:' 11
marking,and 1 ' and install sharrow I k '. •
hardened centerlines. pavement markings . _' Realign curb ramps 1 and'Share the Road' 1 i -_ -,. with crosswalks. I signage I' 'r
I Install pedestrian Upgrade existing I :- 'I I crossing signs where '
utility pole obstructs standard crosswalk with x,• . % _, N I t Ave• high-visibility crosswalks. li 1 - view of pedestrians I !L =
•
I in the pedestrian — ,....r.._- 1 1,Upgrade to LED safety island. N 5.th.Aue stop signs. 1 `{ 1 tr
,; IMMO
Add truncated I 1 1
,
domes to existing Consider pedestrian I '.• ' .� Tim curb ramps, I crossing signs for e I : •.• ,d • y including curb existing midblock• _ F F. b ramps on central crossing. 1 .:11island of gazebo I • r i'-� roundabout. I `^
, '-e'vg„ _ _ _ _ _ _ I _ •r III { Implement traffic 1 _ F - .cA ,•' calming measures ! I . - ._ `'.
approaching,such as Upgrade existing
speed cushions,and I standard crosswalk with curb extensions. I L... high visibility crosswalks. 1•.K 1
T. r j
, I N 6th Ave
Upgrade existing 1., ' - Consider installing striping with hardened t .I , RRFBs at existing •centerlines. I uncon• trolled north-
! r 17 AIP south crosswalk.
i • 1 Conduct a traffic I .k .• - •:J[ 3r Ave study to determine if N ` s
Upgrade existing warranted. I I '6g°.-- . ' striping with I -a - ,
I hardened I p'" ..

Upgrade existing I centerlines. Upgrade standard I .: 3'g' •:' 'I c standard crosswalks crosswalks with high- .' lE I. • to high-visibility I visibility crosswalks and I-.: +.' ' .r r crosswalks and realign I realign curb ramps I Campus Ave east curb ramps with I with crosswalks.
crosswalks. - co
Consider converting I o'N C
I Install Class II Bicycle all-way stop to a 1 .1 'r 6 0 Lanes. neighborhood traffic I • 0
I circle.Conduct a traffic I �
N 4th Avc study to determine if
0 warranted. i 0 o
o
School Existing Bicycle Facilities Proposed Bicycle Facilities 0 a
Park Class I Multi-Use Path - - Class I Multi-Use Path ici Q Transit stop Class II Bicycle Lane - - Class II Bicycle Lane 6 Class III Bicycle Route - - Class III Bicycle Route Q Signalized Intersection Class IV Separated Bikeway - - Class IV Separated Bikeway U
Note: Conceptual design segments demonstrate only a portion of the entire project length.

San Antonio Avenue Project Length

4.01 miles
OEntire Project: 23rd Street to 7th Street
Conceptual Design Segment: 13th Street to Pacific Electric Trail

EXISTING CONDITIONS
San Antonio Avenue is a 2-lane to 4-lane *.i. - , secondary arterial that runs north to south l 1" — nil � ti� �Fiis�"i� ‘
with a posted speed limit of 35 mph. San .- I r i r i i Antonio Avenue contains a variety of ' �� �� residential, retail, restaurant, park, school, rr�I' illOaiiil. _"-'� =.. I religious, and entertainment uses. The . "ASIP �-:1■I � corridor has a center turn lane on a southern gri I�V portion of the corridor, a railroad crossing, / L — -
and it is controlled by seven signalized _I 4 6e.._,k ; {I intersections. On-street parking is permitted / 'MIMI `I.

I110. 21 ���1EININC ICY:1
intermittently throughout the residential ��� Y i =ram 'IEEU �� a portions of the corridor and prohibited in all 4 ��—I other areas, except for a passenger loading i - • , liim�mil I zone adjacent to Upland High School. No
bicycle facilities exist along the corridor. Entire Project I • •1 Conceptual Design Segment

RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommendations are visualized in the Con-
ceptual Design Segment and can be applied
throughout the corridor as appropriate. AT A GLANCE ► New bicycle facilities (i.e.,Class I multi-use
iiial •
path, Class IV separated bikeways, Class ii=1- III bicycle route, signage, and green tran- w4
sition striping)
► Install a Class I multi-use path (from 23rd Schools Parks Street to llth Street)
► Install Class IV separated bikeways (fromiiiti4,,,
llth Street to 8th Street) g
„
► Install Class III bicycle route (from 8th 811g40 � y t Pedestrian Bicycle
Q Street to 7th Street)
cg Collisions Collisions
o ► Intersection improvements (i.e., hardened
zcenterlines, signage, stop sign replace-
ment, and high-visibility crosswalk mark-
ings) PROPOSED CONDITIONS
c0
cT_ ► Traffic calming measures (i.e., speed
s6 feedback signs and roundabouts)
► ADA improvements (i.e., ADA-compliant
curb ramps, bus stops, and pedestrian '.
push buttons)
4'
O ► Bus stop amenities (i.e., shelters, trash I re 47 -
p ceptacles, and expanded seating)
O ► Roadway modifications (i.e., road diet, ; / ' ,,'r D lane narrowing, parking removal, and
raised center median)
190 Page 535 of 707

9 Conceptual Design Segment: San Antonio Avenue from 13th Street to Pacific Electric Trail Install Class I Multi- I Upgrade existing Upgrade existing I i Use Path along east I standard crosswalks signalized intersection I. side of San Antonio I with high-visibility i with'Left Turn Yield on I Avenue.Combination crosswalks,realign curb Green'signage and of lane narrowing, 1 ramps with crosswalks hardened centerlines. Upland High parking removal,and/ or add truncated Realign curb ramps School j or sidewalk expansion 1 -- domes to existing with crosswalks or add needed. I curbs,and hardened truncated domes to • } . I centerlines. existing curbs.

Replace(2)non-ADA
I. I Install green transition
I striping at intersections PPBs per TSMP. .T _ Add truncated I for proposed Class II 1 Install Class IV I Bicycle Lane. Alternatively,consider Separated Bikeway. domes and high- upgrading signalized I Road diet and lane visibility crosswalks. I Replace existing stop intersection to a I narrowing needed.

L. I sings with larger protected left turn 1 Upgrade existing 1 stop signs per Local signalized intersection. o Install green transition signalized i Roadway Safety Plan Traffic Study Required. 1 striping at intersections intersection with 1 (LRSP). a and driveways. yellow high visibility ? I c I Install speed feedback crosswalks and . 1 co I signs approaching hardened centerlines ❑ school.
for San Antonio Ave o I Install bus shelters at Upgrade existing I striping.Realign c 1 . both bus stops.Expand signalized intersection curb ramps with < seatingand add trash g I Add truncated domes to p 1 with high-visibility
crosswalks or add F receptacle I existing curb ramps and m p adjacentcrosswalks,'Left
truncated domes to I I to Upland High School. high-visibility crosswalks p g t Turn Yield on Green' where absent. existing curbs. I OmniTrans coordination ! signage,and hardened I needed. L centerlines.Realign curb
Replace(2)non-ADA 1 ramps with crosswalks Part of the Arrow Hwy PPBs per TSMP. or add truncated Rehabilitation CIP which includes curb,
P domes to existing curbs.
• Part of the Foothill Foothill Blvd- ,„ gutter,sidewalks,curb Blvd Rehabilitation F� ' •
Replace(2)non ADA ramps pavement
Capital Improvement 1 41 PPBs per TSMP. markings,and other Project(CIP)which - _ r improvements.
includes curb,gutter, I
sidewalks,curb 1 Arrow Hwy
ramps pavement I Install green transition Q •
markings,and other striping at intersection _
I and driveways for 1 a. :..�., �. improvements. ..., ",�,. ....:-„.
1 proposed Class IV I
Separated Bikeway.
1 Orchid Ct
I ! I Explore opportunities to bring Consider installing Isidewalks near a roundabout at Alpine.st
entrance to U land I 1 driveways on west side p I - _ Upgrade existing of San Antonio from 11th High School parking signalized intersection I St to Vernon Dr into ADA lot.Conduct a traffic with high-visibility compliance. study to determine if I crosswalks,'Left - ' warranted.Road diet I Turn Yield on Green'
may be needed. I • signage,and hardened �'
ro centerlines for Vernon w
N I Upland Hilt. I P ific Electric Trail c ► :u•-r Ct I Schack.-
. Dr striping.Realign curb "-- O
ramps with crosswalks I Redirect the Pacific a Upgrade striped I , or add truncated I Electric Trail to guide - center turn lane to domes to existing curbs. 1 users to the intersection N raised center median. I I crossing. E I
i i w E
o
School Existing Bicycle Facilities Proposed Bicycle Facilities c r
Park Class I Multi-Use Path - - Class I Multi-Use Path ici Q Transit stop ,--' Class II Bicycle Lane - - Class II Bicycle Lane 6 Class III Bicycle Route - - Class III Bicycle Route a Signalized Intersection Class IV Separated Bikeway - - Class IV Separated Bikeway U
Note: Conceptual design segments demonstrate only a portion of the entire project length.

Euclid Avenue Project Length

4.26 miles
OEntire Project: 24th Street to 7th Street
Conceptual Design Segment: Foothill Boulevard to 9th Street

EXISTING CONDITIONS
Euclid Avenue is a 4-lane to 6-lane major 1 r••• w l _ 1 4R arterial that runs north to south with a posted / 1L ""f '.. FEtfis""i�
speed limit of 40 to 45 mph. Euclid Avenue ► Lr� _ ,.t-r ` contains residential, retail, restaurant, office, / - --- — ark, and religious uses. The southern half of I. ir°ar?iNL�.'"��rr>:t■ . t the corridor has bus stops, a median with a 1 I a ,� ,R MON w - natural surface trail and street trees,a railroad / r 'T _1 — >r 1
crossing, and is controlled by 13 signalized / ' III 61.n. = 1"
intersections. On-street parking is permitted / °,'da,-, C.liz e1
along the entire corridor, except where room / - 6e ,. - n ill: � 1 does not allow for it. Class II bicycle lanes / „ILM •• III �WA 1��'',1 and Class III bicycle routes vary throughout t _ _ 1 - m• ,t=1:`s segments of the corridor. — -1 -- - ' t ''�. ' L 1 RECOMMENDATIONS Entire Project
Recommendations are visualized in the Con- I • • Conceptual Design Segment ceptual Design Segment and can be applied
throughout the corridor as appropriate.
► Bicycle facility upgrades (i.e., Class I multi-
use path, Class IV separated bikeways, sig- AT A GLANCE nage, and green transition striping)
► Upgrade Class II bicycle lanes to Class IV Allt • i■_,- separated bikeways (from 24th Street to . ,. ; ;.

Foothill Boulevard) lift° In
► Install a Class I multi-use path in the cen- Schools Parks ter median (from Foothill Boulevard to 7th
Street) L
► Intersection improvements (i.e., hardened
+
centerlines, signa e, and high-visibility �■�'� ,ya crosswalk markings
4 ► Intersection removal (i.e., removing unnec- Pedestrian Bicycle oessary mid-block intersections that cut Collisions Collisions Zit through the center median, such as one or
z fewer per block)
T.
► ADA improvements (i.e., ADA-compliant PROPOSED CONDITIONS o curb ramps and bus stops)
E
a) ► Bus stop amenities (i.e., shelters and trash
receptacles) =
—
Note:This priority project is adjacent to two , . o projects in progress on the following streets: ' �. p Stowell Street (from Euclid Ave.to Sultana -.• - o. - o / ' , -
Ave.) ,
Ti 7th Street (from Euclid Ave.to 2nd Ave.) 1 192 Page 537 of 707

9 Conceptual Design Segment: Euclid Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to 9th Street 1 Upgrade existingl
_ � pg Install a Class I
Foothill Blvd I �;, '' ' signalized intersection I Multi-Use Path in the . _ _'"� r with high-visibility median.

Upgrade existing ! - crosswalks,'Keep I • - Clear'pavement ha - -
signalized intersection I marking,and
1 A with high-visibility I hardened centerlines. imi .�i. crosswalks and'Left I Install bus shelter at Realign curb ramps Turn Yield on Green' bus stop.OmniTrans with crosswalks. E F St Y signage.Realign curb 1 coordination needed.
ramps with crosswalks. I ' 4 44
Provide signage help ./ '^TP"_ Install bus shelter and ! bicyclists navigate the - trash receptacle at i Install bus shelter transition from Class IV I - '_ -•ff l . ; , bus stop and bring I and at bus separated bikeway to I L;. _
,, into ADA compliance. stop.OmniTrans
Class I multi-use path. I >^' r OmniTrans I coordination needed. 1 �L d. coordination needed.
1 r. �• k: ,� w I Arrow Hwy:Mil .

I 1 .1 a: i 4,;.:*,,
AP I Upgrade existing Install a Class I Multi- Use --
I signalized intersection Use Path in the median I _ with high visibility and add high visibility :� Imo_ . _A:.
crosswalks,'Keep Clear'
k .z.41 .: ..t 1 pavement marking, crosswalks and 1 , _ I pedestrian warning
and hardened signs where the path Upgrade existing I centerlines. I
Install trash crosses travel lanes.(in I standard crosswalk I addition to the existing to a high-visibility receptacle and 1 1• • , . Class II Bicycle Lanes). I crosswalk and seating at southern › i R -• - I realign curb ramps bus stop and bring <C 1 . ,� iel Consider reducing 1 with crosswalks. both stops into D.

I i .. number of stop-
ADA compliance. . .. . +; • I. E D St controlled intersections
OmniTrans • • in the median (e.g., i ^ �ti, ;, ° coordination h. <1 per every 1/4-mile
'� 4
needed. I ,s block). lig ;:'-.4.,� .

I
r! 9
} 11th St Pacific Electric Trail
i I
I Install a curb ramp at 1 Upgrade existing I the southwest corner of 1 signalized intersection Install a Class I the intersection;install 1 with high-visibility Multi-Use Path in •
A I up-to-date pedestrian 1 crosswalks,'Keep the median and 1 signage for each —t Clear'pavement • add high-visibility I approach along Euclid marking,and crosswalks and 1 Avenue;and install I hardened centerlines pedestrian warning Add truncated high-visibility crosswalks I for 9th St.Realign curb where thepath domes and high-
signswith lines and
yieldi ramps with crosswalks.
crosses travel lanes. I visibility crosswalks standardized signage .= . .

I at intersections. per SBCTA Points of . 1
Consider reducing I Pedestrian Interest Plan. ¢ I ..,-t'.... . ' number of G St v I •• -
-
sto controlled 1 " " -�, cn intersections in the I Install bus shelters at w I . b I "' " : .. c unshaded bus stop 1 L. 4: O
median (e.g.,<1 per 1 and bring both stops 9th St .a every 1/4-mile block). I into ADA compliance. - - 1 - -0 I OmniTrans N
Acoordination needed. .• 1 0:1 a)
O
School Existing Bicycle Facilities Proposed Bicycle Facilities 0 r
Park Class I Multi-Use Path - - Class I Multi-Use Path i:6 Q Transit stop Class II Bicycle Lane - - Class II Bicycle Lane Class III Bicycle Route - - Class III Bicycle Route Q Signalized Intersection Class IV Separated Bikeway - - Class IV Separated Bikeway U
Note: Conceptual design segments demonstrate only a portion of the entire project length.

Memorial Park/13th Avenue Project Length

0.72 miles
OEntire Project: Foothill Boulevard to Pacific Electric Trail Conceptual Design Segment: llth Street to Pacific Electric Trail

EXISTING CONDITIONS
Memorial Park/13th Avenue/Hospital Park- t L - I ` - -- way is not a designated road but an area I i�� mamma of City owned parcels adjacent to Memo- , L E Z�k'T7 rial Park and San Antonio Regional Hospital r. ,n � '�.r�nrm�nmmra
that intersects east to west roads such as /. '�e IltLnnrMalln .,,� " rr riliLIh IIiinilI1IKL __ - . t
Foothill Boulevard,11th Street, San Bernardino / F.�iNIE l-:RJw IIII i71r► Road, and Arrow Highway. The project area / lir91.�1=�L I 01 ",I i I " ' '
1v
contains residential, medical, and park uses, SEE,,11L�L-'1111111E III 1 including Memorial Park and San Antonio -' Tili�3IIoolawm Regional Hospital. A single signalized inter- / I IMEIMIlllflII 1. { H IL I:IL'"'�II���EWI➢:!FUNGI✓
section is located within this project area r MII-1E...�. as well as the Pacific Electric Trail and bus t - - ' - , -- WIS: anm ■i-1 '7
stops on San Bernardino Road. - r�'lll1:P==L1° 1' RECOMMENDATIONS Entire Project
Recommendations for the entire project I • •I Conceptual Design Segment are visualized in the Conceptual Design
Segment.
► New bicycle facilities (i.e., Class I multi- AT A GLANCE use path, Class IV separated bikeway,
and Class III bicycle route) •
► Intersection improvements (i.e., hardened l =_l centerlines, signage, and high-visibility lift° w � ...._.. crosswalk markings) . 2
► Traffic calming measures (i.e., speed Schools Parks cushions, speed feedback signs, and chi-
canes) Nall '.'!
► Crossing Enhancements (i.e., RRFBs and .,.
1- high-visibility crosswalk markings)
a
Pedestrian Bicycle
ix Collisions Collisions
0 a
z
L PROPOSED CONDITIONS
0 E
0 • . _�y !.

R \
R ',
Ti M
194 Page 539 of 707

9 Conceptual Design Segment: Memorial Park/13th Avenue from 11th Street to Pacific Electric Trail tiI+ Upgrade existing:z Z standard crosswalk '-i a I a to high-visibility
I' ■ o I crosswalks,realign
• z
1 curb ramps with
■ crosswalks or add
. truncated domes to
existing curbs,and
rFL. , restripe pavement
r__ 1 markings.
/Installa Class °' 1 Memorial Park
III Bicycle Route
through existing iiiiir
surface parking lot. I
I
1 /
I Install a Class I multi-
use path along San
N. Bernardino Road
I to connect to 13th
el i. Avenue.

San Bernardino Rd
Consider installing I
a high-visibility 1 • -
crosswalk with an 1
RRFB to facilitate 1 -
north-south f,
crossing.Conduct _ r
a traffic study 1
to determine if . w I .
warranted. 4_ 1 1''
- 7�J^.
• 1
Install Class III K ,. �� 1
Bicycle Route/Bike Y • _ • y � Boulevard.Reduce .r, _ - ry,
speed limit to 30 R z ;; •' / �
mph or lower(per ► '
SB 1216)and install . "` -
•
sharrow pavement 1 -.
markings and'Share 1 ',- Y -
the Road'signage. 1 r," 4 '•- Y
Implement traffic ► ■• . ' R_*, `'
calming measures, IL ( -
•
such as speed 1 '' `' •-
cushions and •` f 4 `
chicanes. � / -
ir
1 1.,,,,,, S6+r
Transition Bike ' '�
Boulevard to a Class • 41
I Multi-Use Path ■ ■ .b...1sr;
co
(or bike-friendly :ail ':
sidewalk)to direct ti . r -• 1 ' 'O users to the existing pacific bike crossing for the rectric ■ c Pacific Electric Trail. . a)
• 4) E
0 School Existing Bicycle Facilities Proposed Bicycle Facilities 0 r
Park Class I Multi-Use Path - - Class I Multi-Use Path ici Q Transit stop Class II Bicycle Lane - - Class II Bicycle Lane 6 Class III Bicycle Route - - Class III Bicycle Route a Signalized Intersection Class IV Separated Bikeway - - Class IV Separated Bikeway U
Note: This conceptual design segment demonstrates the entire project length.

16th Street/Baseline Road la
Project Length

3.97 miles
OEntire Project: City Limits to Tanglewood Avenue
Conceptual Design Segment: City Limits to Benson Avenue

EXISTING CONDITIONS
Baseline Road/16th Street is a 4-lane / ��I _ I secondary arterial with a posted speed limit I 1 = ' --- LWE�Flrtl��r� .
of 45 mph. Baseline Road connects directly ' " =Zlkra'1Pr11 to Interstate 210 and is near Cable Airport. It / ,"6O•f in rdiAiikLn irMall .,, )
contains residential, retail, restaurant, office, •Y,115Lirdil����iniliiL _"_% . , park, and entertainment uses. The corridor aiiiilram1"-==11111s:�7s has a center turn lane for the majority of the FINER!+�EirilllM —T"I I 'I" '. ' Iv
corridor, medians on the west end of the NEE,11L�L"']111IIII a� lif corridor, and is controlled by 11 signalized / saki.____ a��l:�i" t 66 intersections. On-street parking is not i iiiWidni ommilliillllli�iir.unionwiillisiire ,,1 permitted on the corridor. Class II bicycle r -� MIEMIIREE a lanes exist along most of the corridor, with a 1 - - 1 - , -- IRIE!Ei NEE III—I '7r'A'�iE t EEI I
gap between Kelly Avenue and 2nd Avenue i -.
designated as a Class III bicycle route.

Entire Project
RECOMMENDATIONS I • •I Conceptual Design Segment
Recommendations are visualized in the
Conceptual Design Segment and can be
applied throughout the corridor as appro-
priate. AT A GLANCE
► Bicycle facility upgrades (i.e.,Class IV sep-
lift° ; ......;.•
arated bikeways, Class II bicycle lanes, ii=l and green transition striping) w4 ,
► Upgrade Class II bicycle lanes to Class IV
separated bikeways (from the western Schools Parks city limit to Benson Avenue)
► Upgrade Class III bicycle route to Class IIgiatik '.'! bicycle lanes (from N. Kelly Avenue to N.
2nd Avenue)
t Pedestrian Bicycle
Q ► Intersection improvements (i.e., hardened
ce
o centerlines, signage, and high-visibility Collisions Collisions a crosswalk markings)
T ► ADA improvements (i.e., ADA-compliant
c curb ramps and Pedestrian Push Buttons) PROPOSED CONDITIONS E
s6
o Y
2 {1
o 1 , . .
11 , N
c / \ -
o
196 Page 541 of 707

9 Conceptual Design Segment: Baseline Road/16th Street from City Limits to Benson Avenue 11 I .+.. i =
Install green t�.
transition striping I Upgrade existing
- - for existing Class II I Class II Bicycle Bicycle Lane. 1 Lanes to Class IV
I Separated Bikeways.

II
Upgrade existing
1 signalized Install high-visibility I i I intersection with crosswalks at I T
I ar , high-visibility intersections. I crosswalks and
realign curb ramps Install green
I with crosswalks. transition striping ,� _ , -g I for existing Class I '
Upgrade existing I II Bicycle Lanes/ 1 . a; Class II Bicycle Proposed Class IV '
Separated Bikeways ; + •
Lanes to Class IV , I ` • .

Install high-visibilityat intersections.

Separated Bikeways. I µ_ • �. �..n� ,,
I crosswalks at ! , '
o,1u IRC
I intersections. I =41_' - `P- LT(
I I'll „ ' -
It, T I Install green I r• f �' lik r 1' st transition striping
• .+:
i�_ I in for existing Class I .1 •, - T k.,...,..,,, I I II Bicycle Lanes/ I �" • -iy ,•:+r i.. .11 ii I Proposed Class IV , ,e , I r ' -- '• Separated Bikeways • i

1.1.�*.�!'_ i 4 I at intersections. Install green -Il�;x a
I transition striping
` IN 1 for existing Class II
Central Ave Bicycle Lane,a high- II
4-1 visibility crosswalk, a
I and add truncated i ;' `I
I domes to existing '� .• �- ; :'
Upgrade existing , r
I signalized curbs. 1 , ,;
I I intersection with I .y '-:' . '• •
I high-visibility Upgrade existing I !��' •�' r
. , Sil
,� , crosswalks and signalized 1 " � • I .� I realign curb ramps intersection with I I +�. ' k „; ,� y with crosswalks.

I high-visibility I ig .f
crosswalks if __
I and hardened I •` ••Y =• R • '` . ;,s,.:. 1 centerlines.Realign 1 N San Gabriel Rd ; fr-• I curb ramps with 1
• -:K., ,. I crosswalks or add I � �- .,- ,�•- „' truncated domes to -
-_t- ..14:i
I existingcurbs. I R, Replace(5)non ADAk -. A. 1 PPBs per TSMP. o
I co
f to
_104 . { '
I 1
t I �' II13)
IT N o
o
� QE � ��
0 C i City Boundary Existing Bicycle Facilities Proposed Bicycle Facilities CD tY
School Class I Multi-Use Path - - Class I Multi-Use Path Park Class II Bicycle Lane - - Class II Bicycle Lane 6 I:4 Transit stop Class III Bicycle Route - - Class III Bicycle Route Q 0 Class IV Separated Bikeway - - Class IV Separated Bikeway _c Signalized Intersection U
Note: Conceptual design segments demonstrate only a portion of the entire project length. Page 542 of 707 197

5.7 PROGRAM

RECOMMENDATIONS
0 (Race r 'ire While infrastructure projects demonstrate the most tangible evidence of a walkable,
bikeable, and transit-friendly city, they are
brought to life by programs and events
�. '' � . _ • that encourage people to use them. The _ it .1:�ti t proposed infrastructure improvements r1, , . . outlined at the beginning of this chapter P PAit? - provide the foundation for a safe and '' '�'"" convenient active transportation and , - public transit system. However, the City can •% •.___ , ,. r , encourage proper and widespread use of ',� �4 ":4? ..4 these facilities by hosting engaging and lip '.) '%-t - educational programs, events, campaigns, .�'E and more.Pairing infrastructure projects with At.: - A encouragement and education programs can help generate community excitement
i j_ :
-' (.., and promote walking, bicycling, and taking - le gom/Ref...YEW, A public transit as attractive travel options. -�- The following programs are organized as a iiiit ' r =�05' • -4 menu of recommendations for the City to t f _ consider throughout the implementation of ` this Plan. The programmatic recommenda-
"A
tions are inspired by the original "Six E's" of
transportation planning developed by the
Safe Routes Partnership: Encouragement,
1 i I tri Education, Equity, Enforcement, Engineering, 9 g
'if-
�� and Evaluation.
it 10 ( IS rIr ii :,.. . , '.1. , - 5 it( ?,' . .7
Vit.
[L.
11 ~.*-'may. - . ..•.- . ' . ''..
illw

Encouragement Promote Walk and Bike to School Days Encouragement programs are designed to Partner with the Upland Unified School District make walking, bicycling, and taking public to promote a 'Walk to School Day' and a transit more fun and attractive. By actively 'Bike to School Day' that gives students and encouraging Uplanders to walk, ride a families the opportunity to socialize, start bicycle, and take public transit through fun the day off with exercise and enthusiasm, events and programs, the City can help build healthy habits, and form connections people cultivate different travel habits and with other members of the community. decrease motor vehicle usage over time. To
achieve this, the City can collaborate with Encourage Schools to Create a 'Bike local partners to organize activities and Bus'
events that promote active transportation Encourage local schools to create a 'Bike and public transit. Bus' to facilitate fun and safe bicycling to school. Bike buses are led by a "bus
rilr'4,4.„,.,,e''' ° ' driver"—an adult on a bike— who guides a f slowly moving group of bicyclists along a
l/ 1 • predefined route to school. Kids and their it 1011
i"" families can join the group as they ass by _ on their way to school.
it 1 - Continue to Host 5K Running/Walking
'.,.,, s .tea 1 .,
Events
" '� 1;', , Continue to host low-cost or free five- rs - - - ,, � ,i•, ��-,1
�`- _ _•.. . , kv , � ° kilometer running and walking events, ,, `� ' , . ,-' 1 such as the Lemon Zest 5K. These events ,� 1 , are an excellent wayto encourage people • �y-'= =t: of °; - - d.' i :-;; I to explore their city on foot. Post-race ____- --1 __ 14 .1 - refreshments and healthy snacks can be f - provided to participants.

