Agenda packet — Wildomar City Council, December 9, 2024 (part 10 of 22)

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
61 November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077

4.3 Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types
The City encompasses the foothills of the Santa Margarita Mountains and Elsinore Mountains and is located in the southwestern corner of Riverside County. Murrieta Creek flows through the western portion of the City, running north–south. The City is predominately developed; however, it does contain some additional land cover types and vegetation communities. Land cover types are primarily those that are not defined by a specific species of vegetation according to the CNPS.

The CNDDB database was reviewed to determine the general vegetation communities that occur within the City. Table 4 lists the general vegetation communities (collapsed and uncollapsed) and other land cover types within the City. Vegetation communities and land cover types according to the MSHCP are shown in Figure 4. It is important to note that the vegetation communities and land cover type descriptions that follow are according to broad community descriptions provided in the MSHCP. These descriptions are not representative of detailed vegetation communities within the City. Rather, they are generalized descriptions for the collapsed vegetation community/land cover type.

Table 4. Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types
Vegetation Community/Land Cover
Type – Collapsed
Vegetation Community/Land Cover
Type – Uncollapsed
Agricultural Land
Dairy and Livestock Feedyards
Field Croplands
Grove/Orchard
Chaparral
Chamise Chaparral
Chaparral
Red Shank Chaparral
Semi-Desert
Coastal Sage Scrub
Coastal Scrub
Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub
Riversidean Sage Scrub
Grassland
Nonnative Grassland
Valley and Foothill Grassland
Meadows and Marshes
Meadow (Montane)
Wet Montane Meadow
Coastal and Valley Freshwater Marsh
Marsh
1238
Biological Resources Assessment
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
62 November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
Table 4. Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types
Vegetation Community/Land Cover
Type – Collapsed
Vegetation Community/Land Cover
Type – Uncollapsed
Riparian Scrub, Woodland, Forest
Arundo/Riparian Forest
Montane Riparian Forest
Montane Riparian Scrub
Mulefat Scrub
Riparian Forest
Riparian Scrub
Southern Cottonwood/Willow Riparian
Southern Sycamore/Alder Riparian Woodland
Southern Willow Scrub
Tamarisk Scrub
Water Open Water/Reservoir/Pond
Woodland and Forests
Black Oak Forest
Broadleaved Upland Forest
Coast Live Oak Woodland
Oak Woodland
Peninsular Juniper Woodland and Scrub
Developed/Disturbed Residential/Urban/Exotic

4.3.1 Agricultural Land
Agricultural areas consist of any areas of the City that are under active cultivation, either irrigated or not.

Areas mapped as agriculture include crop fields and orchards, dairy and livestock feedyards, field croplands, groves, and orchards.

4.3.2 Chaparral
This vegetation community is primarily shrub-dominated with evergreen species that range from 1 to 4 meters in height. Common shrubs associated with this general community include chamise (Adenostoma fasciculatum), manzanita (Arctostaphylos spp.), wild lilac (Ceanothus spp.), oak (Quercus sp.), redberry (Rhamnus sp.), laurel sumac (Malosma laurina), mountain mahogany (Cercocarpus betuloides), toyon (Heteromeles arbutifolia), mission manzanita (Xylococcus bicolor), California buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum), sages (Salvia spp.), California sagebrush (Artemisia californica), and monkeyflower (Mimulus sp.). Herbaceous species are also common such as deerweed (Acmispon glaber), nightshade (Solanum sp.), Spanish bayonet (Yucca baccata), rock-rose (Cistus sp.), onion (Allium sp.), bunch grasses (Festuca spp.), wild cucumber (Marah sp.), bedstraw (Galium sp.), and lupine (Lupinus sp.). 1239
0 750
I Sca le i n F e et
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11
12 13 14 15
ECORP: N:\2022\2022-077 Wildomar General Plan Update\MAPS\Vegetation_and_LandCover\WildomarGP_Vegetation.mxd (TR)-trotellini 10/13/2023 Service Layer Credits: (c) OpenStreetMap and contributors, Creative Commons-Share Alike License (CCBY-SA) Map Features
Wildomar City Limits
Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types
Agriculture Mapping Unit
Brittlebush - California Buckwheat Mapping Unit
Brittlebush - California Sagebrush Association
California Annual Grassland Alliance
California Buckwheat Alliance
California Sagebrush - California Buckwheat - (Black Sage - Yellow Bush Penstemon) Mapping Unit
Chamise - Coastal Sage Scrub Disturbance Mapping Unit
Chamise - Hoaryleaf Ceanothus - Black Sage Association
Chamise - Hoaryleaf Ceanothus Alliance
Deerweed Alliance
Eucalyptus Alliance
Exotic Trees Mapping Unit
Urban Interface Mapping Unit
Urban or development Mapping Unit
Vacant (disturbed bare ground, <2% vegetative cover) Mapping Unit
White Sage - Brittlebush Association
Willow Mapping Unit
Figure 4. Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types
Sheet 1 of 15
Map Date: 10/13/2023
Sources: NAIP (2020), Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Vegetation (2012 CNPS) 2022-077 City of Wildomar GP Update 1240
0 750
I Sca le i n F e et
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11
12 13 14 15
ECORP: N:\2022\2022-077 Wildomar General Plan Update\MAPS\Vegetation_and_LandCover\WildomarGP_Vegetation.mxd (TR)-trotellini 10/13/2023 Service Layer Credits: (c) OpenStreetMap and contributors, Creative Commons-Share Alike License (CCBY-SA) Map Features
Wildomar City Limits
Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types
Brittlebush - California Buckwheat Mapping Unit
Brittlebush - California Sagebrush Association
California Annual Grassland Alliance
California Buckwheat Alliance
California Sagebrush - California Buckwheat - (Black Sage - Yellow Bush Penstemon) Mapping Unit
California Sagebrush - White Sage Alliance
Chamise - Black Sage Alliance
Chamise - Coastal Sage Scrub Disturbance Mapping Unit
Chamise - Hoaryleaf Ceanothus - Black Sage Association
Chamise - Hoaryleaf Ceanothus Alliance
Chamise Pure Association
Coast Live Oak / Chaparral Association
Coast Live Oak Alliance
Exotic Trees Mapping Unit
Urban Interface Mapping Unit
Urban or development Mapping Unit
Vacant (disturbed bare ground, <2% vegetative cover) Mapping Unit
White Sage - Brittlebush Association
Willow Mapping Unit
Figure 4. Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types
Sheet 2 of 15
Map Date: 10/13/2023
Sources: NAIP (2020), Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Vegetation (2012 CNPS) 2022-077 City of Wildomar GP Update 1241
0 750
I Sca le i n F e et
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11
12 13 14 15
ECORP: N:\2022\2022-077 Wildomar General Plan Update\MAPS\Vegetation_and_LandCover\WildomarGP_Vegetation.mxd (TR)-trotellini 10/13/2023 Service Layer Credits: (c) OpenStreetMap and contributors, Creative Commons-Share Alike License (CCBY-SA) Map Features
Wildomar City Limits
Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types
Brittlebush - California Buckwheat Mapping Unit
Brittlebush - California Sagebrush Association
California Annual Grassland Alliance
California Buckwheat Alliance
California Sagebrush - California Buckwheat - (Black Sage - Yellow Bush Penstemon) Mapping Unit
California Sycamore Alliance
Chamise - Black Sage Alliance
Chamise - California Buckwheat Association
Chamise - Coastal Sage Scrub Disturbance Mapping Unit
Chamise - Hoaryleaf Ceanothus - Black Sage Association
Chamise Alliance
Chamise Pure Association
Coast Live Oak / Chaparral Association
Coast Live Oak / Poison Oak Riparian Association
Coast Live Oak Alliance
Eucalyptus Alliance
Fremont Cottonwood - Willow Mapping Unit
Urban Interface Mapping Unit
Urban or development Mapping Unit
Vacant (disturbed bare ground, <2% vegetative cover) Mapping Unit
Water Mapping Unit
Willow Mapping Unit
Figure 4. Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types
Sheet 3 of 15
Map Date: 10/13/2023
Sources: NAIP (2020), Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Vegetation (2012 CNPS) 2022-077 City of Wildomar GP Update 1242
0 750
I Sca le i n F e et
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11
12 13 14 15
ECORP: N:\2022\2022-077 Wildomar General Plan Update\MAPS\Vegetation_and_LandCover\WildomarGP_Vegetation.mxd (TR)-trotellini 10/13/2023 Service Layer Credits: (c) OpenStreetMap and contributors, Creative Commons-Share Alike License (CCBY-SA) Map Features
Wildomar City Limits
Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types
Agriculture Mapping Unit
Urban Interface Mapping Unit
Urban or development Mapping Unit
Figure 4. Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types
Sheet 4 of 15
Map Date: 10/13/2023
Sources: NAIP (2020), Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Vegetation (2012 CNPS) 2022-077 City of Wildomar GP Update 1243
0 750
I Sca le i n F e et
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11
12 13 14 15
ECORP: N:\2022\2022-077 Wildomar General Plan Update\MAPS\Vegetation_and_LandCover\WildomarGP_Vegetation.mxd (TR)-trotellini 10/13/2023 Service Layer Credits: (c) OpenStreetMap and contributors, Creative Commons-Share Alike License (CCBY-SA) Map Features
Wildomar City Limits
Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types
Agriculture Mapping Unit
Brittlebush - California Buckwheat Mapping Unit
California Buckwheat Alliance
California Sagebrush - (California Buckwheat) - Annual GrassHerb Mapping Unit Chamise - Coastal Sage Scrub Disturbance Mapping Unit
Chamise - Hoaryleaf Ceanothus - Black Sage Association
Chamise - Hoaryleaf Ceanothus Alliance
Coast Live Oak Alliance
Exotic Trees Mapping Unit
Fremont Cottonwood - Willow Mapping Unit
Urban Interface Mapping Unit
Urban or development Mapping Unit
Vacant (disturbed bare ground, <2% vegetative cover) Mapping Unit
Figure 4. Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types
Sheet 5 of 15
Map Date: 10/13/2023
Sources: NAIP (2020), Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Vegetation (2012 CNPS) 2022-077 City of Wildomar GP Update 1244
0 750
I Sca le i n F e et
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11
12 13 14 15
ECORP: N:\2022\2022-077 Wildomar General Plan Update\MAPS\Vegetation_and_LandCover\WildomarGP_Vegetation.mxd (TR)-trotellini 10/13/2023 Service Layer Credits: (c) OpenStreetMap and contributors, Creative Commons-Share Alike License (CCBY-SA) Map Features
Wildomar City Limits
Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types
Agriculture Mapping Unit
Brittlebush - California Buckwheat Mapping Unit
Brittlebush - California Sagebrush Association
California Annual Grassland Alliance
California Buckwheat - Brittlebush Alliance
California Buckwheat Alliance
California Sycamore Alliance
Chamise - Black Sage Alliance
Chamise - California Buckwheat Association
Chamise - Coastal Sage Scrub Disturbance Mapping Unit
Chamise - Hoaryleaf Ceanothus - Black Sage Association
Chamise - Hoaryleaf Ceanothus Alliance
Chamise - Laurel Sumac Association
Chamise Pure Association
Coast Live Oak - Sycamore Riparian Mapping Unit
Coast Live Oak / Chaparral Association
Coast Live Oak Alliance
Eucalyptus Alliance
Exotic Trees Mapping Unit
Hoaryleaf Ceanothus Alliance
Laurel Sumac - California Buckwheat Association
Urban Interface Mapping Unit
Urban or development Mapping Unit
Vacant (disturbed bare ground, <2% vegetative cover) Mapping Unit
Water Mapping Unit
Willow Mapping Unit
Figure 4. Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types
Sheet 6 of 15
Map Date: 10/13/2023
Sources: NAIP (2020), Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Vegetation (2012 CNPS) 2022-077 City of Wildomar GP Update 1245
0 750
I Sca le i n F e et
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11
12 13 14 15
ECORP: N:\2022\2022-077 Wildomar General Plan Update\MAPS\Vegetation_and_LandCover\WildomarGP_Vegetation.mxd (TR)-trotellini 10/13/2023 Service Layer Credits: (c) OpenStreetMap and contributors, Creative Commons-Share Alike License (CCBY-SA) Map Features
Wildomar City Limits
Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types
California Annual Grassland Alliance
California Buckwheat - White Sage - (California Sagebrush) Mapping Unit
California Buckwheat Alliance
California Sagebrush - California Buckwheat - Laurel Sumac Association
Chamise - Black Sage Alliance
Chamise - Coastal Sage Scrub Disturbance Mapping Unit
Chamise - Hoaryleaf Ceanothus - Black Sage Association
Chamise - Laurel Sumac Association
Chamise Pure Association
Coast Live Oak - Sycamore Riparian Mapping Unit
Coast Live Oak / Chaparral Association
Coast Live Oak Alliance
Eucalyptus Alliance
Laurel Sumac Alliance
Urban Interface Mapping Unit
Urban or development Mapping Unit
Water Mapping Unit
Willow Mapping Unit
Figure 4. Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types
Sheet 7 of 15
Map Date: 10/13/2023
Sources: NAIP (2020), Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Vegetation (2012 CNPS) 2022-077 City of Wildomar GP Update 1246
0 750
I Sca le i n F e et
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11
12 13 14 15
ECORP: N:\2022\2022-077 Wildomar General Plan Update\MAPS\Vegetation_and_LandCover\WildomarGP_Vegetation.mxd (TR)-trotellini 10/13/2023 Service Layer Credits: (c) OpenStreetMap and contributors, Creative Commons-Share Alike License (CCBY-SA) Map Features
Wildomar City Limits
Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types
Agriculture Mapping Unit
Brittlebush - California Buckwheat Mapping Unit
California Annual Grassland Alliance
California Buckwheat Alliance
California Chaparral Mapping Unit
Chamise - Black Sage Alliance
Chamise - California Buckwheat Association
Chamise - Coastal Sage Scrub Disturbance Mapping Unit
Chamise - Hoaryleaf Ceanothus Alliance
Chamise - Laurel Sumac Association
Coast Live Oak - Sycamore Riparian Mapping Unit
Coast Live Oak Alliance
Deerweed Alliance
Laurel Sumac - California Buckwheat Association
Unmapped Area
Urban Interface Mapping Unit
Urban or development Mapping Unit
Figure 4. Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types
Sheet 8 of 15
Map Date: 10/13/2023
Sources: NAIP (2020), Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Vegetation (2012 CNPS) 2022-077 City of Wildomar GP Update 1247
0 750
I Sca le i n F e et
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11
12 13 14 15
ECORP: N:\2022\2022-077 Wildomar General Plan Update\MAPS\Vegetation_and_LandCover\WildomarGP_Vegetation.mxd (TR)-trotellini 10/13/2023 Service Layer Credits: (c) OpenStreetMap and contributors, Creative Commons-Share Alike License (CCBY-SA) Map Features
Wildomar City Limits
Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types
Agriculture Mapping Unit
Brittlebush - California Buckwheat Mapping Unit
California Annual Grassland Alliance
California Buckwheat Alliance
Chamise - California Buckwheat Association
Chamise - Coastal Sage Scrub Disturbance Mapping Unit
Chamise - Hoaryleaf Ceanothus Alliance
Eucalyptus Alliance
Exotic Trees Mapping Unit
Urban Interface Mapping Unit
Urban or development Mapping Unit
Willow Mapping Unit
Figure 4. Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types
Sheet 9 of 15
Map Date: 10/13/2023
Sources: NAIP (2020), Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Vegetation (2012 CNPS) 2022-077 City of Wildomar GP Update 1248
0 750
I Sca le i n F e et
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11
12 13 14 15
ECORP: N:\2022\2022-077 Wildomar General Plan Update\MAPS\Vegetation_and_LandCover\WildomarGP_Vegetation.mxd (TR)-trotellini 10/13/2023 Service Layer Credits: (c) OpenStreetMap and contributors, Creative Commons-Share Alike License (CCBY-SA) Map Features
Wildomar City Limits
Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types
Agriculture Mapping Unit
Blue Elderberry - (Mulefat) Mapping Unit
Brittlebush - California Buckwheat Mapping Unit
California Annual Grassland Alliance
California Buckwheat - Brittlebush Alliance
California Buckwheat Alliance
California Sagebrush - (California Buckwheat) - Annual GrassHerb Mapping Unit Chamise - Coastal Sage Scrub Disturbance Mapping Unit
Chamise - Hoaryleaf Ceanothus - Black Sage Association
Chamise - Laurel Sumac Association
Chamise Alliance
Coast Live Oak - Sycamore Riparian Mapping Unit
Coast Live Oak / Chaparral Association
Coast Live Oak Alliance
Eucalyptus Alliance
Exotic Trees Mapping Unit
Fremont Cottonwood - Willow Mapping Unit
Hoaryleaf Ceanothus Alliance
Laurel Sumac - California Buckwheat Association
Red Willow Alliance
Urban Interface Mapping Unit
Urban or development Mapping Unit
Vacant (disturbed bare ground, <2% vegetative cover) Mapping Unit
Willow Mapping Unit
Figure 4. Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types
Sheet 10 of 15
Map Date: 10/13/2023
Sources: NAIP (2020), Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Vegetation (2012 CNPS) 2022-077 City of Wildomar GP Update 1249
0 750
I Sca le i n F e et
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11
12 13 14 15
ECORP: N:\2022\2022-077 Wildomar General Plan Update\MAPS\Vegetation_and_LandCover\WildomarGP_Vegetation.mxd (TR)-trotellini 10/13/2023 Service Layer Credits: (c) OpenStreetMap and contributors, Creative Commons-Share Alike License (CCBY-SA) Map Features
Wildomar City Limits
Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types
Agriculture Mapping Unit
California Annual Grassland Alliance
California Buckwheat - Brittlebush Alliance
California Buckwheat Alliance
Chamise - Black Sage Alliance
Chamise - California Buckwheat Association
Chamise - Coastal Sage Scrub Disturbance Mapping Unit
Chamise - Hoaryleaf Ceanothus - Black Sage Association
Chamise - Laurel Sumac Association
Coast Live Oak - Sycamore Riparian Mapping Unit
Coast Live Oak / Chaparral Association
Coast Live Oak / Poison Oak Riparian Association
Coast Live Oak Alliance
Exotic Trees Mapping Unit
Hoaryleaf Ceanothus - Laurel Sumac Association
Laurel Sumac - California Buckwheat Association
Urban Interface Mapping Unit
Urban or development Mapping Unit
Willow Mapping Unit
Figure 4. Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types
Sheet 11 of 15
Map Date: 10/13/2023
Sources: NAIP (2020), Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Vegetation (2012 CNPS) 2022-077 City of Wildomar GP Update 1250
0 750
I Sca le i n F e et
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11
12 13 14 15
ECORP: N:\2022\2022-077 Wildomar General Plan Update\MAPS\Vegetation_and_LandCover\WildomarGP_Vegetation.mxd (TR)-trotellini 10/13/2023 Service Layer Credits: (c) OpenStreetMap and contributors, Creative Commons-Share Alike License (CCBY-SA) Map Features
Wildomar City Limits
Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types
Agriculture Mapping Unit
Brittlebush - California Buckwheat Mapping Unit
California Annual Grassland Alliance
Chamise - California Buckwheat Association
Chamise - Coastal Sage Scrub Disturbance Mapping Unit
Chamise - Hoaryleaf Ceanothus - Black Sage Association
Chamise - Hoaryleaf Ceanothus Alliance
Chamise - Laurel Sumac Association
Coast Live Oak - Sycamore Riparian Mapping Unit
Hoaryleaf Ceanothus - Laurel Sumac Association
Laurel Sumac - California Buckwheat Association
Scrub Oak - Southern Mixed Chaparral Association
Urban or development Mapping Unit
Willow Mapping Unit
Figure 4. Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types
Sheet 12 of 15
Map Date: 10/13/2023
Sources: NAIP (2020), Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Vegetation (2012 CNPS) 2022-077 City of Wildomar GP Update 1251
0 750
I Sca le i n F e et
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11
12 13 14 15
ECORP: N:\2022\2022-077 Wildomar General Plan Update\MAPS\Vegetation_and_LandCover\WildomarGP_Vegetation.mxd (TR)-trotellini 10/13/2023 Service Layer Credits: (c) OpenStreetMap and contributors, Creative Commons-Share Alike License (CCBY-SA) Map Features
Wildomar City Limits
Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types
Agriculture Mapping Unit
Brittlebush - California Buckwheat Mapping Unit
California Buckwheat Alliance
California Sagebrush - (California Buckwheat) - Annual GrassHerb Mapping Unit Chamise - Black Sage Alliance
Chamise - California Buckwheat Association
Chamise - Coastal Sage Scrub Disturbance Mapping Unit
Chamise - Hoaryleaf Ceanothus Alliance
Chamise - Laurel Sumac Association
Coast Live Oak - Sycamore Riparian Mapping Unit
Coast Live Oak / Chaparral Association
Coast Live Oak Alliance
Laurel Sumac - California Buckwheat - White Sage Association Laurel Sumac - California Buckwheat Association
Red Willow Alliance
Scrub Oak - Southern Mixed Chaparral Association
Urban Interface Mapping Unit
Urban or development Mapping Unit
Willow Mapping Unit
Figure 4. Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types
Sheet 13 of 15
Map Date: 10/13/2023
Sources: NAIP (2020), Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Vegetation (2012 CNPS) 2022-077 City of Wildomar GP Update 1252
0 750
I Sca le i n F e et
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11
12 13 14 15
ECORP: N:\2022\2022-077 Wildomar General Plan Update\MAPS\Vegetation_and_LandCover\WildomarGP_Vegetation.mxd (TR)-trotellini 10/13/2023 Service Layer Credits: (c) OpenStreetMap and contributors, Creative Commons-Share Alike License (CCBY-SA) Map Features
Wildomar City Limits
Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types
Agriculture Mapping Unit
Annual Herbaceous Grasslands and Forbs Mapping Unit
Bulrush - Cattail Mapping Unit
California Annual Grassland Alliance
California Buckwheat Alliance
California Sagebrush - (California Buckwheat) - Annual GrassHerb Mapping Unit California Sagebrush - California Buckwheat - White Sage Association
Chamise - Black Sage Alliance
Chamise - Coastal Sage Scrub Disturbance Mapping Unit
Chamise Pure Association
Coast Live Oak - California Sycamore - Red Willow Association Coast Live Oak - Sycamore Riparian Mapping Unit
Coast Live Oak / Chaparral Association
Coast Live Oak / Poison Oak Riparian Association
Coast Live Oak Alliance
Eucalyptus Alliance
Exotic Trees Mapping Unit
Fremont Cottonwood - Red Willow / Arroyo Willow / Mulefat Association
Fremont Cottonwood - Willow Mapping Unit
Fremont Cottonwood Dry Mapping Unit
Red Willow Alliance
Scrub Oak - Chamise Alliance
Urban Interface Mapping Unit
Urban or development Mapping Unit
Vacant (disturbed bare ground, <2% vegetative cover) Mapping Unit
Willow Mapping Unit
Figure 4. Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types
Sheet 14 of 15
Map Date: 10/13/2023
Sources: NAIP (2020), Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Vegetation (2012 CNPS) 2022-077 City of Wildomar GP Update 1253
0 750
I Sca le i n F e et
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11
12 13 14 15
ECORP: N:\2022\2022-077 Wildomar General Plan Update\MAPS\Vegetation_and_LandCover\WildomarGP_Vegetation.mxd (TR)-trotellini 10/13/2023 Service Layer Credits: (c) OpenStreetMap and contributors, Creative Commons-Share Alike License (CCBY-SA) Map Features
Wildomar City Limits
Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types
Agriculture Mapping Unit
California Annual Grassland Alliance
California Buckwheat Alliance
Chamise - Coastal Sage Scrub Disturbance Mapping Unit
Coast Live Oak - Sycamore Riparian Mapping Unit
Coast Live Oak Alliance
Exotic Trees Mapping Unit
Urban Interface Mapping Unit
Urban or development Mapping Unit
Willow Mapping Unit
Figure 4. Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types
Sheet 15 of 15
Map Date: 10/13/2023
Sources: NAIP (2020), Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Vegetation (2012 CNPS) 2022-077 City of Wildomar GP Update 1254
Biological Resources Assessment
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
78 November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077

4.3.3 Coastal Sage Scrub
This vegetation community is often found in distributed within other vegetation communities such as grassland and chapparal and oak or riparian woodlands. This community is often dominated by droughtdeciduous shrub and subshrub species. Species commonly associated with this community include California sagebrush, California buckwheat, laurel sumac, sages, brittlebush (Encelia farinosa), lemonade berry (Rhus integrifolia), boxthorn (Lycium sp.), and sugarbush (Rhus ovata).

4.3.4 Grassland
This vegetation community can consist of two general types of grasslands: non-native dominated grassland dominated by annual grasses and native grassland dominated by perennial grass species. The latter is often referred to as Valley and Foothill Grassland while the former is referred to as Non-Native Grassland.

Within Valley and Foothill Grassland, common species include fiddleneck (Amsinckia menziesii), common calyptridium (Calyptridium monospermum), suncup (Camissoniopsis sp.), Chinese houses (Collinsia heterophylla), California poppy (Eschscholzia californica), tarweed (Hemizonia sp.), coast goldfields (Lasthenia californica), common tidy-tips (Layia platyglossa), lupine (Lupinus sp.), wild hyacinth (Dichelostemma capitatum), and blue-eyed grass (Sisyrinchium bellum).

Within Non-Native Grassland, common species include slender oat (Avena barbata), wild oat (Avena fatua), fox tail chess (Bromus madritensis), soft chess (Bromus hordeaceus), ripgut grass (Bromus diandrus), barley (Hordeum sp.), rye grass (Lolium multiflorum), English ryegrass (Lolium perrene), rat-tail fescue (Vulpia myuros), and Mediterranean grass (Schismus barbatus). These species are often within landscapes that persist in disturbed areas.

4.3.5 Meadows and Marshes
These vegetation communities are associated with the presence of flowing or standing water. Common species included within these communities include cattails (Typha sp.), bulrush (Scirpus sp.), sedges (Carex sp.), spike rushes (Eleocharis sp.), flat sedges (Cyperus sp.), smartweed (Polygonum sp.), watercress (Nasturtium sp.), and yerba mansa (Anemopsis californica).

4.3.6 Riparian Scrub, Woodland, and Forest
These vegetation communities are often found within waterways and drainages. These communities often consist of one or more deciduous tree species with a variety of shrubs and herbs in the understory.

Common tree species within this community include box elder (Acer negundo), big-leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum), coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia), white alder (Alnus rhombifolia), sycamore (Platanus racemosa), Fremont’s cottonwood (Populus fremontii), California walnut (Juglans californica), blue elderberry (Sambucus mexicana), wild grape (Vitis girdiana), giant reed (Arundo donax), mulefat (Baccharis salicifolia), tamarisk (Tamarix sp.), and willows (Salix sp.). Within the understory, species such as salt grass (Distichlis spicata), wild cucumber (Marah macrocarpus), mugwort (Artemisia douglasiana), stinging nettle (Urtica dioica), and poison oak (Toxicodendron diversilobum) may be present. 1255
Biological Resources Assessment
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
79 November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077

4.3.7 Water
Open water is typically unvegetated, however, it may have algae and some floating plant species such as duckweed (Lemna sp.), and mosquito fern (Azolla filiculoides). Open water included inland depressions, lakes, ponds, reservoirs, stream channels, and other areas commonly present with riparian vegetation communities.

4.3.8 Woodland and Forests
These communities are often dominated by Englemann oak (Quercus engelmannii), coast live oak, canyon live oak (Quercus chrysolepis), interior live oak (Quercus wislizeni), and black oak (Quercus kelloggii) in a canopy that is intermittent to continuous. Other tree species that may be present include pinyon (Pinus sp.) and California juniper (Juniperus californica). The understory can often contain species such as wild blackberry (Rubus sp.), snowberry (Symphoricarpos sp.), California walnut, California lilac (Ceanothus sp.), currant (Ribes sp.), toyon (Heteromeles arbutifolia), California bay (Umbellularia californica), manzanita (Arctostaphylos sp.), laurel sumac, poison oak, and herbaceous plants such as miner’s lettuce (Claytonia perfoliata). These communities often occur along canyon bottoms and stream sides.

4.3.9 Developed/Disturbed
Developed/disturbed areas include forms of human development that have an impact on native communities, in some cases permanent impacts that cause a complete loss or conversion of native communities. Developed areas include buildings (residential and commercial) and other infrastructures, some smaller landscaped areas, roads, and paved areas. Paved parking areas, and driveways are included in the developed category. Retention basins associated with development are also included in this category. Many developed and disturbed areas contain non-native species and/or ornamental species.

Areas devoid or mostly devoid of vegetation and containing no buildings or other development were classified as disturbed. The disturbed designation indicates a location that may be actively maintained to be free of vegetation or that has been compacted to such a degree that vegetation is very sparse.

Disturbed areas include areas that include dirt roads, off-highway vehicle use, bare soils, concrete, and flood control measures.

4.4 Aquatic Resources
Wetlands and waters, as well as vegetation communities associated with these features (e.g., riparian vegetation), may occur throughout the City and will commonly be associated with streambeds, drainages, and channels (i.e., Murrieta Creek). Features identified in the NWI can be seen in Figure 5. Riverine, Freshwater Ponds, Freshwater Emergent Wetlands, and Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland features are documented in NWI. These features have the potential to provide corridors that encourage the movement of wildlife and provide habitat for sensitive wildlife and plant species.

An aquatic resources delineation was not conducted for this General Plan Update; however, listed below are general descriptions of types of aquatic resources that may be present. 1256
Biological Resources Assessment
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
80 November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077

4.4.1.1 Open Water
Open water communities may include large reservoirs, small ponds, and riverine habitats. A general description of these types of open water communities is provided below.

Reservoirs
Reservoirs are one type of open water feature that are often large natural areas or artificial lakes that provide a source of water supply. Reservoirs may also serve as recreational sites.

Ponds
Ponds are one type of lacustrine habitat that include areas of shallow open water, although areas of rooted freshwater marsh or floating plants may occur within this habitat. Ponds may be naturally occurring or artificial for stock and other uses.

Drainages
Drainages can include perennial or ephemeral resources such as creeks. These often will flow into larger water features such as a river, a watershed, or a reservoir. Artificial canals and irrigation ditches can also fall into this category. Drainages are typically associated with riparian habitat (described in Section 4.3.6) and may support areas of freshwater marsh.

4.4.1.2 Wetlands
Wetlands can be subclassified in a variety of ways. Three main categories of wetlands are described below:
freshwater marsh, wet meadow, and vernal pool.

Freshwater Marsh
Freshwater marsh often occurs along the margins of drainages and open water habitats. They are nontidal and are often continuously or frequently flooded. They often occur in nutrient-rich soils that are slow-draining and often saturated.