Host Open Streets Events
Participate in National Bike Month Host an 'Open Streets' event by temporarily Participate in National Bike Month by closing a street to motor vehicles and hosting a community activity, such as a opening it for active transportation. Open Bike Breakfast, Bike to Work Day, Bike Fridays, Streets events, also known as Ciclovias, etc. During May, cities across the country allow for the reclamation of public space for organize events and campaigns to educate community gathering, play, and movement. people about bicycling and to encourage Open Streets events encourage physical them to ride bicycles to their destinations. activity, increase local business, and have a positive social impact on the community.

Host Guided Walks, Hikes,and Bike These events can include live music, public w Rides art installations, outdoor games, food ° Host guided walks, hikes, and bicycle rides vendors, exercise classes, bicycle repair to encourage trail, pedestrian, and bicycle stations, and more. E facility usage in a safe and welcoming Create a Public Map of Bicycle and E setting. Events can be promoted as tours to Multi-use Facilities&Trails 0 local destinations, such as parks, trailheads, ,2 historical buildings, public art, or Downtown Develop a public-facing map of bicycle crs Upland.Events can include helpful tips about and multi-use facilities and trails to .) road safety and trail use and can be geared help community members plan active a toward specific age groups (e.g., family- transportation routes throughout the city. v friendly, seniors, etc.) or skill levels.

Run Creative Campaigns and Education
Challenges Educational workshops and campaigns can Run interactive campaigns and challenges be impactful tools to empower Uplanders to encourage walking, bicycling, and public to feel safe, comfortable, and confident transit in Upland. walking, riding a bicycle, or taking public transit. These education campaigns can
Encourage Bike-friendly Businesses help teach motorists, pedestrians, and Encourage local businesses, such as coffee bicyclists how to share the road safely. shops, restaurants, stores, and hotels, to Educational programs can be incorporated become certified bike-friendly businesses into regularly scheduled programs, such through the League of American Bicyclists. as the City's Recreation and Community This can be a way to advertise bike Services programs, hosted as stand-alone infrastructure that supports and encourages events, or held as a multi-part series. The people to ride locally and support the local City is encouraged to partner with local economy. Bike-friendly elements include agencies and organizations on public but are not limited to bicycle parking or education programs. storage, bicycle maps or information, and
bicycle repair stations. Incentivizing local AV,�l • ` ,. - • businesses to provide discounts to patrons c, ",•,,,:.,FT_.e r4. di . ' ,_ ' who arrive at their business by walking or , L ;. a ' .• bicycling can also boost these modes. ` y ', to Eticuo ,
'4."11.." E . UPland ��
Collaborate with Omnitrans to - -_ .

Promote Public Transit 300 ty -: _410- Collaborate with Omnitrans to promote r
public transit ridership. Promotional r �' ,r + campaigns can include, but are not limited
,. - `
to a 'Free Ride Day' where everyone rides
I �.
free,free bus passes for youth and students,
and a promotional campaign to increase BIKE 4. 411 :4-' awareness of the OmniRide microtransit6RouTE
service. :,: . ,, A .

Coordinate with Omnitrans and
Metrolink to Improve First-Last Mile Promote Motorist-targeted Messaging Mobility Explore areas to install educational signage u. Coordinate with Omnitrans and Metrolink (temporary or permanent) to inform 4 to improve active transportation facilities motorists of pedestrian and bicycling in
along public transit routes to help address safety. Messaging should encourage drivers zRI
the first-last mile problem (i.e., the distance to be more alert and mindful when sharing L between a bus stop and the final destination) the road with bicyclists. For example, police o that often deters people from taking public departments often deploy trailer-based c transit. Examples of improvements include portable electronic sign platforms with installing safe and comfortable bicycle customizable messages to address areas a facilities connecting bus stops to common of speeding or DUls with specific messages, destinations and other improvements to that are then moved when other priority the built environment, such as landscaping, areas develop. Example messages are o pedestrian-scale lighting, shade trees, and Drive high, get a DUI" near dispensaries, or access to parks and recreation amenities. Lycra and speeding don't mix" on roads c Where feasible, improve bus stop conditions frequented by recreational bicyclists.

TD_Q such as adding bus shelters, lighting, and
seating (see Bus Stop Improvements section
earlier in this chapter).
200 Page 545 of 707

Launch a Bicycle and Pedestrian ride a bicycle, as well as how to navigate Safety Education Campaign the rules of the road. Workshops can be Conduct an ongoing pedestrian and geared toward youth and/or adults. These bicycle safety education campaign to workshops can offer giveaway items, such increase community-wide awareness as a bicycle, helmet, lights, or repair tools. and knowledge of how to safely share the Host Pedestrian and Bike Traffic Safety road with users of different transportation Fairs
modes. A campaign may include tabling
at community events, hosting educational Collaborate with local businesses or workshops, posting educational messages organizations to host an obstacle course on social media, installing informational to teach pedestrians and bicyclists how to signage at bus stops, on Omnitrans buses, identify different street signs and how to and other high-traffic public areas. use street infrastructure to increase safety.

Youth and children navigate the obstacle
Provide Family Bicycling Education course to win free helmets and lights.

Provide family-friendly interactive training Equity
and infrastructure tours to increase the
confidence of pedestrians and bicyclists. While this is a citywide Plan, it focuses on Participants can receive free helmets and improving mobility in the areas of Upland in bike lights and are taught about the bicycle greatest need of multi-modal transportation rules of the road and how to be visible and solutions and resources. The Plan aims to predictable when riding. address and remove barriers to the safe and easy use of active transportation and
Host Bicycle Safety Assemblies and public transit facilities for recreation and On-Bike Education at Schools transportation. In addition to constructing Encourage the Upland Unified School District projects in underserved areas,it is important to collaborate with local businesses or to integrate universal and accessible design organizations to provide on-bike education features into new projects to the greatest programs for students during physical extent possible. Efforts to advance equitable education and to host safety assemblies access to high-quality,well-maintained,and that teach students foundational safety enjoyable pedestrian, bicycle, and public information, including the rules of the road transit facilities are essential to a successful and how to safely walk and ride a bicycle. multi-modal transportation system.

Host Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety .,
Workshops yit, '. `¢y- ti +•. ;, -aa r, Collaborate with local businesses or _ - organizations to host workshops such as
"bike rodeos" that teach habits, skills, and
,�.� 0
tips for walking, hiking, and bicycling safely y .- and comfortably. Workshops can coverill. co lessons on street signs and infrastructure,
�- a
rules and responsibilities of the road, "on- . _
' y
- a
bike" maneuvers, and more. Giveaways, 1 -� ; _ N such as free helmets, bicycle lights, or E 21 reflective gear, can be provided to support A + o safe walking and bicycling. 1. o
ca
Host Bicycle Maintenance Workshops Encourage Public Involvement Collaborate with local businesses or Continue to engage community members a organizations to host bicycle maintenance throughout the Plan implementation and v workshops to teach riders how to fix and monitoring.

Consider the Transportation Needs of Enforcement
Traditionally Underserved Populations Pedestrian and bicycle-related collisions Recognize the importance of addressing the are often a result of road user error, such barriers that prevent trips from being safe, as a vehicle, pedestrian, or bicycle failing to especially for the youth, elderly, disabled, follow the rules of the road. While education and lower-income populations who cannot is an essential first step towards improving afford, operate, or choose to forgo vehicle collective understanding and awareness ownership. of how to properly share the road and interact with new active transportation
Prioritize Projects in Underserved infrastructure, enforcement can help Areas reinforce the importance of pedestrian and Implement improvements in areas that are bicycle safety. City staff can collaborate disproportionately affected by health and with the Police Department to ensure safety burdens, acknowledging that policies officers receive training on pedestrian and and designs that improve conditions for bicycle issues and solutions, as well as best vulnerable groups can benefit everyone in practices for enforcement. the community. - .

Distribute Walking, Hiking,and ` ic`
Bicycling Equipment ,. • .
•II
Secure funding to distribute free equipment
to support safe and easy walking, hiking,and .
bicycling in Upland. Equipment can include •
free bicycles, helmets, lights,first aid kits, etc.
*� 4. �1;.ri
r
Provide Language Translation .. -
Ensure that key messaging is translated to ._ ' .•--• 1 common non-English languages such as
Spanish and Mandarin.Follow guidelines that
may already exist at the City or Omnitrans.

MN
Collaborate with Law Enforcement to
Promote Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety
Partner with law enforcement to promote
apedestrian and bicycle safety.Collaboration
ix may include targeted enforcement to aeducate drivers, bicyclists, and pedestrians
Z about applicable traffic laws and the need L to share the road. This effort may include 0 developing a brochure or tip card explaining c each road user's rights and responsibilities and selecting a designated law enforcement
e liaison to address pedestrian and bicycle 2 safety issues and concerns.
0 Launch a "Share the Road"Campaign
- Educate motorists on how to share the road 0 with non-motorists and new bicycle and TD_Q pedestrian or traffic calming infrastructure.

This is particularly important for Class III
202 Page 547 of 707

bicycle routes on many streets throughout Evaluation
Upland that may be enhanced with traffic-
calming elements to create a bicycle Regular evaluation is necessary to maintain boulevard, which is a road that prioritizes and improve Upland's active transportation safe bicycle travel and where vehicles are and public transit facilities. Additionally, an invited guest, at lower speeds consistent sharing and addressing evaluation with California law. findings with the public can help promote transparency and accountability for the City.

Hold Speed Enforcement Campaigns The following examples include strategies Place speed feedback trailers at specific the City can use to evaluate and monitor programs and infrastructure.
locations where pedestrians and bicyclists
are frequently resent. Speed feedback - ;, ;: _ trailers help reduce speeding by warning 7
motorists of their current speed and -J'-` ilk -�, '�' instructing them to slow down if they are ' - i,, L _ ,,} going above the speed limit. - 1 ;, �:

Engineering • . r i
A variety of engineering tools can be used to - ,z:- •.� 1 make sure that the roadways in Upland are - �),,i Ti
designed to keep bicyclists and pedestrians -
safe at all times while maintaining efficient
travel throughout the city. Some of these - f- • z
tools include street design techniques that
are meant to reduce traffic congestion, Form a Regional Technical Advisory decrease vehicular speeds, and enhance Committee pedestrian and bicycle safety and comfort. Consider establishing a committee corn- When designing and constructing active posed of representatives from the neigh- transportation facilities, the City can refer boring cities of Rancho Cucamonga, La to design guidance from the California
Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Verne, and Claremont to advance contig- and the California Manual on Uniform uous and seamless multimodal improve- ments along Foothill Boulevard and Base-
Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD). line Road/16th Street. Regularly convening National organizations also guide best neighboring jurisdictions to discuss issues practices, such as the National Association and develop mobility solutions for Foothill of City Transportation Officials (NACTO), the
American Association of State Highway and Boulevard and Baseline Road/16th Street will Transportation Officials (AASHTO), and the facilitate a consistent, safe, and enjoyable Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). travel experience for all modes along some of the region's most important corridors.

Establish a Mobility Advisory co
s Committee
�.¢�- Consider creating a Mobility Advisory Corn- 0 Y �i : '` mittee to guide the ongoing implementa- a) �. � . tion of this Plan. Many municipalities, includ- ;.4:, ing the City of Rancho Cucamonga, have o
- - _r '"� _ - developed similar advisory committees to f address issues and opportunities related ca
- to walking, bicycling, and transit. This group
_ — can support City staff collaboration with res- a o
-- - r idents and community partners to address v ""—
-- -0 '" issues and monitor Plan implementation.

Review Collision Data Monitor and Maintain Mobility Facility Encourage the Police Department to Conditions monitor collision data, including existing Conduct regular monitoring of active data sources, such as the Transportation transportation and public transit facility Injury Mapping System and California conditions to identify areas in need of Traffic Safety Dashboard developed by UC maintenance, litter removal, beautification, Berkeley SafeTREC.Traffic collisions involving or improvement. Address safety concerns bicyclists and pedestrians should be and issues along facilities promptly to regularly reviewed and analyzed to develop maintain a safe and enjoyable active plans to reduce their frequency and severity. transportation and public transit experience Any such plans should include Police for community members.

Department involvement and be monitored
to determine their effectiveness. Consider Develop a Mobility Report Card creating an online collision dashboard that Develop a mobility report card to measure tracks key collision trends on an annual the success of the Plan's implementation. basis, which can also serve as a public The report card could be used to identify engagement tool. the magnitude of accomplishments in the Consider joining the Vision Zero previous year and general trends.The report Network card could include, but not be limited to, keeping track of system completion, travel
Vision Zero is a safety strategy aimed at by bicycle or on foot (counts), number of eliminating traffic fatalities and serious collisions, public transit ridership, etc. This injuries while promoting safe, healthy, and can be part of or complement an online equitable mobility for all. While there are collision dashboard, and both can be part specific steps to attaining Vision Zero - of a Vision Zero effort. such as the Mayor has publicly, officially
committing to the cause - this Plan has Partner with Upland Unified School elements that are a great first step on the District
road to Vision Zero. Develop a working partnership with the Conduct Bicycle and Pedestrian Upland Unified School District to evaluate bicycle and pedestrian safety around and
Counts leading to Upland schools. Forming a strong Conduct regular bicyclist and pedestrian relationship with the Upland Unified School counts throughout Upland to determine District can help to identify and address SRTS baseline mode share and subsequent needs and facilitate ongoing improvements. changes in travel behavior as the Plan is
implemented. In particular, conducting Establish a Process for Schools to u.
counts before and after constructing Report Safety Issues active transportation projects is essential to Establish a communication process that monitoring the impact of new improvements encourages students and parents to notify on travel patterns and behaviors. the school and law enforcement of the Additionally, bicycle and pedestrian counts occurrence of a crash or near-miss during 0 should be collected as part of existing traffic school commute trips involving auto, bus, counts. Data from counts can be used to pedestrian, or bicycle transportation. prioritize and justify projects when funding
2 is solicited and received. Results should be
regularly recorded for inclusion in a bicycle
o and pedestrian report card and shared
with applicable databases (e.g., Active
Transportation Database - ATDB.org).
0 Q
204 Page 549 of 707

..,"
*Illit. A
tr '3i'.• '
- ••••t-..•-,,'..,::441•••.-2; ...;,, • :Jr'. .7•,.....'i• .. .. : • ,t.•• r . ,.•-• ...•
• 1 • '-'••• •T1'-'•:'••:' ,'....''...1-.• .•. .n• • 1.1 I .i ,24..; •4'!
1 -...‘,:r-,.';...-.;:Citi:y...4:.,-P....1.N11/4.1*.r.r-:,'ll.l.:: -. ••• 4'1 ., 11'..1.1!.......4 . ' . -•' ''.(• . . .. ..
t • • ••
, 1,1' 4 • • , ,.•
— . I
.
. ..,
- •'4-'-- •-•'!i.•'• . -..s.••..i •- l-.-
•:,',..,ii:i".0'•.,- . ; ,,,,ri,i,,' ..',J.
•:" -•!•.e.ti: • , •'. • •• ... -r:3. 't
, • . ..
.0 .-• - 1
• e
. ......•. . 1N.
• . "' . . i ic)

4..... .f wir 1 ...,1.:- 4 '.” ' -*- • / a) •, .. . f CY)
i • --it v...,.',.._Sese,..•'' •''.4.. i•••• .P. . - :'llikt:• .. :• 1 cts . •1/44 1 7
- :,.;!!,1:'•;., .,i •„ ; .: ,‘.•••••••s- • , ;,.. ,,,,.,.1,..r. 0_ ^ . vs--./....•'-d,• " - - .1- .'t .4 i•f:' ...1
- -•• Niro , l .a :., .... . . . 1- * m.-- 4 • 4 A-4,, feel,.• pii' .'
.-.._ „or.: .....3..z•,,,lict. •., fit.
•- - -1..../4/ 1r 111.••-1....... '-'11. r . -.-. .
i
. ...
tr... .
. /...•-• ' •- ••' •r. %V • •‘•
.•,_,......• " • ••F• -:•, ....,6, .
p tr .,,,,s,.... .. t..i-r.,.. • .,
6 , . ....,..:•., , ......4
,, ..„.. ..., P ', . • if
a:" . -.....:. , ''• .4.4•:,`..... ;11•". Ai-'.7 . A -illl ..••r'...-.1P-' • . ......... _EV,o, - , . .A..-4 ..
.. • • - . .. .. .. i . • •,....„,„ ,,. , , -I
i ••• - . • 1,1' • ':. • - ,
• • .' L.•!
..•‘',' .4: , 1--. •
" .;,.. ..' • — -....... ..,./-, , • ....t. • I: . To..?; ••••-• Ir .•4'....,f a•'• • :. 1. • .

0.- . it ''..41•V'- I, '''!•
•-Yt•
.. -. a.
•. IV -.. 'W° • •AY
411. .... • ., . • ....
-.Li, .,• Ilk 4
—
.• • '/L. 1 •vik it•••• ... .• ,
•714.• -'• , .e.,----:... •
• .., ./ ..
....0 ;
4 - • • f V.—
,.....".......t,.. - ...,;,,,,,,i :r•-:.., , .., , •
. -........•'`'......14ji a-W.•
.,
4/1"d• rr illrlr •,i.. •- .i..1,, -,. • •if i .,At?:
. ...
.
. • - • •..- • IV r TO.'-; ..• .

Jg), . . •,
••'.• •-1' .
• ..tig_110..,• -sf.': •••• .t. te. .• • , .
• r) •
• .. . •i',4"14,
...'i 1. :,: %i."',(44 • i..
• •
.rV. .110."• .
r. tj •.f:21Ir , . 4'41,•....:(f.:v,ir?..',,"•41 .11 * .11. . -.--... l'• I •.• ..'.... C.1. • • 1
..., ..
. 4. .l•:.i•4C -
. . •• 4
.-, . . • ,, ...y-rk, •),.i.. OP '14 .
.tgr,„. , . •P0- . .4 I t it. 4'
ih..W.
1 . 'II rbillTri .
•ler.Ar,. - -et , .. . . .
. ...
- ..... _ .•4 ..•, •
._ k
.N,- Is'•
., •
•• ^ — et ,,f
j. .,1. 1". . •mil
.'4', . .-, ., •• -
1111111111111 r' ••:•.,
,... ... • .14e_Pr ,..•.,
..-. --a-.., • ..
..:` .
- . ir I • .. - 41t2T4Fr ''4.• . . .. • . . r Am_ ••..,••,.. • ••• - , . -ig
. E. 1.4 -" .....' . - .•-.•.• ,,..

1., it;014.".'11:11.- . • .r---.1 r'."k•07:-...,..- . • .._‘.)..g .-1 .!••••; ..0 6.40 ,. _ _... i . .,......_i_......e... , • . .;:•• _ • , - !,. - ." , . -•-'F '... • • •'•-...;•" ' i— :..•_. .....7• .. ..
_, .• .ly-P-•oi1 •. '.
' .... .-...,.-I•..•',A,lf_
• '•"•,. •... - ' .,,„,4, •.. 4 4..:-..•._...-:;...,...•.'.•.•. ...-••.,P•,,,.,,,.....t I,.•-.•..•.,.:.,..,,:i..-,....
..,.,..2i,...,•,,.. .. .
.,
rV
- . - ., -i-
. - • I#; I
,tiArNi, •_ ., .
.• .. r
" €‘111ak A.

V. ..•
• ...'. ...,d.f • •A
V- ,.=, -• , ,
: • . .17.::. .;.•... :.-

'.I.:
. .. - .
. • sir . r
, - Y "..... ).•••
'.. •' -. NI' 7-1L'.. _.
- .
-'. -...
li •.1 .•-•' -11111. -'. i .1411h,". -. )... . ...4. ! .
,,
— _. , ,
R -i II . i. _d.„-•
1 _
.L. lei
..,.
,..,._. . .., - S 1 ..' .v
- -.. .t. l''.. .
.,:+•&S. _ - ,..% . . • .
i \ ...-.V. .r.
- •..----,---, ,
1111 =7!=: 1-- . a• II ----- . 41,t.i. - i - IS _ \ . . y,. ' :ki."..:•-__.1!..,i- -"W. ..,. -- ...., iiii.. . .• . .. ..... J.L... 1. .4,9,.,/.._... 7.___ .- • _.. . :._...- /7--,r--'- - ' ' NVI1011/1411**Ik .
r ,
•; 9, :',.: _.--
• .'‘..•
... ..we.
_ _ —
-
.._. -- ' •-
•
--- ••.
_.---- —. ,
- • •
__•--
_.. imbw.a --
-.. .._. ,- -
r
.----40011111111111111111111111r . :•„,1.4E6.-..--% • • . .... .
---- ,---
• ... , —- ,„,-. .- - _: ` •:-.,4 r. .J - - . -.._. _...- -
. -'6....!Y' ', • -. 'f
_,.. i
. . 4... .,
-4•.. 01
• r Pk• ., 11 '4-..:'...
'
4 i.......•: .
. ,Y •-".
•-...1 ir4.7.-....%- ,..4-..2..,...•.. .
-% I ...--:!,..0-'•-:.....,
. _ • •: 7:.. _ ••
- t . . ..,-
-':.;•- ,...• • _.....- ..,' . .., -.
' - - ..-•
. . • ._ •,.. .1 0. .-. .
•
. .•
....--..r 'M.,.. 74
9- , .- r -• '
4 • .V. r , • ' ..
r• .4. •",,.. •,•,• :r . . I. .. .. • . ...4- -.•- - -! . .„ •
• • 41.'
• ' .4.e::. .•• '-••-•''...---.`;'--tt. -- . . - -, • -. . , . ,
, n •. - ',. .., . ... . . - • .• ..

1.11...11111!mw` -- 7 • -
f:-.,"• - '-'400-f•-•if"..,..:. ..-'': a..,. - 4. ._.• •,. : --L...„. .4;:', . • - . 7i-4 _
..
•
• . . ..4' .. R• . .-.7., 1...,1%.
. _oe:-.-- • • ,..-:_ . ' . ....'••• , . . ••••y 4 • • ' ' ;.•••S 4 "-. •. -......•
• . '''. . -":.• ' -..' 71 0,:... '-'f-0 I 1 r r 1 '''..'' ..'.•""' ' - 4''''' Li. ' • '..4`•-.. ••• •. ..;4-5)c/•-:i"3:-
...."". ..," ;....... ., .

J.‘j •r-..• • ' -- ' ._• . .
• • •••r..'-•
'''-' r- '-. .A---?,...„-irt.- 4:::.-",zpat:64" Al.-"•:-‘!" , ,.0-::: , . .-: •' , .'. -..4-',/ --:.P.r. . . --- - ..- '..„,s.1-,i,;..--4 .-4.esa-r-_;..4(.•:. -", ,iv-• - 'i - . '. ,' • . -
- .4. --''L, .-•'-'':-... ".''Ir- , . ,• ..,-- .(1,...i - -` ,- • ,-sio•-7"- ,-;...=.5.-0--7. . " ..„ '
' ... . -. -- 1`.•
/ ..,
_ /---
t
---. ..' .' "; . .-'1•,•'•-i4 .., ,.- ......, ... . ' .- ,.., .. f,
. . ' ',. 1404r= 441141.01.4 ...•
.• 4141/4M11111006..•
•
•

44. • .-, •'
...„ 4
r •. ' • •/..• - fr •, ' 4411WIP.' . 1
.4 ., r ; "
•
• „ 4"
'• ..4"./ ;..•...._.
• - 'JP.''•e a
... '•• • ' . ,
. „ • 0" .t
.
". ..•
.•" , •- •:.r. --- - . • r - J• . , ,• . • r . • •••,..,Y .- :•. -- ... .- •
. , . .... _.. - , -• .
- ` • .
. .., .
... ',.."''.-, f.' . :'• '''i!ir.,g,... ,. • , ...... ..,.i. •.• .. . • , , ..
..= ,-,,.. .... ..,,f• . " ,„4. _ i , ..,..z.:, . . ... ._
. „,. . .....‘ . ri'. * 0, . :.. . ': . . ,,-.. " :,,,,•. i , •., ' • ' '"`'fit."'." ',...4' -..' - ir, -.- ' "1• . ..-.' :14 di. • . • , ., ..--..,{- ...
i ' . . „,: . ''''''''-:'.,%-4,-...-7:' :".-, ..e4';. ' •...',!°; r. ,: -I'..11..4;''7...:41.044:' 14'. .4.1;•').•. ' •• -.„..:•. ":,. /....,-.. -i• :0. -. i -t. , .i: • . . ..1,..i. ...,., sv!,...ii.. . , p.P.% -. ...4

1.1 Ar.. . . .• . . . • 'r,r..,..:.....,':-'.......?'.. 1.P_,, ''.7.'?.i:.,ti, ..0 e .et.. .1• f.4i,d Tjkit: f,• .1• ,!--/*1.C.. '...rF ,1;,L,';',.,.p,i•.-...- ..,--- ; 4..., • • • r••14"0-:"•,;‘' ;''',•••• .‘••• • I ••'' , 9? -•.•liVr '`,p 1,„•t'.1 ,, --4,91:..:'- • N":°'ii:1 4•-', ,••• •. ,.
- •-•''.-'.-' —1. ' -- '' .•• •• •, Jr• 4 :Pr .,e. , ,,,. .•., . .$::.0.1 ..." .' V1)4 .9), ..• ..•. r., • ....• ! 1. . ! '.'.•'. . 6. VI ' •p Pii •.,r . .1:'''' .'. -.."(. '. . .'' . -1, ".. '' ...i .. •
•
• •,. . •',.'•,..).'..4) ,' • .'t .' ..• .% . , . ..1.4...1t, if .,./...y.1), ; ._ . ,,. . ,. ... - 4. '"'' ....“ .. .' "."1!../„:: ''''' .:.r, .''' i P • -IN • -. •.:'t d'hilr ,ci.-,..- - •,. .,•-•,... ', i .-., •. .i.. . ' ' .''' "e..',.-7 3.-•,,.,.,, _. .„.• -- .---!"•.:--• ar .... 1 1..;ki.':';'' t- ......e.Viv".-', • `-- ..", '. .,, - • . . .??,..01;fr .g.r it! — .•. ic ., '.''..fl, ' . it, .• ‘. K,Ittel11.1„;...• •. :-. ' i • -?• : a ' •'''.•..,--1 f
,e ..-1,`.^. `' .. ,
.r'• •-(''',,,,,6 ,..41'.4-.:, /,. / X•'!'..is' ..':.!_:.ai . Ni - • ,-. • "-,..-- • . , ... ..-.../-- '

r l
+ ++ l
li
• .1 tk...
i. ' 4/1111.111:4 ''''s :;:.' 1 1
i 1 . • ' ' • i" ' i N .,4 , I ' pi . .., - .i .; , , I;
i I
r
I .try 'i h 1.4 •.1 ; ' # ,�II' w #�' o \ /.„-.... ,,,,., L. .. ......,.
..t. . ,. .,, ,,;,,41.„)J: '11, I ..1. .,...-, ,- 1 1 i 4 ,,,.
.....„s,..,
sia ° 0 43)
{{ 41•y ......e
J/ l s ' 4 CCII-3C7)
•
�. d O its /' r,r:' .r. S ti r ,. ;4', 4. �' ♦ �. IIIII+ :Y { •
_ _ •:N �. +i.. �e°I.,,i, : is • tea' C E 2 la
'1:1 . - ' . . - ......- .,:s. l'i•-./":+L. ':1.1:I": . 1 . . .. :,- . ...."‘, `....;.....;.e.". .110._ .P. .F.i i. . T.' :
0 ''')„...— m— 1 1,.. ., .'.7.0.': ..

E .
: f : .
4--:).
. .%.,,,,.) .., -' ;.. .4 0 1
.p + t k. .. .:l ti rC ii:L cn e•.47 . '
-.1%1 f....e..;, ...g l'•
. ...,.... ip. ,, . , ,e
+ S , - r r .
,.,,,, E E0 0 2
•
g.
• > m aI a -
I O N a

CD N O
N g CD1. �;
•
= O = a + i .

V.

CD
•
!
7 -'a

4. Om i O • i,� • tic" 1 4 a 0.� bp, �� ag;
y r y i. x.= •
i .: }.
•
•
� 4� � :r ti-7, � -
jk
r .Y: Y
r.

Chapter 6 contains several items to
support the City's implementation of the
improvements proposed by this Plan,
including an implementation strategy,
updates to the General Plan and
Municipal Code, a funding source matrix,
and planning-level cost estimates and
conceptual drawings for segments of the
Plan's ten priority projects. The City can use
r these tools to apply for, secure, and allocate F , ' P funding to design and construct the mobility ,: "- improvements proposed in this Plan.
; A'� •... . a.. 6.1 IMPLEMENTATION
•
� d. ri .[
4- ;' ' STRATEGY
r i'i : Table 6 1 categorizes potential mobility • ..� - infrastructure projects by short-term (0 -.eb � '�. to 2 years), mid-term (2 to 5 years), and 'n 't . i _ - - long-term (5+ years) implementation timelines. The City can use Table 6-1 to
y Na _ '� guide project implementation and allocate rot.; ' = a 11resources as funding becomes available. q i This implementation table can be used i IIIII alongside the Funding Source Matrix, described below, to help make informed
1 i decisions about the types of projects the
FP, ~ . w-.ram_' :-
Town can explore pursuing.

Alk.- —
- ++ 17- Implementation Tip
The City has already identified several
'7' _-- - . roadway rehabilitation projects in its "0/ I CIP budget, which include repairing or 4 _ .iI � i upgrading roadway surfaces, curbs ! 1 and gutters, sidewalks, curb ramps,

0. / i7`+ - -' pavement markings, and more. To - •. streamline the implementation of
,'` r - this Plan, the City is encouraged to ���� ii - Y! integrate proposed infrastructure i ..a' `' = improvements, such as Class II bicycle lanes, Class IIB buffered bicycle lanes,
- _ Class III bicycle routes, and green i I transition striping,into existing roadway
4resurfacing and pavement marking
; i ,-` projects, where identified in this Plan.

The City is encouraged to review the
..- . ; ..:: infrastructure improvements proposed 71 -,- _ ,- . .
in this Plan and integrate them
i . -, , into maintenance and CIP projects , wherever possible to expedite Plan
`' $ � implementation.
-''- -At .. Page 553 of 707
4 =- _ -:- � = : . ,_.3,.....�.�-.`

Table 6-1: Implementation Timelines of Infrastructure Projects PROJECT T AMPLES OF INFRASTRUCTUR
ADA-compliant curb ramps with truncated domes
Sidewalk repair to uneven or cracked pavement
High-visibility crosswalks
Short-term projects
allow agencies to Pedestrian amenities (e.g., hydration stations, pet waste design and install stations, benches, street trees, and pedestrian-scale infrastructure lighting)
improvements that Bicycle amenities (e.g., bicycle racks, lockers, storage, Short-Term havepotential for y ( g y g (0-2 Years) and fix-it stations)
Quick-build faster execution,
projects, pilot strong community Transit stop amenities (e.g., benches, shelters, real-time projects,and support,and a bus information)
small-scale site significant impact Class II bicycle lanes, Class IIB buffered bicycle lanes, improvements. on the community. Class III bicycle routes Improvements
can typically be Green striping for bikeways (e.g., conflict striping through incorporated within intersections and high-volume driveways, bike boxes, the existing street and two-stage left turn boxes)
right-of-way.

Signage (e.g., regulatory,interpretive,and wayfinding)
Traffic calming measures (e.g.,speed feedback signs,
LED stop signs, reflective delineators,advanced warning signs)
Install bicycle racks at activity centers, such as Downtown Upland, the Colonies Shopping Center, and public buildings. Add amenities to the Pacific Electric Trail, Project including shade trees, seating, public art, etc. Include proposed Class II/IIB/III Example: bicycle facilities and high-visibility crosswalks on planned roadway rehabilitation projects (e.g., Campus Avenue, Mountain Avenue, Arrow Highway, and 14th Street).

Mid-term projects are Class I multi-use paths
intended to impact Class IV separated bikeways
corridors, not just spot
locations,and are Protected intersections
evaluated against
Mid-Term other system-wide Raised curb extensions (2-5 Years) improvements.These Sidewalk gap infill
Corridor projects may have
improvements minor impacts on a Pedestrian hybrid beacons (PHBs) and roadway street's right-of-way,
modifications. utility easements, Traffic signal modifications (e.g., leading pedestrian or contain other intervals,crossing time modifications, bicycle signals, C constraints that bicycle detection devices)
may need to be Traffic calming measures (e.g., neighborhood traffic C evaluated before calming circles/mini roundabouts,speed cushions, E implementation. raised crosswalks) U)
Q
Install proposed Class IV separated bikeway along Foothill Boulevard. Install - Project proposed Class I multi-use path along Euclid Avenue (south of Foothill Example: Boulevard).
m
a
0 0

kPR• ECT TYPE DESCRIPTION EXAMPLES OF INFRASTRUCTURE joil.

Long-term projects New traffic signals
Lon Term require extensive
9 planning and Roundabouts
(5+Years) resources for
Corridor and Grade-separated crossings (e.g., pedestrian bridges, implementation.
system-wide underpass tunnels etc.)
improvements These projects require
with extensive more attention in Utility relocation/additions planning the engineering and Right-of-way acquisitions and civil design phases, or
include the need for
engineering coordination with
components adjacent agencies or Road diets or expansions governing bodies.

Project Conduct a road diet along San Antonio Avenue and install proposed Class IV Example: separated bikeway.

6.2 UPDATES TO THE GENERAL PLAN
To ensure consistency between the Upland Mobility Master Plan and the City's General Plan Circulation Element, the following updates are recommended:
► Update the policies shown in Table 6-2 using the recommended modifications. ► Update Figure Cir-2 Bicycle Routes to reflect the existing and proposed bicycle facilities shown in Figure 5-16 of this document.
► Consider reclassifying streets in alignment with any future reductions to posted speed lim- its. Street reclassifications would require updating Figure Cir-1 Roadway System.

Table 6-2: Updates to the General Plan Circulation Element

IRCULATION
ELEMENT RECOMMENDED MODIFICATION
•OLICY
Bicycle System.Implement and maintain a comprehensive bicycle system pursuant to the City's Bicycle and Pcdestrian Master Plan Mobility Master Plan,the Policy CIR-2.8 San Bernardino County Non-Motorized Transportation Plan and Caltrans standards to reduce slope, sharp curves,and interference from vegetation, pedestrians,and motor vehicle traffic. Guidance from NACTO and AASHTO may also be referenced. aBicycle Facilities. Incorporate bicycle facilities into the design of land use plans and capital improvement projects,including:
aa. End of trip facilities (bicycle lockers, showers,where feasible,and changing rooms) within non-residential sites, including transit stations; T.

Policy CIR-2.9 b. Bicycle parking within new multi-family and non-residential sites, including o transit stations. Bicycle parking includes, but is not limited to bicycle racks, storage lockers,and storage rooms;
a)
c. Publicly accessible bicycle parking and repair stations; and, 2 d. Signage and pavement markings for all bicycle routes.

Pedestrian System.Maintain a network of sidewalks,crosswalks,and other Policy CIR-2.10 pedestrian facilities throughout the City as specified in the City's Mobility Master Plan and the County's Non-Motorized Transportation Plan,in accordance with the Americans with Disability Act (ADA) and other relevant accessibility guidelines. a
Safe Routes to School.Collaborate with local school districts and private schools to identify and implement safety measures to improve safe travel to and from schools Policy CIR-3.3 for students, parents,and school employees. See safety measures identified in the 210 City's Mobility Master Plan. Page 555 of 707

6.3 UPDATES TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE
For many people, particularly children, riding a bicycle on the street, directly adjacent to cars, does not feel safe. In instances where separated or off-street bicycle facilities are absent, sidewalks can offer a more comfortable place to ride a bicycle. However, the City's Municipal Code (§ 12.16.070) prohibits riding a bicycle on sidewalks. Additionally, the Municipal Code requires bicycle registration before riding, which is widely considered to be an outdated and hard-to-enforce regulation that creates hurdles for residents interested in riding a bicycle.

To remove barriers to riding a bicycle in Upland,the updates shown in Table 6-3 to the Upland Municipal Code are recommended.

Table 6-3: Updates to the Municipal Code
UPLAND
MUNICIPAL RECOMMENDED MODIFICATION
CODE
Riding bicycle on sidewalk.

No person shall ride a bicycle upon any of the public sidewalks within the limits of the city of Upland.Whenever any person is riding a bicycle upon a sidewalk,such person §12.16.070 shall yield the right-of-way to any pedestrian and shall give an audible signal before overtaking and passing such pedestrian. At the intersection of two or more sidewalks,where the vision of the operator of a bicycle is restricted,the operator of a bicycle shall dismount and walk through the intersection of the sidewalks.

Chaptcr 10.64 Repeal and remove Chapter 10.64
No person shall-operate or use a bicycle or motorized bicycle upon any of the streets or ways of thc city without first registcring the samc and obtaining from thc chicf propclled by human powcr as defined or referred to in the Vehicle Code, but not required to be registered thereunder,and shall be given its ordinary application and §10.64.010
fully operativc pedals for propulsion and an automatic transmission with an enginc which produces less than two gross brake horsepower as defined or referred to in the Vch;eIc-C—edc t of required-te-bc-r-cgistcrcd-t-hcrcundcr,and s-19a-1-1-13c-g-ivc-n its ordinary application and mcaf+ng-T--he provisions of this chaptcr shall apply to all persons residing in the city, and to such others who may commonly operate bicycles or motorized bicycles upon its public ways.

The chicf of policc is authorizcd and dircctcd to rcgistcr all such bicycles and motorized bicycles and issue licenses upon written application therefor,and in each §10.64.020 instance the license shall be effective for three years commencing January 1,1979.

Thereafter, in every instance,the license shall be subject to renewal every thrcc years that thc bicycic or motorizcd bicycic is used upon thc streets and ways of the city. c The fee for the registration shall be set by council resolution from time to time. c
a)
E
a)
Q
E
a
m
a
0 U

N Upland Mobility Master Plan FINAL DRAFT
N.)
n z -co
_
00Z
m n 0
r
41 o
' ' u , ' • ° ' , •' • , ° ' 41 '• , ' a.IP
' ° a• „ .' „ „ ' •, a' . , ; 4, , u a. , , , °• r' , ° ' ' „ ' • o ., , ' y 1 , , al
• 1 1 ' , 4
41 ' , , u u �' , , , , •' , '' , �,' , „ ' a , , r . , , ° u. ° . , „' . ° , , u 41 ' ., 4' u r u ° ..
. " ' • u ' , r .1 ' , .1 �', ° U u ' ° , u „ 41 , r r ° " ' , 41 • •' ' ' , r �' ° U' ., ° ° ° ' ' ". i. ,,' " �' �' o u „ „ u ' , ' u • , , , ° • , ' .' .,' , „ ° , ° 4' , ' •' ' ' ° " . , ° , , R1 o „ ' • i •' " 4' '. °" . ° , . ,• O ' a ° ° , , •' ,
0 . 0 •' ; •
.' , r ' , ' ,' 41 ' . ° ° a: ° ° •, , ° " ' ° ' " ' • ° " ' ' ' ' ' ID " ,u ' ' u O ' „ ' r ° , ° E„ 41 °' , , , r u „ „ , u , u 0 CP
u ' ' •' i °• ° ' ° ' ' 0. ' 0 „• , ' ° ° ' , •' ' , , , " ' ° •, . a u , „ , u , , , , ' u „ , a r , a
., .. ., 0
•, ,
a:
, •,' a' ' u
il
., .' �, • , ' . , ' , ., , r , , ' ., ° , .1 .1' , „ .1 . ., ., , •, , ' , ° , ' ., ., a ' ,
• ' 0
• , ' ' ' ' ° .,
° ' O ' ' °' ' '
Ill, a ' ' ' �' a, a, ° , '
i. '. ° „ , ° r ., , ' •, ° •' •, , ' . u
., 4, '•
.' .' , , :
, r ' u , • ' , . , ' I, 41 ' {u r ' a ' , " ' , ' , ; ' , ' , ' ° • 4, , .' i ' ° ' CO •r , . ' ° ° ' a ° .' ° a ° ° ° .' ° ° 0 v -
O
v

6.4 FUNDING SOURCES
Each year, federal, state, and local government agencies invest millions of dollars in active transportation, trails, and public transit projects nationwide. Table 6-4 contains an extensive list of potential federal, state, and local funding opportunities that may be used for a wide range of complete streets projects.

Funding sources for mobility projects vary in purpose and scope, but are intended to help the City plan,design,maintain,and implement projects and programming.The City is encouraged to use Table 6-4 to identify and pursue grant funding to implement this Plan. However, it is important to note that all funding sources are subject to change, and further research will be necessary to apply for grant funding, as not all funding sources apply to the recommended projects.

Table 6-4: Funding Source Matrix
JECT PROJECT
•OGRAM SOURCE DESCRIPTION CYCLE �'
PLN EXAMPLES

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS
The Congestion
Mitigation and Air
Quality Improvement •Travel Demand
Program provides Management to
funding to State and promote clean
local governments for
Congestion transportation projects commutes
Mitigation and and programs to help • Public Federal Highway Education and
Air Quality Administration meet the requirements Annual X X Outreach Improvement of the Clean Air • Bicycle Program* Act.The program
supports surface amenities and
transportation projects facilities,such as
and other efforts that Class I,II,Ill,&IV
contribute to air quality bike lanes
improvement and
congestion relief.
• Install hybrid
pedestrian
The Highway Safety signals at trail
Improvement Program crossings
funds work on any • Install RRFBs
public road or publicly at locations
Highway Safety Federal Highwayowned bicycle or adjacent to Improvement Administration pedestrian pathway Annual X parks,trails,and Program* Caltrans or trail,or on tribal schools lands for general use • Improve
of tribal members,that pedestrian and o
improves the safety for bicycle safety at
its users. locations with c
uncontrolled o
crossings cp
*Note: Program is funded through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, also known as the Infrastructure Investment E and Jobs Act (IIJA), and does not have permanent, entitled funding. The IIJA would need to be renewed or reau- thorized for the program to continue past 2026.
a
0 * INF - Infrastructure PLN - Planning and Design PGM - Programming U

PROJECT TYPE PROJEC
PROGRAM SOURCE DESCRIPTION CYCLE
N PM. EXAMPLES
The BUILD grant
program provides
grants for surface
transportation
infrastructure projects
with significant local or
regional impact.The
eligibility requirements • Multi modal
Better Utilizing and multi-
of BUILD allow project
Investments U.S. jurisdictional
to Leverage Department of sponsors,including Annual X X projects that are Development Transportation state and local more difficult to (BUILD)* governments,counties, fund than other Tribal governments,
transit agencies,and grant programs.
port authorities,to
pursue multi-modal
and multi-jurisdictional
projects that are more
difficult to fund through
other grant programs.
• Eligible
Implementation
Grant projects
include
developing
bikeway
networks,safety
treatments,
creating safe
The Safe Streets and routes to school
Road for All program and public
funds regional,local, transit services,
and Tribal initiatives installing
Safe Streets U.S. through grants to pedestrian safety and Road for All Department of prevent roadway Annual X X X enhancements, (SS4A)* Transportation deaths and serious closing network injuries.The program gaps,running
offers two grant types: an education
Implementation Grants campaign,and
and Planning and more.

Demonstration Grants. • Eligible
u.

Planning and
Demonstration
p Grants fund the
development or
Z supplementation
LL of a
0 comprehensive
safety action
a) plan.
4J
o *Note:Program is funded through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law,also known as the Infrastructure Investment and 2 Jobs Act(IIJA), and does not have permanent, entitled funding. The IIJA would need to be renewed or reauthorized for the program to continue past 2026.
0 2
D
C
0 Q
* INF - Infrastructure PLN - Planning and Design PGM - Programming 214 Page 559 of 707

PROJECT TYPE PROJECT
PROGRAM SOURCE DESCRIPTION CYCLE
PLN EXAMPLES
• Pedestrian and
bicycle facilities
• Construction
of turnouts,
overlooks,and
viewing areas
• Community
improvements
The Transportation such as historic
Alternatives Set-Aside preservation
Transportation from the Surface and vegetation Alternatives Federal Highway Transportation Block management Set-Aside Administration Grant Program Annual X X • Environmental (TASA)* provides funding for mitigation
a variety of generally related to
smaller-scale stormwater
transportation projects. and habitat
connectivity
• Recreational
trails
• Safe Routes to
School projects
•Vulnerable
road user safety
assessments
The Urban and
Community Forestry
Program delivers
nature-based solutions
to ensure a resilient
and equitable tree
canopy in cities, • Urban tree
towns,and suburbs planting projects
where more than 84 • Urban forest
Urban and percent of Americans planning and Community U.S.Forest live.40 percent of the management Forestry Service program's investments Annual X X and related Program are delivered through activities established and (particularly in
new partnerships disadvantaged
working to support communities)
disadvantaged
communities
experiencing low
tree canopy and
environmental justice
issues.
c
*Note:Program is funded through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law,also known as the Infrastructure Investment and •° Jobs Act �JA), and does not have permanent, entitled funding. The IIJA would need to be renewed or reauthorized for the program to continue past 2026.
cp
w
Q
E
em
0 a
0 * INF - Infrastructure PLN - Planning and Design PGM - Programming U

PROJECT TYPE PROJECT
PROGRAM SOURCE DESCRIPTIO CYCLE

PLN PGM EXAMPLES

STATE GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS
The Active
Transportation
Program provides
funding to increase
use of active modes
of transportation by
achieving the following
goals: increase the
proportion of trips
accomplished by • Safe Routes to
biking and walking, School Plan
increase safety and •Active
mobility for non- Transportation
Active motorized users, Plan
Transportation Caltrans Annual X X X development Program (ATP) advance active •Trail
transportation efforts
to achieve greenhouse construction
gas reduction goals, • Bicycle and
enhance public pedestrian
health,ensure that facilities
disadvantaged
communities fully
share in the benefits
of the program,and
provide projects that
benefit various types of
active transportation
users.
•Class I,II,Ill,&IV
bike lanes
•Active
The Affordable Housing transportation
and Sustainable projects to
Communities encourage
Affordable Strategic Growth Program funds connectivity to Housing and Council and land use,housing, transit networks Sustainable Department of transportation,and • Bikeways Communities Housing and land preservation Annual X X and sidewalks Program Community projects to support to affordable housing and
Q (AHSC) Development infill and compact
development that transit center
G reduce greenhouse • Install
dedicated
Zgas emissions. bicycle facilities
Z • Pedestrian
facilities such as
bulb-outs
a3
4J
0 2
0 2
D
C
0 * INF - Infrastructure PLN - Planning and Design PGM - Programming 216 Page 561 of 707

PROJECT TYPE PROJECT
PROGRAM SOURCE DESCRIPTION CYCLE
• EXAMPLES
The Clean Mobility
Options Pilot Program
provides funding for
zero emissions shared • Bikeshare
mobility projects programs
Clean Mobility (i.e.,car sharing,bike •"Quick build" Options Pilot California Air sharing and on- Varies X X right-of- Program Resources Board demand sharing) way safety in disadvantaged improvements
and low-income for bicycles and
communities,including scooters
some tribal and
affordable housing
communities.
• Provide coastal
experiences for
communities
The Coastal who face barriers
Conservancy funds a to coastal access
wide variety of projects •Accessibility
along the California projects that
coast,San Francisco reduce barriers
Bay,and in coastal to coastal access
State of watersheds to increase for people with Coastal availability of beaches, disabilities Conservancy California parks and trails for the Ongoing X X X • Build regional Grants Coastal public,protect and trails Conservancy restore natural lands • Enhance and wildlife habitat, coastal
preserve working recreational
lands,and increase amenities,such
community resilience as restrooms,
to the impacts of parking,
climate change. picnic areas,
interpretive
centers,shade
structures,etc.

The Habitat
Conservation Fund
provides funding • Build new trails
to cities,counties, • Rehabilitate
and districts to existing trails
protect fish,wildlife, • Install
California and native plant interpretive trail Habitat elements
Conservation Department resources;to acquire Annual X X • Install seating Fund Program of Parks and or develop wildlife or lighting along Recreation corridors and trails; trails
and to provide for • Develop
nature interpretation 0
educational
programs and other c
programs which bring or interpretivea
urban residents into activities or trips a)
a)
park and wildlife areas. -
m
a
0 * INF - Infrastructure PLN - Planning and Design PGM - Programming 0

PROJECT TYPE PROJECT
[PROGRAM SOURCE DESCRIPTION CYCLE
PLN �_ EXAMPLES
• Land acquisition
for a new park,
an existing
park expansion,
The Land and Water a wildlife
Conservation Fund corridor with
provides funding for public viewing
California and outdoor
the acquisition OR
Land and Water Department development of land to recreational Conservation of Parks and conserve irreplaceable Annual X X use,and/or a Fund Recreation/ lands and to create recreational/ National Park new outdoor recreation active Service opportunities for the transportation health and wellness of corridor
Californians. • Development
of recreation
features and
amenities
for outdoor
recreation
The Local Partnership • Close sidewalk
Program provides gap,install Class
funding to counties, II bike lanes
cities,districts,and and cycle track,
regional transportation curb extensions,
agencies in which pedestrian
voters have approved enhancements,
fees or taxes dedicated improvements
solely to transportation to lighting and
Local California improvements or that signage have imposed fees, • Construct 4
Partnership Transportation including uniform Annual X X single-lane and Program Commission developer fees, 1 multi-lane dedicated solely roundabouts,
to transportation and
improvements.Funding improvements to
is intended to improve street,pedestrian
aging Infrastructure, and bicycle
road conditions,active facilities
transportation,transit • Expressway
and rail,health and pedestrian
u.
safety benefits. overcrossing
Q
G • Implement
enhanced
Zcrosswalk signing
L The Local Streets and striping
and Roads Program • Create safety
provides funds to cities separation
cp cp Local Streets California and counties for basic between motorists,
and Roads Transportation road maintenance, Annual X X bicyclists and Program Commission rehabilitation,and
pedestrians
critical safety projects • Design and
on the local streets and construction of
roads system. school access
and safety
improvements to
six schools
Q
* INF - Infrastructure PLN - Planning and Design PGM - Programming 218 Page 563 of 707

PROJECT TYPE PROJEC
PROGRAM SOURCE DESCRIPTION CYCLE
.11= PIN J EXAMPLES
The Office of Traffic
Safety Grant Program
provides annual
funds to prevent • Safety
serious injury and education and
Office of Traffic death resulting from encouragement Safety Grant California Office motor vehicle crashes Annual X X • Campaigns to Program of Traffic Safety so that all roadway promote safety users arrive at their • SRTS safety
destination safely. programs
Funds can be used for
bicycle and pedestrian
safety.

The Outdoor
Recreation Legacy
Partnership Program
is a federal National
Park Service grant
program administered
by the California
Department of Parks
and Recreation.

ORLP focuses on • Land acquisition
National Park communities with little for outdoor Outdoor recreation
Recreation Service (NPS)/ to no access to publicly • Development Legacy California available,close-by, Annual X X of recreation Partnership Department outdoor recreation features and Program of Parks and opportunities in amenities Recreation urban areas.ORLP
funds the acquisition for outdoor
or development of recreation
new parks/outdoor
spaces,or substantial
renovations to parks/
outdoor spaces
in economically
disadvantaged cities
or towns of at least
30,000 people.