Wet Meadow
Wet meadow habitat often occurs at higher elevations in the eastern portion of the City. Dominant species in wet meadows include herbaceous wetland plants, such as sedges, rushes, spike rush, bent grass (Agrostis spp.), and oatgrass (Danthonia spp.). There are generally sparse or no shrubs or trees in wet meadows.
1257
0 750
I Sca le i n F e et
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11
12 13 14 15
ECORP: N:\2022\2022-077 Wildomar General Plan Update\MAPS\Hydro\WildomarGP_NWI.mxd (TR)-trotellini 10/13/2023 Service Layer Credits: (c) OpenStreetMap and contributors, Creative Commons-Share Alike License (CCBY-SA) Map Features
Wildomar City Limits
NWI Features
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
Freshwater Pond
Riverine
Figure 5. National Wetlands Inventory
Sheet 1 of 15
Map Date: 10/13/2023
Sources: NAIP (2020), NWI (2020)
2022-077 City of Wildomar GP Update 1258
0 750
I Sca le i n F e et
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11
12 13 14 15
ECORP: N:\2022\2022-077 Wildomar General Plan Update\MAPS\Hydro\WildomarGP_NWI.mxd (TR)-trotellini 10/13/2023 Service Layer Credits: (c) OpenStreetMap and contributors, Creative Commons-Share Alike License (CCBY-SA) Map Features
Wildomar City Limits
NWI Features
Freshwater Pond
Riverine
Figure 5. National Wetlands Inventory
Sheet 2 of 15
Map Date: 10/13/2023
Sources: NAIP (2020), NWI (2020)
2022-077 City of Wildomar GP Update 1259
0 750
I Sca le i n F e et
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11
12 13 14 15
ECORP: N:\2022\2022-077 Wildomar General Plan Update\MAPS\Hydro\WildomarGP_NWI.mxd (TR)-trotellini 10/13/2023 Service Layer Credits: (c) OpenStreetMap and contributors, Creative Commons-Share Alike License (CCBY-SA) Map Features
Wildomar City Limits
NWI Features
Riverine
Figure 5. National Wetlands Inventory
Sheet 3 of 15
Map Date: 10/13/2023
Sources: NAIP (2020), NWI (2020)
2022-077 City of Wildomar GP Update 1260
0 750
I Sca le i n F e et
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11
12 13 14 15
ECORP: N:\2022\2022-077 Wildomar General Plan Update\MAPS\Hydro\WildomarGP_NWI.mxd (TR)-trotellini 10/13/2023 Service Layer Credits: (c) OpenStreetMap and contributors, Creative Commons-Share Alike License (CCBY-SA) Map Features
Wildomar City Limits
NWI Features
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
Figure 5. National Wetlands Inventory
Sheet 4 of 15
Map Date: 10/13/2023
Sources: NAIP (2020), NWI (2020)
2022-077 City of Wildomar GP Update 1261
0 750
I Sca le i n F e et
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11
12 13 14 15
ECORP: N:\2022\2022-077 Wildomar General Plan Update\MAPS\Hydro\WildomarGP_NWI.mxd (TR)-trotellini 10/13/2023 Service Layer Credits: (c) OpenStreetMap and contributors, Creative Commons-Share Alike License (CCBY-SA) Map Features
Wildomar City Limits
NWI Features
Freshwater Emergent Wetland
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
Freshwater Pond
Riverine
Figure 5. National Wetlands Inventory
Sheet 5 of 15
Map Date: 10/13/2023
Sources: NAIP (2020), NWI (2020)
2022-077 City of Wildomar GP Update 1262
0 750
I Sca le i n F e et
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11
12 13 14 15
ECORP: N:\2022\2022-077 Wildomar General Plan Update\MAPS\Hydro\WildomarGP_NWI.mxd (TR)-trotellini 10/13/2023 Service Layer Credits: (c) OpenStreetMap and contributors, Creative Commons-Share Alike License (CCBY-SA) Map Features
Wildomar City Limits
NWI Features
Riverine
Figure 5. National Wetlands Inventory
Sheet 6 of 15
Map Date: 10/13/2023
Sources: NAIP (2020), NWI (2020)
2022-077 City of Wildomar GP Update 1263
0 750
I Sca le i n F e et
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11
12 13 14 15
ECORP: N:\2022\2022-077 Wildomar General Plan Update\MAPS\Hydro\WildomarGP_NWI.mxd (TR)-trotellini 10/13/2023 Service Layer Credits: (c) OpenStreetMap and contributors, Creative Commons-Share Alike License (CCBY-SA) Map Features
Wildomar City Limits
NWI Features
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
Riverine
Figure 5. National Wetlands Inventory
Sheet 7 of 15
Map Date: 10/13/2023
Sources: NAIP (2020), NWI (2020)
2022-077 City of Wildomar GP Update 1264
0 750
I Sca le i n F e et
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11
12 13 14 15
ECORP: N:\2022\2022-077 Wildomar General Plan Update\MAPS\Hydro\WildomarGP_NWI.mxd (TR)-trotellini 10/13/2023 Service Layer Credits: (c) OpenStreetMap and contributors, Creative Commons-Share Alike License (CCBY-SA) Map Features
Wildomar City Limits
NWI Features
Riverine
Figure 5. National Wetlands Inventory
Sheet 8 of 15
Map Date: 10/13/2023
Sources: NAIP (2020), NWI (2020)
2022-077 City of Wildomar GP Update 1265
0 750
I Sca le i n F e et
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11
12 13 14 15
ECORP: N:\2022\2022-077 Wildomar General Plan Update\MAPS\Hydro\WildomarGP_NWI.mxd (TR)-trotellini 10/13/2023 Service Layer Credits: (c) OpenStreetMap and contributors, Creative Commons-Share Alike License (CCBY-SA) Map Features
Wildomar City Limits
NWI Features
Freshwater Emergent Wetland
Freshwater Pond
Riverine
Figure 5. National Wetlands Inventory
Sheet 9 of 15
Map Date: 10/13/2023
Sources: NAIP (2020), NWI (2020)
2022-077 City of Wildomar GP Update 1266
0 750
I Sca le i n F e et
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11
12 13 14 15
ECORP: N:\2022\2022-077 Wildomar General Plan Update\MAPS\Hydro\WildomarGP_NWI.mxd (TR)-trotellini 10/13/2023 Service Layer Credits: (c) OpenStreetMap and contributors, Creative Commons-Share Alike License (CCBY-SA) Map Features
Wildomar City Limits
NWI Features
Freshwater Pond
Riverine
Figure 5. National Wetlands Inventory
Sheet 10 of 15
Map Date: 10/13/2023
Sources: NAIP (2020), NWI (2020)
2022-077 City of Wildomar GP Update 1267
0 750
I Sca le i n F e et
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11
12 13 14 15
ECORP: N:\2022\2022-077 Wildomar General Plan Update\MAPS\Hydro\WildomarGP_NWI.mxd (TR)-trotellini 10/13/2023 Service Layer Credits: (c) OpenStreetMap and contributors, Creative Commons-Share Alike License (CCBY-SA) Map Features
Wildomar City Limits
NWI Features
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
Freshwater Pond
Riverine
Figure 5. National Wetlands Inventory
Sheet 11 of 15
Map Date: 10/13/2023
Sources: NAIP (2020), NWI (2020)
2022-077 City of Wildomar GP Update 1268
0 750
I Sca le i n F e et
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11
12 13 14 15
ECORP: N:\2022\2022-077 Wildomar General Plan Update\MAPS\Hydro\WildomarGP_NWI.mxd (TR)-trotellini 10/13/2023 Service Layer Credits: (c) OpenStreetMap and contributors, Creative Commons-Share Alike License (CCBY-SA) Map Features
Wildomar City Limits
NWI Features
Riverine
Figure 5. National Wetlands Inventory
Sheet 12 of 15
Map Date: 10/13/2023
Sources: NAIP (2020), NWI (2020)
2022-077 City of Wildomar GP Update 1269
0 750
I Sca le i n F e et
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11
12 13 14 15
ECORP: N:\2022\2022-077 Wildomar General Plan Update\MAPS\Hydro\WildomarGP_NWI.mxd (TR)-trotellini 10/13/2023 Service Layer Credits: (c) OpenStreetMap and contributors, Creative Commons-Share Alike License (CCBY-SA) Map Features
Wildomar City Limits
NWI Features
Freshwater Emergent Wetland
Freshwater Pond
Riverine
Figure 5. National Wetlands Inventory
Sheet 13 of 15
Map Date: 10/13/2023
Sources: NAIP (2020), NWI (2020)
2022-077 City of Wildomar GP Update 1270
0 750
I Sca le i n F e et
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11
12 13 14 15
ECORP: N:\2022\2022-077 Wildomar General Plan Update\MAPS\Hydro\WildomarGP_NWI.mxd (TR)-trotellini 10/13/2023 Service Layer Credits: (c) OpenStreetMap and contributors, Creative Commons-Share Alike License (CCBY-SA) Map Features
Wildomar City Limits
NWI Features
Freshwater Emergent Wetland
Freshwater Pond
Riverine
Figure 5. National Wetlands Inventory
Sheet 14 of 15
Map Date: 10/13/2023
Sources: NAIP (2020), NWI (2020)
2022-077 City of Wildomar GP Update 1271
0 750
I Sca le i n F e et
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11
12 13 14 15
ECORP: N:\2022\2022-077 Wildomar General Plan Update\MAPS\Hydro\WildomarGP_NWI.mxd (TR)-trotellini 10/13/2023 Service Layer Credits: (c) OpenStreetMap and contributors, Creative Commons-Share Alike License (CCBY-SA) Map Features
Wildomar City Limits
NWI Features
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
Freshwater Pond
Riverine
Figure 5. National Wetlands Inventory
Sheet 15 of 15
Map Date: 10/13/2023
Sources: NAIP (2020), NWI (2020)
2022-077 City of Wildomar GP Update 1272
Biological Resources Assessment
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
96 November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
Vernal Pool
Vernal pools are seasonal depressional wetlands that are covered by shallow water throughout periods from winter to spring and then often dry completely by the summer and fall. This habitat can range in size from a small puddle to a shallow lake and they are often connected to drainages. Vernal pools are the home to fairy shrimp species including the endangered Riverside fairy shrimp (Streptocephalus woottoni) and other fairy shrimp species (Branchinecta sp.).

4.5 Special-Status Species Documented to Occur in the City For the purpose of this assessment, special-status biological resources are defined as:
 vegetation communities that are unique, or relatively limited distribution, or of particular value to wildlife;
 plant and animal species that have been designated as either rare, threatened, or endangered by CDFW or the USFWS, and are protected under either the federal or California ESAs;  plant and wildlife species that are considered Sensitive under the United States Forest Service (USFS);
 plant and wildlife species being considered or proposed for listing under the federal or California ESAs; and
 plant and wildlife species that are of expressed concern to resource and regulatory agencies or local jurisdictions.

Note: For the purposes of this report, special-status plant species with a CRPR of 3 or 4 were only included if they are included in the conservation criteria of the MSHCP and wildlife species that are watch list are only included if they are part of conservation criteria in the MSHCP.

4.5.1 Plants
Special-status plant species include those classified as endangered or threatened, proposed or candidate species for listing by the USFWS or CDFW, monitored by CNPS, and considered to be those of greatest conservation need.

A total of 36 special-status plant species were identified through the database searches. An additional four were recognized in the City’s Criteria Area Species Survey Areas. Results of the CNDDB, IPaC, and CNPS database searches are included as Appendix D. Table 5 summarizes the special-status plant species, associated habitats, designated critical habitat within the City, blooming period and elevation, and occurrence information.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
97 November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
can be protected from disturbances and is representative of the species’ geographical range and distribution. No critical habitat for plant species exists within the City.

Plant species listed under federal or California ESAs are discussed in more detail below. Table 5 lists all the special-status plant species (as defined in Section 2.2) that have been documented to occur within the City or may be potentially affected by activities in the City, as identified in the literature review. However, Table 5 should not be considered a complete list of special-status plant species that may occur within the City. Other species not identified in the literature review may occur in the City presently or in the future.

This table includes the listing status for each species, typical habitat requirements, typical blooming period across the species’ range in California, and general elevation range.

Munz’s onion (Allium munzii) is a federally listed endangered species, state-listed threatened species, CRPR 1B.1 species, and MSHCP covered species. It is a perennial bulbiferous herb that blooms from March through May. It can be found in a variety of habitats such as chaparral, cismontane woodland, coastal scrub, and valley and foothill grasslands. It is often found in clay or mesic microhabitats.

San Diego ambrosia (Ambrosia pumila) is a federally listed endangered species and CRPR 1B.1 species. It is a perennial rhizomatous herb that blooms April through October. It prefers sandy loam or clay soils and is often found in disturbed areas.

San Jacinto Valley crownscale (Atriplex coronata var. notatior) is a federally listed endangered species, CRPR 1B.1 species, and MSHCP covered species. It is an annual herb that blooms from April through August. It can be found in playas, vernal pools, and valley and foothill grasslands. It is often found in alkaline micro habitats.

Thread-leaved brodiaea (Brodiaea filifolia) is a federally threatened, state-endangered species, CRPR 1B.1 species, and MSHCP covered species. It is a perennial bulbiferous herb that produces several blue to redpurple flowers on a leafless stalk. The blooming period is March through June. Habitat is in vernal pools and wetlands, but it can also occur in non-wetlands. Urbanization is the most significant threat to the species.

Slender-horned spineflower (Dodecahema leptoceras) is a federally endangered, state endangered species, CRPR 1B.1 species, and MSHCP covered species. It is an annual herb that blooms April through June and is found in sandy soil within chaparral, cismontane woodland, and alluvial fan habitat.

San Diego button-celery (Eryngium aristulatum var. parishii) is a federally endangered, state-listed endangered species, CRPR 1B.1 species, and MSHCP covered species. It is an annual/perennial herb that blooms from April through June. It occurs in coastal scrub, vernal pools, and valley and foothill grasslands.

It often occurs in mesic microhabitats.

Parish’s meadowfoam (Limnanthes alba ssp. parishii) is a state-listed endangered species, CRPR 1B.2 species, and MSHCP covered species. It is an annual herb that blooms from April through June. It occurs in lower montane coniferous forests, meadows and seeps, and vernal pools. It often occurs in vernally mesic microhabitats.
1274
Biological Resources Assessment
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
98 November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
Spreading navarretia (Navarretia fossalis) is a federally listed threatened species, CRPR 1B.1 species, and MSHCP covered species. It is an annual herb that blooms from April through June. It occurs in a variety of habitats including chenopod scrub, shallow freshwater marshes and swamps, playas, and vernal pools.

California Orcutt grass (Orcuttia californica) is a federally listed endangered, state-listed endangered species, CRPR 1B.1 species, and MSHCP covered species. It is an annual herb that blooms from April through August. It occurs in vernal pools.

Table 5. Special-Status Plant Species Identified in the Literature Review Common and
Scientific
Name
Status*
Federal/State/

CRPR/USFS/MSHCP
Habitats Blooming
Period
Elevation
Range (feet)
Chaparral sandverbena
Abronia villosa var.
aurita
None/None/1B.1/S/None Occurs in chaparral, coastal
dune, and desert dunes.
(Jan) Mar–
Sep 245–5250
Yucaipa onion
Allium marvinii
None/None/1B.2/S/
Covered
Occurs in chaparral and
generally in clay soils and
openings.

Apr–May 2495–3495
Munz’s onion
Allium munzii
END/THR/1B.1/None/
Covered
Occurs in chaparral,
cismontane woodland, coastal
scrub, pinyon and juniper
woodland, and valley and
foothill grasslands.

Mar–May 975–3510
Alkali marsh aster
Almutaster
pauciflorus
None/None/2B.2/None/
Not Covered Occurs in meadows and seeps. Jun–Oct 785–2625 San Diego
ambrosia
Ambrosia pumila
END/None/1B.1/None/
Covered
Occurs in chaparral, coastal
scrub, valley and foothill
grassland, and vernal pools.

Apr–Oct 65–1360
Rainbow
manzanita
Arctostaphylos
rainbowensis
None/None/1B.1/S/
Covered Occurs in chaparral. Dec–Mar 675–2200
San Jacinto Valley
crownscale END/None/1B.1/None/
Covered
Occurs in playas, valley and
foothill grassland, and vernal
pools.

Apr–Aug 455–1640
1275
Biological Resources Assessment
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
99 November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
Table 5. Special-Status Plant Species Identified in the Literature Review Common and
Scientific
Name
Status*
Federal/State/

CRPR/USFS/MSHCP
Habitats Blooming
Period
Elevation
Range (feet)
Atriplex coronata
var. notatior
Parish’s
brittlescale
Atriplex parishii
None/None/1B.1/None/
Covered
Occurs in chenopod scrub,
playas, and vernal pools. Jun–Oct 80–6235
California ayenia
Ayenia compacta
None/None/2B.3/None/
Not Covered
Occurs in Mojavean and
Sonoran desert scrub. Mar–Apr 490–3595
Thread-leaved
brodiaea
Brodiaea filifolia
THR/END/1B.1/None/
Covered
Occurs in chaparral,
cismontane woodland, coastal
scrub, playas, valley and
foothill grasslands, and vernal
pools. Often found in clay
soils.

Mar–Jun 80–3675
Santa Rosa Basalt
brodiaea
Brodiaea
santarosae
None/None/1B.2/S/
Not Covered
Occurs in valley and foothill
grassland. May–Jun 1855–3430
Intermediate
mariposa-lily
Calochortus weedii
var. intermedius
None/None/1B.2/S/
Covered
Occurs in chaparral, coastal
scrub, and valley and foothill
grassland.

May–Jul 345–2805
Smooth tarplant
Centromadia
pungens ssp. laevis
None/None/1B.1/None/
Covered
Occurs in chenopod scrub,
meadows and seeps, playas,
riparian woodland, and valley
and foothill grassland.

Apr–Sep 0–2100
Parry’s spineflower
Chorizanthe parryi
var. parryi
None/None/1B.1/S/
Covered
Occurs in chaparral,
cismontane woodland, coastal
scrub, and valley and foothill
grassland.

Apr–Jun 900–4005
1276
Biological Resources Assessment
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
100 November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
Table 5. Special-Status Plant Species Identified in the Literature Review Common and
Scientific
Name
Status*
Federal/State/

CRPR/USFS/MSHCP
Habitats Blooming
Period
Elevation
Range (feet)
Long-spined
spineflower
Chorizanthe
polygonoides var.
longispina
None/None/1B.2/None/
Covered
Occurs in chaparral, coastal
scrub, meadows and seeps,
valley and foothill grassland,
and vernal pools.

Apr–Jul 100–5020
San Miguel savory
Clinopodium
chandleri
None/None/1B.2/S/
Covered
Occurs in chaparral,
cismontane woodland, coastal
scrub, riparian woodland, and
valley and foothill grassland.

Mar–Jul 395–3525
Slender-horned
spineflower
Dodecahema
leptoceras
END/END/1B.1/None/
Not Covered
Occurs in chaparral,
cismontane woodland, and
coastal scrub (alluvial fans).

Apr–Jun 655–2495
Many-stemmed
dudleya
Dudleya
multicaulis
None/None/1B.2/S/
Covered
Occurs in chaparral, coastal
scrub, and valley and foothill
grassland.

Apr–Jul 50–2590
San Diego buttoncelery
Eryngium
aristulatum var.
parishii
END/END/1B.1/None/
Covered
Occurs in coastal scrub, valley
and foothill grassland, and
vernal pools.

Apr–Jun 65–2035
Campbell’s
liverwort
Geothallus
tuberosus
None/None/1B.1/None/
Not Covered
Occurs in coastal scrub and
vernal pools. – 35–1970
Palmer’s
grapplinghook
Harpagonella
palmeri
None/None/4.2/None/
Covered
Occurs in chaparral, coastal
scrub, and valley and foothill
grassland.

Mar–May 65–3135
1277
Biological Resources Assessment
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
101 November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
Table 5. Special-Status Plant Species Identified in the Literature Review Common and
Scientific
Name
Status*
Federal/State/

CRPR/USFS/MSHCP
Habitats Blooming
Period
Elevation
Range (feet)
Tecate cypress
Hesperocyparis
forbesii
None/None/1B.1/S/
Not Covered
Occurs in closed-cone
coniferous forest and
chaparral.
– 360–4920
Santa Lucia dwarf
rush
Juncus luciensis
None/None/1B.2/S/
Not Covered
Occurs in chaparral, Great
Basin scrub, lower montane
coniferous forest, meadows
and seeps, and vernal pools.

Apr–Jul 985–6695
Coulter’s
goldfields
Lasthenia glabrata
ssp. coulteri
None/None/1B.1/None/
Covered
Occurs in marshes and
swamps, playas, and vernal
pools.

Feb–Jun 5–4005
Lemon lily
Lilium parryi
None/None/1B.2/S/
Covered
Occurs in lower and upper
montane coniferous forest,
meadows and seeps, and
riparian forest.

Jul–Aug 4005–9005
Parish’s
meadowfoam
Limnanthes alba
ssp. parishii
None/END/1B.2/S/
Covered
Occurs in lower montane
coniferous forest, meadows
and seeps, and vernal pools.

Apr–Jun 1970–6560
Intermediate
monardella
Monardella
hypoleuca ssp.
intermedia
None/None/1B.3/None/
Not Covered
Occurs in chaparral,
cismontane woodland, and
lower montane coniferous
forest.

Apr–Sep 1310–4100
Little mousetail
Myosurus minimus
ssp. apus
None/None/3.1/None/
Covered
Occurs in valley and foothill
grassland and vernal pools. Mar–Jun 65–2100
Spreading
navarretia
Navarretia fossalis
THR/None/1B.1/None/
Covered
Occurs in chenopod scrub,
marshes and swamps, playas,
and vernal pools.

Apr–Jun 100–2150
1278
Biological Resources Assessment
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
102 November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
Table 5. Special-Status Plant Species Identified in the Literature Review Common and
Scientific
Name
Status*
Federal/State/

CRPR/USFS/MSHCP
Habitats Blooming
Period
Elevation
Range (feet)
Prostrate vernal
pool navarretia
Navarretia
prostrata
None/None/1B.2/None/
Covered
Occurs in coastal scrub,
meadows and seeps, valley
and foothill grassland, and
vernal pools.

Apr–Jul 10–3970
California Orcutt
grass
Orcuttia californica
END/END/1B.1/None/
Covered Occurs in vernal pools. Apr–Aug 50–2165
White rabbittobacco
Pseudognaphaliu
m leucocephalum
None/None/2B.2/None/
Not Covered
Occurs in chaparral,
cismontane woodland, coastal
scrub, and riparian woodland.
(Jul) Aug–Nov
(Dec) 0–6890
Southern
mountains
skullcap
Scutellaria
bolanderi ssp.
austromontana
None/None/1B.2/S/
Not Covered
Occurs in chaparral,
cismontane woodland, and
lower montane coniferous
forest.

Jun–Aug 1395–6560
Hammitt’s claycress
Sibaropsis
hammittii
None/None/1B.2/S/
Covered
Occurs in chaparral openings
and valley and foothill
grasslands.

Mar–Apr 2360–3495
Bottle liverwort
Sphaerocarpos
drewiae
None/None/1B.1/None/
Not Covered
Occurs in chaparral and
coastal scrub. – 295–1970
San Bernardino
aster
Symphyotrichum
defoliatum
None/None/1B.2/S/
Not Covered
Occurs in cismontane
woodland, coastal scrub, lower
montane coniferous forest,
meadows and seeps, marshes
and swamps, and valley and
foothills grasslands.

Jul–Nov 5–6695
1279
Biological Resources Assessment
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
103 November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
Table 5. Special-Status Plant Species Identified in the Literature Review Common and
Scientific
Name
Status*
Federal/State/

CRPR/USFS/MSHCP
Habitats Blooming
Period
Elevation
Range (feet)
*Status Codes:

Federal
END = Listed as endangered under the federal Endangered Species Act THR = Listed as threatened under the federal Endangered Species Act CAN = Candidate for threatened or endangered status
None = No listing under the Federal Endangered Species Act State
END = Listed as endangered under the California Endangered Species Act THR = Listed as threatened under the California Endangered Species Act FP = Fully protected under the California Fish and Game Code SSC = Species of special concern in California
None = No listing under the California Endangered Species Act CNPS Rare Plant Rank (CRPR) Status Designations
1A = Plants Presumed Extirpated in California and Either Rare or Extinct Elsewhere 1B = Plants Rare, Threatened, or Endangered in California and Elsewhere 2A = Plants Presumed Extirpated in California, But Common Elsewhere 2B = Plants Rare, Threatened, or Endangered in California, But More Common Elsewhere 3 = Plants about which more information is needed; a review list 4 = Plants of limited distribution; a watch list
CRPR List .1, .2, and .3 Extension Meanings:
.1 = Seriously threatened in California (over 80 percent of occurrences threatened / high degree and immediacy of threat)
.2 = Moderately threatened in California (20 to 80 percent occurrences threatened / moderate degree and immediacy of threat)
.3 = Not very threatened in California (less than 20 percent of occurrences threatened/low degree and immediacy of threat or no current threats known)
United States Forest Service (USFS)
S = Listed as sensitive under the United States Forest Service None = No listing under the United States Forest Service Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Covered = Covered Species
Not Covered = Not covered species

4.5.2 Wildlife
Special-status wildlife species include those classified as endangered or threatened, proposed or candidate species for listing by the USFWS or CDFW, USFS Sensitive, or considered a CDFW fully protected species or SSC.

If a proposed project has the potential to adversely impact plants (e.g., a ground or vegetationdisturbing activity), determine if the proposed project occurs within a Section 6.1.3 Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Area (NEPSSA) and Section 6.3.2 Criteria Area Plant Species Survey Area (CAPSSA). If the proposed project is not located within a NEPSSA or CAPSSA, no further action is required. If a proposed project is located within a NEPSSA and/or CAPSSA, the project will comply with the MSHCP requirements.
1280
Biological Resources Assessment
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
104 November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
A total of 42 special-status wildlife species known to occur in the vicinity of the City were identified through the database review. Table 6 summarizes the special-status wildlife, associated habitats, and any designated critical habitat within the City.

The federal ESA establishes critical habitat as a means to contain essential features for threatened or endangered species. Critical habitat requires special management and protection. When designating critical habitat, areas are assessed for if the species occupies the area and if there is space for the individual or population to grow and exhibit normal behavior; the space provides shelter and food resources; the space is adequate for breeding and offspring rearing; and the space contains habitat that can be protected from disturbances and is representative of the species’ geographical range and distribution. Within the City, critical habitat for coastal California gnatcatcher exists (Figure 2B). Wildlife species listed or proposed for listing under the federal or California ESAs are discussed in more detail below.

Table 6 lists all the special-status wildlife species that have been documented to occur within the City or may be potentially affected by activities in the City, as identified in the literature review. However, Table 6 should not be considered a complete list of special-status wildlife species that may occur within the City.

Other species not identified in the literature review may occur in the City presently or in the future.

Included in this table are the listing status for each species and preferred habitats.  Crotch bumble bee (Bombus crotchii) is a candidate for state listing. This species occurs in open grassland and scrub habitats ranging from coastal California, east to the Sierra-Cascade crest, and south into Mexico. The flight period for queens in California is from late February to late October, peaking in early April with a second pulse in July. The flight period for workers and males in California is from late March through September, peaking in early July. The species prefers a diet consisting of certain plant species including milkweeds (Asclepias sp.), dusty maidens (Chaenactis sp.), lupines (Lupinus sp.), medics (Medicago sp.), phacelias (Phacelia sp.), sages (Salvia sp.), clarkias (Clarkia sp.), poppies (Papaver sp. or Eschscholzia sp.), and wild buckwheat (Eriogonum sp.).
 Vernal pool fairy shrimp (Branchinecta lynchi) is a federally threatened species and MSHCP covered species. This species is a small, freshwater crustacean found in vernal pools throughout California. They have slender bodies with 11 pairs of legs that function as gills and aid in swimming. They are opportunistic filter feeders. Females carry fertilized eggs in a sac on the underside of their body. Resting fairy shrimp eggs are known as cysts and can remain viable for multiple years within dry pools. The average lifespan is 91 days. They generally begin their lifecycle in November and complete their entire life cycle by early May; this depends on the presence of suitable water conditions within vernal pools.  San Diego fairy shrimp (Branchinecta sandiegonensis) is a federally endangered species and MSHCP covered species. This species is usually observed from January to March if seasonal rainfall creates vernal pools and initiates cysts hatching. This species has compound eyes similar to the vernal pool fairy shrimp. They are distinguished from other Branchinecta fairy shrimp by the shape of the second antenna in the males or the shape and length of the ventral ovisac in 1281
Biological Resources Assessment
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
105 November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
females. They are also distinguished by a pair of dorsolateral spines. Cysts hatch and mature within 7 to 14 days of vernal pools arising.
 Monarch butterfly- California overwintering population (Danaus plexippus pop. 1) is a federally candidate species. They are found primarily in prairies, meadows, grasslands, and along roadsides.

Adult butterflies drink nectar from a variety of flowers, however, milkweed is an essential food for growing larvae.
 Quino checkerspot butterfly (Euphydryas editha quino) is a federally endangered species and MSHCP covered species. Orange, black, and white arranged in a checkerboard pattern is characteristic of this species. It has a black body with orange antennae. This species requires specific host plants. Host plants include dwarf plantain (Plantago erecta), white snapdragon (Antirrhinum coluterianum), woolly plantain (Plantago patagonica), and Chinese houses (Collinsia concolor).
 Riverside fairy shrimp (Streptocephalus woottoni) is a federally endangered species and MSHCP covered species. They typically occur in vernal pools and other basins that hold water for sufficient periods (i.e., 7 to 8 weeks) to allow for completion of its lifecycle. This species is observed from January through March.
 Arroyo toad (Anaxyrus californicus) is a federally endangered species, CDFW SSC species, and MSHCP covered species. It is found in low-gradient streams and rivers that have intermittent and perennial flows. This toad is small, stocky, and warty; it is 2 to 3 inches in length. Color is a light olive green, gray, or light brown with a light “V” shaped stripe across the head, eyelids, and spots.

Belly is white or buff colored and generally without spots.  California red-legged frog (Rana draytonii) is a federally threatened species, CDFW SSC species, and MSHCP covered species. It is also listed as an SSC under CDFW. It is the largest native frog in the western U.S. ranging from 1.75 to 5.25 inches (snout to vent). Color, from above, can range from brown, gray, olive, red, to orange. Dark specks of spots are along the back. From the eye to the hip, on both sides of the back, is a dorsolateral fold or ridge.  Swainson’s hawk (Buteo swainsoni) is a state-listed threatened species and MSHCP covered species. It is also a BCC under USFWS and a sensitive species under the Bureau of Land Management. This hawk is medium sized with longer, pointed wings that curve upward in flight.

This species has three morphs that vary in coloration: light, intermediate, and dark. They can be found around the riparian systems but also can be found in agricultural fields and pastures.  Western snowy plover (Danaus plexippus pop. 1) is a federally threatened species and CDFW SSC species. They are primarily found in open, sandy areas adjacent to water. Breeding season occurs from March through September. Nests are made on the ground and made of various materials.

Nonbreeding adults and immatures have a brown-gray back with white belly. Breeding adults develop stronger black coloration around the face near the shoulders, eyes, and forehead.  Southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus) is a federally and state-listed endangered species and MSHCP covered species. This flycatcher has a grayish-green back and 1282
Biological Resources Assessment
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
106 November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
wings, white throat, gray olive breast and pale yellow belly. During its breeding season, it can be found near riparian forests.
 Coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica) is a federally listed threatened species and MSHCP covered species. It is also an SSC under CDFW. It is a small blue-gray songbird that has dark blue gray feathers on its back and grayish white on its underside. The wings are brown in color, and the tail is mostly black with white outer tail feathers. They have a white ring around the eyes. They prefer coastal sage scrub and desert scrub.

4.5.2.1 Critical Habitat
The USFWS designated Critical Habitat for coastal California gnatcatcher in 2000 and revised the designated Critical Habitat in 2007. Critical habitat exists within Riverside County and within the City for the coastal California gnatcatcher (Figure 2B). Critical habitat is located south and southeast of Bundy Canyon within the City. Furthermore, critical habitat is located immediate north of the City and just east of Lake Elsinore. Unit 10 exists within both San Bernardino and Riverside Counties. The 2007 revision of the critical habitat reduced the original 199,940 acres designated in 2000 to 27,529 acres. Of the total acres in this Unit, 21,776 acres are within the MSHCP plan area.  Least bell’s vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus) is a state and federally listed endangered species and MSHCP covered species. This species prefers dense shrub habitats including scrub oak, riverine scrub, saltcedar stands, and coastal chaparral. The least bell’s vireo is gray/brown above and white below. It has a faint outline around the eyes.
 San Bernardino kangaroo rat (Dipodomys merriami parvus) is a state and federally listed endangered species and a CDFW SSC. This species is also an MSHCP covered species. This species’ preferred habitat is alluvial fan sage scrub. It is one of three recognized subspecies of Dipodomys merriami and the only one with four toes.
 Stephens’ kangaroo rat (Dipodomys stephensi) is a federally endangered, state threatened species, and MSHCP covered species. It can be found in arid and semi-arid habitats. Stephens’ kangaroo rats have tails that can be twice as long as the body. They have light brown fur that is lighter on the legs and along the ventral surface.
1283
Biological Resources Assessment
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
107 November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
Table 6. Special-Status Wildlife Species Identified in the Literature Review Common and
Scientific
Name
Status*
Federal/State/

USFS/MSHCP
Habitats
Invertebrates
Crotch bumble
bee
Bombus crotchii
None/CAN/None/Not
Covered
Found in coastal California east to the Sierra-Cascade crest and south into Mexico. Occurs in open grassland and scrub habitats.

Prefers a diet consisting of certain plant species including milkweeds, dusty maidens, lupines, medics, phacelias, sages, clarkias, poppies, and wild buckwheats. Nests are often located underground in abandoned rodent nests or above ground in tufts of grass, old bird nests, rock piles, or cavities in dead trees.

Vernal pool fairy
shrimp
Branchinecta
lynchi
THR/None/None/Not
Covered
Occurs in vernal pools and ephemeral wetlands. Typically occurs in small and shallow pools with mud or grassy bottoms.

San Diego fairy
shrimp
Branchinecta
sandiegonensis
END/None/None/Not
Covered Occurs in vernal pools and non-vegetated ephemeral basins.

Monarch
butterfly
Danaus plexippus
plexippus pop. 1
CAN/None/S/Not
Covered
Roosts in wind-protected tree groves (coastal California conifer and eucalyptus species) from Northern Mendocino to Baja California. Milkweed is essential for the larvae of this species.

Quino
checkerspot
butterfly
Euphydryas
editha quino
END/None/None/
Covered
Occurs in chaparral and coastal sage scrublands, containing the proper host plant and abundant nectar resources. Primary host plants include dwarf plantain (Plantago erecta), white
snapdragon (Anterrhinum coulterianum), woolly plantain
(Plantago patagonica), and Chinese houses (Collinsia concolor) Santa Rosa
Plateau fairy
shrimp
Linderiella
santarosae
None/None/None/
Covered
Occurs in cool-water vernal pools that are formed from Southern Basalt Flows.

Riverside fairy
shrimp
Streptocephalus
woottoni
END/None/None/
Covered
Occurs in vernal pools, tectonic swales, and earth slump basins in Riverside County.
1284
Biological Resources Assessment
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
108 November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
Table 6. Special-Status Wildlife Species Identified in the Literature Review Common and
Scientific
Name
Status*
Federal/State/

USFS/MSHCP
Habitats
Fish
Arroyo chub
Gila orcuttii
None/SSC/S/ Covered
Occurs in creeks, streams, and rivers with areas of slow-moving water with sand or mud bottoms. Ranges from San Diego to San Luis Obispo county.

Amphibians
Arroyo toad
Anaxyrus
californicus
END/SSC/None/ Covered
Occurs along the sandy banks of rivers, arroyos, and streams with shallow sandy pools. Also found in riparian woodlands or uplands adjacent to arroyos.

California redlegged frog
Rana draytonii
THR/SSC/None/ Covered Occurs near water features such as ponds or streams in humid forests, grasslands, coastal scrub, and woodlands.

Western
spadefoot
Spea hammondii
None/SSC/None/ Covered
Occurs in open areas with sandy soils in a wide range of habitats including lowlands to foothills, coastal sage scrub, chaparral, mixed woodlands, alluvial fans, and grasslands.

Coast Range
newt
Taricha torosa
None/SSC/None/ Covered
Occurs in wet forests, oak forests, chaparral, and rolling grasslands. In southern California, it will occur in drier chaparral, oak woodland, and grasslands. Eggs are laid or attached by the female to submerged vegetation, logs, or rocks.

Reptiles
Southern
California legless
lizard
Anniella stebbinsi
None/SSC/S/Not Covered Occurs in coastal sand dunes, scrubs, chaparral, and a variety of interior habitats, including sandy washes and alluvial fans.

California glossy
snake
Arizona elegans
occidentalis
None/SSC/None/Not
Covered
Occurs in arid scrub, rocky washes, grasslands, chaparral.

Typically in open areas and areas with loose soil for burrowing.

Orange-throated
whiptail
Aspidoscelis
hyperythra
None/None/S/ Covered Occurs in semi-arid open areas with coarse soils including coastal sage scrub, chaparral, and dry riparian areas and washes. 1285
Biological Resources Assessment
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
109 November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
Table 6. Special-Status Wildlife Species Identified in the Literature Review Common and
Scientific
Name
Status*
Federal/State/

USFS/MSHCP
Habitats
Coastal whiptail
Aspidoscelis tigris
stejnegeri
None/SSC/None/ Covered Occurs in arid habitats including chaparral, woodlands, and dry riparian areas.

Red-diamond
rattlesnake
Crotalus ruber
None/SSC/S/ Covered Occurs in coastal chaparral, arid scrub, rocky grassland, oak and pine woodlands, desert mountain slopes, and rocky desert flats.

Western pond
turtle
Emys marmorata
None/SSC/S/ Covered
Occurs in ponds, lakes, rivers, streams, creeks, marshes, and irrigation ditches with abundant vegetation. Also occurs in either rocky or muddy bottoms of these aquatic environments. Can also occur in woodland, forest, and grassland habitats.

Blainsville’s
horned lizard
Phrynosoma
blainvillii
None/SSC/None/ Covered
Occurs in open areas of valleys, foothills, and semiarid mountains with sandy soil and low vegetation including chaparral, woodlands, and grasslands.

Coast patchnosed snake
Salvadora
hexalepis
virgultea
None/SSC/None/Not
Covered
Occurs in open arid and semi-arid areas such as deserts, brushland, grassland, and in scrub along canyons, rocky hillsides, sandy plains.

Two-striped
gartersnake
Thamnophis
hammondii
None/SSC/S/Not Covered
Occurs along aquatic habitats such as creeks and pools with rocky areas in chaparral, brushland, oak woodlands, and conifer forests. Requires water for foraging.

Birds
Cooper’s hawk
Accipiter cooperii
None/None/None/
Covered
Occurs within forests and woodlands. Also occurs in
neighborhoods and parks. Nests are typically built in pines, oaks, Douglas-fir, birches, spruces, and other taller trees that occur on flat ground and in dense woods.

Southern
California rufouscrowned sparrow
Aimophila
ruficeps canescens
None/None/None/
Covered
Occurs on dry, open hillsides covered with grasses, rocks, and scattered shrubs. Chaparral, coastal sagebrush, scrub oaks, and pinyon pine are common habitats. Not associated with dense, woody vegetation. Nests are built on the ground near the base of a shrub.
1286
Biological Resources Assessment
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
110 November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
Table 6. Special-Status Wildlife Species Identified in the Literature Review Common and
Scientific
Name
Status*
Federal/State/

USFS/MSHCP
Habitats
Golden eagle
Aquila chrysaetos
None/FP/None/ Covered
Occurs in open and semi-open habitats. Found alongside
canyonlands, rimrock terrain, and riverside cliffs and bluffs. They avoid developed areas and uninterrupted stretches of forest.

Nesting occurs on cliffs but can occur in trees, on the ground, or in artificial structures. Nesting can also occur in grassland, chaparral, shrubland, forest, and other vegetated areas.

Bell’s sparrow
Artemisiospiza
belli belli
None/None/None/
Covered
Breeding occurs in coastal sagebrush, chaparral, and open, scrubby habitats. Within chaparral, they are often found in young, less dense stands. Nesting occurs within shrubs, bunchgrasses and occasionally California sagebrush, brittlebush, white sage, black sage, California buckwheat, bush mallow, chamise, cholla, and willow. During winter they will utilize saltbush-dominated desert scrub and creosote.

Burrowing owl
Athene
cunicularia
None/SSC/None/ Covered
Occurs in a variety of habitats characterized by dry annual or perennial low-growing vegetation. Occurs in grasslands, scrublands, agricultural fields, vacant lots, and other disturbed areas. Nests in abandoned burrows and requires an abundance of prey (e.g., ground squirrels and insects).

Swainson’s hawk
Buteo swainsoni
None/THR/None/
Covered
Occurs in great basin grassland, great basin scrub, pinyon and juniper woodlands and valley and foothill grasslands.

Western snowy
plover
Charadrius
nivosus nivosus
THR/SSC/None/Not
Covered Occurs in sand spits and dune-backed beaches.

White-tailed kite
Elanus leucurus
None/FP/None/Not
Covered
Occurs in low elevation, open grasslands, savannah-like habitats, agricultural areas, wetlands, and oak woodlands. Typically use riparian scrub, forest and woodland, and oak woodland and forest for breeding and use a wide variety of more open grassland/agricultural land and scrub lands for foraging. Nesting occurs in the upper third of trees; trees can be isolated or at the edge of or within a forest.

Southwestern
willow flycatcher
Empidonax traillii
extimus
END/END/None/ Covered
Occurs within riparian woodlands, particularly those with willow thickets. Nests in areas of shrubs and trees with low-density canopies.
1287
Biological Resources Assessment
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
111 November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
Table 6. Special-Status Wildlife Species Identified in the Literature Review Common and
Scientific
Name
Status*
Federal/State/

USFS/MSHCP
Habitats
California horned
lark
Eremophila
alpestris actia
None/None/None/
Covered
Occurs in areas with bare, dry ground or with sparse vegetation.

Common habitats include beaches, heavily grazed pastures, and deserts. They are common in areas with signs of human
disturbance. Nests are placed on bare ground.

Yellow-breasted
chat
Icteria virens
None/SSC/None/ Covered
Occurs in riparian and upland thickets as well as dry overgrown pastures. Prefers to nest in dense scrub along streams or at the edges of ponds or swamps.

Loggerhead
shrike
Lanius
ludovicianus
None/SSC/None/ Covered
Occurs in open country, with scattered shrubs and trees or other perches for hunting. Common habitats include agricultural fields, deserts, grasslands, savanna, and chaparral.

White-faced ibis
Plegadis chihi
None/None/None/
Covered
Occurs in freshwater habitats such as ponds, rivers, marshes, and swamps. Nests in low trees or on the ground within reeds in marshes.

Coastal California
gnatcatcher
Polioptila
californica
californica
THR/SSC/None/ Covered
Occurs in dry coastal slopes, washes, and mesas with areas of low vegetation and coastal sage scrub. USFWS-designated critical habitat for this species is located within the City.

Least Bell's vireo
Vireo bellii
pusillus
END/END/None/ Covered
Occurs within willows and riparian forest, scrub, and woodlands.

Breeds in low dense growth, especially in second-growth scrub or brushy fields.

Mammals
San Bernardino
kangaroo rat
Dipodomys
merriami parvus
END/END and SSC/None/
Covered
Occurs in alluvial sage scrub, flood plains, washes, and upland areas adjacent to desert habitat.

Stephens’
kangaroo rat
Dipodomys
stephensi
THR/THR/None/ Covered
Occurs in coastal scrub and valley and vegetated temperate foothill grasslands. Endemic to southern California, primarily in western Riverside County.
1288
Biological Resources Assessment
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
112 November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
Table 6. Special-Status Wildlife Species Identified in the Literature Review Common and
Scientific
Name
Status*
Federal/State/

USFS/MSHCP
Habitats
Western mastiff
bat
Eumops perotis
californicus
None/SSC/None/Not
Covered
Occurs in a variety of habitats including dry desert washes, flood plains, chaparral, oak woodland, open ponderosa pine forest, grassland, montane meadows, and agricultural areas.

Western yellow
bat
Lasiurus
xanthinus
None/SSC/None/Not
Covered
Occurs in valley foothill riparian, desert riparian, desert wash, and palm oasis habitat.

Southern
grasshopper
mouse
Onychomys
torridus ramona
None/SSC/None/Not
Covered
Occurs in arid Mojavean desert habitats, alkali desert scrub, succulent shrub, wash, and riparian areas. Also occurs in coastal scrub, mixed chaparral, sagebrush, and bitterbrush habitats.

Los Angeles
pocket mouse
Perognathus
longimembris
brevinasus
None/SSC/None/ Covered Occurs in arid and semi-arid habitats such as coastal sage scrub, grasslands, and washes.
*Status Codes:

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
113 November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077

4.6 Critical Habitat and Essential Fish Habitat
The City does not include Essential Fish Habitat; however, it does include USFWS-designated Critical Habitat for coastal California gnatcatcher (USFWS 2023c; Figure 2B).

4.7 Riparian Habitats and Sensitive Natural Communities Sensitive habitat types exist throughout the City. These are considered sensitive by resource agencies such as USFWS and CDFW due to their scarcity or ability to support state or federally endangered or threatened species of plants and wildlife. A CNDDB search was conducted and recorded five sensitive natural vegetation communities within or near the City (Appendix D). Individual project surveys would be required to conduct project-level mapping to determine the extent of sensitive vegetation communities within the City. A description of each sensitive natural community is included below with the natural community’s name identified through CNDDB followed by the comparable vegetation alliance name found in Manual of California Vegetation (CNPS 2023b), when applicable. It is important to note that the vegetation communities and land cover types shown on Figure 4 were mapped by Western Riverside County RCA and may not include these five sensitive natural vegetation communities that were identified in the CNDDB.

Southern Coast Live Oak Riparian Forest/Quercus agrifolia Forest & Woodland Alliance ranges from open to dense and is dominated by coast live oak. It is located in outer floodplains and along streams.

Vegetation tends to be herbaceous with little to no understory. Common plants include mugwort (Artemisia douglasiana), California wild rose (Rosa californica), Mexican elderberry (Sambucus mexicana), and poison oak (Toxicodendron diversilobum).

Southern Cottonwood Willow Riparian Forest/ Populus fremontii- Fraxinus velutina- Salix gooddingii Forest & Woodland Alliance consists of tall, open, deciduous riparian forest species with Fremont cottonwood (Populus fremontii), western sycamore, and willows (Salix spp.) as the predominant tree species.

Commonly occurs near perennial drainages such as canyon bottoms and along streams.

Southern Interior Basalt Flow Vernal Pool does not have a comparable alliance in CNPS due to the location of the City. However, NatureServe (2022) does have a Group called California Vernal Pool that may most closely describe the Southern Interior Basalt Flow Vernal Pool. This group consists of wet meadows throughout southern California that form concentric rings around shallow ephemeral pools.

These pools fill and dry out seasonally or semi-annually. Plant species common to this group include Jepson’s button celery (Eryngium aristulatum), southern tarplant (Centromadia parryi ssp. australis), Coulter goldfields (Lasthenia glabrata ssp. coulteri), spreading navarretia (Navarretia fossalis), California Orcutt grass (Orcuttia californica), San Diego mesa mint (Pogogyne abramsii), Otay mesa mint (Pogogyne nudiuscula), and San Jacinto bluecurls (Trichostema austromontanum).

Southern Sycamore Alder Riparian Woodland/Platanus racemosa- Quercus agrifolia Woodland Alliance consists of trees less than 35 meters with an intermittent or open canopy. The shrub layer is also open to intermittent while the herbaceous layer is sparse or grassy. Western sycamore makes up about 30 percent of the tree canopy; coast live oak, willows (Salix spp.), and Fremont cottonwood are co-dominant species.

Along riparian areas, coast live oak is the dominant cover along with willows and poison oak. 1290
Biological Resources Assessment
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
114 November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
Valley Needlegrass Grassland/Nassella spp.- Melica spp. Herbaceous Alliance consists of herbs that are less than one meter in height and that provide open to continuous coverage. Dominant species include California melic (Melica californica), Torrey’s melic grass (Melica torreyana), nodding needlegrass (Nassella cernua), small flowered needlegrass (Nassella lepida), and purple needlegrass (Nassella pulchra). Soils are high in clay, loam, sand, or silt.

As described in Section 4.3, the general vegetation communities and land cover types within the City include agricultural lands, chaparral, coastal sage scrub, grassland, meadows and marshes, riparian scrub, woodland, and forests, water, woodland and forests, and developed/disturbed areas. These general vegetation communities and land cover types can be more finely classified into vegetation alliances.

Further, these general communities have the potential to be composed of vegetation alliances, which may be considered sensitive natural communities by CDFW. The City likely includes vegetation communities other than those described in this assessment that may also be considered sensitive natural communities by CDFW.

4.8 Wildlife Movement/Corridors and Nursery Sites
The continued protection and establishment of wildlife corridors is highly important to the City. As development continues and habitat fragments, it becomes harder for wildlife to travel between these fragments of their habitat. Wildlife corridors are linear landscape elements that provide for wildlife species movement and dispersal between two or more habitats. Wildlife corridors contribute to population viability by assuring continual exchange of genes between populations, providing access to adjacent habitat areas for foraging and mating, and providing routes for recolonization of habitat after local displacement or ecological catastrophes (e.g., fires). Wildlife corridors could be bound by development or areas unsuitable for wildlife, but could contain enough food, cover, and/or water to facilitate wildlife movement between habitat patches and prevent isolation of populations. Travel routes are landscape features (i.e., ridgelines, drainages, canyons, or riparian areas) that are used by wildlife to gain access to essential resources. Areas adjoining two habitats are also often referred to as habitat linkages.

Wildlife corridors can exist throughout the City and projects should include an analysis of wildlife corridors and nursey sites. A large expanse of natural habitat within the City exists at the foothills of the Cleveland National Forest. However, due to development within the City, movement from the City into the Cleveland National Forest and vice versa, is limited. The City is highly developed, and I-15 bisects the City as it runs generally north-south and further limits the success of wildlife dispersal.

An additional movement corridor exists in the form of Murrieta Creek. Creeks and drainages often provide wildlife with ways to move throughout developed landscapes. Additionally, the San Andreas Rift Zone is within and adjacent to the City and provides unique topographical characteristics, microclimates, and habitats that allow for linkage of habitats and can facilitate movement.

The development of the MSHCP included an assessment of core habitat areas and linkages within the MSHCP plan area; these core habitats and linkages provide suitable habitat for Covered Species and allow movement throughout the plan area. Areas of core habitat generally consists of blocks of habitat of sufficient size to support the life history requirements of Covered Species or reduce edge effects. Linkages primarily facilitate movement and provide a connection to core habitat. Within the City, Criteria Cells 1291
Biological Resources Assessment
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
115 November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
reference the preservation or contribution to the assembly of Proposed Linkage 8 and Proposed Extension of Existing Core 3. A summary of these as they relate to the City and facilitate wildlife movement is provided below:
 Proposed Linkage 8 consists primarily of upland habitat and is a major component of one of the two main east-west connections between Lake Mathews/Estelle Mountain, Alberhill, and the Cleveland National Forest in the west and French Valley, Johnson Ranch, Diamond Valley Lake, and San Jacinto Mountains in the east. This linkage begins on the west side of the I-15 near Lake Elsinore which is north of the City. It then continues south, parallel to the I-15, through the City until moving east toward Diamond Valley Lake. This linkage provides movement corridors and habitat for sensitive wildlife species such as coastal California gnatcatcher, Quino checkerspot butterfly, and Stephens’ kangaroo rat. A total of 5,470 acres are included in this linkage.  Proposed Extension of Existing Core 3 consists of two blocks of land that extend from the southern border of Lake Elsinore. This Extension occurs in the northeastern portion of the City.

This Extension conserves soils of the Traver series and therefore protects habitat for Narrow Endemic Plants including Munz’s onion, San Diego ambrosia, and smooth tarplant. Sensitive wildlife species are also associated with this Extension and include Riverside fairy shrimp, Quino checkerspot butterfly, western pond turtle, and shorebirds. A total of 1,290 acres are included in this Extension.

The City likely provides wildlife movement opportunities because it consists of open land and preserved areas. Although the City’s value as a corridor is lessened by the high amount of development, the City still offers ways for wildlife to move through the landscape. Lastly, bird rookeries, bat maternity roost sites, and other nursery sites have the potential to exist within the City.

5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
This section provides general recommendations to avoid, minimize, and/or mitigate potential impacts to biological resources that may be associated with future development and implementation of the General Plan within the City. These recommendations are consistent with requirements under the MSHCP.

Appendix A includes flow charts that generally summarize the main steps for biological resources recommendations.

This section refers to project-related activities as actions and provides general recommendations to ensure compliance with the local policies, ordinances, and other relevant plans.

5.1 General Biological Measures
BIO-1: If an action may adversely impact biological resources, a qualified biologist or their trained designee should conduct mandatory worker environmental awareness training for all parties involved with implementation of the action (e.g., contractors and work crews) to aid the parties in recognizing special-status species and other sensitive biological resources that may occur within the action area. The training shall include identification of the specialstatus species with potential to occur and their habitats, a description of the regulatory 1292
Biological Resources Assessment
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
116 November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
status of sensitive resources, and review of the impact limits, location of environmentally sensitive areas, and measures required to reduce impacts to avoided onsite and offsite biological resources.

BIO-2: If an action has potential to inadvertently impact avoided onsite or offsite biological resources, develop and implement appropriate measures to ensure all impacts occur only in the action area. Appropriate measures may include control of sediment, erosion, and hazardous materials; demarcation of action area prior to implementation and maintenance of demarcation through the duration of implementation; and measures to ensure all actions that have potential to impact biological resources stay within the demarcated limits.

5.2 Special-Status Species
Multiple special-status species are documented to occur or have the potential to occur within the City and/or may be potentially affected by activities in the City, as described in Tables 5 and 6. However, these tables should not be considered a complete list of special-status species that may occur within the City.

New occurrences of special-status species, not yet recorded in the City Area, may be documented in the future. Recommendations to avoid, minimize, or mitigate potential impacts to special-status species from future project-related actions within the City are included in the following sections.

5.2.1 Wildlife
WLD-1: If an action has potential to adversely impact amphibian species (e.g., may impact potential habitat for amphibians or may otherwise result in disturbance to amphibians from noise, light, or some other potentially disturbing activity), determine if the proposed project falls within the mapped survey area for amphibian species (arroyo toad, California red-legged frog, and mountain yellow-legged frog [Rana muscosa]) and if suitable habitat is present, then focused surveys will be required. Focused surveys should be conducted in accordance with accepted survey protocols for the arroyo toad, California red-legged frog, and mountain yellow-legged frog. If the proposed project is not located within an amphibian survey area, include a statement to this effect and no further action is required. If it is determined after the habitat assessment that there is no potential habitat for amphibian species to occur within the proposed project, a conclusion that no suitable habitat is present on the site supported with solid evidence and no other measures are recommended. If conditions or circumstances change after the environmental analysis is conducted and prior to implementation of the action, then the validity of the results should be confirmed, or an updated environmental analysis should be conducted prior to impacting the project site.

If amphibian species are identified within the project site and the proposed project cannot avoid (permanent or temporary) at least 90% of the occupied portion of the property that contributes to the long-term conservation value of the species, a DBESP is required. A solid justification regarding how the 90% and 10% determinations were made is required.

WLD-2: If an action has potential to adversely impact the burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia) (e.g., may impact potential habitat or may otherwise result in disturbance to burrowing owls from 1293
Biological Resources Assessment
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
117 November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
noise, light, or some other potentially disturbing activity), determine if the proposed project falls within the mapped (designated) survey area for the burrowing owl and if suitable habitat is present, then focused surveys will be required. Focused surveys should be conducted in accordance with the MSHCP Burrowing Owl Survey Instructions and during the breeding season (survey window is March 1-August 31). If the proposed project is not located within the burrowing owl survey area, include a statement to this effect and no further action is required. If it is determined after the habitat assessment that there is no potential habitat for burrowing owls to occur within the project site, a conclusion that no suitable habitat is present on the site supported with solid evidence and no other measures are recommended. If conditions or circumstances change after the environmental analysis is conducted and prior to implementation of the action, then the validity of the results should be confirmed, or an updated environmental analysis should be conducted prior to impacting the project site.

If burrowing owls are not found during focused surveys, documentation should include a written commitment to conduct pre-construction surveys for the burrowing owl in areas of suitable habitat no more than 30 days prior to the initiation of ground disturbance (e.g., vegetation clearing, clearing and grubbing, tree removal, site watering, equipment staging, grading, etc.) to ensure that no owls have colonized the site in the days or weeks preceding the ground-disturbing activities. If burrowing owls have colonized the project site prior to the initiation of ground-disturbing activities, the project proponent will immediately inform the Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) and the Wildlife Agencies and will need to coordinate further with RCA and the Wildlife Agencies, including the possibility of preparing a Burrowing Owl Protection and Relocation Plan, prior to initiating ground disturbance. If ground-disturbing activities occur, but the site is left undisturbed for more than 30 days, a pre-construction survey will be required again to ensure burrowing owl has not colonized the site since it was last disturbed. If the burrowing owl is found, the same coordination described above will be necessary.

If burrowing owls are identified within the project site and the proposed project cannot avoid (permanent or temporary) at least 90% of the occupied portion of the property that contributes to the long-term conservation value of the species, a DBESP is required and a Burrowing Owl Protection and Relocation Plan. A solid justification regarding how the 90% and 10% determinations were made is required.

WLD-3: If the proposed project falls within an area with Delhi soils mapped using the MSHCP baseline data, an assessment of habitat for the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly (Rhaphiomidas terminatus abdominalis; DSFLF) is required. If an action has potential to adversely impact DSFLF and if suitable habitat is present, then 2 years of focused surveys will be required.

Focused surveys should be conducted in accordance with the accepted USFWS protocol and surveys are conducted 2 times per week from July 1 to September 20 for 2 consecutive years under suitable conditions. If the proposed project is not located within a Delhi soil mapped area, include a statement to this effect and no further action is required. If it is determined 1294
Biological Resources Assessment
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
118 November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
after the habitat assessment that there is no potential habitat for DSFLF to occur within the project site, a conclusion that no suitable habitat is present on the site supported with solid evidence and no other measures are recommended. If conditions or circumstances change after the environmental analysis is conducted and prior to implementation of the action, then the validity of the results should be confirmed, or an updated environmental analysis should be conducted prior to impacting the proposed project.  If DSFLF are identified within the project site and the proposed project cannot avoid DSFLF (permanent or temporary) then 75% of mapped Delhi soils on the site must be conserved and a DBESP is required. A solid justification regarding how the 75% determination was made is required and must be conducted in coordination with USFWS.

WLD-4: If an action has potential to adversely impact vernal pools or other suitable fairy shrimp habitats, then focused surveys will be required. Focused surveys should be conducted pursuant to the USFWS Survey Guidelines for the Listed Large Branchiopods, which includes six listed fairy shrimp species, including those species covered under the MSHCP Section

6.1.2. Two seasons of fairy shrimp surveys are required. If it is determined after the habitat assessment that there is no potential habitat for vernal pools or fairy shrimp species to occur within the project site, a conclusion that no suitable habitat is present on the site supported with solid evidence and no other measures are recommended. If conditions or circumstances change after the environmental analysis is conducted and prior to implementation of the action, then the validity of the results should be confirmed, or an updated environmental analysis should be conducted prior to impacting the proposed project.  If fairy shrimp species are identified within the project site and the proposed project cannot avoid (permanent or temporary) at least 90% of the occupied portion of the property that contributes to the long-term conservation value of the species, a DBESP is required. A solid justification regarding how the 90% and 10% determinations were made is required.

WLD-5: If an action has potential to adversely impact riparian bird species (least Bell’s vireo, southwestern willow flycatcher, or yellow-billed cuckoo [Coccyzus americanus]), if suitable habitat (nesting and/or foraging) is present, then protocol-level focused surveys will be required. Focused surveys should be conducted in accordance with accepted USFWS survey protocols for the least Bell’s vireo, southwestern willow flycatcher, and yellow-billed cuckoo.

If it is determined after the habitat assessment that there is no potential habitat for riparian bird species to occur within the project site, a conclusion that no suitable habitat is present on the site supported with solid evidence and no other measures are recommended. If conditions or circumstances change after the environmental analysis is conducted and prior to implementation of the action, then the validity of the results should be confirmed, or an updated environmental analysis should be conducted prior to impacting the proposed project.
1295
Biological Resources Assessment
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
119 November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
 If least Bell’s vireo are identified within the project site and the proposed project cannot demonstrate 90% avoidance of the occupied portion of the property that contributes to the long-term conservation value of the species, a DBESP is required.

This includes 100 meters of undeveloped landscape on the property adjacent to the habitat conserved. A solid justification regarding how the 90% and 10% determinations were made is required.
 If southwestern willow flycatcher or yellow-billed cuckoo are identified within the project site, if the proposed project cannot avoid and demonstrate 100% conservation of the property that contributes to the long-term conservation value of the species, a DBESP is required. This includes 100 meters of undeveloped landscape on the property adjacent to the habitat conserved.

WLD-6: If suitable habitat is present (i.e., coastal sage scrub, Riversidean sage scrub) and an action has potential to adversely impact the coastal California gnatcatcher, avoid clearing, grubbing, grading, and associated construction actions in gnatcatcher occupied habitat within the Criteria Cells and/or PQP lands between March 1 and August 15. If this species is detected and the project could be potentially occupied and the habitat cannot be avoided, this habitat cannot be removed from March 1 to August 15 without conducting focused protocol-level surveys to prove absence. The MSHCP does not allow take of any nesting birds , regardless of the time of year, pursuant to the MBTA and applicable Fish and Game Codes.

BRD-1: If an action that may adversely impact birds or nests (e.g., ground or vegetation disturbance, noise near nesting habitat) and is expected is to occur during the nesting season (generally February 1 through September 15), a pre-construction nesting-bird survey should be conducted for all suitable nesting habitat within 3 days prior to implementation of the action. The survey should be conducted by a qualified biologist within the project site plus a buffer for the project as determined by the qualified biologist (based on the action and what bird species may be impacted). If no nesting birds are observed during the survey, site preparation and construction activities may begin. If nesting birds (including nesting raptors) are found to be present, avoidance or minimization measures shall be undertaken to avoid potential Project-related impacts. Measures may include seasonal work restrictions or establishment of a non-disturbance buffer around each active nest until nesting has been completed as determined through periodic nest monitoring by the biologist. The size of the non-disturbance buffer will be determined by the Project biologist. Typically, this is 300-feet from the nest site in all directions (500-feet is typically recommended by CDFW for listed species and raptors), until the juveniles have fledged and there has been no evidence of a second attempt at nesting. Once nesting is deemed complete by the Project biologist, work may resume within the buffer.
1296
Biological Resources Assessment
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
120 November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077

5.3 Riparian Habitat/Riverine Areas, and Vernal Pools
VEG-1: If sensitive natural communities (riparian habitat, riverine areas, vernal pools) are identified within the impact area (permanent and temporary, direct and indirect), appropriate measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate for impacts to sensitive natural communities should be implemented. If riparian/riverine resources and vernal pools are proposed for avoidance, the report should include a commitment to place a conservation easement or deed restriction over the area in order to demonstrate that the area will be protected in perpetuity. If the proposed project cannot avoid riparian/riverine habitat and/or vernal pools in perpetuity (both permanent and temporarily), a DBESP would be required that would propose mitigation that demonstrates equivalent or superior function and value.

RIP-1: If an action will impact riparian habitat, a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement, pursuant to Section 1602 of the California Department of Fish and Game Code should be obtained. Minimization measures will be developed during consultation with CDFW as part of the Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement process to ensure protection for affected fish and wildlife resources.

5.4 Aquatic Resources, Including Waters of the U.S. and State WTR-1: If an action has the potential to impact aquatic resources, an environmental analysis (i.e., a preliminary aquatic resources delineation) should be conducted to determine if potentially regulated aquatic resources occur within the proposed project. A qualified wetland delineator should conduct the environmental analysis and it should include review of the best available hydrological information, a reconnaissance-level site visit, and an evaluation of aquatic resources to determine the potential for regulated aquatic resources to occur within the project site. If it is determined that there are no potentially regulated aquatic resources, no other measures are recommended. If conditions or circumstances change after the environmental analysis is conducted and prior to implementation of the action, the validity of the results should be confirmed or an updated environmental analysis should be conducted prior to impacting the proposed project.

WTR-2: If an action may impact potentially regulated aquatic resources, an aquatic resources delineation should be conducted for the project consistent with the methods detailed within the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987), Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Arid West Region (USACE 2008), and State Wetlands Definitions and Procedures for Discharges of Dredged and Fill Material to Waters of the State, and local policies by the CDFW regarding their jurisdiction, following the definitions contained within the California Fish and Game Code pertaining to regulated resources (lakes, streams, and associated hydrophytic vegetation). If it is determined that potentially regulated aquatic resources are absent from the project site or will not be impacted by the action, no other measures are recommended.

If it is determined that potentially regulated aquatic resources may be impacted by the 1297
Biological Resources Assessment
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
121 November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
action, the delineation should be submitted to the USACE, and a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination or Approved Jurisdictional Determination should be obtained.

5.5 Wildlife Movement/Corridors and Nursery Sites
WLD-7: If an action will substantially impact wildlife movement, established wildlife corridors, or impede the use of nursery sites, measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate for significant impacts should be implemented and may be determined in consultation with the appropriate regulatory agency (e.g., CDFW, USFWS).

5.6 Local Policies, Ordinances, and Other Plans
Local policies and ordinances that are applicable to the City are discussed earlier in Section 2.3 of this document. Projects should ensure that these local policies and ordinances are included in the assessment of impacts to biological resources and any required mitigation to reduce impacts. 1298
Biological Resources Assessment
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
122 November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077

6.0 REFERENCES
Calflora. 2023. The Calflora Database, Berkeley, CA. Available at: https://www.calflora.org/search.html.

Accessed October 2023.

California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2023a. California Natural Community List. Available at:
https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=153398. Accessed October 2023. _______. 2023b. RareFind 5 California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB). Sacramento, CA, CDFW Biogeographic Data Branch.
_______. 2018. Protocols for Surveying and Evaluating Impacts to Special Status Native Plant Populations and Sensitive Natural Communities. Sacramento, California. Available at:
https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=18959&inline. Accessed October 2023.

California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2016. Technical Guidance of Assessment and Mitigation of the Effects of Traffic Noise and Road Construction Noise on Bats. Available at:
https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/environmental-analysis/documents/env/noiseeffects-on-bats-jul2016-a11y.pdf. Accessed October 2023.