REAP 2.0 seeks to
accelerate progress
toward state housing • Sidewalks
goals and climate • Bicycle lanes
California commitments.REAP Note: • Mobility hub Regional Early Department of 2.0 funds support infill REAP 2.0 • Complete housing development, funds streets
Action Planning Housing and X X X
Grants (REAP) Development/ reduce vehicle miles have improvements SCAG traveled,increase been • Electric vehicle o housing supply,and allocated (EV) carports a implement adopted •Transit pass
regional and local voucher program ap
plans to achieve these w
goals.
m
a
a
0 * INF - Infrastructure PLN - Planning and Design PGM - Programming

PROJECT TYPE PROJEC
PROGRAM SOURCE DESCRIPTION CYCLE

PLN PGMIK EXAMPLES
The Recreational Trails
Program (RTP) is a
federal U.S.Department • Land acquisition
U.S. of Transportation grant • Development/ Department of program administered rehabilitation of Transportation by the California trails,trailheads, Recreational Federal Highway Department of Parks and trail Trails Program Administration and Recreation.The Annual X amenities (RTP) /California RTP provides funding to • Construction of Department develop and maintain new trails
of Parks and recreational trails and • Maintenance Recreation trail-related facilities of existing trails for both non-motorized (motorized
and motorized projects only)
recreational trail uses.
• Upgrade
sidewalks to ADA
The State Highway compliance
Operations and • Reconstruct
Protection Program damaged
State Highway funds repairs pavement
• Add bike lanes
Operations California and preservation, to updated and Protection Transportation emergency repairs, Biennial X corridors Program Commission safety improvements, • Upgrade (SHOPP) and some highway
operational pedestrian
improvements on the push buttons,
State Highway System. refresh striping,
and improve
pedestrian and
bicycle access
• Bike/ped
Overcrossing
The State and Access
Transportation Improvements
Improvement Program and bicycle
State and pedestrian
California provides funding
Transportation bridge
Transportation for state highway Biennial X X Improvement •Class I,II,Ill,&IV
Program (STIP) Commission improvements,intercity bike lanes rail,and regional
• Shared-use
u. highway and transit
improvements. paths
G •Complete
Streets
improvements
Z
T.
c
a
aJ
0 2
0 0
c
0 220 * INF - Infrastructure PLN - Planning and Design PGM - Programming Page 565 of 707

PROJECT TYPE PROJECT
PROGRAM SOURCE DESCRIPTION CYCLE

EXAMPLES
The Sustainable
Transportation
Planning Grant • Safe Routes to
Program was School Plan
created to support •Active
the Caltrans Mission: Transportation
Plan
Provide a safe and • Bike/ped Trail/
reliable transportation
network that serves all Path Feasibility
Sustainable Study
people and respects
Transportation • Complete
Planning Grant Caltrans the environment. Annual X Streets Plan Program The Sustainable • Sustainable
Transportation
Planning Grant Communities
Program includes Plan
the Sustainable •Transit Oriented
Communities Grants, Development
Climate Adaptation Plan
Planning Grants, • First/Last Mile
and the Strategic Connectivity Plan
Partnership Grants.

The Wildlife
Conservation Board
provides funding
for fish and wildlife
habitat acquisition, •Open-space
conservation,and corridors or trail
restoration,as well linkages
as planning and • Publicly
development of accessible
compatible public hunting,
access facilities. fishing,wildlife
Wildlife Wildlife Project benefits viewing,and Conservation Conservation should include one or Ongoing X X other wildlife- Board Grants Board more of the following: dependent recreational
protected biodiversity, opportunities
increased climate •Climate
resilience,enhanced
adaptation
public access, and resilience
conserved/enhanced
projects
working landscapes, • Habitat
conserved/enhanced
restoration
water-related projects,
and/or support of the
State Wildlife Action
Plan.
c
0 0
c
a)
E
a
m
a
0 0
* INF - Infrastructure PLN - Planning and Design PGM - Programming Page 566 of 707 221

PROJECT TYPE PROJECT
PROGRAM SOURCE DESCRIPTION CYCLE

INF PLN PGM EXAMPLES

REGIONAL PROGRAMS
SBCTA oversees
the disbursement • Safe Routes
of 2%of the Local to School
Transportation Funds and Active
(LIE) made available Transportation
to counties and cities Plans
for facilities geared •Construction
Transportation San Bernardino toward the exclusive and Development County use of pedestrians and maintenance Act (TDA) Transportation bicyclists.80%of LTF Biennial X X X of bicycle paths Article 3 Authority would be available for and sidewalks (SBCTA) pedestrian and bicycle •Transit stop projects,and 20% improvements
would be available for like wayfinding
projects that improve signs,trash
access to transit receptacles,
stops for pedestrians shelters,benches,
and persons with etc.
disabilities.

PHILANTHROPIC PROGRAMS
• Painted curb
The Asphalt Art extensions,
Initiative grant pedestrian
Asphalt Art Bloomberg program is designed plazas,and Initiative Philanthropies to fund visual art on Annual X X crosswalks. roadways,pedestrian • Public space
spaces,and public activations
infrastructure. •Traffic safety
improvements
The Community
Change Grants
program supports
the growing network •Trail or
of advocates, walking path
organizations,and development
agencies working to •Guided or self-
Community America Walks advance walkability. Annual X X guided walking, Change Grants Grants are awarded hiking,or cycling u. to innovative and tours
inclusive programs • Design and
p and projects that installation of
create change and public art
Z opportunity for walking
L and movement at the
community level.
a
aJ
0 2
0 c
0 * INF - Infrastructure PLN - Planning and Design PGM - Programming 222 Page 567 of 707

PROJECT TYPE PROS
PROGRAM SOURCE DESCRIPTION CYCLE =
'hNF PLN FENEXAMPL
•Community
event or class
The Community (one time or
Spark Grant program series)
supports the •Giveaways for
growing number bike equipment
of local grassroots •Temporary
Community League of demonstration
changemakers
Spark Grant American Annual X project and organizations
Program Bicyclists • End-of-trip
nationwide working
to improve their facilities such as
communities through bike racks,bike
better bicycling with parking,bike
$2,000 mini-grants. repair stations
and bike storage
• Bike audit/
count
•Trail building
or restoration
projects
Quadratec offers small • Park
one-time grants for beautification
Energize the projects that promote events Environment Quadratec environmental Annual X • Environmental Grant Program connection, education
responsibility,and/or projects
stewardship. •Youth
educational
engagement
events
Yamaha provides
funding to non-profit
or tax exempt groups •Trail
(clubs&associations), development
public riding areas •Trail signage
(local,state and •Trail mapping/
federal),outdoor map production
enthusiast associations •wildlife
Outdoor Access and land conservation and habitat Initiative Yamaha organizations,and Quarterly X management communities with an • Establishing
interest in protecting, public access to
improving,expanding land for outdoor
and/or maintaining recreation
access for safe, (including
responsible and motorized
sustainable use by recreation)
motorized off-road o
vehicles. a
c
a)
a)
Q
m
Q
0 * INF - Infrastructure PLN - Planning and Design PGM - Programming 0

PROJECT TYPE PROJECT
PROGRAM SOURCE DESCRIPTION CYCLE

N PGM EXAMPLES
Es
• Bike paths,
lanes,trails and
The PeopleForBikes bridges
Community Grant • Mountain bike
Program supports facilities
PeopleForBikes bicycle infrastructure • Bike parks and Community PeopleForBikes projects and targeted Annual X pump tracks Grant Program initiatives that make • BMX facilities it easier and safer for • End-of-trip
people of all ages and facilities such as
abilities to ride. bike racks,bike
parking,bike
repair stations
and bike storage
Placemaking means
many things to
different people,
but the National
Association of Realtors •Amenities
(NAR) looks as (street furniture,
splacemaking as a way paint,materials,
e,
National materials,,
Placemaking to make communities
Association of Annual X X landscaping,
Grant Program Realtors better places to live murals,etc} by transforming
unused and underused • Site
sites and"eyesores" preparation
into welcoming •Artist fees
destinations accessible
to everyone in a
community.

Rails to Trails
provides funding to • Rail-trail
Rails to Trails organizations and •Greenway Grant Program Rails to Trails local agencies that are Annual X X • Multi-use trail working to develop and • Shared-use
connect equitable trail path
network.

I-
L
CI
Q
Z
c
O
j3
+J
O
2 O
2 D
C
a
Q
224 Page 569 of 707

-1-.-- f i
.j..•
filf
ipi.11, _All
. .
• r.oir - . -. I
,.- •• ,
- d
- -
. ,
-.,
„-'-. • '
.--- -
---
..
.I
2:-\,..5 ''-'•-.- .
•
.
z.,1 ."4r.`-'*"-r - p Al -
i .
•
i . - :-. ' , jp„.- -•:,,,_
' .. --- . •,- . , :Pf ..‹,,,r. ‘..:.
''
'- - ' - -...1s•••• '-':;•:.:S,- '''''''''''-?.:- -..• ,:.± :.41-,'-'-"--'' --4.41.7%0•. .-
illi•V ___.".40'.•-•••- .. .
-lik4-L.'.,•,.i-F41. ''• ..,,4,— % .- , _---
,
• ''-..*;-A.'..:., -•--e4r.,,J...- ,-.......,:,.1=',..,-.: . ...,.....A.,.... ,-,....
.,,,.. 7 ':-.A--_, -:•?' 7:--14:..,:f.:--.N.:•g,..-12,.:,-:.-:_ v,,. . t 8 .... ,. r (' 't •
-...'•••' ; r..•-7till :- :•±"-"'.!:,g;'-- ,.."t.: ''''.''-'2-I:0'l' ''--?'• '-1 ' ''''
- - '...• i '-..14'.2-.r•aN: Mrir...„,NLI 0 -•V.541.- . ' '''' '. •'- '', r?. __Pf-. !v., ii,p0AT,'. . it. -' .1 ..,-.:•a., .,.-p.-.,-.0,.-.- 4, t .... . ' .'•1;. . ____- re....• .41,1-ffi 4... ,, 42, ....i....4,..•., . _.... -01 _,11, 1; ,,J, ir ...r. ._ r !,.......: ..1:1 ',.. ..1_y .,4•I -",-,.. 1 .: .., . ill r.'4-1".• .ieli-17'03.J.te i•- '' '' ' •..`.., ••. . _ . • . , ';.".:-. , . i7.1!hr,i• . ,SO-V•Ii.0:11A :', ' ' - N'• ''.1.' l',..;•..,lr do 1 . . .... i. ,a'sr'!-X-r•:i„,,%-...eL.^:-.':4,..'E-lidi-W—.-- ' •4-- .
ir .• . 1 i. .... _ f..-....4, N[r...000.„,,,„..„ - ,c...-r../..7.1„...L..."-- --.
..„. .
.., x ±, '„, : .- . 0 ...-.. 1 iv, •P.-4 - -;'''''t - ."'". a. i '.7 -z ''''' - - -..'' ill ...--;4,-EL, '• •,% _ . .-_,..t.#1 _, .,
4 . -
1,4 FP_44
-5(r_lc AP ff'..-1 • . 't_ , r. _
.. 7.-:' -- - • • -.,„ tik .. _ ..._ • .3,..._
---
:-...
. --: - .. -=.--- ---.-7---_-_
.,.
. _ . .111.__....._mdmi..
: _ .. •••• 71Ea.___6., --
.••
.--..".,' ...._ .._ ..._
-.- •
-- -
';t$.F..:.;11.3f:P;',X"A:a;;;:pr•/5Z0
_ .
..r.,T.Ip-4.*011:.,_'..1.......::;47-r...F.'' • - - ., _ ' _ ::An+L'4:7-:'
- -
_.....
, .
- _ • .
- _-..__ --5 .. -r- ---:-.4.,..4....:-......,,,e- -,---rr,, --... .--.--. -.7•Is- ,-,...-. ..:. -.-.7._. . _ - - -.-___L---_--.LL..2-.-.:::;,-',,-,_c.:,,,--._.;.. - Et,. . • - - - - - -''.--- ‘-'''''1--- --' . -- . ,
. .
% -...f"...."-.. r , _.
-..+. ......,
.....
. . .....-,'..

IR'. _
-. -..
..
•'7 .1-• ..'
- .- •
,
. ..
s.,,_.2„._1.7-;••:',.. r,-. - '
L..,
r ••12.e4....Will . I. :'"r
•. .%a'1 .3 41161V. .''' • :r AO"'•'...,,•ir .te,.410111r: 'L'OrAtkitrl; *`:•‘:t.''.4-lir:;• ' ' ,•
..
-, ._.:*4;r•4..,.1.'li', -.' • .. ...,,
'r 4 ,'LI ' -1.--. ' . . .•
,_.qt., ,.• • . .. . Y jUlkil,,,, • -• - • - -
• •'r r' i." -..1_7:•:4.414:1('
. , . 1:_: . •,-...4-.. . .-...:. . AO! ' -,..---• . .04 „ , ,

1111E101111P ' - ',.t-c•!,'
i__ . ... ,
4•;.. :: c)•.j,.
•._: ,
...? -.,•;.-';1' .- •
. '
if;,# .. •., ,_,
':.•-•'. •
.4.1116,111 ...." r ieb
...05..„..,.:::i.5.I•.,:-•I'';'.....'!-'1:: i ' '""!'::-1.:731':::---L':'.▪ .:
,„•.:: )..7•:::-...ti. :•!: Ns NI'
.-• :II*/._ 4 <•1:::::.',,-;'':':
' . , . . • :-
i . , : -
ir
,, ,..: .. .1.k...1/4„:...,*•• ::\' 1
,..,
_,!.4.-,..,-,4,i•-!.. •,.-,- — i•„.
., .
-_t-`
: --- • -I' -4
1111,141017' 111"'-diLl.t4 1.1..-11.;.°r- r‘Ir 1111°. i ',--
"i.: •4::::f;i\t'i.'''.1.4',.,,:-.,.',4-..').';`:.:-..„' ''''',44;z,.' '%e..71-,t,--7 . ' '-':'N''''H''t.'a-!' ,- •-'4,k0.,.=1"•erkir,"1- -.• ..i.1-,- -. .:2-__ - ' ''.*.'.

ON •- ., .4111111Pr
....,
• • .
1,.•.
.••-'-.2 .-•
-, , •- • .
- •. - ..

L •• •
.7°.;'.... 1.1111111.° -f. •'- ,-;;.:-.....t...4x'•g?V:.%.'4 A:.4'''r": ,..„,i-;-"!"‘ .?1.:
-
•er '.1,; Ail•,•‘, 'j..•••... ,..,„4, ......./E):,...i,,,,s ... •..„,.. . ,
/
. .,, ,....... ,_r •
' e, i-'4 . •-:N.:,•*„..,,,,,t-.7*....„..: :;.;.t-,i., .Ai.:!c-t• '. '',. -r• - •
• - I , i
• . . ,
""-.1.' ..•.:•-r11 '.`1 '4; 7V .k: t, ''#. -• •4''4", -fr -, N .:tivfsx,11.1,..„40 ., . , .,,,:. . t-,..,;., ,kr-..?,•: .,•-i .z..,,, • • / li:verr. -- %ow , , ,,-,"'.:. '...'4.-4,i, ' vdt'A)4-., .4:Lkizz,rN,••••.L..• .,...q.::'1 1 .- =
/ /r-17. , . -: , 1 . - . , •
,
. .L., „.,.., Tilk.., . , Jr.5., t: ..:1". ,A..••••-•%.:4' ''' / _ 7//••. 071P5- .._..0.: • ;. ....,4 4.0....A,'1,•• I'lt,Se.:!..1,Y •:- .;Zt j;t4.,.:1 4 ":f•Z,sikii !,•:,3,-,.:',..

All •INitilr....--'er- .4'. -.1.,;..1 ; ''. V.-.•',-":14- •1' 'W.r .'°', -1,:izei.§.%.,. .', ..p44 ,„_
.N',...x!,,..i...:, , ' ,1k.-hi,L. t,'..,,,y.:...:,.-.:,,..' '4•::,•1.,, .....,,t,.._:„
,.--
':-... 2...i,i...1.:.,,. . ,'..,..,:., -,a, • „•:, :
.,... , . ,_ . •
... i •
_ • ,,,,,,, t-iriniI „... •..;t..1.4.-..z„ ...,, .•.....• .•,'to,A, ?or .-- •
-14,,.',‘.:.6 •44'',Nkr;; ,- ..-...-.,-..,' L'..',.;-:, -•kL,Ik. \‘', ''''‘ ..' _?-1 . `-t, •
• .---
, ' . -,.fm.',-,.., ''t, ..1,1, -.,,,,,:.;i . -,-,?,, :,-: . ...,..:
....,
--.-
. r ,
brt'.,..il' .;:.\'''''' 4%.:: ' .i.,,,IZI.:',..1''....1.-,...f;',.... ,:t '''.• irt . -, . - ''' -- ' "•-`4. ' t' , • -
...,
.,..
. ,
-••
. / ,
/ / .,4.,..,,,•,,,,,l,z,,,..7, :::::;:,..,?.,j4,,,,,,...:,,4,-„.,...., ,.., ,...:4:1,,,,.. ..,,..,L ,.,,,,,,,..„,,, , t.,,,..i.,!‘7.,,,.. ...,.:,,,,,. ...3:- s-A,,,,,,,.. -,0,k't I.\ 4 " .',• ,'• \..
. .

5..,:11.-.1.,i',':•, .. , ir. .4,k:" .........'L'i q:1--AL"':7/.11.i-'....0i.-''''''‘ ‘.'.?...1%.:-1;."I'lilt :',',..•"::;;::','4:'-•J:i.:;•i•-:' •1?-.-'-;.• i r -4:14'11. )v,(.. ,. I C.•,.
1 I .
';:i• - T 4r -:,,,,,,-,k '., ,: --.;-,,J';:,: ,,,, .'-:,:,',-*, ;•,tsT,-‘:-f-T-!:- L';,"-.\ i,...., :,..l:..s....ili;'%...A.,)P:.. .,:r:j.?...::3,..:i4;/., ,;-r.,',..• .2...,„ ,..,..%. \I...,,,:i...... ..:i..il.'Ll..% :4...t.:•• . . a.L.L?...'' ?'i.':;i•'C •
4I f .:1• .1, • L.
i.'. ''X L.t.'L\P' '%bl.I. ''' ''L ..... ..Lp.p•!; ' '''•;kl'ik? .,Ati•?,t9'!.••• .k' '.i... ', L.'.• . 1', PO /
I
P .N. Y..•;.• '•.••P'•ri,'P., . .LPLIP Li • : •Ci'•• ..“LI, r I.4 ,::\p. ! ..L LL•••••''''.A.(L9 L''''''.. 1 I p I f i'. e...;1.1;i'••I'PpN1?;.:'l L .''','';',•'• ,.'' i.,: . ' '',..:'': L ?::,\':L:'L LI'. .•.1.L...'P'••-''i.' t.'''• '. r
$ ; .,,i-04,: ., ,,.,.-\,.,::, ,,A-t-,..:N., ,, . A ,•. .,-,Ir. ,:.,,.,-.....,, ,,-. ,.:.,,,,,,,,,i,i.,..,2,•.1,,,.-:-:N..,, ,_:.,... ,, I,.:;.• I .,,, ,„0._,,,-..: 4T,,,-;,,, . .., ,. . , , ,,,-- 1;4-,,,. :,,,: .::,,, , ,,.. , • ., . -1,,,, • r% :'Y.\ ... ',V-.....,--Z.,.:."Mb .', '! ,..,_••45..21!YE.?.,',`:-•::-,•'' .:-L... '• .. •,,. :.„„•.,:,,,•- Q,,.. A•,•i'l, :,..'-.'• . .,,WIL i.,• C. '',. ,,,, ' '..,..1,• .....r.••••7'.•,'.••,..';•:',,V?,-,',..',•-• ''''.. '''-.-•'L•' r•'.A...I .j.r .,,! .,•.:7,.:,. or. :,..r.f.,:. ....',. /r ) ,;:'. • -. .1i5'.4:.,_.••!,.4,11._ • • ;#
Ilf / .
-v, • , • •--`. \ . .,..•, ; : ,' .. --• ' ' ',•._. ::'...,.•:'-i,....-4,, ..., .• ., ,„ ,, „ . h ....1.
• .... ,• '. ''-.,-L,,••,, ... ' ..'. Y•?-",.. .•' ' , ''.'••
''''•' .... '0:::1..: ..L . i.\.4:\•..'n;:L,IL
-1- -f •
4 - , . :.f=• ...
4 ..•....-: ,' ' ° . ' -.•-.", 'L... \ .,. .....,._ , ,._ , . ,;.;,;•;:'-oLW / •
.--1''. A..V'-''k;
ik..e., ,. .
.
. . tt
• '-1..',0.:..-, it ':- . ' ,\‘;'N'"2.....i:t-;1;'. ':'' '.' .• ).:.,.▪ .. •i 7-.- ri:..i l'':
..:':/.'.;:...4.,:',:`:'...1;....,,,..
1 ' / ..' , •I' •i L P...i 1 1•',' ''' ••••. •. ' . PI; 3,.".' i, ,,
,, . 1• .
4r„ ,=-...--.••
: e
•
\ , _ / i -...'.1•,,... 4., '... --, . • -/. ,, 'o .-1 / i•ii •i''. ' -1! ' H
......--''' I
f-1 /; .
.. vej: • si
r.
t. .; 4 q-
1, • , -- - ••• '
•,' • .
. ,
_,,-.......; .. i J
i
111111 ' ' ' • .. / ( ' I. '
.
' . .
-. • 'r•
I .r .
......'" / . s ., . „
.• —, , .
1 ,..
. ,
, --

. l
/. _
Appendix
r_
TheAppendix contains descriptions of primaryguidance and applicable legislation, complete results of community engagement efforts, and planning-level cost estimates and conceptual drawings for the Plan's priority projects. . r.
r
T"'� L
7 kes,
tt4110 -' _ sz
400",:emie -
i
i.

SIIP/
I . .
. allw _ ,
s.
//A
1111 _ IIIP A--,-.--,f1.4,-- ,7€:2;;"
NC--,•-zvA-,::7_,,,... -
---0-,-..c.:_,-,... •
4 � ,. S. _
1,"1 NIIII0 -..,....s, _.-4-,...., --,-i---•„:11,-;-_---•::
i• i ati ..\ _42.- ..r,....A
4 14
, .., ,,. ‘41444,,,,,,,:-_. ,....•,,,,...,.,___.,., ..-`ram "+��-^ L
, ii,. i ,.
k lei
•.. ' E:
.111 4%11;1\64. _
• r
z
00,
\ \\V-34.,. Allibilikla._ . . ..

A. PRIMARY GUIDANCE AND APPLICABLE LEGISLATION
Primary Guidance
California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
In 2014,the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) updated the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) to provide uniform standards and specifi- cations for all official traffic control devices in California. Since 2014, the CA MUTCD has been updated eight times, most recently in January 2024. Caltrans is expected to release a revised CA MUTCD by January 2026 to conform with the new National MUTCD published by the FHWA in December 2023.

The purpose of the CA MUTCD is to improve safety and mobility for all travelers by setting min- imum standards and providing guidance intended to balance safety and mobility options for everyone in traffic, including drivers, pedestrians, and bicyclists. The CA MUTCD contains the basic principles that govern the design and use of traffic control devices to promote highway safety and efficiency through the orderly movement of all road users on streets, highways, bikeways,and private roads open to public travel. Multimodal policies for safer crossings,work zones, and intersections are integrated into the CA MUTCD, with improvements including:
► Crosswalks Enhancements Policy
► Temporary Traffic Control Plans
► Traffic Control for School Areas
Additionally, NACTO guidance was analyzed to ensure flexibility and innovation in the design and operations of streets and highways in California. Much of the guidance provided in the CA MUTCD is consistent with the NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide.

Additional Guidance
AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities (2024) &Guide for the Planning, Design,and Operation of Pedestrian Facilities (2021) The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) bicycle and pedestrian design guides are important national resources for planning, designing, and operating bicycle and pedestrian facilities. The NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide and the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Designing Urban Walkable Thoroughfares Guide build upon the flexibilities provided in the AASHTO guides, which can help communities plan and design safe and convenient facilities for pedestrians and cyclists. u.

FHWA supports the use of these resources to further develop non-motorized transportation a networks, particularly in urban areas. Moreover, in August of 2013,the FHWA issued a memo on Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility Design Flexibility issuing their support for taking a flexible ap- L proach to bicycle and pedestrian facility design. Moving away from standards and towards flexibility in design using the designer's judgment is an important step towards contextual design, implementing the appropriate facility based on location and context.

California Active Transportation Program
The California Active Transportation Program, created in 2013, consolidates existing federal o and state transportation programs, including the Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP), Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA), and State Safe Routes to School (SRTS), into a single program with a focus to make California a national leader in active transportation. SB-1 stipu- 0 lates that $100 million of revenues from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account will be available annually to the program.An additional $122.5 million in State and Federal funding is allocated to the program each year.
228 Page 573 of 707

Program funding is distributed as follows: 50 percent to the State for a statewide competi- tive program; 40 percent to Metropolitan Planning Organizations in urban areas with popu- lations greater than 200,000; and 10 percent to small urban and rural regions with popula- tions of 200,000 or less. Additionally, State-designated Disadvantaged Communities (DACs) are guaranteed a minimum of 25 percent of the entire program's funding. Eligible projects include infrastructure projects (capital improvement projects), non-infrastructure projects (education, encouragement, and enforcement activities, combination projects (infrastruc- ture and non-infrastructure), and communitywide planning projects in DACs.

California Transportation Plan 2050 (2021)
The California Transportation Plan 2050 (CTP) is a long-range plan completed in 2021 to pro- vide a common framework for transportation decisions and investments throughout the state.

It aims to meet the growing needs of California residents as it relates to travel accessibility, emissions, and economic impacts.

Caltrans' Deputy Directive 64-R2 (2014)
Deputy Directive 64-R2 is a policy statement affecting Caltrans mobility planning and proj- ects requiring the agency to:
"...provide for the needs of travelers of all ages and abilities in all planning, programming, de- sign,construction,operations,and maintenance activities and products on the State highway system. Caltrans views all transportation improvements as opportunities to improve safety, access. and mobility for all travelers in California and recognizes bicycle, pedestrian, and transit modes as integral elements of the transportation system." The directive goes on to mention the environmental, health, and economic benefits of more Complete Streets.

Caltrans Design Information Bulletin 89-02 (Updated in 2022) The Caltrans Design Information Bulletin (DIB) 89-02 is to provides design criteria and guid- ance on best practices related to separated bikeways to establish uniform guidance that will facilitate consistent user expectations. DIB 89-02 allows designers to exercise sound judg- ment when applying it while being consistent with the Caltrans Highway Design Manual and the CA MUTCD. DIB 89-02 is written to allow for flexibility in applying design criteria, taking into consideration the context of the project's location,enabling designers to tailor the design and maximize safety and comfort.

Best practices from cities, states, and countries currently operating separated bikeways were used to formulate DIB 89-02. This DIB will be updated as necessary based on lessons learned from engineers and practitioners as they gain more experience with the use of separated bikeways. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) publication Separated Bike Lane Plan- ning and Design Guide (FHWA Guide) should be used to design separated bikeways. Where DIB 89-02 is inconsistent with the FHWA Guide, DIB 89-02 should govern.

Caltrans Design Information Bulletin 94 (2024)
The Caltrans DIB-94 provides guidance for the scoping and design of Complete Streets proj- ects on the State Highway System. DIB-94 identifies best practice and establishes standards for development of Complete Streets facilities to support the design of comfortable and con- venient streetscapes by utilizing space-efficient forms of mobility such as people walking, biking, rolling, or accessing transit.

D
C
a)
a
a

CEQA for Bicycle and Pedestrian Plans
Based on Public Resources Code Section 15262 (Feasibility and Planning Studies) guidance, planning documents such as this ATP are exempt from CEQA analysis since they are planning and conceptual recommendations:
"A project involving only feasibility or planning studies for possible future actions which the agency, board, or commission has not approved, adopted, or funded does not require the preparation of an EIR or Negative Declaration but does require consideration of environmen- tal factors."
As individual recommendations move forward toward further design and implementation, the City will then need to determine if there are environmental impacts that may warrant an EIR. However, SB-288 exempts bicycle and pedestrian projects from CEQA requirements.