California Native Plant Society (CNPS). 2023a. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants in California (online edition, v8-03 0.39). California Native Plant Society. Sacramento, CA. Available online:
http://www.rareplants.cnps.org/. Accessed October 2023. ______. 2023b. A Manual of California Vegetation, Online Edition. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA. Available: https://vegetation.cnps.org/. Accessed October 2023. _______. 2001. CNPS Botanical Survey Guidelines. California Native Plant Society. Available online:
https://cnps.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/cnps_survey_guidelines.pdf. Accessed October 2023.

Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-

1. U. S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station. Vicksburg, Mississippi.

Jepson eFlora. 2023. Jepson Flora Project (eds.). Available: https://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/eflora/. Accessed October 2023.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 2023a. NOAA NMFS ESA Critical Habitat Mapper. Available at:
https://noaa.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=68d8df16b39c48fe9f60640692d 0e318. Accessed October 2023.
______. 2023b. NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper. Available at:
https://www.habitat.noaa.gov/apps/efhmapper/?page=page_4. Accessed October 2023.

Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 2023a. Web Soil Survey. Retrieved from:
https://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx. Accessed October 2023. 1299
Biological Resources Assessment
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
123 November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
______. 2023b. Soil Data Access Hydric Soils List. Retrieved from:
https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/publications/query-by-ssa.html. Accessed October 2023.

NatureServe Explorer (NatureServe). 2022. Group Californian Vernal Pool. Available at:
https://explorer.natureserve.org/Taxon/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.857252/Californian_Vernal_Pool_Grou p.

Riverside County Integrative Project (RCIP). 2003a. County of Riverside General Plan. Available at:
https://cdnsm5-
hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_9894739/File/Government/Departments/Planning/G eneral%20Plan.pdf.
_____. 2003b. Conservation planning process/description and area plan criteria of the MSHCP conservation area. Elsinore area plan. Available at: https://www.wrcrca.org/GIS_Online_Mapping/MSHCP_docs/AreaPlans/MSHCP%20Elsinore%20AreaPlan%20Doc.p df.
_____. 2003c. Conservation planning process/description and area plan criteria of the MSHCP conservation area. Southwest area plan. Available at: https://www.wrcrca.org/GIS_Online_Mapping/MSHCP_docs/AreaPlans/MSHCP%20Southwest%20Area%20AreaPla n%20Doc.pdf.

Riverside County Land Management Agency. 2023. Western riverside county multiple species habitat conservation plan. Available at: https://rctlma.org/western-riverside-county-multiple-specieshabitat-conservation-plan-mshcp.

Riverside County Planning Department. 2021a. General Plan Amendments Summary. Available at:
https://planning.rctlma.org/sites/g/files/aldnop416/files/migrated/Portals-14-genplan-2021-GPARSLN-Cycles-2003-Current-Post-Online.pdf _____. 2021b. Elsinore Area Plan. Available at:
https://planning.rctlma.org/sites/g/files/aldnop416/files/migrated/Portals-14-genplan-GPA-2022- Compiled-ELAP-4-2022-rev.pdf
_____. 2015. Riverside County General Plan. Available at: Riverside County General Plan | Planning Department Riverside County (rctlma.org).

State Water Resources Control Board. 2021. State Policy for Water Quality Control: State Wetland Definition and Procedures for Discharges of Dredged or Fill Material to Waters of the State. Adopted April 2, 2020, and revised April 6, 2021.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2008. A Field Guide to the Identification of the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) in the Arid West Region of the Western United States. ERDC/CRREL TR-08-

12. Hanover, NH: Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory and U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
1300
Biological Resources Assessment
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
124 November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2023a. USFWS Resource Report List. Information for Planning and Conservation. Available https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac. Accessed October 2023. _______. 2023b. National Wetland Inventory. Available at:
https://fwsprimary.wim.usgs.gov/wetlands/apps/wetlands-mapper/. Accessed October 2023. _______. 2023c. Online Critical Habitat Mapper. Available at:
https://fws.maps.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=9d8de5e265ad4fe09893cf75b 8dbfb77. Accessed October 2023.
____. 1918. Migratory bird treaty act of 1918. Section 16 of the U.S. Code (703-712), as amended 1989. 1301

LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A – Biological Resources Recommendations Flow Charts Appendix B – 2024 MSHCP Fee Schedule
Appendix C – SKR Plan Area
Appendix D – Literature Review And Database Results
1302

APPENDIX A
Biological Resources Recommendations Flow Charts
1303
Appendix A – Bio Recommendations Flow Charts
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Wildomar General Plan Update
A-1

FLOW CHART TO GUIDE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS
Does your property occur
within a Criteria Cell? (Visit
https://www.wrcrca.org/rcamaps/)
Yes
Habitat Evaluation
and Negotiation
Strategy (HANS)
application
submitted
HANS determination
made
Property needed
for reserve
assembly
100% of property
Initiate Joint
Project Review
(JPR)*
RCA agrees with
permitee
Refer to
HANS
Aquisition
flow chart**
Complete HANS,
JPR, CEQA, and
project approval
RCA disagrees
with permitee
Refer to
HANS
Aquisition
flow chart**
Complete HANS,
JPR, CEQA, and
project approval
Portion of
property
Applicant fulfills
MSHCP
requirements for
studies/analysis
Initiate JPR with
RCA*
Permitee receives
MSHCP findings
from RCA and
Wildlife Agencies
Complete HANS,
JPR, CEQA, and
project approval
Property not
needed for
reserve assembly
Applicant fulfills
MSHCP
requirements for
studies/analysis
Initiates JPR with
RCA*
Permitee receives
MSHCP findings
from RCA and
Wildlife Agencies
Complete HANS,
JPR, CEQA, and
project approval
No HANS is not required
Is a Determination
of Biologically
Equivalent or
Superior
Preservation
(DBESP) needed?
Yes
Applicant fulfills
MSHCP
requirements for
studies/analysis
City/Riverside
County and
Wildlife
Agencies review
DBESP
No
Applicant fulfills
MSHCP
requirements for
studies/analysis
** https://www.wrc-rca.org/wpcontent/uploads/2022/04/HANS_acquisi tion_flow_chart_v3.pdf
* https://www.wrc-rca.org/wpcontent/uploads/2022/11/0722_J PR_Flow_Chart_NEW.pdf
November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
1304
Appendix A – Bio Recommendations Flow Charts
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Wildomar General Plan Update
A-2

FLOW CHART BASED ON PROJECT ACTION
Project is discretionary or ministerial action?
Project is discretionary action Refer to "Flow Chart to Guide Development Actions"
Project is ministerial action
Work with the City/Riverside County to ensure action
has lowest environmental impact possible (i.e.,
Expedited Review Process)
November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
1305
Appendix A – Bio Recommendations Flow Charts
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Wildomar General Plan Update
A-3

FLOW CHART TO GUIDE SPECIAL-STATUS WILDLIFE (AMPHIBIANS) RECOMMENDATIONS If a project falls within a
mapped survey area for
amphibian species (arroyo
toad, California red-legged
frog, and mountain
yelllow-legged frog),
conduct site assessment to
determine if there is
suitable habitat for these
species to occur within
action area (WLD-1)
Suitable habitat for specialstatus amphibians is present.

Conduct focused surveys in
accordance with accepted
survey protocols prior to
implementation of action
(WLD-1).

Special-status amphibians
found within action area.

The action cannot avoid
(permanent or temporary)
at least 90% of the occupied
portion of the property.

Prepare a DBESP Report.

The action will avoid
(permanent or temporary)
at least 90% of the occupied
portion of the property.

Develop and implement
appropriate Best
Management Practices to
ensure impacts remain less
than significant.

No special-status
amphibians found within
action area.

No further actions
recommended.

Suitable habitat for specialstatus amphibians is absent.

Include a statement that no
suitable habitat is present
on the project site
supported with solid
evidence and no further
measures are
recommended.

November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
1306
Appendix A – Bio Recommendations Flow Charts
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Wildomar General Plan Update
A-4

FLOW CHART TO GUIDE BURROWING OWL RECOMMENDATIONS
If a project falls within a
mapped survey area for
burrowing owl, conduct
site assessment to
determine if there is
suitable habitat for this
species to occur within
action area (WLD-2)
Suitable habitat for
burrowing owl is present.

Conduct focused surveys in
accordance with the
MSHCP Burrowing Owl
Survey Instructions prior to
implementation of action
(WLD-2).

Burrowing owl found within
action area.

The action cannot avoid
(permanent or temporary)
at least 90% of the occupied
portion of the property.

Prepare a DBESP Report and
Burrowing Owl Protection
and Relocation Plan.

The action will avoid
(permanent or temporary)
at least 90% of the occupied
portion of the property.

Develop and implement
appropriate Best
Management Practices to
ensure impacts remain less
than significant.

Burrowing owl not found
within action area.

Conduct pre-construction
survey for burrowing owl no
more than 30 days prior to
initiation of ground
disturbance.

Suitable habitat for
burrowing owl is absent.

Include a statement that no
suitable habitat is present
on the project site
supported with solid
evidence and no further
measures are
recommended.

November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
1307
Appendix A – Bio Recommendations Flow Charts
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Wildomar General Plan Update
A-5

FLOW CHART TO GUIDE DELHI SANDS FLOWER-LOVING FLY RECOMMENDATIONS If a project falls within an
area with Delhi soils
mapped using the MSHCP
baseline data, conduct site
assessment to determine if
there is suitable habitat for
this species to occur within
action area (WLD-3)
Suitable habitat for Delhi
Sands flower-loving fly
(DSFLF) is present.

Conduct two years of
focused surveys in
accordance with accepted
USFWS survey protocols
prior to implementation of
action (WLD-3).

DSFLF found within action
area.

The action cannot avoid
(permanent or temporary)
DSFLF.

Prepare a DBESP Report and
75% of mapped Delhi soils
on the project site must be
conserved.

The action will avoid
(permanent or temporary)
DSFLF.

Develop and implement
appropriate Best
Management Practices to
ensure impacts remain less
than significant.

DSFLF not found within
action area.

No further actions
recommended.

Suitable habitat for DSFLF is
absent.

Include a statement that no
suitable habitat is present
on the project site
supported with solid
evidence and no further
measures are
recommended.

November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
1308
Appendix A – Bio Recommendations Flow Charts
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Wildomar General Plan Update
A-6

FLOW CHART TO GUIDE VERNAL POOLS AND FAIRY SHRIMP RECOMMENDATIONS If a project has the
potential to impact vernal
pools and fairy shrimp,
conduct site assessment to
determine if there is
suitable habitat for these
species to occur within
action area (WLD-4)
Suitable habitat for vernal
pools and fairy shrimp is
present.

Conduct focused surveys
pursuant to USFWS Survey
Guidelines for Listed Large
Branchiopods prior to
implementation of action
(WLD-4).

Fairy shrimp species are
found within action area.

The action cannot avoid
(permanent or temporary)
at least 90% of the occupied
portion of the property.

Prepare a DBESP Report.

The action will avoid
(permanent or temporary)
at least 90% of the occupied
portion of the property.

Develop and implement
appropriate Best
Management Practices to
ensure impacts remain less
than significant.

Fairy shrimp species are not
found within action area.

No further actions
recommended.

Suitable habitat for vernal
pools and fairy shrimp is
absent.

Include a statement that no
suitable habitat is present
on the project site
supported with solid
evidence and no further
measures are
recommended.

November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
1309
Appendix A – Bio Recommendations Flow Charts
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Wildomar General Plan Update
A-7

FLOW CHART TO GUIDE RIPARIAN BIRD SPECIES RECOMMENDATIONS If a project has the
potential to impact riparian
bird species (least Bell's
vireo, southwestern willow
flycatcher, yellow-billed
cuckoo), conduct site
assessment to determine if
there is suitable habitat for
these species to occur
within action area (WLD-5)
Suitable habitat for riparian
bird species is present.

Conduct focused surveys in
accordance with accepted
USFWS survey protocols
prior to implementation of
action (WLD-5).

Riparian bird species found
within action area.

If least Bell's vireo found,
the action cannot avoid
(permanent or temporary)
at least 90% of the occupied
portion of the property.

Prepare a DBESP Report.

If southwestern willow
flycatcher or yelllow-billed
cuckoo found, if the action
cannot demonstrate 100%
conservation of the
property.

Prepare a DBESP Report.

Riparian bird species not
found within action area.

No further actions
recommended.

Suitable habitat for riparian
bird species is absent.

Include a statement that no
suitable habitat is present
on the project site
supported with solid
evidence and no further
measures are
recommended.

November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
1310
Appendix A – Bio Recommendations Flow Charts
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Wildomar General Plan Update
A-8

FLOW CHART TO GUIDE COASTAL CALIFORNIA GNATCATCHER RECOMMENDATIONS If a project has the potential to
impact coastal California
gnatcatcher, conduct site
assessment to determine if there
is suitable habitat for this species
to occur within action area
(WLD-6)
Suitable habitat for California
gnatcatcher is present.

Avoid clearing, grubbing, grading,
and associated construction
actions in gnatcatcher occupied
habitat within Criteria Cells
and/or PQP lands between March
1 and August 15.

If this species is present and
habitat cannot be avoided.

Habitat cannot be removed from
March 1 to August 15 unless
focused surveys are conducted to
prove absence.

No further actions recommended.

Suitable habitat for California
gnatcatcher is absent.

Include a statement that no
suitable habitat is present on the
project site supported with solid
evidence and no further
measures are recommended.

November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
1311
Appendix A – Bio Recommendations Flow Charts
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Wildomar General Plan Update
A-9

FLOW CHART TO GUIDE SPECIAL-STATUS WILDLIFE (INCLUDING PROTECTED BIRDS/NESTS) RECOMMENDATIONS Conduct site assessment to
determine if there is
potential for protected
birds/nests to occur within
action area (BRD-1)
Special-status wildlife
and/or protected
birds/nests have potential
to occur in action area and
may be impacted by the
action.

Conduct pre-construction
nesting bird survey within
all suitable habitat within 3
days prior to
implementation of action.

Protected birds/nests are
determined to be present.

The action may result in
significant impacts.

Develop and implement
appropriate avoidance and
minimization measures (in
consultation with CDFW
for State-regulated wildlife
and USFWS for federally
listed wildlife and critical
habitat).

The action will not result in
significant impacts.

Develop and implement
appropriate avoidance and
minimization measures to
ensure impacts remain less
than significant.

Protected birds/nests are
determined to be absent.

No further action is
recommended,
construction may begin. If
site conditions change or
construction is delayed,
return to beginning of this
flow chart.

Protected birds/nests do
not have potential to occur
in action area and/or will
not be impacted by the
action.

No further action is
recommended,
construction may begin. If
site conditions change,
return to beginning of this
flow chart.

November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
1312
Appendix A – Bio Recommendations Flow Charts
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Wildomar General Plan Update
A-10

FLOW CHART TO GUIDE RIPARIAN HABITAT/RIVERINE AREAS AND VERNAL POOLS Conduct site
assessment to
determine if there is
riparian habitat/riverine
areas and/or vernal
pools within action
area (VEG-1).

Riparian/riverine habitat
and/or vernal pools are
present and may be
impacted by the action.

Map riparian/riverine habitat,
and/or vernal pools within the
action area and determine if
they will be impacted by the
action.

Riparian/riverine
habitat and/or vernal
pools will be impacted
by the action.

Develop and
implement appropriate
AMMs.

The action will impact
riparian/riverine habitat.

Obtain a Streambed
Alteration Agreement
from CDFW. AMMs will
be developed during
that process (RIP-1).

Prepare a DBESP
Report.

Riparian/riverine habitat
and/or vernal pools
won't be impacted by
the action.

Develop and
implement appropriate
avoidance measures to
ensure no inadvertent
impacts occur to
avoided vegetation. If
site conditions change,
return to beginning of
this flow chart.

Riparian/riverine
habitat and/or vernal
pools are absent.

No further action
recommended. If site
conditions change,
return to beginning of
this flow chart.

November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
1313
Appendix A – Bio Recommendations Flow Charts
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Wildomar General Plan Update
A-11

FLOW CHART TO GUIDE AQUATIC RESOURCES RECOMMENDATIONS
Conduct site
assessment to
determine if there
are aquatic
resources within
action area
(WTR1).

Aquatic resources
are present.

Conduct aquatic
resources
delineation per
USACE
requirements
(WTR2).

Potentially
regulated aquatic
resources are
present and may be
impacted by the
Project.

Submit aquatic
resources
delineation to
USACE and obtain
an AJD or PJD.

Waters regulated by
the USACE may be
impacted.

Obtain applicable
federal and State
permits prior to fill
of Waters of the
U.S. AMMs will be
developed during
that process.

Waters not
regulated by the
USACE may be
impacted.

Obtain applicable
State permits prior
to fill of Waters of
the State. AMMs
will be developed
during that process.

Potentially
regulated aquatic
resources are
absent and/or won't
be impacted by the
Project.

Develop and
implement
appropriate
avoidance
measures to ensure
no inadvertent
impacts occur to
avoided or offsite
aquatic resources.

Aquatic resources
are absent.

No additional
recommendations
unless conditions
change.

November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
1314
Appendix A – Bio Recommendations Flow Charts
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Wildomar General Plan Update
A-12

FLOW CHART TO GUIDE WILDLIFE CORRIDOR AND MOVEMENT PROTECTION RECOMMENDATIONS Conduct site assessment to
determine if wildlife movement,
movement corridors, or wildlife
nursery sites are within the action
area (WLD-7).

Wildlife movement, movement
corridors, or wildlife nursery sites are
present.

The action may result in significant
impacts.

Develop and implement appropriate
AMMs (in consultation with CDFW for
State-regulated wildlife and USFWS
for federally listed wildlife and critical
habitat).

The action will not result in significant
impacts.

Develop and implement appropriate
avoidance and minimization measures
to ensure impacts remain less than
significant.

Wildlife movement, movement
corridors, or wildlife nursery sites are
absent.

No additional recommendations
unless conditions change.

November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
1315
Appendix A – Bio Recommendations Flow Charts
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Wildomar General Plan Update
A-13

FLOW CHART TO GUIDE COVERED ROADS RECOMMENDATIONS
Does the project
occur within a Criteria
Cell?
Yes
Actions are considered
Covered Activities
within existing
Public/Quasi-Public
(PQP) Lands
Existing roads within
existing PQP Lands
Privately maintained
road
Refer to Appendix C of
the MSHCP* for AMMs.

Publicly maintained road Determine if actions are
Covered Activities**
Refer to Section 7.5.3
and Appendix C of the
MSHCP* for AMMs.

Planned roads within
existing PQP Lands
An equivalency analysis
shall be prepared by
either the permittee or
the entity requesting a
Certificate of Inclusion.

Alignment and design
subject to approval which
includes appropriate
environmental review
pursuant to CEQA.

Refer to Appendix C of
the MSHCP* for AMMs.

May include
construction of wildlife
crossings.

Actions are considered
Covered Activities within
Criteria Area
Existing roads within the
Criteria Area
Privately maintained
road
Maintenance activities
are subject to the
submittal of an
application for
Certificate of Inclusion
Refer to Section 7.5.3
and Appendix C of the
MSHCP* for AMMs.

Publicly maintained road Determine if actions are
Covered Activities**
Refer to Section 7.5.3
and Appendix C of the
MSHCP* for AMMs.

Planned roads within
the Criteria Area
The road is identified in
Table 7-4 of the MSHCP.

Yes Covered Activities. No
further steps required
No
An amendment to the
MSHCP in accordance
with the procedures
outlined in Section 6.10
of the MSHCP is
required.

No
Confirm consistency
with MSHCP policies
for projects outside
Criteria Areas
* https://rctlma.org/multiplespecies-habitat-conservation-planmshcp-volume-1-appendix-c ** https://rctlma.org/multiplespecies-habitat-conservationplan-mshcp-volume-1-section70 November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
1316
Appendix A – Bio Recommendations Flow Charts
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Wildomar General Plan Update
A-14

LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
Term Definition
AJD Approved Jurisdictional Delineation
AMMs Avoidance, Minimization, and Mitigation Measures
CDFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife
EFH Essential Fish Habitat
NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service
PJD Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation
RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board
USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service
November 2023 (Revised March 2024)
2022-077
1317

APPENDIX B
2024 MSHCP Fee Schedule
1318

WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY

MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN

LOCAL DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION FEE SCHEDULE FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2024
(Effective July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024)
Fee Category Fee
Residential, density less than 8.0 dwelling units per acre (fee per dwelling unit)
$4,236
Residential, density between 8.0 and 14.0 dwelling units per acre (fee per dwelling unit)
$1,766
Residential, density greater than 14.0 dwelling units per acre (fee per dwelling unit)
$781
Commercial (fee per acre) $19,066
Industrial (fee per acre) $19,066
1319

APPENDIX C
Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat (SKR) Plan Area
1320

DIAMOND VALLEY LAKE

LAKE ELSINORE
LAKE

MATHEWS

LAKE PERRIS
LAKE

SKINNER
VAIL
LAKE
CANYON
LAKE
LEE
LAKE
LAKE

RIVERSIDE
LAKE

NORCONIAN

SAN JACINTO
RIVER

SANTA ANA RIVER

SAN JACINTO RIVER

MOCKINGBIRD

CANYON LAKE
LITTLE
LAKE
LAKE
EVANS

LAKE FULMOR

CITY OF

MORENO VALLEY

CITY OF

CALIMESA

CITY OF

BANNING

CITY OF
NORCO

CITY OF

PERRIS CITY OF

SAN JACINTO

CITY OF

CITY OF CANYON LAKE

LAKE ELSINORE

CITY OF

WILDOMAR

CITY OF

MURRIETA

CITY OF

BEAUMONT

CITY OF

MENIFEE

CITY OF

TEMECULA

CITY OF

EASTVALE

CITY OF
CORONA

CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY

CITY OF
HEMET

CITY OF
RIVERSIDE 2
6 6
6 5
5 5
1 5
1 1
5 1
1 5
1 4
3 3
1 3
3 3
7 7
7 8
2 Map Source - County of Riverside, TLMA/GIS
Map Created By Vinnie Nguyen
\Projects\RCHCA\CRB_Project\mxds\SKR Plan Area (All)\SKRPlanArea_UpdatedVinnieNov142018.mxd Coordinate System: NAD83 State Plane VI FIPS0406 (Feet) Disclaimer: Maps and data are to be used for reference purposes only. Map features are approximate, and are not necessarily accurate to surveying or engineering standards. The County of Riverside makes no warranty or guarantee as to the content (the source is often third party), accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of any of the data provided, and assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. Any use of this product with respect to accuracy and precision shall be the sole responsibility of the user.

SKR CORE RESERVES
SKR HCP Boundary Modification - 06/2007

1. LAKE MATHEWS / ESTELLE MOUNTAIN

2. SYCAMORE CANYON

3. STEELE PEAK

4. MOTTE / RIMROCK

5. SAN JACINTO/LAKE PERRIS

6. POTRERO ACEC

7. SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY MULTI-SPECIES RESERVE

8. POTRERO RESERVE
NOT A
PART
NOT A
PART
´
SKR HCP Map Modification By Vinnie - 12/12/2018
?q
A»
%&h(
?q
!"a$
!"a$ %&h(
!"a$
Aª
Aª
A¦
A¦
!"`$
Aª
!"`$
AÀ
A¦
AÚ
0 1.5 3 6 9 12
Miles
County of Riverside Locator Map
Major Roads
Highways
SKR Plan Area
County of Riverside
Cities
Waterbodies Excluded From Core Reserve
1321

APPENDIX D
Literature Review and Database Results
1322
September 27, 2023
United States Department of the Interior

FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Carlsbad Fish And Wildlife Office
2177 Salk Avenue - Suite 250
Carlsbad, CA 92008-7385
Phone: (760) 431-9440 Fax: (760) 431-5901
In Reply Refer To:

Project Code: 2023-0134261
Project Name: City of Wildomar GP
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:

The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).

New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be completed by visiting the IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested through the IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.

The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or designated critical habitat.

A biological assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2) (c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological 1323
09/27/2023 2
evaluation similar to a biological assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended contents of a biological assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.

If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found at the Fish and Wildlife Service's Endangered Species Consultation website at:
https://www.fws.gov/service/esa-section-7-consultation
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to protect native birds from project-related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional, resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more information regarding these Acts, see https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-bird-permit/whatwe-do.

The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan (when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize the production of project-related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and their resources to the project-related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and recommended conservation measures, see https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/threats-birds.

In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/partner/council-conservationmigratory-birds.

We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit to our office.
1324
09/27/2023 3
▪
Attachment(s):

Official Species List

OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed action".

This species list is provided by:

Carlsbad Fish And Wildlife Office
2177 Salk Avenue - Suite 250
Carlsbad, CA 92008-7385
(760) 431-9440
1325
09/27/2023 4

PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code: 2023-0134261
Project Name: City of Wildomar GP
Project Type: Introduction
Project Description: The City is working on its first city-specific general plan.

Project Location:

The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:// www.google.com/maps/@33.6162489,-117.2559753331285,14z
Counties: Riverside County, California
1326
09/27/2023 5

1. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES
There is a total of 20 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.

Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list because a project could affect downstream species.

IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the Department of Commerce.

See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office if you have questions.

NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.

MAMMALS

NAME STATUS
San Bernardino Merriam's Kangaroo Rat Dipodomys merriami parvus There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2060
Endangered
Stephens' Kangaroo Rat Dipodomys stephensi (incl. D. cascus) No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3495
Threatened
1 1327
09/27/2023 6
BIRDS

NAME STATUS
Coastal California Gnatcatcher Polioptila californica californica There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location overlaps the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8178
Threatened
Least Bell's Vireo Vireo bellii pusillus
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5945
Endangered
Southwestern Willow Flycatcher Empidonax traillii extimus There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6749
Endangered
Western Snowy Plover Charadrius nivosus nivosus
Population: Pacific Coast population DPS-U.S.A. (CA, OR, WA), Mexico (within 50 miles of Pacific coast)
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8035
Threatened

AMPHIBIANS

NAME STATUS
Arroyo (=arroyo Southwestern) Toad Anaxyrus californicus There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3762
Endangered
California Red-legged Frog Rana draytonii
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2891
Threatened

INSECTS

NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Candidate
Quino Checkerspot Butterfly Euphydryas editha quino (=E. e. wrighti) There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5900
Endangered
1328
09/27/2023 7

CRUSTACEANS

NAME STATUS
Riverside Fairy Shrimp Streptocephalus woottoni
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8148
Endangered
Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp Branchinecta lynchi
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/498
Threatened

FLOWERING PLANTS

NAME STATUS
California Orcutt Grass Orcuttia californica
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4923
Endangered
Munz's Onion Allium munzii
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2951
Endangered
San Diego Ambrosia Ambrosia pumila
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8287
Endangered
San Diego Button-celery Eryngium aristulatum var. parishii No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5937
Endangered
San Jacinto Valley Crownscale Atriplex coronata var. notatior There is final critical habitat for this species. However, no actual acres or miles were designated due to exemptions or exclusions. See Federal Register publication for details.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4353
Endangered
Slender-horned Spineflower Dodecahema leptoceras
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4007
Endangered
Spreading Navarretia Navarretia fossalis
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1334
Threatened
Thread-leaved Brodiaea Brodiaea filifolia
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6087
Threatened

CRITICAL HABITATS
There is 1 critical habitat wholly or partially within your project area under this office's jurisdiction.
1329
09/27/2023 8

NAME STATUS
Coastal California Gnatcatcher Polioptila californica californica https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8178#crithab
Final
1330
09/27/2023 9

IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION
Agency: ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Name: Corrina Tapia
Address: 215 N 5th Street
City: Redlands
State: CA
Zip: 92374
Email [email protected]
Phone: 9092552983
1331
10/4/23, 10:33 AM Print View
https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/rarefind/view/QuickElementListView.html 1/6 Query Summary:

Quad IS (Wildomar (3311753) OR Murrieta (3311752) OR Romoland (3311762) OR Lake Elsinore (3311763)) Print Close
CNDDB Element Query Results
Scientific
Name
Common
Name
Taxonomic
Group
Element
Code
Total
Occs
Returned
Occs
Federal
Status
State
Status
Global
Rank
State
Rank
CA
Rare
Plant
Rank
Other
Status Habitats
Abronia villosa var.
aurita
chaparral
sand-verbena Dicots PDNYC010P1 98 1 None None G5T2? S2 1B.1 BLM_S-Sensitive,
SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden, USFS_SSensitive
Chaparral,
Coastal scrub,
Desert dunes
Accipiter cooperii Cooper's
hawk Birds ABNKC12040 118 4 None None G5 S4 null
CDFW_WL-Watch
List, IUCN_LCLeast Concern
Cismontane
woodland,
Riparian forest,
Riparian
woodland,
Upper montane
coniferous forest
Aimophila ruficeps
canescens
southern
California
rufouscrowned
sparrow
Birds ABPBX91091 235 20 None None G5T3 S4 null CDFW_WL-Watch List
Chaparral,
Coastal scrub
Allium marvinii Yucaipa onion Monocots PMLIL02330 47 2 None None G1 S1 1B.2 BLM_S-Sensitive,
SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden, USFS_SSensitive
Chaparral
Allium munzii Munz's onion Monocots PMLIL022Z0 21 8 Endangered Threatened G1 S1 1B.1 SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden
Chaparral,
Cismontane
woodland,
Coastal scrub,
Pinon & juniper
woodlands,
Valley & foothill
grassland
Almutaster
pauciflorus
alkali marsh
aster Dicots PDASTEL010 7 1 None None G4 S1S2 2B.2
SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden
Meadow & seep
Ambrosia pumila San Diego
ambrosia Dicots PDAST0C0M0 61 3 Endangered None G1 S1 1B.1 SB_CRES-San
Diego Zoo CRES
Native Gene Seed
Bank
Chaparral,
Coastal scrub,
Valley & foothill
grassland
Anaxyrus
californicus arroyo toad Amphibians AAABB01230 139 1 Endangered None G2G3 S2 null CDFW_SSCSpecies of Special
Concern,
IUCN_ENEndangered
Desert wash,
Riparian scrub,
Riparian
woodland, South
coast flowing
waters, South
coast standing
waters
Anniella stebbinsi
Southern
California
legless lizard
Reptiles ARACC01060 426 3 None None G3 S3 null
CDFW_SSCSpecies of Special
Concern, USFS_SSensitive
Broadleaved
upland forest,
Chaparral,
Coastal dunes,
Coastal scrub
Aquila chrysaetos golden eagle Birds ABNKC22010 325 2 None None G5 S3 null BLM_S-Sensitive,
CDF_S-Sensitive,
CDFW_FP-Fully
Protected,
CDFW_WL-Watch
List, IUCN_LCLeast Concern
Broadleaved
upland forest,
Cismontane
woodland,
Coastal prairie,
Great Basin
grassland, Great
Basin scrub,
Lower montane
coniferous
forest, Pinon &
juniper
woodlands,
Upper montane
coniferous
forest, Valley &
foothill
grassland
1332
10/4/23, 10:33 AM Print View
https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/rarefind/view/QuickElementListView.html 2/6 Arctostaphylos
rainbowensis
Rainbow
manzanita Dicots PDERI042T0 89 15 None None G2 S2 1B.1
BLM_S-Sensitive,
SB_CRES-San
Diego Zoo CRES
Native Gene Seed
Bank, USFS_SSensitive
Chaparral,
Ultramafic
Arizona elegans
occidentalis
California
glossy snake Reptiles ARADB01017 260 6 None None G5T2 S2 null CDFW_SSCSpecies of Special
Concern
null
Artemisiospiza belli
belli Bell's sparrow Birds ABPBX97021 61 13 None None G5T2T3 S3 null CDFW_WL-WatchList Chaparral,
Coastal scrub
Aspidoscelis
hyperythra
orangethroated
whiptail
Reptiles ARACJ02060 369 26 None None G5 S2S3 null
CDFW_WL-Watch
List, IUCN_LCLeast Concern,
USFS_S-Sensitive
Chaparral,
Cismontane
woodland,
Coastal scrub
Aspidoscelis tigris
stejnegeri
coastal
whiptail Reptiles ARACJ02143 148 1 None None G5T5 S3 null CDFW_SSCSpecies of Special
Concern
null
Athene cunicularia burrowing owl Birds ABNSB10010 2011 35 None None G4 S2 null BLM_S-Sensitive,
CDFW_SSCSpecies of Special
Concern, IUCN_LCLeast Concern,
USFWS_BCC-Birds
of Conservation
Concern
Coastal prairie,
Coastal scrub,
Great Basin
grassland, Great
Basin scrub,
Mojavean desert
scrub, Sonoran
desert scrub,
Valley & foothill
grassland
Atriplex coronata
var. notatior
San Jacinto
Valley
crownscale
Dicots PDCHE040C2 16 1 Endangered None G4T1 S1 1B.1
SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden
Alkali playa,
Valley & foothill
grassland,
Vernal pool,
Wetland
Ayenia compacta California
ayenia Dicots PDSTE01020 74 1 None None G4 S3 2B.3
SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden
Desert wash,
Mojavean desert
scrub, Sonoran
desert scrub
Bombus crotchii Crotch
bumble bee Insects IIHYM24480 437 4 None CandidateEndangered G2 S2 null IUCN_ENEndangered null Bombus
pensylvanicus
American
bumble bee Insects IIHYM24260 225 3 None None G3G4 S2 null IUCN_VUVulnerable Coastal prairie,
Great Basin
grassland,
Valley & foothill
grassland
Branchinecta
lynchi
vernal pool
fairy shrimp Crustaceans ICBRA03030 796 2 Threatened None G3 S3 null IUCN_VUVulnerable Valley & foothill
grassland,
Vernal pool,
Wetland
Branchinecta
sandiegonensis
San Diego
fairy shrimp Crustaceans ICBRA03060 122 1 Endangered None G2 S1 null IUCN_ENEndangered Chaparral,
Coastal scrub,
Vernal pool,
Wetland
Brodiaea filifolia thread-leaved
brodiaea Monocots PMLIL0C050 141 6 Threatened Endangered G2 S2 1B.1 SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden, SB_CRESSan Diego Zoo
CRES Native Gene
Seed Bank
Chaparral,
Cismontane
woodland,
Coastal scrub,
Valley & foothill
grassland,
Vernal pool,
Wetland
Brodiaea
santarosae
Santa Rosa
Basalt
brodiaea
Monocots PMLIL0C0G0 12 8 None None G1 S1 1B.2 USFS_S-Sensitive Valley & foothill grassland
Buteo regalis ferruginous
hawk Birds ABNKC19120 107 2 None None G4 S3S4 null
CDFW_WL-Watch
List, IUCN_LCLeast Concern
Great Basin
grassland, Great
Basin scrub,
Pinon & juniper
woodlands,
Valley & foothill
grassland
Buteo swainsoni Swainson's
hawk Birds ABNKC19070 2561 1 None Threatened G5 S4 null BLM_S-Sensitive,
IUCN_LC-Least
Concern
Great Basin
grassland,
Riparian forest,
Riparian
woodland,
Valley & foothill
grassland
Calochortus weedii
var. intermedius
intermediate
mariposa-lily Monocots PMLIL0D1J1 197 3 None None G3G4T3 S3 1B.2 SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden, USFS_SSensitive
Chaparral,
Coastal scrub,
Valley & foothill
grassland
Centromadia
pungens ssp.
laevis
smooth
tarplant
Dicots PDAST4R0R4 137 33 None None G3G4T2 S2 1B.1 SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho Santa Ana Botanic
Garden
Alkali playa,
Chenopod
scrub, Meadow
& seep, Riparian
woodland,
1333
10/4/23, 10:33 AM Print View
https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/rarefind/view/QuickElementListView.html 3/6 Valley & foothill
grassland,
Wetland
Chaetodipus
californicus
femoralis
Dulzura
pocket mouse Mammals AMAFD05021 50 2 None None G5T3 S3 null null Chaparral,
Coastal scrub,
Valley & foothill
grassland
Chaetodipus fallax
fallax
northwestern
San Diego
pocket mouse
Mammals AMAFD05031 101 3 None None G5T3T4 S3S4 null null Chaparral, Coastal scrub
Charadrius nivosus
nivosus
western
snowy plover Birds ABNNB03031 138 1 Threatened None G3T3 S3 null CDFW_SSCSpecies of Special
Concern
Great Basin
standing waters,
Sand shore,
Wetland
Chorizanthe parryi
var. parryi
Parry's
spineflower Dicots PDPGN040J2 150 26 None None G3T2 S2 1B.1 BLM_S-Sensitive,
SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden, USFS_SSensitive
Chaparral,
Cismontane
woodland,
Coastal scrub,
Valley & foothill
grassland
Chorizanthe
polygonoides var.
longispina
long-spined
spineflower Dicots PDPGN040K1 166 37 None None G5T3 S3 1B.2 BLM_S-Sensitive,
SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden, SB_CRESSan Diego Zoo
CRES Native Gene
Seed Bank
Chaparral,
Coastal scrub,
Meadow & seep,
Ultramafic,
Valley & foothill
grassland,
Vernal pool
Cicindela senilis
frosti
senile tiger
beetle Insects IICOL02121 9 1 None None G2G3T1T3 S1 null null Mud shore/flats,Wetland Clinopodium
chandleri
San Miguel
savory
Dicots PDLAM08030 37 6 None None G2G3 S2 1B.2
BLM_S-Sensitive,
SB_CRES-San
Diego Zoo CRES
Native Gene Seed
Bank, USFS_SSensitive
Chaparral,
Cismontane
woodland,
Coastal scrub,
Riparian
woodland,
Ultramafic,
Valley & foothill
grassland
Crotalus ruber red-diamond
rattlesnake Reptiles ARADE02090 192 8 None None G4 S3 null CDFW_SSCSpecies of Special
Concern, IUCN_LCLeast Concern,
USFS_S-Sensitive
Chaparral,
Mojavean desert
scrub, Sonoran
desert scrub
Dipodomys
merriami parvus
San
Bernardino
kangaroo rat
Mammals AMAFD03143 81 3 Endangered Candidate
Endangered G5T1 S1 null
CDFW_SSCSpecies of Special
Concern
Coastal scrub
Dipodomys
stephensi
Stephens'
kangaroo rat Mammals AMAFD03100 226 44 Threatened Threatened G2 S3 null IUCN_VUVulnerable Coastal scrub,
Valley & foothill
grassland
Dodecahema
leptoceras
slenderhorned
spineflower
Dicots PDPGN0V010 42 1 Endangered Endangered G1 S1 1B.1 SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden
Chaparral,
Cismontane
woodland,
Coastal scrub
Dudleya
multicaulis
manystemmed
dudleya
Dicots PDCRA040H0 154 1 None None G2 S2 1B.2
SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden, USFS_SSensitive
Chaparral,
Coastal scrub,
Valley & foothill
grassland
Elanus leucurus white-tailed
kite Birds ABNKC06010 184 6 None None G5 S3S4 null
BLM_S-Sensitive,
CDFW_FP-Fully
Protected,
IUCN_LC-Least
Concern
Cismontane
woodland,
Marsh & swamp,
Riparian
woodland,
Valley & foothill
grassland,
Wetland
Emys marmorata western pond
turtle Reptiles ARAAD02030 1518 7 None None G3G4 S3 null BLM_S-Sensitive,
CDFW_SSCSpecies of Special
Concern,
IUCN_VUVulnerable,
USFS_S-Sensitive
Aquatic, Artificial
flowing waters,
Klamath/North
coast flowing
waters,
Klamath/North
coast standing
waters, Marsh &
swamp,
Sacramento/San
Joaquin flowing
waters,
Sacramento/San
Joaquin
standing waters,
South coast
flowing waters,
South coast
standing waters,
Wetland
Eremophila
alpestris actia
California
horned lark
Birds ABPAT02011 94 11 None None G5T4Q S4 null CDFW_WL-Watch List, IUCN_LCMarine intertidal& splash zone
1334
10/4/23, 10:33 AM Print View
https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/rarefind/view/QuickElementListView.html 4/6 Least Concern communities,
Meadow & seep
Eryngium
aristulatum var.
parishii
San Diego
button-celery Dicots PDAPI0Z042 83 3 Endangered Endangered G5T1 S1 1B.1 SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden, SB_CRESSan Diego Zoo
CRES Native Gene
Seed Bank
Coastal scrub,
Valley & foothill
grassland,
Vernal pool,
Wetland
Eumops perotis
californicus
western
mastiff bat Mammals AMACD02011 296 3 None None G4G5T4 S3S4 null BLM_S-Sensitive,
CDFW_SSCSpecies of Special
Concern
Chaparral,
Cismontane
woodland,
Coastal scrub,
Valley & foothill
grassland
Euphydryas editha
quino
quino
checkerspot
butterfly
Insects IILEPK405L 186 10 Endangered None G5T1T2 S1S2 null null Chaparral, Coastal scrub
Geothallus
tuberosus
Campbell's
liverwort Bryophytes NBHEP1C010 12 1 None None G2 S2 1B.1 IUCN_CR-CriticallyEndangered Coastal scrub,
Vernal pool,
Wetland
Gila orcuttii arroyo chub Fish AFCJB13120 49 1 None None G2 S2 null AFS_VUVulnerable,
CDFW_SSCSpecies of Special
Concern,
IUCN_VUVulnerable,
USFS_S-Sensitive
Aquatic, South
coast flowing
waters
Harpagonella
palmeri
Palmer's
grapplinghook Dicots PDBOR0H010 57 3 None None G4 S3 4.2 SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden, SB_CRESSan Diego Zoo
CRES Native Gene
Seed Bank
Chaparral,
Coastal scrub,
Valley & foothill
grassland
Hesperocyparis
forbesii
Tecate
cypress Gymnosperms PGCUP040C0 27 1 None None G2 S2 1B.1 BLM_S-Sensitive,
SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden, SB_CRESSan Diego Zoo
CRES Native Gene
Seed Bank,
SB_UCSC-UC
Santa Cruz,
SB_USDA-US Dept
of Agriculture,
USFS_S-Sensitive
Chaparral,
Closed-cone
coniferous forest
Icteria virens yellowbreasted chat Birds ABPBX24010 101 1 None None G5 S4 null CDFW_SSCSpecies of Special
Concern, IUCN_LCLeast Concern
Riparian forest,
Riparian scrub,
Riparian
woodland
Juncus luciensis Santa Lucia
dwarf rush Monocots PMJUN013J0 37 2 None None G3 S3 1B.2 BLM_S-Sensitive,USFS_S-Sensitive Chaparral, Great
Basin scrub,
Lower montane
coniferous
forest, Meadow
& seep, Vernal
pool, Wetland
Lanius
ludovicianus
loggerhead
shrike Birds ABPBR01030 110 2 None None G4 S4 null
CDFW_SSCSpecies of Special
Concern, IUCN_NTNear Threatened
Broadleaved
upland forest,
Desert wash,
Joshua tree
woodland,
Mojavean desert
scrub, Pinon &
juniper
woodlands,
Riparian
woodland,
Sonoran desert
scrub
Lasiurus xanthinus western
yellow bat Mammals AMACC05070 58 2 None None G4G5 S3 null CDFW_SSCSpecies of Special
Concern, IUCN_LCLeast Concern
Desert wash
Lasthenia glabrata
ssp. coulteri
Coulter's
goldfields Dicots PDAST5L0A1 111 7 None None G4T2 S2 1B.1 BLM_S-Sensitive,
SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden, SB_SBBGSanta Barbara
Botanic Garden
Alkali playa,
Marsh & swamp,
Salt marsh,
Vernal pool,
Wetland
Lepidium
virginicum var.
robinsonii
Robinson's
pepper-grass
Dicots PDBRA1M114 142 2 None None G5T3 S3 4.3 null Chaparral, Coastal scrub
Lepus californicus
bennettii
San Diego
black-tailed
Mammals AMAEB03051 103 16 None None G5T3T4 S3S4 null null Coastal scrub 1335
10/4/23, 10:33 AM Print View
https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/rarefind/view/QuickElementListView.html 5/6 jackrabbit
Lilium parryi lemon lily Monocots PMLIL1A0J0 160 1 None None G3 S3 1B.2 SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden, SB_CRESSan Diego Zoo
CRES Native Gene
Seed Bank,
USFS_S-Sensitive
Lower montane
coniferous
forest, Meadow
& seep, Riparian
forest, Upper
montane
coniferous
forest, Wetland
Limnanthes alba
ssp. parishii
Parish's
meadowfoam Dicots PDLIM02052 33 1 None Endangered G4T2 S2 1B.2 BLM_S-Sensitive,
SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden, SB_USDAUS Dept of
Agriculture,
USFS_S-Sensitive
Lower montane
coniferous
forest, Meadow
& seep, Vernal
pool, Wetland
Linderiella
occidentalis
California
linderiella Crustaceans ICBRA06010 508 2 None None G2G3 S2S3 null IUCN_NT-NearThreatened Vernal pool Linderiella
santarosae
Santa Rosa
Plateau fairy
shrimp
Crustaceans ICBRA06020 2 2 None None G1G2 S1 null null Vernal pool Monardella
hypoleuca ssp.
intermedia
intermediate
monardella Dicots PDLAM180A4 38 1 None None G4T2? S2? 1B.3 null Chaparral,
Cismontane
woodland,
Lower montane
coniferous forest
Myosurus minimus
ssp. apus
little
mousetail Dicots PDRAN0H031 24 3 None None G5T2Q S2 3.1 SB_CRES-San
Diego Zoo CRES
Native Gene Seed
Bank
Valley & foothill
grassland,
Vernal pool,
Wetland
Navarretia fossalis spreading
navarretia Dicots PDPLM0C080 82 11 Threatened None G2 S2 1B.1 SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden, SB_CRESSan Diego Zoo
CRES Native Gene
Seed Bank
Alkali playa,
Chenopod
scrub, Marsh &
swamp, Vernal
pool, Wetland
Navarretia
prostrata
prostrate
vernal pool
navarretia
Dicots PDPLM0C0Q0 61 3 None None G2 S2 1B.2 null
Coastal scrub,
Meadow & seep,
Valley & foothill
grassland,
Vernal pool,
Wetland
Onychomys
torridus ramona
southern
grasshopper
mouse
Mammals AMAFF06022 28 1 None None G5T3 S3 null
CDFW_SSCSpecies of Special
Concern
Chenopod scrub
Orcuttia californica California
Orcutt grass Monocots PMPOA4G010 39 9 Endangered Endangered G1 S1 1B.1 SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden, SB_CRESSan Diego Zoo
CRES Native Gene
Seed Bank
Vernal pool,
Wetland
Perognathus
longimembris
brevinasus
Los Angeles
pocket mouse Mammals AMAFD01041 70 2 None None G5T2 S1S2 null CDFW_SSCSpecies of Special
Concern
Coastal scrub
Phrynosoma
blainvillii
coast horned
lizard Reptiles ARACF12100 784 21 None None G4 S4 null
BLM_S-Sensitive,
CDFW_SSCSpecies of Special
Concern, IUCN_LCLeast Concern
Chaparral,
Cismontane
woodland,
Coastal bluff
scrub, Coastal
scrub, Desert
wash, Pinon &
juniper
woodlands,
Riparian scrub,
Riparian
woodland,
Valley & foothill
grassland
Plegadis chihi white-faced
ibis Birds ABNGE02020 20 1 None None G5 S3S4 null
CDFW_WL-Watch
List, IUCN_LCLeast Concern
Marsh & swamp,
Wetland
Polioptila
californica
californica
coastal
California
gnatcatcher
Birds ABPBJ08081 1087 55 Threatened None G4G5T3Q S2 null CDFW_SSCSpecies of Special
Concern
Coastal bluff
scrub, Coastal
scrub
Pseudognaphalium
leucocephalum
white rabbittobacco Dicots PDAST440C0 62 1 None None G4 S2 2B.2 null Chaparral,
Cismontane
woodland,
Coastal scrub,
Riparian
woodland
Rana draytonii California redlegged frogAmphibians AAABH01022 1692 1 Threatened None G2G3 S2S3 null CDFW_SSCSpecies of Special Concern,
IUCN_VUVulnerable
Aquatic, Artificial
flowing waters,
Artificial
standing waters,
Freshwater
1336
10/4/23, 10:33 AM Print View
https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/rarefind/view/QuickElementListView.html 6/6 marsh, Marsh &
swamp, Riparian
forest, Riparian
scrub, Riparian
woodland,
Sacramento/San
Joaquin flowing
waters,
Sacramento/San
Joaquin
standing waters,
South coast
flowing waters,
South coast
standing waters,
Wetland
Salvadora
hexalepis virgultea
coast patchnosed snake Reptiles ARADB30033 34 1 None None G5T4 S3 null CDFW_SSCSpecies of Special
Concern
Coastal scrub
Scutellaria
bolanderi ssp.
austromontana
southern
mountains
skullcap
Dicots PDLAM1U0A1 43 1 None None G4T3 S3 1B.2
SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden, USFS_SSensitive
Chaparral,
Cismontane
woodland,
Lower montane
coniferous forest
Sibaropsis
hammittii
Hammitt's
clay-cress Dicots PDBRA32010 7 2 None None G2 S2 1B.2
SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden, USFS_SSensitive
Chaparral,
Valley & foothill
grassland
Southern Coast
Live Oak Riparian
Forest
Southern
Coast Live
Oak Riparian
Forest
Riparian CTT61310CA 246 5 None None G4 S4 null null Riparian forest Southern
Cottonwood Willow
Riparian Forest
Southern
Cottonwood
Willow
Riparian
Forest
Riparian CTT61330CA 111 6 None None G3 S3.2 null null Riparian forest Southern Interior
Basalt Flow Vernal
Pool
Southern
Interior Basalt
Flow Vernal
Pool
Herbaceous CTT44310CA 9 9 None None G1 S1.2 null null Vernal pool, Wetland
Southern
Sycamore Alder
Riparian Woodland
Southern
Sycamore
Alder
Riparian
Woodland
Riparian CTT62400CA 230 8 None None G4 S4 null null Riparian woodland
Spea hammondii western
spadefoot Amphibians AAABF02020 1444 41 None None G2G3 S3S4 null BLM_S-Sensitive,
CDFW_SSCSpecies of Special
Concern, IUCN_NTNear Threatened
Cismontane
woodland,
Coastal scrub,
Valley & foothill
grassland,
Vernal pool,
Wetland
Sphaerocarpos
drewiae
bottle
liverwort Bryophytes NBHEP35030 23 3 None None G1 S1 1B.1 IUCN_ENEndangered Chaparral,
Coastal scrub
Streptocephalus
woottoni
Riverside
fairy shrimp Crustaceans ICBRA07010 83 11 Endangered None G1G2 S2 null IUCN_ENEndangered Coastal scrub,
Valley & foothill
grassland,
Vernal pool,
Wetland
Symphyotrichum
defoliatum
San
Bernardino
aster
Dicots PDASTE80C0 102 2 None None G2 S2 1B.2
SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden, SB_CRESSan Diego Zoo
CRES Native Gene
Seed Bank,
USFS_S-Sensitive
Cismontane
woodland,
Coastal scrub,
Lower montane
coniferous
forest, Marsh &
swamp,
Meadow & seep,
Valley & foothill
grassland
Taricha torosa Coast Range
newt Amphibians AAAAF02032 88 3 None None G4 S4 null
CDFW_SSCSpecies of Special
Concern
null
Thamnophis
hammondii
two-striped
gartersnake Reptiles ARADB36160 184 1 None None G4 S3S4 null BLM_S-Sensitive,
CDFW_SSCSpecies of Special
Concern, IUCN_LCLeast Concern,
USFS_S-Sensitive
Marsh & swamp,
Riparian scrub,
Riparian
woodland,
Wetland
Valley Needlegrass
Grassland
Valley
Needlegrass
Grassland
Herbaceous CTT42110CA 45 1 None None G3 S3.1 null null Valley & foothill grassland
Vireo bellii pusillus least Bell's
vireo Birds ABPBW01114 505 21 Endangered Endangered G5T2 S3 null null Riparian forest,
Riparian scrub,
Riparian
woodland
1337
10/4/23, 10:34 AM CNPS Rare Plant Inventory | Search Results https://rareplants.cnps.org/Search/result?frm=T&sl=1&quad=3311753:3311762:3311752:3311763:&elev=:m:o 1/5 Search Results
CNPS Rare Plant Inventory
56 matches found. Click on scientific name for details
Search Criteria: Quad is one of [3311753:3311762:3311752:3311763] ▲ SCIENTIFIC
NAME
COMMON

NAME FAMILY LIFEFORM

BLOOMING
PERIOD
FED
LIST
STATE
LIST
GLOBAL
RANK
STATE
RANK
CA
RARE
PLANT
RANK
CA

ENDEMIC
DATE

ADDED PHOTO
Abronia villosa var.
aurita
chaparral
sand-verbena
Nyctaginaceae annual herb (Jan)MarSepNone None G5T2? S2 1B.1 2001- 01-01
© 2011
Aaron E.

Sims
Allium marvinii Yucaipa onion Alliaceae perennial
bulbiferous herb
Apr-May None None G1 S1 1B.2 Yes 2001-
01-01
© 2013
Keir Morse
Allium munzii Munz's onion Alliaceae perennial
bulbiferous herb
Mar-May FE CT G1 S1 1B.1 Yes 1980-
01-01
© 2003
Guy Bruyea
Almutaster
pauciflorus
alkali marsh
aster
Asteraceae perennial herb Jun-Oct None None G4 S1S2 2B.2 2017- 03-14
© 2014
Richard
Spellenberg
Ambrosia pumila San Diego
ambrosia
Asteraceae perennial
rhizomatous
herb
Apr-Oct FE None G1 S1 1B.1 1974-
01-01
© 2010
Benjamin
Smith
Amsinckia
douglasiana
Douglas'
fiddleneck
Boraginaceae annual herb Mar-May None None G4 S4 4.2 Yes 2007- 08-20
© 2013
Chris
Winchell
Arctostaphylos
rainbowensis
Rainbow
manzanita
Ericaceae perennial
evergreen shrub
Dec-Mar None None G2 S2 1B.1 Yes 1994-
01-01 No Photo
Available
Atriplex coronata
var. notatior
San Jacinto
Valley
crownscale
Chenopodiaceae annual herb Apr-Aug FE None G4T1 S1 1B.1 Yes 1988- 01-01
© 2008
Larry Sward
Atriplex parishii Parish's
brittlescale
Chenopodiaceae annual herb Jun-Oct None None G1G2 S1 1B.1 1988- 01-01 No Photo
Available
1338
10/4/23, 10:34 AM CNPS Rare Plant Inventory | Search Results https://rareplants.cnps.org/Search/result?frm=T&sl=1&quad=3311753:3311762:3311752:3311763:&elev=:m:o 2/5 Ayenia compacta California
ayenia
Malvaceae perennial herb Mar-Apr None None G4 S3 2B.3 1974- 01-01 No Photo
Available
Brodiaea filifolia thread-leaved
brodiaea
Themidaceae perennial
bulbiferous herb
Mar-Jun FT CE G2 S2 1B.1 Yes 1974-
01-01
© 2016
Keir Morse
Brodiaea
santarosae
Santa Rosa
Basalt
brodiaea
Themidaceae perennial
bulbiferous herb
May-Jun None None G1 S1 1B.2 Yes 2008-
02-05
© 2021 W.

Juergen
Schrenk
Calochortus
catalinae
Catalina
mariposa lily
Liliaceae perennial
bulbiferous herb
(Feb)MarJunNone None G3G4 S3S4 4.2 Yes 1974-
01-01 No Photo
Available
Calochortus weedii
var. intermedius
intermediate
mariposa-lily
Liliaceae perennial
bulbiferous herb
May-Jul None None G3G4T3 S3 1B.2 Yes 1994-
01-01 No Photo
Available
Carex buxbaumii Buxbaum's
sedge
Cyperaceae perennial
rhizomatous
herb
Mar-Aug None None G5 S3 4.2 2001-
01-01
© 2008
Dean Wm.

Taylor,
Ph.D.

Caulanthus
simulans
Payson's
jewelflower
Brassicaceae annual herb (Feb)MarMay(Jun)None None G4 S4 4.2 Yes 1974- 01-01 No Photo
Available
Centromadia
pungens ssp. laevis
smooth
tarplant
Asteraceae annual herb Apr-Sep None None G3G4T2 S2 1B.1 Yes 1994- 01-01 No Photo
Available
Chorizanthe
leptotheca
Peninsular
spineflower
Polygonaceae annual herb May-Aug None None G3 S3 4.2 1994- 01-01 No Photo
Available
Chorizanthe parryi
var. parryi
Parry's
spineflower
Polygonaceae annual herb Apr-Jun None None G3T2 S2 1B.1 Yes 1994- 01-01
© 2012
Keir Morse
Chorizanthe
polygonoides var.
longispina
long-spined
spineflower
Polygonaceae annual herb Apr-Jul None None G5T3 S3 1B.2 1994- 01-01 No Photo
Available
Clinopodium
chandleri
San Miguel
savory
Lamiaceae perennial shrub Mar-Jul None None G2G3 S2 1B.2 1974- 01-01 No Photo
Available
Convolvulus
simulans
smallflowered
morning-glory
Convolvulaceae annual herb Mar-Jul None None G4 S4 4.2 1994- 01-01 No Photo
Available
1339
10/4/23, 10:34 AM CNPS Rare Plant Inventory | Search Results https://rareplants.cnps.org/Search/result?frm=T&sl=1&quad=3311753:3311762:3311752:3311763:&elev=:m:o 3/5 Deinandra
paniculata
paniculate
tarplant
Asteraceae annual herb (Mar)AprNovNone None G4 S4 4.2 2001- 01-01 No Photo
Available
Dodecahema
leptoceras
slenderhorned
spineflower
Polygonaceae annual herb Apr-Jun FE CE G1 S1 1B.1 Yes 1980- 01-01 No Photo
Available
Dudleya
multicaulis
manystemmed
dudleya
Crassulaceae perennial herb Apr-Jul None None G2 S2 1B.2 Yes 1974- 01-01 No Photo
Available
Eryngium
aristulatum var.
parishii
San Diego
button-celery
Apiaceae annual/perennial
herb
Apr-Jun FE CE G5T1 S1 1B.1 1974-
01-01 No Photo
Available
Erythranthe diffusa Palomar
monkeyflower
Phrymaceae annual herb Apr-Jun None None G4 S3 4.3 1974- 01-01
Ron
Vanderhoff,
2019
Geothallus
tuberosus
Campbell's
liverwort
Sphaerocarpaceae ephemeral
liverwort
None None G2 S2 1B.1 Yes 2001-
01-01
© 2023
Nathan
Taylor
Harpagonella
palmeri
Palmer's
grapplinghook
Boraginaceae annual herb Mar-May None None G4 S3 4.2 1980- 01-01
© 2015
Keir Morse
Hesperocyparis
forbesii
Tecate cypress Cupressaceae perennial
evergreen tree
None None G2 S2 1B.1 1974-
01-01
© 2011
Joey
Malone
Holocarpha virgata
ssp. elongata
graceful
tarplant
Asteraceae annual herb May-Nov None None G5T3 S3 4.2 Yes 1994- 01-01
© 2013
Anna
Bennett
Hordeum
intercedens
vernal barley Poaceae annual herb Mar-Jun None None G3G4 S3S4 3.2 1994- 01-01 No Photo
Available
Juglans californica Southern
California
black walnut
Juglandaceae perennial
deciduous tree
Mar-Aug None None G4 S4 4.2 Yes 1994-
01-01
© 2020
Zoya
Akulova
Juncus acutus ssp.
leopoldii
southwestern
spiny rush
Juncaceae perennial
rhizomatous
herb
(Mar)MayJunNone None G5T5 S4 4.2 1988-
01-01
© 2019
Belinda Lo
1340
10/4/23, 10:34 AM CNPS Rare Plant Inventory | Search Results https://rareplants.cnps.org/Search/result?frm=T&sl=1&quad=3311753:3311762:3311752:3311763:&elev=:m:o 4/5 Juncus luciensis Santa Lucia
dwarf rush
Juncaceae annual herb Apr-Jul None None G3 S3 1B.2 Yes 2009- 04-30
© 2009
Keir Morse
Lasthenia glabrata
ssp. coulteri
Coulter's
goldfields
Asteraceae annual herb Feb-Jun None None G4T2 S2 1B.1 1994- 01-01
© 2013
Keir Morse
Lathyrus splendens pride-ofCaliforniaFabaceae perennial herb Mar-Jun None None G4 S4 4.3 1974- 01-01
© 2012
Ron Clark
Lepidium
virginicum var.
robinsonii
Robinson's
pepper-grass
Brassicaceae annual herb Jan-Jul None None G5T3 S3 4.3 1994- 01-01
© 2015
Keir Morse
Lilium humboldtii
ssp. ocellatum
ocellated
Humboldt lily
Liliaceae perennial
bulbiferous herb
MarJul(Aug)None None G4T4? S4? 4.2 Yes 1980-
01-01
© 2008
Thomas
Stoughton
Lilium parryi lemon lily Liliaceae perennial
bulbiferous herb
Jul-Aug None None G3 S3 1B.2 1974-
01-01
© 2009
Thomas
Stoughton
Limnanthes alba
ssp. parishii
Parish's
meadowfoam
Limnanthaceae annual herb Apr-Jun None CE G4T2 S2 1B.2 Yes 1974- 01-01
© 2005
Christopher
L. Christie
Microseris
douglasii ssp.
platycarpha
smallflowered
microseris
Asteraceae annual herb Mar-May None None G4T4 S4 4.2 2001- 01-01
© 2015
Richard
Spellenberg
Monardella
hypoleuca ssp.
intermedia
intermediate
monardella
Lamiaceae perennial
rhizomatous
herb
Apr-Sep None None G4T2? S2? 1B.3 Yes 2012-
10-16
© 2016
Ron
Vanderhoff
Myosurus minimus
ssp. apus
little mousetail Ranunculaceae annual herb Mar-Jun None None G5T2Q S2 3.1 1980- 01-01 No Photo
Available
Navarretia fossalis spreading
navarretia
Polemoniaceae annual herb Apr-Jun FT None G2 S2 1B.1 1980- 01-01 No Photo
Available
1341
10/4/23, 10:34 AM CNPS Rare Plant Inventory | Search Results https://rareplants.cnps.org/Search/result?frm=T&sl=1&quad=3311753:3311762:3311752:3311763:&elev=:m:o 5/5 Navarretia
prostrata
prostrate
vernal pool
navarretia
Polemoniaceae annual herb Apr-Jul None None G2 S2 1B.2 Yes 2001- 01-01 No Photo
Available
Orcuttia californica California
Orcutt grass
Poaceae annual herb Apr-Aug FE CE G1 S1 1B.1 1974-
01-01 No Photo
Available
Pseudognaphalium
leucocephalum
white rabbittobaccoAsteraceae perennial herb (Jul)AugNov(Dec)None None G4 S2 2B.2 2006- 11-03 No Photo
Available
Quercus
engelmannii
Engelmann
oak
Fagaceae perennial
deciduous tree
Mar-Jun None None G3 S3 4.2 1988-
01-01 No Photo
Available
Rhinotropis
cornuta var. fishiae
Fish's milkwort Polygalaceae perennial
deciduous shrub
May-Aug None None G5T4 S4 4.3 1974-
01-01 No Photo
Available
Romneya coulteri Coulter's
matilija poppy
Papaveraceae perennial
rhizomatous
herb
MarJul(Aug)None None G4 S4 4.2 1974-
01-01 No Photo
Available
Scutellaria
bolanderi ssp.
austromontana
southern
mountains
skullcap
Lamiaceae perennial
rhizomatous
herb
Jun-Aug None None G4T3 S3 1B.2 Yes 1994-
01-01 No Photo
Available
Sibaropsis
hammittii
Hammitt's
clay-cress
Brassicaceae annual herb Mar-Apr None None G2 S2 1B.2 Yes 2001- 01-01 No Photo
Available
Sphaerocarpos
drewiae
bottle
liverwort
Sphaerocarpaceae ephemeral
liverwort
None None G1 S1 1B.1 Yes 2001-
01-01 No Photo
Available
Symphyotrichum
defoliatum
San
Bernardino
aster
Asteraceae perennial
rhizomatous
herb
Jul-Nov None None G2 S2 1B.2 Yes 2004-
01-01 No Photo
Available
Viguiera laciniata San Diego
County
viguiera
Asteraceae perennial shrub FebJun(Aug)None None G4 S4 4.3 1974- 01-01 No Photo
Available
Showing 1 to 56 of 56 entries
Suggested Citation:

California Native Plant Society, Rare Plant Program. 2023. Rare Plant Inventory (online edition, v9.5). Website https://www.rareplants.cnps.org [accessed 4 October 2023].
1342

CITY OF WILDOMAR PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DRAFT EIR

CITY OF WILDOMAR
Appendices
May 2024
Appendix 5.5-1 Cultural Resources Assessment
1343

CITY OF WILDOMAR PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DRAFT EIR

CITY OF WILDOMAR
Appendices
PlaceWorks
This page intentionally left blank.
1344
2022-077/City of Wildomar General Plan Update
2525 Warren Drive ● Rocklin, CA 95677 ● Tel: (916) 782-9100 ● Fax: (916) 782-9134 ● www.ecorpconsulting.com October 27, 2023
PlaceWorks, Inc.
750 B Street, Suite 1620
San Diego, CA 92101
RE: Cultural Resources Assessment for City of Wildomar General Plan Update, Riverside County, California
Greetings:

At the request of PlaceWorks, Inc., ECORP Consulting, Inc. conducted a cultural resources assessment to provide a summary of known cultural resources and provide potential mitigation measure recommendations as part of the City of Wildomar General Plan Update. The planning area consists of approximately 15,165 acres (hereinafter, referred to as the Study Area). ECORP conducted a records search to determine the number, type, and significance of recorded cultural resources and potential cultural resources that future development within the planning area could potentially impact.