Caltrans Highway Design Manual,Chapter 1000: Bicycle Transportation Design Chapter 1000 of the Caltrans Highway Design Manual serves as the official design standard for bikeways in California. This chapter defines a "bikeway" as a facility that is provided pri- marily for bicycle travel and recognizes its importance in improving bicycling safety and con- venience. Chapter 1000 intends to help accommodate motor vehicle and bicycle traffic on the roadway system, or as a complement to the road system to meet the needs of bicyclists.

This chapter classifies bikeway facilities into five different types that include:
► Shared Roadway (No Bikeway Designation)
► Class I Bikeway (Bike Path)
► Class II Bikeway (Bike Lane)
► Class Ill Bikeway (Bike Route)
► Class IV Bikeways (Separated Bikeways)
However, Chapter 1000 states that these designations should not be construed as a hierarchy of bikeways since each bikeway type has its appropriate application. Additionally, Chapter 1000 only provides design guidance for Class I bike paths, Class Ill bike routes, and trails.

FHWA Separated Bike Lane Planning and Design Guide (2015) The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Separated Bike Lane Planning and Design Guide (2015) is the most recent national bike lane design guide and for many, the primary national resource for planning and designing bicycle facilities. It captures the state of practice of bicy- cle facility design within the street right of way. It provides a menu of design options covering atypical one and two-way cycle tracks and provides detailed intersection design information covering topics such as turning movement operations, signalization, signage, and on-road Zit markings.

L FHWA Bikeway Selection Guide (2019)
0 The FHWA Bikeway Selection Guide (2019) is an important complement to the FHWA Separat- ed Bike Lane Planning and Design Guide. It has a focus on designing for all ages and abilities.

It gives the designer additional tools such as matrices, flow charts, and graphs that facilitate 2 the design of the appropriate bikeway based both on roadway characteristics and the in- tended type of bicyclist.
0 NACTO Transit Street Design Guide (2016)
As transit gains a more prominent role in cities, more people are using buses, streetcars, and 0 light rail than ever before. As a result, street design is shifting to give transit the space it de- serves. The National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) Transit Street Design Guide (2016) provides design guidance for the development of transit facilities on streets, as 230 well as for prioritizing transit, improving its service quality, and supporting other relpiA9g1 J.707

The majority of design elements included in this guide are consistent with MUTCD standards, including signage, markings, and signal elements that have received interim approval. These guidelines were developed using other design guidance as a basis, along with city case stud- ies, best practices, research and evaluation of existing designs, and professional consensus.

NACTO Urban Bikeway&Street Design Guides
The NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide (2012) and Urban Street Design Guide (2013) repre- sent the industry standard for innovative bicycle and streetscape facilities and treatments in the United States. In 2014, Caltrans officially endorsed the NACTO Urban Street Design Guide and Urban Bikeway Design Guide as valuable toolkits for designing and constructing safe, attractive local streets. At the time, Caltrans was only the third State Department of Transpor- tation to officially endorse the guides. It is also important to note that virtually all of the Urban Bikeway Design Guide design treatments (with two exceptions) are permitted under the Fed- eral MUTCD.

NACTO Urban Street Stormwater Guide (2017)
The NACTO Urban Street Stormwater Guide (2017) provides guidelines on how to create streets that are resilient to climate impacts and also provide quality public spaces with social and economic benefits. This guide focuses on green infrastructure within urban streets, including the design and engineering of stormwater management practices that support and improve mobility. It also intends to reduce the impacts of stormwater runoff and human activity on natural ecological processes.

One of the main goals of this guide is to encourage interdepartmental partnerships around sustainable infrastructure,which includes communicating the benefits of such projects. How- ever, this guide does not address stormwater management strategies on private property, nor does it address drainage and infiltration around controlled-access highways.

Applicable Legislation
Several pieces of legislation support increased bicycling and walking in the State of California.

Much of the legislation addresses greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction and employs bicycling and walking as a means to achieve reduction targets. Other legislation highlights the intrin- sic worth of bicycling and walking and treats the safe and convenient accommodation of bicyclists and walkers as a matter of equity. The most relevant legislation concerning bicycle and pedestrian policy, planning, infrastructure, and programs are described in the following sections.

Federal Legislation
Interim Approval for Optional Use of an Intersection Bicycle Box (IA-18) Intersection bicycle boxes are designated areas at signalized intersections that provide bi- cyclists with a space in which to wait in front of stopped motor vehicles during the red signal phase so that they are more visible to motorists. Since they are still considered experimen- tal traffic control devices, the FHWA issued an Interim Approval to allow the provisional use of intersection bicycle boxes in October 2016. This Interim Approval does not create a new mandate compelling the use of intersection bicycle boxes but will allow agencies to install intersection bicycle boxes, pending official rulemaking revising the MUTCD, to facilitate more efficient operations at intersections. Interim Approval of a provisional device typically results in its inclusion in a future Notice of Proposed Amendments to revise the MUTCD. However, this x Interim Approval does not guarantee the adoption of the provisional device, either in whole or .773 in part, in any future rulemaking that revises the MUTCD. Q Q

Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (2021)
In November 2021, Congress passed a new transportation bill, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021, also known as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. The law targets a wide variety of infrastructure investments aimed at reducing GHG emissions from the nation's transportation network and increasing the resilience of transportation infrastructure to ex- treme weather and climate impacts. Among other things, the law allocates $1.4 billion for the Transportation Alternatives Program in FY 2022, which will support pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure, recreational trails, safe routes to school, and more. Additionally, the law pro- vides $1 billion in FY 2022 for the new Safe Streets and Roads for All program,which will provide funding directly to local and tribal governments to make streets safer with a particular focus on those walking, biking, and rolling.

State Legislation and Policies
AB-32 California Global Warming Solutions Act (2006)
AB-32 requires California to reduce its GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.AB-32 also directs the California Air Resources Board (GARB) to develop specific early actions to reduce green- house gases while also preparing a scoping plan to identify how best to reach the 2020 limit.

AB-43 Traffic Safety (2021)
AB-43 allows local jurisdictions to lower speed limits to make streets safer for people who walk and ride a bicycle. In particular, AB-43 gives local authorities more options for reducing speeding along high-injury streets and commercial districts.

AB-285 California Transportation Plan (2019)
AB-285 requires the California Transportation Plan (CTP), produced by Caltrans, to address how it will help meet state GHG emission and clean air goals. Starting in 2025,the CTP will have to forecast the potential impacts of future transportation technologies on infrastructure, ac- cess, and the overall transportation system. It will also be required to consider environmental justice in its planning for transportation and freight movement.

AB-361 Vehicles: Photographs of Bicycle Lane Parking Violations (2023) AB-361 allows local jurisdictions to install forward-facing parking control devices on city- owned parking enforcement vehicles and take photographs of parking violations in bicycle lanes. AB-361 enables local jurisdictions to review parking violations and issue citations to the u.
registered owner of a vehicle within 15 calendar days.
z AB-390 Pedestrian Crossing Signals (2017)
T.

AB-390 authorizes a pedestrian facing a flashing "DON'T WALK" or "WAIT" or approved "Up- raised hand" symbol with a "countdown" signal to proceed, so long as the pedestrian com- a) pletes the crossing before the display of the steady "DON'T WALK OR WALK" or "WAIT" or ap- proved "Upraised Hand" symbol.
2 AB-413 Vehicles: stopping, standing, and parking (2023) 0 AB-413, also known as the Daylighting to Save Lives Bill, changes the California Vehicle Code to prohibit the stopping, standing, or parking of a vehicle within 20 feet of the vehicle approach 0 side of any unmarked or marked crosswalk or 15 feet of any crosswalk where a curb extension is present. AB-413 will improve visibility for vehicles approaching crosswalks by giving them 232 Page 577 of 707

more time to see and yield to a person approaching an intersection. Prior to January 1, 2025, AB-413 jurisdictions may only issue a warning for a violation unless the violation occurs in an area marked using paint or a sign.

AB-712 Tenancy. personal micromobility devices (2023)
AB-712 prohibits landlords from prohibiting a tenant from owning personal micromobility de- vices or from storing and recharging up to one personal micromobility device in their dwelling unit for each person occupying the unit.

AB-773 Street Closures and Designations (2021)
AB-773 authorizes local authorities to adopt a rule or regulation to implement a slow streets program,which may include closures to vehicular traffic or through vehicular traffic of neigh- borhood local streets with connections to citywide bicycle networks, destinations that are within walking distance, or green space.

AB-902 Traffic Violations and Diversion Programs (2015) AB-902 allows any person of any age who commits an infraction not involving a motor vehicle to participate in a diversion program sanctioned by local law enforcement.The bill eliminates the requirement that such a program charge no fee, as well as other technical changes.

Prior law provided that a local authority may not allow a person who has committed a traffic violation under the Vehicle Code to participate in a driver awareness or education program as an alternative to the imposition of those penalties and procedures unless the program is a diversion program for a minor who commits an infraction not involving a motor vehicle and for which no fee is charged.

AB-1096 Electric Bicycles as Vehicles (2015)
AB-1096 defines an "electric bicycle" as a bicycle with fully operable pedals and an electric motor of fewer than 750 watts and creates three classes of electric bicycles.AB-1096 prohibits the operation of the most powerful Class 3 electric bicycles on specified paths, lanes, or trails unless that operation is authorized by a local ordinance. AB-1096 also authorizes a local au- thority or governing body to prohibit, by ordinance, the operation of Class 1 or Class 2 electric bicycles on specified paths or trails. Prior law defined a "motorized bicycle" as a device that has fully operative pedals for propulsion by human power and has an electric motor that meets specified requirements.

AB-1193 Bikeways (2014)
AB-1193 amends various code sections, all relating to bikeways in general, specifically by rec- ognizing a fourth class of bicycle facility,cycle tracks. However,another component of AB-1193 may be even more significant to future bikeway development. Prior law required Caltrans, in cooperation with county and city governments, to establish minimum safety design criteria for the planning and construction of bikeways, and requires the department to establish uni- form specifications and symbols regarding bicycle travel and traffic-related matters. Prior law also required all city, county, regional, and other local agencies responsible for the devel- opment or operation of bikeways or roadways to utilize all of those minimum safety design criteria and uniform specifications and symbols.

D
AB-1193 revises these provisions to require Caltrans to establish minimum safety design cri- teria for each type of bikeway and also authorizes local agencies to utilize different minimum Q safety criteria if adopted by resolution at a public meeting.

AB-1266 Bicycle Guidance Signs Through an Intersection (2019) AB-1266 aims to make it safer for bicycle riding in California at busy intersections. The bill re- quires Caltrans to develop standards for lane striping, pavement markings, and appropriate regulatory signs that allow bicyclists to go straight from a right or left turn lane and to safely cross outside of the high-traffic lanes.

AB-1358 Complete Streets Act (2008)
AB-1358 requires the legislative body of a city or county, upon revision of the Circulation Ele- ment of their General Plan, to identify how the jurisdiction will provide for the routine accom- modation of all users of the roadway including drivers, pedestrians, cyclists, individuals with disabilities, seniors, and public transit users. The bill also directs the California Governor's Of- fice of Planning and Research (OPR) to amend guidelines for General Plan Circulation Element development so that the building and operation of local transportation facilities safely and conveniently accommodate everyone, regardless of their travel mode.

AB-1371 Passing Distance/Three Feet for Safety Act (2013) AB-1371, widely referred to as the "Three Foot Passing Law," requires drivers to provide at least three feet of clearance when passing bicyclists. If traffic or roadway conditions prevent drivers from giving bicyclists three feet of clearance, they must "slow to a speed that is reasonable and prudent"and wait until they reach a point where passing can occur without endangering the bicyclists. Violations are punishable by a $35 base fine, but drivers who collide with bicy- clists and injure them in violation of the law are subject to a $220 fine.

AB-1774 E-Bike Modification (2024)
AB-1774 prohibits the sale of electric bicycle modification devices that enable the electric mo- tor to exceed 750 watts. This effectively ensures that electric bicyclists are complying with the maximum electric bicycle speed limit of twenty-eight miles per hour under Class 3,the fastest classification of electric bicycles.

AB-1778 E-Bike Pilot Age Restrictions (2024)
AB-1778 regulates the use of Class 2 electric bicycles by setting the minimum age to operate a Class 2 electric bicycle to sixteen and requiring all Class 2 electric bicycle riders to wear a helmet. Riders under sixteen years of age are still legally allowed to ride Class I electric bicy- cles.
u.

AB-1909 Vehicles: Bicycle Omnibus Bill (2022)
z AB-1909 included four changes to the California Vehicle Code aimed at improving the rights L of bicyclists to safely access public bikeways and streets. AB-1909 (1) requires vehicles to 0 change lanes when passing someone on a bike if a lane is available; (2) allows Class 3 elec- tric bicycles on a bicycle path or trail, bikeway, bicycle lane, equestrian trail, or hiking or rec- 6 reational trail unless specifically prohibited by a local jurisdiction; (3) allows bicyclists to cross an intersection during a pedestrian walk signal; and (4) prohibits a jurisdiction from requiring bicycles operated within its jurisdiction to be licensed.Together,these four changes will make it easier and safer to ride a bicycle in California.
0 0
Q
234 Page 579 of 707

AB-2086 Transportation Accountability Act (2024)
AB-2086 brings transparency to Caltrans spending by requiring the California Transportation Plan to contain a financial element that summarizes the full cost of plan implementation. To further increase transparency and accountability, information on how annual project invest- ments advance the California Transportation Plan must be added to the existing public online dashboard on or before January 1, 2027.

AB-2147 Pedestrians (2022)
AB-2147 prohibits a police officer from stopping a pedestrian for specified traffic infractions, such as jaywalking, unless the street crossing is truly dangerous. AB-2147 legalizes safe street crossings and eliminates an arbitrary traffic enforcement practice that disproportionately targeted people of color.

AB-2669 Banning Bridge Tolls for People Walking and Biking (2024) AB-2669 allows pedestrians, bicyclists, or people using personal micromobility devices to cross existing toll bridges in California without paying a fee.

AB-2863 Green Building Standards: Bicycle Parking (2022) AB-2863 requires the Department of Housing and Community Development, upon the next triennial update of the California Green Building Standards Code that occurs on or after Jan- uary 1, 2023,to research and develop mandatory building standards for short-term and long- term bicycle parking in multifamily residential buildings, hotels, and motels.

SB-1 Transportation Funding (2017)
SB-1 creates the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program to address deferred main- tenance on the state highway system and the local street and road system. A total of $5.4 billion will be invested annually over the next decade, which will address a backlog of repairs and upgrades. Additionally, cleaner and more sustainable travel networks will be ensured for the future, including upgrades to local roads, and transit agencies, and an expansion of the state's growing network of pedestrians and bicycle routes.

SB-288 California Environmental Quality Act Exemptions: Transportation-related Projects (2020)
SB-288 expands and extends exemptions from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) environmental review requirements for transportation-related projects. Transporta- tion-related projects exempt from CEQA requirements include, but are not limited to, pedes- trian and bicycle facilities projects, charging infrastructure for zero-emission buses, and new rapid transit, bus, or light rail service.

SB-375 Redesigning Communities to Reduce Greenhouse Gases (2008) SB-375 seeks to reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) through land use and planning incen- tives. Key provisions require the larger regional transportation planning agencies to develop more sophisticated transportation planning models and to use them to create "preferred growth scenarios" in their regional plans that reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The bill also provides incentives for local governments to incorporate these preferred growth scenarios into the transportation elements of their general land use plans. a
Q

SB-400 Clean Cars 4 All Program (2019)
SB-400 expands the eligible modes of transportation for which the Clean Cars 4 All (CC4A) program "mobility option" may include bike sharing and electric bikes. CC4A aims to reduce car emissions by increasing the turnover of existing vehicles and replacing them with newer, cleaner, and more efficient vehicles. Reducing emissions from existing vehicles is a compo- nent of California's State Implementation Plan for meeting air quality standards and also sup- ports efforts to meet the state's 2030 climate change goals.

SB-672 Traffic-Actuated Signals: Motorcycles and Bicycles (2017) SB-672 indefinitely extends the requirement to install traffic-actuated signals to detect lawful bicycle or motorcycle traffic on the roadway. By indefinitely extending requirements regard- ing traffic-actuated signals applicable to local governments, SB-672 imposes a state-man- dated local program. Existing law requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state.

SB-743 CEQA Reform (2013)
SB-743 changed the method of traffic analysis required through the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for publicly and privately initiated projects. Before SB-743, transportation impacts were analyzed by quantifying traffic congestion as measured by the level of service (LOS), which resulted in mitigation measures to reduce traffic, such as building new roads or travel lanes, widening existing roads, adding turn lanes, and installing traffic control devices.

Now, under SB-743, transportation impacts are assessed by quantifying how much and how far people drive, using a measure called Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). By measuring transpor- tation impacts by VMT, mitigation measures can include opportunities to improve non-vehic- ular travel options, such as installing bicycle and pedestrian facilities, improving public transit access, and more.

SB-689 Bike Lanes in Coastal Areas (2024)
When local governments want to add dedicated transit lanes, pedestrian walkways, or bi- cycle lanes to coastal areas, Local Coastal Programs are required documents that must be approved by the California Coastal Commission. SB-689 limits the ability of the Coastal Com- mission to block the development of new bikeways on existing roads in coastal areas by mak- ing it easier to amend Local Coastal Programs.

SB-922 California Environmental Quality Act Exemption: Transportation-related Projects u.
(2022)
SB-922 extends until 2030 statutory exemptions to the California Environmental Quality Act for sustainable transportation projects, including improvements for walking, biking, public transit efficiency and wayfinding; rail stations; zero-emission transit refueling facilities; and carpool- ing.
aw
SB-932 General Plans: Circulation Element Bicycle and Pedestrian Plans and Traffic Calm- 2 ing Plans (2022)
SB-932 requires cities and counties, upon any substantive revision of a general plan circula- o tion element, to develop bicycle plans, pedestrian plans, and traffic calming plans based on the policies and goals in the circulation element. SB-932 also requires cities and counties to 0 begin implementation of a plan within two years of adoption; regularly review implementa- Q tion progress; and consider revising the circulation element if the goals of the bicycle, pedes- trian, or traffic calming plans will not be met within 25 years of circulation element adoption. 236 Page 581 of 707

SB-960 Complete Streets Bill (2024)
SB-960 requires Caltrans to set targets for active transportation and public transit improve- ments in State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP) projects, such as building bikeways, sidewalks, bus boarding islands, and more. SB-960 mandates that Caltrans con- sider the needs of people walking, biking, and taking transit when repairing state roadways.

SB-1000 Planning for Healthy Communities Act (2016)
Under SB 1000, cities and counties are required to adopt an Environmental Justice Element or integrate environmental just-related policies, objectives, and goals throughout other el- ements of their General Plan. The bill also includes a process for communities to become meaningfully involved in the decision-making processes that govern land use planning in their neighborhoods.

SB-1216 Limits on Class Ill Bikeways (2024)
SB-1216 prohibits the creation of Class III Bikeways on roads with a posted speed limit greater than thirty miles per hour, except at or near an intersection for the purpose of connecting a Class I, Class II, or Class IV bikeway through the intersection. This new law will also limit the use of State funding to create Class III bikeways on high-speed corridors.

SB-1271 E-Bike Battery Safety Standards (2024)
Beginning on January 1, 2026, SB-1271 requires all electric bicycles sold in California to have their batteries tested and certified for safety standards. SB-1271 also clarifies rules for the ad- vertisement and sale of electric bicycles.

Governor's Executive Order N-19-19 (2019)
California Governor Gavin Newsom signed Executive Order N-19-19 on September 20, 2019, to require the State to continue efforts to reduce GHG emissions and mitigate climate change impacts while building a sustainable economy. The California State Transportation Agency is directed to leverage strategies toward lowering vehicle miles traveled by supporting active modes of transportation such as biking and walking that also benefit public health. x
D
c
a)
a
Q

W Upland Mobility Master Plan FINAL DRAFT
co
—1
DYNAMIC RAILROAD g CO
ASHING SHARED SEPARATE PEDESTRIAN a • RAILROAD LIGHT CROSSBUCK PEDESTRIAN SEPARAT PEDESTRIAN SWING BARRIER OR ENVELOPE CROSSING CD CROSSING SIGNAL SIGN(Y N) ROADWAY PEDESTRI CROSSBUCK GATE HANNELIZAT • , PAVEMENT PAVEMENT Dxi (0N) ATE(YIN) GATE( SIGN(YIN) (Y/N MARKINGS MARKING 12. (YIN) (Y/N)
a r
Central Avenue
(North Bound) Y Y N N N N N Y Y Q Central Avenue a 0
(South Bound) Y Y N N N N N Y Y a 0 0 N
N.Benson Avenue Y Y N N N N N Y Y 5. 0 (North Bound) cQ xi
N.Benson Avenue Y Y N N N N N Y Y 0 (South Bound) m H
N.Mountain Avenue Y Y Y N N N N Y Y y (North Bound)
i
N.Mountain Avenue Y Y N N N N N Y Y 0_, 0 (South Bound)
N.San Antonio 7 Z/
Avenue Y Y N N N N N Y Y p (North Bound) cGD T
N.San Antonio N Z
Avenue(South Y Y N N N N N Y Y cn Bound) 0

Q XI
Euclid Avenue (/)
(North Bound) Y Y N Y N N N Y Y m Euclid Avenue Y Y N Y N N N Y Y Q (South Bound) a
D
S.2nd Avenue Y Y Y N N N N Y Y rt (North Bound) a)
m
S.2nd Avenue Y Y Y N N N N Y Y (South Bound)
N.Campus Avenue Y Y Y N N N N Y Y (North Bound)
U
corp N.Campus Avenue Y Y N N N N N Y Y CD (South Bound)
U1
Co Grove Avenue Y Y N N N N N Y Y 0 (North Bound)
p Grove Avenue Y Y N N N N N Y N v(South Bound)

-1

DETECTABLE
CONTRASTING CONCRETE a
-SIDEWALK DEST• AN PAVEMENT CROSSING OP URB WARNING m CROSSIN c- REFUGE AREA BAR RAMP SURFACE ON NOTES D (Y/N) COLOR OR PANEL (Y/N) (Y/N APPROACH TO I TEXTURE(VA! CROSSING (Y/N)
m
0 Central Avenue Y* N Y Y N N* N *The crossbuck sign is blocking (North Bound) wheelchair access to sidewalk 0 0 Central Avenue a
Y* N Y Y N N* N *No curb ramp but is sloped (South Bound) 0
O
N.Benson Avenue *No curb,but the crossbuck sign y (North Bound) Y N N Y N N* N is blocking wheelchair access to 5' sidewalk CO
5 N.Benson Avenue Y N N Y N N* N *There are cement blockers(both < (South Bound) sides) D
O
N.Mountain Avenue Y N Y Y N N* N *The crossbuck sign is blocking '< (North Bound) wheelchair access to sidewalk CD
N.Mountain Avenue Y N Y Y N N* N *There are cement blockers(both m (South Bound) sides) C"
N.San Antonio Avenue Y N Y Y N N* N *No curb ramp but is sloped (North Bound) 0
D
N.San Antonio Avenue Y N Y Y N N* N *There are cement blockers(both D (South Bound) sides) p
D
Euclid Avenue
(North Bound) Y N Y Y N N* N *No curb ramp but is sloped Q n
Euclid Avenue Y N Y Y N N* N cD (South Bound) y
S.2nd Avenue Y N N Y N N* N *No curb ramp but is sloped (North Bound)
S.2nd Avenue *On the SE side the sidewalk ends (South Bound) Y* N N Y N N* N shortly after the tracks N.Campus Avenue Y N Y Y N N* N *No curb but is sloped (North Bound)
N.Campus Avenue Y N Y Y N N* N
-(South Bound)
v
mGrove Avenue Y N Y Y N N* N *No curb but is sloped Ui(North Bound)
Co
Grove Avenue
Y N Y Y N N* N *Some fencing
O(South Bound)
O
v
IV
w Appendix
Co

C. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT RESULTS
The community engagement results provided in Appendix C include public comments from community members as written. Public comments are provided for reference and do not rep- resent the views of the City.

Pop-Up Events
Pop-Up#1: Earth Day Celebration
Date: April 20, 2024
Location: Greenbelt Park
Table A-3: Citywide Map Activity Comments
• • • ` COMMENTS CATEGORY
llth Street Sidewalks! Crosswalks out of 11th/Monte Vista. Cannot Pedestrian Concern walk to 11th and Arrow Center
14th Street Way Missing curb ramps on north side 14th Street at Ukiah Missing Curb Ramp 15th Street 15th to Fairwood to Coronado,cross Coronado,down ADA Concern Wedgewood - uneven sidewalk
16th Street Sidewalk uneven 16th & Mountain area ADA Concern 16th Street Sidewalks [between 16th and 24th] are lifted - unsafe Pedestrian Concern for walkers and bike riders
19th Street Uneven sidewalks, no ADA,oak trees ADA Concern 2nd Avenue Need sidewalk infill on 2nd Avenue from 8th Street to A Missing Sidewalk Street
Enjoy walking dog several times a week around 6th
between Euclid and Mountain, but that area has
6th Street construction and no clear path for pedestrians - feels Pedestrian Concern unsafe. No crosswalk during construction. Need a clear
path for pedestrians.

Arrow Highway Bike parking near Upland Elementary School Bicyclist Concern EBaseline Road sahoolWest trail along Baseline Road to connect Pedestrian Concern u.a
Better crosswalk with flashing RRFBs at Campus
Campus Avenue Avenue and Mesa Court Pedestrian Concern Zit
Z
,� Citywide More bike lanes throughout - especially along Foothill! Bicyclist Concern c
0 Infrastructure is important. Put our powerlines under Citywide ground instead of above.We don't need to be Other vulnerable to losing power.
0 2 Not all cyclists stop at stop signs - road bikes in Citywide particular. Bicyclist Concern
Downtown Upland Create complete streets in and leading to Downtown Pedestrian Concern Upland
D
a Downtown Upland Need flashing stoplights around schools downtown Pedestrian Concern Q
Euclid Trail Extend Euclid path south of Foothill Trail Access 240 Page 585 of 707

LOCATION OMMENTS CATEGORIA
Better access to Euclid Trail with pedestrian activated Euclid Trail crossings near Pioneer High School Trail Access Foothill Boulevard More bike lanes throughout - especially along Foothill! Bicyclist Concern Foothill Boulevard Bike racks at bus stops on Foothill Bicyclist Concern Foothill Boulevard Potholes around High School on Foothill. Repaving Driving Concern needed.

Laurel Avenue Bad street surface Driving Concern Mountain - west side. North of 15th,south of 16th -
Mountain Avenue Tough for me to use wheelchair. Uneven sidewalk stops ADA Concern my wheelchair.

Bus line on Mountain near 15th/16th is not running
Mountain Avenue anymore (or as often). Keeps people from volunteering Bus Concern at shelter.