REGULATORY SETTING
National Historic Preservation Act
The federal law that covers cultural resources that could be affected by federal undertakings is the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966, as amended. Section 106 of the NHPA requires that federal agencies take into account the effects of a federal undertaking on properties listed in or eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The agencies must afford the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) a reasonable opportunity to comment on the undertaking. A federal undertaking is defined in 36 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 800.16(y) as:

A federal undertaking means a project, activity, or program funded in whole or in part under the direct or indirect jurisdiction of a federal agency, including those carried out by or on behalf of a federal agency; those carried out with Federal financial assistance; and those requiring a Federal permit, license, or approval.

The regulations that stipulate the procedures for complying with Section 106 are in 36 CFR 800. The Section 106 regulations require:
 definition of an Area of Potential Effect (APE);
 identification of cultural resources within the APE;
 evaluation of the identified resources in the APE using NRHP eligibility criteria;  determination of whether the effects of the undertaking or project on eligible resources will be adverse; and
 agreement on and implementation of efforts to resolve adverse effects, if necessary. 1345
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
2 October 27, 2023
2022-077
The federal agency must seek comment from the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and, in some cases, the ACHP, for its determinations of eligibility, effects, and proposed mitigation measures. Section 106 procedures for a specific project can be modified by negotiation of a Memorandum of Agreement or Programmatic Agreement between the federal agency, the SHPO, and, in some cases, the project proponent.

Effects to a cultural resource are potentially adverse if the lead federal agency, with the SHPO’s concurrence, determines the resource eligible for the NRHP, making it a Historic Property, and if application of the Criteria of Adverse Effects (36 CFR 800.5[a][2] et seq.) results in the conclusion that the effects will be adverse. The NRHP eligibility criteria, contained in 36 CFR 63, are as follows:

The quality of significance in American history, architecture, archaeology, and culture is present in districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects of state and local importance that possess aspects of integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, association, and
a) that are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or
b) that are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or c) that embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or
d) that have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.

In addition, the resource must be at least 50 years old, barring exceptional circumstances (36 CFR 60.4).

Resources that are eligible for, or listed on, the NRHP are historic properties.

Regulations implementing Section 106 of the NHPA (36 CFR 800.5) require that the federal agency, in consultation with the SHPO, apply the Criteria of Adverse Effect to historic properties within the APE.

According to 36 CFR 800.5(a)(1):

An adverse effect is found when an undertaking may alter, directly or indirectly, any of the characteristics of a historic property that qualify the property for inclusion in the National Register in a manner that would diminish the integrity of the property’s location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling or association.

California Environmental Quality Act
The California Environmental Quality Act is the state law that applies to a project’s impacts on cultural resources. A project is an activity that may cause a direct or indirect physical change in the environment and that is undertaken or funded by a state or local agency, or requires a permit, license, or lease from a 1346
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update 3 October 27, 20232022-077 state or local agency. CEQA requires that impacts to Historical Resources be identified and, if the impacts will be significant, then apply mitigation measures to reduce the impacts.

A Historical Resource is a resource that 1) is listed in or has been determined eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) by the State Historical Resources Commission, or has been determined historically significant by the CEQA lead agency because it meets the eligibility criteria for the CRHR; 2) is included in a local register of historical resources, as defined in Public Resources Code (PRC) 5020.1(k); or 3), and has been identified as significant in a historical resources survey, as defined in PRC 5024.1(g) (California Code of Regulations [CCR] Title 14, Section 15064.5(a)).

The eligibility criteria for the CRHR are as follows (CCR Title 14, Section 4852(b)):

1. It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history, or the cultural heritage of California or the U.S.;

2. It is associated with the lives of persons important to local, California, or national history;

3. It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master or possesses high artistic values; or

4. It has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California, or the nation.

In addition, the resource must retain integrity, which is evaluated with regard to the retention of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association (CCR Title 14, Section 4852(c)). Resources that have been determined eligible for the NRHP are automatically eligible for the CRHR.

Impacts to a Historical Resource, as defined by CEQA (listed in an official historic inventory or survey or eligible for the CRHR), are significant if the resource is demolished or destroyed or if the characteristics that made the resource eligible are materially impaired (CCR Title 14, Section 15064.5(b)). Demolition or alteration of eligible buildings, structures, and features that they would no longer be eligible would result in a significant impact. Whole or partial destruction of eligible archaeological sites would result in a significant impact. In addition to impacts from construction resulting in destruction or physical alteration of an eligible resource, impacts to the integrity of setting (sometimes termed visual impacts) of physical features in the project area could also result in significant impacts.

Riverside County Landmarks
The City of Wildomar is within the County of Riverside. To be eligible for consideration as a Riverside County Historic Landmark, a historic resource must be nominated through the following application and approval process:

A. Historical resources that may be considered by nomination include:
 Historical resources found as eligible for local, state, or national landmark status during CEQA cultural review.
 Historical resources found as eligible for local, state, or national landmark status during a historic resource survey.
1347
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
4 October 27, 2023
2022-077
 A historic resource or district already so designated under a municipal or county preservation or landmark ordinance. (Riverside County Historic Preservation Districts are established by a different set of criteria under Riverside County Ordinance 578 and are not established under the criteria and procedures contained in this document.)
 Nominations for historic resources not already having some level of landmark designation, or found to be eligible for such, will be reviewed under criteria established below in Section VI, Types of Historical Resources and Criteria for Listing.

The typology and criteria listed below are consistent with those developed by the California Office of Historic Preservation but have been modified for local application at the county level.

Types of resources eligible for nomination:
 Building: A resource, such as a house, barn, church, factory, hotel, or similar structure created principally to shelter or assist in carrying out any form of human activity.
 Site: A site is the location of a significant event, a prehistoric or historic occupation or activity, or a building or structure, whether standing, ruined, or vanished, where the location itself possessed historical, cultural, or archaeological value. A site need not be marked by physical remains if it is the location of a prehistoric or historic event. Nor is it required that a building, structure, or object marked the site at the time of it is historic significance, occupation, or activity.

Examples: trails, landscapes features, battlefields, habitation sites, Native American ceremonial areas, and rock art.
 Structure: The term “structure” is used to describe a construction made for a functional purpose rather than creating human shelter. Examples: mines, flumes, roads, bridges, and tunnels.
 Object: The term “object” is used to describe those constructions that are primarily artistic or commemorative in nature, relatively small in scale, and associated with a specific setting or environment. Objects that are located in museums are not eligible for landmark listing. Examples: fountains, monuments, maritime resources, sculptures, and boundary markers.
 Historic Districts: A geographic area designated as containing multiple historic resources that collectively have a special character or value—historical, cultural, architectural, archaeological, community, or aesthetic. A district must meet at least one of the criteria discussed below.
1348
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update 5 October 27, 20232022-077 To be considered a historic resource eligible for landmark listing, the resource must be at least 45 years of age at the time of nomination.
 A historical resource must be significant under one or more of the following criteria in order to qualify for listing as a Riverside County Historical Landmark. • Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of Riverside County’s history and cultural heritage. • Is associated with the lives of persons important to the history of Riverside County or its communities.
• Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, Riverside County region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual or possesses high artistic values.
• Has yielded or may be likely to yield, information important in Riverside County, state of California, or national prehistory or history.
 Integrity—historical resources that have been preserved, rehabilitated, or restored according to the U. S. Secretary of Interiors Standards for integrity will be given the highest consideration in the approval process.  Reconstructed buildings will not be considered for landmark status unless they are more than 45 years old and embody traditional building methods and techniques or they exhibit high artistic values in the execution of the reconstruction.

Public Resource Code 21073 and 21074
Public Resource Codes 21073 and 21074 define California Native American tribe and tribal cultural resources, respectively. PRC 21073 defines a “California Native American tribe” as a Native American tribe located in California that is on the contact list maintained by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC).

Tribal cultural resources (TCRs) are defined in Section 21074 of the California PRC as sites, features, places, cultural landscapes (geographically defined in terms of the size and scope), sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe that are either included in or determined to be eligible for inclusion in the CRHR, or are included in a local register of historical resources as defined in subdivision (k) of Section 5020.1, or are a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 5024.1.

California State Assembly Bill 52
Assembly Bill 52, Section 1(b)(4) established that a project that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a TCR is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment. A lead agency 1349
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update 6 October 27, 20232022-077 must begin consultation with California Native American tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the proposed project if the tribe requests to be informed of projects prior to the determination of a Negative Declaration, Mitigated Negative Declaration, or Environmental Impact Report ,or if the tribe responds within 30 days of formal notification. Only California Native American tribes, as defined in Section 21073 of the California PRC, are experts in the identification of TCRs and impacts thereto. If the lead agency determines that a tribal cultural resource is present in a project area and mitigation measures are not otherwise specified by the tribe, the lead agency may use the following to avoid impacts to the TCR:
 Avoid damaging effects to any tribal cultural resource;  Protect the cultural character and integrity of the resource;  Protect the traditional use of the resource;
 Protect the confidentiality of the resource; and
 Development of permanent conservation easements or other cultural appropriate management plans.

California Senate Bill 18
California Senate Bill (SB) 18 requires any local agency to consult with California Native American tribes for the preservation of or mitigation of impacts to specified Native American places, prior to the adoption or amendment of a city or county general plan. It also specifies that consultation with California Native American tribes is required for the purposes of preserving specified places, features, and objects that are located within a cities or counties jurisdiction.

The goal of SB 18 is to recognize that pre-contact, archaeological, cultural, spiritual, and ceremonial places are essential elements of Native American culture and to establish meaningful government-togovernment consultations early in the planning process to identify, consider, and preserve these places.

The legislation enables California Native American tribes to manage and act as caretakers of California Native American prehistoric, archaeological, cultural, spiritual, and ceremonial places. Local governments are encouraged to consider the preservation and cultural aspects of these places.

Laws Pertaining to Human Remains
Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act
The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990 is a federal law that mandates museums and federal agencies to return certain Native American cultural items—such as human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects, or objects of cultural patrimony—to lineal descendants or culturally affiliated Native American tribes.
1350
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
7 October 27, 2023
2022-077
California Health and Safety Codde
Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code requires that all work in the vicinity of the find stop until the county coroner determines if the remains are Native American and not the result of a crime scene. If the remains are determined to be Native American, the coroner must notify the NAHC within 24 hours. The NAHC will designate a Most Likely Descendent. Section 5097.94 provides additional guidance if human remains are identified during the course of a project.

CONTEXT
Regional Pre-Contact History, Southern California Non-Desert Regions Paleo-Indian Period/Terminal Pleistocene (12,000 to 10,000 BP) The first inhabitants of Southern California were big game hunters and gatherers exploiting extinct species of Pleistocene megafauna (e.g., mammoth and other Rancholabrean fauna). Local "fluted point" assemblages composed of large spear points or knives are stylistically and technologically similar to the Clovis Paleo-Indian cultural tradition dated to this period elsewhere in North America (Moratto 1984).

Archaeological evidence for this period in southern California is limited to a few small temporary camps with fluted points found around late Pleistocene Lake margins in the Mojave Desert and around Tulare Lake in the southern San Joaquin Valley. Single points are reported from Ocotillo Wells and Cuyamaca Pass in eastern San Diego County and from the Yuha Desert in Imperial County (Rondeau et al. 2007).

Early Archaic Period/Early Holocene (10,000 to 8,500 BP) Approximately 10,000 years ago, at the beginning of the Holocene, warming temperatures, and the extinction of the megafauna resulted in changing subsistence strategies with an emphasis hunting smaller game and increasing reliance on plant gathering. Previously, Early Holocene sites were represented by only a few sites and isolates from the Lake Mojave and San Dieguito complexes found along former lakebeds and grasslands of the Mojave Desert and in inland San Diego County. More recently, southern California Early Holocene sites have been found along the Santa Barbara Channel (Erlandson 1994), in western Riverside County (Goldberg 2001; Grenda 1997), and along the San Diego County coast (Gallegos 1991; Koerper et al. 1991; Warren 1967).

The San Dieguito Complex was defined based on material found at the Harris site (CA-SDI-149) on the San Dieguito River near Lake Hodges in San Diego County. San Dieguito artifacts include large leafshaped points; leaf-shaped knives; large ovoid, domed, and rectangular end and side scrapers; engraving tools; and crescentics (Koerper et al. 1991). The San Dieguito Complex at the Harris site dates to 9,000 to 7,500 BP (Gallegos 1991). However, sites from this time period in coastal San Diego County have yielded artifacts and subsistence remains characteristic of the succeeding Encinitas Tradition, including manos, metates, core-cobble tools, and marine shell (Gallegos 1991; Koerper et al. 1991). 1351
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update 8 October 27, 20232022-077 Encinitas Tradition or Milling Stone Period/Middle Holocene (8,500 to 1,250 BP) The Encinitas Tradition (Warren 1968) and the Milling Stone Period (Wallace 1955) refer to a long period of time during which small mobile bands of people who spoke an early Hokan language foraged for a wide variety of resources including hard seeds, berries, and roots/tubers (yucca in inland areas), rabbits and other small animals, and shellfish and fish in coastal areas. Sites from the Encinitas Tradition consist of residential bases and resource acquisition locations with no evidence for overnight stays. Residential bases have hearths and fire-affected rock indicating overnight stays and food preparation. Residential bases along the coast have large amounts of shell and are often termed shell middens.

The Encinitas Tradition as originally defined (Warren 1968) applied to all of the non-desert areas of southern California. Recently, four patterns within the Encinitas Tradition have been proposed which apply to different regions of southern California (Sutton and Gardner 2010). The Topanga Pattern includes archaeological material from the Los Angeles Basin and Orange County. The Greven Knoll Pattern pertains to southwestern San Bernardino County and western Riverside County (Sutton and Gardner 2010). Each of the patterns is divided into temporal phases. The Topanga Pattern included the Los Angeles Basin and Orange County. The Topanga I phase extends from 8,500 to 5,000 BP and Topanga II runs from 5,000 to 3,500 BP. The Topanga Pattern ended about 3,500 BP with the arrival of Takic speakers, except in the Santa Monica Mountains where the Topanga III phase lasted until about 2,000 BP.

The Encinitas Tradition in inland areas east of the Topanga Pattern (southwestern San Bernardino County and western Riverside County) is the Greven Knoll Pattern (Sutton and Gardner 2010). Greven Knoll I (9,400 to 4,000 BP) has abundant manos and metates. Projectile points are few and are mostly Pinto points. Greven Knoll II (4,000 to 3,000 BP) has abundant manos and metates and core tools. Projectile points are mostly Elko points. The Elsinore site on the east shore of Lake Elsinore was occupied during Greven Knoll I and Greven Knoll II. During Greven Knoll I faunal processing (butchering) took place at the lakeshore and floral processing (seed grinding), cooking, and eating took place farther from the shore.

The primary foods were rabbit meat and seeds from grasses, sage, and ragweed. A few deer, waterfowl, and reptiles were consumed. The recovered archaeological material suggests that a highly mobile population visited the site at a specific time each year. It is possible that their seasonal round included the ocean coast at other times of the year. These people had an unspecialized technology as exemplified by the numerous crescents, a multi-purpose tool. The few projectile points suggest that most of the small game was trapped using nets and snares (Grenda 1997). During Greven Knoll II, which included a warmer drier climatic episode known as the Altithermal, it is thought that populations in interior southern California concentrated at oases and that Lake Elsinore was one of them. The Elsinore site (CA-RIV-2798) is one of five known Middle Holocene residential sites around Lake Elsinore. Tools were mostly manos, metates, and hammerstones. Scraper planes were absent. Flaked-stone tools consisted mostly of utilized flakes used as scrapers. The Elsinore site during the Middle Holocene was a “recurrent extended encampment” which could have been occupied during much of the year.

The Encinitas Tradition lasted longer in inland areas because Takic speakers did not move east into these areas until circa 1,000 BP. Greven Knoll III (3,000 to 1,000 BP) is present at the Liberty Grove site in Cucamonga (Salls 1983) and at sites in Cajon Pass that were defined as part of the Sayles Complex (Kowta 1969). Greven Knoll III sites have a large proportion of manos and metates and core tools as well as 1352
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update 9 October 27, 20232022-077 scraper planes. Kowta (1969) suggested the scraper planes may have been used to process yucca and agave. The faunal assemblage consists of large quantities of lagomorphs (rabbits and hares) and lesser quantities of deer, rodents, birds, carnivores, and reptiles.

Palomar Tradition (1,250 to 150 BP)
The native people of southern California (north of a line from Agua Hedionda to Lake Henshaw in San Diego County) spoke Takic languages which form a branch or subfamily of the Uto-Aztecan language family. The Takic languages are divided into the Gabrielino-Fernandeño language, the Serrano-Kitanemuk group (the Serrano [includes the Vanyume dialect] and Kitanemuk languages), the Tataviam language, and the Cupan group (the Luiseño-Juaneño language, the Cahuilla Language, and the Cupeño language) (Golla 2011). According to Sutton (2009), Takic speakers occupied the southern San Joaquin Valley before 3,500 BP. Perhaps because of the arrival of Yokutsan speakers (a language in the Penutian language family) from the north, Takic speakers moved southeast. The ancestors of the Kitanemuk moved into the Tehachapi Mountains and the ancestors of the Tataviam moved into the upper Santa Clara River drainage.

The ancestors of the Gabrielino (Tongva) moved into the Los Angeles Basin about 3,500 BP, replacing the native Hokan speakers. Speakers of proto-Gabrielino reached the southern Channel Islands by 3,200 BP (Sutton 2009) and moved as far south as Aliso Creek in Orange County by 3,000 BP.

Takic people moved south into southern Orange County after 1,250 BP and became the ancestors of the Juaneño. Takic people moved inland from southern Orange County about 1,000 BP, becoming the ancestors of the Luiseño, Cupeño, and Cahuilla. Takic people from the Kitanemuk area moved east along the northern slopes of the San Gabriel Mountains and spread into the San Bernardino Mountains and along the Mojave River becoming the ancestors of the Serrano and the Vanyume.

The material culture of the inland areas where Takic languages were spoken at the time of Spanish contact is part of the Palomar Tradition (Sutton 2011). San Luis Rey I Phase (1,000 to 500 BP) and San Luis Rey II Phase (500 to 150 BP) pertain to the area occupied by the Luiseño at the time of Spanish contact.

The Peninsular I (1,000 to 750 BP), II (750 to 300 BP), and III (300 to 150 BP) Phases are used in the areas occupied by the Cahuilla and Serrano (Sutton 2011).

San Luis Rey I is characterized by Cottonwood Triangular arrow points, use of bedrock mortars, stone pendants, shell beads, quartz crystals, and bone tools. San Luis Rey II sees the addition of ceramics, including ceramic cremation urns, red pictographs on boulders in village sites, and steatite arrow straighteners. San Luis Rey II represents the archaeological manifestation of the antecedents of the historically known Luiseño (Goldberg 2001). During San Luis Rey I there were a series of small permanent residential bases at water sources, each occupied by a kin group (probably a lineage). During San Luis Rey II people from several related residential bases moved into a large village located at the most reliable water source (Waugh 1986). Each village had a territory that included acorn harvesting camps at higher elevations. Villages have numerous bedrock mortars, large dense midden areas with a full range of flaked and ground stone tools, rock art, and a cemetery.
1353
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update 10 October 27, 20232022-077 Ethnographic Context
The City of Wildomar falls within the territory of both the Luiseño and Juaneño. The Luiseño occupied most of the area drained by the San Luis Rey and Santa Margarita Rivers (Bean and Shipek 1978; Hodge 1907). The Luiseño lived in sedentary and autonomous village groups. Permanent villages were typically located in valley bottoms, along streams, or along coastal strands near mountain ranges where water was available and village defense was possible (Bean and Shipek 1978). The Luiseño speak a subfamily of the widespread Uto-Aztecan family of languages, which is vibrant and complex (Native Talk n.d.).

Villages had hereditary chiefs who controlled religious, economic, and territorial activities. An advisory council of ritual specialists and shamans was consulted for environmental and other knowledge. Large villages located along the coast or in inland valleys may have had more complex social and political structures than settlements controlling smaller territories (Bean and Shipek 1978; Strong 1929).

Luiseño subsistence centered on gathering acorns, seeds, greens, bulbs, roots, berries, and other vegetal foods. This was supplemented by hunting mammals such as deer, antelope, rabbit, woodrat, ground squirrels, and mice, as well as birds including quail, doves, and ducks. Inland populations had access to fishing and gathering sites on the coast, which they used during the winter months. Bands along the coast exploited marine resources, such as sea mammals, fish, crustaceans, and mollusks. Inland, trout and other fish were taken from mountain streams (Bean and Shipek 1978). Regions were allotted to each band and then further divided among the various families. These locations for procuring resources were valuable and protected by the family which owned the region (Sparkman 1908).

Hunting was done both individually and by organized groups. Tool technology for food acquisition, storage, and preparation reflects the size and quantity of items procured. Small game was hunted with the use of curved throwing sticks, nets, slings, or traps. Bows and arrows were used for hunting larger game.

Dugout canoes, basketry fish traps, and shell hooks were used for near-shore ocean fishing. Coiled and twined baskets were made for food gathering, preparation, storing, and serving. Other items used for food processing included large shallow trays for winnowing chaff from grain, ceramic and basketry storage containers, manos and metates for grinding seeds, and ceramic jars for cooking (Bean and Shipek 1978).

Houses were brush-thatched, conical structures, partially subterranean and held up-right by a series of main support and numerous lighter poles (Curtis 1970). Personal ornaments were made from “bone, clay, stone, shell, bear claws, glass, deer hooves,” abalone shell, deerskin, otter skin, and rabbit skin. These materials were used to create nose ornaments, cloaks, moccasins, Yucca fiber sandals and beads, among others (Bean and Shipek 1978).

Ethnographic descriptions of the Juaneño are often given in terms of their neighbors to the south, the Luiseño (Bean and Shipek 1978; White 1963), but also point to a separate ethnic identity (Kroeber 1925; Strong 1929). Perhaps the most important account of Juaneño culture are the observations made by Gerónimo Boscana, friar at Mission San Juan Capistrano from 1812 to 1826 (Boscana 1933). 1354
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
11 October 27, 2023
2022-077
Juaneño settlement and subsistence systems may extend back in time to the beginning of the Angeles IV Phase about 1,250 BP when Takic speakers moved south beyond Aliso Creek. The Juaneño were semisedentary hunters and gatherers. One of the most important food resources for inland groups were acorns gathered from oak groves in canyons, drainages, and foothills. Acorns were ground into flour using mortars and pestles. Seeds from sage and grasses, goosefoot, and California buckwheat were collected and ground into meal with manos and metates. Protein was supplied through the meat of deer, rabbits, and other animals hunted with bow and arrow or trapped using snares, nets, and deadfalls. Coastal dwellers collected shellfish and used carved shell hooks for fishing in bay/estuary, nearshore, and kelp bed zones. Dried fish and shellfish were probably traded for inland products such as acorns and venison.

The Juaneño lived in villages of up to 250 people located near permanent water and a variety of food sources. Each village was typically located at the center of an established territory from which resources for the group were gathered. Small groups left the village for short periods of time to hunt, fish, and gather plant foods. While away from the village, they established temporary camps and created locations where food and other materials were processed. Archaeologically, such locations are evidenced by manos and metates for seed grinding, bedrock mortars for acorn processing, and lithic scatters indicating manufacturing or maintenance of stone tools (usually made of chert) used in hunting or butchering.

Overnight stays in field camps are evidenced by fire-affected rock used in hearths.

Mission San Luis Rey
After the San Luis Rey Mission was established in 1798 on the lower San Luis Rey River, most Luiseño were converted and taken to the mission. Poor living conditions at the missions and introduced European diseases led to a rapid decline of the Luiseño population. Following closure of the missions by the Mexican Government, Luiseño dispersed throughout Southern California. Some worked on the Mexican ranchos, others moved to newly founded towns established for them, some sought refuge among inland groups, and a few managed to acquire land grants. Later, many moved to or were forced onto reservations established by the U.S. Government. Although many of their cultural traditions had been suppressed during the Mission Period, the Luiseño were successful at retaining their language and certain rituals and ceremonies. Starting in the 1970s, there was a revival of interest in the Luiseño language and culture. Today, the Luiseño consist of seven bands and work for “civil rights, cultural preservation and language revitalization” (Native Talk n.d.).

City of Wildomar
Rancho La Laguna was a grant of 3 square leagues made by Mexican governor Manuel Micheltorena to Julian Manriquez in 1844 (Gunther 1984). Rancho La Laguna included Lake Elsinore and what is now the City of Wildomar. The land grant did not include the surrounding hills.

After Julian Manriquez died, Rancho La Laguna was sold to Abel Stearns in 1852. Stearns sold the rancho to Agustín Machado in 1858. When confirmed by the United States in 1872, the grant had an area of 13,339 acres (Gunther 1984). Machado’s widow and 11 of the 12 children sold most of the rancho to an Englishman, Charles A. Sumner, in 1873. Sumner mortgaged his property in 1875 and lost the property through foreclosure and a sheriff’s sale in 1877. The new owner sold the property to Frederick M. Sumner, 1355
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
12 October 27, 2023
2022-077
the brother of Charles A. Sumner. In 1881, ownership was transferred to a San Francisco bank and in 1883, it was purchased by Franklin Heald, William Collier, and Donald Graham. The partners subdivided part of the property and began selling lots in what would become the Town of Elsinore. (Gunther 1984). These partners divided the La Laguna Ranch property in 1885 with Collier and Graham taking the area southeast of Corydon Road, which became the City of Wildomar (Gunther 1984).

Wildomar began as the Car B station, established in 1884 by the California Southern Railroad Company (CSRR) 6 miles south of the Elsinore Junction station (Gunther 1984). The station began as a railroad car on a siding. The name was changed to Wildon and lots were surveyed and platted in 1885. Wildon was based on the names of William Collier and Donald Graham. A new plat was recorded in 1886 with the name changed to Wildomar. The name Wildomar was formed using Wildon plus part of the first name of Margaret Collier, wife of William Collier and sister of Donald Graham (City of Wildomar n.d.a).

The original townsite was between Palomar Street and Grand Avenue and between Gruwell Street and Pasadena Avenue, according to the 1901 edition of the U.S. Geological Survey Elsinore Quadrangle. The Wildomar post office and the elementary school were established in 1886. With the arrival of many Quaker families from West Branch, Iowa, Wildomar became a Quaker colony. Wildomar was one of the election precincts and school districts when Riverside County was formed in 1893 (Gunther 1984).

Wildomar’s growth slowed when the CSRR’s tracks in Temecula Canyon were washed out for the final time in 1892, which severed the connection with San Diego; the tracks were not rebuilt (Robertson 1998). In 1927, the track in Railroad Canyon washed out and the Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe railroad track from Perris to Temecula was abandoned (Gunther 1984), after which, Wildomar no longer had rail service.

Wildomar remained a rural farming and horse ranching community for most of the 20th century (City of Wildomar n.d.b). Wildomar was incorporated as a city on July 1, 2008 with a population of 28,000. (City of Wildomar n.d.a, n.d.b).

KNOWN CULTURAL RESOURCES
Records Search
ECORP submitted a records search request to the Eastern Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System on April 11, 2022. The Eastern Information Center returned the results on April 22, 2022, which indicated that a total of 82 previously recorded cultural resources are within the Study Area (Appendix A). These previously recorded cultural resources consist of 26 pre-contact sites, 15 pre-contact isolates, 10 historic sites, 18 historic buildings or structures, 10 historic isolates, and 3 multicomponent sites comprising both historic and pre-contact components.

Types of Sites
Both pre-contact and historic sites are known to exist within the City of Wildomar. Pre-contact sites include lithic reduction sites, bedrock milling features, hearths, and remnants of habitation sites, and isolated pre-contact artifacts. Historic sites include privies or refuse scatters, irrigation systems, family homes, farms, and ranches.
1356
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update 13 October 27, 20232022-077 Pre-contact sites are often found situated along the banks of rivers and streams (current and former) in locations that provide easy access to a variety of resources. Historic sites are located in similar areas; however, some resources sought by settlers encouraged land use in unfavorable locations. Historic buildings or structures are generally located in or near the City of Wildomar center, although some structures or buildings associated with ranching activities or homesteads may be located in more rural areas. Artifacts associated with all of these activities may be found throughout the City; however, these artifacts are isolated.

The Built Environment Resources Directory
The Built Environment Resources Database lists 14 properties within the Study Area whose dates of occupancy or construction range between the years 1885 to 1940, and which range from single-family homes to health resorts (Table 1). Although none are currently listed on the CRHR or NRHP, four resources have been evaluated as potentially eligible, with a status code of 3S.

Table 1. Previously Evaluated Built Environment Resources within Study Area Address Name Date of
Construction
CRHR/
NRHP Code
25025 Catt Road — 1940 5S2
2525 Catt Road Schwartz 1934 5S2
32785 Central Street Judge William Collier Home, Lois Cook House 1885 5S2 21343 Dunn Street Ben Taylor House 1934 3S
35880 Frederick Street Heal Ranch, Robinson 1922 5S2
20619 Grand Avenue — 1935 7N
21999 Grand Avenue R.J. Brown 1886 3S
22060 Grand Avenue Easterbrook 1886 3S
22180 Grand Avenue — 1899 5S2
34860 Iodine Springs Road Iodine Springs 1925 5S2
21680 Lime Street — 1945 6Y
Palomar Street Wildomar Bell 1887 5S2
21564 Palomar Street — 1910 7N
21457 Pecan Street Dr. O.S. Brown 1888 3S
Notes: CRHR = California Register of Historical Resources; NRHP = National Register of Historic Places; 3S:

Appears eligible for NRHP individually through survey evaluation; 5S2: Individually eligible for local listing or designation; 6Y: Determined ineligible for NRHP by consensus through Section 106 process – Not evaluated for CR local listing; 7N: Needs to be reevaluated – formerly coded as may become NRHP eligible with specific conditions.
1357
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
14 October 27, 2023
2022-077
The National Register of Historic Places
The National Register of Historic Places lists two properties near the Study Area; both are located in the City of Lake Elsinore. The first property is the Armory Hall—a meeting hall that was originally constructed and used by the Grand Army of the Republic, which was a Civil War veterans’ organization in 1887. The hall is located at 252 North Main Street in Lake Elsinore, approximately 2 miles west of the City of Wildomar. The second property is the Crescent Bath House, which is also located about 2 miles west of the City of Wildomar, at 201 West Graham Avenue. This mineral bath house was built in the 1880s at the area’s largest mineral spring in Moorish style architecture (The Historical Marker Database 2022).

California Historic Landmarks
The nearest California Historic Landmark to the City of Wildomar is the Santa Rosa Rancho, which is located approximately 4.5 miles to the south.

RECOMMENDATIONS
There are a number of potential impacts to cultural resources that may occur through the implementation of development within the Study Area:
 the destruction of existing or unanticipated pre-contact and historical archaeological resources;  the destruction or adverse changes to built environment resources;  the potential to disturb Native American human remains; and/or  the destruction or adverse changes to tribal cultural resources.

In accordance with current city standards, ECORP recommends implementing the mitigations measures below to minimize potential impacts to cultural resources within the Study Area:

Cultural Resources
CUL-1 Human Remains. If human remains are encountered, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to Public Resource Code Section 5097.98(b), remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission shall be contacted within the period specified by law (i.e., 24 hours). Subsequently, the Native American Heritage Commission shall identify the "most likely descendant." The most likely descendant shall then make recommendations and engage in consultation concerning the treatment of the remains, as provided in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98.

Timing/Implementation: During any ground-disturbing construction activities Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Engineering Department and Community Development Department
1358
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update 15 October 27, 20232022-077 CUL-2 Site-Specific Cultural Resources Study and Evaluation of Resources. A site-specific cultural resources study shall be completed prior to the approval of projects. This sitespecific cultural resources study shall include, but not be limited to, a records search with the California Historical Resource Information System, review of historical documents, a Sacred Lands File search with the NAHC, and a field survey/site effort. The findings of the study shall be submitted as a report that follows the California Office of Historic Preservation’s recommended content and format. The report will provide the historic context, methods, results, and recommendations for appropriate findings.

Timing/Implementation: Prior to project approval
Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Engineering Department and Community Development Department
Tribal Cultural Resources
TRI-1 Unanticipated Discoveries. If during ground disturbance activities, cultural resources are discovered that were not assessed by the archaeological report(s) and/or environmental assessment conducted prior to project approval, the following procedures shall be followed.

Cultural resources are defined, as being multiple artifacts in close association with each other, but also include fewer artifacts if the area of the find is determined to be of significance due to its sacred or cultural importance as determined in consultation with the lead agency and Native American tribe(s) that elected to consult under Assembly Bill (AB) 52 (“Consulting Tribe(s)”).
a. All ground disturbance activities within 100 feet of the discovered cultural resources shall be halted until a meeting is convened between the developer, the archaeologist, the tribal representative(s) and the Community Development Director to discuss the significance of the find.
b. At the meeting, the significance of the discoveries shall be discussed, and after consultation with the tribal representative(s), developer, and the archaeologist, a decision shall be made, with the concurrence of the Community Development Director, as to the appropriate mitigation (documentation, recovery, avoidance, etc.) for the cultural resources.
c. Grading or further ground disturbance shall not resume within the area of the discovery until an agreement has been reached by all parties as to the appropriate mitigation. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area and will be monitored by additional Tribal monitors if needed.
d. Treatment and avoidance of the newly discovered resources shall be approved by the City. This may include avoidance of the cultural resources through project design, inplace preservation of cultural resources located in native soils and/or re-burial on the project property so they are not subject to further disturbance in perpetuity as identified in Mitigation Measures TRI-2 and TRI-7.
1359
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update 16 October 27, 20232022-077 e. If the find is determined to be significant and avoidance of the site has not been achieved, a Phase III data recovery plan (see Mitigation Measure TRI-6) shall be prepared by the project archeologist, in consultation with the Consulting Tribe(s), and shall be submitted to the City for their review and approval prior to implementation of the plan.
f. Pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(b), avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources and tribal cultural resources. If the landowner and the Consulting Tribe(s) cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for the archaeological or tribal cultural resources, these issues will be presented to the Community Development Director for decision. The City’s Community Development Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological and tribal cultural resources, recommendations of the project archeologist, substantial evidence, and shall take into account the cultural and religious principles and practices of the Consulting Tribe(s). Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the City Community Development Director shall be appealable to the City Planning Commission and/or City Council.

Timing/Implementation: During any ground-disturbing or construction activities Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Engineering Department and Community Development Department
TRI-2 Cultural Resources Disposition. In the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered during the course of grading (inadvertent discoveries), the following procedures shall be carried out for final disposition of the discoveries:
a. One or more of the following treatments, in order of preference, shall be employed with the Consulting Tribe(s). Evidence of such shall be provided to the City of Wildomar Community Development Department:
i. Preservation-In-Place of the cultural resources, if feasible. Preservation in place means avoiding the resources, leaving them in the place where they were found with no development affecting the integrity of the resources. ii. Reburial of the resources on the project property. The measures for reburial shall include, at least, the following: measures and provisions to protect the future reburial area from any future impacts in perpetuity. Reburial shall not occur until all legally required cataloging and basic recordation have been completed, with an exception that sacred items, burial goods, and Native American human remains are excluded. Any reburial process shall be culturally appropriate. Listing of contents and location of the reburial shall be included in the confidential Phase IV report (see Mitigation Measure TRI6). The Phase IV report shall be filed with the City under a confidential cover and not subject to Public Records Requests.
1360
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
17 October 27, 2023
2022-077
iii. If preservation-in-place or reburial is not feasible, then the resources shall be curated in a culturally appropriate manner at a Riverside County curation facility that is approved by the City. The collection and associated records shall be transferred, including title, and are to be accompanied by payment of the fees by the applicant necessary for permanent curation. Evidence of curation in the form of a letter from the curation facility stating that subject archaeological materials have been received and that all fees have been paid, shall be provided by the landowner to the City. There shall be no destructive or invasive testing on sacred items, burial goods, and Native American human remains, as defined by the cultural and religious practices of the most likely descendant. Results concerning finds of any inadvertent discoveries shall be included in the Phase IV monitoring report.

Timing/Implementation: During grading activities
Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Engineering Department and Community Development Department
TRI-3 Archaeological Monitoring. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall retain a Riverside County-qualified Registered Professional Archaeologist (RPA) to monitor all ground disturbing activities in an effort to identify any unknown archaeological resources.

The Registered Professional Archaeologist and tribal monitor(s) required by Mitigation Measures TRI-4 and TRI-5 shall manage and oversee monitoring for all initial ground disturbing activities and excavation of each portion of the project site, including clearing, grubbing, tree removals, mass or rough grading, trenching, stockpiling of materials, rock crushing, structure demolition, etc. The Registered Professional Archaeologist and tribal monitor(s) shall independently have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect, or halt the ground disturbance activities to allow identification, evaluation, and potential recovery of cultural resources in coordination with any required special interest or tribal monitors.

The developer/permit holder shall submit a fully executed copy of the contract to the Community Development Department to ensure compliance with this condition of approval.

Upon verification, the Community Development Department shall clear this condition.

In addition, the Registered Professional Archaeologist, in consultation with the Consulting Tribe(s), the contractor, and the City, shall develop a Cultural Resources Management Plan (CRMP) pursuant to the definition in AB 52 to address the details, timing, and responsibility of all archaeological and cultural activities that will occur on the project site. A consulting tribe is defined as a tribe that initiated the AB 52 tribal consultation process for the project, has not opted out of the AB 52 consultation process, and has completed AB 52 consultation with the City as provided for in Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.2(b)(1) of AB 52.

Details in the Plan shall include the following:
a. Project grading and development scheduling
1361
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update 18 October 27, 20232022-077 b. The project archaeologist and the Consulting Tribes(s) shall attend the pre-grading meeting with the City, the construction manager, and any contractors, and will conduct a mandatory Cultural Resources Worker Sensitivity Training to those in attendance. The training will include a brief review of the cultural sensitivity of the project and the surrounding area; what resources could potentially be identified during earthmoving activities; the requirements of the monitoring program; the protocols that apply in the event inadvertent discoveries of cultural resources are identified, including who to contact and appropriate avoidance measures until the find(s) can be properly evaluated; and any other appropriate protocols. All new construction personnel that will conduct earthwork or grading activities that begin work on the project following the initial training must take the Cultural Resources Worker Sensitivity Training prior to beginning work and the project archaeologist and Consulting Tribe(s) shall make themselves available to provide the training on an as-needed basis;
c. The protocols and stipulations that the contractor, City, Consulting Tribe(s) and project archaeologist will follow in the event of inadvertent cultural resources discoveries, including any newly discovered cultural resource deposits that shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation.

Timing/Implementation: Prior to issuance of grading permit Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Engineering Department and Community Development Department
TRI-4 Native American Monitoring (Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians). Tribal monitor(s) shall be required onsite during all ground-disturbing activities, including grading, stockpiling of materials, engineered fill, rock crushing, etc. The land divider/permit holder shall retain a qualified tribal monitor(s) from the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall submit a copy of a signed contract between the abovementioned tribe and the land divider/permit holder for the monitoring of the project to the Community Development Department and to the Engineering Department. The tribal monitor(s) shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt the grounddisturbance activities to allow recovery of cultural resources, in coordination with the project archaeologist.

Timing/Implementation: During ground-disturbing activities Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Engineering Department and Community Development Department
TRI-5 Native American Monitoring (Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians). Tribal monitor(s) shall be required onsite during all ground-disturbing activities, including grading, stockpiling of materials, engineered fill, rock crushing, etc. The land divider/permit holder shall retain a qualified tribal monitor(s) from the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall submit a copy of a signed contract between the above1362 ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update 19 October 27, 20232022-077 mentioned tribe and the land divider/permit holder for the monitoring of the project to the Community Development Department and to the Engineering Department. The tribal monitor(s) shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt the grounddisturbance activities to allow recovery of cultural resources, in coordination with the project archaeologist.

Timing/Implementation: During ground-disturbing activities Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Engineering Department and Community Development Department
TRI-6 Archeology Report - Phase III and IV. Prior to final inspection, the developer/permit holder shall prompt the project archeologist to submit two (2) copies of the Phase III Data Recovery report (if required for the project) and the Phase IV Cultural Resources Monitoring report. The Phase IV report shall include evidence of the required cultural/historical sensitivity training for the construction staff held during the pre-grade meeting. The Community Development Department shall review the reports to determine adequate mitigation compliance. Provided the reports are adequate, the Community Development Department shall clear this condition. Once the report(s) are determined to be adequate, two (2) copies shall be submitted to the Eastern Information Center (EIC) at the University of California, Riverside, and one (1) copy shall be submitted to the Consulting Tribe(s) Cultural Resources Department(s).

Timing/Implementation: Prior to final inspection
Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Engineering Department and Community Development Department
TRI-7 Non-Disclosure of Reburial Locations. It is understood by all parties that unless otherwise required by law, the site of any reburial of Native American human remains or associated grave goods shall not be disclosed and shall not be governed by public disclosure requirements of the California Public Records Act. The coroner, pursuant to the specific exemption set forth in California Government Code 6254 (r), parties, and Lead Agencies, will be asked to withhold public disclosure information related to such reburial, pursuant to the specific exemption set forth in California Government Code 6254 (r).

Timing/Implementation: During discovery of Native American human remains Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Engineering Department and Community Development Department
TRI-8 No-Build Easement or Similar Instrument. In the event that Native American artifacts are found and buried within the project vicinity, a no-build easement or similar legal instrument shall be used to preclude future development from taking place on the reburial site(s).

Timing/Implementation: Reburial of Native American Artifacts Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Engineering Department and Community Development Department
1363
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update 20 October 27, 20232022-077 Sincerely,
Sonia Sifuentes, RPA
Southern California Manager of Cultural Resources
Senior Archaeologist
1364
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
21 October 27, 2023
2022-077

REFERENCES
City of Wildomar.
_____. n.d.a. Celebrating 10 Years of Cityhood.
https://www.cityofwildomar.org/DocumentCenter/View/598/10-Years-of-Cityhood-PDF?bidId=.

Accessed June 31, 2023.
_____. n.d.b. About Wildomar. https://www.cityofwildomar.org/256/History. Accessed June 7, 2023.

Bean, Lowell John and Florence C. Shipek. 1978 Luiseño. In Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 8: California. Edited by R.F. Heizer, pp. 550-563. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.

Boscana, G. 1933. Chinigchinich: A Revised and Annotated Version of Alfred Robinson’s Translation of Fater Geronimo Boscana’s Historical Account of the Belief, Usages, Customs and Extravagancies of the Indians of San Juan Capistrano Called the Acagchemem Tribe. Originally published in 1846.

Fine Arts Press, Santa Ana.

Curtis, Edward 1970. The North American Indian. Being a series of volumes picturing and describing the Indians of the United States, the dominion of Canada and Alaska. Johnson Reprint Corporation, New York, N.Y.

Erlandson, J. M. 1994. Early Hunter-Gatherers of the California Coast. Plenum Press, New York.

Gallegos, D. 1991. Antiquity and Adaptation at Agua Hedionda, Carlsbad, California. In Hunter-Gatherers of Early Holocene Coastal California, edited by J. M. Erlandson and R. H. Colten, pp. 19-41.

Perspectives in California Archaeology, Volume 1. Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles.

Goldberg, S. 2001. Eastside Reservoir Project: Final Report of Archaeological Investigations (Five volumes).

Applied Earthworks, Inc., Hemet, California.

Golla, V. 2011. California Indian Languages. University of California Press, Berkeley.

Grenda, D. R. 1997. Continuity and Change: 8,500 Years of Lacustrine Adaptation on the Shores of Lake Elsinore: Archaeological Investigations at a Stratified Site in Southern California. Statistical Research Technical Series No 59. Statistical Research, Inc., Tucson, Arizona.

Gunther, Jane D. 1984. Riverside County, California, Placenames: Their Origins and Their Stories. Rubidoux Printing Company, Riverside.

Historical Marker Database. 2022. Crescent Bath House. https://www.hmdb.org/m.asp?m=178935.

Accessed October 25, 2023.

Hodge, Fredrick 1907 Handbook of American Indians. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 30, Part I.

Koerper, H. C., P. Langenwalter II, and A. Schroth. 1991. Early Holocene Adaptations and the Transition Problem: Evidence from the Allan O. Kelly Site, Agua Hedionda Lagoon. In Hunter-Gatherers of Early Holocene Coastal California, edited by J. M. Erlandson and R. H. Colten, pp. 81-88. 1365
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update
22 October 27, 2023
2022-077
Perspectives in California Archaeology, Volume 1. Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles.

Kowta, M. 1969. The Sayles Complex: A Late Milling Stone Assemblage from Cajon Pass and the Ecological Implications of Its Scraper Planes. University of California Publications in Anthropology 6.

Berkeley.

Kroeber, A. L. 1925. Handbook of the Indians of California. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 78.

Washington.

Moratto, Michael J. 1984. California Archaeology. Academic Press, Inc. (Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, Publishers), Orlando, Florida.

Native Talk. n.d. The Luiseño of California. http://nativetalk.org/the-Luiseño-of-california/. Accessed April 21, 2022.

Robertson, Donald B. 1998. Encyclopedia of Western Railroad History, Volume IV, California. The Caxton Printers, Caldwell, Idaho.

Rondeau, M. F., J. Cassidy, and T. L. Jones. 2007. Colonization Technologies: Fluted Projectile Points and the San Clemente Island Woodworking/Microblade Complex. In California Prehistory:

Colonization, Culture, and Complexity, edited by T. L. Jones and K. A. Klar, pp. 299-315. Altamira Press, Lanham, Maryland.

Salls, R. A. 1983. The Liberty Grove Site: Archaeological Interpretation of a Late Milling Stone Horizon Site on the Cucamonga Plain. M.A. Thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles.

Sparkman, Philip S. 1908. The Culture of the Luiseño Indians. The University Press, Berkeley, California.

Strong, William D. 1929. Aboriginal Society in Southern California. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 26(1):1-358.

Sutton, M. Q. 2011. The Palomar Tradition and Its Place in the Prehistory of Southern California. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly 44(4):1-74.
_____. 2009. People and Language: Defining the Takic Expansion into Southern California. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly 41(2 and 3):31-93.

Sutton, M. Q. and J. K. Gardner. 2010. Reconceptualizing the Encinitas Tradition of Southern California.

Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly 42(4):1-64.

Wallace, W. J. 1955. A Suggested Chronology for Southern California Coastal Archaeology. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 11:214-230.

Warren, C. N. 1968. Cultural Tradition and Ecological Adaptation on the Southern California Coast. In Archaic Prehistory in the Western United States, edited by Cynthia Irwin-Williams, pp. 1-14.

Eastern New Mexico University Contributions in Anthropology 1. Portales, New Mexico. 1366
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

City of Wildomar General Plan Update 23 October 27, 20232022-077 _____. 1967. The San Dieguito Complex: a Review and Hypothesis. American Antiquity 32:168-185.

White, Raymond C. 1963. Luiseño Social Organization. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 48(2):91-194. Berkeley.
1367

APPENDIX A
Records Search Confirmation
1368
Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources RI-00108 1973 Bundy Canyon Development: Potential
Impact On Archaeological Resources
Archaeoloical Research
Unit, U.C. Riverside
Joan R. Smith and
Robert L. Bettinger
NADB-R - 1080121; 33-001255, 33-001256, 33-001257
Submitter - 76;
Voided - MF-0094
RI-00109 1987 Cultural Resources Evaluation of the Warm Springs Property, Approximately 650 Acres In
Western Riverside County, California.

RMW Paleo Associates,
Mission Viejo, CA
NADB-R - 1080122 Ronald M. Bissell 33-003956, 33-007881, 33-011624 RI-00349 1978 An Archaeological Survey of the Joaquin
Ranch (Tentative Tract # 10,459) in the
County of Riverside, California
Paul G. Chace &
Associates, Escondido, CA
Paul G. Chace 33-001139, 33-001273, 33-001274,
33-001276, 33-001279, 33-001281,
33-001282, 33-001283, 33-001285,
33-001287, 33-001288, 33-001289,
33-001290, 33-002418, 33-002808,
33-002809, 33-002810, 33-002811,
33-002812, 33-002813, 33-002814,
33-011266, 33-011268, 33-013512,
33-013744, 33-013746, 33-013749,
33-013848
NADB-R - 1080406;
Voided - MF-0314
RI-00351 1989 Letter Report: Archaeological Monitoring of Grading-Tracts 21370, 21371, and 24342
Archaeological Reseach
Unit, U.C. Riverside
NADB-R - 1083207; Brooke S. Arkush 33-001273
Voided - MF-0314
RI-00508 1978 Environmental Impact Evaluation:

Archaeological Assessment of Tentative
Tract Map 11495, Near Wildomar, Riverside
County, California
Archaeological Research
Unit, U.C. Riverside
NADB-R - 1080547; Stan Wilmoth
Voided - MF-0440
RI-00509 1978 Environmental Impact Evaluation:

Archaeological Assessment of Tentative
Parcel Map 12198, Murrieta Area of Riverside
County, California
Archaeological Research
Unit, U.C. Riverside
NADB-R - 1080548; Stan Wilmoth
Other - UCRARU
#337;
Voided - MF-0441
RI-00562 1979 An Archaeological Assessment of Parcel 13, 290
Larry L. Bowles and Jean Archaeological Consultant
A. Salpas
NADB-R - 1080600;
Voided - MF-0490
RI-00703 1979 Archaeological Survey Report on Lot 25 in Block "B" of Murrieta Eucalyptus Company's
Tract as Shown by Map on File in Book 6,

Page 73 ends

in Temecula Rancho
Scientific Resource
Surveys, Inc., Santa Ana,
CA
NADB-R - 1080754; Roger J. Desautels
Voided - MF-0626
RI-00829 1980 Enivornmental Impact Evaluation: An
Archaeological Assessment of Tentative
Parcel 16945, Northwest of Murrieta in
Riverside County, California
Archaeological Research
Unit, U.C. Riverside
NADB-R - 1080882; Alan Davis
Other - UCRARU
#600;
Voided - MF-0750
RI-00984 1978 An Archaeological Assessment of Parcel
12,139
Archaeological Consultants,
Colton and Riverside, CA
Larry L. Bowles and Jean
A. Salpas
NADB-R - 1081034;
Voided - MF-0894

Page 1 of 27 ends

1369
Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources RI-00985 1980 Environmental Impact Evaluation: An
Archaological Assessment of Tentative
Parcel 16761, Southeast of Sun City in
Riverside County, California
Archaeological Research
Unit, U.C. Riverside
NADB-R - 1081035; Stephen Bouscaren 33-001999, 33-002001 Submitter - UCRARU
#584;
Voided - MF-0894
RI-01068 1980 Environmental Impact Evaluation: An
Archaeological Assessment of the Bundy
Canyon Project, Riverside County, California
Archaeological Research
Unit, U.C. Riverside
NADB-R - 1081169; Richard C. Jenkins
Submitter - 597;
Voided - MF-1014
RI-01089 1980 An Archaeological Assessment of Parcel
16684
Archaeological Consultant,
Riverside, CA
NADB-R - 1081186; Jean A. Salpas 33-002042
Voided - MF-1031
RI-01246 1981 Environmental Impact Evaluation: An
Archaeological Assessment of Tentative
Parcel 17625, Northwest of Murrieta in
Riverside County, California
Archaeological Reseach
Unit, U.C. Riverside
NADB-R - 1081408; Alan Davis
Other - UCRARU
#628;
Voided - MF-1241
RI-01482 1982 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
PARCEL 16683
NADB-R - 1081743; SALPAS, JEAN AUTHOR(S)
Voided - MF-1556
RI-01563 1978 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
PARCEL 12,108
Archaeological Consultant,
Colton & Riverside, CA
BOWLES, LARRY L. and

JEAN SALPAS
NADB-R - 1081855;
Voided - MF-1663
RI-01564 1978 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
PARCEL 12142
BOWLES, LARRY L. and AUTHOR(S)

JEAN SALPAS
NADB-R - 1081856;
Voided - MF-1664
RI-01620 1982 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT
FOR THE FARM AMENDED S.P. 116 C/W #2
NADB-R - 1081909; BOWLES, LARRY L. AUTHOR(S) 33-012770, 33-013503 Voided - MF-1715
RI-01656 1983 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF PM
19059

ARCHAEOLOGICAL

SYSTEMS MANAGMENT
NADB-R - 1081948; COOK, J.R.

Voided - MF-1752
RI-01696 1983 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
PARCEL 19427
NADB-R - 1082023; SALPAS, JEAN AUTHOR(S)
Voided - MF-1824
RI-01720 1983 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT
FOR CHANGE OF ZONE 4015, RANCHO

CALIFORNIA AREA OF RIVERSIDE

COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

ARCHAEOLOGICAL
RESEARCH UNIT, U.C.

RIVERSIDE
NADB-R - 1082045; MCCARTHY, DANIEL F. 33-001274
Voided - MF-1845
RI-01768 1984 ARCHAEOLOGICAL TEST EXCAVATIONS
AT CA-RIV-2769, A LATERAL DEBRIS

BASIN, WILDOMAR, RIVERSIDE COUNTY,

CALIFORNIA

ARCHAEOLOGICAL
RESEARCH UNIT, U.C.

RIVERSIDE
MCCARTHY, DANIEL F.
and PHILIP J. WILKE
NADB-R - 1082115; 33-002769
Submitter - UCRARU
#763;
Voided - MF-1912
RI-01769 1984 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF

FOUR PROPOSED FLOOD CONTROL

PROJECTS NEAR WILDOMAR, RIVERSIDE

COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

ARCHAEOLOGICAL
RESEARCH UNIT, U.C.

RIVERSIDE
MCCARTHY, DANIEL F. 33-002766, 33-002767, 33-002768,
33-002769
NADB-R - 1082116;
Voided - MF-1912
RI-01890 1984 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
PARCEL 20349
NADB-R - 1082261; SALPAS, JEAN AUTHOR(S)
Voided - MF-2046

Page 2 of 27 ends

1370
Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources RI-01906 1984 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT -
TPM19842

SCIENTIFIC AUTHOR(S)

RESOURCE SURVEYS,
INC.

NADB-R - 1082281;
Voided - MF-2065
RI-02020 1985 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
TRACT 20311, RIVERSIDE COUNTY,

CALIFORNIA
NADB-R - 1082444; KELLER, JEAN SALPAS AUTHOR(S)
Voided - MF-2210
RI-02106 1987 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
PARCEL 22000, RIVERSIDE COUNTY,

CALIFORNIA
NADB-R - 1082532; KELLER, JEAN SALPAS AUTHOR(S)
Voided - MF-2298
RI-02121 1987 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT FORM:

TP 22611

SCIENTIFIC AUTHOR(S)

RESOURCES
SURVEYS, INC.

NADB-R - 1082548;
Voided - MF-2309
RI-02164 1987 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
APPROXIMATELY 2000 ACRES IN THE

VICINITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, COUNTY

OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA

ARCHAEOLOGICAL

RESOURCE

MANAGEMENT

CORPORATION
DIBBLE, D. STEPHEN
and M.G. COTTRELL
33-001021, 33-003331, 33-003332,
33-003333, 33-003334, 33-013326
NADB-R - 1082593;
Voided - MF-2351
RI-02215 1988 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
TENTATIVE PARCEL 23087, LOCATED

NORTH OF MURRIETA IN

SOUTHWESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY,

CALIFORNIA

ARCHAEOLOGICAL
RESEARCH UNIT, U.C.

RIVERSIDE
NADB-R - 1082646; GOODMAN, JOHN D.

Submitter - UCRARU
#939;
Voided - MF-2402
RI-02219 1988 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 22776,

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
NADB-R - 1082650; KELLER, JEAN SALPAS AUTHOR(S)
Voided - MF-2406
RI-02283 1988 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF

THE FARM-SECONDARY HIGHWAY

ACCESS STUDY
NADB-R - 1082720; DROVER, C.E. AUTHOR(S) 33-003413
Voided - MF-2476
RI-02297 1987 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY -

VICTORY HILL
CHACE, PAUL G. and CHACE AND ASSOCIATES

DONNA COLLINS
NADB-R - 1082735;
Voided - MF-2491
RI-02313 1988 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
TTM # 23281, RIVERSIDE COUNTY,

CALIFORNIA
NADB-R - 1082770; KELLER, JEAN SALPAS AUTHOR(S)
Voided - MF-2514
RI-02325 1988 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
AN 18.27 ACRE TRACT OF LAND SHOWN
ON TTM # 23361, IN WILDOMAR,

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND

ETHNOGRAPHIC FIELD

ASSOCIATES
NADB-R - 1082782; DE MUNCK, VICTOR
Voided - MF-2526
RI-02333 1987 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT FORM:

WINKER ACRES (TRACT 22948)

SCIENTIFIC RESOURCE
SURVEYS, INC.

WHITNEY-DESAUTELS,
NANCY
NADB-R - 1082791; 33-003405
Voided - MF-2535

Page 3 of 27 ends

1371
Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources RI-02382 1989 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
T.P. 23508 LOCATED NORTH OF

MURRIETA IN SOUTHWESTERN

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

ARCHAELOGICAL

RESEARCH UNIT,

UNIVERSITY OF CALIF,

RIVERSIDE
NADB-R - 1082880; PARR, ROBERT E.

Submitter - UCRARU
#986;
Voided - MF-2622
RI-02438 1988 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF

8.12 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED IN THE

WILDOMAR AREA OF RIVERSIDE

COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

ARCHAEOLOGICAL
RESEARCH UNIT, U.C.

RIVERSIDE
NADB-R - 1082929; SWOPE, KAREN K. 33-013515
Submitter - 974;
Voided - MF-2670
RI-02508 1989 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 24469,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

NADB-R - 1082994; KELLER, JEAN A. AUTHOR(S)
Voided - MF-2733
RI-02533 1989 CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT
OF TENTATIVE TRACT 24647, WILDOMAR
AREA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

MICHAEL K LERCH &

ASSOCIATES
NADB-R - 1083020; LERCH, MICHAEL K.

Voided - MF-2757
RI-02535 1989 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
CHANGE OF ZONE 5328/PLOT PLAN
10,893 RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

NADB-R - 1083022; KELLER, JEAN S. AUTHOR(S)
Voided - MF-2759
RI-02537 1989 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
TENTATIVE TRACT 24722, NEAR

WILDOMAR, RIVERSIDE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA.

ARCHAEOLOGICAL

RESOURCE

MANAGEMENT

CORPORATION

DEL CHARIO,
KATHLEEN C.

NADB-R - 1083024;
Voided - MF-2761
RI-02625 1990 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF

THE BUNDY CANYON ROAD

REALIGNMENT PROJECT LOCATED IN
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

ARCHAEOLOGICAL

RESEARCH UNIT
NADB-R - 1083100; YOHE, ROBERT M.

Submitter - 1045;
Voided - MF-2836
RI-02684 1989 ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND

PALEONTOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF A
3+ ACRE PORTION OF TPM 25065

ADJACENT TO INLAND VALLEY

REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, RIVERSIDE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

SCIENTIFIC SRS, INC.

RESOURCE SURVEYS
NADB-R - 1083154;
Submitter - #914;
Voided - MF-2886
RI-02699 1990 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
TENTATIVE TRACT 25113 LOCATED IN

WILDOMAR IN SOUTH WESTERN
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

ARCHAEOLOGICAL

RESEARCH UNIT
NADB-R - 1083175; ARKUSH, BROOKE
Voided - MF-2903
RI-02746 1990 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 25177 RIVERSIDE

COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
NADB-R - 1083354; KELLER, JEAN A. AUTHOR
Voided - MF-2949

Page 4 of 27 ends

1372
Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources RI-02747 1990 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 23295 RIVERSIDE

COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
NADB-R - 1083355; KELLER, JEAN A. AUTHOR
Voided - MF-2950
RI-02823 1990 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 25545 RIVERSIDE

COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Consulting Archaeologist,
Temecula, CA
NADB-R - 1083429; KELLER, JEAN A.

Voided - MF-3023
RI-02842 1990 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
A 20.31 ACRE PARCEL DESIGNATED APN
365-250-014 LOCATED BETWEEN

CROOKED ARROW DRIVE AND CRAB

HOLLOW CIRCLE IN THE SEDO HILLS

AREA OF LAKE ELSINORE, RIVERSIDE

COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

ARCHAEOLOGICAL
ASSOCIATES, LTD.

NADB-R - 1083446; WHITE, ROBERT S.

Voided - MF-3040
RI-02848 1990 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24274

CALIFORNIA OAKS AREA, RIVERSIDE

COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

ARCHAEOLOGICAL

RESOURCE

MANAGEMENT
CORPORATION, Fullterton,
CA
KATHLEEN C. DEL
CHARIO
NADB-R - 1083451;
Voided - MF-3045
RI-02888 1989 SURFACE COLLECTION AND TEST

EXCAVATION AT THE TUNSTALL EAST

AND WEST SITES, WILDOMAR,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY.

SCIENTIFIC SRS

RESOURCE SURVEYS
NADB-R - 1083242; 33-004725, 33-004726
Voided - MF-3087
RI-02940 1990 VEGETATION MANAGEMENT

ARCHAEOLOGICAL REVIEW SUNSET VMP
PROJECT.

CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF

FORESTRY AND FIRE

PROTECTION
NADB-R - 1083311; JENKINS, RICHARD 33-001991
Voided - MF-3168
RI-03003 1990 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
23250 BAXTER ROAD, A 2.35 ACRE

PARCEL IN WILDOMAR, RIVERSIDE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

NADB-R - 1083547; DILLON, BRIAN D. AUTHOR
Voided - MF-3227
RI-03028 1990 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
PARCEL MAP 25282, RIVERSIDE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA.

DROVER, AUTHOR
CHRISTOPHER E.

NADB-R - 1083575;
Voided - MF-3253
RI-03052 1990 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
A 20.28 ACRE PARCEL DESIGNATED APN
365-25-005, LOCATED ADJACENT TO

CROOKED ARROW DRIVE IN THE SEDO

HILLS AREA OF LAKE ELSINORE,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY.

ARCHAEOLOGICAL
ASSOCIATES, LTD., Sun
City, CA
NADB-R - 1083600; WHITE, ROBERT S. 33-004154
Voided - MF-3276

Page 5 of 27 ends

1373
Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources RI-03078 1990 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 26372 RIVERSIDE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

NADB-R - 1083627; KELLER, JEAN A. AUTHOR
Voided - MF-3300
RI-03079 1990 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
TENTATIVE MAP 26371 RIVERSIDE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

NADB-R - 1083628; KELLER, JEAN A. AUTHOR
Voided - MF-3301
RI-03127 1990 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 3109,

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
NADB-R - 1083680; KELLER, JEAN A. AUTHOR(S)
Voided - MF-3347
RI-03134 1990 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 25994,

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
NADB-R - 1083687; KELLER, JEAN A. AUTHOR(S)
Voided - MF-3354
RI-03171 1990 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 26184,

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Consulting Archaeologist,
Temecula, CA
NADB-R - 1083729; KELLER, JEAN A.

Voided - MF-3389
RI-03240 1990 LETTER REPORT: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL
SURVEY OF THE TENTATIVE MAP NO.
25247, WILDOMAR PROPERTY
NADB-R - 1084094; WADE, SUSAN A. RECON
Submitter - 2129A;
Voided - MF-3472
RI-03305 1991 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
A 2300+ FOOT SEWER ALIGNMENT

LOCATED IN THE CITY OF LAKE

ELSINORE, RIVERSIDE COUNTY

ARCHAEOLOGICAL
ASSOCIATES, LTD.

NADB-R - 1083903; WHITE, ROBERT S.

Voided - MF-3537
RI-03333 1991 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY AND

TEST EXCAVATION, LAKE ELSINORE,

CALIFORNIA

GREENWOOD AND

ASSOCIATES, AND
INFOTEC RESEARCH, INC.

HAMPSON, R. PAUL 33-002798, 33-004042, 33-004043,
33-004044, 33-004045
NADB-R - 1083949;
Other - DACW09-90-
D-0004;
Voided - MF-3571
RI-03340 1988 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
CHANGE OF ZONE 5231, RIVERSIDE

COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
NADB-R - 1083958; KELLER, JEAN SALPAS AUTHOR
Voided - MF-3580
RI-03341 1998 CULTURAL RESOURCES REPORT:

SENIOR LIFESTYLE PERSPECTIVES
PROJECT, APNS 369-050-040, -041, AND -
042, NEAR THE COMMUNITY OF

WILDOMAR, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
LOVE, BRUCE and Bai CRM TECH
"Tom" Tang
NADB-R - 1085264; 33-008173
Submitter - 311;
Voided - MF-3580
RI-03353 1989 LETTER REPORT: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL
SURVEY OF THE TENTATIVE MAP NO.
25094, WILDOMAR PROPERTY
NADB-R - 1083981; WADE, SUE A. RECON
Submitter - 2129A;
Voided - MF-3592

Page 6 of 27 ends

1374
Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources RI-03458 1992 CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT:

WILDOMAR CHANNEL LATERAL C;

WILDOMAR AREA OF RIVERSIDE

COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

ARCHAEOLOGICAL
RESEARCH UNIT, U.C.