Pacific Electric Trail Need safe crossing for Pacific Electric Trail around Trail Access Benson
Pacific Electric Trail Add DG along Pacific Electric Trail (like neighboring Trail Access cities)
Upland Elementary Better street lighting near Upland Elementary Pedestrian Concern Upland High School Need clearly marked bike lanes around high school Bicyclist Concern Pop-Up#2: Upland Lemon Festival
Date: June 14 and 15, 2024
Location: Downtown Upland
Table A-4: Safe Mobility Solution Voting Activity Results • ' • • ` NUMBER OF VOTES
Improved Sidewalks 32
Enhanced Crossings 27
Curb Extension 23
Class IV Separated Bikeways 20
Class I Multi-use Paths 19
Curb Ramps 18
High-visibility Crosswalk 17
Colored Bicycle Striping 15
Signage&Lighting 15
Bus Shelters 12
Class II Bicycle Lanes 9
Class III Bicycle Routes 2 a)
Q
Total 209

Table A-5: Citywide Map Activity Comments
LOCATION COMMEN ' 11,11.1.1111r1
9th Street Fell on sidewalk at 9th Street and 1st Avenue and broke Pedestrian Concern front teeth.Very uneven.
13th Street 13th Street is a bad street for sidewalks. Pedestrian Concern 14th Street 14th Street is a bad street for sidewalks. Pedestrian Concern 15th Street Bad streelight placement.Too far from corner,can't Driving Concern see people walking.

Arrow Highway Bad sidewalks on Arrow and 12th. Pedestrian Concern Citywide Cars block driveways in private/residential driveways Other Citywide Lots of cities are making these improvements for Other pedestrians and bicyclists.Good to see this!
Citywide Thank you! Glad you guys are doing this. Other Citywide Less cul-de-sacs please! They feel more like mazes Other than actual living neighborhood.

Citywide More shade trees and native trees. Traffic Calming Downtown Upland Better parking downtown (especially during Lemon Festival). Driving Concern Downtown Upland Request bike corral/bike valet for Lemon Festival. Bicyclist Concern Foothill Boulevard Bad pavement (Foothill &Benson) Driving Concern Foothill Boulevard Uneven sidewalk at Foothill & Mountain. Pedestrian Concern Foothill Boulevard Fix Foothill from Central to Campus Driving Concern Foothill Boulevard Foothill!! Foothill!! Foothill!! Driving Concern Foothill Boulevard Fix roads by Upland High School on Foothill Driving Concern Foothill Boulevard Needs to be redone - rough (Euclid to Benson). East to Driving Concern Euclid is great
Foothill Boulevard Starbucks before Mountain,very rough streets, Driving Concern between Foothill & Pine
I-
exFoothill Boulevard Between Benson and Mountain,grafitti along walkway. Pedestrian Concern Foothill road condition up Mountain to Foothill. Asphalt a Foothill Boulevard is rough. Driving Concern Foothill Boulevard Buffer zone on Foothill with trees between houses to Other o help with fires.

Laurel Avenue & Emerson Street. Cannot go out on
Laurel Avenue sidewalk because I am in a wheelchair. I have called to ADA Concern 2 complain. 50 year resident of Upland.

Pacific Electric Trail Please don't block bike trail during Lemon Festival Bicyclist Concern 0 2 Maybe add bike station with tools on Pacific Electric Pacific Electric Trail Trail. Start at Upland: "Welcome to Upland Station". Bicyclist Concern 0 Know tools get stolen from bike stations.

Q -
242 Page 587 of 707

Pop-Up#3-5:Gibson Senior Center, Lemon Zest 5K, Upland Farmers Market Comments for pop-up booths #3, #4, and#5 were combined and listed below.

Pop-Up #3: March 7th, 2025 at Gibson Senior Center
Pop-Up #4: March 8th, 2025 at Lemon Zest 5K & 1K at Magnolia Park Pop-Up #5: March 8th, 2025 at Upland Farmers Market in Downtown Upland General Comments
Parking
► Parking is needed near downtown, but we don't want a multi-story garage. ► People park on sidewalks in residenKal areas. Specifically on Euclid, 7th and 8th. ► Repair speed bumps on Francis and near Sierra Vista Elementary School.

Sidewalks
► There are no sidewalks along 16th between Inglewood (?) and Campus on the North side and people run in bike lanes.
► Sidewalks raised from pine trees that cause interference with bikes/scooters.

Bicycle Facilities & Trails
► I love the ideas of bike paths. We currently have kids bike on the sidewalks since streets don't feel safe.
► Pacific Trail could use more beautification.
► Pacific Trail is great, but I would like more shading along this trail. ► Bike lanes around creeks would be appreciated.
► Safety is a concern within the trails where at times there are transients hanging out. ► There is regularly glass along Stewart and 2nd, between Euclid and the liquor store. Ninth St as well.
► Poorly placed ped button at Mountain Avenue. There are decorative boulders that prevent wheelchairs and bikes access to the bueon.
► We want more bike paths (for our family of four).
► I am grateful for bike trail stop light at Campus. I love the dog park.

Other
► Fix traffic signal timing on Campus and 14th.
► Not enough trash cans by the Gibson Senior Center and there are a lot of homeless on Eu- clid by the School District, where there is also a lot of trash unlike Clairemont. ► Potholes on streets are a concern (comment from about 5 people). x
D
c
a)
a
Q

Table A-6: Sticker Voting Results:What makes it hard for you to walk in Upland? NUMBER VOTES 1111M
Sidewalks are missing or in poor condition 37 Dangerous driving behavior 25
Not enough street lighting 24
Missing curb ramps for wheelchairs/mobility devices 21 Intersections are missing crosswalks 18 Safe crossings are too far apart 11
Intersections are too wide 6
I don't feel safe on overpasses or railroad crossings 3 Map Activity Comments: Mobility Issues and Opportunities Near the Gibson Senior Center (Pop-Up#3 only)
► 3rd and Arrow has the longest lastng light in the City-the issue on Arrow at 5pm is that one can't get across the street.
► QR codes should be added to downtown sidewalks like Claremont has, to direct to more city info.
► I wish Upland had beeer crosswalks and better crossing signals. ► There are potholes on Foothill Blvd.
► The bike lane at Arrow by the hospital is confusing to cyclists,as it goes downhill and is hard to see people crossing the street.
► Electric bikes on Pacific Trail are fast and quiet, which is startling. ► The parking lot stripes at the Senior Center need repainKng. ► Several comments of appreciation and that nothing related to mobility needs improving. u.
a
Zit
z
T.

C
0 C-
aw
4J
0 2
0 0
c
0 Q
244 Page 589 of 707

Community Open House
Date: August 27, 2024
Location: Carnegie Library
Attendance: 32 attendees
Vision Statement Comments: In the future, Upland's Mobility System will... ► Have safer areas for pedestrians and bicyclists to move. ► Integrate sustainable design (using native plants for tree canopies, bioswales, etc.) with behavioral design (increasing walkability and bikeability). ► Be inclusive to residents of all abilities.

Table A-7: Sticker Voting Results:What makes it hard for you to walk in Upland? U ' : ' OF VOTES
.111MEMIMIL_ v
Dangerous driving behavior 7
Sidewalks are missing or in poor condition 7
Missing curb ramps for wheelchairs/mobility devices 4 Not enough street lighting 4
Intersections are missing crosswalks 3
Intersections are too wide 0
Safe crossings are too far apart 0
I don't feel safe on overpasses or railroad crossings 0 Table A-8: Sticker Voting Results: What makes it hard for you to bike in Upland?

MBE'OTES
‘le
Dangerous driving behavior 13
Bike lanes aren't in a safe condition or kept clean 9 Not enough bike facilities 4
Lack of bike parking at my destination 4
Not enough street lighting 3
I don't feel safe on overpasses or railroad crossings 0 x
c
m
a
a

Table A-9: Sticker Voting Results: What makes it hard for you to ride the bus in Upland?

NUMBER OF VOTES
Bus stops do not feel safe 7
There isn't a bus stop close enough to my home 3 Bus stops are not ADA-accessible 2
Buses are often late 1
Bike racks on buses are often full 1
Buses don't run early or late enough in the day 0 Table A-10: Citywide Map Activity&General Comments
LOCATION COMMENTS CATEGORY
Need bicycle boulevard along llth Bicyclist Concern llth Street
Better (but not polluting) pedestrian lighting along llth Pedestrian Concern 16th Street Protected bike lane! Bicyclist Concern 2nd Avenue and Flashing stop signs Traffic Calming Needed
llth Street
Flashing 4-way stop signs. Pedestrian Concern
8th Street Safe crosswalk needed near Olivedale Park Pedestrian Concern Needs sidewalk, better pedestrian lighting, and better Pedestrian Concern bike lane along Arrow Highway
Arrow Highway
Bioswales, permeable pavers, urban tree canopy along Other Arrow Highway
Restrict speed limit on Campus Avenue Traffic Calming Needed
Campus Avenue - f
More street lighting along Campus Avenue (Foothill Pedestrian Concern down to 10 Fwy)
Campus Avenue/ Campus &Washington - suggestion flashing light for Traffic Calming Washington Street cars to stop for pedestrians and bicyclists. Needed 1-
u.
< Colonies Shopping Not enough bike racks at the Colonies to shop or eat Bicyclist Concern G Center No bike racks at The Colonies, if we want to eat or shop. Bicyclist Concern a
Z Cucamonga Creek Can't easily access lane from Cucamonga Creek Trail. c Trail Trail is blocked by a cable. Bicyclist Concern 0 Y_ Improve sidewalks Pedestrian Concern a) Downtown Upland
(-7) Not enough bike racks while we eat at restaurants Bicyclist Concern 0 2
7a
0 2
D
C
0 Q
D
246 Page 591 of 707

LOCATION OMMENTS CATEGORY
Euclid Trail should light up on the ground when a
person is about to cross the street with solar lights. Pedestrian Concern Maybe a sensor light could be added at the pole.

Euclid Trail needs a water station. I would like to see the ground of the crosswalk to have solar light on the Pedestrian Concern ground and more light on poles and a sensor light for
people.

There needs to be better light for bike riders on Euclid. Bicyclist Concern I would like more solar stop signs on Euclid. Euclid and 16th Street intersection needs to be reengineered. It Pedestrian Concern Euclid Trail looks unsafe. I avoid the area.

There should be a blue light phone for emergencies
on the Euclid Trail, like colleges do for safety. People do Pedestrian Concern walk at night.

The roads between the marked streets on Euclid Trail
need more markings. They are kind of hidden. I like the Pedestrian Concern benches on the Euclid Trail.

Euclid Trail - There need to be signs that say please
leash your dog. Maybe on the dog bag holder sign.

There should be some kind of button to push to scare Pedestrian Concern the coyotes away.

Continue bike lanes that Claremont has on Foothill Bicyclist Concern Boulevard into Upland
Foothill Boulevard Intersection mural at intersection of Monte Vista Other Avenue and Foothill Boulevard
Road surface is horrible/unsafe on Route 66 Bicyclist Concern Horrible,dangerous sidewalks in Upland. People are
afraid of walking on sidewalks. May get injured when Pedestrian Concern people put in a work order. Please fix
Great safety ideas. Make seniors aware of travel Bus Concern discounts.

As a mom, it would be amazing to have a safe, stroller Pedestrian Concern friendly trail.

Crosswalks in front of schools should have solar lights Pedestrian Concern General on the ground of the crosswalks and solar stop signs.

Upland Omnibus shuttle should connect to Omario.

Needs to run on the weekend so we can go to church
and shopping. I would like the heavy door van to be Bus Concern lighter to open and close.

Integrate sustainable design (using native plants for
tree canopies, bioswales,etc.) with behavioral design Other (increasing walkability and bikeability).

Great ideas.Would like feeling safer. Other
Gibson Senior Not enough bike racks at Gibson Senior Center. We are Center seniors. Bicyclist Concern a - a

LOCATION el OMMENTS alp CATEGORY
Hospital Parkway Crosswalk across Hospital Parkway is wide and NOT Pedestrian Concern conspicuous.

Sidewalks on Monte Vista Pedestrian Concern
From Foothill Boulevard to Pacific Electric Trail: urban tree canopy, rain gardens, permeable pavers, better Pedestrian Concern Monte Vista Avenue lighting, better separation of bike and pedestrian trails (multi-use path?)
Sidewalks both sides of Monte Vista from Arrow to Missing Sidewalk Foothill.

Make it beautiful Bicyclist Concern
Pacific Electric Trail Better lighting Bicyclist Concern Trail maintenance Bicyclist Concern
Pacific Electric Signal crosswalk at Campus Avenue and Pacific Trail and Campus Electric Trail Pedestrian Concern Avenue
San Antonio Want bike routes on San Antonio on north and south Bicyclist Concern Avenue sides towards Foothill Boulevard.

San Antonio Creek Class I multi-use path that follows San Antonio Creek Trail Access Channel from 210 to Pacific Electric Trail
Vons Store The Vons store needs a Bench inside the store for ADA ADA Concern to sit and wait for their transportation.

Walking path from 3rd Street to 11th Street on
Washington Street Washington shared bike and pedestrian - suggest to Pedestrian Concern L separate bike lane from pedestrian.

Community Workshop
Date: April 9, 2025
Location: Carnegie Library
Attendance: 42 attendees
I-
u.
ct
Table A-11: Draft Program Recommendations Comments
OMMEN "OMMENT CATEM
Z
c Bike sharing Bicyclist Concern
Resident discounts for bikes/maintenance Bicyclist Concern a)
tTry to extend the GoSGV (Go San Gabriel Valley) bike program to 2 Upland/San Bernardino County. Upland Resiudents are ineligible for bike Bicyclist Concern rentals
Promote "bike bus" programs over bike day. It's more sustaiable than a Bicyclist Concern single day,which fewer people participate in
a Recommend to the City to remove/revise parking minimums so that the big box stores don't get massive parking lots.This will free up space for Bicyclist Concern more bike/pedestrian infrastructure.
248 Page 593 of 707

Table A-12: Draft Future Bicycle Network Comments
LOCATION COMMENTS CATEGOR1
13th Street Speed humps + traffic calming on 13th too Traffic Calming Needed
"13th needs traffic calming efforts Traffic Calming 13th Street - stop signs Needed
- flashing lights"
13th Street& Euclid Stoplight needed at 13th Driving Concern Avenue
19th has a lot of freeway exist through traffic during Traffic Calming 19th Street afternoon rush hour. Need round about, speed sign, Needed curb extension
Extend 2nd Ave bike facilities north of Foothill as
2nd Avenue Bicyclist Concern
alternative to Euclid up to Colonis (?) y
2nd Avenue Alley along 2nd Ave could be alternative bike route Bicyclist Concern with signage
Campus Avenue Allow 20th to connect Driving Concern Campus Avenue
- near proposed Linear park opportunity Other Class I multi-use
path
Euclid Avenue Trees block light from street lights along Euclid. Unsafe Other at night
Euclid Avenue Pedestrian 'look'signage or'stop for pedestrians'at Pedestrian Concern Euclid path
Foothill Boulevard Continue new bike/ped facility in Rancho on Foothill Bicyclist Concern into Upland
Foothill Boulevard Need Class I or IV bike lanes south of Foothill to Bicyclist Concern connect with existing lanes north of Foothill
Mountain Avenue Does the volume/speed on Mountain Ave warrant Bicyclist Concern more than stripe bike class 2 lanes? y
Mountain Avenue Existing bike lanes @ Mountain & San Antonio are in the & San Antonio storm drains Bicyclist Concern Avenue
San Antonio Look into roundabouts + traffic calming + road diet to Traffic Calming Avenue slow speeding along San Antonio Needed
D
c
a)
a
Q

Table A-13: General Comments
LOCATION COMMENTS CATEGOR
13th Speed bumps are needed on 13th! Honestly police are Traffic Calming some of the worst offenders :( Needed
13th Traffic calming on 13th to prevent bypassing foothill Traffic Calming traffic Needed
Need more signal controlled pedestrian crosswalks
across 16th/Baseline Ave. Have to travel 1/2 mile to
16th Avenue major intersections. Prevents kids from walking to Pedestrian Concern Magnolia Elementry
16th Add bike island on 16th St for safety. Cars going too Bicyclist Concern fast& riding on bike lane. Class IV bike lane
19th &O'Malley 19th &O'Malley intersection missing crosswalk. It was Missing Sidewalk not put back after City did patch repairs (2020!)
19th st has major cut through traffic during afternoon
19th & O'Malley rush hours.They get off 210 EB @ mountain and turn left Traffic Calming on 19th,and continue onto Rancho. Need roundabouts, Needed speed signs,curb extensions to slow speed!
3rd Street & Trash on bike trail between 3rd & Campus (needs Bicyclist Concern Campus Avenue trashcans)
Carnegie Library This is a mobility workshop and there are no bike racks Bicyclist Concern in this facility.

Euclid west side between arrow + 9th has 5+
Euclid Avenue generations,4 generations. [Illegible] eliminate Driving Concern largetrucks semis + drag racing?
Foothill Boulevard There is no wheelchair ramp at Foothill and San and San Antonio Antonio (Westbound).The City has been asked to ADA Concern fix this problem for some time.This intersection is
Avenue
hazardous to people in wheelchairs.

General Look into changing municipal code to allow biking on Other sidewalks. It currently prohibited
General Dangerous Ebikes (fast!) on bike trail Bicyclist Concern Transportation for seniors. Bus to pick up seniors at
General home for those who cannot walk to specific OmniTrans Other pick up locations.
~ Bike racks should be this kind (straight top) not this General ce type (wavy top) - see image Bicyclist Concern G
a General Often rocks, litter,gravel,sand, potholes,etc.on street Bicyclist Concern z making it unsafe to bike
c General Dedicated bike lanes w/ curbed out pathway Bicyclist Concern Y_ All stop signs should be flashing,crosswalk clearly a) General marked Pedestrian Concern 2 Places with shade benches along bike&walking trails General would make non-car travel more appealing &safer in Other = high temps.Adding solar panels and outlets would be 16 extra nice if that's feasible
0 2
0 There should be signs/an educational campagin for C General motorists to understand that pedestrians always have Pedestrian Concern Q the right of way even if there is no crosswalk
D
250 Page 595 of 707

LOCATION OMMENTS CATEGORY
Consider recommending to the City to revise the
General Upland Municipal Code to lower barriers to bike riding/ Bicyclist Concern enforcement. UMC Sec 12.16.070, UMC Sec 10.64.010
General We need sidewalk ramps literally everywhere Missing Sidewalk Are drinking fountains or other resting ammenities
General covered in these grants.There are few places to rest/ Other refill for free along these routes. Also restrooms.

General App or hotline to report near hit&miss bike Bicyclist Concern General Consider bike parking once we ride to a destination Bicyclist Concern General Benches along trails would be helpful for disabed ADA Concern pedestrians&just nice to have for abled
General Additional traffic calming measures are neeed in all ADA Concern residential areas.

General Collision data include COVID lockdown (2020-2022) Other Why not shift it to 2009-2019?
General We need bike parking nearly everywhere in Upland Bicyclist Concern General I noticed no bike parking for this meeting... Bicyclist Concern The City should have shuttle buses during massive
General special events. That would increase pedestrian safety Bus Concern and will cut down on emissions.

The City should plan long-term development,
especially when it comes to issuing building
General permits. It would be good to discuss future positive Other and potentially negative impacts of,for example,
warehouses.

General What happened to the trash cans I asked for? It has Other been a while - Stacy Delosh
Western part of Upland (Monte Vista along Foothill)
Pacific Electric Trail is growing more dense. Prioritizing more North/ (near Monte Vista South access to the Montclair trans center would Common Avenue & Foothill be beneficial. Monte Vista and Central Avenue bike/ Destination Boulevard) walking connections to PET would be helpful too.

Thanks!
Pacific Electric Trail Consider leveling out the Pacific Bike Path between Bicyclist Concern (Campus &N 11th) Campus and N 11th Ave. too many bumps/curbs Pacific Electric Trail Please, more trees/shade for PE trail. How can we make Trail Access that route more attractive and pleasant to use?
Pacific Electric Trail better lighting on Pacific Electric Trail after dark.Also, Trail Access keeping motorcyclists off the trail
Pacific Electric Trail The PE trail needs more shade for hot days and lighting and 8th for nights + evenings. Same for 8th street (especial Trail Access east of Euclid)
San Antonio San Antonio South from Upland High to 8th is an Avenue important area to improve for biking to/from the high Bicyclist Concern school and underserved parts of Upland
c
a)
Q
a

Table A-14: Draft Priority Project Recommendations Comments LOCATION OMME CATES=
Mountain Avenue (Mountain Lane to 7th Street)
lye seen so many near collisions at the PE trail and
Mountain Avenue Mountain and at 7th and Euclid. Recommend more Bicyclist Concern lighting to make bike and pedestrians more visible
Mountain Avenue Make push button ADA accessble ADA Concern Mountain Avenue Consider passive pad detection if ped/bike vol are Pedestrian Concern high
Mountain Avenue -Recommend LP1 Driving Concern - Add dash lines to guide dual left turns
Mountain Avenue Not that safe to have a ped stage with a small median Pedestrian Concern Mountain Avenue Class IV - This street is very dangerous Bicyclist Concern Mountain Avenue Class IV lanes - Speed limit is 45 mph. Needs Bicyclist Concern separated bikeway
8th Street (Benson Avenue to 11th Avenue)
8th Street Class II would be better than III. Install no parking signs Bicyclist Concern since road in narrow
8th Street We need better bike access to Fern Reservoir Park and Bicyclist Concern Citrus Park on 8th St
I wold like to see this section between San Antonio&
8th Street Euclid improved! Thank you! Other
8th Street Class 4 bike lane Bicyclist Concern Euclid Avenue (24th Street to 7th Street)
Euclid Ave I like Class I path idea in the median Bicyclist Concern Euclid Ave Beautify w/ trees bike path west of Euclid Other Install signage all the way up Euclicd informing or
Euclid Ave reminding pedestrian right to cross and need for carsa Pedestrian Concern to stop even if no crosswalk
Euclid Ave Trees on Pacific bike trails bet - Euclid - San Antonio Other u.
cz
Implement measures to slow down speed of traffic
Euclid Ave Driving Concern
o _ (e.g.drag racers,speeding,etc)
a Remove tuck traffic from Euclid (Residents live here) to Z Euclid Ave Mountain Ave) Driving Concern L
0 Euclid Ave Will the Class I path connect seamessly with Class II Bicyclist Concern bike paths north of Foothill? y
c San Antonio Avenue (23rd Street to 7th Street)
0 2 San Antonio
Avenue Bike lane please! Bicyclist Concern
2 San Antonio Avenue Add trees for heat shelter to bike path Bicyclist Concern D
a San Antonio Let the same light system work for road and bike path, Bicyclist Concern Avenue like E Benson -keep PET straight w/o zig-zags 252 Page 597 of 707

LOCATION 41,111 COMMENTS CATEGORY
San Antonio Please improve San Antonio between 8th St and the Other Avenue Pacific Electric Trail.Thanks!
San Antonio Add bike lane Bicyclist Concern Avenue
San Antonio Class 4 bike lane would be better Bicyclist Concern Avenue
San Antonio Ave Pacific Electric Trail should continue straight across. Trail Access Not redirect via sidewalk&Vernon Dr
Memorial Park/13th Ave (Memorial Park to Pacific Electric Trail) Memorial Park/13th Paths for walking dog &strollers Pedestrian Concern Ave
Memorial Park/13th Class III bike routes create confusion for cyclists and Bicyclist Concern Ave divers
16th Street/Baseline Road (City Limits to Tanglewood Avenue) 16th Street/Baseline Better bike lane needed here.Cars turning right block Bicyclist Concern Road bike lane
16th Street/Baseline Benson needs a bike lane on both south and north Bicyclist Concern Road bound
16th Street/Baseline Bike lane to connect with Claremont Bicyclist Concern Road
16th Street/Baseline Give priority green lights so bikes can go before cars.

Road Cars turn right onto 210 Fwy and create hazardous Bicyclist Concern crossings
9th Street (Central Avenue to Grove Avenue)
9th Street Consider bollards that can be raised to shut off vehicle Other access during town events
11th Street (Monte Vista Avenue to Hospital Parkway)
llth Street Repave Redding Way. It leads to Foothill where it's Other possible to safely cross via bike/pedestrian
llth Street School curb is often flooded, curb openings? To drain Other water?
11th Street Yes, please! Pedestrian Concern
llth Street Yes, Please! Too may parents and kids cross where Pedestrian Concern there is no crossing guard
11th Street Yes, please improve bike access to Upland high! Bicyclist Concern 11th Street I like idea of making 11th bike& ped friendly Bicyclist Concern llth Street Monte Vista and 11th needs paved sidewalk up to Missing Sidewalk foothill and down to Arrow Hwy
Foothill Boulevard (Monte Vista Avenue to Grove Avenue) Foothill Boulevard Yes, please! Pedestrian Concern Meadowbrook Frontage Rd is the safest way to travel
here via bike. Consider Class IV bikepath so that
Foothill Boulevard Bicyclist Concern
it connects with existing Class IV path in Rancho Q Cucamonga at Foothill & Grove Blvd Q

LOCATION COMMENTS CATEGORY
Foothill Boulevard Yes! More public art and benches! Other Foothill Boulevard Please continue what Rancho is doing past grove! :) Other Foothill Boulevard A high priority section should be the south side of Bicyclist Concern Foothill near Central,where it is very unsafe to bike.

Arrow Highway (Claremont Boulevard to Grove Avenue)
Arrow Highway Class II would be better than Ill Bicyclist Concern Arrow Highway Orange grove st&Grove. No sidewalk Missing Sidewalk Arrow Highway Pacific Electric Trail. No sidewalk Missing Sidewalk Technical Advisory Committee Meetings
TAC Meeting#1
Date: June 26, 2024
Location: Virtual via Zoom
Meeting Facilitators: KTUA and KPA (Consultant team)
Attendees: City of Upland Councilmember District 4, City of Upland Public Works Department, City of Upland Parks, Arts, Recreation, and Community Services Department, Historic Down- town Upland Merchants, Omnitrans, Pedego Electric Bikes Upland, San Bernardino County Fire District Division 1, Upland Chamber of Commerce, Upland Police Department, Upland Unified School District
Minutes
Q&A about the Project
► Public Works shared that Upland does not have any Class IV facilities yet, but Claremont has recently implemented nice facilities. Rancho Cucamonga is also installing a two-way Class IV on Foothill Boulevard.
► Public Works shared that the City has also almost completed its Sidewalk Inventory Plan, which will be used alongside the Mobility Master Plan to enhance grant applications. a ► Public Works explained that the City wants to complete the plan by the end of 2025 be- cause the State's ATP grants occur every two years and the City wants to be ready to apply Zit for the ATP Cycle 8 grant in 2026. The Mobility Master Plan will help the City develop corn- petitive grant applications.