RIVERSIDE
NADB-R - 1084137; LOVE, BRUCE 33-004722
Submitter - 1175;
Voided - MF-3719
RI-03486 1992 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
A 7.22-ACRE PARCEL, AS SHOWN ON PM
26991

ARCHAEOLOGICAL
ASSOCIATES, LTD.

NADB-R - 1084156; WHITE, ROBERT S.

Voided - MF-3743
RI-03496 1992 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT

FOR RIVERSIDE COUNTY MURRIETA

CREEK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT

JONES & STOKES
ASSOCIATES, INC.

NADB-R - 1084178; 33-001085
Voided - MF-3757
RI-03498 1992 CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER

DISTRICT DATE STREET PUMP STATION,

RESERVOIR AND PIPELINE, MURRIETA

QUAD, CITY OF MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA

ARCHAEOLOGICAL

RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT CORP.

NADB-R - 1084183; DEMCAK, CAROL R.

Voided - MF-3761
RI-03757 1994 CULTURAL RESOURCES REPORT:

PHASE I RECORDS SEARCH AND FIELD
SURVEY, DAVID A. BROWN MIDDLE

SCHOOL DEBRIS BASIN AND STORM

DRAIN PROJECT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY
LOVE, BRUCE and CRM TECH

STEPHEN MOFFITT
NADB-R - 1084591; 33-002766, 33-002767
Submitter - 163;
Voided - MF-4094
RI-03956 1995 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF

THE WILDOMAR MDP LATERAL E

PROJECT LOCATED IN THE COMMUNITY

OF WILDOMAR, UNINCORPORATED

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

ARCHAEOLOGICAL

ASSOCIATES
NADB-R - 1084914; WHITE, ROBERT S. 33-006980
Voided - MF-4327
RI-03986 1996 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF

THE SENIOR LEISURE LIVING
DEVELOPMENT PROJECT: A 10.94 ACRE

PARCEL AS SHOWN ON PLOT PLAN
14543, WILDOMAR, UNINCORPORATED

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

ARCHAEOLOGICAL

ASSOCIATES
NADB-R - 1084961; WHITE, ROBERT S.

Other - PP 14543;
Voided - MF-4357
RI-04070 1998 CULTURAL RESOURCES REPORT WATER

AND SEWER PIPELINE RIGHTS-OF-WAY

AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES IN
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 97-
1, NEAR WILDOMAR ELSINORE VALLEY

MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT RIVERSIDE

COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
LOVE, BRUCE and BAI CRM TECH
"TOM" TANG
NADB-R - 1085219;
Submitter - 306;
Voided - MF-4519

Page 7 of 27 ends

1375
Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources RI-04116 1998 CULTURAL RESOURCES RECORDS

SEARCH AND SURVEY REPORT FOR A

PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES
TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY: CM
118-01, WILDOMAR, RIVERSIDE COUNTY,

CALIFORNIA
NADB-R - 1085304; BRECHBIEL, BRANT A. CHAMBERS GROUP, INC.

Voided - MF-4591
RI-04142 1989 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
A 20 ACRETRACT OF LAND DESIGNATED
TENTATIVETRACT #22555 LOCATED IN

THE WILDOMAR AREA, RIVERSIDE

COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND

ETHNOGRAPHIC FIELD

ASSOCIATES
NADB-R - 1085333; DE MUNCK, VICTOR C.

Other - TT
22555(1989) TR
29029 (1999)7;
Voided - MF-4618
RI-04259 1999 CULTURAL RESOURCES REPORT:

TENTATIVE TRACT 29332, NEAR THE

COMMUNITY OF WILDOMAR, RIVERSIDE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

LOVE, BRUCE, BAI CRM TECH
"TOM" TANG, MICHAEL
HOGAN, and DANIEL

BALLESTER
NADB-R - 1085497;
Submitter - 425;
Voided - MF-4740
RI-04279 2000 A CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT
OF TRACT 29511, 6.35-ACRES LOCATED

IMMEDIATELY NORTHWEST OF THE

INTERSECTION OF GRAND AVENUE AND

CHADLYN COURT IN WILDOMAR,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY.

ARCHAEOLOGICAL

ASSOCIATES
WHITE, ROBERT S. and
LAURA S. WHITE
NADB-R - 1085524;
Voided - MF-4757
RI-04297 1998 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY AND

ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVALUATIONS FOR

THE CLINTON KEITH ROAD AND

RESIDENTIAL PROJECT (TRACT MAP
29039 AND PARCEL MAP 29040), COUNTY
OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA.

NADB-R - 1085559; WADE, SUE A. HERITAGE RESOURCES 33-008652, 33-008654 Other - HR 98006;
Voided - MF-4780
RI-04298 1999 A PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES

INVESTIGATION OF THE HIGHLANDS

SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT AREA, NEAR

MURRIETA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA.

MCKENNA, JEANETTE MCKENNA ET AL
A. and DAVID
NADB-R - 1085560; 33-003413, 33-003956
Submitter - 08-99-
460;
Voided - MF-4781
RI-04323 2000 HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL
RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT: APN 367-
300-030, NEAR THE COMMUNITY OF

WILDOMAR, RIVERSIDE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA.

LOVE, BRUCE, BAI CRM TECH
"TOM" TANG, and

MICHAEL HOGAN
NADB-R - 1085593;
Submitter - 544;
Voided - MF-4806
RI-04335 1999 A PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES

ASSESSMENT OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
29163, CHANGE OF ZONE 6128, 6.5

ACRES OF LAND IN WILDOMAR,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

NADB-R - 1085627; KELLER, JEAN A. AUTHOR
Voided - MF-4831

Page 8 of 27 ends

1376
Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources RI-04350 1999 A CULTURAL RESOURCES

RECONNAISSANCE FOR THE

MACARTHUR PROPERTIES, LOCATED IN
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

NADB-R - 1085648; BROWN, JOAN C. RMW PALEO 33-008949
Submitter - 99-1471;
Voided - MF-4846
RI-04382 2000 A CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT
OF A 3.86-ACRE PORTION OF APN 368-
150-001 LOCATED IMMEDIATELY SOUTH

OF GRAND AVENUE AT WESLEY STREET,
WILDOMAR, RIVERSIDE COUNTY.

ARCHAEOLOGICAL

ASSOCIATES
WHITE, ROBERT S. and
LAURA S. WHITE
NADB-R - 1085708; 33-009641
Voided - MF-4884
RI-04390 2000 A PHASE 1 CULTURAL RESOURCES

ASSESSMENT OF GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT 540/CHANGE OF ZONE 6536

LOCATED NEAR MURRIETA, RIVERSIDE

COUNTY CALIFORNIA
KELLER, JEAN A. JEAN A. KELLER 33-001257, 33-003405, 33-003956, 33-008173, 33-008652, 33-008949
NADB-R - 1085717;
Voided - MF-4892
RI-04470 2002 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY AND
ASSESSMENT OF APPROXIMATELY 10.73
ACRES: OAK CREEK APARTMENT

COMPLEX PROJECT, ELIZABETH LANE

AND PRIELIPP ROAD, WILDOMAR,

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORIA
NADB-R - 1085831; ROBINSON, MARK C. GREAT LAKES RESEARCH 33-011434, 33-011435, 33-011436 Submitter - 02-1
RI-04507 2001 A PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES

ASSESSMENT OF A PORTION OF
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 29476, 8.82
ACRES OF LAND LOCAT4ED NEAR THE

CITY OF MURRIETA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY,

CALIFORNIA
NADB-R - 1085868 KELLER, JEAN A. AUTHOR
RI-04509 2001 A Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment Of The Palomar Street Project, 5.0 Acres Of
Land Near The City Of Murrieta, Riverside
County, California
Jean A. Keller, Cultural
Resources Consultant
NADB-R - 1085870 Jean A. Keller
RI-04510 2001 A PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES
ASSESSMENT OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO.
29836, GPA 549/CZ6559, 16.07 ACRES OF

LAND NEAR THE CITY OF MURRIETA,

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
NADB-R - 1085871 KELLER, JEAN A. AUTHOR
RI-04608 2002 PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES
ASSESSMENT: TENTATIVE TRACT NO.
30917, WILDOMAR, RIVERSIDE COUNTY,

CALIFORNIA
NADB-R - 1085968 SHEPARD, RICHARD S. BONTERRA CONSULTING 33-012289

Page 9 of 27 ends

1377
Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources RI-04641 2001 A PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES

ASSESSMENT OF CHANGE OF ZONE
6618, 29.10 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED

NEAR THE CITY OF MURRIETA,

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
NADB-R - 1086000 KELLER, JEAN A. AUTHOR
RI-04655 2003 A PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES
ASSESSMENT OF APN 380-130-015, -016,

10.46 ACRES OF LAND IN WILDOMARK,

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
NADB-R - 1086014 KELLER, JEAN A. Jean A. Keller, consultant RI-04658 1994 PHASE II TEST INVESTIGATION OF CARIV-2767, DAVID A. BROWN MIDDLE

SCHOOL DEBRIS BASIN AND STORM

PROJECT
NADB-R - 1086017 KELLER, JEAN A. AUTHOR 33-002766, 33-002767 RI-04698 2003 A PHASE I ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY
OF APPROX. 3.5-ACRES FOR THE

STONEBRIDGE MEDICAL OFFICE

BUILDING, WILDOMAR, RIVERSIDE

COOUNTY, CALIFORNIA
NADB-R - 1086060 TETRA TECH, INC. TETRA TECH, INC.

RI-04774 2004 LETTER REPORT: VALLEY-NEWCOMBSKYLARK 115 KV TRANSMISSION LINE

BURNED POLE REPLACEMENT PROJECT,

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

COMPASS ROSE
ARCHAEOLOGICAL, INC.,
Van Nuys, CA
NADB-R - 1086136 SCHMIDT, JAMES J.

RI-04876 2004 A PHASE I ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY
OF APPROXIMATELY 6.17-ACRES FOR

THE MISSION TRAILS PROJECT LOCATED
AT 32795-32788 CORYDON ROAD, LAKE

ELSINORE, RIVERSIDE COUNTY,

CALIFORNIA
NADB-R - 1086238; TETRA TECH, INC. TETRA TECH, INC.

Other - TC# 14455-01
RI-04877 2003 CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

OF THE PROPOSED TEMECULA VALLEY

REGIONAL WATER RECLAMATION

FACILITY EFFLUENT PIPELINE,

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

PEAK & ASSOCIATES,
INC.

NADB-R - 1086239 33-010986
RI-04885 2003 A PHASE I ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORDS

SEARCH AND SURVEY REPORT FOR
TT#31009, APN 362-150-023, COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA.

L&L ENVIRONMENTAL,
INC.

IRISH, LESLIE NAY,
ANNA M. HOOVER, and
KRISTIE R. BELVINS
NADB-R - 1086247;
Submitter - GD-03-
R209

Page 10 of 27 ends

1378
Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources RI-04937 2003 A PHASE I CULTURAL REOURCES

SURVEY OF THE DEPASQUALE FAMILY

PARTNERSHIP PROPOERTY (TRACT
30155) IN THE OAK SPRINGS AREA OF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

MCKENNA, JEANETTE MCKENNA ET AL.

NADB-R - 1086299;
Submitter - 04-03-06-
748
RI-04938 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS:

PHASE I ARCHAEOLOGICAL TESTING OF
SITE CA-RIV-3956H, LOCATED WITHIN

THE SUNSET RIDGE SPECIFIC PLAN

PROJECT AREA, MURRIETA, RIVERSIDE

COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MCKENNA, JEANETTE MCKENNA ET AL.

NADB-R - 1086300; 33-003956
Submitter - 11-02-01-
686
RI-04945 2004 A Phase I Archaeological and Paleontological Survey Report for the Palomar Office Plaza,
APN 380-170-020, Wildomar, County of
Riverside, California
Leslie Nay Irish, Anna M. L&L Environmental, Inc.

Hoover, Kristie R.

Blevins, and Hugh M.

Wagner
NADB-R - 1086307;
Submitter - MF-03-
273
RI-04962 2004 FINAL REPORT FOR THE PAHSE I

ARCHAEOLOGICAL/PALEONTOLOGICAL
SURVEY TRACT 32859, APN 380-070-018,

15.6-ACRE PROPERTY

L&L ENVIRONMENTAL,
INC.

HOOVER, ANNA M. and

HUGH WAGNER
NADB-R - 1086324;
Submitter - GLH-04-
532
RI-05009 2001 A PALEONTOLOGICAL OVERVIEW OF
THE USA PETROLEUM CORP. PROJECT

SITE LOCATED IN THE WILDOMAR AREA

OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
NADB-R - 1086371; MCKENNA ET AL. MCKENNA ET AL.

Submitter - 06-01-06-
576
RI-05058 2002 SUPPLEMENTAL STUDIES: A PHASE I

CULTURAL RESOURCES INVESTIGATION

OF THE SUNSET RIDGE ACCESS

ROUTES, MURRIETA, RIVERSIDE

COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
NADB-R - 1086420; Jeanette A. McKenna MCKENNA ET AL. 33-003513, 33-003956 Submitter - 09-02-12-
675
RI-05095 2003 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY OF

FOUR ACRES IN WILDOMAR, CALIFORNIA
NADB-R - 1086457 APPLIED EARTHWORKS APPLIED EARTHWORKS
RI-05181 2002 CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL

RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, WINDSOR

PACIFIC CENTURY HOMES TENTATIVE
TRACT 29402, RIVERSIDE COUNTY,

CALIFORNIA
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.,
Riverside, CA

GOODWIN, RIORDAN
and ROBERT E.

REYNOLDS
NADB-R - 1086544; 33-008948, 33-008949
Submitter - LSA
Project No. PCY 232
RI-05216 2002 PHASE II TESTING AND EVALUATION OF
33-11434 (CA-RIV-6821)
NADB-R - 1086579 ROBINSON, MARK C. GREAT LAKES RESEARCH 33-011434 RI-05355 2006 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY FOR

THE MISSION TRAILS DEVELOPMENT

PROJECT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CA

SWCA SMCA ENVIRONMENTAL

ENVIRONMENTAL

CONSULTANTS
NADB-R - 1086718 33-014891

Page 11 of 27 ends

1379
Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources RI-05369 2004 A PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCE

ASSESSMENT OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
31896
NADB-R - 1086732 KELLER, JEAN A. JEAN KELLER
RI-05370 2004 A PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCE

ASSESSMENT OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
31895
NADB-R - 1086733 KELLER, JEAN A. JEAN KELLER
RI-05378 2004 A PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCE

ASSESSMENT OF TENTATIVE PARCEL
MAP 29845
NADB-R - 1086741 KELLER, JEAN JEAN KELLER
RI-05497 2004 A PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES

ASSESSMENT OF CORNERSTONE
CHURCH EXPANSION (APN 367-140-008,
367-210-018), +/-48.43 ACRES OF LAND IN

WILDOMAR, RIVERSIDE COUNTY,

CALIFORNIA
NADB-R - 1086860 KELLER, JEAN A. JEAN KELLER
RI-05500 2004 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY AND
ASSESSMENT OF APPROXIMATELY 12.1

ACRES, MISSION HILLS, WILDOMAR

PROJECT, TENTATIVE TRACE MAP
#31993 (APN 368-030-007, -055, AND -056),

WILDOMAR, RIVERSIDE COUNTY,

CALIFORNIA
NADB-R - 1086863 ROBINSON, MARK C. GREAT LAKES RESEARCH RI-05536 2005 A PHASE I CULTURAL RESORUCES

ASSESSMENT OF HIDDEN SPRINGS
RANCH APN 380-290-029, +/-9.5 ACRES OF

LAND NEAR WILDOMAR, RIVERSIDE

COUNTY, CA
NADB-R - 1086899 KELLER, JEAN A. JENA KELLER
RI-05578 2004 A CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT
OF A 39.5 ACRE PARCEL AS SHOWN ON
TTM 32024, LOCATED ADJACENT TO

MONTE VISTA DRIVE, WILDOMAR,

RIVERSIDE COUNTY
John Minch and Associates,
Inc., Santa Barbara, CA
WHITE, ROBERT S. and
LAURA S. WHITE
NADB-R - 1086941
RI-05611 2000 A CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY: AN

ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF
CLYATON RANCH, APN'S 369-260-003/ 369-
260-005, NEAR WILDOMAR, CLINTON

KEITH ROAD, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CA

DROVER, CHRISTOPHER DROVER
CHRISTOPHER E.

NADB-R - 1086974

Page 12 of 27 ends

1380
Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources RI-05613 2005 A CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT
OF A 9.58 ACRE PARCEL AS SHOWN ON
TPM 32592 LOCATED AT 23800 OAK

CIRCLE DRIVE, WILDOMAR, RIVERSIDE
COUNTY

ARCHAEOLOGICAL

ASSOCIATES
WHITE, ROBERT S. and
LAURA S. WHITE
NADB-R - 1086976
RI-05617 2003 A CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT
OF 6.23 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT

THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BUNDY
CANYON ROAD AND INTERSTATE 15,

WILDOMAR, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CA

ARCHAEOLOGICAL

ASSOCIATES
WHITE, ROBERT S. and
LAURA S. WHITE
NADB-R - 1086980
RI-05683 2005 Letter Report: Proposed Cellular Tower
Project(s) in Riverside County, California, Site
Name/Number: CA-7281A/ Wildomar
NADB-R - 1087046; Erika Thal EarthTouch, Inc., Layton, UT Submitter - CA-7281A
RI-05732 2003 Letter Report: Proposed Cellular Tower
Project in Riverside County, California, Site
Name/Number: CA-7281A/ Wildomar
NADB-R - 1087095 Mark Bellini EarthTouch, Inc.

RI-05750 2003 HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL
RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT: BEAR

CREEK VILLAGE CENTER, NEAR THE

CITY OF MURRIETA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY,

CALIFORNIA
DAHDUL, MARIAM and CRM TECH

DANIEL BALLESTER
NADB-R - 1087113;
Submitter - 1013
RI-05757 2003 HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL
RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT:

TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 30939, GROSS

RANCH PROJECT NEAR THE CITY OF

MURRIETA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY,

CALIFORNIA
NADB-R - 1087120; DAHDUL, MARIAM CRM TECH
Submitter - 998
RI-05758 2003 HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL
RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT:

TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 30839, DAVIS

RANCH PROJECT, NEAR THE CITY OF

MURRIETA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY,

CALIFORNIA
NADB-R - 1087121; DAHDUL, MARIAM CRM TECH
Submitter - 997
RI-05920 2002 HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL

RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT,
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 30656, APNS
362-180-029 TO -032, WILDOMAR AREA,

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CA

LOVE, BRUCE, BAI CRM TECH

TANG, TERESA

WOODARD, MARIAM
DAHDUL, and DANIEL

BALLESTER
NADB-R - 1087283;
Submitter - 896

Page 13 of 27 ends

1381
Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources RI-05921 2002 HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL

RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT,
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 30734,

CLINTON KEITH ROAD AND SMITH RANCH

ROAD, WILDOMAR AREA, RIVERSIDE

COUNTY, CA

LOVE, BRUCE, BAI CRM TECH

TANG, TERESA

WOODARD, MARIAM
DAHDUL, and DANIEL

BALLESTER
NADB-R - 1087284; 33-007804, 33-007812
Submitter - 893
RI-05967 2003 HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL

RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT,
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 31499, NEAR

THE CITY OF MURRIETA, RIVERSIDE

COUNTY, CA

TANG, BAI, MICHAEL CRM TECH

HOGAN, JOSH
SMALLWOOD, and

DANIEL BALLESTER
NADB-R - 1087330;
Submitter - 1096
RI-05970 2003 HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL

RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT,
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 31479, NEAR

THE CITY OF MURRIETA, RIVERSIDE

COUNTY, CA

TANG, BAI, MICHAEL CRM TECH

HOGAN, CASEY
TIBBET, and DANIEL

BALLESTER
NADB-R - 1087333;
Submitter - 1061
RI-06023 2003 HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL

RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT,
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 31331, EA NO.
39030, NEAR THE CITY OF MURRIETA,

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CA

TANG, BAI, MICHAEL CRM TECH
HOGAN, and MARIAM
DAHDUL
NADB-R - 1087386;
Submitter - 1079
RI-06024 2003 HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL

RESORUCES SURVEY REPORT,
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 31353 AND
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 369-180-025,

NEAR THE CITY OF MURRIETA,

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CA

TANG, BAI, MICHAEL CRM TECH

HOGAN, CASEY
TIBBET, and DANIEL

BALLESTER
NADB-R - 1087387;
Submitter - 1095
RI-06030 2004 A PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES

ASSESSMENT OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
31896 AMENDED NO. 1, +/-4.88 ACRES OF

LAND IN WILDOMAR, RIVERSIDE

COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
NADB-R - 1087393 KELLER, JEAN A. JEAN A. KELLER
RI-06031 2004 A PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES

ASSESSMENT OF THE CLINTON KEITH
ROAD PROJECT (APN 380-110-025, 026) +/-

4.35 ACRES OF LAND IN WILDOMAR,

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
NADB-R - 1087394 KELLER, JEAN A. JEAN A. KELLER
RI-06033 2004 A PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES

ASSESSMENT OF VESTING TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP 32166, +/-20.20 ACRES OF

LAND IN WILDOMAR, RIVERSIDE

COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
NADB-R - 1087396 KELLER, JEAN A. JEAN A. KELLER

Page 14 of 27 ends

1382
Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources RI-06035 2004 A PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES
ASSESSMENT OF PLOT PLAN 19064, +/-10

ACRES OF LAND NEAR MURRIETA,

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
NADB-R - 1087398 KELLER, JEAN A. JEAN A. KELLER
RI-06036 2005 A PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES

ASSESSMENT OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
31813, 27.57 ACRES OF LAND NEAR

WILDOMAR, RIVERSIDE COUNTY,

CALIFORNIA
NADB-R - 1087399 KELLER, JEAN A. JEAN A. KELLER
RI-06161 2003 Letter Report: Records Search and Site Visit for Sprint Telecommunications Facility
Candidate RV54XC512E (Chico Hills &
Bundy), NE Corner Chico Hills Rd. & Bundy
Canyon, Menifee, Riverside County, California
Michael Brandman
Associates
NADB-R - 1087524 Michael Dice
RI-06170 2004 Letter Report: Cultural Resource Records
Search and Site Visit Results for Cingular
Telecommunications Facility Candidate SC236-02 (Archer Ranch), 21745 Grand Avenue, Wildomar, Riverside County,
Riverside
Michael Brandman
Associates
NADB-R - 1087533 Marnie Aislin-Kay
RI-06171 2004 LETTER REPORT: RECORDS SEARCH

AND SITE VISIT RESULTS FOR SPRINT

TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY
CANDIDATE RV54XC511G (CALIFORNIA
LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL), 31970

CENTRAL AVENUE, WILDOMAR,

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CA

MICHAEL BRANDMAN

ASSOCIATES
NADB-R - 1087534 AISLIN-KAY, MARNIE
RI-06234 2004 HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL

RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT,
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 31837, NEAR

THE CITY OF MURRIETA, RIVERSIDE

COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

TANG, BAI, MICHAEL CRM TECH
HOGAN, and JOHN J.

EDDY
NADB-R - 1087597;
Submitter - CRM

TECH CONTRACT
#1288
RI-06245 2004 THE SCHWARTZ-SMITH HOUSE, 25025

CLINTON KEITH ROAD (FORMERLY CATT
ROAD), WILDOMAR, CA 92395
NADB-R - 1087608; TANG, BAI "TOM" CRM TECH 33-007804, 33-007812 Submitter - CRM

TECH CONTRACT
#1258
RI-06248 2004 HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL

RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT,
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 31219,

NEAR THE CITY OF MURRIETA,

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

HOGAN, MICHAEL, BAI CRM TECH
"TOM" TANG, and JOSH

SMALLWOOD
NADB-R - 1087611; 33-002767
Submitter - CRM

TECH CONTRACT
#1184

Page 15 of 27 ends

1383
Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources RI-06249 2004 Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report: Tentative Tract Map No. 32078, Near
the City of Murrieta, Riverisde County,
California
Bai Tang, Michael CRM TECH
Hogan, Casey Tibbet,
and John Eddy
NADB-R - 1087612; 33-006980
Submitter - CRM
TECH Contract #1289
RI-06286 2004 LETTER REPORT: PALEONTOLOGICAL

MONITORING, BEAR CREEK VILLAGE
CENTER, C.U.P NO. 3390, ASSESSORS
PARCEL NUMBERS 369-390-002,-010,-012,-
018, IN AN UNINCORPORATED AREA

NEAR THE CITY OF MURRIETA,

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CA, CRM TECH
CONTRACT NO. 1191
NADB-R - 1087649; HOGAN, MICHAEL CRM TECH
Submitter - CRM

TECH CONTRACT
#1191
RI-06345 2004 Archaeological Test and Evaluation Report:

Site CA-RIV-2767/H, Tentative Parcel Map
No. 31219, Near the City of Murrieta,
Riverside County, California
Michael Hogan, Bai CRM TECH
"Tom" Tang, Harry M.

Quinn, and Ayse
Taskiran-Johnson
NADB-R - 1087708; 33-002767
Submitter - CRM
TECH Contract #1325
RI-06363 2004 HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL

RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT,
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 376-060-010
AND -013, NEAR THE COMMUNITY OF

WILDOMAR, RIVERSIDE COUNTY,

CALIFORNIA

TANG, BAI, MICHAEL CRM TECH

HOGAN, DEIRDRE
ENCARNACION, and
THOMAS J. MELZER
NADB-R - 1087726;
Submitter -
CONTRACT #1429
RI-06397 2005 HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL
RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT:

TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 32792, NEAR

THE COMMUNITY OF WILDOMAR,

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CA

TANG, BAI, MICHAEL CRM TECH

HOGAN, MATTHEW
WETHERBEE, and

DANIEL BALLESTER
NADB-R - 1087760;
Submitter -
CONTRACT #6397
RI-06398 2005 HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL
RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT: GRIZZLY
RIDGE RESERVOIR NO. 2, NEAR THE

CITY OF MURRIETA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY,
CA

TANG, BAI, MICHAEL CRM TECH

HOGAN, MATTHEW
WETHERBEE, and

DANIEL BALLESTER
NADB-R - 1087761;
Submitter -
CONTRACT #1521
RI-06400 2005 HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL
RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT:

TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32535, NEAR

THE COMMUNITY OF WILDOMAR,

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CA

TANG, BAI, MICHAEL CRM TECH

HOGAN, MATTHEW
WETHERBEE, and

DANIEL BALLESTER
NADB-R - 1087763;
Submitter -
CONTRACT #1608

Page 16 of 27 ends

1384
Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources RI-06442 2005 HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL
RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT:

TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 31813, IN AN

UNINCORPORATED AREA NEAR THE

COMMUNITY OF WILDMOAR, RIVERSIDE

COUNTY, CA

TANG, BAI, MICHAEL CRM TECH

HOGAN, MATTHEW
WETHERBEE, and

JOHN EDDY
NADB-R - 1087807;
Submitter -
CONTRACT #1499
RI-06465 2004 HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL

RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT,
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 31409, NEAR

THE COMMUNITY OF WILDOMAR,

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CA

TANG, BAI, MICHAEL CRM TECH

HOGAN, CASEY
TIBBET, and JOHN
EDDY
NADB-R - 1087830;
Submitter -
CONTRACT #1272
RI-06493 2004 HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL

RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT,
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 25122, NEAR

THE CITY OF MURRIETA, RIVERSIDE

COUNTY, CA

TANG, BAI, MICHAEL CRM TECH
HOGAN, and MATTHEW

WETHERBEE
NADB-R - 1087860; 33-006980
Submitter -
CONTRACT #1326
RI-06494 2005 HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL

RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT,
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 376-190-
002, AND 376-108-006, NEAR THE

COMMUNITY OF WILDOMAR, RIVERSIDE

COUNTY, CA

HOGAN, MICHAEL, BAI CRM TECH
TANG, and MATTHEW

WETHERBEE
NADB-R - 1087861;
Submitter -
CONTRACT #1603A
RI-06556 2006 HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL

RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT,
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 380-110-
003, NEAR THE CITY OF MURRIETA,

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

TANG, BAI, MICHAEL CRM TECH

HOGAN, MELISSA
HERNANDEZ, and

TERRI JACQUEMAIN
NADB-R - 1087923;
Submitter -
CONTRACT #1779
RI-06592 2005 HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL

RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT,
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 366-320-145,

NEAR THE COMMUNITY OF WILDOMAR,

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CA

HOGAN, MICHAEL, BAI CRM TECH
"TOM" TANG,

MATTHEW
WETHERBEE, and

JOSH SMALLWOOD
33-014780, 33-014781, 33-014782,
33-014783
NADB-R - 1087959
RI-06593 2006 ARCHAEOLOGICAL TESTING AND
EVALUATION REPORT, SITE 33-14780 (CARIV-7868) AND ISOLATE 33-14783, THE

CLARK PROPERTY, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NO 366-320-045, NEAR THE COMMUNITY

OF WILDOMAR, RIVERSIDE COUNTY,

CALIFORNIA

HOGAN, MICHAEL, BAI CRM TECH
"TOM" TANG, JOSH
SMALLWOOD, and

THOMAS MELZER
NADB-R - 1087960; 33-014780, 33-014783
Submitter -
CONTRACT #1773

Page 17 of 27 ends

1385
Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources RI-06594 2006 ARCHAEOLOGICAL TESTING AND
EVALUATION REPORT, SITE 33-14778 (CARIV-7866/H) AND 33-14779 (CA-RIV-7867),

THE KING PROPERTY, ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NOS. 366-320-024, -025, AND -
028, NEAR THE COMMUNITY OF

WILDOMAR, RIVERSIDE COUNTY,

CALIFORNIA
HOGAN. MICHAEL, BAI CRM TECH
"TOM" TANG, JOSH
SMALLWOOD, and

THOMAS MELZER
NADB-R - 1087961; 33-014778, 33-014779
Submitter -
CONTRACT #1772
RI-06596 2006 HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL

RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT, THE

BUNDY PROJECT, SECCO HILLS AREA,

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
TANG, BAI "TOM", CRM TECH

MICHAEL HOGAN,

TERRI JACQUEMAIN,
and ROBERT PORTER
NADB-R - 1087963; 33-017309
Submitter -
CONTRACT #1942
RI-06697 2006 ARCHEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT FOR

THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
COMPANY: OVERHEAD TO

UNDERGROUND CONVERSION PROJECT,

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
(WO#6477-7274, AI#6-7212)
NADB-R - 1088064; JORDAN, STACEY C. JONES & STOKES
Other - CONTRACT
NO. 06998.06
RI-06737 2006 CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT,

BAXTER PROJECT, AN

UNINCORPORATED AREA OF WILDOMAR,

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
NADB-R - 1088104; AUSTERMAN, VIRGINIA LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. 33-015306 Submitter - LSA
PROJECT NO.

OKE0601
RI-06827 2006 Archaeological Survey Report for the
Southern California Edison Company,
Wildomar Service Center Project
Southern California Edison
Company, Natural and
Cultural Resources Group
Williams, Audry 33-015304, 33-015305
RI-06830 2006 Cultural Resources Inventory of 3 Acres,
A.P.N. 380-240-001, -001, and -003,
Wildomar, Riverside County, California
Sander, Jay K. Chambers Group, Inc.

RI-06905 2006 Archaeological Survey Report for the
Southern California Edison Company, DSPDOROF 12Kv Circuit Project, Riverside County, California (WO# 6077-5395; AI# 6-
5301 and 6-5302)
Mooney Jones & Stokes,
San Diego, CA
Other - Contract No. Jordan, Stacey C.
06715.06, 06788.06
RI-06906 2006 Archeological Survey Report for the Southern California Edison Company, DSP-Cereal
12Kv Circuit Project, Riverside County
(WO#6577-5326, AI#6-5303)
Other - Contract No. Jordan, Stacey C. Mooney, Jones & Stokes 06788.06

Page 18 of 27 ends

Wildomar City CouncilDecember 9, 2024

Wildomar City Council
December 9, 2024