L
c
Guided Discussion
What kinds of mobility needs/wants does your organization have? 2 ► Pedego Electric Bikes is excited about the project and has had the Pedego Electric Bikes business for seven years, which was intentionally located along the Pacific Electric (PE) o Trail. Pedego Electric Bikes would like to see improved maintenance of the PE Trail in Upland (i.e., regular cleaning and upkeep), as well as enhancement projects (e.g., planting trees) to make it more attractive for bicyclists. The PE Trail is an asset for Upland and, if improved, 0 presents an opportunity to attract more people and more business to Upland. Pedego Electric Bikes feels that there are not as many people walking and biking on the PE Trail due to its poor condition and even tells people to keep riding east past Grove Avenue so they 254 Page 599 of 707

can get to the nice section of the PE Trail. More people riding along the PE Trail would stop in Upland if it was nicer. Pedego Electric Bikes has heard that there is more money and in- vestment in the trail east of Euclid Avenue, but not to the west. ► Public Works responded to share that he will look into the maintenance opportunities on the PE Trail west of Euclid Avenue. The City is working with SBCTA for ramps in the Downtown and signal near Campus Avenue at Washington Blvd. However, all of these improvements are east of Euclid Avenue. Palm Street crossing was recently finished. ► Omnitrans shared that from a bus service perspective, one of the difficulties for Omnitrans has been that they do not have control over ADA improvements. They have a whole data- base that tracks which bus stops are not ADA-compliant. Infrastructure for sidewalks would need to come from the City. Omnitrans would like to collaborate with the City to install im- provements for pedestrian improvements leading up to Omnitrans bus stops. Omnitrans can provide data and would like to work with the City to bring bus stops into ADA compli- ance.
► Public Works said that the City has worked with Omnitrans to make improvements,which usually takes place as a joint grant application. The City has the right-of-way and can widen sidewalks, etc., and is more than happy to work with Omnitrans.

Are there any projects or opportunities you'd like the City to be aware of? ► Pedego Electric Bikes says the City of Rancho Cucamonga is also developing an active transportation/mobility plan. The planning team rented bikes and rode around to expe- rience the bike infrastructure. They offered to provide bikes to the planning team to ride around Upland.
► Pedego Electric Bikes shared that their business offers bike safety courses. ► Upland Police Department shared that the Police Department has made a couple of new positions, including Park Rangers. Their job is to patrol the parks along with the bike paths to help with any crime along the bike paths.
► Upland Police Department shared that the City of Carlsbad released a Safer Streets To- gether plan which is a great package deal that engages citizens to educate each other on bicycle and pedestrian safety. The Plan presents a very extensive and impressive program.

They did a great job and have a lot of buy-in from the community. ► Omnitrans shared that they provide a micro-transit service (OmniRide) in Upland, which is similar to Uber, but provides service within a predetermined area. ► The OmniRide services Chino Hills, Upland, and Bloomington. Omniride is open to every- one. People can download and request rides via the app. Anyone can ride along fixed routes for $4 and seniors and people with disabilities can ride for $1. The OmniRide also extends service hours for special events, such as the Upland Lemon Festival. Omnitrans provides paratransit service.

What kinds of outcomes would you like to see in the Mobility Master Plan (e.g., infrastructure, policies, education, etc.)?
► Pedego Electric Bikes would like to see improvements to the PE Trail, better utilization of paths along floodway channels (e.g., formalize and maintain paths), and increased safety and maintenance along paths and trails.They hear that people choose not to ride bicycles because they do not feel safe.
► Upland City Councilmember asked if there was a possibility of providing a separate path along the PE Trail for pedestrians so that people walking can have a safe space without worrying about conflicts with bicyclists.
► KTUA responded that there appears to be space to add a DG trail and that is something Q that can be considered through the Mobility Master Plan. Q ► KTUA asked the Upland Police Department about the common bike/ped infractions seen within Upland. Page 600 of 707 255

► Upland Police Department responded that people ride on the sidewalk and ride bicycles against traffic, which is a big deal. Upland Police Department is concerned that, if there isn't proper education, more traffic collisions may occur if more people start to ride bi- cycles. Education will be an important part of making biking more common in Upland. ► Upland Police Department shared that these issues occur citywide and do not appear to be concentrated in any particular area or street type. ► KTUA asked if there were any top issues from the Fire Department's perspective. ► San Bernardino County Fire District Division 1 shared that the Fire Department is respond- ing to the aftermath of safety issues. Uneducated drivers and distracted drivers are an issue, so that may be a problem with more cyclists on the road. It will be important to educate the community on any changes that are coming. The Fire Department can collaborate with the City to conduct outreach and spread bike safety education and awareness.
► KTUA asked if there are elements of traffic calming or countermeasures that the Fire Department dislikes or that might hinder emergency response vehicles. ► San Bernardino County Fire District Division 1 responded that speed bumps and humps can be an issue, but some HOAs have them and it isn't a deal breaker and doesn't slow response times too much. The Fire Department won't be an obstacle to any mobility improvements as long as their rigs can get through. For example, speed humps with the wheel gaps are acceptable.

Who is missing at this meeting?Are there other agencies,organizations,or community cham- pions that should be included in the TAC?
► Public Works would like to get more feedback from schools and has tried to make contact.

Is there anything else you would like to share?
► Chamber of Commerce encounters many businesses and will share the survey with the business community, which may get some great suggestions throughout Upland. ► KPA responded that KTUA/KPA will provide flyers and a short blurb about the survey that TAC members can use to promote the project.

Visioning Exercise
► When asked about a collective vision statement for the Upland Mobility Master Plan, Upland Police Department emphasized the importance of safety. They want residents to think they can bike,walk, and travel safely in our City.They want people who come into the City to feel safe walking, rolling, or driving.
u.

TAC Meeting #2
zDate: September 11, 2024
L Location: Virtual via Zoom
0 c Meeting Facilitators: KTUA (Consultant team)
aw
Attendees: City of Upland Councilmember District 4, City of Upland Public Works Department, 2 Omnitrans, Roy's Cyclery, San Bernardino County Transportation Authority, Upland Police De- partment, Upland Unified School District
0 0
c
0 Q
256 Page 601 of 707

Minutes
Welcome & Project Overview
► City council member asked if the current construction project for a walking path along the PE Trail was related to this project. City staff clarified that the project was funded by SBCTA and not a part of the Mobility Master Plan.

Community Engagement Update & Discussion
KTUA provided a community engagement update and invited TAC members to suggest po- tential audiences and routes for future walk audits.
► City staff suggested combining Upland Elementary School and Upland Middle School be- cause they are back to back.
► City staff suggested doing walk audits at other schools, such as:
► Pioneer Middle School and Pepper Tree Elementary on 18th Street ► Cabrillo Elementary School and Baldy View Elementary School on llth Street ► Omnitrans noted that a fixed route on Foothill Boulevard, near Euclid Avenue, may be a good location for a walk audit. KTUA suggested that this could be the walk audit location for TAC Meeting #3.

Existing Conditions Analysis Summary & Discussion
KTUA presented high-level findings from the Existing Conditions Analysis and invited TAC members to provide input.
► City staff noted that the existing bike facilities map is incorrect, specifically along Euclid Av- enue where the Class II bike lane becomes a Class III bike route. KTUA responded that the map will be corrected.
► Omnitrans appreciated the mention of the OmniRide microtransit service and noted that while the service is available to Upland residents, not everyone knows about it. Additionally, people can take OmniRide and connect to a fixed route, including the Upland Train Station and Montclair Transit Center. KTUA also shared that there is not a fixed bus stop at the Up- land Train Station because the buses cannot navigate the small area. However, there is a bus stop nearby on Euclid Avenue.

TAC Meeting #3
Date: November 14, 2024
Location: Intersection of Foothill Boulevard and 2nd Avenue Meeting Facilitators: KTUA and Mark Thomas (Consultant team) Attendees: Omnitrans, Upland Police Department, Caltrans, City of Upland Public Works De- partment
Minutes
TAC meeting #3 was held as an in-person walk audit along portions of Foothill Boulevard and Euclid Avenue. Notes from this walk audit are provided in the 'Walk Audit' section of the Ap- pendix.
a)
Q
Q

TAC Meeting #4
Date: January 23, 2025
Location: Virtual via Zoom
Meeting Facilitators: KTUA (Consultant team)
Attendees: Caltrans, City of Upland Public Works Department, Omnitrans, San Bernardino County Transportation Authority, Upland Police Department, Upland Unified School District Minutes
Welcome & Progress Update
KTUA provided a project update, including that the UMMP is on schedule and is on track to be presented to City Council for adoption in June.

Preliminary Community Engagement Results
KTUA provided a community engagement update, including events and participation to date, as well as key takeaways from community input so far.

Group Discussion: Draft Bike Network
KTUA shared the existing bike network and draft future bike network proposed by KTUA. The goal of the draft bike network is to provide better connections to key destinations and make transportation by bicycling safer and more comfortable for people of all ages and abilities.

KTUA shared the methodology used to develop the draft bicycle network, which included looking for opportunities to provide connections to key destinations (especially parks and schools) and evaluating what is feasible within the existing road constraints (e.g., curb-to- curb widths, number of lanes, lane striping,on-street parking, speed limit,etc.). KTUA noted the draft network is currently undergoing City review so it's likely to change once the City provides comments on potential road diets, parking removal, and/or speed limit modifications. Major constraints include narrow residential streets with heavily utilized on-street parking, high-vol- ume or high-speed corridors, and speed limits exceeding the thresholds for Class Ill bicycle routes (per SB 1216).

KTUA said that TAC members will receive the draft bike network to review on their own and share comments via email by February 5th. KTUA asked if anyone would like to share initial reactions.

I
a ► SBCTA asked if we considered bus stop locations or if that will be included in the prioritiza- o tion process? KTUA responded that yes bus stop locations will be a criterion in the prioriti- a zation process.
► SBCTA asked where road diets are being proposed. KTUA responded that they are being explored along some corridors and KTUA is waiting for City feedback to refine the road diet c list. KTUA will share the analysis spreadsheet that we are using to track potential road diet a) locations.
► SBCTA asked if the City code has parking requirements for new development and if those are being considered in the UMMP. KTUA responded that he was unsure, but is aware that on-street parking is important.SBCTA suggested including any changes to parking require- ments for new developments that may be helpful for future grant applications. ► City staff asked why the Class Ill totals are going down from existing. KTUA responded that 0 some Class Ill would be upgraded to different facilities and that the numbers shown in the 'Proposed' column of the table are new facilities, not a total of existing and proposed. ► City staff shared that the speed survey will be presented to the City Council. However, most 258 of the speed limits will remain the same, except for three streets. Page 603 of 707

► City staff asked of the dashed green lines (Class III bike routes) would need to be 25 mph.

KTUA responded that under new legislation, SB 1216 (confirmed by SBCTA),Class III bicycle are not favorable and are not eligible for grant funding. SB 1216 prohibits Class III bicycle routes from being implemented on roads with speed limits greater than 30 mph, which will affect the proposed Class III (green dashed lines) on the map unless speed limits are reduced.
► KTUA asked if the speed survey was going to City Council next week and City staff said yes, and it will only include three changes. City staff shared that one section of Arrow Highway, between San Antonio Avenue and Euclid Avenue, is being reduced to 30 mph and said two other roads will have the speed limits increased. The rest of the posted speed limits will remain unchanged.
► City staff asked if there is a possibility of converting two-way streets to one-way streets to add bike lanes (e.g., in residential areas). City staff shared an example along 2nd Street channeling people towards Downtown. KTUA responded that what they have heard from transportation engineers is that people tend to drive faster. KTUA said that it would be pos- sible, but it would require more thought, design, and conversations with City staff to explore possibilities. KTUA said it could be a good candidate for a pilot/quick-build project, which SCAG likes to fund. SBCTA and KTUA suggested exploring one-way streets paired with traffic calming treatments (e.g. chicanes).
► City staff asked where the speed requirements for Class III come from. KTUA responded that they are coming from the recent legislation, SB 1216.
► KTUA mentioned that the UMMP will cover transit recommendations, including suggestions for expanding routes and improving bus stops based on what we've heard from commu- nity members and found in our data analysis.

Group Discussion: Prioritization Criteria
KTUA shared the prioritization criteria list, which will ensure the UMMP includes which projects to include in CIP based on not just objective analysis, but also community engagement. KTUA said that TAC members will receive the prioritization criteria to review on their own and share comments via email by February 5th and asked if anyone would like to share initial reactions. ► Omnitrans asked about how ADA accessibility factors into the prioritization analysis and does it fall under connectivity or transit stops. KTUA answered that the 'gap closure' criteria is referring to gaps in the existing bike network and KTUA will modify language to make that clearer. KTUA said that while ADA accessibility is not included in the prioritization process, the UMMP will include an inventory of ADA accessibility needs and recommendations. ► SBCTA asked if the City has an ADA Transition Plan. City staff said the City had a light one and recently completed an updated version.The new version will be adopted soon and the City will be able to begin implementation. SBCTA suggested integrating the ADA Transition Plan into the UMMP.
► SBCTA asked if the UMMP considered previously planned projects, including the SBCTA Cap- ital Project Needs Analysis (CPNA), Congestion Management Plan, and Measure I Funding.

KTUA responded that we did do a policy review, including upcoming road improvements, as part of the Existing Conditions Analysis and have a map of previously proposed bicycle facilities. However, KTUA will review the plans SBCTA mentioned to ensure consistency. ► SBCTA shared that SBCTA is looking at revisions for Measure I and shared that Measure I funding can be used to fund bike projects, like the Highland/Redlands Connector Project (Class I multi-use path). SBCTA shared that revisions to Measure I (updated in 2040) will include a heavy emphasis on bicycle, pedestrian, and transit projects. ► SBCTA shared that SBCTA will be reaching out to the TTAC to ask cities what projects should Q be included in the SBCTA Long Range Multimodal Transportation Plan. SBCTA suggested o that the City be prepared to share if any projects that they want to move quickly on and

that it is ok if the project isn't in an adopted plan yet. If there is an important project, the City should have those ready to go. City staff said that they will talk to the appropriate staff member (on the TTAC contact list) about this.

TAC Meeting #5
Date: June 25, 2025
Location: Virtual via Zoom
Meeting Facilitators: KTUA and Mark Thomas (Consultant team) Attendees:Caltrans,City of Upland (Public Works Department and Recreation and Community Services Department), City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services, Omnitrans Minutes
Welcome & Presentation
KTUA provided a presentation on the planning process and an overview of the draft Plan.

Group Discussion: Draft Mobility Master Plan
Note: TAC members were sent the draft Mobility Master Plan for review prior to the meeting. ► Caltrans and Omnitrans provided written comments on the draft Plan prior to the meeting related to formatting, clarity, and suggestions for updated data and additional guidance. ► City of Rancho Cucamonga shared that the draft Plan is an impressive document and they were pleased to see how the input from their Connect RC Bicycle Sub-Committee was integrated. They liked how the draft Plan identifies improvements for all travel modes and connectivity to neighboring communities and appreciate the proposed improvements to the Pacific Electric Trail.
► City staff and KTUA shared how impressive the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Connect RC Bicycle Sub-Committee was and asked questions about their group ride events. ► City staff asked about speed limits on corridors with proposed Class III bicycle routes. u.
a
a
z
L
C
0 C-
aw
4J
e
2 0
0 c
0 Q
260 Page 605 of 707

Walk Audits
Figure A-1: Walk Audit Notes: Route #1
oi,
Upland Junior High/Elementary Walk Audit Route 1 g up City of Upland Mobility Master Plan vk l
'L�ron
Thank you for joining us on today's Walk Audit!We will be walking a 0,8-mile route around Upland Junior High School and Upland Elementary School.We will be surveying two intersections and the corridors between.

Goals of the walk audit are to identify issues that may make pedestrians or bicyclists feel unsafe and opportunities for improvements.Some things to consider during our walk include pedestrian,ADA,and bicycle infrastructure,safety, wayfinding,and human behavior.
-Lane deliniators in front of Junior High go up before school and stay until NOTES:school letseut. :.•_!;:..y�-r1.-Jr t'1-- 1i-- -4j: k' -Drivers speed through stop signs early in the morning before school starts,but - • pedestrians are still present.
-Tree roots lift sidewalk and unmaintained/empty tree wells create tripping hazards. ' P YPP 9 .t a..: . r ," !
-School pick-up/drop-off is chaotic.People park illegaly and make illegal turn. -Tree branches are overgrown and block sidewalks.
-Sometimes kids will run to food vendors and cross street without looking. -Streets and sidewalks around the schools flood during rain,forcing people to walk through water to get to school. {
3t..c. '
-More street lighting is needed to improve safety of people walking to evening school events. _ •• •Bus stops do not have any amenities- Kids do take the bus to school. iltrZaririr ~J•-i� 'a- .r `A:
- -A . IL I Missing curb
1 ` I "F Could benefit from an -�• �i Curb ramps are missing ramp ��� { truncated domes.r i - _yi_6/ 1 p RRFB 1 ITT Intersection could ki
��""''��'' benefit from LED stop r
r , r
M , W
Pc �^— .-- 4. signs. j
�� a
• a r 11TH sT x
•
: 1.4.w.moR'-' .7-4
1 !i•• ;1 T Upland Junior High
;I.

Missing sidewalk n
• a This is the safer
_ •• Many tree wells are Peo le fr frequently
crossing and has a
missing trees and/or " Gibbyiis.Cafe 8c Bakery .y p e4 y crossin i� yy LL make illegal IeR turn g guard.Could causing tripping . I�f + 1x„ ;. l he enhanced with an into parking lot
,� hazards. —"•-w.-�-----' RRFB.

Ile .-
w
Missing curb ramp to
Graffiti an fence
� • 1 enter school parking lot

44. Unsafe crossing due to illegal
~ left turns and traffic getting Upland Elemcntaryi5[haol , into school lot.Better to • (e
.encourage people to cross at l
-
V. �-9 G St.or at mid-block crossing y ,
to the south. 1
;School parking lot 1
s � wuld be reoriented to
.� improve student drop-
' SA"
,? Padue Pasta
{ off.Swap parking with 4
drop-off zone for better Makers
' J •.i.r efficiency. Lu
. F r i �., — .,, .� n x
1111L--
`;Q '. > F :ate` - ...-- I. f:' * i'i;p Q bus stops do not have -
• 1 17 any amenities.No red y • r.1 Q curb in front of bus
stops-cars parkin
student
ofnt bus stop-up.during Page 606 of 707 261 student pick-up.

Figure A-2: Walk Audit Notes: Route#2
�{ q.L OF'bNt
Upland Junior High/Elementary Walk Audit Route 2 eiN•eli➢bd

4. =n
City of Upland Mobility Master Plan
°c rruxzst '•••
Thank you for joining us on today's Walk Audit!We will be walking a 0.8-mile route around Upland Junior High School and Upland Elementary School.We will be surveying two intersections and the corridors between.

Goals of the walk audit are to identify issues that may make pedestrians or bicyclists feel unsafe and opportunities for improvements.Some things to consider during our walk include pedestrian,ADA,and bicycle infrastructure,safety, wayfinding,and human behavior.
-Kids bike and skateboard on the sidewalks,but the sidewalks are cracked lk ,'.1-,-7 r '+'t''T"P.'.., `-P.n, ,:- . -- NOTES:and uneven.
-Flashing lights are needed at crosswalks to increase pedestrian visibility. ---Potholes are dangerous and create tripping hazards(e.g.,crossing guard was injured) -Flashing LED stop signs would increase visibility.

I
Cars park in red zones during school pick-up.

Jr There are more skateboarders than bicyclists.
1-1 Crosswalk markings are faded. . 71.. `
-There have been issues with unhoused population.
-Raised crosswalk at Elementary School.
-Interested in safety patrol. • :• ;4• .. k l.: I
Vehicles irse 3rd to Lane delineators go up Red zone paint is faded. .4 i.,tip.,•., Jmake U-turns. o_ .
during school hours. 0 2
ce
o
m 11.TH ST =
Lrl
UpLind Junior Hig
,! . :. r__L..
,2y' Uplifted Sidewalk
x t .. . ...---- r \'
Add reflectors. • . .' • - . . 1
H
LL
el =L —. 3Rt7.AVE -- - v..
oo
al I-
, r_ r : , __=... 0,
..!ril h f 1
US P1)st Office
LT. _ n
cn 7• - L
lip' n PPadue Pasta
..4:-: -�° •
. .'� .r €Makers
w
' fir, .• �'r it
lOTH 57 ❑
ce
c N .
• Congestion during
• 1. - school pick-up/drop-off i (I) Q
D
262 Page 607 of 707

-n
F t
Pacific Electric Trail Walk Audit NOTES:
64° °p az zo` a C
City of Upland Mobility Master Plan -New DG trail is adjacent to the PE Trail from 3rd Avenue to Campus Avenue. cp -Some of the street signs along the PE Trail are faded. �`r'°"�lP i W
Thank you for joining us on today's Walk Audit!We will be walking 0.8 miles along the -PE Trail assets include great shade trees,public art,seating,and plazas. — ktua Pacific Electric Trail.We will be surveying one intersection and an urban trail. -The blank wall east of 11th Avenue is an opportunity for a mural. Q Goals of the walk audit are to identify issues that may make pedestrians or ` 4. > bicyclists feel unsafe and opportunities for improvements. D C
__ a
Some things to consider during our walk include pedestrian,ADA,and bicycle z infrastructure,safety,wayfinding,and human behavior. 0 cD
cn
0 C
DST cD
,li
al
i
'�' L it
_- �t 1 New DG frail installed Ilk
- New signal and
PE Trail is a bii narrow here q r s �. •t by SBCTAcrossing for Great shade trees along �•
The new DG trail will help R �. F pedestrians and „• y, most of the PE Trail. r• Curb ramps are _ decrease conflict between p cyclists a' •pedestrians and bicyclists by ' �' _ _ missing truncated encouraging pedestrians to use yr - domes r the DG trail. - - E-.� — ! I Upland Peace Churc �.. .� If
Pacific. WASHINGTON ST
"• • Electric +
Trail ,,. _. `
a '(e, t - �+ '''¢ s fR' —+ '. ��2r to p .1,,r I Shade trees disappear 1 = r.Public ad and • ,�, ', 'Ev _ fora short segment I �•-yti. . �t - pedestrian plazas exist • Q •
_ •• I •� after east of Campus
X0'\, r Stop sign for vehicles is -' Avenue - a E Trail crossing, jy ,�
I 'T�i ,"4 * so drivers are not
L - ,�'�'., prompted to stop and w --� �__ I look for ped/bikes ,=.. ',-%� I .�.. 1::`� — ' ,A ° crossing.Opportunity to r -. '• ; ••+ CST relocate stop to occur ,' .!.. 0 w
i a ( 7• before crosswalk. ' •,,„ �. , �. ;'� L, IH •• • itii
Gibson Senior Center I I s,■.I •l i, • -_ - I t . .„. ti•
171
CD
O
CD
t)
O
00 O
v
O
v
CD Appendix
w

rn Upland Mobility Master Plan FINAL DRAFT
R4 ov ea C Y f Wand CO
9th Street Walk Audit 6 d
City of Upland Mobility Master Plan 9, ktua / `` N C94;317;4P Moenity Master Plan >
I
Thank you for joining us on today's Walk Audit!We will be walking a 0.8-mile loop along 9th Street.We will be surveying five intersections and the corridors between them.

Goals of the walk audit are to identify issues that may make pedestrians or bicyclists feel unsafe and opportunities for improvements.Some things to consider during our walk include pedestrian, Q ADA,and bicycle infrastructure,safety,wayfinding,and human behavior.

D
c
NOTES: _ Q
z
-Many sidewalks are cracked an very uneven.Some sidewalks are lifted several inches off of the ground,creating tripping and accessibility issues. •_• z -Some curb ramps are missing truncated domes r 9TH ST < ) N
-9th Street and 11th Avenue intersection has very faded crosswalk markings and is missing curb ramps. 0 C
0 CD
it
lig i'
x -
APP' • irip 40- W • .

Z 'a
O C LL
m 9TH ST a
ww '
Ui
W
Z N
J =
H Crossing could be Crosswalk markings at Q enhanced with an intersection of 9th a RRFB,if needed. i Street and 11th Avenue 0 are very faded and
missing curb ramps.

Would benefit from
enhanced markings,
signage,cub ramps, 3
AR
and possibly an RRFB. I-))
m
Z
a- ¢ 9TH ST m
o V o m
N cc rn
m
t •4-• —i
_ jOpportunity to enhance
intersection with high- rCA
-•` ivisibility crosswalk markings.

TJ
0)
CC)
CD
0)
O
CO
0 v
O
v

of Up TI
San Antonio Avenue Walk Audit Route 1 /��
9d
City of Upland Mobility Master Plan >' / `. ktuft.,• fo
c9.t1F784t7.
— I
cri
Thank you for joining us on today's Walk Audit!We will be walking a 0.77-mile loop along San Antonio Avenue.We will be surveying three intersections and the corridors between them.

Goals of the walk audit are to identify issues that may make pedestrians or bicyclists feel unsafe and opportunities for improvements.Some things to consider during our walk include pedestrian, Q ADA,and biking infrastructure,safety,wayfinding,and human behavior.

D
NOTES: -Most residential driveways are not ADA-compliant. -Some sidewalk repairs are needed. z
-Lots of speeding occurs along San Antonio Avenue.City staff can provide speed study results and Average Daily Traffic Volumes.

Illegal left turns out of � • z
-No existing bike facilities,but San Antonio Avenue can likely accommodate a road diet to make space for Class IV Separated Bikeways. school parkinglot SAN ANTONIO`AVE CT
-PE Trail needs design standards to promote safety,visibility,and activation(e.g.Crime Prevention throough Evironmental Design). N Z7
-DG trail adjacent to the PE Trail should be extended west of Euclid Avenue. O C
r-r
-Opportunities to work with future developers to enhance PE Trail and other bike/ped facilities. -At school release,long queue of vehicles leaving HS that clears in 15 minutes. -Bicyclists seen riding on the sidewalk and in the street. 01 e 3
' z
� — Z
ri4 A. m
-� SAN ANTONIO AVE '` m
A _ tr' m
iic-
_ T o Missing crosswalk 3 Crossing guard is present on ' The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day �"�-� I Z markings and truncated Upland Brethren in north and west legs of Saints - '� domes on curb ramps 'Christ Church m 9 I Residential driveways do not appear to be ADA-compliant.Difficult to navigate with wheelchair �t intersection to help Baldy View ,. --1 � iElementary students cross safely.
~ _ Missingg�cated .� Pacifc F r domes on curb ramps All curb ramps are Electric, 2ix
z • ,.missing truncated Trail
E z - .. .domes.Intersection d 3 y. could benefit from high- O. H 'visibility crosswalk ❑
w `.n
w = SAN ANTONIO AVE markings at all legs. z' � ~. Z,
w Uneven' sidewalk
Lu
Z F
7 2 w {
IdirQ Upland Brethren in Intersection could J i ¢ PE Trail could be improved by realigning 2 It Christ Church benefit from high- i Pacific Community the trail to direct users to existing visibility crosswalk ,A,• Center • signalized intersection to cross. 171 markings at all legs.

CO
CD
Cs
CD
0 v
O
v
fV
rn Appendix
01 rn Upland Mobility Master Plan FINAL DRAFT
O)
-More bicycle parking is needed. 4 of ut.

Downtown Upland Wa I k Audit NOTES: Should be located in highly visible areas,such as in front of businesses. 0 % c -Pet waste stations and trash receptacles are desired,particularly along 1st Avenue. CI;of Upland Mobility Master Plan °,t Foams°P -Opportunities to increase pedestrian visibility through high-visibility croswalk markings, D curb extensions,RRFBs,and LED stop signs. i
Thank you for joining us on today's Walk Audit!We will be walking 0.9 miles along 1st, -Some parklets are encroaching on sidewalks. ktu 2nd,and 3rd Streets.We will be surveying nine intersections and the corridors between -Consistent landscaping is desired throughout downtown and in dirt/turf areas. 1 them. Empty tree wells and dirt/turf patches should be filled with new landscaping. Q ,cry fvy6,,\
-More lighting is desired in the areas surrounding downtown. �j, Goals of the walk audit are to identify issues that may make pedestrians or bicyclists feel c unsafe and opportunities for improvements. -Pedestrian-scale lighting is not bright enough. Q -People on e-bikes can be reckless in this area. Z Some things to consider during our walk include pedestrian,ADA,and bicycle O infrastructure,safety,wayfinding,and human behavior. Drivers make illegal U-turns at 1 st/9th and 9th/D intersections. rt -Red curb paint is fading. ccnn
- O
s r LED stop signs are Pet waste stations and - _y C-r M i desired at this 15T_AVE .trash receptacles are - r Opportunity for curb (p i +.; •1 intersection to increase d needed along 1st extensions - .�,,,•.. pedestrian visibility. *Or Avenue. j• ` •
f T`_:. CA
� _ The Local The Offices at .e •��‘a ' � • ' l I � CC
Ir
�. z ts±...! Baker and Cafe ,y% " a ¶. - V Upland Inn + �I ♦ i 0
�� Ail
! - diii ; .� s RRFB or other4.

O
? ;_, !,.�. - • pedestrian signal �� ' t L
_ would help improve ,i if: '",apt pedestrian visibility at �- Pedestrian crossings t -,r•-
i - '.•• this crossin
- 1 t -, areconfusingand Upland Jrw„� _ g �= p Second Parklet encroaches I -�� • 1 _ - dangerous.Signage Chamber of on sidewalk. .I . r"r� H1111 - 1 ''' 'k' Upland Vacuum may help. Commerce Avenue I Lucky!s Coffee . , &Sewing Saloon, i Roasters-`

1. H 2ND AVE v = F
o ,r I v) o. .., ✓ r = tiki ,ads yy✓.- _ o " _ir I P . . F. - ,� s. °' - Opportunity for curb f Axe Stardust T - Studio M extensions. Ot _ ` a - v , .' �.�1r! Bench obstructs - " E , • Lair Alley ...pp
T sidewalk. V ntage 1 Pacific Salon i, LL
f jf `:" I 1 �I t Vault - Electric j iv.A _ Y1 • I_��q + - V Trail !' i I . 1 _ j ,._ • ' 1 - I r LI y, it ram! JL .� �y_ I -• • �' —r ---- - " f Opportunity for high- �. _ --- -• - 1, _ ' / - Opportunity for high ♦�,-, visibility crosswalk x 141 y< k. 10 11 = visibility crosswalk �•� a�r,T��., ;� markings. r� - k • j,,,
'i r t�1. markings. t-, �rlQrlo .'' r1 !. 'if ",p 3 ,:. .+v r E �.0 �`ChurchofGod - -- iliC' 4 ` w I I t - _ '' `'g SW Region 1l 1\• Amistad 1 , '� t •' Christiana tl ' = D
�1 Opportunity for curb �Ale"
e + / 3RDAVE : r. , '•''.extensions. t CD
CO
(D
t)
O
v
O
v

:Up
Gy�4�. Lq�tl c¢y of Upland
Euclid Trail Walk Audit i-�� . C
City of Upland Mobility Master Plan r ktua cD Ol-;,17 mow*master Wen >
I
Thank you for joining us on today's Walk Audit!We will be walking a 0.96-mile route along Euclid Avenue.We will be surveying three intersections and the corridors between them. u Goals of the walk audit are to identify issues that may make pedestrians or bicyclists feel unsafe and opportunities for improvements.Some things to consider during our walk include pedestrian, Q ADA,and biking infrastructure,safety,wayfinding,and human behavior. - C
NOTES: -Class II bicycle lanes are very tight between vehicle travel lanes and parked cars.Need more separation. ' l' a 'bI '-r
-Missing sidewalks north of 13th Street. + Z +w 0
-Curb ramps are missing truncated domes at Eugene Court. EUCLID AVE N t N
-No pedestrian crossing signal at 13th Street crossing.Pedestrians have to go to 12th or 14th Street intersections.

O
-No crosswalks where pedestrians on the Euclid Trail need to cross traffic. C rr
-City applied for a grant to limit through traffic at 13th Street intersection. CIlir [D 00 I
Chase Bank _ H 3
ibi' e 44,4r,„:, ,.., _
tn
u No path from sidewalk 46% ��104044606 o to trailhead. ce z
> m
m j I— n
EUCLID AVE mJ /
co
G Buckle in the sidewalk. t 1
VIIMI0
w7 1 Z
w
Z
Curb ramps are - -n
missing truncated Missing sidewalk. (Di—I domes.

F
ul
FC
H
a
O —~ t, EUCLID.AVEe" \ /
w V
w C
z
J
V
H
a
2 .Missing slidewalk. -I J. - — ._ 0 C0
CD
C)
N
O
v
O
v
IV
rn Appendix

rn Upland Mobility Master Plan FINAL DRAFT
co
Foothill Boulevard/Euclid Avenue Walk Audit iOF../.4\ ""°'v%' ktu '�'`����
City of Upland Mobility Master Plan )I i Cp 9�lFOR4l
D
Thank you for joining us on today's Walk Audit!We will be walking a 0.84-mile loop along Foothill boulevard and Euclid Avenue.We will be 00 surveying three intersections and the corridors between them.

Goals of the walk audit are to identify issues that may make pedestrians or bicyclists feel unsafe and opportunities for improvements.Some things to consider during our walk include pedestrian,ADA,and bicycle infrastructure,safety,wayfinding,and human behavior.

D
c
a
NOTES:-Class II Bike network gap on Euclid between Foothill and Arrow,and between 9th and 6th Street,south of 6th Street turns into Class Ill. Z O
-Uneven sidewalk pavement,particularly on Euclid Avenue,potentially due to improper street tree establishment. FS- to
-Pedestrian signal timing adjustment is needed at 2nd/Foothill,11th/Foothill,and Euclid/Foothill. 50 -Bus stops on Euclid Avenu are not ADA compliant. C rr
-No marked crosswalk at south leg of 2nd/Foothill intersection. O 1) #
-Note Class IV Separated Bikeways exist on Foothill Boulevard west of city limit and are being built east of city limit. CD ,Raising giiig!s
.Chicken„Fingers
l\ f i,
Qw
o FOOTHILL BLVD a
' ./ _ o
u u
z
w
Gap in Class II Bicycle No crosswalk here.
\ U.S.Bank Branch Lane O
I �..

U.S.Bank Branch +� '
lik
i ` I
m 1*V
EUCLf D ACE � ~^V = ♦+- ' IS �, Bus stops are not ADA Ar t:' s compliant.

O 1
Presbyterian Church O
fl)
CQ
CD
C)
CA)
0 v
O
v

Foothill Boulevard Walk Audit 44 OF tr
o
t-',
City fL amdCO
City of Upland Mobility Master Plan ktu N `44.578.0P D
MabilitY=azbr Plan
1 CO
Thank you for joining us on today's Walk Audit!We will be walking a 0.9-mile loop along Foothill Boulevard.We will be surveying three intersections and the corridors between them.

Goals of the walk audit are to identify issues that may make pedestrians or bicyclists feel unsafe and opportunities for improvements.Some things to consider during our walk include pedestrian, a ADA,and bicycle infrastructure,safety,wayfinding,and human behavior.

D
. C
NOTES:-Pedestrian crossing time should be increased at Euclid/Foothill intersection. 0_ r-r
_Curb ramps at Euclid/Foothill are missing truncated domes. O -Bicycle lanes could benefit from green conflict striping to increase visibility. FOOTHILL BLVD < CAD More lighting is desired south of Foothill Boulevard. I O
-Driver education to promote pedestrian and bicyclist safety is desired. -Crosswalk markings are faded all over. C -r
-Some walkways between sidewalks and parking lots are blocked by curbs. (D -Maintenance is needed to trim trees,repair sidewalks,and repaint faded crosswalks. O i_ r
0 Vons Fuel Station Rising Lene's 0 �'
�' chic.:en F'u gers
aP
Curb ramps are p FOOTHILL BLVD /� ¢, w missing truncat4.ed Uplift in sidewalk , \ �o =- en domes. 7 S N
N w
i ` -
.,
F-
_`,, $;', U.S.Bank Branch IC2i V{ ICurb ramps are '• :L-. F ,
et missing truncated Sign is blocking the ��` • 2,-.� domes. sidewalk. ^ice `A
Kahramana Restaurant Vons Fuel Station 3 x
` ' z
FOOTHILL B D 411IF m
in
Opportunity to enhance I -" _ m
} crosswalk with high-
visibilitymarkings. - �7 _r!r . p o Sightlinc issues at SE ,�, .��,, m n &Nw corners. m
n -1
cc Kishi Japanese Restaurant t - 4
1 li 'Or
171
co
CO
CD
rn
0 0
rn Appendix
co

Upland Mobility Master Plan FINAL DRAFT
0 South East Upland Walk Audit oF�p T
NOTES: �" tad •Q
City of Upland Mobility Master Plan Sidewalk Crack/ a�' cD •
pothole
t FORS D
1 Thank you for joining us on today's Walk Audit!We will be walking along Campus,9th, A Sidewalk Buckle ku p and Washington Streets.We will be surveying six intersections and the corridors between - • Sidewalk Uplift 1 them. *G
Better Conditions c,ty/.4: 0
__
Goals of the walk audit are to identify issues that may make pedestrians or bicyclists feel than shown unsafe and opportunities for improvements. Sidewalk is wavy/ Mo,,,„M,,,,,,• c ti uneven/has 0_
Some things to consider during our walk include pedestrian,ADA,and bicycle driveway cuts z infrastructure,safety,wayfinding,and human behavior. 0 !D
cn
PJ
0 Pacific i .a C
Electri WASHINGTON ST WASHINGTON BLVD • CD Trail _ • .r #
•
' 11.- 1 1° 1 ' 11 L_ - :- i •N ', L- il i --1 ") - ■V _ T
J:T
—`�[' CST a i a E Ir a �7 7---1- / I •
11P iii
•
7 44 1
I i
6 ■ I tg L• �'1 ii:"
i, 9TH ST -
..... - y n. � ,, S, , '4_ ,o,—=1— 11:- .,
1 ,, do
u., '11 -i --..r‘ ',..--i,‘,. il
ra LT ! i f 1 qdr 1
,.�. .� OO
sv
c0
cn
0 0

San Antonio Avenue Walk Audit Route 2 �40FPPt"" fay ofyfanr City of Upland Mobility Master Plan ' ' 'o ktua '`` '4Z1FoffS Mobility Masser Plan
Thank you for joining us on today's Walk Audit!We will be walking a one-mile loop along San Antonio Avenue.We will be surveying three intersections and the corridors between them. ..

Goals of the walk audit are to identify issues that may make pedestrians or bicyclists feel unsafe and opportunities for improvements.Some things to consider during our walk include pedestrian, Q ADA,and biking infrastructure,safety,wayfinding,and human behavior.

D
Vehicles speed along San Antonio Avenue. Q NOTES:
-Maintenance is needed along sidewalks to repair cracks and fill empty tree wells. z -Low hanging branches with thorns between Amber Court and 11th Street. SAN'ANTONIO AVE CD -Curb ramps are missing truncated domes in several areas,including Orchid Court,Amber Court,Pine Street,and 13th Street.

C I N
M
O
C
r-r
© (D
iv
3 DIntersection feels
Steep crowning of road. 0
unsafe. o I
� I" PrimeWash Express C
g p Z
a > Ed co
o > m
// �!

SAN ANTONIO AVE
m
1r F co
.All curb ramps except p O
ISw corner are missing -I
` truncated domes. O
3 I. Upland High School ?
"witi
o shade,street light posts,or trash -neceptacles along this area. - l— V
' ,3 i
•
Curb ramps are all
_ ' missing truncated
U a
domes.
a a/\J Z
O =
w Overgrown vegetation. L.
w V
N /SAN ANTONIO AVE \ F Z1 =
J l I-
xo
C
F
Q
2 Luxury Nails and Spa 0
DO
CC)
CD
0)
0)
0 —h
O
v
Appendix

Figure A-12: Walk Audit Notes: Route#13
op UA
Upland High School Walk Audit ku� •
=W
City of Upland Mobility Master Plan `'z,:. , _�,, Thank you for joining us on today's Walk Audit!We will be walking a one-mile loop around Upland High School.We will be surveying four intersections and the corridors between.

Goals of the walk audit are to identify issues that may make pedestrians or bicyclists feel unsafe and opportunities for improvements.Some things to consider during our walk include pedestrian,ADA,and bicycle infrastructure,safety, wayfinding,and human behavior.

NOTES:-Vehicles speed along Foothill Boulevard and San Antonio Avenue. -The three crosswalks along 11th Street are missing curb ramps.-Desire for a pedestrian signal at the Ukiah Way crosswalk. 1-Rain water puddles at the NE and NW corners of the 11th Street and San Antonio Avenue i intersection.
l-More bus stop seating and shelter space is desired at the bus stop at the corner of Foothill Boulevard and San Antonio Avenue. A Sidewalk is uneven at the western end of 11th Street. V -People ride bicycles and skateboards on the sidewalks around the school. . > >-
:•A•,
•" } l � a Desiie for pede�:triari
a,ll l• w(IIr signal hcre 0
` t:• a g 1 yLt
a
4 -• in HIrkt L•1TU;ST = � >�- - Z. °. `�`." Upland High Schoo
4 . ...t yr
n:1110A1 �i
-. - Rain puddles gather' •
❑ e • - - here,obstructing
w Add curb ramps where
ce• _ pedestrian path of
- '.missing.missing.
!ravel.
h":f'ail Prep al the Fly ii _
> - Vi 0;A- rig - • m
J ti N
_ -" • - REDDING WAY
F z
°LLo ---- -
Upland High Schoo!
U. -
Q
0 ,e rill lJpland Ford SP:'Ju:F
Heavily used bus .�..r,�
Z slop by students. y�Y fr -
¢ Seating/shelter _ .:. r •
LL 0 would benefit from - -.• FOOTHILL BLVD c o expansion.

5. •4
cZ . Harden dirt pia A4 )s. Upland High School o Lxi
G • a-l� .Ph ua af$p�ess
j V Students cross here. o - -. -
p " AI
J+"�. w ic Would benefit from _ 1
crosswalk markings. 0 .-•-. o
¢ p L
- _ • giiiii,
ti '�NTONIOAVE - -� m
C -,
F _ _ Y
o

10. "ft.. 2.•
D Upland High Schuol
272 Page 617 of 707

Community Survey
Figure A-13: Survey Question #1
What form(s) of transportation do you use in Upland,other than a car?Select all that apply. 100%
90%
80% 76%
70%
60%
50%
40% I 38%
30% 19% 20%
20% 4� 7% 10% 7%
10% . . _
0/
`�`��o I* ``N� o6 IP ``� aka ` .
ko e
44" o�;`�� 4b` o�y`o 4e" ,JQ eyQ
�� t�' ��t` Keay
o,`5` esooa �� e.c
e`�oto
,,z> eye oar
ear •°
re
Open-ended Responses: ► Walking specifically with a stroller ► Inline Skating
► Inline Skates/Rollerblades ► Paratransit Access Services ► I walk around my neighborhood for exercise • Roller skating and to enjoy outside
► Stroller ► Metro a line if it ever comes to upland ► Strollers ► Roller skates
► Jog to the colonies ► I do not bike be I don't feel safe doing so ► I rely on others to get around due to disability. ► Rollerblading I generally try to avoid the bus as it is not only ► Car, Airplane (Cable Airport CCB) highly inconvenient, bus when I do use the ► Car
bus, the drivers take off before I am able to ► Omni on demand take a seat causing me a great deal of pain Uber/Lyft for at least the rest of the day sometimes lon-
ger. ► Use both car &walking
► Car ► Motorcycle
► Car ► Only a car to do errands,walk for exercise ► Do not take car line away for any other pur- ► Rides from neighbors pose. ► motorcycle
► Electric Vehicle ► I am 70 years old...your plan is absurd for the ► E bike elderly!!! I will move if implemented; Upland ► Family and friends changing too woke. x .773
► Omi-ride &Omni-asses Electric bike
► OmniRide Uber a
► Omni ride • Uber aa
► Car ► Uber
► Uber Page 618 of 707 273

Figure A-14: Survey Question #2
How often do you walk or roll (wheelchair,scooter,skateboard,etc.) in Upland? 100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40% 35%
30% 28%
20% 14% 13%
10%
10% -0%
Daily 2-4 days per 2-4 days a month A few times a I don't walk or week year roll in Upland
Figure A-15: Survey Question #3
I walk or roll in Upland for(Select all that apply):
100%
90%
79%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40% 36%
I-
30%
u. 20% 15%
cg 9% 10%
10% ■ _
Zit 0%
T.

Errands Recreation or Commuting I don't walk or Other (please a exercise roll in Upland specify)
a) Open-ended Responses: ► Dog walking
After practice ► Drinking downtown
► Climbing gym(needs a better way to safely ► Dropping off kids to school cross the railroad,through second street onto ► Escuela ° Stowell. ► Exercise
► Close food pick up ► Exercise
0 ► Dinning ► Exercise and errandsi
► Doctor appointments ► Fitness
► Doctor's appointment ► From parking lots to downtown restaurants 274 ► Dog walk ► Go out to eat /drink Page 619 of 707

► Going out to eat ► Travel by train
► I am 70 years old...your plan is absurd for the ► Use bicycle when possible elderly!!! ► Visiting businesses
► I walk four or five times a week to the YMCA to ► Visiting friends exercise there. ► Volunteering at Fields of Upland Animal Shelter ► I'm unable to walk due to mobility issues it's ► Walk dogs to parks drive or stay home • Walk my dogs
► I'm a crossing guard ► Walk my kids to school. ► Kid's school
► Walk my son
► Library ► Walk to Downtown upland only
► Medical and therapy ► Walk to restaurants etc
► Medical Appointments • Walking dogs
► School ► Walking kids to school
► shopping eating in HDU • Walking kids to school ► Store ► Walking my dog
► street faires/events • Walking my dogs
► taking kids to school • Walking the dog
► To and from work ► We will walk to downtown on occasion ► To be with friends
► When car is at mechanic
► To get around • Work
► To get ice cream
► To go to local shops within walking distance ► Work Figure A-16: Survey Qusetion #4
What do you see as barriers to walking or rolling in Upland?Select all that apply. 100%
90%
80%
70% 62%
60% 54%
50%
40%
30% 24% 25% 23%
20%
19% 15%
10% 19910
9% 7% 4%
0/
■ II ■ ■
>_ >_ a1 ++ ofto
v., qp of of
O O Y - O to c
a+ _ . fa V
a, 3 as 3 ea s u, L Q. aU
t to O >_ H L C O f0 D o.
cu � C o 2 -0 Vf
u C
c co 2 o u u O = fC
▪ "a co ++ Y Y p O a1
▪L 3 dA i fC - u Q.

O .= O fn rn ow .4 i C L to i H a„. rn C O a)
a .� u MO 0 c O 0 .� s
oL C £ aOf c u .a O O n Q. }' 0 x i 0 u aJX
dA a) N �; aJ ++ �_ a, c -o C fG *' Oi L L O Q - -o a) ra 0 u aJ aJ Z — a
0 _f: N C +' j O a
cC tea = 0 13 Q
3 N —
a)
in Page 620 of 707 275

Figure A-17: Survey Question #5
Places that I frequently travel to in Upland are too far to get to by walking or rolling. 100%
90%
80%
70% 61%
60%
50%
39%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
True False
Figure A-18: Survey Question #6
How often do you bike in Upland?
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
48%
50%
40%
30% 21%
20% 13% 14%
10% 4%
0%
Daily 2-4 days per 2-4 days a month A few times a Never week year
Figure A-19: Survey Question #7
a I bike in Upland for (Select all that apply):
p 100%
90%
z
80%
c
o 70%
L
60% 50%
cn 50% 46%
40%
30%
o 20% 17%
10% 8/ °
3/
_in,
Q 0%
Errands Recreation or Commuting I don't bike in Other (please exercise Upland specify)
276 Page 621 of 707

Open-ended Responses: ► I do not bike be I don't feel safe biking ► I don't bike through as much as I did because
► And this is only in the neighborhoods, or up to of flat tires and homeless the colonies for coffee. Also to Cable Airport ► I would like to bike but have not as yet for fun..Too crazy to attempt crossing Foothill
and that area. ► I'm going to get an electric bike and will be ► Because it's dangerous. Not just in Upland using it but right now now ► Bike lanes a waste of tax payer money Tandem bicycling I'm blind. ► Dinning ► to and from work to my home.
► Going out to eat ► To get ice cream
► I am too old to ride a bike. ► We have a group that takes part in a Christ- mas bike ride, however we take the bike path
to Claremont. DTU doesn't offer much.

Figure A-20: Survey Question #8
Do you use an a-bike in Upland?
100% 85%
80%
60%
40%
20% 15%
0%
Yes No
Figure A-21: Survey Question #9
What do you see as barriers to biking in Upland?Select all that apply. 100%
90%
80%
70%
60% 51%
50%
40% 39%
30% 31%
30% 25%
20% II 18% °
13/
6%
10% 3%
0%
8 c to v+ L - a
o o c = c 4—
s `� 15 a v
a1 Y C M = c 0 CD D VI
Q
a . O 1 .o a1 v >. •E VI
_a) i ++ a1 C CD a1co
.> bA Q +' H o - aJ
3 N H i V Q
0 ca H s c
c a, Y an . 1 ;+
a)
a1 a) o H X —
CA i i V ++ co a) C
C co ra co z — Q ++ Q
C
0 C - a
� —
a)
m Page 622 of 707 277

Open-ended Responses: ► Lots of cars, streets are for that purpose, they are big and busy to get over.
► Animals ► Need bright colored bike baths like Rancho ► Any paint lines on 9th street from Grove to has
campus are very faint and hard to see. The ► Need class 1 or class 2 lanes to connect north road itself is very bad and needs to be re- upland to trail in downtown paved.
► Need more bike lanes.North/south only Euclid.
► As a driver these are the issues I see for bikes Need bike lanes on Mountain and Benson plus ► Bike flashing lights more East/West streets.
► Bike should have barriers to separate from ► Need my kids to be safe in order to ride cars ► Need real bike lanes
► Bikes don't follow the rules ► Need to have traffic lights with turn signals ► Damaged sidewalks or streets. PLEASE
► Do not take traffic lanes away from motor ve- ► no designated bike lane. Streets have alot hicles to provide them for bicyclist. Motor ve- of tree roots coming up on the side of street. hicles will not be reduced even if more people Road bumps. ride bicycles. ► No enforcement at intersections on bike yrail ► Don't feel safe ► No safe way to lock up a bike at the Metrolink ► Don't feel safe due to where the bike path is. station for day trips My husband was almost accosted by a drug ► Not comfortable on busy streets, prefer side- addicted person on the trail. walks
► Don't have a bike ► Not enough emphasis on the use of the green ► Don't know how to ride bike paint on the street ► Drivers do not look for us bike riders crossing, ► Not enough protected bike paths. Need prop- I have to be extremely vigilant when cross- er bike lanes that have barriers from car traf- ing. We need the green lanes and SIGNAGE, fic.
please, like I see in Claremont. ► Only some section of the bike lanes army ► Drivers not stopping at marked bike crossings keep clean by the Pacific Trail or driving through even when bike are going ► Parked Cars often block bike lanes through on the bike path. Specifically those
near downtown on 3rd, 2nd and 1st streets. • People purposely drive on the bike lane when ► to find place to park!! Im on the bike lane and no cars in sight. Pea- hardple drive too close to the bike lane.
► Hill ► Poor roads (same as in the car)
► Hills,things are far ► Pot holes
► Homeless and drug use on the trail ► pot holes in bike lanes and homeless people ► Homeless on bike trails on the bike trail
► Homeless on the bike paths ► Potholes
u ► homeless on the bike trail ► Road are terrible o ► homeless people and illegal food vendors ev- ► Road diet please! San Antonio and every odd � erywhere. SHUT THAT DOWN!!! street!
z ► Homeless population and trash along streets ► Roads are a mess L and trails ► Roads are not maintained. _o ► How the heck am I at 70 years old to get gro-
Y_ ceries by bike...this is a crazy ideal11111i Roads are unsafe potholes uneven and dan a) gerous
► I am a senior citizen and no longer ride a bike. ► See less fortunate people 0 2 ► I feel unsafe on the pacific electric trail ► Some corners are blind. ► I most bike on pacific electric bike path and so Streets► are cracked and bumpy 16 my comments were made above
o ► Streets are for cars not bikes
2 ► I use to ride the bike trial but I always got a flat o tire while riding it ► Suspicious people on bike paths O ► I'm too old for the hills ► The bike lanes are rarely swept and I have Q
had glass cut my tires multiple times.
► Kids on electric bikes using streets/sidewalks
as playgrounds terrorizing people.
278 Page 623 of 707

► The bus service does not cover upland as it used to
► The Pike lands are filled with parked cars meeting you have to do is go around those cars and now we're going into the flow of traffic if you go on the sidewalk which I feel much safer it's like not like bik- ing because there's so many on even say, blocks bombs, cracks and people get upset when you're on the sidewalk they want you to go out onto the street to get kill ► The portion of Foothill Blvd. near the old Buffalo Inn has no shoulder for bicycles and is especially dangerous at night.
► Too hilly to bike leisurely
► Too hilly/steep climb in elevation
► Too short to touch the pedal
► Transients
► Trash day makes riding in the street less safe
► Two non ADA signal call buttons at two different crossings ► Uphill incline
► With my relative I have been on the trail on e-bikes to go to Claremont, I was a bit scared be of the drug ravaged people who live in there. Luckily we weren't attacked.

Figure A-22: Survey Question #10
Places that I frequently travel to in Upland are too far to get to by bike. 100%
90%
80%
70% 64%
60%
50%
40% 36%
30%
20%
10%
0% —
True False
x
c
a)
a
a